7150 SW 62 AVE ERPB-07-032-000 1
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
Excellence, Integrity, Inclusion
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& PRESERVATION BOARD
To: Chair & Members, Environmental Date: June 5, 2007
Review & Preservat' Board Tuesday 8:30 a.m.
Via: Julian H. Per
Planning Direc
From: Lourdes a r a-Hernandez Re: ERPB-07-032
Planner
Applicant: The Richard Brandon Co.
Location: 7150 SW 62 Avenue, South Miami, Florida
Request: CLARIFICATION OF STAFF REPORT
APPLICANT'S REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting approval from the Environmental Review and Preservation Board
(ERPB) for the revision to the new construction of the proposed building design, located west of
SW 62nd Avenue, and 200 feet north of 72nd Street (Sunset Drive) and an extension to obtain a
building permit.
STATUS REPORT (UP TO DATE):
The ERPB granted final approval with conditions on August 2, 2005, application number ERPB-
05-057 for new construction. However, the building permit has not been obtained within the six
month, time frame (applicant has had prior extensions) as required by Section 20-5.11(L), Land
Development Code.
Pursuant to Section 20-5.11(L) Expiration. Final approval by ERPB shall lapse
after six (6) months if no permit is issued, except as may be extended by the
ERPB for a period not to exceed six (6) months.
At this time, the applicant is requesting approval for a six month extension from the Board. The
revisions to the building permit have been reviewed and returned to the applicant pending
ERPB's approval. The architect, Jason Chandler, has revised the complete set of working
drawings for review and approval of the proposed revisions by the ERPB.
STAFF ANALYSIS:
The applicant is proposing to build a mixed-use office and retail building, "South Miami
Medical Arts Plaza." This project is located in the City's Transit Oriented Development District
(TODD MU-5). Mr. Brandon Lurie, owner of the subject property has provided a letter, dated
May 4, 2007, explaining the basis for the proposed design revisions. The property has an area
of"57,252 sf. or 1.31 acres. The proposed revision includes a reduction in total building square
feet (87,801sf to 83,010sf) and in the total number of parking spaces- (471 spaces to 389
spaces). The proposed revised plan calls for 73,000sf of office space and 10,010sf of retail
space. The parking requirements for the proposed uses are as follows:
• Office Space: 1 parking space per 250 square feet
7150 SW 62 Avenue
New Construction: Revisions
ERPB-June 5, 2007
Page 2 of 3
• Retail Space: 1 parking space per 300 square feet
It is important to note that in the retail category there may be uses which require a different
parking requirement ratio.
TODD MU-5 DISTRICT:
The purpose and intent of this regulation is to maximize the presence of a dedicated mass
transit center located within walking distance of the boundaries of the proposed district. The
maximum utilization' of that facility will be achieved through the creation of a district that
surrounds this major mass transit facility and is designed to encourage a mix of high density
uses, specifically residential, retail and office uses.
This district also offers a series bonus credits to promote efficient land use, decrease vehicular
traffic, provide convenience, establish a harmonious mix of uses all within a pedestrian friendly
environment. The following summarizes the permitted heights, bonus allocations, building and
their placement, and height and uses.
Pursuant to Section 20-8.3(D)(b) Permitted Heights: Todd (MU-5)- Two story
minimum: 4 story maximum; up to eight stories with bonus. Maximum height 100
feet.
Pursuant to Section 20-8.10 Bonus Allocations. Action: Public plaza-min. 5,000
sq. ft. and art work on plaza setting. Bonus: One (1) additional floor. (fifth floor).
Pursuant to Section 20-8.10 Bonus Allocations. Action: Develop full frontage with
street design as part of pedestrian walkway system. Bonus: One (1) additional
floor. (sixth floor).
Pursuant to Section 20-8.17p. 192 Building and their Placement. Building
Frontage = 100% of lot Frontage along built-to-line.
Pursuant to Section 20-8.17p. 195 Height and Uses. Face of Building with build
our over arcade.
Presently, the applicant is requesting final approval of the site and building design from the
ERPB. Please note that the mass model will be available at the ERPB meeting. Furthermore,
the current revisions must comply with the Land Development Code (LDC) and the Florida
Building Code (FBC) requirements.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the extension for an additional six month with the
following conditions:
1) Comply with the LDC and FBC requirements;
2) Signage for the building is not a part of this application;
3) No deliveries be made on SW 62 Avenue;
4) Comply with the conditions set forth in Resolution No. 53-05-12032; and
5) Any comments and/or concerns by the Board.
