The URL can be used to link to this page

7615 SW 62 AVE ERPB-07-078-000 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI b ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW & PRESERVATION BOARD To: Chair & Members, Environmental Date: October 7, 2008 Review & Preservation Boar Tuesday 8:30 a.m. Via: Ricardo Soto-Lopez MUP Planning Director From: Lourdes Cabrera Hernandez Re: ERPB-07-078 Planner d Ir Applicant: Manuel Gutierrez Location: 7615 SW 62 Avenue, South Miami Request: NEW CONSTRUCTION: Final Review: Third Review , BACKGROUND STATUS REPORT (UP TO DATE): The application has appeared twice before the Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB), on May 20, 2008 and last year on September 18, 2007, and received Preliminary approval with conditions from the Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB) for the new construction of the proposed one-story dentist office building, located at the above referenced location. Upon the first ERPB approval the applicant was ready to consult with the engineers for engineering plans in order to submit for final approval from the ERPB. However, due to a change in the structural system, which had altered the facades of the building the applicant appeared before the ERPB a second time. The Board had no architectural building design comments and the architect proceeded with the engineering portion of the project. Attached copies of the Planning Department letter and excerpt minutes of the ERPB meeting of May 20, 2008 and September 18, 2007. APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Mr. Manuel Gutierrez, the architect of record, is requesting final approval from the Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB) for the new construction of the proposed one-story dentist office building. At this time, the conditions from the ERPB meetings have been addressed as noted on plans. The driveway curb cut has been reduced to twenty two feet in width as oppose to twenty-three feet. Another condition was the request for a lighting scheme. A proposed electrical plan has been submitted. Sheet E-1, illustrates an Electrical Site Plan, fixture schedule, riser diagrams and electrical specifications. Furthermore, a barrier free has been proposed as seen on the site plan, sheet A-1.1 and clearly seen on the elevations and noted as number 1. aluminum railing. BOUNDARY SURVEY: The Plan of Survey has been signed and sealed by the professional surveyor and mapper, Mr. Mario Prats Jr. The survey indicates vacant land and was updated and revised on April 17, 2008, legal description and subdivision "Map of Larkin Pines." 7615 SW 62 Avenue ERPB-07-078 presented on October 7, 2008 New Construction: Final Page 2 of 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS: The current vacant land has a net lot size of 10,505.25 square feet and a frontage width of 75 feet, facing SW 62 Avenue. Pursuant to Section 20-3.5(G) of the Land Development Code, a minimum lot size net area of 7,500 square feet and a frontage of 75 feet are required. CIVIL PLANS: The set of plans include as a standard submittal requirement for final review and approval from the ERPB the grading, paving and drainage plan, sheet C-2. In addition, a geometry plan, detail and water and sewer plan, sheets C-1, C-3 and C-4. LANDSCAPE PLAN: The landscape plan, plant list and existing tree chart is included (Sheet Drawing L-1) as part of this submittal. The ERPB concluded at the first review, on September 18, 2007, that the proposed landscape was "heavy landscape" and no conditions pertaining to such were a part of the motion. ZONING DISTRICT: "RO" Residential Office. The intent of this district is to provide suitable sites which will accommodate the limited office space needs of certain low impact professional services in attractive low profile buildings on heavily landscaped sites, architecturally similar and compatible with nearby single-family structures. The district should serve as a transitional buffer between established single-family neighborhoods and major traffic arterials or more intensive uses, and is appropriate in areas designated "Residential Office" or "Low Intensity Office on the city's adopted Comprehensive Plan. ZONING USE: The proposed one-story dentist building is permitted by right within the Permitted Use Schedule, Section 20-3.3(D) of the Land Development Code. This section of the code sets the parking requirement of one (1) parking space per two hundred 200 square feet. The proposed parking requirement calculations are indicated on the zoning information table of the site plan (Sheet Drawing A-1.1). The minimum required on site parking spaces are fifteen (15), and nineteen (19) on site parking spaces are proposed including one (1) handicap parking space, an excess of four (4) parking spaces. Pursuant to the Off-Street Parking Requirements, Section 20-4.4(8)(10) for a dentist office use the requirement are one (1) space per two hundred (200) square feet of gross floor area as follows: 2,996.48sq.feet X lspace _14.9824spaces 15spaces 1 200sq.feet SITE PLAN: The building dimensional requirements are guided by Section 20-3.5(G) of the Land Development Code. The proposed building coverage (3,149.01 square feet or 29.97 percent of the maximum building coverage) does not exceed the maximum building coverage of thirty percent allowed by the Land Development Code. The calculation in the site plan (project data) for the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) (3,114.27 square feet or 29.64 percent of the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) does not exceed the allowable maximum floor area ratio of .3 required by the Land Development 7615 SW 62 Avenue ERPB-07-078 presented on October 7, 2008 New Construction: Final Page 3 of 4 Code. The proposed impervious coverage includes the building and the proposed impervious parking, driveways, and walkways surface area. The calculation provided for impervious coverage (7,606 square feet or 72.40 percent) does not exceed the 75 percent maximum impervious coverage allowed (7,878.94 square feet or 75 percent) by the Land Development Code. ELEVATIONS: The proposed design indicates building height, details and materials of the proposed elevations, sheet A-2.1, which reflect the one-story building with standing seam metal roof, hardy board siding, and corbels keystone finish. Although a rendering has been submitted and exterior paint colors were previously discussed and approved by the ERPB, the applicant will present a color rendering at the time of the meeting. Most important the paint colors selected take into consideration the building's architectural design. The proposed one-story dentist office building consists of nineteen (19) parking spaces on site at three (3) feet, ten(10) inches below grade (elevation 0'-0") and three (3) feet, ten (10) inches above grade, a total of seven (7) feet, eight (8) inches from floor to ceiling. Pursuant to Section 20-2.3, Definitions, of the Land Development Code, Basement. Shall mean that portion of a building between the floor and ceiling, which has at least one-half of its height below grade, and the ceiling of which is not more than four(4) feet, six (6) inches above grade. Pursuant to Section 20-4.4(E)(8), Required parking Improvements, of the Land Development Code, Parking under buildings. Parking in structures forming a ground floor of a structure is prohibited in all RS, RT, RM, RO, and NR districts. Parking in structures forming a basement is prohibited in all RS and RT districts. RECOMMENDATION: Final Approval with the following conditions: 1. Consistent with the requirements set forth in Section 20-3.1, Land Development Code, Zoning Use Districts and purposes; 2. Consistent with the requirements set forth in Section 20-3.3(D), Land Development Code, Dimensional Requirements Nonresidential Districts; 3. Consistent with the requirements set forth in Section 20-3.5(G), Land Development Code, Dimensional Requirements Nonresidential Districts; 4. Meet the requirements set forth in the adopted Stormwater Ordinance; 5. Signage for the building is not a part of this application; 6. The site lightning plan be designed with exterior lighting directed downward to reduce light pollution and, 7. Any comments and/or suggestions from the Board. Attachments: • ERPB letter, dated May 20, 2008 • ERPB Excerpt minutes, dated May 20, 2008 7615 SW 62 Avenue ERPB-07-078 presented on October 7, 2008 New Construction: Final Page 4 of 4 • ERPB letter, dated September 18, 2007 • ERPB Excerpt minutes, dated September 18, 2007 • Current Photographs of surrounding properties • Rendering: to be presented at the meeting Set of plans 24"' x 36" Sheet Title: • Cover Sheet- Rendering and Index of Drawings • Civil Drawings, sheet C-1 thru C-4 • _Landscape plan, sheet L-1 • Architectural Drawings • Structural Drawings • Mechanical / Plumbing Drawings • Electrical Drawings On file: • ERPB Application dated August 27, 2007 • Property Survey, dated April 17, 2008 • Section 20-3.1 Zoning use districts and purposes • Section 20-3.3(D) Permitted Use Schedule • Section 20-3.5G Dimensional Requirements Nonresidential Districts • Stormwater Ordinance No. 06-07-1907 • Copies of the Building Department's permit record search • Land Master File Inquiry • Miami-Dade Property Information • Rendering: West Elevation • Photographs of subject and surrounding Properties • Plan of Survey, dated March 22, 2007 LCH Z:\ERPB\ERPB Agendas\2008 ERPB AGENDAS\OCTOBER 7,2008\ERPB-07-078FINAL.doc Sour+ 04 'err a. q F+ U • INCORPORATED • 1927 C p Ito May 20, 2008 J Re: Environmental Review&Preservation Board—Final Approval Applicant: Manuel Gutierrez Project: New Construction: Preliminary Address: 7615 SW 62 Avenue ERPB No.: ERPB-07-078 Meeting Date: May 20,2008 Dear: Mr. Gutierrez, The intent of this correspondence is to formally inform you that the City of South Miami Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB) has approved your application with the condition that the curb cut be adjusted to 23' instead of 22'. The next step in the plan review process is to. submit an application for building permit. Please contact the Building Department at(305) 663-6358. The final approval from the ERPB shall lapse after six (6) months if no permit is applied for. This requirement can be found in Section 20- 5.11(L), entitled Expiration, Land Development Code. Please be advised that an appeal of an ERPB decision or recommendation may be filed with the City Clerk at any time before a building permit is issued. Appeals may be submitted by the applicant, interested citizens, or the city administration [Section 20-6.2 (A), City Land Development Code]. If you have any questions regarding this application; please contact Ms. Lourdes Cabrera- Hernandez at the Planning Department, between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday at 305-663-6347. Sincere , S ford Youki ' Acting Planning Director Planning Department Y:\ERPB\ERPB Letters\2008 Letters\ERPB FINAL WITH CONDITIONS07-078.doc 4)-.[ERPB-07-078f? Applicant: Manuel Gutierrez Location: 7615 SW 62 Avenue Request: New Construction: Preliminary Applicants Present: Manuel Gutierrez Mrs. Cabrera- Hernandez read the item and staff's conditions into the record. Mr. Trautman questioned if the widows walk was still a part of the item. Mrs. Cabrera- Hernandez replied that the windows walk was removed, but the Board's suggestions from the last meeting are still implemented. The applicant is returning because the tenant did not like the previous design and decided to make changes. The building has heavier timber which includes a PH change that could be seen by fewer beams shown from the outside. Mr. Trautman questioned if the roof was a flat portion. The applicant responded that there was a flat portion and it was difficult to have all the beams touching each other. Mr. Trautman questioned if the floor plan was squared. The applicant responded the floor plan is not a square, but it will not be noticeable from the street considering there is a little slant where the points could meet. Mr. Trautman questioned why the applicant did not consider a ridge. The applicant responded that the structural engineering company attempted it but could not come up with the solution to the problem. The reason being is because the beams are spaning (55 by 60) and everything is transferring from those four beams on the outside. Mr. Trautman commented that if the main problem is getting the roof in two different slopes that look like a pyramid then it cannot be done with a slight ridge that has the same slope. The applicant replied that it was a problem for the engineering company and became pricey for the tenant. Mr. Trautman then questioned the change in angle in the roof that is not shown in any of the elevations. The applicant responded that he could not remember the exact dimensions. Mr. Trautman commented that the original design was better and it is unfortunate that the structural engineer could not find a solution to the problem. Mr..Fernandez questioned if a large roof was going to create problems. The applicant responded that it was designed in that manner because the client desired a large area. Mr. Fernandez commented that the roof has more volume then the space itself without the room included. The widows walk softened the slope preventing the look of a giant hat. The applicant commented that the roof is not going to be so overwhelming. ERPB Mins 05-20-2008 Pg 5 of 6 Mr. Balli suggested that a square ring, on top, would be a better solution because it will allow all the beams to touch. Instead of cutting them which causes a very difficult connection. He questioned if the owner explored the possibility of scissor trusses since he wanted big volume inside the space. Scissor trusses are inexpensive compared to timber and it still provides a lot of volume inside. The applicant responded that scissor trusses were considered, but the owner was not satisfied. Mr. Bedell commented that the curb cut shows 22 feet as opposed to 23 feet. Mrs. Mark commented that the building is the nicest building and that it will shine. Motion: Mr. Chandler moved to approve the application as presented with the condition that the curb cut be 22 feet instead of 23 feet. Vote: 6 Approved 2 Opposed (Mr. Fernandez and Mr. Trautman) V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Mr. Trautman moved to approve the minutes of April 15, 2008 with one change. Mr. Balli seconded. VI. Vote: 8 Approval 0 Opposed REMARKS: Remarks from the last Meeting: Mrs. Mark questioned whether or not the temporary banners, free standing signs and the Mc Donald's free standing sign were approved. Mr. Lightfoot replied that he.has not been updated the Code Enforcement, but that he will look into it. Mr. Balli recommended removing the two words "and/or" from section 20- 5.11 (E) (4) of the two story home draft ordinance No.27-07-1928. VII. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business,the meeting was adjourned at approximately 9:45 a.m. An appeal of an ERPB decision or recommendation may be filed at any time before a building permit is issued by filing same with the city clerk upon a form prescribed therefore. Appeals may be taken by the applicant,interested citizens,or the city administration[per§20-6.2(A)of the City's Land Development Code]. If you have any questions concerning this matter,please contact Lourdes Cabrera-Hernandez,of the Planning &Zoning Department,between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM,Monday through Friday,at 305.663.6347. Y:\ERPB\ERPB Minutes\2008 Minutes\May 06,2008\ERPB Mins May 20,2008.doc ERPB Mins 05-20-2008 Pg 6 of 6 � r U r' INCORPORATED 1927 r GORtp September 18, 2007 i r I Re: Environmental Review & Preservation Board—Preliminary Approval Project: New Construction: Preliminary Address: 2830 West S.R. 84, Suite 117 ERPB No.:07-078 Meeting Date: September 18, 2007 Dear Mr. Gutierrez: The intent of this correspondence is to officially inform you that the City of South Miami Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB) has preliminarily approved your application with conditions. You are required to appear before the ERPB for a second review. In order to process your application, you are required to re-submit fifteen (15) copies of the revised plans to the Planning Department. The deadline for re-submitting the revised plans is September 20, 2007. The ERPB will meet on October 2, 2007. If. you fail to meet the deadline requirements, your application will be assigned to the next regularly scheduled meeting. During the second meeting, the ERPB will either grant approval of your application with conditions or they can request additional modifications to the plan, if necessary. If you have any further questions regarding this application, please contact Ms. Lourdes Cabrera-Hernandez at the Planning Department, between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday at 305-663-6347. Sincerely, ui e or Planning Department JP X:\ERPB\ERPB Letters\2007 LettersTRPB SEPTEMBER 18,2007 LETTERS\ERPB PRELIMINARY APPROVAL-07-078.doc • INCORPORATED 1927 C Rt0 O CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW & PRESERVATION BOARD REGULAR MEETING Except Minutes Tuesday, September 18, 2007 8:30 AM I. CALL TO ORDER Action: Mr. Trautman, Chairman called the meeting to order at 8:35 A.M. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Action: The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison. III. ROLL CALL Action: Mr. Trautman performed roll call. Board members present constituting a quorum: Mr. Trautman, Mr. Chandler, Mr. Balli, Mrs. Mark, Mr. Bedell and Mr. Fernandez Board members absent: Mr. Jude, Mr. Rivera, and Mrs. Morales-Fernandez. City Staff present: Julian H. Perez (Planning Director), Lourdes Cabrera-Hernandez (Planner), Marcus Lightfoot(Permit Facilitator) and Michelle Valerio (Office Assistant.) IV. REQUESTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1) NEW CONSTRUCTION: PRELIMINARY: [ERPB-07-078] Applicant: Mr. Manuel Gutierrez Location: 7615 SW 62 Avenue Request: Applicant is requesting preliminary approval for a new construction. Applicant Present: Manuel Gutierrez and Mrs. Mariani Mrs. Cabrera read the item into the record. ERPB Mins 9- 18 -2007 Pg 1 of 3 1 Action: The architect Mr. Gutierrez presented himself to the Board and stated that the purpose of this project is an orthodontist/dentist office, this is a three thousand square foot facility that has basement parking. Mr. Fernandez stated that the parking requirement is fifteen parking spaces and you have nineteen spaces, since it abuts the residential neighborhood that a rear setback of five was increased to eight to provide a greater buffer, would it be possible to increase that even further by reducing the parking spaces. Mrs. Cabrera-Hernandez responded that they have more than a five foot buffer on all three sides of the property. The architect responded that being that they are a very busy practice, and they need the extra parking spaces. Mr. Chandler inquired if it was permissible that they only had one remote exit in the front when there is a requirement that parking needs two remote exits. Mr. Trautman responded that the requirement that he is referring to is for covered parking, which this basement is considered an open parking. Mr. Chandler expressed his concern on the drop of three feet ten inches that is without a hand rail around the parking. The applicant explained that the idea is to avoid the hand rail as far as aesthetics are concerned we were attempting to stop the entrance through the back, and perhaps a hedge on the sides would be suitable so that there would be no need to get through the back. He added that there are fences on the three sides of the property which are on the north, south, and west, he added that they are trying to avoid the use of rails along the property. Mr. Bedell then stated that people will be maintaining the landscaping and they should be kept in mind. Mr. Gutierrez responded affirmatively, and stated that if a gate could be placed it would restrict the back area rather than having rails all over the place. Mr. Chandler stated that the intent of the Land Development Code is being served here maybe nice and a bit insidious that it looks like a house but it is not which is clever. Mr. Chandler applauds the architect. Mr. Bedell stated that the roof is high and should be brought down. Mr. Gutierrez responded that it has been analyzed several times, but if the roof is brought down the building will not have a presence on street being that the both neighboring properties are two-story buildings. Mr. Balli inquired which roof system would be used. Mr. Gutierrez replied that rafters would be the system being used on the roof. Mrs. Mark inquired where the dumpster would be located. Mr. Gutierrez responded that coming out of the lounge there is a container with wheels which gets picked up by a private trash collector. Mr. Gutierrez stated that the procedure is the same as it would be for a residential pick up. Mrs. Mark inquired how the medical waste will be disposed of. Mrs. Mariani responded that . they have a small box where an individual comes to the inside of the facility and picks up the trash from a plastic bag. Mrs. Mark then expressed her concern with the four air conditioning systems which are in the rear, since directly behind is residential and to the south is residential maybe they should be moved to the north side because this would cause a noise issue. Mr. Trautman responded that anything above thirteen decibels will not be heard. Mr. Gutierrez explained that they have four air conditioning systems to avoid having the use of one big one. ERPB Mins 9- 18 -2007 Pg2of3 r Mr. Bedell stated that the landscape architect has heavy landscaping. Mrs. Mark questioned if there would be lighting in the parking area. Mr. Gutierrez responded affirmatively. Mrs. Mark stated that the applicant must show that on the plans for final approval. Motion: Mr. Trautman moved to grant preliminary approval for the project with the comments starting with the lighting scheme to be shown for the final presentation, to provide a scheme for a barrier fence and staff's conditions. Mr. Bedell seconded the motion. Vote: 6 Approved 0 Opposed 3 Absent (Mr. Jude, Mr. Rivera, and Mrs. Morales-Fernandez) V. ADJOURNMENT Action: There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at approximately 10:05 A.M. An appeal of an ERPB decision or recommendation may be filed at any time before a building permit is issued by filing same with the city clerk upon a form prescribed therefore. Appeals may be taken by the applicant,interested citizens,or the city administration[per§20-6.2(A)of the City's Land Development Code]. If you have any questions concerning this matter,please contact Lourdes Cabrera-Hernandez,of the Planning &Zoning Department,between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM,Monday through Friday,at 305.663.6347. MMV/LCH X:\ERPB\ERPB Minutes\2007 Minutes\ERPB MINS September 18,2007\ERPB Mins September 18,2007.doc ERPB Mins 9- 18 -2007 Pg 3 of 3 _ r 4 r9 Mw: - �1•�� ,pro ,¢�, un.i7�n9'. Part I. City of So th Miami PLANNI.NQ.,DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FEES DATE: CHECK NAME: ADDRESS: 2 A-Z?� HONE NO: 2 03.41.300 ERPB HEARING FEEI� �® a (Total) Applications for new construction in the RS and RT zoning districts Single unit ($500) All other applicati New constructio ($600 , enovation($300); Signs, fences, walls, etc. ($150) For each additions appearance before the Board($100) VARIANCE 02.19.161 Advertisement and Notice Fees ............................($1,000) 03.41.200 Admin Fee.......................................................($1000) (TOTAL$2000) EACH ADDITIONAL VARIANCE............................($75 0) SPECIAL USE/SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 02.19.161 Advertisement and Notice Fees ............................($1,000) 03.41.200 Admin Fee.......................................................($1000) (TOTAL$2000) 02.19.161 REZONING APPLICATION (less than 10 acres).........($4000) 02.19.161 REZONING APPLICATION (more than 10 acres).....($13,500) LDC TEXT AMENDMENT I(General standards,misc..provisions) 02.19.1.61 Advertisement and Notice Fees................................. ($1,000) 03.41.200 Admin Fee............... .......................................... ($1000) (TOTAL$2000) LDC TEXT AMENDMENT II(Change 6rW tt acl`use Schedule)-- 02.19.161 Advertisement and Notice Fees::................................ ($3,000) 03.41.200 Admin Fee............... .......................................... ($1000) TOTAL($4000) 02.19.161 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMEND AD FEE............$15,000) 03.41.200 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADMIN FEE....:.............($5,000). (Total$20,000) 02.19.161 ADMINISTRATIVE WAIVER AD FEE.......:...............($250) 03.41.200 ADMINISTRATIVE WAIVER FEE........................:.:($ 500) (Total$750) 02.19.161 PUDIMAJOR CHANGE LEGAL ADS($1,000) 03.41.200 PUDIMAJOR CHANGE ADMIN FEE($2,500) (Total $3500) 03.41.200 PUD MINOR CHANGE ADMIN FEE($1,000) 03.41.200 WAIVER-OF-PLAT APPLICATION($3,000) TOTAL �� ' E:\Forms\Receipt forms\Receipt form UPDATED-REV 12-21-04.doc sour� O� `Zrr F U " • INCORPORATED • 1927 RtO October 7, 2008 Re: Environmental Review&Preservation Board—Final Approval Applicant: Manuel Gutierrez Project: New Construction: Final Address: 7615 SW 62 Avenue ERPB No.: 07-078 Meeting Date: October 7,2008 Dear: Mr. Gutierrez, The intent of this correspondence is to inform you that the City of South Miami Environmental Review and Preservation Board(ERPB)has approved your application. The next step in the plan review process is to submit an application for building permit. Please contact the Building Department at(305) 663-6358. The final approval from the ERPB shall lapse after six (6) months if no permit is applied for. This requirement can be found in Section 20-. 5.1 l(L), entitled Expiration,Land Development Code. Please be advised that an appeal of an ERPB decision or recommendation may be filed with the City Clerk at any time before a building permit is issued. Appeals may be submitted by the applicant, interested citizens, or the city administration [Section 20-6.2 (A), City Land Development Code]. If you have any questions regarding this application, please contact Ms. Lluvia Resendiz at the Planning Department, between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday at 305- 663-6326. Sincere , Ricardo Soto-Lopez, MUP Planning Director Planning Department Y:\ERPB\ERPB Letters\2008 Letters\ERPB FINAL AS PRESENTED07-078.doc sour 04 �r U " • INCORPORATED 1927 O A p t S May 20, 2008 Re: Environmental Review&Preservation Board—Final Approval Applicant: Manuel Gutierrez Project: New Construction: Preliminary Address: 7615 SW 62 Avenue ERPB No.: ERPB-07-078 Meeting Date: May 20,2008 Dear: Mr. Gutierrez, The intent of this correspondence is to formally inform you that the City of South Miami Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB) has approved your application with the condition that the curb cut be adjusted to 23' instead of 22'. The next step in the plan review process is to. submit an application for building permit. Please contact the Building Department at(305) 663-6358. The final approval from the ERPB shall lapse after six (6) months if no permit is applied for. This requirement can be found in Section 20- 5.11(L), entitled Expiration, Land Development Code. Please be advised that an appeal of an ERPB decision or recommendation may be filed with the City Clerk at any time before a building permit is issued. Appeals may be submitted by the applicant, interested citizens, or the city administration [Section 20-6.2 (A), City Land Development Code]. If you have any questions regarding this application, please contact Ms. Lourdes Cabrera- Hernandez at the Planning Department, between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday at 305-663-6347. Sincere , c S ford Youkl Acting Planning Director Planning Department Y:\ERPB\ERPB Letters\2008 Letters\ERP13 FINAL WITH CONDITIONS07-078.doc 4)`[ERP13-07-0781 1 Applicant: Manuel Gutierrez Location: 7615 SW 62 Avenue Request: New Construction: Preliminary Applicants Present: Manuel Gutierrez Mrs. Cabrera Hernandez read the item and staff's conditions into the record. Mr. Trautman questioned if the widows walk was still a part of the item. Mrs. Cabrera- Hernandez replied that the windows walk was removed, but the Board's suggestions from the last meeting are still implemented. The applicant is returning because the tenant did not like the previous design and decided to make changes. The building has heavier timber which includes a PH change that could be seen by fewer beams shown from the outside. Mr. Trautman questioned if the roof was a flat portion. The applicant responded that there was a flat portion and it was difficult to have all the beams touching each other. Mr. Trautman questioned if the floor plan was squared. The applicant responded the floor plan is