Loading...
02-06-07 Item 15South Miami AA•America City CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 927 1® OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER R INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM 2001 To: The Honorable Mayor Feliu and Members of the City Commission Via: Yvonne S. McKinley, City Manager ' From: Julian Perez, Planning Director 5�P Date: February 6, 2006 ITEM No Ir Subject: A RESOLUTIOIN OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO A REQUEST PURSUANT TO SECTION 20 -7.51 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOR A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN THE "SR(HD -.OV)" SPECIALITY RETAIL (HOMETOWN DISTRICT OVERLAY) ZONING DISTRICT TO PERMIT SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS TO SECTIONS 20 -7.811, 20- 7.10B, 20 -7.11 IN ORDER TO: (1) ALLOW A TOTAL LOT COVERAGE OF 85% OR 26,833 SQUARE FEET WHICH EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM 60% LOT COVERAGE ON SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY AND THE MAXIMUM 50% LOT COVERAGE ON SW 74th STREET; (2) ALLOW A BUILDING TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE OF 20,000 SQUARE FEET; (3) ALLOW A CURB CUT TO BE LOCATED ON SW 59th COURT WHICH LOCATION IS NOT SHOWN ON THE HOMETOWN DISTRICT REGULATING PLAN; ALL FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 5966 -70 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The intent of this memorandum is to update you on the status of the subject resolution. During the City Commission Special Meeting, dated January 18, 2007, the Commission instructed the Planning Department staff to work with the Applicant to address the traffic flow issues, curb cut issue (coordinate a meeting with the Florida Department of Transportation — District 6) and the preparation of a development agreement. STATUS REPORT A. Traffic Flow - The Planning Department staff met with the Applicant (January 24, 2007) to address the potential project related traffic flow issues discussed by the Commission. The Planning staff is currently evaluating five preliminary traffic flow alternatives: 1. No action — No development at the site. 2. Original alternative proposed by the Applicant in the initial designs — Traffic will enter and exit the parking area from SW 74th Street and SW 59th Court. There will be no controls to redirect the traffic from the proposed development away from the neighborhood roads. 3. Convert SW 74th Street into a one -way road — The intent of this alternative is to use SW 74th Street and SW 61St Avenue as the main roadways to direct the traffic exiting the proposed development into US 1. 4. Direct Project Traffic to SW 74th Street and SW 61St Avenue - The intent of this alternative is to guide all the traffic exiting the proposed development into SW 74th Street and SW 61St Avenue while keeping SW 74th Street a two -way road. The traffic will be guided into US 1 by a series of signs and turning structure to be constructed at the parking garage access points; intersection of SW 59t Court and SW 74th Street; and intersection of SW 74th Street and SW 61St Avenue. 5. Direct Project Traffic to SW 74th Street, SW 61St Avenue and SW 76th Street — The intent of this alternative is to direct the proposed project traffic to the intersection of US 1 and SW 62nd Avenue (traffic light). This alternative may require traffic calming on the intersection of SW 76th Street and SW 61St Avenue. This potential route will limit the amount of project related traffic using SW 73rd Street (traffic light) and SW 61St Avenue (stop sign) as a connecting road to US 1 (southern direction). This route may,also be used by area residents working in either the office or retail use of the project. " The Planning staff has requested a meeting with the Traffic Consultant (David Plummer and Associates) to review the results of the initial traffic survey and potential traffic flow alternatives. The intent of this meeting is to address the Commissioners concern regarding the traffic survey methodology and results. The Applicant is responsible for coordinating this meeting. B. Curb Cut Issue - The Planning Department staff (including the Applicant and Project Architect) met with the Florida Department of 'Transportation — District Six staff (Ali AI -Said, P.E. District Permit Engineer and Ali Khalilahmadi, P.E., PTOE Assistant District Permit Engineer) on January 24, 2007 to discuss the FDOT curb cut requirements for US 1. Prior to starting the meeting, the Planning staff presented a letter from the City to FDOT requesting guidance on the Department curb cut requirements for US 1 (Attachment A). A response was received on January 29, 2007 (Attachment B). The FDOT staff indicated that the "Access Management Handbook "Spacing Standards" Class 5 requires a minimum distance of 245 feet between two access points (curb cut). If the Applicant has less than 245 feet between the two access points then the FDOT will require the Applicant to file a variance application. The variance application will be evaluated by an in -house committee. C. Development Agreement - The Applicant legal council submitted a draft development agreement on January 25, 2007. The Planning staff is currently reviewing the draft agreement. Thereafter, the Planning staff will coordinate an in -house meeting with Public Works and legal council (February 2, 2007) to review the draft agreement. The comments from the in -house meeting will be transmitted to the Applicant. The Applicant will be afforded at least one meeting with staff to review the comments, if necessary. Attached for your review is a status progress report matrix which provides an update on each of the Commissioners' recommendations from the January 18th 2007 Special Meeting (Attachment C). REQUEST The Planning Department is requesting a deferral of this item until the next City Commission meeting scheduled for February 20, 2007. We would like to have this deferral so that enough time is afforded to the review and negotiation of the development agreement. Enclosed is a letter from the Applicant agreeing to this request (Attachment D). JP /JP PAComm Items\2007\2 -6 -07 \5800 5966 South Dixie Hwy Report to Manager.doc ATTACHMENT A January 24, 2007 Mr. Ali Khalilahmadi Assistant District Permit Engineer FDOT- District 6 1000 NW 111 Avenue Miami, Florida 33172 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI South Miami 6130 SUNSET DRIVE F l o r i d a SOUTH MIAMI, FL 33143 A Tel: 305- 663 -6326 pll.pwrley env Fax: 305 -668 -7356 11101 2001 Re: 5966 & 5970 South Dixie Highway — Request for Determination Dear Mr. Khalilahmadi: The purpose of this correspondence is to follow -up on our telephone conference of January 19, 2007 regarding the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) curb cut requirements for US 1. As mentioned, the City of South Miami is requesting the FDOT — District 6 to provide guidance on whether a curb cut will be permitted along US 1 to facilitate egress and ingress into the referenced property. A map depicting the location of the proposed property is provided in Attachment A. The City of South Miami is currently reviewing a proposed mixed use development for the subject property (See: Attachment B). The proposed development is a four (4) story structure containing retail spaces on the ground floor, office spaces in the upper two floors and a parking garage. A portion of the proposed development will front US 1 as well as SW 74th Street and SW 59 Court. In reviewing the site plan., the proposed development shows dual access to the parking area from SW 74th Street and SW 59th Court. The City Commission has expressed concern with the proposed access locations to the parking area (SW 74th Street and SW 59th Court) and its impacts on neighborhood roads. As a result, the City Commission has recommended US 1 as an alternative access location to the parking area, if FDOT regulations would permit a curb cut along US 1 at this location. In order for this recommendation to be considered, the City of South Miami needs a written determination from FDOT— District 6 stating that existing regulations would allow a curb cut along US 1 at this location. We respectably request a formal response by no later than February 5, 2007 since this item will be considered by the City Commission on February 6, 2007. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call me at 305- 663 -6327. Thank you in advance for your assistance. J jr Planning Director City of South Miami JHP /SAY EA\Zoning Letters \5966 & 5970 S. Dixie Highway.doc ATTACHMENT A F City of South Miami PB -06 -032 Hometown Special Exceptions - Lot Coverage, Building Square Footage, Curb Cuts 5966 -70 S. Dixie Highway 7 N m 0 7000 a 7020 0 o n ° 704D Q U os s8 6 ss� �9 sago C. 6900 5g h C', s8 v h�0j 980 56 821 7001 m CO o CD ,o 7019 < o 0 c o 10 T. fD CO CO m m IM K < N ID t0 CO �O 0 7000 a 7020 0 o n ° 704D Q U os s8 6 ss� �9 sago C. 6900 5g h C', s8 v h�0j 980 56 821 TH ST Q 00 0 o ,J p 7051 CO 71 7�o SW 71ST ST = h� N (0 7,;0 rn S _] 7171 Q U") o o ` m m � 40 y Pv h� to L, c r M e {p 6101 U 5 89 SW 72ND ST SUNSET DR 90 6180 6110 5950 m m 5800 LO 7230 'O 5859 CO o 5946 5829 r � ro go 0 W 73RD ST / 5940 5824 1:2 1,, CO 7311 7340 7331 , a 0 7311 0 S U BJ CT y9h 7321 8so PROPE 5901 6022 6040 74TH o ^� �� 5950 5901 5675 w 5801 0 e 7410 7420 > SW 74TH TE If '" C *X 4P n = 5890 5800 744D 7500 7511 n Lr. 0 6� 7540 � 7515 7500 7515. 7520 U 7540 CO 7541 7530 7520 7535 rn 7`1 7532 7575 6101 7541 �' °m 5991 Ch n M m m 7563 "� to 'LO in �+ 7548 V4 SW 7 m 7611 5862 7610 6150 7606 0° 0 00 7601 F7620 7601 7600 7615 7616 7621 7621 5864 7620 7621 7620 7621 63 7620 0 300 600 900 1,200 1,500 Feet 7001 m CO o CD ,o 7019 rn w 0 TH ST Q 00 0 o ,J p 7051 CO 71 7�o SW 71ST ST = h� N (0 7,;0 rn S _] 7171 Q U") o o ` m m � 40 y Pv h� to L, c r M e {p 6101 U 5 89 SW 72ND ST SUNSET DR 90 6180 6110 5950 m m 5800 LO 7230 'O 5859 CO o 5946 5829 r � ro go 0 W 73RD ST / 5940 5824 1:2 1,, CO 7311 7340 7331 , a 0 7311 0 S U BJ CT y9h 7321 8so PROPE 5901 6022 6040 74TH o ^� �� 5950 5901 5675 w 5801 0 e 7410 7420 > SW 74TH TE If '" C *X 4P n = 5890 5800 744D 7500 7511 n Lr. 0 6� 7540 � 7515 7500 7515. 7520 U 7540 CO 7541 7530 7520 7535 rn 7`1 7532 7575 6101 7541 �' °m 5991 Ch n M m m 7563 "� to 'LO in �+ 7548 V4 SW 7 m 7611 5862 7610 6150 7606 0° 0 00 7601 F7620 7601 7600 7615 7616 7621 7621 5864 7620 7621 7620 7621 63 7620 0 300 600 900 1,200 1,500 Feet ATTACHMENT B IM 3 a� 7 "0 n L C S X m n � C D o z o 1! J S.W. 58th PL N f J yN mm9 m � Z i k. g -R Z g=A HuiC06 ui p � x�xe� x xxxx x � � x x � 3� 8w �fi BSgBR PI €�-NAu P m; a^ a T E U IR +�53a. \.y�p� fIk ao65ul'E 46o I�iNF�o 3af,3,125 aef!yn ®MOtev�rcllhc�a e�cem � o�g b x gRHO a § &g" IN p6 €did l jgsL§ B.O' iF pA 8 pg8gp p¢6g6 § R 8gE �I1O 7 g a a °9g $S- W-<RA dui aw 3n 101 �P map^ gel q i rl $� ATTACHMENT B Florida Department of Transportation CHARLIE CRIST District 6 Permit Office STEPHANIE KOPELOUSOS GOVERNOR INTERIM SECRETARY 1000 N.W. 1 1 1 Avenue, Room 6207 Miami, Florida 33172 -5800 Telephone (305)470 -5367, Fax (305)470 -5443 January 24, 2007 Julian H. Perez, Planning Director City of South Miami 6130 Sunset Dr. South Miami, FL 33143 SUBJECT: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 pre - application meeting for 5966 & 5970 Blocks on South Dixie Hwy, SR -5, Section 87030 Dear Mr. Perez, This is to acknowledge the outcome of the subject meeting as follow, Based on the "FDOT Access Management" classification criteria, US -1 is a class 5 facility within the vicinity of the mentioned Blocks. This classification requires a minimum distance of 245' between two access points. That, if the developer wishes to pursue the proposed plans, must apply for a special permit application to close the existing driveway on US -1, a drainage permit application and potentially a utility permit application. The initial processing of the permit may take up to 30 days, in which this office will inform the applicant of any required additional information. Should you have any question regarding this letter, please feel free to contact at (305) 470 -5367. Sincerely, Ali Khalilahmadi, P.E., PTOE. District Assistant Permits Engineer cc: Ali Al -Said, P.E. Section File (87030) ATTACHMENT C N J fi� A Z a mD mom' ac m°a$m a a a0 _Nm mo'3 - n El c a _ m� �m N 03 0 3 3 OR a= m o o Er m rcyr ' O F 3 3 3 3 t; 3 3 3 3 0 O m x x V x x a_ _ N 1 It n r T � 3 n Z 1 0 ° ° ° _Z 0 p o p `D D Do Zi u.';a� as na p �. 'omNm�mnm n`S0 g +r mom o�mv s oada aam ma �N a maoa �'niO 33 m'm ,_.z=� 'm33 r v_ v° n=gg �mm �..:£ o >>o�'- ,�3na�' ddmn of m ,z ^� < .mo.y3 c�-a�• m c %a c m y me : m n 5a � - vS y p a o Sam ; ^ �ma 3 m a � o Nom <_ � N 3= p m° " m a. n � 3 o �'n as 1° m D 'tie �a D D ma 3 0 _ny pp9e h{ na c> m o N m w p y aD:Dr a N c INA 6i, ^ ro y T v O J 3 -D`'. m a 02 10 °a Mkv N m2 pc 2. -3 m -' a - do ° =N° o 0 - E m y n m F m iR - o M _ Ra yc 3 n m - - 3 m s o a a x0 - - � o o _ s C 2 0l N P1 O T � a O 0 C, _ �3°- 33i'c j. j.0 % N N C A m N (/1 M C 3 C O 10 Im w N d m m m 3 9 Z ° C 0 a 3 Vo d. 0 K d N T3 V RE 3 ' � 78 3 3 3 9 3 0 7: <y' 0 a_ N m ol L7 r n V% y � ^ rs I kF o - `D wa ;y vm gr ag n3a mn4gE ^g. a oQm =�" � m8 m °man vdav Of -go 5 A C15 � m oa a 9 m lo _ oF. A'.o3''a 3m H m F a m 3 E 0 3 S t F � m }ozi z ;o z3ggz m m =ol-"� ... i8 83 4 5•d = =m'..2° c 4 `�' oR m o m Hn 32o ^ m n$8 g Ns ' Og o^ jm 3 �m mm Sm�s s a °° m D 3 m m° m g m ate_ T 3 m F m B.3 �3 m g='m F m E a a m m t'` -no-Fo °m ong g3 mo ^� c D m m F' aao as °mom - o m v 3 ° im a 2. 2 3 m �- 3- o =' o ° tmo m 3 : ',.7 m. n�ba gb 3 I.H'I g" - m 3 An 3 a gw w p° n m n�o' o° a �'g3 no3mn I_ - m F'm; _ao m m n m ol C A m N (/1 M C 3 C O 10 Im w N d m m m 3 9 Z ° C 0 a 3 Vo d. 0 K d N ED Vii./ k 2/ � ƒ§\ m to -0 CL !2 2 { So $tr!!! }!{ ({( ( }k \ \� | / {f \)� \, E \\ \ \ Er- ED Vii./ k 2/ � ƒ§\ m to -0 CL ATTACHMENT D 64 DEVELOPMENT CORP. January 30, 2007 Julian Perez Director of Planning City of South Miami RE: 5966 -5970 South Dixie Highway Dear Mr. Perez As per our conversation, I will accept a deferral to the continuance of the City Commission hearing for my property referenced above. I do appreciate all your efforts in trying to resolve the outstanding issues, but this application for the special exceptions has been submitted since October 2006 with the first hearing originally to be held on November 14, 2006. My application was complete upon its submittal and I have been cooperating to every other request by the City in a very timely manner. I simply ask that with this additional deferral to the next hearing date of February 20, 2007, all information, research and due diligence be completed in order for all the City's departments, commissioners and the Mayor be ready to make a well informed decision. I also request that this item be placed in the beginning of the agenda for that meeting. I am also attaching a summary report completed by David Plummer and Associates. This gives a brief overview to the original traffic study submitted. If you have any questions or need to meet with the engineers, please let me know. Thank you again for your cooperation. Sincerely, Marcelo Fernandes Marcelo Fernandes Vice President 4311 PONCE DE LEON BLVD. CORAL GABLES, FL • 33146 PHONE: 305 -663 -1293 FAX: 305 -665 -0272 WEB SITE: OXFORDUNIVERSAL.COM 5966 SOUTH DIXIE HWY TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY SUMMARY #06253 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Background • Location - 5966 South Dixie Highway in South Miami, Florida. • Existing use - currently vacant. • Proposed Project • 38,000 square feet (sf) of office • 9,000 gross leasable sf of retail space. • Project buildout is anticipated in 2008. 1.2 Study Area and Methodology - The intersections and segment analyzed were selected by the City of S. Miami • South Dixie Highway (US -1) /SW 73 Street (intersection) • SW 73 Street / SW 59 Court (intersection), • SW 74 Street (segment) 1.3 Project Site Information. • Access to and from the proposed site will be accommodated on SW 59 Court and SW 74 Street. • The driveway on SW 59 Court provides more direct access from South Dixie Highway (US -1). • This helps to minimize commercial traffic from using neighborhood streets. 2.0 EXISITNG TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 2.1 Roadway Characteristics were collected on South Dixie Highway, SW 74 Street, and SW 59 Court. 2.2 Traffic Counts — • Peak hour vehicle turning movement counts were collected at the two intersections during the morning (7 — 9 AM) and afternoon (4 — 6 PM) peak periods. • Twenty -four hour machine counts were collected on the segment. 2.3 Intersection Data • Existing signal timing data was obtained from Miami -Dade County • A field survey was conducted for intersection lane configurations. 2.4 LOS Analysis (Level of Service descriptions are attached) • Intersection analysis was based on The Highway Capacity Software (HCS), based on procedures of the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. • Segment analysis was conducted based on published Florida Department of Transportation Generalized LOS Tables. Existing Weekday Intersection and Segment LOS Analysis Intersection /Segment Signalized/ Unsignalized Level of Service AM7 PM South Dixie Highway (US -1) / SW 73 Street S B C SW 73 Street / SW 59 Court' U A/B AB SW 74 Streee Segment C C 'LOS for major /minor Street approach. Source: David Plummer & Associates 2Based on FDOT Generalized LOS Tables, 2002. 3.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 3.1 Background Traffic on the roadways just prior to the project completion was estimated by applying an annual growth rate to the traffic counts collected. The growth rate was based on historic volumes published by the Florida Department of Transportation. 3.2 Future without Project LOS Analysis was conducted for the intersections and segment using the volumes calculated for background traffic. 3.3 The traffic produced by the project is estimated based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers established methods. Project trip generation results in: • 86 total net new project trips during the morning peak hour • 76 entering • 10 exiting • 138 total net new project trips during the afternoon peak hour • 28 entering • 110 exiting 3.4 Project traffic was distributed and assigned to the study intersections and segment and driveways using methods established by Miami Dade County. Consideration was given to conditions such as the roadway network accessed by the project traffic, roadways available to travel in the desired direction; and attractiveness of traveling on a specific roadway. 