07-21-09 Item 9South Miami
*AmericaCKY
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 1 I r
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM 2001
To: The Honorable Mayor Feliu and Members of the City Commission
Via: Ajibola Balogun, City Manager
From: Thomas J. Vageline, Director
Planning and Zoning Departmen
Date: July 21, 2009 ITEM No.
Subject:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 20- 6.2(A) ENTITLED "APPEALS: ERPB
DECISIONS; TIME; STANDING TO APPEAL" IN ORDER TO MODIFY THE
PROVISION REGULATING THE TIME PERIOD AS TO WHEN AN APPEAL
OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND PRESERVATION BOARD (ERPB)
DECISION CAN BE FILED: AND CLARIFYING WHO CAN FILE AN APPEAL
OF A DECISION OF THE ERPB; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY,
ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
SUMMARY
During its current review of the entire Land Development Code the Planning and Zoning
Department staff has determined that certain provisions need immediate consideration
due to legal problems, technical wording errors, or to respond to specific issues which the
Department is facing and can not resolve.
The Land Development Code provides regulations governing an appeal of a decision of
the Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB). LDC Section 20- 6.2(A)
allows an applicant, the City administration and any interested person to appeal a
decision of the ERPB to the City Commission which may reverse, affirm, or modify the
appealed decision. An appeal to an ERPB decision can be made at any time after the
ERPB decision is made but before a building permit is issued.
CURRENT LDC REGULATIONS
The Planning and Zoning Department and the City Attorney have expressed concerns on
several occasions that there is no limitation on when an appeal of an ERPB decision can
be filed. An appeal stays the proceedings of a project and would also stop the review of
any building permit which has been applied for until the City Commission can hold a
hearing and make a decision on the appeal. This would apply to any construction project
whether it is simple home renovation, window replacement, painting, signs, additions or
2
new construction. A property owner has no assurance that their project will be allowed by
the City until a permit is issued. This could result in a severe economic hardship on a
homeowner or commercial property owner if there is a successful appeal after
considerable funds have been invested in plan preparation. A property owner should be
able to rely on the official approval of the ERPB within a reasonable number of days.
A secondary concern is that the current regulations allow for an appeal to be fled by
"interested citizens ". There is no definition of who interested citizens are, where they are
located or whether or not they have standing to file such an appeal. This generic wording
could result in legal problems and is not fair to property owners to allow an appeal to be
made by "any" person regardless of their relationship to the City of South Miami. It
would be appropriate to define "interested citizens" and to limit the filing of an appeal to
residents or property owners in the City.
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS (See proposed ordinance)
It is proposed in the attached draft ordinance that an appeal of an ERPB decision or
recommendation be filed within thirty (30) days of the ERPB final decision or before a
building permit is issued, whichever comes first. This limitation will protect a
homeowner or property owner from appeals which are made several months after the
ERPB decision is made, which appeal can put on -going planning efforts and permitting
in j eopardy.
In order to clarify who can appeal a decision it is proposed that the category "interested
citizens" be defined as any South Miami resident or property owner and any citizen living
in an abutting municipality and within 500 feet of the property under review.
PLANNING BOARD ACTION
The Planning Board at its May 26, 2009 meeting conducted a public hearing on the
proposed amendments and adopted a motion by a vote of 6 ayes 0 nays recommending
approval.
RECOMMENDATION
(1) The City Commission at its June 16, 2009 meeting discussed the subject
ordinance and then made an amendment to add the word "business owners" to the
list of persons who could appeal an ERPB decision. This is included in the
attached second reading ordinance.
(2) At the same meeting the Commission also expressed a concern that there may not
be enough time for an appellant to file an appeal if the minutes of the Board are
not available for study and review. This would be especially important if the
approved development is the construction of a new commercial or residential
building. It would be appropriate if there was a waiting time period before a
permit could be applied for. The City Commission may wish to add the following
wording (in bold, underlined, italics) to the amendment paragraph:
3
Section 20 -6.2 Appeals.
(A) ERPB Decisions; Time; Standing to Appeal. All decisions and
recommendations of the environmental review and preservation board (ERPB) shall be
posted on the City Hall bulletin board immediately following the ERPB meeting. An
applicant may old apply for a building permit after noon of the day after the ERPB
meeting, or in the case of new building construction at least rifteen (1 S) calendar days
after the ERPB meeting at which the application was given final appre*ed approval, if
all other requirements for the permit have been met. An appeal of an ERPB final decision
or recommendation may be filed within thirty (30) calendar days of the ERPB final
decision or before a building permit is issued, whichever comes first,
by filing same with the city clerk upon a form
prescribed therefore. Appeals may be filed by the applicant, ' a
property owner, business owner, or resident of the City, Of the city administration, or
any interested citizens living in an abutting municipality and within 500 feet of the
Property under review.
It is recommended that the attached ordinance, as amended on first reading and with the
additional wording set forth above, be adopted on second reading.
