Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
06-14-88
OFFICIAL AGENDA CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 6130 Sunset Drive REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING JUNE-14, 1988 7 : 30 fP .,M . Next Resolution 106 -88 -9021 Next Ordinance: 9 -88 -1304 Next Commission Meeting: 7/21/88 A. Invocation B. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America C. Items for Commission Consideration: 1. Approval of minutes: March 22, 1988 April 5, 1988 2. City Manager's Report 3. City Attorney's Report ORDINANCES - SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING: none RESOLUTIONS FOR PUBLIC HEARING: 4. A Resolution authorizing the City Administration to leave Manor Lane Bridge 3/5 (over Brewer Canal at S.W. 64th Court) open for vehicular and pedestrian traffic. (Commissioner McCann) 5. A Resolution granting variances to allow three (3) directional signs of 2 sq. ft., 4/5 A. 22.75 sq. ft. and 39 sq. ft., respectivelly in a commercial office district where two directional signs of 2 sq. ft. are each allowed on property legally described as Lots 17 & 18, less the East 35' and less the North 25' M/L of Lot 17 for right- of-way, and the East 30' of S.W. 62nd Court lying West and adjacent closed per Resolution No. 45 -82 -5025 and Lots 19 through 21 and the North 36' of Lot 22 less the East 35' thereof for right -of -way and the East 30' of S.W. 62nd Court lying West and adjacent closed per Resolution No. 45 -83 -5025 and the South 24' of Lot 22 and the North 55' of Lot 23, less the fast 35' for right -of -way and the East 30' of S.W. 62nd Court lying West and adjacent of W.A. HOBBS SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 111, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida:. A /K /A 6200 Sunset Drive. (Planning Board /Administration) 5. A Resolution granting a variance to allow a detached sign in a commercial office 4/5 B. district where it is not permitted on property legally described as Lots 17 & 18 less the East 35' and less the North 25' M/L of Lot 17 for right -of -way and the East 30' of S.W. 62nd Court lying West and adjacent closed per Resolution No. 45 -82 -5025 and Lots 19 through 21 and the North 36' of Lot 22 less the East 35' thereof for right -of -way and the East 30' of S.W. 62nd Court lying West and adjacent closed per Resolution No. 45 -83 -5025 and the South 24' of Lot 22 and the and the North 55' of Lot 23 less the East 35' for right -of -way and the East 30' of S.W. 62nd Court lying West and adjacent of W.A. HOBBS SUBDIVISION as recorded at Plat Book 4, Page Ill of-the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, A /K /A 6200 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida. (Planning Board /Administration) . RFSOLUTIONS: 6. A Resolution appointing Alfred Taylor as Acting City Manager. 3/5 (Mayor and Commission) 7. A Resolution authorizing the Acting City Manager to enter into an agreement with 4/5 Florida International University to sponsor a design competition for South Miami City Hall site beautification. (Commissioner McCann) 8. A Resolution authorizing the Acting City Manager to convert a cab and chassis into 4/5 a trash truck. (Administration) 9. A Resolution authorizing the Actting City Manager to purchase uniforms for the 3/5 Public Works Department. (Administration) REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 14TH, 1988 PAGE 2 RESOLUTIONS (continued): 10. A Resolution authorizing the Acting City Manager to advertise for the position 3/5 of electrical inspector for the Department of Building, Zoning & Community Development. -- (Commissioner McCann) 11. A Resolution authorizing the Acting City Manager to execute an agreement with 3/5 Rachlin & Cohen for independent auditing services for fiscal years ending September 1988 -1990. (Administration) 12. A Resolution ratifying the payment for temporary day laborers for the Public 4/5 Works Department. (Administration) ORDINANCES -FIRST READING: 13. An Ordinance denying a rezoning request from Neighborhood Commercial District 3/5 (C -1) to Arterial Commercial District (C -3) on property legally described as Lots 10, 11, and 12, Block 8, TOWNSITE OF LARKINS,.SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 105 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, A /K /A 6731 S.W. 58th Place, South Miami, Florida. (Planning Board /Administration) 14. An Ordinance granting a request to rezone property from High Density Residential 4/5 (RM -24) to Residential Office (RO) on property legally described as the West 54' of the North 14.88' of the East 137' of the North 150' of the West 112 of the S.E. 1/4 of the S.W. 1/4 of the S.W. 1/4 Section 25, Township 54 South, Range 40 East in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, A /K /A 6230 S.W. 70th,Street, South Miami, Florida. (Planning Board /Administration) REMARKS: none DEFERRED AND/OR TABLED: none YOU ARE HEREBY' ~ ADVISED THAT IF ANY PERSON DESIRES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING OR HEARING, SUCH PERSON WILL NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS BASED. d T RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY ADMINISTRATION TO LEAVE MANOR LANE BRIDGE (OVER BREWER CANAL AT S.W. 64TH COURT) OPEN FOR VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC. WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of South Miami authorized the City's Planning Board to do a study and hold a public hearing relative to the feasibility of closing Manor Lane Bridge where it crosses Brewer Canal at Manor Lane at the end of S.W. 64th Court; and WHEREAS, on May 10th, 1988, the Planning Board held said public hearing and an informal vote of those present `in the audience reflected they would be opposed to a study relative to the feasibility of closing Manor Lane Bridge; and WHEREAS, the City of South Miami Planning Board voted 5/0 for denial of a resolution to study the feasibility of closing Manor Lane Bridge. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE. MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH.MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That the City Commission does hereby authorize the Administration to leave Manor Lane Bridge (over Brewer Canal at S.W. 64th Court) open for vehicular and pedestrian traffic. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 1988. APPROVED: ATTEST: MAYOR CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: Minutes- Planning Board -9- May 10, 1988 5. PB -88 -008. A Resolution of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida authorizing the Planning Board to study the feasibility of closing Manor Lane Bridge where it crosses Brewer Canal at Manor Lane at the end of SW 64th Court. Vice Chairman Hoffmann opened the Public Hearing. A petition of signature of residents of South Miami who are opposed to the closing of the Manor Lane bridge was presented to the Board. (Exhibit BY Margery Radomaki, 6501 Manor Lane, signed in and addressed the Board. She said that she is tired of the traffic and the speeders on Manor Lane. She said the 20 m.p.h. speed limit should be raised a small amount. She said that she is in favor of studying the closing'of the. bridge. Chris Hansen, 6611 SW 78 Terrace, signed in and addressed the Board. Mr. Hansen said that there is a problem with people speeding in the Manor Lane neighborhood. Mr. Hansen is not against a feasibility study, but he is opposed to the closing of the bridge and the isolation of the neighborhood. Chris Phelan, 6480 Manor Lane, signed in and addressed the Board. He said that thanks to the South Miami Police Department there has been some improvement in the speeding problem. Mr. Phelan said that he is in favor of closing the bridge and opposed to the City conducting any further studies, as they are a waste of City money. David Tucker, Sr., 6556 SW 78 Terrace, signed in and addressed the Board. Mr. Tucker said that when the bridge was closed six years ago, it caused a great deal of inconvenience for the residents of the area. He is opposed to closing the bridge and to any further studies. He suggests that the City enforce the speed limit on Manor Lane. Marilyn Ogliby, 7740 SW 65 Place, said that she is in favor of the study to close the bridge. Ms. Ogliby suggested the City put in traffic bumps to slow down the traffic. Carl H. Snyder, 6890 SW 78 Terrace, said that he did not care whether or not there is a study to close the bridge. He said that if the City should study the closing of the bridge that the City should consider the inconvenience Kinutes- Planning Board -10 May 10,"1988 caused to the residents of this area in emergency situations. Jack Jones, 7430 SW 63 Avenue, said that a traffic study is needed for this area. He suggested that if the bridge is closed that the City should reopen 63rd and 64th Court. Mr. Jones said that he is in favor of the study. Lynn Herbert, 7861 SW 67 Court, signed in and addressed the Board. She is opposed to the closing of the bridge as the bridge is needed for emergency vehicles. Ms. Herbert is opposed to the study. David Lanier, 6311 SW 74 Street, signed in and addressed the Board. He said the problems in the area will not be solved by closing the bridge and will create more problems. Mr. Lanier said that it will be three times longer for the fire or police to reach the area in an emergency. He is opposed to the study, as it is not necessary. George Pike, 7601 SW 63 Court,, signed in and addressed the Board. He is opposed to the study. Mr. Pike said this is one issue that the community will not allow to happen and that is the closing of the bridge. Richard Prentiss, 7571 SW 65 Place, signed in and addressed the Board. Mr. Prentiss said that he is opposed to the study, as it is a waste of money. He said that the City has .just spent a lot of money on the Comprehensive Plan. -He said part of the Plan that is designed to help reduce the flow of traffic in this area, and that is the closing of 63 Avenue at 74 Street; thereby forcing people to make several turns to go through this neighborhood. He is concerned that the City is proposing to study something that will make two neighborhoods out of one neighborhood. He is also concerned that this will limit the accessibility of the area for the police and fire departments. He said there are too many studies. Lisa Tucker Telieu, addressed the Board. business coming into the heads of residen that she is opposed closing the bridge. 6556 SW 78 Terrace, signed in and She said that she is tired of big the City and planting big ideas in is and the Commissioners. She said to the study of the feasibility of George Ogliby, 7740 SW 65 Place, said that he is concerned with the traffic problem in the Manor Lane area. He said that he is opposed to wasting money on something that has already been studied. y Minutes-Planning Board -11- May 10, 1988 Vice Chairman Hoffmann asked if there was anyone else present who wished to speak on this issue. Since there were none, the Public Hearing was closed. Vice Chairman Hoffmann asked for a show of hands from the audience of persons either in favor or opposition to the study of the feasibility of the closing of the Manor Lane bridge. The result of the show of hands was: Favor - 4 Oppose - 25 Mr. Carver said that it is his opinion that most of the audience is against the study, but feel that something should be done about some form of traffic control other than the closing of the bridge. MOTION: Neil Carver moved to amend the item in question to consider the feasibility of controlling the traffic on Manor Lane without closing the bridge. The Motion died for lack of a second. MOTION: Thomas Cooper moved for denial of the resolution. Larry Ligammare seconded the Motion. Vote: Favor of Denial: 5 Oppose: 0 E. Approval of Minutes of January 12, 1988 and LPA Minutes March 7, 1988. Since some of the Board members did not have their Minutes the Board unanimously voted to defer approval of the Minutes until the next meeting. F. Remarks. Mr. Ligammare requested that there be coffee at the meetings. Mr. Carver said that the residents of the Manor Lane area wanted something to be done about traffic control. Mr. Cooper said that the residents all recognize there is a traffic problem, emotions are so high, that they are not going to do anything to solve the problem. He also said that