Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
07-29-03
CITY COMMISSION AGENDA City Commission Meeting Meeting date: July 29, 2003 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, FL Next Regular Meeting Date: August 5, 2003 Phone: (305) 663 -6340 Time: 7 :30 PM City of South Miami Ordinance No. 10 -00 -1712 requires all lobbyists before engaging in ` any lobbying activities to register with the City Clerk and pay an annual fee of $125.00. This applies to all persons who are retained (whether paid or not) to represent a business entity or organization to influence "City" action. "City" action is broadly described to include the ranking and selection of professional consultants, and virtually all- legislative, quasi - judicial and administrative action. It does not apply to not -for- profit organizations, local chamber and merchant groups, homeowner associations, or trade associations and unions, CALL TO ORDER: A. Roll Call: B. Invocation C. Pledge of Allegiance: D. Presentation(s)7:00 p.m. 1. All America City - City of Miami Beach 2. Parks & Recreation 3. Officer of the Month ITEMS (S) FOR THE COMMISSION'S CONSIDERATION: 1. Approval of Minutes - July 22, 2003 REGULAR 'CITY COMMISSION AGENDA - July 29, 2003 1 2. City Manager's Report 3. City Attorney's Report PUBLIC REMARKS (5- minute limit) CONSENT AGENDA 4. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO ATTORNEYS' FEES; APPROVING PAYMENT OF ATTORNEYS' FEES FOR KURZBAN KURZBAN WEINGER & TETZELI, P.A. IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,667.86; CHARGING $4,667.86 TO ACCOUNT NO. 1500 -514 - 3450, OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE 3/5 (City Attorney) ORDINANCE (S) SECOND READING PUBLIC HEARING (S) None ORDINANCE (S) FIRST READING PUBLIC HEARING (S) 5. AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING; TO THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, AMENDING SECTION 20- 3.5E ENTITLED "DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS - SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT" IN ORDER TO ADDRESS LOT OVERCROWDING AND TO PROVIDE FOR APPROPRIATE SCALED DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,. 3/5 (City Manager) RESOLUTION (S) /PUBLIC HEARING (S) 6. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR & CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO A REQUEST FOR A WAIVER OF PLAT PURSUANT TO SECTION 20- 4.2(B) OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND SECTION 28 -4 OF THE COUNTY CODE, REGARDING THE PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE RS -2, "SEMI - ESTATE RESIDENTIAL," LOCATED AT 5243 SW 63P11 COURT, SOUTH MIAMI FLORIDA 33155; PROVIDING FOR BONDING' PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 -9 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES; REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 2 AGENDA - July 29, 2003 PROVIDING FOR A LEGAL DESCRIPTION; AND, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 (City Manager) 7. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, RELATING TO A REQUEST PURSUANT TO SECTION 20 -10.6 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR A SPECIAL USE APPROVAL TO PLACE A STEALTH CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6330 S.W. 40TH ST.(BIRD RD.) WITHIN THE "PI ", PUBLIC/ INSTITUTIONAL ZONING DISTRICT PROVIDING`' FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 4/5 (City Manager) RESOLUTION (S) 8. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE CITY'S 2003/2004 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET; ADVISING THE MIAMI -DADE. COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER OF ITS PROPOSED MILLAGE RATE OF MILLS; ITS ROLL -BACK RATE OF 5.832 MILLS AND ANNOUNCING THE DATES OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE PROPOSED MILLATE RATE AND TENTATIVE BUDGET; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE' DATE. 3/5 (City Manager) 9. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLOP THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUT INC. FOR DOWNTOWN IMPROVER AT AN AMOUNT OF $635,6! DEPARTMENT OF COMMER( ADMINISTRATION GRANT, SOL DISTRICT GRANT, US HUD EC( GRANT AND THE US ENVIRONK & TRIBAL GRANT ACCOUNT NU! 0000- 132 -2060, 001- 0000 -!: PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE (City )A, RELATING TO AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT WITH PETRO HYDRO, 9TS - PHASE II CONSTRUCTION .00 TO BE CHARGED TO US , ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT I FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT OMIC DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE TAL PROTECTION AGENCY STATE ERS' 001- 0000- 132 -2062, 001- 2 -2063, 001- 0000 -132 -2061; )ATE 3/5 10. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ISSUE A SERVICE WORK ORDER TO CORZO CASTELLA CARBALLO 'THOMPSON SALMAN, P.A. (C3TS) FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES FOR THE DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE II, IN AN AMOUNT OF $45,240.00` TO BE CHARGED TO SOUTH FLORIDA WATER REGULAR CITY COMMISSION AGENDA - July 29, 2003 3 MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, US HUD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE GRANT AND THE US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY STATE & TRIBAL GRANT ACCOUNT NOUMBERS 001-00-00 - 132 -2060, 001 -0000- 132 - 2063, 001- 0000- 132- 2061; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 (City Manager) 11. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND 'CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A,PROFESSIONAL SERVICE WORK ORDER WITH 'KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR SERVICES OF DATA COLLECTION, SURVEY /TESTING, DRAINAGE DESIGN, PRE - CONSTRUCTION AND CONSTRUCTION PHASES FOR CITYWIDE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS (4800 BLOCK OF 'SW 64" ST., SW 4 9T ST., SW 49TH TERR.) , IN AN AMOUNT OF $49,550' TO BE CHARGED TO SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT GRANT ACCOUNT 001- 0000- 132 -2060; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 (City Manager) 12. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE AMENDMENT OF THE 2002/03 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET TO COVER A PROJECTED SHORTFALL OF $703,812; RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 90 -03- 11639;: AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO UTILIZE CASH RESERVES IN THE AMOUNT OF ';$73,125 TO REIMBURSE EMPLOYEES FOR CONTRIBUTIONS FOR INSURANCE PREMIUMS TO ACCOMMODATE FISCAL YEAR 2002/03 BUDGET; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE 4/5 (City Manager) 13. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO ELECTIONS; REQUESTING THE MIAMI -DADE COUNTY MANAGER ENSURE THAT, REGARDLESS OF VOTING SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, THERE IS PRODUCED A PAPER RECORD OF EVERY BALLOT CAST, AS AN ELEMENT OF MINIMUM STANDARDS OF INTEGRITY, NOT LATER THAN THE 2004 GENERAL ELECTION PROCESS, AND SUPPORTING THE PROPOSED MIAMI -DADE COUNTY RESOLUTION REQUIRING FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THE HELP AMERICA VOTE ACT OF 2002 (HAVA); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 (Commissioner McCrea) ORDINANCE (S) FIRST READING (S) REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 4 AGENDA - July 29, 2003 SPEAKERS PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT SECTION 2-2.1(k)(2) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES PROVIDES THAT "ANY PERSON MAKING PERSONAL IMPERTINENT,_ OR SLANDEROUS REMARKS OR WHO SHALL BECOME BOISTEROUS WHILE ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION SHALL BE FORTHWITH BARRED FROM FURTHER AUDIENCE BEFORE THE COUNCIL BY THE PRESIDING OFFICER, UNLESS PERMISSION TO CONTINUE BE GRANTED BY A MAJORITY VOTE OF THE COMMISSION. •• COMMISSION REMARKS PURSUANT TO FLA STATUTES 266.0105,, -THE CITY HEREBY ADVISES THE PUBLIC THAT IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THIS BOARD, AGENCY OR COMMISSION WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT ITS MEETING OR HEARING, HE OR SHE WILL NEED A:RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, AND THAT FOR 'SUCH 'PURPOSE, AFFECTED PERSON MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. THIS NOTICE DOES NOT CONSTITUTES CONSENT BY THE CITY FOR THE INTRODUCTION OR ADMISSION OR OTHERWISE INADMISSIBLE OR IRRELEVANT EVIDENCE, NOR DOES IT AUTHORIZE CHALLENGES OR APPEALS NOT OTHERWISE ALLOWED BY LAW: REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 5 AGENDA July 29, 2003 1 City of South Miami 2 Regular City Commission Minutes 3 July 22, 2003 4 T 5 CALL TO ORDER: 6 7 The City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida, met 8 in regular session on Tuesday, July 22, 2003 at 6:15 p.m., in the 9 City Commission Chambers, 6130 Sunset Drive. As required by State 10 law, the meeting was immediately recessed after roll call was 11 taken in order for the Commission members, city manager and city 12 attorney to meet in an Attorney - Client Session. The Commission 13 meeting was reconvened at 7:36 p.m. 14 15 A. Roll Call: 16 The following members of the City Commission were present: 17 Mayor Horace G. Feliu, Vice Mayor Mary Scott Russell, 18 Commissioner Randy G. Wiscombe, Commissioner David D. Bethel and 19 Commissioner Dan McCrea. 20 21 'Also in attendance were: City Manager Maria V. Davis, City 22 Attorney Earl G. Gallop and City Clerk Ronetta Taylor. 23 24 B. Invocation: 25 Commissioner Bethel delivered the Invocation. 26 27 C. Pledge of Allegiance: 28 The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison. 29 30 D. Presentation(s)7:00 p.m. 31 1. Police Department - Officer of the Month: 32 33 Officer Joe Duran was honored as Officer of the Month for 34 November 2002. During that month he had numerous arrests, 35 including a suspicious vehicle which he observed leaving a high 36 narcotics area and turned out to be stolen. He also had several 37 narcotics arrests and took a significant amount of narcotics off 38 the street, including one arrest that yielded 81 baggies of crack 39 cocaine as well as 8 baggies of marijuana. The person in 40 possession was also a - career criminal who had numerous previous 41 arrests, including robbery. 42 43 Officer Rich Munoz was honored as Officer of the Month for 44 December 2002. In two separate instances he made narcotics 45 arrests and confiscated 20 baggies of crack cocaine as well as 46 marijuana and drug paraphernalia. He also was instrumental in 47 locating two subjects who had robbed a juvenile and made the 48 apprehension with such expediency that the property was still in 49 the possession of the men arrested and returned to the victim. 50 However, the highlight of this officer's performance for the REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 1 MINUTES - July 22, 2003 1 month was on December 23, 2002. He was sent to a "man down" call 2 at Dante Fascell Park's tennis court. Upon his arrival he found 3 the victim to be in cardiac arrest. He began CPR and, with the 4 assistance of other officers, was able to restore a pulse. Fire 5 Rescue personnel_ arrived and continued life support activities. 6 The victim recovered and was released from the hospital. A life 7 was saved due to Officer Munoz's calm and professional actions. 8 9 Officer Rod Everett was named a Co- Officer of the Month for 10 December 2002. He is the Police Department's Police Athletic 11 League coordinator and advisor. As such he provides a unique and 12 valuable contribution to the community. This became quite evident 13 when the South Miami Grey Ghosts,, 110 pound division, beat 14 football teams from around the county, then around the state and 15 finally from around the country to bring home the first ever 16 National Championship for South Miami. As a direct result of his 17 efforts the City of South Miami is now able to boast of having 18 the best Division Two 110 pound team in the entire United States.. 19 20 Vice Mayor Russell was presented with a cake on behalf of 21 her birthday. 22 23 ITEMS (S) FOR THE COMMISSION'S CONSIDERATION: 24 25 1. Approval of Minutes - Regular Meeting 6/03/03 26 Moved by Commissioner Bethel, seconded by Vice Mayor Russell 27 to approve the minutes as presented. 28 29 There, being no discussion the motion passed by a 5 -0 vote. 30 31 Commissioner Wiscombe: Yea 32 Vice Mayor Russell: Yea 33 Commissioner McCrea: Yea 34 Commissioner Bethel: Yea 35 Mayor Feliu: Yea 36 37 - Special Meeting 6/17/03 38 Moved by Commissioner Bethel, seconded by Vice Mayor Russell 39 to approve the minutes as presented. 40 41 There, being no discussion the motion passed by a 5 -0 vote. 42 43 Vice Mayor Russell: Yea 44 Commissioner McCrea: Yea 45 Commissioner Bethel Yea 46 Commissioner Wiscombe: Yea 47 Mayor Feliu: Yea 48 49 2. City Manager's Report 50 a. Comparative Salary study on all office, professional, 51 exempt, and executive positions in City of South Miami REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 2 MINUTES - July 22, 2003 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 (requested by Mayor Feliu). Manager Davis provided a comparative - salary study. She emphasized that it was crucial for the Commission to recognize that the survey should not be used as an accurate reflection of comparable position salaries. In order to obtain a truly accurate salary survey, a very comprehensive study `'of classifications and duties per position would be required. b. Report -- summary presentation by Public Works Department on North End Traffic Study. (requested by Commissioner McCrea). A brief power point presentation depicting the analysis of traffic data for the Northside Neighborhood was done by 'a Kimley -Horn and Associates, representative. The ,analysis recommended traffic calming improvements in order to notify drivers that they were in a residential environment, and to improve neighborhood liability and quality of life. Manager Davis took this opportunity to thank everyone for their warm welcome and show of support. Mayor Feliu acknowledged former State Representative John Cosgrove and former City of South Miami Vice Mayor and City Commissioner R. Paul Young sitting in the audience. There, being no further questions or comments for the City Manager, this report concluded. 3. City Attorney's Report Attorney Gallop announced that the Commission had met in an Attorney - Client Session prior to this Commission meeting to discuss Mark Richman Properties, Inc. v. City of South Miami; Rosenbaum v. City of South Miami, et al; Maria Anduiza v. City of South Miami; and, City of South Miami v. Jane E. Bruce, T.R. and Joseph M. Bruce. Attorney Gallop explained that. four of the items on tonight's agenda were approving Attorney's fees for outside special counsels. The City has recovered from the Florida League of Cities the sum of $24,000 for Attorney's Fees in defending the City against the EEOC Claims for 2001/02. At of that amount $17,400 was credited to this year's City Attorney's Account and $6,600 was credited to prior year's account. Attorney Gallop reported that the City has received an excellent letter from Attorney Stokes, the City's Labor Counsel concerning the certification the White Collar Union. The election occurred July 8th. The union was recognized by PERC on July 24th following the election. Attorney Gallop reported on the recent 3rd District Court Decision Metropolitan, Inc. vs. City of Miami Beach, which related to concurrency. This development provides for a cause REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MINUTES - July 22, 2003 3 1 of action against a government agency that takes an action that 2 imposes on private property rights. 3 4 Attorney Gallop reported an Act enacted by the Governor's 5 office which prescribes conduct by city officials that falsify 6 official records, tamper with bids, discloses information 7 concerning the bids that is not public information, seeking to 8 circumvent public bidding process, seeking, to influence 9 selecting committees, etc. The conduct described offenses the 10 scope of the Cone of Silence. 11 12 Attorney Gallop reported that he'd received a letter from 13 Miami Dade County Ethics and Public Trust, which was directed to 14 Mr. Mel Haber concerning the Red Light Project. The letter 15 essentially advises Mr. Haber that he violated the City's 16 Lobbying Ordinance by a presentation prior to registering 17 ,making as a lobbyist. Prosecution is not going pursued because he as 18 since registered. 19 20 After there were no questions or comments for the City 21 Attorney, this report concluded 22 23 Mayor Feliu took a moment to make comments about the 24 negative press coverage being received concerning the City's 25 Budget'. He related that the City has a sound budget and is 26 fiscal solvent. 27 28 PUBLIC REMARKS , 30 David Tucker, Sr., appeared before the City Commission to 31 share his views and history with regard to the American 32 Revolution. 33 34 Peggy Brodeur appeared before the City Commission to express 35 concern with the construction taking place at the Mandelstam 36 property. She provided pictures showing the dump trucks blocking 37 her driveway at 8:45 a.m. 38 39 Aurora Dela Rosa appeared before the City Commission to 40 express concern with the construction taking place at the 41 Mandelstam property. She further indicated that the activity at 42 the Mandelstam property is causing massive parking and traffic 43 problems in her neighborhood. 44 45 Ms. Brodeur and Ms. Dela Rosa were instructed to set up 46 appointments with the City Manager to further discuss their 47 concerns. 48 49 Levy Kelly appeared before the City Commission to 50 congratulate Maria Davis on her appointment as City Manager. He 51 encouraged the Commission to support the City's dedicated REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 4 MINUTES - July 22, 2003 1 employees, and called upon all to come together for the 2 betterment of the Community. 3 4 Bob Welsh appeared before the City Commission to express his 5 views about lot build -outs. He suggested that the Commission 6 consider adopting an ordinance addressing downsizing. 7 8 Cal Rosenbaum appeared before the City Commission to 9 congratulate Maria Davis on her appointment as City Manager. He 10 further conveyed his support for freedom of the press. 11 12 Frank Cuzzacrea, Jr. appeared before the City Commission 13 representing the City's Community Relations Board's issue of 14 putting trust back into City government. 15 16 Dick Ward appeared before the City Commission to commend 17 Mayor Feliu on his opening statement. He indicated that the City 18 hasn't had any positive press on the City's finances for several 19 months. He further conveyed that the Commission needed to work 20 on consistency. He also expressed concern with the over usage of 21 the Dante Fascell Parking lot by individuals visiting the 22 Mandelstam facility. 23 24 Sharon McCann appeared before the City Commission to thank 25 the Commission and administration for implementing the 26 Residential Decal Parking program. She further commented that 27 South Miami was in the process of acquiring Doctor's Hospital, 28 which indicates a sound financial base and opined that South 29 Miami Hospital should be giving more to the community. She 30 further requested that an audit covering the last three years be 31 done in the Planning and Zoning Department, and volunteered Jay 32 Beckman for the task. 33 34 Joanne Myers appeared before the City Commission to address 35 rumors about the soon to be termination of Police Chief Cokes 36 Watson. She encouraged the Commission that if rumors are true, 37 to rethink their decision. 38 39 Rodney Williams appeared before the City Commission to 40 express concern about a South Miami youth that received a ticket 41 for jaywalking. He emphasized that the kids have to cross that 42 street in order to get to the park. He further congratulated and 43 welcomed Maria Davis as City Manager. 44 45 Terry Huggins appeared before the City Commission to express 46 his concerns about the hiring process for the new City Manager. 47 48 Valerie Newman Hurley appeared before the City Commission to 49 defend the City'Manager Selection process. 50 51 CONSENT AGENDA 52 REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MINUTES - July 22, 2003 5 1 RESOLUTION NO. 106 -03 -11655 2 4. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE 3 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO AUTHORIZATION 4 OF THE CITY MANAGER AS SIGNATORY IN CITY BANK ACCOUNTS; 5 PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 6 (City Manager) 7 8 RESOLUTION NO. 107 -03- 11656 9 5. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE 10 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY 11 MANAGER TO APPROVE THE USE OF GRANT FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT 12 OF $4,384.65; CHARGING THE DISBURSEMENT TO ACCOUNT 13 NUMBER 001- 0000- 132- 2051, ENTITLED -SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD 14 15 PARKS ", TO PAY THE REMAINING CLOSING COSTS IN THE ACQUISITION OF THE EAST 1/3 OF THE 'PROPERTY LOCATED AT 16 7800 S.W. 59th AVENUE, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE "HAMMOCK 17 HOUSE "; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 18 (City Manager) 19 20 RESOLUTION NO. 108 -03- 11657 21 6. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE 22 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO ATTORNEYS' 23 FEES; APPROVING PAYMENT OF ATTORNEYS' FEES FOR KURZBAN 24 KURZEAN WEINGER & TETZELI, P.A. IN THE AMOUNT OF 25 $2,074.49; CHARGING $2,074.49 TO ACCOUNT NO. 1500 -514- 26 3450, OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES; PROVIDING AN 27 EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 28 (City Attorney) 29 30 RESOLUTION NO. 109 -03 -11658 31 7. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR 'AND 'CITY COMMISSION OF THE 32 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO ATTORNEYS' 33 FEES; APPROVfiNG PAYMENT OF ATTORNEYS' FEES FOR 34 GREENBERG TRAURIG P.A., IN THE AMOUNT OF $534.50; 35 CHARGING ;$534.50 TO ACCOUNT NQ. 1500 -514 -3450, OTHER 36 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE3 /5 37 (City Attorney) 38 39 RESOLUTION NO. 110 -03- 11659 40 8. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE 41 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO ATTORNEYS' 42 FEES; APPROVING ATTORNEYS' FEES FOR GREENBERG TRAURIG, 43 P.A., IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,074.42; CHARGING $2,074.42 TO 44 ACCOUNT NO. 1500 - 514 -3450, OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES; 45 PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 46, (City Attorney) 47 48 RESOLUTION NO. 111- 03- 11660- 49 9. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE 50 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO ATTORNEYS' REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 6 MINUTES - July 22, 2003 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 FEES AND COSTS; APPROVING PAYMENT OF ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS FOR NAGIN GALLOP FIGUEREDO, P.A. IN THE AMOUNT OF $16,826.20 CHARGING $1,872.50 TO ACCOUNT NO. 1500-514-3435, REAL PROPERTY/ FORECLOSURE; CHARGING $13,229.`99 TO ACCOUNT NO. 1500 -514- 3410, LEGAL SERVICES, NON- RETAINER; CHARGING $753.50 TO ACCOUNT NO. 615 -1910- 521 - 3100, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, FORFEITURES; AND CHARGING $970.21 TO ACCOUNT NO. 1500 514 -3452; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 (City Attorney) RESOLUTION NO. 112 -03- 11661 10. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO ATTORNEYS' FEES APPROVING ATTORNEYS' FEES FOR NAGIN GALLOP FIGUEREDO, P.A. IN THE AMOUNT OF $23,485.95; CHARGING $8,417.50 TO ACCOUNT NO. 1500 - 514 -3435, REAL PROPERTY /FORECLOSURE; CHARGING $13,796.45 TO ACCOUNT NO. 1500 - 514 -3410, LEGAL SERVICES, NON- RETAINER CHARGING $157.50 TO ACCOUNT NO. 615- 1910- 521 - 3100, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, FORFEITURES AND CHARGING $1,114.50 TO ACCOUNT NO. 1500 -514 -3452, CODE ENFORCEMENT PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 (City Attorney) Moved by Commissioner McCrea, seconded by Commissioner Wiscombe to approve the Consent Agenda. There, being no discussion the motion to approve the Consent Agenda, passed by a 4 -0 vote Commissioner Wiscombe: Yea Vice Mayor Russell: Out of room Commissioner McCrea Yea Commissioner Bethel: Yea Mayor Feliu: Yea ORDINANCE (S) SECOND READING PUBLIC HEARING (S) None RESOLUTION (S) /PUBLIC' HEARING (S) None RESOLUTION (S)_, 11. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE MULTIPURPOSE CENTER;. ACCEPTING DONATION OF ALL FITNESS EQUIPMENT FROM SOUTH MIAMI HOSPITAL AS A GIFT TO THE REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MINUTES - July 22, 2003 7 1 CITY'S PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT TO BE USED IN THE 2 FITNESS CENTER OF THE MULTIPURPOSE CENTER; PROVIDING 3 FOR PROVISIONS SET FORTH BY SOUTH MIAMI HOSPITAL; 4 PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 5 (Mayor Feliu) 6 7 Moved by Mayor Feliu, seconded by Commissioner McCrea to 8 defer this item until the August 5, 2003 meeting. 9 10 There, being no discussion the motion to defer passed by a 11 4 -0 vote. 12 13 Vice Mayor Russell: Out of room 14 Commissioner McCrea: Yea 15 Commissioner Bethel: Yea 16 Commissioner Wiscombe: Yea 17 Mayor Feliu: Yea 18 19 RESOLUTION NO. 113 -03 -11662 20 12. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE 21 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA AUTHORIZING THE CITY 22 MANAGER TO OBTAIN BIDS FOR A PROPERTY APPRAISAL FOR 23 CITY -OWNED PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5890 SW, 69 STREET, ALSO 24 KNOWN AS THE INSPECTION STATION SITE; PROVIDING AN 25 EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 26 (Mayor Feliu) 27 28 Moved by Commissioner Bethel, seconded by Commissioner 29 McCrea to approve this item. 30 31 Manager Davis explained that this would authorize 32 administration to get bids for a property appraisal for city - 33 owned property known as the old inspection site. 34 35 Commissioner McCrea indicated that he was not in favor of 36 selling off city property. There is a lot of new development 37 going up in this area. The property value for this particular 38 site will be increase due to this new development. 39 40 Vice Mayor Russell clarified that this is only for a 41 property appraisal, and not the actual selling of the property. 42 43 At the conclusion of this discussion the motion to approve 44 passed by a 4 -1 vote. 45 46 Commissioner McCrea: Nay 47 Commissioner Bethel: Yea 48 Commissioner Wiscombe: Yea 49 Vice Mayor Russell: Yea 50 Mayor Feliu: Yea 51 REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 8 MINUTES - July 22, 2003 1 RESOLUTION NO. 114 -03 -11663 2 13. A- RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE 3 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY 4 MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH 5 MIAMI -DADE COUNTY FOR DISTRIBUTION OF CHARTER COUNTY 6 TRANSIT SYSTEM SURTAX' PROCEEDS LEVIED BY 'MIAMI -DADE 7 COUNTY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 8 (City Manager) 9 10 Moved by Commissioner McCrea, seconded by Vice Mayor 11 Russell to approve this item. 12 13 Mr. Balogun indicated that the City will receive on a pro 14 rata basis upon the ration the City's population bears to the 15 total population in all eligible cities. The city is required 16 to apply the entire portion of the City's share to supplement, 17 not replace, city's general fund support for transportation and 18 transit purposes.` 19 20 At the conclusion of this discussion the motion to approve 21 passed by a 5 -0 vote. 22 23 Commissioner Bethel: Yea 24 Commissioner Wiscombe Yea 25 Vice Mayor Russell: Yea 26 Commissioner McCrea: Yea 27 Mayor Feliu: Yea 28 29 14. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE 30 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO AUTHORIIZING 31 THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT, WITH T.J. 32 PAVEMENT CORP. FOR BOAT LAUNCH RAMP (SW 65TH AVENUE & 33 SW 68TH STREET) AT AN AMOUNT OF $14,500 TO BE CHARGED 34 TO STORMWATER TRUST FUND, CONTRACTURAL SERVICES ACCOUNT 35 NO. 111- 1730 - 541 -3450; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 36 (City Manager) 3/5 37 38 Moved by Vice Mayor Russell, seconded by Commissioner 39 Bethel to approve this item. 40 41 Mr. Balogun indicated that the City's canal system is 42 separated into 'segments" by major roadway crossings, which 43 makes it difficult for boats to crossover to service other parts 44 of the canal. During the community meeting held about the boat 45 ramp, with the residents on August 17, 2002 and November 1, 46 2002, the proposed location of the ramp and design concept were 47 recommended and agreed to by the residents. 48 49 Christopher Cooke- Yarborough was afforded an opportunity to 50 express his opposition to the location of the boat ramp. 51 REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 9 MINUTES - July 22, 2003 1 Commissioner Wiscombe indicated that he had previously 2 discussed the issue of boat ramps, and had outlined to prior 3 administration the issues he wanted to see addressed. He said 4 those issues are not addressed in this proposal therefore he has 5 some real concerns with moving forward with this matter. 6 7 Commissioner McCrea voiced concerned with the issues raised 8 by Mr. Cooke - Yarborough. 9 10 At the conclusion of this discussion, the motion to approve 11 failed by a 2 -3 vote. 12 13 Commissioner Bethel: Yea 14 Commissioner Wiscombe: Nay 15 Vice Mayor Russell: Nay 16 Commissioner McCrea: Nay 17 Mayor Feliu: Yea 18 19 RESOLUTION NO. 115 -03- 11664 20 15. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE 21 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA RELATED" TO 2002 -2003 22 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO 23 FILL TWO RECENTLY VACATED POSITIONS, AUTO MECHANIC AND 24 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE WORKER II, NOTHWITHSTANDING THE 25 CURRENT HIRING FREEZE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.3 /5 26 (City Manager) 27 28 Moved by Vice Mayor Russell, seconded by Commissioner Bethel 29 to approve this item. 30 31 Manager Davis said this would allow the two recently vacated 32 positions in the public works department to be filled. 33 34 At the conclusion of this discussion -, the motion to approve 35 passed by a 4 -0 vote. 36 37 Commissioner Wiscombe: Yea 38 Vice Mayor Russell: Yea 39 Commissioner McCrea: Out of room 40 Commissioner Bethel: Yea 41 Mayor Feliu: Yea 42 43 RESOLUTION NO. 116 -03 -11665 44 16. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE 45 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA RELATED TO 2002 -2003 46 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO 47 HIRE FOR PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR AND PLANNING 48 DIRECTOR; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 49 (City Manager) 50 REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MINUTES - July 22, 2003 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 Moved by Vice Mayor Russell, seconded by Commissioner Wiscombe to approve this item. Manager Davis indicated that this would allow for the hiring of two director positions. At the conclusion of this discussion, the motion to approve passed by a 4 -0 vote. Vice Mayor Russell Yea Commissioner McCrea: Out of room Commissioner Bethel: Yea Commissioner Wiscombe: Yea Mayor Feliu: Yea RESOLUTION NO. 117 -03 -11666 17. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO MODIFYING RESOLUTION NO. 167 -01 -11315 AND, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 (City manager) Moved by Vice Mayor Russell, seconded by Commissioners Wiscombe and Bethel to'approve this item. Mr. Basu indicated that Resolution No. 167 -01- 11315, adopted November 6, 2001 indicated that funds for the Miami Dade Water and Sewer Department fees for the Multipurpose Center Phase II building to be charged to Safe Neighborhood Fund. The fee was assessed in the amount of $32,142.75 for a combined water and sewer connection - charge. The majority of the Safe Neighborhood Grant Fund has been allocated to the construction of the building. The City currently receives additional funding for infrastructure construction through the US EPA State Tribal Assistant Grant (STAG). This funding is available for water main related expenditures and the proposed charge is an allowable expenditure. This resolution would authorize the City Manager to charge Water and Sewer fee to the US EPA (STAG) fund Account No. 0`01- 0000 -132- 2061. At the conclusion of this discussion, the motion to approve passed by a 4 -0 vote. Commissioner McCrea: Out of room Commissioner Bethel Yea Commissioner Wiscombe: Yea Vice Mayor Russell: Yea Mayor Feliu: Yea RESOLUTION NO. 118-03-11667 18. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MINUTES - July 22, 2003 11 1 ENTER INTO A TWO -YEAR CONTRACT WITH RENEWALS OF THREE - 2 YEARS (ONE YEAR INCREMENTS) WITH STROYNE BROTHERS 3 SOUTH, INC., RELATING TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE 4 COMPREHENSIVE PARKING PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF SOUTH 5 MIAMI PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 6 (City Manager) 7 8 Moved by Vice Mayor Russell, seconded by Commissioners 9 Wiscombe and Bethel to approve this item. 10 11 Orlando Martinez the City's Assistant City Manager explained 12 the process used to determine the selected qualified bidder. He 13 indicated that the other .bidder _did not offer the services 14 outlined in the RFP within the State of Florida. 15 16 Frank Pintado, one of the bidders on this program was 17 afforded an opportunity to comment on this item, and to object to 18 the process used to determine the recommended company. 19 20 Attorney John Cosgrove representing Stroyne Brothers South, 21 Inc., was also an opportunity to comment on the item and the 22. process used to determine the recommended company. He encouraged 23 the Commission to support the City Manager's recommendation. 24 25 Vice Mayor Russell indicated that she'd not had an 26 opportunity to thoroughly go over the information provided, and 27 would prefer to defer the item. 28 29 All other Commission members indicated that they'd reviewed 30 the information provided, and was ready to make a decision. 31 32 Vice Mayor Russell related that her vote was in no way a 33 negative on the part of the recommended company. She conveyed 34 that she wanted more time to review the material provided. 35 36 At the conclusion of this discussion, the motion to approve 37 passed by -a 4 -1 vote. 38 39 Commissioner Bethel: Yea 40 Commissioner Wiscombe: Yea 41 Vice Mayor Russell: Nay 42 Commissioner McCrea: Yea 43 Mayor Feliu Yea 44 45 ORDINANCE (S) FIRST READING (S) 47 19. AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE 48 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA AMENDING THE CITY OF SOUTH 49 MIAMI PENSION PLAN,, PROVIDING FOR AN INCENTIVE FOR 50 EARLY RETIREMENT FOR CERTAIN EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF 51 SOUTH MIAMI TO INCLUDE A RULE OF SEVENTY (70`), PURCHASE REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 12 MINUTES July 22, 2003 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 OF PRIOR SERVICE AND AN ADDITIONAL FIVE PERCENT (5/%) BENEFIT ON RETIREMENT WITHIN A SPECIFIED PERIOD OF TIME; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (Vice Mayor Russell) 3/5 Moved by Vice Mayor Russell, seconded by Commissioner Wiscombe to defer this item. There, being no discussion on the motion to defer passed by a 5 -0 vote. Commissioner Wiscombe: Yea Vice Mayor Russell: Yea Commissioner McCrea: Yea Commissioner Bethel: Yea Mayor Feliu: Yea COMMISSION REMARKS Each Commission member was afforded an opportunity for comments, with Commissioner Bethel announcing the planning of a March against drugs scheduled for August 1, 2003. After there was no other business to come before this Body, the meeting adjourned at 10 :15 p.m., with Mayor Feliu delivering inspirational parting words. Approved: Attest: Ronetta Taylor, CMC City Clerk REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 13 MINUTES - July 22, 2003 Horace G. Feliu Mayor CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI vINTER- OFFICE MEMORANDUM j i To: Mayor and city comm'n Date: July 23, 2003 Cc: Maria V. Davis, city manager Hakeem Oshikoya, finance director From: Earl G. Gallop, city atto7m e: Resolution Approving Attorneys' Fees and Costs to Kurzban, Kurzban, Weinger & Tetzeli, P.A. July 2003 Statement Subject: Payment of $4,667.86 (Invoice No. 9196 dated June 30, 2003) to Kurzban Kurzban Weinger & Tetzeli, P.A. for services rendered in defense of Mark Richman Properties, Inc. v. City of South Miami, Case No. 03-07058-CA-24 (Fla. l lt" Cir. Ct. 2003). Discussion: Mark Richman Properties, Inc. initiated litigation against the city in which it seeks specific performance under a lease agreement and, or, $4.5 million in damages for an alleged breach of contract pertaining to the proposed development of the SW 73rd Street parking lot. With the city commission's consent, the city attorney retained special litigation counsel to defend against the action. This is the third invoice from special litigation counsel. The total billed to date is $10,569.15. I recommend approval of the invoice for payment as the amount of fees and costs are reasonable and necessary. Recommendation: Approve the resolution authorizing payment of the invoice. i CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida 33143 Vendor: Kurzban Kurzban Weinger & Tetzeli, P.A. Req. No. 149 Date: July 23 2003 " Finance Department TOTAL $4,667.86 Purchase Order No. Terms /Discount' I Hereby Certify That The Coding of Accounts Approved Purchases as Above Approved Above Material, Equipment, and Issuance of Purchase Order Or Service Is Essential And A Authorized Proper Request Against The Codes Charge Sufficiency of Appropriation Balances Verified (Except As Otherwise Noted) Head of Department Finance Department City Manager KURZBAN KURZBAN`WEINGER & TETZELI, P.A. 2650 SOUTHWEST 27TH AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 (305) 444- 0060 TOTAL BALANCE DUE $10,569.15 R PAGE: 1 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 06/30/03 C /0. EARL!E. GALLOP, ESQ, CLIENT NO: 3917 -0001M 3225 AVIATION AVENUE, SUITE 301 STATEMENT NO: 9196 MIAMI, FL 33133 MARK RICHMAN PROPERTIES, INC. VS. CITY OF S. MIAMI RATE HOURS 06/02/03 HT TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH JIM WING AND CONFERENCE WITH'SMW 250.00 0.25 62.50 06/05/03 HT RESEARCH /DRAFT MEMO OF LAW 250.00 3.70 925.00 06/06/03 HT DRAFT /RESEARCH /EDIT MEMO OF LAW RE DAMAGES 250.00 4.00 11000.00. 06/09/03 HT RESEARCH AND EDITS TO MEMO OF LAW 250.00 2.20 550.00 06/11/03 HT FINALYZED MEMO AND DRAFT LETTER TO COUNSEL FOR CLIENT (GALLUP) 250.00 1.00,. 250.00 06/13 /03 HT CORRECTION, EDITS TO MEMO OF LAW AND CONFERENCE WITH SMW 250.00 1.50 375.00 FOR ,CURRENT SERVICES RENDERED 12.65 3,162.50' EXPENSES 06/18/03 PHOTOCOPY CHARGE 2.40 06/18/03 POSTAGE 0.83 TOTAL EXPENSES 3.23 ADVANCES 06/01/03 WEST GROUP - LEGAL RESEARCH 304.69 06/01/03 WEST GROUP - LEGAL RESEARCH 233.73 06/01/03 WEST GROUP - LEGAL RESEARCH 963.71 j' TOTAL ADVANCES 1,502.13 TOTAL CURRENT FEES & EXPENSES 4,667.86 PREVIOUS BALANCE $5,901.29 TOTAL BALANCE DUE $10,569.15 R IWO 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION 4 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO 5 ATTORNEYS' FEES; APPROVING. PAYMENT OF 6 ATTORNEYS' <FEES FOR KURZBAN KURZBAN WEINGER 7 TETZELI,' P.A. IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,667.86; CHARGING 8 $4,667.86 TO ACCOUNT NO. 1500- 514 - 3450, OTHER 9 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE 10 DATE. 11 12 WHEREAS, Mark Richman Properties, Inc.. initiated litigation against the 13 City of South Miami in which it seeks specific performance under a lease 14 agreement and, or, damages for an alleged breach of contract pertaining to the 15 proposed development of the SW 73 Street parking lot; and, 16 17 WHEREAS, with the city commission's consent, the city attorney retained 18 special litigation counsel, Kurzban Kurzban Weinger & Tetzeli, P.A. to defend the 19 lawsuit and, 20 21 WHEREAS, Kurzban Kurzban Weinger & Tetzeli, ` P.A. submitted an 22 invoice to the city for legal services rendered, and costs advanced, for the period 23 ending June 30 2003, in the amount of $4,667.86; and, 24 25 WHEREAS, the city attorney recommends payment of the attached invoice 26 as the amount of fees and costs are reasonable and necessary. 27 28 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY 29 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: 30 31 Section 1. The invoice for attorneys' fees and costs received from 32 Kurzban Kurzban Weinger & Tetzeli, P.A. in the total amount of $4,667.86, is 33 approved for payment' and charging the amount to account' no. 1500 - 514- 3450, 34 Other Contractual Services, 35 36 Section 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon approval. 37 l 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of July, 2003. 3 4 _ATTEST: APPROVED: 5 6 7 ' CITY CLERK MAYOR 8 9 10 COMMISSION VOTE: 11 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mayor Feliu: 12 Vice Mayor Russell: 13 Commissioner Wiscombe: 14 CITY ATTORNEY Commissioner Bethel: 15 Commissioner McCrea: 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 \ \02srvplaw \prolaw\Documents \0022 \DAJ \18775.doc - Reso - Weinger July 2003 Statement 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI To: Honorable Mayor, Vice Mayor Date: July 29, 2003 and City Commission From: Maria V. Davis Agenda Item No. City Manager RE: Amending Land Development Code Section 20 -3.5E Dimensional Requirements Single- Family District ORDINANCE: AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, AMENDING SECTION 20 -3.5E ENTITLED "DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS - SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT" IN ORDER TO ADDRESS LOT OVERCROWDING AND TO PROVIDE FOR APPROPRIATE SCALED DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: In accordance with discussions at the City Commission and the Planning; Board attached you will find an amended ordinance to modify the Dimensional Requirements of Single Family Districts. "Mansionization" , "McMansion ", "Monster Homes" are some of the phrases used to identify the:,problem of large homes that tends to be the current trend. The issues related to these large homes are complex and multifaceted. A lot of communities are struggling to address the problem of these large homes being built with minimum setbacks and very little landscaping in the older neighborhoods that are characterized by the modest homes with generous setbacks and mature landscaping. Issues ranging from lack of design sensitivity to marketability to changing lifestyle and desire for more indoor space to maximizing return on the investment come into play when one talks about this issue. These "out -of- scale" homes do not fit in the neighborhood fabric and tend to overcrowd a neighborhood. However, the trend for bigger homes, among other factors, is a result of market conditions and demands on precious real estate. Proponents argue that they help improve older neighborhoods and "out -of- date" housing stocks. The proposed changes do not inhibit the redevelopment trends, nor do they limit any architectural creativity but simply attempt to address the issue of scale that is appropriate to a single family residential neighborhood. A two -story structure is inherently not the problem. The space between the structures, massing, architectural detailing of the exterior Lot overcrowding Single family dimensional requirement July 29, 2003 Page 2 of 2 walls, roof lines all contribute to the overall aesthetics and create the appropriate scale of a neighborhood. In drafting the changes, it is recognized that it may not be feasible to address all the concerns and develop a perfect ordinance, but we can start addressing some of the elements that create the feeling of overcrowding. The feeling of overcrowding is primarily caused by the two -story box -like structures built with minimum setbacks. Not only do they tend to overwhelm an adjacent single story home, they reduce the availability of light and air for the single story structure. Similarly, the space between large two story homes are not adequately open for light and air and contributes to lack of privacy. The proposed ordinance addresses two primary issues: side setbacks: the distance between the structures, and the massing of ` the two -story structure. The current setbacks can be maintained if a structure is one story in height. The proposed ordinance will require that the setbacks to be increased proportionate to the property size, if the structure is higher than one story except for RS5, where properties are smaller. This will enable one to either a) place a two story structure at the minimum set back line provided that the portion of the structure beyond the first floor level would be set back further in accordance with the proposed setback schedule or b) to place a two story structure up to the allowable height at the increased setback line. In an effort to reduce the impact of the box -like structures, the proposal limits the amount of the second floor, by 60% of the first floor, gross area. This allows opportunities to 'develop elevations that are more animated than straight two - story walls on all four sides. Table A (attached) provides a' comparative analysis of gross buildable areas between the existing and proposed ordinances.' PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION The staff believes' that these changes will have the most significant impact in addressing lot over crowding and are easily implemented. It should, however,' be noted that if these changes are adopted, the ordinance will create a significant number of non - conforming structures, which will continue to be legal pursuant to Section 20 -4.8. PLANNING BOARD ACTION The Planning Board adopted a motion by a vote of 6 -0, recommending that the proposed ordinance be transmitted to the City Commission for a public hearing (first reading). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Commission adopt the proposed ordinance on first reading. Prior to the item being scheduled for second reading the Planning Board will hold a required public hearing and provide a formal recommendation. Attachments: Proposed Ordinance Table A: Buildable Floor Area Analysis Section 20 -4.8 Nonconforming uses and structures Excerpts from Planning Board meetings: 3/25/03; 7/8/03 MVD/ SB K:\ Comm Items \2003 \07 -29 -03 \lot overcrowding report .doe ORDINANCE NO: AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, AMENDING SECTION 20 -3.5E ENTITLED "DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS- SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT" IN ORDER TO ADDRESS LOT OVERCROWDING AND TO PROVIDE FOR APPROPRIATE SCALED DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Commission has recently had discussions regarding the trend of large homes being built in the Residential Zoning Districts and wished to address this issue; and WHEREAS, these discussions centered upon the impacts of these large homes to the quality of the neighborhoods and the appropriateness of their scale to the surrounding area; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1 That Section 20- 3.5(E), entitled, "Dimensional Requirements Single Family District," of the South Miami Land Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 20- 3.5(E) DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS SINGLE - FAMILY DISTRICT REQUIREMENT RS -1 RS -2 RS -3 RS -4 RS -5 Min. Lot Size Net Area (sq. ft.) 40,000 15,000 10,000 6,000 6,000 Frontage (ft.) 125 100 75 60 50 Min. Yard Setbacks (ft.) Front 50 35 25 25 25 Rear 25 25 25 25 25 Si.de(Interior)a For structure 12' 12.5 10 7.5 7.5b 7.5b or less in height Portion of structure above 12' high 25 20 15 10 7.5 Side (Street) 20 15 15 15 15 Max. Building Height Stories 2 2 2 2 2 Lot overcrwding Ordinance July 29, 2003 Page 2 of 2 Feet 25 25 25 25 25 Max. Building First floor 20 30 30 30 30 Coverage ( %) Second floor: 60 60 60 60 60 % of the first floor Max. Impervious Coverage ( %) 30 40 40 45 45 Note: New additions are shown in underlined bold letters a Cumulative width of both side yards shall be not less than 20 percent of total lot width. b Except that additions to existing structures may have 5 feet interior side setbacks where any portion of the building already has a 5 feet setback. Section 2 All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 3. If any section, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction,' this holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 4. All structures that become nonconforming as a result of the passage of this ordinance will be governed by Section 20 -4.8 Nonconforming uses and structures. Section 5. This ordinance shall be effective immediately after the adoption hereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2003 ATTEST: CITY CLERK I" Reading- 2 n a Reading- READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED: MAYOR COMMISSION VOTE: Mayor Feliu: Vice Mayor Russell Commissioner McCrea: Commissioner Bethel: Commissioner Wiscombe: I ORDINANCE NO: 2 3 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, 4 FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, 5 AMENDING SECTION 2 -3.5E ENTITLED "DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS- SINGLE FAMILY 6 DISTRICT" IN ORDER TO ADDRESS LOT OVERCROWDING AND TO PROVIDE FOR 7 APPROPRIATE SCALED DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS; PROVIDING 8 FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN 9 EFFECTIVE DATE. 10 11 WHEREAS, the City Commission has recently had discussions regarding the trend of large homes 12 being built in the Residential Zoning Districts and wished to address this issue; and 13 14 WHEREAS, these discussions centered upon the impacts of these large homes to the quality of the 15 neighborhoods and the appropriateness of their scale to the surrounding area and 16 17 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION 18 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: 19 20 Section 1 That Section 20- 3.5(E), entitled, "Dimensional Requirements Single Family District," of 21 the South Miami Land Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 22 23 Section 20- 3.5(E) 24 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS 25 SINGLE- FAMILY DISTRICT 26 REQUIREMENT RS -1 RS -2 RS -3 RS -4 RS -5 Min. Lot Size Net Area (sq. ft.) 40,000 15,000 10,000 6,000 6,000 Frontage (ft.) 125 100 75 60 50 Min. Yard Setbacks (ft.) Front 50 35 25 25 25 Rear 25 25 25 25 25 Side (Interior) a For structure 12' 12.5 10 7.5 7.5b 7.5b or less in height Portion of structure above 25 20 15 10 7.5 12' high Side (Street) 20 15 15 15 15 Max. Building Height -- .�---- _`!, -, .e-, ., ^,+K""7 Lot overcrwding Ordinance July 29, 2003 Page 2 of 2 Stories 2 2 2 2 2 Feet 25 25 25 25 25 Max. Building Coverage ( %) First floor 20 30 30 30 30 Second floor: % of the first floor 60 60 60 60 60 Max. Impervious Coverage (o) 30 40 40 45 45 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 Note: New additions are shown in underlined bold letters a Cumulative width of both side yards shall be not less than 20 percent of total lot width. b Except that additions to existing structures may have 5 feet interior side setbacks where any portion of the building already has a 5 feet setback. Section 2 All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 3. If any section, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, this holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 4. All structures that become nonconforming as a result of the passage of this ordinance will be governed by Section 20 -4.8 Nonconforming uses and structures. Section 5. This ordinance shall be effective immediately after the adoption hereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED this" day of 2003 ATTEST: APPROVED: CITY CLERK MAYOR 1St Reading - 2" d Reading- READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY COMMISSION VOTE: Mayor Feliu: Vice Mayor Russell Commissioner McCrea: Commissioner Bethel: Commissioner Wiscombe: 4 Ci N � N !6 � !L = �a = i Q tq a O J G LL d a •� �m m � � O O F. .N C d E a M O O N Of N T 3 O O O O O O O o co (p O m oo CQ m v ., ti... CO M N (fl M N O O O O O O O O O W v O Cl) M (O O O O O O N co co (LO O '.. O O o 00 O O o co M f..F�.- ..,.... N O O N W 3 O 0 wJ a W (7 Q LaLJ O J Q G' ... Q U` W W 0 0 C2 W Z 0 QO Z O 00 O W Q 0 o > m w O m (n m U) O0 0U (7a Q g D ry O Q Q w Q W 2 O 0' O DI 0 0 = O . .' L U Q Q d U g 0 U K 7 O O a 20 -4.8 SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE 20-4.8 Nonconforming uses and structures. (A) General Regulations. (1) No provision of this Code shall be construed to require a change in the plans, construction or designated use of any building on which actual construction was lawfully begun prior to the advent of nonconforming use status and upon which construction has been diligently carried out, actual construction being defined to include placement of construction materials in permanent position and fastened in a permanent manner. (2) Expansion, Alteration or Enlargement. (a) A building nonconforming only as to height, area or bulk requirements may be altered or extended only if such alteration or extension does not increase the degree of nonconformity in any respect. (b) Nonconformities shall not be enlarged, expanded or extended, nor be used as grounds for adding other structures or uses prohibited elsewhere. (c) A nonconforming use of a structure or land shall not be extended or enlarged by addition of other uses of a nature which would generally be prohibited in the district involved. (d) The nonconforming use of a building may be hereafter extended throughout those parts of a building which were lawfully and manifestly arranged or designed' for use at the time of passage of this Code. (e) No nonconforming use may be expanded or increased beyond the platted lot or tract upon which such nonconforming use is located. (3). Repairs and Maintenance. (a) Nothing in this Code shall prevent the strengthening or restoration to a safe or lawful condition of any part of any building declared unsafe or unlawful. (b) If a nonconforming structure, or portion thereof, containing a nonconforming use becomes physically unsafe, or unlawful due to lack of repairs and maintenance, and is declared by any authorized official to be unsafe or unlawful by reason of physical condition, it shall not thereafter be restored, repaired or rebuilt except in conformity with district regulations and this Code. (4) Legalization of Nonconforming Use. (a) No presently illegal use shall be deemed to have been legalized unless such use falls within rra use district ,where the actual use is a conforming use. (b) Uses not legalized by conformity shall remain nonconforming uses where recognized, (c) A nonconforming use in violation of a provision of this Code shall not be validated by the adoption of this Code unless such use complies with the terms of this Code. (5) A use approved as a nonconforming land use shall be considered a conforming use so long as the conditions of approval are met. Supp. No. 2 102 OTHER REGULATIONS 20 -4.8 (6) No building or land, used for a nonconforming use, which remain vacant and unused for a continuous period of six (6) months, whether or not fixtures are removed, shall again be used except in conformity with the regulations of the district in which such building or land is located. For a multi -unit, multi- tenant land or building which constitutes a nonconforming use, vacancy of one (1) or more units shall have no effect on the rights of the property owner under this section, unless seventy -five (75) percent or more of the gross floor area shall remain vacant and unused for more than six (6) months, after which period the vacant portion shall not again be used for a noncon- forming purpose and the remaining portions of the land or structure shall be brought into conforming use within three (3) years. (7) Any business which holds an occupational license, obtained in compliance with this Code and all other applicable city regulations, shall be deemed a permitted noncon. forming use and shall be allowed to operate at the license fee in effect immediately prior to the effective date of this Code and said fee, as may be amended. (B) Nonconforming Dimensions. (1) A structure which was erected in conformance with the applicable dimensional re- quirements in effect at the time of erection but which at a subsequent date fails to conform to applicable dimensional requirements due to a change in the zoning map, in the dimensional requirements table or in the text of this Code, may continue to be used for any use permitted in the district in which it is located, subject to the require- ments of this section. (2) The following requirements shall -apply to such structures: (a) Use of such structures shall be consistent with parking standards applicable on the first date of such use; and (b) In the event of any remodeling or rebuilding, the remodeling or rebuilding shall not increase the extent of nonconformity with any dimensional requirement. (C) Existence of Nonconforming Use. (1) The director of building and zoning shall make an initial determination of the exist - ence of a nonconforming use, based upon investigations and affidavits he determines to be necessary. (2) Where there is uncertainty in determining the existence of a nonconforming use, such uncertainty as to the existence of a nonconforming use shall be a question of fact to be considered by the planning board, after public notice and hearing in accordance with this Code and board rules. (3) The intermittent,: temporary or illegal use of land or buildings shall not be sufficient to establish the existence of a nonconforming use. (4) The existence of a nonconforming use on part of a lot or tract shall not be construed to establish a nonconforming use on the entire lot or tract. 103 20 -4.8 SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (D) Nonconforming Lots of Record. (1) In any district in which single - family dwellings are permitted, a single - family dwelling and customary accessory buildings may be erected on any single lot of record at the effective date of adoption or amendment of this Code, notwithstanding limitations imposed by other provisions of this Code. (a) Such lots must be in separate ownership and not of continuous frontage with other lots in the same ownership. (b) This provisions shall apply even though such lot fails to meet the requirements for area or width, or both, that are generally applicable in the district, provided' that yard dimensions and requirements other than for area or width, or both, of the, lot conform to regulations for the district in which the lot is located. (2) In order to minimize the number of nonconforming lots, if two or more adjoining vacant and platted lots and/or parcels with continuous frontage on a public street in continuous ownership since the time of passage of this Code, and if either or any of such lots or parcels individually is /are too small in any dimension to meet the yard, width and lot area requirements of the district in which they are located, then such group of lots and/or parcels shall be considered as a single lot or several lots of such size as is necessary to met the mhi imum dimensional requirements of the district. (a) No portion of said parcel shall be used or sold in a manner which diminishes compliance with lot width and area requirements established by this Code. (b) No division of any parcel shall be made which creates a'lot with width or area below the requirements of this Code. (3) If any person shall have at any time aft er'passage of this Code created a lot or parcel which fails to conform with the dimensional requirements of the district in which it is located by selling part of a lot, such sale shall have no effect for purposes of this Code and the lots and/or parcels shall still be considered as part of one (1) or more lots. (E) Nonconforming Use of Land. (1) Where at the time of passage of this Code, lawful use of land exists which would not be permitted by regulations' imposed by this Code, the use may be continued so long as it remains otherwise lawful, subject to conditions provided herein. (2) Such nonconforming use of land shall be subject to the following conditions: (a) No such nonconforming use shall be enlarged or increased, nor extended to oc- cupy a greater area of land than was occupied at the effective date of adoption or amendment of this Code; (b) No such nonconforming use shall be moved in whole or in part to any portion of the lot or parcel other than that occupied by such use as of the effective date of this Code; (c) No additional structure not conforming to the requirements of this Code shall be erected in connection with such nonconforming use of land. 104 — 4 OTHER REGULATIONS 20-4.8 OMM+ (F) Nonconforming Use of Structures. I Wh 1 wful th ff d thi ( ere a a structure effista at e e ectrve date of a option or amendment o f s Code that could not be built under the terms of this Code by reason of restrictions on areas, lot coverage, height, yards, its location on the lot, or other requirements concerning the structure, such structure may be continued so long as it remains otherwise lawful, subject to the conditions contained herein. (2) Such nonconforming use of structures shall be subject to the following conditions: (a) No nonconforming use may be enlarged or altered in any way which increase its nonconformity but any structure or portion' thereof may be altered to decrease its nonconformity; (b) In the event that a nonconforming structure is moved for any reason for any distance whatever, such structure shall conform to the regulations for the district in which it is located after it is moved; and, (c) Any structure in which a nonconforming use is superseded by a conforming use, shall thereafter conform to district regulations, and the nonconforming use may not be resumed. (G) Damage of a Nonconforming Structure or Use. (1) If a nonconforming structure or use is damaged by more than fifty (50) percent of its replacement value, all of its rights as a nonconforming structure or use shall be terminated. (2) If a nonconforming structure or use is damaged by less than fifty (50) percent of its replacement value, such structure or use may be repaired or reconstructed and used as before the time of damage. Such repair or reconstruction shall be started within sixty (60) calendar days of such damage and shall be completed within twelve (12) months. (H) Continuation of Nonconforming Use. (1) Except as otherwise provided herein, the lawful use of a building existing at the effective date of this Code may be continued, although such use does not conform with this Code. (2) Continuation of a nonconforming use shall be subject to such regulations as the city commission may require for immediate preservation of adjacent property prior to the ultimate removal of the nonconforming use. (I) Change in Nonconforming Use. (1) If no structural alterations are made, a nonconforming use may be changed to another nonconforming use, provided that the new use is within a higher or more restrict- ae classification than the original use. (2) In the event that a nonconforming use of a building is changed to a conforming use or another nonconforming use of more restricted classification, the use shall not be changed later to a less restrictive classification. Supp. No. 2 105 20 -4.8 SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (3) In the event that a nonconforming use is changed to another nonconforming use of more restricted classification, the prior less restrictive classification shall be consid- ered abandoned. (Ord. No. 9 -90 -1449, 6- 12 -90; Ord. No. 4 -93- 1533, 6 -1 -93; Ord. No. 19 -96 -1619, §§ 3, 4, 10 -1 -96) 20-4.9 Historic preservation standards. (A) Historic and Archeological Sites. (1) The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Historic Preservation Projects: with Guidelines for Applying the Standards, 1979, or as may be updated, and the Metropolitan Dade County historic preservation guidelines shall be used by the board for reviewing projects proposed for designated historic properties and sites or for properties within historic districts. (2) In addition to the above referenced federal and county guidelines, the following shall also be utilized as general standards by the board for determining structures and sites having historic or archeological significance: (a) Districts, sites, structures and objects of national, state and local importance are of historic significance if they possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association, and: (b) Are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or (c) Are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or (d) Embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, style or method of construction or work of a master; or that possess high artistic value, or that represent a distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual dis- tinction; or (e) Have yielded, or are likely to yield information in history or prehistory; or (f) Are listed in the National Historic Register. (B) Demolition of Historic Structures. In addition to all other provisions of this Code, the board shall consider the following standards in evaluating applications for demolition of designated historic' structures. (1) Is the structure of such interest or quality that it would reasonably meet national, state or local criteria for designation as an historic or architectural landmark? (2) Is the structure of such design,; craftsmanship or material that it could be reproduced only with great difficulty and/or expense? (3) Is the structure one of the last remaining examples of its kind in the area, city, county or region? (4) Does the structure contribute significantly to the historic character of a designated district? Supp. No. 2 -106 Ni vp EN y 0i /£ _ CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING BOARD Regular Meeting Action Summary Minutes Tuesday, July 8, 2003 City Commission Chambers 7 :30 P.M. IV. Discussion Item Subject: Lot Overcrowding / Single- Family Development Regulations Action: Mr. Basu presented the item for discussion, following up with the previous discussion on "Mansionization," at the Planning Board on March 25th, 2003. Charts suggesting modifications to the Dimensional Requirements of Single Family Districts were also presented. The Board and staff discussed the proposal and suggested the following modifications: 1) No setback change for RS -5; 2) 20% cumulative setback be increased for RS -1 and RS -2. Speaker: Jay Beckman 6520 SW 65th St Mr. Beckman urged the Board that in pursuing the goal of regulating the distance between homes, not to jeopardize the construction of good homes in the future. Motion: Mr. Comendeiro moved to recommend the Discussion Item to be heard by the City Commission for first reading. Ms. Yates seconded the motion Vote: Ayes 6 Nays 0 V. Approval of Minutes Action: The Board duly voted on and approved the minutes of May 27, 2003. Vote:, Ayes 6 Nays 0 K: \PB \PB Minutes\2003 Minutes \MINS 7 -08 -03 (exerpt).doc .... CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING BOARD Regular Meeting Action Summary Minutes Tuesday, March 25, 2003 City Commission Chambers 7:30 P.M. (G) Discussion Item Subject: Mansionization and/or "Monster Homes;" Single- Family Residential Zoning Issues at the request of Commissioner Randy Wiscombe. Speakers: Mark Radosevich 5703 SW 83rd St Yvonne Beckman 5871 SW 83' St Jay Beckman 6520 SW 65' St Carlos de Leon So Miami resident Jim Dundorf 6151 SW 80th St Beth Schwartz 6931 SW 62nd Ct Phil Roberts 5951 SW 84' St Action: Mr. Lorber presented the item: The construction of larger homes being built in the City recently has been a cause for concern and complaints from some residents in South Miami. Particularly troubling for some residents is the emergence of two- story homes. On the other hand, there are residents with the opposite opinion, who feel that the larger homes are good for the neighborhood, help revitalize the area and increase property value. The main concern expressed by most of the residents appearing before the Board- is the need for setback change in relation to two -story homes in order to avoid the loss of privacy by the adjacent one -story homes. Mr. Beckman tried to demonstrate this fact by presenting slide pictures showing some two -story homes next to the smaller homes. It was the consensus of many of the residents that an adjustment in'the setbacks and the FAR for the second story is absolutely necessary in order to protect the privacy of the neighbors surrounding these homes. After closing the public hearing, the Board, and staff discussed the issues relating to the changes being proposed. In its discussion, the Board suggested to take into consideration the right of the property owners to maximize the potential of their lots. One solution the Board recommended to be explored would be to "play" with the ground coverage and work it into some type of FAR for the second floor, and then also revisit the setback issue so that the ground coverage will still allow to build the second story but in a different massing. The Board also talked about encouraging the construction of unique architectural style homes, expressing concern for the repetition of the Mediterranean style seen in new construction. Motion: Mr. Morton moved to defer the item for further discussion recommending the following: Based on the hearing held tonight, there is a need to study setbacks and FAR for the two -story homes for the RS -1, RS- 2 and RS -3 areas, by conducting a workshop which will include Planning Board members, staff, and homeowners. Mr. Mann seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes '5 Nays 0 K: \PB \PB Minutes \MINS 3 -25 -03 (exerpt).doc NFU lUt hUK.. HrF�t 4Ut'I iI� I � SI.HL 1J , ��ELaPMENT UVITHINTHRESIENTIAL_ [ISTRiCTS. .: PRVIDIN .,, . _._ FGRt E�ERABILITY-' PROU`11JING , , ,FOR g. fRDk- NANC,S IN . 'CONFLICT; ` ANDS PRQUIDING AN EFFLCTIVE 17ATE. id o`reirnance Can be inspected in the, City CCerk's Offiice,;,„ Monday - Friday dunng ragula office h: ours AM z irlquirie5 concerning this item :. should be dr ected to !the PIannirig Department at 305- 63= 63.26°. ALL interested parties < °are`inuited ib attend and wall' be' heard. , �� _Ut GV IN Ronetta Taylor; CMC..: Clty Clerk yof Clt y South, Miami , Rursuant'to'_ Florida Statutes 286.0105; the City, hereby advises the public #hat if a person decides fo appeal eny deci ibri made'by this Board Agency or Commission with respecf to`any matter considered at {t� its meeting "or hearing, he or she will need. a record of the procdedirigs, �,zw and that for? such purpose, affected person ,may need'to ensure that a verbatim record Qf,tMe:proceedings._iS made which record` includes the testimony and#eVidence upon; which the appeal is to; be based. I CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI To: Honorable Mayor, Vice Mayor & Date: July 29, 2003 City Commission Agenda Item. No. From: Maria V. Davis his RE: Waiver of Plat/Pedro Infante City Manager .6, 5243 SW 63rd Court RESOLUTION (PB 03 -012) Applicant; Pedro Infante Location: 5243 SW 63rd Court Request: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR & CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO A REQUEST FOR A WAIVER OF PLAT PURSUANT TO SECTION 20- 4.2(B) OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND SECTION 28 -4 OF THE COUNTY CODE, REGARDING THE PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE RS -2, "SEMI- ESTATE RESIDENTIAL," LOCATED AT 5243 SW 63RD COURT, SOUTH MIAMI FLORIDA 33155; PROVIDING FOR BONDING PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 -9 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR A LEGAL DESCRIPTION; AND, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: An' application for Waiver of Plat was applied for by Pedro Infante and wife, Gina Infante, in order to divide a tract of land described as property folio 09 -4024- 026 -0080, located at 5243 SW 63rd Court and legally described as shown in the Attachment "A ". At the July 8, 2003, Planning Board conducted a public hearing on this request. WAIVER OF PLAT PROCEDURE The Land Development Code Section, 20 -4.2 specifies that the Planning Board shall review the applications for a waiver of plat before they are presented to the City Commission for final resolution. In addition to having to meet minimum zoning standards, Waiver -of Plat applications are to be reviewed on the basis of neighborhood compatibility. Specifically, three criteria are applied: (a) The building site created by the proposed waiver -of -plat will be equal to or larger than the majority of the existing building sites and of the same character as the surrounding area (this shall be demonstrated using copies of the official plat maps for the subject property and surrounding neighborhood). (b) The building site created by the proposed waiver -of -plat will not result in existing structures becoming nonconforming as they relate to setbacks and other applicable regulations of these land development regulations. .'" �. �- �„,- 4.:�- �- =e- •-a,:— �': -a�'"x +,. �;"` = ��,,'"T`..F d- u'°'a�s;7:.a�..�3`"rv. °�..a^�-��; ,�z*s--- �-'r��'^"Y,,,,� ,�„_�, �„�,.,„'F'��`�r•�.�.n -��N t�^. „z^^� -?-� , ,�::� -tsr� <.t =. Waiver 5243 SW 63rd Court July 29, 2003 Page 2 of 3 (c) The building site created by the proposed waiver -of plat will be free of encroachments from abutting buildable sites. Additional conditions may be added by the City Commission in connection with a waiver -of -plat approval to assure that such waiver will conform to the foregoing requirements. This provision could be used, for example, to ensure the retention or protection of trees on the subject property. Pursuant to Section 20 -3.5E of the Land Development Code, Dimensional Requirements Single - Family District are as follows: ZONING SUMMARY for Parent Tract: (a) Zoning Designation: RS -2 "Semi- Estate Residential (b) Use: Single - Family (c) Lot size: 37,524 s.f. Minimum lot size 15,000 s.f. required. (d) Building Frontage:. 