Attachments:
Draft ordinance
Planning Board Meeting Excerpt 5 -26 -09
Planning Dept. Staff report 5 -26 -09
Public Notices
TJV /SAY
X: \Comm Items\2009 \7- 21- 09\LDC Amend ERPB Appeals Revised CM Report.doc
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 20- 6.2(A) ENTITLED "APPEALS: ERPB
DECISIONS; TIME; STANDING TO APPEAL" IN ORDER TO MODIFY THE
PROVISION REGULATING THE TIME PERIOD AS TO WHEN AN APPEAL
OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND PRESERVATION BOARD (ERPB)
DECISION CAN BE FILED; AND CLARIFYING WHO CAN FILE AN APPEAL
OF A DECISION OF THE ERPB; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY,
ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Land Development Code (LDC) Section 20- 6.2(A) governing an
appeal of a decision of the Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB)
provides that an applicant, the City administration and any interested persons may appeal
a decision of the ERPB to the City Commission which may reverse, affirm, or modify the
appealed decision; and
WHEREAS, an appeal to an ERPB decision can be made at any time after the ERPB
decision is made but before a building permit is issued; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Department and the City Attorney have
expressed concerns on several occasions that there is no limitation on when an appeal of an
ERPB decision can be filed, which appeal stays the proceedings of a project and also stops
the review of any building permit which has been applied for until the City Commission
can hold a hearing and make a decision on the appeal; and
WHEREAS, allowing any "interested citizens" to appeal a decision of the ERPB is
not fair to property owners in that "any" person regardless of standing or their relationship
to the City of South Miami may appeal a decision several months after the ERPB decision
is made, which appeal can put on -going planning efforts and permitting in jeopardy; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Department has prepared an amendment to
Section 20- 6.2(A) of the Land Development Code which will provide that an appeal of an
ERPB decision or recommendation be filed within thirty (30) days of the ERPB final
decision or before a building permit is issued, whichever comes first; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Department has also prepared a technical
amendment to the same section of the Land Development Code to clarify that "interested
citizens" who can appeal a decision by the ERPB are limited to a South Miami resident or
property owner and any citizen living in an abutting municipality and within 500 feet of
the property under review; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Board at its May 26, 2009 meeting, after public hearing,
adopted a motion by a vote of 6 ayes 0 nays recommending that the proposed amendments
to the Land Development Code be approved; and
2
1 WHEREAS, the City Commission desires to accept the recommendation of the
2 Planning Board and enact the aforesaid amendment.
4 NOW, THEREFORE, BE. IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY
5 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA:
7 Section 1. That Section 20- 6.2(A) entitled "Appeals" of the Land Development Code is
8 hereby amended as follows:
9
10 Article VI Administration and Enforcement
11 * * * ** *
12 Section 20 -6.2 Appeals.
13
14 (A) ERPB Decisions; Time; Standing to Appeal. All decisions and
15 recommendations of the environmental review and preservation board (ERPB) shall be
16 posted on the City Hall bulletin board immediately following the ERPB meeting. An
17 applicant may apply for a building permit after noon of the day after the ERPB
18 meeting, at which the application was given final approval, if all other
19 requirements for the permit have been met. An appeal of an ERPB final decision or
20 recommendation may be filed within thirty (30) days of the ERPB final decision or
21 before a building permit is issued, whichever comes first,
22 by filing same with the city clerk upon a form prescribed therefore.
23 Appeals may be tokm filed by the applicant, a property owner,
24 business owner, or resident of the City, of the city administration, or any interested
25 citizens living in an abutting municipality and within 500 feet of the nronerty under
26 review.
27
28
29 (B) Stay of Proceedings. An appeal stays all proceedings in furtherance of the
30 action appealed from, unless the officer from whom the appeal is taken certifies to the city
31 commission, after notice of appeal has been filed with him, that because of the facts stated
32 in the certificate a stay would, in the officer's opinion, cause imminent peril to life or
33 property or that because the violation charged is transitory in nature a stay would seriously
34 interfere with enforcement of the Code.
36 (C) Restraining Orders. If certification occurs in accordance with subsection
37 (B) above, proceedings may not be stayed except by a restraining order, which may be
38 granted by the city commission or by a court of record on application, on notice to the
39 officer from whom the appeal is taken and on due cause shown.
40
41 (D) Appeal Hearing. The city commission shall hear and enter a decision on all
42 appeals within sixty (60) days of the date of filing said appeal, and shall provide due notice
43 of the appeal to the parties.
44
45 (E) Commission Action. The city commission may reverse, affirm or modify
46 any order, requirement, decision or determination appealed from and shall make any order,
47 requirement, decision or determination that, in the city commission's opinion, ought to be
48 made in the circumstances.
49
50
51
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
3
(F) Modification Allowed. When practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships
would result from carrying out the strict letter of a Code provision, the city commission
may, in passing upon appeals, vary or modify any regulation or provision of the Code
relating to the use, construction or alteration of buildings or structures or the use of land, so
that the spirit of the Code is observed, public safety and welfare secured, and substantial
justice done.
(G) Prior Denials. The city commission shall not be required to hear an appeal
or application previously denied if it finds that there has been no substantial change in
conditions or circumstances bearing on the appeal or application.
Section 2 All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance are hereby repealed.
Section 3 If any section, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason
held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, this holding shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance.
