Loading...
11-15-88OFFICIAL AGENDA CITY OF SOUTH MiAMI 6130 Sunset Drive REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 15TH, 1988 7:30 P.M. A. Invocation Next Resolution:163 -88 -7074 Next Ordinance: 20 -88 -1414 Next Commission Meeting: 12 /6/88 B. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America C. Items for Commission Consideration: 1. Approval of Minutes of November 1st, 1988, regular City Commission meeting 2. Reports: a. City Manager b. City Attorney ORDINANCES- SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT: 3. An Ordinance adopting an amendment to the South Miami Comprehensive Plan adopted 3/5 June 3rd, 1981. (City Commission) RESOLUTIONS FOR PUBLIC HEARING: 4. A Resolution granting a variance to allow a -:55' side setback where 716" is 4/5 required on property legally described as Lots 27 and 28, Block 4, of SEA VIEW PARK SUBDIVISION, as recorded at Plat Book 17, Page 80 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida,'a /k /a 5911 S.W. 83rd Street, South Miami, Florida. *(Public Hearing portion on this item was completed at the City Commission meeting of October 18th, 1988). P I (Planning Board /Administration) or 5. A Resolution granting a Home Occupations 1 License Landscape Architecture on 4/5 property legally described as Lot 6, less the ,North 10' and Lot 7, less the North 5', Block 2, LAWRENCE TERRACE SUBDIVISION, as;recorddd at Plat Book 47, Page 61 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida,'a /k %a 7511 S.W. 64 Court, South Miami, Florida. (Planning Board /Administration) 6. A Resolution granting a variance to allow an illuminated window sign in a C -2 4/5 District where such sign is not permitted, on property legally described as Lots 75 -79, W.A. LARKINS SUBDIVISION, as recorded at Plat Book 3, Page,198, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, a /k /a 7306 Red Road, South Miami, Florida:. ` e} ?4(p Board /Administration) Ao 3 - D 7. A Resolution granting a waiver of plat and allowing two Tots with a frontage of 4/5 40' where 75' is required on property legally described as the South 264' of the - North 490.92' of the West 1/2 of the West 1/2 of the S.W. 1/4 of the S.W. 1/4 of Section, 25, Township 54 South, Range 40 East, less the West 35' of land situated in Dade County, Florida, a /k /a 6851 S.W. 67th Avenue, South Miami, Florida. (Planning Board /Administration) RESOLUTIONS: l' 8. A Resolution appointing William Hampton as City Manager of the City of South 3/5 Miami, Florida. ��IISP (Commissioner Launcelott) 9. A Resolution authoriz ng the City Manager to advertise requests for proposals 3/5 for a consultant to draft land use zoning regulations in comformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Plan Amendments. (Commissioner McCann) ORDINANCES - FIRST READING: 10. An Ordinance amending Section 6 -2 -2 of Article VI of Chapter 20 of the City's 3/5 Zoning Code by requiring that all extensions of temporary permits be approved by four (4) affirmative votes of the City Commission. (Commissioner McCann) 2 9 REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA NOVEMBER 15TH, 1988 PAGE 2 ORDINANCES - FIRST READING (continued) 11. An Ordinance amending Section 5 -14 -2 of Chapter 20 of the Code of Zoning Ordinances and amending Chapter 13, Article VIII, Section 177.000 of the City's Occupational License Code by deleting pawnshops as a specifically permitted use in the City. (Commissioner Brown) REMARKS: I. Appeal: II. Appeal: III Appeal: IV. Appeal: V. Appeal VI. Appeal r Servilio Herrera for starting work prior to securing proper permit for job t 6841 S.W. 78th Terrace I- f Princess Roofing or starting work prior to securing proper permit for job �533-6 S.W.57th Avenue or stacl Mario Rojas, C 21L Electri tin g work prior to securing proper permit for job at 5975 Sunset Drive, #804A Mario Rojaw, Sanol i Plumbiiigfor staing work prior to ,securing proper ermit for job at 5975 Ytarting nset Drive, #804A Mario Rojas, Soo Air Conditioning, o work prior to securing proper permit A or job at 5975_ Sunset Drive, #804A Mario Rojas, St 4 and /Cons action, Z r farting work, prior to securing proper permit for job at 5975 Sunset Drive, #804A DEFERRED AND /OR TABLED: none You are hereby advised that if any person desires to appeal any decision with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such person will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. 3/5 4. I a. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIANI, PLORIDA, ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTH MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADOPTED JUNE 3RD, 1981. WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinances No. 13 -81 -1107 and as amended by Ordinance No. 22 -82 -1145 of the City of South Miami Code of Ordinances, the Mayor and City Commission may, by resolution, initiate an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan adopted pursuant to the above-referenced ordinances; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 12 -88 -8028, the 'Mayor and City Commission did initiate an amendment pursuant to this procedure; and WHEREAS, pursuant to these above - referenced Ordinances, applications from the public were received during October and November, 19871 for amendments to the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Part II, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, a'public hearing was conducted on March 7th, 1988 by the Local Planning Agency which has made recommendations and modifications to the Mayor and City Commission in regard to the amendment requests from the Commission and the public. NOR', THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That the application from the public received from Robert Chisholm as an amendment request and the City initiated amendment are ` accepted for transmittal to the prescribed agencies in accord with Part II, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes as an amendment to the City's current comprehensive Plan adopted June 3e -1981, and as the same has been amended. Section 2. That this amendment shall be transmitted as the Comprehensive Plan Amendment dated May 11, 1988. Section 3. This amendment shall become effective upon final adoption after review by the agencies described in Part II, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, and the procedures set forth in said Chapter. i i i e 1 i PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of •�• APPROVED MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY Passed on 1st Reading May 11, 1988 Passed on 2nd Reading: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A 4.55' SIDE SETBACK WHERE 7'6" IS REQUIRED ON PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 27 AND 28, BLOCK 4, OF SEA VIEW PARK. SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED AT PLAT BOOK 17, PAGE 80,,.Ol' THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY , FLORIDA, A /K /A 5911 S.W. 83RD STREET, SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA. AGENDA ITEM PB -88 -015 WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a variance to allow a 4.55' side setback where 716" is required and the staff recommendation is for approval; and WHEREAS, at a public hearing on August -30, 1988, the Planning Board voted -3 -2 to grant the request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION; OF THE CITY OF SOUTH - MIAMI, FLORIDA Section 1. That the variance to allow a 4.55' side setback. where 7'A-" is required on property legally described as: Lots 27 and 28, Block 4, Sea View Park Subdivision, as recorded at Plat Book 17, Page 80, of the public records of Dade County, Florida, a /k /a 5911 S.W. 83rd Street, South Miami, Florida. is hereby granted. Section 2. This variance is conditioned 'upon a covenant running with the land being placed on adjacent Lot 26, in that the entire east side setback of said Lot 26 shall be 1015 ". PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of ,1988.. APPROVED: ATTEST; MAYOR CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY sm setbackl.res August 3, 1988 T0: South Miami Planning Board SUB: Side Set Back Variance As a result of conversations with the City Hall Zoning Dept., 1 am writing this letter to request a variance to 5-3-3-.02. My house was built in 1954 and _ is located at 5911 S.W. 83rd St. Consequently, the existing structure has a side set back of 5 ft., not the now required 71 ft. (5- 3-3.02)• I have submitted plans to add a Studio and Florida Room to the existing lines of the current structure to gain uniformity, value and a generally more appealing visual appearance, i.e., converting the existing flat gravel /tar carport roof to a the /pitched roof. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, r-- Wayne R. Mitchell cc: Soheila Goudarzi Dave Henderson .z THE CITY OF Sout4 liami $130 SUNSET DRIVE, SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 3314 PUBLIC SERVICE DEPARTMENT Z O N I N G P E T I T I O N Property Description, Location and Legal: �// .� �-� �3 fir• w T 2? Request t The Owners of the above property have made the following request -T-o �'�cJO<stiv 46: 457 %gig Petition: We, the undersigned property owners, are within 300 feet of the above property. We understand and approve the above request. NAME DATE ADDRESS -z .P 1- - - - - - -�� - -�- `,- - -1 i 1 - _ - -if -S c v _83_ ter- .33j �n g3 Elk.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - t S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L Ck 5 - - - - - - - - - - --------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------- 50 -37 (continued on page 2) Page 1 ' • w • '�• '� Z� ��g �f rTJ f '..�'�' 1¢' ` `L• 7 %.wl.•1' .Ir�� -�' • ••�4r� ".' j� - ,�•��'•.�►?4• *���r" �j 1 •i rk� • "� � _.... - .-�,�`'�.r - 7(`��y!y''i`".'� f• "rtfs S''� a ""t'" ��„Y.�'�s."� 1,; � fi`•• ii. ,r • - li ( 3 { t} a.. 1 - ` -. ' +1�1 i LE JEU'+E AC. � •� - ,•-,' ` - :� � �•�' -�eo �RYFri� - tF1Ei�F10NE: YEV +• r•i 4 xxx +qTt� . -- of AM At�O i PtJtI b00KNa 17 AT PAoz Nc. B O MUO ot I — . - _.;..ic - . 70 1": 'a. • Fr - 1 • So `SIDED -•w -~ a � - sss0 • 1 yam. +♦ _Air all flo AL 0�0 _ dmce h i /T-o 0 I6.T FOeeAl �c, A • /Z OE N .. pf t< yx{�- it. r a.)Y�41 •. ref` (. jay pextiy !t ' ss of 77suryexQf -r la M4 Vd o Md)o,ate best of my bxhviedge end bebef as i''� !' ft mk1knM dq*Q d by the tt�C8c7UY 6 I t8a*wr*'Oft ! , !;•• IXi[xida 57� �� jf'X8 E1@ p�o/ojl� Al�SQGi9bOf1. itT@t8 8r@ r10 as Wf O". / T. i j�terrC s*t>rrr£t hfD �j.`f e_^ ,+ '1 r ;'Ft LOT DETA" ," SCALE 1 i� 1.... tip.'.- +...ns•...+....��s+.— .-.. y'� -t •-� q ^ti. •r+-_., �'�`^4+�0 �7•T.�.1"' �t� i'r _ `... K'�'3`. :� `.'+'r.`•J:!"4'w :•� �"'Tlt'i.i°.r1�i.- C'7^'.�n�l .. !" 