Loading...
08-19-978'9:itiifi':,:k)'f1:3f.'•93:: #S MAYOR: Anna M. Price, Ph.D. VICE MAYOR: Julio Robaina COMMISSIONER: COMMISSIONER: COMMISSIONER: Armando Oliveros, Jr. David D. Bethel R. Paul Young, Ed.D. CITY COMMISSION AGENDA Regular City Commission Meeting Meeting date: August 19, 1997 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, FL Next Regular Meeting date: September 2, 1997 Phone: (305) 663 -6340 Time: 7:30 PM PURSUANT TO FLA STATUTES 286.0105, "THE CITY HEREBY ADVISES THE PUBLIC THAT IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THIS BOARD, AGENCY OR COMMISSION WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT ITS MEETING OR HEARING, HE OR SHE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, AND THAT FOR SUCH PURPOSE, AFFECTED PERSON MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. THIS NOTICE DOES NOT CONSTITUTES CONSENT BY THE CITY FOR THE INTRODUCTION OR ADMISSION OR OTHERWISE INADMISSIBLE OR IRREVELANT EVIDENCE, NOR DOES ST AUTHORIZE CHALLENGES OR APPEALS NOT OTHERWISE ALLOWED BY LAW. City of South Miami Ordinance No. 6 -86 -1251 requires all persons appearing in a paid or remunerated representative capacity before the City Staff, Boards, Committees and the City Commission, to fill out the appropriate form and file it with the City Clerk prior to engaging in lobbying activities. CALL TO ORDER: A. Invocation: B. Pledge of Allegiance: C. Presentations: There are none ITEMS FOR THE COMMISSION'S CONSIDERATION: 1. Approval of Minutes: Regular City Commission Minutes - July 29, 1997 2. City Manager's Report: 3. City Attorney's Report: REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 1 AGENDA'.- AUGUST 19, 1997 CONSENT AGENDA 4. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW & PRESERVATION BOARD; APPOINTING MRS. BETTY BANKS TO SERVE FOR A TWO YEAR TERM ENDING AUGUST 19, 1999 OR UNTIL A SUCCESSOR IS DULY APPOINTED AND QUALIFIED. (Mayor Price) 3/5 5. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE PLANNING BOARD; APPOINTING MS. PATRICIA A. CHIMELIS TO SERVE FOR A TWO YEAR TERM ENDING AUGUST 19, 1999 OR UNTIL A SUCCESSOR IS DULY APPOINTED AND QUALIFIED. (Mayor Price) 3/5 6. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO DISBURSE THE SUM OF $3,327.15 TO MARTINO TIRES, INC. FOR THE PURCHASE OF 15 TRUCK TIRES AND INNER TUBES AND CHARGING THE DISBURSEMENT TO ACCOUNT NO. 1760 - 519 -5250, "MOTOR POOL DIVISION-TIRES- (Administration/Public Works) 3/5 7. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO DISBURSE THE SUM OF $2,264.00 TO TURF MANAGEMENT RELATING TO CUTTING, LEVELING, AND HAULING AWAY ALL DEBRIS FROM SIX OVERGROWN VACANT LOTS IN THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI AND CHARGING THE DISBURSEMENT TO ACCOUNT NUMBER 001- 0000 -341 -9040 "CODE ENFORCEMENT FINES" (Administration) 8. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO BOOKS FOR AFTER SCHOOL HOUSE PROGRAM, AUTHORIZING PAYMENT TO THE WRITE GROUP, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,540.00, WITH DISBURSEMENT PAID FROM ACCOUNT #001- 0000 - 219- 30 -00, "ESCROW ACCOUNT, AFTER SCHOOL HOUSE" (Administration) 3/5 REGULAR CITY COMMISSION AGENDA - AUGUST 19, 1997 2 9. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO CONSULTANT FEES, AUTHORIZING PAYMENT TO CORZO, CASTELLA, CARBELLO, THOMPSON & SALMAN IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,620.00 WITH DISBURSEMENT PAID FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 001 - 369 -920. (Administration) 3/5 10. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO DISBURSE THE SUM OF $1,925.00 FOR THE REPAIR OF POLICE VEHICLE NO. 94 -02 AND CHARGING THE DISBURSEMENT TO ACCOUNT NO. 04- 1500 -4680, "SELF INSURANCE FUND" (Administration /Public Works) 3/5 11. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE APPROVAL OF CONSULTING LEGAL ATTORNEY FEES IN THE AMOUNT OF $484.73 CHARGED TO ACCOUNT NO. 1500 - 3410. (Administration) 3/5 12. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE APPROVAL OF CONSULTING LEGAL ATTORNEY FEES IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,401.92 CHARGED TO ACCOUNT NO. 1500 -3410. (Administration) 3/5 13. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF FOOTBALL EQUIPMENT AND UNIFORMS FOR A TOTAL PRICE NOT TO EXCEED $19,715.00 BY THE RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PROVIDING FOR DISBURSEMENT FROM RECREATION DEPARTMENT ACCOUNT NUMBER 2000 - 5630 "FOOTBALL" (Administration /Parks & Rec.) 3/5 REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 3 AGENDA - AUGUST 19, 1997 ORDINANCE(S) SECOND READING & PUBLIC HEARING(S) 14. AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, APPROVING AMENDMENT 96- 2ER TO THE ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT THE RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED IN THE EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR); PROVIDING FOR RE- NUMBERING AND /OR COMBINATION OF PARTS OF THIS ORDINANCE WITH OTHER SECTIONS OR PARTS OF SECTIONS OF THE SOUTH MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (1st Reading - January 2, 1997) (Administration /BZ &CD) 3/5 RESOLUTION(S) PUBLIC HEARING There are none RESOLUTION(S) 15. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT TO CONTINUE THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION WITH METRO DADE COUNTY ON THE RENEWAL OF THE "COMMUNITY SPACE LEASE AGREEMENT ", WHICH LEASES SPACE TO THE SOUTH MIAMI SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER FOR THE 1997 -98 YEAR. (Administration /Parks & Rec.) 4/5 16. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO INSTRUCTIONS TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATION TO NEGOTIATE AMORTIZATION OF TWO OF THE FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS REQUIRED BY THE SHOPS AT SUNSET PLACE DEVELOPERS, WHEREBY MONEYS COLLECTED SHALL BE PLACED IN AN INTEREST- BEARING TRUST FUNDS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE HOMETOWN DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (Administration /BZ &CD) 3/5 ORDINANCE(S) FIRST READING There are none PUBLIC REMARKS COMMISSION REMARKS REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 4 AGENDA - AUGUST 19, 1997 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Nldmnand Commission �IlcbG� From: L. Dennis Whitt City Manager Date: August 13, 1997 Agenda Item # Subject: Comm. Mtg. 8/19/97 ERPB Appointment This resolution is placed on the agenda by Mayor Anna Price, and recommends Ms. Betty Banks for appointment to the Environmental Review and Preservation Board for a two year term. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW & PRESERVATION BOARD; APPOINTING MRS. BETTY BANKS TO SERVE FOR A TWO YEAR TERM ENDING AUGUST 19, 1999 OR UNTIL A SUCCESSOR IS DULY APPOINTED AND QUALIFIED. WHEREAS, The Mayor and Commission recognize the important contributions made by those who serve on the various city boards and committees, and wish to appoint a full complement to each of the active boards and committees; WHEREAS, the city Commission desires to appoint Mrs. Betty Banks to serve on the Environmental Review & Preservation Board until August 19, 1999 or until a successor is duly appointed and qualified. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The City Commission hereby appoints Mrs. Betty Banks to serve on the Environmental Review & Preservation Board. Section 2. The expiration date of this appointment shall expire August 19, 1999 or until a successor is duly appointed and qualified. Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon approval. PASSED AND ADOPTED this ATTEST: CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY day of APPROVED: .i.i�. , 1997. INTER- OFFICE MEMORANDUM CITY CLERK'S OFFICE TO: Honorable City DATE: 8/8//97 Commission I FROM: Ronetta Taylor City Clerk IRE: Board Appointments As per Mayor Price's request I am forwarding the attached resume /board application to you for your advice and consent. Mayor Price will be sponsoring resolutions to appoint the following individuals: 11. Ms. Patricia A. Chimelis to the Planning Board; and I2. Mrs. Betty Banks to the Environmental Review & Preservation Board. IC: Earl G. Gallop, City Attorney L. Dennis Whitt, City Manager r v CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, FL 33143 Ph (305) 663 -6340 Fax (305) 663 -6348 CITY BOARD /COMMITTEE APPLICATION 1. Name (please print) 2. Home Address 3. Business 4. Business Address 5. Home Phone l 1,; ! 14 6. Educational Background 7. Community Services 8. 9. 10. Are you a registered voter? Are you a resident of the City? Do you have a /business in the City? Signatur Yes y No Yeses ' No Yes No_; Date / RESUMES WILL REMAIN ON FILE FOR ONE YEAR CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and Commission F ALL. is Whitt City Manager Date: August 13, 1997 Agenda Item # Subject: Comm. Mtg. 8/19/97 Planning Board Appointment This resolution is placed on the agenda by Mayor Anna Price, and recommends Ms. Patricia Chimelis for appointment to the Planning and Zoning Board for a two year term. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE PLANNING BOARD; APPOINTING MS. PATRICIA A. CHIMELIS TO SERVE FOR A TWO YEAR TERM ENDING AUGUST 19, 1999 OR UNTIL A SUCCESSOR IS DULY APPOINTED AND QUALIFIED. WHEREAS, The Mayor and Commission recognize the important contributions made by those who serve on the various city boards and committees, and wish to appoint a full complement to each of the active boards and committees; WHEREAS, the city Commission desires to appoint Ms. Patricia A. Chimelis to serve on the Planning Board until August 19, 1999 or until a successor is duly appointed and qualified. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The City Commission hereby appoints Ms. Patricia A. Chimelis to serve on the Planning Board. Section 2. The expiration date of this appointment shall expire August 19, 1999 or until a successor is duly appointed and qualified. Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon approval. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1997. ATTEST: CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED: 17)__ V • E D rx #&S6�zidsrti���. INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM CITY CLERK'S OFFICE TO: Honorable City DATE: 8/8//97 Commission FROM: Ronetta Taylor City Clerk IRE: Board Appointments As per Mayor Price's request I am forwarding the attached resume /board application to you for your advice and consent. Mayor Price will be sponsoring resolutions to appoint the following individuals: 1. Ms. Patricia A. Chimelis to the Planning Board; and 2. Mrs. Betty Banks to the Environmental Review & Preservation Board. IC: Earl G. Gallop, City Attorney L. Dennis Whitt, City Manager _ AT"CIA A. CHIMELIS 6396 Manor Lane, Apt. 4 South Miami, FL 33143 EDUCATION University of Miami, School of Business, Coral Gables, Florida Major: International Finance and Marketing Degree: Bachelor of Business Administration, December 1983 Honors: Cum Laude Beta Gama Sigma Honor Society Phi Kappa Phi Honor Society Golden Key Honor Society PROFESSIONAL LICENSE(S): Florida Licensed Real Estate Salesman - 1984 - 1986 Florida Licensed Real Estate Broker - 1986 to Present EXPERIENCE BERKOWITZ DEVELOPMENT GROUP, Miami, Florida (Commercial Real Estate Owner /Developer) Vice President (October 1993 - Present) Responsible for management of a commercial real estate development firm that currently owns and manages in excess of 1,000,000 sq. ft. of retail shopping center properties in Dade County, with an additional 500,000 sq. ft. in various stages of development at this time. Primary responsibilities: coordination and preparation of all documentation relative to property acquisition, due diligence, legal, environmental, financing and construction. Supervise all administrative officers (Comptroller and Property Manager) as well as support staff members. LEFMARK Florida, Inc., Miami, Florida (Commercial Real Estate Owner /Developer) Executive Vice President (1991 - 1993) Primary responsibilities: acquisition analysis of new properties; preparation and negotiation of lease proposals and leases; design, organization and preparation of sales and mortgage financing memoranda and supervision of day -to -day office operations. URBAN REALTY GROUP, INC., Miami, Florida (Commercial Real Estate Leasing, Management & Financing Agent) President, Sole Owner and Licensed Real Estate Broker (1988 - 1992) Specialized in providing commercial developers, national retailers and private investors with professional services relating to all aspects of commercial property acquisition, development, management and leasing. Responsibilities included property analysis, negotiation and preparation of leases, preparation of leasing brochures and term sheets, design and preparation of mortgage financing and property sales memoranda including financial projections (Lotus 1,2,3 /Excel/Quattro Pro), thoroughly researching property information, and performing due diligence reviews. Management and accounting services were also provided to various RTC controlled properties. 91 GRAND BAY REALTY, INC., Miami, Florida (A Joint Venture between Equitable Real Estate & The Continental Companies - Hotel & Office Building Developers/Managers) Executive Vice President (1984 - 1987) Responsible for marketing and leasing commercial office space at the Grand Bay Plaza Office Building (165,000 Sq. Ft.) in Coconut Grove, Florida, as well as preparation of loan memoranda and negotiation of mortgage refinancing for several existing hotel properties owned by The Continental Companies. REFERENCES Jose A. Bolanos, Esq. Bolanos, Truxton & Young 2121 Ponce de Leon Boulevard Suite 600 Coral Gables, FL 33134 (305) 567 -0424 Robert L. Shapiro (Developer) Chief Operating Officer & Director of Development LEFMARK Florida, Inc. 848 Brickell Avenue Suite 1120 Miami, FL 33131 (305) 577 -3366 W. Thomas Duncan (Mortgage Broker) President - Chief Operating Officer Aztec Group, Inc. 2665 S. Bayshore Drive PH -2A Coconut Grove, FL 33133 (305) 854 -5000 Robin Bosco Robin Bosco /Architects & Planners, Inc. 2937 S.W. 27th Avenue Suite 207 Coconut Grove, FL 33133 (305) 442 -2345 Jeffrey L. Berkowitz (Developer) President Berkowitz Development Group 2665 S. Bayshore Drive Suite 1200 Coconut Grove, FL 33133 (305) 854 -2800 Marc A. Milgram (R.E. Broker & Retail Leasing Specialist) Florida Shopping Center Group 5201 Blue Lagoon Drive Suite 550 Miami, FL 33126 (305) 262 -8877 Brian L. Bilzin, Esq. Rubin Baum Levin Constant Friedman & Bilzin 2500 First Union Financial Center 200 S. Biscayne Boulevard Miami, FL 33131 (305) 374 -7580 3 Wool' CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI INTER- OFFICE MEMORANDUM T Mayor and Cogaqiission FROM: L. Dennis Whitt FIT- City Manager DATE: August 19, 1997 SUBJECT: Agenda Item # (0 Commission Meeting August 19, 1997 Approval of purchase of 15 truck tires and inner tubes to re -stock inventory The attached resolution seeks approval of a $3,327.15 expenditure to purchase 15 truck tires. The tires are required to re -stock the Motor Pool Shop's inventory. The tire inventory is a very important component of the City's safety oriented maintenance operation. Therefore, it needs to be re- stocked on a timely basis. The vendor listed in the resolution is on Metropolitan Dade County bid no. GS97- 40553. Funding for this expenditure is included in the current fiscal year's Public Works budget. I recommend approval of the tires purchase. Attachments 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO DISBURSE THE SUM OF $3,327.15 TO MARTINO TIRES, INC. FOR THE PURCHASE OF 15 TRUCK TIRES AND INNER TUBES AND CHARGING THE DISBURSEMENT TO ACCOUNT NO. 1760 - 519- 5250, "MOTOR POOL DIVISION - TIRES ". WHEREAS, replacement of truck tires is a necessary fleet maintenance activity and a critical component of the City's safety oriented field operations, and; WHEREAS, restocking of tires is carried out periodically in order to avoid a situation where a vehicle is not operational due to lack of tires, and; WHEREAS, funding for tire purchases has been included in the current fiscal year's budget. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The Public Works Department has obtained competitive prices Martino Tire, Inc., a vendor on contract with Metropolitan Dade County through Bid No. GS97- 40553. Section 2. The City Manager be, and is hereby authorized to disburse the sum of $3,327.15 to Martino Tire, Inc. Section 3. That this resolution shall be effective immediately and after adoption hereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 1997. ATTEST: READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM City Attorney APPROVED: MAYOR R .......................... ......................... .......................... CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Mavor and city Commission Date: August 13, 1997 -"Y'Oee,�j� Agenda Item # From: L. Dennis Whitt Re: Commission Meeting 8/19/97 Lot Clearance The attached resolution seeks approval for $2, 264.00 expenditure relating to cutting, leveling, and hauling away all debris from six overgrown vacant lots in the City of South Miami. The Finance Department obtained three quotes and contracted the services of the lowest bidder, Turf Management. I recommend approval. I RESOLUTION NO. 2 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF 4 SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO DISBURSE 5 THE SUM OF $2,264.00 TO TURF MANAGEMENT RELATING TO CUTTING, 6 LEVELING, AND HAULING AWAY ALL DEBRIS FROM SIX OVERGROWN 7 VACANT LOTS IN THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI AND CHARGING THE 8 DISBURSEMENT TO ACCOUNT NUMBER 001 - 0000 - 341 -9040 "CODE 9 ENFORCEMENT FINES ". 10 11 WHEREAS, the City of South Miami Code Enforcement Division issued 12 notices of violations to property owners and posted six overgrown vacant 13 lots; and 14 15 WHEREAS, the City of South Miami contracted the services of Turf 16 Management for cutting, leveling and hauling away all debris at six 17 overgrown vacant lots; and 18 19 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF 20 THE CITY OF,SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: 21 22 Section 1. The Finance Department obtained the following 23 competitive price quotations: 24 25 Trimm Lawns 26 Turf Management 27 Joey's Tree Service 28 29 Section 2. The Finance Department contracted the services of the 30 lowest bidder, Turf Management; and 31 32 Section 3. The City Manager be, and is hereby authorized to 33 disburse the sum of $2,264.00 to Turf Management for services rendered. 34 35 Section 3. This resolution will be effective upon passage. 36 37 PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 1997. 38 39 ATTEST: APPROVED: 40 41 42 43 CITY CLERK MAYOR 44 45 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: 46 47 48 49 CITY ATTORNEY in TURF MANAGEMENT COMPREHENSIVE GROUNDS MAINTENANCE • TEL. 255 -7000 12600 S.W. 125 AVENUE FAX 255 -1281 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33186 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI CENTRAL SERVICES DIVISION 6130 SUNSET DRIVE SOUTH MIAMI FL 33143 EFERENCE TERMS Code; CSMI Ol 0/ His Date: 01/18/91 Inv. No.: 26053 Due Date: 08/02/91 Page No.: 2 YOUR # S. 6411 SW 59 PLACE jjj"`,, «z, 3q • = ? ?,3q 100.00 6. 6415 SW 59 PLACE ` w act s. 01:.39 100.00 TRANSPORTATION CHARGE TO S DADE LANDFILL f0 _ 85.00 e TIPPING FEE /S DADE LANDFILL (SEE � � 329.00�\� ENCLOSED INVOICE) ,' M ° �j ZCo ba A Sueeertiae is Landscaping Tire! PLEASE REMIT WITH PINK COPY OF INVOICE. SUB TOTAL TAX TOTAL NET TO PAY 2264.00 0.00 2264.00 2164.00 I �URF MANAGEMENT COMPREHENSIVE GROUNDS MAINTENANCE TEL. 255 -7000 12600 S.W. 125 AVENUE FAX 255 -1281 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33186 REFERENCE Code; CSMI CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI CENTRAL SERVICES DIVISION 6130 SUNSET DRIVE SOUTH MIAMI FL 33143 " INVOICE Date: 07/18/97 Inv. No.: 26053 Due Date: 08/02/97 Page No.: 1 TERMS 0/ 0/ HIS k OUR A REP 7/16 MOW, EDGE, WEEDEAT /SAWBLADE, BLOW a OFF SIDEWALKS /ROADWAY CURBS, ACCUMULATE _ AND DISPOSE OF DEBRIS AT THE FOLLOWING: 1. 6400 SW 57 COURT (ALSO INCLUDES ,i%s$.�J0 = 83,9Q 375.00 REMOVAL/LEVELING OF DIRT /DEBRIS MOUND ON PROPERTY). _ 2. 6583 SW 59 COURT (ALSO INCLUDES .s8 �, 3 _ /pG,3 475.00 REMOVAL/LEVELING OF DIRT /DEBRIS MOUND ON PROPERTY). 3. 5942 SW 62 STREET .?./s%75 200.00 4. 6530 SW 60 AVENUE 7-34-2/' = 600.00 SUB TOTAL ' TAX TOTAL NET TO PAY 4 I N O ����zC m ��� ip�r�#k siT. I � N M G - t•�- t- t- t-�r�C l � N l iii Ul it it it it it it D z 170 Z D rp �0 fu CO Ui _9 tY� W i` C l C C a > 1A � 'S 0 O4 l m ,� l m r 1+ Ln < 13 v m m I m R fD I � � -�'o lb m ( 1p Sf7, tp LA +fi rt tt G7 iC G i1• CD -4 t ► w W 4- 1 x►Ma 96 0 'SIG 6) CA G 0 - -a i ► w .� r u► Cc •.i i I —{ E0 I r V, ► !Z m ul) m ► r� I N i I " i C -WL I3Noff ibUOVSNVUI, m Q D m o� v Z 3 ul wy-k n CO) NO0 as In O P' m In f to W O� O Of � m O O r D Z m 0 z r D wi It 96/12/1997 04:19 30566772,06 0 CITY OF SO MIA PURCH 7 JR; RAGE 93 'AaE ai VR� MAVE� e, IT,,F OF Pfjs� FURS MIAMI, FLORIDA 923 331867£ r�Q/ MIAMI, F4 33186 KEASE ptovIrIC TWS O'FFiCi WITti A QVOTF. PF.R VACANT PROPERTY BASZD ON THt FOLLOWItNG SPEC', THANK Y ®v. LOT CLOA rC 3MC� 6400 SW 57 CT $ 400.00 6503 SW 59 CT $ 500.00 5942 SW 62 ST $ 300.00 6082 SW 63 ST $ 500.00 5928 SW 66 ST $ 500-00 6580 SW 60 AVE 4 600.00 6413, SW 59 PL 300.00 6415 SW 59 PI, S 300,00 THESE PRICES INCLUOt THE CUTTING OF THE GRASS, COCTNC, OF SIDEVALKS XND WZFD ZN11ING AROUND FXNCES PALMS AND TREES. THERE WILL BE THE USS OF ROUND -UP AROUND FRNCES. THIS WILL ALSO INCLUDE TO BRING ALL DEORIS LIKE TTRESo CANS RTC TO THE CURB TO BE PICKED UP BY TOE TRUCKS OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI. SHOULD YOU HAVZ ANY F13PTHER QUESTIONS PJEASt CONTACT US. CORDIALLY MANUEL I. VALLE Page I P.O. Box 653260. U►►m flor a 33265, ToloPh" 13061223,2221 k ki 0 CITY OF S0 MIA PORCH PAGE 1:1 PlRll� DPOSAL Wt' Flcreby attbRrit tppe�larnrtnna m...r v..� -- -- o.6- s' . .. .... ... ..._ .., _._. E PRO" tt gableyable as�foldvwa,. surd. ot:. . - dollars ($ 1. nrrtanal tB "ranteed ro be as apesraed. All work to be cornpkt,4 to a worltmanilke mariner ndtng to standard ptanroea. Any alteration - deviation rmm atlow spoclfkatlona trnolvtrt4 a "Data wQt be --uted only upon written od Authorized above, the cattraata All CU and kljl carne an extra charge oars signature.. contras- owner to ca +�grarnenta eonttngenr upon at '"U acxlderris or ddays beyond Rm. tornado. and other - eeeasaf Inatrrana. OW workers are ft NOTE' 1lira r@ red by Workmen" CoRlpenastl0n insurance. Y P Po*d tttap be Withdrawn by uti If not acoePted w•tthlu ��'AtVCE Qir FROP(3t�AL — The rtQ2a, �daya' p sPecililed. o and mnditt0 8 are sati ills ry and are hereby acectated. You are au the work ato- sect Iliad. Nyrnettt will be Made as otrtltated above. AturG Date glggture to do we ieo4 (305) 6s6.2()44 . ........... . ....... a furnish rraterial and labor, complete In accordance With ffixeswespecifl I-n,,- 8�ifl IlItIO . 17 for the sutra Of dollarn i8 1. ne"ll to guarantied to bC 86 MWWd AD work to be COM*Wd 10 & WO31 W"Ike lnr,-.r ,rdirig to 1IWWWlJ P"WUM& A. It Yal"erl or deviation fro. kbol qxll�jfjem ab— the eAlthate. AD agm, upon canton *V*M IM tons tnvwvlfw Authol r,l win Wmm an attrg OW S104ture control. Owner to carry f1m. Wnaft. Mill 'Apo" Strikes Ct-V kuld (Abu ft��Smry i , 20cl*nts Or delsp bq* rcd nd b)* W**rftn'$ CO"Venel inau'rW". "c"W W*rl are rt* NOM'Th's ROPOW 1W by MthdluWn thtn --days. by us 1I "ted VA attire Detle. 0; M". Cwul LAI 7 9 PROPOSR hereby to furnish material and labor compute in accordance with these speetftcation», for the sutra of, . dollars 1® �. yabir as foiipwa: natertai to guaMteai to be as apecitud. AM worse to be computed an a wtm lima dike eranmr Authorized to wmftm6 pnrtttm Any mdwratton or deviation tram ab6w specmacsuons Invviving Authorize a coats wtii be executed only mapon written orderw and WO beew me an extra charge over abhor the eKinate. All agreements contingent upon atrikee< aml4eata or delays beyond control owner to carry ilea, tornado, and other ne VMIy uwuranM. Qm jj woetcemw air UY Mme: This proposal may be withdrawn red by worknwn s Compensation Incur krxe. by us It not agoeptett within days MPTANCe Ohm' PROPOSAL -- The prices. apect[lcations and conditions are eatlafaetory and are hereby accepwd. You are authorized to do the wont as speci.t)ed. Payment will be made as outlined above. aturc Date -- -- StPture Thiele We hereby attbmtt aSSe�C1l3t�ifena a.,.i .n•e we.. aatrrlal N guaranteed y be a. 4P-14 M- AD watt to be rnmpkud to a ttorkuurttike rttarencr ardlntt to standard praCtkes, Any altcMtlon or deviation from abp .yp�111aitiong t+rvyll9tt j �u[h0[ IaC(► a CData will be -Wuted Only upon written Orders, and wltl controAt�r tc. r4PJ +tBeaenttats contlntnt upon atritm r�tkn s or etw�e °�cr Signature tarty n", tornado, and other dAdays beyond I" as K"orittnen i Compernaatl0n lnounwm '} liuturarlae. $ w0+tcem are tally NOTE. This ppppc*W ATW be wltbdrawtt = �`t'e1HCL QF PROP(>�l, „ Tht pr1C�s. tiY ua rf not �� wlthttt —�--` Qa ys. the work �apeclflc�atiarta artd mndltloe�l are eatlsfactary and are her>rbY acetpied. You are auehorirtd to tia spcctftad. FaYn�nt wad.! be tstatlr as acttdlned above. aturt �� Slgpature tmeral Is guaattteed to be as %w dPled, AU woric to be tom*ted to a wprkmif 0kc manner Authorized cding to *tamftid precticca atrey obtrauon or deviation from above speb0cations Invott�tng Auth at ze tbal* will tee executed onty upon written otdtrt. and Waal beconte M extra charge over jb(AV the e*timatt. MI agreements conilr4ent upon m4hes. accident* or delays beyond � : This proposal � withdrawn vntrol. Owner to arty hie. tornado, and other rwct wry Insurance. Cho wuriatta are fully ea by rvorknien s Compensation tnsurance- by us if not accepted within days - :F.PTAHCE 4B PRi?8�ClSAI. -- The Pities apeetteatiotur deli conditions are estta$fat tort' deli ttf+t hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the wink as speciftcd. Payment will be made as outlined above. ALUM - Date Signature Date - f 06!12x`1337 04:19 3056677616 _t_� Lace ;, - - -- .,, w��•••,a.rruns anti esnrtaaaee fbr. .......... 'ayable as foak; SUM Of... - daftm (s 1 r»arerral to gUltraotted to be A% aitecilled. AU Wtttk to be ooanpkted In a "or k+rtaNtkt cotdtng to Atendard PFACU �, An aiteratton or work to a frond A ttutaner rrt Cost$ wilt be "ecule�d only uppn wtatteq " rik uon* rnvolverrg /uttho" d A above the "U" Ate. All orders, And whk eetrotnt an txtta charge over Sigrtgtteer `T r control. Ownet to Ce agtto"04a and other upoat Strikes, aceidenta or doUp brio" vexed by Work"wn" Co tsm tornado, tuna other ntcem -ty. taliunux*. ur workers arc NOTE; This ptrt+artiM 1naUtancx: � �Y Ptdjloelp) t[i5ty be Wlehdtawtt �CEPTr�N by us of not serepted within Ca or PROP(tBAi, ,. Fhc paces. �—�° dar' sPfffeattotu9 aril eoradittens Sat satisfactory and art heat the Work as Specified. Payment Will be trade as outlined 'above. aocepted. Yatt are at ,nature Attie Stg mtuae and estimates Wt heirby at bmit apectitmtiorra and estimate. >.,._ :5 t WE PROPWE t layabie as foiiowa: p U tnaXRnat Is gmuntsed to bs as apecene 0, Alt work to be completed to a Worktnatdfks manna raaardtnK Fo stsngatti Pcactitea Any alsrratlon or deviation from above sptrinctittona tnvolvt Auth�aiaed Ira mate vnll be a »eeuud only utroft wrttaen orders and -0 bee" a an extra am* .. Slgnatum !Q abovir the esltmua ly e$�exmenu mntir*111 upon strikes. oou&rsts or de%" b �r control. C1a�ner is carry firs. tornado. and other ruoesaary Insuroom, Ouj�+prrtrrtra ab tufty 1yD'CE: This vexed by Workmen s Cotnpentatton tawram�e PrOP34W nmy be withdrawn by uti If not aaaepW4 within � days CCEP &J%Ivuz OF PROPOSAL — The prices. specifications and conditions arse satisfacto and sire hertb a the worst as specified. Payment will be made as outitned above. � meted Yau are authoti Qilatuat± �� i-- st�ttuar Date IVA CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI v INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and Commission om: City Manager Date: August 13, 1997 Agenda Item # 00 Subject: Comm. Mtg. 8/19/97 Books - After School House This resolution authorizes the purchase of books for the After School House Program. The After School House has been selected by Miami Dade Community College to participate in the America Reads Challenge program. The program requires a series of approved books. Ms. Harrell, the After School House Director has provided a list of those books, and prices from three companies which could provide the series of books. The Write Group provided the lowest price. The funds for this purchase will be paid from the After School House Escrow Account, #001- 0000- 219- 30 -00. This account is funded through donations from individuals and community organizations. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO BOOKS FOR AFTER SCHOOL HOUSE PROGRAM, AUTHORIZING PAYMENT TO THE WRITE GROUP, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,540.00, WITH DISBURSEMENT PAID FROM ACCOUNT # 001- 0000 - 219- 30 -00, "ESCROW ACCOUNT, AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM." WHEREAS, the Director of the After School House selected for participation the America Reads Challenge program, and attended a training sponsored by Miami -Dade Community College; and WHEREAS, the Director of the After School House has requested approval to participate in the program, which requires purchase of specific books to be read by the children; and WHEREAS, administration believes this program will benefit the children participating in the After School House Program; and WHEREAS, the After School House has a community donation fund for purchase of books with sufficient balance for this expenditure; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The City Commission hereby authorizes the City Manager to disburse payment to The Write Group in the amount not to exceed $1,540.00 for purchase of books as needed for the reading program for the After School House, from account # 001 -0000- 219- 30 -00, "ESCROW ACCOUNT, AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM." Section 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon approval. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1997. ATTEST: CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY V1 I 300 N.E. Second Avenue Miami, Florida 33132 -2297 (305) 237 -340+ FAX: (315) 237 -3109 VO Miami -Dade COMMUNITY COLLEGE District Administration June 11, 1997 Daisy Harrell Volunteer Coordinator After - School House 6125 SW 68th ST Miami, FL 33143 Dear Ms. Harrell: Eduardo J. Padr6n, Ph.D. Disb7ct President I am pleased to itiforin you that Ms. Carol H. Rasco, Senior Advisor to the Secretary of the United States Department of Education and Director for the America Reads Challenge will be visiting Miami -Dade Community College on Thursday evening June 19, 1997. As you know, the America Reads Challenge is a new initiative announced by President Clinton to ensure that all children can read independently by the end of the third grade. The educational institutions in Dade County (higher education and K -12 schools) are actively responding to this challenge. Participating institutions include Miami -Dade Community College, the University of Miami, Florida International University, Barry University and Dade County Public Schools. In addition to these institutions, a number of community agencies which provide literacy and tutoring programs for children are also involved. You are cordially invited to join us at the Wolfson Campus of Miami -Dade Community College (300 N.E. 2nd Avenue) on Thursday, June 19,1997 in Room 3314 for a Round Table meeting with Ms. Rasco. The "At the Table" session will include a focus on the America Reads Challenge and provide an opportunity for you to convey your thoughts and/or ideas regarding education. This is an opportunity to provide the Department of Education with feedback regarding important educational issues facing us today. The meeting will begin promptly at 6:00 p.m. and conclude at 7:15 p.m. The discussion will be followed by a light reception. If you are unable to attend please feel free to designate someone to represent you. Please call Dr. Robert Exley at 237 -7027 to confirm your attendance. Thank yo-ti for your support for - in So,rth Florida and I hope to see you Thursday evening. Respectfully, Eduardo J. Padron America Reads College and University Presidents Steering Committee F:\ USERS \ROBERTE\PERSONAL\AMREADS \RAS VISIT\AD VLETT. W PD tir- ar —oa -7 � rK.t s a :2a �SYf.:NE:fi�, +.iJ�F f h1EM0RANDUM TO: Selected Elementary Principals 2372553 F.02 FROM: Nereida I. Santa -Cruz, Assistant Superintendent Educational Services !L /dray 69 1997 NSC 1996.97 #164 995 -2367 SUWECT: Mi?CC -DCPS 200 AMERICA READS READING TUTORS Are you interested in obtaining trainers reading tutors who will work 15 -20 hours a week and be provided at no cost to your school? For example, receiving five tutors would translate into almost' e 100 hours a week, 3,000 hours a year, and a value of over $24,000 to your school (Cd? We need approximately 40 schools to participate in this innovative and exciting initiative that is in response to President Mton's America Reads Challengp and the Presidential Summit on volunteerism. This program is the product of a partnership between DCPS and Miami -Dade Community College and will result in 200 M -DCC students being trained as treading tutors and placed with interested schools beginning this September. The majority of these students will be education majors, honor students, and students who have completed service - learning projects. These student tutors will be part of the Federal Work Study program and will be placed as tiding tutors with students in Ist- and/or 2nd grade. In order for your school to participate in the America Reads program and receive these tutors, we ask that you review the following information: Requirements for participation: 1. A.Wgn a contact person (administrator or lead teacher) who will assist the M -DCC Program Managers with coordlmdon. and Implementation of the tutoring project at your school. This person must attend a meeting on June 5, 1997, from 2:00 p.m. - 3:00 pm!., at Miami Dade Community College, Wolfson Campus, Room 3208 -Bldg. 3. 