Loading...
12-06-05 Item 5OF : A lllil.i5_Ll.l To: Honorable Mayor, Vice Mayor & City Commission From: Maria V. Davis City Manager Date: December 6, 2005 Agenda Item # Re: Authorizing the City Manager to execute a professional service agreement with C3TS for the Citywide Drainage Improvements Phase 111 RESOLUTION: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ISSUE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE WORK ORDER TO CORZO CASTELLA CARBALLO THOMPSON SALMAN, P.A. (C3TS) FOR SURVEYING & TESTING, FINAL DESIGN, BID AND CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES FOR CITYWIDE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS PHASE III (SW 62 "D TERRACE FROM SW 62 "D AVENUE TO SW 60'x' AVENUE, SW 63RD STREET FROM SW 62 "D AVENUE TO SW 60TH AVENUE, SW 63RD TERRACE FROM SW 62 "D AVENUE TO SW 60TH AVENUE AND SW 7e TERRACE AT CUL -DE -SAC EAST OF SW 5e AVENUE) IN THE AMOUNT OF $38,906.00 TO BE CHARGED TO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ACCOUNT NUMBER 111- 1730 - 541 -6490; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS: In the mid 1990's, Miami -Dade County completed roadway and drainage improvements in the proposed project area, which includes: • SW 62nd Terrace (from SW 62nd Avenue to SW 6& Avenue) • SW 63`d Street (from SW 62nd Avenue to SW 6& Avenue) • SW 63`d Terrace (from SW 62nd Avenue to SW 6& Avenue) Since the completion of these improvements, residents have been reporting recurring street, sidewalk and front yard flooding problems. Attached are pictures taken along two of the streets in July, minutes following a rain event. In response to the flooding problems, we asked C3TS to investigate the drainage problem. A complete copy of the investigation report is attached. The result of the investigation revealed that the design of the drainage system for the streets was substandard and that redevelopment in the area, since the improvements, may have added to the problem by creating additional impervious areas draining into the street. To correct the problem, it is recommended to replace and increase the drainage system in the area. As one of the City's professional general engineering consultants, C3TS will provide survey & testing services, design, bid and construction phase professional services for drainage improvements along SW 62nd Terrace (from SW 62nd Avenue to SW 60'h Page of 2 conn-Mi-Ageula • to • I11 f C 1 N®vim: 18 drainage improvements within the City's streets; and, 19 20 WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida, wishes to use the 21 professional services of OTS to provide survey & testing services, engineering design, bid and 22 construction phase services for Citywide Drainage Improvements - Phase 111; and 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 unl�T;F,12i MR WIN* I , ^ : 0 I R1!_ C:\f)ownmiu and SettinSAArickeNy DocumenWWord Documents\P-AolutionCitywideDrainage-doc 03TS WORK ORDER FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ► . TO: City of South Miami Date: 11/18/05 Public Works Department File: 1929 -00 4795 SW 75th Avenue South Miami, Florida 33155 Engineers Architects ATTENTION: W. Ajibola Balogun, Public Works Director Planners PROJECT NAME: City°,e'9de Drainage 1; Proveme its - PhaGG 911 City of South Miami, Florida SCOPE OF PROJECT: Drainage Infrastructure improvements along the following public street rights -of -way: SW 62nd Terrace (from SW 62nd Avenue to SW 601h Avenue) SW 63rd Street (from SW 62nd Avenue to SW 60th Avenue) SW 63rd Terrace (from SW 62nd Avenue to SW 601h Avenue) EB0005022 SW 76`h Terrace (Cul -de -sac east of SW 58th Avenue) AAC002142 Proposed improvements include catch basins, manholes, exfiltration trenches, piping and pavement restoration /overlay SCOPE OF SERVICES: Engineering Route Survey: (See scope of services on Ford, Armenteros & Manucy, Inc. proposal) Geotechnical Investigation (See scope of services on Wingerter Laboratories, Inc. proposal) Final Design Phase: Final design and preparation of construction documents, specifications, project manual and cost estimates for the drainage infrastructure improvements. Services include permitting assistance through Miami -Dade DERM Water Control Bid Phase Services: During the bid phase, we will provide bid advertisement documents, provide 24 sets of bidding documents, respond to bidders' questions and attend pre -bid conference. Prepare addenda to Bid Documents, if required, to clarify the requirements of the Bid Documents. Tabu late and evaluate bids received, check references of the responsible lowest bidder and make recommendation for award. Construction Phase Services: 1. Assist in obtaining and reviewing all documents needed in executing the contract between the City and the Contractor. 2. Attend pre - construction conference. 901 Ponce de Leon Blvd., Suite 900 Coral Gables, Florida 33134 305.445.2900 1.800.448.0227 Facsimile 305.445.3366 Web Site: www.c3ts.com Equal Opportunity Employer City of South Miami W.O. Citywide Drainage Improvements — Phase III November 18, 2005 Page 2 3. Attend bi- weekly project meetings. 4. Answer contractor RFI's and issue clarifications as needed. 5. Perform periodic Construction Engineering Inspections. 6. Review and approve / disapprove shop drawings. 7. Review the Contractor's Application for Payment and submit recommendation to -the City. 8. Review and process Change Order requests. 9. Perform project closeout with Contractor including final inspection, punch list, final Application for Payment review, and submit Certificate of Completion. These services are based on a construction period of 3 months. TERMS AND CONDITIONS: All terms and conditions shall be per our General Agreement for Professional Services for Downtown Infrastructure Improvements. Our fees for the above services shall be as per the following lump sum fee schedule: Engineering Route Survey ................... ..............................$ 7,145 Geotechnical Investigation ................... ..............................$ 2,941 Final Design Phase.... ... ............................... .....................,$17,640 BidPhase ............... .......................... ..............................$ 2,650 Construction Phase ............................. ............................... 8,530 $38,906 The City will provide printing.and distribution of bid documents as well as bid advertisement We are. ready to begin working on this assignment upon your authorization to proceed. If acceptable to you, we will accept a signed copy of this form as your written authorization to proceed with the assignment. Thank you. Corzo Castella Carballo om n Salman, P.A: Ramon Castella, P.E. Vice - President RC /er City of South Miami Approved by: uate: L:\ Projects\ 1929 -00 \W .0- Proposals \W . O. CitywideDrain- Phaselll- 111805.doc 11/11/2005 11:31 FAX 11003 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SURVEYING SERVICES Between FORD, ARMEN'TEROS & MANUCY, INC. And C TASK # f ROUTE SURVEY (P-Jg �F WA's t this t * FAM shall pure a Rage Survey loaned at SW 76 Skeet Saith on 58 Ave= pr g 200 f0A. Sotrth on 76 Teaacefinere is a oWasack Sexipcof Work • WOM ofWay • 2s'iabD *ant yard • Elevations every 251 few • CrhueofCooa • ofPaveMMt • C:�tBascofRtm • bvertEL -milm • EtevadonsofRigtttofWay PROFESSIONAL FEES TASK# 1..... ............................... A 000.00 fixed (pies exponsas °) Fixed fee includes above work description & five copies of survey. w ace last page TASK # 2 ROUTE SURVEY WG$1 =OF-ff" Under fits h* FAM shah pwpme a RmA6 SmW7 k+ mW at SW 62 Tmam fmm 62 A,veulae going Est 350 feet; SW 63 Sfn d fnn62 Avemie Q*g Fast 350 fed, &SW 63 Tamce finrn 62 Avernre 90mgFast350 feet Scopeofwork • rAft Of Way • 25' kilo yard • Elevation everyg0' • COnhrlm of • EdgeofY'avemod • Cast baseofRhn • lnvertFJ�tiarrs • Flavadim ofPA&of Way �t.OFFS�S[ONAL FEES TASK# Z.. ........ ..................$4, OOO.M fixed (plus cxpenaem Fixed fee incbidea above work description & Five copiea of survey. ` we last page 2 Cllest's hlitials Q: O acumentlFORD COMPAN EffiProposalsi&wnw)ingIPROPOSAL 01 -0TS CITYOFSOUTHJ, 7.4M2' C=doc 11/11/2005 11:32 FAX 1b 004 It is our policy to omaaplete our work in the most efii,ei mt and cost- eff� manner. please nest assured that we wouilid utffim our best efibrLs on the client's behalf We are prepared to prooeed wM the work described above. We request tbat yc►u a 1mmledge ameptame of the "osal by signing the enclosed copy of this kmer and reum=g it to us at your earRest possible oonveruenoe. We appreciate the appo=m ty to subwa our pmpoml and look ra*d to world with you on this At- TfW AGRE MWM FOR PROMMONAL SURVEYING SERVICE'S AND AWAMW "G ay, C0FbW x�vbb ARE EMMMACRNOWUMOM ANDA,CCEPM FORD, ARMENTEROS &MA.NUCY' INC. CSTS ----� rl Ricardo Rodriguez, Authorized Representative For the Firm. Print Name Date: '+ r r Date: 3 Client's rniiials QADommenalFORDCOMPANl ESIProposaisiS urveyingIPPOPOSAL01 -095 CITY Or SOUTHMGlM7 C32-doo Nqv 10 2005 11:23AM WINGERTER LABS OW TV WINGERTER � LAABOV ATORIEA ENC- P'roftodvnal Zngin*e& -1ng & Teetiug 1820 N.E. 144th Street North Miami, FL 33.181 Phone No.: 305- 944 -3401 Fax No.: 305 -949 -8698 CLIENT: Corgi Castella, Carba lo:Thompson & Salmaft Attn: Mr. Carlos Herdocia 901 Ponce de Leon 131vd. Suite 900 Coral Gables,FL 33134 PROJECT: City of South Miami (4 Locations) LOCATION: SW 76,62 & 63 Ter and 63 