01-03-89r
4
a
OFFICIAL AGENDA
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
6130 Sunset Drive
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING
January 3RD, 1989
7:30 P.M.
Next Resolution: 1 -89 -7082
Next Ordinance: 1 -89 -1416
Next Commission Meeting: 1/17/89
A. Invocation
B. Pledge of Allegiance to the-Flag of the United States of America
C. items for Commission Consideration
1. Approval of Minutes of the Regular City Commission Meeting of December 20th, 1988
2. City Manager's Report
3. City Attorney's Report
ORDINANCES - SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING:
4. An Ordinance amending Section 5 -14 -2 of Chapter 20 of the Code of Zoning Ordinances
and amending Chapter -13, Article VIII, Section 177000 of the City`s Occupational
` License Code by deleting pawnshops as a specifically permitted use in the City.
(Commissioner Brown)
5. An Ordinance amending Section 13 -2 -2 of Article XIII Chapter 20 of the City Code
f Ordinances by providing that any Zoning Ordinance, variance, amendment to the
omprehensive Land Use Plan or change. in any provision of Chapter 20 of the City's
Zoning Code which results in a le -ss restrictive or liberalized use of property
to require four affirmative votes of the City Commission ;•repealing all Ordinances
or parts of Ordinances in conflict herewith; providing for s'everabili'ty; and
providing an effective date.
(Commissioner McCann)
3/5
3/5
6.
An Ordinance amending Section 12 -3 -4 of Article XII of Chapter 20 of the City's
3/5
Code of Ordinances by providing for;.publication of Notice of Meetings of the City's
Planning Board; for providing posting of the property and notice to property
'
owners within.S,Q..' of any property .for which a Public Hearing is to be held by the
City Commission; providing an effective date.
(Vice -Mayor Schwait)'
RESOLUTIONS
7.
A Resolution denying variances to waive all open space and landscaping requirements',
4/5
to waive all visual buffer requirements; to waive all - weather surface parking
area requirements; to waive parking in front yard prohibition; to waive drainage
requirements; to waive marking of parking spaces requirements; to waive vehicles
to back' -out parking area prohibition; and to waive decorative wall requirements
on property legally described as the West 54 feet of the North 88 feet of the
east 137 feet of the north 1EO feet of the west 112 of the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4
of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4, of Section 25, Township 54 South,'Range 40 East, A(K/A
6230 S.W.''70th Street, South Miami, Florida.
(Planning Board /Adm.)
8.
A Resolution authorizing Legal Counsel to offer the amount of seven thousand five
3/5
-hundred ($7,500.00) dollars as complete settlement of all matters in a tort
liability claim against the City.
(City Attorney)
9.
A Resolution authorizing the City Administration to proceed with: the request of
3/5
Federal Express to construct an out-door kiosk station as a major change to Special
Use Permit No. 65 -82 -4065 granted to the Bakery Centre Site.
(Commissioner McCann)
10.
A Resolution authorizing the City Manager to establish Committees comprised of
3/5
Employees and /or Department Heads to evaluate and make recommendations. in regard
to participation in a Wellness Center Program.
(Commissioner McCann)
�
`
�
REGUALR CITY COMMISSION MEETING
JANUARY 3RD, 1989
Page 2
ORDINANCES - FIRST READING:
None
Administrative Appeal on a decision of the EDVin}D08Dtdl Review and Preservation
UODrU with regard to a UVl|dlDg Facade KeOOVDt7Vn at /UOO S.W. 62nU 8YEOUe'
Dr' Gerald FUrDari t0 address the Commission relative to his variance request
that was Uen1SU at the [1tv C0D0li3SiVD Meeting Of December 20th, 1988.
`
.
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
, .
'
` .
NOTICE l8 HEREWITH GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES THAT IF ANY PERSON SHOULD
DECIDE TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE AT THE FORTHCOMING MEETING FOR WHICH THIS
AGENDA CONSTITUTES NOTICE, SUCH PERSON WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS �
CONDUCTED AT SUCH MEETING AND FOR SUCH PURPOSE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A �
�
VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORDS INCLUDES THE
TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. |
|
'
`
. �
�
'
q
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,
FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 5 -14 -2 OF CHAPTER
20 OF THE CODE OF ZONING ORDINANCES AND
AMENDING CHAPTER 13, ARTICLE VIII, SECTION
177000 OF THE CITY'S OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE
CODE BY DELETING PAWNSHOPS AS A SPECIFICALLY
PERMITTED USE IN THE CITY.
WHEREAS, the City of South Miami currently permits
Pawnshops as a permitted use in the C -3 district of the City; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 13, Article VIII, Section
177000 of the Code of Ordinances provides for a fee schedule for
this occupation; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission deem it in the public
interest that this use be deleted from the City's zoning and
occupational license codes.
-BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY
NOW, THEREFORE,
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. That Section 5 -14-2 of Chapter 20 of the Code
of Ordinances of the City of South Miami is hereby amended by
deleting the following use in the C -3 district:
Section 2. That Section 177000 of Chapter 13, Article
VIII of the Code of Ordinances is hereby deleted:
�7-7-9.9-e
Section 3. Any business which holds an occupational
license pursuant to the above described sections, shall be deemed
a permitted non- conforming use and shall be allowed to operate
this occupation at the license fee in effect immediately prior to
the effective date of this ordinance and as the said fee may be
lawfully amended.
1Z
w
Section 4. That this ordinance take effect immediately
upon its passage.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 198_.
APPROVED:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY
PASSED ON 1st READING:
PASSED ON 2nd READING:
Deletions shown by underlining.
PB -88 -023
Applicant: Mayor and City Commis..sion
Request: Amending Section 5 -14 -2 of Chapter 20 of
the Code of Zoning Ordinances and
amending Chapter 13, Article VIII,
Section 177000 of the City's
Occupational License Code by deleting
pawnshops as a specifically permitted
use in the City.
MOTION: John Andrews moved for approval of the
request.