7150 SW 62 Avenue
New Construction: Revisions
ERPB-June 5, 2007
Page 3of3
Attachments:
ERPB Application
Brandon (owner) Letter of Intent, dated May 4, 2007
ERPB Final Approval letter, dated August 5, 2005
Land Development Code p. 192
Land Development Code p. 195
City Commission Resolution No. 53-05-12032
Response to Resolution No. 53-05-12032:
Jason Chandler (Architect of Record) letter dated July 15, 2005
Revised Construction Documents:
Cover sheet with aerial massing, rendering, and a drawing list: Sheet A-1 thru A-12, LA1
and LA-2.
Color Samples for the building (on file)
Photos (on file)
LCH
K:\ERPB\ERPB Agendas\2007 ERPB AGENDAS\ERPB June 5,2007\ERPB 07-032R.doc
Part 1
City of South Miami PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FEES
DATE: J_ CHECK NO: Y02 �'z
NAME:
ADDRESS: 1'"7 6pdg7l- PHONE NO: ito-�.
03.41.300 ERPB HEARING FEES
(Total)
Applications for new construction in the RS and RT zoning districts
Single unit ($500)
All other applications for:
New construction($600);Renovation($300); Signs, fences, walls, etc. ($150)
For each additional appearance before the Bo $100)'
VARIANCE
02.19.161 Advertisement and Notice Fees ............................($1,000)
03.41.200 Admin Fee.......................................................($1000)
(TOTAL$2000)
EACH ADDITIONAL VARIANCE............................($750)
SPECIAL USE/SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS
02.19.161 Advertisement and Notice Fees............................($1,000)
03.41.200 Admin Fee.......................................................($1000)
(TOTAL$2000)
02.19.161 REZONING APPLICATION (less than 10 acres).........($4000)
02.19.161 REZONING APPLICATION (more than 10 acres).....($13,500)
LDC TEXT AMENDMENT I(General standards,misc..provisions)
02.19.161 Advertisement and Notice Fees................................. ($1,000)
03.41.200 Admin Fee............... .......................................... ($1000)
(TOTAL$2000)
LDC TEXT AMENDMENT II(Change Permitted use Schedule)
:s 02.19.161 Advertisement and Notice Fees................................. ($3,000)
03.41.200 Admin Fee............... .......................................... ($1000)
TOTAL($4000)
02.19.161 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMEND AD FEE............$15,000)
03.41.200 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADMIN FEE..................($5,000)
":. (Total$20,000)
02.19.161 ADMINISTRATIVE WAIVER AD FEE.......................($250)
03.41.200 ADMINISTRATIVE WAIVER FEE...........................($ 500)
_,. (Total$750)
02.19.161 PUD/MAJOR CHANGE LEGAL ADS($1,000)
03.41.200 PUD/MAJOR CHANGE ADMIN FEE($2,500)
(Total $3500)
03.41.200 PUD MINOR CHANGE ADMIN FEE($1,000)
r
03.41.200 WAIVER-OF-PLAT APPLICATION($3,000)
c.,
TOTAL / e)o
E:\Forms\Receipt formAReceipt form UPDATED-REV 12-21-04.doc
08/30/07 THU 12:00 FAX 305 854 2323 WEISS SEROTA & HELFMAN X1001
WE,ISS SEROTA HELFMAN
PA,STORtZA COLE &BONI<SI E,P-1—
2525 Ponce de neon Blvd.
Suite 700
Miami,Florida 33134
Telephone(305) 854-0800
Telecopier(:305) 854-2323
C,'ONFIDENTIAZ,
TO: Julian.Perez Fax No. (305)668-7356
Tel No. (305)663-6327
FROM: Tony Recio
COMMENTS:
The information contained in this transmission is attorney privileged and confidential. it is intended only for Che use of
the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified
that any disser ninadon, distribution or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify as immediately by telephone collect and return the original message to us at the
above address via the U.S.Postal Service. We will reimburse you for postage.Thank you.
FILE NO.: 370004
DATE: August 30, 2007
NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: 3
PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY IF NOT RECEIVED PROPERLY
08/30/07 THU 12:01 FAX 305 854 2323 WEISS SEROTA & HELFHAN [a 002
WEISS SEFOTA HELFMAN
PA.STO]EiTZA COLE & BONTSKT,
A^rTORNEYS AT LAW
MI•rCHELL BICRMAN.P.A. A nROFESSIONAI.,LIMITED LIAUILITY COMPANY GREGORY A. NAII.,E
NINA L. DONISKL,P,A. INCLUDING PROFL'fJ.SIONAL ASSOCIATIONS JOHN J, KF;NDRICK III
HAkLENF FILVERN KENNEDY
MITC.HF.LL J. LM)RNSTEIN,P,A. MIAMI-FADE OFFICE
KARF,N LIEGE
.JAMIE ALAN COLE,P.A.
