Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
11-15-05 Item 10
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER INTER- OFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor, Vice Mayor & Commission Members r From: Maria V. Davis CS City Manager ORDINANCE South Miami All- AmericaChy zoos Date: November 15, 2005 ITEM No. /0 RE: Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report 2005 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, ADOPTING AND TRANSMITTING THE 2005 EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT OF THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT AND REQUESTING THAT THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DELEGATE THE SUFFICIENCY REVIEW OF THE EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) OF THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL (SFRPC) PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ACT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILTY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE STATUS The Evaluation and Appraisal Report and transmittal ordinance was adopted on first reading at the City Commission's October 18, 2005 meeting. A discussion workshop was held on November 7, 2005 at which time it was agreed that there would be two public hearings scheduled prior to adoption. The first hearing is set for November 15, 2005 as part of the regular Commission meeting. A second public hearing was scheduled as a special meeting to be held on Monday, November 28, 2005 at 7:30 PM BACKGROUND (1) WHAT IS THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The South Miami Comprehensive Plan is an official document adopted by the City Commission and used as a guideline for all future development in the City. It is a document that establishes future goals for the City and policies as to how to achieve the goals. There are also objectives listed so that it is possible to measure progress. The Comprehensive Plan is not a static document as it can be amended to assure that it reacts to changing situations. The City's Comprehensive Plan contains a Future Land Use Map which shows for every property the type of uses allowed, the maximum number of dwelling units or building floor area that can be built (density) and the maximum height of buildings. These maximum standards are implemented by more detailed regulations in the Land Development Code (zoning code). The Plan also lists goals and policies which describe how the City will address traffic, improve streets, build recreational facilities, develop parks, protect the environment and encourage the building of new homes and apartments. These policies are implemented by inclusion in the City's capital improvement program. EAR 2005 November 15, 2005 (2) (2) WHAT IS THE EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT "EAR" The Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) is a State - mandated review of the Comprehensive Plan. The State of Florida requires all local governments to do a full review and update of the Comprehensive Plan every 5 -7 years. The EAR is an opportunity for the local jurisdiction to identify major development oriented issues, review past responses and assess how well the Comprehensive Plan has responded. When completed, the EAR document is submitted to the State for review, comment and acceptance. Following the State's finding of sufficiency,the City will begin the process of revising the current Comp- rehensive Plan by adopting appropriate amendments. These changes will affect development and quality of life in all of the City's residential and commercial areas. The preparation of the EAR began over a year ago with the Planning Department staff setting forth a detailed work program and public meeting schedule. Following the issuance of a request for proposals in October, 2004, the City Commission approved the hiring of the Corradino Group as consultants to assist in the preparation of the EAR. The Corradino Group and its sub - contractor Bell -David Planning Group participated in citizen input