Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
06-06-06
South Miami v AIIWAmerleaCgjr 9 92 InAl �w City Commission' Meeting 1) City of South Miami,, lobbyist Fausto Gomez 2) "Recognizing the sponsors of the National `Public Works' Week" 3) Officer Joe Mendez as Officer of the Month for April 2006 4) HR to present City manager Advisory Committee, final recommendation REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 1 AGENDA - JUNE 6, 2006 ITEMS (S) FOR THE COMMISSION'S CONSIDERATION: 1. Approval of Minutes a) Minutes of May 2, 2006 b) Minutes of May 8, 2006 2. City Manager's Report a) Report on disposition alternatives; for City owned _property located at 5890 SW 69th Street (Inspection Station site) 3. City Attorney's Report PUBLIC REMARKS CONSENT 4. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH :MIAMI, FLORIDA, ;RELATING TO BOARDS AND COMMITTEES; APPOINTING JOSEPHINE B ANDERSON TO SERVE ON THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR A TERM OF TWO YEARS, ENDING JUNE 5, 2008`; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, 3/5 (A RESOLUTION APPOINTING JOSEPHINE B. ANDERSON TO SERVE ON THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR A TERM OF TWO YEARS, ENDING JUNE ' -5, 200`8) (Mayor Feliu) 5. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO BOARDS AND COMMITTEES; APPOINTING CARLOS I. CARDELLE TO SERVE ON THE BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE FOR A TERM ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2006; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.3 /5 (A RESOLUTION APPOINTING CARLOS I. CARDELLE TO SERVE ON THE BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE FOR A TERM ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2006) (Mayor Feliu) 6. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ISSUE A SERVICE WORK ORDER TO TY LIN /H.J. ROSS FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES FOR THE CHURCH STREET IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE III, IN AN AMOUNT OF $21,270.00'TO BE CHARGED TO MIAMI -DADE COUNTY OFFICE OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (OCED) GRANT ACCOUNT NUMBER 106 1724 -541 -3454; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 2 AGENDA - JUNE 6, 2006 (A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ISSUE A SERVICE WORK ORDER TO TY LINIH.J. ROSS FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CONSTRUCTION .SERVICES FOR THE CHURCH ST IMPROVEMENTS IN AN AMOUNT OF $21,270.00 TO BE CHARGED TO MIAMI -DARE COUNTY (OCED) GRANT ACCOUNT W /CURRENT BAL$200,000) (City ,Manager) 7. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH; MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A WORK ORDER: FOR TRUCK CRANE ''REPAIR BY AMERICAN TRUCK CRANE, INC. IN AN AMOUNT OF $6,390.27 TO BE CHARGED TO PUBLIC <WORKS DEPARTMENT'S ACCOUNT NUMBER 001 -1760 -519 -4680; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 (A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A WORK ORDER FOR TRUCK CRANE REPAIR BY AMERICAN TRUCK CRANE, IN AN AMT OF $6,390.27 TO BE CHARGED TO THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT'S ACCT W /CURRENT BAL$24,968.09) (City Manager) 8. A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO DISBURSE AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $30,000.00 TO PROTURF INC. FOR THE RENOVATION OF THE BASEBALL /SOFTBALL FIELDS' AT PALMER PARK TO BE CHARGED TO THE FLORIDA RECREATION DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (FRDAP)' GRANT ACCOUNT NUMBER 001.0000.131.2221 AND THE PARKS GRANT MATCHING FUND ACOUNT NUMBER 001.0000.219.3520; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 (A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO DISBURSE AN AMT NOT TO EXCEED $30,000.00 TO PROTURF, INC. FOR THE RENOVATION OF THE BASEBALL /SOFTBALL FIELDS AT PALMER PARK; TO BE CHARGED TO THE FLA RECREATION DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE 'PROGRAM AND THE PARKS GRANT MATCHING FUND ACCTS W /CURRENT BAL$54,838 & $21,690 RESPECTIVELY) (City Manager) 9. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO DISBURSE AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $8,000.00 TO FLORIDA ELECTRIC CONTRACTING SERVICE, INC. FOR THE REPAIR OF ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHTS AT PALMER PARK TO BE CHARGED TO THE HURRICANE WILMA FEMA ACCOUNT` NUMBERS 001.0000.115.5037 AND 001.0000.115.5035 AND THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT'S MAINTENANCE & REPAIR ACCOUNT NUMBER 061.2000.572.4620; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 (A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO DISBURSE AN -AMT NOT TO EXCEED $8,000.00 TO FLORIDA ELECTRIC CONTRACTING SERVICE,' INC. FOR THE REPAIR OF ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHTS AT PALMER PARK TO BE CHARGED TO THE HURRICANE WILMAIFEMA AND THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT'S MAINTENANCE & REPAIR ACCTS W /CURRENT BAL$4,375;: $625; & $6,049 RESPECTIVELY) (City Manager) REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 3 AGENDA - JUNE 6, 2006 10. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A' CONTRACT -WITH' FIREPOWER DISPLAYS UNLIMITED, INC. FOR THE ANNUAL JULY 4TH FIREWORKS DISPLAY FOR A TOTAL PRICE OF $9,000.00, WITH DISBURSEMENT FROM THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 4 T OF JULY FIREWWORKS ACCOUNT NUMBER 001- 2000 -572- 4820; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE: 3/5 (A RESOLUTION` AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A' CONTRACT WITH FIREPOWER DISPLAYS UNLIMITED FOR THE ANNUAL JULY 4TH FIREWORKS DISPLAY FOR A OF $9,000.00, WITH DISBURSEMENT FROM THE PK & REC DEPT 4- OF JULY FIREWORKS ACCT W /CURRENT BAL$10,000) (City Manager) 11. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO WAIVING REQUIREMENTS OF RESOLUTION :27 -03 -11576 FOR THE 'ROTARY CLUB OF SOUTH MIAMI FOR THE EVENT SPONSORED BY THE ROTARY CLUB, WHICH EVENT SHALL BE NAMED THE SOUTH MIAMI ROTARY ARTS FESTIVAL; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 (A RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE ROTARY CLUB OF SOUTH MIAMI FOR THE EVENT SPONSORED BY THE ROTARY -CLUB, ',WHICH EVENT SHALL BE NAMED THE SOUTH MIAMI ROTARY ARTS FESTIVAL) (Mayor Feliu) ORDINANCE (S) SECOND READING PUBLIC HEARING (S) 12. AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE CITY COMMISSION, AMENDING CHAPTER -2 SECTION 2 -2.1 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, ENTITLED "RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE CITY COMMISSION "; BY CHANGING THE DATE OF REGULAR COMMISSION MEETINGS; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL, CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 (Mayor Feliu) RESOLUTION (S)/PUBLIC HEARING (S) (NONE) RESOLUTION (S) 13. A "RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, DIRECTING THE REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 4 AGENDA - JUNE 6, 2006 ADMINISTRATION TO WORK WITH MIAMI -DADE COUNTY FOR THE DESIGN OF 'A ROUNDABOUT AT THE INTERSECTION OF SW 67TH AVENUE AND SW 64TH STREET; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (Deferred 5102106 & 5116106) 3/5 (A RESOLUTION' DIRECTING THE ADMINISTRATION TO WORK WITH MIAMI -DADE COUNTY FOR THE DESIGN OF A ROUNDABOUT AT THE INTERSECTION OF SW 67' AVE & SW 64' ST) (Commissioner Beckman) 14. A'RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO HIRING A: FINANCIAL 'MANAGEMENT CONSULTING FIRM; AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF AN RFQ FOR PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTING AND OPERATIONAL REVIEW AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 (A RESOLUTION RELATING TO HIRING A FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTING FIRM; AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF AN RFQ FOR PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTING ANDI OPERATIONAL REVIEW AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES) (Vice Mayor Wiscombe) 15. A "RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO LOBBYING THE STATE LEGISLATURE TO CHANGE STATE LAW SO AS TO PRECLUDE CELLULAR TELEPHONE USAGE BY MOTOR VEHICLE DRIVERS WHILE LOCATED IN -A SCHOOL ZONE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (A RESOLUTION RELATING TO LOBBYING THE STATE LEGISLATURE TO CHANGE STATE LAW SO AS TO PRECLUDE CELLULAR TELEPHONE USAGE BY MOTOR VEHICLE DRIVERS WHILE LOCATED" IN A SCHOOL ZONE) 3/5 (Mayor Feliu) 16. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO AN APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS AS PROVIDED FOR UNDER THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT FOR CIRCUIT COURT CASE: MARK RXCHMAN FROPERT,IES V. CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, UNDER CASE NO.: 03-07058-CA-24 (Fla. 11th Cir. Ct. 2003); PROVIDING FOR DESIGNATION OF A'SPECIAL HEARING OFFICER TO HOLD THE PUBLIC HEARING ON BEHALF OF THE CITY COMMISSION, AND "PRESENT IT'S FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE COMMISSION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 (A RESOLUTION 'RELATING TO AN APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS` AS PROVIDED FOR UNDER: THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT FOR CIRCUIT COURT CASE: MARK RIC MAN PROPERTIES V. CITY OF SOUTH ,MIAMI; PROVIDING FOR DESIGNATION OF A SPECIAL HEARING OFFICER TO HOLD THE PUBLIC HEARING ON BEHALF OF THE CITY COMMISSION) (City Manager) 17. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI APPROVING A FY 05/06 SMCRA BUDGET REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 5 AGENDA - JUNE 6, 2006 TRANSFER IN THE AMOUNT OF $382,5,59 FROM 'ACCOUNT 'NUMBERS 610 - 1110 - 551 -99 -31 (MOBLEY BUILDING RENOVATION) 610- 1110 - 551 -99 -33 (BUSINESS START -UP) 610- 1110 - 552 -31 -20 (COMMERCIAL REHAB), 610- 1110 - 553 -99 -30 (RESIDENTIAL REHAB) AND 610- 1110 - 559 -34 -50 (PART -TIME - INTERN) T0- ACCOUNT NUMBER 610- 1110 - 583 -61 -10 (LAND ACQUISITION) FOR THE PURPOSE OF PURCHASING PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 6442 SW 59th PLACE, SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA BEARING FOLIO NO.: 09- 4025 - 010 -0180 AND 6443 SW 60th AVENUE, SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA BEARING FOLIO NO.: 09- 4025 - 010 -0050 AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 (A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FY 05106 SMCRA BUDGET TRANSFER IN THE AMOUNT OF $382,559 FOR THE PURPOSE OF PURCHASING PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 6442 SW 59th PLACE, AND 6443 SW 60" AVENUE) (City Manager) 18. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION- OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI AUTHORIZING THE SMCRA TO SEEK COUNTY APPROVAL FOR AN EXTENSION OF THE LIFE OF THE AGENCY FOR A TOTAL OF FIFTEEN YEARS; IN ADDITION TO ASKING THE COUNTY TO PLEDGE -A MATCHING PORTION OF THEIR' SHARE OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (TIF) REVENUES TO PARTIALLY RETIRE A,$2,000,000 FINANCE BOND REQUIRED TO PURCHASE ALL REMAINING PROPERTIES TO IMPLEMENT THE MADISON SQUARE PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE SMCRA TO PLEDGE A MATCHING - PORTION OF THE CITY'S SHARE OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING REVENUES TO RETIRE THE REMAINING' BALANCE OF THE $2,000,000 FINANCE BOND;` AND PROVIDING' AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5'' (A ;RESOLUTION: AUTHORIZING THE SMCRA TO SEEK, COUNTY APPROVAL FOR AN EXTENSION OF THE LIFE OF THE AGENCY FOR A TOTAL OF 15 YEARS ALSO, ASKING THE COUNTY TO PLEDGE A MATCHING' PORTION OF THEIR SHARE OF TIF REVENUES TO PARTIALLY RETIRE A' $2,000,000. FINANCE BOND REQUIRED TO PURCHASE ALL REMAINING PROPERTIES TO IMPLEMENT THE MADISON SQ PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE SMCRA TO PLEDGE A MATCHING PORTION OF THE CITY'S SHARE OF TIF REVENUES TO RETIRE THE REMAINING BALANCE OF THE $2,000,000 FINANCE BOND) (City' Manager) ORDINANCE (3) FIRST READING PUBLIC HEARING'S) (NONE) ORDINANCE (S) FIRST READING 19. AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO A "REQUEST TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SOUTH- MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT; CODE BY PLACEMENT OF A CS -OV, COMMUNITY SERVICE OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT ON LOTS REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 6 AGENDA - JUNE 6, 2006 7,8,27,28,29 AND 30 BLOCK A OF SUBDIVISION OF BLOCKS 3 & 4 OF THE TOWNSITE OF LARKINS LOCATED AT 5974 SW 66" STREET AND 5977 SW 66" TERRACE OVER THE EXISTING RS -4 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT FOR THESE PROPERTIES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE 3/5 (City Manager) 20 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, REPEALING CITY OF SOUTH' MIAMI ORDINANCE NO. 40 ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE SEGREGATION OF THE WHITE AND COLORED CITIZENS OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 (Commissioner Birts) 21. AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA RELATING TO ETHICS, AMENDING CHAPTER 8A OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, ENTITLED "CODE OF ETHICS" PROVIDING FOR THE DEFENSE OF ELECTED OFFICIALS; DEFINITIONS; PROVISIONS FOR DEFENSE OF ELECTED OFFICIALS; REQUEST`` PROCESS AND APPROVAL OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION; RESERVATION OF RIGHTS AND IMMUNITIES; APPLICABILITY; PROVISIONS WHEN COMPLAINT OR ALLEGATIONS ARE. FOUND TO BE MALICIOUS, FRIVOLOUS OR GROUNDLESS; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL, SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 (Mayor Feliu) THE CITY HAS A SIGNIFICANT GOVERNMENTAL INTEREST IN CORDUCTING EFFICIENT AND ORDERLY COMMISSION MEETINGS. SPEAKERS PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT SECTION 2 -2.I (K) (2) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES PROVIDES THAT "ANY PERSON MAKING PERSONAL IMPERTINENT, OR SLANDEROUS REMARKS OR WHO SHALL BECOME BOISTEROUS WHILE ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION SHALL BE FORTHWITH BARRED FROM FURTHER AUDIENCE BEFORE THE COUNCIL BY THE PRESIDING OFFICER, UNLESS PERMISSION TO 'CONTINUE .'BE GRANTED BY A MAJORITY VOTE OF THE COMMISSION. COMMISSION REMARKS REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 7 AGENDA - JUNE 6, 2006 PURSUANT TO FLA STATUTES 286.0105, "THE CITY HEREBY ADVISES THE PUBLIC THAT IF A PERSON DECIDES TO 'APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THIS BOARD, AGENCY: OR COMMISSION: WITH `_RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT ITS MEETING OR HEARING, HE OR SHE WILL NEED A, RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, AND THAT FOR SUCH PURPOSE, AFFECTED PERSON MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. THIS NOTICE DOES NOT ?CONSTITUTE CONSENT BY THE CITY FOR THE INTRODUCTION OR ADMISSION OR OTHERWISE INADMISSIBLE OR IRRELEVANT EVIDENCE, NOR DOES IT AUTHORIZE CHALLENGES, OR APPEALS NOT OTHERWISE ALLOWED BY LAW. REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 8 AGENDA - JUNE 6, 2006 1 City of South Miami 2 Regular City Commission Minutes 3 May 2, 2006 4 s CALL TO ORDER: 6 7 The City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida met 8 in regular session on Tuesday,; May 2, 2006, beginning at 7:12 9 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, 6130 Sunset Drive. 10 11 A. Roll Call: 12 The following members of the City Commission were present: 13 Mayor Horace G. Feliu, Vice Mayor Randy G. Wiscombe and 14 Commissioners Velma Palmer, Marie Birts and Jay Beckman. 15 16 Also in attendance were: -City Attorney Eve Boutsis, City 17 Clerk Maria M. Menendez and Acting City Manager Yvonne Soler- 18 McKinley. 19 20 B. Invocation: The invocation was delivered by Mayor Feliu. 21 22 C. Pledge of Allegiance: 23 The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in ,unison. 24 25 D Presentations (s 26 27_` 1)', The Rotary Club of South Miami presenting a check for 28 $5,000 for the Murray Park lighting. 29' 30 Ms. Ellen' Book presented - a check to the Commission for 31` $5,000 for the Murray Park lighting project.' 32 33 2) Proclamation presented to Ellen Book, President of the 34 Rotary, Club of South Miami for her leadership and contribution 35 to the community.` 36 37 Mayor Feliu, together with Vice- Mayor Randy G. Wiscombe and 38 Commissioners Velma'Palmer, Marie Birts and Jay Beckman presented 39 a proclamation to Ms Book. She said that within the next few 40 weeks, the Rotary Club will be presenting to the Community Center 41' a large, bronze plaque commemorating the Rotary Centennial and 42 the naming of the field. She also thanked the City for its 43 leadership, for the opportunity to serve the community and for 44 recognizing the Rotary's one- hundred years of service. Ms. Book 45 then introduced president elect for next year, Linda 'Kaplan. REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 1 MINUTES - May 2. 2006 - `�"a^.�. —�:. .- ".' =?ir ��°:�""rc. ,.Z'!'" .. .r�'g ^F�;`P'"a..n. •»" �..� a' e'n`Fk�, _„ .€�.�2 T :.m'S- '93"31 �t`l�. TV.t' y'R;} 3a"^a�s'' .�,n 3F^ �:. . , T :: 1 2 With no further comments or discussion, the presentation 3 ended. 4 5 6 ITEMS (S) FOR THE COMMISSION'S CONSIDERATION: 7 8 9 1. Approval of Minutes: 10 (NONE) 11 12 2. City Manager's Report: 13 14 Commissioner Beckman requested from the Finance Department 15 to start including a summary page with the monthly budget report, 16 including staff's opinion as to whether or not we are on track. 17 He also would like for the City to renew the NLC subscription. 18 About the Code Enforcement report on Linear 'Park located on the 19 west side of the Hospital, he requested , a report on what action 20 is being taken to fix that park. 21' 22 Mayor Feliu said that he has been approached by some people 23 to have the Commission meetings on a webpage format. 24 25 Ms. McKinley said that staff is working on a new'webpage and 26 that would be a feature that will be included. 27 28 Mayor'Feliu also said that he would like to begin our Budget 29 Committee and urged the Commission; to provide one person that 30 they would like to see on that Committee so that by the next 31 meeting the Committee maybe formed. He then referred to the 32 Mobley building which he said to be in real bad shape; it is an 33 asset to the City that is not being utilized to its fullest 34 potential;, same thing with regard to the inspection station. He 35 said that something needs to be done with those two properties. 36 37 Ms. McKinley said that staff is studying the Mobley building 38 and looking for refurbishing alternatives for the benefit of the 39 City. As soon as they finish putting together all the 40 alternatives, she will be bringing them to the Commission. 41 42 Commissioner Palmer referred to the resolution she sponsored 43 sometime ago establishing the Point of Distribution (POD) and 44 which 'has been approved _ -by the County; therefore, in the event of 45 an emergency such as a. hurricane, she urged to keep in mind that 46 they might' need to use the Mobley building temporarily for 47 storing supplies as they start coming in. 48 REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 2 MINUTES - May 2 2006 . ..... -;R ^.. -^-r�-'.�.�, 4 ��. ', ,' ,'a's? y a;c, ,-sue .�'',� ;. a- *'.rm..a.�nsf.�.; R - ,�wff rzz' ', S?"' ?.' ar- l Commissioner Birts said that there is no reason why we 2 cannot have the Mobley building, as well as the inspection 3 station cleaned up, and install some landscaping as well. 4 5 Mayor Feliu asked the Manager whether they could have the 6 proposals regarding the Mobley building for the next Commission 7 meeting. 8 9 Commissioner Birts said that the new Moslem Center that just 10 opened is in need of a trash bin. 11 12 Mayor Feliu said that a lot of people have spoken to him 13 about moving the Commission meetings from Tuesdays to Thursdays.` 14 He said that `many people have Bible study on Mondays' and 15 Tuesdays. 16 17 Mr. McCants explained that the CRA meetings,, made' that switch 18 sometime ago for the same reason, moving the meetings to 19 Thursdays but 'because of the lack of community participation it 20 was switched back by the Board. However, they now feel that 21 Thursday would be a better night for them to attend the meetings. 22, 23 Commissioner Palmer said that everybody attending a church 24 have different `church nights; therefore, we cannot structure the 25 City Commission to 'accommodate everybody. She said that she has 26 given up a lot of church nights to be here, and somebody will 27 need to give up something. Changing the day is not a good idea, 28 she added. 29 30 Mayor Feliu said that what they need to do is to get a 31 consensus and see how the majority feels." 32 33 3 -4 a) Open purchase order expenditures in excess of $5,000.00. 35 36 There were no questions or comments on this item. 37 38 b) Scheduling a final workshop relating to the Employee 39 Manual, 40 41 There was no scheduling accomplished at this meeting. 42 43 With no further comments or discussion, the City Manager's 44 Report concluded. 45 46 47 3 City Attorney's Report: 48 49 Ms. Boutsis referred to item no. 16 on the agenda relating 50 to the CRA loan. She said that she believed that the conflict REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 3 MINUTES - May 2,;,2006 h -1 with the Charter has been resolved and'she -asked for a''special 2 meeting possibly to hold it on the next Monday immediately 3 following the CRA meeting, to deal specifically with this issue. 4 5 Moved by 'Mayor Feliu, seconded by Commissioner Birts, the 6 motion to hold a Special City Commission meeting on Monday, May 7 8, 2006, immediately following the CRA meeting passed by a'5 -0 8 vote: 9 10 Commissioner', Palmer: Yea 11 Commissioner Birts: Yea 12 Commissioner Beckman: Yea 13 Vice Mayor Wiscombe Yea 14 Mayor Feliu: Yea' 15 16 Ms. Boutsis then explained that the item would not be heard 17 tonight. Public hearing for second reading will be on Monday. 18 19 Ms. Boutsis also asked to schedule an attorney - client 20 session on a new matter, regarding the Estate of Shields Bowden. 21 There is over '$200,`000 in liens on this property. The attorney 22 client session was scheduled also for Monday the '8th at 7:00 p.m.` 23 24 Commissioner Beckman requested information on the City' -s 25'; financing agreements, such as, the municipal parking garage, the 26 Van Smith Park, the Community Center and the YMCA. 27 28 With no further comments or discussion,, the City Attorney's 29 Report concluded. 30 31 32 PUBLIC REMARKS 33 34 David Tucker Sr. talked regarding item no. 11 on the agenda. 35 36 Simon Diaz said that he needs an inspector to come to his 37 property so that his electricity can be restored. 38 39 Bob Welsh commented that Sunset Drive, between SW 62nd` and 40 SW 67th Avenues is always on the dark. 41 42 Dick Ward referred' to the forensic 'audit asking as to when 43 it will be brought to the Commission, 44 45 Michael Miller urged the City Commission to support the CRA 4.6 loan at next Monday's special meeting. 47 48 Fred Truby said that the Sunset Professional building 49' continues to disturb the neighborhood with its noisy air REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 4 MINUTES - May 2, 2006 1 conditioning system. Ms` McKinley said that staff is waiting for 2 an assessment by an air conditioning company: 3 4 Vice Mayor Wiscombe asked the City Manager to give the 5 building owner a deadline to correct the problem and start giving 6 fines if he fails to comply. 7 8 Rev. Gaye questioned the re- appointments to the Affordable 9 Housing Committee, asking for clarification on the composition of 10 that Committee and how the members are chosen. Mayor Feliu 11 responded that the Committee is composed of five members and 12 there is still one vacancy. He then thanked the Mayor for the 13 suggestion to move the meetings from Tuesdays to Thursdays so 14 that church goers may be able to attend the Commission meetings. 15 16 Craig Sherar commended Commissioner Palmer for speaking 17 earlier against the suggestion to move the Commission meetings to 18 Thursdays. 19`. 20 Simon Codrington said that CRA monies are generated from the 21 very district that it serves. He then said that he has been 22 appointed as a spokesperson for the community and referred to 23 Ordinance no. 40 adopted on January 17, ;1928, providing for "the 24 segregation of the white and colored citizens of the City of 25 South 'Miami." He also referred to a newspaper article published 26 on August 9, 1947 on a related subject. He then urged the 27 Commission to move the meetings to Thursdays. 28 29 Commissioner Birts referred to Ordinance no. 40, saying that 30 even though it is not legal today, that she would like to see 31 whether it is still in the City records She then asked the City 32 Attorney to prepare an ordinance rescinding 'ordinance ' no. 40 33 34 Commissioner Palmer said that we are talking about the year 35 1928; she said that she would like for someone to show her one 36- city in the United ,States of America which was not subjected to 37 the same situation back then; I don't know where we are going 38 with this, because every single one of our cities were under 39 segregation then; we are not unique when it comes to this 40 subject. 41 42 Toni Seller addressed the Commission in support of the 43 resolution on the agenda relating to the installation of the 44 roundabout at the intersection of SW 64th Street and SW 67th 45 Avenue. He said that he heard the presentation by the County and 46 that he was very pleased with it; he thinks that the roundabout 47 will add safety and convenience for people traveling through that 48- intersection, as well as those living in the area. She gave out 49 her phone 'number for any Commissioner that would like to .contact 50 her and set up a meeting': 305 -610- 6462. 51 REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 5 MINUTES -'May 2, 2006 1 Worrel Troup, owner of Princeton Pre - School, spoke in 2 support of' the 'CRA. . He said that about four years ago he received 3 a grant for $25,000 that allowed his school to grow. He said that 4 the CRA is very much needed 'in the community and urged the 5- Commission to support it.' 6 7 Shawnte Wells said that affordable business space is very 8 much needed; she is a small business owner and cannot do anything 9 in South Miami ,because there is no place for her. Something like 10 the Madison Square project is needed for someone like her. She 11 also said that there is no affordable housing in South Miami 12 either. On another' subject, she had some complaints about the 13 After School Program; she said that she would like to see a 14 mentoring program to keep the young ladies that are on the street 15 occupied. 16 17 Mayor Feli:u said that we do advertise the CRA meetings and 18 affordable housing is one of the biggest topics that they 19 discuss. He then invited Ms. Wells to join either the CRA or the 20 Affordable Housing Advisory Boards and that they both have 21 openings. 22 23 Sharon McCain' said that contrary to Michael Miller's 24 opinion, there have been a lot of improvements within the last 25 three years in the CRA; she said that she knows that 'Valencia is 26' selling parking' spaces; she wants to know where the money is for 27 the Farmers Market and that she would like for someone to email 28 her letting her know; she said that she was very pleased to see 29' Sheila back at the reception, desk. 30 31 With no further speakers the public remarks- session was 32 closed. 33 34 Commissioner Palmer said that it is ` well known - that she has 35 always supported the CRA. However, she said that she would be 36 doing the community a disservice if she "would vote 'based' on how 37' everybody else voted. She said that she takes the business of the 38 City very seriously and even during her lunch time she reviews 39 agenda items to make .sure that she comes prepared to the 40 meetings. 41 42 At this time the Mayor stopped for a 3- minute break. 43 44 As the meeting reconvened, the following items were pulled 45' from the Consent agenda: Commissioner Palmer pulled item no. 9; 46 and, Commissioner Beckman pulled items no. 13 & 15 (now nos. 13, 47 14, & 15 respectively) 48 49 50 REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 6 MINUTES - May 2, 2006 1 CONSENT 2 3 50 -06 -12191 4 4. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE 5 CITY OF SOUTH 'MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO BOARDS AND 6 COMMITTEES; RE- APPOINTING RALPH'ROSADO TO SERVE ON THE 7 AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR A TERM OF TWO 8 YEARS, ENDING MAY 1, 2008; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE 9 DATE. 3/5 14 (Mayor Feliu) 11 12 51 -06 -12192 13 5. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE 14 CITY OF SOUTH 'MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO BOARDS AND 15 COMMITTEES;: RE- APPOINTING YVONNE'BECKMAN TO SERVE ON THE 16 AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY' COMMITTEE FOR A` TERM OF TWO 17 YEARS,` ENDING MAY 1, 2008; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE 18 DATE. 3/5 19 (Mayor Feliu) 20 21 22 - 52 -06 -12193 23 6. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR !AND' 'CITY COMMISSION OF THE 24 CITY OF SOUTH 'MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO BOARDS AND 25 COMMITTEES; RE- APPOINTING CAROL BELLAK - ESCOFFERY TO 26 SERVE ON THE AFFORDABLE 'HOUS'ING ADVISORY`COMMITTEE FOR A 27 TERM OF TWO YEARS, ENDING MAY 1 2008; AND PROVIDING AN 28 EFFECTIVE DATE.` 3/5 29 30 (Mayor Feliu) 31 32 53 -06 -12194 33 7. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND' CITY COMMISSION OF THE 34 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA,: RELATING TO BOARDS AND 35 COMMITTEES; RE- APPOINTING DOROLYN DEAN TO SERVE ON THE 36 AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR A TERM'OF,TWO 37 YEARS, ENDING MAY 1, 2008; AND'PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE 38 DATE. 3/5 39 (Mayor Feliu) 40 41 54 -06 -12195 42 8. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE 43 CITY OF SOUTH 'MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO 'BOARDS AND 44 COMMITTEES; RE- APPOINTING NANCY DISOTUAR'TO SERVE ON THE 45 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (,CRA) ADVISORY BOARD FOR' 46 A TWO YEAR TERM ENDING MAY 1, `2008; AND PROVIDING AN 47 EFFECTIVE DATE.` 3/5 48 (Mayor Feliu) REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MINUTES - May 2, 2006 1 2 55- 06- 1219`6 3 9. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE 4 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO BOARDS AND 5 COMMITTEES; APPOINTING 'CURPHY W. GRANT TO SERVE ON THE 6 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CRA). ADVISORY BOARD FOR 7 A TWO YEAR TERM ENDING MAY 11 2008; AND PROVIDING AN 8 EFFECTIVE DATE 3/5 9 (Mayor Feliu) 10; 11 56 -06 -12197 12 10. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE 13 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, SUPPORTING THE FLORIDA' 14 DEPARTMENT OF ELDER AFFAIRS' COMMUNITIES FOR A LIFETIME 15 INITIATIVE PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 16 (Mayor 'Feliu) 17 18 57 -06 -12198 19 11. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE 20 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO ATTORNEYS' 21 FEES; APPROVING ATTORNEYS' FEES' FOR AKERMAN SENTERFITT 22 IN THE AMOUNT OF $12,702.00;" TO BE CHARGED' TO .ACCOUNT 23 NO. 001.2100.519.3440 CONSULTANT LABOR ATTORNEY; 24 PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.' 3/5 25 (City Manager) 2611, 27 58 -06 -12199 28 12. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE 29 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA AUTHORIZING THE CITY 30 MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH TJ PAVEMENT CORP. 31 FOR SNAPPER CREEK ROADWAY & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. 32 PHASE III -A CONSTRUCTION IN AN AMOUNT OF $138,245.00 TO 33; BE CHARGED TO SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 34 GRANT ACCOUNT NUMBER 106- 1712 - 536 -6437; PROVIDING FOR AN 35 EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 36 (City Manager) 37 38 Moved by Vice Mayor Wiscombe, seconded by _Commissioner 39 Palmer, the motion to approve the consent agenda passed by a 5 -0 40 vote 41 42 Commissioner Palmer: Yea 43 Commissioner Birts: Yea 44 Commissioner Beckman: Yea 45 Vice Mayor Wiscombe: Yea 46 Mayor Feliu Yea 47 48 REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 8 MINUTES - May 2,, 2006 r RESOLUTION (S) 2 3 13. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE 4 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO BOARDS AND 5 COMMITTEES; RE'- APPOINTING LEE PERRY TO SERVE ON THE 6 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CRA) ADVISORY BOARD FOR 7 A TWO YEAR TERM ENDING MAY 1, 2008; AND _PROVIDING AN 8 EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 9 (Mayor Feliu) 10 11 Moved by 'Commission Palmer, seconded by Vice Mayor Wiscombe 12 to approve this item. 13 14 Commissioner Palmer explained that the reason for pulling 15 this item is that she knows Mr. Perry well; he has served the 16- City in a very honorable position, but presently he is not well 17 and she thinks that it will be an injustice to put him on a 18 Committee when he is really not well, while there are a lot of 19 people who are well enough to serve. 20 21 Mayor Feliu said that he,would like to verify that Mr. Perry 22 is physically unable of 'attending the meetings; however, it would 23 make a difference if he is willing to serve: 24 25 Moved by Vice 'Mayor Wiscombe, seconded by Mayor Feliu, the 26 motion to defer this item passed by a 4 -0 voter 27 28 Commissioner Palmer: Yea 29 Commissioner Birts: Absent 30 Commissioner Beckman: Yea 31 Vice Mayor Wiscombe: Yea 32 Mayor Feliu: Yea 33 34 35 59 -06 -12200 36 14. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION`, OF THE 3`7 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY 38 MANAGER TO EXECUTE STREET SWEEPING WORK ORDER' WITH SOUTH 39 FLORIDA: MAINTENANCE' SERVICES, INC. IN AN AMOUNT OF 40 $46,,150 TO BE CHARGED TO STORMWATER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT 41 NUMBER 111- 1730 -541 -3450; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE 42 DATE. 3/5 43 (City Manager) 44 45 Moved by Mayor Feliu, seconded by Vice Mayor Wiscombe to 46 approve this item. 47 48 Commissioner Beckman, who pulled this item, asked for 49 clarification as to the location where` the sweeping is being REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 9 MINUTES - May 2, 2006 1 done 2 3 Mr. Balogun explained that the highlighted streets on the 4 map are the streets to be swept. He said that the locations are 5 being evaluated all the time in 'order to establish priority. 6 7 Vice Mayor Wiscombe asked as to what happened to the street 8 sweeper that we have and why are we sub- contracting this out. 9 10' Mr. Balogun explained that about three years ago we went to 11 buy a new sweeper because 'ours is basically obsolete; however, 12 that purchase was postponed because it is more economical for us 13 to contract out, rather than buying a new street sweeper. 14 15 Vice Mayor Wiscombe then said that he found something kind 16 of unusual and asked why would SW 64th Court, from Sunset all the 17 way to Manor Lane be swept. Mr. Balogun said that it is not part 18 of our contract and that this is probably a map error because 19 they normally do not go down that street. 20 21 Mayor Feliu then said to Mr. Balogun that we need to focus 22 on cleaning our downtown. He asked to have the crew concentrate 23 on keeping the downtown area clean; around SW 57th Avenue, SW 73rd 24 Street,' and Sunset Drive; and he said he realizes that Public 25 Works is shorthanded and that he is willing to support that on 26' the budget 27 28 Vice Mayor Wiscombe said that business downtown, 29 particularly restaurants, should have an obligation to send 30 someone out there to clean those bushes from their own debris. He 31 said that business owners need to be put on 'notice that they are 32 responsible for cleaning some of the debris. He also said that 33 the railing was kicked out on the second floor of Starbucks and 34 they are using masking tape for keeping anybody from falling 35 through. 36 37 Mayor Feliu said that it ,might be a Code Enforcement issue 38 but that we need to :make sure whether business owners are 39 required to help pick up after their own debris, and if they do 40 not comply then we need to enforce the rules. 41 42 With no further comments or discussion, the motion to 43 approve this item passed by a 5 -0 vote: 44 45 Commissioner Palmer: Yea 46 Commissioner Birts: Yea 47 Commissioner Beckman: Yea 48 Vice Mayor Wiscombe: Yea 49 Mayor Feliu: Yea 50 51 REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 10 MINUTES - May 2, 2006 .�.a -. rns-:�: �-w ..,.. ,�"�, ^`�'�. , .,r�s -^.e• � �T�, ., ..:. �'r`;.f .+�. ".. a^+. „ n;, rc..' ^-r �'k "_- `," -.�" 'FS`.� ",�.,m..'—'R� „ry ¢� ;,'F.mr,�•- -°sF -r ,^r�*,�'-ta �'.^r 1 60 -06- 12201 2 15 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE 3 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO PROFESSIONAL 4_ SERVICE AGREEMENT; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO PAY 5 THE FIRM OF BLITSTEIN DESIGN ASSOCIATES $20,000 FOR THE 6 COMPLETION OF THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR 7 THE MUNICIPAL PARKING GARAGE CHARGING PAYMENT TO ACCOUNT' 8 NUMBER 001.0000.132.2040; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE 9 DATE. 3/5 10 (City Manager) 11 12 Moved by Mayor Fe -liu, seconded by Vice Mayor Wiscombe to 13 approve this item. 14 15 Commissioner Beckman asked whether these are completed 16 design, documents. 17 18' Mr. McArdle explained that the documents are not totally 19 completed, but the money set aside by the City in the settlement 20 agreement was never intended to pay for the completed documents; 21 the City was responsible for $200,000 and MRP was responsible for 22 any amount above that.: The reason for the $20,000 is that when 23 the City Commission approved this for payment for the Blitstein 24 Design firm in December of last year, the City was under the 25 impression that they had paid $50,000 to the previous architect; 26 when the accounting was done, it revealed that the City had only 27 paid $30,000 In December, the Commission approved $150,0.00 28 thinking that $50,000 had been spent Therefore, when this 29 $20,000 is spent, the City will have paid the $200,000; any 30 additional dollars are clearly, under the settlement agreement, 31 the responsibility of MRP, not the City. 32 33 Commissioner Beckman asked fora copy of the completed 34 documents when they become available: 35 36 With no - further comments or discussion,' the motion to 37 approve this item passed by a 5 - -0 vote: 38 39 Commissioner` Palmer: Yea 40 Commissioner Birts: Yea 41 Commissioner Beckman: Yea 42 Vice Mayor Wiscombe: Yea 43 Mayor Feliu;, Yea 44 45 At this point Mayor Feliu said that this concludes the 46 Consent Agenda items that were pulled, bringing us to the 47 ordinance that I am going to move to defer. Vice Mayor Wiscombe 48 seconded the motion. 49 REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 11 MINUTES May 2,`2006 1 MS. Boutsis reiterated that that there will be a special 2 meeting scheduled for Monday night right 'after the CRA meeting. 3 4 With no further comments or discussion, the motion' to defer 5 the following item until 5 -08 -06 passed by a 5 -0 vote: 6 7 Commissioner Palmer: Yea 8 Commissioner Birts: Yea' 9 Commissioner Beckman: Yea 10, Vice Mayor Wiscombe: Yea 11 Mayor Feliu: Yea 12 13 ORDINANCE (S) SECOND READING PUBLIC HEARING (S) 14 15 16. AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE 16 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY 17 MANAGER TO EXECUTE A FINANCE AGREEMENT WITH SUNTRUST 18 BANK, WHICH THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI SHALL CO -SIGN FOR THE 19 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY'S 20 (SMCRA) ; PROVIDING A 15 -YEAR LOAN FOR $1,465,000 WHICH 21 FUNDING. SHALL FINANCE THE PURCHASE OF FIVE PARCELS WITHIN 22 THE SMCRA MADISON SQUARE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECT;_ 23' PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN 24 CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 4/5 25 (City Manager) 26 27 28 RESOLUTION (S) /PUBLIC HEARING (S) 29 (NONE) 30 31 32 RESOLUTION (S) 33 (CONTM) 34 35 17. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE 36' CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, DIRECTING THE 37 ADMINISTRATION TO WORK WITH MIAMI -DADE COUNTY FOR THE 38 DESIGN OF A ROUNDABOUT AT THE INTERSECTION OF SW 67TH 39 AVENUE AND SW 64TH STREET; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.3 /5 40 (Commissioner Beckman) 41 42 Moved by Mayor Feliu, seconded by Commissioner Palmer to 43 approve this item. 44 REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 12 MINUTES _ May 2, 2006 1 Commissioner Beckman said that there have been a lot of 2 complaints with regard to the above- referenced intersection. As 3' the result of the complaints, the County has conducted traffic 4 studies of the intersections in the surrounding area and has come 5 up < with a few design alternatives on how to improve the 6 intersection. The initial design that the County presented to the 7 City included the expansion of the intersection to three lanes on 8 some portions, and four lanes on other portions, plus the 9 installation of curving. The residents did not like that design 10 at all. The County went back to the drawing board and came back 11, with two new alternatives to the design; one was adding a turn 12 lane with curving, and the other was a roundabout. Out of 'both of 13 those designs the roundabout was the one widely accepted'' by the 14 neighbors and one of the reasons is because it creates slow 15 traffic. He also 'referred to the petition signed by the 16 surrounding neighbors that was included with the item. He 17 reiterated that the conducted surveys revealed that the majority 18 of the neighbors prefer the roundabout. Only, four percent 19 indicated that they prefer the signalized intersection. 20 21 At this point Commissioner Beckman, introduced Jeff Cohen, 22 Assistant Chief with the Miami -Dade Public Works Department 23 Traffic Engineering; Division, for additional comments. Within his 24 presentation Mr. Cohen said that the roundabout is a very 25 proactive feature and that it works because it helps to slow 26 traffic. He then said that they hoped to have the Commission's 27 endorsement so that they could take that to the County Commission 28 to request the funds in order to design and construct the 29 roundabout. 30 31 Mayor Feliu said that he has been in favor, of the 32 roundabouts in many areas and neighborhoods because' he is 33 concerned about traffic calming throughout the City and that this 34 intersection is no exception; however, his concern is that we are 35 looking at it from the perspective of a motorist; he 'asked as to 36 how would the school children cross safely at that intersection 37 when you are going to have cars not stopping anymore 38 39 Mr. Cohen explained that with the roundabout the crosswalk 40 is recessed approximately 20 feet so the driver would have 41 enough distance to react to a pedestrian who steps out into the 42 roadway. 43 44 Mayor Feliu asked whether there is a roundabout presently 45 installed in a similar intersection with a school'; nearby. 46 47 Mr. Cohen said that a number of roundabouts have been 48 installed in the Roads section of the City of Miami, which are 49 being designed according to the new standard. One of them is 50 right at the corner of a school off of SW 12th`Avenue. 5' l REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 13 MINUTES May 2, 2006 3a �,,,�r- ���^!^.:,-.-'��..•_� .:�:: r.,; r-�-� � ;- �,.::,� wm ... 71I kx'�';'"rn., 1 To respond to Commissioner Birts' concern about crossing on 2 the south side and not being seen by a`driver coming from the 3 north,; Mr. Cohen said that the rule at these roundabouts is that 4 the driver has to yield to the pedestrian; these are much more 5 pedestrian friendly. 6 7 Vice Mayor Wiscombe said that he has some real concerns 8 about the traffic flow since this is a main artery; he said that 9 we might be creating a nightmare between 80th Street up to Bird 10 Road. He said that he has seen southbound traffic from 80th 11 Street backed up all the way to this area. 12' 13 Mr. Cohen said that they ran the capacity analysis software 14 for a roundabout and they have determined that this intersection 15 has a level of service B, which is better than 90 percent of this 16 County.; 17' 18 Vice Mayor Wiscombe said that he would have liked to have 19 seen that information attached to this item which would have 20 helped him in making a decision. Mr. Cohen said that they will be 21 able to provide those results to the Commission. The Vice Mayor 22 said that before he votes on this he ''would like to see that 23 software. 24' 25 Commissioner Birts said that she also would like to 26 physically see a similar roundabout. 27 28 Vice Mayor Wiscombe said that he does favor the roundabouts 29 in the residential areas; however, he said that he has a huge 30 difficulty with a main artery such as this one. He then said that 31 there are three things that he is going to look at before making 32 a decision: the roundabouts that Mr. Cohen said that they already 33 exist by the school; the software, to see what type of factors 34 they put into the equation and, he is going to go down to the 35 Roads to take a look at exactly what is there and how it works, 36 so that he could make an educated decision. 37, 38 Commissioner Palmer said that after evaluating all that has 39; been presented she feels that a roundabout at this location might 40 be creating a new problem. She feels that the diameter seems too 41 small for the intersection. Mr. Cohen explained that the larger 42 the circle, the faster that the traffic will go through it which 43 is counter to the purpose: 44 45 Moved by Commissioner Beckman, seconded by Commissioner 46 Birts, with no further comments or discussion', the motion to 47 defer this item passed by a 4 -1 vote: 48 49 Commissioner Palmer Nay.` 50 Commissioner Birts: Yea REGULAR CITY COMMISSION' 14 MINUTES - -May 2, 2006 l Commissioner Beckman: Yea 2 Vice Mayor Wiscombe Yea 3 Mayor Feliu: Yea 4 5 6 61 -06 -12202 _7 18. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE 8 CITY OF SOUTH - MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO BOARDS AND 9 COMMITTEES; APPOINTING BRADLEY CASSEL TO SERVE ON THE 10 PENSION BOARD FOR A TWO YEAR TERM ENDING`APRIL,17, 2008; 11 AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (Deferred 4118106) 3/5 12 13 (Mayor Feliu) 14 15 Moved' by Mayor Feliu, seconded by Commissioner Birts to 16 approve this item. 1' 7 18 Mayor Feliu said that he deferred this resolution in order 19 to give the Vice Mayor an opportunity to review Mr. Cassel',s 20 application regarding his experience in financing. He said that 21 he has asked the City Clerk to revise the board application form 22 so that the applicants may enter more information regarding field 23 experience and expertise. 24 25 Vice Mayor Wiscombe said that he did not get a chance to 26 speak to Mr. Cassel. He said that he really would like to see 27 someone on who has experience on pension boards because we are 28 coming to the point where we are going to have to address a lot 29 of issues when it comes to that field on this particular board 30 and make some hard decisions which will affect us financially. 31 32 Mayor Feliu said that we presently have several sharp 33 individuals on that board, and _this ` gentleman will only add and 34 enhance this board providing a different perspective with regard 35 to investments. 36 37 Commissioner Palmer said that they should be giving Mr. 38 Cassel a chance. We have a pension attorney, and besides, he has 39 financial background. 40 41 Commissioner Birts said that they should urge all those 42 watching the meeting who may have the required expertise to come 43 forward and submit applications. 44 45 Mayor Feliu said that one of the things that he proposed at 46 the last Commission meeting is to use our ''newsletter whis'h is 47 under utilized and advertise vacancies on the different boards. 48 49 With no further comments or discussion, the motion to 50 approve this item passed by a 3 -1 vote: REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 15 - MINUTES May 2, 2006 1 2 Commissioner Palmer: Yea 3 Commissioner Birts: Yea' 4 Commissioner Beckman: Absent 5 Vice Mayor Wiscombe: Nay 6 Mayor Feliu Yea 7 8 9 ORDINANCE (S) FIRST READING PUBLIC HEARING S) 10 (NONE)' 11 12 13 ORDINANCE (S) FIRST READING 14 15 16 19. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 17 AMENDING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH 18 MAAMI, FLORIDA TO REMOVE SECTIONS 20 -4.5 (H)`, (I)., (J) , 19 (K) , (L) , - (M) and '(N) FROM ARTICLE IV, SECTION 20 -4.5 20 ENTITLED LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS IN ORDER TO PROVIDE 21 FOR A NEW SECTION 20 -4.11 TO BE ENTITLED TREE 22 PROTECTION`; CONTAINING INTENT, DEFINITIONS AND 23 APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 24 APPLICATIONS, REQUIREMENTS,' REVIEW, FEES, AND CRITERIA 25 FOR REMOVAL; PROVIDING FOR TREE MITIGATION AND 26 PROTECTION, APPEALS,,' ENFORCEMENT, PENALTIES AND 27', REMEDIES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, ORDINANCES IN 28 CONFLICT, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3/5 29 (Vice 'Mayor Wiscombe) 30 31 Moved by Mayor Feliu,' seconded by Commissioner Birts to 32 approve this item. 33 34 Vice Mayor Wiscombe said that it is very important that we 35 have some guidelines in plane. We have failed to do this in the 36 past, particularly when it comes to development and when it comes 37 to people moving into the City who have no respect with regard to 38 the right of this community to have tree canopy; we all know the 39 importance of the tree canopy in terms of providing shade and 40 also help in conserving energy. We have had developers who have 41 come in and have chopped down' huge oak trees, especially on 42 Miller Road, resulting in a penalty, of just $500. He then said 43 that he would be proposing some amendments to the present 44 ordinance. 45 46 At this time Mr. O'Donniley presented the proposed 47 ordinance. REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 16 MINUTES May 2. 2006 2 Commissioner Palmer said that she has major concerns with 3 this item because in her opinion all of the proposed fees are too 4 excessive. She then referred to ,page 8 paragraph (G). Vice Mayor 5 Wiscombe said that he has added that language in there and will 6 explain why. She said that she understands that we 'need to put 7 some protection in place, but that this is going to encourage 8 people to take' other means'. Among other examples of extremely 9 stringent language, she also referred to page 12, paragraph (M), 10 (6) and (7)'; the $500 appeal fee on page 14; the $5,000 fine for 11 "irreparable or irreversible violations, etc. Finally, she said 12 that she agrees that we must protect the trees, but; at the same 13' time, she feels that we should not put people in `a position that 14 they have to choose between a house and a tree. 15 16, Mayor Feliu said that the intention' of the ordinance is to 17 prevent developers and 'everybody involved in construction from 18, destroying valuable trees, so that they are not notified after 19 the fact when there is no way to remedy the damage being done. 20 21 Vice Mayor Wiscombe said that we do have an obligation to 22 protect the tree canopy in this community.' The problem is that 23 people have been getting away with cutting 'trees for years 24 because $500 for a' tree means 'nothing to a developer. He said 25 that we are doing the people of this community a great disservice 26 by not holding developers accountable. He said that this started 27- with a County ordinance and we tightened it up from there. 