03-01-05 Item 8To: Honorable Mayor, Vice Mayor& Date: March 1, 2005
Commission Members
ITEM No. is
From: Maria Davis Re: Special Exception Request
City Manager SR(HD -OV) Hometown Overlay
Project Sunset — 5750 Sunset Dr.
RESOLUTION:
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH
MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO A REQUEST PURSUANT TO SECTION 20 -7.51 OF THE
LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOR "PROJECT SUNSET" A
UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN THE "SR(HD -OV)" SPECIALITY RETAIL
(HOMETOWN DISTRICT OVERLAY) ZONING DISTRICT TO PERMIT: (1) A SPECIAL
EXCEPTION TO SECTIONS 20 -7.7B AND 20 -7.9B IN ORDER TO ALLOW A TOTAL LOT
COVERAGE OF 72.29% OR 139,435 SQUARE FEET WHICH EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM 60%
LOT COVERAGE AND 60,000 SQUARE FEET; (2) A SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO SECTION 20-
7.9B TO ALLOW FOUR (4) BANK DRIVE -THRU LANES WHICH EXCEED THE MAXIMUM
PERMITTED TWO (2) BANK DRIVE -THRU LANES; ALL FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY
LOCATED AT 5750 SUNSET DRIVE AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 6 THRU 9, 40
THRU 45, 53 THRU 66 INCLUSIVE AND THE EAST 50 FEET OF LOTS 51 AND 52 OF W. A.
LARKINS SUBDIVISION ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT
BOOK 3 AT PAGE 198 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI -DADE COUNTY; PROVIDING
FOE SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST
The applicant, South Miami Corporation, is requesting approval to construct a unified development on
property in the SR(HD -OV) zoning district. The site is a 4.5 acre property as legally described above,
including public land area which will be part of the project's arcades. The proposed development covers
parts of three blocks in the City's downtown. The project includes three mixed use buildings with the
following total land uses: 108 dwelling units; 87,212 square feet of commercial space (retail, offices, bank,
restaurants; and 649 parking spaces. The proposed unified development requires the Planning Board's
recommendation and approval by the City Commission, because the applicant is requesting two special
exceptions to modify regulations pertaining to lot coverage and number of drive -thru teller lanes. The
applicant in a separate application is also requesting special use approval for four proposed restaurants
which will be part of the development program.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
The special exception section in the Hometown Overlay District regulations (Sec.20 -7.51) allows for the
City Commission to waive compliance with any of the requirements or standards in the chapter upon a
LDC Special Exception
South Miami Corp.
Page 2 of 4
finding that the proposed development complies with and implements seven economic and design
objectives of the Hometown Overlay zone. These objectives are spelled out in the "Special Exception"
section, which is attached.
The procedure for approving special exceptions requires a public hearing before the Planning Board and
then a second public hearing before the City Commission. Both newspaper notice and mail notices are
required. This process is spelled out in Sec, 20 -7.52, "Procedure for special exception ", which is attached.
REQUESTED SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS
Lot Coverage / Maximum Sq.Ft. Per Building The applicant is requesting a waiver to allow an overall lot
coverage (three blocks) of 139, 435 square feet which is 72.29% of the total site. The Hometown Overlay
District's regulating graphic plan (Sec.20 -7.9B) limits lot coverage to 60% and the amount of lot coverage
square footage to 20,000 sq.ft. per building.
Drive - Through Tellers. The applicant is requesting a special exception to allow for four lanes of drive -
through tellers as part of its new bank facility located on the ground floor level in the Block "A"
development. It appears that vehicles will enter the facility from SW 73 Street and exit on SW 57 Court.
The Hometown Overlay District `s regulating graphic plan (Sec.20 -7.9B) allows for no more than two
drive though facilities on downtown side streets.
STAFF OBSERVATIONS
• The proposed development incorporating all three major land uses is consistent with the objectives of
the Hometown Overlay District Mixed Use standards specified in LDC Sec.20- 7.2(E).
• The proposed development is consistent with the LDC Sec. 20- 7.2(D) which sets forth the following
standards: height limit of 4 stories, density of 24 units per acre and a non - residential floor area ratio of
.45 ( maximum FAR permitted is 1.6)
• The special exception for two additional drive- thru tellers is acceptable as it is located entirely
internal within the first floor of Building A; Staff supports the internal vehicle circulation for the
teller function. It is important to note that it is the staffs interpretation that this special exception
request may not be required in that the subject teller lanes are not free - standing uses but are accessory
to the bank function.
• The special exception for exceeding the 60 % lot coverage limit for the unified development is a result
of a building design which incorporates the required parking as an internal garage located in the core
center of Blocks A and B. The Zoning Task Force in 2002 recognized this as a future issue and
recommended that the Hometown Overlay District Regulating Plan be revised to add the following:
"Lot Coverage =80% maximum if garage construction provides all required parkin
The Planning Board during its review of the Task Force's Hometown regulations in November, 2004
endorsed this revision as part of a new chapter on zoning districts.
• The granting of special exceptions require a finding by the City that the below listed seven conditions
are applicable to the project. (Sec.20- 7.51):
(1) The proposed development contributes to, promotes and encourages the improvement of
LDC Special Exception
South Miami Corp.
Page 3 of 4
the Hometown District and catalyzes other development as envisioned in the Hometown
District regulations.
(2) The proposed development is compatible with the land uses and development intensities
prescribed by all applicable city regulations.
(3) The proposed development must possess integrity of design compatible with the design
criteria established for the Hometown District and with the overall image of the city.
(4) The proposed development shall be designed in a manner that provides for effective
management of traffic (vehicular and pedestrian), parking, lighting, noise and waste
generated by the development, and management of the impacts of the development on
public facilities and services.
(5) The proposed development does not expand the permitted uses within the Hometown
District.
(6) The proposed development will not have an unfavorable effect on the economy of the City
of South Miami.
(7) The proposed development, when considered cumulatively with other development, both
present and future, within the Hometown District, will not create excessive overcrowding
or concentration of people or population.
The staff has compared the project to each of the seven criteria listed in the LDC, and has determined that
the proposed development advances the economic development of the City and is compatible with land
use, density, and design criteria established for the Hometown District. Based upon this review the
Planning Department finds that the proposed development supports the granting of special exceptions.
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
Staff was concerned about the impact of traffic on the streets which contain exits and entrances to the
development. The Planning Department hired a consultant to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (Feb.,2005)
for consideration prior to approval of the special exception. Attached is a copy of that study carried out by
Cathy Sweetapple and Associates. The report concludes on p.l l that all roadways adjacent to the project
were found to be operating during PM peaks at acceptable levels of service currently and through the
build -out of the project. A second report (February 8, 2005) on specific intersection traffic is also attached
The staff and the consultant agree that the parking lot driveway for Block C on SW 58 Avenue should be
modified in order to avoid a conflict with the garage entrance to Block B, also on SW 58 Avenue. It is
recommended that the driveway be eliminated or modified to be limited to a right turn out and right turn
in only. I
PLANNING BOARD ACTION
The Planning Board at its February 22, 2005 meeting adopted a motion by a vote of 5 ayes 0
nays, recommending approval of the special exception application with conditions set forth by
staff.
LDC Special Exception
South Miami Corp.
Page 4 of 4
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the special exception application be approved with the following conditions:
• The applicant must agree that all street, sidewalk and street furniture improvements must be
consistent with the design and material specifications as set forth by the City in its downtown street
improvement program.
• The parking lot driveway for Block C on SW 58 Avenue should be eliminated or modified to be
limited to a right turn out and right turn in only.
Attachments:
Draft Resolution
Application / Letter of Intent
Location map
Survey / Plans
LDC Sec. 20- 7.51/.52
Traffic Impact Study
Feb. 8, 2005 Memo on Intersections
Copies of Public Notices
MD /DOD /S Y
E:\PB\PB Agendas Staff Reports\2005 Agendas Staff Reports\2- 22- 05\PB -05 -001 Special Excep 5750 Sunset .doc
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH
MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO A REQUEST PURSUANT TO SECTION 20 -7.51 OF THE
LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOR "PROJECT SUNSET" A
UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN THE "SR(HD -OV)" SPECIALITY RETAIL
(HOMETOWN DISTRICT OVERLAY) ZONING DISTRICT TO PERMIT: (1) A SPECIAL
EXCEPTION TO SECTIONS 20 -7.7B AND 20 -7.9B IN ORDER TO ALLOW A TOTAL LOT
COVERAGE OF 72.29% OR 139,435 SQUARE FEET WHICH EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM 60%
LOT COVERAGE AND 60,000 SQUARE FEET; (2) A SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO SECTION 20-
7.9B TO ALLOW FOUR (4) BANK DRIVE -THRU LANES WHICH EXCEED THE MAXIMUM
PERMITTED TWO (2) BANK DRIVE -THRU LANES; ALL FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY
LOCATED AT 5750 SUNSET DRIVE AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 6 THRU 9, 40
THRU 45, 53 THRU 66 INCLUSIVE AND THE EAST 50 FEET OF LOTS 51 AND 52 OF W. A.
LARKINS SUBDIVISION ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT
BOOK 3 AT PAGE 198 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI -DADE COUNTY; PROVIDING
FOE SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the, South Miami Corporation, has submitted Application No. PB -05 -001
requesting approval to construct a unified development in the SR(HD -OV) zoning district. on property
as legally described above, said project includes three mixed use buildings with the following total land
uses: 108 dwelling units; 87,212 square feet of commercial space (retail, offices, bank, restaurants; and
649 parking spaces; and
WHEREAS, the applicant is requesting a special exception to allow an overall lot coverage (three
blocks) of 139,435 square feet which is 72.29% of the total site which exceeds. the Hometown Overlay
District regulating graphic plan (Sec.20 -7.9B) which limits lot coverage to 60% and the amount of lot
coverage square footage to 20,000 sq. ft. per building; and
WHEREAS, the applicant is requesting a special exception to allow for four lanes of drive -
through tellers as part of its new bank facility located on the ground floor level in the Block "A"
development which exceeds the Hometown Overlay District regulating graphic plan (Sec.20 -7.9B) which
allows for no more than two drive though facilities on downtown side streets; and
' WHEREAS, a special exception request in the Hometown Overlay District requires the Planning
Board's recommendation and approval by the City Commission; and
WHEREAS, after review and consideration, the Planning Department recommended approval
of the application with conditions ; and
WHEREAS, on February 22, 2005 the Planning Board after public hearing voted 5 ayes 0
nays to recommend approval with specific conditions; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission desires to accept the recommendation of the Planning
Board and enact the aforesaid resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The City has determined that the proposed development project advances the economic
development of the City and is compatible with land use, density, and design criteria established for the
1 Hometown District, as set forth in LDC Sec.20 -7.51, which includes seven criteria necessary for
2 approving special exceptions:
3
4 (1) The proposed development contributes to, promotes and encourages the improvement of the
5 Hometown District and catalyzes other development as envisioned in the Hometown
6 District regulations.
7
8 (2) The proposed development is compatible with the land uses and development intensities
9 prescribed by all applicable city regulations.
10
11 (3) The proposed development must possess integrity of design compatible with the design
12 criteria established for the Hometown District and with the overall image of the city.
13
14 (4) The proposed development shall be designed in a manner that provides for effective
15 management of traffic (vehicular and pedestrian), parking, lighting, noise and waste
16 generated by the development, and management of the impacts of the development public
17 facilities and services.
18
19 (5) The proposed development does not expand the permitted uses within the Hometown
20 District.
21
22 (6) The proposed development will not have an unfavorable effect on the economy of the City
23 of South Miami.
24
25 (7) The proposed development, when considered cumulatively with other development, both
26 present and future, within the Hometown District, will not create excessive overcrowding or
27 concentration of people or population.
28
29 Section 2. That the subject application submitted by the South Miami Corporation, requesting a special
30 exception to allow an overall lot coverage (three blocks) of 139,435 square feet which is 72.29% of the
31 total site which exceeds the Hometown Overlay District regulating graphic plan (Sec.20 -7.9B) which limits
32 lot coverage to 60% and the amount of lot coverage square footage to 20,000 sq. ft. per building, is hereby
33 approved subject to conditions set forth in Section 4 below.
34
35
36 Section 3 That the subject application submitted by the South Miami Corporation requesting a special
37 exception to allow for four lanes of drive- through tellers as part of its new bank facility located on the
38 ground floor level in the Block "A" development which exceeds the Hometown Overlay District
39 regulating graphic plan (Sec.20 -7.9B) which allows for no more than two drive though facilities on
40 downtown side streets, is hereby approved subject to conditions set forth in Section 4 below
41
42
43 Section 4. The special exception application is approved subject to the following conditions:
44
45 • The applicant must agree that all street, sidewalk and street furniture improvements must be
46 consistent with the design and material specifications as set forth by the City in its downtown street
47 improvement program.
48
49 • The parking lot driveway for Block C on SW 58 Avenue should be eliminated or modified to be limited
50 to a right turn out and right turn in only.
51
52
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
Section 5. This resolution shall be effective immediately after the adoption hereof.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this , day of 32005.
ATTEST: APPROVED:
CITY CLERK
READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY
74 KIM •;
Commission Vote:
Mayor Russell:
Vice Mayor Palmer
Commissioner Wiscombe:
Commissioner Birts- Cooper
Commissioner Sherar:
\\MCGRUFF\PLANNING\Comm Items\2005 \3 -1 -05 \Special Exception SM Bank Project Resolution.doc
COURTESY NOTICE
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA
On Tuesday, March 1, 2005, beginning at 7:30 p.m., in the City
Commission Chambers, 6130 Sunset Drive, the City Commission will hold
Public Hearings to consider the following items:
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO
FLORIDA STATE STATUTE 163.3221 FOR A UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
KNOWN AS "PROJECT SUNSET" WHICH WILL INCLUDE THREE BUILDINGS UP
TO FOUR (4) STORIES IN HEIGHT AND THE FOLLOWING USES: 106 MULTI-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS, RETAIL USES, OFFICE USES, RESTAURANTS, BANK
AND A PARKING GARAGES; ALL FOR PROPERTY LOCATED GENERALLY AT 5750
SUNSET DRIVE AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 6 THRU 9, 40 THRU 45, 53
THRU 66 INCLUSIVE AND THE EAST 50 FEET OF LOTS 51 AND 52 OF W. A.