2. Agree to follow the MDCC -DCPS Tutoring model, and provide supervision and on -going support to the tutors assigned to your school. 3. Identify two primary -grade (1st and/or 2nd grade) teachers who will represent the grade level. 4. Send identified contact person (administrator or lead teacher) and the two identified primary teachers, who will be working directly with the tutors, to the orientation session to be held in late August, 1997. In order to participate, please complete the attached form. 'This form must be submitted to Norma Bossard by May 17, 1997. You will be notified by May 25, 1997 if your school is selected for this project. At this tune a Miami Dade Community College, Wolfson Campus map will be enclosed. NSC /aa Attachment cc; Dr. John Johnson Mr. Joseph K. Mathos Dr. Marilyn 7. Neff Mr. Eddie T. Pearson Mr. Russell W. Wheatley Region Superintendents Ms. Terri Kanov Reynolds Region Directors for Instructional Support District Directors for Educational Services Ms. Norma B. Bossard R1 DADE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS COMMUNITY AGENCY AMERICA READS ORIENTATION June 5, 1997 M -DCC Wolfson Campus Working Together To Help Children Read Well And Independently .Dade County Responds to the President's Call To Action Project Timeline June - August • Recruit & select tutors • Prepare tutor curriculum materials & training strategies • Complete teacher & agency training Project Timeline • ..- -ira ■Oct. 6th -10th - -- continuing tutor training (reflection) sessions ■Nov. 10th -14th - -- continuing tutor training (reflection) sessions Volt • How were the schools selected? • What is expected from each school? principal? reading specialist? teacher? • Who will supervise the tutors regarding their time sheets, etc.? • Which children will receive tutoring? • What curriculum will the tutors use? • How will we mesh a college student's schedule with the school's needs? • How will the program be assessed / evaluated? 0 3 Project Timeline September ■ 1st -13th - -- tutors receive training, orientation, and assignments ■ 16th -19th - -- tutors begin work at schools ■22nd - 30th - -- second training cycle Project Timeline 91=1 MIA ■ Recognition ! Celebration ■Assessment of first term and planning for next term How were the schools selected? ■ Non Success for All schools ■ Reading scores below 40th percentile ■ Pool of 68 schools ■Quality vs Quantity ■Distributed geographically a Student will be expected to spend 15 -20 hours a week tutoring reading in a K -3rd grade setting at an approved America Reads community site. Student selection criteria: 1. Enroll for at least 6 credit hours at M -DCC 2. Demonstrate financial need by completing an Application for Federal Student Aid 3. Be in good academic standing with a minimum GPA of 2.0 4. Attend two pre- service orientation/training sessions 5. Be responsible, be willing to learn, and have a desire to help children improve their reading Student employees will be expected to. 1. Attend two mandatory (3 -4 hour) pre - service orientation/training sessions. No student will be placed without attending both of these sessions. 2. Choose an approved America Reads placement site from list provided by the M -DCC Center for Community Improvement and Civic Literacy. 3. Complete the "America Reads Placement Confirmation "form with your agency supervisor and return it to the M -DCC Center. 4. Meet all requirements of the host agency, including paperwork, dress code, standards of conduct, and attendance policies. 5. Abide by all M -DCC employment policies (see attached). 6 Notify your agency supervisor well in advance if you are unable to go to work. You are expected to make these hours up at a later time. You must notify the M- DCC Center immediately if your status changes (i.e., if you stop working, etc). 7. Attend two in- service training and reflection sessions per term. These sessions are mandatory. Students who do not participate will be dropped from the program. 8. Notify your supervisor if you have any problems or concerns, and check in with your assigned mentor (either an M -DCC reading instructor, or a DCPS reading specialist) when necessary. 9. Maintain a daily time sheet, including securing supervisor's validation of hours worked, and turn in hour log to the M -DCC Center prior to the bi- weekly deadline. If you do not turn the sheet in by the deadline, you will not be paid on time. 10. Complete bi- weekly and end-of-term evaluations and return them to the M -DCC Center with your hour logs. Aft LIKE HELPING PEOPLE? WANT TO HELP CHILDREN IMPR O VE THEIR READING? M -DCC WILL BE HIRING 150 STUDENTS THIS SEPTEMBER TO SERVE AS READING TUTORS WITH CHILDREN 10 - 20 HOURS A WEEK - -- $6.00 /HOUR PLACEMENTS ALL OVER DADE COUNTY TRAINING & ON -GOING SUPPORT PROVIDED Requirements: ► Enroll for at least 6 credit hours at M -DCC ► Demonstrate financial need by completing an Application for Federal Student Aid ► Be responsible, be willing to learn, and have a desire to help children improve their reading! Call the Service - Learning Center (237 -0859) or the District Office of Student Financial Assistance (237 -0646) for more information! Miami -Dade COMMUNITY COLLEGE America Reads Program Development Questionnaire (Please complete this and leave it with us before you leave) 1. What concerns do you have about the America Reads program? 2. What suggestions do you have to make the program as successful as . possible? 3. Is there a non - classroom based position available at your school that could be used for the reading coordinator? Possible number of First Grade classes Reading Coordinator: (Title 1, Reading Specialist, Reading Leader without classroom responsibilities, etc.) Name: School: Phone: Position: Mail Code: Fax: 0 G co O L a C O W a� c» A a 0 a� a� A N U «i w S 08. RJ sz C a� %O a^r cl cV A ¢' wU O C o •r•° C 0 v bA C, IZ H G co O L a C O W a� c» A a 0 a� a� A N U «i w S 08. RJ sz C %O a^r cl cV o b10 wU C'ri ci o G co O L a C O W a� c» A a 0 a� a� A N Lesson Plan Sample from Guidelines for Volunteer Tutors of Emergent and Early Readers. (1995) F. Johnston, C. Juel and M. Invernizzi. McGuffey Reading Center, University of Virginia. ................................................................. ............................... .................................................................. ............................... ................................................................. ............................... Emergent Reader P Rereading Familiar Material Word Study Word Bank 1. Read word cards 2. Record known words 3. Match unknown words to book 4. Review old words Phonics 1. Picture or Word Sorting 2. Writing what was just sorted Writing for Sounds 1. Say a sentence 2. Draw a line for each word in the sentence (if needed) 3. Repeat sentence 4. Elongate the sounds in each word New Reading 1. Preview new book with child 2. Provide support (choral echo, strategic reading) 3. Child reads new book alone 4 fi< CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and Commission From: L. Dennis Whitt City Manager Date: August 12, 1997 Agenda Item # Subject: August 19, 1997 Commission Meeting Consultant Fees The attached resolution approves disbursement of payment to the Architectural and Engineering firm, Corzo, Castella, Carballo, Thompson & Salman, in the amount of $1,620.00 for services relating to the RFP for a Multi -use Development/Parking Garage. This firm is one of three Engineering and Architectural firms approved for services to the city by the Commission through an earlier process. They were selected by Administration to provide review and consultation through the selection process for this project. Disbursement will be paid from account # 001 -369 -920. I recommend approval. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO CONSULTANT FEES, AUTHORIZING PAYMENT TO CORZO, CASTELLA, CARBALLO, THOMPSON & SALMAN IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,620.00 WITH DISBURSEMENT PAID FROM ACCOUNT # 001 - 369 -920. WHEREAS, the Engineering and Architectural firm, Corzo, Castella, Carballo, Thompson & Salman was approved by the City Commission as a consultant for the city; and WHEREAS, the review process for selection of a developer Request for Proposals relating to a multi -use development /parking garage requires engineering and architectural technical assistance; and WHEREAS, administration selected Corzo, Castella, Carballo, Thompson and Salman to provide these services through the review and selection process; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The City Commission hereby authorizes the City Manager to disburse payment to Corzo, Castella, Carballo, Thompson and Salman in the amount of $1,620.00 for professional services rendered, relating to the multi -use development /parking garage, from account # 001 -369 -920. Section 2. upon approval. This resolution shall take effect immediately PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1997. ATTEST: APPROVED: CITY CLERK MAYOR READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY 6 � INVOICE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Engineers Architects Planners Page number 1 Project 1929 -03 RFP for Multiuse Development/Park-ng Garage 01 - Technical Assistance City of South Miami Building Dept. 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, F1 33143 Mr. L. Dennis Whitt, City Mgr. Professional Services For technical assistance provided in connection with the City's request for proposal for Multiuse Development /Parking Garage. Services provided during the weeks ending on the dates shown below: Professional Services Hours Rate Amount --------------- - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- PRINCIPAL Jorge E. Corzo, P.E. MEETINGS 7 -13 -97 Pre - Submittal Coordination 3.00 80.00 7 -13 -97 Pre - Submittal Conference 2.00 80.00 PROJECT COORDINATION 7 -13 -97 2.50 80.00 BID PHASE COORDINATION 7 -20 -97 12.00 80.00 DATA PROCESSOR (SECRETARY /EEO) Elizabeth Fernandez CLERICAL 7 -20 -97 1.00 24.00 Aurora Elena Rodriguez CLERICAL 7 -20 -97 1.50 24.00 Services total 22.00 Invoice total AUG U 1 1997 i - ARAGEi 'S uffi° Crl 240.00 160.00 200.00 960.00 24.00 36.00 ,620.00 - -- 1,620_00 N i FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Engineers 3 Architects AA 0021A Planners Project 1929 -03 RFP for Multiuse Project Billing Summary Professional Services Total Approved by rge . Corzo, P.E. C 3 T S Invoice number 5662 July 30, 1997 Page number 2 Development /Parking Garage Prior Current Total .00 1,620.00 1,620.00 .00 1,620.00 1,620.00 Equal Opportunity Employer CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Commission e �lCklG -(% FROM: L. Dennis Whitt City Manager DATE: August 19, 1997 RE: Agenda Item # /61 Commission Meeting, August 19, 1997 Approval of expenditure for repair work for Police Vehicle no. 94 -02 The attached resolution seeks approval of a $1,925.00 expenditure to repair police vehicle no. 94 -02. The patrol car was involved in an accident earlier this year. The repair of the vehicle is essential to the efficient operation of the Police Department. Three quotes for repair were obtained from local vendors. The quote with the best warranty and price was produced by Dream Team and Body Shop, Inc. The cost for the repairs will be charged to the City's "self insurance fund ". This is an important issue in that it affects the effectiveness of the police patrol car fleet. Therefore, I recommend approval. Attachments 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO DISBURSE THE SUM OF $1,925.00 FOR THE REPAIR OF POLICE VEHICLE NO. 94 -02 AND CHARGING THE DISBURSEMENT TO ACCOUNT NO. 04 -1500- 4680, "SELF INSURANCE FUND ". WHEREAS, the City of South Miami provides police protection for its citizens and business community, and; WHEREAS, Police Department patrol vehicle no. 94 -02 was recently involved in an accident and is in need of repair, and; WHEREAS, it is prudent to have police vehicles functional at all times in order to serve the citizens effectively. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION of the CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The Public Works Department has obtained the following quotes for the repair of vehicle no. 94 -02: Dream Team & Body Shop, Inc. - $1,925.00 Truck City, Inc. -$1,969.43 U.S. Body Shop, Inc. -$2,009.18 Section 2. The City Manager be, and is hereby authorized to disburse the sum of $1,925.00 to Dream Team & Body Shop, Inc. Section 3. That this resolution shall be effective immediately and after adoption hereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED this ATTEST: READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM City Attorney day of , 1997. MAYOR /01 08/11/1997 03: 1 3056677806 CITY OF SO MIA PURGH PAGE 01 _ Dgo d 33� rr�T.SCf ti t9°+1mc7WWW w � pp<°C• Of+IOQ• m Om7yo��11 r f~0 Np � DA7J02(NQ :-, D3��*- iZZmv)m< fni rp �C w oWxW3vo _ r r (A r "fnt7AO�DS�B+QNOAmm. •(q t! 4r rt r- m DScimr�i CDr"tnf+~iern o 0oxcow Fhf Q f70 rgR'�x• c° 2 -40S l7 t5-! m• -W y D -oar -e r roe, -.r o w zMi_ -mm�w -3 's P9 • p �? xA - %QD Z^ S 0 1,7 0 y rn. yyv ! R. 2 o r c 3 m it, Nh - =m, N A ! 1< s A- g t v y � i r''X3 =g��c2SA 3"'°tTD -7C�•S fOA f'rj� Ab <g �D• r�' �ar p Dr33 ch �ppOrZ D v --4 T_- mZ7C� C5 nA slb,� a m � �-q n 9 r rr- rrrr- r- r =rrr" rzir k` W W SAS 1rr1 rr (Amy rN10=fl1 r r O S-.i 7 ' v 3 •o •p v °r m— rnMOm M�r{nnir'�,r{+i r1Me�+rr1(*ir*�r<n i a °-Di n •• NtrltnfnfRVftnVrNNUf(//NNNVSN mrimr1mmI�31mRTrT''-ilrgm enmm a< ow (n !n in rJ+rnM fn t?r V�Nfl1 {Pl NNNfA O;w '.. r IV na ci WN i 1 v i r W 1 r w r a r4 Or O w� CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, FL 33143 my, TO: Mayor and Commission DATE: August 12, 1997 FRO 7 RE: Agenda Item # City Manager Commission Meeting August 19, 1997 Consulting Attorney Fees The attached resolution authorizes payment to Pedro Echarte, Jr., consulting attorney in the case of Forfeiture of 1991 Accura Legend. The City Attorney has examined and approved the fees as presented. Disbursement shall be in the amount of $484.73, and will be paid from account # 1500 -3410, "Consulting- Legal." 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE APPROVAL OF CONSULTING LEGAL ATTORNEY FEES IN THE AMOUNT OF $484.73 CHARGED TO ACCOUNT NO. 1500 -3410. WHEREAS, the South Miami City Commission approved Resolution no. 99 -94 -9500 authorizing the payment of City Attorney non - retainer legal fees and costs; and WHEREAS, the City Attorney submitted the invoices for fees and costs which are attached to this resolution; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The City Attorney's invoices for legal fees and costs, which are annexed and made a part of this resolution as composit App.l., are approved for payment. Section 2. The amount of $484.73 charged to account no. 1500 -3410; Consulting - Legal. Section 3. This resolution will be effective upon passage. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1997. ATTEST: CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED: MAYOR To: L. Dennis Whitt From: Earl G. Gallop CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM Date: July 31, 1997 Re: Payment of Forfeiture Attorney's Fees (Under $1, 000) Forfeiture of 1991 Acura Legend This memorandum transmits the July 28, 1997 invoice of Pedro P. Echarte, Jr., P.A., in the amount of $484.73, and requests that you pay same, charging the amount to the forfeiture account. Also attached is a status report from Pedro Echarte on this matter. EGG /sgs Enclosures cc: Hakeem Oshikoya Pedro P. Echarte, Jr., Esq. C AMYFILES \CSMMEMO S \WHITT.MM3 LAW OFFICES PEDRO P. ECHARTE, RJR., P.A. INTERNATIONAL PLACE 21sT FLOOR 100 SOUTHEAST 2ND STREET MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 PEDRO P. ECHARTE, JR. NORMA F. ECHARTE LEANNE.J. PFLAUM OF COUNSEL Invoice submitted to: Earl Gallop, Esq. City Attorney City of South Miami P.O. Box 330090 Coconut Grove FL 33233 -0090 TELEPHONE (305) 539-1226 TELECOPIER (305) 373-2073 July 28, 1997 In reference to: Forfeiture of One 1991 Acura Legend, 4 Door, Fla. It Tag No. LMA21U, Vin No. JH4KA763MC047209 (T. Mildren, Jr.) File No. 97.04.001 Hours Amount 05/01/97 Document and correspondence review. 0.50 45.00 Instructions to secretary. 05/09/97 Correspondence review, instuctions 0.40 36.00 to secretary re service of order. 06/04/97 Review file. Telephone conference 1.70 153.00 with process server. 06/09/97 Correspondence review. Motion for 0.80 72.00 judgment on the pleadings. Research. 06/11/97 Telephone conference with Ferguson. 0.90 81.00 Letter to Gallop. Correspondence review. 06/25/97 Attempt Ferguson. Letter to 0.50 45.00 Ferguson. It Earl Gallop, Esq. 06/30/97 Attempt Ferguson. For professional services rendered Additional charges: 05/20/97 Photocopies Postage 05/22/97 Photocopies Postage 06/12/97 Photocopies Postage 06/17/97 Photocopies Postage 06/18/97 Telecopy charges 663 -6337 06/25/97 Photocopies Postage Total costs Total amount of this bill Previous balance Balance due Page 2 Hours Amount 0.20 18.00 5.00 $450.00 0.75 0.32 1.00 0.64 9.50 1.60 1.00 0.64 17.00 1.00 1.28 $34.73 $484.73 $560.37 $1,045.10 /I u 7/31/97 18:39 0303 373 2073 E:NGELS, sPERTNOY � � 042/ 008'4 4A W O, F/CgS PEDRO P. ECHARTE, JR., RA. 1NIERNAT1ONAL sLAC,E dlsT ALOOIR PEDRO P. ECHARTE, JR. NORMA F. ECHARTQ LEANNE a, PFLAIJiA CF COJ Na LL Earl Gallop, Esq. South Miami City Attorney First Union Financiai Center Suite 3590 200 South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida 33131 $00 SOUTMLCAST 2"* STREET 41AM1, FUomDA 83131 July 31: 1997 VIA AC—SIMILE 858 -4777 RE: Forfeiture of One 1991 ACURA LEGEND, 4 DOOR, FLORIDA TAG NO. LMA21 U, VIN# JH4KA7632MC047209 (T. Mildren, Jr.) File No. 97.04.401 Dear Mr. Gallop: TE4CPNONE {3U5) 538.1a2e. "'Ec OPiER 1305 37;3-2073 On March 31, 1997, the above- referenced Acura Legend was seized by the Soi.rtn Miami Police Department as a result of its use by its owner for the purpose of conducting illegal drug transactions in violation of Florida Statute 932.701 et. sec. As a result of that seizure, and on behalf of tnv City cf South Miami, I sent notice 0-, the seizure to the two potential claimants. Thereafter, I filed the forfeiture complaint, supporting affidavit and caused a "Notice of Action" to be published in the Daily Susiness Review. I then obtained the Judge's order finding probable cause, caused tha complaint and the order findiing probable cause to be served upon both potential claimants. Because I did not receive any timely answer or motion directed to the forfeiture complaint by either claimant, I fled a motion for entry of a final default Judgment of Forfeiture. After 1 filed the motion for default I received an answer from Williams Ferguson, Esq. on behalf of both claimants. The certificate of mailing on the answer reflected that it had beer, timely filed. Therefore, I immediately contacted Judge Bloom's office in order to advise them that I had received the answer and that the final judgement of forfeiture should not be entered, Judge Bloom's secretary told me that the Judge had already entered the final judgment and that a copy of it was in the mail. For your review and convenience I enclose another copy of that final judgment. N Earl Gallop, Esq. July 31, 1997 'age Two of Two vai.1, 1uiJ. ENGELS, FERTNUY Upon my receipt of tf;e final judgment I immediately contacted attorney Ferguson to advise him that his answer, although filed timely, had not reached me in time and that 1 had obtained a final default judgment regarding the vehicle, Mr. Ferguson advised me that he would speak with his clients in order to determine whether or not his clients intended to pursue the matter further. Because Mr. Ferguson did not call me back and because nay numerous phone calls to him were not returned, on June 25th 1 wrote nim memorializing what had transpired and again requesting his advisements. I was finally able to reach him telephonically on July 7th. and I reminded him that the default judgment had been entered and that I needed to know what he intended to do. He apologized for not calling me back and informed me that he had not spoken to this clients but would do so and call me right back. Mr. Ferguson did not call me back and so on July 10th after numerous attempts I was finally able to reach hire again and he informed me that his clients intended to litigate the matter. Unfortunately, neither Mr. Ferguson nor his clients have done anything insofar as getting the default judgment set aside. I enclose for your review and convenience a copy of my letter to Mr. Ferguson which reflects that should he fail to take any action in this matter I would instruct my client to proceed with the sale of the automobile. Candidly I do not think that is the course of action that we ought to take. I believe that if Mr. Ferguson fails to take any action that this matter should be brought to the attention of Judge Bloom for his consideration but I do not think that I should be the one to ask that the default be set aside, and, unfortunately, Mr. Ferguson can request that relief at any time. For your further review I enclose a copy of my most resent letter to Mr. Ferguson which is self- explanatory. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments. PPE/se Enclosure cc: Lieutenant Vchael S. Mills � forc) �+.i YEEART PEDRO JR. (l August 1, 1997 Pedro P. Echarte, Jr., Esq. Pedro P. Echarte, Jr., P.A. 100 Southeast 2nd Street, 21st Floor Miami, FL 33131 Re: Forfeiture of One 1991 Acura Legend Your file no. 97.04.001 Dear Pedro: Please reply to: P.O. Box 330090 Coconut Grove, FL 33233 -0090 (305) 860 -7229 (305) 858 -4777 (Fax) Thank you for your July 31, 1997 status report. Please proceed to secure title to the 1991 Acura Legend on behalf of the City of South Miami. Contact L. Dennis Whitt, City Manager, regarding the use or disposition of the automobile. EGG /sgs cc: L. Dennis Whitt, City Manager C MYFILESyCStvMTRSvECHARTE.LTl Very truly yours, ./ arl G. Gallop City Attorney "City of Pleasant Living" t V CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, FL 33143 TO: Mayor and Commission DATE: August 12, 1997 RE: A ZW Agenda Item # FROM: e 9 City Manager Commission Meeting August 19, 1997 Consulting Attorney Fees The attached resolution authorizes payment to Stuart R. Michelson, consulting attorney in the case of Cunningham v. Harnden. The City Attorney has examined and approved the fees as presented. Disbursement shall be in the amount of $2,401.92, and will be paid from account # 1500 -3410, "Consulting - Legal." 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE APPROVAL OF CONSULTING LEGAL ATTORNEY FEES IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,401.92 CHARGED TO ACCOUNT NO. 1500 -3410. WHEREAS, the South Miami City Commission approved Resolution no. 99 -94 -9500 authorizing the payment of City Attorney non - retainer legal fees and costs; and WHEREAS, the City Attorney submitted the invoices for fees and costs which are attached to this resolution; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The City Attorney's invoices for legal fees and costs, which are annexed and made a part of this resolution as composit App.l., are approved for payment. Section 2. The amount of $2,401.92 charged to account no. 1500 - 3410; Consulting- Legal. Section 3. This resolution will be effective upon passage. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of ATTEST: CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED: MAYOR 1997. To: L. Dennis Whitt From: Earl G. Gallop CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI INTER °OFFICE MEMORANDUM Date: July 31, 1997 Re: Payment of Outside Counsel's Attorney's Fees Cunningham v. Hamden This memorandum transmits the May 22, 1997 invoice of Stuart R. Michelson in the amount of $2,401.92, and requests that you pay same, charging the amount to 1500 -3410. EGG /sgs Enclosures cc: Hakeem Oshikoya Stuart R. Michelson, Esq. C: \MYFILES \CSMMEMOS \WI IITT. MM4 /2 LAW OFFICE OF STUART R. MICHELSON II11 KANE CONCOURSE SUITE 517 BAY HARBOR ISLANDS, FLORIDA 33154 DADE (305) 861 -1000. BROWARD (954) 467 -6404 FACSIMILE (305) 864-4424 May 22, 1997 VIA TELEFAX (305) 858 -4777 Earl Gallop, City Attorney City of South Miami 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, Florida 33143 RE: Cunningham v. Harnden 04/24 Telephone conference with Harriet Lewis .2 ILM /Z STATEMENT HOURS DATE 03/31 Draft letter to Margaret Harnden; ILM telephone conference with Phil Claypool; draft fee petition 2.2 04/01 Review and revise correspondence to SRM Margaret Harnden and review petition .5 04/02 Finalize draft of fee petition; draft ILM letter to Earl Gallop 2.0 04/09 Telephone conference with Stuart Siegel .25 SRM 04/10 Draft memo to ILM re: telephone conference SRM with Stuart Siegel .25 04/15 Preparation for Executive Session; travel ILM to, attendance at and travel from Executive Session 4.75 04/24 Telephone conference with Harriet Lewis .2 ILM /Z Earl Gallop, City Attorney City of South Miami Page Two May 22, 1997 04/30 Telephone conference with Margaret ILM Harnden; draft joint stipulation and transmit to DOAH 1.5 05/16 Review Elias defamation suit .2 ILM SRM TOTAL ATTORNEY HOURS EXPENDED THIS BILLING: 1.0 HOURS ATTORNEY BILLING RATE PER HOUR: $200.00 PER HOUR $ 200.00 ISLM TOTAL ATTORNEY HOURS EXPENDED THIS BILLING: 10.85 HOURS ATTORNEY BILLING RATE PER HOUR: $200.00 PER HOUR $ 2,170.00 TOTAL LAW CLERK HOURS EXPENDED THIS BILLING: -0- HOURS LAW CLERK BILLING RATE PER HOUR: $60.00 PER HOUR $ -0- TOTAL FEES: $ 2,370.00 COSTS INCURRED: Facsimiles $20.00 Photocopies 3.00 Postage 8.92 TOTAL COSTS: $31.92 TOTAL FEES AND COSTS THIS STATEMENT: $ 2,401.92 PAST DUE BALANCE FROM STATEMENT DATED MARCH 3, 1997 $5,744.13 PAST DUE BALANCE FROM STATEMENT DATED MARCH 28, 1997 $2,389.25 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE: $10,535.30 11 MICHELSON /Z To: Sonia Lama, AIA Building Director From: Earl G. Gallop City Attorney CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM Date: July 31, 1997 Re: Dade County Ordinance Creating § 301.5 of SFBC In response to your 7/16/97 fax transmittal, please provide me with your evaluation and recommendation regarding implementation of the amended SFBC by the city. EGG /sgs cc: L. Dennis Whitt, City Manager C: \MYFILES \CSMMEMOS \LAMA.MM 1 0 City of South Miami Parks & Recreation Department Inter- Office Memorandum TO: Mayor & Commission FROi City Manager ----------------------------------------------------- DATE: August 13, 1997 SUBJECT: Agenda Item /3 Commission Meeting August 19, 1997 Resolution - Football Uniforms & Equipment ----------------------------------------------- - - - - -- The attached resolution seeks approval in releasing funds established in the 1996 -1997 budget of the Parks & Recreation Department for the purchase of Football uniforms and equipment. The money will be taken out of the Parks & Recreation account 2000 -5630 "Football ". The amount will not exceed $19,715.00. I recommend approval. c:\ wpdocs \wbitt.commissionfootbaU97 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY 3 OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF 4 FOOTBALL EQUIPMENT AND UNIFORMS FOR A TOTAL PRICE NOT TO 5 EXCEED $19,715.00 BY THE RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND 6 PROVIDING FOR DISBURSEMENT FROM RECREATION DEPARTMENT 7 ACCOUNT NUMBER 2000 -5630 "FOOTBALL ". 8 WHEREAS, pursuant to the 1996 -1997 Budget of the City of South 9 Miami, Florida, the City Recreation Department was authorized to 10 purchase Football uniforms and Football equipment for the Football 11 Program; and 12 WHEREAS, pursuant to Article III, Section 5 H, of the City 13 Charter which requires competitive bids from at least three 14 different sources of supply, the Recreation Department advertised 15 for bids for football equipment; and 16 WHEREAS, as a result of the bids received, the Administration 17 of the City of South Miami has now obtained a cost of $19,715.00 18 from US 1 Sporting Goods, for the equipment set forth in the 19 attached Memorandum. 20 21 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION 22 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: 23 Section 1. That a purchase order is awarded to US 1 24 Sporting Goods in an amount not to exceed $19,715.00 for football 25 equipment and uniforms. 26 Section 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately 27 upon approval. 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 PASSED AND ADOPTED this ATTEST: CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY — \wpdocs \res.97football day of August, 1997. APPROVED: MAYOR W s USS U.S. 1 SPORTING GOODS $ THE TEAM SPECIALISTS �Dt]DB 8145 N.W. 93rd Street Medley, Florida 33166 (305) 888 -5426 FAX: (305) 888 -5423 Account I. Street city a state Phone ERMS. F.O.S. POINT OF SHIPm, =mT Sales Order No.. Date Account No. Purchase Order No. Order will not be processed witho deposit and/or a purchase order Ship To street City s State zip- Phom ( ) Mfg. Stock # Color Size DESCRIPTION Quantity pry$ v G -rt��/ c 3 dv IV 6 f7j Al /� i. ti I� 5/-,/ r /Y- lD �Y r 101�_ 'g)— a•r> ORIGINAL SET-Up CHARGE y, STn,� • „� + $35.00 RE -ORDER SET --UP CHARGE + $18.00 t.- AJI sales orders aro final. 2.- A deposit and/or a purchase order is required to have sales order procewood SUB TOTAL 3.* All changes, must be made in writing 4. -Open term accounts must frays amount current to have sales order processed MISC. 5_- a 1.5% Per r+ nth finance change will be added to all past due invoices TAX s•- Collection tees, attomey's fees and court costs will be added if it becomes necessary FREIGHT MOTE: PLEASE CHECK THIS ORDER FOR ACCURACY TOTAL R1 ellcw weeks for delivery. Orders are non - cancellable and non - refundable. Signatunatu re: DEPOSIT i BALANCE i Extensior <.cr qgt; /a 40e, La 2 42, V0 !! ld,�v I/— W U I § 4 U.S. 1 SPORTING GOODS Color THE TEAM SPECIAUSTS DESCRIPTION 8145 N.W. 93rd Street Price Medley, Florida 33166 (305) 888 -5426 FAX: (345) 888 -5423 Amount Nan* C/? Lof 9trUlt Chy s State ZIP Phone ( 1 iERIdS: F.O.B. POINT OF SHIPMENT Sales Order No, Date Account No. _- Purchase Order No. Order will not be processed without a deposit and/or a purchase order Ship To ft "t --- np, o City A State Mom ( ) SNIP VIA Mfg. Stock # Color Size DESCRIPTION Quantity Price Extension .! - , /r f 9 f , -. / t to r / 7r, w , ?s-' - 7,9a • ' d' 1936, d-) ' ' ✓ 7 S� f- ��. C 7` J"' I) ORIGINAL SET-UP CHARGE + $35.00 T RE -ORDER SET-UP CHARGE + $18.00 I.- All sales orders are finai. SUB TOTAL 2.- A deposit and/or a purchase order is required to have sales order processed 3.- All changes, must be made in writing MISC. 4.- Open term accounts must have account current to have sales order processed TAX S. a 1.9% por month finance charge will be added to all past due invokes s:- Collection fees, attorney's tees and court costs wilt be added if k becomes necessary FREIGHT NOTE: PLEASE CHECK THIS ORDER FOR ACCURACY TOTAL Please allow weeks for delivery. Orders are non - cancellable and non - refundable. DEPOSIT Slanature: BALANCE 7. U.S. 1 SPORTING GOODS THE TEAM SPECIAUSTS 8145 N.W. 93rd Street Medley, Flodda 33166 (305) 888 -5426 FAX: (305) 888 -5423 A=nt Name 8trset., City d State 23p Phone ( ) TERMS: F.O.B. POINT OF SHIPMENT Sales Order No, Date Account No. Purchase Order No. Order will not be processed without deposit and/or a purchase order Ship To street Gty b states ap Ph" ( ) Mfg. Stock # Color Size DESCRIPTION Quantity Price Extension ?, c 9 �7. w e.1-- J ` u �11v 3 , i :S / Ly 01Af"' r v 3d i ORIGINAL SET-UP CHARGE + X35.00 RE- ORDER SETUP CHARGE + $18.00 t: All sales orders are final. TOTAL 2.- A deposit and/or a purchase order is required to have sales order pressed 3,- All changes, roust be made in writing MISC. 4; Open term a=unts must have account current to have sales order proomed TAX 5.. a 1.5N. liar month fiinaneo Charge will ba added to all pact due invo"a 8.- Collection tees, attorney's fees and court oasis will be added if it becomes necessary FREIGHT NOTE: PLEASE CHECK THIS ORDER FOR ACCURACY TOTAL Please allow- weeks for delivery. orders am non- cancellable and non - refundable. DEPOSIT Signature' _ _. BALANCE __'7 S:24PM fl:-Y-!3 -97 03:22 AM ea n d ROM WEBSTEP'S TEAM SPORT 954 733,.!0008 P. 1 PARKS �-Jj"R CREATION 6691266 P.02 _,f23 7 f CITY OF SOV 6 3 e I onone 1C.S) 663-.6319 ,.vEES1'T-ER'S TEAM SR 3560 W. PROSPECT o- *WW FMAUDERDALE, FL 33309 of South Miami. Recreation Department is S011titl-g bids "a purchase Of FOCtbail Equipment. All bids M;13t be t1lie RgCf eation Depart=ent Of f I -a by! ANoWlay, ,-uotat_-ans -an be faxed to 005)44KmQW-I -y of equal. style �f hardware nr io0L;:dll.4elmets dre RIDDELL `ASR -Y Royal Blue with attached white 1�11"=a4i face mask Qr iIR IV Helmets RcyaL BI-die with attached wh_­�_ 'faci-_ 3, 1/2 'A 6 R�TF, T 4LS ARE TO BE THE WILSON COMPAxY ONLY! � IL YnArrrp rncor qwvra r f-M&Or 0 TOTAL R PADS; --------------- -SHOULDER PADS ARE BIKE LASER #1000 ONLY! T SIZES j2UAtVT1 rY UNIT COST MAL COST 7950 26-28 ()4. d& 7951 28-30 0 av 7952 30-32 3-0 7953 32-34 31, �q J9. 