Loading...
05-03-05 Item 1b'`. 1 City of South Miami 2 Special City Commission Minutes 3 March 28, 2005 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 CALL TO ORDER: The City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida met in special session on Monday, March 28, 2005, beginning at 7:00 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, 6130 Sunset Drive. A. Roll Call: The following members of the City Commission were present: Mayor Mary Scott Russell, Vice Mayor Velma Palmer, and, Commissioners Marie Birts- Cooper, Randy G. Wiscombe and Craig Z. Sherar. Also in attendance were: City Attorney Luis Figueredo, City Manager Maria V. Davis and City Clerk Maria M. Menendez. B. Invocation: The invocation was delivered in silence. C. Pledge of Allegiance: The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison. ITEMS(S) FOR THE COMMISSION'S CONSIDERATION: Minutes of March 7, 2005 Moved by Commissioner Wiscombe, seconded by Commissioner Birts- Cooper, the motion to approve the minutes passed by a 5 -0 vote: Commissioner Wiscombe: Yea Commissioner Sherar: Yea Vice Mayor Palmer: Yea Commissioner Birts- Cooper: Yea Mayor Russell: Yea ORDINANCE (S) SECOND READING PUBLIC HEARING (S) 1. AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO A REQUEST TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL - ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION MINUTES - March 28, 2005 1 1 MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY CHANGING THE ZONING USE 2 DISTRICT FROM "TODD(MU -4) ", TRANSIT ORIENTED 3 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (MIXED USE -4) TO "PUD -M" PLANNED 4 UNIT DEVELOPMENT MIXED USE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5 6600 -6640 SW 57 AVENUE AND 5757 SW 68 STREET; THE 6 PURPOSE OF THE ZONE CHANGE IS TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF 7 A MIXED USE PROJECT CONSISTING OF MULTI - FAMILY 8 RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, RETAIL USES AND A PARKING 9 GARAGE; SETTING FORTH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RELATED TO 10 THE DETERMINATION OF CONCURRENCY; PROVIDING FOR 11 SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND 12 PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 4/5 13 Deferred 11116104 & 03107105) 14 (City Manager) Moved by Commissioner Sherar, seconded by Commissioner Birts- Cooper to approve this item. Mr. O'Donniley presented this item by explaining that this is for the zone change from the TODD (MU -4) to the PUD -M, and went over the summary of request from the staff's report. After the presentation from staff, City Attorney Figueredo swore in speakers and the Mayor opened the floor for public hearing. Mr. Proctor, attorney for the applicant, presented the request. He said that they are in agreement with the staff's recommendations; with the requirements in terms of concurrency, including the parkland requirement; in agreement with the offer that they made verbally at a previous meeting regarding affordable housing and that it has been added in writing in the Development Agreement. He then explained that the PUD -M gives the City the opportunity to bind the development of this property to a specific site plan; to remove the specter of an eight -story plan; to remove the specter that is in our Code for TODD, but not for PUD, relating to certain lot coverage bonuses; FAR bonuses; parking below the code. He then referred to a survey that they submitted showing a pedestrian entrance point to the project on SW 68th Street, and the distance to the property line and Metrorail, just south of SW 70th Street, going along Commerce Lane; that survey substantiates that they are within 1200 sq.ft. from Metrorail. He also said that this project has two other entrance points, one on Red Road and one on SW 66th Street, both of which are more than 1200 ft. from Metrorail. He said that they comply with both the former code and the recently amended code. SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION 2 MINUTES —March 28, 2005 Cathy McCann said that she sees no rationale as to why this density should be increased from 266 to 409. She said that the Zoning Task Force made various recommendations which were never enacted. She then asked the Commission to vote no on this item. David Tucker, Sr. expressed concern with the possible increase in traffic and the ingress and egress of the property. He said that there will need to be a genuine concern for the realignment of the traffic arrangement; not just the traffic signals but also the markings. Yvonne Beckman asked for denial of the request saying that it sounds to her as contract zoning and that we should stick to our rules. She said that maybe a Home Depot or a Target will not be so bad for the City. Mayor Russell asked Mr. O'Donniley to talk about the revenues that this project represents to the City, at the appropriate time this evening. Cal Rosenbaum spoke in support of this project... inaudible... Jay Beckman spoke on behalf of the SMHOA who endorses this project and also for himself, and briefly went over the facts that led up to that endorsement. The applicant