not a square, but it will not be noticeable from the street considering there is a little slant where the points could meet. Mr. Trautman questioned why the applicant did not consider a ridge. The applicant responded that the structural engineering company attempted it but could not come up with the solution to the problem. The reason being is because the beams are spaning (55 by 60) and everything is transferring from those four beams on the outside. Mr. Trautman commented that if the main problem is getting the roof in two different slopes that look like a pyramid then it cannot be done with a slight ridge that has the same slope. The applicant replied that it was a problem for the engineering company and became pricey for the tenant. Mr. Trautman then questioned the change in angle in the roof that is not shown in any of the elevations. The applicant responded that he could not remember the exact dimensions. Mr. Trautman commented that the original design was better and it is unfortunate that the structural engineer could not find a solution to the problem. Mr. Fernandez questioned if a large roof was going to create problems. The applicant responded that it was designed in that manner because the client .desired a large area. Mr. Fernandez commented that the roof has more volume then the space itself without the room included. The widows walk softened the slope preventing the look of a giant hat. The applicant commented that the roof is not going to be so overwhelming. ERPB Mins 05-20-2008 Pg 5 of 6 Mr. Balli suggested that a square ring, on top, would be a better solution because it will allow all the beams to touch. Instead of cutting them which causes a very difficult connection. He questioned if the owner explored the possibility of scissor trusses since he wanted big volume inside the space. Scissor trusses are inexpensive compared to timber and it still provides a lot of volume inside. The applicant responded that scissor trusses were considered, but the owner was not satisfied. Mr. Bedell commented that the curb cut shows 22 feet as opposed to 23 feet. Mrs. Mark commented that the building is the nicest building and that it will shine. Motion: Mr. Chandler moved to approve the application as presented with the condition that the curb cut be 22 feet instead of 23 feet. Vote: 6 Approved 2 Opposed (Mr. Fernandez and Mr. Trautman) V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Mr. Trautman moved to approve the minutes of April 15, 2008 with one change. Mr. Balli seconded. VI. Vote: 8 Approval 0 Opposed REMARKS: Remarks from the last Meeting: Mrs. Mark questioned whether or not the temporary banners, free standing signs and the Mc Donald's free standing sign were approved. Mr. Lightfoot replied that he has not been updated the Code Enforcement, but that he will look into it. Mr. Balli recommended removing the two words "and/or" from section 20- 5.11 (E) (4) of the two story home draft ordinance No.27-07=1928. VII. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at approximately 9:45 a.m. An appeal of an ERPB decision or recommendation may be filed at any time before a building permit is issued by filing same with the city clerk upon a form prescribed therefore. Appeals may be taken by the applicant,interested citizens,or the city administration[per§20-6.2(A)of the City's Land Development Code). If you have any questions concerning this matter,please contact Lourdes Cabrera-Hemandez,of the Planning &Zoning Department,between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM,Monday through Friday,at 305.663.6347. Y:\ERPB\ERPB Minutes\2008 Minutes\May 06,2008\ERPB Mins May 20,2008.doc ERPB Mins 05-20-2008 Pg6of6 t' CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& PRESERVATION BOARD �a To: Chair & Members, Environmental Date: May 20, 2008 Review & Preservation Boa d Tuesday 8:30 a.m. Via: Sanford A. Youkilis Acting Planning Direc'or From: Lourdes abr a-Hernandez Re: ERPB-07-078 Planner fe& Applicant: Manuel Gutierrez Location: 7615 SW 62 Avenue, South Miami Request: NEW CONSTRUCTION: Preliminary Review: Second Review STATUS REPORT (UP TO DATE): The application first appeared before the Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB), on September 18, 2007, and received preliminary approval with conditions from the Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB) for the new construction of, the proposed one-story dentist office building, located at the above referenced location. The conditions have been addressed and are incorporated in the new set of plans. The architectural building design did not need to be revised, since there were no architectural comments from the Board. Attached copy of the letter and excerpt minutes of the ERPB meeting of September 18, 2007. APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Mr. Manuel Gutierrez, the architect of record, is again requesting preliminary approval from the Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB) for the new construction of the proposed one-story dentist office building, due to a change in the structural system, which has altered the facades of the building. Upon ERPB preliminary approval of the revised plans, dated April 28, 2008, the architect will consult with the engineers for engineering plans and will submit for final ERPB approval. BOUNDARY SURVEY: See attached Plan of Survey, has been signed and sealed by the professional surveyor and mapper, Mr. Mario Prats Jr. The survey indicates vacant land and was updated and revised on April 17, 2008. The legal description, subdivision "Map of Larkin Pines" and location map are attached. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The current vacant land has a net lot size of 10,505.25 square feet and a frontage width of 75 feet, facing SW 62 Avenue. Pursuant to Section 20-3.5(G) of the Land Development Code, a minimum lot size net area of 7,500 square feet and a' frontage of 75 feet are required. The subject property is adjacent to RO zoning district on the sides and RS-3 Low-Density Residential at the rear. Furthermore, a one-story concrete block structure and swimming pool has been demolished since the first ERPB review. e 7615 SW 62 Avenue ERPB-07-078 presented on May 20, 2008 New Construction: Preliminary Page 2 of 4 LANDSCAPE PLAN: The landscape plan and legend is included (Sheet Drawing L-1) as part of this report. The ERPB concluded at the first review, on September 18, 2007, that the proposed landscape was "heavy landscape" and no conditions pertaining to such were a part of the motion. In addition, to the landscape plan, a grading and irrigation plan will be submitted for review and approval prior to final ERPB review. SITE PLAN (Zoning District: "RO" Residential Office District): The intent of this district is to provide suitable sites which will accommodate the limited office space needs of certain low impact professional services in attractive low. profile buildings on heavily landscaped sites, architecturally similar and compatible with nearby single- family structures. The district should serve as a transitional buffer between established single-family neighborhoods and major traffic arterials or more intensive uses, and is appropriate in areas designated "Residential Office" or "Low Intensity Office on the city's adopted Comprehensive Plan. The proposed one-story dentist building is permitted by right within the Permitted Use Schedule, Section 20-3.3(D) of the Land Development Code. This section of the code sets the parking requirement of one (1) parking space per two hundred 200 square feet. The proposed parking requirement calculations are indicated on the zoning information table of the site plan (Sheet Drawing A-1.1). The minimum required on site parking spaces are fifteen (15), and nineteen (19) on site parking spaces are proposed including one (1) handicap parking space, an excess of four (4) parking spaces. Pursuant to the Off-Street Parking Requirements, Section 20-4.4(B)(10) for a dentist office use the requirement are one (1) space per two hundred (200) square feet of gross floor area as follows: 2,996.48sq.feet x Ippace = 14.9824spaces z� 15spaces 1 200sgfeet The building dimensional requirements are guided by Section 20-3.5(G) of the Land Development Code. The proposed building coverage (3,149.01 square feet or 29.97 percent of the maximum building coverage) does not exceed the maximum building coverage of 30 percent allowed by the Land Development Code. The calculation in the site plan (project data) for the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) (3,114.27 square feet or 29.64 percent of the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) does not exceed the allowable maximum floor area ratio of .3 required by the Land Development Code. The proposed impervious coverage includes the building and the proposed impervious parking, driveways, and walkways surface area. The calculation provided for impervious coverage (7,606 square feet or 72.40 percent) does not exceed the 75 percent maximum impervious coverage allowed (7,878.94 square feet or 75 percent) by the Land Development Code. 7615 SW 62 Avenue ERPB-07-078 presented on May 20, 2008 New Construction: Preliminary Page 3 of 4 ELEVATIONS: The elevations have been revised and resubmitted (Sheet Drawing A- 2.1). The building height dimensions, building finishes and materials are noted on the elevations, plans dated April 28, 2008. A legend denotes proposed materials, building finishes, and exterior paint colors by Sherwin Williams. The exterior paint colors are reflected on the attached colored rendering of the front west fagade and the colors selected take into consideration the building's architectural design. For comparison purposes, 11"x17" copies of the elevations from the first ERPB review, dated August 31, 2007, are attached. The proposed one-story dentist office building consists of nineteen (19) parking spaces on site at three (3) feet, ten(10) inches below grade (elevation 0'-0") and three (3) feet, ten (10) inches above grade, a total of seven (7) feet, eight (8) inches from floor to ceiling. Pursuant to Section 20-2.3, Definitions, of the Land Development Code, Basement. Shall mean that portion of a building between the floor and ceiling, which has at least one-half of its height below grade, and the ceiling of which is not more than four(4) feet, six (6) inches above grade. Pursuant to Section 20-4.4(E)(8), Required parking Improvements, of the Land Development Code, Parking under buildings. Parking in structures forming a ground floor of a structure is prohibited in all RS, RT, RM, RO, and NR districts. Parking in structures forming a basement is prohibited in all RS and RT districts. RECOMMENDATION: Preliminary Approval with the following conditions: 1. Consistent with the requirements set forth in Section 20-3.1, Land Development Code, Zoning Use Districts and purposes; 2. Consistent with the requirements set forth in Section 20-3.3(D), Land Development Code, Dimensional Requirements Nonresidential Districts; 3. Consistent with the requirements set forth in Section 20-3.5(G), Land Development Code, Dimensional Requirements Nonresidential Districts; 4. Meet the requirements set forth in the adopted Stormwater Ordinance; 5. Submit the grading and irrigation plan prior to final ERPB approval; 6. Location map on site plan shall be consistent with zoning map; 7. Consistent with the requirements set forth in Section 20-4.4, Land Development Code, two way driveways — 22 feet; 8. Signage for the building is not a part of this application; and, 9. Any comments and/or suggestions from the Board. On file: • ERPB Application dated August 27, 2007 • Section 20-3.1 Zoning use districts and purposes • Section 20-3.3(D) Permitted Use Schedule • Section 20-3.5G Dimensional Requirements Nonresidential Districts • Stormwater Ordinance No. 06-07-1907 7615 SW 62 Avenue ERPB-07-078 presented on May 20, 2008 New Construction: Preliminary Page 4 of 4 • Copies of the Building Department's permit record search • Land Master File Inquiry • Miami-Dade Property Information • Rendering: West Elevation • Photographs of subject and surrounding Properties • Plan of Survey, dated March 22, 2007 Attachments: • ERPB letter, dated September 18, 2008 • ERPB Excerpt minutes, dated September 18, 2008 • Rendering: West Elevation • Plan of Survey, revised April 17, 2008 • 11"x17" copies of elevations for Comparison only Architectural Plans 24"' x 36" Sheet Title: • Site plan/Landscape plan, sheet A-1.1 • Basement Level, sheet A-1.2 • First Floor Plan, sheet A-1.3 • Elevations, sheet A-2.1 • Elevation and Sections, sheet A-2.2 • Landscape plan, sheet L-1 LCH Z:\ERPB\ERPB Agendas\2008 ERPB AGENDAS\May 20\ERPB-07-078R.doc soUTy � q r. U � • INCORPORATED 1927 � O [itlD September 18, 2007 Re: Environmental Review & Preservation Board—Preliminary Approval Project: New Construction: Preliminary Address: 2830 West S.R. 84, Suite 117 ERPB No.:07-078 Meeting Date: September 18, 2007 Dear Mr. Gutierrez: The intent of this correspondence is to officially inform you that the City of South Miami Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB) has preliminarily approved your application with conditions. You are required to appear before the ERPB for a second review. In order to process your application, you are required to re-submit fifteen (15) copies of the revised plans to the Planning Department. The deadline for re-submitting the revised plans is September 20, 2007. The ERPB will meet on October 2, 2007. If you fail to meet the deadline requirements, your application will be assigned to the next regularly scheduled meeting. During the second meeting, the ERPB will either grant approval of your application with conditions or they can request additional modifications to the plan, if necessary. If you have any further questions regarding this application, please contact Ms. Lourdes Cabrera-Hernandez at the Planning Department, between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday at 305-663-6347. Sincerely, Au e Ptnnn! �tor Planning Department JP X:\ERPB\ERPB Letters\2007 Letters\ERPB SEPTEMBER 18,2007 LETTERS\ERPB PRELIMINARY APPROVAL-07-078.doc Sour�i INCORPORATED 1927 tomato CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW & PRESERVATION BOARD REGULAR MEETING Except Minutes . Tuesday, September 18, 2007 8:30 AM I. CALL TO ORDER Action: Mr. Trautman, Chairman called the meeting to order at 8:35 A.M. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Action: The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison. III. ROLL CALL Action: Mr. Trautman performed roll call. Board members present constituting a quorum: Mr. Trautman, Mr. Chandler, Mr. Balli, Mrs. Mark, Mr. Bedell and Mr. Fernandez Board members absent: Mr. Jude, Mr. Rivera, and Mrs. Morales-Fernandez. City Staff present: Julian H. Perez (Planning Director), Lourdes Cabrera-Hernandez (Planner), Marcus Lightfoot(Permit Facilitator) and Michelle Valerio (Office Assistant.) IV. REQUESTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1) NEW CONSTRUCTION: PRELIMINARY: [ERPB-07-0781 Applicant: Mr. Manuel Gutierrez Location: 7615 SW 62 Avenue Request: Applicant is requesting preliminary approval for a new construction. Applicant Present: Manuel Gutierrez and Mrs. Mariani Mrs. Cabrera read the item into the record. ERP13 Mins 9- 18 -2007 Pg 1 of 3 Action: The architect Mr. Gutierrez presented himself to the Board and stated that the purpose of this project is an orthodontist/dentist office, this is a three thousand square foot facility that has basement parking. Mr. Fernandez stated that the parking requirement is fifteen parking spaces and you have nineteen spaces, since it abuts the residential neighborhood that a rear setback of five was increased to eight to provide a greater buffer, would it be possible to increase that even further by reducing the parking spaces. Mrs. Cabrera-Hernandez responded that they have more than a five foot buffer on all three sides of the property. The architect responded that being that they are a very busy practice, and they need the extra parking spaces. Mr. Chandler inquired if it was permissible that they only had one remote exit in the front when there is a requirement that parking needs two remote exits. Mr. Trautman responded that the requirement that he is referring to is for covered parking, which this basement is considered an open parking. Mr. Chandler expressed his concern on the drop of three feet ten inches that is without a hand rail around the parking. The applicant explained that the idea is to avoid the hand rail as far as aesthetics are concerned we were attempting to stop the entrance through the back, and perhaps a hedge on the sides would be suitable so that there would be no need to get through the back. He added that there are fences on the three sides of the property which are on the north, south, and west, he added that they are trying to avoid the use of rails along the property. Mr. Bedell then stated that people will be maintaining the landscaping and they should be kept in mind. Mr. Gutierrez responded affirmatively, and stated that if a gate could be placed it would restrict the back area rather than having rails all over the place. Mr. Chandler stated that the intent of the Land Development Code is being served here maybe nice and a bit insidious that it looks like a house but it is not which is clever. Mr. Chandler applauds the architect. Mr. Bedell stated that the roof is high and should be brought down. Mr. Gutierrez responded that it has been analyzed several times, but if the roof is brought down the building will not have a presence on street being that the both neighboring properties are two-story buildings. Mr. Balli inquired which roof system would be used. Mr. Gutierrez replied that rafters would be the system being used on the roof. Mrs. Mark inquired where the dumpster would be located. Mr. Gutierrez responded that coming out of the lounge there is a container with wheels which gets picked up by a private trash collector. Mr. Gutierrez stated that the procedure is the same as it would be for a residential pick up. Mrs. Mark inquired how the medical waste will be disposed of. Mrs. Mariani responded that they have a small box where an individual comes to the inside of the facility and picks up the trash from a plastic bag. Mrs. Mark then expressed her concern with the four air conditioning systems which are in the rear, since directly behind is residential and to the south is residential maybe they should be moved to the north side because this would cause a noise issue. Mr. Trautman responded that anything above thirteen decibels will not be heard. Mr. Gutierrez explained that they have four air conditioning systems to avoid having the use of one big one. ERPB Mins 9-. 18 -2007 Pg2of3 Mr. Bedell stated that the landscape architect has heavy landscaping. Mrs. Mark questioned if there would be lighting in the parking area. Mr. Gutierrez responded affirmatively. Mrs. Mark stated that the applicant must show that on the plans for final approval. Motion: Mr. Trautman moved to grant preliminary approval for the project with the comments starting with the lighting scheme to be shown for the final presentation, to provide a scheme for a barrier fence and staff s conditions. Mr. Bedell seconded the motion. Vote: 6 Approved 0 Opposed 3 Absent (Mr. Jude, Mr. Rivera, and Mrs. Morales-Fernandez) V. ADJOURNMENT Action: There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at approximately 10:05 A.M. An appeal of an ERPB decision or recommendation may be filed at any time before a building permit is issued by filing same with the city clerk upon a form prescribed therefore. Appeals may be taken by the applicant,interested citizens,or the city administration[per§20-6.2(A)of the City's Land Development Code]. If you have any questions concerning this matter,please contact Lourdes Cabrera-Hemandez,of the Planning &Zoning Department,between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM,Monday through Friday,at 305.663.6347. MMV/LCH X:\ERPB\ERPB Minutes\2007 Minutes\ERPB MINS September 18,2007\ERPB Mins September 18,2007.doc ERPB Mins 9- 18 -2007 Pg 3 of 3 c�.OUT� 04 � Al q f„ INCORPORATED 1927 L O RIp A CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW & PRESERVATION BOARD REGULAR MEETING MINUTES * .w Tuesday, October 7, 2008 8:30 AM I. CALL TO ORDER Action: Mr. Trautman (Chair), called the meeting to order at 8:30 A.M. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Action: The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison. III. ROLL CALL Action: Mr. Trautman performed roll call. Board members present constituting a quorum: Mr. Trautman, Mrs. Mark, Mr. Bedell, Mr. Chandler, Mr. Jude, Mr. Balli, Mrs. Morales- Fernandez and Mr. Fernandez Board members absent: Mr. Rivera City Staff present: Ricardo Soto-Lopez (Planning Director), Mrs. Lourdes Cabrera-Hernandez (Planner), Mr. Marcus Lightfoot (Permit Facilitator) and Alerik Barrios (Assistant) Staff absent: Lluvia Resendiz (ERPB Coordinator) IV.REQUESTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1) [ERPB-07-078] Applicant: Manuel Gutierrez Location: 7615 SW 62 Avenue Request: New Construction: Final Applicants Present: Mr. Gutierrez Mrs. Cabrera- Hernandez read the item into the record. The applicant gave the Board members a presentation on the scope of the project and an explanation of the color scheme for the building. ERPB Mins 10-07-2008 Pg 1 of 7 �a Mrs. Mark questioned if there was a proposed plan for lighting on the eves of the building's corner. The applicant responded in the negative. ,.Motion: Mr. Trautman moved to grant final approval. Simultaneously, Mrs. Mark and Mr. Balli seconded. Vote: 8 Approved 0 Opposed 2) [ERPB-08-071] Applicant: Mark Campbell For: "Coconut Grove Bank" Location: 6400 South Dixie Highway Request: Signage Installation Applicants Present: Mr. Husky Mr. Lightfoot read the item into the record. Without discussion the Board moved to approve the Signage Installation. Motion: Mr. Chandler moved to approve the application as presented. Mr. Fernandez seconded. Vote: 8 Approved 0 Opposed 3) [ERPB-08-072] Applicant: Mark Campbell For: "Verizon Wireless" Location: 6400 South Dixie Highway Request: Signage Installtion Applicants Present: Mr. Husky and Mr. Alt Mr. Lightfoot read the item into the record. Mr. Trautman questioned if Signage Master Plan illustrated score lines. The applicant replied in the affirmative. The Board members suggested that the applicant indicate the exact location of the score lines on the Signage Master Plan. The Board also recommended that the wording "Cellular Sales .com" be removed from the proposed signage. The applicant stated that the wording "Cellular Sales.com/Authorize Retail" is required wording, and Verizon requires them to market their products this way Mr. Chandler questioned if the applicant had a company letterhead. The applicant replied yes. Mr. Trautman questioned the possibility of the sign being split, Verizon wireless and Cellular sales. The applicant replied that Verizon Wireless signage must be set to Verizon's marketing standards. ERPB Mins 10-07-2008 Pg 2 of 7 SouT� 04� � r. • INCORPORATED •' 1927 LOgYD September 18, 2007 Re: Environmental Review & Preservation Board—Preliminary Approval Project: New Construction: Preliminary Address: 2830 West S.R. 84,Suite 117 ERPB No.:07-078 Meeting Date: September 18,2007 Dear Mr. Gutierrez: The intent of this correspondence is to officially inform you that the City. of South Miami Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB) has preliminarily approved your application with conditions. You are required to appear before the ERPB for a second review. In order to process your application, you are required to re-submit fifteen (15) copies of the revised plans to the Planning Department. The deadline for re-submitting the revised plans is September 20, 2007. The ERPB will meet on October 2, 2007. If you fail to meet the deadline requirements, your application will be assigned to the next regularly scheduled meeting. During the second meeting, the ERPB will either grant approval of your application with conditions or they can request additional modifications to the plan, if necessary. If you have any further questions regarding this application, please contact Ms. Lourdes Cabrera-Hernandez at the Planning Department, between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday at 305-663-6347. Sincerely, u1 e Pt= or Planning Department JP X:\ERPB\ERPB Letters\2007 Letters\ERPB SEPTEMBER 18,2007 LETTERS\ERPB PRELIMINARY APPROVAL-07-078.doc i R the actual window. The arc covering the first panel is too high and is not shown elsewhere. Mr. Chandler recommended eliminating the arched shutter. Motion: Mr. Bedell moved to grant preliminary approval subject to the following recommendations: • Two windows shall be added to the east elevation. • Revise the front elevation at the entry way in order to provide a vertical element. • Reconfigure or eliminate the arched shutter on either of the front arched windows. • Implement staff s conditions. Mr. Chandler seconded the motion. Mrs. Mark questioned whether the size of the driveway was too large. Mr. Trautman and Mr. Chandler responded that the driveway was further back and had a narrow entry. Mrs. Cabrera-Hernandez inquired whether the colors were approved. The Board members responded that further clarification regarding the location of the color will be needed. Vote: 5 Approved 0 Opposed 1 Recused (Mr. Balli) 3 Absent (Mr. Jude, Mr. Rivera and Mrs. Morales-Fernandez.) • Mr.Balli returned to the Board at this time. • Mr. Perez entered at this time. 3) NEW CONSTRUCTION: PRELIMINARY: [ ERPB-07-0781 Applicant:. Mr. Manuel Gutierrez Location: 7615 SW 62 Avenue Request: Applicant is requesting preliminary approval for a new construction. Applicant Present: Manuel Gutierrez and Mrs. Mariani Mrs. Cabrera read the item into the record. Action: Mr. Gutierrez advised the proposed project will be an orthodontist/dentist office. It will be a three thousand square feet facility with basement parking. Mr. Fernandez stated that the required parking was fifteen parking spaces and the plans identify nineteen spaces. He informed that because the project abuts the residential neighborhood a five feet rear setback was increased to an eight feet rear setback, providing a greater buffer. He inquired whether it would be possible to increase the rear setback beyond the eight feet by reducing the parking spaces. The architect responded that the business is always busy therefore they need the additional parking spaces. ERPB Mins 9- 18 -2007 Pg 4 of 7 Mr. Chandler inquired if the applicant was allowed to have one remote exit in the front if parking regulations require two remote exits. Mr. Trautman responded that the requirement Mr. Chandler referred to was for covered parking and this basement was considered an open parking. Mr. Chandler expressed concerns regarding the three feet by ten inch (3'-10') drop without a handrail around the parking. The applicant explained that the design concept was to avoid the handrail and eliminate the rear entrance. The applicant mentioned that a hedge on the sides would be suitable in order to avoid the need of a rear entrance. He added that there are fences on the north, south, and west side of the property. Mr. Bedell advised the applicant to consider the landscape maintenance. Mr. Gutierrez responded with and affirmative adding that if a gate were installed it would restrict the rear area. It would be a better option instead of having rails everywhere. Mr. Chandler commended the architect for following Land Development Code when creating the design. Mr. Bedell stated that the roof is too high and should be reduced. Mr. Gutierrez responded that it was analyzed several times but if the roof were reduced in height the building will not have a presence considering that the neighboring properties are two-story buildings. Mr. Balli questioned the type of roof system that would be used. Mr. Gutierrez replied that he will use rafters. Mrs. Mark questioned the location of the dumpster. Mr. Gutierrez responded that a container with wheels exits next to the lounge and it will be collected by a private trash collector. Mrs. Mark inquired how the medical waste will be.disposed. Mrs. Mariani, the applicant, responded that an individual collects the waste in a plastic bag which is taken from small box contained within the facility. Mrs. Mark expressed her concerns regarding the four air conditioning systems located at the rear. She recommended relocating the system to the north side in order to avoid noise concerns. Mr. Trautman responded that anything above thirteen decibels will not be heard. Mr. Bedell stated that the landscape architect has heavy landscaping. I Mrs. Mark questioned if the parking area would be lit. Mr. Gutierrez responded affirmatively. Mrs. Mark stated that the applicant must illustrate a lit parking area on the plans before final approval. Motion: Mr. Trautman moved to rant preliminary g p ary approval for the project with the following � conditions: • The lighting scheme shall be shown for the final presentation. • Provide a scheme for a barrier fence. • Staff's conditions. Mr. Bedell seconded the motion. v Vote: 6 Approved 0 Opposed 3 Absent (Mr. Jude, Mr. Rivera, and Mrs. Morales-Fernandez) ERPB Mins 9- 18 -2007 Pg5of7 li • CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& PRESERVATION BOARD (� To: Chair& Members, Environmental Date: September 18, 2007 Review & Preservati oard Tuesday 8:30 a.m. Via: Julian H. Per Planning DirecltW'__-�� From: Lourdes C brera- ernandez Re: ERPB-07-078 Planner V - v-*' Applicant: Manuel Gutierrez Location: 7615 SW 62 Avenue, South iami Request: NEW CONSTRUCTION: P eliminary Review: First Review 1, APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant is requesting preliminary approval from the Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB) for the new construction of the proposed one-story dentist office building, located at the above referenced location. BOUNDARY SURVEY: See attached Plan of Survey, has been signed and sealed by the professional surveyor and mapper, Mr. Mario Prats Jr. The survey was updated and revised on March 22, 2007. The legal description, subdivision "Map of Larkin Pines" and location map are included for the subject property. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The net lot size is 10,505.25 square feet and a frontage width of 75 feet, facing SW 62 Avenue. Pursuant to Section 20-3.5(G) of the Land Development Code, a minimum lot size net area of 7,500 square feet and a frontage of 75 feet are required. The existing one-story concrete block structure and swimming pool will be demolished. The subject property is adjacent to RO zoning district on the sides and RS-3 Low-Density Residential at the rear. LANDSCAPE PLAN: The landscape plan and legend is included (Sheet Drawing L-1) as part of this report. In addition, to the landscape plan, a grading and irrigation plan will be submitted for review and approval prior to final ERPB review. Pursuant to Section 20-4.5(D)(5)(b), Land Development Code, the minimum number of trees required for RO Zoning District are three trees per lot. The landscape plan on the plans, (Sheet Drawing L-1), includes plant list, existing tree chart, tree planting detail, and general notes. The proposed landscape plan indicates new trees, palms, and shrubs on private property. The proposed shrubs are chrysobalanus icaco (known as 49 cocoplum"), and will be located on the north and south property lines as a hedge along the perimeter of the site. The proposed buffer/hedge are continued at the rear of the site with acalypha wilkesiana (know as "copperleaf') and the landscape buffer widens from the minimum of five feet landscape buffer to eight feet minimum landscape buffer adjacent to the existing residential zoning district, RS-3. No landscape is proposed offsite on the swale area (Section 20-4.5(D)(3), of the Land Development Code). 7615 SW 62 Avenue ERPB-07-078 presented on September 18, 2007 New Construction: Preliminary Page 2 of 4 SITE PLAN (Zoning District: "RO" Residential Office District): The intent of this district is to provide suitable sites which will accommodate the limited office space needs of certain low impact professional services in attractive low profile buildings on heavily landscaped sites, architecturally similar and compatible with nearby single- family structures. The district should serve as a transitional buffer between established single-family neighborhoods and major traffic arterials or more intensive uses, and is appropriate in areas designated "Residential Office" or "Low Intensity Office on the city's adopted Comprehensive Plan. The proposed one-story dentist building is permitted by right within the Permitted Use Schedule, Section 20-3.3(D) of the Land Development Code. This section of the code sets the parking requirement of one (1) parking space per two hundred 200 square feet. The proposed parking requirement calculations are indicated on the zoning information table of the site plan (Sheet Drawing A-1.1). Pursuant to the Off-Street Parking Requirements, Section 20-4.4(8)(10) for a dentist office use the requirement are one (1) space per two hundred (200) square feet of gross floor area as follows: 2,996.48sq.feet X lspace _14.9824spaces 15spaces 1 200sgfeet The building dimensional requirements are guided by Section 20-3.5(G) of the Land Development Code. The proposed building coverage (3,149.01 square feet or 29.97 percent of the maximum building coverage) does not exceed the maximum building coverage of 30 percent allowed by the Land Development Code. The calculation in the site plan (project data) for the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) (3,114.27 square feet or 29.64 percent of the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) does not exceed the allowable maximum floor area ratio of .3 required by the Land Development Code. The proposed impervious coverage includes the building and the proposed impervious parking, driveways, and walkways surface area. The calculation provided for impervious coverage (7,606 square feet or 72.40 percent) does not exceed the 75 percent maximum impervious coverage allowed (7,878.94 square feet or 75 percent) by the Land Development Code. ELEVATIONS: The elevations have been submitted (Sheet Drawing A-2.1). The building height dimensions, building finishes and materials are noted on the elevations. A legend denotes proposed materials, building finishes, and exterior paint colors by Sherwin Williams. The exterior paint colors are reflected on the attached colored rendering of the front west fagade and the colors selected take into consideration the building's architectural design. The proposed one-story dentist office building consists of fifteen (15) parking spaces on site at three (3) feet, ten(10) inches below grade (elevation 0'-0") and three (3) feet, ten (10) inches above grade, a total of seven (7) feet, eight (8) inches from floor to ceiling. Pursuant to Section 20-2.3, Definitions, of the Land Development Code, Basement. Shall mean that portion of a building between the floor and ceiling, which has at least one-half of its height below grade, and the ceiling of which is not more than four(4) feet, six (6) inches above grade. 7615 SW 62 Avenue ERPB-07-078 presented on September 18, 2007 New Construction: Preliminary Page 3 of 4 Pursuant to Section 20-4.4(E)(8), Required parking Improvements, of the Land Development Code, Parking under buildings. Parking in structures forming a ground floor of a structure is prohibited in all RS, RT, RM, RO, and NR districts. Parking in structures forming a basement is prohibited in all RS and RT districts. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE: On September 11, 2007 (Tuesday), the Site Plan Review Committee met to review the proposed site plan. The Stormwater Ordinance was mentioned by the Planning and Zoning Department. The intent of the Ordinance is to require all properties to retain stormwater drainage on site as to prevent development that would result in contributing to or causing recurrent ponding on adjoining properties or public right-of-way." Code Enforcements' concerned with the proposed standing seam metal roof if applicable for the zoning district and if it would withstand Hurricane winds. Also noted by Public Works, was that the driveway entrance shall be a maximum of twenty-two feet in width. RECOMMENDATION: Preliminary Approval with the following conditions: 1. Consistent with the requirements set forth in Section 20-3.1, Land Development Code, entitled Zoning Use Districts and purposes; 2. Consistent with the requirements set forth in Section 20-3.3(D), Land Development Code, entitled Dimensional Requirements Nonresidential Districts; 3. Consistent with the requirements set forth in Section 20-3.5(G), Land Development Code, entitled Dimensional Requirements Nonresidential Districts; 4. Meet the requirements set forth in the adopted Stormwater Ordinance; 5. Submit the grading and irrigation plan prior to final ERPB approval; 6. Location map on site plan shall be consistent with zoning map; 7. Consistent with the requirements set forth in Section 20-4.4, Land Development Code, two way driveways — 22 feet; 8. Signage for the building is not a part of this application; and, 9. Any comments and/or suggestions from the Board. Attachments: • ERPB Application dated August 27, 2007 • Section 20-3.1 Zoning use districts and purposes • Section 20-3.3(D) Permitted Use Schedule • Section 20-3.5G Dimensional Requirements Nonresidential Districts • Stormwater Ordinance No. 06-07-1907 • Copies of the Building Department's permit record search • Land Master File Inquiry • Miami-Dade Property Information • Rendering: West Elevation • Photographs of subject and surrounding Properties • Plan of Survey, dated March 22, 2007 7615 SW 62 Avenue ERPB-07-078 presented on September 18, 2007 New Construction: Preliminary Page 4 of 4 Architectural Plans 24"' x 36" Sheet Title: • Site plan/Landscape plan, sheet A-1.1 • Basement Level, sheet A-1.2 • First Floor Plan, sheet A-1.3 • Elevations, sheet A-2.1 • Sections, sheet A-2.2 • Landscape plan, sheet L-1 LCH K:\ERPB\ERPB Agend'as\2007 ERPB AGENDAS\ERPB SEPTEMBER 18,2007\ERPB-07-078.doc - - CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING &ZONING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND PRESERVATION BOARD APPLICATION wpb-off-0�8 STREET ADDRESS OF JOB: I . (SCI• Cli � �/� SOUTH MIAMI,FL PROPERTY OWNER: ? �� I I` TEL.NO. �O 7� C � ADDRESS: °2A - 6j94, *- t✓113Q '. ( '-3 :314-3 STREET CITY STATE ZIP WHAT IS THE PRESENT USE OF THE PROPERTY? SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE BUSINESS OFFICE RETAIL STORE OTHER: APARTMENT OR TOWNHOUSE MEDICAL OFFICE AUTO REPAIR PLEASE,BRIEFLY SUMMARIZE THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED: 13E DaMC-3UiS F-V 0 0_ WHAT WILL THE TOTAL COST BE TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT? v-f ll�a2 '��( �2CN-t �" Z l k�•A q'C3 21—-3 APPLICANT'S NAME: P,l4 041 �U l l Ei4Z��--�. TEL NO. 1-41�G 16 1(o ADDRESS: i � 1 I LA u nEe DALE. 4--(, -32 STREET CITY STATE ZIP FAX NUMBER: AS THE APPLICANT,PLEASE,INDICATE YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO THIS PROJECT - - OWNER OF THE PROPERTY TENANT I LESSEE CONTRACTOR OTHER: OWNER OF THE BUSINESS ARCHITECT ENGINEER PLEASE,INDICATE CONTACT PERSON(ERPB's decision will be mailed to the contact person indicated below): PROPERTY OWNER r�UTj Grp 1.� I_.l a ,eP,-1 e APPLICANT -�t2T (.,nv�12�4C�1 � OTHER(provide name and address) 4 c - �c 4 PLEASE IGN YOUR NAME ON THE LINE ABOVE DATE ZONING REGULATIONS . 20-3.1 ARTICLE III. ZONING REGULATIONS 20-3.1 Zoning use districts and purposes. (A) Zoning Districts Established. In order to implement the intent of this Code and the city's adopted Comprehensive Plan;the City is hereby divided into twenty-nine(29)zoning use districts with the symbol designations and general purposes listed below and permitted uses set forth in Section 20-3.3(D)Standards shall be uniform throughout each zoning use district. District symbols and names shall be known as: Symbol Name RS-1 Estate Residential RS-2 Semi-Estate Residential RS-3 Low Density Single-Family RS-4 Single-Family RS-5 Single-Family(50' lots) RT-6 Townhouse Residential RT-9 Two-Family/'Ibwnhouse Residential RM-18 Low Density Multi-Family Residential C RM-24 Medium Density Multi-Family.Residential RO Residential Office LO Low-Intensity Office MO Medium-Intensity Office NR, Neighborhood Retail SR Specialty Retail GR General Retail TODD (MU-4) Transit-Oriented Development District (Mixed Use-4) TODD (MU-5) Transit-Oriented Development District (Mixed Use-5) TODD (LI-4) Transit-Oriented Development District (Light Industrial-4) TODD (PI) Transit-Oriented Development District (Pub- lic/Institutional) TODD (PR) Transit-Oriented Development District (Parks & Recreation) PUD-R Planned Unit Development-Residential PUD-M Planned Unit Development-Mixed Use PUD-H Planned Unit Development-Hospital HP-OV Historic Preservation Overlay HD-OV Hometown District Overlay CCS-OV Community Service Overlay H Hospital Supp. No. 10 21 ( ZONING REGULATIONS 20-3.1 transitional land use elements between single-family and more intensive multi-family residential or commercial areas. This district is appropriate in areas designated "Two-Family/Townhouse Residential" on the city's adopted Comprehensive Plan: (8) "RM-18"Low Density Multi-Family Residential District:The purpose of this district is to provide suitable sites for the development of low density multi-family residential uses with appropriate landscaped open space which are located in such a manner as to serve as an effective transitional land use element between less intensive residential uses and more intensive multi-family and/or commercial uses. This district is appro- priate in areas designated "Low Density Multi-Family Residential". on the city's adopted Comprehensive Plana (9) "RM-24" Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District: The purpose of this district is to provide suitable sites for the development of medium density multi-family residential uses with appropriate landscaped open space. This district is appropriate in areas designated"Medium Density Multi-Family Residential" on the city's adopted Comprehensive Plan. (10) "RO"Residential Office District:The purpose of this district is to provide suitable sites which will accommodate the limited office space needs of certain low impact profes- sional services in attractive low profile buildings on heavily landscaped sites, archi- tecturally similar to and compatible with nearby single-family structures.The district should serve as a transitional buffer between established single-family neighborhoods and major traffic arterials or more intensive uses, and is appropriate in areas designated "Residential Office" or "Low Intensity Office" on the city's adopted Comprehensive Plan. (11) "LO" Low-Intensity Office District: The purpose of this district is to permit low- intensity office development and redevelopment,without necessarily being compatible in appearance with single-family residential areas.This district is appropriate in areas designated "Low-Intensity Office" on the city's adopted Comprehensive Plan. (12) "MO"Medium-Intensity Office District: The purpose of this district is to accommodate professional and business office space needs in a relatively intensive centrally located manner.This district is appropriate in areas designated "Medium-Intensity Office"on the city's adopted Comprehensive Plan. (13) "NR" Neighborhood Retail District: The purpose of this district is to permit conve- nience commercial uses which provide for the everyday retail and personal service needs of nearby residential neighborhoods in a compatible and convenient manner. This district is appropriate in areas designated"Neighborhood Retail Development"on the city's adopted Comprehensive Plan. (14) "SR" Specialty Retail District: The purpose of this district is to maintain the basic specialty retail character of the Sunset Drive commercial area by encouraging comparison retail uses at the pedestrian-oriented grade level and office and residential Supp. No. 10 23 20-3.3 SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE l j "V -4 Cj e--1 C*3 1-1 r-i ri r, M'-i t a � a � I c �• OAAQ. C-I O A A. a co a � LO a aaaa cn a FhoAAa � a aalaa zn a C? O c� o c co a I�, alala cn� a ° . o A r--, cn co N Atn aOcn I tnCn0. cn q DZ � N � O cncncocoaaa coI v F � o � S) c', � cn aa. aaaaa cn ; m F, W TWA �; � '-I Coro aaalaaaa co cn x al o a) r� c� to a a a al a EI A A C/) c0 U) cn Ga ' . cn W�. 