The URL can be used to link to this page

02-10-05 Item 3South Miami r' All - America Oily 2001 City of South Miami To: Honorable Mayor, Vice Mayor Commission Members From: Maria Davis City Manager ORDINANCE Date: February 10, 2005 ITEM No. Re: LDC Rezoning: TODD(MU -4) to PUD -M: Codina Development Corp. AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO A REQUEST TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY CHANGING THE ZONING USE DISTRICT FROM "TODD(MU -4) ", TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (MIXED USE -4) TO "PUD -M" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MIXED USE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6600 -6640 SW 57 AVENUE AND 5757 SW 68 STREET; THE PURPOSE OF THE ZONE CHANGE IS TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A MIXED USE PROJECT CONSISTING OF MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, RETAIL USES AND A PARKING GARAGE; SETTING FORTH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RELATED TO THE DETERMINATION OF CONCURRENCY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. SUMMARY OF REQUEST The applicant, Codina Development Corp., is requesting a rezoning of a seven acre property as legally described above in order to construct a mixed use project including residential buildings, parking and retail uses with 409 dwelling units and 12,476 square feet of commercial space. According to the information submitted with the application, the dwelling unit density will be 58.4 units per acre. The floor area ratio for the total proposed project is listed as 1.54. The complex is to be called "Red Road Commons ". The current zoning on the subject property is "TODD(MU -4)" Transit Oriented Development District (Mixed -Use 4) Use District. The applicant is requesting a zone change for the property to PUD -M, Planned Unit Development -Mixed Use. The current TODD(MU -4) Zoning District LDC Rezoning February 10, 2005 Page 2 of 8 permits residential and commercial uses, permits two stories in height and does not limit development with a maximum floor area ratio or units per acre formula. The PUD submission is to be considered in two parts. The first is a zone map change ordinance which creates the PUD -M on the City's official map. Issues such as density, compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, traffic, parking requirements, height of buildings, and concurrency are dealt with as part of the zone map change. The second part is the applicant's request for approval by resolution of the specific PUD development plan. Specific issues related to building design, landscaping, and other site plan features are dealt with in a companion item. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Planned Unit Development (PUD) is a zoning district which can be applied for and created on the City's official zoning map if a development is to be done as a unit under single ownership and has one or more principal buildings. A PUD encourages design flexibility in location of buildings, open space, and provision of amenities. Development in a PUD district does not follow standard dimensional requirements (setbacks, heights of buildings), floor - area - ratio, or dwelling units per acre. These standards are set forth in advance as part of the submitted master site plan. The following sections of the City's Land Development Code govern the general design, development, and review of a PUD application: Section 20 -3,7 (A) -(B) Planned Unit Development — provides design guidelines for all PUD's regulating density, traffic, screening, off - street parking, service areas, building heights, and pedestrian amenities. Section 20 -3.7 (E) PUD -M, Planned Unit Development- Mixed Use- specific regulations governing uses allowed, minimum development site size and location. PUD -M is one of three PUD types. Section 20 -5.12 Planned Unit Development approvals — sets forth regulations governing the review procedures and submittal requirements for all PUD's. Section 20 -4.1 Adequate public facilities and services ( Concurrency)- establishes level of services (LOS) standards for water and sewage, solid waste, traffic, and recreation / open space. These standards are reviewed at the development permit stage for major new construction proj ects. All of the above LDC sections are attached. SITE ANALYIS The subject property is bounded by SW 68th Street on the south, SW 57th Ave. on the east, SW 66th Street on the north. The west boundary is a FPL transmission facility and a driveway into the City's Community Center. The property is occupied by a parking lot and three one -story buildings used for offices, a real estate school, a foreign consulate, a social service agency and a LDC Rezoning February 10, 2005 Page 3 of 8 night club. Surrounding Parcels DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS 1. Comprehensive Plan: The project site is within the TODD Future Land Use category which encourages a mix of uses. The district was developed to take advantage of its proximity to the Metro Rail. The category allows for flexible building heights up to a maximum of eight (8) stories. The rezoning supports the following Comprehensive Plan goals and policies: HOUSING Goal 1 To assure the availability of sound and affordable housing for all current and future residents of the City of South Miami with special focus on infill and redevelopment ........ Policy 1.3.6 The City and the County will jointly support development in the Rapid Transit Zone in order to encourage mixed -use residential multi family projects ............. LAND USE Policy 2.1.4 Discourage urban commercial sprawl by promoting growth in the core area surrounding the Metro Rail transit station by creating a district for the new growth which is contained and transit - oriented, thereby relieving the pressure for commercial re- zonings outside of this core area Goal 3 To achieve a tax base adequate to support a high level of municipal services via increased mixed -use and flexible building heights in conjunction with a Transit - Oriented Development District [TODD]. 2. Minimum Requirements: The LDC requires that an application for a PUD -M shall be for a project which is on a site of at least 4 acres. The subject application is on a seven acre Comprehensive Plan Land Development Code Actual Use Existing Land Use Existing Zoning District Category North Single Family Residential RS -4, RM 18 Single Family homes Multifamily Residential Single Family Residential Apartments Low density multi - family East - - - - -- - - - -- Church South TODD TODD(LI -4) Light industrial; warehouses, social service agency West Public Institutional PI, Public Institutional; RS -4 FPL Sub station DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS 1. Comprehensive Plan: The project site is within the TODD Future Land Use category which encourages a mix of uses. The district was developed to take advantage of its proximity to the Metro Rail. The category allows for flexible building heights up to a maximum of eight (8) stories. The rezoning supports the following Comprehensive Plan goals and policies: HOUSING Goal 1 To assure the availability of sound and affordable housing for all current and future residents of the City of South Miami with special focus on infill and redevelopment ........ Policy 1.3.6 The City and the County will jointly support development in the Rapid Transit Zone in order to encourage mixed -use residential multi family projects ............. LAND USE Policy 2.1.4 Discourage urban commercial sprawl by promoting growth in the core area surrounding the Metro Rail transit station by creating a district for the new growth which is contained and transit - oriented, thereby relieving the pressure for commercial re- zonings outside of this core area Goal 3 To achieve a tax base adequate to support a high level of municipal services via increased mixed -use and flexible building heights in conjunction with a Transit - Oriented Development District [TODD]. 