The URL can be used to link to this page

06-08-04 Item 7CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI Inter - office Memorandum TO: Honorable Mayor, Vice Mayor RESOLUTION: South Miami All - America CRY 2001 DATE: June 8, 2004 AGENDA ITEM No. RE: Accepting the Pu is Swimming Pool Feasibility Study — Murray Park Master Plan Update A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC SWIMMING POOL FEASIBILITY STUDY (MURRAY PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE); PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS: A Master Plan for Murray Park was prepared in February 2001 and was adopted by the City Commission. The completion of the new City of South Miami Community Center marked the completion of phase two of that Master Plan. One of the future phases includes a swimming pool. Subsequent to the adoption of the Master Plan, there was some discussion about the location of the pool with respect to the new center, the type of pool, the construction and operating costs. With assistance from Miami -Dade County Office of Community & Economic Development, we received funding for a swimming pool feasibility study. Via resolution number 103 -03- 11652, the City secured the services of MCHarry & Associates to perform the feasibility study. Since November of last year, MCHarry & Associates has been working on the study, which included several meetings with staff, meeting with the City's Ad Hoc Committee, individual meetings with Commission Members and two public workshops. As a result of these meetings, four final alternatives are presented in the report. Each proposed alternative is organized, in part, around the City's interest in capturing a meaningful playing field capable of hosting youth oriented field games at Murray Park. The options for the pool site have, therefore, been limited to the northwest and southwest corners of the site, preserving the largest possible open green space for this purpose. It is important to recognize that the full build -out of the park, as proposed, is significantly constrained by the limited amount of park property available. This report will be used as a tool to seek grant funding for the proposed pool. Page 2 of 2 May 31, 2004 Comm. Agenda RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Commission approve the resolution. ATTACHMENTS: ❑ Proposed resolution ❑ Resolution Number 103 -03 -11652 PUBLIC SWIMMING POOL FEASIBILITY STUDY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC SWIMMING POOL FEASIBILITY STUDY (MURRAY PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE); PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, as a result of community requests and completion of phase two of the City of South Miami Community Center (Multipurpose Center), it was necessary to update the Murray Park Master Plan; and WHEREAS, the City received $20,000 funding from Miami -Dade County Office of Community and Economic Development (OCED) to prepare a feasibility study (preliminary plans and cost estimate) for a proposed public swimming pool; and WHEREAS, Miami -Dade County and the City wish to provide for distribution of Surtax proceeds to the City according to the terms and conditions provided in the agreement; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Resolution number 103 -03- 11652, the City secured the services of MCHarry Associates to prepare the Public Swimming Pool Feasibility Study — Murray Park Master Plan Update. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1: That the Mayor and City Commission accept the Public Swimming Pool Feasibility Study - Murray Park Master Plan Update, reviewed and accepted during the second public workshop on April 29, 2004. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2004. APPROVED: ATTEST: Maria Menendez, City Clerk READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY Mary Scott Russell, Mayor Commission Vote: Mayor Russell: Vice Mayor Palmer: Commissioner Birts- Cooper: Commissioner Wiscombe: Commissioner Sherar: 1 2 5 6 7 9 l i} 1l 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1'9 20 21 22 23 24 25 2I+ 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42, 43 44 45 46 47 RESOLUTIO "i NO. 1 a3••a3 -t 3 65 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR°AND THE CIT'V COMMISSION OF THE C.r,.W OT SOUTH MIAMI APPROVING A PRt31T' ISSION,4 . SEFt' 14PES FEE OF ,xOT To EXCEED $20,000 (TWENTY THOUSAND) FOR. M CHARRY & ASSOCIATES FOR UPDATING THE MURRAY PARK MASTER PLAN AND TO PREPARE PRELIMINARY DESIGN AND COST ESTIMATES POET THEUR AY PARS POOR, AITTRORIZI NG THE DIRECTOR TO A'4,1313IRSE SAID IPUNDS F�M ACCOINT NUMBER 001-0000-115-70-43, ENTITLED OCED POOL DESIt 4; AND �PRQVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE BATE. WHEREAS, in February 2001 the City Commissi�)n adopted ithe 1• taster Ilan For Murray Park prepared. by MCHarry vd Associat ,s, and WHEREAS; as a result of subsequent commnr�ty" meetings €end tJ c Completion of the phase two of the 144ultipurpose Center, it is necc?sary to upd46 ,,he Mastr r Plan, and WHEREAS; the City desires to develop a set Of pnlirr:izj ar, plans and cost estimate for the Murray Park Pool, and WHEREAS; the City has received a funding of $20,00C.frorn kl iorni Dade Office of Co rimunity and Economic Development (OCED) to prepare prelin°;ury plans and cost estimates for the Murray Park Pool, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CIT" COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA; Section 1: The Director is authorized to proceed with the Vii.:, nivary plans and cast estimates for the Murray Park Pool and approve the professional fee or not to, xceed $20,000 for MCHarry and Associates Who iS}he- approve by OCED. Section 22: This resolution shall be effective upon approval PASSED AND ADOPTED dais ATTEST: 44zm CITY CLERK' 1 7tbay of june APPROVED: MAYOR . commissi otet READ AND APPROVED AS TO FOPdvi: M yor Fcliu: ,C:TTY "AT'TORNEY Vice Mayor Russ011: Commissioner Bejhel: Commissioner wi�cornbe: 4 _ y, "; YQa Yea Yea Commissioner My Crea: out of room �i F 3��'d •`Wd�F�E £0-`��-a�,t� `�1?E�E8��t3E �I4 "dt�IW Fi..��a �0 AI.I;� �48 .��V�S City of South Miami Public Works Department south miami A!C- AI�ICI'iCC� Cif(' 2001 Public Swimming Pool Feasibility Study Murray Park Master Plan Update Study Funded By: Miami -Dade County Office of Community and Economic Development FY 2003 Community Development Block Grant June 1, 2004 MCHARRYASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE / ENGINEERING / PLANNING 2780 SW DOUGLAS RD. SUITE 302 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 (305) 445 -3765 James W. Piersol, AIA Thomas M. Carlson, AIA AAC000988 ES0003663 Murray Park Master Plan Update City of South Miami Public Swimming Pool Feasibility Study Final Report Executive Summary May 10, 2004 The City of South Miami has, for many years, had a strong interest in making a public swimming pool part of the phased master plan for Murray Park. When added to the Phase 1 Hope Butler Center completed in 2001, and the Phase 2 Community Center completed in 2003, the proposed Phase 3 Aquatic Center would complete the build out of Murray Park, and provide the City with a consolidated community /recreation center combining a range of athletic and recreational activities with educational opportunities for South Miami's youth and adult population. With these interests in mind, the city engaged the services of MCHarry Associates to analyze the feasibility and implications of constructing a public pool on the Murray Park property. Initially, the study focused on broad -brush scope issues including tentative city interest in an enclosed pool; interactive water play facilities; an infant pool; and a public pool capable of hosting competitive swimming events. Over the course of several meetings with the city, and a public workshop, the scope of study was refined to a public pool and infant pool, only, to meet the City's commitment to offer a safe and secure public swimming pool environment for city residents and the community at large. The following graphic exhibits delineate four separate alternatives to the Murray Park master plan, adding a public pool facility and making related changes to both public parking and basketball hard -court locations. The proposed alternatives are the product of more than a dozen meetings conducted over several months with a variety of individuals representing neighborhood interests, the city commission, the community redevelopment agency, and the city's public works and parks and recreation departments. Each proposed alternative is organized, in part, around the city's interest in recapturing a meaningful playing field capable of hosting youth oriented field games at Murray Park. The options for siting the pool have, therefore, been limited to the northwest and southwest corners of the site, preserving the largest possible open green space for this purpose. It is important to recognize that the full build out of Murray Park, as proposed, is significantly constrained by the limited amount of park property available. Presentation and review of the various alternatives culminated with an April 29th Commission Workshop convened to solicit meaningful public comment and critique, and to achieve a consensus on which alternative best meets the City's goals and objectives. No definitive direction was identified in the workshop for implementing a Phase 3 Aquatic Center at Murray Park. A forthcoming commission meeting will be the venue in which the direction, necessary to initiate the City's process to solicit project funding, will be established. Special thanks to the City Commission & Administration members who participated in our one -on -one planning sessions to explore the numerous pool site option variations City of South Miami Commission Mary Scott Russell - Mayor Velma Palmer —Vice Mayor Craig Z. Sherar - Commissioner Marie Birts- Cooper — Commissioner Randy G. Wiscombe - Commissioner City of South Miami Administration Maria V. Davis - City Manager Earl Gallop - City Attorney Maria M. Menendez - City clerk Alan Rieke - Parks & Recreation Director Joe Gibson - Community Redevelopment Agency Director Ajibola Balogun - Public Works Director Rudy De La Torre - Building Superintendent We also wish to recognize the contributions from the following Consultants: Aquatic Design & Engineering, Inc. - Pool Design Kimley -Horn & Associates, Inc. - Civil Engineering -1- [Si ti m Id EAST. SIDEWALK -/ I souTIi ON—skEr P,viaNr —L 6 SW 6 8 T H S T R E E T Igm * m NED R ONED PR Ln a 7 C4 ---i CD I 7 N CD E3 L7, ; m to S M K X c Z G) cn > le � v 03 7 —I a/ I r rn � \ m � m y \i O / ( m m � I W a m S W 6 6 T H S T R E E T , LANDWE - 365D SF I - x NORTH c Q o -1 -4 1 ° ♦ = 1 `T= SDUTH o _ 'F m za I �, om it ri LJ o R rn D RS T N .At•ED P 1 I r I T I� �C -- � (n m )D to 4AM CD EXI5T SIDEWALK c - Z L - - - J • _ • • _ _ _• _J _ o �- WST, 5IDEWAU( i NEW I EXIST- 11 N m - _ - m - - -- _-°�� -mom' r ZONED �- - - 3Lf! 0 -- PROPERTY UNE; Ti ONED -� DUMP - NORTH c O X O G7'GJ �< O O Ivi 5� C " J 'A� v m n _ a - I Q rt 0 11 I A, 'I 1 N W Ct1 CO w SOUTH ON-STREEF PMNG = 6 5 W 6 8 T H S T R E E T ° i U3 Cn Co 3 --- I LOCKER WP It Nal rl 1 91 In >1 J4 --4 A -T L---- - - - - -- B t E A 0 H E R S 7 Lil 1 1 S W 6 6 T H S T R E E T It COPED PR emp Mm Ln > In r- m > o 0 MI M-- - ---- ----- -- — rn OF, MI M WPEPW 7PR -UN Lo r D BEACNERSIk4FlER NORTH DU MP Z o I'S 52 X, X, -u - II a -I II G7 G7 0 CD 0 --I Z :;o m 6 II II II C) 70 CD Mm 0 m E31 — L6 CD y � �� CL E3 SOUTH ON- STREET PARIONO = 5 SW 6 8 T H S T R E E T All SW 66TH STREET • Lj _ V z —I BLEACH 1 eQ_ x ' ��-— L--- -- r ---- -• I- -0 � PGOL DECK =8,000 5F em rn Ij j -I g rN Q y Z I m'' m u w N v D m I\ Ul MI -*-ARr /DRAFT �^ - NDN C" Wei K - MR SF J I rn r - -� � O - -_ GRA PRAPERTY UNE CI ONED L arncN�RS H - :_>ERS� - DUMP NORTH C3 ME C3 23 r ___ is I_ (n^ m� - -... I o i