3.5 Future with Project LOS Analysis was conducted for the intersections using the project traffic combined with the calculated background traffic. Levels of Service analysis results for both future conditions are summarized in the following table. Future Weekday Peak Hour Intersection and Segment LOS Analysis Intersection /Segment Signalized/ Unsignalized Without Project With Project AM PM AM PM South Dixie Highway (US -1) / SW 73 Street S C C C C SW 73 Street / SW 59 Court' U AB AB AB AB SW 74 Street2 Segment C C C C 'LOS for major /minor street approach. Source: David Plummer & Associates ZBased on FDOT Generalized LOS Tables, 2002 4.0 CONCLUSIONS 4.1 The intersection capacity analysis was performed at the intersections under study using vehicular volumes and the Highway Capacity Software (HCS), based on the procedures of the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Results of the future intersection analysis show that the intersections operate at acceptable levels of service during both the morning and afternoon peak hours. The analyzed segment has sufficient capacity for future volumes. 4.2 The City of South Miami has established a South Miami Hometown District Regulating Plan which designates the placement of driveways. The proposed driveway on SW 59 Court will provide a more direct access from South Dixie Highway (US -1), which helps to minimize commercial traffic from using neighborhood streets. Level of Service Description (General) LOS A describes primarily free -flow operations at average travel speeds. Vehicles are completely unimpeded in their ability to maneuver within the traffic stream. Control delay at signalized intersections is minimal. LOS B describes reasonable unimpeded operations at average travel speeds. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is only slightly restricted, and control delays at signalized intersections are not significant. LOS C describes stable operations; however, ability to maneuver and change lanes in mid -block locations may be more restricted than at LOS B, and longer queues, adverse signal coordination, or both may contribute to lower average travel speed. LOS D borders on a range in which small increases in flow may cause substantial increases in delay and decreases in travel speed. LOS D may be due to adverse signal progression, inappropriate signal timings, high volumes, or a combination of these factors. LOS E is characterized by significant delays. Such operations are caused by a combination of adverse progression, high signal density, high volumes, extensive delays at critical intersections, and inappropriate signal timing. LOS F is characterized by urban street flow at extremely low speeds. Intersection congestion is likely at critical signalized locations, with high delays, high volumes, and extensive queuing. South Miami 1 �® CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI t III[, OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER INTER- OFFICE MEMORANDUM 2001 To: The Honorable Mayor Feliu and Members of the City Commission Via: Yvonne S. McKinley, City Manager From: Julian Perez, Planning Dire Date: January 18, 2006 ITEM No. ' Subject: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO A REQUEST PURSUANT TO SECTION 20 -7.51 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOR A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN THE "SR(HD -OV)" SPECIALITY RETAIL (HOMETOWN DISTRICT OVERLAY) ZONING DISTRICT TO PERMIT SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS TO SECTIONS 20 -7.811, 20- 7.1011, 20 -7.11 IN ORDER TO: (1) ALLOW A TOTAL LOT COVERAGE OF 85% OR 26,833 SQUARE FEET WHICH EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM 60% LOT COVERAGE ON SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY AND THE MAXIMUM 50% LOT COVERAGE ON SW 74`h STREET; (2) ALLOW A BUILDING TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE OF 20,000 SQUARE FEET; (3) ALLOW A CURB CUT TO BE LOCATED ON SW 59`h COURT WHICH LOCATION IS NOT SHOWN ON THE HOMETOWN DISTRICT REGULATING PLAN; ALL FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 5966 -70 SOUTH DIXIE -HIGHWAY PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDI.NG AN EFFECTIVE DATE Background: The applicant, 64 Development Corporation, is requesting approval to construct a mixed use building on property in the SR(HD -OV) zoning district. The vacant site contains 31,523 square feet and has sides facing three streets. The project proposed will be a mixed use (office / retail) four story building with an integrated parking structure. There will be 38,233 square feet of commercial office and 11,052 square feet of retail space. The parking areas will contain more than the minimum required 191 parking spaces. The applicant is requesting three special exceptions to modify regulations pertaining to lot coverage, building size, and location of curb cuts. Special exceptions requested: Lot Coverage The applicant is requesting a waiver to allow a lot coverage of 26,833 square feet which is 85% of the total site. The Hometown Overlay District `s regulating graphic plan (Sec.20 -7.9B) limits lot coverage to 60% on S. Dixie Highway and 50% on SW 74"' Street. Maximum Sq.Ft. Per Building: The applicant's proposed structure contains 50,163 square feet of floor area and a ground floor of 26,833 square feet which exceeds Hometown Plan's 20,000 square feet maximum. Location of curb cut. The applicant's proposal shows dual access to the parking area from SW 74`' Street and from SW 59"'Court. The parking provisions contained in the Hometown Overlay District regulating graphic plan (Sec.20 -7.11) mandate the location of curb cuts. The plan shows a permitted curb cut on SW 74 "' Avenue, however, the proposed curb cut for the vehicle entrance on SW 59t1' Court is not shown. The applicant's third special exception is to permit the SW 591h Court curb cut. The granting of special exceptions require a finding by the City that seven criteria are applicable to the project. (Sec.20- 7.51). The Planning Department has compared the project to each of the seven criteria listed in the LDC, and has detennined that the proposed development advances the economic development of the City and is 2 compatible with land use, density, and design criteria established for the Hometown District. Based upon this review the Planning Department determined that the proposed development supports the granting of special exceptions. Traffic. Report: The applicant contracted with a consultant to prepare a traffic impact analysis for consideration prior to approval of the special exception. Attached is a copy of the study ( "5966 S. Dixie Highway-Traffic Impact Study ") carried out by David Plummer & Associates. The report concludes on p.16 that all roadways adjacent to the project were found to be operating during both the morning and afternoon peaks at acceptable levels of service and that there is sufficient capacity for future volumes. The study also confirms that the driveway entrance to the parking levels off of SW 59 "' Court will help minimize traffic from using neighborhood streets. Planning Board Action: The Planning Board at its November 29, 2006 meeting, after public hearing, adopted a motion by a vote of 4 ayes 2 nays (Ms. Beckman, Ms. Young) recommending approval with conditions of the special exception request. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Commission approve the three requested special exceptions for 5966 -70 S. Dixie Highway with the following conditions: (1) The applicant must agree that all street, sidewalk and street furniture improvements must be consistent with the design and material specifications as set forth by the City in its downtown street improvement program. (2) In compliance with LDC Sec. 20 -7.51 (C ) the proposed development must be consistent with the specific design of the building and site plan submitted as part of this application, identified as "5966 S. Dixie Highway" dated October 13, 2006 prepared by Mateu Architecture, Inc. (3) The applicant provides additional landscaping on the S. Dixie Highway side if permitted by the Florida Department of Transportation. Backup Documentation: Draft Resolution Planning Department Staff Report 11/29/06 Planning Board Meeting Excerpt 11/29/06 Survey/ Plans Traffic Impact Study Public Notices J P /SAY PAComm Items\2007 \1- 18- 07 \PB -06 -032 Spec Excep 5966 S Dixie CM Report.doc I RESOLUTION NO. 2 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH 4 MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO A REQUEST PURSUANT TO SECTION 20 -7.51 OF THE 5 LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOR A MIXED USE 6 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN THE "SR(HD -OV)" SPECIALITY RETAIL (HOMETOWN 7 DISTRICT OVERLAY) ZONING DISTRICT TO PERMIT SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS TO 8 SECTIONS 20 -7.8B, 20- 7.1011, 20 -7.11 IN ORDER TO: (1) ALLOW A TOTAL LOT COVERAGE 9 OF 85% OR 26,833 SQUARE FEET WHICH EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM 60% LOT COVERAGE 10 ON SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY AND THE MAXIMUM 50% LOT COVERAGE ON SW 74th 11 STREET; (2) ALLOW A BUILDING TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED BUILDING 12 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF 20,000 SQUARE FEET; (3) ALLOW A CURB CUT TO BE LOCATED 13 ON SW 591h COURT WHICH LOCATION IS NOT SHOWN ON THE HOMETOWN DISTRICT 14 REGULATING PLAN; ALL FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 5966 -70 SOUTH 15 DIXIE HIGHWAY PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN 16 CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE 17 18 19 WHEREAS, the 64 Development Corporation has submitted Application No. PB -06 -033 requesting 20 approval for three special exceptions necessary to construct a mixed use (office / retail) four story building 21 on property located at 5966 -70 S. Dixie Highway within the SR(HD -OV) zoning district, said project to 22 include 38,233 square feet of commercial office and 11,052 square feet of retail space and a total of 198 23 parking spaces; and 24 25 WHEREAS, the applicant is requesting special exceptions for lot coverage, maximum building 26 square footage, and curb cuts; and 27 28 WHEREAS, a special exception request in the Hometown Overlay District requires the Planning 29 Board's recommendation and approval by the City Commission; and 30 31 WHEREAS, after review and consideration, the Planning Department recommended approval 32 of the application with conditions ; and 33 34 WHEREAS, at its November 29, 2006 meeting the Planning Board after public hearing 35 voted 4 ayes 2 nays to recommend approval of the special exceptions with specific conditions; and 36 37 WHEREAS, the City Commission desires to accept the recommendation of the Planning 38 Board and enact the aforesaid resolution. 39 40 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF 41 THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: 42 43 Section 1. That the proposed construction of a mixed use (office / retail) four story building on 44 property located at 5966 -70 S. Dixie Highway advances the economic development of the City and is 45 compatible with land use, density, and design criteria established for the Hometown District, as set forth 46 in LDC Sec.20 -7.51, which includes seven criteria necessary for approving special exceptions: 47 48 (1) The proposed development contributes to, promotes and encourages the improvement of the 49 Hometown District and catalyzes other development as envisioned in the Hometown 50 District regulations. 51 52 53 1 2 (2) 3 4 (2) The proposed development is compatible with the land uses and development intensities 5 prescribed by all applicable city regulations. 6 7 (3) The proposed development must possess integrity of design compatible with the design 8 criteria established for the Hometown District and with the overall image of the city. 9 10 (4) The proposed development shall be designed in a manner that provides for effective 11 management of traffic (vehicular and pedestrian), parking, lighting, noise and waste 12 generated by the development, and management of the impacts of the development public 13 facilities and services. 14 15 (5) The proposed development does not expand the permitted uses within the Hometown 16 District. 17 18 (6) The proposed development will not have an unfavorable effect on the economy of the City 19 of South Miami. 20 21 (7) The proposed development, when considered cumulatively with other development, both 22 present and future, within the Hometown District, will not create excessive overcrowding or 23 concentration of people or population. 24 25 Section 2. That the subject application requesting a special exception to allow an overall lot coverage of 26 85% of the total site which exceeds the lot coverage of 60% on S. Dixie Highway and thee 50% on SW 74 27 Street as required by the Hometown Overlay District regulating graphic plan (Sec.20 -7.9) is hereby 28 approved subject to conditions set forth in Section 5 below. 29 30 Section 3 That the subject application requesting a special exception to allow the placement of a curb 31 cut/ driveway to be located on the SW 59th Court side of the building which location is not designated on the 32 Hometown. Overlay District Regulating Graphic plan (Sec.20 -7.11) is hereby approved subject to 33 conditions set forth in Section 5 below. 34 35 Section 4. That the subject application requesting a special exception to allow the building area to exceed 36 the Hometown Overlay District regulating graphic plan (Sec.20 -7.9; 20 -7.11) which limits ground floor 37 building square footage to 20, 000 sq. ft. is hereby approved subject to conditions set forth in Section 5 38 below. 39 40 Section 5 . The special exceptions set forth above as requested are approved subject to the following 41 conditions: 42 43 (1) The applicant must agree that all street, sidewalk and street furniture improvements must be 44 consistent with the design and material specifications as set forth by the City in its downtown 45 street improvement program. 46 (2) In compliance with LDC Sec. 20 -7.51 (C ) the proposed development must be consistent with the 47 specific design of the building and site plan submitted as part of this application, identified as 48 "5966 S. Dixie Highway" dated October 13, 2006 prepared by Mateu Architecture, Inc. 49 50 51 52 53 L 1 2 4 (3) 5 6 Section 6. This resolution shall be effective immediately after the adoption hereof. 7 8 9 PASSED AND ADOPTED this , day of , 2007. 10 11 12 13 ATTEST: APPROVED: 14 15 16 17 CITY CLERK MAYOR 18 19 Commission Vote: 20 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mayor Feliu: 21 Vice Mayor Wiscombe 22 Commissioner Palmer: 23 Commissioner Birts 24 Commissioner Beckman: 25 CITY ATTORNEY 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 so u T South Miami _All- AmericaCity INCORPORAfED C p R p 2001 To: Honorable Chair & Planning Date: November 29, 2006 Board Members From: Sanford A. Youkilis Acting Planning Director PR -06 -032 Re: Special Exception Request SR(HD -OV) Hometown Overlay 5966 -70 S. Dixie Highway Applicant: 64 Development Corp. Location: 5966 -70 South Dixie Highway A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO A REQUEST PURSUANT TO SECTION 20 -7.51 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOR A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN THE "SR(HD -OV)" SPECIALITY RETAIL (HOMETOWN DISTRICT OVERLAY) ZONING DISTRICT TO PERMIT SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS TO SECTIONS 20 -7.8B, 20- 7.10B, 20 -7.11 IN ORDER TO: (1) ALLOW A TOTAL LOT COVERAGE OF 85% OR 26,833 SQUARE FEET WHICH EXCEEDS THE- MAXIMUM 60% LOT COVERAGE ON SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY AND THE MAXIMUM 50% LOT COVERAGE ON SW 74th STREET; (2) ALLOW A BUILDING TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE OF 20,000 SQUARE FEET; (3) ALLOW A CURB CUT TO BE LOCATED ON SW 59t`' COURT WHICH LOCATION IS NOT SHOWN ON THE HOMETOWN DISTRICT REGULATING PLAN; ALL FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 5966 -70 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE SUMMARY OF REQUEST The applicant, 64 Corporation, is requesting approval to construct a mixed use building on property in the SR(HD -OV) zoning district. The vacant site contains 31,523 square feet and has sides facing three streets. The project proposed will be a mixed use (office / retail) four story building with an integrated parking structure. There will be 38,233 square feet of commercial office and 11,052 square feet of retail space. The parking areas will contain more than the minimum required 191 parking spaces. The applicant is requesting three special exceptions to modify regulations pertaining to lot coverage, building size, and location of curb cuts. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The special exception section in the Hometown Overlay District regulations (Sec.20 -7.51) allows for the City Commission to waive compliance with any of the requirements or standards in the chapter upon a finding that the proposed development complies with and implements seven economic and design objectives of the Hometown Overlay zone. These objectives are spelled out in the "Special Exception" section, which is attached. LDC Special Exception November 29, 2006 Page 2 of 4 The procedure for approving special exceptions requires a public hearing before the Planning Board and then a second public hearing before the City Commission. Both newspaper notice and mail notices are required. This process is spelled out in Sec, 20 -7.52, "Procedure for special exception ", which is attached. REQUESTED SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS Lot Coverage The applicant is requesting a waiver to allow a lot coverage of 26,833 square feet which is 85% of the total site. The Hometown Overlay District `s regulating graphic plan (Sec.20 -7.9B) limits lot coverage to 60% on S. Dixie Highway and 50% on SW 74th Street. Maximum Sq.Ft. Per Building The applicant's proposed structure contains 50,163 square feet with a ground floor area coverage of 26,833 sq.ft. which exceeds Hometown Plan's 20,000 square feet maximum. Location of curb cut. The applicant's proposal shows dual access to the parking area from SW 70 Street and from SW 59th Court. The parking provisions contained in the Hometown Overlay District regulating graphic plan (Sec.20 -7.11) mandate the location of curb cuts. The plan shows a permitted curb cut on SW 74th Avenue, however, the proposed curb cut for the vehicle entrance on SW 59th Court is not shown. The applicant's third special exception is to permit the SW 59th Court curb cut. STAFF OBSERVATIONS • The proposed development incorporating two major land uses is consistent with the objectives of the Hometown Overlay District Mixed. Use standards specified in LDC Sec.20- 7.2(E). • The proposed development is consistent with the specifications set forth in LDC Sec. 20- 7.2(D): a height limit of 4 stories (56 feet); a non - residential floor area ratio of 1.59 ( maximum FAR pennitted is 1.6); the retail ground floor area is more than the minimum 20% of the gross floor area. The special exception for the proposed curb cut for the vehicle entrance on SW 59th Court is an appropriate request because it will become the only entrance and exit for vehicles to the upper or lower floors of the parking garage. The SW 74th Street entrance will be for parking on the first floor only (29 spaces); there will be no access to the other levels of the garage. This will limit the number of vehicles entering and leaving the parking areas from SW 74th Street which is residential on the south side. • The Hometown Overlay District regulating graphic plan (Sec.20 -7.8 and Sec. 20 -7.10) mandates that lot coverage may not exceed the 60 % on S. Dixie Highway properties and 50% lot coverage on SW 74th Street properties. The special exception request is to allow an 85% overall lot coverage. This is a result of a building design which incorporates the required parking as an internal garage. The Zoning Task Force and the Planning Board have both recognized that the lot coverage issue is a deterrent to unified development projects and have included in the revised Land Development Code draft a provision increasing the Hometown Overlay District Regulating Plan lot coverage to "....80% maximum, i arage construction Provides all required Parkin, „ • The Hometown Overlay District regulating graphic plan (Sec.20 -7.7 -Sec. 20- 7.11) mandates that all buildings be limited to 20,000 square feet. This concept to encourage a number of small buildings on each block runs counter to today's development patterns and construction costs and is a deterrent to multi -level mixed use development, a major objective of the Hometown Plan. The applicant's request for a special exception / waiver of the 20,000 square foot building size is appropriate. • The granting of special exceptions require a finding by the City that the below listed seven conditions LDC Special Exception November 29, 2006 Page 3 of 4 are applicable to the project. (Sec.20- 7.51): (1) The proposed development contributes to, promotes and encourages the improvement of the Hometown District and catalyzes other development as envisioned in the Hometown District regulations. (2) The proposed development is compatible with the land uses and development intensities prescribed by all applicable city regulations. (3) The proposed development must possess integrity of design compatible with the design criteria established for the Hometown District and with the overall image of the city. (4) The proposed development shall be designed in a manner that provides for effective management of traffic (vehicular and pedestrian), parking, lighting, noise and waste generated by the development, and management of the impacts of the development on public facilities and services. (5) The proposed development does not expand the permitted uses within the Hometown District. (6) The proposed development will not have an unfavorable effect on the economy of the City of South Miami. (7) The proposed development, when considered cumulatively with other development, both present and future, within the Hometown. District, will not create excessive overcrowding or concentration of people or population. The applicant, in a letter dated October 9, 20061 (Compliance Criteria), provides their analysis as to how the proposed project complies with the City's special exception criteria. The Planning Department has compared the project to each of the seven criteria listed in the LDC, and has determined that the proposed development advances the economic development of the City and is compatible with land use, density, and design criteria established for the Hometown District. Based upon this review the Planning Department finds that the proposed development supports the granting of special exceptions. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Staff was concerned about the impact of traffic on the streets which contain exits and entrances to the development. The applicant contracted with a consultant to prepare a traffic impact analysis for consideration prior to approval of the special exception. Attached is a copy of the study ( "5966 S. Dixie Highway-Traffic Impact Study ") carried out by David Plummer & Associates. The report concludes on p.16 that all roadways adjacent to the project were found to be operating during both the morning and afternoon peaks at acceptable levels of service and that there is sufficient capacity for future volumes. The study also confirms that the driveway entrance to the parking levels off of SW 59`x' Court will help minimize traffic from using neighborhood streets. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Board approve the all three of the requested special exceptions for 5966 -70 S. Dixie Highway with the following conditions: (1) The applicant must agree that all street, sidewalk and street furniture improvements must be LDC Special Exception November 29, 2006 Page 4 of 4 consistent with the design and material specifications as set forth by the City in its downtown street improvement program. (2) In compliance with LDC Sec. 20 -7.51 (C ) the proposed development must be consistent with the specific design of the building and site plan submitted as part of this application, identified as "5966 S. Dixie Highway" dated October 13, 2006 prepared by Mateu Architecture, Inc. Attachments: Application / location Map Applicant's Letter on Hardship Applicant's Letter on Compliance with Criteria Survey/ Plans LDC Sec. 20- 7.51/.52 Traffic Impact Study Copies of Public Notices SAY P:\PB \PB Agendas Staff Reports\2006 Agendas Staff Reports \11- 29- 06 \PB -06 -032 Special Excep 5966 S Dixie.doc City of South Miami PB -06 -032 Hometown Special Exceptions - Lot Coverage, Building Square Footage, Curb Cuts 5966 -70 S. Dixie Highway F CD to 0 ---1 7000 7020 0 C) n r° W 7040 Q 7109 C) 7051 (n 7090 L1 z cp X110 • V- � 7171 G U) U SW 72ND ST 0 6180 0 o 'o r N n 0 N 0 o 0 P N I 1 6900 _ 5°ry �O h� \A/ 70 7001 ,a C, m o v o 0 m IA d' a N p to W CO W 7541 (D 7 V N 7563 to 1O o `U') 7548 V7 0 ---1 7000 7020 0 C) n r° W 7040 Q 7109 C) 7051 (n 7090 L1 z cp X110 • V- � 7171 G U) U SW 72ND ST 0 6180 0 o 'o r N n 0 N 0 o 0 P N I 1 6900 _ 5°ry �O h� \A/ 70 SW 71 ST ST = rn LO r rn o u, SUNSET DR 6110 595 o° 6150 7606 L7621 7601 7600 7601 7600 7621 7615 7616 7620 7621 7620 7637 7620 7 CO In CO M ss 0 0 mo m m 5800 CO CO 5859 LO 5829 W 73 RD ST 5824 0� o 7331 m °m SBSO 5875 1m I 5801 W SVV 141 H ILK 7001 ,a C, m a a n 7019 0 rn 0 m SW 71 ST ST = rn LO r rn o u, SUNSET DR 6110 595 o° 6150 7606 L7621 7601 7600 7601 7600 7621 7615 7616 7620 7621 7620 7637 7620 7 CO In CO M ss 0 0 mo m m 5800 CO CO 5859 LO 5829 W 73 RD ST 5824 0� o 7331 m °m SBSO 5875 1m I 5801 W SVV 141 H ILK _ 5890 m LO 5800 CF) 7515 7500 fI) 7541 7532 7563 to 1O o `U') 7548 V7 7611 5862 7610 7621 5864 7620 0 300 600 900 1,200 1,500 Feet Oct 02 06 10:04a Mateu Architecture 3052333326 p.7 City of South Miami Planning & Zoning Department City Hall, 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida 33143 Telephone: (305) 663 -6326; Fax: (305) 666 -4591 Application For Public Hearing Before Planning Board & City Commission A5 I Ht_ AI'I''LIGAN 1. PLEASE INDICATE YO.WR RELATIONSHIP TO THIS PROJECT: Owner _Owner's Representative Contract purchase _Option to purchase TenantlLessee 4PPL.ICATION IS HERESY MADE FOR THE FOLLOWING: �L.EASE CHECK THE APPROPRIATE ITEM: —Text Amendment to LDC _Variance Zoning Map Amendment Special Use a _ PUD Approval X pedal Exceptiono _ PUD Major Change _.Other 8rietly'explain application and cite specific Code sections: The unde correct to v2VCOGrU 4-20 W 6-0,1613 Subsection: Page it Amended Date: 'LEASE CHECK ALL THAT APPLY: +/ Letter of intern ✓Justifications for change gt sQJC.<o cticGr mot of o�ership or letter from owner ?current survey (1 original sealed and signed/1 reduced copy @ 11" x 17 ") _ 1s copies of Site Plan and Floor Plans reduced copy Q 11' x 17" _ 2,17% Property owner signatures Mailing labels (3 sets) and map Required Fee(s) has read this compp�eted ap plication and represents that the information and all submitted materials are true and of the applicant's dowle ge and belief. and title Date Upon ipt, applications and all submitted materials will be reviewed for cornp�iance witb the Land De lo Code and other applt a regu adons. Applications found not in compliance will be rejected and returned to the applicant. OFFICE USE ONLY. Date Fled Date of PB Hearing Date of Commission Petition Required Petition Accepted Method of Pa rnertt 8/2!00 r 64 DEVELOPMENT iCORPORATION October 9, 2006 Mr. Sanford Youkilis City of South Miami Planning & Zoning Department 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, FL 33143 Re: 5966 & 5970 South Dixie Highway - Letter of Intent Dear Mr. Youkilis, Please accept this letter of intent for the proposed new development located at the site referenced above. The entire site consists of 5966 and 5970 South Dixie Highway totaling 31,975 square feet of land. We are proposing a 4 story structure that will contain retail space on the ground floor, office spaces in.the upper two floors and a parking garage consisting of spaces in the basement, 2nd and 3rd levels. The total proposed FAR for the project is 50,163 where 50,436 square feet is allowed. The site fonts on South Dixie Highway as well as SW 59 Court and SW 74 Street. This proposed development is designed to meet all of the Hometown District Overlay ordinances except for lot coverage and building size limit to 20,000 square feet for which we are submitting an application for public hearing before the Planning Board and City Commission. Our current zoning district is Specialty Retail (SR) which normally allows lot coverage of 90 %. The Hometown District Overlay allows only 60% when fronting South Dixie Highway. Our proposed plan requests an 85% lot coverage. Please review our entire application and do not hesitate to contact me if you need any additional information. Sincerer f f Marcelo Fernandes �r Vice President 7500 RED RD • SOUTH MIAMI, FL • 33143 PHONE: 305 -663 -1293 • FAX: 305- 665 -0272 WEB SITE: OXFORDUNIVERSAL.COM E -MAIL: BMFT ENTERPRISES, INC. A DIVISION OF THE OXFORD GROUP 64 DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION October 9, 2006 Mr. Sanford Youkilis City of South Miami Planning & Zoning Department 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, FL 33143 Re: Statement of Hardship & Justification for Change 5966 & 5970 South Dixie Highway Dear Mr. Youkilis, Attached please find a site plan and floor plans for my proposed new development located at the site referenced above. The entire site consists of 5966 and 5970 South Dixie Highway totaling 31,523 square feet of land. We are proposing a 4 story structure that will contain retail space on the ground floor, office spaces in the upper two floors and a parking ga a 98 spaces in the basement, 2nd and 3rd levels. The total proposed FAR for the project is 50,436 quare feet where 50 163 feet is allowed. As you can see from the site plan, the site is very irregularly shaped with nine sides and fronting three streets: South Dixie Highway, SW 59 Court and SW 74 Street. Regardless of this challenging site configuration, this proposed development is designed to meet all of the Hometown District Overlay (HDO) ordinances except for lot coverage for which we are submitting this application for public hearing. Our current zoning district is Specialty Retail (SR) which normally allows lot coverage of 90 %. The HDO allows only 60% when fronting South Dixie Highway. Our proposed plan requests 85% lot coverage. In order to comply with all the other ordinances, we have designed a parking structure that extends below grade as well as occupying the majority of the 2nd and 3rd floors. The other floors have been set back and reduced in size to create an architecturally interesting structure that mirnimi7es the presence of the garage. In reviewing the site plan, the design of the parking structure is on the first two floors while the office spaces suspend above to create the visual concept of an interesting architectural sculpture rather than a building. The parking is so well incorporated in to the design that the first two floors of parking are not visible along the heavily traveled fron tage of South Dixie Highway. In keeping with the HDO's purpose to design parking that "must be developed and managed primarily as an element of infrastructure critical to enhancing South Miami's tax base through economic success of the district" -we have designed a parking structure that maximizes this need while it is visually appealing and practically hidden. Our site plan does not surpass the lot coverage requirement in the standard SR zoning requirement. It is important to consider that an open air, asphalted parking lot would be allowed in the HDO but then we would loose the much needed parking spaces in the city and be left with a much less visually pleasing structure. Please review o r entire application and do not hesitate to contact me if you need any additional information. Sincerely, Marcelo' ern andes Vice Pr` sident 7500 RED RD • SOUTH MIAMI, FL • 33143 PHONE: 305 -663 -1293 • FAX: 305 -665 -0272 WEB SITE: OXFORDUNIVERSAL.COM E -MAIL: BMFT ENTERPRISES, INC. A DIVISION OF THE OXFORD GROUP 64 DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION October 9, 2006 Mr. Sanford Youkilis City of South Miami Planning & Zoning Department 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, FL 33143 Re: 5966 & 5970 South Dixie Highway — Compliance Criteria Dear Mr. Youkilis, Please - accept this letter of compliance as an additional supplement to my application for public hearing on the property referenced above. I would like to address each special exception provision as found in section 20 -7.51 of the South Miami Land Development Code. 1. Our proposed development does contribute, promote and encourages the improvement of the Hometown District (HD). and catalyzes other development as envisioned in the HD regulations. The development allows for access to the building by pedestrians or vehicles on each of the 3 streets that it fronts. The design also allows for landscaping to be placed on both SW 59 Court and SW 74 Street. The development also implements the mixed use of retail on the first floor and offices on the top two floors to maximize the land use categories as found in traditional downtowns. 2. The proposed development is compatible with the land uses and development intensities prescribed by all the applicable city regulations. The only special exceptions being requested are lot coverage and building size as stipulated by the HD overlay. The proposed lot coverage and building size are within the allowances of the Specialty Retail zoning district for which the property is currently zoned. 3. The proposed development possess integrity of design compatible with the design criteria established for the HD and with the overall image of the city. We believe the uniqueness of the design and quality of materials will definitely make this one of the flagship buildings of the city. 4. The proposed development is designed in a manner that provides effective management of traffic. Access is available via all 3 streets along with an underground parking level. Our 198 on -site parking spaces exceed the requirements needed. Based on the current uses of the neighboring properties, (New Chinatown restaurant, Foxes Lounge, gas station, auto mechanic shop and other retail) the proposed development will produce the least amount of lighting, noise and waste impact to the neighborhood. 5. The proposed development does not expand the permitted uses within the HD. This development proposes a mixed use of retail and offices. 6. The proposed development will have a favorable effect on the economy of the City of South Miami. By bringing in additional retail and office space that is much needed in the city, this development is able to absorb all the parking for which it is designed with a surplus to spare. The unique design will establish a new higher level of architectural standard to the city especially along the highly visible boulevard of South Dixie Highway. 