meetings and prepared the required technical submission material. (3) CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT A key element in this evaluation process is input from citizens, local officials and sister jurisdictions. Once the assessments have been made, the EAR can identify changes that need to be made to the adopted Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Department used various methods to obtain citizen input, including comments from the City's web site, scoping meetings, workshops, mail -out and phone surveys and public hearings. Attached is a summary list of citizen input methods used as part of the EAR process. EAR DOCUMENT The attached EAR Document contains seven chapters and several appendixes. The following overview is provided: • Chapters II and III contain information which is required data and analysis to measure whether or not the current, goals, objectives, and policies listed in the current Comprehensive Plan (updated in 1997) have been accomplished. • Chapter IV is an analysis of the City's current levels of service and how the City's Comprehensive Plan is compatible with State and public school policies. • Chapter V a summary of recommendations suggesting that City objectives and policies need to be changed or updated. This chapter (pp. 145 -161) details all of the text revisions that the City will need to make in the Comprehensive Plan during the next year. • Table II A.2. (pp. 12 -14) ; mgp on p.15 entitled "Potential Future Land Use Map and Zoning Map Amendments" - this table and map is a culmination of information gathered from citizen comments, surveys, Planning Board members and professional staff on what revisions are necessary to update the Comprehensive Plan future land use map and the Land Development Code. PLANNING BOARD ACTION The Planning Board at its September 29, 2005 meeting, adopted a motion by a vote of 6 ayes 0 nays recommending approval of the draft EAR document. The Board made a number of revisions to the report based upon public testimony and its own observations. These revisions are explained in text sections of the report and will be highlighted at the EAR presentation. EAR 2005 November 15, 2005 (3) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Commission conduct the first of the two scheduled public hearings on the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) and transmittal ordinance. Attachments: Citizen Input Summary Draft Ordinance Planning Board Minutes Excerpt Sept.29, 2005 Public Notices MD/DOD /SAY,. r" E: \Comm Items\2005\1 1-1 5-05\EAR 2005 CM Report.doc COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT 2005 SUMMARY OF CITIZEN INPUT METHODS WEB SITE COMMENTS • Comments forwarded to Planning Department in response to web site invitation on cityofsouth miami.net MEETINGS (Information gathering) • November 30, 2004 - Planning Board Workshop on visioning, citizens in attendance were invited to participate. • February 28, 2005 - Historic Preservation Board, elicited responses relating to historic preservation issues. • February 28, 2005 - Interagency Scoping Meeting, staff from other governmental (State, County) agencies invited to provide comments and suggestions. • March 19, 2005 - Environmental Review and Preservation Board, obtained comments related to design and site issues. • April 14, 2005 - City Commission Workshop; Mayor and Commissioners provided comments on planning issues. • May 23, 2005 - Open Public Comment Meeting, several dozen citizens provided input on planning and development issues. COMMENTS VIA LETTERS / INFORMAL MEETINGS • Letters received from citizens. • Comments brought to staff during meetings with citizens, developers and property owners. CITIZEN SURVEY -MAIL OUT • Mail out of questionnaire in the August City newsletter will be sent to all households; survey questions same as the 1988 survey. RANDOMIZED PHONE SURVEY • Phone survey of 250 -300 households to obtain information on future development and level of services. PUBLIC HEARINGS • Planning Board public