28 29 Commissioner Beckman, together with Vice Mayor Wiscombe then 30 proceeded to propose- various amendments: on page 1, Sec. 20 -4.11 31 the title should read "Tree Conservation and Protection for all 32 Zoning District; on page 2, line 5, to amend "with the 33 preservation of existing tree;' canopy to the greatest extent 34 possible; on page 6, line 29, paragraph (D) to include the 35 language relating to Code Enforcement Chapter 162 of State law; 36 on pagei 7, 'line 9, starting with paragraph (E) , through (N) , to 37 add with ",Tree Removal Permit /... on pages 12 and 13, paragraphs 38 (M) and (N) should be switched; on page 13, starting on line 30 39 through the end of the page, to remove sub- paragraph (a), and for 40 sub - paragraph (b) , to remove line 40 starting with ...and the 41 owners... recommending to follow the Planning Board recommendation; 42 on page 14,, lines 7 and 8, Commissioner Beckman recommended to 43 delete the statement dealing with "a fee of $500 ;" (Mr. 44 O'Donniley explained that this fee is recommended because of 45 considerable amount of staff time spent ;' he also explained that 46 appeals are rare; the fee is $50 for each tree with a maximum o,f 47 $500; Commissioner Palmer said that not everyone can afford that 48 type of fee; Ms'. Boutsis recommended some figure below the $27',5 49 Court of Appeals fee; Commissioner Beckman then recommended a 50 $150 fee; on page 9, line 8, (1) Fees (a) , Commissioner Beckman REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 1 MINUTES 7 May 2, 2006 1 recommended that the application fee be $50 per tree and up to 2 $500; 3 4 Mayor Feliu said that he wants to see included in the 5 language of this ordinance that the applicant has read the 6' requirements and penalties and that he /she signs.' 7 8 At 11 :00 p.m. Mayor Feliu moved to extend the meeting for 9 another fifteen minutes. Seconded by Commissioner Palmer, the 10 motion to extend the meeting passed by a 5 -0 vote: 11 12 Commissioner Palmer: Yea 13 Commissioner Birts: Yea 14 Commissioner Beckman: Yea 15 Vice Mayor Wiscombe: Yea 16 Mayor Feliu: Yea 17 18. Continuing with the amendments, Commissioner Beckman 19 referred to page 14 through page 23, recommending the adoption of 20 Attachment "A" as presented by the Planning Department; on page 21 16 line 2`, relating to the $5,000 fine per violation, he said 22 that there should be a more descriptive language to substantiate 23 that fine; Vice Mayor Wiscombe then referred to page 15, line 24, 24 saying that he believes that the Special Master should have the 25' right to deal with the maximum penalty there, up to the $20,000; 26- As far as the recommendation for a more descriptive language 27 relating to the $5,000, staff and counsel concluded that the 28 language as presented is sufficient and would be found proper by 29 a court. 30 31< With no further comments or discussion,, the motion to 32 approve this item as amended passed by a 5 -0 vote: 33 34 Commissioner Palmer: Yea 35 Commissioner Birts: Yea 36 Commissioner Beckman: Yea 37- Vice Mayor Wiscombe: Yea 38 Mayor Feliu: Yea 39 40 41 COMMISSION REMARKS 42 43 Commissioner Birts invited the audience watching the meeting 44 from their homes to come forward and apply to join our Pension 45 Board. 46 47 Commissioner Palmer said that she has a deep concern because 48 she is a Commissioner not for a quarter or for a tenth of the 49 City but for the entire City, and the way she deals with one REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 18 MINUTES - May 2, 2006 1 section she is supposed to deal with the entire City equally. She 2 said that every night she goes over the actions she has taken 3 during the day, and if she considers that she has not been fair 4 with someone, she writes it down and goes back the next 'day and 5 , she fixes it. These are the rules that she lives by, she added. 6 She said that this is the second time that Rev. Gaye has been 7 disrespectful to her because he disagrees with her over a certain 8 issue. She said that as a 'Commissioner she has to evaluate her 9' decisions very carefully because they not only impact one section iG of the City but the entire City. She then urged everybody to work 11' together as one community. 12 13 Commissioner Beckman said that there has been a moratorium 14 on certain parking reductions in the City for quite some time and 15 that he believes that it has expired this past April; he asked 16 the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance in order to renew the 17 moratorium he said that he would ;like to include` a Language 18 regarding moratorium for new construction and also that `parking 19 reductions' given in the TODD bonus schedule be put under 20 moratorium. He then said that he has been talking with a lot of 21 people who are interested in installing a permanent generator but 22 that they are having problems with the setback requirements, and 23 asked the Planning Department to look at it and bring the 24 information back to the Commission for reconsideration. He then 25 referred to the false alarm `fee ' and asked for some data from the 26` Police `Department ' on the amount of calls and paid fees so that it 27' can be evaluated to determine whether the fee schedule should be 28 adjusted;` 29 30 Vice Mayor Wiscombe said that he takes this job very 31 seriously and one of the important things for him is that each 32 and every part of the community is treated fairly and alike. 33 However, sometimes we need to help ,parts of our community that 34 have been 'neglected over the years for whatever reason. He then 35 said that, as Commissioner Palmer stated, he also prays every 36 night so that he makes the right decision for this community, 37 which is not easy.- 38 39 Mayor Feliu thanked the Rotary Club for their generous 40 contribution of $5,000 that will be going towards, the lighting at 41 the Community Center. He also said that we need to understand 42 that families, as well as communities, we all have difference of 43 opinions but that we all need to come together towards the 44 betterment of our community as a whole. 45 46 There being no further business to come before this - Body, 47 the meeting adjourned at 11:15 p.m. 48 49 50 Attest Approved 51 REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 19 MINUTES - May 2,'2006 1 2 3 4 Maria M. Menendez Horace G. Feliu 5 City Clerk Mayor REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 2 Q MINUTES -:May 2,'2006 i ..-.: .;- : ^i,""a"",.,�,!�.,."+;'., - ", ,.., .., _ »,� a..,'?��s- ,*;- ^,.ir-r, �-..:ir.l�'+`�_..: 1 [Draft 2 City of South Miami' 3 Special City Commission Minutes 4 May 8, 2006 5 6 CALL TO ORDER: 7 8 The City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida met 9 in special session on 'Monday, May 8, 2006, beginning at 9:32 10 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, 6130 Sunset Drive. 11 12 A. Roll Call: 13 The following members of the City Commission were present: 14 Mayor Horace G. Feliu, Vice Mayor Randy G. Wiscombe and 15 Commissioners, Marie Birts and Jay Beckman. Commissioner Velma 16 Palmer was absent. 17 18 Also in attendance were City Attorney Eve Boutsis, City 19 Clerk Maria M. Menendez and Acting` City Manager Yvonne Soler - 20 McKinley - <. 21 22 B. Invocation: The invocation was delivered by Rev. Gaye. 23 24 C. Pledge of Allegiance 25 The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison. 26 27 28 ORDINANCE (S) SECOND READING PUBLIC HEARING (S) 29 30 31 1. AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY 32 OF SOUTH MIAMI FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO 33 EXECUTE' A FINANCING BOND AGREEMENT WITH SUNTRUST BANK, 34 WHICH THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI SHALL EXECUTE AND THE CITY 35 OF SOUTH MIAMI' COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (SMCRA) 36 SHALL CO -SIGN ON THE COMMITMENT; PROVIDING A 15 YEAR BOND 37 FOR $1,465,000 WHICH FUNDING SHALL FINANCE THE PURCHASE 38 OF FIVE PROPERTIES WITHIN THE SMCRA'S MADISON SQUARE 39 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE 40 DATE. , 4/5 41 (City Manager)' 42 43 Moved by Mayor Feliu, seconded by Vice Mayor Wiscombe to 44 approve this item. 45 REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 1 MINUTES May 8, 2006 1 Ms. Boutsis explained that there would be a public hearing 2 tonight but that there will also be a motion for a third reading 3 which would take place allowing for a 10 -day 'notice. On the first 4 reading of the ordinance, there was a draft of this ordinance in 5 the agenda package; on the dais that.night at the City Commission 6 meeting there was a revised ordinance that had a` material change 7 which was required under Chapter 218 of the state law; this was 8 not addressed for the records at the Commission meeting; 9 therefore, a third reading of this ordinance is required. 10 11 Ms. Boutsis continued to explained that there was a concern 12 raised prior to the -last meeting as to whether the City 13 Commission would be in violation of the Charter by voting' on a 14 15 -year loan, whereas the Charter limits it to five; years. She 15 said that the letter by Mr. DeCarlo providing his legal opinion 16 clearly states that the City, Commission would not be in violation 17 of the Charter since in this instance,` the borrowing- will be 18 evidenced by a' bond which specifies the repayment terms. (Mr. 19 DeCarlo's letter was attached to the draft ordinance) 20 21 Moved by Vice Mayor Wiscombe, seconded, by Mayor Feliu, the 22 motion to schedule a third reading for Monday, May 22, 2006 at 23 6:30 p.m. passed by 'a 4 -0: 24 25 Commissioner Palmer: Absent 26 Commissioner Birts: Yea 27 Commissioner Beckman: Yea 28 Vice Mayor Wiscombe: Yea 29 -Mayor Feliu: Yea 30 31 Moved by Vice Mayor Wiscombe, seconded by Commissioner 32 Beckman, to amend the Agreement', last paragraph on 'page 3 by 33 adding to the definition of "Non -Ad Valorem' Revenues:" an 34 exemption for any general tax' revenues as defined in F'.`S. 35 166.101; the motion to amend passed by a 4 -0 vote: 36 37 Commissioner Palmer:' Absent 38 Commissioner Birts: Yea 39 Commissioner Beckman: Nay 40 Vice Mayor Wiscombe: Yea 41 Mayor Feliu_ Yea 42 43 Moved, by Commissioner Beckman, seconded by Vice; Mayor 44 Wiscombe, to add Section '3 to the ordinance, the motion passed by 45 a 4 -0 vote 46 47` Commissioner Palmer Absent 48 Commissioner Birts: Yea 49 Commissioner Beckman: Nay 50 Vice Mayor Wiscombe: Yea REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 2 MINUTES -?May 8, 2006 - 1 Mayor Feliu: Yea 2 3 The public hearing was opened at this time. 4 5 Bob Walsh said that residential at Madison Square has 100 6' percent potential for success. Commercial does not. He suggested 7 building 45 townhomes on the site, which would give a land unit 8 cost of $33,000 per unit,, which will allow for affordable 9 housing. If it is made commercial, he urged not to ask the City 10 to -co -sign the bond without getting the CRA to pledge its assets 11 and its income until the bond is paid off. He also suggested 12 including 61st Court by Bird Road into the CRA: 13 14 Cathy McCann said that she is not opposed to the 'Madison 15 Square project, but to the lack of effort that the CRA has put 16 into doing it. She said she is opposed to the City co- signing 17 this loan because the City does not know what the plan is. She 18 reiterated that she is not opposed to the purchasing of the land; 19 however, she is opposed to the $1.5 million loan. In conclusion`, 20 she said that her disagreement is not with the 'CRA and not with 21 the project, but with the fact that the CRA is now saying, we 22 need to increase everybody's mil'lage because we-did not spend our 23 money wisely. 24 25 Mayor Feliu said that the CRA is the City we are one and 26 the same. He then asked Mr. O' Donniley to explain how this loan 27 works because there `seems to be the 'wrong perception on the part 28 of the public.` 29 30 Mr. O'Donniley said that we intend to move this to the 31 Florida League, removing the City's liability; but in addition to 32 that, if for any reason this fails before the County, it is out 33 intention to use all of the TIF funds and the money from the CAA 34- and what remains in this line item to pay out the entire debt, 35 and relieve the City of the obligation. 36 37 Mayor Feliu clarified that it is not paying the loan, but 38 rather,'it is guaranteeing the loan: 39 40 Mr. O' Donni'ley said that in the interim, the CRA has a line 41 item and we will pass that money through to the City's budget, 42 which we have done before, such as with the case of Church Street 43 improvements where 'OCED,,provided' the 50, percent match; we moved 44 our monies into the General Revenue account from CRA to provide 45 that match. This is -a technique that has been used before. 46 47 Yvonne Beckman urged the Commission not to jeopardize fourth 48 fifth of their constituents- to co -sign on this loan. If the CRA 49 has done so well, then they can stand on their own ground. She 50- then recommended putting an`RFP out to see whether there will be 51 other banks that would lend the money directly to the CRA. REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 3 MINUTES -,May 8, 2006 1 2 Sharon 'McCain said that there are no plans for the Madison 3 Square project, and that the project is not financially feasible 4 either.' She feels that what will happen is that once it is 5 approved, they are going to keep coming back asking for a lot of 6' different things. She said that the CRA needs to become 7 responsible. She also said that the CRA has not 'had' a qualified 8 director for the past two years. 9 10 Craig Sherar said that the CRA represents 15 percent of our 11 Ad- valorem taxes; if we did not have the CRA and we saved that 12 money, our taxes would be 15 percent less; that's what the CRA is 13 costing us He said that the CRA should do what they were set out 14 to do with their money. 15 16 Simon Codrington thanked the City Commission and the CRA 17 Board for their support' on these items,, even though this is not 18 popular with many people. He said that grant monies are used by 19 developers all over this County to provide for affordable 20 housing. He said that all of this serves to promote business,; he 21 said that the Valencia did not use any CRA monies and therefore 22 the CRA did not have a -say with that project -. He then urged the 23 Commission to support this item. 24 25 Walter Harris said that he 'fears the Commission's enthusiasm 26 for this project; he urged the Commission to keep in mind that if 27 this project goes through and the City is in line for that money, 28 that there will not be zoning exceptions; that we will not find 29 3 -4 story buildings there, because they will fiercely fight 30 against= it,. 31 32' Adrian Ellis said that the CAA is on board collaborating with 33 the CRA and the City to make sure that this 'project is done; he 34 " also said that they have influence with the County's OCED. He 35 said that people are either- for or against the CRA and for this 36 project. 37 38 With no further speakers the public hearing was closed. 33 40 With no further comments or discussion, the motion to ,approve 41 this item as amended failed by a 3-1 vote: 42 43 Commissioner Palmer: Absent 44 Commissioner'Birts: Yea 45 Commissioner Beckman: Nay 46 Vice Mayor Wiscombe: Yea 47< Mayor Feliu:' Yea' 48 49 50 2 Adjournment REGULAR CITY COMMISSION 4 MINUTES May 8, 2006 l' 2 3 4 COMMISSION REMARKS 5 6 7 There being no further; business to come before this Body, 8 the meeting adjourned at 11:21 pm. 9 10 11 Attest Approved 12 13 14 15 16, Maria M. Menendez Horace G.`Feliu 17 City Clerk Mayon REGULAR CITY COMMISSION Jr MINUTES - May 8, 2006 SDUT� South Miami v Ail-- AmdicaCity CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI INCORPORATES ' 927 �. OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER O RYA 2001 INTER- OFFICE MEMORANDUM To: The Honorable Mayor Feliu and Members of the City Commission Via: Yvonne S. McKinley, Acting City Manager From: Don O'Donniley Date: June 6, 2006 Subject: Disposition alternatives for City —owned property located at 5890 SW 69th Street (Inspection Station site) Request: The City has recently received formal inquiries from local businesses seeking to purchase or lease the City- owned inspection station site at 5890 SW 69th Street. Attached are two recent inquiries received in the City Manager's office. The site is 31,050 sq.. ft. (.7,1 acres) and consists of nine rectangular parcels of which three lots face SW 69"' Street and six lots face SW 70th Street. The property inaccessible from both streets. The site is currently unused and is vacant except for a small building used as part of the old inspection station program. The property is zoned TODD(LI -4), which permits residential,' commercial and light industrial uses. The district encourages mixed uses and has a height limit of two stories. During the past 15 years the property was leased to the State for use as an automobile inspection station and to a company using the site as an automobile towing /storage lot. Alternatives: There are several alternatives which can be used to provide for the development of the site which will result in revenue (rent, property tax) to the City. (1) Sale of the property In 2003 the City obtained formal appraisals of the property. The highest of the two appraisals set market value at $850,000. It can be expected that the current market value would exceed $1 million. The city could strictly control use and design of the development. This process would require an up- dated appraisal and an RFP process. (2) Lease of the property. This process would result in a long term lease similar to the procedure now being used for the development of the municipal parking facility in the Hometown District. The City could receive rent and /or a percent of business activity in addition to property taxes. This process would also require an up -dated appraisal and an RFP process. -(3) Conversion to municipal parking lot. The City could construct a public parking lot in which spaces could be leased to nearby companies in the industrial area. A great number of properties in the area can not be improved or redeveloped because of the inability to provide required parking. Based on industry standards an estimated 65 spaces could be built and used as metered spaces or as leased spaces, 1 Recommendation: It is recommended that as a first step in the re -use process, the Administration be authorized to obtain an updated appraisal of the property. Backup Documentation: Communications from: Nationwide Postal; Grove Tree Service and Landscaping, Inc. DOD /SAWMCGRUMPLANNING \Comm Items \2006 \6 -6 -06 \Revised Inspection Station CM Cover report.doc 2 05/10/2006 WED 11:55 FAX 15162952004 2001/001 NATIONWIDE POSTAL May 10, 2006 In regards to: 5927 SW 70th Street, Miami, FL 33143,.,_,, _.._ Folio number: 09 40250282080 South Miami ECEIVED VIA FACSIMILE & MAIL 305- 663 -6345 MAY ' Q 2006 Maria V. Davis City Manager . - CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE City of South Miami 6130 Sunset Drive S. Miami, FL 33143 -5093 Dear Maria V. Davis: We are the owners of the above referenced property which currently houses the United States Post Office. On January 9th, as per your request, we wrote to you to formalize.our interest in acquiring the adjacent property owned by the City of South Miami. We are still very interested in purchasing this vacant parcel and would like to know the status of our request. The reason behind our intention is to facilitate the continued occupancy of the Postal Service by expanding the facility as well as providing much needed additional customer parking. Thank you in advance for your time and cooperation and we look forward to hearing from you soon. Very trul ours, Andrew Spodek AS: an cc: Don O'Donniley, Planning Director via fax: 305 -666 -4591 123 GROVE AVENUE, SUITE 222, CEDARHURST, NEW YORK 11516 -2302 (516) 295 - 7820 FAX (516) 295 -2004 (800) 470 -3361 Postalmgt @aol.com SENT BY: CITY SOUTH MIAMI; 3056636345; MAY -18 -06 11:36AM; PAGE 1/1 hove Arree d ndscapin `Inc. 7306 S.W. 100 StrP / Miami, 191or da 33158 Phone: (305) 858 -8307 4 Awl 27, 2006 *4? �1-4f, 9 , To Whom; `''May Contcern: e.is Michael Byrne and I am the owner of Grove Tree Service Landscapin' Inc. The resson for this letter is to make a proposal to the City of South Miami to c1' up one of your properties and sign a long-term lease. The subject 'property ,.e yid,. spechon.station and adjoining lots. We; .' pose to'clean up the property,'( remove boat,.'golfcon; dead trees, snd stumps, cut gass, repair fence% and paint building) at no cost to the city and maintain the property as:' as our lease would be in effect. We ve bey ih - business in this area for many years., We certainly do not want to have to live for many reasons.' One of our main reasons is that a good perceo*e of our employ'' '`s are local residents of South Miami. This obviously is an advantage to us,' but also to a Community. We feel that this lease would be tremendously positive for both parfleil We would be able to stay in this area and your property would be cleaned up and rn ' 4ained. You would have a good tenant, and many jobs for your residents. We lope you will consider this proposal soon, as our time to make a decision to move or sty in the area is very limited. Thank you for yourattention to this matter. SinceMy, Michael Byrne '7305 S 100- Strect Miami; FL 331.54 (305)558 -6307 * "'If the Ci " is comido ing selling this property we would be interested in purchasing it. ADDMOML, SELW[CISS 130 ' t Service • hole. Drilling • Stump Qrind[rig * 'hash Hauling JJII 3 � 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF 4 THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO S BOARDS AND COMMITTEES; .APPOINTING JOSEPHINE B. 6 ANDERSON TO SERVE ON THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING 7 ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR A TERM OF TWO YEARS,' ENDING 8 JUNE 5, 2008; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 9 10 WHEREAS, the Mayor and Commission recognize the important 11 contributions made by those who serve on the various city boards and 12 committees, and wish to appoint a full complement to each of the 13 active boards and committees; and 14 15 WHEREAS, the City Commission; desires to appoint Josephine B. 16 Anderson do to serve for a two -year term on the Affordable Housing 17 Advisory Committee. The appointment shall expire June 5, 2008 or until 18 a successor is duly appointed and 'qualified. 19 20 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION 21 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, THAT: 22 23 Section 1. The City Commission hereby appoints Josephine B. 24 Anderson to the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee. 25 26 Section 2. The expiration date of this appointment shall be June 27 5, 2008 or until a successor is duly appointed and qualified. 28 29 Section 3. This resolution shall take effect' immediately upon 30 approval 31 32 PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF JUNE, 2006 33 34 35 ATTEST: APPROVED: 36 37 38 CITY CLERK MAYOR 39 40 COMMISSION VOTE: 41 Mayor Feliu: 42 Vice Mayor Wiscombe: 43 Commissioner Palmer: 44 Commissioner Birts: 45 Commissioner Beckman: 46 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: 47 48 49 CITY ATTORNEY �.t F I o rvrIa a a F a r i d avm� k t Alt- Amfice CRY N- P, i 1 � ,a ECEIVE k MAY "006 2 2001 CITY OF SOUTH---- E 'APPLICATION 6130 Sunset Drive Phone No. 305- 663 -6340 South Miami, FL 33143 Fax No. 305- 663 -6348 1. Name: Jozz "I�# Y" on (Please print) 2. Home Address: d 3. Business Address: 4. Home Phone Na _ Business Phone No. `. Fax No. 5. E -mail Address: wa w: 6. Education/Degree Earned: fl Pertinent Experience: T Field Expertise: 7. Community Service: Pc�.s- C.1Rei► tryYlcxsrl` 1°L 8. Are you a registered voter? Yes No 9. Are you a resident of the City? Yes No 10. Do you have a business in the City? Yes No 11. Ethnic Origin? / White Non - Hispanic African American V Hispanic American Other 12. I am interested in serving on the following board(s) /committee(s): I��c►��►� � ouS�n First choice Second choice Third choice Fourth choice Signature` Date /Applicant MISAPPLICATION WILL REMAIN ON FILE FOR ONE YEAR Revised 4106 I RESOLUTION NO: 2 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY 4 OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO BOARDS AND COMMITTEES 5 APPOINTING CARLOS I. CARDELLE' TO SERVE ON THE BUDGET AND 6 FINANCE COMMITTEE FOR A TERM ENDING SEPTEMBER 30,, 2006; AND 7 PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. g 9 WHEREAS -, the Mayor and Commission recognize the important 10 contributions made by those who serve' on the various city boards and 11 committees, and wish to appoint a full complement to each of the 12 active boards and committees; and 13 14 WHEREAS, the City Commission desires to appoint Carlos I. 15 Cardelle to serve on the Budget and Finance Committee. Appointment 16 shall expire September 30, 2006 or until a successor is duly appointed 17 and qualified. 18 19 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION 20 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, THAT: 21 22 Section 1. The City Commission hereby appoints Carlos I. Cardelle 23 to the Budget and Finance Committee. 24 25 Section 2. The expiration date of this appointment shall be 26 September 30, 2006, or until a successor is duly appointed and 27 qualified. 28 29 Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon 30 approval. 31 32 PASSED' AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF JUNE, 2006. , 33 34 ATTEST: APPROVED: 35 36 37 38 CITY CLERK MAYOR 39 40 COMMISSION VOTE: 41 Mayor Feliu: 42 Vice Mayor Wiscombe: 43 Commissioner Palmer: 44 Commissioner Birts: 45 Commissioner Beckman: 46 47 48 READ AND APPROVED AS ` `TO FORM: 49 50 51 52 CITY ATTORNEY �u # 'oo M souut �nia�n� P t o r 1 d a 2063 C CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI BOARDICOMMITTFE APPUCA77ON C-11 6130 &zrsei Driv a Phone Na 305- 663 -6340 °O �- SoUA Arwn , RL 33143 FarNo. 305 -60 -6348 z 1. Name: Carlos L Cardelle (Please print) L Home Address: 3. BasioessAddress: -- - - - - -. -_._ 4. Home Phone No, Business Phone No. Fax No. _ Email Address°: 6. Bducation Background: Graduated from the University of Miami School of law 1998 Graduated from the University otMiami is i 1995 &A. (Political Science) 7. Community Service- ram a member of Miami -Dade County's Transportation Aestbeties Review Committee ('TARCI which forms Dart of the hfiami -Dade MPO Addifionally I am a member of the Florida Bar's Avistiou Lave Committee and I participateis mentioringprogrsms for minority law school students. Attached is my resnmi; As part of my current: lob as a corporate aftornev we %vrk closely with the corporate lZmanceDiyartmeaL inclading revision or preparation of long ern agreements that require Finance Department; approvals before being executed. S. Are you a regMered voter? Yes :-X- No 9. Are you a residenf of the City? Yes No X 10. Do you have a badaen is the City. Yes NO X 11. Ethnic Origin? White Non-Hispanic, African American_ Hispanic American _X Other 72, i am futerested in serving on the following board(s)fcommiftee(s): Q I Budget ReviewlRinaa,oeCnmma Hometown District Parlang Committee o SSgna(are Date May 18, 2006 cC"14 A i t PP hcan a� � TMS Ai mp&rTON WILL REtATN ON MLE MR ONE YKAR a n��3�sro2 i 1 CARLOS L;CARDELLE, ESQ. n, r• RXPBRIENCE: ` LAN AIRLINES S.A. (formerly Lan Cb e, Airlines S.A.), Miami, Florida r A- woaiate V.S Counsel (August 1999 to present) C> Draft and review complex international business transoctionsrcootraets, including mordbuting (he A kbos Irn uvkie renovation of flail project and assistance in the acquisition and financing of Boeing '767 carg4assenger aicm(L Handle li(tgatton in oommercial litigation matters and in conjunction with outside counsel, including foreign counsel in Chife, Argentina, Colombia, Canada and Pera. Participate bt Ae defense of oompany in arbitration cages. Research FF, arsomlMonlreal Condon case law for commercial claims cases and prepare legal memoranda. AdvLv- Cargo Claims department on legal issues regarding cargo complaints. Prepare and deliver corporate presentations on Sarbanes- Oxley, Foreign Corrupt Practices act and antitrust. Review and revise all; (ransactionslcoutracts pertaining to (be inclusion of'sorline in the oneworld airline alliance. Researrin and handle corporate compliance. with all Federal and stair, regulations and agencies affecting importationlexpartation of cargo and general transportation, including Department of Homeland Security reguladoag (Customs: and Border Protection). Prgmre charter, dry and wet tease agreements for cargo and passenger a rcrafts. PnVar8 and manage U.S. Department of Transportation wA Canadian Transparlation Agency petitions and Fbogs. Draft general commercial agreements pertaining to various corporate matters, including licensing and trademark agreements in Farg1"isb and Spanish- Manage day -fo-day legal issues for all U.S. -based subsidiaries (bat include cargo banc(ling, cargo consolidator' and courier companim Draft Passenger Sales Agreements, Cargo Sales Agreements, Cargo Handling Agreements and Airline Interline Agrwacn& Assist General Counsel in employment, related matters, including assisting in preparation and p=seotaum of sexual harassment training. Review and- revise Sharebolders/Stnek Transfer Agreements per(ainang to all United States corporate subsidiaries. Prepare and file corporatc'amendments, Review all contracts related to U.S. ports (MIA, LAX and !FK). Defend all United States Federal agency complaints, including DHS (CBP cargo and passenger fines). HARD &MAN & SUARRZ, P.A., Miami, Florida 'Aisoc ale (May 1998 to August 1999) Handled commercial litigation cases, including assisting, in trials and preparing and arguing motions in court for State and Federal Multi- District litigation cages Researched case Taw and pr+epued legal memoranda: CLERKING EXPERTENCB: STATE ATTORNEY'S OMM. If "' Judicial C Stmt County Court Division, Miami, Florida CertYW Legair mcrn'(August 1997 to December IWO7 Conducted beneb trials and assisted State Attorneys in jury trials and assisted in preparmg,appellate. briefs. BANDER, FOX- ISICOFF& ASSOCIATES, P.A., Miami, F1oriQa Summo,A4srnrLale (Sommer 1917) Drafted appellate brief and legal memoranda on criminal and business immigration laev, including researching immigration case law. INTERAMRRICAPI FOUNDATION, General Counsel'sOfl!ice, Vlasbington,DC °O Legal ArsysLfffli (Summer 1995) Reviewed and revised all proposed projects for smaln business and development -based gran( ploj ects in Latin 0 America. cr a� ra � ,, BDUCATION: UNVEMITY OF AUAMI SCHOOL OR LAW, Coral Gables, Florida Juris Doctor Degree, cum laude, May f 998 GPA:3.44, Tap IS90 Honors: Dean's List, Dean's Certiricate of Achievement for Outstanding r' Academic Performance, CALL Excdleace,fortheFutureAward, Thomas Rand C-1+ Dorothy B. McDougall Scholarship, Phi Delta Phi IntematiorW Legal FJate;nity, °�° Who's; Who: American Law Students. Aciivi ies: Hispanic Law Students ASSM-WiDU (Chairperson, Speakers Comrneticej, Cri minal Law Society) z Corporate Law Society, Unive ity of Miami School of Irom gnatioR PnojeclWational Lawyer's Gui[d. LNIVERSITYOF MW11, Coral' Gables, Florida Bachefor OrMs in Political Science, cum laude, May 1995 GPA: 3.11 Honors: Henry King Stanford Scboluship, Provost's Honor Roll, Dean's L.isi Gof den Key Honor Society, Phi Kappa Pbi Honor Society, Paides Horror Society. Activities: Director of Political Affairs,ColfegeDemocrats ofAmerica (Waskiogion D.C. and Florida) AMERICAN UNIVERSITY, Washington, DC The Vlashingion Semester Program — 1993 Seminars and independent research on U.S. Politics, Public Policy and faw, Interned at the Human Rights Law Group. ADMITTED Florida BAR ASSOCIATIONS I ACIYVIT : Mcrnber Aviation Law Committee— Florida Bar 2003 to 2406 Munbec, %naportation Aesthetics Review Com' Wee (TARO) of the, MWTd- Da&Metropolitan PlanningOrganizatson (MPO) American Bar Association - Forum on Air and Space Law Cuban- Arnedcaa BarAssacktion Coral Gables Bar Association Dade County Bar Association Cuban- American Bar Association,Mentoring Program Fforfda International University — College ofhm Mentoring Prognun 5`IQ' Languages: Fluent in Spaoish Compatrr: Windows XP aM 9S, WordPerfect, Microsoft Word, Excel, Lezis and Wesdaw cc r� N GS a � 2 sO U Tai South Miami AHMMUMV . INCORPORATED CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI at9 �' OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER INTER- OFFICE MEMORANDUM 2001 To: The Honorable Mayor Feliu and Members of the City Commission Via: Yvonne S. McKinley, Acting City Manager From: W. Ajibola Balogun, REM, CFEA, Director Public Works & Engineering Department Date: June 6, 2006 Agenda Item No.: Subject: Construction Phase Professional Service with TY Lin /HJ Ross for Church Street Improvements — Phase 3 (SW 66th Street to SW 68th Street). Resolution: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR' AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ISSUE A SERVICE WORK ORDER TO TY 'LIN /H.J. ROSS FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES FOR THE CHURCH STREET IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 3`, IN AN AMOUNT OF $21,270.00 TO BE CHARGED TO THE MIAMI -DADE COUNTY OFFICE OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT` (OCED) GRANT ACCOUNT NUMBER` 106- 1724 - 541 -3454; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE Request: Authorizing the City Manager to execute a professional service work order with TY Lin /H.J. Ross for Church Street Improvements — Phase 3. Reason /Need: To provide much needed infrastructure improvements along Church Street corridor, from SW 66th Street to SW 68th Street. TY Lin /H.J. Ross is one of our engineering consultants with current General Engineering Services Agreement. Cost: $21,270.00 Funding Source: Miami -Dade County OCED Grant Account No. 106 -1724- 541 -3454. Backup Documentation: GI Proposed Resolution U TY Lin /HJ Ross' Service Work Order LI Current General Engineering Service Agreement with TY Lin /HJ w, Ross D Letter from Miami -Dade County OCED approving the expense U Map of Project Area „'7a.„,aMMMk?a-m 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF "4 SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ISSUE A 5 SERVICE WORK ORDER TO TY LIN /H.J. ROSS FOR PROFESSIONAL 6 ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES FOR 7 THE CHURCH STREET IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE 3, IN AN AMOUNT OF 8 $21,270.00 TO BE CHARGED TO THE MIAMI -DADE COUNTY OFFICE OF 9 COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (OCED) GRANT ACCOUNT 10 NUMBER 106 - 1724- 541 -3454; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE 11 12 WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida, wishes to provide 13 infrastructure improvements along Church Street; and 14 15 WHEREAS the City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida, wishes to use the 16 professional services of TY Lin/H.J. Ross for construction phase services for Church Street 17 Improvements — Phase 3 from SW 66th Street to SW 68th Street 18 19 WHEREAS, this Church Street Improvements — Phase 3 professional services will be 20 funded from the Miami -Dade County Office of Community & Economic Development Block 21 Grant for Fiscal Year 2006 grant. 22 23. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF 24 THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA THAT: 25 26 Section 1: The Mayor and City Commission authorize the City Manager to execute a 27 professional service work order with TY Lin/H.J. Ross for Church Street Improvement Phase 3 28 for an amount of $21,270.00. 29 30 Section 2: That the project's construction cost shall be charged to account number 106 31 1724 -541 -3454, with an account balance of $200,000.00. 32 33 Section 3. The attached agreement is made a part of the resolution. 34 35 36 PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of )2006. 37 38 ATTEST: APPROVED: 39 40 41 CITY CLERIC MAYOR 42 43 44 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: COMMISSION VOTE: 45 Mayor Feliu: 46 Vice Mayor Wiscombe: 47 Commissioner Palmer: 48 CITY ATTORNEY Commissioner Birts 49 Commissioner Beckman: TYLIN INTERNATIONAL HJ ROSS engineers I planners I scientists February 24"' 2006 Mr. W. Ajibola Balogun, REM Public Works Director City of South Miami Public Works Department' " 4795 S.W. 75"' Avenue Re: Construction Administrative Phase Proposal Church Street (SW 59`h Place) Improvements — Phase 3 Dear Mr. Balogun: We are pleased to submit this proposal to provide bidding assistance and construction administration services for the above - referenced project, as described in the attached Exhibit "A ". The estimated cost for these services is a lump sum fee of $ 21,270.00 We trust you will find this proposal acceptable and await your authorization to proceed. If in agreement, please initial the attached sheets, sign on page 4 and return one original for our records. Sincerely, T.Y LIN N ERN TIONAL/ . J. ROSS Jose M Nessi,. c 101 ices Coordinator,; Ene osures I 201 Alhambra Circle, Suite 900 Coral Gables, Florida 33134 T 305.567 1888 F 305 567.1771 www.tylin.com .r!, EXHIBIT «A» CHURCH STREET (S.W. 59TH PLACE) IMPROVEMENTS -PHASE 3 S.W. 68TH STREET TO S.W. 66TH STREET PROPOSAL FOR GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES L DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT The project consist of the reconstruction of portions of S.W. 591h Place, all within the City of South Miami (CITY) , Project elements include drainage, water main, sidewalks, paving, landscaping, electrical, and irrigation: TYLIN INTERNATIONALMMOSS (CONSULTANT) will provide construction administrative services for the above - referenced project. This work will be performed in accordance with the Professional Service Agreement for 'General Engineering Services (AGREEMENT) dated December 2004 as amended herewith. IL SCOPE OF SERVICES The specific work scope tasks to be performed by CONSULTANT and its sub'- consultant are: 1) PHASE V: CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION PHASE CONSULTANT agrees to provide the Phase V General Administration of the Construction Contract services in accordance with Paragraph 2.2.5 of the AGREEMENT with the following modifications: 1.1 CONSULTANT bases fee for this task on a construction time of 140 calendar days (20 weeks) from award of Construction Contract to approval, by the CONSULTANT, of Contractor's final Payment Certificate. 1.2 CONSULTANT bases fee for this task on conducting weekly site visits and part- time on -site observations at an average of twelve (12) hours per week, three hours per week of construction management and one and a half hour /week of project_ management. In the event that continuous daily on -site observations are required as stated' in Paragraph 2.2.5.E. of the AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT reserves the right to negotiate additional fees with the CITY at the hourly rates found in Section 4 of the AGREEMENT. 1.3 CONSULTANT bases fee for this task on participating on two (2) Public Involvement Meetings and one Meeting with the CITY's Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) at four hours each of project and construction management. III. SUBCONSULTANTS The below listed Sub - Consultants will assist in the performance of the project:' Sub- Consultant Name Specialty or Expertise Palm Engineering Group, Inc. Construction Inspection Services SCHEDULE OF DELIVERABLES Task" No. Description of Deliverable 1 Copies of Pre - construction agenda and minutes, shop drawings, change orders, payment 2 certificates, construction observation reports, test results, and ?correspondence. V. SCHEDULE OF SERVICES CONSULTANT shall perform the Work as "depicted in the table below following receipt of a written Notice -to- Proceed from the CITY. SCHEDULE OF WORK ( *) Task Task Name and /or Activity Description Duration Fee Basis 2 No. Task Name and /or Activity Description Work Projected Projected Traffic Engineering services identified in Paragraph 2. LD of the AGREEMENT; 5. days Start Date Finish Date 2 PHASE V: CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION PHASE 140 04 -01 -06 07 -10 -06 The ahove schedule assumes CITY will issue a Written Notice to Proceed on April 31, 2006 VI. COMPENSATION CONSULTANT shall perform the Work detailed in this Proposal for a Lump Sum, Fixed fee of $ 21,270.00 SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION Task No. Task Name and /or Activity Description Fee Amount Fee Basis 2 PHASE III CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION PHASE $21,270.00 Lump Sum, Fixed VII. SERVICES NOT INCLUDED The following services are not included in the Scope of Work for this project: 1. Roadway Engineering services identified in Paragraph 2. LA of the AGREEMENT. 2. Drainage' Design services identified in Paragraph 2. LB of the AGREEMENT. 3. Civil Engineering services for Sanitary Sewer System Evaluation and design identified in Paragraph' 2. LC of the AGREEMENT. 4. Traffic Engineering services identified in Paragraph 2. LD of the AGREEMENT; 5. Environmental Engineering services identified in Paragraph 2.1.E of the AGREEMENT. 6. Phase I services identified in Paragraph 2.2.1 of the AGREEMENT. 7. Phase II services identified in Paragraph 2.2.2 of the AGREEMENT. 8. Additional Professional Services identified in Paragraph 2.3 of the AGREEMENT. 9. Geotechnical Engineering Services including subsurface explorations and/or testing. 10. Permitting Services VIII. PROJECT MANAGER CONSULTANT's Project Manager for this Work Order assignment will be Jose Nessi. Prepared by: Jose M. Nessi Date Approved by: W. Ajibola Balogun, REM Date Public Works Director Construction Administration Phase 111 Category Rate Hours Total Project Manager 101 30 $ 3,030.00 Construction Manager 92 60 $ 5,520.00 Construction Inspection 53 240 $ 12,720.00 TOTAL $21,270.00 F c "ti PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT General Engineering Services THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this _ W day of & 1em►&r, 2(b # by and between the CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, referred to as the "CITY" and H.J. ROSS ASSOCIATES, INC., authorized to do business in the State of Florida, referred to as the "CONSULTANT" In consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants contained in this agreement, the CITY agrees to employ the CONSULTANT for a period ending on December 1,, 2007, and the CONSULTANT agrees to perform all professional services in connection with the WORK, as described herein, on a continuing basis in connection with projects where the basic construction costs does not exceed $500,000.00 or studies which do not exceed $25,000.00, herein after called the "SERVICES ". SECTION 1- GENERAL PROVISIONSs 1.1 The CONSULTANT may be issued a Notice to Proceed to encompass the entire Basic Services, as defined in paragraph 2.2 for a project, for a portion of the Basic Services, or for discrete tasks as specified in paragraphs 2.3 Additional Professional Services, for the purpose of reviewing work performed by other professional consultants or for other` miscellaneous engineering services that may be required. 1.2 A Notice to Proceed will be issued on an as needed basis at the sole discretion of the CITY. The CITY reserves, at all times, the right to perform any and all engineering work in -house or with other engineers. This Agreement does not confer on the CONSULTANT any exclusive rights to CITY WORK, ; nor does it obligate the CITY in any manner to guarantee WORK for ' the CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT may submit proposals for -any professional services for which proposals' may be publicly solicited by the CITY outside of this agreement. 1.3 The CITY will confer with the CONSULTANT before any Notice to Proceed is issued to discuss the scope of the WORK; the time needed to complete the WORK and the fee for the services to be rendered in connection with the WORK: 1.4 The CONSULTANT will submit a proposal upon the CITY'S request prior to the issuance of a Notice to Proceed. No payment will be made for the CONSULTANT'S time and services in connection with the preparation of any proposal. 1.5 The CITY agrees that it will furnish to the CONSULTANT plans and other data available in the CITY files pertaining to the WORK to be performed under this agreement promptly after each Notice to Proceed. 1.6 The CONSULTANT agrees to produce and distribute minutes, promptly after each meeting at which' their presence is required: 1.7 The CITY agrees to designate a representative who, on behalf of the City Manager shall examine the documents submitted by the CONSULTANT and shall render decisions promptly, to avoid unreasonable delay in the progress of the CONSULTANT'S services. The CONSULTANT shall keep the CITY'S representative advised on the project status at all times. 1.8 The CITY agrees to issue all directives and approval in writing. SECTION 2 - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2.1 General Engineering eering Services The professional services to be provided by the consultant are as follows: A. Roadway engineering to include streets, sidewalk, curb, gutter, drainage, associated traffic control devices, striping, lighting, speed reduction devices and incidental landscaping. B. Drainage Design includes the necessary analysis needed to implement proposed drainage improvements, preparation of paving and drainage plan for municipal building and facilities. C. Civil Engineering,, to include Water Distribution Systems Improvement / Analysis and design and Sanitary Sewer System Evaluation and design. D. Traffic engineering services will include daily volume counts, data analysis, preparation of conceptual 'improvements plan, present reports and recommendation to stakeholders and preparation of final traffic engineering report. E. Environmental Engineering, to including, site investigation and design needed to prepare remediation plans to mitigate underground storage tanks, hazardous waste materials and asbestos materials. F. Other incidental services associated to the above items. 2.2 Basic Services The Basic Services, for design and construction,; consist of six (6) phases described in Paragraph 2.2.1 through 2.2.6. The scope outlined below is applicable in its entirety to projects for which completed Basic Services are authorized. Upon authorization to proceed from the CITY, the CONSULTANT agrees to provide complete professional engineering services for any portion or all of the six Phases outlined below. The CONSULTANT agrees to co- ordinate his effort with that of any other engineering; landscape architectural or architectural CONSULTANTS to assure a coordinated and complete WORK. The lead' CONSULTANT as designated by the CITY shall prepare the final bid package including bid documents and specifications, which shall be prepared by, and be the responsibility of the respective disciplines. ■ Professional Services Agreement General Engineering Services December 2004 Page 2 of 16 2.2.1 Phase I- Preliminary and Schematic Design A. The CONSULTANT shall confer with representatives of the CITY and the using agency to determine the full ;scope of the Project that will meet the program requirements, and shall advise the CITY if, in the CONSULTANT'S opinion, the allocated funds are adequate to accomplish the program requirements. B. The CONSULTANT shall use proper and adequate design control to assure the CITY that the program requirements will be met. C. The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Design Concept and Schematic Report, comprising of the Project Timetable (Master Schedule), Planning' Summary (unless advised otherwise), Schematic Design Studies (unless advised otherwise) as defined below, and the Statement of Probable Construction Cost. D. The Proposed Project Timetable shall consist of a schedule showing the proposed completion date on each Phase of the Project through design, bidding, construction, and proposed date of completion. E. The Planning Summary (unless advised otherwise) shall consist of a vicinity plan and blow- up of the Site (if applicable) showing Project orientation, and a brief summary of all pertinent planning criteria used for the Project. F. The Schematic Design Studies (unless advised otherwise) shall consist of all plans, elevations, sections, etc. as required to show the scale and relationship of the parts and the design concept Of the whole. A simple perspective sketch, m: odel or photograph thereof may be provided to further show the design concept. G. The CONSULTANT shall present the Schematic design studies to the appropriate Boards for their approval when the project requires such approval. H. The CONSULTANT shall present the schematic design studies to all the appropriate utility companies (such as FPL, Southern Bell, Dynamic Cable, MDWASA, etc.:) for any conflict with their utilities. L The Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall include estimated cost of the Project including fixed equipment, professional fees, contingencies (if any), escalation factors adjusted to the estimated bid date, movable estimate (if any), and utility service extensions (if applicable). The CONSULTANT'S opinions of probable Total Project Costs and Construction Cost are to be made on the basis of CONSULTANT'S experience and qualifications and represent CONSULTANT'S best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer, familiar with the local construction industry and prices. ■ Professional Services Agreement General. Engineering Services December 2004 Page 3 of 16 7 r 7,7 ^a ,f,•, a. °:N ,- � ,?,s J. The CONSULTANT shall submit and present two (2) copies of all documents required under this Phase, without additional charge, for approval by the CITY and he shall not proceed with the next Phase until directed by the CITY. 2.2.2 Phase II — Study and Design Development: A. From the approved Schematic Design documents, the CONSULTANT shall prepare Design Development Documents, comprising the drawings, outline specifications and other documents to fix and describe the size and character of the entire Project as to construction and finish materials and other items incidental thereto as may be appropriate and applicable. B. The Design Development Documents shall comprise the Proposed Project Timetable (updated), Outline: Specifications, Updated Statement of Probable Construction Cost, and Design Development Drawings, etc., as required to clearly delineate the Project. '' If the Updated Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the allocated funds, feasible cost or scope reduction options shall be included. C. The CONSULTANT shall submit and present two (2) sets of all documents required under this Phase, without additional charge, for approval by the CITY and not proceed with the next Phase until directed by the CITY. D. The CONSULTANT shall at all times monitor the Probable Construction Costs to make certain they remain within the total allocated budget. A Notice to Proceed to Phase III will not be issued if the latest statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the total allocated funds, 2.2.3 Phase III :— Final Design / Construction Documents Development: A. From the approved Design Development Documents, the CONSULTANT shall prepare Final Construction Documents setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the Project including the Proposal (Bid) Form and other necessary information for bidders, Conditions of the Contract, and Complete Drawings and Specifications. CONSULTANT shall use Construction Specifications Institute (CSI) Standards and the City of South Miami Standard forms for the preparation of the proposal (bid) forms, Instructions to Bidders,' conditions of Contract and Specifications. The CONSULTANT shall review all existing City Specifications, for completeness prior to use and shall supply all needed additional specifications. B. The Construction Documents shall be prepared in a manner that will assure clarity of linework, notes, and dimensions, when the documents are reduced to 50% of their size. All drawings shall be on 24" x 36" paper ( "D" size), on the City's standard sheet format, unless approved otherwise: C. j All construction documents shall' be submitted in both "hard copy" and electronic media in a mutually agreed upon electronic format, but generally as follows: ■ Professional Services Agreement General Engineering Services December 2004 Page 4 of 16 1. Non- drawing submittals in Microsoft Office format. 