St S. Miami, FL 3059443401 p.1 DATE: 11/10/2005 PRONE NO.: _ (305) 445- 2900 _ FAX NO.: (305) 445 -3366 EMAILED TERMS: Net 30 P.O. #: PERMIT #: DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT COST ESTIMA... SF'W'MD/FDOT Percolation exfiltration usual condition open hole constant head test methods 4 Each 479.00 1,916.00 (Minimum 6" Diameter) (Minimum 2 Tests) Boring Layout & Conduct Underground Utility 1 Each 300.00 300.00 Clearances through SUNSHINE by Staff Engineer ESTIMATED TOTAL $2,216.00 TERMS: IT IS OUR POLICY NOT TO PERFORM TESTING SERVICES-UNTIL PAYMENT ARRANGEMENTS HAVE MADE. Rages are based on a normal scheduler) work day during the hours of 7 :00 am to 5:00 pm. Overtime rates will be charged at the rate of 1 % times the unit rate for testing conducted. outside the normal workday. Sundays and Holidays will be charged at twice the standard unit rate. ACCEPTANCE: Client and endorser agrees to the "Standard Terms and Conditions" for the work as authorized and performed. NOTE: PLEASE SIGN BELOW AND FAX BACK TO PROCEED WITH SERVICES. TESTING SERVICES WILL NOT BE SCHEDULED WITHOUT SIGNED AGREEMENT ON FILE. Thank you for the opportunity W submit this proposal REP DRP Corzo Castella Carballo Thompson Salman, P.A. FEE WORKSHEET DATE: November 18, 2005 PROJECT: Citywide Drainage Improvements - Phase III City of South Miami Engineering Route Survey: Fee Worksheet - Page 1 Survey Sub - Consultant Geotechnical Investigation: $6,000 + $50 expenses $6,050 Total $7,145 t 1 2 i , 6 ern 4 i ecleriaj' 2 Survey Coordination & Verification i mg ate 2 4 4 Labor Cost 135 190 450 240 0 80 Labor Sub - Total $1,095 Survey Sub - Consultant Geotechnical Investigation: $6,000 + $50 expenses $6,050 Total $7,145 Geotechnical Sub - Consultant Desian & Permittina Phase: $2,216 + $50 expenses $2,266 Total $2,941 Draina e RAO M rrf�cal Key Sheet 2 4 Geotechnical Coordination & Verification 1 2 2 2 60 2 i ing ate 2 4 5 4 55 4 Labor Cost 135 190 150 120 0 80 Labor Sub -Total $675 Geotechnical Sub - Consultant Desian & Permittina Phase: $2,216 + $50 expenses $2,266 Total $2,941 Draina e Key Sheet 2 4 Plan & Profile Sheets (4 shts @ 1 " =20') 4 12 24 40 60 Notes, Details & Schedules (3 shts.) 2 4 12 4 4 Genera/ South Miami Coord. and Review Mtgs. 2 2 4 Cost Estimates (50% and 100 %) 2 4 6 6 2 Project Specifications 2 4 6 8 Project Manual / Bid Forms 2 2 6 6 Permitting: Miami-Dade ULKM - Water Control 2 4 4 2 Final Design Phase Sub -Total Hours 16 34 62 50 64 22 Billing Rate 135 9.5 75 60 55 40 Labor Cost 1 $2,1601 $3,2301 $4,6501 $3,000 $3,520 $880 Labor Sub -Total $17,440 Reproduction Costs (Submittals and Permitting Printing) $200 Total $17,640 L:\ 1929- 00 /W.O. Proposals/ FeeWorksheetCitywideDrainagePhl 11- 111805.xls Corzo Castella Carballo Thompson Salman, P.A. Bid Phase: Fee Worksheet - Page 2 Taak ........ .._._. .`,,.n� Pre -bid Meeting i'rin '; 2 {xE 2 ) ch Clerical y Shop Drawing Review 2 Contractor Inquiries and Addendum 2 2 Bi- weekly Meetings 2 4 2 Review Bid Proposals 2 2 2 2 4 Bid Tabulation Contractor Payment Requisitions 2 2 6 2 Recommendation for Award 2 4 2 2 Bid Phase Sub -Total Hours Billing Rate Labor Cost 6 10 4 0 0 6 135 95 . _75 , 60 _._ __55 50 $810 $950 $300 $0 $0 $240 Labor Sub - Total $2,300 Reproduction Costs (24 Bid Sets) $350 Total $2,650 Construction Phase: (Assumes 3 month construction period) Pre - construction Conference 2 2 2 Shop Drawing Review 2 4 2 Bi- weekly Meetings 2 4 6 4 Contractor RFI and Clarifications 2 2 4 2 Contractor Payment Requisitions 2 6 2 Contractor Change Order & Requests 2 4 2 Periodic Inspection 2 2 4 36 2 Final Inspection & Close -out 2 2 6 4 2 Construction Phase Sub -Total Hours Billing Rate Labor Cost 10 18 34 40 18 135 95 75 55 40 $1,350 $1,710 $2,550 $2,200 $720 Total $8,530 L:\ 1929- 00 /W.O. Proposals/ FeeWorksheetCitywideDrainagePhl 11- 111805.xls PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT General Engineering Services THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of &Le_nib&04X by and between the CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, referred to as the "CITY" and CORZO CASTELLA CARBALLO THOMPSON SALMAN, P.A., authorized to do business in the State of Florida, referred to as the "CONSULTANT ". In consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants contained in this agreement, the CITY agrees to employ the CONSULTANT for a period ending on December 1, 2007, and the CONSULTANT agrees to perform all professional services in connection with the WORK, as described herein, on a continuing basis in connection with projects where the basic construction costs does not exceed $500,000.00 or studies which do not exceed $25,000.00, herein after called the "SERVICES ". SECTION 1- GENERAL PROVISIONS: 1.1 The CONSULTANT may be issued a Notice to Proceed to encompass the entire Basic Services, as defined in paragraph 2.2 for a project, for a portion of the Basic Services, or for discrete tasks as specified in paragraphs 2.3 Additional Professional Services, for the purpose of reviewing work performed by other professional consultants or for other miscellaneous engineering services that may be required. 1.2 A Notice to Proceed will be issued on an as needed basis at the sole discretion of the CITY. The CITY reserves, at all times, the right to perform any and all engineering work in -house or with other engineers. This Agreement does not confer on the CONSULTANT any exclusive rights to CITY WORK, nor does it obligate the CITY in any manner to guarantee WORK for the CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT may submit proposals for any professional services for which proposals may be publicly solicited by the CITY outside of this agreement. 1.3 The CITY will confer with the CONSULTANT before any Notice to Proceed is issued to discuss the scope of the WORK; the time needed to complete the WORK and the fee . for the services to be rendered in connection with the WORK. 1.4 The CONSULTANT will submit a proposal upon the CITY'S request prior to the issuance of a Notice to Proceed. No payment will be made for the CONSULTANT'S time and services in connection with the preparation of any proposal. 1.5 The CITY agrees that it will furnish to the CONSULTANT plans and other data available in the CITY files pertaining to the WORK to be performed under this agreement promptly after each Notice to Proceed. 1.6 The CONSULTANT agrees to produce and distribute minutes, promptly after each meeting at which their presence is required. 1.7 The CITY agrees to designate a representative who, on behalf of the City Manager shall examine the documents submitted by the CONSULTANT and shall render decisions promptly, to avoid unreasonable delay in the progress of the CONSULTANT'S services. The CONSULTANT shall keep the CITY'S representative advised on the project status at all times. 1.S Tile CITY ag �ees to issue ail directives and approval in writing. SECTION 2 - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2.1 General En 'nig eerina Services The professional services to be provided by the consultant are as follows: A. Roadway engineering to include streets, sidewalk, curb, gutter, drainage, associated traffic control devices, striping, lighting, speed reduction devices and incidental landscaping. B. Drainage Design includes the necessary analysis needed to implement proposed drainage improvements, preparation of paving and drainage plan for municipal building and facilities. C. Civil Engineering, to include Water Distribution Systems Improvement / Analysis and design and Sanitary Sewer System Evaluation and design. D. Traffic engineering services will include daily volume counts, data analysis, preparation of conceptual improvements plan, present reports and recommendation to stakeholders and preparation of final traffic engineering report. E. Environmental Engineering, to including, site investigation and design needed to prepare remediation plans to mitigate underground storage tanks, hazardous waste materials and asbestos materials. F. Other incidental services associated to the above items. 2.2 Basic Services The Basic Services, for design and construction, consist of six (6) phases described in Paragraph 2.2.1 through 2.2.6. The scope outlined below is applicable in its entirety to projects for which completed Basic Services are authorized. Upon authorization to proceed from the CITY, the CONSULTANT agrees to provide complete professional engineering services for any portion or all of the six Phases outlined below. The CONSULTANT agrees to co- ordinate his effort with that of any other engineering; landscape architectural or architectural CONSULTANTS to assure a coordinated and complete WORK. The lead CONSULTANT as designated by • Professional Services Agreement General Engineering Services December 2004 Page 2 of 16 the CITY shall prepare the final bid package including bid documents and specifications, which shall be prepared by, and be the responsibility of the respective disciplines. 