hearings ( August 30, 2005; September 15, 2005; September 29, 2005) on the EAR Document prior to transmittal to City Commission. • City Commission public hearings (November 15, 2005 — November 28, 2005) on the EAR Document prior to transmittal to the Florida Department of Community affairs. DOD /SAY E: \Comm Items\2005\1 1-1 5-05\EAR Summary Citizen Input Report.doc 1 2 ORDINANCE NO. 3 4 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY 5 OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, ADOPTING AND TRANSMITTING THE 2005 6 EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT OF THE CITY'S 7 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT AND REQUESTING 8 THAT THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DELEGATE 9 THE SUFFICIENCY REVIEW OF THE EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL 10 REPORT (EAR) OF THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO THE SOUTH 11 FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL (SFRPC) PURSUANT TO THE 12 PROVISIONS OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE 13 PLANNING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ACT; PROVIDING 14 FOR SEVERABILTY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND 15 PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE 16 17 WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance 3 -89 -1989 the City Commission adopted its 18 Comprehensive Plan according to the requirements of Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, 19 known as the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation 20 Act, and 21 22 WHEREAS, the South Miami Planning Board has been designated as the Local Planning 23 Agency for the City pursuant to Section 163.3174, Florida Statutes; and 24 25 WHEREAS, the South Miami Planning Department has prepared a draft 2005 26 Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report; and 27 28 WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency held public hearings on August 30, 2005, 29 September 15, 2005 and September 29, 2005 to review and receive comments on the draft 2005 30 Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR); and 31 32 WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency at its September 29, 2005 meeting adopted a 33 motion by a vote of 6 ayes 0 nays recommending transmittal to the City Commission; and 34 35 WHEREAS, the City of South Miami desires to transmit the draft 2005 Comprehensive 36 Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report for preliminary review and comment, prior to adopting the 37 Report in final form; and 38 39 WHEREAS, Florida Statutes § 163.3191(8) allows the Florida Department of 40 Community Affairs ( "Department" ) to delegate its "authority as the state land planning agency 41 for sufficiency review of EARs to the appropriate regional planning council, while retaining 42 oversight of the process; and 43 44 WHEREAS, the Department entered into such an agreement with the South Florida 45 Regional Planning Council (SFRPC) to review EARs in Miami -Dade County for sufficiency in 46 accordance with the prescribed criteria in Florida Statutes § 163.3191 and Florida Administrative 47 Code R. 9J- 5.005, where the local governing body, by vote of a majority if its membership, 48 requests delegation in writing; and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 (2) WHEREAS, the City of South Miami elects to have its 2005 Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report reviewed for sufficiency by the South Florida Regional Planning Council; and WHEREAS, the City of South Miami City Commission has conducted public hearings on the proposed 2005 Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, THAT: Section 1: The South Miami City Commission adopts for purposes of transmittal to the State the draft 2005 Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report as submitted and amended by the City's Local Planning Agency. Section 2.The South Miami City Commission hereby requests that the Florida Department of Community Affairs delegate the sufficiency review of its Evaluation and Appraisal Report of the City's Comprehensive Plan to the South Florida Regional Planning Council pursuant to and in accordance with Section 163.3191, Florida Statutes. Section 3. If any section, clause, sentence or phrase of this ordinance is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, the holding shall in no way affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 4. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed. Section 5. This ordinance shall take effect immediately at the time of its passage. PASSED AND ADOPTED this ATTEST: CITY CLERK day of , 2005 APPROVED: 1 st Reading - 2" d Reading - MAYOR 1 2 (3) 3 4 5 6 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: 7 8 9 10 11 12 CITY ATTORNEY 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44EA Comm Items\2005\1 1- 1 5-05\Evaluation & Appraisal- Ord.doc 45 46 47 COMMISSION VOTE: Mayor Russell: Vice Mayor Palmer: Commissioner Wiscombe: Commissioner Birts- Cooper: Commissioner Sherar: SOUr� o -�„ -A DRAFT U -� � INCORPORATED � 1927 t O RYA CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING BOARD Regular Meeting Action Summary Minutes Thursday, September 29, 2005 City Commission Chambers 7:30 P.M. L Call to Order and the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag Action: The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. Action: The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison. II. Roll Call. Action: Mr. Morton, Chairperson, requested a roll call. Board members present constituting a quorum: Mr. Morton, Ms. Yates, Mr. Liddy, Mr. Comendeiro, Mr. Illas, and Mr. Mann. Board members absent: None City staff present: R. Don O'Donniley, AICP (Planning Director) Sanford A. Youkilis, AICP (Planning Consultant), Gremaf Reyes (Video Support), and Patricia E. Lauderman (Planning Board Secretary). Consultants: Bell David Planning Group, Inc. III. Administrative Matters Staff informed the Board that the meeting minutes will be distributed at the next Planning Board meeting. IV. Local Planning Agency (Planning Board) Public Hearing A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, ADOPTING AND TRANSMITTING THE 2005 EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT OF THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT AND REQUESTING THAT THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DELEGATE THE SUFFICIENCY REVIEW OF THE EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) OF THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING Planning Board Meeting September 29, 2005 Page 2 of 5 COUNCIL (SFRPC) PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ACT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. At this point, Board member Mr. Mann entered the meeting. Action: Mr. Morton read the resolution into the record. Mr. O'Donniley informed the Board that Mr. Jay Beckman had been granted additional time because he is representing the South Miami Homeowners Association and will be presenting his response to the EAR including the Addendums from the EAR consultants. Mr. Jay Beckman began to explain his review of the proposed changes found in the EAR report. On page 9, paragraph 2, line 13 he suggested deleting the sentence starting on line 13. He indicated that in the SW 62nd Avenue Charrette, anchored retail centers and corner store /gas station work but small strips of neighborhood retail don't seem to work as well. Next, he discussed the South Miami Homeowners recommendations that pertained to, Table A.2 Potential Future Land Use Plan Map and Zoning map Amendments. Chairman Mr. Morton opened the public hearing. Speakers: NAME ADDRESS SUPPORT /OPPOSE Michael Miller neutral Mr. Miller expressed concern for his building because if there was to be a fire he would want his present permitted use to be protected therefore, he re- stated his request to legalize his non - conforming use. In addition, he indicated his interest in wanting a permitted use category that allows mortgage company, ad agency