r* W g — M CD II-- I IQI CD m 9 CD - - - - y`4 CL T. SIDEWALK SOUTH ON— STREET PAWNG 6 FJ SW 68TH STREET -' S W 6 6 T H S T R E E T NEW CCV'D WALK 3,000 SF - MEMO 9WIN rn m C3 12 Wil-f- -fl F\ g F6 EXIST. SCENALX soum 0N- STREET PARKM - 6' S W 6 8 T H S T R E E T I IN rolCD6 RS i PR - - -D li rn WW I EXIST. A YJ GO ND 54 -'a CD rol li rn WW I EXIST. YJ ND �Unq 1 I Q 3O` m L ''I _ZqNLD - ZONED Ch Ln in _- -j rol li rn YJ �Unq PN - -- - --- _ZqNLD - ZONED _- NORTH >z e% \ \\ m C') CZ, K: C) 0 Co so co 41 Lw 0- rol TABLE OF CONTENTS City of South Miami Administration List Executive Summary 1 - 6 Table of Contents 7 ■ CONCLUSIONS OF STUDY Final Four Options 4 pgs' Predesign Cost Analysis 1 pg - Predesign Options and Maintenance Cost Analysis 1 pg ■ PREDESIGN CODE ANALYSIS Summary Zoning. Map 2 pgs Zoning Code Excerpts 8 pgs ' Civil Engineer Preliminary Findings 1 pg Public Swimming Pool Fixtures required Florida Building Code 1 pg ■ TECHNICAL DATA Summary Pool Design Guidelines 7 pgs "Graphic Standards" for Playing Fields & Basketball courts 2 pgs ■ APPENDED INFORMATION Appendix "N' Public Workshop #1 Dec -9 -03 presentation 3 pages Appendix "B" Public Workshop #2 Apr -29 -04 presentation 3 pages Appendix "C" Meeting Minutes Apr- 29 -04: Commissioner Workshop -' 9 pgs Apr- 22 -04: Pre- Commissioner Workshop 9 pgs Mar726 -04: Commissioners Wiscombe & Sherar 7 pgs Mar- 23 -04: Commissioner Birts - Cooper, & Vice Mayor Palmer 5 pgs Mar- 17 -04: Mayor Mary Scott Russel 4 pgs Mar- 15 -04: Ad Hoc Committee 4 pgs Mar -9 -04: Pre -Ad Hoc Committee 3 pgs Dec -9 -03 Work Shoo Meeting #1 3 pgs Nov- 11 -03: kick -off Meeting 1 pg � M- co�-Ac Y2 SP4CF4 $E!j F ia 1},0)0 � n4i .1n4i i 1 1 S W'S STN P LACE NE STSN -STS CET]♦ SPACES y Option 1— South Pool General Overview: This option locates the public pool facility in the southwest corner of the Murray Park site and northeast of the intersection of SW 581' Place and SW 681 Street. The pool is approximately 67' wide and 82' long and accommodates eight, 25 meter, swimming lanes. Pool operations are supported with a new, 3500 sf, freestanding building which houses toilet/shower /locker rooms as well as pool equipment and storage area. Vehicular Parking Implications: This option increases the minimum required on -site public parking count at Murray Park from 81 spaces to 133 spaces. Currently there are 100 spaces available at Murray Park. Accordingly, 33 new spaces must be added. This option is capable of adding only 28 new spaces, representing a shortfall of 5 spaces. If the city chooses to pursue this option, the parking shortfall must be addressed. It is important to note that the adjacent CRA/Mobley building is not part of the city's park property. As a consequence, the related 25 space parking lot cannot be factored into the number of spaces available to service the Murray Park demand for parking unless approved via a city variance. Playing Field Opportunities: This option creates an open field area 160' wide by 250' long. These are marginal field dimensions for field games because they do not accommodate the sideline green space prudent for youth soccer et aL Impact on Existing Park Facilities: In order to create the open field area described above, the two existing basketball hard courts must be demolished and reconstructed in the open area located between the Phase 1 Hope Butler Center and the Phase 2 Community Center. Predesign Construction Cost Analysis: $1.75 million onaa; u F9MY Option 1 South Pool it EXIST FPL SUB— TATION _ mrtnw OPTION-2 E A S r LOT - S O S P A L. D E S lE%STJ NORTH Pool • Altemate W gvpy Tot LM Loon_ Est.= ;1.914 y Murra y Park Pool Study Z. F I F, . .. b �� PPRICNG REQUIRED 133 o PARKING PROMDED - US MIMI SW 58TH PLACE EsT Ox- sTxEEr 3s sP c y SL > WHARR AS,7_ATF. I it Option 2 — North Pool Alternate A General Overview: This option locates the public pool facility on the northwest side of the Murray Park site between the Phase 1 Hope Butler Center and the Phase 2 Community Center. The pool is approximately 67' wide and 82' long and accommodates eight, 25 meter, swimming lanes. Pool operations are supported with a new, 2,600 sf, freestanding building which houses toilet/shower /locker rooms as well as a second, new, 900 sf pool equipment and storage building added to the westside of the Phase 2 building. Vehicular Parking Implications: This option increases the minimum required on -site public parking count at Murray Park from 81 spaces to 133 spaces. Currently there are 100 spaces available at Murray Park. Accordingly, 33 new spaces must be added. This option is capable of adding only 26 new spaces, if a landscape area is to be maintained separating the east parking lot from the playing field. With this layout, a shortfall of 7 spaces results. This shortfall can be overcome if 16 new spaces are added to the existing eastside parking lot similar to Option 1. It is important to note that the adjacent CRA/Mobley building is not part of the city's park property. As a consequence, the related 25 space parking lot cannot be factored into the number of spaces available to service the Murray Park demand for parking unless approved via a city variance. Playing Field Opportunities: This option creates an open field area 160' wide by 250' long. These are marginal field dimensions for field games because they do not accommodate the sideline green space prudent for youth soccer et al. Impact on Existing Park Facilities: In order to create the open field area described above, the two existing basketball hard courts must be demolished and reconstructed in the open area located in the southwest corner of the Murray Park property. Predesign Construction Cost Analysis: $1.86 million Option 2 North Pool Alternate -A 3 E %IST. FP L S U,(3- TAT I O N zo�n 8 8i .x x ..jg ? .... TIR -,_ ..� cASr sor -ss srzecspxsq @k 3 • ra [ r97k NORTH Pool -Aite ate'B- Rek—W Tnt tot - Eet=S1.9M ♦/sNS rac Murray Park Pool Study FrkARWNC RE URED 133 PARgNO PRONDEO t26 A � = za s:+no3 pm musz� w Ct 111[,7ill��e mWr�A= MSrI16 (nor) �N MFA — e,i7a SF y SW 5 8 7 H ,P LACE rnccr- y +f Option 3 — North Pool Alternate B General Overview: This option locates the public pool facility on the northwest side of the Murray Park site between the Phase 1 Hope Butler Center and the Phase 2 Community Center. The pool is approximately 67' wide and 82'iong and accommodates eight, 25 meter, swimming lanes. Pool operations are supported with a new, 2600 sf addition to the Phase 1 Hope Butler Center that will house toilet/shower /locker rooms. A second, new, 900 sf pool equipment and storage building is proposed to be added to the west side of the Phase 2 Community Center. Vehicular Parking Implications: This option increases the minimum required on -site public parking count at Murray Park from 81 spaces to 133 spaces. Currently there are 100 spaces available at Murray Park. Accordingly, 33 new spaces must be added. This option is capable of adding only 26 new spaces, resulting in a shortfall of 7 spaces results. If the city chooses to pursue this option, the parking shortfall must be addressed. It is important to note that the adjacent CRA/Mobley building is not part of the city's park property. As a consequence, the related 25 space parking lot cannot be factored into the number of spaces available to service the Murray Park demand for parking unless approved via a city variance. Playing Field Opportunities: This option creates an open field area 160' wide by 250' long. These are marginal field dimensions for field games because they do not accommodate the sideline green space prudent for youth soccer et al. Impact on Existing Park Facilities: In order to create the open field area described above, the two existing basketball hard courts must be demolished and reconstructed in the open area located in the southwest corner of the Murray Park property. Also, the proposed addition the Phase 1 building requires the Tot Lot to be relocated, in this option, to an area east of the playing fields and west of the eastside parking lot. Predesign Construction Cost Analysis: $1.88 million Option 3 North Pool Alternate - B 4f or OPTION - 4 NORTH Pool - Akemate "C" Assume & Demo Mobky Bldg. a/17/04 EsL Cwt— 82.2M 3//e u L Murray Park Pool Study PARKING REQUIRED = 133 PARKING PROMED s 144 a 3.4 3 ,{ f 5 W 5 8 T H P LA C E WEST ON- STREET -34 $1A.ES .,.r * .:..:y HARRYASSOC €Ac U Option 4 — North Pool Alternate C General Overview: This option locates-the public pool facility on the northwest side of the Murray Park site between the Phase 1 Hope Butler Center and the Phase 2 Community Center. The pool is approximately 67' wide and 82' long and accommodates eight, 25 meter, swimming lanes. Pool operations are supported with a new, 2600 sf addition to the Phase 1 Hope Butler Center that will house toilet/shower /locker rooms. A second, new, 900 sf pool equipment and storage building is proposed to be added to the west side of the Phase 2 Community Center. Vehicular Parking Implications: This option increases the minimum required on -site public parking count at Murray Park from 81 spaces to 133 spaces. Currently there are 100 spaces available at Murray Park. Accordingly, 33 new spaces must be added. This option is capable of adding 44 new spaces, exceeding the minimum requirement by 11 spaces. It is important to note that this option is predicated on city acquisition of the CRA/Mobley property, expanding the Murray Park site accordingly, demolishing the existing building, and using 25 space parking lotto meet a portion of the overall Murray Park vehicular parking requirement. Playing Field Opportunities: This, option creates an open field area 185' wide by 306' long. These are adequate field dimensions for field games because they do accommodate the sideline green space necessary for youth soccer et al. Impact on Existing Park Facilities: In order to achieve acceptable relationships among the various master plan elements, the two existing basketball hard courts must be demolished and reconstructed in an open area located on the west end of the park property. Also, the proposed addition to the Phase 1 building requires the Tot Lot to be relocated, in this option, to an area immediately south of the Phase 1 building. Predesign Construction Cost Analysis: $2.2 million Option 4 North Pool Alternate - C . PREDESIGN COST ANALYSIS ZK *Z 'U o D D 0 X W -1 O 0 O CO m •D 2 o .5 v !�. Z m m X 0 m A m Z m Z m V! W C W r 07 r Z m 'O O 'O O -- � p m D 0?_ z D m 3 r O * * m z m D m D O O CD ji C•Z y r c O O D o O D O D y r r y A C a n z 3 D y m 2 O D jN m 3 < $ m m D pOp m 0 r0 A m y y + o ° r CR O c m m E� m 000 2 =1 m ro m m� i D 1 1 v L ci m z m p m D 0 m c c Ln m m v m z g .1 D p m (�i) �. z m � 4i m Z -1 Ic "n O n T y Cb N m - C .71 C C. CD a (c m y o -4 n, i <n w w p N _i V O W O O O O O N C D O 3 � O r C C r C C U) !9 Cl) Cn r C C r C C in (9 (9 in 0 (9 (A (9 r C N C O 3� 3� -n T -n n 3a 3a T 'm -n -n fD T -n 3a . m n to to 69 69 m 0 O N O O n Vt !_fl 9 -1 O O O O ,0 69 l9 O -O O O 49 FA _ F9 69 N O O O O N EA 0 00 _ 0 O N Ut W (n O O N O A N O O 0 O O O y r (� c y -1 ^ O A N •a N .. GO A w <O O 4N N co N .a N O O O 0 O O � O O O 3 O O C C C C y y y y Cl) C cn V) (9 (9 (n (A (9 (9 C C y C 7 N 11 � 0 3 3 3 3 - -n - -n 3 -1 -n T m ; '° -n -n 3 3 c D z I -s N 0 M S (p f9 � f9 (9 69 vi 69 w 69 60 69 69 (9 40 6% 6s C A 0 0 o 00 D O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 o M m r y O O O N U1 W -� U1 O O (n -• O A N N O O O O N O O O N ° ;u 2 NO = 1 ., .... .. ,.. -.. �, .. ..,. , y.,.. z � O ? A m c A y Q a A O O y - yo D -1 D(A _ O = .-a d C y Q n cn N OD 4f N ,p W W 00 p N N f0 N A A s w A °o A N °o p s N °o O �. c c °O o °o c o° -'_ 3 0 o D w z C.r . O. r C C. (1) Cl) y y r C C cn (9 4) (9 (9 0) y (n C c 0) C_ it 3 33 333 -n -n -n -n 3 3 -n -n -n -n :° 0 -n -n 3 3 z0 fA i9 Hi 2 y O _r - xi.,:.. 'tom O O -- O 69 N w (11 •;. (9 W pi O O .....,, ,.. 