2.2.1 Phase I- Preliminary and Schematic Design: A. The CONSULTANT shall confer with representatives of the CITY and the using agency to determhae the full scope - of the Project that -will r feet Use prugrain requirements, and shall advise the CITY if, in the CONSULTANT'S opinion, the allocated funds are adequate to accomplish the program requirements. B. The CONSULTANT shall use proper and adequate design control to assure the CITY that the program requirements will be met. C. The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Design Concept and Schematic Report, comprising of the Project Timetable (Master Schedule), Planning Summary (unless advised otherwise), Schematic Design Studies (unless advised otherwise) as defined below, and the Statement of Probable Construction Cost. D. The Proposed Project Timetable shall consist of a schedule showing the proposed completion date on each Phase of the Project through design, bidding, construction, and proposed date of completion. E. The Planning Summary (unless advised otherwise) shall consist of a vicinity plan and blow - up of the Site (if applicable) showing Project orientation, and a brief summary of all pertinent planning criteria used for the Project. F. The Schematic Design Studies (unless advised otherwise) shall consist of all plans, elevations, sections, etc. as required to show the scale and relationship of the parts and the design concept of the whole. A simple perspective sketch, model or photograph thereof may be provided to further show the design concept. G. The CONSULTANT shall present the Schematic design studies to the appropriate Boards for their approval when the project requires such approval. H. The CONSULTANT shall present the schematic design studies to all the appropriate utility companies (such as FPL, Southern Bell, Dynamic Cable, MDWASA, etc.) for any conflict with their utilities. I. The Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall include estimated cost of the Project including fixed equipment, professional fees, contingencies (if any), escalation factors adjusted to the estimated bid date, movable estimate (if any), and utility service extensions (if applicable). The CONSULTANT'S opinions of probable Total Project Costs and Professional Services Agreement General Engineering Services December 2004 Page 3 of 16 Construction Cost are to be made on the basis of CONSULTANT'S experience and qualifications and represent CONSULTANT'S best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer, familiar with the local construction industry and prices. J. The CONSULTANT shall submit and present two (2) copies of all documents required under this Phase, without additional charge, for approval by the CITY and he shall not proceed with the next Phase until directed by the CITY. 2.2.2 Phase-11 -- Study and Design Developiner�t A. From the approved Schematic Design documents, the CONSULTANT shall prepare Design Development Documents, comprising the drawings, outline specifications and other documents to fix and describe the size and character of the entire Project as to construction and finish materials and other items incidental thereto as may be appropriate and applicable. B. The Design Development Documents shall comprise the Proposed Project Timetable (updated), Outline Specifications, Updated Statement of Probable Construction Cost, and Design Development Drawings, etc., as required to clearly delineate the Project. If the Updated Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the allocated funds, feasible cost or scope reduction options shall be included. C. The CONSULTANT shall submit and present two (2) sets of all documents required under this Phase, without additional charge, for approval by the CITY and not proceed with the next Phase until directed by the CITY. D. The CONSULTANT shall at all times monitor the Probable Construction Costs to make certain they remain within the total allocated budget. A Notice to Proceed to Phase III will not be issued if the latest statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the total allocated funds. 2.2.3 Phase III — Final Design / Construction Documents Development: A. From the approved Design Development Documents, the CONSULTANT shall prepare Final Construction Documents setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the Project including the Proposal (Bid) Form and other necessary information for bidders, Conditions of the Contract, and Complete Drawings and Specifications. CONSULTANT shall use Construction Specifications Institute (CSI) Standards and the City of South Miami Standard forms for the preparation of the proposal (bid) forms, Instructions to Bidders, conditions of Contract and Specifications. The CONSULTANT shall review all existing City Specifications, for completeness prior to use and shall supply all needed additional specifications. B. The Construction Documents shall be prepared in a manner that will assure clarity of linework, notes, and dimensions, when the documents are reduced to 50% of their size. All drawings shall be on 24" x 36" paper ( "D" size), on the City's standard sheet format, unless approved otherwise. Professional Services Agreement General Engineering Services December 2004 Page 4 of 16 C. All construction documents shall be submitted in both "hard copy" and electronic media in a mutually agreed upon electronic format, but generally as follows: 1. Non - drawing submittals in Microsoft Office format. 2. Drawings in AutoCAD format. 3. GIS files should be in ArcView format Version 3.2. D. When the development of the drawings has progressed to at least 50% completion in Phase M. the CONSULIANT shall "° submit two -(2) copies to the CITY" for approval, without additional charge, along with updated outline specifications. The CONSULTANT shall also submit at this time an updated Statement of Probable Construction cost as indicated by time factor, changes in requirements, or general market conditions and an updated Project Schedule. E. The CONSULTANT shall not proceed with the further development until approval of the 50% documents is received from the CITY. The CONSULTANT shall make all changes to documents. The 50% complete Check set shall be returned to the CITY. F. A Notice to Proceed for the completion of Phase III will not be issued if the latest Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the total allocated funds, unless the CITY increases the total allocated funds or the CONSULTANT and the CITY agrees on methods of cost reductions sufficient to enable construction within the funds available. G. Upon 100% completion of the Construction Documents, the CONSULTANT shall submit to the CITY a final, updated Statement of Probable Construction Cost along with two (2) copies each of Check Set of drawings, specifications, reports, programs, etc., without additional charge, for a final review and comments or approvals. H. The CONSULTANT shall make all the necessary presentations to the appropriate CITY Boards (such as Environmental Review Board, Historical Preservation Board etc.) for the final approval. I. The CONSULTANT at no extra cost to the CITY shall make all required changes or additions and resolve all questions resulting from paragraph H if the changes or additions do not alter the scope of the project as determined under paragraph 2.2.1 A. The 100% complete Check set shall be returned to the CITY. Upon final approval by the CITY, the CONSULTANT shall furnish to the CITY a minimum of 24 sets of drawings and specifications, at no additional cost to the CITY, for bidding purposes, unless instructed otherwise. I The CONSULTANT shall arrange for "dry runs" and/or make final submissions to appropriate authorities (regulatory agencies to include and not limited to City, County, State or Federal) as necessary, to ascertain that the construction documents meet the necessary requirements to obtain all the necessary permits for construction. CONSULTANT shall • Professional Services Agreement General Engineering Services December 2004 Page 5 of 16 respond to all technical questions from regulatory agencies. CONSULTANT shall modify, at no additional cost to CITY, in order to acquire the necessary permits. 2.2.4 Phase IV - Bidding and negotiation Phase: A. Upon obtaining all necessary approvals of the Construction Documents, and approval by the CITY of the latest Statement of Probable Construction Cost, the CONSULTANT shall furnish the drawings and specifications as ` °indicated above for, bidding, and assist the CITY in obtaining bids and awarding and preparing construction contracts. The CONSULTANT shall attend all pre -bid conferences. The CONSULTANT shall be present during the bid opening and as part of his assistance to the CITY will tally, evaluate and issue a recommendation to the CITY after verifying bond, insurance documents, questionnaire and reference submitted by the constructor. B. The CONSULTANT shall issue Addenda through the CITY as appropriate to clarify, correct or change Bid Documents. C. If Pre- Qualification of bidders is required as set forth in the Request for Qualification, CONSULTANT shall assist City in developing qualification criteria, review qualifications of prospective bidders, and recommend acceptance or rejection of the prospective bidders. D. If the lowest responsible Base Bid received exceeds the Total Allocated Funds the CITY may: 1. approve the increase in Project Cost and award a construction contract or, 2. reject all bids and rebid the Project within a reasonable time with no change in the Project, or 3. direct the CONSULTANT to revise the Project scope or quality, or both, as approved by the CITY and rebid the Project, or 4. suspend or abandon the Project, or 5. exercise all options under the City Charter and State Law. NOTE: Under item (2) above, the CONSULTANT shall, without additional compensation, assist the CITY in obtaining re -bids, and awarding the re -bid of the project. Under item (3) above, the CONSULTANT shall, without additional compensation, modify the Construction Documents as necessary to bring the Probable Construction Cost within the Total Allocated Funds. When the lowest responsible bid is over 15% of the CONSULTANT estimate. E. For the purpose of payment to the CONSULTANT, the Bidding Phase will terminate and the services of the CONSULTANT will be considered complete upon signing of an Agreement with a Contractor. Rejection of bids by the CITY does not constitute cancellation of the project. 