0 to 0. a cn CO co a aacnaz �; � ^l � acn s A z � a Z P" c bA D CnI'0IC,I oGI 4 U 'y (� bA c bA bG 4 C i U v SUO1). No. G 30 �— ZONING REGULATIONS 20-3.3 t4 CD 1 UOZA cv °,-° wx a a ax w -4 P, as a CO a � x L x r hOAAwx w a hoAAa+ x hoAC) pgv) a aaPL, vs H 64 C) hoAAN � � a PL, a a a M Ahogga -A a, aaa h o A A a a a a a v) h O g A Lo a a a a E., hOAA �Z) a, aa I a I a I I ca aa, aa cox aa. N cox C,) xaaa aaaavn co P4 a A fir: a a cn P oama aaaaco aaa NOacn a, a rn No aaa N xoaM a co xo aaa �. c� cv �ra (n a ►a x �, oo a cn a F+ of a � ti �0 a � cnt a r� co 1*4 a x C-0 C,� a w U xCo cq a 5 a w a) o U z O Cd � a a S-4 +i��i 0 (s7 cn m o h0 f if U bjD z 0 P-4 a CD tq � u oo � . b woo a a o w bn b ° o o �j m a) R. .�t� o o .� (� C/1 0 o R+ cn o cry Q v o r� v � b � Aw � x P., Supp. No. 9 30.1 20-3.3 SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE a � ti o A A a � AhoAA1 PL, a, wPz, a, PL, P, m a � aarr� wa � hoAA bto PL, rna, 4, P-4 P-1 P4 a wP.. a, a, HOAA � �rav� aw a a P4 P4 P4 P-1 114 N0 Py v� v� P4 PL4 v� P4 a cn aw a a aP4 a, a Pyw a, Z � a as o A, ca w a, P-1 P, a, P, w o a, a . a vn P4 a, P, P, w Py o P, P, m w PL, bD cd co o Pq ho U � U sO Cd C NO cd U r o in O H bo 0 rn R' O ,W ril d R' b9 + 4 v cd nd co rn W 104 rn C/] bo i+ R�y3 0 En 4S co U P-4 P4 P4 pq cd W bD k W t j °' b0 E, R. �". jai 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 'b b ho b N J V p4 � Pq Pq m Pq W M Pq I U I U I U U U U U Supp.No.9 30.2 ZONING REGULATIONS 20-3.3 0 0 0 0 0 o rn r-q� x Q hOAA � '� raaa0., aaaaaaaaaamaaaaa � hoAA bLo aamaaa aaaa, aaaaa aaa, aa, F, oAA � <raaa �aaaa aaaaaaaaa aaaaa 0 o x w m a a N � c4aav� aaa aaa.aaaaaaa aaa., aa, . Z P4 a a a a a a a 0P,, a, a, ca. v� aaa, aaaa a aaaaa N0pq aP- � co aaaar1; a a aaaaa xoa.a a a aaa a aaa 0 r. 0 h n 0 b cn aro CD w U o 45 Ea o O W 'Q x � 0AA - a '0 °�' Ewa 0 9 0 CWl1 a�i ' O M 4� cd o csS ai CD a> a a a a a Supp.No. 9 30.3 20-3.5 SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (, Section 20-3.5G DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS NONRESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS REQUIREMENT RO LO MO NR SR GR TODD Min. Lot Size Net Area(sq. ft.) 7,500 7,500 10,000 7_,500 5,000 10,000 5,000 Frontage (ft) 75 75 100 75 50° 100 50 Min. Setbacks (ft.) Front 25 20 15b 25 lob 20 20 Rear 20 15 10 15 10 15 a Side (Interior) 10 10 0 — — — Side (Street) 20 15 10 15 lob 15 15 Adj. Res. Dist. 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Side (w/driveway) 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Between Buildings 20 20 20 — — — — Max. Building Height Stories 2 2 4 2 4 2 2 Feet 25 30 50 25 50 30 30 Max. Building Coverage (°!o) 30 Max. Impervious Coverage 75 80 85 75 90 85 85 Max. Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.30 .70 1.60 .25 1.60 .80 .80 a 5' setback with wall opening adjacent to rear property line; no setback if no openings in wall. b Applies to ground floor only;columns are permitted within the setback.Columns shall not be greater than 24 inches in diameter;columns on the property line shall not be closer to each other than 10 feet. The frontage requirement does not apply to uses in the SR District. (Ord.No.2-90-1445, 1-2-90;Ord.No.2-92-1497, 1-7-92; Ord.No. 13-93-1541,§1,9-17-93;Ord. No. 23-94-1573,§ 1, 12-20-94; Ord.No.8-95-1581, §3,6-6-95;Ord.No. 1-96-1601,§ 1,1-16-96; Ord. No. 8-97-1629, § 1, 4-1-97; Ord. No. 17-03-1801A, § 1, 9-2-03) i, Supp.No.8 50.2 ' of s o u r� South Miami ti Afl-America My U � 1 INCORPORATES • CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI I �® 1927 R O 19 P LANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT STORMWATER ORDINANCE 2001 To: Applicants From: Julian H. Perez, Planning Director Date: September 10, 2007 Subject: City of South Miami Stormwater Ordinance # 06-07-1907 — Transmittal Notification In an effort to prevent development that would result in contributing to or causing recurrent ponding on adjoining properties or public rights-of-way, the City of South Miami has adopted the Stormwater Ordinance on March 6, 2007. Therefore, I hereby acknowledge that I am in receipt of the Stormwater Ordinance #06-07-1907. Agreed &Accepted Company Name Address of Development Print Name Date Julian H. Perez Date Planning Director ZAStormwater Ordinance Transmittals\Stormwater Ordinance Transmittal Letter.doc ORDINANCE NO. 06-07.-1907 A1N ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH AOAIM% FLORIDA, RELATING TO DRAINAGE; AMENDING SECTION 20-4.7 OF THE-CITY'S LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE IN ORDER TO CORRECT THE TITLE TO REFLECT "MIN1MUIVI STANDARDS" FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION AND NOT JUST IDENTIFYING MINIMUM HOUSING STANDARDS;MODIFYING SUBSECTION (C) IN ORDER TO SPECFFTCALLY REQUIRE ALL PROPERTIES TO RETAIN STORMwATER DRAINAGE ON SITE SO AS TO PREVENT DEVELOPMEINT 'THAT WOULD RESULT IN CONTRIBUTING TO OR CAUSING RECURRENT PONDING ON :ADJOINING PROPERTIES OR PUBLIC RIGHTS-0F.WAY; AND ELIMINATING SUBSECTION, ,(J) ENTITLED "CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY RELATING:TO REHABILITATION AREAS AS NO SUCH CERTIFICATE IS USED IN THE CITY, AND AS REHABILITATION AREA IS NOT DEFLNTD; .PROVIDING FOR SEVERABIL .l'Y, ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT,AND AN EFFEC`1TVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami desire to promote, protect and improve the health, safety and welfare of the residents and ' businesses of; and visitors to, the City of South .Miami by entrancing the minimmum• requirements of the Florida Building Code;and, WHEREAS,prior to the passage of the Florida Building Code,south Florida vvas governed by the South Florida Building Code, which code required individual property owners to maintain all Taut run-off on their property;and, f t WHEREAS, flooding is a.major issue in the state of Florida and specifically a j major issue for the general health, welfare and safety of the residents and businesses of South MiamL and, WHEREAS,pursuant to the powers vested in South Miami pursuant to chapters 163 and 166,Florida-Statutes, the City desires to enhance its minimum standards for all properties (commercial and residential), to require, individual property owners to # rnaintain stormwater drainage on their properties;and ; WHEREAS, at its January 16, 2007 meeting the Planning Board, after public .hearing, adopted a motion by a vote of 4 ayes and 2 trays (Ms. Yates, Ms. Beckman) recommending denial ofthe proposed amendments;and • i Additions shown by unrierI�ining and deMons shoovn by a st er Pap I of 4 i 3 Ord. No. 06-07-9907 W REAS,the Mayor and City Commission desire to amend Section 20-4.7, of the Land Devellopment Code to require greater enforcement of the City's stormwater drainage requirements,and to correct the title of Section 20-4.7 to correctly reflect that the chapter provides minimum standards for all construction, not just for residential h€rusing,send, WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission also seek to delete superfluous subsection(J)relstingito rehabilitation areas as no such areas exist in the city. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BV THE MAYOR AND C>t'rY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,FLORIDA: Section L I Section 20-4.7(C)(4)is amended to reacts as follows: 20-4.7 Minimum housla g standards. (C) Exterior Property Areas. (4) Stormwater .Drainage. Stornawater contributing or causing recurrent or exeessive ponding shall be eliminated through proper filling, elevating, drainage; or grading of the site. The ground shall he graded away from the building and foundation, but not so as to cause water to drain onto adjoining property ies or to recurrently drain on public rights-af--way. Pro er owners shall be r fired to maintain ad2guate swales French drains or other mechanisms to ensure that stormwater does not drain onto adjoining_oroperties or public tights-oof-waX In all new construction,fewmdeikw,or addWom any s%gnilieant addition that results in changes to the elevation of the site that would result in runoff to adiacent properties or the right-of way made after Mareh 6, 20 failure to q=p11 with this subsection shalt result in the denial of a certificate of occupancy or certificate of use until such time as sufficient proof ur-ovided,to the CiM Bu ildj Planning and Public Works I3e artments that the devcl Vment shall retain stormwater on Site or that adequate drainage is o—Aded so as to regent the develo ment from cMtributin or causin p- recurrent ponding to adjoining operrty(icsa or public rig is-af way. (J) G"fleate of Oeeupanray. (,n Reserved Additions shown by underlining and deletions shown bye Page 2 of 4 Ord. No. 06-07-9907 (3) area dud! ecupangy-:. , GM issided-or a v;.iWing used-:zr hol to the 11 4' (4f tt. a 7 F tb 1fi £aliiyI Section 2. If any section,clause,sentence,or phrase Df this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, the holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. -Section 3. All ordinance's or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are repealed Section 44. This ordinance shall be codified and included in the Lund .Development Code. Section 5. This ordinance shrill take effect immediately upon enactment. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 2007. X.171" ST: APPROVED: Cl ERK MAY-OR I'Reading-- 2/20/ 2'd Reading— 316/07 Additions shown by undMinin and deletions shown by owFst4iPe. r Ord. No. 06-07-1907 (4) COMMISSION VOTE: 5-0 READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mayor Feliu: Yea Vice.Mayor Wiscombe: yea Commissioner Birts: Yea Luis Figueredo, Commissioner Palmer: Yea. Na i Gallop Figmedo,P.A. Commissioner Beckman: yea Office of City Attomey P.\CommItems12007\12-6-07US-07-001 LDC Amend 20-4_7 Storniwater Ord.doc Additions shown.by oftlidu and deletions shown by ovmt 4 g. BP208I01 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI - BD 9/11/07 Global Location Inquiry - Building Permit Applications 09: 48 : 15 Property address 7615 SW 62 AVENUE FOLIO NUMBER 09-4036-027-0210 Type options, press Enter. 2=Application inq 3=Structure inq 4=Permit inq 5=Inspection inq Opt Appl Nbr Type Stat Date Tenant Nbr/Name F3=Exit F12=Cancel BP100IOI CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI - BD 9/11/07 Land Master File Inquiry 09: 47 : 45 FOLIO NUMBER 09-4036-027-0210 ALTERNATE ID NUMBER Location ID nbr 456 Street address 7615 SW 62 AVENUE SOUTH MIAMI FL 33143 Subdivision . . . . . LARKINS PINES MAP OF Current owner . . . . BENJAMIN CINDY Person/Company P 7615 SW 62 AVE Phone SOUTH MIAMI FL 33143 Plat/Book/Page Zoning . . . . . . . NA *ERROR* Variance . . . . . . Fire zone . More. . . Press Enter to continue. F3=Exit 'F4=Appl inq F10=Legal desc F12=Cancel F13=Disp .sections F15=Valuations F17=User defined V i LOCATION MAP Scale: 1"=120' PLAN O F S U R V E Y - s -�► -A� - - - -I— i Ill��gp�lllt,,,,l�i�i�lllllll Scale 1"= 20' 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00' 62.48' I VIII IIIIII III Ill +N- -�6 -- - -q- 26 t VIII VIII ' s o s s o o � ''llnl�llullluluml,• 6 5 4 3�d 2 1 2s. '.•.•.•.•.•.•.•...•........'..'.'.'.' J 3 a ' .......................^j........... j ...:....... 18 19 21 22 23 24 .. ...' ...•:.•.•.'.'.•.-:• 06 ....................... 2 .00' I (North 1/2 Lot 2, Block 16) ' .� I Z)::'::'::'::':':':':':':':':':':::':'::':::.'...'........ J wood Found Conc.Curb LEGAL DESCRIPTION t ,;, Poles I.P 5/8" 140.07 a. ' 0.55 pole -14 :. .'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.::.......... ...V y...... -- (no id) 0.31'c 3'C.B.S Wall 3'C.B.S Wall Curb OO F• - - F nit m The South 2 of Lot 2 and all Lot 3, Block 3, MAP OF LARKINS PINES, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 24, at Page 20 of the.Public Record of Miami-Dade County,Florida. 99.b'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'..'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.".'.'.'.'.' 24.9,........ P 5/8„ ....... .......................... .. o,....'.....'.'.':.....'.'.'::...... ............. ......................_ o Cl) ,�0;•.'.'.'.'.'.':.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.':.'.'.'.'.'tn......N.......Payemi. .'.'.'.'.'.'..'.'.'.'.'.'...N ............................. pirh .. (n0 Id) N I'.'.':.':.'. '.' ...................... ...a........ ... °fl r ............... ....... O'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'::.' �..'.'.'.'.'.' O ..................... Property Address. 7615 S.W. 62nd Avenue-Miami Florida 33143 :...'.. ,..............I.'...'..'.'..:::.............. . ..........................._. .........":::.'....."..:: :.:.'.:..' ' '.. ."::.........' :':::':::'::':'::::':::::.::'::::::::::::::'::::':':'::::...':..:::: Ep Y o.....Pavement......... ti........................................... Overhead :.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.':' l,. :19.9'.Grass 4.4' Q. ao . .. ".'. ...'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.':.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'. Electric Wire rr tt : O':.'::::::::'::':'::"::::::::':':::'.'.'.'::::'::':'::'. ::':':.....':':":":':::.:..••:.. 39.52' Flood Zone. X Community Panel No: 120658-0276 ; ` ;: >.............. ................•.•.'.L..'..'.". .'.:.':........'.•.".':.-:' s.5' B v............................. Base FI I :'.'..a ...............:.........'.......'.......". .'" Garage € Flood E Elevation: N/A Map Revised: March 2, 1994. I...... ......... . ,. .............................................. .'