317.96 feet, Minimum frontage 100 feet required. ZONING SUMMARY for Lot "A ": (a) Zoning Designation: RS -2 "Semi- Estate Residential" (b) Use: Single- Family (c) Lot Size': 21,474 s.f. proposed, Minimum lot size 15,000 s.f. required. (d) Building frontage: 182 feet proposed, Minimum frontage 100 feet required. ZONING SUMMARY for Lot "B ": (a) Zoning Designation: RS -2 "Semi- Estate Residential ". (b) Use: Single - Family. (c) Lot Size: 16,050 s.f. proposed, Minimum lot size 15,000 s.f. required (d) Building frontage: 135 feet proposed, Minimum frontage 100 feet required. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Land Development Code • Section 20 -3.5 Dimensional Requirements • Section 20 -4.2 Land Subdivision Regulations • Section 20 -4.1 Adequate public facilities and Services Comprehensive Plan • Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Future Land Use Element Dade County Code • Chapter 28 -4 Subdivision Regulations STAFF OBSERVATIONS / ANALYSIS Currently Lot "A" has an existing one -story single - family residential structure on the subject property, which is to be retained. The survey indicates that the existing single- family structure will meet the setback requirements of the land development code after the property is „ ,...-- ..�- -t � -, �. �,.--- � -��.., Fes';- ,�- "'- •- �— .' ---- .•.., .... rr.. ..;�" '€..^-a rid'=. ,. , fi'i,°r'��-^F.?^"� _ ;"n£T z.�... _ i'�`�'a:T^` Waiver 5243 SW 63rd, Court July 29, 2003 Page 3 of 3 subdivided, provided that the existing storage and the pool are removed. There is no information on existing trees, however the site is generally clear of any significant trees. The proposed waiver of plat would create two single residential properties, zoned RS -2 "Semi - Estate Residential," located at 5243 SW 63rd Court. The applicant intends to remain in residence in the existing house on proposed parcel "A ", while constructing a new single family home for his daughter on proposed parcel "B ". The two parcels at this location are consistent with the RS- 2 zoning on the west and south of the subject property. Properties on the north and east, are outside the City Limits, located in unincorporated Miami -.Dade County and are zoned as Estate EU 1. The proposed wavier of plat is creating tracts that are larger than the minimum required by the land development regulations for RS -2. Based on the analysis of all the properties within a radius of 500 feet to evaluate if the proposed property meet or exceed the guidelines for such an approval, the staff concludes as follows: a) While the newly created properties meet and exceed the minimum required dimensions of RS 2 zoning classification, approximately 75% of the properties within the 500 feet radius (area for notification) are larger than both of the proposed properties. b) Once the existing storage is removed the building site Lot A, created by the proposed waiver - of- -plat will not result in existing structure becoming nonconforming as they relate to setbacks and other applicable regulations of these land development regulations. c) Once the pool structure is removed the building site Lot B, created by the proposed waiver -of plat will be free of encroachments from abutting buildable site. d) Existing property has no significant trees that may require relocation or removal. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION Based upon the observations stated above the staff recommended denial of the request. PLANNING BOARD ACTION At its meeting of July 8, 2003, the Planning Board voted 4 -2 to deny the request. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the request for a waiver of plat be denied. Attachments: Draft Resolution with Attachment A Application Property Survey Letter of Intent Locator Map Letter outlining conditions to mitigate neighborhood concerns Public Notices Planning Board Minutes Excerpt 7/8/03 MVD /SB /SAY sb KAComm Items\2003 \07 -29 -03 \Waiver of Plat 5243 SW 63rd Ct Report:doe 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR & CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO A REQUEST FOR A WAIVER OF PLAT PURSUANT TO SECTION 20- 4.2(B) OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND SECTION 28 -4 OF THE COUNTY CODE, REGARDING THE PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE RS -2, "SEMI- ESTATE RESIDENTIAL, LOCATED AT 5243 SW 6381 COURT, SOUTH MIAMI FLORIDA 33155; PROVIDING FOR BONDING PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 -9 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR A LEGAL DESCRIPTION; AND, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Mr. Pedro Infante; owner of the property located at 5243 SW 63rd Court, submitted an application requesting a waiver of plat, pursuant to Section 20- 4.2(b) of the Land Subdivision Regulations; and, WHEREAS, Planning staff has recommended denial of the application based upon incompatibility with the surrounding area; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Board conducted a public hearing on the request at its meeting on July 8, 2003 and recommended denial by a vote of 4 -2 of the request pursuant to Section 20- 4.2(b) of the Land Subdivision Regulations; and, WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami with advise and recommendation from the Planning Board deny the tentative plat pursuant to Section 20- 4.2(b) of the Land Subdivision Regulations; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1: Properties created by this application will be equal or smaller than fewer than 25% of all the properties, within the 500 feet radius (area for notification) of the newly created property and will be out of character with the rest of the surrounding neighborhood. Section 2:The application submitted by Mr. Pedro Infante, requesting approval of a proposed separation of the lot legally described in Section 3, pursuant to Section 20- 4.2(b) of the Land Subdivision Regulations and, is hereby denied. Section 3: See attachment A Section 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon approval. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2003. ATTEST: APPROVED: CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: MAYOR. CITY ATTORNEY sb K: \Comm Items \2003 \07 -29 -03 \Waiver of Plat 5243 SW 63rd Ct Resol.doe Commission Vote: Mayor Feliu: Vice Mayor Russell: Commissioner McCrea: Commissioner Bethel: Commissioner Wiscombe: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ATTACHMENT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parent Tract: ALL OF BLOCK 2, LA HAMACA; ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED PLAT BOOK 51 AT PAGE 25 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 37,524 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS OR 0.79 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL "A ": BLOCK 2, LA HAMACA, LESS THE NORTH 135' THERE OF, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 51 AT PAGE 25 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 21,474 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS, OR 0.49 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL "B "c THE NORTH 135' OF BLOCK 2, LA HAMACA, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 51 AT PAGE 25 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 16,050 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS, OR 0.37 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. �o► City of South Miami Planning & Zoning Department 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida 33143 Telephone: (305)663 -6327 Telefacsimile: (305)666 -4591 Application For Waiver of Plate Address of Subject Property: g5245 -:560 �_� G' f'• J�'llA%'i / -%L 33/�J'7i pg(s} Block Subdivision - - -- - -- 51_- G-E 2S- Meets & Bounds: - - - - - -- - - - - -- -- -=-- - - -- Applicant: Phone: - - - -- CfxJ1 ®5- leG'335 G9�9d Representative: , -Organization: i Add----------------- - - - - -- ___ ress: ------- - - -1-- Phone;------------------------ - - - - -- i Property Owner. ��� 11� )� X i Signat e: ---- - - - - -- r Mailing Address: - -- ------------------ t�- - -. — r � Phone: V01 �--- - - - - -- �j�Z¢3 S�v 31ld / ->0 -33! 3ms R Surveyor: ,Phone: V0-17 SbgVeo,J25, /NU 30�• 253- o�oGf. AS THE APPLICANT, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO THIS' PROJECT: Owner _Owner's Representative _Contract to purchase ,Option to purchase Tenant/Lessee Please answer the following: SUBMITTED MATERIALS PLEASE CHECK ALL THAT APPLY Zoning District: !""'Application Form Septic Tank or Sewer: S'�Z ,K• Warranty Deed(s) Public or Well Water Supply: (v &--I, ( r,'� Letter from Owner(s) Lot Frontage(s): 3 Z' `l6 �epriT' 13 5, /o ,VL—w Power of attorney Net Lot Area(s): 37.7¢5. So /&.,o ;0 .5-pr, ,! /9W _ Contract to purchase Setbacks for Existing Building(s): /p � V Waiver of Plat (22 copies) Existing Building Coverage(s): -f 059 - 37 7�5. Jam_ p,lp Signed' & Sealed by a Registered Surveyor Existing Impervious Coverage(s): 37, 7fS*J7- 4,psee 3755 _ 29 1! F.A.R. (For Cornmer ,ial Only): 9 C Required Fee(s) 0 Abutting Streets) Right -of- way's: V0 M0 , T nde si n has ad thi ompleted application and represents that the information and all submitted materials are true and corre t t yes oft appli is knowledge and belief p uant'. S gn a and tine Date Upon receipt. applications and all submitted materials will be reviewed for compliance with the Land Development Code and other applicable regulations. Applications found not in compliance will be rejected and returned to the applicant. OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Filed City Approval Concurrency Method of Payment County Approval 3 Found. 1/2" Iron Pipe No. ID Found. 1/2" Iron Pipe 0.30' NORTH No. ID xv ° 25.00' Record & Meaosured 118.80' N.f © 0.25' +11. X - X- X -X -X -X X 25.00' �P Concrete Louver Fence ti��e9 0s0' J Chain Link Fence 18.00' Chain Link jFeceL Chain Lin Fence (Typical) PARCEL "B" The Land Area t 16,056,sq. ft. o 1'0.37 acres. (ror H.R.S. Purposes Concreo 161.80' x 135' = 21,843.00) C (Counted unt8 streetpovement Edge). Louver FL I EXISTING POOL d 1 �ti� 70 BE REMOVED Lo M uj x� � o bo rn M fx4 X. Set 1/2" Reba ' Set 1/2" Rebar 'I ca No. 2821 cap No. 2821 2.63' p RD= 118.80' X_ wEll�® o. ,..� EXISTING STORAGE P.Pofe TO BE REMOVE arage x�`°� I �A 20.40 ELECT SERV. 34.61' 8.8Q Existing Covered 2.90' Terraq 10.55'. e 760' o Open Deck 24.23° .~ a Court b 19.30' � co 4� J ao o m Yard y Entry 16.25 °o 9 -E SEPTIC 4236' Building a o 17.30, o c 4.00' 4.60' 1 .12' a°i o E Planter 'oo I = o $ . 26.40'. O o n . PARCEL "Ao$ DRAIN Do - The Land area = FIELD f 21,474 sC• ft. n N t 0.49 acres Do i a = !� z R =25.00 R =25.00 �,� vJ a L =39.33 L =39:21 Tan =25.06 Tan =24.94 o 677 90'08'42" �89'S1'18" ' f . CH=35.40 CH =35.31 25.00' i Record & 'Nieaasu�ed 68.79' (. P.Pole °; Found Rebar 5/8" Found Rebar 5/8" co No. 2821 cap No 2821 x� al and Disc ] _ Found 1 1 2'. �., FNAILa .V V 53rc .—Street centerline FOUND MHN.I LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARENT TRACT : All of Black 2, LA HAMACA, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded Plat Book 51 at Page 25 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL "A': Block 2, LA HAMACA, Less the north 135' There of, according to the Plat as recorded in Plat Book 51 at Page 25 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL "B ": The north 135' of Block 2, LA HAMACA, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 51 at Page 25 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. SURVEY FOR: PEDRO INFANTE 5243 SW 63RD COURT MIAMI, FLORIDA I HEREBY CERTIFY: That the WAIVER OF PLAT of the above captioned property was completed under my supervision and /or direction, to the best of my knowledge and belief. This survey meets or exceeds the Minimum Technical Standards set forth by the Florida Board of Land Surveyors in Chapter 61G -17 -6 Florida Administrative Cade. Pursuant to Section 472.027, Florida Statutes. SU Y S, DELTA SURVEYORS, INC, 13205 SW 137TH AVENUE' SUITE 225 ff' WALDO F. PAEZ MIAMI, FLORIDA 33186 PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER r` NO. 3284 305- 253 -0909 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION FAX: 305- 253 -0933 L.B. NO. 3386 STATE OF FLORIDA 1) FLOOD ZONE: AE BASE: 9:0' PANEL: 0190 J COMMUNITY NO. .120635 DATE OF MAP: 3 -2 -94 2) THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY THAT MAY BE FOUND IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THIS COUNTY 3) EXAMINATION OF ABSTRACT OF TITLE WILL HAVE TO BE MADE TO DETERMINE RECORDED INSTRUMENTS, IF ANY, AFFECTING PROPERTY 4) LOCATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF UTILIT1LIES, IF ANY ARE SHOWN IN ACCORDANCE WITH RECORDED PLAT 5) OWNERSHIP IS SUBJECT TO OPINION OF TITLE 6) TYPE OF SURVEY; WAIVER OF PLAT 7) LEGAL' DESCRIPTION: FURNISHED BY CLIENT 8) THIS SURVEY IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER 9) THIS PLAN OF SURVEY, HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE ENTITIES NAMED HEREON, THE CERTIFICATE DOES NOT EXTEND TO ANY UNNAMED PARTIES 10) UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE NOT DEPICTED HEREON, CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY PRIOR TO ANY DESIGN WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ON THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED. SURVEYOR SHALL BE NOTIFIED AS TO ANY DEMATION FROM UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON. 11) THE SURVEYOR OF RECORD DOES NOT DETERMINE OWNERSHIP OF FENCES. MEASUREMENTS SHOWN HEREON DEPICT PHYSICAL LOCATION OF FENCE 12) WELL- IDENTIFIED&TURES IN THIS SURVEY AND MAP HAVE BEEN MEASURED TO AN ESTIMATED HOR1Z( NTAL P03 ONAL ACCURACY OF 1:7500 FT. 13) IN SOME INSTANCES, GRAPHIC REPRESENTATIONS HAVE BEEN EXAGGERATED TO MORE CLEARLY ILLUSTRATE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS AND /OR LOT LINES, IN ALL CASES, DIMENSIONS SHOWN SHALL CONTROL THE LOCATION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS OVER SCALED POSITIONS. 14) DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: TO USE AS A SEMI- ESTATE RESIDENCE 15) PROPERTY ZONE: RS -2 DADE COUNTY FLOOD CRITERIA OF ELEVATION 7.0 FEET MORE OR LESS. THIS ELEVATION WAS PRORATED FROM PLAT BOOK 120 AT PAGE 13, SHEET N0. 2 (DATED 06- 06 794) AND SHOULD BE VERIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT OF MIAMI -DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEARINGS HEREON ARE REFERRED TO AN ASSUMED VALUE OF N G0 00'00 "S FOR THE CENTERLINE OF SW 63RD COURT, SAID BEARING IS IDENTICAL WITH THE PLAT OF RECORD 0.0 DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION ELEVATION' REFERS TO THE NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF MEAN SEA LEVEL OF 1929 BENCHMARK: CG -9 ELEVATION: 12.27' LOCATOR INDEX: 4004 FIELD. SURVEY DATE: 3 -14 -03 SCALE 1" = 20' DRAWN BY: L.R; DRAWING DATE: 3 -17-03 FB: SKETCH DRAWING NO.: 03 -345Z I r i May 8, 2003 City of South Miami Planning & Zoning Department 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, FL 33143 Re: 5243 SW 63 Court, Miami, Florida To Whom It May Concern: I hereby request the subdivision of the above- referenced property into two single - family residence lots. One of the lots will be for my residence and, the other will be for future development of my daughter's home. Please be advised that there will be no removal of trees within the lots. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me at (305) 668 -3350. Infante N CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI W , E 5243 SW 63rd Court s 0 100 200 300 600 900 1,200 Feet -v BILZIN SUMBERG BAENA PRICE & AXELROD LLP A PARTNERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS 200 SOUTH BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, SUITE 2500 • MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131-5340 TELEPHONE: (305) 374-7580 • FAX: (305) 374 -7593 E -MAIL: INFO ®BILZIN..COM • WWW.BILZIN.COM JERRY B. PROCTOR, ESQ. Direct Dial (305) 350 -2361 Email: JProctor @Bilzin.com June 25, 2003 Via Fax & US Mail Mr. Subrata Basu Planning Director City of South Miami 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, Florida 33143 Re: Applicant: Pedro Infante Property: 5243 SW 63 Court, South Miami Planning Board Hearing Date: July 8, 2003 Dear Mr. Basu: As you requested, enclosed please find the official zoning map for Miami -Dade County for Section 24, Township 54, Range 40 which includes the portion of the City of South Miami containing the property owned by our client Pedro Infante. In addition, please review the attached list of conditions that Mr. Infante has stipulated as limitations on future development ofproposed Parcel lB" withinhis property. We believe that these conditions will offer significant limitations in the public record and assuage many of the compatibility concerns raised by neighboring property owners. Please give me a call if you have any questions. Thank you for your cooperation. Yours ve truly, Jerry B. Proctor JBP: id cc: Pedro Infante \75694 \19254\ # 631277 v 1 6/25/03 3:14 PM ,. .,T _71 INFANTE CONDITIONS 1. That the banyan tree in the south central property area of proposed Parcel "B" not be removed by the Owner. 2. That the only vehicular entrance and exit to Parcel "B" be off SW 63 Court unless said entrance is disapproved by governmental permitting authorities. 3. That the western 25' of the existing berm along the west property line of proposed Parcel "B" be maintained, except for modifications necessary to place ingress /egress driveway(s). 4. That a berm be placed along the north and east property lines of proposed Parcel "B ", said berm to be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion for any structure(s) on Parcel "B ". 5. That if a two -story home is built on proposed Parcel "B ", the second story will contain no more than sixty (60) percent of the floor area on the first floor. 6. That these conditions shall run with the land and shall remain in full force and effect and be binding upon the Owner, and their heirs, successors and assigns until such time as same is modified or released by the City Commission of South Miami, Florida. 7. That the Development Order approved in conjunction with these conditions be recorded in the Public Records of Miami -Dade County at the cost of the Owner, after the expiration of all appeal periods. June 25, 2003 - \75694 \19254\ # 630421 v 1 6/25/03 3:14 PM ........ K 11 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING BOARD Regular Meeting Action Summary Minutes Tuesday, July 8, 2003 City Commission Chambers 7:30 P.M. PB 03 -012 Applicant: Pedro infante Location: 5243 SW 63'd Court Request: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR & CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO A REQUEST FOR A WAIVER OF PLAT PURSUANT TO SECTION 20- 4.2(B) OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND SECTION 28 -4 OF THE COUNTY CODE, REGARDING THE PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE RS -2, "SEMI- ESTATE RESIDENTIAL," LOCATED AT 5243 SW 63RD COURT, SOUTH MIAMI FLORIDA 33155; PROVIDING FOR BONDING PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 -9 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR A LEGAL DESCRIPTION; AND, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Applicant present: Jerry Proctor, attorney for Mr. Infante Action: Mr. Morton read the item into the record and Mr. Basu presented the staff report. Mr. Basu explained the criteria to be applied in reviewing any application for waiver of plat, as per Ordinance No. 9 -02 -1777 adopted 9 -17 -2002: The Land Development Code specifies that the Planning Board first reviews applications before they go to the City Commission. In addition to having to meet minimum zoning standards, Waiver -of Plat applications are to be reviewed by the Planning Board and City Commission on the basis of neighborhood compatibility. Specifically, three criteria are applied: (a) Whether the building sites created would be equal to or larger than the majority of the existing building sites and of the same character as the surrounding area (this shall be demonstrated using copies of the official plat maps for the subject property and surrounding neighborhood). (b) Whether the building site created would result in existing structures becoming nonconforming as they relate to setbacks and other applicable regulations of these land development regulations. (c) Whether the building site created would be free of encroachments from abutting buildable sites. Staff conducted an analysis of all the properties within a radius of 500 feet of the subject property. Staff recommended denial based on the conclusion that, while the newly created properties meet and exceed the minimum required dimensions of RS 2 zoning classification, approximately 75% of the properties within the 500' feet radius (area for notification) are larger than both of the proposed properties. Mr. Proctor also mentioned a list of conditions the applicant is proposing with the intent to offer significant limitations on future development of the proposed Parcel `B" within his property. The most significant of these conditions appear to be the one where the applicant is proposing to place a berm along the north and Planning Board Meeting July 8, 2003 Page 2 of 2 east property lines of the proposed Parcel `B." A good portion of the discussion revolved around the proposed berm, which the majority of the speakers argued that a berm for the purpose of retaining rain water within the property would not be effective. Generally, Mr. Proctor's presentation was basically similar to the preceding request for waiver of plat, reiterating that the application meets code, and again questioning the validity of the requirements set forth by the ordinance referred herein, which he considers to be in conflict with the City's master plan and with the zoning regulations. Again, Ms. Boutsis informed the Board that a, legal opinion will be provided to assist in clarifying this issue, in time for consideration by the City Commission of the waiver of plats referred herein. Speakers: Name Address In favor Against Jay Beckman 6520 SW 65th St X Mark Ball 5275 SW 63rd Ave X Agustin Mendez 5301 SW 62"d Ave X Cesar -Sordo 5262 SW 62nd Ave X Charles Ebert 5201 SW 63rd Ave X Barbara Reynaud 5105 SW 63rd Ct X Eloy Bailey .5151 SW 63rd Ave X Jay Praschnik 6291 Miller Rd X Alina Cepero 5330 SW 62nd Ave X Roger Henry 5200 SW 63' Ct X Kitty Morgan 6380 SW 50' St X Maureen Henry 5200 SW 63rd Ct X Bob Rothman 5210 SW 60th PI X Jack Levine 6161 Miller Rd X The concern expressed by the speakers who were opposed to the proposal for waiver of plat included but were not limited to: increase in traffic; increase in flooding situations; pollution of wells; loss of character of the neighborhood. Some speakers referred to the Northside Charrette, which called for maintaining the integrity of the neighborhood. In his rebuttal, Mr. Proctor noted that the lot sizes of Miami -Dade County properties, should not be considered when reviewing these applications for waiver of plat. The City Attorney informed that the City has an interlocal agreement with Miami -Dade County allowing the City to consider County properties falling within the 500 feet radius of the subject property. Mr. Proctor added that denying this application would establish a category for this property of one home for 37,000 sq. ft which is not the zoning on that property. Once again, before making a motion on this particular application for waiver of plat, the Board requested further clarification by staff as to the criteria set forth when reviewing any application of this nature, as per Ordinance No. 9 -02 -1777 adopted 9 -17 -2002: (a) "Whether the proposed building sites if created would be equal to or larger than the majority of the existing building sites...." Staff responded: "not within the 500 feet of the subject property." (b) Whether the proposed building site if created would result in existing structures becoming nonconforming...." Staff responded: "no." (d) Whether the proposed building site if created would be free of encroachments..." Staff responded: "once they remove the existing structures they will be." Motion: Mr. Comendeiro moved for denial of the application, per the findings of fact being consistent with staff s recommendation. Mr. Illas seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes 4 Nays 2 (Ms. Gibson, Mr. Liddy) K: \PB\PB Minutes\2003 Minutes\MINS 7 -08 -03 (exerpt 2).doc ��'. �"'`:-.? %.'�'�5.'K .... 3 �. ��k^. +,^3F's',Y,&N'h�ra E.:o.i�"Si r.�..a. a MILLER ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ., Date: July 29, 2003 To: The City of South Miami City Commission Re; PB -03 -012, Pedro Infante, 5243 SW 63 Court I, (name) n - currently residing at (address) � 17 J G / �1 p� f✓ / i /!2/ / `� , am opposed to Mr. Pedro In.fante's request for Waiver of Plat. I am opposed to diminishing "`green space" and am opposed to lot-splitting i�'± the Cij of South Mia3rd- Respectfully submitted, (si77W7 and da ) (ieiepnone) rn y� �m O 70 n D2�~ o bd m rKm 7> O DZD ca wc�+ �m03 w CD d C °- mZ b t,a n � � 4N 4.. 0. � b ti ..uw. rn y� �m O 70 n D2�~ o bd m rKm 7> O DZD ca wc�+ �m03 w CD d C °- mZ b t,a n � � July 24, 2003 TO: Hon. Horace G. Feliu, Mayor Hon. Mary Scott Russell, Vice Mayor Hon Randy G. Wiscombe Hon. David D. Bethel Hon. Dan McCrea FROM: Charles F. Ebert III 5201 SW 63 Avenue Miami, FL 33155 -6249 RE Waiver of Plat 5243 SW 63 Ct South Miami, FL 33155 Pedro Infante, Applicant It is my understanding_ that this matter is scheduled for your consideration at the upcoming South Miami Commission meeting of July 29, 2003 Although I plan to attend this meeting, I don't.know if circumstances, or the Commission's agenda, will allow me the opportunity to speak to this matter. Accordingly, ,I am writing to you today. For the record, ,I am OPPOSED to the granting of the Waiver of Plat which the applicant seeks. Moreover, I do not believe the applicant meets the criteria which are a condition precedent to the granting of a Waiver of Plat. For sake of argument, I would like to address three issues. Said issues are as follows: I. VALIDITY OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In his presentation before the Planning Board, applicant's legal counsel appeared to question the validity of the criteria used to determine "neighborhood compatibility." It is my understanding that, until rescinded by the South Miami City Commission, or overturned by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City's Waiver of Plat criteria are presumed to be valid. Arguably, the.;:,r,eg airement that the ` building site be "equal to or''larger than the majority of the existing building sites''' simply enunciates a quantifiable measurement of the otherwise amorphous standard of "neighborhood compatibility." - Furthermore, I would also argue that said requirement is a valid exercise of governmental authority which seeks to curb the degradation of "mature" neighborhoods: II. APPLICANT FAILS TO MEET THE CRITERIA WHICH ARE A CONDITION PRECEDENT TO A WAIVER OF PLAT It is my understanding that a Waiver of Plat application must be considered in light of three criteria, which are: 1) whether the building sites created would be equal to or larger than the majority of the existing building sites and of the same character as the surrounding area (this shall be-demonstrated using copies of the official plat maps for the subject property and surrounding neighborhood), 2) whether the building site created would result in existing structures becoming nonconforming as they relate to setbacks and other applicable regulations of the land development regulations, and 3) whether the building site created would be free of encroachments from abutting buildable sites. Incident to the application process, the Planning &`Zoning Department analyzed the ,proposed building site in- light.o£ the above criteria. They concluded that the applicant's proposed building site would NOT be equal to or larger than the majority of the existing building sites. As part of their analysis, the Planning & Zoning Department determined that 'approximately 75% of the properties within a 500 foot radius (area requiring notice) were larger than both of the proposed properties. Accordingly, -it- should come as no surprise that the Planning & Zoning Department recommended that the Waiver of Plat should be DENIED. III. ATTENDANT DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY IS_ INCOMPATIBLE WITH NEIGHBORING_ PROPERTIES Even if the applicant had been able to meet the above criteria, the granting of a Waiver of Plat would be contrary to "neighborhood compatibility." Unfortunately, the applicant's property is part and parcel of a naturally occurring slough which runs through the neighborhood. As some long time residents can attest, this slough runs from the north to the south, at one time emptying into the man made canals just south of 62 Avenue and Miller Road. One older resident even noted how he used to watch surface water flow across Miller Road. Unfortunately, in recent years, residential development along the course of this slough has apparently altered the flow of water resulting in the increased flooding of neighboring properties. As you will note, _I have attached color', photocopies of photographs taken incident to flooding in October 2000. This flooding was not "temporary" but lasted upwards of two weeks. Said 'flooding led to both physical damage of structures and personal property on affected properties. The applicant, by his own admission, seeks to build on the property if the Waiver of Plat is granted. Interestingly, the area on which 'the applicant seeks to build is that which is flooded in the attachedlpictures. What concerns both myself and surrounding' property owners is the fact that "improvements" to the land may reoltricti or divert the flow of water adversely impacting neighboring properties. Curiously, in -a letter to the Planning Director dated June 25, 2003, applicant's counsel indicates that the applicant is ''amenable to the following conditions: That 'a berm be placed along the north and east property linen of proposed Parcel "B" said berm to be installed prior to the issuance' of a Certificate of - Completion for any structure (s) on Parcel "B "` This proposal is clearly contrary to the interest of neighboring property owners! We don't want the applicant to restrict the flow of water onto or through his property. To the extent a property owner can divert or restrict the flow .,,- - __of- water, said property owner simply shifts the impact of flooding onto adjoining properties. Put another way, by installing a levee or berm, or adding fill, said property owner- roves m his fi, , lot (both uratiy ly and literally) to P �T the detriment of neighboring property owners. Additionally, the applicant also indicates that he will be installing a septic tank on the subject; property. Given the potential for significant flooding demonstrated in the attached photos, neighboring property owners are extremely concerned with the possible leaching of effluent to the surface during times of flooding and the attendant health risks associated thereto. Furthermore, most of the surrounding properties rely upon wells for their water.. Accordingly, any contamination of ground water would have significant health consequences. Finally, in terms of "neighborhood compatibility ", I cannot overemphasize the fact that most of the surrounding properties are one acre estates with single one story structures. Matter of fact, the property which the applicant seeks to divide is presently 'a one acre estate with an existing single one story structure thereon. Needless to say, the "neighbors" would like to maintain the unique character of this neighborhood and vehemently OPPOSE the requested, Waiver of Plat. -77t ` 0-41, ZYE 4 b _ g x r ate' iv, r z T - i '- . _ tw ' c r —; 4 , .�1' '^iii a ors, q .� 8g �� �, Y s � �4. :. �` � t� " �_ �` e.F � _ � �� x ��' � � � � _ act � � _ - ��z� ' $ �g - � a 4, a _� � � ei�x�u `��_y 3 �sa� -- vFC� - z v 40w t M=1 1 UV 1 C a` } ;*m _ w e _ - ilv Jly Elm 3 _ V `ate .p bAeew '$ i" «, R ) July 24, 2003 TO: Hon. Horace G. Feliu, Mayor Hon. Mary Scott Russell, Vice Mayor Hon. Randy G. Wiscombe Hon. David D. Bethel Hon Dan McCrea FROM: Charles F. Ebert III 5201 SW 63 Avenue Miami, FL 33155 -6249 RE: Waiver of Plat 5243 SW 63 Ct South Miami, FL 33155 Pedro Infante, Applicant It is my understanding that this matter is scheduled for your consideration at the upcoming South Miami Commission meeting of July 29, 2003. Although I plan to attend this meeting, I don't know if circumstances, or the Commission's agenda, will allow me the opportunity to speak to this matter. Accordingly, I ant writing to you today. For the record, I am OPPOSED to the granting of the Waiver of Plat which the applicant seeks. Moreover, I do not believe the applicant meets the criteria which are a condition precedent to the granting of a Waiver of Plat. For sake of argument, I would like to address three issues. Said issues are as follows: I. VALIDITY OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In his presentation before the Planning Board, applicant's Legal counsel appeared to question the validity of the criteria used to determine "neighborhood compatibility." It is my understanding that, until rescinded by the South Miami City Commission, or overturned by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City's Waiver of Plat criteria are presumed to be valid. Arguably, the requirement that the buildinq -ite be "equal to or larger than the majority of the existing building sites" simply enunciates a quantifiable measurement of the otherwise amorphous standard of "neighborhood compatibility." Furthermore, I would also argue that said requirement is a valid exercise of governmental authority which seeks to curb the degradation of "mature" neighborhoods. II. APPLICANT FAILS TO MEET THE CRITERIA WHICH ARE A CONDITION PRECEDENT TO A WAIVER OF PLAT It is my understanding that a Waiver of Plat application must be considered in light of three criteria, which are: 1) whether the building sites created would be equal to or larger than the majority of the existing building sites and of the same character as the surrounding area (this shall, be demonstrated using copies of the official plat maps for the subject property and surrounding neighborhood), 2) whether the building site created would result in existing structures becoming nonconforming as they relate to setbacks and other applicable regulations of the land development regulations, and 3) whether the building site created would be free of encroachments from abutting buildable sites. Incident to the application process, the Planning & Zoning Department analyzed the proposed building site in light of the above criteria. They concluded that the applicant's proposed building site would NOT be equal to or larger than the majority of the existing building sites. As part of their analysis, the Planning & Zoning Department determined that approximately 750 of the properties within a 500 foot radius (area requiring notice) were larger than both of the proposed properties. Accordingly, it should come as no surprise that the Planning & Zoning Department recommended that the Waiver of Plat should be DENIED. III. ATTENDANT DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES Even if the applicant had been able to meet the above criteria, the granting of a Waiver of Plat would be contrary to "neighborhood compatibility." Unfortunately, the applicant's property is part and parcel of a naturally occurring slough which runs through the neighborhood. As some long time residents can attest, this slough runs from the north to the south, at time emptying into the man made canals just south of 62 Avenue and Miller Road. One older resident even noted how he used to watch surface water flow across Miller Road. Unfortunately, in recent years, residential development along the course of this slough has apparently altered the flow of water resulting in the increased flooding of neighboring properties. As you will note, I have attached color photocopies of photographs taken incident to flooding in October 2000. This flooding was not "temporary" but lasted upwards of two weeks. Said flooding led to both physical damage of structures and personal property on affected properties. The applicant, by his own admission, seeks to build on the property if the Waiver of Plat is granted. Interestingly, the area on which the applicant seeks to build is that which is flooded in the attached pictures.. What concerns both myself and surrounding property owners is the fact that "improvements" to the land may restrict or divert the flow of water adversely impacting neighboring properties. Curiously, in a letter to the Planning Director dated June 25, 2003, applicant's counsel indicates that the applicant is amenable to the following conditions: That a berm be placed along the north and east property lines of proposed Parcel "B" said berm to be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion for any structure(s) on Parcel "B ". This proposal is clearly contrary to the interest of neighboring property owners! We don't want the applicant to restrict the flow of water onto or through his property. To the extent a property owner can divert or restrict the flow of water, said property owner simply shifts the impact of flooding onto adjoining properties. Put another way, by installing a levee or berm, or adding fill, said property owner improves his lot (both figuratively and literally) to tha daLriment of neighboring property owners. Additionally, the applicant also indicates that he will be installing a septic tank on the subject property. Given the potential for significant flooding demonstrated in the attached photos, neighboring property owners are extremely concerned with the possible leaching of effluent to the surface during times of flooding and the attendant health risks associated thereto. Furthermore, most of the surrounding properties rely upon wells for their water. Accordingly, any contamination of ground water would have significant health consequences. Finally, in terms of "neighborhood compatibility ", I cannot overemphasize the fact that most of the surrounding properties are one acre estates with single one story structures. Matter of fact, the property which the applicant seeks to divide is presently a one acre estate with an existing single one story structure thereon. Needless to say, the "neighbors" would like to maintain the unique character of this neighborhood and vehemently OPPOSE the requested Waiver of Plat. 144, Or Z Y, I _2 1jr It Ep, MOM Wm ir Jt 4i. AZT -4o - - - - - - - - - - op F- i Pt. co 5a ��aiq lni Ak- - lit Ai g E Cr ' 3 u a y - 4 jk4 Al jkv!r '' �' _ # � W _ }"mss q . _ yet z ar i P ♦ IA ��' .may - � ♦ � .,�, *� .. ; a _ w f { s s 44 4 _- �-�. - - - k,, t 'i Fan- r _ - ate' .i''^ °r'1 ff" r _ �`� -.�: � u_ lu At - � - �► a � �; max,. � } ,� r - r w t �� RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR & CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO A REQUEST FOR A WAIVER OF PLAT PURSUANT TO SECTION 20- 4.2(B) OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND SECTION 28 -4 OF THE COUNTY CODE, REGARDING THE PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE RS -2, "SEMI- ESTATE RESIDENTIAL," LOCATED AT 5243 SW 63RD COURT, SOUTH MIAMI FLORIDA 33155; PROVIDING FOR BONDING PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 -9 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR A LEGAL DESCRIPTION; AND, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. i WHEREAS, Mr. Pedro Infante, owner of the property located at 5243 SW 63`d Court, submitted an application requesting a waiver of plat, pursuant to Section 20- 4.2(b) of the Land Subdivision Regulations; and,' WHEREAS, Planning staff has recommended denial of the application based upon incompatibility with the surrounding area; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Board conducted a public hearing on the request at its meeting on July 8, 2003 and recommended denial by a vote of 4 -2 of the request pursuant to Section 20- 4.2(b) of the Land Subdivision Regulations; and, WHEREAS,, the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami with advise and recommendation from the Planning Board deny the tentative plat pursuant to Section 20- 4.2(b) of the Land Subdivision Regulations; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section I: Properties created by this application will be equal or smaller than fewer than 25% of all the properties, within the 500 feet radius (area for notification) of the newly created property and will be out of character with the rest of the surrounding neighborhood. Section 2:The application submitted by Mr. Pedro Infante, requesting approval of a proposed separation of the lot legally described in Section 3, pursuant to Section 20- 4.2(b) of the Land Subdivision Regulations and, is hereby denied. Section 3: See attachment A Section 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon approval. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 52003. ATTEST: APPROVED: CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY sb K: \Comm Items\2003 \07 -29 -03 \Waiver of Plat 5243 SW 63rd Ct Resol.doc MAYOR Commission Vote: Mayor Feliu: Vice Mayor Russell: Commissioner McCrea: Commissioner Bethel: Commissioner Wiscombe: ATTACHMENT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parent Tract: ALL OF BLOCK 2, LA HAMACA, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED PLAT BOOK 51 AT PAGE 25 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 37,524 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS OR 0.79 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL "A ": BLOCK 2, LA HAMACA, LESS THE NORTH 135' THERE OF, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 51 AT PAGE 25 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 21,474 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS, OR 0.49 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL "B ": THE NORTH 135,' OF BLOCK 2, LA HAMACA, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 51 AT PAGE 25 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 16,050 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS, OR 0.37 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 24 5243 SW 63rd Court 4 SUBJECT i PROPERTY o n i I ND -Te _ ct , s� 3 ZIR ch k z& G � f SW.._55TH i k �y� o4`.. a.� �a ....,._._. mow,..,.._. ........... _ ......... _... _. .._......... _ ..... . .. . ..... ...._..: .........� ._. i v Z �a �� ,. �a "fir. •.,. CD UZ 0 100 200 300 600 900 1,200 Feet 8 A1� 5W 58TH -ST ` :t Y AY3 x� f. 0 100 200 300 600 900 1,200 Feet 8 A1� Lots Surounding; 5243 SW 63 Ct. Properties East of 63 Ave Within 500 Ft. Radius Ref. # Address Lot Size (Sq. Ft.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 5201 SW 63 AVE 42,689 5275 SW 63 AVE' 41,382 09 -4024- 026 -0090 50,965 5325 SW 63 AVE 43,124 5151 SW 63 AVE 82,764 5080 SW 62 AVE 108,900 30 -4024- 000 -0381 43,560 5250 SW 62 AVE 78,844 5262 SW 62 AVE 49,658 5300 SW 62 AVE 47,480 5075 S.W 63 AVE 39,640 6262 SW 50 TERR 64,469 5330 SW 62 AVE 47,480 Properties West of 63 Ave Within' 500 Ft. Radius 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 6300 SW 50 ST 54,450 5105 SW 63 CT 46,174 5300 SW 63 AVE 25,265 5330 SW 63 AVE 21,649 30- 4024 -000 -0370 54,450 5200 SW 63 CT 54,450 09- 4024= 026 -0010 18,295 5228 SW 63 CT 36,590 5301 SW 63 CT 17,729 5331 SW 63 CT 21,519 5151 SW 64 AVE 37,897 5175 SW 64 AVE 62,726 5195 SW 64 AVE 65,776 5251 SW 64 AVE 65,340 5240 SW 63 CT 13,094 5300 SW 63 CT 13,094 5340 SW 63 CT 15,668 5285 SW 64 AVE 13,759 5305 SW 64 AVE 12,707 I el a N CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI w E 5243 SW 63rd Court S SUBJECT SSA" .k !Yd 44�MY I PROPERTY �.. N z f F0 # F1 TE ....: cl Ito IN n ; -i r a� � tAl._53RD F 2 cc fX �tt o � c S W.- .55TFII F� MILLER.. -RD /' � -Tm I € € LY half! 57TH ST 1p ,P uyn 3 :c crgEi'4 ` .EIS S wi x may' k, Ted �u 57 ...._pQ,, . . . . . . . .... "N �3 y SVU 58TH..ST : .SW......58TH..:. ST. ... ME 0 100 200 300 600 900 1,200 Feet 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 5201 'SW 63 AVE - 42,689 5275 SW 63 AVE 41,382 09- 4024 -026 -0090 50,965 5325 SW 63 AVE 43,124 151 SW 63 AVE 82,764 5080 SW 62 AVE 108,900 30- 4024- 000 -0381 43,560 5250 SW 62 AVE 78,844 5262 SW 62 AVE 49,658 5300 SW 62 AVE 47,480 5075 SW 63 AVE 39,640 6262 SW 50 TERR 64,469 5330 SW 62 AVE 47,480 Properties West of 63 Ave Within 500 Ft. Radius 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 6300 SW 50 ST 54,450 5105 SW 63 CT 46,174 5300 SW 63 AVE 25,265 5330 SW 63 AVE 21,649 30- 4024- 000. -0370: 54,450 5200 SW' 63 CT 54,450 09 -4024- 026 -0010 18,295 5228 SW 63 CT 36,590 5301 SW 63 CT 17,729 5331 SW 63 CT 21,519 5151 SW 64 AVE 37,897 5175 SW 64 AVE 62,726 5195 SW 64 AVE 65,776 5251 SW 64 AVE 65,340 5240 SW 63 CT 13,094 5300 SW 63 CT 13,094 5340 SW 63 CT 15,668 5285 SW 64 AVE 13,759 5305 SW 64 AVE 12,707 a CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 24 5243 SW 63rd Court N W E s 0 100 200 300 600 900 1,200 Feet SUBJECT PROPERTY ..... CC C pp „ _ } :z N k 1T. y G—TE .... l �. r —E3rj cl € ARD... E3 N 17- sow Ito > D G 8W......55TN... . v 3 E i i k ..MILLER ... " - _..m...'.._....r.. "".."'._" ; , NEI I I �; ...: i. Yk -------- SW-57-1 N 4.57 ' �3 � 3 a 'y =%x�z, '' ''' Mk �•�3': E! 5 mi �� � A� AM >� xw4 : SW SW.....5&TN....ST.... FTT ".....:..... n: 0 100 200 300 600 900 1,200 Feet 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 5201 SW 63 AVE 42,689 5275 SW 63 AVE 41,382 09 -4024- 026 - 0090 " 50,965 5325 SW 63 AVE 43,124 5151 SW 63 AVE 82,764 5080 SW 62 AVE 108,900 30- 4024- 000 =0381 43,560 5250 SW 62 AVE 78,844 5262 SW 62 AVE 49,658 5300 SW 62 AVE 47,480 5075 SW 63 AVE 39,640' 6262 SW 50 TERR; 64,469 5330 SW 62 AVE 47,480 Properties West of 63 Ave Within 500 Ft.:Radius 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 6300 SW 50 ST 54,450 5105 SW 63 CT 46,174 5300 SW 63 AVE 25,265 5330 SW 63 AVE 21,649 30 -4024- 000 -0370 54,450. 5200 SW 63 CT 54,450 09- 4024- 026 -0010 18,295 5228 SW 63 CT 36,590 5301 SW 63 CT 17,729 5331 SW 63 CT 21,519 5151 SW 64 AVE 37,897 5175 SW 64 AVE 62,726 5195 SW 64 AVE 65,776 5251 SW 64 AVE 65,340 5240 SW 63 CT 13,094 5300 SW 63 CT 13,094 5340 SW 63 CT 15,668 5285 SW 64 AVE 13,759 5305 SW 64 AVE 12,707 N CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI W E 5243 SW 63rd Court s 114 ,1 0 is SUBJECT MI. PROPERTY a:IIkT p ....� ........... ........ .... ........ 7- o %W--53RD.- ze a 1 .. S C 1 591W i SW_,.55TJ 1... IN x x . .... . .. ....... . ..... . . ........ ;.: .._._ _ ...... _ W- ..,... _.. _._.. p.9 ,.......... -.SPIV .•.57Tk1 ST 0) %x _._. . � I :�� 3 IN Wig 3, S�GU . -58TH ST _ sw .58rH..sT... _ ...... 0 100 200 300 600 900 1,200 Feet Properties East of 63 Ave Within 500 Ft. Radius Ref. # Address Lot Size (Sq. Ft.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 5201 SW 63 AVE 42,689 5275 SW 63 AVE 41,382 09 -4024= 026 -0090 50,965 5325 SW 63 AVE 43,124 5151 SW 63 AVE 82,764 5080 SW 62 AVE 108,900 30- 4024- 000 -0381 43,560 5250 SW 62 AVE 78,844 5262 SW 62 AVE 49,658 5300 SW 62 AVE 47,480 5075 SW 63 AVE ' 39,640 6262 SW 50 TERR 64,469` 5330 SW 62 AVE 47,480 Properties West of 63 Ave Within 500 Ft. Radius 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 6300 SW 50 ST 54,450 5105 SW 63 CT 46,174 5300 SW 63 AVE 25,265 5330 SW 63 AVE 21,649 30- 4024 -000 -0370 54,450 5200 SW 63 CT 54,450 09- 4024 -026- 0010 18,295 5228 SW 63 CT 36,590 5301 SW 63 CT 17,729 5331 SW 63 CT 21,519 5151 SW 64 AVE 37,897 5175 SW 64 AVE 62,726 5195 SW 64 AVE 65,776 5251 SW 64 AVE 65,340 5240 SW 63 CT 13,094 5300 SW 63 CT 13,094 5340 SW 63 CT 15,668 5285 SW 64 AVE 13,759 5305 SW 64 AVE 1 12,707 a e CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI .Z 5243 SW 63rd Court N W E s .....MI.LLER.•RDdI#I __ _.. _ ---- 1... . SUBJECT PROPERTY TZID CIA/ FlIkIrM-C. , � x$ .. ... �.«.... ..........�...."- JN"Y- x-- vJ•M "1 ST ...... .......... .... x, Ulf 53RD -.. x � ��- SuU 58TH... ST i.SV! Cb 1 Y fi NM � t SW— ...55TH... �s N W E s 0 100 200 300 600 900 1,200 Feet .....MI.LLER.•RDdI#I __ _.. _ ---- 1... . , � x$ .. ... �.«.... ..........�...."- JN"Y- x-- vJ•M "1 ST ...... .......... .... x, 2 p Pv..:....------ SUU._..57TH.. DE3........ SuU 58TH... ST i.SV! 0 100 200 300 600 900 1,200 Feet 5201 SW 63 AVE 42,689 5275 SW 63 AVE 41,382 09- 4024 - 026 -0090 50,965 5325 SW 63 AVE 43,124 5151 SW 63 AVE 82,764 5080 SW 62 AVE 108,900 30 -4024- 000 -0381 43,560 5250 SW 62 AVE 78,844 5262 SW 62 AVE 49,658 5300 SW 62 AVE 47,480 5075 SW 63 AVE 39,640 6262 SW 50 TERR 64,469 5330 SW 62 AVE 47,480 Properties West of 63 Ave Within 500 Ft. Radius 6300 SW 50 ST 54,450 5105 SW 63 CT 46,174 5300 SW 63 AVE 25,265 5330 SW 63 AVE 21;649 30- 4024 - 000 -0370 54,450 5200 SW 63 CT 54,450 09- 4024 -026 =0010 18,295 5228 SW 63 CT 36,590 5301 SW 63 CT 17,729 5331 SW 63 CT 21,519 5151 SW 64 AVE 37,897 5175 SW 64 AVE 62,726 5195 SW 64 AVE 65,776 5251 SW 64 AVE 65,340 5240 SW 63 CT 13,094 5300 SW 63 CT 13,094 5340 SW 63 CT 15,668 5285 SW 64 AVE 13,759 5305 SW 64 AVE 12,707 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 24 5243 SW 63rd Court m MAI Feet 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11. 12 13 5201 SW 63 AVE 42,689 5275 SW 63 AVE 41,382 09- 4024- 026 -0090 50,965 5325 SW 63 AVE 43,124 5151 SW 63 AVE 82,764 5080 SW 62 AVE 108,900 30 -4024 - 000 -0381 43,560 5250 SW 62 AVE 78,844 5262 SW 62 AVE 49,658 5300 SW 62 AVE 47,480 5075 SW 63 AVE 39,640 6262 SW 50 TERR 64,469 5330 SW 62 AVE 47,480 Properties West of 63 Ave Within 500 Ft. Radius 14' 15 16 17 18. 19' 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 6300 SW 50 ST 54,450 5105 SW 63 CT 46,174 5300 SW 63 AVE 25,265 5330 SW 63 AVE 21,649 30- 4024. 000 -0370' 54,450 5200 SW 63 CT li 54,450 09 -4024- 026 -0010 ` 18,295 5228 SW 63 CT 36,590 5301 SW 63 CT 17,729 5331 SW 63 CT 21,519 5151 SW 64 AVE 37,897 5175 SW 64 AVE 62,726 5195 SW 64 AVE 65,776' 5251 SW 64 AVE 65,340 5240 SW 63 CT 13,094 5300 SW 63 CT 13,094 5340 SW 63 CT 15,668 5285 SW 64 AVE 13,759' 5305 SW 64 AVE, a MILLER HOMEOWNERS Date: July 29, 2003 ,A To: The City of South Miami City Commission Re: PB -03 -012, Pedro Infante, 5243 SW 63 Court I. (name) e c r currentl y residing at (address) t (o i2 C7 7 am opposed to Mr. Pedro Infante's request for Waiver of Plat. I am opposed to diminishing "green space" and am opposed to lot - splitting in the City of South Miami. Respectfully submitted, (signature and date) (telephone) a EWA- Cl � CMI-1-1 Date: July 29, 2003 To: The City of South Miami City Commission Re: PB-03 -012, Pedro Infante, 5243 SW 63 Court I, (name) a r-e �, ° currently residing at (address am opposed to Mr. Pedro Infante 's request for Waiver of Plat. I am opposed to diminishing "green space" and am opposed to lot - splitting in the City of South Miami. Respectfully submitted, C 72 i'ast .^ 'r U.. r.:a. .. q�.. .,. a: <„r . �;-Te v .. .. :.;'> ,... "%3... ^�— •- r--- Ta"$.�q— �?`u'. *,+�N; 3Tei`xi." -..f. Y %- „�'A•^�hY.,;� �'"T�” �C`�?t �= �A�".,sFVT'e4' �'^'� k 3956612449 Rcp.%ne.ct-fu-lv ----x l-Of NIN V� MA Date: July 29, 2003 To: The City of South Miami City Commission Re: PB -03 -012, Pedro Infante, 5243 SW 63 Court I, (name) Z -a Tr , currently residing at (address) am opposed to Mr. Pedro Infante's request for Waiver of f lat. I am opposed to diminishing "green space" and am opposed to lot- splitting in the City of South Miami. Respectfully submitted, W. � 0�,A r 1VIILLLR L!!� I A I r,-� rl UIVJ- rU W iNrIN�3 kffEvv� July 2003 Re: Planning Board Application No. PB -03 -012 Applicant - Pedro Infante Property Location 5243 SW 63rd Court Dear Neighbor, As you may know, the above referenced applicant requested a Waiver of Plat to sub - divide a builders one acre estate home into two buildable lots in order to construct an additional dwelling. The applicant presented his request to the City of South Miami's Planning and Zoning Board during a Public Hearing on July 8t After listening to objections and expressions of approval, the Planning Board is recommending that the City Commission DENY the applicant! s request for Waiver of Plat. The City Commission will address the request during its regular meeting on Tuesday, July 29, 2003 at 7:30p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, 6130 Sunset Drive. As residents in the neighborhood adjoining the respective property, we would like your support in expressing to the City Commission that we strongly object to the Waiver of Flat because of the many ways this would adversely impact our neighborhood. Most of us selected to live, raise our families and invest in this area because of the quiet surroundings, low density and unique character of the neighborhood. All of these qualities would be threatened by the potential reduction in lot sizes and additional homes. Our goal is to help protect our homes and neighborhood and to help preserve it for future generations. Please express your objection to the above request for Waiver of Plat in person by attending' the City Commission meeting on July 29th, or in writing by signing the attached letter. Sincerely, Miller Estates Homeowners Croup opposed to Mr. Pedro Infante's request for Waiver of .Plat. I a.m opposed to diminishing "green space" and a apposed to lot -spl itti-ng in the City of South Miami. Respectfully submitt d., 7 (3 paluos mil 3tE1 29 de julio, 2003 Atencion: The City of South Miami City Commission Ref: PB- 03- 0I2,'Pedro Infante, 5243 SW 63 Court Yo, (nombre) 9 residente de (direccion) 9 me opongo a la peticion (Waiver of Plat) del Sr. Pedro Infante. Yo me opougo a disminuir las "areas verde" y la division de lotes'en la ciudad de South Miami. Respetuosamente, (firma y fecha) (teiefono) W, William Rothman 6380 SW 50th Street Miami, FL 33155 305 -663 -9582 rothman(imiamiaedu June 25, 2003 To: The City of South Miami Re: Planning Board Application Nos. PB -03 -012 Pedro Infante 5243 SW 63' Ct, P`$-' 82= 6kfs"�pip�ra�It1�Mla�1i -60�A Sri% �r4i 'sSS•�- I,C- ��Q•.- �W-- $A�' -ti trPPt In reference to the above issues, the applicants have requested a WAIVER OF PLAT to sub- divide their properties in order to construct additional dwellings. As residents in the neighborhood adjoining the respective properties located at: 52443 SW 63rd Ct. and 5900 SW 94t Street we strongly object to the many ways this would impact the neighborhood. We selected this area and invested in our homes because of the quiet surroundings, low density and unique character of the neighborhood. All of these qualities are threatened by the potential reduction in lot sites and additional homes. We respectfully request that you help us protect our homes and neighborhood by denying the above WAIVERS OF PLAT. Signed: /^ _ - r _. -• Name: William Rothman Address: 6380 SW 50 Street, Miami, FL 33155 Phone number: 305 -663 -9582 Date: June 25, 2003 �� .,. FRANCES WOOLARD MELTZER 8340 SW. 60 Avenue Miami, Florida 33143 Home: (305) 665 - 5654. - Work: (305) 349 -7368 July 9, 2003 The Honorable Horace Feliu Mayor, City of South Miami 6130 Sunset DR Miami FL 33143 Dear Mayor: Thank you for your attendance at last evening's planning board meeting. I believe it is your intention to closely watch these community boards and provide leadership. • May I question why six members were on the board last evening. What purpose is served and why was an extra member present. This is ludicrous and the exact reason why your attention and leadership is needed for these important city functions. a Mr. Basu is well - meaning but has placed himself in a difficult situation: why overturn the former planning board director's research and allow the lot on 84"' Street to be split after homeowners spent several evenings waiting for a chance to speak against this lot splitting. We never had a chance to speak and now we have no chance at all. What mess is this? • Only one member on that 6 -panel board ask decisive questions aimed at getting facts straight. • The attorney representing the city was again contemptuous and by her comportment clearly showed her interests were pro- development and her mind was closed. She was poorly dressed and, therefore, her admonishment to the taxpayers present that we were in a quasi-judicial hearing and could not clap our approval fell on unbelieving ears. Kindly follow closely the matter of Tot splitting and vote "yes" to any resolution that makes it easier for commissioners to deny development that places two 2- story houses or giant one -story houses on small lots. Again thank you for your presence at this meeting. Sincerely, Frances Meltzer C: Commissioners Wiscomb ,Russell, McCrae and Bethel .,. K/TTT T FTZ 1P 'T'A'T'F T- T0MFnWNF.R 4� GRC)TTP July 24, 2003 TO: Hon. Horace G. Feliu, Mayor e...n. Mary Scott Russell, Vice Mayor Hon. Randy G. Wiscombe Hon. David D. Bethel Hon. Dan McCrea FROM': Charles F. Ebert III 5201 SW 63 Avenue Miami, FL 33155 -6249 RE: Waiver of Plat 5243 SW 63 Ct South Miami, FL 33155 Pedro Infante, Applicant It is my understanding that this matter is scheduled for your consideration at the upcoming South Miami Commission meeting of July 29, 2003. Although I plan to ,attend this meeting, I don't know if circumstances, or the Commission's agenda, will allow me the opportunity to speak to this matter. Accordingly, I am writing to you today. For the record, I am OPPOSED to the granting of the Waiver of Plat which the applicant seeks. Moreover, I do not believe the applicant meets the criteria which are a condition precedent to the granting of a Waiver of Plat. For sake of argument, I would like to address three issues. Said issues are as follows: I. VALIDITY OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In his presentation before the Planning Board, applicant's legal counsel appeared to question the validity of the criteria used to determine "neighborhood compatibility." It is my understanding that, until rescinded by the South Miami City Commission, or overturned by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City's Waiver of Plat criteria are presumed to be valid. Arguably, the requirement that the building site be "equal to or larger than the majority of the existing building sites" simply enunciates a quantifiable measurement of the otherwise amorphous standard of "neighborhood compatibility." Furthermore, I would also argue that said requirement is a valid exercise of governmental authority which seeks to curb the degradation of "mature" neighborhoods. II. APPLICANT FAILS TO MEET THE CRITERIA WHICH ARE A CONDITION PRECEDENT TO A WAIVER OF PLAT It is my understanding that a Waiver of Plat application must be considered in light of three criteria, which are: 1) whether the building sites created would be equal to or larger than the majority of the existing building sites and of the same character 'as the surrounding area ( this - shall,be demonstrated using copies of the official plat maps for'the subject property and surrounding neighborhood), 2) whether the building site created would result in existing structures becoming nonconforming as they relate to setbacks and'other applicable regulations of the land development regulations, and 3) whether the building site created would be free of encroachments from abutting buildable sites. Incident to the application process, the Planning & Zoning Department analyzed the proposed building site in light of the above criteria. They concluded that the applicant's proposed building site would NOT be equal to or larger than the majority of the existing building sites. As part of their analysis, the Planning & Zoning,Department determined that approximately 75% of the properties within a 500 foot radius (area requiring notice) were larger than both of the proposed properties. Accordingly, it, should come as no surprise that the Planning & Zoning Department recommended that the Waiver of Plat should'be DENIED III. ATTENDANT DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES Even if the applicant had been able to meet the above criteria, the granting of a Waiver of Plat would be contrary to "neighborhood compatibility." Unfortunately, the applicant's property is part and parcel of a naturally occurring slough which runs through the neighborhood. As some long time residents can attest, this slough runs from the north to the south, at one time emptying into the man made canals just south of 62 Avenue and Miller Road. One older resident even noted how he used to watch surface water flow across Miller Road. Unfortunately, in recent years, residential development along the course of this slough has apparently altered the flow of water resulting in the increased flooding of neighboring properties. As you will note, I have attached color photocopies of photographs taken incident to flooding in October 2000. This flooding was not "temporary" but lasted upwards of two weeks. Said flooding led to both physical damage of structures and personal property on affected properties. The applicant, by his own admission, seeks to build on the property if the Waiver of Plat is granted. Interestingly, the area on which the applicant seeks to build is that which is flooded in the attached pictures. What concerns both myself and surrounding property owners is the fact that "improvements" to the land may ;restrict or divert the flow of water adversely impacting neighboring properties. Curiously, in a letter to the Planning Director dated June 25, 2003, applicant's counsel indicates that the applicant is amenable to the following conditions: That a berm be placed along the north and east property lines of proposed Parcel "B" said berm to be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion for any structure(s) on Parcel "B This proposal is clearly contrary to the interest of neighboring property owners! We don't want the applicant to restrict the flow of water onto or through, his property. To the extent a property owner can divert or restrict the flow of water, said property owner simply_ shifts, the impact of flooding onto adjoining properties. Put another way, by installing a levee or berm, or adding fill, said property owner improves his lot (both figuratively and literally) to the detriment of neighboring property owners. Additionally, the applicant also indicates that he will be installing a septic tank on the subject property. Given the potential for significant flooding demonstrated in the attached photos, neighboring property owners are extremely concerned with the possible leaching of effluent to the surface during times of flooding and the attendant health risks associated thereto. Furthermore, most of the surrounding properties rely upon wells for their water. Accordingly, any contamination of ground water would have significant health consequences: Finally, in terms of "neighborhood compatibility ", I cannot overemphasize the fact that most of the surrounding properties are one acre estates with single one story structures. Matter of fact, the property which the applicant seeks to divide is presently a one acre estate with an existing single one story structure thereon. Needless to say, the "neighbors" would like to maintain the unique character of this neighborhood and vehemently OPPOSE the requested Waiver of Plat. r x $F „5 id AN a; v W i v �»m��: . � y� � \ . . a \ %\:� > \ 2 \ � � » ». ,�� � � \ � .: p � � . > »� » r �� � \� � � /����\ §�,�� : d� �� � / % :d w � .� �« � >� . \y »� � � < . . ,� . . «wy^ \ \� � \ \ � �� WM� € - s, s € 5O A b Alir3 a ;gg WM� ti sn"; As-ti n irnb It-ol o a o SF AS--2, 15-,f6do SF P,5-3, ^S'A;vnm-Ai /0,060 SF k5—+, 6,00o SF t CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 5243 SW 63rd Court gxl SUBJECT PROPE T Al k rtm a F n i ie mr RI All � y s Cj pp t ml � ry S�'A A z. 3 y 1 µFs i n r,.,� I r..? jll 9 rim [ R.y Ll P 4 gt Z9 jF r✓ ,...._.._DAd'ILLE .... ,kF#k „'s ,n y,5' " fi ..,.. . S #'•�• { r t , 0 100 200 300 600 900 1,200 Feet 0 f � �a 31 cy .:,.. ,. ,�... e.-�y' 9-: awri 9-0 of All4 2_1 6 LO fib/ 13 �4'•, n�' �' � 'e'�'''T�ts'���;7�*'m'T4"� =�z�, � >'�"s?.3nb. ., �'. rs,� . >. u.�3 1 n:/�„3 -f� 4 l Al IT VF >� �� # -' I Y r... r' q T. 3 .i k 7� aia { yrc: t fl y R" -< 2- 314 n,s r' ..... ....... . ._ ftk .. . . . �. y ta� � �� �'y �� �.� \� � g � � y� � � \� - / � » �< »: E «w °. � A2� � � � �` ^ . N As-1, SF P-9 6 a 0 SF 5F SF WWII 0 100 200 300 600 900 1,200 Feet 4 _ E• 3, ® `4� td it It' ;t f } q €. �F e t l� ,r,T� nrvs —�o 7�°t�'rr^�,,.,.., # �^ ,- .s_"_ 7 s �,�, �st17 �r; aT � ?* M rw f,, 7q r? , ,€' i ,°m sh ";.''""'_,' t �,;,n `, v..r'#., n-37 ; 4,=??t3, 's^ w✓ mm =g � 7n"tK ru^i. , "-w e 36 of 36 DOCUMENTS Jose L. Machado, Maria Ortega, Jose Baeza and Nubro Corporation, Dade County, Petitioners, v. Barbara Musgrove, Linda Varner, Ron Weeks, June Still and Bird- Kendall Homeowners' Association, Respondents No. 81 -415 Court of Appeals of Florida, Third District 519 So. 2d 629; 1987 Fla. App. LEMS 9281; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1728 July 14,1987, Filed SUBSEQUENT HISTORY: proposed 140,000 square foot office complex [ * *1] incompatible with other uses in the area and violative of On rehearing En Banc February 23, 1988; Reported the land use plan. at 1988 Fla. App. LEA7S 705. The 8.5 acre site of the proposed commercial use is within the area covered by a neighborhood [ * *2] study PRIOR HISTORY: called the West Dade Ranch Area Study which limits the On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for area to ranchlands, nurseries and croplands. The ` Dade County, Moie J. L. Tendrich, Richard Y. Feder and neighborhood` study; an element of the land use plan, is Sidney B. Shapiro, Judges. Case No. 87 -415. the subject of an ordinance now codified at section 2- 116.7, Dade County Code. This application came before the County COUNSEL:- Commission on two occasions. In the first appearance, Papy, Poole, Weissenborn & Papy and Sheridan K. on November 21, 1985, both the Planning Director and Weissenborn and Charles Papy; Robert A. Ginsburg, the Zoning Director recommended that the application be County; Attorney, and Robert L. Krawcheck, Assistant denied. The Zoning Director expressed an opinion that County Attorney, for Petitioners. the proposed RU -5A zoning, would be incompatible with John G. Fletcher, for Respondents. the Area Study and the agricultural and institutional uses on the east side of S.W. 127th Avenue. nl He was specifically concerned that "approval of semi- JUDGES: professional office uses in this area could prompt similar Hubbart and Daniel S. Pearson and Ferguson, JJ. or commercial uses on other properties in the area which could be detrimental." Administrative ` action was OPINION-BY: deferred. PER CURIAM OPINION: ill The site is at the southwest corner of S.W. 127th Avenue and Sunset Drive in Dade County. [ *630] ,Petitioners sought to have their property Surrounding property includes two churches to rezoned from GU (interim zoning) to RU -5A the north, a plant nursery to the south, and single (professional offices) in an area designated by the family homes (RU -1) to the west. Lands comprehensive land use plan as estate residential - -up to immediately west are unimproved. Dade County two units per gross acre. They seek certiorari review of a and the applicant describe the plant nursery as a circuit court decision reversing the County [ *631] commercial use. Both the Planning Director and Commission's grant of the requested change. Applying Zoning Director treat it as consistent with an the "fairly debatable" standard the circuit court held the agricultural use. ,r,T� nrvs —�o 7�°t�'rr^�,,.,.., # �^ ,- .s_"_ 7 s �,�, �st17 �r; aT � ?* M rw f,, 7q r? , ,€' i ,°m sh ";.''""'_,' t �,;,n `, v..r'#., n-37 ; 4,=??t3, 's^ w✓ mm =g � 7n"tK ru^i. , "-w Page 2 519 So. 2d 629, *; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 928.1,' * *; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1728 Broward County, 502 So.2d 931 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).' [ * *3] The ;plan is likened to a constitution for all future When the matter came before the County development within the governmental boundary. Commission "a second time on January 23, 1986, the O Loane v. ; O'Rourke, 231 Cal.App.2d 774, 782, 42 Planning Director was still firmly of the view that office Cal Rptr. 283, 288 (1965). zoning on the site would set a precedent for similar Zoning, on the other hand, is the means by which the requests on undeveloped sites in the area causing erosion comprehensive plan is implemented, City of Jacksonville of an already Swindling area set aside for ranches and Beach v. Grubbs, 461 So.2d 160 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), farmland. However, the Zoning Director had changed his and involves the exercise of discretionary powers within view, , recommending approval primarily because "the limits imposed by the plan. Baker v. Milwaukie, 533 property to the east across S.W. 125th Avenue has been P.2d at 775. It is said that a zoning ,action not in approved for a temple and property to the northeast has accordance with a - comprehensive plan is ultra vires. been approved for a private school." Haar, In Accordance With A Comprehensive Plan, at Testimony was heard from long -time area residents- 1156. - farmers, ranchers, and single - family homeowners- -who II opposed the proposed` zoning for fear that it would bring burdensome traffic and alter the character of the area. STANDARD OF REVIEW; BURDEN OF PROOF The applicant presented exhibits and legal argument. In a It is well settled that a zoning action is an exercise of session closed to the public, County Commissioners legislative power to which a reviewing court applies the thereafter approved the zoning request on a 3 -2 vote; deferential fairly debatable test. See e.g., Southwest At the outset we note that the Zoning Director's Ranches, 502 So.2d' at 935. If the zoning action is one reason in support of 'a recommendation for approval of where reasonable people could differ as to its propriety, the commercial project - -that properties to the east had i.e., whether the action is arbitrary, [ * *6] capricious, or been approved for a school and temple- -was totally otherwise an abuse of discretion, the administrative irrelevant to the land use plan ;consistency [ * *4] decision will not be disturbed by a reviewing court. question. The recommendation was thus entitled to no Dade Savings & Loan Assn v. City of North Miami, 458 consideration. Cf. Hall v. Korth, 244 So.2d 766 (Fla. 3d So.2d 861 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). DCA 1971). Schools and churches as defined in section Part H of chapter 163, Florida Statutes, called the 33 -18,: Dade County Code, unlike commercial offices, Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land are contemplated in estate residential zones so long as Development' Regulation Act, and the local they satisfy the impact requirements of that section and comprehensive plans which it mandates, are not zoning section 33- 311(d), for unusual uses. See Metropolitan laws. The statute's requirement that all zoning action Dade County v. Fuller, 497 So. 2d 1322 (Fla. 3d DCA conform to an approved land use plan is, in effect, a 1986), and Board of County Commis v. First Free Will limitation on a local government's otherwise broad Baptist Church, 374 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). zoning powers. Maryland- National Capital Park & I Planning Comm'n v.' Mayor'& Council of Rockville, 272 Md. 550, 325 A.2d 748 (1974). Thepurpose' of the statute PLANNING AND ZONING AS SEPARATE is to accomplish, inter alia, orderly,growth „protection of FUNCTIONS resources an& stability of land use throughout the state. § Application of the fairly debatable standard to both 163.3161(7), Fla. Stat. (1985). n2 the land use and zoning questions, as is often done, tends to obscure the difference between their distinct functions. Land use planning and zoning are different exercises of n2 That the land use plan does restrict local sovereign power, Baker v. City of Milwaukie, 271 Or. zoning power becomes increasingly clear with 500, 533 P.2d 772 (Or. 1975); Haar, In Accordance With each legislative session. Sections, 163.3177(6), A Comprehensive Plan, 68 Harv.L.Rev. 1154 (1968); Florida Statutes (198.5), requires that the future therefore, a proper - analysis, for review purposes, land use map designate the exact location and requires that they be considered separately. extent of all proposed commercial uses. Sections 163.3167, 163.3177, and ` 163.3184, Florida A local comprehensive land use plan is a statutorily Statutes (Supp. 1986), mandate that local mandated legislative plan to control and direct the use comprehensive plans coordinate with regional [ * *5] and development [ *632] of property within a and state plans, subject to review for compliance county or municipality. § 163.3167(1),r Fla. Stat. with state and regional land use plans. See (1985); Southwest Ranches Homeowners Assn v. deHaven -Smith & Paterson, The 1968 Glitch Bill - °T +h.�%.. f i�.,�x;n?'ti:'L� -#SiF i�cx '?'fiv,a �a._; �+.`r✓'"`;`i§F�., "CS i Page 3 519 So. 2d 629, *; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9281, * *; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1728 Missing Links In Growth Management, Fla. the :statutes permitted a reviewing court to further Envtl. & Urban Issues, October 1986, at 4. consider the extent and degree of a clear` inconsistency. n3 Two recent cases, Alachua County v. Eagle's Nest [ * *7l Farms, Inc. and Hillsborough County v. ,Putney, appear to follow a strict adherence view although, as in Sengra, The test in reviewing a' challenge to a zoning action there was no in -depth examination of the meaning of on grounds that a proposed project is inconsistent with consistency.