The URL can be used to link to this page

SW 40 ST_PB-YEAR-1952 BIRD ROAD S.W. 40 ST. b ♦ o ♦ ♦ • • ♦ • Y • > ♦ • • ♦ • ♦ b b V 01 33 ♦ 30 30 ° e G m+0 30 25 " � 70 04 0 01 23 2 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14!3 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Q 11 !0 9 8 097 6 5 4 3 2 Is o >Li S 630 747 6 -6 - 4- 040 y I 2 3 4 5 - O O O O O 6250 Q 16 17 l8 19 20 21 09 10 11 11.1 12 ,,,, 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 §1P 13 14 15 16 S ° N R 24 z4 U6 6 R CO 6291 6281 6271 6261 6251 4025 4030 6395 6387 6375 6367 6363 6347 Li N 31 23 23403 07 7 4032 LISTOF ADDRESS&DESCRIPTION S.W. 41 ST. 1 w N 22 .1 p8 30O O W637366 O O O I O ® O O O 22x101 8 4100 2I 20 16 15 14 3.1 13 36 5. 35 34 33 6250 SW 40 ST F#09-4024-035-001 12 11 s a 3 2 1 z1 y 6 1 1! 5 4 3 2 1 4108 LOT VBLOCK 1/MC KEEVER TERR 6394 6386 8 6 46 6338 6330 6302 6300 1 6294 6282 6270 6262 6250 10 35 35 22 23 24 25 26 27 B 29 30 3l 32 I 37 36 39 40 4125 10 4116 4025 SW 62 CT F#094024-035-024 13 14 IS 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 g 6 7 8 9 10 a 19 11 Il 6395 6387 637 36 63 9 34 6339 6331 6321 6315 6303 6291 6279 6263 6251 4124 LOT 24BLCOK 1/MC KEEVER TERR n b ° a m le 135►� 1z 12 4132 . S.W. n42 ST. • I N 4033 SW 62 CT F#09-4024-035-023 42 14 t3 LOT 23/BLOCK 1/MC KEENER TERR ff9461386' a s3 2 sl so a9 ae a7 1 as a3 a2 1 e 10 e ,8� 6 5 50 4 3 2 1 E 5 4 3 2 1 17 16 I5 14 13 - bA 6330 6322 6302 6294 628 62 6250 637 U 6235 6227 6219 6211 6203 6262 SW 40 ST F#09-4024-030-001 Q" 57 8 59 60 61 2 3 6a qg 46 LOTS 1-IVBLOCK 1/BIRDS ROAD ESTATES __ 13 14 Is _16 17 Le! 19 zo z1 P2 23 6_ 7 e 9 3s o _ e� n-------+n F y b�� 6375 6x63 6351 b� 6 31 6323 m mn07 691 62151 30 z� 50 • m " 48 49 51 52 6291 SW 63 AVE F#09-4024-030-009 (n y ° 9 S.W. 42 TERR.e N , 1 2 3 .4 5 =_ LOT 12/BLOCK 1BIRDS ROAD ESTATES To o.. 70. 69 68 67 6. 6. 66 65 79 78 77 76 6234 6228 2Q/ 6210 6202 6330 SW 40 ST F#09�024-031-001 1z 11 l0 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 a 5 4 3 2 1 '-LOT 1-12BLOCK 2BIRDS ROAD ESTATES J 6390 6374 54 6346 6338 6330 6320 6310 6302 1 6290 6282 6270 6250 68 225 53 64226 1` 0 0. 71 72 73 74 75 I 80 81 83 67 3 54 7 3 1 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 6 7 8 JO 4233 4232 I 6340 SW 40 ST F#09-4024-031-004 63 61871 63 5 6367 6351 6347 6339 6331 6321 6311 6303 1 6295 6271 6251 66 22 • 55 8 x 35 35 LOTS 13-24/BLOCK 2/BIRDS ROAD ESTATES 4241 4240 S.W. 43 ST. I u N n 65 21 Q� 56 9 e 4248 100 rOT6 8 9 67 66 85 84 20 57 104300 a Lj Lj 5 3 2 1 4249 12 !0 9 8 .•7 6 5 4 3 2 1 6290 6282 6272 6260 6250 Q 6394 6 74 366 6356 6332 6318 6302 ' 46x9 !9(y� 56 114308 N 101 102 03 1 4 105 10 09 110 1 88 69 90 91 92 (D 06 07 1 _ g 63 18 V _ 59 124316 e 6 7 8 9 10 4 7 33 14 15 16 17 18 19 0 21 2 23 24 30 25 5 25 63 63 3 6 5 6 67 6359 63-47 633 6 27 15 6303 6291 6283 6271 6263 6251 X61 p, 60 x s u n n u u 62 n w o N in S.W. 44 ST. t th 17 16 15 14 13 w n x + 70 116 115 114 113 112 111 I 22 ]21 120 119 6235 6219 4318 11. 10 9 8 7 6 4 2 4 3 2° 30 117 6380 su 6360 6350 6340, 6X30 6302 u 1 6290 2870 6250 35 r i .m v •. _ _ 30,30 _ _ _.. SW 64 AVE _ y. N ° N O N 0• + O m o® o® 1 � N •WD W N 10 NO N w a ` Q w W O A N O SO D W N I A SO N 50 N o W• Q + �� \ N W N W N V J _D+y O .^.. •D � ^+ D W v m ` m P O P m ° J J ♦ • 1 v .yam SO ywN ° m ° g6s'SS,Ia J c a xw N a v OO N SO _ m. W N xN_ J •� Dw N W m w .�_� •D SDI D' a •D .N W .D J G N X65 W SD, P N 9 O J m J O y J J P m m N m Q N m°+ I .NO U) Q ry 0+ v U) m '° ° A°+• ` ' W J m E. m O• U) O+ C J J®D+ � W I P •�S.m N � Q W U+ � W O N• ;LU. , �. O m_ m G D _ N O 3T xN m J A. o a, O f' C) J N Y N m N N J 0• WN.. m O a J .O 8N J O P m J D\ J W• I G Z D ITl O N m t N A P N S •F� a D ° > ° m N 6J3Im ° 3ym o � J 9 C D, Z ♦W o , m zo lii 6.��N o c m w o ry m ym w) 1 N O N w N °•0 1• 1 I ';� . CD w P O P O• W ' IPJ N W a - I O W a •y N •ND P W J A Q • 0 M ° P i 0, w•� Qry ry ° W W O O+ J D• ® W ry w W W m w ry O W W P P • 1 •o N Q J W A a N w C W T W N •N O N ^ ` P W ol N •°D Q• V D` a IN ry N WON NQC N w W N _N w ry g.W.. W A W N ry o y 8 P +QD 50 �O A ° N ` w SO 0 W A N N SO S J A N r J SO twpJ nwi C �"' W SO P N w w O O AVE----------------�� w r� O J N P •D N V N D• N O ... S ru�AO YO+ m �Nm yN D+ O � NO �� I N a a �• •O O+Oa OC •p � � pH•IQ r. PJ v ^ 00 +D . m JO O m P Q J ma W 4 �' J m m W r Q ry •D N a R' 0 J N n+• Q w N N J Q' m A D J oy k' v m ° Vw N QJ w ID 4= J W J S0 QY Imp Nw N G q m o' (wll b P1^ N� N o N N P N •D N a R ry 'D N q� •D N Try A Q ro N A�v K SO W O• W O P O 0 T O i N _N O N uPNi N C W r,3 c._ ^ = SO e� c O LA SO W = SO S.W 6 CT. N o ry D W N u Ln y N a P P a N a P T b W , m y S :N �' J O JO.D a •D O r {N{,,��J� N m a y I N e p� A •� w N Y N W� Na D• +U No • ry N W p W P m •D O N W N N Q I Q N a G C ry O N �cE VR m N N O J N OND J N a W w W ru ° i 0 W N O ry O o •°O N V P N gOQ xO a ° aN a•.. � A Am P J a0• � O I .. a �N ... •D m J 0. ry ry r P y° y A A A w w m m °o m ao nwi m c N N Q SO Q o u O N > a, °m °p N c L" i x SO m m ry I W a b O f' IY > W N x" S.W. 62 AVE. N N W S.W. 62 AVE. W W N N _ * * * * * PUBLIC MENU * * * * * PTXM0185 -� REAL ESTATE / PERSONAL PROPERTY INQUIRY REAL ESTATE FOLIO: 00 0000 000 0000 REAL ESTATE PROPERTY ADDRESS: 6290 SW 40 ST SUITE REAL ESTATE NAME: REAL ESTATE SUBDIVISION NO: 00 0000 000 REAL ESTATE SUBDIVISION NAME: PERSONAL PROPERTY FOLIO: PERSONAL PROPERTY ADDRESS: 00000 SUITE PERSONAL PROPERTY NAME: ENTER REAL ESTATE FOLIO, ADDRESS, NAME (LAST NAME, FIRST INITIAL) OR SUBDIVISION NUMBER OR SUBDIVISION NAME FOR REAL ESTATE INQUIRY ENTER PERSONAL PROPERTY FOLIO OR ADDRESS OR NAME FOR PERSONAL PROPERTY INQUIRY AND PRESS ENTER PRESS PF5 FOR TAX COLLECTION MENU PF10-FINISH ADDRESS NOT ON DATA BASE * * * * * PUBLIC MENU * * * * * PTXM0185 REAL ESTATE / PERSONAL PROPERTY INQUIRY REAL ESTATE FOLIO: 00 0000 000 0000 REAL ESTATE PROPERTY ADDRESS: 6290 BIRD ROAD SUITE REAL ESTATE NAME: REAL ESTATE SUBDIVISION NO: 00 0000 000 REAL ESTATE SUBDIVISION NAME: PERSONAL PROPERTY FOLIO: PERSONAL PROPERTY ADDRESS: 00000 SUITE PERSONAL PROPERTY NAME: ENTER REAL ESTATE FOLIO, ADDRESS, NAME (LAST NAME, FIRST INITIAL) OR SUBDIVISION NUMBER OR SUBDIVISION NAME FOR REAL ESTATE INQUIRY ENTER PERSONAL PROPERTY FOLIO OR ADDRESS OR NAME FOR PERSONAL PROPERTY INQUIRY AND PRESS ENTER PRESS PF5 FOR TAX COLLECTION MENU' PF10-FINISH ADDRESS NOT ON DATA BASE LISTOF ADDRESS&DESCRIPTION 6250 SW 40 ST F#09-4024-035-001 LOT IBLOCK 1/MC KEEVER TERR 4025 SW 62 CT F#094024.035.024 LOT 24BLCOK 1/MC KEEVER TERR 4033 SW 62 CT F#09-4024-035-023 LOT 23/BLOCK 1/MC KEEVER TERR 6262 SW 40 ST F#09-4024-030-001 LOTS 1-II/BLOCK I/BIRDS ROAD ESTATES 6291 SW 63 AVE F#094024-030-009 LOT 12/BLOCK 1/BIRDS ROAD ESTATES 6330 SW 40 ST F#094024-031-001 LOT 1-12/BLOCK 2/BIRDS ROAD ESTATES 6340 SW 40 ST F#09-4024-031-004 LOTS 13-24/BLOCK 2/BIRDS ROAD ESTATES If ZONING BARD MATERIAL for ME 20t 1952, ` 1 e Ili rg inla Da&.Le is lot al hearing on request to rel-zoAa so nth -- e� f � tQatv�t .a ± . lover ? ?lottc 2, copy of natiaoa dent out --- - -- etter 09--P rote6t endorsement retie .red thru Jute 18. gave tpt_tke ez�v POs ,to ah .� tti o rsP . 2$ Lnutea of last zoning Beard meetirg , ' A plioation of Florida Power t Coo for hearing for tranaformer 'V-1SED: -- Also letter r8 Sate to A#J RlOdr e t and material,re e R R eie - a ^aaa . ► tlt o zoning at Sunset west of Ludlum � �� tog-other �o� a . 5 4AR HEIGHTS material held' iffier from lash ��e� t e�na t rought e Cotten qr, b. atbr$al on Lot a 38 39 W. A. LARKM 1 , -ether than a*- 3 e ae -2 - -- SGM Mildred Sn3th, 6234 SVT 42nd St — -- - - - 0 ?00 =ird Road Fla.�t April 10, 1352 Mayor and City Council 251 Sunset Drive South Miami, Fla. Gentlemen; , m I am representing a group of property owners who own property . fronting on the South Side of Bird Road between Red Road and Ludlum Road, We desire a change of classification to High Class Business, for all of the residential property fronting on the South Side of Bird Road and lying between Red Road and Ludlum Road, because we think it desirable to have the improvements on the street as uniform in nature as possible. Submitted herewith is a copy of the petition which we have signed to this effect, and a list of the owners of the property in question, whose property is in South Miami, together with the legal description of the property they own. Only those who have signed the petition are included in this list. The original petitions will be submitted when requested. Enclosed is my check for `"10.00 which I understand is the required fee for a hearing on this matter. There are undoubtedly some who will object to the change. in zoning. However, they will benefit by the improvements which will come about as a result. Our request is based upon sound arguments and we ask that you bear these in rind while considering this matter. 