2.2.5 Phase V — General Administration of the Construction Contract: A. The Construction Phase will begin with the award of the Construction Contract and will end when the Contractor's final Payment Certificate is approved and paid by the CITY. Professional Services Agreement General Engineering Services December 2004 Page 6 of 16 B. The CONSULTANT, as the representative of the CITY during the Construction Phase, shall advise and consult with the CITY and shall have authority to act on behalf of the CITY to the extent provided in the General Conditions and as modified in the Supplementary Conditions of the Construction Contract. C. The CONSULTANT shall attend pre-construction meetings. D. The CONSULTANT shall at all times have access to the project wherever it is in preparation or progress. E. The CONSULTANT shall visit the site at least weekly and at all key construction events to ascertain the progress of the Project and to determine in general if the WORK is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents. On the basis of on -site observations, the CONSULTANT will use reasonable and customary care to guard the CITY against defects and deficiencies in the WORK. The CONSULTANT may be required to provide continuous daily on -site observations to check the quality or quantity of the WORK as set forth in this Agreement and defined by the Scope of WORK issued for the individual project. On the basis of the on -site observations, the CONSULTANT will advise the CITY as to the progress of and any observed defects and deficiencies in the WORK immediately in writing. F. The CONSULTANT shall furnish the CITY with a written report of all observations of the WORK made by him during each visit to the WORK. He shall also note the general status and progress of the WORK, and shall submit same in a timely manner. The CONSULTANT shall ascertain at least monthly that the Contractor is making timely, accurate, and complete notations on record drawings. G. Based on observations at the site and on the Contractor's Payment Certificate, the CONSULTANT shall determine the amount due the Contractor on account and he shall recommend approval of the Certificate in such amounts. The recommendation of approval of a Payment Certificate shall constitute a representation by the CONSULTANT to the CITY that, he certifies to the CITY that the WORK has progressed to the point indicated, and the quality of the WORK is in accordance with the Contract Documents subject to: L an evaluation of the WORK for conformance with the contract documents upon substantial completion. 2. the results of any subsequent tests required by the contract documents. 3. minor deviations from the contract documents correctable prior to completion and acceptance of the project. H. The CONSULTANT shall have an affirmative duty to recommend rejection of WORK, which does not conform, to the Contract Documents. Whenever, in his reasonable opinion, he considers it necessary or advisable to insure compliance with the Contract Documents, he will Professional Services Agreement General Engineering Services December 2004 Page 7 of 16 have authority (with the City's prior approval) to recommend special inspections or testing of any WORK deemed not to be in accordance with the Contract whether or not such WORK has been fabricated and delivered to the Project, or installed and completed. I. The CONSULTANT shall promptly review and approve shop drawings, samples, and other submissions of the Contractor for conformance with the design concept of the Project and for compliance with the Contract Documents. Changes or substitutions to the Contract Documents shall not be authorized without concurrence with the CITY. J. The CONSULTANT shall review and recommend action on proposed Change Orders within the scope of the Project initiated by others, and initiate proposed change orders as required by his own observations. K The CONSULTANT shall examine the WORK upon receipt of the Contractor's Certificate of Substantial Completion of the Project. A Punch List of any defects and discrepancies in the WORK required to be corrected by the Contractor shall be prepared by the CONSULTANT in conjunction with representatives of the CITY and satisfactory performance obtained before the CONSULTANT recommends execution of Certificate of Final Acceptance and final payment to the Contractor. He shall obtain from the Contractor all warranties, guarantees, operating and maintenance manuals for equipment, releases of lien and such other documents and certificates as may be required by applicable codes, laws, policy regulations and the specifications, and deliver them to the CITY. L. The CONSULTANT shall provide assistance in obtaining Contractor's compliance with the Contract Documents relative to, 1) initial instruction of CITY personnel in the operation and maintenance of any equipment or system, 2) initial start -up and testing, adjusting and balancing of equipment and systems, and, 3) final clean-up of the project. 2.2.6 Phase VI - Post Construction Administration A. The CONSULTANT shall prepare and provide the CITY with a written manual, to be used by the CITY, outlining the implementation plan of all the required maintenance necessary to keep the proposed WORK operational in a safe and effective manner. B. The CONSULTANT shall furnish to the CITY, reproducible record drawings updated based on information furnished by the Contractor, such drawings shall become the property of the CITY. C. The CONSULTANT shall assist in the inspection of the WORK one month before the expiration of any guarantee period or the sixth month whichever is earlier and report any defective WORK in the Project under terms of the guarantee /warranties for correction. He shall assist the CITY with the administration of guarantee /warranties for correction of defective WORK that may be discovered during the said period. 2.3 Additional Professional Services Professional Services Agreement General Engineering Services December 2004 Page 8 of 16 Additional Services as listed below are normally considered to be beyond the scope of the Basic Services for design and construction, as defined in this Agreement but which are additional services which may be authorized within the Scope of Work given the CONSULTANT. A. Special analysis of the CITY'S needs, and special programming requirements for a project. B. Financial feasibility, life cycle costing or other special studies. C. Planning surveys, site evaluations, or colipa ative studies of prospective sites. D. Design services relative to future facilities, systems and equipment, which are not intended to be constructed as part of a specific Project. E. Services to investigate existing conditions (excluding utilities) or facilities or to make measured drawings thereof, or to verify the accuracy of drawings or other information furnished by the CITY. F. Professional detailed Estimates of Construction Cost consisting of quantity surveys itemizing all material, equipment and labor required for a Project. G. Consultation concerning replacement of any WORK damaged by fire or other cause during construction, and furnishing professional services of the type set forth in Basic Services as may be required relative to replacement of such WORK, providing the cause is found by the CITY to be other than by fault of the CONSULTANT. H. Professional services made necessary by the default of the Contractor or by major defects in the WORK under the Construction Contract, providing the cause is found by the CITY to be other than by fault of the CONSULTANT. I. Making major revisions changing the Scope of a project, to drawings and specifications when such revisions are inconsistent with written approvals or instruction previously given by the CITY and are due to causes beyond the control of the CONSULTANT. (Major revisions are defined as those changing the Scope and arrangement of spaces and/or scheme or any portion). J. The services of one or more full -time Project Representatives. K. Preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any arbitration proceeding or legal proceeding in connection with a Project. L. Professional services required after approval by the CITY or the Contractor's Requisition for Final Payment, except as otherwise required under Basic Services. • Professional Services Agreement General Engineering Services December 2004 Page 9 of 16 M. Preparing supporting data, drawings, and specifications as may be required for Change Orders affecting the scope of a Project provided the Changes are due to causes found by the CITY, to be beyond the control of the CONSULTANT. SECTION 3 - TIME