Loading...
07-25-89t, 6130 Sunset Drive REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING JULY 25TH, 1989 7:30 P.M. A. Invocation aLk Next Resolution: 87 -89 -8067 Next Ordinance: 14-89-1426 Next Commission Meeting: 8/1/89 B. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America C. Items for Commission Consideration: 1) Approval of Minutes of July 18th, 1989 - Regular City Commission Meeting 2) City Manager's Report 3) City Attorney's Report ORDINANCES SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING: None RESOLUTIONS FOR PUBLIC HEARING: q„� , 0"'"- 4. A Resolution denying -a ,variance to allow vehicular access to an "RQ" Use on a side of the property adjacent to and /or facia g property zoned for a single - family residence, on property legally, descri -b -ed as Lot 2 of Lawrence Homesites,,as recorded at Plat Book 42, Page 32, 6f-the Public Records of Dade County; Florida, A /K /A 6360 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida. (Planning Board /Administration) 5. A Resolution denying a variance to allow a nine foot fen`ce.w -here six foot is permitted for property legally des- cribed a' tracts A and B, University Gardens Subdfvision No. 2, as recorded al Plat Book'9.3; Page 3, of the Public Records of Dade County, F1ortda A /`K /A 6.11Q S1W-- 68th Street, South Miami, Florida. (Planning Board /A.dmini_stratJon) RESOLUTIONS: () 0 f q - 6. A Resolution designating John M. Corbliss- as City.Finance Director and as an authorized signatory on all Bank. Accounts of the Uty effective July 22, 1989. (Administration) ORDINANCES : FI-RST R"EADTNG 4/5 4/5 3/5 You are Hereby advised that if any person desires to appeal any decision with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such person will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the _ is based. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI', FLORIDA, DENYING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW VEHICULAR ACCESS TO AN "RO" USE ON A SIDE OF THE PROPERTY ADJACENT TO AND /OR FACING PROPERTY ZONED FOR A SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENCE,,ON PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 2, BLOCK 2, OF LAWRENCE HOMESITES, AS RECORDED AT PLAT BOOK 42, PAGE 32,'OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, A /K /A 6360 SUNSET DRIVE, SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA. AGENDA ITEM PB -89 -012 WHEREAS, the Applicant has requested a variance to allow access to the property from a side adjacent to a residential use and the staff recommendation is for denial; and WHEREAS, at a public hearing on June 27, 1989, the Planning Board voted 7 -0 to deny the request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That a variance to allow vehicular access to an "RO" use on a side of the property adjacent to and /or facing property zoned for a single - family residence on property legally described as: Lot 2, Block 2, of LAWRENCE HOMESITES, at Plat Book 42, Page 32, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, A /K /A 6360 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida. is hereby denied f ` PASSED ADD ADOPTED this ____ day of _- , 1989. _ -------- APPROVED: ------------------ 1 ATTEST: . ___ TY __CLERK _____________...__- _- __ - - -_ r CI READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: r k Me 1 \resolut \89 -012 I - ' F) f f, t �{ t k A y -y _ ... - ... 1 99 tl 1- °^ s to W � 777 3 4 i_gA s C P! AN NG BARD NC"91 E OF PUBLIC HEARING On Tuesda,, , °une 27, 1989 at 7 ; 30 PM in the Ci *_v Commission Chambers, The Planning Board of the City of South Miami will �a -- i — - -- - - -- — 5154 SUNSET DRIVE, SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 33143 I� j led OXt pale 2 � Pace i r t ! -� TO O ea. a - Budl'aling & Zolrnirg Director June 27, 1989 mo w- William A. Mackey PB °89 -01i/ City Planner Applicant; Gabriela & Carlos de Cespedes 4 H PB 89-C,12 Page t 2 RECOMMENDATION: AS Set forth in the zoning code, staff does not recommend approval of the variance request. 0 r a d 10 A decorative wall of fi.ascnry_} reinforced concretes 7W' +�; ,=�;- ��. -�. -F 9 �; .._ , �R��- �_m _ : ._ I a conlos rot.,/ a rc h 11 1e r P? June 22, 1989 Mr. Bill Mackey City of South Miami Planning Department 6130 'Sunset Drive South Miami, Fl. 33143 Re New Of f ice building f or Dr. Carlos de Cespedes Located at the corner of Sunset Dr. and S.W. 64th Ct. CITY OF SOUTH MIAM 1CATION FOR Ii ski IC HEARING3 BEFORE PLANNING BOARD (FILE IN 0'--LfcATc,1 .k. `PP ;,i''-A-r!ON M-5• eE COMPLE-rED ^NO RETURNEDt *VITH ALL REQUIPED SUpppRTING DATA TO THE OFFICE OF TmE PROCEEDINGS MAY Or STARTED FOR PIJSL'C HEARING. AS NER' TEINANT, AGENTy ETC. 5PECIFYI, de owner Ces edes p - -- -1 - Z'IRE'-,S OF APPLICANI CJT Y STATE ZIP 6-1O N. Kendall T--1r 'd am; Fla. 33156 '666-0146 I DATE 0Wt4VRS.4jP CW pokol-EltTY CSTAINEID Gabriela and Carlos de Cespedes r May 15,1989 �R OFFICE USE ONLY 1 P roz, I-j p a setith M13W INTER--OF 1CCm- Y -: Y -=.yor and Commissioners I'A!F Marcn 26, 1986 City Manager, Ingram Public.hearing on Zoning Variance requested by Dr. Peter Genovese Recommendation It is recommenddd that the City Commission deny the attached application for a variance ro the zoning ordinance provision ,discouraging side entry to R4 property when opposite single family residential property. Background Under present A6 zoning, the applicant has developer a proposal for the maximum use of his site for a building of about 5,000 . ft. on a 20,000 sq ft. lot. To accomplish this maximum lot uses he will need side entry directly oppos t0 A- ,;- single family district on the west side of S.W. 54th Court# Vhe ap- pli t has -chosen to maximize the building p�tentia �b he lot a to �i� for this variance. Under pro�aions the, 6rili ;, vehicular access is ciiseoura d ' usa o the 10 without said side entry is s _ i 'vi ,, :: .