Loading...
01-18-05 -Missing Agenda Item 11CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI Inter - office Memorandum TO: Mayor, Vice Mayor & City Commission FROM: Maria V. Davis City Manager C ORDINANCE I I rt DATE: January 18, 2005 AGENDA ITEM No. RE: Ordinance Updating and Modifying the South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, ADOPTING PHASE II PLAN SUPPLEMENT AS UPDATING AND MODIFYING THE SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PROVIDING FOR TRANSMITTING THE PLAN TO THE MIAMI -DADE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; PROVIDING FOR FURTHER ACTIONS TO IMPLEMENT THE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION: The plan supplement to which the attached ordinance refers was passed by the CRA Board at its January 10, 2005 meeting. It requires adoption by the City Commission in order to forward it to Miami -Dade County. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend Commission approval of the Ordinance I ORDINANCE NO. 2 3 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE 4 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, ADOPTING PHASE II PLAN 5 SUPPLEMENT AS UPDATING AND MODIFYING THE SOUTH MIAMI 6 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PROVIDING FOR 7 TRANSMITTING THE PLAN TO THE MIAMI -DADE COUNTY BOARD 8 OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; PROVIDING FOR FURTHER ACTIONS 9 TO IMPLEMENT THE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; 10 PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING AN 11 EFFECTIVE DATE. 12 13 WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission, acting pursuant to the powers vested in it by 14 the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969, which is codified as chapter 163, part III, sections 15 163.330 through 163.450, Florida Statutes, as amended, and Resolution No. R1374 -96, adopted 16 on December 3, 1996, by the County Commission of Miami -Dade County, adopted the South 17 Miami Community Redevelopment Plan by Resolution No. 247 -97- 10217, on November 18, 18 1997; and 19 20 WHEREAS, the adopted redevelopment plan was transmitted to the County Commission of 21 Miami -Dade County, to the County Manager and to other responsible county officials; and 22 23 WHEREAS, pursuant to recommendations by responsible county officials, the City of 24 South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency accepted proposed modifications to the 25 redevelopment plan at its January 10, 2005 meeting and transmitted the proposed modified plan 26 to the Mayor and City Commission and recommended to the Mayor and City Commission that 27 the plan be amended to incorporate the modifications; and 28 29 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 163.346, notice of this proposed action will be given, by 30 registered mail, to each taxing authority which levies ad valorem taxes on taxable real property 31 within the boundaries of the redevelopment area; and 32 33 WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Areas Phase II Supplement is annexed to this 34 ordinance as Appendix. 1. 35 36 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY 37 OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, THAT: 38 39 Section 1. The recitals in the Whereas clauses are true and correct, and incorporated into 40 this ordinance. 41 42 Section 2. The City Commission recommends adoption of the Phase II Plan Supplement. 43 44 Section 3. The City Commission finds that: 45 46 1. The applicable procedural requirements of chapter 163, part III, Florida Statutes, for 47 modifying an adopted community redevelopment plan have been met. 48 49 2. The proposed Phase II Plan Supplement to the redevelopment plan is consistent with, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 and conforms to the City of South Miami Comprehensive Plan. 3. It is in the public interest to adopt the Phase II Plan Supplement to the adopted community redevelopment plan. Section 4. The City Commission concludes that the proposed South Miami Community Redevelopment Phase II Plan Supplement complies with the requirements of section 163.361, Florida Statutes, and furthers the purposes of the Community Redevelopment Act and the delegation of authority by the Board of County Commissioners of Miami -Dade County. Section 5. The South Miami Community Phase II Plan Supplement is amended to incorporate the modifications which are incorporated in the plan that is annexed to this ordinance as Appendix. 1. Section 6. The City Manager, or her designee, is directed to deliver the modified plan to the Board of County Commissioners of Miami -Dade County. and to diligently seek approval of the plan. The City Manager, or her designee, and the CRA Board are also directed to take all appropriate actions to implement the plan. And any further amendments to the plan, including, without limitation, entering into negotiating for an interlocal agreement between the City of South Miami and Miami -Dade County, Florida, relating to tax increment financing and implementing the plan and preparing a redevelopment trust fund document is hereby further authorized. Section 7. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon approval. The South Miami Community Redevelopment Phase II Plan Supplement as amended, shall be in full force and effect upon approval by the South Miami City Commission and the Board of County Commissioners of Miami -Dade County. PASSED AND ADOPTED this ATTEST: CITY CLERK 1 sc Reading 2 °d Reading READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY EX R A \CRA Plan Suppl Ordl.doc day of , 2005 APPROVED: MAYOR COMMISSION VOTE: Mayor Russell: Vice Mayor Palmer: Commissioner Wiscombe: Commissioner Birts- Cooper: Commissioner Sherar: MIAMI DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays Miami, Miami -Dade County, Florida STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADE: Before the undersigned authority personally appeared SOOKIE WILLIAMS, who on oath says that he or she is the VICE PRESIDENT, Legal Notices of the Miami Daily Business Review f /k/a Miami Review, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper,, published at Miami in Miami -Dade County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement,; being a Legal Advertisement of Notice in the matter of CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI - PUBLIC HEARING - JAN. 18, 2005 ORDINANCE ADOPTING PHASE II PLAN SUPPLEMENT, ETC. in the XXXX Court, was published in said newspaper in the issues of 01/07/2005 Affiant further says that the said Miami Daily Business Review is a newspaper published at Miami in said Miami -Dade County, Florida and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Miami -Dade County, Florida, each day (except Saturday; Sunday and Legal Holidays) and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Miami in said Miami -Dade County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he or she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any c unt, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of s cur' g this advertisement for publication in the said new p per. An Sworn to and subscribed before me this 07 PddIARY`" ,A`•R 2005 (SEAL) SOOKIE WILLIAMS personally known to me Maria I. Mesa My Commission DD293855 or Expires March 04, 2008 16 Ln 0 0 N } i Q. z Q Q n Ln D 0 Q Lll 2 LU 0 U m OD 3 3 LLi Are you ready to exp k $ Ta i Chi m 630 Drive, Suite el., 305) 662 -5' Parking at the i Seniors v sense of fitness and well - beingl ay beginning January Tai Chi Society will offer classes to the balance, strength and seniors. d engaging path to physical and wealth. ty of the USA�� South Miami, FL 33143 www.taoistorg of the Building COURTESY NOTICE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA On Tuesday, January 18, 2005, beginning at 7:30 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, 6130 Sunset Drive, the City Commission will hold _ a Public Hearing to consider first reading of the following ordinance: AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING PHASE 11 ELAN SUPPLEMENT AS AN UPDATING AND MODIFYING OF THE SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PROVIDING FOR TRANSMITTING THE PLAN TO THE MIAMI -DADE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY . COMMISSIONERS; PROVIDING FOR FURTHER ACTIONS TO IMPLEMENT THE PLAN. - Inquiries concerning this item should be directed to the Planning Department at 305- 663- 6326. ALL interested parties are invited to attend and will be heard. Maria M. Menendez City Clerk Pursuant to Florida Statutes 286.0165, the City hereby advises the public that if a person decides to appeal any decision. made by this Board, Agency or Commission with respect to any matter considered at its meeting or hearing, he or she will need a record of the proceedings, and that for Such purpose, affected person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. One of the Top S®- Catholic High Schc THE WORWRENoWN10 VIENNA ., -° FRIDAY, JANUART 28, 7 :30.PM r SATURDAY, JANU V' 29; 7 �0 PM`PROGRAm) ~ ST, THOMAS EPISCpPAL PARISH 5690 N. KENDALL DO"'- GbkAL GABLES, FLORIDA , 305= 661 3436 STTHOMASEP.ORG TICKETS; $50, $25:`Skfit1 RS & STuDl,NTS RY�OTORS, PRESENTED BY 61LL 1SSE INC. WITH THE SUPPORT OF THE MIAMI DADS "DEPARTMENT 4fCUC`fURAL,AFFAiRS AND THE CULTURAL AFFAIRS. COUNCIL ;_ y•• THE MIAMI -Dk i COUNTT MAYOR AND the 86ARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, AND' ..- �i WITHJkE.SUPPORT F THE CITY OF CORAL GABLES. ae4 ("ry4 :F „S lu:�,d...fEa )f ibr� A+"i.f..fx���!€ n3 COURTESY NOTICE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA On Tuesday, January 18, 2005, beginning at 7:30 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, 6130 Sunset Drive, the City Commission will hold _ a Public Hearing to consider first reading of the following ordinance: AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING PHASE 11 ELAN SUPPLEMENT AS AN UPDATING AND MODIFYING OF THE SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PROVIDING FOR TRANSMITTING THE PLAN TO THE MIAMI -DADE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY . COMMISSIONERS; PROVIDING FOR FURTHER ACTIONS TO IMPLEMENT THE PLAN. - Inquiries concerning this item should be directed to the Planning Department at 305- 663- 6326. ALL interested parties are invited to attend and will be heard. Maria M. Menendez City Clerk Pursuant to Florida Statutes 286.0165, the City hereby advises the public that if a person decides to appeal any decision. made by this Board, Agency or Commission with respect to any matter considered at its meeting or hearing, he or she will need a record of the proceedings, and that for Such purpose, affected person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. One of the Top S®- Catholic High Schc r City of South Miami Community Redevelopment Area Phase II Plan Supplement (HEARING DRAFT) December 30, 2004 SMCRA BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mary Scott Russell, Chair Velma Palmer, Vice Chairperson Marie Birts- Cooper Craig Z. Sherar Dr. Anna Price Nancy Cobb Randy Wiscombe SMCRA ADVISORY BOARD Lee Perry, Chair Roy Pearson Antoinette Owens David F. Savers CITY MANAGER Maria Davis COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT j Maria Davis, Acting Executive Director Don O'Donniley, Planning Director James McCants, Program Coordinator CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND COMMUNITY FEATURES 7 11. SELECTED DATA AND ANALYSIS UPDATE 3 A. LAND USE AND ZONING 3 B. DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS 9 1. POPULATION ESTIMATES AND TRENDS 9 2. HOUSING 11 3. INCOME AND POVERTY RATES 12 4. EDUCATIONAL LEVELS 15 5. EMPLOYMENT AND BUSINESS 15 C. TRANSPORTATION 16 D. AFFORDABLE HOUSING 21 III. CURRENT AND PLANNED PROJECTS 22 A. MIXED -USE AND RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS 22 B. STREETSCAPE PROJECTS 25 IV. COMMUNITY VISIONING 26 V RECOMMENDED ACTION PLAN 28 A. POLICIES AND ADMINISTRATION 28 B. PROGRAMS 28 C. PROJECTS 31 Vt. REDEVELOPMENT FINANCE & BUDGET PROJECTIONS 37 A. INTRODUCTION 37 B. HISTORICAL AND CURRENT REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES 37 C. PROJECTED REVENUES 38 D. FIVE YEAR BUDGET ESTIMATES 38 APPENDICIES A. 2000 United States Census Tables B. South Miami Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area Profile C. Maximum Income and Rent Levels Established by Florida HUD CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04 DRAFT CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II LIST OF TABLES & FIGURES LIST OF TABLES TABLE 2.1: Adopted Future Land Use Designations and Criteria 5 TABLE 2.2: CRA Zoning Category Criteria 7 TABLE 2.3: CRA Zoning and Land Use Conflicts 8 TABLE 5.1: CRA ACTION PLAN SCHED ULE 35 TABLE 6.1: SMCRA Revenue Trends 37 TABLE 6.2: Projected SMCRA Revenues FY 2006 - 2020 38 TABLE 6.3: Five -Year Budget Plan (Preliminary) 39 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1.1: Key Community Features in the CRA Area 2 FIGURE 2.1: Existing Land Use Map 3 FIGURE 2.2: Adopted Future Land Use Map 4 FIGURE 2.3: CRA Zoning Map 6 FIGURE 2.4: Comparative Racial Profile of Year 2000 Population 10 FIGURE 2.5: Relative Age of Housing Stocks 11 FIGURE 2.6: Median Household Income Comparison 12 FIGURE 2.7: Year 2000 Poverty Status Comparison 13 FIGURE 2.8: Household Percent of Income Spent on Housing by Tenure in CT 76.03 14 FIGURE 2.9: 2000 Educational Attainment in CT 76.03 15 FIGURE 2.10: Existing (1999) CRA Traffic Conditions 17 FIGURE 2.11: Projected (2 010) CRA Traffic Conditions 18 FIGURE 2.12: South Miami Trolley Proposed Route for Fridays & Saturdays 19 FIGURE 2.13: Annual MetroRail Ridership Data - South Miami Station 20 FIGURE 3.1: CRA Mixed -Use and Residential Projects 24 FIGURE 3.2: CRA Street Enhancement Projects 25 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04 DRAFT I. INTRODUCTION AND COMMUNITY FEATURES This Plan is a Phase 11 Supplement to the existing South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan ( "The Plan "), required through an Interlocal Agreement with Miami -Dade County. This Phase II Plan must be approved by the County no later than June 2005 in order to retain CRA designation. All other sections in the approved 1997 -1998 South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan which are not updated in this Supplement remain in full force and effect. This Plan Supplement is based on an extension of the CRA through the year 2020. The South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency (SMCRA) Redevelopment Area was approved and designated by Miami -Dade County in 1999 through Ordinance No. 99 -100. It is composed of approximately 185 acres with a 2004 total taxable value (TTV) of approximately $199,354,475, a 5 year gain of over $130 million total taxable value (Source: the Miami -Dade County Property Appraiser's Office, 12 /14104). This area represents approximately 12.2% of the overall geographic area of the City of South Miami and 20% of the TTV of all properties. As evidenced in Figure 1.1, a number of key community features are located within or near the Redevelopment Area, including municipal buildings, parks, hospitals, educational facilities, and shopping centers. These assets should be utilized to the fullest extent whenever possible and be recognized for their contribution to the area. CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II INTRO & COMMUNITY FEATURES FIGURE 1.1 Key Community Features in the CRA Area g- �r�, > {s .ft aL� 4 $`r x3 Z,14 z URI S7� � � °,ter, �w �r es� r Y r s a!s AA v Aliff ri S40 C .� NE IM Ll J sue.,:' .Y•" g �"+i + ,a,,. �, � c p W.. r i 'M S'Y` y � � ..,.a P✓.�^ sTli- atYG- ,,.... Aerial Photo Source: AirPhoto!USA; 1meter resolution; date taken 4/1/2004 Key Features ® City Hall / Police Station ® Metrorail Station ® Larkin Hospital ® Post Office ® Fire Station South Miami Hospital ® Multi- Purpose Center ®Mobley Building Shops at Sunset Place j Marshall Williamson Park ® JRE Lee Ed Center ® University of Miami f i CITY OF SOUTH MIANZ, FLORIDA 12 -30 - 04 Page 2 DRAFT II. SELECTED ED DA A AND ANALYSIS UPDATE A. LAND USE AND ZONING As evidenced in Figure 2.1, the existing land uses within the South Miami Community Redevelopment Area are primarily single - family and low- density multi- family residential to the north; a mix of single- family, multi - family residential, townhouses, commercial, parks and institutional in the center; and mostly office, commercial, industrial, utilities, and institutional on the south side. Vacant parcels are scattered throughout the area. Earlier this year, a mixed -use development project called the Valencia was constructed at 6001 SW 70th Street. The Miami -Dade County's Existing Land Use map has not been updated to reflect the site's new use so it is depicted in Figure 2:1 as being vacant and commercial use. FIGURE 2.1: Existing Land Use Map Source- Miami -Dade county, April 2003 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA Page 3 LEGEND SMCPk B.0 .ry i+ghnay= $aaels �,f hapriLJad4 $hale :rta U Pmpartsx lPans51 Landux+ 5nga -Far OTnmthauses Tn•J•Fan3,y tGup�xeul 0 tovAensfiy Mus4Farrr_y ituti -Fam]y ffx�rant �ar�s O lbu0a FeonaPahc Shepml Cente.s Cumnsrcal, Sladurrr=. Tr C k 01rw Tans MAss: ntat (tiale'slWalaki lndu51ra1 Eal—t- Indusaar Mstdut:ahaf Parks lin vdng (Poaeanres and Conservation) CamalerzJs YJalar COn9a 1— A,- AipadsJPods COR.retn —il,n . Utti"m Temaixa[s . Plants SlraelslRoatls. Exprassnays. Rams E�assnay Rght of rMa, tlpen 4reas 4g -udura Vacant: Cxrvam 1,-AT d V-1 Lnpmlaclad E3 4Vaar N. 1.0. CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE %% SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE Figure 2.2 shows the adopted Future Land Use designations within the CRA, followed by Table 2.1 below which summarizes the permitted uses and specific dimensional requirements of the land use designations. FIGURE 2.2: Adopted Future Land Use Map CRA PLAN UPDATE — PHASE II SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE TABLE 2.1: Adopted Future Land Use Designations and Criteria Land Use Permitted Uses Maximum Maximum Height Designation Density Single Family Single- family house New parcels = none 2 stories specified Ex. parcels = consistent with surrounding Multi Family Townhouse, Multi - family, 24du /Ac 4 stories mixed -use (retail /office on round level Mixed Use Mixed -Use: retail/office/ 24du /Ac 4 stories Commercial residential Residential Transit Oriented Office, retail, residential, Same as zoning ` Flexible up to 8 stories Development District and mixed -use Residential Office Very low intensity office N/A 2 stories Educational Public schools N/A Average of permitted heights in the surrounding zoning districts, not to exceed 4 stories Public & Institutional Public schools, municipal N/A 4 stories facilities, utilities, churches, temples, synagogues, and similar Parks & Open Space Public parks, park and N/A N/A open space area (including at public schools CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE Figure 2.3 depicts a citywide map of the Zoning Designations with the SMCRA highlighted. Table 2.2 summarizes the permitted uses and specific dimensional requirements of the zoning categories within the CRA. FIGURE 2.3: CRA Zoning Map CRA PLAN UPDATE PHASE II SELECTED DATA & ANALYSTS UPDATE TABLE 2.2: CRA Zoning Category Criteria Zoning Category Permitted Uses Maximum Maximum Density Height Low Density Residential Planned Unit Development None specified 2 stories; 25 ft (RS -3) (special use); Single-family dwelling; Community Residential home (less than 6); home occupation Single Family Residential Planned Unit Development None specified 2 stories; 25 ft (RS-4) (specia( use); Single- family dwelling; Community Residential home (less than 6); home occupation Low Density Multi - Family Planned Unit Development 18du /Ac 2 stories; 30 ft Residential (RM -18) (special use); all other residential uses Low intensity Office (LO) Low intensity office; limited N/A 2 stories; 30 ft business and professional services Medium Intensity Office Medium intensity professional N/A 4 stories; 50 ft MO and business office Neighborhood Retail (NR) Limited business and N/A 2 stories; 25 ft professional services Specialty Retail (SR) Ground floor retail with office N/A 4 stories, 50 ft and residential on the upper floors Transit Oriented Development District TODD Mixed Use 4 (MU-4) Residential uses; commercial Limited only by the 2 stories uses parking provided Mixed Use 5 (MU -5) Residential uses; commercial Limited only by the 2 stories min.; 4 uses parking provided stories max; up to 8 stories with bonus; 100ft Light Industrial 4 (LI-4) Residential uses; commercial Limited only by the 2 stories uses; light industrial use parking p rovided Hospital Hospital (special use); N/A None Specified accessory medical services (special use); chino clinic (special use); labs; medical offices Public Institutional Daycare; municipal uses, N/A Compatible with parks, religious (special use) surrounding districts Parks & Recreation Parks and o ens ace N/A N/A CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE A number of inconsistencies exist between certain zoning district requirements and those of the corresponding Land Use designations. These will need to be rectified in order to facilitate redevelopment efforts. The following inconsistencies have been identified: TABLE 2.3: CRA Zonin g and Land Use Inconsistencies Zoning Category Land Use Conflict Designation Low Density Multi - family Multi Family Residential 1: Zoning permits density of 18du /Ac; Residential (RM -18) Land Use permits density of 24du /Ac 2. Zoning permits '2 stories or 30 ft; Land Use permits 4 stories 3. Land Use of properties near SW 81st Court is Parks and Open Space while zoning is RM -18 4. Land Use of properties near SW 62 "d Avenue is Public and Institutional while zoning is RM -18 Neighborhood Retail (NR) Mixed Use Commercial 1. Zoning does not permit residential Residential or mixed -use; Land Use permits density of 24du /Ac 2. Zoning permits 2 stories or 25 ft; Land Use permits 4 stories Low Intensity Office (LO) Mixed Use Commercial 1. Zoning does not permit residential Residential or mixed -use; Land Use permits density of 24du /Ac 2. Zoning permits 2 stories or 30 ft; Land Use permits 4 stories Medium Intensity Office Mixed Use Commercial 1. Zoning does not permit residential; (MO) Residential Land Use permits density of 24du /Ac Specialty Retail (SR) Mixed Use Commercial 1. Zoning does not permit mixed- Residential use; Land Use permits density of 24du /Ac Hospital Mixed Use Commercial 1. Zoning does not permit residential Residential or mixed -use; Land Use permits density of 24du /Ac Public Institutional Educational & 1. Zoning maximum height is Public and Institutional determined by what is considered compatible with surrounding districts; Land Use permits 4 stories CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE B. DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS The information contained herein was derived from the 2000 Census Summary Files 1 and 3. Summary File 1 includes basic demographic and housing characteristics from the census "short form" which went to all households. This information is readily available with precision down to the Census Block Level. Summary File 3 data are from the census "long form" sent to a sample of one-in- ten households. These data include population, economic, and social measures and are only available down to the Census Block Group Level. Census data was compiled at the Census Block Level for most of the