` the comprehensive land use plan is whether the zoning authority's determination that a proposed development conforms to each element and the objectives of the land n3 On this point we differ with the unique use plan is supported by competent and substantial' view adopted by the court in Southwest Ranches evidence. The traditional and non- deferential standard of that it may weigh competing public and private strict judicial scrutiny applies. interests for determining consistency even where Strict scrutiny is not defined in the land use 'cases a proposed development fails to confonn to one which use the phrase but its meaning can be ascertained or more critical elements of the land use plan. from the common definition-of the separate words. Strict The court rejected Judge Cowart's strict implies rigid exactness, People v. Gardiner, 33 A.D. 204, adherence view articulated in Mosher which we 53 N.Y.S. 451 (1893), or precision, Black's Law think more closely follows the statute. Dictionary 1275 (5th ed. 1979). A thing scrutinized'' has been subjected to minute investigation. Commonwealth [ * *10] v. White, 271 Pa. 584, 115 A. -870 (1922). Strict scrutiny is thus the process whereby a court makes a detailed III examination of a statute, rule' or order of a- tribunal for CONSISTENCY WITH LAND USE PLAN exact compliance with, or adherence to, a standard or norm. It is the antithesis of a deferential review. The tests for consistency of a development project with a land use plan have been, until recently, conflicting' Analogously where a zoning action is challenged as or imprecise primarily because the word consistency violative of the comprehensive land use plan the burden lacked definition. n4 In 1985 the legislature added a of proof [ * *8] is on the one seeking a' change 'to show by definition of consistency at section 163.3194(3)(x), competent and substantial evidence that the proposed Florida Statutes (1985): development conforms' strictly to the comprehensive plan and its elements. See Fasano v. Board of County Commis, 264 Or. 574, 507 P.2d 23 (1973)(en banc). See A development order or land development regulation also Comment, Burden [ *633] of Proof in Land Use shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan if the Regulations: A Unified Approach and Application to land uses, densities or intensities, and other aspects of Florida, 8 Fla.St. U.L. Rev. 499 (1980) (the proof of development permitted by such order or regulation are conformity of the zoning action to the land use plan must compatible with and further the objectives, policies, land be discernible to a reviewing court on a verbatim record). uses, and densities or intensities in the comprehensive Where the record is silent, or the evidence shows Plan and if it meets all other criteria enumerated by the nonconformity with the plan, e.g., that a proposed project local government. constitutes a greater intensity of use, Baker v. Milwaukie; Mafyland- National Capital Park & Planning Comm'n v. Mayor & Council of Rockville, a lesser intensity of use, The legislation implies, as one writer has noted in a City of Cape Canaveral v. Mosher, 467 So.2d 468 (Fla. thoughtful examination of the subject, that application of 5th DCA 1985), a different and incompatible character of a fairly debatable, or for that matter any other deferential use, Alachua County v. Eagle's Nest Farms, Inc., 473 or discretionary standard, is not the correct standard of So.2d 257 (Fla. I st DCA 1985), or a failure to comply review of an administrative determination that a with the plan's mandatory procedures, Hillsborough development ' order is consistent with the local County v. Putney, 495 So.2d 224 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986), comprehensive plan. McPherson, Cumulative Zoning and the requested rezoning will be denied as [ * *9] the Developing Law of ` Consistency with Local inconsistent with the comprehensive plan. Comprehensive [ * *11] Plans, 61 Fla. B.J. 71 (1987). In Sengra Corp. v.' Metropolitan Dade County, 476 So.2d 298 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), we held that a grant of n4 Compare City of Cape Canaveral v. zoning for a use not consistent with the comprehensive Mosher (change of zoning from medium density land use was invalid, implicitly rejecting the notion that residential district to single family homes not t Page 4 519 So. 2d 629, *; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9281, * *; 12 Fla. L. Weekly1728 consistent with plan, therefore invalid) with City conditions change in rapid, and uncontrolled fashion in of Jacksonville v. Grubbs , (use of land more Dade County, increasing the need for costly public limited than the future use contemplated by the services and facilities, due to loose enforcement of the comprehensive plan is not inconsistent with the land use planning scheme. We briefly examine the three plan). Both cases agree, however, that a use more elements of the Land Use Plan in light of the arguments. intense than proposed by the comprehensive, plan is subject to strict scrutiny, n5 McPherson urges adoption of Judge; Cowart's views as expressed in Mosher that all development orders challenged as being Writing a concurring opinion in City of Cape , inconsistent with the local comprehensive plan Canaveral v. Mosher, 467 So.2d 468 (Fla. 5th DCA should be judicially scrutinized. 1985), Judge Cowart gave the term consistency a working definition which squares with the statute: The word "consistent" implies the idea or existence of The Land Use Plan consists of a color -coded map some -type or form of model, standard, guideline, point, which separates uses of all county lands into roughly mark or measure as a norm and a comparison of items or thirteen categories including residential (six densities), actions against that norm. Consistency is the industrial and office, agricultural, and parks and fundamental - relation between the norm and the ' recreation. Textual material on the reverse side of the compared item. If the compared item is in accordance map ;,constitutes the second element of the plan. with, or in agreement [ * *12] with, or within the Neighborhood and functional studies [ * *14] and plans, parameters specified, or exemplified, by [ *6341 the as adopted pursuant to ordinance, make up the third norm, it is "consistent" with it but if the compared item element of the comprehensive plan. deviates or departs in any direction or degree from the The pertinent textual material provides: parameters of the norm, the compared item or action is not "consistent" with the norm. The residential designations [on the map] only 'indicate the overall maximum residential density for an area'. Mosher, 467 S6.2d at 471. Non- residential uses that are permitted in these areas are not shown. Decisions by the County relative to when, Further, in reasoning which we adopt, he wrote: where and how these areas are to be developed with respect to non - residential uses will'be guided through the A comprehensive land use plan legislatively sets a use of the ' policies and written' guidelines of the zoning norm for each zone. Under Section 163.3194(1), Comprehensive Development Master Plan. The Fla. Stat., after adoption of such a plan, zoning changes application of these policies and guidelines for planning should be made only when existing zoning is ••. of_ nonresidential permitted use is most appropriate inconsistent with the plan; otherwise, the plan should be and beneficial at the neighborhood level. legislatively amended as to the area of the entire zone or as to the uses permitted within'`the entire zone. This is ... the only way to (1) regulate and maintain land use by added. See note 2' for add (Emphasis ) itional land use map zones; (2) make individual zoning changes, which are detail now required by statute. essentially executive action, conform to a legislated plan; Dade County argues that the plan's textual language' and (3) avoid arbitrary "spot zoning" change that permits states a general policy which it is not bound to follow. the use of individual parcels to depart from a plan. We agree with respondents that if that is ,'the case then there are no standards or parameters to guide , when, where,` what kind and how much commercial use will be Mosher, 467 So.2d at 471. ermitted m a Tanned residential p p zones, leaving the Dade County is critical of Mosher and its zoning authority free [ * *15] to, approve, ad hoc, requirement for strict adherence to the land use plan, n5 commercial zoning in a residential zone subject only to a contending [ * *13] that it would deprive local deferential court review. We have ',previously rejected government of the flexibility needed to respond' to that philosophy: rapidly changing conditions in Dade County. In response the opponents,' neighboring landowners, contend that Page 5 519 So. 2d 629, *;1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9281, * *; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1728 The law of Florida is committed to the doctrine of the that the plan is incomplete or internally inconsistent, or requirement that zoning ordinances ... must be predicated that the plan, in its application, would constitute a taking upon legislative standards which can be applied to all of private property without due process or fair cases, rather than to the theory of granting an compensation. Even where there is some basis for administrative board or even a legislative body the power consideration by the court pursuant to section 163.3194, to arbitrarily decide each case entirely within the its actions must be consistent with the overall purpose discretion of the members of the administrative board or and intent of the Act as expressed in section 163.3161, legislative body. n6 Section 163.3194(4)(a) provides: City of Homestead v. Schild, 227 So.2d 540, 543 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969). A court, in reviewing local governmental action [ *635] -A Comprehensive Land Use Plan is not a ... under this act, may consider, among other "vest- pocket tool," Baker v. City of Milwaukie, for things, the reasonableness of the comprehensive making individual zoning changes based on political plan, or element or elements thereof, relating to vagary; see Haar & Kayden, Zoning Laws Reflect Our the issue justiciably raised or the appropriateness Values and Priorities, N.Y. Times, Nov. 24, 1986, at 17, and completeness of the comprehensive plan, or col. 1, noted in Southwest Ranches. Instead, it is a broad element or elements thereof, in relation to the statement of a legislative objective "to protect human, governmental action'... under consideration. The environmental, social, and economic resources; and to court ' may consider the relationship of the maintain, through orderly growth and development, the comprehensive plan, or element or elements character and stability of present and future [ * *16] thereof, to the governmental action taken ... but land use and development in this state." § 163.3161(7), private property shall not be taken without due Fla. Stat. (1985) (emphasis added). See 1979 Att'y Gen. process of law and the payment of just Op. sFla. 079 -88 (Sept. 28, 1979). compensation. Further, a neighborhood study, when adopted by ordinance, becomes a law and an integral element of the [* *1ST land use plan. To accept Dade' County's argument, that it - CONCLUSION is not bound by the neighborhood study element of the plan, would render ` useless � the costly and time- Whether' a proposed' development project is consuming processes of formulating.: a comprehensive consistent with a local comprehensive land use plan and plan, ; and 'adopting neighborhood area studies. all of its elements is tested on review by a standard of Uselessness will not be attributed to legislative acts. strict scrutiny; the burden is on the applicant for rezoning Allied Fidelity Ins. Co. v. State, 415 So.2d 109 (Fla. 3d to show by competent and substantial evidence that the DCA 1982). Finally, and significantly, the neighborhood requested rezoning conforms to the legislative plan. study ` once adopted by ordinance is no , longer an A neighborhood area study is a critical element of expression of general policy. The study becomes a Dade County's land use plan; without it there are no permanent law of local government which continues in legislative standards to guide where, when, what kind' force until repealed. § 166.04](1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1985). and the amount of nonresidential uses will be allowed in We know of no rule and petitioners have offered none, a residential zone. The requested rezoning for a non- which allows_ government, acting in its executive residential use is on a`site within a residential zone which capacity, to disregard its own laws. is the subject of a neighborhood area study. That study, Section 163.3194(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1985), n6 now codified at section 2- 116.7, Dade County Code, as relied upon by the petitioners in support of the argument the West Dade Ranch Study Area, limits non - residential that the plan is a flexible instrument, does not compel development in the zone to ranchlands, nurseries and [ * *17] a different result. We read' the provision, in croplands. context, as a recognition of the court's inherent power to Because the applicants were unable to show that take into account fundamental fairness questions as may their proposed commercial [ *636] project' was arise from a strict application of the plan- -not as a license consistent with each element of the land use plan and to second -guess the legislative body where there is furthered its objectives, the circuit court was eminently simply, the to- be- expected collision of the plan with correct in voiding the rezoning. private interests. The:; reflects' no contention or showing below that the plan is totally unreasonable as applied to the development involved in the litigation, or Page 6 519 So. 2d 629, *; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9281, * *; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1728 In light of our determination on the land use plan question. issue- [ * *19] we need not reach the separate zoning Certiorari denied. r d., LEXSEE 461 So. 2d 160 CITY OF JACKSONVILLE BEACH, Appellant, v. AARON C. GRUBBS, Appellee No. AW -408 Court of Appeals of Florida, First District 461 So. 2d 160; 1984 Fla. App. LEMS 16399; 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2516 December 3, 198'4 SUBSEQUENT HISTORY: beach, U.S. Highway A -1 -A runs north' and south. The [ * *1] first block west of the highway is zoned for commercial Rehearing Denied January 9, 1985. uses. The next block west, in which appellee's property is located, is zoned partially for multi- family [ * *2] residential uses and partially for single family residential.,' PRIOR HISTORY: The block is divided into twelve lots, six facing north Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. John and six to the south. The four most easterly lots are S. Cox, Judge. zoned R -3. The remainder' of the block is zoned R -lA and that zoning continues westerly for several blocks. This "step -down zoning" has been in effect along A-1--A COUNSEL:' in the area of appellee's property since 1962; appellee Lamar Winegeart, III, of Arnold, Stratford & Booth, purchased his lots in 1975 or, 1976. Three of the four lots Jacksonville, for Appellant. zoned R -3 in appellee's block contain 4 -unit apartments, Tyrie A. Boyer, of Boyer, Tanzler & Boyer, and the remainder of the block is vacant. A map is Jacksonville, and Gelman & Koegler, Jacksonville, for appended to our opinion for clarification. Appellee. Pursuant to the Local Government Comprehensive Planning Act of 1975, Fla. Stat. § § 163.3161 -.3211 JUDGES: (1983), the City of Jacksonville Beach has adopted a Barfield, J. Joanos and Wigginton, 7J., concur. comprehensive plan lan which includes a Land Use Plan for the year 2000. The plan proposes multi - family uses from OPIlVIONBYc Fourth' Street west to Ninth Street, which would include BARFIELD appellee's property. At the time of the trial' was a proposed zoning OPINION: change to RS -3 (single family and duplexes) for the area that includes the appellee's property.' This proposal was [ *161] Appellee owns seven vacant lots in the City scheduled for public hearing' and had not been acted on of Jacksonville Beach. In early 1983, he sought to have by the City Council at the [ * *3] time of the'irial, and ahem rezoned from R -lA (single family residential) to R- this court has not been advised of any action taken by the 2 (which allows duplexes). ' When the City Council city which would render this appeal moot. denied his request, appellee sought and obtained injunctive relief in the circuit court. We agree with the Both parties presented expert testimony regarding city that the trial court based its ruling' on considerations the current zoning and the city's refusal to grant the which are legally insufficient to overturn the zoning rezoning request. Essentially, the experts' held similar authority's discretionary decision, and we therefore opinions: they testified that zoning boundaries in mid- reverse. block are a fairly common practice but ` that placing boundaries at the street is preferable; that denial of the The eastern boundary of Jacksonville -Beach is, rezoning request, while not arbitrary and capricious, naturally, the Atlantic Ocean. Three blocks west of the precluded multi- family uses which would be more W�1:"sxk'.>!r, wr '.W w'�«rw.. v i. TTV sNr`?"mT.— "fit'- '-°C:? a•i , .. u,° ., , .,. .. T .>.r-r.„ . � . Page 3 461 So. 2d 160, *; 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16399, * *; 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2516 and it is therefore appropriate to conform zoning with Use Regulation: A Unified Approach and planning. Application to Florida, 8 Fla. St. U.L. Rev. 499 (1980). f * *S] Marracci v. City of Scappoose, 26 Ore. App:' 131, 1* *91 133 -34, 552 P.2d 552, 553 (1976) (emphasis in original). Finally; the trial court's reliance on the proposed Although the plan here at issue does contain a rough new comprehensive zoning ordinance is illogical. The timetable, we do not find that fact makes the Marracci "if and when" of passage of the ordinance is too court's reasoning inapplicable to the facts before us; n(3) _ uncertain to support the judgment. Moreover, _appellee will have the relief he seeks if the ordinance passes; if it n(1) Fla. Stat. § 163.3194(1) provides in fails, it provides no rationale for the ruling: pertinent part: In summary, we believe that the zoning authority's After a comprehensive plan or element or decision should have been reviewed under the traditional portion thereof has been adopted in conformity "fairly debatable" standard' of review and that neither the with this act, all development undertaken by, and comprehensive plan nor the proposed zoning ordinance all actions taken in regard to development orders supported reversal below. The trial court's ruling was by, governmental agencies : in regard to land incorrect because _ the city produced evidence that its covered by such plan or element shall be decision was related to the health, safety, welfare and consistent with such plan or element as adopted. morals of the community; and there was no competent' evidence that plaintiff was deprived of reasonable beneficial use of the property. To the contrary, experts "Development order" is defined in § 163.3164(5) agreed that the current zoning diminished the value of to include "any order ... denying... a development the property slightly, if at all. The trial court's finding "highest permit." Further, "development permit" includes regarding and best" use is, of course, irrelevant "rezoning" under § 163.3164(6). to its review of a zoning decision. Likewise, expert opinions that the zoning boundary would have been n(2) Under the Oregon scheme, zoning better placed elsewhere are not grounds for either the ordinances must "carry out" the comprehensive 1* *101 trial or appellate court to substitute its judgment plan. See Fasano v. Board of County for that of the zoning authority. Commissioners, 264 Or. 574, 582, 307 P.2d 23, Accordingly, the judgment is REVERSED and 27 (1973). REMANDED to the trial court with instructions to n(3) An altogether different result occurs if a reinstate the order of the City Council denying appellee's zoning authority approves a use more intensive application for rezoning. than that proposed by the plan. Such a decision JOANOS and WIGGINTON, 7J., CONCUR. should be subject to strict scrutiny. See Fasano, supra note 2; Comment, Burden of Proof in Land f-1641 [SEE APPENDIX IN ORIGINAL] .>.r-r.„ . LEXSEE 467 So. 2d 468 CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, Appellant, v. CUBERTA MOSHER, Appellee No. 83 -1728 ; Court of Appeals of Florida, Fifth District 467 So. 2d 468; 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13536; 10 Fla. L. Weekly 996' April 18, 1985 PRIOR HISTORY: community. The [ * *2] city answered and admitted all [ * *1} the operative facts of the complaint, denying only that Mosher was entitled to relief. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Mosher moved for summary judgment on the above Edward M. Jackson, Judge. grounds and the trial court granted her motion and ruled that the amendment is void. We affirm. COUNSEL: Our supreme 'court, in rejecting any ' estoppel Joseph W. Scott, Cape Canaveral, for Appellant. argument to 'enforcement of a zoning amendment, has Jere E. Lober, and Lewis R. Pearce, Merritt Island, said that "All one who plans to use his property in for Appellee. accordance with existing zoning regulations is entitled to assume is that such regulations will not be altered to his detriment unless the change bears a substantial relation JUDGES: to the health, morals, welfare, or safety of the public." Upchurch, F., Jr., J. Dauksch, J., concurs. Cowart, City of Mimni Beach v. 8701 Collins Ave.; Inc., 77' So. 2d , J., concurring specially with opinion. 428, 430 (Fla. 1954). OPINIONBY: Here the following facts were established by UPCHURCH, JR. admission of the city in its answer: 1. The re -zoned strip, including Mosher's land, was OPINION: carved out of an existing R -3 zone: [ *469] The City of Cape Canaveral appeals from a 2. Mosher did not receive notice as required by the summary final judgment declaring an amendment to its zoning ordinance in effect at he time. zoning ordinance void as applied to Mosher's property. 3. The new classification of Mosher's land was not Briefly stated, Mosher sought a declaratory in accordance with the comprehensive land use plan judgment holding that the city's action in amending its adopted by the city under the provisions of Chapter 163, zoning ordinance to change the zoning of land along Florida Statutes. Long Point Road, which includes her property, from R -3 4. There was no [ * *3] relation whatever between (a medium density residential district) to R -1 (single the present '(re- zoned) classification and the general family 'residential) in ' 1983 was invalid. The initial welfare of the community. zoning , classification of R -3 complied with the comprehensive land use plan adopted by the city in 1980. Mosher alleged, inter alia, that she was not given written notice of the proposed change as required, that the There were no facts pleaded or demonstrated by amendment was not in accord with the comprehensive - affidavit or otherwise that the change bore a substantial plan, and that no relationship existed between the re- relation to the health, morals, welfare, or 'safety of the zoning of the property and the general welfare of the public. The court was correct in concluding there was no Page 2 467 So. 2d468, * 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13536 * *; 10 Fla. L. Weekly 996 genuine issue of material fact and in granting summary final judgment. nl 1. '[finds no genuine issue of fact] 2. [finds plaintiff is owner] 3. [finds zoning prior to change to be R -3 which nl We take issue with Judge Cowart's zoning was consistent with the city's statement in his concurrence that the majority comprehensive land use plan] opinion is based on a point of law different than "4. That insofar as it pertains to Plaintiffs said that on which the trial court's decision was based. real property, the zoning ordinance adopted by The trial court correctly found first that there was the Defendant on February 15, 1983, attempting no genuine issue of fact (see footnote two of the to change -the zoning classification of Plaintiffs concurring opinion). At that point, appellee was said real property from R3 to R -1 was entitled to judgment as a matter of , law. inconsistent with the land use element of said Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510(c). Any further findings of comprehensive plan of the Defendant and said fact or conclusion: s of law by the trial court then zoning change on February 15, 1983, was not an became superfluous and any additional amendment to the land use element of said , discussions or analysis by this court became comprehensive plan adopted in accordance with unnecessary and meaningless:` the requirements pertaining` to same set forth in the 'Local Government Comprehensive Planning Act of 1975' (Section 163.3161, et seq., Florida Statutes). AFFIRMED. [ * *4] 5. That said zoning change relating to the * Plaintiffs property from R -3 to R -1 is invalid, [ 470] DAUKSCH J., concurs. and COWART, J., concurring specially with opinion. Plaintiffs property is and remains zoned R -3." [ **5l CONCURBY: COWART As presented by the parties before the trial court and on appeal this case involves a question of whether the CONCUR: rezoning of a parcel of land was consistent with the comprehensive land use (zoning) 'plan of the zoning COWART, J., concurring specially: authority. As I understand the majority opinion I fully concur As is necessary for valid zoning and as required by in it. nl I write specially because an appellate 'court statute n3 appellant city adopted a comprehensive land should' review and uphold a -trial court decision on the use (zoning) plan designating a large zone, including point of law on which that decision was made unless that appellee's land, for medium density residential use. basis is erroneous but the decision can be upheld on Later,, the city rezoned some land, including appellee- some other point of law. In this case the trial court based owner's land, from R -3, a medium density residential its decision on a point of law different from that on classification permitting moderate multiple family-rental which the majority opinion is based and the trial court is use, to R -1,' a more restrictive classification permitting correct as to the point of law on which it based its less intensive use and allowing only single dwelling decision n2 and should' be affirmed on that basis. units. The owner sought relief from the rezoning by declaratory judgment and after a, hearing on the owner's motion for a summary judgment, the trial court held the nl I understand the majority opinion to apply rezoning was inconsistent with the city's comprehensive a principle of law to the effect that a, zoning zoning plan and voided it. The city appeals and argues change initiated by a zoning authority should be that any zoning that is more- restrictive or less intensive voided at the behest of the landowner unless' the than that provided by a comprehensive plan is zoning authority establishes, as a matter of fact "consistent" with that plan. n4 and to the satisfaction of the trial court, that the change', bears a substantial relationship to the health, morals, welfare or safety of the public. n3 See, § 163.3184, Fla. Stat. (1983). [ * *6] n2 The relevant portions of the appealed n4 The city's argument is based upon an summary final judgment are as follows: early zoning concept that the purpose of zoning was to protect the property in a zone from less Page 3 467 So. 2d 468, * 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13536, ** 10 Fla. L. Weekly 996 desirable uses than that specifically permitted. _ parameters ,specified, or exemplified, by the norm, it is This concept is called the "cumulative" or "consistent" with it but if the compared item deviates or "pyramid" style of zoning. Under this concept departs in any direction or degree from the parameters of any use considered by the zoning authority to be the norm, the compared item or action is not "consistent" more desirable (i.e. more restrictive or less with the norm. intensive use), was considered to be "compatible" and "consistent" with any less desirable (less restrictive or more dense) zoning and was n5 See 1 E. Yokley, Zoning Law and permitted in any area zoned for any less desirable Practice § 5 -2 (4th Ed. 1978). use. This idea is now generally considered poor planning and zoning and the better practice is to restrict each different use and each different intensity to its own zone although many zoning A comprehensive land use plan legislatively sets a ordinances still permit "pyramiding" to some zoning norm for each zone. [ * *8] Under "Section extent. See 1 Rathkoff, The Law of Zoning and 163.3194(1)' F1a.Stat., after adoption of = such a plan, Planning, § 1.01 (4th Ed. 1984). One case, zoning changes, should be made only when existing Marracci v. City of Scappoose, 26 Ore. App. 131, zoning is inconsistent with the plan and then only in the 552 P.2d 552 (Or.App. 1976) agrees with the direction of making the zoning more consistent ;with the city's argument and that case should not be plan; otherwise the plan should be legislatively amended followed. as to the area of the entire zone or as to the uses permitted within the entire zone. This is what '.the trial court held and this is the only way to (1) regulate and maintain land use by zones; (2) make individual zoning [ *471] Section 163.3194(1),; Florida Statutes, changes, which are essentially executive action, conform defines the [ * *7] legal status of a comprehensive zoning to a legislated plan and (3) avoid arbitrary "spot,zoning" plan to be such that after its adoption all land change that permits the use of individual parcels to development regulations enacted or amended must be depart from a'plan. consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan. This requirement is itself consistent with the theory, purpose. Because of the city's rezoning, of the owner's land to and validity of zoning. n5 The word "consistent" implies amore restrictive classification pernutting; less intensive the idea or existence- of some type or form of model, use than the use provided for in its', comprehensive land standard, guideline, point, mark or measure as a norm use (zoning) plan was inconsistent with its plan and and a comparison of items or` actions 'against that norm. contrary to the dictates of Section 163.3194(1),, Florida Consistency is the fundamental relation between the Statutes, the trial court was correct in voiding the norm and the compared item. If the compared item is in rezoning and should be affirmed on that basis. accordance with, or in agreement with, or within the >n Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP A PARTNERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS 200 SOUTH BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, SUITE 2500 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 -5340 TELEPHONE: (305) 374 -7580 - FAx: 1,(305) 374 -7593 e -mail: info @bllzin.com- WWW.BILZIN.COM Jerry B. Proctor, Esq. Direct Dial: (305) 350 -2361 Direct Facsimile: (305) 351 -2250 E -mail: )proctor @bilzin.com July 25, 2003 Via Fax, E -Mail, and Hand Delivery Earl Gallop, Esq. City Attorney, City of South Miami 3225 Aviation Avenue Suite 3 01 Miarni, Florida 33133 Re: Applicants: Pedro and Gina Infante Address: 5243 SW 63 Court, City of South Miami City of South Miami Conunission Hearing Date — July 29, 2003 Dear Mr. Gallop: Please accept this letter as an. attempt to further address the "consistency" issues raised in our Memorandum of Law dated July 22, 2003, regarding the above - xnentioned hearing before the Mayor and Commission of the City of South Miami on July 29, 2003. In preparation for the public hearing on July 29, 2003,1 respectfully ask that your office consider the following: 1 Policy 1.1.1 of the Goals, Objectives and Policies (GOPs) of the Future Land Use Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan clearly states that "the Land Use Map Policies mid Categories are hereby incorporated by reference in this Policy." Land use categories in the City are established through. the "New Future Land Use Map ", a copy of which is attached. The "Map Legend" and corresponding descriptions establish the laird use category for my,clients' property as "Single- Fanuly Residential 5756941192541 # 635533 v 1 7/25103 4:27 PM .�..,p r �1�. � ,.t^k'".0 �, rs., � ., *� ,^ram: � „•�:zr., July 25,;2003 Page 2 (Two- Story) ". Pursuant to Policy 1.1.1 of the GOPs, the Land Use Map Policies and Categories in Element 1 of the Comprehensive Pfau (entitled "Future Land Use Categories ") on pages 21 -25, inclusive, are incorporated by reference into the GOPs of ' the City. As you Imow, these descriptive elements within the City's Comprehensive Plan establish that: (a) New parcels should have a niiniinum area of 10,000 square feet; (b) In areas where existing platting is characterized by parcels larger than 10,000 square feet, zoning regulations should be consistent with such parcel sizes provided that minimum parcel sizes need not exceed one acre; and (c) Zoning regulations shall not require any special hearing or approval process for lots that meet the requirements set forth herein. In the instant case, our clients propose to establish parcels greater than 15,000 square feet in size, iii full compliance with the underlying RS -2 zoning regulations in this area of the City. Ordinance No. 9 -02 -1777 establishes a special standard of review for lot sizes in Waiver of Plat applications that is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Land Development Code. 2. Section 9f- 5.005(g), Florida Administrative Code, provides that "a local government ii include, as part of itss adopted plan, documents adopted. by reference but not incorporated verbatim into the plan ". Here, the City's description of "Future Land Use Categories ", at pages 21 -25, inclusive, are not merely referenced, but are specifically incorporated by reference in the GOPs of the City. 3. The "New Future Land Use Map" and supporting "Future Lm-id Use Categories" in the Comprehensive Plan comply with the mandate of Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes, conirnonly lmown as the "Growth Management Act ". In Section 163.3177(6)(a) of the Growth Management Act, maiiicipal `comprehensive plans must I provide the following element; F (a) A future laud use plan element designating proposed future general' j distribution, location, and extent of the uses of land for residential uses, ' commercial uses, industry, agriculture, recreation, conservation, education, 1 public buildings and grounds, other public facilities, and other categories of ';„,....,�,�.°= r,� -°*,. ,. .'?- ,, z,.. ..n ,zr .:tr;^A'rr. ..n•'e ,.'.; .s.. :°E'; ,- s= > .,,.. ;!s. .. ;. , �.; s�'r + 'SSA, °,°'"'�.s�::'_. °.'-R:.:,,n� Y° .;� =.rr gaa��.�,..-�n 'f'�m'f�.i '1.<.;'.:cS _. �,._.�7.%" { July 25, 2003 Page 3 the public and private uses of land. Each future land use category must be defined in tends of uses included, and must include standards to be followed in the control and distribution of population densities and building and structure intensities. ` The proposed distribution, location, and extent of the various categories of land use shall be shown on aland use map or neap series which shall be supplemented by goals, policies, and measurable objectives. Here, the "New Future Land Use Map" describes the various uses of land permitted in the City and assigns these uses to each property within the City through the color coded map. The "Future Land Use Categories" textual language in the Comprehensive Plan provides the required supplementation by goals, policies, and measurable objectives. The "New Future Land Use Map" alone provides a list of land use " categories and applications to each property within the City, but does not provide descriptions of the meaning of the various land use categories, and no measurable objectives as to their implementation. 4. We believe that any possible interpretation that the Descriptive Elements of the South Miami Comprehensive Plan addressing "Future Land Use Categories" are discretionary and nonbinding would be in violation of Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes, Rule 9J -5 of the Florida Administrative Code, and the applicable case law within tlris district. In Machado v. Musgrove, 519 So. 2d 629 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), Dade County argued that the textual language within the County's land use plan contained only general policies which the County was riot bowed to follow. Tla.e Third District Court of Appeal However, disagreed. Specifically, the court noted: [Although] Dade County argues that the plan's textual language states a general' policy which it is not bound to follow . [we find] that if that is the case, their there` are no standards or parameters to guide when, where, what kind and how much [of a particular land use] will be permitted in a i planned residential zone, leaving the zoning authority free to approve [or deny], ad hoc, [requests for relief . We have previously rejected that philosophy: The law of Florida is committed to the doctrine of the requirement that the zoning ordinances must be predicated upon legislative standards which can be applied to all cases, rather than to the theory of granting an administrative board or July 25, 2003 Page 4 even a legislative body the power to arbitrarily decide each case entirely within the discretion of the members of the administrative board or legislative body ... Id. at 634. Ultimately, the court field that "we know of no rule and petitioners have offered none, which allows government, acting in its executive capacity, to disregard its own laws." Id. at 635. 5. Without incorporating the descriptive text of the City's Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan does not contain the required measurable objectives that adequately describe the Plan Map Categories as they apply to individual properties witlun the City. It is well established that municipal rules and regulations that lack objective standards to guide Hearing Boards are unconstitutional. See Miami -Dade Counot v. Onwipoint Holdings, Inc., 811 So. 2d 767 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). See also Drexel v. City of Mianii Beach, 64 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 1953). Li addition to the descriptive language in the Comprehensive Plan, the City's regulations contain measurable objectives for each 'zouing category in the Land Development Code. Our clients' compliance with these measurable objectives provides the necessary compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code. Accordingly, any inconsistent lot size criteria is not relevant or supportable by law. I would appreciate the opportunity to discuss these issues with you once you have had a chance to review them. As usual, thank you for your courtesy and cooperation. Very truly yours, Jerry . Proctor JBP:id Encl. cc Eve Boutsis, Esq. (w /eilcl.) Via Fax and Hand Delivery Pedro Infante (w /encl.) Brian Adler, Esq. (w /encl.) William W. Riley, Jr., Esq. (w /encl) ,. .. .fix mgv ' C M" LEGEND lr- j 3 — ❑ Single- Family C- �• C1 I� --1� -` �. •,.; � .I, ��',.� - Residential L H I T S (TIVO- Stoll) Lo 8 Duplex iU �-- i000t�IC o d _�C�C� C Residential (Two - Story) Lm Townhouse Residential (Two- S-tozy) ? Multiple-Family S, , 1 1t�1 r Residential C��UI(Four-Story) Cummomry Tu —lopman Aron � j '! •' j Ilrbnn1011andR.divdnpmen,Amn- Y: — Mixed-Use _ , ? '} :, t _; `� • �� DUI — } f Commercial r r — Residential — 1 • i �• ,. P � � L � ,� � _ - I :� r i � � '� �c�tar- Story f jjjj I '• 1u1 M CoM.alefiCial J 7� , , Retail & Office w (Two - Story) T. D. D. r (4+4- Story) y) r IP Residential Office 1 T. - J q lilD (Two -Stay '." Educational our -Stogy _ ( y) NORTH ® Public a.7zd ' histitational — _ �- ..... ....._ .�. � ._ • .; (Four - Stogy) NEW FUTURE LAND USE AI_ P SOUTH MIAMI °` b Parks and. DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA ` = Open Space • rl= - ':mss rF�r 1 .u.•-,. Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP MEMORANDUM OF LAW RE: South Miami Subdivision Regulations DATE: July 22, 2003 ISSUE May a Florida municipality enact an ordinance amending the standard of review for subdivision approval that conflicts with its comprehensive plan and zoning regulations? BRIEF ANSWER In Florida, land development and subdivision regulations must be consistent with the municipality's comprehensive plan. In addition, subdivision approval in Florida is governed by strict adherence to the comprehensive plan and land development codes that does not permit the exercise of discretion by the local government to establish new or different regulations that significantly alter the permitted intensity of development. DISCUSSION I. The Comprehensive Plan and the "Consistency" Requirement Land development regulations in Florida are comprised of various components - that operate in unison to secure and promote sound community planning. The initial layer or baseline policies of land development regulations in Florida are set forth in Chapter 163, Part II, of the Florida Statutes. These provisions of the statutes, commonly referred to ` as the Growth Management Act, require each local government within the state to adopt and implement a land use comprehensive plan for its jurisdictional territory, which first must be approved by the State of Florida's land 'planning agency and second, must define each property situated within the applicable territory by assigning a land use designation that identifies the uses and development intensity that will be permitted thereon. See Fla. Stat. § 163.3167 (2002). Briefly stated, "local comprehensive land use plans are a statutorily mandated legislative plan to control and direct the use and development of property within a county or municipality." Gardens Country Club v. Palm Beach County, 590 So. 2d 488, 490 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (citing Southwest Ranches Homeowners Assn v. Broward County, 502 So. 2d 931 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)). Pursuant to Section 163.3161 of the Growth Management Act, all development orders, whether in the form of zoning or subdivision approval, must be "consistent" with the local government's comprehensive development plan. Courts examining the consistency element of \75523 \18515\ #633712 v 4 7/24/03 2:09 PM Memorandum of Law July 22, 2003 Page 2 development approval have often started their analysis by noting that the comprehensive plan of a local municipality is akin to a "constitution for all future development within the [applicable] governmental boundary." Id. (citing O'Loane v. O'Rourke, 231 Cal.App.2d 774, 782 (1965)). It has been said that development orders which are "not in accordance with a comprehensive plan [are] ultra vices" and void as a matter of law. Id.; see also Haar, ` In Accordance with a Comprehensive Plan, 68 Harv. L. Rev. at 11156. When applying these principles to the facts presented in the instant case, the City of South Miami must review the proposal to subdivide the subject property for consistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan. In pertinent part, the Future Land Use Element of the South Miami Comprehensive Plan provides the following: "New parcels should have a minimum area of 10,000 square feet . In areas where existing platting is characterized by parcels larger than 10,000 square feet, zoning regulations should be consistent with such parcel sizes provided that minimum parcel sizes need not exceed one acre... Zoning regulations shall not require any special hearing or approval process for lots that meet the requirements set forth herein." See Element I, Pages 21 -22, City of South Miami Comprehensive Plan. Consequently, the City's_ Comprehensive Plan, which is the City's land use constitution; guarantees that applicants seeking to subdivide property may do so as a matter of legal right where the proposed subdivision is consistent with the above -cited policies. In the instant case, the proposed subdivision is consistent with the requirements of the City's Comprehensive Plan and therefore, pursuant to applicable law, must be approved. The RS - 2 (Semi Estate Residential) zoning on the property establishes a minimum lot frontage of 100 feet and a minimum lot size of 15,000 square feet. The application complies with (in fact, exceeds) these minimum requirements. Accordingly, the application to subdivide the property is fully consistent with the applicable provisions of the City of South Miami Comprehensive Plan and, as such, is permissible as a matter of right. IL The City of South Miami's Land Development Regulations The second layer of development approval requires that the proposed land use be in accordance with the standards and regulations contained within the local government's zoning or land development regulations. Where the comprehensive plan has been 'described as the local government land use constitution, courts have stated that zoning and other forms of land development regulations, like those associated with the subdivision of property, are "the means by which the comprehensive plan is implemented." Id. (citing Jacksonville Beach v. Grubbs, 461 So. 2d 160 (Fla. lst DCA 19$4)). As noted above, the subject property is situated within the City of South Miami's RS -2 (Semi Estate Residential) district. According to Section 20 -3.5 of the City's Land Development \75523 \18515 \# 633712 v 2 7/24/032:09 PM Memorandum of Law July 22, 2003 Page 3 Regulations, lands located within the RS -2 district which contain a minimum of 15,000 square feet of net land area and at least 100 feet of street frontage are expressly established as permitted sites for the development of single- family homes. Accordingly, pursuant to the development rights detailed in the City's Code, the subject property, under the proposed subdivision, fully complies with all applicable zoning requirements necessary to develop two single- family homes. As a result, the application complies with not only the "over- arching" requirements in the Comprehensive Plan, but the specific zoning regulations for the property. ` Accordingly, pursuant to the Comprehensive Plan, no special hearing or approval process may be required to establish these two parcels of land. 11T. Ordinance No. 9 -02 -1777 Despite the above regulations and applicable law, however, on September 17, 2002, the City of South Miami City Commission passed and adopted Ordinance No. 9 -02 -1777, which implemented land development standards that significantly amended those discussed above. Specifically, Ordinance 9 -02 -1777, amending Section 20 -42 of the City's "Land Subdivision Regulations ", provides that all future subdivisions approved through the grant of a waiver -of -plat have parcels "equal to or larger than" the majority of existing parcels located within the surrounding area. The addition of this language creates a form of ad hoc amendment to the intensities of development outlined in the Comprehensive Plan that renders the standards in the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code meaningless. The profound differences underlying the standards for subdivision approval contained within the City's Comprehensive Plan, its ;zoning code, and Ordinance No. 9 -02 -1777 are best understood when viewed through a line -by -line comparison. First, the Comprehensive Plan specifically states that all newly created parcels of land be at least 10,000 square feet in size and requires that zoning laws maintain the character of existing areas by establishing minimum buildable lot sizes which are 10,000 square feet or larger, depending upon the area of land that is under consideration. Ordinance No. 9 -02 -1777 ignores this language and, instead, states that all newly created parcels must be equal to or larger than the majority of existing; parcels located within the surrounding, area. Additionally, the Comprehensive Plan provides that, for newly proposed parcels that meet the 10,000 square feet lot area size and also satisfy the minimum lot area sizes set forth within the applicable zoning regulations (which in this case is 15,000 square feet), no special hearing or approval process shall be required. Nevertheless, Ordinance No. 9- 02 -1777 requires that all applications seeking a waiver -of -plat comply with a distinctly different standard that is not consistent with either the Comprehensive Plan or the Zoning Code of the City. Courts throughout the 'State of Florida have uniformly held' that where, as in the instant case, a newly adopted zoning or other land development regulation is introduced by a local government that conflicts with the provisions of the area's comprehensive plan, the comprehensive plan —as the land use constitution for that municipality or County —acts as the applicable law and governs development applications notwithstanding the existence of conflicting ordinances. For example,' in City of Cape Canaveral v. Mosher, 467 So. 2d 468 (Fla. \75523 \18515\ # 633712 v 2 7/24/03 2:09 PM ,� .°mss .� .� >. _.� :aw;�a„ � •a� €����.:� f .r Memorandum of Law July 22, 2003 Page 4 5th DCA" 1985), the Fifth District Court of Appeal's was presented with an appeal challenging an action to rezone property from one classification to another that, allegedly, violated Cape Canaveral's Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the facts of that case dealt with a property owner who acquired land designated for medium density residential development according to the applicable provisions of the City's Comprehensive Plan and that was also, accordingly, classified as medium density residential on the City's zoning atlas. After the owner purchased the subject property, however, the City proceeded to rezone the land for single - family residential use, a zoning classification that significantly reduced the development density of the property despite its medium density comprehensive plan designation. On appeal, the property owner argued that the new zoning classification was void and of no effect as a violation of the Growth Management Act. In his concurring opinion, Judge Cowart focused upon the consistency requirement contained in Chapter, 163 of the Florida Statutes and identified its effect upon other land development regulations as follows: Section 163.3194(1), Florida Statutes, defines the legal status of a comprehensive zoning plan to be such that after its adoption all land development regulations enacted or amended must be consistent with the adopted'' comprehensive plan. This requirement is itself consistent with the theory, purpose and validity of zoning. The word "consistent" implies the idea or existence of some type or form of model, standard, guideline, point, mark or measure as a norm and a comparison of items or actions' against that norm. Consistency is the fundamental relation between the norm and the compared item. If the compared item is in accordance with, or in agreement with, or within the parameters specified, or exemplified, by the norm, it is "consistent" with it but if the compared item deviates or departs in any direction or degree from the parameters of the norm, the compared item or action is not "consistent" with the norm. Id. at 471. When applying this definition to the facts presented before the court, Judge Cowart held that the decision to rezone the subject property to a classification that restricted its development density to a level less than that which was permitted by the Cape Canaveral Comprehensive Plan was "contrary to the dictates of [Florida Statutes] > Section 163.3194(1) and, thus, void as a matter of law. In a later decision, the Third District Court of Appeal adopted Judge Cowart's analysis in Machado v Musgrove, 519 So. 2d 629 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). In that case, the Third District Court explained that where "a proposed project constitutes a greater intensity of use [than that which is permitted by the local comprehensive plan], a lesser intensity of use, a different and incompatible character of use, or a failure to comply with the plan's mandatory procedures, the requested [change] will be denied as inconsistent with the comprehensive plan." 7d. at 633 \75523 \18515\ # 633712 v 2 7/24/03 2:09 PM i Memorandum of Law July 22, 2003 Page 5 (citations omitted). Therefore, the law is clear that the provisions of Ordinance No. 9-02-1777 that are contrary to and serve to offend the pre- existing regulations set forth within the City of South Miami's Comprehensive Plan and Land Development" Code be given no effect. As such, the current application to subdivide the property located at 5243 SW 63 Court must be examined exclusively under the governing provisions set forth in the provisions of the comprehensive plan and zoning code, as cited above. IV The Law Regarding Subdivisions The current application to subdivide the subject property satisfies all of the applicable and valid requirements for such land development within the City of South Miami and, therefore, must be approved by law. It is well- settled in Florida that once a party satisfies State and local requirements for platting real property,' the local government may not deny the proposed application. For example, in Broward County v. Narco Realty, Inc., 359 So. 2d 509 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978), the Fourth District Court of Appeal was presented with a case wherein a property owner with land located in the City of Parkland brought a mandamus action against Broward County seeking to compel the County to approve a plat application deemed to satisfy all the applicable legal' requirements: contained in Chapter 177, Florida Statutes (1975) and the Broward County Plat Act. In defense to the action, attorneys for the County argued that the Board of County Commissioners possessed a wide ;degree of discretion while reviewing plat applications and, even though an application may comply with all of the legal requirements associated with platting land, the County is free to base its determination of approval or denial upon other considerations. See id. As such, the County argued that it could not be compelled to approve a plat application by way of a mandamus proceeding. See id. The Court, however, disagreed. The Narco Realty Court held: All persons similarly situated should be able to obtain plat approval upon meeting uniform standards. Otherwise, the official approval of a plat application would depend upon the whim or caprice of the public body involved. Tokley, in his work,' Law of Subdivisions, [ §§ 52 -53], states: "Thus, while public policy requires municipal control of such development, nevertheless, authority of a town to deny a landowner the right to develop his property by refusing to approve the plat of such development is, by statute, made to rest upon specific standards of a : statute or implementing ordinances. Thereafter, the approval or disapproval of the plat on the basis of controlling standards becomes an administrative act." .... "When the statutes and ordinances have been complied with in making a plat of a subdivision, the active 'approval by a village board has been held to be ministerial, and such act may be enforced by a writ of mandamus." \75523 \18515\ # 633712 v 2 7/24/03 2:09 PM Memorandum of Law July 22, 2003 Page 6 Id. at 510; see also City of Lauderdale Lakes v. Corn, 427 So. 2d 239 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). Similarly, as the Court noted, the legal; treatise of Anderson, American Law of Zoning (2d Edition) § 26.04, (1976) states: "Mandamus to compel plat approval has been successful where the court, applying common -law principles, determined that when a subdivider has complied with all of the standards for plat approval,` such approval is a ministerial act which the court may compel through a writ of mandamus .... Id. Based upon the forgoing authority, the Court held that the County erred in denying plaintiffs' application for plat approval and remanded the case back to the lower tribunal with instructions stating` "the [C]ounty shall approve the plat in question." Id. at 511. Similarly, in Broward County v. G.B. V. International, LTD., 787 So. 2d 838 (Fla. 2001), G.B.V. International (hereinafter the "Applicant ") submitted an application to the City of Coconut Creek, Broward County, seeking plat approval for 30 acres of undeveloped land at a proposed density of 10 units per acre. The comprehensive: plan land use designation for the subject property limited development of the land to 6 units per acre. However, pursuant to certain provisions contained within the text version of the County's comprehensive plan,' the Applicant was permitted to utilize a type of density bonus, known as "flex units ", which would allow for development at the density requested. Specifically, flex units are " a discretionary component built into the [Broward County Land Use Plan] that gives the City the right to shift a certain number of planned dwelling units from one area within the City to another as long as the overall number of units within the City is not increased." Despite this allowance, however, the County Commission voted to approval the plat application at a density level of 6 units, rather than the requested 10 units, per acre. Shortly thereafter; the Applicant appealed. When reviewing the merits of this case, the Florida Supreme Court proceeded to explain the standard of review applicable to actions challenging a local governments decision to partially and fully deny an application` for plat approval. On this issue, the Court stated: A decision granting or denying 'a site plan or plat application is governed by local regulations, which must be uniformly administered. The allocation of burdens expressed in Irvine v. Duval County Planning Commission, 495 So. 2d 167 (Fla. 1986), is applicable to such proceedings:, Once the petitioner met the initial burden of showing that his application met the statutory criteria for granting such [applications], "the burden was upon the Planning Commission to demonstrate, by competent substantial evidence presented at the hearing and made a part of the record, that the [application] requested by petitioner did not meet such standards and was, in fact, adverse to the public interest." \75523 \18515\ # 633712 v Z 7/24/03 2:09 PM a Memorandum of Law July 22, 2003 Page 7 Irvine, 495 So. 2d at 167. [In other words], to deny a plat application, a local government agency must show by competent substantial evidence' that the application ' does not meet the published criteria. Upon reviewing all issues presented in this case, the ,Supreme Court remanded the case to the circuit court with specific instructions, which included the following: "[F]or the County to prevail on remand, the record must contain competent substantial evidence to support the conclusion that [the Applicant] failed to meet the County's published criteria for plat approval . . . [o]therwise, the Commission's decision must be quashed." Here, the applicants are similarly relying upon the text of the City's Comprehensive Plan, which calls for strict adherence to zoning regulations and no special hearings for lots that meet the City's requirements. Based upon, this language and the long- standing state of the law regarding subdivisions, the purpose of the City's review is limited to insuring that the application meets the technical rules of the underlying zoning district, i.e., that the rules of the City are being administered uniformly. CONCLUSION Chapter 177, Florida Statutes, requires all subdivision applications to be approved by the municipal governing body, in this case, the City Commission. However, it is well established that the standards for approval of subdivisions, must be (1) consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, (2) in strict compliance with the Land Development Regulations (Zoning Code), and (3) uniformly administered. This application is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and fully compliant with the Zoning Code. Accordingly, denial of the application cannot be sustained as a matter of law. ' Competent substantial evidence is defined as "such evidence as will establish a substantial basis of fact from which one fact at issue can be reasonably inferred, i.e., such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind would accept as adequate to support a conclusion." Metropolitan Dade County v. Blumenthal, 675 So 2d 598 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (citing DeGroot v. Sheffield, 95 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 1957)). \75523 \18515\ # 633712 v 2 7/24/032:09 PM bbbPA The undersigned supports the application of Pedro and Gina bifante at 5243 SW 63 Court to subdivide their 37,524 square foot property into two single - family residential lots. Signal z aa III Print Name r (0 0 r ci (0 c) / cue. F Address f f F4��� Date f F I; I F F u : r I r r r �k \75694 \19254\ # 634934 v 1 I, 7/22/03 4:11 PM G, iI ii r 4, i G I 4 —p^.^�r �. �' , ^.. ..,?tea.. �+ms3c„",�- °;.rya{. v:- ;:r�-r=. .a°s ..,, :'^°^ear. ...�,f' .�„�,.;�v, x.�.�r^a,�.r, r�"��: *'''�., ,�.. ,:aF�s°°d s�'i�;'�''�.:,t ^ F�+.. ��',,,;: �% '- "�;�'�:.�a♦t,�.'^r�+�";?u.':. i�,L��' }...e�'S'sP.. �!, .. _°r:., The undersigned supports the application of Pedro and Gina Infante at 5243 Ski 63 Court to subdivide their 37,524 square foot property into two single- family residential lots, Q/KI Sna.t o�t� Print Name G 41fo C& vi S� Address ® 3 Date \75694 \19254. # 634934 v 1 7/22/03 4:11 PM The undersigned supports the application of Pero acid Gilia hifante al 5243 SW 63 Court to subdivide their 37,524 square foot pro erty into two single - family residential lots. . Sig gat Prim Name Address Ile Date - 1756941192541 # 634934 u 1 7/22/03 4:11 P1v1 I bbt3k-A / /GG /.GUOO q:44 k'L'UC. 41L na ;rlr rca The undersigned supports the application of Pedro and Gilla Infante at 5243 SW 63 Court to subdivide their 37,524 square foot property into two single - family residential lots. UP A 'na. Iro Print Name Address Date 175694 \19254\ # 634934 v 1 7/22/03 4;11 P1Vt' The undersigiled supports the application of Pedro and Gina. Infante at 5243 SW 63 Court to subdivide their 37,524 square foot property into two single- family residential dots. Signature Pratt Name ST _ 1 Address Date \75694 \19254\ # 634984 v 1 7/22/03 4:11 PM ":�F, � ...:,�•za; ,�„rr�: a�. ?w'. ��.. , ,. - ,�,,:. _ „'i^'�:., Via° �_ �:�';s.�n `'��'�' :'a3' =�, `�`*c't ,"'::� "r� m,.T""�, �c`F,� -�± .�. � „�`"?''-i.. ,� . �^�"°'d' = �i.�s.f;�!�z`� -'” .�. , . i ..�^�:'d`� , i?: ��.. ��,+i°"�"„"�;7�"�`.;�""�+f- e""�";- ��.., =, iN�T "�r��T^i, +"�5a,=':� r ,"�,�y... �.:; t3bbPA, / /ZZ /ZUUO q : zz !'AUC: 414 fi:3.gxiil dls The undersigned supports the application of Pedro and Gina. Infante at 5243 SW 63 Court to subdivide their 37,524 square foot property into two single - family residential lots. Sig nature Print Name Address ! ,2 Date I I \75694 \14254\ # 634934 v 1 7/22/03 4:11 PM The undersigned supports the ap hicalion ofPed.ro and Gi na. Infante at 5243 SW 63 Court to subdivide their 37;524. square foot property into two single -frail residential lots 17ZI c A R Print Name Address Date \75694\1925* 034984 v 1 7/22/03 4:11. P1Vi" bbbI'A iiGG/GVU q;zz FAUC 4-rc raignGray, The undersigned supports the application of Pedro and Gina Infante at 5243 SW 63 Court to subdivide their 37,524 square foot property into two single-family residential lots. Si nat it vxbd 0 -Z Print N Address Date \75694 \19254\ # 634984 v 1 7122/03 4 :11 PM 6� The undersigned supports the application of Pedro and Gina. Infante at 5243 SW 63 Court to subdivide their 37;524 square foot property into 'two single - family residential lots. gnaMure Print Name 00 5U) GV Address Sate \75694 \19254\ # 634934 v 1 7/22/03 4 :'11 PM i The undersigned supports the application of Pedro and Grim Infante at 5243 SW 63 Court to subdivide their 37,524 square foot property into tw singi �y residential lots. sign riyit Name Pw, Address 2 0 Bate 3 t i I \75694 \19254\ # 634934 v 1 I 7122/03 4 :11 PM i ,:a'c""�,t��Fw c7 The undersigned supports die,, application of Pedro and Gies. Infamle at 5243 SCI 63 Court to subdivide their 37,524 square loot property 0110 1AXIO Single-family resid mia,l lots. ° w� V { } i V � $ Si t r PrWI Name ,-S772,2, 335 Address 0 71 4��3 Dale \75694\1925x, #034994 ,j 7/22/03 4:11 PM r �6 The undersigned supports the application of Pedro and Gina Infante at 5243 SST 63 Court to subdivide their 37,524 square foot property into two single -family residential lots. ` gxatux /' 6J cs Priest Name Address Date -- \75694\19254 \# 634934 v1 7/22/03 4:1'1 PM �5 /Z The dic; 3:ppil.1calioll ref p dro alt'd t yxttta Infanic at SW 6-", Cotill to � � ? i tip' ±'�`_1T "77524 ;�quAr'y fool J� �j)erLY j1110 d �U residential 1013, c �s ;l�xti F 'll Name Arld es Dal 1 . supportI, The 'app3`caliosl of P'Adro avid Grilia Infanle at 5243 S , 6; Court to svi lb—1 el e i'li }vie 7.°24 square foot 'propc ly .tu Terra sulgle.-famdly residential loin, S�tiis t° J Print Name i r,.; 4-11 Pr: &arnora ssociates, Inc., Engineering Land Planning July 24, 2003 Mr. Pedro Infante 5243. S.W. 63rd Court South Miami, Florida 33155 RE: Residential Subdivision S.W. 63 Ct. & S.W. 53 St. South Miami, Florida Dear Mr. Infante: The following items were noticed during my site visit and also upon reviewing the survey for the above mentioned parcel of land. 1. The existing roadway slopes from S.W. 53 St. to the north and also slopes from the north towards S.W. .53 St. This slope is subtantial in grade and creates a low spot toward the north end of the subject property. 2. The existing residence at 5243 S.W. 63 Court currently is built 2 feet above the FEMA flood criteria for this area. Furthermore, the house is built above the existing crown of road elevations for the roads fronting the property. 3. The house to the north of the subject property appears to be built below the existing road elevations. If this visual review is correct it would lead to the statement that the house is probably built below the FEMA flood criteria. An elevation survey of this property can identify if this is correct. Based on this visual inspection, it appears that water is collecting at the low point of the street and the adjacent property. This however is being caused by the existing elevation of the roadway and the surrounding topography. Therefore, my recommendation when developing the plans for the proposed residence at Parcel I B" in the new Subdivision is to create a retaining wall around the interior property lines (north & east sides) to prevent any runoff from the new residence to shed storwater runoff onto the adjacent parcels. This is a common practice when developing a site that has adjacent parcels of land that are lower than the proposed site. Secondly , I recommend that a new catch basin and drainage system for this new subdivision be constructed at the northern most point of the subject property along S.W. 63 Court (east side). This system is to handle any runoff from the front of the proposed residence and also to alleviate some of the drainage issues created by the existing topography. Zamora & Associates, Inc. • 11410 North Kendall Drive, Suite 302 • Miami, Florida 33176 • (305) 273 -7801 Fax:- (305) 273 -9514 Please note that as :part of the review process during the permit stage for any new project, Miami -Dade County DERM's approval is required. During this review process Miami -Dade County DERM reviews the development plans to make sure that the proposed development complies with the County's requirements for fill elevation and that the site does not shed water onto the adjacent parcels of lands. Based on providing the retaining wall to retain stormwater within the site, new catch basin w /drainage and the required review process at Miami Dade County DERM, -T do not foresee any reason for disallowing the subdividing of this parcel of land and construction of a new residence. Should you have any questions or desire additonal information please, do not hesitate to contact me. SIA- so "R�trif ►1f�i+s •:,,�r p, fora 'E r� a1 44207 .. ,l,R cc: file i j Zamora & Associates, Inc. 11410 North Kendall Drive, Suite 302 Miami, Florida 33176 (305) 273 -7801 Fax: (305) 273 -9514 j k i:. - a EXHIBITS 1. RS -2 Zoning Classification 2. Lots in area 3. South Miami Comprehensive Plan 4. Ordinance No. 9 -02 -1777 \75694 \19254\ # 632754 v 1 7/28/03 4:30 PM e t 1 Aa �:,,. �.I 4 I __1 _' ,1 1 {!! 1 s :1 �I, ,I e r`. . ry�uxa`�i�. 1 Aa �:,,. �.I 4 i ZONING REGULATIONS 20 -3.5 (B) Nonresidential Districts. In nonresidential districts, the minimum lot area and front- age, minimum yard setbacks, maximum floor area, maximum coverage and maximum building heights for permitted uses in each district shall be determined from the Dimensional Requirements Table for nonresidential districts (Section 20- 3.5G): (C) Dimensional Requirement Tables. (1) The use of land and the erection of buildings and other structures on land shall be subject to the dimensional' requirements of the applicable zoning district, as reflected on the three tables labeled "Dimensional Requirements, Single- Family Districts" (Section 20- 3.5E), "Dimensional Requirements, Multi- family Districts (Section 20 3.5F) and "Dimensional Requirements, Nonresidential Districts" (Section 20- 3..5G). (2) There shall be no variation or deviation from such dimensional requirements except where expressly allowed by this Code. (3) Minimum and maximum dimensional requirements for permitted uses within a PR or PI use district shall be the same as those listed in the following tables for uses within the most restrictive use district located adjacent to the subject PR or PI property. (D) Reserved, Section 20 -3.5E DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS SINGLE - FAMILY DISTRICTS REQUIREMENT RS-1 RS -2 RS -3 RS -4 RS -5 Min. Lot Size Net Area 'sq. ft.) 40,000 15,000 10,000 6,000 6,000 Frontage (ft.) 125 100 75 60 50 Min. Yard Setbacks -(ft. ) Front 50 35 25 25 25 Rear - 25 25 25 :25 25 Side (Interior)$ 12.5 10 7.5 7.5b 7.5" Side (Street) 20 15 15 15 15 Max. Building Height Stories 2 2 2 2 2 Feet 25 25 25 25 25, Max. Building Coverage ( %) 20 30 30 30 30 Max. Impervious Coverage ( %o) 30 40 40 45 45 g Cumulative width of both side yards shall be not less than 20 percent of total lot width. b Except that additions to existing structures may have 5 feet interior side setbacks where any portion of the building already has a 5 feet setback. Stipp. No. 5 49 TER RESOLUTION NO, 80-02-114-29 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA RELATING TO A ` REQUEST FOR A WAIVER OF PLAT PURSUANT TO SECTION 20- 4.2(B) OF TAE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND SECTION 28 -4 OF THE COUNTY CODE, REGARDING THE PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE RS -2, "SEMI- ESTATE RESTDENTIAL," LOCATED AT 5228 SW 63M COURT, SOUTH MIAMI FLORIDA 33155; PROVIDING FOR BONDING PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 -9 OF THE COLE OF ORDINANCES PROVIDING FOR A LEGAL DESCRIPTION; AND, PROV DTNG FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Manuel G. Vera, can behalf of Josefina Nassar owner of the property at 5228 SW 63 'rd Court, submitted an application requesting a waiver of plat, pursuant to Section 20- 42(h) of the Land Subdivision Regulations and, WHEREAS, Planning staff has recommended approval of the application for said waiver, which is based upon (a) the merits of the application as it relates to requirements in the Land Development Code and (b) the application's Consisteney with the City's adopted Compressive Plan; and, WHIrREAAS, the Mayor and City Commission of the !City of South Miami desire waive the requirements of the platting procedure pursuant Section 20- 4'.2(b) of the Land Subdivision Regulations and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR. AND CITY CON MISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, EL,ORIDA; Section 1. The application submitted' by Manuel C. Vera, on behalf of 7asefina Nassar, requesting a waiver of plat, for the property legally described in Section 2, pursuant to Section 20- 4.2(b) of the Late Subdivision regulations and, is granted. S c i n' 2, LE AL DESCRIPTIONS )i ar n Tr LOT 1, BLOCK 1 OF "LA HAMACA," ACCORDING' TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDER rN PLAT BOOK 51 AT PAGE 25, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI- DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE EAST 10.00 FEET OF THE NORTH. 198.00 FEET OF THE NOR` H' /2 OF THE WEST' /2 OF THE N.W_ 'f OF THE S.E. /d OF TINE S.W. '/$ OF SECTION 24, TOWNSAIF :54 SOUTH, 'RANGE 40 EAST LYING AND BEING IN MIAMI- 1DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS THE NORTH 120. FEET THEREOF. CONTA TNTNG 361430 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS OR 0.84 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. d duvd -'Wvo9: ©E' u0 -9 E-7f1(' !VVU9B999OE !'IAVIN Hin0t; d0 Alla : A8 1N35 ^`'" , _ ?�a •s,,,f'�2"4, xe"?�- v . ,"".�"°` -- - 'i€5:,'j�? Y?,'. g. '_�.; .,3".,'"� +. - � �r�' t `4F'.,.. °�;; ^°`,- -,- -^".-t�; z+, �' s,: Z_' „- _`:`*`""� .7;u . ?,T`i"- ,s it =., 5. :�: Page 2 of'Res. No. 80 -02 -11429 Resulting Parcel " THE SOUTH 104.32 FEET, OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRT13FD -PARCEL OF LAND- LOT 1, 13LOCK 1, OF "LA HAMACA," ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 51, AT PAGE 25, OF THE .PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI- DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE EAST 10.00 FEET OF THE NORTH 198.00 FEET OF THE NORTH '' /s OF 'ITHE WEST t /a' OF THE NW '/a OF THE S.E. '/< OF TFTF S;W 1/, OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 54 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST LYING AND BEING IN'MIAMI- DADE`COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS THE NORTH 120.00 FEET THEREOF, CONTAINING 15,001 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS, OR 0.34 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Rcsultina Parcel "D": LOT 1, BLOCK 1, OF THE "LA HAMACA," ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 51 AT PAGE 25, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF NUAM1 DARE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE .EAST 10.00 FEET OF THE NORTH 198.00 FEET OF 'rHE NORTH /2 OF THE WEST '/2 OF THE N.W. '%# OF THE S,E, 'A OF TFff,, S.W, '14 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSMP 54 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST LYING AND BEING 1N`MTAMI- DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS THE NORTH 120:00 FEET THEREOF AND LESS THE SOUTH 104:32 FEET THEREOF, CONTAINING 21,430 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS, OR 0.50 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Section 3. Drawings submitted by the applicant, as part of the record for this City Commission meeting prepared by' Manuel C-T. Vera and Associates, Inc., dated September 18, 2001, and revised on February 25, 2002 project number 98- 05 -98, shall be the guiding plan for development. Section 3, This resolution shall take effect immediately upon approval, PASSED AND ADOPTED --this 4th day of June, 2002 ATTEST; APPROVED: CfTf CLERk MAYOR Con'fldssion Vote: 5 -0 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mayor Robaida: Yea 'Vice Mayer Russell; Yea Commissioner Feliu Yea Commissioner Bethel; Yea CRT." TTC]RNEY Commissioner Wiscambe: Yea 1 2J17d !nvuu: E' E 80 9 E -uhf ! gV0gU9950£ ! IHVIW Hinou j0 Aiio :A0 LN25 ,ter .. k .