69 N O fA A N (n O O O O N O 69 W O O' n N .-(ml Z. IN' �.�N y m C cr _ 3 xt" __: N Via. w z . Ch io .a a s "A W C O p O 01 O (4 (A71 O O N O p s M O O O a) N ti- 30 O p G 0 r C C r r C C C C (o Cl) CD (9 (9 r C co (9 (9 (9 U) (9 (n (n C C 00) C A 11 3 3 3 �3 3 3 -n -n -n T -n 3 T T -n -n O. O - -n 3 C .2.- z � tD 1 - O O N N 69 69 O : D O O O O o 69 E9 O !9 E9 tlt O N O !9 O O 1 O O O O O O K) o V 9 W O . -. N m ;Q � - -... .# Cl) m o m <_ n 0 Parks and Recreation Department Pool (001.5702.572) Acct. Proposed Proposed Description # Budget Budget Full Year Half Year F -T Salaries 12 -00 32,032 16,016 P -T Salaries 13 -00 68,068 42,094 Seasonal Salary 16 -00 Payroll Taxes 21 -00 8,008 4,649 Pension 22 -01 Medical Ins. 23 -00 3,000 Life AD &D 23 -07 Dental 23 -08 Vision 23 -09 Workers Comp. 24 -00 10,000 5,000 Unemp. Comp. 25 -00 Cont. Services 34 -00 Travel /Per Diem 40 -00 Telecom /Freight 41 -00 Telephone - Base 41 -01 Comm. Freight 41 -05 Utility Services (nat. gas) 43 -00 5,000 0 Natural gas Electricity 43 -01 7,000 4,000 Water 43 -02 5,000 3,000 Rental/Lease 44 -00 500 300 Rental /Lease /Equip. 44 -02 I.S.F. Fleet 45 -10 I.S.F. Comp. & Comm. 45 -20 I.S.F. Liability /Property Ins. 45 -30 6,500 3,500 Repair /Maint. 46 -00 7,500 4,500 Routine plumbing repairs Rep. & Maint. Bldg. 46 -01 Rep /Maint/Gen. Equip. 46 -03 Printing /Binding 47 -00 Promotions 48 -00 500 500 Summer public pool parties Promo /Rec. Fac. 48 -01 Office Supplies 51 -00 Oper. Supplies 52 -00 5,000 3,000 First aid, Red Cross, cleaning supplies. Uniforms 52 -03 1,500 1,500 Guard uniforms Chemicals 52 -06 10,000 6,000 Chlorine, CO2, etc. Dues /Membership 54 -00 FRPA Education/Training 58 -00 500 Improvement O/T Bldg. 63 -00 Machinery Improve. 64 -00 TOTAL 170,108 94,059 This information was provided by the City of South Miami for this report c�c&ys vs - SUMMARY Murray Park Pool Study Summary Predesign Code Analysis South Miami Land Development Code Zoning: The main body of the park property is zoned PR — Parks and Recreation District. A portion of the park property located west of the CRA/Mobley building and south of the existing basketball hard courts is zoned LO — Low Intensity Office District. A `physical fitness facility' (the proposed Phase 3 Aquatic Center) is permitted as a `special use' in an LO district. There are no conditions precluding a physical fitness center in a PR district. Dimensional Requirements: The South Miami Land Development Code does not establish any specific dimensional requirements for property zoned PR (location of Options 2, 3, and 4). Instead, the most stringent dimensional requirements of abutting property are to be used. Because this portion of the park property abuts an RS 4 District to the north, the following RS 4 — Small Lot Single Family Residential District dimensional requirements prevail: Minimum Setbacks: Front 25' Rear 25' Side (interior) 7.5' Side (street) 15' Maximum Building Height: 25' Maximum Impervious Coverage 45% Maximum Building Coverage 30% Property zoned LO (location of Option 1 - South Pool), must meet the following requirements relevant to this study: Minimum Setbacks: Front 20' Rear 15' Side (interior) 10' Side (street) 15' Between Buildings 20' Maximum Building Height: 30' Maximum Impervious Coverage 80% Maximum Floor Area Ratio 70% All four proposed options for locating a public swimming pool facility at Murray Park adhere to these constraints, as applicable. Parking Requirements: A physical fitness facility is required to provide one (1) space per three hundred square feet of gross floor area. Calculation of `gross square footage' for the proposed Phase 3 Aquatic Center includes the one story occupied building footprint, the pool deck, and the pool surface area. This area is approximately 15,600 sf for each Option, 1 thru 4. Accordingly, the minimum parking required for each option, as proposed, would be calculated as follows: 15,600 sf divided by 300 sf per parking space = 52 spaces Murray Park, as it exists today, requires 81 parking spaces; 100 spaces are currently provided, representing an excess of 19 spaces. The 52 required spaces identified above minus the 19 excess spaces equals a net additional parking space requirement of 33 spaces. Florida Building Code Toilet Fixture Requirements: A public swimming pool with a surface area from 5,001 sf to 7,500 sf requires the following toilet room fixture count: Women's Toilet Room: 9 water closets, and 3 lavatories Men's Toilet Room: 3 water closets, 3 urinals, and 3 lavatories Florida Administrative Code — Chapter 64E -9 Public Swimming Pools and Bathing Places: Maximum Pool Occupancy: The proposed Murray Park Pool has a surface area of approximately 5,250 sf, with an average depth of 4 feet. Pool volume is, therefore, approximately 21,000 cf, and equates to a water capacity of 157,000 gallons (7.481 gallons per cubic foot). Bathing load for conventional swimming pools is computed on the basis of one person per 5 gallons of recirculation flow per minute. The minimum pool turnover rate is 3 hours. 157,000 per 180 minutes = 872 gallons per minute. 872 gallons per minute divided by one person per 5 gpm = a maximum pool occupancy of 174 people. Rinse Showers: A minimum of one rinse shower shall be provided on the pool deck of all outdoor pools within 20 feet of the nearest pool water's edge. Wadina Pools: Wading pools shall have a minimum 10 foot wide deck around at least 50 percent of their perimeter with the remainder of the perimeter deck being at least 4 feet wide. There shall be at least 10 feet between adjacent swimming pools and wading pools. Department of Environmental Resource Management— DERM Water and Sewer: The proposed Pool Facility will generate both water and sewer impact fees. The sewage loading rate for ``Public Swimming Facilities ", as determined by both DERM and Miami - Dade WASA, is 10 GPD (gallons per day per person); and for "Parks with Showers/Toilets ", 20 GPD per person. The total number of gallons would be calculated based on the user capacity for these facilities. ®� �... IL _ INUM FREB �® ��•:• } �Ef:tN• kt�tgtl ,� �� ► IIIIEjEEeeg6:Qa�� 1 i s t s , IRAN t'�c�7i111 HIM �iON�hieiili� �..�;., AFA ��,_.�r►{�i� fir: '�e1��1��III�tN'.�`�� °~�� if UA nli� II!i� � 1l M11 (ltl�i� Ili I d uroliir i ' a' n r� ��'�� _1 � • ��II i�,;IId�II it nllnllll ,°-� �� ad�lB�I��i�ll 'I(11II��11��111111Gi�� . 0 HIM I ryennumrni m , iu+ennui9i } ` ��i��6�� `�► 0 �` ��''� ' ' I ��` � I � I' fill, m{ nl I�j+ II� iy1(nN 'II IN� },r� �w�'�j �' _ �'�'�� 7 -4 IN''� +��'uil �,f 1I�Illllllli�t��Ifli�tli�i '�,'Nlr��f]Ig1�II�HIi l �fll' �) I@ 1N1lJ�Illl111i�!li�t51✓Nl1i��.. �'9't °r ®' I I r 91NII I� IIII 1`1glNlgll "'llgl Ilq' 1111NII! qq � OIc'� 'ggli j '�Z,�•t1� �, l uu ICI 1, i�helu� II� i 41,,II q�;Elrygl umll�r i ; .q I��'r ql� ' MIN �` ` � " �..�r �� •' � �� r •� � y, I �j;i tl }ili "! w nuu i �IN , ;aiiiertru r'.r u � tl '! itu Ip � i �! �4,,�o INNdiI NNNIP;,I,igIII11NNlll, � �II�' i �uliilHllillitrlfl! ��Njalgl!q ;I nlp 1!illUNrlliilll�N�l�1ir� lt, i �°r'► ry � � , it q� i�I11��I�I�IIII�IIIPigll f 1;!I,� IIIINii�ii�, �Nllli 1111 1111!!r �ni r�l) 11J� I�fIN �lli "� Ilpl I��I�"ru�� iGl hl 11111 ;� �I�liii q' ! II, , i r ur ifrl NI llfll, FI�iHrtillf!!I!�'!IIIII Igi'�,�HflIIII!'C9iHt INNI�IIIiHJkIC;�RII; qll nl 111113,IElIII11�,JlIII ;ICI, [ IIINfb� "IIpiI:;I lVlliYanlgl'dlll lnE4�*!_' ° l�li,, illlh'�I�IiIIII Il��IIINI �CI ® M �' ' �6 ppq'I �' ;I�,fa :�q �!!. !1 , II liti glll 1��, „!I �Iq!! ' INICIJglllillh!!HIIi 'I�I!,kllillllgl,!!Ilglf "' Iql ! gIIIIIL'igq .. •- ,+; �` �NIIIIIII�NIiI' �( liiIll�i��llllil�d�11�! �ll��l' �IIII. { I((( I{ �gl( II[f lf` iilllll� ' °IIII;I'NgIIIIIIIif;IINh NIfC�ilfgl( IHiliilllq��IIN (i „''IHI(Igq "iigNi al (VIII i I Jill iu� I+ jllil!Iil, 1 N1 `P l► I i ' Igli ! I ! III 6; a liui� (�i►> II i I it �� Vii;.. HIM I ryennumrni m , iu+ennui9i } ` ��i��6�� `�► 0 �` ��''� ' ' I ��` � I � I' fill, m{ nl I�j+ II� iy1(nN 'II IN� },r� �w�'�j �' _ �'�'�� 7 -4 IN''� +��'uil �,f 1I�Illllllli�t��Ifli�tli�i '�,'Nlr��f]Ig1�II�HIi l �fll' �) I@ 1N1lJ�Illl111i�!li�t51✓Nl1i��.. �'9't °r ®' I I r 91NII I� IIII 1`1glNlgll "'llgl Ilq' 1111NII! qq � OIc'� 'ggli j '�Z,�•t1� �, l uu ICI 1, i�helu� II� i 41,,II q�;Elrygl umll�r i ; .q I��'r ql� ' MIN �` ` � " �..�r �� •' � �� r •� � y, I �j;i tl }ili "! w nuu i �IN , ;aiiiertru r'.r u � tl '! itu Ip � i �! �4,,�o INNdiI NNNIP;,I,igIII11NNlll, � �II�' i �uliilHllillitrlfl! ��Njalgl!q ;I nlp 1!illUNrlliilll�N�l�1ir� lt, i �°r'► ry � � , it q� i�I11��I�I�IIII�IIIPigll f 1;!I,� IIIINii�ii�, �Nllli 1111 1111!!r �ni r�l) 11J� I�fIN �lli "� Ilpl I��I�"ru�� iGl hl 11111 ;� �I�liii q' ! II, , i r ur ifrl NI llfll, FI�iHrtillf!!I!�'!IIIII Igi'�,�HflIIII!'C9iHt INNI�IIIiHJkIC;�RII; qll nl 111113,IElIII11�,JlIII ;ICI, [ IIINfb� "IIpiI:;I lVlliYanlgl'dlll lnE4�*!_' ° l�li,, illlh'�I�IiIIII Il��IIINI �CI ® M �' ' �6 ppq'I �' ;I�,fa :�q �!!. !1 , II liti glll 1��, „!I �Iq!! ' INICIJglllillh!!HIIi 'I�I!,kllillllgl,!!Ilglf "' Iql ! gIIIIIL'igq .. •- ,+; �` �NIIIIIII�NIiI' �( liiIll�i��llllil�d�11�! �ll��l' �IIII. { I((( I{ �gl( II[f lf` iilllll� ' °IIII;I'NgIIIIIIIif;IINh NIfC�ilfgl( IHiliilllq��IIN (i „''IHI(Igq "iigNi al (VIII i I Jill iu� I+ jllil!Iil, 1 N1 `P l► I i ' Igli ! I ! III 6; a liui� (�i►> II i I it �� Vii;.. ME] SOUTH MAIMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ZONING CODE EXCERPTS OTHER REGULATIONS 20-4.4 (M) Coinputations. The 'following principles shall control the-computation of sign area and sign height: (1) t'Computation of Area of Individual Signs. The area of a sign shall be computed by `-means of the smallest square, circle, rectangle, triangle, or combination thereof that will encompass -the extreme limits of the sign content,: together with any material or color forming an integral part of the background of the display or used to differentiate the sign from the backdrop or structure against which it is placed, but not including any supporting structure clearly incidental to the display itself or any other .clearly incidental decorative element; (2) Computation ofArea of Multi faced Signs.. The sign area for a sign with more than one face shall be computed by adding together the area of all sign faces visible from any one point. When two identical sign faces are placed back W back; so that both faces cannot be viewed from any point at the same -time, and when such sign faces are part of the same sign structure and are not more than 3 feet apart, the sign area shall be computed by the measurement of one of the faces; and (3) Computation of Height. The height of a sign shall be computed as the distance from grade as defined in this Code to`the top of the highest component of the sign or . supporting structure. - (Ord. No. 1 -91- 1466,1- 15 -91; Ord. No. 9- 92- 1504, 5-19-92; Ord No. 4 -93 -1533, 6-1-:94; Ord. No. 18 -93- 1544, §§ 2, 3, 11- 16 -93; Ord. No. 19 -96 -1619, § 1, 10 -1 -96; Ord. No. 6 -98- 1654, § 3, 4- 21 -98; Ord. No. '9 -99 -1683, §§ 2, 3; 5- 4 -99)'` 20 -44 Off- street parking requirements. (A) Applicability..' All, structures, and uses which are erected, established or enlarged within the city shall provide adequate off-street parking spaces and control mechanisms for on -site vehicular and pedestrian traffic in order to insure the safety and convenience of the public pursuant to the requirements of this section.. (1)' On- street "parkuigspaces adjacent to a'lot shall count toward the'parking requirements set forth below in subsection (B) for that lot ;' a partial space longer than eleven (11) feet shall count as a full space . mp d rig -of -wa d' ent to business property in commercial zoning dis maybe improved by the abutting property owner for credit as on- street parking spaces by written application to the City Manager. On- street parking spaces may be assigned and credited to other properties within 1,500 feet of any on- street parking space by written consent of the property owner to whose property the space is currently credited with the written consent and approval of the City Manager. The City Manager will determine if the installation' of parking meters,is merited and appropriate for the area. Supp. No. 5 93 ZONING REGULATIONS 20 -3.3 C)OZq .