the exact same people were at the previous Commission meeting. Mr. Ligammare said that all members should try to be present at the next meeting and also asked that the secretary try and jMinutes-Planning Board -12- May 10, 1988 1 encourage tonight's absent members to attend, because of the elections. G. Adjournment. There being no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 10:20 PM. Secretary Vice Chairman - II I 0 11 01) of ith Mlar l PLANNI BOARD NOTICE Of PUBLIC HEARING On Tuesday, May 10, 1988 at 7:30 P.M. in the City Commission Chambers, the Planning BEard of the City of South Miami will conduct Public Hearings on the following mattersl PB -88 -004 Applicant: Robert Striekland Request. A change in sorting fros Medium Multi Family Residential District (EM -24) to Residential Office DVatrict (10). Location: 6230 SW 70 Street Legal Description: The W 54' of the N 14.88' of the E 137' of the North 150' of the W 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the Sit 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 25, Township 54 S, Range 40 E, Dade County, Florida PB- 88-005 Applicant: Donald A. Mitchell Request: A change in zoning from Neighborhood Commercial District (C -1) to Arterial Commercial District (C -3). Location: 6731 SW 58 Place Legal Description: Lots 10, 11 4 12. Ilk. 8, Townsite of Larkins Subdivision, Plat Book 2/105, Dade County, Florida PS -88 -007 Applicant: Orestes Pinol Request: Variance to allow a 6'0" side setback where 7'6" is normally required. Location: 6346 SW 42 Street Legal Description: Lot 7 less W 37' and W 33'.of lot 6, Black 6 Bird Road Estates Subdivision, Fist Book 19/76, Dade County, Florida PB -88 -006 An Ordinance of the Major and City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida, amending Chapter 20, Article 5, Section 5- 12-2 of the Zoning Code by eliminating "food stores (convenience type only)" froe the schedule of permitted uses In "C-1" Neighborhood Commercial bistrict. PS- 88-008. A Resolution of the Maydr and the City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida, a4thoriaing the Planning Board to study the feasibility of closing Manor Lane Bridge where it crosses Braver Canal at Manor Lane at fhe end of SW 64th Court. YOU ARC HEREBY ADVISED THAT IF ANY PERSON DESIRte TO A CAL AMY OiCISION MADE WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERIED AT THIS MEETING OR AARINGe SUCH PERSON WILL NEEO A RECORD OF THC PROCCEDINQS, AND FOR SUCH PURPOSE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD Of THC PRO- CEEDINGS IS MADE$ WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TkSTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPCAL is TO SC BASCO. (F. s. 2,6. 0105) LIC NEARING WILL BE MCLO IN THC COMMISSION CHAMBERS AT THE CITY HALLS 6130 SUNSET DRIVE$ SOUTH .His FLonicA, AT THE TIME AND DATE STATED ABOVt. INTERESTED PARTIES ARC URGED TO ATTEND. OBJECTIONS OR EXPRESSIONS OF APPROVAL MAY BE MAOC `[RSON AT THE HEARING OR FILED IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE HEARING. THE BOARD RESERVES THC 14T TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COMMISSION WHATEVER THE BOARD CONSIDERS IN THE BEST INTEREST FOR ARCH INVOLVED. THE BOARD 'S RECOMMENDATION OJ4 THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE CITY COMMISSION 'A FUTURE DATE. INTERESTED PARTIES REQUESTING NFORMATION ARE ASKED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF, THE ING OIRCCTOR BY CALLING 647 -s"1 OR BY WRITING• tFER TO 'HEARING NUMBER WHEN MAKING AJIRY. PLANNING BOARD :100 -7 m: Rev. 11 -s -61 THIS IS A COURTESY NOTICE s g NOTICE -Of PUBLIC HEARING B a ON TUESDAY, MAY 10TH, 1988, 7 :30 p1j�, THE PLANNING BOARD WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AT SOUTH MIAMI CITY HALL COMMISSION CHAMBERS, 6130 SUNSET DRIVE, ON THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION. ALL INTERESTED PARTIES ARE INVITED TO ATTEND THIS MEETING. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE PLANNING BOARD TO STUDY THE FEASIBILITY OF CLOSING MANOR LANE BRIDGE WHERE IT CROSSES BREWER CANAL'AT MANOR LANE AT THE END OF S.W. 64TH COURT. - WHEREAS, in order to preserve the residential character of the Manor Lane area of the City; and WHEREAS, in order to promote the public health, safety and welfare of the residents of the area by eliminating excess traffic congestion, the feasibility of closing Manor Lane Bridge should be considered by the City's Planning Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: SECTION 1. That the Mayor and City Commission hereby authorize the Planning Board to make recommendations regarding permanently closing Manor Lane Bridge at the end of S.W. 64th Court. SECTION 2. That there shall be a notice of public hearing and public hearing advertisement and each resident between the areas of Sunset Drive, S.W. 80th Street, Manor Lane and S.W. 67th Avenue shall be notified individually. YOU ARE HEREBY ADVISED THAT IF ANY PERSON DESIRES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE WITH: RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING OR HEARING, SUCH PERSON WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, AND FOR SUCH PURPOSEMAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDIN IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. (F.S. 286.0105). THE C11" OF sout4 4../ff;"M; 6130 SUNSET DRIVE, SOUTM MIAMI, FLORIDA 3310 PUBLIC SERVICE DEPARTMENT Z O N I N G P E T I T I O N Property Description, Location and Legal: Request: The Owners of the above property have made the following request: Petition: We , the undersigned property owners, ske p we undorcranrL �n� Bp�rAVe the agave— request-. NAME DATE ADDRESS C ,O S C-0 e- --- — — — — — — — ;. .c� f . 7� .•_3a�8 __�pZl- - - - - -- - - - - -- 3 �c3 O1,� joS� PI AC P - - - - - - 3f3° �p5'22 S6w� 7 &= e�_� -- We? el�.]- 4�t'Jr4-0' 6 .s-- 141 5- -/ _75od -Sw_ V-- C ., -/_ - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a------ 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JSO -37 (continued on page 2) Page 1 THE Clf� Of out!-tami $130 SUNSET DRIVE, SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 33143 PUBLIC SERVICE OEPARTMEW Z O N I N G P E T I T I O N Property Description, Location and Legal: Request The Owners of the above property have made the following request: A4 D /Le 5, /J -rtT-s Petition: We, the undersigned property owners, r n 1)0 14K W ". -r 6 P-A ON fiI A4at2 LA-tJC O-tl CA, DATE ADDRESS -Klr7 I-A -5k -6 - -' - ----- - - - - - y %fr 7631- Sw -67 -4�-! - - -- Dy� 7�V 14/ IL l -V 7Y2 - h ---___ yy___-_���D__ _ Sao HAM (�w - -- -- - - - - -- -- r -- ------------------- - I- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L - - - -I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IWSO -37 (continued on page 2) Page 1 } � THE CfT OF ,out 4..Niami 6130 SUNSET DRIVE, SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 33143 PUBLIC SERVICE DEPARTMENT Z O N I N G P E T I T I O N Property Description, Location and Legal: Request: The Owners of the above property have made the following request: Petition: We, the undersigned property owners, 4W% P �P t We-u d a 7r,rovP tho_ above- request .* �)6 NOT W " i ��i��� -� 6N 61A-N6 t4._ l.AA/ c�u�YL 13��.��ci2- N A L NAmF, CA DATE ADDRESS `- - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - -- - ` - - - - �( - - - - -- - - - - - - -' - -� --sus= - -- ` l - - - - -- 52<)^75"- - - - - -- YOlfg es - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 Stc� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L - - - - -I - _ - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - 'WSO -37 (continued on page 2) Page I CITIZEN PETITION r The undersigned request that the Manor Lane Bridge remain open. if, � ADDFESS 6 mstxl-iZ LAtjf 901 S-t. 1 ?2" Y c rT." X20 Z�y s cJ C', 3 i CI'IQZEN PFfITICN The undersigned request that the Manor Lane Bridge remain open. NAME ADDRESS 63 Ce t� 3 LV- Z-�' �5q 1-, 63 30AivoQ �✓ /a3 x,3 30 A44AJO c L.A) .57t&- io3 1e ?3 v lKl9voic &AJ Szz- /0 3 G'S3 c> MArn c#. G-ns t 33y Jy�� 1. li 330 /YG� >c y L Gs> G 33o 1u 02 to_h e a (,1'�1Gt1v Yt1111Uv ' =The undersigned request that the Mdnor Lane Bridge remain open. V. ADDRESS 7-3 23 5. �v' . 3 C - 7 e 6S 7 3, 37 l} 1) Lam'- 1 Up J The undersigned request that the Manor lane Bridge remain open. ADDRESS C7 5al � v -Y C�cT 5a sip, 7 L 3 C., 7 V/,, 5 �,� Z:�� 7� 22 Sly(,g �f C7 5al G� 7,3.��� C�cT 7 L 3 C., 7 V/,, 5 �,� Z:�� ?�21 ScdC��f L� 71�yD A� S411/ C L3 o M4V0rz..Ar��„, 77 ,�6' UNDE'i�s /�iSI�O ���E2T Qu,,�lg Af/�NT -Vzi �4� u It �HbNr� G6, Z 66;r- 6!z - �a Gam- Q,3v t pyle65-5 66/40 S w 7 �;elf r'4ce calo� Salt/. 77 G6 0 -S- 4J. 77 _( Irc r t I /pS7o.3 Jg/ 771 -i1/� s ?a scti, 77� 65 60 sw 77 �QS�o ScJ iZ'� �eyyxc� 70-50 �j 83 � ill gA� 6St"a �cJ 77 bn S- 779a ass - "moo0 7F.o J a, - -- lo-k-.3&o - - -- - - - -- - - 4 - - -- — . I 6200 Sunset Drive City of south Miami INTER—OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Marien Aran- Spinrad pATEk May 20, 1988 Director, Building, Zoning and Community Development FROM` SUBJECT: Danilo Lopez Staff Report PB -88 -009 Planner SMH- Signage General Data ApplAcant: South Miami Hospital Foundation Request #1: Variance to allow one directional sign of 2.5 sq.ft. in a District (Commercial Office) where two directional signs not to exceed 2.0 sq. ft.> each in area are allowed. (Section 6-3 Zoning Ordinance) Location: Ambulatory Care Center 6240 Sunset Drive Request #2c Variance to allow one directional sign of 39 sq.ft. in a District (Commercial Office) where two directional signs not to exceed 2.0 sq.ft. each in area are allowed. (Sec. 6 -3 Zoning Ordinance). Location: SE corner of Sunset Drive and 62 Place. ('Advance Tower Building, 6262 Sunset Drive) Request #3. Variance to allow three directional signs of 2.25, 22.75 and 39 sq.ft. respectively in a District (Commercial Office) where two directional signs not to . exceed 2f0 sgft* each in area are allowed. (Sec. 6 -3 Zoning Ordinance) Location: Diagnostic Center 6200 Sunset Drive Request #4. Variance to allow a detached sign in a District (Commercial Office) -where it is not allowed. (Section 6 -3 Zoning Ordinance) Location: Diagnostic Center 6200 Sunset Drive 4t Background After several discussions with Staff, Mr. Tom Graboski, Designer, presented to the Environmental Review and Preservation Board a Signage Plan for the South Miami Hospital campus. Some signs were to be located within the officially designated Planned Unit Development (PUD), while others were to be placed outside the PUD boundaries. The proposal for PUD signs received a final approval from the ERP Board on April 19, 1988. However, _signs located outside the PUD were given conceptual approval only, pending the granting of variances by the City Commission. Explanation Mr. Graboski's proposal calls for detached signs (identifying businesses) and directional signs (to help direct the pedestrian and vehicular traffic). The PUD signs were judged by the ERPB on their own merit and according to PUD standards. The non -PUD signs, located in the Commercial Office District (CO), although preliminarily approved by the ERP Board, require a variance as: 1) no detached signs are allowed in the CO District and 2) the proposed directional signs exceed the allowed square footage. After the Notices of Public Hearing were sent and the advertisement in the newspaper was made, South Miami Hospital's representative (Mr. Bill Enright, Assistant Planning Director) inforemd Staff that request #2 was not going to be pursued. Therefore, in this report, only requests 1, -3 and 4 will be discussed. f Y Analysis Please refer to Inter-Office Memorandum from Danilo Lopez, Planner to Marien Aran- Spinrad, Director, of April 8, 1988, Exhibit 2. Also, refer to Exhibit 3, "Sketch of Requests ", for ;a graphical representation of the variances being applied for. Request #1 Is for a directional sign (25 sq,.ft.)