4c-- TOTAL 31 0 r p 00 OIL) 7177AL COST -1 55-4�, 610 ,;/ ^ -1 ==197 S: 2SP 1 FRCH 'ViEESTEG S TEAP 1 SPOFT 954 733 0008 MAY — ! ? —•3F 07:22 Rm PARKS & RECREATION 1E.E50 1 Zrs$ WESSIER'S TEAM SP-OPTt, 3560 W. PROSPECT ROAD F% LAUDERDALE, EL 33309 P- 2 A SCELLAMHOUS I^TEMSz WANTrTY UN,tT Cd7.ST TOTAL 0057 1100K5 FOR SACK OF SHOULDER PADS 8 DOZ , r��, l8, Yo BIKE TAPE STYLE 47404 -1 1/2 l tk4 CS /591 ea yyw TEE HOOK I INCH DOZ ` o S 7, 40 STRING FOR SHOULDER PADS 1 GROSS QS� STRAPPING FOR SHOULDER PADS 3f ROLLS �� i (1 INCH WIDE BLACK) EXTRA POINT THE F-&cH �, `�� Iyo �i PLACE KICKING TEE -6 EACH �. g �' 70 BELT NYLON SLUE 75 EACH BELT NYLON WHITE 75 EACH TY r/ G o ,. AIR FACE GUARD HARDWARE Dp2t / /7, - u k, IN STRAP SUCKLE #7775-METAL 8 DOZ t7 0 �f 'P NUT FOR CFi2N -STRAP SNAPS #7772 S`'DOZ - "� HIPi STRAP St�ApS #7774 8 Ddb ! b� rte. V. RIDDELI. �RQNT FOCKE_T ASSEMBLY � PAIRS rf ~rfi m; -.. •�� 5 icfas.k'Y '^ ���" '�y„�' '�gc� �+.'"S z = ' .. _ P't i �� a :., `^ itIDDEI,L INTERIOR PAT?DrNG 1 SETS ,J --�' -' � y N.. � ;. �" .. .. _.: ^h+v �`�r- ' t��,',�,'y6, F- -�,„�� f 3*� -�.t _ ....:.:qO _ ¢r) • llGi _, RIDDELL 3AW PADS #45728 "LARGE0 PCs RIDDELL JAW PADS #45728 MED 30 i'-CS x ImpAiR KIT BOX #iZ75- '�k'CiR AIR Y&MM ELM ETS } a as FACE MASK BLIND�MAN P S � � � UNITS a# �, Y���"�*fz ', # eta :�-.f� .,fix,'- i- `+�''��„r=•. _- �.�r AIR INTERIOR PADDING ,r SET'S 2 t _ 13 --------------------------------- 6-17-1997 S:2SPM FROM WEBSTER'S TEAM SPORT 954 733 0008 MAY-13-97 03:23 AM JAM' & ts �A - Er -frAWS: W. PROSPECT ROi � SO, FL 33309 as UMEMALE 1171-, h iVrAL 00SI � em ................... ............. P. 3 P.04 &wxT cour . �,--IZVTAL COST S AR wil ! �t j- -W Pet* gel., A4 U AT Gll 71 r as, hi PADS iiIiL COST -Rows TBALL JERSEYS ARE TO BE RUSSELL ATHLETIC COMPANY OR EQUAL -: :- 1 .MODEL #255 -5. 5. 100 % DENIEN NYLON MESH DOUBLE PLY YOKE WTTH MODIFIED NECK. 100 % NYLON PORTHOLE MESH BODY. BID ON THE FOLLOWING: LONG LENGTH )(BELT LENGTH SIZE FREFERASLE SHORT LENGTH (SHII.ILMEL) SHIRTS WILL BE WHITE WITH BLUE 6 INCH NUMBERS ON THE FRONT OF THE JERSEY. 8 INCH NLTVMERS ON THE SACK OF THE JERSEY. 3 STRIPES ON THE SLEEVES. SPONSOR NAME ON THE BACK OF THE JERSEY AND "SOUTH MIAMI" ON THE FRONT OV THE JERSEY. SUES QUANT17-r LWIT COST TOTAL COST YOUTH 1ARGE YOUTH X-LARGE 31 yt"'I a 0 3 471, (00 ADULT SMALL ell ir 0 ADULT LARGE 70 ADULT '::''.ED I UM ----------- TOTAL 3 B-17-1997 S:26PH FROH %AjEBSTEP'S TEAR SPORT 954 73-3 0,008 MAY-jz-97 03:23 AM PO4RKS & RECREATION 66912C;6 V. L15 P. 4 TA ROT PANTS ARE TO BE 100 NYLON UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC OR EQUAL MODEL. ROYAL BLUE WITH 1/4 INCH STRIPING ON LEG. (WHITE, ROYAL BLUE, WHITE) BLUE BELT AND BLUE LACES INCLUDED. -! Z%NTlrr tfivrT COST YOUTH X-SMALL YOUTH SMALL YOUTH ?4Pn T T TM YOUTH LARGE YOUTH X-LARGE TOTAL 1,64 70TAL COST -3,17,:tl, FOOTBALL GAME PANTS; --------------------- FOOTBALL GAME PANTS F360 S!KE OR EGUAL MODEL, 100 NYLON METALLIC FRONT. 100 % NYLON BACK. 7 INCR 07,1KE THIGH AND POCKBT SYSTEM. ALLOW AFTER 8RAIDI.�Glj- BLUE SFLT'A= WITH 1/4 INCH STRIPING (GRAY, ROYAL BLUZ, vRAY) BLUE SELT. AND SLUE LACES INCLUDED OR WILSON F-577 YOUTH ANTRON FOOTBALL PANTS. SIZES; r- COST, fx x4TAL ADDULT LL 30 ZT AULT MSMAED I m - ADULT LARGE TOTAL 40 V'y E -1771997 5:27PM FROM WEBSTER' S TEAM SPORT 954 733:0008 may-13-97 03:25 AM PARKS S RECReOT I DN PARENT VOLUNTEERT SHIRTS: MbU W. M-Wtc; i t(VAV ff. LAUDERDALE, FL 33309 THESE TEE- SHIRTS SHOULD BE 140 % COTTON PREFERABLE. THE TEE - SHIRTS SHOULD BE WHITE WITH A LOGO IMPRINTED ON THE LEFT CHEST FRONT AND THE "PARENT VOLUNTEER" PRINTED ON THE BACK IN ROYAL BLUE LETTERING. SIZES: QUANTITY: UNIT COST: TOTAL COST ------ T I`�EDIUM - -- -- - -- ---- ---- -- ---- -- -- ADULT LARGE n ADULT x -Laww ADULT XX -LARGE 0 P. B p6wt i3 �..,,�..: ..... P. 5 , COLOR SKORTSM tRE 'r ROYAL', E tm WI'TH.,CROSS POCKETS Iii TFiE_ +gRQNT -AND WIT$ 2 BACK "POCKETS `v,.ABRIG:FSHOULD. HE:}50 $`'gOLYESTER A1V"b 5p $ } COTTON BLEND PREFERABLE: ,.,'!'EE NAME BRAND "BIKE "' z x� r =j8"P REF ERAB Lg , COACHES SHIRTS: Y GOLF TYPE SHIRT WITH COLLAR AND 2 BUTTONS AND POCKET AND LOGS? ON THE CREST. . sXzK5 qUA !rrrY UNI f COST TOTAL COST ALL SIZE$ 44 i Y CCACCNXS HATS WITH LOGO: _ gI1ANTITY UNIT COST IVrAL .COST- ONE SIZE FITS ALL 40 _ FOOTBALL I 'RACTrCE PANTS - IIiE; STXL# COQ OR EQUAL MODEL. PLAIN WHITE WITH ETR I NG AND BELT "Y` ItiUF?ED ' ' A `:_ YOUTH SMALLS -----° r1'TY - ONYT Cost 2VTAL G70ST „j 41/R J�.n X YOUTH +TEDIUM 1F3 E J�' YOUTH _�� ADULT MALL — .fi�� ADULT :4EDIUM ADULT LARGE�.. d Nwa k °ar5:� ii 1 a 4tJfi.�e,EYCi 1E ........ ............... �t --------- h:E�F'E�+TT��M 665lL 6 P.02 aarK5 ana R �4rea;�: i130 SLalsz Cr;ve vnone 30St 663- 6319 $Cot" Nflarr,; tiorics 33 ;43 �-. ti ,c��`-! °� �- • . e x t'° Dear Vendor, c �1L�G ✓M� The City of South Miami Recreation Department is - s611 —c-d ing k�1 for the purchase of Football Equipment. All bids must be - -, received in the Recreation Department Office by: Jkofty, ..'A; •: � -OW l . Quotations can be faxed to '`�� -- or submitted by mail. You can submit samples for bidding of equal style of hardware or' merchandise. FOOfi'DALL HELMETS Football helmets are RIDDELL 'VSR -Y Royal Blue with attached white Blindm;an face mask or AIR IV Helmets Royal Blue with attached white Slindman face mask. SIZES: I ANTITY UNIT COST TQTAL COST � 8 7 7 1/4 - 7 MED r UM 1/2 - -- ,LARGE Po TOTAL WMBALLS: FOOTBALLS ARE TO BE THE WILSON COMPANY ONLY! M' DE'L # QUANfiry UNI T Cos 21 TOTAL C_ DST MODEL F 1362 K - 2 j MODEL F 1360 TAJ MODEL F 1300 TOY TOTAL f SHOULD SHOULDER PADS ARE BIXE LASER #1000 ONLY: AWDEL # SIZES W1 7' COSH' TOTAL COSS7, . 7951 7951 .2.28-30 j. SS ('0 � �. (' 7952 7953 30 -32 32 -34�E q V6. a i0 X20. S0 T©TALk _ Y �tPP SPt3RT1�lG �pOgS, �N��G.� SD �� 13 TIDE 1 S " 't P . 04 COLOR SHORTS: rew - -rw err - - COLOR .w +. SHORTS ARE TO BE ROYAL BLUE WITH CROSS POCKET'S IN THE FRONT AND WITH 2 BACK POCKETS, FABRIC SHOULD DE 50 % POLYESTER AND 50 � COTTON BLEND PREFERABLE. THE NAME BRAND "_BIKE" IS PREFERABLE, COACHES SHIRTS: � GOLF TYPE SHIRT WITH COLi,,AR AND 2 BUTTONS AND POCKET LOGO ON THE C EST . - q • t� •�-� ( UAXTI TY UNIT CAST TOTAL COST ;;ALL S-I ZES � _ . , e * COACRE"S HATS WITH _ LOCO; QUANTITY UNIT C057 TOTAL COST NE SIZE FI'B'S ALL 40 x s i FOOTBALL PRACTICE PANT'S .. - - -_�4 ---------------- PANTS ARE TO BE HIKE STYLE # 700 OR EQUAL MODEL. PLAIN WHITE WITH STRI NG AND BELT ;NCLUDED. SIZES �F �% X, . '�'� %l �% ANTITY UNIT COSH' TOTAL CUSS' YOUTH SMAL-% 'R` j•UZ. YOU'T' H INS' D i ll l'i YOUTH LARGE 47 " - - - y ADULT SMALL_r "� ADULT MEDIUM ADULT LARGE TOTAL .:Fawn,........, r. "�yi -w.'Si _.,x.�. - *vW _ "• � - -. -" . _.'_ .OL zipp SPORMIG 5734 Sunsetorl., INC. .33143 5/ r b• 4,,; BIKE PL 57 WITH HEST$ "(STYLE # 7657 OR EQUAL STYL KATE PADS: ]3 IKE P v 50 (STYLE #1659 OR EQUAL STYLE) 2VrGH FADS BIKE PL 55 OR EQUAL STYLE ANTITY 'COST 'A�._COST AtV7`X TY I T COST rOTAL COST �.31� -51'1 H5 OZI,4NTt 4rY UN.I T COST TOTAL COST GAW ,JERSEYS: iWTSALL JERSEYS ARE TO BE RUSSELL ATHLETIC COMPANY OR EQUAL MODEL #255 -55• 100 % DENNnORTHOLE M.ESH4EODY. PLY BIDYONk;Tk�TH MODIFIED NECK. 100 % NYLON FOLLOWING. S LONG LENGTH BELT LENGTH SIZE PREFERABLE SHORT LENGTH (SITYc*4EL) cn +q �� SG V `7 SHrRTS.wILL BE WHITE WITH BLUE 5 INCH NIERS ON THE FRONT OF THE JERSEY. 8 INCH NVtAM ERS ON THE SACK OF TFiET�R�ERSEy�ANDR� SOUTH N THE SLEZ ES. SPONSOR NAME ON THE HACK OF - MIAMI" ON THE FRONT OF THE ERSEY. TOTAL _COST -YOUTH SIZES ,{QUA T i l' ; [IN7 T _ GOST _ ' LAFQE l j . zo .� �lD[fiLT SMALL Y ADULT MEDI Um. ADULT LARGE TOTAL ZIPP SPORTING GOODS, INC. South 5734 Sur?set Drive 3 MAY-t3-97 4I? : vf, AM PARKS & RECPEAT i ON 66S t 266 P. 07 PARENT VOLUNTEERT SHIRTS: THEE TEE - SHIRTS SHOULD SE 104 % COTTON PREFERABLE. THE TEE - SHIRTS SHOULD BE WHITE WITH A LOGO IMPRINTED ON THE LEFT CHEST FRONT AND THE "PARENT VOLUNTEER" PRINTED ON THE BACK IN ROYAL BLUE LETT . RING. SIZES: QUANTITX: _. —UNIT GOST: TO'T'AL COSTS _ ------ --- - - ---- yrp--- --- -- •+wli M.�ww.rwA ADULT MEDIUM: ADULT LARGE ADULT X- LARGE ADULT XX -I.ARGE G:(' '_ 'sRnri rinrtrs.+ffkl + nnnnr 1AIf* /3 _ �r six TAPE STYLF_ #7404, -1 cs TEE HOOK 1. INCH " •� Do z STRING FOR SHOULDER PADS 1 CROSS STRAPPING FOR SHOULDER PADS s, ROLLS (1 INCH WIDE BLACK) EXTRA PINT TEE i EACH PLACE KICKING TEE 6 EACH 13ELT NYLON BLVE 75 EACII BELT NYLON WHITE :. 75 EACH AIR FACE GUARD HARDIdARF D4z CHIN STRAP BUCKLE X7775 ITAL - 8 "DOZ T-NUT FOR CHI -N STRAP SNAPS #7772 S DOZ CHIN STRAP SNAPS #7774 5 Doz RIDDELL FRONT POCKET ASSEMBLY 1,,1�' PATRS RIDDELL INTERIOR PADDING 16 SETS RIDZj'LLL JAW PADS ##45728 LARGE 30 PCS RIDZZL a JAW PADS 445728 MED 30 PCs REP-AIR KI; BOX #27517 ( FOR AIR 1V HELIME7S ) FACE :dASX BLI"'IMMAN PLUS AIR 'TERIOR PADDING !'� ' a ;SETS ,^ { * { 4 r UNIT C' T �J ALI• e 3 ZIPP SPORTING GOODS, INC. 5734 Sunset Drive di fin►�th {v ; -Imi f'.n6 .4 ?31 1? 2 jj i d SG • Cie-) z e 3 ZIPP SPORTING GOODS, INC. 5734 Sunset Drive di fin►�th {v ; -Imi f'.n6 .4 ?31 1? 2 jj i d SG e 3 ZIPP SPORTING GOODS, INC. 5734 Sunset Drive di fin►�th {v ; -Imi f'.n6 .4 ?31 1? 2 jj ZIPP SPORTING GOODS, INC. 5734 Sunset Drive di fin►�th {v ; -Imi f'.n6 .4 ?31 1? 2 jj Y-1u. -v r Sao FOOTBALL CAME PANTS: PANTS ARE TO BE 100 % NYLON UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC OR EQUAL MODEL. ROYAL BLUE WITH 1/4 INCH STRIPING ON LEG. (WHITE, ROYAL BLUE, WHITE) BLUE BELT AND BLUE LACES INCLUDED. sI 'S _QUAATlrTY UNIT Cos WTAL COST YOVrH X - SMALL , — YOUTH SMALL YOU'T'H MEDIUM YOUTH LARGE _ YOUTH X -LARGE TOTAL f FOOTBALL GAME PANTS: FOOTBALL GAME PANTS F360 BIKE OR EGUAL MODEL. 100 NYLON METALLIC FRONT. 100 % NYLON BACK. 2 INCH ZLASTIC WAIST. FULL DUDE THIGH AND POCKET SYSTEM. ALLOW AFTER BRAIDING. BLUE BELT AND WITH 1/4 INCH STRIPING (GRAY, ROYAL BLUE, GRAY) BLUE MELT AND BLUE LACES INCLUDED OR WILSON F-577 YOUTH ANTRON FOOTBALL PANTS. SIZES. ADULT SMALL ' 34) ADULT ME�?IUM.. ADULT LAREE TOTAL QUANTITY: UNIT COST: - __fl2- Z1PP SPORTING GOODS, INC. 5734 Sunset Drive South M!s r;i, Flo s;,i 33143 } {� Fl�r TOTAL 4 /3 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI INTER- OFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and City Coin' ssion Date: August 13, 1997 Agenda Item #, From: L. D Re: Comm. Mtg. 08/19/97 City anager Plan Amendment Ordinance REQUEST: AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA APPROVING AMENDMENT 96 -2ER TO THE ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT THE RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED IN THE EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT [EAR]; PROVIDING FOR RE- NUMBERING AND /OR COMBINATION OF PARTS OF THIS ORDINANCE WITH OTHER SECTIONS OR PARTS OF SECTIONS OF THE SOUTH MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS: The proposed ordinance adopts revised, EAR -based amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, per the recommendations of the 1995 Evaluation & Appraisal Report [EAR], the deliberations of the South Miami Planning Board, and the formal response of the Department of Community Affairs. This revised amendment package incorporates the input of the Planning Board, acting as the Local Planning Agency, during the Public Workshop Meeting held on November 12, 1996 and November 26, 1996, the Public Hearing held by the Planning Board on December 10, 1996, and at the Public Hearing held at the first reading by the City Commission on January 7, 1997. Changes which reflect the recommendations of the Department of Community Affairs [DCA] are addressed. DCA's request for new data and analysis for Amendment No. 16 regarding the Transportation Element has been completed by the firm of C3TS, P.A., and is included as color photocopies inserted in Amendment No. 16. The request for additional information regarding the Housing Element has been prepared by staff and is included as yellow insert pages. DCA's suggested changes to proposed language in the Future Land Use Categories regarding permitted intensity are included as green insert pages. DCA's suggestions for the Infrastructure Element are included as orange insert pages in the language to be adopted in Amendment No. 15. RECOMMENDATION: Approval. Attachments: Ordinance for Adoption and Public Hearing Amendment Package 96 -ER2 with Locator Maps (separate) City Manager's Report to City Commission, dated January 2, 1997 Staff Report to the Planning Board, dated December 6, 1996 Excerpted Planning Board Minutes from November 12, 1996 Excerpted Planning Board Minutes from November 26, 1996 Excerpted Planning Board Minutes from December 10, 1996 City Manager's Report: Amendment 96 -ER2: Second Reading AND Public Hearing 1 Correspondence received regarding proposed amendments: Letter, dated April 9, 1997, from DCA with attached responses Letter, dated December 10, 1996, from Ernesto Medino, Esq. Letter, dated December 6, 1996, from Lisa R. Carstaphen Letter, dated December 4, 1996, from South Miami Garden Club Letter, dated December 2, 1996, from Patrick Fiorentino Letter, dated November 5, 1996, from Larry M. Schokman Letter, dated October 29, 1996, from Stephen D. Pearson Letter, dated October 29, 1996, from Ernesto Medino, Esq. Copies of sample advertisement and courtesy letter regarding proposed amendments: Miami Herald, Local Section (countywide), Sunday, November 24, 1996, found on Page 5B Courtesy Letter, dated November 29, 1996, sent to all owners of directly affected properties Courtesy Letter, dated November 29, 1996, sent to all owners of directly affected properties Listing of all advertisements published regarding proposed amendments (copies not attached): October 29, 1996 Planning Board Public Participation Workshop [canceled - lack of quorum] Miami Review, Friday, October 18, 1996 Miami Herald, Neighbors, Sunday October 20, 1996 November 12, 1996 Planning Board Public Participation Workshop [continued to 11/26/96] Miami Review, Friday, November 1, 1996 Miami Herald, Sunday, Neighbors, November 3, 1996 Miami Herald, Local Section (countywide), Sunday, October 27, 1996 Miami Herald, Local Section (countywide), Sunday, November 3, 1996 December 10, 1996 Planning Board Public Hearing Miami Review, Wednesday, November 27, 1996 Miami Herald, Sunday, Neighbors, December 1, 1996 Miami Herald, Local Section (countywide), Sunday, November 24, 1996 Miami Herald, Local Section (countywide), Sunday, December 1, 1996 January 7, 1997 City Commission Meeting Miami Review, Friday, December 27, 1996 Miami Herald, Neighbors, Sunday, January 5, 1997 Miami Herald, Local Section (countywide), Sunday, December 29, 1996 August 19, 1997 City Commission Meeting Miami Review, Friday, August 8, 1997 Miami Herald, Neighbors, Sunday, August 17, 1997 Miami Herald, Local Section (countywide), Thursday, August 14, 1997 6 -ER2: Second Reading AND Public Hearin 2 1 City Manager's Report: Amendment 9 g g 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA APPROVING AMENDMENT 96 -2ER TO THE ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT THE RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED IN THE EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT [EAR]; PROVIDING FOR RE- NUMBERING AND /OR COMBINATION OF PARTS OF THIS ORDINANCE WITH OTHER SECTIONS OR PARTS OF SECTIONS OF THE SOUTH MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, in accordance with Chapter 163, Part II, F.S., and Chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, the City of South Miami is required to prepare and submit for review by the Department of Community Affairs an Evaluation and Appraisal Report [EAR] to assess and evaluate the success and effectiveness of the City of South Miami's Comprehensive Plan; and, WHEREAS, on August 29, 1995, after Public Hearing regarding the proposed EAR, the Planning Board, acting in its capacity as the Local Planning Agency, voted 5:0 to transmit to the City Commission for their adoption, the 1995 Evaluation & Appraisal Report of the South Miami Comprehensive Plan for the 1989 -1994 Planning Cycle, including recommendations regarding the future vision and community goals of City of South Miami, Florida; and, WHEREAS, the 1995 Evaluation & Appraisal Report [EAR] contains recommendations for proposed amendments to the adopted South Miami Comprehensive Plan; and, WHEREAS, on December 10, 1996, after Public Hearing regarding the proposed amendments, the Planning Board, acting in its capacity as the Local Planning Agency, voted 4:1 to recommend approval of Amendment 96 -2ER and disapproval of the language contained in the Multiple - Family Residential (Four- Story) category, in accordance with the procedures under Chapter 163, Part II, F.S., Rule 9J -5, F.A.C., and the City of South Miami's adopted Public Participation Plan; and, WHEREAS, the City Commission desires to accept the recommendations of the Planning Board. .Amendment 96 -2ER Ordinance: 2nd Reading August 19, 1997 Af 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. Amendment 96 -2ER to the adopted Comprehensive Plan of the City of South Miami implementing the recommendations contained in the Evaluation & Appraisal Report, attached hereto and entitled "Exhibit 96- 2ER ", is hereby approved and adopted, including amended language for the Multiple- Family Residential (Four- Story) category as indicated and contained in Amendment XV. Section 2. Any sections or parts of sections of this ordinance may be renumbered and /or combined with other sections or parts of sections of the South Miami Comprehensive Plan and any amendments thereto, as is necessary to ensure the continuity and consistency within and between the various elements of the South Miami Comprehensive Plan. Section 3. If any section, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, the holding shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 4. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 5. This ordinance shall take effect in accordance with the provisions set forth in §163.3189(2)(a), Fla. Statutes. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of August, 1997. ATTEST: CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED: MAYOR c:/ ... /EAR- Amends /AM -Ord 2nd.doc Amendment 96 -2ER Ordinance: 2nd Reading August 19, 1997 v CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Planning Board Chair & Members From: Bill Mackey, AICP Director of Planning & Zoning REQUEST: ITEM: PB -96 -024 Applicant: Local Planning Agency Date: December 6, 1996 Re: PB -96 -024 EAR -based Amendments Items for Review at this Planning Board Public Hearing Will Include: I. Madison Square Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment II. Charrette Too Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment III. Marshall Williamson Park Re- Configuration Amendment IV. Park View Townhouses Land Use Amendment V. Community Center Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment VI. Hometown District Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment VII. Multi- Family Singular Designation Land Use Amendment 14 Willis D l won Lan T�irenttiir°e VIII -h Jean H. Willis Park Preservation & Sylva G. Martin Park Designation Amendment IX. South Miami Hospital Land Use Amendment X. South Miami Shopping Center Land Use Amendment XI. South Miami Middle School Correction Amendment XII. Ludlam Office Land Use Replacement Amendment XIII. Girl Scout Park Correction Amendment XIV. Red Road Residential Office Correction Amendment XV. Ear -Based Comprehensive Plan Language Amendments XVI. Ear -Based Transportation Element Amendment The Public Hearing will allow time for discussion among Planning Board members, acting as the Local Planning Agency, members of Planning & Zoning Division staff and the general public. The Public Hearing meeting agenda will allow time for the following: 1. Presentation of research and materials from the planning staff; 2. Public discussion of concerns and comments; and, 3. Discussion on the topics raised during the staff presentation and the public input. Planning Board Staff Report: Amendment 96 -2ER (DCA No. 97 -1ER) 114 The City welcomes the participation of those who have a special interest as well as those who have a general interest in the Comprehensive Plan. Members of the public are encouraged to prepare written comments and suggestions to be submitted to both staff and workshop members. Format: Planning Staff will make a presentation to members of the Board and request a motion for approval to transmit an amendment on behalf of the Planning Board, acting as Local Planning Agency, to the City Commission. BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS: In accordance with Chapter 163, Part II, F.S., and Chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, the City of South Miami is required to prepare and submit for review by the Department of Community Affairs an Evaluation and Appraisal Report [EAR] to assess and evaluate the success and effectiveness of the City of South Miami's Comprehensive Plan. On August 29, 1995, after Public Hearing regarding the proposed EAR, the Planning Board, acting in its capacity as the Local Planning Agency, voted affirmatively 5:0 to transmit to the City Commission for their adoption the 1995 Evaluation & Appraisal Report of the South Miami Comprehensive Plan for the 1989 -1994 Planning Cycle, including recommendations regarding the future vision and community goals of City of South Miami, Florida and recommendations for proposed amendments to the adopted South Miami Comprehensive Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Board vote to recommend approval of the amendment. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The proposal is consistent with the revised goals, objectives and policies proposed in the Evaluation & Appraisal Report of the City of South Miami adopted Comprehensive Plan. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Rule 9J -5, F.A.C., Rule 9J -11, F.A.C., & Chapter 163, F.S. Planning Board Staff Report: Amendment 96 -2ER (DCA No. 97 -1ER) /9 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and City Commission Date: January 2, 1996 REPRINTED EXCEPRT Agenda Item # From: L. Dennis Whitt Re: Comm. Mtg. 01/07/96 City Manager Plan Amendment 96 -2ER BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS: The proposed ordinance adopts revised, EAR -based amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, pursuant to the recommendations of the 1995 Evaluation & Appraisal Report [EAR] and the deliberations of the Planning Board. This revised amendment package incorporates the input of the Planning Board, acting as the Local Planning Agency, based upon their discussions and the input of the public received during the Public Workshop Meeting held on November 12, 1996, and continued on November 26, 1996. The bases of the amendments includes the Future Vision and Community Goals in the adopted EAR (see page i) and the results of the Hometown Charrette and the Hometown Too Charrette. On December 10, 1996, Planning Board voted 4:1 to recommend approval of the amendment and disapproval of the language contained in the Multiple - Family Residential (Four -Story) land use category. The Planning Board was unable to determine an alternate language for this issue. The issue regarding the Multiple - Family Residential (Four- Story) category is as follows. The Comprehensive Plan currently contains two land use categories for Multiple - Family Residential: one which permits up to 24 units per acre at a maximum height of four stories and one which permits up to 18 units per acre at a maximum height of two stories. Pursuant to the Community Goal to simplify the number and complexity of regulations, the adopted 1995 EAR proposes that the two categories be combined into one land use designation. For the less intensive of the two districts (up to 18 units per acre), the permitted height and density would remain the same under the regulations set forth in the Land Development Code. Some members of the Planning Board were unable to vote for approval of language which they felt might be used as a future vehicle for re- zoning of properties. The Planning Board Chair led the supporting members of the Board in recommending for the simplification of the categories; however, the Board was unable to muster a majority vote to recommend approval or denial. Staff has included proposed alternate language in Amendment XV for the City Commission to consider for adoption. This language is intended to address the concerns of the Planning Board and support the Community Goals adopted by the City Commission. The proposed language can be found on page 63 of the amendment package. RECOMMENDATION: Approval with proposed, alternate language in Amendment XV. Iq City Manager's Report: Amendment 96 -ER2: First Reading AND Public Hearin 1 t3' g � g g PLANNING BOARD MINUTES FROM NOVEMBER 129 1996 IV ITEM: PB -96 -022 Applicant: Local Planning Agency Request: PUBLIC WORKSHOP MEETING REGARDING 17 PROPOSED EAR - .RELATED COMPREHENSIVEPLAN AMENDMENTS. Items for Review at this Planning Board Public Workshop Meeting Will Include: I. Madison Square Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment II. Charrette Too Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment III. Marshall Williamson Park Re- Configuration Amendment IV. Park View Townhouses Land Use Amendment V. Community Center Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment VI. Hometown District Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment VII. Multi - Family Singular Designation Land Use Amendment VIII. Jean H. Willis Park Land Use Re- Location Amendment IX. South Miami Hospital Land Use Amendment X. South Miami Shopping Center Land Use Amendment XI. South Miami Middle School Correction Amendment XII. Ludlam Office Land Use Replacement Amendment XIII. Girl Scout Park Correction Amendment XIV. Little Park Correction Amendment XV. Red Road Residential Office Correction Amendment XVI. Ear -Based Comprehensive Plan Language Amendments XVII. Ear -Based Transportation Element Amendment The workshop will allow time for discussion among Planning Board members, acting as the Local Planning Agency, members of Planning & Zoning Division staff and the general public. The workshop meeting agenda will allow time for the following: 1. Presentation of research and materials from the planning staff, 2. Public discussion of concerns and comments; and, 3. Discussion on the topics raised during the staff presentation and the public input. Jean H. Willis Park Land Use Re- Location Amendment: Mr. Mackey explained that this portion of the meeting involves a workshop during which Board direction and public input will be sought in regard to several items, i.e., the 17 proposed Comp Plan amendments included in the Evaluation & Appraisal Report (EAR) and listed on tonight's agenda under PB -96 -022. Mr. Mackey noted that the EAR -based amendments will come back before the Planning Board for further review at a future date. Mr. Mackey requested that consideration of the individual amendments be completed not necessarily in the order enumerated on tonight's agenda. Mr. Mackey asked that Amendment VIII, Jean H. Willis Park Land Use Re- Location Amendment, be heard first. Mr. Mackey began by presenting background information on the EAR, an extensive project that was conducted by the City throughout 1995. Mr. Mackey explained that, as a result of the undertaking, an EAR document was adopted by the City Commission that contained a variety of recommendations and a series of changes to the City's Land Use Map. Mr. Mackey noted that one item which was proposed involved the potential move of Jean H. Willis Park from its current location on SW 61 Court to a location at the Sylva G. Martin Building on Sunset Drive. Mr. Mackey added that a site in front of this building, particularly along Sunset Drive, would enhance public exposure of the park. Following staff's presentation, public hearing was opened. PB Min 11/12/96 4 Iq Mr. Larry Schokman, representative of the Tropical Flowering Tree Society, signed in to speak before the Board. Mr. Schokman began by referencing the letter he had written to the City and had addressed to Mayor Cunningham. Mr. Schokman continued by reviewing the sequence of events that led to several improvements of the park by the Society in 1992. He noted current features of the parkas well, including maturing trees and nesting birds. Mr. Schokman opined that, particularly after much investment and with many natural attractions, moving the park "doesn't make any sense" from both a fiscal and conservation point of view. He added that the Society would be opposed to the City moving the park to a site at the Sylva G. Martin Building. Mr. Schokman closed by imploring for the City to allow Jean H. Willis Park to remain at its current location. Mr. Michael Miller, business owner, signed in and spoke before the Board. Mr. Miller inquired rhetorically as to whom would use the parking lot built to supersede the park, if such a lot were erected at the location, and he asked that the City address the use of the lot as a paramount issue in this case. Mr. Miller mentioned several uses for a lot at that particular property, such as parking for South Miami Hospital and South Miami City Hall, and including parking for tenants at new buildings erected in the vicinity. Ms. Ann Bass, former City of South Miami Commissioner, signed in to speak before the Board. Ms. Bass opened by stating for the record that, in addition to herself, she was present to represent her mother, Ms. Jean H. Willis, a former City Commissioner for whom the park commemorates. Ms. Bass wished to clearly indicate her, as well as Ms. Willis's, opposition to the relocation of the park, particularly in regard to the survivability of any trees that would be uprooted and moved. Ms. Bass characterized the proposal to beautify the area in front of the Sylva G. Martin Building as a "grand idea "; however, both she and Ms. Willis respectfully requested that the City consider the beautification proposal without further contemplating the park relocation. Mr. David Tucker Sr., of 6556 SW 78 Terrace, signed in and spoke before the Board. Mr. Tucker stated his belief that providing open space is something positive a municipality can do for its citizens. He further stated that he would be in favor of restoring green space at the Sylva G. Martin Building, but that it be done in conjunction with the Jean H. Willis Park remaining at its current location, both of which would constitute positive things the City could do for its citizens. Ms. Doris Rosebraugh, a South Miami resident, described the park as an "island of color in a sea of asphalt ". Ms. Rosebraugh noted that the park affirms South Miami's motto "The City of Pleasant Living ". Mr. Jim Dundorf, a new South Miami resident, signed in. Mr. Dundorf asked for clarification regarding tonight's proceedings. Staff responded to Mr. Dundorf's inquiries by explaining that both they and the Planning Board are reviewing preliminary information at this point, information that includes the park relocation amendment, all of which has been gleaned from a variety of sources, including the City's Charrette II process held in 1994. Mr. Christopher Cooke - Yarborough, Chairperson of the City's ERPB, spoke before the Board, however he did not sign in for the record. Mr. Cooke - Yarborough commented on the park's location at SW 61 Court, noting that it is currently "land- locked" in an area of commercialism, a PB Min 11/12/96 location which minimizes the park. Mr. Cooke - Yarborough opined that the park would have a greater impact if relocated to an area at the Sylva G. Martin Building site. Ms. Suzanne Wolfsohn, of 6790 Sunset Drive, approached the Board. Ms. Wolfsohn asked that the issue be examined in regard to what the park does for those who visit it, particularly for those who work or live in nearby areas. Ms. Wolfsohn requested that the City allow the park to be left as is, the restoration of the building's green space to be permitted, and a parking alternative, such as a parking garage; to be considered. Ms. Susan Redding, of 7930 SW 58 Court, spoke before the Board. Ms. Redding gave historical background relating to the park, particularly that which occurred prior to the Society's involvement, explaining that earlier studies had determined that the park should be erected at the Sylva G. Martin Building site. Ms. Redding stated her opinion that the park, at its current location, is in the "wrong place ". Ms. Redding continued by stating her belief that any park commemorating Ms. Willis's service to the City "...needs to be seen, needs to be used, needs to be adored by all of us." Public Hearing was closed. Following the close of the public hearing, Mr. Mackey asked that the Board consider three options during deliberations involving the park amendment, in order to include language stating: 1) that the existing park would be allowed to remain at its current location; 2) that both areas, the park site and the building site, would