Loading...
5959 SW 71 ST_PB-89-023 RESOLUTION NO. 189 -8 9-9016. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI , FLORIDA, GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR AN EATING ESTABLISHMENT IN AN MO DISTRICT, AND GRANTING VARIANCES TO ALLOW COLUMNS WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACK; TO ALLOW ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES TO BE SOLD WITHIN 1, 000 FEET OF OTHER LICENSED ESTABLISHMENTS; TO ALLOW THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITHIN 1, 000 FEET OF RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY; AND TO GRANT A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A REDUCTION OF OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES BY 50 PERCENT ON PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 8- 13, BLOCK 13 OF ROSSWOOD SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED AT PLAT BOOK 13, PAGE 62, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA A/K/A 5959, 5961 AND 5965 S. W. 71ST STREET AND 5952 AND 5956 S. W. 70TH STREET, SOUTH MIAMI , FLORIDA. Agenda Item PB-89--23 WHEREAS, the applicant has requested variances to allow an arcade, to sell alcoholic beverages and for special use permits to reduce parking requirement and have an eating establishment and the .staff recommendation is that the project is consistent with the spirit of the Comprehensive Plan and would be a valuable addition to the City; and WHEREAS, at a public hearing on November 14, 1989, the Planning Board voted 3-2 to deny the arcade; 3-2 to deny both variances to permit the sale of alcoholic beverages with 1, 000 of other licensed establishments and residences; 4-1 to deny the reduction of parking spaces and 5-0 to approve the special use permit for an eating establishment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI , FLORIDA: Section 1 . That a variance to allow columns within the 15 front .wetback on property legally described as: Lots 8-13, Block 13 of ROSSWOOD SUBDIVISION, according to the Flat thereof, as recorded at Flat Book 13, Page 62, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, a/k/a 5959, 5961 and 5965 S. W. 71st Street and 5952 and 5956 S. W. 70th Street, South Miami , Florida is hereby granted. Section 2. That a variance to allow alcoholic beverages to be served within 1, 000 feet of other licensed establishments on the above-described property is hereby granted, conditioned on the 1 license being for on-premise and restaurant consumption only. Section 3. That a variance to allow alcoholic beverages to be .served within 1, 000 feet of residential property on the above- described property is hereby granted upon the same conditions contained in Section 2 above. Section 4. That a special use permit to allow a reduction by fifty percent of required off-street parking spaces on the above-described property is hereby granted, upon the condition that the hotel use remains on the property. Section 5. That a special use permit to allow an eating establishment on the above-described property is hereby granted. Section G. That the drawings and plans presented at the City Commission public hearing and marked by the Director of Building, Zoning and Community Development shall be made part of the application and the final approved plans shall be in substantial conformity therewith. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of December 1989. APPROVE ATTEST MAYOtl C j CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY Reso 1 ut',.5959SW71ST 4) Mr. Ray Kincaid , 5801 S .W. 83rd Street , spoke in favor of the request stating he had no objections to the improvements being made. 5) Mr. Mark Radosevich, 5703 S .W. 83rd Street , stated he felt the improvements were excellent and increased the surrounding property values . 6) Mr. John Leonardo, 7528 S .W. 83 Street , stated he is glad to see the Commission take the time to consider the matter and realize the definition of "fence" does not pertain in this matter. 7) Mr. David Tucker, 6611 S .W. 78th Terrace, spoke in favor of the request . No one else wished to speak and the public hearing was deemed closed . Moved by Commissioner McCann , seconded by Commissioner Launcelott , the resolution be amended to state an enclosed lattice structure to be constructed 5 ' into the 15 ' side setback and all places on the resolution stating "deny" be changed to "grant". Motion passed 4/0: Vice-Mayor Schwait , yea; Commissioner Brown, yea; Commissioner McCann, yea; Commissioner Launcelott , yea (Mayor Porter absent) . Motion on resolution, as amended, passed 4/0: Vice-Mayor Schwait, yea; Commissioner Brown, yea; Commissioner McCann, yea; Commissioner Launcelott , yea (Mayor Porter absent) . #5 RESOLUTION NO. 139-89-4016 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR AN EATING ESTABLISHMENT IN A MO DISTRICT, A DENYING VARIANCES TO ALLOW AN ARCADE WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACK, TO ALLOW ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES TO BE SOLD WITHIN 1 ,000 FEET OF OTHER LICENSED ESTABLISHMENTS ; TO ALLOW THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITHIN 1 ,000 FEET OF RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY; AND TO ALLOW A REDUCTION OF OFF STREET PARKING SPACES BY 50 PERCENT ON PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 8-13 , BLOCK 13 , ROSSWOOD SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED AT PLAT BOOK 13, PAGE 62 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, A/K/A 5961 AND 5965 S .W. 71ST STREET, AND 5952 AND 5956 S.W. 70TH STREET, SOUTH MIAMI , FLORIDA. CCM -8- 12/05/89 rjn Moved by Commissioner McCann, seconded by Commissioner Brown the resolution be adopted and assigned the next number by the City Clerk. Vice-Mayor Schwait deemed public hearing to be in session and requested anyone wishing to speak for or against the request to please step forward at this time. 1 ) Mr. Robert Wayne , 1225 S .W. 87th Avenue, and Mr. Alfredo Julian, architect, explained the project site plan and background of the application. The proposed entrance will he on S .W. , 71st Street ; the hotel will have arcade stores which are accessible only through the hotel and a pool area, restaurant and courtyard, all also accessible through the hotel . Commissioner McCann said she would like any approval of the project to contain a stipulation that interior plans , as shown, is what will be built and those plans be marked and labeled for Environmental Review and Preservation Board approval . Applicant stated this would be acceptable . Commissioner McCann stated she would prefer the use of the word "columns" rather than just an arcade to clearly explain that arcade , in the setback area, will not be a solid structure. Mr. Wayne addressed the parking variance noting that most people visiting the hotel will be from other countries and will be on a 'tour bus ' . Also, the South Miami Code does have specific provisions for establishments within 500 ' of Metrorail , and the hotel does fit into that category . Commissioner McCann asked the approval to contain a stipulation that if the use changes from hotel to office in the future, the parking variance can be revisited . City Attorney Dellagloria stated the resolution can delineate the special use is conditioned upon this use remaining. Mr. Wayne and Mr. Julian so stipulated. Vice-Mayor Schwait read Planning Board recommendations into the record: 2/3 to approve arcade 2/3 to approve sale of alcoholic beverages within 1 ,000 feet of another establishment serving alcoholic beverages 2/3 to approve sale of alcoholic beverages within 1 ,000 feet of residential property 5/0 to approve special use permit for an eating establishment in an MO district 4/1 to deny special use permit to reduce the required number of off-street parking spaces by 507 CCM -9- 12/05/89 rjn Y 2) Ms . Claudia Hauri , 5752 S .W. 77th Terrace , spoke as a resident and Chairperson of the Safe Neighborhood District Improvement Board asking the Commission to deny the parking variance as the City already has a parking problem. 3) Mr. Bob Berkowitz , owner of building next door at 7000 S.W. 59th Place, stated the area is blighted and the hotel would be an improvement. However, his business is a video business and he is concerned with noise. Commissioner Launcelott also voiced concern with noise levels from sanitation services to the hotel . Mr. Wayne explained the area will be heavily landscaped as a buffer and all traffic will be on the side away from the residential portion of the community and the side which is, also away from Mr. Berkowitz ' s studio . 4) Mr. Luis Rosen, owner of the building directly west of the hotel site agreed this is a good use for the property and is an improvement over the present vacant lot . No one else wished to speak and the public hearing was deemed closed. Moved by Commissioner McCann, seconded by Vice-Mayor Schwait, the resolution be amended to add another section stating that the drawings and plans presented 'to the City Commission, pages 1 -5, at the City Commission meeting of December 5, 1989, shall be marked and made part of the application by the City' s Building & Zoning Director . Motion passed 4/0 : Vice-Mayor Schwait , yea; Commissioner Brown, yea; Commissioner McCann, yea; Commissioner Launcelott , yea (Mayor Porter absent) . Moved by Commissioner McCann, seconded by Vice-Mayor Schwait, Section 1 . of the resolution be amended to state: "That a variance to allow columns within the front setback, as approved by the Environmental—Re v w & Preservation Board Motion passed 4/0: Vice-Mayor Schwait , yea , Commissioner Brown, yea; Commissioner McCann, yea; Commissioner Launcelott , yea (Mayor Porter absent) . CCM - 10- 12/05/89 rjn Commissioner McCann requested that the parking variance be tied into the hotel use . City Attorney Dellagloria stated Section 4 of the resolution can be amended to so state "as long as the hotel use and parking requirements for property in 500 ' proximity to Rapid Transit continues" also, the word "denied" may be amended to "grant". Moved by Vice-Mayor Schwait , seconded by Commissioner Brown, approval is granted conditioned that the hotel use remain on the property and the user relationship to Rapid Transit continues . Motion failed 2/2 : Vice-Mayor Schwait , yea; Commissioner Brown, yea; Commissioner McCann, nay; Commissioner Launcelott , nay (Mayor Porter absent) . Moved by Vice-Mayor Schwait , seconded by Commissioner Brown, Section 4. to amended to state: "The Special Use Permit is granted conditioned upon hotel use remaining on the property". Motion passed 4/0: Vice-Mayor Schwait , yea; Commissioner Brown, yea; Commissioner McCann, yea; Commissioner Launcelott, yea (Mayor Porter absent) . Moved by Commissioner McCann, seconded by Vice-Mayor Schwait all places in resolution which state "deny" be amended to "grant". Vice-Mayor Schwait removed his second to the motion. Moved by Commissioner McCann, seconded by Commissioner Brown, the resolution be amended so heading and body are amended to