_.showing the p-arkin -for the Ambulatory Care Center. Request #3 Culls for three directional signs to be placed on the Diagnostic Center grounds Two of ahem -(3b, 30 would direct vehicular and pedestrian traffic through different types of services provided by South Miami Hospital and one (3a) would indicate the location of the Ambulatory Care Center parking. Request #4 The Diagnostic Center has a detached sign advertising the premises. A variance was granted to the former owner' of this land to put up this sign (Ordinance #2 -80 -1061, Exhibit A) "in place of any sign on the building". The existing sign is 4'0" height. The proposed sign would be 5'0" height. As Ordinance #2 -80 -1061 specifically approved a 4'0" height detached sign, and additional variance is required, either to complement the fist one or to replace it. The Ambulatory Care Center has two flat signs (temporary permits were applied for and granted by the City Manager). The proposed detached sign for the Diagnostic Center would be double faced and would advertise both the Diagnostic and Ambulatory Care Centers. EXHIBIT l SITES AND REQUESTS FOR SIGNS - SOUTH MIAMI HOSPITAL Site l Allowed Request Description Ambulatory Care Center 2 directional signs #1 1 Directional sign 6240 Sunset Drive 2 sq.ft. in area 2.25 sq.ft. in area (Seca 6- 3- 5.03) Site 2 Diagnostic Center 2 directional signs #3 a) 1 directional sign 2 sq.ft. in area 2.25 sq.ft. (6 -3 -5.03) b) 1 directional sign 22.75 sq.ft.(6.3.5.03) c) 1 directional sign 39- sq.ft. (6-3-5.03) #4 1 detached sign 22.75 sq.ft. Recommendation General Section 6 -1 -1.05 of the City's Zoning Ordinance defines "Directional Signs" as: "A sign which transmits information which facilitates vehicular access to and from off - street parking or drive -in facilities but does not in any way identify or advertise the use of the premises." Staff understands the Applicant's objective to provide a uniform signage for both PUD and non -PUD buildings. Nevertheless, and strictly adhering to the above cited Ordinance, directional signs should not advertise the use of the premises. Requ=est 2, 3b, 3c and 4 have the logo, SMH, which is an advertisement of the premises. Staff recommends the elimination of SMH letters from all signs outside the PUD. Request X61 2.25 sq.ft. directional sign for Ambulatory Center. Staff recommends denial. The proposed sign is only 0.25 sq.ft. above the allowed 2 sq.ft. size for directional signs. it would be easy for the Applicant to reduce the size of the proposed sign without any hardship. Request #3 Three directional signs on Diagnostic Center grounds. (3a, 3b and 3c) 3a: Directional sign indicating parking for the Diagnostic Center. Staff recommends denial. The sign can be reduced to comply with zoning regulations. 3b: Double faced directional sign indicating location of Diagnostic and Ambulatory Centers, 22.75 sq.ft. Staff recommends denial. This sign would advertise the Diagnosstic Center which does not comply with a directional sign definition. 3c: Triple faced directional sign, 39 sq.ft., indicating the location of Emergency,` Main Entrance, Diagnostic and Ambulatory Centers. Staff recommends- denial. This sign would advertise the Ambulatory Center which does not comply with a directional sign definition. r - Request #4 Double faced 22.75 sq.ft. detached sign for Ambulatory and Diagnostic Centers. Staff recommends denial. The Applicant already has a variance for a low profile sign to advertise the Diagnostic Center. Staff's recommendation is that this same sign be rearranged to advertise both premises, the Ambulatory and Diagnostic Centers. The sign would have to be no more than 4'0" in height as per Ordinance #2 -80 -1061 (Exhibit 4). DL /am Exhibit 2 city of South Miami INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Marien Aran- Spin owTC: April 8, 1988 Director, Bng and Community t raoM: auuCC T: Danilo Lopez South Miami Hospital Planner Signage Proposal General 1. Our Zoning Code does not address sign regulations for the Hospital District; it does address regulations for signs located within the Commercial Office District, in which two of South Miami Hospital's buildings are located, namely: The Ambulatory Care Center and the Diagnostic Center. 2. Regulations governing signs within the Planned Development Hospital District (PD-HD) are found in: a. Zoning Ordinance Section 16 -4 -7 "Signs and Lighting ", PUD General Regulations, which reads "The number, size, character, location and orientation of signs and of proposed lighting for signs and premises shall be such as provide for the safety of vehicular and pedestrian traffic and for compatibility and ,harmony with nearby and adjacent properties and the general character of the area." b. Zoning Ordinance Section 16 -50 -6 "Signs and Lighting", PD -HD regulations, which reads: "AS a part of the application for special use approval of PD -HD development, the applicant shall present a general plan as to how signs and lighting visible from public ways outside the development are to be treated. Such general sign and lighting plan shall include: (a) provisions for the lighting of public ways on the boundaries of the development and on public ways which may run through the development - general types of lights, standards, candlepower, and the like, (b) demonstration of the adequacy and suitability of lighting utilized in critical areas such as emergency entrances and main access drives, (c) special consideration shall be-given to lighting plans utilized throughout designated j on -site parking locations in order to diminish shadow areas, dark spots or other potentially hazardous conditions. (d) a proposed set of draft conditions• for signing as to type or character, size, limitations, and the like throughout the development where such signs are to be visible from public ways. ,. Exhibit 2 In deciding ,upon whether or not to approve the general lighting and sign plan or to approve it with modifications, 'the standards of Section 16 -4 -7 shall be utilized and as additional standards (a) the relationship of proposed signs and lighting to security and safety from crime of occupants and visitors to the PD -HD development and of passersby on public ways, in order to _provide maximum security form crime, (b) roof signs shall not be permitted, (c) low profile landscaped signs and flat signs shall be encouraged, and, (d) signs and lighting shall be in character with the nature of the development and the---area surrounding such development. In the preparation of final plans, should the applications for special use approval for PD -HD development be given, the applicant shall include listings, types, and locations for all signs where such signs are visible from public ways. For the purpose of this requirement, major access ways within the development may be considered as public ways in addition to the adjacent public rights -of- way,." C. Resolution No. 54 -85 -7019, from the City of South Miami creating the South Miami Hospital Planned Unit Development, which in its Section 3.h reads: "NO Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued for any completed stage or sub -stage until a directional signage plan for automotive vehicles and pedestrians,, with and without the project, has been approved by the Director and such signs are in place." d. Exhibit, 85 of the South Miami Hospital PUD application, "Site Signage" (attached;), which shorts all the approved off -site directional. signs. I understand this is the Directional Signage plan approved by the Director. There Is no reference in our Zoning Ordinance to off-site signage, thus, they are prohibited in our City, except for those approved for this project under - Resolution No. 54 -85 -7019. The PUD application calls for "low profile landscape signs" which would be "in character with the nature of the new and existing areas around South Miami Hospital". Existing Signale 1. Within the official PUD area there are the following signs: 73 Street 6 62 Court: Flat sign, "SMH lobby entrance. 62 Avenue entrance closed" Directional, "Emergency, outpatient, Parking" Exhibit 2 73 Street between 62 Place and 62 Court: Detached /Directional, SMH, Entrance, Admitting" 62 Place 6 73 Street: 2 Detached /Directional "Emergency" Detached /Directional, "Emergency, Outpatient" 73 Street West of 62 Place: Detached /Directional, "Outpatient Parking" Parking lot at 73 Street: Detached /Directional, "Outpatient, Physicians, Employees, Visitors" 62 Place: Detached /Directional, "Hospital Parking, entrance on 62 Court" 62 Avenue 6 73 Street" Flat, "SMH Education Center" 2 Detached /Directional, "Emergency, Main Entrance, Outpatient" West of 62 Avenue Low Profile, "SMH Tower Building" Detached /Directional, "Parking for. Doctors" Detached/ Directional, "Reserved for second shift employees o nl y.+ 62 Avenue US 1: Flat, "Receiving" Flat, "South Miami Hospital" 2. Outside the PUD boundaries, there are the following signs: Sunset 6 62 Avenue Low profile, "Diagnostic Center" (variance to former bank) Flat, "Diagnostic Center" Sunset & 62 Court 2 Flat, "Ambulatory Care Center Grand Opening" 1 Flat, same copy, back of building (violation Directional /Detached, "Parking for Diagnostic Center of SMH" Proposed Signage 1. According to a table (attached) prepared by Mr. Tom Graboski, Who is presenting the Plan, the proposal is for 10 (ten) detached signs. Mr. Graboski based his calculations on the square footage allowed for flat signs under C -3 and C -0 Districts. There is a total of 36 signs; 29 of them would be detached. 14 of the proposed signs are outside the PUD boundaries. Exhibit 2 2. Mr. Graboski made two sets of comparisons.In the first comparison, Mr. Graboski's detached signs square footage vs. the amount of detached signs square footage allowed for C -3, two of the proposed signs are over the square footage allowed. The entire square footage proposed is 443 sq.ft. under the allowed by C-3. 3. In the second comparison, Mr. Graboski's :detached signs square footage vs. the amount of square footage allowed for flat signs in C -0 District, three of the proposed signs are over the square footage allowed. The entire detached square footage proposed is 90 sq.ft. under the flat sign square footage allowed by C -O._ Compliance with Zoning Regulations 1. As I discussed with Mr. David Henderson, Planning Technician, and he indicated to you in his March 25, 1988 Memorandum (Re: SMH Signage proposal): "The proposed signage plan includes a main identification sign to be located at the northeast corner of the SW 62 Avenue and US -1 intersection. The PUD's site plan, however, indicates that teh main hospital entrance will be located on the new SW 73 Street between SW 62 Avenue and 62 Place. The only logical location for a aain identification sign is at the main entrance. The circulation pattern that has been established by other elements of the Hospital's development plan. Although this may appear to be a minor point, it is not good practice for the City to approve a signage plan that does not reinfoce the previously approved site and circulation plans." 2. Mr. Graboski should not include building signs outside the PUD (Ambulatory Care Center and Diagnostic Center) as part of teh PUD Signage Plan. Several of the "signs refer to these two buildings. 3. Commercial Office District does not allow detached signs. The Ambulatory and the Diagnostic Centers are located Within the CO District. 4. The size' of signs within a PUD is not specifically regulated, by the Zoning Ordinance. Exhibit 85 of the PUD application does not indicate the sign dimensions proposed. Therefore, I believe the proposed signage type, location and size should be judged on its own merit, with the 'restrictions mentioned in paragraphs 1 and 2 above. DL /am cc: Commission Packet attachments < r_ f Exhibit 2 N-I JAM i> No ic F1111m ill 1 • ,, \ / 1 1 � y M� f MASPONS GOECOURIA • CSTEVt2 ' Sovrm MLMr WWffAE WYIDKUYYESSASSOCMi(S MG A! E M I T E C T U 3 CE l A N M •1 11 • KAY Mi 3n IIE• t•••1 4 Isla; • •3s 11ESMAM SMM ASSOCIATES Ibsat i+w1s } ro x x 0 3 2 4 .c w lk ro Al �t 1i } / o w b .Y v k N O Asti H ply • � • (a , m • K arr 4� O lr4 n n tD ►� • tb • a O }A }. �- W �► O K �0 lit Cq tip„ K ti a )-4 a OQ Exhibit 4 ORDINANCE NO. 2 -80 -1061 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, GRANTING A VARIANCE TO SUNSHINE STATE BANK TO PERMIT-A LOW - PROFILE LANDSCAPE SIGN, IN PLACE OF ANY SIGN ON THE.BIJILDING, WITH A FRONT SETBACK OF 4.0 FEET FROM SUNSET DRIVE INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 20.0 FEET AS TO CERTAIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6200 SUNSET DRIVE, SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Planning Advisory Board of the City of South Mia,,J, Florida, has considered the Variance hereinafter granted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That Sunshine State Bank be, and it is hereby granted a Variance to permit a low - profile landscape sign, in place of any sign on the building, with a front setback of 4.0 feet from Sunset Drive instead of the required 20.0 feet as to certain described property located at 6200 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida, and more particularly described as. Lots 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, WILLIAM A.H. HOBBS SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 111, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. PASSED and ADOPTED this 2nd day of January 1980. APPROVED: Mayor Attest: Niovrd by Mayor Block City Clerk ,•+ by Commissioner owman � tvt Passed on First Reading: 12/04/79 Passed on Second Reading: 01/02/80 X Lint: X McCann - ,e JWVERslry GARDENS NO tj YRA C r f rRA t;' a2 2, 0 1 t 5W A A ds ip 9 01h .4 1 0 14 /2 , St 54E 41 70 err to AO ic 3 s v 4 ti I. 7r, b A w 7/" Ar W. " 61 CITY AU, 5 Al '3 j 17 is 1V ) )k /5 fe r 24, to V sq, 7p. ,A ti sw Je 74 IL 70 It -N --ii, ' . f- f V .1 1 It I tic r-01 I /)-U A all fp -5)y 76 1 a Pit �� - 4 - �,y� - v �+ ►� ,,� �� - •r � ,�:• i . ..... ..... 