2. Minimum Requirements: The LDC requires that an application for a PUD -M shall be for a project which is on a site of at least 4 acres. The subject application is on a seven acre LDC Rezoning February 10, 2005 Page 4 of 8 site. In addition the development site must be within 1200 feet of the Metro Rail station. The applicant states that the project site is 1092 feet from the Metro Rail station. 3. Uses Permitted: The PUD -M allows a limited number of uses which are listed in Section 20 -3.7 (E) of the LDC. It includes retail establishments and multi- family residential uses being proposed by the developer. 4. Density- Number of Dwelling Units: The proposed development, as submitted has 409 dwelling units or a density of 58.3 dwelling units per acre. PUD regulations specify that the number of units permitted shall be governed by the Comprehensive Plan land use category in effect for the site. The TODD land use category does not provide limitations on number of units as long as the required parking is provided. 5. Density- Floor Area Ratio: The applicant's proposed floor area ratio is 1.54. PUD regulations specify that intensity or FAR of a project is governed by the Comprehensive Plan land use category in effect for the site. The TODD land use category does not provide a specific FAR limitation. 6. Dwellinn Units - Minimum Floor Area: The applicant's proposal indicates a range of dwelling unit types, including 175 one - bedroom units; 201 two- bedroom units; and 31 four bedroom units. The size of the units range from 604 sq. ft. for a one bedroom; 887 and 946 sq. ft. for two bedroom units; 1785 sq. ft. for four bedroom units. 7. Dwelling Units- Minimum Average Size The applicant's proposal provides that the average size for all of the dwelling units is 842 square feet. PUD regulations do not require a minimum average size for dwelling units. As part of the redraft of the LDC, the City's Zoning Task Force recommended that residential developments in this area ( TODD district) must maintain a minimum average dwelling unit size of 800 square feet. It is felt that this standard would assure a quality level of dwelling units in residential projects. 8. Building Height: The applicant is proposing to build a total of six residential buildings The building heights vary. There are four and five story buildings in the south and center part of the development and a four story building facing SW 57 Avenue on the east side. A three story building will face single family homes on the north side with the interior portion of that building being four stories. At the northeast corner is a four story building opposite the existing multi - family complex. A five story parking garage covers most of site on the west side abutting the FPL facility. Current PUD regulations do not specify specific height limits. The Code states that project buildings must take into account surrounding heights of buildings and the limitation on heights set forth in the assigned Comprehensive Plan's land use category (up to eight stories). 9. Parking Requirements: The applicant is providing 1,028 total parking spaces, which includes a parking garage, a small surface lot and on -site street parking. The total number of required parking spaces for the proposed re- zoning (including residential and retail uses) is 948. LDC Rezoning February 10, 2005 Page 5 of 8 10. Affordable Housing: The City of South Miami has made a commitment to support and encourage the creation of affordable (moderate priced) housing units. The Comprehensive Plan specifically sets forth the following housing policies : Policy 1.3.5 The City will support and assist the efforts of private organizations to construct at least five affordable housing units per year. Polices The City and the County will jointly support development in the Rapid Transit Zone in order to encourage mixed - use /residential multi family projects containing affordable housing units. The Red Road Commons project is an excellent opportunity for the City to encourage affordable housing to be built. The developer should be required to commit at least 5% of the units as affordable housing units. 11. Adequate Public Facilities - Concurrence: The applicant's project is above the concurrency threshold limits, thereby requiring an assessment for meeting the level of service (LOS) concurrency standards listed in Section 20 -4.1 of the Land Development Code. For purposes of this report, presented below is a summary of the developers' responsibilities related to concurrency: a) Solid Waste • LOS and capacity to be determined by Miami -Dade County based on capacity of the transfer facility. • Developer to provide copy of contract to the City b) Water and Sewage • LOS and capacity to be determined by Miami -Dade County • Developer to provide evidence of approval of appropriate County and State agencies c) Drainage • Concurrency evidenced by compliance with Florida Building Code and approved by DERM. d) Trafc /Streets • Applicant has submitted a Traffic Impact Study showing reduced PM peak trips after PUD is constructed; and major intersection at LOS - B • Additional traffic counts at certain intersections requested in order to determine needed traffic signalization adjustments or lane improvements • Note: the site is located within a City designated Infill and Redevelopment Area and is exempt from meeting transportation concurrency standards (Comprehensive Plan, p.65). However, the impact of the proposed development on traffic operations will be LDC Rezoning February 10, 2005 Page 6 of 8 covered in the review of the resolution adopting the submitted master site plan. e) Schools • Project impact to be determined by Public Schools. • Dade County Public Schools has been notified of the project and staff invited to sit with Planning Board at hearing. • The Developer shall provide evidence of assessment or mitigation agreement with Dade County Public Schools. f� Recreation Facilities • Project population estimate- 927 • LOS: City Comprehensive Plan: 4 acres per 1000 population. • Capacity: The City is at capacity. • Project will require the addition of recreation land — estimated 3.7 acres • Developer must specify in a development agreement that within five years he will pay for or produce 3.7 acres of land for public park or recreational purposes. (See attached formula to determine concurrency costs) STAFF OBSERVATIONS 1. The proposed rezoning is consistent with and supports the goals and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan (See No. 1, Development Analysis above). 2. A residential development at this location would take full advantage of being adjacent to the transit station and within walking distance of shops, post office, hospitals, restaurants and other amenities of the downtown area. The use would also provide a transition between lower density residential to the north and commercial development to the south. 3. The property is located in the Community Redevelopment Area. The rezoning is consistent with the goals and objectives of the CRA and the "Hometown Plan Area 2 Report", which calls for mixed use development on this site (p.33). 4. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the recommendations of the Zoning Task Force for this site. In 2002 the Task Force's subcommittee on TODD carried out considerable study on the district. At that time it was recommended that this site be re -zoned to allow 4 stories plus 2 additional stories as a bonus. The recommendation also suggested a height limit of 3 stories across from the residential areas on the north side of the property. The PUD -M re- zoning will allow development as specified in the Master Site Plan as submitted. Buildings indicated at four and five stories on this plan will be approved as part of the master site plan approval. The proposed master site plan will also be approved with a limit of three stories across from the residential areas to the north. 