state "grant" rather than "deny" except for Planning Board recommendations . Motion passed 4/0: Vice-Mayor Schwait , yea ; Commissioner Brown, yea; Commissioner McCann, yea; Commissioner Launcelott , yea (Mayor Porter absent) . Moved by Commissioner McCann, seconded by Commissioner Brown , the variance specifically state "columns" will be in the 15 ' front setback. Motion passed 4/0: Vice-Mayor Schwait , yea; Commissioner Brown, yea; Commissioner McCann, yea; Commission Launcelott, yea (Mayor Porter absent) . Moved by Commissioner Brown , seconded by Vice-Mayor Schwait, Section 2. of the resolution be amended to provide consumption of alcoholic beverages is only on premises and only in the restaurant and the hotel will not contain 'a bar' . The provisions of this motion were stipulated by the applicant: on premises in the restaurant only and no bar on the premises . CCM -11- 12/05/89 rjn t ' Motion passed 4/0: Vice-Mayor Schwait , yea ; Commissioner Brown, yea; Commissioner McCann, yea ; Commissioner Launcelott , yea (Mayor Porter absent) . Section 3. to serve alcoholic beverages within 1 ,000 ' of a residential property was passed 4/0: Vice-Mayor Schwait , yea; Commissioner Brown, yea ; Commissioner McCann, yea; Commissioner Launcelott , yea (Mayor Porter absent) . Moved by Commissioner Brown, seconded by Vice-Mayor Schwait , to reduce parking requirement by 50% as long as hotel usage remains in effect . Motion passed 4/0 : Vice-Mayor Schwait , yea ; Commissioner Brown, yea; Commissioner McCann, yea; Commissioner Launcelott , yea (Mayor Porter absent) . Moved by Commissioner McCann, seconded by Commissioner Brown , applicant be granted a special use permit for an eating establishment. Motion passed 4/0 : Vice-Mayor Schwait , yea; Commissioner Brown, yea; Commissioner McCann, yea; Commissioner Launcelott , yea (Mayor Porter absent) . Motion on resolution, as amended, passed 4/0: Vice-Mayor Schwait , yea; Commissioner Brown, yea; Commissioner McCann, yea; Commissioner Launcelott , yea (Mayor. Porter absent) . RESOLUTIONS : #11 RESOLUTION NO . 145-89-9022 A RESOLUTION URGING METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY NOT TO WIDEN SOUTHWEST 56TH STREET (MILLER DRIVE) FROM 67TH AVENUE TO 57TH AVENUE IN THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI , FLORIDA. Moved by Commissioner McCann, seconded by Vice-Mayor Schwait, the resolution be adopted and assigned the next number by the City Clerk. Commissioner McCann noted the Comprehensive Plan addresses this area as single family residential and Miller Drive, in that area, goes only to the University of Miami. Motion passed 3/1 : Vice-Mayor Schwait, yea; Commissioner Brown, yea; Commissioner McCann , yea; Commissioner Launcelott, nay (Mayor Porter absent) . Commissioner Brown requested a copy of the resolution be sent to Dade County Commission so they are informed of the City' s wishes . CC:M - 12- 12/05/89 rjn _ T,HIS APIPI C' DER 42-001 Pt;� y Rev. 1 7/91 STATE OF FLORIDA Department of Business Regulation Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE AND CIGARETTE PERMIT WX SECTION I BUSINESS TELEPHONE # TYPE OF LICENSE/PERMIT DESIRED: Check Appropriate Boxes (x) Alcoholic Beverage License ( ) Cigarette Permit TYPE OF APPLICATION: Check Appropriate Boxes (x) New ( ) Change of Location ( ) Change of Business Name (x) New —Temporary Temporary ( ) Change of Officers/Stockholders ( ) Transfer ( ) Change in Series ( ) Correction ( ) Transfer - Temporary ( ) Decrease in Series ( ) Other ( ) Change of Location ( ) Increase in Series TYPE OF APPLICANT: Check Appropriate Box and List Charter Number, If Applicable ( ) Individual ( ) Partnership (x) Corporation ( ) Limited Partnership ( ) Charter Number M59159 1. Applicant's Full Name: Secisa International Ltda. , Inc. 2. Business Name: Miami Villa Hotel 3. Location Address: 5959 S.W. 71st Street, South Miami, FL 33143 Street City State Zip 4. Mailing Address: same as above Street City State Zip If application is for a NEW-license/permit, questions 5-8 are not applicable. 5. Current Owner's Name: 6. Current Business Name: 7. Current Location Address: Street City State Zip 8 Current License/Permit Number: Current Series: 9. Series of Licenses/Permits Desired: ( 4COPS ) AND ( )• 10. Complete the following if you are an applicant for a quota, special or club alcoholic beverage license. The license is issued pursuant to 561.20 , Florida Statutes or Special Acts, and as such we acknowledge the following minimum requirements must be met and maintained: 50 transient rooms (1) 11. Does your business include the preparation, service or sale of food? yes If .yes, have you registered with the Division of Hotels and Restaurants as a Public Food Service Establishment? VeS License/Control # SECTION II (A). List below the names, titles and interest for all officers, directors, stockholders, limited partners and general partners of the business for which this license or permit is sought. (Attach extra sheets if necessary). TITLE/POSITION NAME STOCK President: Elias A.S.F. Barreto Vice President: Secretary: Elias A.S.F. Barreto Treasurer: Elias A.S.F. Barreto Stockholder: Elam Holdings, Inc. 100 Directors: Elias A.S.F. Barreto 25% Alvaro Barreto 25% Luis Barreto 25% Mario Barreto 25% (B). List below the names and type of interest (i.e. lender, ,joint account holder, co-signer.) for all persons or entities not listed in part (A) above, who have an interest, directly or indirectly, in this application or the business for which the license/permit is sought. This may include a spouse, corporations, or any form ' of entity which is connected with the business. NAME TYPE OF INTEREST a (2) ti SECTION III 1. SALES TAR: Owners Name: Secisa International Ltda. , Inc. Business Name: Miami Villa Hotel A. Disclosure Authorization. Section A is to be Completed By Owner Only if Transfer of Alcoholic Beverage License. I hereby authorize the Department of Revenue to release to the aforementioned applicant and to the Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco the current status of my account Sworn to and Subscribed before me this day of , 19 Owner or Authorized Corporate - - Officer Must be Notarized Notary Public My Commission Expires: B. Disclosure. Section B is to be Completed by Department of Revenue. 23-08-376109-39 1. This is to verify that the current owner as named in this application has filed all returns and that all outstanding billings and returns have been paid through the period ending or the liability has been acknowledged and agreed to be paid by the applicant. This verification does not constitute a certificate as contained in Section 212.10(1), F.S. (Not applicable if no transfer involved). 2. Furthermore, the named applicant for an Alcoholic Beverage License has complied with Florida Statutes concerning registration for Sales and Use Tax, and has paid any applicable taxes due. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE STAMP Signed Title (Date) (3) Business. Name: Miami Villa Hotel Location Address: 5959 SW 71st Street, South Miami, FL 33143 SECTION IV (NOTE: THE DIVISION DOES NOT REQUIRE THAT ITEMS 1-3 BE COMPLETED IN ORDER) 1. ZONING: If this application is for the issuance of an alcoholic beverage license where zoning approval is required, the zoning authority must complete "A" and "B". If this application is for the issuance of an alcoholic beverage license where zoning approval is not required, the applicant must complete section "B". To be completed by the Local Zoning Authorities. A. The location ( x ) Does Comply ( ) Does Not Comply with zoning requirements for the sale of alcoholic beverages pursuant to this application for a Series 4COPS alcoholic beverage license. Signed: Title: (�NN�7� Date: 1 ZG A� B. Is location within the limiOf n Incorporated City or Town? ( x ) YES ( ) NO If "YES", Name of City or Town South Miami 2. HEALTH: A. To be completed by the Division of Hotels and Restaurants, the County Health Authority or Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services. The above establishment ( x) Does Comply ( ) Does Not Comply with the requirements of the Florida Sanitary Code. Signed: Date: Titles - Agency: - -- 3. RIGHT OF OCCUPANCY ' (YES) (NO) A. Does applicant have a legal right of occupancy to the premises?..... x B. Does applicant own the property?.................. .................. x C. Does applicant rent, lease or sublease the property?...... .......... x Name of Landlord: - Address of Landlord: Terms of Rental Agreement: (4) (REV.1/91) a[ zJ 10f.1- ,��S STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-1012 E RECEIPT FOR LICENSE %WV-E'V Lll TYPE OF TRANSACTION CONTROL NUMBER INSERT ONE NUM APPROVALS 1 2 E] 6 13 7 1:1 COUNTY FILE NUMBER H R T C CONDOS D.O. D.S. N ITEM BACK TEMP - CHANGE 1 i RECEIPT A B ❑ C ❑ D ❑ {�i �::_ rikf� :. :i{�_. I N.�- r. 02 REASONS YEA 1: OWNER RENEWAL YEAR YEAR OWNER 03 LICENSE FEE S yy LATE RENEWAL J$ TOTAL FEE $ MODE OF PAYMENT COLLECTED t �'� ' co FEE COLLECTED � �jC�•Du� Zq 3� Z (U, ACTUAL OPEN RECEIPT L Z SALES TAX 04 DATE MO. DAY YR. BUSINESS MO. DAY YR. HO5 NUMBER ? 7 3 ( �j ISSUE LICENSE TO 06 NAME OF OWNER 4 AJ I r Lz I ld A 71 ( 1,-> A ( . 1 G , i li.JL 07 NAME OF PRESIDENT _ IF CORPORATION _► f� K ( C L ( '1 11 08 BUSINESS NAME 09 BUILDING ❑ N ZI S STREET STREET NUMBER =� l0E;F1W NO. - j NAME 10 BUSINESS CITY 11 BUSINESS _ m i /iii ( ZIP CODE '� ! 12 BUSINESS _ f 13 FOOD Z❑ G 1:1 0 El El PHONE (p L- 'I �� ;� (n SERVICE SEATING ZERO SEATS MFDV TEMP 14 RENTAL UNITS OR I 15 CLASS 1❑ 2 3❑ 4❑ 5❑ 6❑ 7❑ 8❑ 9❑ SEATING CAPACITY { APT TL MTL FOOD RMH CONDO-1 TRANSIENT CONDO-G CONDO-C BEVERAGE YES El TYPE _ 16 LICENSE NO El LICENSE LICENSE NO. 17 MOBILE FOOD ID N0. 18 MAILING NAME i9 MAILING ADDRESS i 20 MAILING 21 MAILING ZIP CITY STATE CODE FEDERAL EMPLOYER'S _ _ NOT NOT AREA NUMBER OF INSPECTOR + %� 22 IDENTIFICATION N0. .t REQ. AVAIL 23 ASSIGNED TO THIS ACCOUNT 24 FOOD SERVICE ASSOCIATED 1 FREE 2 GROCERY 3 FAST 4 IDENTIFICATION WITH LODGING STANDING STORES FOOD RESTAURANT CATERING (A) El THEME PARK (C) El ORIENTAL (E) El MEXICAN(G) 11 GREEK (I) El AMERICAN (K) 13 25 CLASSIFICATION COMMISSARY (B)❑ VENDING (D) ❑ ITALIAN (F) ❑ HISPANIC (H) ❑ SEAFOOD (J) El CAFETERIA (L) ❑ THEATRE (M) 11 ASSOCIATED COUNTY FILE NUMBER I H SER OTHER (N) ❑ 26 CONTROL N0. SPRINKLER YES❑ YES❑❑ SMOKE IYESE] YES❑ HEARING YES❑ YES❑ BALCONY YES ❑ 27 REQ. NO El INST. NXT❑ DET. REQ. NO ❑ INST NO DI IMP. REQ. NO ❑ AVAIL NO ❑ 28 REQ. NO ❑ INSPECTOR APPLICATION SIGNATURE TITLE SIGNATURE ;'% OR REPRESENTATIVE APPROVALS AGENT NAME,IF VERBAL APPROVAL O HRS FORMER OWNER'S NAME FORMER BUSINESS ADDRESS APPROVED COMMISSARY BUSINESS COMMISSARY NAME ADDRESS (REV._-,o1. 