Neil Carver seconded the motion.
VOTE: Approve: 6 Oppose: 0
D. Approval of Minutes of October 25, 1988
MOTION: John Andrews moved for ;approval of the
minutes.
Neil Carvers seconded the motion.
VOTE: Approve 6 Oppose: 0
ORDINANCE NO. _
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA AMENDING SECTION
13 -2 -2 OF ARTICLE XIII, CHAPTER 20 OF THE CITY CODE
OF ORDINANCES BY PROVIDING THAT ANY ZONING
ORDINANCE, VARIANCE, AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE
LAND USE PLAN OR CHANGE IN ANY PROVISION OF CHAPTER
TWENTY OF THE CITY'S ZONING CODE WHICH RESULTS IN A
LESS RESTRICTIVE OR LIBERALIZED USE OF PROPERTY TO
REQUIRE FOUR AFFIRMATIVE VOTES OF THE CITY
COMMISSION; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF
ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT WHEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission have the duty and
authority to render final decisions regarding zoning and land use
requests pursuant to Section 13 -2 -2 of the City's Code of
Ordinances; and
WHEREAS, the above cited section and prior Ordinances 28-
82- 1151A` should be- integrated and codified An the City's Bode.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY
COMMISSION Or" THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA
Section 1. That Section 13 -2 -2 of Article XIII, Section 20
is hereby ,amended as follows:
13 -2 -2 Decisions
Action taken by the Council Commission under this
Article shall be by a majority vote of those
members present, except in the granting of a
varianceL or a zoning changer an amendment to
the Comprehensive Plan
or
a change in
any
provision of Chapter 20 of
the
City's zoning
code
which would liberalize
or
result in a
less
s
T-
restrictive use of the property, or when a
properly written protest is filed, in which case
a four -fifth (4/5) Four affirmative votes of
Council the Commission shall be required for
approval. Written protests shall be filed with
the Building Division and signed by at least
twenty (20 %) percent of the owners of either the
properties included in the applications or those
properties within five hundred t5'00) feet of the
5 q
proposed change. Any Caumei -l- Commission member
who has a special financial interest, direct or
indirect, in any matter shall make that interest
known and shall abstain from participation
therein in any manner. Willful violation of this
provision shall constitute malfeasance in office
and shall render the action voidable.
Section 2 The provisions of this ordinance shall be
codif ied
Section 3 Should any section or provision of this
ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence or word
be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid,
such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder
thereof as a whole or any part thereof other than the part declared
to be invalid. '
Section 4. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in
conflict herewith are hereby "repealed.
Section 5. This ordinance shall take effect immediately
upon adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this __ day of _ , 1988.
APPROVED
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM
CITY ATTORNEY
Deletions shown by -- - - - - --
Underlining shows additions
s
MAYOR
,® Chij of South MWMI
:� •� ='t,�- PLANNING BOARD
NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING
On Tuesday, October 25, 1988 at 7:30 PM in the City Commission
Chambers, the PLanning Board of the City of South Miami will conduct
a Public Rearing on the following matter:
PB -88 -016
Applicant: Mayor and City Commission
Request: AMENDING SECTION 13 -2 -2 OF ARTICLE %III,
CHAPTER 20 OF THE CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES BY
PROVIDING THAT ANY ZONING ORDINANCE, VARIANCE,
AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR CHANGE
IN ANY PROVISION OF CHAPTER 20 OF THE CITY'S
ZONING CODE WHICH RESULTS IN A LESS RESTRICTIVE
OR LIBERALIZED USE OF PROPERTY TO REQUIRE FOUR
AFFIRMATIVE VOTES OF THE CITY COMMISSION;_
REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES
IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
YOU ARE HEREBY ADVISED THAT IF ANY PERSON DESIRES TO APPEAL ANY OECISION MAOE WITH RESPECT
TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING OR HEARING, SUCH PERSON WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE
PROCEEDINGS, AND FOR SUCH PURPOSE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORO OF THE PRO-
CEEDINGS 15 MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL
IB TO BE BASED. (F. S. z96. 010!)
PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELO IN THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS AT THE CITY HALL, 6130 SUNSET DRIVE, SOUTH
MIAMI* FLORIDA, AT THE TIME AND DATE STATED ABOVE,
ALL INTERESTED PARTIES ARE URGED TO ATTEND, OBJECTIONS OR EXPRESSIONS OF APPROVAL MAY BE MADE
IN PERSON AT THE HEARING OR FILED IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE HEARING. THE BOARD RESERVES THE
RIGHT TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COMM;SSION WHATEVER THE BOARD CONSIDERS IN THE BEST INTEREST FOR
THC AREA INVOLVED. THE SOARC, RECOMME.IDATION ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD aY THE CITY COMMISSION
AT A FUTURE DATE. INTERESTED PARTIES REQUESTING INFORMATION ARC ARE ASKED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THF_
ZONING 0114ECTOR BY CALLING 667 -3691 OR BY WRITING. REFER TO HEARING NUMBER WHEN MAKING
INQUIRY.
PLANNING BOARD
I-S9100 -7 ez REV. IZ -9-91 THIS IS A COURTESY NOTICE
• 0
PB -88 -016
Applicant:
Mayor and City Commission
Request:
AMENDING SECTION 13 -2 -2 OF ARTICLE
XI I I , CHAPTER 20 OF THE CITY CODE
OF ORDINANCES BY PROVIDING THAT
ANY ZONING ORDINANCE, VARIANCE,
AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN OR CHANGE IN ANY PROVISION OF
CHAPTER 20 OF THE CITY'S ZONING
CODE WHICH RESULTS IN A LESS
RESTRICTIVE OR LIBERALIZED USE OF
PROPERTY TO REQUIRE FOUR
AFFIRMATIVE VOTES OF THE CITY
COMMISSION; REPEALING ALL
ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES
IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING
FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
MOTION:
Mr. Andrews moved for approval of
the request.
Mr. Ligammare 'seconded the motion.