1. The precedent for a business street has already been established on Bird Road at Red Road and at Ludlum Road. " I 2. Mortgage companies consider the property undesirable for residences because of the established precedent to business and because of the heavy traffic on Bird Road. 3. If you consult the evaluation department at F.H.A. Head- quarters I believe they -�rill .tell you that no applications for committments to insure loans on this property, for residences, will be accepted. 4. These factors are holding back the development of the Street. only one new house has been built in this section of Bird Road in the past two years. 5. The neighborhood is ready for a numbgr of commercial enter- prises, such as a. moving picture theatre, bakery shop, bicycle shop, furniture store, music store, doctor dentist and other professional offices. We also need a good tea-room or restaurant If South Miami does not make room for these enterprises here, other sections will continue to get improvements and business which should rightfully belong to South Miami. Respectfully submitted. .:3 Mayor and City Council 251 Sunset Drive South Idiami, Fla. Gentlemen The following signature has been added to the petition which I have submitted to you by let'ter Dorothy K. Schoenith Property owned; 4464 Prairie Ave. Miami Beach; Fla. Lots 13,14,15,16,17,18 vacant Block 2 Bird Road Estates and j Lots 20,21,22,23,24 vacant Block 2 Bird Road Estates Will you 4 ndly add this to the list of names and property already submitted in regard to our petition relative to the rezoning of the residential property on Bird Road. Sincerely yours, 1124 S. Wi First Street Miami 36, Florida June 13, 1952 South Idiami Advisory Zoning and Planning Board, South Miami,- Florida. Gentlemen: gee own Lots it and 12, Blook 2, Bird Road Estates Amended, Plat Book 32, Page 18, and other lots within 1000- feet of Bird Road, between Red Road and .Ludlum Road. I would approve of your rezoning my lots to C-2, if you eannot' zone them 0=2, zone them 0-1. Very truly, MAY L. ROTOLANTE gCM:rs �C \ N° r June 17, 1952 Mr. H. Geo. Fink, Chairman South Miami Advisory Zoning & Planning Board P. 0. Box 867 South Miami 43, Florida Dear Sir: In response to your letter regarding the possible rezoning of all residentially-zoned property fronting on the south side of Bird Road between Red Road and Ludlum Road to a Business Zoning, we are in favor of an early decision on this rezoning to avoid possible confusion later. 3� We also hope that the planning board is going to speed up the water line system for the fire hydrants located on the South Side of Bird Road in order that lower insurance rates may be' effected. It is our plan to be at the meeting on Friday evening, June 20 at the Community Bldg. Very truly yours, 962nW 10i S. W Ave. South Miami, Fla. 87-1213 P. S. To clarify the above, we are in favor of rezoning to a high class business section. We the undersigned hereby petition the authorities having jurisdic- tion over the zoning restrictions on the property located on the South Side of Bird R ad and -oxtending from Red R ad to Ludlum Road. .In this petition we request that the zoning be- changed to High Class on au and all pY'Op' +tiE0 uhich ,are trot already zoned for this use, 4C Ue the undersigned are of the opinion that High Class business is the best use for, this property'in A view of ,the fact-that Bird Road is becoming -more and,more nEavily travelled making it' uridesirible for residential purposes ' This section of Bird Road already has more improvements of a business nature than of a residential nature, r 1 k r - feet of- at Bird Road frontage is now occupied by stores or other business- uses feet of Bird Road frontage are now ccupited by residences Signed: by own Legal description of vacant or ' property owned improved , l 4 -and 5 of " L ;:. Gre :pan and Jc4n K. Green°pan �;c�{eever icrruc—e yacent Address A • 420 Rive "to Islarrl, ''ian.i,Beach, F1 y L 1. 4, and 5 ,of vac4nL- N e .11.Greenepan h n3d, j can Uri ispuam ;;c_teevcr "exrace i 420 ^ivo alto Isla, ::iani Beach, Fla. Address =-- WE the undersigned hereby -petition the authorities having jurisdiction over tho zoning rpstrictionis on the property located on the South Side of Bird Road and extending from Red Road to Ludlum Road. In this petiti n we request that the zoning 'be changed to High Clas-' Business use (B 1) on any and all properties which are not already zoxied for this use C We the -undersign' ed arc of the qinion that High Class business is the best use for this property n vier of the fact that Bird Road is becoming morL and more heavily travelled making it•undssirable f OP rftiftntial PMtpot�R. This sedtion, of Dira Road already has more improve=,(:.nts of a business. nature than of a residential nature. Signed by owner LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF vacc.nt or Proper ty improved. LOTS PP 23 and 24 5LOCK 1 MCKEEVER TERRACE, VACANT Owners name 7 Owners addrcBs um,ers name Owr-,-r:� address name .�� v . � ii .i V� 1,' td�' M - - - - - � - I ,� �i WE the undersigned hereby petition the authorities having jurisdiction over the zoning restrictions on the property located on the South Side of Bird Road and extending from Red Road to Ludlum. Road. In this petiti n we request that the zoning be changed to High Class. Business use (0, 1) on any and all properties which are not already zoned for this use. We the undersigned are of .the opinion that High. Class business is the best. use for this property in view of the fact that Bird Road is becoming more and more. heavly travelled making it undesirable for residential purposes.' .This section of Bird Road already_ has more improveine:ts of a: business nature than of a residential nature. Signed by owner LEGAL DESCRIPTION CF - vacant or ,. Property improved. !20i( 11? A6 9 J_Q! -0 f-1 1povw owners. addres's Owners name Owners address Owners name owners address We the undersigned hereby petition the aut'ht�ritics hatrJTig jurladicti n over the 4jonino restrictions on the property located on the South Side of Bird Road end extending from Red lRoact to Ludlum. Road. In this peti.ti n we request that the zoning be changed to High Class Business Use on any and all properties which are not already zoned for this use. We the undersigned are of the opinion that High. Cl ass business is the best use .for this property in view of the fact that Bird Road is becoming more and more heavily travelled I riaking it undesirable for residential purposes. This zection, of :Bird Rv ad already has more improvements of, a business nature than of a residential nature. Signed by owner Legal Description of Vacant or property owed improve. ?bird Road Estates C,A�tl JkIA�� F We the undersigned .hereby petition the allthorities having turisdi,ction over the zoning restrictions on the. roperty located on the South Side of Bird Road and extend ng from Red Road to Luditm Road. In this petition we request that the zoning be changed to High Class Business use (C 1 on any and all properties which are not already zoned for this uses We the undersigned are of the opinion that High Mass business is the beat use for this property in view of the fact that Bird Road is becoming more and more heavily travelled making it undesirable for residential purposes. This section of Bird Road already has more improvements of a business nature than of a residential nature* Signed bar owner Legal Descriptiono of Vacant or , Proper ty improved. Lnts 8 s.name 8 7TH('�?71t / q iea Al.. k P Ri tr� Rnar� H,� Address dates ��'lfSi:t` .�..-• '.L.. .[�!:�/�[�f:� ..tl�+;,,il name Legal Block 2, Bird Road Address Estates: i f we the undersigned hers-by retition the uutharitit ax h&ving juriediati n over the sowing rtstrietions on the property lacy, Lid on the South uidt of Bird Iloiud and eatmding from Red RoA to Ludlim Road. 3:r this putiti n ve reque:.t that the sorting be changed to High Cla:i:� Business Use on .ny and all propertic:m w?:ich 4:re not al.rcady zoned for this use. ;o the undersigned are of the opinion that Nigh Cl:..::s bu:�incLs is thL bcst use for ti-is :�rorerty in vic 6 :4f the f act that gird Ro,-''d Is becoming mart and mom he..vil.y fr�4v(_ tl.ed: vi�iki,4, tt unat�-sirable for m idcnti l purposes. Thin r(etion of Bird R ud �vlrciaiy lW-s ,.-re im;.rovmcntr cf a business natzre than of a residenti�v�l �-LA t.Lrca. igned by c.,mor Lz; ;:.1 Der c rl �i.gin of vzx. .rsL or ` x'i)r?{;jC�.ti' ii'.:�tE'� .