4k lu Ib4 STATE OF FLORIDA = E DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-1012 ` RECEIPT FOR LICENSE 1)WE ` 1-11 ENbE TYPE OF TRANSACTION CONTROL NUMBER INSERT ONE NUOOBER 1 f4 APPROVALS s,�, 2 El El El FILE NUMBER H R T C CONDOS D.O. D.S. NEW ITEM BACK TEMP CHANGE 1`- RECEIPT A B ❑ C ❑ D ❑ 02 REASONS FULL CHG.OF RENEWAL YEAR YEAR OWNER LICENSE FEE $ LATE RENEWAL $ TOTAL FEE $ 03 COLLECTED J.J v FEE COLLECTED ! f �� MODE OF PAYMENT RECEIPT I L G ? ACTUAL OPEN % h: SALES TAX I- 06 DATE FOR .L 04 DATE MO. DAY YR. BUSINESS MO. DAY YR. 05 NUMBER ISSUE LICENSE TO NAME OF OWNER L s N 07 NAME OF PRESIDENT IF CORPORATION s "T i L, ! "1 08 BUSINESS NAME fVj ft ml 1 U ( r✓ i i 1 09 BUILDING _ ❑ NOS STREET STREET NUMBER �A '� ❑ E a W NO. NAME ` BUSINESS _ 10 BUSINESS CITY �/ m 11 ZIP CODE ? BUSINESS FOOD Z1:1 G❑ 0❑ P❑ 12 PHONE b �_. - v ' 1SERVICE SATING ZERO SEATS MFDV TEMP RENTAL UNITS OR 1 E 20 31-1 4 E 5 E 6 E 7 E 8❑ 9❑ 14 SEATING CAPACITY L 15 CLASS APT HTL MTL FOOD RMH COND0-1 TRAANRSISNT CONDO-G CONDO-C BEVERAGE YES❑ BEVERAGE _ 16 LICENSE NO El LICENSE LICENSE NO. 17 MOBILE FOOD ID NO. 18 MAILING NAME I i9 MAILING ADDRESS 20 MAILING MAILING ZIP _ CITY 21 STATE CODE FEDERAL EMPLOYER'S _ NOT NOT AREA NUMBER OF INSPECTOR 22 IDENTIFICATION N0. - '^ ' ^; REQ. AVAIL 23 ASSIGNED TO THIS ACCOUNT > 24 FOOD SERVICE ASSOCIATED 1 FREE 2 GROCERY 3 FAST 4 IDENTIFICATION WITH LODGING STANDING STORES FOOD RESTAURANT CATERING (A) ❑ THEME PARK (C) 1:1 ORIENTAL (E) ❑ MEXICAN (G) ❑ GREEK (1) ❑ AMERICAN (K) El 25 CLASSIFICATION COMMISSARY (B) ❑ VENDING (D)❑ ITALIAN (F) ❑ HISPANIC (H) ❑ SEAFOOD (J) ❑ CAFETERIA (L)❑ THEATRE (M) 11 ASSOCIATED COUNTY FILE NUMBER T ONE I OTHER (N) ❑ 26 CONTROL NO SPRINKLER YES❑ YES❑ SMOKE YES❑ YES❑ HEARING YES❑ YES❑ BALCONY YES ❑ 27 REQ. NO ❑ INST. No ❑ DET. REQ. NO ❑ INST NO ❑ IMP. REQ. NO ❑ AVAIL NO ❑ 28 REQ. NO ❑ XT_[] INSPECTOR ^: APPLICATION SIGNATURE �- TITLE SIGNATURE OR REPRESENTATIVE APPROVALS AGENT NAME, IF VERBAL APPROVAL O HRS FORMER OWNER'S NAME FORMER BUSINESS ADDRESS APPROVED COMMISSARY BUSINESS COMMISSARY NAME ADDRESS 22-006 (RE A 19763 'fKE (REV.t/911 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-1012 RECEIPT FOR LICENSE LICENSE TYPE OF TRANSACTION CONTROL NUMBER INSERT ONE NUMBER APPROVALS OF COUNTY FILE NUMBER H I R I T Fc CONDOS D.O. D.S. 1 2 El El El N W ITEM BACK TEMP 2 CHANGE 23 02 RECEIPT A F LL B 0 C CHG. D ❑ MAKE CHANGES ONLY IF APPLICABL REASONS RENEWAL YEAR YEAR OWNER LICENSE FEE $ LATE RENEWAL $ TOTAL FEE $ MODE OF PAYMENT 03 COLLECTED 111 .00 0 FEE COLLECTED •ao7 10-43-5 RECEIPT 4_ Z t ACTUAL OPEN Z�j 05 SALES TAX _ _ _ 04 DATE MO. DAY YR. BUSINESS MO. DAY YR. NUMBER D ISSUE LICENSE TO 06 NAME OF OWNER `� C. S T F_Ix-IJ A I 41L . IL- -lvi. NAME OF PRESIDENT 07 IF CORPORATION i-), A K- (-Jr I J L I A r 08 BUSINESS NAME L- v L L L 09 BUILDING ❑ N S STREET STREET NUMBER 1:1 E 5W NO. ` NAME 10 BUSINESS CITY 5 M } lAmi BUSINESS _ 11 ZIP CODE 12 BUSINESS _ 13 FOOD Z❑ G 0❑ P❑ PHONE � (� SERVICE SEATING ZE ZEATS MFDV TEMP 14 RENTAL UNITS OR 1 El 1:1 3 E3 40 5 El El 7❑ 8 El El SEATING CAPACITY 15 CLASS APT HTL MTL 60D RMH CONDO-1 TRANSIENT CONDO-G CONDO-C BEVERAGE I YES❑ BEVERAGE _ 16 LICENSE NO ❑ TYPE LICENSE NO. 17 MOBILE FOOD ID NO. SPECK:'_ MAILING ADDRESS OTHER THAN BUSINES--- ADDRESE. I~ ADPLICABL= 18 MAILING NAME 19 MAILING ADDRESS 20 MAILING 21 STATE MAILING CODE CITY I TT I I I I I FEDERAL EMPLOYER'S _ NOT NOT AREA NUMBER OF INSPECTOR 22 IDENTIFICATION N0. b �? C� Z. '- REQ. AVAIL 23 ASSIGNED TO THIS ACCOUNT 1 24 FOOD SERVICE ASSOCIATED 1 . FREE 2 GROCERY 3 FAST 4 IDENTIFICATION WITH LODGING STANDING STORES FOOD RESTAURANT CATERING (A) ❑ THEME PARK (C) ❑ ORIENTAL (E) ❑ MEXICAN(G)❑ GREEK (I) ❑ AMERICAN (K) ❑ 25 CLASSIFICATION COMMISSARY (B) ❑ VENDING (D)❑ ITALIAN (F) ❑ HISPANIC (H)❑ SEAFOOD(J) El CAFETERIA (L) ❑ THEATRE (M) ❑ ASSOCIATED COUNTY FILE NUMBER =RT OTHER (N) ❑ 26 CONTROL NO. P.EOUIRED Ok CLASSES - - . 6 .AID' SPRINKLER YE S❑ T �No ES❑ SMOKE IYES13 L. YES❑ HEARING YES❑ YBALCONY YES ❑ 27 REQ. NO ❑ INS . XT❑ DET.REQ. NO ❑ INST NO ❑ IMP. REQ. NO ❑ AVAIL NO OR: REQ. NO ❑ INSPECTOR % APPLICATION SIGNATURE TITLE SIGNATURE %��.'�l OR REPRESENTATIVE APPROVALS AGENT NAME,IF VERBAL APPROVAL —T" . 6 DOCUI._ - O HRS FORMER OWNER'S NAME FORMER BUSINESS ADDRESS APPROVED COMMISSARY BUSINESS COMMISSARY NAME ADDRESS DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION t Q THE JOHNS BUILDING 725 SOUTH BRONOUGH STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-1000 Lawton Chiles, Governor Please reply to: Janet Ferris, Secretary Division of Hotels and Restaurant 8405 N.W. 53rd St. , Suite C-240 Miami, FL 33166 NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL FOOD SERVICE SANITATION REQUIREMENTS Reference: Florida Statutes, Chapter 561. 17 (2) OWNERS NAME: S�LIS� i^17�rc.AlftTfc�NAc- LTD . BUSINESS NAME: M1,4144 IL-A .No-rEt BUS I NESS ADDRESS: $y 5q $. t,U • -) I S7. 5 • M I►q ryl I , F�-• DBR LICENSE NO: -2-3— This is to certify that the above named establishment has been inspected by a Sanitation and Safety Specialist from the Division of Hotels and Restaurants, and meets all state and local food service sanitation and safety regulations as of the below date for the consumption of alcoholic beverages on premises. Datdi Z3 / San ' tatio nd afety Specialist Div sio o els and Restaurants NOTE: This form, when completed, must be brought to the Division of Hotels and Restaurants at the above address, together with Application Form Number DBR 42-001, State of Florida Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco. Office of the Secretary• Division of Hotels and Restaurants • Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco Division of Florida Land Sales, Condominiums & Mobile Homes • Division of Pari•Mutuel Wagering LEGAL NOTICE • . , ? sue.a Florida - '^ ¢, ' Department of Business Regulation I Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services ' ��•.. Division of Hotels and Restaurants State Health Office/Office of Restaurant Programs FOOD SERVICE INSPECTION REPORT OWNER 5CC15A r G.TO � BUSINESS 140 !44 G CO. FILE NUMBER ADDRESS S9 S.W 11 ST. CITY �• l�m� INSPECTION Hao DAY Y R IN OUT OHR MRS Restaurant ofum is Caterer O MFDV DATE 2.1 �^ � Vending O TPFC Seati Tempura 0 Failure to comply with the Notice will rests t in a Hearing to determine whether or not your license will be suspended, revoked or an administrative fine of up to$1000 per violation imposed. WARNING WARNING OF DIRECT NOTICE NOTICE TO SHOW CAUSE Violations in the operation Failure to be in compliance with this notice at any You will be issued a Notice to Show Cause of your establishment must future inspection may result in a direct Notice to sanctions should not be assessed against y. corrected by: Show Cause. lick.A hearing will beheld at a time and se NEXT ROUTINE BY j be designated by.the Director. INSPECTION OR O MO. DAY , YR. ITEMS MARKED WITH AN ASTERISK I')ARE AREAS OF CRITICAL CONCERN IN THE OPERATION OF YOUR ESTABLISHMENT. VIOLATION VIOLATION VIOLATION FOOD FOOD EQUIPMENT&UTENSILS toono LIGHTING O •01 source:sound condition.no spoil". ❑ TT Food oomaee iurteoes of aquipnwrt end uteruse sail.free ❑ s LV7tM povtdatl ea eequhad,filatures shields, ❑ 02 Or9nai container:prpprly tabaled Of�a'"w'�ts VENTILATION ❑PROTECTION 21 Non-acdreacuced eouipnand was clean ❑ L 30 Rooni..m a0uip„ran,—•erne,as required ❑ •00 P""pry hazardous food we tornperature raWirements ❑ 24 Storage.haeidlim of awn eetupnrlVul mess dunrpetdrop.pr.pesoon.display.service.tra,la.Pdrt.bon. ❑ Ts siVI.aer onoee,sidn e.d.o rw.,r,eed DRESSING ROOMS ❑ •0. Faukces o manten product Irnprature ❑ 2e No re-use of'tape service ❑ 4o Rooms clean.tear.''podded.tecdn,es slash O (a Thennonteyn Provided and conspicuous WATER OTHER OPERATIONS ❑ 05 Potentially hazardous food properly marred ❑ 1 •27 WOW source.sale:hot•cold under pees ire ❑ •e1 Toxic Items Properly stored.labeled.used.n« ❑ *071 UftwmMed and PO*rft Y hazardous food rot reserved ❑ 42 Premises maintained,free of Mier,unneonwn ❑ 09 Food protectan ounrq sto.aga.preparation.display.service. SEWAGE cya"maeeermr"owlpl w Progeny sto, transportation ❑ •2e Sewepe and wastewater disposal personnel ❑ a carom at lotd(to)mnimized PLUMBING ❑ 43 Compyle separation from lmngl~ng ouar ❑ to to use.food(ice)dnpenuv uteraos property stored O 29 installed.mantair" ❑ " Cleri.soiled linen prooeny stored NNEL ❑ 1 •30 cmu-conn.Niort.beck rphona e.beck9dw I SAFETY ❑ •11 PUS&halwnhmtectionerestncted TOILET&HANDWASHING FACILITIES ❑ '45 F"a*Xbrio,iahers—prdp..rmwfficlern O -121 monde wained and clean.good hygienic pechces ❑ •31 Number,conversant accesit".dugneQ Itietseed O •49 Exiting M1rn—edeOWq,good repair ❑ 1-1310tionckrines,hairrel ints ❑ 32 Tank rooms enclesed,seNebsing doors.fixtures,good O •47 Bectncal wiring—adequate,goon repair E U i PM ENT& UTENSILS repair.cyan:hand"'ansr.sensory towwtseires liars• O •48 Gas appliance'—property installed.maimainec ❑ 14 Food(,")contact surfaces:d"Vned.constructed.halm "device'per 'proper weste reuptseles ❑ •49 Fymmablaicombugiby mrsnals—properly s tsxled.installed.located GARBAGE& REFUSE DISPOSAL GENERAL ❑ 15 f4ondodO contact surfaces:designed.constructed.man- ❑ 33 0ontowr0 s or nosptai:ys,cored:adegtw number. O so Curren hcenss--propMy displayed teased,installed.located i sewrodent Proof.frequency.clean ❑ St Otter toad tens—seivrly and esN operation ❑ ,s Disrwash,ng facilities:dsepned.constructed.maintained. ❑ 34 Outside storage arm enclosures prop"costrucMd,clean: ❑ nstaWd.located.operated comrohw incineration, 32 Fs inow"CIM 11folsollsoffi=lzutiftshod or ad, ❑ 17 A;7.;.r,. Nen.chemrwtatkits proviIw•9su9e INSECT RODENT ANIMAL CONTROL cook(',i-IPS Vafw) ❑ •36 Presence d irlfeCtshoderits-btrler 33 Food Management certification Valid ❑ 10 Pre hushed.scraped.aoakw birds.turtles usher anirnale o protected,no ;C� 34 ❑❑ w Wan.rase water clean,proper ympersture FLOORS WALLS&CEILINGS ❑ 36 AY1omatic Graludy N01iCe •20 SWa maton rinse:clmn.Wnprature,commntratron,expo ❑ 36 floors:constructed.drained.cyan.good repast.oownng ❑ 56 Copy d Ch.309 F.S.available sure nm.:egwpment,utensils sanitized d.std ertsxation.�yyacw—,p nee , INFORMATION ❑ T, Wong clothe:clean,use restricted.stared O 37 Wstb,coRmix eaycfrtl egWmrif:constructed.good repair, ❑ [ 37 HEP nlorrttstion Requested clean surfaces,dustless planing methdds :OMMENTS: M I /1/1- (�� Further Comment' NOTICE:OFF-MYOF RESTAURANT PROGRAMS.. .SEND COPY OF FORM TO H&R OFFICE ON NEW ACCOUNTS,CHANGES OF OWNERSHIP INCREASED SEATING CAPACITY OR SERVICES,AND ESTABLISHMENTS THAT HAVE CLOSED(OUT OF BUSINESS)TO THE PUBLIC. APPROVED . . . PRIOR TO OPENING,CONTACT ❑ NEW FACILITY ❑ CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS ❑ OUT OF BUSINESS TO OBTAIN LICENSE. BEVERAGE LICENSE Phone '¢70034& NO. TYPE: ldcnowledge• ipt of this inspection form and comments on the reverse side. ,gnA ice~ Served by Z` _.