The URL can be used to link to this page

03-07-05 Special Item 1Sov7, y South Miami ° r CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 3 *Americac' ., OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER • N�oRPORA.EO INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM 1927 �pR19 2001 To: Honorable Mayor, Vice Mayor Dater March 7, 2005 Commission Members ITEM No. From: Maria Davis Res LDC Rezoning: City Manager TODD(MU -4) to PUD -M: Codina Development Corp. ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO A REQUEST TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY CHANGING THE ZONING USE DISTRICT FROM 11TODD(MU -4)11, TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (MIXED USE -4) TO "PUD -M" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MIXED USE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6600 -6640 SW 57 AVENUE AND 5757 SW 68 STREET; THE PURPOSE OF THE ZONE CHANGE IS TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A MIXED USE PROJECT CONSISTING OF MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, RETAIL USES AND A PARKING GARAGE; SETTING FORTH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RELATED TO THE DETERMINATION OF CONCURRENCY; PROVIDING FOR _ SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. SUMMARY OF REQUEST The applicant, Codina Development Corp., is requesting a rezoning of a seven acre property as legally described above in order to construct a mixed use project including residential buildings, parking and retail uses with 409 dwelling units and 12,476 square feet of commercial space. According to the information submitted with the application, the dwelling unit density will be 58.4 units per acre. The floor area ratio for the total proposed project is listed as 1.54. The complex is to be called "Red Road Commons ". The current zoning on the subject property is "TODD(MU -4)" Transit Oriented Development District (Mixed -Use 4) Use District. The applicant is requesting a zone change for the property to PUD -M, Planned Unit Development -Mixed Use. The current TODD (MU -4) Zoning District permits residential and commercial uses, permits two stories in height and does not limit development with a maximum floor area ratio or units per acre formula. The PUD submission is to be considered in two parts. The first is a zone map change ordinance which creates the PUD -M on the City's official map. Issues such as density, compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, traffic, parking requirements, height of buildings, and concurrency are LDC Rezoning February 23, 2005 Page 2 of 7 dealt with as part of the zone map change. The second part is the applicant's request for approval by resolution of the specific PUD development plan. Specific issues related to building design, landscaping, and other site plan features are dealt with in a companion item. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Planned Unit Development (PUD) is a zoning district which can be applied for and created on the City's official zoning map if a development is to be done as a unit under single ownership and has one or more principal buildings. A PUD encourages design flexibility in location of buildings, open space, and provision of amenities. Development in a PUD district does not follow standard dimensional requirements (setbacks, heights of buildings), floor - area - ratio, or dwelling units per acre. These standards are set forth in advance as part of the submitted master site plan. The following sections of the City's Land Development Code govern the general design, development, and review of a PUD application: Section 20 -3,7 (A) -(B) Planned Unit Development — provides design guidelines for all PUD's regulating density, traffic, screening, off - street parking, service areas, building heights, and pedestrian amenities. Section 20 -3.7 (E) PUD -M, Planned Unit Development- Mixed Use- specific regulations governing uses allowed, minimum development site size and location. PUD -M is one of three PUD types. Section 20 -5.12 Planned Unit Development approvals — sets forth regulations governing the review procedures and submittal requirements for all PUD's. Section 20 -4.1 Adequate public facilities and services (Concurrency)- establishes level of services (LOS) standards for water and sewage, solid waste, traffic, and recreation / open space. These standards are reviewed at the development permit stage for major new construction projects. All of the above LDC sections are attached. SITE ANALYIS The subject property is bounded by SW 68th Street on the south, SW 57th Ave. on the east, SW 66th Street on the north. The west boundary is a FPL transmission facility and a driveway into the City's Community Center. The property is occupied by a parking lot and three one -story buildings used for offices, a real estate school, a foreign consulate, a social service agency and a night club. LDC Rezoning February 23, 2005 Page 3 of 7 Surrounding Parcels DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS 1. Comprehensive Plan: The project site is within the TODD Future Land Use category which encourages a mix of uses. The district was developed to take advantage of its proximity to the Metro Rail. The category allows for flexible building heights up to a maximum of eight (8) stories. The rezoning supports the following Comprehensive Plan goals and policies: HOUSING Goal 1 To assure the availability of sound and affordable housing for all current and future residents of the City of South Miami with special focus on infill and redevelopment ........ Policy 1.3.6 The City and the County will jointly support development in the Rapid Transit Zone in order to encourage mixed -use residential multi family projects ............. LAND USE Policy 2.1.4 Discourage urban commercial sprawl by promoting growth in the core area surrounding the Metro Rail transit station by creating a district for the new growth which is contained and transit- oriented, thereby relieving the pressure for commercial re- zonings outside of this core area Goal To achieve a tax base adequate to support a high level of municipal services via increased mixed -use and flexible building heights in conjunction with a Transit- Oriented Development District [TODD]. 2. Minimum Requirements: The LDC requires that an application for a PUD -M shall be for a project which is on a site of at least 4 acres. The subject application is on a seven acre site. In addition the development site must be within 1200 feet of the Metro Rail station. The Comprehensive Plan Land Development Code Actual Use Existing Land Use Existing Zoning District Category North Single Family Residential RS -4, RM 18 Single Family homes Multifamily Residential Single Family Residential Apartments Low density multi - family East - --- -- - - - -- Church South TODD TODD(LI -4) Light industrial; warehouses, social service agency West Public Institutional PI, Public Institutional; RS -4 FPL Sub station DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS 1. Comprehensive Plan: The project site is within the TODD Future Land Use category which encourages a mix of uses. The district was developed to take advantage of its proximity to the Metro Rail. The category allows for flexible building heights up to a maximum of eight (8) stories. The rezoning supports the following Comprehensive Plan goals and policies: HOUSING Goal 1 To assure the availability of sound and affordable housing for all current and future residents of the City of South Miami with special focus on infill and redevelopment ........ Policy 1.3.6 The City and the County will jointly support development in the Rapid Transit Zone in order to encourage mixed -use residential multi family projects ............. LAND USE Policy 2.1.4 Discourage urban commercial sprawl by promoting growth in the core area surrounding the Metro Rail transit station by creating a district for the new growth which is contained and transit- oriented, thereby relieving the pressure for commercial re- zonings outside of this core area Goal To achieve a tax base adequate to support a high level of municipal services via increased mixed -use and flexible building heights in conjunction with a Transit- Oriented Development District [TODD]. 2. Minimum Requirements: The LDC requires that an application for a PUD -M shall be for a project which is on a site of at least 4 acres. The subject application is on a seven acre site. In addition the development site must be within 1200 feet of the Metro Rail station. The LDC Rezoning February 23, 2005 Page 4 of 7 applicant states that the project site is 1092 feet from the Metro Rail station. 3. Uses Permitted: The PUD -M allows a limited number of uses which are listed in Section 20 -3.7 (E) of the LDC. It includes retail establishments and multi- family residential uses being proposed by the developer. 4. Density- Number of Dwelling Units: The proposed development, as submitted has 409 dwelling units or a density of 58.3 dwelling units per acre. PUD regulations specify that the number of units permitted shall be governed by the Comprehensive Plan land use category in effect for the site. The TODD land use category does not provide limitations on number of units as long as the required parking is provided. 5. Density- Floor Area Ratio: The applicant's proposed floor area ratio is 1.54. PUD regulations specify that intensity or FAR of a project is governed by the Comprehensive Plan land use category in effect for the site. The TODD land use category does not provide a specific FAR limitation. 6. Dwelling Units - Minimum Floor Area: The applicant's proposal indicates a range of dwelling unit types, including 175 one - bedroom units; 201 two- bedroom units; and 31 four bedroom units. The size of the units range from 604 sq. ft. for a one bedroom; 887 and 946 sq. ft. for two bedroom units; 1785 sq. ft. for four bedroom units. 7. Dwelling Units- Minimum Average Size The applicant's proposal provides that the average size for all of the dwelling units is 842 square feet. PUD regulations do not require a minimum average size for dwelling units. As part of the redraft of the LDC, the City's Zoning Task Force recommended that residential developments in this area ( TODD district) must maintain a minimum average dwelling unit size of 800 square feet. It is felt that this standard would assure a quality level of dwelling units in residential projects. 8. Building Height: The applicant is proposing to build a total of six residential buildings The building heights vary. There are four and five story buildings in the south and center part of the development and a four story building facing SW 57 Avenue on the east side. A three story building will face single family homes on the north side with the interior portion of that building being four stories. At the northeast corner is a four story building opposite the existing multi - family complex. A five story parking garage covers most of site on the west side abutting the FPL facility. Current PUD regulations do not specify specific height limits. The Code states that project buildings must take into account surrounding heights of buildings and the limitation on heights set forth in the assigned Comprehensive Plan's land use category (up to eight stories). 9. Parking Requirements: The applicant is providing 1,028 total parking spaces, which includes a parking garage, a small surface lot and on -site street parking. The total number of required parking spaces for the proposed re- zoning (including residential and retail uses) is 948. 