population and housing information contained in this report. Because detailed social, economic and housing information is not available at the Census Block Level, data was also collected at the Census Block Group and Census Tract Levels. Detailed tables are located in Appendix A. The South Miami Community Redevelopment Area consists of a majority of Census Tract 76.03 (58 %). The Census Block Groups (all within CT 76.03) include 76.03:04, 76.03:03 and portions of 76.03:02 (21 %) and 76.03;01(18 %0). These Block Groups that form Census Tract 76.03 hereafter will be referred to as "CT 76.03 ". The following Census Blocks comprise the South Miami Community Redevelopment Area: 76.03:1026 thru 76.03:1033; 76.03:2003; 76.03:2004; 76.03:3000 thru 76.03:3013; and 76.03:4000 thru 76.03:4016. Additionally, the Miami -Dade County Department of Planning and Zoning prepared the South Miami Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area Profile in April of 2003 (See Appendix B). Because the Community Redevelopment Area includes approximately 98% of this South Miami Target Area, the information within that-document was of great assistance in the demographic analysis of this report. I 1.. POPULATION ESTIMATES AND TRENDS I The resident population located within the CRA represents 18% of the City of South Miami's total population. Population growth is as follows: City of South Miami = 1.0 % growth, Population, 1990 = 10,404 Population, 2000 = 10,741 Redevelopment Area = 1.1 % growth, Population, 1990 = 1,700 ` (approximate) Population, 2000 = 1,951 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04 Page 9 DRAFT CRA PLAN UPDATE — PHASE II SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE The redevelopment area almost entirely consists of a' minority community. The 2000 Census figures indicate that 83 % of the residents in the South Miami CRA are Black or African American whereas the City is 25% and County is 20 %. Approximately 13% of the SMCRA residents are White whereas both the City and County are around 70% White. Figure 2.4 illustrates the racial diversity of the Redevelopment Area compared to the City and County. FIGURE 2.4: Comparative Racial Profile of Year 2000 Population � F, oo°io G 80% CL 0 60 %0 0 i-- p 40 % C a� L p, 20% 0% El White 0 Black or African American ❑American Indian and Alaska Native* DAsian • Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander* ®Some other race Miami- Dade South Miami South Miami ka Population of two or more County CRA races Represents less than .4% of total population The South Miami CRA has a relatively young population. In 2000, about 44% of the population was below 25 years of age compared to 31 % in the City and 34% in the County. Approximately 13% were 65 years and over, similar to the City and County percentages (14% and 13 %, respectively). Family households in the Redevelopment Area were less likely to be comprised of married couples (21% compared to 40 %o Citywide and 48% Countywide). The percent of family households headed by a female householder (20 %) was much higher than the City and County percentages (7% and 9 %, respectively). CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04 Page 10 DRAFT CRA PLAN UPDATE — PHASE II SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE 2r HOUSING In 2000, renter- occupied units accounted for 61% of all occupied units in the South Miami CRA, higher than both the City (37 %) and the County (42 %). Vacancy rate for the redevelopment area was 6 %, higher than the City (3 %), but less than the County (9 %). The average household size of occupied housing units within CT 76.03 was 2.84, with an owner - occupied average of 3.62 and renter occupied average of 2.13 persons per household. The average household size of occupied housing units for the City was 2.47 and the County was 2.84. More than 30% of the households in CT 76.03 had 4 persons or more living in the household. As depicted in Figure 2.5, much more of the housing in the City and CT 76.03 is older than newer. More than 64% of the housing in CT 76.03 is more than 35 years old, compared to 73% in the City of South Miami and 45% in the County. FIGURE 2.5: Relative Age of Housing Stocks 40% 35% 30% c 25% O = 20% R w 0 15% O 10% U L a 5% 0% M Miami -Dade County M South Miami O CT 76.03 Source: 2000 Census; Summary File 3 In 2000, the median housing value for all owner occupied homes in CT 76.03 was less than $100,000, while South Miami was $170,100 and Miami -Dade County was $124,000. More than 70% of the owner occupied homes were CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04 Page 11 DRAFT a { °'$�. oil +� °'� 4a ti ��o. X60. � h �9 M Miami -Dade County M South Miami O CT 76.03 Source: 2000 Census; Summary File 3 In 2000, the median housing value for all owner occupied homes in CT 76.03 was less than $100,000, while South Miami was $170,100 and Miami -Dade County was $124,000. More than 70% of the owner occupied homes were CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04 Page 11 DRAFT CRA PLAN UPDATE PHASE II SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE valued at less than $70,000 in CT 76.03, compared to 5% for the City and 8.6% for the County. 3. INCOME AND POVERTY RATES Median household income in the Redevelopment Area is considerably less than that of the City and County as evidenced in figure 2.6. In fact, more than 62% of the households within the SMCRA Census Block Groups had incomes below $35,000, compared to 39% in South Miami and 42% in Miami -Dade County. FIGURE 2.6: Median Household Income Comparison CRA PLAN UPDATE — PHASE II SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE Figure 2.7 depicts the percent of total population that falls below and at or above poverty level. With more than 32% of the population falling below poverty level, poverty is clearly a major issue in the Redevelopment Area compared to the City (17 %) and the County (18 %). FIGURE 2.7: Year 2000 Poverty Status Comparison Source: 2000 Census; Summary File 3 The median monthly gross rent for renter - occupied housing units within CT 76.03 was $570, far below the median monthly gross rent of the City ($ 672) and County ($ 647). Of particular note is that all 144 renter- occupied housing units in South Miami with cash rent less than $300 a month are located within CT 76.03. A significant number of renter households in the Redevelopment Area are paying a considerable amount of their income on gross rent compared to those in the City and County. Nearly 42% of the specified renter households in CT 76.03 are paying more than 30% of their income on housing, compared to 39% of the households in the City and 47% of the households the County. Nearly 38% of the owned households (with and without a mortgage) in the Tract are paying more than 30% of their income on housing, compared to 33% for the City and 37% for the County. CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04 Page 13 DRAFT CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE 7I SELECTED DATA &ANALYSIS UPDATE As shown in Figure 2.8, a significant number of households within CT 76.03 spend more than 30% of their income on housing, particularly rental households. FIGURE 2.8: Household Percent of Income Spent on Housing by Tenure in CT 76.83 10 y y OUR . [TV, I CRA PLAN UPDATE — PHASE IZ SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE 4. EDUCATIONAL LEVELS The educational attainment levels of the redevelopment area's residents continue to lag behind the regional levels. In 2000, nearly 36 %of the population age 25 and older' within CT 76.03 never graduated high school while 18% in the City and 32 % in the County did not graduate. 15% had completed four or more years of college compared to 38% in South Miami and 22% in Miami -Dade County. Figure 2.9 shows the educational attainment breakdown within CT 76.03. 63 % of the total 25 and older population within this area does not have college experience. FIGURE 2.9: 2000 Educational Attainment in CT 76.03 Source: 2000 Census; Summary File 3 5. EMPLOYMENT AND BUSINESS In 2000, 6% of the labor force in CT 76.03 was unemployed, slightly higher than the City and County figures (4% and 5% respectively). About 48 % of area residents over 16 were not in the labor force, i.e., neither employed nor looking for work, compared to South Miami's 36% and Miami - Dade's 43 %. The ability of a household to own a vehicle is a significant indicator of an area's level of distress. According to the 2000 Census, 29% of the occupied households within CT 76.03 do not own a vehicle, with over 20% being renter- CZTY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04 Page 15 DRAFT CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE occupied. Only 12% of the occupied households in the City and 14% in the County do not own a vehicle. Furthermore, occupied households that own 2 or more vehicles comprise only 19% of the area, compared to 36 % in the City and 35% in the County. These figures illustrate the importance of reliable public transportation to the community within the redevelopment area. C. TRANSPORTATION As indicated in Figure 2.10, the major traffic corridors transecting_ the South Miami CRA including Sunset Drive, Red Road, and South Federal Highway /South Dixie Highway are currently operating at or below LOS E. Figure 2.11 depicts that traffic congestion conditions will continue to worsen by Year 2010. However, Miami -Dade County has adopted LOS standards that allow roadways within the Urban Infill Area to operate at 150 % of their capacity because of the presence of extraordinary transit. This was enacted to promote infill development and discourage suburban sprawl. In the 1998 South Miami Community Redevelopment ` Plan, it was anticipated that the advent of the MetroRail stop at the South Miami station and the City of South Miami's adoption of the Transit Oriented Development ordinance in 1997 would help relieve some of the traffic pressures in the area, however traffic congestion remains to be a serious issue for the SMCRA. Certain measures to promote the use of alternative modes of transportation have been proposed to help alleviate traffic congestion in the CRA. As an initiative of The People's Transportation Plan, a Trolley System is being implemented to provide transportation services within the business district, Community Redevelopment Area, City Hall, and Metrorail Station. Funding is proposed to be earmarked from the half -penny transportation surtax, approved by Miami -Dade County voters in 2002. This service is tentatively set to begin operations on January 2, 2005, on Fridays and Saturdays and the First Sunday of each month. Figure 2.12 shows the tentative route. The Miami -Dade MetroRail Transit station located within the CRA is South Miami Station. As depicted in Figure 2.13, annual ridership at this station was at an all- time low of 701,460 riders in 1998. Since then, annual ridership has averaged nearly 840,000 riders, though not through a steady growth trend. CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04 Page 16 DRAFT CRA PLAN UPDATE — PHASE IT SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE FIGURE 2.10: Existing (1999) CRA Traffic Conditions LOS S or better ` -- LOS C a LOS D LOS E LOS r Centroid Connector i 0 h a c2: 1 o° r 6 O ' a.uz RSs o - L,Q7 t ` a t5t t _ QX2 .. Source: Miami -Dade MPO, 2004 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04 Page 17 DRAFT 1 CRA PLAN UPDATE— PHASE H SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE FIGURE 2.11: Projected (2010) CRA Traffic Conditions` - -�-� -� LOS B or better ,. LOS C LOS D j LOS e i LCD F ntroid Connector ytis CRA PLAN UPDATE — PHASE II SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE FIGURE 2,13: Annual MetroRail Ridership Data - South Miami Station :)urce: iwiami -uaae iransn, -ia_iufzuu4 CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II SELECTED DATA & ANALYSIS UPDATE D. AFFORDABLE HOUSING The Plan indicated that from 1980 to 1990, existing housing units in the City of South Miami decreased by a total of 162 units. Census information reveals that the number of existing housing units in the City rebounded about 3% between 1990 to 2000. Similarly, the redevelopment area has seen few new housing units constructed until recently. Given the redevelopment area's unusually high poverty level, the large amount of households spending a significant percentage of their income on housing, predominantly older low -value housing availability, and influx of new service oriented jobs associated with recent retail development, the construction of new affordable housing alternatives should be a vital mission for the SMCRA. Of primary concern is that new "affordable" housing in the area be offered for rent or sale at a rate that the current residents can afford. In general terms, "affordable housing" is dependent upon an income eligible household's ability to spend no more than 30% of its income on either rent or - mortgage payment. Income eligibility is defined in terms of area median income (determined by HUD), adjusted for family size. Categories include "extremely low-income" (at or below 30% of area median income), "very low- income" (at or below 50 % of median income), "low- income" (at or below 80 %0 of median income), and "moderate income" (at or below 120% of area median income; at or below 100% of median income for federal programs), Appendix C depicts the Florida Housing Finance Corporation's 2004 Income Limits Adjusted to Household Size for Miami PMSA used to establish income eligibility and 2004 Maximum Gross Rents by Number of Bedrooms used to establish the rent schedule for each income eligibility category. The 2004 median income for the Miami PMSA is $45,400. Using the charts in Appendix C, it can be derived that in order for for -rent housing to qualify as affordable in the CRA it would need to fall within the range of $275 /month for an efficiency for an "extremely low- income" household to $1,833 /month for a 4- bedroom unit for a "moderate income household. The most predominant housing size, the 3- bedroom unit, ranges from $410 for an "extremely low- income" household to $1,644 for a "moderate income" household. CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA Page 21 12-30-04 DRAFT CURRENT AND PLANNED PROJECTS A. MIXED -USE AND RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS The following projects are either completed, planned or recommended mixed -use or residential projects. Figure 3.1 depicts their location. Madison Square Madison Square is a SMCRA mixed -use redevelopment proposal intended to create an anchor for the north end of the Church Street (a current streetscape improvement project) and to help stimulate revitalization efforts in the area. The City currently owns several of the parcels and is presently assembling the remaining properties. As identified in Table 2.3, there are inconsistencies between the height and density requirements of the Zoning district (Neighborhood Retail) and Land Use designation (Mixed -Use Commercial Residential). Furthermore, while the Land Use designation allows mixed -use development, the Zoning district does not. There issues will need to be resolved prior to redevelopment. Once all of the properties are under City ownership, an RFP will be issued for the construction phase. The Valencia The Valencia Apartment Homes, developed by Realty Development Corporation, the multifamily development arm of The Lane Company, is a $40 million 290+ unit luxury, mid -.rise apartment community plus 6,200 square feet of retail space. Construction commenced winter 2002, with the first units available for occupancy in February 2004. Hometown Station The Hometown Station, developed by Jubilee C.D.C. in association with Masvidal Partners and Permanentia, Inc., is a $16.5 million mid -rise mixed -use infill development complex on the Metrorail site. Phase I of the planned project will consist of an 8 -story office building (160,000 square feet) which will house the County's Housing Agency, 4,000 square ,feet of retail use and 10 live /work apartment units, attached to the existing Metro -rail parking` garage. Phase II will include residential and /or office uses. The development has numerous objectives including new residential 'development initiatives targeted at local minority -owned businesses, increased ridership on the Metrorail line, and positive enhancement of the City of South Miami. The first phase of the project is currently under construction. As identified in Table 2.3, the Land Use designation (Mixed-Use Commercial Residential) allows mixed -use development however the zoning district (Public Institutional) does not. This will need to be resolved prior to the redevelopment of future phases. Some concerns have been raised about whether future phases will be developed. CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04 Page 22 DRAFT CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II CURRENT AND PLANNED PROJECTS South Miami Gardens South Miami Gardens is a planned 7 acre+ public housing project owned and operated by Miami -Dade County. This project is currently in the design and feasibility stage. As identified in Table 2.3, inconsistencies between the height and density requirements of the Zoning (RM -18) and Land Use designation (Multiple- Family Residential) will need to be resolved prior to redevelopment. NE CRA Mixed -Use Site A planned private sector development project has been proposed for this 7 acre+ site located in the TODD zoning district with these development parameters: 400+ market rent dwelling units and approximately 12,000 square feet of ground floor retail including a 1,000 space parking structure. It has been recommended by the City that any development agreement for this site include provisions that the applicant pay for or produce adequate park land or land for recreational purposes to satisfy the impact of development and that at least 5 percent of the multi - family units constructed will be classified and marketed as affordable housing units. Hardee Courts Hardee Courts is a recommended redevelopment project located on approximately one acre. The December 2001 CRA Multi - Family Housing Study suggested rowhouses for this site, which is inconsistent with the Zoning and Land Use limitation of single - family dwellings. This will need to be resolved prior to redevelopment. Hardee Gateway Hardee Gateway is a recommended redevelopment project located on less than one acre. The December 2001 CRA Multi - Family Housing Study suggested townhouses and limited retail uses for this site, which is inconsistent with the Zoning and Land Use limitation of single - family dwellings. This will need to be resolved prior to redevelopment. Central Place Central Place is a recommended redevelopment project located on approximately 1.67 acres. This projects was first recommended in the December 2001 CRA Multi- Family Housing Study and proposes half of the site for multi- family housing and the other for retail including a 13,000 square foot mini- grocery store. CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04 Page 23 DRAFT CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II CURRENT AND PLANNED PROJECTS FIGURE 3.1: CRA Mixed -Use and Residential Projects CRA PLAN UPDATE — PHASE II CURRENT AND PLANNED PROJECTS B. STREETSCAPE PROJECTS A number of streetscape enhancements have been proposed for the CRA by the City, the County, or as a requirement of private sector development approval. A couple of the major projects are shown in Figure 3.2. FIGURE 3.2: CRA Street Enhancement Projects Source: City of South Miami, Planning-Zoning, 2004 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA Page 25 StreetscaDe Proiects* SW 62nd Avenue (County initiative) SW 591h Place/Church Street Dashed indicates planned projects; hatched indicates completed projects IV. COMMUNITY VISIONING On November 18, 2004, a South Miami Community Redevelopment Area Workshop was held to discuss redevelopment issues and help develop a unified vision for the area. A following outline summarizes the key issues and comments that were mentioned by the CRA Board and community at this meeting. SMCRA Community Workshop Key Issues and Comments ➢ Affordable Housing • Provide more single- family homes • Improve the homes on SW 64th Street • Ensure there is ample housing for any households displaced due to new construction • Provide more multi- family housing • Ensure a variety of housing types are developed (townhouses, duplexes, etc) • Require a percentage of affordable housing with commercial development • Identify affordable housing opportunities, such as the corner of SW 58th Street and SW 68th Ave, and the Destiny Lots (5) • Low income housing is needed, not just affordable Economic Development and Business Incentives o Ensure that programs are affordable o Encourage private development o Actively demolish and clear lots as an incentive for redevelopment o Investigate the option of purchasing South Miami Market o Continue the Business Incubator Program o Provide incentives to attract a grocery store chain to locate in the area o Explore more public /private partnerships o The Mobley Building should be a Business Incubator ➢ Infrastructure Improvements o Provide adequate parking facilities o Provide a municipal parking garage, specifically at Sunset Place o Provide infrastructure improvements ➢ Public Safety o Enhance public safety ➢ Education o Daycare centers are lacking in the area o Support the re- opening of J.R.E. Lee School CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04 Page 26 DRAFT CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II COMMUNITY VISIONING • New Business Education Program - • Teach home ownership training and warn against "predatory" lending practices ➢ Tax Base Growth • Ensure greater accountability of CRA revenues • Look at Bonding as an option for financing improvements • Ensure area continues growth trend ➢ Traffic and Transit o Improve the traffic flow ➢ Enhance Bike and Pedestrian Connectivity • Make the area more pedestrian friendly with connections, lighting, and trees • Designate paths to the Metrorail with adequate pedestrian lighting • Provide a sidewalk on one side of SW Progress Road and Commerce Lane Job Training o Continue Job Training Program 9 Land Use and Zoning • Resolve a potential conflict between the commercial zoning in the area and specific retail uses • Ensure consistency with the Comprehensive Plan • Preserve the single - family zoning per the Comprehensive Plan ➢ Community Design o Improve Market Corner with uniform street furniture, coordinated lighting, less pavement, and landscaping. o Improve Commerce Lane o Investigate non - matching residential rehab programs ➢ Financial Management o Provide programs for mortgage counseling / education ➢ General Comments • Ensure public reviewlaccessibility to the Final Plan • Prioritize programs and strategies • Use the East Area as an example of what the CRA wants to become • Do not let the South Miami CRA sunset as the South Beach CRA did CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04 Page 27 DRAFT V. RECOMMENDED ACTION PLAN The following policies, programs and projects were developed to serve as the Action Plan for future redevelopment in the CRA. They were drawn from existing SMCRA strategies and projects, existing CRA conditions, CRA Goals contained in the adopted Plan and public workshop visioning input. The policies, programs and projects presented below ere summarized in Table 5.1, The Action Plan Schedule. A. POLICIES AND