°. T "�7 I N' ` E S Fir i8 Mr. D{srukes was called on by the Chairman. He said "ine note states the Lot on the east side of Sunset/64th Court intersection." Chairman Smith said "Well, in that case it does not need a correction. Please go on counselor." Attorney Anderson said , "I represent the applicant, a partnership consisting of Drs. Roberts and Genovese. The property that we're talking about is the south east corner of Sunset Drive and 64th Court.and -I can show you some photographs of that corner, The first photo dolls depict the property and next to it there is a big hole in the ground. The second photo taken from 64th Court toward the east, The Third photo shows the property and the propccty directly behind it on 64th Court and the last photo shows the property just before you for the zoning application. "Llhe ordinance requires that when you have a RO zone and there is a single- family residential district .directly across the strut from you, that you 11 enter and exit your ­­`car from the non- residential side which in this case would be Sunset Drive. We've asked for a variance from that ordinance. The purpose of the ordinance seems to be to protect that single. - family residence that is directly opposite you. In this particular case the single -- family, residence as you can see is directly' facing Sunset Drive and not my client's property. So from the hearings before, its hard to imagine the traffic g bin: g into a' little office building on this property could in any way affect this particular property which does =face Sunset "ffrive. T 'think that if t is ""property faced us directly then you Could see there :taight be a cansideratiiri� .to, protect that property. owevet #acing Sunset Drive,, that seems to be the_sa2e purpose ©f the ordinance wav rt�tect th�att artcuiar property ate dire ea that that property does not 3� e 1 prsitt ties caceae it already faces unsex give. So s ro ecau if that P perty ".06i coned �l� p c � i da't be here torsi tt sa of the fact that it:, just;isly protects :�sgle -- family." y x ., - 4r,", Attaruey nder8tm. 1, 0 -On tt safm." '!i mint to `talk about t 1re i6 prypact a little -bit; on Sunset; - When a are required to get a petftioo of 2Qx of the V T V'T 1Z PaSe 19 ",Te did i talk to the neighbors" Attorney Anderson said, "and they all had some A. L) concern about. We found people directly adjacent to office areas did not the concern. The only thing I wanted to point out was when we enter from the 64,-.h Court side, are going to go to Sunset Drive. No reason to go into the neighborhood. The building was designed this way because of the fast traffic on Sunset Drive and because of the narrow street frontage that we have. To keep the residential appearance of the building and to avoid traffic hazards on Sunset Drive, it was determined that the best way was to have them come onto 64th Court and make a left turn into the building. This condition is pretty general on Sunset. A few buildings don't have it but where the excavation is they won't have an area on a side street that they can turn into. We felt It was a dangerous condition which we wanted to eliminate. We felt the building would be more residential-Ly appearing if we could not have to come in,UAS way. We felt It was a dangerous condition which we wanted to elimint i The Environmental Review Board has recommended that this building be approved as it is. I would be happy to answer any questions that you may have." Mr. Michelson asked "How big is the property?" Mr. Anderson said,"The property is about 70 x 144 sq. ft*" Mr. Prentiss asked "Do you have,,a proposed building ot,,slite"plalu already?, _1 would' 1 1 Ike to see bow its going, to fit on the site. If ou had a plan and how it was proposing and how this would fit into the, glary; "I'd 'be ab' - see It better. I'd be able to 9 : ive you a better Judgement.'" V -Smith asked if Mr. is Chairman had, a plan with t 'l R 'R Z, recommendation? A 2- Mr. Dismukes said "Its a fairly difficult one,_so m going to ad it again; re %a: tie 'This lrequest -is fora variance to the provis on discouraging ,,side., entry, to RD property, ,"opposite sin le to�**i r44"e iia "d' n R io'n'Lig,the applicant has devel 0 pped, a proposal, f ''.!k of pis site for a building of about 5,000 sq., ft. Without reducing tote proposed, building size considerably, 4 1 side'nentry �-Votld provide - the side entry does not open to ! size of the building, all a-- mom logical. , If, as has -been suggest no,dif ied as recomsended by the C1 design must be changed and a f ror the City's expressed concern for' residential), the granting of a,,% of desired RO scale is settled.' because I've worked with this get always recognized from talking tc that the entry off Suns et would I building were reduced in size. I was irrational to maximize all ti had to go back and talk to the CJ nf tho nn-rarrv-SMvk% #-16a* 44%,nm andfr 9 copy and-marked,, _P X entrys 3m ss th `12 dng ugret6 anlegres Add C ig bbl e prescu 'ii ., In size 'is allowed, theAsde A the maximum tions are tom ;C," to a] loo only smaller buildings, th+a entry made,,more possible. Jaview of-, tore compatible RO zoning scale 'riance should be delgyf.4_ until, the-Issue, md there Is one other: issue too Mr. Chairman Aeman and the other gentleman involved. I've their architects and representatives involved possible if not more desirable if the iey elected to go for -variance feeling that it t other regulationson the on the site. I've :y Attorney this afternoon Jri&4rdi4_Ah# - I u k bull din - ii the issue cf scale of RO bu�� ngs is decided." I-- i,ai r—aan Smith said "Now what about the safety question that Mr. Anderson. in regard to going out on Sunset?" the City Attorney,, Joe Weil wanted to be recognized. He said "I advised him that he was bound by the language of the regulation does not say to the Planner, fuse the safest possible ingress and egress' to the property. It says avoid the residential areat. I believe in his presentation to you he said he wasn't passing on that but he had made a finding that it was possible to enter without going through the residential district and he'd been by *he mandate of the lan uaae. I think he had indicated to 9 0 -you that he is not passing on what is the safest because that is not what the ordinance directs him to do. He is dealing with the possibility. If you want his opinion certainly he can give it but he is making his recommendation based upon that randate contained in the language of the regulation." Mr. Dismukes said "I do believe there is -validity without prejudi ce waiting for a decision on an appropriate scale of RO buildings what with the considerations that are coming before the City Commission, but other than that Mr. Veil