Ms. Kraich said she
does not like the thought that two votes
can control the outcome
of a request. She said at the
present moment 3/'2
will pass 'a re-4uest in a zoning change
with the change to
require 4 votes, it would mean that two
Commissioners that
do not agree, would cause a denial. She
said that based on
her perception of the Commissions actions
she does not agree.
VOTE:
Approve: 1 Oppose: 5
Request was denied.
S
M
�D
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,
FLORIDA AMENDING SECTION 12 -3 -4 OF ARTICLE
XII OF CHAPTER 20 OF THE CITY'S CODE OF
ORDINANCES BY PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION OF
NOTICE OF MEETINGS OF THE CITY'S PLANNING
BOARD; FOR PROVIDING POSTING OF THE PROPERTY
AND NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500' OF
ANY PROPERTY FOR WHICH A PUBLIC HEARING IS TO
BE HELD BY THE CITY COMMISSION; PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of South Miami
desires to insure that all residents and affected parties receive
notice of all actions of the City's Planning Board and Commission
decisions regarding zoning changes or variances regarding
property in the City; and
WHEREAS, in order to implement this procedure, the City
Commission wishes to amend the current notice provisions of the
Zoning Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE. MAYOR AND THE CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. That Section 12 -3 -4 of Article XII of Chapter
20 of the City's Zoning Code is amended as follows:
12 -3 -4 Public Hearings and Notices
(a) A Public Hearing shall be held on applications for
all matters upon which a recommendation of the
Planning board is required pursuant to Section 12-
3 of this Ordinance.
Notification of such Public Hearing shall be made
not less than fourteen (14) ten (10) days prior to
any meeting as follows:
1) City Hall Posting.
2) Notice by mail to property owners within 3941
500'.
3) Posting notice of hearing on property.
4) Advertisement in a newspaper of general_
circulation in of the City of South Miami.
Procedures (2), (3) and (4) above shall also apply
to the Public Hearing before the City Commission
regarding the subject property, except as
otherwise provided by State Statute or other laws
of the City.
(b) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained
in (a) above, all City initiated Comprehensive
Land Use Plansr and Plan Amendments arse -4,a-r4
Be�elages�- ®�- �eas�- F�eg�r�as�re shall follow the
public hearing notice requirements of Section
163.3184, Florida Statutes, and as said Section
may be amended.
Section 2. This Ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1988.
APPROVED:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY
sm zoning
Applicant:
Mayor and City Commission
Request: Amending Section 12 -3 -4 of Article XII
• e of Chapter 20 of the City's Code of
Ordinances by providing for publication
of notice of meetings of the City's
Planning Board; for providing posting of
the property and notice to property
owners within 500' of any property for
which a zoning change or variance
request is to be heard by the City
Commission; providing an effective date.
City Attorney Dellagloria stated that anything coming in front of
the Planning Board for Public Hearing would be effected, not just
zoning or variance requests. He said that in the body of the
Zoning Ordinance Section 12 -3 -4 there is no requirement for
zoning or. variance request, it is any item coming against the
Board. Mr. Dellagloria stated that there was concern that the
notice would- notice the public hearing for the Planning Board
Meeting and the Commission Meeting in the same notice. He said
that this amendment does not provide this nor it would be a
recommendation for the Commission.
He said that Planning meetings can be cancelled and items might
have �to come agains the Board again and the Commission meeting
might not come after the Planning Board meeting and
readvertisement might occur. He would conquer the recommendation
and give separate notices.
MOTION :
VOTE:.
i�
Neil Carver moved for approval of the
request subject to recommend acceptance
of the request =to change the staff
report recommendation to read: (all
public hearings);
give separate notification for Planning
Board and Commission hearings and for
the City.
John Andrews seconded the motion.
Approve: 6 Oppose: 0
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, DENYING
VARIANCES TO WAIVE ALL OPEN SPACE AND
LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS; TO WAIVE ALL VISUAL
BUFFER REQUIREMENTS; TO WAIVE ALL- WEATHER
SURFACE PARKING AREA REQUIREMENTS; TO WAIVE
PARKING IN FRONT YARD PROHIBITION; TO WAIVE
DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS; TO WAIVE MARKING OF
PARKING SPACES REQUIREMENTS; TO WAIVE VEHICLES
TO BACK -OUT OF PARKING AREA PROHIBITION; AND
TO WAIVE DECORATIVE WALL REQUIREMENTS ON
PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE WEST 54 FEET
OF THE NORTH 88 FEET OF THE EAST 137 FEET OF
THE NORTH 150 FEET OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SE
1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/49
OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 54 SOUTH, RANGE 140
EAST, A /K /A 6230 S.W. 70TH STREET, SOUTH MIAMI,
FLORIDA.
AGENDA ITEM P
WHEREAS,
A).
B)
C)
D)
B -88 -010
the applicant has requested variances to:
WAIVE ALL OPEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS;
WAIVE ALL VISUAL BUFFER REQUIREMENTS;
WAIVE ALL- WEATHER'SURFACE PARKING AREA REQUIREMENTS;
ALLOW PARKING IN FRONT YARD;
E) WAIVE DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS;
F) WAIVE MARKING OF PARKING SPACES REQUIREMENTS;
G) ALLOW VEHICLES TO BACK -OUT OF PARKING AREA; AND
H), WAIVE DECORATIVE WALL REQUIREMENTS,
and the staff recommendation is for denial of all requests; and
WHEREAS, at a public hearing on December 13, 1988, the
Planning Board voted 6 -0 to deny all the requests.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. That variances to:
A) WAIVE ALL OPEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS;
B) WAIVE ALL VISUAL BUFFER REQUIREMENTS;
C) WAIVE ALL - WEATHER SURFACE - PARKING AREA REQUIREMENTS;
D)
ALLOW
PARKING IN
FRONT YARD;
E)
WAIVE
DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS;
F)
WAIVE
MARKING OF
PARKING SPACES REQUIREMENTS;
G)
ALLOW
VEHICLES TO
BACK -OUT OF PARKING AREA; AND
H)
WAIVE
DECORATIVE
WALL REQUIREMENTS
on property leaglly described as:
The West 54 feet of the North 88 feet of the East 137 feet of
the North 150 feet of the West 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of
the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4, of Section 25, Township 54 South, Range
40 East, A /K /A 6230 S.W. 70th Street, South Miami, Florida.
are hereby denied.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1988.