`cq �' p.02A ago ax ...: a a, a� - w�wraa' aaa tioAAwx a a h :oAAw� ,oAAa 1.41:4Ma aaa a tioA "A .ate <aaa w a a Ah.oAAaw >a;waa tioAAb_to wwa a a a H:0A,94 .�Z) X6 wawa H a P., P-1 q a` w a - H�aaa auwaaa� a opq w awN a o aaa 4: Now °�n p .1 P-4 aaa LV xoa a a �o aaa ��►� a' r F r h P-i . P4, gin:. a, w x cq a 5 0 ' o a zz 04 ° 2 a a ul 1-4 �•�o� ' C,� - awe ° w� `nib w' P4 co AAa�x' a rn M Supp. No.7 30.1 cn 17171 O n Ll Ll. FLORIDA BUILDING CODE PUBLIC SWIMMING POOL FIXTURES REQUIRED • e • • • • • r� Size of Pool Men's Restroom Women's Restroom Urinals WC Lavatory WC Lavato 0— 2500 sq ft 1 1 1 1 I- 2501— 5000 sq ft 2 2 2 6 2 5001- 7500 s ft 3 3 :. 3 9 3 7501 - 10;000 s ft 4 _ 4 4 -12 q a • • • • • • An additional set of fixtures shall be provided in the'men's restroom for every 5,000 square feet or major fraction thereof for pools greater than 10,000 square feet. Women's restrooms shall have a'ratio of 3 to 2 water closets provided for women to the 0 combined total of water closets and urinals provided for men. •. e • 424.1.6.1.2 Outside Access. Outside access toL and approved using the ANSI/NSF International facilities shall be provided for bathers at outdoor Standard 50 -1996, Circulation System Components • pools. If they, are not visible from any portion of the and Related Materials for Swimming Pool, Spas/Hot e pool deck, signs shall be posted showing directions Tubs, dated October 28, 1996, which is incorporated • to the facilities. Directions shall be legible from any by reference.. portion of the pool deck; letters shall be a minimum e of 1 inch high. 424.1.6.5.2 Volume. The recirculation system shall be designed to provide a minimum of four turnovers • • 424.1.6.1.3 Sanitary Facility Floors. Floors of of the pool volume per day. Pools that are less than • sanitary facility shall be constructed of concrete or 1000 square feet at health clubs shall be required to °• • other nonabsorbent materials,'shall have a smooth provide eight turnovers per day. • slip resistant finish and shall slope to floor drains. • • Carpets, duckboards and footbaths are prohibited. L 424.1.6.5.3 System Design: The .design pattern of The intersection between'the floor and walls shall recirculation flow shall be 100 percent through the be covered. main drain piping and 100 percent 'through the, • perimeter overflow system or 60 percent through • 424.1.6.1.4 Hose Bibb. A hose bibb with vacuum the skimmer system. • breaker shall be provided, near each restroom to • • allow for ease of cleaning. 424.1.65.3.1 Perimeter overflow gutters., The lip of the gutter shall b uniformly level with a maxi= 424.1.6.2 Rinse Shower. A minimum of one rinse mum tolerance of 1/a inch between the hi and low 0i,.... _• shower shall be provided on the pool, deck of all out- areas. The bottom of the gutter shall be level or slope • door pools within 20 feet of the nearest pool water's to the drains. The spacing between drains shall not • edge. exceed 10 feet for 2 -inch drains or L15 feet for 21h- • • inch drains, unless hydraulically ; justified by the • 424.1.6.3 Cross- connection Prevention. L An atmos- design engineer. e pheric break or approved back flow prevention device • • shall be provided in each pool water supply line that is 424.1.6.5.3.1.1 Either recessed type or open • connected to a public water supply. Vacuum breakers type gutters shall be used. Special designs can • shall be installed on all hose bibbs. be approved provided they are within limits of • sound engineering practice. , Recessed type • 424.1.6.4 Plastic Pipes. Plastic pipe subject to a peri- gutters .shall be at least 4 inches deep and 4 • • od of prolonged sunlight exposure shall be coated to inches Lwide. L No part of the recessed gutter protect it from ultraviolet light degradation. shall be visible from a position directly above • • the gutter sighting vertically down the edge of • 424.1.6.5 Recirculation and Treatment Systems the deck or curb. Open type gutters shall be at ; • 424.1.6.5.1 Equipment Testing. Recirculation and least 6 inches deep and 12 inches wide. The • treatment equipment such as filters, recessed automat- gutter shall slope 2 inches, ± 1/a inch, from the • • urface skimmers, ionizers, oione generators, disin- lip to th(- drains. The gutter drains- -shall be . • fection feeders and chlorine generators shall be tested located at the deepest part of the gutter. , • • ,f 28 FL®RMA BUILDING CODE — BU[LbiigG , H> 11,, -i Murray Park Pool Study Summary Technical Data The following collection of data summarizes a variety of technical issues relevant to the development.of a public swimming pool facility at Murray Park. Public Pool Facility: The final 4 options identified in this study are each predicated on a combined pool and pool deck area of approximately 12,000 A The pool configuration selected for Murray Park is 25 meters (82') long and 67 feet wide, or approximately 5,500 A A pool of this size will accommodate measured lap swimming and /or competitive swimming events; and a deck area of approximately 6,500 sf for related poolside activity. Support Spaces: Public Pools will require toilet/shower /locker /changing facilities to meet current Public Health Codes. It is estimated that this can be achieved in an area of approximately 2600 sf. The toilet room fixture count must meet the Florida Building Code. Mechanical Pump Room and chemical storage area — 600sf. Peripherals equipment storage — 300 sf. Mechanical and electrical pool equipment can be housed in buildings adjacent to the pool chemical storage room if properly ventilated. A fire separation is required between equipment and chemical storage areas. Pool equipment needs sufficient electrical supply, these need to be determined for the project. Pool Sanitation: Liquid chlorine may be the best alternative for pool chemistry. It is the most commonly used sanitizing agent in pools of this type because of safety and cost control Delivery of pool chemicals will most likely be by truck, vehicular access for this purpose should be easy and efficient. Pool drainage to sewer or storm water system needs to be analyzed. Infant (ftding) Pool: y A 10 x 10' pool, 12" deep, with related services, will cost approximately construction $40,000.00 (Includes pool, equipment and minimal deck areas). Accessibility / Occupancy: A pool of 5,400 sf will require 2 accessible entries (1 per 300 If. of perimeter).. An infant pool (10'x 10') will require 1 accessible entry Occupancy calculations are based on the rate of fresh water returned to the pool every 5 minutes. Our design basis allows for 175 persons in the "public" pool. Pool Enclosure and Peripheral Devices: A prefabricated pool enclosure to span the width of the pool and deck areas, approximately 12,000 sf, (not including sidewalls, foundation, electrical or mechanical) will cost $70 /sf, or approximately, $840,000.00 based on a manufacturer that has M -D County product approvaL After some research, a pool cover that acts as a security device preventing access to the water, has not been found that will cover a 5,400sf pool. Covers in this range have been designed for thermal" and weather, resistance only. For the purpose of this study, perimeter security fencing has been included in the project scope for security control. Inlaid tile lane markers and tile around the waterline of the pool are considered best options with cost control in mind. Pool peripheral devices may include: Cleaning Equipment Lane reels Starting Block accessories Buoy's and floats Pool heating equipment has not been. included in the predesign cost analyses. Pool Finishes: A "Marbletite" interior pool finish is considered the most practical and offers a 10 to 15 year warranty. POOL DESIGN GUIDELINES 584 25 Yard Swimming Pool: Capacity Formulas LENGTH OF POOLS WIDTH OF POOLS NOTES 25 yards is the minimum length for American records, Drawing below shows 7 ft lanes with pool width of 45 Gutters at sides of pool are desirable to reduce wave and meets interscholastic and intercollegiate require- It (6 lanes). Strictly competitive pools should have 8 ft action in swimming meets or water polo. See lighting ments. (Pool should be 75 ft -11/2 in, long to allow for lanes, with pool width of 83 ft (10 lanes). Minimum standards and diving board standards on other pages of -- electronic timing panels at one end.) widths include additional 18 in. width outside lanes on this series for additional requirements for competitive both sides of pool. pools. andards for international competition are shown on 50 ZONE C meter pool page. NON- SWIMMERS POOL DECK . I I METER I' -6" OUTSIDE LANES ON BOTH - 10' RECOMMENDED - SIDES OF POOL W MINIMUM DIFFERENT DECK - I._6.. EDGES AND GUTTERS 0 I -- — --— - Y-'f- — — 0 20'RECOMMENDED 5' -O" BLACK TILE LANE MARKINGS - (1.0" MIN. WIDTH) O 3 METER BOARD— DRAIN REMOVABLE — — FLOATING LANE — — — — — — — — — — — — I METER BOARD DIVIDERS 0 0 I 75'— . I V2" PLAN MIN.LENGTH (AMERICAN RECORDS) SEE STANDARDS FOR DIVING FACILITIES ON ANOTHER PAGE OF THIS SERIES WATER LEVEL 2'— 6" GRAB BARS AND RECESSED STEPS 2' RACING TAKEOFFS 30 "ABOVE WATER LEVEL (SEE ANOTHER PAGE FOR DETAILS) N 0 W W Z Z a a J J � O 0 0 1 I in ro It m 4 -0"MIN. (NCAA ANDUSS.) PITCH NOT OVER I' IN 12'- LONGITUDINAL SECTION 25 YARD POOL Swimming pool capacity requirements vary from one locality to another: check local regulations. The following is suggested by the American Public Health. Association. ZONE C NON- SWIMMERS FORMULA ZONE A Diving area defined by 10 ft radius from diving board or platform. - - DERIVATION 12 divers per board; 2 -3 in water, the rest on shore. Or allow 300 sq ft of pool water surface per board. ZONE B ZONE B Swimming area; 24 sq ft.per swimmer. Based on volume displaced by each swimmer SWIMMERS ( °/s square of average ht) and adjusted by the number of swimmers using pool at one time (2 /a total swimmers). ZONE C Nonswimmer area. 10 sq ft per person. Based on volume displaced by person (1/2 area ZONE A allowed per swimmer) and adjusted by number not using water -50% (in some pools with DIVERS large number of nonswimmers, figure may be as high as 75 %). FORMULA- Max. pool No. diving boards Area Zone B Area Zone C = capacity 12 x or platforms + 24 + 10 PUBLIC SWIMMING POOL CAPACITY R. Jackson Smith, AIA; Designed Environments, Inc.; Stamford, Connecticut MURRAY PARK Preliminary Utility Requirements for Pool Pipe Size: Pressure (PSI): 60 Expected backwash flow (gpm): 300 Type of flow: Gravity Recommended air gap distance (in.): 12 Expected power phase 3 Expected power voltage 208 Anticipated F.L.A. 195.2 Includes amp loads for: Pool pumps Pool underwater lighting Chemical systems Heater controls 25 amps "extra" due to preliminary nature of info Does NOT include amp loads for: Deck illumination Utilities for equipment room Filtration Room: Recommended air turnover rate (minutes): 6 Chemical Storage Room: Recommended air turnover rate (minutes): 6 Combustion air design for heaters (by HVAC Engineer): Required Main pool heater vent size: 12 Ventilation / Ducting for heaters (by HVAC Engineer): Required Pool Heater Sizing: BTU's: 1,440 Gas Connection Size (inch): 2.00 Aquatic Design & Engineering, Inc. Prepared by Ken Martin 1/28/2004 El VW,WICATIONS RUAKOOUM "I'll I'll, � I � tll'll WOMMOMMACM-MMLI So NOW oj I I " " i e - EM i Structures Unlimited, Inc. Translucent Skylights, Natatoriums / Pool Enclosures, Buildi... Page 1 of 2 Natatoriums J Pooh Enclosures Sweets 131231131501STR Swimming pool areas are highly demanding environments prone to structural, maintenance and even health and safety concerns. Structures Unlimited, Inca provides proven solutions and peace of mind as a single source provider of custom designed enclosures. Manufactured in the USA. Features • Corrosion resistant finish • Motorized operable roof allows up to 40% of the roof to open • Fixed walls or sliding glass doors Thermally Broken System: The Ultimate Performance and Condensation Control. • Insulation values up to R -46 • Perfect lighting control • Maximum condensation control • Maximum thermal efficiency Aluminum Structural Framing • Factory pre- finished • Hollow box beam can conceal wiring • Internal gussets • Truss designs • Standard roof styles include: gable, hip, she ridge http:// www. structuresunlimitedinc .com/natatoriums.htm 2/2/2004 DIMENSIONS FOR PLAYING FIELDS AND BASKETBALL COURTS GRAPHIC STANDARDS i-ootnan: Kegular, Six - Man, Gaelic and Hurling, Soccer, Rugby; Lacrosse 30' O"' - 30' O" - - .; 24V-0" N N I It 6 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 W 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 6 FOOTBALL PROFESSIONAL GOAL BEST N — J - SCALE ptsh2Or POST ON GOAL LINE ORIENTATION SIX —MAN FOOTBALL SCALE 1" ■ 120' 140 - 160 YDS 4 -- SO YDS.