3 4. op ib Ito APPLICANT: South Miami Hospital Foundation OWNER: South Miami Hospital Foundation MAP REFERENCE: 6240 Sunset Drive, 6200 Sunset Drive COnkIENTS: Variance to allow a Detached Sign where it is not allowed; Variance to allow Directional Signs of more than 2 sq. f+-. CITY of 5OUTM JAIAMI Pa PLANNING bOhRD Scale .j"= 3Q0! * * * * * Date. 5.... 8.. , . Drn AM ... Chk..... Hearing No.M-88-.009 'e'# r W. " 61 CITY AU, 5 Al '3 j 17 is 1V ) )k /5 fe r 24, to V sq, 7p. ,A ti sw Je 74 IL 70 It -N --ii, ' . f- f V .1 1 It I tic r-01 I /)-U A all fp -5)y 76 1 a Pit �� - 4 - �,y� - v �+ ►� ,,� �� - •r � ,�:• i . ..... ..... 3 4. op ib Ito APPLICANT: South Miami Hospital Foundation OWNER: South Miami Hospital Foundation MAP REFERENCE: 6240 Sunset Drive, 6200 Sunset Drive COnkIENTS: Variance to allow a Detached Sign where it is not allowed; Variance to allow Directional Signs of more than 2 sq. f+-. CITY of 5OUTM JAIAMI Pa PLANNING bOhRD Scale .j"= 3Q0! * * * * * Date. 5.... 8.. , . Drn AM ... Chk..... Hearing No.M-88-.009 7400 S.W. 62nd Avenue s Miami, Florida 33143 (305) 661.4611 C�h FS SOUTH MIAMI lli��WFFV HOSPITAL HAND DELIVERED May 9, 1988 Ms. Marien Aran- Spinrad Director of Planning, Zoning, and Community Development City of South Miami 6130 Sunset. Drive South Miami, FL 33143 Dear Ms. Aran- Spinrad: This letter is to address a hardship that exists on the campus of South Miami Hospital and its affiliated organizations. As you know, the Hospital has a campus signage program in the works which has been approved by the E.R.P.B. The approval was contingent upon getting appropriate variances for the properties outside the P.U.D. or H- District. I think all who have seen it would agree that the proposed signage plan which ties the entire campus together is a vast improvement over the existing signage which has developed piecemeal over many, many years. People' unfamiliar with the locations of buildings constantly express frustration at trying to find where they are going. Getting around our site is confusing and disorienting currently. However, the new directional signage program vastly improves this condition in keeping with the P.U.D. ordinance and our approved Special Use Permit. The crux of our hardship lies in the area north of the approved P.U.D. which houses South Miami Diagnostic Center and South Miami Ambulatory Care Center, both affiliates of South Miami Hospital. Simply stated, directional signs on building walls do not work. A subsidiary of South Miami Health Systems, Inc. Ms. Marien Aran- Spinrad May 9, 1988 Pa9e 2 Therefor, our request is to permit the logical signage which has be-en approved to date for the P.U.D. to be extended to the C.O. property to the north, and logically complete the@ total campus signage program for South Miami Hospital and its affiliates. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Bill Enright Vice President Planning and Projects BEzdem THE CITY OF Sout� ���iarni 6130 SUNSET DRIVE, SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 33143+ PUBLIC SERVICE DEPARTMENT Z O N I N G P E T I T I O N Property Description, Location and Legal: _ SEE ATTACHED Request: The Owners of the above property have made the following request: SEE ATTACHED Petition: We, the undersigned property owners, are within 300 feet of the above property. We understand and approve the above request. s� NAME [/ J DATE `t ADDRESS ���_--- - - - - -� -- - -- - - - - G �3 '6 Ito ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - /o//-t -k`0 Z .- - - - - - - - W50 -37 (continued on page 2) Page 1 a Oa Tuesday May 31, 19110 at 7130 pm. in the City CORm16a108 Cbssben, the Planning Board of the City of South Miami will Conduct a Public Rearing on the following matter@: PR -88 -009 Appllcast: South Miami Rospital Foundation Request fl: Variants to allow Dae directional sign of 2.5 sq.ft. 10 a District (Commercial Office) where two directlonal sign$ not to screed 2.0 OR-ft. each in area are allowed. ( Section 6- 3 toning Ordinance) Location: Ambulatory Care Center 6240 Sunset Drive Legal Description: W. A. Robb's Subdivision, Fiat took 4 -111, lots 13 and' 14 4 M 30 ft. of SW 62 Ct. lying E A adjacent Closed pat Resolution 47 -53 -5027 and V. A. Dobb's Subdivision. Plat look 46-111, E 50 ft. of lot*- 14 end �13 less 1 25 ft.lot 16 for r/w 6 V SO ft. of SV 62 Ct. hying E 4 adjacent thereto closed pat Resolution 47-83 - 5082, Publµic Records of Dada County, Florida': Request f2: Variant: to allow one directional @ISO of 39 sq.ft. in a District (Commercial Office) where two 'directional signs not to exceed 2.0 sq.ft. each in area are allowed. (Sec. 6 -3 Zoning Ordinance). Location: SE cor.nar of Sunset Drive and 62 Place. (Advance Tower Building, 6262 Sunset Drive) Legal Description: V. A. Robb's Subdivision, Flat look 4 -111. lots i loss 2S it. for r/w mad all of lots 2, 30 4 and S. Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Request 03. Variance to allow three directional signs of 2.25, 22.75 and 39 sq.ft. respectively to s District (Commercial Office) where two directional signs not to exceed 2.0 sq.ft. each in area are allowed. (See. 6 -3 goals& Ordinance) Locatfos: Disganstie Caster 6200 Sunset Drive Legal Description: V. A. lobo's Subdivision, Flat Took 4-ill, lots 17 6,18 loss t 35 ft. 6 less V 25 ft. M/L of ''lot 17 for r/s 6 S 30 it. of SV 63 Ct. lying V i adjacent closed pat Resolution 045 - 82 -5025 and loco 19 tbry 21 A S 36 ft. of lot 22 lase E 35 ft. .thereof for r/w A E 30 ft. of SV 62 Cc. lying V 4 adjacent closed per Resolution 045-63-5025 and ' S 24 ft. of lot 22 A R 55 ft. of lot 23 less E 35 ft. for r/w i E 30 ft. of SV 62 Ct. lying V 4 adjacent Closed per Resolution 045 - S3 -5023 Public Records of Dade County. Florida. Request 14. Variisce to allow a detached sign In a District (COBSOCClel Office) :bare it is not allowed. (Section 6 -3 Zoning Ordinance. Location: DiagooettC.Center 6200 Sunset Drive Legal Description: V. A. Robb's Subdivision. Plat took 4 -111, lots 17 A is less 8 35 ft. 4 less V 25 it. M/L of lot 17 for r/w 6 E 30 ft. of SV 63 Ct. lying V A adjacent Closed per Resolution 00 82-5025 and lots 19 thru 21 A R 36 ft. of lot 22 less S 35 ft. thereof for 4/2 i E 30 ft. of SV 62 Ct. lying V & adjacent Closed per Resolution f45- 63-5025 and S 24 ft. of lot 22 6 R 55 it, of lot 23 less L 35 ft. for t/w 4 E 30 it. of SV 62 Ct. lying V A adjacent closed per Resolution f45- 83- 5025 Public Records of Dade County, Florida. YOU ARC. NCACOY ADVISCO THAT IF ANY PtNSON OCSINCS TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MAD$ WITH RCSPCCT TO ANY MAYTCA COHSI0CRED AT THSS MEETING OR HEARING, SUCH PERSON WILL MCEO A RECORD OF THE PaOCEEOINOS. AND rea SVC" M/RPO ►E MAY NEED TO ENewNE THAT A VERBATIM *CC"* Or THE MP. CEEOINGS IS MAOC, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES INC TCaTIMONY AND CVIOCNCE WOH WHICM THC APPEAL to TO at BASt0. W.S. tK MM) PUOLSC HfARSNa WILL SE HELD IN THE COMMISSION CHAMRCaa AT TNC CITY HALL. 4110 CVNSCT DaIVE. SOVTN MIAMI, F>.OAIDN AT TMC TIME AND DATE STATED ASOVE. ALL 1MTSRasTSo PARTIES ARE URGED TO ATTEND. OBJECTIONS on ExPRCSSIOHs Or AP ►ROYAL MAY me MADE IN PERSON AT TNe MEMIHS M FILED IN Wa /TSHS TRIOR TO M AT THC HCARINs. THE BOARD REscaves INC ■SSNT TO OCCOMMEHD TO TUC CITY COMMISSION WNATEVCa THC 40"0, CO.,SIOtns 1.4 THE SCSI INTMaST rail 104E ARCA .INVOLVED. THE SOARO'S RECOMMENOATSON ON 'MIS MATTER WILL GC NCARD eY INC CITY COMMISSION 4T A FUTURE DATE. IMTEACSTSO PANTIE• RCOVCGTIN/ INFORMATION ARC ASaCO TO CONTACT THE OFFICE 00' THE soHine OIRsevom w cALtme sn-Twl Oa sY wa/TINe. REFER TO NEARING NUMBER WHEN MAKING NCMARY. -SSIwf as Re V. U -S-OR PLANNINO BOARD THIS IS A COURTESY NOTICE CITY OF SOUTH h I AN11 -ICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE PLANNING BOARD I• it. 1, 111 "Ali APPLICATION MUST BE COMPLETED AND RETURNFU, wiTH At I NEUtI;I —L) ti ,!•t•t)N TIN:, UA. *A TI) 1r 1C IWV1: 1 Cr NG DIRECTOR BEFORE PROCEEDINGS MAY HE STARED FOR r'UOL.IC I•t:�! +1' +�� i ".I CAKt J•. ( �Y t,�N! sN N71 A�, 1. +1t 1.1 i.. 17 1 11 South Miami Hospital Development Fund, Inc. _-- [_Owner : � - .If.85 OF AF'PLfCANT CITY - -- i.',7E_ Lit` P!�Il,ra. 7400 S. W. 62 Avenue South_Miam 562 -8165 tC A'E V' ^V N:! It1iHIP O:- PROPERTY UV-!AINt C, Sou_ th Miami Hospital Development Fund, Inc, __Y] _ 1960-1986 kESS OF OWNER CITY STATC �1P, PHONE 7400 S. W. 62 Avenue South Miami _ FL _ 33143 662 -8166 ,60PERTY OPTION OR CONTRACT FOR PURCHASET MORTGAGEE S NAME ANU ALUVt 5: YES X - NO NA r.PPLiC'AHT 18 NOT OWNk2R, 15 LETTER OF AUTHORITY FROrt OWNfR ATTACHCOi YES NO NA _ ',AL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY COVERED BY APPLICA -I ION 11, - 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 and_22 North of proposed 73 Street' William A. H. Hobbs t•t, CS ANO SOUNDS i ^e OF AREA COVERED BY APPLICATION 4NAbtF6 AND Of-c _IAI. WIUT"S, OF AUUTTFNIL, i•�w Sunset Drive and S. W. 52 Avenue _ J.l TONAL DEDICATIONS PROPOSED 58R U T+I FtES �' nT._U ON PMOPERT.Y i 1 Single Story; 1 2- Story PLICATION TO THE PLANNING BOARD FOR ACTION ON THE FOLLOWING. OF ZONING EXCE Pa tON _ _ t'Tr.t a- •t`t'� CHANGE — i X VARIANCE wrnr.rvU DEt 11,11. trt- t 001 - - - - - -- — +L'NT iOMt CLAS81FtCAT10N CHwNGE OF lUNtraL HEC]uF STkU ~ - -- - - 1•:..ANATION OF ASOV[ jrtr ot� A�„�„, - � /b�,�6�' �i�6•� --r-Y� f=�/z ,� �� 1��� ,�sl'� � � �=,�, � � /�i -,�h Ly fi/f ` ` �e/"�! { %' TW C71.S7;P- (C i 6,(J /77-/ 7-h .f. FOLLOWING SUPPORTING DATA REQUIRED IS 'SuGMSTTCD WITH lH +'.` API LACATtQ14. (ATTACH£O *+.£NLTO Ath} .MAC., -eoT OF APPLICATION..) CERTIFIED SURVEY — SITE PLAN PHOTOGRAYH'• STATEMENT OF REASONS OR CONDITIONS JUSTIFYING CHANGE RrQUCSTE- -D - - PROPOSED FLOOtk PLAN HEARING I -EL (CAI-H OR C:HFCK+ UNDERSIGNED HAS READ THIS COMPLETED Ar PLICATION AND REVNC,5t'Nt -i TN -F: INFOnMATIGN ANO At L Li uF'('tiM,;t11 ' •t "A FURNISHED IS TRUE ANO CORRECT TO THE BEST OF HiS KNOWI -En", Et.. I `�IGevA1.INE aR OFFICE USE ONLY ,XTE OF HEARING HEARING NO. •..,t Irl v, , —tt —T+ DATE FILED RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, GRANTING VARIANCES TO ALLOW THREE DIRECTIONAL SIGNS OF 2 sq.ft., 22.75 sq. ft., and 39 sq.ft., RESPECTIVELY IN A COMMERCIAL OFFICE DISTRICT WHERE TWO DIRECTIONAL SIGNS OF 2 sq.ft. EACH ARE ALLOWED ON PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS Lots 17 & 18 less E 35 ft. & less N 25 ft. M/L of lot 17 for r/w & E 30 ft. of SW 62 Ct. lying W & adjacent closed per Resolution #45-82-5025 and lots 19 thru 21 & N 36 ft. of lot 22 less E 35 ft. thereof for r/w & E 30 ft. of SW 62 Ct.lying W & adjacent closed per Resolution #45-83-5025 and S 24 ft. of lot 22 & N 55 ft. of lot 23 less E 35 ft. for r/w & E 30 ft. of SW 62 Ct. lying W & adjacent of W.A. Hobb's subdivision as recorded at Plat Book 4, P. 111 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, A /K /A 6200 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida. AGENDA ITEM PB -88 -009 WHEREAS, the applicant has requested variances to allow three directional signs of 2 sq. ft., 22.75 sq. ft., and 39 sq. ft., respectively in a commercial office district where two directional signs of 2 sq. ft., each are allowed and the staff recommendation is for denial; and WHEREAS, at a public hearing on May 31, 1988, the Planning Board voted 6 -0 to grant the request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE ST RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA; Secton 1. That variances to allow three directional signs of 2 sq. ft., 22.75 sq. ft., and 39 sq. ft., respectively in a commercial office district where two directional signs of 2 sq. ft. each are allowed.on property legally described as: Lots 17 & 18 less E 35 ft. & less N 25 ft. MIL of lot 17 for r/w & E 30 ft. of SW 62 Ct. lying W & adjacent closed per Resolution X645 82 -5025 and lots 19 thru 21 & N 36 ft. of lot 22 less E 35 ft. thereof for r/w & E 30 ft. of SW 62 Ct. lying W & adjacent closed per Resolution #45 -83 -5025 and S 24 ft. of lot 22 & N 55 ft. of lot 23 less E 35 ft. for r/w & E 30 ft. of 62 Ct. lying W & adjacent closed per Resolution #45 -83 -5025, of W. A. Hobb's subdivision as recorded at Plat Book 4, P. 111 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. A /K /A 6200 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida e r is hereby granted. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1988. APPROVED; ATTEST; MAYOR CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY T 4 < i RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR, AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW ,A DETACHED SIGN IN A COMMERCIAL OFFICE DISTRICT WHERE IT IS NOT PERMITTED ON PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS Lots 17 & 18 less E 35 ft. & less N 25 ft. M/L of lot 17 for r/w & E 30 ft. of SW 62 Ct. lying W & adjacent closed per Resolution #45 -82 -5025 and lots 19 thru 21 & N 36 ft. of lot 22 lens E 35 ft. thereof for r/w & E 30 ft. of SW 62 Ct.lying W & adjacent closed per Resolution #45 -83 -5025 and S 24 ft. of lot 22 & N 55 ft. of lot 23 less E 35 ft. for r/w & E 30 ft. of SW 62 Ct. lying W & adjacent of W.A. Hobb's subdivision as recorded at Plat Book 4, P. 111 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, A /K /A 6200 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida. AGENDA ITEM PB -88 -009 WHEREAS, the applicant has requested "a variance to allow a detached sign in a commercial office district where it is not permitted and the staff recommendation is for denial; and WHEREAS, at a public hearing on May 31, 1988, the Planning Board voted 6 -0 to grant the request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA; Section 1. That a variance to allow a detached sign in a commercial office district where it is not permitted on property legally described as: Lots 17 & 18 less E 35 ft. & less N 25 ft. M/L of lot 17 for r/w & E 30 ft. of SW 62 Ct. dying W & adjacent closed per Resolution #45- 82 -5025 and lots 19 thru 21 & N 36 ft. of lot 22 less E 35 ft. thereof for r/w & E 30 ft. of SW 62 Ct. lying W & adjacent closed per Resolution #45 -83 -5025 and S 24 ft. of lot 22 & N 55 ft. of lot 23 less E 35 ft. for r/w & E 30 ft. of 62 Ct. lying W & adjacent closed per Resolution #45 -83 -5025, of W. A. Hobb's subdivision as recorded at Plat Book 4, P. 111 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. A /K /A 6200 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida 6 is hereby granted. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 1988. APPROVED; ATTEST; MAYOR CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, APPOINTING ALFRED TAYLOR ACTING CITY MANAGER. WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission wish to appoint an Acting City Manager to serve until the appointment of a permanent Manager. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That Alfred Taylor is hereby appointed Acting City Manager for an indefinite term commencing June 16, 1988. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of ,1988. APPROVED: ATTEST: MAYOR CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY L"t c « RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ACTING CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY TO SPONSOR A DESIGN COMPETITION FOR SOUTH MIAMI CITY HALL SITE BEAUTIFICATION. WHEREAS, the City is considering beautification of the City Hall Site; and WHEREAS, the City is considering sponsorship of awards in conjunction with the Director of the Landscape- Architecture Department at Florida International. University. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That the Acting City Manager is hereby authorized to enter into an agreement with the Director of the Department of Landscape- Architecture at Florida International University for the sponsorship of a design competition for the beautification of the City Hall Site. Section 2. That awards in amounts not to exceed $300.00 shall be given by the City, with said funds to come form the money received from the South Miami Hospital -City of South Miami Agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of ,1988. APPROVED: ATTEST: MAYOR CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY s a RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA AUTHORIZING THE ACTING CITY MANAGER TO CONVERT A CAB AND CHASSIS INTO A TRASH TRUCK. WHEREAS, the Public Works department is in need of a trash truck for the operation of the department, and WHEREAS, the 'Administration recommends the conversion of existing equipment using governmental bids. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That the City Administration is hereby authorized to convert a city cab and chassis into a trash truck using General Welding Service Inc., from government bid no. 0439 in the total amount of $6,565.00. Section 2. That funds for this purpose shall come from Account No. 1720 -6430 entitled: Sanitation Equipment. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1988. APPROVED: ATTEST: MAYOR CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,_ FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE ACTING CITY MANAGER TO PURCHASE UNIFORMS FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. WHEREAS, the Public Works department is in heed of uniforms for the operation of the Department; and WHEREAS, the Administration recommends purchasing this equipment from governmental bid, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That the City Administration is hereby authorized to purchase pants and shirts from governmental bid no. 1147 with Garment Corp. of America, in the total amount of $3,598.24. Section 2. That funds for this purpose shall come from Account No. 1720 -5220 entitled: Sanitation. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF ,1988. APPROVED: ATTEST: MAYOR CITY CLERK i READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE ACTING CITY MANAGER TO ADVERTISE FOR THE POSITION OF ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR FOR THE DEPARTMENT O,F BUILDING, ZONING, AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. WHEREAS, there is currently an employee vacancy in the Department of Building, Zoning and Community development for an Electrical Inspector; and WHEREAS, the City desires to fill this vacant position. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That the Acting City Manager is hereby authorized to advertise for the position of Electrical Inspector for the Department of Building, Zoning, and Community Development, with the advertised salary not to exceed the rate of $ per hour. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF ,1488. APPROVED ATTEST: MAYOR CITY CLERK READ R AND APPROVED AS TO FORM. CITY ATTORNEY /o• RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE ACTING CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH RACHLIN AND COHEN FOR INDEPENDENT AUDITING SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEARS ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1988 - 1990. WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission are required by Charter to engage an independent auditing firm to prepare annual audits of the City's finances; and WHEREAS; Rachlin and Cohen, the City's current independent auditors, have submitted an agreement to provide these services for the next three fiscal years. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That the Acting City Manager is hereby authorized to _enter into an agreement with the firm of Rachlin and Cohen to perform annual audits for fiscal years ending September 30, 1988 through 1990, pursuant to the agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "1 ". Section 2. That funds for this service shall come from Account No. entitled: PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 21988. APPROVED: ATTEST: CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY /1. MAYOR RACHLIN&COHEN CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS A Partnership of Professional Associations Penthouse -1320 South Dixie Highway - Coral Gables, Florida 33146 -2964 - (305) 667 -0412 (Dade) - (305) 525 -3608 (Broward) Fax: 3051665 -7456 • Telex: 219744 ICC UR, Code No. 78 -3 - Cable: CPAMIAMI Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission City of South Miami It is the purpose of this letter to submit for your consideration an understanding of our engagement for the performance of the audit of the comprehensive annual financial statements of the City of South Miami for the years ending -September 30, 1988 -90. Our firm will examine the comprehensive annual financial statements as of Septe -:ber 30, 1988 -90 and for the years then ending. Our examination will be made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and will include such tests of the accounting records and such other, auditing procedures as we consider necessary in the circumstances, for the purpose of rendering an opinion on the aforementioned financial statements. Our engagement should not be relied upon to disclose errors, irregularities or illegal acts, including fraud or defalcations, that may exist. However, we will inform you of any matters that come to our attention which cause us to believe that such a condition may exist. Management should be aware that the financial statements are representations of management, who must accept responsibility for the fairness of such representa- tions. Your accounting department will provide us with various schedules and other informa- tion at our request. In addition, we will be available, at the City Manager's request, for consultation regarding the City's budget and other matters. Our fees for the services we provide will be charged to you in accordance with the various services rendered and the levels of skill and responsibility required for these services, but will not exceed $25,000 for the year ending September 30, 1988 and 1989 and $27,000 for 1990. Member of DR( International with Offices in Principal Cities Throughout the World Member of the American Institute of CerUW Pubic Accarnants Division for SEC Practice Section and the Private Companies Practice Section It 0 RACHLIN & COHEN Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission Page Two These fees do include printing and other such out of pocket costs necessary for the annual Certificate of Achievement filing. These fees have been proposed on the assumption that the City will continue to employ competent accounting personnel. - Should a change in personnel require us to spend extra time in training your people or in otherwise performing our services, and an extension of our services therefore appear to be required, we would consult with ycs concerning such possible extension of our services and any resulting increase in our fees. 1 Should services other than those covered by this letter be required or requested, the extent of such services and the basis for additional fees will be discussed in advance of the performance of the work. If this letter contains a correct understanding of our arrangements, please indicate your acceptance by signing, dating and returning an enclosed copy to us. Sincerely,. June 3, 1988 G. Je ry Chiocca, CPA, P.A. GJC :: clt Enclosure ACCEPTED BY: NAME a TITLE l DATE J I I 1 i 1 l RESOLUTION NO. A Resolution Ratifying the Payment for Temporary Day Laborers for the Public Works Department. WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works recommended the services of day laborers for the department; and WHEREAS, the Administration expended funds