2. Drawings in AutoCAD format. 3. GIS files should be in ArcView format Version 3.2 D. When the development of the drawings has progressed to at least 50% completion in Phase III, the CONSULTANT shall submit two (2) copies to the CITY for approval, without additional charge, along with updated outline specifications. The CONSULTANT shall also submit at this time an updated Statement of Probable Construction cost as indicated by time factor, changes in requirements, or general market conditions and an updated' Project Schedule. E. The CONSULTANT shall not proceed with the further development until approval of the 50% documents is received from the CITY. The CONSULTANT shall make all changes to documents. The 50% complete Check set shall be returned to the CITY.' F. A Notice to Proceed for the completion of Phase III will not be issued if the latest Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the total allocated funds, unless the CITY increases' the total allocated funds or the CONSULTANT and the CITY agrees on methods of cost reductions sufficient to enable construction within the funds available. G. Upon 100% completion of the Construction Documents, the CONSULTANT shall submit to the CITY a final, updated Statement of Probable Construction Cost along with two (2)' copies each of Check Set of drawings, specifications, reports, programs, etc., without additional charge, for final review and comments or, approvals. H. The CONSULTANT shall make all the necessary presentations to the appropriate CITY Boards (such as Environmental Review Board, Historical Preservation' Board etc.) for the final approval. L The CONSULTANT at no extra cost to the CITY shall make all required changes or additions and resolve all questions resulting from paragraph H if the changes or additions do not alter the scope of the project as determined under paragraph 2.2.1 A. The 100% complete Check set shall be returned to the CITY. Upon final approval by the CITY, the CONSULTANT shall furnish to the CITY a minimum of 24 sets of drawings and specifications, at no additional cost to the CITY, for bidding purposes, unless instructed' otherwise. J. The CONSULTANT shall arrange for "dry runs" and/or make final submissions to appropriate authorities (regulatory agencies to include and not limited to City, County, State or Federal) as necessary, to ascertain that the construction documents meet the necessary requirements to obtain all the necessary permits for construction. CONSULTANT shall' respond to all technical questions from regulatory agencies. CONSULTANT shall modify, at no additional cost to CITY, in order to acquire!, the necessary permits. ■ Professional Services Agreement General Engineering Services December 2004 Page 5 of 16 2.2.4 Phase IV - Bidding and Negotiation Phase: A. Upon obtaining all necessary approvals of the Construction Documents, and approval by the CITY of the latest Statement of Probable Construction Cost, the CONSULTANT shall furnish the drawings and specifications as indicated above for bidding, and assist the CITY in obtaining bids and awarding and preparing construction contracts. The CONSULTANT shall attend all pre -bid conferences. The CONSULTANT shall be present during the bid opening and as part of his assistance to the CITY will tally, evaluate and issue a recommendation to the CITY after verifying bond, insurance documents, questionnaire and reference submitted by the constructor. B. The CONSULTANT shall issue Addenda through, the CITY as appropriate to clarify, correct or change Bid Documents. C. If Pre- Qualification of bidders is required as set forth in the Request for Qualification, CONSULTANT shall assist City in developing qualification criteria, review qualifications of prospective bidders, and recommend acceptance or rejection of the prospective bidders.` D. If the lowest responsible Base Bid received exceeds the Total Allocated Funds the CITY may: I. approve the increase in Project Cost and award a construction contract or, 2. reject all bids and rebid the Project within a reasonable time with no change in the Project, or 3. direct the CONSULTANT to revise the Project scope or quality, or both, as approved by the CITY and rebid the Project, or 4. suspend or abandon the Project, or 5. exercise all options under the City Charter and State Law. NOTE: Under item (2) above, the CONSULTANT shall, without additional compensation, assist the CITY in obtaining re -bids, and awarding the re -bid of the project. Under item (3) above, the CONSULTANT shall, without additional compensation, modify the Construction Documents as necessary to bring the Probable Construction Cost within the Total Allocated Funds. When the lowest responsible bid is over 15% of the CONSULTANT estimate. E. For the purpose of payment to the CONSULTANT, the Bidding Phase will terminate and the services of the CONSULTANT will be considered complete upon signing of an Agreement with a Contractor. Rejection of bids by the CITY does not constitute cancellation of the project. 2.2.5 Phase V General Administration of the Construction Contract: A. The Construction Phase will begin with the award of the Construction Contract and will end when the Contractor's final Payment Certificate is approved and paid by the CITY. B. The CONSULTANT, as the representative of the CITY during the Construction Phase, shall advise and consult with the CITY and shall have authority to act on behalf of the CITY to the ■ Professional Services Agreement General Engineering Services December 2004 Page 6 of 16 i extent provided in the General Conditions and as modified in the Supplementary Conditions of the Construction Contract. C. The CONSULTANT shall attend pre - construction meetings, D. The CONSULTANT shall at all times have access to the project wherever it is in preparation or progress. E. The CONSULTANT shall visit the site at least weekly and at all key construction events to ascertain the progress of the Project and to determine in general if the WORK is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents. On the basis of on -site observations, the CONSULTANT will use reasonable and customary care to guard the CITY against defects and deficiencies in WORK. The CONSULTANT may be required to provide continuous daily on-site observations to check the quality or quantity of the WORK as set forth in this Agreement and defined by the Scope of WORK issued for the individual project. On the basis of the on- site observations, the CONSULTANT will advise the CITY as to the progress of and any observed defects and deficiencies in the WORK immediately in writing. F. The CONSULTANT shall furnish the CITY with a written report of all observations of the WORK made by him during each visit to the WORK. He shall also note the general status and progress of the WORK, and shall submit salve in a timely manner. The CONSULTANT shall ascertain at least monthly that the Contractor is making timely, accurate, and complete notations on record drawings. G. Based on observations at the site and on the Contractor's Payment Certificate, the CONSULTANT shall determine the amount due the Contractor on account and he shall recommend approval of the Certificate in such amounts. The recommendation of approval of a Payment Certificate shall constitute a representation by the CONSULTANT to the CITY that, he certifies to the CITY that the WORK has progressed to the point indicated, and the quality of the WORK is in accordance with the' Contract Documents subject to: 1. an evaluation of the WORK for conformance with the contract documents upon substantial completion.' 2. the results of any subsequent tests required by the contract documents. 3. minor deviations; from the contract documents correctable prior to completion and acceptance of the project. H. The CONSULTANT shall have an affirmative duty to recommend` rejection of WORK, which does not conform, to the Contract Documents. Whenever, in his reasonable opinion, he considers it necessary or advisable to insure compliance with the Contract Documents, he will have authority (with the City's prior approval) to recommend special inspections or testing of any WORK deemed not to be in accordance with the Contract whether or not such WORK has been fabricated and delivered to the Project, or installed and completed. • Professional Services Agreement General Engineering Services December 2004' Page 7 of 16 i e n L The CONSULTANT shall promptly review and approve shop drawings, samples, and other submissions of the Contractor for conformance with the design concept of the Project and for compliance with the Contract Documents. I Changes or substitutions to the Contract Documents shall not be authorized without concurrence with the CITY. J. The CONSULTANT shall review and recommend action on proposed Change Orders within the scope of the Project initiated by others, and initiate proposed change orders as required by his own observations. K The CONSULTANT shall examine the WORK upon receipt of the Contractor's Certificate of Substantial Completion of the Project. A Punch List of any defects and discrepancies in the WORK required to be corrected by the Contractor shall be prepared by the CONSULTANT in conjunction with representatives of the CITY and satisfactory performance obtained before the CONSULTANT recommends execution of Certificate of Final Acceptance and final payment to the Contractor. He *Shall obtain from the Contractor. all warranties, guarantees, operating and maintenance manuals for equipment, releases of lien and such other documents and certificates as may be required by applicable ;codes, laws, policy regulations and the specifications, and deliver them to the CITY. L. The CONSULTANT shall provide assistance in obtaining Contractor's compliance with the Contract Documents relative to, 1) initial instruction of CITY personnel in the operation and maintenance of any equipment or system, 2) initial start-up and testing, adjusting and balancing of equipment and systems, and, 3) final clean -up of the project. 2.2.6 Phase VI - Post Construction Administration A. The CONSULTANT shall prepare and provide the CITY with a written manual, to be used by the CITY, outlining the implementation plan of all the required maintenance necessary to keep the proposed WORK operational in a safe and effective manner. B. The CONSULTANT shall ftu-nish:l to the CTTY, reproducible record drawings updated based on information furnished by the Contractor, such drawings shall become the property of the CITy. C. The CONSULTANT shall assist in the inspection of the WORK one month before the expiration of any guarantee period or the sixth month whichever is earlier and report any defective WORK in the Project under terms of the guarantee /warranties for correction. He shall assist the CITY with the administration of guarantee /warranties for correction of defective WORK that may be discovered during the said period. 2.3 Additional Professional Services Additional Services as listed below are normally considered to be beyond the scope of the Basic Services for design and construction, as defined in this Agreement but which are additional services which may be authorized within the Scope of Work given the CONSULTANT. ■' Professional Services Agreement General Engineering Services December 2004 Page 8 of 16 4 A. Special analysis of the CITY'S needs, and special programming requirements for a project. B. Financial feasibility, life cycle costing or other special studies. C. Planning surveys, site evaluations, or comparative studies of prospective sites. D. Design services relative to future facilities, systems and equipment, which are not intended to be constructed as part of a specific Project. E. Services to investigate existing conditions (excluding utilities) or facilities or to make measured drawings thereof, or to verify the accuracy of drawings or other information` furnished by the CITY. F. Professional. detailed Estimates of Construction Cost consisting of quantity surveys itemizing all material, equipment and labor required for a Project. G. Consultation concerning replacement of any WORK damaged by fire or other cause during construction, and furnishing professional services of the type set forth in Basic Services as may be required relative to replacement of such WORK, providing the cause is found by the CITY to be other than by fault of the CONSULTANT. H. Professional services made necessary by the default of the Contractor or by major defects in the WORK under the Construction Contract, providing the cause is found by the CITY to be other than by fault of the CONSULTANT. I. Making major revisions changing the Scope of a project, to drawings and specifications when such revisions are inconsistent with written approvals or instruction previously, given by the CITY and are due to causes beyond the control of the CONSULTANT. (Major revisions are defined as those changing the Scope and arrangement of spaces and/or scheme or any portion). J. The services of one or more full-time Project Representatives. K. Preparing to serve or "serving as an ,expert ; witness in connection with any arbitration proceeding or legal proceeding in connection with a Project, L. Professional services required after approval by the CITY or the Contractor's Requisition for Final Payment, except as otherwise required under Basic Services. M. Preparing supporting data, drawings, and specifications as may be required for Change Orders affecting the scope of a Project provided the Changes are due to causes found by the CITY, to be beyond the control of the CONSULTANT. ■ Professional Services Agreement General Engineering Services December 2004 Page 9 of 16 SECTION 3 - TE E FOR COMPLETION: The services to be rendered by the CONSULTANT for any WORK shall be commenced upon written Notice to Proceed from the CITY subsequent to the execution of this Agreement and shall be completed within the time based on reasonable determination, stated in the said Notice to Proceed. A reasonable extension of time will be granted in the event there is a delay on the part of the CITY in fulfilling its part of the Agreement, change of scope of work or should any other events beyond the control of the CONSULTANT render performance of his duties impossible. SECTION 4 - 'BASIS OF COMPENSATION The CONSULTANT agrees to negotiate a "not to exceed" fee or a fixed sum fee for each of the WORK assigned to him based on the Scope of such WORK. Upon agreement of a fee, the CITY will issue a written authorization to proceed to the CONSULTANT. In case of emergency, the CITY reserves the 'right to issue oral authorization to the CONSULTANT, with the <understanding that written confirmation will follow immediately thereafter. For reproduction of plans and specifications, beyond the requirements as identified under Section 2- Professional Services the CITY will pay the direct costs. I The fees for Professional Services for each of the WORK 'shall be determined by one of the following methods or a combination thereof, as mutually agreed upon by the CITY and the CONSULTANT. A. A fixed sum: The fee for a task or a scope of work may be fixed sum as mutually agreed upon by the CITY and the CONSULTANT: B. Hourly rate fee: The CITY agrees to pay, and the CONSULTANT agrees to accept, for the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, fees in accordance with the following: Category Hourly Rate Principal $135 Project Manager $101 Senior Engineer $92 Engineer $72 Construction Manager $92 Construction Inspection $53 Senior Draftsman/Technical/CADD Operator $63 Draftsmen $53 Data Processing / Clerical $43 Hourly rates will include all wages, benefits, overhead and profit. I SECTION 5 PAYMENYAND PARTIAL PAYMENTS The CITY will make monthly payments or partial payments to the CONSULTANT for all authorized WORK performed during the previous calendar month. For design and construction projects where fee for each phase Professional Services Agreement { General Engineering Services December 2004 Page 10 of 16 I i 1 I is not specified, such payment shall, in the aggregate, not exceed the percentage of the estimated total Basic Compensation indicated below for each phase: 15% upon completion and approval of Phase I. 35% upon completion and approval of Phase H. 55% upon submittal and approval of 50% complete drawings and outline specifications of Phase III. 75% upon 100% completion and approval of Phases III and IV. 90% upon completion of the Project and approval of all WORK Phase V). 100% upon final completion and approval of WORK elements A and B of Phase VI. The CONSULTANT shall submit an original invoice to the City's project representative. The invoice shall contain the following information: 1. The amount of the invoices submitted shall be the amount due for all WORK performed to date as certified by the CONSULTANT. 2. The request for payment shall include the following information: a. Project Name b. Total Contract amount (CONSULTANT's lump sum negotiated upset limit fees) C. Percent of work completed, d. Amount earned. e. Amount previously billed. f. Due this invoice. g. Balance remaining h. Summary of work done this billing period. i. Invoice number and date. 3. Upon request by the CITY the CONSULTANT shall provide the CITY with certified payroll data for the WORK reflecting salaries and hourly rates. SECTION 6 - RIGHT OF !DECISIONS All services shall be performed by the CONSULTANT to the satisfaction of the CITY's representative, who shall decide all questions, difficulties and disputes of whatever nature which may arise under or by reason of this Agreement, the prosecution and fulfillment of the services, and the character, quality, amount and value and the representative's decisions, upon all claims, questions, and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the CONSULTANT does not', concur in the judgement of the representative as to any decisions made by him, he shall present his written objections'to the City Manager and shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. Nothing in this section shall mean to deny the right to arbitrate, by either party, in accordance with the Industry Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association. SECTION 7 - OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS All reports and reproducible plans, and other data developed by the CONSULTANT for the purpose of this Agreement shall become the property of the CITY without` restriction or limitation in connection with the ■ Professional Services Agreement' General Engineering Services December 2004 Page Y l of 16 i ` 1 owner's use and occupancy of the project. Reuse of these documents without written agreement from the CONSULTANT shall be the CITY'S sole risk and without liability and legal exposure to the CONSULTANT. When each individual section of the WORK completed under this Agreement is complete; all of the above data shall be delivered to the CTTY. SECTION 8 - COURT APPEARANCES, CONFERENCES AND HEARINGS Nothing in this contract shall obligate the CONSULTANT to prepare for or appear in litigation on behalf of the CITY without additional compensation except for any dispute arising out of this contract. The amount of such compensation shall be mutually agreed upon and be subject to a supplemental agreement approved by the City Commissioners and upon receipt of written authorization from the CITY prior to performance of a court appearance and conference. The CONSULTANT shall confer with the CITY at anytime during construction of the improvement contemplated as to interpretation of plans, correction of errors and omissions and preparation of any necessary plan thereof to correct such errors and omissions or clarify without added compensation. SECTION 9 NOTICES Any notices, reports or other written communications from the CONSULTANT to the CITY shall be considered delivered when delivered by courier or by mail to the CITY. Any notices, reports or other communications from the CITY to the CONSULTANT shall be considered delivered when delivered by the CONSULTANT in person or by mail to said CONSULTANT or his authorized representative. SECTION 10 - AUDIT RIGHTS The CITY reserves the right to audit the records of the CONSULTANT related to this Agreement at any time during the executiorn of the WORK and for a period of one year after final payment is made. This provision is applicable only to assignments that are on a time and cost basis. SECTION 11— SUBLETTING The CONSULTANT shall not sublet, assign, or transfer any WORK under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the CITY. SECTION 12 - WARRANTY The CONSULTANT warrants that he has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this contract and that he has not -paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT any fee, commission, percentage fee, gifts or any other considerations contingent upon or resulting from the award or imaking of this contract. For breach or violation of this warranty,-the CITY shall have the right to annul this contract without liability. SECTION 13 -TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT It is expressly understood and agreed that the CITY may terminate this Agreement without penalty by declining to issue Notice to Proceed authorizing WORK, in which event the CITY'S sole obligation to the CONSULTANT shall be payment for those units or sections of the WORK previously authorized in ■ Professional Services Agreement: General Engineering Services December 2004 Page, 12 of 16 I f i accordance with the provisions of Section 4, such payment to be determined on the basis of the WORK performed by the CONSULTANT up to the time of termination. SECTION 14 - DURATION OF AGREEMENT This Agreement, for the purpose of issuing new WORK shall remain in full force and effect for a period ending December 1 2007, although the actual completion of performance may extend beyond such term, or until the depletion of funds allocated for the WORK, or unless otherwise terminated by mutual consent of the parties hereto. SECTION 15 - RENEWAL OPTION This agreement may be renewed, at the sole discretion of the CITY, for a maximum of one two year term at the end of the initial period: SECTION 16 - DEFAULT In the event either party fails to comply with the provisions of this Agreement, the aggrieved parry may declare the other party in default and notify him in writing. In such event, the CONSULTANT will only be compensated for any completed professional services. In the event partial payment has been made for such professional services not completed, the CONSULTANT shall return such sums to the CITY within ten (10) days after notice that said sums are due. In the event of litigation by the other party to enforce the provisions of this contract, the prevailing party will be compensated for reasonable attorney's fees. In no event shall_ attorney's fees awarded against the CITY exceed 25% of the award for damages.. The CITY does not waive sovereign immunity from awards of prejudgment interest. SECTION 17 - INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION The CONSULTANT shall' not commence WORK on this Agreement until he has obtained all ` insurance required by the CITY. The CONSULTANT shall indemnify and save the CITY harmless from any and all claims, liability, losses and causes of actions arising solely out of a negligent error, omission, or act of the CONSULTANT incident to the performance of the CONSULTANT'S professional services under this Agreement. The CONSULTANT shall pay all claims and losses of any nature whatsoever, in connection therewith. The CONSULTANT agrees and recognizes that the CITY shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims, which may result from actions or omissions of the CONSULTANT's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions or acts of the CONSULTANT, the CITY in no way assumes or shares . responsibility or liability of the CONSULTANTS or Sub - consultants, the registered professionals under this Agreement. The CONSULTANT shall maintain during the term of this Agreement the following insurances A. Professional Liability Insurance in the amount of $1,000,000 with deductible per claim if any, not to exceed 5 %: of the limit of liability providing for all sums which the CONSULTANT' shall become legally obligated to pay as damages for claims arising out of the services performed by the CONSULTANT or any person employed by him in connection with this Agreement. This insurance shall be maintained for three years after completion of - the Professional Services Agreement General Engineering Services December 2004 Page 13 of 16 construction and acceptance of any Project covered by this Agreement. However, the CONSULTANT may purchase Specific Project Professional Liability Insurance which is also , acceptable: B. Comprehensive general liability insurance with broad form endorsement, including automobile liability, completed operations and products liability, contractual liability, severability of interest with cross liability provision, and personal injury and property damage liability with limits of $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. Said policy or policies shall name CITY as additional insured and shall reflect the hold harmless provision contained herein. C. Workman's Compensation Insurance in compliance with Chapter 440, Florida Statutes, as presently written or hereafter amended. D. The policies except for Section 17 A shall contain waiver of subrogation against CITY where applicable, shall expressly provide that such policy or policies are primary over any other collective insurance that CITY may have. The CITY reserves the right to request a copy of the required policies for review. All policies shall contain a "severability of interest" or "cross liability" clause without obligation for premium payment of the C=. E. All of the above insurance is to be placed with Best rated A -8 or better insurance companies, qualified to do business under the laws of the State of Florida. The CONSULTANT shall furnish certificates of insurance 116 the CITY 'prior to the commencement of operations, which certificates shall clearly indicate that the CONSULTANT has 'obtained insurance in the type, amount, and classification as required for strict compliance with this Section and that no reduction in limits by endorsement during the policy term, or cancellation of this insurance shall be effective without thirty (30) days prior written notice to the CITY.' Compliance with the foregoing requirements shall not relieve the CONSULTANT of his liability and obligations under this Section or under any other portion of this Agreement. SECTION 18 - AGREEMENT NOT EXCLUSIVE Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent the CTTY from employing ;other CONSULTANTS to perform the same or similar services. SECTION 19 - `CODES2 ORDINANCES ;AND LAWS The CONSULTANT agrees to- abide and be governed by all duly promulgated and published CITY, County, State and Federal codes, ordinances and laws in effect at the time of design which have a direct bearing on the ■ Professional Services Agreement General Engineering Services December 2004 Page 14 of 16' WORK involved on this project. The CONSULTANT is required to complete Public Entity Crimes Affidavit form (attached) pursuant to FS 287.133(3)(a). SECTION 20 - ENTIRETY OF AGREEMENT This writing embodies the entire Agreement and understanding between the parties hereto, and there are no other Agreements and understandings, oral or written, with reference to the subject matter hereof that are not merged herein and superseded hereby. No alteration, change, or modification of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by both parties hereto, upon appropriate action by the City Commissioners. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is accepted on the date first above written subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein. Authority of Resolution No.129- 04`1 /lV duly passed and adopted by the City of South Miami 'City Commission's) ATTEST: J CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI "'1Glaria Menendez, City erk Maria avis, City Manager' ATTEST: CONSULTANT: i'+ S.2GSS t-ft STATE OF FLORIDA J ss: Acknowledgement of City of South Miami COUNTY OF DADE ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this �� day o� ZI , 2004 by MARIA V. DAVIS and MARIA MENENDEZ, City Manager and City Clerk, respectively of the CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, on behalf of the CITY, who are personally known to me. Notary Public/State of onda p�AAtAL. RCIA Professional Services Agreement Q a {' Gf)MlAIS3i0NrIUtiSBEq General Engineering Services N� Cdt)61 E86 December 2004 yr IP pAV CoNtMtsstcr� EXPIR�s Page 15 of 16 �F Q F f ��' OCT. 2.200 Print name:... Commission No: (C) (0 a �' STATE OF FLORIDA ss: Acknowledgement of Consultant COUNTY OF DADS ) e foregoing instrument'was acknowIed ed before{ma this_ _a�:- —��day of ELO V �Pi'YI -2004 b Pcotana le, of 44 • S - � o s 5 Assoe -,xt y on behalf of the CONSULTANT. He is personally known to me or has produced A c as identification. aal� 41 a4,..e Notary Public, tate of Florida Print name. t rl A • he n v e 4 �s u , AUNA G: WNOCAL Commission No: Notay Puble - State of Florida APPROVED A/ AS TO FORM & CONTENT r mb>�o►t #BUD 366�20M eondedbrNlahona1N�rAW. City A1�0 y I ■ Professional Services Agreement General Engineering Services December 2004 Page 16 of 16 Community & Economic Development 140 West Flagler Street • Suite 1000 MIAMI•DADE Miami, Florida 33130 ® T 305- 375 -3422 F 305- 375 -3428 miamidade.gov ADA Coordination Agenda Coordination Animal Services Art in Public Places Audit and Management Services April 28, 2006 Aviation - Building. Building Code Compliance - Business Development Mr. W..Ajibola -. Balogun, REM, CFEA Capital Improvements Public Works & Engineering Director Citizens' Independent Transportation Trust City of South Miami Commission on Ethics: and Public Trust 4,7975 SW 75th .Avenue Communications Miami, FL 33155 - CommunityActionAgency .�+ - Community& Economic Development /+ -Re: FY2006:CDBG Contract - F Community Relations City of South Miami Consumer Services TYLIN International /HJ Ross Corrections & Rehabilitation Cultural Affairs Elections Dear Mr. Balogun: Emergency Management Employee Relations We have reviewed your proposed subcontract with TYLIN I nternational/HJ Ross Empowerment Trust for engineering services for Phase 3 of Church Street Reconstruction with a Enterprise Technology Services maximum compensation of $21,270 and have found it to be acceptable. It is Environmental Resources Management Fair Employment Practices noted that there are sufficient funds available in the latest approved budget. Finance Sincerely, Fire Rescue General Services Administration Historic Preservation. - Homeless Trust Housing Agency Silvia M. Unzueta Housing FinanceAuthority Acting Director Human Services Independent Review Panel SMU /RH International Trade Consortium Juvenile Services Medical Examiner - - -'.. -. Metro -Miami Action Plan Metropolitan Planning Organization - Park and Recreation Planning and Zoning Police Procurement Management Property Appraisal Public Library System Public Works Safe Neighborhood Parks Seaport Solid Waste Management Strategic Business Management Team Metro Transit Task Force on Urban Economic Revitalization ; Vizcaya Museum And Gardens i Water & Sewer 6487 6510 ( 6461 6420 6481 6500 i— — r 6501 r65 0 6505 6500 6501 N 6518 6516 U 6511 6532 H �' 6521 ss � O1 0 kn 6551 � 6571 6531 LO `� 0 CO END OF 6540 i 6591 5875 SW 66TH ST DROJECT m o m 6600 6601 t°o c°o En O C - 00 N to to O M f tdf { 04 O M t0 � LO L � o to 5963 �� 6647 'n h_ s rn SW 66TH TER` £, r L M L M C. Yom% 6669 M rn M M coo 0000 coo 00 Ln !f SW 67TH ST 5949 6709 BEb rntn�in� -ar- -� PROJECT SW 68TH ST 5950 N I ,L LO LO LO W E' S co 0 50 100 150 300 Feet 5907 m 1- Ln LO 6845 SW 69TH ST Made by'City of South Miami Engineering & Construction 2/14 /2006. GIS Data (Basic Set Level 11 by Miami -Dade County - :'.�, a ., —+' x.;- it � :" "£,^,m.<,, `b t ,., .�T: ,,r ,. ;T ,., ems. # :"x.• -,m . S!'fiW .� - }.•^w ,t ;5Y'�:'� ,., ?�. r n:� 3,: 11 V i'.. Tn^,. r„'Y. sG�s.'a�i.�rcSati � +3 �.,, t"... v;..4 . so U ry South Miami o� f H v AA- Amedca'ft CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI; INCORPORATED � fit o Rip �. OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM 2001 To: The Honorable Mayor Feliu and Members of the City Commission Via: Yvonne S. McKinley, Acting City Manager From: W. Ajibola Balogun, REM, CFEA, Director Public Works & Engineering Department Date: June 6, 2006 Agenda Item No.: Subject: ; Approval of Truck Crane repair work order. Resolution: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE WORK ORDER FOR TRUCK CRANE REPAIR BY AMERICAN TRUCK CRANE, INC. IN AN 'AMOUNT OF $6,390.27 TO BE CHARGED TO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT'S ACCOUNT NUMBER 001- 1760 -519- 4680; PROVINDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE Request: Authorizing the City Manager to approve work order for repairs to Truck Crane No. 21,35, Prentice 90F. Reason /Need: To perform repairs to Solid Waste crane used daily to provide trash pick -up services. We have obtained the attached 2 proposals from the only 2 approved dealers in South Florida. The lowest proposal was submitted by American Truck Crane, Inc. for $6,390.27. Cost: $6,390.27 Funding Source: I Account No. 001-1760-519-4680 Backup Documentation: 0 Proposed Resolution 7 Quotation submitted by American Truck Crane, Inc: U Quotation submitted by General Welding Service 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2 3 -4 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF 5 SOUTH MIAMI, ` FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO 6 EXECUTE WORK ORDER FOR TRUCK CRANE REPAIR BY AMERICAN 7 TRUCK CRANE, INC. IN AN AMOUNT OF $6,390.27 TO BE CHARGED TO 8 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT'S ACCOUNT NUMBER 001 - 1760- 519 - 4680; 9 PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE 10 11 WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission wishes to provide repairs to the Public 12 Works truck crane; and 13 14 WHEREAS, the repair service will be funded 'through the Public Works Department's -15 vehicles maintenance and repairs account number 001 -1760- 519 =4680 with an account balance 16 of $24,968.09, before this request. 17 18 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF 19 THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA THAT: 20 21 Section 1: The City Commission authorizes the City ;Manager to execute a repair 22 service work order with American Truck Crane, Inc. in an amount of $6,390.27. 23 24 Section 2: The service repair will be funded through the Public Works Department's 25 vehicles maintenance and repairs account number 001 - 1760 - 519 -4680 with an account balance 26 of $24,968.09, before this request. 27 28 Section 3: The service repair work order shall be made part of this resolution. 29 30 31 PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2006. 32 33 ATTEST: APPROVED: 34 35 36 CITY CLERK MAYOR 37 38 39 40 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: COMMISSION VOTE: 41 Mayor Feliu: 42 Vice Mayor Wiscombe: 43 Commissioner Palmer: 44 CITY ATTORNEY Commissioner Birts: 45 Commissioner Beckman: From: 305- 887 -6303 To: CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI Page: 2/2 Date: 5/16/06 3:10:10 PM AMERICAN TRUCK CRANE, INC. QUOTATION 10015 N.W. 87TH AVENUE MEDLEY, FL33178 Quote Number: 1028 LISA Quote Date: May 16, 2006 Page: 1 Voice: 305- 887 - 7170 Fax: 305 -887 -6303 CITSOU 6/15/06 Net 10th of Next Month 016W0 44.00 ATC- LABOR TRUCK 2135 PRENTICE 90F -BC SN 64.00 2,816.00 56699. TEAR DOWN & REPLACE CRANE MAIN SWING BEARING AND MOUNTING ` BOLTS. 1.00 PRC - 100172 TURNTABLE BEARING F90 2,674.76 2,674.76 20.00 PRC- 10028472 CAPSCREW- 5.01 100.20 1.00 PRC- 121006 GREASE FITTING 4.62 4.62 1.00 PRC- 125906 ELBOW 9.57 9.57 16.00 PRC - 307034 CAPSCREW 45.92 734.72 16.00 PRC - 305149 WASHER FLAT 3.15 50.40 1.00' ESTIMATE THE COST OF ANYALTERATION FROM THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS WILL BE COME AND EXTRA CHARGE OVER & ABOVE THE STIMATE. THIS NOT INCLUDE HIDDEN UNCOVERED DAMAGES. 1.00 ACCEPTANCE PROPOSA Above prices, specifications and conditions are here by accepted. You are >autorized to do the work as specified . Payment will be made as outlined above. 1.00 SN FREIGHT CHARGES NOT INCLUDED 1.00 SN ACCEPTED BY: DATE: Subtotal 6,390.27 Sales Tax Freight This fax was sent with FAXmaker FAX Server - For more information, visit: http : / /Www.gfifax.com Wednesday, May 24, 20062:56 PM Pedro Cid 305 -591 -8540 P.01 GENERAL WELDING SERVICE, INC. 8115 N.W. 56 Street - RI1ami, Florida 33166 Estimate Estimate Tel: 305- 592 -9483 - Fax- 305. 591 -8540 Date Estimate # 5 /24/2006 277 Name / Address city of South 1 Iianli 4M S.W. 75 Avc. Mianu, Fla. Div. Contact Rudy / Robert Description Total Replace damaged bearing assembly on crane. Remove damaged bearing and install new beathiLr assembly. ( as per illsttltctiollS ) 6,985.00' LABOR &'MATERIAL All material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be complete hi a workmanlike Subtotal 56,985.00 manner according to sawdA td practices. Any alrerorion or deviation from above involving extra costs will be executed only upon written orders. Our workers Sales Tax MON SO.00 speci$carions are fiilly covered by Workmen's Compensation Insurance. Total 56,985.00 Signature - _.. sour South Miami All edcaCRY . INCORPORATED CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 1927 OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM 2001 To: The Honorable Mayor Feliu and Members of the City Commission Via: Yvonne S. McKinley, Acting City Manage From: Alan Ricke, Parks and Recreation Director Date: June 6, 2006 Subject: Renovation of Palmer Park Baseball Fields Agenda Item# Resolution: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO DISBURSE AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $30,000.00 TO PROTURF, INC. FOR THE RENOVATION OF THE BASEBALL /SOFTBALL FIELDS AT PALMER PARK; TO BE CHARGED TO THE FLORIDA RECREATION DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (FRDAP) GRANT ACCOUNT NUMBER 001.0000.131.2221 AND THE PARKS :GRANT MATCHING FUND ACOUNT NUMBER 001.0000.219.3520; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE Request: We are requesting approval of the attached resolution authorizing the payment of $30,000.00 to Proturf,' Inc. for the renovation of the four existing baseball /softball fields at Palmer Park. Proturf submitted the lowest, most responsive quote for the work (see attached proposals). Reason /Need In July 2004, the Parks and Recreation Department was awarded a grant by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) through the Florida 'Recreation Development Assistance Program (FRDAP) to fund improvements to Palmer Park. The planned improvements include the renovation of the baseball /softball fields. The scope of work for this project includes regarding, resodding and the installation of additional ballfield' clay on each of the fields. This work, combined with additional work to come on the irrigation system will result in safer, more playable fields for the youth and adult leagues at the park. Cost: $30,000.00 Funding Source: $1,0,000.00 will be provided from the Florida :Recreation Development Assistance Program (FRDAP) account # 001.0000.13`1.2221 that currently has a balance of $54,838.36; and $20,000.00 will be provided from the , . {. --w W Mv Parks Grant Matching Fund Account 001.0000.219.3520 that currently has a balance of $21,690.00. Backup Documentation: Draft Resolution Copy of Proposals Page 2 of 2 7M71 W, PMT, J I RESOLUTION NO: 2 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF 4 SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO 5 DISBURSE AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $30,000.00 TO PROTURF, 6 - INC. FOR THE RENOVATION OF THE BASEBALL /SOFTBALL 7 FIELDS AT PALMER PARK; TO BE CHARGED TO THE FLORIDA 8 RECREATION DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (FRDAP) 9 GRANT - ACCOUNT NUMBER 001.0000.131.2221 AND THE PARKS 10 GRANT MATCHING FUND ACOUNT NUMBER 001.0000.219.3520; 11 PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; 12 13 WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Department has applied for, and received, grant 14 funding through the Florida Department of Environmental Protection's Florida Recreation 15 Development Assistance Program (FRDAP) for improvements to Palmer Park; and 16 17 WHEREAS, one element of the improvements project is the renovation of the 18 baseball /softball fields at the park; and 19 20 WHEREAS, Proturf, Inc. has provided the lowest responsive quotation for the planned 21 field renovations. 22 23 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY 24 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, THAT: 25 26 Section 1. The City Manager is authorized to disburse an amount not to exceed 27 $30,000.00 to Proturf, Inc. for the renovation of the baseball /softball` fields at Palmer Park. 28 29 Section 2. Payment in the amount of $10,000.00 be charged to the Florida Recreation 30 Development Assistance Program grant Account Number 001.0000.131.2221, and $20,000.00 be 31 charged to the Parks Grant Matching Fund Account Number 001.0000.219.3520, with current 32 balances of $54,838.36 and $21,690.00 respectively. 33 34 Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. 35 36 PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2006. 37 38 ATTEST: APPROVED: 39` 40 41 CITY CLERK MAYOR 42 43 Commission Vote: 44 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mayor Feliu: 45 Vice Mayor Wiscombe: 46 Commissioner Palmer: 47 CITY ATTORNEY Commissioner Birts: 48 Commissioner Beckman: 49 50 C:\Documents and Settings\ArickeWy Documents \Word Documents\ Resolutions\ PalmerFRDAPFieldRenovations:doc P C TU IF INC. PHONE: (345) 274 -0505 PAX: (305) 273 -9 010 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO FROM: Doug Baker Frank Reodo COMPANY AA7R City of South Mani 8/11/05 FAX NUMBER: TOTAL NO- OF PACr-.5 INCLUDING COVER: 305669 -1266 PHONE NUMBER-. SENDER'S REFERENCE NUMBER RE YOUR REFFRFNCF NUMBER: Proposal for Palmer Park ❑ URGENT 0 FOR REVIEW ❑ PLL'ASE COMMENT ❑ NLrASL•' REPLY 13 PLEASE RF.GYC:LL' NO'(E5 /COMMENTS Mr, Baker, please fiad attached the proposal you requested. Please feel free to contact me at your earliest convenience at Amy cell # 305 -915 - 7300. Prank PO BOX 557977 - MLAMI, FLORIDA 33255 -7977 Proturf, Inc. PROPOSAL PO BOX 557977 DATE August 12, 2005 Miami, Fl. 33255 -7977 Phone (305) 274 -0505 Fax (305) 273 -9010 Submitted To: City of South Miami Quotation valid until 90 days from Date Attn: Doug Bakes Prepared by: Francisco Regalado' 4975 S.W. 75th Avenue Miami, Florida 33155 Tel: Fax PROJECT: Palmer Park baseball field renovation: Note: Our proposal is based on the provided plans and specifications received lbrthe above mentioned project. All work is to be performed under standard working hours. No weekend or night time work is to be Included in this base bid. The following stated descriptive items are to be included herein our proposal as our scope of work. (items not mentioned shall not be assumed as included under this scope of work.) isri lion U � n1 mil/. $ fit�ti<� Total tlf' Field # 1 -Remove sod along 1 st b 3rd base side and `a 10' strip along infield and outfield radius. Laser grade and install certifed Bermuda 419 sod in 42" rolls. Prepare base Lump:Sum 1.00 $8,250.00 $8,250.00 along 1st & 3rd base for an additonal 50 tons of clay. Rottotil and Laser grade infield clay to proper grade. Field # 2 - Remove sod along 1st & 3rd base side and a 10'strip along Infield and outfield radius. Laser grade and Instal certified Bermuda 419 sod in 42" rolls. Prepare base Lump Sum 1.00 $8,250.00 _ $8,250.00 along 1st & 3rd base for an additonal so tons of clay. Rottotil and Laser grade infield clay to proper grade. Field # 3 - Remove existing turf 10' strip along Infield and outfield radius. Laser grade and install Lump sum 1.00 $6,750.00 $6,750.00 certifed Bermuda 419 sod In 42° rolls. Prepare. Rattotil and Laser grade infield clay to proper grade. Field # 4 - Remove existing turf 10' strip along Infield and outfield radius. Laser grade and Install;, t ump Sum 1.00 $6,750.00 $6,750.00 cortifed Bermuda 419 sod In 42" roils. Prepare. Rottotil and Laser grade infield clay to proper grade. TOTAL S3tlti0tfi�tlllf Comments: All excess material from regrading to be disposed of on -site Thanking you In advance for your business and the opportunity to provide a proposal. Acceptance of Proposal The above prices, specification and conditions are satisfactory and hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as oulined above.` Signature: Date Title .'- . 3=-? Nov 18 05 10:32a p.l RAILPARK MAINTENANCE INC. 110850 SW 1161h Str"-1 Miami, Florida 33176 Phone (305) 233.8133 rav (305 )233 -8133 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET TO. Doug Baker DATE: November 18, 2005 FAX: 305 -669 - 1266 PAGES: 2 FROM: Mr. Kevin Hardy RE: Palmer Park baseball fields renovation MESSAGE: Nov 18 05 10:33a P.2 Ballpark Maintenance Inc. 10850 SW 116 Street Miami FL 33176 Phone 305- 235 -5101 Submitted To: City of South Miami Attn: Doug Baker PROPOSAL RE: Palmer Park Baseball Field Renovation Scope of work: Field #I- Remove sod along the area on I". and 3`4. base to out of play fence; prepare areas for addition of new sod and clay; remove clay lip accumulation on infield outfield arch, level area for new Bermudagrass sod replacement; till clay infield to blend new 50 tons of infield clay; laser level clay for proper slope-, mat drag for infield finish' Total Cost Field #1 - 5 9,544.00 Field # 2 .Remove sod along l', base foul area, level area and install new Bermuda grass sod; remove clay lip accumulation on infield outfield arch, level area for new Bermudagrass sod replacement; till clay infield to blend new 54 tons of infield clay; laser level clay for proper grade to meet outside areas; mat drag for infield finish. Total Cost Field #2 S 9,313.00 Field # 3 - Remove clay lip accumulation on infield outfield arch, level area for new ; Bermudagrass sod replacement; till clay infield to blend new 25 tons of infield clay; laser level clay for proper grade to meet outside areas, mat drag for infield finish. Total Goat Field 43 - S 7,982.00 Field # 4 Remove clay lip accumulation on infield outfield arch, level area for new Bermudagrass sod replacement; till clay infield to blend new 25 tons of infield clay; laser level clay for proper grade to meet outside areas; mat drag for infield finish_ Total Coat Field #4 S 5,811.00 TOTAL COST $32,650.00 Alternate notion *Debris removal from site adk tiomrl SO75.00 Replacement of sod along baselines on fletd #1 &2 additional $1, 750 00 ,a.� '3WW 9" 7 ` =;r °:R ,�„.f, PRO GROUNDS PRODUCTS PAGE 02 05/25/2005 11:21 3052355196 — a OVIOG R '-T% UAid hi"i3ptSaf PRAUCTS INC. 8863 S.W. 129th Terrace Miami, Florida 33176 TEL: 305- 235 -5101 FAX: 305. 235.5186 TOLL FREE TEL: 886 - 558 -6156 TOLL FREE FAX: 866- 556 -2992 DATE 512512005 PROPOSAL NO. E398 cusT. too. TERMS Net 30 4 City of South "Miami SHIP Doug Baker Attention: Martha, Parks & Rec. City of South Miami 6130 Sunset Drive Parks Dept - Palmer Park South Miami, la 1.. 33143 P.O. No. roe PROJECT pending' ITEM DESCRIPTION QT7 RATE TOTAL co J Field I - Remove sod along the fouI ine 1 16,550.00 16,550.00 area on l st and 3rd base and prepare areas for aditional of 50 tons of new clay. remove clay accumulation on infield outfield arch, level area and replace Bermuda grass stud, till Clay infield add two loads of infield clay: latter level f lay for proper slope; finish drag to smooth clay. Haul all debris from property. CO J Field 2 - Remove sod along, the lout ine l 10,750.00 10,750.00 " area on l st and 3rd 'base and prepare areas for aditional. of 50 tans of new clay, remove clay accumulation on infield outfield arch, level area an& replace Bermuda grass sod; till clay infield add two loads of infield clay; layer level clay for proper slope; finish' drag to smooth clay. Haul all debris from property. Order, may Oe suDlect M surcnsr6e. Pro-C, ounds Products, Inc. iy only responsible for curbside deliveries. This p -oposal is only valid for 30 days from origination date Apprc ved by _ ___.., �_�_ Subtotal Bruce Batts _ Acce ed b} ._....:.._.:. _ Sales Tax (7.0%) Title:_ Total Print:- ..•....... _._ . Date: Page t 05/25/2005 11:21 3052355186 PRO GROUNDS—PRODUCTS PAGE 03 Pr® os S P R -od U CTS INC. DATE 512512005 PROPOSal. tVO. E398 6983 S.W.129th'Terrs a CuaT. NO. Miami, Florida 33176 TEL: 305 - 235 -5101 FAX. 308- 235-5186 TERMS Net 34 TOLL FREE TEL: 866-55 6.8156 -- TOLL. FREE FAX: 986- 556-2992 BtLC o: City of South Miami Doug Baker' Attention: Martha. Parks & Ree. City of South Miami 6130 Sunset Drive Parks Dept - Palmer 'ark South Miami, FL 33143 P.O. NO. FOB PROJECT pending 17�M OESCRIPTtON QTT RATE TOTAL CU. TS Meld 3 - Remove clay accumulation nn 1 9,550.00 9,550.00 infield outfield arch, level area and replace Bermuda grass sod, till clay infield acid two loads of infield clay, layer level clay for . proper slope; finish drag `toy smooth clay. Bahl all debris from property. , CO -1 Field 3 - Remove clay accumulation on l 7.850.00 7,850.30 infield outfield arch, level area and replace Bermuda grass sod, till clay infield add two loads ofintield clay, laser level `clay for proper slope; finish drag to smooth clay. Haul all debris frQm property: Order may be subject to surcharge. Pro -G unds Products. Inc. is only responsible for curbside deliveries. This p oposal is only valid for 30 days from origination bate. Appro ed by _ _....__ _ Subtotal $44,700.00 Bruce Bites Accep ed hy: Sales Tax (7.0 %) $0.00 Title: Total $44.700.00 Date' Page 2 u ry South Miami O tiSO 'yr a AN•A"Ca " CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI I.F INCORPORATED � .