(GAEL. FO TBALL ONLY) - 70YDS.(HURLING ONLY) 21 YDS 14 YDS. N N 0 a 0 F 0 Z I- 0 Q } O 0 _ 1 W d Q m } V :LIC FOOTBALL 8m HURLING FIELD SYDS. - - : 360 �O MAX. (RECOM) 330 Q MIN. 16 -0.. 12. -0.. - - CORNER FLAGS - V- O" HIGH Z HALFWAY LINE E O) - PENALTY O :KICK MARK.W 0 O O a (r 1 I X RAD Z - GOAL - - - _d .. AREA - lV" GOAL LINE -. - :TOUCH -LINE - CORNER KICK AREA 60CCER 6CALE +:1 "x120' _ ;< NO SCALE This information is for preliminary planning and design only. For final layouts and design investigate current rules and regulations of the athletic organization or other authority whose standards will govern. Charles F. D. Egbert, AIA; Architect; Washington, D. C. 3 YDS - ow - I -SIDE LINE IN BOUNDS LINE o 0 G IN BOUNDS" LINE - WJ 0 / GOAL LINE - W (f0 J1 }Z I f J It I� m I I I b.0 MJ I J J I 0 Z IW O ZO N/ - WN W - I Q Z/12 i6 1 W I 0 N I I 0 - O 5 10 16 20 25 30 35 40 45 SO 4S 40 35 30 25 20 IS 10 S 0 N N I It 6 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 W 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 6 FOOTBALL PROFESSIONAL GOAL BEST N — J - SCALE ptsh2Or POST ON GOAL LINE ORIENTATION SIX —MAN FOOTBALL SCALE 1" ■ 120' 140 - 160 YDS 4 -- SO YDS.(GAEL. FO TBALL ONLY) - 70YDS.(HURLING ONLY) 21 YDS 14 YDS. N N 0 a 0 F 0 Z I- 0 Q } O 0 _ 1 W d Q m } V :LIC FOOTBALL 8m HURLING FIELD SYDS. - - : 360 �O MAX. (RECOM) 330 Q MIN. 16 -0.. 12. -0.. - - CORNER FLAGS - V- O" HIGH Z HALFWAY LINE E O) - PENALTY O :KICK MARK.W 0 O O a (r 1 I X RAD Z - GOAL - - - _d .. AREA - lV" GOAL LINE -. - :TOUCH -LINE - CORNER KICK AREA 60CCER 6CALE +:1 "x120' _ ;< NO SCALE This information is for preliminary planning and design only. For final layouts and design investigate current rules and regulations of the athletic organization or other authority whose standards will govern. Charles F. D. Egbert, AIA; Architect; Washington, D. C. SIDE LINE - ow - I IN BOUNDS LINE o 0 G - WJ GOAL LINE - f It I I FOOTBALL PROFESSIONAL GOAL BEST N — J - SCALE ptsh2Or POST ON GOAL LINE ORIENTATION SIX —MAN FOOTBALL SCALE 1" ■ 120' 140 - 160 YDS 4 -- SO YDS.(GAEL. FO TBALL ONLY) - 70YDS.(HURLING ONLY) 21 YDS 14 YDS. N N 0 a 0 F 0 Z I- 0 Q } O 0 _ 1 W d Q m } V :LIC FOOTBALL 8m HURLING FIELD SYDS. - - : 360 �O MAX. (RECOM) 330 Q MIN. 16 -0.. 12. -0.. - - CORNER FLAGS - V- O" HIGH Z HALFWAY LINE E O) - PENALTY O :KICK MARK.W 0 O O a (r 1 I X RAD Z - GOAL - - - _d .. AREA - lV" GOAL LINE -. - :TOUCH -LINE - CORNER KICK AREA 60CCER 6CALE +:1 "x120' _ ;< NO SCALE This information is for preliminary planning and design only. For final layouts and design investigate current rules and regulations of the athletic organization or other authority whose standards will govern. Charles F. D. Egbert, AIA; Architect; Washington, D. C. - - : 360 �O MAX. (RECOM) 330 Q MIN. 16 -0.. 12. -0.. - - CORNER FLAGS - V- O" HIGH Z HALFWAY LINE E O) - PENALTY O :KICK MARK.W 0 O O a (r 1 I X RAD Z - GOAL - - - _d .. AREA - lV" GOAL LINE -. - :TOUCH -LINE - CORNER KICK AREA 60CCER 6CALE +:1 "x120' _ ;< NO SCALE This information is for preliminary planning and design only. For final layouts and design investigate current rules and regulations of the athletic organization or other authority whose standards will govern. Charles F. D. Egbert, AIA; Architect; Washington, D. C. NO SCALE This information is for preliminary planning and design only. For final layouts and design investigate current rules and regulations of the athletic organization or other authority whose standards will govern. Charles F. D. Egbert, AIA; Architect; Washington, D. C. E 6'-6" 1�_,�,_,L 2�2 O - .. . SHORT SERVICE LINE, POST NET;. 1 4" Mut LL. (J bD 5' -O" BETWEEN COURTS p 1 w (_ .. { I _ NET DZa CEILING . M I .. �q0 20' MIN. LINED FOR BOTH I NOTEc F,JI- m DOUBLES. AND ALL LINES Q ARE 2 Zmd SINGLES ALL ? ' ..N LINES. ; . IV2' WIDE. I WIDE 0 .,'., .. (L - .. . - iD I 3 MIN. POST / 4 MAX ... L BACK BOUND. LINE SIDE BOUND. LINE SINGLES - L_'_ -�- -- _----' - ^-^--' -- ^ y SIDE BOUND. LINE DOUBLES VOLLEY BALL BADMINTON—MEN 8a WOMEN SCALE 1 "= 32' -O" SCALE I" = 32' -�O" - NOTE: U.S. Volley Ball Association dimensions for unofficial gi Court may be varied to suit players. (for children and the . -WALL LINE I - + agile). Min. clearance W— 0". See page on women s1 ^' TABLE - 1 U `FRONT OF - . = 0 CHAIRS DIMENSIONS FOR BILLIARDS 8e POCKET ' z:1 BILLIARDS PLAYING TABLE - BASKET- IB" DIAMETER •„r - SURFACE`- SIZE B' HEIGHT ELEMENT. SCH. U-_ _ PLAYING _ -TYPE OF TABLE - W. L. W. 9' HEIGHT JUNIOR H.S. - L. 10' HEIGHT H.S. 6 COLLEGE SURFACE . .. - i ENGLISH (SNOOKER) 6' -0 :' 12' -0" 6' -9° 12' -9" ` �- _ W ADJ. STANDARD POOL OR BILL. 5 -O" IO-U' 5' -9" IV-0" - TABLE STANDARD POOL OR BILL. 4'-6" 9' -O" 5' -3" OUTDO 9' -9" - 20' TO lJ STANDARD POOL OR BILL 4 O" H =QS' 4 9" B' -9" INDOOF is, TO ' .- ...... _ .. m Q JUNIOR POOL „ .. 3, -6.. 7._O.. 4_3... 7'-9" .. JUNIOR POOL 6' -O " 3' -9" 6' -9" O TABLE HEIGHT 2' -6" •t I12 RADI ^" r OF COL -01, MIN.. -TABL ..SIZE S' -V" MIN. - - 4' RADII ' BILLIARD$ a POCKET' .BILLIARDS ( POOL) NO SCALE . -. ". GOAL -H! COURT '_ SCALE I" = 32" NOTE This information is for preliminary and design only. For final layouts design planning ftV will govern. and investigate current rules and regulations of the athletic organization or other authority whose stan Charles F D Egbert, AIA; Architect; Washington, D. C. IN �P�c�C1c \�ci ��c��c��c�� -��r� APPENDIX "A" PUBLIC WORKSHOP #1 DEC -9 -03 PRESENTATION MURRAY PARK ^ACHARRYA c IAT - Architecture /Engineering /Planning VIEW FROM NORTH VIEW FROM SOUTH ICHARRYA SO IAT ES- Architecture /Engineering /Planning 1, EXISTING SCHEME VIEW FROM WEST HARRYASS IAA° m Architecture /Engineering /Planning VIEW FROM EAST 9 HARRYA O IAT - Architecture /Engineering /Planning , PREVIOUSLY PROPOSED SCHEME HARRYASSOCI T - Architecture/Engineering/Planning :t MCHARRYA IA " w CURRENTLY APPROVED SCHEME f 4 E PACHARRYAS IATES- Architecture /Engineering /Planning STUDY SCHEME "B" M CHAR RYA S SO C IAAT ES - Architecture /Engineering /Planning ,h Options For Water Activity Area: Interactive Water Features STUDY SCHEME "A" M HARRYA IA i E m Options For Water Activity Area: Public Pool (Multi- activity) r4 HARRYA O IAATES- Options For Water Activity Area: Infant / Wading Pool M HARRY SS I T - Architecture /Engineering/Planning ' ® ¢i HARRYA IA " - Options For Water Activity Area: Competition Style Pool i 7 f#ICHARRYASSOCIA T - ArchitecturelEngineering /Planning Study Focus: " Type of water related activity desired: - Interactive water feature - Wading pool • Public (Multi- activity pool) - Competition style pool - Pool Combinations — (Interactive / Wading, etc.) * Location and type of Showers and pool services required by public health codes for the facility. Best mechanical, electrical and chemical systems to be used * Best option: Open -air or enclosed environment * Provide estimates for the selected schemes NACHARRY O 4 T - Architecture /Engineering /Planning Research Possibility of Indoor Activities 'ICHARRY, IA T E - ArchitecturelEngineering /Planning M ARRAY PARK MCHARRYASSOCIATES- Architecture /Engineering /Planning EXISTING SCHEME f} BC HARRY ASSOCIATES-Architecture[EngineeringIPlanning STUDYSCHEME B' MCHARRYASSOCIATES- VIEW FROM WEST MCHARRYASSOCIATES- STUDY SCHEME 'A" R4CHARRYASSOCIATES- Architecture/Engineering/Planning Research Possibility of Indoor Activities IARRYASSOCIATES- Architecture/Enaineerine/Plannin \\J Murray Park Master Plan Update Murray Park Master Plan Upd City of South Miami Public Pool Fewlbllky story City of South Miami Public Pool Feublaty Study City of South Miami Murray Park Master Plan Update Publk Pool Feaslb0ily Shely L Murray Park Master Plan Update City Of South Miami Publk P- 1F —P.Iny SWdy City of South Miami Publk Pool Feasibility SWdy APPENDIX "C" MEETING MINUTES MCHARRYASSOCIATES MEETING MINUTES Date: 4/29/2004 6:30pm Project: Murray Park Master Plan Update Re`. Commissioner Workshop Meeting Project Phase: Murray Park Pool Feasibility Study Location: City Commission Chambers Written by: David Aguirre -Wong, MCHarry Associates Attendees Company Tel. /Fax Mary Scott Russel Mayor Velma Palmer Vice -Mayor Craig Sherar Commissioner Maria Davis City Manager Maria M. Menendez City Clerk Ajibola Balogun City of South Miami — Public Works Dir. (305) 663 -6350 / 668 -7208 Alan Ricke City of South Miami — Parks & Rec. Dir. (305) 663 -6319 / 669 -1266 Tom Carlson MCHarry and Associates - Principal (305) 445 -3765 / 446 -9805 David Aguirre -Wong MCHarry and Associates (305) 445 -3765 / 446 -9805 The following Pool Site Options were presented before the City of South Miami Commission Work Shop Meeting (copies attached): • SOUTH Option rev. 4/6/04 • NORTH Option - Alternate #1, rev. 4/6/04 maintains current Tot Lot in present location • NORTH Option - Alternate #2, rev. 4/6/04 re- locates Tot Lot to accommodate Phase 1 pool facilities building expansion • NORTH Option - Alternate #3, rev. 4/6/04 requires acquisition & demolishing the CRA Building • EXISTING Site Plan dated 3/23/04 included for reference only Presentation was made with "PowerPoinf' screen projection as well as enlarged 24x36 board - mounted color prints of each Pool site Option. Comments: 1. Public attendance = 3 people. 2. Mayor Mary Scott Russel comments: a) Favored the NORTH Option - Alternate #3, which requires the acquisition & demolition of the CRA Bldg. b) There is not enough open green space available in the community. She would like to see the community kids have convenient access to a sports playing field. c) The City had originally purchased the Mobley property for the purpose of expanding the Murray Park campus. 3. Vice Mayor Velma Palmer voiced the following reservations about NORTH Option - Alternate #3: a) Joe Gibson, CRA Director, opinion is needed, unfortunately he could not attend. OAMURRAY PARK POOL STUDY\ CORRESPONDENCE \MEETING MINUTES \04 -29 -04 COMM WORKSHOP.DOC b) Is not convinced that demolition of the Mobley /CRA building is necessary to create a playing field. c) CRA has plans to modify the building, although recognizing that the building has not been occupied since the CRA leased it from the City. No one at the meeting was familiar with the specifics of CRA's immediate plans for the Mobley /CRA building. 4. Commissioner Sherar comments: a) At this time, the City has not obtained the monies necessary to build this project, and it cannot afford to operate a pool facility out of current general revenue. That being said, the commissioner offered the following additional comments. b) The commissioner also favors the NORTH Option - Alternate #3 over all others. c) The Commissioner was concerned with the less- than - desirable spatial proximity issues: • Un- desirable noise from pool or basketball courts abutting residential property to the North • Tot lot adjacency to the basketball hard courts d) He recognized that these less- than - desirable compromises are originate with an aggressive program scope and limited park property. 