°�.it':�'.Tr �l�•El 1 L 1 ?iTe t1ae undersi-ned hercby retition the aut horities hcaving :jurisdiction over the zoning restrictions on the nronerty located on the South Side of 'bird Road Lnd e1 tending from Fed Road to Ludlum road. In this retition we rer-?est that the zoning be changed to ?Tialh Class Business use (C 1 0vt any and all properties which are not already zoned for t'lis use. Vle the undersigned are of the opinion that 7igh Class b,1.siness is t"e best use for t?.Zis rro7.ert-,T in view of the fact th�.t Bird Foad is becoriing more and -ore heavily travelled ma hing it undesirable for residential purposes. This section of Bird Road already has more in-rovenents of a business nat,�.re t'an of a residential nat-xe. Signed by owner ,e,gal Descrintiono of Vacant or Proper, is proved Os.,`hers nav e 1ega? 0imers name �egai A, r e S s IC7�' I� r -WB the undersigned hereby petition the authorities having jurisdiction over the zoning restrictions on the property located on the South Side of Bird Road and extending from Red Road to Ludlum Road. In tUs petiti n we request that the zoning be changed to Mgh Class Business use (B 1) on any and all properties which are not already zoned for this :use. wwp !.' the undersigned are of the opinion, that High Class business is the e best use for this property it view of the fact that Bird Road is becoming more and more -heavily trav;_;l.led making At undesirable for residential. .pu.rposea. This section of Bird. Road already has more improY E.I'M ones of a. b siness nature than of a residential nature. Signed by ovm.er LEGAL' MECCLIPTICN OF vacant or Property improved. M171 e 0imer s address r� x's n.<me Own address fll/-wn.ers name owners .dress :;. �c:�`.r,s:� is :32"t vL.r : f�t�n—l-il,,; rt:,O L-vic�.�.�im- ��xl i,�14 �'1"( °�'1 : ` J..0c t tl uu L'i't. t,ril4th 1',i Q cat 11.tvU It • .z ;�; :�, ,:.. � °:r. : ; ,¢, A a Xa'1l �i�I1 .; > 7t .t �yny are .�{:�y�J. .. . .t; -uuiaW, �bL cli �a;rc.c to ITJ,, � ` :s,,�:k. ; , a !` r zuni-d or ;_ZZ. :tot) j�ay'.¢g u��t (.+t# E,c x oef! �0,-V, e�•yoilli rnt,tu I �&' H, t� ]. a }y:{; �)A �y thV b+.wit Li•ijv for t7:.LN �)vu Al Lrt)r -•n th vl E:,i. udry kr�.�,•i� Xll-.ct C , i•eu, lia-Ai AG _Zv r1111 is Niiy � :�� r , �-��;,, :i.� atx��c�,,}i�.��.�Z�� •�'�.ai T,In „A:utivn ur 1'Awl 90�"� � e.; l, ,',v.. z V.i: n o .:�11,�.=$' . .: �� • e��C-P��r�� r �... H #.�.. �/ ..�+n,t ' bird 1 SwkIut,:L ♦?:ate !�M�i`� �t F}hi13r•��Z .. ./ �I.��.i.! �• i. ..,Y..�...wawar..wa.w�!cr..........•-�n...wy.-,..i. .�..ir. !• t...i! �.�� 1).�:..h"�i •t.; �' 4�_'r-CY�.F:..4��.. 1 Oz 0-)V..C: rte,.• q. " :i,cnt -dAe` by aim,-r 'Lfug-I dc�Cri~atic of "r•tic P-t or ty Y f r • '-.'-" •+rwww.+.w---•-'.r-.. •.+.w....ye+wi.•�.w«rw.+...•w.a+•r.s..r:�.�,:.+� ..�.-r..+.. e.:- - �p� P M;IC R MUG BX TIM XAMx WARDS, 'Friday Qe�Ani�► SDPI90RY ZOIdIN(3 the Coma. 81dgo on aVuastift p Vine �, at 8:00 Nut at to rezone all residentialiq»La� IAU Daniels and others south aide of Bird Road b d� fronting on the a Business tongs fax and/or C.,� Road and Ludlum Road to similar to that already est blIdI d at Permit develop to yam. grope Bird da Rag, terested ' lieein 1000 feet of this persons are urged to attend the hearing. All in' to the hearing;action should be !'sled with the Prior The Board reserves the right to re ad f aoent areas, to change minimos Oend arestri to include eta., for the best interests of an restriotian'as Coning plane overall Oavrahensive SOVIR MUM AVIISORY Zo wy cap NI2� � p,� ;BOARD Q -.. N b OF PUBLIC REARM BY THE SoVm MIAMI ADVISORY ZONING & PLANNIM BOARD& I'ri y eveting,§ June 20, at 8,00 P.M. at the COMM- Bldg. on applio4tivn of Virginia Daniels end others to rezone all residentially zoned property fronting on the south side of Bird Road between Red Road and Ludlum Road to a Business Zoning+ (0-1 and/or Cwt) to permit developVwts similar to that already established at Bird & Red. Your property lies wiUdn lOOO feet of this areas All in• terested persons are urged to attend the hearing. written approval or objection should be filed with the Board prior to the hearings The Board reserves the right to recommend changes to include i adjacent eireass to change minimum or other restrictions, etc+, for the best -interests of an overall comprehensive Zoning plane S4OTJTH MIAMI AINISORY ZONING & PLANNING BOARD • 90e Nnnko Cha rman �� ys AP o � jj� o2 2,,,& 0 0 3 (J d i9 , srz 3 �� R�� . Via, ens WE e c c ape HUGH PETERS,CHAIRMAN eee e c a DISTRICT N0.2 € ��qA uS�s, CVICAR,VICE CHAIRMAN t MONO - DISTRICT No.3 JESSE H.YARBOROUGH n _ _ n! D C �O I„'�'I�'I�,.�,�,,� M. �Ic,, CORM DA DISTRICT No.I r .. C U NN III� Lrf' L L1•(1 r 1 - PRESTON B.BIRD _ r r rr ill r DISTRICT No.4 R O.BOX 3289 LOUIS F.SNEDIGAR DISTRICT NO.5 4W e MIAMI 21,FLORIDA E.B.LEATH ER MAN,CLERK 'ate H.S.SWEETING,DEPUTY CLERK W.M.MONROE,DEPUTY CLERK HUDSON B.CASON,ATTORNEYS DADE COUNTY COURT HOUSE June 17, 1952 South Miami Advisory Zoning and Planning Board South Miami. City Hall South Miami, Florida Attention: Yx. H. George Fink, Chairman. Dear W. Fink: We have requested Mr. R. F. Cook, Director of the Dade County Planning, Zoning and Building Department, to write you and your Board a detailed objection to the rezoning of the southside of Bird Road from Red to Ludlum, from its present zoning to business zoning. Our Board has repeatedly turned down requests to change zoning on the northside and other parts of Bird Road. This is a main arterial highway -- business strangles traffic. We feel that sufficient business zoning is already there and that additional business zoning would deteriorate adjoining residential property as well as present business property. We earnestly solicit your Board's cooperation in maintaining the present zoning. As County Commissioner of that district I assure you that the surrounding property owners agree with our Board. Thanking you for your kindness and consideration, I am Sincerely, ESS OROUGH, /ha:3.rman Pl ing, Zoning et Building Committee CC: Mayor, South Miami_ Phr. R. F. Cook OFFICE OF PLANNING,ZONING & BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1 4 0 9 COURT H O U S E PHONE 9-7591 MIAMI 32. FLORIDA June 17, 1952 South Miami Advisory Zoning & Planning Board South Miami City Hall South Miami, Florida Attention - Mr. H. George Fink, Chairman Dear Mr. Finks. Relative to the hearing to be held on Friday, June 20, 1952, by your Board pursuant to an application by Virginia Daniels and others to rezone all residentially-zoned pro- perty between Red Road and Ludlum Road (South side) to C-1 or C-2, this Department de- sires to submit this unqualified objection thereto, based on the following reasons. First, the two business centers established at Bird Road and Red Road one located in South Miami (Segal) and one located in the unincorporated area (Crandon] offers suf- ficient good, developed business facilities to serve the area concerned. any additional business zoning and resultant development would only serve to detract from these fine business developments which were erected at great expense,and which warrant protection because they do provide all required types of business and the facilities to serve the public. Second, it was the understanding of this Department, at the time the aforementioned business centers were established, that one of the purposes of these well-planned centers was to eliminate any necessity or need for stripping Bird Road, or Red Road with commer- cial zoning and development. Certainly such practice of strip zoning, while admittedly done by many jurisdictions in the past, is definitely contrary to all good planning practice. Third, the practice of strip commercial zoning not only leads to the establishment Of marginal businesses which struggle for survival and eventually require liberal business zoning in order to maintain themselves with any semblance of financial success, but such practice also cuts down the traffic carrying ability of the major and arterial streets along which the commercial zoning is established. Further, such extensive business zoning inevitably detracts from and devalues the residential property which abutts the commercial area. It might also be pointed out that because a particular street is a major or arterial thoroughfare does not mean that it cannot be developed residentially (i.e. Red Road, Coral Way, Gratigny Road, parts of Bird Road, including certain portions of the area in question, etc.). Some of the finest residential development in Dade County and in other parts of the country has developed along major streets and highways. The Dade County Planning Board and the Board of County Commissioners have, in recent years, established and practiced the policy of refusing to approve the stripping of any streets with commercial zoning. Instead, where business is warranted, it has been confin- ed to an area of sufficient width and depth to provide for proper,adeauate and well-spaced. business centers, such as exist at Bird and Red Roads. Page #2 - S. Miami Advisory Zon. & Plan. Bd. - 6/17/52 It is sincerely hoped that your Board will refuse the requested re-zoning. Please excuse the somewhat lengthy objection, but it is brought on by the strong feeling that such zoning as proposed can be nothing but detrimental to the residential and business development already existing, to the street on which it would front, and to the individ- uals who would attempt to maintain businesses on the property which the application covers. Very truly yours, R. F. Cook, Director Dade Co. Planning, Zoning & B1dg. .Dept. RFC/gh sass �e��o D 6234 S.jfi. 42 St. ' M&ami,Florida June 17,1952 Advisory Zoning & Planning Board .South Miami Dear Sirs: I wish to register my objection to the south side of Bird Road between Red Road & Ludnum being changed to a business zoning. I have three boys, and feel it would be d6trimental to their best development to live so close to liquor stores such as those already established at Bird & Red. I bought the property feeling it was a good residential neighborhood in which to bring up boys, and would feel that my property had lost its major value for me if a business section were allowed so close. People ought to have a sense of security about their neighbor- hood. That should not be sacrificed by rezoning. If there were a need-a serious need- for more stores so close, it would be a different matter. But the present stores meet all reasonable need. So why ruin a neighborhood for children? Sincerely t!t 4108 S. W. 62 avenue Miami, Florida South Miami Zoning Board George Fink, Chairman South Miami, Florida Gentlemen: We wish to protest- the rezoning all .residentially- zoned property fronting on the south side of Bird Road between -Red Road and Ludlum Road to a Business Zoning, (C-1 and/or C-2) to permit developments similar to that already established at Bird and Red Roads. We fell that this is not necessary inasmuch as a business district is within such short distance of us. We are sure this would not increase the value of our property but lower it. As a family interested in the welfare of our children and those of our neighbors we find nothing in a business zc)ning that would aid in their welfare and safety. Hoping that you will take thse thin--s greatly into consideration, we are Yours respectfully, George and Mildred Ferguson. MRS. HENRY STEVENS MASON 4133 SOUTH WEST 62ND AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA June 20, 1952 South Mian-Li (advisory Zoning & Planning Board South Miami., Florida Gentlemen; We herewith file our objection to the rezoning of all residentially-zoned property fronting on the south side of Bird Road between Red Road and Ludlum Road to a Business Zoning. We the undersigned are property owners within one thousand feet of the property under consideration.. We most emphatically do not believe there is the slightest necessity for any further business zoning in this area, and wish to place on record our complete objection. Very truly yours, 6315 SW 42nd St. , South Miami, Fla. June 17th 1952 South Miami Zoning and Planning. Board Gity Mall f South Miami, Florida Dear Sirs: As a resident and property owner in the Bird Boad Estates section of South Miami I am strongly opposed to the changg in zoning of property on Bird Road as proposed by Virginia Daniels and others for the following. reasons: 1. When I purchased my home in this area one and one half years ago I was informed that the area was zoned for residential use only and I purchhased with this fact in mind. Had there have been business property in such close proximity I would not have invested my savings in a home in this area. 2. There is no need for the stores etc. named in the Daniels proposal. Adequate facilities for shopping of the residents of this area are provided at Red and Bird roads for ordinary purchasing while other consumer goods and services are available in' the downtown section of South Miami and Coral Gables. We are doAng fine without these added stores and any business they would draw would only be at the expense of other established South Miami merchants. 3. only five of the fourteen petitioners are residents of South Miami and it is only natural that the remaining nine have no civic interest other than personal profit. 4. It is an established fact of city growth that the introduction of business enterprises to residential areas lowers the resale value of the homes in the area. The proposed change would benefit the few at the expense of many. The citizens of Bird Road Estates have a right to expect their city officials to safeguard their property rights. 5. The property in question already has homes scattered along its l6ngth. The interspercement of business houses would result in an unatractive hodge-podge such as Miami has along NE 2nd Ave. and along SIW Stn St. , r Page 2 H. W. Stdele 6. Flashing ..on sign's, gaudy bilboards,vverflowing garbage cans and ugly back entrances with roaring delivery trucks will be the senic prospect for us who live here. Since there are no alleyways in this area and lot depths do not permit them, it is obvioua- that all deliveries wall have to be made from Bird Road or from SW 41st St, This will add to the noise and traffic problem considerably. While super market�s and theaters provide some 'off-the-street parking, small business never do provide adequate parking facilities for their clients. This increased traffic will be parking in front of drivewagy and blocking residents from acces to their homes. This is a common problem in bbher parts of the Greater Miami section--we dontt want it here. 9. Traffic on Bird Road is increasing and will increase more when the enormous Makle project out west on Bird is completed. Business houses on Bird would only add to this traffic burden and constitute a menace to the children of our neighborhood. S. . Petitioners state that lots on Bird Boad are not accepted by mortgage houses for loans. I submit that petitioners were well aware of this fact when they purchased. Anyone of the business acumen which is displayed by their present proceedure is attempting this change would not be naive enough to purchase property wouthout investigating the loan posibilities. 9. Petitioners state that if change is not approved these business w&ll go elsewhere. This is a cheap threat to try to influence the Zoning Board to approve this change in order to secure the additional tax revenue than this petition dangles before the Board. This point of the petition is one which is not worthy of consideration by the Zoning Board. 1. It is my earnest desire that the Board consider the few advantages of this project and the many dis- advantages and render the only fair decision that can be made--DISapproval of the Daniels petition. Yours for a Bet er South Miami, t r Aa` a Steele .�.�- 04 Ao" eA ,Ooj G�� ac z• Aox ,Jd-IAMA CAL po� 06 AA 4., 6303 S. R. 42 Street South,Mismi, Florida June 17, 1952 South Miami Advisory Zoning. and Planning,Board Mouth Miami, Florida A272: Mr. H. Geo. Fink, Dhairman Dear Sir: a In reference to the re-zoning of Bird Road for business, from Red Road to Ludlum Road, I hereby inform you that ny wife and I are opposed to sai&ahange. The business establishments west of Sixty Fifth Avenue, on Bird Road and the business section at Red and Bird Roads intersection are adequate for this area. We are also opposed to this unnecessary change in zoning because it would mean increased traffic around our home. We bought our property and built our home here because it is a residential zone void of heavy and continuous traffic and a safe and healthy place to raise our children. Respectfully yours, David J Mc:bane Miami, Florida June 16, 1952 So. Miami Advisory Zoning & Planning Board South Miami, Florida Gentlemen: Z purchased my property with the knowledge that the Property- on Bird Road at 63rd Avenue_ was zoned for residential. T do not approve that the property from Red Road to Ludlam on Bird Road be zoned for business. Homes have been built on Bird Road from. 58th Ave, t6 63rd Ave, The road is narrow and the traffic, when Tropical Park is 6pbn, is very heavy. There isntt a lot deep enough to set the buildings back far enough for off the street parking, there- fore, cars would park on Bird Road causing a congestion. There isntt any need for a grocery store as we are all within walking distance of the shopping district. The people living in back of any store would have to face the rear of the buildings where all the garbage etc. would be kept, Respectfully Yours, (Miss) Ruth M, Boudreau June 17th, 1952 Mr. H. George Fink, Chairman South Miami Advisory Zoning and'Flanning Board South Miami, Florida Dear Sir: We, the undersigned, hereby object to the application of Virginia Daniels and others to rezone all residentially- zoned property fronting on the south side of Bird Road be- tween Red Road and Ludlum Road to a Business Zoning, (0-1 and/or 0-2) to permit developments similar 'to that already established at Bird and Red, for the following reasons: 1. We feel that the increase in traffic will be dangerous to our children. 2. This is a nice quiet neighborhood, and we do not care to have the noise, (hornblowing, etc.) that would result if business stores are built near us. 3. It would decrease the value of our property, and also make it harder to sell, if, for any reason, we want to do so. No one wants to buy a house right on top of super stores. Hoping you will take these things into consideration at the hearing Friday, we are, Sinc rely yours, Mr .