5. The traffic pattern from a residential development is generally more dispersed throughout the day and night and has less impact on peak traffic. Traffic analysis of the current commercial development as compared with the traffic that will be generated by the proposed LDC Rezoning February 10, 2005 Page 7 of 8 residential development, indicates that the proposed land use change may actually reduce peak hour vehicle trips generated by this property. However, certain traffic operations and management adjustments will be addressed in the review of the resolution approving the master site plan. PLANNING BOARD ACTION The Planning Board at its September 27, 2004 meeting adopted a motion by a vote of 5 aye and 1 nay ( Mr. Illas) recommending approval of the requested zone change with the conditions set forth by staff below. The Board strongly suggested that the developer's contribution related to recreation space should be worked out prior to the issuance of a building permit. RECOMMENDATION The City Commission approved the proposed rezoning with the following conditions on first reading at its October 19, 2004 meeting: (1) The applicant shall execute a Development Agreement which must include the conditions set forth below and in the staff report pertaining to the requested zone map change and shall incorporate all conditions which may be adopted as part of the approval of the project's PUD Master Site Plan (2) Applicant shall include in the Development Agreement: (a) an agreement that within five years the developer will pay for or produce 3.7 acres of land for public park or recreational purposes; (b) an agreement that 5% of the multi - family units constructed shall be classified and marketed as affordable housing units. (3) Applicant shall provide evidence of concurrency compliance by submitting to the City the appropriate documents needed to prove concurrency with water, sewerage, schools, and solid waste. (4) The applicant shall provide to the City a Unity of Title document for the subject development site; the unity of title shall be prepared and filed in accordance with Section 20 -5.16 of the South Miami Land Development Code. FINAL REVIEW PROCEDURE The City Commission has agreed to place the Red Road Commons project on a special City Commission meeting agenda scheduled for Wednesday February 23, 2005 (7:00 PM). At that time the City Commission may take action on all three legislative elements. Attachments: Application/Letter of Intent /Location map Applicable Regulations — PUD, Concurrency Copies of Public Notices Excerpt Planning Board Minutes- 9 -27 -04 Site Plan / Development Plan MD /DOD /S Y E: \Comm Items \2005\2 -10 -05 Workshop\Rezoning TODD to PUD -M Abraham Site.doc ,iP6 City of South Miami Planning & Zoning Department City Hall, 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida 33143 Telephone: (305) "663 -6326; Fax: (305) 666 -4591 JUL 2 8.2004, Application for Public Hearing Before Planning Board & City Commission Address of Subject Property:6600 - 6640 SW 57 AVENUE Lot(s) Block Subdivision Meets &Bounds: PB SEE ATTACHED SURVEY Applicant:: Phone; CODINA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Representative: Organization: , JERRY B. PROCTOR, ESQ.e m Address: Phone: 200 SO. BISCAYNE BLVD., SUITE 2500 MIAMI; FLORIDA 33131 - Property Owner: Si nature; ANTHONY R. ABRAHAM g fL Mailing Address: Phone: Z Z__ -z -z 6600 SW 57 AVENUE ads. G`�� MIAMI, FLORIDA 33143 Architect/Engineer: Phone: 305 - 666 -5474 I.ARIS GARCIA AS THE APPLICANT, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO THIS PROJECT: Owner: g Owner's Representative Contract to purchase Option. to purchase Tenant/Lessee - IS HEREBY MADE FOR THE FOLLOWING : - FPLEA&SE MITTED MATERIALS.. PLEASE CHECK THE APPROPRIATE ITEM: CHECK ALL THAT APPLY: Text Amendment to LDC Variance etter of intent X Zoning Map Amendment: .S.pecial .Use ustifications -for change X PUD Approval _ Special Exception Statement of hardship PUD Major Change. —Other X Proof of ownership or letter from owner Power of attorney Briefly explain application and cite specific Code sections: Contract to purchase SEE ATTACHED LETTER OF INTENT 3C Current survey (1 original sealed and signed /1 reduced copy @ 11 "x.17 ") X 7 copies of Site Plan ,and Floor Plans reduced copy @ 11 "`X 17" 20% Property -owner signatures XC Mailing labels (3 sets) and map' Section: Subsection: Page #: Amended Date: K Required Fee(s) The undersigned has read this completed application and represents that the information and all submitted materials are true and corre t t the best of the app1icant's knowledge and belief. l€3�rrT1 i �fPCt u'! f Orl -- -- APP cant's Signature anl- titl "e -- -- - -- -- - - - -- Upon receipt, applications and all submitted materials will be reviewed for compliance with the Land Development Code and other applicable registrations. Applications found not in compliance will be rejected and returned to the applicant. EDa'F E ONLY: Date of PB Hearing Date of Comm ission uired Petition Accepted a ent \73190 \13707\ # 685595 v 1 7/16/04 3:48 PM City of South Miami Planning & Zoning Department City Hall, 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida 33143 Telephone: (305)663 - 6326; Fax: (305) 566 -4591 Application for Public Hearing Before Planning Board & City Commission Address of Subject Property :5757SW 68 STREET Lot(s) Block Subdivision PB SEE ATTACHED SURVEY Meets & Bounds: . Applicant: Phone: COOINA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Representative; Organization: _ JERRY. B. PROCTOR, ESQ.. vI s r, " , Address: Phone: L .. 2f 200 SO. BISCAYNE BLVD., SUITE 250.0 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 _ - ._.__— •_ -.... Property Owner: Signature: COMMERCE LANE ENTERPRISES, INC. y Mailing Address: Phone: 1 5757 SW. 68 STREET MIAMI, FLORIDA 33143 0. - -7 1-19 C Architect/Engineer. Phone:- 305- 666 -5474 ARTS GARCIA AS THE APPLICANT, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO THIS PROJECT: Owner: Owner's Representative X Contract to purchase " . Option to purchase Tenant/Lessee APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE FOR THE FOLLOWING: ', SUBMITTED MATERIALS PLEASE CHECK THE APPROPRIATE ITEM: PLEASE CHECK ALL THAT APPLY: Text Amendment to LDC Variance X Letter of intent ` _ X' Zon,in� M2p_Amendment Special Use _ . Justifications for change _..__ . _ X. PUD Approval _Special Exception PUD Statement of hard ship �X Proof of ownership or letter from Major Change Other owner Power of attorney Briefly explain application and cite specific Code sections: _ Contract to purchase _ SEE ATTACHED LETTER OF INTENT Current survey (1 original sealed and . • signed/1 nedl1 reduced copy ' g @ 1 1x17 " C 7 copies of Site Plan and Floor Plans reduced copy @ TV x 17" _ 20% Property owner signatures X Mailing labels (3 sets) and map Section: Subsection: Page #: Amended Date: / Required Fee(s) The undersigned has read this completed application and represents that the information and all submitted materials are true and correct to the best of the applicant's lrnowledge and belief. App cant's P ignature and title Date Upon receipt, applications and all submitted materials will be reviewed for. compliance with the Land Development Code and other applicable registrations. Applications found not in compliance will be rejected and returned to the applicant. OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Filed Date of PB Hearing Date of Commission Petition Required Petition Accepted Method of Pa ment \73190\13707\ # 685596 v 1 7116104 3:48 PM t � c0 O N C, �D O 5950 City of South Miami w 0 20 Lon' Application No. PB -04 -015 Zone Map Change 0 TODD (MU -4) to PUD -M Planned Unit Development - Mixed Use 0 M m m 6600 -6640 SW 57th Avenue 'coo 6669 6364 6351' m rn 0 ti rn w rn ° 8 5 6350 w s. 6340 6345 6340 6325 0 p 6373 in n n n _ 06412 593564156411 SW 64T1� ■STr■■mrM%t��rr■rr■�■ ■ ■r ■■ ■ ■mr 5976 0 0 0 5944 0 6407 6401 6400 6401 6400 64D1 6400 6401 6400 ■ ■ 6415 6412 0 ■ ° 6411 6410 6411 6410 6411 6410 6411 6410 ■ 6429 0 6429 6426 6443 6421 6420 J 6420 6420 6421 6420 U 6443 6442 0 6443 6442 6445 6421 6421 6457 6450 0 20 6456 6461 ¢ 6431 6430 d 6431 6430 6431 6430 6431 6430 _ , 0 9 m 6420 1-' _ 6441 6440 6441 6440 6441 6440 6441 6440 6487 0 6481 Ug) 6501 6500 6501 6500 . 