Section 4 This ordinance shall be effective immediately after the adoption hereof.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
1St Reading —
2nd Reading —
READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY
day of , 2009
APPROVED:
MAYOR
COMMISSION VOTE:
Mayor Feliu:
Vice Mayor Beasley:
Commissioner Palmer:
Commissioner Newman:
Commissioner Sellars:
(New wording in bold and underlined; wording removed in )
X: \Comm Items \2009 \7- 21- 09\LDC Amend ERPB Appeals Revised Ord.doc
U ^'
INCORPORATED
1927
0RCo
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
PLANNING BOARD
Regular Meeting
Action Summary Minutes
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
City Commission Chambers
7:30 P.M.
EXCERPT
I. Call to Order and the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag
Action: The meeting was called to order at 7:35 P.M.
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.
II. Roll Call
Action: Chairman Morton requested a roll call.
Board members present constituting a quorum: Mr. Morton, Mr. Cruz, Ms. Yates, Mr.
Whitman, Mr. Comendeiro and Mr. Farfan. Absent: Ms. Young.
City staff present: Mr. Thomas J. Vageline (Planning and Zoning Director), Sanford A.
Youkilis (Planning Consultant), Lourdes Cabrera - Hernandez (Principal Planner), Alerik
Barrios (Assistant). Absent: Ms. Maria Stout- Tate (Administrative Assistant).
III. Planning Board Applications/Public Hearings
PB -09 -011
Applicant: City of South Miami
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
SECTION 20- 6.2(A) ENTITLED "APPEALS: ERPB DECISIONS; TIME; STANDING
TO APPEAL" IN ORDER TO MODIFY THE PROVISION REGULATING THE
TIME PERIOD AS TO WHEN AN APPEAL OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
AND PRESERVATION BOARD (ERPB) DECISION CAN BE FILED; AND
CLARIFYING WHO CAN FILE AN APPEAL OF A DECISION OF THE ERPB;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Action: Mr. Farfan read the item into the record.
Mr. Youkilis advised the Board that while reviewing the entire Land Development Code the
Planning and Zoning Department staff has determined that certain provisions need immediate
consideration due to legal problems, technical wording errors, or to respond to specific issues
which the Department is facing and can not resolve. The Land Development Code provides
regulations governing an appeal of a decision of the Environmental Review and Preservation
Planning Board Meeting
May 26, 2009
Page 2 of 3
Board (ERPB). LDC Section 20- 6.2(A) allows an applicant, the City administration and any
person to appeal -a decision of the ERPB to the City Commission which may reverse, affirm,
or modify the appealed decision. An appeal to an ERPB decision can be made at any time
after the ERPB decision is made but before a building permit is issued. He commented that
the Planning and Zoning Department and the City Attorney have expressed concerns on
several occasions that there is no limitation on when an appeal of an ERPB decision can be
filed. An appeal stays the proceedings of a project and would also stop the review of any
building permit which has been applied for until the City Commission can hold a hearing and
make a decision on the appeal. This would apply to any construction project whether its
simple home renovation, window replacement, painting, signs, additions or new construction.
A property owner has no assurance that their project will be allowed by the City until a permit
is issued. This could result in a severe economic hardship on a homeowner or commercial
property owner if there is a successful appeal after considerable funds have been invested in
plan preparation. A property owner should be able to rely on the official approval of the
ERPB within a reasonable number of days. Mr. Youkilis informed the Board that another
concern is that the current regulations allow for an appeal to be filed by "interested citizens ".
There is no definition of who interested citizens are, where they are located or whether or not
they have standing to file such an appeal. This generic wording could result in legal problems
and is not fair to property owners to allow an appeal to be made by "any" person regardless of
their relationship.to the City of South Miami. It would be appropriate to limit the filing of an
appeal to residents or property owners in the City. Mr. Youkilis recommended approval of
the proposed amendments to Section 20 -6.2 (A).
Mr. Morton questioned if the ERPB is making a recommendation to the City Commission or
is the Board in the permit process to approve and disapprove and then it goes on with no
action on part of the City Commission. Mr. Youkilis responded that the ERPB makes a
decision generally a final decision unless there is an appeal. Mr. Morton commented that
basically the ERPB would make a recommendation on the application.
Mr. Whitman questioned how long it takes for the meeting minutes to be posted. Mr. Youkilis
commented that meeting minutes are done within seven to ten work days. Mr. Whitman
questioned if there had ever been a case that the meeting minutes were not available within
thirty days. Mr. Youkilis responded that there has never been a delay and the Board members
expect to see the meeting minutes at the next meeting.
Mr. Morton questioned if there is a time limit for public availability for the meeting minutes.
Mr. Youkilis replied that there is no regulation on the date the meeting minutes are due.
Mr. Whitman commented that the process of appeals needs to be fair to any applicant. Mr.
Youkilis commented that an appeal could be filed 30 days after an ERPB decision or before a
building permit is issued.
Ms. Yates commented that she was concerned that if someone has a complaint and the
applicant is going to submit for a permit there is no thirty day wait. She recommended
changing the word "or" to "which ever one comes last ".