5. Alan Ricke provided a total estimated operating cost = $170,000 per year. (incl. Liability insurance & Pool heating, (1) full -time staff, and part-time life - guards). These figures were derived from the Florida League of Cities data, and the City's risk insurance carrier. Not included are Depreciation (life cycle) costs. 6. Ajibola Balogun clarified: a) the Pool Site Options study was funded through an outside grant b) The study is the first step; in a series of steps leading to possible construction of the project. c) If all goes well, construction could not start for several years. d) The Murray Park -Phase 3 Aquatic Center is an important long -term city goal. The pool site options study is a necessary & important step towards realizing that goal. e) The study is intended to explore various site opportunities thru different workshops, identify compromises & derive cost comparisons. f) This will allow us to present the best option(s) to the Commission for their review and approval. g) The study will generate a Report which c an b e u sed t o s eek f unding grants. 7. Public Speaker #1 (female) — Suggested that water polo is a new and growing interest in public /private schools and their pool needs could help fund the operating costs. Particularly in the winter, if the pool is heated. 8. Public Speaker #2 (elderly gentleman) — Make sure the pool facility is a safe & secure environment. 9. The Commission will convene on May _,2004 to select one of the Pool Site options. 10. MCHarry will develop and submit a DRAFT copy of the Pool study report to Ajibola Balogun & Alan Ricke for final city review and comment prior to distribution. Cc: Ajibola Balogun, CSM Public Works Dir. fax: 668 -7208 Alan Ricke, CSM Parks & Rec. Dir. fax: 669 -1266 OAMURRAY PARK POOL STUDY\CORRESPONDENCE \MEETING MINUTES \04 -29 -04 COMM WORKSHOP.DOC Murray.Park Master Plan Update City of South Miami Public Swimming Pool Feasibility Study status report April 23, 2004 The City of South Miami has a longstanding desire and commitment to incorporate a public swimming pool into the phased master plan development of Murray Park. The Phase 1 Hope Butier Center completed in 2001, and the Phase 2 Community Center completed in 2003, collectively offers athletic and recreational activities with educational opportunities for South Miami's youth and adult population. The Phase 3 Aquatic Center follows through on the City's commitment to offer a safe and secure public-swimming pool environment for city residents and the community at large. The attached graphic exhibits delineate proposed alternatives to the Murray Park master plan by adding a public pool facility, and making related changes to public parking and hard -court location. These proposed alternatives are the product of more than a dozen meetings conducted over the last three months with a variety of concerned individuals representing neighborhood interests, the city commission, the community redevelopment agency, and the city's public works and parks and recreation departments. Each proposed alternative is organized, in part, around the city's interest in recapturing a meaningful open green space playing Feld capable of hosting youth oriented field games at Murray Park. Accordingly, the options for siting the pool have been limited to the northwest and southwest corners of the site. The attached Pool Feasibility Study material will be presented at a Commission Workshop on Thursday, April 29th, with intent to solicit meaningful comment and critique, and to achieve a consensus on which alternative best meets the City's goals and objectives. U) W Q U 0 2 Uc C E C CL cu C L CL W V! AN cc U- o° 0 O N 0- N N CD L O � Q E Cl) _U O a U) O Z Q 1.L O 'L vJ J E 0 L cn lal _L L L L L W C C c 3 U 0 -- - -- 0 3: * * ��EEELrn a) a) a) >•a)EEE�� c c c O O o 5 ca � >UUUan. Z a) o J Q Q Q L C O C O C O C O CL o U L O U O CU �OLOV�O o CL CL CL o O O O O o -5U) tZ -m �SU� cQ �a E "C O � C W 0 Z Z Z 2 >0:5;WQQ E 0 L cn lal I!\ m � _ » a�e r� m� � / \ � \� { � ». . S¥ BETH STREET --V- § : 7 � � \N « : }Nm P / ..0 r ..\ e \$c »a \ e -20 r \ » 2 � • \� \ \ � \ � 2 � rn En q m % M i I \ 3 4 c S W 6 6 T H S T R E E T v T 1 m x 0 PR —4 m ul C W 1 N m lD 1 ry Q r O Z / T NEW 1 E)09 . rn r; " s om mmmm «h o to En �y 5. I� F Dula - NORTH { L4 O _ If )> Q Off \ O Cl' O co o C3 C:) 0 r E4 rc� 00 U4 co 0 I\ C, Z < Q co� S '0 rn %e E m � i / N �^ j m scII N a , n F EXIST. S W 6 6 T H S T R E E T it J L µ_ I f T Ln irn r c m co D w mqa I ° D It m — ° O N Z n N 3. Vi 0 n c ED IR INS NED L0 on �- m ro 1 I fl NORTH out yyy� � z 1 ° 4\pO U m It m SM11i 4N -SMEU PAR19NG = 6 SW 68TH STREET it J L µ_ I f T Ln irn r c m co D w mqa I ° D It m — ° O N Z n N 3. Vi 0 n ED IR INS NED L0 NORTH out QlN Z ° 4\pO U m It m CA Z Z S ,,,.....,... - 5 C O C3 O T7 _' = o 0 0 y s m N W Q rnw In II rt — E F I \ cn , cn co 2 -O r D' m m `4, N N y � X9k 11 W �\ D \,/ F EXIST_ SW 66TH STREET m DUMP X o r- -n ^c_ 1 n , r II rn 7 rq CD tA r - '-4 o -, w D u ze SOUTH ON-STREET PARWNG = 6 S W 6 8 T H S T R E E T m o X o -n ^c_ n , r rn C rq CD tA r - '-4 o -, w D u o o I t n , rn tA ze NORTH Z 3b- O D D 1 \pp ° A o 5a io A m rr - � � C r C) ° v 0m G m� ED �` ED N i I \ cn co ] --I z "U r n m.� it rn N 0 2 y ti A m cn rn1 4 N 4\ S W 6 6 T H S T R E E T EXIST. SEIENW.K KA i M" 4N- STREET PAR - 6 i S W 6 8 T H S T R E E T � T i m x -D RS PR r co to n a w a r PEW I EXIST. � x 'U N n _ c -d N. 1 T ' - gD I - af7NED P r� r - e--ZDN 0 L - NORTH T z o �ppw:t ft- <O — TJ Z7 Q AO� 003 Q ro -� — s a, c — o0 0 o A U) a W o Date: Project: Re: Project Phase: Location: Written by: MCHARRYASSOCIATES MEETING MINUTES 4/22/2004 Murray Park Master Plan Update Review Commissioner Meeting presentation strategy Pool Location Study Public Works Office David Aguirre -Wong, MCHarry Associates Ajibola Balogun City of South Miami — Public Works Dir. (305) 663 -6350 / 668 -7208 Alan Ricke City of South Miami — Parks & Rec. Dir. (305) 663 -6319 / 669 -1266 Tom Carlson MCHarry and Associates - Principal (305) 445 -3765 / 446 -9805 David Aguirre -Wong MCHarry and Associates - PM (305) 445 -3765 / 446 -9805 Bolded names - sent faxed copy We met to discuss which Pool Site Options will be presented at next week's 4/29/04 City of South Miami Commissioners Meeting. Current options under consideration are: • SOUTH Option rev. 4/6/04 • NORTH Option - Alternate #1, rev. 4/6/04 • NORTH Option - Alternate #2, rev. 4/6/04 • NORTH Option - Alternate #3, rev. 4/6/04 • NORTH Option -Alternate #4, 4/6/04 • EXISTING Site Plan dated 3/23/04 Discussion: (Convert Phase I Bldg.) (Phase I Bldg. remains with addition) (Demolition of CRA Bldg. required) (Variation on North Opt- Alt. #2) (included for reference only) 1. Delete current NORTH OptionAlt. #2, rename current Alt.#4 to Alt. #2. 2. NORTH Option — Alternate #3, Revise layout of Pool area, everything West of Multi purpose Bldg, to match the new NORTH Option - Alternate #2 plan. 3. Provide additional dimensions, setbacks info, etc. to plans. 4. Construction Cost Estimate associated with each Option — MCHarry developed Excel spread sheet indicate that the cost differences between schemes are minor. The spread sheet will not be presented, instead show the Total Cost Estimate on each Plan, rounded -off to the first decimal place. 5. Projected Operating Costs to be provided by Alan Ricke at next week's presentation. 6. Send updated site plans to Ajibola by no later than 12 noon tomorrow, for distribution to the Commissioners ahead of our next Thursday presentation. MCHarry to include: • List of Drawings page • Brief Cover letter 7. Next Week's presentation: • Provide (8) additional copies of item 6 for re- distribution to Commissioners. • MCH will provide 24 "x36" foam -core board mounted, enlargements of each plan, to be displayed at back of room. MCHarry to provide "Power Point" presentation (we will get with Ajibola & Alan next week to review it before Thursday) O:\MURRAY PARK POOL STUDYCORRESPONDENCE \MEETING MINUTES \04 -22 -04 PRESENTATION STRATEGY.DOC III F \ tSl Co -4 OM N- 1 l O \ N m m v \ n M:/ �I SW 66TH STREET L It T LOA' ^= O 2 B NORTH m ED RS x ED PR _ cn --4 p GZ� Q W = m Z It tN,I m - -n z o 0 P m r �=r �D T m O a N ti 11 N v D —� D _ m O H z Q N ^= O 2 B NORTH � t^'n z Z 0 o --4 p GZ� Q W = m Z tN,I m o 0 P m r �=r �D c C-)� O �. N A fir, 03 N O -t 7 X, O O T 4 N> y D O O LA, Ct) Q I \ EAST_ SW 6 6TH H S T R E E T SW 68TH S T R E E T DUMP n ........... � t .1 -6 y f llq Fj I f 1118 A Ael* m IS >< .JNED FIR,,- NORTH C-A C: CA , CA > cn rn CD :c m 7 or - UPI :c C'l m W Ael* NORTH C-A C: CA , CA > :c m 7 I V T3 m VI al ILL I R E S 1 0 N C E S S W 6 6 T H S T R E E T I 11ahl, F- m rn R E S 10 Il N 0 E S EX IST. SIDEWALK I V%l L--- .-- - - - - -- --- n- rr -'r JLJ L 111 � Q D EXIST, SIDEWALK SOUTH ON- STREET PARKC = 6 S W 6 8 T H S T R E E T IF I E L D M A X L E N G T H 250' EDP ZONED D L -CF7A PROPERTY E ON ED L DUMP NORTH .............. CA C4 S—�. a— ) ° w�. I� C) � I 13� < Ill rni "J" 0 67' J m m rri 0 Do BLEACHERS F < I t 00 EXIST, SIDEWALK SOUTH ON- STREET PARKC = 6 S W 6 8 T H S T R E E T SW 66TH STREET -� y er�r� L L e POOL EQPT. 'gym O r 1 - Li r � 1 LA 1 0 — — — m m ti 4` cn co r a \ ca � m m 0 -I � "O m u w N v ND t m N", F EXIST. S W 6 6 T H S T R E E T �v 0 r, h D RS x. PR p �m . S `< t° O r V1�,_._._ SOUTH ON- STREET PARIONG = 6 S W 6 8 T H S T R F F T I t� . DPR., ED DUMP, � i b .... 1 o , ......,.y .......... F «L7 �3 —If NORTH r, h D RS x. PR v v `< t° O r cn 4 f ? A W p O N I V) cn I� ev- � 3 n L ��r —4 v s p -4 u Z o+ 0 v N D n _ m N a NORTH K muu Z v v `< t° O ? ;u M go < C G �5 p O N Q cn R ev- jE� rn Q � ��r Ael W SW 66TH STREET I I I i I I I I I I I I RESiaEINCES I � I tJ� I LANDSCAPE 1,960 SF 00 Fp, 3-4 D , _ _ 1 BLEACHERS o i '1 LLL JLI�JI N% S I, y li - j I� C Ali i I� m ze \ -+ z m --1 w in rnD 0 N t .TI! F- GYM STAIR LJ Li w � m rn r�� 111 0 of C m h N Q ' r -I _ o -- - D Tp! .a AtT qr. o O 1 t> T -m F` �I� N fir„ X 4A �j MN,£ Rg ` FIELUNAX L'ENGC „' 27,5 �ONEDPN•'° i ZONED PR -M PROPERTY LINE -n OMWD L BLEACHERS i .1 BLEACHERS , 6u1� NORTH � S O -0 Z II MCHARRYASSOCIATES MEETING MINUTES Date: 3/26/2004 Project: Murray Park Master Plan Update Re: Present (4) Pool Site Options to Commissioners Wiscombe & Sherar Project Phase: Pool Location Study Location: City Hall Commission Chambers Written by: David Aguirre -Wong, MCHarry Associates Attendees Company Tel. /Fax Randy G. Wiscombe City of South Miami— Commissioner Craig Z. Sherar City of South Miami — Commissioner Ajibola Balogun City of South Miami — Public Works Dir. (305) 663 -6350 / 668 -7208 Alan Ricke City of South Miami - Parks & Rec. Dir. (305) 663 -6319 / 669 -1266 Tom Carlson MCHarry and Associates - Principal (305) 445 -3765 / 446 -9805 David Aguirre -Wong MCHarry and Associates - PM (305) 445 -3765 / 446 -9805 One -on -one meetings with Commissioner Wiscombe (2:00pm) & Commissioner Sherar (3:00pm) were convened to present four separate pool site options for Murray Park, and to solicit comments & establish an order of preference. The four options presented include: • SOUTH OPTION dated rev. 3/23/04 • NORTH OPTION Alternate #1, dated rev. 3/23/04 (Convert Phase 1 Bldg) • NORTH OPTION - Alternate #2, dated rev. 3/23/04 (Phase l Bldg. remains with addition) • NORTH OPTION - Alternate #3, dated rev. 3/23/04 (Demolition of CR4 Bldg. required) a EXISTING SITE PLAN dated 3/23/04 (included for reference) 2:00 Pm Commissioner Wiscombe meeting discussion: 1. The Commissioner preferred the (3) NORTH (pool) OPTIONS. 2. NORTH OPTION — Alternate #3, CRA space could possibly be relocated to the abandoned Vehicle Inspections Station site near by, and within the boundaries of the `redevelopment zone'. 