1 City of !nth Miami R INTER— OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Marien Aran- Spinrad DATE: August 30, 1988 Director, Building, Zoning and Community Development room: Soheila Goudarzi SUBJECT: STAFF REPORT PB -88 -015 Planner VARIANCE TO SIDE SETBACK General Applicant: Wayne R. Mitchell Request: Variance to Section 5 -3 -3.02 of the Zoning Ordinance to allow 4.55' side setback where 7'6" is required. Location: 5911 SW 83 Street Legal Description: Lots 27 and 28, Block 4 of "Sea View Park" Subdivision as recorded at plat book 17, page 80 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida Background Applicant is owner of single family resident (RS -3) and requests approval of 4.55' side setback where 7'6" is required. Analysis The house was built in 1954 and the Applicant wishes to add a studio and florida room to the existing lines of the current structure, which is 4.55' from the side property lira. Applicant is the owner of the vacant lot adjacent to the proposed property (Lot 28) Recommendation As the setback has already been encroached upon by the existing structure,' the proposed addition would continue the building line and would not change the line of visibility from the street. Staff recommends approval of this request. SG /ph c i Of souttl MIMI `.a.;.. PLANNING BOARD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING On Tuesday, August 30 ,'1988, at 7;30 P.M. in the City Commisssion Chambers, the Planning Board of the City of South Miami will conduct a- Public Hearing on the following matter: PB -B$ -015 Applicant: Wayne R. Mitchell Request' Variance to Section 5 -3 -3.02 of the Zoning Ordinance to allow, 5'0" side setback where 7'6" is required. Location: 5911 SW 83 Street Legal Description: Lots 27 and 28, Mock 4 of "Sea View Park" Subdivision as recorded at plat book 17, page 80 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida By this Notice and hearing date of August 30th, 1988, the City hereby advises the public that the prier noticed date of August 23, 1988 is changed and that no `public hearing will occur on August 23rd. YOU ARE HERESY ADVISED THAT IF ANY PERSON DESIRES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEiTIHG OR HARING, SUCH PERSON WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, AND FOR SUCH PURPOSE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PRO - CEEOINGS IS MAOE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE IESTIMONY ANO EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL. IS TO BE SASEO. (or. S. IN. of 05) tLIC H£ARIHG WILL SE HELD IN THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS AT THE CITY HALL, 6130 SUNSET DRIVE, SOUTH M }� FLORIOAI AT THE TIME AND DATE STATED ABOVE. _..— INTERESTED PARTIES ARE URGED TO ATTEND, OBJECTIONS OR EXPRESSIONS OF APPROVAL MAY BE MADE PrRSON AT THE HEARING OR FILED IN WRITING PRIOR To OR AT THE HEARING. THE BOARD RESERVES THE LHT TO RECOMMEND 10 THE CITY COMMISSION WHATEVER THE BOARD CONSIDERS IN THE BEST INTEREST FOR AREA I►tVOLVED. THE SOARD'S RECOMMENDATION ON THIS _MATTER WILL SE HEAND SY THE CITY COMMISSION A FUTURE DATE. INTERESTED PARTIES REQUESTING INFORMATION ARE ASKED TO CONTACT THE, OFFICE OF THE :.,Itd* DIRECTOR SY CALLING «T —i"I OR v WRITING. REFER TO HEARING NUMBER WHEN MAKING tOUtRY. ly �w PLANNING BOARD sn/ ? as REV. II -11-111 THIS IS A COURTESY NOTICE •_. .•_ r �Y.K-- v.r� -.' t�-aR+.. >•,e•. ••sa =Y. t rw�.:.+.ss �t'Ty \itwF.lNi.arfs'.K.c v�cz �a.�= r+i�Tt4ar..l.Z'�6 -�'i t1:'1'R ^.��_1f +.�;.a ZONING REVIEW SHEET a Date o$ f O!fI n _ Project !141?14V(�E S /lam ,fFTB f Address ,'n 11 chi c�3 S'T Owner N./,Qyi✓F R. &/Tc/ -1-L Telephone 4-61.5- Designer hC.&&i? ,,9,2�Q e) 4 Telephone 667 2.2:27 District R5 - , 3 Lot of Record COTS 27 f t9. 8th 4--6r- XAVr,,,v PALK Use permitted No Special Use: Yes Accessory User Yes No Existing Nonconforming Use: Yes CNo% Allowed/Required Proposed Sign Lot Area il,440 Type Proposed Lot Frontage Front Setback 2� _ Side Setback -1fZ Allowed: Yes No Side Corner V14 Size Rear Setback Allowed: Yes No FAR A-114 A114 Building Height 25 Materials Submitted Lot Coverage 3, 4i 3 2 30 Density w/A 1.,14 Land Coverage ,t/(j_ AIM Landscaping AIIAL /VIA Parking Total 2 2 Standard Compact Handicap A1114 Comments: �f}� -Q, u�► �,F,� - -- Reviewed by c5,� q CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI PPI_IOATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE PLANNING BOARD (FOLK IN DUPLICATE) tss APPLICATION MUST BE COMPLETED AND RETURNED, WITH ALL REQUIRED SUPPORTING DATA TO THE OFFICE OF THE )HONG DIRECTOR BEFORE PROCEEDINGS MAY BE STARTED FOR PUBLIC HEARING. 'PLICANT _ // AS (OWNER, TEHANTp AGENT, ETC. SPECIFY) }DRESS OF APPLICANT CITY , STATE ZIP PHONE NRER DATE OWNERSHIP OF PROPERTY OBTAINED 3DR[SS OF OWNER - CITY . STATE ZIP PHONE PROPERTY OPTION OR CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE? MORTGAGEE IS NAME AND ADDRESS YES ✓/ NO APPLICANT... 15 NOT OWNER,, 15 LETTER OF AUTHORITY FROM OWNER ATTACHED? YES NO V/ EGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY COVERED BY APPLICATION 7T(S) Ci BLOCK / J.e D I V I S I O1V iGiFi(/1 -�tD �jT Dl% ..3.�i41/�EGC� /,ga� Op. ETES ANO BOUNDS �ZE OF AREA COVERED BY APPLICATION NAMES AND OFFICIAL. WIDTHS OF ABUTTING P/W S DOITIONAL DEDICATIONS PROPOSED STRUCTURES LOCATED ON PROPERTY .PPLICATION TO THE PLANNING BOARD FOR ACTION ON THE FOLLOWING CHANGE OF ZONING EXCEPTION OTHER (SPECIFY) VARIANCE AMEND SECTION OF CODE 4EENT ZONE CLASSIFICATION CHANGE OF ZONING REQUESTED XPLANATION OF ABOVE �G' �.ac�/�,•t,//�' �'.tiC /sT.it%Cl. /t'E'S ij>Ei[/C? !E FOLLOWING SUPPORTING DATA REQUIRED IS SUBMITTED WITH THIS APPLICATION. (ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE iRT OF APPLICATION. ) ✓ CERTIFIED SURVEY SITE PLAN PHOTOGRAPHS S.TATEIIiENT OF REASONS OR CONDITIONS JUSTIFYING CHANGE REQUESTED V PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN. t✓ HEARING FEE (CASH OR CHECK) OTHER tE UNDERSIGNED HAS READ THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION AND REPRESENTS THE tNFORMATION AND ALL SUPPORTING ATA FURNISHED IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. SIGNATU E OR OFFICE USE ONLY ATE OF HEARING _ _ HEARING NO. 384 REV. -iz -s4 DATE FILED M 4 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, GRANTING A HOME OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, ON PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 69 LESS THE N.10' AND LOT 79 LESS THE N. 5', BLOCK 2, LAWRENCE TERRACE SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED AT PLAT BOOK 47, PAGE 619 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, A /K /A 7511 S.W. 64TH , SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA. AGENDA ITEM PB -88 -020 WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a home occupational license for landscape architecture and the staff recommendation is for approval; and WHEREAS, at a public hearing on October 25, 1988, the Planning Board voted 6 -0 to grant the request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That a home occupational license for landscape architecture on property legally described as: Lot 6, less the N.10' and Lot 7, less the N.51, Block 2, LAWRENCE TERRACE SUBDIVISION, as recorded at Plat Book 47, Page 61, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, A /K /A 7511 S.W. 64TH , South Miami, Florida. hereby granted. PASSED AND ADOPTED this ATTEST: CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY sm. occlicens.res J day of APPROVED MAYOR , 1988. Doris Rosebraugh t I Desigrwl?la w ftW Coasultorat ?.0. Boat 432135 South Miami, Ft 33243 (305) 6674M4 The honorable Mayor, Bill Porter The Honorable Vice Mayor, Carl Sebwait The Honorable Commissioner, Cathy McCann The honorable Commissioner, Janet Launeelott The Honorable Commissioner, Danny Broken The City of South Miami 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, 11L 33143 Dear Mayor Porter and Commissioners: October 19 1988 In spite of positive thinking, the results of an accident in Winn Dixie in May of 1984 has left me with a painful physical bandi- cap and I'seek compassionate relief from the city I love and serve in the for- of a'Home Occuvation license. With the need to administer moist heat, periodic bed rest or warm baths to r€'aave painful spasm and pressure on the sciatic nerve brought on by the physical rigors of the job of landscape designer, I find I an unable to work in conventional office space. My work takes me out of my bone to the job sites of my clients and at no time do 2 pursue any business acitivity that would include traffic to and from my bome. My office equipment sufficient for designing landscapes is the drawing board, telephone and small table. The large studio attached to my boat was °once used by Joan Wilson for weaving and I use the remainder to store my personal horticultural librarq, slide collection and materials used for part_, time teaching wbiebJ s performed at the individual schools. it is imperative that I continue working in order to survive as I am n,ow alone and my sole source of support. By the aforementioned home treatments and chiropractic care, aided by pain killers when needed, I am able to continue my practice and support myself. Thankfully, Mature gives" us: balance and the creative and knowledge side of my life has one S improved. Your help in this difficult and challenging time of my life will be deeply appreciated. Sincerely, Doris Rosebraugh Landscape Designer J�� y . ; 6I70 w Ot is n 1401 f • �p' ;:DO jr 4 74 Na C v AW Nil 0 NN 1411 ! a 2ri ' c •7440 N41 � � ?fJ0 �� b I 1 R� 6491 SS ! D+4 No �+�, 750 7301 7 f ! 7500 15,V .7371 , . � � 7570 7571 { 7531 7&V ci / o 7611 ti " y� {7600b y � r t /�3J /39•i9 `ci it7 • W Ta ?D 's'rs• 2 6 1dJJ i 12� 13��y► n // 4S 07 '1 @ , 13 .� •.0 �t (� � � � 163!1 _ � J63J 14 7647 14 j . 42 .00 iZ4 8s b 94 765u 7661 �� --• . _-- o APPLICANT: Ow�v"E R : �rvo.Sc b r MAP REFERENCE: •757�I Compass CC�CIIFNTS: Rome Li c tvS a Scale . A/. 7..5. CITY Dato..10,1.0, Ci 1 T Y OF U t �S.+�..Chk.... . W lQMI Drn, � �IAUi���G �0 Hearing No . Pb.P$_62o .a • tHE titY Of SOUA 4AiaMi g%3# sumsET o111Vt, 90uTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 14116 �'ViNItC ltR%"C; 09PARTM[MT 2 0 N I N G P I T I T I O N Property Description, Location and legal: Lot 6 less the Worth 10' feet and the North 5'feet of Lot ?, Block 2, LAWRENCE TERRACE, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 47, at Page 61, of the Public Records of Dade Counts, Florida Request: The Owners of the above property have made the following request: Home Occupation License based on physical hardship, see copy of attached letter to the Commission of the City of South Miami, FL. Petition: We, the undersigned property owners, are within 300 feet of the above property. We understand and approve the above request. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- ZJA 7 (continued on page 2) Page 1 (ok - &- (continued on page 2) Page 1 4 f Z O N I N G P 8 2 I? I O N " (continued) Petition: We$ the undersigned property owners, are within 300 feet of the abov* property. We understand and approve the above request. - - - - - - • - )J)- ----------------- Ae�o Tsar _ 7 �G��a`- � - - - - - - - 7 vrl t_ sj�? -_L_�_ C�z �►�!�►- ��3fsr� I •- -- - - - - - - - - - I L(%+ S i J � • T - - _ - S/ - b3_ - - -- - - - -• -- - - - - -- - - • -- - - - - • - - - - -- - -- - - - -- - - -- - - - - -- •-------- - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - -- • • - r - - - _ - _ - - s s • s - • - - -. _ - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - -. - - - - - - _ L - - - - • -: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - • - - • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - -. - s - • - - • - _ _ • - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 37 }`..,1 ' - - - - s r _ • - - - - - - - - - • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - s • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i - • •. - - - - - - - - - - - - - Page 2 atu of South Want PLANKING BOARD NOT]CE Of PUBLlC tfi�ARtNG On Tuesday, October 25, 1488 at 7:30 PM, the Planning Board Of the City of South Miani will conduct a Public Bearing on the folloving matter: PB -88 -020 Applicant: Doris ltosebraugh Request: Borne Occupational License to practice landscape architecture in home office. Locations 7511 Ski 64 Ct Legal Description: Lot 6 Less the North 10 Feet and the North 5 Feet of Lot 7, Block 2, of "Lawrence Terrace" Subdivision. According to the Plat thereof, as Recorded in Plat Book 47 at Page 61 of Public Records of Dade County, Florida. YON AMC I/ERtSY ADVISED THAT If ANY PERSON DEsines TO APPISAL ANY DECISION MAO9 WITH awsp CT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MERTINO OR NEARIk*0 SUCH PERSON WILL NEEO A RECORO OV TI49 PROCEEDINGS, ANO FOR SUCH PURPOSE MAY NEED To cmSVRE TIIAT A VCROATIM RECORD OF THE PRO - CEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TEST'""Y AND.EVIDENCE LWON WHICH THE AprCAL Ii TO •C SASEs, (rs s• loi.014l) ,V&LIO HEARING WILL St FIELD IN T14C COMMISSION CHAMOCR . AT THE CITY HALL# 4130 S%MSET ORIVC* SOW" -AIAI+II. P1.ORIDA9 AT THE TIME AND DATE STATED ASOVE. JkLL /NTCRESTEO PARTIES ARE URGED TO ATTCNO, OSJECTIONS OR EXPRESSIONS O: APPROVAL MAY 0E MADE .!4 rcRSOH AT THE HEARING OR ♦ILEO IN WRITING PRIOR TO 011 AT THE NEARING. THE BOARD RESERVES THE 41014T TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COMMISSION WHATEVER THE OOARD CONSIDERS IN THE BEST INTEREST FOR Twit AREA INVOLVED, THE SOAROIS RECOMMENDATION ON THIS MATTER WILL SE HCARO OY THE CITY COMMISSION ►VTURE DATE, INTERESTED PARTIES REOVESTING INFORMATION ARE ASKED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OW THE AT A :oNtHo DIRECTOR sY CALLING K7 -501 OR sY WRITING. REFER TO NEARING NUMBER W14EN MAKING INQUIRY, PLANNING BOARD .ss1a� -I •s REV. 11 -+-I1 THIS IS A COURTESY NOTICE r -- i s�.