Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
10-14-04
Chair Vice Chair Member Member Member Member Member Making our Neighborhood a Great Place to live Mrk and Play" Mary Scott Russell CRA General Counsel Velma Palmer CRA Director Randy G. Wiscombe CRA Secretary Marie Birts- Cooper Craig Z. Sherar Nancy Cobb Viola Bryan Eve Boutsis Joseph Gibson Maria M. Menendez SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY' CRA Meeting Meeting date: October 14, 2004 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, FL Next Regular Meeting Date: TBA Phone: (305) 668 -7236 Time: 7:00 PM City of South Miami Ordinance No. 10 -00 -1712 requires all lobbyists before engaging in any lobbying activities. to register with the City Clerk and pay an annual fee of $125.00. This applies to all persons who are retained (whether paid.or not) to represent a business entity or organization to influence "City" action. "City" action is broadly described to include the ranking and.selection of professional consultants, and virtually all - legislative, quasi - judicial and administrative action. It does °not apply.to not-for-profit organizations, local chamber and merchant groups, homeowner associations, or trade associations and.unions. CALL TO ORDER: 1. ROLL CALL: 2. INVOCATION: 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1 AGENDA - October 14, 2004 ITEMS FOR TIME BOARD'S CONSIDERATION: 4. Approval of Minutes August 24, 2004 July 29, 2004 5. Special Presentation A. Ms. Christina Cuervo, Assistant City Manager, City of Miami Beach, and Director of two CRA's B. Ms. Bobby Mumford, Marketing & Public Relations Consultant 6. CRA Director's Report: A. Status of "Findings of Necessity" B. Responses to CRA Board Requests for Information 7. CRA General Counsel's Report: A. Leroy Taylor Property Update (There are no items) RESOLUTION (S) 8. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (SMCRA) RELATING TO AGREEMENTS; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO ISSUE A PURCHASE ORDER IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $48,750.00; CHARGING THE AMOUNT TO CASH CARRY OVER; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 2 AGENDA October 14, 2004 9. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RELATING TO ATTORNEY'S FEES; APPROVING ATTORNEY'S FEES FOR NAGIN GALLOP FIGUEREDO, P.A., IN THE AMOUNT OF $7,296.52; CHARGING THE 'AMOUNT TO ACCOUNT NO. 610- 1110 - 564- 31 -20, GENERAL CORPORATE; AND $204.30; CHARGING THE AMOUNT TO ACCOUNT NO. 610 - 1110 - 583- 61 -10, LAND ACQUISITION; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. , SPEAKERS : PLEASE : TAKE NOTICE THAT SECTION''2 2 -1(k) , (2) OF THE CODE . OF ORDINANCES' PROVIDES THAT "ANY. PERSON MAKING PERSONAL IMPERTINENT r ' OR SLANDEROUS .: REMARKS. OR ` WHO SHALL''BECOME BOISTEROUS WHILE ADDRESSING THE`COMMISSION SHALL ::BE FORTHWITH BARRED FROM FURTHER.`` AUDIENCE ::BEFORE THE '''COUNCIL BY- THE:PRESIDING OFFICER,.'UNLESS PERMISSION TO CONTINUE: BE :GRANTED BY A MAJORITY. `, VOTE OF .'THE`. COMMISSION.", PUBLIC COMMENTS BOARD COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT PURSUANT TO FLA STATUTES 286.0105, "THE CITY HEREBY ADVISES THE PUBLIC THAT IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THIS BOARD, AGENCY OR COMMISSION WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT ITS MEETING OR HEARING, HE OR SHE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, AND THAT FOR SUCH PURPOSE, AFFECTED PERSON MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. THIS NOTICE DOES NOT CONSTITUTES CONSENT. BY THE CITY FOR THE INTRODUCTION OR ADMISSION OR OTHERWISE INADMISSIBLE OR IRRELEVANT EVIDENCE, NOR DOES IT AUTHORIZE CHALLENGES OR APPEALS NOT OTHERWISE ALLOWED BY LAW. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 3 AGENDA - October 14, 2004 i T i 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 7001 *h1akaV aurAkVhbodwda Gnat Fk= W L'a FWbdc and Pia KRAFT SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCYMINUTES AUGUST 24, 2004 CALL TO ORDER: The South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency met in regular session on Thursday, August 24, 2004 beginning at 6:25 p.m.,.. in the City Commission Chambers, 6130 Sunset..Dr_ive_._ 1. ROLL CALL: The following members of the CRA Board were present: Chairperson Mary Scott Russell, Vice Chair 'Velma Palmer and Members Randy G. Wiscombe Marie Birts- Cooper, Craig Z. Sherar, Nancy Cobb and Viola Bryan. Also in attendance were: CRA General Council Eve,Boutsis, CRA Director Joseph Gibson, CRA Secretary Representative Nkenga Payne and CRA Program Coordinator James McCants. 2. INVOCATION: Invocation was conducted by Reverend Harris. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison. ITEMS FOR TIME BOARD'S CONSIDERATION: 4. Approval of Minutes a) May 13, 2004 Chair Russell amended the minutes on page 9, line 32 to reflect that the scholarship would not be reimbursable, but that it would be given to the recipient up front. Moved by Chair Russell, seconded by Member Wiscombe, the motion to approve the minutes as amended passed by,a 6 -0 vote. Member Wiscombe: Yea COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1 MINUTES — August 24, 2004 1 Member Cobb: Yea 2 Member Sherar: Yea 3 Member Bryan: Yea 4 Member Birts- Cooper: Yea 5 Chairperson Russell: Yea 6 Vice Chair Palmer: Out of the Room 7 8 5. CRA Director's Report: 9 10 A. SMCRA preliminary Budget review 11 *Tentative dates 9/9/04 and 9/23/04 12 Mr. Gibson.polled the Board about these-tentative dates. It 13 was the consensus of the Board-to confirm the 9th and the 23rd at 14 6:30 p.m. as the dates for the CRA budget hearings. 15 16 Mr. Gibson then indicated that he had included in the 17 Board's package a budget message for their approval and feedback. 18 He then went over the Tax Increment Financing Funds (TIFF) for 19 the past five years, with a cumulative figure of $3,633,198 which 20 includes the City's and County's share. 21 22 B. Ground breaking for Miss Denise Goodman and Miss 23 Gloria Brown 24 25 Mr. Gibson also discussed the dates for the ground breaking 26 of Miss Goodman and Miss Brown. The date was set for Thursday, 27 September 9, 2004 at 4:30 p.m. Chair Russell asked Mr. Gibson to 28 email them the exact addresses of the homes. 29 30 5. CRA General Counsel's Report: 31 32 Member Sherar referred to a letter from Mr. Gibson dated 33 August 11th. Mr. Gibson indicated that he did not deem 34 appropriate to discuss that issue at this meeting - since is was 35 not on the Agenda but that he would be glad to set up an 36 appointment to go over it at another time.. Chair Russell said 37 that neither she nor any other member of the Board had a copy of 38 the referred letter; therefore they would place it on the agenda 39 for the next meeting. Member Sherar said that in deference of 40 the Chair he will put it off until the next meeting. He said 41 'that one of the questions he will be asking is how many acres in 42 the CRA area is the zoning in excess of four stories. Another 43 question was about the Mobley building, asking as to what has 44 been happening to this building since the CRA bought it. Mr. 45 Gibson indicated that they. have one of the bays rented and the 46 other three are vacant. They have received a lot of inquiries 47 but since the Mobley building is one of the options in terms of COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 2 MINUTES — August 24, 2004 the plans for the pool, the building is in `limbo' at the present time for that reason.' Member Sherar asked as to how much the Mobley building cost us and what would be the present value. Chair Russell clarified that the CRA had paid approximately $400,000 but that it has gone up in value and what has been collected every year is equivalent to what is being paid in taxes every year. She then urged Member Sherar to go ahead and ask any questions now so that the Director could have the answers for him at the next meeting. Mr. McCants explained that during his tenure there have been five different directors of the CRA, and each one had a different idea of what they envisioned for the Mobley building. The first one wanted to do an incubator, and before it became a reality he left. The next director wanted to do a mixed venture with an incubator and a credit union coming in. The following director followed up on the idea of an incubator, combined with bringing in the CAA to provide social services. Chair Russell said that there had been still another project, to move the CRA. offices to this property. Chair Russell said that for the next meeting they need to know what we paid for the Mobley property, what its current value is, what the annual taxes are, and she asked staff to do it progressively on a spread sheet from the day it purchased until now, and what the income is.. Member Sherar said that he also would like to hear from Mr. Balogun about the plans to build the pool. Chair Russell also directed Mr. Gibson to bring to the next .meeting a spread sheet with the progress of the Madison Square Saturdays project. Chair Russell then indicated that they had agreed to do a six -month review for Mr. Gibson. She said that it is time to start with the review process and the format that the*Board will follow so that they all ask the same questions. She said that maybe with the help of Member Wiscombe and the City Attorney they can put together a formal review process for the CRA director, as that was one of the conditions for hiring him. Member Cobb with regard to the ground breaking referenced above asked as to when the houses will start being built once the ground breaking has taken place.. She indicated. that Denise is her neighbor and has been waiting for a long- time and is getting really frustrated. Mr. Gibson indicated that they are aware of that and that they have been sensitive about it. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 3 MINUTES — August 24, 2004 1 2 Counsel Boutsis` said to make sure that the ground breaking 3 is noticed at City Hall indicating that all the Commissioners 4 will attend. 5 6 Vice Chair Palmer indicated that a number of people in the 7 community have approached her with a concern about closing down 8 the CRA, and they have asked her as to why she is impeding the 9 process of getting our 95 "percent, so she encouraged them to 10 attend the meetings. She said that six months ago, the Attorney 11 and the Mayor reminded the Director to.get ready on what should 12 be put together so that they could get their plan ready for Dade 13 County. She said that nothing else was said about that issue 14 anymore until this past June when she got a call about an 15 emergency meeting of the CRA. She said that the summer is not 16 the best time for that since most.people are away on vacation, 17 particularly when they had six months to get it done. She said 18 that there is a need for action from staff because the Board 19 does not run the day -to -day operations of the CRA, staff does 20 and that includes the City Manager and the CRA" Director; 21 however, the Board and the Commission are the ones who get the 22 blame. 23 24 Chair Russell said that the City Manager was removed from 25 her_ position as Executive Director when the new Director was 26 hired; therefore she is not in any way responsible for the 27 outcome of the CRA operation. Member Sherar said that he does 28 not believe that is legal. He believes that the Charter provides 29 that the City Manager is responsible for all of the tax money 30 that is spent; moreover, he believes that the CRA By -Laws 31 provide that the Executive Director. is supposed to be the City 32, Manager. Counsel Boutsis said that she would review it and will 33 get back to the Board with that information. 34 35 Member Wiscombe said that the Board had appointed the City 36 Manager as the Executive Director during Mr. Scurr's tenure 37 because of all the changes with directors. 38 39 At this point Mr. Gibson introduced TIFF Coordinator for all 40 CRAB, Mr. Jurgen Teintze. 41 42 Mr. Teintze indicated that the norm is that . all other CRAB 43 in Miami -Dade County are receiving 95 percent. The County, 44 however, has no position on what the TIFF percentage should be. 45 46 Chair Russell indicated that the reality is that increasing 47 the percentage to 95 will impact the taxes of all the taxpayers 48 of South Miami over $300,000. 49 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 4 MINUTES — August 24, 2004 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 After a moment of disruption of the meeting due to a heated discussion over the above issue, Chair Russell brought the meeting back to order. A. Discussion regarding scheduling an attorney client session to discuss strategy and settlement in the following matters: • CRA vs. Aries, 6411 SW 59th Place, Case No.: 01 -21614 CA 23 • CRA vs. Clara Brooks, 6511 SW 59th Court, Case No.: 01 -22356 CA Counsel Boutsis discussed the scheduling for three possible meeting of this type, and Chair Russell asked Counsel to briefly explain the nature and obligations of an attorney- client session, for the benefit of the new members. Counsel Boutsis explained that there are situations when this Board can meet outside of the public forum to discuss current litigation or labor issues. During litigation the Board needs to talk to counsel about the issues and strategies. The meetings start in a public setting, it is announced, and they go into a private session. The entire meeting is transcribed by a court reporter. The settlement and final decision will need to come back in a public forum. Chair Russell indicated that what happens behind those closed doors cannot be discussed with anyone outside of that meeting. It is attorney- client privilege by which they are allowed to hold these meetings outside of the Sunshine Law which governs these meeting, except in those particular cases. They are usually held in the City Manager's office with a court reporter present, and once the case is settled all of the transcripts and records become public, but it has to be settled first. An attorney- client session was then scheduled for Thursday, September 23rd at 6:30 p.m. and the CRA Budget Hearing at 7:00 p.m. B. Selection of CRA Attorney Counsel Boutsis said that she needed some directions from the Board regarding the RFP. The CRA received only two applicants for the position, and one of them did not meet minimum criteria since the. applicant only has two years of experience and our RFP requires ten years. She said that the RFP. also provides that the Board can reject all or part of the bids. That is why she was looking for directions from the Board. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES - August 24, 2004 5 1 Chair Russell indicated that the CRA Director agrees to 2 interview the applicant that met the criteria; therefore she 3 asked the Board as to how they felt about scheduling a joint 4 meeting with this Board and the CRA Advisory Board in order to 5 interview the applicant that met the criteria. 6 7 Member Sherar said that he is not comfortable with having 8 only one applicant. He questioned as to whether the RFP.was 9 advertised and Counsel Boutsis said it did. He said that it seems 10 unusual that only two firms applied. He said that the RFP should 11 be advertised in the Florida Bar News, the Florida Bar Journal 12 and the Broward Edition of the Daily Business Review. He then 13 indicated that he would move to reject all bids and re- advertise. 14 15 Moved by Member Sherar, seconded by Vice Chair Palmer to 16 reject all bids and re- advertise. 17 18 At this time the Board continued to deliver as to whether or 19 not it would be.a good idea to re- advertise, which would prolong 20 the process and perhaps. 21 22 Member Sherar then indicated that even if they advertise and 23 end up with only one applicant again, at least they will know 24 that they did everything that they could. He also said to have an 25 issue I with what was presented in the packet about Mr. Paul and a 26 problem that he had and that this might be a cause for having to 27 reject that application based upon that information. 28 29 At this point Mr. Norman Paul came up to. the podium to 30 introduce himself and request permission from the Chair to 31 respond to Member Sherar's comments. Member Sherar asked him as 32 to whether he had a problem with the Florida Department of 33 Administrative Hearings. Mr. Paul responded that he believed that 34 Member Sherar had misinterpreted what he had read and that he did 35 not know to whom he was referring. Mr. Paul said that he had to 36 correct the record because this was a public meeting. 37 38 Vice Chair Palmer said to Mr. Paul that she had read his 39 packet and that it was impressive. However, in her opinion, the 40 Board has no other options because there is only one applicant. 41 42 Chair Russell indicated that she was willing to go with the 43 CRA Director's recommendation and to schedule an interview, and 44 not to re- advertise. 45 46 With no further comments or discussion, the motion to reject 47 all bids and re- advertise failed by a 3 -4 vote 48 49 Member Wiscombe: Nay 50 Member Cobb: Yea COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 6 MINUTES — August 24, 2004 1 Member Sherar: Yea 2 Member Bryan: Nay 3 Member Birts- Cooper: Nay 4 Chairperson Russell: Nay 5 Vice Chair Palmer: Yea 6 7 Chair Russell then indicated that they should go ahead and 8 schedule the interview process and said that she did not think 9 that they needed to bring the Advisory Board for the interview 10 since it is completely the responsibility of this Board. Mr. 11 Gibson recommended that an hour would be allowed for the 12 interview. 13 14 At this point Counsel Boutsis asked for a motion to reject 15 the other bid. 16 17 Moved by Member -Wiscombe,.seconded- -by Member- -Cobb to reject 18 the other bid. 19 20 Member Sherar said that if they were going to do it this 21 way, then he suggested that they interview the other applicant 22 even though she does not meet the qualifications because they 23 might be surprised. 24 25 Member Wiscombe said that legally they cannot do it after 26 the criteria has been advertised. 27 28 With no further comments or discussion, the motion to reject 29 all the other bids passed by a 5 -2 vote: 30 31 Member Wiscombe: Yea 32 Member Cobb: Yea 33 Member Sherar: Nay 34 Member Bryan: Yea 35 Member Birts - Cooper: Yea 36 Chairperson Russell: Yea 37 Vice Chair Palmer: Nay 38 39 Chair Russell said that they will begin the scheduling 40 process to interview the potential new CRA attorney, and if we 41 find that they do not meet our needs, then we can begin the re- 42 bidding process. 43 44 After a 10 minute - recess, the Board reconvened. 45 46 Member Sherar clarified for the records that Mr. Paul was 47 right. It did not say what he thought it said. 48 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 7 MINUTES — August 24, 2004 ' 1 CONSENT AGENDA a 3 (There are no items) 4 5 RESOLUTION (S) 6 7 CRA 08 -04 -135 8 7. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY 9 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RELATING TO ATTORNEY'S FEES 10 AUTHORIZING TRANSFER OF $18,000.00 FROM THE CRA. CASH 11 CARRYOVER TO CRA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ACCOUNT, ACCOUNT NO: 12 610- 1110 - 564 -31 -20 FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES; PROVIDING AN 13 EFFECTIVE "DATE. 14 15 Moved by Vice Chair Palmer, seconded by Member Bryan to approve 16 this item. 17 18 Counsel Boutsis explained that even though their office.does 19 all the general counsel work, they use another firm to do the 20 Quiet Title work for the City. Quiet Title, she explained, is 21 when you own a piece of property and there are certain issues 22 such as liens against the property or any other problems with the 23 title. 24 25 With no further comments or discussion, the motion to approve 26 this item passed by a 7 -0 vote. 27 28 Member Wiscombe: Yea 29 Member Cobb: Yea 30 Member Sherar: Yea 31 Member Bryan: Yea 32 Member Birts- Cooper: Yea 33 Chairperson Russell:.. Yea 34 Vice Chair Palmer: Yea 35 36 37 CRA 09 -04 -136 .38 8. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY 39 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RELATING TO ATTORNEY'S FEES; APPROVING 40 ATTORNEY'S .FEES FOR NAGIN GALLOP FIGUEREDO, P.A., IN THE 41 AMOUNT OF $12,523.10; CHARGING THE AMOUNT TO ACCOUNT NO. 42 610- 1110 - 564- 31 -20, GENERAL CORPORATE; AND $1,133.70; 43 CHARGING THE AMOUNT TO ACCOUNT NO. 610 -1110- 553- 31 -20, LAND 44 ACQUISITION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 45 46 Moved by Vice Chair Palmer, seconded by Member Sherar to 47 approve this item. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 8 MINUTES — August 24, 2004 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 vote: With no comments or discussion, the motion passed by a 7 -0 Member Wiscombe: Yea Member Cobb: Yea Member Sherar: Yea Member Bryan: Yea Member Birts- Cooper: Yea Chairperson Russell: Yea Vice Chair Palmer: Yea CRA 10 -04 -137 9. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY. OF SOUTH MIAMI- COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RELATING TO ATTORNEY' &FEES; APPROVING ATTORNEY'S FEES FOR LOTT & LEVINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $12,016.95; CHARGING THE AMOUNT TO ACCOUNT NO. 610- 1.110 -564- 31 -20; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Moved by Vice Chair Palmer, seconded by Member Wiscombe to approve this item. With no comments or discussion, the motion passed by a 7 -0 vote. Member Wiscombe: Yea Member Cobb: Yea Member Sherar: Yea Member Bryan: Yea Member Birts- Cooper: Yea Chairperson Russell: Yea Vice Chair Palmer: Yea CRA 11 -04 -138 10.A RESOLUTION OF THE SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RELATING TO THE HIRING OF A CONSULTANT TO ASSIST SMCRA STAFF IN THE PREPARATION OF SUPPLEMENT TO THE SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PLAN; AND SUBSEQUENT SUBMISSION OF SAID SUPPLEMENT'TO MIAMI DADE COUNTY FOR THEIR APPROVAL BEFORE DECEMBER FIRST 1St 2004; THIS SUPPLEMENT WILL IN EFFECT OUTLINE AND DETAIL PROPOSED PROJECTS FOR ANOTHER TEN n.r.,ENT- °- t' YEARS OF EXISTENCE FOR SMCRA; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO DISBURSE $36,000 FROM ACCOUNT 610 -1110- 551 -99 -30 (OTHER USES /ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM/ INDUSTRIAL AREA MASTER PLAN) IN ORDER TO' FUND .THESE SERVICES; AND THE REMAINING BALANCE OF ,$ 88,250 TO BE PAID FROM THE.SMCRA'S BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004 -2005; THE'TOTAL COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES — August 24, 2004 E 1 AMOUNT FOR THESE SERVICES NOT TO EXCEED $124,250.00; 2 PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3 4 Moved by Member Wiscombe, seconded by Vice Chair Palmer to 5 approve this item. 6 7 Mr. Gibson indicated that in 1998, when the SMCRA was adopted, 8 there was some contention within the community in terms of whether we 9 should have a CRA. Consequently, the Board of County Commissioners at 10 the time, in an effort to compromise with the community set some 11 restrictions upon our CRA, such as the 10 percent cap on 12 administrative expenses. which limited the ability to attract quality 13 individuals as well as to have a full staff. The next issue is that 144 this CRA was given a five -year existence and this was quite unusual. 15 He then said that he had included in the Board's packet, an.excerpt 16 -from the Interlocal Agreement which provides that six months prior to 17 the expiration date of the CRA, there should be a plan prepared and. 18 adopted by the County. He then referred to comments made by Vice Chair 19 Palmer on this regard, saying that at the February meeting he was 210 instructed by this Board to prepare the RFQ for a master plan. Among 21 other things, the Board had asked for an itemization of 22 accomplishments of the CRA and documentation that these things were 23 being accomplished. They did prepare an RFP /RFQ, an arduous task that 24 took about two weeks to complete. 25 26 Mr. Gibson then introduced Henry Iler, President of Iler Planning 27 Group. 28 29 Mr. Iler addressed the Board saying that he has a Master in Urban 30 Planning from Florida State University and an' Undergraduate in 31 Business from the University of Florida, and has been in the field for 32 about twenty -five years. Between 1980 -1990, he was with the Planning 33 Department of Miami -Dade County, as well with the County Manager's 34 office. He explained that they are strictly an urban planning firm and 35 that is really all that they,do; they do comprehensive planning, land 36 development codes and community redevelopment plans. Their community 37 redevelopment clients include Florida City with whom they have worked 38 for about ten years. He said that he believes that .Florida City's CRA 39 has the greatest percentage growth in the last ten years of any CRA in 40 the State. Other of their CRA clients is Deerfield Beach, City of 41 Sebastian, Dania Beach, Wilton Manors and Oakland Park. They also have 42 a lot of. experience with the TIFF Committee and staff. 43 44 Chair Russell explained that the resolution basically authorizes 45 the. Executive Director to begin negotiating a contract and then it 46 will come back in detail to the Board. She indicated that at the 47 interview process, the Board asked different questions to all the 48 potential executive directors. The question that she asked was, if 49 they really thought that it would take another thirty years to design 50 and implement what needs to happen in this small CRA. Without COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 10 MINUTES — August 24, 2004 1 exception, each applicant including Mr. Gibson, agreed with me that it 2 would take five years to plan and implement and five years to complete 3 all the Board's goals for the plan. Therefore, Chair Russell said that 4 she would move to amend the resolution to read "for another ten 5 ey ars," because she said that she believes that what needs to be done 6 can be done in ten years. 7 8 Member Sherar said that before he discusses the issue of the 9 renewal of the CRA, he would like to take a trip around the area and 10 see whether or not the CRA is doing what is supposed to be doing with 11 the $3 million over the last five years. He mentioned the time when 12 former Mayor Cathy McCann came before the Board with a presentation of 13 everything that has been done in the CRA area that has nothing -to do 14 with the CRA, specifically, the Habitat for Humanity houses and OCED. 15 He said that both Habitat for Humanity and OCED would be here 16 regardless of the existence of the CRA. He then questioned as to 17 whether we are spending the money the most effectively that we can 18 spent: He said that the CRA has done nothing for the Shops at Sunset. 19 We gave Mr. Preveti $26,000 to fix up a building which may be worth 20 approximately $1 million, and that is an example of the things on 21 which the CRA should not be spending the money. He said that the CRA 22 cannot help social services; it is only for redevelopment. He then 23 mentioned a lot of business in the CRA area such as the Larkins 24 Hospital, the Hotel, the Valencia Apartments, and others, which would 25 exist regardless of the CRA. 26 27 Member Sherar said that the Abraham property is going to be 28 developed regardless of the CRA; and after the Valencia, it is the 29 next biggest piece of property closest to downtown and the University 30 of Miami. This $200 million project (referring to the Codina future 31 development) , half of that money is not to be going to the City; 32 however, this City is going to spend one- hundred percent of the money 33 needed for police,-for green space, and for all other services. 34 35 Member Sherar then referred to Progress Lane which-is functioning 36 almost at one - hundred percent capacity, with car repair shops and 37 more; however, the CRA has not done a single thing for that area. He 38 said that nobody in that area is aware that they can apply for OCED 39 grants. 40 41 He then referred to the post office and the Mobley building which 42 are not going anywhere. - Neither is Lee Park, the Senior Center, J.R.E. 43 Lee School, the health center; if neither of these is going to be 44 knocked down and rebuilt, then, they should be taken off the list. 45 46 About South Miami Gardens, he showed the "Vision of The SMCRA 47 Multifamily Housing Study" for which the CRA paid $65,000. He then 48 pointed out that St. Albany's Preschool which is located in the center 49 of the proposed project, will be knocked down, even though it is an 50 important part of the community. He said that we do not need to knock COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1 1 MINUTES — August 24, 2004 1 down our preschool to redevelop our community. He also referred to the 2 RM -18 where apartment buildings are.now. 3 4 He continued by saying that the shopping areas in the south side 5 of town need to be developed, as well as the light industrial areas. 6 Madison Square according to this plan is supposed to be housing, he 7 indicated, and can be developed by Habitat for Humanity. 8 9 We can have one director of development, Member Sherar continued, 10 who would take care of everything for us. He said that there is one 11 thing that it is allowed in the CRA plan which could have really 12 helped the people in the CRA area. The plan says that we are to 13 provide a work study program for college students that are residents 14 of the CRA so that they can work for the CRA and help the CRA. 15 16 Member Sherar said that all these things that he has said tonight 17 are the reason for which he is opposed to the continuation of the CRA. 18 He believes that in the long run, we can spend the money much more 19 efficiently. If the City Manager gets the development department, 20 whose responsibility and goal is to develop the whole town, we can do 21 it for less than $3 million in five years. 22 23 Chair Russell said that Member. Sherar raised some good points. 24 She said that Miami Gardens can go ahead with community input, and 25 also Madison Square. She said that the CRA is a symbol of hope for 26 this community and that she believes it is the only CRA that began 27 from the people up, not as the rest of the CRAs in the State which 28 began from the administration down. It has been a dream and something 29 that I have supported since before I came in the Commission, and the 30 only person that has been in the Commission the entire time that the 31 CRA has existed, she added. She said that she is a Miami native and 32 proud of it. She went over all the efforts put into the CRA; the money 33 they were able to bring from Tallahassee; money they were able to 34 obtain from the different agencies and grants, OCED, City 35 contribution, and CAA's input and assistance in getting OCED to fund 36 us, and with all of that we were able to build the Community Center, 37 which is a state -of- the -art facility; is one of the finest facilities 38 of its kind in the State. This Commission made it a point to insist 39 that a portion of all the jobs go to our residents, and we have tried. 40 She said that even though this discussion is .not on the Agenda 41 tonight, that it is important to have it because there is a- lot of 42 reaction to Member Sherar's statements being viewed as anti -CRA; but 43 it should not be viewed as anti - community. She said that she thought 44 it would be important to share some similar thoughts from a different 45 perspective and attempt to be fair about it. 46 47 Chair Russell continued.by saying that she would like to schedule 48 some sort of a workshop open for public hearing so that they can hear 49 everybody's thoughts on what direction they need to take with this. 50 She said that she does not believe that the CRA needs to be in COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 12 MINUTES — August 24, 2004 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 existence for twenty -five more years. She said that they will need James. They will also need Joe, who has established a connection with developers and residents, has brought everybody together and with whom the community has a lot of confidence and trust. She said that both James and Joe could be a valuable component of what they do next, but that this is not her decision. It will be up to the City Manager who has been talking about an office of economic development. She said that she wants what is best for everybody. Not what is best for developers. She said that it is important to encourage the people to stay here and become homeowners, securing the future for future generations,' and. that should be a priority. She said that when we start talking about not having a CRA people perceive that we do not want 'to do anything, and we have proven that this is not the case at all. She then asked that they schedule a town hall form of public meeting with residents of the CRA so that may hear from everybody. Chair Russell said that in the meantime, she would move an amendment to this resolution, line 10, to change from "twenty fi: yea-r-s" to "ten years." Moved by Chairperson Russell, seconded by Vice Chair Palmer, to amend line 10 of the resolution to read "ten years." Member Birts- Cooper said that she keeps hearing that we do not need the CRA to do� certain things. She then asked, why all of these years we have not done certain things. We have built some Habitat houses, but as far as doing other things in different areas, such as with parks, that has been neglected for years. She said that perhaps the problem has been with all the changes that have taken place with the administration. She said that the first director spent, lots of money on consulting and nothing got done. She also said that how can this CRA work when having members on the Board that are fighting against it. She said that to be on this Board, Commissioners must pull off their hats. Member Wiscombe said that when he first came on this Commission, he was the one that forced the issue about Mr. Delaney at that time and the amount of money that was being wasted. He said that the CRA, in his opinion, has been a catalyst for the Commissioners to do things for a part of the community that has been neglected for a long time.. Finally somebody stood up, former Mayor Price, and said that we needed to do something. He indicated that he agrees with Chair Russell in terms of the length of time needed to achieve the CRA dream and goals, and that he wished to be able to accomplish that far before twenty - five years. However, this is not going to happen unless they have a master plan and the goals to do the things that they. need to do. He said that the community was lacking in many different areas with regard to infrastructure and that a good amount of that has been rectified, and he believes that we are going in the right direction. He said that many things have been done but that we can do far more. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 13 MINUTES — August 24, 2004 1 About South Miami Gardens, Member Wiscombe said that there had been a 2 big workshop which they attended, adding that there is now a sense.of 3 direction that they did not have with any of the previous directors. 4 He said that even though there is no need for extending the CRA for 5 twenty -five years, the CRA does serve a purpose in this community. 6 Moreover, it gives the residents the hope. for the first time that 7 somebody in this City is paying-attention to do the right thing for 8 all of the community. He concurred with Chair Russell that we need a 9 workshop .going and bring people back to the table again so that all 10 concerns can'be laid out and resolved. 11 12 Member Bryan then asked as to whether anyone has thought about 13 why they were seating here tonight..She said that she lives in the CRA 14 area and not once for the.past five years she has been notified about 15 'the CRA. She said that Mr: Gibson did not create the problems that.the 16 CRA may have simply because he has not been here long enough. She also 17 said that she does not believe that we need twenty -five years because 18 the area is so small. With twenty -five years you run into the problem 19 of becoming stagnated. She said that five or ten years should be 20 sufficient, not twenty -five years. 21 22 Counsel Boutsis then indicated that since the voice that she has 23 heard from this Board so far has to do with, the issues about the 24 existence of the CRA, its plan and goals; that this is the reason for 25 which they should hire a consultant so that he could create the plan 26 for them. She then referred to the consultant's agreement attached to 27 the resolution,. specifically to the Scope of Services, under Task 2, 28 which provides for approximately a 20 -day timeframe for the 29 preliminary draft of a plan. She then suggested that perhaps in 30 conjunction with that 20 -day time period they could schedule the 31 workshop. We can go over the draft and have ,a discussion with the 32 community. She said that the workshop should be properly noticed so 33 that the community is aware of what is going on and also provide their 34 input to the Board. 35 36 With regard to Member Birts- Cooper's comments, Chair Russell said 37 that the members of the City Commission sit in this Board because that 38 is the way that our Interlocal Agreement with the County was drafted; 39 but that can be amended. She said that they can remove themselves from 40 this Board and determine what the requirements for membership are but 41 that has to be done during- the time we negotiate the Interlocal with 42 the County. The County has to give the final approval, and she said 43 that she would be perfectly willing to step down and let someone else 44 with more experience or more time, or a different perspective to take 45 her seat, but that cannot be done until they go through the proper 46 procedure with the County. She explained that the Consultant is going 47 to prepare for them the plan to go to the County for an extension. We 48 can tie all of the projects with a timeframe and that is a very good 49 idea. 50 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 14 MINUTES August 24, 2004 1 Mr. Iler indicated that the CRA is the only real effective 2 redevelopment tool available to local governments', providing resources 3 for infrastructure. It is for using money; it does not raise anybody's 4 tax rate; the tax rate in the CRA is the same as.the rest of the City. 5 He explained that this is money that if it were not for the CRA, the 6 money would go to Miami -Dade County and they would spend it at their 7 discretion, and probably not a whole lot in South Miami. Therefore, 8 this is a way to recapture residents' money and bring it -back to our 9 community. 10 11 With no further comments or discussion, the motion to amend this 12 item passed by a 7 -0 vote. 13 14 Member Wiscombe: Yea 15 Member-Cobb: Yea 16 Member Sherar: Yea 17 Member Bryan: Yea 18 Member Birts- Cooper: Yea 19 Chairperson Russell: Yea 20 Vice Chair Palmer: Yea 21 22 Member Sherar. asked as to why they are doing this without 23 competitive bidding. 24 25 Mr. Gibson indicated that he would answer the question posed by 26 Member Sherar but that he needed to provide some background. This CRA, 27 in 1998, was a compromised CRA. What we are witnessing here tonight, 28 he said, is another version of a compromised CRA. He said that there 29 has been little continuity due to the changes in directors since the 30 CRA was created. Another obstacle has been the administrative cap 31 which has limited staff; he has been in this position a short period 32 of time and has had to expedite this process, but obviously the 33 decision has been made. 34 35 At this point Chair Russell asked Counsel Boutsis to explain the 36 bidding process under _these circumstances. 37 38 Counsel Boutsis explained that for expenditures above $5,000, 39 there are certain procedures that need to be followed. However, there 40 is an exception to the rule as far as bidding, RFPs and RFQs, which 41 apply to an emergency -type situation provided that it is well 42 documented by staff showing the rationale for it. Because of the 43 exceptional criteria, there are very few people who can do this kind 44 of job. They are also racing against a deadline which is about four 45 months away for providing a proposed amendment to the Interlocal 46 revised plan to the County for approval; therefore, we have the 47 justification to go forward. The RFP process takes too long to do it 48 at this point. 49 50 Member Sherar moved to table the resolution upon completion of COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 15 MINUTES — August 24, 2004 1 publication for competitive bidding on the RFP. The motion died for 2 Tack of .second. 3 4 Chair Russell answered Vice Chair Palmer's question relating to 5 the proposed consultant's fee, by referring to Section 1 of the 6 resolution. 7 8 Mr. Iler then explained that approximately $94,000 is for the 9 preparation of the plan between now and December 1St, or whenever the 10 contract goes into effect. Also, there is a period of time during the 11 County review process through the TIFF committee, they sometimes ask 12 for supplemental data, and then there are still other County 13 committees, and they also have to go to several meetings of'the County 14 Commission. It is a process that takes approximately six to seven 15 months. During that period of. time they work on the Interlocal .16 pertaining to the length of the CRA, the tax increment,. which he said 1.7 that_ they will be pushing for a higher increment, as well as other 18 issues. 19 20 Chair Russell said that as far as the tax increment, this will be 21 determined during the negotiation process and it is up to this Board 22 and that is not a given yet. 23 24 Member Sherar said that this is why they need competitive 25 bidding. The City's contribution to the CRA is approximately $400,000. 26 and the consultant's fee represents twenty -five percent of it. 27 28 With no further comments or discussion, the motion to approve 29 this item as amended passed by a 6 -1 vote. 30 31 Member Wiscombe: Yea 32 Member Cobb: Yea 33 Member Sherar: Nay 34 Member Bryan: Yea 35 Member Birts- Cooper: Yea 36 Chairperson Russell: Yea 37 Vice Chair Palmer: Yea 38 39 40 PUBLIC COMMENTS 41 42 David Tucker Sr. referred to the changes in the direction of 43 the CRA. He. said to the Board that they must have a vision and 44 put it down in concrete letters because if they put'it in ink it 45 will wash away. 46 47 Former Mayor Dr. Anna Price said that it was thirty years 48 ago that Spike Gibson came to her with the idea of building a 49 multipurpose center. That is twenty -five years before we broke COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 16 MINUTES - August 24, 2004 1 ground, and that is to put some things in perspective. She then 2 congratulated the Board for voting for the CRA. The most exciting 3 thing about the CRA is the commitment of a City to itself. It is 4 also an effort to empower a community. A community in which I 5 live, and which has been neglected for over five years, maybe 6 fifty. Five years of the CRA, five directors —a program for 7 failure. The CRA provides an entity that supercedes any elected 8 official. I am here to testify, she continued, that elected 9 officials come and go. A CRA with a firm infrastructure and 10 support can remain to continue to empower this community, it is 11 not separate, it is a part of the community which has been 12 neglected for over fifty years, let's give it an opportunity. 13 This is not doing something for the poor people or for the black 14 people, this is something for empowering South Miami that is not 15 what the CRA is about. We don't need paternalistic approaches. We 16 need to be empowered. She then said that James Brown had a song 17 that said: "I don't want nobody to give me nothing, just open up 18 the door and we'll get it ourselves. 19 20 Reverend Russell Harris, Pastor of Mount Olive Church, 21 addressed the Board referring to the discussion tonight about the 22 continuation of the CRA. He said he has worked in South Miami for 23 the last fourteen years. He said that how can anyone expect 24 anything to grow and prosper when you. only give it fifty - percent 25 of the funding that everyone else is receiving. He commended the 26 Board for holding on to the Mobley property. He then mentioned 27 the pool, saying that whoever is not for the CRA should resign 28 from the CRA Board. He said that they want a pool. He then said 29 that he would like to invite this Board to his Church where he 30 will personally cook a meal for everybody, and then he would like 31 to take them for a walk and tour with him and with people who 32 live in the area, so that they can appreciate why the CRA is 33 needed. 34 35 Shaunte Wells said that she has been a member of this 36 community for the past twenty -six years. She said that during all 37 the discussion tonight she did not hear any clear explanation 38 about the 'need for the time extension of the CRA. She said that 39 there must be valid reasons for requesting the twenty -five year 40 extension; therefore, she said that she would like to hear this 41 explanation from the Director. She also, asked who is going to 42 make sure that the Madison Square project happens if there is no 43 CRA. Who will be there to be held accountable? She said that she 44 does not know of very many agencies that are going to give us 45 funding for something that it is only going to be around only 46 five to ten years. 47 48 Chair. Russell explained that initial funding to the Madison 49 Square if any is required will be just that, initial funding and 50 no ongoing funding from the CRA at .all. The.reason for ten years COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 17 MINUTES — August 24, 2004 1 is because that is what every single qualified person that we 2 interviewed for this position of Executive Director agreed with.a 3 maximum required to implement what the task is and get it done, 4 and that will take five years to plan and begin implementation 5 and five years to complete implementation. And that is where the 6 ten -year term comes from. 7 8 Ms. Wells then asked if any research has been done to 9 compare with areas of similar parameters. 10 11 Chair Russell explained that the only comparisons of that 12 nature that have been done are primarily commercial CRAs. 13 14 Yvonne Beckman said that she has been quite involved with 15 the CRA. She then referred to the comment made that the money 16 would not come back to the City. The money does come back to the 17 City, she said. A fair amount of the money, equally divided from 18 the County does come back to the City and goes into its general 19 coffers. Therefore, there will be more money for the entire 20 community. Also, about the-plan, she said that there is already a 21 CRA plan. She said that she thinks that "we are putting the cart 22 before the horse;" we do not have the five -year evaluation which 23 was due in January of this year. She then urged the Board to look 24 at the evaluation, and look at the science behind all of this. 25 Also, hiring a consultant it probably requires an amendment to 26 the plan. She said that she is also against the CRA, and that 27 there should be a place for Mr. McCants and Mr. Gibson in the 28 City, to have them to continue to do what they have been doing 29 for 'the entire City. That will make the community whole again. 30 She said that the community is too polarized as it is. 31 32 Worrell. Troup, owner of Princeton Childcare and 33 Kindergarten. He started his business ten years ago and said that 34 the CRA has been a great support to him. With the help of the CRA 35 funds he has been able to upgrade and increase the capacity of 36 his students from thirty to fifty kids. He said that those funds 37 are needed. He said that all of this cost him about $45,000. The 38 CRA was supposed to match that amount but he only received 39 $12,000. He also invited the Board to come and visit his school. 40 41 Chair Russell told Mr. Troup that this is the first time 42 that she hears of his disappointment. This was never brought up 43 to the attention of the Board and now is too late to remedy. She 44 also said that what he has done so far is wonderful and that they 45 are proud to have him in South Miami. 46 47 Member Sherar said that Mr. Troup should have received the 48 money that he was originally promised. He .reiterated that this is 49 what he means. He said that rather than putting $400,000 into the 50 Mobley building which is sitting there rotting, he rather gives COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 18 MINUTES — August 24, 2004 1 it to people such as Mr. Troup who is in the business of 2 educating people. 3 4 Antoniette Owens, a grant recipient in the amount of 5 approximately $4,700 for the purpose of fixing her home, said 6 that she was glad even when she needed to .come up with the 7 difference because this was for her place, and that the way her 8 place looks reflects on her and her family. She then spoke for 9 Ms. Scavella, an elderly neighbor whose home has been left 10 unfinished. 11 12 Mr. McCants said that they have just granted Ms. Scavella 13 funding to complete the process through the CRA. He also said 14 that he believes that the CRA is needed. He indicated that if all 15 those who have been benefited in some way or another by the CRA 16 were here, this room would be full. 17 18 Levy Kelly spoke in reference to Member Sherar's 19 presentation saying that he had done an excellent job in getting 20 prepared for his presentation; however, he said that he totally 21 disagrees with his analysis. There is definitely room for growth 22 and improvement within the boundaries of the CRA area. We have to 23 look at those areas without a prejudice eye. We have to 24 understand the need of the community; we need . economic 25 development; we need additional housing; we need to think outside 26 of the box in order to get things done, and unless we have a CRA 27 which has been hampered by so many with ridiculous information 28 sometimes, and also by the attacks that are taking place by 29 members of this Board, then, we are going to continue five. years 30 from now at a standstill. He said that a ten -year certain is not 31 enough. It has been over fifty years for anyone to even pay 32 attention to this community. 33 34 Sharon McCain said that if we take the CRA away, how we can 35 promise the people in this area that it will be developed. She 36 said that the way she sees it, is as if we were really starting 37 the CRA right now, with somebody that the people can trust. 38 Therefore, if we are going to hire a consultant who is an urban 39 planner, he would be the one who can best .determine how long it 40 would take to complete the goals of the CRA. She then asked if 41 the "ten- year" amendment can be changed. She also said that all 42 of the African - American community needs to come to the budget 43 meetings to find out where their tax dollars are going and also 44 to express an opinion. 45 46 Josephine Anderson said that so far she has not heard any 47 discussion tonight about economic development in terms of how we 48 can spend some of our money in our own communit . She said that 49 she did not hear anything about the site on 64t Street between 50 59th Place and 59th Court, and she asked if there are any plans to COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 19 MINUTES — August 24, 2004 1 put something there to generate taxes for their community. She 2 said that she would like to see that part of South Miami to look 3 dike this part of South Miami where she is standing now. She is 4 also of the opinion that twenty -five years are necessary for.the 5 CRA to complete its goals. 6 7 Adrian Ellis spoke. about the make -up of the CRA Board to 8' which he said he has opposed for many years. He said that 'in his 9 opinion the Board should be composed of professionals, business 10 owners and residents from that' area, all of whom would be geared 11 towards the CRA's economic development. He said that, just as 12 other speakers have'put it, the community has been neglected for 13 over fifty years, therefore ten more years will not be sufficient 14 to bring it up to the.standards of'the- rest of the City.' He then 15 urged the Board to.*renew the CRA. 16 17 Sarah Tompkins said that even though she does not live in 18 the CRA area, that area is very dear to her heart because that is 19 where she was born. She said that the CRA has existed for five 20 years but it is in the past six months that she has seen some 21 real changes taking place, and thanked the Board for their 22 support. She said that empowerment means bringing in the 23 resources so that people can help themselves; it means that 24 people can get away from social services. Therefore,' she said 25 that it is her dream to see Madison Square Town Center 26 development with businesses coming there, not homes. We need more 27 businesses on this side of town. She then urged everybody to 28 patronize the Madison Square Saturdays. She also said that hiring 29 a consultant to help with the preparation of the plan to take to 30 the County is a good idea. 31 32 With no further comments this session was closed. 33 34, 35 BARD COMMENTS c1 37 Member Wiscombe thanked the community for the turnout, and 38 said that all voices as far as he is-concerned will be heard. He 39 said that they should all come together to get the job done. 40 41 Member Sherar said that nobody in the CRA area is worried 42 about their water because nobody there is on a well, they have 43 potable water. He said that he lives near Palmer Park and nothing 44 has been done to improve, that park. Whereas we just spent over 45 $12,000 on swing sets for Lee. Park. He said that .he will not 46 allow for St. Alban's to disappear. He said that the CRA is 47 supposed to take two people that are college students and 48 residents of 'South Miami, give them money from the CRA and put COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 2 0 MINUTES — August 24, 2004 1 them on a work -study program. He said that people put him in this 2 position to be the caretaker of the public's money. He said that. 3 he wants development in that community just the same as he wants 4 it anywhere else, because the more houses that go in there, the 5 more businesses that go in there .and in turn that will help to 6 lighten his tax burden and everybody else's tax burden. He said 7 that the $3.6 million that has been spent in the last five years 8 has done nothing to increase the tax base of this community. He 9 said that if the CRA .were economical viable, it would have 10 resulted in $3 million worth of increase in property value in the 11 CRA area. We are not going to get any of that money back because 12 it is `form over substance.' He said that he would meet with 13 anyone that wants to meet with him, but at the end of his term he 14 is not going to sit there and say that he spent $3.6 million in 15 five years and the only thing that he has to show for is 16 consultant fees. 17 18 Member Cobb • asked as to the process of using their 19 discretionary account if they wish to assist anyone in the area. 20 Chair Russell indicated that James and Joe could assist her with 21 that and show her how it works. Chair Russell said that the money 22 could be spent on any plan item, either commercial or residential 23 within the CRA area; staff then brings a resolution to the Board 24 for approval. Chair Russell noted as an example, when they all 25 contributed a portion to buy an awning for the playground at St. 26 Alban's. Member Cobb also urged the residents to come out more 27 often and get involved with the issues that concern them. Also, 28 to come and request information so that they can read it 29 themselves or have the proper member of staff explain to them 30 what they do not understand, instead of going around wondering 31 what is going on. 32 33 Member Birts- Cooper thanked everybody for coming to the 34 meeting. 35 36 Vice Chair Palmer said that a lot has been said tonight but 37 that it is needed. She also urged everybody to try to be here at 38 these meetings. She also said that she hopes that they get the 39 workshop going. 40 41 Chair Russell also thanked everyone, particularly Mr. Iler 42 for staying through the. whole meeting which shows his dedication 43 to our CRA and to the process. She then said that if instead of 44 spending.$3 million on consultants and wages, and things that did 45 not really benefit the residents of this community; the money 46 would have been distributed among 150 people, giving $20,000 47 each, all of those people could be homeowners now. .On the 48 business component, she said that the CRA is primarily an 49 economic redevelopment engine.. Economic redevelopment comes in 50 two ways, the residential component and the commercial component; COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 2 1 MINUTES — August 24, 2004 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 that is why there is a great deal of validity to the proposed Madison Square project -a business hub in the heart of the community. She said that $3 million would have gone a long way in a lot of down payment for a lot of people. She said that she'was not born fifty years ago, but that in the five years that she has been here she has worked very hard, in the City, in Tallahassee and as far as Washington DC, to make sure that we got some of those things done, CRA or no CRA. We did not have a CRA in place when we went asking for money for the Multipurpose Center for Phase I. This thing happened because that is what the community wants and because there was a group of people up here who listened, Chair Russell said. $3 million could mean a lot of down payment on a lot of homes, she reiterated. And if the City could build a 20 -unit condominium, allowing people then to come in and take ownership of each unit; a condominium with rules and regulations, so that people behave themselves, with no drugs or loud noises, being respectful of one another. Then every people .in those units will be homeowners. She said that she supported the CRA from the beginning, and she supports continuing the work of economic development. She said that she is not thinking of the community in the box. She is thinking of the community outside of the box. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before this Body,, the meeting was adjourned at 10:20 p.m. Approved: Attest: Maria M. Menendez CRA Secretary COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 22 MINUTES — August 24, 2004 Mary Scott Russell CRA Chairperson 1 2 3 5 6 7 9 10 W 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 DRAFT smcp.A SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCYMINUTES JULY 291 2004 CALL TO ORDER: The South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency met in regular session on Thursday, July 29, 2004 beginning at 6:07 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, 6130 Sunset Drive. 1. ROLL CALL: The following members of the CRA Board were present: Chairperson Mary Scott Russell, Vice 'Chair Velma Palmer and Members Marie Birts - Cooper,. Craig Z. Sherar, Nancy Cobb and Viola Bryan. Member Randy G. Wiscombe was absent. Also in attendance were: CRA General Council Eve Boutsis, CRA Director -Joseph Gibson, CRA Secretary Representative Nkenga Payne and CRA Program Coordinator James McCants. 2. INVOCATION: Invocation was conducted in silence. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison. ITEMS FOR TIME BOARD'S CONSIDERATION: 4. Approval*o£ Minutes a) May 13, 2004, Moved by Member Sherar, seconded by Member Birts- Cooper, the motion to defer the minutes passed by a 5 -0 vote. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES - July 29, 2004 Member Wiscombe: Member Cobb: Member Sherar: Member Bryan: Member Birts- Cooper: Chairperson Russell: Vice Chair Palmer: 1 Absent Out of the Room Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea 1 5. Special Presentation 2 3 I. Rose Hudson Mincey (Executive Director) Universal 4 Truth Community Development Corporation, Inc. 5 (Affordable Housing) 6 7 Ms. Mincey, after being introduced by Mr. Gibson, addressed 8 the Board about their Homebuyer Education Workshop which 9 primarily serves two goals: First, it helps to familiarize first - 10 time homebuyers with the process of home buying; the second 11 important goal is that it introduces the first -time homebuyers to 12 the players in the industry. The outcome of the program is to get 13 people pre - qualified and get them into a home. They walk them 14 from the beginning to the end of the process. She also indicated 15 that they handle approximately 100 attendees in their monthly 16 seminars. Ms. Mincey continued to outline the numerous services 17 they provide. 18 19 Ms. Mincey then responded to various questions from the 20 Board. She indicated that this is a free service, with a minimum_ 21 fee for the credit report; the organization has been in existence 22 since 1994. Mr. McCants said that the annual fee to handle the 23 credit report and.to get the applicants ready is approximately 24 $2,000. He then added that the proposal will be coming back to 25 the Board in the form of a resolution for their approval. 26 27 II. Special Recognition 28 Michael Miller- Miller Publishing 29 - Alvaro Santistevan- South Miami Times 30 31 Mr. Gibson referred to Mr. Miller as one of the pillars of 32 this community. Mr. Miller does not make a lot of noise about 33 what he is doing, Mr. Gibson said. He recalled the 1994 Charrette 34 where Mr. Miller provided printing services at no cost. He also 35 printed the CRA Newsletter at no cost. He is a very quiet, 36 generous person, Mr. Gibson added. 37 38 Mr. Miller addressed the Board by saying that he considers 39 an honor to do something for the City. He considers it not an 40 obligation but a pleasure to do it. 41 42 About Mr. Santisteban, Mr. Gibson said that he seems to have 43 a kin insight of the CRA. He has written several articles about 44 the SMCRA, pointing out one article that he wrote for the month 45 of July covering the Madison Square Saturdays, thereby serving as 46 good exposure to get the word out at no cost to the CRA. 47 48 III. Madison Square Town Center (Phase I)' 49 A. Carlos Casuscelli 50 51 Mr. Gibson indicated that Mr. Casuscelli probably needs no 52 introduction. He has been part of the team that conducted a 53 charrette type of project in the Commerce Lane area, and will be COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 2 MINUTES - July 29, 2004 1 reporting on studies he has been doing on the Madison S.quare 2 mixed use project. 3 4- Mr. Casuscelli said that he has been following up on the 5 work that he started last year with the students and he now have 6 it in written form. The students will be coming back soon but in 7 the meantime he wanted to share with the Board some of the things 8 that can be dome in that specific site. The renderings have been 9 on display at Madison Square Saturdays to show the community what 10 type of construction will be discussed in the future. The project 11 includes an open courtyard similar to the one at Cocowalk. The 12 idea behind the whole project is to have a place conducive of 13 people gathering there. They will provide different models to 14 choose from for everyone to review and decide which one is best 15 for the community. 