is- absolutely telling what happened between us." "Basically," said Chairman Smith, �."if you want to address that you tan. In., other words, from what, I understand the City Attorney, -as . well as, staff. is BAY Ytt ,- they're going on strict instruction p4. o f t hs ordin"dis; Ot--that doesnit mean at, , the --,City mv� there might not be a safety b which may Commission bearing address In the futurt, ifhl'&�IWA , 6 1 pplicati6ii',, the petitioner can - either.. "'d' Vith the or else they go , vote:tonight ran wait until that As address'a,before- the City Commission and then go.t en, the City -Commission is going to address these questions .1 can't at this. Intl_ answer*, Olft p se of the code. We are, as I'm sure you are all aware un'4' '*a mandate fr e 1985 session of the Florida, Legislature regarding PTqprebms1ve-1­Plans. There fc� i':,,t '6,. rt ac-, 't �V=r are pending be g Depa i� t,:_ixf, CO=Uniq b tial a bead when the'Department of - Community Affairs reports tiadk t Ul�g i4lit — 9 the ure,'o", 4, April session. I can't sit here ''tonight, nor can the Director -Of''Pla nn no W -77`�4' give this Board . or counsel for the applicant, assurance Po W I , going to be done within a short time. If you've read'the.pioposed regulation I haven't seen the 5th 'or 6th, draft but I understand I it was considerably iderably lese* - Haw quickly are we going to deal with this 'small problem within the present zoning ordinance I can't give you an answer." Chairman Smith asked Mr. Anderson "If you would like to continue, please continue." Mr. Anderson said "The way the ordinance reads as I understand it is that if its possible for us to come in from a non-residenti,al street such as Sunset Drive, we have to-do that and that's why we're here for the art bee a'u's'-'e of the way the ordinance reado.,- The point that I Sri to #re> that the ,only 'r,eason that its in t r 4 be o inante' a t 4 q.s 21 1he fDne ?Rµt asked for the i{i it itixg " L­ "a house were not zoned single —famlly we would be able to come in from the side street and we wouldn't have to be here. That house isn't facing 'vs, its *acing Sunset urive. We feel that the application for variance is justified. We know what the ordinance says, that it is possible to come in from Sunset. We feel that we could actually have more floor area than what is in there now. I don't think we have reached the maximum. I don't see that we could actually have more floor area than what is in there now. I don't 'think we have reached the maximum. What I'm trying to show you is that the only reason that its in the ordinance at all is because of how the ordinance reads. The point that I tried to make before was that the only reason that was in the ordinance is to protect that one house that's right down the corner there that asked for the zoning. If that house was not zoned single- family we would not be able to come in from the side street and we wouldn't have to be here. What I'm trying to say to you is that'house doesn't really need the protection because its facing Sunset Drive. We feel the ap -_,.. plication for variances is justified. We know it is possible to come in from Sunset. We feel that we could actually have more floor area than what is there_, now. We feel that it is a such better solution to having people atoppin$ slowing down on Sunset and waiting to get into a building possibly and have a rear end collision of Sunset Drive. We .feel the whole thing works out much. better.. That's why we're here. We feel that the whole thug writs outGh.... better as far as the appearance of the building' And the safety factor ` Mr. Prentiss asked' "Did the Environmental Review Board approve t'� <� 'M .. a Mr. Dismukes `said"At a Pre. Iminiary hearing of the Enviromaett . �• by a vote of d kv ", oved the Flan you've 4ust seea,,_ were made by members Which are in the record and they thou job at adapting the'exterior of the building." Chairman Smith asked "Is there anybody else for the record.:: sign in and stata your nm�e.' *M, name is Tanis Altemus,,7330 S W. Goth Court. I've been.11stening meh here discussag safety. of _.vehicular traffic as' oppose°1 .fro eft t entering off of►h Court as opposed to 64th Court. E °m athz, w 3 year old son, there are at least 8 other children on this`;t�ceet, ay on this street. To me the concern for their well being is :Uuch +greaty� the concern for adulti -A are alledgedly licensed to drive an'the ro ands should know'how to' get ':in'and off of heavily trafficked roads."_' Chairman Smith said'"Anybody else for this petition please'state your name and address for the record and please sign in." "My name is Bob Altemus, I live at 7330 S.W. 64th Court. Mr. And erson'in his sed comments to your group indicated that he went around or cau to have col versation with neighbors in the area. I certainly lived within 300. feet of this property.` Nobody came and asked me. His photograph I s which 'm now Just: seeing for the first time do show the property in question, do show the house across the street from the previous application, but., ji— ` Is ° photograph that is shah directly, south on both Court and tRhe & ; ,x:''k= a..Ry' �a'8v; a %0 wzvlu see a ^. ighborhood of entirely single fa -.41y dwellings, of myself my wife and some of my other neighbors back there was trying to count up the number of kids that live on 64th Court. Children who are all less than 4 or 5 years old. and I've recounted 8 that we know of. When I come home at the end of the day from my work and I turn onto 64th Court off of Sunset, I usually see one or two or three mothers with their children on tricycles driving up and down the street. Its a very pleasant way to end the day. To come home from,the hustle and bustle of the City. The applicant is requesting a' variance so that the traffic and the patients of the medical office will be able to not have to -turn on Sunset but It urn on 64s..ta COtIYt• if they cOIIiC' out OA 64th Court, theyrie.going, to go back to Sunset and have to go back to it anyway. What is the difference in turning from a stop sign onto Sunset as opposed to turning out from a driveway to an office building. I see none. The other alternative I see as they.