be designated as park space; or 3) that the existing park would be relocated, as worded in the proposed amendment. Mr. Kerr stated his desire that the entire City Hall complex be landscaped and surrounded by green space, thereby creating something "... exciting and new..." that would meet the City's needs. Mr. Kerr followed up on prior suggestions by stating that the City may wish to consider keeping the Jean H. Willis Park at its present location and restoring the green space at the Sylva G. Martin Building. Ms. Thorner commented that she was opposed to the relocation amendment from the very beginning and remains opposed to it now. Ms. Thorner stated, that with a lot of work and "imagination ", the City can obtain both a park of great beauty and a restoration of green space. Ms. Dupree stated that she would be in favor of allowing the park to remain at its present location and, if the current parking lot should remain as is, landscaping the building to camouflage the appearance of a vast parking lot. Ms. Dupree added that the park has been dedicated at its current location and therefore should be allowed to continue at the SW 61 Court property. Mr. Illas mentioned that he would be in favor of keeping the park at its present location and beautifying the property at the building. Mr. Illas stated that he would vote for language that would reflect and incorporate these two ideas. Mr. Basu encouraged the City to examine this issue very closely. Mr. Basu remarked that he believes the park should remain as is, showing a park land designation, and the City Hall complex itself should reflect the results of an enacted master plan. PB Min 11/12/96 6 ' Mr. Mackey responded that staff desires to consider and follow the consensus of the Board. Mr. Mackey stated that, based on the Board's input presented thus far, both the building and the park would be designated as parks and open space in the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Mr. Mackey added that language would be included for a "campus- wide" plan for the City Hall complex itself. Mr. Mackey asked that a date be set for a public hearing, suggesting December 10, 1996. The Board concurred that the December 10th date would be acceptable. Mr. Basu directed the Board's attention to staff's understanding of tonight's proceedings to this point. In regard to the Sylva G. Martin Building, Mr. Basu suggested that that property's designation remain flexible at this time, in order to permit review of an overall plan for the City Hall complex. Mr. Basu added that that particular property may not entirely carry a "parks" designation following such a review. In response to Ms. Dupree's inquiry, staff confirmed that there is no master, or projects, plan currently in effect for the City Hall complex. Mr. Mackey suggested that two amendments be drafted for the Board's further consideration, containing language stating: 1) that both the Jean H. Willis Park location and the Sylva G. Martin Building site be designated as "parks and open recreation space "; and, 2) that only the Jean H. Willis Park location be designated as "parks and open recreation space ". Madison Square Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment: Mr. Mackey explained that the meeting would continue with consideration of Amendment I, Madison Square Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment. Mr. Mackey began by stating that Madison Square was identified by the City's Charrette II process for establishment as a "node ", or mass, containing neighborhood retail businesses. Mr. Mackey noted that Madison Square would consist of "four corners" by designating four parcels north of the NR zoning district. Public hearing was opened. Mr. Michael Miller, business owner, spoke before the Board. Mr. Miller implored the City "to do something" about the area under consideration, and he asked the City to institute zoning regulations encouraging success of businesses that would locate in the area. Mr. Miller opined that profitability and safety of businesses and people in the subject area are of paramount concern for the City. Mr. David Tucker Sr., of 6556 SW 78 Terrace, approached the Board. Mr. Tucker confirmed that the subject area was extensively studied by the Charrette II participants. Mr. Tucker continued by stating that as a result of the study during the charrette, it was determined that the area of the future Madison Square continues to be historically and socially important to the surrounding community. Mr. Tucker opined that it is now the City's responsibility to put the findings of the study relating to Madison Square into effect. PB Min 11/12/96 7 Iq Public Hearing was closed. Mr. Basu stated that the subject area is not a "traditional downtown ", but is a residential area. Mr. Basu opined that while mixed -use development is desirable, it may be preferable for the City to make residential uses the emphasis in the subject area, with a lesser emphasis on retail and office uses. In response to Mr. Basu's concerns involving concurrency issues, Mr. Oravec responded that in regard to water and sewer categories, retail represents the most intensive use. Mr. Oravec noted that an "order of magnitude" exists with regard to rating usage. Ms. Dupree stated that it would be preferable for the City to continue to emphasize mixed -use development, with less of a significance placed on residential uses. Ms. Dupree added that with less of an emphasis on residential uses, the area under consideration would contain a "downtown" feel, which would provide Madison Square with a nucleus and an identity for the community. During discussion of heights that may be permitted in the Madison Square area, Mr. Illas stated that he may not be in favor of having 4 -story structures, as they may be too "drastic" of a change for a residential area. Ms. Dupree responded that this particular area needs a drastic change. Mr. Basu added that while zoning may permit 4 -story structures, such buildings may not necessarily be built. Mr. Mackey suggested that the amendment be drafted as proposed for the Board's further consideration at a future public hearing. The Board concurred that this would be appropriate at the present time. Charrette Too Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment: The Board now continued with consideration of Amendment II, Charrette Too Mixed Land Use Amendment. Mr. Mackey explained that this amendment would designate mixed -uses, such as along SW 62 Avenue. Public hearing was opened. Mr. Michael Miller, business owner, spoke before the Board. Mr. Miller stated that, with this amendment, the City has the opportunity to change the "face" of SW 62 Avenue by erecting buildings and structures that the community can be proud of and pleased with. Mr. Miller urged support of the amendment, in order to make a difference for the avenue. Mr. David Tucker Sr., of 6556 SW 78 Terrace, approached the Board. Mr. Tucker referred to both Charrette I and Charrette II by explaining that one builds upon the other, in order to effect change and to create potential in the City. Mr. Tucker stated that the time has arrived to act "in good faith" upon what it is the City has studied and determined from its charrettes. Mr. Christopher Cooke - Yarborough, Chairperson of the City's ERPB, spoke before the Board. Mr. Cooke - Yarborough characterized the SW 62 Avenue corridor as a "no man's land" and he asked that future buildings, particularly if multi -story in nature, be built to accommodate mixed - uses. PB Min 11/12/96 8 Iq Public Hearing was closed. Following the close of the public hearing, Mr. Mackey clarified the areas of the City covered by the amendment, including the west side of SW 62 Avenue, south of the area designated for multi- family uses, and remaining portions not included in the TODD. Mr. Mackey added that the amendment reflects Charrette II suggestions for Paul Tevis Drive and SW 70 and 71 Streets. Mr. Mackey noted that the amendment will allow for in -fill development to occur in these areas. Mr. Basu stated that the building of multi -story structures abutting single - family residences is "problematic" for the City. Mr. Basu further stated that this concern, as well as any other concerns involving this amendment, will have to be addressed at a later date. Mr. Mackey suggested that the amendment be drafted as proposed for the Board's further consideration at a future public hearing. The Board concurred that this would be appropriate at the present time. Mr. Mackey asked that the Board now continue with a non - agenda item, as those members of the public seeking changes to the Comprehensive Plan are encouraged to speak and to provide input at this workshop. 6550 SW 53 Terrace Item: Mr. Soltz clarified that this item is not currently formulated as an amendment, which has been the case of those items heard thus far under PB -96 -022. Mr. Soltz reiterated that those members of the public seeking changes in the Plan are encouraged and welcomed to speak at this workshop. Mr. Soltz added that the Board, following this portion of the workshop, would then provide direction to staff regarding formalizing a specific proposal, if it so desired. Mr. Ernesto Medina, attorney, signed in to represent the owner of the subject property, Ms. Augusta Price. Mr. Medina explained that this item involves seeking a change in designation for the property from single- family use to multi - family use, which would permit the construction of approximately five townhouses. In regard to Mr. Illas' inquiry, Mr. Medina responded that the overall purpose for the change would be general improvement of the property. Mr. Medina confirmed that the intention is to eventually build multi - family units, i.e., approximately five townhouses, at the subject property Following discussion of the parcel's size and the City's zoning involved in the item, Ms. Thorner stated that she would be opposed to proceeding with the matter at this time. Mr. Illas concurred that it may be "difficult" for the Board to consider approval if the item were to be reviewed further. Marshall Williamson Park Re- Configuration Amendment: The Board now continued with consideration of Amendment III, Marshall Williamson Park Re- Configuration Amendment. Mr. Mackey explained that this amendment has been formulated from Charrette II studies. Mr. Mackey noted that a portion at the northern part of the reconfiguration contains a parcel that is currently zoned single - family in nature. Public hearing was opened. PB Min 11/12/96 9 Mr. David Tucker Sr., of 6556 SW 78 Terrace, approached the Board. Mr. Tucker explained that this amendment represents another unique opportunity for the City. He said that this is the City's chance to improve the park itself and to redevelop the immediate area. In regard to Mr. Basu's question involving a property at the northwest of an existing cul -de -sac, Mr. Mackey responded that the particular property contains a day care center and is currently zoned as a commercial use. Mr. Basu inquired as to a proposed ROW. Mr. Mackey responded that the proposal is a part of the Charrette II process, in order that the area would be "opened up» Mr. Mackey confirmed that private property, involving one lot, may be re- designated. Mr. Mackey also confirmed that a ROW is planned at that property. W. Mackey noted that this matter concerning the property simply involves future planning at this point. Park View Townhouses Land Use Amendment: Mr. Mackey opened consideration of this amendment by confirming that the townhouses do not exist at the present time. Mr. Mackey clarified that the goal is to provide for the erection of privately -owned townhouses at a future date. Mr. David Tucker Sr., of 6556 SW 78 Terrace, approached the Board. Mr. Tucker stated that this amendment represents all "eyes on the streets" theme that had been expressed at the Charrette II. Mr. Tucker asked the City to be cautious with regard to appearance and spacing in future cluster developments involving townhouses. Community Center Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment: Mr. Mackey explained that this amendment provides for the City's community center at SW 58 Place and 68 Street. Mr. Mackey noted that the amendment is in response to ideas expressed during Charrette II. Hometown District Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment: Mr. Mackey explained that this amendment covers the southern portion of the Hometown District which is not designated for mixed use, including such areas that are currently zoned as RO and NR. Mr. Mackey further explained that this amendment covers the entire subject area, providing for four - story, mixed -use and residential use, to include those areas not previously designated in the Hometown Plan. Multi- Family Singular Designation Land Use Amendment: Mr. Mackey stated that this amendment provides for the simplification of the number of land use designations in the City. Mr. Mackey explained that a single designation for multi- family land use would result from this amendment. Following consideration of Amendment VII, the Board affirmed by a unanimous vote to continue the workshop portion at the next regular meeting, currently scheduled for November 26, 1996. PB Min 11/12/96 10 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES FROM NOVEMBER 269 1996 /y ITEM: PB -96 -022 (Continued) Applicant: Local Planning Agency Request: PUBLIC WORKSHOP MEETING REGARDING 17 PROPOSED EAR- RELATED COMPREHENSIVEPLAN AMENDMENTS. Items for Review at this Planning Board Public Workshop Meeting Will Include: IX. South Miami Hospital Land Use Amendment X. South Miami Shopping Center Land Use Amendment XI. South Miami Middle School Correction Amendment XII. Ludlam Office Land Use Replacement Amendment XIII. Girl Scout Park Correction Amendment XIV. Little Park Correction Amendment XV. Red Road Residential Office Correction Amendment XVI. Ear -Based Comprehensive Plan Language Amendments XVII. Ear -Based Transportation Element Amendment The workshop will allow time for discussion among Planning Board members, acting as the Local Planning Agency, members of Planning & Zoning Division staff and the general public. The workshop meeting agenda will allow time for the following: 1. Presentation of research and materials from the planning staff; 2. Public discussion of concerns and comments; and, 3. Discussion on the topics raised during the staff presentation and the public input. Mr. Basu opened by clarifying that this portion of the meeting involves the continuation of the public workshop from November 12, 1996. Staff asked that the workshop portion begin with consideration of Amendment XIII, Girl Scout Park Correction Amendment. Girl Scout Park Correction Amendment: Mr. Mackey explained that Amendment XIII would be for the correction of a graphical error from the 1989 adopted Comprehensive Land Use Plan relating to the northern border of the park, which had been incorrectly indicated on the document. Public hearing was opened. Mr. Christopher Cooke - Yarborough, of 6802 SW 64 Avenue, spoke before the Board, however he did not sign in for the record. Mr. Cooke - Yarborough provided information for the Board's review, including a copy of a lease agreement existing between the City of South Miami and the Girl Scout Little House Corporation. Mr. Cooke - Yarborough urged the City to reconsider the agreement, particularly in regard to the annual sum paid to the City for rental of the property referenced in the document. Additionally, Mr. Cooke - Yarborough asked the City to take into consideration that the property is in an unkempt condition at the present time. Mr. David Tucker Sr., of 6556 SW 78 Terrace, signed in and spoke before the Board. Speaking in reference to the area under consideration, Mr. Tucker asked that all be done in accordance with the City's standards. Mr. Tucker stated that if the Girl Scouts is to be reminded of any value or neglect of the property via re- negotiation of the agreement, that the City "walk tenderly" in doing so. PB Min 11/26/96 3 Public hearing was closed. Mr. Mackey stated that the Girl Scout park is the sole parcel in the City designated as a natural forest community by the Department of Environmental Resource Management (DERM). Mr. Mackey commented that the area is to be protected and is meant to be retained in a natural state. In response to Mr. Basu's inquiry regarding Girl Scout usage and public accessibility, Mr. Mackey clarified that this, in conjunction with the lease agreement, would not be an issue at this time. Little Park Correction Amendment: Mr. Mackey explained that Amendment XIV is in reference to a lot located in a subdivision called Sunset Circle. Mr. Mackey added that there is no longer an interest to designate the property a park. Mr. Illas stated that, as one of the property owners involved, he could clarify ownership of the subject lot as that of "undivided interest" in the land. Mr. Illas explained that the subject property has served as a park, indicating the owners' desires to maintain the property in an undeveloped state. Public hearing was opened. Mr. Terry Miller, of 7020 SW 68 Court, signed in and spoke before the Board. Mr. Miller stated that the parcel in question is private property and that he is one of the owners of this property. Mr. Miller related his concern that the property will become part of the City's park system and stated his desire that the amendment be withdrawn from further consideration. Mr. Paul Eisenhart, of 7029 SW 68 Court, signed in to speak before the Board. Mr. Eisenhart emphasized that he is opposed to the amendment, stating that he would like for the parcel to remain zoned residential. Public hearing was closed. Mr. Illas gave background information relating to the area. Mr. Illas followed up on prior comments by stating that the subject parcel is private property and that the owners would like for it to remain and be maintained as private property. Mr. Illas stated that he believed the current designation is "more than satisfactory" and that he thought the amendment should be withdrawn from further consideration. EAR -Based Comprehensive Plan Language Amendments: Mr. Mackey explained that Amendment XVI involves new names and functions for future land use categories. Mr. Mackey gave examples of the language contained in the categories, including new language in the Single - Family Residential (Two- Story) category. PB Min 11/26/96 4 if Mr. Mackey continued by speaking in reference to the Townhouse Residential (Two- Story) category. Mr. Mackey stated that, as a result of the EAR process, parcels of land involved would be changed from 60,000 to 10,000 square feet in area and densities would be changed from 7260 to 2500 square feet of site area. Mr. Mackey added that allowing 2500 square feet, or 17 units per acre, may not provide an effective buffer for single- family residential dwellings. Public hearing was opened. Mr. Peter Goicouria signed in and spoke before the Board. Mr. Goicouria stated that he was present to speak in reference to 6600 Miller Drive. Mr. Goicouria noted that the current 60,000 square feet in area requirement severely limits him from developing his RT -6 zoned property. Mr. Goicouria stated that he is interested in developing the property at less density than the new language of 2500 square feet of site area would allow, but at a more liberal amount than what is currently permissible. Public hearing was closed. In response to Ms. Dupree's inquiry involving what, exactly may be built, Mr. Mackey responded that with the new 10,000 square feet in area language, four townhouses or one single - family residential unit may be built. In regard to Mr. Goicouria's comment of 7500 square feet, Mr. Mackey stated that such an amount would fall between the current language for RS -3 and RS -4 zoning. Following Mr. Illas' questions involving clarification of what amounts may be desirable and what may be built, Mr. Goicouria responded that he would be interested in doing a layout for the Miller Drive property. Mr. Goicouria.added that the new amounts, such as 2500 square feet of site area, would benefit him in his efforts to develop the subject property. Mr. Mackey followed by stating that he would meet with Mr. Goicouria to review his proposed layout for the property. Discussion ensued on what amounts to include in the new language, following which Mr. Mackey suggested that the 10,000 square feet in area proposal be included and the 7260 square feet of site area be added. Mr. Mackey noted that the 7260 figure would permit 6 units per acre as opposed to 17 units per acre permitted under the 2500 amount. Public hearing was reopened. Ms. Berta Goicouria signed in to speak before the Board. Ms. Goicouria stated that she is an owner of the property at 6600 Miller Drive. Ms. Goicouria followed up on comments of what amounts to include in the language that would be beneficial for development of the property. Ms. Goicouria stressed the importance of maintaining flexibility when considering amounts allowing for either single- family residences or townhouses. The Board and staff emphasized that any amounts considered must be weighed for impact citywide and not just for the Miller Drive property. Mr. Illas stated his belief that a trend toward PB Min 11/26/96 5 rI smaller lots changes the character of the City. Mr. Illas further stated that he believed the 10,000 square feet in area is a minimum requirement for single - family residential units. Ms. Thorner opined that, with this amendment, an increase in density will begin to occur in South Miami. Ms. Thorner stated that such an increase, if it were to occur, would make her "uncomfortable ". Mr. David Tucker Sr., of 6556 SW 78 Terrace, spoke before the Board. Mr. Tucker commented that in a study of a matter such as this, it is vital to be mindful of areas adjoining a property, as well as bordering on the periphery, in order to consider the property within the framework of the entire community. Public hearing was closed. Following the close of the public hearing portion, W. Basu stated that is it necessary to begin "rethinking" the nature of development, particularly with respect to the urban /suburban sprawl that has evolved. Mr. Basu summarized the latest issue involving this amendment as one of establishing flexibility between townhouses and large, single - family units. Mr. Basu stated that he would be in favor of producing and maintaining such flexibility. Ms. Thorner urged the City to consider very carefully the placing of a greater number of people onto a smaller area of land. Mr. Basu commented that what is being contemplated at the present time may be characterized as "medium density ". During discussion of varying densities and the impact they have upon South Miami, particularly with respect to townhouse development, Mr. Mackey stated that it is the City's desire to have and retain one townhouse designation. (Ms. Dupree departed the meeting at this time, 9:05 p.m.) Mr. Mackey continued with the presentation of Amendment XVI, highlighting language contained in future land us categories, including Multi- Family Residential, Residential Office (Two- Story), Commercial Retail and Office (Two - Story), etc. Mr. Mackey noted that land use categories are being deleted from use, including Low Intensity Office (Two- Story), Medium Intensity Office (Four- Story), Hospital /Office (Four - Story), etc. South Miami Hospital Land Use Amendment: Mr. Mackey noted that Amendment IX recognizes the expansion of the South Miami Hospital campus, as the hospital has acquired two buildings. South Miami Shopping Center Land Use Amendment: Mr. Mackey explained that Amendment X involves designating an entire parcel a single category, particularly with respect to the rear parking lot of the South Miami Shopping Center which is categorized at Residential Office. Mr. Mackey noted that, in effect, this reduces a situation of having one parcel carrying two land use designations. PB Min 11/26/96 6 Ms. Zeller stated that she would like to see the Residential Office designation continue, as it provides buffering between the residential units and the shopping center. Mr. Basu suggested that the City may wish to re- designate the parking lot area Townhouse Residential (Two- Story), as opposed to continuation of the Residential Office category. South Miami Middle School Correction Amendment: Mr. Mackey explained that Amendment XI involves designating an entire parcel to accurately reflect the uses on the properties that currently comprise South Miami Middle School. Ludlam Office Land Use Replacement Amendment: Mr. Mackey explained that Amendment XII would change the property's designation from LO to RO, as the LO category is being deleted from use. Red Road Residential Office Correction Amendment: Mr. Mackey noted that Amendment XV reflects efforts to reduce the number of properties containing split categories, recognizing the parking lot areas involved as Residential Office. EAR -Based Transportation Element Amendment: Mr. Mackey explained that Amendment XVIII would recognize the need to prepare a Transportation Element in order to replace the existing Traffic Circulation and to comply with Florida law. Item Reviewed at prior Planning Board Public Workshop Meeting: Marshall Williamson Park Re- Configuration Amendment: Mr. Mackey asked for the Board's latest input involving Amendment III, particularly concerning the existing structure, which had been reviewed at the first workshop meeting. The Board and staff concurred that the City would proceed with the amendment as currently stated and thereby acquire the existing structure. PB Min 11/26/96 7 11 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES FROM DECEMBER 109 1996 Iq ITEM: PB -96 -024 Applicant: Local Planning Agency Request: A PUBLIC HEARINGREGARDINGTHE 17 PROPOSED EAR - RELATED COwREHENSIVEPLAN AMENDMENTS. Items for Review at this Planning Board Public Hearing Will Include: I. Madison Square Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment II. Charrette Too Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment III. Marshall Williamson Park Re- Configuration Amendment IV. Park View Townhouses Land Use Amendment V. Community Center Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment VI. Hometown District Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment VII. Multi- Family Singular Designation Land Use Amendment VIII -a Jean H. Willis Park Preservation Land Use Amendment VIII -b Jean H. Willis Park Preservation & Sylva G. Martin Park Designation Amendment IX. South Miami Hospital Land Use Amendment X. South Miami Shopping Center Land Use Amendment XI. South Miami Middle School Correction Amendment XII. Ludlam Office Land Use Replacement Amendment XIII. Girl Scout Park Correction Amendment XIV. Little Park Correction Amendment (staff recommends that this item be withdrawn) XV. Red Road Residential Office Correction Amendment XVI. Ear -Based Comprehensive Plan Language Amendments XVII. Ear -Based Transportation Element Amendment The Public Hearing will allow time for discussion among Planning Board members, acting as the Local Planning Agency, members of Planning & Zoning Division staff and the general public. The Public Hearing meeting agenda will allow time for the following: 1. Presentation of research and materials from the planning staff; 2. Public discussion of concerns and comments; and, 3. Discussion on the topics raised during the staff presentation and the public input. Ms. Zeller read the request. Staff explained that this portion of the meeting would begin with consideration of Amendment I, Madison Square Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment. Madison Square Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment Mr. Mackey stated that this amendment is designed to encourage redevelopment and a neighborhood center in the vicinity of SW 59 Place and 64 Street. Public hearing was opened. PB Min 12/10/96 6 ry Mr. Lee Perry, of 6221 SW 62 Terrace, signed in and spoke before the Board. Mr. Perry stated that his concerns involved extension of mixed uses in the neighborhood; future status of buildings in the area; parking limitations and problems in the vicinity; and possible erection of a four -story building adjacent or nearby to St. John's AME Church at 6461 SW 59 Place. Mr. David Tucker Sr., of 6556 SW 78 Terrace, signed in to speak before the Board. Mr. Tucker related historical and background information, including 1994's Charrette II process, concerning the Madison Square area. Mr. Tucker stated his belief that this particular amendment is something that attracts attention for its possibilities. Public hearing was closed. Motion: Ms. Thorner moved approval of the amendment, as stated. Ms. Dupree seconded the motion. Vote: Approved:5 Opposed:0 Charrette Too Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment Mr. Mackey stated that this amendment addresses concerns raised during the Charrette II process. Mr. Mackey noted that mixed uses, including residential, office, and retail, limited to four stories in height, would be permitted in the area of the amendment. Public hearing was opened. Mr. Michael Miller, of 6796 SW 62 Avenue, signed in and spoke before the Board. Mr. Miller stated that he believed the amendment would promote investment and growth in the area of the amendment, such as the SW 62 Avenue corridor. He encouraged the Board to vote in favor of the amendment, in order to allow four stories and mixed -uses along SW 62 Avenue, for example. Mr. David Tucker Sr., of 6556 SW 78 Terrace, approached the Board. Mr. Tucker opined that this amendment presents a unique opportunity for development. He asked that the City carefully consider exactly what kind of development will occur, particularly in relation to its effect on the community. Mr. Alan Dale Mobley, of 1390 S Dixie Highway, signed in and spoke before the Board. Mr. Mobley stated that from his perspective as a participant in the Charrette II process, he "fully supports" the City's efforts, such as this amendment, to attract and encourage new development for existing vacant land. He urged the Board to support the amendment in conjunction with other efforts, such as the Transportation Oriented Development District (TODD), designed to promote growth and development in South Miami. Mr. Patrick Fiorntino spoke before the Board, however he did not sign in for the record. Mr. Fiorentino stated that he endorsed the amendment as presently conceptualized. He added that the City will need to follow up on the amendment by including incentives, such as with tax breaks or abatements, to fuel future growth and development. PB Min 12/10/96 7 r Public hearing was closed. Motion: Mr. Illas moved approval of the amendment, as stated. Ms. Zeller seconded the motion. Mr. Basu stated for the record that, in regard to this amendment, the City will need to ensure adequate buffering occurs involving residential properties. The Board then voted on the matter as follows: Vote: Approved:5 Opposed:0 Hometown District Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment Mr. Mackey noted that this amendment would provide for four - story, mixed -use and residential use, not previously designated in the Hometown Plan. Public hearing was opened. Mr. Robert Hutcheson, architect, signed in and spoke before the Board. Mr. Hutcheson stated that he supported the amendment, in that it is most logical for future mixed -use in the Hometown District. Public hearing was closed. Motion: Ms. Zeller moved approval of the amendment, as stated. Ms. Dupree seconded the motion. Vote: Approved:5 Opposed:0 Jean H. Willis Park Preservation Land Use Amendment Jean H. Willis Park Preservation & Sylva G. Martin Park Designation Amendment Mr. Mackey explained and differentiated the amendments, particularly in regard to concerns raised at the Planning Board meeting held on November 12, 1996 involving possible relocation of the Jean H. Willis Park. Public hearing was opened. Ms. Ann Bass, former City Commissioner, signed in and spoke before the Board. Ms. Bass stated that she and her mother, Ms. Jean Willis, also a former City Commissioner and for whom the park is named, both fully support the Jean H. Willis Park Preservation & Sylva G. Martin Park Designation Amendment as a way to continue to beautify the City. Ms. Doris Rosebraugh, of 7511 SW 64 Court, stated that she was serving as a representative for the Tropical Flowering Tree Society. She stated that the Society fully supports the preservation of the Jean H. Willis Park at its current location on SW 61 Court. PB Min 12/10/96 Public hearing was closed. Motion: Mr. Illas moved approval of the Jean H. Willis Park Preservation & Sylva G. Martin Park Designation Amendment, as stated. Ms. Dupree seconded the motion. Vote: Approved:5 Opposed:0 South Miami Shopping Center Land Use Amendment Mr. Mackey noted the change to the "Townhouse" designation for the center's rear parking lot, particularly in regard to the suggestion proffered at the Planning Board meeting held on November 26, 1996. Public hearing was opened. Ms. Barbara Jaskewicz, of 6225 SW 78 Street, signed in and spoke before the Board. Ms. Jaskewicz stated that she was in favor of the suggested change to the townhouse designation for the parking lot, in order to ensure adequate buffering between the residential units and the shopping center. Ms. Linda Reynolds, of 6221 SW 78 