LARKINS SUBDIVISION ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT
BOOK 3 AT PAGE 198 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI -DADE COUNTY.
A RESOLUTION RELATING TO A REQUEST PURSUANT TO SECTION 20 -7.51 OF
THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOR "PROJECT
SUNSET" A UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN THE "SR(HD -OV)" SPECIALTY
RETAIL (HOMETOWN DISTRICT OVERLAY) ZONING DISTRICT TO PERMIT: (1) A
SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO SECTIONS 20 -7.7B AND 20 -7.913 IN ORDER TO ALLOW A
TOTAL LOT COVERAGE OF 72.29% OR 139,435 SQUARE FEET WHICH EXCEEDS
THE MAXIMUM 60% LOT COVERAGE AND 60,000 SQUARE FEET; (2) A SPECIAL
EXCEPTION TO SECTION 20 -7.9B TO ALLOW FOUR BANK DRIVE -THRU LANES
WHICH EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED TWO BANK DRIVE -THRU LANES;
ALL FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 5750 SUNSET DRIVE AND
LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 6 THRU 9, 40 THRU 45, 53 THRU 66 INCLUSIVE
AND THE EAST 50 FEET OF LOTS 51 AND 52 OF W. A. LARKINS SUBDIVISION
ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK. 3 AT PAGE 19§
OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI -DADE COUNTY. e
A RESOLUTION RELATING TO A REQUEST PURSUANT TO SECTION 20-
3.4(B)(4)(b) OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR A SPECIAL USE APPROVAL
TO LOCATE FOUR GENERAL RESTAURANTS AS PART OF "PROJECT SUNSET"
A UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE "SR (HD -OV)" SPECIALTY RETAIL
(HOMETOWN DISTRICT OVERLAY) ZONING DISTRICT ALL FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED GENERALLY AT 5750 SUNSET DRIVE AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS
LOTS 6 THRU 9, 40 THRU 45, 53 THRU 66 INCLUSIVE AND THE EAST 50 FEET OF
LOTS 51 AND 52 OF W. A. LARKINS SUBDIVISION ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3 AT PAGE 198 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS
OF MIAMI -DADE COUNTY.
A RESOLUTION RELATING TO A REQUEST PURSUANT TO SECTION 20- 8.9(B) OF
THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR A SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPROVAL TO
LOCATE A LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENT USE (SIX STORY MIXED USE MEDICAL
OFFICE / RETAIL) BUILDING AT 7150 -7160 SW 62otl AVENUE IN THE "TODD (MU-
5)", TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (MIXED USE 5).
Inquiries concerning the above two items should be directed to the
Planning Department at 305 - 663 -6326.
ALL interested parties are invited to attend and will be heard.
Maria M. Menendez
City Clerk
Pursuant to Florida Statutes 286.0105, the City hereby advises the public that if a person
decides to appeal any decision made by this Board, Agency or Commission with respect to any
matter considered at its meeting or hearing, he or she will need a record of the proceedings, and
that for such purpose, affected person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the
proceedings is made which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal
is to be based.
Get advice that's
always on the money.
Read Harriet Johnson Brackey in Money Moments, everyThurday.
Never Argue
With Your Contractor
That's Our Job
19 IN
McCrea Construction Consultants
— The Owners Champion —
We provide affordable, expert consulting services
directly to homeowners and business owners.
Residential, Commercial, New, or Remodeling
Owners pay all the bills but know least about the
business. No wonder we've all heard construction
horror stories. Don't be another one.
Get a Champion on your side. Call today!
305- 66776702
www.mccrea.biz
CGC 049690
PREMIER POOLs
sy iL St l POOLS, INC.
Pool Designing and Construction
• Complete Pool Renovations
Salt Sanitizing, Systems
Resurfacing Interiors
Heating Systems L
Coping & Tile Renovations '
Decks: Stone, Brick & Hooldeck
•. Repiping &.Equipment
Waterfall Designs
• New Deck Installations
City of South Miami
Planning & Zoning Department
City Hall, 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida 33143
Telephone: (305) 663 -6326; Fax: (305) 666 -4591
Application For Public Hearing Before Planning Board & City Commission
ho 1, rutA6L INL)ICATE YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO THIS PROJECT:
XXOwner .Owner's Representative _Contract to purchase _Option to purchase — Tenant/Lessee
4PPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE FOR THE FOLLOWING:
PLEASE CHECK THE APPROPRIATE ITEM:
Text Amendment to LDC - Variance
® Zoning Map Amendment X.XSpecial Use
® PUD Approval X.XSpecial Exception
PUD Major Change XXOtherD e ve 1 op inen t
Approval
riefly explain application and cite specific Code sections:
SEE LETTER OF INTENT
Section: Subsection: Page #: Amended Date:
SUBMITTED MATERIALS
PLEASE CHECK ALL THAT APPLY:
XXLetfer of intent
® Justifications for change
_ Statement of hardship
XXProof of ownership or letter from owner
® Power of attorney
® Contract to purchase
XXCurrent surrey (1 original sealed and
signed/1 reduced copy @ 11" x 1T)
!X15 copies of Site Plan and Floor Plans
1 reduced copy @ 11" x 17'
XXfFT ct agVJ1A &- 9""&&
xXMailing labels (3 sets) and map
XXRequired Fee(s)
The undersigned has read this completed application and represents that the information and all submitted materials are true and
correct to the best of the applicant's knowledge and belief.
I)e emb r 10 200
Applicant's Signa a and title _ � 4
Date
Upon receipt, appplications and all submitted materials will be reviewed for compliance with the Land Development Code and other
applicable regulations. Applications found not in compliance will be rejected and returned to the applicant.
OFFICE USE ONLY:
Date Filed Date of PB Hearing Date of Commission
Petition Required Petition Accepted
Method of Pavment
W. TUCKER GIBBS
ATTORNEY AT LAW
215 GRAND AVENUE
P.O. Box 1.050
COCONUT GROVE, FLORIDA 33133
TELEPHONE (305) 448 -8486
FACSDZ LE (305) 448 -0773 _
December 20, 2004
Don O'Donniley, Director
Planning and zoning Department
6130 Sunset Drive
South Miami, FL 33143
Re: Amended Letter of Intent for 5750 Sunset Drive.
Dear Mr. O'Donnileyc
I represent The South Miami Corporation, owner of the
referenced property zoned SR, Specialty Retail with a HD-
OV, Hometown District Overlay.
I am pleased to present to the Planning Board and City
Commission for their review and consideration the attached
application for development approval in the Home Town
District. This application sets forth my client's plan for
a mixed -use development with retail, office and residential
components at 5750 Sunset Drive.
This project will be built on three contiguous blocks
bounded generally by Sunset Drive and S.W. 73rd Street to
the north, S.W. 74th Street to the south, S.W. 57th Court to
the east and S.W. 58th Avenue and S.W. 58th Court to the
west. The site will be subject to a unity of title. It
includes 37,379 square feet of retail uses (of which 13,821
square feet is for restaurants), 17,713 square feet of bank
facilities, 32,120 square feet of office uses and 108
residential units. The height of this development will not
exceed the 56 -foot, four story maximum as set forth in the
Home Town Plan. There will be 649 parking spaces provided,
which are 50 more than the parking required in the Home
Town Plan.
This application includes the following:
1. A development agreement that establishes the design
parameters of this project and includes requests for
two special exceptions and one special use permit.
2. A special exception to section 20 -7.9B, per section
20 -7.51 to permit four drive- through lanes for the
bank.
3.A special exception to section 20 -7.7B, per 20 -7.51 to
permit +/ -72.2% or 139,435 square feet of lot
coverage
4.A special use permit per section 20 -3.4 and 20 -5.8 to
permit 13,821 square feet of restaurant use.
We look forward to presenting our application to the
planning board and the city commission. The design team and
I are available to provide you and your staff any
additional information you require in your review of this
application. Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
W. Tucker Gibbs
enclosures
ccc Victor Dover
Wade Wacholz, Esq.
City of South Miami
PB -05 -001 PB -05 -002
Project Sunset - 5750 Sunset Drive
Special Exceptions / Special Use Approvals
S 5839 Se Sys' A" s m
s e� y �p 5760 H
EP 9 0 sd - 6T
s
c.
6900 yeti M s� o o
o h se sQ 5810 a
5842 �y
5821 H
7 5850
Cn
M
�
rn
N
o
ti
0)
M
0)
o
0
SW 71ST S
CJ
H
e
ry0 vii H
yy
T 5830
S
CY) 12
0 Ln 00 CO
f, c0 co
to
). OV .hey h W
� a 031. o h LW
'S 5 � � t1
� H
SW 72ND ST 5693 5900 72ND T SUNSET DR
0 5904 0 � 0 0
o° 5g6 5920 5800
0
6022
o to 10
7410
r 500
7530
5991
5890 0
�n
5800
J
0
d
7641
J
w
CO
Cl)
20
Q
a
7505
7500 7500 m
7521
a
7510 7520 H
H
�
7533
H
7530 7550 H
7549
m
Lo-74
CO
7520
U)
5890 0
�n
5800
J
7515
7500^�O
`7532
7641
N
w
CO
to
7563
7548
bO�TH Tt'
57845785 57745772
7601 1 7600 7601 7600 7611 a 5862 7610
)n u7 h y1
�O
0
<O 0
r- 5730 7450 w
H
a
7505
7500 7500 m
7521
a
7510 7520 H
H
7533
H
7530 7550 H
7549
m
7601 1 7600 7601 7600 7611 a 5862 7610
)n u7 h y1
20 -7.51 SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
20 -7.51 Special exception.
(A) The city commission may, by special exception, waive strict compliance with the
provisions of the Hometown District Overlay Ordinance [this article].. In granting a special
exception, the city commission must find by substantial competent evidence that:
(1) The proposed development contributes to, promotes and encourages the improvement
of the Hometown District and catalyzes other development as envisioned in the
Hometown District regulations.
(2) The proposed development is compatible with the land uses and development inten-
sities prescribed by all applicable city regulations.
(3) The proposed development must possess integrity of design compatible with the design
criteria established for the Hometown District and with the overall image of the city.
(4) The proposed development shall be designed in a manner that provides for effective
management of traffic (vehicular and pedestrian), parking, lighting, noise and waste
generated by the development, and management of the impacts of the development on
public facilities and services.
(5) The proposed development does not expand the permitted uses within the Hometown.
District:
(6) The proposed development will not have an unfavorable effect on the economy of the
City of South Miami.
(7) The proposed development, when considered cumulatively with other development,
both present and future, within the Hometown District, will not create excessive
overcrowding or concentration of people or population.
(B) The city commission, in granting any special exception, may prescribe any reasonable
conditions, restrictions, and limitations it deems necessary or desirable, in order to preserve
and promote the intent of the Hometown District Overlay Ordinance.
(C) Special exceptions, if granted, shall be valid only for the specific design shown in the
plans and exhibits submitted as part of the special exception application, as provided in
Section 20- 7.52 -of this Code. All deviations from the requirements of the Hometown District
Overlay Ordinance incorporated within and reflected on the site plan and exhibits shall be
considered a part of the application. Approval of the site plan and exhibits by the city
commission shall constitute approval of the nonuse deviations identified on the site plan and
exhibits unless the city commission approves a motion to the contrary. No further individual
or separate application for deviations approved by the city commission shall be required. If the
applicant wishes to make material changes to the design subsequent to receiving a special
exception, the applicant must apply for a new special exception following the procedure set
forth herein.
(D) Special. exceptions, if granted, shall be valid if development, as defined in Section
380.04, Florida Statutes, commences within twenty -four (24) months from the date of final
approval and is substantially completed within five (5) years from the date of issuance of the
Supp. No. 7 180
HOMETOWN DISTRICT OVERLAY ORDINANCE 20 -7.52
first building permit. The time for substantial completion may be extended by the city
commission upon application filed prior to the expiration of the substantial completion period
and upon demonstration of good cause.
(Ord. No. 19 -94 -1569, § 1, 11 -1 -94)
20 -7.52 Procedure for special exception.
(A) Special exceptions under Ordinance No. 19 -94 -1569 [Sections 20 -7.51, 20 -7.52] may be
granted only after a minimum of two (2) public hearings. The first public hearing shall be
before the planning board, at which time the planning board shall review the project and
provide to the city commission an advisory recommendation regarding
conditions g g approval, approval with
or disapproval. The second public hearing shall be held before the city commission
and shall be held no sooner than seven (7) calendar days following the planning board hearing.
Public notice requirements, as specified in Section 20- 5.5(C) and (G), Applications requiring
public hearings, shall be followed.
(B) Requests for special exceptions under Ordinance No. 19 -94 -1569 [Sections 20 -7.51,
20 -7.521 shall be in a form acceptable to the city manager and shall include each exhibit
required per Section 20- 7.3(B), Application for Development Permit, and per Section 20 -7.4,
Site Plan Requirements. In addition, the city commission, at its discretion, may require
additional exhibits and may defer approval of the special exception application or schedule an
additional public hearing or hearings to review those exhibits.
(C) The city manager shall have authority to require additional review and approval by the
environmental review and preservation board for developments involving special exception,
which review shall follow the procedure set forth in Section 20 -5.11 of this Code.
(D) The city commission may grant a special exception upon four (4) affirmative votes of its
members.
(Ord. No. 19 -94 -1569, § 1, 11 -1 -94)
Supp. No. 7 181
SOUTH MIAMI CORPORATION
�vneQl Topographic Survey
0
I
td
0
"
~
~
~
`
~
~
`
," ",,. .°"",
Lip
Is
~
~
~
`
~
~
`
," ",,. .°"",
South Miami
Mixed Use Development
February 2005
Prepared for:
The City of South Miami
CATHY SWEETAPPLE & ASSOCIATES
TRANSPORTATION AND MOBILITY PLANNING
South Miami Mixed Use
Traffic Impact Study
Introduction
This Traffic Impact Study has been prepared on behalf of the City of South Miami to evaluate the traffic impacts of a mixed
use infill residential, retail, bank and office project located on portions of three city blocks within the Hometown District of
the City of South Miami. The project is bounded by Sunset Boulevard /SW 72nd Avenue on the north, SW 57th Court on
the east, SW 74th Street on the south, and SW 58th Court on the west as depicted on the enclosed Figures 1 and 2. The
proposed redevelopment site is situated within the Miami -Dade County Urban Infill Area and is located approximately
three blocks south of the South Miami Metro -Rail Station. The site is partially occupied today with retail, restaurant and
bank uses, including a bank drive - through operation, public parking for downtown shoppers and contract parking for
monthly parking tenants.