and public relations. Jorge Milian neutral Mr. Milian stated he did not want more than 2 stories in the neighborhood he lives in which is SW 62nd Avenue. Yvonne Beckman neutral Ms. Beckman stated to the Board no more than 2 stories should be allowed next to residential neighborhood and noted than No. 9 encroached into the neighborhood. Tucker Gibbs, Esq neutral Mr. Gibbs urged the Board on No 9. to make it clear that office setbacks should not come closer to single - family residential and that better buffering be required. Beth Schwartz neutral Ms. Schwartz stressed to the Board that along SW 62nd Avenue there should not be more than two stories. In addition, she indicated that the newspaper business on SW 62nd Avenue is light industrial but should not have other uses allowed there. Sharon McCain neutral Ms. McCain stated her concern of rezoning 3 or 4 properties from single - family residential to townhouse residential because it could create higher density. Chairman Morton closed the hearing. Planning Board Meeting September 29, 2005 Page 3 of 5 Chairman Morton expressed his appreciation to the consultants for their work on the EAR. The Board proceeded to make separate motions on Potential Future Land Use Map and Zoning Map Amendments found in Table II.A.2. (page 12). Motion: Area No. 1 - Mr. Mann moved to approve original recommendation of 2 stories of mixed use and a rear setback but not PUD. Mr. Illas seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes 5 Nays I (Mr. Comendeiro) Motion: Area No. 2 - Mr. Comendeiro motioned to approve the Planned Unit Development with a two -story limitation and delete the mixed -use. Mr. Illas seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes 4 Nays 2 (Mr. Morton, Mr. Liddy) Motion: Area No. 3 — Mr. Illas moved to approve as drafted. Mr. Mann seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes 6 Nays 0 Motion: Area No. 4 - Mr. Comendeiro moved to remove this area from further study. Mr. Illas seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes 5 Opposed 1 (Ms. Yates) Motion: Area No. 5 - Mr. Liddy motioned to study this area further as a possible "TODD - MU-4" zone change. Mr. Illas seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes 5 Nays 1 (Mr. Mann) Motion: Area No. 6 - Mr. Comendeiro moved to approve as drafted. Mr. Mann seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes 6 Nays 0 Motion: Area No. 7 - Mr. Comendeiro moved to approve as drafted. Ms. Yates seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes 6 Nays 0 Motion: Area No. 8 - Mr. Comendeiro moved to approve as drafted. Ms. Yates seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes 6 Nays 0 Motion: Area No. 9 - Mr. Comendeiro motioned to maintain "RS -3" and study the eastside of 57 Ct as a buffer and to eliminate consideration of an "RO" land use or zoning for the area. Mr. Illas seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes 3 Nays 3 (Mr. Morton, Mr. Mann, Mr. Liddy) Motion: Area No. 10 - Mr. Liddy moved to add on No. 10 All America Park as FLU Category Parks and Recreation and it be shown on map as 1OB and Van Smith Park as I OA. Mann seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes 6 Nays 0 Planning Board Meeting September 29, 2005 Page 4of5 Motion: Area No. 11 - Mr. Illas motioned to remove Area No. 11 from the report. Mr. Mann seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes 6 Nays 0 Motion: Area No. 12 Mr. Mann moved to accept this area for study, including possible townhouse development but do not add back the lots at the northwest corner of SW 80' St and SW 67'h Ave and that no further study is done on the lots. Mr. Liddy seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes 6 Nays 0 Motion: Area No. 13 Mr. Liddy moved to remove Area No. 13 from the report. Mr. Mann seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes 6 Nays 0 Motion: Area No. 14 Mr. Mann motioned for approval to study RM -24. Ms. Yates seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes 3 Nays 3 (Mr. Liddy, Mr. Mann, Mr. Illas) At