STEPI-tCN J. HLLFMAN,P.A. 2525 PONCE DE LEON BOULEVARD JO LUND HANNA M.LUNDGREN
GIL PASTORIZA, -"
10
MIC 14ALL S. POPOK.P,A. RAMI MAU GRAM
JOSEPH H. SE RATA, P.A. CORAL GABLE—;, >-LORIDA 33131 AL EXAN OER L.PALE N7_UELA-MAUkI"
Y IJNIOR PINE IRO
SUSAN L.1T+FVARTHLN,P.A.
JOHN J. UUICK
RICHAkCj JAY WE 1155,P.A.
[)AVID M.WULPIN,P.A. TELtPL{ONF 305-854-0800 ANTHONY L. DIN
FACSIMILE Z405 -323 SCOTT A. HOUIN
LYNN M, DANNHEI05ER WWw•w,GH LAW.COM GAIL D.SCROTA'
GNAC:IO G. DCt.VALLE JONATHAN C,F.HAMRES
DOUGLAG R, GONZALCS BROWARD OFFICE E5'IRLLLITA R.SIBtLA
MATTHLW N. MANDCL 200 EAST IJROWARO BOULLVAF(D•SUITE- 1900 L-DUARDO M.SOTO
MrI.ISSA P.AN[)F.RSON' - FORT LAUDERDALE, F LOk16A 33301 FLCTA A. STAMEN STINES
L ILUAN AHANGO DE LA HOz' TELEPHONE 5954-763-4242 F FACSIMILE 9;,4-7G 1-7770 STEVENI.L.TAYLOR
STEVEN E.TAYLOR
JAMES E. RAKER
PAM.S,VICARY
JEFF P.H.CAZEAU "OF COUNGCL
LAURA K.WE NDCLLN
RAOUEL ELLJABARRIETA
.JAMES E.WHITE
CHAD S. FRICO MAN �y/� ^7
CLINTON A.WRIC•IIT III
ALAN L.GABRICL' August 30, 200/
VIA FACSIMTLE U.S MAIL &
ELECTRONTC MAIL
Mr. Julian Perez
Director of Planning
City of South Miami
61.30 Sunset Drive
South Miami,FL 33143
Re: 7150-7160 SW 62"`1 Avenue
Dear Mr. Perez:
Thank you for meeting with us on Tuesday morning regarding development of the
captioned parcel. As you had requested, please consider this letter as firm confirmation that,
notwithstanding anything contained in the owner's application approved by the ERPR on May
15, 2007,the building permit application will not provide for any more than the 7,801 square feet
of retail space consistent with the original City Commission resolution approving the project
(Resolution No. 53-05-1,2032), 1 trust that,based upon this.confirmation,the owner may proceed
to submit plans to the City for a building permit.
We would like to clarify the fact that the owner retains flexibility as to the portion of the
building to be allocated to retail uses. While it is agreed that we will not exceed 7,801 square
feet of retail space, it has always been the owner's intent to preserve as much flexibility in terms
of tenant mix as possible in order to respond to a rapidly adjusting market. That is, while the
overall size of the building would remain unchanged without appropriate approval (that is, the
total floor area will not exceed 83,010 square feet in accordance with the May 15, 2007 ERPl3
approval), the owner may, without seeking additional approval of either. the City Commission,
08/30/07 THU 12:.01 FAX 305 854 2323 WEISS SEROTA & HELFMAN R 003
Mr. Juliar<Perez
August 30,2007
Page 2
Planning Board or ERPB, allocate area between the office and retail uses $o long as the retail
space does not exceed 7,801 square feet. It should be noted that medical office uses generate by
far the greatest parking need under the code; any increase to the retail component coupled with
the corresponding decrease in medical office would reduce the number of required parking
spaces,thereby creating a greater surplus than contemplated in my August 10, 2007 letter.
Based on the foregoing, please confirrn, at your earliest convenience, that 1) plans may
be submitted for permit processing in accordance with the above and the parameters of m.y letter
of August 10, 2007, and 2) the owner retains flexibility (subject to the limitation as noted) to
allocate space in the building between the office and retail uses.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please call me if you have any questions.
Very truly yours,
Tony Recio
TR/ms
370004
cc: Brandon Lurie
Lourdes Cabrera-llernandez(via electronic mail)
'WEISS S1:RO-rA. HELFMAN
1"AS'TQRI%A COLE & BoNISKF, P.L.
WEISS SEROTA HELFMAN
PASTORIZA COLE & BONISKE, P.L.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
MITCHELL BIERMAN. P.A. - A PROFESSIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY GREGORY A. HAILE
NINA L. BONISKE;P.A. - INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS JOHN J. KENDRICK III
MITCHELL J< BURNSTEIN, P.A. - HARLENE SILVERN KENNEDY
' - - MIAMI
OFFICE KAREN LIEBERMAN*
JAMIE ALAN COLE, P.A.