Street, signed in to speak before the Board. Ms. Reynolds stated that she, too, was in favor of the townhouse designation for the parking lot. Public hearing was closed. Motion: Ms. Dupree moved approval of the amendment, as stated. Mr. Illas seconded the motion. Vote: Approved:5 Opposed:0 Ludlam Office Land Use Replacement Amendment Mr. Mackey noted that a single property is being impacted by a change in a land use category, particularly in regard to permitting less development on the subject property if the existing structure were to be replaced. Public hearing was opened. Mr. Wayne Vensel signed in to speak in reference to property located on Sunset Drive. Mr. Vensel stated that his concern involved ensuring that the City does not prohibit the replacing of what is currently existing, such as in the event of a natural disaster. Public hearing was closed. In response to an inquiry from Mr. Illas, Mr. Mackey confirmed that the existing "LO" designation is being deleted from use. PB Min 12/10/96 9 Motion: Ms. Dupree moved approval of the amendment, as stated. Ms. Zeller seconded the motion. Vote: Approved:5 Opposed:0 EAR -Based Comprehensive Plan Language Amendments, V consideration Mr. Mackey explained that he had met with Mr. Peter Goicouria in response to recommendations made at the Planning Board meeting held on November 26, 1996 regarding this item Mr. Mackey stated that he had discussed with Mr. Goicouria potential site plans for the property at 6600 Miller Drive and, as a result, a range of developing perhaps three single- family units, or seven townhouse units, had materialized. Mr. Mackey suggested that the Board consider the adoption of a minimum lot size of 6000 square feet, the current requirement for single- family residential in the City's RS -4 zoning district. Mr. Mackey further suggested that the Board consider the adoption of a requirement for a 15,000 square feet minimum lot size. Public hearing was opened. Mr. Peter Goicouria signed in to speak in reference to the property located on Miller Drive. Mr. Goicouria confirmed that he had met with Mr. Mackey, and he stated that he would not object to the 6000 square -foot requirement. Mr. Goicouria reiterated voting in favor of the amendment. Public hearing was closed. Motion: Ms. Dupree moved approval of the amendment, as stated. Mr. Basu seconded the motion. Vote: Motion failed. Approved: 2 Opposed: 3 (Ms. Zeller) (Ms. Thorner) (Mr. Illas) Staff clarified that the Board may recommend an alternative that would carry Planning Board's approval or permit the amendment to proceed to the City Commission with the Planning Board's disapproval. Staff continued by clarifying that the proposed language contained in the amendment states 10,000 square feet in area for parcels of land and 7260 square feet of area for site size. Second motion: Mr. Illas moved approval of the amendment, as stated. Ms. Thorner seconded the motion. Upon further discussion of the language contained in the amendment, the second motion was withdrawn from the floor and no vote was taken. The Board continued by discussing the PB Min 12/10/96 10 14 language contained in the Multiple- Family Residential (Four - Story) category, following which the Board proceeded to hear the 6550 SW 53 Terrace Item. 6550 SW 53 Terrace Item Mr. Mackey noted that this particular item is not included on tonight's agenda. Mr. Mackey reiterated that those members of the public seeking changes in the Plan are welcomed to speak at this meeting. Public hearing was opened. Ms. Augusta Price signed in and spoke in reference to 6550 SW 53 Terrace. Ms. Price opined that the inclusion of nice, well -built townhouses in the vicinity would enhance the neighborhood. Public hearing was closed. Following the hearing conducted on the 6550 SW 53 Terrace Item, for which no formal action was taken by the Board, Mr. Mackey suggested that the Board now proceed to take action on Amendments III, IV, V, VII, IX, XI, XIII, XIV, XV, and XVII. Mr. Illas wished to state for the record that he had a financial interest in amendment number XIV, Little Park Correction Amendment. The Board proceeded to hear Amendment V, Community Center Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment. Community Center Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment Public hearing was opened. Mr. Alan Dale Mobley spoke before the Board. Mr. Mobley stated that he wished to convey to the Board the City's desire to establish the community center, as indicated in the Charrette II process. Public hearing was closed. Mr. Basu asked that the Board now proceed to take action on Amendments III, IV, V, VII, IX, XI, XIII, XV, and XVII. Motion: Ms. Zeller moved approval of Amendments III, IV, V, VII, IX, XI, XIII, XV, and XVII, as stated. Ms. Thorner seconded the motion. Vote: Approved:5 Opposed:0 Following the taking of the vote, the Board proceeded with Amendment XIV, Little Park Correction Amendment. PB Min 12/10/96 11 / Little Park Correction Amendment The Board followed up on staff's recommendation to withdraw this amendment from consideration, which was heard by the Planning Board at its meeting on November 26, 1996. Motion: Ms. Zeller moved approval to withdraw the amendment and to renumber subsequent amendments, as recommended by staff. Ms. Dupree seconded the motion. Vote: Approved:5 Opposed:0 Following the taking of the vote, the Board returned to its earlier consideration of EAR -Based Comprehensive Plan Language Amendments, now Amendment XV. EAR -Based Comprehensive Plan Language Amendments, 2"d consideration The Board discussed at length the language contained in this amendment. Mr. Illas stated his concern regarding the precedent that the City may be setting with the language contained in the Multiple- Family Residential (Four- Story) category, including an allowance for 24 dwelling unites per net acre. Mr. Mackey suggested that the Board may wish to consider the adoption of the amendment without language for the Townhouse Residential (Two- Story) and Multiple- Family Residential (Four- Story) categories. Third motion: Ms. Dupree moved approval of the amendment without the language for the Townhouse Residential (Two- Story) and Multiple- Family Residential (Four- Story) categories. Ms. Thorner seconded the motion. Vote: Approved:2 Opposed:3 (Mr. Basu) (Ms. Zeller) (Mr. Illas) The third motion failed. Fourth motion: Mr. Basu moved approval of the amendment and disapproval of the language contained in the Multiple- Family Residential (Four- Story) category. Ms. Thorner seconded the motion. Vote: Approved:4 Opposed:I (Ms. Dupree) PB Min 12/10/96 12 14 CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED REGARDING PROPOSED AMENDMENTS STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT • HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT LAWTON CHILES Governor April 9, 1997 The Honorable Julio Robaina, Vice Mayor, City of South Miami 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida 33143 r Dear Vice Mayor Robaina:' JAMES L, MURLEY Secretary APR 1 1, ,997 The Department of Community Affairs (Department) has completed its review of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the City of South Miami (DCA No. 97-1 ER), which was received on February 3, 1997. Copies of the proposed amendment have been distributed to appropriate state, regional and local agencies for their review and their comments are enclosed. I am enclosing the Department's Objections, Recommendations and Comments (ORC) Report, issued pursuant to Rule 9J- 11.010, Florida Administrative Code (FAC). The issues identified in this ORC Report include deficiencies with the City's new Transportation Element, newly created Mixed Use land use category, and Housing Element. The Department recognizes the City's past efforts to implement innovative planning techniques such as the transit oriented development district (TODD) and the redevelopment infill district (RID). We believe that the Department's objections will further the City's efforts to successfully implement these techniques. Where possible, the Department has attempted to provide the City with sources of data and analysis, as available, to facilitate the City in addressing the Department's objections and recommendations. It is very important that the adopted plan amendment address these issues and all of the objections in the Department's ORC Report. Upon receipt of this letter, the City of South Miami has 120 days in which to adopt, adopt with changes, or determine that the City will not adopt the proposed amendment. The process for adoption of local government comprehensive plan amendments is outlined in s. 163.3184, Florida Statutes (F.S.), and Rule 9J- 11.011, FAC. The City must ensure that all ordinances adopting comprehensive plan amendments are consistent with the effective date provisions of 2 5 5 5 S H U M A R D O A K B O U L E V A R D • TALLAHASSEE, PI O R I D A 3 2 3 9 9 - 2 1 00 FLORIDA KEYS AREA OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN SOUTH FLORIDA RECOVERY OFFICE GREEN SWAMP AREA OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE P.0 Box 4022 FIELD OFFICE 2796 Overseas Highway, Suite 212 9600 N W. 361h Street 155 Earl Summerlin Marathon, Florida 33050 -2227 Miami, Flnrida 11159-4022 Now, Florida 11910 -41,41 Mr. Julio Robaina April 9, 1997 Page Two Chapter 163, F.S. A summary of the new effective date provisions are included as an attachment to this letter. Within ten working days of the date of adoption, the City of South Miami must submit the following to the Department: Three copies of the adopted comprehensive plan amendments; • copy of the adoption ordinance; • listing of additional changes not previously reviewed; • listing of findings by the local governing body, if any, which were not included in the ordinance; and A statement indicating the relationship of the additional changes to the Department's Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report. The above amendment and documentation are required for the Department to conduct a compliance review, make a compliance determination and issue the appropriate notice of intent. In order to expedite the regional planning council's review of the amendments, and pursuant to Rule 9J- 11.011(5), FAC, please provide a copy of the adopted amendment directly to the Executive Director of the South Florida Regional Planning Council. Please contact Mike McDaniel, Growth Management Administrator, Ken Metcalf, Community Program Administrator or Jan Brandt, Planner, at (904) 487 -4545 if we can be of assistance as you formulate your response to this Report. Sincerely, J. Thomas Beck, Chief Bureau of Local Planning JTB /jb Enclosures: Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report Review Agency Comments Effective Date Language cc: Mr.Bill Mackey, Planing Director, City of South Miami Ms. Carolyn Deckle, Executive Director, South Florida Regional Planning Council Mr. Guillermo Olmedillo, Director, Metro -Dade Planning �y Effective Date Language for Adopted Amendments Section 163.3189(2)(a), F.S. The City /Town/County must ensure that all ordinances adopting comprehensive plan amendments are consistent with the provisions of Section 163.3189(2)(a), F.S. Therefore, the Department recommends that the City/Town/County include the following language in the adoption ordinances: "The effective date of this plan amendment shall be the date a final order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or Administration Commission finding the amendment in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes." The Department's notice of intent to find a plan amendment in compliance shall be deemed to be a final order if no timely petition challenging the amendment is filed. Any affected person, may file a petition with the agency within 21 days after the publication of the notice of intent pursuant to Section 163.3184(9), F.S. No development orders, permits a development dependent on the amendment may be issued or commence before the plan amendment takes effect. ly OBJECTIONS RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI AMENDMENT 97 -IER Iq OBJECTIONS RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI AMENDMENT 97 -IER Amendment #16: Transportation Element: Rule 9J -5.019 was revised to require a new Transportation Element to integrate multimodal transportation systems. The City has combined the existing Traffic Circulation and Mass Transit Elements into one new Transportation Element. The consolidation of these elements does not meet the minimum requirements for the Transportation Element as required by Rule 9J- 5.019, F.A.C. While most of the existing data is applicable to the new transportation element, the existing data and analysis is insufficient to satisfy the completely new requirements. Specifically, the Data and Analysis section does not include sufficient analysis of land use /transportation coordination, multimodal connections and consideration of various FLUM alternatives. Furthermore, the Goals, Objectives and Policy section of the new element also does not reflect the new requirements for land use /transportation coordination. The Department believes that the objections are relevant to the City for a number of reasons. Primarily, the response to these objections will help the City to promote the goals of the City's Redevelopment Infill District (RID) and the Transit Oriented Development District (TODD). As the RID and TODD aim to promote redevelopment and alternative forms of transportation, the transportation element is a beneficial tool by which the City can meet its goals. Furthermore, the City has a Metrorail Stop and a number of bus routes which create a multimodal transportation network. Therefore, the Department recommends that the City address the following Rules which are insufficiently addressed by the proposed amendment: ORC Objection: The proposed Transportation Element does not include the following data and analysis requirements of Rule 9J -5.019 (2) and (3): 1. (2)(a)Ld. significant parking facilities; 2. (2)(a)7. intermodal terminals and access to intermodal facilities; 3. (2)(a)10. the major public transit trip generators and attractors based upon the existing land use map or map series; 4. (3)(d) an analysis of the growth trends and travel patterns and interactions; between land uses and transportation, the compatibility between the future land use and transportation element; 5. (3)(e) an analysis of the projected intermodal deficiencies and needs such as terminals, connections, high occupancy vehicle lanes, park- and -ride lots and other facilities; 6. (3) (f) an analysis of projected transportation system needs; 7. (3)(g) an analysis of the compatibility of the transportation system needs with the FDOT Adopted Work Program, long range transportation plan and plans 1 of the MPO, and the compatibility with the policies and guidelines of these plans; 8. (3)(h) an analysis shall demonstrate how the local government will maintain its adopted level of service standards for roads and transit facilities; and 9. (3)(I) the analysis shall explicitly address and document internal consistency; The Goals, Objectives and Policies have not been sufficiently updated to address the transportation system as a multimodal, integrated system and to address coordination of land uses and transportation; therefore, objectives have not been included to address: 10. (4)(b)4. provide transit services based on generators /attractors; 11. (4)(c)3. establish parking strategies to promote transportation goals /objectives; 12. (4)(c)7. establish TSM strategies to improve system efficiency and enhance safety; 13. (4)(c)9. establish land use, site and building design guidelines for accessability to transit facilities; 14. (4)(c)10. establish numerical indicators to measure achievement of mobility goals; and 15. (4)(c) 11. coordinate with other local governments for areawide transportation coordination. The following Rules are insufficiently addressed by the Goals, Objectives and Policies: 16. (4)(b)2. coordinate transportation system with FLUM; Objective 1.2 does not adequately address this rule. The Objective should include language to insure that future land use, population densities, housing and employment patterns are consistent with the area's transportation modes and services based on analysis of FLUM alternatives. 17. (4)(c)l. establish level of service standards at peak hour for roads and transit facilities; Policy 1.1.1: Policy language should include specific reference to level of service for transit facilities. Furthermore, the local government shall adopt the level of service standards established by the FDOT for facilities on the Florida Intrastate Highway System. In addition, the City is proposing a TCEA for which the City has not adequately addressed the provision to establish policies which specify programs to address transportation needs within the TCEA. The Department believes that, if the City adds the above mentioned citations the -requirements of the TCEA will be met pursuant to Rule 9J- 5.0055(6)(c), F.A.C. The Future Transportation Map does not include: 18. (5)(a)l.e. - parking facilities that are required to achieve mobility goals; 19. (5)(a)4. - TCEA, as proposed; and 20. (5)(a)9. - intermodal terminals and access to such facilities. Recommendation: The Transportation Element should be revised to address the new requirements and provide specific objectives and implementing policies to integrate the transportation system and land uses as a multimodal system. Much of the Data and Analysis can be obtained through the Dade County MVO and Dade County. Items 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 are already, or will be available through Dade County Planning, the Dade County Metropolitan Planing Organization, the Metro -Dade Transit Agency, or the Florida Department of Transportation, although the data inventory maintained by the City should already include the parking, terminal connections, and major attractors /generators. Regarding item 4, the MPO/Dade County can provide modeling results that address existing growth trends, trave; patterns and land use/ transportation alternatives. For the remainder of item 4, related to the compatibility between the FLUM and the Transportation Element, as well as items 5, 6, and 8, which are all dependent on alternative land use strategies, the analyses must be developed in coordination with the MPO and Dade County. For these items the City should consider various land use alternatives, particularly within the TODD and RID where multimodal interaction occurs. This land use information should be provided to the MPO for inclusion in the Dade County MPO Long Range Transportation Plan Model (MPOLRTPM) to determine if alternative land uses would affect the transportation system. Items 10 -15, and 17 should be addressed at this time in conjunction with the MPO and subsequently refined in 1998 following the MPOLRTP. For item 16, were the City anticipates data to become available at a later date, such as data updated in the 1998 update to the Dade County MPOLRTP, the Department recommends that the City adopt Objectives and Policies which commit to an update of the City's Plan at such a time when the specific information becomes available. Comments: Page 69, Objective 1.6: This objective states that by 1996 the City will establish a transportation concurrency management area (TCMA) in conjunction with the approved Metro -Dade County transportation concurrency management area located east of the Palmetto Expressway. However, this area is defined as a transportation concurrency exception area (TCEA) pursuant to Section 163.3180(5), F.S. A transportation concurrency management area has a different meaning as defined by Section 163.3180(7), F.S. Should the City desire to designate a TCEA, then the word `management' in Objective 1.6 should be changed to `exception'. Future Traffic Circulation Map: Dade County is concerned that this map designates SW 56 Street and SW 67 Ave within the City as County Collector roadways. The Metro -Dade Comp Plan Traffic Circulation Element designates both roadways as County Minor Arterials. The City should redesignate the SW 56 Street and SW 67 Avenue to be consistent with the Metro -Dade County CDMP. Future land Use Element: Iq ORC Objection: Page 65, Future Land Use Categories: The amendment proposes to include Mixed Use Commercial/Residential as a new land use classification. The following language is proposed: , fi The Mixed Use Commercial /Residential (four story) land use category is intended to provide for different levels of retail uses, office uses, retail and office services, and residential dwelling units with an emphasis on mixed use development that is characteristic of traditional downtowns. Permitted heights and intensities shall be set forth in the Land Development Code. Regulations regarding the permitted height, density and intensity in zoning districts for areas designated as mixed -use commercial/residential shall provide incentives for transit oriented development and mixed use development. Zoning regulations shall reinforce "no widening" policy set forth in the Traffic Circulation Element by encouraging use of the Metrorail system. The Mixed Use category is intended to promote the development of large projects by providing maximum opportunity for innovative site planning for living, shopping and working environments. While the Department encourages the use of Mixed -Use land use categories, Rule 9J- 5,006(4)(c), F.A.C. requires that the land use classification include the percentages of land use distribution among the mix of uses, and the density and intensity of each use. Furthermore, as per subsection 9J- 5.006(1)(c) and (4)(c), F.A.C., no policies were included in the proposed amendment for the types of land uses allowed, the percentage distribution among the mix of uses and intensity of each use. Recommendation: The City needs to provide policies for the types of land uses allowed under the Mixed Use category, the maximum percentage distribution allowed, and the approximate acreage and intensity for each use. One method of establishing the intensity of use would be to incorporate FAR controls into the Mixed Use category. Housing Element: ORC Objection: The amendment did not include an affordable housing needs assessment for the very low, low and moderate income households as required by 9J- 5.010(2)(b), F.A.C. Recommendation: Include the newly published affordable housing data in the plan language. Subsequent to the study the City could add additional policies to their Housing Element as necessary. Amendments with Comments: Infrastructure Element: Comments: Page 73, proposed Policy 1. 1.4 Dade County's sanitary sewer level -of- service (LOS) standard does not provide for a fixed /`f per capita utilization rate. Therefore, it is recommended that the second sentence of Policy 1. 1.4 be deleted. Page 73, proposed Policy 1.2.1 This policy language does not reflect the City's interlocal agreement with Dade County for use of the County Solid Waste Management System for disposal capacity, and the City's reliance on the County's disposal level -of- service standard to meet concurrency. It is recommended that the language of Policy 1.2.1 be replaced in its entirety with the following: Pursuant to the City's interlocal agreement with Metropolitan Dade County for use of the County Solid Waste Management System, the County shall insure that the System, which includes County -owned solid waste disposal facilities and, those operated under contract with the County for disposal, for a minimum of five years, collectively maintain an amount of solid waste disposal capacity sufficient to accommodate waste flows committed to the System through long -term interlocal agreements or contracts with municipalities and private waste haulers, and anticipated non - committed waste flows. /Y METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA Mr. Ray Eubanks, Planning Manager Plan Review and DIU Processing Team Division of Resource Planning and Management Florida Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -2100 AMNRk I iArW ' STEPHEN P. CLARK CENTER DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND REGULATION 111 NW 1ST STREET SUITE 1110 MIAMI FLORIDA 33128 -1974 (305) 375 -2500 FAX (305) 375 -2795 March 13, 1997 Q RE: City of South Miami Proposed EAR-Based Comprehensive Plan Amendments, DCA Ref No. 97 -1ER Dear Mr. Eubanks: This Department has reviewed the referenced City of South Miami EAR-based Comprehensive Plan amendments which you transmitted to us on February 3, 1997. The transmittal package included proposed changes to each Plan element goals, objectives and policies and fourteen Future Land Use Plan Map amendment proposals. Our review is conducted primary to identify points of consistency or inconsistency with provisions of Dade County's Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP). With the exception of the comments and suggestions we have noted in the enclosure, this Department concludes that the City's proposed EAR-based amendments are generally consistent with the policies of the Metro-Dade County CDMP and would not significantly impair services provided by the County. Should you have questions regarding our comments, please contact Mark R Woerner, Planning Section Supervisor, Planning Division, at (305) 375 -2835. GEO:MRW:gm Enclosure: Comments and Suggestions if COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS OF THE METRO -DARE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND REGULATION ON THE PROPOSED CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE PLAN EAR -BASED AMENDMENTS TRANSMITTAL DRAFT JANUARY 10, 1997 MARCH 13, 1997 /y South Florida Regional Planning Council MEMORANDUM AGENDA ITEM #9g DATE: FEBRUARY 3,1997 TO. COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: STAFF SUBJECT: SOUTH MIAMI PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT Introduction On January 15,1997, Council staff received proposed amendment package #97 -1ER to the City of South Miami Comprehensive Plan for review of consistency with the Strategic Regional Policy PIan for South Florida. Staff review is undertaken pursuant to the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, Chapter 163, Part 11, Florida Statutes, and Rules 9J -5 and 9J -11, Florida Administrative Code. Summary of Staff Analysis Proposed amendment #97 - -1ER has been submitted in response to the recommendations contained in the City's Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). The City of South Miami Comprehensive Plan EAR was determined to be sufficient by the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) pursuant to Rule 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code on December 1, 1995. Proposed amendment package #97 -1ERP contains a total of 16 amendments which are based on the recommendations contained in the City's Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). Of these, fourteen are map amendments to the City of South Miami's Future Land Use Plan. The remaining two text amendments are proposed to update Comprehensive Plan language and comply with the Statutory requirement for a Transportation Element. A map identifying the City's boundaries is included in Attachment 1. The specific location of Amendments No. 1 - 14 are shown in Attachments 2 -15. Staff analysis confirms that no adverse regional impacts will result froth the proposed amendments. Recommendation Find proposed amendment package #97 -1ER to the City of South Miami Future Land Use Plan and Comprehensive PIan generally consistent with the Strategic Regional Policy Plan for South Florida. Approve this agenda item for transmittal to the Department of Community Affairs. 3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140, Hollywood, Florida 33021 ly Broward (305) 985 -4416, Area Codes 305 and 407 (800) 985 -4416 SunCom 473 -4416, FAX (305) 985 -4417, SunCom FAX 473 -4417 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review Staff Report forthe City of South Miami, Dade County South Florida Regional Planning Council February 1997 ly CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI PROPOSED LAND USE AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW Statutory Authori On January 15,1997, Council staff received proposed amendment package #97 -1ER to the City of South Miami Comprehensive Plan for review of consistency with the Strategic Regional Policy Plan for South Florida. Staff review is undertaken pursuant to the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes; and Rules 9J -5 and 9J -11, F?orida Administrative Code. Introduction Proposed amendment #97 -1ER has been submitted in response to the recommendations contained in the City's Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). The City of South Miami Comprehensive Plan EAR was determined to be sufficient by the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) pursuant to Rule 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code on December 1, 1995. Proposed amendment package #97 -1ERP contains a total of 16 amendments which are based on the recommendations contained in the City's Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). Of these, fourteen are map amendments to the City of South Miami's Future Land Use Plan. The remaining two text amendments are proposed to update Comprehensive Plan language and comply with the Statutory requirement for a Transportation Element. A map identifying the City's boundaries is included in Attachment 1. The specific location of Amendments No. 1 - 14 are shown in Attachments 2 -15. Analysis of the Amendment Package Staff analysis of the City's proposed Future Land Use amendments is included in Table 1. Proposed Amendment No. 15 contains text modifications to various elements of the comprehensive plan. The proposed changes are based on the incorporation of more current information and recent studies into the comprehensive plan. Analysis of specific changes is contained below. Future Land Use Element Proposed text amendments to the Future Land Use Element would expand policy language to protect the quality of life in single - family residential neighborhoods, promote pedestrian walkways and bicycle routes, and preserve natural areas. In addition, the proposed amendment would update the City's Future Land Use classification system. Housing Element Proposed text changes to the Housing Element would expand policy language encouraging owner - occupied housing and private home ownership. Infrastructure Element Proposed text changes to this element would update policy language describing sewer and water level of service standards. I'I Recreation and Open Space Element The proposed Recreation and Open Space amendments would expand policy language to provide a variety of recreational and social programs. Capital Irnprovensents EIen:ent Proposed text amendments to the Capital Improvements Element would add policy language describing the City's new five year schedule for capital improvements. The City plans to complete a street resurfacing project by 1999. Proposed Amendment No. 16 would replace the City's Traffic Circulation Element with a Transportation Element pursuant to the newly enacted State requirements. Policy language has been expanded to further coordination with the Metropolitan Planning Organization, Florida's Transportation Plan, and the Florida Department of Transportation's Adopted Work Program. Comments Staff analysis confirms that no adverse regional impacts will result from the proposed amendments. Staff analysis confirms that amendment package #97 -IER to the City of South Miami Comprehensive PIan will not generate significant increased demands on public facilities and is generally consistent with the Strategic Regional Policy Plan for South Florida (SRPP). Specifically, it furthers the goals and policies of SRPP which are directed at land use and public facilities planning and economic development. 11 MAR -14 -97 09:38 FROM: FDOT D6 PLNG + PRGMS + PR TD 305 3775567 PAGE 1 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 0MCF: OF PLANNING - IWrI141(Yr SIX Ir�M'1T1N CH1LEi DEN V. w'4T7) GOVERNOR 602 s(IVni MIAMI AVEN11L MIAMI, 11.()KIIIA 33130 "IAETARY PROW: (3055) 3714910 (W) 412 -1910 FAX: (303) 377 -5467 N0452-5967 March 12, 1997 Mr. Ray Eubanks, Planning Manager Florida Department of Community Affairs 2740 Centerview Drive Tallahassee, Florida 32399- -2100 Dear Mr. Eubanks: Post4t"' brand fax transmittal memo 7671 F0 or Pa9N 0 To �CL From ( v� , o. dept. � Pnona x 5z Fax N Fax # SUBJECT: City of South Miami: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review; DCA ref.