A Traffic Impact Study has been prepared as part of the site plan review process to identify the peak hour turning
movements at the project driveways, the existing traffic on the surrounding roadway network, and the future traffic
conditions with the development of the project site. Existing and future traffic conditions have been evaluated on adjacent
study area roadways and at adjacent intersections providing access to the regional roadway network.
Development Proqram and Project Access
The proposed redevelopment site plan is included in the enclosed Figure 3 and includes the uses listed in Table 1A
below. Site uses are designed to wrap around the perimeter of each block, with parking located within the block's interior.
The enclosed Figure 4 identifies the proposed project access locations, where project access to the interior structured
parking is provided off of SW 57th Court and SW 73rd Street for Block A, SW 57th Court and SW 58th Avenue for Block B,
and SW 58th Avenue and SW 58th Court for Block C. Ingress and egress to the interior structured parking is well
organized and centrally located for each block, with the only potential conflict arising along SW 58th Avenue where the at
grade driveway serving the 16 dwelling units located in Block C is located within 40 feet from the driveway serving
structured parking for Block B.
Tahla 1 a _ Prnnneari nakialnmmanf Drnnrnm
Type of Use
Block A
Block B
Block C
Total
TownhomeslRowhouse
37 du
55 du
16 du
108 du
Ground Level Retail
12,401 sf
11,157 sf
-
23,558 sf
Restaurant
6,028 sf
7,793 sf
-
13,821 sf
Bank with Drive Thru
17,713 sf with 4 lanes
-
-
17,713 sf
Office
15,986 sf
18,637 sf
-
34,623 sf
The site is currently occupied with bank, retail, restaurant and parking as outlined in Table 1 B below.
Tahla 1R _ Fviefinn I lone nn Cifn
Type of Use
Scale of Existing Uses
Block Location
Bank
27,481 sf
Block A
Ground Level Retail
2,400 sf
Block A
Restaurant
1,500 sf
Block A
Bank Drive Thru Lanes
7 lanes
Block B
Public Parking
227 spaces
Blocks B and C
Cathy Sweetapple & Associates
February 2005
1
South Miami Mixed Use Traffic Impact Study
City of South Miami
Legend
Figure 1
Site Location Location Map
South Miami Mixed Use Development
January 2005
Source: Cathy Sweetapple & Associates
Legend
Figure 2
Site Location Block Location Aerial View of the Site South Miami Mixed Use Development
January 2005
Source: Cathy Sweetapple & Associates
76CldI1PL IIIEET RIMIMAL 9RFET.
SW 74TH STREET SW 74TH STREET
Legend
Figure 3
Proposed Redevelopment Plan
Site Location South Miami Mixed Use Development
January 2005
Source: Cathy Sweetapple & Associates
SUNaET DRIVE
W
U � �
i
S W 7 3 R D 5 7 R E E T
r�rc
0
g U'
S f
m 4
m_
5V1 74TH STREE'T
■nm et�'r
SUNSET DRIVE
SW 73RD S T R E E T
rtrovnw� 1u
SW 74TH STREET
1�■I
0
U
+y F-
A
0
�a
lox
t
Legend
Figure 4
Site Location Vehicular access to each redevelopment block Project Access Locations
South Miami Mixed Use Development
January 2005
Source: Cathy Sweetapple & Associates
Project Trip Generation
A trip generation analysis has been prepared to estimate the daily, AM peak hour and PM peak hour project trips
generated by the proposed redevelopment program. Trip generation has been estimated using the rates and equations
from ITE Trip Generation, 7th Edition. ITE LUC 230 for townhomes and condominiums has been used for the residential
units, ITE LUC 814 for specialty retail has been used to generate the trips for the ground level retail uses for the daily
and PM peak hour timeframe. ITE LUC.820 is used for the AM peak hour timeframe since there is no AM peak hour
specialty retail trip rate in ITE. ITE LUC 932 is used to generate the trips for high turnover sit down restaurant space. ITE
LUC 912 is used to generate the trips for the bank with drive in lanes, and ITE LUC 710 has been used to generate the
trips for the office space within the site. A modest internalization of ground level retail space and ground level restaurant
space has been included in the analysis equal to 20% of the daily retail and restaurant trips and 10% of the AM and PM
peak hour retail and restaurant trips. The combined internalization equates to 7% of the gross daily trips, 4% of the gross
AM trips and 2% of the gross PM trips. A joint pedestrian and transit reduction has then been applied equal to 20% of the
remaining daily external trips and 10% of the remaining AM and PM external trips. A summary of the trip generation
calculations are provided in Table 2A below. The detailed trip generation analysis is provided in the attached Table 213.
The trip generation calculations provided in the enclosed Tables 2A and 2B also incorporate the trips generated by the
existing bank, retail and restaurant uses on site. The net new external trips for the project reflects 215 AM peak hour
trips, 51 PM peak hour trips and 802 daily trips.
Table 2A - Summary of Total Project Drivewav Volumes for the Proposed Uses
t e, a im ezisutog nee trips reriect au-le or the exIsung gross trips aver incorporating a zu id peuestrian reduction.
Cathy Sweetapple & Associates South Miami Mixed Use Traffic Impact Study
February 2005 City of South Miami
6
Time frame
Inbound
Outbound
Site Total
Gross Trips
AM
324
255
579
Internalization
AM
11
12
23
Pedestrian and Transit
AM
17
39
56
Driveway
AM
296
204
500
Existing Gross Trips
AM
200
156
356
Existing Net Trips [1]
AM
160
125
285
Net New Trips
AM
136
79
215
„77
};5 r, w, 1; �
Ya rb$
7777
Gross Trips
PM
594
627
1,221
Internalization
PM
12
11
23
Pedestrian and Transit
PM
67
53
120
Driveway
PM
515
563
1,078;
Existing Gross Trips
PM
640
644
1,284
Existing Net Trips [1]
PM
512
515
1,027
Net New Trips
PM
3
48
51
77, .-
¢
s $ 7 vC Y U
YES s .
C. �
S
Gross Trips
Daily
4,222
4,220
8,442
Internalization
Daily
49
51
560
Pedestrian and Transit
Daily
87
87
1,576
Driveway
Daily
3,154
3,152
6,306
Existing Gross Trips
Daily
3,440
3,440
6,880
Existing Net Trips [1]
Daily
2,752
2,752
5,504
Net New Trips
Daily
402
400
802
t e, a im ezisutog nee trips reriect au-le or the exIsung gross trips aver incorporating a zu id peuestrian reduction.
Cathy Sweetapple & Associates South Miami Mixed Use Traffic Impact Study
February 2005 City of South Miami
6
TABLE 2B
SOUTH MIAMI MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT
DAILY, AM AND PM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION
nq- Foh -n,
LAND USE
UNITS
ITE
LUC
ITE 7TH EDITION
RATE OR FORMULA
DAILY
TRIPS
IN
OUT
%
TRIPS
I %e
TRIPS
RESIDENTIAL CONDOS/TOWNHOMES/LIVE WORK LOFTS
SPECIALTY GROUND LEVEL RETAIL
RESTAURANT
BANK WITH DRIVE IN LANES
OFFICE
108 DU
23,558 SQ. FT
13,821 SQ. FT.
17,713 SO. FT
34,623 SO. FTj
230
814
932
912
710
Ln (T) = 0.85 Ln (X) + 2.55
T = 44.32 (X)
T = 127.15 (X)
T = 246.49 (X)
Ln (T) = 0.77 Ln (X) + 3.65
685
1,044
1,757
4,366
590
50%
50%
50 %
50%
50%
343
522
879
2,183
295
50%
50%
50%
- 50%
50%
342
522
878
2,183
295
GROSS TOTAL TRIPS
8,442
50%
4,222
50%
4,220
INTERNALIZATION OF GROUND LEVEL RETAIL
20%
Reduction of 20% of the retail trips
209
50%
104
50%
105
INTERNALIZATION OF RESTAURANT
-
20%
Reduction of 20% of the rest. trips
351
50%
176
. 50%
175
SUBTOTAL INTERNAL CAPTURE OF GROSS TRIPS
7%
Internalization as a % of Gross Trips
560
50%
280
50%
280
PEDESTRIAN AND/OR TRANSIT REDUCTION OF EXTERNAL TRIPS
20%
Reduction of 20% of the external trips
1,576
50%
788
50%
788
NET EXTERNAL TRIPS
6,306
50 %
3,154
50%
3,152
EXISTING BANK WITH DRIVE IN LANES
27,481 SO. FT
- 912
T = 246.49 (X)
6,774
50%
3,387
50%
3,387
EXISTING RETAIL
2,400 SO. FT
814
T = 44.32 (X)
106
50%
53
50%
53
EXISTING RESTAURANT
1,500 SQ. FT
932
T = 127.15 (X)
191
50%
95
50%
96
GROSS TRIPS FOR EXISTING USES
6,880
' 50%
3,440
50%
3,440
NET EXTERNAL TRIPS FOR EXISTING USES
With a 20% transit/pedestrian reduction
5,504
2,752
2,752
NET;NEW EXTERNAL TRIPS (PROPOSED -EXISTING)
802
50%
402
''50%
400
LAND USE
UNITS
ITE
LUC
ITE 7TH EDITION
RATE OR FORMULA
AM
TRIPS
IN
OUT
%
TRIPS
%
TRIPS
RESIDENTIAL CONDOS/TOWNHOMESILIVE WORK LOFTS
SPECIALTY GROUND LEVEL RETAIL
RESTAURANT
BANK WITH DRIVE IN LANES
OFFICE
108 DU
23,558 SQ. FT
13,821 SQ. FT
17,713 SQ. FT
34,623 SQ. FT.
230
820
932
912
710
Ln (T) = 0.80 Ln (X) + 0.26
Ln (T) = 0.60 Ln (X) + 2.29
T = 11.52 (X)
T = 12.34 (X)
Ln (T) = 0.80 Ln (X) + 1.55
55
66
159
219
80
17%
61%
52%
56%
88%
9
40
83
122
70
83%
39%
48%
44%
12%
46
26
76
97
10
GROSS TOTAL TRIPS
579
56%
324
44%
255
INTERNALIZATION OF GROUND LEVEL RETAIL
10%
Reduction of 10% of the retail trips
7
61%
4
39%
3
INTERNALIZATION OF RESTAURANT
10%
Reduction of 10% of the rest. trips
16
42°/a'.
7
58%
9
SUBTOTAL INTERNAL CAPTURE OF GROSS TRIPS
4%
Internalization as a % of Gross Trips
23
49%
11
51%
12
PEDESTRIAN AND /OR TRANSIT REDUCTION OF: EXTERNAL TRIPS
10%
Reduction of 10% of the external trips
56
31%
17
69%
39
NET EXTERNAL TRIPS
500
59 %'
296
41%
204
EXISTING DRIVE IN BANK
27,481 SQ. FT
912
T = 12.34 (X) -
339
'',56%
190
44% ''.
149
EXISTING RETAIL
2,400 SQ. FT.
820
Ln (T) = 0.60 Ln {X) + 2,29
17
61 %'....
10
- 39%
7
EXISTING RESTAURANT
1,500 SQ. FT
932
T = 11.52 (X)
17
'52 %''.
9
48%
8
GROSS TRIPS FOR EXISTING USES
356
56%
200
44%
156
NET EXTERNAL TRIPS FOR EXISTING USES
With a 20% transittpedestrian reduction
285
160
125
NET NEW EXTERNAL TRIPS (PROPOSED - EXISTING)
215
63%
136
'37%
79
LAND USE
UNITS
ITE
LUC
ITE 7TH EDITION
RATE OR FORMULA
PM
TRIPS
IN
OUT
%
TRIPS
%
TRIPS
RESIDENTIAL CONDOS/TOWNHOMES/LIVE WORK LOFTS
SPECIALTY GROUND LEVEL RETAIL
RESTAURANT
BANK WITH DRIVE IN LANES
OFFICE'
108 DU
23,558 SQ. FT
13,821 SQ. FT.
17,713 SQ. FT.
34,623 SQ. FT.
230
814
932
912
710
Ln (T) = 0.82 Ln (X) + 0.32
T = 2.40 (X) + 21.48
T= 10.92'(X)
T = 45.74 ())
T = 1.12 (X) + 78.81
64
78
151
810
118
67%
44%
61%
50%
17%
43
34
92
405
20
33%
56%
39%
'50%
' `83 %'
21
44
59
4 05
98
GROSS TOTAL TRIPS
1,221
49 %°
594
'51%
627
INTERNALIZATION OF GROUND LEVEL RETAIL
10 %.
Reduction of 10% of the retail trips
8
48%
4
'...52%
4
INTERNALIZATION OF RESTAURANT
10%
Reduction of 10% of the rest. drips
15
51%
8
'.49%
7
SUBTOTAL INTERNAL CAPTURE OF GROSS TRIPS
2%
Internalization as a % of Gross Trips
23
52%
12
48%
11
PEDESTRIAN AND /OR TRANSIT REDUCTION OF EXTERNAL TRIPS
10%
Reduction of 10% of the external trips
120
56%
67
�44%
53
NET EXTERNAL TRIPS
1,078
48%
515
52% '
563
EXISTING DRIVE IN BANK
27,481 SQ. FT.
912
T = 45.74 (X)
1,257
50%
628
50%
629
EXISTING RETAIL +
2,400 SQ. FT.
