01-18-05 -Missing Agenda Item 11aCity of South Miami
Community Redevelopment Area
Phase II Plan Supplement-
(HEARING DRAFT)
December 30, 2004
SMCRA BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Mary Scott Russell, Chair
Velma Palmer, Vice Chairperson
Marie Birts- Cooper
Craig Z. Sherar
Dr. Anna Price
Nancy Cobb
Randy Wiscombe
i SMCRA ADVISORY BOARD
Lee Perry, Chair
Roy Pearson
Antoinette Owens
David F. Savers
CITY MANAGER
Maria Davis
j
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT '
Maria Davis, Acting Executive Director
Don O'Donniley, Planning Director
James McCants, Program Coordinator
4
i
i
CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
L
INTRODUCTION AND COMMUNITY FEATURES
1
11.
SELECTED DATA AND ANALYSIS UPDATE
3
A.
LAND USE AND ZONING
3
B.
DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
9
1. POPULATION ESTIMATES AND TRENDS
9
2. HOUSING
11
3. INCOME AND POVERTY RATES
12
4. EDUCATIONAL LEVELS
15
5. EMPLOYMENT AND BUSINESS
15
C.
TRANSPORTATION
16
D.
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
21
111.
CURRENT AND PLANNED PROJECTS
22
A.
MIXED -USE AND RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS
22
B.
STREETSCAPE PROJECTS
25
IV,
COMMUNITY VISIONING
26
V.
RECOMMENDED ACTION PLAN
28
A.
POLICIES AND ADMINISTRATION
28
B.
PROGRAMS
28
C.
PROJECTS
31
VI.
REDEVELOPMENT FINANCE & BUDGET PROJECTIONS
37
A.
INTRODUCTION
37 i
B.
HISTORICAL AND CURRENT REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
37 V
C.
PROJECTED REVENUES
38 f
D.
FIVE YEAR BUDGET ESTIMATES
38
APPENDICIES
A. 2000 United States Census Tables
B. South Miami Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area Profile
C. Maximum Income and Rent levels Established by Florida HUD
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04
DRAFT
CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II LIST OF TABLES & FIGURES
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 2.1: Adopted Future Land Use Designations and Criteria
5
TABLE 2.2: CRA Zoning Category Criteria
7
TABLE 2.3: CRA Zoning and Land Use Conflicts
8
TABLE 5.1: CRA ACTION PLAN SCHEDULE
35
TABLE 6.1: SMCRA Revenue Trends
37
TABLE 6.2; Projected SMCRA Revenues FY 2006 - 2020
38
TABLE 6.3: Five -Year Budget Plan (Preliminary)
39
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1.1: Key Community Features in the CRA Area
2
FIGURE 2.1: Existing Land Use Map -
3
FIGURE 2.2: Adopted Future Land Use Map
4
FIGURE 2.3: CRA Zoning Map
6
FIGURE 2.4: Comparative Racial Profile of Year 2000 Population
10
FIG URE 2.5: Relative Age of Housing Stocks
11
FIGURE 2.6: Median Household Income Comparison
12
FIGURE 2.7: Year 2000 Poverty Status Comparison
13
FIGURE 2.8: Household Percent of Income Spent on Housing by Tenure in CT 76.03
14
FIGURE 2.9. 2000 Educational Attainment in CT 76.03
15
FIGURE 2.10: Existing (1999) CRA Traffic Conditions
17
FIGURE 2.11: Projected (2 010) CRA Traffic Conditions
18
FIGURE 2.12: South Miami Trolley Proposed Route for Fridays & Saturdays
19
FIGURE 2.13: Annual MetroRail Ridership Data - South Miami Station
20
FIGURE 3.1: CRA Mixed -Use and Residential Projects
24
FIGURE 3.2: CRA Street Enhancement Projects
25
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04
DRAFT
I. INTRODUCTION AND COMMUNITY FEATURES
This Plan is a Phase If Supplement to the existing South Miami Community
Redevelopment Plan ( "The Plan "), required through an Interlocal Agreement with
Miami -Dade County. This Phase II Plan must be approved by the County no
later than June 2005 in order to retain CRA designation. All other sections in the
approved 1997 -1998 South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan which are
not updated in this Supplement remain in full force and effect. This Plan
Supplement is based on an extension of the CRA through the year 2020.
The South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency (SMCRA) Redevelopment
Area was approved and designated by Miami -Dade County in 1999 through
Ordinance No. 99 -100. It is composed of approximately 185 acres with a 2004
total taxable value (TTV) of approximately $199,354,475, a 5 year gain of over
$130 million total taxable value (Source: the Miami -Dade County Property
Appraiser's `Office, 12/14/04). This area represents approximately 12.2% of the
overall geographic area of the City of South Miami and 20 %0 of the TTV of all
properties.
As evidenced in Figure 1.1, a number of key community features are located
within or near the Redevelopment Area, including municipal buildings, parks,
hospitals, educational facilities, and shopping centers. These assets should be
utilized to the fullest extent whenever possible and be recognized for their
contribution to the area.
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04
Page 1 DRAFT
CRA PLAN UP DATE PHASE %% %NTRO Ec COMMUN %TY FEATURES
FIGURE 1..1: Key Community Features in the CRA Area
I� ® Marshall Williamson Park JRE Lee Ed Center ® University of Miami
C%TY OF SOUTH NZAMZ, FLOR%®A 12 -30 -04
Page 2 DRAFT
II. SELECTED DATA AND ANALYSIS UPDATE
As evidenced in Figure 2.1, the existing land uses within the South Miami
Community Redevelopment Area are primarily single- family and low- density
multi - family residential to the north; a mix of single - family, multi- family residential,
townhouses, commercial, parks and institutional in the center; and mostly office,
commercial, industrial, utilities, and institutional on the south side. Vacant
parcels are scattered throughout the area.
Earlier this year, a mixed -use development _project called the Valencia was
constructed at 6001 SW 70th Street. The Miami -Dade County's Existing Land
Use map has not been updated to reflect the site's new use so it is depicted in
Figure 2A as being vacant and commercial use.
FIGURE 2.11: Existing Land Use Map
Jource: Miami -Dade County, April 2003
LEGEND
v
'.4V SMCRA BourA
00 # ��'i
e,^
6a ar R.>ads
—'l
I�
dL'� Y {� � r°rti
� 5ngla -Farms
3.0 y
iun R ] 485
:"mow 1.
,Uah.
La DansAy f.WHt•Fartrry.
M1W.trFamly V-Vmnt Can
"b4. H.— Parks
ShaPPmg+:anlers C.M.-al, .
Sladw .T—A4
Olt-
+"`'
�. Transont- Rez7antal
of �<Y"!r
tNV/85�MalaY+i
t
j�.
Ind ,traf Exlru_han
q p 7
.�
1ndu luv _
' 1tl
u
_lnstautronal >
ED
Parks (lnc'ndmg P.—a and
„ x
Cans —tmn)
�. ,`
� CemafetYs
,„c
� h
N A �"
1,:; 4Faler Conaarvalan A:Baa
AipoRS�Ppns
Ca mu —Wns. UfM.;as.
' _
TermnaL . Pants
Sire ts�RaadS E%pr9a4 p,
Ramps
E.P s NPIm.1 W., Open
Are
Agnes Aura
`
Vaca t. Gwa—w O,m l
n=
j I i ii) I
Vawn( l;nArolBCtad
�'� Y; 3 li q t
O 4Vasr
CRA PLAN UPDATE — PHASE IF SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE
Figure 2.2 shows the adopted Future Land Use designations within the CRA,
followed by Table 2.1 below which summarizes the permitted uses and specific
dimensional requirements of the land use designations.
FIGURE 2.2: Adopted Future Land Use Map
Source: City of South Miami, Planning- Zoning, 2004
CITY OF SOUTH MZAMZ, FLDRZDA 12 -30-04
Page 4 DRAFT
CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE
TABLE 2.1: Adopted Futur'P Land ttcp npcinnnfinnc nnri 4 rifnAn
Land Use
Permitted Uses
Maximum
Maximum Height
Designation
Density
Single Family
Single - family house
New parcels =none
2 stories
specified
Ex. parcels =
consistent with
Multi Family
Townhouse, Multi- family,
-surrounding
24du /Ac
4 stories
mixed -use (retail /office on
round level
Mixed Use
Mixed -Use: retail /office/
24du /Ac
4 stories
Commercial
residential
Residential
Transit Oriented
Office, retail, residential,
Same as zoning
Flexible up to 8 stories
Development District
and mixed -use
Residential Office
Very low intensity office
N/A
2 stories
Educational
Public schools
N/A
Average of permitted
heights in the
surrounding zoning
districts, not to exceed 4
stories
Public & Institutional
Public schools, municipal
N/A
4. stories
facilities, utilities,
churches, temples,
synagogue , and similar
Parks & Open Space
Public parks, park and
N/A
N /A
open space area
(including at public
schools
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA
Page 5
12 -30 -04
DRAFT
CRA PLAN UPDATE — PHASE ZI SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE
Figure 2.3 depicts a citywide map of the Zoning Designations with the SMCRA
highlighted. Table 2.2 summarizes the permitted uses and specific dimensional
requirements of the zoning categories within the CRA.