FOR COMPLETION: The services to be rendered by the CONSULTANT for any WORK shall be commenced upon written Notice to Proceed from the CITY subsequent to the execution of this Agreement and shall be completed within the time based on reasonable determination; stated in the said Notice to Proceed: A reasonable extension of time will be granted in the event there is a delay on the part of the CITY in fulfilling its part of the Agreement, change of scope of work or should any other events beyond the control of the CONSULTANT render performance of his duties impossible. SECTION 4 - BASIS OF COMPENSATION The CONSULTANT agrees to negotiate a "not to exceed" fee or a fixed sum fee for each of the WORK assigned to him based on the Scope of such WORD. Upon agreement of a fee, the CITY will issue a written authorization to proceed to the CONSULTANT. In case of emergency, the CITY reserves the right to issue oral authorization to the CONSULTANT, with the understanding that written confirmation will follow immediately thereafter. For reproduction of plans and specifications, beyond the requirements as identified under Section 2- Professional Services the CITY will pay the direct costs. The fees for Professional Services for each of the WORK shall be determined by one of the following methods or a combination thereof, as mutually agreed upon by the CITY and the CONSULTANT. A. A fixed sum: The fee for a task or a scope of work may be fixed sum as mutually agreed upon by the CITY and the CONSULTANT: B. Hourly rate fee: The CITY agrees to pay, and the CONSULTANT agrees to accept, for the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, fees in accordance with the following: Category Hourly Rate Principal $135 Project Manager $105 Senior Engineer $95 Engineer $75 Construction Manager $100 Construction Inspection $55 Senior Draftsman/Technical/CADD Operator $60 Draftsmen $55 Data Processing / Clerical $40 Hourly rates will include all wages, benefits, overhead and profit. ■ Professional Services Agreement General Engineering Services December 2004 Page 10 of 16 SECTION 5 - PAYMENT AND PARTIAL PAYMENTS The CITY will make monthly payments or partial payments to the CONSULTANT for all authorized WORK performed during the previous calendar month. For design and construction projects where fee for each phase is not specified, such payment shall, in the aggregate, not exceed the percentage of the estimated total Basic Compensation indicated below for each phase: 15% upon completion and approval of Phase I. 35% upon completion and approval -of Phase 11. 55% upon submittal and approval of 50% complete drawings and outline specifications of Phase III. 75% upon 100% completion and approval of Phases III and IV. 90% upon completion of the Project and approval of all WORK Phase V). 100 % upon final completion and approval of WORK elements A and B of Phase VI. The CONSULTANT shall submit an original invoice to the City's project representative. The invoice shall contain the following information: 1. The amount of the invoices submitted shall be the amount due for all WORK performed to date as certified by the CONSULTANT. 2. The request for payment shall include the following information: a. Project Name b. Total Contract amount (CONSULTANT's lump sum negotiated upset limit fees) C. Percent of work completed. d. Amount earned. e. Amount previously billed. f. Due this invoice. g. Balance remaining h. Summary of work done this billing period. i. Invoice number and date. 3. Upon request by the CITY the CONSULTANT shall provide the CITY with certified payroll data for the WORK reflecting salaries and hourly rates. SECTION 6 - RIGHT OF DECISIONS All services shall be performed by the CONSULTANT to the satisfaction of the CITY's representative, who shall decide all questions, difficulties and disputes of whatever nature which may arise under or by reason of this Agreement, the prosecution and fulfillment of the services, and the character, quality, amount and value and the representative's decisions upon all claims, questions, and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the CONSULTANT does not concur in the judgement of the representative as to any decisions made by him, he shall present his written objections to the City Manager and shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. Nothing in this section shall mean to deny the right to arbitrate, by either parry, in accordance with the Industry Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association. ■ Professional Services Agreement General Engineering Services December 2004 Page 11 of 16 SECTION 7 - OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS All reports and reproducible plans, and other data developed by the CONSULTANT for the purpose of this Agreement shall become the property of the CITY without restriction or limitation in connection with the owner's use and occupancy of the project. Reuse of these documents without written agreement from the CONSULTANT shall be the CITY'S sole risk and without liability and legal exposure to the CONSULTANT. When each individual section of the WORK completed under this Agreement is complete; all of the above data shall be- delivered to the CiT`I. SECTION 8 - COURT APPEARANCES, CONFERENCES AND HEARINGS Nothing in this contract shall obligate the CONSULTANT to prepare for or appear in litigation on behalf of the CITY without additional compensation except for any dispute arising out of this contract. The amount of such compensation shall be mutually agreed upon and be subject to a supplemental agreement approved by the City Commissioners and upon receipt of written authorization from the CITY prior to performance of a court appearance and conference. The CONSULTANT shall confer with the CITY at anytime during construction of the improvement contemplated as to interpretation of plans, correction of errors and omissions and preparation of any necessary plan thereof to correct such errors and omissions or clarify without added compensation. SECTION 9 - NOTICES Any notices, reports or other written communications from the CONSULTANT to the CITY shall be considered delivered when delivered by courier or by mail to the CITY. Any notices, reports or other communications from the CITY to the CONSULTANT shall be considered delivered when delivered by the CONSULTANT in person or by mail to said CONSULTANT or his authorized representative. SECTION 10 - AUDIT RIGHTS The CITY reserves the right to audit the records of the CONSULTANT related to this Agreement at any time during the execution of the WORK and for a period of one year after final payment is made. This provision is applicable only to assignments that are on a time and cost basis. SECTION 11— SUBLETTING The CONSULTANT shall not sublet, assign, or transfer any WORK under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the CITY. SECTION 12 - WARRANTY The CONSULTANT warrants that he has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this contract and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT any fee, commission, percentage fee, gifts or any other considerations contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the CITY shall have the right to annul this contract without liability. ■ Professional Services Agreement General Engineering Services December 2004 Page 12 of 16 SECTION 13 - TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT It is expressly understood and agreed that the CITY may terminate this Agreement without penalty by declining to issue Notice to Proceed authorizing WORK, in which event the CITY'S sole obligation to the CONSULTANT shall be payment for those units or sections of the WORK previously authorized in accordance with the provisions of Section 4, such payment to be determined on the basis of the WORK performed by the CONSULTANT up to the time of termination. SECTION 14 - DURATION OF AGREEMENT This Agreement, for the purpose of issuing nevJ WORK shall rem ain ift full force and effect for a period ending December 1, 2007, although the actual completion of performance may extend beyond such term, or until the depletion of funds allocated for the WORK, or unless otherwise terminated by mutual consent of the parties hereto. SECTION 15 - RENEWAL OPTION This agreement may be renewed, at the sole discretion of the CITY, for a maximum of one two year term at the end of the initial period. SECTION 16 - DEFAULT In the event either party fails to comply with the provisions of this Agreement, the aggrieved party may declare the other parry in default and notify him in writing. In such event, the CONSULTANT will only be compensated for any completed professional services. In the event partial payment has been made for such professional services not completed, the CONSULTANT shall return such sums to the CITY within ten (10) days after notice that said sums are due. In the event of litigation by the other party to enforce the provisions of this contract, the prevailing party will be compensated for reasonable attorney's fees. In no event shall attorney's fees awarded against the CITY exceed 25% of the award for damages. The CITY does not waive sovereign immunity from awards of prejudgment interest. SECTION 17 INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION The CONSULTANT shall not commence WORK on this Agreement until he has obtained all insurance