has come up with a project to implement the future land use designation that the City has applied to this land and they have asked for a zoning change to do that. He referred to page 17 of the Comp Plan saying that this applicant has the right to ask for a zoning change as long as he is compatible with the surrounding area, and he has done so. He said that he attended every meeting pertaining to this project and there has been no evidence given at any of the hearings that there is a compatibility problem. The predominant residential use on this site is compatible with the area, particularly with the adjacent single- family neighborhood; the building heights are proper for the area; the buffer to the single- family residential zone is compatible and very similar to what the residents have proposed; there will be a decrease in peak -hour traffic; the parking is all onsite and there is plenty of it; the site plan is well done and there is no problem with it; this is a high quality development and it will be an asset to the City. For all of these reasons, he concluded, they are endorsing this project and urged the Commission to pass the zoning change. Sharon McCain expressed concern it does not really explain anything. is nothing else but dormitories Miami...... inaudible... SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION 3 MINUTES - March 28, 2005 with the survey saying that She said that this project for the University of Commissioner Sherar said that he had a problem with the survey because of the discrepancy with the figures on this one with respect to the previous survey. He said that the main issue that he has is that the regulations provide that the closest major entrance to any proposed PUD -M development shall not be less than 1200 ft. from the Metrorail Station. Mr. O'Donniley indicated that he believes that the point they chose for measuring is the appropriate place to measure it; they did not change anything to get a result. The discussion then centered on which would be the major entrance to the building to take the measurement. Mr. Proctor said that when they instructed the surveyor, they looked at the various points in the property; they looked where pedestrians could enter the property, because the Code says "pedestrian entry." The closest pedestrian point is farther west, along the western end of the project, but they decided to tell him, in an abundance of caution, to survey to 68 Street from Metrorail; survey towards the eastern part of that building that they are proposing; survey to the where pedestrian could enter and where there is some sort of common pedestrian entrance to the property. City Attorney Figueredo said, that the first issue that we need to address is the definition of major entrance. He said that his initial read of the Code was that the whole focal point of this requirement is to encourage pedestrian movement; he did not read it as the entrance to the building, but rather, as the entrance to the overall project. He said that for this as well as for any future projects, it is important that we apply this interpretation uniformly. Eric Garcia, with the applicant's team, said that their interpretation was always that the pedestrian entry was the side; and since the project is residential in nature, all these buildings will be pedestrian sidewalks. Mr. O'Donniley said that to him, the major entrance of this project has always been the pedestrian one along 68th. He said that to try to find other entry point is not looking at it in its whole context. The intent is that in general, this project be pedestrian accessible. Mr. Proctor said that he believes that they have complied with the ordinance as presented. He said that he believes that they will be able to provide a major entrance. Mayor Russell asked Counsel Figueredo whether the survey determines that this is legally sufficient to meet the Code. SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION 4 MINUTES - March 28, 2005 Counsel Figueredo said that it all depends on the interpretation of major entrances; if you are satisfied with the Planning Director's testimony, that in his opinion it is geared towards providing major access to pedestrians and his interpretation of the Code; and that the measurement of the survey satisfies as major entrance, then you have competent, substantial evidence in the record to make a ruling. Commissioner Wiscombe said that he does not have any problem with them putting a lobby entrance next to the staircase. Mayor Russell said that any amendment should be made here and /or on the site plan because the Development Agreement will not be reviewed by the ERPB, just these two items. Mr. O'Donniley said that one of the conditions is that there has to be approval by the ERPB. Commissioner Wiscombe said that the only problem is that they do not sit with the ERPB and it is open to interpretation. After a five - minute break the meeting reconvened. Mr. Proctor, after some discussion with his team, including the surveyor, said that they had looked at various distances, in particular the entry point to the property that the Commission has been discussing. The