FIGURE 2.3: CRA Zoning Map
Source: City of South Miami, Punning- Zoning, 2004
I
CRA PLAN UPDATE PHASE II SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE
TABLE 2.2: CRA Zoning Category Criteria
Zoning Category
Permitted Uses
Maximum
Maximum
Density
Height
Low Density Residential
Planned Unit Development
None specified
2 stories; 25 ft
(RS -3)
(special use); Single - family
dwelling; Community
Residential home (less than 6);
home occupation
Single Family Residential
Planned Unit Development
None specified
2 stories; 25 ft
(RS-4)
(special use); Single- family
dwelling; Community
Residential home (less than 6);
home occupation
Low Density Multi - Family
Planned Unit Development
18du /Ac
2 stories; 30 ft
Residential (RM -18)
(special use); all other
residential uses
Low Intensity Office (LO)
Low intensity office; limited
N/A
2 stories; 30 ft
business and professional
services
Medium Intensity Office
Medium intensity professional
N/A
4 stories; 50 ft
MO
and business office
Neighborhood Retail (NR)
Limited business and
N/A
2 stories; 25 ft
professional services
Specialty Retail (SR)
Ground floor retail with office
N/A
4 stories; 50 ft
and residential on the upper
floors
Transit Oriented
Development District
TODD
Mixed Use 4 (MU -4)
Residential uses; commercial
Limited only by the
2 stories
uses
earking pro vided
Mixed Use 5 (MU -5)
Residential uses; commercial
Limited only by the
2 stories min.; 4
uses
parking provided
stories max; up to
8 stories with
bonus; 100ft
Light Industrial 4 (LI-4)
Residential uses; commercial
Limited only by the
2 stories
uses; light industrial use
parking provided
Hospital
Hospital (special use);
N/A
None Specified
accessory medical services
(special use); chiro clinic
(special use); labs; medical
offices
Public Institutional
Daycare; municipal uses,
N/A
Compatible with
parks, religious (special use)
surrounding
districts
Parks & Recreation
Parks and open s ace
N/A
N/A
CRA PLAN UPDATE PHASE II SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE
A number of inconsistencies exist between certain zoning district requirements
and those of the corresponding Land Use designations. These will need to be
rectified in order to facilitate redevelopment efforts. The following inconsistencies
have been identified:
TABLE 2.3 CRA Zonin g and Land Use Inconsistencies
Zoning Category
Land Use
Conflict
Designation
Low Density Multi- family
Multi Family Residential
1. Zoning permits density of 18du /Ac;
Residential (RM -18)
Land Use permits density of
24du /Ac
2. Zoning permits 2 stories or 30 ft;
Land Use permits 4 stories
3. Land Use of properties near SW
61st Court is Parks and Open
Space while zoning is RM -18
4. Land Use of properties near SW
62nd Avenue is Public and
Institutional while zoning is RM -18
Neighborhood Retail (NR)
Mixed Use Commercial
1. Zoning does not permit residential
Residential
or mixed -use; Land Use permits
density of 24du /Ac
2. Zoning permits 2 stories or 25 ft;
Land Use permits 4 stories
Low Intensity Office (LO)
Mixed Use Commercial
I. Zoning does not permit residential
Residential
or mixed -use; Land Use permits
density of 24du /Ac
2. Zoning permits 2 stories or 30 ft;
Land Use permits 4 stories
Medium Intensity Office
Mixed Use Commercial
1. Zoning does not permit residential;
(MO)
Residential
Land Use permits density of
24du /Ac
Specialty Retail (SR)
Mixed Use Commercial
1. Zoning does not permit mixed-
Residential
use; Land Use permits density of
24du /Ac
Hospital
Mixed Use Commercial
1. Zoning does not permit residential
Residential
or mixed -use; Land Use permits
density of 24du /Ac
Public Institutional
Educational &
I. Zoning maximum height is
Public and Institutional
determined by what is considered
compatible with surrounding
districts; Land Use permits 4
stories
22 -30 -04
DRAFT
CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE
B. DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
The information contained herein was derived from the 2000 Census Summary
Files 1 and 3. Summary File 1 includes basic demographic and housing
characteristics from the census "short form" which went to all households. This
information is readily available with precision down to the Census Block Level.
Summary File 3 data are from the census "long form" sent to a sample of one -in-
ten households. These data include population, economic, and social measures
and are only available down to the Census Block Group Level. Census data was
compiled at the Census Block Level for most of the population and housing
information contained in this report. ` Because detailed social, economic and
housing information is not available at the Census Block Level, data was also
collected at the Census Block Group and Census Tract Levels. Detailed tables
are located in Appendix A.
The South Miami Community Redevelopment Area consists of a majority of
Census Tract 76.03 (58 %). The Census Block Groups (all within CT 76.03)
include 76.03:04, 76.03 :03 and portions of 76.03:02 (21 %a) and 76.03:01(18 %).
These Block Groups that form Census Tract 76.03 hereafter will be referred to as
"CT 76.03 ". The following Census Blocks comprise the South Miami Community
Redevelopment Area:
76.03:1026 thru 76.03:1033;
76.03:2003;
76.03:2004;
76.03:3000 thru 76.03:3013; and
76.03:4000 thru 76.03:4016.
Additionally, the Miami -Dade County Department of Planning and Zoning
prepared the South Miami Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area Profile in
April of 2003 (See Appendix B). Because the Community Redevelopment Area
includes approximately 98% of this South Miami Target Area, the information
within that-document was of great assistance in the demographic analysis of this
report.
I
1. POPULATION ESTIMATES AND TRENDS
I
The resident population located within the CRA represents 18% of the City of
South Miami's total population. Population growth is as follows:
City of South Miami 1.0 % growth,
Population, 1990 = 10,404
Population, 2000 = 10,741
Redevelopment Area = 1.1 % growth,
Population, 1990 = 1,700 (approximate)
Population, 2000 = 1,951
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04
Page 9 DRAFT
CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE ZZ SELECTED DATA &ANALYSIS UPDATE
The redevelopment area almost entirely consists of a minority community. The
2000 Census figures indicate that 83% of the residents in the South Miami CRA
are Black or African American whereas the City is 25% and County is 20%.
Approximately 13% of the SMCRA residents are White whereas both the City
and County are around 70% White. Figure 2.4 illustrates the racial diversity of
the Redevelopment Area compared to the City and County.
FIGURE 2.4: Comparative Racial Profile of Year 2000 Population
VV /0
2
r- 80%
(060%
0
"o- 40%
i.
W
cL 20%
0%
13 White
0 Black or African American
❑American Indian and Alaska
Native*
13Asian
• NativeL Hawaiian and Other
Pacific Islander*
• Some other race
Miami- Dade South Miami South Miami El Population of two or more
County CRA races
Represents less than .4% of total
population
Source: 2000 Census; Summary File I
The South Miami CRA has a relatively young population. In 2000, about 44% of
the population was below 25 years of age compared to 31 % in the City and 34%
in the County. Approximately 13% were 65 years and over, similar to the City
and County percentages (14% and 13%, respectively).
Family households in the Redevelopment Area were less likely to be comprised
of married couples (21% compared to 40% Citywide and 48% Countywide). The
percent of family households headed by a female householder (20%) was much
higher than the City and County percentages (7% and 9%, respectively).
779
2
10
®r,
711'1�
'�-X
7
. . . . . . . . . . .
0,
1,
7
13 White
0 Black or African American
❑American Indian and Alaska
Native*
13Asian
• NativeL Hawaiian and Other
Pacific Islander*
• Some other race
Miami- Dade South Miami South Miami El Population of two or more
County CRA races
Represents less than .4% of total
population
Source: 2000 Census; Summary File I
The South Miami CRA has a relatively young population. In 2000, about 44% of
the population was below 25 years of age compared to 31 % in the City and 34%
in the County. Approximately 13% were 65 years and over, similar to the City
and County percentages (14% and 13%, respectively).
Family households in the Redevelopment Area were less likely to be comprised
of married couples (21% compared to 40% Citywide and 48% Countywide). The
percent of family households headed by a female householder (20%) was much
higher than the City and County percentages (7% and 9%, respectively).
CRA PLAN UPDATE — PHASE IT SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE
2: HOUSING
In 2000, renter- occupied units accounted for 61% of all occupied units in the
South Miami CRA, higher than both the City (37 %) and the County (42 %).
Vacancy rate for the redevelopment area was 6 %, higher than the City (3 %), but
less than the County (9 %).
The average household size of occupied housing units within CT 76.03 was 2.84,
with an owner- occupied average of 3.62 and renter occupied average of 2.13
persons per household. The average household size of occupied housing units
for the City was 2.47 and the County was 2.84. More than 30% of the households
in CT 76.03 had 4 persons or more living in the household.
As depicted in Figure 2.5, much more of the housing in the City and CT 76.03 is
older than newer. More than 64% of the housing in CT 76.03 is more than 35
years old, compared to 73% in the City of South Miami and 45 % in the County.
FIGURE 2.5: Relative Age of Housing Stocks
® Miami -Dade
County
®South Miami
p CT 76.03
source: zuuu census; summary Hie 3
In 2000, the median housing value for all owner occupied homes in CT 76.03
was less than $100,000, while South Miami was $170,100 and Miami -Dade
County was $124,000. More than 70 % of the owner occupied homes were
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04
Page 11 DRAFT
oil,
PEN,l ,
P//
f
® Miami -Dade
County
®South Miami
p CT 76.03
source: zuuu census; summary Hie 3
In 2000, the median housing value for all owner occupied homes in CT 76.03
was less than $100,000, while South Miami was $170,100 and Miami -Dade
County was $124,000. More than 70 % of the owner occupied homes were
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04
Page 11 DRAFT
CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE
valued at 'less than $70,000 in CT 76.03, compared to 5% for the City and 8.6%
for the County:
3. INCOME AND POVERTY RATES
Median household income in the Redevelopment Area is considerably less than
that of the City and County as evidenced in Figure 2.6. In fact, more than 62%
of the households within the SMCRA Census Block Groups had incomes below
$35,000, compared to 39% in South Miami and 42% in Miami -Dade County.
FIGURE 2.6: Median Household Income Comparison
CRA PLAN UPDATE — PHASE II SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE
Figure 2.7 depicts the percent of total population that falls below and at or above
poverty level. With more than 32% of the population falling below poverty level,
poverty is clearly a major issue in the Redevelopment Area compared to the City
(17 %) and the County (18 %).
FIGURE 2.7: Year 2000 Poverty Status Comparison
,
Source: 2000 Census; Summary File 3
The median monthly gross rent for renter- occupied housing units within CT 76.03
was $570, far below the median monthly gross rent of the City ($ 672) and
County ($ 647). Of particular note is that all 144 renter - occupied housing units in
South Miami with cash rent less than $300 a month are located within CT 76.03.
A significant number of renter households in the Redevelopment Area are paying
a considerable amount of their income on gross rent compared to those in the
City and County. Nearly 42% of the specified renter households in CT 76.03 are
paying more than 30% of their income on housing, compared to 39% of the
households in the City and 47% of the households the County. j
i
Nearly 38% of the owned households (with and without a mortgage) in the Tract
are paying more than 30% of their income on housing, compared to 33% for the
City and 37% for the County.
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04
Page 13 DRAFT
CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE ZZ SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE
As shown in Figure 2.8, a significant number of households within CT 76.03
spend more than 30% of their income on housing, particularly rental households.
FIGURE 2.8: Household Percent of Income Spent on Housing by Tenure in
CT 76.03
CRA PLAN UPDATE — PHASE II SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE
4. EDUCATIONAL LEVELS
The educational attainment levels of the redevelopment area's residents continue
to lag behind the regional levels. In 2000, nearly 36 %of the population age 25
and older within CT 76.03 never graduated high school while 18% in the City and
32 %° in the County did not graduate. 15% had completed four or more years of
college compared to 38 % in South Miami and 22% in Miami -Dade County.
Figure 2.9 shows the educational attainment breakdown within CT 76.03. 63%
of the total 25 and older population within this area does not have college
experience.
FIGURE 2.9: 2000 Educational Attainment in CT 76.03
Source: 2000 Census; Summary File 3
S. EMPLOYMENT AND BUSINESS
In 2000, 6% of the labor force in CT 76.03 was unemployed, slightly higher than
the City and County figures (4% and 5% respectively). About 48% of area
residents over 16 were not in the labor force, i.e., neither employed _nor looking
for work, compared to South Miami's 36% and Miami - Dade's 43 %.
The ability of a; household to own a vehicle is a significant indicator of an area's
level of distress. According to the 2000 Census, 29% of the occupied
households within CT 76.03 do not own a vehicle, with over 20% being renter-
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12- 30 -04
Page 15 DRAFT
CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE
occupied. Only 12% of the occupied households in the City and 14% in the
County do not own a vehicle. Furthermore, occupied households that own 2 or
more vehicles comprise only 19% of the area, compared to 36 % in the City and
35% in the County. These figures illustrate the importance of reliable public
transportation to the community within the redevelopment area.