# 97 -IER In accordance with your request, and the provisions of Chapter 163, Part I1, Florida Statutes and Chapter 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code, this office has completed a review of the plan amendment documents for die City of South Miami (DCA ref,ft 97 -1ER) which were forwarded to our office on January 16, 1997, The objections, recommendations, and comments of the District are attached to this letter. Please contact Phil Steiruniller, at the phone number above, if you have any questions concerning our response. Sincerely, VN : Gary L. Donn, P.E. District Director of Planning and Programs GD /pjs cc: Rob Magee, Office of Policy Planning Bill Mackey, Community Development Department in /Y MAR -14 -97 09 =39 FROM: FDOT DS PLNG s FRGMS + PR ID 305 377SSS7 EXTERNAL AGENCY REVIEW NAME OF AGENCY: Department of Transportation RESPONSIBLE DIVISION /BUREAU: District Six NAME OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT: South Miatni DATE PLAN RECEIVED FROM CITY: January 1.6, 1997 REQUIRED RETURN DATE FOR COMMENTS: March 10, 1997 ELEMENT: LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT: Applications 1. and I1. RULE DEFICIENCY - 9J- 5.0055(1)(a), 9J- 5.006(2)(a); and 9J- 5.019(3)(f) and (I). OBJECTIONS: None. RECOMMENDATIONS: None. FADE 2 COMMENTS: Application I. and H. indicate that they are "exempted from traffic coricurrcncy pursuant to the County's adopted Urban Infill Area." It appears that the City is indicating that transportation coneurreney is not an issue because the City is within the area of Dade County which is designated as a transportation concurrency exception area (TCF.A). It is our understanding that Dade County's TCEA applies only to unincorporated areas under the jurisdiction of Dade County. Therefore, it stems that the City's transportation analysis is flawed and that it is inconsistent with the Rule suctions noted above, because it does not address the provision of transportation facilities and!or services to support the proposed land use changes. REVIEWED BY: Phil Steinmiller REVIEWED BY: PFTONF,:(305) 377 -5910 PII0Nl::(305) 377 -5910 I� MF.R -14 -97 09:39 FROM: FDOT D6 PLNG + PRGMS + PR ID; 305 3775967 EXTERNAL AGENCY REVIEW !FAME OF AGENCY; Department of Transportation RESPONSIBLE DIVISIONiBUREAU: District Six NAME OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT: South Miami DATE PLAN RECEIVED FROM CITY: January 16, 1997 REQUIRED RETURN DATE FOR COMMENTS: March 10, 1997 ELEMENT: LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT: Application II RULE DEFICIENCY - None. OBJECTIONS: None. RECOMMENDATIONS: None. PAGE 3 COMMENTS: Application IT. identities modifications to SW 62 Avenue, between SW 64 Street and SW 70 Street. Has this proposed street modification been coordinated with the Dade County Department of Public Works? REVIEWED BY: Phil Steinmiller REVIEWED BY: PITONE :(305) 377 -5910 PI- IONI:-(305) 377 -5910 11 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Page 69, Objective 1.6 - This objective states that by 1996 the City will establish a transportation concurrency management area (TCMA) in conjunction with the approved Metro-Dade County transportation concurrency management area located east of the Palmetto Expressway. The reference to the County's approved TCMA is incorrect. Dade County has not approved or adopted a TCMA. In 1994 the County designated the area generally east of the Palmetto Expressway as a transportation concurrency exception area (TCEA) as defined by s. 163.3180(5), F.S. Dade's TCEA is referred to as the Urban Infiil Area (UTA). A transportation concurrency management area has a different meaning as defined in s. 163.3180(7), F.S. If the City's intention is to designate a TCEA, then the word "management" in Objective 1.6 should be changed to "exception ". Future Traffic Circulation Map - This map designates Miller Drive (SW 56 Street) and Ludlum Avenue (SW 67 Avenue) within the City, as County Collector roadways. The Metro-Dade County CDMP Traffic Circulation Element designates both of these County- maintained roadways as County Minor Arterials. It is recommended that the City redesignate Miller Drive and Ludlum Avenue as County Minor Arterials consistent with the Metro-Dade County CDMP. HOUSING ELEMENT Page 70, Policy 1.2.2 - Reference is made to "County HUD ". Since this entity no longer exists, it is recommended that it be deleted and replaced with "the Metro -Dade Housing Agency or Office of Community and Economic Development, as appropriate ". INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT Page 73, proposed Policy 1. 1.4 - The County's recently amended sanitary sewer level -of- service (LOS) standard no longer provides for a fixed per capita utilization rate. Therefore, it is recommended that the second sentence of Policy 1. 1.4 be deleted. Page 73, proposed Policy 1.2.1 - This policy regarding the City's solid waste level -of- service standard should be replaced with one to reflect the City's interlocal agreement with Dade County for use of the County Solid Waste Management system for disposal capacity, and the City's reliance on the County's disposal level -of- service standard to meet concurrency. It is recommended that the language of Policy 1.2.1 be replaced in its entirety with the following: Pursuant to the City's interlocal agreement with Metropolitan Dade County for use of the County Solid Waste Management System, the County shall ensure that the System, which includes County-owned solid waste disposal facilities and, those operated under contract with the County for disposal, for a minimum of five (5) years, collectively maintains an amount of solid waste disposal capacity sufficient to accommodate waste flows committed to the System through long -term interlocal agreements or contracts with municipalities and private waste haulers, and anticipated non - committed waste flows. CAW-M MMSAM MAR — 14 —97 09 : 40 FROM: T'r)(IT 06 ° Td + FRC, ;1 " • FR ; D 305 3775967 EXTERNAL AGENCY REVIEW NAME OF AGENCY: Department of Transportation RESPONSIBLE DIVISIONIBUREAU: District Six NAME OF LOCAL 00VERNMENT: South Miami DATE PLAN RECE:iVED FROM CITE; January 16, 1997 REQUIRED RETURN DATE FOR COMMENTS: March 10, 1997 ELEMENT: LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT: All Applications RULE DEFICIENCY - None. OBJECTIONS: None. RECOMMENDATIONS: None. PAGE 4 COMMENTS: It is extremely difficult to review the proposed amendments without the aid of a site location map, The City should provide maps which identify the location of proposed land use plan amendments with all future plan amendment submittals. REVIEWED BY: Phil Steinmiller REVIEWED BY: PHONE':(305) 377 -5910 PHONE:(305) 377 -5910 iq MAR -14 -97 09:40 FROM FDOZ 06 PLN:; + PRGMS + PR ID; 305 3775957 EXTERNAL AGENCY REVIEW NAME OF AGENCY: Department of Transportation RESPONSIBLE DIVISION /BUREAU: District Six NAME OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT: South Miami DATE PLAN RECEIVED FROM CITY: January 16, 1997 REQUIRED RETURN DATE FOR COMMENTS: March 10, 1997 ELEMENT: LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT: Application XIV. RULE DEFICIENCY - 9J- 5.0055(t)(a); 91- 5.006(2)(a); and 9J- 5.019(3)(f) and (I). OBJECTIONS: None. RECOMMENDATIONS: None. PAGE 5 COMMENTS: Application XIV. States that the "Roadway is designated level of service 'F'; therefore, no traffic impact analysis is required for this roadway." Again, it scents that the City's transportation analysis is flawed and that it is inconsistent with the Rule sections nixed above, We understand that this particular amendment seeks to "correct a designation for an existing use." However, this should not mean that an evaluation of transportation facilities andior services, to support the proposed land use changes, is not required. REVIEWED BY: Phil Steinmiller REVIEWED BY: PHONE:(305) 377 -5910 PHONE:(305) 377 -5910 11 MAR-°14 -97 09 =40 FROV. FT-)07 M� ?,,Mr PR( -,MS a '17 IT)+ 305 3775967 f sC't' 1 NAB, AUENC Y S�EVIEW NAME OF AGENCY: Department of Transportation RESPONSIBLE DIVISIONIBUREAU: District Six NAME OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT: South Miami DATE PLAN RECEIVED FROM CITY: January 16, 1997 REQUIRED RETURN DATE FOR COMMENTS: March 10, 1997 ELEMENT: TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT RULE DEFICIENCY - 9J- 5.019. PAGE 6 OBJECTIONS: Applications XV. and XVI. which contain text amendments related to the Transportation Element do not fulfill the requirements outlined in the Rule section noted above. The Future Traffic Circulation Map is not consistent with proposed land use plan amendment Application II. which would reduce the number of lanes on SW 62 Avenue, between SW 64 Street and SW 70 Street, from four to two. RECOMMENDATIONS: Prepare a Transportation Element which is consistent with the provisions of Rule 9J- 5.019. COMMENTS: None. REVIEWED BY: Phil Steinmiller REVIEWED BY: PHONE: (305) 377 -5910 PI IONF.: (305) 377 -5910 /y Department of r - � F`oR A Environmental Protection Lawton Chiles Governor W. D. Ray Eubanks Department of Community Affairs Bureau of Local Planning 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -2100 Marjory Stoneman Douglas Building 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -3000 February 4, 1997 -1 Virginia B. Wetherell Secretary Re: Proposed Amendment to City of South Miami, Comprehensive Plan Amendment 97 -1ER, Preliminary Review Dear Mr. Eubanks: A The Office of Intergovernmental Programs of the Department of Environmental Protection has reviewed the proposed referenced amendment under the procedures of Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 9J -5 and 9J -11, Florida Administrative Code and does not recommend a formal review. Please call me at (904) 487 -2231 if you have questions about our response. Sincerely, Robert W. Hall Office of Intergovernmental Programs "Protect, Conserve and Manage Florida's Environment and Natural Resources" Printed on recycled paper. 11 S o -tit Viorida Water Management District . -... �p 3301 Gun Club Road, West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 - (561) 686 -8800 - FL WATS 1- 800 - 432 -2045 FEB 5 - GOV 08 -06 January 30, 1997 Ray Eubanks, Planning Manager Plan Review and DRI Processing Team Florida Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Blvd. Tallahassee, FL 32399 -2100 `k 6� ` Dear Mr. Eubanks: .Local Gover•nrrier►t. City of South Miami DCA Amendment No: 97 -1ER The South Florida Water Management District staff has reviewed the subject document. We do not recommend that a formal review of the proposed amendments be undertaken. If you have any questions or require additional information, please call me at (561) 687 -6789. Sincerely, )�z ka�(� Murray Miller, AICP Senior Planner Lower East Coast Planning Division Planning Department MM/pc c: Carolyn Dekle, Executive Director, SFRPC Bill Mackey, AICP, City of South Miami Ken Metcalf, Community Program Adnunistrator, FDCA Govern I ng Board: Valerie Bovd, Chairman William Hammond Eugene K. Pettis Frank Williamson, jr., Vice Chairman Betsy Kranr Nathaniel 1'. Recd William E. Graham Richard A. Machek Miriam Singcr Samuel E. Poole III, ExccutIve Director Michael Slayton, Deluih• Lxecutil•e Director fif 17 i\ lading Address: P.O. Box 24680, NVest Palm Beach, 11- 3',416-4680 ERNE STO S. MEDINA 550 Northwest LeJeune Road, Suite 217 • Miami, Florida 33126 • (305) 447 -0977 A T T O R N L- Y A T L A W December 10, 1996 City of South Miami,. Planning and Zoning Division 6130 Sunset Drive Miami, Florida 33143 RE.: Designation to townhouses of 6550 S.W. 53rd Terrace South Miami, Florida Property Owner: Augusta Price Dear Sir(s) or Madam(s): - Designating the above parcel to townhouses will result in an over -all benefit to the community in general and specially to the younger generation of aspiring family property owners. Behind and adjoining the referred to parcel there are large parcels of existing townhouses. Permitting the creation of townhouses in the referred to parcel will result in a general improvement of the property resulting in increase tax revenues to the city and also in making beautiful and functional housing in a beautiful, centrally located setting to aspiring younger families. In these times where we have had so much separation of the central family unit, the role of government should be directed to encouraging the creation of accessible, functional, beautiful and affordable housing in the manner of townhouses to the younger generation of families in our community. Sic ly, RNESTO S. MEDINA, ATTORNEY AT LAW on behalf of the property owner, Augusta Price ESMjaa 9 LISA R CARSTAR.PHEN 6217 S.W. 78TH STREET MIAMI, FLORIDA 33143 December 6, 1996 Via Facsimile Mr. Mayor and City Commissioners City of South Miami Miami, Florida 33143 Re Amendment l0 /Re- zoning of Parking Lot on S.W. 62nd Avenue Dear Mr. Mayor and City Commissioners. I am a resident of the City of South Miami who owns a townhome located at 6217 &W 78th Street. I was recently informed of Amendment 10 to re -zone the parking lot located directly behind my property. As l am unable to attend the public hearing, I would like to express to you my strong; opposition to re- zoning the property to conform with the adjoining strip shopping; center. 1 believe that such zoning designation would be extremely disruptive to the neighborhood directly behind the parking; lot. 1. purchased my home in September 1995 and one of its most attractive qualities was the quiet and peacefulness of the surrounding; neighborhood. Because Cami's Restaurant is relocating, the noise and traffic levels behind my property have already increased greatly. A strip shopping center zoning designation for the parking; lot has the potential for an even further increase in noise and traffic and would negatively impact all of the surrounding property values. I am sure that all of my neighbors on S.W 78th Street would agree with me. am in favor, however, of re- zoning such property to a "townhouse" designation. Townhomes would enhance the values of both the parking lot property and the surrounding properties, while not disturbing; the neighborhood. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (305) 536 -1573 [days] or (305) 669 -1582 [Evenings]. Thank you for your consideration. Very Truly Yours, Lisa R. Carstarphen DEC 1996 C - H December 4, 1996 City. of South Miami, Building and Zoning and Community Development 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, Florida 33143 Gentlemen: We, the members of South Miami Garden Club, unanimously support the recent resolution passed on November 12, 1996 by the Planning Board of South Miami, to keep the Jean Willis Flowering Tree Park at its present location. We strongly oppose the destruction of this site. We trust that you would give serious consideration to our position. Very truly yours, Corresponding Secretary South Miami Garden Club President: Julie LaVoie 251 -9170 Organized 1952 by South. Florida Garden Club Federated 1953` Code No. L -13 Club No. 480 Florida Federation of Garden Clubs, Inc. District X11 cc: Mayor Tom Cunningham Larry Schokman Steven Pearson, Attorney DEC - 51996 1 Stiff 444 From: Patrick Fiorentino To: Bill Mackey Date: 12/2196 Time: 7:11:48 PM PATRICK FIORENTINO 8490 SOUTHWEST 53RD COURT - MIAMI, FL - 33143 PHONE: (305)666 -0994 - FAX: (305)667 -1710 P.FIORENTINO @INTERNETMCI.COM December 2, 1996 Bill Mackey Director of Planning and Zoning City of South Miami 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, FL 332143 Dear Mr. Mackey: I received the attached letter. I will attend the Public Meeting scheduled for December 10th. I would like to study how my property is effected and it's ramifications prior to that date. Would you please forward me briefing material so I may study it prior to the meeting My home address is above, my office is: (305)228 -3420, facsimile (305)220 -1464, and email pfiorentino @tigerdirect.com. Sincerely yours, Patrick Fiorentino Page 1 of 2 r 4030 Douglas Road Coconut Grove, FL 33133 November 5, 1996 Mr. Tom Cunningham Mayor, City of South Miami 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, FL 33143 Dear Mayor Cunningham: Jean Willis Flowering Tree Park Y 1 -NOV 71996 PLANNING DIV,S�0`4 Let me briefly enumerate the sequence of events that led to the planting of flowering trees in the neglected Jean Willis Park in 1992. The Tropical Flowering Tree Society was planning to establish a collection of tropical flowering trees in the greater Miami /South Florida area. We were searching for a suitable location, when the late Walter Perry (who was one of our T.F.T.S. Board of Directors) informed us that there was a small park in South Miami called the Jean Willis Park which was in a state of horticultural decay, and perhaps might be a good site for our plans. The Mayor of South Miami at that time was Cathy McCann who was not only enthusiastic, but also encouraged us to embark on this project. Walter Perry and I (at that time President of the Tropical Flowering Tree Society) met with Mayor McCann in her office and talked about this project, which would require a great deal of effort on the part of our Society, especially as the City of South Miami was unable to offer us any financial support. We discussed these tentative proposals with our Board of Directors, all of whom were very enthusiastic about this project, but with certain reservations. One of our most important concerns was the possibility that the next Mayor or his /her successor would not have the same commitment to this park project and its aesthetic contribution to the City of South Miami, as Mayor Cathy McCann. We were specifically concerned that someone might try to construct a building or parking lot on that site. As it turns out, our serious concerns were not unjustified. We conveyed these concerns to Mayor McCann, who in'turn discussed them with the Commissioners of South Miami. The Commissioners unanimously supported this project at that point in time, and emphasized their support for the future of Jean Willis flowering tree park. This official seal of recognition and support by Mayor McCann and the Commissioners of South Miami, enabled us to persuade our Board of Directors to unanimously pass a resolution to the effect that our fledgling Society would embark on this ambitious plan. We said that we would clean up the park, remove extraneous plants, redesign it (Raymond Jungles, a well -known and respected landscape architect in South Miami, did it at no charge, in consultation with us, so that something will be in flower eve_ ry day of the year), obtain the trees (many of them unavailable in 99% of the nurseries in the State of Florida), plant them, fertilize them on a regular basis and prune them when necessary, for the first five years of their existence. The park survived the wrath of Hurricane Andrew, and our volunteers did what had to be done to save the damaged trees:. Jean Willis was at the opening ceremony of the flowering tree park named after her, and was delighted with what she saw. As these trees reach maturity, each species is developing its own special architecture and integrity. It is o haven for birds, many of which have built their nests in these emerging canopies. Patients in the South Miami Hospital, commuters on Metro -Rail, people in the vicinity, the Police and Fire Departments are now beneficiaries of this green oasis in the heart of metropolitan South Miami. The Tropical Flowering Tree Society, has honored all its commitments at no cost to the City of South Miami (except mowing grass and other odd jobs). We did this with great pleasure, because we thought that we were in a partnership of trust with the Mayor and Commissioners of South Miami. You can imagine our surprise when we heard that the local Planning Authority was planing to demolish ( "relocate" is the word they used!) the Jean Willis Flowering. Tree Park. Sites designated as parks should n-Qt be used for other purposes. Attempts are now being made to amend this land use plan, under the guise that some land in another location can be utilized to compensate for the loss of this beautiful park. It is utterly incomprehensible to me that they are even contemplating this move. Moving these trees to another location is both expensive and unnecessary. There will be many fatalities of these trees if they are moved. W If, as the local Planning Authority states, they want to "relocate the parking lot in front of the Sylvia Martin building and restore the historic Palm Crescent Park," we endorse their effort. But it should not be at the expense of destroying this delightful little park in the heart of South Miami. A few years ago, an attempt was made to get rid of Jean Willis Flowering Tree Park, on the pretext that it would make a good parking lot! Fortunately, we were vigilant enough to get public support, plus an excellent article by Georgia Tasker in The Miami Herald, nipped that effort in the bud. Please help us save Jean Willis Flowering Tree Park now and for posterity. Sincerely, Larry M. Schokman (Tropical Flowering Tree Society) cc: Mr. Dennis L. Whitt, City Manager Mr. Bill Mackey, Director of Planning and Zoning Mr. Stephen Dade Pearson, President, T.F.T.S. and Chairman, City of Miami Committee on Beautification and Environment Ms. Georgia Tasker, Garden Editor, The Miami Herald !Y v M li •:s IX r, TROPICAL FL0_ WERI NG' TREE SOCIETY , ra! 10901 Olt~ Cutler Road, c/o Fairchild Tropical Garden, Miami; FLorida 33156 -4296 " a "IV ,a } d e "• a , i 1 yqr October 29, 1996 — 719W-11J.: Steyp.pe�rsort ,+ a.RE,SIDENT zo one Mann Mayor Tom Cunningham VIC ;PRESIDENT City of South Miami VIA TELECOPY & `k y' A. 6130 Sunset Drive Catgy,Ryan i HAND DELIVERY 7R URER ,; I South Miami, Florida 33133 ,, Facsimile (305) 663 -6345 at�a$j�ttKroner t `�` MEMRERSHIPySEC , ,suaKat � Re: Jean Willis Park RECORI? SE 'r,QCti_ `r z,gs \ L ;' Dear Mayor Cunningham- !PRO 3' ;t x �y= Six years ago, .'the' Tropical Flowering Tree Society 'made a wonderful gift to: the` City of South Miami - the r onversion of the Jean Wills' Park into Dade Count 's t Dons Ros " li r + ,t: y f irst flowering tree park ,�� The Society donated th EDUCATION6_ "trees, many of which are:rar'and, unusual species, and"` -, Stephanie Howe'• „F ` "tlie blood, sweat. and mu'tiple Hours of toil of many SPECIAL SALE volunteers are reflected, an the beauty and environmental enhancement found at this park today. Ruth Hopkins- Rosenthal'f . ;SOCIAL COMMITTEE , At the time of this project; "the ''Jean Willis Park x Luc Vanoorbeeck was a neglected patch a,ff turf; and :weeds, with a _SHOW &SALE CHAIR dilapidated gazebo. , .The 'Society °en offered to restore the gazebo prior`k;to` the Cit receiving and Willis Harding y MARKETING & PROMOTION g ` using FEMA funds for same At al] times duringi:he creation of this endeavoV, the " &6&ir -ety, had a • •clear Alan Howard understanding with Mayor Cathy McCann that its work SPECIAL PROJECTS would be respected, cared for, and cherished by the Ex OFFICIOS: City: Just , as clearly, the Society would not have made Dr. MonroeBirdsey this -gift ,if it had ever imagined that the City would Dolores Fugina Y not live up to 'its commitment in this regard. It is Bill Richardson , �= particul,`arly shocking to me that there are now some in \ City,, he at- would consider radical changes to the -N rk:w tYtqut ,Oven first consulting with and finding out now., the'Qety "felt about same. The current proposal p p �{ ft;o': destroy `ithe park and move the trees to some other area in Soui,;tf iami without any consultation with ' the 3 ,t: Socie.t,i onl insulting, but a clear violation of a Y gr the"' ,s j., i r5;n(angs and pledges of good faith that serVeqUFz ;the ucement to this entire endeavor by our So ,4 reason the City has such a beautiful ►,�� „° 9PCS` }�eC �;„ty workers and your standard, ..public W+ sries were not involved in this. OR T'NE H O R t Z O IV _k` S41 ,? f ;,' e4' ft ! f +�•rYl'++ f, :..k } -�i - r"Y"s,' 4 ' . 7: j- MA ,: planting. Indeed, some of the greatest horticultural expertise in South Florida contributed to the planning and planting of these trees. Giant holes were dug with the assistance of a backhoe, and special soil mixes were brought in to provide the trees with the mediums required for healthy and vigorous growth. With the wonderful establishment these trees have had, it is pure folly for anyone to be telling you and the other commissioners that they can move these trees and re- establish them in such a manner that they can regain the level of health that exists in the park today. This proposed move also comes right when many of the trees are reaching maturity and their lovely blossoms will be available for both community enjoyment and education. Why would the City want to move these trees to a relatively remote setting where they would be viewed and enjoyed by far fewer people? One of the reasons the Society and Mayor McCann agreed on this flowering tree park concept was so that riders on Metrorail would be able to view the blooming canopies and same would be a wonderful advertisement for the City of South Miami. The bottom line, however, is that trees are not statuary or other inanimate objects that can be easily moved from location to location. Instead, they are living organisms with each species having its own particular requirements, tendencies, growth habits, etc. All of those species specific considerations were taken into account in creating the Jean Willis Flowering Tree Park, and the importance of same cannot be overestimated. On behalf of the Board of Directors of our Society, I beseech you to resist the folly of destroying what was a carefully planned and executed piece of living art and beauty. This would not only be a violation of the trust we placed in the City, but a disservice to the citizens of South Miami and the community at large. Very truly yours, Stephen D. Pearson, President CC: All Commissioners a A i l! S �t NOV - 71996 125-1,007 P ?s iii F as i!' ERNESTO S. MEDINA 550 Northwest LeJeune Road, Suite 217 . Miami, Horida 33126 • (305) 447 -0977 A T T 0 R N li Y A T t. A W October 29, 1996 City of South Miami, Planning and Zoning Division 6130 Sunset Drive Miami, Florida 33143 Re.: Designation to townhouses of 6550 S.W. 53rd Terrace South Miami, Florida Property Owner: Augusta Price Dear Sir(s) or Madam(s): Designating the above parcel to townhouses will result in an over -all benefit to the community in general and specially to the younger generation of aspiring family property owners. Behind and adjoining the referred to parcel there are large parcels of existing townhouses. Permitting the creation of townhouses in the referred to parcel will result in a general improvement of the property resulting in increase tax revenues to the city and also in making beautiful and functional housing in a beautiful, centrally located setting to aspiring younger families. In these times where we have had so much separation of the central family unit, the role of government should be directed to encouraging the creation of accessible, functional, beautiful and affordable housing in the manner of townhouses to the younger generation of families in our community. Sincere y, ERNESTO S. MEDINA, ATTORNEY AT LAW on behalf of the property owner, Augusta Price ESM /aa 15 . 4.' V 12 1996 t37 525311 11 1.4 8 5291 ci- (B04 2 4/,. 6(, 4 R 6&49 bb 4d a 4) V I 53 All 22 5301 125 25 05 @ 19 27 21. 2R 2 24 - 25 -1 26 X/25 1-6503 168.1 Y,; 5321 23 -1/w 5331 20 ! 1 6623 6607 6567 6551 6535 6519 26 1 664 66.A" 0 28 in S. W. 0 53 TERR. 07 (a 144 4n 71.4 a 27 28 5341 6622 r�5341 0 66 6 6566� 6550 6522 28 31 32 3 .-34 1 008 6,499 5357 2@9 30 31 y 32 .-, 34 4 25 28 29 - W. 1 15' EASEMENT s- W 54 LA LO N 6690 -66-50.- 6 o dt1.JD 1ij g ;^nn, n An ":,I 7 A 4S 0- r6680 6670 6660 4 14 -j Nil. 3 8 z 10 8 1"09 nl At),IJU 4.R Art it, aI 5435 =! :, 6635 4 05 3 13 2 6675 6 6 2.5 (PRIVATE DRIVE) Sm Lu" RD if 9 TRACT 'A' 66 00 (PRIVATE DR 0 6500 147 b 3U 3O.C. zt f 6504 20 I1 VA`s lee ,� � � �(; .1 42 14Y 25 19 (�6o g 22 0, n 12 -- ' v N� " 6 38.i7r"A, 71,71 5410 1 D % b:DUd -544 At 26 2 N. 6640 '00 TRACT .. 'A' Af TRACT 'A' 1 .00 6535 27 g32 /6555 lb 4 13. 55.0 s l0 5420 D,Dw/4 31 o Pi 1W 28 3 wfz-) X\ 1@6 � -� .11 4 ion 'e wi, 1(9 L 54 ft Q 76 :14.0 0 IL (3�) 17 o e Me 5454 RACT "A 6545 k62 ne 6505 I A 6565-1 (PRIVATE DRIVE) 4 15' EASEMENT L'529 Ac 6523 96 ... ..... .. 14 TRACT A aR A, 5500 P ,)A 75 IOS. 2 7 12 i @ 5 6 64B9 i 6449 COPIES OF SAMPLE ADVERTISEMENT AND COURTESY LETTER REGARDING PROPOSED AMENDMENTS !Y l,n W a I tT r N W PQ W O Z rH 4 A D U� I Z O H H U W U) a U O A I A W x H H .Mf S -IN Ln r N ,, thin power IS — Ignore bells III Jr., South �uts of Ihcn.' abian- ,s told led to ,ay of alYec- d. lick rcer, ok at role One n dals tg an 1 9808. Ilion, with orable lily in chil- as an o with there gh 18, iddle- cnt to lvtro- ,S7, he "His I uni- awi s. ' just Inent nt this r--I f� 4-) U' I Jr 0 O U O 4­J 0 y, a though, and only now Uo thcy Say "eerie" I lie Boy Scouts made him an Vin all w uuu w Lm war - - -. to elite Order of the ` Cm the one who opened myself ".o .[uau� an6 a, 1-111­11- properties on the island and and one of Saturday's panel - they had an feeling about Huertas . adviser its Arrow, responsible for helping up.... I'm the one who made my opens the way for U.S. lawsuits ists. "We find it offensive and "Everyone Liked his work and the best Scouts attain merit bed.... I've set myself up.... against them. excessive." dedication," the police quoted bad"' trying to stay on my own two and alcohol, former Scoutmaster Terrence Boys' visits to Huertas' house feet, and continue on, but it's Glad works miracles in the Ripingill. lasted longer, sometimes until tough," he says in a court tran- A weary man's eyes light Rescue Mission during the But prosecutor Howard Rosen dawn. During nude massages, script of the conversation. says Huertas took advantage. two teenagers testified that Huer- Huertas thought out loud: to them and demonstrate the In his apartment, the boys tes- tas performed oral sex. Another Should he remain a cop? Move? ` IMF tified, he began by twisting arms, Scout, now a college student, said Sell his apartment? locking them in bear hugs. When parents pressured their sons to "It'll follow you forever," the he bumped into their crotches, he said he was only playing. stay around Huertas: To get an Order of the Arrow, they had to Scout leader told him. "You need to be honest with yourself." C V ITY OF SOUTH MIAMI "He made it seem like it was a see Huertas for safety badges. The Scout leader tried to get COPY aF r HEOFFICIAL REg ISTRATIO AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION MAYBE. OBTAINED FROM THE I nI B (ONS( 1nt .I NV1('FS BY C I LINO I(N L FREE WITHIN THE BTAtE. PHONE I %1 'v IMMY EM1TJORYEMENr. A1WROVAI'M NECOxIMRNOAno, BY TI115TAtE. guy bonding thing," said one of "He was the only Scoutmaster Huertas to name other victims, NOTICE OF LAND USE CHANGE the boys, now 15. that would do those badges," the but he never did. ADOPTION OF EAR -BASED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS Huertas offered massages, the teenager said. "I was disgusted On Friday evening, March 22, boys said, climbing onto their with myself that I had done Metro -Dade Detective Ralph backs, rubbing them all over with something that people always Hernandez arrested Huertas at The Ciry of South Miami proposes to change the use of land within the areas on oil —and grabbing their groins. taikaboutasbeingbad." police headquarters. Huertas the map in this advertisement by the adoptionofthefollowingtitledordinance; "If you sing me a song or shout 'mercy' or'I love you,' I'll let you Last winter, several boys quit Scout meetings, avoided Huer- said he was a "little tired." He told Hernandez that he and AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE go, $15.70 will feed l0 men. 1 ❑$62.80 ❑$157 [1 Others_ , According to testimony, Huer- by. that he gave them massages, but ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT THE tas tried to cultivate his victims' According to police reports, he insisted his accusers were RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED IN THE EVALUATION AND silence by telling them they were parents chastised their sons for lying about the oral sex or any APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR); PROVIDING FOR RE- NUMBERING AND /OR dirty and bad. ducking Huertas. How can you sexual touching. COMBINATION OF PARTS OFTHIS ORDINANCE WITH OTHER SECTIONS The silence was broken in be so ungrateful, one father "Do you feel that you have a OR PARTS OF SECTIONS OFTHE SOUTH MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; 199 L Mike Laperte, then a coun- asked, after Jessie was "so good" problem ?" Hernandez said. PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN selor at American High who had to you? "Yes." CONFLICT,• AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE PLEASE NOTE THIS heard about the boys' visits with After the arrest, the dad told °Do you think you need help?"' AMENDMENTPACKAGECONTAINS THE FOLLOWING ITEMS Huertas, warned him to stop his police he "forced" his son to con- "yes." "outside contact with the stu- Each year, the number of Mtami.F, 33242 -06,20 I Maa,snn Squam Mixed Osetand UwAmendmen, x Souahxiiami Shopping Cenmr Land Uwft.Amenr dents." Huertas romised Met- P H ChamAoToo Mixed Use Land U.Amend.mu xl Sowh Miami Middle $drool CU,- Ii.nAmmd.,0I Alarshalllhlham on Pod Re COnfigum,pn Amendment xll Ludlam Ofrce Lend U,Heplacemen,Amendmenl ro -Dade Lt. Lawrence Deutch N PmkVs.To_hoos Wnmse- eudroem x111 G,dSmmN,1,Cemcliondmendment he'd refrain from "nonsanc- 4y V CammuntyUm,,Mnd Um nd Uu Amendrtrent xlV Lnae ht nre,on Amendmenr VI Home,awnDnrO Mwd UwIedUse Amendment xV Bed Bnad Hes,dem alOR[e COmen on Amendment tioned activities" with boys. i I} fit VII Nlulli Famly Singular Ues6na,ion Land Use Amendment XV] Ear Basd COmp[ehe,u,m %tin languavAmmdmmn But the activities didnt stop. t i i i t i f ! i VIII kan H.WiIIh Nrklmd Use He laaho Ammdmem X111 Ea U dTmnspona on Elemm,Ammdmml X South M1l nti Hasp lal nd Umhmendmem Several months later, a 14 -year- old came home from Huertas' A Public Hearing by the City of South Miami Planning Board will be held place, looking withdrawn and ® (' on Tuesday, December 10, 1996, at 7:30 PM in the City Commission subdued. "Why did you go tg_a police- - - Chambers located at City Hall, 613D Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida man s douse ?" his mom asked.' ( 33143, in, order, to make recommendations to the City Commission The boy, a ninth- grader with ® ®' � regarding transmittal of proposed EAR -based amendments to the Florida emotional problems, froze. 