in order to pay for such services NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Mayor and City Commission of South Miami, Florida: Section 1. That the Mayor and City Commission hereby ratify the payments to day laborers for the Public Works Department from October 1, 1987, through March 25, 1988, said funds paid from Account No. 0101 -0400 entitled DIAL ACCOUNT. Passed this day of 2988. MAYOR Attest: CITY CLERK Approved as to form: CITY ATTORNEY ORDINANCE NO, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, DENYING A REZONING REQUEST FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (C -1) TO ARTERIAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (C- 3), ON PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 10, 11 AND 12, BLOCK 8, TOWNSITE OF LARKINS SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED AT PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 105, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, A /K /A 6731 S.W. 58TH PLACE, SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA. AGENDA ITEM PB -88 -005 WHEREAS, the applicant has requested to rezone his property from C -1 to C -3 designation and the staff recommendation is for denial; and WHEREAS, at a public hearing on May 10, 1988, the Planning Board voted 4 -1 to deny the request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That the request to rezone property from c -1 to C -3 designation on property legally described as: Lots 10, 11 and 12, Block 8, Townsite of Larkins Subdivision, as Recorded at Plat Book 2, Page 105 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, a /k /a 6731 S.W. 58th Place, South Miami, Florida. is hereby denied. PASSED AND ADOPTED this _ day of �_, 1988. APPROVED MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: i CITY ATTORNEY I .at• / ©0��� d 11111 1ii�i:'�R so-NJ ..._ .tea iRiiz •s,"1�1r�• en' !L'J' ...•.. / MI ttDO'� 24121 WAIX 93 �Iir'111111i�, ♦., . ��tDts � to &a 11-00 ;. Oresilrol rs-m:,.0 I IF. K! a t' A �. . . • of s .o e� r 1 r, oleos', AWBIUM cam ,? �. - ---- -� , too t@ a.�•� It 414 row U •.. s .. s 6 t t t re � v o+ 67 j f ft As ill 10 T.." S w 61 J f RR f r� ii V ! •f t, 71 7, _ V of y 1 t! _ice IS S! i i •i �� �� ,ts v , JR • of . .. j• N r i? M rRACI J ,, '' t sf �O— •� ' ' a a/ 6+ E2� 3 ra �,.. 1�t'/'7�t_j� ; s+ a• ; e, es Z TRACT / . _ s/ s� f+ i)_ +I ,�a ✓� /� �* is ei h GARDEA►S ti at fj T4 J ,;. it H ss �0 a . • TPWNSIM OF a l / T °RAC 6 7! i , 7RAC 3 h $W. 66 rt RR I , MARSNAI L �s9 tRA,; % C S.W. Sr !RACY F • J s • � i G ti /fRSJTY N/U JA MSON GARDENS NO 1 h " • PARR �• y, • .rN/rfRS/7T GARDENS 1►�01 TRAC► s rtAC, 42 9 �� n 1 , h► tl•rr� ,tip'• , r• r 1 + • !,+ � T � ,�. � J a i l• s r ti t tf a. v E• ,� 2 y v ,_ l Sw 7/0 t T v APPLICANT: Donald A. Mitchell OWNER: Donald A. Mitchell MAP REFERENCE: 6731 SW 58 Street CANTS: Change in Zoning from Neighborhood Commercial District (C -11 to Downtown Commercial District (C -2). ATV (n11TU MA tai " PUNNING b0A QD Compass Scale. Y":900 00!. , Date. 3.30.88 ........ Drn . ADL' . Chk ..... bearing No?;.-AP.-905 EoEE XAM E I� lA 1Pwc ur"" Il pwIvc4w MdwrD 0LW" - ADDRESS % MArtorrt �{o1w�S ✓ cb� SW 6-7 St. Sau-th 1Vl,aml 03 20 Oslo JG 16-7 St S004101 MIAYMI ogoc Qn�tq BIA(,K +� 54gS SW '$S ST _%A+ M{aMI log2o &�? M• Color y 5845 sw 68 i1 ra�i�, Mla+�rl oq� o h!A('!tr /uO�olC�r Ma.Ae1 i PO SOX, 1 0 -IS1 AA CAT _ .33133 oA4o �p�n PN)<4%A'6 v S tS Shr y�% S1 �a4'� + MIIM 2OO _ i ��t wr+ ht t Ei Qa v,or 1S4lo s v� 8 �8 ,AV2 !G to vn t �5i S !2iO MOW,,y iZ3o /14p o �Zaf t �aa tll� b°o41 SW I'q AVe JUtam I 3?183 Vz40 w1° I IL Zb I Ig10 The Vita►C�tok4t Cdr irNC'iswe.1 Cowl ?v {: AIDS Soo !an Remo -Ave, �G 33�yG 7� 1 I SW 6 Z �� # ?d j t�iA,,n,3ru3 t,S$c �ablr 0010 Aadp C000t -I floe ✓ Po Sax I�Svz So M,a►,n, �►3S N"3fcA FLf1 _ S -(ap Donald wi he tI C 1 I t>bS t-ricke !I VC • T +j-,O l FL 3312 L y ` t 2. PB- 88-005. Applicant: Request: MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING BOARD S/10/88 Donald A. Mitchell A change in toning from Neighborhood Commercial District (C-1) to Arterial' Commercial District (C -3).. Location: 6731 SW 58 Street Legal Description: Lots 10, 11 3 12, Blk 8, Townsite of Larkins Subdivision, Plat Book 2/105,. Dade County, Florida Mr. Robert Lederman, Attorney for Donald Mitchell, signed in and addressed the Board. Mr. Lederman presented the Board with a small package (Exhibit A) pertaining to this request. He referred the Board to Resolution No. 2335, when at that time, which was 1967, the property was owned by Mr. Harvey Herman; Mr. Herman was primarily, at that time, seeking a zoning request to have the property rezoned from C -2 to C -3.. He said that in 1967, the City did, in fact, approve and rezone the property from C -2 to C -3. Mr. Lederman said that in 1971, for which he could not find the specifics, there was a massive rezoning and block 8 in its entirety was rezoned from C -3 to RS -4. He said that at that point in time, it was anticipated that the property was going to be acquired by the City and turn the land into a park. Subsequently, the potential purchase of the property fell through, as the Federal funding did not come through. Mr. Lederman said that in 1974 a rezoning was sought on the subject property to change to C -3 usage. He referred the Board to the portion of the minutes presented which resulted in Ordinance No. 8-75 -858. He said that as the Board can see from Ordinance No. 8 -15= 858, the zoning was changed from RS -4 to C -1 which is the, subject property's current classification. He said that t9e reason for this, which is clearly stated in the portion of the minutes made available to the Board, which states as follows: "A discussion was held by the Board where it was felt that the Board members needed more time to study the area before recommendation could be made., and it was noted that this particular parcel is 75' by 146'; having a total square footage of 10,950 feet. It was pointed out by the Board that in order for this parcel to be used as C -3, it would have to be 100' by 100'; since it does not, granting this request would cause a self- imposed hardship on the Applicant." He said that at that point in time, they were laboring on the misnomer that the property had to be 100' by 100' in order to have C-3 zoning which was incorrect. Mr. Lederman said that there were square footage requirements of 10,000 sq.ft. and also certain frontage requirements Of a minimum of 100 feet, and here, the lot has frontage, based upon the street address, of 146 feet. He called the Board's attention to the Motion itself where it was stated that if the request were granted, she would be Placing 'a hardship upon herself and she would have the time to reconsider her request. Mr. Lederman said that, at that time, the Board relied on misinformation. He said that the adjoining properties next to the subject property were restored to the prior C -3 classification. 1 3 T { Mr. Lederman said that they are seeking a restoration to C -3 which should have been restored many years ago and which he feels was not restored primarily because of a misnomer because of the fact that it requires 10,000 sq.ft., which the property has; requires frontage of a minimum of 100 feet, which the property has, and had at the time of when the C -3 zoning was sought in 1974. He said that basically he is asking the Board to correct on error that was made in I974. Be said that the entire block is zoned C -3 and - directly across the street, it is zoned industrial, and, he does not thigJk that C -1 is -_ appropriate for this parcel, and he believes that in all equity the property should be restored to the C -3 zoning, Vice Chairman Hoffmann asked Hr. Lederman if C -3 was reinstated for the rest of the block at the same time as the minutes of January 14, 1975, Which Mr. Lederman presented the Board. Mr. Lederman said that he did not know if it was at the same meeting, but it was approximately the same time. Vice Chairman Hoffmann asked what is the size of the lots that were granted the C -3 designation. Mr. Lederman replied that in that subdivision the lots are basically the same size. He said that he did not know how many lots were owned by an individual owner. Mr. Carver asked when Mr. Mitchell bought the property and if the property was C-1 at that time. Mr. Mitchell replied in April 1982. He said the property was C -1 but was represented to him as C -1 and C -3 in his purchase contract. He said that on the map in the City Clerks wall the property is shown as C -3 and in the Building Department as C -1. Mr. Lederman said that there is no doubt that in so far as frontage and square footage that this property very clearly meets the current requirements for -C -3. Vice Chairman Hoffmann asked if there was anyone present who wished to speak on this particular issue. Hearing none, the Public Hearing was closed. Vice Chairman Hoffmann then asked for Staff's recommendation. Mr. Lopez said that although the proposal to rezone to C- 3 would be in compliance with the 1981 Comprehensive Plan, Staff prefers to follow the recommendations of Mr. James Duncan to keep the property as C -1, as the subject property would be like a buffer to the more intensive use to the West and the Northwest. Vice Chairman Hoffmann asked Kr. Lopez if he had any history on why this request was formerly denied other than what had been produced here and what are the differences in the uses between C -1 and C -3. Mr. Lopez replied that he had no history on the denial of the request. He also replied that the C -3 is arterial commercial, such as U.S. 1. Vice Chairman Hoffmann said since the rest of the lots are C -3, how would that change anything substantially. Mr. Lopez replied that C-3 would create more intensive uses and create more traffic. { MOTION: John Andrews moved to deny the request. Thomas Cooper seconded the Motion. Mr. Cooper said that he felt that C -3 intensive= use in this area. would be too much. He said that the C -1 uses are more suitable for this area. Vice Chairman Hoffmann said that most of the uses permitted in C -1 would not go in to this area, such as florist, gift shop, news stand, travel agency, etc. He said on the other hand, the uses permitted in C -3, one of which is plumbing shop and since Cokes Plumbing is next door, he sees an inequity problem here. He said that the only area to be concerned about is the block which is due West and that is set far back and has a tree buffer and automobile parking in front of that. At this point, Mr. Lederman said that his client, Mr. Mitchell, would be more than happy to request a change of zoning to C -2. Mr. Cooper said that the uses permitted in C -2 are not much better than the uses in C -3. Mr. Carver said that he is sympathetic to fir. Mitchell's situation as the adjoining properties are C -3, but on the other hand there are apartments across the street, and he can see how this was created as a buffer for the apartments. However, Mr. Mitchell purchased the property .with the designation of C -1. Vice Chairman Hoffmann said that as to the view, the present view is miserable and anything that could be put on that corner would be an upgrade to looking at the side of Coker Plumbing's building. He said that he did not think that this was created as a buffer and that by default the property - became a buffer. Mr'. Andrews said that if he lived in the neighborhood of the subject property, that the quality of life he would enjoy would be based on the type of services available in his immediate neighborhood, and the C -1 category is established to provide for this. He said that the types of business permitted under C -3 are not conducive to a good neighborhood environment. He said that he will let the motion stand. Mr. Lederman asked if they could withdraw the application for a change to C -3 and resubmit the request as a C -2. Vice Chairman Hoffmann said that the Board will vote on the request as a change to C -3• Vote: Approve Denial : - 4 Oppose: 1 (Hoffmann) The Motion to deny was carried. City Council Reg: Zoning change City of South Miami C -1 to C -2 South Miami, Fl. 33143 This is in regard the equitable zoning for my property adjacent to the Industrial properties. North of the Metro Station. I am also across from a large parcel of C -2 and adjacent to a number of parcels of C -3. The - former owners, Harvey &. Francis Herman, 5465 SW 85th St., state they.bougbt the property as C -3. The City records do however show me tgat they were only C -2. When HUD built their residences, Block was down graded to RS -4, and later back to C -3 by individual requests. The widow Herman was now only given back C -1 instead of their former C -2 or C -3 that she requested, letter attached. Legal Lots 10, 11, & 12 Block 8 Realty Securities Corporation Townsite of Larkins Comes now the applicant with three lots.assessed at a high high price of nearly a hundred thousand dollars and could not break even at a higher return. With a septic, plumbing operation next door and Industrial Zoning across the Street, it would enhance the neighborhood and increase our tax base to place a nice C -2 business therin. Four years ago the City expressed an interest in the lots. I offered it then at a dollar a year if they would clear and blacktop it. With no response, I did 'clear, grade and fence the property but even that doesn't stop people from using it for trash, Have advertised it for years without a request for -a businesss that C -1 would cover. Kindly return the C -2 Zoning these lots originally were twenty two years ago. All the sign, color, and building safeguards the Community has will justify a just and adequate usage. Our hundred and ten thousand investment to ,date would not allow anything but a very complimentary building to our HUD neighbors across the street. Yours sincerel , Donald A.Mitchell ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, GRANTING A REQUEST TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL .(RM-24) TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE (RO) ON PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE W. 54' OF THE N * 14.88' OF THE E. 137- OF THE N. 1,50' OF THE W. 1/2 OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF THE S.W. 1/4 OF THE S.W. 1/4 SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 54 S. RANGE 40 E. IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, A/K/A 6230 S.W. 70TH --STREET, SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA. AGENDA ITEM PB-88-004 WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a rezoning to allow an R.O. structure in an area zoned RM-24, and the staff reco,imendation is for approval; and WHEREAS, at a public hearing on May 10, 1988, the Planning Board voted 5-0 to grant the request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That the rezoning of property from RM-24 to R.O. designation on property legally described as: the W. 54' of the N. 14.88- of the, E. 137- of the N. 150' of the W. 1/2 of the S.E. 1/4, of the S.E. 1/4 of the S.W. 1/4 of the S.W. 1/4 of Section 25, Township 54 S. Range 40 E. recorded in the public records of Dade County, Florida, a/k/a 6230 S.W. 70th Street, South Miami, Florida. is hereby granted. PASSED AND ADOPTED this- day of 1988. APPROVED MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY a n � MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF TAE PLANNING BOARD 5/10/88 PB -88 -004. Applicant: Robert Strickland Request: A change in zoning from Medium Multi- Family Residential District (RM -24) to Residential Office (RO). Location: 6230 SW 70 Place Legal Description: The.W 54' of the N 88' of the E 137' of the North 150' of the W 1'/2 of the S£ 1/4 of Section 2.5, Township 54 S, Range 40 E, Dade County, Florida Robert Lederman, Attorney for Mr. Strickland, signed in and addressed.the Board. He said that the Master Plan of the City of South Miami was amended some years ago to suggest that the appropriate zoning for the subject property is RO. He said that the proposed Master Plan . does as well suggest RO for this property. He said that the request is to change the zoning of the subject property to be in compliance with the existing and the proposed Master Plan. Mr. Strickland signed in and said that the house that is currently on the property will remain essentially the same after he converts it to a Real Estate office. He said the only changes would enhance and beautify the property. J Vice Chairman Hoffmann asked if there was anyone ,present who wished to streak either for or against this request. Hearing none, the Public Hearing was closed.' Vice Chairman Hoffmann then asked for Staff's recommendation. Danilo Lopez, Planner, responded that Staff recommends approval as the request is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan of 1981, the proposed Plan of 1988 and the City Commission's recommendations in 1982. MOTION: Thomas Cooper moved for 'approval. Larry Ligammare seconded the Motion. Vote: Approve: 5 Oppose: 0 City of SouG INTER- OFFICE MEMORANDUM Marten Aran - Spinrad 0ATE: March 15, 1988 Director, Building, Zoning and Community Development 4ow SVOJECT: Danilo Loper Staff Report on P8 -88 -004 Planner Robert N. Strickland General Data Applicant: Robert N. Strickland Request: Change in zoning from High Density Residential (RM -24) to Residential Office (R0) to conform with Comprehensive Plan = 1981 as amended in 1982). Location: 5230 SW 70 "Street Legal Description: The W 54' of the N 14.88' of the E 137' of the North 150' of the W 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the SE.1 /4 of the SW 1/4 Background of the SW I/4 of Section 25, Township 54 S, Range 40 E, Dade County, Florida The Comprehensive Plan (1981) designated the future land use of this parcel as Public /Semi- Public. The zoning designation was High Density Residential (RM-24) In 1982, the City Commission enacted Ordinance No. 23 -82 -1146 (Copy attached), which among other things, changed the future land use designation of` the subject parcel to Office. The zoning designation remained the same making this parcel not in conformance with the current (1981) Comprehensive Plan. The proposal for the new Comprehensive Plan (1988) calls for this parcel to be designated as Residential Office. Explanation The Applicant wishes to occupy an existing single family residence on the parcel to operate a small real estate office. To establish this use, a change; in toning as recommended by the City Commission in Ordinance No. 23 -82 -1146 Is mandatory. Under. the Residential Office category, a real estate office is permitted. - Analysis Analysis will be made of this request vs. Section 5 -10 of the Zoning Ordinance, Residential Office District (RO). 5 -10-1' "Purpose" The proposal complies with the purpose and intent of this District of providing an office building which is residential in external appearance. Additional landscaping might be necessary as required by the Zoning Ordinance. This could be a condition to grant the change requested. 5 -10 -2 Uses Permitted Real estate offices are allowed by right in the Residential Office District. 5 -10 -3 Special Uses Permitted Not applicable. 5 -10 -4 District Regulations This Tot is 3,402.00 sq.ft. (54' front x 63' depth). This is a non- conforming lot size for a parcel located within the RM -24 District (Medium Multi- Family Residential), where the minimum lot area shall be 15,000 sq.ft., with a minimum frontage of 100 feet. Should this parcel be rezoned to Residential Office (RO), it would also be nonconforming both in area (7,500 sq.ft. required) and_ frontage (75 feet required). The setback analysis is as follows: Required -RM -24 Required -RO Existing {1- story) Front 25 25 24 .39' Ream 20' 25' 2.67' Side 12.5' 10' 3.24' Side adj to residential N.A. 25' 15.57 Side with driveway N.A. 20' N.A. Side between buildings 25' 20' N.A. Side corner 25' 20' N.A. The house setbacks are nonconforming under the RM -24 category and if the rezoning is granted would also be noncornforming in RO. . i f r 'The 3house (one story) complies with maximum height regulation allowed by both RM -24 and RO. Regarding land coverage, the house now covers 1,136 sq.ft. of a 3,402 sq.ft. lot (33X). 8111 -24. District regulations allow a maximum of 70%, while RO allows 30%. Thus, under RO, the lot coverage would be exceeded by 3%. The F.A.R. for a parcel under 10,000 sq.ft. in are in the RO District is .495. The F.A.R. for this parcel is now .33 (1.136 divided by 3.402). The lot has 2.266 sq.ft. of open space. According to RO regulations, at least one tree shall be provided for every 400" sq.ft. of landscaped open space. Thu "s, 6 trees are required for this lot. =There are three trees on this property no. Three more trees would be required in order to bring this parcel in conformity with landscape requirements for RO District should the change in zoning be granted. A continuous visual buffer shall be provided where ever an RO use abuts or' faces directly (within 50 ft.) a property zoned for single- family residential purposes. In this case, the subject parcel faces a single- family residential district (across 70 Street to the North), therefore, a visual buffer should be provided as a condition to grant any RO reclassifi.cation as per Section 5- 10-4.06 of the Zoning Ordinance. The parking requirements for office use, one parking space per each 275 sq.ft. of gross floor area. This property would require five parking spaces, which per Section 7 -1 -2.01 of the Zoning Ordinance shall not be allowed in the front yard (unless a variance is applied for and granted by the City Commission). However, due to the small size of this parcel, the required parking spaces would have to be located in the front yard, or a parking agreement satisfactory to the City would have to be submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant wishes to pursue the change in zoning procedure f irst. If the City grants the change in zoning, the Applicant would then apply for a variance to Section 7 -1 -2.01 or submit a parking agreement providing for five parking spaces. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of this request as it would bring this parcel in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan Amendment made under Ordinance No. 23 -82 -1146. Nevertheless, the Applicant shall submit both, a proper parking 'solution and present a landscape plan to conform with Articles V (Residential Office District Regulations) and VII (Off - street Parking Regulations) of the Zoning Ordinance by the time of enactment DL /am attachment t; ORDINANCE NO. 23 -8*'X- ity(o AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 3(a)(3) OF ORDINANCE NO. 13 -81 -1107, HERETOFORE ACOPT£D AS THE SOUTH MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY: CHANGING AN ISSUE AREA DESCRIPTION; CHANGING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN AND ASSOCIATED WRITTEN DESCRIPTIONS TO ALLOW OFFICE USE, SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS, INSTEAD OF THE CURRENT ALLOWANCE OF PUBLIC /SEMI- PUBLIC USE, ON CERTAIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6210 AND 6230 SOUTHWEST .70TH STREET, SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA; ESTABLISHING LAND USE POLICIES; ESTABLISHING NEW BUILDING HEIGHT LIMITATIONS; RECOMMENDING. THE CLOSING OF SOUTHWEST 70TH STREET AT A CERTAIN LOCATION, SUBJECT TO FURTHER STUDY; ALLOWING RENUMBERING AND /OR COMBINATION OF PARTS OF THIS ORDINANCE WITH OTHER SECTIONS OR PARTS OF SECTIONS Of THE SOUTH MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND PROVIDING WHEN THIS ORDINANCE SHALL TAKE EFFECT. WHEREAS, after Public Hearings the Planning Board has made its recormendations in accordance with the annual amendment procedures under Ordinance No. 13 -81 -1107 of the City of South Miami, Florida, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That Section 3(a)(3) of Ordinance No. 13 -81 -1107, heretofore adopted as The South Miami Comprehensive Plan be, and the same is hereby amended as follows: 1) Amend the Issue Areas Map on page L -36 to include the Children's Manor property and adjacent areas on S.W. 70th Street as part of area 1E (see attached map). 2) Amend the description of Parcel IE on page L -40 to read as follows: "Parcel IE The RO and CO Districts on S.W. 62nd Avenue from S.W. 68th Street to S.W. 70th Street and the adjoining areas along S.W. 10th Street and S.W. 62nd Court, particularly those areas near the Plaza 7000 Building. 