�.. ,_, _.. ,,,, . s oU r South Miami t 3 .r �C u_ + 'INc6It PC) RATED ` 1 l27 ' C} it Excellence, Integrity, Inclusion To Honorable Mayor, Vice Mayor Bate: ,Tune 4, 2002 City Commission From: Charles Scutrr � � RE: Waiver of Plat City Alana er 5228 ,W 63 "Court REQUEST: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR & CITY C't)MMIS:SSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIA.MI, FLORIDA., R1`LATING TO A REQLI ,ST FOR A WAIVER OF PLAT P1JRSUANT TO SECTION 20- 4,2(B,) OF THF LAND DEVELOPMENT (OD AND SECTION 28 -4 OF THE COUNTY CODE. REGARDING THE PROPERTY LOCATED IN THF: RS -7, "SEMI` FSTtk *T' : R17,SIDLNTIAL," LOCATED AT 5228 SW 63R° CQUR "C. SWTH MIAMI FLORIDA 33153; PROVIDING FOR BONDrNCr PU RSUANT TO SECTION 17 -9 OF THE CODF OF ORDINANCES, PROVIDING FOR A ,I E(-JAL DESCRIPTION; .AN'Ia, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DA'I'S. On March 1. 2002, an Application fur Vyaiver of Flat was applied for by Manuel Ci. Vem on behalf of Ms. Jose itna Nassar, in order to divide a tract of land described a,, property folio 09- 4024- 026 -0010, located. at ,5228 SW 63 " Court, I LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ,SEE,477AC:HME'A'1- -A" ANALYSIS: _- The proposed waiver of` plat would create two single residential properties;, zoned rtS -? "Semi- Estate Residential," located at 5228 SW 63`d court. The twt) parcels at this location are consistent with the RS -2 zoning on the cast and south of the subject property. Properties on the north and west, although residetitial lots, are outside the City Limits, located in unincorporated Miami -Dade (.'ounty, The proposed . wavier of plat is creating tracts that are larger than required by 'the land development regulations for RS -2. Pursuant to Section 20 -3 -517 of the Land Development Code, Dimensional Requirements Sin L'le- Family District are as follows: LIV 3M •`WVOO :iE 00-9E-inr IUn9099a00 IIHVIA Hinou J0 Ai10 :A8 A33 i i 1.z'idi=°+",�I .- 9,::: ac'.�.ss"o..��-?"'�" "uia „z�;^-;- tw'ix;.,.. ,, ,i.3,d'z �"'�`- '?'st''%'".. ..R".- ,i'e., °.f_"'; .. .... ., :,F;�E^`°'.�m.,..•;¢e!?ssa�'- a `�,.fiit :nrrt. "",r'”, ; :�� ,q >:."f e t Fpcuver of Phd — S? :S' .5 "�l' � "r •Str'�'c�t June 4 2002 ZQNIiyC.; 114I1b(ARY fc�r Lak "C"• (a) Zoning Desigmj.tion: RS -2 "Scrili- E:statc Residential (b) Lase: Single- Family (c) Legit Size: 15,001 s.f. proposed, Nfiniinuin to sire 15,000 s.f. required. (d) Building frontage; 104,32 feet proposed, Minimum Frcmtage 100 feet required. ZONING SUMMARY for Lot "W (a) Zoning Designation: RS -2 "Semi - Estate Residential" N [_1:5e: Siulc- Family (01,0t Size: 21,430 s,L proposed, finimum lot size 15,000 s.f. roquired, (d) Building frontage: 143.64 feet proposed, Minimum frontage; 100 feet rctluirc;d, (e) Proposed Yard Setbacks: Minimum Setbacks: Front 75,75' 351 -0 Rear.... 65.891 251.0-- Side (Interior) 27.14' 10,-0" (Cumulative width of both side Y ards shall not be less than 20% of the total lot width) Side (lnterior) ... 9.15' 1U' -O.„ C'urrc;ntly lot ''D" has an existing one -story single -f irnily residential structure c.)n the subject property. The current survey indicates an existing nonconlor icing side setback of 9015 feet oil the north side. The south side: indicates a proposed side setback of 27.14 feet the rTli.nitnurn cumulative setback required is 28.73 feet, theretre the property will meet the regtrircdetba4kw APPI.lQABLF REgL ATIC)l !S Land Development Code Section 20 -3.5 Dimensional Requirement, Section 20- 4.2(b) Lance Subdivision 17.egulations • Section 2041 .Adequate public facilities C'ornprelicnsive Plan Coals, Objectives, and Policies of the Future Lund Use Element Dade County Code Chapter 28-4 SUbd vision Regulations Ll s 3QVd ! nvuu : E,E U0 -8 E'-lIl( � 8t�E9 99 QE I IWVIW Hinou do Aiio :AO 1N39 PraivOr n1'f l it . 8SR'62 tStreet June 4, 2002 c 'Y PuiTe ATTA+CfilafENT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parent Tract: LOT 1, BLOCK I OF `'LA HAMAC'A. " ACCORDING TO THE PLAT TFIER.LOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 51, AT PAGE 25. OF THF, PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI- DADS COUNTY. FLORIDA, AND THE EAST 10.00 FEET OF THE NORTF -I 195.00 MEET OF THE NORTTI'/y OF THE WEST /z OF THE N.W. '/4 OF THE S E, 1114 OF THE S.W_ '% OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 54 SOUTH, RANGE 40 FAST LYING AND) BEING IN MIA11I DADE'CW..F ;TY, FLORIDA. LESS THE. NORT14 120. FEET TTIERI OF. CONTATI+IINCr 36,€30 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS OR 0.84 ACRES. MOPLE OR T:FfiS, ResultipA Parcel "C": TTIE SOUTH 104.32 FEET, OF THE 1''(1I.1.OWING DESCRIBED PARCEL. OF LAND: LOT l BLOCK 1 OF "LA HAMAC'_A," ACCORDING TO THE PLAT "I- HEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 51, AT PAGE 25, OF THE PUAL1C RECORDS OF MIAMI- DALE. COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE EAST 10.00 FF.FT OF THE NORTH 19$.00 FEET OF THE NORTH ; ; / °. OF THE WEST '/7 OF THE NW/4 OF THE. S.F. /4 OF THE S.W. '/ OF SECTION 24 TOWNSHIP 54 SOUTH, RAID OE 40 FAST LYING AND BF.TNI' r fLN MIAMI - ' FLORIDA. ' LESS THE � ORM 120.00 FEET TIIER1:OF. CONTAININC; 15,001 SQUARE FEE',1', MORE OR LESS, OR 0.34 ACRLS, jlvfORE OR LESS. Resulting € arcel I'l) ", LOT 1, BLOCK 1, OF T1IE "LA HANIACA," AC ~CORDING TO THE PLAT THEK1;Ol", AS RECORDED rN PLAT BOOK 51 Al- PAGE' 25, OF THE PUBLIC. RECORDS OF MIAMI- DADE'COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND TT4E LAST 10.110 FEET OF THE NORTH 198,00 FEET OF THE NORTH V2 OF THE WEST 1/ OF THE N.W. 1/ OF THE. S.E. '' /a OF THE S.W, E/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNS141P 54 SOUTH; RANGE; 40 EAST LYf G AND BEENG IN MIAMI- TRADE COUNTY, FL0PdDA. LESS THE NORTIT 120.00 FEET THEREOF AND LESS THE SOUTH 104312 FEET THEREOF CONTAINING 21,430 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS, OR 0.50 ACRES,, NI01tE OR LESS_ t L(L Judd �WVEO. FE EO-9E-lflf . e 81�E9o0950E �IV4bIW H1f10V J0 h1I0 :h® 1N�5 Folio No.: 09- 4024- 054 - 0020 - Property: 5301 SW 63 CT Mailing Address: SCOTT CALANDRO &W ELIZABETH B Primary Zone: 5301 SW 63 CT MIAMI FL 33155- Property Information; Primary Zone: 2100 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE CLUC: 0001 RESIDENTIAL - SINGLE FAMILY Beds /Baths: 212 Floors: 2 Living Units: 1 t Ad S Footage: e: l q 9 . 2 , 385 Lot Size: 17,729 SQ FT Year Built: 1967 LA HAMACA PB 79 -88 LOT 2 LOT SIZE IRREGULAR OR Legal Description: 20651- 4337 0912002 1 Sale Information: Sale O /R: 120651-4337 Sale Date: 9/2002 Sale Amount: $500,000 Assessment Information: Year: 2002 2001 Land Value: $91,575 $76,190 BuIIding; Val ue: $108,606 $99,792 Market Value: $200,181 $175,982` Assessed Vdiue.', $200,i$i $i75,ya2 Total Exemptions: $0 $0 Taxable 'Value: $200,181 $175,982 i (Close windowl [Click here to Printl This report was created on 6/25/2003 3 :38:16 PM for reference purposes only. Web Site'Oc 2002 Miami -Dade County. All rights reserved. c k j p } 4 ,., c, ..... .. ,. ,.. , n ice. F.:rT , ,: nr a• r��ehi..nr en�nn rin�lnn Primary', Zone: 2100 SINGLE: FAMILY: RESIDENCE CLUC: 0001 RESIDENTIAL- SINGLE FAMILY Beds /Baths: 212 Floors: 2 Living Units: 1 Footage: 2,385 Lot Size: 17,729 SQ FT Year Built: 1967 Legal Description: LA HAMACA PB 79 -88, LOT '2 LOT SIZE IRREGULAR OR 20651 -4337 09/2002 1 " c �vr .Sale Information: t.. �t �m i sw 55TH ST.j, r . Sale O /R: 20651 -4337 Sale Date: 9!2002 Sale Amount: $500,000 Assessment Information: Year: 2002 2001 Land Value: $91,575 $76;190 Building Value: $108,606 $99;792 Market Value: $200,181 $175,982 Assessed Value: < <$200,181 $175,982: Total $0 $0 Exemptions: axable Value: $200, 181 $175,982 181 $175,982 Folio No.: 09- 4024 - 026 -0061 Property: 5421 SW 63 CT Mailing Address: A B CLYATT &W ANN MARIE Primary Zone: 5421 SW 63 CT MIAMI FL 33155 -6464 Property Information: Primary Zone: 2100 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE CLUC 0001 RESIDENTIAL- SINGLE FAMILY Beds /Baths: 2/2 Floors: 1 Living Units: 1` Adj Sq Footage: 2,465 Lot Size: 21,562 SQ FT Year Built: 1979 24 54 40.495 AC LA HAMACA PB 51 =25 W1/2 LOT 5 BLK 1 LOT Legal Description: < SIZE IRREGULAR OR 13629 -2553 0488 1 Sale information: Sale 0 /R: 13629 -2553 Sale Date: 4/1988 Sale Amount: $138,300 Assessment Information: Year: 2002 2001 Land Value: $111,375 $92,664 Building Value: $120,031 $110,555 Market Value: $231,406 $203,219 ,vssessea value;' $152,728 $150,323 Homestead Exemption: $25,000 $25,000 Total Exemptions: $25,000 $25,000 Taxable Value: $127,728 $125,323 [Close window]. [Click here to Printl. This report was created on 6/25/2003 3:43:07 PM for reference purposes only. Web Site © 2002 Miami -Dade County. All rights reserved. � , ,x..1 *,SLY, s!- °..$w,"'� °.�°�`�3^.? c . ...5 . A..: -f"�« <- ':rs °„x ,.q.�.; s�..1t, , �w,r �!.: t"3°t?. ' � ,si'�?` ; •:;. .-. ,�,'i"a' ..m?'s='�. °�s',. "±3tl'.. —,a„ 2, ^T� „`R"�°” "; F �.s`�'f. " " r.?�- "g'",� --sF ,,...R a,. , .4�fi �, rA, • Folio No.: 09- 4024 - 059 -0020 ` Property: 15501 SW 63 CT Mailing Address: SOCIETY OF THE SACRED HEART Primary Zone: UNITED STATES PROVIDENCE INC 5501 SW 63 CT SOUTH MIAMI FL 33155 -6465 Property Information: " Primary Zone: 2100 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE CLUC: 0001 RESIDENTIAL - SINGLE FAMILY Beds /Baths: 5/4 Floors: 1 Living Units: 1 Adj Sq Footage: 3,297 i Lot Size: 17,424 SO FT Year Built: 1970 PHILLIPS PARK PB 87 -87 LOT 2 BLK 1 LOT SIZE IRREGULAR Legal Description:' OR 18679 -3256 0699 1 Sale Information: Sale 0 /R: 18679 -3256 Sale Date: 611999 Sale Amount: $325,000 Assessment Information: Year: 2002 2001 Land Value: $90,000 $74,880 Building Value: $197,157 $153,278 Market Value: $287,157 $2,28,158 Assessed value:' $287,157 $128,158 Total Exemptions:: $0 $0 - Taxable Value: $287,157 $228,158 [Close windowl rMick here to Print] a This report was created on 6/25/2003, 3:45:05' PM for reference purposes only. I- ,i I Web Site ©'2002 Miami -Dade County. All rights reserved.'' i a .r,.�'�''3€�`- �.�''A, „. ..% .,.;. ... .: •;fit.. .emirs"' ,?�A�— 'n',,.x .,''',..'„�?s+` „`°G.M1C!',�!^`E.- �^^'.., •.�' ;F'�A,"'?�'.� '�" k�"�"�' ,s �'�Aa ��L"4., ],6, F":'"�?"m�",r"3P,°�`.�A„�€f� ,..T""�" Property lnformatlon Search By:, Select Item —text oniv iersioll I - j Summary Details: Folio No.: Miami -Dade My Home Pro en ;. 5240 SW 63 CT Page 1 of t ARMANDO :J LOPO &W EMMAG '. Address: $202;004 $176 ,936 5240 SW 63.CT: MIAMI FLA - 33155 -6429. Assessed Value $197,995 CLUC• FAMILY $25,000 My Home Total Exemptions Beds /Baths 412. Ella Value: 3 '$169,877 Floors 1 � Lawn Uniis tv e s Adj Sq �.ti� 1i rt _ Shew me Foola e Property lnformatlon Search By:, Select Item —text oniv iersioll I - j Summary Details: Folio No.: :0-401A-0 I 103u Pro en ;. 5240 SW 63 CT Mailing ARMANDO :J LOPO &W EMMAG '. Address: $202;004 $176 ,936 5240 SW 63.CT: MIAMI FLA - 33155 -6429. I i Property Information: 2001 Land Value Pnma -Zone 100 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Building Value $202;004 $176 ,936 Markel Value 0001 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE $285,616 Assessed Value $197,995 CLUC• FAMILY $25,000 $25,000. Total Exemptions Beds /Baths 412. Ella Value: 3 '$169,877 Floors 1 � Lawn Uniis 1 I Adj Sq 2.743 � Foola e 1 ' Lot Size 13,094 SO FT Year Built 1969 74 5440 BLUE ROAD MANORS PB ' Legal i 64- 75. LOT 3. LOT SIZE127.130X Description 103' Sale Information: S la nip. - Sale Date 010 — Sale Amount so Assessment Informations ` Year - 2002': 2001 Land Value $119,810 $108,680 Building Value $202;004 $176 ,936 Markel Value $321;814 $285,616 Assessed Value $197,995 $194,877 ` e�J $25,000 $25,000. Total Exemptions $25,000 $25 000 Ella Value: $172;995 '$169,877 Digital Orthophotography - March 2001 0 1.00 ft { We appreciate your feedback, please take a minute to complete our ssff i7v. fe9y Hat in Property Information :Prope ty.:Taxes.I .Nly Ne-ght orhood I Property Appraiser Flornc Using Qur.Site. I r;i)oufi phone Directory: Privacy I Disclaimer 1 If you experience technical difficulties with the Property Information application, please click here to let us know. 1 E -mail your comments, questions and suggestions to Webmaster i Web Site ©2002 Miami -Dade County. All rights reserved. Miami -Dade My Home Paae 1 of 2 Property Information Search By: Select Item Text Onl r vcrsion Summary Details: Folio No.: Prop erl i —_ 5300. SW 63 CTS Mailing ALEX STEPICK III &W CAROL D ' Address: 5300 SW 63 CT MIAMI FL 33155-6450 Property Information: Primary Zone 21.0O. SINGLE (FAMILY RESIDENCE CLUC: 0001 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY Beds /Baths '41 Sale Information: nrQ� 1 nn42_inaq 3' Floors 1 Living Units 1 dl Sq 3 018 Footage: Lot Size: 13,094 SO FT Year Built 1959 Legal 24 54 40 BLUE ROAD MANORS PB Description 64'75 LOT 2 LOT SIZE 127..130 X 103 OR 1.8092 -1889 0598 1 Sale Information: nrQ� 1 nn42_inaq Sale Dale. ; 5/1998 Sale Amount '.. $269,500 Aacrssmant Infnrmatinn- Year. 2002 20D1 Land Value $119,810 $108,680 Building Value: $176,969 .$158137 Market Value $296 ,579 $206,817 Assessed Value $217,,473 $214,048 Homestead $25,000 $25,000 Total Exern trons $25,000 $25,000 TaxahleUalue $192;473 $189,048 Digital Onhophotography -March 2001 0 100 ft r � We apprecia le your feedback, please lake: a minute to complete our My F on" Prop:er'ty I,rifonn ion. I ;Froperty.:..taxe4, I IVIy Neighborhood I Propel ty Appraiser tionie. ) Using.OUr Site I `About I Phone Directory I }privacy I Disclaimer: If you experience technical difficulties with the Property Information application, please dick, here to lot us know; Y E -mail your comments, questions and suggestions to VVebnlaster Web Site © 2002 Miami -Dade County. £v All rights reserved. ,,�"a;,;:,�... x, - ,•:., :'m^,,.;^-r s,.. .,�"�,k T�, ,", �`."1s. : trons $25,000 $25,000 TaxahleUalue $192;473 $189,048 Digital Onhophotography -March 2001 0 100 ft r � We apprecia le your feedback, please lake: a minute to complete our My F on" Prop:er'ty I,rifonn ion. I ;Froperty.:..taxe4, I IVIy Neighborhood I Propel ty Appraiser tionie. ) Using.OUr Site I `About I Phone Directory I }privacy I Disclaimer: If you experience technical difficulties with the Property Information application, please dick, here to lot us know; Y E -mail your comments, questions and suggestions to VVebnlaster Web Site © 2002 Miami -Dade County. £v All rights reserved. ,,�"a;,;:,�... x, - ,•:., :'m^,,.;^-r s,.. .,�"�,k T�, ,", �`."1s. My F on" Prop:er'ty I,rifonn ion. I ;Froperty.:..taxe4, I IVIy Neighborhood I Propel ty Appraiser tionie. ) Using.OUr Site I `About I Phone Directory I }privacy I Disclaimer: If you experience technical difficulties with the Property Information application, please dick, here to lot us know; Y E -mail your comments, questions and suggestions to VVebnlaster Web Site © 2002 Miami -Dade County. £v All rights reserved. ,,�"a;,;:,�... x, - ,•:., :'m^,,.;^-r s,.. .,�"�,k T�, ,", �`."1s. Property Information Search By: Selectitem 0 Text onl„version Summary Details: Folio No: 30 -4 1 1- iiiaf. ..._....... Property: 5340 SW 63 CT Mailing..' PAUL R RINGEMANN &W KAREN Address: W Floors 5340 SW. 63 CT MIAMI FL Liwng Units 33155-6450 Property Information: 2100 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE .:2001 i CLUC: FAMILY Beds /Baths: 3/2. Floors PnmaNZone 2100 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE .:2001 0001 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE CLUC: FAMILY Beds /Baths: 3/2. Floors 1 Liwng Units 1 dl Sq ' 3 072 Footage P 1tes 'ad Lot Size 15;668 SO FT Year:BUilt. 1957 $25 000 BLUE ROAD MANORS PB 64-75 Lear LOT 1 LOT SIZE 152.120 X 103 OR Description 1344512601D871 Year. 20D2. .:2001 Land Value Sale Information: Sale O /R: 13445 -1260 Sale Date: 10/1987 it Sale Amount 1$167,000 ` Assessment Information: Year. 20D2. .:2001 Land Value $143,362 $130,044 Building Value: $169,859 - .$152,060 Market Value: $313,221 "$282,104 '... Assessed Value' $184;894 -$1.81 982 - P 1tes 'ad $25,000 $25,000 Total Exemptions. $25;000 $25 000 TaxablelValue $159;894 $156,982.. Digital Orlhophotography -March 2001 0 101 ft { We appreciate your feedback, please take a minute to complete our =a,� - t� 015. c Prot e.rt Ir tu.rrr pion F�awerty.Taxes i My Re.lig bonc�,od I ProPe.rty Appr'atser. l� Nome 1 Using Our Site I AhOUt I Phone Directory PrtVacy I Discla rmelr l� Ifl If you experience technical difficulties with the Property Information application, please click I) here to let us know. wE -mail your comments, questions and suggestions to Webmaster j Web Site it .� © 2002 Miami -Dade County. i All rights reserved. h� , Property Information Search By: Select "Item r Text on1 V version Summary Details: Folio No. 30 -4 -t 1 1 Pro erly: 5285 SW 64 AVE Mailing ALEJANDRO:DE LA CRUZ Address: 3/3 Floors 5285 SW 64 AVE MIAMI FL - - 33155-6462 Property Information: Pnma `.Zone:2100SINGLEFAMILY .RESIDENCE:. CLUC '. 0001 RESIDENTIAL- SINGLE $125 895 FAMILY Beds /Baths. 3/3 Floors 1 Living Units: 1 Act Sq 31030 Footage: It nu end m, Lot Size: 13,759 SO FT '. Year Built: 1958 Legal BLUE ROAD MANORS PB,64 75 Description LOT .5 LOT SIZE 127.080 X OR 20381 2831.: 04/2002 1... Sale Information: Cafe njR,` TIR1 784.1 Sale Date Sale Amount: 72002 $385 000 Assessment Information: Year 2002' 2001 Land Value. $125 895 $114,200 Building Value $170,967 $153,389 ". Market Value $296,862 $267,589 Assessed Value $175,248 $172,488 It nu end m, $25,000 $25,000 otal Exem Lions $25 000 $25,000 Taxable V21ue' $150,248 $147,488 Digital Orthophotography - March 2001 `. 0 98 ft �'.. We appreciate your feedback, please take a minute to complete ours %9y ;it }rrir r rl crt� Intc.rt't ntic.. I Prop i :y ..Taxes. I TOY. Neighborhood I Propertl` ?ppr�tser Home Using Qur Site I About Phonr.- Directory I Privacy I Disclaimer If you experience technical difficulties with the Property Information application, please click. here to let us know. E -mail your comments, questions and suggestions to Webmaster Web Site ©'2002 Miami -Dade County. All rights reserved. a�"�,r .,°F`m =. ..^. �;s., m,�'ri �, .'. "^grcrc':.. r€ „rya *; ;e., .�,x:: r.:, '°;s°, �^'4: •,R^Ax- °�,�at ,_—'+' ,* ,m„s: s.,..,:, : "tt .”. °%,-°"�@`. i" ;...: c'S;m;.. .'t";', ,:. `x''; '�,.�,,a, <'7`" ,"?".. +:: ;'F�:.,.''v,- Fo"`?"a, Folio No 0-4f! I 16O , Pro ert 5305 SW 64 AVE Mailing.: TULIOOUIRANTES &W MARIA Address: 4/3: , Floors 5305 SW 64 AVE MIAMI FL Living :Units: 33155 -6432 Property Information: Pnma..Zone 2100 SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENCE CLL1C:. 0001 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE $116,269 FAMILY Beds /Baths: 4/3: , Floors 1 Living :Units: 1 dl Sq 3 823 Footage: {' n e`d an f ctl9i' Lot Size, r 12,707 SO FT Year Built: 1959 Legal 24 54 40 BLUE ROAD MANORS PB Description' 64 -75 LOT 6 LOT SIZE 127.070.X 100 OR 11955- 1412 -1083 1 Sale Information 3: Ei i t 4 •.y������a � k c ionrR.. iigs5tet�. ,. �, •sr Kip t ,',,',zh oil Sale Date: _ 10/1983 Sale Amount ' $135,000 Assessment Information: 4 r Digital: Onhopholography - March 2001 0 98 ft We appreciate your feedback, please taken minule to complete our,i t ai t loll c r roperty Infur..rnutlon I :P' ulae rty_Taxes I Th Nei hborhoocl. Prop:et`iY Ap,pralser Home tJ ing_Our Site I About I Phone G.i- rectory_ I Privacy I Discla_im:eY. Ifyou experience technical difficulties with the Property Information application, please click here to let us know. E -mail your comments; questions and suggestions to Webmaster Web Site ©2002 Miami -Dade County. < All rights reserved. . - n 1 , wTin p.. _a— Ll7 Iri/nI Year ...2002 _.2001 Land Value: $116,269 .$105468 Buildm Value: $200;415 ($179 508 Market Value: $316,684 ($284,976 Assessed : Value' $187,116 $184,169 {' n e`d an f ctl9i' $25,000 $25,000 Total Exem pons $25,000 $25,000 Taxable Value: $162;716 $159 169 Folio %No.: 30 -4024 -040 -0060 Property: 5400 SW 63 CT Mailing Address: ANTHONY I SNETRO JR &W DONNA Prim ,ary Zone: 5400 SW 63 CT MIAMI FL 2100 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 33155 -6466 Property Information: Prim ,ary Zone: 2100 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE CLUC: 0001 RESIDENTIAL- SINGLE FAMILY Beds /Baths: 413 I Floors: 1 Living Units: 1 I S Adj Sq Footage: 2,403 Lot Size: 13,120 SQ FT Year Built: 1958 24 54 40 MERTON PARK 1 ST ADD PB 64 -54 LOT 6 BLK 8 LOT' Legal Description: SIZE 127.380 X 103 OR 14266- 2705`D989 1 Sale Information: Sale O /R: 14266 -2705 Sale Date: 9/1989 Sale Amount: $125,000 Asses! ssessment Information: i, Year: 2002 2001 Land Value: $120,048 $108,896 Building Value: ! $127,981 $115,432 I, Market Value: $248,029 $224,328 Assessed •value:' � 45,95L $ 4a,u54 j Homestead Exemption: $25,000 $25,000' I, Total Exemptions: $25,000 $25,000 Taxable Value: $120,952 $118,654 [Close window] [Click here to Printl. This report was created on 6/25/2003 3:39:15 PM for reference purposes only. B Web Site ©.2002 Miami -Dade County. All rights reserved. P fi Oil , p[p P MAP LEGEND LJ Single- Fainily Residential (Two-Story) Duplex Residential (Two- Story) a Townhouse Residential (Two- Story) • Multiple - Family Residential (Four - Story) • Mixed -Use Commercial Residential (F01jr- Story) ' Commercial Retail & Office (Two-Story) J rt4J �jutU (4 +4- Story) Residential �••,I�i Office �C1�C��IZ�� s wo Sto ✓J (T - ' °C C � '' � Educational NORTH J,t� I (Four - Story) M Public and �- Institutional (Four= Story) NEW FUTURE LAND USE ATAY SOUTH I A 6 Parks and DA.DE r'OUNTY, FLORIDA Open Space -�!' a•� r� +. r *...a .� � _,..a -f � .'�°- .... �f.,�r,.vi . ,r'S :^Pr. �"#"^*; FJ,F� . 4 �1a;`� ..k: "�a.+, FUTURE LANT LSE CATEGORIES Js cc-bon comans lancuape »7hich explains t},e intent of the future Jand use map. Zonir.Q regv.la>jons J \ „;bich penr;it uses that are specifically permitted by this section and that also permit uses that are less intensive than these J-�ennttied by this section may be deemed to be consistent Nv th the comprehensive plan: Z.oni*tg tepula-L that are mare restrictive than the provisions of his section may also be consistent with II e comprehensive plan. 1-lie terms "less imensive” and 'more resvictive" in this section are not defined in this plan. Planned unil development zoning regulations which permit buildings to be higher than stdt.ed in this plan may be deemed consistent N -viilt this plan, provided such regulations do not permit the overall floor area on a site to be greater than could occur if the heighi limits of this plan %were obserA,ed :- Nothing in this plan is intended, or has the effect of, limiting or Modifying the right of any person to complete any planned development �ahicb has been issued `a final planned development order % ,,;hicb is in full force and effect and Nvhere development has commenced and is continuing in good faith, provided &,at all regulations and > conditions a� unposed by the CiTv are met. Anv legally gr- anted ',�ariances to a development code regulation vAlch implements this plan shall be deemed to be a legally granted v anaDce to this plan and as such shall be deemed to be consistent with this plan. This Variance provision. shall apply to all elements and sections of this plan Nested Rigehis: Nothing contained herein shall be construed as affecting, validly_ existing vested rights: It shall be the duty and responsibility- of the applicant alleging vested rights to affirmatively demonstrate the legal - requisites of vested rip]-its. Vested rights shall require "a demonstration to the Mawr and Cltl' Commission of the City of South Miami that the applicant (1) has relied in good faith, (2) upon some act or omission of the government. and (3) has made such a substantial chance in positron or incurred such c- ,nensive obligations and expenses to the applicant's detriment as to create an undue hardship. The mere -AiN existence of zoning contrary to the Sou tb 1liami Comprehensive Plan shall ;not be determined o vest. rights. Developmental actions where all required approvals have been received. or orders or permits that _preceded the official adoption ofthis Comprehensive Plan shall remain in full force and effect but subject to all applicable zoning laws and regulations of the City. The land development regulations to be adopted shall provide for specific standards to carry out these concerns. To reflect ° the repeated` nubJic c.oncems esr)ressed at the charrertes and public hearings regarding the preponder- :artce of land use regulations. the land use categories are reduced in number to reflect the traditional land use designations utilized by the planning profession Regulation of specific uses and Intensities V1111 be included under provJSionS in the Land Development Code. ('97 -]ER) Single - Family Residential (Two- Story) The single - family land use category is intended to provide for one residential dwelling unit on each parcel of land. New parcels should have a minimum area of 10.000 square feet. 1st areas where existing planing is characterized by parcels larger than 10.000 square feet. zoning regulations should be consistent %Vith such parcel; sizes provided thai minimum parcel sizes need not exceed one acre. In ai-fas Nvhere e-, sting planing is charactenzed by parcels smaller than 1 -0.000 square feet_ zoning regulations should be conststem with surroundmi? parcel sizes. Sites- ]a_rge enough to be subdivided into parcels of ] 0.000 square feet or larger could be zoned accordingly. but only if such zoning r -ould be compatible v,:ith surrounding development. (97 -1ER) Lot of Record: if the owner of a, platted lot in- any distract does not mNij a parcel or tract of land immediateh adjacent to such lot. and if tlre; deed or instrument under which such owner acquired title to 1 such lot v, -as of record prior to the application of any zoning regulations to the premises. or if such lot N ere created and first recorded in compliance -vith'tlie zoning regulations in effect on the lot at the time Of Tecording. and if such lot does not conform to the requirements of such regulations as to the -width of Element I Page Number 21 II "^4t.7`,�. lots and lot area, the provisions of such lot area and lot width regulations shall not prevent the owner of 'such lot from erecting a single - family dwelling or making other improvements on the 'lot, provided such improvements conform in all other respects to the applicable zoning regulations provided that StA platted lot is not less than fifty feet in width and has a frontage of at least fifty feet. The term "platted lot" as used herein shall mean a full and complete separate parcel designated as a lot, parcel, or tract as f part of a subdivision plat recorded in the public records of Dade County, Florida. I Zoning regulations shall not require any special hearing or approval process for lots that meet the requirements set forth herein. (97 -lER) Duplex Residential (Two -Story) The duplex, residential category is intended to provide for two $ residential dwelling units per parcel of land. Each dwelling unit should have its own at- grade direct access from the out -of- doors. Two - family structures should be developed at densities that do not exceed two dwelling units per 10,000 square feet. , jh;,.11 Ls a° �ln °a tea° 'ties nnot 0)je ORB dwelling tmit per- �+ ar site (97 -lER) Townhouse Residential (Two - Story) The townhouse residential category is intended to limit development to townhouse -type dwelling units on parcels of land not less than 60,000 10,000 square feet in area. Each dwelling unit should have its own at -grade direct access from the out -of- doors. Townhouse dwelling units should be developed at densities that do not exceed one dwelling unit per 7,260 square feet of site area. Individual parcels which meet the minimum site size of 10,000 square feet in area could be developed for use as single- family residential dwellings units. Zoning regulations which implement the townhouse category shot" shall prohibit �? si two-family structures + het and one single - family structures may be permitted to secure a vested right to use M legally created parcels which does not meet the minimum lot size ' requirements of this plan and/or the zoning ordinance. (97 -1ER) Multiple - Family, Residential i=y4 (Four -Story) a, The '°•-' dw;g, Are Medium ,a°„s; multiple - family residential land use categoryies -afe is intended to provide for residential densities of ' ' fag +� °+ ° ° > maximum of 24 dwelling units per net acre 1 u ' sive of 1t, '� ' s of ayl, "aspeetivel Multiple-famLly residential development shall be designed in order to create environmentally - sensitive and well- landscaped settings with pedestrian and multi - modal, transit - oriented amenities. Zoning regulations shall be implemented to preserve the existing densities of developed' properties within established districts. Designers should be encouraged to produce unique, flexible, multi -level projects, such as mixed -use developments including retail and office uses on ground floor levels. Zoning regulations for the proposed Park View 'Townhouse ' area should include an option whereby townhouse developments could be _l permitted at densities not to exceed 24 dwelling unit ep r acre. (97 -1ER) Residential Office (Two. -Story) The residential office land use category is intended to provide for the development of very- low - intensity office structures that are similar in development characteristics to single - family homes. Development characteristics shall include but not ` be limited to height, mass, volume, parking and - landscaping. Buildings shall not exceed two stories: i*o sha" any b ildi °d _254eet- &s shed! not ca Y fes i > --d r-eaf setbaeks shEdl net be less s8' p ib d In addition, ,heavy landscaping and screening shall be provided for parking areas, trash storage and other non - residential site characteristics. (97 -lER) Element 1 Page Number 22 I' CHAPTER 1 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT 41 I : INTRODUCTION This Future Land Use Element regulates the use of public and private land in South Miami. It does so I through the Future Land Use Map and through goals, objectives and policies. All goals, objectives and policies contained within the entire Comprehensive Plan are to be interpreted in a way which is consistent with the Future Land Use Map. Florida law: requires that all South Miami land development regulations be consistent with the Future Land Use Map, a4- related explanatory text, and with the goals, objectives and policies of this Land Use Element. Editor's Modification, August 19, 1997.' This Future Land Use Element also sets forth the reasoning on which the Future Land Use Map goals, objectives and policies are based. Existing land use data and analyses are included as a basis for the reasoning. LOCATION OF SOUTH MIAMI` South Miami is located in the southern portion of Dade County. The urban area which includes South Miami, together with other municipalities within Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach counties, form the lower east coast region of Florida. Urban development within the region has been concentrated on `a narrow area between the Atlantic Ocean on the east and the Everglades to the west, creating a pattern that includes almost one -third of the population of Florida. Bounded on the east in part by the affluent residential community of Coral Gables, and its prestigious University of Miami, and bounded on the south by the recently incorporated Village of Pinecrest. the City of South Miami is within easy access to major transportation corridors; `and, C of South Miami is a part of one of the most rapidly growing areas of Dade County.` Editor's Modification, August 19, 1997. The City of South Miami covers an irregular, rectangularly - shaped area which is approximately defined by Bird Road on the north, Davis Road on the south, Red Road on the east and Ludlam Road on the west. The City is entirely surrounded by unincorporated Metropolitan Dade County except for a small border with Coral Gables on the I east and the Village of Pinecrest on the south. The City of South Miami is also noncontiguous between Miller Drive and Bird Road with portions of the City divided by sections., bf unincorporated Metropolitan Dade County. Editor's Modification, August 19, 1997. EXISTING LAND USE DATA The City of South Miami is a small town' in the middle of a major metropolitan area. South Miami has an established small town residential character made up of ten distinct single - family neighborhoods. Multiple - family housing is scattered throughout the City at the periphery of single family neighborhoods. South Miami residents are served by local supermarkets and other 'convenience < retail uses and by a f pedestrian- oriented specialty comparison retail core: The City also has automobile repair establishments and other automobile service 'related uses. Commercial uses in South Miami serve populations located outside of South Miami as well as the people residing in the City. South Miami residents also can select from a broad range of retail sales and service uses at nearby locations outside the City. Existing land uses are depicted in Figure 1.1 and tabulated in Table 1 -1. Element 1 Page Number I a ORDINANCE NO. 9 -02 -1777' AN ORDINANCE OF TILE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF TITS CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO TIIE CITE' OF SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, A E- NDING_ SECTIOhI 2042 ENTITLED "LAND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS," IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH PROCEDURES AND CRITERIA FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF WAIVER -OF -PLAT APPLICATIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. i WHREAS, the City's Land Development Code currently has regulations addressing "Land Subdivision Regulations," and Waiver of Plat; and WHEREAS; the Land Development Code lacks specific procedures and criteria for reviewing and approving Waiver -of- Plat applications, and; WHEREAS, the City Comm-mission desires that Waiver of Plat applications be reviewed for compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood, and that surrounding neighbors be notified of the waiver -of -plat application; and has directed that such an amendment should be forwarded to the Planning Board for review and recommendation; and WHEREAS, a public hearing regarding the proposed amendment was held by the Plannsng Board on August 13, 2002, at which time the Planning Board voted 5 -1 to recommend approval of the proposed amendments to the City Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Commission desires to accept the recommendations of the Planning Board and enact the aforesaid amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY` COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH NIIAIvII FLORIDA: Section ,1. That Section 20 -4.2 entitled "Land Subdivision Regulations," of the City's Land Development Code, is hereby amended to read as follows: Page 1 of 3, ,y 0 -4.2 Lind subdivision reguNtions. (A) Applicable Regulalions. The subdivision of all lalid within the city shall be subje, tto Chapter 28 of the Dade County Code of Ordinances and administered by the Dade CountyDeparinnent of Public WOrICS. (B) PlatzedLot CoinpliL2nce. Every building Or St1 "UCttlre hereaf ff freCtCd, moved or strtictui-ally altered within the City shall be located on a platted lot, except that the City c0l nn1 sslon may waive platted lot compliance in accordance with Section 28-4 of the County Code arid the pr-ocedures set, forth below. U Tljcrr.'l)er- ofDial A waiver -Of -plat maybe al 7royed by the City Con- Imission, Prior to City Commission ar�proval, the application shall be reviewed by the Planinil 73oard. The subject property shall be posted L0 da prior to the Planning Board 'review of the application and mailed notice shall be T)rovided to all property owners within a 500 feet radius of the subject property. ?) 00) Commission Fh7d ng Prior to approving a waiver -of -plat the City Coi-runission - shall use the fol]owing Cyuidelines: O The buildilntr site created by the Proposed waiver- of_plat will be equal to or lamer than the majority'ofthe existing building sites and of the same character as the surrounding area this shall be demonstrated using comes of the official -olat ma s for the sub'ect property and surrounding neighborhood). The building site created by the proposed waiver-of-plat will not result in existing structures becoming nonconforming as s theyi-slate to setbacks and other applicable regulations of these land development regulations The building site created'b the proposed waiver -of plat wi11 be free of encroachments from abuttinc= buildable sites 3 Additional C.'ond liom,. The City Commission may desigiLate such additional conditions in connection with a waiver -of -plat as will, in its opinion. assure that such waiver -of plat will conform to the foregoing requirements Additignal Applicaliorr As part of the required waiver -of- -plat application, applicants shall be required to submit a proposed site�Ian for the resulting building parcels an 'existing tree survey (inabe included inroperty surveysTlnich shall indicate anVproposed tree rernoval or relocation necessary and if so the appropriate City of Cnitt ]r21S�1- 1��j�1 ian tree is or rej4{ tc -oA. Page 2 of 3 R. L G: Section 2. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 3. If any section, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstr'tutional' by a cou7-t of co7npete»t jurisdiction, till's holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be codified and included in the Land Development Code, Section 5. This ordinance shall take effect immediately at the time of its passage. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 17`l' day of -Member; 2002 ATTEST: APPROVED A CITY CLERK MAYOR 1 Reading - September 3); 2002 2nd Reading- September 17, 2002 (as amended) COSSION VOTE: 5 -0 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mayor Robaina: Yea Vice Mayor Russell Yea Commissioner Bethel Yea Commnlssioner Febu. Yea Commissioner Wiscombe: Yea CITYAT17bRNEY NOTE: New wording in bold, underlined; wording to be removed indicated by EtT4ke4h�, Page 3 of 3 South 'ia i soUT� All- eca`City 'INCORPORATED 1 927 1t+t ® R110 4. 2001 CITY OF SOUTH MIAML To: Honorable Mayor, Vice Mayor Date: July 29, 2003 and City Commission From: Maria V. Davis t +� Agenda Item No. City Manager RE: Stealth Telecommunications Antenna 6330 S.V. 40th St. (Bird Rd.) RESOLUTION: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, RELATING TO A REQUEST PURSUANT TO SECTION 20 -10.6 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR A SPECIAL USE APPROVAL TO PLACE A STEALTH CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6330 S.W. 40TH ST.(BIRD RD.) WITHIN THE "PI ", PUBLIC / INSTITUTIONAL ZONING DISTRICT. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS': The applicant, Metro PCS, Inc. is requesting approval to place a cellular communications facility, on property owned by Hope Lutheran Church, located at 6330 SW 40' St. (Bird Rd.). The facility will consist of four small antennas mounted at the roofline of the main sanctuary buildin g equipment The associated with these antennas will be located _ ,_ indoors, in an office area of the church. The antennas will be mounted on the side walls of the church building, just below the highest point of the roof. The antennas will be painted the same color as the church building, and will be very nearly invisible from the surrounding area. 1) The church property consists of a sanctuary building and two accessory structures, a one -story day care / parish hall, and a one story parsonage. The sanctuary building is built to a height of 60 ft The lot size is 1.3 acres. 2) The existing zoning on the property is "PI', Public Institutional Use District which permits churches, schools, and government facilities. The maximum height of buildings in this district is to be compatible with the height of surrounding districts. The current church sanctuary was constructed in 1962. The height approved at that time was 60 ft., thereby establishing the applicable height for the district at this location. 3) A previous telecommunications antenna was approved for this location in 2000. The existing antenna is located in a cross structure mounted on the church. However, there is Stealth Antenna 6330 SW 40`h Street July 29, 2003 Page 2 of 3 no ability for colocation within the cross structure, necessitating the need for these proposed stealth antennas. 4) The property is surrounded by the following zoning districts and existing uses: ZONING EXISTING USES North RU -5A (Miami Dade County) Professional offices Semi- Professional Office/ Apts. East RO Residential Office Office building / 3 stories RS -4 Single Family Residential Single family residences South RS -4 Single Family Residential Single family residences West GR''General Retail Retail stores, one story RS -4 Single Family Residential Single family residences APPLICABLE REGULATIONS 1) The City's Land Development Code contains extensive regulations for siting of telecommunications tower and antennas. The proposal in this application is considered a stealth facility as defined in Section 20 -10.2 of the LDC: "Stealth Facility -Any telecommunication facility which is designed to blend into the surrounding environment.` Examples of stealth facilities include, but are not limited to, architecturally screened, roof- mounted antennas, antennas integrated into architectural elements, and telecommunications towers designed to look like poles, power poles or trees" 2) The proposed facility is subject to requirements and minimum standards spelled out in Section 20 -10.4 which requires the submission of the following: a) A property owner's letter consenting to the installation; b) An affidavit stating that within one -half mile of the site there are no other structures which can accommodate the facility(collocation); c) An affidavit stating that there will be no interference with other wireless communications in the vicinity; d) An affidavit stating that the facility is designed to meet the current wind load criteria as set forth in the South Florida Building Code; e) An affidavit that the facility is compatible with the design of the existing i structure, 3) Section 20 -10.6 of the ; LDC provides that in certain zoning districts, a telecommunications facility may be approved by administratively by the City Manager after review by the ERPB. However, a stealth facility located a ` "PI" zoning district requires a special use approval process. Specifically, subparagraph 1(a) states that "stealth rooftop or building mounted antennas, not exceeding 25 ft. above the roofline and 10 feet above the maximum height of the applicable zoning district, shall be i - '„�;°"s+r:'= n#sns`-- a ;:-'", e •;-- „c , 7A.- �.� -s;,- ',p -:°n Stealth Antenna 6330 SW 40'" Street July 29, 2003 Page 3 of 3 permitted as an accessory use pursuant to special use approval in the following zoning districts: ... ... .... Public /Institutional The approval process requires the affirmative vote of four City; Commissioners, after receipt of a recommendation from the Planning Board.' 4) In addition to the above, all special uses must comply with the conditions specified in LDC Section 20 -10.7 Procedure for Special Use, LDC Section 20- 3.4(A) requiring compatibility with the surrounding uses, and LDC Section 20 -5.8 requiring that the proposed use not adversely affect the health or safety of persons in the vicinity nor will it be detrimental to the public welfare or property in the area (LDC Sections attached). PLANNING DEPARTMENT OBSERVATIONS Based on the information provided, the staff 'observes that: 1) The size of the antennas being located at the roof line of the sanctuary will not distract from the architectural style of the building. 2) The proposed -use is compatible architecturally, with the building on which it is being located and will not adversely impact surrounding properties. The Planning Department recommended approval that the proposed special use to install a stealth communications facility at 6330 SW 40th St. PLANNING BOARD ACTION The Planning Board conducted a public hearing on May 13, 2003 and recommended 5 -0 to approve the Special Use request. RECOMMENDATION' It is recommended that the proposed special use to install a stealth communications facility at 6330 SW 40th St. be approved. Attachments: Draft Resolution Locator Map Letter of Intent Application Site plan Elevations Power of Attorney Warranty Deed Copies of Public notices Excerpt from Planning Board Minutes, May 13, 2003 Visual Impact Analysis (Illustration photos) MVD /SB /SAY KAComm Items\2003 \07 -29 -03 \antenna 6330 Bird Rdreport.doc 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE =CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, 4 RELATING TO A REQUEST PURSUANT TO SECTION 20 -10.6 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE 5 FOR A 'SPECIAL USE APPROVAL TO PLACE A STEALTH CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY 6 ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6330 S.W. 40TH ST.(BIRD RD.) WITHIN THE "PI", PUBLIC, / 7 INSTITUTIONAL ZONING DISTRICT 8 9 WHEREAS Metro PCS, on behalf of Hope Lutheran Church., property owners of 6330 S.W. 40th St. has 10 submitted an application for a special use to allow a stealth cellular communications facility to be placed on 11 property located at 6330 S.W. 40' St., within the "PI" Public / Institutional Zoning District; and 12 13 WHEREAS, 'Section 20 -10.6 of the South Miami Land Development Code provides that a stealth 14 communications facility is permitted in a " PI" , Public / Institutional Zoning District as an accessory use pursuant 15 to a special use approval process ;and 16 17 WHEREAS, a stealth communications facility is subject to requirements and minimum standards specified 18 in Land Development Code Section 20 -10.4 in addition to compliance with conditions set forth in Land 19 Development- Code Sections 20- 3.4(A) and 20 -5.8, applicable to all special use approvals; and 20 21 WHEREAS. The approval of a special use requires a- recommendation from the Planning Board and the 22 approval of the City Commission after a public hearing; and 23 24 WHEREAS, The Planning and Zoning Department staff recommended approval of the proposed special 25 use: and 26 27 WHEREAS, on May 13, 2003, the Planning Board voted 5 -0 to recommend approval; and, 28 29 WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami desire to accept the 30 recommendation of the Planning Board. 31 32 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY 33 OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: 34 35 Section 1: That a special use approval is hereby granted for placement of a stealth communications facility on 36 property located at 6330 S.W. 40t'' St. in accordance with the plans submitted in the application. 37 38 Section 2: This resolution shall take effect immediately upon approval. 39 40 PASSED AND ADOPTED this , day of 2003. 41 42 ATTEST: APPROVED: 43 44 45 46 CITY CLERK MAYOR 47 48 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: Commission Voter 49 Mayor Feliu: 50 Vice Mayor Russell: I 51 Commissioner Bethel: 52 Commissioner McCrea: 53 Commissioner Wiscombe: !, 54 CITY ATTORNEY ��°�',.;T,r ^��;��•� -m, .,�..,a. ,. �'�A�., �= ;.�r""^r �;"�,. ..�:. , � �°�° z' �.. �,.:, i^- ;�a`.�-^.�;�s7°`�z�,,,.,�-r� ,.: �..re,,:�z � �a�+"'"'a„�,,�°+�; �, ;� 11 1 927 385 375 367 361:. 351 6343 337 329 21 311 924 6291 6279 6271 6259 3925 3928 3931 3: 39 3930 :3930 3935 -3930 ° 3935 3936 3941 ... ... .,�/ ,3.9TF TE .:..� �,.� - t - 3946 3944 j 3943 3948 ..3945 .3950 ? 3951.. 3948 3957 3950 3951 106400 6392 84 6376 6360` 6352 6342 6334 28 6310 6300 3931 `SUBJECT 3955 3958 j 3959 '3980 _ 3963 - 3962 PROPERTY 6245 6205 6101 6085 6035 0 p D EH±Eff634133 3 7 6321 3990 62 ; G a~ 6262 •� 4000 r 6420 6340 6250 6150 6090 6080 4020 EE 6395 387 75 67 63 47 - 6291 281: 271 261 6251 .4025 4032 4023 4024 4040 4024 4041 . ,,_.....::. SW -...41 ST .€... ,_ .,.. , 4033 0 4033 4032 4060 ( 4101 4100 4101 4100 4104 J 4109 p, 4100 6414 6402 6394 6386 74 6366 358 6346 338 6330 302 6300 F6294 282 '270 T2626250 .4108 4109' 4108 4114 4115 4125 4116 4117... 4116.' 4120 6395 6387 76 367 359 76339 31 1 315 6303 3' 6291 6279 j263 6251 C) 4124 4125 !.. 4124 4124 4121 4140 6415 6403 4132 4133 4132 .,,... <..,,, . ,,SW- „42ND ST :: .... Z 4135 4155 4160. .._ : 4140 .4180. 6394 63866374 6366 6358 66338 6330 6322 6302 6294 6282 6266 6250 235 6227 6219 6211 203 6143 135 127 6119 101 4195 4152 { 4190 6410 6400 6395 6375 6363 351 6339 6331 6323 6307 1 6291 6251 ... -SW 42ND .ST . ;. 6411 6401 6060 4201 4200 234 6228 F211 : 6142 134 126 118 110 70 4220 63A370 38 330 320 310 02 6290 282.270 6250 4220 4225 4226 4225 4221 4240' 6410 6400 4226 4224 639 339 331 321! 311 03 6295 6271 6251. 4233 4232 4233 4234 4233 4260 4241 4240 4241 4240 424D 6411 6401 .,_ ......:...... ,,,,,SW- 43RD SST __ ,._„ .. � 4301 also: ...... . ,:'” , ....: 4248 cw 4249: ! ...4240 6410 6400 4249 (: 4300. 1 4311 6290 5282 '272 6260 6250 4300 4301 0 4309 4308 U) 4305 4330 4316 4317 6291 6283: 271 263 251 4317 4316 4317 4350 4350. i 4325 4300 -,S1W -: •.44TH. -,ST.- 6235 6219 4318 4341 131 121 6117 111 6411 6401 4410 4335 p 6380 0 0 0 6330 6302 6290 82 270 6250 0 6380 4401 4450 6141 6133 6121 6101 6051 5999 59915 1 6400 6340 6230 6200 3 4420 - -44T.H TE .,� *�` 0 4460 4421 4410 W 4523 4470 4441 �� 4420 �1 4490 ", : A OR 6 192 190 6130 332 6310 6302 6141 =6375 6101 6051 HE [6: 4249 (: 4300. 1 4311 6290 5282 '272 6260 6250 4300 4301 0 4309 4308 U) 4305 4330 4316 4317 6291 6283: 271 263 251 4317 4316 4317 4350 4350. i 4325 4300 -,S1W -: •.44TH. -,ST.- 6235 6219 4318 4341 131 121 6117 111 6411 6401 4410 4335 p 6380 0 0 0 6330 6302 6290 82 270 6250 0 6380 4401 4450 6141 6133 6121 6101 6051 5999 59915 1 6400 6340 6230 6200 3 4420 - -44T.H TE .,� *�` 0 4460 4421 4410 W 4523 4470 4441 �� 4420 �1 4490 ", : A OR 6 192 190 6130 61 16': 6100 6050 6141 5133 6121: 6101 6051 5998 59905 8 5999 59915 81 0 100 200 300 600 900 1,200' Feet , �,.m , t,' ?fir ,�,.�;,.+�„.- ;.••�"';�+7f -;z- ,:t;� ;, ter• .. «: �..� -�._ �;,:,r �t. .:�""�„'�?'a” 1�„�re�:�. c•^-;�.'�r�;,;,�;,`.'��-,,.�. 4480 4501 4500 S: 45 �T _.. ` ••• __e 4521 0 00 60 ` - 4500 - 1 4490 1 4521 4510 614p 6130 6116 0 6020 6000 6 a wal i 4525 E 4525 4520 6141 6133 6121 3 60511 6021 6001 ;610} 4520 _ SW, 46TH. ST �..m .. _�.... „.... z 4600 6435 6401 m`� 4540 4535 `6100 is 6140 6130 6116 6050 5 4610 20 4645' �'� �"'`�",�'`' ,1 , • 4620 ; , 6141 6133 6121' ' 6101 6051 6 1 '6001 0 100 200 300 600 900 1,200' Feet , �,.m , t,' ?fir ,�,.�;,.+�„.- ;.••�"';�+7f -;z- ,:t;� ;, ter• .. «: �..� -�._ �;,:,r �t. .:�""�„'�?'a” 1�„�re�:�. c•^-;�.'�r�;,;,�;,`.'��-,,.�. 1401 NW 136th Avenue, Suite 304 euSam A4011h. M HCS Sunrise, Florida 33323 r Tel.: 954.839.2600 Fax: 954.838.8354 April 11, 2003 Plann;ng arkd ZoAing Dept. Ch -, of Sout:'t Miami 613E Sunset Dr. So' uthMiaru, Florida 33143 RE: Hope. --v, the -an Church Zoning Application for Rooftop Antenna's 6330 SW 40 ' Street South Miami, F133155 To Whom It May Concern: Please accept this letter for the above referenced job site on behalf of Metro PCs. Metro PCs would life to be on, the next available agenda at the City of South N'Tiu.ii, For the approval of cellular, rooftop antennas. Metro PCs is a new company in'�he'stwte of Florida; and is very excited to conduct business in the City of South Miami. Thy Hope Lutheran Church is in the prime location for the objective Metre PCs is lookint.nr servicing the City of South Miami, and the on going surrounding traffic in tY,e 4�e" -1.We are proposing to mount the antennas on side of the roof of the Hope Lutheran. Cara ch, and painting the antennas to match the exterior color of the building. This type or' '. installation is considered to be a stealth installation, which will not be visible frUm`,he surroutoding streets. Metro PCs is willing to cooperate with the City in any capacity to receive a fair and expeditious approval. We thank you for your tune and patients in this matter and hope to hear from yov soon. Sincerely, Mic l J. 'do Zo g Proj t Manager Metr PCS =`szr ,�3�a�...a.. •. a 'z'. „ ..,s City of South Miami Planning & Zoning Department v City Hall, 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida 33143 Telephone: (305) 663 - 6326;, Fax: (305) 666 -4591 Application For Public Hearing Before Planning Board & City Commission Address o' 3ua act Pro ercy: � � Lot s) Block Subdivision PB kee�s & Bounds,— — JApplLcant: Phone: Representai;ve:de� Organization: Address: Phone r-rupprty Owner:b� �� Signature: TL F Noiling Address: Phone: �ANchiiect/Engineer: Phone: AS THE APPLICANT, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO THIS PROJECT: Owner _Owner's Representative _Contract to purchase _Option to purchase eTenantILessee APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE FOR THE FOLLOWING: SUBMITTED MATERIALS PLEASE CHECK THE APPROPRIATE ITEM: PL ASE CHECK ALL ' yF.l APPLY: _ Text Amendment to LDC --Vari ce 'Letter of intent _Zoning Map Amendment _Special Use -&-Justificationc for changes _ PUD Approval _Special Exception �- Statement of hardship _PUD Major Change _Other _ Proof of ownersNp ur letter fron, owe —Power of attorney, -d Briefly explain application and cite specific Code sections: °=-- Contract to purr.cce current survey (1 original sealed and !� 1 � Al vi signed /1 reduced copy ,n 11" „.1.7 ") a _ 15 copies of Si +e ole r. and Floor Plana i D 3 � 1 reduced copy @ I 1 x 17" _ 20% Property owner signatures Section: Subsection: Page #: Amended Date: _�/ Mailing labels (3, sets) and map ZRequired Fee(s),' The undersi a d this c m a plication and represents that the information and all submitted materials are true and correct to est f t apple t' 1 dge and belief. Applica s S gna a Da Upon r ceipt, lications an all submitted ma'eriais will be reviewed tot: (ioriohance with the Land Development Code and other applicable regu ations. A cations found Rio± ;n comp;'.ai,ce wili `ue`rejected and returned to the applicant.' EDateFiled, USE ONLY: Date of FR'HearingDate of Com mission uired PeJtion Acccepted ayment _ 8/2/00 Z r Q 0 3 d V 0 5 O.NV l OQz mw ¢ 3 aSW— ul Z oar-o 'p Z:, o I KwZ`� J r 4 am¢ ¢ m �{^ x(.000 t0 Z N ny O¢ Zwe . z¢ r r G Q I. mm p W.. `1-F- �I wa� 4�trdrca �N ZK m!� O.�D IQ 003 _- ��dp ILU L� H� Z �� >7i d '� 1�} 'OE !i NaU Qi zOZO NI. riy '�. y ? L�i,��dc v �Oo- WO 3 :tea o; fI .z'oa OW o W, iW v, 0 O IZit F J 11 w W 1 I I Z I U OI ui W8K11� Z (� Z J z.5 'f V O W U .J.. iJ0 — - W W m.:< II Z z � p J J IL o z o lop r.. �I IZ `aZ vI �I 10 '1 o OI to ZI. IJ ¢I W vl al pl Ip J Z JI IJ W w. p N In -.\p Q IQ t Q a Q In vJ _m 'of .Z Q ul Y.. i C I I ? I s I I I Q Z U f ✓2O } I N �< Z I NJ� N,ZN o_ z a IL Q r , -""?v ,r;�''°'',_ � Y.":r?� _vcr .>i"'`r5r�;�t�,.., „ , ,'7�'„-¢c^ ,— '�,,,' �: G x.-a*k..ru+�•��n°>?;�;ax.. .,� .. _ .*s -.-� ' ,. �, ;;z,,: ;. s'�€,�.�T .,.. w-�. tom-- �,'""rv, Vii^+. r'€'*�.i � , r C) Ul (O vwcz OOZ Oa�w a�Q _ z o O I ON. p s co J v W IdP ..� �. W .ira �:U. Qs;j a: 0 CD oaz�� oz Q l Q a-W I sl I u� S,S4, y ltn < ;lli �:Q I p W I(O IN i I \VV I Pp a.I I/, 1 ♦`1} �`43 OIL O.I� \ ELI O.,J of Iw DI[if HOD I P717" Power of Attorney T UNDERSIGNED, do by these presents hereby make, constitute and appoint Metro PCS, and Michael Mejido of the City of South Miami and the State of Florida, true and lawful Attorney -in -fact for me and in my name, place, stead, to sign on my behalf, and do all acts necessary, including speak at a public hearing in furtherance of an application of public hearing No. with the City of South Miami for a hearing before the City Council. Reference Subject Properly: Hope Lutheran Church 6334 SW 4& Street South Miami, Fl 33155 Granting and giving unto said Attorney -in -fact, full authority and power to do and perform, any and all that is necessary or incident to the performance and execution of the powers herein above expressly granted, with power to do and perform all acts authorized hereby, as fully to all intents and purposes as the grantor might or could do if personally_ present, with full power of substitution. Signed, witnessed, executed and acknowledged on this L�t_ day of 49z L ,' Aoz WrrNESSEI7 Dame of Corporatism Signature 633c sii G;n r4n d'qw-t5 Address Print name -- 1--s-iiX4 ture President or Vice President Print name State of Florida City of South Miami, County of Dade The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by A tre L �a') the of corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He/ She is personally known to me or has produced IC-ho as identification. Witness my signature and official seal this ig day of 003 in the State of aforesaid. Coun ty and Sta My Commission Expires j Norarty Public -State FANJN Adams Of ° My CWMV M outer Print Name k s U August 08,2W i 04/14/2003 -12:23 FAX IM 002 ~ �1'i•M s7.�� NMW i QOM! f. 4i /Me�w��w�.rrUe ': Wbiyt Wads of, ,. b. lk- mom lama cow slow .� erdtw:ni s ammem i.im b as swe 1 nwwhk pww M as Am pat. mod ' gn 3t"iBis Me Cr k-M wt SW Mato, atdsed and' at lips= rm "' lies9aesp a Diced . E�is�a„Yrae �o�ievRx'8,' labs�rf s Farr-.,- ore.. sai®i peue nw, •. <, �, 'lial tba astd pai4af fir fist ppi.' Gr asid is ats�iisatlet at 8e a. it ; fasr Cool mnF ifatvmle Catisidet'+s: i iM r ... &-mook No a is bald I"&&? do a" ps I-- or *a --i pnt As i. M►ab, m&=*w$4oA i eet aaM sa tw pata� -- slow w wi pao- . �=- �fsaad w.ie.a ras +ae. 60 tenrrwR duMMI.i Md dmmW *lMs ANA bsrt it dus r�l si✓ t ft s" K Ftasidsr tswils .f s AU of JoA n acrd jao ,p am@& the cast. $.61 teet eiversot,` x } ' in a7aQ1C xs:r aaeolYlittd to the plet. e' ! ttstra s, reowdeo•i:. Mat 3:00': 32, at bits 28, of the Nblxo zads 1 ad tM rid pn4 ai tie rise pas 400 4steks irtb +ompost rid this to said b":md well Mma did v opown be bum dma At an rumno wbeft"WAL IN MiT1Ha womw. da 4d&-PM of Ma the pen bas sawed dw- psr == maw a 9OP AMOR +ate •. ATUMWa 1 1 is .si pac maw ad ilial " in rwwewm� of ...•� �•.: .. ,.. t• ... ,... .r a .i..y 1 .T.',"..; .. r.:",'.' .;°f°a°?Mr^,'.z"^';cJ`^s;, =c '04/14/2003 12:24 FAX 9 003 I �~ l Ni>siYi.: -''. -r i4 d flatai�IC A R itig <,clw ae ! �a1oi,����� a;asis+aaeal 3Mnitw- -spool* d 4 1i1R �4 ii..�.. 4a *}ioo►M�l� .�V aaM 1`ulsl.s �! ins ai a�a� ilr loll dilml !N Ger a Ns ANA r rd %t dr aaor soil aiioein aY1Ml��i aaa� aide aI M� � 14A��..1//�. i� alrt $1�1: M>� � or! � IL+i�� wa�N�wO• � ' R'11 —Abe" rr• i i .• aYi $ L q9 E ' a R ra s. s AM ` pie M. PEE Z � Fez i : 4, Yrv, 04/14/2003 12:27 FAX 9 005 M.'a +�'S,�d Z.�•Js (�,,�'4yM yz•� �'S? <�!t'N} �i y r iJ R ,fig ''4��.,s' •'Y t �t' • i i i•L'� y7 �� e i •. "'� . � . ••4k3 .! •\ f Vii.. r7 ' J�•{ .\* ��I. ++w i I 1 e gi 60�A ON c. -°- �:,,• ��rs: s.. xY-., ?^�a4'.*.::;.'= �,..:�°"L`�3."3. ..a ,. r.., r,^�i ^. x, ri ^�;• -�'— ;'u :; �°a�., wr s. ;�z:..,�� ,� ,`-�"s. xx- ,`a....ro� »l .,. swsoo , &, t..: i° 04/14/2003 12:25 FAX Ij 004 €OOZ /i i 7 :i a shy' 4010 =NMI P-04 dm UKW alm w it NWVAT �i�s'� ani � it dN Eiis�+pl +%-• ': •Dols 36 Za 3s ha S+ 4 7o Bp 9s ]Oa "a Aa 35 Md )Sy in 3ioalr gil of IND low womi. Wd-tft to aw pba tbes'"Op reaosded is na skik 29, as lm!'•Pba of ae Pd asm Reoeeft of Doe cumva ; i Su%jm to the roWaCWPW, UVAUU*w Md OeoO weft or noord, - filed tMW fib* 90 74M L4O nad • !t YOM � And 6w mIA iW et it Om ra Sm bwft ft* waarr do ddrM ww taut and wN & io4 dia aat� api.R iw Iaraal; alaiq d �t satyr w Si WIIIiw 0 dowl . dw S" lW!tdra Bye So" Ira arwi Ifs Prw �. r�ap�q°•p " iwa�wwMS "j ms AY c M--- 09 -T :said ljoi sn lie:) � Bulddl4S suinjo -d � A3enuAd'g AlPnaaS- suoll!pu®3'$ SLUJOI AV Z �o a��d iuoa cow ' JO B �anag s lo��ia�u�a autA i�Ut' . .: - FY�� ;,,,,M.,..�'.�;'"'-- �„�`�"'2�r .."�"r ";'".,,'�,., i"�; . ,,x..: �",z. =,,, v .1 =�; ,., -.. „ ,, .spa, ,,x <,n ;,r-�- -� ,, ,:z�f�;ca.�i,�z: .. ti. .a ..7�^'�r'�,"' ��,*�- ��'.,� ...�,`ra���'°°*nr •,,,,. N 9\ . \ CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING BOARD Regular Meeting Action Summary Minutes Tuesday, May 13, 2003 City Commission Chambers 7:30 P.M. _PB -03 -011 Applicant : Metro PCS, Inc. Location: 6330 SW 40th Street Request: A RESOLUTION OF THE 'MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY, OF SOUTH MIAMI, RELATING TO A`REQUEST PURSUANT TO SECTION 20 -10.6 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR A SPECIAL USE APPROVAL TO ,PLACE A STEALTH CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY- ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6330 S.W. 40TH ST.(BIRD RD) WITHIN THE "PI' PUBLIC / INSTITUTIONAL ZONING DISTRICT Applicant: Michael Mejido` Action: Ms. Yates read the item into the record and staff presented the request: The applicant is requesting approval to place a cellular communications facility on property owned by Hope Lutheran Church, located at 6330 SW 40a` St. (Bird Rd.). The facility will consist of four small antennas mounted at the roofline of the main sanctuary building. The equipment associated with these antennas will be located indoors, in an office area of the church. The antennas will be mounted on the side walls of the church building, just below the highest point of the roof. The antennas will be painted the same color as the church building, and will be nearly invisible from the surrounding area. A previous telecommunications antenna was approved for this location in 2000. The existing antenna is located in a cross structure mounted on the church. However, there is no ability for co- location within the cross structure, requiring the need for these proposed stealth antennas: Staff is recommending approval of the proposal based on the following observations: 1) The size of the of the antennas being located at the roof line of the sanctuary will not distract from the architectural style of the building. 2) The proposed use is compatible architecturally with the building on which it is being located and will not adversely impact surrounding properties. Motion: Ms: Yates moved to approve the proposal as presented and Mr. Comendeiro seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes 5 Nays , 0 K:\PB\PB Minutes\2003 Minutes\MINS 5 -13 -03 (exerpt).doc _.. t?. ...,''"h?'t°.^- hfl ,- � a: x"� � �, �• 1 4 � L ytk x xw�f� � Yr^ {gyp be "^a,.y'^i "30 Buz' VU- 34w UP r1 REB "°fir eiiri of r P�oin nissron F# e f o h_ ramt,, o..`„ rii cbnlurPUbadNleanr9inYi r #strequlazGrt iami�sbe 51 4 y 61 i uUn$ei DnlreaYi7CanSltlBr���xv a ��K ' a,f � ��*�y�l� RESOLU'TIOl�i QF- �TWE�MP�YOR�� � ��Y'�C�QM111i15SCQ'OF��H� E` lT�y�Q�� 4 + p E lur to T�Q Na o o 1 � iuet oP - w TH i�CiQ ANDS ECilQ l =2$ E CQUNMY, CQDEr a , '�` �RS�PERTY;'' Q#',ATE6il' a'�H S�i�` r8'EMi�E5T1�TE�f����t�ENTfAL "� >3 42ADr T 5245 SII6�3R Gf?lRTs e1T IVII �FGiIIF�FS�'A�iS155 r� BQNDifiIOEU CTiiihf � OE Tk{E C DE C `2 iD s t `BEC�Af��7ESCRIPTION,����iD� PTFIEAi�iETEfEL(PirAEN�Q �A F- PEGJdG USE APPF{OiIAL T9 sia _� `, �P � C�`xxA�r'STEALT�I C�LLULi4R�CCSMMUIVICATIONS '�FACILIT,if� f�QN�sa� : x r�tr ;pU��1 ST�TUTlAIk NI`G'�STT�PRQ�I�IGAIi`%ETIUE�� Rol irr�urria Ponbe rrig'x s h�o�l �tlrr , � �e"the��a mrPg�epa eNil goo rAi~ LrnYc�sfedartresare, nv�Yec� ,tQatten���ncl�rilbehear��r �°��;� � ��rr� �' S t a '��it i- ".4 .;•_ c �S J; � `"C i � xs �j Rf ryf 1 E "i sFPUrsuaiit'ta Florida S #mutes =2r8�1 ��he�r�ya�e.�?� ��a pubic that if a p ®rSorR°"decPtl�� s� r�, w� � #��a�ps��Hany tlectsion�rtiade�b�i�t�fs Bo'�Ydµ pageli" °�"a ar�lm(ssidsn 4Yifd resp�ci to any fnatY�rn , r ,k� c aoris5ct�tedatrt� MeeSmg or�kteanngtyhe�Qr�sh'ewyill� ,'edrapreaord q�tfte +pmc�edtn9s�srtd+th�it��r+P �� � �� � � �,' � �stich pri p4 ek a#ie d eYSnrt irb�/ rteetl to nsGl g a a uer a �epoa a e ea�roee dl�g� r xy �t na�eu�h��i�YecoC�a�c���es�el e §f��fiyan�i�c���g'N+`"NF��g�� p -a Hope Lutheran Church View of east face looking west before antenna installation. View of east face looking west after antenna installation. MFJ KiimleyHorn = and Associates, Inc. �rt �II a Y a a� 0 on 0 0 a� U cHO ^ � h� O II� i�l L/} 'C Cii 0 Sc� Q Cd G pro- Cd �1 C�.dy 0 yamy.,D^ �+4I •N 0 0 PN G IU T�yy �.i �o�y �I 0 3 a Y a a� 0 on 0 0 a� U cHO ^ � h� O II� j LJ I I Antenna Installation Visual Impact Analysis Hope Lutheran Church 6330 SW 40t' ST South Miami, FL 33155 Prepared For: MetroPCS Prepared By: F-] L Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Soup South Miami ° AR -Arne icaft F " CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI • 1427 +ncoeeo.. entEO 2001 TO: Honorable Mayor, Vice Mayor DATE: ,July29, 2003 & City Commission FROM: Maria V. Davis js' AGENDA ITEM No City Manager RE: 2003 /2004 Proposed Budget= RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE CITY'S 2003/2004 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET; ADVISING THE MIAMI -DADS COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER OF ITS PROPOSED MILLAGE RATE OF MILLS; ITS ROLL -BACK RATE OF 5.832 MILLS AND ANNOUNCING THE DATES OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE PROPOSED MILLATE RATE AND TENTATIVE BUDGET; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS The attached resolution relates to the 2003/2004 fiscal year budget. It is submitted to seek the Commission's approval for the tentative millage rate that the Finance Department must forward to the Miami -Dade County Property Appraiser's office to support our 2003 /2004 fiscal year budget. This year, in accordance with Florida State Statutes, the deadline for the City to inform the Property Appraiser of its proposed millage is August 4, 2003. The tentative millage rate to be approved on the resolution represents the possible maximum property tax rate, not the actual Late,, that the City may levy next fiscal year. The final millage rate will be determined after deliberations and approval of the budget by the City Commission in September. State law allows the final millage rate to be reduced to a lower rate than the approved tentative millage; however, it cannot be raised without engaging in extremely cumbersome procedures. For this reason, I urge the City Commission to approve a flexible rate that will allow Administration to adjust funding levels in the event that the Commission wishes to include funding for a project, service or position that was not anticipated. I reiterate that the final millage rate can only be lowered, not raised, after the budget workshops in September. Therefore, it is prudent to allow some flexibility when proposing the millage rate. Time has not permitted me to finish writing a complete budget message, therefore, I am submitting the attached preliminary budgets for your consideration and review. I will forward a more detailed formal budget to you by next Friday. In light of the anticipated $1.4 million dollar deficit for fiscal year 2003/04, I have met with the Department Heads to determine the basis of their budget requests, and prepared two budgets, which reflect different levels of service. The first budget is based on a tax rate of 7.323 mills, per $1,000 of assessed property valuation to support a proposed budget of $13,382,865. This represents an increase of $435,845 over the current year's projected expenditure total. In millage terms, the expenditure increase equates to .542 mills of next year's assessment. The second budget is based on a millage rate of 7.823 mills per $1,000 of assessed property valuation for a budget of $13,,631.768. The difference between the total of proposed expenditures in the second budget and the current year's projection is $814,7489 representing an increase of 1.01 mills. We are able to achieve this minimal increase in millage by significantly streamlining City operations, while complying with the provisions of our two bargaining unit contracts (AFSCME and PBA) that have monetary impact. In accordance with provisions of the union contracts, I' have included over $200,000 to fund contract mandated cost of living increases for the members of the two unions. The PBA increase is two percent (2 %) over current wages plus an increase in Hazard Duty pay, and AFSCME's increase is three and half percent (3.5 %). The City customarily utilizes AFSCME's cost of living increase as a basis for all other non -union employees. I have followed this practice in the proposed budget. The budget does, not include merit increases for any group of employees. I realize that this is the second year that the City has not awarded merit increases to its eligible employees; however, it is my belief that our financial condition will improve significantly in the upcoming year to be able to recommend merit increases in the future. Funding is provided for medical insurance coverage for all full time employees at a fixed cost level for HMO coverage, utilizing the initial quotes received from our current health insurance carrier, with the assumption that the City' bears, one hundred percent (100 %) of the cost. The proposal includes the option for employees to upgrade coverage and pay for the additional: cost. I believe that this is 'a fair and equitable way to obtain cost savings and not burden our employees with the sharing of health insurance costs with the City.,. The net savings for taking this approach in lieu of the current practice of paying for one hundred percent (100 %) of the cost of any plan selected by the employees is over $60,000. The budget includes four Refuse Collector positions budgeted for only half of the fiscal year in anticipation of instituting a new automated method of garbage collection. The plan is to shift the affected employees to other vacant positions with the same' skill-level requirements. The efficiency of automated equipment allows for the elimination of four full time positions on a recurring basis. It also dramatically reduces the level of workers' compensation injuries. This proposal involves the lease /purchase of two automated garbage trucks "one -arm bandit" and acquisition of garbage containers for each residence in the City. I have included the funds to lease the new automated trucks for five years, in lieu of replacing our existing model of garbage trucks with the same kind of equipment. The cost of the containers will be borne by the taxpayers at an estimated unit cost of $50. 2 "`"s* „ ;,::'«?.- """"BF n— �.m-7m° w, Lastly, an extensive amount of time and effort was spent with City Staff to creatively streamline operations for significant cost reductions utilizing sound business, operational and fiscal practices. In addition to non- salary line item expense reductions, some position functions have been consolidated and/or out - sourced. Mechanizing the solid waste collection operation will create substantial recurring savings. Salary adjustments for certain executive positions are also proposed. All Administrative take home cars' have been eliminated and will be utilized as pool cars. There are a number of positions proposed for elimination. The number of positions to be eliminated depends on which of the proposed millage rates the City Commission approves. If the City Commission approves an increase of 1.5 mills, there will be a total of 10.5 positions eliminated from the budget. Five of those 10.5 positions are currently 'vacant. If the Commission approves mechanizing the solid waste collection operation, the total number of positions to be eliminated is 14.5. Further if an increase of 1.5 mills is approved, an approximate $100,000 surplus can be utilized` to increase the contingency fund to $200,000, or it can be utilized to begin restoring the cash reserves fund. On the other hand, if the Commission approves a millage increase of only 1 mill, then a total of 13.5 positions will be eliminated from the City work force. Again, five of those 13.5 positions are vacant. If the solid waste collection operation proposal is approved, the total number of positions to be eliminated is 17.5. I am of the opinion that the proposed millage 'increase combined with the numerous cost containment measures outlined above 'will '' place the City back on firm fiscal ground. Additionally, the proposed restructuring of the departments will provide for a much more cost effective and efficient City government. Finally, given my brief tenure with the City, I am confident that additional recommendations will be forthcoming, as I am able to further analyze departmental operations accordingly. RECOMMENDATION: To provide the City some flexibility in the event of an unforeseen situation that:!, might occur between now and the time of the approval of the final budget, I recommend that ` the City Commission tentatively adopt a millage rate of 1.5 mills. The final millage rate for next fiscal year will be determined later in September. I've attached two spreadsheets, which illustrate the tax impact at the rates of '1 and 1.5 mills increase on single family homes. Attachment 3 -1 p x a W tsi�na�rs�40 ift 40 4040inin40rs% oil V��-fA4A4+ cm CACnAAAAww0 W N N N N �� CO) p CA m p M C -•<A� Cn N O V o N O V N N 0-4 Cn N O v t)1 N O V N CO) p N tr 0 rn O <)i �O N O �Cn O Vi O Cil O Cif O cn O Cn O in O Cn O CO) CO) m Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 o O o o c O o °0 3 N - r 0 0 0 0 0io 0 0 0 0'0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "o m z Om rn C m N r c z m Ni x n T o M -I " AtoIntotoEAEA40EA4 040fAEf,fAVAEAtototoEAEA N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N `3 m m 'v Z > m w Cn Cn N W W Cn Cn Cn Cif t)t Cn t7t q1 t)f Cn Cif rr Cn Cn y STD G) Z O O o0000000000000000000o pm -� p 4& 0 W )1 '0 " 0 -4 n W" Wt 4 JP W O W W A N 111 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z G z v co) >C O z ® n � c EA to if, to iA <A to 46 EA 40 EA EA 46 EA ow vw EA EA <A VA EA y� 3: m m D %<CO) Zq �� -.