16 17 Mr. Casuscelli indicated that he is an architect, a 18 professor, of architecture, with a private university, and a 19' 'counselor of 600,000 architects throughout the continent. This 20 was in response to Vice Chair Palmer's inquiry. 21 22 6. CRA Director's Report: 23 24 I. Hometown Station 25 Mr. Gibson first referred to a meeting they attended at 26 Public Works where they shared the concerns they had relating to 27 this project. They want to make sure that local contractors are 28 given priority to participate in this project. He said that the 29 CRA was instrumental in recommending some local professionals for 30 the Valencia project and the results were very positive with no 31 complaints relating to performance or products used; and`Mr. Bob 32 Miller, President of First Florida was extremely pleased with the 33 quality of workers from this area. Another concern of the CRA had 34 to do with possible street closing. One of the businesses that 35 would be immediately impacted with this is the Great Western 36 Hotel. 37 38- Chairperson Russell said that she had been. discussing this 39 very issue with the City Manager, about rerouting traffic 40 specially during construction, and that a traffic study was 41 requested from the project managers that are there already so 42 that we would know what the impact is going to be during 43 construction, before we grant any permits to close any of our 44 streets or narrow the rights -of -way. 45- 46 As per affordable housing consideration according to the 47 Comprehensive Plan, Mr. Gibson continued, there is a request from 48 the City that in phasing off the construction, affordable housing 49 be given consideration. He said that we need to make sure that 50 affordable' housing is included within this particular project. 51 Mr. Gibson said that the mission of the CRA is to ensure that 52 this City is built up in complete balanced perspective and Church COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 3 MINUTES - July 29, 2004 Street is an example of that. balance that they are trying to accomplish. Member Sherar, said that one of the reasons why he and a group of people were in favor of this. project is because it was not presented as a phase in project—He said that they are going to build that office building, which they told us that there were going to be on our tax base, and now he is hearing that they are going to rent it to the County and that it is not going to be on the tax base? Chairperson Russell said that this issue will be dealt with at the Commission level. Member Sherar then continued saying that in fact affordable housing is a big component, but it is also a big problem, and the CRA needs to get behind it. and get this project looking the way it is supposed to be looking. He said that there are measures that may be taken, such as having the. contractor-posting a $1 million bond to make sure that this project is going to be built. Chairperson Russell explained that this project is still in its conceptual stages but they are not ready to break ground yet, they are just lining up a construction and permitting schedule. It was approved by the County because of its transit designation and it has been around for about five years. She said that she asked the Manager to bring them to speed on the results of the meeting with staff and the representatives from Hometown Inca It is complicated and different from anything that we have handled before because of the merger with the County and a big construction around the transit station, she continued, and it will probably-be a good idea to schedule a workshop with all of the Board "to.bring everybody up to speed with this project. II. South Miami Gardens Survey (update) A. Richard Miller, Consultant Mr. Gibson introduced Consultant Richard Miller who presented an overview of the results from a new South Miami Gardens Survey. He said that. this new survey which was conducted this past May, indicates that about 52 percent for 25 of the 48 families of the household that were there, were in favor of the project. There were also some people that did not want to participate in the survey. Mr. Miller said that as a whole, the recent survey shows that the .majority of residents still favor the development of the plan and that they understand the process. At this time, he indicted, that the housing agency has changed leaderships and the former executive director has retired and the former deputy director is now the interim executive director. He then said that as soon as everybody come together in favor.of the project, including this .Board and the County Commissioner for this district, then the Board of County Commissioners will be notified, who will. in turn involve the housing .agency staff to proceed with what is necessary to bring this about. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 4 MINUTES - July 29, 2004 1 , 2 Mr. Miller then said that St. Alban's Daycare is not 3 included in the area, in response to Member Cobb's question. 4 5 Member Sherar said that St. Alban's Daycare, in one of the 6 conceptual drawings, is shown as knocked down and Mr. Miller 7 responded that he is not aware of that at all. 8 9 Member Sherar then asked Mr. Miller as to how they are going 10 to guarantee that after those buildings are demolished that 11 affordable housing, in fact, will be in there. Mr. Miller 12 indicated that this would be part of the responsibility of the 13 Miami -Dade Housing Agency to make sure that it happens, and that 14 will be included in the overall plan. Mr. Miller said that part 15 of what is involved in this process is that there has to be an 16 approval from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development 17 (HUD) before any resident can be relocated, or before a building 18 can be torn down. Since HUD is going to be involved in providing 19 some sort of subsidy, they are going to make sure that this thing 20 happens. There is also a law which deals with issues relating to 21 people who are displaced by government action, particularly, a 22 public housing resident. 23 24 Member Bryan asked Mr. Miller as to whether he has copies of 25 the signed surveys from the residents and he said that he does. 26 She then said that a lot of the people are saying that they are 27 concerned with the rent as to whether it will be affordable. Mr. 28 Miller said that those were isolated comments, and not all of the 29 residents are saying that. 30 31 Chairperson Russell then directed Mr. Gibson to get two 32 things for all members of the Board: that he responds to Member 33 Sherar's request for copies of the signed plans; and, also a copy 34 of the residents' surveys attached to that for each Board member. 35 36 About the concern on the rent issue Mr. Miller added that 37 the residents were told very specifically that if they were going 38 to move into the public housing. units, that they would pay, no 39 more in rent than what they are paying right now. The only reason 40 for which they would be paying more rent would depend on their 41 income. This is by law, and it is roughly 25 percent of their 42 salary. 43 44 Member Sherar reiterated his concern about the possible 45 demolition of St. Alban's Daycare Center as shown on the 46 conceptual plans. Mr. Miller said that St. Alban's is not part of 47 the South Miami Gardens development. Chairperson Russell 48 indicated that perhaps the Board should take a look at what staff 49 has and that this issue will be addressed.in a different type of 50 format. 51 52 III. RFP /Q SMCRA Legal Services 53 A. Deadline 7/29/04 54 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 5 MINUTES - July 29, 2004 1 Mr. Gibson indicated that they had received two proposals 2 from legal firms in response to the REF /Q: 3 4 Louise R. Caro, Esq.; and 5 Weiss Serota Helfman Pastoriza Guedes Cole e& Boniske, P.A. 6 7 IV. Rambo Home Closing 8 A. 6/23 9 10 Mr. Gibson announced that the Rambo family has already moved 11 into their home.and that is very good news. 12 13 Ms. Rambo addressed the Board with some emotional and 14 grateful words. She said that the home is beautiful and 15 comfortable and invited the Board to come and check it out. 16 17 V. Website update 18 A. Agenda 19 20 Mr. Gibson announced that they will be updating their 21 website with the assistance of MIS Manager Gremaf Reyes. Among 22 other things, they will now be posting the CRA Agenda on a 23 regular basis. He said that Mr. Reyes is another one of our 24 `unsung' heroes in the midst and he has been very accommodating 25 and helpful with them, Mr. Gibson added. 26 27 VI. Madison Square Saturday Update 28 Mr. Gibson referred to the Madison Square Saturday project 29 as an overwhelming success. He then commended Mr. McCants for his 30 hard work and enthusiasm and for helping to make this project a 31 reality. He then quoted Alvaro Santistevan who referred to the 32 project by saying that "this is a transitional stepping stone." 33 Mr. Gibson indicated that they have some vendors from the area 34 who are doing some very good business, and who need to be taken 35 to the next level, to a business incubator. 36 37 Mr. McCants, adding to Mr. Gibson's words regarding Madison 38 Square Saturdays said that they have a very good team put 39 together as far as the vendors are concerned. They also have the 40 Department of Elections there assisting with the registration of 41 new voters. 42 43 Mr. Gibson also indicated that City Manager Maria Davis has 44 been extremely helpful assisting them behind the scenes, 45 particularly by announcing it at the City Commission meetings. 46 47 With no further comments or discussion the CRA Director's 48 Report was closed. 49 50 6. CRA General Counsels Report: 51 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT, AGENCY 6 MINUTES - .July.29, 2004 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 Counsel Boutsis indicated that she has provided to each of the Board Members with status of the CRA foreclosures and quiet title actions. For the next meeting she will be putting on the Agenda a resolution on item no. 11 which is the CRA versus Rosa Lee Jackson at 1690 SW' 63rd Street. She said that she would like to be able to purchase the tax certificates back for the owners through the County Appraiser's office and this involves certain procedure which she will follow. I. Leroy Taylor and Aries Properties update II. Update of Greater Miami Neighborhoods Properties Counsel Boutsis then referred to item no. 9 which is Aries Insurance. She said that she would like to discuss this other foreclosure with the Board at the next CRA meeting. She said that she had discussions with the receiver, and the problem is that they want it to be used for an affordable housing type item and this is in the-area' where we have Madison Square and the purpose from the CRA standpoint is to use it for commercial development. Therefore, she will be discussing it at the next meeting to see what the Board would like to do. Counsel Boutsis indicated that the last two items that she would like to add on at the next meeting would be to interview the two applicants for legal services. Counsel Boutsis then requested that item no. 11 on the Agenda be pulled. CONSENT AGENDA (There are no items) RESOLUTION (S) CRA 05 -04 -132 7. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RELATING TO SALARY OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT TO THE CRA'S EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR; AUTHORIZING TRANSFER OF $8,000 FROM THE CRA CASH ' CARRYOVER TO MULTIFAMILY - SINGLE FAMILY REHABILITATION ACCOUNT NO. 610- 1110 - 553 -34 -50 AND A TRANSFER OF $1,240 FROM THE CASH CARRYOVER TO COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION ACCOUNT 610 -1110- 552 -34 -50 IN ORDER TO FUND ,THE ANNUAL :SALARY OF A FULL -TIME ADMINISTRATIVE. ASSISTANT TO THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR POSITION; PROVIDING AN .EFFECTIVE DATE. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 7 MINUTES - July 29, 2004 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 Moved by Chair Russell and seconded by Vice Chair Palmer to approve this item. Mr. Gibson said that this is an issue that has been discussed and it is now being presented in the form of a resolution and urged the.Board to support it. Vice Chair Palmer said that even though she supports the resolution, she would like to have some clarification about the accounts. Mr. McCants explained that they have a carryover from last year which they use to supplement the shortcomings of this .year. This step has been taken since this was not included as a full -time position at the beginning of this fiscal year. Member Bryan asked as to whether it would be feasible to take the full amount from one single account rather than disturb two different accounts. Mr. McCants explained that this is the way that it was set up because they were dealing with a ten percent administrative cap and they have to do that in order to make it feasible for the part -time position.. The_ full -time position will be budgeted for next year and this will not be necessary. With no further comments or discussion the motion to approve this item passed by a 6 -0 vote. Member Wiscombe: Absent Member Cobb: Yea Member Sherar: Yea Member Bryan: Yea Member Birts- Cooper: Yea Chairperson Russell: Yea Vice Chair Palmer: Yea CRA 06 -04 -133 S. A RESOLUTION OF THE SOUTH-MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD AWARDING THE. ANNUAL JAMES T. BOWMAN SCHOLARSHIP OF $2,000 SUBDIVIDED FOUR WAYS AWARDING $500 EACH TO ANTHONY WHITLEY, ERIN ROLLE, DARIUS MURRAY AND LAQUILLY DOZIER; AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR TO DISBURSE SAID FUNDS FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 610- 1110 -559- 99 -31 PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Moved by Chair Russell and seconded by Member Sherar to approve this item. Mr. Gibson explained that this scholarship was named in honor of former Commissioner and CRA Board Member James T. Bowman. He indicated that instead of awarding one single individual they decided to divide it into .$500 increments. He then urged the Board to support this resolution. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 8 MINUTES - July 29, 2004 1 Member Cobb asked as to whether they would in the future be 2 putting a cap on the four. Mr. Gibson and Mr. McCants indicated 3 that this is the first time that they receive four complete 4 applications. In the event that next year only one person applies 5 or qualifies for the scholarship, the whole amount of $2,000 6 would be awarded to that one person. 7 8 Vice Chair Palmer asked as to what is the process being used 9 this year with re.gard,to the awards. Mr. McCants indicated that 10 the process that they used last year was based on reimbursement 11 but they later found that this was very difficult for the 12 students. What has been discussed and proposed is to pay the 13 students up front, provided that the Board agrees with this 14 method, otherwise he would like to have the Board's direction as 15 to how they would like to disburse this fund. Vice Chair Palmer 16 indicated that she is more interested in the process for 17 evaluating each application. Mr. McCants indicated that staff 18 evaluates each and every one of them very carefully and that they 19 have to meet all the requirements stated in the forms, as well as 20 a deadline that they must meet. 21 22 Chair Russell said that disbursing the money up front is 23 fine as long as staff monitors how the students are doing in 24 school. 25 26 As far as allowing the same applicant to reapply, Chair 27 Russell said that there is not a provision addressing that but 28 that they will be discussing it at a later time. 29 30 With no further comments or discussion the motion to approve 31 this item passed by a 6 -0 vote. 32 33 Member Wiscombe: Absent 34 Member Cobb: Yea 35 Member Sherar: Yea 36 Member Bryan: Yea 37 Member Birts- Cooper: Yea 38 Chairperson Russell: Yea 39 Vice Chair Palmer: Yea 40 41 42 CRA 07 -04 -134 43 9. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI .COMMUNITY 44 REDEVELOPMENT APPROVING A SINGLE FAMILY REHABILITATION 45 GRANT OF UP TO $12,827.38 AWARDED TO MOSES HIGGINS FOR 46 IMPROVEMENTS TO HIS PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5810 SW 66 47 STREET; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO DISBRUSE 48 SAID FUNDS FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 610- 1110 - 553 -34 =30 49 ENTITLED RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION; AND PROVIDING AN 50 EFFECTIVE DATE. 51 52 Moved by Vice Chair Palmer and seconded by Member 53 Sherar to approve this item. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 9 MINUTES.- July 29, 2004 Mr. Gibson said that Moses " Higgins is a very industrious young man and; constitutes a success story. Mr. McCants indicated that this is the first time in the history of the CRA that an applicant has taken advantage of all three levels. Typically,: people apply for the first level which does not require a matching fund. We have had limited people that have taken advantage of the second level, requiring a matching part. But in this case, he is taking advantage of the third level and he will be doing major repairs. Vice Chair Palmer said that some people have expressed to her that they might not be taking advantage of this program because they do not understand its process. She then recommended to try and educate the community more so that more people may benefit from it. Member Sherar said that one of his concerns is the fact that the applicant is choosing a metal roof which might be more expensive than a shingle roof. Another of his concerns is to ascertain that people who are being assisted with these types of grants that they should be required to keep their property for certain length of time. Counsel Boutsis indicated that this provision is included in the grant. Chairperson Russell moved an amendment to Section Two, line 33 of the resolution, seconded by Vice Chairperson Palmer, to add the following language: "upon execution of the. CRA's rehabilitation grant agreement, which agreement shall be recorded with Miami -Dade County's recording office." The motion to amend passed by a 6 -0 vote. Member Wiscombe: Absent Member Cobb: Yea Member Sherar: Yea. Member Bryan: Yea Member Birts- Cooper: Yea Chairperson Russell: Yea Vice Chair Palmer:" Yea With no further comments or discussion the motion to approve this item as amended passed by a 6 -0 vote. Member Wiscombe: Absent Member Cobb: Yea Member Sherar: Yea Member Bryan: Yea Member Birts - Cooper: Yea Chairperson Russell: Yea Vice Chair Palmer: Yea COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 10 MINUTES - July 29, 2004 1 2 10. A RESOLUTION OF THE SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT 3 AGENCY AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO DISBURSE $ 4 12,520:48 FROM ACCOUNT 610- 1110 - 564 -31 -20 (FISCAL YR. 5 2003- 2004) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RESIDENTIAL 6 REINVESTMENT RELATING TO ATTORNEYS' FEES; APPROVING 7 ATTORNEYS' FEES FOR NAGIN, GALLOP, FIGUEREDO, PROVIDING 8 FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 9 10 Moved by Member . Sherar and seconded by Vice Chair 11 Palmer to defer this item. Motion passed by 6 -0 vote. 12 13 Member Wiscombe: Absent 14 Member Cobb: Yea 15 Member Sherar: Yea 16 Member Bryan:. Yea 17 Member Birts- Cooper: Yea 18 Chairperson Russell: Yea 19 Vice Chair Palmer: Yea 20 21 22 PUBLIC COMMENTS 23 24 Mr. Gibson announced that after polling the .Board Members on 25 an issue that is critical in terms of SMCRA future.existence, and 26 since a quorum was established, staff is proposing to hold a 27 special meeting on August 5, 2004 at 6:30 p.m. Chairperson 28 Russell explained that Health Systems is planning to sponsor two 29 more Habitat homes and that she would like to know that they have 30 the support of this Board to find a land and make it a reality. 31 32 Valerie Newman spoke with regard to the South Miami 33 Gardens project. She said that this is a project that 34 means a lot to her since she has many friends who live 35 there and who are single mothers. She indicated that 36 the residents there are not in favor of relocating out 37 of South Miami. She said that the survey that was taken 38 before did not outlined exactly what this plan 39 involved; therefore she urged the Board to have a town 40 hall meeting with all of the residents of South Miami 41 Gardens, later than 6:00 p.m. because most of them 42 work, and suggested the Community Center as a preferred 43 site to hold the meeting. 44 45 Michelle Dozier spoke on behalf of the South Miami 46 Gardens residents, indicated that nobody had been 47 notified about tonight's meeting. She said that they 48 used to get a letter, delivered to their homesnotifying 49 them about meetings but that they have not been COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1 1 MINUTES - July 29, 2004 1 receiving it later. She indicated that the church is 2 their only source of . information about these 3 announcements. Referring to another subject, Ms. Dozier 4. indicated that there is no bus stop sign on SW 5!�h 5 Place and they really need 'it. Mr. McCants explained 6 that the. Church Street project has been funded iz 7 sections and that it might take another year before the 8 project is completed in that area. 9 10 With no further comments this session was closed. 11 12 BOARD COMMENTS 13 (None) 14 15 16 ADJOURNMENT 17 18 There being no further business to come before this Body, 19 the meeting was .adjourned at 7:30 p.m. 20 21 22 Approved:. 23 24 25 Attest: 26 Mary Scott Russell 27 CRA Chairperson 28 29 30 Maria M. Menendez 31 CRA Secretary 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 3 9 J: \My Documents \minutes \CRA 07.29.04 Minutes.doc COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: 12. MINUTES - July 29, 2004 SOUTH MIAMI . CRA - ,UPDATE FINDING ' OY NECESSITY -.DATA DATA ITEM 1990 * 2000 ** 7. Population b 1726 1649. Unemployment 8.1% (% of labor force); Poverty Rate _ 34.4% :. -43 %° (% families below'poverty level) Education attainment 49.1% 46% (% not HS grad) Mean Household Income. 5171926 21,487 Percent female head of households 36% :55% Percent receiving assistance .30 % .18% No. of Housing Units 596. 613 Percent units vacant: 8% 16 %. Percent Owner- Occupied 31% 38% * Data from SMCRA Finding of Necessity Report, 1996 * * Data from 2000 US Census, Tr. 76.3 BG 2, 3, 4 DOD /SAY EX R A\CRA Data Update 2000.doc 9 R y .. rt O' ((D � �C -=t. 0 (A, L7 cr cr X O A 'Oj ear O. N fi n n O fD � (CD Z m � (D v \ (D N ... O Ln .A O 10+ Ul N t0 01 : cD in N ,p W N pa Ul N ul ° /� l l V■` VO• C F+ (D co Cl C% W ° O t0 O ce V 19 co. c0 N pNp ° N V . -pig O O � • H Ul O co O ° N 3 NJ p bi co m W O L7 .~p O V V QO V E.+ • p CL O O ° N ° .: W . o ° CO 00 W N — O ■ & - - - - - - - - __ - . Executive Summary Methodology 2 Building Deterioration (more, than 20%/block) 6 Site Deterioration 7 Unsanitary Conditions 7 Drainage Deficiencies. 8 Ownership Diversity (more than 5 owners per block) 8 Average Age of Structure (40 + years) 8 Property Maintenance Code Violations 8 Non-Conforming Structures: Size.of Unit., 9 Non-Conform ing Structures: Parking, Required,. 9 Closed Buildings & Vacant Lots 9 inadequate Street Layout 10 High Crime Rates: Grand Theft 10 High Crime Rates: Robbery & Burglary 11 High Crime Rates: Auto - Theft & Burglary 11 High Crime Rates: Battery & Homicide .& Sex,Offenses 11 Conclusion 12 Addendum Exhibit A: Key Map - Proposed Boundary (CRA) 13 Exhibit B: Conditions Survey by Block Exhibits I-VII 14 1. Map from EAR - City's blighted area 11. South Miami Target Area Profile Ill. Table - City's existing land use IV. EAR - SFRPC's findings V. Metro Dade County' Block Grant Award VI. Chart- City's Commercial/Residential Revenues VII. Police Department Annual Report and data PAGE TWO PO N Non- Conforming Structures. Size of Units. Several blocks were identified where the size of a unit to its lot size did not meet the minimum code requirements, Non- Conforming Structures., Parking Requirements .'N9. d- conforming parking arrange- ments were identified in blocks where off= street arkin p g does not meet minimum' cotle standards as well as where streets are too narrow for parke,d,calrsl d two -way traffic. • Closed Buildings. Closed buildings indicate obsolescence and.sta.gnant economic g g.. p he .study area growth. Ten buildin s were found tobe closed or, boarded u m t • Vacant Lots. Vacant lots denote non-productive use of land in a community which leads to blighting conditions i.e., unsanitary conditions, breeding ground for crime, and limits the tax revenues to the city " • Inadequate Street Layout. Several blocks have streets that are not wide enough to maintain'two -way traffic flow and'severai blocks do not have adequate street parking. .. Y High Crime Rates:`Grand'the'ft, robbery, burglary, auto-,theft. tauto burglary, battery, homicide;'and`sex offenses are prevalent in the'studyarea. High -crime rates reflect a lack of adherence to the law and public safety. This inhibits redevelopment initiatives. Based on the facts 'stated in this report. 'the City's governing body may: reasonably request a delegation of authority from Dade County under the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969, Chapter 163, Part III. and''may I make an-official finding that a redevelopment area is neces- sary in the study area. Methodology Study Area . ,, The initial study area was defined by the City back in 1986: Throughout this ten year period it has "remained in the communi ty. develo p ment comprehensive plan of both the City and Dade Coun yThe boundaries are shown.rn Exhibit A: Key Map. Proposed Boundary for a commu- nity reinvestment area (CRA), City of South Miami Finding of Necessity. City of South Miami Study Area Executive Summary:___ .10 The establishment of.a redevelopment area requires an official finding of necessity for rede- velopment by the City and acceptance by'Dade' County. -A finding,of.'necessity for.redeVelop -:. merit is. based on the existe nce of conditions found in a. community. as described in Florida Statute: Community Redeve lop'mentAct of 1969, Chapter 163; Part Upon review and assessment of therstudy area and application of: appropriate criteria set forth in the Statute, the proposed City�of South;iMiami CRA was found,to have a combination of conditions that require a need for redevelopment. The following conditions were applicable in the study area. • Building Deterioration. A large number of structures were found: to be nn either• major or minor deteriorating condition. These structures are scattered throughout the study area. , r 1 • Site Deterioration and Deficiencies. Site, deterioration and deficiencies.were prevalent in the form. of broken glass, broken pavement in streets and sidewalks, overgrown weeds in `vacant lots and existing structures, abandoned foundations from demolished buildings*, deteriorating fences; and g arba g e & debris either in' the front yards or back allies. ! (0 Unsanitary Conditions-. Unsanitary conditions .include abandoned cars, furniture and fixtures; accumulation of trash and debris,. broken glass environmental hazards i.e:; septic tanks..., grease traps at auto repair, fiber glass & painting shops: Air quality `& waste water are concerns in a some blocks. - • Drainage Deficiencies. Drainage deficiencies were observed during rainy days of the external window. shield field study. Several blocks showed signs of flooding whereby water was standing on the streets and sidewalks. • Diversity of Ownership. Diversity of ownership was found in several blocks where. buildings or, parcels were owned by, five,.or more entities per block. Age of Structures There are several blacks where the age of the structures on average are 40 years or more. Several'additional structures'ranging'between 30 to 39 years inage: Property Maintenance Code Violations.' Violation of property maintenance standards lead to substandard conditions arising in the buildings and.inhibits investments in the area for redevelopment. (.0 PAGE FOUR FON Criteria Each block was;assessed,as to whether it did or did not meet the criteria established relative to blighting co iditions,as'stated in the Florida Statute Chapter 163.335. Findings and declarations of necessity arid 163'3,40. Definitions. They are listed below_ 1. Building deterioration of 20% or more. (Standards for building deterioration are stated in' the . building'deterioration section of. this report). 2. Presence of site deterioration or. deficiencies: 3. Presence- of unsanitary conditions 4. Drainage Deficiencies. 5. Diversity of Ownership: fi. ;Average . age of;�Structures: 40 plus years 7. Property Maintenance, Code Violations. 8. Presence of non - Conforming Structures. Size of Onit'to Lot'size. 9. Presence of non - Conforming Structures. Parking Requirements 10. Presence of closed buildings. G PAGE THREE FON Field Survey y . i y City : staff during February.. The stud area was reviewed and assessed b consultants and Ci sta through April of 1996. The, consultant examined buildings from the exterior. Notations were made on a work sheet when buildings showed signs of deterioration: Three' classifications were used to describe building deterioration: major, deterioration,. minor deterioration, or dilapidated. Also, this window shield survey by the. consultant included checking the study area for other conditions such as deterioration of site, unsanitary conditions, drainage deficiencies (noted during rainy days,) and other blighting' conditions as stated in this report. The primary. days ,of the field survey were March 9th, 14th and 21st. 'The City's Building and Zoning staff reviewed the building /parcel analysis of the consultant and confirmed the findings and made recom- rrendations as to dilapidated structures that may need to be demolished. Public Records Other information was obtained from the City or Dade County records which included the 1990 and 1995 real property tax rolls, property and maintenance code violation records, police crime data: City of South Miami Evaluation and Appraisal .Report, and the City of Soul' Miami's Comprehensive Plan. These records were'used to' obtain data on: property and maintenance code violations, drainage deficiencies, unsanitary conditions, diversity of owner- ship, age of structures, non - conforming structures, vacant lots; inadequate streets,, and high crime rates in the area. Compilation of Data Data obtained in the field and from City records and reports were assembled into a spread- sheet format. The block by block data include the following: number of buildingslparcels per block, number and percent of buildings showing deterioration. (major and minor), presence of site deficiencies, presence of unsanitary conditions; pre seInce'of drainage deficiencies, diver - sity of ownership, average age of,buildings, number of blocks having buildings in non- compli- ance"with building and zoning codes (size`of unit to lot,'I parkin g), number of closed buildings, vacant lots, property and maintenance code violations, and crime rates as reported by the police department. The detailed block by block data is shown in Exhibit B: Conditions Survey. ..PAGE FIVE - FON Determination, of Need , ssnient made as to whether it individually met the test of,either,(a) deterioration or at least t Each block was reviewed and an asse . O 3 of the other blighting criteria". Pleasefmote the follow- ing examples: :1 Eight of the nine,buildings in Block #13 show signs of deterioration, a rate of 88 %. 2.11.1. Block #,11 did not show building detenoration' but it can be classified as' blighted on the basis. of.the nine conditions-it didmeet i.e., drainage deficiency; diversityof ownership, violation of property maintenance code, inadequate street layout,' grand theft, robbery. ,burglary, auto theft, and battery. Mapping To assist with clarifying the results of the study relative to the extent of blight and the interrelationships of the conditions, a sequence of 18 maps were prepared,' each depicting the distribution of one of the criteria. The first map shows the blocks that met the building deterioration (more than 20% per block) criteria. The second shows those blocks meeting the unsanitary conditions criteria and the remainder follow the spreadsheet listing of criteria. Proposed Boundaries Usually, the boundaries of a study area for a proposed community redevelopment area locks'which•�have been found to. meet' the blight criteriaboutlined in includes a number of b e..n fou Florida Statute Chapter.163, Part lll." However, other blocks within-the surrounding area are generally considered a ' art'of the redevelopment area necessary to the'objectiVe'of elimrnating blight even though they are not blighted'individually.. The blocks that do not individually meet the blight criteria but are necessary to foster develop- ment initiatives that elimi nate blight in adjacent blocks' are included for several reasons!,;,. Some: are listed below: 1. Blocks -that do not meet blight criteria individually maybe affected by one or more.• conditions and the correction'of such could enhance the economic health of the blighted area. An example is the need for parking facilities to accommodate'the businesses in �..V . the surrounding., areas of blocks 48 and 49 as well as to provide parking,for the busi- nesses in blocks 48;and 49. The success of the redevelopment initiatives in block 4� is necessary to the economic well being of the adjacent blighted area of blocks 1 through 48. PAGE SIX FON 2. A functional relationship may exist between blocks not meeting blight criteria and the adjacent blighted area being considered. For example, linking the businesses 'and activities. that are downtown and in the business district with business and activities in p � blocks' 1 through 49 is"reasonable in order to'address • ...,the blighted area re resented m the high crime in the northwestern, central,• and southern parts of the study area as well as the surrounding neighborhoods. 3. Redevelopment funds may be needed to `eliminate deficiencies "in blocks not meeting "blight,criteria in order to corrector. stabilize conditions in the blighted area. Examples include, drainage deficiencies flow deficiencies, and .environmental hazards: S.W. 62nd STREET a 4 3 t t „ W Z W Q C C-4 to z 3 i y i i I " TERRACE vi , i, 3. 2' J., 1'• 7 z 9 8 7 6 5 4 IM5;- 2 At W ¢ .2 41 us n a 8^ 9 15 Ja 16 1718 3F9a At8: S.W. 64th TERRACE 4.7.. Sits; fJZ v . •. 15 ;+ J 16 17118 72.. 11 52 S'. 1 -49 t r s 10 U 91 78 : W z • 9 584 • . i 6.s1.. DA 217 ; s 9 y c. '. 9D v1 ¢ '• 7D 591. S.W. 64th STREET )' 53 v t 84 1,1'1,22 54 69- fS ;60.< 114 'K 955: E 55' its .8B :96! 3 56 3 •48 +!'41:::yr w 112' 197- t= S.W. 68th STREET S.W_ 69th STREET S.W. 62nd TERRACE vi , i, 3. 2' J., 1'• 7 z 9 8 7 6 5 4 312 1 W ¢ .2 41 us n a 8^ 9 15 Ja 16 1718 19 11 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17118 72.. S.W. 62nd TERRACE vi , i, 3. 2' J., 1'• 7 z 2 mullitl� 11 9 10 W ¢ S.W. 62nd TERRACE vi , i, 3. 2' J., 1'• 7 z 2 1 11 9 10 W ¢ .2 us n a 8^ 9 15 Ja 16 1718 19 11 22 ;3rd ST 77 3 72.. 11 52 r3Ts s 10 U 91 78 : W z • 71 584 � IS ' '38.'. s 9 y c. '. 9D 79 ¢ '• 7D 591. S.W. 64th STREET )' 53 3 t 84 I.s 54 69- fS ;60.< 114 'K 955: E 55' its .8B Ii3 :96! 3 56 3 •48 +!'41:::yr w 112' 197- t= 67 � w '.11T .981: H 47 424 vi §25�4 86 83 66 63'. 4&' 7 so y :109 00: B s1 3 108 tot 9 62 w 10T, 102 0 63 117 1065103' 1 64 2 105`:.104 S.W. 66th STREET 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 10 11 34 t '93' 31 73 12 13 15 Ja 16 1718 19 202.1 22 14 NEWIN Building Deterioration: Major & Minor (More than 20% per block) 94' 175 , 74` ':SSS, 'S4'! {35'a MIMI, 34 t '93' 6 73 'S6:" .53� ,u 33 92 77 72.. 57; Building Deterioration: Major & Minor (More than 20% per block) 94' 175 , 74` ':SSS, 'S4'! {35'a MIMI, 34 t '93' 6 73 'S6:" .53� !35" 33 92 77 72.. 57; 52 r3Ts 32 U 91 78 : W z • 71 584 twf `51 ; '38.'. s 31 c. '. 9D 79 ¢ '• 7D 591. y ,',5 :39 r V 3 t 84 4 80 $ 69- fS ;60.< i.,4 49. e40',';: E .8B 81 66? ..61:' 3 •48 +!'41:::yr 87 82 vi 67 62' H 47 424 vi §25�4 86 83 66 63'. 4&' 543 ' 85 84 45 44 S.W. 70th STREET S.W. 70th STREET w 12 R, 11T, 11 2D 7 4 10 19 8 5 9 18 9 8 B = Q 22 2 Q METRO TAT] 0 21 a 49 1 44 0 u 7 45 7 < S.W. T1 st STREET r0 18 19 20 20 5 J ui 15 11 m 9 6 S.W. 71st ST. < 18 T 5 u «t 448�� 5 14 13 3 10 q ; 47 N 0. 17 8 y 11 3 ; 1617 as ; 76 9 12 7152 1 72tN rn 1 2 3 4 ftttg n ss 15 14 13 12 11 10 1 S.W. 72nd STREET FIGURE' 1 CITY OF.SOUTH MIAMI FINDING'OF NECESSITY W 7 Z W Q n h N MIMI, Q 22 2 Q METRO TAT] 0 21 a 49 1 44 0 u 7 45 7 < S.W. T1 st STREET r0 18 19 20 20 5 J ui 15 11 m 9 6 S.W. 71st ST. < 18 T 5 u «t 448�� 5 14 13 3 10 q ; 47 N 0. 17 8 y 11 3 ; 1617 as ; 76 9 12 7152 1 72tN rn 1 2 3 4 ftttg n ss 15 14 13 12 11 10 1 S.W. 72nd STREET FIGURE' 1 CITY OF.SOUTH MIAMI FINDING'OF NECESSITY W 7 Z W Q n h N PAGE SEVEN FON SITE DETERIORATION Site deterioration. and deficiencies s in`the study area es were found in thirty-seven of the block or 76% of all blocks in the study area,. Site deterioration and deficiencies. consist of broken pavement and sidewalks, overgrown, weeds and;grass broken. glass and debris, abandoned cars and furniture, broken fences, and abandoned foundations from demolished buildings. See the Figure 2 map which indicates the applicable blocks. UNSANITARY CONDITIONS ry accumulation of trash and debris. broken glass, abandoned Unsanita conditions: accu cars/furniture, overcrowdin g !a nd'envi ronmental hazards caused by, the prevalence of septic tanks, grease traps' at auto Jrepair, fiber glass, and painting shops. Air quality and waste: water. are concerns in a few. blocks .of the study area.- Overcrowding was sited as a problem in the South Miami_Target area profile prepared,by the Research Division of Metropolitan Dade County Planning Department, May 1993,' (Exhibit I Page 15). This profile states that about 20% of the -occupied units'in the target area (the same geographic area as the study area here) contained; more than one person per room, the standard measure of overcrowd - ing. This was slightly; higher than the 18 percent in the county as a whole. Renter occupied units were somewhat more,likely to be crowded; with 21% having more than one person per room This, was lower'than the county's 26 % of .rental units. The City's EAR states. that the sanitary sewers serve over one- third:of the City's land area. The remaining two- thirds of the City is,served by.on -site septic tank,systems. The, report. indicates that this is an eventual unsanitary condition for the City. Most of the proposed CRA area is served by sanitary sewer but many of the homes in the served area are yet to be connected to the collection system. Also, approximately. ne- fifth. of the. proposed CAA area.it not. served. '.It.is a matter of regional policy to 'eliminate the use of se p tic tanks on lots smaller than one `acre:: Therefore, most of the.residential lots in South Miami should be.served by sanitary sewers "(See'Exhibit IV for the documentation about sanitary servers in the City). Thirty -seven of the blocks in the study g o area show signs of unsanitary conditions. This �s 71 /a of the study area.. See Figure 3 map which shows the affected areas. S.W. 62nd STREET ! S.W. 64tt 4— E 17"- X11"M V303 .3z-A,7 ['.-*4 9, "N R M21 R W TM 7 4zF' .. ;4 Aw. *'179 7,97, 7f3lu 26--, Z Lu > S.W. 66th TERRACE PARK S.W. 66th STREET u; S.W. 69th STREET r, I I . i . . 74 7 8 0 j 3 2 1 -3 z I 7T3F 15, 93 ',76'1 , 20 21 73 10 11 12 1314 15 16 17 1 u, J112, ����� :53X lVINEVOIN ®�mfSTM 76 74 awma Natimst Lk Site Deterioration w 3 u end Deficiencies'. 2 (at least 3 per block). q 11 S it r5 10�u°i 3 6. 9 uj _4 51 - .0 �E ei S.W- fiathSTAEET :53X 76 74 55 . Si Lk iaL -3 z I 7T3F 15, 93 ',76'1 , 20 21 73 56 . , - � A u, J112, 72 V:52 uj 71 581, ui 51 J)M! :5 — 59 7, 59 AQ, 1W 4 so.'"pi 69 69 60 6 8 -61 9i ;6ZV 14 ui 1 0 7, 102 40 N 67 62 47 0 63. i:, tislc. -.106-103 —66763 6 46 6�4i 6sj7 105• 104 (_�64 S.W. 66th STREET - .0 �E ei S.W- fiathSTAEET 111111 -1. .6 5 - 4 -3 z I 7T3F 15, , 16 7 18 19 I... 20 21 22 7, 1=41 . , - � 111 ** " - - .0 �E ei S.W- fiathSTAEET mom own Miss" OW413 ow" Wks W Owtv " NOMP&IN NOWTV Imm Em IN mm mill" IV 7 i S.W. 71st STREET a- 6 15 12 0 9 5 14 13 3 10 4 4 11 3 v; 12 S 2 1 S.W. 72nd STREET FIGURE 2,... 'CITY oF.s(DOTH MIAMI 'P-:*IN INC�-p .E;NECESSITY Lu D Z ILI dc 10 111111 MWMIN INtm NOW-111 mom own Miss" OW413 ow" Wks W Owtv " NOMP&IN NOWTV Imm Em IN mm mill" IV 7 i S.W. 71st STREET a- 6 15 12 0 9 5 14 13 3 10 4 4 11 3 v; 12 S 2 1 S.W. 72nd STREET FIGURE 2,... 'CITY oF.s(DOTH MIAMI 'P-:*IN INC�-p .E;NECESSITY Lu D Z ILI dc 10 PAGE EIGHT FO N DRAINAGE DEFICIENCIES Drainage deficiencies were, identified during the consultants field survey in the months of February through April of 1,996: Parts of the study'area were provided with french drains'. and catch basins but there is still a substantial amount of water that resides in the area during heavy rains. Blocks 2 -16, 19, -26 and 3.6 -40 show signs„ of standing water on either the side - walks or streets or both. Block `grant funds have been 'allocated to correct a few of these blocks.(See Exhibit V). Du'e mostly to' the lack of the City's drainage data, the existing com- prehensive plan identifies'a need for a comprehensive 'drainage '. engineering study to be done to determined,the capacity and the existing levels of service for the City's drainage facilities. Twenty- nine of the blocks, in the study area are affected which is 59 %'of ail blocks in the stud area. See Figure 4 ma which indicates the various blocks. .. Y 9 P ocks. DIVERSITY OF OWNERSHIP Diversity of ownership is considered to be a deterrent to the redevelopment process. Marge number of diverse owners. makes it difficult for developers or other interested parties to p R P Thirty- g e blocks in the study assemble land for redevelopment ur oses.:Thi ei ht or 78 /a of th area have diverse own p p consultant considered only those blocks which ershi , patterns. The c had five or more different owners of buildings/parcels on an individual block. It should be -noted that some of the blocks (20 -26 & 31 -33) consist of single family dwellings�with long term owners and would not necessarily be candidates for redevelopment needing a change of X. ownership. See Figure 5- map depicting- -the data as discussed. AGE OF STRUCTURES The blocks with an.average age of 40 years or more,were identified as_well as those with g 0- 39.years. Twenty blocks or 41 of the study area have buildings with an ages between 3 �� age of 40 years,or� over. This Is a substantial number. See Figure 6. map. with this information. PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE VIOLATIONS- - - Violation of property'.maintenance requirements .le.ad to substandard conditions and endan- gers the life and; property of those in the dwelt n Twenty -nin or. 59% of the blocks in the dwellings or parcels that do not meet the standards Y .._ g p set forth by the City. This stud area have d information was obtained from the City's properly maintenances code violations list which cited 11020 complaints against! property owners in the.target area from,January. 1995 to December 1995. Figure :7 shows those blocks. W, z W i COZEN 03,11,55, I I L ffilmmo MIN > 31 Oman MFvM Norm= 6 s 4 3,2 1 wpm sw4law "wilum d TERRACE 12.0. 10 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 IB u — 10' 1• i COZEN 03,11,55, I I L ffilmmo MIN S.W. 62nd STREET 31 Oman MFvM Norm= 6 s 4 3,2 1 wpm sw4law "wilum d TERRACE 12.0. 10 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 IB u — 10' 1• Un s an1tay Conditions S.W. 62nd STREET S.W.,66th ST�fEET 31 Oman MFvM Norm= mmum mms-� TC?-13 A 's 4'3 wpm sw4law "wilum S.W.,66th ST�fEET 31 TC?-13 A 's 4'3 2 d TERRACE 12.0. 15 18 17 16 19 2D .2 u — 10' 1• Un s an1tay Conditions L) 2 4 3 it 3 9,w 4 th STREET, 7F. 175i', '14 75-1 735, 341 ;:113;.'96 >.i INR T3 56 3 33 &U 2 72 57 �r� 22 .,11V .111, 7;97, UA 0 "in' 784 71 55' 36 ,tl ti 31 JI'l 0 70 59 0 -J 0 3 116 4 ,, ad -=� 6760 . 1-5 A V L) 5 29 '106 101 3 ;g8' 51:3 68 61 I n 41'.' 25 S.W.,66th ST�fEET 11IN �����IN MOM 1 11►,�.11l� �1 pi.��, .����,��� @� �`'► 004-M sEffm �b���� 00��0A0������ +�������� tt VOLUM tmwtL.-.m •�� 111111.111 � ©!�� +�11� `��iy� mos.= N—IFIM fill [=I ffm 31 .0 's 4'3 2 Am 12.0. 15 18 17 16 19 2D 22 lZV 10' 1• yr�1 11IN �����IN MOM 1 11►,�.11l� �1 pi.��, .����,��� @� �`'► 004-M sEffm �b���� 00��0A0������ +�������� tt VOLUM tmwtL.-.m •�� 111111.111 � ©!�� +�11� `��iy� mos.= N—IFIM fill [=I ffm )7, S.W. 71st STREET CL I' a I Y•2a',V S, 26'. 11- c r I , . ,6 -il , 19:. - G,;,., j 25-'r 12-- S.W. 71 4 1 24-.1 4 a M. IT, 11 r 7 -%57 2 '1 3 15141312'M 021 20191 S.W. 72nd STREET -'FIGURE CITY OF: ,SOUTH MIAMI FINDING`O x: 31 .0 Am METR TATIO )7, S.W. 71st STREET CL I' a I Y•2a',V S, 26'. 11- c r I , . ,6 -il , 19:. - G,;,., j 25-'r 12-- S.W. 71 4 1 24-.1 4 a M. IT, 11 r 7 -%57 2 '1 3 15141312'M 021 20191 S.W. 72nd STREET -'FIGURE CITY OF: ,SOUTH MIAMI FINDING`O x: 31 Am METR TATIO 10' 1• .27 )7, S.W. 71st STREET CL I' a I Y•2a',V S, 26'. 11- c r I , . ,6 -il , 19:. - G,;,., j 25-'r 12-- S.W. 71 4 1 24-.1 4 a M. IT, 11 r 7 -%57 2 '1 3 15141312'M 021 20191 S.W. 72nd STREET -'FIGURE CITY OF: ,SOUTH MIAMI FINDING`O x: PAGE NiNE FON NON - CONFORMING STRUCTURES: SIZE OF UNITS Non - conforming unit size to lot size was identified in those blocks where�dwelling units did standards set by the City.' of. the blocks i y ea not meet the minimum code m the stud ar or 33 include dwellings units which are non- conform.mg to the c /a urrent City codes' Figure.8 ma shows the applicable block P PP s NON - CONFORMING STRUCTURES: 'PARKING REQUIRED .:Non- conforming parking facilities orthe lack thereof were identified in block areas where off - street parking, available for some buildings does not meet minimum City code standards, As stated in the proposed osed bo�unda discussion, arkin in several-areas of the stud a not 9, 36 -40, 48 & 49 all have parking needs. In the P rY P_ 9 Y, area is provided.where needed. Blocks- 12- 16,:30, the stud area, 20'blocks or 41,/0 of the blocks include buildings that are non - conforming to park- Y - , . . ' s the. cons_ ultants observation mg requirements.setforth by the Citys.zonmg codes:This i based on a window sheild survey. Fi ure 9 ma shows the _ y g p blocks where parking require -, ments are not being, met. CLOSED BUILDINGS AND VACANT LOTS Closed buildings indicate obsolescence and economic stagnation. In the study area, 8 blocks or 16% of the. blocks include vacant'and or boarded -up buildings. Based. on the field survey conducted by, the; consultant and. information obtained from the City staff, a total of 8 buildinas were found .to be closed: Vacant lots :are a- sign that land is not being utilized which limits the tax revenues (See Exhibit VI City of South Miami Tax Revenue: Commercial and Residential and.Exhibit.11l existing land use in'South'Miami),_the use of potential productive-: property, and may lead-to a breeding g unsanitary conditions,; and other social ilis' Twenty -seven blocks or 55% of round for:crime, loc all blocks in the study area' included vacant lots. The field survey, conducted by the consultant and information obtained from the City staff confirmed these,; findings.,,, The location of those blocks. with either closed buildings or vacant lots or. both is shown on the Fi ure , 10 ma attached., ..9 P ,._ r Lu z W c S.W. 62nd STREET S.W. 64th TERRACE Tz 6' 9 S.W. 69th STREET . - M1,11 1 5 4 ft*� No"= MKM 9 8 7 6 5 4 1i 3 11 2 1 — — — 12 9 81716151413 1 13 15 16 17 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 3 34 3811-If q;4 =97- _•9 (at f9=1 017 *rhy Irrvat wqh.n ,2 3, 4 ci.w. u%m a a nmr. I 1 53 z AV us. 2� An �Orp ;95 xia ffil :59:g 31s: , A. 4 0 60, f 5 108 101: il�, A !� a A #-, f w I ;� � 7 DT 1025 W BTr 62 V3 .83"- .66"1 i 63 48 T434 161 STREET tu 9 M1,11 7 6 5 4 ft*� No"= MKM "MMIN �����`.j.� mwkm ", — VMFZ� (at f9=1 017 *rhy Irrvat wqh.n ,2 3, 4 ci.w. u%m a a nmr. I 1 53 z AV us. 2� An �Orp ;95 xia ffil :59:g 31s: , A. 4 0 60, f 5 108 101: il�, A !� a A #-, f w I ;� � 7 DT 1025 W BTr 62 V3 .83"- .66"1 i 63 48 T434 161 STREET tu 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 "MMIN mwxm ,W*111091 mwkm ", — 31 — — — — 12 9 81716151413 1 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 14 u LU S.W. 68th STREET ui vorrm 1 U P 4 6 i 11 "MMIN mwxm ,W*111091 mwkm ", III 2 1514 1312 11 9 81716151413 1 'I 12 1 to > loll 121314151617 8 7: u LU S.W. 68th STREET ui vorrm 1 U P 4 6 i 11 "MMIN mwxm ,W*111091 mwkm ", III 101LINW, I NN moffm NKUN �Vm Ow-amill 1 ONFMN 11111 ............ S.W. 70th STREET -S.W. TOM STREET Rl 121, -20.U.'T, 4 154 119 5 5 4 6 7 8 9 10 3. 16 2 1514 1312 11 I 'I 16 30' ;22 2 29 1 8 METRO TATIO -4 27 1 21 0— w S.W. 71st STREET 19 20 • 20 .5 L) 7 > Ill' �. a . ui 19 6 25 12 15112 0 .. S.W.T1st 18 7 24 1 13 _.L.. . ! a C 48 IIt IC �13 10 1 a 17 a 23 14 W 1721 X a 3 m 33 1 3.1 U) 16 9 Z2 15 11 10 2 3 4 5 1413 72nd STREET __ FIGURE 4 'UTH F! S�CESsmff. :'CITY!*-0F,58b 'MIAMI S.W. 62nd STREET ■ee����>toa��c�e±tll Fri! 62nd 1 S.W. 64th STREET 1. 7 6 5 4 ' 1 10 ',11 1 53 31 Ets 12 13. I 54 19 2021 114 95 94 75 ` 74 55' 54 ' 3S 34 ! 55 t1S 113 96 91 78 }. 73 58 53. a8 ' 3] ! 56 w i12 97 92 .77.' 72' 67: 62" "37' 32 l 57 W MEN 98 I 91 78 w i _ 71 ; 58 " ' 61 3B ¢ 31 '11 99 a ! 59 BD 16 -5c N 109 00. G ,90 B9.. 479.' so- $ '89 MIS i -49 -40• 5 29 7 8 61 3 ' 108 i Dt 3 '.88 81 •' 3 .. 68 61 ' 3 • 48 41 3 28 e 9 62 107 102 a 87 82 vi 67: 62'• H 47 42 v! 27 111 S.W. 64th STREET 1. 7 6 5 4 ' 1 10 ',11 1 53 31 Ets 12 13. I 54 19 2021 114 95 94 75 ` 74 55' 54 ' 3S 34 ! 55 t1S 113 96 91 78 }. 73 58 53. a8 ' 3] ! 56 w i12 97 92 .77.' 72' 67: 62" "37' 32 l 57 W 111 98 v 91 78 w i _ 71 ; 58 " ' 61 3B ¢ 31 '11 99 a ! 59 BD 16 -5c N 109 00. G ,90 B9.. 479.' so- $ '89 MIS i -49 -40• 5 29 7 8 61 3 ' 108 i Dt 3 '.88 81 •' 3 .. 68 61 ' 3 • 48 41 3 28 e 9 62 107 102 a 87 82 vi 67: 62'• H 47 42 v! 27 111 106 103 86 83 '; 66' 63 46 43 28 1 r6-4-1 2 s5 105 10d BS B4 = 65 84 45 44 25 z� S.W. 66th STREET • ,,, 9' 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 10 ',11 31 Ets 12 13. 15 16 17 18 19 2021 22 14 BOB 0 0a0Q�D eesm. 00 0� EEEII�IE 8 N 81 mmmm�,=: Ets EEEII�IE 8 N 81 EEEII�IE 8 N 81 LU J METR TATIO 21 - — 7. > S.W. 71st STREET 5O. 18 19 D G 48 1 11 N '8 5.6 r m T< 4T S.W. 71 :e s 16 12 9 5 5 L. 14 13 i 10 m G N 3 H w `J 1817a a a; a V N' ! X 2 1 121 1 2 3 9 f .. , .. S.W. 72nd STREET , . -..,. ..., : ;,FIGURE -5• . CITY OF MIAMI FINDING OF NECESSITY Z W Q ti 3 H S.W.66ih'STREET , W v C y 7 3' 't,! �yZ`' -, =`�� tip•. •�c�;�►"' 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 41 ", 10 11 12 1'3141 15 16 17 18 NOW ���i��►�� "1't K. IIAI1`r11I t �3� ,� E A noting S.W. 70th STREET :T fl�s® m0 �KIM m0 . ®(a 5 q 6 7 8 9 10 3 46 2 1s 14 13 12 11 1 � 0 2 W ;, 22 3 < `METRO TAT10 �'�� 21 I "4 J ' 1 0 v 7 S.W.71st STREET ,'o 14 •• 20 S I 1 it vi , 8 qs 6. S.W. 71 S1 18 7 ... 15 12 14 13 3 10 4 17. 8 _ 12: • 3 1111 t12 1' � 721 N 2 3 4 Stttg p,1 w151413�121171 S.W. 72nd STREET _..1. .., .._ .., i r , .. _ FIGURE 6 CITY OF � U KMIAMI r� FINDING OF=NECESSITY 0 w z IM a r• t1 0 S.W. 62nd STREET 1 2 3 4 4 5 6 6 3 34 3 3 3 3' ; ;37 3 38 c c39 t tap; Blocks With Buildings '1 1 3 n n 1 11 tm 6 2 1 11 r r Z; 8 ? 6s'l.:3 � �2' a as p p :C o a A A i in the following categories S.W. 62nd T TERRACE 2 3 1 10 • ••.3,. S ?s' s s, rkt 1 1x8 ` 82nd TERRACE, i � & i T o�S 1 Age Of Structures ffi /i 4 43 h h 1 10 3 q � �• s � 6 < 6 q s'"�, � 6 i9t, � S S` ` 9 1 10 I IL • • • • ( (30 to 39 years) &W, 6 63rd S SS bt ' 't2 tt 1 10 1 11 71 � 1 ?:.t14et 1 1: � `9 9 � � 1 3 tti` : :` • •bra r r12S 7 7tK1576!1t;.... 4 4 S '� S 4 4 >'3 Z Z.1:tr t I 3 t4 1 t t t t f f t n n B B7 tT f fA Y Y5 7 a a"IOa 5 5i4 8 8+ + +" IQ 1 • •• • • : L S.W. 6 64th S STREET 74, r r.55 t 54w •3511) J •• • • • • 76' 7 73. 5 58" y y53t i i16y & &W.64th TERRACE 7 7 • ' • 5 56A4 ? ? v v172 T w x x k T� W W 1 6T�}2 x x } }, w 79• . k:5 p 8 80 . e49r 4 4th :3 r J.29 7 r (�z t . 3 , ,60^r p 3 n nlDB llli!+ 3 3 r r89 s set t . e 8TH k k48r I I41i ' x,� i i • • G • S 82 k?. ' r 3 q 1 107 102 ' '• B BZ+ 6 62 N N t t 6] ,. J J82 N N 1.471 . .'421" N N ` ` ° ' i i • • • • ' 108 103. B BB$ i i83' r r66' 6 63 ; ;48 i iii W v C y 7 3' 't,! �yZ`' -, =`�� tip•. •�c�;�►"' 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 41 ", 10 11 12 1'3141 15 16 17 18 NOW ���i��►�� "1't K. IIAI1`r11I t �3� ,� E A noting S.W. 70th STREET :T fl�s® m0 �KIM m0 . ®(a 5 q 6 7 8 9 10 3 46 2 1s 14 13 12 11 1 � 0 2 W ;, 22 3 < `METRO TAT10 �'�� 21 I "4 J ' 1 0 v 7 S.W.71st STREET ,'o 14 •• 20 S I 1 it vi , 8 qs 6. S.W. 71 S1 18 7 ... 15 12 14 13 3 10 4 17. 8 _ 12: • 3 1111 t12 1' � 721 N 2 3 4 Stttg p,1 w151413�121171 S.W. 72nd STREET _..1. .., .._ .., i r , .. _ FIGURE 6 CITY OF � U KMIAMI r� FINDING OF=NECESSITY 0 w z IM a r• t1 0 NOW ���i��►�� "1't K. IIAI1`r11I t �3� ,� E A noting S.W. 70th STREET :T fl�s® m0 �KIM m0 . ®(a 5 q 6 7 8 9 10 3 46 2 1s 14 13 12 11 1 � 0 2 W ;, 22 3 < `METRO TAT10 �'�� 21 I "4 J ' 1 0 v 7 S.W.71st STREET ,'o 14 •• 20 S I 1 it vi , 8 qs 6. S.W. 71 S1 18 7 ... 15 12 14 13 3 10 4 17. 8 _ 12: • 3 1111 t12 1' � 721 N 2 3 4 Stttg p,1 w151413�121171 S.W. 72nd STREET _..1. .., .._ .., i r , .. _ FIGURE 6 CITY OF � U KMIAMI r� FINDING OF=NECESSITY 0 w z IM a r• t1 0 ���i��►�� "1't K. IIAI1`r11I t �3� ,� E A noting S.W. 70th STREET :T fl�s® m0 �KIM m0 . ®(a 5 q 6 7 8 9 10 3 46 2 1s 14 13 12 11 1 � 0 2 W ;, 22 3 < `METRO TAT10 �'�� 21 I "4 J ' 1 0 v 7 S.W.71st STREET ,'o 14 •• 20 S I 1 it vi , 8 qs 6. S.W. 71 S1 18 7 ... 15 12 14 13 3 10 4 17. 8 _ 12: • 3 1111 t12 1' � 721 N 2 3 4 Stttg p,1 w151413�121171 S.W. 72nd STREET _..1. .., .._ .., i r , .. _ FIGURE 6 CITY OF � U KMIAMI r� FINDING OF=NECESSITY 0 w z IM a r• t1 0 0 2 W ;, 22 3 < `METRO TAT10 �'�� 21 I "4 J ' 1 0 v 7 S.W.71st STREET ,'o 14 •• 20 S I 1 it vi , 8 qs 6. S.W. 71 S1 18 7 ... 15 12 14 13 3 10 4 17. 8 _ 12: • 3 1111 t12 1' � 721 N 2 3 4 Stttg p,1 w151413�121171 S.W. 72nd STREET _..1. .., .._ .., i r , .. _ FIGURE 6 CITY OF � U KMIAMI r� FINDING OF=NECESSITY 0 w z IM a r• t1 0 S.W. 62nd STREET I j City of South Miami `v (Received 1.020 complaints 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 29 30 1 31 3 37 38 39 2 Irom 01!01/95 to 12!31 /95) J 4 112 1 5 4 3 2 1 0 s 5yh a Blocks with more than one 3'' 97 t un 2 71 2 B q C B A, .e.....>.. S W. 82nd TERRACE " ` complaint on list) 3 10 3 S.W. 62nd TERRACE i HE 9 4 5 4 3 2 1 W Yr' �. ,U, 1St 1 t 5 t tt b< 65 !8 t7 A! _ B W 7 i 8 9 6, ,ter S 2 i to D z W a N IL ■ Inaeeoaac S7 a 6 7 8 9 10 S 7 (Those blocks with only one m 61 h t0 A ri 1 . 14 °_ 1 S.W. 83rd n ST 3 11 f complaint.) :$ 3 3 0 2 13 $ 2 '.. 12 n 74 75 76 n 3 3 412 ; 3 'S4 3 2 1 fN 4 :. . B N 4 11 w 4 6 15 7 8 S 9 W 10 = 64th x 5 STREET ( ,. S,W. TSad STREET 1 .. ( FIGURE 7 CITY OF MIAMI FINDING'OF NECESSITY i t 2- � 2 15 Is S.W. 84th TS7IRACE 4 17 S.W. 62nd STREET 1 6 15 . hr. q 9 8 7 6 5 4I j 2 1 9 19 r 41 t7 S.W. 62nd TERRACE s 10 1112 1314 15 16 17 18 Bldg: coverage over speeined �'jmax• W + lu m 1 dimensional ro quimments- residentlaD 9 3 2 82 ..�.; { 7 S3rd ST 10 3 v �` �k S.W. 6 of N' ; S` .ate 8 9 H } PARR i I 10' S.W. 68th STREET i35 1 S.W. � s] S.W. 69th STREET S.W. 70th STRE i 12 I I -..... ._. .. 1-T t 7 2 1 it 20 7 4' 10 19 i 16 '9 i 8 g z 5 6 15 D c a A q 9 8 7 6 5 4I 3 2 1 wkiiiiii 19 r 41 t7 S.W. 62nd TERRACE 10 1112 1314 15 16 17 18 S.W. 70th STRE i 12 I I -..... ._. .. 1-T t 7 2 1 it 20 7 4' 10 19 i 16 '9 i 8 g z 5 6 15 D c a A q � >• 111111TIM 1 40 wkiiiiii 19 r S.W. 70th STRE i 12 I I -..... ._. .. 1-T t 7 2 1 it 20 7 4' 10 19 i 16 '9 i 8 g z 5 6 15 D c a A q 3 J13192 2 1 1 S.W. 6Tth STREET i 32 , 9 8 D c a A 3 2 1 Non- Conforming Structures. 11 39 40 16 1718 19 r 2 21 t7 S.W. 62nd TERRACE (Size of units relative to the lot size: r, Bldg: coverage over speeined �'jmax• W 2 m 1 dimensional ro quimments- residentlaD 9 2 { 7 S3rd ST 10 3 �` �k �; of 5 ; S` .ate 8 9 H 4 +, 8 � 10' S.W. 64th STREET s] 111 95- 94 175 1 74 'S5 54 35 34 t 55 its 113 93 76, T3 55 53 36 33 1 56 w 112 �61 92 77 72 57: 52 37 32 1 57 ' 111 U 91' '78' 71 -58. crai 51 38 31 58� 1 99 90 70 59: y i S9 t8 t FD ag. 479 < 5 39 V 3 7 z 60 a 9 D0. 89 80'5 69 60 "49 40 29 8 61 - 3 H "108 101 3 88 81 68 2-1 48 41 3 28 9 62 107 102 W 87 82 H "'67` 62 u) '47 42 ui 27 6 N7 106 103 ' 86 83 66 63 46 43 26 2 65 105 104 85 84 65 64 45 44 25 S.W. 66th STREET - -• - 9 8 f 7'6 5 4 31 3 2 1 ' 1D 11 12 15 16 1718 19 r 2 21 22 13 14 ' S.W. 68th STREET 3 N � MSI National 1 •�• 11�11R1./11, mom LU METR TATIO w 21 1 4 - { _ 1 0 v 7 7 > S.W. 71st STREET • o. r� 1B 19 20 % 20 S 1 11 $_ 8458 ,, ►� 5, W 19 5 1 to S.W. 71st ST. 4, 3 , 47 48 14 13 3 10 a �. � ' m 17 { 8 121 2 3 4 lift oi: i y151a131211 S.W. 72nd STREET ,-..FIGURE 8 _ CITY OF SOUTH : - MIAMI HONG . ECESSITY' 0 W Z W Q�A N EO { 1 I .. I u! 3 '2 1 18 S.W:64thTERRACE q 5 B ~ .. v 7 6 1.. 14 V .4. o M w a 27. 46 1 S.W. 62nd STREET 115 111 111 114 95_ 113 96 W 112 9T z W 1tt 98 a 11 99 n 109 00 y 108 101 107 102 1D6 103 105 104 STREET w v y a ., 94 TS I 1. 1 92 37 t. 2 3 4 5 8 29 30 3 38 59 4D 34 33 32 t- ¢ u 5 3 28 to 27 26 25 22 fu 2 1 51 1 1 1 y, . s 4 :• 1 •12 . 1 3: M e/ 9e 4J t tM 5 4 3 2 1 D 0 C e 'A 1B' 2,' 11 2 e • 42' 55 93 76 Non- Conforming Structures 36 sw.62ndTERRAGE 3 10 3 4 S.W.62n11TERRACE (Parkingrequirements( a3 4 9 4 $ „ [,V�W 92 ,, , w 2 37 1 S el 4 le !e 41 g T•: �� g 31 8 •, < 3 to 5 78 51 S.W. 03rd 57 s , b• '1 •T, • B A 10 � 411 2 53 14•t °A °v • 2 13 > "Z N S.W. 63rd ST 39 40 5 10 3' 20 g . 3 r I /Sirl/ 6 A 411 4 3 2 1 5... 8 ui 1: 4. 9 ;, c tA.1374 D n� :4 m 4, 1S 68 8t 9. 41 _ 1113-71 W. B E 71 A ® 5 :10 : 5. •• ar es 36 49 62 67 82 86 .47 42 • �. t t 4 1 1 8 •• 31 50 63 11 24 12 s 3B ' S1 6d 65 66th S.W. 64th STREET ' 43 { 1 I .. I u! 3 '2 1 18 S.W:64thTERRACE q 5 B ~ .. v 7 6 1.. 14 V .4. o M w a 27. 46 1 53 115 111 111 114 95_ 113 96 W 112 9T z W 1tt 98 a 11 99 n 109 00 y 108 101 107 102 1D6 103 105 104 STREET w v y a ., 94 TS 74 55 73 SB W 72 57 Z 71 58 < 70 59 5 69 60 3 68 61 vi .67 62 66 63 t' 6S 64 w v S L49 N '� 54 35 34 33 32 t- ¢ u 5 3 28 to 27 26 25 22 fu 2 15 28 41 54 3 1B' 29 42' 55 93 76 53 36 4 17 30 a3 56' 92 77 52 37 S t8 31 44 57, 9t 78 51 38 6 t9 32 45 53 90 79 ' 69 4 80 5 39 40 T 20 33 34 46 1 47 S9 B 21 60 1e 9 22 68 8t 48 41 _ 1113-71 23 36 49 62 67 82 86 .47 42 31 50 63 11 24 12 25 3B ' S1 6d 65 66th B3 46 43 85 B4 45 44 23 39 52 S.W. 13 6 3 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 10 2' IM MUM 31 12 13 15 16 17 t8 192021 22 14 +S S.W. 67th STREET W tl _ 3 PARK m U N S.W. 68th STREET ' S.W. 68th STREET - z r rs4 1 1e11st1t1 1 35 3 36 S.W. 69th STREET 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 4, 1 j 1D 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 t , MIN 6 7 8 46 15 14 13 Hv In moms 3 12 11 2' IM MUM MIN 6 7 8 46 15 14 13 9 10 In 4 3 12 11 2' I QSQQQ�QeQQD Via �:;��. 1. mwtm 1w lip WWI 1w e�08�� Q80® . m� nm mo , ©M 5 6 7 8 46 15 14 13 9 10 4 3 12 11 2' 37 30 2 29 w `- 3 28 METR TAT10 21 4 4s 27 J 1 0 v 7 7 > S.W. 71st STREET s LV 1B 39 20 20 J, 5 45 7 W 1 11 8 8 19 w S.W.71st5T. a j 15 12 m 9 5 m ', t� 48)11 a iH. 7 i 14 13 q 10 4 3 47 n 17 a a e 12 ( t1 7A3 3 "' J' 1g 3 b 2 1 +,1 w 1 2 3 4 sstt 9 It is 1514 t3i211 S.W. 72nd STREET. FIGURE 9 'CITY OF MIAMI FINDING OF NECESSITY Z W y h Ui S.W. 62nd STREET 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 29 30 31132 10 3T 1 38 1 39 1 40 33 13 1S16171 SI4I3I2 1 1t Z1 • 9 7 1• 1 8 19 3 991 Im 14 15 161718 2 85 4 3 2 1 D COB A .. S.W. 62nd TERRACE - „ C 3 S W.82nd TERRACE ... ....... Vacant Land "ti 36 21 2 1 1 (at least 2 or more per block) > B : *'6'F !43 S.W. 63rd ST — - - y 1•g x g, . IB +114 4 t1 a 2 7 Closed Buildings (at least one) 2 Soot u tt1 [;;U 0• 27, t 13 "e~1 S S.W. 63rd ST " '> 3e c 3, t+i '' S 10 3 Both 1 • • • E 7t 7! Q" ; i21 h fl" 21 �i4 4.:, •�•••• . 1 I �* %4.4:114 •?4 att(� 8 : 9 .67rt1 T 21 I fA 6t A' fb tiY3x1 ?'8` 1IT4S1 _. 6 k .1? j( '4'u TR �. .x 7 . B 5 ,�..c r S.W.'64th STREET.; i.0 474c, Z7 40 531" 3 t2 1.f, 28 41 '114 95.' D4� " 7a 55 54 35 34 1 ? +478 29 42 55d 11S ; 13 .�6rf x933 1764: 73 56 :53 38 33 `x1Tt.' v 30 43 56� j` w 112 Ar+l MI, `77. 72 57 52 37 32 a S.W 64mTERRACE < ay > w '-i .4 `6'�k" TIi187 .� 31 : 44 6U w 5 r K 7 us 1- i` a r k s y r .4 y y�j �1t 98 r 0 91 . '78 ,. 71 58' cs 51 38 31 a569. (S e4 ;r . - BitF :10✓a � 32, 45 58�ti ` :11 99f'. g st rY S O zN, 90 79 70 59 5 39 3 T ±; 20'!: n 33' 46 - 'S9 y16 4 6 $ 96 U H :801M 69 60 49 40 A 29 1eaRrt j4 47 60 H lo 3 a i 3 ! gro a 5s 9e re22 rn 35 48 Bl': BBi 81 . 68 61 48 41 28 e 7" t" ��a gp $ 10is tC23` 36 q9 62, ". 4 r$To 82 m 6T 62 4T 42 r7 2T N4�i3g� U ax 1<l> t� 24fi 37 50 6�! s 11J BQk 63:' 66 63 46 43 26 @?�1%x� +•° >:: h ` 12dfl 25' 3B 51 64J\ a xl,,.re�r w o1 LS t, 11'., .2fir. g9 2 85:' 84. 65 64 45 44 25 I w .. .. H S.W. 66th' STREET u W > Q ... i S.W. 66th TERRACE',., u . , '9 8' 7 G. 5 4 31 J32 1 10 njaji�ciiVgtdlY� 12 1 W 33 13 1S16171 SI4I3I2 1 1t Z1 • 9 7 1• 1 8 19 2 21 22 14 14 15 161718 i.0 474c, Z7 40 531" 3 t2 1.f, 28 41 '114 95.' D4� " 7a 55 54 35 34 1 ? +478 29 42 55d 11S ; 13 .�6rf x933 1764: 73 56 :53 38 33 `x1Tt.' v 30 43 56� j` w 112 Ar+l MI, `77. 72 57 52 37 32 a S.W 64mTERRACE < ay > w '-i .4 `6'�k" TIi187 .� 31 : 44 6U w 5 r K 7 us 1- i` a r k s y r .4 y y�j �1t 98 r 0 91 . '78 ,. 71 58' cs 51 38 31 a569. (S e4 ;r . - BitF :10✓a � 32, 45 58�ti ` :11 99f'. g st rY S O zN, 90 79 70 59 5 39 3 T ±; 20'!: n 33' 46 - 'S9 y16 4 6 $ 96 U H :801M 69 60 49 40 A 29 1eaRrt j4 47 60 H lo 3 a i 3 ! gro a 5s 9e re22 rn 35 48 Bl': BBi 81 . 68 61 48 41 28 e 7" t" ��a gp $ 10is tC23` 36 q9 62, ". 4 r$To 82 m 6T 62 4T 42 r7 2T N4�i3g� U ax 1<l> t� 24fi 37 50 6�! s 11J BQk 63:' 66 63 46 43 26 @?�1%x� +•° >:: h ` 12dfl 25' 3B 51 64J\ a xl,,.re�r w o1 LS t, 11'., .2fir. g9 2 85:' 84. 65 64 45 44 25 I w .. .. H S.W. 66th' STREET u W > Q ... i S.W. 66th TERRACE',., u . , '9 8' 7 G. 5 4 31 J32 1 10 11 12 1 �i'7O 33 13 1S16171 SI4I3I2 1 1t Z1 • 9 7 1• 1 8 19 2 21 22 14 S.W. 67th STREET w � U 1 PARK 3 W W oess�s 0U4® 8 7 • • 14 13 2 1 9 8 7 5 5 4 3 2 1 �i'7O 33 9 1 8 7 6 1 SI4I3I2 1 1t Z1 • 9 7 1• 10 11 12 13 14 15 161718 oess�s 0U4® i 8 7 • • 14 13 2 1 10 i • • 46 a43 • •• 171B �i'7O i 8 7 • • 14 13 2 1 10 i • • 46 a43 • •• 171B 9 8 7 6 5 14 13 2 1 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 171B 33 9 1 8 7 6 1 SI4I3I2 1 1t Z1 • 9 7 1• 7 2: W � I f . . .=�Z: fiF7• 0 � NX ta11,7¢i ppggpp pp ` ��Ftd0�I��mS7�� i t w pf J METR TAT10 J� •• r .3. w ? 20 STREET o G� 1B t9 • • • .� • 1 11 12 9 8 5.+ y S.W. 71st c S.W.�atST. > • • • • •i ' 15 m • • 1• • • L • I .. J:•,t617r �•16••O•- •2)•1 72- 1 1 2, 11 t y 1 2 3 a 1 1111 9 !: 1 01/1 l 3Ni ncnan S.W. 72nd STREEY .:. 