6501 6500 6501 6500 Lo 6501 0 N 6505' 6500 6501 6510 6511 6510 6511 6511 6510' • Cz 6519 0 6516 0 o m U) .6511 6521 6520 6520 6521 .6510 6520 6521 6520 m ■ 0 6532 6533 BSSO 6551 m 0 656530 6521 6531 6530 6531 6530 6531 6530 • 5987 6540 ski 0 D 5875 6540 5843 6540 6541 6540 6541 6540 ■ o 974 SW 66TH ST r ■ 0 0 .6600 0 5963 U, 5977 6601 c0 O N C, �D O 5950 6647 w 0 20 Lon' I 0 rn rn 0 M m m m 'coo 6669 0 o m v m m v o 0 o i m ° U') U) N o h O. ill ■ SUBJECT PROPERTY SVV FIRST 6701 ■ rn ■ r ■ S9si 5949. �n �n r� ti ■ - ° , OD o r ■ 6900 ° M y,5+�9 5196 0 m �,� 0 m 0 S> y1 61y� m 0 o s, `��' > �{ ■ V �s � osiu o w - ■ `fPj u' S� S> �G ■ y ao_ s V ■' S C • msQ ■ O se S�sp 5850 5842 S s8 g01 O dig 6 5621 0 m . W p� r ca 5 O O O T ■ 5630 ■ ■ o � 5950 0 0 w 0 co CD 6845 6900 ° M y,5+�9 5196 0 m �,� 0 m 0 S> y1 61y� m 0 o s, `��' > �{ ■ V �s � osiu o w - ■ `fPj u' S� S> �G ■ y ao_ s V ■' S C • msQ ■ O se S�sp 5850 5842 S s8 g01 O dig 6 5621 0 m . W p� r ca 5 O O O T ■ 5630 ■ ■ o � BfLZIN SUMBERG BAENA PRICE & AXELROD LLP A PARTNERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS 200 SOUTH BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, SUITE: 2500 - MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131-5340 TELEPHONE: (305) 374 -7560 - FAX: (305) 374 -7593 E -MAIL: INFOOBILZIN.COM - WWW.SILZIN.COM MERRY B. PROCTOR, ESQ, - DIRECT DIAL: (305) 350 -236 EMAIL: JPROCTOR @51LZIN.COM July •28, 2004 Hand Delivery Mr. Don O'Donniley,:AICP, Planning Director City of South Miamii 6130 Sunset Drive South Mianu, Florida 33143 Re: Zoning Application by Coding Development Corporation: Address: 6600 -6640 S..W. 57 Avenue (Red Road) and 5757 S:W. 6.8 Street Dear Mr. O'Donniley: Please accept the attached . application for rezoning and plan.approval of a Planned Unit Development (Mixed -Use) Development on the above - styled Property. The undersigned represents Codina Development Corporation ( "Codina "), , prospective developer of approximately 7 acres of land located at the southwest corner of SW 66 Street and SW 57 Avenue (Red Road). Codina hereby requests a district boundary change from TODD (MU -4 to ) Planned Unit Development. Mixed -Use (PUD -M), and concurrent site plan approval for development of the Property. Enclosed herewith please find the requisite - application fee, City of South Miaini application forms, proof of ownership of - -- properties surveys of the *property; publicriut ce maii.irng labels and a:ff davit --� ro e - - -- - -. • � p P rtY- owner notification affidavit, common area report, and copies of the proposed plans for the mixed -use development on the Property. -W3260\21531\ # 687239 v 1 7128/04 2:18 PM BILZIN SUMSERG BAENA PRICE & AXELROD LLP Mr. Don O'Donniley, AICP July 28, 2004 Page 2 Pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan. and Section 20- 3.7(e) (Planned Unit Developments -PUD -M Mixed- Use),-please note. the following: 1. The property is designated for Transit - Oriented Development District (TODD) (Flexible Height up to 8 stories) in the City's Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan provides as follows: Transit- Oriented Development District (TODD) Flexible Height'up to 8 stories). The Transit- Oriented Development District is intended to provide for the development of office uses, office services, office- related retail, retail, retail services, and residential uses in multi-story and -mixed -use projects that are characteristic of transit- oriented developments: Permitted heights and intensities shall be set forth in the Land Development Code, including design standards. Zoning regulations shall encourage development within the TODD in conjunction with.limiting new development within the Special Flood Hazard Area. The City shall pursue an incentives program for redevelopment including flexible building heights and designs standards to insure that responsible, effective and aesthetically pleasing projects. result. -The proposed development, as depicted on the attached plans prepared by Wolf6erg Alvarez & Associates, provides retail and residential uses (for rental) and a mixed -use design that complies. with the spirit and letter of the Comprehensive Plan designation for the property. '2. The PUD -M Zoning District encourages complementary combinations of uses, including multi- family residential and commercial uses, within 1,200. feet from any Metr_orail_Station:_._ have_ eizc- losed. an_aeri.al_photograph: from_ Miami - Dade __County which indicates an approximate distance of 1,092 feet between the property and the South Miami Station of Miami -Dade County's Metrorail Corridor. BILZIN SUMBERG BAENA PRICE & AXELROD_LLP Mr. Don O'Donniley, AICP July 28, 2004 Page 3 3 The PUD -M District permits multi- family, residential dwellings, accessory parking lots and structures, and retail stores: 4. The property exceeds the minimum site area for a PUD -M development of 4 acres. 5. The proposed site plan features considerable pedestrian access and a reduced intensity of development along SW 66 Street, adjacent to the residential community to. the north. The proposed intensity of development is compatible with the surrounding", area, which includes the large FPL. transmission- facility to the -west, retail .and industrial zoning and development to the south and southwest, and the higher- intensity apartment and Metrorail facilities in the area. Thank you for your consideration of this :application. :Very truly yours,. Jerry B. Proctor JBP:id Encl. c: Maria Davis, City Manager +� 1 I uVVVm i U II 1" Cllir �I, 19 % 411111111 !��`�% Vllll �afjl ile 1 h °IpV ; l �� r sm 1 III III "� v Lan. Ift 1 1 c , ''1 a+ y)' ate' P€< • `� - r D :z -m g A � monma DMO O yGI m tO�+ g ; w ; ^e p t• m �. ? Fly !03 AyoG O r �Z rrii � e=i m if ID r �G3 c> C, �O�a�N �M A�WNN' •"O � n x O z m C9 � ID N WL C m m N W O e o N .OFII3 T mal�i 9 Ew Yy °' "aiX 5F��Cww GN.a N N V N N N N N N N A m iu O a � � :z -m g A � monma yGI m tO�+ g ; w ; ^e p t• m �. ? Fly !03 AyoG O r �Z � e=i its �M C9 ID � e o N .OFII3 mal�i Ew Yy °' "aiX 5F��Cww iu N 'E' cr x ir ZONING REGULATIONS 20 -3.7 (E) Mixed Use (PUD -M). (L', General Requirements. (a) A PUD -M district may be established for complementary and compatible combi- nations of commercial, office, hotel or motel, multi - family residential and similar uses directly located and related to the MetroRail station. (b) Such planned unit developments shall be subject to the general procedures, stan- dards -and requirements of this Code applicable to all planned unit development, as well as the requirements of this section: (c) The closest major entrance to any proposed PLTD -M development shall be not less than twelve hundred (1,200) feet from the MetroRail station, as measured along the shortest route to accommodate largest number of pedestrians. (2) Uses and Structures. (a) Principal and accessory uses and structures may be permitted in PUD -M devel- opments, subject to the limitations and requirements herein. (b) Specific uses and structures in a PUD -M district shall be as follows: i. Multi- family residential dwellings; ii. Hotels and motels; iii. Child care centers; iv. Houses of worship; V. Vocational schools, business colleges and similar uses; vi. Private clubs and lodges; vfi Professional and businesso ces, _rx3eri;cai and dental ci;,,;cs and offices and travel agencies; viii. Banks and savings associations; ix. Retail stores, except those dealing in used merchandise other than antiques; x. Business and personal service and repair establishments; xi. Eating and drinking places; xii. Cultural or recreational facilities; xiii. Parking lots and structures, subject to controls to insure parking integrity of the development; xiv.. Uses other than those listed above, required for the performance of govern - ment, except uses involving storage as the primary purpose; and xv. Structures and uses relating to the operation of public utilities and required to serve the development and neighboring areas; transit or related facilities other than yards, storage, switching or repair shops. 