� 5..57- itie ( )C 4---o Office Date to 3R•22-015(Rev.4/91) LLUALIMU I RoM CONTROL NUMBER A of Department of Business Regulation Fiw NIR,per CAunty Division of Hotels and Restaurants 725 South Bronough Street H Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1012 PUBLIC LODGING INSPECTION RECORD owner EGtSA ,�rl'1 wA�IOAM� (-71 e�ait».a A41AM Street No S9 S� $.W, "� 1 S"�• City of on Nontrens.Mt Apartment Cl Hotel Motel ❑ Rooming House ❑ Trauslent Apartment ❑ nown Condornihiunn INSPECTION MO DAY YR INSPECTION IN OUT No.Banta)UnNe I 1 a I O Num1w GATE TIME (r? C O NuRtbslt VC ra- Failure to comply with the Notice will result in a Hearing to degrmine whether or not yaw ik~wim be suspended. revoked or an administrative fine Of up 10 01000 par trl0latiOn impOSed. WARNING WARNING OF DIRECT NOTICE NOTICE TO SHOW CAUSE v,ota,•ons-n 1�e operation Failure to be in compliance with this notice at any You Wo be laauad a Natroe to Show Cause why IoW estaphshment must tuiure Inspection may result in a direct Nuke to aM1aMOM should not be assessed against your corrected or Show Cause. license.A hw"will be hold at a time and place XT ROUTINE Oq O BV MO. OAY TR. b M f>ireClOr. ;�6E NSPECTION 11 EMS MARKED WITH AN ASTERISK I')ARE AREAS OF CRITICAL CONCERN IN THE OPERATION OF YOUR ESTABLISHMENT. VIOLATION ITEM DESCRIPTION VIOLATION ITEM pEtiCRMION O 1 Fue Estin urshers Ak O •24. Gwent License-Pr ❑ 2 Exits/obstructions O 26. OwsR O 3 Elevators O 26. Amin f o Schedule 40M 22404) S O 4 Electrical DNrcrencies � y O 27. ttoorn Isstes Posted Joan 12-0161 A O S i ne Nazarda O •26. False or tMfiNad AdveAiselrlant F ❑ 6 Public Lighting O 26. Other untanillaryiHmardous Conditions E T ❑ 7 Aoeouste Hosting O 30. 50.111- v O 6 Appliances Property Installed E O 31. Security t ❑ 9 Soiler/Boiler Room E O 32. Ch.W.032.F.S.•AdAhiethksl O •10 Proper Locking Devices q O 22. 506.261 6 a .F.S.-Criminal Conduct �13 11 Budding Repair/Painting - ` O 534. IC•3.001 0)F A.C.- sanitized O 12 T,olet'Lavat /Showerhead O 35. Clean hldoor Air Act O 13 Toitels,Sathrooms Designated O 36. 7C-3008 FA C.-Business Practices O IS Hot Cold Water Provided O •37. Smoke Detector S o 1 15 seadimg items D •38. Spninkleir SyslenwNiplicis of Extension A N O 16 Household Furnishings O 039. Helvinji Impaired T O ' "4o. sa • O 16 L. hl•n /Ventilation Cl 41, of Ch.".F.S.Available T O 19 Screening N O •42. balcony Certification I O O •20 Vermin Control F O 43. N O 21 Clean nness.'Druna e R O 044. Ice Protection O •22 Garbage and Refuse A O e 45. Telephone Burch Posted D -23 Sewerage or Disposal Systems T O 46. Pas"Operator Service Wormation 1 O 47. Black or Access O :OMMENTS N O 46. HEP Information 7�tsT.E pc acc. "3159 Further Comments on Back: §*n0wIWg9 receipt of this inspection form and comments on the reverse Ongd 4 n" Served by .5...�.•.� Ile Office Phon a- L Date ate LEGAL NOTICE Department of Business Regulation Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services' - -' Division of Hotels and Restaurants I State Health Office/Office of Restaurant Programs FOOD SERVICE INSPECTION REPORT OWNER /� BUSINESS CO. FILE NUMBER CV ADDRESS , I CITY ` � . F MO DAY Y Restaurant Number Caterer O MFDV OINSPECTION IN �" 0 Seats Vending O TPFC D DATE 1414 Sead O m PorO Failure to comply with the Notice will result in a Hearing to determine whether or not your license will be suspended, revoked or an administrative fine of up to$1000 per violation imposed. WARNING WARNING OF DIRECT NOTICE NOTICE TO SHOW CAUSE Violations in the operation ❑ Failure to be in compliance with this notice at any ❑ You will be issued a Notice to Show Cause why 0 our establishment must future inspection may result in a direct Notice to sanctions should not be assessed against your rracted b Show Cause. license.A hearing will be held at a time and place INWROUTINE: BY be designated by.the Director. PECTION OR O MO. DAY , YR. ITEMS MARKED WITH AN ASTERISK(')ARE AREAS OF CRITICAL CONCERN IN THE OPERATION OF YOUR ESTABLISHMENT. VIOLATION VIOLATION VIOLATION j FOOD FOOD EQUIPMENT&UTENSILS Cont. LIGHTING ❑ 1 01 1 source:sound condition.no spoilage ❑ 22 Food Contact isirfaoas of equipment and utensils clean.free 13 39 Lightlnq provided as required,fixtures shielded ❑ 02 Original coruvw.property to sled — of abteanes,detergents VENTILATION FOOD N 13 23 Non-food coraaa surfaces of equipnlent end utensie dean ` ❑ 1 39 radon.and.quionn.m-.vened all required ❑ •03 Potsnuaay hazaroous food meats temperature requirements ❑ 24 storage.handling of clean equipmentfuensils during storage.prepar,abn.display.service,transportation ❑ 25 single-ssrwoe articles.aorag•.tlispensing.wed DRESSING ROOMS ❑ •oat Factktes to maintain product temperature ❑ 1 we No rouse of angle service ❑ e0 Roans dean,Iockom ptovidw.fadt(tes clean.totaled ❑ 05 Thermometers provided ardconspicuous WATER OTHER OPERATIONS ❑ 06 faofentyny hazardous food property thawed ❑ •27 weer source,safe:hot l cold under pressure ❑ '41 Toxic to property stored,labeled.used.necessary ❑ •07 Unwrapped red potentell hazardous food not re-serve, SEWAGE ❑ a2 �rmieas nrintamd.free of uM.unneceuan.nabs ❑ lIF otl cleaning maintenance equipment property Gored.Auth protection during abrage.preparation,tlnpley aarnce. ❑ •26 sewage and waste water disposal ra0ortalrorn ❑ a3 CompMS separation from livngrasepng quarers.Lau oandkng of food(ice)minimized PLUMBING ❑ as Gaon.edited k,wn apo.ny pons, ❑ l use.food(ice)dispensing utensils property stored ❑ 20 i^��•malmai ed PERSONNEL ❑ •30 Cmu-C rmectmn,back slDhonfige.backnow I SAFETY ❑ •11 Personnel with infections restricted TOILET &HANDWASHING FACILITIES ❑ '45 Fire extinguish"'—proper and sufficient ❑ • a 12 HMft waited a"Clean.good hygienic practices 13 W •31 Nunr.cw;r';lent a=*UOle,O"red.instaped 1:1 •e6 Exrkng systern-adequate.good repair 13 13 Chan domes.halt restraints ❑ 32 Toilet rooms enclosed,sere-closing doom,fixtures,good ❑ •47 Electrical wining-adequate,good repair ;O0Q UIPMENT& U ENSILS repair.Clean:hand Cellumer•SOMary bWatattisaleihand- ❑ •46 Gas applianc ti-Wopeny installed.maintained ❑ 14 Food(ice)contact surfaces:deegne0.constructed.main­ drying daYKe♦prorded.proper wulol 'ptaces ❑ •49 Flammable/Combustible materials-property stored tared.installed.located GARBAGE& REFUSE DISPOSAL GENERAL ❑ 15 Non-food contact surfaces:deigned.constructed,mam- ❑ 33 Containers or receptacles.covets:adequate number. ❑ 5o Current tianse--properly displayed loved.IrgLlled.located kneact/rodent proof.frequency.clean ❑ 16 Dishwashing facllitea:designed.constructed,maintained, ❑ 34 Outside storage area enclosure ❑ St Other conditions,-unittry and Ye operation property canstnutted,dean: Installed.located.operated controlled incineration ❑ 52 Fatea/miseeding asemema—publishod or adMebsed ❑ 17 Accurate thermometere.chemical test kin provided.gauge INSECT RODENT ANIMAL CONTROL rwbng to f°°°mnwage cook(%"IPS valve) ❑ •35 Presence of i eects/rotlems-outer openings protected.no ❑ 53 Food managsrnem certification valid ❑ 16 Pre-flushed.scraped.soaked -birds.tunas,other ansnale ❑ 54 Clean Indoor Air Act ❑ 19 Wash.rinse water:clean.proper temperature ❑ W Automatic Gratuity Notice ❑ FLOORS WALLS 8t CEILINGS ❑ •20 s net ime:a nose:dean.temperature.concentration.expo- ❑ 56 Copy of Ch.SOB F.S.availeble ere time:equipment,utsnala unitized � Fbora:corWruaed,drained,eleen,good repair.covering installation.01°""'clearviv methods INFORMATION ❑ 21 Wiping cbtns:clean.use restricted,stored ❑ 37 Walls.sting,attached equipment:constructed.good repir. ❑ 1 57 HEP Information Requested clean surfac»s,dustless tuning methods :OMMENTS: Further Comments on E NOTICE:OFFICE OF R TAbRONTPROGRAMS. ..SEND COPY OF FORM TO H&R OFFICE ON NEW ACCOUNTS,CHANGES OF OWNERSHIP, INCREASED SEATING CAPACITY OR SERVICES,AND ESTABLISHMENTS THAT HAVE CLOSED(OUT OF BUSINESS)TO THE PUBLIC. PROVED !1— PRIOR TO OPENING,CONTACT ❑ NEW FACILITY ❑ CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP D I "-OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS ❑ OUT OF BUSINESS OBTAIN LICENSE. BEVERAGE LICENSE Phone NO, TYPE: 3cknowledge•receipt f thi inspection form and comments on the reverse side. 'g^� ` L Served by S, J Title ;tle Office Phone Date Da 3R-22-015(Rev.4/91) �,lk 0 � SAX FOLIO ADDRESS OZg ' /ego S n �� 9 y v i^ M oh Lam__ p oct o 2 S 1465 P rr,4 _. t 33 )q OLD - ,Igo C?2 Q /0/4, Za it li (i fr � 1 1010 b 2s w� �� s ci s�PL , q tLo Duo �97v i=rzfla�c�' G� `vioti u ear �_p GI�a ►" .TP r 0fe R Pe is c v F,�yo —2,000 Oct Sou 6 9 S O z a - Zo v 1`c F L l-J• (o C2:_ a/0 S c,-/ 69 �t- � �! Z°o a ,Q per Zo Se=cQ� �>P-NC�SuITU7 Jos : R'L °IYU L-1 (AM 0 JAX FOLIQ NAME ADDRESS 92 -/- 0070 o M c-=2 o rte► C A-- 02 — oolId ej (j 0D 3 oz� WOO A) 0 51-•e L 0'% L e— 02 7- o o C is w D 1 �,. S w /1 ►°l, 331 r- 027 -off 20 IL/kA n, 000- oSlo C-72F/I.-IC o� O l l - �! f✓fi H't L a 1'f I GG nJS b y ? S g n.j S 7- A N v s-r'q o P-0 I e0O-2-O %I &ISUAL- ' t"c Oil - o o Q Chi-. 6 2,o-�e&)b A-4 mlie PQ 4 v d 2� ci of - o b A ►� �r p(( - (.0((-0 ;L C-J Z 3 7s K - 308 O 01 2-0 ,M MA5o/V u r r.F A 0 0,,JlLd- e-' -� ( Sw _ Avg1 33252 CGK 2" rz/ FC- !J- 0 o d-4- t9S.svC- 6 o7J Aj / OU — o ( 7o -_ So in/ ©tJ rIV SLe 60516 ic% - o(l - o c 4t 7001 S 61 A-I f Y- D (( - 0Z'O'o , M ' m f__PPLo6g�iun / s0 Sc.J L5 5-1`V aly 3:5Q ( l 0 2 t o Z �✓ �`Z7�'Z S c� 7 D SI` 33/ Ryr a Lu7- 3 ► 30 o( ( - 02-co it it it /C 'c l ol 'e 011, 1 A/ 7� r 3 Dftae CowIT-f N, W, Sr Srz �T P(-A N t N(r- P>,RLG_7-o Lr M t k m l / AGIL T� =s Atri NJ HttA I r---orLiPA o�57 TAX FOLIO NAME ADDRESS 0;5-000I Rob Sw Sq 02s-cc1 o 00) 0 00 Cco CC)10 C 02-& 9030 � n w ly0 S'1 -- --------- ----------- —�• �� r FELIX CARPENITO TR DELORES ZUCCKERD WALTER A. MOBLEY 6845 SW 59 P1 11803 Hemlock St. P. O. Box 330451 SO. MIAMI, FL. 33143 Palm Beach Gardens, Fl . MIAMI, FL. 33133 33400 DOCTOR's HOSPITAL OF JEANETTE WASHBISH L. T. CAMPBELL S. MIAMI, LTD. 6900 SW 59 P1 . 6930 SW 59 Pl. 7031 SW 62 Ave. SO. MIAMI, FL. 33143 SO. MIAMI, FL. 33143 Miami, F1. 33143 FRANCISCO MONTANA MICHAEL SONTAG TR FRANCISCO MONTANA 5982 SW 69 ST. 6010 SW 69 St. 5961 SW 70 St. SO. MIAMI, FL. 33143 S. Miami, fl. 33143 SO. MIAMI, FL. 33143 F.M. JR. ENTERPRISES, INC. FRANK MONTANA, JR. FRANK MONTANA, JR. 5986 SW 69 St. 6011 SW 70 St. 6005 SW 70 St. SO, MIAMI, FL. 33143 S. Miami, Fl. 33143 S. MIAMI , FL. 33143 F.M. JR. ENTERPRISES, INC. FRANCISCO MONTANA CHAR-BETT, INC. 5990 SW 69 St. 5965 SW 70 St. 5907 SW 70 St. SO. MIAMI, FL. 33143 SO. MIAMI, FL. 33143 SO. MIAMI, FL. 33143 Jean Larkin SECISA INTERNATIONAL CAL B. ROSENBAUM 6110 SW 68 St. Attn. Mr. Julian P.O. Box 2000 SO. MIAMI, FL. 33143 5975 Sunset Dr. ,Ste. 108 SO. MIAMI, FL. 33143 S. Miami , F1. 33143 CAUSEWAY N.V,. ETHEL B. HIGGINS N.V. STORTFORD 2012 SW 124 P1 6075 Sunset Drive c/o Visual Production MIAMI, FL. 33175 SO. MIAMI, FL. 33143 5960 SW 71 St. S. Miami, F1. 33143 CAL B. ROSENBAUM TR S. MIAMI MASONIC LODGE 308 DONALD SHUEY P.O. Box 430082 P.O. Box 431491 15831 SW 97 Ave. 50. MIAMI, FL. 33143 SO. MIAMI, FL. 33143 MIAMI, F1. 33157 SECURITY FED. S & L MINTON TINSLEY MICHAEL CARRICARTE 6075 Sunset Dr. -6046 N . Waterway Dr 7001 SW 61 Ave. S. Miami, F1. 33143 MIAMI, FL. 33155 SO. MIAMI, FL. 33143 S. MIAMI PROFESSIONAL BLDG. Z. F. .,; INC. DAVID GOLD/ALAN 1150 SW 1st St. , Ste. 214 5952 SW 70 St. GOLDFARB MIAMI, FL. 331303 SO. MIAMI, FL. 33143 28 Flagler St.#1200 Miami, Fl. 33130 F.S.B.INTERAMERICAN BANK STORTFORD N.V. DADE COUNTY PLANNING c/o Edward Walterman 5975 Sunset Dr. DEPT. DIRECTOR. 5900 SW 73 St. , Ste. 105 SO. MIAMI, FL. 33143 111 N.W. 1st St. Miami, Fl. 33143 Miami, Fl. 33142 ROBERT ALAMEN ROBERT BERKOWITZ ROBERT SPIEGEL Facilities Maintenance 7000 SW 59 P1 . 