7500 RED RD • SOUTH MIAMI, FL • 33143 PHONE: 305- 663 -1293 • FAX: 305 -665 -0272 WEB SITE: OXFORDUNIVERSAL.COM E -MAIL: BMFT ENTERPRISES, INC. A DIVISION OF THE OXFORD GROUP -2— October 16, 2006 7. The proposed development will not create excessive overcrowding or concentration of people. Visually speaking the 50,000 square feet building does not crowd the site at all. On the contrary, the design of the upper floors create an illusion that they are suspended in the air. These floors are also set back on all sides to create space between each neighboring property. The use of underground parking, as well as hidden levels of parking above ground, assist in minimizing the congestion of buildings in the HD while addressing the much needed office and retail space to help vitalize the city. Please review our entire application and do not hesitate to contact me if you need any additional information. Sincerely, MarceloF X andes Vice Pres dent 20 -7.51 SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE 20 -7.51 Special exception.. (A) The city commission may, by special exception, waive strict compliance with the provisions of the Hometown District Overlay Ordinance [this article]. In granting a special exception, the city commission must find by substantial competent evidence that: (1) The proposed development contributes to, promotes and encourages the improvement of the Hometown District and catalyzes other development as envisioned in the Hometown District regulations. (2) The proposed development is compatible with the land uses and development inten- sities prescribed by all applicable city regulations. (3) The proposed development must possess integrity of design compatible with the design criteria established for the Hometown District and with the overall image of the city. (4) The proposed development shall be designed in a manner that provides for effective management of traffic (vehicular and pedestrian), parking, lighting, noise and waste generated by the development, and management of the impacts of the development on public facilities and services. (5) The proposed development does not expand the permitted uses within the Hometown District. (6) The proposed development; will not have an unfavorable effect on the economy of the City of South Miami. (7) The proposed development, when considered cumulatively with other development, both present and future, within the Hometown District, will not create excessive overcrowding or concentration of people or population. (B) The city commission, in granting any special exception, may prescribe any reasonable conditions, restrictions, and limitations it deems necessary or desirable, in order to preserve and promote the intent of the Hometown District Overlay Ordinance. (C) Special exceptions, if granted, shall be valid only for the specific design shown in the plans and exhibits submitted as part of the special exception application, as provided in Section 20 -7.52 of this Code. All deviations from the requirements of the Hometown District Overlay Ordinance incorporated within and reflected on the site plan and exhibits shall be considered a part of the application. Approval of the site plan and exhibits by the city commission shall constitute approval of the nonuse deviations identified on the site plan and exhibits unless the city commission approves a motion to the contrary. No further individual or separate application for deviations approved by the city commission shall be required. If the applicant wishes to make material changes to the design subsequent to receiving a special exception, the applicant must apply for a new special exception following the procedure set forth herein. (D) Special exceptions, if granted, shall be valid if development, as defined in Section 380.04, Florida Statutes, commences within twenty -four (24) months from the date of final approval and is substantially completed within five (5) years from the date of issuance of the s Supp. No. 7 180 HOMETOWN DISTRICT OVERLAY ORDINANCE 20 -7.52 first building permit. The time for substantial completion may be extended by the city commission upon application filed prior to the expiration of the substantial completion period and upon demonstration of good cause. (Ord. No. 19 -94 -1569, § 1, 11 -1 -94) 20 -7.52 Procedure for special exception. (A) Special exceptions under Ordinance No. 19 -94 -1569 [Sections 20 -7.51, 20 -7.52] may be granted only after a minimum of two (2) public hearings. The first public hearing shall be before the planning board, at which time the planning board shall review the project and provide to the city commission an advisory recommendation regarding approval, approval with conditions, or disapproval. The second public hearing shall be held before the city commission and shall be held no sooner than seven (7) calendar days following the planning board hearing. Public notice requirements, as specified in Section 20- 5.5(C) and (G), Applications requiring public hearings, shall be followed. (B) Requests for special exceptions under Ordinance No. 19 -94 -1569 [Sections 20 -7.51, 20 -7.521 shall be in a form acceptable to the city manager and shall include each exhibit required per Section 20- 7.3(B), Application for Development Permit, and per Section 20 -7.4, Site Plan Requirements. In addition, the city commission, at its discretion, may require additional exhibits and may defer approval of the special exception application or schedule an additional public hearing or hearings to review those exhibits. (C) The city manager shall have authority to require additional review and approval by the environmental review and preservation board for developments involving special exception, which review shall follow the procedure set forth in Section 20 -5.11 of this Code. (D) The city commission may grant a special exception upon four (4) affirmative votes of its members. (Ord. No. 19 -94 -1569, § 1, 11 -1 -94) Supp. No. 7 181 MIAMI DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays Miami, Miami -Dade County, Florida STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADE: Before the undersigned authority personally appeared O.V. FERBEYRE, who on oath says that he or she is the SUPERVISOR, Legal Notices of the Miami Daily Business Review f /Wa Miami Review, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami in Miami -Dade County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a Legal Advertisement of Notice in the matter of CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI - PUBLIC HEARING - 11/29/2006 ITEM: PS -06 -032 - PB -06 -033 - PB -06 -034, ETC. in the XXXX Court, was published in said newspaper in the issues of 11/17/2006 Affiant further says that the said Miami Daily Business Review is a newspaper published at Miami in said Miami -Dade County, Florida and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Miami -Dade County, Florida, each day (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Miami in said Miami -Dade County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he or she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, comm or refund for the purpose Of securing thys adverti ent for ublication in the said newspaper n Sworn to and subscribed before me this 17 day of NOVEMBER , A.D. 2006 (SEAL) y�`�a+ Cheryl N Harmer My Commission DD338559 O.V. FERBEYRE personally kn¢ Expires July 18,2ocs OF 'Q MENT PROJECT IN THE -S11#46-115V)- SPECIALITY RETAIL'(HOME TOWN.: = DISTRICT.: OVERLAY) <.ZONING,:DISTRICT.. TO;- PERMIT; SPECIALEXCEPTIONS TO.SECTIONS 20-7.88, 20.7.10B, 20 -7.11 IN i .ORDER TO': (1) ALLOW A.TOTAL_LOT COVERAGE,OF 85 %-,OR, 26,833 SQUARE FEET WHICH EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM 60% LOT { COVERAGE ON SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY AND -THE MAXIMUM 50%; LOT COVERAGE ON SW 74th STREET; (2) ALLOW A BUILDING TO .HAVE - 50,163 SQUARE FEET WHICH EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM :PERMITTED BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE,OF 20,000 SQUARE rr-I,.1r /.I'. ..r --- - ....----.• -CO URT:WHICH LOCATIONS NOT -SHOWN ON THE HOMETOWN ,DISTRICT REGULATING PLAN; ALL FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY `LOCATED„AT 5966 -70, SOUTH DIXIE ,HiGHWAY PROVIDING FOR; SEVERABILITY; _'PROVIDING FOR: ORDINANCES'. IN. CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE ;Applicant: Habitat for Humanity Location: 6350 S W 6O Avenue A RESOLUTION OF .THE ,MAYOR .S CITY ..COMMISSION OF THE CITY.OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO A REQUEST.FOR TWO VAPJANCEt" FROM' SECTION 20- 3.5(D) OF ;.THE .LAND.; DEVELOPMENT, CODE.I ;O NRDER MALLOW THE- CONSTRUC -; JION OFA 'TWO .,STORY SINGLE FAMILY :HOME ON PROPERTY ;.LOCATED,;`AT 6350 SW_;60 AVENUE, -SOUTH MIMI, FLORIDA, .WITHIN THE RS-47, SINGLE FAMILY. RESIDENTIAL.- ZONING. USE i DISTRICT;:THE VARIANCES_ REQUESTED_ ARE (1) A, VARIANCE TO' ALLOW THE: LOT SIZE OK 'A BUILDING SITE TO, BE :4796 j SQUARE FEET. WHERE A. MINIMUM LOT SIZE OF, 6000 SQUARE FEET IS REQUIRED AND V FEET OF FRONTAGE WHERE. 60 FEET IS ,REQUIRED; (2) A VARIANCE :TO .PERMIT AN INTERIOR:SIDE iYARD SECOND STORY SETBACK TO BE 9 FEET 91NCHES WHERE .10 FEET IS REQUIRED; PROVIDING FORAN EFFECTIVE DATE PB- 06-034 Applicant: „ Habitat for Humanity 1-ocatioiv 6016 SW 63 Street A RESOLUTION ,;OF THE `MAYOR &CITY COMMISSION .OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO A REQUEST FOR r�rVARIANCES FROM SECTION,20 -3.5(D) OF;THE .LAND DEVELOP' 7`MENT. CODE IN ORDER -TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A; ONE STORY SINGLE FAMILY HOME ON PROPERTY.:LOCATED AT` 6016 SW 63 STREET, SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, WITHIN THE .RS-4 SINGLE FAMILY .;RESIDENTIAL'_ ZONING .,USE- , DISTRICT: ,THE VARIANCE REQUESTED IS TgALLOW A REARSETBACK TOBE 23 FEET 10 INCHES WHERE A MINIMUM OF 25 FEET IS REQUIRED, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE PB -06 -035 - Applicant: _City of South Miami l , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY_ COMMISSION OF.THE CITY.OF.SOUTH,MIAMI, FLORIDA; =: RELATING TO: CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY; AMENDING 0-4 _SECTION.2,7(J) OF THttiti'S LLAND DEVELOPMENT CODE IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FOR PUBLIC WORKS REVIEW OFSITE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF,CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY; PROVIDING FOR,SEVERABILITY, ORDWANCES IN CONFLICT AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE PB- 06-036 Applicant:.: City "of South Miami AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION. OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FI_ORIDA RELATING TO'dERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY; ,AMENDING, SECTION'20- 5.16`RELATING TO UNITY.OF TITLE; CREATING SUBSECTION 26- 5.1.6(F) TO PROVIDE FOR THE OPTION OF USING A.DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE. COVENANTS IN 'LIEU OF: UNITY ;`OF. TITLE; '°PROVIDING. `FOR SEVERASILITY,- ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND.AN EFFECTIVE DATE.. ?. P13-06- 037 ". Applicant;; •City of South Miami AN ORDINANCE OF.THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION.OF THE CITY OF „SOUTH, MIAMI,- ;FLORIDA;',RELATINGTO ?THE ;LAND. DEVELOPMENT. CODE; ;AMENDING "kdTION _20 -8:16 RELATING_ TO'_UNITY OF TITLE; PROVIDING FOR THE OPTION OF; USING ,A �DECLARATION OF. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS IN LIEU OF UNITY OF TITLE; PROVIDING TOR SEVERABILITY, ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE %III interested parties are urged to attendl Objections or expressions of, approval may be made in person at the-heari g "o�filed in venting prior to or at the hearing.The Planning Board reserves the right to recommend to the City Commission whatever,the boartl considers in the best interest rest , for the area involved. interested parties requesting information are asked to.contact the Planning and Zoning Depaitmentbq calving X05 -663 -6326 or writing to the address indicated above: You are hereby advised that if any person_desires jo appeal any decision made with respect to 'any matter considered at this meeting or hearing.,' such person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose .may need to ensure'ihat a verbatim record of the proceedings.is'made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon urhich the appeal is'to be based (F S.'286 0105). Refer to hearing number when making any inquiry. - 11l17 _. ' 06- 3- 11/752468M - NOTICE OF,PUBLIC.HEARING CITY OF_SOUTH MIAMI aOl 7p -. Planning Department j •6130 Sunset Drive; South Miami, Florida 33143 Phone: (305) 663 6326 Fax #_(305) 668-7356 r On Wednesday, November 20,'2006 at 7:30 PM , the City of- South. Miami Planning Board will conduct public hearings in,tre City Commission Chambers at the above address on the following items PB -06 -032 Applicant. _ 64 Development Corp- Location:, 5966-70 South Dixie Highway A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMIS SION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING -TO. A REQUEST: PURSUANT-TO SECTION 20 -7.51 OF THE LAND - DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR SPECIAL .EXCEPTIONS FOR A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN THE "SR(HD -OV) ";SPECIALITY RETAIL (HOMETOWN DISTRICT OVERLAY) ZONING DISTRICT TO PERMIT SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS TO SECTIONS 20 -7.813, 20- 7.10B, 20 -7.11 IN ORDER TO: (1) ALLOW A TOTAL LOT COVERAGE OF 85% OR 26,833. SQUARE FEET WHICH EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM 6.0% LOT COVERAGE ON SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY .AND THE MAXIMUM 50% LOT COVERAGE ON SW 74TH STREET; (2) ALLOW A BUILDING TO HAVE 50,163 SQUARE FEET WHICH. EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE OF:20,000 SQUARE-FEET; (3) ALLOW A CURB CUT TO BE LOCATED ON SW 591e-COURT _WHICH LOCATION. IS NOT SHOWN ON THE HOMETOWN DISTRICT ;REGULATING PLAN; ALL FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 5966 -70 SOUTH DIXIE.: HIGHWAY PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING. FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE PB -06 -033 Applicant: _Habitatfor Humanity. .Location: = 6350 SW 60 Avenue A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR & CITY COMMISSION OF THE-CTTY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO A REQUEST FOR TWO VARIANCES FROM SECTION 20-3.5(D) OF -THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO - -STORY SINGLE FAMILY HOME ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT. 6350 SW 60 AVENUE, SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA; WITHIN. THE ;" RS- 4'::SINGLE, FAMILY .RESIOENTIAL =ZONING ,USE DISTRICT, THE VARIANCES REQUESTED ARE: (1) A VARIANCE TO ALLOW THE LOT SIZE OF A BUILDING SITE TO BE -.4796.; SQUARE FEET WHERE A MINIMUM LOT SIZE OF 66D0 SQUARE FEET IS REQUIRED AND 47 FEET OF FRONTAGE WHERE 60 FEET IS REQUIRED; (2) A VARIANCE _TO PERMIT AN INTERIOR SIDE YARD SECOND.STOHY SETBACK TO BE 9 FEET 9 INCHES WHERE_ 16 FEET IS REQUIRED, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE PB O6 034 ' Applicant Habitat for Humanity Location. - 6016 SW 63 Street z- y A RESOLUTION. OF THE MAYOR-& CITY COMMISSION OF THE `CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO A REQUEST FOR .VARIANCES FROM SECTION 20= 3.5(D) OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A ONE STORY.' SINGLE FAMILY HOME ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT .6016 SW 63 STREET, SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, WITHIN THE "RS -4" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING USE DISTRICT; THE VARIANCE REQUESTED IS TO ALLOW. A. REAR SETBACK :;TO -BE 23 FEET;10 INCHES WHERE A MINIMUM OF 25 FEET IS REQUIRED PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE , PB 06 035 Applicant. City of South Mlarni AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI; FLORIDA, RELATING TO CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY; AMENDING SECTION 20- 43(J) ,OF THE CITY'S LAND DEVELOPMENT, CODE IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FOR PUBLIC WORKS REVIEW OF SITE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE P8 O6 036 Applicant City of South Miami ; AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, •FLORIDA,'RELATING TO CERTIFICATES OF.000UPANCY, AMENDING SECTION 20 -5:16 RELATING TO UNTTY.OF TITLE; CREATING SUBSECTION 20- 5.16(F) TO PROVIDE FOR THE OPTION OF USING A DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS IN LIEU OF -UNITY OF TITLE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT, AND AN EFFECTIVE - - PB -O6 037 Applicant: City of South Miami AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY. COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AMENDING SECTION 20-8.116, RELATING TO UNITY OF TITLE; PROVIDING FOR THE OPTION OF USING A DECLARATION -OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS , _LIEU_ OFUNITY: :OF ;:TITLE, PROVIDING FOR - $EVERABILITY, ORDINANCES IN CNFLICT. AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE NI interested padies are urged to attend. Oblections or expressions of approval maybe made In parson at the hearing or riled in Yrrlgng prior to or at the hearing. The Planning Board reserves the right to recommend to lh "" commission whatever the board considers In the best Interest for the area involved Nterested pa ties requesting information a e asked m oontect the Planning and Zoning Oepanment by ca ing 305 -663 6326 or wrigng fa the address ndicated above• Yob are hereby advised that If any person desires to`appeal any decision made with respect to any matlw considered al this meeting oP hearing, such person _11 need a record of the "proceedings, and tor. such pu pose. may need th ensure that a ver�at m rocoid of the proceedings Is made, which neon includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal ts. to be based (ES. 286.0105). peter to hearing number whan making any inquiry 16 ._ • N N w .. m �w z a W x . a. i • w x L . E o.. ro MIAMI DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays Miami, Miami -Dade County, Florida STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADE: ;' CITY OF SOUTH'MIAMI NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS Before the undersigned authority personally appeared SOOKIE WILLIAMS, who on oath says that he or she is the NOTICE IS HEREBY given that the City Commission of the City of South . VICE PRESIDENT, Legal Notices of the Miami Daily Business Mimi;'. Florida "will 'conduct- Public Hearings during`its regular City. Review f /k/a Miami Review, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday CO. mrnis-sion meeting onrTuesday, January. 9, 2ow) beginning_at;7:30 irnthe City,Commissiori Chambers, 6130 Sunset Drive, to consider. and Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami in Miami -Dade County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, p m -, A RESOLUTION OE THE MAYOR AND CITY, COMMISSION OE being a Legal Advertisement of Notice in the matter of THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI; FLORIDA;. RELATING REQUEST PUR$UANT.TO`SECTION 5T:OF THE LAND _ DEVELOPMENT. CODE FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOR A CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI MIXED USE DEVELOPMENTPROJECT I. E,- _SR(HD OV)" PUBLIC HEARINGS JANUARY 9, 2007 SPECIALITY RETAIL, (HOMETOWN_',DISTRICT OVERLAY) -. 20NING DISTRICT`TO PERMIT SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS TO. in the XXXX Court, SECTIONS 20 -7.813, 26 -7.1013, 20 -7:11 IN. ORDER TO:- (1) . ALLOW A TOTAL_ LOT. COVERAGE OF OR� 2. 6,833 was published in said newspaper in the issues of ,. SOUARE-_FEET WHICH EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM 60% LOT' COVERAGE ON ; SOUTH w DIXIE.. ,HIGHWAY AND, 12/29/2006 MAXIMUM•.;50% LOT. COVERAGE ON SW4,74th�STREET,- (2)< ALLO.W A,; BUILDING TO EXCEED 'THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED BUILDING_ SQUARE. FOOTAGE OF ,.26,000 j Affiant further says that the said Miami Daily Business SQUARE FEET 3) ALLOW A CURB. CUT 30 BE LOCATED Review is a newspaper published at Miami in said Miami -Dade ON SW 59th COURT WHICH LOCATION IS NOT SHOWN ON County, Florida and that the said newspaper has THE HOMETOWN' DISTRICT REGULATING PLAN; ALL FOR- PROPERTY " GENERALLY -' LOCATED AT -- 5966 -70 heretofore been continuously published in said Miami -Dade County, SOUTH DIXIE.HIGHWAY PROVIDING FOR- SEVERABILITY- Florida, each day (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) PROVIDING FOR; .ORDINANCES. IN . CONFLICT, AND and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Miami in said Miami -Dade County, Florida, for a PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE �'' period of one year next preceding the first publication of the A RESOLUTION OF:THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he or THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA RELATING TO. THE . 