1 . FIGURE:10 . _ FIND MR—NECESSITY` =:CITY OF SF T MIAMI�� 1 ' 1 � PAGE TEN FON INADEQUATE STREET LAYOUT Several blocks within the study area have streets that are not wide enough to maintain two- way i ' parking (Blocks 3- 17).'Some do not have adequate parking space t.o wa traffic flaw and meet the minimum zoning code requirements set forth by „the City., Narrow roads and streets do not allow for parking on the street and the lots in these ,areas do not have enough square footage to accommodate off street parking.Also the streets in blocks 37,38,39,40 &"4.8 feed into major streets or highways that are not conducive to adequate traffic flow. Twenty -two blocks or: 45% of,.the total blocks. in the. study area include streets with inadequate width to _ accommodate traffic flow and parking requirements'. Exhibit B (conditions survey) indicates the blocks affected by the inadequate street layout. HIGH CRIME RATES High crime rates demonstrate a.lack of adherence to the law and public'safety that deters continued economic development in an urea. Information on'eight types of crime was 'provid- ed by the City's Police Department. The report includes crimes committed during the period of January 1, 1994 through November 12th, 1995. They are: Grand theft, robbery, burglary, auto ry, sex offenses. A discussion of each will follow: theft, auto burglary, batte homicide, and ' The City's Report for 1.994.8 1995 indicates that the study'area has a higher level of crime in certain categories .than other, parts of the City (See Exhibit VI I). Forty -five incidents of crime, p ry: during!' the time peri January .1 1995 through were reported in the Bake ,Center area d urrn th od of . June 5, 1996. Grand Theft Twenty -seven of.the,blocks in the studyarea.or 55% of the total blocks include dwellings affected by grand theft. A high percentage. of the grand thefts occurred yin the central and southern part of the study area. Figure 11 map shows the blocks where grand theft was committed over a two year period. Robbery "The second,hi hest number. of blocks affected b crime in the stud area ' �9 Y y included . those where robberies;were committed..Thlrty -two blocks or 65% of all total blocks in the study area include robberies committed over a two year period. Sixty -seven percent of the 102 robberies committed in the City in 1994 and 50% of the 75 robberies committed in the City in 1995 were in the study area. Figure 12 map indicates the blocks where robberies were fie.✓ committed over a two year period. PAGE ELEVEN FON 'l Burglary The highest number of blocks affected by crime include those where burglaries were committed. Thirty -six blocks or 73 %, of all blocks-in the study, area were subjected to burglar-, ies. Forty -six percent or 256 burglaries committed, in 1994 and 34% or 292 burglaries commit- ted in'1995 were committed in the targeted area:-Figuro 13 shows the blocks where burglar- ies, were committed over a two year period.-" Auto Theft % :,Auto,theft is prevalent. throughout the study area. Twenty =one of;the blocks or: 43% of the total blocks in the study area include.those where'auto theft�wascommitted. Figure :1.4., - indicates where auto theft was committed over a two year,period. Auto Burglary ;Auto burglaries were committed proportionally throughout the study area. Twenty - 'seven ,blocks or 55% of, the total study . area include blocks where'aut6l burglaries were, com- mitted over a two eriod ear. . F y p igure,15 map'shows the'wide 'spread. - condition Battery hae n d Assau! is y e,aggravated third hi h est number of blocs affected by crime include those wher batteries and assaults were committed. Thirty -one of,the blocks or 63% of.the total study,; area include blocks where aggravated batteries and'. assaults were, ` committed overa.two year period. Figure 16 map shows the blocks affected. by these 'crimes: Homicides ,The only..murders in the City in 1994 (2 murders) and 1995 (1 murder) were'committed in the study area.. Three blocks or 1% of the total ,study. area include' blocks where .murders ..were. committed over- a wo year'period Figure'l'7 indicates.the'blocks where. these, murders occurred. Sex Offenses ,The only, sexual batteries in 1994 (3 sexual offenses) and 1995 (3 sexual offenses) were in the study,aiea. Fourblocks or`1 %of the total study'area.include blocks;where sexual 11 offenses were IL: ommitted over a two year period. Figure 18 shows the.blocks where these sexual - offenses were'co: mmitt ed: .. ... , 10 0, � S.W. 62nd STREET Grand Theft S.W. 62nd TERRACE one or more per block z 4;74 LU S.W. 63rd S1 > s 7 8 9 10 A�, 1 Ig all n 7s s3 a Ill 7' 13 7RI J3 Tffi �Kv � S.W. 63rd ST MV 2 1 3 M 13 74 • is 78 ?-, 3 ;s, .. IIN Lq 4 14. p7i —6 Z- S.W. 64th STREET *V-. 0-14"1 27 X11 , 40 53 "1 ts 3, 54 35 114 95 94 75' V-2A, $154, i 79.-�M 74—V, I& Isla 2azt T472 -iS 115 _L3 6 93 76 .'73t tj =V0, 53 36 to S.111 , .4 S� 56 uj 112 97 92 77 ,7r� 52 37 797571., 4-41 = — -;a— w Ul 4 4,5W, .+ 181 ?, .4 57 z III u 91 :78 51 2 6 C6 35 a -u 56 0 !Mwl )79, 7 -3 .5 ICL 39 u 49 4 90 29� 769. 109 00 a 1, fll(X� @9 21,,, .1: 34,,, �Ar i 60 2 114 35 £r 48 61 1 08 101 23.. 38 '49 62 107 102 37:.. "SO 63 ill — 1 0_3 W 106 103 1127:: '!Sit — .25!1 381, 64 -95— 105 104 -131.1 26, •52 o S.W. 66th STREET Z II 9 6S1] LU > S.W. 66th TERRACE 9 • .• 6 17 7 6 .,5 4 3 Z* 9 8 7 6 watin "WA-M nommiiiliiiiiiiiiiiii 1 - -31 12 7jY7 15 16 1718 10 2021 22 12 13 iS 'Ae 1: Al is if 1q' 9 a i I' - V,, a , i , " S.W. 57th STREET s. Uj W uj 9 al. Vtk,1;, K W S.W. 68th STREET -C S.W. 68th STREET..." o. 111111711111 • .• 6 17 8 0 6 13 12 1 9 8 7 6 watin "WA-M nommiiiliiiiiiiiiiiii 1 48 1 41 U) F67 '62;,k 47 42 ui r '142 66'' It6a 0 :46 43 5S7 4401� E45 44 man Iw= 0*11111 oil /ems+ �� S.W. TOM S REET EM K= 5.• • .• 6 17 8 0 6 13 12 1 9 8 7 6 S 4 3 2 1 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 48 1 41 U) F67 '62;,k 47 42 ui r '142 66'' It6a 0 :46 43 5S7 4401� E45 44 man Iw= 0*11111 oil /ems+ �� S.W. TOM S REET EM K= 5.• • .• 6 17 8 0 6 13 12 1 4 - is 14 11 2 J42 W METRO TATIO W v .7 7 S.W. 71st STREET CL. 54 44 4s S.W. 71st S7 .8 19 .4 M 112 0 .9 • 5 5 14•:13 10 77- i 7 17" 17 3 15 '1 ...2 115 T141?, ]�!! T11 q 7. U) . . . � 2 2 3 4 11.1,149 -414 S.W. 72nd STREET -.-FIGURE11 CITY OF S MIAMI FINDING ORNECESSITY,.. tu tu �-7 S.W. 62nd STREET 13 12 S.W. 64th STREET 1 4 1 5 7. 3 1 6 29 30 31 32 27 38 39 40 1 h, ,27.rt M401 41 Igo I T 5 6 rru w ri 1. 1, IIJ 1 12 V 031 IX �2 .,252Wf IP�411ik _29UJ 5'.4211.1 S.W. 62nd TERRACE ='2 11 5 4 3� 1 2 7 C78 LA Armed Robberies & S.W. 64th TERRACE 9s, k 1931 12ZI ■ 3 10 S.W. 62nd TERRACE 57: e-77 Strong Aff n Robberies 9 4 N 58 (111194-1111=5)� 167 11*1111109* M.- 0:0. - 0-6 5 4 us uj — one or more per block ; , 1 1 617 -- >< 0 .2 ! 1. * 63M ST ITT) 4 10 79 -IM, Z4416 I -n �a �� .47 00,; as so 69 3 so 14%. �46i ;S - 2 [6111 N.W. 3-1 �131� 00 —,2 S.W. 63rd ST 61 .Mw4f-, 23: 3 12 72 73 74 1� is n 7y 3 mW �. .. I 313 MV V49, im 102t 87 82 U) 67162' 63rd P ACE -w 4k 4 uj Ali 0 31 50 TE 93 48o i�,C` 26• grg ID11 1"t Mi' 6 i 1 :. 5 S.W. 111111111 13 12 S.W. 64th STREET 7 6' a 4 eta ' �g "k 1 h, ,27.rt M401 41 e— ----N e-- 94 IS 74 55 9=N 031 IX �2 .,252Wf IP�411ik _29UJ 5'.4211.1 93 76 73 56 1�u "13. 18 S.W. 64th TERRACE A 2" 92 77 72' us — 57: 9�21 '44P iqg� u 91 78 71 I , 58 =iU 5&4v 7 > 'a vu 70 J 59 0 '3 3=3i --48- 4 u '4 -:1 t�)P A. 8 .47 00,; as so 69 3 so 14%. �46i ;S ?35„!f -'k,48 as al 68 6; 61 .Mw4f-, 23: XV� L mW �. .. I 313 MV V49, im 102t 87 82 U) 67162' '47i �Jl 11,w i1,24,v 63,1, 0 31 50 lit 66 ibal:lm' $a 83 66 93 48o i�,C` 26• Mi' 35i"F 51 i 1 :. Lu S.W. 65 04' 135 84 65 �H, STREET 64, Q7 251 24 66th 111111111 13 12 6,54'21 JIM111111 9 8 7 6' a 4 3 2, 1 h, 41 Zi "METR TAT] 0 1; 1112 13 14 15 16 17 18 21 A 111111111 13 12 6,54'21 JIM111111 mwm �������6FI 11 2 h, mm 111111111 13 12 6,54'21 I �11111wi 75 14 11 2 h, 21w Zi "METR TAT] 0 21 A 111111111 13 12 I �11111wi 75 14 11 2 h, 21w "METR TAT] 0 Y: z > u) w L) . 1111M �.. ,.,. OEM OW4-1= NW4;m swum gig S.W. 70th STREET S.W. 70th STREET R31 it 4" 10 1-9 a 7- 9; u[i 0 1,r , 6 — 0— S.W. 71st STREET 96 20 1 44 0 u tT 7, 20,* 5— its > S.W. 71 etsT 15 12 9 5 111111 48 �7 F7 Q, 14'13 10 4— V '2' 1 111 2 3 4 S.W_ 72nd STREET -,;FIGURE 12 "FIOITM5 5CtSSiTy, CITY OF S.607H MIAMI IL 4A S N t(o 13 12 I 75 14 11 2 h, — 0— S.W. 71st STREET 96 20 1 44 0 u tT 7, 20,* 5— its > S.W. 71 etsT 15 12 9 5 111111 48 �7 F7 Q, 14'13 10 4— V '2' 1 111 2 3 4 S.W_ 72nd STREET -,;FIGURE 12 "FIOITM5 5CtSSiTy, CITY OF S.607H MIAMI IL 4A S N t(o h, 21w "METR TAT] 0 21 A — 0— S.W. 71st STREET 96 20 1 44 0 u tT 7, 20,* 5— its > S.W. 71 etsT 15 12 9 5 111111 48 �7 F7 Q, 14'13 10 4— V '2' 1 111 2 3 4 S.W_ 72nd STREET -,;FIGURE 12 "FIOITM5 5CtSSiTy, CITY OF S.607H MIAMI IL 4A S N t(o M S.W. 62nd STREET S.W. am STREET 6 5 4 3 2 1 41 16 11 121 14 15 15 17 1 S.W. 62nd TERRACE tw 1 119 7 721,)5 14 1 3 1 2 1 Ij 4 311 -7 IRT111111 EMM S.W. 64 15 Crime y 20 2122 ;e f 1V 444444 MP 92 rA w % 1'. 3 1 S.W. 62nd TERRACE S.W. 68th MEET % * - 01 4A 5 Z TT xg"q 757 7r: r_5 RR Residentla I & commerci� one at more per block =.71 Giro ST +1141A 11 1 14 Ld.,4tt ;_ -S.W. 63rd ST WT I A ,. 2' 3 2 13 01 t iji� � i . '71 4� 1, It . 7$ ;, � 3i '3 4 4 )��2 11 w _N't MA S.W. 63rd TEIF AC E vi 15 HIM met 7U 6 .10 9 i�hls.- "1 2 2 14 5 27M� S.W; ��40, 64th 53 STREET.. 45 94 7574 S4 3S rZ M 3 3 Is, 41'j 54 55, uS '-"P3! — S3 76' 63 30 S; S.W. 64th TERRACE 4 -7" —18 0 !300 '143.''. 1. 56 — ul 431 ' ' 92 77 52 37 It 4 -.3 7E7 T-7,744,lTf — -' z " .1 1981). w 91 78 W a at ;a—,. 7. •6 7 -19 '20 -X45:j3 53 39 8 21J :33.:.! 11'47 60 00�_Vj aq 0 1 1 40 2, 3:..34 ; 048 61 as, .81 4 3 48 41 10 t-249 62 87 BZ . , " , , V) 47 42 to 0 2 24 3n, so 63 Or pa, .163 I., 85. 83 767,, 1�1 45 43 _j 1[25 13 .6 30�� �:51! 39:€ 52 64 65 85 84 45 44 Lu M - S.W. 66th STREET - S.W. am STREET 6 5 4 3 2 1 41 16 11 121 14 15 15 17 1 z ui r... 6 1 MAN mo�om 757, 771— ������V T 4 311 -7 IRT111111 EMM S.W. 64 15 to y 20 2122 ;e f 1V PARK S.W. 68th MEET % S.W. am STREET 6 5 4 3 2 1 41 16 11 121 14 15 15 17 1 S.W. 87th STREET rLW. 68th STREET ' • 13 12 MAN mo�om 757, 771— ������V T 4 311 -7 IRT111111 EMM S.W. 87th STREET rLW. 68th STREET ' • 13 12 757, 771— �'������l�seQd0�0E T 4 311 -7 3'21 1011 ._1 2 4 15 17 4 18 19 20 2122 ;e f 1V S.W. 87th STREET rLW. 68th STREET ' • In 13 12 �'������l�seQd0�0E 15 14 N ikon 2 1011 111 MEMO In 13 12 M INE, 15 14 11 2 �in0it�iiA N MIN 11 mom E3u on i. v i -0. w u ''METR TATIO 7 S.W.•71st STREET 19 a 1 0 1.- ... I. 14411 An s !.t7 777 14� 13* 10 7Z-7 47 170! �S a. V, 71— CD M llit'l 9 (n f 312 11 .4 M 9 10 S.W. 72nd STREET CD FIGURE 13 _'SSITY. CITY OF SOUTH MIAIA.': f: O 77a Mai N., tu W r 13 12 15 14 11 2 i. v i -0. w u ''METR TATIO 7 S.W.•71st STREET 19 a 1 0 1.- ... I. 14411 An s !.t7 777 14� 13* 10 7Z-7 47 170! �S a. V, 71— CD M llit'l 9 (n f 312 11 .4 M 9 10 S.W. 72nd STREET CD FIGURE 13 _'SSITY. CITY OF SOUTH MIAIA.': f: O 77a Mai N., tu W r S.W. 62nd STREET 1 I 2 I 3(D 4 1 5 1 6 I 129 1 30.1 31 I 11 S.W* 63rd N . 1i rset s tt ni6 � tan � 4 t� a� . -�•� 1 �. S.W.64thTERRACE , i 3 2 �Pxn�r��.xaY a � ,, ►- `6i ,"� a• of 35 Cr � 5 rr A� cO r y . J�IPI,25 a3a it Z High Crime Rates i W S.W.62nd TERRACE c�h b Auto Then .. I w ... 7 6 5 4 o UWa:ii�'�r�r�i���� tz n one or more per block 6 7 6 9 10 r �+ ;s h D "'u r*^�g 16. PARK S.W. 63rd ST } It }y � 5 ' 16 7 5 4 3 2 1 rIx y. 4 t `�i•t't I , B T 8 9 10 S.W. 64th STREET L. 42_ 55 ti5 114 113 95) 96.° 94 93' 7$ T6` r74755 73' S6 Pli�� 63„ $35�' ,3$i �Pxn�r��.xaY a � ,, ►- `6i ,"� a• of 35 Cr � 5 rr A� cO r y . J�IPI,25 a3a it Z ,t j,;k v31 t�f1' ul t i W 4 6 +r't.•, 6 b S.W. 6( .. I w ... 7 6 5 4 o UWa:ii�'�r�r�i���� tz n ���'14 � ' j• ' +��t 51:� A•r i,, �,r V PARK 12 '1314151617 S.W. 68th STREET I } It }y -Y i yet 35 t `�i•t't I , UE , J S.W. 68th STREET te�n� i S.w 69th STREET I /�C \j6�((39)X1\Yo 0��,'•.. t ! .... �i 4 6 7 8 9 10 111111aw 9 8 7 6 5 4 o UWa:ii�'�r�r�i���� te�n� i S.w 69th STREET I /�C \j6�((39)X1\Yo 0��,'•.. t ! .... �i ImmM QIMP �OQQIQQQ ������1�������i♦���� IN STIN IMMUR NESTIM �e1 lllli111� �:le��laii+1is�:��aa+ ' •/� loll ®_ . �® 1I� nnu 5 4 6 7 8 9 10 111111aw 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1' tz n '1 1 it 12 '1314151617 16 -Y ImmM QIMP �OQQIQQQ ������1�������i♦���� IN STIN IMMUR NESTIM �e1 lllli111� �:le��laii+1is�:��aa+ ' •/� loll ®_ . �® 1I� nnu 5 4 6 7 8 9 10 111111aw � slam NPAM wFrM ImmM QIMP �OQQIQQQ ������1�������i♦���� IN STIN IMMUR NESTIM �e1 lllli111� �:le��laii+1is�:��aa+ ' •/� loll ®_ . �® 1I� nnu 5 4 6 7 8 9 10 2 ' �51a t3 tz n '1 J a+;M ETR TATtO� J 22,E 20 :. 21A.4 4 c. r 1 44 0' 8 8 N at STREET o OS W.71 18 >' S W 71 s �� 46t 74r ;13 3 10 . r w 11' 12 3 •1017A 2. 7 r:, 3! 1 4 , 1 :. .., rs , 1 "'2.3 4 11611111 19 + Ni51413121 1021 : �S_W.''72nd STREET, FIGURE 14 j CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI a ; FINDING; • ECESSITY ` ='�R`� I 0 w z W a r ("'D d01�H u r ■ t q 9 6 7 6 5 31 4 3 2 1 10 it 12 29 30 31 437 '36 39 1 S.W. 64th TERRACE i 4, 5 6 1 12 1 5 e 4' 3 2 t o 0 A. •" o tt Icy ! ; vi Z i :girt. Nigh Crime Rates . a is +'err( x'A, F r., 3 S.W. 62nd TERRACE' ' � c � N 4 9 4 „ s nt NIP', n j 2 .1 N. , _ ... ....,�ii.Fid' • +'� , PAR S.W. 66th STREET 1 w one or more per Clock', u r ■ t q 9 6 7 6 5 31 4 3 2 1 10 it 12 29 30 31 437 '36 39 40 16 17 18 19 2021 22 14 fl� 1 12 1 5 e 4' 3 2 t o c o e A. •" z tt z Nigh Crime Rates . 3, 10 3 S.W. 62nd TERRACE' 'Vehicle Burglaries 4 9 4 „ s nt t n j 2 .1 (1/1/94- 11/12195) , 1 w one or more per Clock', 3, g ,2 o 4 t 14 L 4 0 2 13 2 S W. 63rd ST 3 11 gj 3 3 314 12 # 3 5 4 3 2 1 6 y 4 y '4 1t �4 15 9 I, e 9 5 6 '7 8 9. 10. 7 1 7 S.W.'64th'STREET l5 41 54 114 95 74 55 2 3 28 15 29 • _ 42 55 its 113 96 73 56 t d11 4360 4 17 6 30 " 43 56 - "' w 112 97' 72 57 s5z 5 18 a 31 44' S7 111 96 U [27 _ 71 58 v 61'i38W' 6 19 32 45' S8 11 B9 J 0 < 70 59 0 37 8 20 0 21 „ 3 33' 34 46 1'47 S9 60 116 r� n 109 00 69 60'. $ X49 40;' „ 9 22' vi 35 48 61 3 1D8 101' 3 as A 81 � 68 at 3 `44 �41x 10 23` 36 49 62 y 107 •102 N BT 'j 62• 67 62 y r4T,, X42: rn i27;S 37 5D 63 111 1D6 107 86' 83" '66 63 46' 4y'�;i 26 12 13 25 26 38 51 39 52 64 65 105 104 85' 84' 65 64 S:W.66th S STREET u r ■ t q 9 6 7 6 5 31 4 3 2 1 10 it 12 13 15 16 17 18 19 2021 22 14 i + 1111111111111111��� 1�� +� +'�'��r� +'�" !a NOUN! NNIzall ;�Q��QQQo000QQQQ ..�..,+ �w offm MOM ®� 110A�s Q0�® 13® on © . ,,.MET R TATlO :'G J� 2VF' rK4-O 1 0 v 7 7 S.W. 71st STREET M. 0 19 20.4.. 6-4, 45 18 w . f 1 .il. •8 6 S.W. 71stST. > 19 +' B y . 1S• '12 0 .9r 5 48 14 :13 3 10 N ! °' 11 3 di h J. 16 17 n a ; 16 +:: 4p'• 9i•1..'• . 12 a .,. t " 152 t 721w 1 2341tr19to dm 15f4 13 12 71 10 2 i S.W. 72nd STREET FIGURE 15 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI FiNDiNG,OF: ECESSIT`(r w 2 W i 4 t n H N go'-poll I till fl� ,,.MET R TATlO :'G J� 2VF' rK4-O 1 0 v 7 7 S.W. 71st STREET M. 0 19 20.4.. 6-4, 45 18 w . f 1 .il. •8 6 S.W. 71stST. > 19 +' B y . 1S• '12 0 .9r 5 48 14 :13 3 10 N ! °' 11 3 di h J. 16 17 n a ; 16 +:: 4p'• 9i•1..'• . 12 a .,. t " 152 t 721w 1 2341tr19to dm 15f4 13 12 71 10 2 i S.W. 72nd STREET FIGURE 15 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI FiNDiNG,OF: ECESSIT`(r w 2 W i 4 t n H N go'-poll till ,,.MET R TATlO :'G J� 2VF' rK4-O 1 0 v 7 7 S.W. 71st STREET M. 0 19 20.4.. 6-4, 45 18 w . f 1 .il. •8 6 S.W. 71stST. > 19 +' B y . 1S• '12 0 .9r 5 48 14 :13 3 10 N ! °' 11 3 di h J. 16 17 n a ; 16 +:: 4p'• 9i•1..'• . 12 a .,. t " 152 t 721w 1 2341tr19to dm 15f4 13 12 71 10 2 i S.W. 72nd STREET FIGURE 15 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI FiNDiNG,OF: ECESSIT`(r w 2 W i 4 t n H N S.W. 62nd STREET 31 13 37 38 1391401, '2 8 5'[4:1.]. �21 �Z- A Aggravated Batteries 3. S.W.62ndTERRACE &Assaults 4 `4g (111f94- 11/12!95)1 U one or more per block 2 S.W. 63rd ST 3' 3i 7.37 Ui 4 -i S.W. 64th STREET ' 28 i41: 54 114 95 94 7574bSa t64 N91 75 'Im a55 119 88 O Its 0 IV31624:1: Md HfZ 4�, 39 fr• Z tu > l 47 S.W .66thTERRACE 7—, pi _70-V 10 fi> Ic 9876S4321 a. 7 831 14 '3 2 ' 151473t 15 16 17113 19 20 21 7 22 1, 11 12 1314 15 16 17 I8 R. �+l���N�lyEEE iIIIMWIIIfiII� ;3 S.W. 64th TERRACE - - 70 31 13 37 38 1391401, '2 8 5'[4:1.]. �21 �Z- A Aggravated Batteries 3. S.W.62ndTERRACE &Assaults 4 `4g (111f94- 11/12!95)1 U one or more per block 2 S.W. 63rd ST 3' 3i 7.37 Ui 4 -i S.W. 64th STREET ' 28 i41: 54 114 95 94 7574bSa t64 N91 75 'Im a55 119 88 O Its 0 IV31624:1: Md HfZ 4�, 39 fr• Z tu > l 47 S.W .66thTERRACE 7—, pi _70-V 10 fi> Ic 9876S4321 a. 7 831 14 '3 2 ' 151473t 15 16 17113 19 20 21 7 22 III,. Filyw PARK; S.W.69thSTREET, INNUMMUM tiros A �kiw q�111q�111� �+�� 4�0� mom OEM 1111111 S.W. I 10 fi> Ic 9876S4321 ;;12:i LU tiiti ' 151473t 71 1, 11 12 1314 15 16 17 I8 R. �+l���N�lyEEE INNUMMUM tiros A �kiw q�111q�111� �+�� 4�0� mom OEM 1111111 S.W. I 10 fi> Ic 0119B191B ;;12:i LU tiiti ' INNUMMUM tiros A �kiw q�111q�111� �+�� 4�0� mom OEM 1111111 S.W. I 10 fi> Ic 0119B191B ;;12:i LU M ETR v- , ' 151473t 71 �+l���N�lyEEE iIIIMWIIIfiII� INNUMMUM tiros A �kiw q�111q�111� �+�� 4�0� mom OEM 1111111 S.W. I S.W. 71st STREET,' CL 0 7 T, 10 'o, ti S.W. I sr. 15 12 9: 5 14 13 •10 4 U2 =1 In 10 fi> Ic -125;*. ;;12:i LU M ETR v- , ' 151473t 71 S.W. 71st STREET,' CL 0 7 T, 10 'o, ti S.W. I sr. 15 12 9: 5 14 13 •10 4 U2 =1 In fi> Ic -125;*. ;;12:i LU M ETR v- , '13'j S.W. 71st STREET,' CL 0 7 T, 10 'o, ti S.W. I sr. 15 12 9: 5 14 13 •10 4 U2 =1 In 12 T U; Hs xtt -111 SSW. 72nd STREET FIGURE 16 .7 CITY OF SOUTH, MIAMI qL0f.:NECESSITY 0 -125;*. ;;12:i 24Vu- '13'j 12 T U; Hs xtt -111 SSW. 72nd STREET FIGURE 16 .7 CITY OF SOUTH, MIAMI qL0f.:NECESSITY 0 9a ,till 7 6 5 4 4C 9 a S.W. 64th STREET I MU M F1465 IMMIN T7mf-4 Is Is 1718 19 20 21 all �:������� 0W0 214 ©rQOOV �° 16 oo��0000����sss sde o® 22 U; 12 is 16 PURER MMWM' High Crime Rates 9a ,till 7 6 5 4 4C 9 a S.W. 64th STREET 5 41 T7mf-4 Is Is 1718 19 20 21 22 214 14 16 - 9 22 U; 12 is 16 High Crime Rates S.W. Bind TERRACE 14 27 271 Homicides tu 12 1] ' "2 1 J9 z 1 W 2 4 CL _d ST .8L 511 to 2 3 -if-- a 9 41 114 7 a 94 5 9a ,till 7 6 5 4 4C 9 a S.W. 64th STREET 5 41 T7mf-4 Is Is 1718 19 20 21 22 214 14 16 - 9 22 U; 12 is 16 � 17 7 18 1 14 27 271 40 2 is -if-- — 41 54 114 95 94 5 -74; 55 54 35 16 9 29 42 55 55 115 lis 113 96' -L3 6 73 56 53 36 S.W. 94th TERRACE 4 17 Wo 3a� a 43 5s 56 ul 112 97 92. 77 72'1 57 52 52 37 7— 1-8 C J C6 a 31 1 44 S7 -58-7 Z = .7— 11 98 uj u 91,- 78 z -- 71 59 Ow '51 51 33 3 ► 5 6 6 19 32 3 2 45 LU :5 , -- 5 — I zu 33 46 z 11 99 CL 5 5 39 0 a D 21 34 41 so 60 In 1 09 00 .89 so 9 60 9 49 40 5 — 9 22 3S 1 48 r it �- lot as at 1 48 61 -48 41 70— 2-3 38 49 Q 10 7 102 87 82 U) 67 7 62 47 42 d It 24 37 M 50 63 — 117 106 3 103 or 85 83 6 .66 63 — 46 43 3 12 2s 38 51 64 m t3 26 39 r-65— JOS 104 85 84 '6S 64 45 44 uj S.W. 66th STREET 9a ,till 7 6 5 4 4C 9 a 10 3 5 41 T7mf-4 Is Is 1718 19 20 21 22 214 14 16 - 9 22 U; 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 10 1112 13114 15 16 17 la -S.W.67thSTREET 133 9 8 716 5• 4 3 2 1 PARK w IT , s , U - S.W. 68th STREET ) C , S.W. 68th STREET MIA OF& Eli= Mwq;w �� 11 1.111, �d�ai� +i���►��y MM �Xlw , "I MEMA on EMU 6 26 11 M� 9 a 7 6 5 41 31711 2 MUM EMU! 9 '17 35 23 14 16 - 9 22 U; MIA OF& Eli= Mwq;w �� 11 1.111, �d�ai� +i���►��y MM �Xlw , "I MEMA on EMU 6 26 11 M� 9 a 7 6 5 41 31711 2 MUM EMU! 9 '17 ®�I1�11i�lri��1I 23 14 16 - 9 22 10 11 12 is 16 � 17 7 18 MIA OF& Eli= Mwq;w �� 11 1.111, �d�ai� +i���►��y MM �Xlw , "I MEMA on EMU 6 26 11 M� 4 0�!l����ls�s00leBl 15 18 2 MUM EMU! MIA OF& Eli= Mwq;w �� 11 1.111, �d�ai� +i���►��y MM �Xlw , "I MEMA on EMU 6 26 11 U; ..19 4 0�!l����ls�s00leBl 15 18 2 1 13 9 '17 ®�I1�11i�lri��1I 23 MIA OF& Eli= Mwq;w �� 11 1.111, �d�ai� +i���►��y MM �Xlw , "I MEMA on EMU 31 30 METRO ATM ;2 2 29 3 28 21 4 27 Q 7 S.W. 71st STREET 1 0. u 7 L 13 19 cu 1 11 T 8456 LO 15 12 9, 5 .7 IST. 14 13 3 7-0 3 17 ;20 6 26 11 U; ..19 4 3 15 18 2 1 31 30 METRO ATM ;2 2 29 3 28 21 4 27 Q 7 S.W. 71st STREET 1 0. u 7 L 13 19 cu 1 11 T 8456 LO 15 12 9, 5 .7 IST. 14 13 3 7-0 3 17 ;20 5 26 11 U; ..19 6 25 12 18 7 24 13 9 '17 '-B 23 14 16 - 9 22 15 i 12 11 T., 1 2 3 4 5 15 141t , 3111 021 201 111 ; S.W. 72nd STREET FIGURE 17 M—r7 CITY OF E9 Z S.W. 62nd STREET 1 1 2 1 3(1'%4 1 5 1 8 t" 9 8171615141312 1 to a 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 U t kn . ... S.W. 67th STREET 33 . y, owl td IMI �u 11 . ml�lll��u�u�� d�aii�e��►�' � �� . ®1 Q�B® m® Ulm on ®m 7 6 5 31 4 3 2 3 : {. 8 ;.•13r' 1518 9 87 8 5 4 3 2 1 tit .+• 41 38 39 40 12 1 10 1112 1314 15 15 17 1B i t" 9 8171615141312 1 to a 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 U t kn . ... S.W. 67th STREET 33 . y, owl td IMI �u 11 . ml�lll��u�u�� d�aii�e��►�' � �� . ®1 Q�B® m® Ulm on ®m 7 6 5 31 4 3 2 3 : {. 8 ;.•13r' 1518 1718 19 20 21 22 14 29 30 31 32 37 38 39 40 12 1 i f -L 2 11': r 2 8 5 4 3 2 1 High Crime Rates 3 10 3 S V. 62nd TERRACE ; Sexual Offenses 5• e 4 S 4- 3 S Y 2 2" 6 t< 6 9 < 3 U1 g 6 7 8 9 10 A 4 11 C6 2' 1 to a a 1. n t 7 2. 13 „ 2 S.W. 63rd ST 3 .1D, :3 3 Yl l 5 y 14 4 �� vi 4 5 4 3 2 1 6 9. i4' 5 10 5 15 • S'.. .,.. 6 9 7. ti .1 I r S.W. 64th STREET :... „A 29 A01 A 41 53 54 114 85 • 94 75 ; 74 SS 54 35 34 2 75 3 16' i 29 142 -F-7 5 OS 113 96 93 76' 73 56 S3 35 33 4 17, tWi 30 =' 43 S6 In ;112 97 92 T7 72 ST 52 37 32 5 18 4 31 • 44 5T z 111 98 v 91 ”' 78 � ° 71 58 tWi .. 51 38 ¢ 31 6 18 $ 32 .145 55 u�i 7 20 0 33 46:59 16 t.5 11 99 a 90 4 T9 ! < 70 59 4 ' S 39 U 3 8° D 27 3 34 1 47 6D a 109 00 89 80 ; 69 60: n 49 40 5 n 2g 9' 22 ai 35 48 61 tOB 101 3 BB Bl 6B 61, 3 48 41 28 t6 10' J6 49 62" y '107 102 to 87 82 : Li '6T 62 H 47 42 w 27 1 24 37 • ':50 63 111 1D6 103 B8 63 66 63 46 4J 26 12 25 Je r 51 64 9 52 65 105 104 SS 84 -: 65 64 45 44 25 z. S.W. 66th STREET " a t" 9 8171615141312 1 to a 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 U t kn . ... S.W. 67th STREET 33 . y, owl td IMI �u 11 . ml�lll��u�u�� d�aii�e��►�' � �� . ®1 Q�B® m® Ulm on ®m 7 6 5 31 4 3 2 3 : {. 8 ;.•13r' 1518 1718 19 20 21 22 14 t" 9 8171615141312 1 to a 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 U t kn . ... S.W. 67th STREET 33 . y, owl td IMI �u 11 . ml�lll��u�u�� d�aii�e��►�' � �� . ®1 Q�B® m® Ulm on ®m LU j METRO TATIO 1 0 F .7 r 1st STREET a _ 5O 1 t9 20 201-: 5 .. .' S.W. S.W � 8 I 15 72 e 9 5. io1� S.W. 148 L S's tB 7 a n 10 `G.,. 0...17 1 , a 3 J' ..' 16 17 tt a � •.18 11.% 3' 1 1 2 1 t 12 1 w 1 2 3 4 frrt 9 tff�• 15 14 13 12 11 1D: S.W. 72nd STREET FIGURE 18 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI FINDING'.O— .F ESSITYI i a� LU j METRO TATIO 1 0 F .7 r 1st STREET a _ 5O 1 t9 20 201-: 5 .. .' S.W. S.W � 8 I 15 72 e 9 5. io1� S.W. 148 L S's tB 7 a n 10 `G.,. 0...17 1 , a 3 J' ..' 16 17 tt a � •.18 11.% 3' 1 1 2 1 t 12 1 w 1 2 3 4 frrt 9 tff�• 15 14 13 12 11 1D: S.W. 72nd STREET FIGURE 18 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI FINDING'.O— .F ESSITYI i N 0 PAGE TWELVE FON CONCLUSION Basis,for finding, of Necessity The necessity for redevelopment in the= proposed study area is related to the substan tial indication that blight exist in the area. Throughout this report,, shown on the. maps I and condition survey, blight criteria was examined and related back to, those conditions that were found in the study area. The blight criteria which parallels the conditions found in the area include building deterioration within 59 %° of the study area; site deterioration and deficiency withi y ry within 76% of the, study o 4 , drainage n 7,6 / of the stud area unsanita conditions a area deficiencies within 59 /° of the study area, diversity of ownership'.within 78% of the, study area; age of structures with 40 plus years'within 41% of.the study;area; violation of.the property,, maintenance code within 57% of the study area; non- conforming unit size to lot size within 33% of the study area; non - conforming parking within 55% of the study. area; closed buildinas within lfi% of the study area; vacant lots within 55% of the study area; and high crime rates which include: grand theft - 55 %, robberies 65 %, burglary - 73 %, auto theft,.- 43 %, auto bur - glaries - ,55 %, batteries 63 %, homicides'= 1 %, and sexual offenses - ;1 %. This information was gathered from both'field observation and review /assessment of.public records & reports from the City of Soutf Miami or Dade County,' documented in this report and in the Addendum: Blight Determination The study area was examined such that'each block was classified as meeting or not meeting the blight criteria. To meet the blight criteria,- a particular_ block. must have either.(a) building deterioration or site deterioration of 20% or more, or (b) at least have three of the fo1- 1owing, blight conditions: unsanitary conditions; drainage.deficiency; diversity.of ownership:, structures with on age of 40 years or 'more; -violation of property maintenance codes; non conforming unit size to lot size; non - conforming parking; closed,,buildings; vacant lots; and high crime. rates for_grand theft, robbery,_ burglary, auto -theft, auto burglary, battery,. homicide .,:.and sexual offenses: y ° t least The condition serve shows the-blocks that meet 20 /° deterioration and /or a three other blight criteria test. Forty -six of the blocks -in the survey area meet ther above men- . ;tioned test. This constitutes 95% of all, blocks (46 out of 49 blocks in the study area)., Most blocks (42).met.more than one part of the test.*; PAGE THIRTEEN FON Extent of Blight In order to explain and visualize the extent of blight found. in the study area as it relates to the blight criteria set forth by the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969, Chapter' 163, Part 111', a sequence- of'map's were prepared (Fgure ;1 through 18)., Each map shows the blocks affected'by one of the 18 criteria depicted in the conditions survey, For example, Figure 5 shows the 38, blocks that met the criteria for diversity of ownership-(5 or' more own -' ers per block) Ih ions survey grid (Exhibit B) is :a composite of all conditions, found withinthe� area. On''the�aver " ,age each block-in the study area was affected by;_10.2.different blighting + substantial and.prevalentin the,study area: conditions. This indicates that�blight is s Proposed Boundary r .. The'eastern boundary (Red Road);!s a section -line street as well as the eastern boundary"of the city. The western(SW, 62nd Avenue) and southern boundaries (Sunset Drive) or half - section +streets: The northern are''also section fine boundary does extend at the west - ern:ort�on of tfie area to'SW 62nd Street; section line street. However, this, p � which is,not a se variation occurs to include'several of the City's most severally, blighted residential blocks: Within the defined boundaries, 46 of the 49 blocks included evidence of at least three' b!ightmg conditions, inclusive 'of blocks 48 and 49. In all cases, there'is a distinctly different and /or'better quality to the areas'on.the other side of the, Iproposed boundary. illustratively: As stated above; Red'Road is.the eastern boundary of the City 'of South Miami, how- ever,' even if' not .the area on its eastern, side, is distinctly, different. consisting of the' University -, property`and to- the: north of that high .value residential, the streets of which are now blocked off for ttirough'traffic. The eastern side of SW 62nd Avenue is characterized with residential uses north of h t 69t et In contrast `commercial development is.. permitted along the frontage on the west re , Sid e: Furter, the character of residential,develo behind that co mmercial frontage is distinctly different thanon the east side of the Avenue, involving larger units on larger lots. Finally while the homes in the first block or so,west of 62nd are din some cases shabby, the area becomes increasingly well -kept and attractive as you move westwardly` toward 67th Avenue. EO . The area along the south side of Sunset west of U.S. 1, is distinctly different from that on the north side including institutional uses (City Hall and the Library) and higher quality medical and commercial structures. (0 PAGE FOURTEEN FON East of U.S. 1, the nature of use on the south side of Sunset is consistent with that on J the north side. However,; several of the most significant blighting conditions on the, north side do not exist on, the south side: 'Specifically, the parking lots south of the Sunset Drive frontage provide for adequate parking and the,street layout is basically. consistent with the general area's normal grid pattern; with no situations such as that at SW 58th Avenue and 71st call use e half section -fine streets Street. Planning in Dade County: has" histori section -line. and. ha y d as the boundaries for planning because the y are con sidered the backbone.of, the County's street layout. U.S. 1 is;, within the County's,organizational structure, an exception a(;street which does not conform with the basic layout of the County: Its alignment creates, a number. of awkward situations as blocks 37,38;39,40 and 48 prove: Further,:the.City e South Miami considers the road of a: negative force "dividing the City in away that may have b en acontributing - factor to the b!i htin of t g g- he: areas to the northwest of it because. of the separation it created between that area and the rest 'of, the City,, including „the central business district. Successful redevelop - ment of the. proposed . r �� area has a better prospect for success �f the City is considered in a more unified way,' emanating put of its'central business.district Red Road functions at a level of service below that recommended for Dade County. Efforts to revitalize the areas'of the proposed redevelopment area north of U.S. 1 that front on or which are generally adjacent to Red Road, will obviously impact,that artery, with the proper - ties immediately south . U:S. 1:feeling:the first level of impact. Accordingly, the area should be planned to a unified wa P Y The proposed boundaries are congruent with'those of, the South. Miami Target area which was established, over ten years ago_and continuously updated by Metro -Dade Office of Community & Economic Development.. Accordingly, precedent exists for considering the defined area as a planning unit. Further, it will'be administratively easier to continue to do so, ensuing that money's,coming into the area through the CBDG program as well as from TIF and other sources are used with maximum efficiency and benefit, the objective of both the proposed CRA'and bade• County's Office of.Community Development. S.W. 62nd STREET N ��� ®� Ao��000�����ses ede 29 30 ,31 32� 71 -I- 8 7 NO���lr� I-�..L18J,� 2111 •10 mmmmmm�= EXHIBIT S.W.'64th'STREET �i „ 40 53 , I4 6 41 54 3 16 9 114 ONE 42 55 tIS 113 86. 43 56 Proposed Boundry for a Community &W.62ndTE.aRACE 112 Reinvestment Area (CRA), 44' 57 Z 2 98 ' U 45 City of South Miami 5 3 2 1 x 46 1 114 t 11 9 9 9 1 47 601 : ,; 3 109 g6 2 48 min 8 9 10 G ®� 49 5-7 y = . ST 3 ; ,6.. 110' ', 3 �U. ,, , ,105 a 5 4 9 2 1 9 52 4 WEM 105 104 S.W. 66th M® wows 71 -I- 8 7 I- I-�..L18J,� 2111 •10 mmmmmm�= EXHIBIT S.W.'64th'STREET �i „ 40 53 , I4 6 41 54 3 16 9 114 '95 42 55 tIS 113 86. 43 56 Proposed Boundry for a Community &W.62ndTE.aRACE 112 Reinvestment Area (CRA), 44' 57 Z 2 98 ' U 45 City of South Miami 5 3 2 1 x 46 1 114 t 11 9 9 9 1 47 601 : ,; 3 109 g6 2 48 2 8 9 10 G 4 49 5-7 y &W. Ocd ST 3 ; ,6.. 110' ', 3 ,, , ,105 a 5 4 9 2 1 9 52 4 - 71 -I- 8 7 I- I-�..L18J,� 2111 •10 mmmmmm�= 12 13 S.W.'64th'STREET �i „ 40 53 , I4 6 41 54 3 16 9 114 '95 42 55 tIS 113 86. 43 56 w 112 97 44' 57 Z 111 98 ' U 45 58 ,u 46 _ 59 114 t 11 9 9 4 1 47 601 : ,; -n 109 00 48 61 3 108 101 49 5-7 y 107 102 a 50 63 111 ,, , ,105 103 52 65 105 104 S.W. 66th STREET aw. ann s t nttr N ® w PARK UA s. S.W. 68th STREET S.W. 68th STREET N a N S.W. 69th STREET 8 7 6 5 4 3 2111 •10 mmmmmm�= 12 13 15 16 17 16 19120 21122 I4 aw. ann s t nttr N ® w PARK UA s. S.W. 68th STREET S.W. 68th STREET N a N S.W. 69th STREET S.W. 70th STREET 6f(J t JJf 5 a 6 12 11 9 6 5 q 6 a 2 15 ? 1 mmmmmm�= 20 7 19 8 76 9 6 23 14 3 16 9 22 mmi°m�°mm S.W. 70th STREET 6f(J t JJf 5 a 6 12 11 9 6 5 q 6 a 2 15 ? 1 mmmmmm�= 20 7 19 S.W. 70th STREET 1 O u 7 7 M S.W. 71st STREET a 1 11 y 6 45 6 F N 15 12 a 9 5 0 14 13 3 10 f 2 1 1J t i 6f(J t JJf 5 a 6 12 11 9 6 5 q 6 a 2 15 ? 1 7 8 8 10 46 14 13 12 11 V < 20 7 19 8 76 9 1 O u 7 7 M S.W. 71st STREET a 1 11 y 6 45 6 F N 15 12 a 9 5 0 14 13 3 10 f 2 1 1J t i S.W. 72nd STREET 74 55• 54 35 - - . 34 73 56 53 36 33 72 57' 52 37 32 71 58 v 51 38 ¢ 31 TO 59, S 5 39- v 3 69 60 6, 49- 40 rs 29 a � 68 61' 48 41 28 e i 67; 62' ,47 42 vi ,27 66 63. 46 43 26 65 64 45 44' 25 24 W. 2 W 0 S S h 20 5 `26 IN w 19 i 6 25 12 18 7 0 1 1' `m 17 6 S.W. 72nd STREET 74 55• 54 35 - - . 34 73 56 53 36 33 72 57' 52 37 32 71 58 v 51 38 ¢ 31 TO 59, S 5 39- v 3 69 60 6, 49- 40 rs 29 a � 68 61' 48 41 28 e i 67; 62' ,47 42 vi ,27 66 63. 46 43 26 65 64 45 44' 25 24 W. 2 W 0 S S h 20 5 `26 11 w 19 i 6 25 12 18 7 24 13 `m 17 6 23 14 3 16 9 22 15 ( . 0 C C EXHIBIT B CRY of South Miami: Conditions Surve , MaV 1996 i � ' - . , I I DeterlSite . Unsn (Drain DiverlAge Viol Non -Con Str ' ! Buildg Iocki Bldg s'Major Deter Minor`Dila more iDet 20% 1 &1Cond1DeficijOwne47Struc Deft : Slr /B1 lStr /81!by I Main lCode Lot to Un Park' Requ Close jeldg .. Vaca Lots 11 6 1 - 21 81 2 1 x. ....,,x _ x. x x x 1 31 9i 2 41 1 Ix 1x Ix x Ix x, 1x% Ix,_ 1 1 41 4 21 11 1 Ix Ix -. x ... _x x x Ix x;' 51 11 5 41 1 x Ix x x x x x; 61 7 31 11 jx .. x. x Ix x x x' 1 2 71 12 1 81 1x Ix. x Ix x x x Ix 3 81 8 5 .2 1,. x x, IX Ix x x x 1 9! 141 2 :. 101 x x x Ix x Ix, I x Ix .2 101 4 x 111 ill Ix Ix Ix 1 121 241 16 71 71x Ix x Ix Ix x x Ix Ix, I 2 131 91 6H�2 9x x x Ix xx_ x x1,41 Ix 19 8 1 jx Ix Ix Ix x- x x _ ..... 6 151 161 1 111 Ix .x .. Ix _ (x Ix x x x. 5 161 71 1 21 1 x _.x Ix x x. x_ x I. _ 4 181 131 31 21 x x x. x .. x 19! 131 4 :3 Ix x x 1x x x. x _. 5 201 201 6 7- 4 x x . Ix. Ix Ix .... x -1:: _ _ 4 211 201 1 ..... 4 x _... x ix .. x Ix ... x 1 1 sl 221 9 31 Ix x. Ix -.- Ix x x x x x i 4 231 201 2 6 1 Ix x _.- x ix Ix x x I 2 241 201 51 lx--. - - x ix. Ix Ix x x 1 �_i 25! 201 61 Ix ... ! Ix x x x I c� City of South Miami:, Conditions,Surve , May -1996 ( .... 1 _ DeteriSite- IUnsn IDrainlDiver Age Viol Non -Con Str .', . . ! Buildg Deter, ,,.-: ':.]more iDet 81Cond IDefic IOwne Struc Main ILot' Park (Close Vaca Block Bldgs;Major Minor. De 20 %IDefi ISlr /BllStr /BIIby B1140+ Code Ito �UnJRequ I Bldg Lots'' 2fi� 20; 91 X x Ix x x._.... x._. . 1 27: 201 � 3 I Ix x 28 °Senio;Housing 29; 271 27 Ix x 30'. 11 4 :3 "2 x Ix Ix x x ..... X._ _. 1 311 16 31 11 x lx' 32. 321 32 Ix Ix Ix x 331 121 1 ;1 ._' 1 x Ix +x ix x _ 1 ,21 34!Shop (Center �, - 1- -1- 1 1 1. 1. 1 ! X. 351 1151 1 1151, : ' '. 11, ... 1. 1.,:- x' 361 171 81 3I x! _ Ix ..... IX I..: _ ... x ..: x I x I 1 7 ' 3 371 4 2 -; ... 1 x -... lx,... Ax lx:,.•... 38'• 11 i 111.:.. ,., Ix:.... 1x .. IX.;. Ix'_..... Ix:. _ I Ix. . _..1 ` .x 39' 91 1 91, Ix,,: !x ..... !x ., lx:, lx..: l ,,. x .. I Ix I' 401 91 ,....9 . ... Ix ._..Ix .. IX... _. x,.. Ix- x ( x: ! 41i 141 I 1 I . ,_ ... I , 1x ix 1., ( 1 _. _ 1 4 42' 131 1l_ I . Ix. _,.Ix. I.. _ ._ Ix I 1, 1 . 12 43' 121 2 3) ... x ... +x,.. .ix . I _.. x _ . x x 1. 441 5 ! __ L Ix x 1 _.. , 45' 161 21 ; : 1 Ix +X IX .. ! . _ ...Ix . Ix x I_ 1 : 2 46 91 1 ,. 31 x Ix !x ! X ._ _ x .... I .I ._ ..1 1 ..'; 2 471 51' r. I I x i.. x..1.. 48i 161 81 Ix Ix x x x I Ix �. 49 41 31 1 Ix Ix 'x I ! I !. 1 _ ....I .....1 ..... 2 + I I I I I I 1 ( I ! Total ! I I I I ( I I ( I I Block I 231 401 121 331 371 371 291 381 201 281 161 201 81 27 Aver.: I I I 1 ! ( I ! %of I I I I I Block I• i 124 %1 67 %1 76 %1 76 %t 59 %! 78%141%157%1 33%141%1 16 %1 55% Total: I ! I I Bld /P 710' 861 3351 321 1. 8 78 + ! ! 1 I 1 ! ! I I 1 Note: !Out of the 710 buildings/parcels 412 or 59% are in deteriorating condition. I • i I I + I ! I I I 1 I ,o C a It of South Miami: Condition's Survey,'May 1996 High lCrIme'Locations l Num.-joeterl, 11nadelGrand iAuto,!Auto' ' I ISex:- Condl&@Ieast,, ,31ock! Stree (Theft Robb I Burg - Theft. Burg. I Satte lHomi lOffenlin BIkl3 others JBlock 11 x 17- 21 1 21_ Ix 1, 1. .71 ..2 31x Ix , 1 1 11 1 3 41X Ix 1 .11 4. 51X x I x Ix -1 13 51 6x I—X I Ix -7 1 12 61 71x x I j 10 six qIX Ix lk 9 101 x 2j- 10 ill Ix IX jx Ix 1 Ix 91 111 12lx Ix I Ix Ix -1 1 191 .121 131x 1 I Ix 1 Ix I ''1 1 201 13 141x IX X I I .:.IX IX I 1 141 14 15Ix 1 x ix 121 _15 161X Ix I Ix" Ix 12 -16 171 x I Ix I I . - I 1 21 17 181 x IX 1 Ix Ix IX Ix 1 -121 18 19! I.x x Ix 'I Ix 19 .201 ix Ix 1 Ix I Ix 211 x Ix Ix lx .101 21 .221 I x 1 101, 22 231 I x lx 1 1... 1 91 1 23 241 I I I I I I I I 71 I 24 25! Ix Ix x 1 -71 251 City of South Miami: Conditions Survey,, a 1996 High !Crime Locations-_ -- • - -.•- . Num. Deter - 17+ IlnadelGrand I lAuto (Auto I ='' '- Sex:.• Cond B @Ieast . Block! StreeiTheftI Robb lBurg, iTheftIBurg 1BattelHomiiOffenlinBlk3 : others ..`.IBlock 261 x x: Ix x ...... 11 26 271 x x ;x x .:, •x x ..... I .....: 8 _. 27 281 x Ix ix Ix lx. , ix, _. ° I . -_ .'... 7. 28 291 x x x x lx Ix _ . ° . ._ _ _.. 71- 29 301x x x Ix x .... i.._;.._ x :_:... _.. _ i 15, 30 31 Ix x x x X .....' x...:.. x -... __.... ..._._14 31 321 Ix x Ix Ix- , jx , .., '!x ` 8 - 32 33; x x x _. _.. x..., I I x .. �.. ,1 ......._.., ..121 .: 1 33 341 IX x Ix IX ._ .Ix... ;x..,..i •., .i _. . :: 71 34 351 Ix x Ix ix:. Ix Ix _. I._:.; ..: .._.. `. . 71 35 361 x x Ix Ix- -..ix Ix ..•..:. _.... 131 1 36 37 lx Ix Ix I , .. Ix. .Ix._:. ` .. _ .11 I 37 381x Ix X. ! Ix :x ,..._... I __. f .....1. _ ... 111. I 38 391x Ix ; L ix I I .... .. 9 39 401x I Ix jx..._:.Ix i ....:., f . f _..__ 101 40 411 x ,x x,.._ Ix.. _, Ix.......I x.. ... _.. .9 1 41 421 Ix '; i.....I... ..:i .:.: I ..:_.. 61 1 42 431 x Ix 1 Ix . Ix:.... I I _.. I .. ' 1_. 91 1 43 441X x x ix Ix. .: Ix .. I ._. V .�81 1 44 45 Ix x Ix x ;x ;x I 121 1 45 461 Ix x ':.x I Ix- Ix 1 111 46 471 x Ix x- Ix I_.._ Ix . I_ 71 47 481x x x lx x . Ix Ix .: _ . _ _ 1 1. 131 1 48 49lx ix Ix ;x Ix - °x...... 'x.. - _1 Ix I 121 1 49 Total Block; 221 271 321 361 211 271 311 31 41 1 461 1 Aver. i I I i I I I i % of l Blocki 45-0/6, 73 %1.43 %1 55 %1 63 %1 1 %1 1%1 I 1 I 46 of the 49 blocks in the study area meet at least three other blight criteria. 0 LINIVERSIrY GAflDf*IVS )!O 2 qt rRA CT 7) rRAcr a A- Major wetenoration kounusul•) 9 X 2 B- Minor Deterioration (Buildit., &Land) dD J i j C - Vacant Land (Commercial) D - Vacant Land (Residential) :Sw 4z -e C) E - Non - Conforming Use (Incompatible Use' S J L F- Commercial Deteriorating (Building) 40 EEI J '24 7 T 55 S.W. 6 ff7 Z -- 4 5 7, J.5 'y rRA Cr ti 47 t y ., rib it J u 1 Amw 11 A.. TRACT I So 0 W) . Py A ly W, GARDENS IVC 4. IS u it SW 66 r,1R fARSHA4L rR.A L: I' D S. W. 67 Sr 2-9 - TRACT F e-f u.w✓rRs1ry TRACY C NO so, WILLMMS&N GweNs X. er PARK qw nr LINIVERSIrY GAflDf*IVS )!O 2 qt rRA CT 7) rRAcr a I C 9 MUM 2 I C J11111112= 1 .1 MON" 111111111011 17 45W 7/" 5r el 1 17 f. 0,- Ai 1-0 5.5W 71 .5,r A 0 MUM J11111112= 1 .1 MON" 111111111011 17 45W 7/" 5r el 1 17 f. 0,- Ai 1-0 5.5W 71 .5,r A 0 2 J11111112= 1 .1 MON" 111111111011 17 45W 7/" 5r el 1 17 f. 0,- Ai 1-0 5.5W 71 .5,r A 0 Ai 1-0 5.5W 71 .5,r A 0 Number of Parcel/ Building Address per Sections of the Map Sections 1 -17 Sections I- six parcels; 6 standard ' 2- eight parcels-'2 A's; 1 B; 1 D; 4 standard 3= six parcels; 1 A; 4 B's; 1 D 4- five parcels; 2 A's; 1 B; 1 D; 1 standard ' 5- five parcels; 3 A's; 2 B's ". 6- .thirteen parcels; 5 A's; 1 B; 3 D's; 4 standard 7 -. fifteen parcels; 1 A; 1.B; 1 D; 12 standard 8- five parcels; 5 standard 9- nine parcels; 1 B; *8 standard 10- four parcels; 4 standard 11- sixteen. parcels; l D; 15 standard 12- seventeen, parcels; 16 A's; 1 D 13- nineteen parcels; 14 A's; 2 D's; 3 standard 14- twenty -seven parcels; 19 A's;.1 D; 7 standard 15-'ten parcels; 5 D's; 5 standard 16- five parcels, 3 B's; 2 D's 17- six parcels; 6 D's `�•' Total First Seventeen Sections between SW 62nd Street North, SW 64th Street South and SW 62nd Avenue West, SW 58th Place East. A - 63 ' B - 14. C - 0 D - 25 E - 0 F 0. 102 sub - standard 74 standard Total 176 Out of 74 standard buildings/parcels, 19 have 50 feet frontage exceptions. Of the 176 buildings/parcels, 58% are blighted. C C Number of Parcel/Building:Address per Sections on the Map Sections 18 -34 Sections' 18 seven parcels; 1 -D; 6 standard 19- fourteen parcels; 3. A's; 3 D's; 8 standard (vacant'land surrounding site) 20- twenty parcels; 4 A's; 2 B's; 3 C's; .*11 standard 21 -'. twenty parcels; 1 A; '.3 D's; 16 standard (exceptions have 50 R.'frontage) , . 22- six parcels; 1 B; 5 standard (exceptions have, 50 ft. frontage) `. 23 twenty parcels; 2'.A's; 2 Bs; i.6 standard (exceptions have 60 ft. frontage), 24- twenty parcels; 4 B's ,16 standard (exceptions have 60 ft. '.fronfage) 25- 'twenty parcels;' 1' B; 49 standard* (exceptions have 60 ft. frontage) 26- twenty parcels; I A; 3 B's; 16 standard (exceptions have 60 ft. frontage) 27- not included; HUD Houshig'6404 -45 &'6904 -44 28- not included; HUD-Housing, Marshal Wms. Park, Senior Citizen Complex; University Gardens . 29- not included; HUD Housing, University Gardens #3 30- eleven parcels; 5 A's; 1 F; 5 standard 31- sixteen parcels; 2 A's; 14 standard (exceptions have 50 ft. frontage). , 32- not included; HUD Housing 33- twelve parcels; 1 C; 1 F; 10 standard (exceptions have 50 ft. frontage) 34- not included; Shopping Center Total 2nd Area (17 sections) Sections 18 -34 between SW 64th Street North, SW 68th Street South and SW 62nd Avenue West, SW 57th Avenue East A 18 B - 13 C - 4 D - 7 E 0 F - 2 44 sub - standard 142 standard Total 186 Out of the 142* standard buildings/parcels ;45 have 50 feet frontage exceptions. Of the 186 buildings /parcels, 24 % are blighted. Number of Parcel/Building Addresses per Sections of the Map (15 Sections) , ' O Sections 3549 , S�ctions- 35- not included; University Gardens.92;.I.ee Park Apt. 36= seventeen parcels; 4 C's; 1 E; 1 F; 11 standard. 37- four parcels; 1 -C;.1 E 1 F; 1 standard 38 eleven parcels; 5 E's; 5 standard (block, of auto repair shops; need more mix' use) 39- nine parcels; 5 E's; 4 standard (block of auto repair shops; need more mix use) ; 40- nine parcels; 5 E's; 4 standard (block of auto repair shops' need more mix use) 41 -. fourieen*parcels; 4 C's; 4'F's ;`6 standard (exceptions have 50 ft. frontage) 42- thirteen. parcels; 10 Cs-, 2 standard;' l - substandard w/ 25 A. frontage 43- thirteen parcels; 1 C; 1 E; I I standard 44 eleven parcels';'1`A; 1 C;: 11. standard, 45- nine parcels; 1 C; 1 F;'7 standard 46 ten parcels; l C`2 E's;.3 F's; 4 standard 47- five parcels; 5 standard 48- sixteen parcels; 16 standard 49= three parcels; 3 standard (Bakery Center; vacant) Total 3rd Section (3549) between SW 68th Street North, SW 72nd Street Souih and SW 62nd Avenue West, SW 57 Avenue East. A - 1 B - 0 C - ' 23 D - 0 E - . 21 F 11 0 ( 0 TOTAL number of Buildings/Parcels Identified by Section on the Map: A 82 :., B .- 27 ,C -''27. D - 32 E - 21 F. _ 13 202 sub - standard 305 standard Total 507 Out , of 507 buildings /parcels in the proposed CRA area, 40% or 202 exhibit blighting. conditions. This more'than meets,the requirements of Florida Statute 163 Part III, which requires a 20% blighting: condition in order to meet a finding of necessity: A;-B; & F - Building Deterioration =.122 Buildings �.o:, C & D - Vacant Land 59 Parcels E- Incompatible uses based ion surrounding property= 21 The 122, buildings/parcels equals 24% of the 507 units. The vacant land plus the buildings/parcels equals:180.or 36% of the, 507 units. Note 1. Eighty -two (82) of the 305. buildings /parcels standard classifications have a 50* feet or less frontage.. exception equaling 27% of the 305 "standard buildings/parcels.. and 16 % of the total 507 buildings /parcels. BUI LDINGANDVA .. CANT LOT, LIST REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING AND FIRE DEPARTMENTS 1: 6443 S.W. 60th Ave. - showing*major' deterioration, house.. on concrete.blocks,.no foundation, and has structural problems:'' Demolish. 2.. 6457 ' S . W .• 60th Ave. showing major deterioration, house ; is a _� •. wood frame on concrete block, and has no foundation: Demolish. ~' 3. 6487 S.W. 60th 'Ave. showing major deterioration :(no:; foundation, sitting on .concrete. block,• window frames deteriorated,.roof in deteriorated condition).: "Demolish. 4. 6501" S.W_ ;60th, Ave _,,;showing major -,deterioration, (foundation cracked /deteriorated.needing roof repair siding; deteriorated) Demolish..: •5. 6580 S.W. 60th Ave.- vacant lots w/ debris and overgrown trees, hazardous materials,-:commercial property :,:Substandard. 6. 6008 & 6016 S..W. 66th Street, shotgun house,w /.no" O expandable property opportunities: Demolish: 7. 5974 ' S "W: 166th' Street - showing major deterioration` (structural deficiencies, no ,foundation, sitting,.on concrete,, block): Substandard. 8. 6601-S.W. ; 66th,_..Street . vacant lot ,adjoining two.. lots on S.W. : 59th,Pl,. commercial property: Weeds overgrown and, hazardous debris. -'6600' S:FT. " 66th St..-'commer cial store `w /''vacant land: Substandard. 9.' 6501 S.W. 59th Ct.'- vacant lot•that takes up 1/2 of block,,,, overgrown weeds and•old fencing (deteriorated),-:., Substandard.. 10. 5845 S.W. 68th Street Coker Plumbing, dilapidated bldg. to be purchased'by the'city for use as extension of Murray. Park: Demolish. 11.•.7631 S.W.-68th Street - vacant land w/ overgrown weeds, to be purchased'by,the city to be used as extension of Murray Park: Substandard. 12. '5818 S . W . 6 8th Street — Executive Coach. Works ( Paint & Body. Shop), deteriorating fencing, debris and hazardous (� materials: Substandard. Page.. Two CD, Building, & Lot List 13. 5846 S.W. 68th Street - Transmission Company,,-presents a qu given the surrounding housing. and. land use estions• .. commercial uses :. Substandard: 14.' 5858. S .M. 68th :Street Street Vacant -.lot,', may be used by business, om the corner Substandard. 15. 5872, 5876, 5896, 5906 S'. W. 68th Street - Vacant lot for sale'by Caldwell Bankers:--Substandard.:.:.; 16. 5920 S.W. 68th Street - Dilapidated building w /!:boarded'up windows and-doors:--Substandard.., 17. 6049 S -N. 64th Terrace small shotgun. - tgun. house, , on ,,the. ground w/ septic tank in yard.: Demolish. ; 18.. 6065 S.W. 64th�Terrace: - ..Vacant lot', : 4,-000 S.F,., .:.too' small for current 6,000 S.F.. requirement ,.to* build. a. housing unit: Substandard. 19. 6081 S.W. 64th ,Terrace showing major, deterioration,. wooden structure on ground, shotgun: Demolish. 2T. '6091 S.W. '64th Terrace -.showing. major -deterioration,- very small structure::on concrete block: Substandard. 21., . Vacant lot on east side of S.W. 61st Ct ., f rom. S.W,. 64th Terrace to 66th-Street going.-south. i -Adjoins, property on .S.W. 60th,Avenue, 6488; 6500,. 6518,; and 6580 S.W. 60th..,. Avenue: Substandard.': 22. 5889 & 5895 S.W. 67th Street 'showing major-deterioration, iwooden fences deteriorated, w/ unsafe broken ,cars parked in 'adjacent lot: Demolish 23. 6009 S.W..-.66th,.Terrace showing major deterioration,. small wooden structure on.the ground:'Demolish. 24. 6025 S . W �.. 66th � Terrace - showing. .major ,deterioration, shotgun house.on the ground: Demolish. ..25. 6401 S -W'.` 64th','Street, and .6411. &°:6415- S.W., 59th ,.PL-.1 -Vacant lot, overgrown grass,, tires and other debris:. ,,-Substandard*. 26. ~ 6412 6420; 6428 'S.W. 59 PL Vacant :.lot r: Substandard-.: • NR District Page Three i Building & Lot-List 27. 6442 S W. -59th PL showing minor. deterioration, could. :be overcrowded: -Substandard - NR'.District' 28. `6429'S.W 59th PL showing-',major deterioration, - concrete block building, ,.four units needing- repair'; overcrowded: -.;._ Substandard _NR District. 29. 6450.& 6452 S.W. 59th'; PL showing minor deterioration; two units w/ potential overcrowded:'Substandard - .NR.District.- 30. 6501 S.W. 59th Ct. - showing major' deterioration; .house ,.w /. ' . structural problems and'attached land for potential 'development.: Substandard. 31. .6401 S.W. 59th Avenue at'64th Street - showing . Tin 'or deterioration; very small structure,'potential' 'overcrowded: Substandard'. " .32. 6421 S.W. 59th Avenue - showing major deterioration, very ..poor, 'condition — awnings, roof &'structure, potential demolition necessary :'Substandard. 33. S.W.; 59th Avenue 'from 64th Street to ,66th Street on the °,:west: side vacant lots, Iot- configuration constraints,>- .:_size and shape: Substandard. 34.. '6'540 'S'.-W., 66th'Street at.�58th PL •showing major deteri'oration,' fence •needs to ::be replaced, windows: &, awnings falling off ._house; structure in need - of .major.: repair., or,:, demolition: Substandard. 35.. /6520 ` S W. 58th PL- - 'showing major.,: deterioration, ' structural problems, roof & awning: Substandard. 36,'6501'S.W 58th PL showing minor deterioration:.° Substandard. 37. 6441•'S.W 58th PL showing minor 4eteriorations, Substandard: 38.-. 6431` S .W .' ' •58th' PL , - showing .minor; deterioration,,., windows doors':' Substandard: 39. 6541' 'S . W .'� `58th Avenue ° showing minor 'deterioration;, roof &; ' awnings: Substandard. .O w✓ Page four* Building & Lot list' 40. 6530 S.W. 57th 'PL - showing minor deterioration; roof & gutters:, Substandard. 41. 6411 'S.W. 57th PL showing ,minor deterioration, roof • & studs 'Substandard. 42. '6400 S.W. 57th Ct. Vacant lot.-w/ overgrown weeds., -dilapidated fence:-Substandard. 43..' 6410 S.W.. 57th Ct.• ''"showing minor' deterioration: Substandard.. 44. 64401 S.W.. 57th•Ct showing ,- .minor;..deteriorationc Substandard'. 45. 5982, 5986, 5990, 6004, 6010 S.W69th.Street Vacant lot, debris.piled up. Across from Multi- family housing,'',could be used-for housing,development or.commercial development to compliment -the needs, of residents-: Substandard Medium,' Intensity Office. ' �...✓ 46. 6100, 6110, 6120, 6128..S.W... 69th .Street fenced in parking ' lot, commercial use.now. Larkins Hospital owns this property, �potential.for better use of this corner lot: Substandard i 47. 6140, 6144, 6150,• 6168 S' V. 69th Street* fenced in business.•w /.lot,;question,,of. incompatible use:. Substandard. 48. 6011,-, 6005.,.• 5961, .,5965 & 6940 S.W. 70th ,Street Vacant .lot, fenced,' commercial .use. now, for sale: Substandard 49. 5831 -5821 S.W. .70th Street - Total Auto, Carle!' some work„ being done outside, incompatible user Substandard: 501: 580.1 S.W. 70th - Street - Rick' s•Garage,.some work being done outside,, incompatible,use: Substandard..' 51. 7000 S.W.-70th Street. Vacant�lot,.overgrown -weeds &.trees, lot 1. for sale:, Substandard. 52. 5996 S.W.•70th;Street for sale, professional office . building, declining property value question,:' Substandard. 53. 7001 S.W. Gist Ave. - showing minor deterioration, ;vacant' ' building,.need repair: Substandard. iI. Page Five Building - &. Lot .List 54. 5879 S.W. Commerce Lane -Auto Repair Shop'some work being done .outs ide,• incompatible use: Substandard. , : 55. 5800 S.W. Commerce Lane- Dave's Car'•Clinic; showing -minor deterioration: Substandard. 56.. 5795 S.W. Commerce Lane -' TSA• Motors, Inc,' cars• parked in lot and -work,being done.outside,• incompatible use: Substandard: 57. 5885• Commerce Lane .- Aaction.Transmission;•cars in lot, work being done outside,''ncompatible use': Substandard-. 58. . 5897 :S.W. 69th Street,- Several cars, in lot, work.outside, incompatible use: Substandard. 59.- 589,0; S.W. .69th. St.'. - 'Abandoned structure next to Post Office`'- Needs to be'demolished: Substandard. 60..,.6141 S.K. Gist Ct. at Sunset Dr. - Vacant lot w/ overgrown weeIds , ,.and fence deterioration: Substandard:-., 61. 1109 S.W. 61st'Ct showing-major 'deterioration old. housing structure, needs-to be' demolished,•.incompatible',use: next to_commertial, buildings: Substandard. 62. 7019 S.W. 61st' Ave. showing' minor' deterioration - -old villas .for .sale,. next to commercial /professional office 'buildings_, ' '.question'of -incompatible•use:-; Substandard 63. 7110,.S.W. 61st Ave. - vacant lot w/ overgrown weeds, commercial use'.property value: Substandard: 64.. 5995 •S;.W'. 71st. Street Medical Center. next to Vacant lot' at corner, can bedeveloped w/ other vacant properties on,70th Street, property value:-Substandard. -- 65. ` 5959 S.W., 71st•' Street • - 'Singles, Lounge, for sale, develop for•commercial use, property value: Substandard. 66. 6260." S . W. 58 PL - Two vacant lots:'. Substandard. 67."; ,59.00 S.W. 62nd Terrace - 'showing minor deterioration: Substandard. r� v Page Six Co, Building & Lot List 68. 5900 S.W. .62nd Street - showing major deterioration:,. Substandard,. .69. 5920 S.W. .62nd Street - showing major deterioration: Substandard. 70. 5930 S.W. 62nd Street = showing minor deterioration: Substandard.: 71 5954 S.• W. 62nd Street - Vacant lot:. Substandard.. 72 5900 S:W: 62nd Street. -- showing major deterioration; overgrown w/ weeds etc.: Substandard. 73".". 5931, 5909,'-5917-19, .5925 -27 'S.W. ` 64th Street.. .Vacant lots, one half ' block long, lead to 'site deterioration:.:,; , .•Substandard. 74. 5935 S.MW 59th PL at•S.W 64th Street ,Vacant..lot Substandard. 75. Entire blocks'. bordering the'backsi.de_.(south):.of S.W. 62nd Street between S.W..59 PL and S'.W. 62nd Ave.•to - Hardee Drive S:W. 64th'Street.• All lots will have a lot configuration constraint, less' than. the: required :6, 000 SF for'.a residential`lot:7Substandard. 76. 6253- 55,S.W. 60th Ave. - vacant lot w/ overgrown weeds: Substandard: 77. 6273 S.W. 60th'Ave.- showing major-deterioration: Demolish.. 78.•• 6301, 6317; 6319,- 6333', 6335; . -:6351, 6353,,.6365, 6367, .5985, 5981, 5991 S.W. 60th Ave. - showing major.deterioration and lot•constraints: Demolish. 79: 6300, 6316; 6332',• 6350, 6364,-6372, 6380,S..W..'59th.PL showing major deterioration and lot constraints :' Substandard.. 80. 6067 S.W. Terrace, showing maj or. deterioration an& lot constraints: Demolish. 81. 6051,.6031 S.W 62nd Terrace showing. ma] or deterioration and ,lot constraints: Substandard, Demolish. Page Seven (maj Building' & Lot List 82. 6017 S:W. 62nd Terrace - Vacant lot-w/ overgrown weeds Demolish. 83. 6082, 6066 S.W. 62nd Terrace - showing major,deterioration .-and lot constraints: Substandard. 84.• 6040, '6080, 6016 S.W. 62nd Terrace - showing major; deterioration and lot constraints: Substandard. 85. 6250. S.W.. 62nd Terrace - Vacant lot w/ overgrown weeds: Substandard -. 86. 6051, 6041, 6017'S.W.1 63rd Street - showing major -deterioration and, lot -: constraints: :,Substandard, .;Substandard, Demolish 87. 6290 S.W. 63rd Street - Vacant lot,- lot constraint and site deterioration: Substandard: -: •88.' 6090, 6082,: 6074, •6066, 6040, 6016, 6316 -6300 S.W. 63rd : :Street, =, showing major - deterioration and -lot. constraints: Demolish 89. 6085, 6053 =55, 6039,,.601725 S.W. 63rd Term. - showing.. major deterioration and lot constraints:. Substandard, Substandard, Demolish, Substandard, Substandard. 90. 6348, 6340, 6332, 6350 S.W. 60th Ave. - showing,.major:: deterioration and lot constraints: Demolish. • 91. `6083, 60591' 6051, 6039, 6017, 6001 S.W. 64th Street - .'showing, minor.;'deteriorat ion ; and lot constraints: Substandard: 92. 6179, 6165, 6143, 6133,'6117,6109 S.W. 62nd Terrace - showing.imajor.deterioration -and lot constraints:-Demolish, Substandard ;:(4): , 93.', 6170, 6116, 6100 S.W. 62nd Terrace - showing minor deterioration..and. lot constraints; :.Demolish.; 94. 6165, 6125 S..W: 63rd Street - showing minor deterioration .andlot_:constraintsi Substandard. 95: 6198, 6150 -6152; 6140, 6132, 6124, 6116, 6108, 6100 S.W. .63rd Street - showing major deterioration and lot constraints: Demolish. o N L— / \1 I I L.JI T a I AOTH ST.. Bpd Rd. SETH 8 '41001 C 64TH ST voce a. -2w ST. vnul 0r. 1 80TH ST. Oavn Ad Ul 'C i r- 1 1 y� — in. .. ( ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI DECEMBER 1, 1 995 0 Blighted Areas S01/TCN: Hobert K. Swrannout Incoroornted 1987 EAR Closeout Report 12 C CID EXHIBIT 11 so�r ETA�`� PRO FrL� A?etroAolit Research D 111 Division W r3' Pl 1 'Lii . slto a y l� o tiff 912g.1 ep enr 19 97� 3 Table of Contents . Preface .... ..... ..... ...................:........... iv Summary :. I. ............ .... ... .. .. I Map............... .. .. ... 3 Location ...................... ........ 4 History .:.. :..:............................. 4 Population .............. .. .. 4 Household Structure ..... ...........:.....:............. 9 Housing ...... .......... ...... .... .......... 12 Income ........::.. ................. . ......... ..?0 Employment ..... ... . .. ..............25 Educational Attainment ...... ........ . . .... .. 28 Highlights .... .... ... ...29 i � .. List of Tables Profile Summary, Selected Characteristics ......... ... 2 1. Population by Race and Hispanic Origin South Miami and Dade County, 1980 -1990 _ .... ... 5 2. Age Distribution, South Miami and Dade County,, 1980 -1990 :. 6 3. Place of Birth. and Citizenship Status South Miami and Dade County, 1990 ... 7 4. Place of Residence in, 1985,, Persons Five Years and Over,, South Miami and Dade County, 1990 ............... .. _ . 8 5. Living. Arrangement of Persons South Miami and Dade County; 1980 -1990 ..... ... ....... . 9 ,, 6. Households by Family Status-by Race and Hispanic Origin South Miami and Dade County, 1990 .................... 10 7. Living Arrangements of Children Under 18 and Adults 65, or More South Miami and Dade County, 1980 - 1990 ................. 11 8. Units in Structure, South Miami and Dade County, 1980 -1990 ................................... 12 9. Housing Units by Tenure and Vacancy Status South-Miami and Dade.County, 1980 -1990 .................. 13 10. Tenure by Race, South Miami and Dade County, 1980 -1990 ................... 14 11. Persons- per -Room by Tenure, South Miami and Dade County, 1990 ...................... 15 12. Value of Specified Owner - Occupied Housing, _South Miami and Dade County, 1990 ...... _ .......... .. 16 - 13. Contract Rent for Renter - Occupied Units, . South Miami and Dade County, 1990. ..... ........ . ... 17 14. Shelter Costs as a Percent of Income, South Miami and Dade County, 1990 ...................... 18 15. Percent of Occupied. Units. by Bedrooms and Tenure, South Miami and Dade County, 1990 .................... 19 16. Income Distribution, Households with Income, South Miami and Dade County, April 1989 .............:.... 20 17. Mean Family Income by Number of Workers; South Miami and Dade County, 1990 ...................... 21 18. Income by Source South Miami and Dade County, 1989 ....................... 22 0 0 (0 iii 19. Percent of Persons in Poverty South Miami and Dade County, 1980 and 1990 .............. 23 20. Percent of Households in Poverty! South Miami and Dade County, 1980 -1990 ............. ...'23 21. Labor Force Status, Persons 16 Years and Over South Miami and Dade County, 1980 -1990 .................. 25 22: Employed Persons by Occupation, South Miami and Dade County, April 1990 .................. 26 23. Employed Persons by Industry, South Miami and,Dade County, April 1990 .::.26 24. Workers by Place of Work, South Miami'and Dade County, 1990 :::. ..... ............ 27 25. Workers by Means of Transportation to Work, ' South. Miami and Dade County,: 1990 ... "27 .26. Educational, Attainment, Persons,Age.lSand Over and 25 and Over, South Miami and Dade County,'1990 ...:.. 28 27. Enrollment in School; Persons Age 3 and Over,.. . South Miami and:Dade County. .. ... . 28 iii Preface :. This is one of a series of profiles of commuaitydevelopment areas in "Dade County, Florida., These areas'are targeted for assistance by local governments using Community Development Block Gtanu.:They are scattered throughout the metropolitan area from Opa -locks in the,North , to Florida City in the South. Many areas are within the boundaries of the cities of Miami, Miami Beach4, Homestead; 'which administer their own programs. The others, in unincorporated 'Dade and in several smaller cities,"are served' by Metro -Dade, Office of Community Development. These profiles present data from the 1990•Census, Summary: Tape Files-, 1 and 3. -Summary•Tape File 1 includes basic: and housing characteristics from the census "short form" which went to all households. Summary Tape File 3 data are from the census "long form," sent to a sample of one in ten households in Dade. These data include economic and social measures such as income, poverty, employment, and education. Where possible, data from 1990 are compared to 1980 data to describe change in these communities. Summary characteristics are presented up front with an overall assessment of the area The body of the text and tables follow. The report concludes with a series of short paragraphs highlighting some of the conditions found in the area. Support for these profiles was provided by the Metro -Dade County, Office of Community Development as part of the Community - Development Block Grant Program. t iv 0 c a South.Miami The South Miami target area is a Black community in the City of South Miami. It is aJow- income and high - poverty area The poverty rate for` persons in 1990 was 38 percent, little changed from.the 37 percent ` recorded in 1980. The percent of families in poverty grew from 34 to 37 percent. Mean household income was below, the County's. About 85 percent of the population was native -born. Households in South Miami were more likely to rent than own their housing units.' Crowding was a significant problem, .especially in renter households: The value of housing, both. mean home!value and rent,`was below the County's. Only about 17 percent of the children in South Miami lived in married-'Couple households in 1990. More than two in five lived-with a single parent. About 70 percent of the households with children,were headed by a single parent. South Miauri residents had a lower level of educational t attainment than . the Counry.average. Workers in the area were concentrated 'in service and blue collar rather than professional occupations. In sum, the South Miami target area faces a range of serious social and economic challenges. Profit Summitry. Selected Characteristics South Miami and Dade County 1990 South Miami Dade Population Characteristics Total Persons 1 1,726 1 1,937,094 Percent Hispanic,Origin (may be,of any.race) 5 5.5% 4 49.2% Percent Black .. 9 92.1% 2 20.5% Percent White 5 5:5% 7 72.9% Median Age lntervai :. 2 20-24 3 30-34 . Percent less than 18 years : , .. 3 34.2% 2 24.2% Percent 65 years or more 1 11.6% 1 14.0% Percent Foreign Born 1 15.0% 4 45.1% H u 0 o s an ivrng gements Total Households Percent Family Households Percent Single - Person Households Percent Married - Couple Households Percent Female Householder Percent Children in Single- Parent Households Persons per Household ; Housing Total Housing Units ; Percent of Occupied Units Owner- Occupied Percent. Vacant Mean Value .Owner- Occupied, Mean Cont=act,Retit . Percent of Households paying'30% Plus of Income Percent Crowded Income and Poverty Mean Household Income Percent Receiving Public Assistance Percent of Family Households below poverty Percent Female - Householder Households with Children Below Poverty Employment Total Civilian Labor Force Percent Persons 16+ in Labor Force, - Percent'Unemployed 544 771,288 64.9% 69.5% 24.9% Z2.2% 49.5% 36.0 % ...: 14.9% 43.7% 25.9% 3.9 2.8 596. 31.3% 54.3% 8.7% 10.2% 555,638 SI12.484 S261 S441 53.1% ;:. 40.6% 20.2% 18.2% 517,926 'S37.903 30.0% ...: 10.0% 34.4% 14.2% 58.9% 42.4% 777 976.754 53.8% 64.5% '83% 7.7% Education Percent Persons 18+ Years Not High School C.raduam 49.1% 34.4% Percent Persons 25+ with BA or more 2.5% 18.8% Source:, U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population and Housing, 1990, Summary Tape Files IA and 3A, Florida. Metro Dade Planning Department, Research Division. 1992. 0 .( 0 517,926 'S37.903 30.0% ...: 10.0% 34.4% 14.2% 58.9% 42.4% 777 976.754 53.8% 64.5% '83% 7.7% Education Percent Persons 18+ Years Not High School C.raduam 49.1% 34.4% Percent Persons 25+ with BA or more 2.5% 18.8% Source:, U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population and Housing, 1990, Summary Tape Files IA and 3A, Florida. Metro Dade Planning Department, Research Division. 1992. 0 .( 0 777 976.754 53.8% 64.5% '83% 7.7% Education Percent Persons 18+ Years Not High School C.raduam 49.1% 34.4% Percent Persons 25+ with BA or more 2.5% 18.8% Source:, U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population and Housing, 1990, Summary Tape Files IA and 3A, Florida. Metro Dade Planning Department, Research Division. 1992. 0 .