814
T = 2.40 (X) + 21.48
27
44%
12
56%
15
EXISTING RESTAURANT -
1,500 SQ. FT
932
T = 10.92,(X)
16
61%
.10',39%
6
GROSS TRIPS FOR EXISTING USES
1,284
50%
640
50%
644
NET EXTERNAL TRIPS FOR EXISTING USES
With a 20% lransiUpedestrian reduction
1,027
512
515
NET NEW EXTERNAL TRIPS (PROPOSED - EXISTING)
51
6%
113
'94%
48
Project Trip Assianment
Project traffic assignment to the surrounding study area roadways has been determined pursuant to the Miami -Dade
County Cardinal Distribution for Project Zone 1103 (see Figure 5), using the adjacent street roadway network and the
land use characteristics in the vicinity of the project site. The assignment and distribution of project traffic on the adjacent
roadway network reflects the general project distribution characteristics identified below, based upon the Miami -Dade
County cardinal distributions which are presented in Table 3A and Figure 5.
e To and from the NNE using US -1 24.13%
To and from the ENE and ESE using SW 72 Street 11.90%
• To and from the SSE and SSW using SW 57 Avenue 14,00%
® To and from the WSW using US -1 21.67%
® To and from the WNW and NNW using SW 72 Street 28.30%
Total: 100.00%
Data is provided in Table 3A below to compare the project trip assignment (by cardinal distribution) for the existing bank,
retail and restaurant uses on site, with the project trip assignment for the proposed residential mixed use project. Table
3A documents the overall small net new trip increase during the PM peak hour resulting from the proposed
redevelopment plan. Table 3B identifies the net new project traffic assignment at the first directly accessed count
stations surrounding the project site.
Table 3A — Cardinal Distribution for Zone 1103
Table 3R — Cardinal Distrihutinn Ascinnmant of Artim -pnt Cnunt Stntinnc
COUNT
STATION
NUMBER
Cardinal
1,027 PM Peak
Hour Trips
1,078 PM Peak
Hour Trips
51 PM Peak Hour
Trip Increase
Direction
Distribution
Existing Uses
Proposed Uses
Net New Trips
NNE
24.13%
248
260
12
ENE
10.42%
107
112
5
ESE
1.48%
16
16
1
SSE
0.68%
7
7
0
SSW
13.32%
137
144
7
WSW
21.67%
223
234
11
WNW
11.40%
117
123
6
NNW
16.90%
174
182
9
Total:
100.00%
1027
1078
61
Table 3R — Cardinal Distrihutinn Ascinnmant of Artim -pnt Cnunt Stntinnc
COUNT
STATION
NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
Zone 1103
Cardinal
Distribution
Existing Uses
PM Trips
Proposed Uses
PM Trips
Net New
PM Trips
1027
1078
51
0127
US -1 north of SW 57 Ave to SW 67 Ave
18.13%
186
195
9
9634
SW 57 Ave north of SW 72 Street to US -1
6.00 %°
62
65
3
9656
SW 72 St west of Cartagena Circle to NW 57 Ave
11,90%
122
128
6
9636
SW 57 Ave south of SW 88 Street
14.00%
144
151
7
9966
US -1 south of Kendall Drive to SW 104 St
21.67%
223
234
11
0070
SW 72 Street west of US -1
28.30%
291
305
14
100.00%
1,027
1,078
51
Cathy Sweetapple & Associates
February 2005
South Miami Mixed Use Traffic Impact Study
City of South Miami
Legend Figure 5
Site Location Project Traffic Assignment and Distribution
South Miami Mixed Use Development
January 2005
Source: Cathy Sweetapple & Associates
Traffic Concurrency Conditions
Using the average project distribution percentages outlined above, project traffic has been assigned to the local roadway
network surrounding the site and to the first directly accessed traffic count stations. Vehicular traffic for the project will
access the local roadway network using driveway connections to SW 57 Court, SW 73 Street, SW 58 Avenue, and SW 58
Court. The traffic will then access the regional roadway network, using SW 57 Avenue, SW 72 Street and US -1. A traffic
concurrency evaluation has been performed at each of the first directly accessed traffic count stations located on the
regional roadway network as provided in Tables 4A and 4B. Available capacity was found to be maintained at each of
the first directly accessed traffic count stations.
Traffic Conditions along Adiacent Studv Area Roadways
Existing and Year 2008 projected PM peak hour traffic conditions were evaluated on the roadway network adjacent to the
redevelopment site. Acceptable levels of service were found to be maintained after incorporating the net new project
traffic. The enclosed Tables 5A and 5B provide an evaluation of existing traffic, future background traffic and total traffic
conditions for the year 2008. Future background growth calculations are provided in the enclosed Table 6. A level of
service evaluation was performed for both the PM peak hour using the two way peak hour analysis methodology,
evaluating each roadway pursuant to the adopted levels of service in the City of South Miami Comprehensive Plan. The
peak hour maximum service volumes were obtained from the Year 2002 Quality /Level of Service Handbook published by
the Florida Department of Transportation. The evaluation of local traffic impacts has been performed for the study
roadway segments consistent with the City and County Comprehensive Plans,
Existing Traffic Conditions
AM and PM peak hour turning movement traffic data was collected at study intersections on January 13, 2005 (see
Attachment 1). Twenty four hour link counts were collected the week of January 11, 2005 and the week of January 25,
2005. All counts collected were adjusted for peak season using the Year 2003 weekly peak season adjustment factors
provided by the Florida Department of Transportation. The peak hour data was then summarized on the enclosed Table
5A (for the PM peak hour) to identify the existing peak season PM peak hour directional traffic conditions for the study
area roadway segments. Acceptable levels of service were found to exist under existing traffic conditions.
Signalized AM and PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Counts
Sunset Drive and SW 57 Avenue
Sunset Drive and SW 58 Avenue
Sunset Drive and US -1
SW 73 Street and US -1
SW 74 Street and SW 57 Avenue
72 Hour Link Counts
SW 57 Court between Sunset Drive and SW 73 Street
SW 73 Street between SW 58 Avenue and SW 57 Court
SW 58 Avenue between SW 73 Street and SW 74 Street
SW 74 Street between SW 58 Avenue and SW 58 Court
Cathy Sweetapple & Associates
February 2005
10
South Miami Mixed Use Traffic Impact Study
City of South Miami
Future Background Traffic Conditions
Future background traffic volumes through the buildout Year 2008 have been calculated for the study area roadway
segments using average historical growth rates for the state roadways within the study area. The attached Table 6
provides the historical growth rate calculations used to project the existing traffic volumes to year 2008 traffic volumes. A
growth rate of 0.50% per year will be used for any roadway demonstrating negative growth or growth below the 0.50%
threshold. The enclosed Table 513 identifies the growth in background traffic to the year 2008, and the evaluation of
future background traffic conditions for the two way peak hour timeframe. Acceptable levels of service were found to
exist through the year 2008.
Committed Development Traffic
Traffic from two adjacent committed development projects were incorporated into this traffic study. Plaza 57 is
nearing completion, and is located adjacent to Block B and SW 57 Court, between SW 73 Street and SW 74 Street. The
South Miami Office Building and Parking Structure has not yet been built, but it was approved adjacent to Block A to the
north of SW 73 Street between SW 58 Avenue and SW 58 Court. The traffic from these projects was layered on top of
future background traffic within the study area. The PM peak hour traffic from these unbuilt committed development
projects has been assigned to the study area roadways using existing traffic studies for each project (where available) or
using the general traffic distribution and assignment established for the project site. The assignment of committed
development traffic to the study roadway segments is documented in Table 513 for the PM peak hour. The location of the
committed development projects is identified on the enclosed Figure 6.
Total Traffic Conditions
An evaluation of the roadway level of service under total traffic conditions has been performed for the study roadway
segments adjacent to the project site. Total traffic conditions reflect the combined effect of future background plus
committed development traffic plus the traffic from the proposed redevelopment program. The enclosed Tables 5A and
5B demonstrate that acceptable levels of service were found to be maintained through the Year 2008.
Adjacent Study Area Intersections
Five signalized intersections along Sunset Drive, US -1 and SW 57 Avenue are being analyzed to examine AM peak hour
and PM peak hour operating conditions for the year 2008 buildout date for the project site. The study intersections
include Sunset Drive at SW 57 Avenue, Sunset Drive at SW 58 Avenue, Sunset Drive at US -1, SW 73 Street at US-1 and
SW 74 Street atSW 57 Avenue. Existing and projected turning movements for these study area intersections along with
intersection analysis worksheets and signal timing sheets from Miami -Dade County will be provided under separate
cover. The intersection analyses will determine the extent to which signal timing modifications will be needed to maintain
acceptable operating levels of service.
Conclusions
Given the analyses performed in this Traffic Impact Study, all study area roadways adjacent to the project site were
found to operate at acceptable levels of service (during the two way PM peak hour timeframe) through the buildout of the
project site: Acceptable levels of service were found to be maintained through the Year 2008.
Cathy Sweetapple & Associates
February 2005
South Miami Mixed Use Traffic Impact Study
City of South Miami
v
c
c
N
a m m
°-� D TIT D� y°
7
N (n
O
A
N�aD fn W
0 C C2
00000 _.
6>OD? WOO �
omo°�ctooccn
W CO co (n
W N D
� C3 Oi00
c ns
C _a
o a o s S CD
!o � o
O w
17.E
O �;z
m
V F W co s� m d
'V W NNO>N°D �.' .O or
s
NNCn V O y
CJf A O m . Oi O
� N K
rn 3
<G ONrn N A Ot .
to oo .p 2
is K
1mm mmr- � K
P+ Cn mmcn 0'0
C) 0 88 (A79
CL
-n
O n W w 0 0 00
Cl)�
m
C1'
0
O
3
C
m
0
K
m
n
d
O a
N �p
NA
00
N
O
0
0
0
3
c
3
N
n
n
0
0
a
c
7
K
0
C1
'a
C�1
K
D
m
N
N
O
X
w W
C
(O <D
Qa
0
O
3
3
N
CL
v
N
O'
a
-i
n
0
O
C
_a
O
7
N
O
O
oMmol
co
m
Cp
rn
cp
rn
cp
rn
o
—p.
z CO)
C
� D
�z
N
V
N
V
W¢
p
*G
C
cp
o
m
g
cn
v
m
co
G
N
Z
N
C
<
z
V
�
C
b
a
o
x
ar
p�j
rn
V
a
m
0
a m m
°-� D TIT D� y°
7
N (n
O
A
N�aD fn W
0 C C2
00000 _.
6>OD? WOO �
omo°�ctooccn
W CO co (n
W N D
� C3 Oi00
c ns
C _a
o a o s S CD
!o � o
O w
17.E
O �;z
m
V F W co s� m d
'V W NNO>N°D �.' .O or
s
NNCn V O y
CJf A O m . Oi O
� N K
rn 3
<G ONrn N A Ot .
to oo .p 2
is K
1mm mmr- � K
P+ Cn mmcn 0'0
C) 0 88 (A79
CL
-n
O n W w 0 0 00
Cl)�
m
C1'
0
O
3
C
m
0
K
m
n
d
O a
N �p
NA
00
N
O
0
0
0
3
c
3
N
n
n
0
0
a
c
7
K
0
C1
'a
C�1
K
D
m
N
N
O
X
w W
C
(O <D
Qa
0
O
3
3
N
CL
v
N
O'
a
-i
n
0
O
C
_a
O
7
N
Table 5A
Existing Traffic Conditions on Study Area Roadways - Two -Way PM Peak Hour
-- -.- - -r -- - -- --- - - - -- -r -•' •••"- ""° "� • �av4•�ay.. -vv ..u..uvvvt` atty utG Vtty Vl VVUItI tYng1111 VV11jP1z11CI1w VC ilgll.
Pursuant to the City of South Miami Comprehensive Plan, the capacity for US -1 is 150% of LOS D.
2005
2005
2005
TWO -WAY
TWO -WAY
TWO -WAY
PM PEAK
ROADWAY SEGMENTS
EXISTING
COUNT
COUNT
FDOT
ADOPTED
PM PEAK HR
PM PEAK HR
PM PEAK HR
HOUR
LANES
STATION
DATE
PSCF
LOS
VOLUME
PK SEASON
CAPACITY
LOS
V/C
SW 57 Avenue
US -1 to Sunset Drive
4LD
By City
1/13/2005
1.02
F
1,432
1,461
3,270
C
0.44
Sunset Drive to SW 73 Street
4LD
By City
1/13/2005
1.02
F
1,457
1,486
3,270
C
o.45.,
SW 73 Street to SW 74 Street
41-13
By city
1113/2005
1.02
F
1,291
1,317
3,270
C
0.39
SW 57 Court
Sunset Drive to SW 73 Street
2LU
By city
1/27/2005
1.01
D
179
181
950
C
0.19
SW 73rd Street to SW 74 Street
21-111
By city
1/2712005
1.01
D
179
181
950
C
0.19
SW 58 Avenue
t1S -1 to Sunset Drive
21-1-1
By City
1/13/2005
1.02
D
506
516
950
D
0.54
Sunset Drive to SW 73 Street
2LU
By city
1/13/2005
1.02
D
275
281
950
C
0.30
SW 73 Street to SW 74 Street
21-1.1
By city
1/13/2005
1.02
D
2,616
281
950
C
0.30
SW 58 Court
Sunset Drive to SW 73 Street
2LU
By city
1/27/2005
1.01
D
2s2
285
950
C
0.30
SW 73rd Street to SW 74 Street
2LU
By city
1127/2005
1.01
D
282
285
950
C
0.30
Sunset Drive
SW 57 Avenue to SW 57 Court
21-D
By city
1/13/2005
1.02
F
1,246
1,271
1,543
D
0.82 i
SW 57 Court of SW 58 Avenue
21-13
By city
1/1312005
1.02
F
1,158
1,181
1,543
C
0.77
SW 58 Avenue to SW 58 Court
2LD
By city
1/13/2005
1.02
F
1,073
1,094
1,543
C
0.71
SW 58 Court to US -1
2LD
By City
1/13/2005
1.02
F
1,113
1,135
1,543
C
0.74
SW 73 Street
SW' 57 Avenue to SW 57 Court
21-11
By city
1/13/2005
1.02
D
432
441
950
C
0.46
SW 57 Court to SW 58 Avenue
21-1.1
By City
1/1312005
1.02
D
.432
441
950
C
0:46
SW 58 Avenue to SW 58 Court
21-1-1
By City
1/13/2005
1.02
D
529
540
950
D
0.57
SW 58 Court to LIS -1
21-1.1
By City
1/13/2005
1.02
D
529
540
950
D
0.57
SW 74 Street
SW 57 Avenue to SW 57 Court
21-1.1
By city
1/13/2005
1.02
D
266
271
950
C
0.29
SW 57 Court to SW 58 Avenue
2LU
By City
1/13/2005
1.02
D
413
421
950
C
0:44
SW 58 Avenue to SW 58 Court
2LU
By city
1113/2005
1.02
D
413
421
950
C
0'44
US -1
SW 57 Avenue to SW 72 Street
6LD
By city
1/1372005
1.02
F
5,112
5,214
7,020
E
0.73
SW 72 Street to SW 73 Street
kl..i..... l...- ..:.tat.... _ -_ �_--_ -_. . ... . ........ �.�..�.