& Mrs. W.D. Stiles,. 5815 S.W . 41st. St. , South Miami 439 Aa. , June 14, 1952. South Miami 'Advisory Zoning & Planning Board, Mr . H. Geo. Fink, Chairman. Gentlemen: ReoAived your notice of a public hearing to be held Friday dvening dune 20; at -8:00 P.M. concern- ing the proposed rezoning of all residentially-zoned property fronting ontthe south side of Bird Road be- tween led Road and Zudlum Road to a business zoning. We hereby submit our objection to the proposed rezon- ing. If the above rezoning is approved, the res- idential value of our home would immediatly drop. Our home faces 41st. Street and would soon be back to back with some store or other commercial building. The back of such buildings is generally unsightly, not to mention the traffic nuicance and noise of bik tritaks backing and unloading almost in your backyard. So I think you can readily see why we are opposed to the proposed rezoning. Sincerely yours, /Wilfred D. Stiles r dose ine Stiles ( Wife) • t �� Gem ��• 1 t • 1 99 � /J/� Wiz.✓ - � l/ e r South Miami 43, Fla. 625c; s. w. 41st St., June 17, 1952 South Miami Advisory Zoning & Planning Board P. 0. Box 8.67 South Miami 43, Fla. Gentlement We., the undersigned, hereby file objection toapplication of Virginia Daniels and others to rezone property fronting on the south side of Bird Road between Red Road and Ludlum Road to Business. Zoning._ Walter B. BracImey Chas:. B. Worthington t f C -'"� // � bi]9 .ou./ 4r pF. N,Tin '+ , � �n � - � �� Q - 6330 BIRD ROAD EVAN J. BARTELL, Pastor Miami 43, Florida PHONE 87-5151 June 15, 1952 South Miami Advisery Zoning and Planning Board South Miami, Florida Gentlemen: Having received notification of the request to re-zone all residentially-zoned property fronting on the south side of Bird Road between Red Road and Ludlum Road to a Business Zoning (C-1 and/or C-2); we would like to state our reaction to the proposal, The Church Council of Hope Church is against the proposal to re-zone these properties because: 1: The Church purchased this property when it was zoned for only residential use and it was ex- pected to continue so. 2. It would be detrimental to the area and Church if any commercial establishments are allowed near surrounding homes, particulary on the S uth side of Bird Road between 65th avenue and 5th Avenue. We respectfully request that this statement of our posi- tion be given due condideration when the above-mentioned request is considered anal acted upon by the board. The Church Council of Hope Lutheran Church by H. W. Heinemann, Sec, ♦ 4 4116 S. W 6�nd Ave. South Miami,, Fla. June 13 , 1952 South Miami advisory- Zoning & Planning Board. Box, 867 ° South, Miami. 43 , Florida Attention: Tt+Lr. H. George Fink_ Dear Sir: Sn. reply to your recent..letter concerning the re- zoning of:the pneserit, residential area between. Red. Road and Ludlurn: Road on� the south side t6 ' a business district. As owners of a residential 'property- within_ this area,_ we -hereby protest to any and 'all changes from-. a* residential district. Rezoning in this area would greatly decrease the property value of many fine homes. Opening the district -to gas stations,- repair shops;, stores,, restaurants , and taverns such. as are already established at Red Road and at Ludlum. Road would endanger the lives of our children, and harm. the welfare of the community, in general. The businesses already established near this area are more than adequate to serve this region. Rezoning would serve the best inter- ests of a few at great cost to many. We are writing this protest in anticipation of being out of town during a part of the summer. We will. advise you later our mailing address should any further, occat ion for contacting us arise, Yours truly,, 6282 S.W. 42nd Street South rRami. 439 Florida June 14, 1952 South Miami Advisory Zoning and Planning Board Attn: 114r. H. Gee,, Fink.. Chairman City of South M- ami. P94. Box 867 South Miami 439 Florida Dear Sir: In answer to your notice reebived June 12, please be advised that I am entering a protest against the application of Virginia Daniels and others to rezone all residential zoned property fronting on the south side of Bird Road,between Red Road and Ludlum Road to a business zoning (0-1 and/or 0-2). I can see no reason to build another commercial district in the aforementioned area since there is a sufficient number of such commercial districts to serve the people satisfactorily. Yours truly, Frederick A. Walker FAW/bw ' Duplicate copies 6282 S.W. 42nd Street South Pdami 43, Florida June 14, 1952 South Miami Advisory Zoning and Planning Board Attn: Mr. H. Geo. Fink, Chairman P.O. Box 867 South Miami 43, Florida Dear Sir: In answer to your notice received June 12, please be advised that I am entering a protest against application, of Virginia Daniels and others to rezone all residential zoned property fronting on the south side of Bird Road between Red Road and Ludlum Road to a business Zoning (0-1 and/or 0-2), I can see no reason to build another commercial district in the aforementioned area since there is a sufficient number of such commercial districts to serve the people satisfactorily. Yours truly, Marguerite I. GValker M/bw 4 JUNE 195E SOUTH MIAMI ZONING BOARD, SOUTH MIAMI FLA. , DEAR SIRS, I HAVE JUST BEEN INFORMED OF A MOVEMENT TO REZONE PROPERTY- ALONG BIRD ROAD IN THE VICINITY OF S.W. 42ND. AVE FROM RESIDENT- IAL TO BUSINESS . BEING A HOME OWNER AND TAXPAYER OF SOUTH MIAMI I WISH TO EN- TER A PROTEST AGAINST SUCH A MOVE. AS I AM A MEMBER OF THE U.S.NAVY AND STATIONED IN NORTHERN IRELAND I AM UNABLE TO APPEAR IN PERSON TO PRESENT A FORMAL PRO- TEST SO 1 WISH YOU WOULD USE THIS LETTER AS SUCH. ALSO I WOULD LIKE TO APPOINT MR. GEORGE FERGUSON OF 4105 S.W. 62ND. AVE .AS MY REPRESENTATIVE IN ANY MATTERS PERTAINING TO REZONING. IN THE FUTURE I WOULD APPRECIATE BEING NOTIFIED OF ANY MATT- ERS PERTAINING TO. REZONING- OF PROPERTY IN SOUTH MIAMI WHICH WOUL- LD AFFECT ME. SINCERELY, REMAIN , r,Y 30. fVJAMI ADDRESS IS- R.M.EVANS, BULC, 4100 S.W. 62ND AVE. NAVY #220, FLEET P .O. , NEW YORK iV .Y. i (1i5 I-c+fir Carne Pro" EE htho0w 1 6113 S. W. 42nd Street, Miami, Florida June 13 , 1952 South Miami Advisory Zoning & Planning Board, South Miami, Florida Gentlemen: We wish to place in writing our objection to rezoning all residentially-zoned property fronting on the south side of Bird Road between Red Road and Ludlum Road to a Business Zoning. We will be out of town on Friday evening, June 20th, when.'the public hearing will take place and take this opportunity to voice our objection. We feel' that the business section at Red and Bird Roads will adequately took care of the needs of this community for some time to come ; and there are plenty of honky-tonks west of 64th Avenue to take care of the element that desires such places. We truest you will keat the interests of the many home owners living in this area constantly before you and not the interests of a few desi3i ng to make a few dollars from such a rezoning. Yours very tr (Mr . and Mr J D. W. Pinkard) llvu,. (William Lyvu 6250 cS.CW. 42nd cSt¢sst cSoutii c�lamf, ��o¢Lc�a Jai, C� q 7 dll AJ cm 4 -- -� f C. D o cg� lab- 4,s. (William Eyva 6250 S.('W. 42nd SfzFEf IsouL9 4taml, '3Loz da MRS. CHARLES LUEHL 4224 SOUTH WEST 60TH PLACE MIAMI 48, FLORIDA A,� a A/V �` 6A Q. aa- AA,"ID tit 1:1,� ox <k- �°� ,, e. Kam. 642 1 41st Street South Miami, Florida Tune 18, 1952 South Pivmi Advisory Zoning A PlcnninS Board P ,O . Box 1867 South Miami 43, Florida Attn: H. Geo. Fink, Chairman Deer Sir: This is in answer to your notice of a rezoning hospinc of the ppoperty ,10cated olthe South Odkof Bird Road between Red 0 Tudlum. Roads to a business zoning. I cm unplterobly aSainst this rezoning. T'v -,,--iife and I purchased this property in Dece-,-aber of 1949 witA the thought in mind that this was zoned for residential us only and that business was not permitted to o7erate in this vicinity-. As a person interested in this comnunity and moviq, into P nice residential section with the thought of raising a famiI7 in P nice environment, I wri viho!17 wholly and totally against this rezoning. The applicant, Virginia Daniels, moved here some time after 'we did anti almost inmediateiy started to pass a petition around the ne!Shbobhood to rezone the property mentioned. She had no thovg _t of living in aresidential area for any length of time . She had moved her real estate office into a .residential area and hhd to hp.ve v conriaint filed against her by the families in this vrea for th o vioiatioN she had co�nitted in puttinC up unsightly signs. A fvrtAer note; tie buninesses located vt both enAs of Wrd Rend, in tils petition, are more thon sufficient for t' n nopulption in tA!s section. Cer"Pinly there gyre enough bars here ,with the Red Bird brr ond Shorty's Bar, not counting ril the r3staurants rnd Drive-in' s tint serve Wer 0 tAe touters. At this