STEPHEN J. HELFMAN,, P.A.,".: _ - 2525 PONCE DE LEON BOULEVARD JOHANNA M. LUNDGREN
GILBERTO PASTORIZA, P.A. SUITE 700 ANDREW W. MAI
MICHAEL S. POPOK, P.A. - PAMI MAUGHAM
JOSEPH H.SEROTA, P.A. CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 ALEXANDER L. PALE NZUELA-MAURI"
SUSAN L. TREVARTHEN, P.A. YUNIOR PINEIRO
RICHARD JAY WEISS, P.A. JOHN J. QUICK
DAVID M. WOLPIN, P.A. TELEPHONE 305-854-0800 ANTHONY L. RECIO
FACSIMILE 305-854-2323 SCOTT A. ROBIN
LYNN M. DANNHEISSER
WWW.WSH-LAW.COM GAIL D. SEROTA*
IGNACIO G. DEL VALLE
D JONATHAN C. SHAMRES
DOUGLAS R. GONZALES
BROWARD OFFICE ESTRELUTA S. SIBILA
MATTHEW H. MANDEL 200 EAST BROWARD BOULEVARD • SUITE 1900 EDUARDO M. SOTO
MELISSA P.ANDERSON'S FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33301 FLETA A. STAMEN
LILLIAN ARANGO DE LA HOZ* TELEPHONE 954-763-4242 • FACSIMILE 954-764-7770 MICHAEL L. STINES
JAMES E. BAKER STEVEN E. TAYLOR
JEFF P.H.CAZEAU PAUL S.VICARY
RAQUEL ELEJABARRIETA "OF COUNSEL LAURA K.WENDELL*
CHAD S. FRIEDMAN JAMES E.WHITE
ALAN L. GABRIEL` August 30, 2007 CLINTON A.WRIGHT III"
VIA FACSIMILE, U.S MAIL, &
ELECTRONIC MAIL
Mr. Julian Perez
Director of Planning - ��
City of South Miami
6130 Sunset Drive €' AUG 3 1 2007
South Miami, FL 33143 ! %�
Fjr �a1r
rI. J L_.......--mar.�.-.....�....'..'..�—'-.....-..�s 0 4
Re: 7150-7160 SW 62"d Avenue
Dear Mr. Perez:
Thank you for meeting with us on Tuesday morning regarding development of the
captioned parcel. As you had requested, please consider this letter as firm confirmation that,
notwithstanding anything contained in the owner's application approved by the E?RpB on May
15, 2007, the building permit application will not provide for any more than the 7,801 square feet
of retail space consistent with the original City Commission resolution approving the project
(Resolution No. 53-05-12032). I trust that, based upon this confirmation, the owner may proceed
to submit plans to the City for a building permit.
We would like to clarify the fact that the owner retains flexibility as to the portion of the
building to be allocated to retail uses. While it is agreed that we will not exceed 7,801 square
feet of retail space, it has always been the owner's intent to preserve as much flexibility in terms
of tenant mix as possible in order to respond to a rapidly adjusting market. That is, while the
overall size of the building would remain unchanged without appropriate approval (that is, the
total floor area will not exceed 83,010 square feet in accordance with the May 15, 2007 ERPB
approval), the owner may, without seeking additional approval of either the City Commission,
" Mr. Julian Perez
August 30, 2007
Page 2
Planning Board or ERPB, allocate area between the office and retail uses so long as the retail
space does not exceed 7,801 square feet. 'It should be noted that medical office uses generate by
far the greatest parking need under the code; any increase to the retail component coupled with
the corresponding decrease in medical office would reduce the number of required parking
spaces, thereby creating a greater surplus than contemplated in my August 10, 2007 letter.
Based on the foregoing, please confirm, at your earliest convenience, that 1) plans may
be submitted for permit processing in accordance with the above and the parameters of my letter
of August 10, 2007, and 2) the owner retains flexibility (subject to the limitation as noted) to
allocate space in the building between the office and retail uses.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please call me if you have any questions.
Very truly yours,
Tony Recio
TR/ms
370004
cc: Brandon Lurie
Lourdes Cabrera-Hernandez (via electronic mail)
WEISS SEROTA HELFMAN
PASTOBIZA COLE & BONISKE, P.L.
WEISS SEiaoTA HELFMAN
PASTOPIZA COLE & BONISKE, P.L.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
MITCHELL BIERMAN,P.A. A PROFESSIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY CHAD S.FRIEDMAN
NINA L. BONISKE,P.A. - INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS JOHN J. KENDRICK III
MITCHELL J. BURNSTEIN,P.A. HARLENE SILVERN KENNEDY
JAMIE ALAN COLE,P.A. - MIAMI-DADE OFFICE KAREN LIEBERMAN*
STEPHEN J. HELFMAN,P.A. 2525 PONCE DE LEON BOULEVARD JOHANNA M. LUNDGREN
GILBERTO PASTORIZA,P.A. ANDREW W. MAI
MICHAEL S. POPOK,P.A. SUITE 700 PAMI MAUGHAM
JOSEPH H.SEROTA,P.A. CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 ALEXANDER L. PALENZUELA-MAORI'
SUSAN L.TREVARTHEN, P.A. JOHN J.QUICK
RICHARD JAY WEISS,P.A.