��- - �00000000000000 <A fA EA m c a rncNoo- (n 0l0n0Ul00Ul0Ul0(0Cnn - C0U_ 000:0 v3m ax `3® � 3 p " °A0 0000000000 oo o0000000000000000000o nIn oo000O00000000o0000OO m z' On® -zi z m p� x n M n cn m �( EA to EA to EA EA <A to to EA EA fA 4A to to W W N N N N N N " " "" � M 0 a C m m CO) �W 2 z in AoN0)0a,(DW V �CnCOW V �NCOW V -t)1 'tD "� -4 CO) 2'3 01 V V 00 CD O Cn W. O V V 00 W O � 0 m x a m- n T' rn M W v ;a a -i CO) > v) z m fn m -1 EA to EA to to <A Efl tf1 to "fA to tf1 to to to ww�W WwNNivNN;,N.A. 'po V p DC n Z O m0� �, M _ m -A W 01 0 W W V 0 W N O W 0 A N '-+ W V 0 W� O N V' �� _ � r W -I (n V w0"W'A01MW N40- 4W0NW0MW sVNo4 W0 - +01NwWtDoO'01N`4 WW4 m W 0 $,mom "i1 in -D1 0 a 3 m CO) ?SCI _ P m M D Zp E a c �' axmMcz z 1 a �O mzc N <A <A EA to 40 EA EA to EA VA <A to EA EA to EA EA VW t7t O A A A A W W W W N N N N a a {A dq m -O CO) (n a -1 ®� r N O V 0 N'0 V 0 N 0 -4 N N O V W N O V 0 N Cn O Cn O Cn 'O N O to O Cn O an O `O Cn O O O m Mn N tr 0 m CA v rn X can az3C 'v Z m:0 m rn � z-I 40 EA 411.40 to EA to 60 tbm EA to fA Vf <A ow � fA AA A W W W W .NNNN — -ti -+ - -- rA6orArA m m ® N 4& 0 W )1 '0 " 0 -4 n W" Wt 4 JP W O W W A N p m 0� 3 z ® n � c EA to if, to iA <A to 46 EA 40 EA EA 46 EA ow vw EA EA <A VA EA y� 3: m m D %<CO) Zq �� -.��- - �00000000000000 > AG1tG1iN��CiDWM-401C1ir1 P +G1 ivIN -•O A V W 010 W m 0 CO) O O Q1tDNOONOO A V -Ph -4 p m f „'.'"�' ��.,.. ' .-�,. �„- .�?_:"��3= :'�'�?�'�: , ,e�; .' r.�:�, �- °„a°�,f,°�" � , x, w.:,, 3;r°r�.'.."�'T °''�, ;�;- ea"�,"� `� 'F��z�,Tr�.'�.`�°.`,�±,. ;a':s „��.r,"�. � e.,,k g',r z RESOLUTION NUMBER: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE CITY'S 2003/2004 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET; ADVISING THE MIAMI -DADE COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER OF ITS` PROPOSED MILLAGE RATE OF MILLS; ITS' ROLL -BACK RATE OF 5.832 MILLS AND ANNOUNCING THE DATES OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ,;PROPOSED MILLATE RATE AND TENTATIVE BUDGET; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Florida Statute 200.065 requires; (1) that within 35 days of Certificate of Value; (2) "each taxing authority shall advise the property appraiser of its proposed millage rate, of it rolled -back rate computed pursuant to sub- section; (3) and of the date, time and place which a public hearing will be held to consider the proposed millage rate and tentative budget ' ; and WHEREAS, the Certification of Value was made on July 1, 2003; and WHEREAS, the City Administration has computed the proposed millage rate and the rolled -back rate; and WHEREAS, the Mayor, and City Commission wish to comply with the aforesaid Statute. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That the City Administration advises the property appraiser that the proposed millage rate of City of South Miami, Florida for the 2003 /2004 fiscal year budget is mills. The rolled -back rate computed pursuant to sub - section (1) if Florida Statute 200.065 is 5.832 mills. Section 2. That date, time and place at which public' hearing shall be held to consider the proposed millage rate are as follows: 1. First Budget Hearing- September 9, 2003 at 7:30 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida. 2. Second Budget Hearing -, September 23, 2003 at 7:30 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of July 2003. ATTEST: APPROVED: CITY CLERK MAYOR COMMISSION VOTE: READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mayor Feliu Vice Mayor Russell: Commissioner McCrea: Commissioner Bethel: Commissioner Wiscombe: CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED REVENUES` A B E F K L 1 GENERAL FUND - 001 _ 2 OBJE_C_T CODE -0000 3 REVENUE CODE - 03 - -_ - - 4 CITY 5 -+--ACTUAL ADOPTED DEPARTMENT'S------M--A --- NAGER'S s ACCT. ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION REVENUES REVENUES REQUESTS RECOMMENDATIONS 7 NO. 2001 -2002 2002 -2003 2003 -2004 2003 -2004 9 19.10 -00 AD VALOREMTAX_ES $4,520,843 $4,742,490 $5,187,779 $5,927,165 10 _ 11.20 -00 _ DELINQUENT;TAXES' 86,518 45,000 - 45,000 11 11.21 -00 _ PENALTIES & INTEREST 3,051 50,000 _45,000 25,000 25,000' 13 - TOTAL AD VALOREM TAXES _$4,610,412 $4,837,490 $5,257,779 $5,997,165 14 15 FRANCHISE TAXES - 1s 17 18 13.10-00 93.20 -00 13.40 -00 _ ELECTRICITY TELEP_ HONE _ GAS $714,063 0 16,528 $675,00 0 18,000 $680,000 0 18_,000 $680,000 0 18,00.0 19 13.50 -00 _ CABLE T V FRANCHISE 0 _ _ 21 TOTAL FRANCHISE TAXES $730,591 $693,000 $698,000 $698,000 22 23 UTILITY TAX - - _ - 24 - 1410 -00 - - - -- tELECTRICITY_ - _ I - -_ $886,644 $875,000; $870_,000 - $870,000 25 14.20 -00 TELEPHONE - 01 0 0 26 27 14.30- OOATER 14.40 -00 _ GAS t +- 100,604 30,141 29,000 95,000 27,500 95,000 27,500 29 30 _ TOTAL UTILITY TAXES _ _ -_ $1,017,390 � $1,014,000_: $992,500 -- - _ - $992,500 31 _COMMUNICATION SERVICES TAX - -- 32 15.00 -00 ,UNIFIED COMM SERVICES TAX $762,339 $675,00 $675,000 _ $675,000 33 34 TOTAL COMMUNICATION TAX $762,339 1 $675,000 $675,000 $675,000 35 _ - - - 36 - f LICENSES & PERMITS OCCUPATIONAL 37 21.10 -00 LICENSE _ $313,581_ $325,000 $325,000 $325,000 38 21.20-00 OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE -NEW _- 38,501 45,000 4_0,000 39 2130-00 LOBBYIST REGISTRATION FEE 2,750 _ 5,000 _40,000 11500 1,500 4o 2210 -00 1 BUILDING PERMITS 329,520 375,0001 400,000 820,000 411 29.10 -00 PENALTIES ON OCC LICENSE 10,075 139000 10,000 10,000 42 29.20 -00 TOWING LICENSING FEE 0 0 0 0 44 TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS $694,429 $763,000. $776,500 $996,500 45 46 STATE SHARED TAXES 47 35.10 -12 ` I REVENUE SHARING _ $301,982 $292,982 $299,000 $299,000 48 35.10 -15 1BEVERAGE LICENSE! 15,016 15,000 12,500 12,500 49 35.10 -18 1/2 CENT SALES TAX_ 625,041 625,000 -,1 620,000 620,000 50 36.49-20 LOCAL OPTION GAS TAX 198,522 200,000 -- - _ 196,000 196,000 51 52 - _ �-- '- - - - TTOTAL STATE SHARED TAXES _ - $1,140,561 $1,132,982 $1,127,500 - $1,127,500 53 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER - _ - - -- CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED REVENUES A I B E F K L 54 GENERAL FUND - 01 55 OBJECT CODE - 0000 56 REVENUE CODE - 03 - -- -- -CITY 57 - 58 ACTUAL ADOPTED DEPARTMENT'S MANAGER'S 59 ACCT. ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION REVENUES REVENUES RECOMMENDATIONS 60 NO.- 2001 -200 2002 -2003 _REQUESTS_ 2003 -2004 2003-2004 61 62 COUNTY REVENUE, 63 38.20 -00 SHARE OF CTY OCC. LICENSE $22,014 $16,500 $17,000 $17,000 64 s5 TOTAL COUNTY REVENUE $22,014 r -- -- - -- $16,500 $17,000 $17,000 -- - - - -- - - -- 67 GENERAL CHARGES 68 41.20 -00 (ZONING HEARING FEES $16,800 _ $9,000 $1 2,000 $12,000 69 41.30-00 , ENV REV &PRESV BR FEE 14,195 _ 12,000 - 12,000 - 12,000 7o 41.40 -00 MICROFILM SALES 3,355 3,500 4,000 4,000 71 41.90 -10 B & Z REINSPECTION FEES ; 5,660 91000 ` 4,000 4,000 72 4146-40 41.90-30 QU_ALIF FEES- ELECTIONS OF USE/OCCUPANCY 1,040 19,975 _ _�0 45,000 _ _ 0 20,000 0 73 hCERT. 20,000 74 41.90 -40 CODE ENFORCEMENT FINES 158,877 80,000' - 60,000 - 60,000 _ 76 TOTAL GENERAL CHARGES $219,903 $158,500 $112,000 $112,000 -- 78 PUBLIC SAFETY - 79 _ 42.10 -10 POLICE SERVICES _ 57,681 _ < $56,000 $45,000 _- - - $45,000 - 81 82 TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY $571681 $50,000 $45,000 ' $45,000 83 PHYSICAL CHARGES - - - - -- - -- - - 841 _ _ 43.41 -00 SOLID WASTE CHARGES $7,282 $15,000 _ _ $5,000 $5,000 85 3.41-50_ 41-4140- SOLID WASTE SURCHARGE " 59,000 0 ; 0 _ 0 86 87 43 42 -00 +CNTY HAULERS PERMIT FEES 172,811 _ 170,000 _ 250,000 -- - 250,000 ss 'TOTAL PHYSICAL CHARGES $239,093 $185,000 - $255,000 $255,000 901 PARKING SYSTEM- 911 44.51 -00 PERMITS $53,200 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 921 44.52 -00 METER FRANCHISE FEES 701,743 1,134,000 1,100,000 _ 1,100,000 931 44.52 -10 ` VALET PARKING 15,695 14,000 14,000 - --- - - - - -- 14,000 941 44.53 -00 VIOLATIONS COLLECTIONS 468,0611 500,000 5001000 500,000 95 44.54 -00 PARKING METER CASH KEY t 10,412 10,00 15,000 15,000 96 97 _ GROS_S PARKING REVENUE less parking contract fee $1,249,111 0 $1,703,000 $1,674,000 $1,674,000 98 _ (199,820) (199,820) _ (210,000) 100 - NET PARKING REVENUE - $1,249,111 $1,503,180 $1,474,180 $1,464,000 0--_. 101 -- - -- - 102 RECREATION FEES -- -- - -- 1031 47.26 -01 TENNIS MEMBERSHIPS -RES. $6751 $700 ` $700 $700 104 47.26 -10 ;TENNIS MEMBERSHIP- NON -RES. 7,562(_ 91000 7,500 7,500 105 .47.26 -20 �T COURT FEES 15,087 16,000 14,000 14,000 106 107 47.26 -30 47.26 -60 RECREATION FEES > CONCESSION STANDS 29,815 0� _ 25,000 0 50,000 0 _5.0,000 0 108 _ 109 LTOTAL 'RECREATION FEES $53,139 $50,700} $72,200 $__72_,20.0 110 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED REVENUES PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.373 MILLS -1 MILL INCREASE A B E F K L 111 GENERAL FUND - 01 112 OBJECT CODE - - 0000 3 113 REVENUE CODE - 03 - 114 - - -� - _ CITY - -- 115 ACTU_AL ADOPTED DEPARTMENT'S MANAGER'S 116 ACCT. ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION REVENUES_3 u REVENUES REQUESTS 2003 RECOMMENDATIONS'. 20.0.3 117 NO. _ -A_ 2001 -2002 2002 -2003 -2004 -20.04 118 - - - -- - 119 _ FINES & FORFEITURES 120 51.12 -00 > METRO COURT FINES :_$200,420 $225,000 $200,000 $200,000 121 ' 54.10 -00 BURGLAR ALARM FINES ®STR 145,000 40,000 40,000 122 54.10 -50 ALARM_ REGISTRATION FEES _37,805 0 2 _ 0 60,000 6_0,000 123 -- - - - - 124 -- - - TOTAL FINES & FORFEITURES - $238,225 $370,000 - - $300,000 - - - -- - $300,000 - 125 - 126 127 61.20 -00 RENTS & INTEREST INTEREST INCOME - -- ' $110`243 $150,00 $45 000 -_ _: $45,000 129 62.20 -00 - - RENT- FASCELL PARK 10,517 _._ 25,000 12,000 - - - -- 12,000 1291 62.21 -00 iINSPECTION STATION 24,000 24,000'1 "24,000 24,000 13o 6_2.30 -003 BUS BENCH ADS _ 7,745 9,000' 8,500 _ 81500` 131 62.50 -00 :TRENT- C.A.A. _ _ 22_,000 22,000' 22,000 22,000 132 133 62 75 -00 62_90 -00 : T -SOUTH MIAMI FIELD RENTS MIA -INT'L BASEBALL ACAD' 1_5,915 _ 5,842_ 16,000 ` 3,000 16,000 _ 7,500 16,000 7,500 134 135 rTOTAL RENTS & INTEREST $196,262 - - -- $249,000 _ _ $135,000 $1.35,000 136 137 138 139 - 6_6.90 -00 69.30 -00 SALES & REIMBURSEMENT HOSPITAL LANDSCAPE REFUND PRIOR YR'S EXP. _ $30,000 110,788 -- $_30,0001 0 $309000 0 $30,000 0 14o 141 69.36-00.J 69.45 -00 EFRIOR YEAR'S REVENUE PROCEEDS OF HOSPITAL FINANCE 5,711 0 _ 0 150,000 _ 0 0 0 0 142 143 69.50 -00 69.52 -00 ` RE 3 - WORKERS'COMP. REIMBSMNT- POLICE LABOR 14,820 13,756 _ 0 _ _ 0 _ 0 0 0 0 144 145 69.53 -00 69.54 -00 REIMBSMNT- BUILDING LABOR REIMBSMNT -PUB WORKS LABOR 0 14,9461 0 0 0 0 0 0 146 69.60 -00 ` REIMBS_MNT -PARKS LABOR' - 0 0 0 0 147 69.61 -00 REIMBSMNT- FINANCE LABOR _ 0 0 ` 0 148 69.92 -01 MISCELLANEOUS- OTHERS 16,913 75,000 25,000 25,000 149 69.92 -20 GRANT ADMINISTRATN -REIMB 131,628 75,000 60,000 60,000 1501 69.92 -25 SUNSET DR MTCE -FDOT REIMB 11,074 11,000, 11,000 _ 11,000 151 1521 81.15 -00 81.17 -00 TRSFR FROM WATER & SEWER FN ` TRSFR FROM CRA TRUST FUND 200,000 120,000 250,000 150,000 250,000 120,000 250,000 120,000 153 81.18 -00 ITRSFR FROM ESCROW ACCTS 0 0 0 0 154 82.30 -00 CONTRIBTN -SHOPS AT SUNSET 0 _ 0 0 _ 0_ 155 -- - NEW REVENUE SOURCES - -- 0 0 - 0 0 156 - - -- - 157 158 TOTAL SALES & REIMB. 3 $658,213 1 $741,000'' _ $496,000 $496,000 - - 159 160 161 - - - - -- - - -- -1- TOTAL GEN.fD REVENUES - - - -� $_11,889,361 -- - - -- - $12,439,352 - - - - - -- $12,433,659 - - -- $13,382,865 162 163 CASH CARRYOVER 1,488,762 1,260,381 800,000 800,000 164 _ess CONTINGENCY CASH RESERV ` (1,225,162) (1,225,16222 _ (800,000) - (800,000) 165 166 OTAL AVAILABLE FUNDS $12,152,961 - $12,474,571 $12,433,65_9 $13,382,865 167 '= - --- 168 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.373 MILLS -1 MILL INCREASE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C D I J 1 _ _ CITY 2 JAID_ VALOR_ EM TAXES r ACTUAL - ADOPTED DEPARTMENT'S MANAGER'S' 3 _ EXPENDITURES 1 BUDGET REQUESTS RECOMMENDATIONS 4 _ _ 2001 -2002 2002 -200 2003 -2004 2003 -2004 5 - -- - - - - - -- - - 6 _ - MILEAGE RATE - -- 6.373 6,373 6373 -- - 7.373 8 s VALUE OF ONE MILL B( ASED 814,906 833,501 912,000 9101144 10 REAL & PERSONAL PROPERTIES 12 LESS VALUE OF ONE MILL FO _(60,835 550,132 _ 555,132` (63,932) - -- -- - - 13 _ CRA INCREASE /DECREASE IN TAXABLE ASSESSMENT _ 14 _ 1 15 VALUE OF ONE MILL (AFTER DEDUCTING - - 16 - }50% OF CRA INCREASED ASSE : 754,065 7831369 � 856,868 846,212 -- 18 _ 95% O_F 1 MILL (TO ALLOW FO 716,362 744_,201 1 814,025 1 803_ ,901 19 rDELETIONS & DELINQUENCIES)` i 20 21 _ AD VALOREM TAXES_ (BASED 4,565,37_3 4,742,790 5,187,779 5,927,165 22 T95% OF 1 MILL) 23 LESS SENIOR CITIZENS DISCO 01 01 0 0 24 _ 25 _ NET PROPERTY TAX COLLECT 4,565,373 4,742,790 - 5,187,779 f 5,927,165 26 - - - - 27 _ 1 CITY 28 L ACTUAL ADOPTED DEPARTMENT'S MANAGER'S 29 _ ACCT AC_ COUNT CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURES BUDGET r REQUESTS RECOMMENDATIONS 30 NO 2001-2002 2002-2003____ r 2003 2004 2003 2004 31 - - -- - :.. - 32 1100 LEGISLATURE -CITY COMMISSII $108,100 $114,054 $131,091 _ $36,923 33 - 1200_ CITY CLERK _ 141,920 120,505 148,119 _ 125,046 34 _1310 CITY MANAGER 1 _ 214,202 280,874 " 296,521 t 259,922 35 1315 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAI 131,336 141,000 49,5 ' 00 49,500 36 1320 TICE SERVICES 173,999 183,495 - 226,529 216,350 37 1330 HUMAN RESOURCES 125,344 � 193,216 143,898 _ _ 166,975 36 1340 MANAGEMENT INFORMATION j 142,245I 155,352 304,498 _ 223,867 39 1410 1 FINANCE DEPARTMENT' 340,604 _ 364,288 392,385 ] 389,302 a0 1420 ANON- DEPARTMENTINSURANCI 489,6321 505,500 736,6_91 731,191 41 1500 CITY ATTORNEY 229,491 226,625 382,250 L 382,250 42 1610 BUILDING DIVISION 278,532 305,001 342,1581 329,037 43 1620 !PLANNING DIVISION 384,157 358,400 409,422 437,361 44 1640 !CODE ENFORCEMENT 197,873 210,024 222,348 222,350 45 _ .IPUBLIC WORKS 2,601,656 { 2,615,124 3,755,228 ; 3,008,940 46 7710 BLDG. MAINT 357,115 437,672 623,734 351,527 47 1720 -SOLID WASTE 1,143,718 1,064,972 1,266,551 i 1,244,083 - - -- - - - 46 1730 1 - STREET MAINT (I 138,613 156,849 695,331 464,822 49 1750 LAND_SCAPE_MAINT I' 0 0 0 0 50 1760 f - EQUIPMENT MAINT 514,209 1 552,945 689,016 _ 566,357 51 1770_ -OFFC_ OF DIRECTOR 179,545 192,281 201,971 � 196,050 52 1790 EN_GRNG,CONSTRCTN &STOR 268,456 210,404 279,126 1 186001 53 _ 1910' ,POLICE -LAW ENFORCEMENT �__ 4,733,581 I 4,762,919 1 5,951,162 4,521,460 54 2000 RECREATION 1,267,559 + 1,330,919 1,265,386 1,217,625 ___ _ - 55 2100 1NON DEPARTMENTAL EXPEN LL� 684,492 607,276 1,027,040 55 1,064,767 57 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $.12,244,723 I $12,474,571 $15,784,226 $13,3821865 se _ - - __ __ _� __ - = =i =_ -____] -- - -= - -- - -- ss TOTAL PERSONNEL 168.00 1 163 50� 169.00 _ 149.00 - - -- - - 6o THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 1 i PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.373 MILLS -1' MILL INCREASE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C D 61 62. 63 FUND DEPARTMENT DIVISION GENERAL _ LEGISLATIVE _ CITY COMMISSION 01 ! _ 11 "00 64 FUNCTION LEGISLATIVE _ - - -- - - 65 - -- - - -- - -- CITY -- ss _ ACTUAL ADOPTED DEPARTMENT'S MANAGER'S 67 _ACCT ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURES BUDGET REQUESTS RECOMMENDATIONS se NO _ 1 2001 2002 2002 2003 2003 -2004 _ 2003-2004 69 - - 70 SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS' SALARIES & WAGES EXECUT SALARIES & WAGES - REGULA 15,0001 28,089 $15,000 30,034 $15,000 _ 31083 - $15,000 p 71 72 - 1110 1210 73 74 75 76 _ _2110 TOTAL SALARIES_ & WAGES �_ F._I C A. _________$43,089 3,291 - $45,034 3,445 $46,083 -- 3,525 - $15,000 77 2210 2310!GROUP PENSION PLAN -EX C_OMMISSI HEALTH INSURANCE ` _0 0 0 _1,148 + p 78 7s - 3,697 4,480 - 4 483 0 -- - -- eo _ TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE - $50,077 $52,959 $54,091 $16,148 Bt 82 SERVICES & SUPPLIES -- - 83 84 3210 4010 AUDITOR'S FEE MAYOR'S EXPENSE 35,00_01 1,833 $39,000 2,000 ! $55,000 $p - - 2,000 2,000 85 1__________4020 1 4030 4040 COMMISSIONER'S EXPENSE-0 COMMISSIONER'S EXPENSE -F COMMISSIONER'S EXPENSE I_ -_ 1,467 1,360 1,130 1,500 1,500 11500 1,500 1,500 86 87 _ -T 1,500 1,500 - 1,500- 88 4050 4060 COMMISSIONER'S EXPENSE -T' MAYOR'S AUTO ALLOWANCE 1,467 _ 500 1_,500 500 _ 1,500 500 1,500 ----- - Soo 89 90 4120 4830 COMMUNICATIONS TELE_ PHO & FLOWERS _ 4,461 5,500 _ _ _ 5,500 __ _ 51500 91 KEYS _ 3,136 2,095 2,000 1 500 92 4840 5210 TV BROADCSTNG COMMISSN SUPPLIES - _ ` -- ! 0 _ _ 0 p -1-.10-6-0- p s3 - - - _ 2,212 2,000 2,000 sa 5410 MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTL - 5,457 4,000 4,000 -- - - 3,275 95 96 - _ TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES - -- - $58,023 $61,095 - - - $77,000 $20,775 97 28 _ - TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE $108,100 $114,064 $131,091 $36,923 99 CAPITAL OUTLAY _ EQUIPMENT OFFICE 100 101 6420 $0� 0 - $0 0 $0 p $p _ p 102 _ 6430 EQUIPMENT OPERATING -. 103 - $0 $0 - - 1o4 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY $0� 10s _ _ TOTAL EXPENDITURES �- - $108,100 $114,054 $131,091 $36,923 106 107 108 BUDGETED POSITIONS _ _= _ °^ - -- 110 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER - - CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B„ C I D 1 J 112 113 CITY COMMISSION BUDGET COMMENTS F/Y 2003 -2004 114 ACCT NO. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PROPOSED i i6l ,17 118 1100 - 511 -1110 1100- 511 -1_210 SALARIES - EXECUTIVES SALARIES & WAGES - REGULA $15,000 '0 MAYOR &CITY COMMISSION 119 12011100-511-2110 121 - - F.I.C.A. - -- — - PENSION PLAN - -- - 1,14 0 - - - - - -- -- - -- -- - -- 122 1100 - 511 -2210 123 12411100-611-23110 O P HEALTH INSURANCE+ 125 MAYOR'S EXPENSE 126 127 1100- 511 -4010 12a 1100- 511-4020 - COMMISSIONER ONE - - - 1,500 - - - - 129 -- COMMISSIONER FOUR 1,500 - I - - 130 1100- 511 -4030 132 1100- 511 -4040 COMMISSIONER THREE -- - 1,500 - -- - - - -- 133 134 136 1100- 511 -4050 - — 1100-511-4060 iCOMMISSIONER TWO — - -- MAYOR'S.AUTO ALLOWANCE 1,6001 - - 137 13811100-511-4120 COMMUNICATIONS- TELEPHO - 5,500 - -- -- - 139 14011100-511 141 - =- 4830 1100- 511 - 4_8400 - - - - -- KEYS & FLOWERS — TV BROADCSTNG- COMMISSN - -- - -- _1150.0 0 - - - - - - - -1 - -- - 1 142 143 144 1100-511-5210 — _ - - SUPPLIES — - - - -� 2,000 -- _ - - -- ,4s 146 147 1100-511-5410 5 0 — — - -- -- MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI �- - -- -- 3,275 1 iI i - -- - -- - -- - 146 149 — -- TOTAL -- -- — r — $36,923 - -- — - — - - -- - 15o THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER - - - -___ CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B: C D I J 151 152 153 FUND DEPARTMENT DIVISION ° GENERAL 01 I CITY CLERK 12 CITY CLERK 00 154 FUNCTION _ EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT 5121 - 155 - CITY 156 157 ACCT _ ACTUAL ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION f EXPENDITURES ADOPTED BUDGET DEPARTMENT'S REQUESTS _ MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATIONS 158 159 NO - 2001 -2002 - 2002 -2003 2003 -2004 2003 -2004 160 SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS - 161 _ 1210 SALARIES & WAGES - RE_GULA �- $91,687 _ - - _ $94,562 - -- - 162 163 --.-.--.-.TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES $89,853 ---- 7 $94,562 $93,187 164 _ _ - _ 165 2110 _ F. I. C. A. $7,091 $7,014 $7,234_ $7,129 166 167 2220 2310 DEFERRED COMP. CONTRIBU 3,000 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 7,153 4,000 8,404 4,000 8,373 _ 4,000 9,780' - - - 168 169 1 - - - - - !TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE $107,097 - -- - - $111,105 - --^-- -- r $114,1',69 - - - - -- - - -- $114,096 170 +I 171 _ 4060 SERVICES & SUPPLIES - EMPLOYEE AUTO ALLOWANC 1 $500 - - $500 $500 -- - - - $500 172 173 _ 4070 4080 4910 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE 0 - _ EDUCATION 135 LEGAL AD 19,798 300 400 0-1 1 0 400 23,000 0 400 174 175 - =- - _ 0 _- 176 4920 ELECTIONS - 9,990 1,000 ': -- 4,000 4,000 177 178 4950 5210 CODIFICATIONS 2,478 SUPPLIES - 854 4,000 800 5,000 800 5,000 800 179 5410 MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTS 165 400 250 - - - - - -- - _ -- - - 250 - - _ _TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES _ $33,920 $7,400 50 - - $33,9 $10,950 180 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE -_ $141,017 $118,505 _$148,119 - $125,046 CAPITAL OUTLAY 6420 EQUIPMENT OFFICE 0 0 RECORDS RETENTION _ _ 903 2,000 - TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY _ $903 $2,000 $0 $p 190 - -- -- 191 - TOTAL EXPENDITURES _ _ - $141,920 - $120,505 $148,119 $125,046 192 __ __ 193 BUDGETED POSITIONS 2 - 2 - 2 2 194 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER I - CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A` ' B' g p I J 195 196 CITY CLERK 1 BUDGET COMMENTS _ 197 FN 2003 -2004 I 198 ACCT. ACCOUNT PROPOSED - -_ 199 200 NO. DESCRIPTION $93,187 - - 202 203 204 1200- 512 -1210 1200- 512 -2110 SALARIES & WAGES - EXECUT� F.I.C.A. 205 20611200-512-2220 207 - DEFERRED COMP CONTRIBUT -- — 4,000 — - -- 1 - —}- - -; -- - 206 1200- 512 -2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 9,780E ___ l -- 209 z10 1200- 512 -4060 AUTO ALLOWANCE 500 - 211 1200 - 512 -4070 TRAVEL &CONFERENCE _ 0 212 213 1200- 5124080 EDUCATION _ 400 - - -- — - -- 213 215 216 217 1200- 512 -4910 1200- 512 - LEGAL AD ELECTIONS _ 0 _- 218 219 _4920 22o 221 1200- 512- 4950 ilCODIFICATIONS _ (SUPPLIES _5,000 -- L — - - 222 223 12_00 -512 -5210 -- 800 - 224 225 1200 - 512 -5410 - MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI - — 250 — 1 226 227 228 1200- 512- 6510 _ RECORDS RETENTION TOTAL p $125,046 j 229 zs - - -_ 23o THIS PAGE IS PRINTED - - ON RECYCLED PAPER — - CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C D I J 231 FUND J-GENERAL 232 DEPARTMENT ,CITY _ MANAGER 13 233 DIVISION _ CITY MANAGER _ 10 234 FUNCTION EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT 513 235 _ CITY -- 236 _ r ACTUAL -- ADOPTED DEPARTMENT'S MANAGER'S 237 _ _ ACCT ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURES BUDGET REQUESTS RECOMMENDATIONS 238 NO _ 2001-2002 2_002 -2003 2003-2004------------.--2003-20-O4 239 240 241 242 _ ;1�LARIES SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS & WAGES - REGULA $175,080 $227,533_1 $237,409 $203,501 243 _ i TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES $175,080 $227,533 - $237,409 - $203,501 244 245 2110 F. I. C. A. $11,647 $17,406 $18,162 $15,568 246 - 2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 15,057 22,735 22,500 _ 28,153 247 248 _ TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE $201,784 $267,674 $278,071 $247,222 SERVICES SUPPLIES 3450J. _& SERVICES - $0 $0 _ 125,,6 4060 AUTO ALLOWANCE I 7,20_0 1- 7,200 7,200 7,200 4066 CITY MANAGER EXPENSE 813 500 1,000 1,000 4070 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE _ 0 a 0 l 1,500 750 40800 4630 EMPLOYEE EDUCATION' - REPAIR & MAINT- OPERATING 199 510 500 1,000 _ 2,000 1,2.00 _ 1,000 0 257 485_0 N_ON LEGAL ADVERTISING 0 0 _ 0 - 0 258 52_10 SUPPLIES _ 2,841 3,000 _ 3,000 _ 2,000 259 - 5410 �__ MEMBERSHIPS &_SUB_SCRIPITI 28_4 1,000 1,000 750_ 260 261 _-----------,,TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES ^-_^a^ -^--' _ $11,847 $13,200 $16,900 � _ _ $12,700 - 262 263 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE - - -- - - $213,631 i $280,874 a $294,971 1 $259,922 264 CAPITAL_OUTLAY 265 266 � 6420 6430 EQUIPMENT OFFICE - EQUIPMENT- OPERATING - -- - 137 -- -- - $0 � - -- _ -- -- -- $850 - - - - - -- $0 267 434 - -0� - - ' 700 _ 0 268 r - 269 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY $571 $0 $1,550 $0 270 - - - - - -_:__ _ - 271 _ _ TOTAL EXPENDITURES $214,202 $280,874 $296,521 $259,922 272 BUDGETED POSITIONS__ 3 3 - 3 + - _ 3 274 J 275 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER - CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C D I J 276 _CITY MANAGER, 277 _ _ BUDGET COMMENTS - 276 _ FIY 2003 -2004 - - 279 -- - - - -- - -- - - 2eo 281 ACCT. N0. ;- ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PROPOSED 282 -- -- - - - -- - 283 1310 -513 -1210 SALARIES - REGULAR $203,501 CITY MGR, ASST TO CITY MGR, ADMIN ASST 284 28511310-613-2110 F.I.C.A. 15,568 _ 287 1310- 513- 2310'GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 28153 - -- - -- - 288 0 289 1310 -513 -3450 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - -- -- 290 - - - - -- - -- - - -- -- 291 1310- 513- 4060IAUTO ALLOWANCE 7,200 AUTO ALLOWANCE FOR CITY MGR 292 293 1310 - 513 -40651 CITY MANAGER EXPENSE - 1,000 294 29511310 296 - 613-4070 - TRAVEL & CONFERENCE - -- 750 -- i - - - - 297 1310- 513 - 4080 rEMPLOYEE EDUCATION 1,000 T 298 -4630 - - -- - -- - - - - _ 299 300 301 302 1310- 513 1310-613-6210 MAINTENANCE & REP. -COMM. SUPPLIES -,- - 2,000 �CARTRIDGE_S - _ FOR OTHER OFFICE SUPPLIES_ PRINTERS AND FAX - MACHINE -5410 _ MEMBERSHIPS & — 303 304 1310- 513 SUBSCRIPTI' — 750! - 305 306 307 - - — - TOTAL - - -- $259,922 - - - - — - - 309 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A g,` C p 309 FUND GENERAL _p 310 DEPARTMENT CITY MANAGER 13 — - -- - - 311 DIVISION INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAI 15 31z FUNCTION EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT 513 -- - - -- 313 ADOPTED BUDGET - ACTUAL EXPENDITURES - - TOTAL PROJECTIONS +- - -- DEPARTMENT'S REQUESTS" 314 315 ACCT ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION _ 316 317 NO ' - - SERVICES & SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT ADJUSTMENT 2001 -200_2 2001- 200_2 - - -- _ — 2002 -2003 J - - - - - - -- - 2003-200 4 - -- - - - - 316 319 - 320 34501 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES $113,954 110 523 $135,000 $42,000 321 - 4070 TRAVEL &CONFERENCE - -- _ 20 20,813 t- — 15,000 7,500 322 TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES - - - -- _ $49,500 323 $133,954 _ $131,336 $150,000 324 - -- - - -- _ -- --- -- - -- 325 326 -- - - - -- - -- - t 327 - -- - - - - -- - - 328 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER - - -- - - - - CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C D d 329 _ INTERGOVERNMENTAL BUDGET COMMENTS AFFAIRS - -- 330 - - - - -- - - -,F/Y 331 - — 2003-2004 T -- - -- - - 332 - - - - — - - - -- - - 333 ACCT. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PROPOSED -- - -- - 334 NO -- _ - -- -- 335 - - _ — .. -- 336 1315- 513 -3450 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - #REF! 337 338 1315- 513 -4070 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE - #REF! - 339 - -- 340 — — — — - — - - - -- 341 TOTAL - - ' #REFS 342 -- — - -- - 343 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER -- -- -- - - -- CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C p 344 FUND GENERAL 01 Sae DEPARTMENT FINANCE- 13 - -- 34s DIVISION OFFICE SERVICES _ 20 347 FUNCTION FINANCIAL AND'ADMINISTRAT 513 - - - -- -- -- - - -- CITY 349 350 ACTUAL ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURES - 2001 -2002- I ADOPTED BUDGET 2002 -2003_ DEPARTMENT'S REQUESTS -2003 -2004 MANAGER S RECOMMENDATIONS 2003 -2004 -- -- _ ACCT NO _ �_ 351 352 353 353 1210 LARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS _ _ SALARIES & WAGES - REGULA 88,428 _ _ $89,584 - $98,359 - -- - -- - -- $93,882 355 - - -- 356 TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES - - - - -- $88,428 $89,584 $98,359 $93,882 357 - - 358 _ 2110 - 2310 - - GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 6,496 - -- - _ 7,129 6,853 - _ 8,733 7,524 - 8,366 7,182 9,806 354 360 361 362 363 _- TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE SERVICES & SUPPLIES _$102,053 $105,170 - $114,249 - -- - - -- - $110,870 365 3450 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES _ _ $0 _ $0 _ _ _ _$0 $0 366 367 _ 4070 4080, TRAVEL & CONFERENCE rt_ EMPLOYEE EDUCATION 0 ± _ _ 180 _ 0 100 200 _ _ 100 200 368 369 4110 - 4420 __46151MAINT POSTAGE !LEASE: PURCH - POSTAGE MAC & REP. OFFICE EQUIP 16,764 31858 + _ _ 2,055 1 8,000 18,000_1 4,080 _2,400} _ _ 26000 F - 4,060 _ 3,000 _ _ 25 000 4,060 2,800 370 371 4620'MAINT &REP OPERATING_ EQU 1,112 1,270 _ _ _ j 1,270 372 4630 M_AINT & REP COMM EQPT _ ___ 590 600 -1,270 600 _ 0 373 374 4710 4720 PRINTING /BIND /P ING HOTO CO CONTRACTUAL 22,453 _ f 29,700 { _ 35,400 30,500 375 +PRINTING SUPPLIES - _ UNIFORMS __ 51470 -- 19,644 1,500 20,000 3,500 _ _ 25,000 8 900 22,000 _ _5210 5220 376 377 5410 - MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI p - 370 - _ 350 350 - - -- - 0 - - + - - 225 - 300 300 378 37s _ - TOTAL SERVICES &SUPPLIES $71,946 -- - $78,325 - - ----$99,7801 - - -- $95,480 380 381 - TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE $173,999 $183,495 $214,029 - - $206,350 382 - - - -- - 383 384 - 6420jOFFICE CAPITAL OUTLAY EQUIPMENT _ - _ ___ _01 -- _ _ $0 _ ___ - - - -- - $p 385 _ 6430 OPERATING EQUIPMENT 0 _ - 0 10,000 - - - _ 10,000 386 387 CAPITAL OUTLAY_ $0 $0 $12,500 388 __TOTAL _ - - - - - - - $70,000 - - - 389 EXPENDITURES $173,999 ------[TOTAL - $183,495 $226,529 $218,350 390 BUDGETED POSITIONS -- - 2 - - 2 - - 391 392 - - - -�-- -- - -- -- - - -- 393 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER - i CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A,; B C D' I J 394 OFFICE SERVICES] 395 396 397 398 ACCT. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION BUDGET COMMENTS F/Y 2003 -2004 T 399 — NO. - - -- -� -- — — - - 400 - -- - - -- - 4o1 402 - 1320- 513 -1210 SALARIES -REGULAR $93,882 PURCHASING MGR AND CENTRAL SEIRVICES - - SPECIALIST -- 403 aoa 405 1320- 513 -2110 1320-513-2310 F.1 C.A. -_ GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 7,182 9,806 407 408 4o9 1320 - 513 -4070 — - 1320- 513 -4080 1 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EMPLOYEE EDUCATION_ -1 200 _ - -- -- -- - - �-- - - a - - - - - - - 411 412 1320 - 513.4110 J POSTAGE 25,0.00 REGULAR & BULK MAILS. ALARMS NOTICES CODE ENFCMNT NOTICES AND OTHERS' 413 415 13207513 -4420 LEASE PURCHASE POSTAGE { 4,060 LEASE FROM PITNEY BOWES-____ 11s 416 417 1320- 513 -4615 1320- 513- 46201MAINT.- AINT.- OFFICE EQUIP _- _ OPERATING EQUIP_ 2,800 _ - -- 1,270 MAINTENANCE FOR OFFICE EQPTS .- - - 1. 'MAINTENANCE FOR CHECKWRITERS AND SIGNER 418 419 .._ _ 1 -- - 420 421 422 1320- 5134630 `- - - _- 1320 - 513 -4710 MAINTENANCE & REP. -COMM. — - - PRINTIBINDICOPYING ' t ^0 -- 30,500 - - -- - - - LEASE FOR PHOTOCOPYING MACHINES 423 `_ —- - — AND RISO'PRINTER - - -- aza 42511320-5134720 426 427 _ 1320- 513 -5210 — !PRINTING CONTRACTUAL V - SUPPLIES - - - -8,900 - 22,000 STATIONARY PRINTING SHELLS, LAND DEV CODE BOOK FINANCIAL_ REPORT AND AUDITORS COVERS, ETC. 428 429 1320-613-5220 UNIFORMS _ 350 - FOR IN -HOUSE PRINTING JOBS -- - - - - 430 431 - 1320- 513 -5410 lMEMB`IE-R-S - -- -- - HIPS & SUBSCRIPTI - - - 300 - - _. -- NATIONAL GOVERNMENT PURCHASING MGR ASSOC. 432 433 _ 1320 513-6430 OPERATING EQUIPMENT 10,000 !SOFTWARE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH G_ASB 34 434 435 - - AS REQUIRED BY GOVT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD - 436 437 ! TOTAL —_ -- $216,350 '- -- - 438 THIS PAGE IS >PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET 439 44o 4a1 A: FUND IGENERAL DEPARTMENT I DIVISION B C _ 01� CITY MANAGER 131 HUMAN RESOURCES _ _ 30 - " - - J 72 FUNCTION_ FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRAT 5131 - - - - - - - -- - - - 443 444 ACCT ACTUAL ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURES fi ADOPTED_ BUDGET DEPARTMENT'S REQUESTS CITY _ MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATIONS 445 NO ` 2001 - 2002 2002 -2003 2003 -2004 2003 2004 a46 447 - - - SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS 4481 449 ,_ 1210 SALARIES & WAGES-- REGULA _ 87,290 $131,432 $108,359 $108,359 450 451 452 J -TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES _ - $87,290 _ $131,432 $108,359 - $108,359 453 a5a 455 2110 2310 2610 - F. I C A. - 6,534 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 7,120 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PRO - - _ 0 -�_ -a - 1_0,055 - 1!1,910 3,500 _ 8,289 8,800 3,500 J 8,289 9,877 3,500 -- __. 456 457 456 _ - TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE $100,944 $156,897 1 - _ $128,948 $130,025 4591 460 - -' SERVICES & SUPPLIES - - - - - - - -- �- - -- - -- - 461 _____3160 1 PRE- EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL _^ 2,489 $3,000 __ $3,000 $_3,000 462 3450 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,248 0 500 0 463 4070 _4080 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE _ 0 TRAINING - 4,2731 900 7,569 500 1 6,000 _ 500 3,500 464 ass _ 4110 _CITYWIDE - _ POSTAGE _ _ 508 _ 0 300 300 4630 MAINTENANCE & REP -COMM E 590 - -_- - -- ` 350 - - 0 _ v 0 M468 4850 ' - ADVERTISING- NON LEGAL 3,651 - - 3,500 3,500 - - 3,500 46.9 _ -521 53101 SUPPLIES _ 1,657 MISCELLANEOUS SEVERANC 0 1 1,000 29,000 800 Ii 0 _ 800 2.5,000 470 - 5410 _ MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI 196 � -- -- - -- - - _ 0 _ ( - 35 _ - - _ 350 471 a72 _ -- 1 rTOTAL SERVICES &SUPPLIES $23,612 $36319 � , $1_4,950 _ $36,950_ 473 - - - 474 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE ___V24,566 $193,216 r $143,898 $166,975 475 476 477 - - -- 6420 -- -6430 - - - - - -- - - - - -- -- CAPITAL OUTLAY OFFICE EQUIPMENT 788 - - -^ _.: - - -- $0 +- - -- - -- - $0 - -- - _ _ $0 478 OPERATING EQUIPMENT 0 - 0� -- -- 0 -- -- 0 47s 480 _ TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY - $7881 - - J $0 _ - $0 - $0 481 as2 - TOTAL EXPENDITURES - _1 J _ $125,344 j $193,216 $143,898 ( $166,975 483 484 485 _ , - }I BUDGETED POSITIONS_ 31 - - _ _ _ 3 2 -- - - 2 486 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER - CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B'_ C p 487 HUMAN RESOURCES BUDGET COMMENTS FIY 2003 -2004 - _- - - (- - - - - - -- -- -- -- 488 4as 490 491 492 ACCT. NO.' ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION _ PROPOSED 493 494 1330- 513 -1210 SALARIES -REGULAR - $108,359 - - - H.R. MANAGER & H.R. ASST. - - - -- 495 - — _ _ - —- -- -- - �— 496 497 ass 1330- 513 -2110 - 1330- 513 -2310 F.I.C.A. GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE- 8,289 - -� 9,877 - - - - - - -- - - -- - - -- - 500 1330-613-2610 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PRO - 3,500 - 502 1330 -513- 3160 PRE- EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL -- -- - 3,000 - - - 503 - 504 505 1330- 513 -4070 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE 500 -- -- - sos 1330-513-4080 CITYWIDE TRAINING -- - - 3,500 - - - - - - - -- -- - - - 507 - 5os 1330 - 5134110 - - -- POSTAGE - - - - - 509 - ADVERTISING -- - -- - 510 1330-513-4850 -NON LEGAL 3,500 - - - 512 SUPPLIES 800 - - - - - - - -- 1330-513-6210 -- 513 514 1330 - 513 -5310 MISCELLANEOUS- SEVERANC - - 515 516 MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI ; -- - 35_01 - -- - - 1330-513-5410 517 518 -- I - - -- - -� - - - - - -- - - - -- - 519 - - -- - -- =- 520 TOTAL 521 522 — -_ THIS PAGE IS PTED - RIN ON RECY- CLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B_ C D J 523 FUND_ _ GENERAL 01 524 DEPARTMENT FINANCE _ 13F - 525 DIVISION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION 40� - - - _ - 526 FUNCTION FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRAT _ - 527 sza s29 - ACCT - - - -- - ACTUAL_ EXPENDITURES - - - - - -- ADOPTED BUDGET - - - -= DEPARTMENT'S REQUESTS - -- CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATIONS ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION 530 NO 2001-2002 _� 2002 -2003 2003 -2004 2003 2004 - _ - -- - _ - 531 60,233 _ $60,323 - - - - -- -- 532 533 1210 SALARIES_ & FRINGE BENEFITS SALARIES & WAGES - REGULA 534 $62,435 $62,435 535 _TOTAL _ SALARIES & WAGES - $60,233 - $60,323 $62,435 r _ $62,435 - - 53 6 537 2110 F. I C A. -- -- - 536 2310 GROUP HEALTH 4,602 4,776 4,776 - fNSURANCE_ -- - - - -4,539 4,664 4,975 53 9 r - - - sao - -- TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE _ $68,709 - $6%4771 _ $71,875 $72,186 541 542 _ - SERVICES & SUPPLIES ' - - - -- - _ - _ -- - -- - -- - - - 543 - - 544 3450 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - __________._$20,000 $7,500 545 4070 4_080 4110 TRAVEL &_CONFERENCE TRAINING - POSTAGE _ _0 r _ 0 71 - 500 750 -_ _ 2,000 5000 -- �._ _ - - _-500 - 1,000 sas 547 _ _ _ 0 500 p 548 549 4446LEASE 4450 PURCHASE -AS 400 LEASE PURCHASE INTERNET_ - 8,239 1 11,680 �- 8,988 _ 12 000 �__ _ 0 550 _ 4630 MAINTENANCE & REP COMM E _ 846 _ 12,000 0 _ _ 38,000 600 -- - 10,082 551 552 _4_632 4633 INTERNET SERVICE - MAINTENANCE-COMPUTER NT_ T _ 34,426 37,940 - 43,523 p _ _ 43,523 553 4634 5210 - - MAIN_T_ENANCE- INTERNET SFT SUPPLIES - - _ - - _ _6,350 0 -- - 884_ 18,500 _ 0 - 2,197 _ _ 19,000 30,000 - - 5,000 25,240 2Q000 -- - ---- 554 555 - - - -- 556 557 TOTAL SERVICES &SUPPLIES - - _ _ $62,496 _ $80,875 - - $175_23 _ $247,498 _ $110,345 ( -- $182,531 sse TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE -- - - - $131,2051 $150,352 559 - - 560 _ CAPITAL OUTLAY 1- + - Ss1 562 6430 - -- OPERATING EQUIPMENT - - - -- - $11,040 _ $5,000 - $57,000 - � - - - - $41,336 563 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY - - $11,040 - __$5,0001 - $57,000 $304,498 L - $41,336 $223,867 565 _� OT L E TA XPENDITURES - - -� - _ $142,245 .� $155_352 sss 567 568 (BUDGETED POSITIONS 569 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER -- `- -- CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET is PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.373 MILLS -1 MILL INCREASE �. r A B': C D 570 MANAG_EMENT'INFORMATION S_YSTEM_S 571 572 BUDGET COMMENTS F/Y 2003 - 2004 -� - 573 574 575 ACCT. NO. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PROPOSED - - - -- � -- �- - 576 577 1340- 513 SALARIES REGULAR - - - - - - -- - -- -- - - 578 -1210 - $62,435 MIS _MANAGER - - - - -- - -- - 579 1340 -513 -2110 -2310 F.I.C.A. 'GROUP 4,776 - - - - - - - - 581 1340- 513 HEALTH INSURANCE 4,975 - -- 582 s83 584 1340- 513 -3450 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - 7,50.0 - - MAINTENANCE OF CITY �WEBSITE - -- -- - - - - - -- 585 586 1340- 513 -4070 1340- 513 -4080 - 1340 513 -411 _ TRAVEL & CONFERENCE TRAINING_ - - _ 1,000 - - -- - - - -- - -- - - - - -- - -- - -- -- i - -- - - -- 5e7 588 589 - POSTAGE ESE PURCHASE -AS 400 — -- LEASE PURCHASE INTERNET - - p 0 � 10,08.2 I I - PLEASE AGREEMENT FOR - - -- ss1 592 593 1340 - 513 -4445 1340- 513 -4450 - - 594 �CISCO ROUTER - - - 595 sss 1340- 513 -4632 FINTERNET SERVICE 43,523 INTERNET SERVICES TO:' CITY HALL -- 597 598 599 -, 1340- ...... — _ _ _ _ -( _ AFTER SCHOOL HOUSE PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING- MULTI PURPOSE BUILDING - 600 513 -4633 COMPUTER NETW 25,240 LMTCE AGREEMENT FOR (HTE MAIN APPLICATIONS) 601 �MAINTNCE- _ _ - MICROSOFT_ AND CSG -- 602 so3 1340 - 513- 4634�MAINTNGE- INTERNET SERVIC _ _. 20,000 LICENSES FOR THE SERVER - _ 604 sos 606 _ _ _ SUPPLIES _ - _ __ 2,500 AND 20 USERS OPERATING SOFTWARE BACKUP TAPES AND OTHERS _ l - t - - _ 1340-513-5210 607 sob 609 1340- 513 -6430 OPERATING EQUIPMENT_ _ 41,336 REPLACEMENTS F-0-41-6 PCs--- BACKUP STORAGE AND A REPLACEMENT SERVER - - -- -- -- s10 - -- TOTAL _$223,867 -- - - - - 1 - - -- -_ 611 -- - - -__= -- is PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.373 MILLS -1 MILL INCREASE �. r CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A I B C D I J 612 613 614 615 FUND DEPARTMENT DIVISION i FUNCTION (GENERAL FINANCE FINANCIAL CIAL & ADMINISTRATIO FINANCIAL & ADMINISTRATIO _ _ 01 14 10 _ - - - - -- - 616 -- _ 513 _ -- - - s1 � 61e 61s ACCT NO - ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION - _ ACTUAL EXPENDITURES 2001 -2002 ADOPTED BUDGET 2002 -2003 DEPARTMENT'S REQUESTS` 2003-2004 _ _CITY MANAGER'S RE_ COMMENDATIONS 2003 -2004 621 _ SALARIES &FRINGE BENEFITS.` s2z 623 1210 1410 SA_L_ARIES & WAGES - REGULA�� OVERTIME - -- $288,272 53 $303,684 750 $322,612 - - S00 _ $320,936 500 624 - -'- -- - 625 626 - TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES 288,325 - 304,434 - 323,112 321 436 --- -' - 627 2110 F 1. C. A. - _ 21,145 23,289 24,718 24,590 628 629 2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE _ 21,566 _ 25,840 25,330 29,051 - - - - ' s3o TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE _ _____$331,036 $353,563 - - 160 - - -- $373, _ $375,077 sal SERVICES & SUPPLIES ( __ - - - -- - - 633 _ 3450 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES $0 $0 -- - $0 634 4070 T AVEL & CONFERENCE 1 914 _ _1 550 2 5 00� 1,550 s35 4080 EMPLOYEE EDUCATION 718 2,200 _ _ 3,700 2,200 636 637 _ _ 4620 4630 MAINTENANCE- OPERATING E MAINTENANCE & REP -COMM E - 912 590 _ 1,000 500_ _ 2,000 _ 1,000 SUPPLIES S00 638 _5210 - - 4,097 4,000 ' 51000 639 6a1 _- 5410 MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPT( TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES 1,201 _ 1,475 [ 1,475 L 1 475 - -- - _ $9,432 - $10,725 - _ $15,225 $10,725' 642 643 _ TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE I - - - �_ $340,468 $364,288 $388,385 $385,802' 644 � 645 646 64201 �CAPITAL OUTLAY _ EQUIPMENT OFFICE _ 80 � -` - - - - 647 - 6430 EQUIPMENT OPERATING _ 56� _ - 0 4,000 3,500 648 1 bas _ 'TOTAL -� CAPITAL OUTLAY -- - - - $136 -' - - - $3,500 650 T f - - 651 652 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1 $340,604 $364, 288 I $392,385 - _ $389,302 653 s5a - - THIS PAGE IS BUDGETED POSITIONS Z _ NTED ON RECYCLED PAPER -- - - 6 -- _- - -- g - - g - - °- 6 -- - sss CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET 17 PROPOSED' BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.373 MILLS -1 MILL INCREASE A B C D J 656 _ FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION ' 657 s5a - — BUDGET COMMENTS FIY 2003 -2004 660 ACCT. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION - 'PROPOSED — - - -- - - -- _ -- - - -- - - 662 663 664 1410 - 513 -1210 -- -- - SALARIES -REGULAR _ - - - - -- 320,936 - - - DIRECTOR & 5 STAFF - -- — MEMBERS _ — - 665 66s 667 1410- 513 -1410 —.� OVERTIME 500 r — 66811410-513-2110 669 F.I C A. _ _ 24,590 67o 1410- 513 -2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE - 671 - - - 672 673 1410- 513 -3450 1410-513-4070 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TRAVEL & CONFERENCE_ _+ 0 1,550 — - 1CPE SEMINARS FOR DIRECTOR'S' CPA LICENSE &OTHER 674 675 _ 1410 513 -4080 EDUCATION — 2,200 IBUSINESS TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENTS T 677 s78 1410- 513 -4620 MAINTENANCE - EQUIP. — 1,000 +1MAINTENACE FOR DEPT'S SOFTWARE 679 68011410-613-6210 sal 1410- 513 -5410 !SUPPLIES_ _ MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI 4,500 1,475 'ACCTS PAYABLE, PAYROLL CHECKS, OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE AND OTHER SUPPLIES 682 683 684 _ j _ GOVT FINANCE OFCR_S ASSOC, AICPA, FICPA IAPPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF FINANCIAL REPORTS _ — 685 bas 1410 - 513 -6430 OPERATING EQUIPMENT — 3,500 REPLACEMENT OR WIDE CARRIAGE PRINTER USED FOR PAYROLL ACCTS PAYABLE REPORTS sal 688 TOTAL _ - - $389,302 - sas — _ THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER — - -- — - 17 PROPOSED' BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.373 MILLS -1 MILL INCREASE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PRO, POSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C D 690 FUND_ GENERAL 01 691 _ DEPARTMENT �::. FINANCE 14 _ 692 DIVISION __ _ INSURANCE _ �- 20 — - ss3 FUNCTION�OTHER GENERAL GOVT. SERV 519______ — 694 695t- ss _ _ ACTUAL _<_ _ ADOPTED _ _ _ DEPARTMENT'S _ CITY MANAGER'S 696 ACCT_ ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURES BUDGET REQUESTS RECOMMENDATIONS 697 - NO —� _ 2001 -2002- 2002 -2003 - 2003 -2004— 2003-2004 sss -00 2410 2510 WORKERS' COMPENSATION — UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSA 248,500 6,428 $193,500 15,000 $423,795 95 _ 35,000 - $422,795 — - 35,000 7011 4510 PROP'TY & LIABILITY INSURA 229,000 287,500 268,246 263,746_ 702 703 4520 4540 PUBLIC_EMP. BLANKET BOND BOILER& MACHINERY 1` 1,126 2,276 __ 2,500 3,000 4 — 1,400 2,750 1,409- 2,750 704 4_591 POLICE OFFICERS A.D.D_ 1,607 2,000 705 cos — 4592 DEATH BENEFITS FOR PENSIO 695 2,000 — _3,500 2,0001 — - 2,000 17071 TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIESj __ __ $489,632 $505,500 - $736,691 $731,191 "708 _ - ______ =:!-7 cos _ THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED' PER _ I _ CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A., B C I D 710 _ NON- DEPARTMENT INSURANCE 711 BUDGET COMMENTS _ 712 713 714 715 716 ACCT. NO. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ! WORKERS' COMPENSATION F/Y 2003 -2004 PROPOSED $422,795 - - -- 'WORKERS COMP COVERAGE FOR ALL EMPLOYEES - 71711420-519-2410 718 1420- 519 -2510 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSA - - 35,000 IUNEMPLOYMEN T - BENEFITS - - - -- 719 720 7z1 1420- 519 -4510 LIABILITY INSURANCE 263,746 722 - -- - AUTO, PROPERTY AND LIABILITY COVERAGE - - - - -- - - 723 724 1420-519-4520 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES BL_ANKE _ 1,400 - � - BOND FOR THE CITY MGR & FINANCE DIRECTOR AGAINST EMBEZZLEMENT_ 725 1420 519 -4540 BOILER &MACHINERY _ A.D.D.- - 2,750 - 3,500 COVERAGE FOR UNITS - - - -- STATUTORILY REQ'D LIFE INSURANCE �& AC_CIDEN_ T_AL DEATH & DISMEMBERMENT FOR POLICE 727 728 1420-519-45911-POLICE 1420- 519 729 -4592 DEATH BENEFITS FOR PENSIO 730 731 - 732 733 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPERY - -- - CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A ': B c p J 734 735 FUND DEPARTMENT GENERAL _ CITY ATTORNEY 01 - 15 - - 736 DIVISION ` CITY ATTORNEY 00 - -- 737 FUNCTION LEGAL COUNSEL 514 738 CITY - -- - - 739 ACTUAL _ EXPENDITURES ADOPTED BUDGET 2002 -2003 _ DEPARTMENT'S REQUESTS ` _ 2003 -2004 MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATIONS 003-2004 Tao _ACCT ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION 741 NO _ 2001 -2002 -- 742 - - - -- - 743 _ SERVICES & SUPPLIES -- 744 745 _- 3120 3410 LEGAL SERVICES -RETAINER LEGAL SERVICES - NON'RETAI - 90,000 91,679 _ $97,000 _ 50,000 _ $97,000 80,000 _ $_97,000 80,000 746 3420 CONSULTING_ TELEC_OMMUNIC _ 228 _ _ 15,000 _ 20,000 747 _ 3435 CONSULTING -REAL PROP /FOR _ 28,198 _ 20,000_ _20,000 15,000 __ 15,000 748 3440 CONSULTING -LABOR _ 14,343 15,000 L _ 10,000 749 - 3450 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES _ _980 _ 10,000 _10,000 130,000 750 3451 CONTRACTUAL SVCS -COURT 1,022 2,375 10,000 10,000 751 3452 4070 CONTRACTUAL SVCS -CODE E TRAVEL &_CONFERENCE - - - - 1,673 15,000 1,200 18000 t 1,200 _ -- --- 1_,200 7s2 - 836 - 753 ______5210_ SUPPLIES _ - 0 250 _ - _ - - 250 754 5410 - - MEMBERSHIPS & SUB_ SCRIPTI - - -- �-- - - 532 - 800 - -- _250 800 - - - --800 755 756 757 - TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES - - - - TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE $229,491 $229,491 --$-226,6261 - - $382,250 758 - -- - - - - $226,625 - - $382,250 $382,250 760 7st 762 6420 CAPITAL OUTLAY_ EQUIPMENT OFFICE - CAPITAL OUTLAY - $0 t - $0 - _ $0 - $0 -- 1 - ---- -- - - _$0 - - - -. - $0 763 �- - _TOTAL 764 765 766 _ __ - rTOTAL EXPENDITURES - - $229,491 $226 -625 _ $382 -250 -- --$382,250 - -- 7s7 766 BUDGETED POSITIONS 0 *i - - r j - �* - - -- - 769 770 * CITY ATTORNEY CURRENTLY RETAINED UNDER CONTRACT - 771 772 - __ -- - 773 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED � •N RECYCLES RACER - -- - -- --- -- CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B" C I D I J 774 CITY ATTORNEY i -/ __ 775 BUDGET COMMENTS 776 -- 'F/Y 2003-2004 - 777 7781 ACCT. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PROPOSED 779 NO 780 7e1 782 , 3 1500 514. -3120 LEGAL SERVICES - RETAINER , _'___________97,000 -- - - - - - - - -- - - - 783 1500 -514 -3410 LEGAL SERVICES -NON RETAI 80,00 - J - 1500- 514 !CONSULTING- TELECOMMUNIC' 20,000 7e5 -3420 - 787 15_00 -514 -3435 CONSULTING -REAL PROP /FOR 15,000 + 788 --- -- -- - - -- -- - -- - -- - 789 1500- 514- 344000NSULTING -LABOR ATTORN , _ 10,000 �_— 791 1500- 514 -3_450 iCONTRACTUAL SERVICES 130,0000 792 793 794 1600-514-3451 CONTRACTUAL SVCS -COURT 10,000 795 1500 - 5_14 -3452 CONTRACTUAL SVC_CODE EN _ 18,000 796 - - - - - = - - - - - - - - - -� 797 1500-514 .4070 - - - TRAVEL& CONFERENCES - - -- -- -- - ,200 _ - - - - - - 79e (_ _ 799 1500- 514 -6210 !SUPPLIES 250 - - -- - - — 801 1500 - 514- 5410�MEMBERSHIPS _ & SUBSCRIPTI- � _ 800 - - 802 � r 803 804 - LTOTAL 805 806 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C D J 807 8o8 FUND GENERAL BLDG, ZONING & COMMUNITY _ _ 116 DEPARTMENT 8os DIVISION BUILDING _ - -- - 810 FUNCTION PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS 524 _ - - _ DEPARTMENT'S CITY - - MANAGER'S 812 813 814 ACCTCCOUNT - NO CLASSIFICATION ACTUAL EXPENDITURES 2001 2002 ADOPTED BUDGET 2002 -2003 _ REQUESTS_ 2003 -2004 RECOMMENDATIONS _ 2003 81s - - -2004 - 816 817 1210 SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS SALARIES& - REGULA _ 128,737 $132,621 818 1410 _WAGES OVERTIME _ _$146,283 _ $142,501 819 - 53 - 3,000 � 6,000 2,500 -- - a2o 821 TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES_1 $128,790 -- - $135,621 - $152,283 - $145,001 -- 822 2110 F. I. C. A. 11,582 18,465 11,650 - 17,655 823 _ 2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 10,803 12,040 - 13,825 14,681 824 - -- - a2s 826 - TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE - 175 - $166,126 - $177,758 - - - - $177,337 827 - - - -- SERVICES & SUPPLIES_ - 828 829 3150+CONTRACT ' 3450 INSPECTORS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:! 118,025 - 5,353 $126,1100 5,000 $126,100 �- - -- 25,000 $126,100_ 20,000 830 4070 TRAVEL & NC _CONFEREE _ 666 _' 6001 1,500 831 __-,------.4080 4630 521�SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE- EDUCATION MAINTENANCE & REP -COMM - -- - _ 231 E 638 - 1,782 _ _2_,350 660 = -- 2 240 -1,500 _ 2,500 _ 700 - 6,000 _ 1,000 __ - p -- 832 833 834 5220 UNIFORMS_ - -' 0 - p 1 <- - 0 - -- 1,500 835 836 _5410,MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI TOTAL SERVICES 662 _ 1,275 _ _ _ 1,800 0 800 - - - 838 & SUPPLIES - $127,357 - $138,225 - - $163,600 - -- - $1501900 83s 840 841 -- TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE - -- - - - $278,532 $304,351 - - $341,358 - - - - -- - - - --$328,237 - 842 6420 EQUIPMENT OFFICE $0 $0 aa3 6430 EQUIPMENT OPERATING - 0 } _ _ _ _ $8.00 J __ $800 - 844 84s e4s - -- - - -- rTOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY -$0� - 650 $650 � m - _ $800 0 -- -- - - - - _ $800 847 84a TOTAL EXPENDITURES - BUDGETED POSITIONS $278 -532 {� - _ $305 -001 - - $342 -158 _ -- - - - _ $329 037 '_ -- -- 3 849 sso 851 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON - - - - -- - -- CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C D I J ss2 - BUILDING DIVISION BUDGET COMMENTS 853 _ - - - - 855 856 857 858 ACCT. -ACCOUNT NO. - - DESCRIPTION - PROPOSED - - - - - - - - 859 860 1610 - 524 -1210 - SALARIES - REGULAR $142,501 DIRECTOR & 2 STAFF - sst - _ 1610- 524 - 1410 - (OVERTIME - 60 _ 2,500 - - - - 862 863 1610- 524 -2110 F.I.C.A. - _ 17,655 - - - - - - - -- ssa _ + MECHANICAL INSPECTOR_ 865 1610- 524 -2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 14,681 PLUMBING INSPECTOR ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR 866 — -- rte' - CONTRACT INSPECTORS _ f 867 1610-624-316.0 126,100 - - BLDG /R00_F INSPECTOR _ STRUCTURAL ENGINEER - -- -- - ------ - - ass 869 - 1610- 524 -3450 - - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES _ - - - -- - - _ 20,000 SPECIAL INSPECTIONS /REVIEW - -- 870 871 1610_- 524 -4070 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE_ 1,500 4-L - ASSOC OF OCCUP LIC OFCL - - - - 872 _T- �rCONSTRUCTION - SEMINAR - - 873 _ - -�- - -- - 874 16_10 - 524 -40801 EMPLOYE_ E - EDUCATIO_N _ _ 1,000 !BLDG OFFICIAL CERTFCTN 875 676 877 1610 - 524- 5210 SUPPLIES - - __ _�TUITN 11500 J REIMBSMN_T_(30 a�$50eaj _ -- - - - -- 878 879 1610-524-5410 - -- MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI -- - - - - 800 -- AMERICAN INST OF ARCHITECTS 1 -- - - - - -.- - 88o 1610-624-6420 OFFICE EQUIPMENT � - 881 - - - - 800 -- - 2 FILE CABINETS _ - - -T - - - -- 882 - TOTAL - - �- -- — - - — - - $329,037 863 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER asa -- - - - -- - - - - -` - - - CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C D I J 885 FUND_ GENERAL _ _ 01 888 DEPARTMENT BLDG, ZONING & COMMUNITY 16 887 DIVISION GEN ADMINISTRATN & PLANNL' 20 - - -- - 888 FUNCTION PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS 524 889 - - -- - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - '- CITY 890 _ ACTUAL EXPE_NDIT_URES- ADOPTED I BUDGET _ _ DEPARTMENT'S REQUESTS MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATIONS 891 ACCT ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION - - - - 2001 2002 - - -- - 892 NO 2002 -2003 - -- ---2003-2004----------------- 2003 2004 893 - -- -- - - -- - 894 89s _ 1210 SALARIES &FRINGE BENEFITS SALARIES &WAGES REGULA 8se - 1410 - OVERTIME _ $289,839 _ 432 - $253,445 2,000 $2_67,474 _ 1,000 $294,831 - 1,000 897 c ssa 899 _ TOTAL SALARIES &WAGES t - - - -- 290,271 fi 255,445 - -- 268,474 - - 295,831 - -- - - -- -- 900 2110 F. I C A. H -EALTH _ 22,530 19,542 20,538 -- - t 901 2310 GROUP INSURANCE _ 18,178--.-----24,044 - 22,310 29,399 902 903 - - �- TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE _ - $330,979 _ $299,031 $311,322 - $347,861 905 SERVICES &SUPPLIES - 908 3100 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 650 $10,000 $5,000 907 _- 3450 34801 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES ER_VIC_ES MICROFILMING 42,913+ 43,269 _ 46,800 _ 46,800 908 _ _ _ 0 2,500 30,000 30,000 sos 910 _ 4070 4080 TRAVEL & CONFER_ENCE EMPLOYEE-EDUCATION f -- 1,954 849 2,000 1,000 _ _ 2,000 1,000 _ 500 MAIN_TENAN_CE -_ - . -- 911 4630 �_ & REP -COMM E _ 1,410 1,000 _ 2,000 1 s1z s13 ____621 0 5410 SUPPLIES _ -_ _ -_ MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI 2,933 - 2,131 _ 3,000 _ 1,600 2,000 915 TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES $52,840 $59,369 $96,800 -- - - - -- - - $89,500 916 - -- 917 918 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE - - -- $383,819 _ $358,400 - $408,122 - - $437,361 919 CAPITAL OUTLAY - 920 921 6420 6430 EQUIPMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT - - 338 _ $0 - - - - - -$ ®� - - - - _ $0. 922 OPERATING - -0 _ p - - 1,300 p - - - 923 sea TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY _ - $338 -� -- -- - - $p 925 ______TOTAL _ EXPENDITURES $384,157 $358,400 $409,422 $437,361 926 927 928 - BUDGETED POSITIONS _ _ - - -- -- -6� 929 ITHIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER - CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A -, B C I D I J 930 GEN ADMINISTRATN & PLANNING _ — — - -- 931 932 _ _ — — BUDGET COMMENTS F/Y 2003- 2004 - — -- 933 - 93a 935 ACCT. NO. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PROPOSE- D - - -- - - -- - — 936 - - - -- -- - - 937 938 1620- 524 -1210 SALARIES -REGULAR $294,831 DIRECTOR & 5 STAFF } 939 1620- 524 -1410 OVERTIME 1,000 940 1620 - 524 -2110 - F.1 C.A. — — 22,631 _ - - -- - f - - - - 941 942 943 944 1620 -524 -2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 29,399 -- — - - 945 1620 -5.24 -3100 5,000 - - - - PLANNING/TRAFFIC ANALYSIS------ -- - - - - PROFESSIONAL` SERVICES - 946 - sa7 1620 -524 -3450 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES _ 46,800 PLANNING CONSULTANT _ - 948 __ $30@60 HRS 26 PERIODS 7 -YR BACKLOG MICROFILMING - - gas 1620 -524 -3480 - - - 30,000 950 9s1 1620- 524 -4070 !MICROFILMING TRAVEL & CONFERENCE 2,000 - - - AIA. CONFERENCE - 952 _ APA CONFERENCE 953 1620- 524 -4080 - - ' EMPLOYEE - EDUCATION— - - - - 500 -- PLANNING SEMINARS &--CLASSES---- CLASSES - - 954 -- - -- - - 955 1620 - 524 -4630 MAINTENANCE -COMM . E PT - - -- Q - -- - - 956 — 957 sss 1620 -524 -5210 SUPPLIES _ 2,500 PRINTER & FAX CARTRIDGES COPY MACHINE CARTRIDGES _ 1620 - 524 -5410 sss M EMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI - 1,700 AIA, APA/AICP, DADE CNTY MGRS 960 �ASSOC,PLANNING ADVISORY SVC 961 962 1620 - 524 -6420 -- I-- O FFICE EQUIPMENT p r — 963 TOTAL — -- —_ $437,361 - _ — Z L -- �_ =' -O_- — -- -- ._ - - - - -- - -- THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B!; C D 966 FUND_ ' GENERAL 01 967 968 DEPARTMENT DIVISION : BLDG, ZONING &COMMUNITY CODE ENFORCEMENT _' 16 40� _ 969 FUNCTION_ _ CODE ENFORCEMENT 624 -- - 970 -- - - - - - CITY 971 _ - - ACTUAL - - L ADOPTED DEPARTMENT'S - MANAGER'S ACCT NO " ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURES 2001 -2002 972 973 BUDGET 2002 -2003 REQUESTS' 2003 -2004 RECOMMENDATIONS 2003 -2004 974 „I �- -- - -- ' --1- -- - -- --- - - 975 SALARIES &FRINGE BENEFITS 976 977 978 _ 1210 14101 SALARIES & WAGES - REGULA SALARIES & WAGES - OVERTI _ $164,816 166 _ $172,734 - 2,500 $180,215 - 2,225 $179,912 - 2,225 97s 980 981 _ 2110 _ TOTAL SALARIES &WAGES F..1 C. A. $164,982 1_ 12,601 $175,234 }_ $182,440 - _ $1$2,137 - - 982 983 2310 - --T- - GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE - - - 14,303 - 13,405 _ 17,523 13,957 - 16,585 ___ 13,933 - 19,557 9aa -_ TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE - $191 886 $ 206162 _ $212,982 - - - $215,627 986 __ 4070 SERVICES & SUPPLIES TRAVEL & CO_NFERENCE_ $424 1 $812 -- - 987 -- - , -- - $1,250 $1,000 3_95 f 988 4080 EDUCATION f _520 2,290 _ 1,000 989 4620 MAINTENANCE &'REP OPER. E�_ 201 510 540 _ 540 s90 991 4630 5_210 MAINTENANCE & REP -COMM. SUPPLIES 2,139 0 0 p 992 5220 UNIFORMS 2,314 9,250 - 3,603 2,500 993 _ 5410jMEMBERSHIPS _ &'SUBSCRIPTI - - - _ 86 _- 90I - _ 90 423 I 3701 423 370:.. 994 sss i TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES �- 5,649 -- - 3,862 -- - -_ 8,476 5,833 -- -- - sss 997 sss TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE _ - $197,535 -- $210,024 - - - - $221,458 - t $221,460 - -- 999 -- _ 6420 - - -- - CAPITAL OUTLAY OFFICE EQUIPMENT a A- - loon _ _ 0 $0� _ 0 $390 500.1 - _ __ $390 - 1001 1002 _ 6430 OPERATING EQUIPMENT_ _ 3381 1003 1004 - - - - - - - -- - - ._ _ -- - $338 - - $0 -- _ - $890 I -- -- $890 - - 1o0s 1006 1007 _ _ TOTAL EXPENDITURES BUDGETED POSITIONS f $1 - $210,024 - - G- - $222,348 - s - $222,350 -- - _ - - loos THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 1006 THIS DIVISION'S BUDGET IS BEING TRANSFERRED FROM PUBLIC WORKS FOR 2002/03 FISCAL YEAR 1o10 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C D I J 1o11 CODE ENFORCEMENT 1012 1013 BUDGET COMMENTS 2003-2004 1014 - --'-� — � --- 3 10151 lots 1017 ACCT. NO. _ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION _ —— — PROPOSED -- - - - -- r - - - - -- - -- - lol8i 1640 -524 -1210 SALARIES - REGULAR _$179,912ICODE ENFCMNT MGR & 3 CODE ENFCMNT OFCR_S 1019 102011640-524-1410 SALARIES &WAGES - OVERTI 2,225 1021 — _ 102211640-624-2110 - F. I. C. A. - - 13,9_3.3 - - - -- - -- -- - ; 1023 1024 1640-524-2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE - 19,557 1025 1026 1027 1640 - 524 -_4070 -- - 1640 - 524 -4080 TRAVEL _& CONFERENCE — — — EMPLOYEE EDUCATION 3 - 1,000 1^000 - -- - - - — -- - - - T 1028 1029 L_ 1030 1640-624-4620 524 -4_620 ; MAINTENANCE &REP -OPER. E 540 MAINTENANCE OF 3 CAMERAS -- 1031 1032 1033 1640-624-5210 SUPPLIES !UNIFORMS - 2,600 1INK CARTRIDGES & OTHER SUPPLIES CFOR - 103a 1035 1640- 524 -5220 — - _ 42_3 3 CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS - -- 1036 1037 1038 -..— 1640 524 -5410 1640 - 524 -6420 iMEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI OFFICE EQUIPMENT 370 390!, - - 1 4-DRAWER FILE CABINET i - - - -- - - -- -- -- - - -- — - - -- 1039 1040 1041_ 1640 - 524 -6430 I OPERATING EQUIPMENT - - 500 - - -� � - i DIGITAL CAMERA - - - - — - -._ io42 -- TOTAL - -- - - { i- $222,350 - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - 1043 _ -- --- =__ 1o44 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B "C p 1o45 FUND GENERAL 1046 1047 DEPARTMENT DIVISION PUBLIC WORKS - SUMMARY 17 XX 1o4a FUNCTION - -- PHYSICAL ENVIRMNT /GENRL XXX t - _ - - -- 1049 CITY 1050 ACTUAL ADOPTED DEPARTMENT'S MANAGER'S 1051 _ ACCT !ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURES BUDGET ---------2-0-0-3---2--0-0-4-------------2-0-0'3---2--0 REQUESTS RECOMMENDATIONS 1052 NO 2001_ -2002 2002-2003 04 1053 - -- - - - -- - - 1054 SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS - _ _ 1055 1210 1410 _A_LARIES & WAGES - REGULAR _ � --I- OVERTIME $1,163 627 � _ _ $1,096,333 1 498 348 � - $ � � _ $1,204,315... 1o56 1057 10581 - TOTAL SALARIES _& WAGES 43,972 $1,207,599 - 28,100 $1,123,433 { _ 48,4003 T $1,546,748 ___29,400- $1,233,715 10591 imol 2110 2310 F.1. C. A. ' GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 911808 105,686 85,943 113,395 _ 118,326_ 168,732 - _ 150,829 1061 1062 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE $1,405,093 -_ $1,322,771L $1,833,806 $1,478,923 1063 1064 1065 3100�PROFESSIONAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES SERVICES -- - 1066 _ _ 3150 ENGINEERING - $8,119 3_ 800 0 _$20,000 _ 0 _ $10,000 0` 1067 3450 3470 4070 4080 CONTRACTUAL INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT -RE TRAVEL &_CONFERENCE EDUCATION ± 45,280 81,000 1,846 1,802 101,628 80,000 1,724 6,566 _ 227,013 89,000 A500 8,900: _ 81,400__ 84,000 _ 2,250 3,850 1068 1069 1070 1071 4310 UTILITIES - ELECTRIC _ 701486 68,000 - 72,000 70,000 1072 4320 43-401-REFUSE UTILITIES -WATER 7,956 12,000 17,000 - 12,000 1073 DISPOSAL FEE _ LEASE PURCHASE- EQUIPME_N 509,866 _ 0 _ 475,000 0 536,456, 1,500 520,000 1074 _ 441 1075 _44651 LEASE PURCHASE TRUCKS _45,483 42,940 _ 134,507 _ 1591692 1076 4620jMAINT & REP.-OPERATING E t 921 _ 1,500 1,500 1,000 1077 4625 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE - _ 0 _______3y840 4,753 0� 3,240 20,000 45,000 3,920 15,000 55,000 500 14,000 1078 4630 MAINT & REP.-COMM. EQUIP. MAINT & REP: SIRS & PKWAY 1079 4640 1080 4650 PARKS &' STREETS ELECTRICI 83,324 87,000 90,000 87,000 10e1 4670 MAINT &REP. - GROUNDS & ST 39,390 _ 49,000 61,805 50,500 1082 loss 4680 5210 5220 MAINT & REP - OUTSIDE SERVI SUPPLIES UNIFORMS _ 67,122 12,632 8,367 60,000 13,072 11,263 75,000 26,400 15,315 65,000 20,650 13 915 1088 1085 :10861 5230TFUEL 5240 & LUB PARTS _ 124,350 _47,706 140,000 _ 63,000 1601000 61,500 140,000 _ 551000 1087 1088 5245 _ 5250 � TOOLS � - -- - - -� TIRES _ 629 _ 19,478 500 1 25,000 _ 1 500 23,500 1,000 20,000 loss 5260 CHEMICALS /SUPPLIES 7,781 9,000 1090 - 5270 -_ PERMITS - 817 -_ - 9,000 9,000 1091 5410 MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI -- 1,678 t 1,260 - 1,760 - - - 1,260 1092 1os3 TOTAL SERVICES &SUPPLIES' $1,195,425 -- $1,292,3_53 3 1 $1,702,826 $1,47_8,767 1094 1095 1096 _ 6420 6430 - -. _ _ TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE CAPITAL OUTLAY EQUIPMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT OPERATING _ - - - $2,600,518 $0 _ $1,138 $2,615,124 1 $0 - $07 $3,536,632 $5,000 - $214,596 - - - - "-$2 957 690 $0, - $51,250 - 1097 lose 1099 1100 - - TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY � $1,138 - - - $219,5961 $51,250 1101 1102 1103 _ '_ � TOTAL EXPENDITURES $2,601,656 ' $2,615,124 � $3,756,228! -��! - $3,008,940 -_�- 1104 _ THIS PAGE IS PRINTED BU_DGE_T_ ED POSITIONS ON 34 _ 28 421 33 - 11o5 RECYCLEDPAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C I p 11o6 1107 FUND GENERAL _ PUBLIC WORKS 01 17i --1 _ DEPARTMENT 11o8 DIVISION BUILDING MAINTENANCE 10 11os FUNCTION OTHER GENERAL GOVT. SVCS 519 1110 - - - - - -- - - -- -- - - -- CITY 1111 1112 ACCT ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION ACTUAL EXPENDITURES - ADOPTED DEPARTMENT'S MANAGER'S BUDGET REQUESTS RECOMMENDATIONS 1113 _ NO _ - 2001 2002 2002 -2003 2003-2004 - _ 2003 -2004 1114 1115 1210 - SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS SALARIES - - 1116 1117 - 1410 &WAGES - REGULA _ $149,650 OVERTIME 4,259- $189,237 4,500 $258,845 $143,225 6,000 1118 1119 J 'TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES $153,909 - - $193,737 -- $264,845 - - - - -. $149,225 1120 - - - - 1121 - 2110 F I. C. _A. 11,565 14,821 - 20,261 1122 1123 1124 - 2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE_ iTOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE 19,336 - --- - -- 16,478 23,902 r $2_32_,4604 _ 37,418 - 1125 _ 3450 4080IEDUCATION - SERVICES & SUPPLIES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES _$181,952 $44,743 01 - r _ $65,000 192 $322,524 $129,385 _ 750 $179,977 -- _ $201000 I 350 112s 1127 1128 1129 4310 4320 1 UTILITIES- ELECTRIC rUTILITIES-WATER 70,485 68,000 -d 1 r 72,000 _ 70,000 1130 1131 _ 4620 46301 ;_ MAINT &_REP.- OPERATING EQ MAINT & REP. -COMM. EQPT. 7,956 545 _ 615 12,000 - 500 _ 720 _ _ 17,0001 500 _ 720 12_,000 1 _ 500 0 1132 1133 4670�MAINT & REP.- GROUNDS & ST 39,390 49,000 56,805 _ _ 489000 1134 1135 5210 - - 5220 SUPPLIES - UNIFORMS - - - - 9,2_3_0 1,061 - - 8,000 - 1,800 17,000 - _ 3,150 15,000 1 800 - -- -' 1136 1137 1138 1139 - yTOTAL SERVICES &SUPPLIES TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE _ - $174,025 - $297,310 { $167,650 1140 _ - _ - -- - - $355,977 $437,672I - - - $619,834 -- - - - - $347,627 1141 CAPITAL OUTLAY _ - - - - - 11az 6420 - - _ OF FICE EQUIPMENT - -- - - 0 _ $0 t $0 - $0 1143 6430 OPERATING EQUIPMENT - - -1,138 - 0 3,900 - -- C 3,900 1144 1145 1146 ---------TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY - _ $0 (_ - - $3,900 -- - - $3,900 1147 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $357,115 $437,672 ° 1148 _ - - -- BUDGETED POSITIONS - - -- 6- 6 ___ $623,734 0 $351;527 - -- 1149 11,501 1151 ON RECYCLED PAPER+ - j _ - -- - -- - -- -- -- - THIS PAGE IS PRINTED CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A 8 C D I J 1152 BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUDGE_T COMM_ENTS - - 1153 _ 1154 F/Y 2003_ -2004 _V — — -- - -- 1155 1156 1157 A_ CC_T. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PROPOSED - - - -- - - -- - 1158 1159 1160 1161 1710-519-1210 1710419=1410 SALARIES -REGULAR OVERTIME _$143,225 6,000 — - - - -..- -- - -- 1163 1164 1710 -519 -2110 F.I.C.A. - - - - - - - - -- -- 1165 17'10-5f9_-23t6nROUP HEALTH INSURANCE '- — =— 1166 - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - -- - - - - -- 1167 1710-619-3450 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES — — - - 20,000 1168 1710- 519 -4080 1710- 519 -4310 — r - EMPLOYEE EDUCATION - -- UTILITES- ELECTRIC -- UTILITIES WATER - — - - 350 - 12,00 - — - 0 _ - - — -- — - - - - - - - 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1710- 519 -4320 -- 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1710- 519.4620 -- 17_10- 519 -463_0 'MI �- MAINT & REPAIR OPER EQUIP -- - - HINT & REPAIR -COMM. EQPT 500 - - 0 — -- 48,000 15,000 - - — — - - - - - — — -- - - — - - - - - - - — - -- -- -- - 117s 11e0 _�_ 1710- 519 -4670 !MAINT - 1710 -519 -5210 - & REPAIR -GDS & STRU SUPPLIES _ _ - 1181 1182 11a3 1710 - 519 -522 UNIFORMS _� - -- - - - - - -- -- - - 1185 OPERATING EQUIPMENT - - - - 1,800 }' - - - -- - - 1710- 519 -6430 -- - 1186 - - -- - - - TOTAL ON RECYCLED`PAPER - — - $351,52 7 - - _ - - - -- — - - - - - -- 1187 1188 1189 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B, D D I J 11so FUND_ _ GENERAL 11x1 DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS - 1t92 DIVISION SOLID WASTE COLLECTION 20 YSICAL ENVIRON PH MENT --1 534 - - -- -- -- 1193 FUNCTION _ 1194 1195 1196 " ACCT ___ACCOUNT - -� - - ACTUAL CLASSIFICATION _EXPENDITURES - ADOPTED BUDGET - -- DEPARTMENT'S REQUESTS_ _ CITY - - MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATIONS 1197 NO 2001 -2002 -r 2002 -2003 - - - 2003 -2004 2003- 2004 1198 SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS SALARIES & WAGES - REGULA $432,778 OVERTIME 33,095 - -_ - $407,283 - -� $509,091 26,000 i-- - - - - - - I $424,971 - - - 10,000 1199 t2oo 1201 1202 1210 1410 1203 _ TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES $465,873 -- - - - - $425,083 - - -- $535,091 - $434,971 1204 -- 1205 1206_--- 1207 - 2110 2310, - - - 35,473 F I. C. A. _ 32,519 46,622 _ 40,934 - 58,570 - - 33,275 58,403 - - -_ GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 46,828 -- - 12oe 1209 - - TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE r SERVICES & SUPPLIES - -- $526, 649 - $548,174 - - $504,224 - - $634,595 - 1210 1211 - 3470 INTERLO_CALAGREEMENT -RE - - $81,000j - $80,000 $89,000 t $84,000 1212 4080 - - _ 4340 _ 445_5 EDUCATION - REFUSE DISPOSAL FEE LEASE PURCHASE TRUCKS �- - p - - -- _ 509,8_66 - 200 475,000 - -- 250 536,456 '- - - 250 - - 520,000 1213 1214 1215 _ 5210 + SUPPLIES _ p - -0 99_7 j- - - -- 0 1,000 _ _ _ 0 _ 107,184 1,000 1219 1z 1217 5220 UNIFORMS - _ _ - 3,681 - 4, - 548 _ -- -- 5,000 - - - - 5,000 1218 _ _ -TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES - $595,544 $560,748 $631,956 1219 1220 1221 - TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE - - - $1,143,7181 $1,064,972 - - - $1,266,551 - - -- $717,434 -- -- $1,244,083 1222 1223 6430 CAPITAL OUTLAY OPERATING EQUIPMENT - -- -- - - -- � " -- -- " -- $p 1224 1225 _ ' - - _(TOTAL r CAPITAL OUTLAY �- - -- -- - $0 $0 $p - - _ $0 1226 1227 -------.-----TOTAL - EXPENDITURES - _ -� J -- -- -_ 1' _- $1,143,718 - $1,064,972 -- t $1,266,551 - $1,244,083 1228 1229 1230 - _ BUDGETED ONS_ � - POSITI - _ 15 - -- - 12 - 15�I - - - t- -- - - - 14 1231 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER I I - - -- - - CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET 1232 1233 ------SOLID WASTE COLLECTION BUDGET COMMENTS FIY 2 003 -2 004 — — — — -- - - 1234 _ 1235 -- - - - - - - - 1236 ACCT. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PROPOSED 1237 1238 NO. - -- - - - -- -- -- - - 1239 17234 -1 0 - 5 210 _ — _ - - - (SALARIES -REGULAR EAR — -- - — 1240 1241 1242 1720- 5341410 — 1720 - 534 =2110 - — — -- 10,000 275 — — — � — -- — — - — - - -- -- .: - - — OVERTIME -- 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1720- 534 -2310 1720 - 534 -3470 - GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT -RE -- 58,403 84,000 - - — -- - - -- - 1248 12as 1720 - 534 -4080 - EMPLOYEE EDUCATION - - - -- - - 250 -- - - -- -- 1250 1251 i 1720 - 534- 4340'REFUSE - - - — DISPOSAL FEE 520,000 -- - - - -- - - 1252 1253 1720- 534- 4455 1 - _ — !LEASE PURCHASE-TRUCKS -- - 107,184 — - KNUCKLE BOOM NEW EQPTS. ANNUAL_ PAYMENTS 24,013 1254 1255 1256 12571720- 534- 6.210 — — — — SUPPLIES _ 1TRA_SH — - 1,000 `- 15,063 68,108 - — — - TRUCK -- -- _ _ t2 AUTOMATED GARBAGE TRUCKS � -- _ all at 2.99% for 5 earl - � 1258 - - - -� _ -- - - - - - -- - 1259 1260 - 1720-634-6220 UNIFORMS -- - - 5 '000 - -- -- - -- - -- 1261 1262 - -- - -- 1263 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C p � d izs4 FUND GENERAL _ 01 1265 DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS " 17 - 1266 1267 -- - - DIVISION FUNCTION -- STREET & LANDSCAPE MTCE OTHER GENERAL GOVT. SERV _ _ _ 30 541 - - -- 1266 _ ACTUAL _ EXPENDITURES ADOPTED - + BUDGET - 2002 -2003 _ DEPARTMENT'S - - REQUESTS 2003 -2004 _ CITY + MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATIONS 2003-2004 1299 ACCT - ACCOUNTCL ASSIFICATION 1270 1271 NO 2001- 2002 1272 $39,139 $40,656 - $253,95 - - $192,925 1273 1274 _ 1_210 SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS SALARIES &WAGES - REGULA 1275 1410 OVERTIME 3,113 0 10;900 - -- _ - - - - - -- - 8,900 1276 1277 TOTAL SALARIES &WAGES $40,656 $264,857 -- $201,825 1279 1280 2110 2310iGROUP �F 1 C. A. ` HEALTH INSURANCES _ _3,212 - -- - 3,110 - - - 20,262 - -- -- 15,440 1281 _- TOTAL 3,330 r 3,783 - - 28,803 _ 28,879 - - 1282 1283 - PERSONNEL SERVICE - - - $48,794 - $47,549 - - $313,922�II - - $246144 - - 46, 128a - - SERVICES &SUPPLIES ,CONTRACTUAL - 1285 3450 -- - 4080 SERVICES EDUGATION $0 0 _ $0� 200 _ $36,000 $36,000 - - - ^9,000 1289 1287 - 4455 LEASE PURCHASE TRUCKS -- 1,400 12, 309 6,878 1288 _ _ 4625fLANDSCAPE _ 4630 MAINTENANCE MAINT & REP -COMM. EQUIP ME _ 0 _ 0 _ _ + 45,000 _ 55,000 1249 1290 1291 - 4640 4650�ELECTRICITY MAINT & REP -STRS & PARKW� i 4,753 f 20,000 = - - 15,000 14,000 - - -- 1292 4670�MAINT 5210ISUPPLIES _ _ - _ & REP -GRDS & STRUCT _ - 83,324 - 0~ 1,342 87_,000 0 1,350 90,000 5 000 - 2,850 _ 87,000 - 2,500 2,850 1293 1294 1295 52201UN_IFORMS -- -- 5245�TOOLS _ 400 __ 750 - 3,000 -- - 2,950 _� - - 0 - 0 1,000 � 500 1296 TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES - - $89,819 - $109,300 J - - - $211 409 j - -' -- - -- $208,678 1297 1298 1299 1300 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE h -- _$13- 8613 $156,849 _ $52 -- $454,822 1301 _ CAPITAL OUTLAY ICE -- _- - - - -- - - -- 1302 6420 -- . EQUIPMENT �- - = I - - -$04 - = $� - -- - - - - $0 - - - $�- 1303 6430 OPERATING EQUIPMENT - - - -- - - - -- -0 - - - -O -- - 170,000 - -- - 10,000 13oa 1305 - DOTAL +� CAPITAL OUTLAY 1306 1307 - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $01 - $138,613 _ -$0 $156,849 - - $170,000 331 -- - $10,000 1308 - - - _ $695 - -- ' -- $464,822 1309 1310 ttBUDGETED POSITIONS ._.01 -_- _ - _ - � - - - - - 1311 1312 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER - - -- - -- - - 1_ 1 - 1313 THIS DIVISIONS BUDGET IS COMBINED WITH THE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE $UDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003 /2004 1314 IN ACCORDANCE' WITH THE CHANGE OF ORDINANCE APPROVED IN JUNE 2003. __ _._ CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET c B C D I J r _ _ STREET_ MAINTENANCE BUDGET COMMENTS _ —- 1320 I -r-- — CT. — ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION FIY 2003 -2004 - - PROPOSED - _ - -- - 1321 1322 1323 _ 1730 - 541- 1210SALARIES - -- - REGULAR _ ! $192,925 - _ 132a 1325 1326]1730-541-2110 1730 7541 -1410 OVERTIME —_ F.I C.A. — - — _ 81900 15,440 — _ — -_ - - 1327 1328 1730-641-2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 28,879 - - -- L - - 1329 1330 1331 1730- 541 -3160 'ENGINEERING 36,000 - 1730 - 541-40 0 MPLOYEE EDUCATION 000 E1332 1730 - 541-4455 LEASE PURCHASE - TRUCKS 6,—� 13371 1730- 541 -4625 - — — --- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE — — -- -- — - 1338 1730 - 541- 4640MAINT &REP. STREETS & PAR 14;000 CONCRETE STREET ALONG CITY STREETS SIGNS 134o 1341 1730- 541 -4650 ELECTRICITY _ _ 87,000 1342 1730 - 541- 4670'MAINT. & REP -GDS & STRUCT 20500' 1343 1344 1730-641-52101 SUPPLIES i - 2,850 - — — - - — -- - - -- -- 1345 1346 1730- 541 -5220 UNIF_ ORMS t' - - 1348 1346 1730-541-6220 UNIFORMS _ 500 r -- — 1350 .1730 - 541 -6430 — OPERATING EQUIPMENT I —_ — - 10,000PAVEMENT MARKING EQPT 1351 _ __— BILLY GOAT &SIGN INSTALLER 1352 1353 J TOTAL $464,822 -- _ -- 1354 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER — — — - — — CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B_ I D 1463 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 1484 BUDGET COMMENTS 1485 - - — — - F/Y 2003 2004 - -- - 1 - - 1486 1467 1488 ACCT NO.- ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION CPROPOSED - 1489 — - - - - - -- -- -- — - - - - -- - - - - 1490 1491 1760 519 -1210 SALARIES REGULAR $154,965 1492 1760 519 -1410 IOVER_TIME -- 4,000 1493 - - �- 1494 - 1760-519-2110 F.I.C.A. — _ -T 12,161 - 1495 1496 - - 1760-519-2310" "GROUP - - - -- HEALTH INSURANCE - - 19,436 _ - - _. -- I 1497 - — ' 1498 76_50-0- 10-519 =4080 EDUCATION 500 - lass _ ANNUAL PAYMENTS 1500 1760 - 519 -4455 ;LEASE PURCHASE - TRUCKS 45,630 ' CRANE ; EXISTING EQPTS. - -- - - 18,611 1501 _ - --_ -. -- i_ _ __ !TRASH TRUCK - 13,852 1502 I _ (FORD F15041M ! 6,580 1503 r ------ � t - FORDF150- AN'_: - - - 6,587 1504 15o5 1760- 519 =4620 II - - - MAINT & REP - OPERAT EQUIP - - 500 C - - - - - - j 1506 1507 1760 519_ -4630 MAINT & REP -COMM EQMT - - -- - - 500 - - 1508 15o9 1760- 5194680 -- � MAINT & REP - OUTSIDE SER. 65,000 r 1510 -- 1511 1760-519-6220 UNIFORMS — 4,165 1512 1513 1514 1760 -519 -5230 — FUEL & L UB. - - - - � - -- - - _ 140,000 - - - ' - - — -- - - -- 1515 1760-519 -5240 — ( PARTS - - -- 55,0_00 1 IM-- 1sw 1760-619-6245 TOOLS - - - - 1518 _ -- - - - - 1519 1-76- 0 - 5-19 -5250 - TIRES r - - rr C r 20 a 1521,000 1520 1760-519-5260 - -- CHEMICALS /SUPPLIES — - --. 9,000 , y 1522 - -, 1523 1760 - 519 -6430 EQUIPMENT - OPERATING 35,000 FUEL MGMT SYSTEM_ DIAGNOSTIC SCANNER _ 4 1524 1525 — _ - - TIRE MACHINE] _ _ 1526 - _ F IRE FIRE RATED CABINET - 1527 - - -- - ! 1528 1529 TOTAL _ $566,357 4 - 1s3o THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 38 PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.373 MILLS -1 MILL INCREASE .'.0r": -.. CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A I B C D 1531 FUND ;GENERAL _ _ I' 01 1532 DEPARTMENT !PUBLIC WORKS 17 1533 DIVISION— - -- OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR - 70' 1534 FUNCTION- -- - -- - OTHER GENERAL GOVT. SERV 519± - _ -- - ! 1535 - -'- -- -- -- - - -- - +I _ CITY 1535 { ACTUAL F ADOPTED _ DEPARTMENT'S _ MANAGER'S 1537 1538 ACCT NO ACCOUNT_ CLASIFICATION S EX_PENDITURE_S 2001-2002 BUDGET I—- 2002 2003 - REQUESTS 2003 -2004 - RECOMMENDATIONS 2003 -2004 1539 - 1540 1541 121011SALARIES SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS & WAGES REGULA� $153,760 $160,522 $168,567 $164,552 1542 — 1410 ( OVERTIME 30 800 500 { 500 1543 1544 — -- _ _.. -- _ 'TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES — -- _ 1: $153 790 _- ,_._ $161,322 . - $169,067 - $165,052 1545 lsas 2110 F.1 C. A. - 12,101 12,341 12,934 12,626 1547 2310LGROUP - HEALTH INSURANCE i - - 11,003 13,092 - - 13,032 I 14,812 1548 1549 - - -- - TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE t $1' _76 89_4 1 $186,755 - $195,033 -- - - $192,490 'SERVICES -- 15511 & SUPPLIES _ 1 1552 34501CONTRACTUALSERVICES $470 $1,6281 - $1,6281 $400 1553 4070 'TRAVEL & CONFERENCE i - - - 4 . 974 r 1,000 - 1 750 1554 4080 EDUCATION 0 474 500 - 250 1555 4630 i MAINTENANCE &REP -COMM El -- - 909 ,I l 720 ; 750 0 1555 1557 - 5210 5270, SUPPLIES -- - - - PERMITS' 273 - + 817 � ' 750 -- 720 800 750 { 800 1558 5410 - _ MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPT''; - 178 260 -- 260 260 1559 1560 TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES - - - I $2,661 - ' 1 $3,210 1551 1562 1563 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE -- - — j $179,545 $192,281 $200,721 $195,700 - - 15x4 1565 6420 CAPITAL OUTLAY OFFICE EQUIPMENT $0 - -- 1 i 6430 _ OPERATING EQUIPMENT 0 $0 0 $0 l 750 $0 j 350 1566 - - - 1567 1568 — - TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY - -- -- — - $0 $0 - $750 ;- $350 1559 1570 - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $179,545 I $192,281 $201,471 $196,050 1571 - — - 1572 BUDGETED POSITIONS _— 3 — 3 3 - 3 1573 1574 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 39 PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.373 MILLS -1 MILL INCREASE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C I D l J 1576 _ _ _ — _ _ OFFICE OF P. W. DIRECTOR " 1576 BUDGET COMMENTS 1577 _� _ -- — _; -- tFIY 2003 2004 y i - _- � -- 1579 ACCT. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTIONROPOSED i - 1580 NO -- - - - - _ _ SALARIES -EXECUTIVE i -- - - $164,552 1 DIRECTOR & 2 STAFF - - 1582 1770-519-1110 1583 1584 j 1770 -519- 1410'OVERTIME — _ — 500 - - i 1586 1770 - 519 -2110 ! F.I C A. 12,626 I 1587 - 1588 1770-519-2310! GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE _i 14,812 1589 15so 1770-619-3460! - - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - - 400 - 1 ------------- - + - -- - 1591 - - - - - - - - - L 1592 1770-6`19-4070 _ TRAVEL & CONFERENCES _ _ 750 1593 - - - - 1594 - - 1770 - 519 -4080 — - EMPLOYEE EDUCATION — — - - 750 - - - 1595 1596 1770-619463 0 "- - _ MAINTENANCE & REP-COMM. 0 - 1597 -- - SUPPLIES - 800 -- - - - - - 1598 1770-619-6210 _ 1599 -- _ 1600 1770 - 519 -5270 PERMITS 7.50 y_ { 1so1 1602 1770- 519 -5410 - - MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI - 260 1 1 f - i 1603 ; -- 1604 1770-519-6430 ;OPERATING EQUIPMENT 350 �INKJET PRINTER - 1606 LTOTAL $196,550 1607 - -- _ 16o8 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 40 PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.373 MILLS -1 MILL INCREASE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET 1653 -- - - EN GNRNG,CONSTRCTN - - &STMWATR - 1s5a - -- -- BUDGET COMMENTS - - - 1655 F/Y 2003 -2004 i �_- - 1656 -- - - -- - -- - — - _ -- 1657 _.___.ACCT. DESCRIPTION PROPOSED - 1659 NO { - - - -- - - i - - - - - - 1659 _ 1660 1790-519-1210 -- SALARIES -REGULAR - - $123,677 CITY ENGINEER GIS I 1661 - - - _& 1662 1790 519- 2110F.1 C A. 9,461 - - - - 1663 -- 1664 1790- 519- 2310 !GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 9,963 -- - - 1666 1790 - 519 -3100 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10,000 1667 � ..- 1668 1790- 519 -3450 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 25,000 1669 TRAVEL - - - - - i 1670 1790-519-4070 & CONFERENCE 1,500 1671 -- --- - - I- - - - - 1672 1790-519-4080 - -- EMPLOYEE EDUCATION - - F_ 1,500 � - - - - -- - 1674 1790-519-4455 - LEASE PURCHASE - - - C 1,000 1675 -- - - — - 1676 17_90 -519 -_4630 M_ AINT_ENANCE & REP-COMM_ E� 0 - 1677 1678 1_790 - 519 -5210 SUPPLIES 1,000 1679 > — - 1680 1790-619-5410 MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI - - �... 1,000 - L 1681 1682 1790-519-6420 'OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 - 1683 - -- ( - ----------- - - — - - - - 1684 1790-519-64301 OPERATING EQUIPMENT 25000 MIAMI DADS AERIAL PHOTO 1686 _.:.: - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - & UISMEDIA MAP VIEWS - 1686 1687 TOTAL $186,101 - - 1688 - 1686 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER I - 42 PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.373 MILLS -1 MILL INCREASE �.w .,. CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET � 1862 FUND GENERAL _ _ - _ 011 _ 1863 DEPARTMENT RECREATION - - 201 1864 DIVISION PARKS & RECREATION _ XX 1865 FUNCTION RECREATION ACTIVITIES XXX 1866 - CITY 1867 - - ACTUAL ADOPTED DEPARTMENT'S MANAGER'S 1868 - ACCT ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION_ EXPENDITURES f BUDGET REQUESTS i RECOMMENDATIONS 1866 - NO _ _ - _ 2001 2002 2002 -2003 2003 -2004 2003 -2004 1870 _ - 1871 SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS - - +I 1872 _ 12101SALARIES & WAGES RE_GULA $743,413 $777,164 $776,3351 $739,458 1873 _ 1310 SALARIES & WAGES - PART TI 0 30,000 _ 0 22,800 1874 _ - 1410}OVERTIME - -- 22,465 10,000 _ 2,000 -- 0 1876 - -1 - 187s TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES $765,878 $817,164 _ - i - $778,335 1 � _ $762,258 1877 - 1878 2110 F. l C. A. - 58,618 62,513 59,543 _ 58,313 1876 - 2310LGROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 76,795 98,455 86,191 106,172 1880 - 1881 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE 901 2 1 f $ 9 $978,132 $924 069 + -------- - - -- - - - , 6 $926,743 1882 _ _ - 1883 ISERVICES & SUPPLIES 1888 3130{TENNIS PRO $21,000 $17,735 - $0 - - $0 - -- - _ 1885 3450! CONTRACTUAL SERVICES i 78,662 68,000 55,080 + 37,920 1886 4070 TRAVEL &,CONFERENCE 2,124 1,000 1,000 i 1,000 1887------ 4080 i EDUCATION _ 7_26 f 1_,000 _ _ 0 _ 0 1889 _ 41001 EQUIPMENTAL RENTAL 0 l __ 0 1,752 _ 1-,-762 1889 4120 TELEPHONE SERVICE 0 1 0 5,700 5,700 - - 48 1890 43101 UTILITIES ELECTRICITY 0 0 000 48 } 000 1891 4320�UTILITIES-WATER t 0 1 0 5,00 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1892 4350 ELECTRICITY (CITY PARKS _ 34,781 45,000 43,728 43,728 1893 4420 OUTSIDE SERVICE RENTAL 4,120 4,000 4,000 4,000 1894 _ 4455 LEASE PURCHASE TRUCKS __ 7,952 r 7,952� 12,000 5,500 1895 4620�MAINT & REP - OPERATING EQ 37,108 45,000 Ir 38,555 32,000 1896 _46251 LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS 45,1,28 f 45,000 0 0 1897 4630�MAINT & REPAIRS COMM EQP 1,230 800 1,180 0 - - - 1898 4670CMAINT &REP PARK FACILITIES 10,000 10 000 10,000 _, - 10,000 lsss - 4690lMAINT & REP.-TENNIS FACILIT 2,044 _3_,000 2,000 1900 48201 FOURTH OF JULY FIREWORKS 0 0 3,600 3 960 -- -- - - - - - -- -1- _.: r - -- - 1so1 4820 FOURTH OF JULY FIREWORKS 17,735 10,000 1 0 0 1602 5210SUPPLIES - - - - 1,981 - - 5,300 l 6,500 -- 6,500 1903 -- - 52201 UNIFORMS 4,545 6,000 2,000 2 000 1904 524 TOOLS _ - -- 0 - 3,000 _ _ _ _ , 0� . _ 0 1905 5410I MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI I 1,772 2,000 fi 2,600 1,600 - - - - - - - - 1606 5550 SCHOOL PROGRAMS 23,0602 1 29,0000 23,900 i 14,300 1907 5610 1 BASEBALL 0 - 1s0e 5620 SOFTBALL p+ 0 - _ 0 - 0 F - - - - 0 1909 5621 ADULT SOFTBALL LEAGUES _ _ 0 _ 0 0 0; 1910 5630 FOOTBALL 16,398 fi 5,000_ 7,672 1 7,672 - - -- - - - - - - 1911 5631 CHEERLEADERS °' - -- - - 1,000 1912 ` � _ I 775 ( 0i 1 00� ----,--------563-5--DANCE/MODELING - - - - - 1913 5640 BASKETBALL p 0 r -- 0 1914 5641 (ADULT BASKETBALL LEAGUE 0 0 0 i U -- _ 1616 5650 SOCCER - 0 i 0 -- -- -- . .- _ 0 1916 5660 SPECIAL YOUTH PROGRAMS 7 1 28,37 _ _ � , 24,000 a _ _ 23,800 16,000 1917 5670 SUMMER CAMP 1,488 5,000 10,000 I 1918 5680 9,000 SENIOR CITIZENS PROGRAM 1 15,899 15,000 16,800 16,800 1919 _ I - . 1920 TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES $356,987 $352 71 1 - - - - - - - - - - - .. _$325,867 i - - $275,432 T_ �.__ . _ 1921 _ _ . 1922 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE _ _ _ -_ __. _ _ _ $1,258,278_ $1,330_,919 _ $1,249,936 � - $1,202,175 1923 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 47 PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.373 MILLS -1 MILL INCREASE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B p p 1924 FUND GENERAL 01 1925 1926 DEPARTMENT DIVISION RECREATION — PARKS & RECREATION ; 20� XX - __ _ _ — — - 1927 FUNCTION_ _ RECREATION ACTIVITIES_ 1928. 1929 - - -- - - -- - _ � ACTUAL - � -- D F ADOPTED - -- DEPARTMENT'S -_ CiITY MANAGER'S _ACCT IA_CCOUNT CLASS_ IFICATION_ EXPENDITURES BUDGET_ REQUESTS ' R NS 1x31 — NO ' _ 2001-2002 1 2002-2003 2003-2004 _ECOMMENDATIO 2003 -2004 - 1932 1933 1934 _ — 6420 6430 CAPITAL OUTLAY OFFICE EQUIPMENT -- OPERATING EQUIPMENT $300 8,981 $0 0 $0 15,450 $0. 15,450 1935 1938 - - 1s37 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY $9,281+ $0 $15,450 - - - - $15,450 1938 1s3s - _ TOTAL EXPENDITURES $1,267,559 $1,217,625 $1,330,919 $1,265,386 1940 1941 -----!.BUDGETED POSITIONS _ 23 26 --2 - — — Y3 _ - 1942. :' 1943 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A I B, p p 1944 I FUND GENERAL I 1_ 01 1945 DEPARTMENT RECREATION - 20rt - 1 1946 DIVISION PARKS & RECREATION 00 1947 FUNCTION RECREATION ACTIVITIES 672[___ 72 1948 1949 1950 _ - ACCT _ iACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION ACTUAL EXPENDITURES ADOPTED BUDGET + DEPARTMENT'S REQUESTS MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATIONS 1951 NO - - _ t 2001 -2002 - - -- 2002 -2003 - 2003 -2004 2003 -2004 1952 1953 1210 rSALARIES &_FRINGE BENEFITS 1954 1310 SALARIES & WAGES - REGULA SALARIES & WAGES - PART TI $568,326 $602,077 30,000 $776,335 p $739,458 1955 1956 1410 OVERTIME _ - _0 17,4651 - 5,000 _ L 2,000 22,800 0 1958 - TOTAL SALARIES &WAGES $585 791 ._ $637,077 t $778,335 t - --$762,258_ 1959 1960 2110 - _ A. 44,841 ! 48,736 1 59,543 58,313 1961 2310, GROUP HEALTH' INSURANCE 54,531 i 76,191 86,491 - 106,172 1962 1963 CTOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE - - $685,163 - $762,004 $924,069 $926,743 1964 1969 SERVICES &SUPPLIES j _ - _ _ - - 1966 3100 - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TENNIS _ 0 _ r $0 $0 f $0 1967 3130 PRO i_ 21,000 17,735 0 0 1968 _ 3450 ]CONTRACTUAL SERVICES T 43,662 1 33,000 ! 51,480 34,320 1969 4070iTRAVEL & CONFERENCE 2,1241 1,0001 1,000 1,000 1970 4350 ELECTRICITY (CITY PARKS) 7 34,781 + 45,000 43,728 _ 43,728 1971 1972 4420+ 4455 OUTSIDE; SERVICE RENTAL LEASE PURCHASE TRUCKS 4,120 0 4_,000 0 4,000 12,000 _ 4,000 5,500 1973 4620�MAINT 4630 & REP -PARK FACILITIE MAINT $ REP COM_M EQUIP 37,108 -1,230 1 45,000 800 38,555 1,180 32,000 0 1974 1975 4690�MAINT & REP.-TENNIS FACILIT 2,044 3,000 f 2,000 2,000 1976 48201 FOURTH OF JULY FIREWORKS 17,735 10,000 0 0 1977 5210 -- -- - SUPPLIES 1,863 - 2,000 - -- 2,000 -- 2,000 1978 - 5220 UNIFORMS - - 2,545 _ 4 000 2 ,0 000 _ _. 2,000 1s7s 5410 MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSC_RIPTI 1,772 - 2,000 _ _ 2.600 - 1, 1,600 1980 _ 5550 SCHOOL PROGRAMS _ 23 062 ' -- 29,000 - - - -' 23900 1981 5610 BASEBALL 0 0� 0 I- 0 1982 1983 56201 _ 5621 5630 SOFTBALL fiA_DULT SOFTBALL LEAGUES FOOTBALL 0 0� 16,398 0 0 5,000 0 - -- 0 0 0 - - 1984 _ - - 7,672 7,672 ` 1949 _ 56351 !CHEERLEADERS _ -, _- DANCE /MODELING 780 _ 75 0 ....... 1,000 0 1 1,000 1986 _ 0 1987 -- 5640 +1 BASKETBALL -- - p _; 0 1988 _5641JADULT BASKETBALL LEAGUE - _ 0 0 0 1989 1990 5650 1 - 5660 [SUMMER - - SOCCER (CAMP - - -0 28,377 - - 0 24,000 -" - 0 23,800 - 0 16,000 1991 __ 5670 SPECIAL RECREATION P_ I 1,488 5;000 10,000 9,000 1992 1993 5680 SENIOR CITIZENS PROGRAM - 15,899 15,000 1 -. 16,800 1 - 16,800 lssa 1995 -f TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES _ - $245,535 I�I $243,715 + $192,920 _ 19 ; _ _ TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE -_ _ __ _ _ __ - - __ 1 26 $1,007,539 1 _ $1,167,784 - $1,119,663 1ss8 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER - - 49 PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.373 MILLS -1 MILL INCREASE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C p I J 1999 FUND GENERAL 01 2000 DEPARTMENT. RECREATION 20 2oo1 DIVISION_ PARKS & RECREATION 00 2oo2 FUNCTION RECREATION ACTIVITIES - -- - -- 572 2003 - -- - -- CITY 2004 2005 ACCT ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION _ ACTUAL EXPENDITURES -j ADOPTED BUDGET DEPARTMENT'S REQUESTS MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATIONS zoos zom NO -- - - - 2001-2002 - - 2002-2003 - 2003-2004 2003 -2004 2008 642_0 CAPITAL OUTLAY _ OFFICE_ EQUIPMENT _ $300 _ $0 $0 , i - - $0 2009 2010 2011 6430 OPERATING EQUIPMENT — 0 0 0 + _ _ 0` 2012 —TOTAL - �- - CAPITAL OUTLAY $300 $0 $01 $0 2013 2014 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $941,526 $1,007,539 I $1,167,7841 $1,119,663 2018 2018 2017 - jBUDGETED POSITIONS -- - - - 17� 20 -- -j - - - f 23 2018 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER' CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET s PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.373 MILLS -1 MILL INCREASE - wT,a -F ^fit; ,�,m- '�s'."u'^'�x'"2.Y', ,.�mas":.Y�'�- '.�,-iCa 'Y"51 ,'''r °' �i"3`R:';_k'- w',�"'- •n.3'ib fi '"�j"'�,_'Rs "�,- "� 9e �.". �"'r,,. _f. - "" J., zrT'.rn -r,'7 A 8 -C D I J 2019 RECREATION DEPARTMENT EN_ T _ 2020 - — BUDGET COMMENTS - 2021 2022 2023 ACCT. �ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION FIY 2003 -2004 PROPOSED -- 2024 NO. — - 2025 2o26 2000-672-1210 1SALARIES REGULAR $739,458 i --------- 1310�SALARIES PART TIME 22,800 202a 2000-572- -,SALARIES 203o 2000- 572 - 1410 - OVERTIME - -_ 0 - 2031 2032 _- 2000 - 572 -21101 r F.I C.A. 58,313 -- 2033 2o3a 2000 - 572- 2310GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 106,172 r 20351 - -- -1 - — — -- — --r- - - -. 2036 2000 - 572- 3130TENNIS — — PRO 0 2037 2o3s 2000-672-3460' - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - - -; - a 34,320 i - — -- - 2039 2o4o 2000-572-4070 _. ;TRAVEL & CONFERENCE _ _ I 1,000 _ 1 1 r 2041 C - -- - _ 2042120 ELECTRICITY_ 43,728 - 4 2043 2o44 2000 - 572 -4420 OUTSIDE SERVICE RENTAL 4,000 _ 2045 - I 1 - -- - -- - - 2046 2000-672-4465 PLEASE PURCHASE - TRUCKS 5,500 — - - -- 2o4e 2000-572-4620 AINT & REP PARK FACILITIEr 32,000 2046 2o5o 2000 - 572 -4630 MAINT & REP -COMM EQUIPME 0 2057 2os2 2053 2000 - 572 -4690 - - MAINT & REP TENNIS FACILIT -- -- - - 2,000 - - - -- 2054 2055 -- - 2000- 572 - 4820 FOURTH OF JULY FIRE WORK L 0 � - - -- - 2o56 2000-572-5210 SUPPLIES - _ 2,000 _ _- - 2057 2059 2059 - 2000-572-5220 -- — - -t- hUNIFORMS I `— -- -- -- -- 2,000 - --- � - - — - -- -- - -- -- - -- -- - - -1 - -- - — - - - -- -- - 2060 2061 !,PLEASE SEENEXT PAGE FOR MORE RECREATION DEPT BUDGET COMMENTS - 2062 — 2os3 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED: PAPER.. s PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.373 MILLS -1 MILL INCREASE - wT,a -F ^fit; ,�,m- '�s'."u'^'�x'"2.Y', ,.�mas":.Y�'�- '.�,-iCa 'Y"51 ,'''r °' �i"3`R:';_k'- w',�"'- •n.3'ib fi '"�j"'�,_'Rs "�,- "� 9e �.". �"'r,,. _f. - "" J., zrT'.rn -r,'7 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET 92 PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.373 MILLS -1 MILL INCREASE `P„' iT.' -�` ,''°5� 3.T' .'","k'�... 7'T�,-" ' - � `- iSi'°:.?"""� A B C D I J 2�4 2065 _ - -� - _ RECREATION DEPARTMENT - - BUDGET COMMENTS - CONTINUED] toss FN 2003-2004 - - - - - - 2067 zosa ACCT: (ACCOUNT DESCRIPTIONROPOSED - r 2069 _NO.��i - - -- — - - - - -- - 2071 2000 - 572 -5410 MEMBERSHIP & SUBSCRIPTIO - 2072 2073 2000-572-6550 SCHOOL PROGRAMS 14,300 - 2074 2o75 2000-672-6610 BASEBALL 0 2076 eon — _: 2000 -572 -5620 - _ SOFTBALL _ - - -- _ 0 - - - - -- - - - 2078 2079 2000-672-6621 (ADULT SOFTBALL LEAGUES 0 - 2090 - _A00-672 - - -- - - .. — - - -- -- - - - - - -- -- -- - - -- - - - - -- - 2081 -56301 FOOTBALL _ - 7,672 2093 2000- 572 -5631 CHEERLEADERS 1,000 2098 2085 2000-572-5635 DANCE /MODELING - - 2086 - 2087 2088 2000-572-5640 BASKETBALL �- - - 0 2089 - - 2000- 572 -5641 - -- - ADULT BASKETBALL LEAGUE ' 0 -- -7 - - -- - { - - 2090 2091 2092 2093 2000 - 572- 5650�SOCCER -- - - 2000 572 -5660 - - SUMMER CAMP -- 16,000 _ �- - - _ -- - - 20941 2095 2000-572-5670 - - SPECIAL RECREATION PROGR - - — -- -- 9,000 - - - -- - -- - - 2096 - 2os7 2000-672-5680 - - - 'SENIOR CITIZENS PROGRAMS - - _ 16,800 -- - 2098 2099 2000-572-6420 -- (OFFICE EQUIPMENT _ - 0 - - - 2100 21o1 2000 -572 -6430 - -- ;OPERATING EQUIPMENT - -- -_ __ � 0 - - - , _ - _ - 2102 21o3 2104 — _�_ �= TOTAL — - -- - $1,119,663 - - -- - - + 2105 THIS PAGE 1S PRINTED ON RECYCLED' PAPER I 92 PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.373 MILLS -1 MILL INCREASE `P„' iT.' -�` ,''°5� 3.T' .'","k'�... 7'T�,-" ' - � `- iSi'°:.?"""� m - _ CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A I B C 1 1) 2106 FUND (GENERAL_ 01 _ 2107 21o8 DE_PARTM_ENT DIVISION_ RECREATION MULTI- PURPOSE CENTER 201 20 _ _ 21os FUNCTION GENERAL GOVT. SERV1 5191 2110 CITY 2111 ACTUAL j ADOPTED _ DEPARTMENT'S _ MANAGER'S 2112 ACCT !ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION k EXPENDITURES BUDGET REQUESTS RECOMMENDATIONS 2113 NO_ _ _ 2001-2002 2002 -2003 — 2003-2004 2003-2004 2114 — - 1- -- - - - -� -- 2115 _ SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS 2116 1210ISALARIES 1410 & WAGES REGULA OVERTIME _ 0 _ 0 0 $0 0 2117 2118 2119 — -- -- TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES $0 $0 2120 2121 2122 2110F.IC.A., 2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 0 1 0� 0 2123 21241 _ _ TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE _ $0 - - $01 _ Vol _ 2125 _ SERVICES & SUPPLIES 2126 2127 3450 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES $01 $0 - $3,600 $3,600 2128 4100 EQUIPMENTAL RENTAL ; f j 1,75_2 1,752 2129 2130 4120iTELEPHONE _ 43104 SERVICE UTILITIES ELECTRICITY' _ 0+ ------- F 0 5,700 48,000 5,700 48,000 2131 43204 -- - 4670 UTILITIES WATER - -- S— - ER — 1 MAINT &REP GRDS & STRUCT — 0 0 _ 0 0 5,000 10 5,000 } 21321 000 -- - -- 10,000 2133 4710 COPYMACHINE -- -- _ -- - —0� _ 0 3 600 __ 3,960 2134 5210�SUPPLIES _ 0l 0 _. _ 4,500 4,500 2135 2136 5260'CHEMICALS _ 5245 /SUPPLIES TOOLS 0, 0, 0 0 6,000 0 1 0 f - - 0 . 2137 21381 2139 TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES $0 - — - — $0 - $88,152 _ _.. $82,512 2140 2141 _ TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE - -- — $0 - -- $0� _ $88,152 $821512 2142 2143 _ 6430 -- CAPITAL OUTLAY OPERATING EQUIPMENT 0 $0 - $15,450 - $15,450 z144 - - - � - - - -- - -_ f- -" - -- - -- __ _ — $0 - $0 _ $15,450 $15,450 21as _ — TOTAL PITAL CA OUTLAY 2146 2147 _ TOTAL EXPENDITURES $-0 $0 $103,602 $97,962 2148 _ _ 2149 2150 BUDGETED POSITIONS ' 0 0 — — - 0 - - THIS PAGE IS PRINTED 2151 ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET 54 PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.373 MILLS -1 MILL INCREASE A B C I D I J 2152 _ RECREATION DEPARTMENT 2153 _ BUDGET COMMENTS 2154 FlY 2003-2004 - - - -- - -- - 2165 2156 ACCT. A ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PROPOSED } I 2157 2158 2166 NO. 2020- 519 -1210 - SALARIES - REGULAR -- - - $0 - - - - 2160 — — _ 216112020-519-1410 2162 SALARIES OVERTIME 2163 2020 -519 -2110 F.I.C.A. 0 2164 2165 2020 - 519 -2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE — 0 _ _ - - 2166 2167 zlse 2020 - 519 -3450 - - � CONTRACTUAL SERVICES — -- — 3,600 -- — - 2166 2020- 519.4100- rt - EQUIPMENTAL RENTAL _- - - 1,752 ------ - 2170 +TELEPHONE - - 2171 2020 - 519 - 4120 - - SERVICE { - - - 5$700i — 2172 2173 2020- 519 -4310 - UTILITIES- ELECTRICITY 48,000 - - - -- - 2174 2175 _ 2020 - 519 -4320 - UTILITIES -WATER '- - r),000 - - - - �- 2176 - - -- - - - - 2177112020-519-4670 2178 12020-519-4710, MAINT & REP -GRDS & STRCTRlj 10,000 2179 2020 - 519 -4710 COPY MACHINE 3,960 2180 -- 2181 2182 2183 2020 - 519 -5210 - - 2020-519-6430 SUPPLIES - OPERA_ TING EQUIPMENT - 4,500 15,45_0 - — - 2184 t 2185 2186 TOTAL 1 97 962 2187 2188 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 54 PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.373 MILLS -1 MILL INCREASE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET i i i .55 PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.373 MILLS -1 MILL INCREASE A B` C D 2189 FUND GENERAL 01 2190 DEPARTMENT RECREATION _ 20� 2191 DIVISION ` LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 50 2192 FUNCTION OTHER GENERAL GOVT. SERV - - - L_-519, - - 2193 j CITY 2194 _ ACTUAL ADOPTED _ DEPARTMENT'S i I MANAGER'S ' 2195 ACCT ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION + EXPENDITURES _ _ BUDGET REQUESTS RECOMMENDATIONS 2196 NO 1 2001-2002 2002 -2003 2003-2004 E 2003 -2004 2197 - _ - - 2198 2199 _ _ -1210 - - SA_LA_RIES_& FRINGE BENEFITS SALARIES & WAGES - REGULAR- $166,714 $175,087L $01 $0 2200 1410 OVERTIME 19,062 51000 __ _ 0 _ 0 2201 - _ j 2202 — TOTAL SALARIES &WAGES $185,776 $180,087 $0 $0 2203 2204 2110 F.1 C A. 14,113 ' 13,777 0 0 2205 2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 19,6351 22,264 0 0 2207 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE $219,624 $21 0 2208 22o9 SERVICES & SUPPLIES - - + t zzlo 3450 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES $36,300 $35,000 i $0' $0 2211 4080 EDUCATION 726 j 1,000 0 0 2212 44551 LEASE PURCHASE TRUCKS 12,3091 7,952 0 p 2213 2214 2215 4625 4670 - _ _ 4680 LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS �- _ RDS & STRUCT MAINT & REP G _ _ MAINT & REP- OUTSIDE SERVI T 45,128 1 - 4 946 , —+ 01 45,000 10,000 _ 0 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 SUPPLIES _ _ 178 — 3,300 0 0 N22195210 5220 _ UNIFORMS _ _ — 2,124 1 2,000 1 0 _ _ 0 5245 - -- TOOLS _ _ L_ OT 3,000 0 -0 2220 2221 (TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES $101,651 1 $107, 5 - $0 - $0 2222 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE $321,175 $323,380 $01 $0 2223 2224 _ - - - - - - CAPITAL OUTLAY - - 2225 6430 OPERATING EQUIPMENT 8,981 0 $0 2226 2227 _ TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY $8,981 $0 $0 $p 2228 _ 2229 2230 EXPENDITURES -- - -- - -- $330,1_66 — -a _ _ $323,380 __ - $0 - - - -- - $p 2231 BUDGETED POSITIONS 6 6 01 p 2232 �- - 2233 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER i i i .55 PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.373 MILLS -1 MILL INCREASE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET i 56 PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.373 MILLS -1 MILL INCREASE A B C D I J 2234 FUND GENERAL __- 2235 DEPARTMENT INON-DEPARTMENTAL - EXPEN 21y 2236 DIVISION = NON- DEP_ARTME_NTAL EXPEN 00 2237 _ FUNCTION i_ OTHER GENERAL GOVT SERV 519 2238 _ _ CITY 2239 _ ACTUAL ADOPTED DEPARTMENT'S MANAGER'S 2240 ACCT_ 'ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURES BUDGET REQUESTS RECOMMENDATIONS 2241 2242 NO }SALARIES 2001- 2002 ; 2002 -2003 2003 -2004 2003 -2004 2243 _ & FRINGE BENEFITS 2244 _ 1210 SALARIES & WAGES - REGULA - $40,889 _ - 2245 - 2246 TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES $40,889 1 -r - $40,125 $0 - - - $p 2247 2zas i_ _2110 F.1 C.A. _ _ - $3,117 - $3,070 - 2243 2210 -- PENSION PLAN CONTRIBUTIO+ - 267,188 - - + 250,000 T _ 620,000 640,000 22501 2220 DEFERRED COMPENSATION C � 46,064 42,520 � 42,040 , 42,040 2251 2252 2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE _ - - - - _ - 3,00_6 _ 4,588 _ _ 0 0 - 1 - - -- 2253 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE - $360,264 $340,303 1 $662,040 $682,040 2254 2255 SERVICES & SUPPLIES F - 2256 _ 31601 PRE EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL $0 $0 $0 _ _ $0 2257 3210iAUDITOR'S FEE O I 0 r 55,000 1 55,000 2258 3450 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0 0 Or 0 2259 4070 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE _ - _ _ 0� - 0 - 0� _ p 2260 4080 !EMPLOYEE EDUCATION_ - 0 0 0 0 2261 4120 COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHO 58,817 69,000 78,000 78,000 2262 4425 }1 LEASE PURCHASE- POLICE 80 LEASE 0 0 - 25,_0_00 2.5,000 2263 44_301 PURCHASE PRINTER [ 0�l 0 - 0 i _ 0 226 4440 LEASE PURCHASE- TELEPHON 1 14,354L 15,000 _ 0 0 zz65 2266 4445 463011 LEASE PURCHASE AS 400 MAINTENANCE & REP -COMM E 0 10,900 0 3,500 0 11,500 p 11,500 2267 2268 4632 4633 MAINTENANCE & REP - INTERN MAINTNCE- COMPUTER NETW 0 0 _ _ 0 0 0 0 0 0' 2269 46351MAINT P. C EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 p 2270 4720' PRINTING & PHOTOCOPYING 0 - 0 0 7,500 2271 4850ADVERTISING - NON LEGAL - _ _ 0 1 0 0� 0 2272 J 5210 SUPPLIES _ _ AFTER PROGRAM 463 1,500 _ _ 500 1 . -_. _ 500 2273 2274 2273 5660 s590LONG 8310 SCHOOL RANGE PLANNING - SEED FUNDS - _ 0 - 0 ' 43 826 -- 0 - 0 0 _ 0 0 0 _ _ 0 _ 0' 0 2276 2277 9210 9230�C CONTRIBUTION TO INS. FUND NTRIBUTN TO S MARTIN TR i" 10,000 0 10_,000 0 25,000 0 20,000 0 - 71,807 76,400 0 65,000 30,227 50,000 22781 22791 92401CONTRIBUTION 9910�CONTRIBUTION TO CRA TRUS' SPECIAL EVE 2280 99151 - -- CONTRIBUTION RED SUNSET 20,000 18,000 __ _ 0 _ 0' 22811 99201 GENERAL CONTINGENCY i 51,348 63,573 100,000 100_ ,000 2282 9925 9930164TH RA FUCHS PRK GNT MATCHNG AVE PARK. LOAN REPAY o ' 0 p 2283 - 24,925 _ 0 01 0 2284 9936 COMP NETWORK LOAN REPA - - - - 0 - 0 - 0 _ - - p 22a5 9950 -- - -1 RESERV _ E FOR REENCUMBRA� 15,075 10,00 5,000 - 6,000 22861 �-- I - - -- 2287 - TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES 1 $321,515 $266 $365,000 $382,727 2299 2289 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE - - - -- 1 $681,779 - $607,276 - - $1,027,040 - - - - ' j $1,064,767 ' 2290 2291 ON RECYCLED PAPER THIS PAGE IS PRINTED i 56 PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.373 MILLS -1 MILL INCREASE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A I B C D I J 2292 FUND iGENERAL 01j 2293 2294 DEPARTMENT DIVISION ` j_NON 1, NON - DEPARTMENTAL EXPEN DEPARTMENTAL EXPEND 21 001 — 2295 zzss FUNCTION -- 10 HER GENERAL GOVT SERV - - — — — 5191 - CITY 2297 2298 ACCT ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION e EXPENDITURES ADOPTED BUDGET DEPARTMENT'S REQUESTS _ MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATIONS 2299 NO 2001-2002l 2002 -2003 2003 2003 2300 -2004 -2004 2301 23o2 _ 6420 CAPITAL OUTLAY OFFICE EQUIPMENT _ $1,914 _$0 2303 _ 6430 OPERATING EQUIPMENT j 799 _ 0� 0 * 0 2304 6435 - - ACQUISTN OF PARKNG -METE -- I o! - __ -- 0 - - 0 2305 2306 �— — - -- I- $2,713 _ $0 - _$0 $0 2307 2308 2309 -- ''TOTAL EXPENDITURES < $684,492 $607,276 F ___41-2-027,040; _ — $1,064,767` 2310 - -- BUDGETED POSITIONS _ 1.0 1.0 2311 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 2312 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED REVENUES A B r E F K L 1 GENERAL FUND - 001 2 OBJECT CODE_ -0000 3 REVENUE CODE - 03 4 ADOPTED DEPARTMENT'S CITY MANAGER'S 5 ACTUAL , ' I 6 ACCT. ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION REVENUES REVENUES REQUESTS RECOMMENDATIONS 7 NO. 2001 -2002 2002 -2003 - 2003 - 2004 2003 -2004 _ $6,329,116_ 9 11.10 -00 ' AD VALOREM TAXES _ - $4,520,843 _$4,742,490 $5,187,779 10 11.20 -00 DELINQUENT> TAXES ! 86,518 45,000 45,000 45,000 11.21 -00 ; PENALTIES & INTEREST 3,051 50,000 25,000 25,000 _12 13 _ TOTAL AD VALOREM TAXES $4,610,412 ± _ $4,837,490 $5,257,779 $6,399,116 - - - - - - 15 1FRANCHISE -- - TAXES _ 16 13.10 -00 ELECTRICITY $714,063 _ $676,0001 _ $680,000 $680,000 17 13.20 -00 TELEPHONE r 0 _ 0 0 0 18 13.40 -00 _ GAS 1F 16,528 18,000 18,000 1.8,000 19 13.50 -00 _ CABLE T V FRANCHISE T - 0� 0 - 0 0_ - 20 - 21 _ TOTAL FRANCHISE TAXES - $730,591 - - $693,000 _ $698,000 - $698,000. 22 23 -- - �- - - -- - UTILITY TAX ' - - 24 _ 14.10 -00 +ELECTRICITY $886,6441 $875,000 $870,000 $870,000 25 14.20 -00 TELEPHONE 0 j 0 0 0 26 14.30-00 WATER 100,604 110,000 95,000 95,000 27 14.40 -00 GAS 30,141, 29,000 _ 27,500 27,500 28 29 - iTOTAL UTILITY TAXES - $1,017,390 - = $1 014,000] -- $992,500 - - $992,500 31 _ COMMUNICATION SERVICES TAX 32 15.00 -00 }UNIFIED COMM SERVICES TAX $762,339 _ $675,0001 $675,000 - $675,000 33 34 _ DOTAL COMMUNICATION TAX-- �- - -- $762,339 $675,000 $675,000 - $675,000 35 LICENSES & PERMITS -� � 36 37 21 10 -00 OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE F _- , - - - $313,581 $325,000 $325,000 $325,000' 38 39 21.20 -00 21.30 -00 OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE -NEW LOBBYIST REGISTRATION FEE ,- 38,501 2,750 45,000 5,000 40,000 1,500 40,000 1,500' 40 22.10 -00 BUILDING PERMITS _ 329,520 3_75,000 400,000 620,000 41 29_10 00 PENALTIES ON OCC LICENSE_ 10,075 13,000 _ 10_,000 10,000 42 29 20 -00 TOWING LICENSING FEE_ 01 0 0 0 43 44 TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS $694,429 1 $763,000 j $776,500 $996,500 45 - -- -t - - I - - - - - 46 _ STATE SHARED TAXES I - 47 35.10-12 REVENUE SHARING $301,982 $292,98211 $299,000 $299,000 48 3510-15 ! LEVERAGE LICENSE 15,016 15,000 12,500 12,500 49 3510 -18 112 CENT SALES TAX 625,041 625,000 620,000 6201000 5o 3_5.49 -20 _1 LOCAL OPTION GAS TAX 198,522 200,000 j 196,000 196,000 $1,132,982 $1,127,500 $1,127,500 52 LTOTAL STATE SHARED TAXES 41,140,5611 53 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED REVENUES PROPOSED 'BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.873 MILLS -1.5 MILLS INCREASE A B E F K L 54 GENERAL FUND - 01 55 OBJECT CODE __0000- 0000 56 REVENUE CODE - 03 57 - - - - -i - - _ - CITY 58 ACTUAL ADO_PTE_D_ DEPARTMENT'S MANAGER'S 59 ACCT. ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION_ REVENUES I RE_VEN_UE_S _REQUESTS RECOMMENDATIONS 60 NO. _ _ - 2001 -2002 _ 2002 -2003 2003-2004 2003-2004 81 _ 62 COUNTY REVENUE _ r 63 38.20-00 SHARE OF CTY OCC. LICENSE - $22,014 T $16,500 ; $17,000 $17,000 64 - 65 TOTAL_COUNTY REVENUE - - $22,014 - $16,500 - $17,000 - $17,000 66 = - -- - 67 GENERAL CHARGES _ 68 41.20 -00 _ ZONING HEARING FEES + - $16,800 $9,000 $12,000 $12,000 69 41.30 -00 4ENV REV &PRESV BR'FEE i_ 14,195 1.2,000 12,000 12,000 7o 41.40 -00 (MICROFILM SALES Y_ 3,355 T' 3,500 - 4,000 4,000 71 41.90 -10 , B & Z REINSPECTION FEES - 5,660 9,000 4,000 4_,000 72 41.90 -20 QUALIF FEES - ELECTIONS t _ 1,040 0 0 0 73 41.90-30 CERT. OF USE /OCCUPANCY t_ 19,9751---- 9,975 1 _ 45,000 20 ;000 20,000 74 CO DE ENFORCEMENT FINES _ 158,877 80,000 609000 60,000 76 TOTAL GENERAL CHARGES $219,903 $158,500 t _ $112,000 $112,000' 77 - _ -- - -- -- - - - - 76 _ PUBLIC SAFETY - - - -- 79 42.10 -10 POLICE SERVICES _ _ 57,6811 $50,000 l- $45,000 $45,000 81 _ _ TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY _ $57,681 $50,000 $45,000 $45,000 82 M-43.41-00 P HYSICAL CHARGES ;SOLID WASTE CHARGES 43.41 -50 CNTY SOLID WASTE SURCHARGE - 59000 0� - _ 0 0 86 43.42-00 RULERS PERMIT FEES 172,811 170,000 250,000 250,000 87 _ 88 - TOTAL PHYSICAL CHARGES j $239,093 $185,000 $255,000 $255,000 - - - - - - -- - -- - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - _i - -- - - - -' - 90 _ J PARKING SYSTEM 91 44.61-00 PERMITS $53,200 - - - - -- - - - - -- ---------- - - - - -- -_ _--- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- $45,000..- .- - - - - =- .$45,000 $45,000 92 44 52 -00 METER FRANCHISE FEES _ _ 701,743 1,134,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 93 44.52 -10 VALET PARKING 15,695 14,000 14,000 14,000 94 44_.53-00 VIOLATIONS COLLECTIONS _ 468,061 _ 5.00,000 500,000 500,000 95 44.54 -00 PARKING METER CASH KEY 10,412 10,000 f - 15,000 - 15,000 96 97 _ GROSS PARKING REVENUE $1,249,111 $1,703,000 $1,674,000 $1,674,000 &9,0,90 less parking contract fee _ C (199,820) (199,820) (210,000) �ET PARKING REVENUE $1,249 ;111 $1,503,180 $1,474,180 $1,464,000 ..101 _ 102 - RECREATION FEES - - - - -- - - - - - - 1o3 47.26-01 TENNIS MEMBERSHIPS RES. $675 -- - - - $700 j, -- -- - $700 - - $700 104 47.26 10 TENNIS MEMBERSHIP- NON -RES. 7,562 9,000 i 7,600 7,500 105 47.26 -20 TENNIS COURT FEES 15,087 16,000 141000 -- 14,000 - 106 47.26-30 RECREATION FEES _ 29,815 25,000 50,000 50,000 107 47.26-60 CONCESSION STANDS 01 0 0 0 108 I 109 TOTAL RECREATION. FEES � $53,139 f $50,700 �� $72,200 $72,200 110 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER PROPOSED 'BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.873 MILLS -1.5 MILLS INCREASE A B E F K L 54 GENERAL FUND - 01 55 OBJECT CODE __0000- 0000 56 REVENUE CODE - 03 57 - - - - -i - - _ - CITY 58 ACTUAL ADO_PTE_D_ DEPARTMENT'S MANAGER'S 59 ACCT. ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION_ REVENUES I RE_VEN_UE_S _REQUESTS RECOMMENDATIONS 60 NO. _ _ - 2001 -2002 _ 2002 -2003 2003-2004 2003-2004 81 _ 62 COUNTY REVENUE _ r 63 38.20-00 SHARE OF CTY OCC. LICENSE - $22,014 T $16,500 ; $17,000 $17,000 64 - 65 TOTAL_COUNTY REVENUE - - $22,014 - $16,500 - $17,000 - $17,000 66 = - -- - 67 GENERAL CHARGES _ 68 41.20 -00 _ ZONING HEARING FEES + - $16,800 $9,000 $12,000 $12,000 69 41.30 -00 4ENV REV &PRESV BR'FEE i_ 14,195 1.2,000 12,000 12,000 7o 41.40 -00 (MICROFILM SALES Y_ 3,355 T' 3,500 - 4,000 4,000 71 41.90 -10 , B & Z REINSPECTION FEES - 5,660 9,000 4,000 4_,000 72 41.90 -20 QUALIF FEES - ELECTIONS t _ 1,040 0 0 0 73 41.90-30 CERT. OF USE /OCCUPANCY t_ 19,9751---- 9,975 1 _ 45,000 20 ;000 20,000 74 CO DE ENFORCEMENT FINES _ 158,877 80,000 609000 60,000 76 TOTAL GENERAL CHARGES $219,903 $158,500 t _ $112,000 $112,000' 77 - _ -- - -- -- - - - - 76 _ PUBLIC SAFETY - - - -- 79 42.10 -10 POLICE SERVICES _ _ 57,6811 $50,000 l- $45,000 $45,000 81 _ _ TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY _ $57,681 $50,000 $45,000 $45,000 82 M-43.41-00 P HYSICAL CHARGES ;SOLID WASTE CHARGES 43.41 -50 CNTY SOLID WASTE SURCHARGE - 59000 0� - _ 0 0 86 43.42-00 RULERS PERMIT FEES 172,811 170,000 250,000 250,000 87 _ 88 - TOTAL PHYSICAL CHARGES j $239,093 $185,000 $255,000 $255,000 - - - - - - -- - -- - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - _i - -- - - - -' - 90 _ J PARKING SYSTEM 91 44.61-00 PERMITS $53,200 - - - - -- - - - - -- ---------- - - - - -- -_ _--- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- $45,000..- .- - - - - =- .$45,000 $45,000 92 44 52 -00 METER FRANCHISE FEES _ _ 701,743 1,134,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 93 44.52 -10 VALET PARKING 15,695 14,000 14,000 14,000 94 44_.53-00 VIOLATIONS COLLECTIONS _ 468,061 _ 5.00,000 500,000 500,000 95 44.54 -00 PARKING METER CASH KEY 10,412 10,000 f - 15,000 - 15,000 96 97 _ GROSS PARKING REVENUE $1,249,111 $1,703,000 $1,674,000 $1,674,000 &9,0,90 less parking contract fee _ C (199,820) (199,820) (210,000) �ET PARKING REVENUE $1,249 ;111 $1,503,180 $1,474,180 $1,464,000 ..101 _ 102 - RECREATION FEES - - - - -- - - - - - - 1o3 47.26-01 TENNIS MEMBERSHIPS RES. $675 -- - - - $700 j, -- -- - $700 - - $700 104 47.26 10 TENNIS MEMBERSHIP- NON -RES. 7,562 9,000 i 7,600 7,500 105 47.26 -20 TENNIS COURT FEES 15,087 16,000 141000 -- 14,000 - 106 47.26-30 RECREATION FEES _ 29,815 25,000 50,000 50,000 107 47.26-60 CONCESSION STANDS 01 0 0 0 108 I 109 TOTAL RECREATION. FEES � $53,139 f $50,700 �� $72,200 $72,200 110 THIS PAGE IS CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED REVENUES PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.873 MILLS -1.5 MILLS INCREASE A I B E F K L 111 GENERAL FUND - 01 112 OBJECT CODE -0000 113 REVENUE CODE - 03 - - -- -- - -- - - - -- 114 115 ACTUAL ADOPTED DEPARTMENT'S MANAGER'S 116 ACCT. ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION `. _ REVENUES_ REVENUES REQUESTS RECOMMENDATIONS 117 NO. +- 2001 -2002 _ 2002 -2003 20_03 -2004 2003-2004.__ 118 _ _ - - - - -- 11s - FINES & FORFEITURES -- - 120 51.12 -00 METRO COURT FINES _ _ $200,420 $225,OOR - $200,000 $200,000 121 54.10 -00 BURGLAR ALARM FINES ®STR 37,805 145,000 40,000 401000 122 54.10 -50 ALARM REGISTRATION FEES_ _ _ 0 - 0� _ 609000 _ 60,000 123 124 TOTAL FINES '& FORFEITURES - _ $238,225 $370,000 l $300,000 _ $300,000 125 4 126 RENTS_ INTEREST 127 61.20 -00 _ INTEREST INCOME - - $110,243 $150,000 $45,000 $45,000 128 - - - -- - - - -- 62.20 -00 RENT- FASCELL PARK - -- 10,6171 - - - - - 25,000 - -- - 12,000 -- - - -- 12,000 129 62 21 -00 INSPECTION_ STATION _y 249000 24,000 24,000 24,000 130 131 62 30-0_0 BUS BENCH ADS 62.50-00 RENT-C.A.A. _ - - 7,745_ _ 22,0_00 91000 2_2,000 _ 8,500 22,000 8,500 22,000 132 62.75-00: RENT- SOUTH :MIAMI FIELD 15,915 16,000 16,000 16,000 133 62.90-00 R ENT S MIA -INT'L BASEBALL ACAD i - - - 5,842 3,000 - 7,500 - - 7,500 134 �- -- - 1- � $135,000 $135,000 135 TOTAL RENTS & INTEREST $196,262 $249,000 ! 136 � 137 _ _ _' _ SALES & REIM_BURSEM_ENT - - -- - 138 66 90 -00 HOSPITAL LANDSCAPE - -- $30,0001 - - ._$30,000{_ :$30,000 $30,000.. 139 14069.35-00 -- - -,- 69.30-00 ;'REFUND - - - - -- - -- - -- PRIOR YR'S EXP. PRIOR YEAR'S REVENUE - 110,788 5,711 -- 0 0 �- _ ; - 0 0 - - -- 0 141 69.46-00 - PROCEEDS OF HOSPITAL FINANCE 0 150,000 ` _ 0 l _0 0 142 69.56---00--* 9 56 -00 REIMB - WORKERS'COMP. _ - -L 14,820 _ 0 _ 0 0 143 69.52 -00 REIM_BS_MNT- POLICE LABOR 13,756' 0 0 0 144 69.53 -00 R_EIMBSMNT- BUILDING LABOR Oj 0 0 0 1451 69.64-00 REIMBS_MNT-PUB WORKS LABOR 1 14,945 04 0 0 146 69.60 -00 'jREIMBSMNT -PARKS LABOR 0� 0_i_ 0 0 147 69.61 -00_ REIMBSMNT_- FINANCE LABOR ; of 0 0 0 148 69.92 -01 MISCELLANEOUS - OTHERS 16,913' 75,000 25,000 25,000 149 69.92 -20 : - - GRANT ADMINISTRATN REIMB (SUNSET - 131,628 - 75,000 - 60,000 - - 60,006 15o 151 69.92 -25 81.15 -00 '1TRSFR DR MTCE -FDOT REIMB FROM WATER & SEWER FN� 11,074 200,000 11,000 250,000 11;000 250,000 11,000 250,000 152 81.17 -00 `JRSFR FROM CRA TRUST FUND 1200000 150,000 1200000 120,000 153 81.18 -00 TRSFR FROM ESCROW ACCTS + 01 + - ___ 0 0 0 154 82.30-00 CONTRIBTWSHOPS AT SUNSET 0 0 0 -- - - 0 155 - NEW REVENUE SOURCES -- - 0� - - -0 0 - - - 0- - 156 - - $658,213 -- - - $741,000 - { $496,000 - $496,000 1571 - -- - TOTAL SALES & REIMB. 158 - - - - 159 -i- - - - 160 $12,433,659 $13,784,816 161 _ TOTAL GEN. FD REVENUES { $11,889,361 $12,439,352 162 163 CASH CARRYOVER t 1,488,762 1 1,260,381 800,000 - (800,000) 800,000 (953,048) 1sa _ _ less CONTINGENCY CASH RESERV (1,225,162) 1 L_ (1,225,162) 165 - -- 16LtS iTOTALAVAILABLEFUNDS $12,152,961 12,474,571 412,4_ - -__ $12,433,659 - - - - - °_ $13,631,768 16- 16 PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER -- PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.873 MILLS -1.5 MILLS INCREASE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B, C D J CITY 2 aAD VALOREM TAXES ACTUAL - ADOPTED DEPARTMENT'S MANAGER'S I 3 _ _ EXPENDITURES BUDGET REQUESTS RECOMMENDATIONS a _ 2001 -2002 i 2002 -2003 2003 2004 _ 2003 -2004 5 - iM!LLAGE RATE____________ 6.373 6.373 7.873 ' 6.373; 1 - - -- - - - - 8 s �VALUE_OF_ONE MILL (BASED I 814,900 833,501 912,000 910,144 10 REAL & PERSONAL PROPERTIES) 12 LESS VALUE OF ONE MILL FO - - - - -- (60,835)1 (50,132)f (55,132) (63,932) 13 LCRA INCREASE/DECREASE IN TAXABLE ASSESSMENT 14 15 VALUE OF ONE MILL (AFTER DEDUCTING f 1 16 A50% OF CR_A INCREASED ASSE 754,065 783,369 856,868 846,212 _ 95% OF 1 MILL ALLOW FO 716,362 744,201 814,025 i 803,901 1a (TO 19 20 DELETIONS &DELINQUENCIES) - _ 21 AD VALOREM TAXES (BASED 4,565,373 4,742,790 5,187,779 6,329,116 22 95% OF 1 MILL)___ -:: - - 23 ;LESS SENIOR CITIZENS DISCO 01 o! _ _0 0 24 -- 25 NET PROPERTY TAX COLLECT; 4,565,373 1 4,742,790 f 5,187,7791 6,329,116 _ za _ _ _ ACTUAL ADOPTED _I DEPARTMENT'S MA AIGER'S - - - zs ACCT ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURES BUDGET REQUESTS RECOMMENDATIONS ' 30 NO _ - 2001-2002____ 2002 -2003 i 2003 -2004 i 2003-2004 31 j - - - - 32 1100 LEGISLATURE -CITY COMMISSI $108,100 - $114,054 $131,091 $36,923 33 1200 !CITY CLERK 141,920 ; 120,505 1 148,119 125,046 34 1310 !CITY MANAGER 21_4,202 280,874 ' 296,521 355,913 35 1315 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAI� 131,3361 141-0001 52,000 52,000 3s 1320 i OFFICE SERVICES _ -- _ .-- - --- 173,999 ! 183,495 ! --- , - -- -- ___ 226,529 216,350 3� 1330 HUMAN RESOURCES 125,344 193,216 ! 143,898 166,975 3s 1340 - MANAGEMENT INFORMATION _ - _ INFORMATION 1410 FINANCE DEPARTMENT 142,245 155,352 304,498 223,867 _ _ 340,604 364,288 392,385 3s 389,302 40 1420 NON- DEPARTMENT INSURANC1 ? 489,632 I 505,500 736,691 756,191 41 1500 1 CITY ATTORNEY 229,491 4 226,625 I 382,250 382,250 az 1610_ !BUILDING DIVISION 278,532 305,001 1 342,158 j 329,037 43 1620 PLANNING DIVISION _ 384,157 358,400 h 409,422 437,361 as - 1640 1 CODE ENFORCEMENT 197,873 J 210,024 222,346 222,350 45 - PUBLIC WORKS - _L 2,601,656 2,615,124 3,755,228 - 3,009,240 as 1710 ! -BLDG MAINT 357,115 437,672 623,734 351,527 47 7720 -SOLID WASTE 1,143,718 1,064,972 1,266,551 1,244,083 ae 1730- - STREET MAINT. { 138,613 156,849 1 695,331 464,822 as 1750 LANDSCAPE MAINT - -- - - - -- 0 0 - 0 0 - - -- -- 50 1760 EQUIPMENT MAINT r 514,209_ 552,945 11 689,016 4 566,657 51 1770 -OFFC OF DIRECTOR 179,545 192,281 ! 201,471 196,050 52 1790 i ENGRNG,CONSTRCTN &STOR 1 268,456 210,404 279,126, 186,101 53 1910 f POLICE LAW ENFORCEMENT - 4,733,581 ; 4,762,919 5,951,1$2 4,630,059 - 5a 2000 (RECREATION 1,267,5591 - 1,330,9191 1,265,3861 1,220,630 55 2100 NON DEPARTMENTAL EXPEN -- - 684,492 607,276 1,027,040 1,078,274 _ _ 5s 57 [TOTAL EXPENDITURES _ _ - - I 1- $12,244,723 $12,474,571 $15,786,726 $13,631,768 _ _ 1 58 5s }TOTAL PERSONNEL 168.001 163.50; 169.00 j 153.00 s0 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER i PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.873 MILLS -15 MILLS INCREASE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C D 61 62 FUND !GENERAL DEPARTMENT 1 - LEGISLATIVE 11 63 64 DIVISION FUNCTION - - - CITY COMMISSION 00 LEGISLATIVE 511 -- - �-- - - -'- - - CITY ss ACTUAL ADOPTED 66 67 68 ACCT _ NO ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURES 2001 -2002 BUDGET 2002 -2003 DEPARTMENT'S REQUESTS --..----..RECOMMENDATIONS.. 2003 -2004 MANAGER'S. 2003 -2004 69 SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS - 7o 71 _ 1110 1210 SALARIES &WAGES - EXECUTE 15,000 SALARIES & WAGES - REGULAI 28,089 $15,000 30,034 $15,000 31,083 $15,000 0 72 - 74 -- - TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES $43,089 $45,034 _ $46,083 ^_- $15,000 75 _ 76 2110 I - 1,148 77 2210 PENSION PLAN- EX r 0 0 i 0�_ 0 78 2310 _COMMISSI GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 3,697 fi 4,480 - 4,483 0 79 80 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE $5_0,077 1 $52,959 $54,091 1 $16,148 82 S ERVICES & SUPPLIES 83 83 84 _ 3210'AUDITOR'S 4010tMAYOR'S FEE EXPENSE 35,000 1,833 $39,000 2,000 $65,000 1 2,000 2,000 85 4020I.COMMISSIONER'S EXPENSE -O+ 11467 1,500+ 1,500 _ 1,500 4030 40401 LCOMMISSIONER'S EXPENSE F COMMISSIONER'S EXPENSE T 1,360 1,130 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,600 1,500 1,500 N86 4050rCOMMISSIONER'S EXPENSE T 1_ 1,467 1,500 1,500 ' 1,500 4060 4120 MAYOR'S AUTO ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHO 500 4,461 500 5500 5,500 5,500 _ 4_830 KEYS & FLOWERS _ 3,136 2,095 f 2,000 1,500 92 93 94 4840 52101SUPPLIE$ - 5410 TV BROADCSTNG- COMMISSN MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI 0 2,212 5,457 0 2,000 _ 4,000 0 2,000 4,000 0 2,000 3,275 96 97 TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES �- _ 023 $58, _ $61095 _ _ $77,000 _______$20,776 98 _ _ TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE $108,100 $114,054 $131,091 $36,923 99 1001 101 6420 CAPITAL OUTLAY_ EQUIPMENT OFFICE $0 -$0 $0 t $0 102 _6430 EQUIPMENT OPERATING 01 _ 0 -- 0 - 0 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY_ $0 $0 _$0 !$0 F06 __ TOTAL EXPENDITURES _$108,100 $114,054 $36,923 108 BUDGETED POSITIONS 6 6 6 5 109 110 THIS'PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C D 111 � _ __ (CITY 7BUDGET COMMISSION COMMENTS _ _ 112 113 _ RN 2003 -2004 PROPOSED _ - 114 115 ACCT NO. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 116 1100 -511 -1110 SALARIES - EXECUTIVES _ $15,000 MAYOR & CITY COMMISSION � -- - 117 118 119 120 1100-611- 1100-511-2110 SALARIES & WAGES - REGULA F.I.C.A. 01 1,148 121 -- 122 123 1100-511-2210 -- - PENSION PLAN - - - I -- - - 124 125 1100 -511 -2310 -- GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE - 07 - -- 126 127 128 1100 - 511 -4010 - 1100-511-4020 - I MAYOR'S EXPENSE - !COMMISSIONER ONE _ 2,000 _ 1,500 - - -- -- - - - - 130 1100- 511 -4030 COMMISSIONER FOUR —1,5po _ 131 132 _ � 1100-611-4040 T - -. - -- COMMISSIONER THREE 1,500 r .,- 134 135 136 1100-511-4050 _ 1100 - 511 -4060 COMMISSIONER TWO MAYOR'S AUTO ALLOWANCE 500 _ 137 138 1100- 511 -4120 COMMUNICATIONS - TELEPHO 5,500 139 140 1100- 511 -4830 - -- KEYS & FLOWERS - - -- -- -; 1,500 - - - - -- - - - -- - 141 - '- - - -- -t - � 142 143 1100- 511- 4840TV BROADCSTNG COMMISSN 0 -- I T -- ---- 14411100-611-5210 145 SUPPLIES 1- 2,000 - - - - - -- - � 146 147 1100- 511 -5410 MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI - 3,275 -- -- - _ - -- - - - -- - - -- - 148 149 TOTAL $36,923 l5o ITHIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER,- -__ = -_ CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A E C p I J 151 152 FUND DEPARTMENT - - GENERAL 01 CIT_Y_CLERK 12� - - -- - _ __ 153 DIVISION CITY CLERK 00� 154 FUNCTION ( EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT 512 ( -� _ CITY 155 _ - 156 _ _ _ ACTUAL f ADOPTED _ DEPARTMENT'S_ MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATIONS 157 158 ACCT _ NO ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURES 2001-2002 BUDGET 2002 -2003 REQUESTS 2003 -2004 2003 -2004 159 -- - -- - -' - SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS - -- - - -- 160 12101 ± } $94,562 161 162 163 _ -- -_ SALARIES & WAGES - REGU $89,853 ! TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES $89,863_t_ - - - -- } - $91,687 $91,687 $94,562 1 - $93,187 $93,187 164 165 2110 - - � F. I C A. $7,091 - $7,014 - -- - - - 166 - 2220 DEFERRED COMP_. CONTRIBU 3,000 - 4,000 4,000 _ 4,000 167 _ 2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE ! 7,153 8,404 i 8,373 9,780 168 169 iTOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE - - - $107,097 - $111,105 $114,169 - - $114,096 170 171 172 4060 SERVICES & SUPPLIES E_M_PLOYEE AUTO_ALLOW_ANC _ $50_0 $500 $500 $500 173 _ 4070 TRA_VEL_ &_ CONFERENCE _ _ 0 300-1---- - 0 0 174 _ 4080 4910 EDUCATION LEGAL AD - 135 19,79_8 400 0 I 400 1 2 000 3, _ 400 0 K175 176 4920, ELECTIONS _ 9,9901 1,000 4,000 4,000 - 177 4950 1 CODIFICATIONS _ _ _ 2,478E _ 4,000 5,000 - 5,000 178 1791 180 181 5210 5410 - - - - -- SUPPLIES MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPT( TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES -- - - - - -- - - -- -- 8541 _- 165 $33,920 800 - 400 $7,400 800 250 _ $33,950 800 250 $1.0,950 182 183 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE $141,017 !: $118,505 $148,119 $125,046 184 - 185 _ _ CAPITAL OUTLAY 186 1a7 6420 6510 E_Q_I MENT OFFICE RECORDS RETENTION 0 903t- 03 $0 - 2,000 $0 0 $0 0 1881 1891 i TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY - - $903 $2,000 $0 1901 191 - - 1 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $141,920 $120,505 L $148,119 1 $125,046 193 BUDGETED POSITIONS 2 2 2 - -- 2 194 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C D J 195 CITY CLERK 1ss 197 _ _ BUDGET COMMENTS FN 2003 -2004 1ss ACCT. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PROPOSED - -- - - - Zoo 201 202 NO. 1200- 512 -1210 SALARIES &WAGES - EXECUT $93,187 203 204 205 1200- 512 -2110 F.I.C.A. 7,129 - - 208 1200 -512- 22201DEFERRED COMP CONTRIBUT 4,000 207 208 1200 - 512- 2310'G UP HEALTH INSURANCE — 9,780 — 209 12.0.0- 512 AUTO ALLOWANCE -- _ - -4.060 -- - - - - -- - ' r2l 1200-512- 40U0 & CONFERENCE � tEDUCATION 0 400 1200- 512 -4080 215 z16 1200- 512 -4910 LEGAL AD 0 i - _ 217 ( I 219 1200- 512 -4920 - -�` LELECTIONS -- 4,000_1_ - - - - - - -- - _ - 219 220 1200 - 512 -49501 CODIFICATIONS 5,000 221 222 1200 -512 -5210 SUPPLIES _ 800 - - 223 22411200-512-5410 MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI 250 r - 225 -6510 RETENTION _ 0 _ - 228 227 1200- 512 RECORDS - - -� - 228 _ TOTAL _ $125,0461 229 23o -_� THIS PAGE IS .- PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C 231 FUND _ IGENERAL` 232 DEPARTMENT CITY MANAGER-.-----,-.-- 233 234 DIVISION FUNCTION CITY MANAGER 10 EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT 235 236 ACTUAL ADOPTED DEPARTMENT'S CITY MANAGER'S 237 236 _ ACCT- NO _ - _ - _ ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURES_ 2001_ -2002 _BUDGET_ I 2002 -2003 REQUESTS 2003 -2004 RECOMMENDATIONS r 2003 -2004 239 230 241 - - _ 1210 - -- SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS SALARIES & WAGES - REGULA $175,080 - - -- $227_,533 $237,409 $283,635 242 243 244 245 2110 TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES $175,080 F. I C. A. $11,647 L - $227,533 $17,406 _ $237,409 - - - $18,162 $283,635 $21_,698 246 2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 1 15,057 22,735 22,500 __ 37,880 247 - -- - i - _ __ 246 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE- $201,784 $267,674 $27 - $343,213 -- - - 249 250 251 - 34501 SERVICES & SUPPLIES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES $0 $0 1 $0 - $0 252 4060 AUTO ALLOWANCE 7_ ,200 7_,200 - 7,200 - 7,200 253 254 4065 4070 CITY MANAGER EXPENSE 8131 TRAVEL &CONFERENCE � _ _0 500 ] � __ _ 0 _ 1,000 � _ 1,500 1,000 i 750 255 4080,EMPLOYEE EDUCATION 199, 500 1 2,000 1 1,000 256 4630 4850 - _ REPAIR & M_AINT- OPERATING t _ 5.10 N_ON ADVERTISING 0 1,000 0 _ 1,200 0 0 0 257 _ -LEGAL - 2ss 259 5210 5410 SUPPLIES 2,8417 M- - - -- - - EMBER_SHIPS & SUBSCRIPITI 284 3,000 -- - ' 1,000 3,000 - - -- 1 1,000 -- - -- -- 2,000 j 750' 261 TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES - $11,847 $13,200 __ $16,900 $12,700 262 263 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE $213,631 $280,874 $294,971 $355,913 CAPITAL OUTLAY 265 266 6420 EQUIPMENT OFFICE 137 _ $0 $850 $0 267 268 6430 EQUIPMENT OPERATING 434 0 700 0 2ss ,TOTAL CAPITAL OUT LAY $571 $0 $1,550 $0 270 271 272 273 -- - _ TOTAL EXPENDITURES _ BUDGETED POSITIONS $214,202 31 $280,874 3 $296,521 3 -- $355,913 5 274 275 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B- C D 276 277 - --I - - IBUDGET CITY MANAGER -I COMMENTS 278 279 _ -1 FIY 2003 -2004 -.- 280 281 ACCT. NO. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PROPOSED 282 283 284 1310- 513 -1210 r SALARIES - REGULAR F I.C.A. $283,635 - 21,69.8 CITY MGR, ASST TO CITY MGR, A_ DMIN - - - - ASS_ T. - - 285 288 287 1310 -513 -2110 1310- 513 -2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE _ 37,880 T - - - - _ - -- - 288 289 131-1 0-613-3450 1 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - 0 - - - - - 290 291 1310 - 513 -4060 AU TO ALLOWANCE _ 7,200 AUTO ALLOWANCE FOR CITY MGR. -- 292 _ 293 1310 -513 -4065 CITY MANAGER EXPENSE I 1,000 294 295 - - -- 1310 - 513 -4_070 - -- - - TRAVEL & CONFERENCE {-- - - 1 750 -- - - - - -r 296 - 297 1310 - 513 -4080 !EMPLOYEE EDUCATION 1,000 299 300 1310 -513 -4630 MAINTENANCE &REP. -COMM. 0 _ r _ -- - - - - 30� 302 1310 -513 -5210 SUPPLIES _ _ 2,000 '-CARTRIDGES FOR PRINTERS AND FAX OTHER OFFICE SUPPLIES MACHINE_ - 303 304 1310-513-6410 MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI _ 750 T 305 306 307 -_ -- TOTAL -- -- $355,913 - - - - -- - - - - -- 308 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C D J 309 FUND (GENERAL _ 01 310 DEPARTMENTI CITY MANAGER 13r 311 DIVISION INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAI _ _ 15j 312 FUNCTION EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT 5.13 313 _ ADOPTED ACTUAL_ _ _ TOTAL - _ ------ - DEPARTMENT'S 314 - -___ 315 316 ACCT _ACCOUNT NO _� CLASSIFICATION BUDGET 2001-2002 EXPENDITURES + 2001 -2002 PROJECTIONS - L 2002 -2003 - _REQUESTS 2003- 2004 - 317 316 1SERVICES & SUPPLIES 319 320 3450 DEPARTMENT ADJUSTMENT._ CONTRACTUAL SERVICES $113,954 110,523 $135,000 $42,000 321 - 4070 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE __ 20,000 i 20,813 15,000 ( 10,000 322 323 - �- _ _ (TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES $133,954 11 1 $131,336 + $150,000 $52,000 324 325 - -- - - - - - - -77777777 T- - -- - 326 327 326 - ITHIS PAGE IS PRINTED - - -_ -- ON RECYCLED PAPER C - - - - - - -- -- CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A 8 C D I J 329 330 331 _ INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS BUDGET_ COMMENTS flY 2003 -2004 332 333 - ACCT_. NO. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PROPOSED � � _ - - - - -- - - - 334 334 335 336 337 1315- 513 -3450 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES #REFI 33811316-513-4070 TRAVEL& CONFERENCE #REF! 339 340 - -- -_ _ -- - - - 341 342 343 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED LTOTAL _ - ON RECYCLED PAPER #REF_ ! CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A e C D I J 344 j (GENERAL 345 DEPARTMENT FINANCE - 346 DIVISION OFFICE SERVICES `- 20 - 347 - FUNCTION FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRAT � 513 - - 346 - _ _ _ - ADOPTED -_- - DEPARTMENT'S CITY _ MANAGER'S 349 _ _ ACTUAL 350 351 ACCT NO ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURES - 2001 -2002 fi BUDGET 2002 -2003 REQUESTS 2003 -2004 _ 1 RECOMMENDATIONS 2003 -2004 352 353 _ SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS _ 354 _ 1210 SALARIES & WAGES - REGULA _ 88,42.8 $891584 _ $98,359 _ $93,882 355 356 _ TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES _ $88,428 $89,584 357 - -T 2310 _ GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 6,496 7,1291 6,853 8,733 7,524 8,366 7,182 9,806 359 360 - - - 361 - 'TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE $102,053 _ $105,170 $114,249 $110,870 362 3s3 SERVICES & SUP_PLIES t J 364 365 3450 4070 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TRAVEL & CONFERENCE $0 t $0 180 $0 100 $0 100 366 367 368 40801 4110 EMPLOYEE EDUCATION_ j CPOSTAGE _ 0 16,764 I 0 _ 18,000 f 200 26,000 ` 200 25,000 369 _ 4420 LEASE PURCH - POSTAGE MAC 3,858 4,080 4,060 4,060 370 371 4615 4620 MAINT & REP. OFFICE EQUIP M_AINT_& REP OPERATING EQU _ 2,055 - 1,112 _ 2,40 0 1,270 _ - _ 3,000 1,270 2,800 1,270 372 46301 MAINT & REP COMM EQPT 1 590 600 600 0 373 4TlWPRINTINGIBINDING 4_720 /PHOTO CO 22,453 } 29,700 l - 35,400 30,500 374 375 376 _ 5210 5220 PRINTING CONTRACTUAL_ SUPPLIES UNIFORMS -----5,470 _ 19,644 0 1,500 20,000 1 370 3,500 25,000 350 i 8,900 22,000 350 377 378 5410 MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI -�- 0 225 300 300 379 380 381 1TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES-1- TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE $71,9461 $173,999 $78,32 $183,495 $99,780 $21� $95,480 $206,350 382 _ 383 384 385 6420, _ _ 6430 CAPITAL OUTLAY EQUIPMENT OPERATING EQUIPMENT 1_ 0 - - 0 $0 _ _ 0 -- $2,500 _ _ 10,000 - - - -- $0 -- 10,000 386 387 _OTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY $0 $0 1 $12,500 - -- -_. $10,000 388 389 _ - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES - _ $173,999 _ - � _ $183,495 $226, 529 - $216,350 390 391 BUDGETED POSITIONS 2 2 2 - 2 392 393 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B c p I J -- OFFICE SERVICES1 BUDGET COMMENTS - ACCT. NO.' ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION -- - PROPOSED _ - - -- �- - -- [13 - - -- - —— -- — - - - 0- 513_- 1210iSALARIES - REGULAR $93,882 7,182 PURCHASING MGR AND CENTRAL SERVICES SPECIALIST 0- 513 -2110 F.LC.A. 0 - 513 -2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE CONFERENCE j ` 9,8060- 100 408 409 513 -4070 1320- 513 -_4080 TRAVEL & EMPLOYEE EDUCATION - 2_00 — 410 1 25,000 REGULAR BULK MAILS. NOTICES 411 412 413 132_0- 513 -4110_ 1320- 513.4420 POSTAGE _ —_ _ _ LEASE PURCHASE- POSTAGE _1 _ _ 4,060 & ALARMS CODE ENFCMNT NOTICES AND OTHERS LEASE FROM PITNEY BOWES - 414 41e 1320 - 513 -4616 iMAINT: OFFICE EQUIP 2,800 MAINTENANCE FOR OFFICE EQPTS — 418 417 418 419 1320- 513 -4620 - �MAINT.- OPERATING EQUIP �— - - _ 1,270 — MAINTENANCE FOR CHECKWRITERS AND SIGNER - -- - - - 420 421 422 1320 - 513 -4630 1320- 513- 4710'PRINT MAINTENANCE & REP. -COMMA /BINDICOP_YING 0 30,500 LEASE FOR PHOTOCOPYING MACHINES 1 423 424 — _ _ AND RISO PRINTER ate 1320 - 513.472011 PRINTING-CONTRACTUAL STATIONARY PRINTING SHELLS, LAND DEV CODE BOOK 427 1320- 513 -5210 SUPPLIES _ _ _8,900 _ 22,000 FINANCIAL REPORT AND AUDITORS COVERS, ETC. 428 429 430 1320-613-5220 UNIFORMS _ & _ 35_0 FOR _IN-HOUSE PRINTING JOBS 431 432 1320-613-5410 MEMBERSHIPS SUBSCRIPTI 300 NATIONAL GOVERNMENT PURCHASING MGR ASSOC. - -- 433 43a 435 a3s 1320- 513 -6430 OPERATING EQUIPMENT -j_ TOTAL — 10,000 $216,350 {SOFTWARE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH GA_S_B 34 AS REQUIRED BY GOVT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD. —_- — - 437 - - -__^ - aas THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A I B r c D 439 FUND GENERAL_ aao DEPARTMENT - - CITY MANAGER _ _ _ 13� f 441 442 DIVISION FUNCTION HUMAN RESOURCES FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRAT 30 - 5_13+ _ 443 ,4 445 _ ACCT ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION - ACTUAL i EXPENDITURES ! -- ADOPTE_D BUDGET_ DEPARTMENT'S REQUESTS CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATIONS NS 446 447 NO - _ 2001.2002 - 2002-2003 - 2003 -2004 2003 2004 _ aa8 SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS a49 _ -1210 SALARIES & WAGES - REGULA� - - - 87,290 - $131,432 - $108,359 _ - $108,359 450 451 452 453 - 2110 TOTAL SALARIES &WAGES F. I. C. A. _ $87,290 6,534 $131,432 1_0,055 $108,359 8,289 $108,359 8,289 454 2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE _ 7,120 _ 11,910 _ 8,800 9,877 455 2610 - - - -- EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PRO _0 � - - - _ 3,500 3,500 3,500 - 456 457 _4TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE $100,944:1 $156,897 $128,948 $130,025 458 - -- - - - -- - - = - -- - - - - -- - - - -- -- -� -- -- - - - -- - 459 _ 3160GPRE-EMPLOYMENT SERVICES & SUPPLIES PHYSICAL! { 2,489 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 461 462 3450 4070�TRAVEL ';CONTRACTUAL SERVICES _10,2_48 _ _ _ 0 _ 500 500 0 463 4s4 H4664110 4080 & CONFE_RENCE_ TRAINING. CITYWIDE POSTAGE _ _ 0 4,273 508 9_001 7,569 _ 0 -_- 6,000 300 _ 500 _ 3,500 300 467 468 469 463�MAINTENANCE 48501 5210 5310 &REP -COMM E ADVERTISING -NON LEGAL LIES -_ MISCELLANEOUS SEVERANC 5_90 3,651 - - 1_,657 0 350 3,500 _ 1,000 20,000 _ 0� 3,500 - 800 _ 0 __ 0 t 3,500 _ 25,000 470 5410 MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI 0 _ 350 350 -196 472 !TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES4 $23,612 $36,319 $14,950 $36,950 473 - - -- TOTA4 OPERATING EXPENSE $124,556 1 $193,216 $143,898 _ _ $166,975 4741 _ a76 477 6420 CAPITAL OUTLAY OFFICE EQUIPMENT 788 - $0 $0 _ $0 478 479 6430 - OPERATING EQUIPMENT ' 0 - 0 0 _ 0 4801 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY $788 - $0 - $0 - $0 - - - 481 482 _ - TOTAL EXPENDITURES URES _$125,344 $193,216 - _$143,898 $166,975 483 484 485 _ - - BUDGETED POSITIONS _ 3, - -- -- 3 - - 2 �� _ 2 48s THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER ' - - - -- CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B c p a87 488 489 _ — — _ _ —_- HUMAN RESOURCES BUDGET COMMENTS flY 2003- 2004 - - 490 491 492 493 _ ACCT. NO. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PROPOSED -- _ asa 495 496 1330- 513 -1210 1330 -513 -2110 SALARIES - REGULAR - F.I.C.A. _ _ $108,359H 8,289 — - - - -- - R. MANAGER & H.R. AS - r- -- = 497 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 9,877 498 499 5oo 501 1330 -513 -2310 1330- 513 -2510 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PRO — _ 3,500 _ - 502 503 1330.513 -3160 PRE- EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALT - — 3,000 — — — - -- - - 504 505 1330- 513 -4070 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE 5o6 1330-613-4080 CITYWIDE TRAINING 3,500 507 5oa - -- 1330 513 -4110 - - POSTAGE _ - -� —_300 - - - _ — — - - _ 509 510 511 133_0- 513 -4860 ADVERTISING -NON LEGAL _ 3,500 s12 513 1330- 513- 5210�SUP� PLIES j - — 800 - 514 1330- 513 -_5310 MISCELLANEOUS- SEVERANC -- _ 25,000 515 516 517 1330- 513 -5410 MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI _ 350 - _ - - -- - - - 516 519 520 TOTAL -- -- — $166,975 � — — — — -- 521 522 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A 1 8 C D J 523 FUND GENERAL 524 DEPARTMENT FINANCE ' __ _ 13 __ - 525 DIVISION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION 401 _ _ 526 527 FUNCTION - FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRAT 5_13 = - _ -- CITY 526 ACTUAL ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURES ADOPTED BUDGET DEPARTMENT'S MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATIONS 529 _ ACCT REQUESTS - j 530 531 _ NO _ 2001 -2002 2002 -2003 2003 -2004 1 2003-2004 - 532 53z 533 _ _ 1210 SARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS SALARIES & WAGES - REGU�- 60,233 � ._ - $60,323 - _ $62,435 --- $62,435 534 535 - TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES - $60,233 $60,32_3_ $62,435 1 $62,435 536 537 2110 F. I. C. A. s 4,6621r - 4,615 t 4,776 1 - - - 4,776 538 539 2310 -- -- GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE -- - - 3,874 -- - 4,539 ( - 4,664 t 41975 - 540 541 _ TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE - _- $68,70 $69,477 - $71,8751 - $72,186 542 - _ SERVICES & SUPPLIES 543 saa 3450 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES _ $0 $0 $20,00 _ $7,500 545 4070 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE _ " 0 _ 500 j 2,000 500 546 _ 40801TRAINING _ _ 0 750 _ 5,000 1,000 sal 549 4110 4445 1 POSTAGE - _ LEASE PURCHASE -AS 400 PURCHASE- INTERNET - 71 8,239 + 11,680 _ 0� 8,988 12_,000 500 12,0_00 38,000 _ 0 0 10,082 549 4450 LEASE _ 550 4630 MAINTENANCE & REP COMM E 846 0 600 0 551 _ 4632 4633 INTERNET SERVICE _ MAINTENANCE COMPUTER NT 34,426 6,350 37_,940 00 1 43,523 19,000 43,523 25,240 552 - - _18,5_ _ 553 4634 MAINTENANCE- INTERNET SFT _ 0+ - 0 _ 30,000 20,000 554 - 5210 SUPPLIES _ _ 884 2,197 5,000 1 2,500 555 - sss - ES & SUPPLIES TOTAL SERVICES _$62,496 $80,875 $175,623 $110,345 557 558 -_ TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE ....,� _ $131,205 $150,352 - $247,498 $182,531 559 560 CAPITAL OUTLAY - - - -- -- . - - - 561 562 6431OPERATING EQUIPMENT $11,040 $5,000 - - $57,000 563 _ _�- }-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY $11,0_40 $5,000 _ _ $57,000 $4.1,336' 564 sss sss TOTAL EXPENDITURES - $142,245 i __ _ $155,352_ _ $304,498 $223,867 567 _ BUDGETED POSITIONS 1 _ 1 1 ...568 569 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A: B C D I J 570 571 MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS BUDGET COMMENTS 572 573 r = - FN 2003 -2004 —1 -- -- 5741 575 ACCT. NO. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION - PROPOSED - - 576 - -- 577 578 1340- 513 -1210 SALARIES - REGULAR $62,435 1 MIS MANAGER 1 - 579 580 581 1340 -513 -2110 1340-513-2310 F.I.C.A. GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 4,776 4,975` 582 583 564 - 1340- 513 -3450 - - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - -- - - -- 7,500 -- - .- -� MAINTENANCE OF CITY _ WEBSITE - - - - -- -- 585 1340- 513 -40700 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE — 500 - 586 587 588 1340- 513 -4080 -= TRAINING - -- 1,00_0 589 590 591 13_40- 513 -4110 13.40- 513 -4_445 - POSTAGE LEASE PURCHASE -AS 400 - 0 0 - -- _ - - 592 ss3 - -- 1340 -513 -4450 - LEASE PURCHASE- INTERNET - 10,082 - - LEASE AGREEMENT_ FOR _ _ _— _ -- - 594 595 _ _ __ 1340- 513- 46321INTERNET __ SERVICE 43,523 CISCO ROUTER INTERNET SERVICES TO: _ - — -- 596 — _ _ — — CITY HALL -�_- AFTER SCHOOLHOUSE 598 599 _ tPUBLIC WORKS BUILDING MULTI -PURPOSE BUILDING 600 601 602 1340 - 513 -4633 - MAINTNCE- COMPUTER NETW - -- 25 240, _ - - MTCE AGREEMENT FOR (HTE MAIN APPLICATIONS) MICROSOFT_ AND CSG _ - -� - - — - 6o3 1340- 513 -4634 MAINTNCE- INTERNET SERVIC 20,000 LICENSES FOR THE SERVER 604 605 _ 1340- 513 -5210 SUPPLIES —AND _ _ 2,500 20 USERS OPERATING SOFTWARE BBACKUP TAPES AN_D OTHERS 606 6o7 608 609 13_40 - 513 -6430 OPERATING EQUIPMENT 41,336 -- - REPLACEMENTS FOR 10 PCs BACKUP STORAGE AND A REPLACEMENT L SERVER - - 610 - -- TOTAL 611 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C D I _J 612 FUND GENERAL _ 011 _ 613 614 615 DEPARTMENT IJA ISION FUNCTION FINANCE _ _ _ 141 FINANCIAL & ADMINISTRATIO FINANCIAL & ADMINISTRATIO 616 _ - - -- ACTUAL - - - ADOPTED DEPARTMENT'S - CITY - - MANAGER'S 617 616 ACCT ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURES BUDGET REQUESTS RECOMMENDATIONS 619 NO 2001-2002 2002 -2003 2003 -2004 - -- 2003-2004 - 620 621 SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS SALARIES & WAGES REGULA $288,272 $303,6841_ $322,61 -- $320,936 622 .'1210 - _ _ 623 624 1410 OVERTIME 53 750 500 i 500 625 _ TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES 288,325 304,434 _ 323,112 _ 321,436 626 6271 626 629 2110 2310 F i. C. A. -_ -_- GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE -- 21,145 } _ 21,566 23,289 I - 25,840 _ 25,330 -- - 29,051 630 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE $331,036 j $353,563 $373,150 L $375,077 631 632 633 _ 3450�CONTRACTUAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES SERVICES - -- _ $01 - - $0 - $O - - $0 634 635 636 - 4070 4080 4620 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE !EMPLOYEE EDUCATION MAINTENANCE-OPERATING E 1,914 L 718 912 1,550 2,200 1_,000 2,550 3,700- 2,000 1,550 2,200 1,000 637 638 639 4630$ 5210 5410 MAINTENANCE: _& REP -COMM E SUPPLIES _ MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI 590 _ 4,097 1,201 500 4,000 1,475 500 _ 5,000 1,475 r _ 0 4,500 1,475 640 641 642 643 _ TTOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE L _ $9,432 $340,468t----- - - $10,725 $364,288 _ $15,225 $388,386 - $10,725 -- - --$385,802 644 645 6461 6420 CAPITAL OUTLAY EQUIPMENT OFFICE - -- -- 80 - $0 - _ $0 _ - $0 6430 EQUIPMENT OPERATING 56 0 4,000 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY $136 $0 $4,000 $3,500 [655TIH41S TOTAL EXPENDITURES $340,604 $364,288 1 $392,385 BUDGETED POSITIONS 6 6 6 6 PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER, I CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A: B C D I J 656 FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION 657 BUDGET COMMENTS sss 659 _ - - ' F/Y 2003-2004 - - - -- —_ - - -_ - - - - 660 66� ACCT._ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PROPOSED - 662 - - - - - - - - - -= 663 664 665 1410- 513 -1210 SALARIES - REGULAR 320,936 DIRECTOR & 5 STAFF MEMBERS -- sss 1410 - 5134410 tOVERTIME 668 669 67o 671 1410 - 513 -2110 1410 - 513 -2310 F I.C.A. -- l- GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 24,590 -- — 29,051 - — - _ -- — - — - - 672 673 1410- 513 -3450 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - - - - - - -- — 0 - -- -- — - - - -- 674 1410- 513 -4070 TRAVEL &CONFERENCE 1,550 iCPE SEMINARS FOR DIRECTOR'S CPA LICENSE &OTHER' 675 s76 _ 1 1410 - 513- 4080'EDUCATION _ 2,200 BUSINESS TRAVEL 1 REIMBURSEMENTS — — - - -- - - I - -- - - 678 1.410- 513- 4620IMAINTENANCE- 1,000 MAINTENACEFOR_ DEPT'S 679 = -- -- _EQUIP. - -- - - - -- -_ `- _ _SOFTWARE _ 68011410-513-5210 681 682 1410- 513 -5410 SUPPLIES _ _ _ _ MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI _4,600 _ _ 1,475 ACCTS PAYABLE, PAYROLL CHECKS, jOCCUPATIONAL LICENSE AND OTHER SUPPLIES_ GOVT FINANCE OFCRS ASSOC, AICPA, FICPA 683 684 — — — APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF FINANCIAL REPORTS - 685 686 1410- 513_6430 OPERATING EQUIPMENT —_ 1 3,500 REPLACEMENT FOR WIDE CARRIAGE_ PRINTER USED FOR PAYROLL ACCTS PAYABLE REPORTS sal 688 — TOTAL _ $389 -30�- - -- — -- - 6e9 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET 690 691 A FUND DEPARTMENT B GENERAL - -- - - FI NANCE — C - -01 14 p - _ — _ - -- 692 DIVISION ; -- INSURANCE - - —_, 20 -- -- - -- - - 693 FUNCTION .OTHER GENERAL GOVT. SERV 519 — -- -- :_ 694 -- -- 1 -- — -- CITY 695 ACTUAL - _ EXPENDITURES ADOPTED BUDGET __ DEPARTMENT'S MANAGER'S 696 ACCT ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION REQUESTS RECOMMEND A_TIONS 697 NO — — 2001-2002 ' - - 2002 -2003 - — — 2003 -2004 2003 -2004 698 — — — — - -- — — - sss _ _ 2410 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 248,500 $193,500 $423,795 $432,795 700 701 -510 4510�PROP'TY UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSA & LIABILITY INSURA _ 35,000 2781746 _6,428 _ 2_29,000 15,000 28_7,500 _ 35,000 _ 268,246---..---'.- 702 4520 PUBLIC EMP. BLANKET BOND 1,126 -- _2,500 - 1,400 - - -- — 1,400 7oa 7o4 70s 4540 .4591 _ 4592 BOILER &_MACHINERY POLICE OFFICERS A.D.D. DEATH BENEFITS FOR PENSIO — _ _ 2,276 1,607 695 _ 3,000 __ 2,000 2,000 _ _2,750 3,500 2,000 — -- _ _ 2,750 _ - -- - -- 2,000 706 -- -- 707 707 _ TOTAL SERVICES &SUPPLIES ' $489,632 $5051500 $736 691 $756,191 708 7os THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF -SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A '' g C p 710 711 712 _ - - < NON - DEPARTMENT DGET COMMENTS 003 -2004 - - FIY 2001-26-0-4--- � INSURANCE ;- - - -- - - - - -- -- - -- - - - 713 714 715 ACCT. NO. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION _ PROPOSED - - $432,795 - -- _ - - -- - -- - -- - -- - - WORKERS COMP COVERAGE FOR ALL EMPLOYEES - - 717 718 1420 - 519 -2410 J 1420- -2510 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 719 519 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSA 35,000 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS ... - -- 721 1420- 519 -4510 LIABILITY INSURANCE -- 278,746 AUTO, PROPERTY AND LIABILITY' COVERAGE---------- 722 - PUBLIC EMPLOYEES BLANKE 723 724 1420- 5194520 _ 1,400 BOND FOR THE CITY MGR -� & FINANCE DIRECTOR AGAINST EMBEZZLEMENT_ 725 726 1420- 519 -4540 BOILER &MACHINERY _ 2,750 COVERAGE FOR A/C UNITS _ �- 727 1420- 519 -4591 POLICE A D D. _ 3,500 - - - -� - -- STATUTORILY REQ'D LIFE INSURANCE 728 & ACCIDENTAL DEATH & DISME_M_I3ERMENT FOR POLICE 729 730 1420-519-4592, -- - EATH BENEFITS FOR PENSIO - 2,000 - — - - -- - - 731 — 732 -- � - -eoo 733 ____ THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLEDPAPER ' - - -- -- - CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A; B C D I I I J 73a FUND GENERAL - - ` -- - ^ -01 735 DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY 15 736 737 DIVISION FUNCTION CITY ATTORNEY LEGAL COUNSEL 00 514 _ _ 738 739 - _ _ - -- ACTUAL -� - - -- J ADOPTED i- DEPARTMENT'S _CITY MANAGER'S 740 ACCT ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION r^ EXPENDITURES _BUDGET - - REQUESTS - - - - RECOMMENDATIONS 741 742 - - NO 2001 -2002 - - - 2002 -2003 - - -- 2003 - 2004; - - - -- -� 2003 -2004 - -- 743 744 _ 3120 SERVICES & SUPPLIES LEGAL SERVICES - RETAINER 90;000 $97,000 $97,000 $97,000 3410LEGAL SERVICES NON RETAI 91,679 50,000 _ _ 745 746 7a7 3420 3435 - CONSULTING- TELECOMMUNIC CONSULTING -REAL PROP /FOR _ 228 28,198 - 15,000 - 20,000 80,000 20,000 15,000_ 80,000 20,000 15,000 748 3440 CONSULTING -LABOR ! 14,343 15,000 10,000 10,000' 749 3450 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 980 10,000 _ 130,000 - 1301000 750 751 ' 3451 3452 CONTRACTUAL SVCS -COURT CONTRACTUAL SVCS -CODE E 1,022 11673 2,375 15,000 10,000 __ 18,000 10,000 1$,000 752 753. _ 4070 5210 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE - SUPPLIES----- - 836 0 - 1,200 250 1,200 _ 250 1,200 _ 250 754 -' 5410 MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI 532_ 800 __ 800 __ 800 755 ( 756 _ - - TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES - - _$229,491 - -� $226,625 - - $382,250 $382,250 757 758 759 _ - TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE _ - $229,4.91 _ $226,625 ` - $382,250 - - -- - $382,25.0 760 CAPITAL OUTLAY - -- _ - -- - - - - - - 761 762 763 - 6420 EQUIPMENT OFFICE TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY - - $0 - - $0 $0 _ $0 -$0 - -_$0 $0 $0 765 766 767 TOTAL EXPENDITURES BUDGETED POSITIONS $229,491 0* $226,625 0* -�-- -- $382,250 _ - ______� 0* -- - -- $382,25 = '_ 0* 768 _ _ _ - 769 770 *1 CITY ATTORNEY CURRENTLY - RETAINED UNDER L - -- CONTRACT - - - - - -- 771 772 -- - -- - 773 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED 'PAPER - - - -- - - CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET 77a 775 776 A g _ C D CITY ATTORNEY BUDGET COMMENTS FIY 2003 -2004 _ ' — I - J - - 777 778 ACCT. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION — -- - PROPOSED _ — - - — -- - - -- - — - 779 N0. 