ncetlnS we would li -e the legal reCulations exqainen to us in reCry4s to ArvinS e Zuarrntee by the city that we cF be assured of v lav; 'eriod of tL_ie i-o ,-,rhich we will not be bothereJ wW cn, more ' petitions being rreconted for consideratl7n for a rezoning. Thant you, Times P . Awin 6359 south West 42nd Street South Miami Florida June 13, 1952 Mr.' H. Geo. Fink, Chairman, South Miami Advisory Zoning and Planning Board South Miami Florida Dear Mr. Fink: I hereby file notice of my objection to the approval of the application of Virginia Daniel and others to rezone all residentially-zoned property fronting on the south side of Bird Road between Red Road and Ludlum Road to busi- ness zoning. This area is one of one-family residences in which most of the owners, young veterans, have invested their savings and have settled down with the hopes of protecting their investments and of finding a measure of peace and quiet for themselves. It is a lovely neighborhood, one of the best in the City of south Miami. I feel that to .hy rezone the area would be to deprive,'the owners of a portion of their investment since depreciation of property values would inevitably result from close proximity to noisy busi- ness activity. Most of us who reside here could ill afford to have our property depreciate in value in such a manner. This is an area of young families and many small children live within 1000 feet of the area. Increased traffic on our now quiet streets would be the end result of such a change in zoning. The business area located at Red and Bird Roads and that area east of Ludlum Road and north of Bird Road adequately serve this area and it is a question in my mind that more businesses in this section are needed for one frequently sees small businesses moving away from the Red-Bird area and others taking their places for a short time until they, too, move away. A constant turn-over in the small businesses in this area is evident even to a casual .observer. I, therefore, earnestly request the board to consider all of thesd reasons why the peace and tranquillity of this r area should not be distrubed in order to provide financial gain to a few at the expense of many small home owners. V R pectfully submitted,�&� ar s Allen. 6263 S. We 42 St. Miami 43, Fla, June 17, 1952. South Miami Advisory Moning & Planning Board H. Geo. Fink, Chairman Dear sir, As owners and residents of Lot 9 Block 4 subdivision Bird Road Estates, we definitely object to rezoning south side of Bird Road from residential to business. Yours truly, + _7A . No""CB,TOF�` PUBLIC HEARING BY THE SOUTH VjA►ml ADT�I3f.RY ZONING & J�J..tKS!i�„i.itiv d7J;-P,4j F-Z idQv e � rr � � s e'9°uTI�TI�� 3rZT1c� y L p1d6o ou a:r?pli 1�o PC 20110 ,?t 3('C.es' tau”iZ£kl�jwpZe7TSl pro6,,:7'EBzt, "x-o 4:.ng- or: ha sou*)- s ode of Bird Road botvemon R(-%d :Rcr�d and L-Adlu m Zead to a Du .;.zaess Zoning, axid/o G-2) tO pemit develpp;mte w�,' to that alreactr established at Bird & Redo Your propert'l lies within 1000 feet of this area* All in• tw v at3d personas are urged to attend the hearing:, Written VProval or.objection should be filed with the Board prior to the hearings The Board reserves the right to reeomr►end changes to include adjacent areas, to change minimum or other restric}i.sns� etc., for the best interests of an overall co�reshonsiv zoning plea., SOUTH �9IAMI ADVISORY ZONING do PLANNING BOARD - He Geo—e-Wnk 1 a — Y owl A �- VV� C. D. Albury 4125 S.W. 62 avenue Miami, Florida City of South Miami South Miami Advisory Zoning and Planning Board South Miami, Florida. Dear Sirs: Anticipating that I will not be able to attend the hearing Friday evening Itne 20, at eight o'clock; I would like to offer my protest to the rezoning of all residentially-2onod property fronting on the south side of Bird Road between Red Road and Ludlum Road, to a business zoning. 1. Within the first block South of Bird Road between Std 61st Ct. and b1l 62nd Ct. there are twenty four children school age and only two that are in Senipr High School the rest being in Elementary School or younger. Two of these children ane mine. To rezone this section would make way for a section such as there is at Ludlum and Bird Reads on the north side. I can assure you that I have no intention of letting my children grow up in such an enviroment. The ppposition will probably argue that this C-1 or 0-2 zoning will not let anything like this happen, but I have seen fezoning work before and in a few years there will be Bar Rooms, ReQtu!rsnts with their garbage in the alleys, . etc. I have not made a personal survey of this strech of Bird Road but I would estimate there are at least two hundred children school age in this area. If these public minded citizens of our community want to improve our community why dont they offer to establish a park or play ground for the children of our city instead of making way for a glorified slum area. There are enough delinquient children in our world today. 2. My home is situated approximately two hundred and fifty feet from this proposed rezoning area and I feel without • doubt that to rezone would devaluate my properyy to • great extent. 3. liffe have the RID BIRD Section and the Ludlum Bird Section wEdeh is in walking distance for anyone on the Northern Boundry of South Miani. These are but three of the many reasons why I think that a rezoning of thid area not advisable. I,personally stand to lose a lot more than I could ever. gain, because of the un- healthy enviroment it would create for my children. Yours� truly, ,C. D. Albury 7.fzv-AArZ2TMAA1_ ff/0-ffrZff ATAFJVAY5r A5rYAK7XZ LATIN AMERICAN DIVISION, P.O. BOX 3311, MIAMI 31, FLORIDA June 18t 1952 Mr. H. Goo. Fink, Chairmans South Ifiami Advisory Zoning & Planning Boards P. 0. Box 867, Oath Jda=` 1 431 Fla. Dear Sirs- As residents and ovners of the property at 6211 S. VT. 42nd St.) South Miami, we oppose the rezoning of the residentiallponed property, both in the County and in South Miamis fronting on the South Side of Bird Road between Red and Ludlam Roads, to a business Zoning, for the following reasons 1. The neighborhood does not require andq in our opinions never will require , a commercial area beyond its present development and areas presently zoned for commercial purposes. Thisy we believesis particularly true of the area between 60th Ave, and 64th Ave.jas this section of South Miami mum is more than adequately served by the business areas located at Bird and Red Roads and Bird and Ludlam Roads. 2* Rezoning of this property I should not be considered without simultaneous consideration of the rezoning of the property fronting on the North of Bird Road and the County areas between Red and Ludlam fronting on the South of Bird Road. Should all or part of the County areas facing on either side of Bird Road be rezoned for businesst at some future dates we would consider it one of the advantages of being a part of South Hiami that they would not allow this commercial trespass in our residential area* 3. Due to its location at the most distant portion of an isolated section of South Miami, some two and one half miles from the center of the city proper, a commercial development in this area would serve only a small portion of the city's population and would, of necessityp draw the major portion of its bus- iness from adjacent areas outside of South Miami. We cite this only to im- press the fact that6A"a" business district is, primarily$ not for the convenience or necessity of the citizens of South Miami but, rather, for adjacent areas. 4. The only possible advantage to be gained by the city in rezoning this property would be in its potential tax revenue which would be more than offset by the inevitable degrading of the neighborhood and the ultimate decrease in the value of the adjacent residential property. 5. Even though the F. H. A. may not accept insurance co=itments for resi- dential loans on this property$ rezoning would only broaden the "no commit- ment" ared due to the adjacent commercial zoning and result in a shifting of this disadvantage 2ow from one group to a second group. This same condition exists in the Bird Road area in Coral Gabless a parallel case to that in questions and no one, at all acquainted with the administration of our sister community, would entertain serious thought of getting that area zoned for business. This is only one of many examples of property on busy thorofares . on which the F. H. A. will not insure loans for residences. It is one of lt=,/ Ssfem o)(deC-Tlyinf C/0 ens CLUNIA the well known disadvantages of OWAivg such property. Can any reasonable person contend that all property along all busy streets be rezoned for busi- ness just because it is a busy street and the F. H. A. will not insure a loan for a residence. 