( 0 SW 62 ST I Sw 54 ST ul .4 0 ti It oil®�� ®�� 1, Ew 71 ST Sw 72 ST - Cl �C� TARGET FE Wk As II 993 Location The South Miami Target Area is located in the City of South Miami,in a roughly rectangular area bounded by SW 62 Street o'n'-the, north; SW 62 Avenue on the West; and SW 72 Street on the south. The eastern Boundary is SW 57 Avenue between SW 72 , and 64 Streets; then west to SW 59th Avenue and north to SW 62 Street. History Originally known as Larkins, the area has a long history as a tightly =knit Black settlement. The first Black settler, Marshall Williams, arrived in 1912 from'Madison, Florida_ He bought land in Larkins and encouraged other Black residents of Madison to do likewise. Through the 1920s the economy depended largely on the railroad, which was used to ship fruits and vegetables. ' .f t Population Total Population The 1990 population of 1,726 was a slight decrease from 1;872 recorded in. 19 8 0. „ Black and Hispanic Population The South Miami tar g et area was a Black community ( 92, P ercent ) in19 90. Hispanics anics w ere, 6,. percent of the population. lower than Dade 's 49 percent. i 0 5 Table 1 Population by Race and Hispanic Origin South h ia7ii nd DD de County Change 1980 80 to 90 1990 South Miami Total 1,872 (146) 1,726 Black 1,750 (161) 1,589 Hispanic 91, 4 95 White 111- (16) 95 NonHispaaic White 53 (14) 39 NonHisvauic Black 1.721 - (143) 1.578 Dade: Total 1,625,781 311,313 1,937,094 ~ Black 280,434 117,559 397,993 Hispanic ' 580,994 372,413 953.407 White 1,262,275 150,740. 1,413,015 NouHispanic:White 754,443 (168,836) 585,607 NonHismaic Black 269,670 99,951 369,621 Percent Percent Percent Change South Miami Total 1,872 -7.8% 1,726 Black 93:5% -9.2% 92.1% Hispanic 4.9% 4.4% '5.5% White ` 5.9% - 14.4% _. _.._.. _.. 5.5% NonHisp=c' White 2.8 %, - 26.4% 2.3% NonHisoanic Black 91.90/. -8.3% 91.4% Dade Total 1,625,781 19.20% 1,937,904 Black 17.2% 41.9% °20:5% Hispanic 35.7% 64.1% :49.2% White 77.6% 11.9% .72.9% _NonHispanic White' 46.4% - 22.4% 30.2% NonHisDamc Black 166% 37.1% ggource: U.S. Bureau of th Ce ;Ce of Population and Housing: - - Summary Tape File IA, F�on80, 1�y0. 5 0 AM Like many BIack communities, South. Miami has a relatively_ young population. In 1990, the median age interval was 25 to 29, compared to the County's 30 to 34. About 11 percent of the population was below 5 years of age compared to, 7- percent in the County.: About .l2 percent are over 65, compared to . 14 percent in the,County. Tpblg 2 r Age Dlstnbution South Miami and Dade County, 1980 -1990 Cnilth Miami t:. I Dide_ Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census Census of Population and Housing,Sumtnary Tape File IA. Florida. 1980 and 1990: 19BU 1"U 1 IYKU ' IYYU Total Persons 1,872 1,726 :. 1 1,623.781 1,937,094 Less than 5 161 184:... 1 94,237 139,714• '�5 to 9. 167 1.15V -. 1 101,385 131,426 1-10-14,., .''199 162 1 111,386 120,490 15 -19, 222. 169:. ! 136,285 131,060 20 -24 200 135 ' , 133,039' 139,196 25 -29 - .. 151... 128 125,898. 168,342 30-34` 88 117. 1 114,333 163.334 35-44. ... _ _ _. 182:` :.. 182 278,043 45-54 .. 165 163 1 187,309 212,098 55 -59 60 -64 68 53 - 61. 1 67 90,929. 80.555 . , 91.769 90,816 O 65 -74 149 93 ; 149,491 146,131 _ 75+ 67 107 105,698 '124,675 South Miami - Dade '' Total Persons 100.0% 100.0% 100.0 %1: 100.0% Less than 5 .... 8.6% _ .... 103W. __ , _..._. ! 5.8 %; 7.2% 5 t 9r. 8.9 %° _. _ 9.2% 6.2% ; . 6.8% 10-14: .. 10.6% .. . _ 9.4 %... 6.9 % 6.2% 15 -19 11.9% .9.8% 8.4% X6.8% ..20-24 10.7% 7.8% j 8.2% °' :7.2% 25 -29 8.1% 7.4% 7.8% 8.7% 3044 4.7% 6.8% ; 7.0% 8A% 35-44 9.7% 10.5% 11.9% , 14.4% 45-54- _ .._ _. _. ; :. 8.8% 9:4% _. _ 11.5% 55- 59:... '. ° 3.6/0 3:5% t ' ,}.i�:'4 4.7% 60 -64 2.8 %' 3:9% 1 5.0% . ,,..:,;4.7% -65-74 - 8_0% - 5:4% 1 --9.2% .7.5% 75+ 1_60/. 620/a 1 6.50/. 6.4% Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census Census of Population and Housing,Sumtnary Tape File IA. Florida. 1980 and 1990: .it's chip- Place of Birth`_ and Residential Mobility Compared to the County as a whole, South Miami residents were much more likely to be native -born, 85 percent. compared, to Dade's,55 percent., Nearly all (88 percent) were citizens, either native -bom or naturalized. The comparable County figure was 71 percent... 7 Pla a of Birth and Citizens}}��p Status South Miami and Dade C�unry 1990 South Miami Dade Number Percent —Number Percent ' Persons less than 18 _ Naiive'Bota,. ......632 _ 93.9% 382,664. Foreign Born ` . 41 6.1% 85.567 18.3% Naturalized Citizen 0, 0 8,292' 1.8% Not Citizen 41 6.1% 77,275 16.5 %, ,Total 673: 100.0% 468,231 100.0 °'0 Persons 18 and over :Native Both 1,092 80.6% 679,861 46.3% Foreign Born .:; 263 19.4% 789,002 53.7% Naturalized Citizen ' 65 4.8% 307,485 20.9% Not Citizen 198 14.6% 481,517 32.9% ..Total 1,355 100.0% 1,468,863 100.0% All Persons Native Born. �:' 1,724: 85.0 %.._.._ 1,062,525 54.9% Foreign Born 304 15.0% 874,569 45.10110' Naturalized Citizen 65 3.2% . 315,777 16.3% Not Citizen 239 11.8%.. 558.792 28.8% Total Population 2,028 100.0% 1.937.094 100.0% Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census. Census of Population and Housing. Summary Tape File 3A. Flonaa _. . 7 Residents were also: more'] ikely to have lived in:the'area 'for a4hile. Of all residents'5 years old and over in 1990;'72 percent lived in the same house as they had in'l 985. An 'additional 19 percent had lived elsewhere in Dade County. Comparable County figures, showed 45. percent. in the same hous6: and 36 .percent moving within the County. Less than l percent of residents had lived outside of the United States oprior to 1985, compared to 9 percent in Dade. 0 101 O ,o Table 4 Place of Residence in � 1995 Vears; Persons Five and Over 'South Miami and Dade County 1990 i South Miami ade Number Percent Number Percent Same House 71.6% 824,562 45.3% Dade County, Different House 350- 19.3%• 621,778 —,34.2% Florida, not Dade 33 1.8% 4.0,475':' -2.20/c U.S.,- Not Florida North East 6.1% 78,719 :4.3% Midwest 0 0 19,761 1. 1 %, South 0 0 40.775 2.2% West, 0 0 22,856 1.3% Puerto Rico 01 0 11,758 0.6% U.S Outlying 10' 0.6% 2,078 0.1% Foreign Country 11' 0.6% 155.599 8.6% Total Five Years and Over .1.813 100.0% 1.918.361 100.0% Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census; "Census of Population and Housing. Summary Tape File 3A, Florida. In S • 'The South Miami target area is ,a Black community with a stable p.opulation.:...'.1:..:. • It has a'h'igher . pr . oportion of nativ . e-bom, residents than the County overall. • It has a somehat younger population than the County. 0 101 O ,o 0 Household Structure Most South Miami residents,(about 86 percent) lived in family households, virtually the same as the County's 85 percent. About, 13 percent of the target'area residents lived in nonfamily households. A - family household is'two or' more persons living in a housing unit who are related by blood, marriage or adoption. Nonfamily households are singles or unrelated indviduals living together. There were ! 15 '' persons (less than.l percent) in group quarters. Table 5 Livwi Arrangements of Persons South Miam�s s4nd D 1980 -1996 de.County South Miami Dade __.... 1980 1990 1980 1990 Total Persons 1,872. 1,636 1,625,781 1,937,094 In Family Households 1,624 1,401 1, 379,027 _ .. ;1,642,545 Family Householder 407 353 422.762 481,263 Spouse 173. 121 330,472 342,515 Other Relative 1,008 881 599,990 ` ` 761,869 Nonrelatives 36. 46 25,803, _ 56,898 . -In Nonfamily Households 248,- 220 223.663 261.830 Nonfamily Householder; 204 i 191 187,068 211,092 "!1 With Nonrelatives 44 29 36,595' 50.738 In Group Quarters 0 15 23,091 32,719 Persons Living Alond 178 169 158.243 172:164 Percent Total Persons 100.0% 100.0% A00.0% 100.0% In Family Households 86.8% 85.6% 84.8% 84.8% Family Householder - 21.7% 21.6% 26.0 %. 24.8 %° Spouse ,... 9.2% 7.4% 20.3% 17.7% : Other Relative,: 53.8% ' .53.9% 36.9 % - 39.3% Nonrelatives 1.9% 2.8% 1:6% 2.9% In Nonfamilv Households.. 13.2% - 13.4% 13.8 % '13.5% Nonfamily Householder 10.9% 11.7% 11.5% 10.9% With Nonrelatives 2.4% 1.8% 2.3 % 2.6% 'In Group Quarters 0 0.9% 1.4 %' 1.7% Persons Living Alone 7.4 % .10.3% 9.7% .8.9% Persons Per Household 3.9 3.9 2.7 2.8 Note: Nonfamily householder includes people living alone and with other nonrelated persons. Persons living with aonreiattves may be in -a family or nonfamily household. ' ,Census of Population and Housing, Summary Tape Source: U.S. Bureau of the Ca sus File IA. Florida. 1990. 0 There were substantial differences between.the target area. and.the County a whole in terms of. household composition. pHouseholds in South Miami were much less likely o, be com rised of married Y P couples.,(22 percent.com aced to about 50 percent). The' ercent of households headed by a female tyl . ( P ) un s 15 percent.'. householder 36 percent ).was. more than twice the. Co „ . . . Among households with children, 71 percent were headed by a single parent, most of them women.',The percent of single- person households, 31 percent, was higher than Dade's 25 percent. 1 A Table 6 Ho Beholds bYY__Family5tatps by Cce and Hispanic ngtn South h ianji 1990 d Dade Hispanic—. . -•. _ Total Percent BI Black Percent Origin Percent South Miami Total Households 544 100.0% 468 100.0% 62 100.0% ;FamilyEousholds .353- 64.9% 335 71.6% 13. , 21.0% Married Couple, 121 22.2% 108 23.1% " " 10 16.1% With children, 71 13.1% 68 14.5% : 2 3.2% No children '.:. 50 9.2% 40 8.5% 8 12.9% "Male Householder ' 36 6.6% '' 34 7.3% .1 1.6% With children' ` 21 3.9% 19 4.1% 1 1.6% No children 15 2.8 %': 15 3.2 %, 0,1 - .0 Female householder 196 36.0% 193 41.2% 2 3.2% With children:` .: 156 28.7% 153 32.7% 1 .1.6% No children 40 7.4% 40 8.5% 1. 1.6% O Nonfamily Households 191 35.1% 133 28.4% 49 79:0% One person 169 31.1% 111 23.7% 49 79.0% With others ... 22. 4.0% 22 4.7% 0 ; ; ..: -,:o Dade ;'Total Households' '' . 692,355 100.0% , 120,321 100.0% 319,803 .100.0% t ' Family Housholds 481,260 69.5 %,:. 88,445 73.5% 247,536.. • 77.4% ' Married Couple.: 342,512 49.5% 42.043 • 34.9% 181,536 , 56.8% With children: I64,216 23.7% 27,139 22.6% 94;205 '29.5% No children; - 178,296 25.8% ... 14,904 12.4% 87531, 27.3% Male Householder 35,377 5.1 %' 9.380 7,8% 18.891 ;,5.9% With children 17,177 2.5% 5,877 4.9% 8,813 2.8% `"No children"- 18,200 2.6% 3,503 2.9 %.: 109078: 3.2% Female householder 103,371 14.9% 37,022 30.8% 47;109 :, 14.7% `:'With children, . 64,848 9.4% 29,108 24.2% 27,291. , 8.5% 1 No children 38.523 5.6% 7,914 6.6% 19.818 6.2% Nonfamily Households 211,092. 30.5% 31,876 26:5% 72.267 " 22.6% One person 172,164 24:9% 25,340 2I.I% 57.237 17.9% With others 38,928 5.6% 6,536 5.4% 15,030,,: 4.7% Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population and Housing, Summary Tape File 3A, Florida, .1990. The number of related children under. 18. who lived in single parent households increased between 1980 and 1990. However. the percentage decreased from 50 to 44 percent. The comparable Comfy figure in 1980 was 26 percent in'1990." The percent of children living with other relatives, grandmothers aunts or uncles, etc. increased from 21 to 38 percent. This compares to 13 percent in Dade. About 58 percent of South Miami's residents age 65 and over were family householders or spouses, .0. higher than the County's 50 percent. 1 A c In sum, • About 22 percent of households were married-couple families compared to 50 percent of all households in Dade. • Fewer than one in five children lived in married-couple households. About 44 percent lived in single-parent households. • A high 38 percent of children lived with relatives other than parents. Table 7 Living Arrangements of Children Under 18 anc[Adults 65 or More South Miami and Dade County 19801990 South Miami Dade - 1980 1990 1980 1990 Children Under IS TOW 683- 590 .: 389,997 468,0 10 Living with Two Parents 194 102 261605 .`274,680 One Parent 342 258 83:516 121.173 Mother. na 230 73,123 97,792 Father., na 28 10,393 23,381 Other Relatives 140 223 35.770 59.410 Other Nonrelatives .4 .7 5,606 10.098 Householder or Spouse - 3. 0-- 1,159 1,052 Group Quarters 0 0 2,341 1,597 Adults 65 and Over Total 216 201 255,286 270.806 Family Householder or Spouse .84 73 134.485 134.858 Nonfarnily. Householder 101 103 70,352 74,192 Living with Other Relatives 26 14 38,400 44.344 Non Relatives 5 11 6,145 8.543 Group Quarters or Institution 0 0 5,904 8,869, Percent Children Under 19 Total .100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Two Parents 28.4%. 67.1% 58.71/; One Parent 50.1%1. 43.7% 25.9% Mother' 39.0% 18.7% 20.9% Father 4.7% .2.7% 5.0% Other Relatives 20.5%, 37.8%' 9.2% 12.71; Other Nonrelatives 0.6% 1.2% 1.4% • 71.2% Householder or Spouse 0.4% 0 0.3% 5.2% Group Quarters 0 0 0.6% 0.3% Adults 65 or More Total 100.0% 100.0%� 100.0% 100.0% Family Householder or Spouse 38.9% 3 6.3 0/4"' .52.7%. 49.80/6 Nonfamily Householder 46.8%'- :51'.2%.' "21.6% 27.4% Li.WELg7 with Other Relatives 12.0% 7. 0 0/o 15.0% ' 16.4% Nonrelatives 2.3% 5.5% 2.4% 3.2% GrouR Quarters or Institution 0 0 2.3% 3.3% Note: A nonfarnily householder may be living alone or with other nourelated persons. Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census or Population and Housing, Summary Tape File IA. Florida, 1990. In sum, • About 22 percent of households were married-couple families compared to 50 percent of all households in Dade. • Fewer than one in five children lived in married-couple households. About 44 percent lived in single-parent households. • A high 38 percent of children lived with relatives other than parents. 0 Housing Number 1 itc of The 596 housing iiniu reported in 1990 was'a decrease from the. 665 - reported in 1980: The majority were single- famil y 'units, either artached or detached:' About-- l percent were in structures with 3 to 4: units and ne ly40 percent are in structures with 5 or more units. The comparable County figures were.4 percent and 40 percent, respectively Tallie 8 Units in Structure South Miam�t8 d Dade County -Miami South Dade 1980 1990 1980 . 1990; Total Units 665 596, 663,343 771,288 1 unit = 248 281 322,234 385,972 detached 196 162 282,381. 311,519 attached 52 119 39,853 74,453 2 Units 12 5 27,484 ,. 22,444 3 to 4 Units 111 67 26,963 28,943 : ; 5'plus units .287 ..... 236:. 272,848 ":. ° 304.655. Mobile Home, Trailer,' 7 7 - -13,914 :: 29,274 Other O Percent. ! Total Units 100.0%, „ 100.0% 100.0% 100.0 %. ' 1 unit 37.3% 47.1% 48.6% 50.0% detached 29.5% 27.2% 42.6% 40.4% attached = 7:8 °/a 20.00/6 6.0% 9.7% 2 Units, 1.80/" 0.8% 4.1 %-: ': 2:9% 3 to 4 -Units 16.7% 11.2% 4.1% : 3.8 %. 5 plus units 43.2% 39.6% 41.1 %. 39.5% Mobile,Home, Trailer,: 1.1% 1.2% 2.1% 3.8 % : Other . Note: Data for 1980 refer to year -round dwelling units only.' ' " Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census. Census of Population and Housing, Summary Tape File I Florida. 1990. I •% Tenure and Vacancy The vacancy rate in South' Miami in `1990 was somewhat less than the County's 10 percent. The renter - occupied share of occupied units (69 percent) remained stable but continued to be higher than the County's 46 percent. The percent of vacant units that were boarded up (35 percent) was much higher than than Dade's 5 percent. Table 9.. , .. . Housia Units� byy Tenur yd V cancy Status. . �out6 h ami an� ade �ounty 1980-1990 South Miami Dade 1980 1990 1980 1990' = Total Units 651 596' 664,905 771,288 Occupied Units : _ 611 54.4•, _.609,830. _692,355 Owner - Occupied 193 170.... 332,527 375,912. _ Renter- Occupied : 418 = ' ° 374, - . 277,303 316,443 Vacant Units 40 52 52,042 78,933: For Rent 12- ' 35 15,936 31,611 For Sale ' 2 2 8.590 11,007 Seasonal/other..: 26 15 27.516 36,315. Boarded Up n.a 18 2.607 _ 3:579 Vacancv Rate ;.. 6.1 °/, 8.7% 7.8% 10.2% Percent - Occupied Units 100.0% . , . , 100.0%, 100.0% 100.0%' Owner- Occupied 31.6% 31.3% .. 54,5 °io 54:3% Renter- Occupied 68.4% 68.8% 45.5 °io 45.7 % - Vacant Units .._. _ 100.x% � 100.0% '100.0%. .100.0 %. For Rent ...... 30.0% 67.3%. 30.6 0.10..... .40.0 %,.... For Sale 5.0% 3.8% '16.5% 13.9% Seasonaliother 65.0% 28.8% " 52.9°.0 46.0% of Vacant Boarded'Up 34.6% 5.0% 4.5% Not : •ln 1980 boarded- uo.status was shown only for year- round vacant units.. In 199 it included all vacaat.units. :. Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census Census of Population and Housing,Sutntnary Tape File IA, Florida, .1980 and 1990. 13 About 66 percent of Black households in South Miatni were renters. The few non -Black hoaseholds;had an even higher renter.share. Tenure South'M,am, I de County u,d Da 1980 -1990 • South Miami 1990 1990 Total Owner : -,' "Renter Total Owner Renter Total 611 ' " " 226 385 544 170 374 Black ... .... 524 196,- 328 466 ...._ .. 161 _ :..._. 307 White 83 16' 57 56 6 50 Other . ; 4 _ .. _ '4 0 20 .. 3 . 17 Hispanic 49 3 -46- 62 3.. 59 -' Dade Total 609,830; 332,536 277.294 692,355 _ 375.912" 316.443 Black: -84,551.,, 47,220 120,32I 52490 67.731 White 498,140 285,190 : 212,950 533.832 307,067 226,765 Other 27,139. 10,015': 17,124 38,202 16,255,... 21.947 192.466 89.056 103.410 319,803 154,017. 165.786 _Hispanic South Miami - `Percent Total Owner • Renter Total Owner Renter Total 100.0 %`: - - 37.0 %''._'..'..63.0% :_100.0 %,'. 31,.3 %.;`' r 68.8% Black. 100.0% _ ..37.4% 62.6% 100.0% ._ .._..34.4 %..... 65.6% White. 100.0% . 3I.3% " 68.7% 100.0 %° 10.7% - 89.3 9/6 Other ,. 100.0%.'" . L00.0% ''`' f 0 100.0% 15.0% 85.0% Hispanic 100.0% 6.1% '93.9% 100.0%,;;' .. 4.8%.':'. 95.20/6 Dade Total' 100.0%- 54.5 % <, • ;' 45.5% 100.0% 54.3% 45.7 °.•0 Black " - 100.0% . 44.2% .., 55.8% 100.0% 43.7% 56.3% White 100.0% 57.3% 42.7% 100.0% 57.5% 42.$ % Other' 100.0% 36.9% 63.1% 100.0%. .42.6% 57.4% Hispanic 100.0% .. 46.3 % " 53.7% 100.0% 48.2%,- 51.8 Note: a values for 1990 target area data are subject to supression. these dta, may not equal those to Table 9.. Thus totals'based on ource: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population and Housing, Summary Tape File A, 1980 and 1990. 0.11 Overcrowding Overcrowding was xproblem in the South,Miami target. area. About 20 percent of the, occupied units in the target area' contained more than one person- per -room, the standard 'measure of overcrowding.' This was slightly higher than the' 18 percent in -the County as a whole. Renter - occupied units were somewhat more likely to be crowded,. with 21 percent having more than one person per room. This was lower than the County's 26 percent of rental units. Ti Persons per South Miami in by Tenure Dade County 15 Owner Renter Owner Renter Total Occupied Occupied Total Occupied Occupied South Miami Dade Occupied Units 544 168 374 692,355 ` -375,912 1 316,443 less than .5 181 68 113 318,767 ` 207,654 111,113 .51 to 1.00 253 72 181 247,718 123,926 123,792 1.01 to 1.5 57 - 22 - ' '35 55,533 26,189 29,344 1.51 to 2 .35 __ . " 6 29- 45,56I 13.933' 31.628 2.01 or more 18 0' 16 24.776 4.210 20,566 Percent less than .5 33.3% 40.5% 30.2 %" `46.01/; '`'30.0% 35.1% " .51 to 1.00 46.5% 42.9 %0. 48.4% 35.8 %' ''" 17:9 %u 39.10/1 1.01 to 1.5 10.5% 13.1% 9.4% 8.01 %" 3:8% 9.3% 1.51 to 2 6.4% 3.6% 7.8% ' 6.6% ' " 2.0% 10.0% 2.01 or more 3.3% 0 4.3% '3.6% 0:6% 6.5% Percent Crowded 20.2% 16.7% 21.4% 18.2% " 11.8% 25.8% Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census. Census of Population and Housing, Summary Tape File IA. Florida. 1990. 15 so At $55,638, the average home value in South Miami in 1990 was about half of the County's 5112,484. ' The. value.had, however,, appreciated considerably over the 1980 inflation - adjusted value of 533,080. 43 ercent of residences were;valued at $60,000 or,more, compared to 8 About e ue ..:. . p p Z ercent for the County. P Value of S tfied Ornter pec ccapied Housing ih Sou hLami D d Caanty anld a 1490 South Dade Miami Total Units _138, ; : 275,298 less than 530,000 18 4,095 _ ......._S30,000 to 544,999... 26 11,870 S45,000-S59,999,1 34 32,309 _ _.. $60,000- $74,999 " , _ . ._ . ..._ ..... 41 54,309-, .. . .......... $75,000 to-S99,999 . : ` 113 . 74;912. _ 5100,000 to $149,999 4 52,723 $150.000 to $199,999 2 18,764 5200.000 + ., 0 25,746 Percent Total Units 100.0% 100.0 °i° Iess than 530,000 _ 13:0% . _... 1.5% _ .. _•S309000 to 544.999 .18.8% _, . 4.3% r 545,000- $59,999 24.6% 11.7% $60,000- 574,999 29.7% 19.7% 575,000 to.S99,999 9.4 % 27.2% ,$100,000 to 5149,999 2.9% 19.2% 5150,000 to 5199,999 1.4 % 6.8% $200,000 +: 0. 9.4% .Mean ..: 555.638 ..: S112.484 - :Source: U. S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population -and Housing, Summary Tape File IA, Florida, 1990 1L IN 1 0 Rental cost were low and declined in the, last decade. The 1990 rent of 5230 was lower than the inflation- adjusted average 1980 rent of $296 and much lower than the County's 5441. About 65 percent of rental units rented for less than 5300. The com arable Coun p p County figure was 22 percent. Only, four unit (about 1 percent) rented for 5500 or more, compared to 32* percent of units in Dade. • Table. 13 `Contract nt for Renter -Occu ied Umti' uth Milammio d Dad South Miami Dade Total Unit 361 305,935 less than S 100 54 15,527 - 5100 to 5199 95 ' 16,181 5200 to 5249 46 14,021' S250 to S299 41 .. -.. '21,364 S300 to S349 _ .. 49 30,280 _.... __.... S350, to S399 34 39,390 5400 to 5499 . _ _ 21. 5450 to 5499 17 34,036 5500 to S599 4 48,431 5600 to S699. . 0 25,047 S700+ 0 25.554 Percent .less than S100 15.0% 5.1% S100 to 5199 26.3% 5.3% M1 5200 to S249 12.7% 4.6% $250 to S299 : ... 7.0% S300.to S349 _. .....11:4% .. .. ... _.. 13.6% : ' . _ _ _._...... 9.9% 5350 to S399 9.4% _.._ ._ 12.90/6 _ 5400 to 5499 5.8%.. 11.8% :. 5450 to S499 4.7% 5500 to 5599 1.1% 15.8 %� .. . 5600 to 5699 0 8.2% 5700+ .. 0 ` 8.4 %`. Mean 5260:70 5441.00. Source: U. S. Bureau of the C us' of PQ ulattoti '. Hoastng,Summary Tape C ? 1A,,9onda,l9 ?8. and a . 17 Despite low values and rents some households were burdened by excessive housing costs."This w"as especially"Itiiiefor'' lo.w-ifid'ome hous6olds. About 72 percent of renter households earning less than S10,000 paid 30 percent or more of their income in rent. -Among those earning between 510,000 and 520,000, 77 percent paid 30 percent or more of theirincome. Comparable figures for the County were 85 percent and 77 percent, respectively. About 80 percent of owner households earning less than $10,000 paid 30 percent or more of their income in mortgage, payments and related costs.,None of those earning between SI0,000 and S20,000 paid 30 percent or more. Comparable figures Countywide were12 and 60 percent, respectively. Table 14 Sh Iter Costs as a Percent of Income Mth Miami and Dade County 1"0 Source: U. S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population and Housing, Summary Tape File 3A, Florida, 1990. io 0 0 10 South Miami Dade Households Rent Mortgage I Rent' Mortgage with: Income <30% 30%+ <30%. 30%+ 1 <30% <10%- 30%+ Less than 510,000 73 185 7 28 i 12,472 71,248 3,697 16,246 S10,000 to 519,999 12 40 22 0 17,942 '59,465 13,737 20,429 $20,000 to 534,999. 26: 14.,. 35 = 13 _54,099., 22,194 36,489 25,062 535.000 to 549,999 15 0 23- 0 31,238:' 2,618 47,462 9,851 S50,000+ 24' 0 10 0 I 24,761, .504 99,527 6.534 Total 1% 239 97 41 141j512 156.019 200.911 78.122 Percent 1 Percent Lem than S10.000 28.3% 71.7% 20.0% 80.0% j 14.9%. 85.1% 18.5% 81.5% 510,000 to 519.999 76.9% 100.0% 0.0% 23.2% 76.8% 40.2% 59.8% S20,000 to 534,999 65 . .0%. 35.0% 72.9% 27.1% 70.9%' 29.1% 59.3% 40.7% 535,000 to 549.999 100.0%., 0.0% 100.0% ... 0.0% 92.5% 7.5% 32.8% 17.2% S50,090+ 100.0% 0.0% 106.0%, 0.0% 98.0% 2.0% 93.8% 6.2% Total 38.6%'-' 61.4% 70.3% 29.7% 47.6%- 52.4% 72.0% 28.0% Source: U. S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population and Housing, Summary Tape File 3A, Florida, 1990. io 0 0 10 In 1990, the average number of rooms -per -unit in South Miami was 3.9, 3.4 in renter units and 5.1 in owner. This was close to the County average of 4.2 for all units, 3.1 for renter and 5.2 for owner. One- bedroom units comprised about 20 percent of all occupied, units. '. A high I9 percent of all units and 25 percent of -renter units had no bedrooms. The comparable Countywide_ figures were 9 percent and 18 percent respectively. Percent of Occupied U ' Table 15 , Bedrooms and-Tenure, by . South Miami 1 d Dade County South Miami Dade Bedrooms Total Renter 'Owner Total Renter Owner None 113 105 8.. 64,642 57,563 7,079 One 116 101 15 '186,662 130,530 .56,132 Two to three 296 -.... 190.: • ;106 375,959 I22,526 253,433 Four or more 7T _. 30.. 41 • 65:092. .__..5,730.1 59,362 Total units 596 - - 426 170 692.355 3.16.349 376.006 Percent None .19.0% 24.6 % 4.7% 9.3% 18.2% L.9%, One 19.5% 23.7% 8.8% 27.0% 41.3%i'" 14.9 %" Two to three, 49:7% 44.6% 62.4% 543% 38.7%; 67.4% Four or more 11.9% 7.0% 24.1% 9.4% 1.8 %: 15.8 %. Total units 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% g umber Avers e. n _ _ _ ' . of Rooms 3.9 3:4 5:1 4.2 3.1 S.2 Source: U. S. Bureau of the Census. Census of Population and Housing, Summary Tape File' IA, Florida. 1990. In sum, • There was a slight decrease in-the number of housing units between 1980.,and 1990. The renter share of occupied units was high relative'to the" County's average. • The vacancy rate was. lower than the County average. _ - • Overcrowding was a problem, with 20 percent of all units having more than one person- per -room. • Housing values and rents were lower than average. In 1990 the mean home value was about half of the Dade average. 19 91 OR Income. .. , Incomes-in South Miami were lower than the County average. and the'difference persisted between -1980 °: and 1990. The mean income for South Miami households -in 1989 was S 17,926, only a little less than half the County mean of 537,903: In• 1980 the target area's, mean income was about 53 percent of the County's. About 52 percent of all households with income had incomes below S 10,000 compared to 19 percent in Dade as a whole. At the. other end of the incofne distribution, only 18 percent of South Miami households had incomes of 535,000 or more compared to 39 percent of Dade's households. - Tablel&...'- nboa Income Distribution' Households Income ' South Miami and Dade County April 1989. ,.. South Miami ! Dade = Total, - Black Hispanic Total Black Hispanic Less than 55.000 181 95 122 64,978- 17,655 ' 34,722. 55,000 to 59.999.. .._ .135 85 .1 68,234 ._ _14,604. _ . 33.302 S10,00ofto 514,999 42' 35 46 66,434 13,466 33.939 S 15.000, to $24,999.. ` 91 ~ 91 0 1 122.785 24,108 61,494 S25,000`to 534,999 47 47 0 ' p 104,118 18,162.::, ,48.765 $35,000 to 549,999 55 55 0 108,950 16,911 48,978 550,000 plus 55 48: 0 ! 157,738 26.561 `56 ;630 Total Households 606 456 244 " `" 692,237 - 12D,077 • `317;830 _ Percent 29.9 % 20.8/. 50.0% 9.4% 14.7 � 10.9 %Lessthaa.55.000 �J 55,000 to X9,499 s, 22.3% 31.1% ` i 9.9% 12.2% 10.5% $10,000 toS14,999 6.9% 7.7% 18.9% 9.6% 11.2% 110.7 % 515,000 to 524,999 15.0% 20.0% 0 j 17,7% 20.1% 19.3% 525,000 to S34,999 7.8% 10.3% 0 j 15.0% 15.1% 15.3% 535,000 to 549,999 9.1% 12.1% 0 j 15.7% 14.10/6 15.4% 550,000 plus 9.1% 10.5% 0 j 22.8°70 22.1% 17.8% Total Households' _ 100.0% 1.00.0% 100.0% _ _100:0% 100.00.1 100.0% S17,926 S20,765 $5,082 537,903 S25,870 • S32,31 I _Mean Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population and HousmB,,Summary Tape File 3A. Florida.. 1990. v 70 CD Dumber of Workers The number of workers in a' household substantially'affeets household earnings.;'; In 1989.43 percent of the area's households had more than one wage- earner compared to Dade's 57 percent. ' For those households with two workers,. mean household income was about 74 percent higher than that of a single wage - earner household. For households with three or more earners, mean income was more than twice , that of a single wage -earner household. A high 22 percent of all households had no workers compared ; to 13 percent for Dade. Table 17 Mean Family Income by Number of Workers -South .Miami1and Dade County .. South Miami Dade Number of Number of Percent of Mean ' Number of : - Percent of, Mean Workers Families Families Income Families Families Income None 214 22.3% $8,803 61,364 12.6% 518,965 One 329 34.3% $14,609 145,394 30.0% 534.289 Two . 301 31:4% 525,394 204,773 "42.2% 549,528 Three or more 115 12.0% $47,277 73,677 15:2 %'` S60,634 Total 959 100.0% 1 485.213 100.0% Source:' U.S. Bureau of the Census. Census of Population and Housing; Summary Tape File 3, Florida. 1990. Population and Housing; Summary Tape File 3A, Florida, 1990. 21 Source of lncom Most households with income in South Miami (64 percent) received income from wages and salary- The "`✓✓✓ The comparable County figure was 77, percent.. A much higher than average proportion of households (30 percent) received income from public assistance compared with the Coun ty average 'of,IO percent About 31 percent received some form of Social Security benefits compared to 25 percent of households in the County.. Only 2 percent received interest or, dividend income compared'witii the.Dade average "of' 31 perceni. i Table 18 Income by Source South Miami and Dade County .1989 Source South 11'liami- Dade -Wage and Salary......._. .. .. 387 535,832 . Nonfarm Self Employed.. „ 36 78,306 .. to .. Farm: Self Employed ? Y : , ', 7.:' 4,630 _.- ._.. ..... _•__ interest, Dividend or Rent . 14,. 2I3.454 Social Security - "189'.... _ 176,055 Public Assistance 180` 68,963 Retirement 7 _ . 71,938 Other .. 47 46.457 Income Not Reported. , ;Total Households _ 606 ' 692.237 Percent of Households with !. Income Reported South Miami Dade Wage and Salary 63.9% 77.4% NonFarm Self Employed 5.9% 11.3% Farm. Self Employed 1.2% 0.7% Interest, Dividend or rent 2.3% 30.8% Social Security 31.2% 25.4% Public Assistance 29.7% 10.0*70 Retirement 12.2% 10.4% Other 7.8% 6.7% Note:: The sum of the percents exceeds 100 due to multiple sources of income. Source: U.S, Bureau of the Census. Census of Population and Housing.. Summary Tape File 3 -A, Florida, 1990. i Povert 1990. South Miami continued to be a high- poverty area. The poverty rate for persons was 38 percent, considerably higher.than the. County's .IS. percent; but about the same as... the 3.7 percent recorded in., 1980. Children were especially affected by poverty. ' Almost half (46" percent) 'of the children under five years were poor in 1989. About 44 percent of all children under 18 were poor. This was considerably worse than the County's high poverty rates for children, 25 percent for both age groups. Table 19 - Percent of Persons in Poverty South Miami and Dade County • 1980 and 1990 South Miami ; Dade 1980 1990.. 1980_ 1990...... Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number - -Percent Poor. Poor Poor Poor Poor.. Poor Ponr. Poor Total Persons . 694 37.1% 768 38.1% 240.892 15.0% 341.261 17.9% , _ Black_ _ _ . _ _ 618. 40.0% ..... 520.. 30.8% ,..81.936 1-9.4W. .' - 30.2 %. Hispanic" 45 68.2% 168 78:1% ;97.306' 16.8% :183.207 19.5% a Elderly 83 41.5% 154 57.7% 54.089 16.4% 52.706 20.0% Young Under 5 99 57.2% 99 46.0% 20.685 22.4% 33.721 24.9 -x, Under 18 33 45.7% 294 44.3% 74.966 19.6% 111.739 214.31 �•�..✓ Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census. Census of Population and Housing. Summary Tape File 3A. Florida. 1980 and 1990: c 23 0 Reflecting personal poverty; household: poverty razes also remained. quite high.. About 37 percent of all, family households were below the poverty level, a slight increase over the 34 percent in 1980. Among' female householder households, with children, a high 58 percent were to poverty. Table 20 In stun 1. • South Miami was alow- income, high - poverty area: The mean income of S19,926, was tittle more than half of the County average. • About 30 percent of South Miami households received public assistance income, three times the County average. • Between 1980 and 1990 the percent of persons in poverty remained about the same, 38 percent. This was higher than Dade's 18 percent. • A high 58 percent of female- householder households with children were below . the poverty levei. much higher than the high 42 percent Countvwide. 24 0 Percent of Households in Poverty South Mimi and Dade County 1980 and 1990 South• Miami '. Dade 1980 1990 1980 1990 Number Percent Number Percent,, Number Percent Number , Poor. . Poor Poor Poor Poor .... Poor` ..... Poor.. Poor., . Family. Households; 144: 34.40/c ;..; 146 37.0 %'. - 50,633; 11.8 %. 68,679 - 14.2% — Female headed ° 7,121 38.0% 27,076 42A% 86: S 8.9 /o All 11 I 57.7 /0 1 families. with children &`no husband present Source: U.S. Bureau of,the Census. Census of Population and,Housing, Summary Tape File 3A, Flonda. 1980 and 1990. . In stun 1. • South Miami was alow- income, high - poverty area: The mean income of S19,926, was tittle more than half of the County average. • About 30 percent of South Miami households received public assistance income, three times the County average. • Between 1980 and 1990 the percent of persons in poverty remained about the same, 38 percent. This was higher than Dade's 18 percent. • A high 58 percent of female- householder households with children were below . the poverty levei. much higher than the high 42 percent Countvwide. 24 0 c� C Frnplloyment Labor Force Status In 1990: of the civilian labor force in South. Miami was unemployed, compared to 5 percent in,. 1980: Tie: : 1990 rate; was'the same as the County rate. The raze of labor force participation in the area was lower than the County average.: About 46 percent of area residents over 16 were not in the labor, force, i.e., neither employed nor looking for work, compared to Dade's 36 percent.. Table 21 Labor Force Status, Persons 16 Years and Over South 14i i and-Dade County, 1980 and 1990 South Miami . Dade _ Percent Percent Civilian'labor Force 1 .100.0% - = 100.0% 100.0% 100.0 %1 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Employed 96:0% 91.9% 91.1% 100.0% 95.0% :.92.3% 87.4% 92.0 %. Unemployed 1 4.7% 8.11/6 8.9% 0 5.0% 7.7% 12.6% 1.0% Not in tabor Force 1 43.7% 46.2% 40.7% 82.6% 39.2% 35.5% 33.8% 4.9% Note: All figures refer to the civilian labor force. Members of the armed forces are excluded. e Census, Census of Population and Housing, Summary Tape rile 3A.FIorida; gg�trce. U.S. Bureau of�� th 1190. '1980 1 1990 I 1980 1990 Hispanic 1. . I Hispanic Total Total Black Orrin I Total Total Black Origin Civilian Labor Force 720 777 708.. 321 78I,3081, 976,754 191,256 502336 Employed 691 714 645 32 742,6321 90I,828 158,428. 462,130 Unemployed 34 '63 63 0 38,676 74,926 '' 22,828 .40,206 Not in Labor Force 559 666 485 152 504,15'81 537,778 .92692 '26,074 Percent Percent Civilian'labor Force 1 .100.0% - = 100.0% 100.0% 100.0 %1 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Employed 96:0% 91.9% 91.1% 100.0% 95.0% :.92.3% 87.4% 92.0 %. Unemployed 1 4.7% 8.11/6 8.9% 0 5.0% 7.7% 12.6% 1.0% Not in tabor Force 1 43.7% 46.2% 40.7% 82.6% 39.2% 35.5% 33.8% 4.9% Note: All figures refer to the civilian labor force. Members of the armed forces are excluded. e Census, Census of Population and Housing, Summary Tape rile 3A.FIorida; gg�trce. U.S. Bureau of�� th 1190. Occupation The employed labor force in'South Miami was less likely to be in managerial.or professional specialty occupations (14' percent compared to 25 percent Countywide.) They were much more likely to be in . service occupations, about 42 percent compared t'0'15 percent of Dade's workers. South Miami Dade Managerial and professional specialty .100 14.0% 221,273. 24.5% Technical 13 _..1.8 %_ 29,702: _..13% Sales , 82 11.5% 122,139. 13.5% ... 8 Administrative Su n,, .27 - , 3:%0 �. ' `. PPo _ ,. 161,460. _. 17.9% _ ' Service . 299 41.9% 134 450. ' , . • 14.9% , :Farming,-forestry and fishing 16 2.2% 14,894. Precision; production. cram and repair 41 5.7% 96,072. 10.7% Operators, fabricators and laborers . 136 19.0% 121,838... _13.5%'.. "Total - 714. 100.0% -. .._ 901.828. 100.0% _ . - Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census.'Censiu of Population and Housing, Summary Tape File 3A, Florida, 1990. Iudu-stiy The distribution of workers by industry in the South Miami target area was also different from the Counrv's. A high 23 percent were in retail sales, compared to 1$ percent in the County. About 37 percent were in professional and related services, compared to 22. percent Countywide.: Table 23 Em loved Persons by Industry Souh 1�iiami and by County 1990 Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population and Housing, summary Tape File 3A, Florida, 1990. 0 ( O l� South Miami Dade Agriculture, forestry, fisheries and mining 16 2.3% 16,926 1.9% Construction 32.. 4.b% 57,017 6.3% Manufacturing 31 4.4% 102,372 11.4% T nation, communications, and other 51 7.3% 88,723 9.8% pu !b tic utihues Wholesale trade 7 1.0% 57,029 6.3% Retail trade 164 23.4% 157,772 17.5% Finance, insurance, and real estate 0 0 74,499 8.3% Business and repair service 17 2.4% ' 53,884 6.0% Personal. entertainment and recreation services 76 10.8% 60,317 6.7% Professional, Health Services 151 21.5% 77,816 8.6% Professional, Education Services 70 10.0% 63.163 7.0% Other Professional and related services 36 5.1% 56,121 6.2% Public administration 51 7.3% 36.189 4.0% Total 702 100.0% 901,828 100.0% Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population and Housing, summary Tape File 3A, Florida, 1990. 0 ( O l� Place of Work Like the County overall , South Miami had a work -force employed locally. All worked in Dade County, compared to 95 percent of all County workers. SoWorkers t ii and Dade Cam' Table 24, y 1990 South Miami Dade Dade County 684 100.0% 844,722 95.1% OutsiOutside Dade 0 0 43,274 4.9% de Total Workers 684 100.0% 887,996 Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census; Census of Population and' Housing, Summary Tape File 3A,:Flonda. 1990. Commuting Workers had a mean commute time of 23 minutes (slightly less than the Counry's' average of 25 minutes). Reflecting the area's proximity to Metrorail, they were more likely to.use public, transportation or to walk to work than Dade's workers. as a whole. About 17 percent used public transporEation and 'about 12 percent walked. The comparable.County. figures are 6 and 3 percent. Table 25 Workers by Means of Transportation to Work South Miami and Dade County - I990 .. South Miami Dade Car, truck or Van 402 58.8% 780.997:,; 89.8% Drive alone 302 44.2% 642,669 73.9% Car Pcol 100 14.6% 138,328 15.9% Public 116 17.0%.. 52,162 6.0% .-Transportation Walk Alone. 80 11.7% 22,454 ` , ; `2.6% Other Means 73 10.7% .. 8,621 1.0 °% Work at Home 13. 1:9% •7_18,091 • .-2,1 %. Total 684 100.0% 869,905 100.0 11/6 Mean Commute: 23 minutes ; 25 minute Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population and Housing, Summary Tape File 3A, Florida, 1990:. In sum, South Miami's residents • were more likely than Dades' to be in service occupations and in retail ' trade. • At 8 .percent, the unemployment rate was about the same as the County rate. A high 46 percent of residents age 16 or over were not in the labor force. 27 Educational Attainment The educational attainment levels of South Miami residents over 18 lagged well behind the County levels. A high 49 percent had not completed high school compared to the County average (34 percent), only 2 percent had completed four or . more years of college compared to 17 percent in Dade. Table 26 Edue tional Attainm nt _ ........ and Over and 25 and Over Persons A e 1 - South Miami South Miami and Dade County Dade. 1990 Preschool ... South Miami Dade ., ;4.9% , . 18 and Over Elementary to Elementary & High -' 1 -3 Years High School 665 49.1% 504,965 34.4% . 4 Years High School 469 34.6% 349,454 23.8% 1 -3 Years College 192 ' 14.2%, .360,748. 24.6% 4 Years ofCollege - •` 29 ; •. 23% 253,696 17.3% Total - 1.355. 100.0% 1.468.863 100.0% 86 25 and Over Elementary to 8.4 %, 1 -3 Years High School 617 52.5% 448,282 35.0 %° 4 Years High School 375 31.9% 296,444 23.1% 1 -3 Years College 154 . " 13.1% „ 296,109 23.1% 4 Years of College - 29 -2.5 % `-240;460 18.8% Total .. �. .._ - .1, 175 100.0% - 1.281.295 100.0% e .... ;Bureau'of the Census, Census Population and Housing, Summary Tape'' Source: U.S. of Po P g File 3A: Florida. 1990. ... -.. ,• As might be expected given the age structure of the community, a higher proportion of residents of South Miami (22 percent) were enrolled in elementary and high school than were Dade residents ( 18 percent). A smaller proportion or residents were enrolled in college, percent compared to 8 percent. Table 27 Enrollment in School _ •. Persons Age 3 and Over.. South Miami and Dade County 1990 Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population and Housing, Summary Tape File 3A. Florida, 1990. 0 In sum. O • Educational attainment in South Miami Iagged behind the County average. 2R South Miami Dade. Preschool ... ::. 93 .... ., ;4.9% , . . • 33.921....: 1.8% Elementary & High 413 21.9% 325,869 17.6%. School College 86 4.6 %:. :..., , 155;821 8.4 %, Not Enrolled � ' 1.294 -68.6% - .• :::; ] .339:472.... _ , 72.2 %,_ Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population and Housing, Summary Tape File 3A. Florida, 1990. 0 In sum. O • Educational attainment in South Miami Iagged behind the County average. 2R C — HIGHLIGHTS POPULATION - The South Miami target area is a Black (92 percent) community. The 1990 population of 1,726 was a slight decrease from the 1,872 in 1980. Hispanics were 6 percent of the population, considerably lower than. the County average (49 percent). The median age interval in 1990 was 25 to 29 years, younger than the County's'30 to 34. About 12 percent of residents were over 65 years of age. About 85 percent of residents were native-born, *compared to the County's 55 percent. HOUSEHOLD'STATUS AND LIMG ARRANGEMENTS About 22 percent of households were married - couple families compared to 50 percent Countywide. About 63 percent of all households with children had a female householder with no husband present. Only ITpercent of all children under 18 years lived in marred- couple households. about 44 percent lived in single - parent households. HOUSING There was 'a slight decrease in the number of housing units between 1980 and 1990. The renter share of occupied units (69 percent) was higher than the County average t46 percent) but about the same as in 1980. Overcrowding was a problem. Nearly 20 percent of all units had more than one person- per -room compared to 18 percent in the County.. Housing values and rents.were lower•than average. ,The mean home value of 555.638- was only about - half of Dade's S 112,484: About 53 percent of households paid 30 percent or more of their incomes for monthly housing costs. INCOME The mean income of 517,926 was about half of Dade's mean of S37,903. About 30 percent of households.with earnings received public assistance, compared to the County's 10 percent. 29 s r C10' POVERTY Between 1980 and 1990 the percent of persons in poverty remained about the same, 38 percent. This was much higher than Dade's 18 percent. In terms of family households, 37 percent were below the poverty level, compared to Dade's 14 percent. Nearly 60 percent of female - householder families.with children were below the poverty level. EMPLOYMENT The unemployment rate of 8 percent was higher than the 5 percent repotted in 1980, but about the same as the County. The raze of labor force participation was lower than average, with 46 percent of residents not in the labor force. Employed residents were less likely than average to be in managerial occupations and more likely to be in service occupations: EDUCATION A high 49 percent of South Miami residents aged 18 and over failed to complete high school. Countywide this figure was 34 percent. Exist?, Land Use in South Miami Ac-es Pe:Q -mot Single- Family Residential 796.90 51.33 at 3.9 DUlAcre Two-Family Residential 8.81 0.57 at 8 DUlAcre Multifamily Residential 5204 3.36 at 10.20 DUTAcra. CIustar Single- Fansily/Townnousei ViIIa Residential at 6 DU /Acre 1284 0.83 Commtraal: naichbornood.: retail. 121M , .7.82: ; tutomouve and downtown retail ... . Ofrice, 4294 7-77 ,. Public 53.77 3.46 Recreation 38.89 251 Vacant 39.51 2.55 StreetsrWater 38527 ' 24.82 TOTAL 1=40 100.00 . •.✓ Source: Feld survey by:Robert K Swarthcut. Incorporated.' 1237. s^ CONDITION OF THE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ELEMENT AT THE TIME OF ADOPTION he traffic conditions in South Miami are characterized by a significant amount of through traffic n the Countywide road network. The City also has an extensive single - family residential street etwork (Attachment 2.1). EXISTING CIRCULATION SYSTEM letwork Inventory he South Miami road network consists of one arterial and two collectors serving north/south tovement, and three arterials and two collectors serving east /west movement (Attachment 2.2) here are also two expressways . located just'outside of the City limits.' Both lexpressway&dump large amount of traffic onto City streets. • •The following are existing `.conditions on streets rithin the City limits: Kendall. Drive: This road is a major Countywide east /west traffic facility serving the southern parts of the City. This road is, two lanes with a expansion to six lanes outside the City. Kendall Drive also serves as a portion of the City's southern boundary. S.W. 80th Street: This -east /west residential collector forms the remainder of the City's southern boundary. S.W. 80th Street is a two lane road with access to the Snapper Creek Expressway just outside of the City limits. Sunset Drive: This east/west minor arterial provides access through the heart of the City including the downtown area and the Bakery Centre. It is a four lane divided road through the City and is designated as an historic highway both east and west of the City. S.W. 64 Street: This east/west residential. collector is limited to local trips. The road is two lanes throughout the City. - - Miller Road: This east /west collector is two Imes through. the City expanding to four lanes at Ludlam Road. The roadway provides access to the University of Miami to the east and the Palmetto Expressway to the west. S. W. 48 Street: This east/west residential collector is limited to local trips. The road is two lanes throughout the City. Bird Road: This six-lane divided roadway forms the northern boundary of the City. The road is an important county facility carrying a high percentage of through traffic. The roadwav also has an interchan ge with the Palmetto Expressway just outside of the City limits. 20 ?AR Closeout Report �, 0 ,o Ludlam Road: This'. north/south two lane collector forms a' portion of the City's western through trips as well as a number of county'�collector, and' provides 'for, a number of boundary. . The roadway, serves" a of local trips. S.W. 62ndAvenue.",This north/south collector serves mostly local traffic. The roadway' ad scent land uses being residential. The roadway 'ex ands to four lanes, is two lanes with' J g � p around the US I area with the adjacent Iand uses being predominantly commercial. Red Road. This north/south arterial facility serves as the eastern border to the City. The roadway is two lanes except in the area south of US i to 74.. street. U.S.]: This is a principal county arterial, with a high amount of through traffic. The roadway is six lanes: divided.throughout. the City. Local Street Network South Miami has a number of Llocat streets that form a`grid throughout the'cotnmunity. These strews are primarily, far�the use of local residents but are frequently, used by through traffic. Functional Classification The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) is responsible for the! functional classification of roadways (Attachment 2.3). The following classifications are utilized to' typify roadways: PRINCIPAL ARTERIALS - are defined as major highways serving regional activity centers. m South Miami they are: U.S.1 - Bird Road - Kendall Drive MINOR ARTERIALS - �a:re'defined-as'carrying moderately heavy,traifc and designed to channel traffic to'communitv''activity, centers.- ln'South Miami they are: - "Sunset `Drive, . _ - Red: Road -COLLECTOR STREETS - are defined as carrying moderately low traffic volumes and are designed to channel traffic to the local street network. In South Miami they are: Miller Road - Ludlam Road - S.W. 62nd Avenue - S.W. 48th Street Existing Traffic Conditions. According, to Metro -Dade Public Works Department and Florida. Department of Transportation .' S:1 is carrying the heaviest amount of traffic through the City (Attachment 2.4 & 2.5). U.S.1 ,yl an average of 681670 'vehicles per, day north of Kendall Drive and 31,993 nordi of Sunset -.eve. Bird Road with 45.693 vehicles per day has the next highest average .daily traffic volume EAR Closeout Report 21 in the City. The heavyy traffic volumes on =these: streets, are primarily. due: to commuter trips outhwest of the City. between downtown Miami, and suburban, locations:ao ahe west: and, s Existing Level of Service Except for Bird Road . (LOS � "C" ), all South Miami roadways :where; counts; are available: are at LOS D or worse.,;-Both ,Ludlam Road and Sunset Drive ,are operating at LOS "D ':. Existing : ,' levels of service ,are detailed in: Attachment, 2 4. , MASS TRANSPORTATION,-_ All mass transportation in South Miami is provided by Metro-Dade, County and private carriers.' The major provider of transit is the Metro -Dade Transit Agency (Attachment 2.6). The County's mass transit operation is a multi -modal system consisting primarily of a passenger bus operation., connecting to the. Metrorail.and, Metromover rail systems. The County, system is a fixed - route, fixed- schedule bus system: operated by the Metro-Dade �:Transit:Agency with, the main. hub.: ;.. operating from Downtown Miami. Rail transit consists of the Metrorail and Metromover systems with the main station, and only rail to rail transfer point, being the Government Center. Station..: in Downtown Miami..,, The ;.Metrorail system is: a,.2 :E mile -rapid transit system: and:Metromover is a 1.9 mile elevated downtown, peopie mover. EXISTING ROADWAY DEFICIENCIES The Analysis Results Important South Miami arterials and collectors are deficient, based on South Florida Regional Planning Council LOS standards. The South Florida Regional, Plannmg-,Councih,has established LOS "D" as the appropriate LOS standard except in special cases .where LOS ; "E" is acceptable. Tile analysis indicates that Miller Road, Kendall Drive, Red Road (between Kendall Drive and U.S.I.) and U.S.1 are currently deficient based on LOS "D ". The LOS "D" is „not accepted as City of South Miami policy. Existing Needs - The analyses or existing needs are shown in attachments 2.7 and 2.8. One is daily, and one is peak hour. Programmed Improvements Transportation improvements programmed for the City of South Miami by Dade County are as follows: EAR Closeout Report 22 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS and 2000 Projections, 7or South Miami-traffic ro j e ctons are illustrated' in attachments 2.9 and-2-10, This, data was, ., .. obtained from Metro -Dade County Transit Planning Agency. ' RECOMMENDED CIRCULATION SYSTEM Level of Service Standards Preferred by the City Lf'the City of South Miami adopts the Level of Service standard "D" as recommended by the South Florida Regional Planriing Council some streets would require major widening. It is the legislative judgement of the South Miami City Commission that such � widening ' would not necessarily result in improved levels of service. ' Instead, efforts should encourage commuter ' traffic to use high design arterials that do -not pass through the "City. Fiiuthetmore LOS "D is undesirable because it cannot be attained. Non- attainment could force the City to freeze development permits. The following service levels are set for both 24 -hour and peak hour periods: 1. 'Principal Arterial.. LOS 7" 2. Minor; Arterial LOS "Ffr- 3. Collectors LOS "C., °vel of Service Standards Accepted by, the City to Achieve-a Finding of Compliance from Department of Community Affairs'. [DCA]' t,.e above level -of- service notwithstanding, development 'in- the City "shall be governed by additional terms and conditions agreed to by the City of South Miami Florida 'and DCA. These terms and conditions are agreed to by the City and incorporated as pan of this plan in order to facilitate a finding by the DCA that this Comprehensive PIan is in compliance with Florida Law and the Florida Administrative Code.' The additional terns and conditions'agreed to by the City are as followed: 1. Until December 31, 1995, the peak hour level -of- service standard for U.S.1 shall ble . . H5 percent of the peak hour traffic count in 1989. The City shall use the peak ,hour' traffic data for 1989 available from the' Florida Department of Transportation. 2. After December 3I 1995; the peak hour level -of- service standard shall be 150 percent of D capacity for US 1. 3. The peak hour level -of- service standard for Bird Road shall be 120 ' percent' of E capacity. :. 4. The City will not issue' any new - construction, permit which would have, the effect' of " lowering the level -of- service on Bird Road or US l below the levels specified ME" 1 ", "2 and "T' above unless such permits are issued pursuant to a development of regional impact (DRI) approval granted prior to the effective date of this plan., EAR Closeout Report 23 , The City of South Miami views these standards as more restrictive than desirable or appropriate for the City, but accepts them as the most permissive standards that are likely to win.approva! iTOm the .Florida Department or .Commtiot�s.Affalrs. The Clty, .believes .more .permissive Community, , Standards are in order for the' foilowin r g a. 'There is only a small segment of US 1 in the City of South Miami. b. The City has virtually no control over. most of the development which does now, or will in the future load trips onto US 1. City's Y _ ve18p c.. There is.a Metro Rail stanon in the heart of the Cit s oni Intensivedevelo ment area this MetmRail station puts extraordinary , commuter rail transit service at hand. Further, development .of. the MetroRail station will, further. state and local,, goals . for infllling'alreadv urbard ed areas and reducing .urban sprawl. d. Bus service with 30 minute headway is available along Bird Road. The availability of this transit service justifies the above level -of- service designation on Bird Road. e. In enacting this plan, the City has very substantially reduced the, amount of development that was permitted under the., plan; effective prior to 1989. and :.its implementing zoning ordinance. The City understands. that the Florida Department, of : Community Affairs believes reasons "a" hrough are sufficient justification for the standards set forth in the - above, but that. more I I . ': ( , 0 iv standards would not be consistent with the City's res onsibility to help minimize �eiTnlssl a sta d _ p p . :raffic congestion Future Traffic Circulation. . The recornrnended traffic circulation Man r or the City oi, South Miami is shown. !n attachment ?.11 and tabulated in attachment 2.9. This circulation Dian is based 'on the analysis of projected :rafflc volumes and levels of service standards. Neighborhood Traffic Management local traffic management plan is :to be im lemented.. The intent of the ro g p p o ram is to. muuFruze , ion -local traffic on local streets. 'Local roads'' will ''be prioritized for local . area traffic management implementation ,.techniques.. _, Implementation techniques will :Include- passive :echniques and physical controls. Bikewav and Pedestrian Circulation Bicycle and pedestrian facilities in South Miami will play an integral role in the future traffic Y P .. :ircuiation system (Attachment 2.1?). There are plans to construct a second level pedestrian he above plans there Is a need'-for a comprehensive lion ,anti the .downtown area. , In addition. to .valkwav between the South Miami hletroRail eta study. EAR Closeout Report 24 c � I .On+ ST gra Ad,' 5STH ST. U111ar 01, 64114 ST.. H�� flr• r �- i �3 .::. ., Traffic Ctrcutation system Source: Gt3y of Scutts Miam �ss7 25 ". EAR Closeout R ATI"AJUMMtINT '.'y 40TH ST +11 �:�___i Bpd Pd ILI j 1 - . 1. ter, L.> _ `t=li_ SITM ST II onrrE` rnr I I ' -- Uwe' 01 �Qw MISSION y ._ 04n+ST JUUU 11 L D - - III - LJ - l- T ST i ILL 11-771, �I�� of �n.�►� LIU. IL II � ��I L- : 1 Li fl�llaoTx ST ��.^ oi\es ai .. Jl -sr 6 Lane 01vldea 4 Line Olvldea 4 Lane 2 Lane SIgnatlzed Intersection Signaized Intersections and Roadw.a . .D. esl n .,, . . SO=@: WelerM. Kagetir.1987 ;AR Closeout Reaorz 26 f 0 I�,t. –�,— olr. .orsa sr ►' .. I 84d Ad •� � . icl -jj 41TW ST .II - .�, R -51TH 8T. O DE P�Lwrr M = i Not or. GACF Z"P I I il—z 'IT" ST.. � U 1 �, _ fli...11_ i t..or. C�C1U L = M ST. X: lissnri+c>,arsi ;.irc>tti' +�i.`�a�ta i.�rl ..I� - nil Or. � 1 to f1tLEI, ) IULI� II jU I�IIt�UI1�M Ci )TN ST. Olrb Ad �t . '`0,. ,� JS Functional. Classification Scums: Florida O.oanmsnt all Transaonation 1987 EAR Closeout Report p =C -7=' 111 State Principal. Arced ,..se>;taft Minor Arterial 27 _--� lIlI11I111 County Minor Arterial �_ .�� Cattttty Collector F7QSTL*iG 77RAFFI'C CONDrrroNS CTIY OF SO= MIAMI ..., - ,, FrirrIIIg'., . • .. Fri:iiII ,� ,. 1,... .... LOS 'D" Existing VlCat: Ezsaiiat� Roadway 1886 ADT Capad=r , Design LOS "D" . LOS. .. Bird Road W of Red Road '45.693 :5.8M 6LD, 12 C ' Miller Road W of Red.Road- ' 19,836. 15.700 2L ; I=, ; Sunset. Drive W of Dixie Hwy 4 L .90 0: Kandail Drive W of SW 67 Ave•' x.544. :5.700 2L . L43 F Ludlam Road S of Dixie Hwy' =58 ' :5.700' ' 2L .84 D N of Sunset Dr 13.680: :5.7D0 2L `. .87 D Red Road N of Kendall Dr, _ 16563 :5.700 2L' : L02 E .Hof Dixie Hwy 17.564 ,....'.5.000. 4LD .49 A . to 64th SL Dixie Hwy N of Kendall Dr 68.670 `3.840 6LD L23-1 F K of Sunset Dr 7LSM ' 55.840 6LD L29 F 6VX - Volume to Capauty Rana •'Datum shown is for point cn;Kendail Drive cuzmde the City of South Miami:, The portson of KendaiI Drive within the South. iami t;ity carries iess,tran c.,' _. Sources: Walter H. Keller Jr.._ Inc. Metro -Dade Public-.Works D�osrsment Florida Department of Transporiauon EAR Closeout Report 0 0 C La FA-1 -ilk MI L t%%wLX1y1r–V( L FF"I I =1 A0TH ST G s—_ZZ 0 kd SITU 9'r Ujust 0(. 7 64TH ST.: wanlaa Or. 7VM ST. iunm or. P- UUUL—,'L -1 UL I ULJ"L Eli' E]10 0 0 0 1 U\- L �� L �_ E= 2 t SOTH ST. D&wW Ad 3,6 0 EED., L7C1UU 03� 11 , � nnnqj ZZ,444 Existing Average Dally Traffic (AADT) Source: Florida 08cartmang of Transoonavon 1987 MO"-Oacs Transit Agarcy 1997 Z., momm, c 11 L it'll �ll� u1c F.10 71' , 553 7 1 —F EE I 15.963 EAR Closeout ReDorr -)q mnt rrtj 71 PIT A MT 0 O ATTACHMENT = ,::... ; : STMG 24 HOUR YRAFFiC NEmS ANALYSZ9 f OF SOUTH MIAMI ErfstinZ 'Cauiiw _. FAirdag ' Width Needed LOS "D" E istinz -Exhtin.x Eadsting:1. Prg=ind LOS 'D" byFystirig dway Lotion IBM ADT •Capw cy Design :.. V/C LOS tmrrvmat Beeds Volumes Road W of Red Road 45493. 55A00 6LD .82 C 6LD er Road W of Red Road 19.836 15,700 2L 126 F +2L (4 LO) . 1 41M set Drive W of Dixie Hwy 32338 381000 4LD .90 D 4LD dall Drive— W of SW 67 Ave 22444: 15.700. 2L 1.43 F +2L(4LD) 4LD lane Road S of Dias Hwy 11268, • LS.T00 ., Zi; .34 D 2L N of Sunset Or 1300 M700 2L 87 D 21. Road.. N of Kendall Or L%M 15.700 :2L ..:.. .LD2 E +2L(3L) 3L N of Dina Hwy 17360 X= 4LD , .49 A` `... 4LD e n*7 N of Kendall Dr 68.67D. '. 55.800 :.::. 6LD L23 F +2L(8LD) 8LD N of Sunset Or 77.993:. - 53 00 Gm L29 ' F, ' ' +2L (8LD) 8LD ttum shown is for point on Kendall Drive outside tha,City of South Miami. to pomon of Kendall Drive,within the South Miami City carries less teafHc *eea: Walter H. Killer Jr— Inc. Matro-Dade Public Works Department Florida Department of r. nsportation ;' 0 O AT ACHMENT ..8 s rnvC PEAR HOUR TRAFFIC N, =S ANALYSIS (� � 'Y OF SOLTI H MIAbU Existing Comatr, , Existing Width Needed LOS -ir Esistinx Ezistins Existing ?rxm:m C' LOS .-Ir , br E�osrin; Roadway Locark a 1986 ADT Capsory Deli VAC LOB Imvrvtffit Needs Volumes Bird Road W of Red Raad 2r70 2511 6LD .90 D Sim Miller Rand W of Red Road 085 4708 2L IM F : ±2L(4LD) 4LD Sunset Drive W of Dixie Hwy L607 I= 4LD 0.99 D 4LD Kendall Dore— W of SW 67 Ave LWO 0.706 �2L L49 F 42L(4LD) 4LD Ludlam toad S of Dixie Hwy 0.616 0,708 2L .87 D 2L N of Sunset Dr O,640 4708 ZL .91 D 2L . Red Road N of Kendall Dr 0.747 0,708 2L L06 E +1L(3L) 3L .N of Dixie Hwy 0822 L620 4LD .51 A 4LD Dixie iiwr N of Kanciail Dr 2214 2511 6LD I= F +2L (BID) alm N of Sunset Dr 7,389 2.511 6EZ L34 F a2L (81D) 8LD "Datum shown is for point on Kandsll Drive cutaide the City of South Miami.. The porvon of Kendall Drive within the South Miami City came less trariir- Sources: Waltar H. Faller Jr.. Inc Metro-Dade:Puhlie Works Deparment Florida Department of Trxnsuortevon 9 V < Z C6 z ,. c� C= jO y y 0 S� O ri Q�• MI Ui r U Ir 'GrY71 W ATrACHMENT =:9 ` Y Y Y. •Y � •Y Y Y I� � • Y Y Y V Y r .. .... r .. \ /r -c c�c3c� < c3 c3.,c�c3: �c3c3c3c� r COS. O 'CS O y • ppC COCO ED 00 ., O 000,. O•ppoo O- CO 00 00,. OQOO'� . . Ut�vtam :a rawca awoaW cjv. uv SSE •.� _� •� 8 �$ Soso '. ��r:• w nr n nsvn, •rr ► 9 a.9. , cm 4m n-W nr n�qn -V "P T T ♦♦ j till. co oocc o 00 0 ooc ao 00 00 ob0000 �,3� 0 0 o a o a -- v o m e- e- e- 0 Qu o o y A g -w www.r 8 9 Ci i �aCi•^ -� r034 n nnr cr13 rn nr rqr n i n���+ ° ■■�,+ T• � i 4 ' g n a B.r'Q cry ���, �•� c<i q c<i9 of o �� �� t0 t� • r OC �o OG �. _ • "" �_ �a i� v oG �o aC y S .0 a S$ a g �C3 33 as as - 07,33.2 Q .r Be e<. �4 .., .�... Z.A obi 9 V < Z C6 z ,. c� C= jO y y 0 S� O ri Q�• MI Ui r U Ir 'GrY71 W ATrACHMENT =:9 ` Y Y Y. •Y � •Y Y Y I� � • Y Y Y V Y r .. .... r .. \ /r -c c�c3c� < c3 c3.,c�c3: �c3c3c3c� r COS. O 'CS O y • ppC COCO ED 00 ., O 000,. O•ppoo O- CO 00 00,. OQOO'� . . Ut�vtam :a rawca awoaW cjv. uv SSE •.� _� •� 8 �$ Soso '. ��r:• w nr n nsvn, •rr ► 9 a.9. , cm 4m n-W nr n�qn -V "P T T ♦♦ j till. co oocc o 00 0 ooc ao 00 00 ob0000 �,3� 0 0 o a o a -- v o m e- e- e- 0 Qu o o y A g -w www.r 8 9 Ci i �aCi•^ -� r034 n nnr cr13 rn nr rqr n i n���+ ° ■■�,+ T• � i 4 ' g n a B.r'Q cry ���, �•� c<i q c<i9 of o �� �� t0 t� • r OC �o OG �. _ • "" �_ �a i� v oG �o aC y S .0 a S$ a g �C3 33 as as - 07,33.2 Q .r Be e<. �4 x T _ cl 4 73 Q .G C i u ti o z► ci - EAR Closeout Report 33 1832 Needs Design SLD 6LD 4LD 4LD 6LD 6LD 61M Qa-C 4LD 4LO 2L Um 2L X fim 4LD BLD BLD 1992 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC NF= ANALY5I3 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 19921 -Way East Needs Peak Hr Peak Fir Esistinsc .' 1993 Peak Dir Peaik Dir Needs : IM2 1982 LDS "D' Roadway Lamtioa Volume' Volume, Design Vic LDS Needs Bird Road ' EofLudIsm Rd 2.682 2311 '_6LD L07 E +2L (SLID E of SW 62 Ave 2221 ` 2.511 6LD •28 D Miller Road'..-'-,, E of LudLm'Rd ; LIM L620 " 4LD .68 8 -E dSW 62 Aw < 1228 L620 4LD .76 C Sunset Dsiva E of.Ludlam tad Z178' LIM 4LD L34 - F +2L(6LD) -, E of SW 62 Are •. -%- L948' " L620 , .., 4LD 120 F +2L (6LD) W of Red Road . 2A28 , 1620 LD I'm F +2L(6L13) Kendall Drive W of Red Road 793 L620 .. 4LD .49 A Ludlam Road N of Danis SE 1,170 , 706 2L L66 F +2L (4LD) N of Sunset Dr 974 706 ' 2L 1.38 , F +2 L (4 LD) N of Miller Rd 648, 706 2L .92 D SW 62 Ave N of Sunset Dr 1 46a 1:6,20 4LD M:. A N of Miller Rd '409 SW 2L., .69 , B Red Road :. N of Kendall Dr 847 ' I = 3L 80 C +2L (BLD) NofSunsecDr L?2I I= 41M Lod E +2L (41.13) ' '.. N of Miller Rd I'M ., .. , LSM ; 1L L03 E Own H' N of Davia'Dr, ' 3.131 ,. 3548, 8LD . - .94 C N of Sunset Dr 3.140, 33:8 8LD .94 C Sources: Welter H. Keller Jr.. Inc Metro -Dade Public Works, Deparcm ent- Sorida :Department of T ranapomation. 11 EAR Closeout Report 34 1832 Needs Design SLD 6LD 4LD 4LD 6LD 6LD 61M Qa-C 4LD 4LO 2L Um 2L X fim 4LD BLD BLD WU ST! Wed Rd.' 94TH ST.: Warms Oc. su a: a I= ST. Lei Davis Rd. . IL mm "Mon,'. gay 1 r.