1 Department of Community Affairs. v� $93,011,745 Pre-H funding $703,368,806 Public Schools Funding $142,783,238 Comm. College Funding $125,453,596 University Funding rte.,_ $1,064,597,385 Thmugh6 /30/96 A copy of proposed amendment package is available in the Planning & Zoning Division which is located at City Hall, 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida 33143, for review prior to the Public Hearing. For more information, you may call (305) 663 - 6327. The City welcomes the participation of those who have a special interest as well as those who have a general' interest in the Comprehensive Plan. Members of the public are encouraged to prepare written comments and suggestions to be submitted to either or both the Planning & Zoning Division staff members and Planning Board members, All interested parties may appear and be heard at the meeting for the transmittal of the proposed amendments. Parties are invited to submit written comments and materials inconsideration of their views (F.S. 163.3184). You are hereby advised that if any person desires to appeal any decision made with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such person will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceeding is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based (ES. 286.0105). Ir IIIIr! �a ■ the Mission he can sleep, in N fn I S U h During the next few weeksi ' 1.57 Meal and a a I. and alcohol, people will eolne to us seeking' E-I Glad works miracles in the of God... people who come to Miami UBS A weary man's eyes light Rescue Mission during the -{ 1 the up as he realizes that here at Thanksgiving season seems $ A copy of proposed amendment package is available in the Planning & Zoning Division which is located at City Hall, 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida 33143, for review prior to the Public Hearing. For more information, you may call (305) 663 - 6327. The City welcomes the participation of those who have a special interest as well as those who have a general' interest in the Comprehensive Plan. Members of the public are encouraged to prepare written comments and suggestions to be submitted to either or both the Planning & Zoning Division staff members and Planning Board members, All interested parties may appear and be heard at the meeting for the transmittal of the proposed amendments. Parties are invited to submit written comments and materials inconsideration of their views (F.S. 163.3184). You are hereby advised that if any person desires to appeal any decision made with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such person will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceeding is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based (ES. 286.0105). Ir IIIIr! �a ■ the Mission he can sleep, in to grow. fn I S safety. Addicts are freed from During the next few weeksi ' the bonds of cocaine, heroip ( hundreds of homeless; hungry. '- I. and alcohol, people will eolne to us seeking' E-I Glad works miracles in the help, UBS lives of the 'new homeless," Please help us say "YES" too. With His help and ours, to them and demonstrate the ing single parents families with power of faith in God's love. 3•,„ sen children, moms and dads can h�nf�rY their families together hold long enough to back It ell and get - - on track: ., COPY aF r HEOFFICIAL REg ISTRATIO AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION MAYBE. OBTAINED FROM THE I nI B (ONS( 1nt .I NV1('FS BY C I LINO I(N L FREE WITHIN THE BTAtE. PHONE I %1 'v IMMY EM1TJORYEMENr. A1WROVAI'M NECOxIMRNOAno, BY TI115TAtE. t where You can share the miracle HEOIN rRAI ION T wtERRI = IAEASECLIPANDMAIIMINYOUR QIF?MDAYMr#M from— of God's love with th ose who I'll hdp Mlmni Rcscuc Mission feed, ahcherqud care for. ' - thing— comelo [he IV1155i0n lhls hungry and homeless people this Thanksgiving season and ;�, Thanksgiving by providing a throughout the year. ' `owes receivea simple hot meal - ' Here is my gilt of: 0$15.70 ❑$31.40 ❑547.10 ' simple $15.70 will feed l0 men. 1 ❑$62.80 ❑$157 [1 Others_ , poll, and women and children call $31.40 will feed 20 Numc hungry People Addre ' nd a hot $47.10 will provide,30 ie e hope Thanksgiving dinners ' Cnyistum2lp , n and $62.80 will feed and God bless you for caring! You will receive a receipt for tax purposes. ' ('o.l. are uppmsimme and include Hrod, prepautiun anti the oeerhnud eq n— oI nourish 40 souls praim,i mi,,innuudmrvingmew,. L see $157 will provide 100 hot, ' MIAMI RESCUE MISSION people nourishing meals 0 P. o. Box 420620. Dept. BHS24 lower Each year, the number of Mtami.F, 33242 -06,20 LD,,ation:2020NW Isl Avenue tL = EEEE = = OUR 74TH YEAR OF SERVICE TO MIAMI ttt� A copy of proposed amendment package is available in the Planning & Zoning Division which is located at City Hall, 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida 33143, for review prior to the Public Hearing. For more information, you may call (305) 663 - 6327. The City welcomes the participation of those who have a special interest as well as those who have a general' interest in the Comprehensive Plan. Members of the public are encouraged to prepare written comments and suggestions to be submitted to either or both the Planning & Zoning Division staff members and Planning Board members, All interested parties may appear and be heard at the meeting for the transmittal of the proposed amendments. Parties are invited to submit written comments and materials inconsideration of their views (F.S. 163.3184). You are hereby advised that if any person desires to appeal any decision made with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such person will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceeding is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based (ES. 286.0105). Ir IIIIr! �a ■ .., ` g City of South Miami BUILDING, ZONING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6130 Sunset Drive / South Miami, Florida 33143 / (305) 663 -6327 Fax (305) 666 -4591 c November 29, 1996 Dear Property Owner: This letter serves as a courtesy notice to inform you that the Planning Board will be reviewing various amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan. Your property is directly affected by one of the proposed changes listed on the reverse side of this letter. These contemplated changes are based on the 1995 Evaluation & Appraisal Report adopted by the City on December 1, 1995. A Public Hearing is to be held on December 10, 1996, at 7:30 PM in the Commission Chambers which are located in City Hall at 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida 33143. Items will be reviewed and the Planning Board will formulate recommendations. A second Public Hearing for the transmittal of proposed amendments to the Florida Department of Community Affairs will be held by the City Commission during January of 1997. Final adoption of proposed amendments is anticipated in May of 1997, after the review of the Florida Department of Community Affairs. If you have any questions regarding the content of the proposed amendments, how your property may be affected, how the process works, or any other question or inquiry regarding planning and zoning matters, please, do not hesitate to contact me at 305.663.6327. You may also send your comments via telefacsimile at 305.666.4591. Please, include your telephone number on any fax. Thank you. Sincerely, 1�� Bill Mackey, YAICP Director of Planning & Zoning L. Dennis Whitt City Manager Planning Board Chair & Members "City of Pleasant Living" I y NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Amilk s CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 6130 Sunset Drive; South Miami, Florida 33143 Phone: (305) 663 -6327; Fax #: (305) 666 -4591 On Tuesday, December 10, 1996, at 7:30 P.M. the City of South Miami Planning Board, acting as the Local Planning Agency, will conduct a Public Hearing in the City Commission Chambers at the above address on the following: ITEM: PB -96 -024 Applicant: Local Planning Agency Request: A Public Hearing Regarding The 17 Proposed Ear- Related Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Items for Review at this Planning Board Public Hearing Will Include: I. Madison Square Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment II. Charrette Too Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment III. Marshall Williamson Park Re- Configuration Amendment IV. Park View Townhouses Land Use Amendment V. Community Center Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment VI. Hometown District Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment VII. Multi - Family Singular Designation Land Use Amendment VIII -a Jean H. Willis Park Preservation Land Use Amendment VIII -b Jean H. Willis Park Preservation & Sylva G. Martin Park Designation Amendment IX. South Miami Hospital Land Use Amendment X. South Miami Shopping Center Land Use Amendment XI. South Miami Middle School Correction Amendment XII. Ludlam Office Land Use Replacement Amendment XIII. Girl Scout Park Correction Amendment XIV, Little Park Correction Amendment (staff recommends that this item be withdrawn) XV. Red Road Residential Office Correction Amendment XVI. Ear -Based Comprehensive Plan Language Amendments XVII. Ear -Based Transportation Element Amendment The Public Hearing will allow time for discussion among Planning Board members, acting as the Local Planning Agency, members of Planning & Zoning Division staff and the general public. The Public Hearing meeting agenda will allow time for the following. 1) presentation of research and materials from the planning staff, 2) public discussion of concerns and comments, and (3) discussion on the topics raised during the staff presentation and the public input. The City welcomes the participation of those who have a special interest as well as those who have a general interest in the Comprehensive Plan. Members of the public are encouraged to prepare written comments and suggestions to be submitted to both staff and workshop members. All interested parties are urged to attend. Objections or expressions of approval may be made in person at the hearing or filed in writing prior to or at the hearing. The Planning Board reserves the right to recommend to the City Commission whatever the board considers in the best interest for the area involved. Interested parties requesting information are asked to contact the Director of Planning & Zoning by telephone at 305.663.6327 or in writing at the address indicated above. You are hereby advised that if any person desires to appeal any decision made with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based (F. S. 286.0105). Refer to hearing number when making any inquiry. 1 City of South Miami BUILDING, ZONING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6130 Sunset Drive / South Miami, Florida 33143 / (305) 663 -6327 Fax (305) 666 -4591 August 8, 1997 Dear Property Owner: This letter serves as a courtesy notice to inform you that the South Miami City Commission will be reviewing various amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan on August 19, 1997. Your property is affected by one of the proposed changes listed on the reverse side of this letter. The contemplated changes are based on the 1995 Evaluation & Appraisal Report adopted by the City on December 1, 1995, and were reviewed at a Public Hearing on December 10, 1996, by the South Miami Planning Board. A second Public Hearing for the transmittal of the proposed amendments to the Florida Department of Community Affairs was held by the City Commission on January 7, 1997. The Public Hearing scheduled for August 19, 1997, is for final adoption. If you have any questions regarding the content of the proposed amendments, how your property may be affected, how the process works, or any other question or inquiry regarding planning and zoning matters, please, do not hesitate to contact me at (305) 663 -6327. You may also send your comments via telefacsimile at (305) 666 -4591. Please, include your telephone number on faxes. Thank you. Sincerely, �yy Bill Mackey, AICP Director of Planning & Zoning L. Dennis Whitt City Manager "City of Pleasant Living" 14 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 6130 Sunset Drive; South Miami, Florida 33143 Phone: (305) 663 -6327; Fax #: (305) 666 -4591 On Tuesday, August 19, 1997, at 7:30 P.M. the South Miami City Commission will conduct a Public Hearing in the City Commission Chambers at the above address on the following: ITEM: PB -96 -024 Applicant: Local Planning Agency Request: A Public Hearing Regarding The 16 Proposed Ear- Related Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Items for Review at the Public Hearing Include: I. Madison Square Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment II. Charrette Too Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment III. Marshall Williamson Park Re- Configuration Amendment IV. Park View Townhouses Land Use Amendment V. Community Center Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment VI. Hometown District Mixed -Use Land Use Amendment VII. Multi- Family Singular Designation Land Use Amendment VIII Jean H. Willis Park Preservation & Sylva G. Martin Park Designation Amendment IX. South Miami Hospital Land Use Amendment X. South Miami Shopping Center Land Use Amendment XI. South Miami Middle School Correction Amendment XII. Ludlam Office Land Use Replacement Amendment XIII. Girl Scout Park Correction Amendment XIV. Red Road Residential Office Correction Amendment XV. Ear -Based Comprehensive Plan Language Amendments XVI. Ear -Based Transportation Element Amendment The City welcomes the participation of those who have a special interest as well as those who have a general interest in the Comprehensive Plan. Members of the public are encouraged to prepare written comments and suggestions to be submitted to both staff and workshop members. All interested parties are urged to attend. Objections or expressions of approval may be made in person at the hearing or filed in writing prior to or at the hearing. The Planning Board reserves the right to recommend to the City Commission whatever the board considers in the best interest for the area involved. Interested parties requesting information are asked to contact the Director of Planning & Zoning by telephone at 305.663.6327 or in writing at the address indicated above. You are hereby advised that if any person desires to appeal any decision made with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to 'be based (F.S. 286.0105). Refer to hearing number when making any inquiry. Iq MIAMI DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays Miami, Dade County, Florida. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF DADE: Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Octelma V. Ferbeyre, who on oath says that she is the Supervisor, Legal Notices of the Miami Daily Business Review f /k/a Miami Review, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami in Dade County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a Legal Advertisement of Notice in the matter of CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 19, 1997 inthe ...................... XXXXX....................................... Court, was published in said newspaper In the issues of Aug 8, 1997 Affiant further says that the said Miami Daily Business Review is a newspaper published at Miami In said Dade County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Dade County, Florida, each day (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Miami in said Dade County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither pal nor promised any perso firm or corporation any disc nt, rebate, commi re d for the purpose of se riRtt'ihis adverti t t r publi ation in the said ne pa r. _ .................... 8 w ugus�ubscribed before�K/ ,A� ........day of.. .... D CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY given that the City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida will conduct a Public Hearing during its regular City Commission meeting on Tuesday, August 19, 1997 beginning at 7:30 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, 6130 Sunset Drive, to consider the fallowing described ordinance:. AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA APPROVING AMENDMENT 96-2ER TO THE ADOPTED COMPRE- HENSIVE PLAN, IN ORDER TO - IMPLEMENT THE RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED IN THE EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR); PROVIDING FOR RE- NUMBERING AND /OR COMBINATION OF PARTS OF THIS ORDINANCE WITH OTHER SECTIONS OR PARTS OF SECTIONS OF THE SOUTH MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE Said ordinance can be inspected in the City Clerk's Office, Monday.- Friday during regular office hours. Inquiries concerning this item should be directed to the Planning and Zoning Department at: 663 -6347. ALL interested parties are invited to attend and will be heard. Ronetta Taylor, CMC City Clerk City of South Miami Pursuant to Florida Statutes 286.0105, the City hereby advises the public that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by this Board, Agency or Commission with respect to any matter considered at its meeting or hearing, he or she will need a record of the proceed- ings, and that for such purpose, affected person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which record in- cludes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. 8/8 97.3- 080878M ............ N.%C.. ��� - .. •.•. OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL �P (SEAL) JANETT LLERENA ^�f. � �� COMmiS310N NUMBER JK Octelma V. Ferbeyre personalty known to me. �S YA 1� , Q C C 5 6 6 00 4 7 w? �Q MY COMM13SION EXPIRES FOF F\O JUNE 23,2000 14 City of South Miami Parks & Recreation Department Inter- Office Memorandum ------------------------------------------------- TO: ayor & Commission / FROM: L. Dennis Whitt City Manager DATE: August 6, 1997 �IrSUBJECT: Agenda Item Commission Meeting August 19, 1997 Agreement - Metro Dade Community Space Lease Agreement ------------------------------------------- - - - - -- The attached resolution seeks approval for an agreement with Metro Dade County, on the matter of the Community Space Lease Agreement, which approves our Senior Center to run from their facility. The Senior Program has been a tremendous benefit to the residents of South Miami and surrounding areas, that I recommend approval for renewal with Metro Dade County. c: \wpdocs \agenda.hud97seniors 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY 3 OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO 4 EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT TO CONTINUE THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION 5 WITH METRO DADE COUNTY ON THE RENEWAL OF THE "COMMUNITY 6 SPACE LEASE AGREEMENT ", WHICH LEASES SPACE TO THE SOUTH 7 MIAMI SENIOR CENTER FOR THE 1997 -1998 YEAR. 8 WHEREAS, the City of South Miami participates with Metro Dade 9 County in various agreements; and 10 WHEREAS, the City of South Miami has maintained an agreement 11 with Metro Dade County for the utilization of their facility to run 12 the South Miami Senior Center; and 13 WHEREAS, in order to continue participating in this lease 14 agreement, the City Administration must execute a renewal 15 agreement. 16 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION 17 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Section 1. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the Renewal of agreement "Community Space Lease Agreement ", for the continuation of the leased space for the Senior Center. Section 2 This resolution shall take effect immediately upon approval. PASSED AND ADOPTED this ATTEST: CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY a: \res.leasehudseniors97 day of August, 1997. APPROVED: MAYOR ;j This Community Space Lease Agreement, made this 22 day of .Tl,7y , 199 7 , is entered into by and between Metropolitan Dade County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (hereinafter referred to as "County ") through its Metro -Dade Housing Agency (hereinafter "Landlord "), located at and (hereinafter referred to as `Tenant/Provider") whose address is 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, WHEREAS, the Home Rule Charter authorizes Dade County to provide for the uniform health and welfare of the residents throughout the County; and WHEREAS, the County recognizes the importance of providing supportive services to residents of its assisted housing which includes public housing residents, section 8 recipients, homeownership participants and other government assisted housing participants; and WHEREAS, the County is desirous of obtaining such services of the Tenant/Provider for its housing residents and the Tenant/Provider is desirous of providing such services; and WHEREAS, the County agrees to lease its space on its assisted housing premises to the Tenant/Provider so that Tenant/Provider can provide its services to assisted housing residents and accordingly passed Resolutions 891 -92 and 289 -89; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants recorded herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: I. THE PREMISES, The Landlord shall lease to the Tenant/Provider the premises located at 6701 SW 62 Avenue, South Miami, Florida 33143 II. THE SCOPE OF SERVICES. While the Tenant/Provider is in possession of the premises described in paragraph I of this Agreement, the Tenant/Provider agrees to render the services in accordance with the scope of services incorporated herein and attached hereto as Attachment A. Tenant/Provider agrees that at least _ 50 to 70 percent of its clients at any one time shall be residents of Dade County assisted housing and shall include public housing residents, Section 8 recipients, home owenrship participants and other government assisted housing participants. Tenant/Provider shall actively seek residents of Dade county assisted housing clients. Failure to provide the services described in Attchment A shall be grounds for termintion of this agreement. Failure to serve assisted housing residents at the percentage levels described above shall be grounds for termination of this Agreement. Tenant/Provider shall report the following information in writing on a quarterly basis to the site manager of Metro -Dade Housing Agency (MDHA) who oversees the premises described in Paragraph I of this Agreement: the actual number of assisted housing residents served within the previous six months and the type of services they received; the percentage of its clients who are assisted housing residents; and the percentage of its clients who are children of assisted housing residents. Page 1 of 9 /of III. AUTHORIZED AGENT ON PREMISIRS. Tenant/Provider shall designate a responsible individual on site that is authorized to make decisions regarding the use of the premises and services provided and shall communicate with the Landlord's site manager in order to effectuate a cooperative and efficient use of the premises by the TenantlProvider. IV. EFFEC M Both parties agree that the effective term of this Agreement shall be from July 1997 to . July 1998 This agreement may be renewed for two additional one year periods. V. RENT PAYABLE. Tenant/Provider shall pay rent in the amount of Ten Dollars ($10.0 per year plus any interest that accures on Tenant/Provider's security deposit. The rent shall be due on or before the 15th of each month VI. USE OF PREMLES. The Tenant/Provider agrees to use the premises only to provide the services described in the scope of services which is incorporated herein and attached as Attachment A Tenant /Provider shall leave the premises clean at the completion of programs each business day. Tenant/Provider realizes that the space may be used by other persons or entities such as residents during other times and days. The Landlord agrees to allow the Tenant/Provider from time to time utilize the space after normal business hours for the purposes of conducting meetings, trainings, or for other program related reasons. The Tenant/Provider agrees to advise the Landlord's site manager in advance of the date and time it desires to use the space after normal business hours. Tenant/Provider is responsible for securing its own personal property and agrees to hold Dade County harmless in the event of loss, theft, or damage when resident programs are conducted in the leased space. Under no circumstance shall the provider use this county owned property for religious purposes. VII. COMMON OF PREMISES. The Landlord shall ensure that the premises are in a state of good repair and suitable for occupancy by the Tenant/Provider at the commencement of this Agreement. By entering into this Agreement, the Tenant/Provider agrees that the premises are in a state of good repair and suitable for occupancy. The Tenant/Provider shall return the premises to the Landlord in the same condition as when received subject to normal wear and use. Tenant/Provider shall comply with community room capacity laws and therefore shall ensure enough space for the safety and enjoyment of the participants. The Landlord has the right to inspect the premises at any time to sure that all terms of the lease are being met. Tenant/Provider must immediately take corrective actions as a result of the Landlord's inspection findings. VIII. SECURITY DEPOSIT. Tenant/Provider shall pay Landlord a security deposit, of one month's rent or $2000 whichever is greater. Such deposit shall be applied to restoring premises to a state of good repair in the event the premises are vacated by the Tenant/Provider. Interest on the deposit shall go to the Landlord as additional rent. UL PARKING, Parldng spaces for Tenant/Provider's program participants , guests or visitors shall Page 2 of 9 be negotiated with the Landlord. The negotiated parking arrangements shall be reduced to writing and attached to this Agreement as Exhibit B. Buses or commercial vehicles will only be permitted to park at Landlord's facilities to make deliveries or drop off passengers. X. LTMITIES. Tenant/Provider shall pay for utilities directly to the correspondent utility company. If the meter covers several areas, Tenant/Provider shall pay the Landlord for its utility consumption in proportion to the space it uses, as determined by the Landlord. The attached Exhibit C indicates how payment for utilities shall be made. XL MAI=NAIYCE. Tenant/Provider shall be responsible for maintaining the premises. All routine maintenance and minor repairs shall be performed at the Tenant/Provider expense. If the Landlord performs routine maintenance and minor repairs on behalf of the Tenant/Provider, the Landlord shall charge the Tenant/Provider for time and materials used. Routine maintenance and minor repairs include but are not limited to plastering and interior paint; electrical work such as installing or changing lamps, bulbs and fuses, replacing outlet covers and other work that does not require rewiring or working inside the electric box; minor line blockages; replacing kitchen cabinets and counter tops. The Landlord shall be responsible for major repairs. Major repairs include but are not limited to: replacement of roofs or central air conditioner units; structural repairs; interior electrical wiring; electrical panel replacements and repairs; fire control systems; and exterior painting. The Tenant/Provider shall not make renovations or install any fixtures, equipment, fencing, or locks without prior written approval of Landlord. All fixtures installed by Tenant/Provider shall become the property of Landlord upon termination of the lease agreement. The Tenant/Provider shall be responsible for reimbursement to the Landlord for any and all losses or damages to property and/or equipment resulting from the operations of Tenant/Provider's programs. Tenant/Provider shall maintain and operate the premises in a clean and sanitary condition and return same to Landlord at the expiration or termination of this lease. XH. KEYS. Locks may be changed with the Landlord's permission at the Tenant/Provider's expense, if the Landlord's site manager is immediately furnished a set of keys. XIII. SIGNAGE. All signage must be in keeping with the residential nature of the property must conform to, all applicable building and zoning laws, and must be approved in writing by Landlord prior to installation. XN. JANITORIAL. SERVICES. The Tenant/Provider shall be responsible for all janitorial services including cleaning supplies. In the event that the Tenant/Provider requests janitorial services from Landlord, services will be provided for a fee to be negotiated between Landlord and Tenant/Provider. The negotiated janitorial services and fee shall be reduced to writing and attached to this Agreement as Exhibit D. XV. TRASH AND GARBAGE DISPOSAL Tenant/Provider shall make all necessary Page 3 of 9 arrangements, including billing, with local trash and garbage disposal companies. The Tenant/Provider shall pay for its trash and garbage disposal. XVI. The Tenant/Provider shall provide extermination of the premises by a professional exterminator as needed. In the event that the Tenant/Provider requests extermination services from Landlord, services will be provided for a fee to be negotiated between Landlord and Tenant/Provider. The negotiated extermination services and fee shall be reduced to writing and attached to this Agreement. A. Government Entity. Any Tenant/Provider who is the Sate of Florida or an agency or political subdivision of the State, as defined in section 768.28, Florida statutes, agrees to be fully responsible for its negligent acts or omissions or intentional tortious acts which result in claims or suits against the County, and agrees to be liable for any damages proximately caused by said acts or omissions. Nothing herein is intended to serve as a waiver of sovereign immunity by any Tenant/Provider to which sovereign immunity applies. Nothing herein shall be construed as consent by the State of Florida or a state agency or political subdivision of the State of Florida to be sued by third parties in any matter arising out of any contract. The Tenant/Provider, and its agents, subcontractors, and employees, in the course of the operation of this Agreement. B. All Other Tenant/Providers, The Tenant/Provider agrees to liable for all claims, suits, judgements, or damages, including court costs and attorney's fees, arising out of the negligent or intentional acts or omissions of the Tenant/Provider, and its agents, subcontractors, and employees, in the course of the operation of this Agreement. Further, the Tenant/Provider agrees to indemnify the County against all claims, suits, judgements, or damages, including court costs and attorney's fees, arising out of the negligent or intentional acts or omissions of the Tenant/Provide, and its agents, subcontractors, and employees, in the course of the operation of this Agreement. Also, the Tenant/Provider whether government entity or not agrees to defend the County, upon receiving timely notification from the County, against all claims, suits, judgements, or damages, including costs and attorney's fees, arising out of the negligent or intentional acts or omissions of the Tenant/Provider, and its agents, subcontractors and employees, in the course of the operation of this Agreement. A. Government Entity. If the Provider is the State of Florida or an agency or political subdivision of the State as defined by section 768.28, Florida Statutes, the Tenant/Provider shall furnish the County, upon request, written verification of liability protection in accordance with section 768.28, Florida Statutes. Nothing herein shall be construed to extend any parry's liability beyond that provided in section 768.28, Florida Statutes. F-ORMEWW"O 1. Modification and Changes The Tenants shall notify the County of any intended changes in insurance coverage, including but not limited to any renewals of existing Page 4 of 9 ' 14F insurance policies. Upon review of the Tenant/Provider's Scope of Services (Attachment A) by the County's Risk Management Division, the County may increase, decrease, waive or modify any of the following insurance requirements. Any request by a Tenant/Provider to decrease, waive or modify any of the following insurance requirements must be approved in writing by the County's . Risk Management Division. 2. Minimum Insurance Requirements: Certificates of Insurance, The Provider shall furnish to the Department, Metropolitan Dade County, c/o Certificate (s) of Insurance indicating that insurance, coverage has been obtained which meets the requirements as outlined below: a. Worker's Compensation Insurance for all employees of the Tenant/Provider as required by Florida Statute 440. b. Public Liability Insurance on comprehensive basis in amount not less than $300,000 combined single property damage. Dade County must be shown as an additional insured with respect to this coverage. C. Professional Liability Insurance, when applicable, in the name of the Tenant/Provider in an amount not less than $300,000. 