6. The applicant has contended that the establishment of business' at- Bird and Red Roads has established a precident for business' along the entire length of Bird Road from Red to Ludlam Roads. May we ask if it also estab� fishes a precident for the establishment of business' along the entire length Of Bird Road from Red to Le Jeune Roads) or along the entire length of Red Road from Bird to Sunset Roadsp or along the entire length of Red 2= Road from Bird Road to Coral tray? The answer is most obvious. Several attempts have been made in the past to rezone all, or part, of the area in qUpgtibn. All nuth &PPli6Aioftn, oxw+ f6r +ht Lu+keran Church A 6330 Bird Road, which is a credit to the community, and a residential Realty establishment at 6290 Bird Road, which has been a detriment to the community, have been denied. I do not have information as to the original zoning of the area at Bird and Red Roads. We are grateful to the officials of South Miami for these previous denials and for the several improvements, such as street paving said lighting and greatly improved sanitary service, made in this area in the past four years* We feel confident that the officials of South Miami will continue their i'nterest and respect for this area by keeping. it the splendid residential area for which it was intended) and which it is. Sincerely$ D7Wa7 cKee ��nQ � m� Sara E. McKee 14 -L st , J:L A "T MIAMI. Crandon wholesale Drug Go. Post Office Box 1711 Aami 10,Florida office Of the President June 24th, 1952 Hon. James H. 1IcConnell, Mayor, South Miami, Florida. Dear Mr. McConnell: As you know, I was present at the Zoning hearing a few nights ago, which had to do with a petition filed by someone to extend business on the south side of Bird Road from 58th Avenue to Lud- lum Road. I was not called upon to participate in the arguments, as of course was correct, because I am not a resident of South ' Miami; on the other hand, I thoroughly enjoyed the meeting, and I think I'll make it a point to be present at some more zoning meetings, .even tho I am a disinterested party. It is not only interesting, but entertaining, to hear the different points of view people have, and it is quite surprising to learn how familiar some people are with the zoning problems. You may not know it, but this writer is the tlFathertl of the County zoning Act. George Merrick and I worked for over a year on the original regulations, before the matter was submitted to the Legislature and the Board of County, Commissioners. Of course zoning has been changed in many, many instances since the original Act was passed; by and large however, I still feel it was a very necessary piece of legislation and that it has reacted constantly to the benefit of the community. I am glad the City of South Miami has worked so closely with the County Zoning Board and the County Commission, and vice versa, which is the way it should be, if we expect to have good zoning. In this particular case of the petitioner who wished to extend business from 58th Avenue to Ludlum Road, that would certainly be detrimental to that whole area. The type of zoning where selfish interests are permitted to string out business for a mile or so is very injurious, and is against the policies of the Zoning Board and the County Commission, and has been for many years. Hon. James H. McConnell Page 2 If you want to see an example of just what that sort of zoning does to a community Mr. Mayor, go up Red Road past my home to the corner of Coral Way and Red Road and then go north until you come to Tamiami Trail, and you will observe that this type of zoning has just about ruined that area. Business areas, wherever they are, should be restricted to just as small an area as is necessary to serve the community. These areas should never be permitted to string out along our highways. All of those people that protested against this particular zoning the other evening all recognized that, and many of them so stated - they had observed the result of this type of zoning. Several of the people who spoke against this petition referred to the fact that there is plenty of business at Red and Bird Road, which of course there is; as a matter of fact, I have over 500 feet of vacant business property there, just waiting for somebody to come along and want a builting erected there, which we are ready to do, all of which indicates the demand for busi- ness property has not yet filled the vacant business lots now available, and then too, right across the street from me we have all those small stores which have been vacant several times. I was glad to see Mr. Cook of the County Zoning Department pre- sent, which indicates his interest in all these fringe areas and his willingness to put himself out to follow through on these zoning matters connected with his office. As near as I have been able to observe, Mr. Cook and his staff have been doing a very excellent job.' Was glad to meet you Mr. McConnell, and noted you were using your genial talents and personality to "throw oil on troubled waters" and maintain harmonious relations with your city officials. InTith kindest personal regards, I remain Sincerely yours, i CHARLES H. CRANDON tJ.e Ckj tl,,: ate.. �,.�nA cl,c Gear 1444 Cecilia Ave., Coral Gables, Fla. June 19, 1952. CITY of SODT.n MI.901I, South Miami, Fla. ` Att. 1,b?. n. Geo. Fink, Chairman, South Miami Advisory & Planning Board. Dear Sir : I herewith acknowledge receipt of - "NOTICE OF PUBLIC nEARING BY TnE SOUTn MIAMI ADVISORY ZONING & PLANNING BOARD, Friday evening, June 20, .at 8:00 P.M. at the Comm. Bldg. on application of Virginia Daniels and others to rezone all residentially-zoned property fronting on the South side of Bird Road between Red Road and Ludlum Road to a Business Zoning ( C-1 and/or C-2 ) to permit developments similar to that allready established at Bird and Red". Reviewing this notice, it appears that there is no definite concrete plan for progressive- development of this area. The present Bird and Red Road business area is a fine nucleus for the beginning of a progressive business street and every effort should be made to continue this in plan by providing adequate parking space for each business and adhering to the general construction scheme as already established. however, this does not appear feasible under the general wording of the present application. I cannot attend the meeting on- June 20th, and therefore register my dis-approval of the application as written. I do not wish to take the position of standing in the way of well planned progress but I am sure there are many who dissapprove of a haphazard zoning which would depreciate the community in general. Therefore, I would consider approval of rezoning of this area for business if a definite progressive plan of development was agreed upon. A few suggestions follow: Business areas are now established at Bird & Red and Bird & Ludlum. Continue development progressively from Red Road Nest and from Ludlum Road East. Adhere to a reasonable set back from street for construction to provide for off-street parking and planting of trees and landscaping. Deviate from the conventional business building architecture in obder to have a community business area which will not be objectionable to the surrounding residences. Reasonable assurance that property not located in the City of South Miami in this area would eventually be zoned corresponding to the precedent' set by the City of South Mimi. Use discretion for approval. of such businesses only that would be considered appropriate for a residential business district. ti ♦ -_ I believe that most property owners will eventuallly be confronted with the possibility of this area being rezoned to business,therefore, a well established progressive program at this time would be worthy of consideration; rather than at a later date, be confronted with a rapid . business development which might not energetically solicit the recommendations of the neighborhood, Yours very tr y, + November 234, 1951 629a Is W- 40th St. Ma -i$ Florida Dear Madan: It has been brvught. to the Council's attention. that you .ars violating the Zoning Ordi:n,ane by the` display ok Adverti.s�► ing si€� ns can your premises at the above addyressgift a residential district, The records show that goer application for .a i comae to operate as a real estate broker from that location was granted on August; 16, 19-50 based. on S.ec. ' IX Subsection 1 of .Ordinance 98 which refers to hor.,ie occupations. offices and. studios in residence c3.i trios and orb rldes that "no adverb ng sign M or equipment are displayed fear advertising purposes, except that the name of. the occupant and the name oj" his or her prof o si.on may be displayed on a. sign not larger than four inches W') high in-ide one (1) windotrg or by an Approved sign not 3a rger than. one and one half (1j) square feet in area$ in the form of a name platep attached - to the bu.illing.' This is to notify you to remove ali signs except the one permi.ttod;per. sa.i.d ,sec. IX (1) of Ordinance 98 W tiro t�8rtja-eight 48) hours q in order that, we