780 781 1500 - 514 -3120 LEGAL SERVICES - RETAINER —` : 97,000 - - 782 783 784 1500- 514 -3410 LEGAL SERVICES - NON RETAI 80,000 — 785 1500 - 514 -3420 CONSULTING- TELECOMMUNIC 20,000 - — -- -- 786 - -- -- -- - - - - -- 787 788 789 1500- 514 -3435 -- - 1500- 514 -3440 CONSULTING -REAL PROPIFORI 'CON ATTORN 15,000 - 10,000 - - _ -- 790 - - - -- -- — — - - - = -- - 791 792 7931 1500 -514 =3450 15_00 514 34ONTRACTU_AL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES SVCS -COURT 130,000 - 10,000 - _ - - -� - -- — 794 -- - 795 796 7s7 15.00- 514 - 3_452 — 1.500 -514 -4 70 CONTRACTUAL SVC -CODE EN - -- TRAVEL & CONFERENCES - 1,200 - - -- - - -- 798 1500- 514 -5210 1500-614-5410 _ SUPPLIES MEMBERSHIPS _— 250 — 799 801 sot — & SUBSCRIPTI — -- 800 - -- — - - - - -- -- -- - 803 804 _ kTOTAL _ $382,250 805 - eo6 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER - — -- CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET 8o7 A FUND _ _ DEPARTMENT DIVISION - -g' GENERAL BLDG, ZONING & COMMUNITY BUILDING C 01 16 10 D J eo8 869 810 FUNCTION PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS 524 - - - - 811 912 813 814 ACCT NO _ ACTUAL ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURES � ADOPTED BUDGET 2002 - -- DEPARTMENT'S REQUESTS -- CITY _ MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATIONS - -2002_ -2003 2003 -2004 - 2003-2004 815 816 817 1210 1410 -2001 SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS SALARIES & WAGES - REGULA 128,737 OVERTIME _ $132,621 -_ $146,283, - $142,501 818 - _ 53 - -__ 3,000 6,000 2,500 820 - TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES $128,790 $135,621 ` $152,283 - - - - -- $145,001 821 -- -- 8zz 823T-- _ 2110 F. I. C. A. GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 11,582 _ 10,803 18,465 12,040 11,650 13,825 14,681 825 826 _ T0 TAL PERSONNEL SERVICE - - - - $151,175 - $166,126 - $17_7,7.58 - $177,337 - Sze - rSERVICE S & SUPPLIES - - - - -- - 828 _ 3150 3450 CQNTRACT INSPECTORS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES _ 118,0261 _ _ 5,353 -6,- 10-0 5,000 _ 25,000 _ 20,000 82s 830 4070�TRAVEL 4080, & CONFERENCE_ EMPLOYEE- EDUCATION 666 231 t _ 600 2,350 1,500_ 2,500 1,000 831 832 833 4630 _ 5210 MAINTENANCE & REP -COMM E SUPPLIES_ 638 1,782 660 2,240 _ 700 6,000 6-16 0 9,500 834 52201 UNIFORMS -- -- ` 0 - 0 - - 835 5410�MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI _ 662 1,275 0 836 - TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES -- -- -- - $127,357 - - $138,225 $163,600 - - - 60 - _.- - -- - - $150,900 83� 838 839 _ TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE - - $278,532 $304,351 _ _ $341,358 - } $328,237 + -- 840 841 sae 6420 CAPITAL OUTLAY EQUIPMENT OFFICE _ _ $0 0 - _ $0 650 - -- - _ $800 -- - - - $800 843 6430 EQUIPMENT OPERATING 0 0 844 - - 845 846 -- TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY - - -- - -- $0 _ - $650 $800 - - - $800 . - 847 - TOTAL EXPENDITURES - -_ $278,532 - $306,001 342158 - $ �- $329,037 848 sas _BUDGETED POSITIONS 3 _ r e 850 _- PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 3 _ 3 - -3 - - -- - 951 ITHIS CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C D I J 852 BUILDING DIVISION 853 BUDGET COMMENTS 854 FIY 2003 =2004 855 856 ACCT. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PROPOSED 857 858 NO.' - 1� -- - -- -- - `& 85s 1610- 524 -1210 SALARIES - REGULAR $142,501 DIRECTOR 2 STAFF 860 861 16_10- 524 -1410 - !OVERTIME — 2,500 — -- - 863 1610 - 524 -2_110 F.I.C.A. 17,655 864 MECHANICAL INSPECTOR: rPLUMBING 865'1610-524-2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE — 14,681 - — INSPECTOR -- - -- -- - 866 — _ ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR 867 1610- 524 -3150 CONTRACT INSPECTORS _ 126,100 BLDG /ROOF INSPECTOR 868 _ _STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 869 ,1610 - 524 -3450 - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - - -- 20,000 SPECIAL INSPECTIONS /REVIEW - 870 _ �- -- -__ - -- 871 1610 - 524 -4070 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE 1,500 FL ASSOC O_F_OCCUP LIC OFCL _ 87z — CONSTRUC_TION SEMINAR 873 874 1610- 524 -4080 EMPLOYEE - EDUCATION 1,0_00 BLDG OFFICIAL;CERTFCTN TUITN 875 876 ,1610- 524 -5210 SUPPLIES 1,500 REIMBSMNT(30 @$50ea) 877 878 1610 -524'. -5410 MEMBERSHIPS' & SUBSCRIPTI' 800 AMERICAN INST OF ARCHITECTS 879 11 - — - - -- - --- aeo ' 1610 - 524 -6420 OFFICE EQUIPMENT -- 800 2 FILE CABINETS 881 _ $329,037 -- — - e82 TOTAL — — - -- -- 883 - 884 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A :' B! C D I J 885 FUND (GENERAL DEPARTMENT BLDG, ZONING & COMMUNITY 01 16 886 887 DIVISION GEN ADMINISTRATN & PLANNI 201 888 889 FUNCTION PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS 524 = -� --_ -- � -- - -- CITY - 890 ACTUAL ADOPTED _DEPARTMENT'S MANAGERS' 891 892 ACCT _ NO ACCOUNT_ CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURES 2001 -2002 BUDGET 2002 -2003 REQUESTS 2003 -2004 RECOMMENDATIONS 2003 -2004 _ 893 894 8951 896 1210 _1410 SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS SALARIES & WAGES _REGULA OVERTIME $289,839 432 $253,445 2,000 - $267,474 1,000 _ $294,831 1,000 - 897 1 698 899 TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES - 290,271 - - 255,4_45 268,474 _ _ 295,831 - 900 901 2110 _ 2310 F. I. C. A. _ - GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE _ 22,530 18,178 19,542 24,044 _ 20,538 22,310 - [ 22,631 - 29,399 sot 903 9oa go5l 9061 - - 3100 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE SERVICES & SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL_ SERVICES _$330,979 650 $299,031 $311,322 _ $10,000 -- - - - - _ $347,861 $5,000 9o7 3450 3480 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MICROFILMING _ _ 42,913 - _$5,000 43,269 - 46,800 r 46,800 908 909 4070 4080 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EMPLOYEE EDUCATION _ 0� 1,954 849 _ 2,500 2,00 1,000 30,000 2,000 _ _ 30,000 2,000 910 911 _ 4630�MAINTENAN_ - CE &_REP -COMM E� _ 1,410 1,000 1 _ 1_,000 2,000 _ 500 1,000 912 _ 5210 SUPPLIES 2,933 3,000 3,000 _ _ 2,500' 913 914 5410 MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI 2,131 1,600 2,000 1,700 - 915 916 -- - � TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES -- $52,840 $59,369 -i- $96,800 ; - 917 918 _ TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE $383,8.19 $3581400 1 $408,122 - r $437,361 - - -- 919 920 - _ 6420 CAPITAL OUTLAY EQUIPMENT OFFICE 33-8 $0 $® 921 6430 EQUIPMENT OPERATING _ 0 - - 0 - _ 1,300 0 922 923 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY _ $338 $0 $1,300 $0 925 TOTAL EXPENDITURES - $384,157 $409,422 _ $437,361 926 927 - BUDGETED POSITIONS.----------.- _ 6 5.5 5.5 6 928 - - - - - - 929 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PRO'POS'ED EXPENDITURES BUDGET 25 PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.873 MILLS -1.5 MILLS INCREASE A B ,' C D I J s30 931 GEN ADMINISTRATN &'PLANNING BUDGET COMMENTS _ 93z 933 FN 2003 -2004 934 935 ACCT.' NO. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PROPOSED _— - - -- - -- -- 93s -- 937 c1620- 524 -1210 SALARIES - 'REGULAR $294,831 DIRECTOR & 5 STAFF - 938 — — -- -- —— -- - - - 93s - - 1620- 524 -1410 — OVERTIME 1,000 - 940 - — - - -- -------...._-_.__ - 941 942 1620- 524 =2110 F.LC.A. 22,631 943 1620 -524 -2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 29,399 944 -- - -- -- — -- - - 945 946 947 1620 -524 -3100 - 1620 -524 -3_450 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,000 -_�- 46,800 PLANNING/TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PLANNING CONSULTANT 948 _ — _ $30@a 60 HRS - 26 PERIODS _ 949 1620- 524 -3480 _ MICROFILMING 30,000 f 7 -YR BACKLOG MICROFILMING 950 951 952 —�— 1620- 524 -4070 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE -- 2,000 -- AIA CONFERENCE APA CONFERENCE -- - -- - - - -- 953 1620- 524 -4080 EMPLOYEE -EDUCATION 500 PLANNING SEMINARS & CLASSES 954 95s 1620-624-4630 — MAINTENANCE-COMM EQPT. -- _ 1,00_0 — _ — _- sss — 957 1620-62 4 -5210. SUPPLIES 2,500 PRINTER &'FAX CARTRIDGES I 958 COPY MACHINE CARTRIDGES 95911620-524-5410 MEMBERSHIPS '& SUBSCRIPTI 1,700 1AIA, APAIAICP, DAD_E CNTY MGRS_ 960 ASSOC,PLANNING ADVISORY'SVC _ 961 1620- 524 -6420 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 963 TOTAL $437,361 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER sss 25 PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.873 MILLS -1.5 MILLS INCREASE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A I B'' C D 966 FUND GENERAL _ 01 _ 967 DEPARTMENT BLDG, ZONING &COMMUNITY 16 968 DIVISION CODE ENFORCEMENT - 40 _ 969 FUNCTION CODE ENFORCEMENT 524 9701 CITY ' 'ADOPTED DEPARTMENT'S MANAGER'S: ACCT ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURES_ BUDGET REQUESTS RECOMMENDATIONS NO ' 2001 -2002 2002 -2003 2003 -2004 2003 -2004. SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS _ IACTUAL 1210 _ 1410 SALARIES & WAGES - REGULA SALARIES & WAGES - OVERTI ' ` $164,816 ` 166 _ $1721734 _ 2,500 $180,215 2,225 $179,973 2,226 TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES 1 $164,982 $175,234 $182,440 $182,137 981 _ 2110 F.1. C. A. 12,601 13,405 13,957 _ 13,933 982 - 2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 14,30 _ 17,523 _ 16,585 19,557 _ 983 sea TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE _ - $191,886 $206,162 $212,982 $215,627 985 986 SERVICES & SUPPLIES 987 __4070 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE_ - _ $424 �_ $812 $1,250 $1,000 986 989 4080 4620 EDUCATION MAINTENANCE & REP -OPER. E - 395 _ _ 201 520 510 _ 2,290 540 1,000 540 990 991 _ 4630 5210 MAINTENANCE & REP -COMM. SUPPLIES _ 2,139 21314 _ 0 1,250 0 3,603 0 2_,500 992 5220 _� UNIFORMS 86 _ 680 _ 423 _ - 423 993 5410 MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI 90 90 370 _ 370 994 995 TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES 5,6_49 - 3,862 _ 8,476 -5,833 996L 997 1----- _ TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE _ $197,535 $210,024 _ $221,458 $221,460 998 999 j CAPITAL OUTLAY I 1000 6420 OFFICE EQUIPMENT - _ 0 _ _ $0 _ $390 1 $390 1001 6430 OPERATING EQUIPMENT -- - 3381 - _ 0 _ 500 - 500 - 1002 1003 - $338 = - - - -- -$0 -- $890 $890 1004 1005 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $197,873 $210,024 _ _ $222,348 -- - $222,350 1006 __ _ __ ____ ____ ______ __-- -_____ 1007 _ _ BUDGETED POSITIONS _ _ 4 _ _ _ _ 41 _ 4 4 loos THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER _ _ loos - 1o10 THIS DIVISION'S BUDGET IS BEING TRANSFERRED FROM PUBLIC WORKS FOR 2002/03 FISCAL YEAR CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C D I J 1011 L -- CODE ENFORCEMENT 1012 _ - BUDGET COMMENTS 1013 FN 2003- 2004 1014 1015 ACCT. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PROPOSED _ — 1016 1017 NO. 1018 1640- 524 =1210 SALARIES -REGULAR $179,912 - CODE ENFCMNT MGR & 3 CODE ENFCMNT 0FCRS 1019 - -- I - - - - -- lozo 1640 -524 -1410 SALARIES & WAGES - OVERTI 2,225 - 1021 1022 1640-524 -2110 F.1. C. A. — 13,933 -- 1023 - — -- - - -- - - - -___ 1o24 1640524 -2310 'GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 19,557 1025 - -- - - -- -.- 1o26 1640524 -4070 TRAVEL `& CONFERENCE 1,000 10271 i - -- loza 1640 - 524 4080 EMPLOYEE EDUCATION 1,000 - -. 1029 1030 1640 7524 74620 MAINTENANCE & REP -OPER. E _ 640_1 MAINTENANCE OF 3 CAMERAS -- 1031 1032 1640- 524 -5210 _ SUPPLIES 2,500 INKCARTRIDGES &OTHER SUPPLIES 1033 -5220 UNIFORMS — 423 - - FOR _3 CODE ENFORCEMENT 1640- 524 -5410 - _ MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI 370 OFFICERS l1640524 1640- 524 -6420 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 390 1 4- DRAWER FILE CABINET 1640 524 -6430 iOPERATING EQUIPMENT 500 DIGITAL CAMERA TOTAL $222,350 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B -' c p I J 1045 FUND GENERAL 01 1046 DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS 1o47 DIVISION SUMMARY XX 1o49 FUNCTION PHYSICAL ENVIRMNT /GENRL XXX 1049 - -- - -_ - CITY -- 1050 _ ACTUAL _ ADOPTED DEPARTMENT'S MANAGER'S 1051 ACCT ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURES BUDGET REQUESTS RECOMMENDATIONS 1o52 NO 2001-2002 2002 -2003 2003 -2004 2003-2004 1053 - - - - 1054 SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS 10551 1210 SALARIES & WAGES - REGULA _ ' $1,163,627 $1,095,333 $1,204,315 1056 1410 OVERTIME 43,972 28,100 _$_1,498,348 48,400 _ 29,400` 1057 1056 TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES $_1,207,599 $1,123,433 $1,546,748 _ $1,233,715 1059 _ _ 2110 F.1. C. A. 91,808 8&,_94_3j__ 5,943 j 118,326 94,379 loco 1061 2310 GROUP HEALTH RA CE INSUN - 105,686 _ 113,395 _ 168,73 - 150,829 1062 _ TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE $1,405,093 $1,322,771 $1,833,806 $1,478,923 1063 - 10s4 _ SERVICES & SUPPLIES 1065 _ 3100 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $8,119 $20,000 $20,000 $10,000 1066 1067 1068 3150 3450 3470 ENGINEERING - -- - -- CONTRACTUAL INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT -RE 800 _ 45,280 81,000 0 _ 101,628 80,000 0 2_27,013 89,000 _ 0 _ 81,400 84,000 1069 4070 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE - 1,846 1,724 4,500 2,250 1070 4080 EDU_C_ATION 1,802 , 6,566 8,900 3,850 1071 - 4310 4320 UTILITIES- ELECTRIC UTILITIES _ _ 70,48_5 68,000 _ _72,000 70,000 1072 _ -WATER 7,956 12,000 _ 17,000 12,000 1073 4340 REFUSE DISPOSAL FEE'! 509,866 475,000 536,456 520,000 1074 4410 LEASE PURCHASEIEQUIPMEN - _0 - _ 0 11500 1,000 1075 4455 LEASE PURCHASE- TRUCKS - 45,483 _ 42,940 134,507 168,499 1076 4620 MAINT & REP.- OPERATING EQ - 921 _ 1,500 11500 1,000 1077 4625 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE----_---- TO 0 45,000 _ 55,000 1078 4630 MAINT & REP. -COM EQUIP. M. 3,840 3,240 _ 3,920 500 1079 1080 1081 4640 _ 4650 _ 4670 MAINT &_REP. -SIRS & PKWAY PARKS & STREETS EL_ECTRICI MAINT & REP. - GROUNDS & STS _ 4,753 ; 83,324 - 39,390 20,000 87,000 49,000 15', ,000 90,000 61,805 _ _ 14,000 87,000 50,500 1082 _ 4680 MAINT & REP.- OUTSIDE SERVI 67,122 - 60,0000 _ _ 75,000 _ _ 85,000 1083 1084 1085 1086 5210 _ 5220 5230 5240 SUPPLIES - -'- UNIFORMS FUEL & LUB. 1 PARTS 12,632 _ 8 ' 367 - - - - 124,350 47,706 13,012 11, 263 140,000 _ 63,000 26,4001 _ 15, 3151 160,000 61,500 _ 20,650 -- - 13 139915 140,000 55,000 1087 5245 TOOLS 629 _500 1,500 1,000 1088 6260TIRES _ 19,478_ 25,000 _21500 loss 5260 CHEMICALS/SUPPLIES - 7,781 _ 9,000_ _ 9,000 9,000_ logo 5270 PERMITS 817 720 750 750 1061 5410�MEMBERSHIPS - - & SUBSCRIPTI -- _ 1,678 - - - - -- 1,260 _ 1;760 11260 R1094 1095 _ _ TOTAL SERVICES _& SUPPLIES TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE_ CAPITAL OUTLAY $1,195,425 - $2,600,518 $1,292,353 $2,615,124 $1,702,826 $3,536 - $1,487,574 _ $2,966,497 - 1096 1097 _ - 6420 EQUIPMENT OFFICE _ $0 _ $5,000+ _ $ _ - $0 lose 6430� EQUIPMENT OPERATING $1,138 $0 $214,596 $51,250 .loss 1100 - - TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY $1,138 - -- t $0 - - $219,596 -- - $51,250 1101 - - 1102 _. -- - TOTAL EXPENDITURES _$2,601,656 - $2,615,124 - -- -___$3 756;228 _ -- $3,017,747 1103 --- =e_ 1104 ^ BUDGETED POSITIONS - - 34 28 - 42 _ 33 1105 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A 8 C D 1 J 1106 FUND GENERAL 01 107 DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS _ - 17 11oe DIVISION BUILDING MAINTENANCE 10 11o9 FUNCTION OTHER GENERAL GOVT. "SVCS 519 - _ _ _ CITY 1111 ACTUAL ADOPTED DEPARTMENT'S MANAGER'S 1112 ACCT! ACCOUNTCLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURES BUDGET REQUESTS RECOMMENDATIONS 1113 NO - _ _2001 -2002 2002 -2003 -- 2003 -2004 2003 -2004 - 1114 - -- 1115 1116 1210 SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS SALARIES & WAGES - REGULA� $149,650 $189,237 $258,845 $143,225 1117 1410 OVERTIME 4,259 4,500 6,000 6,000 1118 1119 _ TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES $153,909 $193,737 ` ; $264,845 $149,225 1120, 1121 21101. 1. C. A. ? 11,565 14,821 20,261 1122 2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 16,478 23,902 37,418 19,336 1123 11 24 1125 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE I $181,952 $232_,460 _ $322,524 _ _ $1 79,977 1126 SERVICES & SUPPLIES_ 1127 3460C CONTRACTUAL SERVICES $44,743 $65,000_ _ $129,385 _ $20,000 1128 _ 4080 EDUCATION _ 0 192 75_0 350 1129 4310 UTILITIES- ELECTRIC _ - 70,485 68,000111 72,000 70,000 1130 4320 UTILITIES -WATER _ _ _ 7,956, 17,000 _ _ 12,000, 1131 MAINT & REP.- OPERATING EQ _ 545 500 500 500 1132 _____4620_ 4630 MAINT & REP.-COMM. EQPT. 615 720 720 0 1133 4670 MAINT & REP.- GROUNDS & ST 39,390 49,000 56,805 48,000 113a 5210 SUPPLIES 9,230 8,000 17,000 15,000 1135 5220jUNI� FORMS 1,061 1,800 3,150 _ 1,800 1136 _ 1137 1138 _ TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES � - - f : $174,025 -- $205,212 - $297,310 $167,650 -- _ -- - _ 1136 1140 - - - -� TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE $355,977 - -- - - $437,672 _ $619,834 - - - $347,627 -- -- - 1141 CAPITAL OUTLAY 1142 6420 OFFICE EQUIPMENT_ _ _ 01 $0 $0 _ $0 11431 6430 OPERATING EQUIPMENT 1,138 0 3,900 - 3,900 1144 1145 1146 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY $1,138 $0 $3,900 $3,900 1147 TOTAL EXPENDITURES - $357,115 $437,672 $623,734 $351,527 1148 1149 BUDGETED POSITIONS 6 6 9 4 1150 i 1151 THIS PAGE IS 'PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 29 PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.873 MILLS -1.5 MILLS INCREASE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C I D 1 J 1152 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1153 BUDGET COMMENTS 1154 -_ - -- _F/Y'.2003._-2004_____ - -- - 1155 -- 1156 ACCT. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PROPOSED 1157 1158 1159 NO. } -- 17.10- 519 -1210 - - SALARIES - REGULAR -- - - - - - _ _ -- - - =- 1160 1161 1710 -519 -1410 OVERTIME -- -- - 1162 1163 1710- 519 -2110 F.I.C.A. 11,416 ---- - - - - -- - 1164 1165 1710- 519 =2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 19,336 1166 1167 1168 1169 1710- 519 -3450 1710- 519 -4080 -- - - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE EDUCATION - - -- -- 20,000 - 350 - - -- - - - - -- - -- - -- -- - - 1170 1171 1172 1710- 519 -4_310 � - UTILITES- ELECTRIC - 70,000 -- - - -- 1173 1710- 519- 43201UTILITIES - - -WATER - _ 12,000+ _ - 1174 I 1175 1710- 519-4620 MAINT & REPAIR OPER EQUIP- 500 1176 1177 1710- 519 -4630 MAINT & REPAIR -COMM. EQPT 0 - 1178 1179 1181 1710- 519 -4670 1710- 519 -5210 MAINT & REPAIR-GDS &,STR SUPPLIES - -, -� 48,000 15,000 - -- - - - -- 1182 1183 1710- 519 -5220 UNIFORMS - _ 1,8_00 - - - - - - - 1184 1185 1186 1710-519-6430 OPERATING EQUIPMENT_ - - _ 3,900 - -- 1187 _ TOTAL $351,527 - - - 1188 _ 1189 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED 'PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C D FUND __GENERAL 01 N DEPARTMENT DIVISION FUNCTION PUBLIC WORKS SOLID WASTE COLLECTION PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT 17 20 534 1194 CITY 1195 ACTUAL ADOPTED DEPARTMENT'S MANAGER'S 1196 1197 ACCT NO ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURES 2001 -2002 BUDGET 2002 -2003 REQUESTS_ 2003 -2004 RECOMMENDATIONS 2003-2004 1199 1199 SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS 12001 1201 1210 1410 SALARIES & WAGES - REGULA OVERTIME $432,778 33,095 $407,2831 17,800 $509,091 - _ 26,000 _ $424,971 _ 10,000 1202 1203 TOTAL SALARIES &WAGES $465,873 $425,083 1 $535,091 _ $434,971 1205 1206 2110 <2310 F. I. C. A. GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 35,473 46,828 32,519 46,622 40,934 58,570 33,275 58,403 1207 _ 1206 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE _ $548,174 $504,224 $634,595 _- $526,649 1209 1210 1211 3470 SERVICES & SUPPLIES INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT -RE _ $81,000 $80,000 ,. $89,000 � $84 000 1212 1213 4080 4340 EDUCATION REFUSE DISPOSAL FEE 0 _ 509,866 200 - 475,000 250 _ 536,456 250 _520,000 1214 - 4455 LEASE PURCHASE TRUCKS 0 0 _ 0 107,184 -- _ -- - - -_ 1215 1216 5210 5220 SUPPLIES UNIFORMS 997 3,681 1 1,000 _ 4,548 1,250 5,000 1,000 5,000 1217 12181 _- TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES $595,544 $560,748 _$631,956 _ $717,434- 1219 1220 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE $1,143,718 $1,064,972 $1,266,551 $1,244,083 1221 1222 CAPITAL OUTLAY -- - -_ 1223 6430 OPERATING EQUIPMENT $0 $0 $0 $0 1224 12251 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY _ $0 $0 __ $0 - $0 1226 12271 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $1,143,718 ` $1,064,972 $1,266,551 $1,244,083 1228 1229 ' BUDGETED POSITIONS 15 12 15 14 1230 -- -- 1231 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C D 1232 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION 1233 BUDGET COMMENTS 1234 FN 2003- 2004 1235 1236 ACCT. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PROPOSED 1237 NO. - - - - - - - -- - - 1238 1239 1720- 534 -1210 SALARIES - REGULAR $424,971 1240 1241 1720 -534 -1410 OVERTIME 10,000 1241 1243 1244 1720 - 534- 211�C.A. 33,275 1245 1246 1720- 534 -2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 58,403 _ 1247 1720- 534 -3470 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT -RE _ _ 84,000 _ 1248 1249 1720 - 534 -4080 EMPLOYEE EDUCATION ' 250 -- x- - - - - - - -- - 1250 1251 1720- 534 -4340 REFUSE DISPOSAL FEE 520,000 1 NEW EQPTS. ANNUAL PAYMENTS 1252 1 107,184 107,184 KNUCKLE BOOM 1253 1254 1720- 534- 4455EASE PURCHASE LOADER TRASH TRUCK _ 24,013 15,063 1255 _ t{ _ _ 2 AUTOMATED GARBAGE TRUCKS #or 5 ears_ 1256 1257 1720- 534 -5210 SUPPLIES----- 1,000 _ - --- 1258 1259 1720- 534 -5220 UNIFORMS _ 5,000 1280 - 1261 $1,244,083+ - - - - - 1262 - - -- -___ - 1263 -- THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER - CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET 1264 1265 A FUND DEPARTMENT DIVISION B c GENERAL 01�_ PUBLIC WORKS - _177'I STREET & LANDSCAPE MTCE 30 D I J 1266 1267 FUNCTION -- OTHER GENERAL GOVT. SERV 541 - - - - - - -- 126e _ ACCT' _ ACTUAL ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURES ADOPTED BUDGET DEPARTMENT'S REQUESTS CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATIONS [1269 NO 2001 2002 2002 -2003 2003 -2004 _ 2003 2004 1274 1275 _1210 1410 SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS SALARIES & WAGES - REGULA ' $39,139 OVERTIME _ 3,113 $40,656 0 $253,957 10,900 $192,925 8_1900 1276_ 1277 1278 1279 2110 TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES _ $42,252 F.'1. C. A. ` 3,212 _- $40,656 3,110 $264,857 20,262 $2011825 1_5,440 lzso 2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 3,330 3,783 28,803 _ 28,879- 1281 1282 1283 _ _ TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE - $48,794 -- - - - $47,549 $313,922 -_ r $246,144 -- - 1284 _ 34501 SERVICES & SUPPLIES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES $0 $0 ' $36,000 - $36,000 1285 1286 1287 _ 4080 4455 _ EDUCATION 0 LEASE PURCHASE TRUCKS 0 200 0 1,400 12,30 1,000 6,878 1288 1289 1290 4625 4630�MAINT 4640 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 0 & REP -COMM. EQUIPME 0 MAINT & REP: STRS & PARKW 4,753j_____ _ 0 0 20,000 45,000 850 16,000 _ 55,000 j 0 14,000 1291 1292 4650 4670 ELECTRICITY MAINT &'REP -GRDS & STRUCT -- 83,324 0 87,000 0 _ 90,0_00 5,000 8.7,000 2,500 5210 SUPPLIES 1,342 7,350 2,850 2,850 5220 UNIFORMS 400 750 3,000 2,950 F1293: 5245 TOOLS _ 0 _ 0 1,000_ 500 TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES $89,819 $211,409 - $208,678 1298 12ss 1300 1301 _ TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE CAPITAL OUTLAY $138,613 - _._____$l09,300 $156,849 - $525,331 - - $454,822 - - 6420 OFFICE EQUIPMENT $0 _ $0 $0 $0 1302 1303 1304 6430 OPERATING EQUIPMENT 0 _0 170,000 _ 10,000' 1305 TOTAL CAPITAL ,OUTLAY $0 $0 $170,000 $10,000 P1307 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $138,613 $156,849 $695,331 $464,822 1308 1309 1310 1311 _ _ BUDGETED POSITIONS THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER - - - -- _- --- - -- 1 _ -- - - - - -- -- - -- - -- 1 _ _ _ - -_____ 8 + - _____ ____ -6 - -- 1312 ' 1313 THIS DIVISION'S BUDGET IS COMBINED WITH THE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003/2004 131a IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CHANGE OF ORDINANCE APPROVED IN JUNE 2003. T a 33 PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.873 MILLS -1.5 MILLS INCREASE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A- 8 C I D 1315 STREET MAINTENANCE 1316 —_ BUDGET COMMENTS 1317 1318 _ FN 2003 -2004 -- -- - -- — -- -- 13191 13zo ACCT. I — NO. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION — PROPOSED — - — 1321 13zz 1323 1324 1730 - 541 -1210 1730- 541 -1410 SALARIES - REGULAR OVERTIME _$192,925 _ 81900 _ _ _ — -- 1325 1326 1327 1328 1730 1730 -5� 1730- 541 =2310 - F.I.C.A. GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE ' 15,440 28,879 - -- - - - - ' - -- -.. -_ 1329 1330 1331 1332 1730 -541 -3150 1730- 541 -4080 iENGINEERING EMPLOYEE EDUCATION 36,000 - -- 1,000 - - -- - -- 1333 1334 1730- 541- 4455�LEASE PURCHASE - TRUCKS 6,87.8 - - - — _ 1335 - - -- - -_ - - 1336 13371: 1730- 541 -4625 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 55,000 133811730-641-4640 13391' 134o 1730- 541 -4650 MAINT & REP. STREETS& PAR_ _ ELECTRICITY 14 ,000 _ 87,00 CONCRETE STREET ALONG CITY STREETS SIGNS_ _ 1341 — _ C - 1342 1343 17.30- 541-46�MAINT. - -- 1730 &'REP GDS & STRUCT - - - - SUPPLIES_ 2,500 2,850 - — - - — 1344 1345 -541 -5210 - - 1346 1347 1730- 541 -52201 -5220 T -- UNIFORMS UNIFORMS 2,95.0 - -- - - , - - - -- 1348 1349 1730 - 541 — 500 - — 1350 1730 -541 -6430 OPERATING EQUIPMENT 10,000 — PAVEMENT MARKING EQPT 1351 1352 TOTAL $464,822 BILLY GOAT & SIGN INSTALLER 1353 _ _ _ — — — — 1354 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER,- CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C D I J 1435 FUND GENERAL _ 01' _ 1436 DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS 1 --&OT - 1437 DIVISION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 1438 FUNCTION OTHER GENERAL GOVT`SERVI 519 1439 CITY M1441_ ACTUAL ADOPTED DEPARTMENT'S MANAGER'S ACCT ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURES BUDGET REQUESTS RECOMMENDATIONS 14421 NO � 2001 -2002 2002 -2003 _ 2003-2004 2003 -2004 1443 - - - - - - - - 1444 1445 1210 SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS SALARIES WAGES - REGULA 167,265 $169,905 _ $157,519 - $15__4,965 1446 1410 _& O- VERTIME - - 3,475 6,000 -- 5,000 4,000 1447 - -- - 1448 TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES $170,740 $174,905 $162,519 $158,965 1449 f 12,433 12,161 1450 _ 2110 F. I C A. + 12,847 1 - 13,380 1451 2310 - GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 14,012 - - 17,255 - _ 1 _ 17,255 T -- 1 19,436 1452 1453 (TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE $197,599 $205,540 $192,207 $190,562 1454 f - 1455 f SERVICES & SUPPLIES 1456 _ 4080 EDUCATION _ -- 0 L $500 _ - - - $1,000 $500 1457 44551 LEASE PURCHASE TRUCKS 45,483 4 4.2,940 1 122,198 45,930 1458 46A P. &REP_ OPERATING EQ 1_ 376 1,000 1,000 500 1459 463Q MAINT & REP.- C_OMM. EQUIP. 460 { 1,300 t 1,000 1 500 1460 4680 1 MAINT & REP.- OUTSIDE SERVI 67,1.22 ; 60,000 � 75,000 j 65,000 1461 5220�UNIFORMS - - - 62301 FUEL * LUBRICANTS 3,225 124,350 1 4,165, + 140,000 4,165 ; 160,000 4,165 1 140,000 1462 1463 5240' PARTS - 47,706 63,000 61,500 55,000 5245' TOOLS -- 629 500 500 500 52501TIRES 19,478 { 25,000 - 23,500 20,000 R1469 62601' HEMICALS/SUPPLIES ' 7,781 9,000! 9,000 i 9,000 1470 TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES' TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE $316,610 r $514,209 $347,405 j-$552,945 $458,863 �' $651,070 $341,095 $531,657 1471 1472 - - -- - - CAPITAL OUTLAY � - � - -- 1473 -- 6420 OFFICE EQUIPMENT - - _ _$0 $0 $® 1474 64301 OPERATING EQUIPMENT 01 0 37,946 35,000 1475 -- -_ - TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY - -- 1476 1477 _ $Q -- $0 __ -- $37,946 $35,000 1478 1479 _ (TOTAL EXPENDITURES $514,209 $552,945 4 1 $689,016 , ______ 1480 BUDGETED POSITIONS };- + 51 4 4I 4 1481 -- _ aa82 'THIS PAGE IS PRINTED - - -- - - -- - - =h ON RECYCLED PAPER - - - - - - - - CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C 7T p I J 1483 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE BUDGET COMMENTS 1484 - - 1485 flY 2003 -2004 -' ( - -� - -- — -- -- -- - - -- - - -- 1486 ACCT - PROPOSED_ _- _ - 1487 ACCOUNT_ DESCRIPTION 1488 1489 NO. -- - �- - - - 1490 1760- 519 -1210 SALARIES -REGULAR $154,965 - - 1491 1492 1760-519-1410 ;.OVERTIME _ 4,000 - - 1493 1760 519 -2110 _ _ F11 C.A. __ 1494 1495 - 1496 1760- 519 -2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 19,436 - 1760- 519 -_4080 EDUCATION 500 -- - ANNUAL PAYMENTS 1498 1499 1500 1760 - 519 -4455 LEASE PURCHASE - TRUCKS 1 45,930 CRANE EXISTING EQPTS 18,611 1501 - - - - — -- - —, - TRASH TRUCK _- 13,852 lsoz 1FORD F150 -BM 6,580 1503 � - - - -- - 6,587 1504 1505 1760- 5194620 1760 - 519 -4630 MAINT & REP OPERAT EQUI ' MAINT & REP -COMM EQMT - - S00 - - - - - - - - 1507 1508 1506 1760- 6194680'MAINT -- & REP - OUTSIDE SER. �- - - 65,000 - - - - fi — - - 1510 -- - - - -- -- - -- - 1511 _ 1760- 519 -5220 !UNIFORMS ;. - 4,165 - I -- 1512 1513_1760-519-6_230_ J - _ _ - - 1514 PARTS 146,0001 - 1515 1760-519-5240 1516 1517 1518 1760- 519 -5245 1 (TIRES TOOLS j 500 -- - - - - - - - - 1519 1520 1760 - 519 -5250 - - I} 20,000 - IL_ 1521 1760 519 -5260 (CHEMICALS /SUPPLIES - 1522 -- 1760-519-6430 1523 EQUIPMENT OPERATING 35,000 FUEL MGMT SYSTEM 1524 : DIAGNOSTIC SCANNER 1525 TIRE MACHINE 1 lszs + - FIRE RATED CABINET -- - - - - -- 1527 1 sza $566,657 - - - - - 1529 1530 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 1 — - - - -- - CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A I B C D I J 1531 FUND GENERAL _ 01 1532 DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS 17 1533 DIVISION OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR 70 1534 FUNCTION OTHER GENERAL GOVT. SERV 519 1535 - CITY 1536 -F - - ACTUAL ADOPTED DEPARTMENT'S MANAGER'S 1537 ACCT: _ ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION _ EXPENDITURES BUDGET REQUESTS RECOMMENDATIONS 1536 NO 2001 -2002 2002 -2003 2003 -2004 2003 -2004 1539 tsao SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS 1210 SALARIES _& WAGES - REGULA _ $153,760, $160,522 $168,567 $16_4,552 q54 1410 OVERTIME 30� 800 500 500 1544 TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES $153,790 $161,322 $169,067 $165,052 1545 1546 2110 F. I C A 12,101 - 12,341 - 12,934 _ 12,626 1547 1548 2310 -- GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE - _ 11,003 13,092 13,032 14,812 - 15491 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE $176,894 $186,755 $195,033 $19.2,490 1550 - - - 1ss1 1552 SERVICES & SUPPLIES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES $470 $1,628 $1,628 $400 3450 4070 CONFERENCE_ 4 974 1553 TRAVEL& _ 11000 750 1554 4080 EDUCATION 0 474 500 250 1555 4630 MAINTENANCE & REP -COMM E 909 _ 720 750 _ 0 15561 5210 SUPPLIES 273 750 800 800 1557 ;5270 PERMITS __ 817 1 -; 720 750 _ 750 1556 _ 5410 _ MEMBERSHIPS & SUBS CRIPTI 178 260 _ _ _ 260 1559 1560 1561 TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES $2,651 $5,526 $5,688 $3,210 1562 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE '' $179,545 - - $192,281 - _$200,721 $195,700 - - -- 1563 - -- - -- 15641 - CAPITAL OUTLAY F - - - -- 1565 6420 OFFICE EQUIPMENT - -$0 -- $0 - -$0 - - - $0 1x66 6430IOPERATING EQUIPMENT 0 0, _- 750 350 1567 -- - - -- - - -- - -- - -- - - -- - - - - -- 1566 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY $0 $0 $750 $350 1569 -- - -- 1570 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $179,545 $192,281 $201,471 $196,050 1571 - -_____ -- - - --_e 1572 BUDGETED POSITIONS 3 3 3 3 1573 _ - - -- 1574 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET ao PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.873 MILLS -15 MILLS INCREASE .e ", , "'"t�`hm`fi:�' ,;3�w i r.'7:�..,.,. t�ti ;�`T.'. ?�'c""�"r .. -'Ti�. ,:�" W,Pi".,; r,;• ^a;°�.�, ,'=°i -�'.`, _,^i,:�" ^. CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C D I J 16o9 FUND GENERAL 01 1610 DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS 17 _ 1611 1612 DIVISION FUNCTION ENGNRNG,CONSTRCTN &STM ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTI 90 519 1613 CITY 1614 __ ACTUAL ADOPTED _ DEPARTMENT'S MANAGER'S 1615 ACCT ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURES BUDGET REQUESTS RECOMMENDATIONS_ 1616 1617 NOO 1 2001 -2002 2002 -2003 1 2003- 2004 ; 2003-2004 - 1618 SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS 16191 1210 SALARIES & WAGES - REGULA 221,035 127,730 150,369 123,677 1621 TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES - 221,035 - 127,730_ 150,369 123,677 - 1623 2110 F.11. C. A. 16,610 9,771 11,503 91461 1624 _2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 14,035 8,741 _ 13,654 9,963 1625 16261 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE $251,680 $146,242 $175,526 $143,101 1627 - -- - - -- lsza SE_R_VICES_& SUPPLIES _ + 1629 3100 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8,119 $20,000 _ $20,000 _ $10,000 1630 3150 ENGINEERING 800 0 0 0 1631 1632 &1638 1639 _ _3450 4070 4080 4410 4630 5210 5410 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TRAVEL & CONFERENCE EMPLOYEE - EDUCATION LEASE PURCHASE MAINTENANCE & REP -COMM E SUPPLIES MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES 67 1,842 1,802 0 1,856 _ 790 1,500 $16,776 ; 35,000 - 750 5,000 0 500 _ _ 1,912 - ' 1,000 $649162 60,000 _ 3,50 5,000 11500 600 4,500 - 1,500 $96,600 25,000 ;1,500 1,500 1,000 0 1,000 _ 1,000 - -- $41,000 1640 1641 1642 - TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE $268,456 $210,404_ __ $272,126 - $184,101 16431 CAPITAL OUTLAY - - -- ------ -_____ _ 1644 6420 EQUIPMENT OFFICE 0 1x45 6430 EQUIPMENT OPERATING _ -_ -0 _ 0 2,000 2,000 1646 1647 -- TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY -- - $0 - - $0 $7,000 $2,000 1648 -- -- - -- 16491 TOTAL EXPENDITURES , $268,456 $210,404 $279,126 $186,101 1650 - -- - 1x51 _ BUDGETED POSITIONS ` 4 2_ 3 - - 2 1652 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER I _ _ _ - - -- -- -- CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C I D I I J ENGNRNG,CONSTRCTN &STMWATR BUDGET COMMENTS r1653 FIY 2003 - 2004 ACCT. (ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PROPOSED 1658 1659 NO. - -� -- - 1660 1_7_90- 519 -1210 SALARIES -REGULAR $123,677 -�= -- CITY_ENGINEER & GIS_ — - - 1661 1662 1663 1790 -519 -2110 F.I.C.A. - 9,461— - - - — - -- -- - 1664 1665 1790 - 519 -2310 _ GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 9,963 1666 1790- 519 -3100 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10,00 1667 1668 i 1790 -519 -3450 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 25,000 - -- - - -- - - - 1669 167o 1671 1672 1790-619-4070 1790 - 519 -4080 TRAVEL &CONFERENCE ' EMPLOYEE - EDUCATION _ 1,500 1150_0 - 1673 _ ' 1674 1675 1676 1790 - 519 -4455 - 1790- 519 -4_630 LEASE PURCHASE - -- 'MAINTENANCE &' REP -COMM E 1,000 - 0 -- - - �- _ - - -- - - 1677 1678 1679 1790 - 519 -5210 SUPPLIES _ 1,000 - - - 1790 519 -5410 - ,MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPT( - - - -- -- - - H1680 1790 -519 -6420 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 -- - 1683 168411790-519-6430 OPERATING EQUIPMENT 2,000 MIAMI DADE AERIAL PHOTO - 16851 -- & UISMEDIA MAP VIEWS - - - - - - _ - -- 1686 1687 1686 _ TOTAL _ $186,101 - -__ - - - -- - - 1689 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET 43 PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.873 MILLS -1.5 MILLS INCREASE m.. , A B C D I J- 1690 FUND GENERAL " 01 1691 DEPARTMENT PUBLIC SAFETY 19 1692 DIVISION POLICE 10 1693 FUNCTION LAW ENFORCEMENT 521 1694 CITY 1695 _ ACTUAL _ ADOPTED DEPARTMENT'S MANAGER'S 1696 ACCT ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURES BUDGET REQUESTS RECOMMENDATIONS NS 1697 1698 1999 NO SALARIES & FRIN_GE BENEFITS 2001- 2002. 2002 -2003 2003 -2004 2003 -2004 1700 _ 1210 SALARIES & WAGES - REGULA $3,338,258 $3,427,101 $3,667,262 $3,274,258 not 1310 SALARIES & WAGES - PART TI 0 _ 0 _ 0 0 1702 1410 OVERTIME 315,400 250,000 250,000 - 250,000 1703 704 TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES $3,653,658 $3,677,101 _ $3,917,262 _ $3,524,258 1705 nos 1510 SPECIAL PAY- EDUCATION INC _ $26,072 $24,000 $24,000 1707 1520 OFF DUTY PAY 0 0 _$22,000 0 ____ 0' 1708 1530 HAZARD PAY _ 44,7_66 51,900 53,040 7os 2110 F. i. C. A. 290,828 287,105 _____60,320 305,968 275,499'. 710 1711 - 2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 227,892 275_,319 _ 277,370 _ 291,354 -- 1712 - TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE $4,243,215 $4,315A25 _ 4 582 920 - - - -- $ � � _ -- $4,1$8,151 - - 1714 SERVICES &SUPPLIES 1715 _ 3116 ANNUAL PHYSICALS & DRUG $1,906 $8,700 $11,600 $8,000 1716 - 3450 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES __ 44,641 65,790 82,011 - -- 77 894' 117 - 3490 CRIME PREVENTION PROGRA 5,400 5,000 _ - _ 11,363 - - - - - - - - -- _,8 - 0' 718 1719 _ 4070 4080 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE TRAINING & EDUCATION 4,892 16,684 ' 3,000 20,000 5,000 _ 22,800 _ 1,500 7,500 1720 _ 4440 LEASE PURCHASE - T_EL_EPHO 11,141 3,166 1 0 _ 0 1721 4450 LEASE PURCHASE- POLICE VE 241,602 _ 166,436 484,953 _ 180,893 1722 4620 MAINTENANCE &' REP.-EQUIP 10,145 7,500 _ 10,500 10,500 1723 4630 MAINT & REP -COMM EQUIP 64,016 40,464 72,975 32,100' 1724 4670 MAINTENANCE & REP.- STRUC' 0 0 _ 5,500 0 1725 4940 PRISONER DETENTION 0 0 0 0 1726 4960 SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS _. __ _ 0_____ 7,000 _ 5,000 5,000 1727 4970 APPLICANT TESTING 4,110 4,000 _ 9,750 _ 4,650 SUPPLIES _ _ 34,0 30,000 46,658 28,878 5220 __ UNIFORMS 46,287 65,00_0 112,419 - 75,571 5410 MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI 3,803 2,000 1,730 __ 1,730 R17345210 _ TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES $488,65 _ $428,056 - $8_82,259 $428,216 - 1735 1736 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE'' CAPITAL OUTLAY $4,731,866 $4,743,481 - $5,465,179 _._$4,596,367 _ 1737 - 6420 OFFICE EQUIPMENT _ 904 $0 $4,370 $1,580 1738 -6430 -- - - - OPERATING EQUIPMENT - - 811 19,438 481,613 - 32,112 1739 - - - - 1740 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY -- $1,715 $19,438 - $485,983 $33,692 1741 - -- - - - - - - 1742 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $4,733,681 - $4,762,919 -- $5,951,162 $4,630,059 1743 ...... naa BUDGETED POSITIONS 74 73� 61_ 1745 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 43 PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.873 MILLS -1.5 MILLS INCREASE m.. , CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A, B C p 1742 POLICE DEPARTMENT 1747 BUDGET COMMENTS 1748 FN 2003 -2004 1749 _ 1750 ACCT. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PROPOSED 1751 NO. _ 1752 - - -- - 1753 1910- 521 -1210 SALARIES -REGULAR $3,274,258 - 1754 - 1755 1910 -521 -1310 SALARIES -PART TIME 0 1756 -_ 175711910-521-1410 OVERTIME 250,00 _ — 1758 175911910-521-1510 SPECIAL PAY-EDUCATION INC 24,000 1760 -- - -- - - - -- 1761 1910 -521` -1520 EXTRA DUTY PAY 0 1762 - - - - - 1763 1910 - 521 -1530 HAZARD PAY 53,040 1764 1765 1910- 521 -2110 F.I.C.A. 275,499 1766 - t 1767 1910-521-2310 GROUP HEALTH' INSURANCE L 291,354 — 1768 - - - - - - - - - - 1769 1910 -521 -3116 ANNUAL PHYSICALS — 8,000 — 1770 - 1771 1910- 521 -3450 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 71,894 1773 1910 -521 -3490 CRIME PREVENTION PROGRA 0 1774 - - -- - -- 1775 1910 - 521 -4070 TRAVEL L& CONFERENCE 1,500 1772 - - - -- -- -- - - -- - -- - - = - -- - -- -- -- - -- - — — _ - -- - 1777 1910- 521-4080 TRAINING & EDUCATION 7,500 1779 - - -- 1779 1910 - 521 -4440 LEASE PURCHASE - TELEPHON 0 1780 - - - - - - -- - - - -- - -- - 1781 1910- 521 -4450 LEASE PURCHASE- POLICE VE 180,893 1792- - 1783 1910 - 5214620 MAINT & REPAIR EQUIPMENT 10,500 1784 - - - - - 178s THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER — -- - 1782 _ -- - - -- -- 1787 3LEASE TURN OVER TO THE NEXT PAGE FOR 'MORE POLICE 1788 DEPARTMENT - BUDGET COMMENTS — - - - - -- as PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.873 MILLS -1.5 MILLS INCREASE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A> B c I D 1789 _ POLICE DEPARTMENT 1790 BUDGET COMMENTS - CONTINUED 1791 F/Y 2003 -2004 - - -_ - - - _- 1792 1793 > ACCT. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PROPOSED - 17941 NO. - 1795 1798 1910 - 521 -4630 MAINT & REPAIR COMM EQMT $32,100 - -- 1797 1798 1799 1910 - 521 -4960 SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS 5,000 T 1800 1910- 521 -4970 _ EMPLOYEE TESTING 4,650- 18011: 1802 1910 - 521 -5210 SUPPLIES - — _ � - 1803 1804 1910 - 521 -5220 UNIFORMS 75,571 _ 18061910-621-6410 MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI 1,730 1807 EQUIPMENT- OFFICE _ - - -- 180811910-5,21-6420 1809 _ 1,580 - - 1810 1910- 521 -6430 32,112 EQUIPMENT- OPERATING - 1811 I -- 1812 TOTAL $4,630,059 - 1813 -- 1814 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER - - - -- CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET 47 PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.873 MILLS -1.5 MILLS INCREASE s.. TOY rl A I B C D J 1862 FUND GENERAL 01 1863 DEPARTMENT RECREATION 20 1864 DIVISION -- PARKS &'RECREATION ` XX 1865 FUNCTION RECREATION ACTIVITIES XXX 1866 CI_ T 1867 _ ACTUAL ADOPTED DEPARTMENT'S MANAGER'S 18681 ACCT ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION - EXPENDITURES BUDGET REQUESTS RECOMMENDATIONS IO 1869 NO 2001 -2002 - 2002 -2003 2003 - 2004. - - 2003 -2004 2003-2004_,_ 7870 1870 _- - - --- - -- 1871 SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS 1872 1210 SALARIES & WAGES - REGULA ? $743,413 _ $777,164 $776,335 $739,458 1873 '1310 SALARIES & WAGES - PART TI 0 30,000 _ 0 22,800 1874 1410 OVERTIME - 22,465 10,000 2,000 1875 -- - -- - -- 1876 ` TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES $765,878 $817,164 - $778,335 $762,258 1877 - - -- - - -- - -- 1878 2110 F,! I. C. A. ` 58,618 62,513 59,543 58,313 1879 2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 761795 1 98,455 86,191 106,172 1880 _ 1881 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE $901,291 $978,132 _ $924,069 $926,743 1882 - -- 1883 _ SERVICES & SUPPLIES _ _ - 1884 3130 TENNIS PRO $21,000 $17,735_ $0 $p 1885 - 3450 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES �- 78,662 68,000 55,080 _ 37,920 18861 4070 TRAVEL & CONFERENCE 1,000 - 1,000 - 1,000 1887 _ 4080 EDUCATION _ _ 726 1,000 0 - - p. 1888 4100 EQUIPMENTAL RENTAL'. 0 0 1,752 11752 1889 4120 TELEPHONE SERVICE 0 0 0 0 0 5,700 48,000 6,000 _ 5,700 48,000 5,000 1890 1861 4310 4320 UTILITIES-ELECTRICITY UTILITIES -WATER 1892 4350 ELECTRICITY (CITY PARKS _ 34,781 _ 45,000 _ 43,728 _ _ 1893 4420 OUTSIDE SERVICE RENTAL 4,120 4,000 4,000 _43,728 4,000 18941 1895 4455 4620 LEASE PURCHASE -TRUCKS MAINT & REP- OPERATING EQ 7,952 ____37,108 7,952 _- 45,000 12,000 38,555 5,500 35,005 1896 1897 4625 4630 LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS MAINT & REPAIRS -COMM EQP _ 45,128 1,230 45,000 _ 800 ' 0 1,180 _ p _ p 1898 _- 4670 MAINT & REP -PARK FACILITIE - 10,000 _ 10,000 - 10,0_00 _ _ 10,000 1899 4690 MAINT & REP.- TENNIS FACILIT 2,044 3,000 2,000 _ 2,000 1900 4820 FOURTH OF JULY FIREWORKS 0 0 3,600 3,960 1901 4820 FOURTH OF JULY FIREWORKS 17,735 10,000 0 1902 5210 SUPPLIES 1,981 _5,300 _ 6,50® - _ 6,500 1903 1904 1905 1906 5220 '5245 5410 5550 UNIFORMS TOOLS MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI SCHOOL `PROGRAMS 4,545 0 1,772 23,062 ..6,000 3,000 2,000 29,000' 2,000 0 2,600 23,900 - - _ -- 2,000 1,600 14,3 -0 1907 5610 BASEBALL - p -- -- p ® p 1908 _ 5620 SOFTBALL _ 0 0 - - -- ® - -- - -- 1909 1910 5621 5630 ADULT SOFTBALL LEAGUES FOOTBALL CHEERLEADERS DANCE /MODELING 0 16,398 780 75 0 _ 5,000 0 0 0 _ 7,672 1,000 p 0 _ _7,672 1,000 - -- p 1911 1612 - 5631 5635 1613 5640 BASKETBALL _ 0 _ 0 0 - -- - 0 1914 5641 ADULT BASKETBALL LEAGUE 0 0 0 0 1615 5650 SOCCER _ _ - 0 0 0 0 1916 _5660 .5670 5680 SPECIAL YOUTH PROGRAMS SUMMER CAMP SENIOR CITIZENS PROGRAM - -- - 28,377 - 1,488 15,899 24,000 - _51000 15,000 23,800 10,00,0 16,80,0 ___ 16,000 9,000 - 16,800 1917 1618 1919 19201 1921 1922 1926 TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE - _ - THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER - $356,987 $1,258,278 - - $352,787 - -- $1,330,919 $325,867 -- i - $1,249,936 - - - -- _ $278,437 $1,205,180 - - -- --------------- -- 47 PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.873 MILLS -1.5 MILLS INCREASE s.. TOY rl CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C D J 1924 FUND GENERAL 01 1925 DEPARTMENT RECREATION 20 - 1926 DIVISION PARKS & %RECREATION XX - - -- - - - -- - - - - - -- 1s27 FUNCTION _ RECREATION ACTIVITIES XXX _ 1926 _ _ _ _ CITY _ 1929 _ ACTUAL ADOPTED DEPARTMENT'S MANAGER'S_ 1930 1931 ACCT NO ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION _ EXPENDITURES 2001 -2002 BUDGET - 2002 -2003 REQUESTS 2003- 2004 ' RECOMMENDATIONS 2003 -2004' 1932 — — -- — 1933 CAPITAL OUTLAY - -- —,- -- 19341 6420 OFFICE EQUIPMENT $300 $0 _ $0 $0 1935 6430 OPERATING EQUIPMENT 8,981 0 15,450 15,450 1936 1937 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY - --$9,281 — $0 $15,450 - -- - $15,450_.. 1938 - - - - -- - -- 1939 TOTAL EXPENDITURES - $1,267,559 $1,330,919 $1,265,386 $1,220,630 1940 tsat 1942 BUDGETED POSITIONS _ 23 — _ 26 22 - 23' 1sa3 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET 49 PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MI'LLAGE RATE OF 7.873 MILLS -1.5 MILLS INCREASE 1944 FUND GENERAL 01 1945 DEPARTMENT RECREATION 20 1946 DIVISION PARKS &`RECREATION ' 00 1947 FUNCTION RECREATION ACTIVITIES 572 1948 CITY_ 1949 _ ACTUAL ADOPTED _ DEPARTMENT'S _ MANAGER'S 195o 1951 ACCT NO ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION �- EXPENDITURES 2001 -2002 ` BUDGET 2002 -2003 REQUESTS 2003 -2004; RECOMMENDATIONS 2003 -2004 1952 _ 1953 SALARIES &_FRINGE BENEFITS 1954 1955 1956 1210 1310 1410 SALARIES & WAGES - REGULA SALARIES & WAGES - PART TI OVERTIME $568,326 0 17,465 $602,077 30,000 5,000 $776,335 2,000 _ $__739,458 - 22,800 p 1957 - -- - lsse - TOTAL SALARIES &WAGES -- $585,791 - _$637,077 $778,335 $762,258 1959 -- -- -- - - - 1960 2110 F I. C. A. _ 44,841 48,736 _ 59,543 58,313 1961 _2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 54,531 76,191 -- 86,191 106,172 1962 - -- - - 1963 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE $685,163 - - - _ $762,004 $9241069 1964: 1965 1966 3100�PROFESSIONAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES SERVICES _ _ 0 - $0 - - - - $0 1967 1966 1969 1970 _ 3130 3450 4070 - 4350 TENNIS PRO_ _ CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TRAVEL & CONFERENCE ELECTRICITY CITY PARKS 21,000 43,662 17,735 33,000 _ -$0 0 51,480 _ 0 34,320 2,124 1,000 1,000 1 000 34,781 45,000 43,728 --' -- - 43,728 1971 1972 4420 4455 OUTSIDE SERVICE RENTAL LEASE PURCHASE - TRUCKS 4,120 0 _ 4,000 _ 0 4,000 _ 12,000 4 000 _ _ 5,500 1973 4620 {MAINT &'REP -PARK FACILITIE _ 37,108 - 45,000 _38,555 35,005 1978 1975 1976 1sn 1978 4630 _ 4690 4820 5210 5220 MAINT $ REP -COMM EQUIP MAINT &JREP: TENNIS FACILIT FOURTH OF JULY FIREWORKS SUPPLIES _ UNIFORMS _ 1,230 2,044 17,735 1,863 2,545 800 31000 10,000 2,000 _ 4,000 1,180 2,000 _ 0 2,000 2,000 0 2,000 0 2,000 1979 5410 MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI 1,772 2,000 2,600 1,600 1980 5550 SCHOOL' PROGRAMS 23,062 29,000 23,900 14,300 1981 5610 BASEBALL -- 0 - 0 p - 0 1982 5620 SOFTBALL -- 0 0 p - - -- 0 1983 5621 ADULT SOFTBALL LEAGUES _ 0 0 0 p 1984 5630 FOOTBALL 16,398 5,000 7,672 _ 7,672', 1995 5631 CHEERLEADERS 780 0 1,000 _ 1,000 1986 1987 5635 5640 DANCE /MODELING BASKETBALL 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1988 - 5641 ADULT BASKETBALL LEAGUE -- - 0 -- 0 0 p 1989 5650 SOCCER < - 0 0 p 0 1990 5660 SUMMER CAMP 28,377 24,000 _ 23,800 16,000 1991 5670 SPECIAL' RECREATION PROGR SENIOR CITIZENS PROGRAM 1,488 5,000 10,000 9,000 1992 _ 5680 15,899 - 15,000 16,800 1993 1994 $256,063 _ $245,535 $243,715 _ $195,925 TOTAL SERVICES &SUPPLIES 1995 1996 1997 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE - $941,226 $1,007,539 _ $1,167,784 $1,122,668 1998 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 49 PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MI'LLAGE RATE OF 7.873 MILLS -1.5 MILLS INCREASE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B'' C D 1999 FUND IGENERAL 01 2000 2oo1 2002 2003 DEPARTMENT I DIVISION FUNCTION RECREATION PARKS &'RECREATION ` RECREATION ACTIVITIES 00 572 - _ CITY -- - 2004 2005 ACCT ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION ACTUAL EXPENDITURES ADOPTED BUDGET DEPARTMENT'S REQUESTS MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATIONS 2006 2007 200a 2009 NO 6420 - CAPITAL OUTLAY OFFICE EQUIPMENT 2001- 2002 -� -2002 -2003 -' _ 2003 -2004 ' - i 2003 -2004 - -- - 2010 2011 6430 - OPERATING EQUIPMENT - - - - -- -$300 0 _$0 0 0 _ - - - -- -- 0 2012 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY $300 $0 $0 $0 2013 2014 2015 — — TOTAL EXPENDITURES — __$941,526 — $1,007,539 _ $1,167,784 - - - ..... _41,1 22,668 2016 2019 BUDGETED POSITIONS" _ 17 20 _ 22 23 2018 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER r CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET 51 PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.873 MILLS -1.5 MILLS INCREASE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET v i 3 s s i 53 PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.873 MILLS -1.5 MILLS INCREASE ..'�: °T -., .�. 4rz'- «`�t -.:, x i ,;. �i -"mt�, . i"'r} -H�°° i ..P,�' „�4`n':i` �, n ,'�'�` v 7�'�, . � ��� „ *;�'�TTy. -- i �," ;cam, �3"� .e � ,- ,'P'4P;•",`q.," j•� `��^ �.., �^'°3. ,e fi A i B C D 21o6 FUND GENERAL 01 _ 21o7 DEPARTMENT RECREATION 20 21o8 DIVISION ; MULTI- PURPOSE CENTER <20 21o9 FUNCTION OTHER GENERAL GOVT. SERV 519 2110 CITY 2111 ACTUAL ADOPTED DEPARTMENT'S MANAGER'S 2112 ACCT ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURES BUDGET REQUESTS RECOMMENDATIONS 2113 NO 2001 -2002' 2002 -2003 2003 -2004 2003 -2004 2114 — — -- 2115 SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS 2116 _ 1210 SALARIES & WAGES - REGULA ` $0 $0 $0 $0 2117 1410 OVERTIME _ — _0 0 '` 0 0 2118 — - - - -- 2119 _ TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES $0 $0 $0 $0 2120 _ -- 2121 2110 F. I. C. A. - p 1 - -- -- 0 — p - -- - -. 0 2122 2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 0 0 0 0 2123 — — 2124 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE ` $0 $0----,, $0 $0 — - - - - z126 u SERVICES &SUPPLIES 2127 3450 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES $0 $0 $3,600 _ _$3,600 2128 4100 EQUIPMENTAL RENTAL _ 1,752 21291 4120 TELEPHONE SERVICE — 5,700 5,700 2130 4310 UTILITIES- ELECTRICITY 0 0 48,000 48,000 2131 4320 UTILITIES -WATER 0 0 5,000 5,000 2132 4670 MAINT & REP -GRDS & STRUCT 0 0 10,000 _ 40,000 2133 4710 COPYMACHINE 0 0 _ 3,600 3,960' 2134 5210 SUPPLIES 0 0 4,500 4,500 — -- - - — 0 2135 5260 CHEMICALS /SUPPLIES _ 0 —0 t_ 6,000 _ 0 2136 5245 TOOLS 0 0 _ -- p _— -- - — p- 2137 2138 _ TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES $0 $0---- ; $88,152 $82,512 2139 -- - -- - -- - — 2140 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE $0 $0 $88,152 $82,512 2141 2142 CAPITAL OUTLAY 2143 `6430 OPERATING EQUIPMENT 0 $0 $15,450 $15,450 2144 _ 2145 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY $0 $0 $15,450 $15,450 2146 - 2147 - TOTAL EXPENDITURES —_ $0 $0 $103,602 $97,962 2148 __ .pe.e ________ 2149 BUDGETED POSITIONS 0 b 0 p 2150 - — - - 21st THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED -- - YCLED PAPER — — - -- - -- :T __ v i 3 s s i 53 PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.873 MILLS -1.5 MILLS INCREASE ..'�: °T -., .�. 4rz'- «`�t -.:, x i ,;. �i -"mt�, . i"'r} -H�°° i ..P,�' „�4`n':i` �, n ,'�'�` v 7�'�, . � ��� „ *;�'�TTy. -- i �," ;cam, �3"� .e � ,- ,'P'4P;•",`q.," j•� `��^ �.., �^'°3. ,e fi A i B C D 21o6 FUND GENERAL 01 _ 21o7 DEPARTMENT RECREATION 20 21o8 DIVISION ; MULTI- PURPOSE CENTER <20 21o9 FUNCTION OTHER GENERAL GOVT. SERV 519 2110 CITY 2111 ACTUAL ADOPTED DEPARTMENT'S MANAGER'S 2112 ACCT ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURES BUDGET REQUESTS RECOMMENDATIONS 2113 NO 2001 -2002' 2002 -2003 2003 -2004 2003 -2004 2114 — — -- 2115 SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS 2116 _ 1210 SALARIES & WAGES - REGULA ` $0 $0 $0 $0 2117 1410 OVERTIME _ — _0 0 '` 0 0 2118 — - - - -- 2119 _ TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES $0 $0 $0 $0 2120 _ -- 2121 2110 F. I. C. A. - p 1 - -- -- 0 — p - -- - -. 0 2122 2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 0 0 0 0 2123 — — 2124 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE ` $0 $0----,, $0 $0 — - - - - z126 u SERVICES &SUPPLIES 2127 3450 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES $0 $0 $3,600 _ _$3,600 2128 4100 EQUIPMENTAL RENTAL _ 1,752 21291 4120 TELEPHONE SERVICE — 5,700 5,700 2130 4310 UTILITIES- ELECTRICITY 0 0 48,000 48,000 2131 4320 UTILITIES -WATER 0 0 5,000 5,000 2132 4670 MAINT & REP -GRDS & STRUCT 0 0 10,000 _ 40,000 2133 4710 COPYMACHINE 0 0 _ 3,600 3,960' 2134 5210 SUPPLIES 0 0 4,500 4,500 — -- - - — 0 2135 5260 CHEMICALS /SUPPLIES _ 0 —0 t_ 6,000 _ 0 2136 5245 TOOLS 0 0 _ -- p _— -- - — p- 2137 2138 _ TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES $0 $0---- ; $88,152 $82,512 2139 -- - -- - -- - — 2140 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE $0 $0 $88,152 $82,512 2141 2142 CAPITAL OUTLAY 2143 `6430 OPERATING EQUIPMENT 0 $0 $15,450 $15,450 2144 _ 2145 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY $0 $0 $15,450 $15,450 2146 - 2147 - TOTAL EXPENDITURES —_ $0 $0 $103,602 $97,962 2148 __ .pe.e ________ 2149 BUDGETED POSITIONS 0 b 0 p 2150 - — - - 21st THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A' B C D I J 2152 RECREATION DEPARTMENT " 2153 z154 BUDGET COMMENTS F/Y 2003 -2004 -- - - - 2155 _ 21561 ACCT. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PROPOSED -- 21571 NO. -- - -- 2158 2159 2020- 519 =.1210 SALARIES -REGULAR $0 2160 - - -- - ---- -. - - - - -- 2161 2020- 519 =1410 SALARIES - OVERTIME 0 2162 _ -- - _ - 21631 2020 -519 -2110 F._I.C.A. j 0 _ 2164 216512020-519-2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 0 2166 -- - -- - -- - -- -- - - -- - -- -- _ _ 2167 2020- 519 -3450 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,600 2168 - - -- -- -- -- - - - - - -- 2169 2020- 519 =4100 EQUIPMENTAL RENTAL 1,752 2170 - -- - _ - - -- - - -- - -. 2171 2020- 519 -4120 TELEPHONE SERVICE 5,700 21721 2173 1 2020 - 519 -4310 - -- UTILITIES - ELECTRICITY ` - -- 48,000 - -- -- -- -- -- - - -- - -- -- - - - -- - -- - 2174 1 1 i I I I -- 2175 2176 2020 - 5194320 UTILITIES -WATER - - 5,000 2177 2178 2020 - 519 -4670 MAINT & REP -GRDS & STRCTR 10,000 - -- - -- - - -- 2179 2020 - 519 -4710 COPY MACHINE 2180 2020 - 519 -5210 SUPPLIES - - 4,500 -- -- - - - - - - - -- - rlU4 2020- 519 -6430 OPERATING EQUIPMENT 15,450 -- - _ TOTAL _ 97,962 2187 - z186 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A B C D I J 2169 FUND GENERAL 01 2190 2191 DEPARTMENT DIVISION RECREATION LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 20 50 _ 2192 FUNCTION OTHER GENERAL GOVT. SERV 519 2193 _ CiITY 2193 2195 ACCT ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION ACTUAL_ _ EXPENDITURES _ADOPTED BUDGET DEPARTMENT'S REQUESTS MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATIONS 2196 NO 2001 -2002< 2002 -2003 2003 -2004 2003 -2004 2197 - -- - - zlse SALARIES &FRINGE BENEFITS _ 21991 1210 SALARIES & WAGES - REGULA $166,714 $175,087 $0 - $0 22001 1410 OVERTIME 19,062 5,000 0 p 22011 _ _ - - -- -__ 2202 2203 TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES $185,776 _ $180,087 $0 $0 2204 2110 F.1. C. A. 14,113 13,777 ;_ 0 2205 2207 22091 __ I2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE_ TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE SERVICES & SUPPLIES _ 19,635 $219,524 _- 22,264 $216,128 0 $0 0 $0 2210 3450 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES $36,300 $35,000 ' $0 $p 2211 4080 EDUCATION 726 _ 1,000 0 _ p 2212 _ 4455 LEASE PURCHASE - TRUCKS 12,309 7,952 0 0 2213 4625 LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS 45,128 _ 45,000 0 0 2214 4670 MAINT & REP -GRDS & STRUCT 4,946 10,000 0 0 2215 _ 4680 MAINT & REP- OUTSIDE SERVI 0 0 0 0 2216 5210 SUPPLIES _ 118 3,300 0 0 2217 5220 UNIFORMS 2,124 2,000 0 _ _ 0 2218 5245 TOOLS - - 0 _ 3,000 _ 0 -- -- -0 2219 2220 TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES '_ $101,651 $107,252 $0 $0_ 2221 - _ 22221 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE -- - -- $321,176____'_____$323,380 - - - $0 2223 - - - -$0 -- ---- -- - - -- 2224 CAPITAL OUTLAY - - - - - -- - -- - 2225 2226 64301 OPERATING EQUIPMENT -- 8,981 - - 0 - $0 - -- $0 - -- - - -- - - -- - -- 2227 - TOTAL CAPITAL', OUTLAY $8,981 -- - $0 - -- $0 - $0 - 2228 -- - - -- -- - - - - - -- 22291 TOTAL EXPENDITURES - - $330,156 $323,380 = $0 -- $0 2230 - - -- 2231 _ BUDGETED POSITIONS - -- -- 6 6 0 p 2232 - - 2233 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PRO, POSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET 56 PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.873 MILLS -1.5 MILLS INCREASE A B C D J 2234 FUND GENERAL 01I 2235 DEPARTMENT NON - DEPARTMENTAL EXPEN 21 2236 DIVISION NON- DEPARTMENTAL EXPEN 0 2237 FUNCTION OTHER GENERAL GOVT SERV 5191 2238 _ _ CITY 2239 ACTUAL _ ADOPTED DEPARTMENT'S MANAGER'S 2240 ACCT ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURES BUDGET REQUESTS RECOMMENDATIONS 2241 NO � 2001 -2002 2002.2003 - 2003 - 2004 2003 -2004 2242 - - -- - -- - - - -- -- 2243 SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFITS 2244 1210 SALARIES & WAGES - REGULA $40- ,889 $40,125 $0 $p 2245 2246 TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES $40,889 $40,125 $0 2247 _ - 2248 2110 FI.C.A. $3,117 $3,070 $0 $0 2249 2210 PENSION PLAN CONTRIBUTIO 267,188 250,000 620,000 _ _ 640,000 2250 _2220 DEFERRED COMPENSATION C _ 46,064 _ _ 42,520 ' 42,04 4.2,040 2310 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 3,006 _ 4,588 ' 0 _ p- R22551 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE: $360,264 _ _ �40,3 - - - $662,040 - $682,040 SERVICES & SUPPLIES -_ 2256 _ 3160 PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL $0 $0 _ _ $0 $0 2257 _ 3210 AUDITOR'S FEE _ 0 _ _ _ 0 _ _ _ 55,000 5.5,000 2256 3450 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES -_ 0 0 _ 0 0 2259 4070 TRAVEL `& CONFERENCE 0 0 0 p 2260 4080 EMPLOYEE EDUCATION 0 0 0 p 2261 2262 4120 4425 COMMUNICATIONS- TELE_PHO LEASE PURCHASE- POLICE 8J 0 _58,817 _ _ 69,000 _ 78,000 _ _ _ 78,000 - 0 -- 0 25,000 25,000 2263 4430 LEASE PURCHASE- PRINTER - ___ 0 - _ U _ __ 0 2264 4440 LEASE PURCHASE- TELEPHON _ 14,354_ _15,000 _ _0 0� p 2265 2266 4445 4630 LEASE PURCHASE -AS 400 MAINTENANCE & REP -COMM E 0 10,900 0 3,500 0 11,500 0 1 2267 4632 MAINTENANCE & REP - INTERN _ 0� 0 _0 11,500 0 2268 4633 MAINTNCE- COMPUTER NETW _ - _ 0 _ _ p _ �_ p 2269 4635 MAINT P. C. EQUIPMENT _ 0 0 _ - - - 0 2270 `4720 PRINTING & PHOTOCOPYING '> 0 _ 0 0 1 7,500 2271 2272 4850 5210 ADVERTISING - NON LEGAL SUPPLIES 0 463 _ 0 1,500 _ 500 _ 0 - 500 2273 5550 AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM 0 0 0 0 2274 5590 LONG RANGE PLANNING 0 0 0 2275 2276 8310 9210 SEED FUNDS CONTRIBUTION TO INS. FUND` 43,8_26 ` 10,000 0 10,000 _ 0 25,000 _ _ __ p 25,00__0_ 2277 - :9230 CONTRIBUTN TO S MARTIN TR 0 - - -- 0 0 2278 9240 CONTRIBUTION TO CRA TRUS - 0 0 -- -® - -- -- -- - 30,227 - 2279 9910 CONTRIBUTION- SPECIAL EVE 71,807 76,400 65_,000 -- - - -- --- - - - 5_0,_0_0_0 22ao 9915 CONTRIBUTION -RED SUNSET 209000 18,000 _ 0 p 2281 9920 GENERAL CONTINGENCY 51,348 639573 100,000 100,000 2282 9925 FUCHS PRK GRANT MATCHNG 0 0 0 0 2283 _ 9930 64TH AVE PARK LOAN REPAY 24,925 0 0 _ p 2284 2285 2286 9935 9950 COMP NETWORK LOAN REPA RESERVE FOR REENCUMBRA - 0 15,07 0 10,000 _ p 5,000 _ _ p= 51000_ - 2287 2288 TOTAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES_ __$321,515 $266,973 _ $365,000 - $387,727 - .. 2289 - TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE ` $681,779 $6079276 $1,027,04 $1,069,767 2290 ', 1 -- 22sa THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 56 PROPOSED BUDGET WITH MILLAGE RATE OF 7.873 MILLS -1.5 MILLS INCREASE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2003 -04 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A I I B:; C D I J 2292 FUND GENERAL 01 2293 DEPARTMENT _ NON - DEPARTMENTAL EXPEN 21 2294 DIVISION NON- DEPARTMENTAL EXPEN 00 2295 FUNCTION OTHER GENERAL GOVT SERV 619 zzss — — — -- -- — .CITY — - -- 2297 ACTUAL ADOPTED DEPARTMENT'S MANAGER'S 2298 2299 2300 2301 ACCT NO ! ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION - CAPITAL OUTLAY EXPENDITURES 2001 -2002 BUDGET 2002 -2003 REQUESTS 2003 - 2004 `` - RECOMMENDATIONS 2003 -2004 - - - -- - 23021 23031 z3oa 23051 6420 6430 6435 OFFICE EQUIPMENT OPERATING EQUIPMENT 1 ACQUISTN OF PARKNG METE — $1,914 799 0 $0 0 0 _ $0 0 _ 0 $0 0 0 2306 — $2,713 1 $0 $0 - $0 2307 23081 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $684,492 $607,276 $1,027,040 $1,069,767 2309 __ - -e 2310 BUDGETED POSITIONS - 1.0 1.0 1.5 - 0.0 2311 - - -- - - -- -- - -- - - - -- - - � 2312 THIS PAGE IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER so u r CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI South Miami Ali-AmerleaCity Inter - office Memorandum t r INCORPORATED 1927 0 R -V 'AD) 2001 TO: Honorable Mayor, Vice Mayor DATE: July 29, 2003 & City Commission t FROM: 'Maria V. Davis IS- AGENDA ITEM No. 9. City Manager PIZ ( RE: Authorizing the City Manager to execute agreement with the lowest responsible bidder for the Proposed Downtown Improvements — Phase 2 RESOLUTION: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT WITH PETRO HYDRO, INC. FOR DOWNTOWN' IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II CONSTRUCTION AT AN AMOUNT OF $635,654.00 TO BE CHARGED TO US DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION GRANT, SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT GRANT, US HUD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE GRANT AND THE US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY STATE TRIBAL ASSISTANCE GRANT ACCOUNT NUMBERS 001- 0000 - 132 - 2062, 001- 0000 - 132 -2060, 001- 0000 -132 -2063, 001- 0000 -132 -2061; PROVIDING' FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE BACKGROUND & ANALYSISa The proposed Downtown Improvements Phase 2 is the second phase of the Downtown Infrastructure Improvement Master Plan. The construction project will consist of the drainage improvements, water main extension, fire hydrants installation, wider sidewalk, street furniture, roadway rehabilitation, lighting, landscaping and pavement marking.: The project was advertised in the Miami Daily Business Review four consecutive times (June 16, 23, 30, 2003 & 'July 7, 2003), as required by one of the funding agencies. Four contractors submitted sealed bids for the project. The bids were publicly opened the last day of bid submittal (Wednesday, July 16, 2003) at 3:05pm. Since the bid opening; the engineer of record has tabulated the bids, reviewed and evaluated all bids, verified references, verified bid bond and discussed the project with the lowest responsible bidder (Petro Hydro, Inc.) to make sure the scope of work is clearly understood as designed and specified. The Engineer of Record (C3TS) has submitted the attached letter of recommendation for Petro Hydro, Inc. :lei ,.`�. ,-.. �4 sf�� --mss'. �„z.n����'.5:1€.,r..✓«'.y .,. .�'$:%`" �, �"^, i :'Gz .^, f�v� i"�R"m�*fi. �, *w?;s.. ``�'..i"�' Page 2 of 2 Comm. Mtg. Agenda; July 22, 2003 This project will be funded 'through grants from U.S - Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administrative (EDA), U. S. Department of HUD FY 2001 Economic Development Initiative (EDI), South Florida Water Management District and US EPA; State Tribal Assistance Grant. The Public Works Department's grants account management sheets, per submitted requisitions are attached. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Commission approve the funding for the work. ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Resolution Bid Opening Report Tabulated Bids Li Certified Advertised Notice of Bid Invitation ❑ Engineer of Record's letter of recommendation • Letter from Petro Hydro, Inc. dated July 21, 2003 • Map of Project Area • Project's Budget & Funding Source fund balance 1 2 RESOLUTION NO. 3 4 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH 6 MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE 7 AGREEMENT WITH PETRO HYDRO, INC. FOR DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENTS — PHASE 11 8 CONSTRUCTION AT AN AMOUNT OF $635,654.00 TO BE CHARGED TO US DEPARTMENT 9 OF COMMERCE, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION GRANT, SOUTH 10 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT GRANT, US HUD ECONOMIC 11 DEVELOPMENT `INITIATIVE GRANT AND THE US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 12 AGENCY STATE TRIBAL ASSISTANCE GRANT ACCOUNT 'NUMBERS 001- 0000 - 132 -2062, 13 001 - 0000 - 132 72060, 001 -0000 -132 -2063, 001- 0000 - 132 - 2061; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE 14 DATE 15 16 17 WHEREAS, the Mayor and City commission wishes to provide drainage improvements, 18 water main extension, fire hydrant, wider sidewalk, roadway rehabilitation, street furniture, lighting, 19 landscaping and pavement marking within the downtown area (SW 73rd Street from SW 57th Court to 20 SW 58th Court and SW 58th Ave. from Sunset Drive to SW 73rd Street and; 21 22 23 WHEREAS, this improvement is part of the Downtown Infrastructure Improvement Master 24 Plan, and; 25 26 WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission authorize the City Manager to execute a 27 construction contract with Petro Hydro, Inc. for the Downtown' Drainage Improvements' — Phase II for 28 an amount of $635,654.00. 29 30 31 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT 'RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISION OF THE 32 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: 33 34 35 Section 1: The city received six bids in response to the Notice of Bid Invitation 36 advertised in the Miami Daily Business Review on June 16, 23 and 30 2003 and July'7, 2003. 37 38 39 Section 2: The engineering consultant reviewed the bids and recommended` that the 40 contract be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder: Petro Hydro, Inc. 41 42 43 Section 3: The project will be - funded through grants' from U.S Department of 44 Commerce, Economic Development Administrative (EDA), South Florida Water Management District 45 grant, U. S. Department of HUD FY 2001 Economic Development Intiative,' (EDI) and the US 46 Environmental Protection Agency's State Tribal ` Assistance Grant (STAG), account numbers 001- 47 0000- 132 -2062, 001- 0000 - 132 -2060, 001- 0000 -132- 2063, 001 - 0000 - 132 -2061. 48 49 50 Section 4: That the Mayor and City Commission authorize the City Manager to execute 51 an agreement with Petro Hydro, Inc. for the construction of Downtown Improvements — Phase II for an 52 amount of $635,654.00. 53 54 Section 5: This resolution shall be effective immediately. 55 56 PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2003. 57 58 APPROVED: ATTEST: 59 60 61 Ronetta Taylor, City Clerk Horace G. Feliu, Mayor 62 63 64 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: Commission Vote: 65 Mayor Feliu: 66 Vice Mayor Russell: 67 Commissioner Bethel: 68 CITY ATTORNEY Commissioner Wiscombe: 69 Commissioner McCrea: ... ,..- - � �St[, ?Yf�4 S'PrlJ� sFC� t •: t s� r�� s? i! BID OPENING REPORT Bids were opened nn- Wednesday July 16 2003 at 3 OSnm For. Downtown Improvements — Phase 2 Pre -Bid Estimate: $685,000.00 CONTRACTORS: BID AMOUNTS: 1. Petro Hydro, Inc 2. Marks Brothers, Inc. 3. T.J. Pavement Corp. / 10 4. Williams Paving Co. ® 6 0 THE ABOVE BID AMOUNTS HAVE NOT BEEN CHECKED. THE BID TOTALS ARE SUBJECT TO CORRECTION AFTER THE BIDS RAVE BEEN COMPLETELY REVIEWED. Owl City Clerk's Sign: e Witness: WitnesY t i E '.� W J 01 N A. M 33 m v -g m c0 m m ga 1p mim vv J cif m m vo ?. M v W M v N m v 50. O n• G7mm0-�aO... '�O II� CN O, N.mm'm w:DG1 N.W N.�yn�. co a@ O. room :ate CS Wmom�- - *N mm m.�SWWa`. mxxDDm �;�n pwmxm 3, I > c .:om'S > p -7D O. � w�m]y�cG,Om w I CL OQ ° m —m�Ovm 3 .° —'aim ; -nom C mm �' °, mNm m..v SSm y 3 3. D mWm w a o .• m.0 ..003 m z 3 X00 _: m0 3— ... w. m00a Cf O O O f' O y O w.m I "Qm. m 111 .O.• aC-�� w? iI°G O O L 7 E :..'o on % m m m• W m m �: < m31Dom�pfOm a.� = m 3 3 v 3.omxm w S m x. 3 R' ° nn. :nmymmmmcaw wo-J1m oW= rc w;..Im m:m m..oa mWy °G °+a romovco m =o:O gym' ^y. W' ao :c;�=5S N O m £; .mr a O Q .p'. A O (no..,a �.p w 1"` � O o•:m'rD°...ac°G ti m.w',N m .°o•ID -1 E 0. .y.0 m mm a o o am c 3 m� a' 3 3.0 , ?05 a a o y 5 I a : 0 asm w 9. m m m N N O w vm no m m v 0 xl. T G? m °i CD N W a O, v. y m CL a� c.- :: °m,�'m - 0 a0, .. v =c wy y ao my5 m �° �•� mom rQm m - m' ? — S• 0• o a �.. m m v e — j o ,. m m c._ 'N m. ? CL N V NW IV CA A O V N N co V al W CD O J C 0... J (n r N mcn co N.. m ''�. �... r o �r rr mN' r p D m 1: D ii TI p p m ;C p in m D .G n -n p 0 v� rfl F» E» W N FA Hi yi �y !fl J OI vi Ey N N 0f N EA 4A W : O T to D 00. O 00 °.. fNll 0° A' W o 0. 00 O o : O C NN 01 0 00 0 O 00 0 C 0 O 0 G (n. m C o o oo o- O Z z a 0 V 41 cN0 ',.. fA O fH ffl O co V' Hi ffl W di ifl Yi O. EA N N O 0 _fJ11 0 00D O O ': O N O ["4 N O O 0 O O m: N N N O O C m g0 O O 0 0.... g 00 O 0g 0 0 0 Z N C 2 V V fA fo O EA N O O: t�0 E9 O O O N H! - EA to O Ci 0 20 (n (T':: O 0 0 NN 01 N O O O: 0: 0 :. O 0 O O O O A O -40 M O O O 0 0 00 O A 00 00 cn O O A O: O O O m 2 a a 'o N yi A O O O (A: V: f9 N ifl 'W EA W W fR fA N N w (11 Hi EA N J tT 0' EA N 6v A 4A A C Z W (n O 'oo A + N W W V v,.. O. O O a..0 c0 W J c0 O o m O O o` O :. O O o'0 V Sl1 O O W O 0 0 0o O' O 0 0 co o A 0 0 oc 0) V in O W N co W O O C Z f». c to o '. O 0) N 0 m w 0 9 O O 0 O fA J fJ O H3 V O O N (T : 0. 10 {y A N 0 N P O O O O'. 0 ': O O o 0 O N 0 'O A O V O m 0 N O O O. 0 0 O 0 20 N Hi 0 A 0 N:' 00 fH W O O b9 '. O O O 0 O O o L m m 3 fA N 40P Oi W fA 69 N O O O: O N ,,pp .P O N 10 - 0 01 O tT O O O O ODD A w V p c0 O) J O EA 01 : O O O! fo U1 O O O H! OD 0 N !r fA V W O N O &i �• O V O 0 0 O V m t0 0 N V1 N W O i Vtl 0 O Z -I C Z 'O O V fA V O 0 O, O N V 9 V tT A' 01 N V1 : m d 0-4 O �I !n 6. 0 (n 0 0 00 00 m .P : Oi ry 0 N ? N T A fH fA fA N fA fA fA EA fA 0� y T J W ":,4 3 G1 A W t0 N C 2 W O 00 !n J OG 0 O O 00 J (T 6> N 0- 0 O O o J O o O N Vt 0 m (n 01. OD 0. O' G' 00 -4 N V O O O 0 00 m. 01 A. O O': 00 00 A N 0l 0 O O 0 '. N N O o •••I C z N A 1 N� 40 V 9 A V 4 fA 01 A O SA W '. T N � A V W O fA c0 p m. ! Cf J' W W t Vt W p O p O A 0 — m 'm O 20 P, N N O 0 O '!V En IO N : 0 0 O O w 0 w 0 M 0 0 IU 0 cn O). 0 0 W O i0 m :. (11 O 3 D1 V m N f�.1 W - Off W 4A EA Hf 50 [A to ffl yi W W 0t. O A N A J iD �' N A N W N v O C co m W A V O 1 �. : N V Na T W W W- T (3) V O A A Z O 0 A 0 0 N 0'. '.0 C 0 J !n 10 __. W V N 0 :.0 O O N O G G 00 O IV :O AT O 0 0 0 O 1O IV (t N JO C-) rn w n ,_� � C4 (A O N• °w Z..p oN* D ED �L C m 'Z 3 C N V, N ID to voo IMIu 00 -v' 133 o �ovicn O.mm o —I axoop »vmm aNm'y mm. Ip W �p al. m� �� c� way 3 m' N cm O. C Q O'. W m ^' < 7 1O 7 y �. N..:N m m N N o N n: m O O.D N N. OBI' _ m C " m m CD o mO 2 ° <ma3 �m;m�o co 9. C :.'. m N O o N.. O ° N W ° N W N r r r Ir m m m m m 0 E9 6% EA E9 (fl y (Oi100 �o O O o 0 a.N ooQ 00 p -� ;mC Ooo o0 0 0: °O °o 0 0 O 'O: Z z w EH T2 ifl yi m D 0 m N . v J 0 p A O 0 O N gob �o 0 o 0 zrmn 0 000 S0 c z N N W N N: 9. Vi M o' o o ,'o o °O , °o 0 0 m m 000 °O0 0 0 °o o 'o.. S a s EA O 7 O amom�C�0 m m 3 L)_"n[ m -6,M n�N m N 3" 0 2 0 0 V m m o = o y p N C 0. c�nNA �A A1= O o O= O . . 0. ? N W Vt O O :. O m M 3 3= O O o �: m 91 cc N d O I N x m,`G — m7 ID p`N o dpi ma° vy 0 1 N It N C rt I D rtNII D D D :n .ONO 00 O O O O m 00 o 0 O O 0 0 00 0 j, G 00 y 000 En N u E EA W O O O O O 0 O O0 0 0 0 °o °o c ° N p- 0 N co 0 N OO 00 N Ep , °O,AO 0O N O1 0 O Ep IV. p 0 p df Cn w W O O E9 N 'o 0 0 0 463 N O 0 0 [N fD G A O O O O O O m 0 O 0 EA En (n O O {p N N 00 OO 00 y) t11 0) ',.. pal 00 N EN EA � W O OG C. W O O'O I_ O o I: 'P m N °I fWOO 00 EA EA P101.. 0 T E9 ON N t16011 n O 0.0 �i O) IV GO fr O EA SO W EA EA o °o 0 O O W N ro ON O. 0 0 O v 4. O fA' On EA W to EA : W Vi A' O C voo IMIu 00 -v' 133 o �ovicn O.mm o —I axoop »vmm aNm'y mm. Ip W �p al. m� �� c� way 3 m' N cm O. C Q O'. W m ^' < 7 1O 7 y �. N..:N m m N N o N n: m O O.D N N. OBI' _ m C " m m CD o mO 2 ° <ma3 �m;m�o co 9. C :.'. m N O o N.. O ° N W ° N W N r r r Ir m m m m m 0 E9 6% EA E9 (fl y (Oi100 �o O O o 0 a.N ooQ 00 p -� ;mC Ooo o0 0 0: °O °o 0 0 O 'O: Z z w EH T2 ifl yi m D 0 m N . v J 0 p A O 0 O N gob �o 0 o 0 zrmn 0 000 S0 c z N N W N N: 9. Vi M o' o o ,'o o °O , °o 0 0 m m 000 °O0 0 0 °o o 'o.. S a s EA 3 V V N N C c�nNA �A O O z Vt O O :. O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I O Z 1 .ONO 00 O O O O m 00 O 0 O;' O..' y 000 N EN EA � W N O C OBI A 2.A T O 0.0 O O O O °O o °o 00 °o °o C O O O O :.0 D O Z N 1 d EA 49 V fA W EAO O (A m 'A P N W O I,W O T O m x O 0 0 ZA coo co O � A O 1 O � D m N 00 0 N O O � f0 V "C (1pV t0 � O Nei Ey. Z p 0 0 0 O O :O W: O� C Z -i � N W W — O J A � m m. ' O En O O O O :.0 D O N d V (A 'A P N W O O T O C O ZA O � A O 1 VO O V m A m W W N KK m m cc CI O 7 _' w cpT K m •T7 CO 0 "i m G O -n T T m m 33 `3 3 �;r 3mKmmf,� m0'"yOav� 3 O vi ''o m e m,:�• a �' a 3 QO(A 'm W GD R° Sze P. y 0 F137.8 n N °pay Om w N O 3 00 N N N a O $ o O O 0 3 3 m 0. m 0 u,m m m m= �. C ° ° °o•m m, MI N N N W (rrC m. ® m'- Oi O m r: a�>C D r ?t r T Z P W i ;a o O 0 m LD,7 m m �j m N D 3 m z m m Ih o M m W N 0) O x- m OI � N m y O O N fJil 0 O o m rya C O O 3 Q G y fA w W J M OD A m u .. O O ' �V O O O O 0 0 0 > W O O D E9 0 (T O D D D D D D R Z1 V OI , Nip a. r p ..OHO '•!WT 0 OO O O ' 0 M 0 y 0 IV 00 0 o o n OO..O 0..0 00 O O O S y �L ° ?3 m (� 3 cwUI O O N V W O p {A C, 1 :. fA y ffl � .4 0 b O 00 N �' d o 0 00 W 0 0 O- O 0 -. 0 0 00 O 0 4A w V 0 M 0 c�D :. O f�O 0 fA fT O EA N 4 A O O O O N O N O N m'.. mrr rm � � W m A r .c.pa w O T w m N to DTI .n W O 40 W "'.: N .p O N O 00.. m N 00 O - •O�i ,ONO W W O J fNT� Vt Vl I� N '71 m N °° °o o o OAi A O°O' A O A -4 m _ o - . , C rf w 0.0 m 1A71: 0 A 0.0" 0 N fA &> v M W p OD N OD W O O ,GWO tAT W m A m W m N m KK m m cc °c�NN O 7 cpT K m mm cp m m O rn �CD m y 0� m o:.a ,°•� y 3 m m fo. A m 3mKmmf,� m y Er vi ''o m e m,:�• a �' a 3 QO(A 'm NA A Am o 0 F137.8 m 6,3 3 G Om N O 3 00 CD a CL $ o Q N m m O CL ° m 0. m 0 �. r. CD o �. C c ?m m, O N N N W (rrC m. ® O Oi O m r: r m IM D r ?t r T Z P W i ;a o O 0 W O O PT Ica O O O O N D w in 0. 