0 Vie minimurri site area for a PUD -M development shall--befour 14) net acres: (4) MetroRail Station Access. (a) MetroRafl station accessways may be required at second or third floor levels within the development where necessary to avoid pedestrian/vehicular conflicts. 67 20 -3.7 SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (b) Consideration shall be given in designing such accessways for their possible use by buildings and activities in the general area, but not a part of the planned unit development. (5) Approval of a PUD -M district shall not be given until arrangement for providing off-street parking and loading in specific amounts and locations are agreed upon by .the city and the applicant. (6) Uses in PUD -M developments shall be so arranged horizontally and vertically that:. .(a) Retail and service uses shall be concentrated for maximum pedestrian conve- nience and be located for easy accessibility by visitors and employees working in the development; (b) Residential access shall be separated from other access to the development; (c) Office uses shall be located so as to prevent interruption from all other uses; and (d) Loading zones shall be located so as to prevent' interference with pedestrian movements. (F) Hospital District (PUD -H). (1) General Requirements. A PUD -H district may be. established for complementary and compatible combinations of hospitals, medical offices, laboratories and related edu- cational facilities and other support services. Such development shall be subject to the general procedures and requirements of this Code applicable to all planned unit - developments, as well as the requirements of this Section. (2) Uses and Structures. =uxmr..- a:rd accessary- uses -ain structures may. a permitted- i n PTjW-i devel- opments, subject to the limitations and requirements herein. (b) Specific uses and structures in a PUD -H shall be the following hospital and accessory uses: i. Intermediate care facility; ii. Extended care facility; iii. Medical clinic; iv. Medical offices; v.. Laboratory and research facility; vi. Medical educational facilities; vii. Hospital support facilities including a laundry, cafeteria, dietary services, child care, staff and offices and data processing; viii. Convenience facilities for hospital staff, patients and visitors, including chapels, snack bars, gift shops and florists; and - ix. Any other uses determined as part-of the PUD.H application, to be corripat-- - ible with the existing and/or prospective character of the proposed develop= ment and surrounding area. (c) Accessory uses, such as convenience facilities, which may provide services to members of the public not associated with the hospital and/or to members of the .: ARTICLE IV OTHER REGULATIONS 20-4.1 Adequate public facilities and services. (A) Purpose. A development permit, Certificate of Completion (CC), Certificate of Occu- pancy (CO), or Certificate. of Use and Occupancy (CU) shall not be issued when level(s) of service (LOS) for public services and facilities do not meet or exceed LOS Standards, or when the issuance of a development permit and/or CC and/or CO and/or CU would result in a reduction of the actual LOS for any service or facility below the established LOS Standards, as specified below. (B) Applicability and Application. (1) New Development on Vacant Land. For new construction projects, concurrency deter- minations shall be made in conjunction with the earliest development approval which involves a site plan for development. (2) Building Additions and New Development on Occupied Parcels. Any addition which increases gross floor area by 5,000 square feet or more and increases public facility usage shall be subject to conct rrency review prior to granting of the CC or CU. Only incremental increase in facility capacity usage over existing usage will be assessed for concurrency. (3) Changes of Use on Occupied Parcels. Changes of use which increase required parking by 25 spaces shall be subject to concurrency review prior to- granting a CU. Only incremental increase in facility capacity usage over existing usage will be assessed for concurrency. (4) Exempt Projects. The following kinds of development and redevelopment shall not require a concurrency review. per this subsection. ; (a) Change of Use to Another Similar Use: Any change of use which clearly causes no increase in demand upon any public facility, or causes a reduction in demand on all public facilities, and does not increase the number of required parking spaces in excess of 25 parking spaces; (b) Residences: Single -family and two - family. dwellings on previously platted Iots or as part of waivers -of -plat; (c) Public Uses: Development such as a public or government facility which the City Commission finds essential to the health or safety of City residents; and (d) Existing Approvals: Projects considered as vested or committed and/or site plans approved before adoption of the Land Development Code on October 26, 1989.. (C) LOS Standards. (1) Streets. (a) South Dixie Highway (U.S. Z): Until December 31, 1995, the peak hour LOS standard shall be 115 percent of the peak traffic count in 1989. After December 31, 1995, the peak hour LOS standard shall be 150 percent of "D" capacity, as defined in the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Supp. No. 2 71 t v 20 -4.1 SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (b) Bird Road (S.W.. 40th Street): The peak hour LOS standard shall be 120 percent of "E" capacity. (c) Principal and 1bMinorArterials (Sunset Drive, Red Road, Kendall Drive): The peak �-. e.••.. T %iC ..J. -.7 .7 1- 77 i_ IITR r 1 1 Jiv... T nV at.auuaru Suatt ue r capacity, as Qennea in the adopted Comprehen- sive Plan. (d) Collectors (S.W. 48 Street, Miller Drive, S.W.• 62nd Avenue, and Ludlam Road): The peak hour LOS standard shall be "E" capacity, except that County collector roadways in the adopted Urban Infill Area are exempt from concurrency review requirements. (e) DRI Exception: The City will not issue any permit which would have the effect of lowering'the LOS below the levels specified above, unless such permits are issued pursuant to a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) approval. granted prior to adoption of the 1989 South Miami Comprehensive Plan on January 18, 1989. W RID Exception: The City will not issue any permit which would have the effect of lowering the LOS below the levels specified above, unless such permits are issued for development and/or redevelopment within an approved Redevelopment and Infill District (RID). (g) Ile 1lMinimis Impact Exception: The City will not issue any permit which would have the effect of lowering the LOS below the levels specified above, unless such permits are issued for development. and/or redevelopment which meets the conditions in Chapter 163.3180(6), Florida Statutes, and/or in Rule 9J- 5.0055, Florida Administrative Code. (2) Sewage. (a) The disposal systems shall operate with a design capacity of no less than 2 percent above average daily flow for the preceding year, or as determined to be sufficient by Metro -Dade County. (b) The County system maintains capacity to collect and dispose of 100 gallons of sewage per capita per day. (c) For the unsewered properties, LOS shall be the issuance of a Metro-Dade Health Department septic tank permit. (3) Water. (a) The water system shall operate with a rated capacity of no less than 2 percent above the maximum daily flow for the preceding year, or as determined to be sufficient by Metro -Dade County. (b) Water is delivered to. users at a pressure no less than 20 pounds per square inch (psi) and no greater than 100 psi. Minimum fire flows shall be maintained as approved by the Metro -Dade Fire Department. (c) The County system maintains capacity to deliver up to 200 gallons per