this point the Board and staff addressed comments found in the 9/20/05 South Miami Homeowners Association Report submitted by Mr. Beckman. In reference to Item No. B16. Mr. Beckman proposed changing the Mixed -Use Commercial Residential Future Land Use north of SW 64 Street to Single - family Residential. Staff responded that this northern area is part of the Madison Square Plan and that the proposed change can not be supported, as it is contrary to adopted Planning Board and City Commission policy. After discussion on Item No. B 16. Motion: Mr. Comendeiro moved to add this area to the Madison Square Area recommendation (No. 2) on page 12. Ms. Yates seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes 6 Opposed 0 The Board and staff addressed the "Future Land Use Element Recommendations" found on pages 146 -161 and then responded to the comments submitted in the South Miami Homeowners Association document. The Board made suggestions as follows: LU -1: remove "businesses" LU -4: add "retail or business oriented" and remove "last phase" LU -11: remove strikethrough after "unless such rezoning" LU -20: remove the entire statement LU -23: reword in such a way to eliminate "approaching the maximum" LU -24: replace "single family" with "single dwelling" (this item eliminated, as it duplicates LU -23) T -8: no change T -10: no change Planning Board Meeting September 29, 2005 Page 5 of 5 T -12: no change T -14: replace in the second sentence the word "shall" with "may" T -15: no change T -19: no change H -2: no change H -5: no change The Board decided to make a decision on the entire EAR report. Motion: Mr. Illas moved to approve the EAR report as modified. Ms. Yates seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes 6 Nays 0 V. Remarks No remarks were said. VI. Next Meeting Action: Mr. Youkilis informed the Board the next Planning Board meeting will be held on Tuesday, October 25, 2005 at 7:30pm. VII. Adjournment Action: There being no further business before the Board, Mr. Morton adjourned the meeting at 10:30 PM. SAY K:\PB\PB Minutes\2005 Minutes\PB MINS 9- 29- 05.doc SMART :- .. .- - . . _ ....... j BQ ' HOW TO REACH YOUR GOVERNMENT CORAL GABLES CITY COMMISSION e Mayor Don -Sle! nick: 305- 460 -5220, I donslesnick @cbralgables.com I af Vice -Mayor Marla Anderson: 305- 460 -5223, }manderson @cQralgables.com a Commissioner Wiiel °Ralph' Cabrera, Jr.: ! 305 - 569 71817, rcabrera @coralgables com o Commissioner William H Kerdyk, Jr.: 305 - 569 -1817, wkerdyk@coraigables.com 1 o Commissioner Wayne E. `Chip' Withers: 305- 460 -5323, wwithers@coralgables.com I e City Attorney Elizabeth M. Hernandez: 305 7460 -5219 I m City Clerk Walter Foeman, 305- 460 -5208 -o City Manager David .L. Brown- 305 -460 5201 i CITY DEPARTMENTS o building and Zoning ,305- 460 -5235 a City Hall: 305- 446 -6800 e City Hall Annex: 305 -460 -5000 j 0 Finance: 305-460-5276 a Parking. 305-460-5540 ' e Parks and Recreation: 305-460-5K0 I o police and Fire: 305-442-1600 o public Service: 305- 460 -5131 i oPublic Works: 305- 460 -5000 Youth Center: 305 - 460 -5600 Maintenance Facilities: 305- 460 -5040 a Hearing or Speech Impaired Telecommunication TTY /T D D: 305-460-5010 We take the a comics very seriously.. t nat s why you'll find all your'favorites in The Herald. pFlp ��ppI� p �a 5 MLEPMEIIOTRAINEO, I © ® ® i TRI UQU®RADSi q nrpppxlpart�ypm ^mvp ®A� nNN.LITEMS INSTOCR' q,�Bplg�Uppp lg\\ Auenrcunety oenom msr ! u nu uv nu fdl ®T Ski.., : a 11 I V �9686TW �f � ..� a� �- �TAVO >. 39RI8iN0iF WACTT ee FREE ® H EL3 F ®rs TV1vmT » 9 ETEL ONE OObV4B�CAD9CO ALL FLAVOII3 , 75 FROM SICILIA $ 190750 1 $ Il� °Bt.,s tr ��� Oniu.0 NERO AB SLUT GOOD CUST01�(R CARS L OAIilWLA ®MI(VIWlilf ALL LFLA -VOHS CA61g0 eCLa¢8 $�go IL s BRUT 4�3�B0ta5 ®EWAPB'S 150 $� SIC" soV 00111A �`� °0t,s ECC® QiJ66AC -0� G Ev G ®9sE DO!! N! Slcw ®,.7a L 8�5 ®i5a �1�9 ®YI161lAl0 ��E�IY %WIW�E s�gag �A a ee V43EGRO � �Io�i�� ��iil�� (� 750 JIM BEAM Y�AO ooLLOW 750 ) o 5a' CHARD 69ALOWWV'� $2-59 1.75 1.75 $ 309 E..!