required by the CITY. The CONSULTANT shall indemnify and save the CITY harmless from any and all claims, liability, losses and causes of actions arising solely out of a negligent error, omission, or act of the CONSULTANT incident to the performance of the CONSULTANT'S professional services under this Agreement. The CONSULTANT shall pay all claims and losses of any nature whatsoever, in connection therewith. The CONSULTANT agrees and recognizes that the CITY shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims, which may result from actions or omissions of the CONSULTANT's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions or acts of the CONSULTANT, the CITY in no way assumes or shares responsibility or liability of the CONSULTANTS or Sub - consultants, the registered professionals under this Agreement. The CONSULTANT shall maintain during the term of this Agreement the following insurance: ■ Professional Services Agreement General Engineering Services December 2004 Page 13 of 16 A. Professional Liability Insurance in the amount of $1,000,000 with deductible per claim if any, not to exceed 5% of the limit of liability providing for all sums which the CONSULTANT shall become legally obligated to pay as damages for claims arising out of the services performed by the CONSULTANT or any person employed by him in connection with this Agreement. This insurance shall be maintained for three years after completion of the construction and acceptance of any Project covered by this Agreement. However, the CONSULTANT may purchase Specific Project Professional Liability Insurance which is also acceptable. B. Comprehensive general liability insurance with broad form endorsement, including automobile liability, completed operations and products liability, contractual liability, severability of interest with cross liability provision, and personal injury and property damage liability with limits of $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. Said policy or policies shall name CITY as additional insured and shall reflect the hold harmless provision contained herein. C. Workman's Compensation Insurance in compliance with Chapter 440, Florida Statutes, as presently written or hereafter amended. D. The policies except for Section 17 A shall contain waiver of subrogation against CITY where applicable, shall expressly provide that such policy or policies are primary over any other collective insurance that CITY may have. The CITY reserves the right to request a copy of the required policies for review. All policies shall contain a "severability of interest" or "cross liability" clause without obligation for premium payment of the CITY. E. All of the above insurance is to be placed with Best rated A -8 or better insurance companies, qualified to do business under the laws of the State of Florida. The CONSULTANT shall furnish certificates of insurance to the CITY prior to the commencement of operations, which certificates shall clearly indicate that the CONSULTANT has obtained insurance in the type, amount, and classification as required for strict compliance with this Section and that no reduction in limits by endorsement during the policy term, or cancellation of this insurance shall be effective without thirty (30) days prior written notice to the CITY. Compliance with the foregoing requirements shall not relieve the CONSULTANT of his liability and obligations under this Section or under any other portion of this Agreement. SECTION 18 - AGREEMENT NOT EXCLUSIVE Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent the CITY from employing other CONSULTANTS to perform the same or similar services. ■ Professional Services Agreement General Engineering Services December 2004 Page 14 of 16 SECTION 19 - CODES. ORDINANCES AND LAWS The CONSULTANT agrees to abide and be governed by all duly promulgated and published CITY, County, State and Federal codes, ordinances and laws in effect at the time of design which have a direct bearing on the WORK involved on this project. The CONSULTANT is required to complete Public Entity Crimes Affidavit form (attached) pursuant to FS 287.133(3)(a). SECTION 20 - ENT a TY OF AG Eli IENT This writing embodies the entire Agreement and understanding between the parties hereto, and there are no other Agreements and understandings, oral or written, with reference to the subject matter hereof that are not merged herein and superseded hereby. No alteration, change, or modification of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by both parties hereto, upon appropriate action by the City Commissioners. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is accepted on the date first above written subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein. Authority of Resolution No.03- 0q -i19 (PV duly passed and adopte by the City of South Miami City Commission%• /Gad ATTEST: CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI Maria Menendez, City Clerk ATTE STATE OF FLORIDA Maria V. avis, City Manager CONSULTANT: ss: Acknowledgement of City of South Miami O COUNTY OF DADE ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of - " t? , 2004 by MARIA V. DAVIS and MARIA MENENDEZ, City Manager and City Clerk, respectively of the CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, on behalf of the CITY, who are personally known to me. ■ Professional Services Agreement General Engineering Services December 2004 Page 15 of 16 STATE OF FLORIDA ss: Acknowledgement of Consultan COUNTY OF DADE ) Notary Public, ,St� of Florida Print name: EqV( . OF- f-IQ'ALN4� APAYk3UAL Commission No: MARIAL(MACIA ,r COMMISSION rIUMBEF1 4 DD061886 �1 MMI, CPIFiEs OCT. 2,2005 The foregol instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 0 L , 2004 by on (yr;Pl P of C , on behalf of the CONSULTANT. He is personally known to me or has produced as identification. N tart' Public, State of Florida Print name:Ce Commission No: L> 0 2.6 7-7 4-,Z, APPROVED AS TO FORM & CONTENT Grace Morales My Commission DD287742 Ci"ttorney Expires November log 2007 Professional Services Agreement General Engineering Services December 2004 Page 16 of 16 *4x i r F. t �s a VU ' /" ti s L ✓ a^/ zrari� o a��� T` 3'M1fiy t 4 n % Ct � h, h5 s y; � ® F $ h Ba W *4x i r F. INVESTIGATION OF DRAINAGE on S.W. 62 "d Terrace, S.W. 63rd Street & S.W. 63rd Terrace Between S.W. 62 "d Avenue and S.W. 60t" Avenue South Miami, Florida i October 31, 2005 Project No. 1929 -24 CORZO CASTELLA CARBALLO THOMPSON SALMAN Engineers • Architects - Planners 901 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Suite 900 • Coral Gables, Florida 33134 • Telephone No. 305.445.2900 Corzo Castella Carballo Thompson Sahnan, P.A. TABLE OF CONTENTS -- Investigation of Drainage South Miami, Florida I. Introduction ........................... ................................................... 1 II. Investigation and Findings ......................... ..............................1 III. Recommendations .................................... ............................... 7 Figures 1929 -24.01 Corzo Castella Carballo Thompson Salman, P.A. Investigation of Drainage South Miami, Florida 1. INTRODUCTION In the mid 1990's, Miami -Dade County completed roadway and drainage improvements in the area of South Miami which includes the roadway segments that are the subject of this investigations Since the completion of_. these_! mprovements , - residents __have-- been_- reporting recurring street, sidewalk and front yard flooding problems. In response to the flooding complaints, the City of South Miami commissioned C3TS to investigate the nature and extent of the flooding problems and their apparent causes, and to study potential remedial measures and their costs. The services performed by C3TS are consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the engineering profession currently practicing under similar circumstances and location. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is herewith made. The report presented herein complies with the applicable minimum standards and practices of the profession. 