3) Amend the heading "Parcel I through 1E.;. "on page 1 -65 to read, "Parcels 1 through ID..." and insert a new Section immediately after that Section and before the "Parcel 2, The Davis Nursery..." heading as follows: PARCEL 1E - the RO /CO area along S.N. 62nd Avenue and adjacent to the Plaza 7000 Building. The Office Use /RO zoned area facing S.W. 62nd Avenue from S.W. 68th Street south through Lot 2, Block 4, COCOPLUM TERRACE, should remain as is and should not be allowed to expand westward into the single family residential area. However, in the areas immediately surrounding the Plaza 7000 Building a more complicated situation exists. In fact, this area and the South Miami Hospital area are presently the only two areas in the entire City where eight (8) story office zoning districts immediately abut low and medium density residential areas. Therefore, as in the South Miami Hospital area, corrective actions are necessary to ensure that the residential area will be protected from encroachment of incompatible land uses and non -local and non- residential traffic. of As explained below, a thorough examination of the conditions surrounding the area and leng thly discussions with the property owners and residents has lead to the conclusion that the following specific policies should apply to the area: 1) Both sides of S.W. 62nd Court should be preserved and protected as a single family residential area. 2) The land use designation for the property Described as. 3) The North 115 feet of the fast y, of the Southeast : of the Southeast ; of the _ Southwest is less the East 144.0 feet; and the East 137 feet of the North 150 feet of the West 'z of the Southeast of the Southeast of the Southwest all lying and being in Section 25, Township 54 South, Range 40 fast, Dade County, Florida, "A /K /A 6210 and 6230 S.W. 70th Street; should be changed. from public semi - public use to office use (as shown in Figure L -14) subject to the following additional limitations a) The property should be rezoned to "RO ", Residential Office. b) Vehicular access to non - residential uses on said property should be limited to the streets, or portions of the streets, already having non - residential driveways (see figures L -15, 16, 17 for illustrative examples) as provided in the RO district regulations. c) Every reasonable effort should be made to preserve the existing trees on the site. d) In consideration of the shape of the land area, the fact that the Plaza 7000 Building is built on the property line, and the location of several ;major specimen oak trees on the lot, the City may need to allow some design flexibility with regard to building Width and side and rear setbacks on the western'portion of the property. (see Figures L -16, 17) Building height limitations should be as shown on Figure L -18. 4) Subject to further study, the City should take action close to S.W. 70th Street at a point approximately parallel to the west line of Lot 6, Block 4, COCOPLUM TERRACE (see Figures L -15, 16, 17). This will reinforce the division between the residential and non - residential areas and will help eliminate the intrusion of non -local and transit related traffic in the residential area. Policy number one is an affirmation and clarification with regard to this area of the primary goals of this Comprehensive Plan to protect the existing residential areas from encroach - ment of incompatible* land uses. Policy number two, provides for the change of land use design - ation and the rezoning of the New Horizons Ministries, Inc. property and the adjacent small single family house to Office Use and RO zoning. This policy is the result of lengthly study and represents a compromise solution which is acceptable to all parties. The RO use on the entire property will allow development of approximately 14,200 square feet of office space (see Figure L -16) as opposed to the 11, 550 square feet of space that could have been econ- omically built under the earlier "CO" 3 -Story alternative on the eastern portion of the property , This proposal is equitabl? to all parties because the additional square footage allowed under the "RO" alternative more than offsets the fact that this "RO" proposal utilizes more land than the "CO alternative, and yet the "RO" district regulations also t ensure that any new construction will be compatible with the residential areas across the street. in addition, the use of 2 -Story RO zoning in this area is consistent with actions taken in the South Miami Hospital area where 2 -Story RO zoning also acts as a buffer between a 6 -Story building and adjacent residential areas. Policy number three modifies the existing height limitation on several properties in the area. The affect of this modification is to reduce the current 8-Story height allowance on the property in question, and the South Miami Medical Arts Building to 2- Stories and 4- Stories respectively. The modification would also reduce the height limitation for the properties along the wastern boundary of the Sunset Club Apartments from 8- Stories to 6- Stories. All of these changes are consistent' with and an extension of the Compre- hensive Plan policy to provide a logical step down in � building height adjacent to residential areas. The recom- mended building height limitations on the Children's Manor property will be particularly important for the protection of the adjacent single family residential area. Policy number four responds to the fact that the AM peak hour traffic flow of 128 vehicles on S.W. 10th Street directly in front of the Children's Manor property is approximately equal to the traffic glow over the Brewer Canal Bridge in the South Miami Hospital neighborhood, which other studies have shown is clearly unacceptable for a residential areas. Further, between said property and S.W. 62nd Avenue there are 249 vehicles during the same period of time. This traffic situation will undoubtedly be further aggravated when S.W. 70th Street becomes one of the primary access roads to the South Miami Transit Station. Therefore, subject to further study and public hearings, it seems that the closure of S.W. 70th Street will be crucial to the long term viability of the adjacent residential area. In fact, if transit related traffic becomes a serious problem similiar action may be needed on S.W. 69th Street. In conclusion, it is the intent of all of these policies to try to create a stable residential neighborhood in this area by eliminating the threat of further office encroachment into the area. Section 2. Any Sections or parts of Sections of this Ordinance may be renumbered and/or combined with other Sections or parts of Sections of the South Miami Comprehensive Plan and any amendments thereto, as necessary, to ensure the continuity and consistency within and between the various elements of said Comprehensive Plan. Section 3. All Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in conflict herewith be, and the same are hereby repealed to the extent necessary to implement this Ordinance. Section 4. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately at the time of its passage. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 1982, APPROVED: ATTEST: CITY CLERK Passed on 1st Reading; Passed on 2nd Reading: MAYOR ..v: •a :.Hr.•l1ae.N �►••- •are.... s.eUi o....:I: :�a.�:• ern: NHf aH. Nrao Na(Nt r•ur safe Hf: +elf ►. Nr. •!a►. fl.1r rl ,�,�.r alb. r ► :rr - ftaa� s� .•�: •if ii- •ia:e• .l sa •lust .Yui /Y.. 31*100 � u�� � s s css MN ►. b !1 a. :*pos:. ar!!!!lffDlB.sa .Osseo..!.• N: ►- :if *1N +� :..► ..RNI :O•.wr.. '$....a .{stilt lfo. t.• .tlDl1l �sDBls.. �BSI.�• Df O e. :r ►s!t •s! I Blila lY.f1:O ►..90N/la�MV. •Da fY' 1 Yla C: f = ':rr .rr•or ►. iw :ve Ufill. ►:::'as . UM. r:•�YJ.ie. � Ul ► /li gaBSSi• ,� \f\ i:fri:rr !!! :1\ )lift s•a• . itiii• . Vol a•Y: : :: a, IT : :: (111 . N rr• v: :Bt{r!! d f �iliNi• .• •Osseo:. •• •Ors•:•- inn ,lip • , i r f + �, !►� �t u h TRACT 1 ra !► i 4 t V .t i --- GARDENS_ IVC 4 ilr F f r r�AC1 a- Tf ! 1 ' t• �. ?RAC to ARSNAIt re py � R1 fit. ► • ! r i ! " �' / � r� :ass �.� • , �� i - w s it "' 1 rr f' JN�YFRSITr rRAC r x i •� ' f9•a i.•'' +�� A4 s ja ,z r T Mh D 3 03 3 r j • sw A . To•• s� 6 r 1 - It r! 1 3 f rr ! ~ ro it fo r C 1 ?y APPLICANT: Robert Strickland OWNER: Robert Hendricks Compass MAP REFERENCE: b230 SW 70 Street Sca lel .L "n .30,4.. . Co;KMENTS: Change in Zoning from Medium MultiYami,ly Scat -L g{} 0 . • . Residential District CRM• -24) to Resident 1 s' • Office District CRO). Drn A01, ..Chk ., .. . C1 TV op 5OUCU AMAMI "• PLANNING WARD Hearing NOPB.'88; 009 r: t THI city OF S old Oug # 41" *Vf4acT *ROM ioulli MIAMI, MOw10A Asir ►UfLIC •tRw{CR OS PAATMINT Z ON I N G P$ T I T I O N Property Description, Location and Segal: 5?, d QJ1. C.)3;, S. 1-1 Oa •sk s Z2' z o ks. W. 70 S T� SD. o f w Y m� s s v s j ©� ,:� 16% Requests The Owners of the' property have made ; ollowing req t',• PetftioAt Wt, the undersigned property owners, are within 300 feet of the above property. We understand and approve the above request. lie 4 DATE ADDRESS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ • _ - -, - - - • • - • • - - - • - • • • • - - I / - - - - - - - • • ' • - - - - - • - r - • - - ♦ - • • . - ♦ .. • - • - •- - - - - - - - - - - ♦ • ♦ • • • • • • • • • r • ♦ • • - r r - - • - - • �•s7 (continued on page 2) Page 1 . T oZ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ • _ - -, - - - • • - • • - - - • - • • • • - - I / - - - - - - - • • ' • - - - - - • - r - • - - ♦ - • • . - ♦ .. • - • - •- - - - - - - - - - - ♦ • ♦ • • • • • • • • • r • ♦ • • - r r - - • - - • �•s7 (continued on page 2) Page 1 . T •VOLe bit SOtA 4.-MiaMi 8130 SUMS[T DRIY[, SOUTH MIAMI, FLOR1OA U14 Z O N T N G P E T I T 1 O N Proptrty Description, Location and Legal: 041.3 a =3 C\ s � 7d s 7.� o'� - <�"%� /ACS • ill / 7 n AA iS S�/ r •r 7 Request The'' Owners of the abo�..c prcj,erty ave made t of Powinq �eq Jel/t i G &V.6k';Fol'F z o,-VIA/ 6 r e L. D 1=•� o � ��sfo�N7ve,c. • ��s /,� 1 � x � � r ��v'a� /, sro2 il►'C f3LA T 11,J• ST',R /e /t Pftition: We, the undersigned property ,owners, are within 300 feet of the above property. We understand and approve the above request. DATE ADDRESS y� rA C> �/� I c 7- .. •• w - w •.� • • - • + • • • • w • • • w • • • • •, • • • .� - - • • • • •. • • - • • • - • • • • - - - - - - - - • • - - - - - - - • • . - - - - - • • • - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • • - - .. --. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - - - - - -. - - - -^ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -. - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • - - - - - - + • - - - - - - • - .. • • - - - - • - - - - - - - • • - - O -s7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -. -. - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- (continued on page 2) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • - - - - - - - - - - •• - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Page THE CITY 01 SOUA 4,Alkr » 1 6110 SUNS[T pRIVIE, •OUT?I MIAMI, TLORIDA 3210 P'VOLIC 99RViC6 0CPA!1TI4tA►T Z O N I N G P E T I T I O N Property Description, Location and Legal: Oa -34 Ae a Z o mss: ?o S Z- SA MBA 11 �. �6. 1�� G7; orN N /,5 0 or r asp a Request: The N-ners of the. above property ave made t ollowing rr q e t' ,e�sra F . ask o (2, o_ /=-4 6 m j z:s X ti - Vs /.v G .max CS' r / &49 1 Petition: We, the undersigned property owners, are within 300 feet of the above property. We understand and approve the above request. NAft DATE ADDRESS 4d � - - -(� Q+ Svtl .. • • _ • • -. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . �; � ;' Vii:- ,+,ti''• •, - • • �• • • . . • . • - _ - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - ,•�� (continued on page 2) - -Page 2 T �E 'C17X 00 _ O'd1i -,41tiaml, 0170 XUNSCT DRIVE, SOUTH MIAMI, TIORIDA 7))43 s� +t- scwv)cc [PA^TM[/+T Z 0 N I G PETITION Property Description, Location and Legal: The W 325' of the S 293' of the E 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4, Section 25, Township 54 S, Range 40 E, Dade County, Florida -less the S 50' for right -of -way. - Request: The Dvne:s of the above property have made the following request: That an amendment to the comprehensive master plan be made through a change to the future land use designation from the current C -1 zoning to the C -O zoning designation. Petition: We, the undersigned property owners, are within 300 feet of the above property. We understand and approve the above request. E - DATE ADDRESS f f3 .37 (continued on page 2) - - - - I'�qe 1