ANTHONY L. RECIO
DAVID M.WOLPIN.P.A. TELEPHONE 305-854-0800 SCOTT A. ROBIN
FACSIMILE 305-854-2323 GAIL D.SEROTA'
DANIEL L.ABBOTT
WWW WSH-LAW.COM � JONATHAN C.SHAMRES
LYNN M. DANNHEISSER SIBILA
IGNACIO G. DEL VALLE E S.
BROWARD OFFICE EDUAR DUARD ITA DO M.SOTO OTO
ALAN L. GABRIEL 200 EAST BROWARD BOULEVARD •SUITE 1900 FLETA A.STAMEN
DOUGLAS R. GONZALES
MATTHEW H. MANDEL FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33301 MICHAEL L.STINES
BRETT J. SCHNEIDER TELEPHONE 954-763-4242 • FACSIMILE 954-764-7770 NANCY STUPARICH'
STEVEN E.TAYLOR
MELISSA P.ANDERSON PAUL S.VICARY
LILLIAN ARANGO DE LA HOZ*
OF COUNSEL LAURA K.WENDELL`
JEFF P.H.CAZEAU JAMES E.WHITE
RAQUEL ELEJABARRIETA August 10, 2007 CLINTON A.WRIGHT III*
VIA FACSIMILE & U.S MAIL
Mr. Julian Perez
Director of Planning
City of South Miami
6130 Sunset Drive o,
South Miami; FL 33143
Re: 7150-7160 SW 62"d Avenue
Dear Mr. Perez:
We have been advised of your position relating to the permissible mix of uses in the
approved office building located at approximately 7150-7160 SW 62nd Avenue. In light of your
insistence that the entire office area be devoted to medical office use, this will confirm our
client's intent to construct approximately 80,000 square feet of medical office space, 3,010
square feet of retail space, and 389 parking spaces in accordance with plans approved by the
Environmental Review and Preservation Board.
In order to avoid further confusion regarding this approved site plan, we ask that you
confirm that the following building program meets the City's requirements under the large scale
development approval originally approved by City Commission Resolution No. 53-05-12032:
Medical Office Floor Area 80,000 sf 379 spaces*
Retail Floor Area 3,010 sf 10 spaces
Subtotal: 389 spaces
Less 5% 20 spaces**
Mr. Julian Perez
August 10, 2007
Page 2
Total Required: 369 spaces
Total Provided: 389 spaces
Surplus Parking 20 spaces
* Please note that at the time of the original approval, Section 20-8.10 of the Land Development
Code provided that floor area over the arcade is not to be counted towards parking requirements.
In this case, the area over the arcade consists of three floors of 1,406 square feet for a total of
4,218 square feet. Suniracting-the-a ea,ove 'lie u ea c ens file total office floor� ea resz]lts in.a
floor area of 75,782 square feet for the purposes of determining parking requirements.
** Also note that at the time of the original approval, Section 20-8.10 of the Land Development
Code provided an as-of-right reduction of 5% of generally applicable parking requirements for
inclusion of the arcade.
Please confirm that this development program is acceptable and meets the requirements
of the code and Resolution No. 53-05-12032 which originally approved the proposed mixed-use
development at this location.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please call me if you have any questions.
Very truly yours,
4onyy Recio
TR/ms
370004
cc: Brandon Lurie
Richard Mattaway
Stephen Helfman, Esq.
k�
AUG 13 2007
c
WEISS SEHOTA HELFMAN
PASTOBIZA COLE & BONISKE, P.L.
' sour
04 �1
U
• INCORPORATED
1927
C O.RtO
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW & PRESERVATION BOARD
REGULAR MEETING
SUMMARY MINUTES
Tuesday,June 5, 2007
8:30 AM
I. CALL TO ORDER
Action: Mr. Trautman, Chairman, called the meeting to order at 8:32 A.M.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Action: The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.
III. ROLL CALL
Action: Mr. Trautman performed roll call.
Board members present constituting a quorum: Mr. Trautman, Mr. Chandler, Mr. Bedell, Mrs.
Morales-Fernandez, Mr. Rivera, Mr. Balli, Mrs. Mark, and Mr. Fernandez.
City staff present: Julian H. Perez (Planning Director), Lourdes Cabrera-Hernandez (Planner),
Marcus Lightfoot (Permit Facilitator) and Michelle Valerio (Dept. Head Secretary Asst.)
IV. REQUESTS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
1)NEW CONSTRUCTION: FINAL: [ERPB-07-001]
Applicant: Poinciana Properties, Inc.