7090 SW 59 Pl. 3311 N.W. 31 St. S. MIAMI, FL 33143 SO. MIAMI, FL. 33143 Miami, F1 . 33142 MAURICE ROSEN C/O REISMAN 1 SE 3 Ave. , Ste 2600 Miami, Fl . 33131 Plarnrziricg Board November 14 , 1989 City Commissioners' Chambers Tuesday, 7:30 PM PB-89-023 Applicant: Secisa International Request #1: Variance from Section 20-3 .5G of the. City of South Miami Land Development Code to allow an arcade within the required 15 foot front setback for the ground floor only. RESULT: MOTION TO APPROVE: 2-3 Request #2: Variance from Chapter 4, Art. I, Section 4-2 (a) (2) of the Code of Ordinances of the City of South Miami to allow the sale of . alcoholic beverages within 1,000 feet of other licensed establishments. RESULT: MOTION TO APPROVE: 2-3 Request #3: Variance from Chapter 4, Art. I,. Section 4-2 (a) (3) of the Code of Ordinances of the City of South Miami to allow the sale of alcoholic beverages within 1,000 feet of residential property. RESULT: MOTION TO APPROVE: 2-3 Request #4: Special Use Permit for an Eating Establishment in an MO District, as specified in Section 20-3. 3(E) of the City of South Miami Land Development Code. RESULT: MOTION TO APPROVE: 5-0 Request #5: Special Use Permit to reduce the number of required y off-street parking spaces by 50%, as specified in Section 20-4.4(I) of the City of South Miami Land Development Code. RESULT: MOTION TO DENY: 4-1 Location: 5959, 5961, & 5965 S.W. 71 Street; 5952 & 5956 S.W. 70 Street Legal: Lots 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 , Block 3 , of ROSSWOOD SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 13-62 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. 62� Secretary Chairperson City of South Miami PLANNING BOARD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING On Tuesday, November 14, 1989, at 7: 30 P.M. in the City Commission Chambers, The Planning Board of the City of South Miami will conduct a Public Hearing on the following matters. PB-89-023 Applicant: Secisa International Request #1: Variance from Section 20-3 .5G of the City of South Miami Land Development Code to allow an arcade within the required 15 foot front setback for the ground floor only. Request #2: Variance from Chapter 4, Art. I, Section 4-2 (a) (2) of the Code of Ordinances of the City of South Miami to allow the sale of alcoholic beverages within 1,000 feet of other licensed establishments. Request #3 : Variance from Chapter 4, Art. I, Section 4=2 (a) (3) of the Code of Ordinances of the City of South Miami to allow the sale of alcoholic beverages within 1,000 feet of residential property. Request #4: Special Use Permit for an Eating Establishment in -.an MO District, as specified in Section 20-3 .3(E) of the City of South Miami Land Development Code. Request #5: Special Use Permit to reduce the number of required Off-street parking spaces by 50%, as specified in Section 20-4.4(I) of the City of South Miami Land Development Code. Location: 5959, 5961, & 5965 S.W. 71 Street; 5952 & 5956 S.W. 70 Street Legal: _ Lots 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13, Block 3 , of ROSSWOOD SUBDIVISION, according to. the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 13-62 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. YOU ARE HEREBY ADVISED THAT IF ANY PERSON DESIRES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING OR HEARING, SUCH PERSON WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, AND FOR SUCH PURPOSE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PRO- , CEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. (F. S. 286.0105) - PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD IN THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS AT THE CITY HALLS 6130 SUNSET DRIVE, SOUTH MIAMI. FLORIDA$ AT THE TIME AND DATE STATED ABOVE. ALL INTERESTED PARTIES ARE URGED TO ATTEND. OBJECTIONS OR EXPRESSIONS OF APPROVAL MAY BE MADE IN PERSON AT THE HEARING OR FILED IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE HEARING. THE BOARD RESERVES THE - RIGHT TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COMMISSION WHATEVER THE BOARD CONSIDERS IN THE BEST INTEREST FOR THE AREA INVOLVED. THE BOARD'S RECOMMENDATION ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE CITY COMMISSION AT A FUTURE DATE. INTERESTED PARTIES REQUESTING INFORMATION ARE ASKED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE ZONING DIRECTOR BY CALLING 667-5691 OR BY WRITING. REFER TO HEARING NUMBER WHEN MAKING INQUIRY. PLANNING BOARD PSBIOO-7 BZ REV. 12-9-61 THIS IS A COURTESY NOTICE GARDENS N 't ?? VH bw rb o ♦ • T W(N /4f- Of + L /, „ 1 7RAC 3 h SW. 66 TERR v lj NARSHAL L C jRA T D S W. �7 SI' jRAC7 f s • uvivERS/TY 7RACt .0 _ W/LL/AAISON GARDENS NO :s as - SW. 6 PA.IQK. 6 r� ♦ v, NO GARDENS �VO ? ' ;N' TRACT , h sw 69 ' ' t / S h - . 7. ? 0 10 .. !` imp I 2 3 - — VE �, ►9 ,a 17 )z—- - I• s; .il. .•4,9� 1 � .�.` S W- .74th of SECMA INTTERN A�TM0 AI_ APPLICANT: OWNER: 401-DFAmM* &*1•D SNAPIRo a- N Sit_ MAP REFERENCE: Sq sq — Vcw s. W• li ST ecrT; compass 17 S9 S 2 " 5(i S.W • le STRlET Scale.��. �l'IOV.N,I!1 COMMENTS: YARIANCes + SPEe1 AcL VSE P�R�t tTdS Date. A .0;% 89 Drn."- -Chk. . . . . Cl TV OR 5OUTH AIAMI " PLANNING 1504 P D Hearing Nofb. .m 43 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE PLANNING BOARD (FILE IN DUPLICATE) THIS APPLICATION MUST BE COMPLETED AND RETURNED, WITH ALL REQUIRED SUPPORTING DATA TO THE OFFICE OF THE ZONING DIRECTOR BEFORE PROCEEDINGS MAY BE STARTED FOR PUBLIC HEARING. APPLICANT AS (OWNER,, TENANT, AGENT, ETC. SPECIFY) ADDRESS OF APPLICANT CITY STATE ZIP PHONE OWNER DATE OWNERSHIP OF PROPERTY OBTAINED ADDRESS OF OWNER CITY STATE ZIP PHONE IS PROPOPTION OR CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE? MORTGAGEE IS NAME AND ADDRESS ! YES NO IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER/ IS LETTER OF AUTHORITY FROM OWNER ATTACHED? YES NO LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY COVERED BY APPLICATION LOT(S) 01 cl , co, II « ANO 11 1 ,,; " 11 f � . BLOCK SUBDIVISION w%Y/ Yvcoo PB METES AND BOUNDS SIZE OF AREA COVERED BY APPLICATION NAMES AND OFFICIAL WIDTHSF BUTTING R/WIS ADDITIONAL DEDICATIONS PROPOSED STRUCTURES LOCATED ON PROP RTY APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING BOARD FOR ACTION ON THE FOLLOWING: CHANGE OF ZONING EXCEPTION OTHER (SPECIFY) VARIANCE AMEND SECTION OF CODE �� ' �✓ °_ PRE:AENT ZONE CLASSIFICATION CHANGE OF ZONING REQUESTED EXPLANATION OF ABOVE (190 buy- Olt-pt r :► °,� L[0002 UCH/5F I J CW �W W5(06q)-Dpi, PVA�A-I . �FkG bkL 05 F- -ro KZ0 OCE Fax f 11 4 J-0 1504 r--cmajbp e-m u �ecbu-s-E (ov ek r(TI 'To nrl m X41 L, 3w 1 p k THE FOLLOWING SUPPORTING DATA REQUIRED IS SUBMITTED WITH THIS APPLICATION. (ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE PART OF APPLICATION. ) vCERTIFIED SURVEY _ /SITE PLAN PHOTOGRAPHS TSTATENIENT OF REASONS OR CONDITIONS JUSTIFYING CHANGE REQUESTED PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN HEARING FEE (CASH OR CHECK) OTHER THE UNDERSIGNED HAS READ THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION AND REPRESENTS THE INFORMATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DATA FURNISHED IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. SIGNATURE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY DATE OF HEARING HEARING NO. PSOIOO-21 REV. s-IZ-" DATE FILED S TAF F REPORT PB-89-023 November 6, 1989 Applicant: Secisa , International Request #1: Variance from Section 20-3 .5G of the City of South Miami Land Development Code to allow an arcade within the required 15 foot front setback for the ground floor only. Request #2 : Variance from Chapter 4, Art. I, Section 4-2 (a) (2) of the Code of Ordinances of the City of South Miami to allow the sale of alcoholic beverages within 1,000 feet of other licensed establishments. Request #3 : Variance from Chapter 4, Art. I, Section 4-2 (a) (3) of the Code of Ordinances of the City of South Miami to allow the sale of alcoholic beverages within 1 ,000 feet of residential property. Request #4: Special Use Permit for an Eating Establishment in an MO District, as specified in Section 20=3 . 3(E) of the City of South Miami Land Development Code. Request #5: Special Use Permit to reduce the number of required off-street parking spaces by 50%, as specified in Section 20-4 .4(I) of the City of South Miami Land Development Code. Location: 5959, 5961 , & 5965 S.W. 71 Street; 5952 & 5956 S.W. 70 Street Legal: Lots 8, 9, 10, 1.1, 12 and 13, Block 3, of ROSSWOOD SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 13-62 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. BACKGROUND: (Excerpted from various correspondence and minutes on file with the Department and City Clerk) September 10, 1957 Advisory Zoning and Planning Board Request: Application of Doris E. Smith to rezone Lot 11, Block 3 , Rosswood Subdivision (5959 S.W. 71 Street) from R-4 to C-2 . Response: Unanimously DENIED as spot zoning. October , 1957 City Council Resolution 1115 Request: A RESOLUTION ACTING UPON APPLICATION OF DORIS E. SMITH TO REZONE LOT 11, BLOCK 3 , ROSSWOOD, SUBDIVISION, FROM R-4 TO C-2. Response: Recommendation of Advisory Zoning Board accepted and the application is DENIED. PB-89-023 Page #2 April 13 , 1965 Advisory Planning and Zoning Board Request: Variance to remodel an existing apartment building to an architectural office in a C-1 district; Variance on existing setbacks where required side setbacks are 5 feet on inside property line or the property line itself if an unpierced fire wall is provided and a required rear setback of 15 feet; existing setbacks are 2 feet on each side and 5 feet in rear on Lot 10, Block 3 , ROSSWOOD, PB 13-62. Response: APPROVED. April 19, 1965 City Council Resolution 2052 Request: RESOLUTION OF CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, GRANTING VARIANCE PERMITTING REMODELING OF NON CONFORMING BUILDING ON LOT 10, BLOCK 3, ROSSWOOD, PB 13/62; SAID REMODELING BEING FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES. (With the povision that: the variance hereby granted shall not be construed so as to permit the enlargement of the existing structure in violation of any setback requirements, nor shall it be construed .so as to permit any future buildings on said site in violation of setback requirements. Response: APPROVED. June 8, 1976 Planning Board Request: Approval of Special Use to permit building to be used as a restaurant on Lots 8, 9, 10, Block 3 , ROSSWOOD SUBDIVISION, PB 13-62 Response: APPROVED contingent upon meeting all requirements. July 20, 1976 City Council Resolution 90-76-3459 Request: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, GRANTING A SPECIAL USE IN A C-2 ZONE (DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL) TO PERMIT THE OPERATION OF A RESTAURANT WITH REGARD TO CERTAIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5952 SOUTHWEST 70TH STREET, SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA. Response: Unanimously APPROVED. i ANALYSIS The nature of this project is consistent with the spirit of the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment of this area; the project would be a valuable addition to the City of South Miami, would create jobs, help promote economic development and could spur redevelopment of the surrounding properties. SECISA SECISA INTERNATIONAL UDA. INC. October 26, 1989 City of South Miami Planning Department 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami ,Fl . 