11. INVESTIGATION AND FINDINGS The area of S.W. 62nd Terrace, S.W. 63rd Street and S.W. 63rd Terrace is a residential neighborhood composed primarily of small single family homes. There are also a few multi - family developments, the largest of which is an apartment complex that fronts both S.W. 62 "d Terrace and S.W. 63rd Street, from S.W. 62nd Avenue to approximately mid - block between 62nd Avenue and S.W. 60th Avenue. The area slopes generally from a low point just east of S.W. 62nd Avenue up to S.W. 60th Avenue (See figure 1). Prior to investigating site- specific grading and drainage issues, we examined the general nature of this area, in order to determine if the area lies within a zone noted to be prone or vulnerable to flooding, based on available mapped data. This type of data would tend to indicate whether the reported flooding is part of a greater problem, or more of a discreet condition. Figures 2 and 3 are the Dade County maps of October Ground Water Levels and of Flood Criteria elevations, respectively. The first map represents the expected average October ground water elevation. An elevation of 3.0 ft. NGVD is shown for this area. The second map represents the flood level which is expected to be produced by the 10 year frequency storm. An elevation of 6.9 ft. NGVD is shown for the study area. Figure 4 is the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map, which shows the area to lie within a Zone X with a flood elevation of 9.0 ft. A Zone X is designated as an area not subject to flooding during the 100 year frequency flood, with a flood level as indicated at 9.0 ft.. NGVD. Based on the foregoing, and given the general elevations In the area, it can be inferred that high ground water is not a problem. It could also be inferred that, with road crown elevations no lower than 10 ft., the general area would not normally be subject to flooding. From the evidence gathered from the mapped data, it can be concluded that 1929 -24.01 Corzo Castella Carballo Thompson Salman, P.A. Investigation of Drainage South Miami, Florida the flooding of streets, sidewalks and front yards being experienced and reported by the residents does not appear to be part of a larger area -wide problem, and in order to understand the problem, site - specific grading and drainage systems must be considered. As previously reviously noted, the three roadways (S.W. 62nd Terrace, S.W. 63`d Street and S.W. 63 rTerrace) slope longitudinally down from S.W. 62nd Avenue to a low point just east of S.W. 62nd, and then up to S.W. 60th Avenue. On each street, there is an intermediate low point -which creatas-an upper catchment- area encompassing roughly the eastern - - one -third of the roadway segments. The remaining two - thirds flows towards the roadway low points near S.W. 62nd Avenue (See Figure 5). Each roadway catchment area drains into a pair of curb inlet catch basins as illustrated below: Drains on S.W. 62nd Terrace just east of S. W. 62nd Avenue The catch basins pairs are connected to each other across the road by a closed pipe segment, and to exfiltration trenches extending east and west from one of the catch basins. The construction plans for these systems were not available, but based on the fact that no terminal manholes exist either to the east or to the west of the catch basins, it can be inferred that the trenches do exceed 50 feet each in length under Miami -Dade County criteria. Anecdotal evidence from residents of the area indicates that the reported flooding is limited to the lower catchment areas and is particularly severe along .S.W. 62nd Terrace and S.W. 63`d Street. The worst flooding was reported on S.W. 63`d Street. With each heavy rainfall event, the flooding reportedly extends from the low point near S.W. 62nd Avenue eastward for approximately 100 to 200 feet, and reaching a maximum depth of approximately 8 to 12 inches at the low points. The flooding reportedly does not persist, draining down within a few hours of the rainfall. According to resident complaints, the flooding is not a recent phenomenon, but has occurred since the drainage systems were installed along the roadway improvements project. It is unclear whether the severity of the flooding has worsened over time. 2 1929 -24.01 Corzo Castella Carballo Thompson Salman, P.A. Investigation of Drainage South Miami, Florida These drainage systems are closed systems, with no outfall to either a water body or a larger conveyance. As such, their ability to operate effectively and provide adequate drainage depends on a variety of factors which can be generalized as follows: Design The design of the drainage system (exfiltration trench sizing) must account for all areas being drained, the impervious coverage of these areas, for local underground-hydro geologic conditions as well -as ground-water-table elevations. The design of the drainage structures themselves is also important to allow for serviceability and maintenance. Maintenance Maintenance includes sweeping of gutters to minimize the amount of vegetation and debris entering the catch basins, cleaning of catch basins sumps to avoid heavy accumulations leading to excess debris entering the exfiltration trench. Maintenance could also include jetvac cleaning of the trench perforated pipe. When exfiltration trench systems begin to exhibit problems draining, the lack of proper maintenance is often found to be the cause of the problem. The useful service life of an exfiltration trench system can vary significantly depending on the debris load entering the trench. In areas with extensive tree canopy, leaves are a constant maintenance concern. If not properly and consistently addressed, debris accumulation in the trench can lead to irreversible trench clogging. The typical tree coverage on the three streets which are the subject of this investigation can be seen below. S. W. 62nd Terrace S. W. 634 Street 3 1929 -24.01 Corzo Castella Carballo Thompson Salman, P.A. Investigation of Drainage South Miami, Florida S.W. 63r4 Terrace As can be seen in the photos, the tree canopy on S.W. 63rd Street is significantly greater than the canopy along the other two streets, which may explain why the worst flooding has been reported on this street. The visible elements of the drainage systems were evaluated in the field to assess their condition. The following observations were made: • No accumulation of debris in the street gutters was noted. • The catch basins all have sumps. No significant accumulation of debris was noted in the catch basin sumps at the time of inspection. The photograph below illustrates the typical conditions found. Typical catch basin sump 4 1929 -24.01 Corzo Castella Carballo Thompson Salman, P.A. Investigation of Drainage South Miami, Florida • Some debris (mainly leaf litter) was noted in the bottoms of all of the exfiltration trench pipe openings at the catch basins, as shown below. The conditions noted above seem to indicate that the systems are currently being maintained properly. However, there is some anecdotal evidence that this has not always been the case. Figure 6 is an inlet condition assessment of one of these drainage structures, which was performed in November 1996, as part of a citywide drainage system inventory. That assessment reported the catch basin to be filled with leaves to the point where the pipes into the exfiltration trenches were not visible. The structure in question is the one which drains the worst reported flooding area on S.W. 63`d Street. It seems reasonable to assume that although current maintenance practices seem to be adequate, maintenance in the past was not being performed in an adequate or consistent manner. Based on the debris noted in the trench pipe, and on the information in Figure 6, it appears Likely that debris flowing into the trenches over many years has degraded the capacity of these exfiltration systems. Before concluding that poor past maintenance practices are the sole cause of the flooding problems, the design of the exfiltration trenches must also be examined. Also, conditions within the drainage area must be assessed to determine if significant changes have occurred in land use or development which could have adversely affected the systems after they were constructed. As previously noted, the construction plans, details and calculations for the drainage systems were not available, so certain assumptions will need to be made in order to perform an analysis. Design rainfall will be standard 5 yr. 1 hour storm = 3.2 inches. 5 1929 -24.01 Corzo Castella Carballo Thompson Sahnan, P.A. Investigation of Drainage South Miami, Florida • The total exfiltration trench length for the system draining each street's lower catchment area will be assumed to be 100 feet (See prior discussion). • The trench width and depth will be assumed to be a standard 4 feet and 15 feet, respectively. • The hydraulic conductivity (k) value will be assumed to be 1.8 x 10 -4 cfs /fe per ft. head, based on a recently tested value a few blocks away (See figure 7). • A safety factor of 2.0 will be utilized per SFWMD criteria. • The drainage catchment area will be assumed to be the width of the right -of -way plus 25 feet of front yards on either side. The large multi- family development between S.W. 62nd Terrace and S.W. 63'd Street will be assumed to be draining their 25 ft. front yards plus half of their roof area, for a total of 50 feet, into the system. The picture below illustrates the condition of this development's frontage, where the front yards are highly impervious (mostly pavers) and slope towards the street. Half of the building roofs drain onto this paver courtyard as well. The largest drainage area is that of S.W. 63rd Street, with a total area of 1.10 acres. The runoff coefficient (C) for this area was estimated to be 0.70 (See figure 5). Calculating the required trench length based on the SFWMD equation yields a length of 140 feet (See figure 8). Based on the conditions noted in the field, and on the analysis detailed above, the cause of the flooding appears to be the result of a combination of factors: • The design of the exfiltration trenches, especially on S.W. 63rd Street, seems to be substandard. 