Location: 7637 SW 59 Court
South Miami, FL
Request: Applicant is requesting approval
for a new construction final review.
Z:\ERPB\ERPB Minutes\2007 Minutcs\ERPB MINS June 5,2007.doc'
Pagel of 6
Applicant present: Antonio Rodriguez
Action: At today's meeting the Board, staff, and applicant discussed the request. The subject
property first appeared before the ERPB on January 2, 2007, and received preliminary approval
from the Board with the following conditions.
• Staff recommended that the final swimming pool design be consistent with the
requirements set forth in the Land Development Code.
• Provide exterior paint colors
• Provide a color rendering
• Provide a proposed landscape plan prior to final ERPB
• Provide grading and irrigation plan prior to final ERPB
• Provide engineering plans prior to final ERPB
Mr. Bedell commented on the American Beauty along the drive way. He recommended it
should be a different shrub species that does not grow too tall because the beauty berry will form
a screen. The Duranta Gold Mound would be a better selection. Mrs. Mark inquired if the City is
still using Gumbo Limbos for city purposes, because the landscape plans show two Gumbo
Limbos were to be removed. The applicant rectified to the Board that those two Gumbo Limbos
were not touched, only some non-native trees and two trees that were damaged by past hurricane.
Motion: Mr. Chandler motioned to have final approval with the conditions recommended by Mr.
Bedell. Mrs. Mark seconded.
• The swale shall be modified and moved away from the existing trees
• Change the shrub species along the driveway.
Vote: Approved: 8 Opposed: 0
2) EXTERIOR RENOVATION: [ERPB-07-038]
Applicant: Carlos Telleria.
Location: 6140 South Dixie Highway
Request: Applicant is requesting approval for
an exterior renovation.
Applicant present: James Chastanet and James Cobo (Representing Mr. Telleria)
Action: At today's meeting, the Board, staff, and applicant discussed the request. The applicant
is requesting approval for the exterior renovation located on 6140 South Dixie Highway. The
applicant's intent is to renovate the existing storefront by extending the parapet wall 3 feet in
height by 25 feet in length; which equates to an addition of 75 square feet to the existing
storefront on a building that faces South Dixie Highway. By extending the parapet wall by 3
additional feet, the total height of the building will be increased to 17'-6". Pursuant to the
Dimensional Requirements for Non-Residential Districts, Section 20-3.517 of the Land
Development Code, this increase in height does not exceed.the maximum building height
allowable of 30 feet. The applicant is also proposing the replacement of the storefront glazing
Z:\ERPB\ERPB Minutes\2007 Minutes\ERPB MINS June 5,2007.doc
Page 2 of 6
with new clear '/4 inch tempered glass with silver mullions and trim. Mr. Balli mentioned that
there is a white stucco band that is on top of the existing parapet which seems to be three
quarters of an inch outside of the building. Mr. Balli than questioned whether the new parapet
will be flushed with the existing or whether the band will go across. Should it go across the
proposed elevation will not look like what is being presented to the Board. The applicant stated
that the band will wrap around the edge of the parapet. Mrs. Mark stated that the building will
look unbalanced. Mr. Fernandez then suggested that the eyebrow be visually extended with 'a
framed object. The applicant then reminded the Board that the building's facade itself is not
symmetrical. Mr. Chandler then added that another option would be to put the eyebrow over the
entrance door. The applicant preferred to use the suggestion presented by Mr. Chandler.
Motion: Mr. Chandler motioned to do a preliminary approval in order to provide the applicant
ample time to address the imbalance of the facade, by either adding the stucco band across the
unprotected windows, or by adding the eyebrow over the existing door that is unprotected. The
applicant had a.proposal which was a sketch of the complete eyebrow which is what the Board is
suggesting at this moment. Mr. Chandler then amended his motion to grant final approval to the
attached drawing of a full eyebrow. Mr. Bedell seconded the motion.
Vote: Approved 8 Opposed 0
3) CLARIFICATION OF STAFF REPORT: [ERPB 07-031
Applicant: The Richard Brandon Co
62 Avenue Plaza LLC.
Location: 7150 SW 62 Avenue
South Miami, Fl
Request: Staff is requesting approval for staff
report clarification.
Applicant present: Staff
Action: At today's meeting, the Board, staff, and applicant discussed the request. The applicant
is requesting approval from the ERPB for the revision to the new construction of the proposed
building design, located west of SW 62nd Avenue, and 200 feet north of 72nd Street. They are
also requesting an extension to obtain a building permit. Mr. Perez explained that this is a
clarification on the wording in the staff analysis which reads; "The applicant is proposing to
build a mixed-use medical office and retail building," to "The applicant is proposing to build a
mixed-use office and retail building." By adding the word "medical" to the request it is causing a
change in the original application that was approved by the Planning Board and City
Commission. If the applicant wants to continue with office use, the application would have to go
back before the Planning Board and City Commission for approval.