will not have to proceed with Court .action on these violati.ons,. Very truly 7ours, Gresham s Jr., Police Comm- s tamer C 177 OP SOUTH 111AMI Personal service by Off ice N Q • �iy Date- w " South Miami, Florida November 15, 1951 y City Council City of South Miami South Miami, Fla. Reference: Zoning Violation Virginia Daniels 6290 Bird Road South Miami, Fla. Gentlemen; Vie wish to call to your attention the operation of a Real Estate Office at the above address which is zoned residential. There are street signs and a blackboard advertising listings on this property. The Council is respectfully requested to see that there is no violation of the zoning which will tend to lower the value of this neighborhood from a residential standpoint. Yours truly, 7A- Z� -. Re: VIRGINIA DANIEIS occupational license From: Minutes of Council meeting,;' August 16, 1950 Under PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS. Item c',f' Krequest by Henry Fuller, attorney for Virginia Dan3iesl, for a place on the agenda to present her application for an occupa- tional license as realtor, In aecordance with See'' IX (1 of Ord" #9s'9; Auxiliary Uses;' which refers to home occupations, .office and studios in Residenee azA Apartipent Diztricts. Upon Mri. Fuller's assurance that Mrs. Daniels would observe the rules regarding igns V'. Councilman Corley, seconded by Councilman 9 Carballo, moved that her application for license be granted. Motion earried, ?,Te the undersigned hereby petition the at.thoritics having jLi isdiction overl;the zoning restrictions on the property located on the South Side of Bird Road and extending from Red Road to Ludlun Road. In this petition we request that the zoning be changed to High Class Business Use on any and all properties which are not already zoned for this use. We the undersigned are of the opinion that High Class nusinoss is the best use for this Property in view of the fact that Bird 'Road is becoming more and more heavily travelled liia4ing it undesirable for residential purposes. This section of Bird Road already has more ir;7provements of a business nature than of a residential nature. We are also advised that F.H. A. will no longer apnrove loans on this property for residential purposes, because of the traffic situation. Signatures of O-�rners of Legal Description of vacant or property in question Property, in South Miami irciproved Bernard S. Feiner Lot 19, Block 2, Bird Rd. vacant Ber 1. ar Realty Corp. Estates, Plat Bk 192 Pg. 76 1635 Washington Ave. Miami Beach, Fla. 7 Sue 1'. Moore Lot 5, Block 2 McKeever Ter. vacant Marathon, Florida Paul Albrecht Lot 22 Block 1 McKeever Terrace vacant 4304 W. 63rd Street and Lots 23 and 24 McKeever Chicago, Ill. Terrace Z,T. F. Walters 6262 S . W. 40th Street � hu.r.i e 6462 S. IT. 40th Street Acreage South i,liami, Fla. D.C. Fitzpatrick 6470 Bird Road office 4117 S. W. 65th ANE: Acreage South ITiami, Fla. Harry D. L. Kaye Lots 11 and 12 Block 1 vacant 2097 Ludoum Road of Westerfield Manor ;"-3 Virginia Daniels Lots 8,9,10, 11 Block 1 home 6290 Bird Road Bird Road Estates S. Miami, Fla. / Virginia Daniels Lots 122,3,415 Block 1 vacant 6290 Bird Road Bird Road Estates S. ?,Tiami, Fla. / Jean Kreiger Greens an Lots 124, and 5 v 420 Rivo Alto Island 11ci,, Block 1 vacant ,_eever Terrace Miami Beach, Fla. . Helen and Howard Wills Lot 13, Block 1 home 5802 Bird Road Westerfield Manor S. ?` ialnl, Fla. May L. Rotolante c/o Morat 1120 S. +,T. lst St. Lots 11 and 12 Block 2 v vacant iiarai, Fla. Bird Road Estates James J. O'Neil Lot 3 Block 1 S. Miami', Fla. McKeever Terrace home Allen B. 'Defibaugh Lots 1,2,3, Block 2 6144 S. W. 28th. Street McKeever Terrace, PI�9 pg 49 vacant Miami, rla. �I PETITION We, the undersigned property owners living within 1000 feet of Bird Road between Ludlum and Red Roads, hereby petition the South Miami Advisory Zoning and Planning Board to deny the application of Virginia Daniels and others to rezone all residentially-zoned property south of Bird Road and between Ludlum and Red Roads to Business Zoning. We hereby file notice of our objection to such re-zoning. 2L Vi 1. - 3�� - � �✓ 1 3 0 My . 11. 31.x' mil Y2 12. t V 13. 2?. 0/. 2ZL JA a1 Jail G � J J Q 35,244 , We 1 � undersigned hereby petition the authorities having jurisdiction 'over the zoning restricts Qns on the property located on the South Side of Bird Road and extending from Red Read to Ludlum Road. In thil peti- tiB. we request that the zoning be changed to High Class business use on any and all properties which are not already zoned for this use. We the undersigned are of the opinion that High Class business is the best use for this property in view of the fact that Bird Road is be- coming more and more heavily travelled making it undesirable for resi- dential purposes. This seetion of Bird Road already has more improve- ments of a business nature than of a residential nature. feet of property are now occupied by stores. feet of property are now occupied by residences. We are also advised that F.H.A. will no longer approve loans on this property for residential purposes, because of the traffic situation. legal description of vacant or Signed; by owner property owned improved. 4070 AAA NAME lip 40717G �Aaaress S '202 emu-- zaz . S Ati/��-t1 • of x.29, �, /Ti T let Alp- We the undersigned hereby petition the authoriti. � having jurisdiction over the zoning restrictions on the propei-1-0y lov,,.tQd ou i.1he South aide of Bird Road and e7ztmding from Red Road to Ludlum Road. In t1.is petition we request t114t the zoning be changed to High Class BusJ-nessC<Bl on any and all properties which are not already zoned for this use, We the undersigned are of the opinion that .High Class business is the best use for tl-da pr perty in view of the fact . that Bird Roc is becom- ing more xnd more heavily travelled nLking it undesirable for residential purposes. This section of Bird Road already has more improvements of a business nature than of a residential nature. feet of property :ire now occupied by stores or other business uses fert of DrQperty ono n w occupiea by residcnces . legal dcscriptian of vact,nt or Signed.- by owncr prDperty ovnied improvcd 22- 7, Ad Ad 47. ZZO r G � y-- t \. 'r• f TP the fLS°�A bllg X'e+f�t ietk-n v..+J'++1�^' pr 6§ihy wptru #Y L ho Slouft. SO or Sird U004 and vzltwding Be to 1�- I, that m coked t ft l On ww w a ' ; 4 "r A ark . � ,> Wo es �: the beat : for � � ' proport , a ,I . h �'� Viola ad S .of �� Tom,. � oti �o ` ' , o � rr pa . pr . by we are U9.11 t v A' - v ' l 0 Ig Agal yams. . U . ° .-. e a m e � , legal vae. zt igne - awns � p vto 7-.. _k i r n Op . . A 0 .1 ..� _ .wlm?eY!�!. G, wnM4�kA3A^ts44v9�� aq!rtwawm + r - - Atlor .19MO�_L——— VV_ AltlAA ��i•e'Heaa,wRw ,.... :4E!w� :,- goS.��'w �'M.+ - Frl'', _. #v _- _- _ .- _ - .,. ' Hart, Ens±w6ewav�k•-ar.��r.�w..in+;.Aiwawr�+g�wtxru..�npni..q+��rw�+s. .-. -� � - � .-. .. ._ .. - -, � _._.. - - .. .... over restxictlM2 tho pro-lyer ty ' oezo tc- the '.S .th Side r 1.1jrd Roiad and eztcnuWA& fruu Red hoed to ud: w- m WSy a i,wd ;.-.&I A7F'�iM��ti'�as' #F=Yr4... `lvdoai Gi�'-'6+�t� 5(r-('. rzV6l.# e- zoned V. e use fcm� tbi-11, p�-4port In- ' 14'#a'v-14'eau of the foot t ird is beopalr4 wre audz re ewvily ,, v ).7ed a g7v it =4ezirabj. � µ _ s- s his, #.;,, Bird, T,$o a i'+� $ id p om . ,��'''��l t.�5'3 �� 1 ♦yy�yk;'"�} �x' ��+.�.a.i'�s"i",�t �p�'� i � ��i �k'�� :.#. � '"s� � �Yir 9x145.M'X T.l` +IT Au:1 '�2. ¢p�'�,,y�{,>' I� Dire. jg�}p�f {"�y� qy ��¢y ey^}u - ""y' _Al1YU�f+3#N'X%1A:nYE i4awiFeY?�NM!W.sea iy. }A C Vii'AF. cs. igry`n3 r . 45.T�oo. ��1. A' '^.{�' i now oecupiea by atorcn- or fix, lj�4w, t ., � ..��. ..t..... _,ti., ._ __' . —!4 _ _..+ � ��S + i i _J a t � i �'r to� i � � •�,s ��.; � :i;i �i L,..�•lt.j. .�+ _ •.'. .'.-.- V .. .y 6:,'.� .�r•.fi.7,�—.t—:,.:,� #i�' � _art„ �: i..l i�, .� ��'...5..1�..+ •�.i.�'L�«.�..�f.. �.".�� at- '{ i..' 4'• �;,_v ..ti:'�,r: .... .. .3 ..'.s i, »`,C, ai.1 .:._T.ir.1 :,.1. 3 t*: 1 ,,:. .F4;r,d'.w.d.:a: .�.e' �`10 .t. It IC-� Wit! 1,'t ' ".r �'� iry' ..t' +' , x�la l t `;,. :a : °!,, .1 'e?'', . ,L i; , ;. '• yr 'r n t 3: j.l �.' {F f' twt �.i "J �*' •.1 �.��.:_,A�4.,i,. t l.. .1 ..��6, R..� ,'.•3 11�.k l._ �.�\.c'-51.,..' _.:fttu�.�T:� i.t .t.7i� �)�_ 'f l . �'•�S f•} L7�M' !W4Y.A. o, IVY}/t ,w• �Ir��/��/'({��//(�/� ......... .�,�_ .� •+.M.Mwrr�Y�W�, �r �' a�,/!•++••r +�Y ye•+�•WI -1.4. NwF VIMYw14iMr R.H.A.'..m�Y.r . • ' t cu `�"� ..�f yi.��a-1.-aK+.•-+.Twa Yr•rMw•._ y.wyl.+MYr.Maw..•w N.Y JM.+w�Jr•tYr ' •••Mrrw..i�-.iir....Mrw� rvr-+ir.. •+�,.. t.wr Fr! K".. ..•F�rt.nr r - ..�.r-. Frr .i. r .i.w! ♦L.../i.W.._.�•+�+�w.. T K.+WIMrl�.ni.ir+r, +ww.irw+ ..rw� M�.w�•i�rr' .YYfJ- i.�r.` r.r.�� «may. - ..u'�iY.�rl�.�F�r.r..►R l.w�Yw��e.a 3y. •�� .......,q.terra.►+r Y�l°a►..1. i — — "„� Y.w+Yrw. 1►-A.1/�wiM++�r .M,.eM.�MI.�.l�.ww1 MiFMw�Y.�Y.Y.Y.��Y1.F• - — - .ar w.wa.�wry.yMy..,,�ry �„ _ —. •Ji JY1aYl�a.c'.—l.rrM al.�l• +w•+�1w� r tirY.�l