Planning Board Meeting
May 26, 2009
Page 3 of 3
Mr. Youkilis commented that most of the applications to ERPB include minor renovation and
some new construction.
Mr. Comendeiro commented that the party that is attached to the issue would be at the
meeting or be at the meeting. He commented that the concern is not with the minutes, but the
person who is willing to appeal does not sit around to see if the minutes are published.
Mr. Morton questioned if the Planning Board could give the ERPB a suggestion of placing a
timeline on the meeting minutes.
Mr. Cruz was concerned that certain areas of the city are divided into unincorporated Miami -
Dade and South Miami. He recommended that a certain distance be applied to both sides. Mr.
Youkilis commented there are certain issues that are of interest to the property owners that
may want to appeal a decision even if they are a mile away.
Mr. Whitman commented that the way it is written "any interested citizen" is perfect the way
it stands, but the new form it is written in, is not legal under legal protection grounds.
Mr. Comendeiro suggested the wording be changed to "interested citizen within five hundred
feet (500ft), a property owner or a resident of the city ".
Chairman opened the public hearing.
No one came forward.
Chairman closed the public hearing.
Motion: Mr. Comendairo moved and Ms. Yates seconded the amendment with the following
changes stated below:
ERPB Decisions; Time; Standing to Appeal. All decisions and recommendations of the
environmental review and preservation board (ERPB) shall be posted on the City Hall bulletin
board immediately following the ERPB meeting. An applicant may apply for a
building permit after noon of the day after the ERPB meeting, at which the application was
given final approval, if all other requirements for the permit have been met. An
appeal of an ERPB final decision or recommendation may be filed within thirty (30) days of
the ERPB final decision or before a building permit is issued, whichever comes first, at
0 is by filing same with the city clerk upon a form
prescribed therefore. Appeals may be 1 filed by the applicant, a
property owner or resident of the City, e�r- the city administration, or any interested
citizens living in an abutting municipality and within 500 feet of the property under
review.
Vote: 6 Ayes 0 Nay
X: \Comm Items\2009 \7- 21- 09\Minutes excerpt 09 -01 Ldoc
oS so U T South Miami
r
All- America City
1 1
INCORPORATED
1927
4- 10 �
2001
To: . Honorable Chair and Date: May 26, 2009
Planning Board Members
From: Thomas J. Vageline, Director Re: LDC Amendment —ERPB Appeal
Planning and Zoning Departme t Time Sec. 20- 6.2(A)
PB -09 -011
Applicant: City of South Miami
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
SECTION 20- 6.2(A) ENTITLED "APPEALS: ERPB DECISIONS; TIME; STANDING
TO APPEAL" IN ORDER TO MODIFY THE PROVISION REGULATING THE TIME
PERIOD AS TO WHEN AN APPEAL OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND
PRESERVATION BOARD (ERPB) DECISION CAN BE FILED: AND CLARIFYING
WHO CAN FILE AN APPEAL OF A DECISION OF THE ERPB; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY, ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
BACKGROUND
During its current review of the entire Land Development Code the Planning and Zoning
Department staff has determined that certain provisions need immediate consideration due to
legal problems, technical wording errors, or to respond to specific issues which the Department
is facing and can not resolve.
The Land Development Code provides regulations governing an appeal of a decision of the
Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB). LDC Section 20- 6.2(A) allows an
applicant, the City administration and any person to appeal a decision of the ERPB to the City
Commission which may reverse, affirm, or modify the appealed decision. An appeal to an
ERPB decision can be made at any time after the ERPB decision is made but before a building
permit is issued.
CURRENT LDC REGULATIONS
The Planning and Zoning Department and the City Attorney have expressed concerns on several
occasions that there is no limitation on when an appeal of an ERPB decision can be filed. An
appeal stays the proceedings of a project and would also stop the review of any building permit
which has been applied for until the City Commission can hold a hearing and make a decision
on the appeal. This would apply to any construction project whether its simple home
renovation, window replacement, painting, signs, additions or new construction. A property
owner has no assurance that their project will be allowed by the City until a permit is issued.
This could result in a severe economic hardship on a homeowner or commercial property owner
if there is a successful appeal after considerable funds have been invested in plan preparation. A
LDC Amendment
May 26, 2009
Page 2 of 3
property owner should be able to rely on the official approval of the ERPB within a reasonable
number of days. (See proposed amendment below)
A secondary concern is that the current regulations allow for an appeal to be filed by
"interested citizens ". There is no definition of who interested citizens are, where they are
located or whether or not they have standing to file such an appeal. This generic wording could
result in legal problems and is not fair to property owners to allow an appeal to be made by
"any" person regardless of their relationship to the City of South Miami. It would be
appropriate to limit the filing of an appeal to residents or property owners in the City. (See
proposed amendment below)
PROPOSED AMENDMENT
(new wording shown in bold/underlined; wording to be removed shown in strike
Section 20 -6.2 Appeals.