\w. 64 cr. to /floor plan �— t • wire loth and stucco Of extern surfoces I/3" �f PC wa;"�o '� 6 � MOTION: Mr. Carver moved for approval of the request, to approve the subdivision of property, waiving the regular platting procedure and granting the variance from Zoning Ordinance Section 5 -3 -3.01 to allow two lots with Tess than 75 foot frontage. Mr. Ligammare seconded the motion. i VOTE: Approve: 4 Oppose: 2 The motion was approved. i PB -88 -019 Applicant: Doctors Optical of South Miami Request: Variance to allow a window identification sign for a building where no window identification sign is currently allowed. Location: 6262 Sunset Drive (Advance Tower) Legal Description: - Lot 1 lens North 25 ft. for Right- of -Way and all of Lots 2,3,4, and 5, William A. Hobbs Subdivision, Plat Book 4, Page 111, Public Records of Dade County Florida. Mr. Hoffmann stated that he had to recluse himself from being Chairman due to the fact that the Applicant is his eye doctor. John Andrews became the Acting Chairman for this PB -88 -019. Mr. Gerry Funari, signed in and addressed the Board. He said he opened one year ago. Formerly, UniGlobe Travel Agency had the 1,000 sq. ft. on the lobby floor. He said the Agency received a permit to place one sign in the window. -8_ i i PB -88 -020 Applicant: Doris Rosebraugb Request: Hone Occupational License to practice landscape architecture In hose office. Location: 7511 S.W. 64 Ct. Legal Description: Lot 6 less the North 10 ft. and the forth 5 ft. of Lot 7, Block 2 of "Lawrence Terrace" Subdivision. According to the Plat thereof, as Recorded in Plat Book 47 at Page 61 of Public Records of Dade County , Florida. Ms. Rosebraugh, signed in an addressed the Board. She said she would like the Board to grant her a Home Occupational License to practice landscape architecture in her home. She said she is a landscape designer and a teacher. She said she suffered a back injury and can't physically maintain an office. She stated that her business is very quite and she goes to her clients. She will only be using her drafting board and a telephone in the studio that she has. She asked the Board to allow her to continue earning a living. Mr. Hoffmann opened the Public Hearing. Mr. Robert Jacobra, signed in an addressed the Board,stating that he is Ms. Rosebraugh's neighbor. He stated that she is a loving person and would like her to continue being his neighbor. He said he would like the Board to approve her petition. Mr. Hoffmann asked for -staff report. Mrs. Goudarzi stated that staff recommends approval to the request. MOTION: Mr. Adrews moved for approval. Mr. Ligammare seconded the motion. VOTE: Approve: 6 Oppose: 0 -11 15- Citu of South Miami INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Harien Aran- Sprinrad DATE: October 25, 1988 Director, Building, Zoning and Community Development cAOM: : STAFF REPORT SUBJECT Soheil darzi ' � PB -88 -020 Planner HOME OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE General Applicant: Doris Rosebraugh Request: Home Occupational License to practice landscape architecture in home office. Location: 7511 S.W. 64 Ct. Legal Description: Lot 6 Less the North 10 Feet and the North 5 Feet of Lot 7, Block 2, of "Lawrence Terrace" Subdivision. According to the Plat thereof, as Recorded in Plat Book 47 at Page 61 of Public. Records of Dade County, Florida. Back &round Applicant is the owner of single family home in RS -3 District and request approval of Home Occupational License to practice landscape architecture in her home office. Analysis The activity will be conducted by a person residing on the premises; no other person will be employed. The activity will not generate any unsual amount of vehicular and /or pedestrian traffic. Recommendation The request complies with the zoning regulations of the City of South Miami (Ordinance No. 5 -74 -801). Staff recommends approval of the request. CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 'L,ICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE PLANNING BOARD (FoLE IN DUPLICATE) APPLICATION MUST BE COMPLETED AND RETVRNC% WITH ALL REQUIRED SUPPORTING DATA TO THE OFFICE OF THE ,•.n namKCTOR BEFORE PROCEEDINGS MAY Be STARTED FOR PUBLIC HEARING. ANT t AS CoWNER/ TENANT/ AGENT/ ETC, SPECIFY) � Q %990 OF APPLI T / GTY it TA ZIP R447-oosl INI �/ 3 EN DATE OWNERSHIP OP PROPERTY OSTAINEO mt$$ 011, OWNER CITY STATE ZIP PHONE •IIOPERTY OPTION OR CONTRACT FOR PURCHASET O jGAGVC S NAMIF fM i. DRESS oAt YES NO Ftt ``tt �PPl1CANT IS NOT OWNER/ IS EER OF AUTHORITY FROM OWNER ATTACHEOT VIES NO ,;AL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY COVERED BY APPLICATION J 1�. 7 7 Oc is i iJ! i YL O K • DIVISION r k+ L T/ fas AND SOUNDS `WHsL records 1 PQ_fe 5�^ �a/ E OF AREA COVERED BY APPLICATION 'NAMES AND OFFICIAL WIDTHS OF ABUTTING q1W S 3fT /DNAL DEDICATIONS PROPOSED STRUCTURES LOCATED ON PROPERTY PLICATION TO THE PLANNING BOARD FOR ACTION ON THE FOLLOFOLLOWING: i CHANGE OF ZONING EXCEPTION tkom& ��GChfif i OTHER (SPECIFY) VARIANCE AMEND SECTION OF CODE LENT ZONE CLASSIFICATION CHANGE OF ZONING REQUESTED Rs- 3 t LANATION OF ABOYE 1 % • i P 1 FOLLOWING SUPPORTING DATA REQUIRED IS SUBMITTED WITH THIS APPLICATION. (ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE T OF APPLICATION. ) CERTIFIED SURVEY Vl000, SITE PLAN PHOTOGRAPHS STATC#'EHT OF REASONS OR CONDITIONS JUSTIFYING CHANGE REQUESTED pROPOSED FLOOR PLAN HEARING FEE (CASH OR CHECK) OTHER UNDERSIGNED HAS READ THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION AND REPRESENTS THE INFORMATION AND ALL SUPPORTING TA iuRNISHEO IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE AND SE EF. • SIGNATURE ,R OFFICE USE ONLY TE OF HEARING - 1100 -21 REV. 3-12 -» r HEARING NO. DATE FILED >. .., RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, GRANTING` A VARIANCE TO ALLOW AN ILLUMINATED WINDOW SIGN IN A C-2 DISTRICT WHERE SUCH SIGN IS NOT PERMITTED, ON PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 75 -79, W.A. LARKINS SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED AT PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 198, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA A /K /A 7306 RED ROAD, SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA.' AGENDA ITEM PB -88 -021 WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a variance to allow an illuminated window sign in a C -2 _district and the staff recommendation is for approved; and WHEREAS, at a public hearing on October 25, 1988, the Planning Board voted 6 -0 to grant the request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That a variance to allow an illuminated window.sign in a C -2 district on property legally described as: Lots 75 -79, W.A. LARKINS SUBDIVISION, as recorded at Plat Book 3, Page 198, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, a /k /a 7306 Red Road, South Miami, Florida. is hereby granted. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1988. APPROVED: MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY sm. illuwindow.res AM" C1ty of South Miami PLANNING BOARD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 1 On Tuesday, October 25, 1988 at 7:30 PH, the Planning Board of the City of South Miami will conduct a Public Bearing on the following matter: PB -88 -021 Applicant: Strictly Tennis, Inc. Request: Variance to Section 6- 3 -7 -.08 to allow an illuminated window sign in C -2 District, where it is not allowed. Location: 7306 Red Road Legal Description: Lots 75, 76, 77, 78 and 79 of "W.A. Larkins" Subdivision. According to the Plat thereof, as Recorded in Plat Book 3, at Page 198 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. YOU ARE HEREBY ADVISED THAT IF ANY PERSON DESIRES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING OR HEARING, SUCH PERSON WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, AND FOR SUCH PURPOSE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PRO - CEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL Is TO BE BASED. (r.11, 2$$. 0105 UBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD IN THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS AT THE CITY HALL, $150 SUNSET DRIVE, SOUTH OAMI, FLORIDA, AT THE TIME AND DATE STATED ABOVE. .LL INTERESTED PARTIES ARE URGED TO ATTEND. OBJECTIONS OR EXPRESSIONS OF APPROVAL MAY BE MADE V PERSON AT THE HEARING OR FILED IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR. AT THE HEARING* THE BOARD RESERVES THE IGHT TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COMMISSION WHATEVER THE BOARD CONSIDERS IN THE BEST INTEREST FOR HE AREA INVOLVED. THE BOARDIS RECOMMENDATION ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE CITY COMMISSION T A FUTURE DATE. INTERESTED PARTIES REQUESTING INFORMATION ARE ASKED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE of THE oHING DIRECTOR BY CALLING 447 -5691 OR BY WRITING. REFER TO HEARING NUMBER WHEN MAKING `40UIRY. 58100 -1 ez REV. 12 -9-61 PLANNING BOARD THIS IS A COURTESY NOTICE r/7/ -1 3 f _ 3Oe h 40' 1 8 S{IS PG666� 57 51' 57 5Z f p /0 0.9 8 % 0; -I. I4 7;11 h v V% . 733 722 0 .f Pte`' •'y �•' , �6 r 4 7- 5 $� r 37•> 1 i -- - . . J i� ::. X7321 _ 3' 40' w „ .. • ` /46' AO b:.J.O! Acrt4s;� I 0 J4/4C.T (: .�. = Ot tZ .. E � • K N 7 F= o t1G 1g " .. ..;. ,�• .. Asa r •, . . .. APPLICANT: Strictly Tennis, Inc. % Steve Tandlich I OWNER: Steve Hessen Real Estate MAP REFERENCE- 7306 Red Road CC.%MNTS : Variance to allow a neon sign where none is allowed. C! TY of MOW MIAMI A* PLANNING 50A RD Compass scale. A" =3'.... . Date ... IQ-7-.84 .... Drn . DRH .. Chk ..... Fearing No.PB- 88;021 Z O N I N G P E T I T I O N Property Description, Location and Legal: Request: The Owners of the above property have made the following request: TO :ri (0-44.4. neft S%4 tiff �n h� wV I qJw O f 3a� R E p 1Q 0. �tition: We, the undersigned property owners, are within 300 feet of the above property. We understand and approve the above request. NAME DATE ADDRESS 1,V1dYL-Z1*77U /V A?0 Ai _` - - - - -- -- _�� - - - -- - - -- q -3- - . :- - - - - -- fo ��46' cri) SPA'' _ 3a 8A' WOO - - - - -- g�3.4_I__-7Vo_,.z. -- - - -- 4�11' A/Z " - 7- -y- �-o - A- "/- X- - - - - - - - - 4;J nse_ _ - - - - - - - - - - 73- PWSO -37 (continued on page 2) Page 1 6 Z O N I N G P E T I T I O N (continued) Petition: We, the undersigned property owners, are within 300 feet of the above property. We understand and approve the above request. ins, c� .