surveyor, Mr. Sosa, then walked up to the dais to continue the discussion; he marked the distance in pink on the survey, said that he would be willing to put his seal on it and Commissioner Sherar said that this should be part of the record for future reference. Commissioner Sherar said that based on the surveyor's representation of that point to the driveway that there are 1200 ft from the property line to the Metrorail Station, he does not see that there is a problem. He has certified that there are 1200 ft and that he will accept that the driveway is a major entrance to the development. Vice Mayor Palmer said that Mr. Proctor and his team have made a lot of modifications and that she commends them for their real commitment; however, from the very beginning she stated where she stands, she said, and that she had asked whether the project could be scaled back because she does not think that they should have it the size they are proposing. She said that when she ran for office, she promised that she would encourage developments that are compatible with the whole neighborhood of the City. She said that all the communities that have upzoned are complaining because of the mistake they have made. She said that she is concerned about what we are SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION 5 MINUTES - March 28, 2005 giving up in terms of what we are receiving. She said that she is not voting for 409, maybe for 309. The quality of life is very important here and the people who live here have lived here for a long time, and we need to preserve that. These changes will affect the area in every aspect. If the project is not going to be scaled back she is not going to support it. Commissioner Sherar said that he wished that the Comp Plan were a little clearer, and that he hopes that through the EAR process we do that. He said that the PUD -M, as the project that has been presented here, meets the criteria for satisfying goal 1 of the Comp Plan use plan. To address Commissioner Sherar's concern about the unity of title, Mr. Figueredo explained that the actual building permits will not be issued until the unity of title is presented. Moved by Commissioner Sherar, seconded by Mayor Russell, the motion to table this item passed by a 4 -1 vote: Commissioner Wiscombe: Yea Commissioner Sherar: Yea Vice Mayor Palmer: Nay Commissioner Birts - Cooper: Yea Mayor Russell: Yea At this point Vice Mayor Palmer asked Mr. Price whether the same question she asked Mr. Proctor before, if they would consider rolling back the project. He said that they would like to hear what the comments are about the Development Agreement and then they will be able to respond better to her question. 2. AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA ADOPTING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO FLORIDA STATE STATUE 163.3221 FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT -MIXED USE PROJECT KNOWN AS RED ROAD COMMONS LOCATED AT 6600 -6640 SW 57 AVENUE AND 5757 SW 68 STREET; THE DEVELOPMENT WILL INCLUDE BUILDINGS OF UP TO FIVE (5) STORIES IN HEIGHT AND THE FOLLOWING USES: UP TO 409 MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS, RETAIL USES, OFFICE USES AND A PARKING GARAGE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 (City Manager) 46 47 Moved by Commissioner Sherar, seconded by Commissioner 48 Wiscombe to approve this item. SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION 6 MINUTES - March 28, 2005 Mr. O'Donniley said that many of the changes requested by the Commission have been addressed by the developer. Some of the major changes were specifically relating to low income housing where they agree to a maximum of 10 percent of the units for moderate income. Commissioner Wiscombe pointed out that he would like to have that language to indicate "a requirement of 10 percent..." Park concurrency was the other big issue, Mr. O'Donniley continued, and the applicant agrees to a total of $838,000 in one lump -sum upon the issuance of the first building permit (ld). The third important issue was the ingress /egress on the north exit (5d). There was also a Commission's request that one stop of the shuttle be provided onsite (5e) . And, that the parking spaces on SW 66 Street be eliminated (5q). Mr. Proctor also mentioned the added language under the Housing section, providing that the City shall allow minor deviations resulting from short -term vacancies. He also referred to an issue raised by Commissioner Sherar at the last hearing that would construe the agreement against the applicant, rather than mutually with the parties (19) . He also said that with the help of the City they have drafted some provisions that require them to hire people from within the community while the project is being built during the period of construction and development, which he hopes it will be within the next 18 months; they also have a provision notifying City residents, and the CRA area in particular, when they have bids for construction work on the property; for maintenance; for leasing space for the retail portion in front, and to make their first priority to notify