� 1927 �. OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER o Rto INTER- OFFICE MEMORANDUM 2 001 To: The Honorable Mayor Feliu and Members of the City Commission Via: Yvonne S. McKinley, Acting City Manager ; From: Alan Ricke, Parks and Recreation Director' Date: June 6, 2006 Subject: Repair of Athletic Field Lights Agenda Item # Resolution: A= RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO DISBURSE AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $8,000.00 TO FLORIDA ELECTRIC CONTRACTING SERVICE, INC. FOR THE REPAIR OF ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHTS AT PALMER PARK TO BE CHARGED TO THE HURRICANE.WILMA FEMA ACCOUNT NUMBERS 001.0000.115.5037 AND 001.0000.115.5035 AND THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT'S 'MAINTENANCE & REPAIR ACCOUNT NUMBER 001.2000.572.4620; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE Request: The Parks and Recreation Department is requesting approval to contract with Florida Electric Contracting Service, Inc. for repair of the athletic field lights at Palmer Park. ' The work requires specialty equipment only available through a handful of vendors. The Parks and Recreation Department will be 'piggybacking off of Broward County School Board Bid # 24 -052R for Security and Sport Lighting; Systems, Survey Identification, Preventive Maintenance, Repair and Installation (see attached). The best available time for this work is between the current youth baseball season and the upcoming youth football season. Reason /Need: Each year, the Parks and Recreation Department budgets for the replacement of lights on the ball 'fields at Palmer Park. This year; additional work on the ball field lights has become necessary due to the effects of Hurricane Wilma. A number of lights were affected by heavy winds and need to be re- aimed. Cost: $8,000.00 Funding Source: Funding for this purchase is included in the current Fiscal Year budget in the Parks and Recreation Department's Maintenance & Repair Account number 001.2000.572.4620 with a current balance of $6,049.22, and in the FEMA Hurricane Wilma Account numbers 001.0000.115.5037 and 001.0000.115.5035 with current balances of $4,375.00 and $625.00 respectively. Backup Documentation: Draft Resolution Copy of School Board of Broward County Bid # 24 -052R Page 2 of 2 IM erTT77 .t 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF 4 SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER 5 TO DISBURSE AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $8,000.00 TO 6 FLORIDA ELECTRIC CONTRACTING ' SERVICE, ` INC. FOR THE 7 REPAIR OF ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHTS AT PALMER PARK TO BE 8 CHARGED TO THE HURRICANE WILMA FEMA ACCOUNT 9 NUMBERS 001.0000.115.5037 AND 001.0000.115.5035 AND THE PARKS 10 AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT'S MAINTENANCE & REPAIR I 1 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001.2000:572.4620; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE 12 DATE 13 14 WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation Department must repair and/or replace athletic field 15 lights at Palmer` Park that have either burned out or were damaged as 'a result of Hurricane 16 Wilma; and 17 18 WHEREAS, The City Charter provides' for the City to make purchases through other 19 governmental agencies that have followed similar bidding procedures to the City's; and 20 21 WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Department wishes to access the School Board of 22 Broward County Bid # 24 -052R for Security and Sport Lighting Systems,' Survey Identification, 23 Preventive Maintenance, Repair and Installation awarded to Florida Electric Contracting 24 Service, Inc. 25 26 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY 27 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, THAT: 28 29 Section 1. The City Manager` is authorized to disburse an amount not to exceed 30 $8,000.00 to Florida Electric Contracting' Service, Inc. for the repair of athletic field lights at 31 Palmer Park. 32 33 Section 2. The first $5,000.00 of the payment be charged to the FEMA Hurricane' 34 Wilma Account' numbers 001.0000.115.5037 and 001.0000.115.5035 with current balances of 35 $4,375.00 and $625.00 respectively and the final amount up to $3,000 be charged to the Parks 36 and Recreation Department's Maintenance `& Repair Account Number 001.2000:572.5630 which 37 currently has a balance of $6,049.22: 38 39 Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW 47 I PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 12006. 2 3 ATTEST: APPROVED: 4 5 6 CITY CLERK MAYOR 7 $ Commission Vote: 9 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mayor Feliu: 14 Vice Mayor Wiscombe: 11 Commissioner Palmer: - 12 ' CITY ATTORNEY Commissioner Birts: 13 Commissioner Beckman: 14 15 16 CADocuments and SettingM icke\My Documents \Word Documents\ Resolutions \FloridaElectricPalmerPark.doc t. R ll. <i I...1ectric €° lC it!l :1` 1 c. i C .:a.i.:> ;(? t 14 }1 "i :. "� , of THE SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA r► - 7720 WEST OAKLAND PARK BOULEVARD, SUITE 323 • SUNRISE, FLORIDA 33351.4704 • TEL 754 -321 -0505 - BONNIE CARTER SCHOOL BOARD Dractor of PurrAoring April 20, 2004 CAatr CAROIX L. ANDREW& W&C 'Chat, STSPNANIE AXJAA KRAFT, M DUDIE 3: BUDNICK rDARLA L CARTER BMItLY A GALLAGHER Florida Elechic Contracting; Service, Inc. DIL ROBERT D. PARKS 1445 SW 210 Avenue L rYWExl�sRnNStEI)N Ft. Lauderdale FL 33312 smvlAMfN t, WILLIAMS DR. FRANK TILL '. _ fapenntantirnYn /Sehaal7..: Subject: LETTER OF AWARDICERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE Bid Number. 24 -0528 bescription Security and Sport Lighting Systems, Survey identification, Preventive Maintenance, Repair and Installation Term Contract: May I, 2004 through June 30, 2006 The School Board of Sroward' County, Florida has accepted your bid for Primary: Item X subject to compliance with subject bid specifications, terms and conditions, all pertinent laws of the State of Plorida and instructions as determined by the Attorney for the School Board.' The School Board of Broward County, Florida reserves the right to terminate this contract at any time and for any reason upon giving thirty (30) days prior written notice. Your Certificate of Insurance form and lndemndfication Clause where applicable must be an file in the office of Itfsk Management Department within fifteen (23) dove of this notification. It is important that you notify your insurance agent for general liability insurance that the insurance. requirements attached to the above bid require that The School Board of Browtard County, Florida, be included as an additionally nawd insured under the General Liability Policy. This information must be spgdrallg shad on the Certificate of Insurance submitted by your insurance; agent in order.for the Certificate to be acceptable. The above bid number must appear en the certificate submitted. No work can commence on the item(s) accepted on this bid until this Certificate of Insurance form is received and approved, and a written purchase order is released. The completed Certificate of insurance must be mailed to: WX MANAGEMENT DEPARTivIENT , The School Board of 13roward County, Florida, 7770 °W. Oakland Park Blvd 33351 and fax a copy to the PURCHASING DEPARTMENT AT (754) 321- 0534, Attached to this letter of agreement ir. the request for SBBC Photo Identification Badge(s) fori your representative(s). Please refer to Special Condition of the subject bid, the attached information and application forest: �4G rGY'• -• -.- Mark Alan Purchasing Agent III cc: Aston A. Henry Jr., Supervisor, Risk Management Department Bid Fite ,Enclosures Transforming Education. One student at A lime Braward Counry Public Schools Is An Equal Opporm„ lrelEqual Aeeers Emplaitr 8ld No. 24 -052R Page t t or 31 Pages The School Board of Broward County, Florida -REVISED- SECURITY AND SPORT UG14TING SYSTEMS, SURVEY IDENTIFICATION, PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND INSTALLATION SECTION S, BID WSIMARY SHEET UIV� TOTAL Cfl,�T i (TO BB AWARDED AS A GROUP) A. 1000 each SURVEY IDENTIFICATION ONLY for poles up to 50 feet high (Please see Attachment 'A'} $ 25.00 hr S' _L5.000.00, B. 500 each SURVEY IDENTIFICATION ONLY for poles greater than 50 feet high (Please we Atfachment'A'j $50-00 fir $--M. 000. 00 C 10,000 hours JOURNEYMAN ELECTRICIAN, hourly labor rate $ 3$.50 _ fir $285.000.00 0 10,000 hours ELECTRICIAN'S HELPER, hourly labor'rate $. S2 'lbr $ 120, g00. 0o EQUIPMENT RENTALS WITH OPERATORS, per hour, for an of the folio tng equipment, to include arty required operators and ransporldon to the sites, as required for projects and the Bid Spec"ons E. 1,400 bows 100 -foot bucket truck $ 85 00 thr $_!5.000.00 F. 3,600 hours $5 -foot bucket trunk $15.00 Aw !62.500.00 OL 300 boars 30400t, 2-man platform Im 40'00 fir 12,000.00 H. 1,200 hours Auger with pole setter, 9 foot digging depth with up f0 244nchdiameter $ 5.00 Aw $ 6,000,00 1.. 1,000 hours Auger with pole seller, 15-foot dl X0V depth with up to Winch diameter $ 75� � $-15-000-00 J. 1,300 hours Trencher whh line layer &2:2_ /hr $--L,500.00 K, 1,200 hours Trencher with 5 -foot digging depth and roCK chain $ 40.00 /hr 4� 8,000.01) TOTAL BID ITEM I (A — K Inclusive) - ----- -- ... $1,250.000.00 VENDOR NAME Florida Electric Contracting Service, Inc. MAAt Bid No. 24-052R Page 12 of 31 Pages The School Board of 6rowani County, Florida SECURt1Y AND SPORT LIGHTING SYSTEMS, SURVEY` IDENTIFICATION, PREVENnVE MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND INSTALLATION SECTION 5. BID SUMMARY SHEET ADDITIONAL RE ©ULR I IEQjUT10N FCR HOURLY tA80R RATES OVERTIME: Journeyman Electrician $57.75 !hr Etectrfdan's Helper $48.00 —/hr Rental Equipment Operator $48.00 ___/hr Bidder must state the times when overtime hourly rates apply other than normal S88C''working hours of 8 am to 5 pm, Monday through Friday: our nornal working hours are 7:00 Am to 300 PH (with' 1/2; hours for lunch) Mvadirg. through Friday. tk tside of these hours Overtise rates apply with the exception of Holidays, which are billed at the rates below WEEKEND: Journeyman Elec dan $57.75 hr. ElecMdan's Helper $48.00 _)hr Rental Equipment Operator ;f48,00 !hr Weekend labor rates will apply all day on Saturdays and Sundays only. HOLIDAY: Journeymen. Electrician. #Z7.Q4 - Mr Elec{riciads Helper $64.00 _ ..11►r Rental Equipment Operator $64.00 mr Bidder must attach a list of horxlays observed that qua* for holday labor rates, EMERGENCY CALL. - '..BACK: in accordance with rate structures above Joumeymm Electrician age above _/hr Electrician's Helper 6&i above fir Rental Equipment Operator see above Budder must state the minimum number of hours necessary for compensation (may not exceed 4 hours for any _ period on the clock, any day, any time.) 2 hr(s) Vendors Shen provide quality equipment, experienced operators, transport capabilities and all other approprde items to ensure maximum performance of equipment. Payment of the rental due to equipment failure will be prorated to the dm*ame when the equipment rented was used prior to failure, dependent upon the total equipment cost of Item vetted for the original 16nehme requested. VENDOR NAME: Florida Electric Contracting Service, Inc. MAAr Bid No. 24 -0528 Page 14 of 31 Pages The School Board ofBroward County, Florida SECURITY AND SPORT LIGHTING SYSTEMS, SURVEY mENTIFICATION, PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND INSTALLATION OTHER ADDITIONAL, IMRMATION ( ntinued) Bidder to state additional HOURLY RA'T'ES for other than listed equipment (including operators and transportation) available for this contract. If you need to use additional sheets, please include the bid number and the name of your cotapany,on each sheet EOUIPNIiIEIYT HOURLY RATE General Service Truck (including Journeyrnan Electrician) $48.50 85 -foot Bucket Truck $80.00 9 -ton Crane (telescopic wipin -on bucket 100 ft reach) $85.00 25 -ton Crane $110.00 40 -ton Crane $143.00 70-ton Crane $182.00 120-ton Crane $3,480 per DAY (I day min.) Texoma 500 -30 Auger Truck up to Y bit, 30' digging depth $85.00 Texoma Taurtawv Auger Truck, 3-6 diameter bit, 52' digging depth $220,00 Gel Pumping Truck (required for setting largo poles) $65.04 Backhoe $55.00 Skid Loader $55.00 Heavy Transport Truck $90.00 Missile Boring (up to 2" conduit; up to 50 feet) $20.80 per foot Disposal Pees: Concrete Poles $60.00 per ton ' Wood poles w /creosote $65.00 per ton t)� TUR' SE ES Electrical Engineering ` $100.00 per hour $ou ,� South Miami INCORPORATED CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 1927 a oA OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER INTER- OFFICE MEMORANDUM 2001 To: The Honorable Mayor Feliu and Members of City Corrmi o Via: Yvonne S. McKinley, Acting City Manager From: Alan Ricke, Parks and Recreation Director Date: June 6, 2006 Subject: Fourth of Jul Fireworks Agenda Item #-119 Resolution: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH FIREPOWER DISPLAYS UNLIMITED, INC. FOR THE ANNUAL JULY 4T" FIREWORKS DISPLAY; FOR A TOTAL PRICE OF $9,000.00, WITH DISBURSEMENT FROM THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 4T" OF JULY FIREWORKS ACCOUNT NUMBER 001 2000- 572 -4820; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE Request: We are requesting approval of the attached resolution authorizing the payment of $9,000.00 to Firepower Displays Unlimited, Inc. for the annual Fourth of July fireworks display at Palmer Park: Reason /Need: Each year, the Parks and Recreation Department budgets funds for the annual Fourth of July fireworks display at Palmer Park. In previous years, we have been able to "piggyback" on another municipality's bid for fireworks displays. This year we solicited bids (quotes) from several firms seeking the best qualified firm for the City's fireworks display. As of the deadline imposed upon the vendors, we have received two quotes (Firepower Displays Unlimited, Inc. and Bell's Firework Display' Co, Inc.). A third vendor (Best Fireworks & Special Effects) is considered a "no bid" due to lack of response. Firepower Displays Unlimited, Inc. provided the best quote in the amount' of $9,000.00 (see attached). Firepower Displays' Unlimited has provided the fireworks for the City of South Miami for the past several years, and has always performed admirably. Cost: ` $9,000.00 Funding Source: Funding for this purchase is included in the current Fiscal Year budget in the Parks and Recreation Department's Fourth` of July Fireworks account number 001.2000.572.4820 with a current balance of $10,000.00. 1�-;;- - Backup Documentation; Draft Resolution Copy of Proposals Page 2 of 2 _;. ^c;,x" 'T^;T ;,.,., ,: 3 ,. ,.�,� :s., - FE - ': i MAM r,.-U 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY, COMMISSION OF THE 4 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY 5 MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH FIREPOWER 6 DISPLAYS UNLIMITED, INC. FOR ` THE ANNUAL JULY 4TH 7 FIREWORKS DISPLAY FOR A TOTAL' PRICE OF $9,000.00, WITH 8 DISBURSEMENT FROM THE PARKS AND RECREATION 9 DEPARTMENT 4TH' OF JULY FIREWORKS ACCOUNT NUMBER 001 - 10 2000 -572- 4820; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 1T 12 WHEREAS, Each year, the Parks and Recreation Department budgets funding for a 13 fireworks display as part of the Fourth of July festivities at Palmer Park; and 14 15 WHEREAS, The Parks and Recreation Department has = solicited bids from reputable 16 fireworks vendors to provide the fireworks display for 2006; and 17 18 WHEREAS, Firepower Displays Unlimited, Inc. has provided the lowest, most 19 responsive quotation for this year's fireworks display, and has provided the City of South Miami 20 with spectacular` fireworks displays in the past. 21 22 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY 23 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA THAT: 24 25 Section 1. A purchase order be awarded to Firepower Displays Unlimited, Inc., in the 26 amount of $9,000.00, charging the _amount to the Parks and Recreation Department 4th of July 27 Fireworks account number 001. 2000.572.4820, which currently has a balance of $10,000.00. 28 29 Section 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon approval. 30 31 PASSED AND ADOPTED this _ day of , 2006. 32 33 ATTEST:` ` APPROVED: 34 35 36 CITY CLERK MAYOR 37 38 Commission Vote: 39 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mayor Feliu: 40 Vice Mayor Wiscombe: 41 Commissioner Palmer: 42 CITY ATTORNEY Commissioner Birts: 43 Commissioner Beckman: 44 45 CADocuments and Settings\ArickeNy Documents \Word Documents \Resolutions\Fireworks2006.doc MerJun.��l.�`200�6 8: 25AMA p City Of South Miami mp ao�- 25s -s5ao No. 3368 P. 2 ., .., 1 — I Pit � UP- c } i' � r\ It /rte 1r t } IDISIP. �.� Ci � �, k4EAR8Efi 6� SPECTACULAR CUST011f FIREWORKS DISPLAYS & SPECIAL FX Creatively Designed For Anti .Special Occasion s ST =id FEI��t'.^�iP.ii't`if' ,A3 r Y�zex�.� kD6.s1°e'.9 {� MEM1IBER CONTRACT FOR FIREWORKS DISPLAY Sponsors City of South Miami Contact Alan Ricke, Director of Parks & Recreation Date of display July e'. 2006 Rain Date July 5th, 2006 Location Palmer Park Time After Dusk - approx 9':15pm Duration Approximately 12 -15 minutes Show Price $9,000.00 Deposit $4,500.00 Remarks We the undersigned, being interested in a fireworks display for City of South Miami agree to pay a price of $9,000.00 for the display agreed upon, which will be furnished by Firepower Displays Unlimited, Inc. The undersigned, intending to be legally hound, agree as follows= 1. Sponsor to make a deposit payment of 50% of the contract price upon signing of contract, but no later than 30 days prior to display. 2. Sponsor to make balance of payment immediately after the display. 3. in the event Sponsor shall fail to pay any sum when due under the terms of this contract, Sponsor shall pay. in addition to such amount, interest at fife rate o mR rdo per on the uunpaid�amou t from the original dueerdda� tge3ep onsof -ZW it Cher agree that ras5nabe a orney es and court costs in the event ' ' t too shall commence suit or incur fees to compel �cczF� ertu�c� hereunder or otherwise as a result o €-- &,er�e�s- c: Ir+ e R p AAry's default of any of the terms and provisions herein contained. 4, SPONSOR'S AGENT: Alan Ricice shall be designated as sponsor's agent to whom all questions and inquiries shall relay all questions and inquiries. Sponsor's agent shall be the only agent of sponsor authorized to request rescheduling of the delivery and exhibition of the fireworks on the part of sponsor. P.O. BUX 4095 - Friucann, FL 33032 A 71M ULT MATE 131 �� I-tl. (305) 258 -1118. F 8-5 ox: (305) 2ssso _ SPEC(AGIZING IN: WARE130USE & Siifrl'ING y`t FBWO't" 7MWAIl`Ih=T lA?40:5_Wi�fi +SBitYrinctton, Fl. 33032 COTlbnesn, C¢Atrat dL South amrrics► Shows w%vw.firepouerditp1nys cone ,s�'.. a,Exs^,— ,n- n..^9;t-,.r, -'°`.- .. ,'$tr�� . ,.::�+P;, � ��,? ,: r�.-.ar�-ar�;:s?pra'� .`; _nB," ,,, ,+3, f �—r-r�., ;-.-�^ -, �:.1,,. �' " s,"+' r' ." ,: ,".•�'�'�3�°�.= --- *�r,',T�.�. "'.. .. ,�,- .�-�,. 7, ;. , .. ..;s 3> _.,�r �, M;T_.?. Mar 24 06 02:06p BNHC /FP 305 -258 -5580 p.3 5. If event is on land, sponsor to furnish police and /or crowd security personnel, provide proper parking supervision, and insure adequate patrol of the safety zone as marked and secured by the sponsor until Firepower Displays Unlimited, Inc. advises that it is no longer necessary. 6. If event is over water, Firepower Displays Unlimited will be responsible for marine permit. The Sponsor will be responsible for control of'safety zone; 7. Firepower Displays Unlimited, Inc. reserves the right to stop the display in the event persons, vehicles or animals enter the secured safety zone and security is unable or unwilling to remove them and enforce the safety regulations. 8. Firepower Displays Unlimited, Inc. will furnish all applicable licenses, permits and $3,000,000 liability insurance and pyrotechnician for your electronically fired display. 9. Hold harmless Firepower Displays Unlimited, Inc. from any claims that do not directly relate to damages produced by its staff, equipment or pyrotechnic material. 10.CREDITS: As a material inducement to Firepower Displays agreeing, to enter into this agreement. Sponsor shall give Firepower Displays program credit as sole fireworks supplier' and 'producer in all press releases, advertising, and any other program announcements, printed or otherwise. 11. If show is canceled, sponsor is responsible for any permit, fire watch; or barge /tug fees, if applicable. Additionally, sponsor will be responsible for load in/ load out expenses not to exceed 25% of budget. If show is stopped while in progress for any reason; Sponsor will still be responsible for contract amount minus the cost of material not discharged. 12. If wind exceeds 20 miles per hour, fireworks display will be postponed to an agreed date between sponsor and Firepower Displays Unlimited, Inc. 13. Rain date policy is ',a follows: Postponement time is 11:30am day of display. 14. If the ` delivery and /or exhibition of the fireworks are postponed by reason of inclement weather', it shall be re- scheduled to the Inclement Weather Date set forth by Sponsor. 15. IMPORTANT NOTE: Items listed in this proposal assume a firing area that conforms to NFPA Code 1123= 1995, which states that there must be at least 70 feet per inch of shell diameter between firing site and any spectators, cars or buildings. This program requires a`safety zone`that has a radius of 420 feet because of the inclusion of 6-inch shells. Adjustments will be made to the content of this program if necessary to conform to'NFPA 1123- 1995! Firepower Displays Unlimited, Inc., upon acceptance of this contract in writing, agrees to fulfill the contract in a workmanlike and professional manner. Accepted this day of On behalf of City of South Miami, Alan Ricke, Director of Parks & Recreation On behalf of Firepower Displays Unlimited, Inc., , Gary Avins,,;President Mar 24 06 02:06p BNHC /FP 305- 258 -5580 p.4 OVER 600 SHOTS — Assorted Opening Barrage, Titanium Reports, Whistles, Assorted Color, Tourbillions. 30 - THREE INCH SHELLS, TITANIUM SALUTES'— these shells explode into a burst of brilliant' white' lights and booming reports, ASSORTED COLOR, PEONIES & CHRYSANTHEMUMS — bursts resembling a round and weeping flower pattern. 18 = FOUR INCH SHELLS - ASSORTED COLOR, PEONIES & CHRYSANTHEMUMS — bursts resembling a round and weeping flower pattern, FANCY STAR SHELLS — Assorted brilliant colors in various patterns; SPIDERWEBS — long hanging fine webs of gold or silver, ASSORTED COLOR & CRACKLING EFFECTS:— assorted color peonies and chrysanthemums with crackling effects, WILLOWS -;very fine lines with an umbrella Like effect cascading slowly, ASSORTED COLOR BROCADES - a dense golden, silver or assorted color effect ending at the tips with an umbrella -like canopy cascading and falling low. 8 -FIVE INCH SHELLS - FANCY STAR SHELLS - Assorted brilliant colors in various patterns, ASSORTED TWO and THREE COLOR CHANGING CHRYSANTHEMUMS PEONIES — two or three distinct color changes that resemble a round and weeping flower pa: ttern. Mar 24 06 02:07p BNHC/FP 305- 258 -5580 p.5 LLB �l'.'.'�� GL2�`� • J � . 210 - THREE INCH SHELLS, ASSORTED COLOR, PEONIES & CHRYSANTHEMUMS — bursts resembling a round and weeping flower pattern,` ASSORTED COLOR & CRACKLING EFFECTS — assorted color peonies and chrysanthemums with crackling effects, FANCY STAR SHELLS — Assorted brilliant colors in various patterns, SPIDERWEBS — long hanging fine webs of gold silver or assorted colors, GOLDEN, SILVER, GLITTERING OR CRACKLING PALM TREES — a palm tree image with different forms with trunk -like rising effect; ASSORTED TWO COLOR CHANGING CHRYSANTHEMUMS & PEONIES — two distinct color changes that resemble a round and weeping flower pattern, ASSORTED COLOR BROCADES a` dense golden, silver or assorted color effect ending at the tips with an umbrella' -like canopy cascading and falling low: 162 - FOUR INCH SHELLS, ASSORTED COLOR, PEONIES & CHRYSANTHEMUMS — bursts resembling a round and weeping flower pattern, WHISTLES — a break of color, followed by whistles, SCREAMING DRAGONS - a break of bright magnesium colors followed by loud screaming whistle, GOLD FLITTER, SILVER OR GLITTER CROSSETTES - exploding comets crackling into criss - crossing effects, FANCY STAR SHELLS Assorted brilliant colors in various patterns, SPIDERWEBS — long hanging fine webs of gold or silver, TOURBILLIONS — titanium silver spinning effects, WILLOWS — golden, silver or assorted colors of very fine lines with an umbrella like effect' cascading slowly, RINGSHELLS — assorted ring patterns of different colors of one, two, three or five different colors, GOLDEN, SILVER, GLITTERING OR CRACKLING PALM TREES — a palm tree image with trunk -like different forms, ASSORTED TWO and THREE COLOR CHANGING CHRYSANTHEMUMS & PEONIES — two or three distinct color changes that resemble a round and weeping flower pattern, STROBES — a variety of bright twinkling shells, ASSORTED COLOR BROCADES — a dense golden, silver or assorted color effect ending at the tips with an umbrella -like canopy cascading and falling low, MULTI- BREAK SALUTE SHELLS — a variety of salute effects that incorporate multiple powerful reports into the display. 72 FIVE INCH SHELLS, FANCY STAR SHELLS Assorted brilliant colors in various patterns. SPIDERWEBS — Long hanging fine webs of gold or silver, TOURBILLIONS - titanium silver spinning effects; GOLD FLITTER, SILVER OR GLITTER CROSSETTES — exploding cornets crackling into criss- crossing effects, WILLOWS - ;golden, silver or assorted colors of very fine lines with an umbrella like effect cascading, RINGSHELLS — assorted ring patterns of different colors of one, two, three or five different colors,' GOLDEN, SILVER, GLITTERING OR CRACKLING PALM TREES - a palm tree image with different forms with trunk -like rising effect, GOLD OR SILVER RAIN — slow cascading gold or silver effect, ASSORTED TWO, THREE & FOUR COLOR CHANGING CHRYSANTHEMUMS & PEONIES — two, three or four distinct color Mar 24 06 02:07p BNHC /FP 305 -258 -5580 p.6 changes that resemble a round and weeping flower pattern, STROBES - a variety of bright twinkling shells, ASSORTED COLOR BROCADES — a dense ,golden, silver or assorted color effect ending with an umbrella -like canopy cascading and falling low, MULTI -BREAK SALUTE SHELLS — a variety of salute effects that incorporate multiple powerful reports into the display, STAR FISH — group of ,large glittering tail comet stars, CRISS- CROSS OR BEES, assorted color bees or criss-cross. 48 - SIX INCH SHELLS, FANCY STAR SHELLS - Assorted brilliant, colors in various, patterns, SPIDERWEBS — long hanging fine webs of gold or silver, TOURBILLIONS — titanium silver spinning effects, GOLD FLITTER, SILVER` OR GLITTER CROSSETTES — exploding comets crackling into criss-crossing effects, WILLOWS - golden, silver or assorted colors of very fine lines with an umbrella like effect cascading slowly, RINGSHELLS - assorted ring patterns of different colors of one, two, three or five different colors, GOLDEN, SILVER, GLITTERING PT CRACKLING PALM TREES - a palm tree "image of different forms with trunk -like rising effect, GOLD OR SILVER RAIN — slow cascading gold or silver effect, ASSORTED TWO, THREE & FOUR COLOR CHANGING CHRYSANTHEMUMS & PEONIES —two, three or four distinct color changes that resemble a round and weeping flower pattern, STROBES — a variety of bright twinkling shells, ASSORTED COLOR BROCADES — a dense golden effect with an umbrella -like canopy cascading and falling low, ASSORTED COLOR PARACHUTE — assorted cascading effect from parachute, SHELL OF SHELLS OR THOUSAND FLOWER — multi -color star shell with additional smaller shells dispersed outside' resembling blooming flowers, MULTI- BREAK SALUTE SHELLS — a,variety of salute effects that incorporate multiple powerful titanium reports into the display, ASSORTED COLOR & CRACKLING EFFECTS — assorted color peonies and chrysanthemums with crackling effects': WILLOWS - very fine lines with an umbrella like effect cascading slowly, FANCY PATTERNS — five pointed star shapes, hearts, smiling face, etc..., STAR FISH — group of large glittering tail comet stars. �71R 'a 7 ..- Mar 24 06 02`.07p BNHC /FP 305- 258 -5580 p.7 :1 w ✓.: A y r 360 - THREE INCH SHELLS, TITANIUM SALUTES —these shells explode into a burst of brilliant white lights and booming reports, ASSORTED COLOR, PEONIES CHRYSANTHEMUMS — bursts resembling a round and weeping flower pattern, WHISTLES —a break of color, followed by whistles, FANCY STAR SHELLS —Assorted brilliant colors in various patterns, SPIDERWEBS - long hanging fine webs of gold or silver, ASSORTED COLOR & CRACKLING EFFECTS - assorted color peonies and chrysanthemums with crackling effects, WILLOWS - very fine Lines with an umbrella like effect cascading slowly, ASSORTED COLOR BROCADES — a dense golden, silver or assorted color effect ending at the tips with an umbrella -like canopy cascading and falling low, WILLOWS - very fine lines with an umbrella Like effect cascading slowly. 72 FOUR INCH SHELLS, ASSORTED COLOR, PEONIES & CHRYSANTHEMUMS — bursts resembling a round and weeping flower pattern, WHISTLES — a break of color, followed by whistles, FANCY STAR SHELLS —Assorted brilliant colors in various patterns, SPIDERWESS — Tong hanging fine webs of gold or silver, ASSORTED COLOR & CRACKLING EFFECTS — assorted color peonies and chrysanthemums with crackling effects, WILLOWS - very fine lines with an umbrella like effect cascading slowly, ASSORTED COLOR BROCADES — a dense golden, silver or assorted color effect ending at the tips with an umbrella -like canopy cascading and falling low. 16 FIVE INCH SHELLS - FANCY STAR SHELLS — Assorted brilliant colors in various patterns, ASSORTED TWO and THREE COLOR CHANGING CHRYSANTHEMUMS & PEONIES'— two or three distinct color changes that resemble a round and weeping flower pattern. 6 - SIX INCH SHELLS - FANCY STAR SHELLS — Assorted brilliant colors in various patterns, ASSORTED TWO and THREE COLOR CHANGING CHRYSANTHEMUMS PEONIES'— two or three distinct color changes that resemble a round and weeping flower pattern. OVER 1,200 SHOTS — Assorted Finale Barrage, Titanium Reports, Whistles, Assorted Color, Tourbillions. OPENING BODY FINALE TOTAL SHELLS 3" SHELLS 30 210 360 600 4" SHELLS 18 162 ` 72 262 5" SHELLS 8' 72 16 96 6" SHELLS 48 6 54 OPENING BARRAGE Over 600 shots FINALE BARRAGE Over 1,200 shots S Miami .- $9K - 7 -4 -06 1c..,".?'..�,' —^�— ?^?;.ter l°^'.; .'z",:',�"� OM BELL'S FIREWORKS FAX NO. : 813 933 8536 May. 23 2006 11 :18AM P1 ELL 'S FIREWORK DISPLAY CO, INCe 7901 N. Armenia Avenue ' Tampa, FL 33604 (81'3) 935 -8810 Fax (813) 933 -8536 Email bells@atlantic.net www.bellsfiireworks.com To: Maria EIeua Tuesday, May 23, 2006 City of South Miami Parks Dept, DISPLAY DATE: 07/04/2006 5800 SW 66 Street RAIN DATE: TBD South Miami, FL 33143 Phone # (305) 668 -7231 Fax # (305) 668 -7388 DISPLAY QUOTE 1) Bell's Fireworks Display Co will not provide the following service due to being booked on this date. However all content herein is accurate towards conducting this e of service. An assortment of premium display shells, which will consist of different effects, colors, and patterns. Such as Color changing chrysanthemums, Color changing peony's, Brocade diadem, Scattering, Go- getters, Double peddle chrysanthemums, Meteor's, Crossette shells, Shell of Shell's, Multi - salute shell's, And pattern shells 'such as, Color rings, Ilearts, Stars, and Ring -n -Hour glass shell's just to name a few. SIZE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DISPLAY TIME Assorted Exhibition Repeaters 1,800` 15 -18 minutes 3" Premium Color & Salute 600 V Premium Color & Salute 252 V Premium Color 096 6" Premium Color 054 Total amount of rounds — 2,802 Opening, Main body, and Finale is included in above shell count Bell's Fireworks Disylgy Company reserves the right to substitute shell's of equal or 2111-e—r value in the event of shortages and/or if the minimum viewing distance listed is less than the .m.inimum standard re uirement of the N_F.P.A. codes 1123.2006 and/or 1126.2006 edition (Minimum viewin a distance required 420 Ft.) 2.)Transportation and storage All transportation to and from the display in approved' storage containers, 3.) Certified crew All ''labor to set up and fire the display, including certified pyrotechnicians to supervise and assist in the entire operation. All operators and assistants will either meet or exceed the minimum required standards of the National Fire Protection Association and comply with all FEDERAL, STATE,` and L4CAL`laws governing fireworks displays. FROM BELL'S FIREWORKS FAX NO. : 813 933`8536 May. 23'2006 11:19AM P2 0 f I ELL S FIREWORK INC 7901 N. Armenia Avenue Tampa, FL 33604 (8.13) 935 -8810_ Fax (813) 933 -8036 t Email: bells@atlantic.net www,bellsfireworks.com 4.) Fireworks dis la' liability One million dollars in fireworks display liability insurance. Sponsor and any other entities will be listed as additional insured under the certificate of insurance. The insurance will be activated at the Lime of acceptance of this contract and deposit or payment has been made to Bell's Firework..-, Display Co., Inc. 5) Bell's Fireworks comppy promise: " Exceeding Your Expectations" Over the past 23 years, Bell's Fireworks has earned the reputation for reliability, dependability, and top quality in every aspect of the fireworks industry. Each and every display, whether outdoor or indoor, is a unique creation custom tailored for the occasion_ There is not one display done twice. Our products may change as manufacturers come and go, but our time - tested commitment to quality and service remains the same. 1,) Sponsor will provide the following_ A`420 -foot minimum viewing distance from the discharge site to the public viewing area, along with ample security to maintain the entire display site. We will assist in blocking off the display area with Danger Do Not Enter banner guard. 2,1 Local permits; Obtaining all permits from the local authorities for fireworks displays. Bell's Fireworks Display Co., Inc_ will obtain all permits necessary for outdoor public fireworks displays. 3.) Display amount and terms of payment: A display price in the sum of $15,000.dollars and.00cents. A deposit of 50% with acceptance of this contract in cash or check, and 50% on date of display in cash or check. If payment can be made in .full with acceptance of this contract Bell's Fireworks Display Co. will apply an additional 3% of product to the display a: t no additional cost to the sponsor. Averaged Display Value of $18,000 00 4.) Rain date and cancellation. clause: In the event of inclement weather or postponement, there will be a zero - percent charge applied for resetting the display. Rain date is limited to a seven day maximum. The sponsor may postpone the display at his/her discretion, provided that the display is postponed to a date no longer than seven days of the first scheduled date, unless other arrangements have been made between the sponsor and Bell's Fireworks Display Co. The postponed display must take place at the original display site. If no rain date is set the deposit will be used to cover all expenses incurred by Bell's Fireworks Display Co. l /�JU1 N. Armenia Avenue Tampa, FL 33604 (813) 935 -8810 Fax (613) 933 -8536 Email: bells @atlantic.net www.bellsfireworks.com 5.) Inventory confirmation Person responsible for inventory confirmation, Mari: kleua or his/her appointee. Bell Display Co. reserves the riLyht to terminate the display at any time in the event that erson s enter the secured danger zone and security is unable or unwillin r to enforce the safety re ' ations. or Other conditions wind or rain that would pose a safe1y hazard to any peTgon(s) or` pronerLy, with out flit Penalty what so ever directed towards Bell's Fireworks Display Co Inc Robert M. Stahl Date Maria F.,leua Date President City of South Miami Parks Dept. Bell's Fireworks Display Co. Quote void if not executed 75 days prior to display date. . , • ' , -. h „ m.: ,. ..�.y -�.. ,,.� s.., .; ate >�;, ,;-�., P. 1 Memory TX Result Report ( May, 22, 2006 3:09PM) 1) City Of South Miami mp 2) Date /Time: May.22. 2006 3:09PM File Page No. Mode D e s t i n a t i -on P (s) Resul t IN ot Sent 3313 Memory TX 93052599966 P. 1 OK Reason for error E.1) Ha.ng u or line fa'i1 E.2) Busy E.3) No answer E.4) No facsimile connection E..5) Exceeded' max. E —mail size FAX FAX FAX FAX CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY CENTER 5800 SW 66 STREET SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 33143 305- 668 -7231 ne information contained in tkisjacsinrUe message is confrdendar and is intended onnjor the use ofthepemon to whom Isis directed Ifyou have received this, facsimile fe error, phase notify the Parks & Recreation oRke at305- 668 -7231 Thankyou Date' a2 it �e Number of Pages — Sne -Je.s Cover P-ae - rv: - FraH K COMP4NYNAME: f6r'LladlxslI FROM yv�al i w �. Slbu� r4 7� RE: See below Hard Copy ( J Sent O Not Sent a Commexis: tJy sY. L��t?Aesra7.. O� W le .:OWN a-. Sent by: FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX Memory TX Result Report ( May, 18, 2006 406PM) m m m P: 1 J) City Of South Miami mp 2) Date /Time; May; 18, 2006 4:05PM File Page No. Mode_ Destination Pg(s) Result Not Sent 3283 Memory TX 93052599`966 P. 2 OK Reason for error E. 1) Hang up or l i n e fail E. 2) Busy E. '3) No answer E.4) No facsimile connection E:5) Exc -eeded max. E —mail size FAX FAX FAX FAX CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY CENTER 5800 SW 66 STREET SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 33143 305- 668 -7231 The rr�formaaon contained in this facstwile message is confrdentral and is intended only far the use of the person to wham it Is directed Ifyon, have received d1is fwwatile'in error, Please notEfy the Parks A Rerreadon office at305 -668 -7231. Thankyou Date: 10� Number of Pages -coda ' TO: � tYLu COA(t'ANYNAME lies 4 c r "� t X}e 0.S �eCca tact -s FRONT: RE. See below Llard Copy f I Sent C )Nat Sent A., a Sent by: FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX m m Memory TX Result Report ( May. 2. 2006 12 :52PM) m m P, 1 1) City Of South Miami mp 2) Date /Time; May, 2. 2006 12,51PM File Page No. Mode Destination Pg(s) Result Not Sent 3225 Memory TX 93052599966 P. 2 - OK Reason' for error E. 1') =Hang up or l i n e f a i l E. 2) Busy E. 3)'No answer E.'4) No facsimile connection E. 5) Exceeded max. E —mail size FAX FAX FAX FAX CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI PARKS 8c RECREATION DEPARTME14T SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY CENTER 5800 SW 66 STREET SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 33143 305- 668 -7231 The information contadned iii lhdsfaadrdfe message is confidemdal and ds intended onWor the use of the person to wham dt is directed lfyou have received this fat simUe In error, please nedjy the Parks & Rrereaaon office at 303 - 6.68 -72 L Thank you. Date. —h g::,4 Z 06 Number of Pages z . -- COMPANYNAAM. FROM. RE. See below Hard Copy( ) Sent O Aat Sent ez c !cam �r Comments« sent 8p: / FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX I RESOLUTION NO: 2 3 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION 5 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO 6 WAIVING REQUIREMENTS OF RESOLUTION 27 -03 -11576 7 FOR THE ROTARY CLUB OF SOUTH MIAMI FOR THE 8 EVENT SPONSORED BY THE ROTARY CLUB, WHICH 9 EVENT SHALL BE NAMED THE SOUTH MIAMI ROTARY 10 ART FESTIVAL; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE: 11 12 13 WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission' of the City of South Miami 14 desire to continue to encourage the existence of an annual art festival during the 15 last weekend in February, similar to the former South Miami Arts and Crafts 16 Festival; and, 17 18 WHEREAS, for the past 22 years the Red Sunset Merchant's Association 19 and the Rotary Club of South Miami (RSMA and Rotary) have jointly sponsored 20 the South Miami Arts and Crafts Festival; and, 21 22 WHEREAS, The City understands that RSMA is not, and Rotary is, 23 interested in continuing to sponsor future festivals in the same tradition as the past 24 22 years; and, 25 26 WHEREAS, The City understands that Rotary intends to continue to 27 sponsor an annual festival event and name it the "South Miami Rotary Art 28 Festival" ( SMRAF); and, 29 30 WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission desire to afford the same 31 status and privilege to Rotary's new SMRAF as has been traditionally extended to 32 the RSMA and Rotary jointly sponsored SMACF event, by waiving the 33 requirements of the City's special event 'permit policy adopted under resolution 34 27 -03- 11576, provided, "however, that the Rotary shall reimburse the City for its 35 Police and Public Works expenses and shall provide insurance for the event; and, 36 37 WHEREAS, Rotary shall coordinate with the South Miami Police 38 Department regarding scheduling and coordinating SMRAF and ensuring proper 39 security for the event; and, 40 Additions shown by underlining and deletions shown by °v°r r'�g. I WHERAS, Rotary shall not be required to pay any additional rental charges 2 to the city for the special event, but, may be required to pay for necessary clean -up 3 services; and, 4 5 WHERAS, ` Rotary shall not be required to pay any lost parking meter 6 revenues to the city for SMRAF; and, 7 8 WHEREAS, the ` Mayor and City Commission agree to annually close 9 Sunset Drive for SMRAF; and, 10 11 WHEREAS, Rotary shall be required to obtain public liability insurance 12 coverage, which policy shall name the city as an additional insured for the date,' 13 time, and location of the sponsored event, in the amount of $1 ,000,000, prior to 14 the event date. 15 16 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND 17 CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA;' 18 19 Section 1. The above whereas clauses are incorporated by reference. 20 21 Section 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon approval. 22 23 PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of June, 2006. 24 25 ATTEST: APPROVED: 26 27 CITY CLERK MAYOR 28 29 COMMISSION VOTE: 30 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mayor Feliu: 31 Vice Mayor Wiscombe: 32 Commissioner Birts- Cooper: 33 Luis R. Figueredo, office of City Attorney, Commissioner Palmer: 34 Nagin Gallop & Figueredo, P.A. Commissioner Beckman: Page 2 of 2 ..a,n t� 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2 3 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY 4 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, 5 FLORIDA, RELATING TO RULES OF PROCEDURE OF 6 THE CITY COMMISSION, AMENDING CHAPTER 2 7 SECTION 2 -2.1 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE 8 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, ENTITLED "RULES OF 9 PROCEDURE OF THE CITY COMMISSION "; BY 10 CHANGING THE DATE OF REGULAR COMMISSION 11 MEETINGS; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL, CODIFICATION, 12 SEVERABILITY, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 13 14 15 WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami hold 16 commission meetings on the first and third Tuesday of the month, except during the months of 17 June and July, when the meetings are held on the first two Tuesdays in June and last two 18 Tuesdays in July and 19 WHEREAS, it has come to the attention of the Mayor and City Commission that a 20 percentage of the South Miami Community has difficulty attending Tuesday night commission 21 meetings due to scheduling conflicts and meetings 22 WHEREAS all regularly scheduled commission meetin s shall be held on the first 23 third Thursday of the month, except during the months of June and July, during which months, 24 the meetings shall be held on the first and second Thursday of June, and the last two Thursdays 25 of July; and 26 WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission desire to change the City Commissio'In Is 27 Rules of Procedure in order to hold city commission meetings on the Thursdays, rather than I, 28 Tuesday evenings. 29 30 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY 31 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA THAT: 32 Section 1. Section 2 -2.1, of the City's Code of Ordinances is amended as follows: 33 34 Sec. 2 -2.1. Rules of Procedure` of the City Commission. 35 The following rules of procedure shall govern all meeting of the city commission, 36 namely: Additions shown by underlining andldeletions shown by ^°~ Z'!f: .n;TP°„- R°- •"F',3.» ':., m..'dfiFE. � ,. "?iy4t4: »+F2`^tiff'e-;f" %rei"F d..e+.5m .Sk :, a:' z'Tt.:" tom., "T'?'�PS?.. "'9ie.m qT.RQTi._^.,^ 7i,.;.'tY 1 2 (A) REGULAR MEETING. The city commission shall hold regular meetings at 7 :30 3 p.m., on the first and third Tuesdays Thursday of each month with the exception of the 4 months of June and July. The city commission shall hold regular' meetings at 7:30 p.m. 5 on the first and second Tuesdays Thursdays of June and the last two (2) Tuesday 6 Thursdays of July. When the day set for any regular meeting falls on a day designated by 7 law as a legal, public, national or religious holiday, such meeting shall be held on the 8 next succeeding day ` following such holiday. Regular meetings may be otherwise 9 postponed, canceled or reset only by resolution adopted at a regular meeting of a majority 10 of the entire in of the commission. All regular meetings shall be held in the 11 commission chambers located in the city hall. 12 13 No meeting of the city commission shall extend later than 11:00p.m., except upon the 14 affirmative vote, of a majority of members present at the meeting. Any and all items not 15 considered by this limitation time period will be deferred to the next regular scheduled 16 commission meeting. 17 18 Section 2. Repeal. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict or inconsistent are 19 repealed. 20 Section 3. Severability. If any word, clause, phrase, sentence, paragraph or section of 21 this ordinance is' held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such declaration of 22 invalidity shall not affect any other word, clause, phrase, sentence, paragraph or section of this 23 ordinance. 24' Section 4. Codification. This ordinance shall be codified and included in the Code 25 of Ordinances. 26 27 Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective upon passage by the City 28 Commission on second reading. 29 30' PASSED AND ADOPTED this _ day of , 2006. -31 32 ATTEST: APPROVED: 33 34 Additions shown by underlining anQueletions shown by ig I CITY CLERK MAYOR 2 3 1" Reading — 4 ` 2 "d` Reading — 5 6 COMMISSION VOTE: 7 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM Mayor Feliu: g Vice Mayor Wiscombe 9 Commissioner Beckman: 10 Luis R. Figueredo, Commissioner Birts: 11 Nagin Gallop & Figueredo, P.A. Commissioner Palmer: 12 Office of City Attorney 13 14' I Additions shown by underlining I I and3deletions shown by ever - g. is ,M1rTi.'+°3,���i°�'.°,.v ^, .- ^^sry`.'. ...'F?"A'.°Nii,,"rx �.. ,'��,f"'�%.- �.;°•' .�.xC�R° „ ,.�... ;1T�9.a. '"�.'�' =.. Xi ".. ,.. 4 T �H.- In ;i f'^4r�"�- � ::am "?T .t' }VY.�.. �.;n+e- �, ,'gym- �'as-r�- �.P'.�..._"' ". .Fr..'�".A� .. �. .... x,`•F M MIAMI DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays Miami, Miami -Dade County, Florida STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADE: Before the undersigned authority personally appeared O.V. FERBEYRE, who on oath says that he or she is the SUPERVISOR, Legal Notices of the Miami Daily Business F f k r < 3 Review f /k/a Miami Review, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami in Miami - Dade , - �1 �a County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, k� a t�� 0. being a Legal Advertisement of Notice in the matter of ��' ea g 0�TCE�1JLIGkE1RINt! as CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI y` " itsa itx'@ a$ s S� ' PUBLIC HEARING 6 /6/2006 ;:NOTICE SHOE BYgI `e. 10t,fhe� tyCo�mmisslonof�heCttyafSouth Miami Florida wtll oondutlt a Pub1i .N"ring at Its`�eptylsi Clty,Commis= $slop meeting scheduiO4'16KTuesday" June 6 2006 begin ning at 7 30) in he XXXX Court, ;pm in the ChV Commtssiorf Chambers 6130 Sunset Dnve; to consltlerf was published in said newspaper in the issues of thelfowin �iem t ;, 05/19/2006 �4N ORdINANE�OFTitk iMAYOR ANDCITY COly1MIS$ION OF THE CITY OFSOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, 0101 ATING�TO j `RULES OF 146CE Wko, t P THEfi'.CITY COMMISSION Affiant further says that the said Miami Daily Business: ^ AMENDINGt�HAPTERIZ %ftT ON412 2: I F TF�EtCODE C!F Review is a newspaper published at Miami in said Miami-Dade irtORDINAIyCES,aOFTHECIsTY OFSbUTHiMIAMI;IrNTITLEII= County, Florida and that the said newspaper has ",RULES OF,PROCEIIUIiEkOF THE CIT1/ COMMISSIONStBY� t heretofore'been continuously published in said Miami Dade County i MEETINGS � ROVID NGFOFR;REPEALL RCOD F CATION,. Florida, each day (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) sr , SEVERABILITY; AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE 4 office n entered as Miami class for ae post �e tr fA ems can bemspectd is theClry Clerk s OfficMonday"Fnday3 period of one year next preceding the first publication of the dunng rd§6Idroffice'hours d attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he or T+`5\; she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation �If4ydul�pave, ny inlnes onfe above Ite►iis pleaseicon£acf the Ciry; any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose Cerk s offioe at 305.663 -604Ci h y of securing this ad vertisem publicatiomin the said x # a newspaper. p s are invltedo attenand will be beard ALL interested artle Mependek. CMC -, PyrSuant Flontla Sta utes; 286 0105, the $City here Y adwtse`s the. Sworn to and subscribed before me this pubhcthat ifaypersontlecldestoappeal any�decislh0made bythls; Boartl Agencyjor Commisstga with resaect'torany mattes 66 at; 19 day of MAY A.D. 2006 Its meetingyorheanngjhejar s..e,'wlil need a record,of thetproceedin s;� andthat forsuohj�urpose sifeotedperson maytneeti toensuretfia a uebatlm re+cbrdzoftheproceedings3ls,matle whlch�recottlinclusles�thei testimony antl evldenee upon which the appeal is to bebased a,.tl6 -0 E4/681 "096M' (SEAL dm Cheryl H Marmer O.V. FERBEYRE personally know t ej� Cm.,,. DD33b55g br w Wires July 18, IF17-n F- I i So u ry South Miami AH- AmedcaCity INCORPORATED •' CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI • �� 0 2to OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM 2ooi To: The Honorable Mayor Feliu and Members of the City Commission From:, Commissioner Jay Beckman Date: June 6, 2006 Agenda Item No.: Subject: Miami- Dade County's Proposed Traffic Circle for the intersection of SW 64th Street & SW 67th Avenue Resolution: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING MIAMI -DADE COUNTY'S RECOMMENDATION TO INSTALL A ROUNDABOUT AT THE INTERSECTION OF SW 64TH STREET & SW 67TH AVENUE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE Request: Accepting Miami -Dade County's recommendation to install a roundabout at the intersection of SW'64th Street & SW 67th Avenue. Reason /Need: To provide much needed traffic calming along SW 64th Street & SW 67th Avenue corridors. Cost: No cost for design and construction of the roundabout. However, the County is asking the City to provide and maintain landscaping and irrigation in the proposed circle. Funding Source: Not Applicable. Backup Documentation: ` ❑ Proposed Resolution ❑ Conceptual design of the proposed circle. 1 RESOLUTION No. 2 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF 4 SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA,' ACCEPTING MIAMI -DADE COUNTY'S" 5 RECOMMENDATION TO INSTALL A ROUNDABOUT AT THE INTERSECTION' OF 6 SW 64TH STREET & SW 67TH AVENUE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE 7 8 WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission wishes to provide traffic calming at the intersection 9 of SW 64th Street & SW 67th Avenue; and 10 1I WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission accepts the recommendation of the County to 12 install "a roundabout at the intersection of SW 64th Street & SW 67th Avenue' and ask the County to 13 'proceed with final engineering design and construction: and 14 15 WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission authorize the City Manager to work with Miami 16 Dade County on whatever steps it takes to accomplish the project. 17 18 NOW, THEREFORE,, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF 19 THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA THAT: 20 21 Section 1 That the City accepts the recommendation of the County to install a roundabout at 22 the intersection of SW 60 Street & SW 67th Avenue and ask the County to proceed with final 23 engineering design, and construction. 24 25 Section 2: That the Mayor and City Commission authorize the City Manager to work with 26 Miami -Dade County on whatever steps it takes to accomplish the project. 27 2$ Section 3 This resolution shall take effect immediately upon approval 29 30 PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 2006. 