� 4tit F'7'.4xO V27 - - �� 4i A� A*1'Q 13143 - - - -- - - -- - - -- - - Wl _ - - I Via- _ _ _ - 1- Jlaf- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PW50 -37 Page 2 Z O N I N G P E T I T I O N Property Description, Location and Legal: Request: The Owners of the above property have made the following request Q T Yi S7 4- L;� ro - tition: We, the undersigned property owners, are within 300 feet of the above property. We understand and approve the above request. RAME DATE ADDRESS `} ao -5'�� b ? Ii�tsiJ 331ES - - - - - - f - ---- -- - - ------------------ - - - - - - - - - - -- -__ -- - ?WSO -37 (continued on page 2)) Page 1 General Applicants Strictly Tennis, Inc. (Steve Tandlich) Request: variance from Section 6 -3 -7.08 of the Zoning Ordinance to allow an illuminated window sign in C -2 District, where it is not allowed. Location: 7306 Red Road Legal Description: Lots 75,76,77,78 and 79 of "W.A.Larkins" Subdivision', according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 3, at Page 198 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Background Applicant is the owner of a business located in C -2 District and requests approval of variance to allow a neon sign on the window of his business to identify it. Chronology of the Request August 2, 1988 9:00 AM, the Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB) denied the sign for aesthetic reasons. - August 2, 1988 at 7:30 PM, the City Commission instructed the Administration to discontinue the practice, established about years ago, to allow neon signs in the C-2 District at the discretion of the ERPB. - September 6, 1988, the ERPB approved the aesthetics of the sign conditional on an administrative appeal to the City Commission. According to the ERPB Minutes of September 6, 1988, Staff Report PB -88 -021 10 -25 -88 Meeting s "Ms. Aran- Spinrad said this Applicant appeared before the Board approximately a_ month ago and his request was denied for aesthetic reasons. She said the very same night that the Applicant appeared before this Board, the City Commission, decided that the practice to allow neon signs in C -2 district be discontinued. She said that regardless of this Board's decision, she will put forth an administrative appeal to the City Commission." - September 19, 1988, the City Commission granted an administrative appeal from a decision of the ERPB which means no permit can be issued for the sign. (Resolution No. 153 -88- 7066) - Now the Applicant is requesting a variance for his sign. Analysis According to Section 6 -2 -4 of the Zoning Ordinance "No sign shall be either directly or indirectly illuminated unless specifically permitted within the district regulations ". The only illuminated signs which are allowed in Downtown Commercial (C -2) are: one hanging sign, one projecting sign and two directional signs. The proposed sign is not adaptable to any of the above mentioned signs. Section 6 -3 -7.08 of the Zoning Ordinance allows one permanent widow sign upon approval of the ERPB. Such a sign is not allowed to be illuminated in the C-2 district. Before the August 2, 1988 instructions of the City Commission, neon signs were allowed in the C -2 district. Records indicate that as early as 1979, the City issued permits for neon signs in the C -2 District. (Attached are examples of illuminated signs which were approved without obtaining any variances. The Applicant feels that he was not treated equally as others who applied for neon sign permits in the past. Also, he claims that no ordinance or resolution has been passed in regard to neon signs that distinguish his request from the others. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of this request, since the application was submitted prior to the City Commission's decision of August 2, 1988 and to maintain equal treatment under law. SG /Attachment y a a PB -88 -016 Applicant: Strictly Tennis, Inc. Request: Variance to Section 6 -3 -7.08 to allow an illuminated window sign in C -2 District, Where it is not allowed. Location: 7306 Red Road Legal Description: Lots 75,76,77,78 and 79 of "W.A. Larkins" Subdivision. According to the Plat thereof, as Recorded in Plat Book 3, at Page 198 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Mr. Steve Tandlick, signed in an addressed the Board as the owner of Strictly Tennis. He explained the events which have occured to this date. In Jan. 88 he relocated his business to 7306 Red Road primarily due to the signage permitted in this area. He applied for ERPB in August which was denied due to aesthetic reasons. When he tried to resubmit his application for ERPB, he was told by the Zoning Department they could not accept his application. He was then informed that the City Commission had recently decided they would no longer allow neon signs in C -2 District which, includes Mr. Tandiick's business. After several discussions with the BUD Department it was decided to allow Mr. Tandlick to appear before the ERPB and present his revised plans. These plans were approved with modifications, but the approved was overturned by the City Commission; and now a variance is required. Mr. Tandlick feels he should be grandfathered in, due to the fact that he originally applied before the City Commission decision. Mr. Tandlick informed the Board the other tenants in this development have ,several neon signs. The Board reviewed and discussed the drawings. Mrs. Goudarzi, said the staff recommends approval of-the sign, since it was submitted prior to the City Commission decision of Aug. 2, 1988 to maintain equal treatment under the law for this applicant. MOTION: Mr. Gutierrez moved for approval on the request. Ms. Kraich seconded the motion. VOTE: Approve: b Oppose: 0 -12- Dears Sirs, 1 10/1/88 I Steve Tandlich, the officer of Strictly Tennis have Applied to recieve a variance to install a neon sign at 7306 Red Rd. This sign would hang in the front window as do the neon signs of my 5 direct neighbors in the same building. My sign would be simpler, and smaller than my neigbmrs.'' I have been a resident of this area for many years, and have been in business for 14 years, serving the community with good service and products. I'have had hard luck finding a good location. .After 4 moves in the last 7 years, I have finally found an excellent location only blocks from my previous one. I have moved at a great expense, but feel this location will be mfr best.-,.ever. I felt this was a good business decision based on the look of the building and the avail - able signagelike my neighbors exhibited. I inquired at City hall where I was given an application and told what was needed to get my neon sign permit. "A permit is given when you follow these instructions" I ' was told. There were no problems that anyone could see at this time 7 Maybe you will have to change the size. of the letters" I was told( which I later did.)My application was submitted the morning before the City Commission instructed the Administration to discontinue accepting; neon sign applications, which Rad been a Tong established practice of allowing neon signs in the C -2 district. I hoped to use the same available signs as exhibited by my neighbors, and feel that I am being put at a business disadvantage at this time. The decision by the City Commiss was passed on to the Administration; that they%hould not accept a more applications for neon signs ;came at .a later date than my application and my neighbors:,:applications. 7306 Red Rood * Miami. Poido 33143 . 305.666-6067 -- No io /i /ss My business decision was based on reeievigg equal treatment under the existing law, and equal treatment in-the way the law has been upheld.I hope I have not offended anyone by submitting this application for this sign again under a hardship request.. I truly feel that my sign conforms very well with my building and it's present look. My neighbors have told me that these signs have hepped thekr small businesses greatly, and I hope you give me the same chance. I have been very willing to change my sign to conform to City requests, and at present, upon second review, the Enviremental Review & Preservation Board has approved my neon sign. Thank you for your consideration, Sincerely, /C i 7306 Red Rood • Miami, Ronda 33143 0 305- 666.6067 M40 - '13TENE 6 REAL ESTATE 7380 Red Road So. Miami, Florida 33143 13©61886.7884 Stew Heston ROW Estate Steve Hessen Cont. Co.. Me. Dolphin Corot. Co., Inc. A.D.P., hoc. City of South Miami 6130 Sunset Dr. S. Miami, F1. 33143 Sept. 30, 1988 RE: Strictly Tennis Neon Sign Dear City of South Miami: Steve Hessen Co. of Florida approves of the neon sign being applied for by Strictly Tennis. This approval is contingent upon Strictly Tennis obtaining the neccessary permits and approvals from the City of South Miami and the E.R.B. Board. Yours very truly Andrew J. Hessen Steve Hessen Co. of Florida AJH /ah t APPROVED ` BY ERPB ON ILLUMINATED SIGN ADDRESS 02 -06 -79 THE FORCE BOUTIQUE 5887 S.W. 73 ST. 11-17-81 CHILDREN BODY SHOP 5884 Sunset Dr. 08-07 -84 RAGGEDY'S 5826 Sunset Dr. 07 -02 -85 DANCE N THINGS 5830 Sunset Dr. 07 -02 -85 MR I'S OPTICAL 5817 Sunset Dr. 11-05 -85 AT EASE 5844 Sunset Dr. 01-07 -86 ALEXANDER'S OF AUSTRALIA 5893 Sunset Dr. 04 -01 -86 THE COOK SHOP 7251 S.W. 57 :Ct. 04 -01 -86 LINGERIE PLUS OF SUNSET 5742 Sunset Dr. 04 -15 -86 RUMORS 5863 Sunset Dr. 07 -15 -86 FOOT WORK 5724 Sunset Dr. 07 -15 -88 LONG'S 5880 Sunset Dr. 11 -18 -86 BEN & JERRY'S 5812 Sunset Dr. 12 -02 -86 DESIGNS N THINGS 7245A S.W. 57 Ct. 08 -04 -87 PHOTO FLASH 1 HOUR DELIVERY 7320 Red Road 08 -18 -87 ALICES PAY -OFF BEACH WEAR 5900 Sunset Dr. 10 -06 -87 PET COUNTRY 5863 Sunset Dr. 10 -20 -87 LOTTU'S 'FLORIST 5794 Sunset Dr. 12 -01 -87 DISCOUNT PERFUMES 7230A Red Road 03 -01 -88 PAPER PAPER PAPER BOUTIQUE 7346 'Red Road 06-07 -88 SIMONS & GREEN 5842 Sunset Dr. 01 -U5 -88 MARRIA JUELLE 5881 Sunset Dr. JEPEWAY AND JEPEWAY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW ad V { SUITE 407 SISCAYNE •UILOiNG LOWS 64 JEPEWAY 19 WEST rLAGLER STREET LOUIS M JEPEWAY JR. MIAMI. PLORiOA 33130 w TtLEPMONE (305) 377.2356 October 11, 1988 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: We have no objection to allowing Mr. Steve Tandlich of Strictly Tennis hanging a small neon sign in the window of his business. Very truly yours, _✓Louis M. t'epeway, `Jr. on behalf of the owners of the Crossroads Building /pY 6 DR. HERBERT S. LEVIN 7400 S. 57 Count SOUTH MIAW. FL*mwA 33143 $61-1763 ed - row —IT L v E-- o lo "I o r,/ A L " a t,' i N- &- (vt L) ry f— N, t L tl/ I v'! ti I'v —f2 lk 'T1 7C3 m Z to j, 0 — G} n t-< ` 70 7� rn ,paw C/f Z Z w tf' er't iV•' * Vi czrn. Ul .v o cn o Is �\ +� �J Cs CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI kPPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE PLANNING BOARD (FILE IN DUPLICATE) �H /S APPLICkTl*64 �WST BE COMPLETED AND RETURNED/ WITH ALL REQUIRED SUPPORTING DATA TO THE OFFICE OF TMIE :ONtNG OtRECTOR BEFORE PROCEEDINGS MAY BE STARTED FOR PUBLIC HEARING. ,PPLti?'CAAIT ic 1 `-� � � / S � I�.( . gr �'7 (f� AS (OW E TENANTS )GENTS ETC. SPECIFY) .OQREff 0 ;/1�PPLiCAN1 1 Y 1 { >Y TE ✓. t PH� )WHEN 1t.i` DATE OWNERSHIP OF PROPERTY OBTAINED /4t�� sDDR WNE �3? 50.? 1 � CITY ^.