3. SOUTH OPTION - the Commissioner was concerned that local residents would complain of noise from late night use of the north side basketball hardcourts behind their homes. 4. The NORTH OPTION — Alternate #1 was most preferred. The Commissioner preferred not to relocate the recently completed Tot tot & wanted to explore the following modifications to NORTH OPTION — Alternate #1 (which we will label "NORTH OPTION - Alternate #1A): a) Preserve the Tot Lot & Phase 1 Bldg. with current functions. b) Expand the Pool Equipment building to include the Shower- Lockers - Toilets- Office- Storage etc.) Explore possibilities of attaching the new pool building to the west side of the Multipurpose bldg. c) Modify the North end (covered space) of the Phase 1 bldg. to accommodate Pool entrance gate functions. d) The Tot Lot may need to be slightly reduced in size to accommodate the pool deck functions. 3:00pm Commissioner Sherar meeting discussion: 1. The Commissioner questions the need for this public pool, since the Citywould be burdened with funding the operating costs. Tom reiterated that this project was borne out of the previous Administration's interest in creating a facility for swimming education ... a response to a past drowning in one of the local canals. OAMURRAY PARK POOL STUDY\CORRESPONDENCE \MEETING MINUTES \03.26 -04 WISCOMSE- SHERAR .DOC Cont'd 2. POOL HEATING costs, for year -round use does not seem affordable. If it is to be considered in the future, the plumbing provisions should be incorporated. The pool facility may be closed over the winter months to minimize operating costs. 3. The Commissioner expressed concerns that the NORTH OPTION crowds activities /people. To this end, the SOUTH (pool) OPTION works better to disperse `park' activities. However, the down side of dispersing activities is the likely need for more staff and the associated costs. 4. ALTERNATE #2 modifications: a) Move & reconfigure the Tot Lot (from the location between playing field & courts) to the left -over green space at East end of playing field adjacent to the Phase 2 parking lot. Secure the Tot Lot with a chain - linked fence enclosure. b) Add bleachers for playing field at mid - field, south side. c) Rotate basket ball courts ... may derive additional off - street parking; requires further study. General comments: 1. We will need to meet with Ajibola & Alan to confirm which schemes are to be presented in the commission workshop. Cc: Ajibola Balogun, CSM — Public Works Dir. fax 668 -7208 Alan Ricke, CSM —Parks & Recreation Dir. fax 669 -1266 0AMURRAY PARK POOL STUDY\CORRESPONDENCE \MEETING MINUTES103 -26 -04 WISCOMBE - SHERAR .DOC U I\ CA \ co --I r D 3 m CD I m m U W D ° M N ti no EXIST. F F SW 66TH STREET -� \..,,..,..a SDUTN ON- STREE( PARWNG k 8 L ....... SW 68TH S T R F FT -� n b v 0 5' 0 It Ae Au J IT � rn x Ln MIN WWC D RS -n r P \ O A � V/ D :fI Z Z � "- Cn G) - D If m Al a -a z _ D N 1, N r D 0 11 � — o+ O 0 W Z N � m NORTH P \ O A � V/ :fI a r Z � a G) - D m Al a -a o _ Z L ID (A Co R r D m� m �\ m � ti 1 4 / 4 ie yD D \/ I F SW 6 6 T S T R E E T -� m TI d PR - W, z ;1-n WW o m m 3; • • o D TD CA CDP z_ 1..._ EX�if SIDEWALK SOUTH ON- STREET o -E .� SW 68TH PA = fi STREET m TI d PR - W, z ;1-n WW o m m 3; • • o D TD CDP z_ ms's 16 m : O 2 �..__....._._Zyh' m s s��v I mix °_;,�: -^ IT �F 'f^'......... �h ouw NORTH CA o C Q S. .y 0 C4 1 M , Q \ Z 7Jf Sk TJ -O Q o I < C O oo m 0 3 to v rt m w 0 I U) Ln 00 3---A _r _0 r— D> 0 m .X m N -N rn ID rn EX5r. SW 6 6 T H S T R E E T EO�ED'O IL cl, L___j I Ln fn 0 , WIT, 1, 02-9 El) CD rn SOUTH ON—SMELT PARIONG = S SW 68TH S T R E E T EO�ED'O IL cl, L___j I Ln 0 , WIT, 1, 02-9 El) CD rn O Ln Ln 0 , WIT, 1, 02-9 CD 77-7— NORTH -m O Z: m 3� >. -4 0 •1 i� E6 0 O m Z m M 0 4- ID r- C:) — -, (D e-i- c :7- Q_ L I\ CO CA N 7--4 2 n f M \\ � z t N m m N no F EAST. SW 66TH STREET SOUTH ON -SMfEf PARIONG = 6 S W 6 8 T H S T R F F T .ti -L` I�r — F y � `ll µ� � T m NORTH x LA -1 O RS O PR II Q p n I - -0 a z Z z I f -o SOUTH ON -SMfEf PARIONG = 6 S W 6 8 T H S T R F F T .ti -L` I�r — F y � `ll µ� � T nunP m NORTH x LA -1 O RS O PR II Q p n M.1 - -0 a z Z z I f -o m ff'l D 1 LA 0 � y m o v Z a � N N g m G N nunP — NORTH II Q p n M.1 - -0 `< z Z W rt L I, �C m yr 0 \ i 1 A \ m m P 9 7 n IN .I \ S W 6 6 T H S T R E E T `EXIST. SMWW.K ',--j ISOM $N- STREET PM F SW 68TH STREET �r �r m a �n r v 1 5� NEW I EXIST. � � �• 0 1 N µ n z° cn D I LA CA F P M Y - --ED L a NORTH Lh O J CA M 4� rn O fl ko 1 w 0 1 cz�c� w Z ;u rn °< � m C- o m D rt a Q Q <. O ` CA 61 MCHARRYASSOCIATES MEETING MINUTES Date: 3/23/2004 Project: Murray Park Master Plan Update Re: Present (4) Pool Site Options to Commissioner Birts- Cooper & Vice Mayor Palmer Project Phase: Pool Location Study .Location: City Hall Chambers Written by: David Aguirre - Wong, MCHarry Associates Attendees Company Tel. /Fax Velma Palmer City of South Miami — Vice Mayor Marie Birts- Cooper City of South Miami— Commissioner Ajibola Balogun City of South Miami — Public Works Dir. (305) 663 -6350 / 668 -7208 Alan Ricke City of South Miami —Parks & Rec. Dir. (305) 663 -6319 / 669 -1266 Tom Carlson MCHarry and Associates - Principal (305) 445 -3765 / 446 -9805 David Aguirre -Wong MCHarry and Associates - PM (305) 445 -3765 1446-9805 One -on -one meetings with Commissioner Birts- Cooper (5:30pm) & Vice Mayor Palmer (6 :00pm) were convened to present four separate pool site options for Murray Park, and to solicit comments & establish an order of preference. The four options presented include: • SOUTH OPTION dated 3/10/04 • NORTH OPTION - Alternate #1, dated 3/10/04 (Convert Phase I Bldg.) • NORTH OPTION - Alternate #2, dated 3/16/04 (Phase I Bldg. remains with addition) • NORTH OPTION - Alternate #3, dated 3/17/04 (Demolition of CRA Bldg. required) 5:30 Pm Commissioner Marie Birts- Cooper meeting discussion: 1. The Commissioner was receptive to each of the options. 2. The NORTH OPTION- Alternate #3, which proposes to demolish the CRA (Mobley) Bldg. was her preferred option. 6:00pm Vice Mayor Palmer meeting discussion: 1. The Vice Mayor preferred the SOUTH OPTION. 2. Pedestrian routes between the buildings & immediate parking for the proposed pool facility building were clarified a) MCHarry will show the new proposed Pool bldg. entrance directly off S.W. 68tH street, rather than only from the new parking lot. b) MCHarry will show the existing Tot Lot to remain as currently sited (missing on the plan) north of the Phase I bldg. 3. The Vice mayor pointed out that the CRA has been in need of office space and may be inclined to use the `Mobley' building for this purpose as well as for other, CRA related, programs. These interests may preclude the NORTH OPTION - Alternate #3, which requires the demolition of the CRA (Mobley) building, if an alternate location cannot be found to house the CRA et. al. General comments: 1. MCHarry will create another Site Plan which shows the Existing site, as a point -of- reference for future meeting discussions. Cc: Ajibola Balogun, CSM- Public Works Dir. fax 668 -7208 Alan Ricke, CSM —Parks & Recreation Dir. fax 669 -1266 O:\MURRAY PARK POOL STUDY\CORRESPONDENCE \MEETING MINUTES \03 -23 -04 BIRTS PALMER .DOG cn co C') "I \\� m r7l - O 37 y \i rn m r n o I \\, a BLEACHERS COST. SIDENAL S W 6 6 T H S T R E E T J LJ a tww' - --\ IT 7* T =7' SOUTH OWSTREET PING =5 S W 6 8 T H S T R E E T J LJ a tww' - --\ IT <01 i@D rn CA C2 DUMP NORTH C,4 CA cl� C> o z 0 to k. 9, 0 G I f N -a o z i N m u +c N a n N FAZE SW 66TH S T R E E T BLEACtEn SW 68TH S T R F F T J L NO F b O S1 9 m IT v Do A W r �a � nun NORTH' s o z o m M r c Q .y Z S rt, ,-�- F I\ cn . Z cn co f D C') m IE m\ N I � � C3, \ z N —a 9 m \ 1 \ M W N \ D \ n \ N \ F EXIST. S W 6 6 T H S T R E E T t-- -30- L m D CZ) O � 1 Yj r If m a a NORTH � aura 9 l C-4 Z CZ) O If N O LA y ?° SMTH QN -SMEEf PARKNG = 5 F SW 6 H T H S T R F F T —� CA to coC D \ C') \ m \ I f a E a sl �► m N O a \ 1 N \ 'a m \ 1 \ N a m\ N S W 6 6 T H S T R E E T EXIST SCEWU I I I I I E SOUTH ON- STFEEf PWING = 5 SW 68TH STREET J l} IT M m Q 11 r� A CD N m .b d t O 3. CD m m -D CD — NORTH N G — n J Ln to Q p M = a 4- m = O m O O _ z G7 D _ to O MCHARRYASSOCIATES MEETING MINUTES Date: 3/17/2004 Project: Murray Park Master Plan Project No: Present (3) Pool Site Options to Mayor Mary Scott Russel Project Phase: Pool Location Study Location: City Hall Chambers Attendees: Name Company Tel. Mary Scott Russel City of South Miami - City Mayor (305) 668 -2484 Ajibola Balogun City of South Miami - Public Works Dir. (305) 663 -6350 Tom Carlson MCHarry and Associates - Principal (305) 445 -3765 David Aguirre -Wong MCHarry and Associates - PM (305) 445 -3765 Alan Ricke City of South Miami - Parks & Rec. Dir. unable to attend This meeting was convened to present three pool site options for Murray Park to the Mayorto solicit comments & establish an order of preference. The three options are labeled: • NORTH POOL, dated 3/16/04 • NORTH ALTERNATE POOL, dated 3/16/04 • SOUTH POOL, dated 3/8/04 Items discussed: SOUTH POOL- March 8, 2004 option: 1. Least favored. NORTH POOL - March 16, 2004 option: 1. Not considered because of previous Ad Hoc Committee preference to not convert the Phase building to shower /lockers etc. 2. The Mayor would like to see the Tot lot re- locate from present location. NORTH POOL ALTERNATE March 16, 2004 option: 1. Playing field not adequate, basketball courts need to be re -built at S.W. corner of site. 2. (33) required additional parking spaces now required. Revert back to South Pool scheme additional parking spaces since there is no gain in playing field length as previously thought. 3. This scheme needs further development to make it viable. New NORTH POOL ALTERNATE which acquires & develops the Mobley site The Mayor requested a fourth option be considered, making adjustments to the previous "North Alternate" plan. See attached marked -up site plan. From here on out, the options shall be re- named, as well as documented in Autocad: Current name New name SOUTH POOL - March 8, 2004 = SOUTH OPTION - 3/10/04 NORTH POOL L- March 16, 2004 = NORTH OPTION - Alternate #1 Convert Phase / Bldg. - 3/10104 NORTH POOL ALTERNATE- March 16, 2004 = NORTH OPTION Alternate #2 Not Convert Phase I Bldg. - 3/16/04 New requested alternate = NORTH OPTION Alternate #3 Assume & Demo CRA Bldg. - 3/17/04 Cc: Ajibola Balogun, CSM- Public Works Dir. fax 668 -7208 Alan Ricke, CSM -Parks &Recreation Dir, fax 669.1266 O: \MURRAY PARK POOL STUDY\CORRESPONDENCE\MEETING MINUTES \03 -17 -04 MARY SCOTT .DOC MCHARRYASSOCiATES MEETING MINUTES Date: 3115/2004 Project: Murray Park Master Plan Re: Present (3) Pool Site Options to Ad Hoc Committee Project Phase: Pool Location Study Location: Multipurpose Room Written by: David Aguirre -Wong, MCHarry Attendees: Name Company Tel. - Ajibola Balogun City of South Miami — Public Works Dir. (305) 663 -6350 Alan Ricke City of South Miami — Parks and Recreation Dir. (305) 663 -6319 Maria Stout -Tate City of South Miami — Parks and Recreation Assist Dir. (305) 668 -7231 Maria Davis City of South Miami — City Manager (305) 668 -2510 Levy Kelly (305) 666 -7323 Daisy Harrel (305) 668 -7385 Jay Beckman (786) 268 -2993 Simon Carrington -Bey (305) 666 -7329 Tom Carlson MCHarry and Associates - Principal (786) 306 -7969 David Aguirre -Wong MCHarry and Associates - PM (305) 445 -3765 Discussion items This meeting was to present the North & South pool site options to the Ad Hoc committee to solicit concerns & select the preferred site option. (7) color copies of both schemes, dated March 8, 2004 were handed out. SOUTH OPTION: 1. One basketball court is not enough. MCHA will provide layout with two courts in same location for consideration, it is expected to be a tight fit. 2. The added on -site parking at the East end of the playing field reduces the green space. In the meeting it was thought that the game playing field dimension could be extended to the current East edge of field with the current onsite parking layout. However, after restoring the onsite parking on the plan, it becomes obvious that the curved connecting drive thru the Mobley site) does not allow the full 150' max. width of the playing field to be extended any further east than currently shown. This could be a fatal flaw in the "North Option alternate #1 plan" to keep the courts. NORTH OPTION: 1. The Phase I bldg. use for after - school care programs is too much in demand to give up for conversion to shower, lockers, etc as currently proposed. The committee requests MCHA develop a third option which will be an alternate to the North Pool Option. See committee comments under that heading, below. 