APPROVED:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY
sm.variance.res
wi
P-
VARIANCE PETITION
Property Description, Location and Legal:
The W. 541 of the N. 881 of the E. 137' of the
N. 150' of the W. 1/2 of the S.E. 1/4, of the
S.E. 1/4 of the S.W. 1/4 of Section 25,
Township 54 S Range 40 E. recorded in the
Public Records of Dade County, Florida, a /k /a
6230 S.W. 70th Street, South Miami, Florida.
Request: The Owners of the above property have made the
following request:
(A) South Miami Ordinance #5- 10 -4.5: waiver
of open space and landscaping
requirements.
(B) South Miami Ordinance #5 -10 -4.06: waiver
of the continuous visual buffer
requirements.
(C) South Miami Ordinance #7 -1: waiver of all
weather surfaced parking area
requirements.
(D) South Miami Ordinance #7 -1 -2.01: waiver
of no parking in front yards requirements.
(E) South Miami Ordinance #7 -2 -3 waiver. of
drainage' of parking areas parking area
requirements.
(F) South Miami.Ordinance #7 -2 -5; waiver of
the marking of parking areas requirements.
(G) South Miami Ordinance #7 -2 -7: waiver of
backing out of the vehicles into public
rights of way prohibition.
(H) (See:`_B-elow)
Petition: We, the undersigned property owners, are within 300
feet of the above property. We understand and approve
the above request.
4
V
V
NAME DATE
�7E
3
ADDRESS
Z ^7 J7 i
(H) South Miami Ordinance 15 -10 -4.10 waiver of front and
rear wall requirements.
ROBERT N. STRICKLAND
101 SARTO AVENUE
CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134
November 21, 1988
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
South Miami, Florida
Re: Variances at 6230 Southwest 70th Street
Gentlemen:
The purpose of this letter is to fulfill the letter of
intent requirement necessary in order to secure several
variances at 6230 Southwest 70th Street,•South Miami,
Florida. The variances being sought are for the following:
(A) South Miami Ordinance #5- 10 -4.5:
waiver of open space and landscaping
requirements.
(B) South Miami Ordinance #5 -10 -4.06
waiver of the continuous visual buffer
requirements.
(C) South -Miami. Ordinance #7 -1:
waiver oV all weather surfaced parking
area requirements.
(D) South Miami Ordinance #7 -1 -2.01:
waiver of -no* parking in front yards
requirements.
(E) South Miami Ordinance #7 -2 -3
waiver of drainage of parking areas
parking area requirements.
(F) South Miami Ordinance #7 -2 -5:
waiver of the marking of parking areas
requirements.
(G) South Miami Ordinance #7 -2 -7:
waiver of backing out of vehicles into
public rights of way prohibition.
(H) South Miami Ordinance #5 -10 -4.10 '
waiver of front and rear wall
requirements
' S
1Y�. ..
-- -- --.rte —
These variances are being requested in order to relieve a
severe hardship on the owner and to preserve the existing
natural beauty of the property. The hardship is that with
the location of the improvements on the property, there is
no where else to park but in the front. A review of the
survey and the property illustrates clearly this situation.
In addition to the hardship, if the variances are not
granted, three beautiful, large native oak trees would
either have to be moved or removed. Unfortunately, these
trees are not a candidate for transplanting, therefore,
removal would be necessary. Furthermore, the grass lawn
would have to be replaces with asphalt which is not an
attractive alternative for this property.
The variance being requested in (H) on the preceding page,
the wall, is needed as there is insufficient space on the
front which is illustrated in the photographs included with
the application. Also, on the rear of the property is a
parkway which would make a wall impossible.
It is the applicant's intention to keep as much of the
current landscape and to add to it in order to beautify this
property. The granting of these variances will permit the
applicant to accomplish this goal.
Thank you for your consideration of this application.
Sincerely,
Robert N. Strickla
RNS:eh ;
enclosure
S.W. 70 th. STREET
— — P.L. 54'00
N
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
28'0' PARKWAY
0
i
P.L. 54'0' -.
f
CAK n
i
4
CK
jo,
7W
i
°
I
cc
v
— — P.L. 54'00
N
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
a • 7 s �,s r In
«rV«- a. •Mn
a m a y LOG,&.T 10 N KFTjN
an m r z a M. tYJs
3 v D m z tn
w 0 0 10 0 • .+
r a' t` R 0 ..
7 Z m 0 0' y 0 Z:
A •7 -1 IA • Z rt
ti-L
0 o xs�
It
o J, 04 0
41 CPO,
O t%
Q fn 7 ti' � 1
CN � �� n o r- t 1 �'•
i 7C 0 • C 0 _ M
S '6 t 0 +
' 3 a µ 7 v S
R
70 • O �' r
_
7 o na
0 -•"
• C O 0
O O C R
r
fA �• : �^
t5l $ =$ Z Q g a r >E a • « 4
u10 7w
{►
t t4
0 4w No
V •• r
0 11
g �• • � ///. .sir
.CASIn Link Fence
W•.
v
25.00'
twrt �
�
21.39'
w 1y
1
1
31.00'
ML
e
3
8
37.00'
CD
35.01' to
25.31' :
1
i
rz
2555.00Y
1
63.00'
o
0
a
�i
a • 7 s �,s r In
«rV«- a. •Mn
a m a y LOG,&.T 10 N KFTjN
an m r z a M. tYJs
3 v D m z tn
w 0 0 10 0 • .+
r a' t` R 0 ..