+.'ct4. �1 a �� Z%� ST E 33111- PH S PROPERTY O ON Or, CONTRACT FOO PURCHASE? T-1410—IRT G AGEE IS NAME AND ADDRESS YES �� NO F APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, IS LETTER OF AUTHORITY FROM OWNER .ATTACHED? V YES NO _EGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY COVERED BY APPLICATION OT(S) � �- %�i 75 �! BLOCK >USDIVISION 4ARkJI45 PS / LQ IF IETES AND BOUNDS OF AREA COVERED BY APPLICATION OhtAL DEDICATIONS PROPOSED NAMES AND OFFICIAL WIDTHS OF ABUTTING R /'WIS STRUCTURES LOCATED ON PROPERTY .ICATION TO THE PLANNING BOARD FOR ACTION ON THE .FOYL.LOIWING: CHANGE OF ZONIMG EXCEPTION VARIANCE AMEND SECTION OF CODE PRi --rNT ZONE CLASSIFICATION CHANGE OF ZONING REQUESTED EXPLANATION OF ABOVE OTHER (SPECIFY) THE FOLLOWING SUPPORTING DATA REQUIRED IS SUBMITTED WITH THIS APPLICATION. (ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE PART OF APPLICATION.) CERTIFIED SURVEY SITE PLAN PHOTOGRAPHS STATEatiENT OF REASONS OR CONDITIONS JUSTIFYING CHANGE REQUESTED PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN HEARING FEE (CASH OR CHECK) OTHER THE UNDERSIGNED HAS READ THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION AND REPRESENTS THE INFORMATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DATA FURNIS14EO IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE A L-VJ—t a SIGNATURE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY DATE OF HEARING _�?s'J' 1 2'.2 Z %54cosl. _ HEARING NO, 0 paoloo -11 REV. 3-1: -n DATE FILED 4 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, GRANTING A WAIVER OF PLAT AND ALLOWING TWO LOTS WITH A FRONTAGE OF 40' WHERE 75' ARE REQUIRED ON PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE S. 264' OF THE NORTH 490.92' OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE S.W. 1/4 OF THE S.W. 1/4 OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 54 S. , RANGE 40 E. LESS THE W. 351 OF LAND SITUATED IN DADE COUNTY FLORIDA, A /K /A 6851 S.W. 67TH AVE., SOUTH MAIMI, FLORIDA. AGENDA ITEM PB -88 -017 WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a waiver of plat and to allow two lots with 40' frontage where 75' is required, and the staff recommendation is for apporval; and WHEREAS, at a public hearing on October 25, 1988 the Planning Board voted 4 -2 to grant the requests. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That a waiver of plat and to allow two lots with 401 frontage where 75' is required on property legally described as: The S. 264' of the North 490.92' of the West 1/2 of the West 1/2 of the S.W. 1/4 of the S.W. 1/4 of SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 54 S., Range 40 E. Less the W. 35' of land situated in Dade County Florida, A /K /A 6851 S.W. 67TH AVE., South Miami, Florida. is hereby granted. Section 2. This apporval is conditioned upon proper street dedications and compliance with Chapter 17 of the Code of Ordianaees of the City of South Miami and is further conditioned upon Dade County approval and requirements. PASSED AND ADOPTED this ATTEST: CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY sm.waiverplat day of , 1988. APPROVED: MAYOR 32ZO &(0 80 72: 0 TRACT/ 722 O Z Sc� ZE � oo' APPLICANT: Stephen Roth OWNER* Betty McCrimmon, Edward and Barbara Sax MAP REFERENCE: 6851 S.W. 67 Ave. -Cy..•TNTS: Requests for: 1) Approval of subdivision 2) Variance to allow two lots with less than 75 foot frontages. ATY al: MUTU IMAMI f PUNNING BOARD T •� c(i •. :` Compess Scale .a$ show.a .. . Date - IQ— .66 -$Ss . . . Dr ARH .. Chk . . Hearing No.p .B.-88rO17 s x j 32ZO &(0 80 72: 0 TRACT/ 722 O Z Sc� ZE � oo' APPLICANT: Stephen Roth OWNER* Betty McCrimmon, Edward and Barbara Sax MAP REFERENCE: 6851 S.W. 67 Ave. -Cy..•TNTS: Requests for: 1) Approval of subdivision 2) Variance to allow two lots with less than 75 foot frontages. ATY al: MUTU IMAMI f PUNNING BOARD T •� c(i •. :` Compess Scale .a$ show.a .. . Date - IQ— .66 -$Ss . . . Dr ARH .. Chk . . Hearing No.p .B.-88rO17 i- e x 7 LETTER OF INTENT FOR CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 1. This application Is for two adjacent properties. The northern half is owned by Edward and Barbara Sax, while the southern half is owned by Betty McCrimmon. Both properties are under contract to be sold to Stephen Roth or a corporation controlled by Mr. Roth, who proposes to subdivide this property into six (6) single family lots. 2. The applicant seeks to build six, 2 story, 3000 square foot single family residences on 1.8 acres of land in the City of South Miami. The residences will be arranged around a privately owned and maintained cui -de -sac street accessible through security gates from Ludlam Road. A decorative wall will be built along Ludlam Road, SW 66 Avenue and portions of the north and south property lines. It will unify the subdivision and provide an attractive, identifiable image. A 25 foot strip will be dedicated to the City on the east side of the property to complete the 5166 Avenue right of way. The existing sidewalk along Ludlam Road will be extended. 3. Although the applicant could provide 6 conventionally shaped, rectangular lots requiring no variences on this parcel, he proposes instead to build a more attractive, self contained subdivision around a cul -de -sac. By grouping all 6 homes around the cul- de-sac instead of through street, there will be no traffic impact on existing SW 66 Avenue. The lotting pattern, however, that results from the cul -de -sac creates a geometry hardship and standard lot frontage requirements cannot be met for 2 proposed Cul -de -sac lots. Variences are needed from section 5 -3 -3.01 to allow frontage of less than 75 feet for these lots. 4. The visual quality of the proposed subdivision and streetscape has not been compromised due to the requested variances. In fact, the approval of these variances will allow the applicant to proceed with a more attractive subdivision. Stephen Roth P � �.�v _ _ a , g . r r'. 'r: - .. .L r S-�_ = .r�nii.- �':.y`�'► . :G.l ••►tl Sr-: _ ., �: ��s..i..l� - City of SOUth Miami PLANNING BOARD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING On Tuesday, October 25, 1988 at 7 :30 PM, the Planning Board of the City of South Miami will conduct a Public Hearing on the following matter: PB -88 -017 Applicants: Stephen Roth, Betty McCrimmon, Edward and Barbara Sax Request Approval of the subdivision of the subject property, waiving the regular platting procedure. Request #2: Variance from Zoning Ordinance Section 5 -3 -3.01 to allow two lots with less than 75 foot frontage. Location: 6851 SW 67 Ave Legal Description: The South 15 of the South 264 feet of the North 490.92 feet of the West h of the West h of the SW 3% of the SW Ix' of Section 25, Township 54 South, Range 40 East, less the West 35 feet thereof, lying and being in Dade County Florida. And% The North 15 of the South 264 feet of the North 490.92 feet of the West � of the West 3i of the SW h of the SW 14 of Section 25, Township 54 South, Range 40 East, less the West 35 feet thereof, lying and being in Dade County, Florida. YOU ARE HEREBY ADVISED THAT IF ANY PERSON OESIRES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING OR HEARING, SUCH PERSON WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCLEDINGS, AND FOR SUCH PURPOSE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PRO - CEEDINGS 18 MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO Bt QASEO. (F. S. a", 0105) _IC HEARINQ WILL BE HELD IN THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS AT THE CITY HALL, 6170 SUNSET DRIVE, SOUTH Al, FLORIDA, AT THE TIME AND DATE STATED ABOVE. . INTERESTED PARTIES ARE URGED TO ATTEND. OBJECTIONS OR EXPRESSIONS OF APPROVAL MAY HE MADE ERSON AT THE HEARING OR FILED IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE HEARING, THE BOARD RESERVES THE T TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COMMISSION WHATEVER THE BOARD CONSIDERS IN THE BEST INTEREST FOR AREA INVOLVED. THE BOARD'S RECOMMENDATION ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE CITY COMMISSION FUTURE DATE. INTERESTED PARTIES REQUESTING INFORMATION ARE ASKED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE '40 DIRECTOR BY CALLING 667 1:691 OR BY WRITING. REFER TO HEARING NUMBER WHEN MAKING 11RY. 7 0-7 BI REV. Q -9-11 PLANNING BOARD THIS IS A COURTESY NOTICE d Y City of South Miami a INTER— OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Marien Aran - Spinrad DATE, October 25, ,1988 Director, Building, Zoning and Community Development FROM: David Henderson suejEcTPB -88 -017 Planning Technician Applicants: Stephen Roth, Betty McCrimmon, Edward & Barbara Sax Property Address: 6851 SW 67 Ave. Legal Description: The South 1/2 of the South 264 ft. of the North 490.92 ft. of the West 1/2 of the West 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 25, Township 54 South, Range 40 East, less the West 35 ft. thereof, lying and being in Dade County, Florida. And: The North 1/2 of the South 264 ft. of the North 490.92 ft. of the West 1/2 of the West 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 25, Township 54 South, Range 40 East, less the West 35 ft. thereof, lying and being in Dade County, Florida. Request #1: Approval of the subdivision of the subject property. Request #2: Variance from Zoning Ordinance Section 5 -3 -3.01 to allow two lots with less than 75 ft. frontages. Background /Analysis Applicants are the present owners and a gentleman who has a contract to purchase the subject property. Applicants propose a six -lot subdivision with access provided by a privately owned and maintained access easement. A variance is required to allow two lots that do not have the required lot frontage. Each aspect of the proposed subdivision and variance request is analyses below. ,l A " Variance for Use of Seotic Tanks Applicants have requested and received variance from Dade County's Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) for use of septic tanks within the proposed subdivision. Landscaping The new access easement will require the removal of at leant one ficus tree from the SW 67 Ave. side of the subdivision. No permit for tree removal shall be issued until Applicants comply with the requirements of the new Dade County Tree Removal- Ordinance, including any requirements for replacement landscaping. Recommendation Because sidewalks exist to the south of the proposed subdivision along SW 66 and 67 Avenues, Staff recommends that these sidewalks be continued along the outside of the proposed subdivision to its northern boundary. Staff recommends acceptance of the dedication of the west half of the SW 66 Avenue as a 50 foot right -of -way complies with the policies of the current Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends approval of the proposed subdivision and variance request modified to extend the sidewalks along SW 66 Avenue as mentioned above. Jam „ a 3 Access Easement The access easement is designed as a cul -de -sac thirty feet wide ending in a bulb with radius 37.5 ft. The easement is designed down the center of the subdivision, across the front of each lot. All property lines meet in the center of the subdivision, but building setbacks will be measured from the edge of the easement. Each lot area exceeds the required 10,000 sq.ft. minimum net of the access easement. Variance Request South Miami's Zoning Ordinance does not contain unique area and frontage regulations for lots designed around cud -de -sacs. The current regulations are best applied to rectangular blocks arranged in grid formations. This organization is not desireable for this property because it would allow thru- traffic to use SW 66 as a short cut from Sunset Drive to SW 67 Ave. Minimum "frontage requirements are established to create regular and standarized lots throughout the community. When applied to lots around a cud -de -sac, South Miami's required frontage (75 feet, minimum) stretches the lots to unusual proportions.' When required setbacks are taken from unusually shaped lots!, the resulating buildable "envelope” may be too small for practical use. To avoid the hardship of unusually shaped lots, Applicants have proposed two lots of the subdivision with more regular lot shapes. and lot widths, measured at the edge of the access easement, of approximately forty feet. Dedication Applicants have agreed to dedicate the east 25 ft. of the parent tract as the west half of the existing SW 66 Ave. Because of the cul -de -sac design of the subdivision, no connection between the access easement and the SW 66 Ave. will be made and no increase in traffic will result. Sidewalks Section 17 -11 of the City "s Code of Ordinances requires that sidewalks be constructed if fifty percent of the existing residences on the same side of the street in the same block have sidewalks. Applicants propose no sidewalks along the cull -de -sac within the subdivision. Because this subdivision will create a new block, no sidewalks are required within the subdivision. Outside the subdivisio sidewalks exist to the south of the proposed development along both SW 66 and 67 Avenues. Applicants propose sidewalks along SW 67 Avenue. In order to satisfy the requirements of Section 17 -11, sidewalks must be provided on both SW 66 and 67 Avenues. Z O N I N G P E T I T I O N Property Descriptions W�/ fT � and Legal* , Leog� a Q Z� �C� �L U� �/� � '7 � pi / / /7 M114° S 4�16 X � c�v ma h followin r u st: Request: The Owners of tl5e above property have de the g eq e �'6P .