C. TRANSPORTATION
As indicated in Figure 2.10, the major traffic corridors transecting the South
Miami CRA including Sunset Drive, Red Road, and South Federal
Highway /South Dixie Highway are currently operating at or below LOS E. Figure
2.11 depicts that traffic congestion conditions will continue to worsen by Year
2010. However, Miami -Dade County has adopted LOS 'standards that allow
roadways within the Urban Infill Area to operate at 150 %® of their capacity
because of the presence of extraordinary transit. This was enacted to promote
infill development and discourage suburban sprawl. In the 1998 South Miami
Community Redevelopment Plan, it was anticipated that the advent of the
MetroRail stop at the South Miami station and the City of South Miami's adoption
of the Transit Oriented Development ordinance in 1997 would help relieve some
of the traffic pressures in the area, however traffic congestion remains to be a
serious issue for the SMCRA.
Certain measures to promote the use of alternative modes of transportation have
been proposed to help alleviate traffic congestion in the CRA. As an initiative of
The People's Transportation Plan, -a Trolley System is being implemented to
provide transportation services within the business district, Community
Redevelopment Area, City Hall, and Metrorail Station. Funding is proposed to be
earmarked from the half -penny transportation surtax, approved by Miami -Dade
County voters in 2002. This service is tentatively set to begin operations on
January 2, 2005, on Fridays and Saturdays and the First Sunday of each month.
Figure 2.12 shows the tentative route.
The Miami -Dade MetroRail Transit station located within the CRA is South Miami
Station. As depicted in Figure 2.13, annual ridership at this station was at an all -
time low of 701,460 riders in 1998. Since then, annual ridership has averaged
nearly 840,000 riders, though not through a steady growth trend.
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04
Page 16 DRAFT
CRA PLAN UPDATE — PHASE IX SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE
FIGURE 2.10: Existing (1999) CRA Traffic Conditions
LOS S or better-+
• LOS C
LOS Q
LOS E
g LOS r
CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE
FIGURE 2.11: Projected (2010' CRA Traffic Conditions
Source: Miami -Dade MPO, 2004
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04
Page 18 DRAFT
. __..._ .....................
CRA PLAN UPDATE — PHASE II SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE
FIGURE 2.12: South Miami Trolley Proposed Route for Fridays & Saturdays
auurce: owin imami t -UDI1C VVOrKS uepanment, 1U /Z9 /ZUU4
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04
Page 19 DRAFT
CRA PLAN UPDATE PHASE II SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE
FIGURE 2.13: Annual MetroRail Ridership Data - `South Miami Station
CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE
D. AFFORDABLE HOUSING
The Plan indicated that from 1980 to 1990, existing housing units in the City of
South Miami decreased by a total of 162 units. Census information reveals that
the number of existing housing units in the City rebounded about 3 % between
1990 to 2000. Similarly, the redevelopment area has seen few new housing
units constructed until recently.
Given the redevelopment area's unusually high poverty level, the large amount of
households spending a significant percentage of their income on housing,
predominantly older low -value housing availability, " and influx of new service
oriented jobs associated with recent retail development, the construction of new
affordable housing alternatives should be a vital mission for the SMCRA.
Of primary concern is that new "affordable" housing in the area be offered for rent
or sale at a rate that the current residents can afford. In general terms,
"affordable housing" is dependent upon an income eligible household's ability to
spend no more than 30% of its income on either rent or mortgage payment.
Income eligibility is defined in terms of area median income (determined by
HUD), adjusted for family size. Categories include "extremely low- income" (at or
below 30% of area median income), "very low- income" (at or below 50% of
median income), "low - income" (at or below 80% of median income), and
"moderate income" (at or below 120% of area median income; at or below 100%
of median income for federal programs),
Appendix C depicts the Florida Housing Finance Corporation's 2004 Income
Limits Adjusted to Household Size for Miami PMSA used to establish income
eligibility and 2004 Maximum Gross Rents by Number of Bedrooms used to
establish the rent schedule for each income eligibility category. The 2004
median income for the Miami PMSA is $45,400. Using the charts in Appendix
C, it can be derived that in order for for -rent housing to qualify as affordable in
the CRA it would need to fall within the range of $275 /month for an efficiency for
an "extremely low- income" household to $1,833 /month fora 4- bedroom unit for a
"moderate income household. The most predominant housing size, the 3-
bedroom unit, ranges from $410 for an "extremely low- income" household to
$1,644 for "moderate income" household. "
12 -30 -04
DRAFT
Ill. CURRENT AND PLANNED PROJECTS
A. MIXED -USE AND RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS
The following projects are either completed, planned or recommended mixed -use
or residential projects. Figure 3.1 depicts their location.
Madison Square
Madison Square is a SMCRA mixed -use redevelopment proposal intended to
create an anchor for the north end of the Church Street (a current streetscape
improvement project) and to help stimulate revitalization efforts in the area. The
City currently owns several of the parcels and is presently assembling the
remaining properties. As identified in Table 2.3, there are inconsistencies
between the height and density requirements of the Zoning district
(Neighborhood Retail) and Land Use designation (Mixed -Use Commercial
Residential). Furthermore, while the Land Use designation allows mixed -use
development, the Zoning district does not. There issues will need to be resolved
prior to redevelopment. Once all of the properties are under City ownership, an
RFP will be issued for the construction phase.
The Valencia
The Valencia Apartment Homes, developed by Realty Development Corporation,
the multifamily development arm of The Lane Company, is a $40 million 290+
unit luxury, mid -rise apartment community plus 6,200 square feet of retail space.
Construction commenced winter 2002, with the first units available for occupancy
in February 2004.
Hometown Station
The Hometown Station, developed by Jubilee C.D.C. in association with
Masvidal Partners and Permanentia, Inc., is a $16.5 million mid -rise mixed -use
infill development complex on the Metrorail site. Phase l of the planned project
will consist of an 8 -story office building (160,000 square feet) which will house
the County's Housing Agency, 4,000 square feet of retail use and 10 live /work
apartment units, attached to the existing Metro -rail parking garage. Phase II will
include residential and /or office uses. The development has numerous
objectives including new residential development initiatives targeted at local
minority- owned businesses, Increased ridership on the Metrorail line, and
positive enhancement of the City of South Miami. The first phase of the project is
currently under construction. As identified in Table 2.3, the Land Use
designation (Mixed -Use Commercial Residential) allows mixed -use development
however the zoning district (Public Institutional) does not. This will need to be
resolved prior to the redevelopment of future phases. Some concerns have been
raised about whether future phases will be developed.
CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II CURRENT AND PLANNED PROJECTS
South Miami Gardens
South Miami Gardens is a planned 7 acre+ public housing project owned and
operated by Miami -Dade County. This project is currently in the design and
feasibility stage. As identified in Table 2.3, inconsistencies between the height
and density requirements of the Zoning (RM -18) and Land Use designation
( Multiple - Family Residential) will need to be resolved prior to redevelopment.
NE CRA Mixed -Use Site
A planned private sector development project has been proposed for this 7 acre+
site located in the TODD zoning district with these development parameters:
400+ market rent dwelling units and approximately 12,000 square feet of ground
floor retail including a 1,000 space parking structure. It has been recommended
by the City that any development agreement for this site include provisions that
the applicant pay for or produce adequate park land or land for recreational
purposes to satisfy the impact of development and that of least 5 percent of the
multi- family units constructed will be classified and marketed as affordable
housing units.
Hardee Courts
Hardee Courts is a recommended redevelopment project located on
approximately one acre. The December 2001 CRA Multi- Family Housing Study
suggested rowhouses for this site, which is inconsistent with the Zoning and
Land Use limitation of single- family dwellings. This will need to be resolved prior
to redevelopment.
Hardee Gateway
Hardee Gateway is a recommended redevelopment project located on less than
one acre. The December 2001 CRA Multi- Family Housing Study suggested
townhouses and limited retail uses for this site, which is inconsistent with the
Zoning and Land Use limitation of single - family dwellings. This will need to be
resolved prior to redevelopment.
Central Place
Central Place is a recommended redevelopment project located on
approximately 1.67 acres. This projects was first recommended in the December
2001 CRA Multi- Family Housing Study and proposes half of the site for multi-
family housing and the other for retail including a 13,000 square foot mini - grocery
store.
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04
Page 23 DRAFT
CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II CURRENT AND PLANNED PROJECTS
FIGURE 3.1: CRA Mixed -Use and Residential. Projects
II
CRA PLAN UPDATE — PHASE ZZ CURRENT AND PLANNED PROJECTS
B. STREETSCAPE PROJECTS
A number of streetscape enhancements have been proposed for the CRA by the
City, the County, or as a requirement of private sector development approval. A
couple of the major projects are shown in Figure 3.2.
FIGURE 3.2: CRA Street Enhancement Projects
MIN
Source: City of South Miami, Plan ninq- Zoning. 2004
SW 62nd Avenue
(County initiative)
® SW 59" Place /Church
Street
Dashed indicates planned
projects; hatched indicates
completed projects
IV. COMMUNITY VISIONING
On November 18, 2004, a South Miami Community Redevelopment Area
Workshop was held to discuss redevelopment issues and help develop a unified
vision for the area. A following outline summarizes the key issues and comments
that were mentioned by the CRA Board and community at this meeting.
SMCRA Community Workshop Key issues and Comments
➢ Affordable Housing
• Provide more single - family homes
• Improve the homes on SW 64th Street
• Ensure there is ample housing for any households displaced due to
new construction
• Provide more multi- family housing
• Ensure a variety of housing types are developed (townhouses,
duplexes, etc)
• Require a percentage of affordable housing with commercial
development
• Identify affordable housing opportunities, such as the corner of SW
58th Street and SW 68th Ave, and the Destiny Lots (5)
• Low income housing is needed, not just affordable
➢ Economic Development and Business Incentives
• Ensure that programs are affordable
• - Encourage private development
• Actively demolish and clear lots as an incentive for redevelopment
• Investigate the option of purchasing South Miami Market
• Continue the Business Incubator Program
• Provide incentives to attract a grocery store chain to locate in the
area
• Explore more public /private partnerships
• The Mobley Building should be a Business Incubator
Infrastructure Improvements
• Provide adequate parking facilities
• Provide a municipal parking garage, specifically at Sunset Place
• Provide infrastructure improvements
➢ Public Safety
o Enhance public safety ,
➢ Education
• Daycare centers are lacking in the area
• Support the re- opening of J.R.E. Lee School
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04
Page 26 DRAFT
CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II COMMUNITY VISIONING
• New Business Education Program
• Teach home ownership training and warn against "predatory"
lending practices
➢
Tax Base Growth
• Ensure greater accountability of CRA revenues
• Look at Bonding as an option for financing improvements
• Ensure area continues growth trend
➢
Traffic and Transit
o Improve the traffic flow
➢
Enhance Bike and Pedestrian Connectivity
• Make the area more pedestrian friendly with connections, lighting,
and trees
• Designate paths to the Metrorail with adequate pedestrian lighting
• Provide a sidewalk on one side of SW Progress Road and
Commerce Lane
➢
Job Training
o Continue Job Training Program
➢
Land Use and Zoning
• Resolve a potential conflict between the commercial zoning in the
area and specific retail uses
• Ensure consistency with the Comprehensive Plan
• Preserve the single-family zoning per the Comprehensive Plan
➢
Community Design
0 Improve Market Corner with uniform street furniture, coordinated
lighting, less pavement, and landscaping.
o Improve Commerce Lane
o Investigate non - matching residential rehab programs
➢
Financial Management
o Provide programs for mortgage counseling / education
➢
General Comments
• Ensure public review /accessibility to the Final Plan
• Prioritize programs and strategies
• Use the East Area as an example of what the CRA wants to
become
• Do not let the South Miami CRA sunset as the South Beach CRA
did
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04
Page 27 DRAFT
V. RECOMMENDED ACTION PLAN
The following policies, programs and projects were developed to serve as the
Action Plan for future redevelopment in the CRA. They were drawn from existing
SMCRA strategies and projects, existing CRA conditions, CRA Goals contained
in the adopted Plan and public workshop visioning input. The policies, programs
and projects presented below a-e summarized in Table 5.1, The Action Plan
Schedule.