7 Z m 0 0' y 0 Z:
A •7 -1 IA • Z rt
ti-L
0 o xs�
It
o J, 04 0
41 CPO,
O t%
Q fn 7 ti' � 1
CN � �� n o r- t 1 �'•
i 7C 0 • C 0 _ M
S '6 t 0 +
' 3 a µ 7 v S
R
70 • O �' r
_
7 o na
0 -•"
• C O 0
O O C R
r
fA �• : �^
t5l $ =$ Z Q g a r >E a • « 4
u10 7w
{►
t t4
0 4w No
V •• r
0 11
g �• • � ///. .sir
S" 12 PH 12: 00 8 8 R _"2 2 4 0 8 E
a •APR .
J040 r; 2542 WARRANTY DEED
./
THIS INDENTURE, made this ' day. of April,. 19$8,
between ROBERT A. HENDRICKS and LYNNE B. HENDRICKS, his wife of
the County of Dade, State of Florida, grantors and ROBERT N.
STRICKLAND, whose post office address is 101 Sarto Avenue
Coral Gables, Florida 33134 , of the County of
Dade, State of Florida, grantee,
WITNESSETH, that said grantors for and in consideration
of the sum of TEN AND N01100 ($10.00) DOLLARS, and other good
and valuable considerations to said grantors in hand paid by
said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, have
granted, bargained and sold to the said grantee, and grantee's
heirs and assigns forever, the following described land,
situate, lying and being in Dade County, Florida, to -wit:
The West 54 feet, of the North 88 feet
of the East 137 f eet of the North 150
feet of the West 1/2 of the Southeast
1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the
Southwest 1/4 of Section 25, Township
54 South, Range 40 East, lying and
being in 'Dade County, Florida.
SUBJECT TO: Easements, restrictions,
limitations of record, taxes for the
year 1988 and subsequent years. F.nd a
Purchase Money Mortgage, of even date herewith.
and said grantors do hereby fully warrant the title to said
land, and will defend the same against. the lawful claims of all =
persons whomsoever. ,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grantors have hereunto set
their hand and seal the day and year first above written.
Signed, sealed and delivered
in our presence:
ROBERT A. HEN R C S
LYNNkA. HENDRICKS
STATE OF FLORIDA )
)SS:
COUNTY OF DADE )
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day before me, an officer
duly qualified to take acknowledgments, personally appeared
ROBERT A. HENDRICKS and LYNNE B. HENDRICKS, his wife to me
known to be the persons described in and who executed the
foregoing instrument and acknowledged before me that they exe-
cuted the same.
WITNESS my hand and official seal,-in the County :,.aod...
State last aforesaid this day of April, 1988. -�•'` Et:E >
NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF - .)L " c 1; i
AT GE J
RECORDED to OFTICIAL RECORDS ODOR J
6i DALE COUNTY, noR10A, r
My commission expires: ,V AG VERWIED
notary PtAft. Strlse d flaWa atL�r� n:;:Yi1�;2D P. BRINBE$ i
MY Cjxri t Eq*es J&maq te, 190 CIUK CIRCUIT COuRl
Bonded tt1ry.11fa'pwd BWft ACV" 7
D,-curaenary S - Cci-iccted $ °+� 4
This instrument prepared by: $_ SURTAX D". Stamp!; C-- ----�: - -__..I
ROBERT A. HENDRICKS, Esq. C ; ?ss ••� °� !,: .,
Hendricks & Hendricks i�r.��51 Tax Collected S�
310 Alhambra Circle sy p• rir�ftEr, Gterk, j a �� �tY, Fhb
Coral Gables, FL 33134 i
s a rt 8 '�'� .,tom ago
'� ca �� - 6•Z� i �p Q . � so+
t . L 9331 •
33 72
lz
it
AA
zxol
• /1 ' s° mss' 1► Q�'� y » t ,r - °�rO � - -
v
t
_
I r 1
i4 i 5 i
/3 ' h1
o czgo' s 4
3
7101 ' _ .0 ---- -- - � i�o• -
9 -
I10 `2
719
ro 7tz1 ;; 35
31c.
25 ,
4 a
2:31 X59-
. s � •
air ,fir' ,v�' : •
I:
P
DRI SUNS T t/ ;
r
APPLICANT ROBIW/
ow NE R : ���RT � 7741�kL.A1VD
MAP ` REFERENCE: �I T r G i`1 141Y% /"•
CUMENTS : 8 b�YR>I"Cr5
CITY ov MUT4 AIAMI PLANNING bokRD
Compass
r .000/
Scale.. I.t
Date.. IL 2 5_JBA&
Drn ..5.x.7.. Chk .....
Hearing No....
Memo, PB -88 -010 -2 December 13, 1988
BACKGROUND
on May 10, 1988, the Planning Board recommended approval and on
July 19, 1988, the City Commission approved rezoning of the
subject property from Medium Density Multi- Family Residence
(RM -24) to Residential Office (R0) District. (Ord.18 -88 -1302)
The Applicant wishes to occupy the existing single family
residence for a real estate office use and as he wishes to have
changes that do not comply with the zoning regulations, he is
requesting 8 variances.
ANALYSIS
The Zoning Regulations' and the rational for each requested
variance are:
1. (5 -10 -4.05) Open space shall be provided on each lot equal to
at least thirty (30) percent of the total lot area; said space
shall be unencumbered by structures or off - street parking spaces,
and shall be landscaped and well maintained with grass, trees,
and shrubbery. At least one tree shall be provided for every 400
square feet of landscaped open space. At least 50% of said trees
shall be. 12 -14 feet, tall at the time of planting, and the
remainder of the trees•shall be at least 10 -12 feet tall at 'the
time of planting, and 'shall comply with the requirements of
Article XV "Vehicular Use Area Landscaping" in all other
respects. A sprinkler system shall be installed to' ensure proper
maintenance of the landscaped areas.
Due to the small size of this parcel, the above ordinance can not
be followed.