31 32 ATTEST: APPROVED: 33 34 35 CITY CLERK MAYOR 36 37 38 39 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: COMMISSION VOTE: 40 Mayor Feliu: 41 Vice Mayor Wiscombe: 42 Commissioner Palmer: 43 CITY ATTORNEY Commissioner Bids 44 Commissioner Beckman: 45 6 8 49 50 51 9 2 3 - 54 Technical Support Construction of Roundabout At 67 Avenue = 64 Street Intersection Prepared By Commissioner Jay Beckman May 06 DVD`Included With Report Appendices The Appendices have been previously distributed to the City Commission. Additional copies can be obtained from the City Clerk. The following is included: Appendix A - Residents Petition in Favor of Roundabout Appendix B - General Information on Roundabouts Appendix C - Traffic Flow Analysis of Proposed Roundabout 1 Summary The purpose of this report is to show that the roundabout design is the best option for redesign of the 67 AV - 64 ST intersection. Three objections have been raised to the roundabout, all of which are unfounded the roundabout will result in longer delays at the intersection, the roundabout will not allow the passage of buses and large trucks, the roundabout' crosswalks will not be safe. This report shows that the roundabout will actually result in better traffic flow, easier passage of buses and large trucks, and safer crosswalks than the signalized intersection. There are also additional benefits of the roundabout over the signalized intersection which are described in this report. Background Residents complaints about the existing 67 AV -64 ST signalized intersection have included that vehicles routinely speed, drive on the road shoulders to make right turns, and the speeding and reckless driving makes the crosswalks unsafe. Miami -Dade County Public Works Department has proposed two design options for the reconstruction of the intersection - expansion of the two lane roads to three lanes at the intersection with a light signal, or a roundabout (see Exhibits 1 and 2). A large proportion of residents within 500 feet of the intersection have signed a petition favoring the roundabout' over a three lane signalized intersection (see Appendix A). A Resolution (see Exhibit 3) has been put forward to request that the county proceed with detailed design and construction of the roundabout because it is a safer, more functional, and more aesthetically pleasing design. General information on roundabouts is included in Appendix B. Design Features and Benefits of Proposed Roundabout Affect on Adjacent Single- Family Properties The roundabout design structures are not any more physically intrusive on the adjacent properties than the three lane signalized design. The slower vehicle speeds and more aesthetically pleasing, features of the roundabout benefit the neighborhood. Approach and Circulatory Speeds The roundabout is designed to slow vehicles to 20 -25 MPH. This allows safe, orderly flow with few collisions and no head -on or high speed collisions. < It also allows vehicles to quickly respond to pedestrians and bicyclists. This is shown in the DVD. Design Vehicle The roundabout is designed to effectively accommodate both small vehicles (cars, SUVs, pickups, small trucks) which will be over 95 percent of traffic, and buses and large trucks. This is accomplished by providing an Inscribed Circle Diameter large enough to accommodate the turning radius of the largest truck that will traffic the roundabout, a Circulating Width of Road wide enough to accommodate the wheel path of small vehicles which will not use the truck apron, and a Circulating Width of Road Plus Truck Apron wide enough to accommodate the wheel path of large trucks (see Exhibit 4). 2 For both cars and large trucks, driving through the roundabout will be easier than for the signalized T- intersection. There is no interaction of vehicles turning left across high speed on- coming traffic. Large trucks have sufficient room to maneuver through the roundabout, where small T- intersections do not have a sufficient turn radius. Vehicles standing at the red light on the leg of the intersection where the truck is turning have to back up to get out of the wheel path of the truck: The Central Island, Truck Apron, and Inscribed Circle Diameter for the San Amaro roundabout shown in the DVD is very similar to the proposed roundabout design for 67 AV - 64 ST. The San Amaro roundabout has an inscribed circle diameter of 107 feet versus 104 feet for the proposed 67 AV - 64 ST roundabout. The DVD shows buses and large trucks easily circulating through the San Amaro roundabout. It also shows slow, orderly and efficient flow of small vehicles. Capacity and Flow An*sis Traffic flow through the roundabout will be better than the signalized intersection during both peak and non -peak hours. During non -peak hours traffic flow will be almost continuous in all directions with only occasional brief delays. There is no stopping and waiting just because the light is red. During peak hours there will be some delay in getting through the roundabout however, traffic flow will still be orderly and efficient resulting in less delay than presently exists with the signalized intersection. Results of traffic studies and capacity flow analysis of the proposed roundabout have been completed by Miami -Dade Public Works Department and are included in Appendix C. The analysis shows a Level Of Service (worst movement) of "C ". The DVD shows examples of safe and efficient flow through roundabouts for both light and heavy traffic flow. Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities The pedestrian and bicycle facilities for the roundabout can be seen on Exhibit 2. There is a striped bicycle lane on each of the streets connecting to the roundabout with a path to the sidewalk before reaching the roundabout. Sidewalks at the corners are 10 feet wide. Hence a cyclist can ride through the roundabout or transfer over to the sidewalk and use the crosswalk. There are crosswalks on all four streets with spltter islands to slow traffic and shorten the crossing distance. Crosswalks are located far enough from the circle to allow easy visibility of pedestrians. There are signs that indicate the crosswalks. When a pedestrian approaches the crosswalk he only has to look for slow traffic from one direction. The cars will stop, then the pedestrian crosses a 12 feet wide road lane to the sputter island. The pedestrian does the same to cross the other road lane. Although all vehicles should stop to allow pedestrians to cross, if only one out of five actually will stop it is still safe and easy to cross the street since the vehicle always stops or is approaching at low speed from a distance before the pedestrian crosses. My experience is that almost all cars will stop. The dynamics of how the crosswalk works is shown in the DVD. Drainage As shown on Exhibit 2, drains will be placed on both sides of each street near the roundabout. Pavement grades will be maintained so that the drains operate effectively. ..ti Lighting Streets lights will be placed to illuminate the roundabout at night. Signs_ indicating the upcoming roundabout will be placed on each street leading to the roundabout. These signs will be visible to motorists at night even when the electricity is out. in Signs on approach to the roundabout include a sign indicating that a roundabout is ahead, a`sign indicating the crosswalk as you approach the roundabout, and a yield sign. Signs when exiting the roundabout consists of a sign indicating the crosswalk. Typical signing is shown in the DVD. Landscaping The central island inside the truck apron will be landscaped in a similar manner as the San Amaro roundabout shown in the DVD, which includes an oak tree ringed with low shrubs. Guide For DVD Roads Roundabout Location: SW 9 AV and 28 Road, in Roads section of City of Miami Directions: From Douglas Road go east on Coral Way,; After Coral way bends to the left turn left on 26 Road, go to 9 AV and turn left through the roundabout, go to 27 Road to roundabout. Setting: Located in a single family neighborhood. The roundabout has moderately high traffic at both morning and evening peak hours and has low traffic during non - peak hours. Size: Inscribed Circle Diameter of 89 feet (compared with 104 feet for proposed 67 AV -64 ST roundabout), 5 feet wide truck apron Design Vehicle: Almost all of the traffic is cars and small trucks. Roundabout is designed to accommodate trucks at least as large as the garbage truck which routinely goes through here. A transit bus would fit through if the truck apron was wider. Landscaping: Small 'shrubs are planted in central island. Reason Shown on DVD: Although this roundabout is smaller and designed for a somewhat smaller design vehicle than the proposed 67 AV -64 ST roundabout, it does illustrate some aspects of roundabout function including: use of crosswalk, general circulation through the roundabout with a view that includes all legs, efficiency of vehicle circulation during moderate traffic volumes. What is shown on the DVD: 1. Pedestrian using the crosswalk 2. From a second angle, vehicles circulating through the roundabout with moderate traffic volume. Note that traffic flow is slow, efficient and orderly. There are no unnecessary delays created by a red light. 4 San Amaro Roundabout Location: San Amaro Drive just north of Miller Road Directions: From Red °Road go east on Miller Road and turn left on San Amaro and proceed to roundabout. Setting: Located between a single- family neighborhood and the University of Miami. - The roundabout has moderate to heavy traffic during peak hours and light to moderate traffic during off- -peak hours. This is similar to traffic flow at the 67 AV -64 ST intersection. Size: Inscribed Circle Diameter of 107 feet (Compared with 104 feet for proposed 67 AV -64 ST roundabout), large truck apron. Design Vehicle: Most of the traffic is cars and small trucks. Roundabout is designed to accommodate trucks as large as a semi- trailer; Landscaping: The central island has an oak tree ringed with small shrubs and grass. Reason shown on DVD: The Inscribed Circle Diameter is nearly identical to that proposed for the 67 AV -64 ST roundabout so vehicles that traffic through the San Amaro roundabout will also go through the proposed roundabout. The DVD shows the following aspects of roundabout function: signs, details of truck apron, use of crosswalk, truck traffic, traffic flow at moderate volume, traffic flow at high volume. What is shown on the DVD: 1. Signs 2. Details of central island, truck apron, circulatory road 3 Truck apron being driven on by a car as a demonstration 4. Two trucks going through roundabout 5. Pedestrian using the crosswalk 6. Semi- trailer going through roundabout 7. Slow, efficient and orderly traffic at moderate volume. Note there are no unnecessary delays caused by red lights. 8. School bus going through roundabout 9. Heavy traffic flow creating a delay at roundabout. Note that traffic flow is still efficient and orderly. Conclusion The roundabout design option should be approved for the following reasons: • The design has been recommended by Miami -Dade Public Works Department. • ' A large proportion of residents within 500 feet of the intersection have signed a petition favoring the roundabout over a three lane signalized intersection. �. 5 • The roundabout is no more physically intrusive on adjacent properties than the alternate three lane signalized design. • ' The roundabout provides benefits over the three lane signalized intersection including: safer for drivers, safer for pedestrians and bicyclists, easier traffic flow for both cars and large trucks, less delay at both peak and off - peak hours, works well even when electricity is out, more aesthetically pleasing. • Increase in delay of emergency vehicles to get through the intersection will be minimal if at all. MAIMt –DAD E COUNTY PUBLIC WORKD DI TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION' PROJECT NO. SHEET OF 672 -1-1 620-1 -1 esa 635 -1 -11 N 0-1 -109 C3 � RE01 6L ( � , 605 -320 603-321 — HOUSE ! 4 I' ! n 1I' � 1 ,1 1 1� 1 SIGNALIZATION SW 67 AVE & SW 64 ST i ! 1 E51GN I' INT.ID NO. 4163 I EXIST. MECr. CUIWT p v l CS 2/2210 HOUSE 647- 11 -4t) 620 -1 -1 (20 LF) I 847- rt1 -34 620 -1 -1 (20 IF) 53 -171a 632 -7 -1 11 ,0 ! 632 -7 -1 535 -1 -11 O ED.. 635-1 I I I — —� T. RfX.3.ER ro riE REMOVE Exist Eder of ft n o SW 67 AV PR"M ME Or PAVIMT. Al !Ir 1�1 ' A2 1. UVE'DAK m K REMVR' ----- ___ __ ___ 2, __ _ __ 0] a _- _ ti _ _ _--- __- __________- 4_____�0 - - -__. 1 _ r Exist As0% I:onc :.k - 1 V I — — — - -- — — EfY{;3 — — \ - - ---- - -- -- -- 501 �- 2 ( LP,. — _ — y Y� b -L�_— i i3L -- - - -- - - -- — -- Edge of Pa%/nt _ PB ®e -_ __ D EDGE . EDM__ _____ O -- OF PAV111'. _ __- ___ _�------- -- - - - -- — — - --- - - +. Asplu cam. 2.0- : A4 — - �,\ � i iii 1 1� % P6 A ONST. ADDITIONAL PAV'MT � :AL LIMITS OF MILLING ND RESURFACING) ; ; �'� � �;) 9 EXIST. TREE M BE TPJMMED 1647 -11 -42 _ X 847 -ii -38 620 -1 -1 (2a LF} X 11 ) { 620 -1 -s (20 LFj 632 -7 -T 1 I ■ 6 352:,7-,1, O. 835 -1-14 665 -11 �.. X �. �'.. �. I 63 665-11 E,e.t.iw.t To be Xw�trd ' i r ' HOUSE HOUSE ! 4 I' ! n 1I' � 1 ,1 1 1� 1 AIM SIGNALIZATION SW 67 AVE & SW 64 ST E51GN I' INT.ID NO. 4163 REV. DESCRIPTION Y cs CS 2/2210 AIM jC,wxHtBiT -2 So u r CCj I South Miami r` '� L►I� kill A All- AmericaQty CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI ` .. �. OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER 4 o INTER- OFFICE MEMORANDUM 2001 Too The Honorable Mayor Feliu and Members of the City Commission From :' Commissioner Jay Beckman Date: May /412006 Agenda Item No.: Subject: Miami -Dade County's Proposed Traffic Circle for the intersection of SW 64t" Street & SW 67th Avenue Resolution: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING MIAMI -DADE COUNTY'S RECOMMENDATION TO INSTALL A ROUNDABOUT AT THE INTERSECTION OF SW 64TH STREET & SW 67TH AVENUE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE Request: Accepting Miami -Dade County's recommendation to install a roundabout at the intersection of SW 64th Street '& SW 67th Avenue. Reason /Need: To provide much needed traffic calming along SW 64th Street & SW 67th Avenue corridors: Cost: No cost for design and construction of the roundabout. However, the County is asking the City to provide and maintain landscaping and irrigation in the proposed circle. Funding Source: Not Applicable. Backup. Documentation: © Proposed Resolution 0 Conceptual design of the proposed circle. �x�tl8fr -38 RESOLUTION No. 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE :CITY OF 4 SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING MIAMI -DADS COUNTY'S 5 RECOMMENDATION TO INSTALL A ROUNDABOUT AT THE INTERSECTION OF 6 SW 64TH' STREET & SW 67TH AVENUE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE 7 8 WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission wishes to provide traffic calming at the intersection 9 of SW 64th Street & SW 67th Avenue; and 10 11 WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission accepts the recommendation of the County to 12 install a roundabout at the intersection of SW 64th Street & SW 67th Avenue and 'ask the County to 13 proceed with final engineering design and construction: and 14 15 WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission authorize the City Manager to work with Miami- 16 Dade County on whatever steps it takes to accomplish the project. 17 18 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF 19 THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA THAT: 20 21 Section 1: That the City accepts the recommendation of the County to install a roundabout at 22 the intersection of SW 64th, Street & SW 67th Avenue and ask the County to "proceed with final 23 engineering design and construction: Section 2 That the Mayor and City Commission authorize the City Manager to work with 26 Miami -Dade County on whatever steps it takes to accomplish the project. 27 28 Section 3: This resolution shall take effect immediately upon approval 29 30 PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of - 2006. 31 32 ATTEST: APPROVED: 33 34 35 CITY CLERK MAYOR -_ 36 37 38 39 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM COMMISSION VOTE: 40 Mayor Feliu: 41 Vice Mayor Wiscombe: 42 Commissioner Palmer: 43 CITY ATTORNEY Commissioner$irts: 44 Commissioner Beckman: 45 46 47 48 aq 52 54 -1 -UP. .. "'S�"*' _ fir .. ..-. ., rvr ;<.,, z.- .w!a .3`S ��'^�,t ,y*T".,n"`�z^S ^R;K `'•;w',9"€?i'rv'�?Fe HIS tr--- q- Table 5.7: Turning Widths Required for Normal Roundabouts (Ourston 1995) f LEGEND a Raised central island. -_ 9 1 b Low profile mountable, apron. c Remaining circulatory roadway e width, 1.0-1.2 times the maximum entry width. �r d Design vehicle. 1 meter clearance minimum. t f Inscribed circle diameter ((CD). � d g Width between curbs. NOTE: Splitter islands should not Protrude into the inscribed circle if the roundabout is designed tightly as illustrated here, allowing only the minimum width g. Appendix A Residents Petition in Favor of Roundabout 77 r 5w f, i Summary of April 2006 Petition for Round -about at 67 AV - 64ST Intersection Residences in an approximate 500 feet radius from the intersection were surveyed. Number of residences surveyed = 68 Number of residences not responding (no one home at multiple visits) = 12 Number of residences responding = 56 Number of residences that do not prefer round -about =4 Number of residences that prefer round -about = 52 Percent of total residences surveyed that prefer round- about = 52/68 = 76% Percent of responding residences that prefer round -about = 52/56 = 93% ITIN �,�. DTI b h - � I ion qM, s `'p a ORE., M a I ion qM, ORE., M a Petition For Roun&about At 67 Avenue -64 Street Intersection April 2006 We the undersigned are in favor of installation of a round -about at the 67 Avenue - 64 Street intersection rather than a widened signalized intersection. _strt ------------ 4-.: 0-4aboa JEIL _n s -- - - - - - -- ---------------------- - - - - -: -�° -- c S-- - - - -- 62- 2— a1 1T (�� Petition For Round -about At 67 Avenue -64 Street Intersection April 2006 We the undersigned are in favor of installation of around -about at the 67 Avenue- 64 Street intersection rather than a widened signalized intersection. Nye (Print) Signature Street and Ho3xse Number -- AaA- C, 92 ---- - - - - -- ------ ----- - - - - -3 - _ s _ ,fill �Li H �4v;:�f -- -------- - - - - -- -- - - Tcft�- - - dk- - '-- - -- --= `- - - - - -- - - -- - - -==W I C- r,( _'___6_� _ _ a 1 d. l y 6 - - -` Y S.W. ._W. 6 5 _Si_4 ? �� t Petition For Round -about At 67 Avenue -64 Street Intersection April 2006 We the undersigned are in favor of installation of a round -about at the 67 Avenue - 64 Street intersection rather than a widened signalized intersection. - ---- -_ Shmature Street n H Number tL I 1�gAq /�� I CA' r-°,a x 1-015' - - `-' - - -- -- - - - - - - - - 8 I es_" f -------- - - - - -- - --- - - - - -- - - - -- " -- = - - -- -------------- -- - -- - - -- ------------------------- - - - - -- - -- - ---------- - - - - -- A__A_ ----------- ?7 -- `' ------ ---- -- --'- SC =- - -- -- ----------------- ------------ - - - - -- %> - - - -- - -- -- ------- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- - -- 6�?_ Petition For Round-about At 67 Avenue -64 Street Intersection April 2006 We the undersigned are in favor of installation of a round -about at the 67 Avenue' - 64 Street intersection rather than a widened signalized intersection. n r 3treet and House Number c E�: �i ----- _ � =_ __ _ - -- - -- - - - -- - -- - - - - - - -- -- - -- - w i - - - -- - - - -- -- - - -- - i - - - - -- - -- ----------------------- - - - - -- - - - - -- -- ---------- - - - - -- - - - -- - - - -- --- - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - -- - --------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- - - - - - -- - -- - - - - - -- -------------- - - - - -- - - - - -- ------------------------------- - - - - -- ---------------------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- ------------------- - - - - -- -------- - - - - -- - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ------------------------------------ - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- i - - - - -- - -- - - -- - -------------------- - - - - -- -------------------------------- - - - - -- - ------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------- ----------------------- - - - - -- Appendix B General Information on Roundabouts Alternate Street Design, P.A. BN Home Page 1 of 8 Alternate Street Design, 1516 Plainfield Avenue, Orange Park, Florida 32073 -3925 904 -269 -1851, Fax 904- 278 -4996, Email: mjwallwork @comcast.net. Slide Show Road Design Roundabouts ADA Perspective Resume The safest, most efficient and attractive form of traffic control in the world. A two -lane /one lane roundabout in Hilton Head South Carolina. Constructed in 1996 as a gateway into the Hilton Head Plantation as an alternative to traffic signal control. Introduction: Modern roundabouts are the prettiest and safest form of traffic control in the world. Roundabouts slow all vehicles, provide refuges for pedestrians, and are the only traffic control device in which trees can be planted, fountains can bubble or spray, statutes can sparkle into the next century. When constructed as part of new road construction they are cheaper to build than signalized intersections. If used instead of traffic signals they save us all money. Their maintenance cost is almost zero. They require no electricity, no regular tune -ups, no annual replacements of parts, suffer no blackouts and cannot be blown away. Modern roundabouts are not the old fashion traffic circles of yesteryear, those large circles about which people tell tales of getting lost, praying that they will survive to the other side each time they drive through the traffic circle. These feelings developed because drivers who entered a traffic circle http: / /www. roundabouts .net /roundabouts.html 5/16/2006 Alternate Street Design, P.A. Page 2 of 8 often could not see their exit point. Therefore, because they traveled had to travel a long distance they become "lost," or ran out of gas. In addition, the design of traffic circles was based on high- speed entry, a high -speed merge followed by a high -speed exit. The high speed maneuvers intimidated many drivers, yet they continued to drive through them. If they were so bad why did they continue to drive through them and are here to tell the stories? Roundabouts are the complete opposite of traffic circles. Roundabouts are usually designed as small as possible for their environment. When designing a roundabout the most an important criterion is design speed. Depending on the environment and the design objectives the design speed can vary from 12 mph in residential streets, 15 to 18 mph on collector streets and 18 to 23 mph on arterial roads. At high -speed rural roundabouts 25 mph is the maximum design speed that should be used. Design speeds above these levels will provide a higher crash rate. Clearwater Beach, Florida The greatest roundabout ever built in the US. It carries up to 58,000 vehicles per day and 8,000 pedestrians per day. There are two basic premises on which roundabouts achieve crash reductions of 50 to 90 percent when compared to two and four -way stop control and signalized intersections and greatly reduced severity on those few crashes that do occur. One is the simple decision making combined with the low level of conflicts. At a four -way intersection there are 32 possible conflict points between vehicles and only eight at roundabouts. Pedestrians face six conflicts when crossing only one leg of the road whereas at a roundabout they only have two. See figures below http: / /www. roundabouts .net /roundabouts.html 5/16/2006 Alternate Street Design, P.A. Page 3 of 8 First Traffic calming roundabout on a State Highway, close to a school and carries 800 pedestrians, including 560 children per day. The first roundabout on a State Highway in the US was in Montpelier, VT. It opened 5.8 years ago. The crash rate before the roundabout was approximately 5.5 crashes per year. The after crash rate, shows no reported crashes. At the large two lane roundabout in Clearwater beach many minor property crashes have occurred most of which would never be reported because they would be under the dollar limit. Most of these crashes were caused by incorrect education and a failure to yield at one point, and only one point, on a six - legged roundabout. Prior to the roundabout there were approximately 35 reported crashes per year. Many of them were injury crashes. There have been no pedestrian bicycle crashes in the first year despite an average of 4 a year prior to the roundabout. A two -lane /one lane roundabout in South Carolina carries approximately 2,500 vehicles per hour. In the 36 months before the roundabout there were 48 crashes with 15 injury crashes. In the 48 months afterwards there were 9 minor property damage only crashes. These crashes were mainly the http: / /www.roundabouts .net /roundabouts.html 5/16/2006 Alternate Street Design, P.A. Page 4 of 8 lane change crashes that occur when drivers illegally change lanes. Secondly, the low speed means that if a driver makes a mistake it is easy to stop at a low speed or at least the impact is relatively minor. Whereas signalized intersections have high -speed right angle and left turn crashes, and many others, crashes at roundabouts are primarily rear end or low speed merge crashes. It is very, very hard to be killed at a roundabout whereas a driver running a red light can easily kill themselves and others. Consider this comparison. In 1999 according to the FHWA drivers who ran red signals caused 85,000 crashes, in which 81,000 people were injured and worse still 1,000 people were killed. A roundabout consists of a central island that can vary in shape from a "square -a- bout" in Victorian areas, ovals and elipses at odd shaped intersections to the ordinary circle. Each leg of a roundabout has a splitter island, a triangular shaped island, that provides a refuge for pedestrians, prevents drivers from making the "wrong -way" left turn, guides drivers through the roundabout by directing them to the edge of the central island and helps to slow drivers. Local street roundabouts are quite small. The central island starts at about 15 feet in diameter. Collector road roundabouts start with around a central island diameter of 30 to 40 feet. Roundabouts on arterial roads start with a minimum central island diameter of 64 feet for a single lane roundabout. Even large roundabouts at freeway interchanges or major intersections have central island diameters that are only 120 to 180 feet. Fort Pierce, Florida A collector road roundabout used to calm traffic, provide a safe pedestrian environment and to improve the aesthetics. ll Modern roundabouts can be used at a wide variety of intersections - Freeway interchanges, Tee intersections, four -way or "Y" type intersections. Multi -leg intersections up to eight roads are an http: / /www. roundabouts .net /roundabouts.html 5/16/2006 Alternate Street Design, P.A. Page 5 of 8 especially effective location for roundabouts. Any intersection with more than four legs will operate safer and far more efficiently than the same intersection with traffic signals. Trains or light rail vehicles can travel through the middle of a roundabout. When trains pass through a roundabout only two boom gates are required to stop the traffic. Both gates are placed next to the train tracks to stop the circulating traffic. When the trains come the boom gates stop the traffic, then, depending on the courtesy of drivers, the roundabout may be blocked. When the boom gates open it only takes less than 'a minute or so to clear the traffic. When Light Rail Vehicles pass through the center of a roundabout they do so without any assistance whatsoever and they have absolute right -of -way. Do vehicles run into these larger vehicles? No. It is hard to run into an 80 foot long LRV at 20 mph. A traffic calming Roundabout in two residential streets. Note the boy on the skateboard is traveling the same speed as the car. Modern roundabouts also simplify Access Management in two ways. By replacing Center Turn Lanes with a raised median some drivers must pass their destination and make a U -turn to access their destination. Roundabouts make U -turns very safe and provide an opportunity to sell medians to business owners. The other benefit is at an intersection where a roundabout is constructed and there are driveways to private houses or commercial properties that are at, or close to, the intersection. Rather than buy, them out, or pay a compensation for moving their driveway, provide a driveway into the roundabout. There are a few caveats. Firstly every vehicle must drive into the roundabout, no reversing is permitted. In the case of a private house a turn around may be needed in their front yard. Secondly, there must be separation between the entry and exit points to the roundabout and the driveway. There is a two lane roundabout in Spartanburg, SC, that has four roads, two frontage roads, an on and off ramp, and five driveways accessing the roundabout. The driveways are to a bank, a gas station, two restaurants and a fast food restaurant. http: / /www. roundabouts .net /roundabouts.html 5/16/2006 Alternate Street Design, P.A. Page 6 of 8 Modern roundabouts are the most effective traffic calming treatments available. They limit vehicle speeds to approximately 15 mph and control vehicle speeds on four streets simultaneously. Gateways to communities and main streets are an effective location for roundabouts as they slow traffic and provide space for a grand entrance treatment. Roundabouts can act as a town square with fountains or other features to create a focal point, a place to be. In addition to the beauty they can provide if landscaped well, roundabouts in these circumstances slow traffic, assist pedestrians to cross the street. This roundabout shows a well- designed sidewalk and bicycle facilities. Also included to the right a bicycle roundabout to control the speeds of bicycles as they leave the roundabout. Yet there is resistance to roundabouts based often on poor experiences with old traffic circles, a reluctance to try something new, to change, or a fear that at they will not work in America. However they are a rapidly growing awareness that roundabouts will solve many traffic problems, enhance cities etc. that they have now been constructed in more than 40 states, ten Departments of Transportation. Each roundabout has been an outstanding success. Americans have shown that their adaptability and competence have exceeded that of the detractors. Whether the roundabouts are constructed at freeway interchanges, at high speed rural intersections, with light rail running through the middle, next to schools, within senior communities, to calm traffic, everyone that was properly designed has exceeded expectations. Several badly designed roundabouts have been removed and several have been modified. Unfortunately, many old traffic signals have been cut up unnecessarily by roads being cut through their center and traffic signals installed. As a result, the aesthetics of the circles suffered when, in many cases, converting them to modern roundabouts by changing their entry conditions could have http: / /www.roundabouts .net /roundabouts.html 5/16/2006 Alternate Street Design, P.A. Page 7 of 8 reduced crashes, improved capacity, and retained the aesthetic valve of the circle. Aesthetics Roundabouts are the only form of traffic control whose design is as much an art form as it is science. Their design involves an interaction between design speed templates, curves that provide drivers with a smooth path and pleasing appearance. The splitter islands (triangular islands on each approach) must be large enough to provide safe refuge for pedestrians back from the entry point. Instead of using plain concrete for the center and splitter islands, we need to use a mix of pavers and low shrubbery or grass, with trees, fountains, or statues in the center island to give a unified look from right -of -way line to right -of -way line. Therefore, landscape architects and engineers should work together to give communities traffic control that is safe and effective and meets their needs while enhancing the intersection and larger surrounding area or a town center. Modern roundabouts work by making drivers move to their right as they enter the roundabout, go left as they pass around the center island, and then go right as they exit. The degree of curvature through the roundabout is what governs the vehicle speed. The tighter the curves the lower the speed. Approach view as drivers enter the roundabout from the mainland. Vn Light rail vehicles in a roundabout in Melbourne,Australia http: / /www. roundabouts .net /roundabouts.html 5/16/2006 Alternate Street Design, P.A. Bradenton Beach, Florida Page 8 of 8 All three restaurants were so outclassed by the new highway design that the owners reconditioned their buildings, starting a downtown rejuvenation effort. Summary Modern roundabouts are the safest and prettiest form of traffic control in the world that can also achieve many other communities objectives such as traffic calming, cost savings, act as gateways and town centers. All in all they are the most versatile and fastest growing form of traffic control in this country. http: / /www. roundabouts .net /roundabouts.html 5/16/2006 Appendix C Traffic Flow Analysis of Proposed Roundabout Intersection Summary Page 1 of 1 2 Ontersection Summary & "Sociates `rfc SIDRA SW 67 Avenue & SW 64 Street Performance Measure Vehicles Persons Demand Flow 1983 veh /h 2380 pers /h Degree of Saturation 0.884 Capacity (Total) 4143;veh /h 95% Back of Queue (ft) 482 ft 95% Back of Queue (veh) - 19.0 veh Control, Delay (Total) 8.50 veh -h /h 10.21 pers -h /h Control Delay (Average) 15.4 s /veh ' 15.4 s /pers Level of Service LOS B'; Level of Service (Worst Movement) LOS C' Total Effective Stops` 1789 veh /h 2147 pers /h Effective Stop Rate 0.90 per veh 0.90 per pers Travel Distance (Total) 812.4 veh -mi /h 974,9 pers -mi /h Travel Distance (Average) 2163 ft 2163 ft Travel Time (Total)' 29.5 veh -h /h 35.4 pees -h /h Travel Time (Average) 53.6 secs 53.6 secs Travel Speed 27.5 mph 27.5 mph Operating Cost (Total) - 378 $/h 378 $/h ,e` "�• -,I Consumption (Total) 40.1 ga /h .. ,, 'bon Dioxide (Total) 379.4 kg /h Hydrocarbons (Total) -0.626 kg /h Carbon Monoxide (Total) 28.30 kg /h NOX (Total) 0.896 kg /h_, C: \Documents and Settings \]CPE \My Documents \Roundabouts \SW 67 Ave & SW 64 St Produced by aaSIDRA 2.0.3.217 Copyright© 2000 -2002 Akcelik & Associates 'Pty Ltd Generated' 5/4/2006 7:41 :52 PM MAI EN NS RUCT Of+1 r'O file:HC \Documents and Settings \JCPE \Local Settings \Temp\ 1622AF.HTM Movement Summary Page 1 of l C: \Documents and Settings \9CPE \My Documents \Roundabouts \SW 67 Ave & SW 64 St Produced by aaSIDRA 2.0.3.217 Copyright© 2000 -2002 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd Generated 5/4/20067:42:59 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings \JCPE \Local Settings \Temp\ 17253B.HTM 5/4/2006 �I'lovement Summary associatos aaTraffic SIDRA SW 67 Avenue & SW 64 Street Roundabout Vehicle Movements Mov No Turn Dem flow Cap Deg of Satn Aver Delay Level of 95% Back of Eff. Stop Aver Speed Oper Cost (veh /h) (veh /h) (v /c) (sec) Service Queue Rate ' (mi /h) ($ /h) , (ft) South Approach 32 L 4 1585 0.278 5.3 LOS A 56 0.44 33.7 73 32 T 393 1585 0.278 5.3 LOS A 56 0.44 33.7 73 32 R 42 1585 0.278 5.3 LOS A 56 0.44 33.7 73 Approach 441 1585 0.278 5.3 LOS A 56 0.44 33.7 73 East Approach 22 L 100 1109 0.673 10.2 LOS B 225 0.77 30.7 123 22 T 545 1109 0.673 10.2 LOS B 225 0.77 30.7 123 22 R 101 1109 0.673 10.2 LOS B 225 0.77 30.7 123 C�+proach 1 r , 746 1109 0.673 10.2 LOS B 225 0.77 30.7 123 North Approach 42 L 63 770 0.884 28.9 LOS C 482 1.39 22.6 159 42 T 537 770 0.884 28.9 ' LOS C 482 1.39 22.6 159 42 R 80 770 0.884 28.9 LOS C 482 1.39 22.6 159 Approach 681 770 0.884 28.9 LOS C 482 1.39 22.6 159 ,West Approach 12 L 14 680 0.169 8.5 LOS `A 29 0.66 26.5 23 12 T 82 680 0.169 8.5 LOS A 29 0.66 26.5 23 12 R 16 680 0.169 8.5 LOS A 29 0.66 26.5 23 Approach 115 680 0.169 8.5 LOS A - 29 0.66 26.5 23 All Vehicles 1983 4143 0.884 15.4 LOS B 482 0.90 27.5 378 C: \Documents and Settings \9CPE \My Documents \Roundabouts \SW 67 Ave & SW 64 St Produced by aaSIDRA 2.0.3.217 Copyright© 2000 -2002 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd Generated 5/4/20067:42:59 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings \JCPE \Local Settings \Temp\ 17253B.HTM 5/4/2006 Intersection Type 114ff f6- W Roundabout I ONA C: \Documents and Settings \7CPE \My Documents\ Rou ndabouts\SW 67 Ave & SW 64 St Produced by aeSIDRA 2.0.3.217 Copyright© 2000 -2002 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd Generated 5/4/2006 7:43:59 PM fileWCADocuments'and Settings \XPETocal'Settings \Temp\ 181279.HTM 5/4/2006 ..,�e -^" ..-°„ �r,:m• .�m�.:�-�-kpw, .,- .:..,r ..- . -: -. ,.�s: ;*.,:y -„ -€. ..,w �'�;vv+.�"2"' �' .,' �s "�...'"'.��e', ^�zr^ay,?.'� -'�. m Vic:*= .G= z;;�:`� � ,a€:-- �-`*,.*-�°r.. -�3 , ,�a,.� 4 ,: } L ' 1. E .` ONA C: \Documents and Settings \7CPE \My Documents\ Rou ndabouts\SW 67 Ave & SW 64 St Produced by aeSIDRA 2.0.3.217 Copyright© 2000 -2002 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd Generated 5/4/2006 7:43:59 PM fileWCADocuments'and Settings \XPETocal'Settings \Temp\ 181279.HTM 5/4/2006 ..,�e -^" ..-°„ �r,:m• .�m�.:�-�-kpw, .,- .:..,r ..- . -: -. ,.�s: ;*.,:y -„ -€. ..,w �'�;vv+.�"2"' �' .,' �s "�...'"'.��e', ^�zr^ay,?.'� -'�. m Vic:*= .G= z;;�:`� � ,a€:-- �-`*,.*-�°r.. -�3 , ,�a,.� 4 cfrldelavav Page l of l z (5ontrol Delay (Average) nne.111C asTraffic SIB Average control delay per vehicle (seconds) SW 67 Avenue &! SW 64 Street Intersection Type '14,01h. A, Mbal hi Roundabout E 3. E Mi SO E i IP -�a1 C: \Documents and Settings \]CPE \My Documents \Roundabouts \SW 67 Ave & SW 64 St Produced by aaSIDRA 2.0.3.217 Copyright© 2000 -2002 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd Generated 5 /4/2006 7 :44:42 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings \JCPE \Local Settings \Temp\ 18B735.HTM 5/4/2006 geodelayav Page 1 of ] eometric Delay aaTraffic SIDRA Average geometric delay per vehicle (seconds) SW 67 Avenue & SW 64 Street Intersection Type` 114 �f1i Roundabout E M1 f { C: \Documents °and Settings \JCPE \My Documents \Roundabouts \SW 67 Ave & SW 64 St Produced by aaSIDRA 2.0.3.217 Copyright@ 2000 -2002 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd Generated 5/4/2006 7 :45:07 PM Intersection Type NO Ap i ± Roundabout UM' �I M i !4 C: \Documents and Settings \7CPE \My Documents \Roundabouts \SW 67 Ave & SW 64 St Produced by aaSIDRA 2.0.3.217 Copyright© 2000 -2002 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd Generated 5/4/2006 7:45:17 PM file:HCADocuments and Settings \JCPE\Loca1 Settings \Temp\ 1942BC.HTM 5/4/2006 aceflow. Page 1 of l 2 (: - ,pproach, Circulating and Exiting e" ns. -ates Flows carafe SIDRA Approach, circulating and exiting flow rates as used by the program (veh /h) SW '67 Avenue & SW 64 Street Intersection Type i�k(3ri� Roundabout ks� M1 i i 8 to 106411 440" 3 C: \Documents and Settings \9CPE \My Documents \Roundabouts \SW 67 Ave & SW 64 St Produced by aaSIDRA;,2.0.3.217 Copyright© 2000 -2002 Akcetik & Associates Pty Ltd Generated 5/4/2006 7 :45 :28 PM fileWC \Documents'and Settings \JCPE \Local Settings \Temp\ 196D27.HTM 5/4/2006 Intersection Type F�EMA Roundabout J. j ,�. ice: ,fii'1i j � � ,_? � +Ml i qft j€ C: \Documents and Settings \7CPE \My Documents\ Rou ndabouts\SW 67 Ave & SW 64 St Produced by aaSIDRA:2.0.3.217 Copyright© 2000 -2002 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd Generated 5 /4/2006 7:45:56 PM file://CADocuments and Settings \XPETocal Settings \Temp\ 19DA58.HTM 5/4/2006 ., ,r�€-., ,.�, . F� '+r��i`r.�e =x��".`�s'r?�T°'.�� sr,, ^" ..-,,.ate,. ,`�"='F`°i`° n' fir :�.n— °=�-cr_�'•.cv�+"""^�.,'n =s userflovv Page 1 of 1 cwnput Volumes akell W Wes Total flow rates as given by the user (veh /60 min) SW 67 Avenue & SW 64 Street Intersection Type Roundabout if {5Si t 5 1 Ala ALL Imo. Mj MAP-M.110 11 f , C: \Documents and Settings \JCPE \My Documents\ Roundabouts \SW 67 Ave & SW 64 St Produced by aaSIDRA 2.0.3.217 Copyright© 2000 -2002 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd Generated 5 /4/2006 7:46:08 PM file://C:\Documents and SettingsWPETocal Settings \Temp\ 1A08BB.HTM 5/4/2006 Intersection Type _FF Roundabout Ml ...... . ... . ...... J8, :0 :� ft 3 r 0 C: \Documents and Settings \JCPE \My Documents \Roundabouts \SW 67 Ave & SW 64 St Produced by aaSIDRA 2.0.3.217 Copyright© 2000 -2002 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd Generated 5/4/2006 7 :46:19 PM I file://CADocuments and Settings \JCPE \Local Settings \Temp\ 1A31CF.HTM 5/4/2006 Intersection Type rNOM A, '1 #0-t 'i! Roundabout E € F E 01 Ml —XI E T IT 3# i C: \Documents and Settings \7CPE \My Documents\ Rou ndabouts\SW 67 Ave & SW 64 St Produced by aaSIDRA 2.0.3.217 Copyright© 2000 -2002 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd Generated 5/4/2006 7:46:38 PM fileWCADocuments and SettingsWPE \Local Settings \Temp\ lA7EC6.HTM `_ 5/4/2006 r .. Intersection Type p€ Roundabout r 0 ml p--------- -- X # :z" `3 r ; ry i C: \Documents and Settings \)CPE \My Documents \Roundabouts \SW 67 Ave & SW 64 St Produced by aaSIDRA 2.0.3.217 Copyright© 2000 -2002 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd Generated 5/4/2006 7:47:13 PM fileWCADocuments and Settings \JCPE \Local Settings \Temp\ 1B0646.HTM 5/4/2006 queueveh Pagel of] z u e u ee� alaTraffic SR Largest 95% Back of Queue for any lane used by movement (vehicles) SW 67 Avenue & SW 64 Street Intersection Type 4 ahA0 Roundabout AOL i mm I f i C: \Documents and Settings \]CPE \My Documents \Roundabouts \SW 67 Ave & SW 64 St Produced by aaSIDRA 2.0.3.217 Copyright© 2000 - 2002 Akcelik`& Associates Pty Ltd Generated 5/4/2006 7:47:29 PM file: / /CADocuments and SetringsWPE\Local Settings \Temp\ 1B46F8.HTM 5/4/2006 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd - aaSIDRA 2.0.3.217 Miami -Dade Public Works Department Traffic Engineering Registered User No. A1140 � Licence Type': Professional, Multi Computer Time and Date of Analysis 3 :43 PM, Aug 15,2005 Filename C: \Documents and Settings \JCPE \My Documents \Roundabouts \SW 67 Ave `& SW 64 St.OUT SW 67 Avenue & SW 64 Street Roundabout Study PM Peak Intersection ID: l aaTraffic SIDRA US Highway Capacity Manual (2000) Version RUN INFORMATION * Basic Parameters: Intersection Type: Roundabout Driving on the right -hand side of the road Input data specified in US units Default Values File No. 11 Peak flow period (for performance): 15 minutes Unit :time `(for volumes): 60 minutes (Total Flow Period) Delay definition: Control delay Geometric delay included HCM Delay and Queue: Models opt -ion selected Level of Service based on: Delay (HCM method) Queue definition: Back of queue, 95th Percentile 67 Avenue & SW 64 Street undabout'Study PM Peak 'Intersection ID: 1 DEFAULT PARAMETERS Default values for some of the important general parameters: (Default Values File: DEFII.SDF) 1. Basic saturation flow: 1900 tcu /h This value applies mainly to signalised intersections. For roundabouts and sign - controlled intersections, it is used for determining capacity of priority and continuous movements. 2. Through car equivalents for signalised intersections L E F- T THROUGH R' I G H T IV HV LV HV IV HV Normal 1.053 2.000 1.000 2.000 1.176 2.000 Restricted 1.303 2.500 1.426 2.500 3 Opposed turn parameters (Roundabout) Crit. Fol.up Min. o Exit Flow Gap Hdway Deps Opposing Left turns V V 2.5 0_ Through V V 2.5 0 Right turns: V V 2.5 0 4 Cruise speed= 40 mi /h, Approach Distance= 1800 ft 5. Queue space per vehicle in feet Light vehicles: 25.0 Heavy vehicles: 45.0 A full list of input data defaults and ranges is given in the Flow Headway Vehicles (s) Headway (pcu /h) (s) (s) West: West Approach Left 1 Dominant 700 2.00 0.622 4.50 2.28 u 1 Dominant 700 2.00 0.622 4.50 2.28 ht 1 Dominant 700 2.00 0.622 4.50 2.28 South: South Approach Left 1 Dominant 159 2.00 0.199 4.13 1.92 Thru . 1 Dominant 159 2.00 0.199 4.13 1.92` Right 1 Dominant 159 2.00 0.199 4.13; 1.92 East: East Approach Left 1 Dominant 412 2.00 0.436 4.45 2.15 Thru 1 Dominant 412 2.00 0.436 4.45 2.15 Right 1 Dominant 412 2.00 0.436 4.45 2.15 North: North Approach Left 1 Dominant 649 2.00 0.594 4.45 2.23 Thru 1 Dominant 649 2.00 0.594 4.45 2.23 Right 1 Dominant 649 2.00 0.594 4.45 2;23 SW 67 Avenue & SW 64 Street Roundabout Study PM Peak Intersection ID: 1 Roundabout Table R.5 - ROUNDABOUT CAPACITY & LEVEL OF SERVICE - aaSIDRA & HCM MODELS, CK k aaSIDRA- - -- HCM -2000- Lower - -- _- -HCM- 2000 - Upper -- V Dem - - - -- No. Flow Cap. Deg. Av. Cap. Deg. Av. Cap. Deg. Av. (veh (veh Satn Delay LOS (veh -Satn Delay LOS (veh .Satn_Delay LOS /h) /h) x (sec) /h) x (sec) /h) x (sec) West: West Approach 12'LTR 115 680 0.169 8.5 A 640 0.180 8.6 A 792 0.145 8.0 A 680 0.169 8.5 A' 640 0.180 8.6 A 792 0.145 8.0 A South: South Approach 32 LTR 441 1585 0.278 5.3 A 1014 0.435 5.7 A 1220 0.361 5.4 A 1585 0.278 5.3 A 1014 0.435 5. -7 A 1220 0.361 5.4 A East: East Approach 22'LTR 746 1109 0.673 10.2' B 815 0.915 21.4 C 1001 0.745 - 11.4 B 1109 0.673 10.2 B 815 0.915 21.4 C 1001 0.745 11.4 B North:' North Approach 42'LTR 681 770 0.884 28:9 C 661 1.030 55.1 E 828 - 0.822 21.1 C 770 0.884 28.9 C 661 1.030 55.1 E 828 0.822 21.1' C ALL VEHICLES: 4144 0.884 15.4 -B 3130 1,030 28.7 C 3841 0.822 13.2 B L y�67 Avenue & SW -64 Street Roundabout Study PM Peak' Intersection ID: l Roundabout Table R.6 - ROUNDABOUT ALTERNATIVE CAPACITY MODELS _Largest back of queue, 950 (ft) = 482 Performance' Index = 49.96 Degree of saturation (highest) _ 0.854 Practical Spare Capacity (lowest) _ -4 Total vehicle capacity, all lanes (veh /h) _ 4143 vehicle flow (veh /h) = 1983 C lTotal ,,'Total person flow (pers /h) = 2380 Total vehicle delay (veh -h /h) _ 8.50 Total person delay (pers -h /h) _ 10.21 Total effective vehicle stops (veh /h) 1789 Total effective person stops,'(pers /h) _ 2147_ Total vehicle travel (veh -mi /h) = 812.4 Total cost ($ /h)' _ 377.67 Total fuel (ga /h) = 40.1 Total CO2 (kg /h) _ 379.41 SW 67 Avenue ,& SW 64 Street Roundabout Study PM Peak Intersection ID: 1 SW 67 Avenue & SW 64 Street Roundabout Study PM Peak Intersection ID: 1 Roundabout Table S.6 INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE - - - -- ------ - -' - -- --------- - - - - -- - ------ - - - - -- Total Deg. Total Total- Aver. Prop. Eff. Longest Perf. Aver. Flow Satn Delay Delay Delay Queued Stop Queue Index Speed (veh /h) x (veh -h /h)(pers- h /h)(sec) Rate (ft) (mph) West: West Approach 115 0.169 0.27 0.33 8.5 0.702 0.66 29 2.67 26.5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- South: South Approach 441 0.278 0.65 0.78 5.3 0.339 0.44 56 7.03 33.7 -------------------------- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- _-- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- East: East Approach 46 0.673 2.11 2.53 10.2 0.756' 0.77 225 15.68 30.7 ---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- North: North Approach 681 0.884 5.47 6.56 28.9 0.939 1.39 482 24.58 22.6 INTERSECTION (persons): 2380 0.884 10.21 15.4 0.723 0.90 49.96 27.5 .. ,. , � . "'- ,;,- .- •- , ---�.; ..- .:,�^ -.., ,:.� -,�.� < , , ,.,_. . , , .��r�;°- �*? °:s...a , . .. �,, .... ,c c. =s1 -, 7 , �a,� �� �.�r,, ^F°�}^..sa e,,:rrsmr, ;- , +�c�, ,�' Roundabout Table S.5 - MOVEMENT PERFORMANCE Mov Total Total Aver. Prop. Eff. Longest Queue Perf. Aver. No. Delay Delay Delay Queued Stop ' 95% Back Index Speed, - (veh -h /h)(pers- h /h)(sec) Rate (vehs) (ft) (mph) West: West Approach 12 LTR 0 -.27 0.33 8.5 0.70 0.66 1 -.1 29 2.67 26.5 South: South Approach 71�32 ------------------------ LTR 0.65 0.78 5.3 ------------------------=--------=----------- 0.33 0.44 2.2 56 7.03 33.7 - st: East Approach 22 LTR 2.11 2.53 10.2 0.75 0.77 8.9 225 15.68 30.7 North: North Approach 42 LTR 5.47 6.56 28.9 0.93 1.39 19.0 482 24.58 22.6 SW 67 Avenue & SW 64 Street Roundabout Study PM Peak Intersection ID: 1 Roundabout Table S.6 INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE - - - -- ------ - -' - -- --------- - - - - -- - ------ - - - - -- Total Deg. Total Total- Aver. Prop. Eff. Longest Perf. Aver. Flow Satn Delay Delay Delay Queued Stop Queue Index Speed (veh /h) x (veh -h /h)(pers- h /h)(sec) Rate (ft) (mph) West: West Approach 115 0.169 0.27 0.33 8.5 0.702 0.66 29 2.67 26.5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- South: South Approach 441 0.278 0.65 0.78 5.3 0.339 0.44 56 7.03 33.7 -------------------------- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- _-- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- East: East Approach 46 0.673 2.11 2.53 10.2 0.756' 0.77 225 15.68 30.7 ---------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- North: North Approach 681 0.884 5.47 6.56 28.9 0.939 1.39 482 24.58 22.6 INTERSECTION (persons): 2380 0.884 10.21 15.4 0.723 0.90 49.96 27.5 .. ,. , � . "'- ,;,- .- •- , ---�.; ..- .:,�^ -.., ,:.� -,�.� < , , ,.,_. . , , .��r�;°- �*? °:s...a , . .. �,, .... ,c c. =s1 -, 7 , �a,� �� �.�r,, ^F°�}^..sa e,,:rrsmr, ;- , +�c�, ,�' No. Typ Flow Cap. Util Satn Delay Stop Back of Index (veh (veh Rate Queue /h) /h) (o) x (sec) (veh) West: West Approach '12 -LTR 115 680 100 0.169 8.5 0.66 1.1 2.67 ---------------------------------------------------------------- South: South Approach 32 LTR 441 1585 100 0.278 5.3 0.44 2.2 7.03 East: _,East Approach 22 LTR 746 1109 100 0.673 10.2 0.77 8.9 15.68 North North Approach 42 LTR 681 770 100 0.884* 28.9 1.39 19.0 24.58 * Maximum degree of saturation SW 67 Avenue & SW 64 Street Roundabout Study PM Peak Intersection ID: l Roundabout -Table S.12A - FUEL CONSUMPTION, EMISSIONS AND COST - TOTAL' Mov Fuel Cost HC CO NOX CO2 No. Total Total Total Total Total Total gal /h $/h kg /h kg /h kg /h kg /h West: West Approach 12 LTR 2.5 23.26 0.038 1.89 0.054 23.4 }----------------------------------------------- 2.5 23.26 0.03.8 1.89 0.054 23.4 South: South 'Approach 32 LTR 8.3 72.65 0.123 5.53 0.188 78.6 8.3 72.65 0.123 5.53 0.188 78.6 East: East Approach 22 LTR 13.0 122.67 0.200 8.46 0.283 123.3 13.0 122.67 0.200 8.46 0.283 123,3 North: North Approach 42 LTR 16.3 159.09 0.265 12.42 0.372 154.1 16.3 159.09 0.265 12.42 0.372 154.1 INTERSECTION: 40.1 377.67 0.626 28.30 0.896 379.4 PARAMETERS USED IN COST CALCULATIONS Pump price of fuel ($ /US gal) 1.600 Fuel resource cost _factor - 0.70 Ratio of running cost to fuel cost = 3.0 ��-,',Average income ($ /h) = 17.00 ,Time value factor = 0.40 Average occupancy (persons /veh) = 1.2 Light vehicle mass (1000 lb) = 3.1 Heavy vehicle mass (1000' lb)' = 24.0 Light vehicle idle fuel rate (US gal /h) = 0.360 Heavy vehicle idle fuel 'rate (US gal /h) = 0.530 . ,.