capita per day. Supp. No. 2 72 OTHER REGULATIONS 20-4.1 (4) Drainage. Any development shall adequately accommodate runoff from the 1 -day, 1 -in -10 -year frequency storm. (5) ,Solid Waste. The County solid waste disposal system shall maintain a minimum capacity of five years, or capacity as determined by Metro -Dade County to be sufficient. A generation rate of 7 pounds per person per day may be used for calculation. (6) Recreation. The public (City and School Board) park land within the City shall equal at least 4 acres per 1,000 population. This shall include the School Board recreational land. (D) Concurrency Review Procedures. (1) Responsibility. The Building and Planning Department is responsible for concurrency as part of the development permit process. (2) Measurement of LOS. Measurement and evaluation of LOS shall follow these regula- tions, as necessary for approval. The capacity and availability of services shall be determined by the following approach, which is based upon 9J- 5.0055, Florida Administrative Code: (a) Adding together: i. Total design capacity of existing facilities operating at the required LOS; ii. Total design capacity of new facilities that will become available concurrent with the impact of the development and/or change of use; iii. Total design capacity of new facilities under construction at the time of CO approval; iv. For recreational facilities; total design capacity of new facilities that are the subject of a binding, executed contract for construction of facilities to be completed - within -,one vear- of.the �A the CO is issued; V. For roadway facilities, total design capacity of new facilities that are the subject of a binding, executed contract for construction of facilities to be completed within three years of the time the CO is issued; vi. For roadway facilities, total design capacity for new facilities that have been included in a financially feasible five -year capital improvement program and construction is scheduled for the third year or earlier; vii. Total design capacity for new facilities that are guaranteed at a specific time in an enforceable development agreement, which may include, but is not limited to, development agreements pursuant to Section 163.3220, Florida Statutes, and development orders pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Stat- utes, with construction to' begin within three years of CO issuance for roadway facilities and within one year of CO issuance for recreational facilities; and viii: Total - credits for -an (including-full y exception "exemptions, such as RID concurrency approvals), where the City Commission has granted such an exception, based upon those terms specified in Chapter 163, Florida Stat- utes, and related Florida Administrative Code rules. Supp. No. 2 73 i ` 20 -4.1 SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (b) Subtracting from that number the sum of i. The demand for the service created by existing development, as evidenced by current use; and ii. The demand for the service (by phase or otherwise) that will be created by the anticipated completion of all currently approved developments, includ- ing the subject development under evaluation. (3) Determination of Concurrency. (a) County Concurrency Requirements: Metro-Dade County approval is required via the permit process for all County impact fees which currently include roadway, fire, water, sewer, and public schools, as amended. (b) For Water and Sewage: Concurrency shall be evidenced by the approval .of appropriate County and Florida State agencies for water, sewage, and/or septic tanks. (c) For Solid Waste: Concurrency shall be evidenced by the renewal of contracting with Dade County Public Works. (d) For Drainage: Concurrency shall be. evidenced by compliance with South Florida Building Code standards. (e) For Recreation: Concurrency shall be evidenced by evaluation of population and the park land inventory. (f) For Traffic. Concurrency shall be evidenced by annual evaluation of roadway capacity and available LOS. (4) Calculation by Either City or Applicant. Calculations may be performed either by the applicant or City; the City shall verify all applicant calculations. (5) Concurrency Review Fee. An applicant may be charged a concurrency review deposit. This will be used to defray the cost of the determination of concurrency including any consulting fees; the deposit amount shall be defined in the City's Fee Schedule. (E) Concurrency Rights Reservation and Effective Period. (1) Capacity Reservation. Permits shall be chronologically logged upon approval to determine reserved capacity. (2) Reservation Period. Capacity is considered as reserved until issuance of a CC and/or CO and/or CU for a project. Projects must be completed to preserve any concurrency reservation. Otherwise, whenever development permits issued for projects expire, then concurrency approvals expire with the permits. (3) Extensions. An extension of six months may be granted by the City Manager (or a designee) if the applicant presents in writing the circumstances for an extension. Applicants may appeal the City Manager's decision to the City Commission. (4) Development Agreements: Development agreements, as described in Chapter 163.3220, "Florida Local Government Development Agreement Act" [Florida Statutes], shall have a valid concurrency period not to exceed five (5) years or as extended by mutual consent of the City Commission and the applicant. (Ord. No. 7 -96 -1607, § 1, 5 -7 -96) Supp. No. 2 74 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING BOARD Regular Meeting Action Summary Minutes Monday, September 27, 2004 City Commission Chambers 7:30 P.M. EXCERPT I. Call to Order and the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag Action: The meeting was called to order at 7:38 P.M. Action: The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison. II. Roll Call Action: Mr. Morton, Chairperson, requested a roll call. Board members present constituting a quorum: Mr. Morton, Ms. Gibson, Ms. Yates, Mr. Liddy, Mr. Comendeiro, Mr. Illas, and Mr. Mann. Board members absent: None City staff present: Don O'Donniley (Planning Director), Sanford A. Youkilis (Planning Consultant), Brian Edney (Video Support), and Patricia E. Lauderman (Planning Board Secretary). III. Planning Board Applications / Public Hearings Chairman Mr. Morton swore in speakers PB -04 -015 (A) Applicant: Codina Development Corp. Location : 6600 -6640 SW 57th Avenue and 5757 SW 68th Street AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO A REQUEST TO Planning Board Meeting September 27, 2004 AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY CHANGING THE ZONING USE DISTRICT FROM "TODD(MU -4) ", TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (MIXED USE -4) TO "PUD -M" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MIXED USE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6600 -6640 SW 57 AVENUE AND 5757 SW 68 STREET; THE PURPOSE OF THE ZONE CHANGE IS TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A MIXED USE PROJECT CONSISTING OF MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, RETAIL USES AND A PARKING GARAGE; SETTING FORTH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RELATED TO THE DETERMINATION OF CONCURRENCY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ACTION: Mr. Mann read the item into record. Mr. O'Donniley presented the staff report. Mr. O'Donniley stated that the applicant is requesting a rezoning of a seven acre property as legally described above in order to construct a mixed use project including residential buildings, parking and retail uses with 409 dwelling units and 12,476 square feet of commercial space. According to the information submitted with the application, the dwelling unit density will be 58.4 units per acre. The floor area ratio for the total proposed project is listed as 1.54. The complex is be called "Red Road Commons ". He explained the current zoning on the subject property is "TODD(MU -4)" Transit Oriented Development