2. (5- 10 -4.06) In addition to the requirements of .05 (preceding)
a continuous visual buffer shall be provided wherever an RO use
abuts or faces directly (within 50 feet) a property zoned for'"
single family residential purposes. To accomplish this the
normally required perimeter landscaped buffer shall be increased
from five (5) to eight (8) feet in width and trees from T_ able -
RO -2 (attached hereto at the end of this section) shall be
planted according to the spacing listed. These trees shall be a
minimum of 10 -12 feet tall immediately after planting..,.
The Applicant is requesting to have the off - street parking in
front of the house and entire frontage be used as an entrance and
exit for the parking. This approach does not allow any landscaped.
buffer in front of the property.
3. (7 -1) An off - street parking space defined as an all- weather
surfaced area, not in a street or alley, permanently reserved
' .. - -
_ _
;.teats• •ice ? _ -
/ -! •
' sue, s .� - .
Kemo, PB -88 -010 -3- December 13, 1988
for the temporary storage of one (1) automobile, and connected
with a street or alley by an all - weather surfaced driveway
whichaffords vehicular access without requiring another
automobile to be moved.
The Applicant is requesting to park automobile in an existing
grass area instead of paving it for off- street parking use, in
addition South Florida Building Code does not allow handicapped
parking in grass area*-
4. (7 -1 -2.01) In the RO District, parking shall not be allowed
in the front yard.
Because of the location of the existing building the parking
space can only be located in front yard.
5. (7 -2 -3) Off- street parking areas shall be drained to prevent
damage to abutting properties, streets and alleys and surfaced
with erosion resistant material in accordance with applicable
City specifications.
The Applicant does not want to provide the required drainage,
which is not allowed in the South Florida Building Code.
6. (7 -2 -5) Off- street parking areas shall be marked by painted
lines, curbs or other means to indicate individual spaces. Signs
or markers shall be used as necessary to insure efficient traffic
operation of the lot.
Since the applicant wishes to havegrass area instead of paving', -
marking would be difficult if not impossible.
7. (7 -2 -7) Entrances and exits shall not be located where they,'
might create undue traffic problems. Landscaping, curbing or
approved barriers shall be provided along lot boundaries to
control the entrance and exit of vehicles or pedestrians. All
egress and ingress to off - street parking areas shall be so
_ designated as to prohibit backing out of vehicles into public
rights -of -way.
The applicant is dedicating 25' to the City and the proposed
egress and ingress to the parking spaces is not adequate.
8. (5 -10 -4.10) A decorative wall of masonry, reinforced
concrete, precast concrete or other like material that will be
compatible with the main structure, five (5) feet in height shall
be erected alon interior property lines, including the ,:rear
property line; provided, however, that in the event that the rear
property line abuts a secondary road, said wall shall be set in
ten -(10) feet from the official, right -of -way of the secondary
road, and said ten (10) feet 'shall be landscaped; provided,
further, in the event that the interior side; property line abuts
the same or liberal zoning district, the requirement for the wall
along, said common interior property line shall not apply. Walls
m
4
n.
Y
.i
4M �?
t
' 1 fs�+a •��. � �;� sir
J
m
4
n.
Y
.i
4M �?
t
Memo, PB -88 -010 -4-
December 13, 1988
within or extending into the required 25 foot front setback area
shall be no more than four (4) feet
in height.
Further, individual buildings shall
not be connected by fences,
walls, breezeways or any other
structures which make the
buildings appear to have a single-
facade more than eighty (80)
feet in width, provided that buildings may be connected by a
breezeway at the first level of no
more than eight (8) feet in
width.
Applicant can not have any decorative
wall along the front and
back property line.
RE CO MMEN DAT1 ON
Staff recommends denial of all the
requests based on the reasons
stated in the analysis section.
T} %`
_ '
City of South Miami
INTER— OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Marien Aran - Spinrad DATE: November 25, 1988
To: Director, Building, Zoning
and Community Development
FROM; Soheila Goudarzi SUBJECT: Staff Report
Planner'C�m,, PB -88 -022
General
Applicant: Mayor and Commission
Requests AMENDING SECTION 12 -3 -4 OF ARTICLE XI I OF
CHAPTER 20 OF THE CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCES BY
PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF MEETINGS
OF THE CITY'S PLANNING BOARD; FOR PROVIDING
POSTING OF THE PROPERTY AND NOTICE TO PROPERTY
OWNERS WITHIN 500' OF ANY PROPERTY FOR WHICH A
ZONING CHANGE OR VARIANCE REQUEST IS TO BE HEARD
BY THE CITY COMMISSION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
Background .
To notify the public for any matter upon which a recommendation
of the Planning Board is required, four procedures have been
taken:'
1 Posting the City Hall.
2. Notice by mail to property owners within 300 feet.
3. Posting of Notice of Hearing on property.
4. Advertising in a newspaper of general circulation in the
City of South Miami.
Proceduree(1) &(4) above have been applied to the Public Hearing
before the City Commission.
The Mayor and Commission want procedures (2) and (3) above be
applied to the Public Hearing before the City Commission -too.
Analysis
In this regard the City has an option to notify the public for
both meetings (Planning Board, City Commission) at the same time
or separately.
Recommendation
",*-I
Staff Report PB -88 -022 MEMO, November 25, 1988
Page 2 of 2
Staff recommends approval of the request condition to:
1 The process of posting the property and notifying
property owners within 500' should apply to all
public hearings not only zoning and variance
requests.
The request may read:
AMENDING SECTION 12 -3 -4 OF ARTICLE XII OF CHAPTER 20 OF
THE CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCES BY PROVIDING FOR
PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF MEETINGS OF THE CITY'S PLANNING
BOARD; FOR PROVIDING POSTING OF THE PROPERTY AND NOTICE
TO PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500' OF ANY PROPERTY FOR WHICH
A Z(3# 6 Ejj*N-CE 6-& V A D E PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST IS TO
BE HEARD BY THE CITY COMMISSION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
2. The City should notify the Public for the meetings
separately.