� - f� 62 538 81 681 2 0.884 28.9 482 ALL VEHICLES Total Max Aver. Max Flow HV X Delay Queue 1983 2 0.884 15.4 482 kw Lal flow period 60 minutes. Peak flow period = 15 minutes. Queue values in this table are 95% back of queue (feet). Note: Basic Saturation Flows are not adjusted at roundabouts or sign- controlled intersections and apply only to continuous lanes. SW 67 Avenue & SW 64 Street Roundabout Study PM Peak Intersection ID: 1 Roundabout Table S.15 CAPACITY AND LEVEL OF _SERVICE Mov Mov Total Total Deg.' Aver. LOS No. Typ Flow Cap. of Delay (veh (veh Satn /h) /h) (v /c) (sec) West: West Approach 12 LTR 115 680 0.169 8.5 A 115 680 0.169 8.5 A South: South Approach 32 LTR 441 1585 0.278 5.3 A ------------------------------------ 441 1585 0.278 5.3 A East: East Approach 22 LTR 746 1109 0.673 10`.2 B 746 1109 0.673 10.2 B North: North Approach 42 LTR 681 770 0.884* 28.9 C 681 770 0.884 28.9, C ALL VEHICLES: 1983 4143 0.884 15.4 B Level of Service calculations are based on average control delay including geometric delay (HCM criteria), independent of the current delay definition used. For the Criteria, refer to the "Level of Service" topic in the aaSIDRA Output Guide or the Output section of the on -line help. * Maximum v/c ratio, or critical green periods SW 67 Avenue & SW 64 Street Roundabout Study PM Peak Intersection ID: 1 Roundabout ie D.0 GEOMETRIC DELAY DATA Negn Negn Negn Appr. Downstream From To Radius Speed Dist. Dist. Distance Approach Approach (ft); (mph) (ft) (ft) (ft) West: West Approach South: South Approach ,1_ LTR 0.278 0.18 0.00 0.26 0.44 0.339 0.00 East: East Approach' 1 LTR 0.673 0.61 0.07 0.09 0.77 0.756 0.15 ------- - - -- girth: North Approach �s1 LTR 0.884 0.88 0.48 0.03 1.39 0.939 1.13 hg is the average value for all movements in a shared lane hqm is average queue move -up rate for all vehicles queued and unqueued SW 67 Avenue &'SW 64 Street Roundabout Study PM Peak Intersection ID: 1 Roundabout Table D.3 - LANE QUEUES Deg. Ovrfl._ Average (veh) Percentile (veh) Queue Lane Satn Queue ----------- - - - - -- ----------------------- - - - - -- Stor. No. x No Nbl Nb2 Nb 70% 85% 900 95% 98% Ratio West: West Approach 1 LTR 0.169 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.3 0.02 South: South Approach 1 LTR 0.278 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.7 1.3 1.6 1.8 2.2 2.5 0.03 East: East Approach LTR 0.673 0.4 2.3 0.7 3.0 5.0 6.2 7.1 8.9 10.3 0.13 orth: North Approach 1 LTR 0.884 2.9 2.8 3.9 6.8 10.2 12.9 14.9 19.0 22.3 0.27 Values printed in this table are back of queue (vehicles). SW 67 Avenue &'SW 64 Street Roundabout Study; PM Peak Intersection ID: 1 Roundabout Table D.4 MOVEMENT SPEEDS (mph) Queue Move -up App. Speeds Exit, Speeds -- - - -- - Av. Section Spd Mov ----- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- 1st 2nd --------------- No. Cruise Negn Negn Cruise Grn Grn Running overall West: West Approach 12 30.0 25.4 25.4 40.0 26.6 26.5 South: South Approach 32 40.0 27.0 27.0 39.9 33.7 33.7 East: East Approach 22 40.0 25.4 - -- 25.4 - -32.7- 16.5 30.9 30.7 ---------- - - - - -- -------------------------------- North: North Approach 42 40.0- 25.9 25.9 38.8 14.1 26.1, 22.6 "Running Speed" is the average speed excluding stopped periods. End of aaSIDRA Output - -- i 0u11t ONalf1'S . �'i �C Number of Location Round- City, State School Level abouts '0 S'` Years in Service Constructing Authority 1 Clearwater, FL Middle 1 .4 City of Clearwater 2 Montelier, NJ Elementary 1 7 City 3 Village of Howard, WI Elementary school, middle school & high school 2 2 -3 Village 4 Sonoma County, CA High school 1 3 Count 5 Lake Worth, FL High school 1 2 Florida DOT 6 University Place, WA Middle school & high school. Elementary school nearby 2 4 City 7 DePere, WI Elementary school high school 3 ? School board 8 Davis, CA University 9 9 University 9 Grand Rapids., Ml University 3 Years. University 10 Jackson, MS Middle school & university 5 Under construction City 11 Corey, Long Island, New York Middle school & high school 1 0.3 School Board 12 Brainbridge, WA Elementary school 1 1 City 13 Greenville, SC Private 1 4 School Board 14 Newton, MA Elementary school 2 2 School Board / City 15 Honolulu, Hl Elementuy school 2 3 City 16 Davis, CA Elementary school 1 Several City 17 Needham, MA Elementary school 2 Several City 18 Jackson, Michigan Middle school 1 19 Charlotte, NC 1 20 Green Bay, WI 1 21 Nashua, NH 1 22 Manoa, HI Y2 block from an elementary school 1 23 Lawrence, Kansas An elementary , school and a junior high 1 24 Walnut Creek By the Northgate High School 1 City of Walnut Creek 25 Kennewick, WA Elementary School 1 0.5 City of Kennewick 26 Rochester Hills, MI Middle School & High School 1 1 3 Joint City / Road Commission for Oakland County Total 47 Copy of RSCH.xls - Poster version Compiled by Ken Sides, PE Printed 5/16/2006 2;21 PM -I Intersection Summary Page 1 of l 2 Intersection Summary associates aaTr ffic SIDRA SW 67 Avenue & SW 64 Street Performance Measure Vehicles Persons Demand Flow 1983 veh /h 2380 pers /h Degree of Saturation 0.884 Capacity (Total) 4143 veh /h 95% Back of Queue (ft) 482 ft 95% Back of Queue (veh) 19.0 veh Control Delay (Total) 8.50 veh -h /h 10.21 pers -h /h Control Delay (Average) 15.4 s /veh 15.4 s /pers Level of Service LOS B Level of Service (Worst Movement) LOS C Total Effective Stops 1789 veh /h 2147 pers /h Effective Stop Rate 0.90 per veh 0.90 per pers Travel Distance (Total) 812.4 veh -mi /h 974.9 pers -mi /h Travel Distance (Average) 2163 ft' 2163 ft Travel Time (Total) 29.5 veh -h /h" 35.4 pers -h /h Travel Time (Average) 53.6 secs 53.6 secs Travel Speed 27.5 mph 27.5 mph Operating Cost (Total)` 378 $ /h` 378 $/h Fuel Consumption (Total) 40.1 ga /h Carbon Dioxide (Total) 379.4 kg /h Hydrocarbons (Total) 0.626 kg /h Carbon Monoxide (Total) 28.30 kg /h NOX (Total) 0.896 kg /h Ce \Documents and Settings \]CPE \My Documents \Roundabouts \SW 67 Ave &SW 64 St Produced by aaSIDRA 2.0.3.217 Copyright© 2000 -2002 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd Generated 5/4/2006 7:41:52 PM 11 MAY 1 fileWCADocuments and Settings \XPETocal Settings \Temp\ 1622AF.HTM i 5/4/2006 ':, �',v. � -�5°.; ,.� ,.f�+'.? y#�Ti. ,�s��a°"3""�.,# =s ,w"°�xoW�V^?k N;,.4 v ,! 4Y. w�•'E?!fi�nt%..o �.,, .,v 4ti..4 Movement Summary Page 1 of z Movement Summary S SW 6`7 Avenue & SW 64 Street Roundabout Vehicle Movements Dem Flow Cap Deg of Aver Delay Level of 95% Back of Eff. Stop- Aver Speed Oper Cost Mov No Turn (veh /h)' (veh /h) Satn Service Queue Rate (mi /h) ($ /h) (v /c) (sec) South Approach 32 L 4 1585 0.278 5.3 LOS A 56 0.44 ' 33.7 73 32 T 393 1585 0.278 5.3 LOS A 56 _ 0.44 33.7 73 32 R 42 1585 0.278 5.3 LOS A 56 0.44 33.7 73 Approach 441 1585 0.278 5.3 LOS A 56 0.44. 33.7 73 East Approach 22 L 100 1109 0.673 10.2 LOS B 225 0.77 30.7 123 22 T 545 1109 0.673 10.2 LOS B 225 0.77 30.7 123 22 R 101 1109 0.673 10.2 LOS B 225 0.77 30.7 123 Approach 746 1109 0.673' 10.2 LOS B ` • 225 0.77 -30.7 123 North Approach 42 L 63 770 0.884 28.9 LOS C 482 ` 1.39 22.6 159 42 T 537 770 0.884 28.9 LOS C 482 1.39 22.6 159 42 R 80 770 0.884 28.9 LOS C 482 1.39 22.6 159 Approach 681 770 0.884 28.9 LOS C 482 1.39 22.6 159 West Approach 12 L 14 680 0.169 8.5 LOS A 29 0.66 26.5 23 12 T 82 680 0.169 8.5 LOS A 29 0.66 26.5 23 12 R 16 680 0.169 8.5 LOS A 29 ` 0.66 26.5 23 Approach 115 680 0.169 8.5 LOS A 29 0.66 26.5 23 All Vehicles 1983 4143 0.884 15.4 LOS B 482 0.90 27.5 378 C: \Documents and Settings \]CPE \My Documents \Roundabouts \SW 67 Ave & SW 64 St Produced by aaSIDRA 2'.0.3.217 Copyright@ 2000 -2002 Akcelik &- Associates Pty Ltd' Generated 5/4/2006 7:42:59 PM --A 0-44: -.,-\ rrDTAT' -1 Co + +i-. o \Tamn\ t 72S2R uT1VT 5/4/2006 degsatn_ Page I of Degree of Saturation, as rafftc SIDRA Demand Volume`/ Capacity (v /c) ratio' SW 67 Avenue & SW 64 Street Intersection Type �flli Roundabout t 3 f [ M1 is E� E AN I � Cd \Documents and Settings \7CPE \My Documents \Roundabouts \SW 67 Ave & SW 64 St Produced by aaSIDRA 2.0.3.217 Copyright.© 2000 -2002 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd Generated 5/4/2006 7:43:59 PM —A 0-44--k Tf DT \T l 1 Q1174 TTTK/f 5/d /illm �;qr.�� � o .,, .., �, „rte, �,,°�,,, ., ,,-. �_R,�� �•.�, ctrldelayav Page 1 of 1 z Control Delay (Average) all M4 .fates a Traffic SIDRA Average control delay per vehicle ,(seconds) SW 67 Avenue & SW 64 Street Intersection Type _ wn A t' Roundabout OX f MI pap I f i.i ! A-W�. M �t� C: \Documents and Settings \]CPE \My Documents \Roundabouts \SW 67 Ave & SW 64 St Produced by aaSIDRA 2.0.3.217 Copyright'O 2000 -2002' Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd Generated 5/4/2006 7:44:42 PM 1 ODr% '1 1Z u'rT%X lld�7l 11 lfl geodelayav Page 1 of ] z Geometric Delay, We aaTraffite SIDRA Average geometric delay per vehicle (seconds) SW 67 Avenue & SW 64 Street Intersection Type Roundabout MI or E E, C: \Documents and Settings \]CPE \My Documents \Roundabouts \SW 67 Ave & SW 64 St Produced by aaSIDRA 2.0.3.217 Copyright© 2000 -2002 Akcelik &Associates Pty Ltd Generated 5 /4/2006 7:45 :07 PM .. " a C1 --- -- 101000 u'rk4 sldelayav Page 1 of l Sto p line Dela y (Average) alcr�li ssoe%tes a`c SIDRA Average stop -tine delay per vehicle (seconds) SW 67 Avenue & SW 64 Street C: \Documents and Setting s\3CPE\ My Documents \Roundabouts \SW 67 Ave & SW 64 St Produced by aaSIDRA:2.0.3.217 I Copyright© 2000 -2002 Akcelik &Associates Pty Ltd Generated 5/4/2006 7:45:17 PM i i x CIA /1 AN< Intersection Type €� Ail1 Roundabout E � A �Ct _ o" ESE VIM,, E WWA C: \Documents and Setting s\3CPE\ My Documents \Roundabouts \SW 67 Ave & SW 64 St Produced by aaSIDRA:2.0.3.217 I Copyright© 2000 -2002 Akcelik &Associates Pty Ltd Generated 5/4/2006 7:45:17 PM i i x CIA /1 AN< aceflow'. Page 1 of l 2 Approach, Circulating and Exiting na Iik, Flows as ` tic SID RA Approach, circulating and exiting flow rates as used by the program (veh /h) SW 67 Avenue & SW 64 Street C: \Documents and Settings \]CPE \My Documents \Roundabouts \SW 67 Ave & SW 64 St Produced by aaSTDRA 2.0.3.217 Copyright.© 2000 -2002 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd Generated 5 /4/2006 7:45 :28 PM T T- ! c in /1) MA wr- Intersection Type _£r,1c1 Roundabout T1�W ei t� i 12"r� MI 1 i 446 ,: ! T!, ' "t-h 00 C: \Documents and Settings \]CPE \My Documents \Roundabouts \SW 67 Ave & SW 64 St Produced by aaSTDRA 2.0.3.217 Copyright.© 2000 -2002 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd Generated 5 /4/2006 7:45 :28 PM T T- ! c in /1) MA wr- progflow Page I of l Demand Flow O gl1 Wes aaTra ft SIDRA Total flow rates as used by the program (veh /h) SW 67 Avenue & SW 64 Street Intersection Type Roundabout OR i1�1■i`i1M1tt Mi 3 OMMA i C: \Documents and Settings \]CPE \My Documents \Roundabouts \SW 67 Ave & SW 64 St Produced by aaSIDRA 2.0.3.217 Copyright© 2000 -2002 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd Generated 5/4/2006 7:45 :56 PM I! 4 1nd1 n04 Intersection Type Roundabout Jc Oft i € s S, a� ..'AM { C: \Documents and Settings \)CPE \My Documents \Roundabouts \SW 67 Ave & SW 64 St Produced by aaSIDRA 2.0.3.217 Copyright© 2000 - 2002 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd Generated 5/4/2006 7:46:08 PM •�• • f r/YTT \T _ _1 Cl.u___.__ \T...Y. —X i A AODD LT-r-k f .. 5/A/9nO 6 los Page 1 of 1 Level of Service associates aa`c SIDRA "Based on Delay (HCM method) SW 67 Avenue & SW 64 Street Intersection Type =�3tpri°i Roundabout Ali-& !MJ Fes; t 11T117 [j (l �t C: \Documents and Settings \3CPE \My Documents \Roundabouts \SW 67 Ave & SW 64 St Produced by aaSIDRA 2.0.3.217 Copyright© 2000 -2002; Akcelik & Associates Pit► Ltd Generated 5/4/2006 7:46:19 PM i j I rr, Tl%T - -, rl I A 11 r-C u'rKX 5/4/7(lnFi Intersection Type OEM Apoto #Ohl Roundabout I t y 1� 1 M, c itai 4 € 5 U MAW j( i C: \Documents and Settings \7CPE \My Documents \Roundabouts \SW 67 Ave & SW 64 St Produced by aaSIDRA 2.0.3.217 Copyright© 2000 -2002 Akceiik & Associates "Pty Ltd` Generated 5 /4/2006 7:46:38 PM __-I Q, u: «,..,. \T,....., «G 1 A- 71;!''ti T-T -17AX 51A11006 - - rcn — r ;.r , C: \Documents and Settings \]CPE \My Documents \Roundabouts \SW 67 Ave & SW 64 St Produced by aaSIDRA 2,0.3.217 Copyright© 2000 -2002 Akcelik'& Associates Pty Ltd Generated 5/4/2006 7:47:13 PM Tin /A/ TTT,,.T c/AMMA �, Intersection Type Notts- A ! Roundabout E MI 'Mal£ 4 l 3 C: \Documents and Settings \]CPE \My Documents \Roundabouts \SW 67 Ave & SW 64 St Produced by aaSIDRA 2,0.3.217 Copyright© 2000 -2002 Akcelik'& Associates Pty Ltd Generated 5/4/2006 7:47:13 PM Tin /A/ TTT,,.T c/AMMA �, Intersection Type INOMAl i Roundabout E [ _ I i # � E m[ rim y ! •� [ AIL F _'_ E C: \Documents and Settings \7CPE \My Documents \Roundabouts \SW 67 Ave & SW 64 St Produced by aaSIDRA 2.0.3.217 Copyright© 2000 -2002 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd_ Generated 5 /4/2006 7:47:29 PM cinMM4 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd - aaSIDRA 2.0.3.217 Miami -Dade Public Works Department Traffic Engineering Registered User No. A1140 Licence Types Professional, Multi Computer Time and Date of Analysis 3:43 PM, Aug 15,2005 Filename: C: \Documents and 'Settings \JCPE \My Documents \Roundabouts \SW 67 Ave &'SW 64 St.OUT SW 67 Avenue & SW 64 Street Roundabout Study PM Peak Intersection ID: 1 aaTraffic SIDRA US Highway Capacity Manual (2000) Version RUN INFORMATION * Basic Parameters: Intersection Type: Roundabout Driving on the right -hand side of the road Input data specified in US units Default Values File No. 11 Peak flow period (for performance): 15 minutes Unit time (for volumes): 60 minutes (Total Flow Period) Delay definition: Control delay Geometric delay included HCM Delay and Queue Models option selected Level of Service based on: (HCM method) Queue definition: Back of queue, 95th Percentile SW 67 Avenue '& SW 64 Street Roundabout Study PM Peak Intersection ID: 1 DEFAULT PARAMETERS Default values for some of the important general parameters: (Default Values File: DEFII.SDF) 1. Basic saturation flow: 1900 -tcu /h This value applies mainly to signalised intersections. For roundabouts and sign - controlled intersections, it is used for determining capacity ` of ;priority and continuous movements. 2. Through car equivalents for signalised intersections - L E F T THROUGH R I G H T -IV HV LV HV IV HV Normal 1.053 2.000 1.000 2.000 1.176 2.000 Restricted 1.303 2.500 1.426 2.500 3. Opposed 'turn parameters (Roundabout) Crit. Fol.up Min. t Exit Flow Gap Hdway` Deps Opposing Left turns V V 2.5 0 Through, V V 2.5 0 Right turns: V V 2.5 0` 4. Cruise speed= 40 mi /h, Approach Distance= 1800 ft 5 Queue space per vehicle in feet Light vehicles: 25.0 Heavy vehicles: 45.0 'a=.. A—P-,. 1 4— —A i o rritrcn in i-ha ,u � ; Flow Headway Vehicles (s) Headway (pcu /h)' (s) (s) West: West Approach Left 1 Dominant 700 2.00 0.622 4.50 2.28` Thru 1 Dominant 700 2.00 0.622 4.50 2.28 Right 1 Dominant 700 2.00 0.622 4.50 2.28 South: South Approach Left -,1 Dominant 159 2.00 0.199 4.13 1.92 Thru 1 Dominant 159 2,.00 0.199 4.13 1.92 Right 1 Dominant 159 2.00 0.199 4.13 1.92 East: East Approach Left 1 Dominant 412 2.00 0.436 4.45 2.15 Thru 1 Dominant 412 2.00 0.436 4.45 2.15. Right 1 Dominant 412 2.00 0.436 4.45 2.15, North: North Approach Left 1 Dominant 649 2.00 0.594 4.45 2.23 Thru 1 Dominant 649 2.00 0.594 4.45 2.23 Right 1 Dominant 649 2.00 0.594 4.45 2.23 SW .67 Avenue & SW 64 ,Street I Roundabout Study PM Peak Intersection ID:_ 1 Roundabout Table R.5 ROUNDABOUT CAPACITY & LEVEL OF SERVICE - aaSIDRA & HCM MODELS --------------------- aaSIDRA I HCM 2000 Lower HCM 2000 Upper MovDem -------------------- ------ - - - - -- - - - - -- -' -- - - - - -- - - - -- No. Flow Cap. Deg. Av. Cap. Deg. Av. Cap. Deg. Av._ (veh (veh Satn Delay LOS (veh Satn Delay LOS (veh Satn Delay LOS /h), /h) x (sec) /h) x (sec) /h) x (sec)' - -- -----==-------------- - - - - -- - -- ------ - - - - -- - - - - -- West: West Approach 12 LTR 115 680 0.169 8.5 A 640 0.180 8.6 A 792 0.145 8.0 A - - - -- ----------=-------------------------------------- -680 0.169 8.5 A 640 0.180 8.6 A 792 0.145 8.0 A I South: South Approach 32 LTR 441 1585 0.278 5.3 A 1014 0.435 5.7 A 1220 0.361 5.4 A --------------------------------------------------------------- 1585 0.278 5.3 A 1014 0.435 5.7 A 1220 0.361' 5.4 A East: East Approach 22 LTR 746 1109 0.673 10.2 B 815 0.915 21.4 C 1001 0.745 11.4 B 1109 0.673 10.2 B 815 0.915 21.4 C 1001 0.745 11.4 B North: North Approach 42 LTR 681 770 0.884 28.9 C 661 1.030 55.1 E 828 0.822 21.1' C 770 0.884 28.9 C 661 1.030 55.1 E 828 0.822 21.1 C `- - - - - -- - - -- - - - - -- ------------------------------------------------------ ALL VEHICLES: 4144 0.884 15.4 B 3130 1.030 28.7 C 3841 0.822 13.2 B I ------ - - - - -- --------------------------- ---------- - - - - -- -- -- - - - - -- i SW 67 Avenue & SW 64 Street' Roundabout Study ,PM Peak Intersection: ID: 1- Roundabout i i Table R.6 - ROUNDABOUT ALTERNATIVE CAPACITY, MODELS - Largest back of queue, 95% (ft) _ 482 Performance Index _ 49.96 Degree of saturation (highest) _ 0.884 Practical Spare Capacity (lowest) _ -4 Total vehicle capacity, all lanes (veh /h) = 4143 " Total vehicle flow (veh /h) = 1983 Total person flow (pers /h) = 2380 Total vehicle :delay (veh -h /h) = 8.50 Total person delay (pers -h /h), = 10.21 Total effective vehicle stops (veh /h) _ 1789' Total effective person stops (pegs /h) = 2147 Total vehicle travel (veh -mi /h) = 812.4 Total cost ($ /h) = 377.67 Total fuel (ga /h)` _ 40.1 Total CO2 (kg /h) _ 379.41 SW 67 Avenue & SW 64 Street Roundabout Study PM Peak Intersection ID: 1 Roundabout Table 'S.5 - MOVEMENT PERFORMANCE ----------------------- - - - - -- Mov Total- Total Aver. Pro p Eff. Longest Queue Perf. g Aver. No. Delay Delay Delay Queued Stop 95o Back Index Speed (veh -h /h) (pegs -h /h) (sec) Rate - - - - -- (vehs) (ft) (mph) ----------------------------- West: West Approach 12 LTR 0.27 0.33 8.5 0.70 0.66 1.1 29 2.67 26.5 South: South Approach 32 LTR 0.65 0.78 5.3 0.33 0.44 2.2 56 7.03 33.7 East: East Approach 22 LTR 2.11 2.53 10.2 0.75 0.77 -'=-------------------------------------'------------=---------------------- 8.9 225 15.68 30.7 North: North Approach 42 LTR 5.47' 6.56 28.9 0.93 1.39 19.0 482 24.58 22.6 'I SW 67 Avenue' & SW 64 Street I Roundabout Study PM Peak Intersection ID: 1 Roundabout I Table S.6 - INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE ------------------------- Total Deg. Total' Total Aver. Prop. Eff. Longest Perf. Aver.' Flow Satn Delay Delay Delay Queued Stop Queue Index Speed (veh /h) x (veh -h /h) (pers- h /h)1(sec) Rate (ft)' (mph) West: West Approach 115 0.169 0.27" 0.33 8.5 0.702 0.66 29 2.67 26.5 South: South Approach 441 0.278 0.65 0.78 5. -3 0.339 0.44 56 7.03- - 33.7 - - - -- -------------------------------------------=----------------------- East: East Approach I 746 0.673 2.11 2.53` 10.2 0.756 -0.77- _- -- -- - - - - 225 - -- ---------------------- 15.68 30.7- - -- - - - -° North: North Approach I i 681 0.884 5.47 6.56 28.9 0.939 1.39 482 24.58 - 22!.6 - - - -- it ------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION (persons). 2380 0.884 10.21 15.4 0.723 0.90 49.96 27.5 No. Typ Flow Cap. Util Satn Delay Stop ,Back of Index (veh (veh Rate Queue /h) /h) ( %) x (sec) (veh) West: -West Approach 12 LTR 115- 680 100 0.169 8.5 0.66 1.1 2.67 South: South Approach 32 LTR 441 1585 100 0.278 5.3: 0.44 2 -.2 7.03 East: East Approach 22 LTR 746 1109 100 0.673 10.2 0.77 8.9 15.68' North: North Approach 42 LTR 681 770 100 0.884* 28.9 « 1.39 19.0 24.58 * Maximum degree of saturation SW 67 Avenue & SW 64; Street Roundabout Study PM Peak' Intersection ID: 1 Roundabout Table S.12A - FUEL; CONSUMPTION, AND COST TOTAL Mov Fuel Cost HC` CO NOX CO2 No. Total Total Total Total Total Total gal /h $/h kg /h kg /h kg /h kg /h West: West Approach 12 LTR 2.5 23.26 0.038 1.89 0.054 23.4 2.5 23.26 0.038 1.89 0.054 23.4 South South Approach 32 LTR 8.3' 72.65 0.123 5.53 0.188 78.6' 8.3 72.65 0.123 5.53 0.188 78.6 East East Approach 22 LTR 13.0 122.67 0.200 8.46 0.283 123.3 13.0 122.67 0.200 8.46 0.283 123.3'' North: North Approach` 42 LTR 16.3' 159.09 0.265 12.42 0.372 154.1 16.3 159.09 0.265 12.42 0.372 154.1 INTERSECTION: 40.1 377.67 0.626 28.30 0.896 379.4 PARAMETERS USED IN COST CALCULATIONS Pump price of fuel ($ /US gal)' = 1.600 Fuel resource cost factor = 0.70 Ratio of ,running cost to fuel 'cost = 3.0 Average income ($ /h) = 17`.00 Time value factor = 0.40 Average occupancy (persons /veh) 1.2 Light vehicle mass (1000 'lb) 3.1 Heavy vehicle mass (1000 lb) = 24.0 Light vehicle idle fuel rate (US gal /h) = 0.360 Heavy vehicle idle fuel rate (US gal /h) = 0.530 62 538 81 681 2 0.884 28.9 482' ALL VEHICLES Total o Max Aver'. Max Flow HV X; Delay Queue 1983 2 0.884 15.4, 482 - - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- Total flow period = 60 minutes. Peak flow period = 15 minutes. > Queue values in this table are 95% back of queue (feet). Note: Basic Saturation Flows are not adjusted at roundabouts or sign- controlled intersections and apply only to continuous lanes. SW 67 Avenue & SW 64 Street Roundabout Study PM Peak Intersection ID: 1 Roundabout Table S.15 - CAPACITY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE Mov Mov Total Total Deg. Aver. LOS No. Typ Flow Cap_ of Delay (veh (veh Satn, /h) /h) (v /c) (Sec) West: West Approach 12 LTR 115 680 0.169 8.5 A 115 680 0.169 8.5 A South: South Approach 32 LTR 441 1585 0.278 5.3 A 441 1585 0.278 5.3 A East: East Approach 22 LTR 746 1109 0.673 10.2 B 746 1109 0.673' 10.2 B North: North Approach 42 LTR 681 770 0.884* 28.9 C 681 770 0 -.884 28.9 C ALL VEHICLES: 1983 4143 0.884' 15 -.4 B Level of Service calculations are based on average control delay including geometric delay (HCM criteria) independent of the current delay definition used. For the criteria,' refer to the "Level of Service" topic in the aaSIDRA Output Guide or the Output section of the on -line ''help: Maximum v/c ratio, or critical green periods SW 67 Avenue & SW 64 Street Roundabout Study PM Peak Intersection ID: 1 Roundabout Table D.0 GEOMETRIC DELAY DATA Negn Negn Negn Appr. Downstream From To Radius Speed Dist. Dist. Distance Approach Approach (ft) (mph) (ft) (ft) (ft) West: West Approach .South: South Approach 1_ LTR 0.278 0.18 0.00 0.26 0.44 0.339 0.00 East: East Approach Table D.3 -`LANE QUEUES 1 LTR 0.673 0.61 0.07 0.09 0.77 0.756 0.15 North: North Approach Queue Lane Satn Queue ----------- - - - - -- 1 LTR 0.884 0.88 0.48 0.03 1.39 0.939 1.13 hg is the average value for all movements in a shared lane hqm is average queue move -up rate for all vehicles queued and unqueued SW 67 Avenue & SW 64 Street Roundabout , Study 'PM ;Peak Intersection ID: 1 South Approach 32 Roundabout 39.9 33.7 33.7 East:', East Approach Table D.3 -`LANE QUEUES 22 40.0 25.4 25.4 32.7 Deg. Ovrfl. Average (veh) 30.9 30.7 Percentile (veh) Queue Lane Satn Queue ----------- - - - - -- ----------------------- 40.0 25.9 25.9 - - - - -- Stor. No. x No Nbl Nb2 Nb 70's 850 900 95% 90 Ratio West: West Approach End of aaSIDRA Output - -- xT :x"T'_'.".?' .. :.,� .s = -me.- •��`Q =. ., %^a.. '`:Z' -rr",'�"':: r,:. � ;j� a�Y,., I' -T `3"; "�+ � : r#`.�^ =,R.:.:n" .n� .T,�i �, ?ems - 1 LTR 0.169 0.0 -0.4 0.0 0.4 0.7 0.8 0.9' 1.1 •1.3 0.02 South: South Approach 1 LTR 0.278 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.7 1.3 1.6 1.8 2.2' 2.5 0.03 East: East Approach 1 LTR 0.673 0.4 2.3 0.7 3.0 5.0 6.2 7.1 8.9 10.3 0.13 North: North Approach 1 LTR 0.884 2.9 2.8 3.9 6.,8 10.2 12.9 14.9 19.0 ,22.3 0.27 Values printed in this table are back of queue '(vehicles). SW 67 Avenue & SW 64 Street Roundabout Study PM Peak Intersection ',ID: 1 Roundabout Table D.4 - MOVEMENT SPEEDS ,(mph) Queue Move -up App. Speeds Exit Speeds. ------- - - - - -- Av. Section Spd Mov_ ------ - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- 1st 2nd --------------- No. Cruise Negn Negn Cruise Grn Grn Running Overall West: 'West Approach 12 30.0 25.4 25.4 40.0 26.6 26.5 South: South Approach 32 40.0 27.0 27.0 39.9 33.7 33.7 East:', East Approach 22 40.0 25.4 25.4 32.7 16.5 30.9 30.7 North: North Approach 42 40.0 25.9 25.9 38.8 14.1 26.1 22.6 "Running Speed" is the average speed excluding stopped period's. - -- End of aaSIDRA Output - -- xT :x"T'_'.".?' .. :.,� .s = -me.- •��`Q =. ., %^a.. '`:Z' -rr",'�"':: r,:. � ;j� a�Y,., I' -T `3"; "�+ � : r#`.�^ =,R.:.:n" .n� .T,�i �, ?ems - sour y South Miami 04 �, Ail- AmmicaCh INCORPORATED CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI ° � o 1927 P OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER INTER- OFFICE MEMORANDUM 2001 To: The Honorable Mayor Feliu and Members of the City Commission Via: Yvonne S. McKinley, Acting City Manager`«°.' From: Randy Wiscombe, Vice Mayor Item: Date: June 6, 2006. Agenda �. Subject: Operational review and performance -based audit Requests A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY ` OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO 'HIRING A FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTING FIRM; AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF AN RFQ FOR PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTING AND OPERATIONAL REVIEW AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Reason/Need: The attached resolution is requesting your authorization to prepare, a request for qualifications (RFQ) to hire a qualified management consulting firm to conduct a review of selected departments, divisions and /or policies to ensure continued compliance with federal, state, county laws, and the City's Charter as well as enhancing efficiency and effectiveness of City operations. Article IV, Finance, Section 4. F of the City Charter requires a performance -based audit for each department at least once every five years, Funding Source: General Contingency account Backup Documentation: Copy of the City Charter Article IV, Finance, Section 4. F. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2 3 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE 5 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO HIRING A 6 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTING FIRM; AUTHORIZING 7 THE ISSUANCE OF AN RFQ FOR PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTING 8 AND OPERATIONAL REVIEW AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT 9 SERVICES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 10 11 12 WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami desire, in good 13 faith, to conduct an operational review as well as a performance -based audit, as required by the 14 Charter to confirm and ensure the current and future health of City; and, 15 16 WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to periodically hire a qualified 17 management consulting firm to conduct a review of selected departments, divisions and /or 18 policies in order to ensure continued compliance with federal, state, county and municipal laws, 19 and more specifically, ensure compliance with the City's charter; and, 20 21 WHEREAS, the firm shall report to the city commission as to areas of City operation in 22' need of enhanced efficiency and effectiveness; and, 23 24 WHEREAS,' it is in the best interest of the City to review its processes in order to 25 confirm and guarantee that there has not been misconduct or misfeasance in conduction financial 26 operations and 27 28 WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission desire to develop an RFQ for a qualified 29 management consulting firm. - 30 31 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY 32 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA; 33 34 Section 1. The above whereas clauses are incorporated by reference into this 35 resolution: 36 37 Section 2. City staff is instructed to prepare a request for qualifications (RFQ) for 38 management consulting services, which RFQ shall be presented to the City Commission, for its 39 approval, at the next City Commission meeting. The RFQ, upon approval, shall be advertised 40 and distributed. The City Commission shall then select a qualified: management consulting firm 41 to conduct an operational review and performance -based audit of selected departments, divisions 42 and /or policies of the City of South Miami. The consultant shall prepare a final written report 43 that shall include findings and recommendations.' 44 45 Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon approval. 46 47 PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of June, 2006. 48 49 ATTEST: APPROVED: 50 51 52' CITY CLERK MAYOR 53 1 COMMISSION VOTE: 2 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mayor Feliu: 3 Vice Mayor Wiscombe: 4 Commissioner Birts: 5 Commissioner Palmer: 6 Luis R. Figueredo, Office of City Attorney Commissioner Beckman: 7 Nagin, Gallop &'Figueredo, P.A. 8 9 10 J: \FORMS \resolutions \oper.review & perform based audit res.DOC ARTICLE III (Cont'd) D. Prepare and submit to the Commission at the end of the fiscal year a complete report on the finances and administrative activities of the City for the preceding year. E. >Direct and supervise the administration of all departments, offices and agencies' of the City, except as otherwise provided by this Charter or by law. (Amended 2/8/00) F. Attend all Commission meetings with the right to take part in discussion. G. Perform such other duties as are specified in this Charter or which may be required;; by the Commission H. Contract for the purchase of any goods or services for any department of the City in an amount up to and including ($5,000.00. All contracts for goods and services in excess of $5,000.00 shall be approved by the City Commission. The City Manager shall, report all expenditures to the City Commission monthly. (Amended 278/00) All purchases shall be approved 'after competitive conditions shall have been maintained and competitive bids sought from at least three different sources of supply if available, such determination to be made by the Commission, and, notwithstanding the foregoing, the City may make purchases through other governmental agencies that have followed similar bidding procedures,. This subsection does not apply to the purchase of legal and 'expert services that have been approved by the City Commission. (Amended 2/8/00) ARTICLE IV` Finance SECTION 1. Fiscal Year The fiscal year of the City of South Miami shall be the same as that set by Dade County or its successors. SECTION 2 Bu4pa A. The City Manager shall submit to the Commission, 60 days prior to the beginning of the fiscal year, an annual budget 17 soil MUMS CITY CHARTER AMENDED 2119!06 ii':�.r ARTICLE IV (Cont'd) together with an explanatory message.. The budget, budget message s and all supporting schedules, shall be 'a public record open to public inspection by anyone. B. Public Hearings At the meeting of the Commission at which the budget and budget message are submitted, the Commission shall determine the time and place for -a public hearing on the budget, at which time, interested persons shall be given an opportunity to be heard. The City Clerk shall post a notice of the place and time not less than five days after the date of posting at which time the Commission will hold a public hearing. C. Adjustments After conclusion of such public hearings, the Commission may insert new items or may increase, decrease or delete the items of the budget; provided, however, if the total of proposed expenditures be increased thereby, then and in that event, the City Clerk shall post a notice setting forth the nature of the proposed increase and listing a place and time not Tess than five days after ` the date of posting of the public hearing thereon. D. Adoption The budget shall be adopted by three affirmative votes of the City Commission before the first day of the new fiscal year. Should the Commission take no final action on or prior to the date, the budget, as submitted, shall be deemed to have been finally adopted by the Commission, provided that if the provision for funds in any department or departments exceeds (10 %) of the previous year's budget, then as to that department or departments the Commission shall be deemed to have approved the previous year's budget. (Amended 2/8/00) E. Certification A copy of the budget as finally adopted shall be certified by the City Manager and the budget so certified shall be filed' for the use of all offices and departments. F. Modifications (1) Transfer of Appropriation At the request of the City Manager, the Commission may at any time transfer, by resolution, any unencumbered appropriation balance or portion thereof between general classification of expenditure within an office or department. At the request of the City Manager and within the last three months of the budget year, the Commission may, by F resolution, transfer any unencumbered appropriation balance or portion thereof from one office or department to another. 18 SPUTA MIAMI CITY CHARTER � AMENDED 2/14/06 ARTICLE IV (Cont'd) (2) E'mergenay Appropriation In case of disaster or any other circumstance creating an emergency, the Commission may at any time in any budget year, make an emergency appropriation for the purpose of repairing damages caused by such disaster or meeting such public emergency to the end that public health, safety or welfare will be protected. In any budget year where circumstances creating such an emergency have arisen, the Commission may, upon recommendation of the City Manager, authorize the borrowing of money by the issuance of negotiable notes of the City. Such notes shall not exceed 10% of the total operating; appropriations in the current year and may be renewed from time to time; but all such notes, together with the renewals, shall mature and be paid not later than the end of the fiscal year, after the budget year in which' the. original notes shall have been issued. Such notes shall not constitute a general obligation nor a pledge of ad Valorem tax revenues. Notes may not be sold at less than par and accrued interest at private sale without previous advertisement.` SECTION 3 Revenues A.. Taxation The Commission shall levy such taxes as authorized bylaw -to meet the appropriations made not later than the next Commission meeting after adoption of the budget as provided in Article IV, Section 2 D. If the Commission shall refuse or 'neglect to pass an ordinance levying the taxes for any budget year, the ordinance last' previously passed levying taxes shall continue in full ;force and effect and a failure ` to pass' a current ordinance 'shall in no way invalidate' the collection of any taxes B. Assessment In the event Dade County shall fail or cease to assess property,' the `City 'shall have the right,.power and duty to assess all property in an amount not to exceed that permitted by State Law or the Home Rule Amendment. C. Bonds The City shall have the power to issue bonds, certificates of indebtedness and any form of tax anticipation 1 certificates, payable from ad valorem taxation and maturing more than twelve months after issuance only to finance or refinance capital projects. Votes referendum approval for bonds and other forms of indebtedness shall be as provided by the Florida constitution. (Amended 2/8/00) 19 SOUTH MIAMI CITY CHARTER AMENDED 2/14 106 ARTICLE IV (COnt'd) SECTION 4. Administration A. Control The City Manager shall have charge of the administration '`of the financial affairs of the City in accordance with Article III, Section 5. B. Custody of Public Funds The City Manager shall have custody of all public funds belonging to or under control of the City or any office or department thereof, and deposit all fund coming into his or her hands in such depositories as may be designated by Resolution of the Commission. c. AMroval of Expenditures The City Manager shall approve all proposed expenditures, but, ;unless he or she shall certify that there is an unencumbered" balance of appropriation and available funds, no appropriation shall be encumbered and no expenditure shall be made. D. Multi- annual Contracts No contract involving the payment of ° money ou't of the 'appropriations of more than one year shall be made for a`period of more than five years, nor shall any such contract be valid unless made or approved by erd r..r...,. resolution adopted by the Commission. The Commission shall provide budget and appropriate funds in each succeeding budget for contracts extending: more than one year. This section shall not restrict the term- of General Obligation ° or >Revenue Bonds. (Amended 2114/06) E. Audit The Commission shall designate a qualified Certified Public Accountant who, at the end of the fiscal year and at such other times as ordered by the Commission, shall make an independent examination in accordance with `generally accepted auditing standards and review of accounts and other financial transactions by the City and shall submit such report; together with recommendations for improving fiscal_ control, to the Commission and to the City Manager. The accountant 'shall_ have no personal interest, direct or indirect, in the fiscal affairs of the City government or any of its officers. The accountant shall not maintain any accounts or records of the City business, but within specifications approved by the Commission, shall post- audit the annual financial statements of the City and all accounts kept by any office or department of the City. The Certified Public Accountant shall not 'serve as the city's independent auditor for more than three consecutive years. (Amended 2/8/00) 20 SOUTH WAND CITY CHARTER AMENDED 2114106 ., ,�� ��2+r�rs�nrs�ma?�'S rt�`;r,��.,u , n`�• -, "�'P^�_FS�._as -fie . ^^^.;..+� �=`TT,^.'�"�? «T�',°"�'�y^`s °5�'s�" ;,�`�_��+s-�f� ��'4'^`�r „^�.A s- r� ARTICLE IV (Cont'd) F. Performance -based audit. The City Commission shall require a performance- based audit for each department at least once every fire years.. (Amended 2 /8/'00) ARTICLE V. Elections SECTION 1. Qualifications A. Voters: Any person who is a duly registered voter of Miami` -Dade County and who has been a legal resident of the City of South 'Miami for a period of no 'less than thirty (30) days immediately before the date of the erection. B. Candidates: The City Clerk shall certify that a candidate for election to the Office of the Mayor or Commissioner, no more than 42 days nor less than 28 days prior to a duly scheduled election has: (1) 'Exhibited to the Clerk proof that he or she is qualified . elector of the City of South Miami and has continuously resided in the City .,of South Miami in a structure designated as residential property for at least one (1) year immediately before the date of the election. (Amended 2/8/00) (2) Each person seeking, to qualify for nomination or ' election to a municipal office shall pay, at the time of qualifying for office, an election assessment fee in addition to a qualifying filing fee of $100 paid to the City Clerk. The requirements to pay an election assessment fee and a qualifying fee may be waived as provided by state law. (Amended 2/8/00) (3) 'taken the following prescribed sworn oath: i "I hereby accept the nomination for Mayor /Commissioner, and agree to serve, if elected, and further that I hereby make the following oaths State of Florida J County of Dade Before me, an officer authorized to administer oaths, personally 21 SOUTH miAM1 erry CHARTER AMENDED 2/14/06' I RESOLUTION NO. 2 3 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF 5 THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO 6 LOBBYING THE STATE LEGISLATURE TO CHANGE STATE 7 LAW SO AS TO PRECLUDE CELLULAR TELEPHONE USAGE 8 BY MOTOR VEHICLE DRIVERS WHILE LOCATED IN A 9 SCHOOL ZONE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 10 11 12 WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami were 13 deeply saddened by recent new reports of the death of a minor child that was crossing the 14 street within a school crossing zone due to a driver's negligence and cellular phone usage 15 while operating a motor vehicle; and, 16 17 WHEREAS, the Mayor' and City Commission are concerned with the health, 18 safety and welfare of minors crossing the street in school crossing areas; and, 19 20 WHEREAS, it would promote the health, safety and welfare of all residents, and 21 in particular would protect the youth of the state if the state were to preclude the use of 22 cellular. telephones by persons operating a ` motor vehicle while located in a school 23 crossing zone; and, 24 25 WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission desire to lobby the State 26 Legislature to amend or modify ° state law so as to preclude the use of cellular telephones 27 by persons operating a motor vehicle while located within a school crossing zone. 28 29 NOW THEREFORE BE IT; RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY 30 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA; 31 32 Section 1. The above whereas clauses are incorporated by reference. 33 34 Section 2. The Mayor and City Commission request that the State Legislature 35 modify existing laws so as to prohibit the use of cellular telephones by persons operating 36 a motor vehicle while located in a school crossing zone. 37 38 Section 3. The City Manager shall transmit a- copy of this resolution to the 39 City's State Representatives and to the State Legislature. 40 41 Section 4. The City Clerk shall provide executed copies of this resolution to 42 the Mayor of Miami -Dade County, each member of the Miami -Dade Board of County 43 Commissioners, as well as each municipal clerk in Miami- Dade County for the purpose 44 of distributing copies to members of their respective governing councils in order to seek 45 support for the proposed change in state law. 46 Additions shown by underlining and deletions shown by ehcrg: I Section 5. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon approval. 2 3 PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of June, 2006.1 4 5 -6 ATTEST: APPROVED: 7 8 CITY CLERK MAYOR 9` 10 i l COMMISSION VOTE: 12 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mayor Feliu: 13 Vice Mayor Wiscombe: 14 Commissioner Birts: 15 Luis R. Figueredo, Commissioner Palmer: 16 Nagin Gallop & Figueredo, P.A. Commissioner Beckman: 17 Office of City Attorney 18 19 Page 2- of 2 ,i. F'°u"�:,-;,,'i,, „5:. CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI INTER- OFFICE MEMORANDUM ♦ .NC C+52 pC4f'.ATKS.+ � 7927 To: Mayor and City Commission Date: June 1, 2006 From: Luis R. Figueredo, Re: Special Hearing Resolution Nagin Gallop & Figueredo, P.A. Office of City Attorney A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO AN APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS; PROVIDING FOR DESIGNATION OF A SPECIAL HEARING OFFICER TO HOLD THE PUBLIC HEARING AND PRESENT IT'S FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE COMMISSION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: Mark Richman Properties initiated a civil action against the city on March 21, 2003, for breach of contract to jointly develop 'a mixed use parking garage and retail building. The action is known as Mark Richman Properties v. City of South Miami, Case No.: 03- 07058- CA =24 (Fla. 11th Cir. Ct. 2003). On February a settlement, agreement was approved by the city commission. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, at such time as the building permit is issued, MRP shall file and dismiss its action and the litigation will be concluded. Section 20 -7.51 of the City of South Miami Land Development Code (LDC) provides that the city commission may by special exception waive strict compliance with the provisions of the Hometown District Overlay Ordinance provided it makes specific findings that the proposed development complies with the criteria delineated in 20- 7.51(1)- (7). Additionally, section 20 -7.52 of the LDC establishes the procedure for special exceptions and requires a minimum of two (2) public hearings. In order to build the mixed -use parking garage project,' several special exceptions are required.! These special exceptions are subject to the public hearing process outlined under 20 -7.51 (1) -(7) of the LDC. At May 30'h public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Board several allegations were made questioning the integrity of the special exception approval process in light of the City being a party to the settlement agreement. I am confident that the Mayor and the City Commission do not have any conflict of interest and are capable of objectively considering evidence presented, and are capable of making the appropriate findings at the special exception public hearing. However, to avoid any misperception concerning the integrity of our public hearing process, it is my recommendation that the Mayor and City Commission appoint a special master to hold a public hearing on the special exceptions, consider all of the testimony and evidence presented, and have the hearing officer present his findings of fact, conclusions and recommendations to the City Commission. This process _shall ensure that there is no appearance of conflict and also ensure that the integrity of the 'quasi-judicial process is maintained. RECOMMENDATION: Approval. ., r 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2' 3 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF 5 THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO AN 6 APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS AS PROVIDED 7 FOR UNDER THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT FOR CIRCUIT COURT CASE: MARK RICHMAN PROPERTIES Y. CITY OF 9 SOUTH MIAMI, UNDER CASE NO.: 03- 07058 -CA -24 (Fla. 11th Cir. 10 Ct. 2003); PROVIDING FOR DESIGNATION OF A SPECIAL 11 HEARING OFFICER TO HOLD A PUBLIC "HEARING ON 12 BEHALF OF CITY COMMISSION, AND PRESENT IT'S 13 FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND 14 RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE COMMISSION; PROVIDING AN 15 EFFECTIVE DATE. 16 17 18 WHEREAS, section 20 -7.51 of the City of South Miami Land Development 19 Code (LDC) provides that the city commission may by special exception waive strict 20 compliance with the provisions of the Hometown District Overlay Ordinance provided it 21 makes specific findings that the proposed development complies with the criteria 22 delineated in 20 -7.51 (1)- (7); and, 23 24 WHEREAS, section 20 -7.52: of the City of South Miami Land Development 25 Code (LDC) establishes the procedure for special exceptions and requires a public 26 hearing before the Planning & Zoning Board and an additional hearing before the city 27 commission; and, 2$ 29 WHEREAS, the city commission passed Resolution No.13- 05- 11992, which 30 approved the settlement of the underlying litigation entitled: Mark Richman Properties v. 31 City of South Miami, under case no.: 03- 07058 -CA -24 (Fla. 11th Cir. Ct. 2003), which 32 settlement agreement contemplates the development of the mixed -.use parking garage 33 project; and, 34 35 WHEREAS, the Mayor and the city commission represent that it does not have 36 any conflict of interest and that it is capable of objectively considering evidence 37 presented and making the appropriate' findings at the special exception public hearing; 38 and, 39 40 WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission desire to avoid any perception of a 41 conflict of interest and a desire to maintain the integrity of the special exception process 42 by providing for a second public hearing to be held by a special hearing officer prior to 43 the final public hearing before the City Commission; and, 44 Additions shown by underlining and deletions shown by eve f I WHEREAS, based upon the foregoing, the Mayor and City Commission desire 2 to appoint a special hearing officer to hold the "second public hearing on the special 3 exception requests of MRP after the "first" Planning and Zoning Board Hearing; and, 4 5 WHEREAS, during the . "second" public hearing the special hearing officer shall 6 issue detailed' findings of fact as required by section 20 -7.51 of the LDC; shall issue a 7 finding of law; and shall present his findings and recommendations to the Mayor and City 8 Commission at a subsequent city commission meeting, during which meeting, the City 9 Commission shall consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board and 10 the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Special Hearing Officer. 11 12 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY 13 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA; 14 15 Section 1 The Mayor and City Commission hereby appoint Mr. George 16 Knox to serve as the special hearing officer to conduct the public hearing for the special 17 exceptions identified under the settlement agreement executed in the matter entitled: 18 Mark Richman Properties v. City of South Miami, under case no.: 03- 07058 -CA -24 (Fla. 19 11" Cir. Ct. 2003), for the project to be located at S.W. 73rd street on the south, S.W. 58" 20 Avenue on the east, S.W. 58th court on the west and an alleyway on the north. The ` 21 special" hearing officer will make specific findings of fact concerning . the criteria 22 delineated in section 20 -7.51 (1)'— (7) of the City's Land Development' Code, conclusions 23 of law, and present his findings and recommendations to the Mayor and Commission for 24 its review and consideration at a subsequent City Commission Meeting so that the Mayor 25 and City Commission can adopt the appropriate zoning resolution based upon findings of 26 fact of the special hearing officer's recommendation. 27 28 Section 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon approval. 29 30 31 PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of June, 2006. 32 33 ATTEST: APPROVED: 34 35 36 CITY CLERK MAYOR 37 38 39 COMMISSION VOTE: 40 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mayor Feliu: 41 Vice Mayor Wiscombe: 42 Commissioner Birts: 43 Luis R. Figueredo, Commissioner Palmer: 44 Nagin Gallop & Figueredo, P.A. Commissioner' Beckman: 45 Office of City Attorney 46 Page 2 of 2 „ ,, _- ,' ��° as,`:'�i,,�.....'�ti�a"�;�i,°�° ,,, t-` �' ?.„„ rz�;^ ?n�..- �r,:—.,--,..- --'s— ..r: a=;y -r � .' �; �" �.:,;- m. n, -- ^' �+,=' rs- r" �,._. i. S`• �rT ,,;- .`'y�"",i;'�S "�q;�'.. ,��c�":`". GEORGE F. KNOX, JR. Professional Profile: Accomplished lawyer and teacher with a proven ability to persuade and inspire with alacrity and skill. Winner of "impossible" cases on behalf of unpopular causes involving civil rights, economic opportunity and citizens' redress. Received extraordinary teacher evaluations from students and faculty at three different law schools Respected leader, credited with being "instrumental in shaping South Florida's economic landscape" through business acumen, civic participation and championing efforts to ensure fair dealings in all aspects of community life. Recipient of many awards and honors. Key Skills: • Communication • Fundraising • Packaging and Presenting Ideas • Leadership CAREER SUMMARY Lezal Practice: The Knox Firm October 1999-Present Principal. Consultant and Strategist, specializing in Public Policy, Finance, Land Use, Local Government Law, Mediation, Arbitration and Negotiations. Adorno & Yoss August 1994 - October 1999 Shareholder. Director of Transaction Department specializing in Government Management and Operation, Public Finance, and Arbitration. Kubicki Draper August 1990 - August 1994 Partner. Director of Corporate and Commercial Division. Created new areas of practice in Public Finance and Commercial Transactions. Long & Knox July 1984 - August 1990 Founder. Specialized in Public Finance, Land Use & Local Government Law. Significant litigation and Administrative proceedings. Paul, Landy, Beiley & Harper, P.A. June 1982 -July 1984 Partner. General Corporate Finance and Public Finance. City Attorney and Director of Law Department, City of Miami October 1976 -June 1982 General Counsel of municipality with population of 357,000. Legal advisor to City Commission. Supervisor of approximately 40 persons. Considered expert on public /private joint - venture development projects. Assistant City Attorney January 1974 -July 1975 Primary duties included preparation and approval of all municipal contracts; revisions of standard forms; Affirmative Action activities; litigation. Academia; Lecturer, Florida International University September 1994 - January 1995 Miami, Florida Public Administration. Lecturer, Nova University Center for the Study of Law August 1980 =May 1982 Fort Lauderdale, Florida Local Government Law. Lecturer, University of Miami School of Law - January 1978 - May 1980 Coral Gables, Florida State and Local Government Law. Assistant Professor of Law, University of Arkansas _ August 1975 - October 1976 Fayetteville, Arkansas Real and Personal Property; Land Finance and Development; State and Local Government. Lecturer, Univ. of Miami School of Business Administration September 1973 - August 1974 Coral Gables, Florida Taught courses in Business Law to undergraduate students. PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS • The Florida Bar` -1973 • U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida • U.S. Court of Appeals for Eleventh Judicial Circuit • U.S. Supreme Court • District of Columbia Bar (inactive) • American Bar Association • National Bar Association EDUCATION Michigan State University 1%6 East Lansing, Michigan B.S. (Zoology) University of Miami School of Law 1973 Coral Gables, Florida Juris Doctor 2 GEORGE F. KNOX, JR. One of Miami's most respected business and community leaders, Mr. Knox has been instrumental in shaping South Florida's diverse economic landscape. Both behind- the - scenes and "on- the - record, Mr. Knox has helped establish many of Miami's signature enterprises. Mr. Knox is an expert in facilitating joint venture partnerships between the public and private sector. During his tenure as Miami City Attorney (1976- 1982), Mr. Knox oversaw the process that led to the construction of the Miami Convention Center /Hyatt Regency Hotel in downtown Miami; development of " the Bank of America building (formerly the Centrust Tower); and the building and operation of Bayside Marketplace on City of Miami land. Since leaving the public sector, Mr. Knox has specialized in public policy, corporate transactions, urban development and strategic planning. He negotiates matters that result in accord and satisfaction between parties, which creates innovative business ventures for a variety of entrepreneurial, corporate and institutional clientele that aim to benefit all parties involved, as well as the community. The approach, which he has coined "the third win ", has positively impacted numerous community organizations, including the Miami -Dade County School Board and the United Way of Miami -Dade County. Mr. Knox is an original member of the Miami Sports & Exhibition Authority and participated in the effort to attract and secure an NBA franchise to Miami. He was also part of the team that helped bring major league baseball to South Florida. George Knox was the first person of African; descent to join the faculty of the University of Arkansas School of Law. He has also lectured at the University of Miami School of Law and its School of Business Administration; Nova University Law School and Florida International University College of Urban and Public Affairs: A champion for change and opportunity in underserved markets, Mr. Knox was Chairman of The Welfare to Work Partnership's Miami Bizlink Program, which helped welfare recipients move off public assistance into entry -level positions. He was Co -Chair of the strategic planning team for Miami- Dade's Empowerment Zone Application Process, a ;partnership of private / public /community efforts to attract millions of Federal i dollars and local matching funds for economic development purposes. As a director of the United :Way of Miami -Dade County, Mr. Knox co- chaired the organization's 1997 Campaign that raised approximately $33 million in contributions. Mr. Knox is a member of the Florida Bar; the National Bar Association; Orange Bowl Committee , and the Miami-Dal de Chamber of Commerce. He has served on the Advisory Board of Florida International University's new law school and is a former Trustee of Florida Memorial University. The University has awarded!! Mr. Knox an Honorary Doctor of Law degree. He is a member of the Board of Directors for Baptist Health Doctors Hospital. His outstanding civic service has won Mr. Knox numerous awards and honors, including the Miami -Dade Community Foundations' James' W. MacLamore Outstanding Volunteer of the Year Award in 2001; he has also received the NCCJ Silver Medallion Award.