-come out of the parking lot onto "64th Court they may turn left. These :people _are not residents. They're not going to be aware that if they turn left they are not going to run into "a dead end street. Its blocked off. They're going all the way down to the end and have to come all the way back again. I hope you consider these points."'. Chairman Smith asked if there was anybody else. He asked that the person please state their name and address and sign in. "My name is Dr. Shurley, I reside at 7230 S.W. 64th Court.. one of my children` is a 3 year old that's riding his tricycle -lu the street• I ;ve got a six am PRI old that I hope some day will be able" Cc���ay th8 ekes that I With what we've done with 64th, Court t�y�" et�i . �� �t '64:th Cc nr due to the South Miami:; Hospital 8 test apt 'f e I traf Ic n e� � :� _ control. If you allow the parking 20 - ep311 uu M art, ;there gonna be people that are aware enoug`�i ��tfie s3 tit 'lest if they � left down 64th Court,. take auotW'w legit andv tek ae 8 e -a r ._ they' ll go down Manor Lane and, pome back out can fisua am sa .nt�ever .havo "to .gat oar. Sunset Drive. And I can appreciate the situation but 0_ Os something -that's what h4th Court residents cannot afford �t' havei been closed ,bff..: iietly'�rhy re ve been tzyis g 't+ e p s tress nu _ our neighborhood andi' just doAtt se - e e how, an ybody max -out' building as apparently this has been lanned, could �t us to sit4hy't have them drive up and i3owo our efts' far ,their own smuts end tls doctors that are there, I really , appreciate th+e ;fact „that hey'ite go�. z be talon care of the elderly and the sick and the �qa g y y ve got problems enter rig and exiting-off of Sunset. Buts they don't live there and they're gonna come and visit our neighborhoods and Z don't want them in there and I would appre- elate it if you people would see that they `do not get on to say street." Chairman Smith, "Alright thank you. Is there anybody else against. Dr. Feagans, will you please state your name for the record." ' "Dr. Janet Feagans- Launcelott. Pretty much for some-of the reasons that have already been stated.. I don't have anything new, but I will`restats it..T had a problem with, signing that petition that went around and ,woulc,lso I 7777'�4 tt Mason he p ro property drecty, a hevese's state that Mrs. Walter Sco property also had a problem and did not sign the 1)eti: i' nr IrsrAeo�n F �r, KV,r s" i'!'4.'•9m- i 2 C n t rn ke it here this evening and she asked that I spew: for her. I think «iy this has come before the Board is as the people have mentioned, the buildinx was designed to the maximum as could b�,designed. i understand that it even includes an air conditioner sittingjthe front of the building a--1 that is another reason why there is a need to bring the driveway out onto 64th Court. I would like to point out that the amount of traffic that will be generafed down 64th Court will be tremendous. You will be able to go down 64th to 74th Street or at 74th Street and 64th Court, have the option of going left one or two blocks and making another left and going back out to Sunset and I will point out that what goes one way goes the other way. There will be a- tremendous amount of traffic generated and is being caused because the building is overdesigned, i frankly do not u-nderstand the tern in Mr. Anderson's letter about visual detraction. I understand that he states in his _letter that there js a hardship on the .- property, I suspect the hardship is economic because if he has to redesign his building he may have to lose 'a little bit squire footage or officel srace. I would also like to point out although access ante Sunset would, be..-.-,, difficult, one would have to.slow down. There are people who manage to get in and out of McDonald *s on U.S. 1 and "that is probably a worse` situation.` I would like to ask you to vote against this zoning variance request." Chairman Smith said ""If :-there is inybody else, will you please step to the podium and sign in on the clipboard." name is Judv Bass. I live at 3b20 S.W. 64th Court. Y one of sever ?.z =: "O.K. thank you counselor, I appreciate it." said Chairman Smith. "is there anybody else, if not we will consider the public meeting closed." MOTION By Richard Prentiss to deny _ WM INAIT �1 IN, .,'iES Fa2,e ire Chairman Smith said "I'm glad the City Ar- tcrney is here since I'm right next door or across the street and as I said before I have no financial interest and I can vote on it a ^d that's still yotr opinion. Is that correct sir ?" The City Attorney Weil said "For some reason, my opinion hasn't changed in 2h hours and it is not necessary for you to file the State forty of conflict." Mr. Perry asked "Is it possible for the building to be built so that you can ingress and egress on 72nd." Mr. Smith asked Dismukes if that was true and Mr. Dismukes answered affirmatively. Chairman Smith said "I basically believe that any. cars ;going on Sunset Drive will be a traffic hazard that have to go in and-out on- sunset. Drive._- i would hate to see the first accident that's gonna happen in that area : - T sympathize with the residents but on the other hand I happen to think the applicants -_ feelings should be addressed by the Commission in the affirmative,,Ahd I would have to say I'm not for denying this particular variance because.,o.f that situation. I think its a real hazard. Mr. Michelson, 'go ahead." - "Mr. Chairman, "said Mr. Michelson, "my understanding Is that` the eataq is underneath the building, and then comes out. At first flush i+�i notua�d±s -- stand there was to be parking below. If there was 'so park tg re ow - dw definitely understai.l the w8f you would necessarily have, entrance to this thin$. ° =As long as you, have to cralui t to the parking ,under aay jieircumstances 1 have at e i K . to: come in anywhere bunt at the front. Mr. Prentiss said "With all due respect„ l&r. Chairman, J .. feel tat the, safety of ;people who are not in vehicles _is mo a concxn : rt eopir :ha�tJ vehicll.and.