District (Mixed -Use 4) Use District. The applicant is requesting a zone change for the property to PUD -M, Planned Unit Development - Mixed Use. The current TODD(MU -4) Zoning District permits residential and commercial uses, permits two stories in height and does not limit development with a maximum floor area ratio or units per acre formula. Mr. O'Donniley informed the Board that the Planned Unit Development (PUD) submission is to be considered in two parts. The first is a zone map change ordinance, which creates the PUD -M on the City's official map. Issues such as density, compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, traffic, parking requirements, height of buildings, and concurrency are dealt with as part of the zone map change. The second part is the applicant's request for approval by resolution of the PUD master site plan. Specific issues related to building design, landscaping, and other site plan features are dealt with in a companion item. In addition, Mr. O'Donniley provided the following development analysis of the proj ect: 1. The LDC requires that an application for a PUD -M shall be for a project which is on a site of at least 4 acres. The subject application is on a seven acre site. In addition the development site must be within 1200 feet of the Metro Rail station. The applicant states that the project site is 1092 feet from the Metro Rail station. Planning Board Meeting September 27, 2004 2. The PUD -M allows a limited number of uses which are listed in Section 20 -3.7 (E) of the LDC. It includes retail establishments and multi- family residential uses being proposed by the developer. 3. The Red Road Commons project is an excellent opportunity for the City to encourage affordable housing to be built. The developer should be required to commit at least 5% of the units as affordable housing units. 4. In order to meet concurrency for recreational facilities the developer must specify in a development agreement that within five years he will pay for or produce 3.7 acres of land for public park or recreational purposes. Mr. O'Donniley then reviewed a formula that can be used to determine the concurrency costs. 5. The proposed rezoning is consistent with and supports the goals and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan. ( See No. 1, Development Analysis above). 6. A residential development at this location would take full advantage of being adjacent to the transit station and within walking distance of shops, post office, hospitals, restaurants and other amenities of the downtown area. The use would also provide a transition between lower density residential to the north and commercial development to the south. 7. The property is located in the Community Redevelopment Area. The rezoning is consistent with the goals and objectives of the CRA and the "Hometown Plan Area 2 Report", which calls for mixed use development on this site. (p.33) 8. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the recommendations of the Zoning Task Force for this site. In 2002 the Task Force's subcommittee on TODD carried out considerable study on the district. 9. The traffic pattern from a residential development is generally more dispersed through out the day and night and has less impact on peak traffic. Traffic analysis of the current commercial development as compared with the traffic that will be generated by the proposed residential development, indicates that the proposed land use change may actually reduce peak hour vehicle trips generated by this property. However, certain traffic operations and management adjustments will be addressed in the review of the resolution approving the master site plan. The Chairman then called upon the applicant to make a presentation. (Applicant's representative) Mr. Jerry Proctor, Esq Mr. Axis Garcia (Architect) Mr. Marcel Morlote Mr. Tim Plummer Mr. Jeremy Shapiro Planning Board Meeting September 27, 2004 Mr. Proctor began his presentation on the request for rezoning and plan approval of a Planned Unit Development (Mixed -Use) Development for the address 6600- 6640 S.W. 57 Avenue (Red Road and 5757 S.W. 68 Street. He added that Codina Development Corporation ( "Codina" ), the prospective developer requests a district boundary change from TODD (MU -4) to Planned Unit Development Mixed -Use (PUD -M), and concurrent site plan approval for development of the property. Furthermore, he stated that the PUD -M Zoning District encourages complementary combinations of uses, including multi - family residential and commercial uses, within 1,200 feet from any Metro -rail Station. He also indicated that the proposed site plan features considerable pedestrian access and a reduced intensity of development along SW 66 Street, adjacent to the residential community to the north. The proposed intensity of development is compatible with the surrounding area, which included the large FPL transmission facility to the west, retail and industrial zoning and development to the south and southwest, and the higher - intensity apartment and Metro -rail facilities in the area. Mr. Aris Garcia the architect for "Red Road Commons," explained to the Board in- depth the project's PUD submittal. He presented the site plan and zoning analysis, numerous comprehensive floor plans, elevations and survey. Mr. Morton then opened the Public Hearing. Speakers: NAME ADDRESS SUPPORT /OPPOSE David Tucker 6556 SW 78th Ter. Supported Mr. Tucker believed that this project can be beneficial to the community and that the City will make this project work. Jay Beckman 6520 SW 65 St. - Mr. Beckman stated his concern for the protection of green space in South Miami. Rev. Gregory Gay, Sr. 6461 SW 59th Place Supported Mr. Gay, Sr. agreed with the project and was looking forward to having it in the community. Ed. O'Reilly 6640 SW 48 St. Opposed Mr. O'Reilly opposed the application and did not support this project because of the potential influx of traffic. Larry Kelly - Supported Mr. Kelly supported the application and believed that the project would benefit a lot of people in terms of work for the residents in the area. Yvonne Beckman 5871 SW 83rd St. Opposed Ms. Beckman did not agree with the building heights of the proposed project. Planning Board Meeting September 27, 2004 Beth Schwartz 6931 SW 62nd Ct. Opposed Ms. Schwartz urged the Board to consider the traffic build -up that may be caused by this project and did not agree with the building heights for the project. Mr. Morton closed the Public Hearing. Motion: Mr. Comendeiro made a motion to recommend approval of the rezoning request, subject to the following four staff conditions: (1) The applicant shall execute a development agreement which must include the conditions set forth below and in the staff report pertaining to the requested zone map change and shall incorporate all conditions which may be adopted as part of the approval of the project's PUD master site plan (the PUD Master Site Plan is a separate item to be adopted by resolution) (2) The applicant shall include in the development agreement: (a) an agreement that within five years the developer will pay for or produce 3.7 acres of land for public park or recreational purposes. (see attached recreational concurrency formula); (b) an agreement that 5% of the multi - family units constructed shall be classified and marketed as affordable housing units. (3) The applicant shall provide evidence of concurrency compliance by submitting to the city the appropriate documents needed to prove concurrency with water, sewerage, schools, and solid waste. (4) The applicant shall provide to the city a unity of title document for the subject development site; the unity of title shall be prepared and filed in accordance with Section 20 -5.16 of the South Miami Land Development Code. Ms. Yates seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes 6 Nays 1 (Mr. Illas ) SPORTS WHAT YOU CAN DO Listings are considered for publication free of charge on a space- available basis with preference given to nonprofit organizations, benefits and free activities. Notices must be received at least two weeks before.the publication date or your event's registration deadline. Listings must contain a local or toll -free phone number for the public to contact and any fees. Mail notices to: Calendar Desk - Newsroom, The Herald, l Herald Plaza, Miaroi, FL 33132 -1693 or e-mail to: newscalendar @herald.com (with name and date of event on subject line). For questions, call 305- 376 -3355 from 10 a.m. to 6 -p.m, weekdays. BASEBALL RUNNING /WALKING Little League Registration Ages Charity Poker 5KWalkathon:.. . 