7. sh either paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation ISSUANCE, OF A; CERTIFICATE' OF APPROPRIATENESS y disc nt, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose TO ,SECTION;; 20- 5.19(E)(3) , OE THE'.; LAND Irecur' g this advertisement for publication in the said ,PURSUANT DEVELOPMENT-;::CODE .: FOR-,.THE,, REPLACEMENT OF n wsp er. WINDOWS IN A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT .; 6250- MILLER. ROAD WITHIN THE_: CAMBRIDGE LAWNS ' HISTORIC_ DISTRICT, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE ' - Inquiries -conct ming this item should be _directed to the Planning "and Zoning Department Office at 305 - 663 -6326. Sworn to and subscribed before me this ALL interested parties are invited to attend and will be heard. 29 ECEM`B�'y A.D. 2006 " Maria M. Menendei,'CMC CSoUt rk .. City of South ml Pursuant to Florida Statutes - 286.0105, the - City hereby advises the public that ifJa person "decides to appeal any decision made by this Board, Agency (SEAL) or Commission with respect. to any matter considered at its meeting or hearing he or she will need'a record of the proceedings, and that for such SOOKIE WILLIAMS personally known to me purpose, affected person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made Which record includes the.testimony a ` nd evidence ; appeal is to be based. P,c, Maria I. Mesa rW �"€ upon Which the 12/29; 06- 3- 35/768240M • PJIy Commission D0293856 ` 4 pct Expires f0arch 04, 2003 ww�. �WO Z W ;ENr fi WQo °o2, C1 i0LL VWO<=N 0> OOowiml wlKO!i €""zo O 00zj0 0i 3Z W FO'; 1y <2.N 00w1pOOF <o��QQ Z% sZd ;�WOZ woaaWO }� c� � mom °` = LLaLL �z :�y�N2 W�1yO.. ,LLFZz'OJINO LL � 'mo$mp� .e r6 W.eNZOzLLO OQLLHUZ r U', 9�yyIf9 jO01m-♦y <pK -CZypp6a° OL j YY011'OW W Wm� .a fi'JWL k, B 10 UW 53 OQ�`�1.GNz ax t:, U �'g E m . ZvvzW a G< ° C1 DW aJZZ .. 'n 4 1w9,am`i ;IN >EW Q �E$ 00°W W �p0 tlr O p er ; 12'. mg OW n n 0162 « ?...'Q�OgJQ• �WJ2 K S m i iTeF'ZW�6z$ 1 wa,- _WO�wQw�++.F,ZSeatd t�N9 O $p�� C ww LLW OCjC�j i�. E * 5n �qt �OOWK W-�JNZJ=J111 °.ryp==>NZ'oLL Oa -Qy�y,, O0Z034.J i.jt=u Go' W�VWgLLW Ca O.�f�K1C LL,O=LL- QL1N N6f0 .... U: Q.. .. ll n6 l$� m. gym; m E a L) r m m`m m 9- H m °nmm'vEgm mi Emm =owoca mr W Zm my n�imm� U p m 7 C am�NmNoom acv y N CJ D fi Q mama Q r,°mo���? 'mmmmn tgm L 0= T �v.on ma�oim c vtmnEcmS"�'po m E i x° J 6a °° n c m m m n app omE-m a.W� mEm o � ow I o _ ° 3 0 0 IC m' �_ n$ o$ m m � E m x9vm��2 a W H a xz c m ° P- n° .mm w G 02 wo fq h mN;m m U p W Q CaG a O LLy mW¢W emo u x� S om Ua m-c° �m r-a�9�=ujc, .-a m m WO 1- Q7 m m£ m JC �� @VCOW U yJ n `m , Z'e n m >>mc'COC b D W LL NU �V1 Q. 10 U.° F�j Ufl. .L-. C °Nmsrmn3 QICULILgOCmy 00C O N a co V O 0 0 N d' W m W 0 0 Z o. S LU r E E V) 0 °How about some crosswords ` wit your croissant ?" Nothing goes better with breakfast than The Miami Herald, delivered. 1- 800 -441 -0444 .: COURTESY NOTICE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA On Tuesday, January 9, 2007, beginning at 7:30 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, 6130 Sunset Drive, the City Commission will hold Public Hearings to consider the following items: AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO FRANCHISES; AUTHORIZING THE RENEWAL REQUEST BY ATLANTIC BROADBAND, L.L.C. FOR A TEN YEAR RENEWAL TERM, WITH�"� "'T ^ " " "T'^ °^ "' ° "'"' ;PEQ "N OPTION TO RENEW FOR AN ADDITIONAL FIVE YEAR TERM; PROVIDING FOR A FIVE PERCENT FRANCHISE FEE AS PROVIDED UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW; PROVIDING FOR STANDARDS OF INSURANCE; PROTOCOL FOR PROVIDING SERVICES. AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO DRAINAGE; AMENDING SECTION 1 OA -45 OF THE CITY'S CODE IN ORDER TO REQUIRE PROPERTIES TO RETAIN STORMWATER DRAINAGE ON SITE SO AS TO PREVENT DEVELOPMENT THAT WOULD RESULT IN CONTRIBUTING TO OR CAUSING RECURRENT OR EXCESSIVE PONDING ON ADJOINING PROPERTIES OR PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF- WAY AND TO AMEND THE PERMITTING PROCESS. SO AS TO ENSURE PROPER REVIEW AND DRAINAGE _ .. AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY; AMENDING SECTION 20 -5.16 RELATING TO UNITY OF TITLE; CREATING SUBSECTION 20- 5.16(F) TO PROVIDE FOR THE OPTION. OF USING A DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS IN LIEU OF UNITY OF TITLE. A RESOLUTION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOR A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN THE SPECIALITY RETAIL ZONING DISTRICT TO PERMIT SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS IN ORDER TO: (1)) ALLOW A TOTAL LOT COVERAGE OF 85% OR 26,833 SQUARE FEET WHICH ALLOW THE MAXIMUM 60% LOT COVERAGE ON SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY AND THE MAXIMUM 50% LOT COVERAGE ON SW 74th STREET, (2) ALLOW A BUILDING TO HAVE 50,163 SQUARE FEET WHICH EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE OF 20,000 SQUARE FEET; (3) ALLOW A CURB CUT TO BE LOCATED ON SW 59th COURT WHICH LOCATION IS NOT SHOWN ON THE HOMETOWN DISTRICT REGULATING PLAN; ALL FCR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 5966 -70 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY. ' A RESOLUTION RELATING TO A REQUEST FOR THREE VARIANCES FROM SECTION 20- 3.5(E) OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF ATWO STORY SINGLE FAMILY HOME ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6350 SW 60 AVENUE, SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, WITHIN THE "RS-4" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING USE DISTRICT; THE VARIANCES REQUESTED ARE: (1) A VARIANCE TO ALLOW THE LOT SIZE OF A BUILDING SITE TO BE 4796 SQUARE FEET WHERE A MINIMUM LOT SIZE OF 6000 SQUARE FEET IS REQUIRED AND 47 FEET OF FRONTAGE WHERE 60 FEET IS REQUIRED; (2) A VARIANCE TO PERMIT AN INTERIOR SIDE YARD SECOND STORY SETBACK TO BE 9 FEET 9 INCHES WHERE 10 FEET IS REQUIRED; (3) A VARIANCE TO ALLOW THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE SECOND STORY TO BE THE SAME SQUARE FOOTAGE (100%) AS THE FIRST . FLOOR WHERE THE MAXIMUM SIZE OF THE SECOND FLOOR IS TO BE LIMITED TO 60% OF THE FIRST FLOOR SQUARE FOOTAGE. A RESOLUTION RELATING TO A REQUEST FOR VARIANCES FROM SECTION 20- 3.5(E) OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A ONE STORY SINGLE FAMILY HOME ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT ¢1316 SW 63 STREET, SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, WITHIN THE "RS -4" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING USE DISTRICT THE VARIANCE REQUESTED IS TO ALLOW A REAR SETBACK TO BE 23 FEET 10 INCHES WHERE A MINIMUM OF 25.FEET IS REQUIRED. A RESOLUTION RELATING TO A REQUEST PURSUANT TO SECTION 20- 3.3(0) OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR A SPECIAL USE APPROVAL TO LOCATE AN ANIMAL HOSPITAL FACILITY IN THE "GR" GENERAL RETAIL ZONING USE DISTRICT SPECIFICALLY LOCATED AT 6394 S. DIXIE HIGHWAY. Above Items can be inspected in the City Clerk's Office, Monday Friday during regular office hours. If you have any inquiries on the above items please contact the City Clerk's office at: 305- 663 -6326. ALL interested parties are invited to attend and will be heard. Maria M. Menendez, CMC City Clerk Pursuant to Florida Statutes 286.0105, the City hereby advises the public that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by this Board, Agency or Commission with respect to any matter considered at its meeting or hearing, he or she will need a record of the proceedings, and that for such purpose, affected person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings Is made which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. 3 w» r Q nav COURTESY NOTICE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA On Tuesday, January 9, 2007, beginning at 7:30 p.m., in the City Or Commission Chambers, 6130 Sunset Drive, the City Commission will 141: ` hold Public Hearings to consider the following. items: ( A RESOLUTION RELATING TO A REQUEST PURSUANT TO SECTION 20 -7.51 I OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOR A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN THE "SR(HD -OV)" SPECIALITY rk,. RETAIL (HOMETOWN DISTRICT OVERLAY) ZONING DISTRICT TO PERMIT SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS TO SECTIONS 20 -7.8B, 20- 7.108, 20 -7.11 IN ORDER TO: (1) ALLOW A TOTAL LOT COVERAGE OF 85% OR 26,833 SQUARE FEET WHICH EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM 6DIA LOT COVERAGE ON #' f SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY AND THE MAXIMUM 50% LOT COVERAGE ON SW 74th STREET, (2) ALLOW A BUILDING TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE OF 20,000 SQUARE FEET; (3) ALLOW A CURB CUT TO BE LOCATED ON SW 59th COURT WHICH LOCATION IS NOT SHOWN ON THE HOMETOWN DISTRICT REGULATING PLAN; ALL FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 5966 -70 SDUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES g IN CONFLICT. A RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS PURSUANT TO SECTION 20- 5.19(E)(3) OF THE LAND i DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF WINDOWS IN A SINGLE�1 FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 6250 MILLER ROAD WITHIN THE CAMBRIDGE LAWNS HISTORIC DISTRICT. r' 1 e Above hems can be inspected in the City Clerk's Office, Monday - Friday during regular office hours. If you have any inquiries on the above items please contact the City Clerk's office at: r 305 - 663 -6326, �- ALL interested parties are invited to attend and will be heard. Maria M. Menendez, CMC t(" City Clerk \\ ¢I Pursuant to Florida statutes 286.0105, the City hereby advises the public that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by this Board, Agency or Commission with respect to any matter considered at its meeting or hearing, he or she will need a record of the proceedings, and that for such purpose, affected person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings Is rr made which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. ® Headaches. Pain Puaflef W r t L c Anxiety / A 7 1,10 i �rr£� Find out how stress is effecting your immune system. Come in for ak r 30 minute consultation: Call Today: X03 - 3595 -95 0 Acupuncture Physician 105 -06 N. Kendall Dr. www.acupuncturistmiami.com ��rs����� ?±��-.� �� � � ���_ -- ibab,�b��� -��� -' Ire 'Is���L,��:1�;i��;�,- 1��� -ll� WN vvvvvvvvvvvvv�vvv��s����® f i r' cn Q q m Z S.W. 5Mh PL N V a N ti a m E U a�A! � �iins.ii,�aF'x io's iiviii; "y °e.o ar. r xro• 7" y I2 4�- °2& P Li V! MM a$Q�Q E� �_y qqe -a= tag fill °NY3 i All m q — E U a�A! � �iins.ii,�aF'x io's iiviii; "y °e.o ar. r xro• 7" y I2 V 1 T� VJ Cn O C --i 2 0 X m C_ r- 0 z G) "n o z m r m O z 0 X m A4 T E U iN Ctnin��; av "z ao's i�iiib0 " "�"1e'°ur 3i ora�anO ma4n�a� a� °R +a Ufa ��fr. •t•eran w— w w w w w.w w w w w w w w w w w® O® VIP e C/) q O C m m D O z V .A �2 G m CD m r µ D 0 z cn co 4 111 !E E U 1.,&14 AjArle� m 0 ni aas °aa:awiis °i'absmn sn aua.aazs' ,� }wme z 0 m m 0 z t I 1 I 1 I 1 I , , , , ! ! I 1 I I 1 1 I f I I 1 5966 South Dixie Highway Traffic Impact Study Prepared by: David Plummer & Associates, Inc. 1750 Ponce de Leon Boulevard Coral Gables, Florida 33134 November 2006 DPA Project #06253 5966 South Dixie Highway Traffic Impact Study TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Listof Exhibits ......................................... .................:............. ... ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................... ............................... ............................iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................ ............................... 1.1 Project Background .......................................................... ........:.....................1 1.2 Study Objective .....................................................:........ .........:..................... l 1.3 Study Area and Methodology .... ............ :.................. ,...... ............................... 3 1.4 Project Site Information ................................................. ..............................3 2.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS .. :...................:......:........: .............................. 4 2.1 Roadway Characteristics .................................................. ............................... 4 2.2 Traffic Counts........... ........................................................ ..............................4 2.3 Intersection Data .....................................................:......... .............................. 6 2.4 Intersection LOS Analysis..... ....................... ............................... .:..................6 3.0 PLANNED AND PROGRAMMED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS .....................8 4.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS .....: ........................ ............................... `........... 9 4.1 Background Traffic And Committed Developments .............................................. 9 4.2 Future Without Project Intersection LOS Analysis.... ........... ..............................9 4.3 Project Trip Generation ........ ...... ....................................... .............................11 4.4 Project Trip Assignment . ... .... 12 4.5 Future With Project Intersection LOS Analysis .................. .............................14 5.0 CONCLUSIONS ......................................... .............................. ............................16 Appendix A: Site Plan Appendix B: Data Collection Appendix C: Intersection Capacity Analysis Worksheets Page i 5966 South Dixie Highway Trajc Impact Study LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit Page 1 Location Map ......................................................................................... ..............................2 2 Existing AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ........:..................... ............................... 5 3 Existing Lane Configurations ................................................................ ..............................7 4 Existing Intersection LOS Analysis ...................................................... ..............................6 5 Future without Project AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ........ .............................10 6 Future without Project Intersection LOS Analysis ............................... ..............................9 7 Project Trip Generation ........................................................................ .............................11 8 Cardinal Distribution Project ............................................................... .............................12 9 Project Trip Assignment ....................................................................... .............................13 10 Future Intersection Capacity LOS with Project .................................... .............................14 11 Future AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes with Project ............. .............................15 Page ii 5966 South Dixie Highway Traffic Impact Study EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposed project will be located 'at 5966 South Dixie Highway in South ;Miami, Florida. The site is currently vacant. The proposed development plan consists of 38,000 square feet (sf) of office and 9,000 gross leasable sf of retail space. Project buildout is anticipated in 2008. This traffic study is consistent with the methodology previously discussed with and agreed to by the City of South Miami Planning Department. An assessment of the traffic impacts associated with the proposed project was performed in accordance with the requirements of the City of South Miami. Results of the future with project capacity analysis show that the intersections operate at acceptable levels of service during both the morning and afternoon peak hours. The analyzed segment also has sufficient capacity for future volumes. Page iii 5966 South Dixie Highway Trafc Impact Study 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Background The proposed project will be located at 5966 South Dixie Highway in South Miami, Florida. (See Exhibit 1). The site is currently vacant. The proposed development plan consists of 38,000 square feet (sf) of office and 9,000 gross leasable sf of retail space. Project buildout is anticipated in 2008. This traffic study is consistent with the methodology previously discussed with and agreed to by the City of South Miami Planning Department. 1.2 Study Objective The purpose of the study is to provide a traffic study that meets the requirements of the City of South Miami for the project. This study includes vehicular flow, trip generation, and intersection/segment analyses. Page 1 5966 South Dixie Highway Traffic Impact Study 1.3 Study Area and Methodology The study methodology previously discussed with and approved by the City of South Miami is described as follows: • Capacity Anal. Capacity analysis was performed for the intersections of South Dixie Highway (US -1) / SW 73 Street and SW 73 Street / SW 59 Court, with segment analysis on SW 74 Street. • Background Traffic. Average. Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes, published by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) were reviewed to determine the appropriate background growth applicable to this area. This growth rate was applied to existing traffic counts to establish future traffic conditions without project for the anticipated project buildout year. • Project Traffic. Trip generation for the project was estimated using trip generation information published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 7th edition. Net new external project traffic was assigned to the adjacent street network using the appropriate cardinal distribution from the Metro -Dade Long Range Transportation Plan Update, published by the Metropolitan Planning Organization. • Future Traffic Conditions. Project traffic was combined with projections of future traffic without project. Intersection capacity analyses were performed for this condition. 1.4 Project Site Information The proposed project will be a multi -story building with office and retail space. The garage will provide 198 parking spaces. Access to and from the project site will be accommodated on SW 59 Court and SW 74 Street, 52% of the parking spaces are accessible from SW 59 Court and the remaining 48% from SW 74 Street. The driveway on SW 59 Court will provide a more direct access from South Dixie Highway (US -1), which helps to minimize commercial traffic from using neighborhood streets. A copy of the site plan is provided in Appendix A. Page 3 5966 South Dixie Highway Traffic Impact Study 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS Data collection for this study included roadway characteristics, intersection counts, signal timing, and seasonal adjustment factors. The data collection effort is described in the following sections. 