.-.•.-.-::.'.'.-.'...)....•.•.".".'.'.'.'.-.'.'.•.•.•.'........ Grass 12.2'7.9' ^y c. Elev.14.48' o :U C_j ...........CV ........... ...... iv'. .. ..tic. : ---•:-• -- South Property Line of Lot 2 ------ -- O ........... .' --P-------------- -------- --.- ---------.- 3.9` teps FOR THE BENEFIT OF: �,• 4.01' ' •.".'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'............... vi Grass 4.5' V Chain Link Fence 4'Hi hJ Wood Fence "J.''.'.'.' ml ..• o a 5.3'. (6'High) MARIANI PROPERTIES, LLC., A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY <+C - na.:.:. b�.:.': I Ni' Co.. : <v ' .1�•..... a 0: 9 p, RICHARD C. MARIANI, JR. AND KIMBER L. MARIANI, HUSBAND AND WIFE o lei �_ ° 2,07' 2. ' y5 9.6 r:. ) 0 L ... �. / U - - .,..fin• 4 PRIVATE GIBRALTAR BANK&TRUST COMPANY ITS E N W s - SUCC SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS _ o s O Pa o DON R. LIVINGSTONE, ESQUIRE 3. :.':'::::::':: :::::"::'::'::: d , .7 S m, �l 26.00' 1-oTORY-C.B.S. 1 ; M ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE FUND INC. a: Y I g 64' Residence No.761.5 0 _ o 0 0 F v in 1 4 e V M a 4 _ 1 .93' F.F Elev. ••�:: N R N O ?4' 1.42' o.....'.':.':.....'. co I�IiIIIIIIIIIIII��I�II�I�IIIIIIIIIIIIII�II �o PRA-SJR. & ASSOC>A-MS, �C. .......... IQ .I. .......................... a I Y co Parking Area.':.'::.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.':. N II SURVEYORS - MAPPERS - F�L_AIVNEI2S "� Ste ..... s 3.• ? o 52 W 81st AVENUE,MIAMI,FLORIDA 33144 J N r I I .� II 2 5 �I _ -a0.. Voice 305 1-60 9 .' `�i�<•.: °. ' • 55 00-Fak 305 221 123 VIII C ) Ch — 25.93' 9.70' E-mall:mprats�bellsouth.net Certificate of Authorization No.:4249 I :�' 24.6' a c° 10.8' aln Lmk Fame( HIgnJ. rn. b u; a Q :.:moo::::: I 1 o N 7 0'cl ::I::: fk A C " u' ABBREVIATIONS P, °O r� 40' �i '. . The above'BOUNDARY SURVEY',represent the herein described property and ti was completed under my supervision \ ^j F.lev.12A2' ..�.. and a dire ction,to the best of my knowledge and belief and It also meets the Minimun Technical Standard set fain by _ •..............................I 1b Water l 9 . 41 LArc P.i.=POinr orT .............................. angency :d .. ,�..... � the Florida Board Adminishative Code. S.M.. =sexn Mark P.0.e=Point of eeghinp :- ' •• '• - '''•'''''•' •' Mete _ ?�• ---------------- SURVEYOR'S NOTES: CaI-.=Calculated P.C.=Point or curvature - _ ------ - --= �� if 1)The above captioned Property was surveyed and described based on the above Legal Description furnished by CA=Centerline PRC=Point or Re eve curvahue Water i Found Found . C.B.S.=tort steak d -Structure RGE.=Res 0.79'c 140.07' — 1.34'c I P 1/2" Client. nge q..'_ Z ,�� Meter II.P 5/8" (no id) 2)This Certification Is only for the lands as described,it is not as ceri ficatfon of Title,zoning,Easements,or Freedon of E=East R/W=Rlghtor-way ....... I i(no id) Chain Link Fence , MA=Monument line SEC.=Section Encumbrances,ABSTRACT NOT REM WED. N-Norm swk=Wewasc _ >. 3)There may be additional Restrictions not drown on this survey that may be found In the Public Records of this P.C.P.=Permanent Control Point S.=soot r,,,.•"'°` :+.,- O =i (Lot 4, Block 3) (4'High) County.Examination of ABSTRACT OF TITLE vAI hove to be made to determine recorded Instruments,if any affecting P.R.M.=Pemgnent Reference Mon-1 T=Tangent 3 th15 W.=Wean T P=Township 1 I - � '�• C.O.=Chat Link Fences Encr.=Encreochnent yang A+L Is 11 f i 1 4)Ownership subject to OPINION OF TITLE. ""'-w, z��. \ ' W.i.=Wood Fence F.F. Ffn6n Fkwr r' I$'A� ,o •.•.1'..•.'.•.'..•.'.'.'. 5)Type of Survey:BOUNDARY SURVEY. - ,. y Elev.=Ekwibn :A/C=Ak Condllloner a ,E...:' .ate 6)Loeatlon and Identification of UfiONes and or adjacent to the property were not secured as such Infortnatlon was ,.- - - r" -r -- - '?° ,� ' not requested. -.,t v V I : 7)Unless otherwise noted.this Flrm has not attempted to locate Footings and/or Foundations(undergrounc0. -MO3 / ,8)This PL AN OF SURVEY,has been re ared for the exclusive use of the entities named hereon.The Certlflcate does C.A.D.File r _ .,,�r• A P P � L -/- ................... CA.D.File: not extend to any unnamed party. r� •� '''" ''''9)if Bearings shown they are based on: `a T:Surveys/22867 50'TOTAL RNV T:Surveys/22867 ELEVATIONS NOTES: (IF REQUESTED AND SHOWN) + Original date: r { ' #o °' Orginal date: 1)0.0'Indleates existing Elevations . � �IO PRATS JR. & ASSOCIATES, INC. 03-22-07 2)Elevations are referred to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum. Feet (N.G.V.D.) 4 � 03-22-07 3)BENCHMARK(Used)B.M.No. 5269-8 Elevation: 015' Feet (C.O.MJ � tFOruperneaaeeREVetorut '•� �" - ` SURVEYORS -MAPPERS-PLANNERS FieUp-d t.: (For Up-0ates sea REV6K)NS) Field date:Location: USHWY#IANDS.W.62ndAVENUE � )r t Mar ..� REVISIONS 03-22-07 r 3>e Profession Survey rand Ma er Nti.3332 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 52 SW 81st AVENUE,MIAMI,FLORIDA 33144 03-22-07 J.N.: Date: THIS NOTA VALID CERTIFICATION . _ <-?w ate Of Florid .a �+ Voice(305)551-6000-Fax(305)221-1239 WITHOUT THE SURVEYOR'S ORIGINAL , a Pra s Jr o Original J.N.: . .,, J.N.: Date: ' I p �"`- '-` Certificate of Authorization No.:4249 Original J.N.: • IIII SIGNATURE AND RAISED EMBOSSED Professional S o `1� • 8r1VOi333 22867 THISNOTAVALIDCERTIFICA 1I 4,%-�� 22867 J.N.: Date: SEAL PRESENT. \tik. Q . i" `� h w ! / ,,, 3° WITHOUT THE SURVEYORS tiC3RIGINAL I SIGNATURE AND RAISED EMBOSSED SEAL PRESENT. _ �.a arAa4f8t61SA�° I PLAN OF SURVEY IIIIIII IIIII III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II it MARIO PRATS JR. & ASSOCIATES, INC. LOCATION MAP I IIIIIII III SURVEYORS-MAPPERS-PLANNERS Scale: V=20' I Scale: 1"= 120' IIII 52 S.W.81st Avenue,Miami,Florida 33144 Voice(305)551-6000-Fax(305)221-1239 Certificate of Authorization No.:4249 -- = IIIII�III,,I,r,,III�III I I M _= - -S,W- mac -AVEPJ - - d- IIIIII IIIIII co N 50.00' 50.00' 50.ar 50,00 62.48' {{�I}}I (I II --( ulnd—S-W 76{F} �TI FEt1 — 25'UJ I(I I I I( I �—°T LLLww(LLJJJ - � '�Inlllllllllllllllul"• I 6 5 0 4 3�Q 2 Q 1 MAP OF LARKINS PINES 3 (P.B. 24- PG. 20) w 25.ar (North 1/2 Lot 2, Block 3) ( o Iii:':':':::':::':: CI I ...�.. :::::::::: w m::.:.:...................... 3.I L• ...... o6 O C/J CSI::':':':'::': ::':':'::':.. :':. ......:::':'::': v>. 18 19 21 22 23 24 cz*..:::'::::'::':'::':':':::::::::'::':':':':':I::':::'::':'::::': in. (� Q':: :':'::'::'::::':':•:':':':::'::::::::::.: '25' I LL Z_ p co U::i:::::':::':::r::':::'::':::':':'::'::'::'::':::':'::i::':' Found I n N .................... ...... .. .... Conc.Curb , LEGAL DESCRIPTION :':::::.:.':.':.':.'.':.'::.....:..... Waad I.P 5Id) C/1) U e. ':.':.......1'.:•cL0 Poles ' (no Id) Wood "" 0.31'c 140.07 4. 0.55'c Pole Curb Y �- • FOUn �� 3'C.B.S Wall 3'C.B.S Wall C Nail::. .':_ :---w --- Found g C14 N The South Y2 of Lot 2 and all Lot 3, Block 3, MAP OF LARKINS PINES, according to the plat thereof, oo. �mJ . o P a• as recorded in Plat Book 24, at Page 20 of the Public Record of Miami-Dade Coun ,Florida. o, �@ g ty :..:::::::::::::.. oo !? �� ry0 (no Id) O a .. c::.:::::.':::::. .. . .'. 4). ::::.':.•::::::.':•:::.':::::::::.'.:':::: /, Overhead L Overhead Q Property Address: 7615 S.W. 62nd Avenue - Miami, Florida 33143 :. E.:.::..:..:.:.::. .: :.....:.:.::::. .;;.w::::: :: Electric wire Flood Zone: "X " Community Panel No: 120658-0276 0::::::::::::::: �. Base Flood Elevation: N/A Map Revised: March 2, 1994. �,:::::: :::::::: :::......':::::N':'::':':'::'::':':':::': :':':•:•::::'::'::..':.. ....... South Propp�Line of Lot 2,Block 3 FOR THE BENEFIT OF: .. Fier MARIANI PROPERTIES, LLC., A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY RICHARD C. MARIANI, JR. AND KIMBER L. MARIANI, HUSBAND AND WIFE UJ GIBRALTAR PRIVATE BANK & TRUST COMPANY' ITS SUCCESSORS AND OR ASSIGNS �. �w G A' c / t ° 1° 2A a o Z O co DON R. LIVINGSTONE, ESQUIRE a3i" ° ti `�' v ATTORNEYS' TITLE INSURANCE FUND, INC. C: z O o -..(� : Wood Fence LL m a (g High) C I w NIN CN III IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII II MARIO PRATS jp,. & Assac Aams, INC. I Y. L.L. �; o 0 —I III SURVEYOf2S — MAPPERS — PLANNERS '' •'+ ::'.'::::i:'::::'rr:'..::::::::::::. (D O pv IIII (IIII 52 SW 81 at AVENUE,MIAMI,FLORIDA 33144 Volce(305)551-6000-Fax(305)221-1239 ' Q t :' w E IIIII .......... E-mail: mprots0bellsouth.net Certificate of Authorization No.:4249 I•••••::- !Fled moo. .79 cl • a 0 b' .5 The above'BOUNDARY SURVEY',represent the herein described property and It was completed under my supervision ABBREVIATIONS � rL1�•;•::� Water and or direction,to the best of my knowledge and belief and It also meets the Mlnimun Technical Standard set forth by L-Arc P.T.-Point of Tangency "�"" Meter the Florida Board Administrative Code. B.M.=Benan Mork P.o.B=Point of eegimng ;:•;' ?.... - ---- --- SURVEYOR'SNOTES: Caic.=cWMICted P.C.=PoinIofcurvature Water Found Found 1)The above captioned Property was surveyed and described based on the above Legal Description furnished by c/L=centemne PRC=Point or Reverse curvature - 4 I 0.79'c 7.34'c� I P 1/2" Client. C.B.S.=Concrete-Block-Structure RGE.=Range Meter E=Eost R/W=Rightof-WaY 25 i. 5�8" 140.07 I 2)This Certification Is only or the lands as described,It Is not as certification of Title,Zoning,Easements,or Freedon of (n0 Id) Chain Link Fence I (n0 id) Y 9• M-North Monument sec.=Sedan (4'High) Encumbrances.ABSTRACT NOT REVIWED, N=North svk=sidewalk �� t F r r v e ..I.... ... :: .. O i I 3)There may be additional Restrictions not shown on this survey that may be found In the Public Records of this P.C.P.-Permanent Control Point S.=South P.�; 3 I County.Examination of ABSTRACT OF TITLE will have to be made to determine recorded Instruments.If any affecting P.R.M.=Permanent Reference Monument T=Torgenr $ a LU . y W.=West TW P=Towruhlp '^.Z,,.� ,7 this property. `.. ' 3 C.L.F.=Chain Link fence Encr.=Encroachment ��y 1�, 4 Ownership subject to OPINION OF TITLE. w 0-- ) P p j W.F.=WOOtlFence � .�• :�:��::':I:.: ::� ��:•:�:. MA OF LARKINS PINES 5)Type of Survey:BOUNDARY SURVEY. AIC Finish Faor - r•' ,.,. .............. Elev.=Elevaian A/C.Air Condllbner �'^.l �•.1' 6)Location and Identification of Utilities and or adjacent to the property were not secured as such Information was - 4 'I•''•• '• '+ (P,B. 24- PG. 20) not requested. y'r�Y,r r..,�,.a'��+ • co 7)Unless otherwise noted,this Firm has not attempted to locate Footings and/or Foundations(underground). r :w �s�. (Lot 4, Block 3) f i g _ C.A.D.File: 8)This PLAN OF SURVEY,has been prepared for the exclusive use of the entitles named hereon.The Certificate does C.A.D.File: , 'a � l 2 - not extend to any unnamed party. '' `Q", �lrr �a T:Surveys/22867 _ F, 50'TOTAL F:/VV T:Surveys/22867 9)If Bearings shown they are based on: .\ , - r ^x Original date: ELEVATIONS NOTES: (IF REQUESTED AND SHOWN) • "{,• Original date: 'fir _V _ ` m 1)0.0'Indicates existing Elevations w` 03-22-07 ' '..' 03-22-07 2)Elevations are referred to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum. Feet (N.G.V.D.) - - 5269-R 9.15' , ) (Fo(upaates see REVISIONS) 3)BENCHMARK(Used)B.M.No. Elevation: Feet (co.m.) - (For Up-dares se_e REVISIONS) ar " ��'.y'✓ Field date: Field.date: '-Ma `r. J Location: US HWV f 1 AND S.W.62nd AVENUE :, t y ypp - 03-22-07 REVISIONS: +rCS ,.,... � -''�`" Professional rye or rid' �r No.3332 03 22 07 teo lo'-a J.N.: 24346 Date: 04-17-08 F. THIS NOT A VALID CERTIFICATION •'+�' - -^ �t Original J.N.: WITHOUT THE SURVEYOR'S ORIGINAL iP rr ti w Original J.N.: I I J.N.: Date: SIGNATURE AND RAISED EMBOSSED Pr06,S bi,gurvfiyor na. _pp NO':3332d O,C I THIS NOT.A VALID CERTIFICATION 22867 SEAL PRESENT. 22867 WITHOUT THE SURVEYOR'S ORIGINAL J.N.: Date: v State„O IOrI a ti y SIGNATURE AND RAISED EMBOSSED v 1 tlda+d r r i J �.,;r`T 1'`S SEAL PRESENT. S N a. i y r i n . . r Id FK \II1II�' 4 ? t� ELEV 34'-10' ALUMINUM GRILLE Da ELEV. 31'-3' a BLDG. WT, _ELEV_ 16'-ro' - - - - HER - EAM - --- ___ ___ _ - - _--- --OF 8 ---- --— :__:�•--- - --- - -_•• -- - TOP _ Z. _ : FIN.FIRST FLOOR ELEV. 8'-6' O EXIST.GRADE ELEV. 0'-0' SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE- 1!8' I'-0' LEGEND • ALUMINUM RAILING PAINTED AS PER SW '?006 • w aSTANDING SEAM MTL ROOF PREWEATHERED GALVALUME HARDY BOARD 51DING PAINTED_ • AS PER SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 6100 (DagbrealJ 141 KEYSTONE VENEER a_ .. FASCIA FINISH PAINTED .WHITE �+ M AS PER SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 1006 e - Pol 6' FINISH STUCCO BAND PAINTED WHITE W AS PER SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 1006 (Ln a8' FINISH STUCCO 'BAND PAINTED WHITE AS PER SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 1006 E-+ ~ z IN TOP OF ROOF W/DECORATIVE ALUM. GRILLE ON TOP PAINTED A S PER SW 1006 SHEET TITLE . X Fel STUCCO FINISH WALL PAINTED WHITE t 4 ilk} AS PER SW 1006 ELEVATIONS 10 PRECAST LINTEL CORBELS KEYSTONE FINISH. SCALE: „ T ° DATE: y, s 08/31/07 SHEET t ,r - 1 ;: '.... v ;. OF MARIANI u. _tt+ i - t f j Fal { --- -- - - - - - - - - ELEV. 34�10- - . - - - - - TOP OF DECORATIVE D a Qa ALUMINUM GRILLE TOP OF ROOF -_ -- -- -- -- -- -- - - -- -- -. - - ELEV: 31'-3' 9 .. 3 BLDG. WT. - -_ _- T_ -,CAS•PER GORE) __ -- - -- -- --- - -- ELEV. 23'-1011/2' S .._.. .... : ._ - __ - -- -- --ELEV: 6 -6 l TOP OF BE:::: _::__::: " . _ . . _ _ - -- - _..._... _...._.... - ... ......::::.: i4 O - - a_- - - 1 _ - w • T CD FIN.FIRST FLOOR I _ _ ELEV. S ro T - -' - _ . : ........ -- Ul - .._............---....._•---' , - _._.....- - - _-- _ °-: _ _ _- - _ _ - O O - _ EXIST. G E - - - - X RAP Y. - 10 9 1 a WEST ELEVATION SCALE= i/V I'-0' Ilk GUTIERREZ & LOZANO 8 ARCHITECTS 2 2830 W. STATE ROAD 84, SUITE117 FT_ LAUDERDALE, FL. 33312 -- — — —_ — — ELEV. 34'-10' PHONE: (954) 321 -3442 70P OF:IDECOR,4TIl/E. FAX: (954) 321 —3864 I 0 I>x< ALUMINUM GRILLE -- — — — — - - — - - — — — — — — — — - TOl?OF_1?OOF_ ELEY. 31'=3' REVISIONS BLDG. HT. CA3-f?ER CODE) — _.._... ELEV. 16 6 TOP OF BEAM ' m MANUEL GUTIERREZ ❑ _z ' STATE OF FLA. REG. No. 8253 FI LOO ; _ — :_ ._�-�:_ - :____:: �-'.:••�...•.,-: V $'-6' R _- O = - = _ = ___ - - - - -- - -- - -- - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - O - -- - p- - - E. . - - EXIST:CsRADI= .� CARLOS LOZANO ❑ STATE OF FLA. REG. No. 0014722 EAST ELEVATION _ _ � - - -. , _ ..:�*ijy:-:,yu__�ar� _ k'...:. '1"<'-"-.L}b..r� ,i .��_� �. �. r+..nr-ti.... .,.e--.�: .�.^`•?•ct�. .Sub.•�y* _,w y- ELEV. 34'-10' Tc TOP OF DECORATIVE a#: DD O ALUMINUM GRILLE All a D a TOP OF 8001=. `� r ELEV. 31'-3' F BLDG. NT. " (AS PER CODE) t - ELEV. 23'-101iz'_ bY �.. 3 FM ELEV. 16'-6' _.....:. .: ......... .......... ..._.........._..........- - ._ .._.._..... TOP '- .....