Motion: Mrs. Mark motioned to approve the revision made by staff on the application. Mr.
Bedell seconded the motion.
Vote: Approved 7 Opposed 0 Recused: Mr. Chandler
Z:\ERPB\ERPB Minutes\2007 Minutes\ERPB MINS June 5,2007.doc
Page 3 of 6
4) EXTERIOR PAINTING AND AWNING: [ERPB 07-035]
Applicant: MR Properties, Inc.
Location: 5829 SW 73 Street
South Miami, Fl
Request: Applicant is requesting an exterior
painting and awning.
Applicant present: Mr. George McCartle and Architect
Action: At today's meeting, the Board, staff, and applicant discussed the request. The applicant
is requesting approval for the exterior paint colors and the colors of the fabric samples for the
proposed awnings at the above referenced location. The applicant also presented three different
color scheme proposals. Mr. Fernandez suggested that the color palette should be light and
neutral. Mr. Balli agreed, however, he reiterated that there should be a difference in colors
between the parking levels and the pedestrian levels. Mrs. Mark added that the grill work was
done in black as opposed to having something more neutral. Mr. Fernandez then suggested that
the store front should be anodized and the metal work should be a clear anodized finish, and also
added that the awning colors are very dark colors. Mr. Trautman said that neutralizing the whole
building would be a huge mistake. After extensive discussion the Board agreed on proposal A
with some changes. The color palette changed from Glowing Umber (182), Beverly Hills (180),
and Mushroom Cap (177) to Beverly Hills (180), and Mushroom Cap (177), and 50% of
Mushroom Cap (177). The Board also decided that the master colors for the awnings must be
Victoria Green for the upper level awnings, the family awnings be Black, Victoria Green,
Burgundy, and Charcoal, and the awnings on the corner tower be Victoria Green.
Motion: Mr. Trautman motioned to have a final approval for the colors application, given the
Boards discussion the change from the rendering of the awnings on the second level and above.
Approve the family of colors for the base level awnings being the Burgundy, Victoria Green,
Charcoal, and Black; and on the alley elevation the two doors on the end towers would also have
Victoria Green awnings. It was also suggested that all public entrances have Victoria Green
awnings as well.
Vote: Approved: 5 Opposed: 3 (Mr. Fernandez, Mrs. Mark, Mr. Balli)
5) SIGNAGE INSTALLATION: [ERPB 07-0391
Applicant: MR Properties, Inc.
Location: 5829 SW 73 Street
South Miami, Fl
Request: Applicant is requesting a signage
installation.
Applicant present: Mr. George McCartle
Z:\ERPB\ERPB Minutes\2007 Minutes\ERPB MINS June 5,2007.doc
Page 4 of 6
Action: At today's meeting, the Board, staff, and applicant discussed the request. The applicant
is requesting approval for the exterior signage installation at 5829 SW 73 Street. Mr. Chandler
commented on the large parking sign that reads "South Miami Municipal Parking" on SW 58h
Court should not be used to identify the entrance to the parking garage. The garage is the most
dominant building on the whole street, and the garage entrance can be easily located. The Board
members agreed with the comment made by Mr. Chandler. Mr. Fernandez also added that the
signs are not consistent with the color renderings. For example, the letters in "South Miami
Municipal Parking Garage," are black acrylic letters, yet in the 3-D rendering of the building
some of the signage in the corner of the building looks to be stainless steel or an anodized metal.
The parking in the rendering has a nice sign on the corner and they look like metallic letters,but
then you see a black box with yellow letters. Mrs. Mark then added that there is no coordination
with the signage, and the signage should be done in conjunction with the master plan. Mrs. Mark
then suggested that there should be a master plan that explains what will be done, and the exact
coordinated colors that will be used, and she also added that the "valet" sign should be a non-
illuminated sign that can be moved to different locations.
Motion: Mr. Chandler motioned defer to allow the applicant to present a master plan for signage
that includes parking, and where the tenants will be placing their signs.
Vote: Approved: 8 Opposed: 0
6) SIGNAGE AND AWNING INSTALLATION: [ERPB 07-036]
Applicant: Lillian Hernandez
Smoothielicious Cafe
Location: 6102 South Dixie Highway
South Miami, Fl
Request: Applicant is requesting a signage and
awning installation.
Applicant present: No applicant
Action: There was no applicant present, therefore this item was not considered by the Board.
V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Minutes for regular meeting held on May 15, 2007
Action: The Board approved the minutes of May 15, 2007 as presented. Mr. Chandler asked Mr.
Perez for clarification regarding the status on the lobbying issue which is stated in item number
four. Mr. Perez responded that he spoke with the City Attorney and the City Attorney will attend
the next meeting and address any issues and/or concerns the Board Members may have. Mr.