6LD
.. ...
By city
.. ��
1/13/2005
1.02
F
5,107
5,209
7,020
E
0.73
-- -.- - -r -- - -- --- - - - -- -r -•' •••"- ""° "� • �av4•�ay.. -vv ..u..uvvvt` atty utG Vtty Vl VVUItI tYng1111 VV11jP1z11CI1w VC ilgll.
Pursuant to the City of South Miami Comprehensive Plan, the capacity for US -1 is 150% of LOS D.
CD m
D N C
� p N
SV O 3.
3 G o
0
03 (D
CD r7
� o
3 CD
ID Q o
DO C_
3 m
3 Q
C N
m y. 3
Q 5 •�
(o
CD v D
0 0 °
C3CD
� fn
a m i
0 0 0
CD — N 1
� b. p
V j
-
' N I
3 ID w 1
j
c
W O' t
C
Cn f
tS
(D m t
W -, f
o s
o
O
0-
cn -
v(
Z woC
0000
w(Awwo
(AwwwN
0 Cl) (A
wwCN
w(AN
wwCN
-- V 0 '�
CA CM Ol V
-07 01 07 Cn V
Cn 00 Ch N
V 0 (A
V N
V tl
V o s n
N V
C
G
w
O
W 0 C1D
W ,O„ V
W a 0
C¢
<0 <M
t 0>co,
1�: C0
2L 0
CnpCD
2L C) 0
CAOC) D
X
FD CD
( C
D
CD a =
C C
=
C C
CD a _
< C
< D
C
D
F_
C
0 fD
CD O O
O O O O
O O O"� (p
.O+• O
D O .0.. CD
.0.. O
0 0— ID 0
u Cn 0
O CCn o
C O cn 6
C O (A O
E CA
C, co 0
E fA
U) (A 0
'D * CA
fA < U3
Cn (n
fn CA !n
(A
G
(A
<
C
CD
i (AN
oV'oDv
o�DDy
a�"oD.c"i
Vp(.n
f/�cn
Vp(w
CA�
3
m Cl)
0m 0
00 0
0m 0
com
� m
(Am
� m
m
O O O
O O O
0 7 0
CD
fD
N
(D
z
CD
P, (D
CD'
a- CD ;:L
.-r
M
,O„
7
,1
.-I .�
(�
D
J
7
J
n
m
X
-4 0) 0)
NNN
NNNN
NNNN
NN
NNN
NN.
-AAA
Z�
� rr
00
rrr
CCC
rrrr
CCCC
rrrr
0000
rr
cc
-rrr
CCC
rr
CC
rrr
000
yZ
r
�
;KOW
NV
„ A ?
co C
w�
mrn
D.D�
�Da
°
�
tilcn
0)
7C Cr
O
r
z M G
L al
01 W
A A N
AAOD
01 C11A A
V V CAW
-
N NW
W W
OO
N N C11
OCOA
(D CD
W01 CJ7
ni 171 �O
O-'
VN
Cnw V
OOCA 0)
OtnAA
OVOA.
V V CA
�s
CO -4
N A
D D o
y07iD CD
'
p
z A
o
C
W W
r OD Pi
J
C1DNN
W N N N
OD -* W W
W Cn N N
003s
N'.(n
W W Cl)
N N
3 e1 .c.
m
00
o v_
Cl)
A
->•—
0 W.W
ANNN
N) 4b, A
C11 C31 r%)
W co N N
NCD
N w
WWW
A A A
NN
a Ic
1 .Ni
O V
j
W W
NNE
W00 ..a
-iN
i(b
->• _ _
W
..a .a
W-ti
v�d)
O
N y
Vl
W W
O O O
O O
V V O O'
O O O 0
v 00
WOD
W W W
O O
0 00 0
M m
A c(D
0
rr
7
d
3
v z
3
�°•
�O
en AA
�, 0D V V
0) 0)
CA ,p
O CO CO
-40)
AWCA)
,n, m
(D
a.
1 �
N
�
m
AA_w
OD V
W CA 01 CA
O N N
� N'N W
CA j
v J N
A
A 01 01
-0 0' O C
co 00
-4 V AO
OCOOO
OoA0CD W
O0
NN..a
A
NCO CD
p, D DOo
O CD
-nC r
_V V
C� CD
c»
vl "<n CT 2n
0 CO
co (D (D
(Do
W W CJ
D
'0 O
NN
O O
C0}7 00i 0071
CD 00
Con 0.011 (oil COn
0000
AAAA.
0101.
0 0
010 W
0 0 0
0(n
0 0
NNN
0 0 0.
y, D
~2
W w w W
X
A
a�
mm
000
0000
0000
00
000
0o
000
N
COCm
�a
00
000
0000
0000
oio
000
00
000
C
W
AACo'
V V AO
Z-4 J co
A J
V N
W W
OO
W W.lii
OOA
:(Oc0
(O 014
°n
c
c
m
m
O.
O
m
C)
O
3
Q
O
0
fA
_l;
S
M
o n �
a
�W
c
O.
CD
d
X
O
C
9
F
0
CD
m
2
O
c
Table 6
Historical Traffic Growth Rate Calculations for the Study Area
ROADWAY
DIR
COUNT
STATION
AADT
2000
AADT
2001
AADT
2002
AADT
2003
COMPOUND
GROWTH
2000-2003
SW 57 AVENUE
N. OF US -1
N/S
FDOT -0034
23,500
19,400
22,500
22,000
-2.17%
TOTAL FOR ALL STATIONS:
23,500
19,400
22,500
22,000
-2.17%
SOUTH DIXIE HWY /US -1
NE. OF SW 57 AVENUE
E/W
FDOT -0127
81,500
87,500
84,000
89,000
2.98%
TOTAL FOR ALL STATIONS:
81,500
87,500
84,000
89,000
2.98%
SW 72 STREET
W. OF US -1
E!W
FDOT` -0070
29,500
36,000
33,000
27,000
- 2.91%
TOTAL FOR ALL STATIONS:
29,500
36,000
33,000
27,000
-2.91%
REGIONAL GROWTH RATE:
1
105,0001
106,9001
106,500
111,000
1.87%
Legend
Figure 6
Site Location Block Location Approved Committed Development Adjacent to the Project Site
Committed Project South Miami Mixed Use Development
January 2005
Source: Cathy Sweetapple & Associates
CATHY SWEETAPPLE & ASSOCIATES
TRANSPORTATION AND MOBILITY PLANNING
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date: February 8, 2005
To: Mr. Don O'Donniley
Director of Planning and Zoning
City of South Miami
6130 Sunset Drive
South Miami, Florida 33143
From: Cathy Sweetapple, AICP
Regarding: South Miami Mixed Use Development
Traffic Impact Study
Please find enclosed the following material related to the South Miami Mixed Use Development Traffic
Impact Study.
Revised Table 5A — Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions for Study Roadways
Revised Table 5B - Future Background and Total Traffic Conditions for the PM Peak Hour
• Corrections have been made to Tables 5A and 5B to add clarity on the adopted LOS Standards for Red
Road, Sunset Drive and US -1.
• The lane geometry has been corrected for Red Road for the segment between Sunset Drive and SW 74
Street.
• The numerical capacity designations for Red Road and US -1 have been recalculated using the Group
IV signals per mile capacity designation based upon the FDOT tables.
New Table 5C — Existing AM peak Hour Traffic Conditions for Study Roadways
New Table 5D — Future Background and Total Traffic Conditions for the AM Peak Hour
• The AM roadway analysis has been completed.
New Tables 8A and 8B — AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movements for the 5 Study Intersections
New Tables 8C and 8D - PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movements for the 5 Study Intersections
New Table 9 AM and PM Peak Hour Study Intersection LOS Summary (see below)
Attachment III — Intersection Analysis Worksheets for Existing 2005 and Future 2008
Tahip 9 - AM and PM Ppak I4nnr Sihnrly Infarcaefinn I t1C
Signalized Study Intersections
AM Peak Hour
Existing LOS
AM Peak Hour
2008 Total Traffic LOS
PM Peak Hour
Existing LOS
PM Peak Hour
2008 Total Traffic LOS
Sunset Drive and SW 57 Avenue
D
D
D
D
Sunset Drive and SW 58 Avenue
B
C
D
D
Sunset Drive and US -1
C
D
D
E 1
SW 73 Street and US -1
B
B
B
B
SW 74 Street and SW 57 Avenue
C
C
C
C
L,? VL... 0.0 iau.o vi v, w1iwi1 1b nvt t;au:waLeu uy the intersection anarysis sorlware. i ne sevei or aeiay is
slightly above D, thus falling within the range that would be considered within 150% of D.
Acceptable levels of service have been documented at the study area intersections. Signal timing
modifications were needed at the intersection of Sunset Drive and SW 58th Avenue, taking 10 seconds of
east -west green and adding it to the north -south movement to respond to future development patterns in the
study area.
101 North Gordon Road, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301
954 -463 -8878 office 954 - 525 -4303 fax 954 -649 -8942 cell Email: csweet @bellsouth.net
Table 5A
Existing Traffic Conditions on Study Area Roadways - Two -Way PM Peak Hour
n-0- -F- 00 QI V U00- UPU11 Intl ZUUG rUU I VUMLY /LVJ n21HUDUOK am Ine Viry oT JUUTn ivllaml uomprenenslve vian.
Pursuant to the City of South Miami Comprehensive Plan, the capacity for US -1 is 150% of LOS R
2005
2005
2005
TWO -WAY
TWO -WAY
TWO -WAY
PM PEAK
ROADWAY SEGMENTS
EXISTING
COUNT
COUNT
FOOT
ADOPTED
PM PEAK HR
PM PEAK HR
PM PEAK HR
HOUR
LANES
STATION
DATE
PSCF
LOS
VOLUME
PKSEASON
CAPACITY
LOS
YlC
SW 57 Avenue
US -1 to Sunset Drive -
4LD
By City
1/1372005
1.02
F
1,432
1,461
3270 at E
C
0.45
Sunset Drive to SW 73 Street
2LD
By City
1/13/2005
1.02
F
1,457
1,486
1543 at E
E
0.96
SW 73 Street to SW 74 Street
2LD
By city
1/13/2005
1.02
F
1,291
1,317
1543 at E
E
0.85
SW 57 Court
Sunset Drive to SW 73 Street
21-1.1
By city
1/27/2005
1.01
D
179
181
950
C
SW 73rd Street to SW 74 Street
2LU
By city
1127/2005
1.01
D
179
181
950
C
0.19
SW-58 avenue
US-1 to Sunset Drive
2LU
By City
1/13/20.06
1.02
D
506
516
950
D
0.54
Sunset Drive to SW 73 Street
2LU
By City
1/13/2005
1.02
D
275
281
950
C
0.30
SW 73 Street to SW 74 Street
2LU
By City
1/13/2005
1.02
D
275
281
950
C
0.30 `
SW 58 Court
Sunset Drive to SW 73 Street
21-1.1
By city
1/27/2005
1.01
D
282
285
950
C
0.30
SW 73rd Street to SW 74 Street
2LU
By city
1/27/2005
1.01
D
282
285
950
C
0.30
Sunset Drive
SW 57 Avenue to SW 57 Court
2LD
By City
/13/2005
1.02
F
1,246
1,271
1543 at E
D
0.82
SW 57 Court of SW 58 Avenue
2LD
By city
1/13/2005
1.02
F
1,158
1,181
1543 at E
C
0.77
SW 58 Avenue to SW 58 Court
2LD
By city
1713/2005
1.02
F
1,073
1,094
1543 at E
C
0.71
SW 58 Court to US -1
2LD
By City
1113/2005
1.02
F
1,113
1,135
1543atE
C
0.74
SW 73 Street
SW 57 Avenue to SW 57 Court
2LU
By city
1/13/2005
1.02
D
432
441
950
C
0.46
SW 57 Court to SW 58 Avenue
2LU
By city
1/13/2005
1.02
D
432
441
950
C
0.46
SW 58 Avenue to SW 58 Court
2LU
By City
1113/2005
1.02
D
529
540
950
D
0.57 ,
SW 58 Court to US -1
21-1-1
By City
1713/2005
1.02
D
529
540
950
D
0.57
SW 74 Street
SW 57 Avenue to SW 57 Court
21-1.1
By city
1/13/2005
1.02
D
266
271
950
C
0`29
SW 57 Court to SW 58 Avenue
21-1.1
By city
1/13/2005
1.02
D
413
421
950
C
0'44
SW 58 Avenue to SW 58 Court
2LU
By City
1/13/2005
1.02
D
413
421
950
C
0`44
US -1
Northeast of SW 57 Avenue
6LD
FDOT -0127
1/29/2005
1.01
150% of D
5,740
5,797
6360 at 150%
D
0`.91
SW 57 Avenue to SW 72 Street
6LD
By city
1/13/2005
1.02
150% of D
5,112
5,214
6360 at 150%
D
0:82
SW 72 Street to SW 73 Street
6LD
By city
1/13/2005
1.02
150% of D
5,107
5,209
6360 at 150%
D
0.82
n-0- -F- 00 QI V U00- UPU11 Intl ZUUG rUU I VUMLY /LVJ n21HUDUOK am Ine Viry oT JUUTn ivllaml uomprenenslve vian.
Pursuant to the City of South Miami Comprehensive Plan, the capacity for US -1 is 150% of LOS R
CO m c
CD M) N
D N c
O m
O �.
3 < o
3 0
3 m
m n
O 0 `r
o
o
o m c
3
3 a 3
x c to
W N.
Q 7
(z m O
N D) O
to 3
oaID
3 D m
D7 N
I '
O, R
CD a N
OR m
O ° N
D) A
7 d
D
d tD.
'D O
CD
m cn
N � 1
• N 1
Z O
N \°
0!