3. Since the City "volves more expenses for any Public
Hearing, additional _fee should be required.
t
1
DRAFT
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING BOARD
City Commission Chambers
Tuesday, December 13, 1988
7:30 PM
Presiding`: Thomas Cooper, Chairman
Secretary: Shaleen Pinero
A. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Cooper at 7 :31 PM
and was followed by the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of
the United States of America.
B. Roll Call.
Present (Constituting a quorum) Absent
John Andrews Bruce 'Hoffmann
Neil Carver
Thomas Cooper, Chairman
Manuel Gutierrez
Susan Kraich
Larry Ligammare
Also in attendance were Soheila Goudarzi, Planner and City
Attorney John Dellagloria.
C. Public Hearing.
PB -88 -010
Applicant: Robert N. Strickland
Request #1: Variance from Section 5- 10 -4.5 to waive
the open space and landscaping
requirement.
Request #2: Variance from Section 5 -10 -4.06 to waive
the continuous visual buffer
requirement.
Request #3: Variance from Section 7 -1 to waive all -
weather surfaced parking area
requirement.
Request #4: Variance from Section 7 -1 -2.01 to waive
no parking in front yards requirement.
Request #5: Variance from Section 7 -2 -3 to waive the
drainage requirement of parking areas.
-1-
Request #6: Variance from Section 7 -2 -5 to waive the
marking of parking area requirement.
Request #7: Variance from Section 7 -2 -7 to waive no
backing out of vehicles into public .
right of way requirements.
Request #8: Variance from Section 5 -10 -4.10 to waive
decorative wall requirement.
Location: 6230 S.W. 70 Street
Legal Description: The West 54 feet of the North 88 feet of
the East 137 feet of the North 150 feet
of the West 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the SE
1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4, lying
and being in Section 25, Township 54
South, Range 40 East, of the Public
Records of Dade County, Florida.
Mr. Robert Black, Attorney representing Mr. Strickland, signed in
and addressed the Board. He presented photographs of the subject
property. He said they want to keep the character of the
property in the same fashion that it is now with grass lawn and
three large oak trees and to do this they must ask for these
variances. They don't want to tear the trees and lawn and replace
it with paving. They don't want to make this :more of an eye -sore
than it would be'a benefit. He said the variance foriback,ing out
of vehicles into public right of way is very misleading. He had
a survey done and it revealed that there was a 25' park way on
the side from the end of the property line to the street and
there would be plenty of room for backing out.
Mr. Black said that for the remaining request, the existing
building is set up in a way that would need no 'additional
parking in the front. He said that the whole purpose of these
variances were to keep the residential office nature of the site.
Mr. Carver asked Mr. Black if when the property was rezoned was
there any discussion concerning the use of the property and
parking.
Mr. Strickland said it was rezoned 5 -1 and he needed to comply
with the RO zoning regulation.
Mr. Black said that the Board said they had to deal first with
the rezoning and later deal with the variances.
-2-
e
Mr. Ligammare asked Mr. Strickland what type of traffic will he
have and how may people would work in the office.
Mr. Strickland said it will be used as a small Real Estate office
and the amount of people would probably be 4 or 5.
Ms. Kraich asked staff how many parking spaces would be required.
Staff stated that 5 spaces is required for the property.
Mr. Carver asked Mr. Strickland if the property was up for sale.
Mr. Strickland stated he has the property for sale since he
purchased it, he bought it with the intended to use it or sell
it.
Mr. Gutierrez asked staff what were the houses adjacent to this
property zoned as. Staff stated that the North side is RS-3, the
South is RM -24 and the immediate East and West are RM -24.
Mr. Strickland presented to the Board with photographs of the
door hitting the rear side of the property. Furthermore he stated
that the request to put a Concrete Block fence on the rear of
property would be impossible. He said he checked with Larkin
Hospital and they said they own the fence and would not cooperate
with him.
Mr. Carver asked staff if the decorative wall is put on one side
does it have to be placed along all sides of the property. Staff
stated it must be all around the side of the property.
Mr: Black said that the parking variance is the one that `make the
rest fall it to place, without this one the request- would'not be
needed.
Mr. L'igammare'asked Mr'. Strickland what would happen if it rains
and would create a big mud hole and there is 4 or 5 cars parked
there.
Mr. Strickland said with the grass there, it won't be a, problem.
Mr. Ligammare said that with traffic the cars would run across
the lawn and tear it up. Mr. Ligammare said then it would look
worse then the lawn across the street looks after substantial
traffic and a heavy rain pour. Mr. Black said if in fact that
were to happen, there are ways to avoid and alleviate this
problem by gravelling the tire area and this does not mean that
you have to pave it.
Mr. Carver said that this was not what Mr. Strickland has
requested and he thinks it requires some engineering, design and
planning. To say that this is a way to prevent it and to actually
do it are two totally different things. If he suggesting a
solution there might be another alternative and the variances are
not needed.
7
Mr. Carver said he understands that they are ways of resolving
the problems but there hasn't been one presented. He feels that
this will become an eye -sore from parking on the grass. He says
that the appearance would become terrible with traffic coming in.
Mr. Strickland stated that the property has been this way for
years and has not become a problem. Mr. Carver said he understand
and he thinks it looks attractive the way it is, but when it is
converted the grass and traffic will make it look terrible. That
is why the regulation are stricker for business zone, to prevent
these things from happening.
Mr. Black said they have a hardship because they can only park in
the front and the rest of the variances fall into place after
this is granted.
Mr. Gutierrez stated that Mr. Strickland knew that even though he
was in a Residential zone that did not mean he had the same
privelages as a Commercial zone and he was aware of this at the
time of the rezoning and there would be requirements to meet.
At this time the public hearing was opened.
Mr. David Landowne, signed in an addressed the Board. He said he
lives at 6926 S.W. 62 Ct. right next to the property that Mr.
Strickland considered as a dog house and presented photographs.