33143 RE : Letter of intent indicating hardship for variance Dear Sirs : 1 . We ask the city to permit us to build into our front setback area ,with a columned arcade . The code permits us to cantilever over the setback area to the property line.The problem is that then we will be forced to cantilever three stories with hotel rooms increasing our cost dramatically. This requirement will force us to completely re-design our hotel ,at this time we are ready to proceed with our final drawings . Our firm believes that a covered arcade is a positive amenity for the city,one which is encouraged through out other cities, in their present codes . 2 . We ask the city to permit us to obtain a liquor license even though we are less then one thousand feet to an apartment complex. 3 . We ask the city to grant us a special use permit , reducing our parking requirement by fifty percent, because--of- aui7-i-k5roximity to metro rail . V , 5975 S.W. Sunset Dr. Suite 108, Miami, Fla. 33143 (305) 662-2232, 662-1144, TELEX: 266008 City of Soum Miami 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida 33143 667-5691 May 16, 1990 To Whom It May Concern: Please, be informed that Giovanni Is Restaurant previously existing at 5952 S.W. 70 Street was licensed to operate with seating for 170 persons. Copies of this license are on file with the Department of Building & Zoning. Sincerely, Sonia Lama, AIA Director B & Z "City of Pleasant Living" SEC'SA -,gip ► SECISA INTERNATIONAL U13A. INC. Ov- I um bv-e l� 2 411 �� � 30 3 1211 251 30 -f �A urn .1n, 30 If '301 (40 , - -75)6 s 30 '' 3 ) 351 30 351 .301 2 x 962, 11 -2 u m 2.q 11 �j + 3o 1 BQo�cl� Cat i, V(L Z If 1, 301 �o 1 2-,,< 1. U,rn,b c, 401 Sol 301 +z 13 "a) k Pit 30 if ZO 1 � 01 13 A-�no C\a 'R(,- I I (�o 1 601 G qb-,(\a C jo- 2011 �f�S 1 35 r it Za 11 Cjo GS ) off 35 1 301 1 x 7C)Gd R5) k mo r\c� � 2 -T 00 i RG Noi- U'AtN M , Z ,f Z5 1 qCD 1 2 x 1 . 2 aro,(1/ [� &)jJf-pe gvjAak I t 1 8 1 10 1 RCUR060 3011 5975 S.W. Sunset Dr. Suite 108, Miami, Fla. 33143 (305) 662-2232, 662-1144. TELEX: 266008 I z tt 30 f t y 4 wC oo.f 5 3 'f q i �l3 # as' 4'411! 4 a y i;. � - t :.� I i - Y b -.? f ..1. 1 J L ''` Yom' ,•'-f. -P, r v * � { � .x r*r t A V. F tx'F r 'x' s M; - - e 4 �` ar -' >} sew h 'k - ,nr 1 .,7 _[ r y. 4 Z ,�p� t 1°� ;'C ry 4 v° 7 C ` i F p, .- Y � a*. j .. y. 4 *. }�. . k if y -f� } r ..y n .r,Y 7F.� 'y�' .�, , 7 tr,V a 'c,:i t 3 .. -ter y~ - t. `-.t '# x.�. IBS .`� .si � ? .,. c*t y ! h L - A y .:.1 "� 11 I r s:, .t S :; ,r.-Yrr 'k" ,`- 1 �' �,{a 1`r U .. + » ', L s t �r 3 `c 'ra<t ;� :.. .t a L rt,n t >' 7 ' n in r Y 3s�i ....r -. ;rr a �"i?. 'r" a r °'� 's �'l F '= - p. q n a ,f'. s,ti _'� :-' t .J r � ," i` j I " I ' ' wI r. . a ., -� a -R�a ij ice ' %r� t'ir: `} '< . " '' n- : 4 emu..e b4 Pty _ a L. , - •`�' ' -. 7 - .r '; SYt 4 �. y ,!e " , ' ,,N. -1.7 fk, •K._ •.;r _ I- `..-.J ."�t�' , -, Iw 'r. '� `' .. r �: "Mr'.5'"°"..r„ �I ' , , 7 ' '4 —at ®. �,",, , " w"�" - r q;�b l� ° y yk.Y,n ':yl q $t y Ff,, K r 'W ' 1 f 'T k: 3 r J• y } .F:?_ } .,t y is-,:✓.k t, t_ f '� ,k F yy V 'Z".C4"t!''7""t y',�+a-r '4-. 'iG'i�'r'^�.rr...,..i.'•..a. .Y r,-ah �l'vc�..w .r^• a 1* �� db a q t �j _'f• --it+. t n 4. .yam. y t ,^- a t+j i L y^ t-_ .� - t; ,� 29 "y S .`Y' � �,s K r �- �I o �4 ��. v 2� LLB, a r.,m t - t 4 n y�r_ s a , C a_;;.9 ... f7+ i.C<y _%rt r.,...,�}7 7 _ -` r ^r.r;- � ..Qa y G#; * w „3 '-` 11 i 'I i . f' - _ � ` tI 1 , - � ... i �' 1 fit' - � a - :- ..{ IZ�: ,.*E .q,r t. ?.� 7�. x,2J , fi L: 1T5, s., : C ( 4 M1� 7 .'I+ i + ,Y.rE� C �"1 T k � `-', �i _ j 7 kk S ���,� f. ` #{f+- S`5 ' t Cif-' r ?. 'AJ - { rte„H Y' Z t 1 y 'e Fr. d it �i4. i f : 1� .F _, A � .. I I I . _' -I�J ' . .. .fi 4, jx ; ' i i �� ; r -F� jf. t 7 �- t I I r u ' ,a . n� r .. { 2 `T !rte 7 _ ^ Y laS I.- " [ 7 c f- r'N. 1. I� ' . '�� ,! _1 d , L - ," 'I*l.� ; , ".'� , - ,, Y � �' - ",' , I , , ;.'�- , :�" 4 1f y FY S �': 1 TI �. y x x t rs a`Y } yJ: Sy t1� t ,'+"iI"y C?':.S J v y y.Il-fij' �_ ' 1 , s 3.K e, ' w k _t` _ * ..k .• - 1 i 4 '.., , s r° ' - ;�. ,_ .. a,p.,?:w syt.•- - .1. r'•e 'i' i. x-r a-_air;1'- ",'. ,: - -:4 '" :%- :�--',.G:-;a.,�__ S-^�•mfal.—. a-x�;r:7a2y{ti a 's`. ^'.' *;a_A R"...:��3:rJ 11 , 3a Yr. .5. .- , hi '..,E� . c: "max- a,. The following is a list of accessory uses that are permitted by special use permit in both the LO and MO Districts. Book or Stationery Store Camera or Photo Supply Store Confectionery or Ice Cream Parlor Drinking Place Drug, Pharmacy or Sundry Store Dry Cleaning Substation (no processing) Eating Place (accessory) Film Processing Substation Florist Gift, Novelty or Souvenir Store Hobby, Toy or Game Shop Jewelry Store Newsstand Office Supplies Photographic Studio Physical Fitness Facility Tobacco Shop ZONING REVIEW SHEET Date Project ���l )Yf Address Owner Telephone Designer Telephone District Lot of Record Use permitted: No Special-Use: ' No Accessory Use: 2�59 No Existing Nonconforming Use: Yes No Allowed/Required Proposed Sign Lot Area Type Proposed Lot Frontage Front Setback Side Setback ✓ Allowed: Yes No Side Corner Size Rear Setback Allowed: Yes No FAR Building Height Materials Submitted Lot Coverage Density . Land Coverage Landscaping N TI Parking Total Standard Compact Handicap Comments: y. Reviewed by ._ r i•.i tr tl Tf .. r -:J .. . OCT fN "89 15. 1 1 f PS46/G1OVANN116 LAW <�Fd'iCC.S C%F YAc.r,T CRVx wAY •$N7Q t3CY0 AdiAHY ��I.VM. .E°$.�"sRtt�}nt�tmY MV45CMr 1g, drt A0i40 ?Kt KF;AY D. WC16, JA.. i3Qy.1 bY04"Er-.8CR V 01A 30#.Cmvly T3 eAa 1,. GCC#RCt; S MCiFB rtct ber �6 r 1989 TO TH2 CITY OP SOUTH MMTp FLORIDA& P Re: %GioVanni ' S Ragt&Vra,nt. i, Dear sirs: As Court appointed Receiver of Z.F. , Inc . is to authorize SECISAt INC. , purchaser ander Contrast , to apply fnr slach variances as it deems necessary for the 'property known as 5952 $,W. I 70th Streat, South MiaMi p Florida, lagally' described as -, Lets a, 9 and 10f Slock 3, ®f ROSSWC:OD, according to the Plat the:-eof , ag rAn6rded in PIat Book 1-3 at Page 62 of �.;he Vlab .i,c Records of Dade County, �. Florida. � 4 HE-SERI 9 a SF ?1R:; as Receiver of Z .F. , INC. : �j�.04 £.. LAW OFFICES GOLDFARB & GOLD, P.A. 39TH FLOOR ONE CENTRUST FINANCIAL CENTER 100 SOUTHEAST 2ND STREET ALAN GOLDFARB MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 TELEPHONE(305)371-3111 DAVID H. GOLD FAX(305) 577-8375 JOEL S. MAGOLNICK October 26 , 1989 City of South Miami Planning &Zoning South Miami, Florida Re: Lots 11, 12 and 13, in Block 3, of ROSSWOOD SUBDIVISION, .according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 13, Page 62, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida a/l/a 5959, 5961 and 5965 S.W. 71st Street, Miami, FL Gentlemen: We authorize Secisa International to proceed with whatever variances they would . need for their proposed project in connection with the above property. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, Alan Goldfarb AG:kj �YN51Y'A16Ltlty�Y�"`+iho'Na!•Mn.a ewua n.r.. 1388 SOUTH FLORIDA BUILDING CODE -------_— 5-'PB prism=, --"—'--- rn accessible route shall comply with the appr'opr'iate requirements of this Si:clion and the drawings in Appendix 1). (3) Wheelstops and other similar traffic control devices shall pro- vide a nrinirrrum 36 inches clear passage on either side. (4) %Valks used to provide access to and from parking areas,on pri- ti•ately-owned property, shall confornr to fire requirements Of.Pa 515.3 (Ir) hcrc�in. (5) Ramps or curb-crrts from roadways or parking a way level• r xits I privately-owned property, shall be provided at or near the main 6�r e.rs to the walk- c:nlranees or exits io buildings used by the general public. Such-ramps or curb- t-he following:ing: r'nr tc> the reduircrrrerTts Of1'araagr•aph 515.3(d) herein and with the. fO11t.r�ying: (aa) walk acr Rarnps 0r curb-cuts shall not be located where pedestrians nrrrsl oss the ramp or curb-cut to use the wr y the ramp or curb-cul are. flared in accordance with valkwarlunless the sides of herein, p' graph 515.3(d)(10) (bb) lr Ira s c. curb-arts shall be so located that they do not project into vehicular traffic. their ohstrrr (cc) R-"Ilrps or ct.Irb-cuts shall be located or•protected to prevent ction by parkod vehicles. (d) REQUIRED NUMBER: quired (1) No building having 5 or fewer total parking spaces shall be re- to provide larking spaces for the physically handicapped or disabled. (r l Buildings of Groups A,13 and C Occupancy; Group 1�, Div"S parking g.rr<rge ; coup Il Occupanc'y hotels. nrvlels and similar uses; and Group J, si�isic>rr 3 Occupancy stadiums and similar uses shall be provided wr(b accessible parkin$spaces()'*'he type specified by this Section and o such ntan'rbcr as specified by sl)t le 5-c'. TABLE 5-C PARKING SPACES FOR THE PHYSICALLY DISABLED AND/OR HANDICAPPED Assembly, Business, Mercantile and Other Non-Residential Uses E Total Spaces in Parking Lot Required Number of Reserved Spaces 6to25 ....•.•_ 26 to 50 ....... 1 .... ....... 51 10_75 ... 2 C1 tto 100.................... 3 ........... ....... 4� 101 to 150.... `--.. — ........ - ----- - ........... 151 to 200 —— 5--- 201 to 300,.,_.. 301 to 400 7 ........ ...................... 401 to `i00....... 501 to 1000....... ...................... 9 over 1000....... 2% of total 20 Pius one for each 100 over 1000 ` f3l A]] other occupancies, except as provided herein, shall be pro- 'file'] with accessible perking spaces ofthe type specified by this Subsection ari{7:iYr such numt>er as is specified by Table 5-:1) EXCEPTION: Group 11 Occupancy residential buildings ma hall'Of the nutrrber of accessible parking spaces Specified by Table 5-1), g� y provide one- hOWever,parking areas of such buildings provvidin.r park- ing Spaces shall provide at least One accessible parking space of the type g nacre than 5 total speci'fieci by this Subsection. rk City of South Miami % y PLANNING BOARD p. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING On Tuesday, November 14, 1989, at 7: 30 P.M. in the City Commission Chambers, The Planning Board of the City of South Miami will conduct a Public Hearing on the following matters. PB-89-023 Applicant: Secisa International Request #1: Variance from Section 20-3.5G of the City of South Miami Land Development Code to allow an arcade within the required 15 foot front setback for the ground floor only. Request #2: Variance from Chapter 4, Art. I, Section 4-2 (a) (2) of the Code of Ordinances of the City of South Miami to allow the sale of alcoholic beverages within 1,000 feet of other licensed establishments. Request #3.: Variance from Chapter 4, Art. I, Section .4-2 (a) (3) of the Code of Ordinances of the City of South Miami to allow the sale of alcoholic beverages within 1,000 feet of residential property. Request #4: Special Use Permit for an Eating Establishment in ,.an MO District, as specified in Section 20-3.3(E) of the City of South Miami Land Development Code. Request #5: Special Use Permit to reduce the number of required off-street parking spaces by 50%, as specified in Section 20-4.4(I) of the City of South Miami Land Development Code. Location: 5959, 5961, & 5965 S.W. 71 Street; 5952 & 5956 S.W. 70 Street Legal: _ Lots 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13, Block 3, of ROSSWOOD SUBDIVISION, according to, the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 13-62 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. ` THE CITY O F of t4 �ia M 6130 SUNSET DRIVE, SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 33143 PUBLIC SERVICE DEPARTMENT Z O N I N G P E T I T I O N Property Description, Location and Legal: Request : The Owners of the above property have made the following request: Petition: We, the undersigned property owners, are within 300 feet of the above property. We understand and approve the above request . NAME DATE ADDRESS I_ _ W v_ silnlS�T STbVarJ FLA7h 91)\f 7 C31 - -�`� �S SJijS�_ DC_ Qd-)A �IbtA( - - 2, r� ; _��fi�li�t.�.•,�-� cam.- - -)LW 7l - -6.ms 5v S7^-- - - - - - - 3 _S�1v� S ?K_ Nov • ' _ �rlv�� �.�$��_+ .�_ Prt� t1�1_ St - - - - - - - J-. ,�S°j 'jpc�o�'?b?n _C 62_Ave.�4D.ml wt;� - - - - - - - _C'�A�t� �LP _i 1 9_ �gsYA 14-_ s _7/ to. T14 Aki-it ��e �5914- ,-5W -f,- - - - - - - - - - - - ✓- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - [ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IW50-37 (continued on page 2) Page 1 w , *� r } Z O N I N G P E T I T I O N (continued) Petition: We, the undersigned property owners, are within 300 feet of the above property. We understand and approve the above request . NAME ADDRESS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PW50-37 Pace 2 GARDENS NO 4 '° "' Al ina sw 4.6 TRAC)'G, rk!G') _�. o ; ° �•S •14E OF � '1 , �+ a .., I ' 7RAC 3 h SW. 66 TERR , v MARSHALL C- TRAc;7' D 'S.W. �j Sr rRAC7 F UNI rERSI rY 7RA G.r :c• b W/LL/AMSON : GARDENS : NO ;. 41 •, , a ss. o PARK., � � 6 ►b .1 I/V%VERS/TYr GARDENS NO s TR/I C r .�:. vi z Sr ivs .9• ..,.z `y` i1 %2 'I/`•p • ! • `lo ..�r. 0 Jv, , y4' i' Ol:r� tt ►' sjF' a: �• K. /� - H 9. n • �A a;� • vO - S t 4 h> .pt , o° 3 ,9) ' s 1 i9 S4 3., y� LI ,� ► . i� "ra 3 . r NJ 1S fit: ,�ti _iG •a� ••y •` .•.9 sW = _74th SEC MA INTEizN AS TM(4 Ai. APPLICANT OWNER: &,b LDF'AIc�4 &o o-p j SH AP,(zo + � EI L_ MAP REFERENCE: SCI S41 — (e co S• w. li S'YIZEETL Compass s9 5 Z - SL S w • `10 STrttET AA SND COMMENTS: Scale .f.,�. W. YARRI ANCES + SPer-I Pr1.. USE ?ERM lT 4S Date . A Drn . 1. .Chk. . . . . CITY of SOUTH AIAMI oo PLANNING BOARD Hearing NO M 43 M IAMI�DADE WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY DEPARTMENT r < " R. O. BOX 330316 Main Office MIAMI, FLORIDA 33233-0316 3575 S. LeJeune Road Telephone 665.7471 March 30 , 1990 Elias Barreto Secisa International 5975 Sunset Drive, # 108 Miami, Florida 33143 Re: Water and Sewer Service to Dear Mr. Barreto: This is in response to your letter received in this office on March 29 , 1990 , regarding water and sewer service to the referenced project for the proposed construction of a one hundred eighteen (.118) room hotel. Water service may be obtained by means of a twelve (12) inch water main extension in S.W. 70 Street. Information concerning the estimated cost of facilities must . be .obtained from a consulting engineer. All costs. of engineering and construction will be the responsibility of the property owner. In addition, the Department' s standard water and sewer connection charges will be required. Easements must be provided covering any on-site facilities which will be owned and operated by the Department. At the present time, we have available water .system capacity for the referenced project. However, the availability of sewer service has not been determined. This information will be available in approximately three (3) weeks. Consequently, this letter is for informational purposes only and is not intended as a commitment for service. When development plans for subject property are finalized, and upon the owner' s request, we will be pleased to prepare an agreement for water and sewer services, provided the Department is able to offer those services at the time of the owner' s request. The agreement will detail Page No. 2 requirements for off-site and on-site facilities, points of connection, connection charges, capacity reservation and all other terms and conditions necessary for service in accordance with the Department' s Rules and Regulations. If we can be of further assistance in this matter, please contact us. Very truly your, 1 A A Tomas R. Goi ria Utilities D elopment . New Business Manager TRG/ch cc: Du_lce Rodriguez Rick Herrera v q ®'®:® bellon group/architects .- O-. I M[39�I� 11020 north kendatl drive I suite 200 I miami, fl�33176 d® phone (305) 596-9696 fax (305) 596-9000 r I i April 2 , 1990 k Mr. Bill Hampton City of South Miami Building Department South Miami , FL Dear Mr. Hampton: This is to certify that the proposed 'Miami Vila Hotel ' Drainage System has been designed to contain all rainwater within the site . Rainwater overflow should not run into any public right of way or adjacent properties. Sincerely, lion Group/ chitects� Inc. Le Bellon, AIA P ncipal cc: Leo Guedes , BGA Gv Files f% y m architecture ® land planning ■ interiors ® construction management MIAMI•DADE WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY DEPARTMENT 1llorir�.' P. O. BOX 330316 Main Office r. x MIAMI, FLORIDA 33233.0316 3575 S. LeJeune Road Telephone 665-7471 March 30 , 1990 Elias Barreto Secisa International 5975 Sunset Drive, # 108 Miami, Florida 33143 Re: Water and Sewer Service to 5952 S.W. 70th Street. Dear Mr. Barreto: This is in response to your letter received in this office on March 29 , 1990 , regarding water and sewer service to the referenced project for the proposed construction of a one hundred eighteen (118) room hotel. Water service may be obtained by means of a twelve (12) inch water main extension in S.W. 70 Street. Information concerning the estimated cost of facilities must be obtained from a consulting engineer. All costs of engineering and construction will be the responsibility of the property owner. In addition, the Department' s standard water and sewer connection charges will be required. Easements must be provided covering any on-site facilities which will be owned and operated by the Department. At the present time, we have available water system capacity for the referenced project. However, the availability of sewer service has not been determined. This information will be available in approximately three (3) weeks. Consequently, this letter is for informational purposes only and is not intended as a commitment' for service. When development plans for subject property are finalized, and upon the owner' s request, we will be pleased to prepare an agreement for water and sewer services, provided the Department is able to offer those services at the time of the owner' s request. The agreement will detail Page No. 2 requirements for off-site and on-site facilities, points of connection, connection charges, capacity reservation and all other terms and conditions necessary for service in accordance with the Department' s Rules and Regulations. If we can be of further assistance in this matter, please contact us. Very truly your , Tomas R. Goic aria Utilities D elopment New Business Manager TRG/ch cc: Dulce Rodriguez_ Rick Herrera MILES MOSS OSS & INC. Consulting Engineers 12900 S.W. 84 Street Miami, A. 33183 (305) 386-1212 April 2, 1990 William Hampton, City Manager City of South Miami, Florida 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, Florida 33143 . Re: Miami Ville Hotel MMA #490 Dear Mr. Hampton: Pursuant to Dade County Ordinance 89-66 and Florida Statute 163.3202 regarding the -- "Service Concurrency Management Program", Miles Moss and Associates, Inc. has studied the above-specified development regarding its impact on area traffic volumes. Our report of this study is attached for your review. Please do not hesitate to contact us if any questions, arise. Very truly yours, MILES MOSS & ASSOCIATES, INC. I�filea E. Moss, P.E. President MEMJlm cc: Sonia Lamb, Director Building & Zoning Departement City of South Miami Expert Witness Services • Traffic Engineering Studies I MIAMI VILLA HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY j. HMA #490 MILES MOSS & ASSOCIATES,. INC. 12900 S.W. 84 ST. I MIAMI, FLORIDA 33183 APRIL, 1990 Li i .. CONTENTS i 1 .0 BACKGROUND. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. 2.0 STUDY AREA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 E i. 3 AREA ..MAP, FIGURE 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NEIGHBORHOOD MAP, FIGURE 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 NEIGHBORHOOD AERIAL PHOTO, FIGURE 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 5 3.0 DEVELOPMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -. . . . . . . b 4.0 ANALYSIS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 5.0 CONCLUSIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 4 APPENDIX 4 (A) DADE COUNTY ORDINANCE 89-66 (B) FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC COUNT (C) ITE TRIP GENERATION RATES i l E- ffr t_s 1 J 1 .0 BACKGROUND This study is presented to satisfy the requirements of Dade i County Ordinance 89-66 and Florida Statute 163..3202, regarding the "Service Concurrency Review" . Specifically, this study addresses the impact which the proposed development is projected to have on nearby traffic. Existing and projected transportation facilities, roadway capacities, traffic volumes, traffic circulation patterns, and traffic control devices have been reviewed for this report. Methodology used for this examination is based upon is guidelines presented by the Dade County Public Works C .. Department. Appendix A includes a copy of Dade County Ordinance 89-66. f 71 i:.i 2.0 STUDY AREA The subject of this investigation is a site at 5952 S.W. 70 St. , which lies within the City of South Miami, Florida. This site is located between Southwest 70 St. and Southwest . 71 St. , immediately west of the South Miami Metrorail Station. This neighborhood is a residential and commercial office mixed area. Southwest 70 and 71 streets are two-way, .two-lane, undivided roadways. The nearest arterial roadway to the site which may be affected by increased traffic is Southwest 72 St. (Sunset Drive) . Figure 1 illustrates the South Dade County area and 1.: highlights the study area. Figure 2 presents a view of the study area neighborhood, highlighting the subject site, and Figure _ 3 is an aerial photograph of the study area neighborhood to the same scale as Figure 2. F-I r:> W. �.E�l91iilv119 —1 MKOI Eta ME tII� �a � •�I�(�`.