# -feel that what were 'ta arc aafe�s :t►at lieop who, are driving cars, if you get hit while in a car its a lot safer -than if You. were a child on a +tricyle and : a - persaa walking ,, 1 vea�y f wIt11 th+tr traffic oa 64th .a,- and the ape±edway � �I �..,z - - sympathize very much with `hoe€ `p+eople,.that came" ant op'th� the told be ,a tendency; for people who were strangers to the area to 'gt rt . and come out even faster- than they went dawn. -Therefore, I ,feel .anythfng that I would encourage' -this should be not', passed. Chairman Smith, "I think that the safety of pedestrian are just as Uportant as i people in cars and there can be walking on Sunset Drive that could get hurt." Mr. Perry said "What's the difference in coming out unto Sunset Drive from_ the building and coming out from Sunset Drive and 64th Court?" Mr. Dismukes said „first of all, you'd be creating two points of entry that's very 'close to one ;another. That in itself would .create an additional:crub cut." Kra Coburn said "Well,? -w talking about safet ft _ -vF � 4, l f a 3 .. Y. i 3 S -Wi e saw � u r x6� .: Page 25 is something that needs to be discussed because the code states the access should not be on a residential street where it can. be avoided and I think that's pretty much black and white, but if you want to talk about safety, this is also adjacent to a school zone and by requiring the parking to be directly unto Sunset only and not on the side street would mean the cars would have to turn right and there will have half as much jeopardy to the school children that would be on both sides of Sunset." VOTE ON 140TION: MR, COOPER YES MR. PERRY - YES MR, COBURN YES MR. MICHELSON - YES . MR. PRENTISS YES REV. STANDIFER - ABSTAIN Chairman Smith "Rev. Standifer would you tell as why you're abstaining is there a conflict or something of that nature ? °t Rev. Standifer said "Not really,, '1 think that letter I received from the Planning Board said if you 'abstained and have it in right,' the power was 10 days before the next meeting." "We are forturnately enough to have our City Attorney here," said Mr. Smith "and he will give us an ,opinion as ,tp whether you can abstain or not; The only `I believe that you.-,-can abstain-:" if you had a financ y.Interest nr. if the was $conflict s y Joe Weil, City %r ea fires under public meetings# 82.86 that :a member cifcarc.; it be the legislative :body advisory body, or any vocal gone " v -board, is ;required to vote present' unless their have' °is confl+c �°o' terest as defined' by {at the Florida StAtute.1 In which Case- theytre prohibited to vote and mkt #i11 out the appropriate ,form promulgated , by. the commission an Tthicas. xf geK. Standfer's: chuxc is ;n,hrea�uld be "affected it some; �+rayy outcome..nless .►e. is abstaining' n the .basis of conflict,-_he_ canit, atistein." VOTE ON MOT �3 -'YES, 2 -NU (Standife nil it ` :r Chairman Smith said m going "�to �iV 3 saving early and Mr something to saybefore I leave early. I saw Channel °10's:courageouo editorial on video cameras or cameras in the voting booth.. ibis is .a question of something that is timely and -of grave concern to citizens of our ,St- te^and City. Any type of intimidation' implied or otherwise, as far as I'm concerned, a video camera in the election palling area can not be tolerated in a free society. As an act of principle and conscience I can no longer not speak out on the fundamental - constitutional principles of the citizen's right to vote in a private and coerced manner in the privacy of a voting poll and booth. Therefore I can no longer support or serve Mayor Porter for allowing a video , camera or any cameras in the polling area in a city election. I respectfully submit my formal` resignation as 'Chairman and member of the Planning Board lor the reasons 'I already stated. Mr. Michelson will you please take v z ,wank.. YOU* ew +�? H � .c a -C>3 Z O N I N G F E T I T I 0 N E Cora" r=ued } We, the undersigned property owners, are -ithin 300 feet of the above property. We understand and approve the above request. A RFS0LU'I"!0NN CF WJk,YIOR AND C'01`11- N!-SST,',)N OF 'I"HE CiTY OF SQUI-111"HI FLORIDA D ENYTN TIIE REQ'JI ST PETER GENOVESE FOR A VARIANCE TO THE ZONING CODE WHEREAS, on February 25, 1986, following a public hearing, the KlanroLng Board of the City of South Miami recommended to the City Commission that the request of Peter Genovese for a variance from the zoning code of the City of South Miami to permit vehicular access to an RO zoned parcel of property from the side facing prope"a—i--y zoned for Single-Fairtily Residential be denied; and, WHEREAS, the City Commission has held a public hearing to "ESGL IT! ., 4S ( Cn.t � IN! r 1 RESOLUTION Nu. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 33 -85 -6098 WHICH RESCINDED RESOLUTION NO. '18 -85 -60,84 AUTHORhZING CERTAIN PAYMENTS TO RALPH W. SYMONS. CCOMM. BROWN FOR PENSION BOARD) Item removed from th_e agenda by interim City Attorney with the consent of the sponsor, Commi's'sioner Brown,at the request of the pension board. (See City Attorney's report, page 2) RESOLUTION AND ORDINANCE FOR PUB tC HEARFNG: #86 -03 Applicant: Peter Genovese, M.D., General Partner, 6343 Building, A Florida Partnership Location: Lot 2, Block- 2, LAWRENCE HOMESITES, Matt Hook. 42 at Page 32 of the Public - reaSVri .,fob the Y a ±ce request i -_4 fake> -thy ant° a .+ i f'^aitt of the building to the side, FS.K. 64th C ijr-C ` : Tl because, in his opinion, that the traffic on Sunset Or` into the building hazardous. All those visiting the first time may miss their turn and! must drive through to circle the block = back out onto Sunset t rtve.` The al willing to past signs:. "Right Turn' Only ", as recommender Review and Preservation Board, and noted to the Commis{ this building have already been approved by both that 1 Board. !ea ?ntal Planning 2} Mr. Peter Wilson, 7341 S.W. 68th Court, spoke in opposition to th.e ingress and egress which would create traffic problems an S W. 64th Court. He urged that under no circumstances should veh_icut'ar egress and ingress be ,►ermitted from R-0 buildings into the residential neighborhoods._. 3) Mr. David_40d,C604- 6556 S.ii.` 7, th Terr, s oke a a� 1 - D 8�.- would I ire . a Recor 4..of Dade County., Flortda. Address: 636!Q-Sunset Drive CSF_ corner, Sunset s 64th Court} _ _ Request; Variance from City of youth l tams _r ilydi64nce to peratit:.areh #eiet:. to cresidential offtce used �ft��t� - facing property zoned for 'si�ngie -faml j 4 residential `pur oses (Rti District � N R ` Reg ffl ulation 5 -10 -4.31 } ��° 1) Michael Anderson, attorney ith`� ffices at 10762 s.it 1 4 If et addressed the Come.iss,ion:.repr.esen.ting. the a!ppl- i.tant,k.He explained :tt -.. " -' reaSVri .,fob the Y a ±ce request i -_4 fake> -thy ant° a .