` George Knox is a member of the Iron Arrow Honor Society, the highest honor attained at the University of Miami, and he currently, serves' on the University President's;Council. Mr. Knox is listed among the "100 Most Powerful People In Miami," by Miami Business magazine. - Knox also appears as a "Power Player" in the April 2006 issue of South Florida CEO magazine. He is a Director of City National Bank, one of the leading Community Banks in Florida. Mr. Knox received his Bachelor of Science degree from Michigan State University, majoring in Zoology, and his Juris Doctorate from the University of Miami School of Law. % S- . -'2% «< .f�. ..'TT sours South Miami '� v All- Am�ieaCits+ • INC 9?7ATEU CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI otv OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER INTER- OFFICE MEMORANDUM 2aoy To: The Honorable Mayor Feliu and Members of the City Commission Via: Yvonne S. McKinley, Acting City Manager From: Don O'Donniley, Planning Director Date: June 6, 2006' Subject: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA APPROVING A FY 05/06 SMCRA BUDGET TRANSFER IN THE AMOUNT OF $382,559 FROM ACCOUNT NUMBERS 610 - 1110- 551 -99 -31 (MOBLEY BUILDING RENOVATION), 610- 1110 - 551 -99 -33 (BUSINESS START -UP), 610- 1110 - 552 -31 -20 (COMMERCIAL REHAB), 610 -1110- 553 -99 -30 (RESIDENTIAL REHAB) AND 610- 1110 - 559 -34 -50 (PART- TIME INTERN) TO ACCOUNT NUMBER 610- 1110 - 583 -61 -10 (LAND ACQUISITION) FOR THE PURPOSE OF PURCHASING PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 6442 _SW 59th PLACE, SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA BEARING FOLIO NO.: 09- 4025 -010- 0180 AND 6443 SW 60tn AVENUE, SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA BEARING FOLIO NO.: 09- 4025 - 010 -0050; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE Request On April 10, 2006, the SMCRA Board approved purchase of properties located at 6442 SW 59th Place and 6443 SW 60th Avenue required for the development of Madison Square for a purchase price of $730,000 (See Exhibit 1 Attached). Both properties are also in jeopardy of being sold during an upcoming foreclosure sale. Staff has recently requested an extension of the foreclosure sale and will seek subsequent approval of a long -term financing bond to purchase all remaining properties required to develop Madison Square. In order to implement the project, the immediate purchase of properties facing foreclosure is critical. Property taxes 'associated with the two properties will also continue to accrue until purchase is finalized by the SMCRA. The current available funding in the SMCRA Land Acquisition Account is $234,061. In order to purchase the two properties, a budget transfer in the amount of $382,559 is required. Once completed, the resulting balance in the SMCRA Land Acquisition Account will be $616,620 (See Exhibit 2 Attached). It should be noted that staff has submitted a request to Miami -Dade County to authorize the disbursement of Community Action Agency (CAA) funding designated for the Madison Square Project. Community Action Agency funding in the total amount of $294,000 will be utilized to supplement SMCRA budgeted funding required to purchase the two properties. Following purchase, any remaining funding in the Land Acquisition Account may be utilized to acquire, an additional property currently under purchase negotiation by the SMCRA. Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution authorizing a budget transfer in the amount of $382,559 from the indicated budget line items (See Exhibit 2) to the Land Acquisition Account. The SMCRA will seek subsequent approval from Miami -Dade County for the above referenced budget amendment. s.",a—.'"° Backup Documentation: Draft Resolution Approved SMCRA Resolution for Property Purchase SMCRA Recommended Budget Line Item Transfers and Projected Balances Approved SMCRA Resolution for Budget Transfer YSM /DOD /SD /JM E \CC \SMCRA Budget Amendment.doc l RESOLUTION NO. 2 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE 4 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA APPROVING A FY 05/06 SMCRA 5 BUDGET TRANSFER IN THE AMOUNT OF $382,559 FROM ACCOUNT 6 NUMBERS 610 -1110- 551 -99 -31 (MOBLEY BUILDING RENOVATION), 7 610- 1110- 551 -99 -33 (BUSINESS START -UP), 610- 1110- 552 -31 -20 8 (COMMERCIAL REHAB), 610 - 1110 - 553 -99 -30 (RESIDENTIAL REHAB) 9 AND 610- 1110 - 559 -34 -50 (PART -TIME INTERN) TO ACCOUNT 10 NUMBER 610- 1110 - 583 -61 -10 (LAND ACQUISITION) FOR THE 11 PURPOSE OF PURCHASING PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 6442 SW 59th' 12 PLACE, SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA BEARING FOLIO NO.: 09 -4025 -010 13 0180 AND 6443 SW 60tH AVENUE, SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA BEARING 14 FOLIO NO.: 09 -4025- 010 -0050; AND ` PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE 15 DATE. 16 17 WHEREAS, on April 10, 2006 the SMCRA Board approved purchase of 6442 SW 59th 18 Place and 6443 SW 60th Avenue required for the Madison Square Development for a total 19 purchase price of $730,000; and 20 21 WHEREAS, 6442 SW 59th Place and 6443 SW 60t" Avenue are in current jeopardy of 22 being sold at an upcoming foreclosure sale; and 23 24 WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the SMCRA to purchase 6442 SW 59th Place and 25_ 6443 SW 60th Avenue prior to the properties being sold as part of a foreclosure action; and 26 27 WHEREAS, property taxes will continue to accrue on 6442 SW 59th' Place and 6443 28 SW 60th Avenue until purchase can be finalized by the SMCRA; and 29 30 WHEREAS, the current available funding amount in Account No. 610 - 1110 - 583- 61 -10, 31 Land Acquisition is $ 234,061; and 32 33 WHEREAS, in order to fund purchase of the two properties, a budget line item 34 transfer in the total amount of $382,559 will be required from the following budget line items to 35 Account No. 610 -1110- 583- 61- 10,,Land Acquisition:' 36 37 610- 1110 - 551 -99 -31 Mobley Building Renovation $210,000 38 610 -1110- 551 -99 -33 Business Start-Up $30,000 39 610 -1110- 552 -31 -20 Commercial Rehab $25;000 40 610- 1110 - 553 -99 -30 Residential Rehab $100,000 41 610- 1110 - 559 -34 -50 Part-Time Intern $17,559; and 42 43 WHEREAS, once the budget transfer' is completed,' the resulting funding in the above 44 referenced accounts will be: 45 46 610 -1110- 583 -61 -10 Land Acquisition $616,620 47 610- 1110 - 551 -99 -31 Mobley Building Renovation $60,000 1 610.1110- 551 -99 -33 Business Start-Up $10,000 2 610 - 1110 - 552 -31.20 Commercial Rehab $25,000 3 610- 11110- 5`53- 99 -30 Residential Rehab $27,500 4 610 -1110- 559 -34 -50 Part-Time Intern $0; and 5 6 `` NOW THEREFORE` BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF 7 THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI THAT: 8 9 Section 1. The City Commission approves a FY 05/06 SMCRA budget line item transfer in 10 the total amount of $382,559 from the following budget line' items in the amounts indicated to 11 Account No. 610 -1110- 583- 61 -10, Land Acquisition: 12 13 610- 1110 - 551 -99 -31 Mobley Building Renovation $210,000 14 610 -1110- 551 -99 -33 Business Start-Up $30,000 15 610- 1110 - 552 -31 -20 Commercial Rehab $25,000 16 610 -1110- 553 -99 -30 Residential Rehab $100,000 17 610- 1110 - 559 -34 -50 Part-Time Intern ` $171559 18 19 Section 2.. The SMCRA will seek subsequent approval from Miami -Dade County for the 20 above referenced FY 05/06 Budget amendment. 21 22 Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon approval: 23 24 25 PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of June, 2006. 26 27 28 ATTEST: APPROVED: 29 30 31 32 CITY CLERK MAYOR 33 34 35 Commission Vote: 36 Mayor Feliu: 37 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: Vice Mayor Wiscombe: 38 Commissioner: Palmer 39 Commissioner Birts: 40 CITY ATTORNEY Commissioner Jay Beckman: 41 42 43 44 C: \Documents and Settings \SRothstein \My Documents \Reso - Ord \CC Resolution - SMCRA Budget Transfer (2).doc 45 2 EXHIBIT 1 RESOLUTION NO. CRA 10 -06 -203 A RESOLUTION OF THE SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ( SMCRA) RELATING TO REAL PROPERTY; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE BETWEEN THE SMCRA AND GRAHAM HANOVER, INC. TO PURCHASE 6442 SW 59th PLACE, SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA BEARING FOLIO NO.: 09- 4025- 010 -0180 AND 6443 SW 60th AVENUE, SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA BEARING FOLIO NO.: 09 -4025- 010 -0050 FOR A TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $730,000.00; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, during the April 11, 2005 SMCRA Meeting, the Board authorized the Executive Director to ', obtain appraisals and to negotiate the purchase of properties required for the development of Madison Square; and WHEREAS, the combined appraised value received by the SMCRA for 6442 SW 591h Place and 6443 SW 60th Avenue is $595,000; and WHEREAS, the South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency ( SMCRA) desires to purchase from Graham Hanover Inc. the following parcels: 6442 SW 59th Place, South Miami, Florida, bearing Folio No. 09- 4025 -010 -0180 and 6443 SW 60th Avenue, South Miami, Florida bearing Folio No.: 09- 4025 -010- 0050;` and WHEREAS, the negotiated purchase price for 6442 SW 59th Place and 6443 SW 60th Avenue is $730,000.00; and, WHEREAS, the SMCRA_ agrees as part of the purchase and sale agreement to provide for an addendum to the agreement to allow for an advance of funds on behalf of Graham Hanover in order pay certain utilities and make certain emergency repairs to the buildings located on the parcels; and WHEREAS, the sale of 6442 SW 59th Place and 6443 SW 60th Avenue will be contingent upon the release of all previously recorded liens against the two properties; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY; Section 1. The South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency ( SMCRA) approves the attached purchase and sale agreement for the purchase of 6442 SW 59th Place, South Miami, Florida, bearing Folio No.: 09-4025-010-0180 and 6443 SW 60th Avenue, South Miami, Florida, bearing Folio No.: 09- 4025 - Pagel of 2 010 - 0050 from Graham Hanover, Inc.; which contract shall be for $730,000.00, via financing approval within 60 days of execution of agreement; and authorizing the attached addendum to the purchase and sale' agreement providing for an advance to Graham Hanover, which advance shall act as a mortgage on the property; provided however, the city commission co -signs the loan documents. Section 2, This resolution shall take effect immediately upon approval. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of April, 2006. ATTEST: APPROVED: QCRETARY 4CHAIRPERS Board Vote: 5 -0 Chair Feliu: absent Vice Chair Wiscombe: Yea READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: Member Palmer: absent Member Brts: Yea Member Beckman: Yea Member Ellis: Yea Member Williams: Yea GE L COUNSEL JAMy Documents \CRA RESOLUTIONS 2006\CRA Reso graham hanover purchase (04 -10 -06 meeting).doc Page 2 of 2 . .� .- �,r^-..raran -^ .,.9 ,.,.Tm:s ,.>m�,..-.�.: r-•, ..;zam .s,r, €��*-+ fir,..:, �,-:,.�-- `7"d`= , g,`; n. ,r° ''Y""'^- s r.- ;T'., ,; :i`.°�",,r,'r�- ';�A'. ^?�.. .� u. .r?, . ��„�..o- ''�S�e....,,'.�z,` u';Pi,' s'3ks'PFS�^. ,.,�. °.:z..!��� �1r,�is�rfmlrF"PT "" rv..r,. ft , F... �, ., "'r,�` - •,;v. , ,m..,re ��'iP �srm.,M RESOLUTION NO. CRA 26 -06 -219 A RESOLUTION OF THE SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ; ( SMCRA) AUTHORIZING A SMCRA BUDGET TRANSFER IN THE AMOUNT OF $382,559 FROM ACCOUNT NUMBERS 610- 1110 - 551 -99 -31 (MOBLEY BUILDING RENOVATION), 610 1110- 551 -99 -33 (BUSINESS 'START -UP), 610 - 1110 - 552 -31 -20 (COMMERCIAL REHAB), 610- 1110 - 553 -99 -30 (RESIDENTIAL REHAB) AND _610- 1110- 559 -34 50 (PART -TIME INTERN) TO ACCOUNT NUMBER 610- 1110 - 583- 61 -10` (LAND ACQUISITION) FOR THE PURPOSE OF PURCHASING` PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 6442 SW 591h PLACE, SOUTH MIAMI,; FLORIDA BEARING FOLIO NO.: 09- 4025 - 010 -0180' AND 6443 SW 60th AVENUE, SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA BEARING FOLIO NO.: 09- 4025 -010 0050; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, during the April 10, 2006 SMCRA Meeting, the Board approved a purchase and sale agreement between the South Miami CRA and Graham Hanover, Inc. to purchase 6442 SW 59th Place, South Miami, Florida, and 6443 SW 60th Avenue, South Miami, Florida for a total purchase price of $730,000; and WHEREAS, the current available funding in Account No. 610- 1110- 583- 61 -10, Land Acquisition is `$ 234,061.37; and WHEREAS, property taxes will continue to accrue on 6442 SW 59th Place and 6443 SW 60th Avenue until the purchase of the two properties is finalized by the SMCRA; and WHEREAS, in order to fund the purchase of the two properties, a <budget line item transfer in the amount of $382,559 will be required from the following budget line item accounts into Account No. 610- 1110 - 583- 61 -10, Land Acquisition: 610 -1110- 551 -99 -31 Mobley Building Renovation $210,000 610- 1110 - 551 -99 -33 Business Start-Up $30,000 610- 1110 - 552 -31 -20 Commercial Rehab $25,000 610 -1110- 553 -99 -30 Residential Rehab $100,000 610- 1110 - 559 -34 -50 Part-Time Intern $17,559; and WHEREAS, after budget transfer, the available funding in Account No. 610 1110- 583- 61 -10, Land Acquisition will be $616,620.37; and WHEREAS, after budget transfer, the available balances in the above referenced accounts will be: 610- 1110 - 551 -99 -31 Mobley Building Renovation $60,000 610 -1110- 551 -99 -33 Business Start-Up $10,000 61071110- 552 -31 -20 Commercial Rehab $25,000 610- 1110 - 553 -99 -30 Residential Rehab $27,500 610- 1110 - 559 -34 -50 Part-Time Intern $0; and _777" M-:-7,R 777177 ,.' 'I"r:x -' .'� F` �7' 'k� "t .aT -,'?, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY; Section 1. The South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency (SMCRA) approves a budget line item transfer in the total amount of $382,559 from the following budget line item accounts into Account No. 610- 1110- 583 -61 -10 Land Acquisition: 610= 1110 - 551 -99 -31 Mobley Building Renovation $210,000 6104110 - 551 -99 -33 Business Start-Up $30,000 610- 1110 - 552 -31 -20 Commercial Rehab $25,000 610- 1110 - 553 -99 -30 Residential Rehab $100,000 610- 1110 - 559 -34 -50 Part-Time Intern $17,559 Section 2. The SMCRA shall seek City of South Miami approval and subsequent approval from Miami -Dade County " fort he above referenced FY 05/06 budget amendment. Section 3. This; resolution shall take effect immediately upon approval. PASSED AND ADOPTED this "25TH day of May, 2006. ATTEST: APPROVED: SECRETARY CHAIRPERSON Board Vote: _ 7 -0 Chair Feliu: Yea Vice Chair Wiscombe: Yea READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: Member Palmer: Yea Member Birts: Yea Member Beckman: Yea Member Ellis: Yea Member Williams: Yea GENERAL COUNSEL E I 1 J:Wy Documents \CRA RESOLUTIONS 2006 \CRA Reso budget transfer (05 -25 -06 meeting).doc Sour South Miami o� bdftd q AR-Me icaNy NoRPORATEO CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 1927 OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER Rtv INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM 2001 To: The Honorable Mayor Feliu and Members of the City Commission Via: Yvonne S. McKinley, Acting City Manager From: Don O'Donniley, Planning Director Date: June 6, 2006 Subject: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA AUTHORIZING THE , SMCRA TO SEEK COUNTY APPROVAL FOR AN EXTENSION OF THE LIFE OF THE AGENCY FOR 'A TOTAL OF FIFTEEN YEARS; IN ADDITION TO ASKING THE COUNTY TO PLEDGE A MATCHING PORTION OF THEIR SHARE OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (TIF) REVENUES TO PARTIALLY RETIRE A $2,000,000 FINANCE BOND REQUIRED TO PURCHASE ALL REMAINING PROPERTIES TO IMPLEMENT THE MADISON SQUARE PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI TO PLEDGE A MATCHING PORTION OF THE CITY'S SHARE OF TIF REVENUES TO RETIRE THE REMAINING BALANCE OF THE $2,000,000 FINANCE BOND; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Request: On May 3, 2005, the Miami -Dade County Commission approved a fifteen year extension of the Agency contingent upon the SMCRA obtaining a project based, financing commitment by June 1, 2007. The conditions of approval stipulated that long -term financing be secured through a pledge of TIF revenues (See Exhibit 1). The key project identified in the SMCRA Plan Update is Madison Square, a proposed mixed -use affordable housing project at the north end of Church Street. The SMCRA currently owns several properties required for development and is negotiating for the purchase of all remaining properties. The projected cost to purchase the entire site is $2,640,048 (See Exhibit 2). The SMCRA intends to expedite purchase of two properties currently pending foreclosure for a purchase price of $730,000 leaving a balance of $1,910,048 required to purchase all remaining properties. Given an increase in land values, staff estimates a total of $2,000,000 will be required to purchase the remaining properties. Staff has recently submitted a request to Miami -Dade County for approval of a fifteen year extension of the Agency and a County pledge of TIF revenues to partially retire a $2,000,000 bond required to purchase all remaining properties. The SMCRA shall also pledge a matching portion of the City's TIF revenues to retire the bond. Staff anticipates an annual TIF payment of approximately $188,000 will be required to retire the bond over a fifteen year term (See Exhibit 3). Staff intends to seek approval from the SMCRA Board and the City Commission for a long -term bond financing agreement' upon completion of draft terms: Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution authorizing the SMCRA to seek Miami -Dade County approval for a fifteen' year extension of the Agency and a County pledge, of TIF revenues and a matching pledge of City of South Miami TIF revenues to retire a $2,000,000 financing bond to purchase all Madison Square properties. I Backup Documentation: Draft Resolution Approved Miami -Dade County Resolution #466 -05 Projected Land Acquisition Costs for Madison Square Draft fifteen year Amortization Table Approved SMCRA Resolution for Term Extension and TIF Pledge YSM /DOD /SD /JM E: \CC \SMCRA Budget Amendment.doc 1' RESOLUTION NO: 2 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONr OF THE 4 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE SMCRA TO 5 SEEK COUNTY APPROVAL FOR AN EXTENSION OF THE LIFE OF 6 THE AGENCY FOR A TOTAL OF FIFTEEN YEARS; IN ADDITION TO 7 ASKING THE COUNTY TO PLEDGE A MATCHING PORTION OF 8 THEIR SHARE OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (TIF) REVENUES TO 9 PARTIALLY RETIRE A $2,000,000 FINANCE BOND REQUIRED TO 10 PURCHASE ALL REMAINING PROPERTIES TO IMPLEMENT THE 11 MADISON SQUARE PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE SMCRA TO 12 PLEDGE A MATCHING PORTION OF THE CITY'S SHARE OF TAX 13 INCREMENT FINANCING REVENUES TO RETIRE THE REMAINING 14 BALANCE OF THE $2,000,000 FINANCE BOND; AND PROVIDING AN 15 EFFECTIVE DATE. 16 17 WHEREAS, on May 3, 2005, the Miami -Dade County Commission approved 18 Resolution No. 466 -05 amending the SMCRA Plan Update and extending the life of the SMCRA 19 for 15 years beyond the June' 1, 2005 sunset provision and mandating a sunset review within two 20 years of the approval, if no long. term ` financing agreement supported by TIF revenues is 21 completed by June 1, 2007; and, 22 23 WHEREAS, the SMCRA Plan Update contemplates construction of a mixed -use 24 housing project known as Madison Square; 25 26 WHEREAS, the SMCRA currently owns several of the required parcels' for development 27 of the project and is negotiating to purchase the remaining properties; and, 28 29 WHEREAS, the total projected cost required to purchase the entire development site is 30 $2,640,048; and, 31 32 WHEREAS, the SMCRA intends to immediately purchase two of the required` properties 33 currently pending foreclosure action for a purchase price of $730,000 leaving a balance of 34 1,910,048 required to purchase all remaining properties; and 35 36 WHEREAS, given the increase in land value over time,' the estimated total funding 37 amount required to purchase all remaining properties is $2,000,000;; and 38 39 WHEREAS, the SMCRA will seek Miami -Dade County approval for an extension of the 40 life of the Agency for a total of fifteen years; in addition to asking the County to pledge a 41 matching ;portion of their share of tax increment financing revenues to partially retire a 42 $2,000,000 financing bond required to purchase all remaining properties; and 43 44 WHEREAS, the City Commission authorizes a matching pledge of their portion of TIF 45 revenues to retire a $2,000,000 financing bond required to purchase all remaining properties; and 46 n.' ��= t?. �„ �. �a ;'�'^�s;�aF:.�a���.�;�aa•, =,i. ...x ,-�: , r`-" ��i-*, �aa;. rxm-^ t^ �„° r., �.' n° �' r' a�", �' P.,' R4a�.;„ ��;- ���, xa' as°. z[.,; �-° a���" F„ �; i'�'.'��'fi4'�:n;- ,�°`�r�'a}'� =' ` TTF l#Nil0Of�r �i` total � )f�r__,_-_ ^ fifteen 2 years will be required to retire the $2,000,000 financing bond; and 4 WHEREAS, given the availability of the Tax Increment Financing mechanism, it is not 5 required that the City of South Miami be principle to any current or future SMCRA bond 6 financing agreements. 9 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY 10 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA THAT: 12 Section 1. The above whereas clauses are incorporated by reference. 14 Section 2. The City Commission authorizes the SMCRA to seek County approval for 15 an exte n1sion of the life of the Agency for a total of fifteen years; in addition to asking the County 16 to pledge a portion of their share of matching tax increment financing revenues to partially retire 17 a $2,000,000 financing bond required to purchase all remaining properties required to develop 18 Madison Square. 20 Section 3. The City Commission, authorizes a matching pledge of the City's portion 21 of tax � increment financing revenues to retire the remaining balance of a $2,000,000 bond 22 required to purchase all remaining properties required to develop Madison Square. 24 Section 4. The SMCRA will seek subsequent approval from Miami-Dade County for 25 the above: referenced extension of the life of the SMCRA Agency and TIF revenue pledge. 27 Section 5. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. 30 PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of June, 2006. 33 ATTEST: APPROVED: 36 CITY CLERK MAYOR 38 Commission Vote: 39 Mayor Feliu: 40 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: Vice Mayor Wiscombe: 41 Commissioner Palmer: 42 Commissioner Birts: 43 CITY ATTORNEY Commissioner Beckman: 47 Extension (2).doc 0j, Legislative Matter Page 1 of 5 EXHIBIT 1 Miami -Dade Legislative Item • File Number 052419 .m File Number: 052419 File Type: Resolution Status Adopted as amended Version: 0 Reference: 466 -05 Control: County Commission File Name: CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI CRA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Introduced: 3/23/2005 Requester: Office of Community and Cost: Final Action: 5/3/2005 Economic Development Agenda Date: 5/3/2005 Agenda Item Number: 5L` Notes: THIS IS FINAL `Title: RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT TO VERSION AS REDEVELOPMENT PLAN OF SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY ADOPTED. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO EXTEND THE LIFE OFF THE ALSO SEE SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY LEG. #051035. ( SMCRA) FOR 15 YEARS BEYOND THE JUNE 1, 2005 SUNSET PROVISION OF THE.INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT, SUBJECT TO A NEW SUNSET PROVISION OF TWO YEARS, IF THE SMCRA FAILS TO OBTAIN A LONG -TERM FINANCING COMMITMENT SECURED THROUGH THE AGENCY'S TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (TIF) REVENUES; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY [SEE ORIGINAL ITEM UNDER FILE NO. 051035] Indexes: COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Sponsors: NONE Sunset Provision: No Effective Date: Expiration Date Registered Lobbyist: None Listed Legislative History Acting Body Date Agenda Item Action Sent To Due Returned Pass /Fail Date County Attorney 8/23/2005 Assigned Shannon D. Summerset Board of County 5/3/2005 5L Adopted as P Commissioners AMENDED amended REPORT: The Board adopted the foregoing proposed resolution as amended to require that the City of file -//C -\ T) ocuments %20and %20Settinf4s \Dstephen\ Desktop \CRA \Legislative %20Matter.htm 5/24/2006 I `-'"s: , �" "�-:" w':.u., . Legislative Matter Page 2 of 5 South Miami come back before the Board in two years to present along -term financing commitment plan secured through the Community Redevelopment Agency's tax increment - financing revenues for approval. Legislative Text TITLE RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT TO REDEVELOPMENT PLAN OF SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO EXTEND THE LIFE OF THE SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (SMCRA) FOR 15 YEARS BEYOND THE JUNE 1, 2005 SUNSET PROVISION OF THE 1NTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT, SUBJECT TO A NEW SUNSET PROVISION OF TWO YEARS, IF THE SMCRA FAILS TO OBTAIN A LONG -TERM FINANCING' COMMITMENT SECURED THROUGH THE AGENCY'S TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (TIF) REVENUES; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY BODY WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida enacted the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969 during its 1969 Legislative Session, which enactment is presently codified in the Florida Statutes as Part III of Chapter 163 as amended; and WHEREAS, the Act confers all redevelopment powers upon counties with home rule charters and authorizes such counties to delegate the exercise of such powers within the boundaries of a municipality to the governing body of such municipality; and WHEREAS, the City of South Miami (the "City) Commission, pursuant to County Ordinance No. 12- 97-1633 enacted on April 15, 1997, accepted a delegation of powers from the Board, found a need for and created the South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency "), declared the members of the City Commission to be the members of the Agency, granted the Agency the power to exercise all powers permitted by the Act which were delegated by the Board to the Agency and directed the initiation, preparation and adoption of a community redevelopment plan by the Agency; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance !98 -79 enacted by the Board on May 19, 1998, the County has among other things, approved and adopted the South Miami' Community Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan"); and WHEREAS, on September 9, 1999, the Board adopted Ordinance No. 99 -100, which approved the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement (the "Interlocal "), between the City of South Miami and Miami - Dade County; and - WHEREAS, on January 10, 2005 the adopted Resolution CRA -02 -05 -149 which approved the modification of the Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami on February 1, 2005; approved an Ordinance No. 01 -05 -1823 adopting a Phase II Plan supplement as updating and modifying the South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan and WHEREAS, the City and Agency desire, and have requested the County to approve an extension of the life of the SMCRA by 15 years beyond the June 1, 2005 sunset provision of the Agency's Interlocal Cooperation Agreement; and WHEREAS, the County must.grant authority to the Agency to continue its activities beyond the June 1, 2005 sunset period; and WHEREAS, this Board desires to approve this plan amendment and to accomplish the purposes outlined in the memorandum from the County Manager, a copy of which is incorporated in this resolution by reference; and WHEREAS, the Board desires to ensure that the Agency will secure within five years, the necessary ri irn \T,% --. „ „+ o /7I) r— Ao/ 7OO,, f}; nRc\ Tleta nhPn\ T) Pzictnn\CRA\T ,egislative %20Matterhtm 5 /24/2006 Legislative Matter Page 3 of 5 financial resources to fund the projects identified in the updated Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the Board desires to sunset the SMCRA if long term funding commitments pledging Tax Increment Financing revenues are not made within a 2 year period from June 1, 2005, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MIAMI -DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. that: Section 1. The matters contained in the foregoing recitals are incorporated in this resolution by reference. Section 2. The Board approves the plan amendment adopted by Agency and the City and extends the life of the Agency for a'period of fifteen (15) years to June 1, 2020, subject to the Agency securing long term funding commitments pledging Tax Increment Financing revenues by June 1, 2007 in order to implement said plan amendment. HEADER Date: ?929 To: Honorable Chairperson Joe A. Martinez, and Members, Board of County Commissioners " From: George M. Burgess County Manager Subject: Amendment to City of South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency Redevelopment Plan j a MANAGER'S BACKGROUND RECOMMENDATION as amended on May 3, 2005 It is recommended that the Board of County Commissioners (the `Board ") approve an amendment to Community Redevelopment Plan of the City of South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency ( SMCRA), extending the life of the SMCRA for 15 years beyond the June 1, 2005 sunset provision of the agency's Interlocal Agreement and providing for a sunset review within two (2) years of this extension, if no long -term financing agreement supported by Tax Increment Financing revenues is completed within the 2 -year period. STAFF RECOMMENDATION BACKGROUND The Board approved the Tax Increment Financing Project for the City of South Miami by ordinance No. 12 -97 -1633. An Interlocal Agreement was approved by the Board on September 9, 1999 (Resolution No. 99 -100), and was executed on June 1, 2000. An amendment to the Interlocafl Agreement, raising the administrative cap to 20%, was approved by the Board on March 16, 2004 (Resolution R- 327 -04). The agreement provided for an expiration date of 5 years from the date of execution unless the Board approves an extension after reviewing an update to the Community Redevelopment Plan. Board approval of this extension is requested prior to the expiration date of June L 2005: file //C \ Documents %20and %20Settings \Dstephen\ Desktop \CRA \Legislative %20Matter.htm 5/24/2006 Legislative Matter Page 4 of 5 In a letter dated December 22; 2004, (attached) the Mayor of the City of South Miami requested that the County extend the due date of December 1, 2004 for submission of the SMCRA redevelopment plan update, initially due six (6) months prior to the agreed upon termination date of June 1, 2005 - as established by the interlocal agreement between the County and City. It is within the power of the Board to accept the plan after the December 1, 2004 due date for receipt by County staff. A draft plan was received by County staff in December 2004. On January 10, 2005, the SMCRA Board adopted resolution 02 -05 -149 that among other things approved the modification of the Plan and authorized submission of the modified plan to the County for approval. On February 1, 2005 the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami passed, upon second` reading, an ordinance modifying the South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan and providing for its transmission to the County for approval. Honorable Chairperson Toe A. Martinez and Members, Board of County Commissioners Page 2 The SMCRA redevelopment plan as updated, provides a progress report on community redevelopment goals established in the initial 5 -year plan. Additionally, the updated redevelopment plan identified several major projects that were either initiated or planned that would require significant investment by the SMCRA. The Mobley Building a potential business incubator; SW 59th Place /Church Street Streetscape;project and Madison Square — a mixed use redevelopment project are examples of the signature activities that would require the SMCRA to identify financing resources for completion of these projects, and which were used as examples of future projects that justify extending the life of the SMCRA. Economic Impact Analysis The Agency's fiscal year 2004 -05 Tax Increment Revenues were $780,000. The Agency has been approved to receive only 50% of the Tax Increment Revenues available. This funding level applies equally to both the County and the City. After the effect of two major projects, the Valencia building an the Hometown Station, which would add approximately $200,000 annually to the Agency's revenues, an annual revenue growth rate of between 3% and 4.5% is anticipated over the next 15 years. The estimated contributions over 5 years are $3.0 million from the County and $3.7 million from the City. The estimated contributions over 15 years are $12.9 million from the County and $16.1 million from the City. The Tax Increment Financing Coordinating Committee at its March 10, 2005, met with the City of South Miami, and members of the SMCRA Board, to review the plan update and request for a 15 -year extension of the Community Redevelopment Agency. The TIFC Committee voted to recommend approval of the SMCRA Redevelopment Plan update that extends the life of the CRA for 15 years, with a five (5) year sunset provision if the SMCRA does not complete a significant financing transaction involving TIF revenue pledge within the five (5) year period. ]o• //% \ Tlnriimantc0 /7O- gn,10 /„2nSPttings \Dstenhen\ Desktop \CRA \Legislative %20Matterhtm 5/24/2006 Legislative Matter Page 5 of 5 Tony E. Crapp, Sr. Assistant County Manager Amended Agenda Item No. 5(L) Page No. 3 Amended Approved Mayor Agenda Item No. 5(L) Veto 5-3-05 Override - - -__- -------- ------ Home Agendas I Minutes I Legislative Search I Lobbyist Registration Legislative Reports 2006 BCC Meetina Calendar I Miami-Dade County Code of Ordinances Home I Using Our Site I About I Phone Directory I Privacy I Disclaime E-mail your comments, questions and suggestions to Webmaster Web Site C 2006 Miami-Dade County. All rights reserved. f;l-.//('.\T'in,,,iimpntqO/�')()nnri0/�?.f),P,e,t.t.ing.-,\D.-,teT)hen\DesktOD\CRA\Legislative`/`2OMatter.htm 5/24/2006 mwrw� EXHIBIT 2 qmmmr �4 -?F_`,e3S�y#+r*#g"Y�`^try'.F'C� �..F#tf',C'd�-iy,'.!�yy��kU_?'" 'K, r w5- 'C l.?+ "k-' ". F {h t`.F' y i ?- Zonin" > • Value ,� Prope T pe ... TARGET,EQ PROPERTIES MADISON,SQUARE, . . .Property , 6411 SW 59th Place - 09 -4025- 010 -0290 (Franklin (1) Sub PB`5 -34 North 112 of Lot 28, Blk 5) 2750 NR $8,000 Vacant Land 6415 SW 59th Place 09- 4025- 010 -0300 (Franklin (2) Sub PB 5- 34South 112 of Lot 28, Blk 5) 2750 NR $38,500 Vacant Land `6433 SW 59th Place (Miller Appraisal) 09- 4025 - 010 -0320 (Franklin Sub PB 5 -34 Lot 30, Blk (3) 5) 5500 NR $450,000 Vacant Land 'x6429 SW 59th Place 09 -4025- 010 -0310 See Combined (Franklin Sub PB 5 -34 Lot 29 BLK 5) 09- Purchase Price 4025 -010 -0320 (Franklin Sub PB 5 -34 Lot 30 BLK Listed Above For Properties 3 and '4 Improved p (4) 5) 5500 NR Property *6415 SW 60th Avenue 09- 4025 -010 -0030 Improved (5) (Franklin Sub P13 5 -34 Lot 2'Less W2.5 Ft BLK 1) 5875 NR $285,000 Property *6443 SW 60th Avenue (Appraisal Group) 09- 4025- 010 -0050 (Franklin Sub PB 5 -34 Lot 4 Less Improved (6) W2.5 Ft For R!W BLK 1) 5875 RM -24 $730,000 Property See Combined *6442 SW 59th Place 09-4025-010-0180 (Franklin Purchase Price Listed Above For Properties _Improved (7) Sub PB 5 -34 Lot 17 Less E27.5 Ft. BLK 3 4625 NR 6 and 7 Property 6420 SW 59th `Place (Miller Appraisal) 09- 4025- 010 -0160 (Franklin Sub PB 5 -34 South 1/2 (8) Lot, Less R/W BLK 3) 2203 NR $30,800 Vacant Land SW 59th Place Between 64th Street and 66th Street 09- 4025 - 010 - 0181 (Franklin Sub PB 5 -34 (9) Pare 20-19 AKA E 27.5 Ft. of Lot 17 BLK' 3) 1375 NR $19,000 Vacant Land SW'59th' Place Between 64th Street and 66th Street 09 -4025- 010 -01.91 (Franklin Sub PB 5 -34 (10) 11 Parc 20 -19 AKA E 27.5 Ft. of Lot 18 BLK 3) 1375 NR $19,000 Vacant Land qmmmr West Side of 59th Place 094025- 010 -0170 (frankln Sub P6 5 -34 Lo 16 Less R/W BL K3) (11 ) (100' South of SW 64th Street) 4628 NR $64,800 Vacant Land 6457 SW 60th Avenue 09- 4025 - 010 -0060 (Franklin Improved (12) Sub PB 5 -34 Lot 5 Less W 2.5 Ft. BLK 1) 5875 RS -4 $200,000 Property 6429 SW 60th Avenue 09 -4025- 010 -0040 (Franklin Improved (13) Sub PB 5 -34 Lot 3 Less 2.6 Ft. for'RM BLK 1) 5875 NR $320,000 Property 6412 SW 59th Place 09-025-010-015 ran in Sub PB 5 -34 N 112 of Lot & Port of Lot 14 Desc Beg 35 FTE & 20 FTs of NW Cor of Lot 14 TH E 15.6 FT. Sely AD 42.44 FT. W 42.93 Ft N30 FT. To Improved (14 ) POB BILK 3) 3143 NR $135,000 Property 6450 SW 59th Place 09 -4025- 010 -0190 (Franklin Improved (15) Sub PB 5 -34 Lot 18 Less E27.50 Ft BILK 3) 4625 NR $96,000 Property TOTAL 61974 Properties under contract to be purchased by the SMCRA. N�'`2���.>r�ts'.�Q � SMCRA OIN0 IED►RGE4,S) $91,100 . . 9. T, „.',& >x', , � .oF .,'S atanv..+a,, - ,� �.{�... Yry '"+; yid, �� r'� '�'k"j``K�F, t. �`,�.�l`? - 1 :'�i ���T �AAPPRAISED�VALI�Et 1. #* 3 'f '� {4� E a 14`! pia F ,.'Y'w 4.uw krk PROJEGTED LAND VALUE Appraised VaWe MultipLed bythe Percentage Increase Above appraised Vaiue Pald by the SMCRA for Properties 3 4,5,6 and 7 . - West Side of 59th Place 094025- 010 -0170 (frankln Sub P6 5 -34 Lo 16 Less R/W BL SouthMiami CRALoan $2MM Amortization Table 05 25 2006 (2) Sample Amortization Table (City of South Miami CRA) - -15 Years EXHIBIT 3 Initial Data LOAN DATA ` TABLE DATA Loan amount: $2,000,000.00 Table starts at date: Annual interest rate: 4.83% or at payment number: 1 Term in years: 15 Payments per year 4 Total Cash Outlay: First payment due 10/1/2006 PERIODIC PAYMENT Entered payment: The table uses the calculated periodic payment amount Calculated payment: $47,046.13 unless you enter a value for "Entered payment ".. CALCULATIONS Use payment of: $47,046.13 Beginning balance at payment 1: 2;000,000.00 1st payment in table: 1 Cumulative interest prior to payment 1: 0.00 Table Payment Beginning Page 1 Ending ° Cumulative No. Date Balance Interest Principal Balance Interest 1 10/1/2006 2,000,000.00 24,150.00 22,896.13 1,977,103.87 24,150.00 2 1/1/2007 1,977,103.87 23,873.53 23,172.60 1,953,931.27 48,023.53 3 4/1/2007 1,953,931;27 23,593.72 23,452.41 1,930,478.86 71,617.25 4 7/9/2007 1,930,478:86 23,310.53 23,735.60 1,906,743.26 94,927.78 5 10/1/2007 1,906,743.26 23,023.92 24,022.20 1,882,721.06 117,951.71 6 1/1/2008 1,882,721.06 22,733.86 ` 24,312.27 1,858,408.79 140,685.56 7 4/1/2008 1,858,408.79 22,440.29 24,605.84 1,833,802.95 163,125.85 8 7/1/2008 1,833,802.95 22,143.17 24,902.96 1,808,899.99 185,269.02 9 10/1/2008 1,808,899.99 21,842.47 25,203.66 1,783,696.32 207,111.49 10 1/1/2009 1,783,696.32 21,538.13 25,508.0V 1,758,188.33 228,649.62 11 4/11/2009 1,758,188.33 21,230.12 25,816.01 1,732,372.32 249,879:74 12 7/1/2009 1,732,372.32 20,918.40 26,127.73 1,706,244.59 270,798.14 13 10/1/2009 1,706,244.59 20,602.90 261443.23 1,679,801.36 291,401.04 14 1/1/2010 1,679,801.36 20,283.60, 26,762.53 1,653,038.84 3`11,684'65 15 4/1/2010 1,653,038.84 19,960.44 27,085.69 1,625,953.15 331,645.09 16`', 7/1/2010 1,625,953.15 19,633.38 27,412.74 1,598,540.41 351,278.47 17 10/1/2010 1,598,540.41 19,302.38; 27,743.75 1,570,796.65 370,580.85 18 1/1/201'1 1,570,796,65 18,967.37 ' 28,078.76 1,542,717.89 389,548.22 19 4/1 /2011' 1,542,717.89: 18,628.32 28, 417.81 1,5114,300.08: 4081176.54 20 7/1/2011 1,514,300:08 18,285.17 , 28,760.96 1,485,539.13 426,461.71 21 10/1/2011 1,485,539.13 17,937.88 29,10824 1,4,56,430.88 444,399.60 22 1/1/2012 1,456,430.88 17,586.40 29,459.73 1,426,971.16 461,986.00 23 4/112012 1,426,971.16 17,230.68 29,815.45 1,397,155.70 479,216.68 24` 7/1/2012 1,397,155:70 16,870.66 30,175.47 1,366,980.23 496,087.33 25 10/1/2012 1,366,980 °.23 16,506.29 30,539.84 11336,440.39 512,593.62 26 1/1/2013 1,336,440,39 16,137.52 30,908.61 1,305,531,78 528,731.13 27 4/1/2013 1 1,305,531!78 ` 15,764.30 1 31,281.83 1,274,249.94 544,495.43 Page 1 SouthMiami CRALoan $2MM Amortization Table 05 25 2006 (2) 28 7/1/2013 1,274,249.94 15,386.57 31,659.56 1,242,590.38 559,882.00 29 10/1/2013' 1,242,590.38 15,004.28 32,041.85 1,210,548.53 574,886.28 30 1/1/2014 1,210,548.53 14,617.37 32,428.76 1,178,119.78 589,503.65 31 4/1/2014 1,178,119.78 14,225.80 32,820.33 1,145,299.44 603,729.45 32 7/,1/2014 1,145,299.44 13,829.49 33,216.64 1,112,082.80 617,558.94 33 10/1/2014 1,112,082.80 13,428.40 33,617.73 1,078,465.07 630,987.34 34 1/1/2015 1,078,465.07 13,022.47 34,023.66 1,044,441.41 644,009.80 35 4/1/2015 1,044,441.41 12,611.63 34,434.50 1,010,006.91 656,621.43 36 7/1/2015 1,010,006.91 12,195.83 34,850.30 975,156.62 668,817.27' 37 10/112015 975,156.62 11,775.02 35,271.11 939,885.50 680,592.28 38 111/2016 939,885.50 11;349.12 35,697.01 904,188.49 691,941.40 39 4/1/2016 904,188,49 10;918.08 36,128.05 868,060.44 702,859.48 40 7/1/2016 868,060.44 10,481.83 36,564.30 831,496.14 713,341.31 41 10/1/2016 831,496.14 10,040.32 37,005.81 794,490.33 723,381.62 42 1/1/2017 794,490.33 9,593.47 37,452.66 757,037.67 732,975.09 43 /2017 757,037.67 9,141.23 37, 904.90 719,132.77 742,116.32 44, 7/112017 719,132.77 8,683.53'' 38,362.60 680,770.17 750,799.85 45 10/1/2017 680,770.17 8,220.30 38,825.83 641,944,34 759,020.15 46, 1/1/2018 641,944.34 7,751.48 39,294.65 602,649.69 766,771.63, 47 4/1/2018 602,649.69 7,276.99 ` 39,769.13 562,880.55 774,048.62 48 7/1/201`8 562,880.55 6,796.78 40,249.35 522,631.21 780,845.41 49 10/1/2018 522, 631.21 6,3101.77,;:1 ' 40, 735.36 481, 895.85 787,156.18 50; 481,895.85 5,818.89' 41,227.24 440,668.61 792,975.07 51 4/1/2019 440,668.61 5,321.07 41,725.06 398,943.56 798,296.14 52 7/1/2019 398,943.56 4,817.24 42,228.89 356,714;67 803,113.39 53 10/1/2019 356,714.67 4,307.33 42,738.80 313,975.87 807,420.72 54 111/2020 313,975.87 3,791.26 43,254.87 270,721.00 811,211.98 55' 4/1/2020 270,721.00 3,268.96' 43,777.17 226,943.83 814,480.93 56 7/1/2020 226,943.83 2,740.35' 44,305.78 182,638.04 817,221.28 57, 182,638.04 2,205.35 44,840.77 137,797.27 819,426.63 58 1/1/2021 137,797.27 1,663.90' 45,382.23 92,415.04 821,090.53 59 4/1/2021 92,415.04 1,115.91' 45,930.22 46,484.82 822,206.45 60 7/1/2021 46,484.82 561.30 46,484.82 0.00 ` 822,767.75 Estimated Annual Payment on Loan:; $188,184.52 Quarterly Payment Requirement on Loan: $47,046;13 Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. CRA 27 -06 -220 A'RESOLUTION OF THE SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ( SMCRA) AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO SEED COUNTY APPROVAL FOR AN EXTENSION OF THE LIFE OF THE AGENCY FOR A TOTAL OF FIFTEEN YEARS; IN ADDITION TO ASKING THE COUNTY TO PLEDGE A MATCHING PORTION OF THEIR SHARE OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING REVENUES TO PARTIALLY RETIRE A $2,000,000 FINANCE BOND REQUIRED TO PURCHASE ALL REMAINING PROPERTIES TO IMPLEMENT THE MADISON SQUARE PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE SMCRA TO PLEDGE A MATCHING PORTION' OF THE CITY'S SHARE OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING REVENUES TO RETIRE THE REMAINING BALANCE OF THE $2,000,000 FINANCE BOND; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on May 3, 2005, the Miami -Dade County Commission approved Resolution No. 466 -05 .amending the plan ' and extending the life of the SMCRA for 15 years beyond the June 1, 2005 sunset provision and providing for a` sunset review within two years of the extension, if no long term financing agreement ; supported by tax increment financing revenues is completed by June 1, 2007; and, WHEREAS, the SMCRA's amended plan was adopted on by the. County Commission on May 5, 2005 via Resolution No. R- 466 -05, and contemplates the construction of a mixed -use development project known as Madison Square; WHEREAS, the SMCRA currently owns several of the required parcels for development of the project and is negotiating to purchase the remaining properties; and, WHEREAS, the total projected cost to purchase the entire' development site is $2,640,048 and, WHEREAS, the SMCRA intends to initially purchase two of the required properties for development which are currently pending foreclosure action for a total purchase price of $730,000 leaving a balance of $1,910,048 required to purchase the remaining properties; and, WHEREAS, given an anticipated increase in land value over time, staff estimates a total of $2,000,000 will be required to purchase the remaining properties WHEREAS, The SMCRA will seek to gain Miami -Dade County approval for an extension of the life of the Agency for a total of fifteen years; in addition to asking the County to pledge a matching portion of their share of tax increment financing revenues to partially retire the bond amount of $2,000,000 required to purchase the remaining properties; and WHEREAS, The SMCRA shall authorize a pledge of their matching portion of tax increment financing revenues required to retire the total remaining balance of the $2,000,000 bond required to purchase the remaining properties; and ,'":'; WHEREAS, given the existence of the tax increment financing mechanism, it is not required that the City of South Miami become a principle participant in any future bond financing agreements. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA THAT: Section 1. The above whereas clauses are incorporated by reference. Section 2. The South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency ( SMCRA) authorizes the Executive Director to seek County approval for an extension of the life of the Agency for 'a total of fifteen years; in addition to asking the County to pledge a portion of their share of matching tax increment financing revenues to partially retire the bond amount of $2,000,000 required to purchase the remaining properties to develop Madison Square. Section 3 ` The South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency ( SMCRA) authorizes a pledge of the City's portion of matching tax increment financing revenues to retire the remaining balance of a $2,000,000 bond required to purchase the remaining properties to develop Madison, Square. Section 4. ' The SMCRA shall seek City of South' Miami approval and subsequent approval from Miami -Dade County'. for the above referenced extension of the life of the SMCRA Agency and TIF revenue pledge Section 5 This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of May, 2006. ATTEST: APPROVED: SECRETARY CHAIRPERSON Board Vote: 6 -1 Chair Feliu: Yea Vice Chair Wiscombe: Yea READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: Member Palmer Yea Member Birts: Yea Member Beckman: Nay Member Ellis: Yea Member Williams: Yea GENERAL COUNSEL JAN4y Documents \CRA RESOLUTIONS 2006 \CRA Reso - TIF Pledge and Extension (05 -25 -06 meeting).doc i MOM, Soul' South Miami CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 1927 INCORPORATED OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER ° R`p INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM 2001 To: The Honorable Mayor Feliu and Members of the M mission -Via: Yvonne S. McKinley, Actin City Manager y g y a _g From: Don O'Donniley, Planning Director Date: June 6, 2006 ITEM No Subiect: AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO A REQUEST TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE' BY PLACEMENT OF A CS -OV, COMMUNITY SERVICE OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT ON LOTS 7, 8, 27, 28, 29 AND 30 BLOCK A OF RESUBDIVISION OF BLOCKS 3 & 4 OF THE TOWNSITE OF LARKINS LOCATED AT 5974 SW 66th STREET AND 5977 SW 66th TERRACE OVER THE EXISTING RS -4 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT FOR THESE PROPERTIES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Request: The applicant is requesting a'rezoning of six !lots which are part of 12 tots owned by the Higher Praise & Worship Center, South Miami Church of God of Prophecy which is located at 6600 SW`59th Place. The rezoning request is to place the Community Service Overlay District zone over the six lots which would result in all of the church's property on this block being of the same zoning, RS -4 (CS -OV). The purpose of the rezoning is to allow the additional lots to be used for church purposes as defined in the Land Development Code The applicant, Higher Praise & Worship Center, South Miami Church of God of Prophecy qualifies as a community -based service provider as defined in the LDC Section 20 -9.4 and is eligible to apply for the placement of the CS -OV zoning district on property owned by the church. The applicant has not set forth a specific development plan for the subject properties undergoing rezoning. It can be anticipated that a major portion of these lots will be used for off- street parking. The proposed zoning change is compatible with the existing zoning pattern and with other uses in the immediate neighborhood. The Planning Board at its May 9 2006 meeting adopted a motion by a vote of 5 ayes 0 nays recommending approval of the zone change. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Higher Praise & Worship Center, South Miami Church of God of Prophecy request to change zoning be approved, subject to the submission of a Unity of Title, as required by Section 20- 9.11 of the LDC. Backup Documentation: Proposed Ordinance Application Letter' of Intent Location map Property ,survey Section 20 -9, LDC Planning Board Excerpt 5/9/o6 Public notices DOD /Sit: \Comm Items\2006 \6- 6- 06 \CS -OV CM Cover report.doc 1 ORDINANCE NO, 2 3 4 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH 5 MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO A REQUEST TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP 6 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY PLACEMENT OF A 7 CS -OV, COMMUNITY SERVICE OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT ON LOTS 7, 8, 27, 28, 29 8 AND 30 BLOCK A OF RESUBDIVISION OF BLOCKS 3 & 4 OF THE TOWNSITE OF 9 LARKINS'LOCATED AT 5974 SW 66' STREET AND 5977 SW '66' TERRACE OVER THE 10 EXISTING RS -4 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT FOR THESE 11 PROPERTIES; 'PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES` IN 12 CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 13 14 15 WHEREAS, Application No. PB -06 -012 was submitted to the Planning Department by the " 16" Higher Praise & Worship Center, South Miami Church of God of Prophecy said application requesting to 17 amend City's Official Zoning Map and Sections 20 -9.1 and 20 -9.3 of the Land Development Code to 18 " include in the Community Service Overlay District properties legally described > as Lots 7, 8, 27, 28, 29 19 and 30, Block A of the Re- subdivision of the Townsite of Larkins from RS -4 to RS- 4(CS -OV) ; 20 21 WHEREAS, after review and consideration, the Planning and Zoning Department recommended 22 approval of the application; and 23 24 WHEREAS, on May 9, 2006, after Public Hearing regarding the proposed amendment to the 25 Community Service Overlay District, Sections 20 -9.1 and 20 -9.3 of the Land Development Code, and to 26 the City's Official Zoning Map, the Planning Board approved the application by a vote of (5 -0); and 27 28 WHEREAS, the City Commission desires to accept the recommendation of the Planning Board 29 and enact the aforesaid amendment. 