10. Affordable Housing: The City of South Miami has made a commitment to support and LDC Rezoning February 23, 2005 Page 5 of 7 encourage the creation of affordable (moderate priced) housing units. The Comprehensive Plan specifically sets forth the following housing policies : Polices The City will support and assist the efforts of private organizations to construct at least five affordable housing units per year. Policy The City and the County will jointly support development in the Rapid Transit Zone in order to encourage mixed - use /residential multi family projects containing affordable housing units. The Red Road Commons project is an excellent opportunity for the City to encourage affordable housing to be built. The developer should be required to commit at least 5% of the units as affordable housing units. 11. Adequate Public Facilities - Concurrence: The applicant's project is above the concurrency threshold limits, thereby requiring an assessment for meeting the level of service (LOS) concurrency standards listed in Section 20 -4.1 of the Land Development Code. For purposes of this report, presented below is a summary of the developers' responsibilities related to concurrency: a) Solid Waste • LOS and capacity to be determined by Miami -Dade County based on capacity of the transfer facility. • Developer to provide copy of contract to the City b) Water and Sewage • LOS and capacity to be determined by Miami -Dade County • Developer to provide evidence of approval of appropriate County and State agencies c) Drainage • Concurrency evidenced by compliance with Florida Building Code and approved by DERM. d) Traffic/Streets • Applicant has submitted a Traffic Impact Study showing reduced PM peak trips after PUD is constructed; and major intersection at LOS - B • Additional traffic counts at certain intersections requested in order to determine needed traffic signalization adjustments or lane improvements • Note: the site is located within a City designated Urban Infill and Redevelopment Area and is exempt from meeting transportation concurrency standards (Comprehensive Plan, p.20.1 and p.33). However, the impact of the proposed development on traffic operations will be covered in the review of the resolution adopting the submitted master site plan. LDC Rezoning February 23, 2005 Page 6 of 7 e) Schools • Project impact to be determined by Public Schools. • Dade County Public Schools has been notified of the project and staff invited to sit with Planning Board at hearing. • The Developer shall provide evidence of assessment or mitigation agreement with Dade County Public Schools. fi Recreation Facilities • Project population estimate- 927 • LOS: City Comprehensive Plan: 4 acres per 1000 population. • Capacity: The City is at capacity. • Project will require the addition of recreation land — estimated 3.7 acres • Developer must specify in a development agreement that within five years he will pay for or produce 3.7 acres of land for public park or recreational purposes. (See attached formula to determine concurrency costs) STAFF OBSERVATIONS The proposed rezoning is consistent with and supports the goals and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan (See No. 1, Development Analysis above). 2. A residential development at this location would take full advantage of being adjacent to the transit station and within walking distance of shops, post office, hospitals, restaurants and other amenities of the downtown area. The use would also provide a transition between lower density residential to the north and commercial development to the south. 3. The property is located in the Community Redevelopment Area. The rezoning is consistent with the goals and objectives of the CRA and the "Hometown Plan Area 2 Report", which calls for mixed use development on this site (p.33). 4. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the recommendations of the Zoning Task Force for this site. In 2002 the Task Force's subcommittee on TODD carried out considerable study on the district. At that time it was recommended that this site be re -zoned to allow 4 stories plus 2 additional stories as a bonus. The recommendation also suggested a height limit of 3 stories across from the residential areas on the north side of the property. The PUD -M re- zoning will allow development as specified in the Master Site Plan as submitted. Buildings indicated at four and five stories on this plan will be approved as part of the master site plan approval. The proposed master site plan will also be approved with a limit of three stories across from the residential areas to the north. 5. The traffic pattern from a residential development is generally more dispersed throughout the day and night and has less impact on peak traffic. Traffic analysis of the current commercial development as compared with the traffic that will be generated by the proposed residential development, indicates that the proposed land use change may actually reduce LDC Rezoning February 23, 2005 Page 7 of 7 peak hour vehicle trips generated by this property. However, certain traffic operations and management adjustments will be addressed in the review of the resolution approving the master site plan. PLANNING BOARD ACTION The Planning Board at its September 27, 2004 meeting adopted a motion by a vote of 5 aye and 1 nay ( Mr. Illas) recommending approval of the requested zone change with the conditions set forth by staff below. The Board strongly suggested that the developer's contribution related to recreation space should be worked out prior to the issuance of a building permit. RECOMMENDATION The City Commission approved the proposed rezoning with four conditions on first reading at its October 19, 2004 meeting. It is recommended that the Commission approve on final reading the proposed rezoning with the following conditions suggested by the Planning Board and updated by staff: (1) The applicant shall execute a Development Agreement which must include the conditions set forth below and in the staff report pertaining to the requested zone map change and shall incorporate all conditions which may be adopted as part of the approval of the project's PUD Master Site Plan (2) Applicant shall include in the Development Agreement: (a) an agreement that within five years the developer will pay for or produce 3.7 acres of land for public park or recreational purposes; (b) an agreement that up to 10% of the multi- family units constructed shall be classified and marketed as affordable housing units and if the project is converted to condominiums the same percentage shall apply; (c) a payment of $100,000 for low income housing to be placed in a trust fund available upon application to not - for - profit low income housing organizations." (3) Applicant shall provide evidence of concurrency compliance by submitting to the City the appropriate documents needed to prove concurrency with water, sewerage, schools, and solid waste. (4) The applicant shall provide to the City a Unity of Title document for the subject development site; the unity of title shall be prepared and filed in accordance with Section 20 -5.16 of the South Miami Land Development Code. Attachments: Draft Ordinance Information Memo on Transportation Concurrency 2 -15 -05 Application/Letter of Intent /Location map Applicable Regulations — PUD, Concurrency Copies of Public Notices Excerpt Planning Board Minutes- 9 -27 -04 Site Plan / Development Plan MD/DOD /SA E: \Comm Items \2005\2 -23 -05 Special\Rezoning TODD to PUD -M Abraham Site.doc South Miami TO: Don O'Donniley DATE: February 15, 2005 FROM: Sanford A. Youkilis RE: Urban Infill / Concurrency Impact on Red Rd Commons This memo is in response to the questions raised at the Feb. 10, 2005 City Commission Workshop on the transportation concurrency status for the Red Road Commons Project. In 1996 as part of a number of EAR revisions to the Comprehensive Plan, the City created a Redevelopment and Infill District (RID). The RID was created in order to eliminate traffic concurrency requirements for traffic impacts on streets within a defined area. The objectives of the RID were listed as part of the Transportation policies on p.65 of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition the boundaries of the RID were delineated on a map (p. 76). The RID did not include the site on which the Red Road Commons Project is proposed. In 1999, the Florida Legislature amended Chapter 163 of Florida Statutes (163.2511- 163.2526) in order to enhance the State's commitment to urban infill and redevelopment. The changes to Chapter 163 recognized the importance of healthy urban cores by creating the "Urban Infill and Redevelopment Areas" concept. The legislation enables redevelopment and renewal of distressed urban cores and creates economic incentives for areas designated as an Urban Infill and Redevelopment Area. The State's concurrency statute was also changed to permit Urban Infill and Redevelopment Areas to also be designated as transportation concurrency exception areas. "Concurrency - 163.3180 (b) A local government may grant an exception from the concurrency requirement for transportation facilities if the proposed development is otherwise consistent with the adopted local government comprehensive plan and is a project that promotes public transportation or is located within an area designated in the comprehensive plan for: 1. Urban infill development, 2. Urban redevelopment, 3. Downtown revitalization, or 4. Urban infill and redevelopment under s. 163.2517. " The South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency determined that the CRA could benefit from potential loans and grants available only to areas designated as an Urban Infill and Redevelopment Area. An application in the form of a Comprehensive Plan amendment was prepared. The City Commission, in November, 2000, adopted the Comprehensive Plan amendment (Ord. No.27 -00 -1729) designating the CRA as an Urban Infill and Redevelopment Area. Both the CRA and the Urban Infill and Redevelopment Area have the same boundaries. The designation is listed as a Land Use policy (Policy 5.2.2; p.21.1) and the boundaries are shown on a map (p.33). As required by statute, the Future Land Use map was amended to show the new Urban Infill and Redevelopment Area boundary. (2) The Florida Department of Community Affairs approved the proposed amendment which designates the CRA as an Urban Infill and Redevelopment Area. (DCA- No.00 -UW. This amendment is in addition to the Redevelopment and Infill District (RID). Thus, both the Redevelopment and Infill District and the Urban Infill and Redevelopment Area are currently in effect. Properties located in the new Urban Infill and Redevelopment Area are also exempt from transportation concurrency requirements.. The exemption area for transportation concurrency authorized by the Urban Infill and Redevelopment Area legislation is a larger area and includes the Red Road Commons Project. SAY E: \Comm Items\2005\2 -23 -05 Special\Memo on Urban Infill Concurrency.doc Figure 1.8 South Maori Co _ . _ __ P Agency Redevelopment Area: ty evelo meet and Urban Hill & Redevelopment Area ,1 South Miami CRA fMRedevelopment Area/ Urban EM & Redeveloprmnt Area City of South Maori Boundary SW 40 Street a� c a� a Ord. No.27 -00 -1729; 11/07;00: DCA No. 00 —UIRI Element 1 .ti Page Number 33 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO A REQUEST TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY CHANGING THE ZONING USE DISTRICT FROM "TODD(MU -4) ", TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (MIXED USE -4) TO "PUD -M" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT -MIXED USE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6600 -6640 SW 57 AVENUE AND 5757 SW 68 STREET; THE PURPOSE OF THE ZONE CHANGE IS TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A MIXED USE PROJECT CONSISTING OF MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, RETAIL USES AND A PARKING GARAGE; SETTING FORTH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RELATED TO THE DETERMINATION OF CONCURRENCY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, Application No. PB- 04 -015A was submitted to the Planning Department by Codina Development Corporation, said application requesting to amend the official zoning map of the City of South Miami by changing the zoning use district for property located at 6600 -6640 SW 57 Avenue and 5757 SW 68 Street from "TODD (MU -4) ", Transit Oriented Development District (Mixed- Use-4) Use District to the "PUD -M" Planned Unit Development - Mixed Use District.; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the change of zoning is to permit construction of a mixed use project including residential buildings, parking and retail uses with 409 dwelling units and 12,476 square feet of commercial space ; and WHEREAS, the proposed rezoning is consistent with the Future Land Use Map of the City of South Miami Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, after review and consideration, the Planning Department recommended approval of the application with conditions; and WHEREAS, on September 27, 2004, after Public Hearing regarding the proposed rezoning application, the Planning Board recommended approval with conditions by a vote of 6 ayes 1 nay; and WHEREAS, the City Commission desires to accept the recommendation of the Planning Board and enact the aforesaid amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1 That the City's Official Zoning Map shall be amended by changing the zoning on properties for, changing the zoning use district for property located at 6600 -6640 SW 57 Avenue and 5757 SW 68 Street from "TODD (MU -4) ", Transit Oriented Development District (Mixed- Use -4) Use District to the "PUD -M" Planned Unit Development - Mixed Use District said rezoning to be subject to the conditions specified in Section 2 of this ordinance. Section 2 That the above change of zoning is subject to the following conditions: 1) Applicant shall submit a Development Agreement which includes: (a) an agreement that within five years the developer will pay for or produce 3.7 acres of land for public park or 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 2 (2) recreational purposes; (b) an agreement that 5% of the multi- family units constructed shall be classified and marketed as affordable housing units. (2) Applicant shall provide evidence of concurrency compliance by submitting to the City the appropriate documents needed to prove concurrency with water, sewerage, schools, and solid waste. (3) The applicant shall provide to the City a Unity of Title document for the subject development site; the unity of title shall be prepared and filed in accordance with Section 20 -5.16 of the South Miami Land Development Code. (4) Additional requirements relating to the approval of the PUD -M Master Site Plan shall be incorporated in the Development Agreement. Section 3 If any section, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, this holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 4 All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 5 This ordinance shall be effective immediately after the adoption hereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED this ATTEST: CITY CLERK 1St Reading — 2" d Reading — READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY day of , 2005 APPROVED: MAYOR COMMISSION VOTE: Mayor Russell: Vice Mayor Palmer: Commissioner Wiscombe: Commissioner Birts- Cooper: Commissioner Sherar EXomm Items \2005\2 -23 -05 Special\Rezoning -TODD to PUD -M Ord.doc ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO A REQUEST TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY CHANGING THE ZONING USE DISTRICT FROM "TODD(MU -4) ", TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (MIXED USE -4) TO "PUD -M" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT -MIXED USE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6600 -6640 SW 57 AVENUE AND 5757 SW 68 STREET; THE PURPOSE OF THE ZONE CHANGE IS TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A MIXED USE PROJECT CONSISTING OF MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, RETAIL USES AND A PARKING GARAGE; SETTING FORTH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RELATED TO THE DETERMINATION OF CONCURRENCY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, Application No. PB- 04 -015A was submitted to the Planning Department by Codina Development Corporation, said application requesting to amend the official zoning map of the City of South Miami by changing the zoning use district for property located at 6600 -6640 SW 57 Avenue and 5757 SW 68 Street from "TODD (MU -4) ", Transit Oriented Development District (Mixed - Use-4) Use District to the "PUD -M" Planned Unit Development - Mixed Use District.; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the change of zoning is to permit construction of a mixed use project including residential buildings, parking and retail uses with 409 dwelling units and 12,476 square feet of commercial space ; and WHEREAS, the proposed rezoning is consistent with the Future Land Use Map of the City of South Miami Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, after review and consideration, the Planning Department recommended approval of the application with conditions; and WHEREAS, on September 27, 2004, after Public Hearing regarding the proposed rezoning application, the Planning Board recommended approval with conditions by a vote of 6 ayes 1 nay; and WHEREAS, the City Commission desires to accept the recommendation of the Planning Board and enact the aforesaid amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1 That the City's Official Zoning Map shall be amended by changing the zoning on properties for, changing the zoning use district for property located at 6600 -6640 SW 57 Avenue and 5757 SW 68 Street from "TODD (MU -4) ", Transit Oriented Development District (Mixed- Use -4) Use District to the "PUD -M" Planned Unit Development - Mixed Use District said rezoning to be subject to the conditions specified in Section 2 of this ordinance. Section 2 That the above change of zoning is subject to the following conditions: 1) Applicant shall submit a Development Agreement which includes: (a) an agreement that within five years the developer will pay for or produce 3.7 acres of land for public park or K (2) recreational purposes; (b) an agreement that 5% of the multi - family units constructed shall be classified and marketed as affordable housing units. (2) Applicant shall provide evidence of concurrency compliance by submitting to the City the appropriate documents needed to prove concurrency with water, sewerage, schools, and solid waste. (3) The applicant shall provide to the City a Unity of Title document for the subject development site; the unity of title shall be prepared and filed in accordance with Section 20 -5.16 of the South Miami Land Development Code. (4) Additional requirements relating to the approval of the PUD -M Master Site Plan shall be incorporated in the Development Agreement. Section 3 If any section, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, this holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 4 All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 5 This ordinance shall be effective immediately after the adoption hereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED this ATTEST: CITY CLERK 1St Reading — 2" d Reading — READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY day of 32005 APPROVED: MAYOR COMMISSION VOTE: Mayor Russell: Vice Mayor Palmer: Commissioner Wiscombe: Commissioner Birts- Cooper: Commissioner Sherar EXomm Items\2005\2 -23 -05 Special \Rezoning -TODD to PUD -M Ord.doc City of South Miami. Planning & Zoning Department City Hall, 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami Florida 33 143'- Telephone: (305) '663 -6326; Fax: (305) 666 -4591 JUL 2 8.2004 Application for Public Hearing Before, Planning Board & City Commission Address of Subject Property:6600 – 6640 SW 57 AVENUE Lot(s) Block Subdivision PB SEE ATTACHED SURVEY Meets & Bounds: Applicant:- Phone: 1x30 52D4 t CODINA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Representative :. Organization: x tw f JERRY B. PROCTOR, ESQ. ' Address: Phone: 200 SO. BISCAYNE BLVD., SUITE 2500 MIAMI; FLORIDA 33131 , Property Owner: Signature,' ANTHONY R. ABRAHAM Mailing Address: Phone:' jds- ..G �s 2 ��z °7 6600 SW 57 AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA 33143 Architect/Engineer: Phone: 305 -666 -5474 .ARTS GARCIA AS THE APPLICANT, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO THIS PROJECT: Owner: X Owner's Representative Contract to purchase Option to purchase. Tenan #/Lessee The undersigned` has read this completed 'application and represents that the information and all submitted materials are true and correct t the best of the app 'cant's knowledge and belief. °rfu * �?kte forryxn Csrppt a-1-t ors . �_ _ _ -- -:Ao cams S� uze and'title.. - - - - -- Upon receipt, applications and all submitted materials will be reviewed for compliance with the Land Development Code and other applicable registrations. Applications found not in compliance will be rejected and returned to the applicant. OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Filed Date of PB Hearing Petition Required Petition Accepted_ Method of Pavment \7319 \137071 # 685595 v 1 7/104 3:48 PM Date of Commission °APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE FOR THE FOLLOWING : - SUBMITTED MATERIALS... PLEASE CHECK THE APPROPRIATE ITEM: P�LEASE CHECK ALL THAT APPLY: Text Amendment to LDC Variance Leiter of intent _ X Zoning- -Map Amendment: ®Special .Use -.... .. :X__�.ustifications- for -chap e- - .;+ 9 X PUD Approval .. ® Special Exception Statement of hardship PUD Major Change. Proof of. ownership or letter from owner —Other Power of attorney Briefly explain application and citespecific Code sections: Contract to purchase SEE ATTACHED LETTER OF INTENT X Current survey (.1 original sealed and signed/1 reduced copy @ 11" x.17') X 7 copies of Site Plan and Floor Plans ® reduced copy @ 11" x 17' 20% Property-owner signatures Mailing labels (3 sets) and map Section: Subsection: Page #: Amended Date: Required Fee(s)' The undersigned` has read this completed 'application and represents that the information and all submitted materials are true and correct t the best of the app 'cant's knowledge and belief. °rfu * �?kte forryxn Csrppt a-1-t ors . �_ _ _ -- -:Ao cams S� uze and'title.. - - - - -- Upon receipt, applications and all submitted materials will be reviewed for compliance with the Land Development Code and other applicable registrations. Applications found not in compliance will be rejected and returned to the applicant. OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Filed Date of PB Hearing Petition Required Petition Accepted_ Method of Pavment \7319 \137071 # 685595 v 1 7/104 3:48 PM Date of Commission City of South Miami Planning & Zoning Department City. Hall, 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida 33143 Telephone: (305) 663 76326; Fax: (305) 666 -4591 Application for Public Hearing Before Planning Board & City Commission Address of Subject Property:5757SW 68 STREET Lot(s) Block - Subdivision PB SEE ATTACHED SURVEY Meets & Bounds: Applicant: Phone: CODINA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Representative: Organization: JERRY. B. PROCTOR, ESQ.. , ►l r:� Address. Phone: "� ' ` 2" L2 200 SO. BISCAYNE BLVD., SUITE 2500 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 Property Owner: Signature: _ COMMERCE LANE ENTERPRISES, INC, Mailing Address: Phone: 5757 68 STREET � MIAMI, , FLORIDA F 33143 ° /4/e�,17 C Architect/Engineer. Phone:-305- 666 - 5474 ARTS GARCIA The undersigned has read this completed application and represents that the information and all submitted materials are true and correct to the best of the applicant's knowledge and belief. • �oG%U�� DC�r- C- ��Yh-ea -�` Cp+r�l�Gt -hG.'h . : 6q, ti,rWA6_ App_.cants gignature and title _..... _ Date •._ Upon receipt, applications -and all submitted materials will be reviewed for. compliance with the Land Development Code •and offier applicable registrations. Applications found not in compliance will be rejected and returned to the applicant. OFFICE USE ONLY; Date F66d Date of PB Hearing Date of Commission Petition Required Petition Accepted Method of Payment \73190\13707\#685596v l 7/16/04 3:48 PM AS THE APPLICANT, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO THIS PROJECT: Owner. Owners Representative X - Contract to purchase .Option to purchase Tenanftessee APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE FOR THE FOLLOWING:. .SUBMITTED MATERIALS PLEASE CHECK THE APPROPRIATE ITEM: - PLEASE CHECK ALL THAT APPLY: Text Amendment to LDC _ Variance X° Zoning Map Amendmen#. ®.Special Use ... ... X . PUD Approval Special Exception PUD Major Change Other ® X Letter of intent' Justifications for change: Statement of hardship Proof of ownership or letter from owner _ Power of attorney Briefly explain a lication and cite s ecific Code sections: SEE ATTACHED LETTER OF INTENT _ Contract to purchase e J� Current survey (1 original-sealed and signed/1 reduced copy @ 11" x'17 ") 7 copies of Site Plan and Floor Plans reduced copy @ 11 "x 17" 20% Property owner signatures Section: Subsection: Page #. Amended Date: X Mailing labels (3 sets) and map i Required Fee(s) The undersigned has read this completed application and represents that the information and all submitted materials are true and correct to the best of the applicant's knowledge and belief. • �oG%U�� DC�r- C- ��Yh-ea -�` Cp+r�l�Gt -hG.'h . : 6q, ti,rWA6_ App_.cants gignature and title _..... _ Date •._ Upon receipt, applications -and all submitted materials will be reviewed for. compliance with the Land Development Code •and offier applicable registrations. Applications found not in compliance will be rejected and returned to the applicant. OFFICE USE ONLY; Date F66d Date of PB Hearing Date of Commission Petition Required Petition Accepted Method of Payment \73190\13707\#685596v l 7/16/04 3:48 PM City of South Miami Application No. PB -04 -015 Zone Map Change D D ° 6600 p � 5963 u� 5977. 6601 TODD (MU -4) to PUD -M Planned Unit Development- Mixed Use O N to O to O 6600 -6640 SW 57th-Avenue 5950 6647 rn ° 2 6351 0 rn ti m o co L-?4,T 6350 M rn 6340 F6345 6340 6669 6325, Ln w 0 M CO co �6!64 6373 ,°�' 6412 593564156411 SW 1� pp�►� C 64TN ST. ■ ■■■MI�+iRG&FE■DR ■■=_••• ■ ■o ■■ ■ ■ ■■ 5978 0 0 p 5944 D 6401 6401 6400 6401 6400 6401 6400 6401 6400 ■ 6415 6412 0 t c 6411 6410 6411 6410 6411 6410 6411 6410 ■ 6429 0 6428 6443 6421 ■ 6443 6442 0 6442 6445 ¢ 6421 6420 J 6421 6420 6421 6420 ,6420 V 6457 o r2D 6456 6461 6431 6430 6431 6430 6431 6430 6430 0 ,6450 6420 _ f— 6441 6440 6449 6440' 6441 6440 6441 6440 • 6487 o 6481 CF) Ln 6501 6500 6501 6500 . 6501 6500 65D1 6500 6501 0 r. 8505' 6500 6501 6511 6510 6510 6511 6'`10' 6511 6510 • 6519 D 6516 ® '6521 6511 0 6532 0 � m U� 6520 6521 6520 6521 6520 6521 0 6533 Se `SO 6551 �. 0 '6531 6530 6531 6530 6531 6530 6531 ;52 0 5987 6540 ski D 0 co 5875 6540 5843 6540 6541 6540 6541 0 ■ c 974 SW 66TH ST ■ D D ° 6600 p � 5963 u� 5977. 6601 CD N O N to O to O O m 5950 6647 rn ° 2 h 0 co m° 0 w m co w m M 6669 Ln w M M CO co 0 0 biui ■ Cb ■ in ■ ■ sys� 5949 , ■ U2 ti ■ o m C � m r ■ LO ra 0 5$�$ 57g8 M 580 S�tZ CO �� 0 co m emn s> h� 5150 s o sy� s a> � ■ 10 Lf) `fib s� 5810 s C ■ 588 LTO A O ■ 5°�� 6900 g8S 5842 p se r 5650.. ��s 5621 0 f [ m W Ti 1. ST Lo w LLJ 5630 ■ ■ S r m ■ o ■ 5950 rn rn ° m Om to ° co CD 5907 to 6845 ra 0 5$�$ 57g8 M 580 S�tZ CO �� 0 co m emn s> h� 5150 s o sy� s a> � ■ 10 Lf) `fib s� 5810 s C ■ 588 LTO A O ■ 5°�� 6900 g8S 5842 p se r 5650.. ��s 5621 0 f [ m W Ti 1. ST Lo w LLJ 5630 ■ ■ S r m ■ o ■ BfLZIN SUMBERG BAENA PRICE & AXELROD LLP A PARTNERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS 200 SOUTH BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, SUITE 2500 -. MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131-S340 TELEPHONE: (305) 374 -7580 - FAX: (305) 374 -7593 E- MAIL:, INFOOSILZIN.COM - WWW.BILZIN.COM JERRY B. PROCTOR, ESQ. DIRECT DIAL: (305) 350 -235 1 EMAIL: JPROCTOR @BILZIN.COM' July-28, 2004 Hand Delivery Mr. Don O'Donniley,.AICP, Planning Director City of South Miami 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, Florida 33143 Re: ' .Zoning Application by Codina Development Corporation. Address: 6600 -6640 S.W. 57 Avenue (Red Road) and°5757 S:W 6S Street Dear Mr, O'Donnlley: Please- accept the attached .application for rezoning and plan approval of . a Planned Unit Development (Mixed -Use) Development on the above - styled - Property. The undersigned . represents Codina Development Corporation ("Codina"),, prospective developer of approximately 7 acres of land located at the southy est corner of SW 66 Street and SW 57 Avenue (Red Road). Codina hereby requests a district boundary change from TODD (MU -4) to Planned Unit, Development. Mixed -Use (PUD =M), and concurrent site plan approval for development of the Property. Enclosed herewith please find the requisite application fee Ci ty of_ South Miami application forms proof of ownership of :properti es=, surveys of the property, public notice zna�i ingaabels and afHow it; ppoper-iy = - --- 7.- - owner notification affidavit, common area report, and copies of the - proposed plans for the mixed -use development on the Property. 1732601215311 # 687239 v 1 70104 2:18 PM BILZIN SUMBERG BAENA PRICE & AXELROD LLP Mr. Don O'Donniley, AICP July 28, 2004 Page 2 Pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan. and Section 20- 3.7(e) (Planned Unit Developments -PUD -M Mixed - Use) ;please note the following: 1. The property is designated for Transit - Oriented Development District (TODD) (Flexible Height up to 8 stories) in the City's Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan provides as follows: Transit - Oriented Development District (TODD) (Flexible Heightup to 8 stories). The Transit- Oriented Development District is intended to provide for the development of office uses, office services, office- related retail, retail, retail services, and residential uses in multi -story and mixed -use projects that are characteristic of transit- oriented developments: Permitted heights and intensities shall be set forth in the Land Development Code, including design standards. Zoning regulations shall encourage development within_ the TODD in conjunction with. limiting new development within. the Special Flood Hazard Area. The City shall pursue an incentives program for redevelopment including flexible building heights and designs standards- to insure that responsible, effective and aesthetically pleasing projects result. The proposed development, as depicted on the attached plans prepared by Wolfberg Alvarez & Associates, provides retail and resideriti.al uses (for rental) and a mixed -use design that complies. with the spirit and letter of the Comprehensive Plan designation for the property. 2. The PUD -M Zoning District encourages complementary combinations of uses including multi- family residential and commercial uses, within 1,200. feet from any ___ M. etr_ oiaiLStation_ Lhave_ enclos .e...d_amaenal_photograph..from Miarru_Dade_:CountX __._:..:_ -�_:e which indicates an approximate distance of 1,092' feet between the property and the South Miami Station of Miami -Dade County's Metrorail"Corridor. BILZIN SUMBERG BAENA PRICE & AXELROD LLP Mr. Don O'Donniley, AICP July 28, 2004 Page 3 3. The PUD -M District permits multi- family residential dwellings, accessory parking lots and structures, and retail stores: 4. ' The property exceeds the minimum site area for a PUD -M development of 4 acres. 5. The proposed site plan features considerable pedestrian .access and a reduced intensity of developmont along SW 66 Street, adjacent to the residential community to the north. The proposed intensity of development is compatible with the surrounding. area., which includes the large FPL - transmission facility to the -west, retail sand industrial zoning and development to the south and southwest, and the higher- intensity apartment and Metrorail facilities in the area. Thank you for your consideration of this application. Very truly yours, , Jerry B. Proctor JBP ad Encl. c: Maria Davis, City Manager dS.l I co ' i �I i 0 I •P_ s �A - IIVu Qmoo � D N 5m a`✓_'H 7C rL C q 2 O [sN� VOi O � yya C7 �Cf n n O O v? i7 o R a ; og .. , T � _il!�I� i SCI �II�'� � � � � • U,N b A w -;a D 0 y °z � x o � w m v e �• � � m Z _ v f� r� wAw � aJ a •� � c � ® g � ,� F. � W A C �. O N O rA m e mw 0 r nW I 1 I1'�► — � %ill° � l�O �9� c �� R,�B L ` •9 N ma...pW 1. alila��ll I A,V f1 W m NNNNN{TNN `mil m . a m m 1 m D r FAIR III 9 ®o■ w \IIhII iVII��IIVI _ BUILDING D 4 STORIES Ali Sf� ° I I % i�e? i4• ��' CiLl�i��w >!��>��:�i11L.� -'*,' � fly � o •P_ s �A Qmoo � D N 5m a`✓_'H 7C rL C q 2 O [sN� VOi O � yya C7 �Cf n n O O v? i7 o R a ; og 9 T m w U,N b A w -;a D 0 y °z � x o � w m v e �• � � m Z _ v f� r� wAw � aJ a •� � c � ® g � ,� F. � W A C �. O N O rA m e mw 0 r nW l�O b� •9 N ma...pW AWAW A,V f1 W m NNNNN{TNN NN m m 1 m D r O •P_ s �A � tGqG�m b o m w ro ro -a G r +e On < � F O O O O AJ H H N 5m a`✓_'H 7C rL C q 2 O [sN� VOi O � yya C7 �Cf n n O O v? i7 o aN a ; og v e �• � � _ v f� r� wAw � aJ a •� � c � ® g � ,� F. � W A C �. O N O rA nW l�O b� n m� n n E �° O� °�' • w d S A. ep — ..° 3 ZONING REGULATIONS 20 -3.7 (E) Mixed Use (PUDW. (1) General Requirements. (a) A PUD -M district may be established for complementary and compatible combi- nations of commercial, office, hotel or motel, multi- family residential and similar uses directly located and related to the MetroRail station, (b) Such planned unit developments shall be subject to the general procedures, stan- dards -and requirements of this Code applicable to all planned unit development, as well as the requirements of this section: (c) The closest major entrance to any proposed PUD -M development shall be not less than twelve hundred (1,200) feet from the MetioRail station, as measured along the shortest route to accommodate largest number of pedestrians. (2) Uses and Structures. (a) Principal and accessory uses and structures may be permitted in PUD -M devel- opments, subject to the limitations and requirements herein. (b) Specific uses* and structures in a PUD -M district shall be as follows: i. Multi- family residential dwellings; ii. Hotels and motels; iii. Child care centers; iv. Houses of worship; V. Vocational schools, business colleges and similar uses; vi: Private clubs and lodges; vii. Profe.ssional_and_business offaees9 _rner],cal anti rental rlinicg aura of iCes a� ^.d . travel agencies; viii:. Banks and savings associations; ix. Retail stores, except those dealing in used merchandise other than antiques; x. Business and personal service and repair establishments; xi. Eating and drinking places; xii. Cultural or recreational facilities; xiii. Parking lots and structures, subject to controls to insure parking integrity of the development; xiv. Uses other than those listed above, required for the performance of govern - ment, except uses involving storage as the primary purpose; and xv. Structures and uses relating to the operation of public utilities and required to serve the development and neighboring areas; transit or related facilities other than yards, storage, switching or repair shops. 