(A) ERPB Decisions; Time; Standing to Appeal. All decisions and recommendations
of the environmental review and preservation board (ERPB) shall be posted on the City Hall
bulletin board immediately following the ERPB meeting. An applicant may apply for a
building permit after noon of the day after the ERPB meeting, at which the application was
given final appF@*@d approval, if all other requirements for the permit have been met. An
appeal of an ERPB final decision or recommendation may be filed within thirty (30) days of
the ERPB final decision or before a building permit is issued, whichever comes first, at=�
b by filing same with the city clerk upon a form prescribed
jr
therefore. Appeals may be filed by the applicant, into-wes Wea :t r a property owner or
resident of the City, or the city administration.
(B) Stay of Proceedings. An appeal stays all proceedings in furtherance of the action
appealed from, unless the officer from whom the appeal is taken certifies to the city
commission, after notice of appeal has been filed with him, that because of the facts stated in the
certificate a stay would, in the officer's opinion, cause imminent peril to life or property or that
because the violation charged is transitory in nature a stay would seriously interfere with
enforcement of the Code.
(C) Restraining Orders. If certification occurs in accordance with subsection (B)
above, proceedings may not be stayed except by a restraining order, which may be granted by
the city commission or by a court of record on application, on notice to the officer from whom
the appeal is taken and on due cause shown.
(D) Appeal Hearing. The city commission shall hear and enter a decision on all
appeals within sixty (60) days of the date of filing said appeal, and shall provide due notice of
the appeal to the parties.
(E) Commission Action. The city commission may reverse, affirm or modify any
order, requirement, decision or determination appealed from and shall make any order,
requirement, decision or determination that, in the city commission's opinion, ought to be made
in the circumstances.
LDC Amendment
May 26, 2009
Page 3 of 3
(F) Modification Allowed. When practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships
would result from carrying out the strict letter of a Code provision, the city commission may, in
passing upon appeals, vary or modify any regulation or provision of the Code relating to the
use, construction or alteration of buildings or structures or the use of land, so that the spirit of
the Code is observed, public safety and welfare secured, and substantial justice done.
(G) Prior Denials. The city commission shall not be required to hear an appeal or
application previously denied if it finds that there has been no substantial change in conditions
or circumstances bearing on the appeal or application.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the proposed amendments to Section 20- 6.2(A) as set forth above be
approved.
Attachments:
Public Notices
TJ V /SAY
X: \PB\PB Agendas StaffReports\2009 Agendas Staff Reports \5- 26- 09\PB -09 -011 LDC Amend ERPB Appeal Time.doc
ao
m >
7• W
as `omT
Ec rm
'_a =mm
OO goy
Ny ' ca °m-
�C :�gBEH
m
~O '.wi=
Fir Q
. W�EG�
O
x •c
_
WLLNd�
UE
03 oi�
ZmUmB
apwJZw,,;owN•-wa_ww ¢ z Zazwwzoga>:z
OZUaW62 >a_SV�ZUpWS >SSpa _pO�rwa=!0
VIOZWOOaLLpFy- ~YtOLO�QWWYSLLO U�U ~ }� LLom U'
,Z<005 a!a wz f°z w :J Oz W LW.6i Wo 3 W a Z
S J '¢ Z22 y yZ a a� Z 2220w>�OZ5-86DO6�<zxp
U a00fN3m$q!�de r~/)dQNF¢- Qm0O¢CC ) ww*QV OQOyMomu<%%b
ooxoo tNiZQmo :g" 3y�U TP WmdWU W'a
U SF OULLd
ZLL W.n"'�OUaW¢ ^Wm Y87QOW,w J_Za
¢f m<OQ U¢pf0 >g��-dmxw >m0�? �LL2WOFpmu >p>F
OJO¢SLLNUa�Z¢2 =Fpwy Owe w¢daOU
iSN'OOa yji Q ^2dOOwma< UWW �ZwOnQ. li
�- -Od• (7W" z
w JW UO Ya ffLLUm^¢VWf cO�¢ >Z ¢ OF2- Oaga mw OU a Wz. whz, u
LLyQW6Ua0iOQ�imQJOWOr�OW wLLSwandmc7wzw
OQZ x.d2 W22yyi°� YOd¢ >H UOWr Uoz?� �
W 0f m,'o:CO.P2,LZ�7 awdaaFO azxro¢ Ouauyap
IZDZM ZOCI. U1�W 2ZN�F -F ¢/S- NaOVm> pmZWZQd >JZZ>
u m a Q oar
¢=f O�.OUw¢oy<n 0o Uzww°j.,.W OfzN= >¢uWiUN?w
_p� -d'x ¢w =oazwm�odx¢¢0241> �W,?a0 w000LL
R8 F Z W U W a 2 O o U W W O H O o W LL z o `< o� ¢ Z¢ Z W¢ u
Q o 6 Q�y O> a Y m H d O a O> O y d y y W a U Q N. dad 6 O O W
W
O
m.4Rm m<
°m Lm
°m
O wN O Oz
t a
¢ a1-= 3 z¢pWp
oOH OE r,
. 2
a'�i m
4 Z 0 0 0 j m
W E
�z=w
rQ w
N p J y> m O pua
n 5 2
O=Q O¢LL0O2F-
o O JH
w m V
2¢OyQ QZ
U
x
E d V
N
f w WOWN<z
S m WO .