$&00 Mall -In n.bale75 �� 750 AlII STOLICHNAYA 1.75 $28.99 CHIVAS 750 $25.99 JACI( DANIELS 1.75: $29.99 7 CROWN 1.75 $10.99 TWIIIO A FRIG 1.75 $23.99 GLENLIVET 750 $27.99 MAI(ERSMARX 750 $20.99 SEAGRAMSV01.75$20,99 THE RED 750 CITADELLE ` 750 $24.99 GRANTS ITR $15.99 WILUTURI(EY101.750 $18.99 CANADIAN LTD 1.75 $1199 $ j :99� SUOL 1.75 $10.99 FAMOUS GROUSE 1.75 $26.99 JOHN JAMESON 750 $19.99 CANADIAN MIST1.75 $15.99 750 n - LIONT O: DARK " X751 $18891.75 175 ^19,99 HENNESSYVS 750 $2699 'LAVORS750 11 ^99 COURVOISIERVS 750 $23.99 e 750 115.99. LANDY'aVSOP 750 $24.99 - RUFFIND GORDON'S 1.75 $14.99 CHIANTI SEAGRAMS 1.75 $18.99 $790 BEEFEATER 1.75 $28.99 750 BOMBAY 1.75 $29.99 STOCK f 887013 UnDRA ®QIYII IVINO MADE . $9_9)°°t:ts TVBEdI E3 IGELICOLI0 750$19 ^99 750 a THREE OLIVES v ®matia ��aa}} �j Sesr ®'91.75 WAV)W08WC8lTA MOT J .D WALC6E&S ONCIB B BB 8 0 LIONT O: DARK " X751 $18891.75 175 ^19,99 HENNESSYVS 750 $2699 'LAVORS750 11 ^99 COURVOISIERVS 750 $23.99 e 750 115.99. LANDY'aVSOP 750 $24.99 IL Il r ,5a7 1.75 M117A COLD On RICH to �� LTP GCIg RESER E zrk 9000YWOI816A $T. MARTIN ANEJO CS,30a71! CHARD, MERLOT Qrm 1 •JOSEINIERO000LD $0)889 odW ,n Pj1U m Lg9 LLaL N4fl .� - Ft,W �HMAMI es, au �S1J - IIII' R.PIDDEBDA11 HUIFAH DEERFELDBCH ' MPMI HOLLYWOODm NVOALE SDBFSDE F[I AODEDAE l4lAM POMPMIO h ' '., 959STATEBO81 1550W84@SL 2ENI E2,6a 21216/168 ¢IafNry: 94948ulilgAu¢,: 5450N,SII¢8tl.1 I$OBscaM¢BNd, 2�lEBIaIhIBNd. - s. ' it 954.463.1164 3055588115 9544213920 305445.2132 95496h9486 3058910131 9544582551: 3058668667- 954133.0500 ID5.751.9114 9S4.1825095 OOURTFESY NOTICE �s CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA ® • , Admission Showcase On Tuesday, November 15, 2005, beginning at 7:30 p.m., in the City_ °F b Commission Chambers, 6130 Sunset Drive, the City Commission will hold Public Hearings to consider the following Items: Xquallty education that is distinctly`Christian. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO 4 �x Sri PURCHASE A 2006 REAR STEER LOADER KNUCKLE BOOM q CRANE /LOADER), A 2006 26 -CUBIC YARD TRASH TRUCK n ��� find ®dO{ ®H/�Jo AND A 2005 UTILITY TRUCK, AT A TOTAL COST OF a T $ F P! $225,376.09 WITH THE FIRST YEAR'S INSTALLMENT %n�4 PAYMENT OF FIVE PAYMENTS NOT TO EXCEED $45,075.22 r Thursday, 6855 SW 1:52 Street' , '8 TO BE CHARGED TO THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT a = November 10 Palmetto Bay ��n O�M`Y7�§ ACCOUNT. 4:0 p.m. (305) 233 -2030 x241 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY- MANAGER TO, ENTER INTO A FIVE YEAR AGREEMENT WITH y www.wcsmiaml org �c� THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP. FOR MAINTENANCE OF ELEVATORS FOR THE AMOUNT OF $20,100 WITH THE FY" 2005 -06 SERVICE FEE OF $4,020 TO BE CHARGED 'TO!�r?4 „ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ACCOUNT. mar Til AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO GARBAGE AND TRASH; r A AMENDING- SECTION 11- 23(a)- OF THE CODE OF- ORDINANCES ENTITLED "REFUSE COLLECTION FEE g- SCHEDULE ", ( AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AND TRANSMITTING THE 2005 � " EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT OF THE CITY'S r L COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT AND m s s 4� « ` � g. REQUESTING THAT THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OFD $ *��� COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DELEGATE THE SUFFICIENCY REVIEW , r OF THE EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) OF THE _ CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO THE SOUTH FLORIDA t z yc "7 fS�j x REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL (SFRPC) PURSUANT TO THE ga I PROVISIONS. OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT �n §ter REGULATIONS ACT. am765E&"",` Inquiries concerning item should be directed to the City Clerk's -'R, , �( i ALL interested 6 parties invited to attend and will be heard, p Maria M. Menendez City Clark��n �$ IRIS, t ' Pursuant to Florida Statutes 286.0105, the City hereby advises the public that If a person decid . to appeal any decision