A. POLICIES AND ADMINISTRATION
1. Ensure land Use and Zoning Consistency
a. Process land use amendments, as necessary, to eliminate
inconsistencies with planned CRA projects. Incorporate into EAR-
based amendments in years 2005 -06.
b. Process zoning applications, as necessary, to correct any
inconsistencies with the Comprehensive Plan land use map and /or
planned CRA projects. First priority is Madison Square area.
C. Evaluate the appropriateness of revising the City Zoning Code to
require a minimum percentage set.- aside ` of affordable housing
residential units for mixed use and multi - family projects located in
the CRA.
d. Develop community design guidelines for the CRA area and adopt
into the City's Zoning Code.
2. Maintain Proper CRA Staffing
a. Retain and stabilize the full -time CRA Executive Director position.
b. Continue Program Coordinator position and retain 2 part -time
college students.
C. Out- source technical services such as planning, design and
engineering. Utilize City resources to maximum extent possible.
B. PROGRAMS
1. Commercial Facade Program: Assist local businesses to upgrade
business facades
a. Provide an 'average of up to 3 commercial facade loans /grants per
year. (maximum amount $20,000 each)
b. Target Church St., Sunset Drive (north side) and Commerce Lane /
Progress Road areas for fagade upgrades.
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12- 30-04
Page 28 DRAFT
CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II RECOMMENDED ACTION PLAN
2. Neighborhood In- fill: Acquire selected lots for single - family detached
and townhouse development.
a. Work with qualified non- profit housing agencies such as Habitat for
Humanities and Greater Miami Neighborhoods.
b. Continue to identify and acquire eligible lots. An average of 5 lots
per year should be developed.
C. Update the vacant land and abandoned buildings inventory
annually.
3. Residential Rehabilitation:
a. Solicit and select applications for neighborhood rehabilitation
projects.
b. Fund an average of 6 projects per year to completion.
4. Residential Paint/Fix -up:
a. Supply materials /volunteer labor to renters /homeowners to paint
and fix buildings, and install landscaping.
b. Provide 5 (material) grants per year @ average of $2,500 per grant.
5. Enhanced Public Safety / Code Enforcement:
a. Continue employment of extra police officer and additional Code
Enforcement officer for this area.
b. Keep annual statistics on all crime types for CRA area to document
performance of program to County and CRA Board.
C. Continue aggressive code enforcement program especially
properties with absentee landlords. Place and enforce liens for
noncompliance. Match code cases with CRA programs such as
commercial /residential rehabilitation and paint/fix up.
6. Scholarship Work/Study:
a. Continue the Agency's program in this area by retaining 2 college
students from the CRA area to work as part -time employees for the
CRA or agencies doing work within the CRA, primarily during the
summer months.
7. Job Identification, Matching and Training:
a. Maintain and update on a monthly basis a list of eligible
unemployed CRA residents to provide to the County -wide
Workforce Coalition, area contractors, and companies locating in
the CRA area for employment opportunities.
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04
Page 29 DRAFT
CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II RECOMMENDED ACTION PLAN
b. Assist CRA residents with basic educational and /or specific job
skills through the Workforce agency, University of Miami or other
job training resources.
C. Currently there is a community need for persons in the health
service industry, including nurses 'and medical assistants. Work
with Larkin Hospital and South Miami Hospital to facilitate training
and possible employment at those institutions, and other clinics and
medical offices in the area.
d. Prepare an analysis of the daycare and after school care needs in
the `CRA area. If significant needs are identified, encourage the
location of new daycare centers and help existing centers expand
through flexible zoning and /or financial incentives
8. Business Attraction and Start -up Assistance:
a. Provide interest -free loans to business start -ups and expanding
small businesses in the CRA area. Maximum 3 -year term loans of
up to $5,000 for each new job to be created.
b. Seek a small -scale neighborhood market for location in the CRA
area.
C. Work with the Beacon Council and local Chamber of Commerce to
attract new businesses to the CRA area.
9. Mortgage Subsidy Guarantees:
a. Working with local non- profits and banking institutions, provide a
funding _pool to serve a "gap financing" for first time homebuyers
and other eligible persons in residing in the CRA. Funding will be
the form of "soft second" mortgages with repayment to the CRA
when the unit is sold. No such mortgage should exceed 5 % of
purchase price.
b. An average of 4 or more applications per year should be approved
and implemented within budgetary constraints.
10. Education:
a. Work with the County School Board to accelerate the priority of re-
opening J.R.E. Lee School as an elementary school.
11. "Friendly Green Streets" Bikeway and Pedestrian Plan:
a. If not addressed in the forthcoming Evaluation and Appraisal
Report (E.A.R.), develop a CRA -wide Friendly Green Streets Plan
which interconnects with areas outside the CRA and fills in the
gaps in the bikeway and sidewalk system within the CRA.
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04
Page 30 DRAFT
CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II RECOMMENDED ACTION PLAN
b. The E.A.R. and /or Plan should also assess the feasibility of
narrowing the pavement on selected residential streets, such a SW
66th Street, to provide more area for bikeways, sidewalks, medians
and street trees. Identify a street tree palette for the CRA.
C. In FY 2007, allocate $50,000 for development of the Plan with cost
estimates or construction of facilities. Seek County and State grant
funds to help offset costs.
d. Program construction funding in future years based on cost
estimates provided by the approved E.A.R. and /or Plan.
12. Pedestrian Street Lighting Program:
Provide decorative, "soft" pedestrian lighting With sufficient intensity to
make pedestrians feel secure and able to see well at nighttime rather than
high- intensity amber (crime) lighting as follows:
a. Add additional lighting at Marshall Williamson Park.
b. Provide new or enhanced lighting at all intersections in the CRA.
C. Designate well - lighted paths accessing the MetroRail Station.
C. PROJECTS
1. Mobley Building:
a. Feasibility of using entire building as a business incubator should
be evaluated, possibly in partnership with an academic institution
such as the University of Miami.
b. If business incubator is not feasible, provide space (1 -4 bays) for
non- profit and /or social services agencies such as community
health clinic, job training, employment services, after school care
and /or full - service daycare.
C. If space is still available following efforts to occupy space by non-
profit agencies or incubator, that area may be rented to for - profit
companies.
2. Madison Square Redevelopment:
a. Use Multi- Family Housing Study as basis for redevelopment, and
update that study as necessary.
b. Assemble remaining vacant properties in 2005 and the remaining
non - vacant properties by 2007.
C. Prepare RFP for public bid, select development company and
execute contract for redevelopment by January 2006.
d. Make land use amendments and zoning revisions necessary for
feasible redevelopment.
e. Complete redevelopment construction by 2007 -2008.
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04
Page 31 DRAFT
CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II RECOMMENDED ACTION PLAN
3. Hardee Courts Redevelopment:
a. Use Multi- Family Housing Study as basis for redevelopment, and
update that study as necessary.
b. Initiate property assemblage in 2008
C. Make land use amendments and zoning revisions necessary for
feasible redevelopment.
d. Complete redevelopment by 2010.
4. Hardee Gateway Redevelopment:
a. Use Multi - Family Housing Study as basis for redevelopment, and
update that study as necessary.
b. Initiate property assemblage in 2009
C. Make land use amendments and zoning revisions necessary for
feasible 'redevelopment.
d. Complete redevelopment by 2011.
5. Central Place Redevelopment:
a. Use Multi- Family Housing Study as basis for redevelopment, and
update that study as necessary.
b. Initiate property assemblage in 2010
C. Complete redevelopment by 2012.
6. South Miami Gardens:
a. Work with Miami -Dade County to develop feasible plan for
redevelopment on a phased basis by 2006.
b. Allocate funding in future years for fair share of project costs as
County- sponsored redevelopment occurs.
C. Help coordinate relocation plan that assures that any displaced
residents are relocated on site after completion of construction.
7. Church Street Beautification:
a. Construct the Phase If Church Street design plan for area south of
SW 64th Street to SW 69th Street by 2006.
b. Continue to seek County and State grant funds to help offset
design and/or construction costs.
c. Program construction funding in future years based on cost
estimates provided by above plan.
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04
Page 32 DRAFT
CRA PLAN UPDATE -PHASE II RECOMMENDED ACTION PLAN
8. East Side Parking Garage:
a. Solicit RFP bids for private developer to build parking garage on
parcel owned by City by 2007,
b. Complete construction by 2009.
9. Commerce Lane /Progress Road:
a. Allocate $35,000 in FY 2006 for preparation for a Streetscape
Design and Improvement Plan addressing parking, traffic and
pedestrian flows, landscaping, building facades, and lighting.
b. Seek County and State grant funds to help offset costs.
C. Program construction funding in future years based on cost
estimates provided by the approved Plan.
10. Trolley Circulator:
a. Assess ridership quarterly and make route adjustments
accordingly.
11. Pedestrian Bridge Over U.S. 1:
.a. In coordination with the Miami -Dade County Transit Agency assess
the feasibility of a unique, architecturally - pleasing aerial crosswalk
over U.S. 1 between the east side commercial and the South Miami
MetroRail Station areas.
b. Seek funding for the project from the Metropolitan Planning
Organization (MPO) in year 2007
C. Complete construction by year 2009.
12. David D. Bethel Pavilion
a. Construct pavilion at Marshall Williamson Park by October 2005.
13. Private Development Projects:
a. Facilitate the redevelopment of the 7 -acre site located southwest of
the intersection of SW 66th Street and Red Road, consistent with
the vision for the CRA area.
b. Provide assistance, as necessary, for development of the
Hometown Station Project and seek commitment from the
developer to provide 100 units of senior /moderate income housing.
C. Working with the Chamber of Commerce, - Beacon Council and
other business groups, identify new development projects in the
CRA and facilitate their development through infrastructure
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04
Page 33 DRAFT
CRA PLAN UPDATE PHASE II RECOMMENDED ACTION PLAN
assistance grants, appropriate land use and zoning revisions and
other means consistent with the CRA Plan.
d. Explore using the CRA's 501 c3 status in order to obtain grants that
will assist in financing new housing and rehabilitation of housing,
including low and moderate income housing.
i
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04
Page 34 DRAFT
H
W
aN
m
y
C
a
O
P v
:d
D
CD m
0 O
a p
N
c P)
N 'G
w
W
ID ID
R
CL
ti.