O WQU'SZ_ -»
�Z
EzaO �
>LL
t
¢WW¢O¢OZ w �
`2 lalJya2�f,A wz>O:
Cm
L :U cU
�m
5 ^o�n
�.QGO�S��i O
Ua OZEWMW.m
}O O opW d
UWdpa�QW2(7
Qdl-Z� >pw OZ
a2 O ¢O
z =a wly- ~ua0aya
a 2¢- Z¢••¢
n -2•. 2V
13 2cco
Q
F ¢�U --OWw00
'Uwoo
Qp wOfZEvWi ?dU
=dd �=.WO�ZOO¢
O =a�ZWWOQQ00
.; u �t
(�> §tz
SSEmgE -
ZOWLLQ7
a:�W O J a
Z6 Z,
60Zwm -�OQJU
~1¢-yF
>NZ°rr1wVWZ Z
m6°'�nE
¢2<dOZWdaU..
O} Wwar 2?U
¢LLOQ�3UxQ
�E6�( �Z W. �mWa
W O
OU
�LLaZQJW70¢Vi-
O_rF[ -QO ZU
M
m u
cnm -$ms
S 7 V 6 m W O LL
J W N o¢
Q W
TO)z-W<Q
F F_ O Z Z J W U>
� m
N.
W~Oo>d72Z
w2>F- �y�"L0�2tWil?�
'U jwZadQUJ¢ZO
S
•^ OmNG3
g
3pdwU
�- mw
LL
LLOE W0VmJmaWU WOWO¢I¢ i
O ~W
~Wa
E 9G •
O'Z
J
o Vo _W
-
w z! ia
Q X
U p jaOU� z
a
wwmf2 mp
2
aW UaEdE Acm v
Z>
�¢¢-y
aw
mow,z:
zro
?� > W
WWW �i
9
r
�? E m
LL
z �wp¢o
oQ
;L
w .,Co
a¢ ?
~wwwm
Oi U~¢OOW?s go
a
8> �
O ~ ir o
OO O i
0
w>Z Zu¢ LL
�aoSc7n
Oo
ZOOOC�mO¢
n
m
m �zu0 T
;98n�a.
cOm o
31
Oam,.oO< a LLJww
i x_ c8'^
j
ggbE;.�Eo
ao
m >
7• W
as `omT
Ec rm
'_a =mm
OO goy
Ny ' ca °m-
�C :�gBEH
m
~O '.wi=
Fir Q
. W�EG�
O
x •c
_
WLLNd�
UE
03 oi�
ZmUmB
apwJZw,,;owN•-wa_ww ¢ z Zazwwzoga>:z
OZUaW62 >a_SV�ZUpWS >SSpa _pO�rwa=!0
VIOZWOOaLLpFy- ~YtOLO�QWWYSLLO U�U ~ }� LLom U'
,Z<005 a!a wz f°z w :J Oz W LW.6i Wo 3 W a Z
S J '¢ Z22 y yZ a a� Z 2220w>�OZ5-86DO6�<zxp
U a00fN3m$q!�de r~/)dQNF¢- Qm0O¢CC ) ww*QV OQOyMomu<%%b
ooxoo tNiZQmo :g" 3y�U TP WmdWU W'a
U SF OULLd
ZLL W.n"'�OUaW¢ ^Wm Y87QOW,w J_Za
¢f m<OQ U¢pf0 >g��-dmxw >m0�? �LL2WOFpmu >p>F
OJO¢SLLNUa�Z¢2 =Fpwy Owe w¢daOU
iSN'OOa yji Q ^2dOOwma< UWW �ZwOnQ. li
�- -Od• (7W" z
w JW UO Ya ffLLUm^¢VWf cO�¢ >Z ¢ OF2- Oaga mw OU a Wz. whz, u
LLyQW6Ua0iOQ�imQJOWOr�OW wLLSwandmc7wzw
OQZ x.d2 W22yyi°� YOd¢ >H UOWr Uoz?� �
W 0f m,'o:CO.P2,LZ�7 awdaaFO azxro¢ Ouauyap
IZDZM ZOCI. U1�W 2ZN�F -F ¢/S- NaOVm> pmZWZQd >JZZ>
u m a Q oar
¢=f O�.OUw¢oy<n 0o Uzww°j.,.W OfzN= >¢uWiUN?w
_p� -d'x ¢w =oazwm�odx¢¢0241> �W,?a0 w000LL
R8 F Z W U W a 2 O o U W W O H O o W LL z o `< o� ¢ Z¢ Z W¢ u
Q o 6 Q�y O> a Y m H d O a O> O y d y y W a U Q N. dad 6 O O W
W
O
°m Lm
°m
mE
mao "o
Lll
m cin�E
-
o
m >n 8,
am- c o
m
W�
$$m Omu 2`o E" co_oynv mE yE8
LL
iii m'
nmmmco'3
A�mymUS��`on
^ p
m
tiE�
�m v
�
L =n
G::
E ¢
E
Y
4 r
Qc
r
o4
uWH rc
t " _m @
"
i x_ c8'^
a
c
zU�w
D9 f
o�
>
¢
o
$c0�m m$ma
Tm6 Ym m
T
t
n
Qa
�oJE
ma
oy - - a ma
m ¢l2 -�
3
2Z
F-
O¢
o
c
X m
N3 c m �m o 15 mm
m
`GVmLCWTaL.•C�•s
v u m c
Q y
$ w S o
-.1`
y m
8 m o,m
$1 a o
m
m o
F\
N
LL O
O
2 w U�
¢ J m
m W a J C@
LL U
O J
?