13) T14'ffininiufri site area fora PUD -M development °(4} net "acres. - (4) MetroRail Station Access. ia) MetroRail station accessways may be required at second or third floor levels within the development where necessary to avoid pedestrian/vehicular conflicts. C-M 20 -3.7 SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (b) Consideration shall be given in designing such accessways for their possible use by buildings and activities in the general area, but not a part of the planned unit development. (5) Approval of a PUD -M district shall not be given until arrangement for providing off- street parking and loading in specific amounts and locations are agreed upon by the city and the applicant. (6) Uses in PUD -M developments shall be so arranged horizontally and vertically that; .(a) Retail and service uses shall be concentrated for maximum pedestrian conve- nience and be located for. easy accessibility by visitors and employees working in the development; (b) Residential access shall be separated from other access to the development; (c) Office uses shall be located so as to prevent interruption from' all other uses; and (d) Loading zones shall be located so as to prevent' interference with pedestrian movements. (F) Hospital District (PUD -H). (1) General Requirements. A PUD -H district may be. established for complementary and compatible combinations of hospitals, medical offices, laboratories and related edu- cational facilities and other support services. Such development shall be subject to the -general procedures and requirements of this Code applicable to all planned unit- developments, as well as the requirements of this Section. (2) Uses and Structures. (ay.. .. r . _. :..I and accessory-uses- ' and structures may_ba m peritted in PUD -H Bevel - . opments, subject to the limittions and requirements herein. (b) Specific uses and structures in a PUD -H shall be the following hospital and accessory uses: i. Intermediate care facility; ii. Extended care facility; iii. Medical clinic; iv. Medical offices; v.. Laboratory and research facility; vi. Medical educational facilities; vii. Hospital support facilities including a laundry, cafeteria, dietary services, child care, staff and offices and data processing; viii. Convenience facilities for hospital staff, patients and visitors, including chapels, snack bars, gift shops and florists; and ix. � Any other'uses determinedas part -of the PUD -H appUditidh, to be- compat ible with the existing and/or prospective character of the proposed develop= ment and surrounding area (ci Accessory uses, such as convenience facilities, which may provide services to members of the public not associated with the hospital and/or to members of the 68 OTHER REGULATIONS 20-4.1 ARTICLE IV. OTHER REGULATIONS 20-4.1 Adequate public facilities and services. (A) Purpose. A development permit, Certoficate of Completion (CC), Certificate of °Occu- pancy.(CO), or Certificate. of Use and Occupancy (CU) shall not be issued when level(s) of service (LOS) for public services and facilities do not meet or exceed LOS Standards, or when the issuance of a development permit and/or CC and/or CO and/or CU would result in a reduction of the actual LOS for any service or facility below the established LOS Standards, as specified below. (B) Applicability and Application. (1) New Development on Vacant. Land. For new construction projects, concurrency deter- minations shall be made in conjunction with the earliest development approval which involves a site plan for development. (2) Building Additions and New Development on Occupied Parcels. Any addition which increases gross floor area by 5,000 square feet or more and increases public facility usage shall be subject to concurrency review prior to granting of the CC or CU. Only incremental increase in facility capacity usage over existing usage will be assessed for concurrency. (3) Changes of Use on Occupied Parcels. Changes of use which increase required parking by 25 spaces shall be subject to concurrency review prior to- granting a CU. Only incremental increase in facility capacity usage over existing usage will be °assessed for concurrency. (4) Exempt Projects. The following kinds of development and redevelopment shall not require a concurrency review per, this subsection... (a) Change'of Use to Another Similar Use: Any change of use which clearly causes no increase in demand upon any public facility, or causes a reduction in demand on all public facilities, and does not increase the number of required parking spaces in "excess of 25 parking spaces; (b) Residences: Single- family and two-family dwellings on previously platted lots or as part of waivers -of -plat; (c) Public Uses: Development such as a public or government facility which the City Commission finds essential to the health or safety of City residents; and (d) Existing Approvals: Projects considered as vested or committed and/or site plans approved before adoption of the Land Development Code on October 26, 1989.. (C) LOS Standards. (1) Streets. (a) South Dixie Highway (U.S. 1): Until December 31, 1995, the peak hour LOS standard shall be 115 percent of the peak traffic count in 1989. After December 31, 1995, the peak hour LOS standard shall be 150 percent of 'D" capacity, as defined in the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Supp. No. 2 ° 71 20 -4.1 SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (b) Bird Road (S.W.. 40th Street): The peak hour LOS standard shall be 120 percent of "E" capacity. (c) Principal and Minor Arterials (SunsetDiive, Red Road, Kendall Drive): The peak 1.., - T nO .+L.. -..7 �. -.] 1- _77 L_ ItrI , � ,- r � � �,.v.,. J.rvu a�0JAU=U bUaet ue r capacity, as defined in the adopted Comprehen- sine Plan. (d) Collectors (SA 48 Street, Miller Drive, S.W.' 62nd Avenue, and Ludlam Road): The peak hour LOS standard shall be "E" capacity, except that County collector roadways in the adopted Urban Infill Area are exempt from concurrency review requirements. (e) DRI Exception: The City will not issue any permit which would have the effect of lowering'the LOS below the levels specified above, unless such permits are issued pursuant to a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) approval granted prior to adoption . of the 1989 South Miami Comprehensive Plan on January 18, 1989. (f) RID Exception: The City will not issue any permit which would have the effect of lowering the LOS below the levels specified above, unless such permits are issued for development and/or redevelopment within an approved Redevelopment and Infill District (RID). (g) De Minim.is Impact Exception: The City will not issue any permit which would have the effect of lowering the LOS below the levels specified above, unless such permits are issued for development .and/or redevelopment which meets the conditions in Chapter 163.3180(6), Florida Statutes, and/or in Rule 9J- 5°0055, Florida Administrative Code. (2) Sewage. (a) The disposal systems shall operate with a design capacity of no less than 2 percent above average daily flow for the preceding year, or as determined to be sufficient by Metro-Dade County. (b) The County system maintains capacity to collect and dispose of 100 gallons of sewage per capita per day. (c) For the unsewered properties, LOS shall be the issuance of a Metro-Dade health. Department septic tank permit. e (3) Water. (a) fine. water system shall operate with a rated capacity of no less than 2 percent above the maximum daily flow for the preceding year, or as determined to be sufficient by Metro -Dade County. (b) Water is delivered to users;at apressure no less than 20 pounds_per square inch (psi) and no greater than 100 psi. Minimum fire flows shall be maintained as approved by the Metro -Dade Fire Department. (c) The County system maintains capacity to deliver up to 200 gallons per capita per day. Supp. No. 2 72 OTHER REGULATIONS 20-4.1 (4) Drainage. Any development shall adequately accommodate runoff from the 1 -day, 1 -in -10 -year frequency storm. (5) Solid Waste. The County solid waste disposal system shall maintain a minim„m capacity of five years, or capacity as determined by Metro -Dade County to be sufficient. A generation rate of 7 pounds per person per day may be used for calculation. (6) Recreation. The public (City and School Board) park land within the City shall equal at least 4 acres per 1,000 population. This shall include the School Board recreational land. (D) Concurrency Review Procedures. (1) responsibility. The Building and Planning Department is responsible for concurrency as part of the development permit process. (2) Measurement of LOS. Measurement and evaluation of LOS shall follow these regula- tions, as necessary for approval. The capacity and availability of services shall be determined by the following approach, which is based upon 9J- 5.0055, Florida Administrative Code: (a) Adding together: i. Total design capacity of existing facilities operating at the required LOS; ii. Total design capacity of new facilities that will become available concurrent with the impact of the development andlor change of use; iii. Total design capacity of new facilities under construction at the time of CO approval; iv. For recreational facilities; total design capacity of new facilities that are the subject of a binding, executed contract for construction of facilities to be completed_within_one year-of-the ime the .CO :i cy s4eu; V. For roadway facilities, total design capacity of new facilities that are the subject of a binding, executed contract for construction of facilities to be completed within three years of the time the CO is issued; vi.. For roadway facilities, total design capacity for new facilities that have been included in a financially feasible five -year capital improvement program and construction is scheduled for the third year or earlier; vii. Total design capacity for new facilities that are guaranteed at a specific time in an enforceable development agreement, which may include, but is not limited to, development agreements pursuant to Section 163.3220, Florida Statutes, and development orders pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Stat- utes, with constriction to' begin within three years of GO issuance for roadway facilities and within one year of CO issuance for recreational facilities; and exception (.ncliidEg full. ' exemptions, such as RID concurrency approvals), where the City Commission has granted such an exception, based upon those terms specified in Chapter 163, Florida Stat- utes, and related Florida Administrative Code rules. Supp. No. 2 73 20 -4.1 SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (b) Subtracting from that number the sum of- i. The demand for the service created by existing development, as evidenced by current use; and ii. The demand for the service (by phase or otherwise) -that will be created by the anticipated completion of all currently approved developments, includ- ing the subject development- under evaluation. (3) Determination of Concurrency. (a) County Concurrency Requirements: Metro -Dade County approval is required via the permit