-' _... ........: _._. .._. -- - - BEAM - - •-- '----- ------'- ------' ---'- ---'- ...._. 5r4 s 3�r - M - - - - ---- — ___—_ ------- -- — w',+,VRy.G -'' y.��iw.-w;n�--" "t-' *Ma i> K y,, W.'.w �it..ta'. l4 'N•{`,`�' d J ® -- --- -.- -- - _— ------ -----�: - go I - --- — FIN FIRST FLOOR ,VA a a! sEV 5-6 zUi r .r _....--_-"..-.-__...-..-_.._..__..__-_....___._......._....__.._...._.__.........__. __—_.__. ....._..__.....__..-_._.._....._...._......—..._.._._._...... . .—...._-- ._.._...._............. ....._.-_.-: ._...._.._ -.-...- ..... v Y'`-_ .rst•'f'�w,.•n.,nw•' EXIST.GRADE - - - - --- 5 'xf .,1 ,µ:taY^,�•t xsas�,�,a�-�sr�c�a)}y;x (h fy NORTH ELEVATION- SCALE: 1/8' r � ,• •r �-s ;3 � AN.." p . f . f'� _ ir.i•.� 3j P 1. •rt' Miami-Dade My Home Page 1 of 2 1 My Home IV Show Me: Property Information ) Search By: Select Item r .4t Text only \�� -. -, Property Appraiser Tax Estimator 1a; a Sy�t 78TH 5 �y u: Summary Details: -- Folio No.: 09-4036-027-0210 Pro e 7615 SW 62 AVE � F Mailing MARIANI PROPERTIES LC 'Ji" r < Address: , 7741 SW 62 AVE SOUTH MIAMI FL a` - 33143- -� Property Information: a =. Primary 800 OFFICE CLUC: 0013 OFFICE BUILDING Beds/Baths: 0/0 Floors: 1 Living Units: 0 d1 Sq 064 Footage: t 5W Will S7 Lot Size: 10,500 SQ FT SR R Year Built: 1948 MAP OF LARKINS PINES PB Legal 4-20 S1/2 LOT 2&ALL LOT Digital Orthophotography-2006 0 115 ft Description: 3 BLK 3 LOT SIZE 75.000 X 140 OR 10831-1151 0880 1 COC 25559-3129 04 2007 1 % We appreciate your feedback,please take a minute to complete our survey. Sale Information: Sale O/R: 5559-3129 Sale Date: /2007 My Home I Property Information I Proper Taxes Sale Amount: 1$1,150,000 1 My Neighborhood I Property Appraiser Assessment Information: Home I Using Our Site I About I Phone Directory I Privacy I Disclaimer Year: 2007 2006 Land Value: $630,000 $577,500 Building Value: $114,276 $112,397 Market Value: $744,276 $689,897 Assessed Value: $744,276 $689,897 If you experience technical difficulties with the Property Information application, please click here to let us know. -Total Exem tions: $0 $0 [Taxable Value: 1 $744,276 $689,897 E-mail your comments,questions and suggestions to Webmaster Web Site ©2002 Miami-Dade County. All rights reserved. http://gisims2.miamidade.gov/myhome/propmap.asp 9/11/2007 Miami-Dade My Home Page 1 of 2 i My Home x _ - N Show Me: Property Information Search By: Select Item 0 Text only ��y' Property Appraiser Tax Estimator SW 7 ST Summary Details: 'F 1 ,r, mr Folio No.: 09-4036-027-0200 Property: 150 SW 76 ST Mailing 76 STREET CORP Address: 150 SW 76 ST MIAMI FL 33143- 'h Property Information: ;:y- v Primary 800 OFFICE - �,�._.0 �: y .° y�. ffik CLUC: 0013 OFFICE BUILDING Beds/Baths: 0/0 ` : . Floors: 2 Living Units: 0 u " di Sq 5,463 Footage: Lot Size: 112,247 SQ FT J t)R - SW 78T gRpW H 5T Year Built: 1990 ti MAP OF LARKINS PINES PB Legal 4-20 LOT 1 &N1/2 LOT 2 Description: BILK 3 LOT SIZE 87.480 X Digital Orthophotography-2006 0 115 ft 140 OR 17428-2443 1196 2 2 Sale Information: We appreciate your feedback,please take a minute to complete our survey. Sale O/R: 17428-2443 Sale Date: 11/1996 Sale Amount: 1$1,250,000 My Home I Property nformation I Property Taxes Assessment Information: I My Neighborhood I Property Appraiser Year: 2007 2006 Home I Using Our Site I About I Phone Directory I Privacy I Disclaimer Land Value: $734,820 $673,585 Building Value: $530,840 $520,938 Market Value: $1,265,660$1,194,523 Assessed Value: $1,265,660$1,194,523 If you experience technical difficulties with the Property Information application, Total Exemptions: $0 $0 please click here to let us know. [Taxable Value: 1$1,265,6601$1,194,523 E-mail your comments,questions and suggestions to Webmaster Web Site ©2002 Miami-Dade County. All rights reserved. http://gisims2.miamidade.gov/myhome/propmap.asp 9/11/2007 Miami-Dade My Home Page 1 of 2 My Home IV Show Me: Property Information r' ' Search By: Select Item � I 0 Text only .`4��'r�•, _ Property Appraiser Tax Estimator - 3LY 76TH S7•��,. Summary Details ' ` Folio No.: 9-4036-028-0070 r = Property: 7575 SW 62 AVE •' . a ; . I Mailing DOUBLE M ENTERPRISES c Address: INC 5825 SW 131 TERR MIAMI FL - 33156-7263 'tip g Property Information: * Primary 800 OFFICE one: CLUC: 0013 OFFICE BUILDING Beds/Baths: 0/0 Floors: 1 Living Units: 0 �• d1 Sq 163 BROWN OR SW 78TH 8T Footage: F, Lot Size: 19,450 SQ FT Year Built: 11957 LARKIN PINES REV PB 53- Digital Orthophotography-2006 0 115 ft Legal 1 S25FT OF LOT 27&ALL Description: LOT 28 BILK 2 LOT SIZE 75.000 X 126 OR 16721- 1713-1714 0395 1 'bf' We appreciate your feedback,please take a minute to complete our survey. Sale Information: Sale O/R: 16721-1713 My Home I Property Information I Property Taxes Sale Date: 3/1995 1 My Neighborhood I Property Appraiser Sale Amount: 1$435,000 Assessment Information: Home I Using Our Site I About I Phone Directory I Privacy I Disclaimer Year: 2007 2006 Land Value: $567,000 $519,750 Building Value: $233,929 $229,405 Market Value: $800,929 $749,155 If you experience technical difficulties with the Property Information application, Assessed Value: $800,929 $749,155 please click here to let us know. otal Exemptions: $0 $0 axable Value: 1 $800,929 $749,155 E-mail your comments,questions and suggestions to Webmaster Web Site ©2002 Miami-Dade County. All rights reserved. http://gisims2.miamidade.gov/myhome/propmap.asp 9/11/2007 Miami-Dade My Home Page 1 of 2 My Home r� _ N Show Me: Property Information Search By: —°• �' Select Item 0 Text only O 5�"r . Property Appraiser Tax Estimator ,,,,.SW 7STH 5T Summary Details: Folio No.: 9-4036-027-0220 - ~� Property: 7633 SW 62 AVE r Mailing ROTHMAR CORPORATION �,� ^" q c Address: " , 7633 SW 62 AVE MIAMI FL cn 33143-4906 - m 't Property Information: ' Primary o 800 OFFICE ne: 'S • Joe e CLUC: 0013 OFFICE BUILDING �,. Beds/Baths: 0/0 f 3(±;' 4 Floors: A Living Units: 0 d1 Sq 3,979 Footage: Lot Size: 114,000 SQ FT BR41NN OR, 78TH ST Year Built: 1998 MAP OF LARKINS PINES PB Legal 4-20 LOTS 4&5 BLK 3 LOT Description: SIZE 100.000 X 140 OR Digital Orthophotography-2006 0 115 ft 17923-4526 1297 1 Sale Information: Sale O/R: 17923-4526 We appreciate your feedback,please take a minute to complete our survey. Sale Date: 12/1997 Sale Amount: 1$215,000 MI Assessment Information: Home I Property Information I Property Taxes I My Neighborhood I Property Appraiser Year: 2007 2006 Land Value: $840,000 $770,000 Home I Using Our Site I About I Phone Directory I Privacy I Disclaimer Building Value: $359,908 $353,431 Market Value: $1,199,908$1,123,431 Assessed Value: $1,199,908$1,123,431 Total Exem tions: $0 $0 If you experience technical difficulties with the Property Information application, [Taxable Value: [$1,199,9081 please click here to let us know. E-mail your comments,questions and suggestions to Webmaster Web Site ©2002 Miami-Dade County. All rights reserved. http://gisims2.miamidade.gov/myhome/propmap.asp 9/11/2007 Miami-Dade My Home Page 1 of 2 e My Home Show Me: Property Information - Search By: Select Item Text only $ � y u Property Appraiser Tax Estimator Stiv 7sT4 STS Summary Details: f•'' P Folio No.: 9-4036-027-0330 Property: 7616 SW 61 AVE + "- i , e D Mailing MARYNDALE < Address: CORPORATION OF FLORIDA y r 950 SW 72 AVE MIAMI FL = � 33155-5533 § Property Information: Primary 0800 SINGLE FAMILY m Zone: RESIDENCE 0001 RESIDENTIAL-SINGLE ` ,. CLUC: FAMILY Beds/Baths: 3/2 Floors: 1 'g Living Units:11 - ;, 5y,1 78 HST WW' .' di Sq 1,845 BROWN OR Jim Footage: Lot Size: 10,500 SQ FT Year Built: 1951 0 115 ft 36 54 40 MAP OF LARKINS Digital Orthophotography-2006 Legal PINES PB 24-20 LOT 22& Description: S1/2 LOT 23 BILK 3 LOT We appreciate our feedback, ease survey. SIZE 75.000 X 140 OR '�' pp fdbkl take a minute to complete our sur y please —�' 15537-1789 0592 1 Sale Information: My Home I Proper Information I Property Taxes Sale O/R: 15537-1789 I My Neighborhood I Property Appraiser Sale Date: 5/1992 Sale Amount: 1$170,000 Home I Using Our Site I About I Phone Directory I Privacy I Disclaimer Assessment Information: Year: 2007 2006 Land Value: $213,314 $185,679 Building Value: $154,316 $143,726 If you experience technical difficulties with the Property Information application, Market Value: $367,630 $329,405 please click here to let us know. Assessed Value: $367,630 $329,405 otal Exem tion& $0 $0 E-mail your comments,questions and suggestions to Webmaster axable Value: 1 $367,630 1$329,4051 Web Site ©2002 Miami-Dade County. All rights reserved. http://gisims2.miamidade.gov/myhome/propmap.asp 9/11/2007 Miami-Dade My Home Page 1 of 2 My Home . _ N Show Me: Property Information f .� Search By: a ,11 � Select Item - ��ae4. �• " t,,, . 0 Text only 4, Property Appraiser Tax Estimator ' ' t>e„�..- � � , F` � ;�s-rri Sr sw Summary Details: Folio No.: 9-4036-027-0320 Y' Property: 7630 SW 61 AVE ice' �•' a Mailing ANSELMO RIVERO 9 Address: rn 831 SW 117 AVE MIAMI FL 33175-1724 - f. Property Information: , Primary 0800 SINGLE FAMILY R .a°'� J_r ° a Zone: RESIDENCE as rM CLUC: 0001 RESIDENTIAL-SINGLE -FAMILYT Beds/Baths: /5 pl i Floors: Living Units:11 di Sq ,080 }' - Footage: GR OR �, yy; 3d r rs 51 Lot Size: 10,500 SQ FT tWIN Year Built: 2006 36 54 40 MAP OF LARKINS PINES PB 24-20 LOT 21 & Digital Orthophotography-2006 0 115 ft Legal N1/2 LOT 20 BILK 3 LOT Description: SIZE 75.000 X 140 OR 10933-1720 1080 1 COC 125547-4221 04 2007 1 'id' We appreciate your feedback,please take a minute to complete our survey. Sale Information: Sale O/R: 25547-4221 My Home I Property Information I Property Taxes Sale Date: /2007 1 My Neighborhood I Property Appraiser Sale Amount: 1,750,000 Assessment Information: Home I Using Our Site I About I Phone Directory I Privacy I Disclaimer Year: 2007 2006 Land Value: $213,314 $185,679 Building Value: $539,115 $0 Market Value: $752,429 $185,679 If you experience technical difficulties with the Property Information application, Assessed Value: $752,429 $185,679 please click here to let us know. otal Exemptions: $0 $0 axabie Value: 1 $752,429 1$185,6791 E-mail your comments,questions and suggestions to Webmaster Web Site ©2002 Miami-Dade County. All rights reserved. http://gisims2.miamidade.gov/myhome/propmap.asp 9/11/2007 Miami-Dade My Home Page 1 of 2 My Home N Show Me: Property Information t Search By: t Select Item 4 i 0 Text only Property Appraiser Tax Estimator " p SW 76TH 5 Summary Details: ` Folio No.: 09-4036-027-0230 a I Property: 7641 SW 62 AVE +>�-++ • , r Mailing &B PROP OF MIA INC ; M Address: 10449 NW 41 ST MIAMI FL L 33178-1807 ` Property Information: j ? ►Primary 800 OFFICE M °+fir c CLUC: 0081 VACANT LAND Beds/Baths: 0/0 Floors: 0 Living Units: 0 r dj Sq 0 Footage: - Lot Size: 7,000 SQ FT h sr Year Built: 0 - +. -:sL E30Wri t2... ,,� 36 54 40 MAP OF LARKINS Legal PINES PB 24-20 LOT 6 BLK Description: 3 LOT SIZE 50.000 X 140 OR Digital Orthophotography-2006 0 115 ft 19913-3207 0901 4 COC 21477-0305 07 2003 1 Sale Information: , We appreciate your feedback,please take a minute to complete our survey. Sale O/R: 21477-0305 Sale Date: 7/2003 Sale Amount: 1$300,000 My Home I Property Information I Proper y Taxes Assessment Information: I My Neighborhood I Property Appraiser Year: 2007 2006 Home I Using Our Site I About I Phone Directory I Privacy I Disclaimer Land Value: $420,000 $385,000 Building Value: $0 $0 Market Value: $420,000 $385,000 Assessed Value: $420,000 $385,000 If you experience technical difficulties with the Property Information application, Total Exem tions: $0 $0 please click here to let us know. axable Value: 1 $420,000 $385,000 E-mail your comments,questions and suggestions to Webmaster Web Site ©2002 Miami-Dade County. All rights reserved. http://gisims2.miamidade.gov/myhome/propmap.asp 9/11/2007 Miami-Dade My Home Page 1 of 2 My Home N Show Me: Property Information Q�� _ - ■ .�A Search By: • t Select Item ¢ '' ,.p Text only Property Appraiser Tax Estimator SW 76`r ST Lo Summary Details: " Folio No.: 9-4036-035-0010 i 2 Pro a 6202 S DIXIE HWY Mailing KIMCO SOUTH MIAMI 634 r '• ' < ddress: INC 'r , �' rn 3333 NEW HYDE PARK RD NEW HYDE PARK NEW YORK 11042 y C' ry r t t Property Information: y Primary , 6200 ARTERIAL BUSINESS Zone: lg CLUC: 0011 RETAIL Beds/Baths: 0/0 + Floors: Livin Units: 0 BROW Oft SW H S7 dj Sq Footage: 81720 Lot Size: 237,169 SQ FT Year Built: 1952 0 115 ft 36 54 40 5.44 AC M/L PALM Digital Orthophotography-2006 MIAMI HGTS AMD PB 38-52 BEG AT A PT 136.35FTN OF Legal SE COR TR 2 PB 38-52 FOR We appreciate your feedback,please take a minute to complete our survey. Description: POB TH RUN W305FT N151.07FT W103.16FT NWLY195.86FT TO ELY My Home I Property Information I ProperW Taxes R/W/L OF US I My Neighborhood I Property Appraiser Sale Information: Home I Using Our Site I About I Phone Directory I Privacy I Disclaimer Sale O/R: 16775-0463 Sale Date: 5/1995 Sale Amount: 1$6,380,000 Assessment Information: If you experience technical difficulties with the Property Information application, Year: 2007 2006 please click here to let us know. Land Value: $7,115,070 $4,743,380 Building Value: $3,049,740 $1,742,465 E-mail your comments,questions and suggestions to Webmaster Market Value: $10,164,810$6,485,845 Assessed Value: $10,164,810$6,485,845 Total Exemptions: $0 $0 [Taxable Value: 10,164,810 6,485,845 Web Site ©2002 Miami-Dade County. All rights reserved. http://gisims2.miamidade.gov/myhome/propmap.asp 9/11/2007 ELEV.34'-10' DaD a ALUM NNU l GRI RLETIvE TOP OF ROOF ELEV.31'-3' BLDG.HT. (AS PER CODE) ELEV,23'-101/2' ELEV. 16'-6' TOP OF BEAM 14 -- -- -_— _. 4 - Ial FIN.FIRST FLOOR ELEV.5'-6' } EXIST.GRADE ELEV.0'-0' WEST ELEVATION 6GALE: 115' - I'-0' ..e r w Property seen from the Northwest(Front) Property seen from the Southwest(Front) 'i Property seen from he Northeast(Rear) Property seen from the Southeast(Rear) `` ' li r J x A Property to the North (Front) Property to the South (Front) a� w *' t _ a �7 Ir Property to the South (Rear) Property to the North (Rear) gl �l Residential Property to the Southeast(Rear) Residential Property to the East(Rear) n. s Property to the West(Across Sreet) Property to the West(Across Street) 6" 4 � F i 7 Residential Architecture in Neighborhood Residential Architecture in Neighborhood A - M1 yy titu p y Residential Archiecture in Neighborhood Residential Architecture in Neighborhood f r I Residential Architecture in Neighborhood Residential Architecture in Neighborhood Tolaw V O+�ROOF ELE . 1ILM SIT, (A9 PER CODE) ULEV.251-01 E TOl OF EDAM eLE ® 4 Iy 1 Q G/ s FIN,FIRST FLOOR K ' it EXIST,GRADE ELEV.0'-V s &LOZ No WfST fLfVATION ARCHITECTS €L 1954)3213442