CD
w m
r
o. m
m
a
m
M .o
o o
m
m
m
CD
CD
o
C m
c
T
r
?
H
m w
C y
x
m CD
3
m. d
a
°a
2
�
m m
3
,o 2
o a=
co
c
3. 3
�
m
J N
CL
�
6
=
O
L
p 3.
o
p
o�
73 a
3
c
N
c
o
c c
CD
y
�O
y
CD
y,
5a
cf)
Cy
CD
oo
CD
N C Ln
a
5
2
a
°a
T
i
Z
h
0
I�
MEN
A
W N
O
ry
3
p c0
W
v
9)
Ol
�
M
C7
w
m
CD
O O. 4�
y
a c
c
7
b
y
w
CL
o
d
m
m Q CD 3
d m
n
P
o
d
p
d
w
a
y
2
C
ICm D J
7
Q
O
w
fD
o C)
= O
�'<
1w. m ° CD
° O
n
O
a
CD
�.�
O
_
O
w
n
O=
S
C
'O
0
O
C
~
2
m
m
(D
3
fD
cO
O
m
r
c m'0
El
CCD
y
'op
°
v
d
n
w
w
3 °
O
O a
a
O
0)
w
W
=: °`
N-0
w
CD
N
wc3D
O
d
Nµ
o°
D
r
_m
m
O
o
6
°
w
w
m
c
m
o
Q
a
c
TTY
a
3
<.
°'
?.
r
o
=
3
X w
m�
c
�
m
OS
CL '
'w
y
N�
u,
a
O
°•
a°
2
g
o
a
c
fl
m
°
_'
o
2
w
B
=
a
ti
a
y
0.
m
a
c
in
N
w
�; CD
o
o
°'
m
�.
N
3
2
b
~
0
-�
O
Q
N C3.
61
IISS
w
S
7
w
m
(p
CD
CD
9
m
m
n
CD
_
—°
a
m
Cn'
m�
m
T
_'
c
-
�
w
C-)
d
N
0
Cn.
Vl.
CA.
O
y
?
N
C
w
y
ni
m
N
w
m
N
. i
m
N
y
y �..
w
m
N
?
(D
y
n 7
ID S.
-o
C
A�
rn
'o o
tj rn
A {
10
v
w
�
A�
th
w
rn
A{
v
m
a
m
A,
o
0
c,
0
p o
7
A
a
m
o.
m
°.:
0
A
co
Aa
C
r
H
n
O0
y
a
3
M
m<
VI. REDEVELOPMENT FINANCE & BUDGET PROJECTIONS
A. INTRODUCTION
This section presents long -term (15 year) revenue projections and short -term (5
year) expenditure estimates for the SMCRA. The 5 -year Budget Plan is prepared
for planning purposes only and does not commit the SMCRA Board to any
specific expenditure of funds. The Board shall adopt an annual budget and work
program in accordance with its adopted By -laws at the beginning of each fiscal
year. This process will be carried out in accordance with the Miami -Dade County
/ South Miami Interlocal Agreement and Florida Statutes.
B. HISTORICAL AND CURRENT REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
The SMCRA has been operating for approximately 5 years and during that time
has received tax increment financing (TIF) payments from Miami -Dade County,
as well as, the City of South Miami. Table 6.1 below shows the revenue trend for
the SMCRA since FY 2000. Overall, growth in TIF revenues over that period has
been 7% or 1.4 % per year. In FY 2004, the SMCRA received $751,756 in TIF
revenues from the County and City.
TABLE 6.1. SMCRA Revenue Trends
Revenue Source
FY
99 -00
FY
00 -01
FY
01 -02
FY
02 -03
FY
03 -04
5 Year
%
Growth
South Miami TIF
$314,723
$333,466
$327,355
$310,354
$424,234.
35%
Miami -Dade TIF
$385,346
$339,964
$338,377
$301,399
$327,522
-150%
TOTAL TIF 1
$700,069
$673,430 1
$665,732
$611,753
$751,756
7%
Source: SMCRA staff, Dec. 2004. Subject to minor adjustments due to County accounting
methods.
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04
Page 37 DRAFT
REDEVELOPMENT FINANCE
CRA PLAN UPDATE PHASE II & BUDGET PROJECTIONS
C. PROJECTED REVENUES
Table 6.2 below presents the projected TIF revenues for the SMCRA through FY
2020. The revenue projections were based on a combination of historical growth
trends and known projects in the CRA either under construction or planned. The
projections start with FY 2005 (10 -1 -04 to 9- 30 -05).
TABLE 6.2: Projected SMCRA Revenues FY 2005 - 2020
Year
Taxable
Property Base
(prior year in
millions)
Incremental
Tax Base
Growth
(in millions)
County Tax
Increment
Payment
City Tax
Increment
Payment
Total CRA
Increment
Revenue
FY 2005
$ 198.9
$ 130.5
$ 333,555*
$ 446,972*
$780,527
2006
235.2
166.8
494,979
614,.908
1,109,887
2007
242.3
173.9
516,048
- 641,082
1;157,130
2008
264.4
196.0
581,630
722,554
1,304,184-
2009
309.8
241.4
716,355
889,992
1,606,347
2010
304.3
235.9
700,033
869,645
1,569,678
- 2-011.
3- 3 -Fr0-
-. _ -249.6
740,688_
_ 920, -150 -
- - - -- -
2012
332.3
263.9
783,123
972,867
1,755,990
2013
347.3
278.8
827,339
1,027,796
1,855,135
2014
362.9
294.5
873,929
1,085,674
1,959,603
2015
379.2
310.8
922,299
1,145,764
2,068;063
2016
396.3
327.9
973,043
1,208,803
2,181;846
2017
414.1
345.7
1,025,865
1,274,423
2,300,288
2018
432.7
364.3
1,081,060
1,342,991
2,424,051
2019
452.2
383.8
1,138,927
1,414,878
2,553,805
2020
472.5
404.1
1,199,167
1,489,715
2,688,882
Totals
b A _
- --
- --
$`12.9 million
$16.1 million
$ 29.0 million
....w ur vvuuLy PUynrcrrt CM vlly /JUUgVL cllllUUldIS.
Assumptions: 1998 base year taxable value = $68.4 million, 3% taxable base growth rate per
year though 2009 and 4.5% thereafter. Valencia building value (net $30.3 million) added in 2006,
Hometown Station (net $14.8 million) added in 2008 and deleted in 2010, and 7 -acre northeast
CRA mixed use site in 2009 ($37.5 million); 5.935 County millage rate; 7.373 City millage.
D. FIVE YEAR BUDGET ESTIMATES
Based on the revenue projections and the Action Plan presented previously, the
SMCRA has developed an estimated 5 -year schedule of revenues and
expenditures presented In Table 6.3
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04
Page 38 DRAFT
REDEVELOPMENT FINANCE
CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II & BUDGET PROJECTIONS
TABLE 6.3. Five -Year
Bud et Plan (Prellmina
)
FY 2006
FY 2007
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
Totals
Revenues:
County TIF
$494,979
$516,048
$581,630
$716,355
$700,033
$3,009,045
City TIF
614,908
641,082
722,554
889,922
869,645
3,738,111
Other
20,000
25,000
25;000
30,000
30,000
130,000
Revenues
Total
1,129,887
1,182,130
1,329,184
1,636,277
1,599,678
$ 6,877,156
Revenues
Ex enditures
Commercial
$60,000:
$80,000
$80,000
$130,000
$100,000
$450,000
Fagade
Neighborhood
150,000
175,000
175,000
210,000
160,000
870,000
Infill,
Residential
15,000
30,000
30,000
35,000
25,000
135,000
Rehab.
Public
140,000
160,000
160,000
210,000
210,000
880,000
Safety /Code
Enforcement
-Work/Study-
-10 0000
10;000 "
12;500
15,000
15,000
62,500
Job Training
30,000
40,000
50,000
70,000
50,000
240,000
Business
30,000
30,000
30,000
30,000
40,000
160,000
Attraction/
Start-ups
Mortgage
40,000
60,000
80,000
90,000
80,000
350,000
Guarantees
Bike /Ped. Plan
- - --
50,000
80,000
100,000
90,000
320,000
Lighting
- - --
40,000
65,000
140,000
140,000
385,000
Program
Mobley Bldg.
35,000
25,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
90,000
Madison
140,000
75,000
50,000
- - --
- - --
265,000
Square
Hardee Courts
- - --
- - --
150,000
65,000
35,000
250,000
Hardee-
- - --
- -__
- - --
100,000
50,000
- 150,000
Gateway
Central Place
- - --
____
____
s_ -_
200,000
200,000
Church St.
125,000
50,000
50,000
- - --
- - --
225,000
East Side
10,000
10,000
- - --
- - --
20,000
Parking
Commerce
35,000
75,000
50,000
100,000
50,000
310,000
Lane
Trolley
35,000
20,000
- --
- - --
- --
55,000
Pedestrian
10,000
10,000
- - --
-_ -_
____
20,000
Bridge over
us 1
Bethel
25,000
- - --
- - --
- - --
- - --
25,000
Pavilion
Administration
200,000
205,000
220,000
260,000
270,000
1,155,000
Contingency
39,887
37,130
36,684
71,277
74678 I
259,656
Total
1,129,887
1,182,130
1,329,184
1,636,277
1,599,678 11
$ 6;877,156
CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II APPENDIX A
TABLE A.1 - 2000 Population By Race (Persons)
Miami- Dade
County _
South Miami
South
Miami CRA
Total Population
2,253,362
10,741
1,951
Population of one race:
2,167,940
10,512
1,904
White alone
1,570,558
7,502
252
Black or African American alone
457,214
2,653
1,629
American Indian and Alaska
Native alone
4,365
15
2
Asian alone
31,753
150
7
Native Hawaiian and Other
Pacific Islander alone
799
4
0
Some other race alone
103,251
188
14
nPO ulation of two or more races
85,4221
2291
47
CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II APPENDIX A
TABLE A.2 - 2000 Population By Sex And Age (Persons)
Age - Group
Miami- Dade County
South Miami
South
Miami CRA
Total Male Population
1,086,558
5,169
879
Under 5 Years
73,996
317
69
5 - 9 Years
81,365
358
104
10 -14 Years
81,320
356
118
15 -19 Years
78,156
304
89
20 -24 Years
71,525
358
54
25 -34 Years
165,462
779
97
35 -44 Years
183,197
899
103
45 -54 Years
133,271
723
77
55 -64 Years
96,070
490
77
65 -74 Years
72,404
345
69
75 -84 Years
38,397
191
16
85 Years And Older
11,395
29
6
Total Female Population
1,166,804
5,572
1,072
Under 5 Years
70,854
314
84
5 - 9 Years
77,988
354
92
10 -14 Years
78,324
347
97
15 -19 Years
- 76,022
293
82
20 -24 Years
72,023
316
64
25 -34 Years
167,961
803
139
35 -44 Years
187,302
915
148
45 -54 Years
147,727
787
109
55 -64 Years
110,482
544
99
65 -74 Years
90,454
448
80
75 -84 Years
60,914
319
43
85 Years And Older
26,753
132
35
Source: 2000 Census; Summary File 1
TABLE A.3 Household Characteristics (Households)
Miami -Dade
South Miami
South
Miami CRA
Households
776,774
4,301
670
Families
548,493
2,593
423
Married Couple Families
370,898
1,739
140
With Own Children
175,547
726
54
Other Family
177,595
854
283
No Wife/With Children
16,889
80
19
No Husband/With Children 1
70,3161
318
136
CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II APPENDIX A
TABLE A.4 - Housing And Tenure Characteristics (Housing Units)
Source: 2000 Census; Summary File 1
TABLE A.5 - Averaae Household Size of Occupied Units by Tenure
Average Household Size
Miami -Dade
South Miami
South
Miami CRA
Housing Units
852,278
4,557
709
Occupied
776,774
4,393
670
Owner
449,325
2,673
261
Renter
327,449
1,628
409
Vacant
75,504
156
39
For Rent
19,866
47
13
For Sale
9,855
24
1
Rented /Sold, Not
Occupied
5,022
21
3
Seasonal /Occasional Use
29,587
28
2
For Migrant Workers
59
0
0
Other
11,1151
36
20
Source: 2000 Census; Summary File 1
TABLE A.5 - Averaae Household Size of Occupied Units by Tenure
Average Household Size
Miami -Dade
County
South
Miami
SMCRA
Census Tract
76.03
Total.