process for all County impact fees which currently include roadway, fire, water, sewer, and public schools, as amended. (b) For Water and Sewage: Concurrency shall be evidenced by the approval .of appropriate County and Florida State agencies for water, sewage, and/or septic tanks. (c) For Solid Waste: Concurrency shall be evidenced by the renewal of contracting with Dade County Public Works. (d) For Drainage: Concurrency shall be. evidenced by compliance with South Florida Building Code standards. (e) For Recreation: Concurrency shall be evidenced by evaluation of population and the park land inventory. (f) For Traffic Concurrency shall be evidenced by annual evaluation of roadway capacity and available LOS. (4) Calculation by Either City or Applicant. Calculations may be performed either by the applicant or City; the City shall verify all applicant calculations. (5) Concurrency Review Fee.. An applicant may be charged a concurrency review deposit. This will be used to defray the cost of the determination of concurrency including any consulting fees; the deposit amount shall be defined in the City's Fee Schedule. (E) Concurrency Rights Reservation and Effective Period. (1) Capacity Reservation. Permits 'shall be chronologically logged upon approval to determine reserved capacity (2) Reservation Period. Capacity is considered as reserved until issuance of a CC and/or CO and/or CU for a project. Projects must be completed to preserve any concurrency reservation. Otherwise, whenever development permits issued for projects expire, then concurrency approvals expire with the permits. (3) Extensions. An extension of six months may be granted .by the City Manager (or a designee) if the applicant presents in writing the circumstances for an extension. Applicants may appeal the City Manager's decision to the City Commission. (4) . DevelbpmentAgre67ients: Development agreements, as described in Chi` pter 163.3220, "Florida Local Government Development Agreement Act" [Florida Statutes], shall have a valid concurrency period not to exceed five (5) years or as extended by mutual consent of the City Commission and the applicant. (Ord. No. 7 -96 -1607, § 1, 5 -7 -96) Supp. No. 2 74 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING BOARD Regular Meeting I Action Summary Minutes Monday, September 27, 2004 City Commission Chambers 7:30 P.M. EXCERPT I. Call to Order and the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag Action: The meeting was called to order at 7:38 P.M. Action: The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison. II. Roll Call Action: Mr. Morton, Chairperson, requested a roll call. Board members present constituting a quorum: Mr. Morton, Ms. Gibson, Ms. Yates, Mr. Liddy, Mr. Comendeiro, Mr. Illas, and Mr. Mann. Board members absent: None City staff present: Don O'Donniley (Planning Director), Sanford A. Youkilis (Planning Consultant), Brian Edney (Video Support), and Patricia E. Lauderman (Planning Board Secretary), III. Planning Board Applications / Public Hearings Chairman Mr. Morton swore in speakers PB -04 -015 (A) Applicant: Codina Development Corp. Location : 6600 -6640 SW 57`h Avenue and 5757 SW 68th Street AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO A REQUEST TO Planning Board Meeting September 27, 2004 AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY CHANGING THE ZONING USE DISTRICT FROM "TODD(MU -4) ", TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (MIXED USE -4) TO "PUD -M" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MIXED USE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6600 -6640 SW 57 AVENUE AND 5757 SW 68 STREET; THE PURPOSE OF THE ZONE CHANGE IS TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A MIXED USE PROJECT CONSISTING OF MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, RETAIL USES AND A PARKING GARAGE; SETTING FORTH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RELATED TO THE DETERMINATION OF CONCURRENCY; PROVIDING FOR. SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ACTION: Mr. Mann read the item into record'; Mr. O'Donniley presented the staff report. Mr. O'Donniley stated that the applicant is requesting a rezoning of a seven acre property as legally described above in order to construct a mixed use project including residential buildings, parking and retail uses with 409 dwelling units and 12,476 square feet of commercial space. According to the information submitted with the application, the dwelling unit density will be 58.4 units per acre. The floor area ratio for the total proposed project is listed as 1.54. The complex is be called "Red Road Commons ". He explained the current zoning on the subject property is "TODD(MU -4)" Transit Oriented Development District (Mixed -Use 4) Use District. The applicant is requesting a zone change for the property to PUD -M, Planned Unit Development - Mixed Use. The current TODD(MU -4) Zoning District permits residential and commercial uses, permits two stories in height and does not limit development with a maximum floor area ratio or units per acre formula. Mr. O'Donniley informed the Board that the Planned Unit Development (PUD) submission is to be considered in two parts. The first is a zone map change ordinance, which creates the PUD -M on the City's official map. Issues such as density, compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, traffic, parking requirements, height of buildings, and concurrency are dealt with as part of the zone map change. The second part is the applicant's request for approval by resolution of the PUD master site plan. Specific issues related to building design, landscaping, and other site plan features are dealt with in a companion item. In addition, Mr. O'Donniley provided the following development analysis of the project: 1. The LDC requires that an application for a PUD -M shall be for a project which is on a site of at least 4 acres. The subject application is on a seven acre site. In addition the development site must be within 1200 feet of the Metro Rail station. The applicant states that the project site is 1092 feet from the Metro Rail station. Planning Board Meeting September 27, 2004 2. The PUD -M allows a limited number of uses which are listed in Section 20 -3.7 (E) of the LDC. It includes retail establishments and multi - family residential uses being proposed by the developer, 3; The Red Road Commons project is an excellent opportunity for the City to encourage affordable housing to be built. The developer should be required to commit at least 5 % of the units as affordable housing units. 4. In order to meet concurrency for recreational facilities the developer must specify in a development agreement that within five years he will pay for or produce 3.7 acres of land for public park or recreational purposes. Mr. O'Donniley then reviewed a formula that can be used to determine the concurrency costs. 5. The proposed rezoning is consistent with and supports the goals and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan. ( See No. 1, Development Analysis above). 6. A residential development at this location would take full advantage of being adjacent to the transit station and within walking distance of shops, post office, hospitals, restaurants and other amenities of the downtown area. The use would also provide a transition between lower density residential to the north and commercial development to the south. 7. The property is located in the Community Redevelopment Area. The rezoning is consistent with the goals and objectives of the CRA and the "Hometown Plan Area 2 Report", which calls for mixed use development on this site. (p.33) 8. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the recommendations of the Zoning Task Force for this site. In 2002 the Task Force's subcommittee on TODD carried out considerable study on the district. 9. The traffic pattern from a residential development is generally more dispersed through out the day and night and has less impact on peak traffic. Traffic analysis of the current commercial development as compared with the traffic that will be generated by the proposed residential development, indicates that the proposed land use change may actually reduce peak hour vehicle trips generated by this property. However, certain traffic operations and management adjustments will be addressed in the review of the resolution approving the master site plan. The Chairman then called upon the applicant to make apresentation. (Applicant's representative) Mr. Jerry Proctor, Esq Mr. Aris Garcia (Architect) Mr. Marcel Morlote Mr. Tim Plummer Mr. Jeremy Shapiro Planning Board Meeting September 27, 2004 Mr. Proctor began his presentation on the request for rezoning and plan approval of a Planned Unit Development (Mixed -Use) Development for the address 6600- 6640 S.W. 57 Avenue (Red Road and 5757 S.W. 68 Street. He added that Codina Development Corporation ( "Codina" ), the prospective developer requests a district boundary change from TODD (MU -4) to Planned Unit Development Mixed -Use (PUD -M), and concurrent site plan approval for development of the property. Furthermore, he stated that the PUD -M Zoning District encourages complementary combinations of uses, including multi- family residential and commercial uses, within 1,200 feet from any Metro -rail Station. He also indicated that the proposed site plan features considerable pedestrian access and a reduced intensity of development along SW 66 Street, adjacent to the residential community to the north. The proposed intensity of development is compatible with the surrounding area, which included the large FPL transmission facility to the west, retail and industrial zoning and development to the south and southwest, and the higher- intensity apartment and ;Metro -rail facilities in the area. Mr. Aris Garcia the architect for "Red Road Commons," explained to the Board in- depth the project's PUD submittal. He presented the site plan and zoning analysis, numerous comprehensive floor plans, elevations and survey. Mr. Morton then opened the Public Hearing. Speakers: NAME ADDRESS SUPPORT /OPPOSE David Tucker 6556 SW 78' Ter. Supported Mr. Tucker believed that this project can be beneficial to the community and that the City will make this project work. Jay Beckman 6520 SW 65 St. - Mr. Beckman stated his concern for the protection of green space in South Miami. Rev. Gregory Gay, Sr. 6461 SW 59th Place Supported Mr. Gay, Sr. agreed with the project and was looking forward to having it in the community. Ed. O'Reilly 6640 SW 48 St. Opposed Mr. O'Reilly opposed the application and did not support this project because of the potential influx of traffic. Larry Kelly - Supported Mr. Kelly supported the application and believed that the project would benefit a lot of people in terms of work for the residents in the area. Yvonne Beckman 5871 SW 83rd St, Opposed Ms. Beckman did not agree with the building heights of the proposed project. Planning Board Meeting September 27, 2004 Beth Schwartz 6931 SW 62nd Ct. Opposed Ms. Schwartz urged the Board to consider the traffic build -up that may be caused by this project and did not agree with the building heights for the project. Mr. Morton closed the Public Hearing. Motion: Mr. Comendeiro made a motion to recommend approval of the rezoning request, subject to the following four staff conditions: (1) The applicant shall execute a development agreement which must include the conditions set forth below and in the staff report pertaining to the requested zone map change and shall incorporate all conditions which may be adopted as part of the approval of the project's PUD master site