ADMINISTRATION 1. Ensure Land Use and Zoning Consistency a. Process land use amendments, as necessary, to eliminate inconsistencies with planned CRA projects. Incorporate into EAR- based amendments in years 2005 -06. b. Process zoning applications, as necessary, to correct any inconsistencies with the Comprehensive Plan land use map and /or planned CRA projects. First priority is Madison Square area. C. Evaluate the appropriateness of revising the City Zoning Code to require a minimum percentage set -aside of affordable housing residential units for mixed use and multi- family projects located in the CRA. d. Develop community design guidelines for the CRA area and adopt into the City's Zoning Code. 2. Maintain Proper CRA Staffing a. Retain and stabilize the full -time CRA Executive Director position. b. Continue Program Coordinator position and retain 2 part -time college students. C. Out- source technical services such as planning, design and engineering. Utilize City resources to maximum extent possible. B. PROGRAMS 1. Commercial Facade Program: Assist local businesses to upgrade business facades a. Provide an average of up to 3 commercial facade loans /grants per year. (maximum amount - $20,000 each) b. Target Church St., Sunset Drive (north side) and Commerce Lane I Progress Road areas for facade upgrades. CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30-04 Page 28 DRAFT CRA PLAN UPDATE- PHASE II RECOMMENDED ACTION PLAN 2. Neighborhood In-fill: Acquire selected lots for single - family detached and townhouse development. a. Work with qualified non- profit housing agencies such as Habitat for Humanities and Greater Miami Neighborhoods. b. Continue to identify and acquire eligible lots. An average of 5 lots per year should be developed. C. Update the vacant land and abandoned buildings inventory annually. 3. Residential Rehabilitation: a. Solicit and select applications for neighborhood rehabilitation projects. b. Fund an average of 6 projects per year to completion. 4. Residential Paint/Fix -up: a. Supply materials /volunteer labor to renters /homeowners to paint and fix buildings, and install landscaping. b. Provide 5 (material) grants per year @ average of $2,500 per grant. 5. Enhanced Public Safety / Code Enforcement: a. Continue employment of extra police officer and additional Code Enforcement officer for this area. b. Keep annual statistics on all crime types for CRA area to document performance of program to County and CRA Board. C. Continue aggressive code enforcement program especially properties with absentee landlords. Place and enforce liens for noncompliance. Match code cases with CRA programs such as commercial /residential rehabilitation and paint/fix up. 6. Scholarship Work/Study: a. Continue the Agency's program in this area by retaining 2 college students from the CRA area to work as part -time employees for the CRA or agencies doing work within the CRA, primarily during the summer months. 7. Job Identification, Matching and Training: a. Maintain and update on a monthly basis a list of eligible unemployed CRA residents to provide to the County -wide Workforce Coalition, area contractors, and companies locating in the CRA area for employment opportunities. CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04 Page 29 DRAFT CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II RECOMMENDED ACTION PLAN b. Assist CRA residents with basic educational and /or specific job skills through the Workforce agency, University of Miami or other job training resources. C. Currently there is a community need for persons in the health service industry, including nurses and medical assistants. Work with Larkin Hospital and South Miami Hospital to facilitate training and possible employment at those institutions, and other clinics and medical offices in the area. d. Prepare an analysis of the daycare and after school care needs in the CRA area. If significant needs are identified, encourage the location of new daycare centers and help existing centers expand through flexible zoning and /or financial incentives 8. Business Attraction and Start -up Assistance: a. Provide interest -free loans to business start -ups and expanding small businesses in the CRA area. Maximum 3 -year term loans of up to $5,000 for each new job to be created. b. Seek a small- scale neighborhood market for location in the CRA area. C. Work with the Beacon Council and local Chamber of Commerce to attract new businesses to the CRA area. 9. Mortgage Subsidy Guarantees: a. Working with local non - profits and banking institutions, provide a funding pool to serve a "gap financing" for first time homebuyers and other eligible persons in residing in the CRA. Funding will be the form of "soft second" mortgages with repayment to the CRA when the unit is sold. No such mortgage should exceed 5 % of purchase price. b. An average of 4 or more applications per year should be approved and implemented within budgetary constraints. 10. Education: a. Work with the County School Board to accelerate the priority of re- opening J.R.E. Lee School as an elementary school. 11. "Friendly Green Streets" Bikeway and Pedestrian Plan: a. If not addressed in the forthcoming ` Evaluation and Appraisal Report (E.A.R.),`develop a CRA -wide Friendly Green Streets Plan which interconnects with areas outside the CRA and fills in the gaps in the bikeway and sidewalk system within the CPA. CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04 Page 30 DRAFT CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II RECOMMENDED ACTION PLAN b. The E.A.R. and /or Plan should also assess the feasibility of narrowing the pavement on selected residential streets, such a SW 66th Street, to provide more area for bikeways, sidewalks, medians` and street trees. Identify a street tree palette for the CRA. C. In FY 2007, allocate $50,000 for development of the Plan with cost estimates or construction of facilities. Seek County and State grant funds to help offset costs. d Program construction funding in future years based on cost estimates provided by the approved E.A.R. and /or Plan. 12. Pedestrian Street Lighting Program: Provide decorative, "soft" pedestrian lighting with sufficient intensity to make pedestrians feel secure and able to see well at nighttime rather than high - intensity amber (crime) lighting as follows: a. Add additional lighting at Marshall Williamson Park. b. Provide new or enhanced lighting at all intersections in the CRA. C. Designate well - lighted paths accessing the MetroRail Station. C. PROJECTS 1. Mobley Building: a. Feasibility of using entire building as a business incubator should be evaluated, possibly in partnership with an academic institution such as the University of Miami. b. If business incubator is not feasible, provide space (1 -4 bays) for non- profit and /or social services agencies such as community health clinic, job training, employment services, after school care and /or full - service daycare. C. If space is still available following efforts to occupy space by non- profit agencies or incubator, that area may be rented to for - profit companies. 2. Madison Square Redevelopment: a. Use Multi - Family Housing Study as basis for redevelopment, and update that study as necessary. b. Assemble remaining vacant properties in 2005 and the remaining non- vacant properties by 2007. C. Prepare RFP for public bid, select development company and execute contract for redevelopment by January 2006. d. Make land use amendments and zoning revisions necessary for feasible redevelopment. e. Complete redevelopment construction by 2007 -2008. CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04 Page 31 DRAFT CPA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE IT RECOMMENDED ACTION PLAN 3. Hardee Courts Redevelopment: a. Use Multi - Family Housing - Study as basis for redevelopment, and update that study as necessary. b. Initiate property assemblage in 2008 C. Make land use amendments and zoning revisions necessary for feasible redevelopment. d. Complete redevelopment by 2010. 4. Hardee Gateway Redevelopment: a. Use Multi- Family Housing Study as basis for redevelopment, and update that study as necessary. b. Initiate property assemblage in 2009 C. Make land use amendments and zoning revisions necessary for feasible redevelopment. d. Complete redevelopment by 2011. 5. Central Place Redevelopment: a. Use Multi- Family Housing Study as basis for redevelopment, and update that study as necessary. b_ Initiate property assemblage in 2010 C. Complete redevelopment by 2012. 6. South Miami Gardens: a. Work with Miami -Dade County to develop feasible plan for redevelopment on a phased basis by 2006. b. Allocate funding in future years for fair share of project costs as County- sponsored redevelopment_ occurs. C. Help coordinate relocation plan that assures that any displaced residents are relocated on site after completion of construction. 7. Church Street Beautification: a. Construct the Phase II Church Street design plan for area south of SW 64th Street to SW 69th Street by 2006. b. Continue to seek County and State grant funds to help offset design and /or construction costs. c. Program construction funding in future years based on cost estimates provided by above plan. CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04 Page 32 DRAFT CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II RECOMMENDED ACTION PLAN 8. East Side Parking Garage: a. Solicit RFP bids for private developer to build parking garage on parcel owned by City by 2007. b. Complete construction by 2009. 9. Commerce Lane /Progress Road: a. Allocate $35,000 in FY 2006 for preparation for a Streetscape Design and Improvement Plan addressing parking, traffic and pedestrian flows, landscaping, building facades, and lighting. b. Seek County and State grant funds to help offset costs. C. Program construction funding in future years based on cost estimates provided by the approved Plan. 10. Trolley Circulator: a. Assess ridership quarterly and make route adjustments accordingly. 11. Pedestrian Bridge Over U.S. 1: .a. In coordination with the Miami -Dade County Transit Agency assess the feasibility of a unique, architecturally - pleasing aerial crosswalk over U.S. 1 between the east side commercial and the South Miami MetroRail Station areas. b. Seek funding for the project from the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) in year 2007 C. Complete construction by year 2009. 12. David D. Bethel Pavilion a Construct pavilion at Marshall Williamson Park by October 2005. 13. Private Development Projects: a. Facilitate the redevelopment of the 7 -acre site located southwest of the intersection of SW 66th Street and Red Road, consistent with the vision for the CRA area. b. Provide assistance, as necessary, for development of the Hometown Station Project and seek commitment from the developer to provide 100 units of senior /moderate income housing. C. Working with the Chamber of Commerce, Beacon Council and other business groups, identify new development projects in the CRA and facilitate their development through infrastructure CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04 Page 33 DRAFT CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II RECOMMENDED ACTION PLAN assistance grants, appropriate land use and zoning revisions and other means consistent with the CRA Plan. d. Explore using the CRA's 501 c3 status in order to obtain grants that will assist in financing new housing and rehabilitation of housing, including low and moderate income housing: CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04 Page 34 DRAFT �+ U H y Z Q i QqIU t c c 6 3 4 x 3 i r C x n d CD ly jo ®r ir ly l�b'214 L£ abed is0 -0£ -ZT V(71210 7-4 'zwyx / Hunos d0 AII0 6u;un000e S ;unoo o; anp s ;uau;snipe aouw o; ;oafgnS "b00Z oaQ W•spoy;au } :eoanoS %L 99L` LSL$ I £5L` L L9$ ZEL`999$ OE17`EL9$ 690`OOL$ JIl -1viol %9V ZZS`LZE$ 66£'LOE$ LLE`8££$ ti96`6E£$ 9ti£'98£$ d11 epe(3-!We1W %5£ EZ`t7Zib$ tbS£`OLE$ SSE`LZ£$ 99ti'££E$ EZL`bLE$ d1.L !welW ujnoS g!1MOJE) % JeaA 5 vo-co JU co-ZO AJ ZO- W Ad W-00 A=l 00-66 Ad aoJnoS anuanaN spuaJl enuana�{ b-�IOWS : �'9 3-J8b'1 �(}!