made. by this Board, Agency or commission with respect to any matter considered at Its meeting.or hearing, he or she will need a record of the proceedings, and that for b �5 ,,�°'k�'+' ' �� s �7, ;, t ^•" s� m tW b' '�" x u�` - such purpose, affected person may need, to ensure that a verbatim record of ths'proceedings is made which record Includes the testimony-and evidence upoh.whlchthsappeal Is.to be based. - $ BURG., CHABLIS OR RHINE - 750 $�� :RMEISTER 750 $19.99 Ts 750 $17.99 LTO ON SILVER 750 $36.99 IGELICOLI0 750$19 ^99 BURG., ROSE . OR CHABLIS �I 3AA99INO IL Il r ,5a7 1.75 M117A COLD On RICH to �� LTP GCIg RESER E zrk 9000YWOI816A $T. MARTIN ANEJO CS,30a71! CHARD, MERLOT Qrm 1 •JOSEINIERO000LD $0)889 odW ,n Pj1U m Lg9 LLaL N4fl .� - Ft,W �HMAMI es, au �S1J - IIII' R.PIDDEBDA11 HUIFAH DEERFELDBCH ' MPMI HOLLYWOODm NVOALE SDBFSDE F[I AODEDAE l4lAM POMPMIO h ' '., 959STATEBO81 1550W84@SL 2ENI E2,6a 21216/168 ¢IafNry: 94948ulilgAu¢,: 5450N,SII¢8tl.1 I$OBscaM¢BNd, 2�lEBIaIhIBNd. - s. ' it 954.463.1164 3055588115 9544213920 305445.2132 95496h9486 3058910131 9544582551: 3058668667- 954133.0500 ID5.751.9114 9S4.1825095 OOURTFESY NOTICE �s CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA ® • , Admission Showcase On Tuesday, November 15, 2005, beginning at 7:30 p.m., in the City_ °F b Commission Chambers, 6130 Sunset Drive, the City Commission will hold Public Hearings to consider the following Items: Xquallty education that is distinctly`Christian. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO 4 �x Sri PURCHASE A 2006 REAR STEER LOADER KNUCKLE BOOM q CRANE /LOADER), A 2006 26 -CUBIC YARD TRASH TRUCK n ��� find ®dO{ ®H/�Jo AND A 2005 UTILITY TRUCK, AT A TOTAL COST OF a T $ F P! $225,376.09 WITH THE FIRST YEAR'S INSTALLMENT %n�4 PAYMENT OF FIVE PAYMENTS NOT TO EXCEED $45,075.22 r Thursday, 6855 SW 1:52 Street' , '8 TO BE CHARGED TO THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT a = November 10 Palmetto Bay ��n O�M`Y7�§ ACCOUNT. 4:0 p.m. (305) 233 -2030 x241 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY- MANAGER TO, ENTER INTO A FIVE YEAR AGREEMENT WITH y www.wcsmiaml org �c� THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP. FOR MAINTENANCE OF ELEVATORS FOR THE AMOUNT OF $20,100 WITH THE FY" 2005 -06 SERVICE FEE OF $4,020 TO BE CHARGED 'TO!�r?4 „ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ACCOUNT. mar Til AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO GARBAGE AND TRASH; r A AMENDING- SECTION 11- 23(a)- OF THE CODE OF- ORDINANCES ENTITLED "REFUSE COLLECTION FEE g- SCHEDULE ", ( AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AND TRANSMITTING THE 2005 � " EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT OF THE CITY'S r L COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT AND m s s 4� « ` � g. REQUESTING THAT THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OFD $ *��� COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DELEGATE THE SUFFICIENCY REVIEW , r OF THE EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) OF THE _ CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO THE SOUTH FLORIDA t z yc "7 fS�j x REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL (SFRPC) PURSUANT TO THE ga I PROVISIONS. OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT �n §ter REGULATIONS ACT. am765E&"",` Inquiries concerning item should be directed to the City Clerk's -'R, , �( i ALL interested 6 parties invited to attend and will be heard, p Maria M. Menendez City Clark��n �$ IRIS, t ' Pursuant to Florida Statutes 286.0105, the City hereby advises the public that If a person decid . to appeal any decision made. by this Board, Agency or commission with respect to any matter considered at Its meeting.or hearing, he or she will need a record of the proceedings, and that for b �5 ,,�°'k�'+' ' �� s �7, ;, t ^•" s� m tW b' '�" x u�` - such purpose, affected person may need, to ensure that a verbatim record of ths'proceedings is made which record Includes the testimony-and evidence upoh.whlchthsappeal Is.to be based.