6 1929 -24.01 Corzo Castella Carballo Thompson Salman, P.A. 111 Investigation of Drainage South Miami, Florida • Redevelopment in the area may have added to the problem by creating additional impervious area draining into the street. • Past maintenance practices appear to have been inadequate and inconsistent. This lack of maintenance appears to have caused irreversible damage to the trenches. RECOMMENDATIONS The exfiltration trenches draining the lower catchment areas on S.W. 62nd Terrace and S.W. 63rd Street clearly are not performing adequately. It is improbable that exfiltration tenches in these conditions can be rehabilitated to an adequate serviceability. Even in the unlikely event that they could be significantly improved by intensive jetvac cleaning, it appears that their design is substandard and would still not meet the areas full drainage needs. At over 10 years old, and having been marginally designed and inadequately maintained, the trenches have reached the end of their useful service life, and need to be replaced. The exfiltration trench on S.W. 63`d Terrace appears to be in somewhat better condition, but should also be replaced since it is subject to the same conditions which led to the failure of the other two. The replacement trenches should each be 140 feet in length to provide a full 2.0 design safety factor. The best location for the installation of the trenches would seem to be in the pavement area, and would connect to the existing pipe between the catch basins on either side of the street. Figure 9 is a conceptual layout of the recommended improvements. These improvements include jetvac cleaning of the existing trenches, to remove accumulations within trench pipes and allow these trenches to continue to operate, even in their degraded condition. The estimated cost of construction for the improvements is detailed below: Jet -vac cleaning of existing systems Connect to existing pipes Manholes Trench Asphalt restoration 25% General Items (bond, MOT, safety, etc.) 25% Contingency 20% Planning, Engineering & Construction Admn. 6 ea. @ $1,000 = 6 @ $4,50 /ea = 420 I.f. @$110/I.f. _ 620 s.y. @ $30 /s.y. _ Sub -total Sub -total Total $12,000 $6,000 $27,000 $46,200 $18,600 $109.800 $27,450 $27,450 $164,700 $32,940 $197,640 7 1929 -24.01 Corzo Castella Carballo Thompson Salman, P.A. Investigation of Drainage South Miami, Florida 1929 -24.01 L abed ;_ u4 N 5 a. Cal 0 0 v 0 0 R1 0 7 io cu 0 l� 1� �O 0 N j QCD N w CD 3' 0 D ° b 'COD o 0 N 0 Q - C c o J D _ � N o CD m m � a m 'm (D v N � O U) O • co O O 7 CfQ N C O r-r b a. b 0 b I 0 -P 0 N rn cn rn N 0 N J ti O N J N O O 0 v 0 0 R1 0 7 io cu 0 l� 1� �O 0 N 00 N O O W Z abed C(D O �3 7 A o f � CO 1 -je � C O o d o , i.4E�.. Z ►� CD f vi rr i„ rt n 0 A 4 u,'3 � o c y, W 3 ' C p O tp N c = y N r�o (n coo to C O @ 0 C:) (mD a 41u�i 0 {a (D Q) (D'�O pp tt o , O W ,s fD W � 0 r IW rt N >v ,O c N o 1 O � G> sr 0. (D 00 �w iIt^ v rn-r �. Un O o Nr rte+. O CD k rt (D N f N N 00 i Y; d N ` � x 3 t-A _' 19 � ! v Ln cn 0 N 00 N O O W MA C(D O �3 7 A o f � CO 1 -je � C '-r rt, y O d o 77 Z rt e vi rr i„ rt D A 4 u,'3 � r a c to ° 3� fy (1) W 3 ' C p O tp N c = y N r�o f+ - 1� MA C(D 7 7 � 1 0 N 3 v' N o o 4 on (D 3 o N V C p O tp N c = y N r�o (n coo to C O @ 0 C:) (mD a 41u�i vii (D Q) (D'�O pp d A W ,s fD N � 0 r IW rt N >v ,O c N O 1 G> 0. f+ - 1� MA C(D mJ `U 0 N 2 o N V C ,n Ln (n O SAO flJ fll Ol a },1' a CL (mD (D (D Q) (D'�O pp W ,s (D r IW rt N >v ,O c /n/� VI ex fi t. G> (D 00 } tr fll v rn-r O rt (D N v r BROWARD COUNTY I RANGES f /s' 6 �' t t* _ -I, - =t 40 Coe'ro if NO T J GIZA 0 6$TO' op / / C • I beau• a■ [ "$ 00.r / 1 � 51• 1 zr -� • it ®� 06 `'� ( I•fLi/a! .sa I 6132 + 61144 Cb b 1 V I 6 TSS 9T4 061 Irld, 1 e' 11 / �k a \ c'2 1 F 23f ~ ♦r s� • 6 IS 611 S 2� �F45 5t 1411 '- IG, 0 , ,a! A. • s VJ6 1351 2 = e f r A YY' a- -I- - - --- -- - - -- -•61- - �3 a -w 4A 1. 4 1AM T1Y.a Ma. ® �.. 1 6 iN I .a. • f 1 (-7 W Y L I 1 C Tfle♦ ++ "� r / V V- - - - - -^1- - - 311 �l •'� 1 6 & 5064 a 6151 • ff 1 pqa� 61502 ®61362 I 2 GTSTA EJ [•A D• •[ 1y it � I p � o.a•[• •1+ O ®; y ® ®® 6 ? h d ®13431 Q614 ua i CGC "u rA.r p 0 1- I $?"A 270 ® Ca •9 Oa. viol 113 i I Lo91oa cn. C7 1 6494 ® 1-267 1 A I WA f®i a 3 LEOEND: ° (ESTIMATED) - - - -- --- -- -- — �'•- NOTES: *ilzsl I a I. CONTOUR INTERVAL 1.0 FOOT. ° (Except as indicated) 1 * 2. DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL. WALE IN MILES _ �1 i NOTE: PREPARED FROM US.G.cs . 511 f SURVEY DATA METROPOLITAN REVISED DESIGN STANDARDS DADE COUNTY APPROVED 2/19/75 AVERAGE OCTOBER wc a PUBLIC KS 4/5/72 4/14/77 GROUND WATER LEVEi __ DEPARTMENT 1960-75 FIGURE 2 2 NEWS Lq Tri AN 4 110 "e `w M. �awl 11 Ion .�w1w.. IN d r� /�ew�..�• Ion APPROvED BAN • sell - i • f 1 I 'Ell �m mr to to X m 2u iii < < AC m m y P 3*° m'o� oEo M o A LA Z ao ao 0 0 0�'0 o a a.v N o 0. 3' r � h, 0 iii ��� s..• � L tz a O �• io li O R o d s it N e� _i T(N At v d n N n _ m moo, ( n ro u, %. tt lit Ili iii < < AC m 3*° m'o� oEo M o A LA Z ao ao 0 0 0�'0 o a a.v N o o Sr m R > m< o< �m o m w •'a moo, g3-n ;m� 3� tot-� 5� oca- a a 6- a c D o =t � O ao o• o• � N O m w < o. ti• n � C N CL w K ao I I LI'm N G D trt I 0 a m IN .w. 7 3 a t4 00- p �m z C� D°r mf -n -Z /_ �O ® D ® N o D O m � m � w D m N •rte m t rm m v I CA SW 60.+ AVE J W 0'i r INLET DATA AND CONDITION ASSESSMENT Project Number - 10; / I Municipality:c� % ®r�o ' Sheet Number. Inlet Number. Location: S E ; W ,:�Ij G 3 S+. Cross Street: Building Number. ! ; 5 Need Traffic Control: Yes ❑ No X] Inlet Type : Cover Type: Cover Shape Ditch Inlet ❑ Ij Grating ; Circular ❑ [❑T❑ft. ❑in. Guitar Inlet ^' redo ated iJ ADiam.: Square e. v, ��ft. � T � -In Curb Inlet ❑ I Solid ❑ Rectangular ❑ Length: [❑ft. ❑in. Other ❑ So Other ❑ Width: mft. Min. Structure Type : Structural Shape Concrete Block ❑ Circular Nr Diam.: O 3 ft. n. Limerock ❑ Brick ❑ Square ❑ Size: ft. Min. Other ❑ re - Rectangular ❑ Length: ft.❑in.' Width: mft.' ❑in. =' Surface Type: Land Use: Sump: Asphalt Dirt ❑ Residential (- Other ❑ Yes ® No []; e Concrete ❑ Other F] F] Depth [❑ft. ❑in. Grass ❑ lCommercial Gravel ❑ Industrial ❑ Drainage: I ' * Depth from rim/cover to pipe inlet , ** Drain Type: ET = Exi'iItration Trench PD = Positive Drainage SCT = Slab Covered Trench N S � ' E i W din ..�� f7 .• N S E I i General Comments �1 ��P.� �,/ �P�t�'S • (' nn o-t' SC's �D,OPS i FIGURE 6 Page 1 IN Lt I UATA AND CONDITION A55E551i Assessment RAT: Rate components as Acceptable (OK) or Unacceptable (NO) DEF : Identffy presence of Deficiency ( X ) ITEM IRAT DEF GENERAL COMMENTS AND SEVERITY Elevation GENERAL ° Pollutants Cover Type Cover /Grate Broken Broken Hinge ErokenlLoose Frame.. Other . : :�.;,;..7;, scat,•: r: r,{;.;:: x±. ��. �. m.; cn; �r;: �;,;'::': �:• Y!•»'»,,,;,` Y>;. ,;. }Y,;.,., >.r >vY,.,> }:y.Y;;ar: x�;:�.r,;:;.;;;9> Rings/Brickwork Broken Crack Walls Cracking Crumbling/Spalling Puncture Exposed Reinforcing. Section Joints Deposit/Debris Base /Sum Other S e ' Miscellaneous Deficiencies: Orientation Sketch : `J Location etch Date: '6 time: 3 : /Fa.m. 11 FIGURE 61 Page 2 GENERAL ° Pollutants . : :�.;,;..7;, scat,•: r: r,{;.;:: x±. ��. �. m.; cn; �r;: �;,;'::': �:• Y!•»'»,,,;,` Y>;. ,;. }Y,;.,., >.r >vY,.,> }:y.Y;;ar: x�;:�.r,;:;.;;;9> Orientation Sketch : `J Location etch Date: '6 time: 3 : /Fa.m. 11 FIGURE 61 Page 2 WINGERTER LABORATORIES, INC. Engineering Testing & Inspection Services 1820 NE 144th Street, North Miami, FL 33181 Telephone (305) 944 -3401 - Fax. No. 949 -8698 No. 2 REPORT: SOIL PERMEABILITY TEST D.O.T. PERCOLATION EXFILTRATION USUAL CONDITION TEST METHOD CLIENT: PROJECT:' PROJECT LOCATION: TEST LOCATION: REPORTED TO: City of South Miami Drainage Study 5701 S.W. 62 "d Avenue, Miami, Florida As shown on soil permeability location sketch City of South Miami - Engineering &Construction Dept. 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, Florida 33143 - Attn: Mr. Ajibola Balogun 8 -24 -00 ko Lab. No. 282 DATE: 8 -23 -00 TEST NO P -2 Permeability test was performed by drilling the test hole to a depth of 15 feet. Water was added to the test hole at an average stabilized rate of approximately 8.0 gallons per minute (gpm) for a period of 15 minutes in order to maintain a constant head at the ground surface level. The Hydraulic Conductivity was calculated as follows Q = Average Stabilized Rate: 8.0 gpm H = Depth to Ground Water Level: 5 ft. Ds = Saturated Depth: 10 ft. d = Diameter of Test Hole: 6 in. K = Hydraulic Conductivity = 4Q = 1.8 x 10' cfs /ft 2 per ft. of head 7rd(2H2 + 4HDs +dH) SUBSURFACE DATA Depth Soil Description 0' -1' Tan LIMEROCK FILL 1' -3' Gray silty SAND with some fragmented limestone (fill) 3' -15' Tan LIMESTONE with trace limesand i Field Tech: JC/MF Respectfully submitted, Z,'ER =LABOES, INC. Rafael M. Pina, P.E. Florida Registration No. 50771 Order No. 01 -2272 ?. The original of this report was signed and sealed by the above referenced Florida Registered Professional Engineer in accord F I G U R E 7 61G15- 18.011 of the Florida Administrative Code. Project Name: South Miami SW 63 St Project No. :1929 -24 Date: October, 2005 Designed by: Carlos Herdocia P.E. Checked by: RAMON CASTELLA P.E. EXFILTRATION TRENCH DESIGN SFWMD - CASE 2 Description of Variables: L = LENGTH OF TRENCH REQUIRED (FEET) V = VOLUME TREATED (ACRE- INCHES) W = TRENCH WIDTH (FEET) K = HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY (CFS /FTA2- FT.HEAD) H = DEPTH TO WATER TABLE (FEET) Du= NON - SATURATED TRENCH DEPTH (FEET) DS= SATURATED TRENCH DEPTH (FEET) h = TOTAL TRENCH DEPTH Design Parameters: Case 2: Ds > Du or V:= 2.46 W > 2h K:= 1.8. 10 4 H:= 7.0 W:= 4 Du := 5.5 Ds := 9.5 h: =Du +Ds h =15 Solving for L gives, K•(2•H•Du — Du2 + 2•H•Ds) + (1.39.10 4) WDu L = 69.466 LENGTH OF TRENCH REQUIRED= 140 L.F. < wi'M 2.0 6Af6TY FAclort- LENGTH OF TRENCH PROVIDED= 100 L.F. 6 aungia �(D I t0) CA i SW 6a' AVE