� pue AlunoO agl wojj sanuanaa dil u! 99L` L9L$ panlaoaa V�JOWS aql `ti00Z Ad ul -aeeA dad %%t7' G ao %L uaaq seq po!Jad legl Jano senuanW �Il u! 41nnoJ6 'lleaan0 -000Z Ad aou!s V DONS eq aoj puail anuanaa aqj snnogs moleq �'9 elgel '!wgVV glnoS }o Al!O agl `se llann se `A ;unoo aped -!we!W woad s ;uewAed (j11) 6u!oueu!j luawaaou! xel pan!aoaJ seal aw!l legl 6u!jnp pue sieeA g Alalew!xoidde aol 6ullejado uaaq seq V2jOAS aq_L S3dn11aN3dX3 ONV S3nN3/132f 1N3HHnO ONV 7VOIHOIS11-1 '8 •salnlelS eppol_� pue luawaeAV leoolaalul !we!lN glnoS / Ajunoo epeQ- !weiVy eq; gl!nn eouepa000e ui lno palaaeo eq ll!nn sseooJd s!ql 'jeeA leos!l goee jo 6u!uu!6aq eql le smel -AS peldope sl! gl!M eouepaodoe u! wei6oad �jonn pue la6pnq lenuue ue ldope llegs paeog ay1 •spunl.lo aanl!puedxe og!oads Aue of paeoq b'�j:DWS eql pwwoo jou seop pue Aluo sasodind 6uiuueld ao paaedaid si ueld la6pnq aeeA -9 aql -V IOWS eqj aoj salewllse a.rnl!puedxe (aeeA 5) wjal -}jogs pue suo!loafoid anuanaa (JeeA 5 �) WJel -6uol sluesaad uo!loes slgl NO/1Onaodi / 'v SNOI133rONd 13Jans 19 3:)NVNI-4 IN3WdO13Ammi 'IA REDEVELOPMENT FINANCE CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II & BUDGET PROJECTIONS C. PROJECTED REVENUES Table 6.2 below presents the projected TIF revenues for the SMCRA through FY 2020. The revenue projections were based on a combination of historical growth trends and known projects in the CRA either under construction or planned. The projections` start with FY 2005(10 -1 -04 to 9- 30 -05). TABLE 6.2: 'Projected SMCRA Revenues FY 2005 - 2020 Year Taxable Property Base (prior year in millions) Incremental Tax Base Growth (in millions) County Tax Increment Payment City Tax Increment Payment Total CRA Increment Revenue FY 2005 $ 198.9 $ 130.5 $ 333,555* $ 446,972* $780,527 2006 235.2 166.8 494,979 614,908 1,109,887 2007 242.3 173.9 516,048 641,082 1,157,130 2008 264.4 196.0 581,630 722,554 1,304,184 2009 309.8 241.4 716,355 889,992 1,606,347 2010 304.3 235.9 700,033 869,645 1,569,678 -_2 -014- -3 -1 -8 (�- - - 249. -6- - 740,688. .: -9z0 -150 - - -- ._,..1;660,838- 2012 332.3 263.9 783,123 972,867 1,755,990 2013 347.3 278.8 827,339 1,027,796 1,855,135 2014 362.9 294.5 873,929 1,085,674 1,959,603 2015 379.2 310.8 922,299 1,145,764 2,068,063 2016 396.3 327.9 973,043 1,208,803 2,181,846 2017 414.1 345.7 1,025,865 1,274,423 2,300,288 201.8 432.7 364.3 1,081,060 1,342,991 2,424,051 2019 452.2 383.8 1,138,927 1,414,878 21553,805 2020 472.5 404.1 1,199,167 1,489,715 2,688,882 Totals - -- - -- _ $12.9 million $16.1 million $;29.0 million * Actual County payment and City budget amounts. Assumptions: 1998 base year taxable value = $68.4 million; 3% taxable base growth rate per year though 2009 and 4.5% thereafter. Valencia building value (net $30.3 million) added in 2006, Hometown Station (net $14.8 million) added in 2008 and deleted in 2010, and 7 -acre northeast CRA mixed use site in 2009 ($37.5 million); 5.935 County millage rate; 7.373 City millage. D. FIVE YEAR BUDGET ESTIMATES Based on the revenue projections and the Action Plan presented previously, the SMCRA has developed an estimated 5 -year schedule of revenues and expenditures presented In Table 6.3. CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04 Page 38 DRAFT REDEVELOPMENT FINANCE CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II & BUDGET PROJECTIONS TABLE 6.3: Five -Year Bud et Plan (Prelimina ) CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04 Page 39 DRAFT FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 Totals Revenues: Count TIF $494,979 $516,048 $581,630 $716,355 $700,033 $3,009,045 City TIF 614,908 641,082 722,554 889,922 869,645 3,738,111 Other Revenues 20,000 25,000 25,000 30,000 30,000 130,000 Total Revenues 1,129,887 1,182,130 1,329,184 1,636,277 1,599,678 $ 6,877,156 Ex enditures: Commercial Fagade $60,000. $80,000 $80,000 $130,000 $100,000 $450,000 Neighborhood Infill, 150,000 175,000 175,000 210,000 160,000 870,000 Residential Rehab. 15,000 30,000 30,000 35,000 25,000 135,000 Public Safety /Code Enforcement 140,000 160,000 160,000 210,000 210,000 880,000 WorkfStudy- -10,00U -1-0 -;0-00 - T2;500 15,000 15,000 62,500 Job Training 30,000 40,000 50,000 70,000 50,000 240,000 Business Attraction / Start-ups 30,000 30,.000 30,000 30,000 - 40,000 160,000 Mortgage Guarantees 40,000 60,000 80,000 90,000 80,000 350,000 Bike /Ped. Plan - - -- 50,000 80,000 100,000 90,000 320,000 Lighting Program - - -- 40,000 65,000 140,000 140,000 385,000 Mobley Bldg. 35,000 25,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 90,000 Madison Square 140,000 75,000 50,000 - - -- - - -- 265,000 Hardee Courts - - -- - - -- 150,000 65,000 35,000 250,000 Hardee Gateway - - -- - - -- - - -- 100,000 50,000 150,000 Central Place - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- 200,000 200,000 Church St. 125,000 50,000 50,000 - - -- - - -- 225,000 East Side Parking 10,000 10,000 - - -- - - -- 20,000 Commerce Lane 35,000 75,000 50,000 100,000 50,000 310,000 Trolley 35,000 20,000 - -- - - -- - -- 55,000 Pedestrian Bridge over us 10,000 10,000 - - -- - - -- - - -- 20,000 Bethel Pavilion 25,000 - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- 25,000 Administration 200,000 205,000 220,000 260,000 270,000 1,155,000 Contingency 39,887 37,130 36,684 71,277 74,678 259,656 Total 1,129 887 1,182,130 1,329,184 1,636,277 1,599,678 $ 6,877,156 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -30 -04 Page 39 DRAFT CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II APPENDIX A TABLE A.1 - 2000 Population By Race (Persons) ODUIGC. GVVV UtNibuS, ourrnmary rue i CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA Miami- Dade County South Miami South Miami CRA Total Population 2,253,362 10,741 1,951 Population of one race: 2,167,940 10,512 1,904 White alone 1,570,558 7,502 252 Black or African American alone 457,214 2,653 1,629 American Indian and Alaska Native alone 4,365 15 2 Asian alone 31,753 150 7 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 799 4 0 Some other race alone 103,251 188 14 Po ulation of two or more races 85,422 229 47 ODUIGC. GVVV UtNibuS, ourrnmary rue i CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II APPENDIX A TABLE A.2 - 2000 Population By Sex And Age (Persons) Age -Group Miami- Dade County South Miami South Miami CRA Total Male Population 1,086,558 5,169 879 Under 5 Years 73,996 317 69 5 - 9 Years 81,365 358 104 - 10 -14 Years 81,320 356 118 15 -19 Years 78,156 304 89 20 -24 Years 71,525 358 54 25 -34 Years 165,462 779 97 35-44 Years 183,197 899 103 45 -54 Years 133,271 723 77 55 -64 Years 96,070 490 77 65 -74 Years 72,404 345 69 75 -84 Years 38,397 191 16 85 Years And Older 11,395 29 6 Total- Female Population 1,166,804 5,572 1,072 Under 5 Years 70,854 314 84 5 - 9 Years 77,988 354 92 10 -14 Years 78,324 347 97 15 -19 Years 76,022 293 82 20 -24 Years 72,023 316 64 -25 -34 Years 167,961 803 139 35 -44 Years 187,302 915 148 45 -54 Years 147,727 787 109 55 -64 Years 110,482 544 99 65 -74 Years 90,454 448 80 75 -84 Years 60,9141 319 43 85 Years And Older 26,7531 132 35 Source: 2000 Census; Summary File 1 TABLE A.3 Household Characteristics (Households) Miami -Dade South Miami South Miami CRA Households 776,774 4,301 670 Families 548,493 2,593 423 Married Couple Families 370,898 1,739 140 With Own Children 175,547. 726 54 Other family 177,595 854 283 No Wife/With Children 16,889 80 19 No Husband/With Children 70,316 318 136 CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II APPENDIX A TABLE A.4 - Housing And Tenure Characteristics (Housing Units) Source: 2000 Census; Summary File 1 TABLE A.5 - Average Household Size of Occupied Units by Tenure Average Household Size Miami -Dade South Miami South Miami CRA Housing Units 852,278 4,557 709 Occupied 776,774 4,393 670 Owner 449,325 2,673 261 Renter 327,449 11628 409 Vacant 75,504 156 39 For Rent 19,866 47 13 For Sale 9,855 24 1 Rented /Sold, Not Occupied 5,022 21 3 Seasonal /Occasional Use 29,587 28 2 For Migrant Workers 59 0 0 Other 11,115 361 20 Source: 2000 Census; Summary File 1 TABLE A.5 - Average Household Size of Occupied Units by Tenure Average Household Size Miami -Dade County South Miami SMCRA Census Tract 76.03 Total 2.84 2.47 2.84 Owner occupied 3.01 2.79 3.62 Renter Occupied 2.61 1.97 2.13 Source: 2000 Census; Summary File 3 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -23 -04 DRAFT CRA PLAN UPDATE PHASE II APPENDIX A TABLE A.6 - 2000 Age of Housing Time Period Built Miami -Dade County South Miami SMCRA Census Tract 76.03 1999 - March 2000 14,019 8 0 1995-1998 50,523 77 36 1990-1994 64,968 55 19 1980-1989 155,186 260 107 1970-1979 191,906 824 294 1960-1969 142,827 1,080 293 1950-1959 140,635 1,561 263 1940-1949 56,783 428 186 1939 Or Earlier 35,431 260 51 Total 852,278 4,5531 1,249 Source: 2000 Census; Summary File 3 TABLE A.7 - Value Of Specified Owner - Occupied Housing (Occupied Units) Value Range ($) Miami -Dade County South Miami SMCRA Census Block Groups Less Than 50,000 8,856 25 48 50,000 - 69,999 20,119 94 251 70,000 - 89,999 52,030 179 37 90,000 - 99,999 33,286 93 43 100,000 - 124,999 55,813 128 25 125,000 - 149,999 54,149 332 19 150,000 - 174,999 34,607 402 0 175,000 - '199,999 18,907 222 0 200,000 And More 58,048 875 0 Total 335,815 2,350 423 Median Value $124,000 $170,100 BG1'= $92,300 BG2 = $81,500 BG3 = $60,700 BG4 = $0 CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II APPENDIX A TABLE A.8 - Monthly Gross Rent (Renter- Occupied Housing Units) Gross Rent/Month ($) Miami -Dade County South Miami SMCRA Census Tract 76.03 With Cash Rent 317,690 1,666 603 Less Than 200 19,076 110 110 200-299 11,302 34 34 300-499 53,881 222 134 500-749 125,095 708 121 750-999 69,880 402 155 1,000 - 1,499 30,560 113 32 1,500 And More 7,896 77 17 No Cash Rent 9,143 77 17 Median $ 647 Per Month $ 672 Per Month $570 Per Month Source: 2000 Census; Standard File 3, Summary File 3. TABLE A.9 - 2000 Household Income Income Range ($ /year) Miami -Dade County South Miami SMCRA Census Block Groups Less than 10,000 107,901 571 303 10,000 - 14,999 58,409 285 100 15,000 - 19,999 55,140 274 105 20,000 - 29,999 108,489 547 231 30,000 - 39,999 93,835 363 122 40,000 - 49,999 76,798 391 86 50,000 - 59,999 61,726 273 65 60,000 - 74,999 67,807 278 58 75,000 - 99,999 63,132 581 40 100,000 and more 84,141 722 86 Total Households 777,378 4,285 1,196 Median per year $35,966 $42,488 BG1 = $31,983 BG2 = $25,104 BG3 = $.14,913 BG4 = $24,444 Source: 2000 Census; Standard File 3, Summary File 3. CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -23 -04 DRAFT CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II APPENDIX A TABLE A.10 -2000 Population For Whom Poverty Status Is Determined Poverty Status Miami -Dade South Miami SMCRA Less Than 15% County 211 Census Tract 15%-19% 36,384 205 76.03 Income Below Poverty Level 396,995 1,864 1,097 Income At Or Above Poverty 1,812,094 9,041 2,306 Level 26,566 124 10 Total 1 2,209,089 1 10,905 1 3,403 Source: 2000 Census; Standard File 3, Summary File 3. TABLE A.11 Gross Rent As 'A Percentage Of Household Income Percent Of Income Spent. Miami -Dade. South Miami SMCRA " On Gross Rent County Census Tract 76.03 Less Than 15% 39,402 211 106 15%-19% 36,384 205 62 20%-24% 38,300 198 68 25%-29% 35,117 230 84 30%-34% 26,566 124 10 35% or More 127,500 556 250 Not Computed 23,564 219 40 Total 326,833 1,743 620 Source: 2000 Census; Standard File 3, Summary File 3. CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II APPENDIX A TABLE A.12 - Monthly Owner Costs As A Percentage Of Household Income Percent Of Income Spent On Gross Housing Costs Miami -Dade County South Miami SMCRA Census Tract 76.03 - Housing Units With A Mortgage 258,002 1,809 308 Less Than 10% 11,651 127 8 10%-14% 28,079 190 46 15%-19% 39,147 381 46 20%-24% 39,125 242 41 25%-29% 31,322 199 40 30%-34% 23,013 153 26 35%-39% 16,779 75 12 40%-49% 21,477 136 15 50% Or More 45,189 298 74 Not Computed 2,220 8 0 Housing Units Without A Mortgage 77,813 541 115 Less Than 10% 26,847 253 38 10%-14% 1 6,194 57 22 15%-19% 9,090 42 19 20%-24% 6,033 39 0 25%-29% 4,230 29 6 30%-34% 2,998 46 10 35%-39% 2,069 8 8 40%-49% 3,049 35 0 50% Or More 5,802 32 5 Not Computed 1,501 0 7 Source: 2000 Census; Standard File 3, Summary File 3. TABLE A.13 - Tenure By Vehicles Available (Households) Vehicles Available Miami -Dade County South Miami SMCRA Census Tract 76.03 Owner - Occupied None 29,059 166 114 1 Vehicle 148,947 879 222 2 Vehicles 187,586 1,178 160 3 Vehicles 60,280 338 64 4 Or More Vehicles 23,461 81 9 Renter- Occupied None 82,264 342 234 1 Vehicle 152,553 899 290 2 Vehicles 75,670 445 104 3 Vehicles 12,953 55 0 4 Or More Vehicles 4,001 0 0 Source: 2000 Census; Standard File 3, Summary File 3. CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -23 -04 DRAFT CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II APPENDIX A TABLE A.14 -2000 Educational Attainment (Persons Age 25 and Older) Education Status Miami -Dade County South Miami SMCRA Census Tract 76.03 Male 700,196 3,464 947 Not High School Graduate 222,658; 525 334 High School Graduate 150,726 628 253 - 1 -3 Years College 162,019 867 162 4 Years of College + 164,793 1,444 198 Female 791,593 4,044 1,159 Not High School Graduate 256,695 850 417 High School Graduate 182,271 727 325 1 -3 Years College 194,021 1,054 295 4 Years of College + 158,606 1,413 122 Total 1,491,789 7;508 2,106 Source: 2000 Census; Summary File 3. TABLE A.15- Sex By Employment Status (Population 16 Years and Older) Sex/EmploymentStatus- Miami -Dade County South Miami SMCRA Census Tract 76.03 Total Labor Force 1;758,374 8,687 2,500 Male In Labor Force 834,320 535,323 4,071 2,880 1,122 659 In Armed Services 1,222 0 0 Civilian 534,101 2,880 659 Employed 493,524 2,691 1 592 Unemployed 40,577 189 67 Not In Labor Force 298,997 1,191 463 Female In Labor Force 924,054 475,642 4,616 2,651 1,378 648 In Armed Services 287 0 0 Civilian 475,355 2,651 648 Employed 427,684 2,527 560 Unemployed 47,671 124 88 Not In Labor Force S •2 448,412 1,965 730 ource. 000 Census, Standard File 3, Summary File 3. CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -23 -04 DRAFT SOUTH MIAMI NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION STRATEGY AREA PROFILE Research Section Miami -Dade County Department of Planning & Zoning 111 NW 1 Street, Suite 1220 Miami, Florida 33128 -1972 April 2003 This i Revitali These Preface of a series of short profiles of Neighborhood Strategy Areas in Miami -Dade County, Florida. targeted for assistance by the Miami -Dade County These profiles present data from the 2000 Census, Summary Files 1 and 3. Summary File 1 includes basic demographic and housing characteristics from the census "short form" which went to all households. Summary File 3 data are from the census "long fom3," sent to a sample of one-in-ten households in Miami -Dade. These data include economic and social measures such as income, poverty, employment, and education. Where possible, data from 2000 are compared to 1990 and 1980 data to describe change in these communities. Support for these profiles was provided by the Miami -Dade County Office of Community and Economic Development. South Miami The South Miami Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area is a Black community in the City of South Miami. It is a low-income and high- poverty area. The poverty rate for persons in 2000 was 49 percent, up from the 38 percent recorded in 1990. The percent of families in poverty grew from 38 to 43 percent. Households in South Miami were more likely to rent than own their housing units. Home values and rents were well below the County average. South Miami residents had a lower level of educational attainment than the County average. In sum, the South Mann Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area showed some population and housing growth, but showed increasing poverty levels. The area continues to face a range of serious social and economic challenges. 1 t . Lj !' .# IS L�Ix S-4 CS ET itr�s t E c i;_ 17 z-0 � � D 0 VII �n ��' Introduction The South Miami Revitalization Area is located in the City of South Miami in a roughly rectangular area -bounded by SW 62 Street on the north; SW 62 Avenue on the West; and SW 72 Street on the south. The eastern boundary is SW 57 Avenue between SW 72 and 64 Streets; then west to SW 59th Avenue and north to SW 62 Street. Originally known as Larkins, the area has a long history as a tightly -knit Black settlement. The first Black settler, Marshall Williams, arrived in 1912 from Madison, Florida. He bought land in Larkins and encouraged other Black residents of Madison to do likewise. Through the 1920s the economy depended largely on the railroad, which was used to ship fruits and vegetables. Demographic Characteristics Total Population The 2000 population of 2,091 was an increase over the 1,726 recorded in 1990, reversing a downward trend in the 1980s. Black and Hispanic Population The South Miami NRSA was a Black community (92 percent) in 2000 as it has been for many decades. Hispanics were 11 percent of the population up from the 6 percent reported in 1990. 3 Table 1 Population by Race and Hispanic Origin South Miami and Miami -Dade County 1980-2000 Change Change 1980 80 to 90 1990 90 to 00 2000 Total 1,872 -146 1,726 365 2,091 Black 1,750 -161 1,589 201 1,790 Hispanic 91 4 95 132 227 White 111 -16 95 181 276 Non Hispanic White 53 -14 39 49 88 Non Hispanic Black 1,721 -143 1,578 189 1,767 Percent Total 100% -8% 100% 21% ._, 1000/o Black 93% -9% 92% 13% 86% Hispanic 5% 4% 6% 139% 11% White 6% -14% 6% 191% 13% Non Hispanic White 3% -26% 2% 126% 4% Non Hispanic Black 92% -8% 91% 12% 85% Miami -Dade Total 100% 19% 100% 16% 100% Black 17% 42% 21% 21% 21% Hispanic 36% 64% 49% 35% 57% White 78% 12% 73% 15% 72% Non Hispanic White 46% -22% 30% -19% 21% Non Hispanic Black 17% 37% 19% 20% 20% Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population and Housing, Summary Tape File IA, Florida, 1980, 1990. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000, Summary File 1, Miami-Dade County Department of Planning and Zoning, Research Section, 2003. 4 Age Like many Black communities, South Miami has a relatively young population. About 56 percent of the population was below 35 years of age compared to 48 percent in the County. About 12 percent were 65 years and over, compared to 14 percent in the County. Table 2 Age Distribution South Miami and Miami -Dade County 1980 -2000 South Miami Miami -Dade 1980 1990 2000 1980 1990 2000 Total Persons 1,872 1,726 2,091 1,623,781 1,937,094 2,253,362 Less than 5 161 184 169 94,237 139,714 157,871 5 to 9 167 158 205 101,385 131,426 145,752 10 -14 199 162 232 111,386 120,490 160,754 15 -19 222 169 187 136,285 131,060 154,989 20 -24 200 135 127 133,039 139,196 144,721 25 -29 151 128 119 125,898 168,342 163,859 30 -34 88 117 132 114,333 163,334 173,574 35 -44 182 182 270 192,585 278,043 361,966 45 -54 165 163 203 187,309 212,098 282,766 55 -59 68 61 88 90,929 91,769 109,141 60 -64 53 67 99 80,555 90,816 97,417 65 -74 149 93 155 149,491 146,131 162,257 75+ 67 107 105 105,698 124,675 138,295 South Miami Miami -Dade Total Persons 100% 100% 100% 100 % 100% 100% Less than 5 90/0 11% 8% 6% 7% 7% 5 to 9 9% 9% 10% 6% 7% 6% 10 -14 11% 9% 11% 7% 6% 7% 15 -19 12% 10% 9% 8% 7% 7% 20 -24 11 % 8% 6% 8% 7% 6 % 25 -29 8% 7 % 6% 8% 9% 7% 30 -34 5% 7% 6% 7% 8% 8 % 35 -44 10% 11% 13% 12% 14 % 16% 45 -54 9% 9% 10% 12% 11% 13 % 55 -59 4% 4% 4% 6% 5% 5% 66 -64 ' 3% 4% 5% 5% 5% 4 %° 65 -74 8% 5% 7% 9% 8% 7 % 75+ 4% 6% 5% 7% 6% 6% Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population and Housing, Summary Tape File 1A, Florida, 1980 and 1990. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000, Miami -Dade County Department of Planning and Zoning, Research Section, 2003. 5 Household Structure. Households in South Miami were less likely to be comprised of married couples (32 percent compared to about 68 percent Countywide). The percent of family households headed by a female householder (58 percent) was much higher than the County average (24 percent). Table 3 Households by Family Status South Miami and Miami -Dade County 1990 -2000 South Miami Miami -Dade Change Change 1990 90 to 00 2000 1990 90 to 00 2000 Total Households 544 170 714 692,355 84,419 776,774 Family Households 353 101 454 481,260 67,233 548,493 Married Couple 121 25 146 342,512 28,386 370,898 With children 71 -15 56 164,216 11,331 175,547 No children 50 40 90 178,296 17,055 195,351 Male Householder 36 7 43 35,377 8,547 43,924 With children 21 0 21 17,177 -288 16,889 No children 15 7 22 18,200 8,835 27,035 Female householder 196 69 265 103,371 30,300 133,671 With children 156 -12 144 64,848 5,468 70,316 No children 40 81 121 38,523 24,832 63,355 Non- family Households 191 69 260 211,092 17,189 228,281 Percent Total Households 100% 31% 100% 100% 12% 100% Family Households 65% 29% 64% 70% 14% 71% Married Couple 22% 21% 20% 49% 8% 48% With children 13% -21% 8% 24% 7% 23% No children 9% 80% 13% 26% 10% 25% Male Householder 7% 19% 6% 5% 24% 6% With children 4% 0% 3% 2% -2% 2% No children 3% 47% 3% 3% 49% 3% Female householder 36% 35% 37% 15% 29% 17% With children 29% -8% 20% 9% 8% 9% No children 7% 203% 17% 6% 64% 8% - Non - family Households 35% 36% 36% 30% 8% 29% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000, Summary File 1, Miami -Dade County Department of Planning and Zoning, Research Section, 2003. Housing Number of Units The 754 housing units reported in 2000 was an increase over the 596 reported in 1990, reversing a decline in the previous decade. Tenure and Vacancy The vacancy rate in South Miami in 2000 was much lower than the comparable County figure of 9 percent. Renter - occupied units accounted for 61 percent of all occupied units, down from the 69 percent reported in 1990, but continued to be higher than the County's 42 percent. Table 4 Housing Units by Tenure and Vacancy Status South Miami and Miami -Dade County 1990 to 2000 South Miami Miami -Dade Change 90 Change 1990 to 00 2000 1990 90 to 00 2000 Total Units 596 158 754 771,288 80,990 852,278 Occupied Units 544 170 714 692,355 84,419 776,774 Owner Occupied 170 111 281 375,912 73,413 449,325 Renter Occupied 374 59 433 316,443 11,006 327,449 Vacant Units 70 -30 40 78,933 - 3,429 75,504 For Rent 35 -22 13 31,611 - 11,745 19,866 For Sale 2 -1 1 11,007 -1,152 9,855 Seasonal/Other 15 -10 5 32,736 -3,090 29,646 Vacant/Boarded Up/ Other Vacant 18 3 21 3,579 12,558 16,137 Percent Total Units 100% 27% 100% 100% 100 % 1000/0 Occupied Units 91% 31% 95 % 90 % 104% 91% Owner Occupied 29 % 65% 37 % 49% 91% 53% Renter Occupied 63% 16%% 57% 41% 14% 38% Vacant Units 12% -43% 5 % 100/0 4% 9% For Rent 6% -63% 2 % 4% -15% 2% For Sale 0% -50% 0% 1% -1% 1 % Seasonal/Other 3% -67% 1% 4% 4% 3% Vacant/Boarded Up/ Other Vacant 3% 17 % 3% _00/0 351% 2% Vacancy Rate 12% -19% 5% 100/0 4% 9% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000, Summary File 3, Miami Dade County Department of Planning and Zoning, Research Section, 2003. 