2.84
2.47
2.84
Owner occupied
3.01
2.79
3.62
Renter Occu ied
2.61
1.97
2.13
CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II APPENDIX A
TABLE A.6 - 2000 Age of Housing
Time Period Built
Miami -Dade
County
South
Miami
SMCRA
Census Tract
76.03
1999 - March 2000
14;019
8
0
1995-1998
50,523
77
36
1990-1994
64,968
55
19
1980-1989
155,186
260
107
1970-1979
191,906
824
294
1960-1969
142,827
1,080
293
1950-1959
140,635
1,561
263
1940-1949
56,783
428
186
1939 Or Earlier
35,431
260
51
Total
852,278
4,553
1,249
Source: 2000 Census; Summary File 3
TABLE A.7 -Value Of Specified Owner- Occupied Housing (Occupied Units)
Value Range ($)
Less Than 50,000
Miami -Dade
County
8,856
South
Miami
25
SMCRA
Census Block Groups
48
50,000 - 69,999
20,119
94
251
70,000 - 89,999
52,030
179
37
90,000 - 99,999
33,286
93
43
100,000 - 124,999
55,813
128
25
125,000- 149,999
54,149
332
19
150,000 - 174,999
34,607
402
0
175,000 - 199,999
18,907
222
0
200,000 And More
58,048
875
0
Total
335,815
2,350
423
Median Value
S
$124,000
$170,100
BG1 = $92,300
BG2 = $81,500
BG3 = $60,700
BG4 = $0
ource. 2000 Census; Standard File 3, Summary File 3
12 -23 -04
DRAFT
CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II APPENDIX A
TABLE A.8 - Monthly Gross Rent (Renter- Occupied Housing Units)
Gross Rent/Month ($)
Miami -Dade
County
South Miami
SMCRA
Census Tract
76.03
With Cash Rent
317,690
1,666
603
Less Than 200
19,076
110
110
200-299
11,302
34
34
300-499
53,881
222
134
500-749
125,095
708
121
750-999
69,880
402
155
1,000 - 1,499
30,560
113
32
1,500 And More
7,896
77
17
No Cash Rent
9,143
77
17
Median
$ 647 Per
Month
$ 672 Per
Month
$570 Per Month
Source: 2000 Census; Standard File 3, Summary File 3.
TABLE A.9 2000 Household Income
Income Range M
Miami -Dade S
South S
SMCRA
($ /year) C
County M
Miami C
Census Block
Groups 3
Less than 10,000 1
107,901 5
571 G
303
10,000 - 14,999 5
58,409 2
285 1
100
15,000 - 19,999 5
55,140 2
274 1
105
20,000 - 29,999 1
108,489 5
547 2
231
30,000 - 39,999 9
93,835 3
363 1
122
40,000 - 49,999 7
76,798 3
391 8
86
50,000- 59,999 6
61,726 2
273 6
65
60,000 - 74,999 6
67,807 2
278 5
58
75,000 - 99,999 6
63,132 5
581 4
40
100,000 and more 8
84,141 7
722< 8
86
Total Households 7
777,378 4
4,285 1
1,196
Median per year $
$35,966 $
$42,488 B
BG1 = $31,983
BG2 = $25,104
BG3 = $14,913
BG4 = $24,444
ource. 2000 Census, Standard File 3, Summary File 3.
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA I2 -23 -04
DRAFT
CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II APPENDIX A
TABLE A.10-2000 Population For Whom Poverty Status Is Determined
Poverty Status -
Miami -Dade
South Miami
SMCRA
Less Than 15%
County
211
Census Tract
15%-19%
36,384
205
76.03
..Income Below Poverty Level
396,995
1,864
1,097
Income At Or Above Poverty
1,812,094
9,041
2,306
Level
26,566
124
10
Total 1
2,209,089
10,905
1 3,403
Source: 2000 Census; Standard File 3, Summary File 3.
TABLE A.11 Gross Rent As A Percentage Of Household Income
Percent Of Income Spent
On Gross Rent
Miami -.Dade
County
South Miami
SMCRA
Census Tract
76.03
Less Than 15%
39,402
211
106
15%-19%
36,384
205
62
20%-24%
38,300
198
68
25%-29%
35,117
230
84
30%-34%
26,566
124
10
35 %° or More
127,500
556
250
Not Computed
23,564
219
40
Total
326,833
1,743
620
CRA PLAN UPDATE = PHASE II
Miami -Dade
County
South Miami
APPENDIX A
Housing Units With A Mortgage
258,002
TABLE A.12 - Monthly Owner Costs As A Percentage Of Household Income
308
Percent Of Income Spent On
Miami -Dade
South
SMCRA
10%-14% -
28,079
Gross Housing Costs
County
Miami
Census Tract
381
46
20%-24%
39,125
242
41
25%-29%
Source: 2000 Census; Standard File 3, Summary File 3.
TABLE A.13 - Tenure By Vehicles Available (Households)
Vehicles Available
Miami -Dade
County
South Miami
76.03
Housing Units With A Mortgage
258,002
1,809
308
Less Than 10%
11,651
127
8
10%-14% -
28,079
190
46
15%-19%
39,147
381
46
20%-24%
39,125
242
41
25%-29%
31,322
199
40
30%-34%
23,013-
153
26
35%-39%
16,779
75
12
40%-49%
21,477
136
15
50 % Or More
45,189
298
74
Not Computed
2,220
8
0
Housing Units Without A Mortgage
77,813
541
115
- Less Than 10%
26,847
253
38
10%-14% "
16,194
57
22
15%-19%
9,090
42
19'
" 20%-24%
6,033
39
0
25%-29%
4,230
29
6
30%-34%
2,998
46
10
35%-39%
2,069
8
8
40%-49%
3,049
35
0
50% Or More
5,802
32
5
Not Computed
1,501
0
7
Source: 2000 Census; Standard File 3, Summary File 3.
TABLE A.13 - Tenure By Vehicles Available (Households)
Vehicles Available
Miami -Dade
County
South Miami
SMCRA
Census Tract
76.03
Owner - Occupied
None
29,059
166
114
1 Vehicle
148,947
879
222
2 Vehicles
187,586
1,178
160
3 Vehicles
60,280
338
64
4 Or More Vehicles
23,461
81
9
Renter - Occupied
None
82,264
342
234
1 Vehicle
152,553
899
290
2 Vehicles
75,670
445
104
3 Vehicles
12,953
55
0
4 Or More Vehicles
4,001
0
0
Source: 2000 Census; Standard File 3, Summary File 3,
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -23 -04
DRAFT
CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II ` APPENDIX A
TABLE A.14 - 2000 Educational Attainment (Persons Age 25 and Older
Education Status
Miami -Dade
County
South Miami
SMCRA
Census Tract
76.03
Male
700,196
3,464
947
Not High School Graduate
222,658
525
334
High School Graduate
150,726
628
253
1 -3 Years College
162,019
867
162
4 Years of College +
164,793
1,444
198
Female
791,593
4,044
1,159
Not High School Graduate
256,695
850
417
High School Graduate
182,271
727
325
1 -3 Years College
194,021
1,054
295
4 Years of College +
158,606
1,413
122
Total
1,491,789
7,508
2,106
Source: 2uuu Census; Summary Hle 3. ,
TABLE A.15 - Sex By Emplovment Status (Population 16 Years and Older)
SexlEmployment Status
Miami -Dade
County
South Miami
SMCRA
_Census Tract
76.03
Total Labor Force
1,758,374
8,687
2,500
Male
834,320
4,071
1,122
In Labor Force
535,323
2,880
659
In Armed Services
1,222
0
0
Civilian
534,101
2,880
659
Employed
493,524
2,691
592
Unemployed
40,577
189
67
Not In Labor Force
298,997
1,191
463
Female
924,054
4,616
1,378
In Labor Force
475,642
2,651
648
In Armed Services
287
0
0
Civilian
475,355
2,651
648
Employed
427,684
2,527
560
Unemployed
47,671
124
88
Not In Labor Force
448,412
1,965
730
Source: 2000 Census; Standard File 3, Summary File 3.
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA
12 -23 -04
DRAFT
Preface
This is one of a series of short profiles of Neighborhood
Revitalization Strategy Areas in , Miami -Dade County, Florida.
These areas are targeted for assistance by the Miami -Dade County
Office of Community and Economic Development under the U.S.
HUD Community Development Block Grant program.
These profiles present data from the 2000 Census, Summary Files
1 and 3. Summary File 1 includes basic demographic and housing
characteristics from the census "short form" which went to all
households. Summary File 3 data are from the census "long form,"
sent to a sample of one-in-ten households in Miami -Dade. These '
data include economic and social measures such as income,
poverty, employment, and education. Where possible, data from
2000 are compared to 1990 and 1980 data to describe change in
these communities;
Support for these profiles was provided by the Miami -Dade
County Office of Community and Economic Development.
i
South Miami
The South Miami Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area is a
Black community in the City of South Miami. It is a low-income
and high - poverty area. The poverty rate for persons in 2000 was
49 percent, up from the 38 percent recorded in 1990. The percent
of families in poverty grew from 38 to 43 percent.
Households in South Miami were more likely to rent than own
their housing units. Home values and rents were well below the
County average.
South Miami residents had a lower level of educational attainment
than the County average.
In sum, the South Miami Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy
Area showed some population and housing growth, but showed
increasing poverty levels. The area continues to face a range of
serious social and economic challenges.
1
L-j L-JILJ Uli LJ L-JI, Li Li LJ
Introduction
The South Miami Revitalization Area is located in the City of South Miami in a roughly
rectangular area bounded by SW 62 Street on the north; SW 62 Avenue on the West; and SW 72
Street on the south. The eastern boundary is SW 57 Avenue between SW 72 and 64 Streets; then
west to SW 59th Avenue and north to SW 62 Street.
Originally known as Larkins, the area has a long history as a tightly -knit Black settlement. The
first Black settler, Marshall Williams, arrived in 1912 from Madison, Florida. He bought land in
Larkins and encouraged other Black residents of Madison to do likewise.