-� r� — McEccurY. l_ !saw Ell �.a CZ cxK � IEI ------------- Future Traffic Irculatlan Map Sauces: Hobart K Swanrcut tn==fataa 1997 a, O 2L Qsalortmes 2 laris street 4 LD . DaslQnateg a is divided street l 6LD Qe>tlgrtates 6 Iai divided street 3� Slats. Principal Am manwr.6tate Minor Artarla; 1111MIlI County Minor artery ".Mwcaunty Callsctcr EAR Closeout Report 35 �+tTV.nC `nt tTt� nit n Rats GOALS. OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES Goal 1 To maintain an overall transportation system which does not adversely affect residential neighborhoods but which provides for the circulation needs of all sectors of the community in a safe, efficient, cost-effective and aesthetically pleasing manner. Objective 1.1 Undertake only those improvements that both facilitate traffic Hotta and reduce adverse traffic impact on the neighborhoods thereby making neighborhood streets safer. Measurability shall be no major street midenings by 1994. See Objective 1.5 for non•motortzed transportation systems and 1.3 for convenient and efficient motorized transportation. Policy 1.1.1 Utilize the following level of service standards: Principal Arterials.. .. F' ' Minor Arterials 'F' Collectors " C. The above level -of- service . notwithstanding, development in the City shall be governed by additional terms and conditions agreed to by the City of South Miami and the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA). These terms and conditions are agreed to by the City and incorporated as part of this plan in order to facilitate a finding by the DCA that this Comprehensive Plan is in compliance with Florida law and the Florida Administrative Code. The additional terms and conditions agreed to by the City are as follows: 1. . Until December 31, 1995, the pea, oenod level of-wrvtce standard for US 1 shall be 115 percent of the peak penod traffic count in 1989. The City shall use the peak hour traffic data for 1989 avuiabie from the Florida Department of Transportation. 2 After December 31. 1995. the peal( period level- of -semce standard shall be i5o percent of D. capamty,for US 2. 3 The peak hour ievelof wrnce standard for Bird Road shall be 120 psrcenc of E capacity. t ' 'The City vnll not issue any new.eonstrueaon permit which would have the effect of lowering rho levei ofser ice on Bird Road or US 2 below the levels specified in "2' and "3" above uniess such permits are issued pursuant to a development of regional impact tDRI) approvai gr=nred prior to the eiTeccva data of this plan. The City. of South Miami views these standards as more restrictive than desirable m appropriate for the City, but accepts them as the most permissive standards that are likely to win approval. from the Florida Department of Community Affairs. The " _.City believes more permissive standards are in order for the following reasons: L There is oWy a small sagment of US 1 in the City of South Miami. b The City has virtually no control over most of the development which does now or will in the future load trips onto US 1. e Thar* is a idouvraif station in the heart of the City's only intanaiv* devriopment aroma: this Metroml station puts extraordinary commuter rail tranat service at hand. Further. development of the arvi around the Metroruf itanon will further situ and local goals for infilling aiready urbanized arssa and reducing urban spmwi. d Bus service with 30 minute headwaye is available along Bird Road. The availability of this tranat service justifies the above level-or-service designation on Bird Road. a In snaccng this plan. the City has very subatancally reduced the amount of dowlopment that was permitted under the plan effective prior to 1989 and its impismsnang zoning ordinance. The City understands that the Florida Department of Community Affairs believes reasons "a" through "e' are sufficient justification for the standards sec forth in "1" through "4" above. but that more permissive standards would not be consistent with the City's responsibility to help minimize traffic congestion. Cam✓' ._ „ ,,...,,. Element Page Number 214 Plan Page Number 57 proposed amendment transmitted to the FDCA by moon of the South Miami City Commismon 11.7.89 Policy 1.12 Continue to utilize the development plan review process to control roadway access points'and on =site traffic flow. .. Policy LIZ— By 1990. complete and begin implementation of a neighborhood traffic management program to discourage through traffic from utilizing residential • Objective 1.2 Achie,ve coordination of the Fu true Land Use Plan and this element. See polfefeY for measurability.' Policy 121 Avoid any major street widenings, in conformance with the Land Use Plan recommendations that call for protecting and enhancing both the residential neighborhoods and downtown. Policy 122 _ By 1990: review and refine the land development code to assure adequate on -site parking and traffic flow through site plan reviews. ' Objective 12 Coordinate City transportation planning with regional agencies to facilitate convenient and'ef{tcient' motorized transportation. See policies for .. measurability. 'Policy 1.3.1 '.' Work with the MPO and other regional transportation planning of iiciala to - secure changes in their plans to widen State and County roadways within South Miatni during 1988-1992. Policy 122 By 1999, undertake facility and program improvements to enhance use of Metrorar[ and buses including adequate access to the Metrorai[ Station to facilitate convenient- and efficient "motorized" transportation. Policy 12.3 Work with the MPO to achieve bus service to major employment concentrations. Objoctive LA Protect esisting'street rights -of -way including acmes points. Policy 1.4.1 although no`colleetar or arterial widenings are recommended by the City at this time, use development plan reviews and other means to protect existing right"f. way, most of which now can accommodate pavement widening. Policy 1.42 use the site plan and plat process to control curb cuts on public streets. O Objective iS By 1993. camp lete detailed plans for new sidewalks and additional bikeways, and begin implementation. a : Policy 1.5.1 ' See that the second lave[ pedestrian connector from the Bakery Centre to the Metrorail Station is constructed in accordance with the developer a PUD commitment: include sups to the sidewalk. Policy 1.52 Complete a detailed bikeway plan including access to the Metrorail Station and adequate on -site storage requirements through development coda site plans requirements.' " Policy 1.52 'Complete a plan for new sidewalk construction where deemed necessary; this is in' addition to the on -going repairing of existing sidewalks. Element Page Number 215 Plan Page Number 68 oposed amandmant transmitted to the FDCA by O P. scoon of the South Miami City Commission 11.7 -F 0.-,� c� CITY OF SOUTH- MIAMI 4� Major Problems of Development Florida Administrative Code Rule 9- J5.0053(6)a.4. r. COMPARISON, OF OBJECTIVE, TO; ACTUAL RESULTS This compares the rev p objectives and policies with the current conditions (� section cam arts the re previous co dit onsl a the ttune of adoption of the Comprehensive Plan in order to evaluate she effectiveness of the Plan regarding?tiie ".aciuevetnent'of the stated goals. The City of South Miami Comprehensive Plan utilizes supporting policies for specificity and measurability. This Evaluation & Appraisal Report will evaluate these policies to determine k whether the objectives (and, thus, the goals of the current. Comprehensive Plan) have been met. If The foilowing tables provide summary and conclusive inforination regarding the achievement of Po y , .. comprehensive The first, (left- hand) column states the policy; the each lic stated in .the Co rehensive Plan.. second column (Baseline Conditions .. ) describes uz summary terms the existing conditions' at the time of the adoption of the, Comprehensive Plan :(for.!comparison); the .third (... Measurability column states the basis for measurability (a ruler for measurement); the fourth (Actual Results) summarizes the current conditions as of the date of the Report in order to determine the progress toward goal achievement: and, the fifth (right -hand) column records the results of whether'or not the policy was achieved "(as, well as. extenuating, circumstances which may affect the results).' Recommended changes to the Com rehensive PIan based . on the results esuits of this section will be discussed in the section titled "Identification of Needed Plan Amendments" and the section titled "New Studies and Other Needed Actions." Revisions and updates to measurable targets set forth I; by the City will be reviewed' under the section ` entitled "New Goals,. Objectives: and Policies." r to EVALUA77ON AND APPRAISAL REPORT . III-B-30 'T n• N J t v r co r. R r riCt Eel L• G% cz a c� ti 0 r� cz I£-S'III IYOJ -rd 7MS WddY QNY NOl1Yn7YA3 sy n w p'n .(�.. p. pt po ^...'. CA CD -" CN ? t ►q �.: a CD, CD a }a awe Uj a_ Aso n. CD a M Cr cu .... ft pCp cow CA r;'��c7 ' ��� _ ct �. c CD r . •. � co .0 • G CD �. rr •'.L ..:.100 _Q� ? . Q� . n R 0 . •0 o z 0 Co cu a ri CD oa •�.� <' v cs OV IN cTo ct Z2ZZ _ a � W c ° r: C7 't a, a a L7 •rl �co B 0 ••� �Cb 'Wcncncr. ^n �_� �b o n.�_ cs n H 0 :9 CD ct Iw _ fi z; va a ra : G' c. D CD ce D y . rb co � n t �• c a v '(4C4 Cncn --3.0 �rA 7C� 0 f1 A 1 w R r Q C CA En A, o e Ct < ' �',° a► < cn �• Co c CD` G. A CD A = m a. cp A th Z Z Z Z 1��•�11 G .. A ? Sr ►< 3 Z Z,. -t C ►� Cn : LA i O Ic Cn W Cn a 'S7 C� y Z M m M z N V a M cu .... ft Cb a L„ � n R 0 . •0 a ri oa •�.� c 0 ct a � m Ct �co B 0 ••� Li cs n 0 D D y o' a � n t �• c a a 'S7 C� y Z M m M z N > CD .4 w CO -1 2 '.4 0 n cl 0 ft cu ct RE cs .Z3 Co CQ, CD n CD CV. Vl f1 C9 CD 0- cl; W 9 �Clo r7JE CD c", cv CD CD, m Co.= rb cp ct rz a c Co �. rte. Co * F VQ CO ri —0 Po c ra. CD cr eo M M M r n M M m _4 et old ZE 8 -ill IWOd3Y 7 VMWdd Y GS Y NOLL Vn 7 YA3 C n. w. Ir% RE cs .Z3 Co CD n CD CV. Vl f1 C9 0 aq CD 0 cu 87 CV �. rte. Co * F VQ ca —0 Cl. c ra. CD cr C4 CD r'3 0 a 0, VQ C3, Cb 'm R ct Z3 CD cn cm 0 0. CD co CL Mod-7d, 7MVHddY QNY NOLLYn7YA3 �.a c c9 - Cp 0 co a b CD CD c• W cs CD o c� O � . C•� VJ O cD .. pQ a.' A A �.�y'A O C' J.YOd3Tt 7YSIVWddV QNV NOLLVD7YZ3 O .. W o = tu O• G n W• PC c G cr UQ a C co 0 w Co 00 G -• A A f0 ln:r�_•� ...� co 0 In co n cn N ° cp Ul .y... �• ;a L'. is - ry or. .y... > �? .+• cry >�Q .ova. °r �� �' r `31 sa CD o —3;.= Q0ct4 r CD "g CD. �. .., a �' r c, c = ° co is .� CD b CL .A+ L � H f9 CC a �' �. < !a C V CD rA CA %rl o Ll 5 n vo ,,3 z:-o en CD a•o r,?f7p cs, m _. CD ca �....��ca c9 o �. xw �y oo ° ° 3 C7 0 a� low a �CD y b•°' arc. CO ••'a "' m C -ti cr p m mrnmmmMmM ! cn En tocncncacncnW w G7 s rfl n t'9 r w a c `•t �o b w �b � a o' a 00 n vJ• L•± n a n n 0 .Z R a a _ 0 s a, w ra s. b 0 R. M i•e H M. cz E� n_ O 00 O .. n .ti D C 0 ct•�'� Ao 0 A d -o .c .r o �_.: 4. cm va ..: :c cs fo riG' CA Cl En 0 C r .... v cr "o .:. A C:• 1 A• cm G. CD CD .. .� t U? fl) o n Q! .a • • C A .L7 CD < O • CD (y . =6 Co C" H7 C CL CCD SD N. O < CD' C m �. C C• Oa O n A 0 CD ^ C. tz.b� C � S. cn CD �, �' A O p CD V] ,a . -. f7 q C .�+ CD ^ C cl CD o C' 0. p ca c5 ❑ .L1 <. CD n = ca •• A Cl, i:...~ CD 'C . Cy C 'b C. C. CD CD cr ran m e w ra s. b 0 R. M i•e H M. cz E� n_ O 00 O .. n .ti D C 0 EO 0 0 tL a. D 0 O CD 0 Cl) cli < ti cv .o co ca A O cs V1 9£ - S - III .1210M 7VSIVycrdV ONV NOLLVl1 A3 o �: a y. f") 't7 , '' a. cr 5. 7 pz -v cr. M -F cn •V On cv C6 CD •� I . r X O 0'U to rr " tJl .. v • �' .^. rr Vi (/j 0 .. CD :.o CD n ev --+ to to y O C. r.. c9 ar �. ev F _ 'L7 .: < QC M 1 ca r CD :P.. ct C7 O A v% CM CD CD vo p' y 5t 5• �.• G• CD M a — .b °"' L, p. ct 0AD G- O. < O [�. < O .. O O cr O cl C O d `< 0O C 1 CD A CD RR77 ���iii o• o' t* cu : O ❑ 7 o A 0 CD CD CD �,•0 �v,5 IN co U3 0 tv Lv' a CD O • G. �. G. d. ^. . CP pi o CD = O • W y >. A O L7 C Gl • C O C T O C1 Co 'Q I "A O G. A CD CD =' CD CD CD CD O ' v L e'C rr tl bo I b �AI n 0 R n a. .Q 1 rn a 0� a Q• y a n A O` (711 c JOTW ST ere Ad. ,,, r�uu, n, nnilununrrnrnr,, r„ mm�rrr „n„„,,,�u�„u,n,nr,a,,,,r„n,,, L.. ii -i'-�� I ' H Ll t jI =WNW., Cr-1 � _ i a SiT1f ST 1 . DAM OaCWN" Yarer� Or. r. ��� r•r.r.������,��wrw�ra��,�����rM r� ��rr DAM CCLnry ,.rte.. a1TN ST. �1JL_.._..���,I 00 Aomeaa Or. II. —:1 dL1 — I� I IT lin i 4UMN9 Lit. 0 D 110 e• I ��I� � m■e�..i Route 72 �Q' nnnn �.c� �� Route 57 (— nnnnnumn RoutV 40 mum �-lC �` Route 56 Route 67 Route 52 scuts 3T Bus Routes Serving South Mlami Sounca; 1A.tro -Oad. Trana,t AgInCy 1457 EAR Closeout Report 30 I I n ITV P1 C',—'4 171 t t'TT t a a r w■ a+ Ci o of South Miami,. Traffic Calm Project; Intersection SW 64th Street and 59th Place Intersection Construct four, crosswalks, 4' wide consisting of colored, interlaced pavers each extending to a colorcoded neckdown that meets ADA standards, each crosswalk will measure approximately 56'- 6 This is an, angled intersection and will require crosswalks to be angled. plc Lane Alteration An island, 3 feet wide, in the center of SW, 64th. Street, remove tarmac and soil to a depth of 2' then fill with planting: soil suitable for tree planting. The island ' should be encircled by a solid cement curb 5" high and 6 7:across. Following are'the proposed modifications. . Extending East from SW 59th Place -59th PL- 59th CT: 50' island, 82' opening; -59th CT - 59th Ave:: 85' island, 145' opening; -59th Ave. - 58th PL: 81'_ island -At ensuing. intersections,. to. 5 7th 'Ave., encircled planters extending from the curb the width of the parking lane, remove', tarmac and soil -to a depth of 2' then fill with soil suitable for tree-planting. Extending West,of 59th PI: An island, 3= feet!wide in the center. of SW, 64th Street, remove tarmac and soil to a depth of 2', then fill with planting soil suitable for tree planting., The island should be encircled by a cement curb 5" high'and 6" -across. -59th PL --50th Ave.: island, opening; - 60th Ave. - 62nd'Ave. island opening 0 a it :9 ' p t' ll ,alIlr�, f} f91pIi JNI Ls'rfl �h 11}�7�+i��. �� `tl ��SI rf� fl in'iliullif.l{! !li!�11�I ill:tl:il�i�ll:. �s,� .•, ?" i w N1wq du "f f f } f nl , iJIL, , fit , mu.f , m yw of i • N i �juf,! .Iz}.1�f, 1: ii'lrinb: iii �i{if }rirsj117us(!�ff ij�'i`.'r�.lY,!s`•f�.IJis•: ti•.ui�r•• e . _.... }i`laUl;li tll;! � ail!.'• % °:'su - i;�;lpup<i? !';;.'.f•?�f�„ flF.a ;TO •Lhfl..?crif, �44i O ' ..,.o: ...�.:;. O• iiu% f A..�/R t• iy s:iNii itwK.i LA�'.A.:nAfW.W "'.4.6 t k.yA•.iw.�: AH�i Vif•i•1;� ^+iyNV�sAeI,.Sbt�,uy K:ur:Li }./.Ni,aL,j�l ti !N /. a •a.s.: s s �Gy///iA,.✓ //W % �f1n y�er, y : « rn.+�wr+�sa ..K,w.. y'^iyuA• �N: �M�fl!+. Si I. s ..4/ ; rryw.t..vv Y: • "rr Iyi .s. rW. iY kn- :y • % / /N //�.� %rSYn 1= .f /O // y L S � Sr"r•f• N��/H / Y . ,S S 1. YA 5 �jrJ "sji;.s.i•%:'s:tin y .nn.- % y /. bit'•H' /•. H:S.w. : : >.r . ..i'. ...5 £6b. ..n •it .e,i s..f•: � A* 01 EO • ..:•• :..:N. ' : "•::•...� :. :•: �:: •.tom ..:. :. ; ;. o :. `• ff. 's ` \:.::::�..'; ::. o....... b........o.........o . ................... ............................ . ........... ............ a it :9 ' p t' ll ,alIlr�, f} f91pIi JNI Ls'rfl �h 11}�7�+i��. �� `tl ��SI rf� fl in'iliullif.l{! !li!�11�I ill:tl:il�i�ll:. �s,� .•, ?" i w N1wq du "f f f } f nl , iJIL, , fit , mu.f , m yw of i • N i �juf,! .Iz}.1�f, 1: ii'lrinb: iii �i{if }rirsj117us(!�ff ij�'i`.'r�.lY,!s`•f�.IJis•: ti•.ui�r•• e . _.... }i`laUl;li tll;! � ail!.'• % °:'su - i;�;lpup<i? !';;.'.f•?�f�„ flF.a ;TO •Lhfl..?crif, �44i O ' ..,.o: ...�.:;. O• iiu% f A..�/R t• iy s:iNii itwK.i LA�'.A.:nAfW.W "'.4.6 t k.yA•.iw.�: AH�i Vif•i•1;� ^+iyNV�sAeI,.Sbt�,uy K:ur:Li }./.Ni,aL,j�l ti !N /. a •a.s.: s s �Gy///iA,.✓ //W % �f1n y�er, y : « rn.+�wr+�sa ..K,w.. y'^iyuA• �N: �M�fl!+. Si I. s ..4/ ; rryw.t..vv Y: • "rr Iyi .s. rW. iY kn- :y • % / /N //�.� %rSYn 1= .f /O // y L S � Sr"r•f• N��/H / Y . ,S S 1. YA 5 �jrJ "sji;.s.i•%:'s:tin y .nn.- % y /. bit'•H' /•. H:S.w. : : >.r . ..i'. ...5 £6b. ..n •it .e,i s..f•: � A* 01 EO 96-811, IN L661 'lady pu3 uononuisuo:) 9661 `s?go)ap >$ uonotu2suo0 9661 'jogo }op 2unoayq uononnsuoo -wd 9661 'ioquuoldoS uotssmrxoz) �g ppmy 2 =uoo 9661 'isn8ny .. Suivadp pig _ - 966i 'isnSn V , 2u92?1I pt g- 9661 •lsn8nV . luauiaszuanpy ptg 9661 `SInt s3uir i cr uStsaQ o l-c olddy pa�ojduiop ... sBntM q usisoa - agnQ3HZ)S HALLYINSI su81s ij2ns pug 2uldcospulei•'niaisAs uol=jjo:,),sannos •uzaisxs uopngpasip xmm -'Wm {s a2�umjp 'ssaiin2 puE gins sxjvmopts ;'fiulned 8utpnlout 'siu2uionozduit aaatlS MOlri 3a 3dOoS (Z I E6I S!i Eti8I S!1 "t�trL1 S(S9Ztr:1 S JSQO) iLmjE) xzoig amtudoionaO Alrununuop :30unos 3NIUNOA bLZ`ctrtr5 :130ana ClEA01MV •ouI'uosugoj pug llgssng •s=tlllM !M!w dznos jo Alm sanuany 09-65 ,A'iS. Pt S3aanS 179 Z9 )kAs sivaunnolduil iaails -g -B gngd tiueiW ginoS :INV.Llf1SNp0 NJIS"3uI :RwvN JZ)3CO2id .LINn,1.rt3v�aoZ3liaQ r1�a�n .LNawd0'I3A3Q OIwomO03 (INV JUINt1IhY1iOO 30 301330 )Ull oz) aubu Nvillod02i. gN % N ... . ... .... ..... to ...... ..... Liwl": N.V.: ...... ... ....... otm. io m• ... .. .... .. . .. .... ce .. ......... . ... ...... . ;t N:i JE . ....... ... ....... . ......... . AtM F ... ... . .... O . ........... 01 ...... . . .. . .. .. ...... ....... ..... ...... .... . ........... ..... . ........ ... ........ . . 0 0 /I PG. 16. AGGRAVATED BATTERIES ' CASE # ADDRESS'. 209. 68 ST: SW.: 61•, CT 570. 6172 ',SW' 68• ST. 1311 6100,"'BLK SW. 68 `ST.. ;. 1760 ' ' 6800 SW 8. PL.. 2069 .69 ST.: : SW 62 AV. 3743' .'.x,6000' BLKi SW• 64 ST. .5246B 59.07 .SW. 68 -ST.: 5820* 6429' SW. 60 AV. '. •'5987 64 .ST. SW. 60 ' AV. 6049 .6700; SW 62 CT'... 6339 63 ST. 'SW.60 AV..' 6341 63Q0 BLK SW 60 AV. .. 6356 : 6038 ••SW, 63 ST.: 6703 6305 SW 59'AV 7500 6066' SW •62 TE. 8052 6124' • SW 63 ST 8458 6166 'SW 68 ST,- �r .r.: j °ti .iF. t .7t J,0."Yr? C: DS Zt %' 4 bra S tK +Y G!. :. •Y:. . 9990 6400 •. SW- '59 PL. 10095 69 ST. SW 57 PL. 10327'" 6039 SW 63 TE. ; TOTAL:, ' 20. AGGRAVATED•ASSAULTS CAE ADDRESS> 246 68 ,ST. SW fi 669 5950.. SW "68 ST.. . 902 6124 SW� 64 TE. 1936 ':68 'ST. SW 58 PL. . 2707 5889. SW 72. ST. - 5206 5701 .SW. 721ST. 6187 6441 SW- 58 :AV. 6921 5986 SW .•66 'ST. _. 69.73 6400..' BLK : SW 59 PL. 7853 i 6425.:SW, 57 'CT, 8090 .5896 SW 66 ST: 10036 7080: SW 59'PL.: TOTAL: ., 12 . AR ON _ . .J• CASE ADDRESS 5934 6000 BLK SW 66 TE. stta'a1I:T �� bM Rd. L I 1AIM Of dJ�� i2.Zl ZTY %.t T sti Zp T 't.�._i 1..� G.. LEI�I 0 0 The City of South Miami Police Patrol Zones O Off— ., �s r dJ�� i2.Zl ZTY %.t T sti Zp T 't.�._i 1..� G.. LEI�I 0 0 The City of South Miami Police Patrol Zones O c The: below, depicted chart and graph represent the total annual Felony, Misdemeanor, and Traffic Arrests made bv.'the, South Miami Police Department during the associated year. Annual Arrests'1991 through 1995 - Year ' 1991' 1992 1993 1994 1995 TOTALS Arrests 1099...., 707 624.:. .856 776 .... 4062 ,. ARRESTS The below depicted chart represents the. activities of the South Miami Police De artment Uniform p _ , ;Patrol Division during the years 199,4: and 1995: Uniform Patrol Division Statistics 1994 through 1995 195. :Diference . Werence C ategory o o Miles Patrolled,,', 235;233:' .1233,701 - 1532 J-1. 0.01 % Calls br. Service Field Interview Cards Open Doors Located 58;667 65.261 6594 ; .. ....10 .% 1437 1538 101 .6% 82 I 142 1 60 .1 42% 10. 0 0 0 Court Summons Issued 5029 5224 195 3% Watch Orders. Checked _ . 25,210 38,280 13,075 34% Felony Arrests 222 241 19 7% Misdemeanor Arrests 379 339 - 40'. , - 10 % Traffic Arrests 255 196 , 59 - 21% Arrest Assists:: 1074 852-- .-,23.3 - 20 % Crime Prevention, Cards 435 5117 .4,682',. T000 Messages Apprehended . 408 361 -47 . = 11 % Vehicles.Im . pounded, 309 285 - 24 I 7 Reports Written � 6677 ; � 6645 -32 ; : -' .005 Traffic Promises to.Appear." 528,E ... 518' Property Recovered (by item) 401 38.7... - 141— ° -_3..�0 Arrest Warrants Served ;: ,. ,20.1 192 - 9 4% 4 % 10. 0 0 0 ( �f AOTH ST.r, 81rd Rd.' j 56TH 51111�r 64TH ST.; 'ffrd�� lh. r� 72ND sT inn Nil v i5 i Ic U} 7 n. tv^CJ;! {tf BOTH SL ' M •`> ' i ^ i Dsdg Rd. .�� nnn[ Sanitary Sewer Service Area Source: C4 of South Miami 1987. vim 7 L L C° era l-= COMMON •._t' Service Are EAR Closeout Report 54 ntTV nc 0 n I 1 r J 1%MI A lIAi • LAND USE ANALYSIS Adequacy of Trsn q sporsation Facilities Exceoc for Bird Road. ail South Miami rondways where counts are avaliable are at level of service %LOS) 'D" or worse.. Both Ludiarn Road and Sunset Drive are operatinglust over capacity. but Kendaii Drive: Red,Road and U.S. '1 are operating in the LOS "E" and 'F" ranges. Existing ieve(s of,service are detailed tn;Table 2.5 of the Traffic Circulation Element. " r The South Florida Flonda Regional Planning Council has established LOS "D ". as the appropriate LOS standard except in special cases where a level of service LOS °E" is,acceptable. Special cases include central business district locations and stree ' ere existing cs.wn development prectudes widening. " The "South;Florida Regional Planning Council LOSM" standard is not accepted as City of South Miamt'ooticy. The LOS D7 stanaard'would..require major,widenings that would adverseiy'affect the residential character of the City.' It would also further congest downtown due to additional tratiic using Sunset Drive and Red'Road. Instead, this comrnutec. trarfic should use high design, artertals that do not pass,through residential areas. Furthermore: 'non•attainment of liigher, standards could ultimateW freeze deveionment,permits.; The following service levels are set for both 24 -hour and.peak -hour periods P-incz:)arArteriais LOS "F" i `(.no ' ' •r ftirterisis LOS "F" . Collectors LOS "C" Roadway. improvements programmed within the City 6f South Nliamffire listed in the 1988 Metropolitan Dade County Transportation Improvement Program MP). The TIP specifies proposea. transportation. projects programmed to be implemented in the coming live , years:. T a'roadway improvements listed for:impiementanon. within the City of South Miami :arc: Iloadaay Location Improvement Year Red Road U.S.' 1 to S.W. 6 Street ' :Widen 'from 4990.91 r 2 lanes to 4 Miller Road Ludlam Road to Red Road. Widen 'trom '989.90 2 lanes to 4 Adequacy of Sanitary Sewer Facilities About, one -third of the City of South Miami is served by sanitary sewers.:-This area is located primaniv between 64th Street on the north and 80th Street on the south, and between 57th Avenue on the east and 63rd'Avenue on the west. It is illustrated in Figure 4.1 (page - 4.8) of the.Inirascructure Element. The.btii mi -bade Water and-Sewer Department ?NASD) is responsible for the collection system and the treatment' plant. South Miami generates much less than one percent of the capacity of the Central District Treatment Plant at Virginia Kev; which, serves the area. Demand on existing collection facilities is not expected to increase. since the City's population' is not expected to increase significantly before tne•year 3005. Some up- sizing of mains might be necessaryin business areas if, much higher; intensity development than currently exists were to occur. The pomon of South Miami not served by sanitary , sewers is served by septic tanks. For the most part. soil conditions to the City are suitable to septic tank operation. It is a matter of `regionai ooiicy to ultimately' eliminate•the,use *oi septic tanks on Jots smaller than one acre. - r 1 l Element Page Number l.5 Plan Page Number 5 l� TO: Mr. Bill Pratt,- Direct office of Development FROM: Chief Rafael P. Henn e DATE: December 1.9 1995 SUBJECT:' Project Assistance acaaaasMW=MMM =as a =asmumMMMMMMMMMMM an MMM'MUMMNUMMI MM* =W =WWW>.===araam = =Nunn=W Per your request of December 7, 1995, attached is an in -depth study of .. the . criminal activity for the areas indicated during the. past two..years... . A check...with Amy Reyes, a Fire I Code Inspector (716 - 7615)`reveals that there were no known fire code.. violations during this'period: If there is any other information you desire, do not hesitate to advise. Please be assured of our cooperation in all matters of mutual concern . . RH /Lid /E Att/ cc: Lt. M. Mills ��1 swimming. The City Recreation Department should'work with Metro -Dade Parks and Recreation. Department and ` the Dade County School Board to. assure that nearby facilities ' are available to South Miami residents. The City. could also explore point use'agreements ,with school officials for the use of school grounds. SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING, COMMISSION POLICY PLAN There are two provisions in the SFRPC plari. that have special significance for South Miami. 1: , . TRAFFIC: The regional plan recommends a level of service of at least "D" ,. during peak hours in -Dade County. This is a "problem for South Miami as mentioned earlier in the Future Land Use Element section.,, However, the SFRPC plan allows for a "Special Transportation Area" which can operate. with a level of service of "E ". Therefore, the City should explore this designation. 2. SEPTIC TANKS: The plan ' = recommends that the area.'served by septic tanks "sewers., sizes Most of South Miami lots are less shou onela ce, thconnected mo sanitary Y phasizing ; the need for sewer line extensions. r EAR Closeout Report 70 C N Id Oki • I L •�ti s. Vice, Intelligenc . e &Narcotics 'Statistics for 1995 CATEGORY.. _ TOTALS VIN Unit arrests, for 1995- (total} 84 Felony Drug Charges (State) Felony Drug Charges '( Federal) 12 Misdemeanor Charges 06.. Narcotics Search Warrants _ ..... _.. _... 00 Alcoholic Beverage Search Warrants 00 Arrest Warrants'obtained 31 Cocaine Seized 13 Kilograms . ' Heroin Seized . 1 Lbs. Marijuana Seized 00 Steroids Seized . 2014 Units Total`Value of Narcotics Seized $ 1,5259350.00 Laundered U.S. Currency Seized $ 1;100,000.00 Vehicles Seized >... 7 Currency Seized $ 79:150.00 14. Monthly Assigned Cases and Clearance Rate Month- � �- - Cases � es Assigned �; Cases Cleared 'Clearance, Rate by %; Sept. Percentage Cases Cleared- 23.6 % AJ 1: 362% February ......... 84 19 .._ .. 22.6 %° . March . _..._._....._ .78 ... ..... i9..,.. _ 24 .4 April .......... 74 . 18 .._ .. 24.4 % May., _ _420-- ,. _..,. ..23,.. ....... . 191%'21 . June _._. _ ..................... 92 ._..._.........� ...:. 21._ .........., ... . 2191/6',_ July 121... _.... 27.: ., 22:4 August ' 126 _ 29... _... _ . 234 September -, °' d 96 22 23 October 86 24 27.9 %,.: November IDecember'.182 78 .15 19 .3 14 17.1 _Cases Assigned. /.; Cleared . Cases As for 1995 1,142 Cases Cleared for 1995 - -- 269 ---Dec. Nov Oct. _...... Sept. Percentage Cases Cleared- 23.6 % AJ 1: Jun. The Criminal Investigations May Mar. Division recovered S 1,397,669.00 Jan: in stolen property in 1995. 15. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Total Cases Claared ® Total Cases Asslgnad 0 �J 0, . O The depicted chart and graph represent the Criminal Investigations Division's monthly case clearances by clearance type.. :'Monthly Clearance by Type Month Cleared by Arrest Exceptionally Cleared Unfounded Cases, - January 22 9 7 February, 10. 5- .4 .March _ 13, April :. 7 9 2. May 11. 10 2 June i4 4 3 July 17 5' 5 August 12 12 5 September 6 10 6. October Y 10 7 November 5 .. -.. 5 5 December 6_ 3 $ TOTALS 133 94 52 Clearance Rate by Type ec. Oct. -{ Sept. Jul: Jun.. -t May , Matr. - Feb. Jan. 0 5 10 15 20 25 ® Unfounded ® Exceptionally. Cleared ® Cleared by Arrest 16. The below depicted chart and graph represent the comparisonof,Part One offenses as reported to the South Department, partment durin 994 �` r and.,1995 f Part One 'Crimes�reported; d the South Miami Police Department Offense 1994 1995 % D>tfference .; Murde"r" 2,.. 1 7. -50% Sexual Battery 3 3 0 Robbery .. 102 75 -26% :. Arson 2'- 2 0% Burglary ... 256 292 Larceny. 4b0.:._ .. Assault,.' ._._�._. �. _ ,_... _......_5.6 ...._ 61 .. Auto Theft :.......... .......... 161 __ .160. 0 Part One Offenses Auto Theft Assault Larceny Burglary I i Arson Robbe ry ! I f Sexual Battery J�. �.'.. . Murder — 0 100 200 300 400 500 ■ 199, 1994 17. 0 CHIEF'- t1J•N MfAM FVL..u, city of"' South Miami Police Department INTER- OFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Chief Rafael Hernandez From • L edly Moss. Date: December 19 1995: Subject: Criminal. Activity Information = aaa=== c... a�a= 3maassaassa�ms�ssaasasassasa :ssss : =s�easassssaassss City of South Miami Polite Department Subjects CRIMINAL ACTIVITY INFORMATION 0 !!i!!!TED ! ilia!!!! iliiiiilili!!!!! liiii !!ilii!!!!liii!!!!!ii!!!!!i!Q LIS BELOW IS THE INFORMATION' REQUESTED REGARDING CRIMINAL ACTIVITY FOR 1994 THROUGH NOVEMBER 12,,.1995 IN THE AREA OF SW 62 -. 72 ST/57 -62 AVE. _..1994 ... , ..::... RESIDENTIAL BURGLARIES .. CA SE ADDRESS CAE ADDRESS • 10 6166.-SW X68 ST. 11606 5911 SW 64 ST. 236 6091 SW 64 TE. 11848 6524 SW 57 "AV. 325 654„4 SW 57 AV. 12137 5917 SW 62 TE. 823 6210 SW, 59 PL. 1203 6175 SW 64 TE. 1262 6067 SW 62 TE. 1263 6295` ,SW 58 PL. 2064 6300 SW 58 PL. 2562 5960 SW 66 TE. 2573 5917 SW 63 ST. 2650 6429 SW 59 PL. _ 2675- 6150 SW 63 ST. .- 3160 6332 SW 60 AV. 3424 6050• SW 63 ST. 3675 5885 SW 62 TE. 3722 5982 SW 66 ST. 4986 5912 SW 66 ST. 5227 6524 SW 57 AV. 6077 6110 SW 63 ST. 6162 6501 SW 58 AV. 6284 6647 SW 59 PL. 6584 6156 SW 68 ST. 7130 6525/6544 SW 57 AV. 7219 6175 SW 64 TE. 7544 5904 SW 67 ST. 11481 6524 SW 57 AV. =1 TOTAL: 29 .. ",7n 1995 C RESIDENTIAL BURGLARIES'` CASE X ADDRESS 413 6175 SW 64 TE. 550 5966 SW 62 ST. 729B 6012 S 68 ST. ` 1862 5968 SW 68 ST. 2655 6109 SW 62 TE. 3184 7029 SW 61 AV. 3328 5875 SW 62 TE. 3972 6400 SW 58 PL. 4521 5875 -SW 66 ST.. = = 4621 6238 SW 59 PL. 5378 5961 SW 68 ST. .6111 6722 SW 59 PL.' 6485 6279 SW 59 PL. 6493 6165 'SW 63 - ST. 6548 6643 SW 59 PL. 6732 5928 SW 63 ST. 8851 5962 SW' 66 TE. 9065 5930 SW 62 ST.. 9679 6017 SW 63-ST. 10088 6431 SW 58 AV. 10276 6132,SW 63 ST. TOTAL: 21 C PG.2 COMMERCIAL - BURGLARIES' CASE n ADDRESS 610 5854 S. DIXIE HY. 811 5854. S. DIXIE':, HY 1182 5897 SW 69 ST. 1385 5996 SW 70 ST. 1477 5805 SW 72 ST. 1496 5959 SW 71 ST. 2704 5805 SW 72 ST. 3533 5801 SW 70 ST. 5454 5795 SW 72 ST. 6639 5825 SW 68 ST. 6658 •6845 SW 59 PL. 6712 5838 SW 68 ST. 6723 5825 SW 68 ST. 6997 5801 SW 70 ST. 8110 6845 SW 59 PL.. 8736 5875 SW 72 ST. 8864 6600 SW 57 AV. 10247 .7040 SW 61 AV. 11146 5925 SW 69 ST. TOTAL: 19 I. °I PG. 3 VEHICLE BURGLARIES -CASE # ADDRESS CASE.. # ADDRESS 57 5900 SW 62 TE. 8108. 5925 SW 69 ST. 667 72Q0 BLK SW 58 CT. 8182 5925 SW 69 ST. 907 70" ST /S. DIXIE HY. 8400 �'5801 ' SW 70- ST. "- 1037 5927 SW 70 ST. 8425 6840 SW 58 PL. 1100 5775 SW 72 ST. 8673 "' 5945 SW 72 -ST. 1114 68 ST SW 58 AV. 8680 6545 SW, 57 CT:, 1602 5805 SW 72 ST., 8765'° 5925 SW 69 ST. 1603 5823 SW 72 ST. 8839 6100 :�BLK SW 68 ST. 2134 6445 SW 57 CT. 8968. 5925 SW 69 ST" 2179 5842 SW.72 ST. 9027 5960 -SW 72 ST 2241 72 -73 ST /57 -CT. 9063 5.900 BLK•'SW 69 ST. 2550 5701 SW 72 ST. 9152 �5886: CCtT mm LN. 2580 5885 SW 72 ST. 10472 5949 SW 72 ST! .2761 57 -95. SW 72 ST. 10694 5868' C VERCE LN. 3229 69 ST. SW 59 PL. 10857 5700SW 72 ST.' 3313 5701 SW 72 ST. 11080: 5886 CCMME2ZCE LN. 3483 6600 SW 61 CT. 11123' 5820" CCMMERCE'LN. 3541 5949 SW 72 ST. Y 11534 5927 SW 70 ST 3569 5701 SW 72 ST. 3784 7031 SW 62 AV. 3829 69 ST. SW 62 AV. 3995 6101.SW 72 ST. TOTAL: 68' 4315 6800. -SW 57 AV. 4622 5795 SW 72 ST. 4641 5701' SW 72 ' ST. 4742 6845 SW 59 PL. 4916 5950 SW 68 ST. 5169 5700 BLK SW 68 ST. 5332 6620 SW 57 AV. 5526 5800.BLK SW 72 ST. 6066 • 7031 SW 62 AV, 6069 5927 SW 70 ST. 6310 5828 SW 71 ST. 6339 6600 5W 57 AV. 6340 7080 SW 59 PL. 6478 5701 SW 72 ST. 6744 5960 SW 70 ST. 6823 6790 SW 57 AV. 7214 6600 BLK SW 61-CT. 7241 6100 SW 62 ST. 7364 6701 SW 62 AV.. 7374 6701 SW 62. AV. 7427 5844 COMMERCE LN. 7428 5874 SW 69 ST. 7634 5700 BLK SW 66 ST. 7887 5897 COMMERCE LN. 8054 5865 COMMERCE LN. 8095 5701 SW 72 ST. 8096 5701 SW 72 ST. 8097 7150 SW 57 AV: PG.4 ARID ROBBERIES CASE ;ADDRESS 161; 72,; ST. SW 59 PL. 739„ ; : ~;63.00 BLK SW-62 AV. w 807 ,: ;:..68 ST.. SW 59 AV. 187.7 ::592,7 -••SW .70 ST. 2387 :... .'6790;,SW 57' AV. 2391 SW 57 AV. 2797 ,.6620 6601,SW 62 AV:' 3087 ' 6790. SW 57 AV. , 3429 ; 6800 SW • 57 ; AV. 3563. 68,~ST. SW 59. PL. 4396 64� ST. SW 57.,AV. 4614 " -.5960!-.SW 66; TE' 5.031 -5897 :SW 69-ST. 5039 6790: SW 5'7 AV: 5057 68 ST. SW 58"AV. -' 5416 5701 SW 72 ST. 7446 72 ST. SW 62 AV. 8895 67 ST. SW 61.'CT. 8909 67 ST: SW '58 'PL. = - 8934 5825 SW 68 ST. - �J 9022 6790 SW 57 AV. !" 9378 68'*'ST. SW 59 PL. 10260 6412'SW 59 PL. 10983 68 ST. SW 59 PL. 11108 6600 SW 57 AV. 11921 5927 SW 70 ST. TOTAL: 26 PG.5 STRONG ARM ROBBERIES a CASE # ADDRESS 2511 5975 SW 72 ST. 2618 66 ST: SW 61 CT. 2670 64 ST. SW 60 AV. 3024 64 ST. SW 59 PL. 3516 5927 SW 70 ST. 3881 71 ST. SW .59 PL. 3882 70 ST. SW 59 PL. 4261 6800 BLK SW 61 CT. 4716 64 ST. SW 59 PL. 5117 6510 SW 57.CT. 5180 6060 SW 66 ST. 6685 70 ST. SW 59 PL. 7076 68.ST. SW 59 AV. 7696 67 ST. SW 61 CT. 7707 67 ST. SW 61 CT. 9372 5700 S. DIXIE,HY. 10025 6790 SW 57 AV. 10308 6600 SW 57 AV. 10382 5949 SW 72 ST. 10760 6790 SW 57 AV. 10838 68 ST. SW 58 AV. 10840- 64 ST. SW 59 PL. 10865 6000 SW 68 ST. 10888 66 ST. SW 61 CT. 11215 6800 SW 57 AV. 11662 5900 SW 67 ST. 11690 5870 SW 70 ST. 11992 60 ST. SW 59 PL. TOTAL: 43 1 PG 6 CASE # 434 488 746 919 1069 1394 1532 1639 2066 2138 3100 3384 3546 3615 3795 4000 4089 4394 4420 6564 6683 6802 6807 6817 7163 7301 7939 8098 8143 8929 9126 9414 10274 ].0465 10472 10614 10615 10810 11235 12106 AUTO THEFTS' 6620 SW 57 AV. 5967 SW 69 ST. 6600 SW 57 AV.", 6704 SW 59 PL. 5845 SW 68 ST. 6800 BLK:SW 59 PL. 66 ST. SW 61 CT. 6601 SW 62 AV. 7000 BLK SW 61 CT. 5801' SW 72 ST. ' 72 ST. SW 57 CT. 5700 BLK SW 73 ST. 70 ST. SW 61 CT. 6600 SW 57 AV. .5949 SW 72 ST. 7200 BLK SW 57 CT. 5949 SW 72 ST. 7100 SW 58 AV. 5949 SW 72 ST. 5775 SW 72 ST. 5701 SW 72 ST. 6601 SW 62 AV. 5949 SW 72 ST. 5900 BLK SW 66 TE. 66 ST. SW 60 AV. 6524 SW 57 AV.. 5949 SW 72 ST. 5701 SW 72 ST. 6800 BLK SW 61 CT. 5801 S. DIXIE HY. 6601 SW 62 AV. 5949 SW 72 ST. 7.020 SW 64 .CT. 68 ST. SW 57 AV. 5949 SW 72 ST. 5844 SW 72 ST. 5844 SW 72 ST. 72 ST. S. DIXIE HY.. 7031 SW 62 AV. 7100 BLK SW 61 CT. TOTAL: 40 0 0 TOTAL: 37 PG.7 GRAND THEFTS CASE TM ADDRESS 471 71 ST. S. DIXIE HY. 493 5886 COMMERCE LN. ' 1210 5927 SW 70 ST. 2156 5875 SW 69 ST. _ 2405 5870 SW 62•TE. 2643 72 ST. SW 57 AV. 2836 5721 SW-72 ST. 3120 5701 SW 72 ST. 3178 5925 SW 69 ST,.. :.. 3819 71 ST. SW 59 PL. 4137 6075'SW 72 ST. 4220 5775 SW 72 ST. 4274 5857 COMMERCE .LN. 5048 6521 SW 62 AV. 5220 6601 SW 62 AV. 5544 6701 SW 62 AV. 6017 5975 SW 72 ST. #505 6300 67 ST. SW 58 PL. • 6630 6443 SW 60 AV. ; 2 7080 5818 SW 72 ST. 7374 6701 SW 62 AV.' 7793 5975 SW 72 ST. 8655 6840 SW 58 PL., 9089 5795 COMMERCE LN. 9102 5949 SW 72 ST. 9256 5701 SW 72 ST. 9292 6193 SW 72 ST. 9395 7209 SW 59 AV. 9435 7200 S. DIXIE HY. 9479 6400 ELK SW 59 PL. 10245 -5701 SW 72 ST. 10373 6519 SW 60 AV. 10646 5750 SW 72 ST. 10734 72 ST. SW 62 AV. 11000 5975 SW 72 ST. 11259 7200 ELK SW 59 AV. 11269 5833 SW 72 ST. TOTAL: 37 PG.8 • HObdICIDES CAE ADDRESS 9720 6400 SW 62 AV. 9979 67 ST. SW 59 PL. ,,. .. TOTAL: 2 _ SERVAL OFFENSES': ' CAE ADDRESS 6250 5896 SW 66 ST. ;9 8164 6000.SW 72 ST. 9192 7150 SW 57 AV. TOTAL: 3 0 PG.9 a AGGRAVATED ASSAULTS CASE # AGGRAVATED'BATTERIES SE ADDRESS 23 6172 SW 68 ST. ~" 2292 6113 SW 69 ST. 2897 5950 SW 68.ST. 3169 68 ST. SW 58 AV. 4017 68 ST. SW 59 PL. 4038 71 ST. SW 61 AV. 4314 5900 SW 68 ST. 5177 66 ST. SW 59.PL. 5265 6083 SW 62 TE. 6239 5962 SW 66 TE. 6879 6117 SW 64 ST. 7895 6500 ELK SW 57 CT. 7997 5850 SW 73 ST.' 9799 6700 ELK SW 61 CT. 10933 6706 SW 59 PL. 12052 5987 SW 69 ST. 6200 5912 SW TOTAL: 16 a AGGRAVATED ASSAULTS CASE # ADDRE S S 33 5950 SW 68 ST. 828 68 ST. SW 59 PL. 856 6511 SW 58 AV. 862 5920 SW 67 ST. 2673 6175 SW 64 TE. 3259' _ 5800 •SW 66 . ST. 3326 .66 ST. SW 57 AV. 3522 5925 'SW 64 ST. 6200 5912 SW 63 ST. 8341 68 ST. SW 59 PL. TOTAL: 10 ARSONS NONE PG. 11 CASE . # 1486 1683 2011 2049 2208 2985 3054 3055 3705, 3952 4172 4358 4744 5258 5439 6081 6087 6642 7048 7410 8860 QOMMERCIAL BURGLARIES_ ADDRESS 5806 C COMMERCE L LN. 5842 C COMMERCE L LN. 6600 S SW 57 A AV. 6780 S SW 57 A AV. 5880 C COMMERCE L LN. 6420 S SW 62 A AV. 6829 S SW '59 P PL. 6845 S SW 59 P PL. 5701 S SW 72 S ST. 5845 S SW 68 S ST. " " 5819 C COMMERCE L LN. 6602 S SW 57 A AV. 6129 S SW 70 S ST. 5880 C COMMERCE L LN. 7171 S SW 62 A AV. 6121 S SW 68 S ST. 6125 S SW 68 S ST. TOTAL: 21 6700 SW 58 . 5995 SW 72 ST. 6845 SW 59 PL. 6161 SW 72 ST.. 0 PG. 12 VEHICLE BURGLARIES CASE n ADDRESS CA E ADDRESS 43 5795 SW 72 ST. 7092 5872 SW 72 ST.-' 76 6600 ELK SW 57 AV. 8135 6510`SW 57 CT. 168 68 ST. SW 57 AV. 8445 6075 SW 72 -ST. 180 64 ST: SW 62 AV. 8953 64�' °ST. SW 61 AV. 19B 68 ST. SW 59 AV. 9508 5838 SW 68 ST'. 383 64 ST. SW 62 AV., 9527 5858 S. DIXIE HY. 504 70 ST. S. DIXIE HY. 9595 6620`SW 57 AV.' 1224 6845 SW 59 PL. 9801 5814 S. DIXIEHY. 1394 70 . ST. SW 62 AV. 10168 .72 ST. SW 62 AV. = 1575 5925 SW 69 ST. 1955 5815'SW 68 ST.. 2207 5857 COMMERCE LN. TOTAL: - 58; 2341 5981 SW 72 ST. 2344 5981 SW 72 ST. 2683 5701 SW 72 ST. 2934 5820 COMMERCE LN. 2935 5820 COMMERCE LN. 2986 5927 SW 70 ST. 3364 6525 SW 57 CT. 3522 69 ST. SW 58 PL. 3543 6400 SW 62 AV: 3656 6100 ELK SW 63 ST. 3864 5925 SW 69 ST. 4176 6101 SW 72 ST.� 4184 5849 SW 72 ST. 4773 6125 SW 63 ST. 4967 5851 SW 72 ST. 5004 6601 SW 62 AV. 5013 6600 SW 57 AV. 5090 5825 SW 68 ST. 5139' 5701 SW 72 ST. 5323 '66 ST. 'SW 57 AV.. 5729 6545 SW 57 CT. 5768 6500 ELK SW 57 CT. 5785 72 ST. SW 59 AV. ". 5857 6620 SW 57 AV. 5900 7200 ELK SW 57 CT. 5964 5701 SW 72 ST. 6110 5701 SW 72 ST. 6157 66 ST. SW 57 CT. 6237 5949 SW 72 ST. 6257 .7080 SW 59 PL. 6516 6139 SW 69 ST. 6713. 5949 SW 72 ST. 6739 6600 SW 57 AV. 6744 6201 SW 70 ST. 6818 5885 SW 68 ST. 6975 5924 SW 68 ST. PG. 13 ARMED ROBBERIES CASES ADDRESS 1535 ', 6620 SW 67 ST.. 1570 64 ST. SW 59 AV. 1933 68, ST. TOTAL: 19 STRONG ARM ROBBERIE CASE # ADDRESS 1314 b. PL. 3310 , 6790 SW 57 AV,.,, 3338,`, 68 ST. SW 59.PL. 3474. .5949- 72 ST.; 3,692 6600, SW 57 AV. ' 4495--'- ::6829, SW 59 'PL`.: 4680 ;.6420.'SW 62 AV,.; 4584 64 ST. SW 57 CT. 5053 64 TE. SW 60; AV. 6055 6140 SW 70 ST. 6158 66 ST. SW 57 CT. 6159 66 ST." SW; 57 ,CT. 6271 68 ST. SW 59 PL. 6310 5950 SW 68 ST. 6364 69 ST. SW 58 PL. 6772 69 ST. SW 58 PL. 8457- 5959 SW 71 ST. TOTAL: 19 STRONG ARM ROBBERIE CASE # ADDRESS 1314 5900 ELK SW 67 ST. 3294 5852 SW 72 ST. 4071 6100 SW_ 68 CT. 4159 - 66 ST. SW 59 PL. 4188 67 ST. SW 59 PL. 4723 6.900 SW 59 PL. 5652 6400 ELK SW 62 AV. 5692 68 ST. SW 58 PL. 6328 6100 ELK SW 62 TE. 6492 5950 SW 68 ST. 6582 6500 ELK SW 59 PL. 7113 64 ST. SW 59 PL. 7528 6601 SW 62 AV. 8396 64 ST. SW 57 AV. 8541 6790 SW 57 AV. 8662 5950 SW 68 ST. 8869 5801 SW 72 ST. 10064 69 ST. SW 61 AV. 10174 6851 SW 59 PL. _ ".. TOTAL: 19 0 10 ( 0 D -ne Six ding & Lot List 58 5900 S.W. 62nd Street - showing major deterioration: Undergoing repair.. Substandard E 3K 2 69. 5920 S.W. 62nd Street - showing major deterioration: Substandard. BLOCK 2 70. 5930 S.W. 62nd Street - showin minor deterioration:, Substandard. BLOCK 2 9' , 71. 5954 S. W. 62nd Street - Vacant lot: Substandard. BLOCK 2 72. 5901 S.W. 62nd Terrace - showing major deterioration, overgrown w/ weeds and debris outside, etc.: Substandard. BLOCK 8 73. 5931, 5908,, 5917 -19, 5927 S.W. 64th Street - Minor deterioration of residential. buildings.. Vacant lot @ S.W. 64th Street & S.W. 59th Ave.: Substandard.- BLOCK 15 . 74. 5935 S.W. 59th PL at S.W. 64th Street - Vacant lot: Substandard.." BLOCK 15 75. Entire blocks bordering the backside (south) of S.W. 62nd Street between SW: 59 PL and S.W. 62nd to Hardee Drive S.W.. 64th Street.: All lots will have a lot configuration constraint, less than the squired 6,000''SF fora residential lot: Substandard. Includes BLOCKS 3,4,5,6,7,8,9:12,13,14,15, & 16. 6253 755 S.W. 60th Ave. -vacant. lot w/ overgrown weeds: Substandard. BLOCK 7 6273 S.W. 60th Ave.- showing major. deterioration: Dilapidated:; BLOCK 7- 78. 6301, 6317, 6319, 6333, 6335, 6351 6353, 6365, 6367, 5985, 5981, 5991 S.W. 60th Ave. showing major deterioration and lot constraints: Dilapidated. BLOCK 14 79. 6300, 6316, 6332, 6350, 6364, 6372, 6380 S.W. 59th PL - showing major deterioration and lot con straints: Substandard. ' BLOCK -14 80. 6067 S.W. 62nd Terrace - showing major deterioration and lot constraints:'Dilapidated: ' BLOCK 4 81: 6M1,',6'0'1'7 S.W. '62nd Terrace :7 showing. major deterioration and lot constraints 'Dilapidated. Substandard. BLOCK 4 May 1996 3e Seven gilding & Lot List L 6017 S.W. 62nd Terrace,-,. Major detenroation with attached vacant.lot that is overgrown with wW' .0 id debris: Dilapidated. BLOCK 4 3. 6082, 6066 S.W. 62nd Terrace - showing major deterioration and lot. constraints:,Substandard LOCK 5 9 major Substandard LOCK 6 4...6080; 6016 S.W. .62nd .Terrace - showin ma or deterioration and lot constraints: 5- 6250. S.W. 62nd Terrace - Vacant lot w/ „overgrown weeds: Substandard. BLOCK 6 ” ;6. 6051, 6041, 6017 S.W. 63rd Street - showing major date noration.and lot constraints Substandard, ' ubstandard, Dilapidated. BLOCKS 5A 6 17.1 S.W: 63rd Street - .Vacant, lot,, lot constraint and site deterioration: Substandard. BLOCK 6" .. ;;`6090 dilapidated;, 6082, & 6074 vacant;- 6066 major deterioration, 6040 dilapidated,.,6016 dilapidated, .16 -6300 S.W. 63rd Street - showing major deterioration'and lot constraints : - ::Dilapidated. BLOCKS 12 & 13. 39. 6085,Z053-55,-6039 dilapidated, 6017 -25 S.W. 63rd Terr. -showing major deterioration and lot CC straints: Substandard, Substandard, Dilapidated; Substandard, -Substandard BLOCK 13'. 90. 6348, 6340, 6332, 6350 S.W. 60th Ave. All dilapidated and showing major,detenoration and lot con - straints Dilapidated.. BLOCK.1 3 91. 6083, 6058, & 6051 - Church, 6039, 6017, & 6001 are vacant lots next to church on S.W. 64th Street - 9_ m no showing inor deteration and. lot constraints: Substandard. BLOCK 16 92. 6179 vacant, .6165 major deterioration, 6143, 6133, 6117, & 6109 are all minor deterioration on S.W. 62nd Terrace - showing major /minor deterioration and lot constraints; Dilapidated( major 6165): BLOCK 3 Substandard (4). 93. 6170 minor deterioration, 6116 major deterioration, 6100 S.W. 62nd Terrace - showing both major and minor deterioration and lot constraints: Dilapidated., BLOCK 5 6165, 6125 S.W. 63rd Street showing minor deterioration and lot constraints: Substandard. _OCK 5 95. 6198, 6150 -6152, 6140, 6132, 6124, 6116, 6108, 6100 S.W. 63rd Street showing major deterioration and lot constraints: Dilapidated. BLOCK 12 F- e Eight L.-,.ding & Lot List 6345 vacant, 6163, 6151, 6133, 6125, 6117, 6101, & 6109 are dilapidated on S.W. 63rd Terrace - s,,,- ;,ring major deterioration and lot constraints: Dilapidated (6), Substandard (1).BLOCK 12 97. 6167 & 6165 are vacant, 6157, 6141, 6117 S.W. 64th Street- showing minor deterioration and lot constraints. BLOCK 16 98. 5931 -33, 5927, 5917 -19, 5911, 5901 S.W. 62nd Terrace -major deteriora'bon"and lot constraints: Substandard. BLOCK 8 99: 5932, 5926, 5918, 5910 -12; 5900 -02 S.W. 62nd Terrace -minor deterioration and lot constraints: Substandard. BLOCK 9 100. 5929, 5925 -27, 5917, 5909 -11, 5901 S.W. 63rd Street- minor'deterioration and lot constraints: Substandard. BLOCK 9 101. 5932 -34, 5928, 5918, 5912, 5900 S.W. 63rd. Street -minor deterioration.. Substandard. BLOCK 15 '()9. 6260 S.W.58th PL- vacant, site deterioration. { _ BLOCK 11 103. 6091, 60811 6049 S.W. 64th Terrace -major deterioration: Substandard. 6065 S.W. 64th Terrace - vacant land with site deterioration Substandard 6041 S.W. 64th Terrace -minor deterioration. BLOCK 18 104. 6488, 6500, 6518, 6580 S.W.60th Ave. -minor deterioration adjacent to vacant land. BLOCK 19 105. 6429, 6443, 6457, 6487, 6501 S.W. 60th Ave. -all major deterioration. ' Substandard. BLOCK 20 May. 1996 PG. 14 ATTTO THEFT TOTAL:'.28• - - 0 , CAE ADDRESS 4 658 5957 SW 69 ST. 1071 6325 SW S9 AV. 1180 5701- SW 72, ST:. 1353 6100 ELK S,W 68'TE. 1895 5730 SW 72 ST. 2211 5701 SW 72 ST. 2689 ; .:: 5949 �SW ;`72 ST.: 2783 5701 SW 72 ST. 3138 6601 SW 62 AV. 3235.,. 6600 .SW.. 57 AV, „ 3398 " -6011 SW' 69 ST.. 3948 6620 SW 57 AV. 3981 5700 ELK SW 72 ST. 263 ; . 6000 ELK. ,SW','12 ST 4713 5701 SW 72 ST. 4940 7031 SW 62 AV. 5475 6600' ELK SW 57 CT, _ 5753 6075 SW 72 ST. 6014 5801 S. DIXIE HY. 6038 5949 .SW:-72: ST.: 6403 6081. _ SW. 64 ,:TE . _ 6462 5949 SW 72' ST. 8156 72 ST. SW 58 AV. O 8632 5783 COMMERCE LN. ..:8840 6511- SW 57 PL. 8922 6500 SW 57 CT. 9244 ;• ..5969 SW,69 ,ST. .,.. 9943 5949 SW 72 ST, ' TOTAL:'.28• - - 0 PG. 15 THEFTS :. CASE ADDRESS .. _. 472 5876 SW 67 ST. 1034 -6316 SW 59 PL. 1315 6441 SW 58 AV. 1443 6525 SW 57 CT. 1586 6525 SW 57 CT. 1803 5828 SW -71 ST. 2518 5750 SW 72 ST. _ 2860 5795 SW 72 ST. ' 3050 66 ST. SW 59 PL. 3331 7021 SW 62 AV. 3377. 5750 SW 72 ST, 3583 5864 COMMERCE LN. 4024 6345 SW 59 AV. 4191 72 ST. S. DIXIE Hy. 4405 6101 SW 72 ST. 5520 5995 SW 72 ST. 6775 68 ST. SW 61 CT. 8631 5783 COMMERCE LN. 9273 5896 SW 66 ST. 9276 6170 SW 62 TE. 9578 5781'COMMERCE LN. 9687 5701 SW 72 ST. 9918 5701 SW 72 ST. TOTAL: 23 HOMICIDES CASE # -ADDRESS _ 7715 64 ST. SW 59 PL. TOTAL: I 1 SEXUAL OFFENSES CASSE# ADDRESS 5521 5701 SW 72 ST. 6624 6100 BLK SW 70 ST. 8140 6700 BLK SW 61 CT. TOTAL: 3 PG. 16 AGGRAVATED.BATTERIES Tr1R•1 T � to CASE # ADDRESS 209. 68 ST. SW 61 CT. �. 570 6172 SW 68 ST. 1311 6100 BLK SW.68 ST. 1760 6800 BLK SW 58 PL. 2069 69 ST. SW 62 AV. 3743 6000 BLK SW 64 ST. 5246B 5907 SW 68 ST. 5820 6429 SW 60 AV. 5987 64 ST. SW 60 AV. 6049 6700 SW 62 CT. 6339 63 ST. SW 60 AV. 6341 6300 BLK SW.•60 AV. 6356 6038 -SW 63 ST. 6703 6305 SW 59 AV. 7500 6066 SW 62 TE. 8052 612.4 SW 63 ST. 8458 6166 SW 68 ST. 9990 6400 SW 59 PL. 10095 69 ST. SW 57 PL. - 10327 6039 SW 63 TE. TOTAL: 20 AGGRAVATED ASSAULTS (0 CASE n ADDRESS 246, 68 ST. SW 61 CT. 669 5950 SW 68 ST. 902 6124 SW 64 TE. 1936 6 8 ST.-SW 58 PL. 2707 5889 SW 72 ST. 5206 5701 SW 72 ST. 6187 6441 SW 58 AV. 6921 5986 SW 66 ST. 6973 6400 BLK SW 59 PL. 7853 6425 SW 57 CT. 8090 5896 SW 66 ST. 10036 7080 SW 59 PL. TOTAL: 12 ARSONS CASE # ADDRESS 5934 6000 BLK,.SW 66 TE. Tr1R•1 T � DING AND VACANT LOT LI51 rage i :VIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT ' "'�j j43S.W.60th Ave. - sho how" 6' j 1. , dation, and: has ' � concrete locks oun win ma or deterioration, house�on co b Structural problems: Dilapidated. BLOCK 20 _. Ave. - showing major deterioration, house is a,wood frame o s � 6457 S.W. 60th Ave n concrete block, and has .10 foundation: Dilapidated., BLOCK 20 3. 6487 S.W. 60th Ave. - showing major deterioration (no foundation, sitting on concrete' block, window frames deteriorated, roof in deteriorated condition): Dilapidated. BLOCK 20 4. 6501 S.W. 60th Ave. - showing major deterioration (foundation cracked /deteriorated needing roof repair.., siding deteriorated): Dilapidated. BLOCK 20 5. 6580 S.W. 60th Ave. - vacant lots w/ debris and overgrown trees, hazardous materials: Substandard., BLOCK 19 6 6016 S.W. 66th Street - shot gun house w/ no expandable property opportunities : "Has been demo I -''` ;d. BLOCK 30 �. 5974 S.W. 66th Street - showing major deterioration ( structural deficiencies, no foundation, sitting on (concrete block): Substandard. Dilapidated. BLOCK 30 3601 S.W. 59th Place acant lot adjoining two ;lots:on S.E. 59th PI & 660 Street, commercial property. Weeds overgrown and hazardous debris. 6600 S.W. 66th St. - commercial store w/ vacant, 'iand: Substandard. BLOCK 31 9.i 6501 S.W. 59th Ct. = vacant lot that takes up 1/2 of block; overgrown weedsAnd old'.fencing (deteriorat- ed): Substandard. BLOCK 22 10. 5845 S.W. 68th Street - Coker Plumbing, dilapidated bldg. to.be purchased,by the city;for use as extension .of, Murray Park: Dilapidated. BLOCK 33 11,. 6731 S.W. 58th Place - 'vacant land w/ overgrown weeds, N. E. corner of 58th Place & 68th Street, to be purchased by the city to be used as extension of Murray Park: Substandard. BLOCK 33 12. 5818 S.W. 68th Street - Executive Coach Works Bod Paint & ( y Shop), deteriorating fencing, debris and hazardous materials: Substandard. BLOCK 37 May 1996 ,e Two Iding & Lot List 5846 S.W. 68th Street Tr ' ansmission Company, presents a land use .questions given the surroundir'� ismg and commercial uses: Substandard. BLOCK 37 .5858 S.W. 68th Street - Warehouse on corner minor deterioration: Substandard. BLOCK 37 5872, 5876,'5896, 5906 S. W. 68th Street Vacant lot for sale by Caldwell Bankers: 'S'ubsta'ndard.: OCK 36 . . . 5920 S.W. 68th Street - Dilapidated budding wl boarded up windows and doors. Substandard. .00K 36 6049 S.W. 64th Terrace -small shotgun house, on the ground w / se" ptic tank in yard: Dilapidated. .00K 19 I. 6065 S.W. 64th Terrace - Vacant lot, 4,000 S.F., too small for current 6,000 S.F. requirement to build -a )using unit: ibstandard. BLOCK 19 6081 S.W. 64th Terrace- •showing major. deterioration, .wooden structure on ground, shotgun: ilapidated. BLOCK 19 g j ry, ; structure on concrete. b 6091 `S.W. 64th Terrace - showin major deterioration, ve small struct lock: ubstandard.:BLOCK 19 1. Vacant lot on east side of S.W. 61 st Ct. from S.W. 64th Terrace to 66th Street going south. - Adjoins roperty on S W: 60th Avenue,` 6488; 6500; 6518, and..6580.S.W. 60th Avenue: Substandard. BLOCK 19 2. 5889 & 5895 S.W. 67th Street -showing major deterioration, wooden fence deteriorated w/ unsafe bro- en cars parked' in adjacenflot Dilapidated: , BLOCK' 31.. . 1 6009 S.W. 66th Terrace - showing major deterioration, small wooden structure on the'ground: ) ilapidated BLOCK,30 A. 6025 S.W. 66th Terrace - showing major deterioration, shotgun house on the ground: Dilapidated.' 3LOCK 30 15.. 6401 S.W. 64th Street and 6411 & 6415 S.W. 59th PL, S.E. of Harde side e Dr. & S.W. 59th PL is - ' ,acant lot, overgrown grass, tires and other debris: Substandard. BLOCK 21. 6412, 6420, 6428 S.W. 59 PL - Vacant lot: Substandard. NR District. BLOCK 20 0 May 1996 :,-,e Three ..ling & Lot List -) S.W. 59th PL showing minor deterioration, could be overcrowded: Substandard I - NR District. Bl OK 20 , 28. 6429 S.W. 59th PL- showing major deterioration,,concrete'block building,. four, units needing repair, . overcrowded: Substandard - NR. District. BLOCK 21 29. 6450 & 6452 S.W. 59th PL.- .showing minor deterioration, two units wl potential overcrowded: Substandard - NR District. BLOCK 20 30. 6501 S.W. 59th Ct. - showing major deterioration, house w/ structural problems and attached land.for potential development: Substandard.: BLOCK 22 31. , 6401 S.W. 59th Avenue at 64th Street - sho'Wing minor deterioration, very small structure, potential overcrowded: Substandard. BLOCK 23 32, 6421 S.W. 59th Avenue, -. , showing major deterioration; 'very' poor condition- awnings, roof & structure, dilapidated: Substandard. BLOCK 23 S.W. 59th Avenue from 64th Street to 66th "Street on the west side -Vacant-lots, lot configuration con - aints - size and shape: Substandard. BLOCK 23 �.. D 6540 S.W. 58th PL at 58th PL - showing majordeterioration, fence .needs to be replaced,:windows &. nngs falling off house, structure in need of major repair. Dilapidated.: Substandard: BLOCK 23 35. 6520 S.W. 58th PL - showing major deterioration, structural problems, roof & awning: Substandard:- BLOCK 23 36. 6501 S.W. 58th PL - showing minor deterioration: Substandard. BLOCK 24 37. 6441 S.W. 58th PL - showing minor deterioration: Substandard. BLOCK 24 38, 6431 S.W. 58th PL - showing minor deterioration, windows &: doors: Substandard.- BLOCK'24 39. 6541 S'.* W. 58th Avenue - showing minor deterioration, roof & awnings: Substandard. BLOCK 25 May 1996 ,e four Iding & Lot list . 6530 S.W. 57th PL - showing minor deterioration,' roof &' gutters:' Substandard.: BLOCK 25;1 0 6411 S.W: 57th PLC- .showing-mmor deterioration, roof & studs : Substandard. BLOCK 26 !. 6400 S.W. 57th Ct. - Vacant lot w /overgrown weeds, dilapidated fencer Substandard.. BLOCK 26 3. 6410 S.W. 57th Ct. - showing minor deterioration 'Substandard. BLOCK 26 . f. 6440 S.W.' 57th Ct._- .showing, minor, deterioration: Substandard BLOCK 26 5. 5982, 5986; 5990, 6004, 6010 S.W. 69th Street - Vacant lot; debris piled up.' Across from .Multi-family :)using;-,could.be:used for housing development or commercial development to compliment the needs I residents: Substandard- Medium Intensity"Office. BLOCK 42 6.,,- 6100,:6110; 6120; 6128 S.W.'-69th Street- fenced in parking lot, commercial use now. Larkins lospital owns this property, potential for better use of this cornea t: Substandard. BLOCK. 211,': 6140, 6144; 6150. BLOCK -69th.Street -- fenced in business w/ lot, question of underutilization of p rty: 1. 18. 6011; 6005; 5961: 5965 & 6940 S.W. 70th Street - Vacant lot, fenced, commercial use now, for sale: ) ubstandard. BLOCK42 �9. 5831 -5821 S.W. 70th Street - Total Auto Care, some work being done outside, overcrowding; Substandard; . BLOCK 39 50. 5801 S.W. 70th Street - Rick's Garage, some work being done outside, overcrowding: Substandard. BLOCK 40 51. 7000 S.W. 70th Street-- Vacant tot, overgrown weeds & trees, lot for sale: Substandard. BLOCK 45 52. 5996 S.W. 70th .Street -.,for sale,. professional office building, declining property value- question: Substandard. BLOCK 46 53. 7001 S.W. 61st Ave. - showing minor deterioration, vacant building, need repair:, Substandard.- BLOCK 46' May 1996 ge Five Building & Lot List O 54. , 5879 S.W. Commerce Lane- Auto Repair Shop, some work being done outside, overcrowding: Substandard. BLOCK 38 55, 5800 S.W. Commerce Lane Dave's Car Clinic, showing minor deterioration: Substandard. BLOCK 39 56. 5795 S.W. Commerce Lane - TSA Motors, Inc, cars parked in lot and work being done outside, over- crowding: Substandard. BLOCK 38 57. 5885 Commerce Lane- Aaction Transmission, cars in lot, work being done outside, overcrowding: Substandard. BLOCK 38 58. 5897 S.W. 69th Street Several cars in lot, work outside, overcrowding: Substandard. BLOCK 36 59. 5890 S.W. 69th St. - Abandoned structure next to Post Office - Needs"to be.demoiished: Substandard )CK 43 60. 6141 S.W. 61st Ct. at Sunset Dr. - Vacant lot w/ overgrown weeds and fence deterioration: -'-�b standard. BLOCK 45 61. 1109 S.W. 61st Ct. - showing major deterioration, old housing structure, needs to be demolished, in use: next to commercial buildings. Dilapidated: Substandard.. BLOCK 45 62. 7019 S.W. 61 st Ave. - showing minor deterioration, old villas for sale, next to commerciallprofessiona: office buildings, question of underutilization of property: Substandard. BLOCK 46 63. 7110 S.W. 61 st Ave: 7Vacant lot w/ overgrown weeds, commercial use, property value: Substandard. BLOCK 45 64. 5995 S.W. 71 st Street Medical Center next to Vacant lot at corner, can be developed w/ other vacarn properties on 70th Street, property value may decline without development: Substandard. BLOCK 46 65. 5959 S.W. 71 st Street - Singles Lounge, for sale, develop for commercial use, property value may decline without development: Substandard. BLOCK 46 66. 6260 S.W. 58 PL - Two vacant lots: Substandard. BLOCK 11 . 5900 -5902 S.W. 62nd Terrace - showing minor deterioration: Substandard. BLOCK 9 May 1996 'qe Six ding & Lot t_ist 5900 S.W. 62nd Street - showing major deterioration: Undergoing repair... Substandard 'C 2 5920 S.W. 62nd Street - showing major deterioration: Substandard. BLOCK 2 �. 5930 S.W. 62nd Street'- showing minor deterioration:. Substandard. BLOCK 2.. I. 5954 S. W. 62nd Street - Vacant lot: Substandard. BLOCK 2 ?. 5901 S.W. 62nd Terrace - showing major deterioration, overgrown w /weeds and debris'outside, etc.: ; ubstandard. BLOCK 8 3. 5931, 5908, 5917 -19, 5927 S.W. 64th Street - Minor deterioration of residential buildings.Vacant lot @ .W. 64th Street & S.W. 59th Ave.: Substandard. BLOCK 15. 4. 5935 S.W. 59th PL at S.W. 64th Street - Vacant lot: Substandard. BLOCK 15' 5. Entire blocks bordering the backside (south) of S.W. 62nd Street between S.W. 59'PLand S.W 62nd .' i.!to Hardee Drive S.W. 64th Street. All lots will have a lot configuration constraint, less than the ,quired 6,000 SF for a residential lot:.Substandard. Includes BLOCKS 3 ,4,5,6,7,8,9.12,13,1.4,15, & 1A .�. 6253 -55 S.W. 60th Ave. vacant lot w/ overgrown weeds.,'. Substandard. BLOCK 7 *'14-273 S.W. 60th Ave.= showing, major: deterioration: Dilapidated. BLOCK 7 1 ✓6301. 6317; 6319. 6333_6335.,6351.; 6353,, 6365. 6367. 5985. .9981.. 5991 S.W. 60th Ave. -. showing zalordeterioration and lot constraints: Dilapidated. BLOCK 14' 9. 6300, 6316,6332, 6350, 6364, 6372.6380 S.W.59th.PL - showing'major deterioration and lot con - traints: Substandard. BLOCK -14 0. 6067 S.W. 62nd Terrace - showing major deterioration and lot constraints: Dilapidated. BLOCK 4 1. 6031, 6017 S.W. 62nd Terrace - showing major deterioration and lot constraints: Dilapidated. •ubstandard. BLOCK 4 May 1996 ng a Lvx ust .,345 vacant,, 6163, 6151,, 6133, 6125. 6117_ , 6101, & 6109 are dilapidated on S.W. 63rd Terrace - ing major deterioration'and lot constraints: ' Dilapidated (6),� Substandard: (1).BLIOCK 12: 1167 & 6165 are vacant, 6157, 6141, 6117 S:W 64th Street - showing minor deterioration and lot :rants. BLOCK 16 , 1931 -33, 5927, 5917 -19, 5911, 5901' S.W. 62nd,Terrace- major, deterioration and lot constraints: tandard. BLOCK 8 1932. 5926.'5918,,5910-12, 5900 -02 S.W. 62nd Terrace -minor deterioration and lot constraints: tandard: BLOCK 9 5929, 5925-27,5917. 5909 -11, 5901 S.W. 63rd Street -minor deterioration and lot constraints: iandard: BLOCK 5932 -34, 5928, 5918, 5912, 5900 S.W. 63rd. Street- minor deterioration. Substandard. BLOCK 15 5260 S.W.58th.PL- vacant, site deterioration. BLOCK I1. . 6091, 6081, 6049 S.W. `64th Terrace -major deterioration: Substandard. 6065 S.W. 64th.Terrace- vacant land with site deterioration: Substandard 6041 S.W. 64th Terrace -minor deterioration.- BLOCK18 6488:6506,6518. 6580 S.W.60th Ave: -minor deterioration adjacent! to vacant land BLOCK,` 9 5429.6443. 6457. 6487. 6501 S.W. 60th Ave -all major deterioration. Substandard:.. BLOCK *20 O T • v,• 416, $c Lot List . ?. 6017 S.W. 62nd Terrace Major detedroation with attached vacant lot that is overgrown with weeds id debris: Dilapidated. BLOCK 4 4 l 3� ";° ;82, 6056 S.W. 62nd Terrace showing major deterioration and lot constraints: Substandard. �OCK 5 4. 6080. 6016 S.W. 62nd Terrace - showing* major deterioration and lot constraints: Substandard.'. ' LOCK 6 S. 6250 S.W. 62nd Terrace- Vacant lot w/ overgrown weeds: Substandard. BLOCK 6 5. 6051. 6041. 6017 S.W. 63rd Street - showino major deterioration and lot constraints: Substanoard. ubstandard. Dilapidated. BLOCKS 5 & 6 7. 6290 S.W. 63rd Street - Vacant lot, lot constraint and site deterioration: Substandard. BLOCK 6 6090 dilapidated. 6082 & 6074 - vacant, 6066 major deterioration, 6040 dilapidated, 6016 dilapidated. 117 300 S.W. 63rd Street - showing major deterioration and lot constraints: Dilapidated. :LLa -� S 1 6085: 6053 -55" 6039 dilapidated. 6017 -25 S.W. 63rd Tern' - s'howing' major deterioration and lot con traints: Substandard .'Substandard,'Dilapidated. Substandard"SObstandard.' LOCK 13. major deterioration and lot con ►rte .s: Dilapidated. BLOCK 13 C'.34B.-6340., 6332. 6350 S.W 60th Ave: °- ,�Il dilapidated and showing P . I. 6083. 6059, & 6051 - Church, 6039, 6017, & 6001 are vacant lots next to church on S.W. 64th Street - -iowing minor deterioration and lot constraints: Substandard. ' BLOCK `16 2: • 6179 vacant, 6165 major deterioration, 6143, 6133. 6117, & 6109 are all minor deterioration on S.W. 2nd Terrace, - showing major /minor deterioration and lot constraints`. Dilapidated( major 6165}: BLACK 3 ubstandard (4). 3. 170 minor deterioration. 6.116 major deterioration, 6100 S.W. 62nd Terrace'-' showing both major and anor deterioration and -lot constraints: Dilapidated. BLOCK 5 6165, 6125 S.W. 63rd Street showing minor deterioration and lot constraints: Substandard. 6198.-6150-6152. 6140. 6132. 6124, 6116, 6108. 6100 S.W. 63rd Street -showing major. deterioration 10 lot constraints: Dilapidated. , BLOCK 12 3r 11c." & Lot List . � teriroation with attached vacant tot that �s overgrown with weeds 6017 S.W. 62nd Terrace - Major de .,. d debris: Dilapidated. 'BLOCK 4 - showing major deterioration and lot constraints: Substandard. 6082, 6066 S.W .62nd Terrace ;. •. st , OCK 5 6080. 6016 S.W. 62nd Terrace - showing major deterioration and lot constraints: Substandard.— OCK 6 6250 S.W. 62nd Terrace - Vacant lot w/ overgrown weeds: Substanda g rd. BLOCK 6 S.W. 3rd Street - showing :. . 605i. 6041. 6017 . 6 „ major deterioration and tot constraints: Substandard. bstandard. Dilapidated:: BLOCKS 5 & 6:: 6290 63rd Street - Vacant lot, constraint and site deterioration: . rioration: Substandard. BLOCK16 • _. S.W. , , 6090.dilapldated.;6082 &:,6074.-,vacant. 6066.major deterioration,,, 6040: dilapidated, 6016 dilapidated, "�00 S.W. 63rd Street - showing major; deterioration and,,lot constraints. flilapidated 1,z�,,S 12 & 13. 6085..6053.55, 6039 dilapidated.; 6017 -25 S.W. 63rd Terr..- showing major deterioration and lot con - aints: Substandard.•Substandard, Dilapidated. Substandard, Substandard. OCK 13. 6348. 6340, 6332. 6350 S.W 60th Ave -.'.All: dilapidated and showing maior- deterioration and lot con -. amts: Dilapidated. BLOCK 13 6083, 6059,, & 6051 -Church,: 6039, „6017, & 6001 are vacant.lots, next to church, on S.W.,64th.Street - )wing minor deterioration and lot constraints: Substandard.. BLOCK 16 6179 vacant, 6165 major deterioration; 6143.-6133,.6117, &,6109, are all minor deterioration ,on S.W.,. id Terrace -'showing major /minor deterioration and, lot constraints: Dilapidated( major 6165)':;BLOCK 3 bstandard (4). 6170 minor deterioration. 6116 major deterioration, 6100 S.W. 62n d Terrace - showing both major and for deterioration and lot constraints: Dilapidated.. BLOCK 5 61651; 6125 S.W." 63rd Street - showi.ng minor deterioration and lot constraints: Substandard 6198.'6150-6152. 6140. 6132, 6124, 6116. 6108: 6100 S.W. 63rd Streei - showing major deterioration . lot constraints: Dilapidated. BLOCK 12 p q w w E'um"ah'EVt'ffw�L0r T P L--- N—- CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 7h e Ci! y o f �!e �r s a rr r C i v i rr Ar. . I SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN �� - jh''.��//-��'t }}d r -�1��' tr171•S S.,��a- gqe��rl�f ;d'y",�.... _•�rtP(■'�.p�`: ^'�l�+sr �Y :u'4n 4; ��A�tv►j��k�r4�1�G YJ �``li I�T��w�flti . . � �C2�.`. �k•: Srr`" L.° u. �,.+ �„ �< �i' y���. �-`' �'': � '�.��7s.�h'�s`v���i�y'��+�'! �`�i SOUTH MIAM(CITY COMMISSION Anna M. Price, Ph.D., Mayor Julio Robaina, Vice -Mayor David D., Bethel, Commissioner Armando Oliveros,..Commissioner R. Paul Young, Ed.D., Commissioner L. Dennis Whitt, City Manager Diana Morris, Assistant City Manager Earl Gallop, City Attorney .. Ronetta Taylor, City Clerk Redevelopment Plan prepared by Don Delaney SECTION 1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF REDEVELOPMENT AREA AND FINDING OF NECESSITY SECTION 2. CREATION AND POWERS OF THE SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SECTION 3. AUTHORITY TO UNDERTAKE REDEVELOPMENT SECTION 4 SAFEGUARDS AND ACCOUNTABILITY SECTION 5. AFFORDABLE HOUSING POLICY STATEMENT AND RELOCATION SECTION 11. TECHNICAL INFORMATION, MAPS AND GENERAL PLANNING STATEMENTS APPENDIX AND MAPS POLICY SECTION 6. SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA'(SMCRA) >. -: GOALS SECTION 7. REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS, PROJECTSAND STRATEGIES SECTION 8. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FINANCES AND BUDGET PROJECTIONS SECTION-9. NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACTS OF REDEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS AND PROGRAMS SECTION 10. SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PLAN AMENDMENT PROCESS SECTION 11. TECHNICAL INFORMATION, MAPS AND GENERAL PLANNING STATEMENTS APPENDIX AND MAPS C SECTION ONE GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF REDEVELOPMENT AREA AND FINDING OF NECESSITY A. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF REDEVELOPMENT AREA The South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency (SMCRA) Redevelopment Area is composed ,of approximately 189.acres containing -644 separate property folios with :a total taxable value (TTV) of approximately $73 million according to Dade County Property Appraiser's'office as of 4/11 /97. This area represents approximately 12.2 % of the overall physical area and 12 % of the TN of properties. A legal description of the redevelopment area is included in this Plan along with a map of City -owned and maintained properties. The existing land uses are primarily a mix of commercial, retail and .office, single and multi - family residential, parks, educational (JRE Lee Community School) and public /institutional uses. A copy of the current adopted land use map is included in the Plan. A map indicating the location of public schools is also included. The land use pattern follows the historic development of the area and the requirements of existing and past zoning. There are no Dade County enclaves in the redevelopment area. US Highway One, Red Road and Sunset Drive are the major traffic corridors and are bordered by retail, office and other commercial uses. ' Traffic South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan �� page 1 COMMUNM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION Beginning at a point, said point being the southeast corner of Section 25, Township 54 South, Range 40 East and being the intersection of the centerline of Southwest 57 Avenue (Red Road) and the centerline of Southwest 72 Street (Sunset Drive); thence running, westerly along the south line of the aforesaid Section 25, said line being the centerline of Southwest 72 Street (Sunset Drive), a distance of 2,640 feet, more or less, to the intersection of *the centerline Southwest 72. Street'(Sunset Drive) and the centerline of Southwest 62 Avenue. (Paul Tevis Road), the same being the southwest comer of the southeast quarter, of said Section 25;-thence, running northerly along the west line of the southeast quarter, the same being the centerline of. . Southwest 62 Avenue (Paul Tevis Road), a distance of • 3,463 -feet, more.: or , less;' to the " "; intersection of the centerline of Southwest 62 Avenue (Paul Tevis Road) and a line,-the same.`,;.'.; being the western extension of the northern right -of -way line of Southwest 62 Street; :thence running easterly along said line, and continuing. along the -'northern ;. right -of -way line of. th 62 S d' f 1362 f 1 t th ' t ti Vu rth Sou west treet, a istance o eet, more or ess, o:.. e m ersec on o e no ern.. .._. right-of-way line of Southwest 62 Street and the eastern right -of -way line of Southwest 59 Avenue, thence nmmug southerly along the eastern nght -of- -way line of Southwest 59 Avenue, a distance of 159 feet, more or less, . to the intersection of the eastern right -of -way line of Southwest 59 Avenue and a line, the same being the western extension of the north line of Lots A, B, C and D of Block 1, University Gardens No. 1 Subdivision,- A Re Plat of Block 2, . according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 91 at Page 36 in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; thence running easterly along the north line of said Lots A, B, C, and D, a: distance of 309 feet, more or less, to the northeast comer of said Lot A, the same being 'the northeast corner of University Gardens No. l Subdivision; thence southerly along the eastern line of University Gardens No. l Subdivision, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 89 at -Page 15 in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, a distance of 662.i feet, more or less, to the southeast corner of University Gardens No.1 Subdivision, the same being a point in the centerline of Southwest 64 Street (Hardee. Drive); thence ruining easterly along the centerline of Southwest 64 Street (Hardee Drive), the same being the north line of the south half of said Section '25, a distance of 990 feet, more or less, to the intersection of the centerline of Southwest 64 Street (Hardee Drive) and the centerline of Southwest 57 Avenue (Red Road), the same being the northeast comer of the southeast quarter of said - Section 25; thence running southerly along the centerline of Southwest 57 Avenue (Red Road), a distance of 2,640 feet, more or less, to the intersection of the centerline of Southwest 57 Avenue (Red Road) and the centerline of Southwest 72 Street (Sunset Drive), the same being the ,southeast comer of said Section 25, Township 54 South, Range 40 East, said point being the Point of Beginning, which area comprises approximately 185 acres. 4- Revised Fehmary 26 1997, Final Vereinn with Acreawe South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan �� page 1 A Cki W 2 b Marshall Williamson Park 4 ►fter School House 125 SW 68 Street The tax records indicate )roperty is HUD owned) S.W. 62nd STREET S.W. 7ln• STRICT' .City -Owned Properties in the Proposed CRA 1S{N�13�12�11�10121rr•11Tl* NORTH Not to Scale South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan ,�� page 1 6 W ' I E Lee Murray Park ' 6701 SW 58 Place p E Fire'Well ;. • :.:.:. '' 68 Street Inspection' Station`:.. s.` X5890 SW 59,Street Q-t ,;'r .3 ; 31 • 22 ! 2, • !1 4 37 10 ST. ` R • 35 12 .. ' = v 17 7 x a v +• Municipal Parking Lot 41 1 Ill. 58th Ave / 71st Street S.W. 7ln• STRICT' .City -Owned Properties in the Proposed CRA 1S{N�13�12�11�10121rr•11Tl* NORTH Not to Scale South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan ,�� page 1 6 EM In am 1313 10313 MEN DD Lam® EEMM EBNER Bn + '` v:} •`K, �. }, .a ! r,1•� f� � ' .� fit, �1 E3 Imin am Im mums MEMO OEM Im a all -l- -,I In 4 TO try it INN, ii 1995 FUTURE LAM) USE MAP FOR THE PROPOSED CR LEGEN D O Single- Family Residential (Two - Story) Multiple - Family Residential (Four- Story) In Mixed-Use.Commercial/ResidentiaI (Four - Story) II Transit- Oriented Development District (4 +4- Story) Ea Educational Uses (Four - Story) Public_ I astitutional-Uses- (Four - Story) 11 Parks and Open Space. (including School Board) , South Miami Community Redevelopment Plana ® page 1 D issues were addressed in 1982 and 1994 as a' part.of a Development of Regional Impact Development Order application for the Bakery Center and the Shops at Sunset sites respectively. The advent of the MetroRail stop at the South.Miami station has assisted in traffic calming, and the adoption of the Transit Oriented Development ordinance by the City Commission in 1997 may further relieve traffic pressures. The Community Redevelopment Area includes approximately 98% of the original Dade County South Miami Target Area as created by the County's Office of Community Development. A-map of the County- designated-target area is included.with a delineation of the South Miami Community Redevelopment Area overlaying the original boundaries for comparative . purposes. The residential area is primarily a minority community which consists of comparatively lower income residents with .a higher poverty rate as compared to the balance of Dade County. A distressing statistic shows ,that the poverty level for individuals in this area has risen from 37% in .1985 to 38% in 1990. This is a trend that must be reversed. The poverty level for families has risen even more dramatically from ,34% to 37% over the same time period. According to data in the Dade County Office of Community Development report, which is incorporated into the City's Evaluation and Appraisal Report, approximately 85% of the population is native -born; households in this area are more likely to rent than own their homes. Crowding is a significant problem, especially in rental. households. The value of- housing, both mean home value and rent is below that of Dade County. Only about .17% of the children in South Miami lived in married- couple households in 1990. More than two in five lived with a single parent, and about 70% of the households with children were headed by a South Miami Community Redevelopment Plante page 2 AiM SW 62 ST SW 64 ST W O 3 w SW es ST sw 71 ST - SW 72 .ST I=Hucvas oC E10 f�l Now IGM aacsr+rr .wo tzar�o� a£vsrp,�cr• '�•�.,s,ar,sa et7r[rt xcrawtaoxwoons M®®®E su b UA fa 0��110��OC10 o El RMEMMON011- 1 01 MENU= METRO TARGET AREA SOUTH. . MIAMI South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan ��, page 2 A (} single parent. South Miami CRA area residents had a lower level of educational attainment than the Dade .County. average. Workers in this area were concentrated in service and blue collar rather than professional occupations. In summary, the South Miami Community Redevelopment. Area residents face a range of serious social and economic challenges and are in need of tools to assist them in improving their future. B. FINDING OF NECESSITY As part of the creation of a Community Redevelopment Agency and the adoption process fora redevelopment plan, a resolution addressing the Finding of Necessity has Al been adopted by the South Miami City Council and the Dade County Board of Abandoned Residential Property County Commissioners. These resolutions,. in the Heart of the Redevelopment Area numbered 154 -96 -,9908 and R- 1374 -96, -were adopted on .September 3, 19.96 . and December 3, 1996 by the. City and County respectively. In addition to the statutorily required resolution, the City of South Miami commissioned the undertaking of a full field Blighted site In Need of report to verify the need for redevelopment Redevelopment Assistance in the redevelopment agency's area of operation. This report was completed in May of 1996. From April through August of 1997, the City redevelopment consultant conducted twelve field visits and South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan ..� page 3 three community walking tours and conducted additional research which validates and concurs with the City- initiated report. (1) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF FINDING OF NECESSITY Abandoned Office Building on 701h Street The establishment of a redevelopment area requires an official finding of necessity for redevelopment by the City and acceptance by Dade County. A finding of necessity for redevelopment is based on the existence of conditions found in a' community as described in Florida Statute: Community Redevelopment Act of 1969, Chapter 163, Part ill. Upon review and assessment of the study area and application of appropriate criteria set forth in the Statute, the proposed City of South Miami CRA area was found to have a combination of conditions that require a need for redevelopment. The following conditions were applicable in the study area: • Building Deterioration. A large number of structures were found to.be in either major or minor deteriorating condition. These structures are scattered throughout the study area. • Site Deterioration and Deficiencies. Site deterioration and deficiencies were prevalent in the form of broken glass, broken pavement in sfreefs and sidewalks, overgrown weeds in vacant lots and existing structures, abandoned foundations from demolished buildings, deteriorated fences, and garbage, and debris in the front yards or back alleys. South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan ,,,� page 4 C • Unsanitary Conditions. Unsanitary conditions include abandoned cars, furniture and fixtures, accumulation of trash and debris, broken glass, environmental hazards i.e.; septic tanks, grease traps at auto repair, fiberglass and painting shops. Air quality and. waste water. are concerns in some blocks. • Drainage deficiencies. Drainage deficiencies were observed during.. rainy days of the external window shield field study. Several blocks showed signs of flooding whereby.waterWas standing on the streets and sidewalks. o Diversity of Ownership. Diversity of ownership was found in several blocks. where buildings or parcels were owned by.five or more entities per block. Age of Structures. There are several blocks where the age of the structures on average. are 40 years or more. Several additional structures ranging between 30 to'39 years in age. o Property, Maintenance Code. Violations. Violation of property maintenance standards lend to substandard conditions arising in the buildings and inhibits investments in the area for redevelopment. •. Non- Conforming Structures. -Size of Units. Several blocks were, identified where the size of a unit'to its lot size did not meet the minimum code requirements. South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan o� page S • Non - Conforming Structures. Parking Requirements. Non - conforming parking arrangements were identified in blocks where off - street parking does not meet minimum code standards as-well as where. streets are too narrow for parked cars and two -way traffic. • Closed Buildings. Closed buildings indicate obsolescence and stagnant economic growth. Ten buildings were found to be closed 'or boarded up in the study area. • Vacant Lots. Vacant lots denote non = productive use of land in a community which leads to blighting conditions i.e., unsanitary conditions, breeding ground for crime, and limits the.tax revenues to the city.. Inadequate Street Layout. Several blocks have streets that are not wide enough to maintain two-way traffic flow, and several blocks do not have adequate street parking. • High Crime .Rates. Grant theft, robbery, burglary, auto theft, auto burglary, battery, homicide, and sex.offenses are prevalent in the study area. High crime rates reflect a lack of adherence to the law and public safety. This.inhibits redevelopment initiatives. Based on the facts stated in this report, the City's governing body'may reasonably request a delegation of authority from Dade County under.the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969, Chapter 163, Part III, and may make an official finding that, a redevelopment area is necessary in the'study area. A South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan �� page 6 co of the Finding of Necessity is attached as Appendix A and contains PY . 9 Y PP quantifiable data on each criteria discussed above'. (2). METHODOLOGY Study Area The initial study area was defined by Dade County.in ,1986.• Throughout this ten - year period; it has remained as •a target area for. economic and community development in the Comprehensive Plan of both, the City and Dade County. FIeld Survey The study area was reviewed and assessed by consultants and City staff during February through April of 1996. The consultant examined buildings from the ( exterior. Notations were made on a worksheet when buildings showed signs of deterioration. Three classifications were used to describe building deterioration: major deterioration, minor deterioration, or dilapidated. Public 'Records._ Other information was obtained from the City or Dade County records which included the 1990 and 1995 real property tax rolls, property and maintenance code violation .records, police crime data, City of South Miami Evaluation and . Appraisal Report, and the City of South Miami's Comprehensive Plan. These records were used to obtain data on: property and maintenance code violations, drainage deficiencies, unsanitary conditions, diversity of ownership, age of structures, non - conforming structures, vacant lots, inadequate. streets, and high crime rates in the area. South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan ® page 7 `' . Compilation of Data Data'obtained in the field and from City records and reports were assembled - into a spreadsheet format. The block by block data include the following: number of buildings /parcels per block, number and percent of buildings. showing deterioration (major and minor), presence of site deficiencies, presence of unsanitary conditions, presence of. drainage.clefickencies, diversity of ownership, average age of buildings,. number of blocks having buildings in non- r compliance with building and zoning codes (size of unit to lot, parking), number of closed buildings, vacant lots, property.and maintenance code violations, and crime rate's as reported by the Police Department. The detailed block by block data is shown in Exhibit B: Conditions Survey in the full text.of the Finding of Necessity. Criteria u• Each block was assessed as to whether it did or did not meet the criteria established relative to blighting conditions as stated in the Florida Statute Chapter 163.335. Findings and declarations of necessity and 163.340. Definitions. They are listed be 1. • Building Deterioration of 20% or More. (Standards for building deterioration are stated in the building deterioration section of this report.) 2. Presence of Site Deterioration or Deficiencies. 3. Presence of Unsanitary Conditions. 4. Drainage Deficiencies. 5. Diversity of Ownership. 6. Average Age of Structures: 40-plus years. �. 7. Property Maintenance Code.Violations. -South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan =� page 8 8. Presence of Non - Conformin Structures: Size of Unit to Lot size. 9. Presence of Non- Conforming Structures: Parking Requirements. 10. Presence of Closed. Buildings. 11. Presence of Vacant Lots. 12. Presence of Inadequate Street Layout: 13. High Crime Rates in these Categories: grant theft, robbery, burglary, auto theft, auto burglary, battery.; homicide, and sex offenses. All data is presented in detailed maps and attached to the South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan as Appendix A (Finding of Necessity) South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan A&M page 9 . SECTION TWO CREATION* AND POWERS OF THE-SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. A. CREATION Upon a Finding of Necessity, and subsequent to the adoption. of the. . required resolutions and ordinances, the City Commission of the City of South Miami may create the.South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency, hereinafter referred to as the SMCRA. Through this process it 'shall be determined that there is a need for the SMCRA to carry out community redevelopment as defined by statute and set forth in this Plan. The-SMCRA shall be -a public body corporate and politic and shall be constituted as a public instrumentality. The City Commission of the City of South Miami established the SMCRA on September 3, 1997 through the adoption of Ordinance # 154 -96 -9908. The Dade County Board of County Commissioners approved the creation of the Agency on 1998 with the adoption of Ordinance # The organizational structure of the SMCRA was also established at that time. The Board of the SMCRA shall further adopt by -laws to govern the operation of the Agency. B. -POWERS 1. To make and execute contracts and other instruments necessary or convenient'to the exercise of its powers under this Act. South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan .ir=L page 10 �✓ 2. To disseminate community redevelopment information. 3. To undertake and carry out community redevelopment and related activities within'the community redevelopment area, which redevelopment may include: (a) Acquisition, redevelopment of and disposition of real property; (b) Demolition and removal of buildings and improvements; (c) Installation, construction or reconstruction of streets, utilities, parks, playgrounds and public areas; and (d) Carrying out plans for a program of repair and rehabilitation of buildings or other improvements. 4. Within the community redevelopment area: (a) To make inspections, surveys, appraisals;•soundings' or test borings and to conduct environmental tests -and surveys; (b) To acquire.by purchase, lease, option; gift, grant, bequest, devise, eminent domain or otherwise any real property (or personal property for its administrative purposes), together with any improvements thereon; except that..the.SMCRA may not exercise any power. of eminent domain unless the exercise has been specifically approved by the City Commission; (c) To hold, improve, clear or prepare for redevelopment any such property; (d) To mortgage, pledge, hypothecate or otherwise encumber or dispose of any property; '(e) To enter into-any contracts necessary to effectuate redevelopment activities South Miami Community Redevelopment Wan A&M page T i I =yam' (f) To' solicit requests for proposals for redevelopment; (g) To borrow money and to- apply for and accept advances, loans; grants, contributions and any.other form of financial assistance from the Federal Government or the'state, county or other public body or from any sources, public or private, for the purpose of redevelopment; (h) To acquire air rights which shall be utilized for the implementation of redevelopment programs; L (i) To apply for, accept and utilize grants of funds from any . source, public or private, for redevelopment;. u) To appropriate such funds and make such expenditures as are necessary to carry out the purposes of this Plan; (k) Within its area of operation, to organize, coordinate and ' . direct the administration of redevelopment activities. 5. When authorized or approved by the City Commission of the City of South Miami and the Dade County, Board of County Commissioners, the SMCRA shall be permitted to issue redevelopment revenue bonds and other financial instruments as per Section 163.385 F:S. Bonds issued under this section do not constitute an indebtedness within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory debt limitations or restrictions as they apply to the City of South Miami or Dade County. 6. To exercise all or any part in combination of redevelopment powers as prescribed in Chapter 163, Part III, F.S. and that are not restricted by the SMCRA Redevelopment Plan'. South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan �� page 12 C. POWERS NOT GIVEN TO THE SMCRA 1. The following projects'may not be paid for or financed by increment revenues: (a) Construction or expansion of administrative buildings for public bodies or for police or-fire service. (b) Installation, construction, reconstruction, repair or alteration of any publicly owned capital improvements or projects which , are not an integral part of or necessary for carrying out the . SMCRA Redevelopment Plan, orwhich have received the approval of the governing body within three years of the adoption of the redevelopment plan, or which are normally financed by the governing' body with user fees. (c) General government operating expenses unrelated to the planning and carrying out of the SMCRA Redevelopment Plan. 2. The power to independently zone or rezone property; 3. The power to independently grant exceptions from building regulations; 4.. The. power to independently grant, exceptions from the Land . Development Regulations or City Code; 5. The power to independently close or vacate public rights -of -way; 6. The power to determine. an area to be a slum or blighted area, or combination thereof; -to designate such area as appropriate for community redevelopment; and to hold any public hearings as required with respect thereto; . 7. The power to grant final approval to the SMCRA Redevelopment Plan and amendments thereof; and South Miami Community Redevelopment Wan page 13 L >J 8. The power to authorize the issuance of revenue bonds as set forth in Section 163.385 F.S.. � G [SECTION THREE AUTHORITY10 UNDERTAKE REDEVELOPMENT The South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency (SMCRA) Redevelopment Plan has been prepared in accordance with.the State's. Community Redevelopment Act, Chapter 163, Part it Florida Statutes. The*,. adoption of this plan,.and any subsequent modifications or amendments, shall follow the procedures as required, by. public hearings and the adoption of the necessary resolutions and ordinances. In recognition of the need to prevent the spread of and eliminate the existence of slum and blighted conditions within the community,, the Community Redevelopment Act confers upon counties and municipalities the authority and powers to carry out " Community Redevelopment." For purposes of SMCRA's Flan, the following definitions as provided in Chapter 163, Part III, Florida Statutes, shall apply: "Community, redevelopment or redevelopment means undertakings, activities or projects of a county, municipality or community redevelopment agency in a community redevelopment area for the elimination and prevention of the development or spread of slums and blight or for the provision of affordable housing, whether for rent or sale, to residents of low or moderate income, including the elderly, and may include slum clearance and redevelopment in a community redevelopment-area, or rehabilitation or conservation in a community redevelopment area, or any combination or part thereof, in accordance with a community redevelopment plan and may includethe preparation of such'a plan." South Miami Community Redevelopment Plop �� page 15 The ability of a county or municipality to utilize the authority granted under the Act is predicated upon the adoption of a "Finding of Necessity". resolution' by the governing body, which is incorporated into this plan as Section 1. This finding demonstrates that:* (1) One'or more. slum or blighted areas, one or more areas in which there is a'shortage of housing affordable to residents of low or moderate income, includin g the elderly, exist in the county. or municipality; and . (2) The rehabilitation, conservation or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of such area or areas is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety, morals or welfare of the residents of the county or municipality. South Miami Community Redevelopment Man page 16 w C SECTION FOUR SAFEGUARDS AND .ACCOUNTABILITY A. SAFEGUARDS TO ENSURE REDEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES FOLLOW THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. The South Miami Community Redevelopment Area (SMCRA) shall file an annual report.with the State's Auditor General's Office, The Dade County Board of County Commissioners, the Dade- County Clerk's Office, the. City Commission and the City Clerk's Office. This report shall contain a programmatic overview of the activities of the SMCRA as allowed by the Redevelopment-Plan. 2. The SMCRA Board shall be fully subject to-the Florida Sunshine Law and, will meet at least on a monthly basis in a public forum..;. 3. The SMCRA shall provide adequate safeguards to :ensure. that. all... . leases, deeds, contracts, agreements and declarations of restrictions relative to any real property conveyed shall - contain restrictions, covenants, running with the land and its uses, or other such provisions necessary to carry out the goals and objectives of the Plan. 4. The SMCRA Board shall publicly adopt by -laws to govern its activities and to ratify its administrative policies. South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan �� page 17 TWA-) B. SAFEGUARDS TO ENSURE FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY 1. The SMCRA shall maintain adequate records to provide for an annual audit which shall be conducted by. an independent . knowledgeable auditor selected by the City Commission. The findings of.the audit shall be presented at a public meeting of the Board of the SMCRA and such.findings shall be forwarded to the State Auditor General's Office by March 31 of each year for•the preceding fiscal year which shall run' from October. 1 through September 30. The annual Audit Report shall be accompanied by the , SMCRA's Annual Report and shall be provided to the City Commission, City Clerk's Office, Dade County Board of.County Commissioners and the Dade County Clerk's Office for public (! review and availability. Legal notice in a newspaper of general circulation shall be provided to inform the public of the`availability for review of. the Annual Audit and Annual Report. 2: All SMCRA tax increment financing funds shall be held in a . Redevelopment Trust Fund separately from other funds as required by state law. C. SAFEGUARDS TO ENSURE PROPER IMPLEMENTATION AND PROJECT /PROGRAM ACCOUNTABILITY 1. Each SMCRA program shall establish measurable objectives upon its administrative, design and funding approval by the Board. ? 2. The SMCRA shall. hold semi- annual informational public workshops to: South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan page Is (a) report on programs and project status and progress;. (b) gather input from property owners, citizens and interested parties regarding redevelopment activities;. and. (c) *discuss strategies relating to local redevelopment issues. D. 'SAFEGUARDS THROUGH RETENTION OF CERTAIN POWERS BY THE CITY The following powers shall not be vested in the SMCRA: 1. The ability to zone or rezone property; 2. To abandon or vacate rights -of -way; 3. To approve the use of eminent domain powers to acquire property within the redevelopment area; , 4. ' To approve the issuance of redevelopment bonds; . 5. To approve -any. changes in the boundaries of the redevelopment area; and 6. To approve any amendment to the Redevelopment Plan. NOTE: 4,5 and 6 listed above also require the approval of the Dade County Board of County Commissioners. E. . PROVIDING FOR A TIME CERTAIN AND SEVERABILITY All redevelopment activities of a contractual, financial and programmatic nature shall have a maximum duration, or commitment of up to but not exceeding, thirty (30) years from the date of.adoption by the City, Commission of the City of South Miami and the 3oard of County Commissioners of Dade County. The start date for the thirty year clock shall be from the adoption and approval date of the Dade County `? Commission. South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan page 19 �m4M ISECTION'I'lVE AFFORDABLE HOUSING & RELOCATION POLICY A: AFFORDABLE HOUSING POLICY STATEMENT CURRENT HOUSING MARKET According to the Bureau of the Census 1990 housing figures, the number of existing housing units in-the City of South Miami actually decreased from 1980 , Jo 1990 by a total of 162 units. This occurs at a time when approximately two- thirds of the City's ad valorem tax burden falls upon residential property owners. This reduction in housing units further increases the tax burden on South Miami homeowners. Over this same ten -year span, the percent 'of households in the redevelopment area which are below the poverty level actually rose from 37% to 38 %, thus making it more difficult for. residents to compete for. quality home ownership- within, the,. City-of South-Miarhi. . .....:....... ..................... The existing pressure for affordable housing will be further increased by the advent of new service /retail jobs that will be created by the redevelopment of the Bakery Center into The Shops at Sunset. While this redevelopment creates welcomed new jobs and business opportunities, it will increase, the need for affordable hovsing.in the nearby area. The expansion of redevelopment area housing stock will allow for current and future South Miami residents of the redevelopment community to have low -cost transit access to job sites. South Miami Community Redevelopment Won A&6L page 20 Based upon 1995 data provided by the Beacon Council and the Appraisal and Real Estate Economic Associates,.lnc. (AREEA);.the average cost of a new home in Dade County.is $139,910.and rising. Used home sale prices average $125,956. These facts make it a priority for the SMCRA to adopt an Affordable Housing Policy that will: (1) Aggressively implement redevelopment programs that improve and protect the quality of existing" housing stock; .(2) Identify and acquire suitable vacant residential lots;. (3) Develop or cause private sector development of homes on the acquired lots; (4) ' Establish priorities for local builders, realtors, and financial. institution participation in the housing redevelopment program; (5j Establish and implement mortgage assistance programs and tools to assist homebuyers in the purchase 'of new homes; and (6)* Establish housing prices that reflect "affordability" in the market of potential homebuyers from the area and at the time of redevelopment. B. 'RELOCATION POLICY Under Florida Statute Section 163.362(7), the SMCRA is required to adopt a policy statement assuring that there will be replacement housing provided for those persons displaced from their homes by Agency- initioted community redevelopment activities. As stated and adopted in the SMC,RA Affordable Housing Policy portion of this plan, it is the Agency's goal and intent to increase the housing stock in the redevelopment area not to replace it with a non- residential use. There are no redevelopment programs being pursued or adopted designed to displace any residents from their homes. South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan ® page 21 In the future, if any unforeseen redevelopment project involving the SMCRA requires that even one person be involuntarily displaced from either a rented or owned housing unit, the project proposal must-contain a relocation plan, which adheres to all applicable laws. The relocation proposal must be ' approved by the Board of the SMCRA in a publicly noticed Agency meeting prior to any final approval of the project. If any future projects were to require relocation and Agency monies were to be "partnered" with Federal funds, the SMCRA shall'make it 'a' condition of Agency participation that all provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance Act are met. This strategy adheres to the requirements of Chapters 163 and 421, Florida Statutes. ' Soufh Miami Communify Redevelopment Plan page 22 0 SECTION SIX SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (SMCRA) GOALS The SMCRA's community redevelopment goals represent the desired . standards and guidelines and are' intended to provide a basis for decision- making by the SMCRA Board as well as stating the general direction. for redevelopment action. -They provide guidance for the establishment of public policy;, designing of redevelopment programs; appropriation of redevelopment funds; and the establishing of Agency priorities. The general redevelopment goals of the. SMCRA are as follows: (1) The City and all its departments shall work together with the SMCRA towards the shared goal of improving the quality of life for all citizens, businesses.and property owners in -the redevelopment. area.. .(2) The SMCRA shall work with the private sector, financial institutions and interested investors to the fullest extent it deems reasonable to facilitate the maximum investment of private funds in the redevelopment area. . (3) The SMCRA shall work and communicate with all interested community groups towards the successful implementation of all redevelopment programs. South Mlaml Community Redevelopment Plan ® page 23 C7� (4) The SMCRA Redevelopment Plan shall serve as the primary vehicle and provide the primary tools for the City's redevelopment effort. (5) All SMCRA supported or initiated developments shall attempt to comply with the goals, objectives and guidelines that are established by the City's development review - boards. (6) The SMCRA shall work towards leverciging-ahe maximum amount of non-..', tax increment financing resources possible to assist in the redevelopment of its assigned area. (7) The SMCRA shall actively pursue the purchase and/or redevelopment of vacant.or abandoned properties in the redevelopment area as a priority. (8) The SMCRA shall actively pursue successful Quick Victory projects in its earliest stages'to increase public awareness and support for the longer- range challenges and programs. (9) The. SMCRA will actively "partner" with both public and private sector entities towards the achievement of its redevelopment goals and to gain the maximum leveraging of assets and' cooperation. (10) The SMCRA, in cooperation with local residents, businesses and property owners and development interests, shall seek to identify and rehabilitate significant historical and cultural elements of the community. South Miami Community Redevelopment Wan page 24 (11) Where appropriate, the SMCRA shall encourage and facilitate an integrated system of pedestrian circulation, parks and open space in the redevelopment area with special emphasis on providing residents with easy and safe access to the commercial activity on the east side of US Highway One. . (12) The SMCRA shall support and participate-in the provision of an efficient parking system throughout the redevelopment area. (13) The SMCRA shall encourage that potable•water, wastewater treatment and 'stormwater drainage systems accommodate present and future demands in a timely, cost - efficient and equitable manner while protecting the health, safety and welfare of the system users and, the environment. (14) The SMCRA shall actively participate in environmental clean =up activities that it considers to be in the best interest of the community and where environmental problems are"an obstacle to successful redevelopment. (15) The SMCRA shall encourage the development of new housing units and the rehabilitation of,existing units in the redevelopment area. (16) The SMCRA shall provide for priority to be given to residents of the redevelopment area and secondly to those of the City of South Miami to purchase homes developed under the Redevelopment Plan. South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan ® page 25 (17) The SMCRA shall provide a priority for local builders, contractors, material providers and financial and real estate entities to participate in all housing programs to *the extent it deems legal and in the public interest. (18) The SMCRA shall strive .to implement'programs that increase the ad. valorem value of non - residential property to assist the City with moving towards reducing the disproportionately high share that is currently being paid by South Miami homeowners. (19) The SMCRA with the assistance of neighborhood-based organizations, housing authorities, financial institutions, government, development interests and real estate representatives 'shall preserve and enhance existing residential areas to provide a variety of housing opportunities for . all income levels. (20) The SMCRA shall undertake annual continuous improvement programs and other activities that are.designed to prevent the recurrence and spread of negative-conditions. (21) The SMCRA in cooperation with the City Police Department, Fire Department and Code Enforcement shall work to create a safe, quality environment for residents and businesses. (22) The SMCRA shall work with citizen groups and the Dade County School Board to identify additional educational facilities, structures, sites and opportunities included within the redevelopment area. CD . South Miami Communify Redevelopment Plan ,�. page 26 23 The SMCRA shall assist the City and other government entities to promote ( ) Y 9 . alternative modes of transportation and 'to maximize transit facilities and related economic and community uses. (24) The SMCRA shall implement programs that assist in removing the financial obstacles that may occur and prevent otherwise successful redevelopment projects and activities. (25) The SMCRA will work in concert with the goals of the Dade County Comprehensive Plan; the City of South Miami Comprehensive Plan and the Moss Plan, in addition to those established by Florida Statutes, as they relate to. the adopted City of South Miami's Community Redevelopment Plan. South Miami Community Redevelopment Won i6L page 27 SECTION SEVEN REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS, PROJECTS AND STRATEGIES INTRODUCTION This section contains. the programmatic tools which are designed to allow the SMCRA to bring about cumulative'redevelopment. Several of the programs are defined as "Quick Victories" QV :' .These programs.are those which should _F be undertaken -in the Agency's start-up: year, FY; ,19,9,8/9.9 and are. key to gaining public support and the momentum necessary to sustain the Agency through the more difficult redevelopment challenges. At the onset of each fiscal year, the Board shall establish its program and } project priorities in a way to ensure measurable accomplishments. At this time, the Board will also allocate financial resources based on priorities, community needs, likelihood of success and funding availability. A special public meeting will be held semi - annually to review the Agency's progress regarding its assigned programs for each fiscal year. It is prudent to consider redevelopment in five -year phases. Successes or failures in the Phasedd five -year period from FY 1998 /99 through FY 2002/03 will have a significant impact upon the revenue generating capability of the tax. increment financing mechanism used in.the redevelopment area for the funding of future programs. Each five years, the Agency's Board of Commissioners shall re- evaluate all sections of the SMCRA Redevelopment Plan and consider amendments and changes that would best serve the public interest. South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan page 28 PROGRAMS, PROJECTS AND STRATEGIES I. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOB CREATION Ia FRONT AND REAR BUILDING COMMERCIAL /RETAIL FACADE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. This program will provide matching grants, as determined by the SMCRA Board;•at.the time of implementation : - Which will allow•for business operators dnd property owners to make fixed (permanent) improvements to the front or rear of any commercial or retail structure. This program shall encourage improvements such as enhanced rear parking, lighting, security, � °p f� • - landscaping,signage and facade Sunset Drive 8� 58th Avenue treatments: g. _ • .1: +•S� :•_ :.`.:`. ;.yip.' B. LOCAL LABOR AND BUSINESS POOL. • The SMCRA shall compile a listing of eligible and interested businesses which hold an occupational license with the ; City of South Miami and perform services A, or sell goods that may be utilized in the implementation of- redevelopment;. programs. Working with Chambers of Commerce, merchant's associations and sunset Drive Area, a prime site for the economic development groups, a I Facade Improvement Program booklet describing redevelopment programs will be created and presented, South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan page 29 ..eon C and qualified ,businesses will be recruited and encouraged to sign -up for future work opportunities. C. VACANT�COMMERCIAL BUILDING REHABILITATION. Key underutilized vacant commercial buildings shall be identified, and the SMCRA will pursue the purchase, work to establish a joint- venture, or assist in. . the recruitment of business occupants to ensure these structures perform to Vacant Office next to Sheraton Four Points Hotel their economic potential. Two buildings have been identified on 68th Street and 70th Street which are quality. candidates for this program. D. BUSINESS INCUBATORS FOR SMCRA REHABILITATION BUILDINGS. Businesses that locate in buildings that are being rehabilitated by the Agency shall be eligible for special funding to High Potential Commercial Rehabilitation , Candidate on 68th Street r '' 'z.• assist in the creation of business incubators. The 7. I ,s' .; ' SMCRA shall consider, on a building -by- building basis, contributing to the start-up costs for fixed: inventory such as computers, phone.systems, office ,..;= ',::; ;< : ;.• equipment and other related business equipment. This equipment shall be the property of the Agency at the onset of each program. view from 701h Street South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan page 30 wna� c E. JOB CREDITS AS CURRENCY. The SMC.RA will initiate a special program designed to assist South Miami residents who are seeking to become self- sufficient and elimiriate their dependency on public welfare: The Agency will provide rental or loan reduction vouchers -for up to one year to any business leasing space in an SMCRA building in an amount equal to a portion of the salary paid to a new hire who is moving off of the welfare rolls. F. CRA SCHOLARSHIP WORK /STUDY PROGRAM. As part of the Agency's effort to maintain redevelopment amenities and the'cleanliness of the redevelopment area in general and to provide general administrative support, two part-time Agency positions shall be created as part of a scholarship program. Eligible applicants must be residents of South Miami and attending college. The scholarship fund will be named by the Board of Commissioners for a past community leader and awarded by the Board on an annual basis. G. MARKETING RESEARCH. Working with local Chambers' of Commerce, merchant's associations and economic development boards, the Agency shall provide. funding and guidance to, create-a useful and qucility marketing /�etai( mix plan. The goal of this plan is to provide information for business owners indicating what profitable business opportunities exist given the dynamics of the South Miami market. H. . ADVERTISEMENT AND PROMOTIONS. The SMCRA shall assist in the funding for the creation of marketing collateral and.television commercials aimed at increasing business volume in the area. The Agency shall also consider assisting in the funding of special events. South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan page 31 1 I. BUSINESS AND REDEVELOPER RECRUITMENT. In cooperation with the Beacon Council and Chamber South, the Agency shall take steps to actively recruit quality businesses, investors and redevelopers to the Community Redevelopment Area. J. LAND ACQUISITION. The Agency shall identify presently underutilized sites with high redevelopment potential for consideration of acquisition and the packaging of RPPs to stimulate redevelopment interests. This program shall be utilized as a secondary tool after efforts have been.made to encourage private sector i.. �.:�i. •'err. �;. A Willing Seller involvement take the lead in response to other redevelopment initiatives. K. BUSINESS INCENTIVE LOANS. The 'Agency will create a loan pool and program for qualified businesses in the redevelopment area to assist with the start -up costs and capital needs- of-new and expanding businesses. MMIGNAW L. REDEVELOPMENT LOAN GUARANTEES. The SMCRA shah establish a partnership with local banking and financial institutions by which an exchange for depository consideration of agency funds, the bank shall cooperate in the C) Potential Redevelopment Investment Site establishment of a revolving loan fund `�' and other redevelopment finance South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan page 32 programs. Agency monies allocated to this program.shall be used as "last. money in" guarantees or equity positions which will allow for major. redevelopment projects to secure -financing and be completed. M. UTILIZATION OF CRA FUNDS TO LEVERAGE MAXIMUM EXTERNAL REDEVELOPMENT DOLLARS. In cooperation with appropriate City-Departments, the SMCRA shall seek to utilize-tax increment finance ;-generated dollars to secure both public and, private grants. The sources considered should include the traditional government sources as well as special efforts to involve private foundations such as the South Miami Annenberg Partnership and other innovative private and public sources. N. COALITION OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS: The SNICRA shall :recruit the ,. involvement of interested local financial institutions.to participate "in any and all redevelopment programs, ranging from businesses loans and residential rehabilitation to subsidized mortgages and loan guarantees. South Miami Community Redevelopment Man page 33 0 Il. RESIDENTIAL REINVESTMENT A. RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION. The Agency shall provide a combination of grants and loans to residential property owners for the rehabilitation of their homes. These funds can be used for a broad range of permanent improvements including sewer hook -ups. Residential Rehabilitation Candidate'`��;`' B. IN -FILL & NEW HOUSING PROGRAM. The Agency will identify and purchase approximately twenty vacant lots in the redevelopment area, recruit local builders and build new homes. C. MORTGAGE SUBSIDY GUAKANiEE AND "SILENT SECONDS." High Priority Site for Acquisition and New Home Development at 591h Ave. •& -60_St; ` The Agency shall provide a pool'of mortgage money which will be available to purchasers of SMCRA -built residential homes and will serve as the "gap financing" between what banking institutions will lend and what a qualified potential homeowner can secure. The Agency shall have the authority to structure these second mortgages to be "silent" during the new homeowner's. Another Willing Seller for Residential Infill South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan page 34 C 7�1 70- 11 period of ownership. The Agency's position becomes active upon the sale of the property. The cap of these mortgages shall'be set by Board policy on an annual basis each year the program is active. D. ROLE MODECRESIDENTIAL RECRUITMENT PROGRAM. In order for a community to become sustainable, it is important for its younger citizens to view members of the community as role models. The SMCRA has identified police officers, firemen, educators, and medical care providers as quality role models for South Miami's youth. This program initiates a special recruitment effort to be undertaken by the Agency to market homeownership to membeo ` Of these professions for all housing- An Exisfing'Quality Home Serves as an Example related redevelopment programs. Thee for Residential Redevelopment Potential Agency will conduct special informational seminars with organizations employing "role models " -in an effort to inform them of the housing and mortgage assistance opportunities in the improving South Miami redevelopment area. South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan page 35 III. BEAUTIFICATION AND APPEARANCE IMPROVEMENTS A; QUICK VICTORY CLEAN -UP. Working with City Departments, the SMCRA shall identify the "dirty dozen" sites which will be targeted for the inaugural Fast Strike Clean -Up. For those property owners who have left their sites in a state of disrepair, the Agency shall initiate a Clean and Lien program. This shall be designated a Quick Victory program. !,Pt �`• •••w•.. ''At �{ .•,: 1. ••��••}�JSjK�i. Fast Strike Clean -Up Site B. LAN DSCAPING /STREETSCAPING PROGRAM. The Agency shall design F--1andscape Area along 64th Street shall be improvements along 641h Street from CRA boundary to boundary, 59th Place. 64th Street north to the northern CRA boundary and SW 68th Street between Red Road and SW 62nd Avenue. Another Quick Victory. top priority shall be the FP &L property. on 68th Street. 641h Street Landscaping & Streetscaping Site South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan page 36 .. AM=, and install landscape and streetscape ,s improvements, including landscape materials,. lighting, benches and trash r �K> M,.. �� : `::. receptacles in'-or identified b the p Y �' Board. The first phase of this program F--1andscape Area along 64th Street shall be improvements along 641h Street from CRA boundary to boundary, 59th Place. 64th Street north to the northern CRA boundary and SW 68th Street between Red Road and SW 62nd Avenue. Another Quick Victory. top priority shall be the FP &L property. on 68th Street. 641h Street Landscaping & Streetscaping Site South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan page 36 .. AM=, C. PAINT -UP /FIX -UP.' As a Quick Victory program, the Agency shall create and fund a simplified rehabilitation program designed to improve the appearance of the redevelopment area through extensive repainting of all'structures in the redevelopment area which apply to participate.' A prime candidate for this program shall be the. Lee Park Co -op. Paint -up, Fix -up Landscaping Site Lee Park Cooperative, a Prime Paint -Up /Fix -Up Project D. PUBLIC TRASH RECEPTACLES. The Agency shall create a contest to determine the design for public trash receptacles which will be purchased and installed with redevelopment funds. ' The SMCRA Board shall appoint the judging committee to select the preferred design. This shall be designated a Quick Victory program. E. ENTRANCE -WAY MONUMENT SIGNS. The Agency shall employ design professionals to create entrance -way monuments for the City borders that are coterminous with the redevelopment area. The recommendations for the selected monument style shall be made by the South Miami Community Development Council and will be subject to the required staff and Board South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan page 37 reviews and approval. The Agency will fund all aspects of design, building and installation of the monuments after final Board approval. F. SIGNAGE PROGRAM. The Agency shall encourage business owners to develop innovative and attractive signage by awarding partial funding for such signs. This shall be a Quick Victory program. G: ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. The Agency shall appropriate funds for the. purchase and installation of. Art in Public Places within the Redevelopment Area. Emphasis shall be placed on local artists- and themes. .0 IV. PARK IMPROVEMENTS A. SENIOR'S PARK.' This program will bring about the redevelopment of an. non- utilized section of Murray. Park" which borders 66th Street. The Agency, shall install two covered pavilions and other amenities designed for seniors and other citizens to gather,. participate in board games and conversation. A landscaping element Illlurray Park senior's Pavilion site shall also be included in this redesign. The SMCRA Board shall select a name for "Senior's Park" that honors a community leader... B. PARK IMPROVEMENTS. In addition to the improvements at Murray Park, the Agency shall fund arid create' a redesign of Marshall Williamson Park. The redesign will be done in a charette -type format to ensure a high degree of. "�ti,�•t'' «�. visibility and public ' :`�i:r ;•,•,;�� ��F '44l. }N.�"i ?:.^R"9 3�;;L� i' ^5,:!r,�� „• Rfvi �� ��,�.,i�'.v:5:yt•'•. � Y� ;�, {'N'�it.'Y" ,�s,�ix,.. � �%"Sfil{j . w;93c '.:,`L,�:�'•�3;ti�C M1.� �va. \7u A�46 f+ 42w' Y ���; : >, ,;} ✓ ,� �} i��,�y �" �,��� participation. The Agency's G ny.$ ✓ �'.j'� a y i eV' �' 4', f ya�IR.:• i44, � - '�' t(� i T �;0� RS 'st h;6ty„li•YS�.� §'NJ" Lti+�kr%ir�"t� 'Lf�i'l",:' !' 1t'k'�y`�� ,' f��s� �('� S �Yii ��'•• p`Y Ft r b:;t'.'.�:t �,� i��"Fr z �� Board shall establish a. "build- �� to budget, and the Agency will work with other Marshall Williamson Park appropriate City departments to ensure its implementation. South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan page 39 V. TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS AND ALTERNATIVES A. TROLLEY. The SMCRA will fund two free public trolleys. One trolley will.be primarily used as a community connector and run through the western portion of the redevelopment area, connecting it with. the commercial portion across US 1. This trolley's primary responsibility is to provide safe, free and convenient transportation of area residents-to jobs and shopping. in the A Good Example of a Community Trolley commercial /retail portion Of -the redevelopment area. The second trolley will have a route primarily established to provide access to the commercial and retail businesses for visitors to South Miami. The pick -up points for this trolley will be tied into the SMCRA Master Parking Program, the MetroRail and other high density destination points.. Advertising will be sold to defray the cost of trolley operation. B. PARKING PROGRAM. With the advent of The Shops at Sunset opening in the Fall of 1998, there will likely be an economic expansion which will cause increased demand for area parking. The Agency shall fund, participate in and facilitate the creation of a Parking Master Plan and a Parking Program Redevelopment Fund. The Agency's financial role in the development of each parking facility will be determined on a case -by -case basis. C. BICYCLE PARKING AND FACILITIES. To encourage the use of alternative modes of transportation, the Agency shall identify appropriate locations for secured bicycle parking areas, lockers and related facilities. These areas shall South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan page 40 be integrated into major commercial and retail redevelopment projects as well as trolley destinations and major employers. VI. HISTORIC PRESERVATION A. SURVEY OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES AND SITES., In conjunction with `the Historic Preservation Board, the SMCRA shall fund a survey of structures and sites to identify those of historic, cultural and social significance in South Miami's past. B. HISTORIC PRESERVATION GRANTS AND LOANS. The SMCRA shall provide specialized grants and loans-to meet the needs -and fund the opportunities identified in the Historic Preservation Survey. • These funds shall also be used.to leverage additional public and private funds for this purpose. c South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan page 41 Ai► uu! Lel VII. INFRASTRUCTURE A. INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS. Working with appropriate City departments, the Agency may consider funding infrastructure deficiencies and projected needs, including utilities., roadways, sidewalks and stormwater management. All infrastructure projects funded by the Agency shall be directly tied to increasing the area's redevelopment potential to generate a higher return of F Site near Commerce Lane tax increment funds and increase the likelihood of private investment. This program is not designed to replace the City's efforts to secure a CDBG and ,pthen' similar. funds-- but ao' ``� • .. .� . If I k au 't' .a�Zyr• r• VIII. ENVIR0NMENTAL.CLEAN`UP.;. A. .'ENVIRONMENTAL CLEAN -UP. The SMCRA Board of Commissioners shall establish a fund which may be used to Infrastructure project located on 63rd Street - between 591h Avenue & 591h Place assist in the clean -up of environmentally contaminated sites. The Agency will activate this , program in'the event that a viable and desirable redevelopment . r•t project t . necessitates the reuse of a contaminated site. The degree of the Agency's Light Industrial Land Use South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan page 42 financial participation will be determined by the Board on a case -by -case basis contingent upon the redevelopment value of the project. CHARTER SCHOOL A.- CREATION OF CHARTER SCHOOL. The 'Agency, working with community leaders, shall consider purchasing a site for a charter school to be located near the J.R. Lee Elementary t School. If deemed in the public interest, the Board may assist the establishment of a charter school financially by accepting rental payment for a long -term lease for the site ' . where the school.facility will be built in an amount equal to Potential site at 66th Street & 60th Avenue what the Agency would receive in annual TIF payments from this site. This will reduce the total capital costs of the establishment"of a charter school by app�oximateiy 25�: This project can be accomplished utilizing the Land Acquisition Fund or through other sources. IX. AIR RIGHTS A. AIR RIGHTS. As provided in Section 163, Florida Statutes, the Agency shall acquire air rights when necessary for the creation of parking facilities or signage. South Miami Community. Redevelopment Plan page 43 AMUM c X. CODE ENFORCEMENT A. CODE ENFORCEMENT ENHANCEMENT " PROGRAM. Working with City departments, the SMCRA shall fund increased code enforcement services within the redevelopment area. The goal of this program is to increase the marketability and aesthetics of the properties in the redevelopment area. XI. POLICE A. POLICE SUB - STATION. The Agency will work with redevelopers to, locate rent -free police sub - stations in key locations in the redevelopment area. The Agency will fund a portion of police officer's salaries for specialized police activity, such as officers stationed on the trolleys (trolley cops), bicycle officers and horse- mounted officers. Overgrown Lot in Violation of City Code U.S. Post Office XII. REDEVELOPMENT ADVOCACY A. REDEVELOPMENT ADVOCACY. The SMCRA shall actively advocate for actions by other public and private bodies which are to the benefit of area residents. Examples of this type of advocacy work include the beautification of the U.S. Post Office and the FP &L site. FP &L Quick Victory Landscape Improvement Site South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan page 44 M ISECTION.-EIGHT1 REDEVELOPMENT FINANCE AND BUDGET PROJECTIONS A. UNDERSTANDING THE BUDGET PROCESS The projected revenue expenditures presented in this section are required.,as part of a. complete redevelopment plan, but do not commit the SMCRA Board " of Commissioners to any expenditure-of funds: The Board shall adopt an annual budget and work program in accordance. with its adopted By -Laws at the onset of each fiscal year. This process will be carried out in accordance with the Dade•County Interlocal Agreement and Florida Statutes.: B.. PROJECTED REVENUE FOR FIVE -YEAR PHASE 1. IMPLEMENTATION -PROGRAM The SMCRA will make every effort to leverage non -TIF funds such a5'grants for the redevelopment effort. For purposes of the budget, the only -two revenue sources presented are annuaL.TIF.and an estimated $8 million TIF Revenue Bond issued early in the Agency's second year. It should be noted that the issuance of any redevelopment bond must be approved by the City Commission and the Dade County Board of County Commissioners.. Bond revenues combined with annual TIF revenue of approximately $1.3 million starting in FY 1999/2000 and annual TIF revenue of approximately $50,000 in the start-up year total approximately $13;250,000 available for the Five -Year Phase I Redevelopment Program. The year -by -year break -out of revenue availability is presented below: It should be noted that all figures presented are estimates only. South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan page 45 It is important to note.that the revenue projections utilize current City and County millage rates. Revenues will fluctuate based upon future - millage rate changes, the Total Taxable Value of the redevelopment area, and the degree of County participation. The estimates used are based upon a contribution by Dade County of 95% of the total tax increment generated .in the redevelopment area. C. PROJECTED EXPENDITURES . Listed below is a budget matrix which includes all of the redevelopment programs presented in this. Plan. in Section Seven. In addition, an entry for .Project Implementation and Management has been added to identify operating costs. It is important to note that the dollar amounts used in this category are capped at 20% of annual TIF revenues. This is the standard allocation for implementation and management and cannot be exceeded; however, it may be reduced. This allocation must be authorized by the Interlocal Agreement with the Dade County Board of County Commissioners and the South Miami City Commission. The revenues for the SMCRA start-up year will be relatively small. It will be the Agency's strategy to implement Quick Victory projects with the first year's annual TIF. -The SMCRA Board of Commissioners will determine which Quick South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan page 46 Victory programs are to be undertaken when they adopt the first year work plan and official budget. South Miami Community Redevelopment Pion' page 47 • o tFY 1998199' FY °w1999/OO. M ' FX 000/01 'F' FY�200TJ.02 r F,K2002/03'; ► ,�i2 �r�.t eL �'r ry w �.�;f,;,,•r �u�.�`,a c ,. tin w 4'1 .y��rr,��,� s. ;r 1.' 5 "Trb4rTtN•::4 .t di r`l!p /_L�t�w:.'f, !'•ti:�`'4. ,vt.. rr•..bg."• ity`i',��"V'h'.S�k`�t. Ate_ X�:': P•x::�S: .�°� _0_ $260,000 $260,000 $260,000 $260,000 1r• i . i+ i i .� is �.��.'�'�, J t+}C.e�. tlmplernentcfiionx� ... x��Nlana ement� . Rrograrris`8`° " r a'7K,y,W �4w. �.fo $50,000 $5,040,000 9 $4,20000 $940,000 •.$ 290, 000 p4'i.C: TIFBond'Debfi� $800,000 $800,000 : 7Senrice. �: ri.: 't'r�.'�k{,.