(D C
rn �
w �
m
7
Q
;(1
a
°m
CL
N
N
O
CD
N
O
'm
m
O
0
CD
0
m
m
f
c
z chcCnn z
cCCowCwC0C
(wC wCCCCnfoCmc
(nfnfwCwo
wow
wwcpf
(n CD ltD
(Cn Cl) cfcn
(i�
V m 3
CA CA CA J
CA (A CA CA V
CA CA CT CA w
V Co CA
V Cn '� CA
CA
N V co .
CO V V A
OD (A V V W
OD W V V N
W a OD
ago
W. a •+• OD
W r0„ V
W 'D •+• V
n cnD�
<
DC) : W
<
07 -0DcA
0>0
�O�a
FL C) 0
cnG
u N CD
O< ;�
CD C CD
O G O G
C CD CD
O< O G
CD
-+, O_
O C<
�_ M. O_
C<
Q
O
CD O -i.
to
7 7 W
C CD
.Z O O CD
C(D C
7. O O<
N
f„D' (D O 7
ID
CCD N O 3
D
n 0 0
O O CD
0 CD o CD M
O O 5L O CD
O
O .0+. N
a p
p. p a
v
C<
D cnov)
Er (n
cocno
Como
oco
(n0
�*
g�( c� n
CSp(�n� 0
u gu) V
(n *cn
cp ar (n
cp cn *cn
*
(n
'D
CC
C
CA Cc
'C
�*cn
O
D W
co
o
OD
ov
o
,
m
MN
a0D-
00 -4
mD-4
4.
V
,p
�(n
�a
CD
cam 0
nm 0
09 o
cnm
m
(,nm
m'
3
CD
"
.+
O
..
fD
Z
D CO,,,D
� N P.
� CD
N �
N
,gym
N
-1
D
N
0
n
i
m
X
CAOCA
N'NN
N NNN'
NNNN
NN
NNN
NN
NNA'
zC-*"
rrr
000
r- r,
cc_c
rrrr
cccc
rrrr
0000
rr
cc
rrr
ccc
rr
C: C:
rrr
00p
u
NZ
C_CAwCi1
NNto
A A'�°p
'OWN
NN
NNCA
�_
�W6ADD
N
QG.
i co A V
OO.
CWT�A��
CACOA
V O) -.
D
A D N
a
O.
j
Z
CA CA.�
'a
L.
C N
.p A N
A AOD
CA Ot V
cm CA A.4
V V 00
OO CA CA.
.�
Id •..'.N W
O CAAA
Ww
OO
��
NNCn
COCOA
CO C'O
W CA -N
WOOD
cc N
OO
V NCO
OVCOA
V V(A
VCow
R m
N a
O
�.
Z M�
i
Q C
O
Ci
CA) W W
`r
_ _
-�.
W NNN
CA CmNN
NCA
co WW
NN
co NN
tbN N
OD> W W
C) CD -+
-+0
NNN
m
C m
a )o $
A O
o o
W w
--'� _
A NNN
N A A
mCANN
W w N N
NCA
N W
W co co
A A A
mN
A N
W
a n d
v. 3 m
.S W u
CL re°
.1 CD W
O V
.+ .1 W W
OD CD s
to
00
OD O CDD
W ..a
V CA CA
� w
'
-04, W C''�
C,
00O
0°
d1 CA 00
o 000
WCJ co (D
0000
CAW
co W
OCO...
00
0.00
n �`.
C„
o ao
o 0
\0 00
0000
00
0 0
W
0 0\
\o
OQZip, .
°
m c_A.
^ o ^
�
3
7
LT
_
3
o z
0 CO
CA A 4
s (A V V
,p A O 0
CA
CO CO CO
V CA
4 W W
� ,4. �
C
,p
�
'06
q 3
V AO�
O
—
00
- 1
V W?
C0.0CD
CA? co W
0to
NNN
CA—
0)LO
0) 63 OD
O ROOD
A j
(D CD- Cl)
co w 10
O O O
co
N N U1 Cn
(P N N
D m
m D) m
CO 0
CA CA (A
co CO [fl CO
CA CA CA CA
W W W W
0 CO
co (O CO
CO CO
d> ? V
W W O
'D n
000
0000
Rl a M a
CA (A
00
CA' CA CA
000
CA CA
00
ao° a
m m m m
m m m
j
-o
rx�N
000
000
0000
0000
00
000
00
mmo
(0i�0m(,o°,
Ma
000
oD oD io
000
(A (n w
0000
N it iA
0000
ao
oc
000
00
000
ClD Cb OD
-+ O W
0)
Q CA CA Cn:
co co co
CA W A 0
is :D.
-44
is is hD
. to m
IV K)
CA CA
w co b.
' CO O;
c
m
sv
0
CL
O
CD
n
3
Q.
7
In
N.
M
K a.
3 (D
G Co
CL
C
a
d
O
Q
m
CD
CD
Ct
pr
S
0
Table 5C
Existing Traffic Conditions on Study Area Roadways - Two -Way AM Peak Hour
Notes: Capacities are based upon the 2002 FOOT Quality /LOS Handbook and the City of South Miami Comprehensive Plan.
Pursuant to the City of South Miami Comprehensive Plan, the capacity for US -1 is 150% of LOS D.
2005
2005
2005
TWO -WAY
TWO -WAY
TWO -WAY
AM PEAK
ROADWAY SEGMENTS
EXISTING
COUNT
COUNT
FDOT
ADOPTED
AM PEAK HR
AM PEAK HR
AM PEAK HR
HOUR
LANES
STATION
DATE
PSCF
LOS
VOLUME
PK SEASON
CAPACITY
LOS
VIC
SW 57 Avenue
US -1 to Sunset Drive
4LD
By City
1/13/2005
1.02
F
1,184
1,208
3270 at E
D
0.37
Sunset Drive to SW 73 Street
21-D
By city
1113/2005
1.02
F
1,359
1,386
1543 at E
E
0.90
SW 73 Street to SW 74 Street
2LD
By City
1/13 /2005
1.02
F
1,414
1,442
1543 at E
E
0.93
SW 57 Court
Sunset Drive to SW 73 Street
21-1.1
By City
1/27/2005
1.01
D
60
61
950
C
0.06
SW 73rd Street to SW 74 Street
2LU
By city
1/27/2005
1.01
D
60
61
950
C
0.06
SW 58 Avenue
US -1 to Sunset Drive
21-1.1
By City
1/13/2005
1.02
D
317
323
950
C
0.34
Sunset Drive to SW 73 Street
2LU
By City
1/13/2005
1.02
D
201
205
950
C
022 `
SW 73 Street to SW 74 Street
21-1.1
By City
1/13/2005
1.02
D
201
205
950
C
0.22
SW 58 Court
Sunset Drive to SW 73 Street
2LU
By City
1/27/2005
1.01
D
178
180
950
C
0.19
SW 73rd Street to SW 74 Street
21-1-11
By city
1/27/2005
1.01
D
178
180
950
C
0.19
Sunset Drive
SW 57 Avenue to SW 57 Court
2LD
By City
1/13/2005
1.02
F
1,029
1,050
1543 at E
C
0.68
SW 57 Court of SW 58 Avenue
2LD
By city
1/13/2005
1.02
F
1,017
1,037
1543 at E
C
0.67
SW 58 Avenue to SW 58 Court
2LD
By City
1/13/2005
1.02
F
995
1,015
1543 at E
C
0.66
SW 58 Court to US -1
2LD
By City
1/1312005
1.02
F
883
901
1543 at E
C
0.58
SW 73 Street
SW 57 Avenue to SW 57 Court
2LU
By City
1/13/2005
1.02
D
340
347
950
C
0.37
SW 57 Court to SW 58 Avenue
2LU
By.City
1/13/2005
1.02
D
340
347
-950
C
0.37
SW 58 Avenue to SW 58 Court
2LU
BY City
1/13/2005
1.02
D `
229
234
950
C
0.25
SW 58 Court to US -1
2LU
By City
1/13/2005
1.02
D
229
234
950
C
0.25
SW 74 Street
SW 57 Avenue to SW 57 Court
21-U
By city
1/13/2005
1.02
D
196
200
950
C
0.21
SW 57 Court to SW 58 Avenue
2LU
By city
1/13/2005
1.02
D
287
293
950
C
0.31
SW 58 Avenue to SW 58 Court
2LU
By City
1/13/2005
1.02
D
287
293
950'
C
0.31
US -1
Northeast of SW 57 Avenue
61-D
FDOT -0127
1/2912005
1.01
150% of D
5,740
5,797
6360 at 150%
D
0.91
SW 57 Avenue to SW 72 Street
6LD
By City
1/1312005
1.02
150% of D
4,462
4,551
6360 at 150%
D
0.72
SW 72 Street to SW 73 Street
6LD
By city
1/13/2005
1.02
150% of D
4,448
4,537
5360 at 150%
D
0.71
Notes: Capacities are based upon the 2002 FOOT Quality /LOS Handbook and the City of South Miami Comprehensive Plan.
Pursuant to the City of South Miami Comprehensive Plan, the capacity for US -1 is 150% of LOS D.
Z
0
N
m m c 00 v
(D d
DNmC_.
x °
S CO 0
< O m
7 G = W
3 n m
ON 4 Q
0 0
m o 0 n. 0 0
o
3
3 m
o-9n
c 0 c
o ti
to
m
v o 0 C C
f0 3 C
-0 CD
3 c
'0 m N, 14
(D °-"emu
C)
J- N
c 7 7
O N
o
a x
5. (D 0.
,D
N D (
m y C.
� N o
w >a
� C
O
CD 0'7
m 0—
r m
m O 3
00
N �
Q Dl
CD
CL
0
CD
a
x
°m
Cl
m
'm
0
m
N
CD
3
m
fD
-00 -
O
0
m
v
a
Q
fCANZC
fnfCc�fCCnNc
(CCnN{(CCnCCCnNC
lCCA(CCAwCwCo
CcD(nNC
fccn(nc0
Co
CA(nN
OW) (ncGO
7 fn�
J (A 3 'j
0 (n Cn V
Cn (n Cn (n V
Cn 0 U (n y
J Jam.
-40 (A
waOD
C7
J y i N
W W
J y Cn
WM-4
J ?b > Cn
W,y.,.0 J
NJCD
co>10
OD -4 -4 44b
><0)D:0
OD Cb JJW
0D0 - A
00 00
nN Yo 0D
&00
(gip
QOn
CO
o
CD CD
N
c c
C CD
X 00
< c
C
N< 3 tD
0
< C
< tD
D
C
C C .n
c c ..
C C CD
p CD ;'&
�•. fD y
(a
O
CD CD y 7
0 w e
c
0 CD C
(D p (D
- p CD p CD
p
p CD CD
:� 0
p 0 0
.�.•
CCn
p A
C
(n0 0
O (CCn O
c O (n0
co (n0
p U)
(<n(Cn0
p
�Co 0
(Cn J
(n <(n
�(n <(n
�a) co
NC
<C.�
(nC
C�N
(f).
> o
> O-
C
W
M
yC 3
wN
CIDDJ
0DDJ
w J
p
(
4pW
(�
(n om
m m �
m m �
m m �
cf)
.�.W
(o
(n m'
m
m
m
o00
a.
0�0
000
�com
�m
�m
Z
. �
m a
a CD a
m ;
(D
CO)
m
TOW
rrr
N N N
rrr
N N N N
rrrr
N N N N
rrrr
N N
rr
N N N
rrr
N N
rr
N N .p
rrr
D y
z�
ppp
ccc
cccc
0000
cc
ccc
cc
000
yZ
G)
» >
is
CnCnJ
CND(NDO
w W ??
C3 (D
WO
_
OD OD
ONOON
�a)
?0 O
y m
Vav
W'WO
?AJJ
OO
CAW
OW
Z p-�C
»
» >.
Nm'39O
?AO)
400 N
OO �
- A A co 0
CO)iN
�.>
OO
NNW
vJN
OP•N
0) ON
CD CD
O -�Co
CO [D>
JJJJ.
NWJO
?J(A
y OOD
Z
_
o O c
NNN
J NN
N co co
N
J AO CA
W W»
Cn Cn Cn Cn
>W
?Cn
NNN
NNN
CAo
co J
A.3 3
tD
d
CL t 3
o o
W N N
>
W N N
.P ?
?
N N N
N
Co 0
CO -4 -4
W OC) 0
G) fl)
w
JJJ
O
(D N
am -4
>ap W
O�v
PD PD
j N
DD
> >
WOD W
> >
W>
."��
� 7.
p
it
C) C)
o)b)oo
wwmifl
0)w
-40
W W
oio
O O
oo °o °o
J W co
O c
J J O O
0 0 0 C.
W
0 !Z
e D c
°
' o
3
D Z
3
A W W
N
?NNN
(A (ANN
N0)
co C13 W
NN
> >
M Z
C1
J (D CD
N Cn Cn
J Cn Cb OD
-+ CA W
CA -+
Co Co Co
co O
Cn W W
Cni £
MC
a D
(o
m 3
A ()
»_ -
-
0
co
co W N
W W ??
W? 00
(2
N G.)
V
W W?
0)0)>
N
(DDto
O
N3 CD
ODD ?CA
N CA OD OD
(0
CO
Ui
r
n
0
O O O
n:
to w Co
Co Co (0 Co
A A =-P 4y
W w W W
Co Co
Cn Cn
Co Co Co
Cn Cn (n
Co (D
Cn Cn
V
C,
W co O
D
Cn Cn 0
OO O
m Cn Cn Cn
0 0 0 a
M
00
000
O O
N„
C
n=
0
i
m m m m
.yi
m m m
�z>
a
rx3N
000
000
0000
0000
nn
000
00
mmo
ycmm
D
A
000'
o00
0000
0000'
00
000
00
000
<
-4-14 to
W co N
W W A A
-4-4-4 -4
W
? W A
Co (D W
n
J -1 OD
OD(3)0
JNn(n
(o Cnm
0)CA
-.N(n
Ww
JW:CO
c
N
7
Q
O
m
Q
O
7
C2
a
O
7
SN
CD
rt
'o
CD
$' a
A
O
O
C.
9
pr
w
'C7
p
D
c
TABLE 8A
SOUTH MIAMI MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT
INTERSECTION ANALYSES
EXISTING AND PROJECTED TURNING MOVEMENTS - AM PEAK HOUR
08- Feb-05
AM
PEAK HOUR
PEAK
2008
2008
2008
NET NEW
2005
.PEAK
SEASON
BKGD
COMM.