+ i f'^aitt of the building to the side, FS.K. 64th C ijr-C ` : Tl because, in his opinion, that the traffic on Sunset Or` into the building hazardous. All those visiting the first time may miss their turn and! must drive through to circle the block = back out onto Sunset t rtve.` The al willing to past signs:. "Right Turn' Only ", as recommender Review and Preservation Board, and noted to the Commis{ this building have already been approved by both that 1 Board. !ea ?ntal Planning 2} Mr. Peter Wilson, 7341 S.W. 68th Court, spoke in opposition to th.e ingress and egress which would create traffic problems an S W. 64th Court. He urged that under no circumstances should veh_icut'ar egress and ingress be ,►ermitted from R-0 buildings into the residential neighborhoods._. 3) Mr. David_40d,C604- 6556 S.ii.` 7, th Terr, s oke a a� 1 - D 8�.- would I ire . a ME = � G } T Ni r' , C io 11 T I , I L, 1 � 1 5,1 �1 I Lj 6411 Sil' lixU I NU E 4 M s. Doris R o s e b, r g, displayed a traffic pattern 0 � diagram to the Commission which shows the many p ssible ways to enter and leave the neighborhood once exiting this RO builAing into the residential the I g n e4 1 ­ h bo r hood • She no td t tiumber of youlrlg f ; ' ; es wi th smal 1, chi 1 d ren who live in the area and explained the traffic flow would be a very dangerous situation. 5) Ms. Janet Feagans-Launcelott, 7310 S.W. 64th Court, speaking for her- self and her neighbor Ms. Edith Mason, spoke against the increased traffic in this residential neighborhood. Ms. Launcelott stated her feeling that overbuilding of this property created a preconceived need for this side street ingress and egress. Attorney Anderson closed the public hearing stating again, the reasons for this variance that his clients felt it adv'antage6us-again noting the traffic and speed of the traffic on Sunset Drive. ***PUBLIC.HEARING CLOSED*** Moved by Mayor Porter, second by Commissioner Andrews Lantz, the resoldtion denying the variance request be adopted and assigned the next humber by the City Clerk. #11 RESOLUTION NO. 36-86 -60'06 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, DENYING THE REQUEST OF 6341-4UJUIR6►, PETER -GENOVESE, N.D., GENERA L`1ARTNER FOR - Am 0 'At :Vmm VARtANCIE O -PERMIT VEHICULA 0 RESIDENTIAL OFFICE, FROM THE SIDE F-4tKO S RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES AT 6360 'UNSET DR TV E SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA CAI Interim City Attorney Weil read the resolutt an, -,* fi i c I 'can a e; Planning Board recommendati-ons, Into the record f the Planning Board had recommended. Aental. Vice-Mayor McCann stated strong opposition to any access lnf+ t residential neighborhood and explained variances are,to, be gi"n'foi hArd- ships inherent in the land., and this is not the ;as-e. notes,_ I ;nothing in this case that would warrant variance consi'deration and the bullding. design can even be changed If a variance is gTven. Commissioner Andrews Lantz concurred statIng concern 0th the serious traffic problem this could create and urged protection of the residential areas and those homeowners and children who reside there. She would be strongly against any intrusion into the resfdenti.,al neighborhoods. Commissioner Brown said the staff recommendations are importantland should be read. He also noted the building has been built to the maximum °apacity of the lot. Addi-tionally-, RO zoning needs to be clarified and it 4eems, at this p6iAt, to be left up to Interpretati ok of these why giving -it. M y A T T 'r V COMY T C. C-1- Poo- A—U`w! M .. A. N, y I A VAF'IANCE TO -r T C TED FOR -V L--ALLY F: -'ED ik TRA , T :� A AND E, ivr-11ITY GARDENS S 7 ,, -r PUBT T TE-ORDS OF OF THE Fr",E- FLAT BOOK 9 FAGS 3, REC A� F"= �L - DARE COUNTY, FLORIDA, A/K/A 6110 S.W. 68TH STREET, SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AGENDA ITEM PE-89-013 WHEREAS, the Applicant has requested a variance to have a -I(- th staff n r,� a six foot fence is permitted 31 e recommendation is for denial; and WHEREAS, at a public hearing on June 27, 1989, the Planning Board voted 5-2 to deny the request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section I.- That a 'variance to allow a nine foot fence where a six foot fence is permitted on property legally described as: Tracts A and B, University Gardens Subdivision No. 2, as Recorded at Plat Book 93, Page 3, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, A/K/A 6110 S. W. 68th Street, South Miami, Florida. is hereby denied. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of APPROVED: ATTEST: \resolut\89-013 THE CITY Of S ti 6134 SUNSET DRIVE, SCKJTM MIAMI, FLORIDA S310 P'V*L-IC SERVICE DEPARTMEtaT ZONING P 9 T I T 1 ON >0-37 V OL 2 Z 0 N I N P Si I :` I ON (continued) Petition: we, the undersigned property owners, are within 300 feet of the above property. We understand and approve the above request. RTA t t } -t 7 Z O N I N G P E T I T I Q N Property Description, Location and Legal: Request: Petition: Lee Park Apartments, Inc. 6110 S.W. 68th Street Legal: University Gardens Sub No 2 PB 93/3 T. -acts A & B The Owners of the above property; have made the following request Variance from Section 8 -6 -2`.01 of the Zoning ordinance to allow a nine foot fence where only six feet is permitted`. We, the undersigned property owners,< are within foo feet of the above property. We understand and approve the above request. NW DATE ADDRESS 7 L a I tG _ate MCity of South iami INTER- OFFICE MEY!O ANDI.iM Coo _1'di:ly & Zoning Director °°' June 27, 1989 William A. Mackey _IuBjEC .: PB -89 -013 City Planner Applicant: Lee Park Apartments, Inca Request: 'variance from Section 8 -6 -2..01 of the Zoning Ordinance to allow a nine foot fence where six foot is permitted. Location: 6110 S.W. 68 Street BACKGROUNDS The applicant wishes to remove a 3' -0" wrought iron fence from the top of a 31-0" masonry wall, increase the height o€ the masonry wall to 6' -011, and install a 3' -0" chain link fence on top of the increased wall for a total 9' -0" foot overall, heigl tt jence /wall along the 68th Street parking lot closest to 59 Place. The letter of intent includes as hardships: drug transactions, loitering in