2.1 Roadway Characteristics South Dixie Highway (US -1) South Dixie Highway is a major arterial that provides access throughout Miami Dade County and falls under FDOT jurisdiction. South Dixie Highway is a two -way, six -lane, divided roadway with exclusive turn lanes at major intersections. On- street parking is prohibited. SW 74 Street SW 74 Street is local road that provides east/west access from just east of SW 57 Avenue to where it terminates just west of the project site; it falls under City of South Miami jurisdiction. SW 74 Street is two -way, two -lane. On-street metered parking.is provided. SW 59 Court SW 59 Court is local road that provides a north/south connection from SW 73 ` Street to SW 74 Street; it falls under City of South Miami jurisdiction. SW 59 Court is two -way, two -lane. On street metered parking is provided. 2.2 Traffic Counts Peak hour vehicle turning movement counts were collected for the study area. Additionally, the FDOT weekly volume adjustment factor for Miami -Dade Co'dnty South corresponding to the date of the counts was used to adjust the raw traffic counts. The morning and afternoon peak period volumes are shown in Exhibit 2 and summarized in Appendix B. Page 4 C m PROIEGT: TRLE. E X SITING ExF+IBR No. pa 5966 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY AM AND PM PEAK HOUR 0 TRAFFIC STUDY TRAFFIC VOLUMES Page 5966 South Dixie Highway Traffic Impact Study 2.3 Intersection Data Signal timing data was obtained from Miami -Dade County for the signalized intersection analyzed in this study. ' This information was used for the signal phasing and aiming required for the intersection capacity analysis. A field survey was conducted to obtain the 'intersection lane configurations to be used in the intersection analysis. Exhibit 3 shows the existing lane configurations at the analyzed intersections. 2.4 LOS Analysis The Highway, Capacity Software (HCS), based on procedures of the 2000 Hihwav Capacity Manual, were used to perform intersection capacity, analysis at the analyzed intersections: Segment analysis was conducted based on the Florida Department of Transportation Generalized LOS Tables. Exhibit 4 shows the resulting LOS for existing conditions for morning and afternoon peak conditions. Analysis worksheets and FDOT Generalized LOS Table are included in Appendix C. Exhibit 4 Existing Intersection and Segment LOS Analysis` Weekday AM and PM Peak Hour Conditions Intersection /Segment Signalized/ Unsignalized Level of Service AM PM South Dixie Highway (US -1) / SW 73 Street S B ' C' SW 73 Street / SW 59 Courts U A/B A/B SW 74 Street' Segment C C LOS for major /minor Street approach, Source: David Plummer& Associates' 'Based on FDOT Generalized LOS Tables, 2002.' Page :6 VKU1tGI: UU: EXHIBIT No. 5966 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY EXISTING 0 1 TRAFFIC STUDY LANE CONFIGURATION 3 Page' 7 S966 South Dixie Highway Traffic Impact Study 3.0 PLANNED AND PROGRAMMED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS The 2006 Miami -Dade County Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and the 2030 Metro- Dade Transportation Plan Long Range Element, were reviewed to identify any programmed or planned projects within the limits of the study area established. These documents show no officially programmed or planned capacity improvement projects within the study area prior to completion of the proposed project. Page 8 5966 South Dixie Highway Trafc Impact Study i 4.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 4.1 Background Traffic and Committed Developments Average Daily Traffic counts published by the Miami -Dade Public Works Department and the ti FDOT were reviewed to determine historic growth in the area. This analysis indicated that traffic has fluctuated in the past years. A conservative 1.0% annual growth rate was used for this study. Per the City of South Miami, there are currently no planned projects proposed within the study f area. Therefore, only the growth rate was be applied to establish future without project volumes. f f 4.2 Future Without Project Intersection LOS Analysis f Future without project condition was obtained by establishing background traffic. Exhibit 5 shows I f the projected turning movements for future without project traffic. Exhibit 6 shows the resulting f LOS for morning and afternoon peak conditions for future without project. Capacity worksheets are included in Appendix C. f f 1 Exhibit 6 Future Without Project Intersection and Segment LOS Analysis 1 Weekday AM and PM Peak Hour Conditions 1 1 1 1 1 Intersection /Segment Signalized/ Unsignalized Level of Service AM PM South Dixie Highway (US -1) / SW 73 Street S C -C SW 73 Street / SW 59 Court' U AB A/B SW 74 Street Segment C C 1 'LOS for major /minor street approach. Source: David Plummer & Associates 213ased on FDOT Generalized LOS Tables, 2002 1 1 1 Page 9 1 1 6 SW 72 ST (SUNSET DRIVE) N.T.S. r + 15 (2) 75 (112) — 213 (378) `- 163 (246) J L 7 m SW 73 ST (1) 11 I� (121 109 —� 0 (1 20 r h v -- 88 (n0) SW 74 ST U (60) 70 W Ln LEGEND XX -AM PEAK VOL (XX) `PM PEAK VOL C PROJECT: ME` FUTURE W/O PROJECT EXHIBrr No. � d5966 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY p AM AND PM PEAK HOUR G N TRAFFIC STUDY TRAFFIC VOLUMES `� N O Page 10 i 5966 South Dixie Highway Traffic Impact Study a 4.3 Project Trip Generation Trip generation for the proposed project and the existing use was estimated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation manual, Seventh Edition. This manual provides i; gross trip generation rates and/or equations by land use type. These rates and equations estimate i; vehicle trip ends at a free- standing site's driveways. b The proposed development plan incorporates retail and office land uses, which can satisfy the retail needs for some employees and visitors without making a trip off -site. An internalization matrix was developed to establish the appropriate number of internal project trips. The Trip Generation Handbook, published by ITE in March 2001, the handbook includes data on ! pass -by trips. Pass -by trips are those trips that are attracted from the traffic passing the site on an adjacent street. Since the pass -by trips are already on the street system, the total trip generation from a site has to be adjusted to estimate the new external traffic actually added to the street ! system. Adjustments for internal and pass -b�y trips were taken when determining the proposed ! trips. The project trip generation summary is provided in Exhibit 7. ! ! Exhibit 7 ! Project Trip Generation Proposed Land Use Number of Units AM Peak PM Peak In Out Total In Out Total Retail 9,000 GLSF 0 0 0 11 14 25 (Land Use 814) Office 38,000 GSF 76 10 86 21 101 122 (Land Use 710) Subtotal 76 10 86 32 115 147 Pass -by Trips2 34% 0 1 0 0 -4 -5 -9 Net New Project Trips 76 10 86 28 110 138 'The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation manual, Seventh Edition Y Trip Generation Handbook, published by ITE in March 2001. Page 11 5966 South Dixie Highway Traffic Impact Study 4.4 Project Trip Assignment Project traffic was distributed and assigned to the study area using'` the Cardinal Distribution for TAZ 1103 shown in Exhibit 8. The Cardinal Distribution gives a generalized distribution of trips from a TAZ to other parts of Miami -Dade County. For estimating trip distribution for the project traffic, consideration was given to conditions such as the roadway network accessed by the project traffic, roadways available to travel in the desired direction, and attractiveness of traveling on a specific roadway. Project trip assignment for the proposed project is shown in Exhibit 9. Exhibit 8 Cardinal Distribution (TAZ 1103) Direction TAZ 1103 NNE 23.09% ENE 10.32% ESE ' 1.34% SSE 0.67% SSW 14.46% WSW 22.01 %' WNW 11.44% NNW 16.67% 0 PROJECT: WLE: EXHIBrr No. 5966 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY PROJECT TRIP TRAFFIC STUDY ASSIGNMENT Page 5966 South Dixie Highway Traffic Impact Study 4.5 Future With Project Intersection LOS Analysis Traffic projections for the project and forecasted background volumes were combined to obtain P J P J g future traffic with project at the analyzed intersections. Exhibit 10 shows the resulting LOS for the morning and afternoon peak conditions for future with project. Capacity worksheets are included in Appendix C. Exhibit 11 shows the projected turning movement volumes. Exhibit 10 Future With Project Intersection and Segment,LOS Analysis Weekday AM and PM Peak Hour Conditions Intersection /Segment Signalized/ Unsignalized Level of Service AM PM South Dixie Highway (US-1) / SW 73 Street S C C SW 73 Street / SW 59 Court U A/B A/B SW 74 Street2 Segment C C 1 1 I I 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 N O PROJECT: TITLE: FUTURE WITH PROJECT EXHIBIT No. 5966 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY AM AND PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC STUDY TRAFFIC VOLUMES 11 Page SW 72 ST (SUNSET DRIVE) J5 N.T.S. 5d h Qb /p1 < 76 (118) too m 15 (2) 164 (251) J d L �— 213 (378) `— 19 (11) SW 73 ST (1) 11 _j r 'Pep^o 1 (121) 109 —t (30)55--- 1 o co n Ln c PROJECT DWYS � (17) 2 � v y, (28) 3 v L.- 8 (3) v ---- 97 (175) SW 74 ST (93) 73 —► j (7) 19 Lo Lo LEGEND XX -AM PEAK VOL (XX) - PM PEAK VOL P O N O PROJECT: TITLE: FUTURE WITH PROJECT EXHIBIT No. 5966 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY AM AND PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC STUDY TRAFFIC VOLUMES 11 Page 5966 South Dixie Highway Traffic Impact Study 5.0 CONCLUSIONS An assessment of the traffic impacts associated with the proposed project was performed in accordance with the requirements of the City of South Miami. The City of South Miami has established a South Miami Hometown District Regulating Plan which designates the placement of driveways. The proposed driveway on SW 59 Court will provide a more direct access from South Dixie Highway (US -1), which helps to minimize commercial traffic from using neighborhood streets. The intersection capacity analysis was performed at the intersections under study using vehicular volumes and the Highway Capacity Software (HCS), based on the procedures of the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Results of the future intersection analysis show that the intersections operate at acceptable levels of service during both the morning and afternoon peak hours. The analyzed segment has sufficient capacity for future volumes. Page 16 Appendix A Site Plan ta J � 4Vl F L S.W. 691h PL 30'. 70TAL R/M 12„r a I � �I h` r A i 1 2r S.W. ten, CDURr Appendix B Data Collection Traffic Volumes Signal Timings 1. N Q 0) co 0) tM° I N Cl) O J Z Q Cl) Cl) O t') a') N. 0.... ;O rrr rr r r to O CD C4 co Ch LC) p '� O r- O CD O N 0 a- M W N LO N Of V' N r _ n r r r r N N O H 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. Cl Lu O d m Y d *J r N N N co � J to z_0 N t00 tp 80. y r d C O M a V 0 00000 000 z d1 to jp4,--- Z Z (n 00000000 y0 0 o Z ZZ, m CA 0 O oOOOO000 0 o u F- V V. V, H LL Z O O O O O O O O Z LL. W g J O W F , W J J W �- m N O C j co V CN') � 0 Ia- pi°j 0) cO > NM VCnv 0Lnv J: �a O. G p Z D v O O. O O O O O o Z O S p Z H 2 Z C OM M V toc07N O N �Q = �- O G) CO w N th v v v 0 v Q W N r p 3 H S Y ~ Yu �vtoOO r cow J &0 m _r x�� d E B .� +' CD 4) v co to rn r O N co N r- 2 Q J Q S t°. CO 0 O > coo ry CND' tl7 + ^O 0 C o U) Sc ui C M V Z N ` to r tr) r N O. r tO r .- t0 N N O M O S 'O O C 41=0 LO V) F- m 0 S m °) CD to cn O o N 0 r. n o r. co o O r r- 0) 'O y co c0 r- O uO to CD CD Z N R • z m 0. W O E 0 0 0 0 0 H p < o ea ` Z ) LO L O_ < O +�+. d7 Q Q Q 4 Q Q Q Q 0.. CO. °° p v y J c°q v °o r c°o c °o J o 0 v o 4. J O a>, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ui c �. N Q¢¢¢ ° Z oo c °o v Z o Y .c*°r Q: ° i� 0 r� 0 it 0 I- 0 m 0 dd 0 m 0 iA 0 io o w a O Z X U rn M r - J Q co Za 0) CO 0 •7 CD 1� fD ao O l) no Cl) t0 O o N N 'G E- 0 a r In CO CO � Q o rn O c •— M M � O N O r � 3 0 Z M M r� Cl) Cl) t1') � 0 O m H N CD R t!j � N M f� CD W ~ M C') co C•�1 [07 �7 fD ID m 0 oo 0 m 0 N of 0 d � v o c� e � Y 0 0 a+ 0 0 0 0 m 0 7 w O Z d1 i r r r 0 M r N �-- J 1— d C 0 (n P ti J a`cio N O Cl) M O N M N sf '� o y y � Z CA tfi O �t M N � c0 aO F" Z p ? Z m y OO CO � M N W O co U W I-- o M vL) U ZLL r Z t1,7 M r N W g J W W J � J LLJ > O O r N t- Cl) M V r rn o LO OC D J �a ~ Z Z C Z (� G O O D r- N N r a p 4r cp Z H 2 co v O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W O T� O r � O O O r N C) r N 0 Qa p J M co W li co X a E T O y Q J C', n p N 00 CO CO �1 � O co N O O N a) F- O _T 0 �V% Y V) M V Z N .� 3 O r O r N N M 0 O ~ c 00) 1t1 cq I— = W W O r N O O 00— IX O r � -hc Z (a U Z a w E J Q 5 Z = `m 0 U- v r ? ¢ o 0 C Q Q C < N L. C. JO o O Z C Y d o w 0 of o a 0 Z X U rn M r N CD R t!j M N M f� � is n 0 n 0 m 0 oo 0 m 0 m 0 of 0 � v o c� e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 X U rn M r to d1 N n coo v Cl) rn m d Fa- N o> Q J m Z Q 0 et to 0 7 �� rn o QOMLo044vmm O N T O N 0 f :[ Vi C* v z �d to IM c A J t0 N � nnrnrnco L `r-- coo to T M mr co O a LO N o o d :._ r 0 co o r CO CD CA o r M M r` C\j H m (n . G 0 N r It Q m: ct N N O F � 't U) to N N W t7 N N r N' N O ca m CL F d F-. w E I O O O O'. O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0j E- (D d L 0 ti Z C N 7 .O LL m2 m Y d d BOA �. *' aaao.a O to W to u-) tD V' to Cl) 01 t` N co d ,+L+ o. J N p G N J am' v oo � `t o J a 1�: 00 x p d C p. � m N a J O ¢ 0 0 0 0 .O 7 � 0 0 0 S o? � J Q CL 3 2 M 00000000 2 2 2 3 uJ F-' W p I- o z Ui Q fA O Z O O � C 0. C _ Z. y N r`„ W �L c0 Q c a 0 C 0 a 0 Z G 1n 0 N 0 Cl) 00000000 W a O z Np O m o z D: Z Z m Q W 00000 O oo w F- O V :.i(i H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z LL W a T-jo W W �" J > W N�Nmcov�� _J oa �� a n N m > nrnaoi.n ncoco J 0 o O f- ? z Z c!), 000b0000 Ma_ 0 oC o O _ 0 0 rn 0 N co n to n to t` D r- _Z Z C Q N W .,� co CAD O N~ Cl) : C = r U n C77 t` rn d- M to eh Q' W J N l09 UJ N a m to d1 N n coo v Cl) rn m d Fa- N o> m to 0 t0 to 0 7 O N T O N f :[ Vi C* v z �d LO N :._ r cc CO CD CA o r M M r` C\j H m (n . 0 N r It V 0 O O F AC 't U) to LO l0 to to LO Z N ca CL d F-. w E I O O O O'. O O O O J 'O - Q e9 L L 0 ti Z C N I LL m2 m BOA �. aaao.a IL CL o. o in p G N J am' v oo � `t o J a V 00 x p N a J O ¢ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S o? 2 2 2 M i 2 2 2 3 uJ F-' W p Z O O � C 0. C _ Z. y N c0 Q c a 0 C 0 a 0 V' 0 iti 0 1n 0 N 0 tfi 0 C c W a O z N X U 0 �I M ti Z Q Ln 0) T O O n 0 z 0 y r Cl) to to po f0 J Da) G 0) i— W co 0 0 x 0 0 O co M C � � O N T O N O O O M N m F- h- co CO co 0 T 0 00 Cl) 0) Y Q> y N Co O v a a`cic mmvM 0m°i a o CO 0 Z Z Cl) fM 0 N N to V' CD N y 0 =0: n E 0 m Z Z Z co M O 0 W - O N C�7 UU V �- LL Z LL Z T O T N O O O r LU J W H W G > J J W Tr000T Z Z Z 1- Z ii= Cl O Cl O 0 0 0 0 :) W F O 0 l0 O y fn o `D tm t OO 04 m 3. L) LL x N CO m a IM E A Lfl m w J O 0) M tf1 t� '� 00 CD OD IL N n p fn U) p Z m W O V' N M V V' T V' O � T O r O O O O H O Z ci Z Z d F- w N u7 M M I� V' tn IT J 0 5 EN 0 Z U- 0 V 0 `z g ¢ a d �' d a a a a a a a a a o LO "� M e °o , U) J oo V O a -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o fr N LU r2 F' W IL F- 2 a a a n, a CL a F- a _ Z O Lo OW� O g O W) Z p Y N O r) C O M Q p ¢ < 0 v 0 v 0 v 0 v 0 'n 0 .ii 0 iri 0 u'i 0 �n p W a O Z N X U 0 �I M ti DAVID KUMMER d ASSOCIATES. INC. - WESTBOUND - 1st 1/4 2nd' 1/4 3rd 1/4 4th 1/4 TOTAL 12 :0o AM 6 4 6 3 19 24 -HOUR COUNTS 6 5 2 4 16 Project Name: 5966 South Dixie Highway 3 1 2 8 Project No.: 06253 Location: 3 SW 74 Street West of SW 59 Court - 04:00 AM 2 2` Count Date: Average Observer: 05:00 AM Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 1 1 7 9 06:00 AM' 5 3 ;BEGIN 10 24 EASTBOUND 8 13 8 16 ' 45 08:oD AM 25 WO -WA TIME 1st 1!4 2nd' 1!4 3rd 1/4 4th 1!4 TOTAL 84 Os:00 AM `20' TOTAL 12:00 AM 3 4 2 5 14 22 25. 83 13- 15 i6 33 OtsOO AM 1' 2 1 ' 1 — 5 01:00 PM 16 18 12 18 20 - 02:00 AM 4 1 3 3 10 03:00 PM 15 21 19 18 18- 03:00 AM - 2,--- 2 1 . -1 6 ` 14 16 16 ` 13 59 06:00 PM 14 04:00 AM ` 1 2 1 1 3 12 10 10.- 42 06:00 PM 12 13 05:00 AM 2 1 1 2 5 4 5 28 - tOcoO PM 5 7 14 O6c00 AM 1 1 ` 6 6 13' 8 22 34 24 -HOUR TOTAL 1 013 37 Wc00 AM" 14 13 ' 20 18 64 108 > 08:00 AM 21 19 14 16 69 153 os:0o AM 21 28 24 ' 23 168 70:00 AM 16 21 14 • 17 150 11:00 AM 168 k72 198 188 199 180 210 225 183 126 101 81 62 56 2,690 DAILY TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY EASTBOUND AM Peak Hour. Time: 09:00 AM Volume: 96 AM Peak Hour: Time: 11:45 AM Volume: 120 PM Peak Hour. Time: 03:15 PM Volume: 77 PM Peak Hour. Time: '05:00 PM Volume: 167' EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND AM Peak Hour. Time: 11:45 AM Volume: 186 <K•factor. 6.9 %- PHF: 0.95 D- factor: 64.5% WB PM Peak Hour: Time: 05:00 PM Volume: 225 K- factor. 8.4% PHF: 0.96 D- factor. 74.0% WB -BEGIN WESTBOUND TIME 1st 1/4 2nd' 1/4 3rd 1/4 4th 1/4 TOTAL 12 :0o AM 6 4 6 3 19 07:00 AM ` 6 5 2 4 16 oz:oo aM 3 3 1 2 8 03100 AM 5 1 3 2 10 04:00 AM 2 2` 4 3 10- 05:00 AM 2 1 1 7 9 06:00 AM' 5 3 7 10 24 0�:0o AM 8 13 8 16 ' 45 08:oD AM 25 ^ 28 14 18 ` 84 Os:00 AM `20' 22 16 15 72- t0:00AM 16 22 22 25. 83 13- 15 i6 r 15 12:00 PM 21 13 , 18 20 01:00 PM 16 18 12 18 02:00 PM 18 i8 18 13 03:00 PM 15 21 19 18 04100 PM 20 16 20 ` 14 69 05:00 PM ` 14 16 16 ` 13 59 06:00 PM 19 12 15 c 10 56 07:00 PM 11 12 10 10.- 42 06:00 PM 12 13 9 10 " 44 04107) PM 9 1'1 4 5 28 - tOcoO PM 5 7 3 ` 5 20 11:00 PM 3 5 6 8 22 34 24 -HOUR TOTAL 1 013 -BEGIN WESTBOUND TIME 1st 1/4 2nd' 1/4 3rd 1/4 4th 1/4 TOTAL 12 :0o AM 6 4 6 3 19 07:00 AM ` 6 5 2 4 16 oz:oo aM 3 3 1 2 8 03100 AM 5 1 3 2 10 04:00 AM 2 2` 4 3 10- 05:00 AM 2 1 1 7 9 06:00 AM' 5 3 7 10 24 0�:0o AM 8 13 8 16 ' 45 08:oD AM 25 ^ 28 14 18 ` 84 Os:00 AM `20' 22 16 15 72- t0:00AM 16 22 22 25. 83 t:oo AM - 25 26 23 27 ` 100 12:00 PM 27 36 31 33 127 O1:o0 PM 36 _ 29 31 30 ; 125 112:00 PM 36 33 38 27 " 133 03:00 PM 28 26 27 28 109 .04:00 PM 39 32 33 - 38 - 141 05:00 PM 44 43 41 40 167 06:00 PM 37 35 31 25 12Z 07:00 PM 27 24 14 20 85 ` Ot1:00 PM 14 16 7 6 13 58 09:00 PM' 14- 15 13 13 54 10:00 PM 7 14 11 11 42 11:00 PM' 12 7 8 8 34 24 -HOUR TOTAL 1,677- DAVID PLUMMER E ASSOCIATES, INC. ;24 -HOUR? COUNTS Project Name: 5966 South Dixie Highway Location: SW 74 Street West of SW 59 Court Observer: Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. BEGIN EASTBOUND TIME 1st 114 2nd 1/4 3rd 1/4 4th 1/4 TOTAL 12:00 AM 3 3 2 5 13 01:00 AM 1 1 0 2 4 02:00 AM 3 0 0 4 7 03:00 AM 4 1 1 1 7 04:00 AM 0 3 0 0 3 05:00 AM 1 0 0 2 3 06 :00 AM 0 2 1 6 8 16 07:00 AM 11 14 17 16 58 08 :00 AM 18 17 13 12 60 09:00 AM 24 27 35 25 111 10:00 AM 16 22 13 16 67 11:00 AM 11 20 18 15 64 12:00 PM 24 17 21 14 1 76 01:00 PM 23 21 15 16 75 02:00 PM 14 9 17 19 59 03:00 PM 16 20 13 20 69 04:00 PM 26 21 25 13 85 05:00 PM 17 17 15 13 62 06:00 PM 18 13 13 18 62 07:00 PM 14 14 1 10 14 1 52 oe:0o PM 17 12 10 B 47 09:00 PM 9 14 2 7 '32. 