�r-3 3. o/ To ALLOW 116 elmvo Rllfm�N flPavk 01v sw 66 lw'5 - Petition: We, the undersigned property owners, are within 300 feet of the above property. We understand and approve the above request. • . -37 1 DA f aici'.t..s -ii' 2 L J Qu i 4� 6 A tK.s - - - - - i Q1� u i" _ .�.3 wo kve - ae,vIge - - - - &yid �S.w• G j/c, to�j z� a 21 $ t _ Sw -?o Ga ft -e- - ub tL 88 &6 I It ScJ 70` LN, 6G to ro�--- - - - ^681_%SW - -- iay, g_g - - - - -- �reyw // 8r erOo Seal7�ra�"0L4.4c - - - -- lrs,pQoc �4 n4.e-.- - - - - - - LI Y 0 � r q F M - - 9 (continued on page 2) Page 1 ' w k • Z O N I N G P E T I T I O N (continued) Petition: We, the undersigned property owners, are within 300 feet of the above property. We understand and approve the above request. . 121 ' . - -y - - - - - - - - - !On .� _ G_ 7__s C - - - - -- - - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - -- - - -- --------------- - - - - -- - - -- --- - - - - -- - - -- -_ ------------ - - - - -- -------- - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -i >0 -37 Page 2 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING BOARD City Commission Chambers Tuesday, October 25, 1988 7:30 PM Presiding: Bruce Hoffmann, Acting Chairman Secretary: Shaleen Pinero A. The meeting was called to order by Acting Chairman Hoffmann at 7:35 PM and was followed by the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America. B. Roll call. Present (Constituting a quorum) Absent Manuel Gutierrez Thomas Cooper Neil Carver Bruce Hoffmann Susan Kraich Larry Ligammare John Andrews Also in attendance were Soheila Goudarzi, Planner, David Henderson, Planning Technician and Pamela Hoffman, Secretary. C. Public Hearing. PB -88 -017 Applicant: Stephen Roth, Betty McCrimmon, Bdward and Barbara Sax. Request #1 Approval of the subdivision of the subject property, waiving the regular platting procedure. Request #2 Variance from Zoning Ordinance Section 5 -3 -3.01 to allow two lots with less than 75 foot frontage. Location: 6851 S.W. 67 Avenue - 1 - Legal Description: The South 1/2 of the South 264 feet of the North 490.92 ft. of the West 1/2 of the West 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Sec- tion 25, Township 54 South, Range 40 East less the West 35 ft. thereof, lying and being in Dade County Florida. AND: The North 1/2 of the South 264 ft. of the North 490.92 ft. of West 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 25, Township 54 South, Range 40 East, less the Went" 35 ft. thereof, lying and being in Dade County, Florida. Mr. Roth, Applicant, signed in and addressed the Board. He said he is purchasing 1.8 acres of land in South Miami and he is closing the property on Nov. 4, 1988. He said the land is located between SW 67 -66 Ave. and 69 Street, it is zoned RS -3 which permits single family houses on 10,000 square foot lots. He said he is requesting approval of the waiver of plat and approval of variances in Zoning Ordinance Section 5 -3 -3.01 to allow two 'lots requesting 75 feet frontage. Mr. Roth and his consultants studied the property carefully and he is proposing a plan that he believes is the best plan. He said he submitted a waiver of plat for the property, subdivided into six individual family lots. He said each lot averages 11,981 gross sq. ft. and 10,087 net sq. ft. He plans to build 6 single family homes on the lots. The Proposed Plan is aesthetically attractive, environmen- tally sensitive and contains the largest possible lot size. The plan contains an attractive street by enclosing the cul -de -sac on all sides with houses. He said because the amount of street is minimized-only 10.82 of the property is in streets. Landscape areas and lot 'sizes are maximized. Mr. Roth presented to the Board his Proposed Plan. He said all six homes are arranged around a; property owned and maintained cul -de -sac, accessible from ',SW 67 Ave. A decorative wall will be built along; SW 67 and 66 Ave. To unify the subdivision by providing an attractive and identifiable image, while liaiting, the amount of street noise inside the subdivision and ah „so providing a sense of security for the residents.: 25 f oot strip will be dedicated to the City on the East of the property to complete the SW 66 Ave. right of way. -2_ Mr. Roth said that Alternate Plan B is similar to Plan A, except the cul -de -sac is not as long. It too meets all lot area and frontage requirements. The problems with Plan B, however, are similar to Plan A. Once the property line setback is constructed the resulting building envelopes will still results in a less attractive subdivision then the Proposed Plan. And again, three houses would be on each side of the street. Although the percentage of paved area in Plan B is less than Plan A, 12.3% compared to 14.6X, it is still higher than the Proposed Plan which is only 10.8%. The average net lot sizes are 10,512 sq. ft., still smaller than the Proposed Plan and the percentage of landscape area is still lower than the Proposed Plan. Another Alternate Plan would connect SW 67 Ave. to SW 66 Ave. He said he will not consider that plan. Although no variances would be required, it is not a good plan as it invites through traffic along SW 66 Avenue. In conclusion, Mr. Roth said it is evident that the Proposed Plan is 'better than the Alternative Plans. The Proposed Plan is the most visually attractive, environmentally sensitive and the plan liked by most Homeowners in the area. He said that should the Board deny this variance request, nevertheless he would proceed with one of the less desirable plans. He said he is asking for favorable consideration of the variance request and the waiver of plat to allow his to proceed with what he clearly believes is the best plan. Mr. Gutierrez asked Mr. Roth that he did not see a request in the Notice of Public Hearing to remove the sidewalk on 67 and 66 Ave. Mr. Roth, stated that although it is not on the reau.est he would like to remove the sidewalk. Mr. Gutierrez asked Mr. Roth if there was sidewalk on the North and :South of the property, Mr. Roth stated that there was a sidewalk South of his property. Mr. Gutierrez said if there was any reason why there shouldn't be a sidewalk. Mr. Roth said that none of the homeowners living next to the subdivision would benefit from this. Mr. Gutierrez asked Mr. Roth about the seven ficus trees on 67 Avenue and that in order for Mr. Roth to make his entrance, does he have to remove two of the trees. -4 - Mr. Roth said he thinks he only needs one removed. Mr. Gutierrez asked Mr. Roth if there'was anyway he could save the trees, like making a different entrance. Mr. Roth said he would review this with the Planning Board Staff. The Board discussed the construction of new sidewalks. It was established that a sidewalk exists to the South of the subdivision along SW 66 and SW 67 Ave. Mr. Roth stated that he would extend the sidewalk along SW 67 Avenue, but he did not feel that the neighborhood would be served by the installation of a sidewalk on 66 Avenue. Mr. Hoffmann stated he feels the hardship, in this, situation is caused by the way Mr. Roth designed the cul -de- sac. Mr. Roth said that in order to provide the largest lots and the safest street with very little pavement, two of the lots cannot meet the 75 foot frontage. Mr. Hoffman stated that this hardship is due to the engineering of the cul -de -sac that is why they need a variances. At this time the Public Hearing was opened. Mr. John Stimson', signed in and addressed the Board. He said he lives along the North boundary, and disagrees with the request not to build the sidewalk on 66 Ave. He stated that children play on the sidewalk and he wouldn't like to see them playing on the street. He also would like for the wall to be continued along the North side of the property to completely enclose the project. Mr. Robert. Healy, signed in and addressed the Board. He, said he lives across the street from Mr. Stimson. He would not like to have a side walk along SW 66 Avenue because the landscaping will preserve some of the country aspect. Mr. Ed Lassiter, signed in an addressed the Board. He he said lives right against the wall of the proposed subdivision and he agrees with the Proposed Plan. Mr. Hue Wallobee, signed in an addressed the Board. He said he lives South of the development on the East side of the street. He agrees with the Proposed Plan and would like to see it approved. Mr. Hoffmann at this point asked for staff recommendation. Mr. David Henderson stated that staff recommends the sidewalks be extended along both sides of the subdivision, to comply with the Section 17 -11 of the City's Code of Ordinance. Staff recommends the subdivision and the variance request be approved with a modification to extend the sidewalk along SW 66 Avenue. Mr. Ligammare stated that he needs more information, concerning the pavement and the building envelope that the cul -de -sac created. Mr. Roth once again explained the different plans. He stated that he needs more opening and less pavement to create a better and more attractive subdivision. Mr. Roth at this time presented the Board with a diagram to identify the comparison in the lot areas. Mr. Hoffmann stated he agreed with the Propose Plan, until Mr. Roth mentioned the results of the Alternative Plan would be three houses on each side of the subdivision that did not require variance. He stated that from his point of view there is a self- imposed hardship. Mr. Gutierrez stated that the reason there is a code and the reasons that there are variances and the reason the'Board is present tonight is to allow flexibility in the laws that contrl development. Whether a self - imposed hardship exists or not is not as important as approving the best plan. -6- y- 1 • Mr. Hoffmann said that the requirements of the code are very clear as to what the board has to find to grant a variance. A hardship is necessary in this circumstance and the Proposed Plan does not have a legal hardship. When the subdivision has two other alternatives that clearly are within the requirement of the code and do not require a variance. The fact that the preferable looking one requires a variance is a self- imposed hardship. This decision is not from an aesthetic point of view. Mr. Gutierrez stated that he would like to discuss the issue of hardship with the City Attorney. He feels that this hardship issue will go on forever and he needs the Board to be clear on it, so they can make a proper decision. MOTION: Mr. Gutierrez moved for approval on the request on the Proposed Plan by waiving the regular platting procedure and allowing the two East lots to have less than '75 ft. frontage. With the stipulation to follow staff approval to continue the sidewalk on both side of the subdivision on 67 and 66 Avenue. This is not a condition to meet for the but he would 'like for Mr. Roth to meet with the staff to try to maintain the tree. John Andrew seconded the motion. Mr. Carver stated that he does not see the need for a sidewalk to continue.on a dead end street which cannot be built through , since Davis Gardens has been platted and built the way it has which ends 66 Avenue in a dead end street. Ms. Kraich asked Mr. Roth who would own the sidewalk the Homeowners Association or the City. Mr. Roth stated that it would be owned by the City. Ms. Kraich said therefore, the City would have to maintain it. Ms. Kraich said she is not in favor because she knows how the City maintains the sidewalks. She said the City will neglect the sidewalk and at sometime become hazardous. Mr. Hoffman asked if there was any further discussion on the motion. VOTE: Approve: 1 Oppose: 5 The Motion Failed. - 7 - t r 10 • w � f r �. t J M 'Aw .Jin R �W oZ� + i L i S i L 11l • 7 law r Iffill g 1 %r1 .; tP jail IL- fit ♦� f 4111 all R FfC, k fair ,4 b� 1 T D NV z D LID Z C)© D Z m —D r D s ! 