the inside; of, the wall, maintenance ..expenses from damage and trash by outside users, parking conflicts, theft, vandalism, and again, drug related problems. �IALYSZS The aforementioned 'hardships' which may be a nuisance to the residents of the complex,' and exemplify some of'''the problems of the surrounding area, do not constitute 'hardships' in the current understanding of the City of South Miami Zoning Ordinance, which would include only those hardships associated with the nature of the land and not the social behavior of its occupants and neighbors. a parcel or tract of land it adiately adjacent to such ot, and if the deed or instrument under which such owner acquired title to such lot was of record prior to the ap=plication of any zoning regulations to the premises, or if such lot were created and first recorded in compliance with the zoning regulations in effect on the lot at the time of recording, and if stach lot does not conform to the requirements of such regulations as to the width of Iots and lot area, the provisions of such lot area and lot width regulations shall not prevent the owner of such lot from erecting a single family dwelling or making other impro - ments on the lot, provided such improvemeats,eonform is all other respects to the applicable zoning regulations provi- ded that such platted 'lot is not less than fifty feet is width and has a frontage of at least fifty, foo The term "Platted I ot" as used herein shal l- mean 'a °fit i %tad co o #e separate parcel designated as a lot, parcel, w tract` as part of a subdivision plat recorded in the public record* of Dade County, Florida= 8 -6 FENCES, PALLS AND HEDGES 8 -6 -1 Location All walls and fences may be erected on the rty lino, l--. but shall not extend beyond official rtt -► project on or over abutting property.: n;[ ATkbt Y +r- ,yam,°. tti`'F,#., f 6q• '�i low - s - Fences, walls and hedges nigher than 'sip d. asst abtav* grade are prohib':.ted on or !abutting on ,gropero wed or used for residential purposes. .02 Fences, walls and hedges higher than eight �O feat `` grade are prohibited on property zoned,fe p �cial industrial usa e 4 .� � � �� _ ,.�� � NO 8 -6 -3 Barbed Tire Fences constructed wholly or partially of blAod w1 r'd of prohibited, except that fences ` or walls exceeding six (d') feet in height in an industrial or commercial Aitt r1ot -Oay be topped by an extension of not more than. sixteen ('14) inches in length bearing not more than three (3) strands of barbed wire. The use of electrically charged fences is prohibited in all districts. Revised /27j82 �?�b pi WMO Y,�; ,'✓ ��- ,�ns.N& fir`.: ��'`�€'7- �.,!_ "=",�'� � � 'rt= �. a . a � � j f -- .t w 1 4 f i a � � j f -- .t w 1 �t O tv wires 445 I I CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI ICAT'ON FOR PUBLIC HEARING BE-FORE PLAINNING BOARD (FILE t" DIJP L 4 C-A E) u T H F +iS A�®P!-tCAT:ON mi,.�ST BE COMPLETED AND RETURNED, WITH ALL REQUIRED S PP DATA 70 OFFICE OF TriE OIR E--,oFz z-F-Re PP0CE:ECImGS MAY BE 9 FRTIEO FOR PUBLIC HEARING- AS 1A (CrWmER, TENANT, AGENT, ETC. SPECIFY) LLE PARK APARTMFNTS. TN COOPERATIVE )ORESS OF APPLICANT CITY STATE ZIP ONE 6110 S.W. 68th Street S. Miami Florida 33143 :E(1;05) 665-6221 Wmc* DATE OWNERSHIP OP PROPERTY OBTAINED 7/1/74 �0mrss or OWNER CITY STATE ZIP JPHONE PROPERTY OPTION OR CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE? MORTGAGEE 's NAME AND ADORES* YES No APPLICANT is NOT OWNER, 19 LETTER OF AUTHORITY FROM OWNER ATTACHED? EGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY COVERED BY APPLICATION 3T(S) Northwest block of Co-op--68th Street and 59th PL. BLOCK Jeolvislom Pe `ETES AND BOUNDS ZE OF AREA COVERED BY APPLICATION NAMES ^NO CWFtCIAA- WIDTHS OF ABUTTING PIW'S* -9 ft. DEDICATIONS PROPOSED STRUCTURES LOCATED ON PROPERTY PPLICATION TO THE PLANNING BOARD FOR ACTION ON THE FOLLOWING: CHANGE OF zomi,46 EKer. T om, OTHIER (SPECIFY) XX VARIANCE A164EP40 SECTION OF CODE ;E RENT ZONE - CLASSIFICATION CHANGE or ZONING REQUESTED ?C AIiA LION OF ABOVE 3 ft. addition to existing 6 ft. wall plus 3 ft. chain link fence. :)R OFFICE USE ONLY k H r- A fj7 y L T C OF HEARING NO. K;6 F NO A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, DESIGNATING JOHN M. CORBLISS AS CITY FINANCE DIRECTOR AND AS AN AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY ON ALL BANK ACCOUNTS OF THE CITY EFFECTIVE JUTY 22, 1989. WHEREAS, the City Manager of South Miami, Florida, desires to appoint John X. Corbliss as City Finance Director effective July 222, 1989; and WHEREAS, in order to facilitate proper procedure regarding City fiscal matters, it is deemed i !,he best interests of the CIty of South Miami to designate this individual as a signatory on all bank accounts of the City. NOW,. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYC AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That John M. Corblis.s be and is hereby designated Finance Director and shall 'be an authorized signatory of all bank accounts of the City effective July 22, 1989. Section 2. That Grace L. Ali, former Firiance Director, shall be removed as an authorized signatory effective July 22, 1989. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 1989. APPROVED: rif"91-2 ATTEST: CITY CLERK ------ u A.�'l re 7 "- C ' 655 tN E: ` -a''- - P- r ra c e North Miami Reach, FL 33162 Telenhone- 305/653-3378 (Hcme) 305/953-2873 (Businsss) �)D�-Iocka, 71 --i'la - Finance 7) i r- -- c or 'S,0 ^0 Area of ResDonsibility Direct Ces-nonsibility for all Financial Related Functions, including the following: Investment of City Funds Water, Sewer and Sanitation Rilling and Collection S :duet C-ontrol General Accounting Issuance of Licenses and Permits Purchasing Risk Manaqement Data Processing • Fixed Assets Tnventory Control Collection of all City Funds Have Successfully negotiated two lease purchase agreements for computer equipment, Public.Works vehicles and Police vehicles. December, 1978 December, 1987 City of Flint, Michigan Finance Director 160,000 Populttion., Area of ResDa z "A Direct responsibility for all Financially Related Functions, includinq Federal Grants 06V Xm W "R, -V� Reporting to Fi'na'nce Director: Treasury Division Tncome Tax Division Budget Division General Accounting Division Data Processing Division City and Retiree's Payroll Division Assessor's Division Tnternal Auditing Section Risk Manager 'v7 e S C St; 1,1 1 V - a c c, a n(-. r), i ow i nq B o mi e A,kl N17 DE SC R I PT TYPE 7' 45 '�' 1A ZT1 I � ZE � &'A S 4, 375,1)n Tax Incremen4 Ts -si;ue reneral Obligation for Parking neck 1981 575,On0 Tax Increment Tssue General Obligation for Improvements 1983 9,225,000 Tax Increment Issue General Obligation for Autoworld ProieCt 1984 18,900,000 Tax Increment Issue General Obligation for Festival Market and Buick City IT 1985 20,288,348 Tax Increment Tssue Refunding Bonds, 4or prior Issue Mater Street Pavilion and Buick City 11 1985 47,315,000 Consolidated Tax Anti— General Obligation cipation Notes Series 1985 1986 45,000,000 Consolidated Tax Anti— General Obligation cipation Notes Series 1986 Other areas of responsibility Secretarit �i City Retirement System which currently '',h as- Ass, k sit'd �4 , t1Q 0. 