3. Classification and Ratings. The insurance coverage required shall include those classifications, as listed in standard liability insurance manuals, which most nearly reflect the services or operations described in the Scope of Services (Attachment A). All insurance policies required above shall be issued by companies authorized to do business under the laws of the State of Florida, with the following qualifications: The company must be rated no less than `B" as to management, and no less than "Class V" as to financial strength by the latest edition of Best's Insurance Guide, published by A.M. Best Company, Oldwick, New Jersey, or its equivalent, subject to the approval of the County Risk Management Division. or The company must hold a valid Florida Certificate of Authority as shown in the latest "List of All Insurance Companies Authorized or Approved to Do Business in Florida ", issued by the State of Florida Department of Insurance and are members of the Florida Guaranty Fund. Certificates of Insurance shall indicate that no modification or change in insurance shall be made without thirty (30) days written advance notice to the certificate holder. C. Failure to Provide Cerd2cates of InsuranQe. If the Provider fails to furnish the County with the Certificate of Insurance or written verification required under this section or as determined by the County's Risk Management Division after review of the Scope of Services (Attachment A), the County shall not disburse any funds until is provided with the necessary Page 5 of 9 Certificates of Insurance or written verification. Failure to provide the Certificates of Insurance or written verification within sixty (60) days of execution of this Agreement may result in termination of this Agreement. M. PROOF OF LICENSURE_AND CERTIFICATION. If the .Tenant(Provider is required by the Sate of Florida Metropolitan Dade County to be licensed or certified to provide the services or operate the facilities outlined in the Scope of Services (Attachment A), the Provider shall furnish a copy of all required current licenses or certificates. Examples of services or operations requiring such licensure or certification include but are not limited,to child care, day care, nursing homes, and boarding homes. If the Tenant/Provider fails to furnish the County with the licenses or certificates required under this Section, the County shall not disburse any funds until it is provided with such licenses or certificates. Failure to provide the licenses or certificates within sixty (60) days of execution of this Agreement may result in termination of this Agreement. XX. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. The Tenant/Provider agrees to abide by and be governed by Dade County Ordinance No. 72 -82 (Conflict of Interest Ordinance codified at Section 2 -11.1 et. Al. of the Code of Metropolitan Dade County), as amended, which is incorporated herein by reference as it fully set forth herein, in connection with its contract obligations hereunder. XXI. CIVIL. RIGHTS. The Tenant/Provider agrees to abide by Chapter 11A, Article IV of the Code of Metropolitan Dade County ( "County Code "), as amended, which prohibits discrimination in employment; Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, as amended, which prohibits discrimination in employment and public accommodation; the Age Discrimination Act of 1975•, 42 U.S.C., as amended, which prohibits discrimination in employment because of age; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794, as amended, which prohibits discrimination on basis of disability; and the Americans with Disability Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12103 et seq., which prohibits discrimination in employment accommodation because of disability. It is expressly understood that upon receipt of evidence of discrimination under any these laws, the County shall have the right to terminate this Agreement. It is further understood that the Provider must submit an affidavit attesting that it is not violation of the Americans with Disability Act, the Rehabilitation Act, the Federal Transit Act, 49 U.S.C. § 1612, and the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et. seq. If the Tenant/Provider or any owner, subsidiary, or other firm affiliated with or related to the Provider, is found by the responsible enforcement agency, the Courts or the County to be violation of these Acts, the County will conduct no further business with the Tenant/Provider. Any contract entered into based upon false affidavit shall be voidable by the County. If the Tenant/Provider violates any of the Acts during the term of any contract the Tenant/Provider has with the County, such contract shall be voidable by the County, even if the Tenant/Provider was not in violation at he time it submitted its affidavit. XXIL NOTICES. It is understood and agreed between the parties that written notice addressed to the Landlord and mailed or delivered to the address below and written notice addressed to the Tenant/Provider and mailed or delivered to the address below shall constitute sufficient notice either party. Page 6 of 9 11` Landlord Tenant/Provider city of South Miami f130 Sunset Drive South Miami, Fl. 33143 XXIII. AUTONOMY. Both parties agree that this Agreement recognizes the autonomy of and stipulates or implies no affiliation between the contracting parties. It is expressly understood and intended that the Tenant/Provider is only a tenant/provider and is not an agent or instrumentality of the County. , A. Breach, A breach by the Tenant/Provider shall have occurred under this Agreement if. (1) the Tenant/Provider fails to adequately provide the services outlined in the Scope of Services (Attachment A) within the effective term of this Agreement; (2) the Tenant/Provider does not furnish the Certificates of Insurance required by this Agreement or as determined by the County's Risk Management Division; (3) the Tenant/Provider does not furnish proof of licensure and certification required by this Agreement (4) the Tenant/Provider fails to pay rent on or before the date; (5) the Tenant/Provider does not have the required percentage of assisted housing residents or their children as clients; (6) the Tenant/Provider fails to properly maintain premises, make repairs, pay utilities, obtain garbage collection, complete extermination, and perform other general upkeep of the premises; (7) the Tenant /Provider discriminates under any of the laws outlined in Section VII of this Agreement; (8) the Tenant/Provider falsifies or violates the provisions of the Drug Free Workplace Affidavit (Exhibit F); (9) the Tenant/Provider, attempts to meet its obligations under this Agreement through fraud, misrepresentation or material misstatement; or (10) the Tenant/Provider fails to fulfill in timely and proper manner any and all of its obligations, covenants, agreements and stipulations in this Agreement. A breach by the Landlord shall occur if it fails to meet its obligations under this Lease Agreement. Waiver of breach of any provisions of this contract shall not be deemed to be a wavier of any other breach and shall not construed to be a modification of the terms of this Agreement. B. Remedies. Landlord and Tenant/Provider may terminate this Agreement and may pursue any and all remedies available under applicable law for a breach under the Lease Agreement. If, for any reason, the Tenant/Provider should attempt to meet its obligations under this Agreement through fraud, misrepresentation or material misstatement, the Landlord shall, whenever practicable terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to the provider of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof at least five days before the effective date of such termination. The County may terminate or cancel any other contracts which such individual or entity has with the County at that such individual or entity shall be responsible for all direct and indirect costs associated with such termination or cancellation, including attorney's fees. Any individual or entity who attempts to meet its contractual obligations with the County through fraud, misrepresentation or material misstatement may debarred from County contracting for up to five (5) years. The Landlord may seek to evict Tenant/Provider by filing an action in a court of appropriate jurisdiction. Page 7 of 9 /j C. Damages Sustained. Notwithstanding the above the Tenant/Provider shall not be relieved of liability to the Landlord for damages sustained by the Landlord by virtue of any breach of the Agreement. The Landlord may also pursue any remedies available at law or equity to compensate for any damages sustained by the breach. The Tenant/Provider shall be responsible for all direct and indirect costs associated with such action, including attorney's fees. XXV. TERMINATION BY EITHER PARTY. Both parties agree that this Agreement may be terminated by TenandProvider by written notice to the Landlord of such intent to terminate at least thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of such termination. Both parties agree that the County may terminate this agreement by providing written notice of such intent to terminate at least five days prior to the effective date of termination. In order to effectuate eviction proceedings, Lanlord agrees to abide by all the notice requirements of the Landlord - Tenant Act. The County Manager of Metropolitan Dade County is authorized to terminate this Agreement on behalf of the Landlord. uI UOR a . U A dub- lease. The parties agree that no assignment or sub -lease will be made or let in connection with this Agreement without prior written approval of the Landlord, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, and the all sub - lessors or assignees shall be governed by the terms and conditions of this Agreement. B. Agreement Guidelines. The Tenant/Provider agrees to comply with all applicable Federal, State and County laws, rules and regulations, particularly the Landlord/Tenant act, which incorporated herein by reference or fully set forth herein. C. Modifications. Any alterations, variations, modifications, extensions or waivers of provisions of this Agreement including but not limited to rent payable and effective term shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing, duly approved and. signed by both parties and attached to the original of this Agreement. The County Manager is authorized to excercise this modification section on behalf of the County. D. Totality of Agreemenr/Severability of Provisions. This nine (9) page Agreement with its attachments as referenced below contain all the terms and conditions agreed upon parties: Attachment A: Agreement Program Narrative (Scope of Services) Attachment B: Parking Arrangement Attachment C: Utility Payment Schedule Attachment D: Janitorial Services Attachment E: Extermination Services Attachment F: Metro -Dade County Affidavits Attachment G: State Public Entities Crime Affidavit No other Agreement, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement is held invalid or void, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby if such remainder would then continue to conform to the terms and requirements applicable law. Page 8 of 9 TA" IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to executed by their respective and duly authorized officers the day and year first above written. (SEAL) ATTEST: City of South Miami AGENCY NAME By: (Signature of Secretary/Treasurer) Type or Print Name Witnesses: By: Signature Type or Print Name ATTEST: HARVEY RUVIN, CLERK DEPUTY CLERK By: (Signature of Secretary/Treasurer) Type or Print Name By: Signature Type or Print Name METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA Page 9 of 9 ARMANDO VIDAL, P.E. COUNTY MANAGER or RENE RODRIGUEZ DIRECTOR, METRO -DADE HOUSING AGENCY Ili I METRO -DADE COUNTY AFFIDAVITS The contracting individual or entity (governmental or otherwise) shall indicate by an "X" all affidavits that pertain to this contract and shall indicate by an "N /A" all affidavits that do not pertain to this contract. All blank spaces must be filled. The METRO -DADE COUNTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE AFFIDAVIT: METRO -DADE COUNTY EMPLOYMENT DISCLOSURE AFFIDAVIT. METRO -DADE CRIMINAL RECORD AFFIDAVIT: and DISABILITY NONDISCRIMINATION AFFIDAVIT shall not pertain to contracts with the United States or .any of its departments or agencies thereof. the State or any political subdivision or agency thereof or any municipality of this State. The METRO -DADE FAMILY LEAVE AFFIDAVIT shall not pertain to contracts with the United States or any of its departments or agencies or the State of Florida or any political subdivision or agency thereof. it shall. however. pertain to municipalities of the State of Florida. All other contracting entities or individuals shall read carefully each affidavit to determine whether or not it pertains to this contract. I. L Dennis Whitt being first duly sworn state: Affiant The full legal name and business address of the persons) or entity contracting or transacting business with Metro -Dade County are (Post Office addresses are not acceptable): 59- 600431 Federal Employer Identification Number (If none. Social Security) CitV of South Miami Name of Entity. Individual(s). Partners. or Corporation Doing Business As (if same as above. leave blank) 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami Florida 33143 Street Address City State Zip Code 1. METRO -DADE COUNTY DISCLOSURE AFFIDAVIT (Sec. 2 -8.1 of the County Code) 96 c•: ucioo-s-ua If the contract or business transaction is with a corporation. the full legal name and business address shall be provided for each officer and director and each stockholder who holds directly or indirectly five percent (5 %) or more of the corporation's stock. If the contract or business transaction is with a partnership. the foregoing information shall be provided for each partner. If the contract or business transaction is with a trust. the full legal name and address shall be provided for each trustee and each beneficiary. The foregoing requirements shall not pertain to contracts with publicly- traded corporations or to contracts with the United States or any department or agency thereof, the State or any political subdivision or agency thereof or any municipality of this State. All such names and addresses are (Post Office addresses are not acceptable): Full Legal Name Address Page 1 of 4 Ownership 2. The full legal names and business address of any other individual (other than subcontractors. materialmen. suppliers. laborers. or lenders) who have. or will have. any interest (legal. equitable beneficial or otherwise) in the contract or business transaction with Dade County are (Post Office addresses are not acceptable): 3. Any person who willfully fails to disclose the information required herein. or who knowingly discloses false information in this regard. shall be punished by a fine of up to five hundred dollars ($500.00) or imprisonment in the County jail for up to sixty (60) days or both. II. METRO -DADS COUNTY EMPLOYMENT DISCLOSURE AFFIDAVIT (County Ordinance No. 90 -133. Amending sec. 2.8 -1. Subsection (d)(2) of the County Code). Except where precluded by federal or State laws or regulations. each contract or business transaction or renewal thereof which involves the expenditure of ten thousand dollars ($10.000) or more shall require the entity contracting or transacting business to disclose the following information. The foregoing disclosure requirements do not apply to contracts with the United States or any department or agency thereof. the State or any political subdivision or agency thereof or any municipality of this State. 1. Does your firm have a collective bargaining agreement with its employees? X Yes — No 2. Does your firm provide paid health care benefits for its employees? X Yes _ No 3. Provide a current breakdown (number of persons) of your firm's work force and ownership as to race. national origin and gender: White: 33 Males 14 Females Asian: 0 Males 0 Females Black: 33 Males 14 Females American Indian: 0 Males 0 Females Hispanics: 26 Males 16 Females Aleut (Eskimo): 0 Males 0 Females Males Females Males Females e III. METRO -DARE COUNTY CRIMINAL RECORD AFFIDAVIT (Section 2 -8.6 of the County Code) The individual or entity entering into a contract or receiving funding from the County has has not as of the date of this affidavit been convicted of a felony during the past ten (10) years. An officer. director. or executive of the entity entering into a contract or receiving funding from the County has X has not as of the date of this affidavit been convicted of a felony during the past ten (10) years. IV. METRO -DADS COUNTY CUBA AFFIDAVIT (County Resolution R- 656 -93) That neither the firm (individual. organization, corporation. etc.) submitting this bid or proposal or receiving this contract award or any of its owners. subsidiaries. or affiliated or related firms. are in violation of the Cuba Democracy Act of 1992. In accordance with County Resolution No. R- 656 -93, all firms (individual. organization. corporation. etc.) submitting bids or proposals or receiving contract awards attest that neither the firm or any of its owners. subsidiaries. or affiliated or related firms. are in violation of the Cuba Democracy Act of 1992 which imposes the U.S, trade embargo to Cuba. Page 2 of 4 C u0oo7.&4M _ V. METRO -DADE EMPLOYMENT DRUG -FREE WORKPLACE AFFIDAVIT (County Ordinance No. 92 -15 codified as Section 2-8.1.2 of the County Code) That in compliance with Ordinance No. 92 -15 of the Code of Metropolitan Dade County. Florida. the above named person or entity is providing a drug - free }workplace. A written statement to each employee shall inform the employee about: 1. danger of drug abuse in the workplace 2. the firm's policy of maintaining a drug -free environment at all workplaces 3. availability of drug counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance programs 4. penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations The person or entity shall also require an employee to sign a statement. as a condition of employment that the employee will abide by the terms and notify the employer of any criminal drug conviction occurring no later than five (5) days after receiving notice of such conviction and impose appropriate personnel action against the employee up to and including termination. Compliance with Ordinance No. 92 -15 may be waived if the special characteristics of the product or service offered by the person or entity make it necessary for the operation of the County or for the health, safety. welfare, economic benefits and well -being of the public. Contracts involving funding which is provided in whole or in part by the United States or the State of Florida shall be exempted from the provisions of this ordinance in those instances where those provisions are in conflict with the requirements of those governmental entities. VI. METRO -DADE EMPLOYMENT FAMILY LEAVE AFFIDAVIT (County Ordinance No. 142 -91 codified as Section I IA -29 et. sec of the County Code) That in compliance with Ordinance No. 142 -91 of the Code of Metropolitan Dade County. Florida, an employer with fifty (50) or more employees working in Dade County for each working day during each of twenty (20) or more calendar work weeks, shall provide the following information in compliance with all items in the aforementioned ordinance: An employee who has worked for the above firm at least one (1) year shall be entitled to ninety (90) days of family leave during any twenty-four (24) month period. for medical reasons, for the birth or adoption of a child. or for the care of a child. spouse or other close relative who has a serious health condition without risk of termination of employment or employer retaliation. The foregoing requirements shall not pertain to contracts with the United States or any department or agency thereof. or the State of Florida or any political subdivision or agency thereof. It shall, however, pertain to municipalities of this State. VII. DISABILITY NON - DISCRIMINATION AFFIDAVIT (County Resolution R- 385 -95) That the above named firm. corporation or organization is in compliance with and agrees to continue to comply with. and assure that any subcontractor, or third party contractor under this project complies with all applicable requirements of the laws listed below including. but not limited to, those provisions pertaining to employment, provision of programs and services, transportation. communications. access to facilities, renovations, and new construction in the following laws: The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA). Pub. L. 101 -336. 104 Stat 327, 42 U.S.C. 12101 -12213 and 47 U.S.C. Sections 225 and 611 including Title I. Employment: Title IL Public Services: Title III. Public Accommodations and Services Operated by Private Entities: Title IV, Telecommunications: and Title V. Miscellaneous Provisions: The Rehabilitation Act of 1973. 29 U.S.C. Section 794: The Federal Transit Act, as amended 49 U.S.C. Section 1612: The Fair Housing Act as amended. 42 U.S.C. Section 3601 -3631. The foregoing requirements shall not pertain to contracts with the United States or any department or agency thereof. the State or any political subdivision or agency thereof or any municipality of this State. Page 3 of 4 96 C. WC100" .W1 VIII. METRO -DADE COUNTY REGARDING DELINQUENT AND CURRENTLY DUE FEES OR TAXES (Sec. 2- 8.1(c) of the County Code) Except for small purchase orders and sole source contracts. that above named firm. corporation. organization or individual desiring to transact business or enter into a contract with the County verifies that all delinquent and currently due fees or taxes -- including but not limited to real and property taxes. utility taxes and occupational licenses -- which are collected in the normal course by the Dade County Tax Collector as well as Dade County issued parking tickets for vehicles registered in the name of the firm. corporation_ organization or individual have been paid. I have carefully read this entire four (4) page document entitled, "Metro -Dade County Affidavits" and have indicated by an "X" all affidavits that pertain to this contract and have indicated by an "N /A" all affidavits that do not pertain to this contract. 19_ by presented By: (Signature of Affiant) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO (or affirmed) before me this (Type of Identification) (Signature of Notary) (Print or Stamp of Notary) Notary Public - State of (State) R96 C: XC1007UV as identification. Page 4 of 4 (Date) day of He/She is personally known to me or has (Serial Number) (Expiration Date) Notary Seal /Jr SWORN STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 217 .133(3) (a), ON PUBLIC ENTITY CRII M THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND SWORN TO IN THE PRESENCE OF A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OT= OFFICIAL AUTHORIZED TO AMR (ISM WE& L MLis swore statement is submitted to Metro Dade Count, (print name of the public entity] by L. Dennis Whitt, City Manager (print lmdividual's name and titiel for City of South Miami (print name of entity submitting swum statement) . whose business ad4rtts is 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami. Florida 33141 and (lf applicable) its Federal Pmpioya Mentifitation Number (EW h 59- 6000431 (If the entity has no PW(. include the Social Security Number of the hWhidual signing this sworn statement ) 2. I understand that a 'public entity acme' as defined in Paragraph 287AWI)(g), Florida Statutes, means a violation of any state or federal law by a person with rapes to and diti Cq relied to the transaction of business with any public entity at with an agency or politWd subdM don of Day other state or of the United States, including, but not United to, a" bid or coatract for goods or services to be provided to any public entity or an agency or political subdivision of any other state or of the United States and involving antitrust, fraud, theft, bribery, collusion, racketeering, conspiracy, or material misIept+esentatroU. 3. I understand that •convicted' or 'conviction' as defined in Paragraph 287.133(1)(b), Florida Statutes means a finding of pat or a conviction of a public entity crime, with or without an adjudication of guilt, in any federal or state trial court of record relating to charges brought by indictment or information after July 1, 1989, as a result of a jury verdict, nonjury trial, or entry of a plea of guilty or noto contendere. 4. I understand that an 'affiliate as defined in Paragraph 287.133(1)(a), Florida Statutes, means: L A predecessor or succau r of a person convicted of a public entity crime; or ' 2 An entity under the a ntrol of any natural person who is active in the management of the entity and who has been convicted of a public entity crime. The term ' affiliate• .includes those officers, directors, executives, pattaess, sharebolbeM employees, members, and agents who ate active in the management of an affiliate The ownership by one person of shares constituting a controlling interest in another person, or a pooling of equipment or income among persons when not for fair market value under an arm's length agreement, shall be a prima foie case that one person controls another person. A person who imowingly enters into a joint venture with a person who bas been convicted of a public entity crime to Florida during the preaediag 36 months shat! be aonsidered an afffiliate. S. I understand that a ' person' as defined in Paragraph 387.133(1)(e), Hkwtda Statutes. means any natural person or entity organized tinder the laws of any state or of the United States with the legal power to enter into a binding contract and which bids or applies to bid on contracts for the provision of goods or services let by a public entity, or which otherwise transacts or applies to transact business with a public entity. The term 'person' includes those officers, directors, ezeeutives, partners, shareholders, employees, members, and agents who are active in management of an entity. /t 6. Based on infgrmation and belief, the statement which I have marked below is tree in relation to the entity submitting this rvworn statement [indkate which statement appUes.l Neither the entity submitting this sworn statement, nor any of to offloo , directors, exeonttm, parmers, shareholders, employees, members, or agents who are active in the management of the entity, nor any affiliate of the entity has been charged with and convicted of a public entity crime subsequent to July 1, 1989. ne entity submitting this s om statement, or one or more of its 095=3; direaon, ewcutives, of an afIIliazc of the en entity bas employees, charted with sated �eoavicted of a public on crime t Of sabsequentat oJuly, 1, 1989. Mie entity submitting this swain satemeat, or use or more of its Oft= distort. sea dm, p as, shar+ehoideM employeeea, members, or agents who are active is the Management of the entity, or an affiliate of the entity has ban Charged with and Goaricted of apa attity crime subsequent t July 1,1989. Howe�+e� there has hem a:abiegtreat proceeding before a Heu�iat Ofllz of the State of Florida, Dmdon of Admird4tratin Hearings and the Final Order entered by the Hating OlJiew daamined that it was not in the public interest to plane the entity submitting this sworn statement on the aonviaed vendor list. [attach a eW of the anal order] I U. EMAND THAT THE SUBMISSION OF THIS FORM TO THE CONTRACTING OFFICER FOR THE PUBLIC EN TIIY IDENTn= Dj PARAGRAPH 1 (ONZ) ABOVE IS FOR THAT PUBLIC MMW ONLY AND, THAT THIS FORM IS VALID THROUGH DECEMBER 31 OF THE CALENDAR YEAR IN WHICH IT IS FII.ID. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT I AM RRQU = TO WORM THE PUBLIC ENT= PRIOR TO ENTZMNG INTO A CONTRACT IN EXCESS OF THE THRESHOLD AMOUNT PROVIDED IN SECTION =7AT79 MM& M= FOR CATEGORY TWO OF ANY CHANGE IN THE INFORMATION CONTAD= IN THIS FORM. [mil Sworn to and subscribed before me this ® day of . 19 Personally imown OR Produced identification Crype of identification) Notary Public • State of My commission expires (Printed typed or stamped commissioned name of notary public) Form FUR 7068 (Rev. 06 /18/92) '� CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI © INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and City Commission Date: August 14, 1997 Agenda Item # From: L. Dennis Whitt Re: Comm. Mtg. 08/19/97 City Manager Amortization Instructions REQUEST: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO INSTRUCTIONS TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATION TO NEGOTIATE AMORTIZATION OF TWO OF THE FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS REQUIRED BY THE CITY FROM THE DEVELOPER OF SHOPS AT SUNSET PLACE, WHEREBY MONIES COLLECTED SHALL BE PLACED IN AN INTEREST - BEARING TRUST FUND FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE HOMETOWN DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS: The developer of the Shops at Sunset Place is obligated to pay the City a total of $750,000 over the next five years for improvements to the Hometown District. The developer would like to pay all of the obligation in the form of a present value payment to satisfy these requirements. The proposed resolution provides for instructions to City Administration to initiate negotiations and to report back to the City Commission prior to any acceptance of funds. The resolution also anticipates the creation of an interest - bearing trust fund to receive any future payment. Accelerated payments by the developer allows the City to use funds now for projects to improve the infrastructure in the Hometown District prior to the opening of the Shops at Sunset Place. In addition, a portion of these funds can be used to cover any potential shortfall that may occur in the Sunset Drive Improvements project. Completion of which is important to the City' image. RECOMMENDATION: Approval. Proposed Resolution for Adoption City Manager's Report: Amortization Instructions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO INSTRUCTIONS TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATION TO NEGOTIATE AMORTIZATION OF TWO OF THE FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS REQUIRED BY THE CITY FROM THE DEVELOPER OF SHOPS AT SUNSET PLACE, WHEREBY MONIES COLLECTED SHALL BE PLACED IN AN INTEREST - BEARING TRUST FUND FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE HOMETOWN DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, per Resolution No. 70 -95 -9619, Section 3, § 12, the developer of the Bakery Centre (a.k.a. Shops at Sunset Place) is required to directly pay to the City $350,000 exclusively for the design and improvement of the streets in the Hometown District, excluding Sunset Drive, and according to the following schedule: Due Date of Payment SEPTEMBER 1997 SEPTEMBER 1998 SEPTEMBER 1999 SEPTEMBER 2000 SEPTEMBER 2001 Amount Due $50,000 $50,000 $83,333 $83,333 $83,333; and, WHEREAS, per Resolution No. 145 -96 -9899, the developer of the Bakery Centre(a.k.a. Shops at Sunset Place) is required to directly pay to the City $400,000, which may be used for costs related to Sunset Drive, and according to the following schedule: Due Date of Payment SEPTEMBER 1997 SEPTEMBER 1998 SEPTEMBER 1999 SEPTEMBER 2000 SEPTEMBER 2001 Amount Due $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000; and, WHEREAS, the developer of the Bakery Centre desires to pay the full amount based on an single payment which will reflect the present value of the aforementioned $750,000; and, WHEREAS, City Administration desires to negotiate the amount that may be accepted by the City as a present value payment; and, Amortization Instructions Resolution: August 19, 1997 Y6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 WHEREAS, the City is required via Resolution No. 70 -95 -9619 to provide for matching funds according to schedule, and the City hereby recognizes that acceptance of a present value payment does not accelerate the City's requirement for matching funds; and, WHEREAS, the Mayor and the City Commission find that it is in the public interest to accept such a payment and to establish a street improvements trust fund for the Hometown District which recognizes funds that may be used for Sunset Drive and funds that may only be used for other streets in the Hometown District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The City Administration is hereby instructed to initiate negotiations for a present value (amortized) payment of the financial obligations of the developer of Bakery Centre which total $750,000 and which are required under Resolution 70 -95 -9619 and Resolution No. 145 -96 -9899. Final approval of any negotiated payment amount is reserved to the City Commission by resolution. Section 2. This resolution regarding instructions shall take effect immediately upon approval. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of August, 1997. ATTEST: CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED: Amortization Instructions Resolution: August 19, 1997 c:\ ... \ reports \ Monitor BC #2. doe 2 /b