He stated that there are residences in the neighborhood. He said
that he likes living in the neighborhood and they enjoy the City
of pleasant living and he w -ould. like the City to do everything
:possible;to keep it that way. He would not like to see the
property used as a office.-
Ms. Kraich stated that the Board is not present tonight to debate
-the use of the property, which has been granted as RO. She asked
Mr. Landowne, how does he view the issue of allowing the four or
five cars to park on just a grass lot. She said does he sees it
as furthering the goal of appearing residential. He said it 'would
not like to see four or five cars parked.
Mr. Fred Burns, representing the Day Care Centex next to the
property, signed in and addressed the Board. He stated that there
were several questioned asked by the Board that maybe he could
answer. Mr. Burns said that Mr. Carver previously asked wether
the property was for sane. Mr. Burns stated that earlier in the
morning he went to see the property and an agent of Century 21
said that the property had been sold. Mr. Burns said that Mr.
Gutierrez had asked about the history of RO zoning and _what were
the people anticipating. Mr. Burns stated that Mr. Strickland
went before the Board that he was going to use it as a Real
Estate office and talk about a low - intensive type of use. The
City has felt that the whole entire area should be RO to
discourage other types of business from making it in a different
zone so they used this tactics.
MOTION : Neil Carver moved for denial on
the eight requests.
John Andrew seconded the motion.
VOTE: Approve: 6 Oppose: 0
R
.t
T
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH
MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING LEGAL
COUNSEL TO OFFER THE AMOUNT OF SEVEN
THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED ($7,500.00)
DOLLARS AS COMPLETE SETTLEMENT OF
ALL MATTERS IN A TORT LIABILITY
CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY.
WHEREAS, the City is presently in litigation regarding a tort
liability claim in the matter of Guidi v. City of South Miami; and
WHEREAS, the City's Insurance Counsel recommends the
settlement of all claims in this matter.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. That the Mayor and City Commission hereby
authorize insurance counsel to offer the amount of Seven Thousand
Five Hundred ($7,500.00) Dollars to settle all matters in the. tort
liability claim of Juan and Maria Guidi against the City in the
9
Case No. 88 -25515 in Dade County Circuit Court.
Section 2. That the funds for the settlement shall be
expended from Account No. 1420 -9100 entitled: Self Insurance
Fund.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of ,1988.
APPROVED:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY
jeffestl.res
RESOLUTION NO. - 175-88-70-76-k
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY
COMMISSION AUTHORIZING THE CITY
ADMINISTRATION TO PROCEED WITH THE
REQUEST OF FEDERAL EXPRESS TO
CONSTRUCT AN OUT-DOOR KIOSK STATION
AS A MAJOR CHANGE TO SPECIAL USE
PERMIT NO. 65-82-4065 GRANTED TO THE
BAKERY CENTER SITE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to special use permit Resolution No. 65-82 -
4065, the Bakery Center site was permitted to build a P.U.D. in
the City; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 16-7-3 of Chapter 20 of the
Zoning Code, a request for a change in the final plans has been
received by the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to
proceed with the request of Federal Express to construct an out-
door Kiosk on the Bakery Center site as.a major change to the
P.U.D. granted pursuant to the above-described special use Permit
Resolution.
Section 2. That this Resolution amends and repeals
Resolution 175-88-7076.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 1988.
APPROVED:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY
sm.fedexpre.res
.A*ft
RESOLUTION NO.
T
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ESTABLISH
COMMITTEES COMPRISED OF EMPLOYEES AND /OR
DEPARTMENT HEADS TO EVALUATE AND MAKE
RECOMMENDATIONS IN REGARD TO PARTICIPATION IN
A WELLNESS CENTER PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission have considered the
participation of employees in the City in wellness center programs
to help employees' health and job- related functions; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission desire input from the
employees before final consideration of implementation of this
program.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to
establish employee and /or department head committees in' regard to
consider programs; standards and other recommendations in relation
to a wellness center program for. the City.
Section 2. That all committee recommendations shall be
reported to the City Commission by April 5, 1988.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 01988.
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
READ AND APPROVED AS TO FQRM:
CITY ATTORNEY .
sm.cityman5.res
02
APPROVED:
MAYOR
q
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, DENYING AN ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL
FROM A DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND
PRESERVATION BOARD REGARDING A FACADE FOR A BUILDING
LOCATED AT 7000 S.W. 62ND AVE.
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review and Preservation Board
(E.R.P.B.) has approved a request for facade renovation at 7000
S.W. 62nd Ave. -at their meeting of December 20, 1988; and
WHEREAS, the Adminstration wishes to appeal the decision to
the City Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1_ That-the appeal of the Administration from the
decision of the E.R.P.B. regarding the facade renovation is hereby
denied.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of ,1988.
APPROVED:
ATTEST:
MAYOR
CITY CLERK
READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY
sm environl.res
Y City of South Miami
INTER—OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Rosemary Nayman DATE: December 27, 1988
To: City Clerk
Marien Aran- Spinrad ,
FROM: Director, Building, Zoning susjEcT:
and Community Development
Please be advised that I have been instructed, at the City
Commission meeting of Tuesday December 20th, 1988, to file an
administrative appeal to the decision of the Environmental Review
and Preservation Board at their meeting of Tuesday, December 20,
1988 regarding agenda item K, file number EB -88 -161, the facade
renovation for the building located at 7000 S.W. 62 Avenue and
represented by Albert Socol of Modulor Architecture.
If you have any questions on this matter, please feel free to
call me by December 30, 1988.
MAS /sp
cc: William Hampton, City Manager
,John Dellagloria, City Atto -rney
r
s CDR. GERALD D. FURNARI OP' ME' ISTS DR. ROBERT L. LOFTON
December 27, 1988
To Whom It May Concern:
I request an appearance before the City Council of South Miami
at their next regular meeting.
I would like to discuss the variance that was denied at the
December 20th meeting.
Sincerely,
Gerald D. Furnari
GDF /mm
948 NORTH KROME.AVENUE • HOMESTEAD, FLORIDA 33030. 247 -2331
Pernar K os