2. Parking for this scheme only requires 16. (33 spaces shown). 3. Excessive Pool activity noise concerns for neighboring homes to north were identified, especially at special events. However some felt that this could be mitigated by incorporating sound buffering measures and soliciting the communities greater concern for drowning prevention. 4. Provide covered bleachers (not shown on plans) which may double as covered connector between building, adjust pool placement accordingly. OWURRAY PARK POOL STUDYICORRESPONDENCEWEETING MINUTEM03 -15 -04 AD HOC.DOC NORTH OPTION - Alternate #1 requested by Ad Hoc Committee: 1. Keep the (2) basketball courts where they are for a savings. 2. Move the Tot Lot south of the courts. This frees up the lot to add on to the Phase I building to house the Lockers /toilet etc. 3. Add a Shelter (sun shade) for remote Tot Lot. 4. Restore East on -site parking lot to current configuration. 5. Develop (33) required additional parking spaces, to the immediate West of the Mobley site. General Comments: 1. MCH to provide annual operating costs (from Aquatics Design Engineering) for municipal pool (chemicals, energy usage, etc) to assist in determining patron fees. 2. MCH is available to make presentations to: a. to each of the (6) commissioners. Ajibola or Alan to advise. b. Neighborhood Workshop Committee meeting on 4/8/04. c. Next Committee Hearing on 4/20/04. 3. PerAlan, the Multipurpose bldg. is being fully utilized. Staff's latest idea being considered is to move the "Entertainment Game room" function out of the Multipurpose room over to the Phase 1 building (currently, the gaming tables have to be moved to create floor space for Karate type classes). MCH suggested other options for relocating the Game room equipment: • Build a new building next to the new basket ball court in the North Pool site option. • Relocate into one of the bays in the existing CRA building to the South. Cc: Ajibola Balogun CSM Public Works Dir. 668 -7208 Alan Ricke CSM Parks & Rec. Dir. 669 -1266 O: \MURRAY PARK POOL STUDY\CORRESPONDENCE\MEETING MINUTES \03 -15 -04 AD HOC.DOC MCHARRYASSOCIATES MEETING MINUTES Date: 319/2004 Project: Murray Park Master Plan Project No: North & South Pool Site Option Project Phase: Pool Location Study Location: Public Works Conference Room Attendees: Name Company Tel. Ajibola Balogun City of South Miami - Public Works Director (305) 663 -6350 Alan Ricke City of South Miami — Parks and Recreation Director (305) 663 -6319 Torn Carlson MCHarry and Associates - Principal (305) 445 -3765 David Aguirre -Wong MCHarry and Associates - PM (305) 445 -3765 Discussion items This meeting was to review the North & South pool sites. An 8x10 color site plan of each scheme, along with Comparative (Cost) Analysis, was presented for discussion. NORTH OPTION: 1 Show trees for noise buffer at North property line. Between playground & Multipurpose bldg. behind single family homes on S.W. 66th Street. 2. Show line item cost for Demolishing & building new basket ball court(s) in "comparative analysis ". - SOUTH OPTION: 3. Show property lines on site plan. 4. Delete proposed connecting driveway, on north side of CRA offices building. 5. Show line item cost for Demolishing & building new basket ball court(s) in "comparative analysis" General Comments: 6. MCH to provide annual operating costs (from Aquatics Design Engineering) for municipal pool (chemicals, energy usage, etc) to assist in determining patron fees. 7. MCH is available to make presentations to: a) to each of the (6) commissioners. Ajibola or Alan to advise. b) Neighborhood Workshop Committee meeting on 4/8/04. c) Next Committee Hearing on 4/20/04. Other items of Discussion: 8. Per Alan, the Multipurpose bldg. is being fully utilized. Latest idea floated was to move the "Entertainment Game room" function out of the Multipurpose room over to the Phase 1 building (the gaming tables have to be moved to create floor space for Karate type classes). 9. MCH suggested other options for relocating the Game room equipment: • Build anew building next to the new basketball court in the North Pool site option. • Relocate into one of the bays in the existing CRA building to the South. This meeting ended, Exercise Room Modifications meeting followed. See separate meeting minutes. cc. Attendees OAMURRAY PARK POOL STUDYICORRESPONDENCEMEETING MINUTES \03 -10 -04 N -S SCHEME.DOC MCHARRYASSOCIATES MEETING MINUTES Date: December 9, 2003 Project: Murray Park Master Plan Project No.: Pool Feasibility Study Project Phase: Predesign Location: Murray Park, Multi- purpose room This Workshop Meeting No.1 was convened at 6:15 pm on Tuesday, December 9, 2003, to further the study of alternatives to the development of a public pool facility on the Murray Park site. Attendees See attached Meeting Attendance Sheet. Discussion items: The meeting commenced with a presentation performed by T. Carlson (MCHA) Mr. Carlson conveyed his understanding that the intent of the meeting was to present the initial thoughts on the public pool /water activity to the public, get feedback and to modify the scope for this study accordingly. 2. Ideas presented included four main types of water features: Interactive water features, a Wading Pool, a Public pool and a Competition style pool. Also, from previous meetings with A. Ricke and A. Balogun, scheme layouts orienting the water features either to the SW corner or to the Northern side of the site, were preferred to allow for future use of the open area to the front of the building. Orientation of the pool to the SW corner of the site (Scheme "A") may be the best option for study since it provides the most space for pool related activities and for a buffering area, in this case to the South and West, from adjacent facilities such as the street and neighboring residences. 3. Mayor H.G. Feliu and Commissioner D. Bethel provided insight as to the best served type of feature, which would be a pool used for education on water safety and swimming lessons. This pool would also be for general public use, not just instructional use, so options such as a water slide and the provision of lap lanes can be considered. The study should also determine the expected occupancy of pool area. This would determine the size of facilities required which would help the city determine (and allocate) the initial and recurring costs. Although a Competition style pool may not be most appropriate at this time, a pool design which does not preclude the conversion or addition of a competitive pool should be pursued, to include structure, equipment, location, etc. The facility should also consider a wading pool for infants and non - swimmers, in the interest of public health. Pool security is a concern and in addition to fences and barricades, the use of a pool cover should be researched. It is thought that pool covers may be available for use as security devices. 4. Mayor H.G. Feliu noted that this study would require more public input, possibly at a second workshop meeting, before more definitive decisions can be made. In this particular meeting, turnout from community members was low, despite efforts to advertise by TV and flyers. One meeting attendee suggested that initial decisions should be made on the pool issue before the public is brought in, to provide more material for discussion at a subsequent meeting. The meeting ended at approximately 7:OO13M. The aforementioned items constitute the understanding of the A/E. If any items are to be modified or represent misunderstandings, attending parties are requested to advise MCHA within seven (7) days of receipt of these notes. if no response is received by then, the minutes will be assumed to be correct. M.C. HARRY & ASSOCIATES, INC. Jason Samough Cc: Distribution as determined by the project representative. MCHA file. NAME & TITLE WNUAr GF 9Rm TELEPHONE NO. FAX NO: rte. 1 SJ G t !3 C N ` &,1-2i J : {r 6�. (cv { r 4 'r: A G1T,(�� 1,G f f�� A (0261 Cor a l l �� ef �r r r.) os)�% cec � _ L2 33,ss Gi Cap- altAke, r S05- ' - <43 "_"- MCHARRYASSOCIATES MEETING MINUTES Date: November 11, 2003 Project: Murray Park Master Plan Project No.: Pool Feasibility Study Project Phase: Predesign Location: Public Works Conference Room This `kick off' meeting was convened at 1:30 pm on Monday, November 10, 2003, to initiate the study of alternatives to the development of a public pool facility on the Murray Park site. Name Company Tel. Ajibola Balogun City of South Miami — Public Works Director (305) 663 -6350 Alan Ricke City of South Miami — Parks and Recreation Director (305) 663 -6319 Greg Perry City of South Miami — Public Works (305) 668 -7354 Jason Samough MCHarry and Associates (305) 445 -3765 Tom Carlson MCHarry and Associates (305) 445 -3765 Discussion items: 1. T. Carlson recounted a brief history of the Murray Park master plan and the four pool location options presented to the ERPB in 2001, which lead to their approval of a public pool sited west of the Mobley Building. This option was predicated on utilizing the northernmost bay of the Mobley building to house the equipment necessary to service a public swimming pool. This conceptual design included a two story addition to the Mobley building which accommodated first floor toilet/locker /shower facilities required by the Public Health Department, as well as second floor offices for the Parks and Recreation Department. 2. Following a round table discussion on the pros and cons of a public swimming pool vs. an interactive water feature; out door basketball courts; and open field play areas, it was tentatively agreed upon that the scope of this study be modified to address the following water feature development options: a. a public swimming pool vs. b. a 25m public pool capable of hosting competitive swimming events (8 to 10 lanes) vs. C. a limited, 25m lap pool (2 to 4 lanes) d. an infant pool e. an interactive water feature for non - swimmers f. public health department related support facilities (pool sanitation equipment, toilets, showers, and locker rooms) 3. City attendees expressed interest in preserving a large open field play area to support flag football, t- ball, and youth soccer activities, as well as hard court play areas for outdoor basketball. With this thought in mind, the following two areas were selected for siting a mix of the water related activities Identified above: a. The area located between the phase1 and phase 2 buildings north of the east/west side walk. This option may require modifications to the phase 1 building in order to accommodate some of the public health facilities and /or pool equipment. b. The area located west of the Mobley Building. Accommodations for public health facilities and pool equipment may be located in the Mobley Building and /or in a separate new building. 4. It was suggested that a community workshop be convened soon to promote public awareness of the city's move to advance thinking on a water feature development at Murray Park, and to solicit public input. cc. Attendees OAMURRAY PARK POOL STUDY\CORRESPONDENCE \MEETING MINUTES \11 -10 -03 KICKOFF.DOC