5.18; through Feb. 12; Miami Springs Benefits Little Brothers - Friends of the Recreation Center, 1401 Westward Elderly; 10:15 a.m. Feb. 12; Miami Ever- . Dr.; Miami Springs; $85 -90. glades, 20686 SW 162nd Ave., Miami; 305-805 -5075 or 305- 905 -6865. $12.305 -969- 9299. Miami Muckdogs: Travel team for The Fun Run 5K: Sponsored by the players 12 and under is looking for Marian Center PTA; 7:30 a.m. Feb. 5; experienced pitchers and players to Marian Center School & Services, try out. Call Billy Hein at 15701 NW 37th Ave, Miami Gardens; 305- 300 -1367. $25:305- 200 -8927, ext. 213. _. SOCCER FOOTBALL 11 on 11 Coed Adult Soccer Coed Four on Four Flag Football 'Registration: Ages 21 and older; Registration: For ages 18 and older, through Jan. 25 for recreational divi- through Feb. 10; Ransom Everglades, sion and Feb. 15 for competitive; Ken- 3735 Main Hwy., Coconut Grove; $65 dall Soccer Park, 8011 SW 127th Ave., for individuals,3475 for teams. - Kendall; $75 for individuals, $1000for - 305- 668.1542 orwww.tmssc.com. teams. 305-668-1542 or Nike Speed, Agility and Quickness www.tmssc.com. Camps: Professional football training Women's Soccer League Registra- camp open to all high school football tion: All female six vs. six Sunday soc- players; free. Coaches and players cer program; Palmer Park, 6100 SW who wish to register, should call Wes- 67th Ave., South Miami; $60 for indi- ley Frater at 954.382-9832: viduals. 305 -665 -1569 or www.mia • 7 -9 p.m. Feb. 6, Feb.15, Feb. 22 and mipremlersoccer.com. March l; Traz Powell Stadiuin, Miami- Dade Community College, North Campus, 11380 NW 27th Ave., Miami. -SOFTBALL 'Canes and Gators: Co -ed softball INLINE SKATING showdown featuring graduates from the University of Florida and the Uni- Sobe- Rollers Ponce - Escorted Skate varsity of Miamii; it a.m. Feb. 19; Tropi- Tour: Skate covers 10 -12 miles of cal Park, 7900 SW 40th St., East Miami Beach with multiple water .Miami -Dade. 305- 866.5047. stops; skaters must wear helmets and Scoreboard Activities: Registering should bring their own water; after- adult men for the upcoming softball . wards skaters are invited on a speed . night season; games are played Sun- skate to downtown Miami or to days; Tamiami Park, 11201 SW 24th gather with other skaters for dinner; 7 St., West Miami -Dade; $535 per team. p.m. Feb. 4; Miami Beach Community 786- 443.0720 or tledo4ll @aol.com. Center, 2100 Washington Ave., Miami Beach; free. 305 866 -2649 or www.soberollers.com. TENNIS Junior USA Team Tennis: Ages 6-18. MARTIAL ARTS Team tennis competition program offered to boys and girls of all skill Aikido ClassesdEveryone is welcome; levels. Sanctioned by the United 7-8:30 m. Monday, Tuesday, Thurs- States Tennis Association; through day; Atelier, 3863 Shipping Ave., April 30; Tropical Park, 7900 SW Coral'Gables; $65 a month. 40th St., East Miami -Dade; $75,$ 60- 786- 346 -3618 or www.alkispirit.com. USTA members. 305- 460 -8002. Alper Jewish Community Center: Tennis After School Program: Open to all levels. Focuses on proper Funded by a grant from The Chil- technique to hit both heavy and dren's Trust, the programis for chil- speed bags while incorporating calls - dren 7 -17. It requires minimum atten- thenics,jumping rope and agility dance of three days per week; skills; 4:30 -6 p.m. Tuesdays; 6:45 -8 3:30- 6;30 p.m., Monday-Fridays, p.m., 9:30- midnight Thursdays; 11155 through June 3; Ashe - Buchholz Ten- SW 112th. Ave., Miami; $15 per class or nis Center at Moore Park, 756 NW $150 for 11 classes. 305. 271 -9000, 36th St., Miami; free. 305-637-1061. ekt.284. Martial Arts: Aikido self defense classes for adults and teens; 8:30- OTHERSPORTS 9:45 p.m. Monday, Tuesday and Thursday; On Your Toes Gymnastics eXtreme Miami Sports Club: Center, 2721 SW 137th Ave., West Two -to -five events per month; rock ' Miami-Dade. 305-632-3075 or troy climbing, scuba diving, snorkeling, damefalanl.cnm k —leinn r vmn nri fouc nr memhor- CITY OF SOUTH MIA COURTESY NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY given that the City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida will consider legislation listed below pertaining to a,proposed Planned Unit Development Project entitled "Red Road Commons" located at 6600 -6640 SW 57 Avenue and 5757 SW 68 Street. (1) A Discussion Workshop scheduled for Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 7:00 PM; (2) A Public Hearing during a Special City Commission meeting on Wednesday, February 23, 2005 beginning at 7:00 PM. Both the workshop and the public hearing will be held in the City Commission Chambers, South Miami City Hall, 6130 Sunset Drive. The legislation to be considered is as follows: AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY CHANGING THE ZONING USE DISTRICT FROM "TOOD(MU -4) ", TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (MIXED 'USE-4) TO "PUD -M" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - MIXED USE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6600 -6640 SW 57 AVENUE AND 5757 SW 68 STREET; THE PURPOSE OF THE 20NE CHANGE IS TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A MIXED USE PROJECT CONSISTING OF MULTI- FAMILY"RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, RETAIL USES AND A PARKING' GARAGE; SETTING FORTH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RELATED TO THE DETERMINATION OPCONCURRENCY. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A MASTER SITE PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY IN A "PUD- liPLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICT MORE SPECIFICALLY LOCATED AT 6600 -6640 SW 57 AVENUE AND 5757 SW 68 STREET; SETTING FORTH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RELATED TO SITE, TRAFFIC, SIGNAGE, AND URBAN DESIGN ISSUES, AND CONSTRUCTION OF APPROPRIATE PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND LANDSCAPING..' AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO FLORIDA STATE STATUE 163.3221 FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT -MIXED USE PROJECT KNOWN AS RED ROAD COMMONS LOCATED AT 6600 -6640 SW 57 AVENUE AND 5757 SW 68 STREET; THE DEVELOPMENT WILL INCLUDE BUILDINGS OF UP TO FIVE (5) STORIES IN HEIGHT AND THE FOLLOWING USES: UP TO 409 MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS, RETAIL USES, OFFICE USES AND A PARKING GARAGE. SPECIAL NOTE: Pursuant to Florida State Statue 163.3221 interested persons are advised that in addition to the . information set forth above the proposed project will be built on a seven acre tract of land and will have a dwelling unit density of 58.3 units per acre and a floor- area -ratio (FAR) of 1.54. The estimated population density of the project is 132 persons per acre. A copy of the development agreement can be obtained at the South Miami Planning Department at the address shown above. Inquiries concerning this item should be directed to the Planning Department at 305- 663.6326. ALL interested parties are invited to attend and will be heard. Maria M. Menendez City Clerk Pursuant to Florida Statutes 286.0105, the City hereby aftses the public that If a person decides to appeal any decision made by this Board, Agency or Commission with respect to any matter considered at its meeting or hearing, he or she will need a record of the proceedings, and that for such purpose. affected person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which record Includes the testimony and evidence