��•y�i�",�;,a'i:�'y • s56,656T $5,300,000 4,550,000 $2,000,000 $1,350,000 1x HYr�� tib_,.{<m q �NwwurX�•�NtrA *'ysy Cl •n �� if YY` L N 4 4 : T J r.r' . r i .+. 4;:: %!i.•t.i for�'e•:� th . (.y4'+ty ?v.s ry. T 'ti.SS $13 250 000 .5 "P l�.�w yr� s4 •t Y+.7 ?e.� 2�'' 1�"�. t�.C:.'�Tty1 yiit� ,t• .I (f 1+. r�'.n'i'�y`• �1ti �CVV '_+6 �SfMKi�'Th r1' J t ��'l.\ r� !t Y.� i }� '�'1 •�i�S .,r..yi 1�' y it..i Y'T.liz�i���e w�. ZIJ��4�'!i ! P' .ri.�n7;lhC;Y .lr ..L�Rp'� ��1.�,'.,' >j. yFn!e.•Y:edr.�Pliase:.I Jlrti Iemenfafion�P.ro ��`����, „����a�f�Yy, },� ram South Miami Community Redevelopment Pion' page 47 H O C' ySy y 3 n 3 c m a m s a 4 O 7 a 0 m A CD 0 "Alk m D .n z z n T. ,1 ^0 cn OA 0 D m z • r . rn m z. o. z' m aii - i 1 • 1 1 �j Tn 1 any - Ez� �, ;- •�,Gi� 1 1 1 \::•� Y... t r�r�� is ..: C., Y._.. E'•{ ,: i �N - - - - - - - - - - - - o i:IC7•• ici•'p 0 "Alk m D .n z z n T. ,1 ^0 cn OA 0 D m z • r . rn m z. o. z' m N O a 3 f'1 3 C m a m O W 4 0 _ V O m A a -n o D -n Z Z n CD cn n 'O cn 00 D m r D Z r- m m Z D O z EO �� ■t �G; a fC� .. {{,.C;F � n `i'g�� i, 1 F 6 i '�� �:. J. 1 � f �.N 7 i g-1'• }'� 1 A (""iw ;h-afi L'� • 1 � i��� rye ,-tA -, of ^ ■ - • iRi ,r. i Y u mi ���: v ice. A� � �.. Ml h ;'J�tF 4 .v1„f ,� 'MY 7 `t r't •:'r`; i •.� vcox °'^-,� :'i; ';.fir M 4'•Na..• t�0 -n o D -n Z Z n CD cn n 'O cn 00 D m r D Z r- m m Z D O z EO ItEC . TIO N t NINE NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT OF PROGRAMS A.- INTRODUCTION The-South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency (SMCRA) contains a number of residential units occupied by low to moderate income households. This section provides .a review of potential impacts to the .area residents and the neighborhoods.'in general. Redevelopment in South Miami is in its earliest stages. and future impacts .of cumulative redevelopment activities can not be quantified. Future impacts generated by redevelopment activities will be reviewed on'a case by case basis as the proposed projects proceed through the various stages, boards and activities with the development approval process'. B. LAND USE, ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS At the time of the adoption of the Plan, it shall be the intent of the SMCRA to conform to all pertinent laws, ordinances and resolutions of the City of South Miami as it relates to the approval of required permits or development orders for SMCRA- initiated projects which require'such approvals. C. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION The redevelopment area contains an existing roadway network that services the area. There are isolated roadways (near .63rd Street and 59th Place) that may need to be repaved or rerouted by the SMCRA to improve general traffic flow. There is presently no redevelopment project planned that will cause the failure -of any existing roadway., The major impact on traffic circulation is being addressed by The Shops at Sunset (Bakery Centre) DRI Development South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan page 31 Ai6f Order, as approved by City Resolution No. 134 -94 -9536 adopted December 6, t„ 1994 and its subsequent amendments. In addition, the City has recently received approval by the Florida Department of Community Affairs of its Evaluation and Appraisal Report which updated all elements of the Comprehensive Plan, including Transportation. The SMCRA Plan shall not be in conflict with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan. The intent of the SMCRA is to provide. traffic circulation improvements,. which will increase the redevelopment capacity and residential quality of life. The utilization of compact development..patterns and redevelopment projects, such as infill housing and - mixed =use development of larger vacant areas, will encourage the use of-alternative and less expensive means of transportation. Those alternatives to the single - occupant automobile will be a public trolley, bicycles and walking by residents and visitors. The guidelines in City advocated programs such as Transit Oriented Development District (TODD) and a pedestrian overpass will further improve the quality of transportation in the SMCRA. D... COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND- SERVICES The SMCRA's activities are anticipated to have a positive impact on existing *community facilities and services within the redevelopment area. The Plan's strategy is to retain, improve and expand existing facilities such as Murray Park and Marshall Williamson Park. The SMCRA will also advocate a broader, more locally and'economically oriented use of the existing MetroRail station. This may include a future commercial /retail component. The SMCRA will also work to improve the fivo vacant, buildings located on SW.68th Street near the, City's proposed Multi- Purpose Center site on the corner of SW 58th Place and SW 68th Street. Any'redevelopment of these properties will C1. South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan page 52 jbe designed and undertaken in a way to reduce the cost of the Multi- Purpose . Center follow in g the activities. spe i ccall addressed ssed by Chapter 163, F.S.. An example of a joint benefit would be SMCRA- developed parking that would be shared by the Multi- Purpose Center. The Agency may also provide landscaping in the pubic rights -of -way that would be of benefit to the Multi= Purpose Center. A landscape, streetscape and sidewalk improvement program throughout the redevelopment area will also be implemented by the Agency: E. EFFECT ON SCHOOL PROPERTIES The JRE Lee-Community School, an "alternative-school," is presently the only school in the redevelopment area. According to the Dade County' School Board, the capacity of the school is 297 students while-the enrollment is 300 (1.01 % of capacity). The. residential program, consisting primarily of infill housing and rehabilitation of existing housing, is projected to likely, increase the school age population by fewer than thirty of students of various ages. An additional benefit of*redevelopmenttyill be the increase in property valuei which will increase the revenue provided to the Dade County School System. F. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY The redevelopment activities of the SMCRA Plan will add special programs and funding to ensure environmental quality. In addition to drainage, sewer hookups and other more traditional redevelopment programs, the Agency will create a fund and programs to address the more serious environmental clean -up problems associated with the re -use of contaminated sites. -Without funds allocated specifically for environmental clean -up; it may not be financially feasible to redevelop contaminated sites when future opportunities arise. South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan page 53 as mur South Miami Middle School and South Miami Elementar 6750 and 6800 SW 60 Street 641 .. Ftrara Sum Ludlam Elementary , 6639 SW 74 Street IOTI Oavl� ?airchild Elementary School i757 SW 45 Street (which is Ldjacent to City's boundary) f.RE. Lee Center 5521 SW 62 Ave Dade County. Public Schools Adjacent-to and Within the NORTH C, City of South Miami Not to scale South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan page 53 A ISECTIO'N.-TEN'l SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT. AGENCY PLAN AMENDMENT PROCESS The South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency (SMCRA) Redevelopment Plan shall'be in effect for a maximum of thirty (30) years from the date of its adoption. It may be terminated earlier if the redevelopment projects and programs in the Plan:are deemed complete. or if the City Commission determines- there -is no longer'a need-for the SMCRA to exist. The Plan may need to be amended in order for it to maintain its' relevance and currency; to respond to priorities'as they emerge; to serve new redevelopment areas; and to add needed specificity as projects, tax increment revenues and expenditures are defined in more detail overtime. Amendments to the Plan can only be made 'by the City Commission upon recommendations of the SMCRA Board. The SMCRA will initiate, any amendment action by adopting a Resolution recommending that the City Commission amend the Plan in a specified manner: The-SMCRA ma"then hold an advertised public hearing on the proposed modification or amendment and approve the modification by passage of-an appropriate Resolution. Any. amendment action also requires pre- notification of the affected taxing authorities by registered mail. Fund approval for any Plan amendment must be made by the Dade County Board of County Commissioners. The governing State Statute does not specifically require that Plan amendments be reviewed by the Local Planning Agency (Planning & Zoning Board) for conformity with the Comprehensive Plan; but this may be advisable if there is any question relative to.an amendment's conformance with the City Comprehensive Plan. Also, at the time of amendment approval, the original South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan page S4 OIT "findings" made at the time of Plan adoption [F.S. 163.360(6)(a -d)] should be reaffirmed with regard to the proposed amendment or modification. If any provision of this Community Redevelopment Plan or subsequent amendments shall be found to be invalid, unconstitutional or otherwise legally infirm, such provision shall not affect the remaining portions. of the Plan. THE AMENDMENT PROCESS Florida Statutes require that the Community Redevelopment Plan be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. In order to remain current and allow for the flexibility required for SMCRA to avail itself of development opportunities, the Community Redevelopment Plan may have to be amended when programs are changed or as new programs are added. This Plan, at the time of its adoption, is not in 'conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The first step in the Redevelopment Plan Amendment process is an administrative determination by the City Manager as to whether the proposed amendments to the Redevelopment Plan is procedural /technical (e.g., changes to dates, amounts of project funding, program modification, project specifications modifications, updates, etc.) or substantive (e.g., changes to the redevelopment area boundaries or granting of a new power). A procedural /technical amendment shall go directly to the City Commission with a staff finding and recommendation. Under a substantive amendment, the amendment would first be reviewed by the Local Planning Authority (Planning and Zoning Board) for determination of -conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and then forwarded to -the City Commission with recommendations. A substantive change shall also be required to receive approval by the Dade County Board of County Commissioners: South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan page SS C ISECTI.ON.'.ELEVEN'i TECHNICAL INFORMATION, MAPS AND GENERAL PLANNING POLICY This section contains a checklist charting the location of all requirements -for.a Community Redevelopment Plan as contained in this document and identified in Section 163.362 F.S.. A. TECHNICAL PLAN ELEMENT -vv � tT . .O;"ECHNICALATEM SECTI NYt,�e, ', iY Legal Description and Justification for the Redevelopment Area Boundaries 1 General Description of Redevelopment Area 1 Neighborhood Impact Review 9 Identification of any Capital Improvement Projects in - the Redevelopment Area in the City of South- Miami CIP Bud et 11 Affordable Housing Policy Statement - 5- Relocation Policy 5 . Safeguards and Accountability Element 4, Projected Redevelopment Expenditures . .8- Statement Providing a Time Certain for Completing.All Redevelop ment Tasks 4 The following technical elements are addressed in more detail as described below. f 1 l_ Identification of any Capital Improvement Proiects in the Redevelopment Area in the City of South Miami CIP Budget: The City'of South Miami, as in the case with most cities with a population under 25,000, has a limited Capital Improvements Program. The City is actively pursuing funding for the development of a Neighborhood Community Center which will be located in South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan page 56 ie� the Redevelopment Area. The primary funding source for this project is being. 'Y sought through rant funds. In addition, the City also undertakes,repaving and beautification on a systematic annual basis regarding street improvements. This is funded in the City's annual operating budget. (21 Statement Providin4 a Time Certain for Completing All Redevelopment Tasks:' As prescribed in Section 163.362(10), F.S:; the time certain.for-the completion of all redevelopment tasks and programs presented in the SMCRA Plan shall occur 30 years after the plan is approved, adopted or amended pursuant to Section 163.361(1) F.S.. All tax increment financing revenue from all= sources will cease to be collected and deposited into the SMCRA. Redevelopment Trust Account after the 30 year period has ended.. The SMCRA shall adhere to all requirements as* set forth in Chapter 163, A and it .the Interlocal Agreement approved by the Dade County Board of " County .Commissioners. To the greatest extent it determines feasible, the SMCRA will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the needs of the community for private sector participation in redevelopment activities. The SMCRA will make every effort to responsibly leverage its financial resources to generate the maximum amount of funding for redevelopment activities. This includes but is not limited to utilizing TIF monies as matching funds for public and private grants. The SMCRA will work in concert with groups such as Enterprise Florida, the Beacon Council, Chamber South and the Red /Sunset Merchant's Association to South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan page 57 create positive economic development and to foster job creation and business opportunities in the assigned Redevelopment Area. All SMCRA development activities shall be subject to the City. of South Miami's Land Development Code, Comprehensive Plan and the City Code of Ordinances. The SMCRA will work with all local groups to, ensure public input and participation in the implementation of its,RedeVelopment Plan and activities. The SMCRA will work to coordinate and maximize all redevelopment activities with the appropriate local governments, housing authorities, Dade County, the State of Florida and the Federal Government: South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan page SS a: N �t �,,�.� - � � tttt�ts __ ��t., ..o ..l�ttttt ttt�'ttt ttt tt O C�\ J71 �: F-T 0 0.2 Miles t •`rj Responses to CRA Board Inquiries of September 30, 2004 1. (Wiscombe) Explain the salary fluctuations for the code enforcement officer position over the years: See attached 2. Provide the'salary for CRA staff last year 2003 -2004. See attached 3. (Hakeem) interest Revenue FY -03 -04 for cover sheet. See attached 4. (Mayor) What is the percentage increase for Coordinator? 29% 4. (Mayor) A pay plan should be adopted for future increases. There is an existing pay plan.' See attached 5. (Wiscombe) Remove Code Enforcement and Police Officers from CRA Budget and place back in the general fund. Addition of Code Enforcement and Police Officers is required by the CRA Plan. Seepage 44 enclosed play 6. (Wiscombe) request a presentation on the Mobley Building (Mayor wants to discuss long term planning. Staff respectfully requests additional time to prepare presentation. Two weeks are inadequate to examine the property and develop a long term plan. 7. (Sherar) line item for Richard Miller is on hold until board has more information. Budgeted line item will not be spent until information is provided to Board 8. (Mayor) Credit Counseling - how many people would $3,000 dollars help:' 40 9. (Wiscombe) Multi- Family Grant for the Unit Owner applies only to the Lee -Park Condo.. Research maintenance agreement to ensure funds aren't disbursed for condo related requirements. As of this date, staff has been unsuccessful in obtaining condo documents. 10. (Wiscoznbe) UM students should be utilized to perform studies. UMwill be requested to perform future studies 11. (Mayor) Do we pay taxes on CRA owned properties? No. See attached 12. (Sherar) Wounded Healers •- Where are building materials purchased from? Home Depot 13. (Mayor) Predatory Lending—. First National Bank of South Miami has been contacted and will perform counseling and community workshop. F8% 0 CA • 0C 000 m 0 0 0 0 0 Q o. c. c. CL .0 mmmmm r. m m m m m O m > 0 > > -< 0 0 0 0 0 m m m m m m m 00000 0 0 0 0 0 m m m m m NNNN -� 0 0 0 0( 0 OOOOco W N-000 N N N N N O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 4AA W O .9h..r,.a, CA) CA) A�! N0 00 �n cor'CA,� co �a P N - O �IN.pNO .( r O.A000O W W W N N In GJ IV O co 0031 rn � morno a O w 90 N N .1A w p o o m 00 w aD aD w .A N OD 00 O r cn -• CA) CA) N 03 .Aw0 o°0iaca Awrnrno co W ' .3O -' W O CA V W 'C'*- 4kODO OWCO O m Z w CA) CA) CA) w wwC,wcaca r N N N N N CC C .i -+ CO to N O O0 Cn000w A. 3 A OODO -gyp 'flm MCn t»- M CA Co W 0 cn m o cO ao 0) 0) Z CO co O co S. N W O W M ^1 M W 0 V W O CA CO V CO O Z V co N O W N m O CD a) rn X C--4 O ACO1100DC)� �7 F8% 0 CA • "1 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2004 -2005 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET i ,r O .'i E F G H I J K L M N 1 AFSCME BARGAINING UNIT EMPLOYEE GROUP 2 EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1, 2004 3 PAY SALARY 4 CODE CLASS TITLE 5 RANGE RANGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 7 8 330 CHIEF CODE 31 -6 A $37,782 $39,671 $41,655 $43,737 $45,924 $48,220 9 ENFORCEMENT BW $1,453 $1,526 $1,602 $1,682 $1,766 $1,855 10 OFFICER H $18.164 $19.073 $20.026 $21.028 $22.079 $23.183 11 12 315 CODE 28 -6 A $32,637 $34,269 $35,982 $37,781 $39,670 $41,654 13 ENFORCEMENT BW $1,255 $1,318 - $1,384 $1453 $1,526 $1,602 14 OFFICER H $15.691 $16.475 $17.299 $18.164 $19.072 $20.026 '15 455 MOTOR POOL SUPERVISOR 32-6 A $36,912 $40,857 $42,900 $45,045 $47,297 $49,662 17 BW $1,497 $1,571 $1,650 $1,733 $1,819 $1,910 18 H $18.708 $19.643 $20.625 $21.656 $22.739 $23.876 19 20 454 LEAD MECHANIC 32-6 A $38,912 $40,857 $42,900 S45,045 $47,297 $49,662 21 BW $1,497 $1,571 $1,650 $1,733 $1,819 $1,910 22 H $18.708 $19.643 $20.625 $21-6561 $22.739 $23.876 23 24 429 FIELD FOREMAN 31-6 A $37,059 $38,912 $40,857 $42,900 $45,045 $47,297 25 BW $1,425 $1,497 $1,571 $1,650 $1,733 $1,819 26 H $17.817 $18.708 $19.643 $20.625 $21.656 $22.739 27 28 445 FIELD FOREMAN 28-6 A $32,013 $33,613 $35.294 $37,059 $38,912 $40,857 29 BW $1,231 $1,293 $1,357 $1,425 $1,497 $1,571 30 H $15.391 $16.160 $16.968 $17.817 $18.708 $19.643 31 321 417 STREET MAINTENANCE 28-6 A $32,013 $33,613 $35,294 $37,059 $38,912 $40,857 33 SUPERVISOR BW $1,231 $1,293 $1,357 $1,425 $1,497 $1,571 34 H $15.391 $16.160 $16.968 $17.817 $18.708 $19.643 35 36 440 AUTO MECHANIC 27 -6 A $30,488 $32,013 $33,613 $35,294 $37,059 $38,912 37 BW $1,173 $1,231 $1,293 $1,357 $1,425 $1,497 38 H $14.658 $15.391 $16.160 $16.968 $17.817 $18.708 39 401 415 PARKS & STREET SUPERVISOR 27-6 A $30,488 $32,013 $33,613 $35,294 $37,059 $38,912 41 BW $1,173 $1,231 $1,293 $1,357 $1,425 $1,497 42 H $14.658 $15.391 $16.160 $16.968 $17.817 $18.708 43 44 425 HEAVY EQUIPMENT OPERATOR 26-6 A $29,036 $30,488 $32,013 $33,613 $35,294 $37,059 45 BW $1,117 $1,173 $1,231 $1,293 $1,357 $1,425 46 H $13.960' $14.658 $15.391 $16.160 $16.968 $17.817 47 481 420 WASTE COLLECTION DRIVER 24-6 A $26,337 127,654 "$29,036 $30.488 $32.013 $33,613 49 BW $1,013 $1,064 $1,117 $1,173 $1,231 $1,293 50 H. $12.662 $13.295 $13.960 $14.658 $15.391 $16.160 51 52 408 MAINTENANCE WORKER III 24-6 A $26,337 1 $27,654 $29.036 $30,488 $32,013 $33,613 53 BW $1,013 $1,064 $1,117 $1,173 1 $1,231 $1,293 54 H $12.662 $13.295 $13.960 $14.658 $15.391 $16.160 55 56 405 LEAD WORKER 22.6 A $23,888 $25,083 $26,337 $27,654 $29,036 $30,488 57 BW $919 $965 $1,013 $1,064 $1,117 $1,173 58 H $11.485 $12.059 $12.662 $13.295 $13.960 $14.658 59 60 410 MAINTENANCE WORKER 11 21-6 1 A $22,751 $23,888 $25,083 $26,337 $27,654 $29,036 611 BW $875 $919 $965 $1,013 $1,064 $1,117 62 H $10.938 $11.485 $12.059 $12.662 $13.295 $13.960 63 64 412 REFUSE COLLECTOR 21-6 A $22,751 $23,888 $25,083 $26,337 $27,654 $29,036 65 BW $875 $919 $965 $1,013 $1,064 $1,117 66 H $10.938 $11.485 $12.059 $12.662 $13.295 $13.960 67 1681 435 AUTO MECHANIC HELPER 20 -6 A $21,667 $22.751 " $23,888 $25,083 26,337 $27,654 1691 BW $833 $875 $919 1965 $1,013 $1,064 70 H $10.417 1 $10.938 1 $11.4851 $12.059 $12.662 $13.295 O .'i CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI INTER- OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Maria V. FROM: Jeanette SUB3ECT: Employe DATE: October "Str South Miami AFAnWea CRY 2001 Attached herewith is the information requested for the following classification pay information: For the fiscal year 2002/2003, information is as follows: Administrative Secretary, $10,400 Community Outreach Coordinator $ 30,033 CRA Director $ 91,087 (50% of this amt. was coming from CRA budget) For the fiscal year 2003/2004, information is s follows: Administrative Secretary $26,852 Community Outreach Coordinator $31,083 CRA Director $67,000 For this fiscal year 2004/2005 is as follows: Administrative Secretary $26,852 Community Outreach Coordinator $40,264 CRA Director $10,000 Please advise.if additional information is requested. i CD N CD CL co N O �P fg% o �n 3 v cc o m z N 0 QD -� N cD O N CD -I � 0 -4K I ;a o ni c rt =r -C < m m�0��o�z a42 1 m CD � C. °c m ° ;1 CO CCDD m m N =r < < = C m O - C W i CD O. 0 a N �1 ccnCD Z -n a �. CD � m 5 CD -+ - -n o� Qoo :c° CD 3 =� =• < =. CD CD �, a CD an ;°. CD 40 40 W 'rl 4AWW &-< W" A N O" O o - 1-10 —0 0 " CD W O W O j W W O C O CDCDOOOOOOZW NNOOOOOO -� a -n co <n -4 W � Q O -1 O -4 -i fA al N N C CO W Cn 00 O 0 -I CJl N Z A W N 0 0 0 0 N W --1 W O W O W M N -A CCA-400 -� -4��C° NNO��CDNOZD N O" O m 0 CA O -i 0 O .P W O O CJt CD CA O O N C p C NO C) .4p Z mom cn m < C Z G < cm� m —i O cn -o m Z D m EA , 0 00 .P. m X a m Z 0 -i C X m I O n cn O 2 D n N O O O cn T V 0 T O CD T W C v m --i O -I m m W O O D m -i O 0 O D r 'n w 0 o in to a c n c• 0 v a w 0 S w c Q. m - n o c o 0 =; m 0 w co 0 �, (D N u n w 5. 0 n sp n w n 3 (Cn (D o� o c o c " a m 0 3 w 0- CL m ? rr c m (D a w n �' (o 0• 0 1 N c 00 0 0 0 vi o v Z'0 o w c o G7 o w o w A '6 0 - 7 IA (� 3 C O C y (D p .r� O p� f0 CD FL ' w Cl) O cr .. w y O O CO C �r (1) c CD ++ e C co v � y o� n C1 lD, o< o C7 y R� r (D ; w (� o O m ` w O 0 t0 c n� N c 2. a w p_ y \ a .w3. > m" 3 D a v' 3 n c w ° °' o 3 m a 3 Or O n N p fu ti w n y a 0 o < < 3 N cD y � N_ CD w � CD w N Cl 3 N 6 [2 w N (D N V a 0 m rt .a J co N CA V N V of V to V Q1 CT N O CI in A CT OD O tD co W 0 0 O O O M O V O V O A 10 1 10.)l 0 jojojof0 0101 O O O O c* O W O 1141 1 C CL to CVO N N -+ W co co 00 V r0•. in O O CA (T N O 0 CT N O N OD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m C a W to D OD . .�V O O O O O O O O O O O O O O D 0 C w N Cn O N CT � W O 000 A A W CT 0) W V CW7� A O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O CD G) JO (A ' EA , 0 00 .P. m X a m Z 0 -i C X m I O n cn O 2 D n N O O O cn T V 0 T O CD T W C v m --i E O c a 0 fir N C a 6 Er m c CL c to m CL A A U3 O O O O O O CD �• .a O m C Cl O O O O O CL U3 O N O O CD N CONiI CL A N A co m O S V C07� fOJ� p O 0010 V O O O V O O m V O 010 0 O 0 c CL M Co J Cn CD 0) 0 W N ? co CD 0 O 0 0, O .P O O O O O CO O O N O O h O O O O O O c p W .CD m co A A OD C fy N O V (T W a) O O O O O r O ul W O A O O N C a 6 Er O c a 1 0 Sr m c CL c to CD CL U3 0 o cLT'i� c°n O CD �• .a O Cl O O O O O _ O N O O W CONiI CL m O S V C07� fOJ� p O O V O O O V O O O V O 010 0 O 0 III M c C 0 0 W 0) cn rn CD 0 CL 0 0, .P O .P O O O Cl O CO O O N O O O O O O O O n A W .CD m co O co C fy CND O N (T CT a) O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O C CL to N N (D W co O O O O c o o O n C CD Go 0) A O COO C CA A O O O O O O O CA) W O c a 1 0 Sr I ll •o CD 'w c� m c CL to CD 0 o cLT'i� c°n O O O O Cl O O O O O c CL m O O O C07� fOJ� K O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 III c Cs 0 0 W 0) cn rn CD 0 0 0 0, .P O .P O O O Cl O O O O O O O O O O O O O n C fy CND O N (T CT a) O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O I ll •o CD 'w c� CA) u c 0 0 ru W c a 1 0 S;i m c CL m to CD N N O c O 0 0 0 O O a c a to to N N w O O m PP J O O O O O J m C CL Q M (D O O O O O (7i n V W 4) O d 0 0 0 O O Ol W c a 1 0 S;i L O 0 C 1 lA�■ I N O O O cn O O U) v c v m --i m c a to m PP J J i Q 1D (7i V W 4) O (T W Ol 0 0 O O O O O c CL m m :+ ao in (T w V O O Co O O O O O O O c CL � _ N m rt O N co O C" O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O L O 0 C 1 lA�■ I N O O O cn O O U) v c v m --i .th. c a 1 0 E 0) c a 1 0 Ei V N Cl O v 0 0 0 CO) c a 1 0 Sri N N O O V O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O V 0 0 'T1 0 C n CDN 0 O cn 0 0 U) m v ca C IC) G) m -I W C CL 0 CD rt O O LA O (n OVi O O O 010V)101 1 W C CL m CD Off O ON7 W O W O co O O O O O O O O W C CL CO o co 0 co owo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c w w oo �l V O O Oa 0 0 O O O O Q1 0) c a 1 0 Ei V N Cl O v 0 0 0 CO) c a 1 0 Sri N N O O V O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O V 0 0 'T1 0 C n CDN 0 O cn 0 0 U) m v ca C IC) G) m -I cn c a 0 Er N C g 0 Er C a 0 Er N c a 0 Ei y c Or i rt J O R- m A O N c CL O O O to Q m 0 C c c CL 0 U3 0 0 0 :: m 0 0 o O m O 0 o 0 0 O 0 V 0 ED c C CL 0 m 0 `C° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m c CL to W w O O n C 0 0 N C g 0 Er C a 0 Er N c a 0 Ei y c Or i rt J O R- A A O N tO O O O O Q m 0 C c c CL U3 d 0 0 :: m 0 0 o m 0 0 o 0 0 O 0 V 0 n 0 'n c 0 C . a 0 N Q Q .�1 Q X TO V CO) V m v U3 v G) m rt O O R- 00 O O tO O O O O Q 0 c c C1 d 0 0 M 0 o Ru O V V O C 0 0 n 0 'n c 0 C . a 0 N Q Q .�1 Q X TO V CO) V m v U3 v G) m E � N W O N = CoOD -40 > -► CA) CJI v0 to ."O —0.0 --0.0 CD o o o m � CT) a, a 0 CD -P6 N � �M m o vi o v, cn m ° a) CL co Q 0 3 m U) 0 =r 91) N v � n n r n� CL q� c N 0 n -I O n O C 2 n N O O .p O O X O 0 m v 00 c v G m i 68y CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 20042005 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET A,81 n stn � �w�ww, wwww�w Uww�www�wiww�w.i G I J K L M N 0 P Q 2 3 OPEIU - COLLECTIVE BARGAINING EMPLOYEES 4 EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1, 2004 5 6 1PRINCIPAL 7 CODE CLASS TITLE PAY SALARY 8 RANGE RANGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 11 329 PLANNER 37 -6 A $48,919 $51,365 $53,933 $56,630 $59,461 $62,434 12 BW $1,882 $1,976 $2,074 $2,178 $2,287 $2,401 13 H $23.519 $24.695 $25.929 $27.226 $28.587 $30.017 14 15 148 MANAGEMENT INFORMATION 37 -6 A $489-19- $51,365 $53,934 $56,630 $59,462 $62,435 16 SPECIALIST BW $1,882 $1,976 • $2,074 $2,178 $2,287 $2,401 17 H $23.519 $24.695 . $25.930 $27.226 $28.587 $30.017 18 1 19 319 IGISCOORDINATOR 37 -6 A $48,919 $51,365 $53,933 $56,630 $59,461 $62,434 20 BW $1,882 $1,976 $2,074 $2,178 $2,287 $2401 21 H $23.519 $24.695 $25.929 $27.226 $28.587 $30.017 22 23 1501 COMPUTER CRIME ANALYST 34-6 A $43,737 $45,924 $48,220 $50,631 $53,163 $55,821 24 BW $1,682 $1,766 $1,855 $1,947 $2,045 $2,147 25 1 H $21.027 $22.079 $23.183 $24.342 $25.559 $26.837 26 27 200 COLLECTIONS MANAGER 32 -6 A $39,671 $41,654 $43,737 $45,924 $48,220 $50,631 28 BW $1,526 $1,602 $1,682 $1,766 $1,855 $1,947 29 H $19.073 $20.026 $21.027 $22.079 $23.183 $24.342 30 31 70 ACCOUNTANT I 31-6 A $37,782 $39,671 $41,654 $43,737 $45,9241 $48,220 32 BW $1453 $1,526 $1,602 $1,682 $1766 $1,855 33 H $18.164 $19.073 $20.026 $21.027 $22.079 $21183 34 35 145 COMMUNICATIONS SPECIALIST 31 -6 A $37,782 $39,671 $41,654 $43,737 $45,924 $48,220 36 BW $1,453 $1,526 $1,602 $1,682 $1,766 $1,855 37 H $18.164 $19.0731 $20.026 $21.027 $22.079 $23.183 38 39 641 PLANNER 30-6 A $35,983 $37,782 $39,671 $41,654 $43,737 $45,924 40 BW $1,384 $1,453 $1,526 $1,602 $1,682 $1,766 41 H $17.299 $18.164 $19.073 $20.026 $21.027 $22.079 .42 43 90 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 29-6 A $34,269 $35,983. $37,782 $39,671 $41,654 $43,737 44 BW $1,318 $1,384 $1,453 $1,526 $1,602 $1,682 45 H $16.476 $17.299 1 $18.164 $19.073 $20.026 $21.027 46 47 65 GRANT /CONTRACT 28-6 A $32,637 $34,269 $35,983 $37,782 $39,671 $41,654 48 ADMINISTRATOR BW $1,255 $1,318 $1,384 $1,453 $1,526 $1,602 49 H $15.691 $16.476 $17.299 $18.164 $19.073 1, $20.026 50 51 601 CENTRAL SERVICES 28-6 A $32,637 $34,269 $35,983 $37,782 '$39,671 $41,654 52 1 ISPECIALIST 11 BW $1,255 $1,318 $1,384 $1,453 $1,526 $1,602 53 H $15.691 $16.476 $17.299 $18.164 $19.073 $20.026 54 55 3301 JOCCLIPATIONAL LICENSE 27 -6 A $31,083 $32,637 $34,269 $35,983 $37,782 $39,671 56 COORDINATOR BW $1,196 $1,255 $1,318 $1,384 $1,453 $1,526 57 H $14.944 $15.691 $16.476 $17.299 $18.164 $19.073 58 59 560 COMMUNICATNS OFFCR 27 -6 A. $31,083 $32,637 $34,269 $35,983 $37,782 $39,671 60 SUPERVISOR BW $1,196 $1,255 $1,318 $1,384 $1,453 $1,526 61 H $14.944 $15.691 $16.476 $17.299 $18.164 $19.073 621 11 63 563 COMMUNITY OUTREACH 27 -6 A $31,083 $32,637 $34,269 $35,983 $37,782 $39,671 64 COORDINATOR BW $1,196 $1,255 $1,318 $1,384 $1,453 $1,526 651 H $14.944 $15.691 $16.476 ° $17.299 $18.164 $19.073 A,81 n stn � �w�ww, wwww�w Uww�www�wiww�w.i CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 20042005 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET n n ,I E F G H I J K L M N 1 2 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 3 EXECUTIVE PAY PLAN 4 EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1, 2004, AMENDED WITH A 1.5% COST OF LIVING INCREASE 5 6 CODE CLASS TITLE I PAY ISALARYI 7 RANGE I RANGE 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 120 CHIEF OF POLICE 45-6 A 74,975 78,724 82,660 86,793 91,133 95,690 11 BW 2,884 3,028 3,179 3,338 3,505 3,680 12 H 36.046 37.848 39.741 41.728 43.814 46.005 13 14 130 FINANCE DIRECTOR 45-6 A 74,975 78,724 82,660 86,793 91,133 95,690 15 BW 2,8841 3,028 3,179 3,338 1 3,505 3,680 16 H 36.046 37.848 39.741 41.728 43.814 46.005 17 18 141 BUILDING, ZONING, COMMUNI 45-6 A 74,975 78,724 82,660 86,793 91,133 95,690 19 DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR BW 2,884 3,028 3,179 3,338 3,505 3,680 20 H 36.046 37.848 39.741 41.728 43.814 46.005 21 221 135 DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING 45-6 A 74,975 78,724 82,660 86,793 91,133 95,690 231 PUBLIC WORKS BW 2,884 3,028 3,179 3,338 3,505 3,680 241 H 36.046 37.848 39.741 41.728 43.814 46.005 25 26 145 CRA DIRECTOR 43 -6 A 68,005 71,405 74,975 78,724 82,660 86,793 27 BW 2,616 2,746 2,884 3,028 3,179 3,338 28 H 32.695 34.329 36.046 37.848 39.741 41.728 29 30 110 PLANNING DIRECTOR 43-6 A 68,005 71,405 74,975 78,724 82,660 86,793 31 BW 2,616 2,746 2,884 3,028 3,179 3,338 321 H 1 32.695 1 34.329 36.046 37.848 39.741 41.728 33 ,,r 34 140 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 42 -6 A 64 767 68,005 71,405 74,975 78,724 82, 35 BW 2,491 2,616 2,746 2,884 3,028 3,1 36 H 31.138 32.695 34.329 36.046 37.848 39.741 37 38 145 OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT 42-6 A 64,767 68,005 71,405 74,9751 78,724 82,660 39 BW 2,491 2,6161 2;746 2,884 1 3,028 31179 40 H 31.138 32.695 34.329 36.046 1 37.848 39.741 411 1 421 150 RECREATION DIRECTOR 42 -6 A 64,767 68,005 71,405 74,975 78,724 82,660 431 1 BW 2,491 2,616 2,746 2,884 3,028 3,179 441 1 H 31.138 32.695 34.329 36.046 37.848 39.741 45 461 150 BUILDING DIRECTOR 42 -6 A 6-4,76-7 68,005 71,405 74,975 78,724 82,660 471 1 BW 2 491 2,616 2,746 2,884 3,028 3,179 481 1 H 31.138 32.695 34.329 36.046 37.848 39.741 491 JAPPOINTED EMPLOYEES 50 FLAT RATE sit I 521 ICITYMANAGER A 110,000 126,875 531 APPOINTE BW 4,231 4,880 54 H 52.885 60.998. 55 56 CITY CLERK A 47,272 49,635 57 APPOINTE BW 1,818 1,909 58 H 1 22.7271 23.863 n n ,I CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 20042005 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BUDGET G l J I K I L I M I N O P Q 66 OPEIU - COLLECTIVE BARGAINING EMPLOYEES 67 EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1, 2004 68 69 563 DEPT. HEAD SECRETARY 26-6 A $29,603 $31,083 $32,637 $34,269 $35,983 $37,782 70 BW $1,139 $1,196 $1,255 $1,318 $1,384 $1,453 71 H $14.232 $14.944 $15.691 $16.476 $17.299 $18.164 72 73 564 ICENTRAL SERVICES 26 -6 A $29,603 $31,083 $32,637 $34,269 $35,983 $-3-7782 74 SPECIALIST i I BW $1,139 $1,1961 $1,255 $1,318 $1,384 $1,453 75 H $14.232 $14.944 $15.691 $16.476 $17.299 $18.164 76 77 210 PAYROLL TECHNICIAN 26 -6 A $29,603 $31,083 $32,637 $34,269 $35,983 $37,782 78 BW $1,139 $1,196 $1,255 $1,318 $1,384 $1,453 79 H $14.232 $14.944 $15.691 $16.476 $17.299 80 81 201 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE TECH. 26-6 A $29,603 $31,083 $32,637 $34,269 $35,983 82 BW $1,139 $1,196 $1,255 $1,318 $1,384 g7,782 83 H $14.232 $14.944 $15.691 $16.476 $17.299 84 85 608 SENIOR SITE MANAGER 26-6 A $29,603 $31,083 $32,637 $34,269 $35,983 $37,782 86 BW $1,139 $1,196 $1,255 $1,318 $1,384 $1,453 87 H $14.232 $14.944 $15.691 $16.476 $17.299 $18.164 88 89 610 RECREATION SUPERVISOR 25-6 A $28,193 $29,603 $31,083 $32,637 $34,269 $35,982 90 BW $1,084 $1,139 $1,195 $1,255 $1,318 $1384 911 H $13.554 $14.232 $14.944 $15.691 $16.475 $17.299 92 93 565 COMMUNICATIONS OFFICER 25-6 A $26,193 $29,603 $31,083 $32,637 $34,269 $35,983 94 BW $1,084 $1139 $1196 $1,255 $1,318 $1,384 95 H $13.554 $14.232 $14.944 $15.691 $16.476 $17.299 96 97 30 ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY 24-6 A $26,851 $28,193 $29,603 $31,083 $32,637 98 BW $1,033 $1,084 $1,139 $1,196 $1,255 r34,2 99 H $12.909 $13.554 $14.232 $14.944 $15.691 100 101 280 PERMIT COORDINATOR 24-6 A $26,851 $28,193 $29,603 $31,083 $32,637 102 BW $1,033 $1,084 $1,139 $1,196 $1,255 $1,318 103 H $12.909 $13.554 $14.232 $14.944 $15.691 $16.476 104 105 29 PURCHASING AGENT 23-6 A $25,572 $26,851 $28,193 $29,603 $31,083 $32,637 106 BW $984 $1,033 $1,084 $1,139 $1,196 $1,255 107 H $12.294 $12.909 $13.554 $14.232 $14.944 $15.691 108 109 25 COMMUNICATION 22 -6 A $24,354 $25,572 $26,851 $28,193 $29,603 $31083 110 RECEPTIONIST BW $937 $984 • $1,033 $1,084 $1,139 $1,196 111 H $11.709 $12.294 $12.909 $13.554 $14.232 $14.944 112 113 20 ISECRETARY 20 -6 A $22,090 $23,195 $24,354 $25,572 $26,851 $28,193 114 BW $850 $892 $937 $984 $1,033 $1,084 115 H $10.620 $11.151 $11.709 $12.294 $12.909 $13.554 116 117 605 RECREATION LEADER 20 -6 A $22,090 $23,195 $24,354 $25,572 $269851 $28,193 118 BW $850 $892 $937 $984 $1,033 $1,084 119 H $10.620 $11.151 $11.709 $12.294 $12.909 $13.554 120 121 10 RECORDS CLERK II 19-6 A $21,038 $22,090 $23,195 $24,354 $25,572 $26,851 122 BW $809 $850 $892 $937 $984 $1,033 123 H $10.115 $10.620 $11.151 $11.709 $12.294 $12.909 9 X. CODE ENFORCEMENT A. CODE ENFORCEMENT ENHANCEMENT, PROGRAM. Working with City departments, the SMCRA shall fund increased code enforcement services within the redevelopment area. The goal of this program is to, increase the marketability and aesthetics of the properties in the redevelopment area. X1. POLICE A. POLICE SUB-STATION. The Agency will (085 work with redevelopers to locate rent-free police sub-stations in key locations in the redevelopment area. Tine Agee c,/,/v1;',1'jun-,J a portion of 'police officer's salaries for specialized police activity, such as officers stationed on the trolley (trolley cops). F3 overgrown Lot in Violation of City Code U.S. Post Office REDEVELOPMENT ADVOCACY REDEVELOPMENT A A AD -_ D IT/ CID CCA. C Y. The e S IN /i C R r -, shall actively advocate for actions by other public and private bodies which are to the o" area residents. en ts. benefit 1 Examples of this type _'7 of adv ocacy work include the beautification of the U.S. Post Office and the FP&L site. P&LQ.uick Victory Landscape Improvement Site ' South Miami Community Redevelopment Plan page 44 Sent By: UTCDC; 305 627 9068; Oct -11 -04 2:25PM; Page 1/1 Universal Truth Co mmuni Develo meat Cor oration Inc. t3' p p \`i A °r�rcarr►������ Board Members Rev. Dr. Mary A.Tumpkin President Mr. John Fleming Vice President Ms. Bernice M. Kerson Secretary Mr. Chester Bishop Treasurer Directors Mr. Johnnie Adams Mr. Billy Hester Mr. Harold Hicks Mr. Eugene Simmons Ms. Monica Kennerly Staff Rose Hudson Mincey Executive Director 21310 N.W 37" Avenue '• Carol City • Florida 33056 Tel: (*) 624 -4991 a Fax: (30.5) 627 -9068 e -mail cdc- bl ossomingrose(a7utrutheenter.urg I October 11, 2004 Mr. James McCants Program Coordinator City of South Miami Community Redevelopment Group 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, Florida 33,143 Dear Mr. McCants; On behalf of the Board of Directors of the Universal Truth Community Development Corporation, we Thank your office for the recommendation to the City Commission for the City. of South Miami for the approval of the Homebuyer Education. Program proposal. ; The primary objectives for this program are as follows: 1. To provide at least for ..(40) individuals with credit counseling by November 31, 2005, and; 2. To conduct quarterly Homebuyer Education Workshops for at least two hundred (200) individuals by November 31, 2005. We look forward- to a highly successful program that empowers families to live a prosperous and healthy lifer _y Always, feel free to contact me fur additional information and on- going support at (305) 6244991. Sincerely, Rose H. Mincey Executive Director Communicated by faxing: 3) 663 -6345 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI -DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, CASE NO. 02 -17144 CA 06 Plaintiff, FLORIDA BAR NO. 284602 VS. NOTICE OF HEARING (Motion Calendar) SAM HEPBURN, EVA HEPBURN, et al., Defendants. TO: Thomas Goldstein, Esq. 2810 Stephen P. Clark Center 111 N.W. First Street Miami, Florida 33128 -1993 YOU WILL PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that undersigned will call up for hearing before the Honorable SERI BETH COHEN, one of the Judges of the above -styled Court at the Dade County Courthouse, 73 West Flagler Street, Miami, Florida 32110, at 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, the 26th day of October, 2004, or as soon thereafter as the same may be heard for PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY FINAL JUDGEMENT. The undersigned counsel hereby certifies that opposing counsel has been contacted in an attempt to resolve the issue without the: necessity of a hearing,'but the matter could. not be resolved. PLEASE BE GOVERNED ACCORDINGLY. WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and ect copy of the foregoing was mailed to the above addressees -It the above addresses this day of September, 2004. LOTT & LEVINE Attorney for Plaintiff 9155 Sout deland,Blvd., #1014 Miami, Fl i 6 Telepho 05) 670 -0700. By: GEORGE J. TT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO. 02 -17144 CA 06 Florida Bar #284602 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDVELOPMENT AGENCY, Plaintiff, VS. SAM HEPBURN, EVA HEPBURN, et al., Defendants. MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff, CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT, pursuant to Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510 moves this Court to enter a Partial Summary Judgment in its favor against the Defendant, MIAMI -DADE COUNTY, and, in support thereof, states: 1. Defendant, MIAMI -DADE COUNTY, was served with process, has withdrawn its Motion to Dismiss, and has disclaimed any right, title, claim or interest in the property which is the subject matter. of this action. (the "Property "). 2. The pleadings and exhibits filed herein, as well as Plaintiffs affidavit in support hereof, establish that; a. Plaintiff owns the Property. b. Plaintiff deraigns its title to the Property from that certain tax deed ( "Tax Deed', dated August 14, 2001, and filed in Official Records Book 19846, at Page 0295, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, wherein the Plaintiff is named as Grantee. A true copy of the Tax Deed is attached to the Complaint. c. The Tax Deed and the procedure leading to its issuance were in strict compliance with the procedure as provided for and by Chapter 197, Florida Statutes. d. Plaintiff is in actual, open and exclusive possession of the Property. e. The Defendant, MIAMI -DADE COUNTY, disclaims any right, title, claims or interest in the Property. f. Plaintiff's title to the Property is superior to, and exclusive of, any right of the Defendant in the Property. 3. Florida Statute 65.081 provides for the quieting of tax titles and has been upheld by the Florida Supreme Court in Beebe v. Richardson, 23 So.2d 718 (1945). 4. There is no genuine issue as to any material fact in this cause, and, the Plaintiff is entitled to a judgement as a matter of law against the Defendant, MIAMI -DADE COUNTY. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff moves this Court for the entry of a Partial Summary Judgment quieting title to the Property in Plaintiff as against the Defendant, MIAMI- DADE COUNTY. LOTT & LEVINE Counsel for the Plaintiff 9155 South Dadeland Blvd. Suite #1014 Miami, Flori 3156 Telephon . (3 -0700 By: G r • CASE NO. 02 -17144 CA 06 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed to: Thomas Goldstein, Esq., 2810 Stephen P. Clark Center, 111 N.W. First Street, Miami, Florida 33128 this day of September, 2004. Lott & Levine Attorney for Defendant Golson 9155 South Dadeland Boulevard Suite 1014 Miami, Florida 33156 Telephon . 05) 670 -0700 Facsim' . (305) 670- 01 By: GEORG f IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND .FOR DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 02 =17144 CC 06 CIVIL DIVISION CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,. Plaintiff, VS. SAM HEPBURN, EVA HEPBURN et al., Defendants. AFFIDAVIT OF GEORGE J. LOTT STATE OF FLORIDA) . COUNTY OF DADE } BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, a person duly authorized to take acknowledgements and administer oaths, personally appeared GEORGE ). LOTT, who after being duly sworn deposes and says: 1. That Affiant.is an attorney licensed to practice law and actively practicing in the State of Florida in Dade County. 2. That he is the attorney of record for the Plaintiff herein. 3. Affiant has examined title to the real property described in the Complaint (the "Property"), and has reviewed the Clerk's file In connection with the issuance to Plaintiff of the Tax Deed to the Property. Based on the Affiiant's examination of title and review of the Clerk's file, Afflant is able to state that a. Plaintiff owns the Property. b. Plaintiff deraigns its title to the Property from that certain tax deed ( "Tax Deed "), dated August 14, 2001, and filed in Official Records Book 19846, at Page 0295, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, wherein the Plaintiff is named as Grantee. Case No. 02 -17144 CA 06 Affidavit of George J. Lott Page 2 c. The Tax Deed and the procedure leading to its issuance were in strict compliance with the procedure as provided for .and, by Chapter 197, Florida Statutes. d. The Defendant, MIAMI -DADE COUNTY, disclaims any right, title, claims or. Interest in the Property. e. Plaintiff's title to the Property is superior to, and exclusive of, any right of . the Defendant in the Property. FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT. � . . Zt54bUL Florida SWOR T A S SCRIB D before me on 2004. NOT PUB M OMMISS N EXPI ES: Name of Notary Public � personally known or produced identification Type of Identification: ANAMARIAJUNCO uy MY COMMISSION # DD= 1pf�0�� ' EXPIRES: May7,2MS 14403.N07ARY FL Notay Savim 6 Balding, jrG . Zt54bUL "OFF. REC BK.. . 20054PGO232 '. This' instrument was prepared by:: - GEORGE J. LOTT; Esquire.. Two Datran .Center, Suite 1701 j :O IR668477 2001 DEC 04 10:08 . 9130 South Dadeland Blvd. Miami, FL 33156 DOCSTPDEE 24.00 SURTX 18.00 HARVEY RUVIH, CLERK DADE.00014TYP FL.. Property Appraisers Parcel Identification (Folio) Number: 09- 4025 = 029 -0100 W-A R R A N T Y D E E D THIS INDENTURE, made .this ; l day of November, 2001, between Dorothy M. Parker, a single woman, (GRANTOR *), and The South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency whose address is.6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida 33143, (GRANTEE *), WITNESSETH, that said Grantor, for and in consideration of the . sum of TEN DOLLARS '($10.00), and other good and valuable consideration to said Granto in hand paid by said Grantee, the r. receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has bargained and .granted, sold to said Grantee, and Grantee's heirs and :.assigns: forever, the following described land, .situate, lying and being in Miami -Dade County,.State of Florida, to wit: Lot.15, Block At TOWNSITE OF LARKINS, according to the map or plat thereof,•as recorded'in Plat . . Book :4,'Page 1, of the Public Records of Miami-' Dade County, Florida. SUBJECT T0: Conditions, •restrictions, limitations, and easements of record, if any; but any such interests that may have been terminated are not hereby reimposed; and subject to applicable zoning ordinances, taxes and assessments for.the year 2001 and: subsequent years. Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same ;against the lawful claims of all• persons whomsoever. * "Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for singular or,plural- as , context requires.. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunto set her hand and seal `.. the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed . and-_ deliv_ ered_in__-- _...------- _-- - - -._. the pr ence o Wit ss ,( l DOROTHY PARKER lei Printed: P'q// 7455 Sunset Drive : South,Miami, FL 33143 . Witness: Q *,%,.4,eZ /OY2 %c( Printed: 1 i i TAx -Lr 010 1 .l lull 1111111111 �111.1u111l1111111111 CFH 200480116860 OR BPS 22061]• Pss 2520 25211? . (..1ass) RECORDED 02/20/2004 14:42:56 HARVEY RUVIHr CLERK OF COURT? MIAMI -DADE COUNTY? FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 02 -17143 CA 15 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY_;; REDVELOPMENT AGENCY, .. Plaintiff, �,�._ {A Cr _ V5. WILFRED S. HALL SR., CLARENCE =C S. HALL, and others, g CD cn .. c Defendants. AMENDED SUMMARY FINAL JUDGMENT THIS ACTION was heard on, December _11, 2003, on the Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment. On the evidence presented, IT IS ADJUDGED THAT: 1. The title of Plaintiff, THE CI1Y OF SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, to*the following- described real property located in Miami- Dade County, Florida: Lot 54 and the West 11.25 feet of alley lying E & ADJ thereto closed per ORD 7 -79 -1029, Block 9, FRANKLIN SUBDIVISION; according to the map or plat thereof, as recorded In Plat-Book 5, ,Page 34, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida (hereinafter referred - to as the "Property "), x Is a good title against the claims or purported claims of Defendants, WILFRED S. HALL SR. and CLARENCE S. HALL, if alive, and if dead their unknown spouse, heirs,. devisees, grantees and creditors and all other parties claiming by, through, under or against them; all parties having or claiming to have any right, title or interest in the A TRUE COPY PAGE CERTIFICATION ON LAST �RVEY RUVIN, CLEhK B K 22060 PAGE 2521 I-AST PAGE Case No.- '02 -17143 'CA 15 Summary Final Judgment Property; and of all persons claiming by, through or under Defendants since the filing of the Notice of Lis Pendens; and those claims or purported claims are canceled; and the title to the Property is forever quieted in Plaintiff, The City .of South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency. 2. The court finds that the Guardian Ad Litem, Administrator Ad Litem and Attorney Ad Utem has reasonably expended four hours in representing the Defendants in this case and that $187.50 is a reasonable hourly rate for these.' services; therefore, the 'sum of $750.00 as compensation for Phillip J. Brutus, Esq., is taxed as an item of costs. All costs are. taxed against Plaintiff. 3. This Summary Final Judgment is amended to remove any reference to The City of South Miami which was included in the Judgment entered herein on December 11, 2003, because of a scrivener's error. The. sole Plaintiff in this case was, and remains, The. City of South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency. ORDERED at Miami, Miami -Dade County, Florida on Deer r� . 200 . �,o .. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF DADEr couN �r 1 HEREBY CERTIFY that the tore is a true an a r c AU g2� l the / 43 °' original on file in this office. HARVEY RUVIN, Cleric of Circuit and County Courts Deputy Clerk 8�' CIRCUIT COURT UDGE . fum y+, Copies furnished to: FEB-1 1 2004 George J. Lott, Esq. Phillip J. Brutus, Esq. CITY' OF SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY lil iilll Ilill Il1Il iillt Iltll Illti {ill fill CFN.2004RO440263 OR A365 Fss 1904 - 1905; (2P9s) RECORDED 06/03/2004 10 -27 :39 HARVEY RUVIN; CLERK OF COURT; MIAMI -DADE COUNTYr.FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF'THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 04- 03495 CA 08 REDVELOPMENT AGENCY, `. Y Plaintiff, •F`. VS.-I^ ROBIN ROLLE, as the Personal a. Representative of the Estate of .JESSE BROWN, Deceased et al.; . m o A /U iV Defendants. .•�(}t �j' de SUMMARY FINAL JUDGMENT THIS ACTION was heard on' December 11, . 2003, . on the Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment. On the evidence presented, IT IS ADJUDGED THAT: 1: The title of the Plaintiff, CITY OF. SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, to the following- described real property located in Miami -. Dade County, Florida 'The East 50 feet' of the West 150 feet, of the South 80 feet, of the North ,186 feet, of the East 1/2, of the Northwest 1/4, of the Northwest 1/4, of the Southeast 1/4, , in Section 25, Township 54- South, Range 40 East, Miami -Dade County, Florida (the "Property"),- is a good title against the claims .or purported claims of Defendants, ROBIN ROLLE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jesse Brown, Deceased, ROBIN ROLLE, Individually, ELEANOR O'HARRIS, HATTIE BROWN, YESSELYN YORK, ERIC BROWN, VANTAGE CREDIT UNION, formerly known as R A C EMPLOYEES FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, if alive, and' if dead their unknown spouse, heirs, devisees, grantees and �. �K 22365 PAGE 1905 f ST PAGE /7 Case No. 04- 03495, CA 08 ` Summary Final. Judgment creditors, and all other parties claiming by, through, under or against them; all, parties having or claiming to have any right, title or interest in the Property; and of all persons. claiming by,• through or under Defendants since the filing of the Notice of Us • Pendens; and those claims or . purported claims are canceled; and the title to the Property is forever quieted. in Plaintiff, City of South Miami Community. Redevelopment Agency. ORDERED at Miami, Miami -Dade County, Florida on June, 2004. C CUIT COURT JUDGE Copies furnished to: George J. Lott,. Esq. Vantage. Credit Union S U N 0 J �Ud% o couAf COUN a ;;TATS OF FLORIDA$ �a, . py t the to I KREBY CERTIFY that the tocegcing is o true original on iite in this oifi��qq t' COuits o „ , A• HARVEY RUVIN, cm Coww.�' pepu;y Clerk ��`Z /' • Taxing Authority NOTICE OF PROPOSED MIAMI -DADE DEPARTMENT dF PROPERTY "APPRAISAL .. 81' • 243246 A PROPERTY TAXES 111 NW 1 STREET, SUITE 710 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33128 -1984 AND PROPOSED OR ADOPTED if no budget change NON -AD IrALOREM.ASSESSMENTS DO NOT PAY change is made 17IIS IS NOT A. BILL The taxing authorities which levy property . R/E FOLIO: 09- 4025 - 010 -0020 taxes against your property will soon hold MILLAGE CODE: 0900 Public hearings to adopt budgets and tax rates for the next year. The purpose oi'these Public fiearings is to 111 NW 1 ST, .MIAMI, FL (786) 331••5321 receive opinions from the general public and 06 to answer questions on the proposed tax SOUTH ML4MI COMMUNITY change and budget Prior To Taking Final. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Action. Each taxing authority may Amcnd 6130 SUNSET DR or Alter its proposals at the hearing. MIAMI 'FL . 33143 -5040 FRANKLIN SUB.PB 5 -34 , E2FT LOT 1 BLK 1 8 W35FT LOT 14 I IIIIIIIIIItIIIIIIIII III1IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII III IIIIIt1 a 111 11 BLK 3' Property Addr: Taxing Authority Your property taxes. Your taxes this year Your, taxes this year A public hearing on the proposed taxes last year if proposed budget if no budget change and budget will be held:, change is made is made County 0.00 25.10 22.31 9/073, 5:01 PM, COMMISSION CHAMBERS 111 NW 1 ST, .MIAMI, FL (786) 331••5321 _ Public Schools: By State Law 0.0.0 15.13 14.20 9/08s 5:01 PH,. SCHOOL BOARD.AUDITORIUM By Local Board 7.32 6.55 1450 NE 2 AVE, MIAMI, FL (305) 995 -1226 South Miami 0.00 20.46, 18.10: 9/14, 6:00 PM, COMMISSION CHAMBERS 6130 SUNSET OR (305) 663 -6343. Water Management District 0.00 1.66 1.50 9/07, 5:15 PM, SFWM DIST AUDITORIUM . Everglades CP 0.00 0.28 0.25 3301.GUN CLUB RD, WPB (561) 686 -8800 Independent Special Districts* 9/08, 6:30 PM, CITY HALL, 21 S. CYPRESS ST F.I.N.O. 0.00 0.11 0.09. FELLSi4ERE, FIL (561) 627 -3386 Children's Trust 0.00 1.23 .1.23. 9/13, 5:01 PM, SCHOOL BOARD AUDITORIUM Voter Approved* 1450 NE .2 AVE, MIAMI, FL (305) 571 -5700 Debt Payments' County 0.00 0.79 0.79 REFER TO COUNTY PUBLIC HEARING ABOVE. School 0.00. 1.66. 1.66 REFER TO PUBLIC SCHOOL HEARING'ABOVE. Fire 0:00. 0.19 0.19 REFER TO COUNTY PUBLIC HEARING ABOVE. Total Property Taxes 1 0.00 66.87 * SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR EXPLANATIONS., COLUMN 1 *' �COLUMN COLUMN 3* Your property value Market Value .. Assessed Value Exemptions Taxable Value ' Se Taxable last year 2003 2775 2775 ' 2775 0 0 Your property value, this year 2004 2775 2775 0 2775 0 PROPOSED OR•ADOPTED NON -AD VALOREM ASSESSMENTS Levying Authority Purpose of Assessment Units Rate Assessment Total (This amount Is included in Total Property faxes above) 0.00 it you feel the market value of your property is inaccurate or does not retiect fair market value, or it you are entitled to an exemption that is not reflected above, contact your county property appraiser at: (305)375 74081 111 NW 1 STREET •8TIt FLOOR (8:30 AN TO 4:30:12H) If the property, appraiser's office is unable to resolve the.matter as to market value or. an exemption, you may file a petition for adjustment with the Value Adjustment Board; petition forms are available from the county property appraiser and must be filed on or before: "SEPT. 20, 2004 Your final tax bill may contain non -ad valorem assessments which may.not be reflected on this notice such as assessments for roads, drainage, PTX -8060 ;arbage, fire, lighting, water, sewer, or other governmental services and facilities which may be levied by your county, city, or any special district. R. 0712004 Taxing Authority NOTICE OF PROPOSED MIAMI -DADE DEPARTMENT. OF PROPERTY APPRAISAL. 81 243251.'A PROPERTY TAXES 111 'NW 1 STREET SUITE 710 . MIAMI, FLORIDA 33128 =1984 AND PROPOSED OR ADOPTED:..:' if no budget change NON -AD VALOREM ASSESSMENTS DO•NOT PAY change is made THIS ISWOT A BILL The taxing authorities which levy property R/E FOLIO: 09- 4025 -010 -0830 taxes against your property will soon hold MILLAGE CODE: 0900 Public Ilearings to adopt budgets and tax rates fur the next year. The purpose of these Public Hearings is to 111 NW 1•ST, MIAMI,,FL (786) 331 -5321 receive opinions from the general public and 03 to answer questions on the proposed tax SOUTH • MIAMI COMMUNITY change and budget Prior To Taldng Final REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Action. Each taxing authority may Amend 6130 SUNSET DR or Alter its proposals at the hearing. MIAMI FL, `- 33143 -5040 • FRANKLIN: SUB PS 5 -34 El /2 LOT .79 BLK 14 ' l l I I I I I I I I I LOT SIZE 25.000 x 100' tt to tut t u tt tt t Property Addr: 6016 SW 63 ST Taxing Authority Your property taxes' Your. taxes this year: Your taxes this year A public hearing on the-proposed taxes last year if proposed budget if no budget change and budga will be held: change is made is tnade County 0.00 192.70 171.29 9/07, 5 :01 PH COMMISSION CHAMBERS, 111 NW 1•ST, MIAMI,,FL (786) 331 -5321 ...PUb11C��SChOO1S:' - _ ..____...-.. -_-•._.--- --_.._....._...__..._ By State Law 0.00 116.13 109.00 9/08, 5:01..PM3. SCHOOL BOARD AUDITORIUM By Local Board 56.19 50.30 1450 NE .2 AVE, MIAMI, FL (305).995- 1226 -South Miami 0.00 157.04 138.96 9/14, 6:00 PM, COMMISSION CHAMBERS 6130.SUNSET DR (305) 663 -6343 Water Management District 0.00 12.72 11.48 9/07,'5:15..15M, SFHM DIST AUDITORIUM Everglades CP 0.00 .2.13 1.92 3301 GUN•CLLIB,RD, NPB (5611'686 -8800 Independent Special Districts' 9/08, 6:30 PM, CITY.HALL,,21 S. CYPRESS ST F.I.N.D. 0.00 0.82 0.73 FELLSMERE, FL (561) 627 73386 Children's Trust 0.00 9.46 9.4b 9/13, 5:01 PM, SCHOOL BOARD AUDITORIUM 1450 NE.2 AVE, MIAMI, FL (3051 571 -5700 Voter Approved* Debt Payments County 0.00 6.07 6.07 REFER TO.COUNTY•PUBLIC HEARING ABOVE. School 0.00' 12.72 12.72. REFER TO PUBLIC SCHOOL HEARING ABOVE. Fire 0.00 1.47 1.47 REFER TO COUNTY PUBLIC HEARING ABOVE. Total Property Taxes 0.00 71 567:45 513.40 SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR EXPLANATIONS. •' COLUMN I*, COLUMN 2 *. COLUMN�3* Your property value. Market Value Assessed Value Exemptions Taxable Value Sr. Taxable fast year. 2003 6390 6390 6390 0 0 Your property value this year 2004 21300 21300 0 21300 0 PROPOSED OR ADOP'T'ED NON -AD VALOREM ASSESSMENTS Levying Authority . Purpose of Assessment Units Rate . Assessment Total (Ills amount Is included in Total Property Taxes above) 70.00 f you feel the market value of your property is inaccurate or does not reflect fair market value, or if, you are entitled to an exemption hat is not reflected above, contact your county property appraiser at: (30S) 375 -4081 111 NW 1 STREET 8TH FLOOR (8:30 AN TO 4:30 PH) f the. property appraiser's office is unable to resolve the .matter 'as to market value or an exemption, you may file a petition for adjustment with'the.Value adjustment Board; petition forms are available from the county property appraiser and must be tiled on or before: SEPT..20 „2004 !our final tax bill may contain non -ad valorem assessments which may not be reflected on this notice such as assessments for roads, drainage, PTX -8060 arbage, fire, lighting, water, sewer,: or other governmental, services and facilities which may be levied by your county, city, or any special district, R.'0712004, MIAMI- DADE'DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY APPRAISAL. 81 111 NW.1 STREET SUITE 710 243252 A NOTICE OF PROPOSED PROPERTY TAXES MIAMI, FLORIDA 33128 -1984 AND PROPOSED OR ADOPTED Your taxes this year NON-AD ,VALOREM. ASSESSMENTS A public hearing on -the proposed taxes DO NOT PAY last year THIS IS NOT.A BILL if no budget change, The taxing authorities which levy property R/E FOLIO: 09 -4025- 010 -0850 taxes against your property will soon hold MILLAGE CODE : 0900 Public Hearings to adopt budgets and tax :. rates for the next year. 0.00 The purpose of these Public Hearings is to ' 308.97 receive opinions from the general public and 03 to answer questions on the proposed tax SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY change and budget Prior'fo Taking Final REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Action. Each taxing authority may Amend '6130 SUNSET. DR or Alter its proposals at the hearing. MIAMI FL'. 33143 -5040 FRANKLIN sus. By State Law PB 5 -34 ` �u��ttt��tttt��t�tt�tt��tt�t�t��ittt�ti���tttu��t��ntt�u�� LOT 87 LESS-S17.50FT BLK 15:, 9/08, 5:01 PM, SCHOOL BOARD AUDITORIUM Property Addr:. 6041 SW 631ST Taxing Authority Your. property taxes Your taxes this year Your taxes this year A public hearing on -the proposed taxes last year if proposed budget` if no budget change, and budget will L-c held: change is made is made County 0.00 347.57 308.97 9/07, 5:01 PM,'COMMISSION CHAMBERS 111 NW l ST, MIAMI, FL (786) 331 -5321 Public Schools: By State Law 0.00 209.46 196.61 9/08, 5:01 PM, SCHOOL BOARD AUDITORIUM By Local Board 101.35 90.73 1450 NE 2 AVE, MIAMI, FL.(305) 995 -1226, . South Miami 0.00, 283.26 250.65 9/14, 6:00 PM, COMMISSION CHAMBERS 6130 SUNSET OR (305),663 -6343 .: Water Management District 0.00 22.94 20.70 9/07, 5:15 PM, SFNM DIST AUDITORIUM Everglades CP 0.00 :3.84 3.46 3301 GUN CLUB RD, WPB (561) 686 -8800 Independent Special Districts *. 9/08, 6:30 PM, CITY HALL, 21 S. CYPRESS ST F.I.N.D. 0.00 1.48 1.31 FELLSMERE, FL - (561) 627 -3386 Children's Trust 0:00' 17.07 17.07 9/13,5:01 PM, SCHOOL BOARD AUDITORIUM Voter Approved* 1450 NE 2 AVE, MIAMI, FL (305) 571 -5700 Debt,Payments County 0.00 10.95 10:95 REFER TO COUNTY PUBLIC HEARING ABOVE. School 0.00 22.94 22.94 REFER TO PUBLIC SCHOOL HEARING ABOVE. Fire: 0.00 .2.65 2:65 REFER TO COUNTY PUBLIC HEARING ABOVE. Total Property.Taxes 0.00 1 1023.51 ' 926.04' * SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR EXPLANATIONS., . , COLUMN.I* COLUMN. 2* COLUMN 3* Your property value Market Value Assessed •Value' Exemptions : Taxable Value Sr. Taxable last year. 2003 13874 13874 • 13874 0 0 Your property value this year 2004 38419 38419 0 38419 0 PROPOSED OR ADOPTED NON =AD VALOREM ASSESSMENTS' Levying Authority Purpose of Assessment Un(ts Rate Assessment Total Crhis amount is included in Total Property Taxes above) 0:00 If you feel the market value of your property is inaccurate or does not reflect fair market value, or if you are entitled to an exemption that is not reflected above, contact your county property appraiser at: (305) 375-4081 111 I NW 1, STREET. 8TH FLOOR (8,30 AH TO 4:30 PH) If the property appraiser's -office is unable to resolve the matter as to market value or an exemption, you may file a petition for adjustment with the Value,. Adjustment Board; petition forms are available from the county property appraiser and must be filed on or before:' SEPT.. 20, 2004 . Your final tax bill may contain non-ad, valorem assessments which may not be reflected on this. notice such as assessments for roads, drainage, PTX -8060 garbage, fire, lighting, water, sewer, or other governmental services and facilities which maybe levied by your county, city, or any special district. R.'.07/2004 MIAMI -DADE DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY APPRAISAL 81 243250 A NOTICE OF. PROPOSED 111,NH 1 STREET SUITE 710 PROPERTY TAXES MIAMI, FLORIDA . 33128- 1984. AND PROPOSED OR ADOPTED NON -All VALOREM ASSESSMENTS DO A'OT PA}' THIS IS NOT A BILL The taxing authorities which levy property R/E FOLIO: 09 -4025- 010 -0820 taxes against your property will soon hold MILLAGE CODE: 0900 Public I(earings to adopt budgets and Lax . rates for the next year. The purpose of these Public Hearings is to receive opinions from the general public and 03 to answer questions on the proposed tax SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY change and budget Prior To Tasting Final REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Action. Each taxing authority may Amend 6130 SUNSET DR or Alter its proposals at the hearing. MIAMI FL 33143=5040 FRANKLIN SUB, PB 5 -34 LOTS 77 8 78 LESS N5FT OF LOT 78 I I I rtr I I III I I I u I I I I u I t t 8 LESS EXT AREA OF CURVE IN NE tr trtr t rr rr t t ri trot r rrtr a Property Addr: 6350 SW 60 AVE Taxing Authority Your property taxes Your taxes this year Your taxes this year A public hearing on the proposed taxes. last year if proposed budget if no budget change ai•id budget will•bu held.. change is made is made County' 0.00 658.25 585.13 9/07, 5:01 PMr COMMISSION CIIAI48ERS 111 NW 1 ST, MIAMI, Fl. (786) 331-5321. Public _ ... _ _.._.. : By State Law 0.00 396.68 372.34 9/08,.5:01 PM, SCHOOL BOARD AUDITORIUM By Local Board' 191.94: 171.82 1450 NE 2 AVE, MIAMI, FL'(305) 995 -1226' South Miami 0.00 536.45 474.68- 9/14, 6:00` PM,.COMMISSION'CHAMBERS 6130.SUNSET DR (305) 663 -6343 Water Management District - 0.00 '. 