10:00 PM 3 6 2 4 15 11:00 PM 3 4 4 11 L 22 24 -HOUR TOTALI 1,069 Project No.: Count Date: BEGIN WESTBOUND TIME 1st 114 2nd 1/4 3rd 1/4 4th 1/4 TOTAL 12:00 AM 9 7 6 3 25 01:00 AM 9 7 2 6 24 02:D0 AM 1 4 1 2 8 03:00 AM 7 1 1 3 12 D4 :00 AM 4 2 2 3 11 05:00 AM 2 0 1 4 7 06:00 AM 3 3 4 1 8 18 07:00 AM 12 12 7 19 50 08:00 AM 32 25 19 18 94 09:00 AM 25 22 16 16 79 10:00 AM 17 21 18 33 1 89 11:00 AM 24 26 32 24 106 12:00 PM 30 41 36 32 139 01:00 PM 41 36 33 36 146 02:00 PM 47 35 1 45 29 156 03:00 PM 33 19 25 29 106 04:00 PM 45 22 33 43 143 05:00 PM 41 25 44 42 1 152 06:00 PM 39 42 26 26 133 07:00 PM 33 24 18 23 98 08:00 PM 11 15 16 17 59 09:00 PM 1 1 13 13 7 46 10:00 PM 7 9 14 12 42 11:00 PM 10 9 6 6 31 24 -HOUR TOTAL 1,774 DAILY TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY EASTBOUND AM Peak Hour. Time: 09:00 AM Volume: 111 AM Peak Hour. PM Peak Hour: Time: 03:45 PM Volume: 92 _ PM Peak Hour. EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND AM Peak Hour. Time: 11:45 AM K- factor. 7.3% D- factor: 63.0% WB PM Peak Hour: Time: 04:00 PM K- factor. 8.0% D- factor: 62.7% WB 06253 I 11/15/06 Time: 11:45 AM Volume: 131 I Time: 05:30 PM Volume: 167 Volume: 208 PHF: 0.90 Volume: 228 PHF: 0.80 SW 74 St W of SW 59 Ct (111506).xis BEGIN r ` TIME ` WESTBOUND 1st 1/4 2nd ' 1!4 3rd 1/4 4th 1/4 TOTAL 12:00 AM; 3 1 6 3 DAVID PLUMMER B ASSOCIATES. WC_ 2 2 1 2 7 02:00 AM 5 1 1 1 8 03:00 AM 2 1 4 24 -HOUR COUNTS 7 -04:00 AM 0 1 5 Project Name: 5966 South Dixie Highway 05:00 AM t 1 0 Project No.: 06253 Location: 7 SW 74 Street West of SW 59 Court 10 11 30 07:00 AM: Count Date: 11116/06 Observer: 13 Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. o8:0oAM 18 30 >_9 17 ' -74 06:00 AM BEGIN 22 "EASTBOUND 13 65'` 1o:0oAM' 14 22 -25 16 WO -WA TIME 1st 1/4 2nd 1!4 3rd1/414th . 1!4 TOTAL 25 26 14 -, TOTAL 12:00 AM 3 5 2 4 14' 114 Ot:oO PM 31 22 28 23 27 otDD AM 1 2' 2'' ` 0 ' S' 03:00 PM- 23 33 29 26 111 12 02:00 AM 4 1 5 2 12 47- 60 37 37'` t81 O6:o0 PM 20 03:00 AM 0 2, <0 0 2 23 10 17 71 - 16 9. 04:00 AM 1 0' 1 1 3 12 19 - 6 18" 11 05:00 AM 2 1 1 2 6 9 24 -HOUR TOTAL 95T 17 06:00 AM 2 " 0' 5 3 10 40 07:00 AM i 6 11 23 19 69 108 OBioO AM 24 20 14 ' 19 77 151 Os:00 AM 18 ' 29 13 21 ' 81 146 10:00 AM 16 19 15 17 67 144 1t:00AM 14 9 14 <1A 145 12:00 PM 18'` 8 15 25 180 01:00 PM 8 9 19 154 02 :00 PM 21 ` i9 7 183 03:00 PM 13 25 15 185 04:ooRM 13 M14 15 14 192 05:o0PM 11 1f 1$ r25 236 06:00 PM 20 1B 2 170- 07:00 PM 7 9 6 102 OBa)O PM 7 14 8 11 96 Os:oo PM 9 7 5 2' 84 10:00 PM ` 7 8 ' 4 6' 67 1 1:00 PM 3 6 7 5 21 58 1124-HOUR 2,537 DAILY TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY EASTBOUND AM Peak Hour: Time: 07:30 AM Volume: 86 AM Peak Hour: Time: ` 11:45 AM Volume: 109 PM Peak Hour. Time: 01:45 PM Volume: 85 PM Peak Hour. Time: 05:00 PM Volume: 181 EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND AM Peak Hour. Timer 11.•45 AM Volume: 164 K- factor. 6.5% PHF: 0.95 D- factor. 66.5% WB PM Peak Hour: Time: 05:00 PM Volume: 236 K- factor. 9.3% PHF: 0.79 D- factor: 76.7% WB BEGIN r ` TIME ` WESTBOUND 1st 1/4 2nd ' 1!4 3rd 1/4 4th 1/4 TOTAL 12:00 AM; 3 1 6 3 13 01:00 AM 2 2 1 2 7 02:00 AM 5 1 1 1 8 03:00 AM 2 1 4 0 7 -04:00 AM 0 1 5 2 8 05:00 AM t 1 0 9 11 06:00 AM' 7 2 10 11 30 07:00 AM: 4' 13 9 13 39 o8:0oAM 18 30 >_9 17 ' -74 06:00 AM 15 22 15 13 65'` 1o:0oAM' 14 22 -25 16 77 11:00 AM 25 26 14 -, 29 - - 94`_ .12:00 PM ° 24 30 26 34 114 Ot:oO PM 31 22 28 23 104 `02:00 PM 25 30 31 24 110 03:00 PM- 23 33 29 26 111 04:00 PM` 32 41 33 33 139` O5:o0PM` 47- 60 37 37'` t81 O6:o0 PM 35 28 ' 35 23 121 21 23 10 17 71 - 16 17 15 8 56 M10:00pM 14 6 12 19 - 6 18" 10 F42 14: 4 10 9 24 -HOUR TOTAL 95T BEGIN r ` TIME ` WESTBOUND 1st 1/4 2nd ' 1!4 3rd 1/4 4th 1/4 TOTAL 12:00 AM; 3 1 6 3 13 01:00 AM 2 2 1 2 7 02:00 AM 5 1 1 1 8 03:00 AM 2 1 4 0 7 -04:00 AM 0 1 5 2 8 05:00 AM t 1 0 9 11 06:00 AM' 7 2 10 11 30 07:00 AM: 4' 13 9 13 39 o8:0oAM 18 30 >_9 17 ' -74 06:00 AM 15 22 15 13 65'` 1o:0oAM' 14 22 -25 16 77 11:00 AM 25 26 14 -, 29 - - 94`_ .12:00 PM ° 24 30 26 34 114 Ot:oO PM 31 22 28 23 104 `02:00 PM 25 30 31 24 110 03:00 PM- 23 33 29 26 111 04:00 PM` 32 41 33 33 139` O5:o0PM` 47- 60 37 37'` t81 O6:o0 PM 35 28 ' 35 23 121 21 23 10 17 71 - 16 17 15 8 56 M10:00pM 14 6 12 19 - 6 18" 10 F42 14: 4 10 9 24 -HOUR TOTAL 1;580 Signal Timings PATTERN SCHEDULE FOR 4804 US 1 & SW 73 ST FOR DAY # 4 (SECTION 1) TIME PT OFF ACG G Y R WG Y R CL Y R S Y M CYC MIN: 1 12 5 0 22. 48 18 39 4 1 12 4 2 0 0 0 3 80MID NITE 130 9�1 60 18 30 4 1 12 4 2 5 3 1 80LATE NIT 530 10 50 18130 4 1 12 4 2 5 3 1 80PRE AM A b25 17 . 37,' =.18 47.. 4 3 8 rI50AM: ",PEAK 930 20 37 18 87 4 1 15 4 2 5 3 1 140AM PEAK 1000 12 91 18 67 4 1 15 4 2 5 3 1 120POST AM ,. ;1535; =3 ,. 2? 18_,; '184: 1:40PM' :PEAK 1830'14 36 18 84 4 1 2 5 3 1 140PM PEAK 1900 1 9 18 70 4 1 12 4 2 5 3 1 120POST PM 2000 2 52 18 50 4 1 12 4 2 5 3 1 100EARLY EV 2200 7 52 18 40 4 1 12 4 2 5 3 1 90MID EVE 2300 13 60 18 29 4 1 13 4 2 5 3 1 80EARLY NI j 1� I I 1 I V �I b b b f R. AM 6966 South Dixie Highway Project Traffic Study - AM Assignment Intersection analysis.xis . EXISTING FUTURE Proposed Net New Project Trips FUTURE INTERSECTION MOVEMENT W/O WITH AM PROJECT PROJECT In Out Total PEAK HR 76 10 86 NBL 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 NBT 2559 2610 0.000 0.000 0 2610 NBR 96 98 0.300 0.000 23 121 SBL 35 36 0.150 0.000 11 47 SBT 1915 1953 0.000 0.000 0 1953 South Dixie SBR 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 Highway (U EBL 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 SW 73 Streeet et EBT 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 EBR 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 WBL 160 163 0.000 0.050 1 164 WBT 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 WBR 74 75 0.000 0.050 1 1 76 TOTAL 4839 4936 0.450 0.100 1 35 4971 NBL 15 15 0.000 0.100 1 16 NBT 1 1 0.000 0.000 0 1 NBR 7 7 0.000 0.050 1 8 SBL 3 3 0.000 0,000 0 3 SBT 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 SW 73 Street / SBR 6 6 0.000 0.000 0 6 SW 59 Court EBL 11 11 0.000 0.000 0 11 EBT 107 109 0.000 0.000 0 109 EBR 20 20 0.450 0.000 34 55 WBL 7 7 0.150 0.1D00 11 19 WBT 209 213 0.000 0.000 0 213 WBR 15 15 0.000 0,000 1 0 15 TOTAL 401 409 0.600 0.150 1 47 456 NBL 0 0 0.050 0.000 4 4 NBT 23 23 0.000 0.000 0 23 NBR 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 SBL 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 SBT 27 28 0.000 0.000 0 28 SW 59 Court/ SBR 0 0 0.600 0.000 45 45 Driveway EBL 0 0 0.000 0.150 2 2 EBT 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 EBR 0 0 0.000 0.250 3 3 WBL 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 WBT 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 WBR 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 TOTAL 50 51 0.650 0.400 52 103 NBL 0 0 0.000 0.000 O O NBT 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 NBR 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 SBL 0 0 0.000 0.200 2 2 SBT 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 SW 74 Street/ SBR 0 0 0.000 0.400 4 4 Driveway EBL 0 .0 0.250 0.000 19 19 EBT 69 70 0.000 0.000 0 70 EBR 0 0 0,000 0.000 0 0 WBL 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 WBT 84 86 0.000 0.000 0 86 WBR 0. 0 1 0.100 1 0.000 8 8 TOTAL 153 156 1 0.350 1 0.600 33 189 . EB 69 70 0.000 0.300 3 73 SW 74 Street WB 84 86 0,150 0.000 11 97 TOTAL 153 156 0.150 0.300 14 170 Intersection analysis.xis . EXISTING FUTURE Proposed Net New Project Trips FUTURE INTERSECTION MOVEMENT W/O WITH PM PROJECT PROJECT In Out Total : PEAK HR 28 110 138 NBL 0 0 0.000, 0.000 0 0 NBT 2152 - 2195. 0.000 0.000 0 2195 NBR 127 130 0.300 O.00D 8 " 138 SBL 28 ' 29 0.150 0.000 4 33 SBT 3247 3312 0.000 O.00D 0 3312 South Dixie SBR 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 Highway (US -1j7 Hi gh EBL 0 0 0.000 0.000 .0 0 SW 73 Street EBT 0 0 ` 0.000 0.000 0 0 EBR 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 WBL 241 246 0.000 0.050 6 251 WBT 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 WBR 110 112 0.000 0.050 6 118 TOTAL 5905 6024 0.450 0.100 24 ` 6047 NBL 20 20 0.000 0.100 11 31 NBT 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 NBR 13 13 0.000 0.050 6 19 SBL 2 2 O.D00 0.000 0 2 SBT 0 0 - 0.000 0.000 0 0 SW 73 Street I ' SBR 1 1 0.000 0.000 0' 1 _ SW 59 Court EBL 1 1 0.000 0.000 0 1 EBT 119 121 0.000 O.D00 0 121 EBR 17 17, 0.450 0.000 13 30 WBL 7 7 ` 0.150 0.000 4 11 WBT 371 378 0.000 O.00D 0 378 WBR 2 2 0.000 1 0.000 0 2 TOTAL 553 564 0.600. 0.150 33 597 NBL 0 0 0.050 0.000 1 1 NBT 33 34 0:000 0.000 0 34 NBR 0 0 0.000 O.00D 0 0 SBL 0 _ 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 SBT: 24, 24 0.000 0.000 0 24 SW 59 Court/ SBR 0 0 0.600: 0.000 17 17 Driveway EBL 0 0 0.000 0.150 17 17 EBT 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 D EBR 0 0 0.000 0.250 28' 28 WBL 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 WBT 0, 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 WBR 0 0 0.000 1 0.000 0 0 TOTAL 57 58 0.650 1 0.400 62 120 NBL 0 0 0.000 0:000 0 0 ' NBT 0 0 0.000 O.00D 0 % 0 NBR 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 SBL 0 .. 0 0.000 0.200 22 22 SBT 0 0 0.000 O.DOO 0 .0 SW 74 Street I SBR 0 0' 0.000 0.400 43 43 Driveway EBL 0 0 0.250 0.000 7 7 EBT 59 60 0.000 0.000 0 - 60 EBR 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 ' 0 WBL 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 WBT 167 - 170 0.000 0.000 0 170 WBR 0 0 0.100 1 0.000 3 ' 3 TOTAL 226 231 0.350 0.600 75 305 EB 59 60 O.D00 0.300 33 93 SW 74 Street WB 167 170 0.150 0.000 4 175 TOTAL 226 231 0.150 0:300 37 268 } TABLE 4 - 4 GENERALIZED PEAK HOUR TWO -WAY VOLUMES FOR FLORIDA'S URBANIZED AREAS* UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS FREEWAYS Interchange spacing> 2 mi. apart Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D 2 Undivided 180 620 1,210 1,720 4 Divided . 1,940 3,140 4,540 5,870 6 Divided 2,900 4,700 6,800 8,810 STATE TWO -WAY ARTERIALS Class I ( >0.00 to 1.99 signalized intersections per mile) Lanes Divided A Level of Service B C D 2 Undivided ** 400 1,310 1,560 4 Divided 460 2,780 3,300 3,390 6 Divided 700 4,240 4,950 5,080 8 Divided 890 5,510 6,280 6,440 FREEWAYS E 1,610 sss *** Class II (2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) Interchange spacing> 2 mi. apart Level of Service Level of Service E Lanes Divided A B Level of Service E 2 Undivided ** 2,370 Lanes A B C D E 6,670 4 2,310 3,840 5,350 6,510 7,240 10,010 6 3,580 5,930 8,270 10,050 11,180 13,130 13 4,840 8,020 11,180 13,600 15,130 20,560 10 6,110 10,110 14,110 17,160 19,050 Class IV (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile and within 12 7,360 12,200 17,020 20,710 23,000 E 1,610 sss *** Class II (2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) Level of Service Level of Service Lanes Lanes Divided A B C D E 2 Undivided ** 180 1,070 1,460 1,550 4 Divided ** 390 2,470 3,110 3,270 6 Divided ** 620 3,830 4,680 4,920 8 Divided ** 800 5,060 6,060 6,360 Class III (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile and not within primary city central business district of an urbanized area over 750,000) Interchange spacing <2 mi. apart BICYCLE MODE (Note: Level of service for the bicycle mode in this table it based on roadway geometrics at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of bicyclists using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two -way maximum service volumes.) Level of Service Lanes A B C D E it 2,050 3,350 4,840 6,250 7,110 fi 3,240 5,250 7,600 9,840 11,180 8 4,420 7,160 10,360 13,420 15,240 10 5,600 9,070 13,130 16,980 19,310 12 6,780 10,980 15,890 20,560 23,360 BICYCLE MODE (Note: Level of service for the bicycle mode in this table it based on roadway geometrics at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of bicyclists using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two -way maximum service volumes.) Lanes Divided A B C D E 2 Divided Yes +5% 2 Undivided ** ** 450 950 1,200 2 Undivided No -20% 4 Divided *' ** 1,050 2,070 2,400 Multi Undivided Yes -5% Source: Florida Department of Transportation 02/22/02 Multi Undivided No -25% Systems Planning Office 605 Suwannee Street, MS 19 ONE -WAY FACILITIES Tallahassee, FL 32399 -0450 Decrease corresponding two-directional volumes in this table by 40% to http: / /wwwl I.myflorida.com/plarming /systems /srWlos/default.htm obtain the equivalent one directional volume for one-way facilities. *This table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications. The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific planning applications The table and deriving computer models should not be used for corridor or intersection design, where more refined techniques exist. values shown we hourly two-way, volumes for levels of service and are for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated. Level of service letter grade thresholds are probably not comparable across modes and, therefore, cross modal comparisons should be made with caution. Furthermore, combining levels of service of different modes into one overall roadway level of service is not recommended. To convert to annual average daily traffic volumes, these - Volumes most be divided by an appropriate K factor The table's input value defaults and level of service criteria appear on the following page Calculations are based on planning applications of the Highway Capacity Manual, Bicycle LOS Model, Pedestrian LOS Model and Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, respectively for the automobileltruek, bicycle, pedestrian and bus modes. *•Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults. Not applicable for that level of service letter grade. For automobile/truck modes, volumes greater than level of service D become F because intersection capacities have been reached. For bicycle and pedestrian modes, the level of service letter grade (including F) is not achievable. because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input value defaults. 91 Paved Shoulder Level of Service Bicycle Lane Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D E Coverage A B C D E 2 Undivided ** ** 500 1,200 1,470 0-49% ** ** 310 1,310 >1,310 4 Divided ** «* 1,180 2,750 3,120 50 -84% ** 240 390 >390 * "* 6 Divided ** "" 1,850 4,240 4,690 85 -100% 300 680 >680 * ** * ** 8 Divided "* *" 2,450 5,580 6,060 PEDESTRIAN MODE Class IV (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile and within (Note: Level of service for the pedestrian mode in this table is based on roadway primary city central business district of an urbanized area geometrics at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of pedestrians over 750,000) using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number Level of Service of directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes.) Lanes Divided A B C D E Level of Service 2 Undivided ** "* 490 1,310 1,420 Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E 4 Divided ** ** 1,170 2,880 3,010 0 -49% "* "* ** 600 1,480 6 Divided ** ** 1,810 4,350 4,520 50 -84% ** ** ** 940 1,800 8 Divided ** ** 2,460 5,690 5,910 85 -100% ** 210 1,080 >1,080 * ** BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route) NON -STATE ROADWAYS Major City/County Roadways (Buses per hour) Level of Service (Note: Buses per hour shown are only for the peak hour in the single direction of higher traffic now.) Lanes Divided A B C D E Level of Service 2 Undivided ** ** 870 1,390 1,480 Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E 4 Divided ** OF 2,030 2,950 3,120 0 -84% '* >5 >4 >3 >2 6 Divided ** ** 3,170 4,450 4,690 85 -100% >6 >4 >3 >2 >1 ARTERIAL/NON -STATE ROADWAY ADJUSTMENTS Other Signalized Roadways DIVIDED/UNDIVIDED (signalized intersection analysis) (alter corresponding volume by the indicated percent) Level of Service Lanes Median Left Thins Lanes Adjustment Factors Lanes Divided A B C D E 2 Divided Yes +5% 2 Undivided ** ** 450 950 1,200 2 Undivided No -20% 4 Divided *' ** 1,050 2,070 2,400 Multi Undivided Yes -5% Source: Florida Department of Transportation 02/22/02 Multi Undivided No -25% Systems Planning Office 605 Suwannee Street, MS 19 ONE -WAY FACILITIES Tallahassee, FL 32399 -0450 Decrease corresponding two-directional volumes in this table by 40% to http: / /wwwl I.myflorida.com/plarming /systems /srWlos/default.htm obtain the equivalent one directional volume for one-way facilities. *This table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications. The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific planning applications The table and deriving computer models should not be used for corridor or intersection design, where more refined techniques exist. values shown we hourly two-way, volumes for levels of service and are for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated. Level of service letter grade thresholds are probably not comparable across modes and, therefore, cross modal comparisons should be made with caution. Furthermore, combining levels of service of different modes into one overall roadway level of service is not recommended. To convert to annual average daily traffic volumes, these - Volumes most be divided by an appropriate K factor The table's input value defaults and level of service criteria appear on the following page Calculations are based on planning applications of the Highway Capacity Manual, Bicycle LOS Model, Pedestrian LOS Model and Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, respectively for the automobileltruek, bicycle, pedestrian and bus modes. *•Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults. Not applicable for that level of service letter grade. For automobile/truck modes, volumes greater than level of service D become F because intersection capacities have been reached. For bicycle and pedestrian modes, the level of service letter grade (including F) is not achievable. because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input value defaults. 91 HCS +: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 ,l Analyst: DPA Inter.: SW 73 St / US -1 Agency: Area Type: All other areas Date: Jurisd: South Miami, F1 Period: Existing AM -Peak Hour - - Year -- -- - Project ID: 5966 South Dixie Highway - #06253 'i E1W St: SW 73 Street N/S St: US -1 I' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY RTOR Vol 0 ( 0 1' �. Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations N Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru A h Right Right A Peds Peds d WB Left A SB Left A A �! Thru Thru A A Right A Right Peds Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 15.0 115.0 5.0 ;Yellow 4.0 4.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 1.0 1.0 ! Cycle Length: 150.0 secs 1 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate 1 Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS !'Eastbound Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R ( L T R No. Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 1 3 0 LGConfig L LR TR L T �? Volume L 177 1160 74 2559 96 135 1915 Lane Width F 112.0 .12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 ( 0 1' �. Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations N Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru A h Right Right A Peds Peds d WB Left A SB Left A A �! Thru Thru A A Right A Right Peds Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 15.0 115.0 5.0 ;Yellow 4.0 4.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 1.0 1.0 ! Cycle Length: 150.0 secs 1 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate 1 Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS !'Eastbound R Westbound L 177 1770 1.15 0.10 180.2 F LR 158 1583 0.59 0.10 70.6 E 145.5 F Northbound 1• TR 3869 5047 0.91 0.77 17.6 B 17.6 B P Southbound ',L 168 1770 0.23 0.83 49.6 D T 4228 R 5074 0.51 0.83 3.7 A 4.5 A 1 Intersection Delay = 19.2 (sec /veh) Intersection LOS = B d 1 -Way Stop Control Page 1 of i TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Feral Information Site Information st DPA nc /Co. section Orientation: East -West Performed I sis Time Period Existing AM Peak Hour Bct Description 5966 South Dixie Highway - #06253 Intersection SW 73 St /SW 59 Ct Jurisdiction South Miami, FI Analysis Year /West Street: SW 73 Street North /South Street: SW 59 Court section Orientation: East -West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 dcle Volumes and Adjustments )r Street,, Eastbound Westbound ement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R me veh /h 11 107 20 7 209 15 -,-Hour Factor, PHF 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.79 0.79 0.79 rly;Flow Rate, HFR /h 15 146 27 8 264 18 :ent °Heavy Vehicles 2 — 2 — ian Type ; Undivided ',hannelized 0 0 s 0 1 0 0 2 0 figuration LTR LT TR _tream Signal 0 0 or Street' Northbound Southbound ement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R ime veh/h) 15 1 7 3 0- 6 k -Hour Factor, PHF' 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.56 0.56 0.56 rly Flow Rate, HFR Jh) 20 1 9 5 0 10 :ent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 ;ent Grade (%o) 0 0 ad Approach N N torage 0 0 ;hannelized 0 0 as 0 1" 0 0 1 0 figuration LTR LTR , Queue Length, and Level of Service roach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ,ernent 1 4 7 8 g 10 11 12 e' Configuration, LTR LT LTR < LTR ah /h) 15 8 30 15 n) (veh /h) 1277 1401 634 671 0.01 0.01 0.05. 0.02 queue length 0.04 0.02 0.15 0.07 itrol Delay (s /veh) 7.9 7.6 11.0 10.5 > A A B B' ,roach Delay (s /veh) - - 11.0 10.5 ,roach LOS -- B B -fight © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +TM Version 5.2 Generated: 11/21/2006 11:11 AN / /C:\ Documents %20and %20Settings \SoniaS\ Local %20Settings \Temp \u2k59AC.tmp 11/21/2006 • HCS +: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 Analyst: DPA Inter.: SW 73 St / US -1 Agency: Area Type: All other areas Date: Jurisd: South Miami, Fl period:-Existing PM -Peak Hour. Year -- Project ID: 5966 South Dixie Highway - #06253 E/W St: SW 73 Street N/S St: US -1 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound I Northbound Southbound L T R L T R I L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 1 3 0 LGConfig L LR TR I L T Volume 1241 110 1 2152 127 128 3247 Lane Width 1 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations ' Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru A Right Right A Peds Peds WE Left A I SB Left A A �. Thru Thru A A '. Right A Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right I SB Right WE Right Green 18.0 102.0 5.0 I; Yellow 4.0 4.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 140.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary I Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate 1 Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound I., I !„ Westbound L 228 1770 1.36 0.13 246.8 F LR 204 1583 0.69 0.13 67.9 E 190.7 F ' Northbound TR 3666 5032 0.70 0.73 11.1 B 11.1 B Southbound L 179 1770 0.18 0.80 21.7 C T 4059 5074 0.92 0.80 14.6 B 14.6 B b„ Intersection Delay = 25.0 (sec /veh) Intersection LOS = C b, 1 li -Way Stop Control TWO -WAY STOP G feral Information st DPA nc /Co. -section Orientation: East -West Performed Iysis Time Period Existing PM Peak Hour :ct Description 5906 South Dixie Highway - #06253 TROL SUIU MARY .e Information ersection SW 7 risdiction Soutl al sis Year Page 1 of `1 5t /SW 59 Ct liami, Fl /West Street: 'SW 73 Street " North /South Street: SW 59 Court - -section Orientation: East -West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 iicle Volumes and Adjustments )r Street Eastbound Westbound ement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R me veh/h) 1 119 17 7 371 2 (-Hour Factor, PHF 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.94 0.94 0.94 rly Flow Rate, HFR th 1 154 22 7 394 2 :ent Heavy Vehicles 2 — 2 -- — ian Type Undivided �hannelized 0 0 s 0 7 0 0 2 D figuration LTR LT TR ;ream Signal 0 0 )r Street Northbound Southbound ement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L fi R L T R me veh/h) 20 0 13 2 0 1 c -Hour Factor, PHF 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 - 0.75 0.75 tly Flow Rate, 'HFR 1h 26 0' 17 2 0 1 :ent Heavy Vehicles 2: 2 2 2 2 2 ;ent Grade ( %) 0 0 " %d Approach N N :orage 0 0 'ahannelized 0 0 s 0 1 0 0 1 0 figuration. LTR LTR y, `Queue Length, and Level of Service roach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Configuration LTR LT 1TR LTR :h /h) 1 7 43 3 i) (veh /h) " 1159 1398 640 466 0.00 0.01 0.07 0.01 queue length 0.00 0.02 0.22 0.02 trol Delay "(s /veh) 8.1 7.6 11.0 12.8 A A B I B roach Delay (s /veh) — -- 11.0 12.8 'roach LOS — — 8 - B ight © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +rM Version 5.2 Generated: 11 121/2006 11:12 AN I /C:\ Documents %20and %20Settings \SoniaS \Local %20Settings \Temp \u2k59AF.tmp 11/21/2006 v Future without Project Conditions l HCS +: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 analyst: DPA Inter.: 'SW 73 St / US` -1 agency: Area Type: All other areas )ate: Jurisd: South Miami, F1 ?er-iod: Fut`wo Proj AM Peak Hour Year )roject ID: 5966 South Dixie Highway - #06253 's /W St:' SW 73 Street: N/S St: US -1` SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T, R L T R L T R L T R To. Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0' 1 3 0 ,GConf i'g L LR TR L T 'olume [163 75 2610 98 136 1953 ,ane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 :TOR Vol I 0 I 112.0 0 1 ruration 0.25 Type: All other areas Area _ Signal Operations hase Combination 1 2; 3 4 5 6 7 8` ;B Left NB Left Thru Thru A` Right �, Right A Peds Peds 'B Left 'A SB Left A A Thru I Thru A` A Right A Right Peds (; " Peds' B Right I', EB Right B Right .,WB Right reen 15.0 115.0 5.0 ellow 4.0 4.0 3.0 11 Red' 2.0 10 1.0 Cycle 'Length: 150.0; secs Intersection Performance Summary, ppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach> ane Group Flow Rate rp: Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay, LOS astbound estbound 177 1770 1.16 0.10 186.1 F; R 158' 1583 0.60 0.1`0 70.9' E F orthbound R 3869 5047 0.93 0.77 19.4 B 19.4 B ou;thbound 168 1770 0.24 0.83 53.8' D 4228 5074 0.52 0.83 3.8 A 4.7 A Intersection Delay = 20.4 (sec /veh) Intersection LOS =.0 'W -Way Stop Control TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Page 1 of 1 3eneral Information Site Information anal st DPA Intersection SW 73 St /SW 59 Ct k enc ICo. _ 0ate Performed anal sis Time Period :ast/West Street: SW 73 Street Jurisdiction South Miami, Fl North /South Street: Analysis Year Fut wo Pro' AM Peak Hour itersection Orientation: East -West ro'ect Description ` 5966 South Dixie Highway - #06253 :ast/West Street: SW 73 Street North /South Street: SW 59 Court itersection Orientation: East -West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 /ehicle Volumes and Adjustments ila'or Street Eastbound Westbound lovement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 'olume veh/h) 11 109 20 7 213 15 'eak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.79 0.79 0.79 sourly Flow Rate, HFR veh /h 15 1,49 27 8 269 18 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- 2 1 -- — ledian Type Undivided tT Channelized 0 0 ,anes 0 1 0 0 2 0 ;onfiguration LTR LT TR stream Signal 0 0 Ainor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 'olume veh/h) 15 1 7 3 0 6 'eak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.56 0.56 0.56 burly Flow Rate, HFR reh /h 20 1 9 5 0 10 'ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 'ercent Grade ( %) 0 0 dared Approach N N Storage 0 0 IT Channelized 0 0 .anes 0 7 0 0 1 0 :onfiguration I I LTR LTR )e1lay, Queue Length, and Level of Service ,pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 .ane Configuration LTR LT LTR LTR (veh /h) 15 8 30 15 (m) (veh /h) 1272 1398 630 665 'lc 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.02 t5% queue length 0.04 0.02! 0.15 0.07 ;ontrol Delay (s /veh) 7.9 7.6 11.0 10.5 .OS A A B B kpproach Delay (s /veh) — — 11.0 10.5 kpproach LOS -- -- B B opyright© 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +TM Version 5.2 Generated: 11121/2006 11:13 AN ile: / /C:\ Documents %20and %20Settings \SoniaS \]Local %2'OSettings \Temp \u2k59B2.tmp 11/21/200( HCS +: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 analyst: DPA Inter.: SW 73 St / US -1 agency: Area Type: All other areas )ate: Jurisd: South Miami, F1 ?eriod: Fut wo Proj PM Peak Hour Year ?roject ID: 5966' South Dixie Highway - #06253 ;./W St: SW 73 Street N /S+ St: US -1 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY' 1 Eastbound 1 Westbound 1 Northbound 1 Southbound 1 1 L T R 1 L T R ) L T R 1 L T R 1 lo. Lanes -1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 i 1 0 3 0 1 1 3 0 1 ,GConfig 1 1 L LR 1 TR I L T Tolume 1 1246 112 1 2195 130 129 3312° 1 pane Width 1 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 112.0 12.0' 1 tTOR Vol 1 I 0 1 0 )uration 0.25 Type: All other 'areas Area Signal Operations )hase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 ;B Left 1 NB Left Thru 1 Thru A Right ) Right A Peds ( Peds 7B Left A 1 SB Left A A Thru 1 Thru A A Right A 1 Right Peds 1 Peds 1B Right 1 EB Right ;B ' Right 1 WB ;' Right Treen 18.0 102.0 5.0 'ellow 4.0' 4.0 3.0 .11 Red 2,.0 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: -140.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary .ppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach ,ane Group Flow Rate ;rp Capacity' (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS : astbound iestbound j 228 1770 1.38 0.13 257.7 F` ,R 204 1583 0.71 0.13 69.1 E 198.5 F lorthbound 'R` 3666 5032 0.71 0.73 11.4 B' 11.4; B ;outhbound 1 179 1770 0.18 0.80 22.9 C ' 4059 5074 0.94 0.80 16.3 B' 16.4 B Intersection Delay = ?26.6` (sec /veh) Intersection LOS C r6 -Way Stop Control eneral Information TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Site Information gal st DPA enc 7Co. South Miami, Fl ate Performed -ialvsis Time Periap Fut wo Proj PM Peak Hour Page 1 of 1 Intersection SW 73 St /SW 59 Ct Jurisdiction South Miami, Fl Analysis Year oject Description ' 5966 South Dixie Highway - #06253 Ist/West Street: SW 73 Street North /South Street: SW 59 Court :ersection Orientation: East -West chicle Volumes and Adjustments IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 a'or Street Eastbound Westbound :)vement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Aume veh /h 1 • 121 17 7 378 2 ;ak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.94 0.94 0.94 )urly Flow Rate, HFR ah /h 1 157 22 7 402 2 ;rcent Heavy Vehicles 2 - — 2 -- -- edian Type Undivided . r Channelized 0 0 Ines 0 1 0 0 2 0 .)nfiguration LTR LT TR stream Signal 0 0 inor Street Northbound Southbound ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R plume veh/h) 20 0 13 2 0 1 Bak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 curly Flow Rate, HFR eh /h) 26 i) 17 2 0 1 arcent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 arcent Grade ( %) 0 0 ared Approach N N Storage 0 0 T Channelized 0 0 anes 0 '1 0 0 1 0 onfiguration LTR LTR elay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound lovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ane Configuration LTR LT LTR LTR (veh /h) 1 7 43 3 (m) (veh /h) 1151 1394 634 459 is 0.00 0.01 0.07 0.01 5% queue length 0.00 0.02 0.22 0.02 :ontrol Delay (s /veh) 8.1 7.6 11.1 12.9 OS A A B B ,pproach Delay (s /veh) — — 11.1 12.9 ,pproach LOS — — B B >pyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +TM Version 5.2 Generated: 11/21/2006 11:13 AN le://C:\ Documents %20and %20Settings \SoniaS \:Local %20Settings \Temp \u2k59B5.tmp 11/21/2006 r HCS +: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 Analyst: DPA Inter.: SW 73 St / US -1 Agency: Area Type: All other areas Date: Jurisd: South Miami, F1 Period: Fut w Proj AlM Peak Hour Year - _- Project ID 5966 South Dixie Highway - #06253 E/W St: SW73 Street N/S St: US -1 a. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R I L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 1 3 LGConf ig I L LR TR L T !'•' Volume 1164 76 2610 121 147 1953 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 ! RTOR Vol 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations � Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left i NB Left ! Thru Thru A Ill Right Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SE Left A A Thru Thru A A Right A I Peds Peds .NB Right I EB Right SB Right WB Right d. Green 15.0 115.0 5.0 „'Yellow 4.0 4.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 1.0 1.0 Or Cycle Length: 150.0 0„ Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach r Lane Group Flow Rate - Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound o -1i' Westbound L 177 1770 1.18 0.10 190.2 F LR 158 1583 0.61 0.10 71.3 E 152.6 F Northbound J° TR 3864 5040 0.94 0.77 20.4 C 20.4 C 4" Southbound .L 168 1770 0.32 0.83 57.9 E T 4228 5074 0.52 0.83 3.8 A 5.1 A Intersection Delay = 21.3 (sec /veh) Intersection LOS = C secs -Way. Stop Control Page 1 of `a TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY a feral Information Site Information ll st DPA e Intersection SW 73 St / SW 59 Ct _ / o, :nc C Jurisdiction South Miami, FI eperformed ` . Analysis Year il sis Time Period Fut w Pro' AM Peak Hour act Description 5966 South Dixie Hi hwa - #06253 f West Street: SW 73 Street North /South Street: SW 59 Court -section Orientation: East -West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 iiCle Volumes and Ad ustments w Street Eastbound Westbound ement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Ime veh/h) 11 109 55 19 213 15 k -Hour Factor, PHF 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.79 0.79 0.79 rly,Flow Rate, HFR 15 149 75 24 269 18 Jh :ent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- 2 Jan Type Undivided ,hannelized 0 0' as 0 1" 0 0, 2 0 figuration' LTR LT TR tream Signal 0, 0 Dr'Street ` Northbound Southbound ement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L„ T R L T R Ime veh/h) 8 3 0 6' k -Hour Factor, PHF 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.56 0.56 0.56 rly;Flow Rate, HFR 22 1 11 5 0 10 Jh :ent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2° 2 2 :ent Grade ( %) 0 0 ad Approach N' N torage 0 0 >annelized 0 0' es ., 0 1 0 0" 1 0` figuration LTR LTR iy, Queue Length and Level of Service roach Eastbound " Westbound Northbound Southbound ,ement 1 4 7: 8 9 10 11 12 e Configuration LTR LT LTR : LTR Dh /h) 15 24 ' 34 15 1) (veh /h) 1272 1342 584 630 0.;01 0.02 0.06 0.02 queue length 0.04 0.05 0.18' 0.07 trol Delay (s /veh) 7.9 7.7 11.5 10.9' 3 A A B B roach Delay (s /veh) -- -- 11.5 10.9 roach LOS — -- B B ight 0 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +TM Version 5.2 Generated: 111,2112006 11:14 AN //C :\ Documents %20and %20Settings \SoniaS \Local %20Settings \Temp \u2k59B 8.tmp 1,1/2'1/2006 HCS +: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 Analyst: DPA Inter.: SW 73 St / US -1 Agency: Area Type: All other areas Date: Jurisd: South Miami, Fl Period: Fut wo_Proj__PM-Peak Hour Year. -'Project ID: 5966 South Dixie Highway - #06253 E/W St: SW 73 Street N/S St: US -1 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R I L T R I L T R No. Lanes 0 0 0 ( 1 0 0 0 3 0 1 3 0 LGConfig L LR TR L T "Volume 1251 118 1 2195 138 133 3312 ,.Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru A Right Right A Peds Peds WE Left A SB Left A A Thru I Thru A A Right A Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right I SB Right WE Right ' Green 18.0 102.0 5.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 140.0 secs �- Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate i Grp Capacity (s) V/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Il Eastbound t. I Westbound L 228 1770 1.41 0.13 270.5 F LR 204 1583 I 0.74 0.13 72.2 E 207.2 F . Northbound 1,TR 3664 5029 0.72 0.73 11.5 B 11.5 B I'Southbound I,L 179 1770 0.21 0.80 24.6 C T 4059 5074 0.94 0.80 16.3 B 16.4 B !. Intersection Delay 1' = 27.5 (sec /veh) Intersection LOS = C � 1 -Way Stop Control Page 1 of ight © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +TM Version 5.2 Generated: 11/21/2006 11:29 AN / /C:\ Documents %20and %20Sett ngs \SoniaS\Local %20Settings \Temp \u2k59CC.tmp 11/21/2006 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY feral Information Site Information st DPA nc /Co. Performed sis Time Period' :ct Description - 5966 South Dixie Highway - #06253 Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year SW 73 St / SW 59 Ct South Miami, F1 /West Street: SW 73 Street ` North /South Street: SW 59 Court -section Orientation: East -West IStudy Period hrs : '0.25 iicle Volumes and Adjustments )r Street Eastbound Westbound ement 1 -2 3 4 5 6' L T R L T R. me veh/h) 1 121 30 11 378 2 c -Hour Factor, PHF 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.94 0.94 0.94 rly Flow Rate, HFR /h 1 157 38 11 402 2 :ent Heavy Vehicles 2 — — 2 — — ian Type : Undivided ',hannelized 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 figuration LTR LT TR trearn Signal 0 0 :)r Street'` Northbound Southbound ement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L' T R ime veh/h) 31 0 19 2- 0 1 k -Hour Factor,,PHF 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 rly Flow Rate, HFR /h 41 0 25 2 0 1 :ent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 :ent Grade ( %) 0 0 A Approach N N forage 0 0 ,hannelized 0 0 as 0 1 0 0 1 0 figuration LTR LTR iy, Queue Length, and Level of Service roach Eastbound ' Westbound Northbound Southbound 'ement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 ` 12 e Configuration LTR LT. LTR LTR :h /h) 1. 11 66 3 ,i) (veh /h)' 1151 1375 696 442 0.00 0.01 0.11 0.01 )queue length 0.00 0.02 0.36 0.02 trol Delay (s /veh) 8.1 7.6 11.5 13.2 i ` A A B B' roach Delay (s /veh) _ — 11.5 13.2 roach LOS - _- B B ight © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +TM Version 5.2 Generated: 11/21/2006 11:29 AN / /C:\ Documents %20and %20Sett ngs \SoniaS\Local %20Settings \Temp \u2k59CC.tmp 11/21/2006