Through the 1920s the economy depended largely on the railroad, which was used to ship fruits
and vegetables.
Demographic Characteristics
Total Population
The 2000 population of 2,091 was an increase over the 1,726 recorded in 1990, reversing a
downward trend in the 1980s.
Black and Hispanic Population
The South Miami NRSA was a Black community (92 percent) in 2000 as it has been for many
decades. Hispanics were 11 percent of the population up from the 6 percent reported in 1990.
3
Table 1
Population by Race and Hispanic Origin
South Miami and Miami -Dade County
1980-2000
Change
Change
1980
80 to 90
1990
90 to 00
2000
Total
1,872
-146
1,726
365
2,091
Black
1,750
-161
1,589
201
1,790
Hispanic
91
4
95
132
227
White
ill
-16
95
181
276
Non Hispanic White
53
-14
39
49
88
Non Hispanic Black
1,721
-143
1,578
189
1,767
Percent
Total
100%
-8 %
100 %
21%
100%
Black
93 %
-9%
92%
13%
86%
Hispanic
3%
4%
6%
139%
11%
White
6%
-14 %
6%
191%
13 %
Non Hispanic White
3%
-26%
2 %
126 %
4%
Non Hispanic Black
92%
-8 %
91 %
12%
85%
Miami -Dade
Total
100%
19%
100 %
16%
100%
Black
` 17%
42%
21 %
21%
21%
Hispanic
36%
64%
49%
35%
57%
White
78%
12%
73 %
15%
72%
Non Hispanic White
46 %
-22%
30%
-19%
21%
Non Hispanic Black
17 %°
37%
19%
20%
20 %
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population and Housing,
Summary
Tape File
1A, Florida, 1980,' 1990.
U.S. 'Census Bureau, Census 2000, Summary File 1, Miami-Dade
County Department of Planning and Zoning, Research Section, 2003.
4
Age
Like many Black
communities, South
Miami has a -
relatively
young population. About 56
percent of the population
was below 35 years of age
compared to 48 'percent in the County.
About 12 percent were 65 years and over, compared to 14
percent in
the County.
Table 2
Age Distribution
South Miami
and Miami -Dade County
1980 -2000
South Miami
Miami -Dade
1980
1990
2000
1980
1990
2000
Total Persons
1,872
1,726
2,091
1,623,781
1,937,094
2,253,362
Less than 5
161
184
169
94,237
139,714
157,871
5 to 9
167
158
205
101,385
131,426
145,752
10 -14
199
162
232
111,386
120,490
160,754
15 -19
222
169
187
136,285 -
131,060
154,989
20 -24
200
135
127
133;039
139,196
144,721
25 -29
151
128
119
125,898
168,342
163,859
30 -34
88
117
132
114,333
163,334
173,574
35 -44
182
182
270
192,585
278,043
361,966
45 -54
165
163
203
187,309
212,098
282,766
55 -59
68
61
88
90,929
91,769
109,141
60 -64
53
67
99
80,555
90,816
97,417
65 -74
149
93
155
149,491
146,131
162,257
75+
67
107
105
105,698
124,675
138,295
South Miami
Miami -Dade
Total Persons
100%
100% `
100%
1000/0
100%
100% °
Less than 5
9%
11%
8%
6%
7%
7%
5 to 9
9%
9%
10%
6%
7 %
6%
10 -14
11%
9%
11%
-7%
6%
7%
15 -19
12%
10%
9%
8%
7%
7%
20 -24
11%
8%
6%
8%
7%
6%
25 -29
8%
7%
6%
8%
9%
7%
30 -34
5%
7%
6%
7%
8%
8%
35 -44
10%
11%
13%
12%
14%
16%
45 -54
9%
9%
10%
12%
11%
13%
55 -59
4%
4%
4%
6%
5%
5%
66 -64
3%
4%
5%
5%
5%
4%
65 -74
8%
5%
7%
9 %
8%
7%
75+
4%
6%
5%
7%
6%
6%
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population and Housing, Summary Tape File 1A,
Florida, 1980 and
1990. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000, Miami -Dade County Department of
Planning and Zoning, Research Section, 2003.
5
Household Structure.
Households in South Miami were less likely to be comprised of married couples (32 percent
compared to about 68 percent Countywide). The percent of family households headed by a
female householder (58 percent) was much higher than the County average (24 percent).
Table 3
Households by Family Status
South Miami and Miami -Dade County
1990 -2000
South Miami Miami -Dade
Change Change
1990 90 to 00 2000 1990 90 to 00 2000
Total Households
544
170
714
692,355
84,419
776,774
Family Households
353
101
454
481,260
67,233
548,493
Married Couple
121
25
146
342,512
28,386
370,898
With children
71
-15
56
164,216
11,331
175,547
No children
50
40
90
178,296
17,055
195,351
Male Householder
36
7
43
35,377
8,547
43,924
With children
21
0
21
17,177
-288
16,889
No children
15
7
22
18,200
8,835
27,035
Female householder
196
69
265
103,371
30,300
133,671
With children
156
-12
144
64,848
5,468
70,316
No children
40
81
121
38,523
24,832
63,355
Non- family Households
191
69
260
211,092
17,189
228,281
Percent
Total Households
100%
31 %°
100 %
100%
12%
100 %
Family Households
65%
29%
64%
70%
14 %
71%
Married Couple
22%
21% 0
20% 0
49%
8 %
48%
With children
13%
-21%
8%
24%
7 %
23 %
No children
9 %°
80%
13%
26 %0
10%
25%
Male Householder
7%
19%
6 %
5 %
24%
6 %
With children
4 %
0%
3%
2%
-2%
2%
No children
3%
47%
3 %
3%
49%
3 %
Female householder
36 %
35%
37%
15%
29 %
17 %
With children
29%
-8 %0
20%
9%
8%
9 %°
No children
7%
203%
17%
6 %
64 %
8%
Non- family Households
35%
36 %
36%
30% 0
8%
29%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000, Summary File 1, Miami-Dade County Department of Planning
and Zoning, Research Section, 2003.
6
Housing
Number of Units
The 754 housing units reported in 2000 was an increase over the 596 reported in 1990, reversing
a decline in the previous decade.
Tenure and Vacancy
The vacancy rate in South Miami in
2000 was much lower than the comparable
County figure of
9 percent.
I
Renter - occupied units accounted for
61 percent of all occupied units, down from the 69 percent
reported in 1990, but continued to be higher
than the County's 42 percent.
Table 4
Housing Units by Tenure and Vacancy Status
South Miami and Miami -Dade County
1990 to 2000
South Miami
Miami -Dade
Change 90
Change
1990 to 00 2000
1990
90 to 00
2000
Total Units
596 158 754
771,288
80,990
852,278
Occupied Units
544 170 714
692,355
84,419
776,774
Owner Occupied
170 111 281
375,912
73,413
449,325
Renter Occupied
374 59 433
316,443
11,006
327,449
Vacant Units
70 -30 40
78,933
-3,429
75,504
For Rent
35 -22 13
31,611
- 11,745
19,866
For Sale
2 -1 1
11,007
-1,152
9,855
Seasonal/Other
15 -10 5
32,736
-3,090
29,646
Vacant/Boarded Up/ Other Vacant
18 3 21
3,579
12,558
16,137
Percent
Total Units
100% 27% 100%
100% 0
100%
100%
Occupied Units
91% 31 % 95%
90%
104%
91 %
Owner Occupied
29% 65% 37%
49%
91%
53 %
Renter Occupied
63% 16% 57%
41 %
14%
38%
Vacant Units
12% -43 % 5%
10 %
4%0
9%
For Rent
6% -63% 0 2%
4%
-15%
2 %
For Sale
0% -50% 0 %
1% 0
-1 %
1%
Seasonal/Other
3% -67% 1%
4%
4%
3%
Vacant/Boarded Up/ Other Vacant
3% 17 % 3%
00/0
351%
2 %
Vacancy Rate
12% -19 % 5%
10%
-4 %
9%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000,
Summary File 3, Miami Dade County Department of Planning and
Zoning, Research Section, 2003.
7
Housing Values and Rents
All of the owner- occupied homes in South Miami were valued at less
than $100,000 in 2000.
The comparable County figure was 34 percent.
Table 5
Value of Specified Owner - Occupied Housing
South Miami and Miami -Dade County
1990 to 2000
1990
2000
South Miami Miami- Dade South Miami ` Miami- Dade
Total Units
138 275,298 83
335,815
less than $30,000
18 4,095 0
2,097
$30,000 to $59,999.
60 44,179 32
13,900
$60,000 to $99,999
54 129,221 51
98,294
$100,000 to $149,999
4 52,723 0
109,962
$150,000 to $199,999
2 18,764 ` , 0
53,514
$200,000+
0 25,746 0
58,048
Percent
Total Units
100.0% 0 100.0% 100.0 %
100.0%
less than $30,000
13.0% 15%° 0.0%
0.6%
$30,000 to $59,999
43.5% 160% 38.6%
4.1 %°
$60,000 to $99,999
39.1% 46.9% 61.4%
29.3%
$100,000 to $149,999
2.9% 192% 0.0%
32.7%
' $150,000 to $199,999
1.4% 68% 0.0%
$200,000+
0.0 % 9.4% 0:0%
17.3%
Source: U. S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population and Housing, Summary Tape File 1,
Florida, 1990. U.S.
Census Bureau, Census 2000, Summary File 3,
Miami Dade County
Department of Planning and Zoning, Research Section, 2003.
8
About 76 percent of rental units rented for less than $500. The comparable County figure was 38
percent:
Table 6
Contract
Rent for Renter - Occupied
Units
South Miami and Miami -Dade County
1990 to 2000
1990
2000
South Miami Miami -Dade
South Miami Miami -Dade
Total Units
361
305,935
325
326,833
less than $100
54
15,527
50
18,675
$100 to $199
95
16,181
88
16,614
$200 to $249
46
14,021
39
5,360
$250 to $299
41
21,364
14
6,510
$300 to $349
49
30,280
20
10,741
$350 to $399
34
39,390
21
16,473
$400 to $449
21
36,104
-
22,095
$450 to $499
17
34,036
15
29,180
$500 to $599
4
48,431
40
58,061
$600 to $699
0
25,047
12
53,707
$700+
0
25,554
26
89,417
Percent
Total Units
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
less than $100
15.0%
5.1% 0
15.4%
5.7%
$100 to $199
26.3%
5.3%
27.1%
5.1%
$200 to $249
12..7%
4.6%
12.0%
1.6 %
$250 to $299
11.4%
7.0%
4.3%
2.0%
$300 to $349
13.6%
9.9%
6.2%
3.3%
$350 to $399
9.4%
12.9%
6.5 %
5.0%
$400 to $499
5.8%
11.8%
0.0 %
6.8%
$450 to $499
4.7 %
11.1%
4.6%
8.9%
$500 to $599
1.1%
15.8%
12.3%
17.8%
$600 to $699
0.0%
8.2%
3.7%
16.4%
$700+
0.0%
8.4%
8.0%
27.4%
Source: U. S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population and Housing, Summary
Tape File 1-A, Florida, 1990.