plan (the PUD Master Site Plan is a separate item to be adopted by resolution) (2) The applicant shall include in the development agreement: (a) an agreement that within five years the developer will pay for or produce 3.7 acres of land for public park or recreational purposes. (see attached recreational concurrency formula); (b) an agreement that 5% of the multi - family units constructed shall be classified and marketed as affordable housing units. (3) The applicant shall provide evidence of concurrency compliance by submitting to the city the appropriate documents needed to prove concurrency with water, sewerage, schools, and solid waste. (4) The applicant shall provide to the city a unity of title document for the subject development site; the unity of title shall be prepared and filed in accordance with Section 20 -5.16 of the South Miami Land Development Code. Ms. Yates seconded the motion. Voter Ayes 6 Nays 1 (Mr. Illas ) MIAMI DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays Miami, Miami -Dade County, Florida STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADE: Before the undersigned authority personally appeared O.V. FERBEYRE, who on oath says that he or she is the SUPERVISOR, Legal Notices of the Miami Daily Business Review f /k/a Miami Review, -a daily (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami in Miami -Dade County, Florida; that the attached:opy of advertisement, being a Legal Advertisement of Notice in the matter of CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI PUBLIC HEARINGS - FEBRUARY 23, 2005 in the XXXX Court, was published in said newspaper in the issues of 02/04/2005 Affiant further says that the said Miami Daily Business Review is a newspaper published at Miami in said Miami -Dade County, Florida and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Miami -Dade County, Florida, each day (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Miami in said Miami -Dade County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he or she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securi.np6is adv ' e for publication in the said newgar. Sworn to and subscribed before me this 04 y of BRUARY D. 2005 (SEAL) .� a�� Maria 1. mesa O.V. FERBEYRE personally kno%y ` = L My Commission DD293555 Ex,s March 04, 2008 1� { � SPECIAL NOTE gNa. r t Pursuant to Florida 3tatQ Statutdl63 3221 interested z s persons are advised that m atld�t�on to the mforma { A ton set forth above the proposed protect will tie built w on a seven acre tract of land and will have:a dwelimg �' � ' unit acre densitytofr583 unrts pew'and a floor area`rl raho (FAR) of i4 54 the^ estimated pJopu�at�on density $ ;, ofzthe protecttis;132,persons,peracre fA,copy ofcthej ` r tdevelopment agreement,can be obtained �# $he Soufb � r miami Planmrig Department',at' the address shown) { s Inquwnes+ concerning this item should be^ directed to kthe Planning ALL �nter�ster� parties areirnded to�etkentl and,will be heard ; x a - , ' ar '�" ;y� � GityGlerlc a k!t� �.k�ri a s, f;� tr1 _x�r*w`(i1Ty Of SOUth fl�lamlr &`'t Pursuant fo Florida Statutes 286 Q105 j they City hersliyjaduases the: public' that a� a person decides to appeal any decision,made by this` Board,Agency pr Commission with,respect to any matter considered at, its,meetmg or hearing heror shenuvilh need a record ot,the prbceedmgs and Athat forsuch purpose affected person maykr#eed'to ensure that a, verbatim record of the proceeding's isjmatle which record includes they testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based 214 SPORTS- HAT YOU CAN D4 Listings are considered for publication free of charge on a space - available basis with preference given to nonprofit organizations, benefits and free activities. Notices must be received at least two weeks before.the publication date or your event's registration deadline. Listings must contain a local orC toll -free phone number for the public to contact and any fees. Mail notices to: Calendar Desk - Newsroom, The Herald, I Herald Plaza, Miartti, FL 33132 -1693 or e-mail to: newscalendar @heraid.com (with name and date of event on subject line). For questions, call 305- 376 -3355 from 10 a.m. to 6 "hing - , �y1r��' aq��/ , I I I' . 1 i �Yi4� NRft6Af� 004862 g_. } a Q a w . a _ F -p.m.weekdays. a txm- BASEBALL RUNNING /WALKING Little League Registration: Ages Charity Poker SK Walkathon: u 5-18; through Feb. T2; Miami Springs Benefits Little Brothers-Friends of the a. Recreation Center, 1401 Westward - Elderly; 10:15 a.m. Feb. 12; Miami Ever- o D,jMl0ami5Spnngs3$890 glades, 206865W162ndAve.,Miami; c 3 05.6865 '• $12.305- 969.9299. by the E�� ®� SOUTH BJf 616 A 19 E CITY 4J H iiV'p/�M 3 Miami Muckdogs: Travel team for players 12 and under is looking for experienced pitchers and players to The Fun Run SK: Sponsored Marian Center PTA; 7 :30 a.m. Feb. 5; Marian Center School &Services,' COURTESY NOTICE 3 try out. Call Billy Hein at 15701 NW 37th Ave, Miami Gardens; w 305- 300 - 1367. $25:305- 200 -8927, ext.213. SOCCER NOTICE IS HEREBY given that the City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida will consider "Red FOOTBALL legislation listed below pertaining to a,proposed Planned Unit Development Project entitl6d Road n on n coed Adult soccer Commons" located at 6600 -6640 SW 57 Avenue and 5757 SW 68 Street Coed Four on Four Flag Football Registration: Ages 21 and older Registration: For ages 18 and older; through Feb. 10; Ransom Everglades, through Jan. 25 for recreational divi- sion and Feb. 15 for competitive; Ken- (1) A Discussion Workshop scheduled for Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 7:00 PM; 3735 Main Hwy., Coconut Grove; $65 call Soccer Park, 8011 SW 127th Ave., for fndividuals,3475 for teams. Kendall; $75 for Individuals, $1000for (2) A Public Hearing during a Special City Commission meeting on Wednesday, February 23, 2005 305.666 -1542 or www.tmssc com, teams, 305- 668 -1542 or beginning at 7:00 PM. Nike Speed, Agility and Quickness Camps :.Professionaffootbalttraining www.tmssc.com. • Women 'sSoccer League Reglstra- camp open to all high school football tion : All female sixvs. six Sunday soc- . Both the workshop and the public hearing will be held In'the City Commission Chambers, South Miami players; free. Coaches and players car program; Palmer Park, 6100 SW City Hall, 6130 Sunset Drive. The legislation to be considered is as follows: ' who wish to register, should call Wes- 67th Ave, South Miami; $60 for indl- leyFraterat954 -382- 9832:. vfduais.305- 665.1569 orwww.mfa a 7 -9 pm. Feb. 8, Feb. 15, Feb. 22 and mipremiersoccer.com AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THED1TY OF SOUTH MIAMI LAND March l; Trai Powell Stadium, Miami- DEVELOPMENT CODE BY CHANGING THE ZONING USE DISTRICT FROM "TODO(MU -4)' , TRANSIT Dade Community College, North ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (MIXED 'USE-4) TO "PUD -M" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT- Campus, 11380,NW 27th Ave.; Miami. SOFTBALL MIXED USE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6600 -6640 SW 57 AVENUE AND $757 SW 68 STREET; THE 'Canes and Gatorw Co-ed softball I PURPOSE OF THE ZONE CHANGE IS TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A MIXED USE PROJECT INLiNE SKATING showdown featuring graduates from CONSISTING OF MULTI- FAMILY'RESIDENTIALBUILDINGS, RETAIL USES AND A PARKING' GARAGE; Sobe- RoaersP.oucrEscortedSkate the University of Florida and the Uni- versityofMlami `71a.mFeb.l9;Troph SETTING FORTH CONDITIONS OF"APPROVAL RELATED TO THE DETERMINATION OPGONCURRENCY ' Tour: Skate covers 10=12 miles of cal Park, 7900 SW 40th St„ East Miami Beach with multiple water Mfaml•bade.3o5- 866 -5047, A RESOLUTION APPROVING A MASTER SITE PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR CERTAIN stops; skaters must wear helmets. and Scoreboard Activities., Registering PROPERTY IN A "PUD -M"•.PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICT MORE should bring their own waterafter- wards skaters are invited on a speed aduft men for the upcoming softball . night season; games are played Sun ' SPECIFICALLY LOCATED AT 6600 -6640 SW 57 AVENUE AND 5757 SW 68 STREET SETTING FORTH skate to downtown Miami or to days; Tamiami Park, 11201 SW 24th CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RELATED TO SITE, TRAFFIC, SIGNAGE, AND URBAN DESIGN ISSUES, AND gather with other skaters for dinner; 7 St., West Miami -Dade; $535 per team. CONSTRUCTION OF APPROPRIATE PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND LANDSCAPING, p.m. Feb. 4; Miami Beach Community 786- 443 -0720 ortledo411 @aot.com. Center, 2100 Washington Ave„ Miami Beach; free. 305 866 -2649 or AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A'DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO FLORIDA STATE STATUE www.sober6liers.com. TENNIS 163.3221 FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELDPMENT -MIXED USE PROJECT KNOWN AS RED ROAD ' COMMONS LOCATED AT 6600 -6640 SW 57 AVENUE AND 5757 SW 68 STREET THE DEVELOPMENT Junior UsA Team Tennis: Ages 6 -16. WILL INCLUDE BUILDINGS OF UP TO FIVE (5) STORIES IN HEIGHT AND THE FOLLOWING USES: UP TO MARTIAL ARTS Team tennis competition program offered to boys and girls of aA skill 409 MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS RETAIL USES OFFICE USES. AND A PARKING GARAGE. r r AlkldoClasses,,EVeryoneIswelcome; levels. Sanctioned by the United'. 7 -8.30 p.m Monday, Tuesday, Thurs- States Tennis Associadon:through SPECIAL NOTE: daral'Ga i les; $6S a mooing Ave:, CoralUables; $65 a month. 40th St, East Tropical 40th St, East Miami -Dade; $75, $60- Miami Dade: 75, $ Pursuant to Florida State Statue 163.3221 interested persons are advised that in addition to the . p ' 768.346 -3618 or www.aiklspirit.com. USIA members. dos- 460 -8002. Information. set forth above the proposed project will be built on a seven acre tract of land and Alper Jewish Community Center. Tennis After School Program: will have a dwelling unit density of 58.3 units per acre and a floor- -area -ratio (FAR) of 1.54. The Open to all levels. Focuses on proper Funded by a grant from The Chu- estimated population density *of the project is 132 persons per acre. A copy of the development technique to hit both heavy and speed bags while incorporating calls - dren 's Trust, the programJs for chil- dren 7.17. It requires minimum atteo- agreement can be obtained at the South MiamiPfannin Department 9 p rtment at the address shown above. thenics, lumping rope and agility . dance of three days per week; skills; 4:30.6 p.m. Tuesdays; 6:45 -B 3:'30 -6,30p m. Monday - Fridays, Inquiries Concerning this item should be directed to the Planning Department at 305 -663 -6326. p.m,, 9:3D-midnight Thursdays; 11155 through June 3;Ashe- Buchholz Ten.. SW 1t2th.Ave., Miami; $15 perclass or $150 for t classes. 