B+C
EXTERNAL
2008
VOLUMES
SEASON
.2005
VOLUMES
VOLUMES
VOLUMES -.
PROJECT
TOTAL
No.
INTERSECTION
MVNT
01/13/2005
FACTOR
VOLUMES
[11
121
TRAFFIC
VOLUMES
1
Sunset Drive
NB
and SW 57 Ave
LEFT
80
1.02
82
87
0
87
0
87
-
THRU
523
1.02
$33
563
- 4
567
5
572
.RIGHT
219
1.02.
223
236 -
0
236
0
236
SB
LEFT
103
1.02
105
111
0
111
0
119
THRU
312
1.02
318
336
13
349
8
357
RIGHT
91
1.02
93
98
0
98
0
98
EB
LEFT
93
1.0295
100
0
100
0
100
THRU
361
1.02
368.
389
7
396.
9
405
RIGHT
60
1.02
61
64
0
64
0
64
WB
LEFT
165
1.02
168
178
0 -
178
0
178
THRU
344
1.02
351
371
26
397
18
413
RIGHT
62
1.02
63
67
0
67
0
-67
PEAK
2008
2008
2008
NETNEW
2005
PEAK
SEASON
BKGD
COMM.
B+C
EXTERNAL
2008
VOLUMES
SEASON
2005
VOLUMES
VOLUMES
VOLUMES
PROJECT
.TOTAL
No.
INTERSECTION
MVNT
01/1312005
FACTOR
VOLUMES
Ill
[21
TRAFFIC
VOLUMES
2
Sunset Drive
NIS
and SW 58 Ave
LEFT
20
1.02
20
21
17
38
22
60
THRU
52
1.02
53
56
11
67
14
81
RIGHT
48
1.02
49
52
3
55
4
59
SB
LEFT
21
1.02
21
22
0
22
0
22
THRU
12
1.02
12
13
40
53
25
78
RIGHT
90
1.02
10
11
0
11
0
- 11
EB
LEFT
127
1.02
-130
137
0
137
0
137
THRU
456
1.02
465
492
0
492
0
492
RIGHT
27
1.02
28
30
31
61
38
99
WB
LEFT
42
1.02
43
45
13
58
8
66
THRU
355
1.02
362
383
0
383
0
383
RIGHT
95
1.02
97
103
0
103
0
103
PEAK
2008
2008
2008
NET NEW
2005
PEAK
SEASON
BKGD
COMM.
B +C
EXTERNAL
2008
VOLUMES
SEASON
.2005
VOLUMES
VOLUMES
VOLUMES
PROJECT
TOTAL
No.
INTERSECTION
MVNT
01 /1 3120 0 5
FACTOR
VOLUMES
1 1
[21
TRAFFIC
VOLUMES'
3
Sunset Drive
NB
and US-1
LEFT
47
1.02
48
51
0
51
0
51
THRU
2998
1.02
3058
3233
0
3233
0
3233
RIGHT
47
1.02
48
51
0
51
0.
51
SB
LEFT
19
1.02
19
20
0
20
0
20
THRU
1302
1.02
1328
1404
0
1404
0
1404
RIGHT
138
1.02
141
149
0
149
0
149
EB
THRU
574
1.02
585
618
62
680
38.
718
RIGHT
-WB
17
1.02
17
18
0
18
0
18
THRU
189
1.02
1 193
204
17
221
22
243
RIGHT.
4
1.02
4
4
0
4
0
4
BKGD= BACKGROUND
MVNT= MOVEMENT
Notes:
[1] The background growth reflects 1.87% per year as calculated in Table 6.
[2] The committed volumes have been obtained from Table 5D.
Cathy Sweetapple Associates Intersection Turning movements 2 -&05 -a
TABLE 8B
SOUTH MIAMI MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT
INTERSECTION ANALYSES
EXISTING AND PROJECTED TURNING MOVEMENTS - AM PEAK HOUR
08- Feb-05
AM
PEAK HOUR
PEAK
2008
2008
2008
NET NEW
2005
PEAK
SEASON
BKGD
COMM..
B +C
EXTERNAL
2008
VOLUMES
SEASON
2005
VOLUMES
VOLUMES
VOLUMES
PROJECT
TOTAL
No.
INTERSECTION
MVNT
01/1312005
FACTOR
VOLUMES
Ill
121 .
TRAFFIC
VOLUMES
4
SW 73 Street
NB
and US-1
THRU
3078
1.02
3140
3319
0
3319
0
3319
RIGHT
59
1.02
60
63
48
111
29
- 140
SB
LEFT
34
1.02
35
37..
0
37
0
37
THRU
1282
1.02
1308
1383
0
1383
D
1383
WB
LEFT
82
1.02
84
89
13
102
17
119
RIGHT
54
1.02
55
58
0
58
0
58
PEAK
2008
2008
2008
NET NEW
2005
PEAK
.SEASON
BKGD
COMM.
B +C
EXTERNAL
2008
-
VOLUMES
SEASON
2005
VOLUMES
VOLUMES
VOLUMES
.PROJECT
TOTAL
No.
..INTERSECTION
MVNT
01113/2005
FACTOR
VOLUMES
[1]
21
TRAFFIC
VOLUMES
5
SW 74 Street
NB
-
and SW 57 Ave
LEFT
20
1.02
20
21
15
36
9
45
THRU
788
1.02
804
850
15
865
9
874.
RIGHT
32
1.02
33
35
0
35
0
35
SB
LEFT
24
1.02
24
25
0
25
0 -
25
THRU
472
1.02
481
508
4
512
6
518
RIGHT
31
1.02
32
34
0
34
0
34
EB
LEFT
74
1.02
75
79
0
79
0
79
THRU
26
1.02
27
29
0
29
0
29
RIGHT
24
1.02
24
25
4
29
6
35
WB
LEFT
29
9.02
30
32
0
32
0
32
THRU
21
1.02
21
22
0
22
0
22
RIGHT
25
1.02
26
27
0
27
0
27
BKGD = BACKGROUND
MVNT= MOVEMENT
Notes:
I11 The background growth reflects 1.87% per year as calculated in Table 6.
121 The committed volumes have been obtained from Table 5D.
Cathy Sweetapple Associates Intersection Turning movements 2- 5-05 -a
TABLE 8C
SOUTH MIAMI MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT
INTERSECTION ANALYSES
EXISTING AND PROJECTED TURNING MOVEMENTS - PM PEAK HOUR
08- Feb -05
PM
PEAK HOUR
PEAK
2008
2008
2008
NET NEW
2005
PEAK
SEASON
BKGD
COMM.
B+C
EXTERNAL
2008
VOLUMES
SEASON
2005
VOLUMES
VOLUMES
VOLUMES
PROJECT
TOTAL
No.
INTERSECTION
MVNT
0111312005
FACTOR
VOLUMES
V]
E21
TRAFFIC
VOLUMES
1
Sunset Drive
NB
and SW 57 Ave
LEFT
84
1.02
86
91
0
91.
0
91
THRU
330
1.02
337
356
16
372
3 -
375
RIGHT
176
1.02
180
190
0
190
0
1 190
SB
LEFT
85
4.02
87
92
0
92
0
92
THRU
499
1.02
509
538
6
544
1
545
RIGHT
341
1.02
348
368
0
368
0
368
EB
LEFT
105
1.02
107
- 113-
0
113
0.
113
THRU
266
1.02
271
286
32
318
6
324
RIGHT
102
1.02
104
110
0
110
0
110
WB
LEFT
266
1.02
271
286
0
286
0
286
THRU
348
1.02
355
375
11386
1
387
RIGHT
72
1.02
73
77
0
77
0
77
PEAK
2008
2008
2008
NET NEW
2005
PEAK
SEASON
BKGD
COMM.
B +C
EXTERNAL
2008
VOLUMES
SEASON
2005
.'VOLUMES
VOLUMES
VOLUMES
PROJECT
TOTAL
No.
INTERSECTION
MVNT
01/13/2005
FACTOR
VOLUMES
Ill
12]
TRAFFIC
VOLUMES
2
Sunset Drive
NB
and SW 58 Ave
LEFT
33
1.02
34
36
0
36
14
50
THRU
59
1.02
60
63
50
113
9
122
RIGHT
37
1.02
38
40
33
73
3
76
S13
LEFT
29
1.02
30
32
0
32
0
32
THRU
49
1.02
50
53
17
70
1
71
RIGHT
39
1.02
40
42
0
42
0
42
EB
LEFT
131
1.02
134
142
0
142
0
142
THRU
386
1.02
394
417
0
417
0
417
RIGHT
37
1.02
38
40
13
1 53
1
54
WB
LEFT
60
1.02
61
64
5
69
1
70
THRU
447
1.02
456
482
0
482
0
482
RIGHT
199
1..02
203
215
0
215
0
215
PEAK
2008
2008
2008
NET NEW
2005
PEAK
SEASON
BKGD
COMM.
B +C
EXTERNAL.
2008
.VOLUMES
SEASON
2005
VOLUMES
VOLUMES
VOLUMES
PROJECT
TOTAL
-No.'
INTERSECTION
MVNT
01/1312005
FACTOR
VOLUMES
[1]
f2l
TRAFFIC
VOLUMES
3
Sunset Drive
NB
_
and US-1
:LEFT
115
1.02
117
124
0
124
0
124
THRU
2000
1.02
2040
2157
0-
2157
0
2157
RIGHT
102
1.02
104
1100
110
0
110
SB
LEFT
42
1.02
43
45 -
0
45
0
45
THRU
2799
1.02
2855
3018
0
3018
0
3018
RIGHT
271
1.02
276
292 -
0
292
0,
292
EB
THRU
485
1.02
495
523
27
550
1
551
RIGHT
91
1.02
93
98
0
98
0
98
WB
THRU
464
1.02
473
500
77
577
14
59"1
RIGHT
20
1.02
20
21
0
21
0
21
BKGD= BACKGROUND
MVNT= MOVEMENT
Notes:
[1] The background growth reflects 187% per year as calculated in Table 6.
[2] The committed volumes have been obtained from Table 5B.
Cathy Sweetapple Associates Intersection Tuming movements 2505 -a
TABLE 8D
SOUTH MIAMI MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT
INTERSECTION ANALYSES
EXISTING AND PROJECTED TURNING MOVEMENTS - PM PEAK HOUR
06- Feb -05
PM PEAK HOUR
PEAK
2008
2008
2008
NET NEW
2005
PEAK
SEASON
BKGD
COMM.
B +C
EXTERNAL
2008
VOLUMES
SEASON
2005
VOLUMES
VOLUMES
VOLUMES
PROJECT
TOTAL
No.
INTERSECTION
MVNT
01/13/2005
FACTOR
VOLUMES
1
[2]
TRAFFIC
VOLUMES
4
SW 73 Street
NB
and US-1
THRU
2183
1.02
2227
2354
0
2354
0
2354
RIGHT
104
1.02
106
112
29
1 133
1
134
SB
LEFT
33
1.02
34
36
0
36
0
36
THRU
2770
1.02
2825
2986
0
2986
0
2986
WB
LEFT
290.
1.02
296
313
59
372
10
382
RIGHT
102
9.02
104
110
0
110
0
110
PEAK
2008
2008
2008
NET NEW
2005
PEAK
SEASON
BKGD
comm.
B +C
EXTERNAL
2008
VOLUMES
SEASON
2005
VOLUMES
.VOLUMES
VOLUMES
PROJECT.
TOTAL
No.
INTERSECTION
MVNT
01/13/2005
FACTOR
VOLUMES
[1]
[21
TRAFFIC
VOLUMES
5
SW 74 Street
NS
and SW 57 Ave
LEFT
25
1.02
26
27
7
34
1
35
THRU
473
1.02
482
510
7
517
1
518
.RIGHT
21
1.02
21
22
0
22
0
22
SB
LEFT
19
1.02
19
20
0
20
0
20
THRU
636
1.02
649
.686
19
705
3
708
'RIGHT
65
1.02
66
70
0
70
0
70
EB
LEFT -
53
1.02
54
57
0
57
0
57
THRU
32
1.02
33
35
0
35
0
35
RIGHT
41
1.02
42
44
19
63
3
66
WE
LEFT
80
1.02
61
64
0
64 -
0
64
THRU
50
1.02
51
54
0
54
0
54
RIGHT
45
1.02
46
49
0
49
0
49
BKGD= BACKGROUND
MVNT= - MOVEMENT
Notes:
[1] The background growth reflects 1.87% per year as calculated in Table 5.
[2] The committed volumes have been obtained from Table 5B.
Cathy Sweetapple Associates Intersection Turning movements 2S05-a
m
Table 9 — AM and PM Peak Hour Study Intersection LOS
Signalized Study Intersections
AM Peak Hour
Existing LOS
AM Peak Hour
2008 Total Traffic LOS
PM Peak Hour
Existing LOS
PM Peak Hour
2008 Total Traffic LOS
Sunset Drive and SW 57 Avenue
D
D
D
D
Sunset Drive and SW 58 Avenue
B
C
D
D
Sunset Drive and US -1
C
D
D
E
SW 73 Street and US -1
B
B
B
B
SW 74 Street and SW 57 Avenue
C
C
C
C
,I
• F
s - - - --
�1r
S W 5 8 T H A
A V E N U E
v
oovximen sm�r
oovrNroxrl sm¢r
Y
S W 5 8 T H C O U R T
t .< .