1 a I- � t r T1 Tt � n . o Y'TfM3OK v3'afoed � � �, TTIM9OA Hstbaw ' V A V N ! x 7� o b_ i IA D CDi \ 62.36' . - ----- -- --- _ N �' - -- --- ----------- v f j H.fE• JIii // I i R e ltl. 01' 131.R � { ', ow i0' 24 E 263.10" STPEET DEDICATION I 132.32' 131 6Y .. �G.f� nvF.ME.37 3O0•f0'29'E M or S.W. 66 AVE. ° g cn m I _p I y I 1 +yi 1 I r i I PI = w i0D•00'01'V 116.17' v 1 1100• Moo, 1 WW01'. M. 9I' 1 1 1001 U11LITT EM41" '• 75 FODI Uf ILITT EMEfT / tO pp j 000+ r 1 � G er s s •f 1 t �I' I m f Ln I msIs 7� o b_ i '. ?i +Fi� * ?Z -t' =FF� ;:t sts ;• }�t-} 3af't ^r-vs f ?ii eFi F ;i +iF r ?7 •t• z : rz t :rtsr: e f c { Fc:iir c s i s c -$ 9 t c t:t_ s'-•t•:; :: = ' 1� [i! a:-i:? of a at�_ ifF - >i : _ + }�' : ar__t: }x t i• €� ?�!} _.•• :E. ?� r a F:11t- ; . ; •: Eta :. E�. a.:t i� tt _ : t 1•::E z:- :.- °: :e sr':. -:.=r E� r $� .se = �i� i-� ;�, ft.ii�c� }3 =. E ; I Ei ?S:st ?ti +irFifir +f ;ii's1t if�F:e' r'•i5�F;r• •i= ; :i:r� � }fz- . } =.- }; ;i:,.EilF ::fi' f " n i t s r • + zi Q!! F (?i � � !�t : t kF:i:r_ •i ; �i- s r 1r _ f +?' ft � + f• , _,is ..a- °t ' z? ? s:.ssi.. s i. j _ .z ? + � } • i:. .•-::• �s t s :f tFs :. � r i_ a::•Iu _ fi! to tF - ;:t i iii;[ i° € f'-'•i. �° � _ }; :: tj � FizF-St F' ff �� i jj :f• i f -- "! :;t �z __Sgis qs ` !Y °iz + ? ?rsis +'3 : +-: j ii yyf'�•t sit }z v 91 £,r f: i =_ : "s 1 = ,F :[;:E 71 3 pf t[!': �t r:.t• i if 3 != 2'=s i 5 i.��eZ g� a +as ga? -� cis? Ij�f •p F_ i i t_ z i }'a• at i +c�tsi' + tazf� .F t •F E''•F f fr it i z r =.� f f + i ig l��� i! I E �:i i_ }? +t ai2c of •a 'rc P E ii_ :f vital F �i f s: t i ppp i :i+ : p tE : s Es z i F i�t# j i ?Fi =: �� 3 ; ;3� � .'•� if = i ' Ys .i s : F stt i sQ ti :i-_Q i; }�.3z nit e[fr �? :F?j r ��. }sf �c zs•Fi•! _ };: i" �= z, =''r�•:s } "=�ii r __ _z a; :a,6 a� 54 a� p "z } Ieis�t a z# izj S. p?c� 't,:F. F1 c-( i 6i si =ff} _ } F•! a Ss t 3�fi�•�s1.Tz ,•istf t: t_ is IA D CDi - _ N I e ltl. 01' 131.R � { ', ow i0' 24 E 263.10" STPEET DEDICATION I 132.32' 131 6Y .. �G.f� nvF.ME.37 3O0•f0'29'E M or S.W. 66 AVE. ° g '. ?i +Fi� * ?Z -t' =FF� ;:t sts ;• }�t-} 3af't ^r-vs f ?ii eFi F ;i +iF r ?7 •t• z : rz t :rtsr: e f c { Fc:iir c s i s c -$ 9 t c t:t_ s'-•t•:; :: = ' 1� [i! a:-i:? of a at�_ ifF - >i : _ + }�' : ar__t: }x t i• €� ?�!} _.•• :E. ?� r a F:11t- ; . ; •: Eta :. E�. a.:t i� tt _ : t 1•::E z:- :.- °: :e sr':. -:.=r E� r $� .se = �i� i-� ;�, ft.ii�c� }3 =. E ; I Ei ?S:st ?ti +irFifir +f ;ii's1t if�F:e' r'•i5�F;r• •i= ; :i:r� � }fz- . } =.- }; ;i:,.EilF ::fi' f " n i t s r • + zi Q!! F (?i � � !�t : t kF:i:r_ •i ; �i- s r 1r _ f +?' ft � + f• , _,is ..a- °t ' z? ? s:.ssi.. s i. j _ .z ? + � } • i:. .•-::• �s t s :f tFs :. � r i_ a::•Iu _ fi! to tF - ;:t i iii;[ i° € f'-'•i. �° � _ }; :: tj � FizF-St F' ff �� i jj :f• i f -- "! :;t �z __Sgis qs ` !Y °iz + ? ?rsis +'3 : +-: j ii yyf'�•t sit }z v 91 £,r f: i =_ : "s 1 = ,F :[;:E 71 3 pf t[!': �t r:.t• i if 3 != 2'=s i 5 i.��eZ g� a +as ga? -� cis? Ij�f •p F_ i i t_ z i }'a• at i +c�tsi' + tazf� .F t •F E''•F f fr it i z r =.� f f + i ig l��� i! I E �:i i_ }? +t ai2c of •a 'rc P E ii_ :f vital F �i f s: t i ppp i :i+ : p tE : s Es z i F i�t# j i ?Fi =: �� 3 ; ;3� � .'•� if = i ' Ys .i s : F stt i sQ ti :i-_Q i; }�.3z nit e[fr �? :F?j r ��. }sf �c zs•Fi•! _ };: i" �= z, =''r�•:s } "=�ii r __ _z a; :a,6 a� 54 a� p "z } Ieis�t a z# izj S. p?c� 't,:F. F1 c-( i 6i si =ff} _ } F•! a Ss t 3�fi�•�s1.Tz ,•istf t: t_ is `CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI PPLtCATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE PLANNING BOARD (FILE IN DUPLICATE) 415 APPLICATION MUST BE COMPLETED AND RETURNED, WITH ALL REQUIRED SUPPORTING DATA TO THE OFFICE OF THE >NfNG DIRECTOR BEFORE PROCEEDINGS MAY BE STARTED FOR PUBLIC HEARING. •PLICANT Ai (PJWNER TENANT AGENT ETC. SPECIFY) .Lo �/05 )DRESS or AP *S.1CAN � ��!"" CITY _ ��a ��/ STATE �3t3 PH b (�/j i ruf �JjD{�Sfi.. jF(,,J� �/J • Q 2 4NER t DATE OWNERSH6!• O PROPERTY OBTAINED G� 6 a DRESS O OWNER CITY STATE 111 ON C� /t,C. PROPS T OPTION Ora CONTRACT FOR OURCHASE7 MORTGAGC E I NAME AND ADDRESS YEi NO N v( APPLdGANT is NOT OWNER, IS LETTER OF AUTHORITY FROM OWNER ATTACHED?" YES NO GAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY COVERED BY APPLICATION ( ;) i BLOCK Pe rES ANO •OUNDS 7719 Mg l `e/ rhq JV v 2— 7o, fZ f&cv- o) 17e— Wesr ° D� 7o� Ne5r0a Ie V A/4F /WRllf 1-1�e Sw Np ,TIONAL DEDICATIONS PROPOSED ++•�V • ve•q� vVV� egV V=a Yn VT G.a • . 'LIGATION TO THE PLANNING BOARD FOR ACTION ON THE FOLLOWING: CHANGE OF ZONING ExCEPTiON OTHER (SPECIFY) VARIANCE AMEND SELTiON OF CODE [NT LONE CLASSIFFCATiON - CHANGE OF ZONING REQUESTED • 15-3 IVaI "ATION Od ABOVE T CPI , DLI.OWING SUPPORTING DATA REQUIRED IS SV$MITTEO WITH THIS APPLICATION. (ATTACHED HERETO AND MACE OF APPi61CATION. ) CERTIFIED SURVEY SITE PLAN PHOTOGRAPHS STATE►iENT OF REASONS OR CONOITIOHS JUSTIFYING CHANGE REQUESTED PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN HEARING FEE (CASH OR CH R +OERSIGNED HAS READ THIS COMPLETEO APPLICATION AND REPRE ENTS THE INFORMATION AN LL SUPPORTING 'URNiSHED is T A (O GORRE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWL _OG NO BELIEF. gnatu e, STSPHEN iiM SIGHATJRE , EDWA )FFIC£ USE ONLY OF HEARING HEARING NO, u Ray. s -11 -79 DATE FILED - s 'tITY OF $OUTH MIAMI u 'LIGATION FOR P LIC HEARING BEFORE PLANNING BOARD (FILE IN OUPLICATE) APPLICATION MUST BE COMPLETEO ANO RETURNED, WITH ALL REOVIREO SUPPORTING DATA TO THE OFFICE OF THE Na OIRECTOR BEFORE PROCEEDINGS MAY BE STARTEO FOR PUBLIC HEARING. PH2bp ` - - <'6 4% i t4AME AND ADDRESS ,PPLtCANT 15 NOT OWNER, IS LETTER OF AUTHORITY FROM OWNER ATTAC►IEOT YES HO SAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY COVERED BY APPLICATION (a) •LOCK �IVISJCN ES AND BOUNDS nip PS 6�T l' 7#9 It'00* �. �z %rte rb�'Di�Cr type GeuN' flOTHS OF ABUTTING RiW /S TIONAL DEDICATIONS PROPOSED LICATION TO THE PLANNING BOARD FOR ACTION ON THE FOLLOWING: CHANGE OF ZONING EXCEPTION OTHER (SPECIFY) VARIANCE AMEND SECTION OF CODE` MT ZONC CLASSIFICATION CHANGE OF ZONING REQUESTED .NATION Of AiovE - T� D Le,Sf Tilt 7S- r LLOWING SUPPORTING DATA REQUIRED IS SUBMITTED WITH THIS APPLICATION. (ATTACHED HERETO AND MA09 F APPLIGJ►TION. ) ' CERTIFIED fURVCY SITE PLAN PHOTOGRAPHS STATEMENT OF REASONS OR CONDITIONS JUSTIFYING CHANGE RCQUESTEO PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN HEARING FEE (CASH OR CHECK) OTHER ,CRSIGNEO HAS READ THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION AND IIEPRESENTS THE INFORMATION ANO ALL SUPPORTING ANISHEO IB TR Np ORRECT HE i F H!i KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. 38Lure, $`i>;P ROTH S ATuR i 'FICE USE ONLY )F HEARING HEARING NO. I REv, J -11-71 DATE FILED RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION APPOINTING WILLIAM HAMPTON AS CITY MANAGER OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI. WHEREAS, William Hampton has served with distinction as the City's interim City Manager; and WHEREAS, in recognition of his performance and the need to retain the professionalism Mr. Hampton has brought to the position, the City Commission desires to appoint William Hampton City Manager. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That William Hampton is hereby appointed City Manager of the City of South Miami, to serve at the pleasure of the commission and in accord with all provisions of the Charter and Code of Ordinances of the City of South Miami PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1988. APPROVED: MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY sm.citmanager.res I RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ADVERTISE REQUESTS FOR PROPOSALS FOR A CONSULTANT TO DRAFT LAND USE ZONING REGULATIONS IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND PLAN AMENDMENTS. WHEREAS, the City of South Miami has transmitted Plan Amendments and a revised Comprehensive Plan to the State, Department of Community Affairs; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, the City is required to implement land use zoning regulations in accord with any Adopted Plan or Amendment. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to advertise requests for proposals for a consultant to draft land use zoning regulations in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Plan Amendments. PASSED THIS DAY OF , 1988. MAYOR Attest: CITY CLERK Approved as to form: CITY ATTORNEY sm.citmana4.res ORDINANCE N0. AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA AMENDING SECTION 6 -2 -2 OF ARTICLE VI OF CHAPTER 20 OF THE CITY'S ZONING CODE BY REQUIRING THAT ALL EXTENSIONS OF TEMPORARY PERMITS BE APPROVED BY FOUR (4) AFFIRMATIVE VOTES OF THE CITY COMMISSION. WHEREAS, the City's zoning code has provisions regarding the issuance of permits for temporary signs and displays; and WHEREAS, the City Commission wishes to have authority over any extensions of such permits issued by the City Manager. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That Section 6 -2 -2 of Article VI of Chapter 20 of the Zoning -Code is hereby amended as follows: Temporary Permits The City Manager, upon application, may issue temporary permits for the following signs and displays for a period not to exceed thirty (30) days when, in his opinion, the use of such signs and displays would be in the public interest and would, not result in damage to private property. The City Manager shall have the authority to revoke or suspend such permit', in the event all conditions of the approval are not :complied with ' y b the applicant. Extensions beyond the'ori final thirty 30 day approval shall only be granted by four affirmative votes of the City Commission. Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1988. APPROVED: MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY sm temppermit.ord H r R 'r ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI`, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 5 -14 -2 OF CHAPTER 20 OF THE CODE OF ZONING ORDINANCES AND AMENDING CHAPTER 139 ARTICLE VIII, SECTION 177000 OF THE CITY'S OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE CODE BY DELETING PAWNSHOPS AS A- SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED USE IN THE CITY`. WHEREAS, the City of South Miami currently permits Pawnshops as a permitted.use in the C -3 district of the City; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 13, Article VIII, Section 177000 of the Code of Ordinances ,provides for a fee schedule for this occupation; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission deem it in the public interest that this use be deleted from the City's zoning and occupational license codes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That Section 5 -14 -2 of Chapter 20 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of South Miami is hereby amended by deleting the following use in the C -3 district: gawasl��e Section 2. That .Section 177000 of Chapter 13, Article VIII of the Code of Ordinances is hereby deleted: -4- 4. r" Section 3. Any business which holds an occupational license pursuant to the above described sections, shall be deemed a permitted non- conforming use and shall be allowed to operate this occupation at the license fee in effect immediately prior to the effective date of this ordinance and as the said fee may be lawfully amended. ll• •r Section 4. That this ordinance take effect immediately upon its passage. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 198 APPROVED: MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY PASSED ON 1st READING: PASSED ON 2nd READING: Deletions shown by underlining. i ► - t RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, ,FLORIDA, DENYING AN ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL FROM A DECISION OF THE ADMINISTRATION REGARDING A BUILDING PERMIT FINE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6841 S.W. 78th TERRACE. WHEREAS, the City Administration has imposed a $100.00 fine and a $ 140.00 Quadruple Fee pursuant to City Ordinance regarding a building permit at 6841 S.W. 78th Terrace.; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 13 -1 of the Zoning Code, the Applicant wishes to appeal this decision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That the appeal of the Applicant from a decision of the City Administration is hereby denied. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1988. APPROVED: ATTEST: MAYOR CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY sm bldper13.res October 27, 1988 Serviiio Herrera, request to be on the regular City Commission agenda on November 15, 1988, to appeal the quadruple fee of $140.00, and the $100.00 fine assessed to me for starting the work prior to securing the proper permit on the job located at 6841 S.W. 78 Terrace. The Commission meeting will be held at 7:30 P.M., 6130 Sunset Drive, Commission Chambers. Servilio Herrera Date d o17 W tness Date CC: Building Dept. City Clerk 1 CITY OF SOUE L) TH MIANN szlDa -1 KORIAITJ BUILDING AND ZONING Key* • -11 -M \ /E / , L, B ) )LIO NUMDE•:c TYPE OR PRINT APPLICANT FILL INSIDE UILOING PERMIT APPLICATION HEAVY LINES -TEL NO.. r :L ADDRESS ^ rEl •D,_ •,L AoD4cs9 — — ­ 7 C T LESCRIPT:ON OF JOB: Lot NO,1 601VIS.Ur SEC.— _. -IWO RGE O[+ TES l SCUNDS_ P.6 6 PAGE NO.�' � CITY PERMIT FEES - l " *Feeimposed by State Legislature for the Development of Radon Resistant Building Codes �' S TOTAL FEES OW4La -Du It. OEPI OUALIFIEO Y —N—CHECKED Sy- "to CARD LIEV. SPRY. DR11NA69 PLAN win. FL. [l[Y.. NEO.O -Y -N- R t0.O -Y-N- CHECKED IMDJ.I -'F_M, -AHOY[ W -9 -L -- 1LLOR NUM9ta CONCRETI CARD _ V' N _ TtfTS REQUIRED (r4 ILE .DRIP. S:, ►[R, �7 ,_ N_; UPC*— V-N -OTN[R .wv�► ArO r•►[ CONTRACTOR -_ OIr. SJh - C3NST. 6UAL. TO SUILO_Y -11- FN£rkf. UNITS $NO► 0W65. SEAL ♦►PN Or[D__Y_H�_RL DUIRFO Y_N,R[00..- .Y —�-- .OT % SOUARE CJVER FEET THIS PERMIT INCLUDES; E1TIYATEO VALUE_ PER rw1MC. 9 rG S 3!_11----• ` 1 L . _� - 5y , V'111' / �, .fte,(T ._CRESS cr Joe s'.i�I� _ .ccFSSOR. A•r ENCL. -~•' �! SIZI _ SURVEY ATTACHED? —___ LOT ST4x EDT- P '`+F -FSEN• L'SE IVACA4' OR NO Or 9VILDINCS AND USE EACH OO JLEO) SOAXAGE 017C •.(•IS'.: AAt APPLR;ATD1F04 P(AA+rt TOIRtCT GI ALIEN 09HOLfrD G ►A;A KEMOV11 A(A+00t. C) •STDAT R[59,[kT IAL 0 COMMOI AL 910.6AI u[ I1 refs F 1P THE FOLLLOWING SPECIFIC USE AND OCCUPA` m,-Y li�c (���i�' f /�Aw/ //►� 240 / : ► �1 107 AL AM OUNI 0UE1Q�j- IIl CUBE —, TUNE REQUIRED "A'I.•'� L T "i.L ejL - - OFFICIAL HWY. *IDTH +1d,+,Onol . +O •.A sho..n Oa tM 04fts Rn4d covered !y this patmil: C l�T n a. L _rSNCI- n P.111001 5C*. tkCL.a POOL 13 SOARA6I Pn L PA + «T DEDICATED WIDTH .G Or NO Or r0. Or HOTEL LOT DIMENS. LOT AREA •r1YR Li -SITS R(DRvOrf. STORI UNITS PERMIT NO D(10 REST'R 5 RtSOIUT 10195 CNICStO —y —N • i �.� _�_ PF R r f 7 NO. • 'N01.3'ARO 'NAT SEPARATE ►LRAA1Ts MUST 91 OiTAI.NEO FOR THE FOLLOWING ITIIAS, PROOF OF. _ O v NLt S1 Sr(;IFICALLT CO.tR(O 9• THIS PCA*A:r: tLtCT01 CAL , PLVow Ni, SIP, IC 7AN[, OV.4ERSH1►_ CHECKED OY A- •ELL. �t A,ER, AIR CONDITIONSNt, tOARAGE PITS. *OILIRS. 51646, tLt VAIORs. r(RCE, e SC RL[N CrCLOSuRts, WALL. PA,106 AND POOL; AND THA7 119 216101004 THIS AP►LICAT100• P • AA+ sI sPow S'h1 FOP INS WIRVISION AND COMPIfTIOk OF TH1 CONsItUCTION 114 VI LATIONS AC-EOto.NCt WITH TNt •LAMS .RO s ►t CIF1CAT 10145 AND ►OR COY PLIANCIL wllT ALL rto- CHECK :. CHECKED BY DATE ERAL ftl i s pc CERT. . jrotr•t of CONtFOCEOF r +1t�t1) ar) rr UAtr.RYirder Only) Nmbeft CLASS CNECKED SY u •.ESS IC.tRll DATE ACCEPTtO: ISSUED BY: DATE: Q t O N i.t (��'�/ ')Y0171• UNOEII WHICH APPROVED //..y� f/�� '�.�yyS Cii / It)0 . CC C u 2 FAILURE row / r /' v� • by WITH THE APPROYED DAT OISAPPADV :O/AIN(F MECHANICS LIEN LAW CAN RESULT �.TR i Q IN THE PROPERTY OWNER PAYING vL UM8 1NG k1!,NG f- LECTpICAL . TWICE FOR BUILDING IMPROVEMENT RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, DENYING AN ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL FROM A DECISION OF THE ADMINISTRATION REGARDING A BUILDING PERMIT FINE FOR PROPERTY, LOCATED AT 5336 S.W. 57TH AVENUE. WHEREAS, the City Administration has imposed a $500.00 fine pursuant to Ordinance 25 -83 -1185 regarding a building permit at 5336 S.W. 57th Ave.; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 13 -1 of the Zoning Code, the Applicant wishes to appeal this decision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That the appeal of the Applicant from a decision of the City Administration is hereby denied. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of ,1988. APPROVED: ATTEST:. MAYOR CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY sm bldperlO.res )!�)e- r- -r� k S 1 'November 4, 1988 Princess Roofing, request to be on the regular City Commission agenda on November 15, 1988, to appeal the $500.00 fine assessed to-ma for starting the work prior to securing the proper permit on the job located at 5336 S.W. 57 Ave. The Commission meeting will be held at 7:30 P.M., 6130 Sunset Drive, Commssion Chambers. L Prin ess Roof ing Sec e Q Date Al /PIT Witness Date A RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH 'MIAMI, FLORIDA, DENYING AN ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL FROM A DECISION OF THE ADMINISTRATION REGARDING A BUILDING PERMIT FINE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5975 S.W. 72ND STREET. WHEREAS, the City Administration has imposed a $500.00 fine and a $ 281.80 Quadruple Fee pursuant to Ordinance 25 -83 -1185 regarding a building permit at 5975 S.W. 72nd Street.; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 13 -1 of the Zoning Code, the Applicant wishes to appeal this decision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That the appeal of the Applicant from a decision of the City Administration is hereby denied. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 91988. APPROVED: ATTEST: MAYOR CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY sm bldperlO.res P e, , , ks r x V� November 8, 1988 Mario Rojas, request to be on the regular City Commission agenda on November 15, 1988, to appeal the $500.00 fine and $281.80 quadruple fee assessed to C S L. Electric, Inc. for starting the work prior to securing the proper permit on the job located at 5975 S.W. Sunset Drive, Suite 804A. The Commission meeting will be held at 7:30 P.M., 6130 Sunset Drive, Commission Chambers. Mar o Rojas Date Wress Date cc: Bldg. Dept. City Clerk !� (,�k --s RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, DENYING AN ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL FROM A DECISION OF THE ADMINISTRATION REGARDING A BUILDING PERMIT FINE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5975 S.W. 72ND STREET. WHEREAS, the City Administration has imposed a $500.00 fine and a $ 260.00 Quadruple Fee pursuant to Ordinance 25 -83 -1185 regarding a building permit at 5975 S.W. 72nd Street.; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 13-1 of the Zoning Code, the Applicant wishes to appeal this decision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That the appeal of the Applicant from _a decision of the City Administration is hereby denied, PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 91988. APPROVED: ATTEST: MAYOR CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY sm bldperl0.res --- -- ------ ro November 8, 1988 Mario Rojas, request to be on the regular City Commission agenda on November 15, 1988, to appeal the $500-00 fine and $260.00 quadruple fee assessed to Sanoli plumbing for starting the work prior to securing the proper permit on the job located at 5975 S.W. Sunset Drive, Suite 804A. The Commission meeting will be held at 7:30 P.M., 6130 Sunset Drive, Commission Chambers. .0e Mario Rojas Date fitness Date cc: Bldg. Dept. City Clerk A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, DENYING AN ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL FROM A DECISION OF THE ADMINISTRATION REGARDING A BUILDING PERMIT FINE FAR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5975 S.W. 72ND STREET. WHEREAS, the City Administration has imposed a $500.00 fine and a $ 108.00 Quadruple Fee pursuant to Ordinance 25 -83 -1185 regarding a building permit at 5975 S.W. 72nd Street.; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 13-1 of the Zoning Code, the Applicant wishes to appeal this decision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That the appeal of the Applicant from a decision of the _City Administration is hereby denied. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 11988. APPROVED: ATTEST: MAYOR CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY sm bldperl0.res November 8, 1988 Mario Rojas, request to be on the regular City Commission agenda on November 15, 1988, to appeal the $500.00 fine and $108.00 quadruple fee assessed to Solo Air Conditioning, for starting the work prior to securing the proper permit on the job located at 5975 S.W. sunset Drive, suite 604A. The Commission meeting will be held at 7 :30 P.M., 6130 Sunset Drive, Commission Chambers. Ma io Rojas Date Witness Date cc: Bldg. Dept. City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, DENYING AN ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL FROM A DECISION OF THE ADMINISTRATION REGARDING A BUILDING PERMIT FINE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5975 S.W. 72ND STREET. WHEREAS, the City Administration has imposed a $500.00 fine and a $ 284.20 Quadruple Fee pursuant to Ordinance 25 -83 -1185 regarding a building permit at 5975 S.W. 72nd Street.; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 13 -1 of the Zoning Code, the Applicant Wishes to appeal this decision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That the appeal of the Applicant from a decision of the City Administration is hereby denied. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of ,1988. APPROVED; ATTEST: MAYOR CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY sm bldperl0.res 4 v November 8, 1988 Mario Rojas, request to be on the regular City Commission agenda on November 15, 1988, to appeal the $500.00 fine & $284.20 the quadruple fee assessed to Steward Construction, Inc. for starting the work prior to securing the proper permit on the job located at 5975 S.W. Sunset Drive, Suite 804A. The Commission meeting will be held at 7:30 P.M., 6130 Sunset Drive, Commission Chambers. M io Rojas Date Witness Date cc: Bldg. Dept. City Clerk F,.r k5