the residents and the potential merchants that live in the community. He said that they have addressed all phases, what happens while the project is being built and what happens after it gets built. At this point the Mayor opened the floor for public hearing. David Tucker Sr. said that he was pleased to hear about the traffic control changes that are possible. About work opportunity he said that he would be willing to share his expertise in organizing a committee to assist with the job opportunities relating to this project. William Hartner, a resident of Coral Gables, said that Red Road is a historical road and modifications are not allowed; half of that road happens to belong to the City of Coral Gables, therefore they will also have their say in the approval of any changes to that road. He said that according to his experience in being involved with the City of Coral Gables in SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION 7 MINUTES - March 28, 2005 projects such as this one, approximately 17,000 cars pass through this road in the span of 24 hours. Bob Welsh said that in reference to the $100,000 that the applicant will be giving to the City, he said that this money is going to come from the increase in units that they will be building as the result of the zoning change they are requesting. He said that he has a property on 63rd Court that he would love to increase his units by the same factor, 50 percent. He said that the change would mean to him about $100,000. he said that what he has not heard from Codina is that this change is worth 168 times $100,000, which would be about $20 million. Sharon McCain said that this project is not comparable with the neighborhood and that is does not meet PUD. She also said that it will need sidewalks and that they will have to be handicap accessible. She also submitted an article on the project published in the Miami Herald on March 20, 2005. She added that she believes that there will be an increase in traffic and noise. She urged the Commission to vote against the project. Yvonne Beckman said that affordable housing should be available throughout the City. She said that this seems to her as contract zoning and urged the Commission to stick with the current rules. Tom Nelson, Pastor of the First United Church of South Miami said that even though they are not exactly located in the City they claim it as their home. He said that he looks forward with glee at the opportunity of serving more people. He said that the conversation tonight has been a lot about money but that the joy of the project is that it brings people to South Miami. Cathy McCann said that she is a little confused. She said that they will be increasing density by more than 50 percent. She said that even though they said that traffic will decrease during peak hours, the common sense tells her that it will increase all day long. She said that the City should have published an RFP in order to have been in a better position to negotiate as to what it is really good for the City and to see what somebody else is willing to offer. Cal Rosenbaum said that the Pastor who spoke earlier could not have said it better. We are dealing with people here, and there are more people to be served by this community, and this project, and the Church across the street, and all other churches and synagogues in the area. SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION 8 MINUTES - March 28, 2005 Victor Dover said that he is a designer planning consultant but he is not here in that capacity tonight and is not paid by anyone to be here tonight. He said that he was motivated to speak by the good things that he heard from the applicant tonight about working with the Church on the pedestrian improvements, and putting that in the Development Agreement. He said that the residential development of the type that is being discussed here is very appropriate. He then urged the Commission to approve this project. John E. Smith expressed concern with the site plan and said that an interlocal agreement is needed in terms of providing policing... inaudible... Levy Kelly commended the applicant team for the good project saying that it is a very good idea. Adrian Ellis spoke in support of the development saying that it will be beneficial not only to the immediate area which is the CRA but to the City as a whole. With no more speakers the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Wiscombe referred to the Vice Mayor's previous question to the applicant with regard to density asking whether it would be at all possible to reduce the project. Mr. Proctor said that they cannot reduce density in the manner that has been discussed. Commissioner Wiscombe said to make him an offer. Mr. Proctor said that their offer has been presented. They have a project that complies with every aspect of our Comprehensive Plan; has a designation of TODD which allows up to eight stories; and the master plan says that the City should encourage mixed use and higher density with flexible building heights development in this area. They have about 30 percent open space; they have a density that is barely more