SW 58TH
COURT
— —
0
mn
O
>�d
j
Ml
A
O
TP
Z
!u`
m
N
— m
m -
P�
3
-
«.. ooxNro�Yrsmlx.y
ooKxmxr� ��
S W 5 8 T H A V E N U E
,I
• F
s - - - --
�1r
O
SW 57TH C O U R T oxnrowN s1dE> =F N
SW 57TH
0 . COURT
CL
[�
b
E 'sC
ar
v ry�
e a`t
In
Sm
rt H
Y
O'0'0M- 1 'OOro Orr O ..� v- i- I�A'oOrrG� v-I-i A:07JA00�7�ro0'Opr r
gmmmoro@ @ oo Wooro @@ oo 57 0 voo O �'a -I�x7 A:i7 �17J 0.0 (A W'0 -iDV rr ggg�ZN
(D J1t' TZ ]fit•' bl N n @ A @ O O y q p @ N @ @ .@...@« @ @ O O W. W o 0 @ ro @ @ @ @ W W @ ° n @ p O O 'n ci
!n M .a' N N a@ N X y N N N N N @ Cp ° !n N =1 W W W W W� t o
7 7 N ro a@ 0 n n y Q m, ro. 7 Ono 6. �. N 0 n 0 a1 F1 n a n a n n W O !�. N N N E n' a a n t9 0• n@ o X X X X S N
3oca o °° �_. oo a @ @c >@ ro m ad'�'�@ _ @�pnm O 'off
-<C < '9 v.@ @ a .� Cl Q �.o'n @@ c c > > o o Q @@ c c o 0 m 3 3 3 a a
£ of W W m ro@ W W �. << 'n D O a A <o N
O'V ;C m 'ti m N N1 W W 5`i Iy W W @@ 7C m m rt o D 17 D m O -< << c c c c o1 .ry
C @= K@ a ro n n1 v. ° �: m_ m i m m° O ?�: m ni �.. �, m' m o O z W 41 v m <° v ro N W@
�. N @ a n a W acv @ •. @. a m m' W - N x m �. x W- @ i m v° W z A7 T7 o vm,
CD i O O @ @ fA @ 'O O p @ @ @ @ '0 0 'DDS ❑ (n In m a a ,._- a @ a @
@ `a m m W O O @ @ @ 'oO° - "aD9 O <O @ @ c c @ So �
ya@ C @�@� D ® @ro�@cW1 D @_0 m W W D �•D �7 °1� v� - mm to o. r+•
o m m a@ 'm D n o o m =- a @ rn D n o @ oc N W .Z7 17 ro n ro n> o m m �7 W %7 @ i @ W ), a 3 n cc
W ry' @< 9 v @< 9= 3 @ m W@ a I m D n o __.@ @ n n Q d
S S @ a a ro m D �
rn d m F W¢ m @ m` �7 F W m @ a = i w = d
@' i W% O n @ C i. n. C @ �1 ?7 m W m d W m
m to3cnm ° >, -acn ° @ 5a a� S a @ @ a�mao w
=n� m `m o' n o1�. W1:W N ay n �ivN� °' �O�o`D �_
@ @- a •• n W n -. O a W W m 3 n@ .. m W N o
a @ ° m n @— n m B @@ n °— T 3 3
F- @ _ Qo _ @ @ @ a @ y@ W 3
n 3 -- m
m @ F F m m F 3 cD
m m
CL
° m n �'
- m - a @
CL @ m W
0
i. m F n nni nni
@ m
@
N N
Vroi @
p N
ti
N
O
° 0i<
<@!_
O N°i SON W A VOCOO, V 0 - A O Q W ? y 3
pop-- .� @ N mice
N O)(h GOON Iv •. 3 m a
Jcn .p cOOCnN N V V O NOO�tD W V NOO NO �-� ° N=
N O W C O 0 W o 0 0 J W W O A 0 A N 0> c l c J N 0 N W V N '.N, 0 0 001 W A N0 V W y 0 1 V A O (n O A W N° c o m °
V W OJ W NNO)o (Oo W NCO V OCnOJNOJ W o o (PO .A. 01 W JOAJ NO0C11 W O W o W (Oo c .P W
f/ 4 (� Vi C W m W N W f� N C N W y N N W m W N m. -- W W M o C N N y N N N N N W W W W W I.
a a. o n n 0 N- N m m �:
_ _
F6n��E, m co m'@' a@' �� mmmW�.'v my n n nn mm
'x N N N rn N N N N W @ @@ n n N m m t
N ro N N N N N N (@/P N N C@l1 (@/1 •^ y N N N N N N M N N (@i1 C@ir 4@i
I
I
S W 5 8 T H A
A V E N U E
Y
0
A
Z
— m
m -
-
SW 57TH C O U R T oxnrowN s1dE> =F N
SW 57TH
0 . COURT
CL
[�
b
E 'sC
ar
v ry�
e a`t
In
Sm
rt H
Y
O'0'0M- 1 'OOro Orr O ..� v- i- I�A'oOrrG� v-I-i A:07JA00�7�ro0'Opr r
gmmmoro@ @ oo Wooro @@ oo 57 0 voo O �'a -I�x7 A:i7 �17J 0.0 (A W'0 -iDV rr ggg�ZN
(D J1t' TZ ]fit•' bl N n @ A @ O O y q p @ N @ @ .@...@« @ @ O O W. W o 0 @ ro @ @ @ @ W W @ ° n @ p O O 'n ci
!n M .a' N N a@ N X y N N N N N @ Cp ° !n N =1 W W W W W� t o
7 7 N ro a@ 0 n n y Q m, ro. 7 Ono 6. �. N 0 n 0 a1 F1 n a n a n n W O !�. N N N E n' a a n t9 0• n@ o X X X X S N
3oca o °° �_. oo a @ @c >@ ro m ad'�'�@ _ @�pnm O 'off
-<C < '9 v.@ @ a .� Cl Q �.o'n @@ c c > > o o Q @@ c c o 0 m 3 3 3 a a
£ of W W m ro@ W W �. << 'n D O a A <o N
O'V ;C m 'ti m N N1 W W 5`i Iy W W @@ 7C m m rt o D 17 D m O -< << c c c c o1 .ry
C @= K@ a ro n n1 v. ° �: m_ m i m m° O ?�: m ni �.. �, m' m o O z W 41 v m <° v ro N W@
�. N @ a n a W acv @ •. @. a m m' W - N x m �. x W- @ i m v° W z A7 T7 o vm,
CD i O O @ @ fA @ 'O O p @ @ @ @ '0 0 'DDS ❑ (n In m a a ,._- a @ a @
@ `a m m W O O @ @ @ 'oO° - "aD9 O <O @ @ c c @ So �
ya@ C @�@� D ® @ro�@cW1 D @_0 m W W D �•D �7 °1� v� - mm to o. r+•
o m m a@ 'm D n o o m =- a @ rn D n o @ oc N W .Z7 17 ro n ro n> o m m �7 W %7 @ i @ W ), a 3 n cc
W ry' @< 9 v @< 9= 3 @ m W@ a I m D n o __.@ @ n n Q d
S S @ a a ro m D �
rn d m F W¢ m @ m` �7 F W m @ a = i w = d
@' i W% O n @ C i. n. C @ �1 ?7 m W m d W m
m to3cnm ° >, -acn ° @ 5a a� S a @ @ a�mao w
=n� m `m o' n o1�. W1:W N ay n �ivN� °' �O�o`D �_
@ @- a •• n W n -. O a W W m 3 n@ .. m W N o
a @ ° m n @— n m B @@ n °— T 3 3
F- @ _ Qo _ @ @ @ a @ y@ W 3
n 3 -- m
m @ F F m m F 3 cD
m m
CL
° m n �'
- m - a @
CL @ m W
0
i. m F n nni nni
@ m
@
N N
Vroi @
p N
ti
N
O
° 0i<
<@!_
O N°i SON W A VOCOO, V 0 - A O Q W ? y 3
pop-- .� @ N mice
N O)(h GOON Iv •. 3 m a
Jcn .p cOOCnN N V V O NOO�tD W V NOO NO �-� ° N=
N O W C O 0 W o 0 0 J W W O A 0 A N 0> c l c J N 0 N W V N '.N, 0 0 001 W A N0 V W y 0 1 V A O (n O A W N° c o m °
V W OJ W NNO)o (Oo W NCO V OCnOJNOJ W o o (PO .A. 01 W JOAJ NO0C11 W O W o W (Oo c .P W
f/ 4 (� Vi C W m W N W f� N C N W y N N W m W N m. -- W W M o C N N y N N N N N W W W W W I.
a a. o n n 0 N- N m m �:
_ _
F6n��E, m co m'@' a@' �� mmmW�.'v my n n nn mm
'x N N N rn N N N N W @ @@ n n N m m t
N ro N N N N N N (@/P N N C@l1 (@/1 •^ y N N N N N N M N N (@i1 C@ir 4@i
I
I
b
E 'sC
ar
v ry�
e a`t
In
Sm
rt H
Y
O'0'0M- 1 'OOro Orr O ..� v- i- I�A'oOrrG� v-I-i A:07JA00�7�ro0'Opr r
gmmmoro@ @ oo Wooro @@ oo 57 0 voo O �'a -I�x7 A:i7 �17J 0.0 (A W'0 -iDV rr ggg�ZN
(D J1t' TZ ]fit•' bl N n @ A @ O O y q p @ N @ @ .@...@« @ @ O O W. W o 0 @ ro @ @ @ @ W W @ ° n @ p O O 'n ci
!n M .a' N N a@ N X y N N N N N @ Cp ° !n N =1 W W W W W� t o
7 7 N ro a@ 0 n n y Q m, ro. 7 Ono 6. �. N 0 n 0 a1 F1 n a n a n n W O !�. N N N E n' a a n t9 0• n@ o X X X X S N
3oca o °° �_. oo a @ @c >@ ro m ad'�'�@ _ @�pnm O 'off
-<C < '9 v.@ @ a .� Cl Q �.o'n @@ c c > > o o Q @@ c c o 0 m 3 3 3 a a
£ of W W m ro@ W W �. << 'n D O a A <o N
O'V ;C m 'ti m N N1 W W 5`i Iy W W @@ 7C m m rt o D 17 D m O -< << c c c c o1 .ry
C @= K@ a ro n n1 v. ° �: m_ m i m m° O ?�: m ni �.. �, m' m o O z W 41 v m <° v ro N W@
�. N @ a n a W acv @ •. @. a m m' W - N x m �. x W- @ i m v° W z A7 T7 o vm,
CD i O O @ @ fA @ 'O O p @ @ @ @ '0 0 'DDS ❑ (n In m a a ,._- a @ a @
@ `a m m W O O @ @ @ 'oO° - "aD9 O <O @ @ c c @ So �
ya@ C @�@� D ® @ro�@cW1 D @_0 m W W D �•D �7 °1� v� - mm to o. r+•
o m m a@ 'm D n o o m =- a @ rn D n o @ oc N W .Z7 17 ro n ro n> o m m �7 W %7 @ i @ W ), a 3 n cc
W ry' @< 9 v @< 9= 3 @ m W@ a I m D n o __.@ @ n n Q d
S S @ a a ro m D �
rn d m F W¢ m @ m` �7 F W m @ a = i w = d
@' i W% O n @ C i. n. C @ �1 ?7 m W m d W m
m to3cnm ° >, -acn ° @ 5a a� S a @ @ a�mao w
=n� m `m o' n o1�. W1:W N ay n �ivN� °' �O�o`D �_
@ @- a •• n W n -. O a W W m 3 n@ .. m W N o
a @ ° m n @— n m B @@ n °— T 3 3
F- @ _ Qo _ @ @ @ a @ y@ W 3
n 3 -- m
m @ F F m m F 3 cD
m m
CL
° m n �'
- m - a @
CL @ m W
0
i. m F n nni nni
@ m
@
N N
Vroi @
p N
ti
N
O
° 0i<
<@!_
O N°i SON W A VOCOO, V 0 - A O Q W ? y 3
pop-- .� @ N mice
N O)(h GOON Iv •. 3 m a
Jcn .p cOOCnN N V V O NOO�tD W V NOO NO �-� ° N=
N O W C O 0 W o 0 0 J W W O A 0 A N 0> c l c J N 0 N W V N '.N, 0 0 001 W A N0 V W y 0 1 V A O (n O A W N° c o m °
V W OJ W NNO)o (Oo W NCO V OCnOJNOJ W o o (PO .A. 01 W JOAJ NO0C11 W O W o W (Oo c .P W
f/ 4 (� Vi C W m W N W f� N C N W y N N W m W N m. -- W W M o C N N y N N N N N W W W W W I.
a a. o n n 0 N- N m m �:
_ _
F6n��E, m co m'@' a@' �� mmmW�.'v my n n nn mm
'x N N N rn N N N N W @ @@ n n N m m t
N ro N N N N N N (@/P N N C@l1 (@/1 •^ y N N N N N N M N N (@i1 C@ir 4@i
I
I
P:\ProJ \55002 Sath MI.el Corp\d°p \%0D2 Boundary. deg 9/23/294 6:29:27 AM E07
0a� 0 = =1-- ®1 1 (D(R®00 •U 4 100 1 q m # *6
6
qq
I�
III i
a®
s
N7.
I 83�
i
i
i
s
L
}8 •° a° y10
Y
Prepared tor:
ef9ngMaf —11d 1Ih a "h°
tur, d ... he
_191--I 1 d l
SOUTH: MIAMI CORPORATION
L J
E.R. Brownell
& Associates, Inc.
y
Topographic S
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
3162 Ceml Way
LANG PLANNERS SURVEYORS k MAPPERS
IWI..L Flerldd, 33145
phis \ii ♦ ey
305- 446 - 3511. WWW.ERBROWNELL.COM
Drawn
303 - 444 -2034 (FAX)
M11- FL
b : ALR Ref.
Chk. h : T.B. Seaia: 1 " =30'
F.B. 993 PLS PSI No. 2691
Dale: 09 22 O4 Cer111iegtlon No. L2391
O
SW 58th AVENUE
—
v
S e
# ❑g
' ^
—
�
J
1
Ne WA4 SgvdA
SA.n eIJNe
rb
i
,�
s
L
}8 •° a° y10
Y
Prepared tor:
ef9ngMaf —11d 1Ih a "h°
tur, d ... he
_191--I 1 d l
SOUTH: MIAMI CORPORATION
E.R. Brownell
& Associates, Inc.
I F,
of Iarlda IICBVPa
—.pr d
Topographic S
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
3162 Ceml Way
LANG PLANNERS SURVEYORS k MAPPERS
IWI..L Flerldd, 33145
phis \ii ♦ ey
305- 446 - 3511. WWW.ERBROWNELL.COM
Drawn
303 - 444 -2034 (FAX)
M11- FL
b : ALR Ref.
Chk. h : T.B. Seaia: 1 " =30'
F.B. 993 PLS PSI No. 2691
Dale: 09 22 O4 Cer111iegtlon No. L2391