30 31 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION 32 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: 33 34 Section 1 That Section 20 -9.3, entitled Community Service Overlay District Boundaries of the 35 South Miami Land Development Code' is hereby amended to read as follows: 36 37 Section 20 -9.3 Boundaries. 38 39 The properties in the Community Service (CS) overlay zoning district shall be delineated on the City's 40 Official Zoning Map with the symbol "CS -OV" and shown as darkened areas in Figure ,20 -9.1. the 41 properties are legally described as follows: 42 43 : Lots 7, 8 and 12 of Block 1, PINES SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in 44 Plat Book 13 at Page 2 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; and, Lots 31, 32 and 33 of 45. Block 5, Lots 34, 35 and 36 of Block 6, and the alley lying between Lots 34 and 35, Lot 40, less 46 the west 15 feet thereof, Lots 41, 42, 43, 44 45 and 46 of Block 7, and 4 feet of the alley lying 47 south and adjacent to Lot 46, Lots 70 and 71 of Block 12, and Lot 87 of Block 15 and 7 1/2 feet 48 of the alley lying west and adjacent to Lot 87, less roadway dedications, FRANKLIN 49 SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 5 at Page 35 of the Public 50 Records of Dade County, Florida; and, Lots 1, 2, 3,;4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 125 13, 25, md 265 27, 51 28, 29 and 30, Block A, RE- SUBDIVISION OF TOWNSITE OF LARKINS, according to the 52 plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 4 at Page 1 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; 7171 1- e�,�,r"_' 2 1 and, Lots 12,13 and 14 of Block 2, TOWNSITE OF LARKINS SUBDIVISION, according to the 2 plat, thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 2 at Page '105 of the Public Records of Dade County, 3 Florida; and, the North 1/2 of Lot 5, Lots 6, 7,; 8, 9, 10, 11 12 and 13 of Block 2 and Lots 4 5, 6 4 and 7 of Block 4, less roadway dedications, AMENDED PLAT OF HAMLET, according to the 5 plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 4 at Page 48 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; 6 and,; East 50 feet of West 200 Feet of North 105.50 feet of East 1/ of Northwest 1/4 of Southeast 1/4 7 Less Streets, Section 25- 54 -40, Dade County, Florida; and East 50 feet of West 150 feet of North 8 105.50 feet of East 1/2 of Northwest 1/4 of Southeast 1/4 Less Streets, Section 25- 54 -40, Dade 9 County, Florida; and, East 50 feet of West 100 feet of North 105.50 feet of East 1/2 of Northwest 10 1/4 of Southeast 1/4 Less Streets, Section 25- 54 -40, Dade County, Florida; and West 50 feet of 11 North 105.50 feet of East %2 or'Northwest 1/4 of Southeast 1/4 Less Streets, Section 25- 54 -40, Dade 12 County, Florida. 13 14 Section 2. That the City's Official Zoning Map, as provided for in Section 20- 3.1(C) of the Land 15 Development Code and the CS -OV location map identified as ':Figure 20 -9.1 shall be amended by 16 changing the zoning on properties legally identified as properties legally described as Lots 7, 8, 27, 28, 29 17 and 30, Block A of the Resubdivision of the Townsite of Larkins from "RS -4," Single Family Residential 18 to "RS- 4(CS -OV) ", Single Family Residential, Community Service Overlay District. 19 20 Section 3. The approval of the >CS -OV zone change shall be subject to the applicant providing a 21 Unity of Title as required by LDC Section 20 -9.11. 22 23 Section 4.' If any section, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held 24 invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, this holding shall not affect the validity of 25 the remaining portions of this ordinance. 26 27 Section 5.. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance 28 are hereby repealed. 29 30 Section 6. This ordinance shall be effective immediately after the adoption hereof. 31 32 PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 2006 33 34 ATTEST: APPROVED: 35 36 37 38 - CITY CLERK MAYOR 39 40 1st Reading — 41 2nd Reading — 42 COMMISSION VOTE: 43 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mayor Feliu: 44 Vice Mayor Wiscombe: 45 Commissioner Palmer: 46 CommissionerBirts: 47 Commissioner' Beckman: 48 CITY ATTORNEY 49 50 NOTE: New wording underlined 52 53 E: \Comm Items\2006 \6- 6- 06\LDC Amend -CS-OV Ordinance.doc 4 So U South Miami o �r A114medca City F ' ' U • INCORPORATED • 1927 C, O R 11D A 2001 City of South Miami To: Honorable Chair & Planning Date: May 9, 2006 Board Members; From: Don O'Donniley Re: LDC Rezoning: RS -4 to RS -4 Planning Director (CS -OV): 5974 SW 66th Street, 5977 SW 66"' Terrace (A) PB -06 -012 Applicant: Higher Praise & Worship Center, South Miami Church of God of Prophecy Address: 5974 SW 6e Street, 5977 SW 66"' Terrace AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO A REQUEST TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI LAND" DEVELOPMENT CODE BY PLACEMENT OF A CS -OV, COMMUNITY SERVICE OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT ON LOTS 7,8,27,28,29 AND 30 BLOCK A OF RESUBDIVISION OF BLOCKS 3 & 4 OF THE TOWNSITE OF LARKINS LOCATED AT 5974 SW' 66 h STREET, 5977 SW 66`b TERRACE OVER THE EXISTING RS -4 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT FOR THIS PROPERTY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE SUMMARY OF REQUEST The applicant is requesting a rezoning of six lots which are part of twelve lots owned by the Higher Praise & Worship Center, South Miami Church of God of Prophecy which is located at 6600 SW 59"' Place. The rezoning request is to place the Community Service Overlay District zone over the six lots which would result in all of the church's' property on this block being of the same zoning, RS -4 (CS -OV). The purpose of the rezoning is to allow the additional lots to be used for church purposes as defined in the Land Development Code. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The Community. Service Overlay District, which is Article IX (Section 20 -9) of the Land- Development Code, was adopted in 1997 by the City Commission in order to provide a method whereby community —based service organizations could respond to special needs of the community (Charrette Too! Study Area). LDCRezoning CS -OV May 9, 2006 Page 2 of 3 The technique developed was an overlay zone, which allows for additional uses that are not permitted or provided for in the underlying single- family use districts. The overlay zone allows for a number of uses, such as churches, temples, community residential homes, and day care centers, as permitted uses, and other uses such as ACLF's, funeral homes, and schools as special uses requiring public hearings before the Planning Board and City Commission. The purpose of the district as defined in Section 20 -9.1 is as follows: "to provide for the special needs of community -based service providers and, specifically, to permit parking lot improvements, out parcel development, day care center facilities and building additions for those properties under the sole ownership of community -based service providers, such as churches, mosques, synagogues, or temples. « This section (Article IX) provides a list of permitted and special uses, specific parking standards and dimensional standards, including building height and setbacks. A copy of these regulations are attached to this report. SITE ANALYIS In 1997, at the time the Community Service Overlay District was created, all of the church's property at that time ( Lots 1 -6) were placed in the overlay district. The applicant's current rezoning site consists of Lots 7,8,27,28,29 and 30, Block A of the Re- subdivision of the Townsite of Larkins. Two of the lots face SW 66th Street and four lots face SW 66th Terrace. Four of the six lots are vacant. There is an existing single family residence on Lots 27 and 2 The following is a zoning and use analysis for the properties surrounding the lots to be rezoned site: Zonin Existine Use North RS-4,Single Family Residential Single family homes West RS -4 (CS -OV) Single family home and a Church South RM -18 Low Density Multi Family Two story Apartment Complex (HUD) East RS -4, Single family Residential Vacant lots, church, apartment building STAFF OBSERVATIONS 1) The applicant Higher Praise & Worship Center, South Miami Church of God of Prophecy qualifies as a community- based service provider as defined in the LDC Section 20 -9.4 and is LDC Rezoning CS OV May 9, 2006 Page 3 of 3 eligible to apply for the placement of the CS -OV 'zoning district on property owned by the church. 2) The applicant has not set forth a specific development plan for the :subject properties undergoing rezoning. It can be anticipated that a major portion of these lots will be used for off- street parking. The CS -OV regulations require a number of potential uses (schools, ACLF's, group homes, funeral homes, counseling; services) to obtain approval through a separate special use application process. A' detailed review of the applicant's site plan would be part of the special use approval process. 3) The proposed zoning change is compatible with the existing zoning pattern and with other uses in the immediate neighborhood. SPECIFIC AMENDMENT The placement of a CS -OV zoning district on the applicant's property is accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance amending the Land Development Code. The ordinance will a) modify Section 20 -9.3, Boundaries, by including the written legal description of the six lots; b) modify the boundary map Figure 20 =9.1, to include the subject property parcels; c) Amend the City's Official Zoning Map by changing the zoning on the six lots from "RS -4" to "RS -4 (CS -OV)'. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Higher Praise & Worship ;Center, South Miami Church of God of Prophecy request to change zoning of Lots 7,8,27,28,29 and 30, Block A of the Re-subdivision of the Townsite of Larkins from RS -4 to RS- 4(CS -OV) be approved, subject to the submission of a Unity of Title, as required by Section 20 -9.11 of the LDC. Attachments: Application Letter of Intent Location map Property survey Section 20 -9, LDC Public notices; DOD /SAY E:\PB\PB Agendas Staff Reports\2006 Agendas Staff Reports\5- 9- 06\PB -06 -012 Rezoning to CS- OV.doc City -of- South Miami { 11,J i Planning & Zoning Department f ApA Cl*a 30 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida 33143 Telep one: (305)'663 -6326; Fax: '(305) 666 -4591 ' J Application For Public Hearing Before Planning Board &; City Commission' Address of Subject Property: (o 6, /V LV 5 q Lot(s) X2 x Block Subdivision I X49 ra n't , �� �3 � 4 3 PB = Meets & Bounds: Applicant: 4 160 W=/G LO /Sig f'WO2Sft Phone: 3 D d i -lyr*A .� cc)��r�/ f�/ ~r, Cr V& --i4A �C�D 0?1 Representative: P R rY e- t� C P- ,/;f 1{,q -177 Organization: H- 1G A1,r 1?- 0121916�6 V,000ics'i4lo lo �j �' cv fz '�L f46 �=- C i=ce Address: Phone: Property Owner: 14161 -145,12 , t5 # 1v4�25Et��' cC Signature: � J GyK ,t=/2 .4yc.4) c+ur1+ r»i.c � C VcczFf o Mailing Address: CP G WO � w X5,3 < /�l�c x; Cc� � l t 007", ;31,4 3 p c Phone: 3 S - 2 � 4 - 7 >R g Architect/Engineer: Phone: AS THE APPLICANT, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO THIS PROJECT: Owner .Owner's Representative Contract to purchase _Option to purchase Tenant/Lessee APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE FOR THE FOLLOWING: SUBMITTED MATERIALS PLEASE CHECK THE APPROPRIATE ITEM: PLEASE CHECK ALL THAT APPLY: - Text Amendment to'LDC Variance Letter of intent Zoning Map Amendment — Special Use — Justifications for change PUD Approval — Special Exception — Statement of hardship PUD Major Change —Other Proof of ownership or letter from owner — _✓ Power of attorney Briefly explain application and cite specific Code sections: —Contract to purchase V Current survey (1 original sealed and signed/1 reduced copy @ 11 "x 17 ') _ 15;copies of Site Plan and Floor Plans C�Lc- cr,�r�v Zc.�✓ duce — 20% Property owner signatures �rl ai ing a e s sets) and 'map u l Section: Subsection: Page #: Amended Date: - -Required Feels b Y ». The undersigned has read this completed application and represents that the information and all submitted materials' are true and correct to the best of the applicant's knowledge and belief. Applicant'` Signature and title Date' Upon receipt, applications and all submitted materials will be reviewed for compliance with the Land Development Code and other applicable regulations. Applications found not in compliance will be rejected and returned to the applicant. OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Filed Date of PB Hearing Date of Commission Petition Required Petition Accepted Method of Payment 8/2/00 0 AS .. HIGHER PRAISE & WORSHIP CENTER INC. SOUTH MIAIW CHURCH OF GOD OF PROPHECY Senior Pastor 6610 S.W. 59" Place Hm. (305) 251 -6603 Pansy Graham South Miami, Fl. 33143 Church (305) 284 -9787 April 5 h, 2006 Planning And Zoning Dept. , City of South Miami 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Fl. 33143 Sir/Madam Higher Praise & Worship Center Inc. South Miami Church of God of Prophecy, is applying for rezoning of Lots 1 through 8 and 27 through 30 Block A of "Resubdivision of Blocks 3 &4 of Townsite of Larkins ", included in the Overlay District We are being asked to submit a fee in the amount of $4,000.00 with this application, which we are unable to afford. We are therefore asking for a waiver of this fee of $4,000.00. The Church has served this Community from its present location for over 50 years, reaching out to the Community through spiritual' guidance, youth programs and various community outreach endeavors. It is in the interest of our continued service that we are applying for rezoning. I trust that our request will be favorably considered. Respectfully, Pansy Graham, Pastor. City of South Miami PB -06 -012 Higher Praise & Worship Center / South Miami Church of God of Prophecy Change of Zoning to Community Service Overlay Zone (CS -OV) 5974 SW 66th Street / 5977 SW 66th Terrace 59 M °D 6412 6415 6420 6415 6412 co, rn o - o o 4 o 6429 6429 6428< 6443 N CD to CD 6443 '; 6442 6443 6442 6445 6457 6450 6456 6461 6 ��� 6124 6100 _ 4 CD m 6420 6471 " 0 6105 ``� 6487 ° 6481 6500 ° N 6505 6500 6501 6518 to 6516 U r6533 6532 ss 6135 C0 6551 6571 L1.1 > D 5987 6540 6591 Q O o m SW 66TH ST CD 04 o o 6600 6601 CD ILO 66Q1 C C to m m m N C 02 5963 6647 L' Lo CD '-i co CD co CD dg6� 6669 rn C14 m M . Lo / m M 590 SUBJECT SW 67TH ST PROPERTIES m o :co 5949 CD SW 68TH ST SW 68TH ST 5950 m . o J a w o M f n- Ln CD 665 SW 69TH ST 6140 0 o 6900 5927 91 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 Feet ux r. t n- •ad Y T<. .., �_: ❑ w Fz U F Zz ❑ W Ow O o w o❑ W a > ujz a z¢" 3 >> a i ❑❑ U O x Z C K 0] a u ❑ c O w ❑ O O i z o J w z < rc w Z „ z w w 3 w 19�V d 4769 a •oa, yll w P T' m e n fz Y at 2 c W N m N Em Z. V tFll � Z n. m m 3 v m. T'xo E'O ,q LL z a Nz w ❑z.. F E_ Z. EE m vjo n o c N G � N 3 � ni o °a zm z cta� n6m° o= U N _ma q.. .. .,4j °aV �LL p�.ai ° g Z�. o i E $ m c E `o LLJ " 2 m m U c 3 a z rl O Q ZCi E ,E @ v o N LU c 1"2 E$ E� A ci aka = Nya EiE�m - wZN ox c ILL. c•sc, R� c s \ \ o Q N Z oo °o mx W OCao o Mm v \ o M33 m zo: �NO > d_ > »� N m �3 oIN 1v Z m Sa JNZmyo $ _1 m 33 ZH W W p .1 RUS J 0 7 1 N V.0 V I - s 0. use o" s. 3 W d O foal m ° '3 I ° oSY9aQ w mZOm ; 0 5m KmE _ cn ry 107 1NVOVn ^ Q a � Cd Q z I (W).oz- 993..00.00.006 — (a) .OZ'S9 M.90.00a00N a e 1 07 1 NVJ V 1 O7 '1 N V VA. ca AID 3 N I❑ w 10.7 1NV.7Vn AV w (W8 '•0Y.N _ m` .O3.0 LU f 4 ErS Z.W ° \ \\ 4 —n N. 0 W Na m of a I c 18 8 sz s p.a 5 } m n II toy (H) .OZ'99 MAMMON MON yS w He (W).On93.14. 0.00N z° E.�• - 97 101 .. 1., i ,�if•"`.f":°.l> "''Ir?°".a7-. �'''� .�""- ,Sr�.,`%.�z� s,�^ �.> z E w m e n fz Y at 2 c W N m N Em Z. V mz mn G. i O Z m.;� m�y9 0 N 0 O n. m m 3 v m. T'xo E'O ,q LL z a Nz w ❑z.. F E_ Z. EE m vjo n o c N G � N 3 � ni o °a zm z cta� n6m° o= U N _ma q.. .. .,4j °aV �LL p�.ai ° g Z�. o i E $ m c E `o LLJ " 2 m m U c 3 a Q ° m a s m m ° E Q ZCi E ,E @ v o N LU c 1"2 E$ E� A ci aka = Nya EiE�m - wZN ox c $ cN .O> O EE O oa M . o �E m u'.0a�'nww i - COII`IUNITii SERVICE OVERLAY DISTRICT 20 -9.3 ARTICLE IX. CO3D UPIITY SERVICE'! OVERLAY` DISTRICT 20 -9.1 Purpose and intent. It is the purpose and intent of this section to promote the health, safety, community acceptable standards of morals and general' welfare of the residents of the City of South Miami through the stated regulations of this section. The Community Services overlay zoning district is intended to provide for the establishment of an overlay zoning district in the Charrette Too StudyArea, in order to provide for the special needs of community -based service providers, and, specifically, to permit parking lot improvements, outparcel development, day care center facilities and building additions for those properties under the sole ownership of community. - based service ,providers, such as churches, mosques, synagogues, or temples. (Ord. No. 1 -97 -1622, t 1, 2- 18 -97) 20 -9.2 Applicability. The requirements of this :article shall be in addition to other requirements in the City's adopted Land Development Code, and in the case of conflict the provisions of this Article shall control. (Ord. No. 1- 97- 1622, § 1, 2- 18 -97) . 20 -9.3 Boundaries. The properties in the Community Service (CS) overlay zoning district shall be delineated on the City's Official Zoning Map with the symbol "CS -OV" and -shown as darkened areas in Figure 20 -9.1. The properties are legally described as follows: Lots 7, 8 and 12 of Block 1, PINES SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 13 at Page 2 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; and, Lots 31, 32 and 33 of Block 5, Lots 34, 35 and 36 of Block 6 and the alley lying between Lots 34 and 35, Lot 40, less the west 15 feet thereof, Lots 41, 42, 43, 44, 45 and 46 of Block 7, and 4 feet of the alley lying south and adjacent to Lot 46, Lots 70 and 71 of Block 12, and Lot 87 of Block 15 and 71/1' feet of the alley lying west and adjacent to Lot 87, less roadway dedications, FRANKLIN SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 5 at Page 35 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; and, Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11,-12, 13 25, and 26, RE-SUBDIVISION OF TOWNSITE OF LARKINS,'according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 4 at Page 1 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; and, Lots 12,13 and 14 of Block 2, TOWNSITE OF LARKINS SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof, as recorded' in na't Boot: 2 at Page 105 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; and, the North '/_ of'Lot 5, Lots 6, 7, S, 9, 10, 111 12 and 13 of Block 2, and Lots 4, 5, 6, and 7 of Block 4, less roadway dedications, AMENDED' PLAT' OF HHA-tiILET, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 4 at Page 48 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; and, East 50 feet of Nest 200 feet of Forth 10 -5.50 feet of East Ih, of Northwest Vi of Southeast Vi Less Streets, Section' 25- 54 -40, Dade County, Florida; and East 50 feet of Nest 150 feet of North 105.50 feet of East 1/2 of Northwest 1h of Southeast V, Less.. Streets, Section 25- 54 -40, Dade County, Florida; and. East 50 feet of Nest 100 feet of North i i supp. No. 6 199 20 -9.3 SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE' 105.50 feet of East 1/2 of Northwest 1/4 of Southeast 114 Less Streets, Section 25- 54 -40, Dade County, Florida; and West 50 feet of North 105.50 feet of East 1/a or Northwest 1/4 of Southeast 1/4 Less Streets, Section 25- 54 -40, Dade County, Florida. (Ord. No. 1 -97 -1622, § 1, 2 -18 -97 Ord. No. 3 -99 -1677, § 1, 1- 19 -99; Ord. No. 24 -99 -1698, § 1, 11- 16 -99; Ord. No. 4 -01 -1735, § 1, 2 -6 -01) 1 . 200 COMMUNITY SERVICE OVERLAY DISTRICT 20 -9.4 20.9.4 ;Definitions. The definitions below, as may be amended from time to time, shall apply -to Article IX only. Other than the revised definitions included in this subsection, the definitions provided under Section 20 -2.3 of the Land Development Code are applicable to the provisions of Article IX. Accessory building shall mean a detached subordinate building or portion thereof, the use of which is incidental to and in connection with a principal or main building which is under the same ownership as the main building. No accessory building shall be permitted which is not owned in conjunction with a principal or main building. Accessory use shall mean a building or structure, the use of which is subordinate and incidental to the main building or structure, and is under the same ownership as the main building or structure. Adult congregate living facility shall mean any building or buildings, section of a building or distinct part of a building, operated as 'a nonprofit entity, which undertakes through its ownership and management to provide, for a period exceeding twenty -four (24) hours, housing,' food service and one or more personal services for four (4) or more adults, not related to the administrator by blood or marriage, who require such,services and to provide limited nursing services, when specifically licensed to do so pursuant to Florida Statutes. A facility offering personal services or limited nursing services for fewer than four (4) adults is within the meaning of this definition if it formally or informally advertises to or solicits the public for. residents or referrals and hold itself out to the public to be an establishment which regularly provides such services. Church, mosque, synagogue or temple shall mean a formerly organized religious entity with ownership of property or properties, a building or other structures, or a group of buildings or structures, which, by design and construction, are intended for organized worship services and commonly related services, such as educational, recreational, and social services, including day care and other ,community services, which principal facilities and main worship sanctuary structure are located in the Community Services (CS) overlay zoning district. Community residential home shall mean an establishment licensed to serve clients of the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, which provides a living environment for unrelated residents who operate as 'a functional equivalent of a family, including such supervision and care by supportive staff as may be necessary to meet the physical, emotional and social needs of residents. Community service providers shall mean the existing institutions whose main buildings or structures are located within the Community Service (CS) overlay zoning district as of the adoption date I of this subsection, such as churches, mosques, synagogues or temples. Day care center shall mean any establishment providing for the daytime care of seven (7) or more children and licensed by the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services. Group Home (See Community residential home.). Supp._No. 3 201 20 -9.4 SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE School shall mean institutions of general education offering kindergarten through 12th grade education or any portion thereof, including special programs and facilities. (Ord. No. 1 -97 -1622, § 1, 2- 18 -97) 20 -9.5 Development review procedures. (A) Applicants shall meet in pre - application conference with the Planning and Zoning Division staff to discuss and analyze proposed applications in non - binding forum. Staff may prescribe special conditions in order to assure the overall compatibility of the proposes uses and physical structures with the neighboring uses and physical structures. (B) Applicants shall submit an application for development responding to the pre- application conference findings in the form prescribed under the provisions of Section 20 -5, entitled Article V. Procedures and Applications, as contained in the Land Development Code. (C) Upon receipt of applications for development, the Planning and Zoning staff shall review the application and assure that proposed uses and physical structures are compliant with the purpose, intent and requirements of this article and 'applicable Code requirements. (D) Upon the staffs determination of compliance with the purpose; intent and require • % . ments of this article and applicable Code requirements by the Planning and Zoning Division, the application shall be reviewed by the ERPB, as regulated by Section 20 -5.11. (E) Applicants shall incorporate ERPB conditions, if any, and apply for all required building, electrical, mechanical, plumbing and utility permits, as regulated by Section 20- 5.13. ' (Ord. No. 1 -97 -1622, § 1, 2- 18 -97) 20 -9.6 Permitted uses and special uses. (A) The uses listed below are permitted by right within the district and are applicable to both new and existing buildings, including accessory structures and accessory uses. Permitted Use by Right Required Parking Spaces Church, temple or synagogue 1 per 3`seating spaces Community residential home,* 6 persons or 2 per dwelling unit less Day care center,* 7 children or more 1 per 250 gross square feet Dwelling, single - family* 2 per dwelling unit d li t N n Park or 1 aygroun , pu b c or pnva e o e *under the ownership, management and control of a defined community service provider. (B) The uses listed below are permitted via special use approval. Applicants shall follow the procedures established for special uses, as set forth in subsections 20- 5.8(B) through (F), and shall follow those procedures for the required public hearings, as set forth in general in Section 20-5.1 through Section 20 -5.6. Supp. No. 3 202 COMMUNITY SERVICE OVERLAY DISTRICT 20 -9.7 l 1. Permitted by Special Use Approval Required Parking Spaces Adult congregate living facility* 2 per dwelling unit Community residential home,* 7 persons or, 2 per dwelling unit more Counseling services,* as defined under Sec - 1 per 250 gross square feet tion 20 -2.3 Funeral home,* per conditions under Section 1 per 300 gross square feet 20- 3.4(B)(3) School, elementary or secondary* 1 per 400 gross square feet School, vocational or special programs* 1 per 400 gross square feet *under the ownership, management and control of a defined community service provider. (Ord. No 1- 97- 1622, § 1, 2- 18 -97) 20 -9.7 Dimensional- requirements. Minimum lot size (for subdivision only): Net lot area (square feet)... .... .. 6,000 Frontage (linear feet ) ................................................ 60 Required build -to lines (for principal structures): Front street (address side).. . ... Property line Side street (not including alleyways) .. ..: ..... ....................... Property line Canopies, awnings and arcades may project over existing sidewalk areas Minimum yard setbacks (for new construction): Front street (address side) . .................. ................ . 0.0 feet Side street (not including alleyways) . .. ... . . 0.0 feet Side street (for alleyways only) . ..... ... .. 5.0 feet Side (Interior) . .. ..... .... .. .... 7.5 feet Rear (Interior).. . ... ...... ... ... ...... 10.0 feet Rear street. ... .. .... .... . 0.0 feet Any side adjacent to a single- family residence . .. ... 25.0 feet Maximum building height: Stories...... ...... . .. ....... .. .... 2 Feet .. ............................... .. ... .. .. • - • 25.0 feet - Maximum building coverage ( %) . .. ... .. .. .. 75 Supp; No. 5 203 20 -9.7 SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE Maximum impervious coverage ( %). .... 85 "(Ord. No. 1 -97 -1622, § 1, 2- 18 -97) 20 -9.8 Parking regulations. Buildings erected, converted, enlarged, reconstructed, moved or structurally altered shall conform to the off - street parking requirements in Section 20 -4.4. (Ord. No. 1 -97 -1622, § 1, 2- 18 -97) 20 -9.9 Signage regulations'. The provisions of Section 20 -4.3 shall apply; and all properties in the Community Service overlay zoning district shall be permitted signage as set forth under subsection 20 -4.3 (I)(5):' (Ord. No. 1 -97 -1622, § 1, 2- 18 =97) 20 -9.10 Supplemental regulations. The provisions of Section 20 -3.6 shall apply-, and all properties in the Community Service overlay zoning district shall be evaluated under the provisions of Section 20 -3.6 as though the properties were exclusively used for single -family residential purposes. The purpose of this is to provide for visual uniformity with the surrounding single - family residential neighborhood: (Ord. No. 1 -97 -1622, § 1, 2- 18 -97)' 20 -9.11 Unity of title required. ., (A) A Unity of Title, as set forth in Section 20 -5.16, is required for all platted lots in any development project within the Community Service Overlay District if any of the following conditions 'exist. (1) If a development project is to be built on two (2) or more abutting platted lots; (2) If the permitted density of a development project is based upon the averaging of two (2) or more platted 'lots either abutting or located on the opposite -sides of a public right -of -way or alley; (3) If the required parking for a development project is located on a lot other than on the site which is generating the required parking. (Ord. No. 23 -99 -1697, § 6, 11- 16 -99) �C SOUT�1 O .4 r •INCORPORATES 1927 R I D CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING BOARD / Action Summary Minutes Regular Meeting Tuesday, May 9, 2006 City Commission Chambers 7:30 P.M. EXCERPT I Call to Order and the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag Action: The meeting was called to order at 7 :36 P.M. Action: The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison. H. Roll Call. Action: Mr. Morton, Chairperson, requested aroll call. Board members present constituting a quorum: Mr. Morton, Ms.- Lahiff,' Mr. Beilman, Mr. Davis and Mr. Farfan. Board members absent: Mr. Comendeiro, Ms. Yates. City staff present: R. Don O'Donniley, AICP (Planning Director) Sanford A. Youkilis, AICP (Planning Consultant), Brian Edney (Video Support), and Patricia E. Lauderman (Planning Board Secretary). IV. Planning Board Applications / Public Hearings Mr. Morton swore in the speakers. PB -06 -012 Applicant: Higher Praise & Worship Center, South Miami Church of God of Prophecy Address 5974 SW 66 h Street, 5977 SW 66th Terrace AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE - CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO A REQUEST TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY PLACEMENT OF A CS -OV, COMMUNITY SERVICE OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT ON LOTS 7,8,27,28,29 AND 30 BLOCK' A OF'RESUBDIVISION OF BLOCKS 3 &' 4 OF THE TOWNSITE OF LARKINS LOCATED AT 5974 SW 66th STREET, 5977 SW 66th TERRACE OVER THE EXISTING RS -4 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT FOR THIS PROPERTY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE Planning Board Meeting May 9, 2006 Page 2 of 3 Action: Mr. Morton read the ordinance into the record. Mr. O'Donniley explained that the applicant is requesting a rezoning of six lots which are part of twelve lots owned by the Higher Praise and Worship Center, South Miami Church of God of Prophecy which is located at 6600 SW 59th Place. The rezoning request is to place the community Service Overlay District zone over the six lots which would result in all of the church's property on this block being of the same zoning, RS -4 (CS -OV). The purpose of the rezoning is to allow the additional lots to be used for church 'purposes as defined in the Land Development Code. Mr. O'Donniley also indicated that in 1997, at the time the Community Service Overlay District was created all of the church's property at that time (Lots 1 -6) were placed in the overlay district. The applicant's current rezoning site consists of Lots 7,8,27,28,29 and 30, Block A of the re- subdivision of the Townsite of Larkins. Two of the lots face SW 66' Street and four lots face SW 6e Terrace. Four of the six lots are vacant. There is an existing single family residence on Lots 27 and 28. _In addition, Mr. O'Donniley provided the following staff observations: 1) The applicant Higher Praise & Worship Center, South Miami Church of God of Prophecy qualifies as a community -based service provider as defined in the LDC Section 20 -9.4 and is eligible to apply for the placement of the CS -OV zoning district on property owned by the church. 2) The applicant has not set forth a specific development plan for the subject properties undergoing rezoning. It can be anticipated that a major portion of these lots will be used for off - street parking. The CS- OV'regulations require a number of potential uses (schools, ACLF's, group homes, funeral homes, counseling services) to obtain approval through a separate special use application process. A detailed review of the applicant's site plan would be part of the special use approval process. 3) The proposed zoning change is compatible with the existing zoning pattern and with other uses in the immediate neighborhood. Mr. O'Donniley explained that the application fee was waived, and that the rezoning is ` accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance amending three sections of the Land Development Code: a) modify Section 20 -9.3, Boundaries, by including the written legal description of the six lots; b) modify the boundary map, Figure 20 -9.1, to include the subject property parcels; c) Amend the City's Official Zoning Map by changing the zoning on the six lots from "RS -4" to "RS -4 (CS -OV)'. Planning Board Meeting May 9, 2006 Page 3 of 3 Recommendation Staff recommended that the Higher Praise &`Worship Center, South Miami Church of God of Prophecy request to change zoning of Lots 7,8,27,28,29 and 30, Block A of the :Re- subdivision of the Townsite of Larkins from RS -4 to RS- 4(CS -0V) be approved, subject to the submission of a Unity of Title, as required by Section 20 -9.11 of the LDC. Applicant: Rev. Pansy Graham Rev. Graham explained that Higher Praise & Worship Center South Miami Church of God of Prophecy has acquired over the past years additional land in order to expand the church in the future. She indicated that the church has served the community from its present location for over 50 years, reaching out to the community through spiritual guidance, youth programs and various community; outreach endeavors. She ended her remarks by stating that all the church is requesting is for the lots that pertain to the church to be zoned for church use. Chair Morton opened the public hearing. Speakers: NAME ADDRESS SUPPORT /OPPOSE' David Tucker Supported Mr. Tucker indicated he has been a long time resident of South Miami and believed that that the rezoning of the lots for church use will be beneficial use for South Miami residents since this church runs programs that help the well -being of this community. Chair Morton closed the public hearing. Mr. Beilman asked Rev. Graham if she knew about the anticipated use of the lots that will be rezoned. Rev. Graham explained that presently the land is being used for parking but the anticipated use for the lots will be for another sanctuary as well as upgrading of the present facility. Motion: Mr. Beilman moved to recommend approval of the request with staffs conditions: 1. Submittal of Unity of Title 2. Application fee be waived. Ms. Lahiff seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes 5 Nays 0 �TeAl 1 2 ORDINANCE NO. 3 4 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY 5 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, 6 FLORIDA, REPEALING CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 7 ORDINANCE NO. 40 ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE 8 PROVIDING' FOR THE SEGREGATION ` OF THE WHITE 9 AND COLORED CITIZENS OF THE CITY OF SOUTH 10 MIAMI, FLORIDA;" PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; 11 ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND AN EFFECTIVE 12 DATE. 13 14 WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami shall take all 15 appropriate measures, including legislation, to modify or abolish existing laws, regulations, 16 ordinances and practices which constitute discrimination; and, 17 WHEREAS, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (as amended) as codified in Title 42 Chapter 18 41 of the United States Code prohibits discriminatory practices; and, 19 WHEREAS, the City Commission recognizes that Ordinance No. 40 passed and adopted 20 on the 17th day of January, 1928 has been superceded by Federal and State law outlawing racial 21 discrimination and segregation; and, 22 WHEREAS, the Commission of the City of South Miami specifically recognizes that 23 Ordinance No. 40 is no longer in effect and that the civil rights of all citizens are equal before the 24 law; and, 25 WHEREAS, the Commission desires to denounce the Ordinance and formally repeal' 26 Ordinance No. 40, and specifically recognize the equal rights and protection for all citizens. 27 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY 28 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA THAT: 29 30 Section 1. Ordinance No. 40 entitled "An Ordinance Providing for the Segregation of j 31 the White and Colored Citizens of the City of South Miami, Florida," is hereby denounced, 32 vanquished, dissolved and formally repealed. A copy of Ordinance No. 40 is annexed and made 33 part of this Ordinance. 34 Additions shown by underlining and deletions shown by evefstg ,, .r,- .. I Section 2. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this 2 ordinance are hereby vanquished, dissolved and repealed. 3 4 Section 3. This ordinance ;shall take affect immediately upon approval. 5 6 PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2006. 7 8 ATTEST: APPROVED: 9 10 11 CITY CLERK MAYOR 12 13 1st Reading 14 2nd Reading 15 16 COMMISSION VOTE: 17 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM Mayor Feliu: 18 Vice Mayor Wiscombe 19 Commissioner Palmer: 20 Luis R. Figueredo, Commissioner Birts: 21 Nagin Gallop &`Figueredo, P.A. Commissioner Beckman: 22 Office of City Attorney 23 24 Additions shown by underlining and deletions shown by eve . .. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2 3 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY 4 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, 5 FLORIDA RELATING TO ETHICS, AMENDING 6 CHAPTER 8A OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE 7 CITY ' OF SOUTH MIAMI, ENTITLED "CODE OF 8 ETHICS9% PROVIDING FOR THE DEFENSE OF 9 ELECTED OFFICIALS; DEFINITIONS; PROVISIONS 10 FOR DEFENSE OF ELECTED OFFICIALS; REQUEST 11 PROCESS AND APPROVAL OF DEFENSE; 12 AUTHORIZATION; RESERVATION OF RIGHTS AND 13 IMMUNITIES; APPLICABILITY; PROVISIONS WHEN 14 COMPLAINT OR ALLEGATIONS ARE FOUND TO BE 15 MALICIOUS, FRIVOLOUS OR GROUNDLESS; 16 PROVIDING FOR REPEAL, SEVERABILITY; 17 PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE; AND 18 PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 19 20 WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission of the City of 'South Miami find 21 that in order to encourage qualified ,persons to serve the City of South Miami, it is 22 necessary to protect such persons from certain legal expenses incurred in protecting 23 themselves from allegations of violating 'State, County, or Municipal ethical standards 24 and guidelines, while acting in the course and scope of their service to the City of South 25 Miami; and, 26 27 WHEREAS, at chapter 8A, the city adopted its Code of Ethics, governing the 28 ethical standards and guidelines for elected and employed city public officials; and, 29 30 WHEREAS, the city reserved section 8A -6 and seeks to now create a new section 31 8A -6, which section shall provide the procedures, definitions and details on approving the 32 defense of the city's elected public officials; and, 33 Page' 1 of 7 Additions shown by underlining and deletions shown by eve .mg. �c=i.:OR V: 1 WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami find 2 that the adoption of this Ordinance is in the best interest of the City of South Miami; and 3 4 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY 5 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA THAT: 6 Section 1. Recitals Adopted. That all of the above stated recitals are hereby 7 adopted, confirmed and incorporated by reference into this ordinance. 8 Section 2. Chapter 8A of the City Code is amended as follows: 9 10 8A -6 Resef. Defense of 'Official in Ethics Matters. 11 (a) Definitions. When used in this section, the following words shall mean as 12 indicated: 13 14 1'. The Term " Official" shall mean solely the following the e Ma, oar' and 15 all members of the City Commission. 16 17 2`. The term "City_ Fund' shall mean only funds appropriated for 18 expenditure by the City Commission. 19 20 3. The Term "Counsel" shall mean the attorney independently selected 21 by the Official for the purpose of defending the Official in actions or 22 proceedings in accordance with this section. Counsel shall be 23 licensed to practice law in Florida, experienced in ethics defense, 24 and otherwise adequately qualified for the purpose of such 25 representation. 26 27 4. The term "Le a 1 Expenses" shall mean reasonable attorney 28 and necessary defense expenses directly incurred in defending an 29 Official in accordance with this section. 30 31 5. The term "Le ag� l Defense" shall mean' the services provided by 32 Counsel in defending an Official accordance with this section. 33 34 6. The -term "Reimbursable Costs" shall; mean approved necessary 35 incidental expenses, including, but not limited to travel expenses 36 directly incurred by the Official in association with the defense of 37 actions or proceedings in accordance with this section. Page 2 of 7 Additions shown by underlining and deletions shown by ever-striking. 1 2 3 4 5 6 (b) Defenses of Officials. Upon the request of the City Official (the "Official") the City may, in its discretion, provide for the Legal Defense of any action or proceeding brought against such Official for acts or omissions arising out of and in the course and scope of the Official's function when such Official is charged with 7 a violation of any provision of the Code of Ethics for Public Officers and � 8 Em to ees Part III Chapter 112 Florida Statutes Section 2 -11:1 Miami -Dade 9 , County Code, or chapter 8A -1 through 5 of the City s ethics ordinances. The 10 provision of Legal Defense is limited to the payment of Legal Expenses to 11 Counsel and the payment of approved Reimbursable Costs to the Official incurred 12 for the purpose of defending actions or proceedings in accordance with the 13 provisions of this section. This section shall not apply to any action brought or 14 initiated by the City against an official. 15 16 (c) Request for Approval. A written request for the provision of Legal Defense 17 (the "Request ") shall be submitted by the Official and reviewed in accordance 18 with the following procedure: 19 20 1- A Request shall be submitted to and reviewed by the City Manager. 21 22 2. A Request shall be submitted after the Official is served with a 23 complaint, notice, charge, summons process or other initiating 24 pleading, 25 26 3. A Request shall include the name, address, resume, and hourly rate 27 of Counsel and a copy of the complaint notice charge, summons 28 process or other initiating pleading 29 30 4. The City Manager shall recommend approval or denial the Request 31 in writing within ten (10) dgys after receipt of such Request The 32 City Manager's recommendation is subject to the City Attorney 33 concurrence that said Request is consistent with the requirements of 34 this section. 35 36 5. The City Commission shall consider and vote on the 37 recommendation of the City Manager and City Attorney to fund 38 Legal Expenses and Costs as provided for under Section 8A- 6(e)(1) 39 40 41 (d) Authorization. The City Manager is hereby authorized to ex end City 42 Funds, upon the review and approval of a Request for the payment of Legal Page 3 of 7 Additions shown by underlining and deletions shown by east ikiag. I Expenses and Reimbursable Costs in accordance with subsection 8A -6(b) The 2 authorization to expend City Funds shall not extend to any appeal or other judicial 3 review without additional authorization of City Commission The expenditure of 4 City Funds shall be paid from a specific City account established in the City 5 budget for the purposes of this section or from other funds designated for Mater 6 or Commission use. No funds of the City, other than City Funds, as defined in 7 subsection 8A -6(a) shall be used for the Legal Defense of an Official The 8 expenditure of City Funds for the payment of Legal Expenses and Reimbursable 9 Costs shall be subject to the following_ 10 11 (1) Counsel of the Official shall on a monthly basis submit all current 12 bills for Legal Expenses to the City's finance department in a format 13 approved by the City Attorney and Finance Director. The Official 14 shall on a monthly basis submit all current bills for Reimbursable 15 Costs to the City's finance department in a format gpproved by the 1$ City Attorney and Finance Director; 17 18 (2) The City Manager and City Attorney shall review and approve all 19 submitted bills prior to the payment by the City; 20 21 (3) Upon approval of submitted bills, the City Manager shall provide for 22 direct payment to Counsel for Legal Expenses and to the Official for 23 Reimbursable Costs. Payment shall be made on a monthly basis 24 during the pendency of the action or proceeding pursuant to Section 25 218.70, Florida Statutes, et. seq. 26 27 (4) The City M- anager shall on a monthly basis provide a copy of all 28 approved bills to the City Clerk for filing and retention as a public 29 record and for public inspection subject to an applicable exemption 30 31 (e) Reservations oughts and immunities. 32 33 34 1. The provision of the Legal Defense of an Official as provided in 35 subsection 8A-5(b), including_ those acts for which the defense m 36 be provided and the extent of City funds which may be expended 37 shall be solely within the discretion of both !the Cty Manager and 38 City Attorney. 39 40 2. The City Manager and City Attorney, deny or revoke approval 41 of the Request if they determine that the request is beyond' the scone Page 4 of '7 Additions shown by underlining and deletions shown by ever- *k 1 of this section, the applicable ethics ordinance, or inconsistent with 2 the purposes of this section; 3 4 3. The City Manager and City Attorney reserves the right to dente 5 Request when the Official has failed to select qualified Counsel, or 6 when the proposed fee schedule is deemed unreasonable; 7 8 4. The 'City Manager and City Attorney reserve the right to revoke 9 approval of the Request when the Official fails to cooperate in the 10 defense of such action or proceeding; 11 12 5. The Official shall reimburse the City for any and all City funds 13 expended for payment' of Legal Expenses and Reimbursable Costs 14 when it is determined that the alleged act or omission was taken 15 outside the course or scope of the duties of the Official, or when the 16 Official was adjudicated guilAy of the alleged violation. The City 17 reserves unto itself the right to seek reimbursement and /or recovery 18 from the Official of the City Funds expended for payment of Legal 19 Expenses and Reimbursable Costs' in accordance with this section 20 when it is determined that the alleged act or omission was taken 21 outside the course or scope of the duties of the Official` or where 22 such Official was adjudicated guifty of the alleged violation; I 23 24 6. Nothing in this section shall authorize the Cty Manager and City 25 Attorney to provide for the Legal Defense of an Official where the p � 26 alleged act or omission was taken outside the course or scope of the 27 duties of the Official, or where the Official has acted in bad faith 28 with ;malicious purpose, or in a' manner exhibiting wanton and 29 willful disregard of human rights, safety or property; 30 31 7. Nothing in this section shall authorize the City Manager and City 32 Attorney to provide for the Legal Defense of an Official where it is 33 alleged that said Official failed to comply with applicable financial 34` and gift disclosure requirements mandated by Chapter 112, Florida 35 Statutes, Section '2 -11.1, Miami -Dade County Code, or the City's 36 ethics code concerning financial and gift disclosure 37 38 8. Nothing in this section shall be construed as a waiver by the City or 39 any Official of any claim of immunity, including sovereign 40 immunity, applicable to any action 41 Page 5 of 7 Additions shown by underlining and deletions shown by esttking. 1 9. . Any Official who submits a Request and is subsequently provided ,a 2 Legal Defense at the expense of the City in > accordance with this 3 section shall be prohibited from seeking' further remuneration from 4 the City for any expenses incurred by said Official during or 5 resulting from the defense of any action or proceeding contemplated 6 by this section, 7 8 10. Where an Official fails to avail him/herself of the provisions of this 9 section, and no Legal Defense was provided at the expense of the 10 City, nothing herein shall - prohibit such Official from seeking 11 reimbursement from the city for legal expenses_ incurred in the 12 successful defense of a violation or violating of any provision of the 13 Code of Ethics for Public Officers' and Employees,' Pat I1I, Chapter 14 112, Florida Statutes, Section 2 -11.1 Miami -Dade County Code, or 15 chapter 8A -1 through 5 of the City's ethics code where said Official 16 was acting in the course and scope of the Official's function,' and 17 said Official is subsequently acquitted, or the charge or charges 18 against said Official are dismissed. 19 20 21 (0 ApplicabilitL The provisions of this section shall apply to all actions and 22 proceeding_ pending at the time of or instituted after the effective date of this 23 section. As used herein, an action shall be construed to be pending where the 24 action has not been tried, or if tried where the judgment has not become final 25 by reason of the completion of angppellate proceedings; 26 27 (g) Malicious, Frivolous or Groundless Allegations. :In accordance with Section 28 112.317(8) Fla. Stat. or Section 2- 1074(t), Miami -Dade County Code where it 29 is determined that the complaining _party filed a frivolous or groundless 30 complaint, or filed a complaint with malicious intent to injure the reputation of 31 the Official by filing the complaint with knowledge that the complaint contains 32 one _ or more false allegations or with reckless disregard for whether the 33 complaint contains false allegations of fact material to a violation the City 34 may 'seek recovery of Legal Expenses and Reimbursable Costs incurred by the 35 City from the complaining party in the name of the Official or as subro elf 36 the official. 37 38 Section 3. Severability. If any word, clause, phrase, sentence, paragraph or 39 section of this ordinance is held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction,` such Page 6 of 7 Additions shown by underlining and deletions shown by;ever-sttiki :'" -t�`5 I declaration of invalidity shall not affect any other word, clause, phrase, sentence; 2 paragraph or section of this ordinance. 3 Section 4. Codification. This ordinance shall be codified and included in the 4 Code of Ordinances. 5 6 Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective upon passage by the 7 City Commission on second reading. 8 9 PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2006. 10 11 ATTEST: APPROVED: 12 13 14 CITY CLERK MAYOR 15 16 1st Reading 17 2nd Reading 18 19 COMMISSION VOTE. 20 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM Mayor Feliu 21 Vice Mayor Wiscombe 22 Commissioner Beckman: 23 Luis R. Figueredo, Commissioner Birts: 24 Nagin Gallop & Figueredo, P.A. Commissioner Palmer: 25 Office of City Attorney 26 27 I, li! Page 7 of 7 Additions shown by underlining and deletions shown byover-stfil