305.271 -9000, nis Center at Moore Park, 756 NW 36th SL, Miami;.free.305- 637.1061. A ALL Interested parties are invited to attend and Will be heard. ext.284. Maria M: Menendez Martial Arts: Aikido self defense City Clerk classes for adults and teens; 8:30. OTHER SPORTS 9:45 p.m. Monday, Tuesday and Thursday; On Your Toes Gymnastics eXtieme Miami Sports Club: Pursuad to Roddy staddes 2860105, the City hereby advises the putilic that t a person decides to appeal arty decision made by this 8owd,Agemy Center, 2721 SW 137th Ave:, West Two -to -five events per month; rode or Commission with respect to any matter considered at is meeting a leasing, sing, he or she va'0 need a record of the proceedings, and mat for such Miami -Dade. 305- 632 -3075 or troy dema!"lanLrnm climbing, scuba diving, snorkeling, le —loon ... i n i fnne nr mnmhar- purpose,-affected person may need to ensure that a verbatim rerwrd of the proceedings is made which record includes the teslummy end evidence - MIAMI DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays Miami, Miami -Dade County, Florida STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADE: Before the undersigned authority personally appeared O.V. FERBEYRE, who on oath says that he or she is the SUPERVISOR, Legal Notices of the Miami Daily Business Reviewf /k/a Miami Review, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami in Miami -Dade County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being aLLegal Advertisement of Notice in the matter of CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI .PUBIC HEARINGS 3/7/2005 in the XXXX Court, was published in said newspaper in the issues of 02/25/2005 Affiant further says that the said Miami Daily Business Review is a newspaper published at Miami in said Miami -Dade County, Florida and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Miami -Dade County, Florida, each day (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Miami in said Miami -Dade County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy advertisement; and affiant further says that he or she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing s advertis for publication in the said newspap Sworn to and subscribed before me this 25 day of FEBRUARY A.D. 2005 (SEAL) O.V. FERBEYRE personally known to me NEIGHBORHOOD ® ®® Are your vacation plans - - - - -- up f ®r grabs? a CORAL GABLES PARTY GEARS UP Find Travel Solutions in Sundays Herald. FOR TOYOTAINDY300 Part of Alhambra Circle in 1 downtown Coral Gables will be closed to traffic from lI am. today into early Friday"' v to make way for a block party to celebrate the seed for , speeds t This week's Toyota Indy may be in racing enthusiasts tsecandet a a f preview in the City Beautiful today at Toyota Indyfest, an I £��• outdoor kickoff party on the hit¢Sgnsyquex�u�rt7 eve of the races Fridays �?rr I✓� t through Sunday at Home - stead -Miami Speedway. 1 There will be show cars �cnffyCS�� interactive ames,live enter- An e:: arr a �;5�T�tS143 1 tainment and opportunities to z get drivers' autographs from 5 4, to 11 p.m: along the 300 block of Alhambra Circle, from Le Jeune Road to Salzedo Street. For more information, call` the Homestead -Miami Speed- s. Kfst way 305- 230 -5024. „fir: �N��r,�' -�i��r Alhambra Circle should be .rc RrF�s� reopened to vehicular traffic by 2 a.m. Friday but the speed limit will not change. x ry ate. at 0 ¢fL ,a ... ® CORAL GABLES r I I I SUSPECT ARRESTED IN ARMED CARJACKING " v Coral Gables police arrested a 32- year -old man after he _ allegedly pulled a gun on a - — man outside a convenience All are welcome fi6 store Monday. Boring '� According to police, Wit- 1 liam Cooper stuck a gun in Peter Abrams' chest as he was getting out of his car in the parking lot of Circle K, 4900 t Le Jeune Rd., at 6:58 p.m. 1 Abrams, 57, told police that I Cooper demanded his car keys and money, and then µ took off in the car, police said, £_ Ic About 30 minutes later, i ? J, both Coral Gables and city of Miami police officers arrived P at Gardners Market, 3ll7 Bird Rd after receiving a LoJack Sun i, : ;C® alert from the stolen car, j! j Police said Cooper put aj r j' black Smith & Wesson 9mm far k s�Cr6d pistol at his feet before raising d11�fSIy his Latex - gloved hands to sur- Ito¢�#Ird render. Cooper, of 3879 Charles Terr., faces three felony 6Pr�)� counts of armed carjacking, I �li�l�#1�'1g4� el�l�#1P1 i grand theft auto and posses -fxN l sion of a firearm by a con- victed felon. i [hrist The IGng Lutheran Church —11295 SW 57 Avenue, Miami 1 L Free Admission _305.665.5063 Across from Pinecrest Gardens _n i Up to 75 % off On selected merchandise including jewelry, w tabletop, body products, picture frames, candles, ui and much more! The Gilded Hand u 165 Aragon Avenue I Coral Gables d 305.442.1445 tel 1 305.442.1570 fax 2 a, Mon -Fri 10:30 am - 9 pm _ Sat -Sun 10:30 am.- 5:30 pm 3 www.thegildedhand.com 3 (Across from the Colonnade Hotel) w CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI COURTESY NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY given that the City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida will hold a Special City Commission Meeting, on Monday, March 7, 2005 beginning at 7 :30 PM to conduct public hearings to consider legislation on the items listed below pertaining to a proposed Planned Unit Development' Project entitled "Red Road Commons" located at 6600.6640 SW 57 Avenue and 5757 SIN 68 Street. The public hearings will be held in the City Commission Chambers, South Miami City . Hall, 6130 Sunset Drive. (NOTICE IS HEREBY given that the Special City Commission Meeting to consider these public hearings originally scheduled for Wednesday, fe6ruary 23. 2005 at7:00 o.m. has been CANCELLED). AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY CHANGING THE ZONING USE DISTRICT FROM TODD(MU -4) °, TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (MIXED USE -4) TO "PUD -M° PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTMIXED.USE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6606 -6640 SW 57 AVENUE AND 5757 SW 68 STREET; THE PURPOSE OF THE ZONE CHANGE IS TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A MIXED USE PROJECT CONSISTING OF MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS RETAIL USES AND A PARKING GARAGE SETTING FORTH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RELATED TO THE DETERMINATION OF CONCURRENCY k RESOLUTION APPROVING A MASTER SITE PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY IN A °PUD -M" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MIMED USE ZONING DISTRICT MORE SPECIFICALLY LOCATED AT 6600 -6640 SW 57 AVENUE AND 5757 SW 68 STREET; SETTING FORTH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RELATED TO SITE, . TRAFFIC, SIGNAGE, AND URBAN DESIGN ISSUES, AND CONSTRUCTION OF APPROPRIATE PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND LANDSCAPING. AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO FLORIDA STATE STATUE 163.3221 `FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT -MIXED USE PROJECT KNOWN AS RED ROAD COMMONS .LOCATED AT 6600 -6640 SW 57 AVENUE AND 5757 SW 68 STREET; THE DEVELOPMENT WILL INCLUDE BUILDINGS OF UP TO FIVE (5) STORIES IN HEIGHT AND THE FOLLOWING USES: UP TO 409 MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS, RETAIL USES, OFFICE USES AND A PARKING GARAGE SPECIAL NOTE Pursuant to Florida State Statue 163 3221 interested persons are advised that in addition to the information set forth above the proposed project.. will be built on a seven acre tract of land and will have a dwelling unit density of. 58.3 units per acre and a floor- area -ratio (FAR) of 1.54. The estimated population density of the project is 132 persons per acre. A copy of the development agreement can be obtained at the South Miami Planning. Department at the address shown above. Inquiries concerning this item should be directed to the Planning Department at 305-663-6326. ALL interested parties are invited to attend and will be heard.. Made M. Menendez City Clerk Pursuant to Florida Statutes 286.0105, the City hereby advises the public that If a person / decides to appeal any decision made by this Board, Agency or commission with respect to any matter considered at Its meeting or hearing, he or she will need a record of the proceedings, and that for such purpose, affected person may need to ensure that a varba6m record of the proceedings is made which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. A 7 p� o O S 001'AL C'AB L as Q BON IE'S CLEAN SWEET' SALE y Beginning Friday, March 4th Up to 75 % off On selected merchandise including jewelry, w tabletop, body products, picture frames, candles, ui and much more! The Gilded Hand u 165 Aragon Avenue I Coral Gables d 305.442.1445 tel 1 305.442.1570 fax 2 a, Mon -Fri 10:30 am - 9 pm _ Sat -Sun 10:30 am.- 5:30 pm 3 www.thegildedhand.com 3 (Across from the Colonnade Hotel) w CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI COURTESY NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY given that the City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida will hold a Special City Commission Meeting, on Monday, March 7, 2005 beginning at 7 :30 PM to conduct public hearings to consider legislation on the items listed below pertaining to a proposed Planned Unit Development' Project entitled "Red Road Commons" located at 6600.6640 SW 57 Avenue and 5757 SIN 68 Street. The public hearings will be held in the City Commission Chambers, South Miami City . Hall, 6130 Sunset Drive. (NOTICE IS HEREBY given that the Special City Commission Meeting to consider these public hearings originally scheduled for Wednesday, fe6ruary 23. 2005 at7:00 o.m. has been CANCELLED). AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY CHANGING THE ZONING USE DISTRICT FROM TODD(MU -4) °, TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (MIXED USE -4) TO "PUD -M° PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTMIXED.USE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6606 -6640 SW 57 AVENUE AND 5757 SW 68 STREET; THE PURPOSE OF THE ZONE CHANGE IS TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A MIXED USE PROJECT CONSISTING OF MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS RETAIL USES AND A PARKING GARAGE SETTING FORTH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RELATED TO THE DETERMINATION OF CONCURRENCY k RESOLUTION APPROVING A MASTER SITE PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY IN A °PUD -M" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MIMED USE ZONING DISTRICT MORE SPECIFICALLY LOCATED AT 6600 -6640 SW 57 AVENUE AND 5757 SW 68 STREET; SETTING FORTH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RELATED TO SITE, . TRAFFIC, SIGNAGE, AND URBAN DESIGN ISSUES, AND CONSTRUCTION OF APPROPRIATE PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND LANDSCAPING. AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO FLORIDA STATE STATUE 163.3221 `FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT -MIXED USE PROJECT KNOWN AS RED ROAD COMMONS .LOCATED AT 6600 -6640 SW 57 AVENUE AND 5757 SW 68 STREET; THE DEVELOPMENT WILL INCLUDE BUILDINGS OF UP TO FIVE (5) STORIES IN HEIGHT AND THE FOLLOWING USES: UP TO 409 MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS, RETAIL USES, OFFICE USES AND A PARKING GARAGE SPECIAL NOTE Pursuant to Florida State Statue 163 3221 interested persons are advised that in addition to the information set forth above the proposed project.. will be built on a seven acre tract of land and will have a dwelling unit density of. 58.3 units per acre and a floor- area -ratio (FAR) of 1.54. The estimated population density of the project is 132 persons per acre. A copy of the development agreement can be obtained at the South Miami Planning. Department at the address shown above. Inquiries concerning this item should be directed to the Planning Department at 305-663-6326. ALL interested parties are invited to attend and will be heard.. Made M. Menendez City Clerk Pursuant to Florida Statutes 286.0105, the City hereby advises the public that If a person / decides to appeal any decision made by this Board, Agency or commission with respect to any matter considered at Its meeting or hearing, he or she will need a record of the proceedings, and that for such purpose, affected person may need to ensure that a varba6m record of the proceedings is made which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.