U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000, Summary Pile 3,
Miami -Dade County Department of Planning and Zoning, Research Section, 2003.
9
Income
Incomes in South Miami were lower than the County average.
About 80 percent of all households with income had incomes below $35,000,
compared to 48
percent in Miami -Dade County.
Table 7
Income Distribution
Households with Income
South
Miami and Miami -Dade County
1999
South Miami
Miami -Dade
Total
Black Hispanic
Total
Black
Hispania
Less than $10,000
178
92 93
107,901
27,389
62,527
$10,000 to $14,999
61
46 15
58,409
12,035
35,437
$15,000 to $24,999
119
112 7
111,649
22,886
67,667
$25,000 to $34,999
56
40 16
100,833
19,273
59,907
$35,000 to $49,999
85
52 14
121,780
21,239
69,946
$50,000 and over
16
10 0
276,806
35,232
141,943
Total Households
515
352 145
777,378
138,054
437,427
Percent
Less than $10,000
35%
26% 64%
14%
20%
14%
$10,000 to $14,999
12%
13% 10%
$%
9%
8% o
$15,000 to $24,999
23%
32% 5%
14%
17 %°
15%
$25,000 to $34,999
11 %°
11 %° 11%
13%
14%
14%
$35,000 to $49,999
17%
15 % 10% 0
16%
15%
16%
$50,000 and over
3 %
3% 0%
36%
26%
32%
Total Households
100%
100 % 100%
100%
100%
100%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000, Summary File 3,
Miami-Dade County Department of
Planning and Zoning, Research Section, 2003.
10
Povertv
In 2000, South Miami continued to be a high- poverty area. The poverty rate for persons was 49
percent, considerably higher than the County's 18 percent, and up from the 38 percent recorded
in 1990.
Children were especially affected by poverty. About 60 percent of all children under 18 were
poor, higher than the 44 percent reported in 1990. This was considerably worse than the
County's high poverty rates for children, 23 percent:
Table -8
Number and Percent of Persons in Poverty
South Miami and Miami -Dade County
1990 and 2000
South Miami Miami -Dade
1990 2000 1990 2000
Total Persons 768 38% 714 49% 341,261 18% 396,995 18%
Black 520 31% 590 40% 117,357 30% 124,801 29%
Hispanic 168 78% 122 8% 183,207 20% 223,335 18%
Elderly 154 58% 107 7% 52,706 20% 55,020 19%
Young
Under 5 99 46% 110 8% 33,721 25% 32,995 23%
Under 18 294 44% 345 24% 1 111,739 24 % 127,435 23%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000, Summary File 3; Miami -Dade County Department of
Planning and Zoning, Research Section, 2003.
Reflecting personal poverty, household poverty rates also remained quite high. About 43 percent
of all family households were below the poverty level, an increase over the 37 percent in 1980.
Among female householder households with children, a high 56 percent were in poverty, about
the same level as in 1990.
Table 9
Percent of Households in Poverty
South Miami and Miami -Dade County
1990 and 2000
South Miami Miami -Dade
1990 2000 _1990 2000
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent
Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor
Family Households 146 37% 111 43% 68,679 14% 80,108 14%
Female headed families,
with children & no
husband present 111 58% 69 56% 27,076 420/. 31,621 37 %
Source; U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000, Summary File 3, Miami -Dade County Department of Planning and
Zoning, Research Section, 2003.
11
Employment
Labor Force Status
In 2000, 16 percent of the civilian labor force in South Miami was unemployed, the same level
as in 1990,, but much higher than the comparable County figure (9 percent). The rate of labor
force participation in the area was much lower than the County average. About 62 percent of
area residents over 16 were not in the labor force, i.e., neither employed nor looking for work,
compared to Miami - Dade's 43 percent.
Table 10
Labor Force Status, Persons 16 Years and Over
South Miami and Miami -Dade County
1990 and 2000
South Miami Miami -Dade
1990 2000' 1990 2000
Hispanic Hispanic
Total Total Black Origin Total Total Black Origin
Civilian Labor Force 6,674 359 313 30 976,754 1,009,456 184,703 586,601
Employed 5,626 300 260 30 901,828 921,208 159,184 535,989
Unemployed 1,048 59 53 0 74,926 88,248 25,519 50,612
Not in Labor Force 3,609 577 381 175 537,778 747,409 134,834 460,333
Percent
Civilian labor Force 100 % 100% 0 1000/0 10011/0 100% 100% 100 % 100%
Employed 84 % 84% 83 % 100% 92% 91% 86 % 91 %
Unemployed 16% 16% 17% 0 % 8% 9% 14% 9 %
Not in Labor Force 1 35% 1 62 % 55% 85% 36% 43% 42% 44 %
Note: All figures refer to the civilian labor force. Members of the armed forces are excluded.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000, Summary File 3, Miami-Dade County Department of Planning and
Zoning, Research Section, 2003.
12
Educational Attainment
The educational attainment levels
of South Miami residents over 25 years lagged behind the
County levels. A high 48
percent had not completed high school compared to the County
average (15 percent). Only 7
percent had completed four or more years of college compared to
21 percent in Miami- Dade.
Table 11
Educational Attainment
Persons Age 25 and Over
South Miami and Miami -Dade County
1990 to 2000
1990 2000
South Miami Miami -Dade South Miami Miami -Dade
Not High School Graduate
617 448,282 396 229,000
High School Graduate
375 296,444 229 458,458
1 -3 Years College
154 296,109 139 536,040
4 Years of College +
29 240,460 56 323,399
Total
_ 1,175 1,281,295 820 1,546,897
Percent
Not High School Graduate
53.7% 35.0 % 48.3% 14.8%
High School Graduate
26.5 %° 23.1% 27.9 %° 29.6%
1 -3 Years College
15.8% 23.1 % 17.0% 34.7%
4 Years of College +
4.0 % 18.8% 6.8% 20.9%
Total
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population and Housing, Summary Tape File
3A, Florida, 1990. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000, Summary File 3, Miami -Dade County
Department of Planning and Zoning, Research Section, 2003.
13
CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II A
APPENDIX C
TABLE C.1 - 2004 Income Limits Schedule
0 In
J
1 rl Y2 U I
CIO alzel= 04"e ibo '
y �,- 1 tppeIN",i��h a :: 't C ' 9n ImT 99 6 N .9.4114, 9�4 4 . IFS -wt'
w f`
' fi41 -7 '9� j fi
g ?, as 2t
It l V M SM "7 +°
71 % �P3 ��
i m 1
1h G %a G 'e. t: 5 3 G Ci a `. B C, ail i 0 0 4 6
an J ae,7 5IP an fia r ra r a< v $ m ala
.�''� c ae �a �`i ma � r
N T4 IY< +T i9 10 — 11 0 w w a 7' 4 rv7 Kra 9`F iT Cz r- r2y
N a°9 r,Y i? PI; M 3 — N J4E C? M •• r 'aP �t la ��
v S x F4 9 rN +.r 4 b r' 22 9 �a a7 4. 7 ig 02S 9 m ^4� rYIvat nmwr,..<s« aw RL r u"cas
Q4 9% by e, c 2 w 7 v '. e H � 9 w n l � =' � 52 g 24 lNw T 1�C
1* 0 M, C, a 'u aEa�{�7.. 0 01— el �7 (9 r7, 6 s3 tfi aBa L"a fi] $ E
% ns {n+1 sM 4 2 i�'v h- .+z`3 '^WJ, W n F N '7' W R 12pA
L�p � �. � � � �w � �A. Y4 tii � � :c�tl �l r5� � n_ IL7 47 {T � ^_ f. +T •. �•
4
_R x" 9 gip. c� '§a• + ry S r. 2 ^ :R 2 9 '� c, 9 0 9 � 9 13
ri
Ol to !_ at 73 a+, � n. ii N: �'. •"^ .°g •T ap m i°z ..- Ad u, f? C'! � ep
4a 14 a am.iu;r a na.ra rtiu;� rn�sr- w
r, cw oa r: .•- r C9 44 � +a �?'} n -.� � aL, r
tit RP3 t . ', U, Z Ln W 4 -.,19
ZY+ c" ems'-. wN r � = � v. r�S•
ire2R 0 zo�sr'e,0 -9 �vzR# 29 z 0?xA 0e$° 0gogP,
F 'P 4- 4 r [��j n #
C9 r a+4 .,a c' c :aW 4i rm R. T
rs; m
{
Florida Housing Finance Corporation January 2004
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -23-04
DRAFT
CRA PLAN UPDATE – PHASE II APPENDIX C
C
TABLE C.2 - 2004 Rent Schedule by Number of Bedrooms in Unit
Effedive 12012M4 %ten pms" INO and Later
� P��rcd 1r:9G4 13y1r�1�� cf Pr�oY iix
F €orida Housing Finance Corporation
2004 Maximum Rents by Nurriberof Sedrowns €t) Uhk
NOTE: 'lift schedule is 90 tie Md b;0 deve1cpaims parlicipamg in the folicva g pr farms: "ousiog Lredl (1gc,,1
receiving aaocatiara ON and AFTER January 1, 1 caSQ, State Hasastng Initiatives Parrs ip (SHP), and
HUD P kffilamIly, ftk Shating. Exchjdkg SHIP, 9hest 6igwes repsesem MMIMUM gross fart`s moth must
Percentage uroyhe� �i Bc. rdrirrrs rri liti €t
city (COMM Catmgw 6FF
aareesv le MSA 273 283._ Z-3
AachuW
33%
301 372
387 4477
4911
35%
M9 342
411 475
M.
40%
365 391
478 543
oo
45%
M 444
528 610
61
50%
456 489
587 678
75T
6
547 587
705 814.
M
80%
731 783
940 1,085
1.211
121
1,11;15 1,134:
1.4.10 1,629
1.618
JaC aCrlA i° MSA
28%
277 297
356 Mi
M
(Cla+yffitiva9#
30%
297 315
392 441
492
NassaufSaintJohns)
35%
346 371
445 514
574
396 424
509 589
657
45%
445 477
372 662
T39
50%
085 5320
M6 736
82-1
60%
5914 635
763 882
985
83%
792 649
U19 1,177 7
1.312
120%
1,188 1,273
1,527 1.765
11971
�K@ �&!Irr4�ilar9 e
311 J50
(Polka
33%
271 290
348 403
449
35%
287 399
370 427
076
40%
329 352
423 489!
5
45%
370 396
475 550
613
53%
411 440
528 611
681
60%
093 528
634 733
817
W%
657 705
808 917
1.090
12"(10A
9$7 1r85i
1,2611- 1467
1,636
pain Bay NIA
3D
237 308
368 426
476
(Em rard)
356
333 339
430 497
555
4
363 410
492 568
45%
430 464
5531 640
714
473 513
015 711
783
60%
574 615
738 853
952
0%
760 820
095 ; 1,137
1,208
120%
1,149 1,231
1,476 1,707
11905
Miami
(Dada)
33%
344 326
391 452
504
36%
322 345
414 4779
634
40%
369 395
474 548
611
45%
415 044
633 rig
087
5
461 494
5812 695
763
60%
553 503
711` 822
gig
W%
737 7911
948 1,096
1222
1214$/
1,1117 1188
1,427 1544
1,$31