than half of the Valencia project; that piece of land not only has a TODD designation, but has a 5 -story utility substation to the west and non - residential uses to the south; and he said that they can only come here tonight with the City's regulations in mind. He said that they have made concessions, they have addressed traffic, housing, workforce, and he believes that they have done a good job addressing those issues. They have no problem with the Development Agreement as written, as modified by staff, as modified by them and to address the issue with the Church and Red Road. However, at this moment they cannot offer anything further. SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION 9 MINUTES - March 28, 2005 Commissioner Wiscombe said that the alternative of having a Home Depot or Publix would be to go through the same problems that the Grove is going through. He then asked the applicant to give him an approximate figure on the number of jobs required to run the project after its completion. The applicant said that with maintenance, leasing, management, and security, it might take about 12 -15 people full time, and there will be other services that will be contracted out. Mr. Proctor said that what they have heard in the community and also from staff is that they need to link some sort of pre - construction activity to some sort of entrepreneurial effort after the project is built. Because the construction provides for temporary employment, they have some sort of business opportunity for ownership, and that is perhaps to have a maintenance team or company to hire. Commissioner Wiscombe then referred to the Hurricane shuttle saying that he would like to require that students use it during the day. Tim Plummer said that he reviewed the University Village traffic study for the City of Coral Gables since he is one of their traffic consultants, and the way they went through that process is that the University had an agreement that they would not provide on- campus parking permits to anyone that lived at University Village. Commissioner Wiscombe said that he is still concerned with the sidewalks in terms of ADA requirements; he said that is going to be an expensive endeavor because that whole area needs to be cleaned up and fixed in order to encourage pedestrian traffic to Metrorail. He asked the City Manager to address this issue. Ms. Davis said that as a municipality, we are required to provide ADA accessibility along main thoroughfares and if we do not have it now, that is something that I need to look at, she added. Mr. O'Donniley said that he has looked all along Commerce and there is a small segment at the north end, right before you get to the site that goes from concrete to what looks like an asphalt pavement section; that particular place may not be in compliance but it is a very small section. Vice Mayor Palmer then referred to the entrepreneurial effort discussed earlier by Mr. Proctor. She said that in order to start a business many things are needed, starting with capital, and for a poor person that is not so easy. She said that even though there may be business opportunities out there, still a lot of people will not be able to take advantage of SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION MINUTES - March 28, 2005 10 them, and that is why she does not sup said that a lot of poor people from this space at Valencia could not do it responsibility that it entails. She said see the project but she reiterated that 409 units, she said that she would vote the impact is too much on this community. port that concept. She area who tried to rent because of all the that she would like to she is not voting for for a smaller number; Commissioner Birts- Cooper said with respect to the Hurricane shuttle that the whole idea of this project, and the Valencia, is to be able to ride the Metrorail to UM and to use the shuttle, and there are plenty of bus and shuttle stops on the other side of Red Road, so it just takes a little bit of walking. Commissioner Wiscombe said that he is trying to encourage the students to ride the shuttles; Commissioner Birts- Cooper said that they have no choice since there is very limited parking at UM. She said that she believes that this is a wonderful project for our neighborhood; she said that she is tired to see what is there now and that we need to look ahead; she said that she much more prefers to see this type of project go up next to where she lives than to see a Publix or a Home Depot. Commissioner Sherar said that for him is enforceability of everybody's promises; he sees a big problem with traffic circulation. He then asked Mr. Proctor whether DOT will have to improve the internal lane coming out on Red Road. Mr. Proctor said that the intention is to have a right -turn lane that goes straight across Levante or right on Red; and a separate left - turn bay so that people that want to go left on Red Road, at where there will be a signal, will have a separate lane and will not have congestion backed up on the project. Mr. Proctor said that if they cannot get signalization at Levante there is no project. Commissioner