X a N
m 6
L y O mm O m V j Q
E c L m L.V
9
E V
J ¢
a W
f
H'O
dUi a o S
j W- c. (1)
m
]
Ud
t..
m n
5 3 °
m>
z °comayc
a2Lo) LtLL m nm m o
o
y
m >
y'U
�• �? N R .�` °' H E E n o H o t'- CD w W
0 A a ._ v .c d a a °� > >i � c `E° •- LL . -, •3 � R c :o � `° c m G � Y y
U) ooc° m3 d�A acE� v` -° ¢ °�oE �a° gRO
ay 0 R d y 0 U R O Y� 2 O R
O = of a, •E H m o °xai m °- m c v« L o
2
E o m c A ° o c r 2 2 aC
w 3
o v ie o m A o Q
m
O
W cc
N r O
O O E Z— E:2 E R r E t � p Q
L E O y d - H O
o CID Y c~ a
N
L Cp . -. � � p` C � O � M N ONO d p C N .3 - R N� L 0 0� C O
I0. ° ° c? of o $ H> ° c o EY ES�°'o oL m c� 3 a U ac `
A o o m a v W AIL
OT 11 O U C 6�9 C 9 - y N ~, a N '� O p T O - O N O a O C p C N U C
a V E E 2 t o d E .` �a o to
«" ROC OOOp U aO
_,Z: 'QwNLN iVCR °' R Odu7 20n:¢
N0 WnR OL nrL O N l yy R QC NjNVIyM1 ,WW
R> O R n R C C O L7 R T .� 'O y f`7 W J w
_I C O .. O N Ca "' O G d vOi O °> C R O O IL L� O n C C y C p y
as of p_ O c N cv a m R R E 'c ° a� -- E o R n'E 0 E- E R m U c Ic to Q w v
�� O W E E N -�-' `� A N N R c E N v d. o A c m o 3 3 Q E E <o cv c R o o fn rn
W o Z °' o A c o a o. E¢ rn [7
Q {L J y >> p c�li N> c y~ 3 rn 3 rV .o '`a a K y R t!a Nn L.. G d U A >o A E d 0 R �• H O J I� Z
o 6s w o m w c U > a O "' ^L oo cu i E p R Y LL r v�
1�. W v ? o v E ° r^ = T °' �` a .2 o °E' -E oT c 2
r C m aw d o c as- n- L: o c m.c Y'..'�._ a T2
E d a = L V R— R 'O y
m E �° .`°� E N L °' °> N `-° Z m E L > N -�
W °� rC U
.T. U =° A L c °c °>'' N d H N N E O C A L Y O O p :N °- � >' C d N — c • R °U E °z y =
J E A C =--
O > Q s
O y y O C Q 2 W Z Q
W F- o I� r-a !°i OO I aN f7 i 'RO c E E d EN a a E N O W W
U. n O J d
o LL
Nth Q nQ nR U N D o o C1 LLSS Q
a
Z
LLI
V
m
W
MuV
Z
r O
B p
n cn p
Z3
0 J E E
ua l-) as -o>° °
p O o
QOM Z as -�
(n n p d'O J
0 mU O
N d V r
C U. q d au Z
p OIL-- Q =
lOM Jv �� mtV ~
rn EL° a
ai .'`'QN
'n n� q y � O 41 d- a N L
COQ N m , O m ti O Q
-p N� EM O CU rTJ Cm
of c ON 00 p .p 43T
G
'U.
0.0�`'��
� i C 0> - C- d d U T
Z3 m u?Fa °p 3- E,
L y -
m i "f U 5li
- �
z v o n(qN
O N U C
O w2.c� ��CMiQN m C.6
O m ` d
A 2 m�O�l -1y C ° u O fl.
C.
U aO.a dam CCU N L V
Eo
.z.�too.'TOZ8O> N n
r
Cl> a
fae "div�eE¢wtu�um
O O U - an d
<< w
U uw W ¢JJ - a O0 z w w - W z 00
JF Q _ � Fw}0 / 0wO 0 g � oWn
LwU
Z ..