Perez also added that if there were any questions regarding the Code of Conduct or the lobbying
issue to please call the City Attorney. Mr. Chandler then inquired if item number ERPB-07-034
was pulled from the agenda because there was a comment made by a citizen. Staff member Mrs.
Cabrera-Hernandez replied that this item was previously approved by the Planning Board and the
City Commission. She added that it was submitted to the ERPB with different proposals other
Z:\ERPB\ERPB Minutes\2007 Minutes\ERPB MINS June 5,2007.doc
Page 5 of 6
than what was approved by the Planning Board and City Commission, therefore staff pulled the
item from the agenda. Mr. Perez advised there were differences in square footage, parking, and
non-compliances with the ADA. It is the policy in the Planning Department that there will be
zero tolerance regarding discrepancies with what was approved by either a Board or City
Commission. Mr. Trautman inquired about the decision making process for items that appear
before the ERPB. Mr. Perez stated that the eight day policy allows staff to review the application
thoroughly in order to ensure that there are no discrepancies with what is recommended by staff
and what is agreed upon with the applicant. Mr. Perez also added that the Planning Director
makes the final decision on whether the applications will go before the ERPB. Mrs. Morales-
Fernandez inquired if the City is relocating trees, Mr. Perez responded that he would get in
contact with the Public Works department and get more information on that subject.
Motion: Mr. Bedell motioned to approve the minutes as they were typed. Mr. Trautman
seconded the motion.
Vote: Approved: 8 Opposed: 0
VII. REMARKS: Mr. Balli inquired about the status on Mr. Peter Jude. Mr. Perez responded
that the next step is to reappoint Mr. Jude as soon as possible.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Action: There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at approximately 10:48 A.M
An appeal of an ERPB decision or recommendation may be filed at any time before a building permit is issued by filing same with the city clerk
upon a form prescribed therefore. Appeals may be taken by the applicant,interested citizens,or the city administration[per§20-6.2(A)of the
City's Land Development Code]. If you have any questions concerning this matter,please contact Lourdes Cabrera-Hernandez,of the Planning
&Zoning Department,between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM,Monday through Friday,at 305.663.6347.
LCH
Z:\ERPB\ERPB Minutes\2007 Minutes\ERPB MINS June 5,2007.doc
Page 6 of 6
i ,�»�h,.. ,� ,..�_� .,. y,l-.w� •.t�.'.^..>.�r'....� y _ y v, 4... 5. _ y.' i.1M. r.,y��,4.,tar��.« ��..`.._'+.
Part 1 ':.
City of South Miami PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION.FEES
DATE: �5- 1.1 6)2 CHECK NO: /9 =2.
NAME: `;:
ADDRESS: PHONE N.O. f
03.41.300 ERPB HEARING FEES Y ° l
(Total)
Applications for new construction in the RS and RT zoning districts
Single unit ($500)
All other applications for:
New construction($600);Renovation($300); Signs, fences, walls, etc. ($150)
For each additional appearance before the Board—( 00)
VARIANCE
02.19.161 Advertisement and Notice Fees ............................($1,000)
03.41.200 Admin Fee.......................................................($1000)
(TOTAL$2000)
EACH ADDITIONAL VARIANCE............................($750)
SPECIAL USE/SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS
02.19.161 Advertisement and Notice Fees ............................($1,000)
03.41.200 Admin Fee.......................................................($1000)
(TOTAL$2000)
02.19.161 REZONING.APPLICATION (less than 10 acres).........($4000) �-
02.19.161 REZONING APPLICATION (more than 10 acres).....($13,500)
LDC TEXT AMENDMENT I(General standards,misc..provisions)
02.19.161 Advertisement and Notice Fees................................. ($1,000)
03.41.200 Admin Fee............... .......................................... ($1000)
(TOTAL$2000)
LDC TEXT AMENDMENT II(Change Permitted use Schedule)
02.19.161 Advertisement and Notice Fees................................. ($3,000)
F 03.41.200 Admin Fee............... .......................................... ($1000)
�.a
TOTAL($4000)
-02.19.161 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMEND AD FEE............$15,000)
03.41.200 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADMIN FEE..................($5,000)
9 (Total$20,000)
02.19.161 ADMINISTRATIVE WAIVER.AD FEE.......................($250)
03.41.200 ADMINISTRATIVE WAIVER FEE...........................($ 500)
(Total$750)
02.1.9.161 PUD/MAJOR CHANGE LEGAL ADS($1,000)
03.41.200 PUD/MAJOR CHANGE ADMIN FEE ($2,500)
(Total $3500)
03.41.200 PUD MINOR CHANGE ADMIN FEE($1,000)
rte
r•�
03.41.200 WAIVER-OF-PLAT APPLICATION($3,000)
TOTAL
r
E:\Forms\Receipt forms\Receipt form UPDATED-REV 12-21-04.doc