Sherar also expressed concern about the noise that the project will generate. He then referred to paragraph 25 "Third -Party Beneficiary" he said that he wants to add that the citizens of South Miami can enforce this agreement. Moved by Commissioner Sherar to amend paragraph 25, page 9, to read: This agreement is exclusively for the benefit of the parties and the citizens of South Miami hereto and their Affiliates and it may not be enforced by any party other than the parties to this Agreement and the citizens of South Miami... The motion died for lack of a second. SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION MINUTES - March 28, 2005 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Moved by Commissioner Sherar to add 5(r) to read: The applicant shall provide 1,001 total parking spaces on site and the side of the property abutting Read Road. Moved by Commissioner Wiscombe, seconded by Vice Mayor Palmer, the motion to extend the meeting until 11:30 p.m. passed unanimously by acclamation. Mayor Russell pointed out to Commissioner Sherar that "a parking garage was being left out of the above amendment. Mr. Proctor told Commissioner Sherar if he could try to dissuade him from that train of thought because they have more spaces than the Code requires. He said that they could figure out how many spaces are required for the commercial and how many are required for the residential, and that total is going to be significantly less than 1,001. Commissioner Sherar started again with the proposed amendment as follows: The applicant shall provide 1,001 total parking spaces, which includes a parking garage, a small surface lot, on -site street parking and off -site parking on Red Road only... seconded by Commissioner Wiscombe, the motion to approve the amendment passed by a 5 -0 vote: Commissioner Wiscombe: Yea Commissioner Sherar: Yea Vice Mayor Palmer: Yea Commissioner Birts- Cooper: Yea Mayor Russell: Yea Moved by Commissioner Wiscombe, seconded by Vice Mayor Palmer, to amend section 2(f) Housing —A maxim rt requirement... and ... low income ... the motion to approve this amendment passed by a 5 -0 vote: Commissioner Wiscombe: Yea Commissioner Sherar: Yea Vice Mayor Palmer: Yea Commissioner Birts- Cooper: Yea Mayor Russell: Yea Moved by Commissioner Wiscombe, to amend 2(d) ...the equal to the actual purchase a===; ...the development on of SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION MINUTES - March 28, 2005 Sherar, seconded by Commissioner Applicant agrees to pay an amount price per acre, p to $300,000 per the Property. 12 1 2 Mr. Price presented an argument to this amendment... inaudible... 3 4 Commissioner Sherar said that Mr. Price brought up some 5 valid points, I'm not paying for your parks, and you don't want 6 to pay anymore for your parks than you have to; however, $300,000 7 in today's market is unrealistic, he said. 8 9 The discussion continued with Commissioner Sherar's concern 10 regarding the issue of parkland concurrency. Mr. O'Donniley said 11 that there are some specific remedies under State Law and they 12 include a number of things; one may be to stop issuing 13 certificates of occupancy if we do not come up with the acreage. 14 15 With no further discussion or comments the motion to pass 16 the above amendment failed by a 3 -2 vote: 17 18 Commissioner Wiscombe: Nay 19 Commissioner Sherar: Yea 20 Vice Mayor Palmer: Yea 21 Commissioner Birts- Cooper: Nay 22 Mayor Russell: Nay 23 24 Commissioner Sherar then recommended adopting the same language 25 that was applied to the Bank; however, he said that they should 26 prepare it carefully and that it should not be voted on just by 27 reference. 28 29 Moved by Commissioner Sherar, seconded by Commissioner Wiscombe, 30 the motion to adjourn the meeting passed by a 4 -1 vote: 31 32 Commissioner Wiscombe: Yea 33 Commissioner Sherar: Yea 34 Vice Mayor Palmer: Yea 35 Commissioner Birts- Cooper: Yea 36 Mayor Russell: Nay 37 38 39 The meeting was adjourned and no further action was taken. 40 41 RESOLUTION (S) /PUBLIC HEARING (S) 42 43 3. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE 44 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA APPROVING A MASTER SITE 45 PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY IN A 46 "PUD -M" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MIXED USE ZONING 47 DISTRICT MORE SPECIFICALLY LOCATED AT 6600 -6640 SW 57 48 AVENUE AND 5757 SW 68 STREET; SETTING FORTH CONDITIONS 49 OF APPROVAL RELATED TO SITE, TRAFFIC, SIGNAGE, AND SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION 13 MINUTES - March 28, 2005 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 URBAN DESIGN ISSUES, AND CONSTRUCTION OF APPROPRIATE PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND LANDSCAPING; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Deferred 11116104 & 03107105) 4/5 (City Manager) COMMISSION REMARKS There being no further business to come before this Body, the meeting adjourned at 11:30 p.m. Attest Maria M. Menendez City Clerk SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION MINUTES - March 28, 2005 14 Approved Mary Scott Russell Mayor