UN¢Dwzz x -�¢ Z� <c ,
wz " z¢3a�o!� W wOo }
ZW a�� o wo UwU0 i m�d !0
v a t -
u °
O( y ¢ LLa x ¢ w0cr L m !- qoa
11 a OQ O W n O 2 On >U 0Z <LLQ m UO WZ ¢
a - Z wx 0C i* O
V O> OUUm W 2 a a IQ ��LL J W m ZJ
9752 M u ¢ wg W Zw(n-_F-< <
w0 <N<c0= >ir a2 zoQw Oa M. 0¢wg0Z
¢ i N WxU ¢ j a0 w E
oiwl-OO,o � � OQw F- i= (n -P3?2 n 3
wu� m0 w >>
W 5 O Q OO ¢ Z��
U- H <a F- - g ~~ J a X Ox>
° r O wz � i>- Z' LL `4.OZm N °Qy Q mO <w O CL C0
` �W O O J x O
mOW a ZZ- o �Z 5_ WF_UWZ ,o��ZO W w v) F-
m O¢ - -¢pLL O a
¢ m «a O p =0�? ¢ ,° W"'-g w¢7 nwz <wLLOw E
•p J °!- Q W Z b V. a 7 z <W U ir
Y iFO LL< 0z 0 ZLLw<< E
ou)
m U W- QO W- U m Q Z' W Z V F LL O OQ�
ii ° az°wmU z�¢2�w; °l> E E' 0�= <-w &
LL, U y ` LLOO -, w zz : 'a 'oo z�¢ °owQZO°c O�OLLLL t
0O Z O :E a m p0 5� y Z -12 WO
wvz ? d 4 c °a „ '
0 SEE aw¢oiW °F�zar 3: F- (0 z a.�i � aoa A o ��_`°
O UrLLOF-2 0ZO050 O]OLL Wpb t OWUI x vi zN c nV9
LdJUU OZ :3-2 w�a,a0 -a zmw <zz zo'lo zF�LL¢Z F- �gOZ y a�
UU Y 0 0� W QF m�O�p <m Z wZCi U Z O N¢U Z❑ 7� W Z(n U� ww N C o O W m
U' w Zn(D Oaoax W O -O w¢ (�P wwaz r awwF¢> d
�o"'zwz Wow ��N�x gLLZ�o gn�wWF o�2OUO a �t
>�E <U LL- �F -zwx¢¢ CJ5¢� <OOa¢ <aa2NZ o Ofa_w¢ (a v3
mycT cwi�Q�zLLOFjzzQ Zaa!Za - }z_ 0wwmp 0aro 0� UN�zO� m r AuQE
W --.- ZOOOI <Uwzmw, <a W lyl lL a¢NO W Q WO W lLO ZZ<WFQ E a
w OIL �NW2a: :3 QmOr DOIx-Z¢ OZ?QO OVA <WF ?C3 C7W QLL C d ooOw
T- C.. ¢O<u1Zm~ >U ¢ W Og ¢_D U Q¢_O >< OO W w W < _my9
y'ro C Q�fnJ } Q YZ=p w <W OH ¢U O gzOZ 00�¢ UU ¢ ZFZ N U N d °t °o
-d rwF<..ww¢QUmxm F- >0 Nw Jz LL50iw Ow zp L y
W 2 E Z O Z O 1> o< 0 0 0 O Z Z O z Z Z O� J O Z w O J W m Z - CL Oz C m 0
Ci U a <<OF- EM3:OQ ZHm a_ W W < aNQQN a¢ULL¢U aa! -LLU< �n
r0-p ~►.� J O9$
O O
J
. ZLLr� I(°. < aaEco
L m-6c
o
o vo d m mT F p E Q L .`a Z_j L Op a y d d _ g uy �`�..tvs °g d -i : C r�zO y N 3 a 2m N`o L .oa a°iE ,o+• -«C ocu •u �r o dd L cc >� , E`U mp3 � o
V ` � ad
Ljj T JvN c." '° d d .z
o .9 N M C C O n N U d d _° p
Z 0 2 L O m &0 E0 .2d t5 0
nd > m n«
tl-m
L ' 0 E 'C n
0
n2M 3ZQ �50° uL'n .. Z
' C M E OO CO � v d
d O d O O N _ VZ
a =°N C O �� �« °Y ncoO dLc COdp LO m O m OE 0-T
l3W O i O Q 7 O
o° M Qd .L ° 3u o�p- ci Q cLd , -x E 2 . c P
EE vE °n p�O 0 �7°3 O � O
c j^ UV EO d i° 0 o EO 0
O C O «� p d V a LL
O U °N oL O p N E
apopoEmE c2pao(m W po eU - EmO odd,�uo;naEoauo0 •O E22 '6 - O d oy 2
o _ Vm ✓�d Q,4.¢ O Um .. 0 U 0 0 U cc 3 O U w ° u. uc c up ,y O 0 p �M M )
•lueluoo Rue esodlndel jo 11o!dxe Real Rue u! jo 1s)1— en!leepep Ole— lou hew no,, •pelea!pul eBed pue alep e4l uo p!eleH !we!W Ni ul peleadde pe 044 le4l aauep!ne en!sn!auoa se pap!noid s! (21)Iee49-3 s!41
:uonduosaa 'Mve :adl -0100
apeQ/S£SJIsalgeo SHSN :9u0Z/a6ed/U0P9S S'LXE :aZ1S
IWVIW HinoS do Am :J9s!119npy Z0ZS089E8 :jagwnN uOSlasul
:aweN luallo ZOZS089ES :jagwnN PV
600VU /M :0412 uopeoijgnd
IL