7 Housing Values and Rents All of the owner-occupied homes in South Miami were valued at less than $100,000 in 2000. The comparable P arable Coun tY figure was 34 percent. Table 5 Value of Specified Owner - Occupied Housing South Miami and Miami -Dade County 1990 to 2000 1990 2000 South Miami Miami- Dade South Miami Miami- Dade Total Units 138 275,298 83 335,815 less than $30,000 18 4,095 0 2,097 $30,000 to $59,999 60 44,179 32 13,900 $60,000 to $99,999 54 129,221 51 98,294 $100,000 to $149,999 4 52,723 0 109,962 $150,000 to $199,999 2 18,764 0 53,514 $200,000+ 0 25,746 0 58,048 Percent Total Units 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% less than $30,000 13.0% 1.5% 0.0% 0.6% $30,000 to $59,999 43.5% 16.0% 38.6% 4.1% $60,000 to $99,999 39.1% 46.9% 61.4% 29.3% $100,000 to $149,999 2.9% 19.2% 0.0% 32.7% $150,000 to $199,999 1.4% 6.8% 0.0% 15.9% $200,000+ 0.0% 9.4% 0.0% 17.3% Source: U. S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population and Housing, Summary Tape File 1, Florida, 1990. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000, Summary File 3, Miami -Dade County Department of Planning and Zoning, Research Section, 2003. 8 About 76 percent of rental units rented for less than $500. The comparable County figure was 38 percent: Table 6 Contract Rent for Renter - Occupied Units South Miami and Miami -Dade County 1990 to 2000 1990 2000 South Miami Miami -Dade South Miami Miami -Dade Total Units 361 305,935 325 326,833 less than $100 54 15,527 50 18,675 $100 to $199 95 16,181 88 16,614 $200 to $249 46 14,021 39 5,360 $250 to $299 41 21,364 14 6,510 $300 to $349 49 30,280 20 10,741 $350 to $399 34 39,390 21 16,473 $400 to $449 21 36,104 - 22,095 $450 to $499 17 34,036 15 29,180 $500 to $599 4 48,431 40 58,061 $600 to $699 0 25,047 12 53,707 $700+ 0 25,554 26 89,417 Percent Total Units 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% less than $100 15.0% 5.1% 15.4% 5.7% $100 to $199 26.3 %° 5.3% 27.1% 5.1% $200 to $249 12.7% 4.6% 12.0% 1.6% $250 to $299 11.4% 7.0% 4.3% 2.0% $300 to $349 13.6% 9.9% 6.2% 3.3% $350 to $399 9.4% 12.9% 6.5% 5.0% $400 to $499 5.8% 11.8% 0.0% 6.9% $450 to $499 4.7% 11.1% 4.6% 8.9% $500 to $599 1.1% 15.8% 12.3% 17.8 6/. ' $600 to $699 0.0% 8.2% 3.7% 16.4% $700+ 0.0% 8.4% 8.0% 27.4% Source: U. S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population and Housing, Summary Tape File 1A, Florida, 1990. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000, Summary File 3, Miami Dade County Department of Planning and Zoning, Research Section, 2003. 9 Income Incomes in South Miami were lower than the County average. About '80 percent of all households with income had incomes below $35,000, compared to 48 percent in Miami -Dade County. Table 7 Income Distribution Households with Income South Miami and Miami -Dade County 1999 South Miami Miami -Dade Total Black Hispanic Total Black Hispanic Less than $10,000 178 92 93 107,901 27,389 62,527 $10,000 to $14,999 61 46 15 58,409 12,035 35,437 $15,000 to $24,999 119 112 7 111,649 22,886 67,667 $25,000 to $34,999 56 40 16 100,833 19,273 59,907 $35,000 to $49,999 85 52 14 121,780 21,239 69,946 $50,000 and over 16 10 0 276,806 35,232 141,943 Total Households 515 352 145 777,378 138,054 437,427 Percent Less than $10,000 35% 26% 64% 14% 20% 14% $10,000 to $14,999 12% 13% 10% 0 8% 0 9 /0 0 8 /o $15,000 to $24,999 23% 32% 5% 14% 17% 15% $25,000 to $34,999 11% 11% 11% 13% 14% 14% $35,000 to $49,999 17% 15% 10% 16% 15% 16% $50,000 and over 3% 3% 0% 36% 26% 32% Total Households 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000, Sununary File 3, Miami -Dade County Department of Planning and Zoning, Research Section, 2003. 10 Povertv In 2000, South Miami continued to be a high- poverty area. The poverty rate for persons was 49 percent, considerably higher than the County's 18 percent, and up from the 38 percent recorded in 1990: Children were especially affected by poverty. About 60 percent of all children under 18 were poor, higher than the 44 ' percent reported in 1990. This was considerably worse than the County's high poverty rates for children, 23 percent: Table 8 Number and Percent of Persons in Poverty South Miami and Miami -Dade County 1990 and 2000 South Miami Miami -Dade 1990 2000 1990 2000 Total Persons 768 38% 714 49% 341,261 18% 396,995 18% Black 520 31% 590 40% 117,357 30% 124,801 29% Hispanic 168 78% 122 8% 183,207 20% 223,335 18 %' Elderly 154 58% 107 7% 52,706 20% 55,020 19% Young Under 5 99 46% 110 8% 33,721 25% 32,995 23% Under 18 294 44% 345 24% 111,739 24% 127,435 23% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000, Summary File 3, Miami-Dade County Department of Planning and Zoning, Research Section, 2003. Reflecting personal poverty, household poverty rates also remained quite high. About 43 percent of all family households were below the poverty level, an increase over the 37 percent in 1980. Among female householder households with children, a high 56 percent were in poverty, about the same level as in 1990. Table Percent of Households in Poverty South Miami and Miami -Dade County 1990 and 2000 South Miami Miami -Dade 1990 2000 1990 2000 Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Fainily Households 146 37% 111 43% 68,679 14% 80,108 14% Female headed families, with children & no husband present 111 58% 69 56% 27,076 42% 31,621 37% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000, Summary File 3, Miami -Dade County Department of Planning and Zoning, Research Section, 2003. 11 Employment Labor Force Status In 2000, 16 percent of the civilian labor force in South Miami was unemployed, the same level as in 1990, but much higher than the comparable County figure (9 percent). The rate of labor force participation in the area was much lower than the County average. About 62 percent of area residents over 16 were not in the labor force, i.e., neither employed nor looking for work, compared to Miami - Dade's 43 percent. Table 10 Labor Force Status, Persons 16 Years and Over South Miami and Miami -Dade County 1990 and 2000 South Miami Miami -Dade 1990 2000 199' 2000 an P P Hispanic Hispanic -. Total Total Black Origin Total Total Black Origin Civilian Labor Force 6,674 359 313 30 976,754 1,009,456 184,703 586,601 Employed 5,626 300 260 30 901,828 921,208 159,184 535,989 Unemployed 1,048 59 53 0 74,926 88,248 25,519 50,612 Not in Labor Force 3,609 577 381 175 537,778 747,409 134,834 460,333 Percent Civilian labor Force 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1000/0 Employed 84% 84% 83% 100% 92% 91% 86% 91% Unemployed 16% 16% 17% 0% 8% 9% 14% 90/0 Not in Labor Force 35% 62% 55% 85% 36% 43 % 42% 44% Note: All figures refer to the civilian labor force. Members of the armed forces are excluded. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000, Summary File 3, Miami -Dade County Department of Planning and Zoning, Section 2003. g� , 12 Educational Attainment The educational attainment levels of South Miami residents over 25 years lagged behind the County levels. A high 48 percent had not completed high school compared to the County average, (15 percent). Only 7 percent had completed four or more years of college compared to 21 percent in Miami -Dade. Table ll Educational Attainment Persons Age 25 and Over South Miami and Miami -Dade County 1990 to 2000 1990 2000 South Miami Miami -Dade South Miami Miami -Dade Not High School Graduate 617 448,282 396 229,000 High School Graduate 375 296,444 229 458,458 1 -3 Years College 154 296,109 139 536,040 4 Years of College + 29 240,460 56 323,399 Total 1,175 1,281,295 820 1,546,897 Percent Not High School Graduate 53.7% 35.0% 48.3% 14.8% High School Graduate 26.5% 23.1% 27.9% 29.6 % 1 -3 Years College 15.8% 23.1% 17,0% 34.7% 4 Years of College + 4.0 % 18.8% 6.8 % 20.9% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0 % Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population and Housing, Summary Tape File 3A, Florida, 1990. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000, Summary File 3, Miami-Dade County Department of Planning and Zoning, Research Section, 2003. 13 APPENDIX C CRA PLAN UPDATE - PHASE II APPENDIX C TABLE C.1- 2004 Income Limits Schedule a G � 291 tc R g+ er s 0 15 v it PP o m al D D Q & M utl w 4. C 4 ti em Q V v a, ar 3• Nt r.. u:r =J a C u'i " m �J h ems, ih N ?+l � C•J 7t' L`Y G eV t r'i a i C, v o Es 6 a U^ C: C+ B C, n dD ^" 9 o. 151 C. 0 6 6= 15 kt e'v u c rr na ai) i• eu.. �; ea 3. [vz C p+ - r- aie 3 i r+ _ r ^U tti . F Avi n. ±°F �f �h F- _ { 4V •:4 d°F � c'S *t +1' L'F � J .- r hh t4 nc !Y e"i +t- i2 N • 8 F4 a tr ^ - . a < u 912-9 . 'i7 k-. Act, N 1 11 T I ? IQ F- i a In. i#� 4i GF 4 t r `#^� w • v ,ara tom•! s�W e�rr r�r rJ if Y to +r rk. ^? fq ..�, "w .. N .:`J 4W ^ 'h'J 4 4 .€r � t —, g r i �® A °. ''� 3 a fti iY4 C �!s C• ff �. 6 g . a a Q a a T. � iA '� 5 H 6 ffY g >n o e. , a � � Q � w U �. 9 .� l! f•. {i. L^`. "4 Yr iS+ a°> p7 t5 xi -. � ?^! s:t C fS e4 If'. A.G t�.'f < kp bF rrtr ul Cti, - ... L O Z 6 a,TS:4 @ 4'+ da H of n. C{ k�i 1'ii a� ° S7."f •q za yf G O a Q ' t � 4 S � t. L" fry f +: 4R C! N 4! 4i. °�', ,� '+4 'R� M [6 m h-: qqss a� 4 �• cw et � h= #'i K': 9 2 N ^ Z.." `p +y �i! •iT 4 C7 iu. 2 4 a¢. _H -• ! RE W 41',,' e!M a°4 N +r In N . b is 6 g ua � 4'e 8 1!Y - 9 4:• c ? � +@ � T.? att kl 5 ri• ,e! •P � ey ¢7 � O', -^ @ f 5} rT i1 f � ,MF aye 0 sw b t'J a-., 9 Z 8-- . i 9 �- Y'9 1I7 9 :a r 2 2 Z RE. F a n � a f 1 5o 1 2 � ss S cW N .Q ±n F� P._ 'Ct. rvs it n � . :; T t.7 ,ea — r! ft - G. F; � °g tk •7. t; ,°,a •mi .0 � r- r V ,:;� Sy; te a vi rti u-. � ai e� r- r 92. w 9 C} tya, r X, S. o w © _ � t b '7 Atl Wl i-! N aJ n: 4 r ia} t•'s v.: �' IP � tf k1 �' +1 N •! � r � � � M. iF1' ° eEey�3f qq.. N 3 °' N ±� N +3 H u �" r � r w� r � U a � � t9 � ✓ 2�: t� 5- 44 �� .A" 3•p bR' Yr" zF `.�• o-. ✓`+ f �'t� a? 'r4 L: L° irkw�+ •�' e g ..�• e�•} +a '�R� 4. cfn .l 3u � N ] r�'r ;--.. Jn "-1 ut +� ,.V Y a k� ap r�r � R a � 4. ea u+ 4TW -r 3 -5f % IN F CRA PLAN UPDATE — PHASE II APPENDIX C TABLE C.2 2004 Rent Schedule by Number of Bedrooms in Unit €iredive 1,20/'d004 N,1qreat pas?ed IS90 and Later Fd-F'G Pcstod 1rG4 0y1r�l?o of Brow, Florida Housing Finance Corporation 2004 Maximum Refit% by Nurn etr of Bedrooms in Unit NOTE: TIft sdredule is to be (rsed brdevelcprtws pbr#icip sg in Me f+ailoaiftg prevams, l oustrrg Cred3 (HQ receiving allocations ON ark AFTER. JanuaTy 1, MO. Stale Hausing Initiativvs Par nembip ('sS-i P,), and HUD NOW 0r-3 r-.iilyMsR Sttu ring. €xcfjdirg SHIP, Ihesr: eq-oes repte•ent ItfAMMUM gra3s setts 7f9Gni mavrl M tic Pn aflo anco 1s; g Florida Housing Fnance Corporation riffarch 2003 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -23 -04 DRAFT Percentage Number of Bedrooms in Unit Ott /Mmmfy) Categrry EFF 1 z 3 4 Caine. -Ale USA— M. 273 293 35 40a M 0,10 U0 33% 301 322 3117 447 40D 35% 319 342 411 475 530 40% 365 351 470 543 45% 410 4AD 528 iii [} 681 50% 456 489 587 678 757 547 567 795 814, 91 80% 731 783 940 1,085 1,211 120 5 1.1x35 1,174 1.4.18 1,629: 1.818 Jacksmilte PASA 28% 277 297 3-56 411 459 (C12Y/DUVQY 39% 297 313 382 441 492 1va.ssatwsaintJahns) 35% 346 371 445 514 574 40% 396 424 519 588 657 45% 445 477 572 667 739 50% 495 5,30 636 735 921 00% 594 635 763 882 985 80% 792 949 1.019 1.177 1.312 120/4 1 1,188 1 1273 1,527 .1,765 1,971 LK£dt S!Irr"J3r"'�i�rb PA SA (Polk) 33% 271 299 348 403 449 35% 287 308 374 427 476 40% 329 352 423 489 545 45% 370 396 475 5550 613 54% 411 440 528 611 1181 60% 493 028 634 733 917 83% 657 705 846 977 1,090 1781/1 997 1,057 '1,264 1 rir67 1,636 e ooaerne- r usa� Palyn Bay kiSA 30% 287 303 368 426 476 (8revard) 35% 335 359 430 497 555 40% 383 410 492 569 O'35 45% 430 461 553 640 714 SM 478 513 816 711 7 60% 574 615 738 853 952 C-3', 768 920 495 1;137 1,20a 120,1/o 1,149 1,231 1,475 1,707 _ 11905 rill o (0ade) 33% 304 428 391 452 35% 322 348 414 479 534 40% 369 395 474 548 611 45% 415 444 633 cis 097 50% 461 494 5842 685 763 60% 553 593 711 822 916' an 737 740 948 1,096 1.222 12g -/3 I 1,107 1,1 &B 1,422---.L', 1164 1,OL3 Florida Housing Fnance Corporation riffarch 2003 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 -23 -04 DRAFT