7' 45 '�' 1A ZT1 I � ZE � &'A n, and -- `a s _t r - r ric ome '"at � -:1 ; e � _- -_ n t r ol 0 f ` i c e r general Accounting Data Processing Water & Sewer Rilling & Collections ;larking Collections :)arkinq Vinlation Bureau Nsspssor's office '0,1 rchas i na =rants Monitor F a ve successfully prepared prospectus and sold the following Sond TSSUeS: Y F" JkR &MOUNT DESCRIPTION TYPE 1973 $1,900,000 Street & Bridge Construction Ge,rettl Obligation 1973 435,000 Street Construction Special Assessment General Obligation 1973 2,300r000 Street Construction not, "r" ; hicle Highwav '.'Ve 1973 11150*000 Central ausiness nistrict Goo I e�val obligation 1978 1,500t000 Sewer Treats6at Plant G "-I 0bligation Other areas of responsibility were participation in suer -contract negotiations with three ) ,najo r, industries, within ity limits ami negotiating separate, contracts with the four (4) surVXIftdI.ng townships 7* Z and one city.. Water and Sewer Billing, including accounts receivable, customer history a'nd-'a-ged accounts receivable records. Police §ystem,, parking tickets, warrant issuing, crime analysis by areaj ci-xip—laTnt reporting are only a few of the areas developed. e 11 4 -. n ailfjaer exoence r- :" -2 ^n, related v cu-mulative re )ortinr of budget vers is actual nn,;ition, and _ _ =�, r ?1�JrtS 7ro; _. ,a'tn:� t0 tie aenerdi led a?' . �r:-)nerty Tax Jaluatlon. Sal_ a Ps ratio analysis, ass - ssment roll, tx ro? 1 including cv+npu - erized control of payments and automatic pro - duction of delinquent tax roll. 'Personnel Accounting. Staffing and manning reports. Payroll, in- cluding control of annum. leave, "sick leave, labor distribution, and project charging directly : nto the accounting, system. rM n o y ��. -Z V a - U AsSumel re7- for coor,lination trans Far and cornv­rl- inj office system,; to Data Processing From New York office of the Princeton unit to Connecticut. 4/58 5/60 Burlington Greiqe. Sales Company Supervisor-order Writing, Billing and Shipping Pepartment Converted manual billing operation to intearatel Data Processing System utilizing flexowriter, computy-wer and teletype (including programminq and systems) . The system coordinated oriqinal contract through shipping of material from 11 various plants. Responsible for operation prior, during and after conversion. 5/57 - 4/58 New York Sales Division Budget Clerk 2/55 - 5/57 Assistant manager Central Billing Department -res Dons i ble for 45 employees. 2/54 -2/55 Administration Assistant Responsible for farms control and-design, New York area* 2/52 2/514 Service, I 11/48 -.2/52 Served in various capacities from nail clerk, pricing clerk,, and supervision of legat fhijle '..sections. Birth: 4av 5 , 113 1 status: vA,-;Pj - tw,,, nPiren, Mil;oary Service: 7.9. Marine Cor-s-Spraeant - 2 vears active sprTi :-w� 2/52 - 2/94 Realth - 700d Xztivities and Membersbins! National Accountants Association Municipal Finance officers kssociation Florida Finance Officers Association Elks Lodge Moose Lodge American Legion Knights of Columbus Sports: Sawling, Golf and Huntinq 2-, 01, Q&, Rica, _Q Q .............. - - - - - - - - - - g. D B 1jeE::,- YeMI-g-i's 0-f t-he Co=iSS1011.1. 'Lhe "z5outh Yiamii Arts Festival" occurs every year in "November. 'zince our business thrives on the South Miam4 art 2iarket, we fee' r Se- Ti -.QC- 'III i-n the IN-lovember Festival ices dur ng -i-; o u 1 d a "I d a g r;E -t <v e . _J, jE. n- c- e to the f e s t i v a 1 v Ji s i tors. Our frame shop specialty is thirty minute to one day framing. We feel our services would benefit the general public and the festival itself by enabling those who make purchases to frame their artwork before leaving. What we are asking for is special permission to erect a stationary balloon on our roof for a time period of no more than four days (one day being needed to erect the balloon before the festival starts and another day to take the balloon down after the conclusion of the festival). We hope that you can see in this proposal a means of contributing to the success of the "South Miami Arts Festival"'. Sincer y Yours, 4aci e I la Vuelle Zayden Gr (President) 5910 South Dixie Highway • (Corner of Sunset & Dixie) • Miami, Florida 33143 • Telephone 667-3557 V e a A- of, szt.)um Miami ,C Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida 33143, 667.5691 +CERTIFIED MAIL NOTICE OF VIOLATION Date: J /�I1 File Number : t�`,Y ( �Ct To: � `.'-1 rr � (.:f� �N�;e Address) 64 ILL LEGAL DESCRIPTION: • � -'' �.� " - _ter l �C:.��rY}�r�� . �' r'- CODE SECTION VIOLATED: Section is O�r� name i8- 50d1OT7 DESCRIPTION OF VIOLATION: No person shall engage in or manage the businesses... required to be licensed by the City, without first having paid the amount of license tax requir . TO vat -A -e•r vjo:5 b is fir} cur f 100r, .. _ R QUVIREM NTS !Pit CORRECTION AND TIME LIMN: Y Ve f, . c- r" e ve re o�io_� 001G r6t�. by NEXT INSPECTION DATE: (ra1(p/ YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED TO CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) WITHIN THE TINE LIMIT SPECIFIED. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN CHARGES BEING FILED AGAINST YOU WITH THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA. STATUTE 152.09 AUTHORIZED THAT REPEATED VIOLATIONS COULD RESULT IN AN ASSESSMENT OF A FINE OF UP TO $250.00 A DAY, WITHOUT HEARING, FOR EA TIME HE VIOLA - LATION IS REPEATED. ,� J / cc: ade Enforcement Office B