43.44 39.20 9/07, 5:15 PM, SFHM DIST AUDITORIUM .Everglades CP 0.00 7.28 6.56 3301 GUN CLUB RD, WPB (561) 686 -8300 Independent - : Special Districts* 9/08, 6:30 PM, CITY HALL, 21 S. CYPRESS ST. F.I.N.D. , 0.00 2.80 2.49 FELLSMERE, FL (561) 627 -3386 Children's Trust' 0.00 32.32 32.32• .9/13, 5:01 PM, SCHOOL BOARD AUDITORIUM Voter•Approved* 1.450 NE 2'AVE, MIAMI, FL (305) 571 -5700 Debt Payments County:" 0.00 20.74 20.74' REFER TO COUNTY PUBLIC HEARING ABOVE. School - 0.00 43.44 43.44 REFER TO PUBLIC SCHOOL HEARING ABOVE. Fire 0.00 5.02 5.02; REFER TO COUNTY PUBLIC HEARING ABOVE. . Total Property Taxes 0.00. 1938.36 1753.74 * SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR EXPLANATIONS. COLUMN 1* - COLUMN 2* COI,UMN 3* Vuur property. value Market Value' Assessed Value - Exemptions - Taxable Valued Sr. Taxable lastyear 2003 16169 16169• 16169 0 0 Your property value this year. 2004 72759 72759 . 0 . 72759 .. 0 ASSESSMENTS PROPOSED OR ADOPTED NON -AD VALORENI Levying Authority _ Purpose of Assessment Units Rate Assessment Total (This ammmt Is Included In Total Property,T'axes above) 0.00 n you tee► the marxet.value of your.property is inaccurate or noes not retiectiair market value, or it you are enimea to an exemption that is not reflected above, contact your county property appraiser. at: .(305Y 375 -4081, 111'NW 1 STREET 8TH 'FLOOR (8:30 AKTO 4:30 PK) If the property appraiser's office is unable to resolve the matter as to market value or an exemption, you may file a petition for adjustment with the Value Adjustment Board; petition forms are available from the county property appraiser and inust be filed on or before: SEPT. 20, 2004 Your final tax bill may contain non -ad valorem assessments which may not be reflected on this notice'such as assessments for roads, drainage, PTX -8060 garbage, fire, lighting, water, sewer, or other governmental services and facilities which may. be levied by your county, city, or any special district.. R. 0712004 'APPRAISAL NOTICE OF PROPOSED MIAMI -OADE DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY 11 243248 A PROPERTY TAXES 111 NW 1 STREET . . SUITE 710 .MIAMI, FLORIDA . 33128 -1984 AND'PROPOSED OR ADOPTED if no budget change NON -AD VALOREM ASSESSMENTS DO "NOT PAY change is made THIS IS NOT A BILL . The taxing authorities which levy property - 'R/E FOLIO: 09- 4025 -010 -0270. taxes against your property will soon hold MILLAGE CODE: 0900 Public Hearings to adopt budgets and tax rates for the next year. The purpose of these Public flearings is to 111•NW.1'STr MIAMI, FL (786) 331- 5321 receive opinions from the general public and 06 to answer questions on the proposed tax SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY change and budget Prior To Taking Final REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.. Action. Each taxing authority may Amend 6130 SUNSET DR or Alter its proposals at the hearing. MIAMI. FL 33143 -5040 FRANKLIN SUB PB 5 -34 LOT 27 LESS W40FT BLK S.& W15FT tt tttt t tt OF• LOT 40 BLK 7 'AKA. P 19 -2',' tt tit tut t tt tt t t tt tttn ttu Property Addr: 5944 SW 64 ST Taxing Authority Your property taxes Your taxes this year. Your taxes this year A public,hearing on the proposed taxes last year if proposed budget if no budget change and - budget will be held: change is made is made - county 0.00 515.22 457.99 9/07, 5:01,13113, COMMISSION CHAMBERS _ 111•NW.1'STr MIAMI, FL (786) 331- 5321 Public Schools: By State Law 0.00 310.49 291.44 9/08, 5:01 PM, SCHOOL BOARD AUDITORIUM. By Local Board 150.23 134.49 1450 NE 2 AVE, MIAMI, FL (305) 995 -1226 South Miami' 0.00 419.89 371.54 9/143. 6:00 PM,.COMMISSION CHAMBERS _ 6130 SUNSET;DR (305) 663 -6343 Water Management District" 0.00 34.00 30.68 9/07, 5:15 PM, SFWM DIST AUDITORIUM Everglades CP 0.00 5.70 5.13 3301 GUN CLUB RD: WPB (561) 686 -8800' Independent Special `Districts* 9/08, 6:30 PH)" CITY HALL, 21 S. CYPRESS ST F.I.N.O. 0.00 2.19" 1.95 FELLSMERE,.FL (561) 627 - 3386_ " Children's Trust 0.00 25.30 25.30' 9/13, 5:01 PM, SCHOOL BOARD AUDITORIUM Voter. Approved* 1450 NE 2 AVE, MIAMI, FL 1305).571-5700 Debt .Payments, County 0.00 16.23 16.23, REFER TO COUNTY PUBLIC HEARING ABOVE. School 0.00 34.00 34.00 REFER TO PUBLIC SCHOOL.HEARING ABOVE. Fire .0.00 3.93 3.93 REFER TO COUNTY.PUBLIC HEARING ABOVE. Total Property Taxes 0.00 1517.18 1372.68 SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR EXPLANATIONS. Taxable Value Sr. Taxable COLUMN 1* COLUMN 2* COLUMN 3* Your property value Market Value Assessed Value Exemptions last year. • 2003 ' 55002 55002 55002 0 ,' 0 Your property value this year 2004 `. 56950 56950. 0 56950 0 I'ROPOSED;OR ADOPTED NON -AD VALOREM ASSESSMENTS Levying Authority Purpose of Assessment Units Rate Assessment . Total ('Phis amount Is Included In Total Property Tams above) 0.00 If you feel the market value of your property is inaccurate or does not reflect fair market value, or if you are entitled to an exemption that is not reflected above, contact you[ county property appraiser at: .(305) 375 -4081 '111; NW 1 STREET: 8TH FLOOR (8:30 AM TO 4:30 PN) If the property appraiser's office is unable to resolve the matter as to market value or an exemption, you may rile a petition for adjustment with the Value Adjustment Board; petition forms are available from the county property appraiser and must be filed on or before:' SEPT. 20, 2004 Your final tax bill may contain non -ad valorem assessments which may not be reflected on this notice such as assessments for roads, drainage, PTX -8060 garbage, fire, lighting, water,, sewer, or other governmental, services and facilities which may be levied by. your county, city, or any special district. R. 0712004 Taxing Authority NOTICE OF PROPOSED MIAMI -DADE DEPARTMENT ,OF PROPERTY. APPRAISAL 81 243245 A PROPERT'Y.TAXES 11r NW 1 STREET sulrE: 710. MIAMI, FLORIDA 33128 =1984 AND PROPOSED. OR. ADOPTED . NON -AD VALOREM ASSESSMENT'S. County' DO NO 7'. 11A 1, 106.75 THIS IS NO T A BILL. 9/07., 5:01 PM, COMMISSION CHAMBERS The taxing authorities which levy property R/E FOLIO: 09- 4025 - 010 -0010 taxes against your property will soon hold MILLAGE CODE: ' 0900 Public hearings to adopt budgets and tax Public Schools: rates for the next year. The purpose of these Public Hearings is to receive opinions from the general public and 06 to answer questions on the proposed tax SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY change and budget Prior. To Taking Final REDEVELOPMENT- AGENCY Action. Each taxing authority may Amend 6130 SUNSET DR or Alter its proposals at the hearing. MIAMI FL 33143 -5040 FRANKLIN SUB PB 5 -34 0.00 P 20 -3 AKA LOT 1 LESS'EZFT.BLK 1: tt tit ttti i tt tt i uit tt itttt t LOT SIZE 5900 SQUARE' FEET tt i ttti tt Property Addr: 5978 SW 64 ST. Taxing Authority Your property taxes Your taxes this year Your taxes this year A public hearing on the proposed taxes last year if proposed budget change is made if no budget change'. is made . and budget will be Lelu:.. County' 0.00 106.75 94.89 9/07., 5:01 PM, COMMISSION CHAMBERS 111 NW 1.ST, MIAMI, FL (786) 331 -5321 Public Schools: By,State Law .0.00 64.33 60.39 9/08, 5:01 PM, SCHOOL BOARD AUDITORIUM By' Local. Board 31.13 27.87 1450.NE 2 AVE, MIAMI, FL (305) 995 -1226 South Miami 0.00 87.00• 76.98 9/14,'6:00 PM, COMMISSION CHAMBERS 6130 SUNSET OR (30S) 663 -6343 Water Management. District. , 0.00 7.04 6.36 9/071, 5:15 PM, SFWM DIST AUDITORIUM _ Everglades CP .0.00 1.18 " 1.06. 3301 GUN CLUB RD, WPB, (561) 686 -8800 Independent Special Districts 9/083. 6:30 PM, CITY HALL, 21 S. CYPRESS ST F.I.N.D. 0.00 0.45 0.40 FELLSMERE, FL (561) 627 -3386 Children's'Trust 0.00 5.24 5.24 - 9/13, 5:01 PM, SCHOOL 'BOARD AUDITORIUM Voter Approved* 1450`NE 2 AVE, MIAMI, FL (305) 571 -5700 Debt Payments: County 0.00 3.36 3.36 REFER TO•COUNTY•PUBLIC HEARING ABOVE. School 0.00 7.04 7.04: REFER TO PUBLIC SCHOOL HEARING ABOVE. Fire 0.00 0.81 0.81 REFER TO COUNTY PUBLIC HEARING ABOVE.: Total Property Taxes 0.00 314.33 284.40 * SEE REVERSE SIDE' FOR EXPLANATIONS. • . COLUMN 1* COLUMN 2* • COLUMN 3 *. Your property value A4arket Value, Assessed'Value Exemptlons 'fixable. Value Sr. Taxable, last year. . 2003, 11800 11800 11800 G 0 Your property value this Year 2004 11800 11800 0 11800. 0 P12OPOSED OR'ADOPTLD NON -AD VAWRENI ASSESSMENTS Levying Authority Purpose of Assessment Linits Rate Assessment Total (This, amount Is included In Total Property Taxes above) 0.00 II. you Iee1 tlic marKBt Value of your property is Inaccurate or ttoes not reriect,tair marxet value, or it you are enuuea to an exemption,. that is not reflected above; contact your county property;appraiscr, at:' (305) 375 -4081s 111, NW 1 STREET 8TH FLOOR (8:30 AN ,TO 4:30 PH) If the . ro ert appraiser's office is unable p p y pp a to resolve the matter as to market value or an exemption, you may file a petition for adjustment -.with the Value . Adjustment Board-, petition forms are available from the county property appraiser and must be filed on or before: SEPT. 20,.2004. Your final tax bill may contain non -ad valorem assessments. which may not be reflected on this notice such as assessments for roads, drainage, PTX -8060 garbage, fire, lighting, water, sewer, or other governmental services and facilities which may be levied by your county, city,,orr any special district. R. 07/2004 MIAMI- DADE.DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY,APPRAISAL 81 111 NW 'l STREET, SUITE 710 MIAMI, FLORIDA.. 33128 -1984 243249 a NOTICE OIL' PROPOSED PROPERTY TAXES AND PROPOSED, OR ADOPTED D. NON -AD VALOREM ASSESSMENTS DONOTPAY 7HIS IS NOT A BILL The taxing authorities which levy property, R/E:. FOLIO: 09- 4025 -010 -0280 taxes against your property will soon hold MILLAGE CODE: 0900 Public hearings to adopt budgets'and tax rates for the next year. - The purpose of these Public liearings is to receive opinions from the general public and 06' to answer questions on the proposed tax SOUTH . MIAMI COMMUNITY . change and budget Prior To Taking Final REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Action. Each taxing authority may Amend . 6130 SUNSET DR" or Alter its proposals at the hearing. MIAMI FL 33143- 5040: FRANKLIN SUB PB 5 -34 P 19-3 AKA'W40FT LOT 27 BLK 5 l (� LOT SIZE 20007SQUARE:FEET t I I I I I III t I I I I I I n I I I t t l i l I t I I I I I Property , Addr:'' 6401 SW 59 PL` Taxing Authority Your property taxes Your taxes this year Your, taxes this year A public hearing on the proposed taxes last year if proposed budget if no budget chan;c ttnd budget W;ll beheld: change is made is made . County 0.00 27.15 24.13 9/07, 5 :01 PM, COMMISSION CHAMBERS 111 NW,1 ST, MIAMI, FL (786) 331 -5321 Public Schools: - -, By State Law 0.00 16.36 15.35 9/08,,5:01 PM, SCHOOL BOARD AUDITORIUM By Local.Board 7.91 7.08. 1450 NE 2.AVE, MIAMI, FL (305) 995 -1226 South Miami 0.00' 22.12 19.57' 9/14, 6:00 PMs'COMMISSION CHAMBERS 6130 SUNSET DR (305) 663 -6343 Water.Management- District '0.00 1.79. 1.62 9/07,,5:15 PM, SFWM DIST AUDITORIUM Everglades CP '.0.00 0.30 0.27.: 3301 GUN CLUB RD, WPB (561) 686 -6800 Independent'' - Special Districts* 9/081. 6:30'PMr CITY HALL, 21 S..CYPRESS ST F.I.N.D. 0.00 0.12 0.10 FELLSMERE, FL.' '(561) 627 -3386 Childron's Trust .0.00- .1.33 1.33 9/13,,5:01 PM, SCHOOL BOARD AUDITORIUM Voter Approved* 1450 NE 2 AVE, MIAMI, FL (305) 571 -5700 Debt Payments County 0.00 , .0.86 ' 0.86 REFER TO.000NTY'PUBLIC HEARING ABOVE. School 0.00 1.79 1.79. REFER TO PUBLIC SCHOOL HEARING ABOVE. Fire 0.00 0.21. 0.21`. REFER TO COUNTY PUBLIC HEARING,ABOVE. Total Property Taxes 0.00 79.94- 72.31 * SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR EXPLANATIONS. COLUMN 1 *. COLUMN 2* COLUMN 3* Your property value Market Value Assessed Value Exemptions Taxable-Value: Sr. Taxable last year 2003 '' 3000 3000 3000 0 0 Your property value this year. . 2004 3000 3000. 0. 3000 0. PROPOSED OR ADOPTED NON -AD VAhORE1v1 ASSESSMENTS Levying Authority Purpose of Assessment Units' Rate Assessment Total (flits amount Is included In Total,Property Taxes above) •'• 0700 11 yUu rem LnC IIIAMUL VaIUC UI yUUL Pl UpeLLy 1J 117d"LAIULC Ur UUCS allL reI1CUL Ialr marKCL VUIUC, or n you are emmeci to an exemption that is not reflected above, contact your county property appraiser at: (305) 375 -4081 • 111 NW 1 STREET 8TH FLOOR.' (8:30 AM TO 4.30 PM) If the property appraiser's office is unable to. resolve the matter as to market value or an exemption, you may rile a petition for adjustment with the Value Adjustment Board; petition forms are available from the county property appraiser and ntust' be filed on or before: SEPT. 20, 2004 Your final tax bill may contain non -ad valorem assessments. which may not be reflected on this notice.such as assessments for roads, drainage, PTX -8060 garbage, fre, lighting; water; sewer, or other governmental services and facilities which may be levied by,your county, city, or any special district. R. 07/2004 Taxing Authority NOTICE Or PROPOSED { MIAMI -DADE DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY APPRAISAL 81 243254 A PROPERTY TAXES 111 NW 1 STREET , - SUITE . 710 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33128 -1984 AND PROPOSED OR- ADOPTED if no budget change NON -AI) VALOREM ASSESSMENTS DO AtOT PAY change is trade THIS IS NOT.A BILL . The taxing authorities which levy property' R/E FOLIO: 09-4025-065-0090' taxes against your property will soon hold MILLAGE CODE: 0900 Public Ifearings to adopt budgets and tax rates for the next year: The purpose of these Public 1lcaringq is to 111 N14 1 ST, MIAMI, FL (.786) 331 -5321 receive opinions from the general,public and 03 to answer questions on the proposed tax SOUTH' MIAMI COMMUNITY. change and budget Prior To Taking Final 'REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. Action. Each taxing authority may Amend. 6130 SUNSET DR or Alter its proposals at the hearing. MIAMI FL' 33143=5040 25 5440 0.113 AC ' UNIVERSITY GONS SUB NO 4 . IitII till•tittlltlttlttII I ItllttttI IIItttitII II titI II - PB l03 47 Property Addr:I/ Acart A;W r sS South Miami _ Taxing Authority Your property taxes Your taxes this year Your taxes this year, A public hearing on the proposed taxes last year if proposed budget if no budget change aad budget v 11 be held: change is trade is made County 0.00 1.81 '1.61 9/07, 5:01 PM, COMMISSION CHAMBERS 111 N14 1 ST, MIAMI, FL (.786) 331 -5321 Public Schools: By State Law. 0.00 1.09 1.02 9/08, 5:01 PM, SCHOOL BOARD AUDITORIUM By Local Board 0.53. 0.47 1450 NE 2.AVE, MIAMI, FL1305) 995 -1226 South Miami 0.00 1.47 1.30 9/14, 6:00 PM, CDMMISSION.CHAMBERS.' 6130.SUNSET.DR (305) 663 -6343 Plater. Management District 0.00 0.12 0.11 9/07, 5:15 PM,'SFPIM DIST.AUDITORIUM Everglades CP 0.00 0.02 0.02 3301 GUN CLUB RO, PIPB (561) 686 -8800 Independent Special Districts*''. 9/08, 6:30-PH, CIT! HALL, 21 S. CYPRESS ST, F.I.N.D. 0.00 0.01 0.01 FELLSMERE, FL (561') 627 -3386 Children's Trust..' 0.00 0.09 0.09 9/13, 5:01 014, SCHOOL BOARD AUDITORIUM Voter Approved 1450. NE 2 AVE, MIAMI, FL'(305).571 -5700 Debt Payments County DAD 0.06 0.06 REFER TO COUNTY. PUBLIC HEARING ABOVE. School 0.00 0.12 0:12 REFER TO PUBLIC SCHOOL HEARING ABOVE. Fire 0.00 0.01 0.01 REFER TO COUNTY•.PUBLIC HEARING ABOVE. Total Property Taxes 0.00 5.33 4.82 * SEE REVERSE,SIDE FOR EXPLANATIONS.' COLUMN 1* COLUMN 2* . COLUMN. 3* Your property value. Market Value Assessed Value - Exemptions Taxable Value ` ' Sr. Taxable last yar. 2003. 200 " 200 200 . 0 ; 0. Your property value this year. 2004 '200 200 ; 0. 200 0 PROPOSED OR ADOPTED NON -AD VALOREM ASSESSMENTS' f,evying Authority Purpose of Assessment Units Rate Assessment Total (This amount is included in Total Property Taxes above) 0.00 it, you leer the marKet value or your property is inaccurate or aoes not reuect tatr. marKet.varue, or it you are enuttca to an exemption that is not reflected above, contact your county property appraiser at: (305) 375 -4081 111 NW 1 STREET 8TH FLOOR. (8:30 AH TO 4:30 PH) If the property appraiser's office is unable to resolve the matter as to market value or an'exemption, you may file a petition for adjustment with the Value Adjustment Board; petition forms are available froMthe county property appraiser and must be filed on or before: SEPT. 20, 2004 Your final tax bill may contain non -ad valorem assessments which may not be reflected on this notice such as assessments for roads, drainage, P.TX -8060 garbage, fire, lighting, water; sewer, or other governmental services and facilities which may be levied by your county; city, or any special district. R. 07/2004 Taxing Authority NOTICE OF PROPOSED MIAMI -DAOE DEPARTMENT: OF'PROPERTY APPRAISAL . 81 " 243247 A PROPERTY TAXES 111 NW • I STREET. SUITE 710 . MIAMI, FLORIDA. 33128 -1984 AND PROPOSED OR ADOPTED ' . NON-AD VALOREM ASSESSMENT'S DO NOTPA Y change is made THIS IS NOT A BILL - The taxing authorities which levy property R/E FOLIO: 09- 4025 -010 -0140, taxes against your property will soon hold " MILLAGE CODE: 0900 Public Hearings to adopt budgets and tax rates for the next year. fhe purpose of these Public learings is.to 111 M.1 ST, MIAMI, FL (786) 331 -5321 receive opinions from the general public ani 06 to answer questions on the proposed tax SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY change and budget Prior To Taking Final REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Each taxing authority may Amend 6130 SUNSET DR or Alter its proposals at the hearing. MIAMI'FL 33143 -5040 34 FRANKLIN SUB PB 5 - P.20.4 AKA LOT 14 LESS W35FT IIIIIIIoilttttlltl, lttttlttll & zoF 8 LESS BEG 35FTE TS OF NW. tlt1llttltltllttttlttllltttttlltl Property ,Addr:./a can + no= Addrass Taxing Authority Your property taxes Your taxes this year Your taxes this year. A public hearing on the proposed taxes last year if proposed budget if no budnot r.Itnnoc: and budget will be held change is made is made County. 0.00. 42.17 37.48. 9/071, 5:01 PMs COMMISSION CHAMBERS . 111 M.1 ST, MIAMI, FL (786) 331 -5321 Pt,tblic Schools: By State Law 0.00 25.41 23.85 9/08; 5:01 PM, SCHOOL BOARD AUDITORIUM By Local Board 12.30, 11.01 1450 NE 2.AVE., MIAMI, FL (305) 995 -1226 South Miami 0.00 '34.37 30.41 9/14, 6:00 PM,�,COMMISSION CHAMBERS . 6130 SUNSET DR (305) 663 -6343 Water Management District'' 0.00 2.78 2.51 9/07, 5:15 PM, SFWM DIST AUDITORIUM Everglades CP 0.00 0.47 0.42 3301 GUN CLUB AD, WPB (561) 686 -8800 Independent Special Districts* 9/08, 6:30 PM, CITY HALL, 21 S. CYPRESS ST F.I.N.D. 0.00 0.18 0.16 FELLSMERE, FL (561) 627 -3386 Children's Trust 0.00 2.07. 2.07' 9/13, 5:01 PM, SCHOOL BOARD AUDITORIUM Voter Approved* . 1.450 NE 2 AVE, MIAMI, FL.(305) 571 -5700 Debt•Payments County' 0.00„ 1.33 1.33. REFER TO COUNTY PUBLIC HEARING ABOVE. School 0.00 2.78 2.78 REFER TO PUBLIC SCHOOL HEARING ABOVE. Fire .,0.00 0.32• 0.32 REFER TO COUNTY;PUBLIC HEARING ABOVE. Total Property Taxes L 0.00 124.18 112.34" SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR EXPLANATIONS. COLUMN I* . COLUMN 2*. COLUMN 3* Your property value Market Value Assessed Value Exemptions. Taxable Valuo Sr. Taxable Iasi year 2003 4661 4661' 4661 0 0 Your property value this year 2004 4661 4661 0 4661 0 PROPOSED OR ADOPTED NON -AD VALOREM ASSESSMENTS Levying Authority Purpose of Assessment Units Rate Assessment - Total (This amount Is Included In Total Property Taxes above) 0.00 If you feel the market value of your property is inaccurate or does not reflect fair market value, or if you are entitled to an exemption' :hat is not reflected above, contact your county property appraiser at: (305) 375 -4081 : 111 NW 1 STREET 8TH FLOOR',(8:30 AM TO 4:30 PM) 'f the property appraiser's office is unable to resolve the matter as,lo market value or an exemption, you may file a petition for adjustment with the Value kdjustment Board; petition forms are available from the county property appraiser and must be filed on or before:, SEPT. 20, 2004 Your final tax bill may contain non- ad,valorem assessments which may not be reflected on this notice such as assessments for roads, drainage, PTX -8060 ;arbage, fire, lighting, water, sewer, or other governmental services and facilities which may be levied by your county, city, or any special district. R. 07/2004 l'J 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 4 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ( SMCRA) 5 RELATING TO AGREEMENTS; AUTHORIZING THE 6 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO ISSUE A PURCHASE ORDER 7 IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $48,750.00; CHARGING 8 THE AMOUNT TO CASH CARRY OVER; PROVIDING AN 9 EFFECTIVE DATE. 10 11 WHEREAS, the SMCRA requires a consultant to amend the interlocal 12 agreement between the SMCRA and Miami -Dade County, for the continued 13 existence of the CRA; and 14 15 WHEREAS, Iler Planning Group was originally recommended' as a sole 1.6 source provider to create a master plan and provide services to perform the re- 17 application process for the continuance of the SMCRA in an amount not to exceed 18 $118,150; and, 19 20 WHEREAS it has been determined that a master plan is not required at this 21 time, thus the scope of consulting services have been modified and reduced; and 22 23 WHEREAS, in the interest of time, it is essential for the Iler Planning 24 Group to immediately commence consulting services for the re- application 25 process; and 26 27 WHEREAS, the agreement, which was approved as to form and which 28 contains the terms and conditions previously negotiated with the Iler Planning 29 Group on September 30, 2004, shall be amended to reflect the current reduced 30 scope of work and reduced price term of $48,750.00; and, 31. 32 33 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMUNITY 34 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY. OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 35 THAT: 36 37 Section 1. The executive director is authorized to issue a purchase order 38 to the Iler Planning Group to immediately begin providing consulting services for 39 the SMCRA for an amount not to exceed $ 48,750.00 charging the amount to the 40 cash carry over fund. 41 Additions shown by underlining and deletions shown by e er . I Section 2. Attached as exhibit 1 is the amended Iler agreement, which 2 contains all previously approved terms and conditions, and reflects the amended 3 scope of services and price term. 4 5 Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. 6 7 PASSED and ADOPTED this day of October, 2004. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTEST: City of South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency Clerk READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: Eve A. Boutsis, General Counsel APPROVED: Chairperson Mary Scott Russell Board Vote: Chairperson Russell: Vice Chairperson Palmer: Board Member Wiscombe: Board Member Birts- Cooper: Board Member Sherar: Board Member Bryan: Board Member Cobb: JAMy Documents \Resolutions \CRA Resolution Authorizing Purchase Ordcr - Ilcr Planning Group - 10.14.04.doc Page 2 of 2 1 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2 3 THIS AGREEMENT is made this day of October 2004, by and 4 between ILER PLANNING GROUP (hereinafter the "Consultant"), and the CITY OF 5 SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (hereinafter the 6 "CPA "). 7 WHEREAS, the Consultant has been awarded a sole source public bid for 8 assistance in the CRA renewal process; and 9 WHEREAS, the Consultant and City, through mutual negotiation, have agreed 10 upon a scope of services, schedule and fee for said services contained in attached 11 Exhibits "A" and "B" (hereinafter the "Project'); and 12 WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the Consultant to perform the services 1.3 specified in the approved Scope of Services under the terms of this agreement; 14 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of $10.00, the mutual promises 15 and covenants contained in this agreement, and for other good and valuable 16 consideration, the receipt and legal sufficiency of which is acknowledged by both parties, 17 the parties agree as follows. 18 1. Whereas Clauses. The above whereas clauses are incorporated and made 19 a part of this agreement. 20 2. Professional Services. The Consultant shall furnish services to the City in 21 the performance of the Scope of Services contained in Exhibit "A." Page 1 of 13 IPG SMCRA 1 3. Period of Service. The Consultant shall begin work promptly after receipt 2 of a fully- executed copy of this Agreement from the CRA and complete the Project 3 within the projected project schedule provided in Exhibit "A." CRA and Consultant agree 4 that the estimated completion timeframes in Exhibit "A" are susceptible to unavoidable 5 and unexpected delays due to such events as local review and meetings, and State review 6 process. Thus, through mutual verbal agreement,on an as needed basis, these timeframes 7 may be modified by the parties. The Consultant's receipt of, a fully- executed copy of 8 this Agreement shall constitute written notice to proceed with the Project. With respect to 9 the specified schedule, performance shall be timely under this Agreement. However, the 10 completion timeframes shall be extended for periods of delay resulting from strikes, 1.1 natural disasters, and similar circumstances over which the Consultant has no control, if 12 the CRA approves such extensions. 13 4. Compensation. For the completion of the Scope of Services for Tasks 1 14 through 5 described in Exhibit "A," the Consultant will be paid total compensation of an 15 amount not to exceed $48,750.00 by the CRA. The total compensation for Tasks 1 16 through 5 (total not to exceed amount $48,750.00) shall be invoiced by the Consultant on 1.7 progress completion (10 %) basis and paid by the CRA until the Project is complete, 18 consistent with the schedule and estimated cost of the subject Tasks as presented in 19 Exhibit "A." It is also understood by both parties that Consultant may be requested to 20 perform additional services as described in Task 6 of Exhibit "A," and that, if such 21 services are requested by the CRA and performed by the Consultant, .these services will Page 2 of 13 IPG SMCRA I be invoiced by the Consultant on progress completion (10 %) basis and paid by the CRA 2 until the Project is complete and contained in Exhibit "A," at the hourly labor rates 3 identified in Exhibit "A." 4 5. Modifications — Change Orders. The CRA may, at any time, by written 5 change order make changes to the means and methods of performing the work under 6 Task 6 in the scope of work attached as Exhibit "A." The CRA may order temporary 7 stoppage of the work or delay in performance that does not alter the scope of work. 8 Changes, including any increase or decrease in the amount of the Consultant's 9 compensation, shall be incorporated in written amendments to this Agreement. 10 If any change causes an increase or decrease in the price charged, the maximum 11 amount of the Agreement, or the time required for performance of any part of the work 12 under this Agreement, or otherwise affects the conditions of this Agreement, the CRA 13 shall make an equitable adjustment to the maximum amount, the price(s), the delivery 14 schedule, or other affected terms, and shall modify the contract with a written change 15 order. 16 6. Subcontractors. The Consultant plans to utilize the following 17 subcontractor in the completion of the Project on an as- needed basis: Equity Investment 1.8 Analysts, Inc., which shall be used to develop section 5 and 6 of Task 4 of Exhibit "A." 19 Consultant shall obtain prior written approval, which approval will not be unnecessarily 20 denied, of the CRA director prior to utilizing any additional or substitute contractors. Page 3 of 13 IPG SMCRA 1 7. Liens. The contractor, subcontractors, suppliers and laborers 2 ( "subcontractors ") are prohibited from placing a lien on CRA's property. Consultant 3 shall execute a similar contract with subcontractors confirming that subcontractors are 4 not prohibited from placing liens on CRA's property. Further, both contractor and 5 subcontractor warrant not to file or record liens or notices of liens against CRA property. 6 8. Invoices. Invoices will be submitted by the Consultant to the CRA on a 7 monthly basis. Payment of each such invoice shall be sent to the Consultant within 30 8 days of receipt of the invoice by the CRA pursuant to section 218.74, Fla. Stat. 9 9. Term. Term of this agreement shall be for a period of one.year from the 10 date of execution shown in the first paragraph of this Agreement, unless terminated 11 earlier pursuant to paragraphs 11 -13 below. 12 10. Renewal of Agreement. Consultant has the option to extend or renew this 13 agreement for up to two additional one year terms, provided Consultant obtains the prior 14 written consent of the CRA's contracting officer as to each option's exercise. To 15 exercise the option(s) Consultant, 60 days prior to the expiration of the initial term, or 16 any renewal term, is to request, in writing, the ability to exercise her option rights under 17 this agreement. The CRA, prior to the termination of the initial, or any renewal term, will 18 provide instructor with timely notice of its concurrence or denial of the option request. 19 11. Termination for Convenience. The CRA may terminate this agreement 20 for convenience at any time by giving 30 days notice in writing to the Consultant. The 21 Consultant will be paid for the value of services performed pursuant to the schedule Page 4 of 13 IPG SMCRA I contained in the statement of work, up to and including the termination date. Consultant 2 will be permitted to complete on -going assignments and shall be paid for all satisfactory 3 work completed. The CRA shall not be liable for future profits or losses. 4 In the event that the CRA improperly terminates the agreement for default under 5 paragraph 9, the termination shall be deemed a termination for convenience under this 6 paragraph. 7 12. Termination. for Lack of Funds. Not withstanding any other provisions of 8 the agreement, if the funds anticipated by the CRA for the for the payment of work under 9 this agreement are at any time not forthcoming, through the failure of the CRA to 10 appropriate funds, the failure of Miami -Dade County, the Florida Legislature, or the U.S. 11 Congress to appropriate funds, or the refusal of the administrative branch of the federal or 12 county government to release funds, or due to any other reason for the unavailability of 13 funds in succeeding fiscal years, or the discontinuance or material alteration of the program 1.4 under which funds are to be provided, the CRA shall have the right to terminate the 15 agreement without penalty by giving not less than 10 days written notice of the lack of 16 available funding. 17 In the event the CRA declines to appropriate funds for payment of the agreement for 18 future fiscal years, Consultant shall be paid for work performed under the agreement with 19 funds that are appropriated for the current fiscal year. The liability of the CRA to 20 Consultant shall be limited to the obligation to budget and appropriate funds for work 21 performed during the current fiscal year. . Page 5 of 13 IPG SMCRA 1 For any portion'' of the work that is funded by county, state or federal 2 appropriations or grants, the liability of the CRA to Consultant shall be limited to 3 payment for services when payment is received by the CRA from the county, state or 4 federal authority. The CRA shall submit all required documents requesting payment 5 within a reasonable time. The CRA shall not be liable to Consultant for work performed 6 in the, event that payment is not received by the CRA from a county, state or federal 7 funding authority. This is a pay- when -paid clause. 8 13. Termination for Default. Either party may terminate this agreement prior 9 to the expiration of the initial term or any subsequent renewal term on account of a 10 material breach of this agreement by the other party, which has not been cured within 30 11 days from the date of receipt of written notice of breach from the party seeking 12 termination. 13 ,Termination shall be effective as of the end of the notice period in the case of any 14 uncured material breach. 15 Consultant may terminate this agreement prior to the expiration of the initial term. 1.6 or any subsequent renewal term upon not less than 60 days prior written notice to the 17 CRA in the event that Consultant is unable to complete the services identified in 18 paragraph 2 and attached Exhibit "A" due to causes beyond Consultant's control. 19 The CRA shall have no liability to the Consultant for future profits or losses in the 20 event of termination for default. 21 The rights and remedies of the CRA provided in this provision shall not be Page 6 of 13 IPG SMCRA I exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under 2 this agreement. 3 14. Insurance and Indemnification. The CRA shall not be held liable or 4 responsible for any claims, which may result from acts, errors or omissions of the 5 Consultant or its subcontractors, suppliers or laborers. In reviewing, approving or 6 rejecting any submissions or acts of the Consultant, the CRA in no way assumes 7 responsibility or liability for the acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant or 8 subcontractors. 9 The Consultant shall not commence work under this agreement until it has 10 obtained all insurance required by the CRA for Consultant and all subcontractors. The 11 Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the CRA harmless from any and all claims, 12 liability, losses,. expenses and causes of action arising solely out of a negligent act, error, 13 or omission or misconduct of the Consultant, or the Consultant's' subcontractors, 14 suppliers and laborers incident to the performance of the Consultant's services under.this 15 agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims, losses, fines, penalties, costs and 16 expenses of any nature whatsoever resulting from its intentional misconduct or 17 negligence. 1.8 The Consultant shall maintain during the term of this agreement the following 19 insurance: 20 A. Professional Liability Insurance in the amount of $500,000.00 with 21 deductible per claim. if any, not to exceed 5% of the. limit of liability Page 7 of 13 IPG SMCRA 1 providing for all sums which the Consultant shall become legally obligated to 2 pay as damages for claims arising out of the services performed by the 3 Consultant or any person employed by him in connection with this 4 agreement. This insurance shall be maintained for three years after 5 completion of the construction and acceptance of any project covered by this 6 agreement. However, the Consultant may purchase Specific Project 7 Professional Liability Insurance which is also acceptable. 8 B. Comprehensive general liability insurance with broad form 9 endorsement, including automobile liability, completed operations and 10 products liability, contractual liability, severability of interest with cross 11 liability provision, and personal injury and property damage liability with 12 limits of $1,000,000.00 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury 1.3 and property damage. The policy or policies shall name CRA as additional 14 insured and shall reflect the hold harmless provision contained herein. 15 C. Automobile liability insurance (personal) in the amount of 16 $500,000.00. 17 D. Workers' Compensation Insurance in compliance with Chapter 440, 18 Florida Statutes, as presently written or hereafter amended. 1.9 E. The policies shall contain waiver of subrogation against the CRA 20 where applicable and shall expressly provide that the policy or policies are 21 primary over any other insurance that the CRA may have. The CRA reserves Page 8 of 13 IPG SMCRA 1 the right to request a copy of the required policies for review. All policies 2 shall contain a "severability of interest" or "cross liability" clause without 3 obligation for premium payment of the CRA. 4 F. All of the insurance is to be placed with Best rated A -8 or better 5 insurance companies qualified to do business under the laws of the State of 6 Florida. 7 The Consultant shall furnish certificates of insurance to the CRA prior to the 8 commencement of operations and is attached as Exhibit "C." The certificates shall clearly 9 indicate that the Consultant has obtained insurance in the type, amount, and classification as 10 required for strict compliance with this paragraph and that no reduction in limits by 11 endorsement during the policy term, or cancellation of this insurance shall be effective 12 without 30 days prior written notice to the CRA. 13 Compliance with the foregoing requirements shall not relieve the Consultant of its 14 liability and obligations under this agreement. 15 15. Nondiscrimination. The Consultant pledges that he does not, and will not 16 during the term of this Agreement, . discriminate against any of his employees or 17 applicants for employment because of their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, 18 and to abide by all Federal and State laws regarding nondiscrimination. Any violation of 19 such provisions shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement. 20 1 16. Mediation. Any claim or dispute arising out of or related to this agreement 21 shall be subject to informal mediation as a condition precedent to the institution of legal Page 9 of 13 IPG SMCRA 1 or equitable proceedings by either party. Both parties waive any right to arbitration. 2 The parties shall share the mediator's fee and any filing fees equally. The 3 mediation shall be held in Miami -Dade County, Florida, unless another location is 4 mutually agreed upon. 5 Contracts reached in mediation shall be enforceable as settlement agreements in 6 the circuit court for the 11 `h judicial circuit for the State of Florida. 7 17. ' Soverei2n Immunity and Attorney's Fees. The CRA does not waive 8 sovereign immunity for any claim for breach of agreement or for an award of 9 prejudgment interest; provided, however, that in any action arising out of or to enforce 10 this agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its reasonable attorney's fees and 11 costs. 12 18. Independent Contractor. The Consultant is furnishing its services as an 13 independent contractor and nothing in this agreement shall create any association, 14 partnership or joint venture between the parties, or any employer - employee relationships. 15 19. Controlling Law. This Agreement is to be governed by the laws of the 16 State of Florida,. and venue shall rest solely in Miami -Dade County, Florida. 17 20. Notices. All notices given or required under this agreement shall be. 18 deemed sufficient if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the addresses of 19 the Consultant and to the CRA specified in this agreement, unless either party shall 20 specify to the other party a different address for the giving of the notices. Page 10 of 13 IPG SMCRA 1 21. Contracting Officer Representation. For the .purposes of this agreement, 2 the contracting officers are as follows: 3 To the CRA: City of South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency 4 6130 Sunset Drive 5 South Miami, Florida 33143 6 Attention: Executive Director 7 8 9 10 To Consultant: Iler Planning Group 11 11211 Prosperity Farm Road, Suite 205B 12 Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 1.3 Attention: Henry B. Iler, President 14 15 22. Miscellaneous. In the event a court must interpret any word or provision 16 of this agreement, the word or provision shall not be construed against either party by 17 reason of drafting or negotiating this agreement. 18 23. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall bind, and the benefits thereof shall 19 inure to, the respective parties hereto, their legal representatives, executors, 20 administrators, successors and assigns. 21 24. Amendments and Modification. No amendments and/or modifications of 22 this Agreement shall be valid unless in writing and signed by each of the parties to the 23 Agreement. 24 25. Mercer; Amendment. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement 25 between the Consultant and the CRA, and all negotiations and oral understandings 26 1 between the parties are merged herein. This Agreement may be supplemented and/or 27 amended only by a written document executed by both the Consultant and the CRA. Page 11 of 13 IPG SMCRA 1 26. Access and Audits. Consultant shall maintain adequate records to justify 2 all charges, expenses and costs incurred in performing the work outlined in this 3 Agreement for at least three years after completion of this Agreement. 4 27. Ownership of Documents. All documents, reports, plans, specifications or 5 other records, including electronic records, resulting from the professional services 6 rendered by the Consultant under this agreement shall be deemed the property of the 7 CRA and the CRA shall have all rights incident to this ownership. The Consultant 8 acknowledges that all documents prepared under this agreement shall be public records, 9 and shall be subject to public inspection and copying, as provided by Florida Statutes 10 chapter 119. Upon conclusion of this agreement and any extensions, all documents shall 11 be delivered by the Consultant to the CRA. The Consultant shall have the right to retain 12 copies of the documents at the Consultant's expense. 13 28. Nonassignability. Neither .party shall 'assign any rights or delegate any 14 duties arising under this Agreement without prior written consent of the other party. 15 29. Severability. Any provision. in this Agreement that is prohibited or 16 unenforceable ' under Florida or federal law shall be ineffective to the extent of such 17 prohibitions or unenforceability, without invalidating the remaining provisions hereof. 18 Also, the non - enforcement of any provision by either party to this Agreement shall not 19 constitute a waiver of that provision nor shall it affect the enforceability of that provision 20 or the remainder of this Agreement. 21 Page 12 of 13 IPG SMCRA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Consultant and the CRA have caused this instrument to be signed by their respective duly authorized, all on the day and year first above written. Attest: ILER PLANNING GROUP By: Henry B. Iler, President Attest: CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY By: Maria Menendez, Maria V. Davis, City Clerk, City of South Miami Executive Director Approved as to Legal Sufficiency: hve A. boutsis, General Counsel Page 13 of 13 IPG SMCRA 4 South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Phase II Redevelopment Plan Supplement Scope of Services Prepared by: Iler Planning Group (IPG) 10-8-04.,, Introduction The purpose of this project is to .provide -the South Miami CRA with a Phase II Supplement to the existing Community Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan"). The CRA has been operating under the initial South Miami CRA Plan (Phase 1) for 4 years. The Interlocal Agreement with Miami -Dade County. requires that the Plan be updated (Phase -H supplement); approved by the City Commission and submitted. to the County by.. December, 2004. In addition, the Phase.II Plan must be approved by the County no later than June 2005. This.work scope, prepared.by Her•Planning Group (Consultant), is intended'to help the City prepare the Phase II Supplement and submit to the County.1t is agreed by all. parties that. expedious review of work products by City staff, and timely consideration of the Plan and applicable resolutions /ordinances by the CRA Board and City Commission will be necessary to meet* ,the schedule. The completion timeframes in this scope assume project commencement'no later than October 15, 2004. Task 1: Project Kick -off and Background Information Consultant and CRA. staff will hold a project kick -off meeting to identify coordination procedures .and background information sources. Existing information, will be obtained from 'CRA staff on current CRA tax base, projects and revenues, prior studies, infrastructure systems, socio - economic conditions, programmed/planned.capital projects, and recent private development projects.'. A field trip will be conducted of the CRA area and its environs. Timeframe: 15 days from Notice -to- Proceed (NTP). Deliverable: Kick -off meeting and field trip. Task 2: County Coordination Consultant and CRA staff will meet with County CPA. staff to clarify the required components and key issues involved with the updated of the CRA Plan. County staff will be involved in subsequent work tasks and asked to review Plan drafts. Timeframe 20 days from ATP. Deliverable: County meeting. Task 3 Community Workshop Consultant will facilitate one (1) CRA workshop, sponsored by the CRA Executive Board, to discuss redevelopment issues and -help develop a unified vision for the area. Consultant will also attend and present project recommendations at one (1) regular CRA Board meeting. Timeframe: 30 days from NTP. Deliverable: Workshops, Board meetings, and stakeholder interviews. Task 4: Draft CRA Plan Supplement Based on the, prior CRA Board, community input and discussions with County staff, the Consultant will prepare the draft Phase II' Supplement to the Community Redevelopment Plan for the CRA, Area. The Phase H Supplement will update and revise the following sections of the existing plan as necessary: Plan will build upon the existing CRA Plan and contain the following components: 1.) General description of Redevelopment Area; 2.) Creation and powers of the South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency (SMCRA); 3.) - Authority to undertake redevelopment; 4.) Safeguards and accountability; 5.) Affordable housing statement and relocation policy; 6.) SMCRA goals;. 7.) Redevelopment programs, projects and'strategies; Redevelopment agency finances andbudget projections; 9.) 'Neighborhood impacts of redevelopment improvements and programs; 10.) .. SMCRA Plan amendment process; and, 11.) Technical information, maps, and general planning statements.. All data and information- listed above will be collected from readily - available sources in ... -...- summarized - format; -,no original -data collection- or-field/ base -data analysis is - anticipated for this project. Time frame: 60 days from NTP. Deliverable: Initial Draft of CRA Master Plan Update (5 'copies). 2 Task 5: City and CRA Review, and Transmittal to County, Consultant will submit the Phase II Supplement to the CRA (3 copies) and review. the document with CRA and County staffs (1 meeting). Once appropriate, revisions have been made, the hearing draft of the Supplement will be presented to a joint meeting of the City's CRA Board (l .meeting). Once approved by the CRA Board, the Phase H Plan hearing draft will-be presented to the.City Commission (1 meeting) for, consideration and approval to transmit the Phase H Supplement Plan . Miami -Dade County for review. CRA will be responsible for, legal drafting, Plan transmittal to County, and public notice requirements, .including to taxing authorities. Ten (10) copies of the final/approved CRA Phase H. Plan Supplement will be provided by the Consultant. Timeframe: 75 days from NTP. Total Cost (Tasks 1 -5): $48,750 Deliverables: 1 initial Supplement draft, 1 hearing draft and final Supplement; I staff meeting; 2 Board/Commission meetings. Task 6 (optional): Additional, Redevelopment Planning and Implementation Services The Consultant will be available to provide additional services related to the Redevelopment Plan and its implementation including; but not limited to, the items listed below. When any to these services are requested by the City, :the Consultant will prepare a scope of work and cost estimate, based on firm labor. rates in effect atthe time, and submit a proposed work order to CRA Executive Director for approval to proceed by the City Manager. 1.) Assistance in County, review process; 2.) Additional meetings and reproduction beyond scope; 3.) Any new data and analysis associated with Finding of Necessity; 4.) Additional data /analysis, recommendations; and/or projects required by County which were not part of Phase I Plan; 5.) Special community planning, urban design, economic and engineering studies and plans; 6.) Evaluation and Appraisal Report, and Comprehensive Plan amendments; 7.) 'Land Development 7 Zoning Code revisions; 8 '.) Development review of CRA projects; 9.) CRA plan and project implementation including, but not'limited to, preparation of RFP packages for future development sites. - :._... _ ....... . -- - - i0.) CRA boundary changes _..------ ......._. _ ........... -__.. _... - .... - Time, frame: (As requested by City) Cost (Task 6): (Time and materials work order, basis per, attached IPG Labor Rates) I 2 RESOLUTION NO. 3 4 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 6 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RELATING TO 7 ATTORNEY'S FEES; APPROVING ATTORNEY'S FEES FOR 8 NAGIN GALLOP FIGUEREDO, P.A., IN THE AMOUNT OF 9 .$7,296.52; CHARGING THE AMOUNT TO ACCOUNT NO. 610 - 10 1110- 564 -31 -20 GENERAL CORPORATE; AND $204.30; 11 CHARGING THE AMOUNT TO ACCOUNT NO.. 610- 1110 -553- 12 31 -20 LAND ACQUISITION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE 13 DATE. 14 15 WHEREAS, Nagin Gallop Eigueredo, -P.A., submitted invoices to the CRA 16 for legal services rendered, costs advanced, for 0076 -001, general corporate 17 matters for the period ending September 27, 2004 in the amount of $7,296.52; and, 18 19 WHEREAS, Nagin Gallop Figueredo, P.A.; submitted invoices to the CRA. 20 for legal services rendered, costs advanced, for 0076 -008, land acquisition matters 21 for the period ending September 27, 2004 in the amount of $204.30. 22 23 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMUNITY 24 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 25 THAT: 26 27 Section 1. The South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency 28 authorizes payment in the amount of $7,296.52 to Nagin Gallop Figueredo, 29 P.A., for its attorney's fees on 0076 -001, general corporate CRA matters. 30 31 Section 2. The South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency 32' authorizes payment in the amount of $204.30 to Nagin Gallop' Figueredo, 33 P.A., for its attorney's fees on 0076 -008, land acquisition CRA matters. 34 35 Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. 36 Additions shown by underlining and deletions shown by eilarg. 1 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of October, 2004. 3 4 ATTEST: APPROVED: 5 6 7 8 9 City of South Miami Chairperson Mary Scott Russell 10 Community Redevelopment Agency 11 Clerk Board Vote: 12 Chairperson Russell: 13 Vice Chairperson, Palmer: 14 " READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: Board Member Wiscombe: _15 Board Member Birts- Cooper: 16 Board Member Sherar: 17 Board Member Bryan: 18 Board Member Cobb: 19 Eve A. Boutsis, 20 General Counsel 21 22 23 24 NAG! IN GALLOPFIGUEREDO P. A. Attorneys & Counselors 3225 Aviation Avenue - Third Floor Telephone: (305) 854 -5353 Miami, Florida 33133 -4741 Facsimile: (305) 854 -5351 October 4, 2004 Lorraine Council City of South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, Florida 33143 Re: South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency Statements, Matter ID: 0076 -001 and 0076 -008 Dear Lorraine: I enclose our firm's invoices dated September 30, 2004, for the South Miami CRA matters referenced above. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. Very truly yours, eve A. Boutsis General Counsel for the South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency EAB /glr Enclosures CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY /CLIENT PRIVILEGE NAGIN GALLOP DGUEREDOr& Attorneys & Counselors 3225 Aviation Avenue, Suite 301 Miami, Florida-33133 Telephone: (305) 854 -5353 Facsimile: (305) 854 -5351 Lorraine Council September 30, 2004 City of South Miami Community Revelopment Agency Matter ID: 0076 -001 CRA Assistant Director CRA - General Corporate 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, Florida 33143 Statement No 16583 Hours Amount 8/27/2004. EAB Met with Comm'r Sherar and telephone conference with-Ms. Davis. 2:30 0.00 8/30/2004 EAB Telephone conference with comm'r Randy.Wiscombe regarding 0.30 40.50 CRA matters; telephone conference with Mr. Joe Gibson regarding pending matters; e-mail communication with Mr. Tony Crapp and Mr. Jurgen Teintze regarding CRA existence; and coordinated meeting. 8/31/2004 EAB Revised Iler consultant agreement; telephone conference with Mr. 3.50 472.50 Gibson, city manager, Ms. Jeanette Navarro and several board members regarding legal rfp, and discrimination claim; telephone conference with Mr. Robert Meyers regarding city code and ethics code; analyzed city's discrimination policy and provided direction to staff relating to processing of claim. 9/1/2004 EAB Attention to Bernice Ellis grant agreement and possible release of 1.00 135.00 promissory note; e-mail communications with comm'r Wiscombe regarding performance evaluation of Mr. Gibson; telephone, conference with Mr. Steve Zelkowitz; and e-mail communications with Ms. Davis on pending CRA matters. 9/1/2004 EAB Analyzed interlocal agreement and interrelationship with zoning 0.50 67.50 powers in order to respond to inquiry by comm'r Sherar and Ms. Davis. 9/7/2004 LRF Conferred with Eve Boutsis and prepared censure resolution. 1:20 210.00 9/7/2004 EAB Telephone conferences with Mr. Gibson;.email communications 2.30 310.50 with CRA board regarding Sunshine laws; Iler contract, and upcoming agenda items; telephone conference with mayor Russell and Mr. Gibson on coordinating special meeting, CRA agenda and ' budget issues; and attention to censure resolution. 9/8/2004 EAB Meeting with comm'r Sherar regarding interlocal agreement; draft 3.00 405.00 Iler consultant contract; telephone conference with comm'r Marie Birts- Cooper regarding Iler negotiations; telephone conference with Mr. Gibson regarding scheduling issues, upcoming agenda items, budget hearing dates, and other pending items; attention to grant Payment is due upon receipt. Please notify us within 10 days of any questions you have regarding this invoice. Interest at a rate of 1.5% per month will be charged if payment is not received within 30 days. C�(o -1 I l0 -50 31 =Z0 Nagin Gallop Figueredo, P.A. Matter ID: 0076 -001 Statement No. 16583 Page: 2 CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY /CLIENT PRIVILEGE items and resolutions on grants to authorize grants being recorded; and telephone conference with Mr. Crapp. 9/9/2004 EAB Telephone conference with Joyce of Mr. Tony Crapp's office, and 0.30 40.50 coordinating meeting date -to discuss CRA matters. 9/10/2004 LRF Reviewed Commission Sherar's memo and conferred with Ms. 0.40 70.00 Boutsis. 9/10/2004 EAB Telephone conference with Mr. Iler regarding coordinating 1.00 135.00 negotiations and request for additional information on scope of services; telephone conference with comm'r Birts Cooper regarding contract negotiations; provided direction to staff to post notice of 9/14 negotiations; and telephone conference with Ms. Joyce of Mr. Crapp's office regarding CRA matters. 9/13/2004 EAB Telephone conference with Mr. Gibson and Mr. McCants regarding 0.40 54.00 public records request, LeRoy Taylor property and upcoming negotiations with Mr. Iler. 9/14/2004 9/15/2004 9/16/2004 9/16/2004 EAB Met with Mr. Gibson and Mr. McCants regarding budget and public 3.00 405.00 records requests; attended negotiations of consultant contract (Iler) with Mr. Gibson, Mr. McCants, and comm'r Birts Cooper; discussion with comm'r Birts- Cooper and Mssrs. Gibson and McCants regarding CRA, CRA code enforcement measures, legal counsel, etc; and drafted e-mail to Mr. Gibson regarding allegations of harassment and coordinated meeting to investigate allegations. EAB Telephone conference with Mr. Gibson regarding coordinating 5.00 675.00 meeting re: allegations of harassment; telephone conference with Mr. McCants regarding unsafe structure and purchase of structure; prepared resolutions for CRA'meeting including consultant resolution; finalized Iler consultant contract; various e-mail and telephone conference with mayor Russell, Ms. Davis, Mr. Gibson, vm Palmer, comm'r Sherar, comm'r Wiscombe, and comm'r Birts- Cooper regarding evaluations, pending matters, resolutions, and Iler contract; attention to budget issues; telephone conferences with Pastors Gay and Harris regarding coordinating walk around the CRA; and e-mail communications with Mr. Iler regarding revisions to proposed consultant contract and scope of services. LRF Conferred with Ms. Boutsis regarding censure resolution. 0.50 87.50 EAB Telephone conference with Mr. Crapp and Mr. Teintze; telephone 2.70 364.50 conference with Mr. Gibson regarding agenda and allegations; prepared resolution relating to T. Sawyer property transfer; telephone conference with mayor Russell regarding several pending items; telephone conference with comm'r Sherar regarding pending matters including habitat homes and quiet title actions; analyzed. memorandum on use of discretionary fund; and email and telephone conference with Ms. Navarro, and Ms. Davis regarding personnel related matters. 9/16/2004 EAB Attended meeting with comm'r Wiscombe to prepare evaluation of 2.00 270.00 Mr. Gibson; and made edits to proposed evaluation. 9/17/2004 EAB Finalized resolutions for CRA agenda including: Iler resolution, T. 2.00 270.00 Payment is due upon receipt. Please notify us within 10 days of any questions you have regarding this invoice. Interest at a rate of 1.5% per month will be charged if payment is not received within 30 days. Nagin Gallop Figueredo, P.A. Matter ID: 0076 -001 Statement No. 16583 Page: 3 CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY /CLIENT PRIVILEGE' Sawyer resolution, finalized Iler contract, and evaluation form; telephone conference with Mr. Gibson regarding pending matters. 9/19/2004 EAB Attention to CRA matters; forwarded emails to CRA board 1.00 135.00 regarding upcoming agenda items; telephone conference with ch. Russell regarding budget agenda items and regular meeting agenda items. 9/20/2004 LRF Conferred with Ms. Boutsis regarding pending matters. 1.10 192.50 9/20/2004 EAB Prepared declarations for discretionary funds; analyzed agenda and 6.00 810.00 budget; revised resolutions; analyzed bylaws, interlocal agreement and ch. 163, Fla. Stat; telephone conference with comm'r Birts- Cooper, Wiscombe and Sherar, e-mail communications with all CRA board, Mr. McCants and Mr. Gibson regarding pending matters; and telephone conference with Mr. Lott re: T. Sawyer matter. 9/20/2004 EAB Attended pre- budget conference with mayor and city manager; and 5.00 675.00 attended-budget hearing and partial regular agenda hearing. 9/21/2004 EAB Telephone conference with Reverend Gay; e-mail communications 1.80 243.00 with Mr. Gibson, Mr. McCants, Ms. Davis, Mr. Oshikoya, Mr. Balogun, mayor Russell, Reverend Gay regarding after action reports and necessary work prior to second budget hearing; �. attention to Ms. Valerie Newman's public record request; provided response to Ms. Newman and staff regarding public records; telephone conference with Reverend Gay regarding Wounded Healers and internship positions. 9/22/2004 EAB E -mail communications with Mr. Gibson regarding Newman public . 1.00 135.00 record request; and telephone conference with comm'r Sherar on quiet title actions; attention to unsafe structure and request to purchase the land; attention to Personal Paradise matter; and e -mail and telephone conference with Mr. McCants, Ms. Davis, and . staff regarding pending items. 9/23/2004 EAB Attended staff meeting to prepare for upcoming budget agenda; 4.50 607.50 attention to Brookes litigation; attention to quiet title actions and title search on unsafe structure; attention to code enforcement liens within CRA; and analyzed Shops of Sunset files regarding community promises, if any; and email communications with CRA board members regarding use of discretionary funds; telephone conference with mayor Russell regarding pending matters; and telephone conference with comm'r .Wiscombe regarding public records laws. 9/24/2004 EAB Telephone conference with comm'r Wiscombe and Mr. Gibson on 2.00 270.00. pending items; provided closing instructions to staff regarding . Brookes foreclosure; analyzed further resolutions regarding Shops at Sunset regarding job creation, day care, and other possible services to the community. Total Professional Services 7,080.50 Payment is due upon receipt. Please notify us within 10 days of any questions you have regarding this invoice. Interest at a rate of 1.5% per month will be charged if payment is not received within 30 days. Nagin Gallop Figueredo, P.A. Matter ID: 0076 -001 Statement No. 16583 Page: 4 CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY /CLIENT PRIVILEGE Rate Summary Luis R. Figueredo 3.20 hours at $175.00 1hr 560.00 Eve A. Boutsis 2.30 hours at $ 0.00 /hr 0.00 Eve A. Boutsis 48.30 hours at $135.00 /hr 6,520.50 Total hours: 53.80 Disbursements 9/1/2004 Mileage 9/27/2004 Disbursements incurred - 3.0% Payments 9/24/2004 9/24/2004 9/24/2004 9/24/2004 9/24/2004 9/24/2004 and Credits Check No. 46385 Check No. 46385 Check No. 46385 Check No. 46385 Check No. 46385 Check No. 46385 For Professional Services For Disbursements Incurred Current Balance: Previous Balance: Payments - Thank you 7,080.50 3.60 212.42 1,974.51 2,391.66 1,775.94 2,808.81 2,141.37 2,946.45 I ' -. I T 7,080.50 216.02 7,296.52 14,038.74 14,038.74 Total Due 7,296.52 To be properly credited, please indicate Statement Number on your remittance check. Payment is due upon receipt. Please notify us within 10 days of any questions you have regarding this invoice. Interest at a rate of 1.5% per month will be charged if payment is not received within 30 days. . CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY /CLIENT PRIVILEGE NAGIN GALLOP FIGUEREDOPA. Attorneys & Counselors 3225 Aviation Avenue, Suite 301 Miami, Florida 33133 Telephone: (305) 854 -5353 Facsimile: (305) 854 -5351 Lorraine Council September 30, 2004 City of South Miami Community Revelopment Agency Matter ID: 0076 -008 CRA Assistant Director CRA - Land Acquisition 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, Florida 33143 Statement No. 16584 Disbursements 9/9/2004 Recording Fee. 72.50 9/9/2004 Recording Fee 131.80 Payments and Credits 9/24/2004 Check No. 46385 9/24/2004 Check No. 46385 9/24/2004 Check No. 46385 9/24/2004 Check No. 46385 9/24/2004 Check No. 46385 36.05 675.42 16.00 361.53 7.20 1,096.20 Payment is due upon receipt. Please notify us within 10 days of any questions you have regarding this Invoice.' Interest at a rate of 1.5 % per month will be charged if payment is not received within 30 days. Nagin Gallop Fig ueredo, P.A. Matter ID:, 0076 -008 Statement No. 16584 Page: 2 CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY /CLIENT PRIVILEGE For Professional Services 0.00 For Disbursements Incurred 204.30 Current Balance: 2047 Previous Balance: 1,096.20 Payments -Thank you 1,096.20 Total Due 204.30 To be properly credited, please indicate Statement Number on your-remittance check. i i 1. Payment is due upon receipt. Please notify us within 10 days of any questions you have regarding this invoice. Interest at a rate of 1.5% per month will be charged if payment is not received within 30 days.