0 " w p O p., O N M W °_�, OI � O O O O O VNt 0 fJil 0 O 0 ': 0 O ifi fA NO W J O O O O 0 O O 0 O O ' �V O O O O 0 0 0 0 W O O Ni O O E9 0 (T O 69 IV O D fft OD m O yi A O O R Z1 V OI , Nip a. r p ..OHO '•!WT 0 OO O O N O V O'' 3 KKK KK °c�NN cpT K m mm cp rn �CD � QO(A 'm NA A Am W fn 31 'pw N O 3 00 0 3. a $ o 0 o m w CD �. C ?m m, O m W (rrC m. ® -• ¢ m r: Cml m Z P W i m y mm p CD M °_�, °n 02 �. oa= �QN' obi J O o. o m. - 3 o: La o N z _ D ° , £ a. Cl) W y n V S y �L ° ?3 m (� 3 3 W O p 0 N W N N m'.. mrr rm m m D DTI .n D D D Vl I� N '71 m o°o °° °o o o •°°o 0 ; m _ o , C 2 N V A V v p: J O N N tNT� O O O N N O tT C 0 O O -4 �. C Z 1 '9 °o °o o 0 °o °o m O ,, w O m O 0 00 , O''. ,p 0 m .. 2 ° en n 'o 0 C O V O Z ° 0 O N 0: N O O.' O 0 000' 00 0, O C Z 4fl 49 0 N :0 °O b+' 0 GO o p p p m F O , 000.00 O' O � G 3 � O OO VpiO'; tWDO 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C Z 1 V M 0 O 0 O co O'. O 0 W O N W G � O O OOAiO ;gym 0: ? O 0 0 0 O O O O Z 1 m 0 -- 0 0 [Aid '. (ATE 0 m -0-0 .D t . N Fn t» er? C OA1 O O '.O O Oi O O fNn 0- 0 O- 0tnm 4 SA * , °w Z R p O U) to cn 0 7 o o � 3 rr O O C m 3 m 3 N S N N r rrrrrrr W =80 O D m N N..0 C C C C C C 7 Ar_nmomo 3 ..:m o o mm °•� �.o D A J Q. -M. w m.� W D c S. N N N N N. m S. c� o m"� ^• d� m A y 8ow30 1 w< tea' �. OR 0:3 c0 = xQm 1 N II m , , °yd aom3.'o ^mmm Xo'om N y Sm 0 m.o;m0 0 dm.9 m O y n; �q.owoo O A onm o m M oa,rna'v'w... a N W r rAC9rnmmm+ w A N < U) O V � E. A m J �• N .0 f9 N &i N U.. W' M-4 '0 m'.o: V M m n. w.o o v, o ° °0oo00O0bb !r o O to '.n 1 m °o m' c N o o c y m W �. .cow. y m • a o' Obi o W °nn c -4 ° =m is O —.rrrr W rrrr r'rr A in in in in (ommin 0tnm 4 SA * , °w Z R p O U) to cn 0 7 o o � 3 rr O O C m 3 m 3 N S N N r rrrrrrr W =80 O W OD m N N..0 C C C C C C 7 Ar_nmomo 3 ..:m o o mm °•� �.o J Q. -M. w m.� W D c S. N N N N N. N T N c w S. c� o m"� ^• d� _v, A y 8ow30 w< tea' �. OR 0:3 c0 = xQm nm N II 3 , °yd aom3.'o ^mmm Xo'om y Sm QOym,m m.o;m0 0 dm.9 m y n; �q.owoo O A onm o M oa,rna'v'w... a N W r rAC9rnmmm+ w 7 N < U) V � E. A J �• N .0 f9 0 N m &i N U.. W' M-4 '0 m'.o: V M m n. w.o o v, o ° °0oo00O0bb !r o cn cn to '.n 1 m °o m' c N o o c y m C 2 �. .cow. y m • a o' Obi o JOJ O0fnoC °nn c -4 ° =m is O —.rrrr W rrrr r'rr in in in in (ommin b) win C Wyl fo f� � �� w O. 00- 4n fn�fLL utW Wv N W 69 fR ' 0 o 0 0 0 i' N N# m w OO O u O A O m N b °o°o,o woo 00,o,b v o 'oo 'o°ob Cob° y� ° °o 00 a o 00 rD o u> yi � A O W C '60 �.:. co 00 y(�n W J C W .. tn' O O 000.0000. 0000000'. ,0 0 0 p o PC PP 0 C o p 00 0 0 0 o 0 0 ° �' O fA fA 4.. A O O m 19 0 v S9 CO A W A J M 0 0000000. O O 0 0 O O O; S 0 0 00 C 0 O O 0000 C 0 O O O O O O O 00 00 0 0 O o. 0 b 0 0 bb O O bb O O C O 00 O O a O N. - O (fin fA V W � � oo O C Z O O O 0 0 0 Ut 000 C O 00 'O O 000 O O.O.O 0 0 0 0 O 000 0 0 0 0 O O 0.0 O'0 0 0 O O 0 0 O. O 000 0 0 0 0 0 O '00 O 00 Z ca 169 fOo � fA P - ON N -N+ W W [nrnm ONT 0 Obi N �01 O O W O 0000000 O b O 0 N O W C 0 poop 0 0 O 0000 O O p 0 pp o ° °°°° 0 000 °o o °O0 0 iff y m O fR � o.6 FA fA fA EA fA p O AO.W 6 0' yy y10N 6 0 0 0 0 pppp O O OOpp 0000 0 O O 0000 to 9 0000 000 W �0 A Vl o V :OO OfrN� N o000 W m d w M m O N O' N EA Fp t11 O W W -4 fo COO W tr to to IV O 00 ea fo_ ? O V O W O (11 O.O : J V fn (n00 O W W W O N O G 0 0 O 0 0 0 O O. O O: C O O O O O O C 0 0 N W r W J V ONON {}�4ANO p N fn O O OG�OnD 0101 U1N 0 O 00 00 p O 00 00 ,1Jn (Jn00 O O 0 N O 0 0 O$ o 4EO ;0 y�fyN N N W A p N O O pp O P. 0 PIP N Co 0000 0'000 0 0 0 .o O WOO 9 : fro f» N ro O N O N - fA to N N N_tNT N W �A W O 8 COO 0000 0000 V1 0.0 0 0 MOOS fn N 0 0 VI 0 0'00. 0 0 0 0 0tnm 4 SA * , °w Z R p O U) to cn 0 7 o o � 3 rr O O C m 3 m 3 N S N N r rrrrrrr W =80 W J m N N..0 C C C C C C R. Q. -M. P. P. P. R. A. c S. N N N N N. O . air y 8ow30 w< �. 0:3 c0 = xQm m N II 3 , C'000 o �' m M oa,rna'v'w... m W r rAC9rnmmm+ U) A J f9 fA fA &i N PC W' M-4 V V M m o o v, o ° °0oo00O0bb !r o cn cn to '.n 1 °o m' C 2 y a Obi o JOJ O0fnoC °nn c -4 ° =m is O W U C Z w 69 fR ' ffl 0 i' N N# m w OO O u O A O m N O woo p O O 000 ' G i y� a o rD o N � A O W C v _ Z O o (011000000' 1 O O 000.0000. 0000000'. C rZ o 59 69 A O W JNOWD OWD OO, PPM L o• o M 0 0000000. 0 0 0 0 0 w < m 3 a O N. - O (fin fA V W di J1D fA W tOOGD O C Z O O O N W O 01. Nom? O O Or O O 1 O o O - 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C Z {y fA 69 W fA N rn -rn fA m pro N -N+ W W [nrnm ONT 0 Obi O O W O 0000000 O O b O o y W O � D m W iff y o.6 o p W O 6 0' 0 0 6 0 0 0 fo to 9 O+�iNO W �0 A Vl o V :OO OfrN� N o000 W m d w M m G D a fo f» v ea fo_ ? f� fo�W 0 C 0 p s . cn O1 tOJOW W N ow..:J�11w� N W V W O. Z C O O V1 00.010000_ IV N O O W 0tnm 4 SA * , °w Z R p O U) to cn 0 7 o o � 3 rr O O C m 3 m 3 N S N N TR liA1927ATm, MIAMI DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW },$ p Rt�;>* Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays i I 01 AT- 10K Miami, Miami -Dade County, Florida STATE OF FLORIDA 1�'a ' xTM IMN0■'�I ®3dS77 COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADE: "-.1 EWA�NlAEST SNIT . -7 23 Before the undersigned authority personally appeared sealed ',proposals until 3:00 P.M. O.V. FERBEYRE, who on oath says that he or she is the fool tlrne Wadnesoays July 16th; 2003 SUPERVISOR, at the City Clerk's office, South SUPERVISOR, Legal Notices of the Miami Daily Business Mi ri�lCotyHa11;6i0 "Sstnset 17rlve, South Mlami, Florida 33143, for the Review f /k/a Miami Review, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday folawlrtg protect and Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami in Miami -Dade . .... IN IMOR16 EMENTS PHASE 2 W County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, 7 rd awe# (frem 5W 58 :�st. to SW 57th Cf;} & $Vii Seth Avenue being a Legal Advertisement of Notice in the matter oftt (fro3m SW 73rd'St. t ®SW72nd St.) Tlie protect +cpnslss cfi the reeoristruction of portions of SW 73rd Street rid :;L5gth Avenue, all Within the downtown area of the City o6 South .. Y 3"h .. CITY OF SOUTH .MIAMI BID NO. GI 03-0716 Nfiamt��Protecti?lementsinc�lude drainage, water main, sidewalks, paving, EDA INVESTMENT NO. 04 -79 -55023 jatjd ping olectrlCa1d lYrigatloti grad street furniture. The project includes a perto i Offinci consxritc ion activity, from October "I8; 2003 to February 29, in the XXXX Court, 2 t34andconstrttcsorehrhu tcommeri inAugusf2003, was ublished in said newspaper in the issues of 4 p i portlnp tot this rolt?ci wail! be. federallyl assisted through the U.S. 06/16/2003 06/23/2003 06/30/2003 07/07/2003 Dpaftmentafmrrterce, Eeonornic Development Administration, and other #edera`I ageneles� and assuch bidders must comply With Presidential "Execu#iye rder 124 sand df FR Part 60-4 1ha Davis Bacon Act, as Affiant further says that the said Miami Daily Business suppteented�b 2CFF Part S .the Copeland ('Anti-Kick Back) Act; the Review is a newspaper published at Miami in said Miami -Dade Confect yUor Hoursn Safety Standards Act as supplemented by 29 County, Florida and that the said newspaper has Carj5ansfallflthapphcablefederal stateand local ordinances. e; c,fi heretofore been continuously published in said Miami -Dade County, , Attentin is cared +to lhefactthat no less than the minimumsalaries and Florida, each day (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) uyages as north 161'116 Contract Documents maybe paid on this project and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post amrtta4 tYtatrctt?r must:ensiire3hat empioy%es and applicants for office in Miami in said Miami -Dade County, Florida, fora ernp!oymartt ar n'o} discnmI ted °againstsbecause of race color, religion, period of one year next, preceding the first publication of thexf�rr;sircti�atonl ; attached copy of advertisement; and affianf further says that he or ' will be'openeoi pub11 '1 't orsh6rtlyafter3 b P M: an Wednesday, she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation Jul 16th #20D3 at the South Miami City Hall City Commission Chambers, any discount, rebate, coin or refund for the purpose (0 Sunset Driv,and South Miami, Florida 35943. i of securing t adverti ent for ublication in the said newspaper. Bfe ocuments i#tay be,pbtainad on or after Monday, June 16th, 2003 front Solatki ul amt Gtfy Halt Ctty Clerk's office Ebb' Sunset Drive, South Mlaaml Florida 33143 A$100 00 non refurtdabBe deposik per set of plans and s}reifcatlonslis required Sworn t and subs d before me s1e bidtil ±tae awarded #o the lowest responsible responsive bidder. If, tfo ev e t tt?IanageTda" n' s it to be`in thebe t interest of the City of utt'fit Mit,ttt2 +Cltrf Soci#h Miami reserves the right to.reject any 07 ay of J Y D 319ititdsA tc ivatuey jnformaNtes or minor defects tri apy`btds, and, to increase br iecf�ase th6 quanti ties shown to the Bid Form. IBias wfiIII �contatrr irregularities of any kind; may be rejected as i anfogmal ! (SEAL) ?non�nnndatory pre bid.conference will be held at South Miami City O.V. FERBEYRE per Ily ki.. Hail; Ctty'Cohptfisstari Chamber;'613ti Sunset Drive; South Miami, Florida I�;tA 33 P513 'at 1 C90 M; local'11 a on Wednastla July 2nd, zoo. All NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA int��ested conical tors are invited ifr attend. MM154,10 N NO, CC 912958 ffOi EP. JUNE 2004 Tta Ctty"f South &Miama l u Opportunity Employer and encourages theiscppan ofettified Black fv1BE coniractora The following participation goals appty9t ct all cortstrucbon ;work on this project; 39:50% minority, and 6.9 N4# maleforeachtrade' . Ronetta Taylor, CIVIC a City Clerk 6f1fi 23v 0 7/I 03-B-02/372338M- L July 21, 2003 City of South Miami . ; . • Public Works Department • • 4795 SW 75th Avenue South Miami, FL 33155 Engineers Architects P I a n n e r s Attention: W. Ajibola Balogun Public Works Director Reference: City of South Miami Downtown Improvements — Phase 11 C3TS Project No. 1929- 015 -0013 Dear Mr. Balogun: We have checked the bids submitted for the above- mentioned project. The bid from the low - bidder, Petro Hydro, Inc., was reviewed and we find no discrepancies. The 'bid was EB0005022 accompanied by proper bid security, and we checked references for performance on AAC0021 a2 completed and current projects with other clients. We also spoke with Mr. Orlando Garcia, President of Petro Hydro, Inc. regarding his bid and its completeness. He has confirmed his confidence in his bid amount (see attached letter dated July 21, 2003). Based on our findings, it is our opinion that this General Contractor is qualified and capable of performing the work. Therefore, we recommend that the project be awarded to the lowest responsible responsive bidder, Petro Hydro, Inc., in the amount of $635, 654. The award is subject to acceptance by the City Council, execution of the Contract Agreement, submittal by the General Contractor of the required Performance and Payment Bonds, and Certificate of Insurance. Sincerely, Corzo Castella Carballo Thompson Salman P.A. Dan Grandal, P.E. Associate X:11929 15_SoMiami CBD11929_15_13 Downtown Improvements Phase - Bidding \DocumentslRecommendation of Award.doc 901 Ponce cle Leon Blvd., Suite 900 Coral Gables, Florida 33134 305.445.2900 1.800.448.0227 Facsimile 305.445.3366 Web Site: www.c3ts.com Equal Opportunity Employer PETRO HYDROI INC Engineering Contractor, Environmental Engineering & General Contractors. G.C. License #: CG- 0061799 • GE'Licensm,.## E21160 July 21, 2403 City of South Miami 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, Ft. 33143 Attu: Mr. Sean Compel Dear W. Compolt Please be advised. that Petro Hydro, Inc. is confident in our prices given to the City of South Miami regarding 131D Cl 03 -0716. Furthermore, Petro Hydro, Inc. is confident on the completion time stated in the bid documents. If you should have any other questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at (3 05) 477 - 0878, f Sincere f Orlando Garcia, 3r. President 10446 N.W. 31st Terrace /'Miami,; FL 33172 / Phone: 305- 477 -0878 / Fax: 305 -594 -8982 / E -mail: Igarcia @petrohydro,com > Oa 1000 z.on0 BID DOCUMENTATION CHECKLIST PROJECT: 5m% N rte 1 V 4xlga ImPl'oya nen As •PhWS6 Z PROJECT NO.: (qz — D(5 -00ll BID DATE: 7h A 10.3 OWNER: C_ la A SAGYf'1 1 am BIDDER: 9�efoy RvJc0,1,1r, Required with Bid Proposal: Bid Bond or Bid Deposit: Notarize Required Amount $ (S %) Bid Proposal: l blanks fit Arithmetic Check Discrepancy: Addenda Acknowledgement: No List of Subcontractors: rovid Not Provided Not Applicable Bidder's Questionnaire (General Information Required):' omple � Missing Info. Previous Projects Experience References Attached (..For any references called, attach sheet with reference name, to ephone number, company, and any comments or remarks made) Florida Contractor's License Type and Number ne(Gi� = ��� i'it 1n ' ' : _I�( ?I V Copy attached Current Confirmation Cv,�pa�y •• �bs� -$ Dade County Certificate of Competency EZ j t Lo Copy attached Current Confirmation Other Licenses (Occupational, etc.) Copy attached Current Confirmation Solicitation and Acceptance of Gift Form (Florida Statute 112.313) Drug Free Workplace Program Trench Safety Act Compliance Notarized CDBG or other requirement(s) FDEP Met Not Met Confirmation NA01314_Medley \01314_015 Wastewater Facilities \0006 -Const Adm & SSES Rept\Bids \C3TS Bid Documentation Checklist.doc REFERENCES: l: Reference: Contact Person Listed: Riplar- Phone Number: Fax Number: Owce : 375- Z�gO Address: Job Description: - Prmirct Questions:' a) Did Contractor complete work? No b) Was the work considered satisfactory? e No c) Was the work completed on schedule? Ye No d) Go ents: e o ilk do' rthe wee or rvm ed, ke � ar w� � ;� b si c6 st �vq am ad sW 41 a eoral way was ®c J Ole, 't `A4 ir avo.,61a �4PA +0 2. Reference: D �iowit* misi00A Contact Person Listed: Fa6on �rYnr;A61 — Phone Number: 3PS- Ih - 45Sq Fax Number: Address: Job Description: Questions: a) Did Contractor complete work? Yes No b) Was the work considered satisfactory? Yes No c) Was the work completed on schedule? Yes No d) Comments: INa,- ts s lore F�M 11 4 .4- is a d0 9 y»' t 1zb 7kPai G1rt ve P W-g . 3. Reference: n[sPupiG w0ek, Contact Person Listed: A44nsO Ndrit Phone Number: 305-40Q - $ 224 Fax Number: Address: Job Description: PrAerl+ Noap( Questions: a) Did Contractor complete work? Yes No b) Was the work considered satisfactory? Yes No c) Was the work completed on schedule? Yes No d) Comments: We r-k &A in rgu Zss . hk A�ad g a� {? s j; N \01314_Medley \01314_015 Wastewater Facilities \0006 -Const Adra & SSES Rept\Bids \C3TS Contractor Refernce Verification Checklist.doc i c� G Q 4' c 0 U®- I- V Cn O 0 Z W O O N N W 0000000000000000000 000000 0000p ooLnLr�0000 6 CMMC706 6 6 666 6 6 01-NCO 0 q CO 00 M CO M LO[tN0 U) CO O CO 0001- 00 N M "t � r S)0CA ti ti ti O O) LO I-• M d) O O CO d" LO 00 o LO I- r 00 00 00 000001t 0 d) d) O d) ItN d) 00 OOM CO w I` NOOOUf)NNN I- I` 0 LO It 't 't v LIJ 1 Q 613 HT H? 69 1 64 Ei 60- Efl EA to 1 613 to 6c, 6G, Ef e 6s a. m �, 00000 00000 00000 00000 000000 OOOLOO LO 0 Z tiOOMO N 10 0 LO 0 O;OO 0 0 r r d) LO oOmodto 0 0 0 O N LO : 0 cq Q 0MI-U')O Cl fl- I*- M� 000oNOM N Q 6vi-:�td 0 N N CA d7 C6 Cq C6 Co I.NOC6eC\f N O CO N M - z 0 0 a �- Co C LO 'd "- 00 �,� MOM stCO �,d'r0 NNd•LO LL O �-Orf d d �Ctd p�r00 ��d LO LO 0000 0,LOLO0 4L IN r' NNNNNN N'NN N MMMMMM 0000 0000 °O °N ° 0N OOO '00 O 0 0000000 0 °O o N N N N CO 'CO N `` N N N co N d N co N° co M N 00 v r r N LO "D LO ti w_! M 0 t0 M N - � S NO O;O Od 3: It 3: ` a v -L a N LL z co O o V U ° ° Q ° 0 0 C C N C CD N V N N ca N N %=j U U U U) a N V U 0 ZO � � Co Q c o E a. _ 'L o od o: C2 Q c O Z H N C N C 'N C 1 0 Q o U o' U C O,OCn N O E O ~ J 0, m•a•aQ >W 0) N ._ N (D t�- Q. 'v wa W �c N N J mrno q o v, w _ > > o W ai w U- Ncn�cnC- dcn -iM N O C. cn a 'SUUYC� O,O .E'C7MM� YUUU� t- UOUcnU + Cn O 0 Z W O O N N W � w ? 0� co 0 _ M ' D'F— ZU Z -j dam' N i- 0LnMI-rn r Ln 11.0 Ln 0 W N r r CO co w 0 CIO 0 0 LO A Cfl r4 c,44 a l 0 0 Z W 7 O N M N W y O ti 1- O O O C) 0 ol 0 0 O 0 O r.. 0 Ln LO 0 00 0 00 0 In O 00 6 h I-� f� I-� P-� ti ti t-� N r-� O 'T O'IT 1(') 0 to Ln 0 0 0 0 In O. r r 0 LU O 04 CO 'It q Ln Lp Ln C0 co 0 (fl CO Cfl Cfl CC) to W Z M N r r Q El3EflEF?63EflFf? Cf3�EREflEH Ef?Efl a m c'MOI- O C* Lf') r O O .- N 00,0 to U-) LO d m 04 W cq C3� r 00 It CIDm 0 OS 0Z 0 lcq O 1- ti O O O 17 CO Ln L? oCID U')I- ti o'er rn 'IT 0 O - r O O N CO r J O LO CO M N r r W D Q Qm E9 t& CF? Efi 1-a co O !- O O co LO N 2 c-N000 0 0 M V� a~O�NC oD ti Q a N }^i O O i.i. LU O ai a_00LO G N N M N O M 0 d Lo u-, M CO 0 F- N Z N co C1 C) Q 0 i r � w ? 0� co 0 _ M ' D'F— ZU Z -j dam' N i- 0LnMI-rn r Ln 11.0 Ln 0 W N r r CO co w 0 CIO 0 0 LO A Cfl r4 c,44 a l 0 0 Z W 7 O N M N W y i 0 z W 0 0 N M N W 10 L111111111 Hill 11111111111 ^=..- °,'. vu;;, k' ?F^'.,,' s",..:, F',° Tt�i „",e`''.,�,s,+a�;'16i:"s'A,'”, O 0 Z W O N N N N N N N N N N N N co 1 O � Lp Ln Ln lf') Ln Ln LC) t() Lntn lf') O 00-00 00 CO 00 00 00 CO W 00' 00 CO N N N N N N N N N N N N V V � 00 to 0U') to U') 0 m 0 W LO U Ltd O W d d d d d d d d d i 0 �EF}ffl4fl �}fAlf}�ERE/ -}Ef3 ERA °z z °- 0- O 0 N N W ~ f- 7 LU M N N d Z H � � (N IL 0 J Q Q Q y LO ,uj O N 0 O ti W O 00 W 00 L Q Q m t� � �. ''�/^� V+ Q Z D Qv M as a LU W Cl) a 0 o., co � o N O 0 Z W z Z N co 1 - V O Q O i °z z °- 0- O N W f- 7 N H � � i J Q y ,uj 0 W C 0 U) ( n 4 o, a) iii O p. U) W v Z 0 o_ 'N D 8cn0 Im 00 C o<� a o m� O -e i 0/ J N 'W N N 00 0 o v o 0 v v gv 00 00A 0 0 0 C) 0 i i i i i i i i (b. � V O T W N i 00 V CA Ol ? W N i C) 0 .0 pC 0 cD (5 S C n O O Ca O C O ° D N Q O p d = 10 O o 2: d 0 . CD ro w 0 y N• � p 7w s 0 0 cD m m n 0 X o� D N 'O y CO < 3 n - 00 :3 CD 3° 0 0 CD °:-' 0 (D a O CL Q CC CD N ( 3 _ w „ (D D " CD N S C D O D -0 0 3 - -. N t— Q 3 CL 0 0 D w 0 0 N p c . n O cn 7 n w O 0 (D X v1 O < 0 -n - f? O 0 CD O w S N 3 5 03 0 - :3 (D -- (D � - D 0 ( i (D CD n O m s CD w QW 0 Vi ( M cn 0 ' aQ «NO M0 CO L D L C myM w� ,w o w w %a c S w o w d w o O W d 7 CQ O 0 w w f] 3 . CD y N ( n , CL p w 7 -p S w Q Q. Q p w N w ( N (D d O N -0 CO n N ° « CD C� - 3 _ = CL ai C, G CL a a p CD :3 w (D O 7 M O � " - 7 O n C, . 0 r w a N Q a a t C Oa N 3 0 1 W - CD (D a O y C O O ( Al (D " r ` CD p w O < n C N w CD N O O. v O a co N N 00 O i ONe D i UWoN cn O 0 m m� m rr m9) r cn r- > m n n � Cl) CO 7n :-m cn 0 w -69 .619-CO N 91 cn O cn o O N :-4 0 O 0 O O N CD 0 "o o o o � mC o ° O O o Z - a°°C00 A 4o -0 1 69 fo (n V W d 49 D 0 W n. O Cl V 00 OC, N W 0 Q W O O O W O O CA 00 00 U N O m Ul O O O � Z R ' O 0 O 0 ° ° 0° °° 0 0 ° O 0 Z N N W N N m . -(W V 49 Ol p 169 N (JC O O 49 O 49 O O OD O (n O N Cn fA 4N R "0 OD O 0 n O (O �I N O O O �O O O O O RO 00 O V O O O 0 0 Ol O O O O 0 O 0 O O O A O O O O O O O p . n , w l 3 N 0 10 fo C ,69 ) ? V N V ? Z P -O • 0 w O CO (o Ol O o V UC 00 O O OD O7 o (n O.P. 0 0) i O W OD O -i t OO O,O V 0 V O O O O p OO p V O O Ol O O O 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O O O O C Z 49 49 J � {6 T69 0 N 0 0 O O 0 w 0 O H3 v v O O O 4A A 49 W .69 O m L , O O N O O O 0 O a O O O 0 O O O O (p 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O M w 3I a fD PF 49 N 4 co TO ()I 49 4A H3 W 49 (fl ? (!? 4A 4f3 09 4A i O N N N Ul P CO CA OD l) i O CA V Ol O O7 Z O P CO O O W V CA V O O O O O N CO W M O --4: 00 O m O CO N N N -+ O O O -• Ol O CSt O O O (n N O O O O O 1c, Cn Cn O O O 0 O 0 O O O O O "' O O O O O O O O O co O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O O O O O 0 10 ' C Z (09 ={ 1 i N N 0 M N (O {fl i (fl i V 49 (fl V i O 6% CP W N (n -4 N V fO 4R 49 N N 0 w O O (n rn O o °. Cn .A '.. m (n m M -+ O O O V O Ol 0 O O 0 0 cn 0 O O O 10.0 O O 1010 O O al O P O O O N 00 0 a nF m N � N -69 40 4H N dfl (fr 4H (fl N O N OD CO (O O P co "(O CTl CON N V i P CO C Ql W OD Ol W'. O O C0 V O> V O i V 0 O -40 A c l OD N (n V V O W W O IV N Z -i V O U N 10:�; OD O O O O O N + Ot m cn 0 0 (n 0 0 Cn 00 00 00 1016 m 0 0 O O 0 O O O O O O O O O lo O O' C _Z i N N N 4R V M cc 1613� V P 4fl C, (fl OD V OD O {A O CO i -4 4n 4R 49 i m C V co C n � w O O O O N O O O V (n O O (n CO (n O O O O N m O 0) O OD O O Cn Ol o: 3 (n 460 4 N N N, C N U O N (O N N N (O (n V 00 V CO n O (O W to O OD -.' V OD O i :-4 N i O CO i 0 V Ol W O v O Z A p N O V OD A 07 N 0) 0) W Ole O O n l n V O O O CTO O O O O O O O O O O C 0 U) ( n 4 o, a) iii O p. U) W v Z 0 o_ 'N D 8cn0 Im 00 C o<� a o m� O -e i 0/ J N 'W N N I j i r i j ,r�^`- *�'��- "'^"•' „r: 3`<�*�..m^ °�r'�; ,`�'Sk�""�°-�� ,'�°t�,,,rsrs4;m�5�„es .�;r, .r�t�`.. � _ � -, -�., :. ,.�. `.:.sf :',�,%f"`„ `�C, �; .�. ,. .Z"2:R"�m?F :.'”' .. .'",�`�a. � ,srg..'„"i'°''���,..., '`.v�, a�- ,�t'�. ,.�E" 'S� N O00 vv 0` 0 N N N 69 D C p qt p Ca Nj O vOCNTi A W N i O O Cl) J -D W O N (D 0 C) n O O si V. m N 7 N ro LU N 3 - O � N O N" 0 3 < _ 2 O -. C) `G -a O w O O x < < a n W 0 (D' N • O °I 't CD Al o 0 3 Sv O n 3 p_ 3 - Cgym o �-•v, ° CD - 3' (D 0.. N �_ '� O C• =o � o�-v �, m � m Q 3• -. _ _ m °— �:... 0 S o m o w -- < w� 0 Z QO O (D (Ck 3 (D 3 (D N (D 0 3 Co N < O •< 3. ¢1 _ -a "0 0) iu fl O -* N N �. a 3 (D o -, 3 C5 O "0 (D (p O o cQ ? (D w (COD = (D O) N fn °.cOi� _*'0 O O mw'svomrn 0-+ m 00W�o� �� 0 N N a QIR Cc* '@m N +OD �• o go N pni (� y, v, °_' O y a CD (D c�i s ¢; fl w :p < co N N 5-0 N O (D 3 d7 N G7 < n Ut = CD W O X Al 3 ¢� `O (_ D) 3 a _0 3 O CD CL C N O a =' CL .p -. _ ^O" D 9 B N O O CD a- 3 co = y. 3 m 3 3 '" 3 o j a '(D c M cn M O Al O (p p" ?< i N •G — N O. tD 3 N 3 C) 3 7 3 C 3 N Q. 3 Q cn -y". C O N cD (D 3 3 N O d 0 r 0 NN `G W D N N< 3 a n (D '� C Q 0 (D (D O "" 3 a1 1 C 1 0 O (fl (D O 0 CD CD a, N, O0" CD (a co ai O' O c < : a �.. 3 (D CD � �.,. CD p D'. Cr, -c �, (D,.,+., O Q 3 O 0 CD CD 0- CD O rt O o - 3 a y �, Q c m A) 3 a 7 O Q CL N , 0o 'G � N N EA p Opp N . N ffl OD O N W j0 N W O p O O Ul o O ip O O 00 0 • N, m D r m m m rn P' m rn' Im D D-n -Ti -n C» �n D D D m D O O D D 6% « <0 0 -60N C)� M m (D O C4, 1 C 9 fO N <O ! N 0 0 69 (n v N U 00 0~O O O tT( 0 0 p Yb p 0 O- N l O p al 0 O O O 0 p p p o N O 0 O O °p O 0 O 0 O O 0 O 0N 0 m C O 00 y� Z O O O O 0 N 61) lea co N j W N W �D <NJt O Co _p p O OD 00 d0 'N -4 V O co O j W O CC) 0 �% O O O 0 f O O 0 0 CN77 0 Q O O O Z N O o 0 o O 0 0 0 00 0 I00 O O po O I j i r i j ,r�^`- *�'��- "'^"•' „r: 3`<�*�..m^ °�r'�; ,`�'Sk�""�°-�� ,'�°t�,,,rsrs4;m�5�„es .�;r, .r�t�`.. � _ � -, -�., :. ,.�. `.:.sf :',�,%f"`„ `�C, �; .�. ,. .Z"2:R"�m?F :.'”' .. .'",�`�a. � ,srg..'„"i'°''���,..., '`.v�, a�- ,�t'�. ,.�E" 'S� N N N N 69 C 0- Ocoo 0 O' O O OS O O O p O O 0 0 0 N N 0 N N N N +OD N W N IV <fl co coo 00 O O p rlo O °0 0 0 ` oo O O O .46 O O O: O O M N .60 1 0 O 0 0 p p 00 Oc" po 00 p °oo 0 N 0o � N N EA p Opp w ffl co O 0 O O o O R O O 00 0 10 O O O 6% « <0 0 -60N M m (D O (D 1 C p O 0 0 W p o- 0 00 0~O O- N y� C71 O O O O 0 N N (fin (J( O 00 O O cn V CC) OWO O O p N O O 9) �I 0' O o 0 0 0 po 0 .a W 4 {R lo C) p OWD O N � CNn O 00 100 0 m 0 C 'Z O W W p -I v O QD -4 p 9) O N 00 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 <fl I j i r i j ,r�^`- *�'��- "'^"•' „r: 3`<�*�..m^ °�r'�; ,`�'Sk�""�°-�� ,'�°t�,,,rsrs4;m�5�„es .�;r, .r�t�`.. � _ � -, -�., :. ,.�. `.:.sf :',�,%f"`„ `�C, �; .�. ,. .Z"2:R"�m?F :.'”' .. .'",�`�a. � ,srg..'„"i'°''���,..., '`.v�, a�- ,�t'�. ,.�E" 'S� C Z N N W N IV <fl � cn O O O .46 O O O: O O M 0 0 O 0 0 0 O' o 0 p 2 a w D o 0 -60N C O C7( o- N N C71 O O o O O 0 O 0 00 O O O 0OOO 00 po 0 0 0 O ) lo C) C 'Z -co <fl IV N 00 0 000 o m �- oNO lo 0o OO Oo °o' 0 0 0!, o CD 3 rt « <A 0 W W N N � C co Z v O O 00 O W 0 O O O O O pip O O O O O o O o o o o O O C Z 1 N W N «? <fl a, o°> o cODO O o o in m 1p N 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 p O N co O (D {fl N 00 <fk O) 69 CD {fy GO v Z � d7 000 � N N M p 000 (0 O O � O 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 C Z -1 W N N m 00 0 CD v, m cn _. m i3 v I:N 0 n 0 p o 0 O O O (a Ol D w o p IN W N O O '9) O W rV^^ N N 4 co V i J Z vl O -:ONO 1 N - J -1 o O W 00 -40 :ii N -` O 0 O fJ O O O O O 0 I j i r i j ,r�^`- *�'��- "'^"•' „r: 3`<�*�..m^ °�r'�; ,`�'Sk�""�°-�� ,'�°t�,,,rsrs4;m�5�„es .�;r, .r�t�`.. � _ � -, -�., :. ,.�. `.:.sf :',�,%f"`„ `�C, �; .�. ,. .Z"2:R"�m?F :.'”' .. .'",�`�a. � ,srg..'„"i'°''���,..., '`.v�, a�- ,�t'�. ,.�E" 'S� rn m m m D,D D N ID W N i O O 3 a OW 0 C C CC 00 O O N a A? � m n• 2 2•r O — n 3 CD C — C CD O O 7 N S ? S O R� Sp Sp Sp Sp y n O CO m O O n O1 Al A� p1 N A? :�• r < O G X IT 3. 3 0 SD X C) CD CD Co n p CD w 2) CD CD Cl) w OD m p p1 9 Et _ 3 CD Cn 2) O CD a -n - �0 7N a 7 N N c N N C. C N A 0' O N' N O O cr y i ai fn CD O SD LTI w OD L71 0, r m r r D D 'D D D ' D � D D D' O moo i {f} .iii. 10 N Co W 00 O r- O O 0 O 0 00 0 C) 0 0 O IEO w � CO P -4 {fl 'y, O w CA) cn O a=r O O O 00 O 0 O O O . 0. O0 0' Ali W lGii 0~ -co f0i T . O O O M O N N O O loo O 0 0 O O SO N fa fo V O. W O O O � v O N O O -4 O O 0 0 0 0 O O 0 O 0' -ca O Cci ffl � i 00 0 0 0 N D_rt;n O O -n ?> i 4 O CO CD Cn 0 0 0 O O O 0 n O O O O Ea611, O N O O Efl W .64 P. W ja 0 OD 1 ON OD CO 0 N O 00 c 0 N 40 Cil W T 'm c- N O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 O 00 p cn m -1 lea m P 0 0 0 50 W PD O Cwn O 0 O O 0 Vi cn O b9 0 io A v w AP N : 00 O O CA) T -69 T 44 W N O O co CwOn O 0 O N O: O Ea O 0 cn � 00000o v 00 0' i Z N TO m 0 CD -eft wJP v Cn O 0 Cn m 0 U OD � CO Efl VP N 00 Z O O O W O Co O 00 w O i J 0 00 0 i71 O rn m m m D,D D N ID W N i O O 3 3 OW 0 O CD ul 00 O O N a A? � m n• CA -pi 0 Q— O — n 3 CD C — C CD O O O N X N (7 CD C] O '* 'O Cl) O 5 '6 O ¢� " n O CO m O O O n COD O A 0..Q :�• r CD. O CO CD c 3 -• � 6 a C7 C) CD CD Co n p CD 7 N 0 N q CD O OD � CD p ° C Cr 3 CD Cn 2) O CD a -n - �0 CD �. a 7 Cb N c O C. C N A 0' O N' N O O O -4 C. i fn CD O SD O O W O r m r r cn CD D ri n � D D D' f!D moo i {f} .iii. 10 03 N 0 ( r- O 0 O O0 O O 0 C4 0 C) 0 0 O : ° N w N COO {fl 'y, N O CA) W P. a=r al O O O 0 O 00 0 0' o 0. O0 0' W Ea 0~ lull . O O O M O :, O r O o O loo N 00 SO N V O. W O O NP O 1 O O O O -4 i 0) 0n 0 0 0 0 00 O O Cci ffl � N 00 0 0 co D_rt;n O O -n ?> ti 00 D Ea �Gq v 0 O a O O W n O O O O Ea611, O N O O �3 W p O N ON OD CO O 0 0 O 00 0 40 co W T 'm c- N r� O O C" 4 Co 0 N CD O V N O 0 O 0 O 00 p cn m -1 O m P 0 0 0 O O cn Cwn N w OD •P cn O N 91 p -I A v 64 co 00 N O 0 0 .` 0 w CA) T -69 T 44 W N 0 0 co CwOn co Q O N 0 O CJn O 0 cn 0' 00000o 00 0' 00 Z N �a 40 -eft wJP v Cn � iw rn U OD 0 OOD D W Z O O O rn m m m p W N -� O O 3 m SD CD 00 O O io a A? A m n• 0 0 Q— O — n 3 CD C — C Cp 0 CD X N — O to O 'O N O O Q' CD = n D O CO m -0 a Al y n COD G N *L j17 CD :�• r p O co CD -a m O �0) O Z CL -• � 6 a 3 N, C) CD Co (O CCD p CD 3 .. ` q CD -p `° C a COQ � CD p ° C CD O CD Ci a1 CD O CD a -n - �0 CD �. a 7 � CL m 0 CL cl, C. C C O N' N O i O -4 i fn CD O SD O O W O r m r r cn CD D ri n � -,° f!D moo i {f} .iii. 10 03 al 0 Q O 0 O O O O O C4 0 O : ° N w N COO O 'y, OD °'* O 0 a=r al O cyl O O 0 p O O 0 W 0~ lull . O O N O :, O r O O cn O Cn O N SO O. W O p O O O � i O 1 -4 i 0) 0n 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln O O Cci A 0 00 0 0 Cn D_rt;n -n ?> ti D D Ea �Gq v OD 03 03 a O O n O O O O O O O O �3 W 0 co � f ON OD CO O 0 0 O N iAA cn W T i p r� O O C" 4 Co 0 N CD N O O O O O 0 0 0 O 0 O 00 w 0 m -1 m P 0 w O O cn Cwn rn Z cn E/4 fa ifl -I A v 64 co 00 N O N OO CA) T 1 T 44 0 N 0 0 O O � twn^ i Vd 91 -0 W 0) O 1 cn �. W z CD 120 O O cnC G � CO V7 �0+ N Cn .0 m o' i rat N .0 S N N Cn'e"^'.'— ,r�. . 00 V O) Cn •A w N O 3 -?m O CO m -0 CSpCnN4 w n C�? Q O (D p <« CT CD C ? y Op N SD 3 2) (D SD CD � CD U CD . C7 CQ COD C 7 N I CD CD �. CD N Cl) 7 CD _ O 0 O p CD 3 w CD O r fn CD O SD 7" p� W O O n O CCD Cl) CD O � � -,° moo y, 10 03 0 = 3 -� CD (D !p C4 u O : ° N O 'y, °'* a=r CD 0~ . �(D N i O 1 -4 i 0) _` w U7' 0 0 Ln D D_rt;n -n ?> D D n i p cn W O p 0 N 0 0 00 0 O 00 0 0 m -1 C Z -I N ( � N N D 0 v� W 44 N N CA O Q O N N O CJn cn 0' 00000o 00 0' 00 Z N G Z 4a i 'O O O W O 0 0 O O m ID,, 0 CO 0 0 O w Cn 00 O O. O OND V {� GH Efl C OD _O Ea S4 b4 Z 0 0 ONO 9)0 0 0 (no 0 0 O 0 O O C 'Z Efl {fl fR N fifl �• (n _ 0 O w� O O O rn 0 OO 0 0 O 1cp OO 0 ' O (Dr 3 O N N Z 00 cn O cn 0 W O N Uri O o C O (D O O O O O O O O 0 0 O C Z -I O O SD n N Nip�i p rn co, 0 N' O 0'r 00 10 O W 0 a N 6`4 -6q W C 0 W N P N COO 0 OOD N '•1 O OCnO (n OD O P 000 O O s0 O - O:' G Z N W — 0 - w P1f22fl ' o f3 orn O N p (n rn m v` O N!i O 0 0 n icyl O O 'd 3. TO -Eft -Ga 0 6co C O •P w •N W -� -" : Z GNt (DTI O O U7 N CNTI COO •I O OOO N Cn: CJI O 'O O O ',, Ul co, O O � twn^ i Vd 91 -0 W 0) O 1 cn �. W z CD 120 O O cnC G � CO V7 �0+ N Cn .0 m o' i rat N .0 S N N Cn'e"^'.'— ,r�. . i 3 c 0 N U) -D W ai 0 CD• o N O co oar 0 0 .L �(D N N, (D', N G G) 0 (7) (7) TI co G) 0 -n ' O Gllffl�flW —04h,W - +-FOOD D 3 ( =Or CDW V W (n I 4L So Qo fo I Q C =77�� j 0 O O 9 Cn co 4 O �o O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 zi rn N CD O c 0', o� o Co 3 3 C) c. 0 0 op�6 7 o Da o v O -0000 _ ti c°i > oVO co cnWEi O y N fD 3 CD ci AW D 0 C Rt Q m �c 3= C<i O a CO V CO W 1 W 0 n - :7 w..O CD �. C 0 N CD � 0 w N y. y r �. 3 �. 0 =• :N ID 0 CD CD D...CD :— CAD 7 �cD� CL CD O :3 1000 01010 a — o0 CD co C �. 0 Z � 40 -« Q7 fD CD Q ° u) °• � V - 0 w W .� N CD CD ° 0 q 7 0 to -'co w° (a a- c°7 SD a- 0 co 3 � 0 m 0 co 0 al 0 L 0 oD to ID CL Cn oo CD CL CL m c_ o W00000 .,n j CD w w 7 .. < (�D N. CD n : CD v 00 CD CL 00 o o su -� � c x N (aa = N 7 3- CD W 0 CL a ID Quern a ° ( ( M co 'O CD CD 0 W = 6j 0 N i? 64 IGF# YN C V' O Cn imp XivoW O CL O O O O VCbVCO00W N m . CD 1 O P00000 ' 0 00' 00000 r C p cn Or- �n Z to cn to 1 64 6s j W 69 6s 64 G4 -1.0 luz 000 1 N CNJ7 . 000000 p ,. OWD •CWi1 OOcJV m O CA 0 0 0 0 O', 0 0 OO 00 ja()1 p p 0 00 O W 0 O O O O 00 O 0 0 0 0 00 CD w 69 {0 69 1 -Go, is w _� 1 O W O i l— O O 69 tTi 69 Cn W V O O Ui - O O p. --I O (n O CT7 C� 0000 0P00. U7 O O Cn CD PP-P-01 000p O O,O 4 bib 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 O 0',O 0000, 00 C W 69 - 64 4 G 0000 V 4 O J o 0 o 0 o 0 m 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 O 00 00 N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 0 O pp O M 000`0 2001 CNJ1 Co 0 0000 0 0 0 0 O O 00 00 0' 000Nnp000 N 'G 1 69 64 io i co O OD O V N zpl OD •P V O OOOCn 0000 00'00 0 0 0 0 0 0 OO 00 O 0000 OOC7O O 0'0 1 OOOO NN -4WO 00000 Z O 0'',O 000+V W0 J7 CO -3 ;N. E1Ei 64 6969 O 'Cn OvPOOD U1 0 40pN U7 ." -N O O 0000 m O O - CA 0000 O 00 C1 O O; 00 (n 0000 0000 o 0 00 00 0000 0 0 0 0 oo0io 0000 0 00 Q io Ej 60 69 69 p OP O OD f!3 O 0'� 0000100100 0O Cn O 0,00 O O O Cn O 0Cn 010 0 OOOO OO,OO O OO 000 00,00 O O 00 O O 00 00 W 69 � (n {f? W ONON fg(n0 W NP 00000 0 -410101 Si V n V O W O 00 00 W O OpOO CnU7OO CA OO 0000 0000 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O O bb O O N V a O 69 W{fl 69 69 69 69 W cfl NCVn 69 V ONON {g y}_ �p O 000 OVOUI W (nCnc71N V VOOD O OD 00 WO p 0(.7100 U1CTt00 Ul 00 0000 O O O O 0000 O O; O O 0 O 00 O O W40P �N fo j9 W O W O O 69 f!3 N Cn (D W- O W O O O CO W W OppCN71 OO(J1CNJ7 Cn, 0 0000 O O O 0 O O 00 0 0 0 0 O O bb ION 00 O .V O W OO 6969NUNi (0 w-PP O OWO P CAOOW W OO, 0 00091 0 0 OlU7 Cn OO 0 O 0 0 O 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 00 O 0 c 0 N U) -D W ai 0 CD• o N O co oar 0 0 .L �(D N N, (D', N r r-rrrr W N 1 0 CD C TI co '17 -n -n ' O Gllffl�flW —04h,W D 3 ( =Or CDW 0 M CO 7 po So Qo fo I Q C =77�� CD- O O 9 Cn co 4 O �o O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 zi rn N CD c 0', o� o Co 3 CD CD O 7 CD O m _ ti c 0 N U) -D W ai 0 CD• o N O co oar 0 0 .L �(D N N, (D', N i I, I mm ��;. .� .s ,..raE. -�,- {�; r,... '�r�'?;�s •hr '.9 ..� �. e�. ;,. �"!"'--=- ;,,.:. - ,..`�r,,v_ _�`,... 4TM":�`°?t °:��— '�`- .,'�`� ,r�w=?r �'.s..a°"i,. <.�, ;r, -_•; r�— � Y. O Gllffl�flW —04h,W NO4 V CDW 0 M p N N;AO'00pm CD- O W O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 C. O o o > oVO co cnWEi ci AW 64 0 C v O O CO V CO W 1 W Z � 0 O O •UO7000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 1000 01010 0 C Z N 0 fofc) -'co m 0 co CCP W co 0 al 0 L 0 oD .v iv oo 0 o m c_ o W00000 :u O 00 y N 3 a CD 0 W 6j 0 N 64 IGF# C V' O Cn imp XivoW O Z O O O O VCbVCO00W N m . 1 O P00000 ' 0 00' 00000 C Z 1 64 69 "A 1 N CNJ7 . p ,. OWD •CWi1 m 0 0 0 0 O', CA 0 0 0 W O a CD w 69 {0 69 1 Efi O _� 1 (D C W O N CND�NUOiCODm p. --I O CT7 0!0 U7 O O Cn CD bib bib 0 0 0 0 C Z O 64 69 64 ER m C i.. N N O 1 Cn 69 V i O M W CNJ1 Co m ni 0' 000Nnp000 N 'G a ' 40 a 1 pNP NN -4WO Z p Ol 000+V J7 CO -3 ;N. O O 'Cn IV U1 0 0 U7 O O O C n O O O O i I, I mm ��;. .� .s ,..raE. -�,- {�; r,... '�r�'?;�s •hr '.9 ..� �. e�. ;,. �"!"'--=- ;,,.:. - ,..`�r,,v_ _�`,... 4TM":�`°?t °:��— '�`- .,'�`� ,r�w=?r �'.s..a°"i,. <.�, ;r, -_•; r�— � � -,nno D Om- r g m - , D0D�N zz O a 0 ... ... � _ ., I I ,. _;.,a, . ;:, .. , .;. ., r1 L 5�'. 1 Y,. �'i " ^, t e , +. •.�I . aif. &I -�.� 1� -ar)00 ypD O; D�Dr~^N i sours CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI South Miami AHMMUCHY Inter - office Memorandum 1 • INCORPORATED 1927 � O RAID 2001 TO: Honorable Mayor, Vice Mayor DATE: July 29, 2003 & City Commission FROM: Maria V. Davis- AGENDA ITEM No. �Q City Manager LS RE: Request for authorization to execute Professional Service Work Order for Proposed Downtown Improvements Phase 2 RESOLUTION: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ISSUE A SERVICE WORK ORDER TO CORZO CASTELLA CARBALLO THOMPSON SALMAN, P.A. (C3TS) FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES FOR THE DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 2, IN AN AMOUNT OF $45,240.00 TO BE CHARGED TO SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT GRANT, US HUD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE GRANT (EDI) AND THE US ' EPA STATE TRIBAL ASSISTANCE GRANT ACCOUNT NUMBERS 001- 0000 -132 -2060, 001 - 0000 -132 2063 AND 001- 0000 - 132 -2061; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS As the selected professional engineering and architectural consultant for the Downtown Infrastructure Improvements, C3TS will provide construction phase professional services this Downtown Improvements - Phase 2. As indicated in the attached proposal, the professional services will be performed for the proposed construction activities along SW 73' Street from SW 58th Ave. to SW 58`" Court & SW 58t" Ave. from Sunset Drive to SW 73rd Street. The services will be funded through the South Florida Water Management District grant, the US HUD Economic Development Initiative grant and the US Environmental Protection Agency's State and Tribal` Assistance Grant. The Public Works Department's grants account management sheets, per submitted requisitions, are attached. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Commission approve funding for the work to be performed. 77 Page 2 of 2 Agenda Item... July 29, 03 ATTACHMENTS: ❑ Proposed Resolution ❑ Professional Engineering Services Work Order ❑ Map of project area Project's Budget & Funding Sources fund balance sheets i 2 3 4 5 6 7 RESOLUTION No.: 8 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF 10 SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ISSUE A i i SERVICE WORK ORDER TO CORZO CASTELLA CARBALLO THOMPSON 12 SALMAN, P.A. (C3TS) FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR 13 CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES FOR THE DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENTS 14 PHASE 2, IN AN AMOUNT OF $45,240.00 TO BE CHARGED TO SOUTH 15 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT GRANT, US HUD ECONOMIC 16 DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE GRANT (EDI) AND THE US EPA STATE TRIBAL 17 ASSISTANCE GRANT ACCOUNT` NUMBERS 001- 0000 -132 -2060, 001 - 0000 -132 18 2063 AND -001- 0000 - 132 - 2061 PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE` DATE. 19 20 21 WHEREAS the Mayor and City commission wishes to provide drainage improvements, 22 water main' extension, fire hydrant, wider sidewalk, roadway rehabilitation, street 23 furniture, lighting,' landscaping and pavement marking within the downtown area (SW 24 73rd Street from SW 57th Court to SW 58th Court and SW 58th Ave. from Sunset Drive to 25 SW 73rd Street and; and; 26 27 28 WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida, wishes to use the 29 _ professional services of C3TS, to provide construction engineering services for 30 Downtown Improvements - Phase 2; and 31 32 33 WHEREAS, this portion of the Downtown Improvements — Phase 2 ;professional services 34 will be funded through the South Florida Water Management District grant, US HUD 35 EDI grant and the US EPA STAG grant. 36 37 38 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF 39 THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, that: 40 41 42 Section 1: The City Manager is authorized to execute a Work Order with Corzo Castella 43 Carballo Thompson Salman, P.A. in connection with the construction engineering 44 services for Downtown Improvements - Phase 2 project, in an amount of $45,240.00, 45 from account numbers 001- 0000 - 132 - 2060, 001- 0000 -132 -2063 and 001- 0000 -132 -2061. 46 47 F ;ors,:7,s� A`_, ,?,'k{`- 48 Section 2: The attached proposal, Professional Service Work Order, is made part of the 49 resolution. 50 51 Section 3: This resolution shall be effective immediately. 52 53 PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 2003. 54 55 ATTEST: APPROVED: 56 57 58 Ronetta Taylor, City Clerk Horace Feliu, Mayor 59 60 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: 61 62 63 64 CITY ATTORNEY Commission Vote: 65 Mayor Feliu: 66 Vice Mayor Russell: 67 Commissioner McCrea: 68 Commissioner Bethel: 69 Commissioner Wiscombe: P-1 �17 EB0005022 AAC002142 SW 73u Street (from SW 58th Court to SW 57th Court) SW 58th Avenue (from Sunset Drive to SW 73`d Street)" Proposed improvements include sidewalks, curbing, drainage, landscaping, irrigation, paving, street furniture, water main extensions, lighting, pavement marking and signing. SCOPE OF SERVICES: 1. Assist in obtaining and reviewing all documents needed in executing the contract between the City and the Contractor. 2. Attend pre- construction conference: 3. Attend bi- weekly project meetings and prepare minutes. 4. Answer contractor BFI's and issue clarifications as needed. 5. Perform Construction <Engineering "Inspections '(10 hrs. minimum per week quarter time Resident Inspector). 6. Review and approve / disapprove all shop drawings. 7. Review the Contractor's Application for Payment and submit recommendation to the City. 8. Review and process Change Order requests. 9. Perform project closeout with Contractor including final inspection, punch list, final Application for Payment review, and submit Certificate of Completion. These services are based on and limited to a construction period of 5 months. WORK ORDER FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO: City of South Miami Date: 07/21/03 Public Works Department File: 1929 -15 4795 SW 75th Avenue South Miami, Florida 33155 ATTENTION: W. Ajibola Balogun, Public Works Director PROJECT NAME: Downtown Improvements - Phase 11 City of South Miami, Florida Construction Phase Services SCOPE OF PROJECT: Streetscape /Infrastructure improvements along the following streets (as shown on attached site plan): 901 Ponce de Leon Blvd., Suite 900 Coral Gables, Florida 33134 305.445.2900 1.800.448.0227 Facsimile 305.445.3366 Web Site: www.c3ts.com Equal Opportunity Employer City of South Miami W.O. Downtown Improvements — Phase 11 July 21, 2003 Page 2 TERMS AND CONDITIONS: All terms and conditions shall be per our General Agreement for Professional Services for Downtown Infrastructure Improvements. Our fees for the above services shall be as per the following lump sum fee schedule: Construction 'Phase ................... ....... ;......... ........ .........$45,240 The City of South Miami will be responsible for any permit fees, and these are not included in the above fees. We are ready to begin working on this assignment upon your authorization to proceed. If acceptable to you, we will accept a signed copy of this form as you' r written authorization to proceed with the assignment. Thank you. Corzo Castella Carballo Thompson Salman, P.A. Ramon Castella, P.E. Vice - President RC /er City of South Miami Approved by: Date: L:\ Projects\ 1929- 00 \W.O- Proposals \W.O. Dwntwn lmpPhase110717031I.doc Corzo Castella Carballo Thompson Salman, P.A. Fee Worksheet - Page 1 FEE WORKSHEET DATE: July 21, 2003 PROJECT: Downtown Improvements - Phase II City of South Miami Construction Phase: (Assumes 5 month construction period) Landscaping /Irrigation Sub- Consultant $1,750 Materials and Supplies - Field $150 Total $45,240 L:\ Projects\ 1929- 00\W.O. Proposal\ FeeWorksheetDowntwnPhl- 07170311.xls i i I Pre - construction Conference 4 4 4 2 Shop Drawing Review 12 12 2 Bi- weekly Meetings 12 24 18 12 Contractor RFI and;Clarifications 12 24 12 6 Contractor Payment Requisitions 4 12 12 12 4 Contractor Change Order & Requests 8 16 12 4 Quarter -time Resident Inspection (2hrs /day) 6 -36 16 220 8 Final Inspection & Close -out 4 16 16 8 4 Construction Phase Sub -Total Hours 50 144 98 244' 42 Billing Rate 140 95 75 55 45 Labor Cost $7,000 $13,680 $7,350 $13,420 $1,890 Labor Sub -Total $43,340 Landscaping /Irrigation Sub- Consultant $1,750 Materials and Supplies - Field $150 Total $45,240 L:\ Projects\ 1929- 00\W.O. Proposal\ FeeWorksheetDowntwnPhl- 07170311.xls i i I �cc C d N N o V a 0 0 Z W O O N N uj O rt R.�� - 00000000000OOOOOOOO 0000OOOOOOO o;oLnLn0000 O CM M M O O O O O LO CO 6 6 cN C0 00 00 00 01-N(D rr r'0 t N 0 0 01'-r- '0M) 0) O,t000MM M0M0M MNM�rti �ti O 0) LO I- CO CA 0 CO "t LO 00 CO LO ti - 00 CO CO 0000 LOLO't ItNOOM N0000LONNN V le 0CAOCD0) 0) 00 COCbti til-CflLOd'd''td' LU Z Q dm e(fleq.e,16r> GF> 6",16e-6c� 1 V!�c!r e9- �61.)- 61.:� 6rk(r�03,� F- o000000000OOOOOO oOO0000000OOLOOLOO o o Z N OOMO LO CO to O OOOtnp O `O r r t0 O'OMO� O O O O N O LO N O Q LA00�00 0r` r- MO OCOMN0M N 6 C71-7 Ittd d d C6 Cq 00 I.NOOQ(ON Q CNN rr CO NOrMN r 0) M r r r /wA\ a O a ti 0) r M CO pO r O �- CA LO d ti OD or t�'OM�M O r r r r 0 f 't r O O O NN O 'O It O U') O n. � � �r v� d- �. d- �' LO LO LO LO LO LO 22 r NNN N MM C9C9MM �' ul 0000 C) 0 OoO OOONO oOOOO °0000 O NNNN CA 04 N0 (r O Cr D r NN 0r 0 ` N CO i. LO Ul) LO t O 0) 0) r r It CS LO M CO r CO U)< a¢� Ct) LO LO M j M r N M d '00 d N O O 'O U V V'U V CL CL o O � N U. Z CNO '^ _ v/ O O ci O V ° ° a r r O N p y O N VN O c N N 0� ~ '7 O z CD Cu Q O - O _C `' c � O 06 O Q C2 'C O) N Z G N C B O LO 0 C E O � a .a ._ Q N Q U U •� _ ~ O Q >: W W U) c N a) N E E W� J O Ali �a:oY o > ? � 0 a� __ C C C mcncncna F- F- F- ��v i'- > CA c �� L I- O O.- U EMMM? ?M 0 NM �' §'UUY� YUU'UF- F- UOU� -U « 0 0 Z W O O N N uj O rt R.�� - i CO 0 z W M O O N_ M N W c ■ O m o o o o LOU') 000 0 0 ONNNINN NNNNN NN O � L(j 1t7 'Ln lA -� tC) 6C? 1f7 Lti lSY Ln O 00:00 W DO cq OQ 00 C0 00 00 00 00 U U W Z v d 't It It 0 J w m LO 0. Z cry � Q Q O N O ti O 00 W CO cq v LO V � � Q a � E— -j z` z Q m cN a a¢ W W F - a 0 a T y�yy TF O N H � Z1 N M O', T V C) CD a C) i T Q 0 c ❑ z Q o W :r, N ; Z H N 00 Q W 0 W,'. � D W e"O=w Alk �m� ;. �yDrN 0 o� Sours CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI South Miami NI- AmerieaGily Inter -office Memorandum , ' INCORPORATED �.. ' 1927 O.R10 2001 TO: Honorable Mayor, Vice Mayor BATE: July 29, 2003 & City Commission r FROM: Maria V. Davis AGENDA ITEM No. City Manager RE: Request for authorization to execute Professional Service Work Order for Proposed Citywide Drainage Improvements i RESOLUTION: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, '' FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE WORK ORDER WITH KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR SERVICES OF DATA COLLECTION, SURVEY /TESTING, DRAINAGE DESIGN, PRE CONSTRUCTION AND CONSTRUCTION ,PHASES FOR CITYWIDE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS (4800 BLOCK OF SW 64TH ST., SW 49TH ST., SW 49TH TERR.), IN AN AMOUNT OF $49,550' TO BE CHARGED' TO SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT GRANT ACCOUNT 001 - 0000- 132 -2060; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS: As one of our professional general engineering consultants, Kimley -Horn & Associates, Inc. will be providing professional civil engineering services for the proposed Citywide Drainage Improvements project. ` The professional services will include Engineering Route Surveying, Geotechnical Services,` Design & Permitting, Bidding and Construction Phase services. The proposed improvement shall provide much needed drainage improvements and minimal right -of -way repairs to approximately 2,300 lineal feet of right -of -ways at: • SW 49th Street from SW 67th Avenue to the city limit (midway between SW 641'' Court and SW 64th Place. • SW 49th Terrace, from SW 67th Avenue to SW 65th Avenue ❑ SW 64th Court, from SW 48th Street to SW 49th Street ❑ SW 65th Avenue, from SW 49th' Street to SW 50th Street The services will be funded through the 2002 South Florida Water Management District grant. The Public Works Department's grants account management sheet, per submitted requisitions, is attached. Page 2 of 2 Agenda Item. July 22, 03 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Commission approve 'funding for the work to be performed ATTACHMENTS: ❑ Proposed Resolution Ll Professional Engineering Services Work Order ❑ Map of project area ❑ Project's Budget & Funding Source fund balance sheet , j 1 2 3 4 5 . 6 7' 8 9 10 11 RESOLUTION NO. 12 13 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH 14 MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL 15 SERVICE WORK ORDER WITH KIMLEY- HORN '& ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR SERVICES OF 16 DATA COLLECTION, SURVEY /TESTING, DRAINAGE DESIGN, PRE - CONSTRUCTION AND 17 CONSTRUCTION PHASES FOR CITYWIDE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS (4800 BLOCK OF 18 SW 64TH ST., SW 49TH ST., SW 49TH TERR.), IN AN AMOUNT OF $49,550 TO BE CHARGED 19 TO 'SOUTH, FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT GRANT ACCOUNT 001 - 0000 -132- 2060; 20 PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE 21 22 23 WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida, wishes to use the professional 24 services Consulting Engineering & Science, Inc., to provide route survey, geotechnical testing, onsite 25 data collection, preparation of designs & permitting; bidding and construction phase services for 26 Citywide Drainage Improvements along SW 49th Street from SW 67th Avenue to midway between 27 SW 64th Court & SW 64th Place, SW 49th Terrace from SW 6701 Avenue to SW 65th Avenue, SW 64 t 28 Court, from SW 48th Street to SW 49th Street and SW 65th Avenue from SW 49th Street to SW 50th 29 Street; and 30 31 32 WHEREAS, Kimley -Horn & Associates, Inc. is one of the City's approved Professional General 33 Engineering Consultants; and 34 35 36 WHEREAS, the proposed services will be funded through South Florida Water Management District. 37 38 39 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY 40 OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, THAT: 41 42 Section l: The City Manager is authorized to execute a Work Order with Consulting Engineering & 43 Science, Inc. for the professional services in connection with route survey, geotechnical testing, onsite 44 data collection, preparation of designs & permitting, bidding phase services' and construction 45 administration services for Citywide Drainage Improvements along SW 49th Street from SW 67th 46 Avenue to midway between SW 64th Court & SW 64th Place, SW 49th Terrace from SW 67th Avenue 47 to SW 65th Avenue, SW 64th Court, from SW 48th Street to SW 49th Street and SW 65th Avenue from 48 SW 491h Street to SW 50th Street in an amount of $49,550.00 from account number 001- 0000 -132- 49 2060. 50 51 52 l 53,, 54 Section 2: That the attached proposal, Professional Service Work Order, be made a part of the 55 resolution. 56 57 Section 3: This resolution shall be effective immediately. 58 59 PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 2003: 60 61 ATTEST: APPROVED: 62 63 Ronetta Taylor, City Clerk Horace Feliu, Mayor 64 65 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: 66 67 CITY ATTORNEY Commission Voter 68 Mayor Feliu: 69 Vice Mayor Russell: 70 Commissioner McCrea: 71 Commissioner Bethel: 72 Commissioner Wiscombe: 73 i 2 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WORK ORDER Date: July 21, 2003 To: City of South Miami Public Works Department 4795 SW 75' Avenue South Miami, Florida 33155 Project Name: Citywide Drainage Improvements (4800 Blk. SW 64th Ct. SW 49th St. & SW 49th Terr.) Funding Source: City of South Miami This project will be in accordance with the "Professional Service Agreement - General Engineering Services ", (AGREEMENT) between; the City of South Miami (CITY) and Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. (CONSULTANT), as approved by the City Commission on August 7, 2001 (Resolution No. 112 -01- 11260). The following scope of services for this work order shall supercede, in its entirety, Section of the above - noted Professional Services Agreement. Description of Project: The scope of this work order shall include professional civil engineering services related to the preparation of Design plans, Specifications and Contract Documents for proposed improvements. The scope shall also include providing limited assistance to the Client during the regulatory /permitting phase, _ bidding and contractor selection process, construction phase, and closeout of the project. The design shall provide for drainage system improvements and minimal right -of -way repair of approximately 2,300 LF of roadway, to include the following: ❑ SW 49th Street, from SW 67th Avenue to midway between SW 64th Court and 64th Place. ❑ SW 49th Terrace, from SW 67th Avenue to SW 65th Avenue ❑ SW 64th Court, 'from .SW 48th Street to SW 49th Street ❑ SW 65th Avenue, from SW 49th Street to SW 50th Street The following scope of services shall supercede in its entirety the Professional Services section of our contract with the City. Scope of Services and schedule of Fees: 1.0 DESIGN AND PERMITTING PHASE: 1.01 Attend one "kick -off' meeting and initial coordination with City of South Miami Public Works Department. 1.02 Perform and submit drainage analysis and design, with engineering calculations. 1.03 Prepare design plans for the Drainage System and minimal roadway resurfacing. 1.04 Provide technical criteria and submit for permits from applicable regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over the project. 1.05 Provide updated Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost. 1.06 Prepare Construction Contract Agreement & Design Specification Document (Project Manual). 1.07 Furnish 95% complete plans and Project Manual and attend one meeting to review the project with the City's Public Works Director and /or staff. 1.08 Furnish 12 copies of final plans and project manual to the Engineering Construction Department. The fee for the Design and Permitting Phase of the project will be Lump Sum amount of $19,730.00 2.0 BID AND CONSTRUCTION PHASE: 2.01 Provide bid advertisement documents, respond to bidders' questions and attend pre -bid conference. 2.02 Prepare addenda to Bid Documents, if required. 2.03 Attend Bid Opening. 2.04 Tabulate and evaluate bids received, check references of responsible lowest bidder and make recommendation. I 2.05 `' reviewing ocuments needed to execute the Assist. m obtaining and re g ,g contract between the City and the contractor. 2.06 Attend Pre- construction conference: 2.07 Perform Construction Engineering, Observations (not to exceed four hours per week) and submit reports. 2.08 Review and approve:/ disapprove shop drawings. 2.09 Review Contractors' Requests for Change Orders (RCO) and Applications for Payment and submit recommendation to the Engineering & Construction Director. 2.10 Perform project closeout with contractor, final review, punch list, final application for payment review and submit Certificate of Completion. 2.11 Secure "As- builts" from the contractor in both reproducible and electronic formats and submit to the City. I The fee for the Bid & Construction Phase of the P roject will be a Lump Sum amount of $19,820.00 3.0 ENGINEERING ROUTE SURVEY: .. flPS 7- Perform Engineering Route Survey of the above referenced roadways. Three sets of the survey drawings are to be provided signed and sealed by a Professional Land Surveyor registered in the State of Florida. Electronic drawing <(dwg) files of the survey drawings are also to be provided in AutoCAD format. The fee for the Engineering Route Survey Phase of the project is a Lump Sum amount of $9,000.00 4.0 GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES: Perform two SFWMD Constant -head, Usual Open Hole Tests within the project limits. Results from additional percolation tests performed during the "Northend Drainage Improvements" project will be combined with results from the two proposed tests in order to evaluate the range of hydraulic conductivity for the area. For this reason, it was felt that additional testing should not be required. The fee for the Geotechnical Services Phase of the project will be a Lump Sum amount of $1,000.00 The total fee for professional civil' ;engineering' services is a Lump Sum amount of $49,550.00 1 i �,rE ,- r , :., ,,, .. ,.. ,,; ., ,a- �- ,`, -,, ,,.-,:,.>,;�% -.rem -- r+-��- .- .•- ,.,'�";.:m -. w-""'_ �; v^.- -r°^.: �° _ .c,. ,';'7<; `F,:, � .,�.vT. _ a h�'�4"i 'si`.".: tE:.R'k.,;'` —Fx ;, a .. '.: �'+ `CT^^ -Sr'nll v�"�'vrY..�T- ei".�"� „r�, ,`3 �'�.. -+,., .. •�- �.;`+�M1'S ,'°,�",^?t�^:a �}"�',':"M""S"'''; ..Ri;°, �TF,"","r� "�'�"Y;,. s�.',R�`w�F.�?'�a ` ... ,.`''e+'s'c �{ ��_�* . Sire. +°F. ':.. -�i -� - t �niuni ��N�I��INnIIIU�I�NnI IIIINIIIIIIAAnIIINlll�ll � _ ���lullll I�IAll�llllllllll R IIIIANAn NAIIIA MIIRN NN�I N .,�.vT. _ a h�'�4"i 'si`.".: tE:.R'k.,;'` —Fx ;, a .. '.: �'+ `CT^^ -Sr'nll v�"�'vrY..�T- ei".�"� „r�, ,`3 �'�.. -+,., .. •�- �.;`+�M1'S ,'°,�",^?t�^:a �}"�',':"M""S"'''; ..Ri;°, �TF,"","r� "�'�"Y;,. s�.',R�`w�F.�?'�a ` ... ,.`''e+'s'c �{ ��_�* . Sire. +°F. ':.. uj a > .0 U)� oa '02 � UW d U) Q can Z oU U O 0_ m O W dam' : V W Z va O O U a) cu E M _O O n 0 O c U D ... 'ry r�,r' ��..-��'t'�+S'.•... Vic;'; .. ., r., .: '.rs.: ",-°r `fa',`,�,.�.;.. .;: soU'r South Miami F All- NnericaCilY • INCORPORATED 1927 r' R .t+c 0 R I 2001 . i TO; Honorable Mayor, Vice Mayor DATE: Jelly 29, 2003 and City Commission FROM: Maria V. Davis �s' AGENDA ITEM NO..____ City Manager RE: Rescind Resolution No.. 90 -03 -11639 RESOLUTION A `'RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,' FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE AMENDMENT OF THE 2002/03 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET TO COVER A PROJECTED SHORTFALL OF $703,812; RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 90 -03- 11639; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO UTILIZE CASH RESERVES IN THE AMOUNT OF $73,125 TO REIMBURSE EMPLOYEES FOR CONTRIBUTIONS FOR INSURANCE PREMIUMS TO ACCOMMODATE FISCAL YEAR 2002/03 BUDGET SHORTFALL; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS On June 10, 2003, the City of South Miami amended the budget and selected various cost containment options to fund the projected budget shortfall. The City Commission selected options A, B, C and E` of Resolution No. 90- 03- 11639. Option A included employees sharing the cost of all health insurance premiums in the amount of 50 %. Option B included a seven day unpaid furlough for each employee during the present' fiscal year. To avert costly litigation with the Labor Unions, negotiations have resulted in the reversal of options A and B. The City will "reimburse employees for costs incurred for payment of insurance premiums, and the seven days of furlough will be restored by way of adding 3.5 vacation days to employee leave banks for the next two fiscal years. Option C included "delaying or terminating any non -life saving projects." That option will remain j in effect. Option E included utilizing cash reserves in the amount necessary to balance the budget for the year. The City's cost for the reimbursement of employee health insurance premiums is in the amount of $73,125, which will be funded through cash reserves. ?; ' °— T -..- .,- „,.- :""`^— ;,?�,.arfi",a�l ., RECOMMENDATION: " It is recommended that the City Commission rescind Resolution No. 90 -03 -11639 and approve the attached resolution. Attachment: Resolution No. (90 -03- 11639) Conuois m lnsmaoee ee®6msement 2003 , a i i , i i E f r x ,. ,r.�.°mxs ,.. ,�, r „°�.^, r^`�';�... ,...:. .`.�7."..`;i'�`�^,x.- '��",' ate. .t"'r, -...� -��,. �" oc�""�°�.`•,`°., ,-. _�';°.�"�,�", �„`.,��;`t?�': ,...Tt e�;..:.s.,'{., �' »„�,�,,::'�' „'-�. ,, I RESOLUTION NO. 2 3 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE 5 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE AMENDMENT 6 OF THE 2002/03 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET TO A COVER A PROJECTED 7 OF $703,812; RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 90- 03- 11639; AND 8 AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO UTILIZE CASH RESERVES 9 IN THE AMOUNT OF $739125 TO REIMBURSE EMPLOYEES FOR 10 CONRTRIBUTIONS FOR INSURANCE PREMIUMS; PROVIDING AN 11 EFFECTIVE DATE. 12 13 14 WHEREAS, the City Commission at its June 10, 2003 Commission 15 meeting adopted Resolution No. 90 -03- 11639, which - provided various cost 16 containment options to fund the projected shortfall of $703,812; and 17 18 WHEREAS, the City Commission selected options A, B, C and E. 19 } 20 WHEREAS, to ' avert costly litigation with the City's Labor Unions, 21 negotiations have resulted in the reversal of options A and B. 22 23 WHEREAS, the City will reverse option A and reimburse employees for 24 costs incurred for contributions of insurance premiums; and reverse option B by 25 restoring seven days of unpaid furlough by way of adding 3.5 vacation days to 26 employee leave banks for fiscal years 2003/04 and 2004/05; and 27 28 WHEREAS, the City's cost for reimbursement of health insurance a 29 premiums is in the amount of $73,125; and t 30 31 WHEREAS, the $73,125 will be funded through cash reserves. 32 33 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY 34 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA; 35 y 36 Section 1. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to utilize $73,125 37 from the cash reserve fund to reimburse employees for insurance premium 38 contributions from July 1-September 30, 2003. 39 40 Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to restore the 41 seven day unpaid furlough by way of adding 3.5 vacation days to employee leave 42 banks for Fiscal Years 2003/04 and 2004/05. k Additions shown by underlining and deletions shown by e•stf*ifig• 1 2 Section 3 That Resolution No. 90 -03 -11639 is hereby rescinded. 3 4 Section 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon approval. 5 6 PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of _ , 2003. 7 8 ATTEST: APPROVED: 9: 10 11 CITY CLERK MAYOR 12 13 Commission Vote: 14 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mayor Felu: 15 Vice Mayor Russell: 16 Commissioner Wiscombe: 17 CITY ATTORNEY Commissioner Bethel: 1$ Commissioner McCrea: 19 i Page 2 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. 90 -03 -11639 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY _COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA RELATING TO AMENDMENT OF 2002 -03 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET; SELECTING DIFFERENT OPTIONS FROM THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE ACTING CITY MANAGER TO AMEND THE 2002 -03 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET IN ORDER TO COVER PROJECTED SHORTFALL OF $602,157, PURSUANT TO ARTICLE IV F(1) OF THE CITY CHARTER; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the 2002 -03 fiscal; year budget was initially revised in February 2003 by means of approval of resolution number 26 -03 -11575 by the City Commission; and WHEREAS, subsequent to approval of the revision, the City was presented with several unforeseen expenditures ' that need to be paid from the current fiscal year's budget resulting in projected deficit of $602,157 for the year; and i WHEREAS, in an attempt to provide funding to cover the projected shortfall, the City Administration has considered several; options and providing the following recommendations to the City Commission for selection of one, or combination of two or more items to reach the needed amount: a) Sharing the cost of all insurance premiums 50-50 between the City and all employees. b) One or two -week furlough for each employee between now and end of the fiscal year. c) Reduce the projected operating cost by delaying or terminating any non life - savings projects. d) Institute layoff policy for the remainder of the fiscal year with effective date of Judy 1, 2003 for those positions presented in the attached list prepared by the City' Administration. e) Use cash reserve in the amount necessary to balance the budget for the year. I ,- ., c ,.., -.. r , .. --.- .,.;., , ", ,...^- ,. r x..' a;'"t;f .'`°; - r--` °?;'€T. Se�r',�p S >„ ",'•.xF k'ad" re;' ,' ,.'zr Pg. 2 of Res. No. 90 -03 -11639 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA THAT; Section 1. The City Manager is hereby authorized to implement option(s) a: $73,125, b: $204,977, c: $25,710, and e: $298,345 to cover the projected shortfall for the 2002 -03 fiscal year.> Section 2. The attached expenditures and revenues projection reports are hereby accepted as amended general fund budget for the remainder of 2002 -03 fiscal year.` Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon approval. jPASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of June,, 2003. ATTE APPROVED. i CITf CLERK kAYOR I , I COMMISSION VOTE: 4 -1 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mayor Feliu: Yea Vice Mayor Russell: Yea Commissioner Wiscombe: Yea CITY ATTORNEY Commissioner Bethel: Yea Commissioner McCrea: Nay Soul, CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI :South :Miami bcftd r AN-AmLdca ft 4 Excellence, Integrity, Inclusion ' INCORPORATED ' 1927 2001 TO: Honorable Mayor, Vice Mayor DATE: June 10, 2003 & City Commission FROM; Sanfo rd A..Youkilis ITEM No. 6 Acting City Manager RE: FY 2002 -03 Budget Amendment Options RESOLUTION, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE .;CITY 'OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA RELATING TO AMENDMENT OF 2002 -03 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET; SELECTING DIFFERENT OPTIONS FROM THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE ACTING CITY MANAGER TO AMEND THE 2002 -03 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET IN ORDER TO COVER PROJECTED SHORTFALL OF $103,`812, PURSUANT TO ARTICLE IV F(1) OF THE CITY CHARTER; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS In February 2003, the City Commission approved a revised FY 2002 -03 budget with projected expenditures of $12,353,584 and projected revenues of $`12,439,532. The. overage amount between the projected revenues and expenses was approved to be added to the City cash reserve to make up; the shortfall from last fiscal year in order to maintain "a reserve level of $1,200,000, as mandated by the City Commission. From the time the initial revised budget was approved by the City Commission, several unforeseen expenditures have occurred, resulting in new higher projected expenditures total for FY- 2002 -03 against relatively same level' of revenues projection as in February. The projected expenditures total being submitted to you now for consideration is $12,997,842, and the revenues projection is $12,395,685. These two amounts, when combined with the deficit from last fiscal year,' result in current year's projected deficit of $703,812. In the next page is a table, summary of these numbers for easy understandings Beginning Cash from 10/1/02 $1,098,345(dus to 01/02 deficit) PLUS: Projected Revenues 02/03 FY 12,395,685 MINUS: Projected Expenditures 02 /03FY (12,997,842) Mandated Cash Reserve (`1,200,000) Projected Deficit 02/03 FY (703,812) It should be noted that the City Commission approved about $91,000 of the projected deficit to be taken out of the cash reserve during the May 20, 2003 commission meeting. Additional $24,527.49 was approved from the same reserve account on June 3,'2003 meeting. The projected deficit for FY 02/03 is due to the following expenditures which we did not anticipate at the time of our budget revision in February. Shortfall of Pension Contribution for FY 01/02 $367,000 Shortfall in City Attorney's FY 02/03 budget 79,278 *($24,527.49 already approved) Arbitration Settlement for Officer Benfiel'd 35,845* already approved Settlement Offer for Mr. John Hampton' 39,443* already approved Increase in liability /workers comp insurance premium due to audit 96,317 Cost of new City Manager hiring Process 10,000* already approved Additional' funds needed to pay ; the lobbyists 6,567* already approved Anticipated salary for the new City Manager through the end FY02 /03 53,819 Deficit from FY 01/02 127,000 ---------- u- The above listed expenditures do not total exactly to the amount of deficit being reported because the City Administration has taken some actions to save funds in some other areas of the budget to minimize the impact to the cash reserve. Some of the actions taken so far include distribution of Payroll Ifachnician's duties among the Finance Department staff, and leaving the poaition of Planning Director open through the end of the _current fiscal year. I will like to inform the Commission that the projected expenditures under consideration do not include costs of some ongoing issues that I am aware of, but the City has not reached a final deliberation on them. These include the pension matters' for the former City Manager Charles Scurr and former Police Officer Lisea- Merrick. ''In addition, the cost of implementing the early retirement pension plan incentives recently being considered` by the City is not included in the projection. The additional pension contribution of about $350,000 needed for the 2002 -03 fiscal year, as advised by the Pension Actuary at the City Commission meeting of April 22, 2003; and the annual Red Sunset' Merchants Association contribution of $18,000` are not included as well. ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS This is a challenging time for the City and the amount of potential deficit we' are ' facing this fiscal year represents a great challenge, which requires thorough consideration of all the potential solutions to reach a viable resolution. Along this vein, I am proposing the following different alternatives for the City Commission to consider for reduction of the deficit in the current year. These alternatives are as follows: a) Sharing the cost of all insurance premiums 50 -50 between the j City and all employees., b) One or two -week furlough for each employee between now and end of the fiscal year. c) Reduce the projected operating cost. d) Institute layoff policy for the remainder of the fiscal year with effective date of July 1, 2003 for those positions presented in the attached list prepared by the City Administration. e) Use cash reserve in the amount necessary to balance the budget for the year. j a) 50 -50 COST SHARING OF ALL INSURANCE PREMIUMS BETWEEN THE CITY AND EMPLOYEES Projected Savings: Quarterly - $73,125 Annual - $292,500 The current annual cost of employees' insurance premium to the City is about $585,000 Of this amount, the City pays $11...36 as supplement for each participating employees' dental coverage, and one hundred' percent of the life, health and disability insurance coverage. The City may consider an option to share the cost of the insurance coverage with all employees at the rate of 50 -50 for this year, effective' July 1, 2003. At the discretion of the City Commission, it may be considered a recurring savings to the City budget if the City Commission chooses to make this a permanent policy. The quarterly and annual savings are shown above. b) ONE OR TWO-WEEK FURLOUGH FOR ALL EMPLOYEES BETWEEN NOW AND END OF THE FISCAL' YEAR Projected Savings One- week furlough - $150,000 Two -week furlough' - $300,000 This option involves each employee taking a one or two -week no pay leave between now and end of the fiscal year. If it is approved by the City Commission, we will draw up a plan to make it less financially burdensome for our employees and less impact on City services by allowing them to choose the convenient` time they would take their leave. It can be taken all at once, if it will not seriously impact the department services, or reduce the number of hours worked each week by all employees for the rest of the fiscal year. We have estimated the total salary 'savings with benefits to the budget for a one or two -week furlough above. The amounts shown can also be considered an interim recurring savings, if the City Commission decides to continue the policy until the City financial conditions improve in the future. c) REDUCE THE-:11PROJECTED OPERATING COST Projected Savings $25,710 I have carefully reviewed again the initial expenditures projections submitted to you during the June 3, workshop, and it is my opinion that we can further reduce the projected balance in some of the line items of the - budget. The accounts affected by the suggested reductions are as follows; Account #:001 - 1100- 511.4120, City Comm. Communications $500 Account #:001- 1760 - 519 -4680, Motor Pool Outside Services $5,000 Account #:001 - 1790 - 519 -3100, Engineering & Construction - $12,021 Account# :001- 1790- 519 -3450, Engineering & Construction - $8,189 d) INSTITUTE LAYOFF OF SELECTED POSITIONS EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2003 THROUGH END OF THE FISCAL YEAR Projected Savings Quarterly - $158,837 Annual - $825,188 Criteria Used in Selection of positions The selection of positions included in the potential layoff was based on equitable distribution of the negative impact of the cuts on all departments with the potential of transferring some or all of the ! duties, pertaining to the affected employee to another employee in the department, with minimal effect on services. However, it must be said that implementation of the level of ` layoffs' as requested by the City Commission and being proposed now cannot take effect without a significant reduction in the level of services provided to the taxpayers. The effect of the layoffs as it applies to each of the 21 positions is presented in the attached Appendix A for your review. i e) USE OF CASH RESERVE 0 The City Commission may approve the use of combination of cash reserve and any of the other listed options totaling to the needed amount of $703,812.`Any, amount approved will reduce the remaining balance in the City cash 'reserve from the beginning balance of $1,098,345. E RECOMMENDATION Due to the impact of the layoff option on City services, I am not recommending that alternative. It is recommended that the City Commission` approve combination of option (b) two -week furlough, _plus option, (c) operating cost reduction and option (e) use of cash reserve to meet the projected deficit. Attachments Projected Revenues Projected Expenditures, i Appendix A SAY /HKO !I I _ i 1 RESOLUTION NO. 13 2 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO ELECTIONS; 5 REQUESTING THE MIAMI -DADE COUNTY MANAGER ENSURE THAT, 6 REGARDLESS OF VOTING `SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, THERE 7 IS PRODUCED A PAPER RECORD,OF EVERY BALLOT CAST, AS AN 8 ELEMENT OF MINIMUM STANDARDS OF INTEGRITY, NOT LATER 9 THAN THE:2004 GENERAL ELECTION PROCESS, AND SUPPORTING 10 THE PROPOSED MIAMI -DADE COUNTY RESOLUTION REQUIRING 11 FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THE HELP AMERICA VOTE ACT OF' 2002 12 (HAVA); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE 13 14 WHEREAS, the South Miami City Commission is committed to 15 protecting the rights of voters in Miami -Dade County, to re- 16 establishing voter confidence in the process, and to improving 17 upon the 2000 and 2002 elections; and 18 19 WHEREAS, the Help America Vote Act of 2002 ("HAVA") 20 requires voting systems produce a permanent, paper record with a. 21 manual audit capacity that shall be available as an official 22 record for any recount conducted; and 23 24 WHEREAS, HAVA requires voting systems provide voters an 25 opportunity to change their ballots or _correct any error before 26 the permanent paper record is produced; and 27 28 WHEREAS, providing a verifiable paper record and allowing 29 voters to confirm their choices will help re- establish voter 30 confidence, as well as satisfy the legal requirement that a 31 ballot provide a clear indication of the intent of the voter; 32 and 33 34 WHEREAS, history has shown that elections can be close, 35 making manual recounts necessary. 36 37 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY` 38 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA; 39 40 Section 1 That the South- Miami City Commission requests 41 that Miami -Dade County ensure its minimum standard of election 42 integrity include a paper record of every ballot cast, 43 regardless of systems and technologies the county my employ. 44 45 Section 2. That the South Miami City Commission further requests 46 Miami -Dade county ensure that a paper record of every ballot 47 cast be in effect by or before the 2004 general election 48 process, Additions shown by underlining and deletions shown by everstr-ikifig. 1 2 Section 3. That the South Miami City Commission supports Miami 3 Dade County's proposed resolution, which directs the County 4 Manager to ensure that Miami -Dade County is in compliance with 5 HAVA in all respects 6 7 Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to provide 8 copies of this executed resolution to the Miami -Dade County 9 Manger and Commission, all Miami -Dade County Municipalities, and 10 the Miami -Dade Election Reform Coalition. 11 12 Section 5. This resolution shall take effect immediately 13 upon approval 14 15 PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 2003. 16 17 ATTEST: APPROVED: 18 19 20 Horace G. Feliu 21 Mayor 22 Ronetta Taylor,' CMC 23 City Clerk 24 25 COMMISSION VOTE: 26 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mayor Feliu: 27 Vice Mayor Russell: 28 Commissioner Wiscombe: 29 CITY ATTORNEY Commissioner Bethel 30 Commissioner McCrea: 31 E Page ,2 of 2