��i t© ��t�.l5t>!L�It�i /St�i/ ®® Sl�h7�IRii�31�33 saris ®.. fS1'���` "� Mam- fi���el.-"�Isms: -��., e!s�r,►.o©ts�s��1 �5y®' '-3t'1 Y,'�[� sue. �rrs�:rasi,. -�+� �rr�e�c�'�et ' a !""F MUM PSi �FnT C ma j i 1 mime" V� eti�a , spa==i t WGUR o MUIR Eli 1�1t_ C. TKMI Iliv \ � � " 'Y 'fir?•��°"�f i' ' 'y'. Fi ''ci.'-•11 �''7'�. A_��i�..ent- _f'ELI__ ART �.•,'?' ���� ��- i' gip' r —911as no � '� i_4���� y � ■ f���� �. 0 �ia�$�'�"��3' FC E ^'' "���► tv4.'.t'nww yEaww!�. _ s<•.,. i��4""�'ci:•. �rril:fL'-=a3 � 17715 ' , ® � �tE •�� �� aiw J�` .1p 1 �.."; FIGURE 2 NEIGHBORHOOD MAP H SO J Y `JTO•Mh•00/ {}iT� ti YAREEN GROW 0,Kf/, ADC CO- /F TJ /0 J .di 7. O. M/AM a / • J 4 / D• s• //•$S S0 s• !f S° fo is d• , �SrY oI� TEAR. Q Q ,g EO f `1 J7 Ic r b n 1� ►� / to q q ? � U ,Y V a ? �* n �• �' Y1 pp a; g -/r-� 0 0 . Ji dR mo fe ,o ,e c 0 u a fo K • .4 �• -•. - .. .. UNN / PAR _ . d Q .W.GG"'TFFR. u y Tt /• 9 ff rs Q re u ti ip g c 5 e� .// 3•W. 67— •RlDeT0R14 f j e 4� AC• ri7/l c 7 r R TRAC T O r pf. %' rACT f tl,p 14�h 2 Tft A c T•E• n TRAC C 7 y l 30 tiN o ....YCa 1171/.AA. a �- uor•/f! 3339 A to 1... e TRwcT 'A' T/J Oc7' Is s< 6P ! °Q W 1,4 GARO'GNJ JV9 w/G 2 V✓ +.I • '�' !f o At: i".• 5. ? $ 6 9 s T. � r7 r9-• ( 4-13 4• U6 LO v ! y X60• / e Q e oo�• f -so i >6 J5 a y /f 4. -.ROSSwoOOtr!-G OtK6 L1♦�.. S 15 Js .r de 3 i Lb ' �. 20 v • u° 5.W 7/" Sr. rRAcr '3' S o liz wet �..• S1w. f,!/fry yN TRAC 7 �,�1) kj p � :4' t •�a � �i 9 � �i C L X/N cEARr6e COMAWNCRAL LANK/•/s+' : •AWAIACD PR4T OP Co"mrOC/AL BOUrR/A9/AM/ L I (27-671 GL K3 /6 2 (76.11/LOrs4ff) LARK/wf()e•SJ TROcTi I,2 1 1 i M , X I RM . ail ILI pA th, go. twi gzm- 05 !rv, Val Vo,Moz RIN-WITr A L 0 KrIA Q� -4721 rn 7-a ia M� JF Zt'. W MAT C —WASI -Rol, MA �z M-1 er m Rd"AR fK 1 1.ti. f 3.0 DEVELOPMENT is The project that will be built on this site is a business and family oriented hotel, comprised of 118 units and a 104 car parking garage. There will be no conference rooms or similar amenities. The stucture will contain four (4) floors. c_ i " i 4.0 ANALYSIS Based upon guidelines prepared by the Dade County Public Works Department, existing and projected traffic volumes, capacities, and other attributes were studied to determine the impact of the proposed development, utilizing Southwest 72 Street as the mayor access roadway for the investigation, since the site is only one block away. The existing Average Weekday Daily Traffic (AWDT) volume for i Southwest 72 Street at this location, was determined to be r- 24,522 vehicles (from FDOT Station Number 70, see Appendix B) . Using a "K" factor of 7.9% for four lane divided i . roadways, the peak hour volume is 1 ,937 vehicles. In addition, Metro-Dade County has previously approved other f ' projects in the area and have assigned 12 trips to this portion of Southwest 72 Street. This proposed" development is projected to generate 78 peak hour trips based on rates published in "Trip Generation" September, 1987, by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, for Land Use Code 310. See Appendix C for a copy of these rates, j The cardinal distribution of traffic for Traffic Zone (TZ) 785, which encompasses this site, shows that 54x of the to generated traffic will flow to and from the west and 46% k f' and from the east. Therefore, maximum peak hour loading of generated ' traffic from this site onto Southwest 72 Street will be 42 vehicles. This does not take into account any transit useage which would somewhat reduce this number. The total projected peak hour traffic volume on Southwest 72 Street is 1 ,991 vehicles. The hourly capacity of this roadway is 3,600 vehicles. These figures show a 55% utilization of roadway capacity and a remaining reserve capacity of 1,609 vehicles after this development is occupied. -. c ' 5.0 CONCLUSIONS E Since the additional traffic impact of the proposed t .. development is extremely small (projected at 42 peak-hour trips) and the existing roadway volume is well below the roadway capacity, this study concludes that no appreciable traffic impact will occur along Southwest 72 Street due to this development. This project should therefore be approved according to the standards of the Service Concurrency .Review. i L:.... l l t 1 I j t ' I ' i APPENDIX A r : -et y�wt` �. a ^F r?"�.a-:'7t` r+';--.�'��'r' � ° �;:ZG N+� � k�.' A''3*es�,. ..�;.•�W wi^F:.a+w��.r..,....,,.�as-.,.w-s..m�—.,,bw,,..-.Y,...w:, �:-a;k.��' �q.a`R'_`°..a��3s"'"U:M".�.r''^a'"�'�..$ ��'.'a. r77 r R A I' M D "I M Alte�_ t'p_ 3:Lem No 2 i TO DATE July 1.1 , 1989 SUBJECT Substitute Alternate 0 rd_1 n a-i Providing Land Development C/:�.,'M Regulations Required by Chat ;�1 163 , F . S . FVOM P . r. , P .L.S . ColInt%V Manager 89 - 6 6 Recommenclation It is recommended that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the attached Alternate Ordinance on July 11 , 1989 Background Chapter 163 , Florida Statutes (F.S . ) requires that within one year after submission of its revised comprehensive plan for review by the State, each county must adopt or amend and enforce land development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan. (s . 163 . 3202 , F.S . ) For Dade County, the target date was July 1 , 1989 . At a minimum., all local governments must enact regulations which: regulate the subdivision of land; regulate the use of land and water and ensure the compatibility of adjacent. uses and provide for open space; provide for protec- tion of potable water wellfields; regulate areas subject to seasonal and periodic flooding and provide for drainage and stormwater management: ; ensure the protection of environmentally sensitive lands; regulate signage; provide that public facilities and services meet or exceed the standards established in the comprehensive plan and are available when needed for the develop- ment, or that development orders and permits are conditioned an the availability of these public facilities and services , and that development orders or permits shall not be issued which would result in a reduction in the level of services for the affected public facilities below the level of services provided in the comprehensive plan; and ensure safe and convenient on site traffic flow, consideri-ng needed vehicle parking. 3-t is the conclusion of staff that Dade County already possesses all of. the required land development regulations with the excep- tion of the requirement termed the "service concurrency regula- tion" . The attached ordinance is proposed to comply with this statutory requirement. Other regulatory adjustments including adjustments to zoning may be needed to improve implementation' of the CDMP, but with the foregoing exception, minimum requirements are already met . Provisions of the Service Concurrency Management Program The administrative approach established by this Ordinance would build upon existing County evaluation and permitting processes and would expand the scope of existing reviews to address the neces- sai.-y level of e r e (LOS) standards . The applicable LOS s I..a i i d a r d s re 1.a t t r oa cla a y s public transit, water supply, wastewater , flood protection, parks , and solid waste disposal . Individual County (lopartments would review applications for zoning , -subdivisions , and building permits and certain environ- mental permits , and would issue findings regarding current and anticipated LOS to the County board , agency, or department' respon- for, a or denying thp sted developm. pnf- rirrIcar _pprovJng_ ., reque, to highlig t c' ' areas OL cne I are included h geog ra pn JL County where surplus capacity exists for certain services and where those services would not have to be reviewed on a case-.by- case basis . Authority to approve or deny development orders would remain with the existing approval body based on the record . Provisions ' are made to include in development orders , and where appropriate in recordable documents , listings of commitments for public facilities and/or service impact mitigation measures which are requisites for -issuance of building permits or Certificates of Use and Occupancy (COs) . Honorable Mayor and Members Board of Cou»ty Commissioners - 2 - A project which receives affirmative concurrency findings at the ' subdivision approval stage should be able to progress with nog unreasonable delay through the building permit stage, with build-' ing permit review limited only to assurance a's to the provision of the applicant ' s predefined commitments . - Similarly, at the CO stage , concurrency review would - be limited to verification that; the applicant has fulfilled his or her commitments . However, applications for building permits or COs which had not previously undergone concurrency review, or were the subject of a previous but expired concurrency evaluation, would have to undergo such a, review. Provisions are included to enable affected parties to; demonstrate vested rights or taking of property through preestab lisped County procedures , and the Legislative intent of the CDMP; is incorporated by reference . A service concurrency information center would be established to. provide a central location where the public can obtain information; on the outlook for the full range of services subject to concur-, rency regulations . ' The information center would analyzereawide service conditions utilizing information provided b the service, agencies , plus building permit and zoning approval division records , Property Appraiser files, and municipal permit-, necessary to project locations of impending; ting information as constraints or surplus capacity. , i Chan es to ..the Alternate Ordinance Provisions are included in the Alternate Ordinance for the establishment of methods and criteria to be utilized by concur-, rency review agencies to analyze service impacts of prop°the developments and for the collection of fees to support additional development-review dabtivthis activities t� An associated additional information require y an agenda item requests the adoption of a Resolution approving ng The Administrative Order establishing these methods and fees . , Alternate Ordinance also includes oons , additional provisions to enable !criteria for platted subdivisions , P1 to be modified, existing certain vested final subdivision P finally-permitted developments :'to buildings to be modified, and proceed to completion without the imposition of additional facility requirements. j Change to the Substitute Ordinance The principal change made in the Substsi ,VerInGente from hsectioI cation of -the section entitled Leggy and further modifications 33G-8 ,of the..0irdinance to section 33G-2 , ' addressing vested rights . s I , : Other Contents oft* the Ordinance I kdditional provisions; are included in sive olanningel w: (Chapter - f two' other ' requremerits of the comprehen P 163 , .F.S . ):: One ;requirement of the law is that a. Land Development Regulation Commission be established tm -lementP thee CDMP nandlato; review" dev,ei' " nt ,. regulations which i p. rr�*n'mendati.ons to the .-governing body as° to the con$ist�ncy the o� ,proposed..: land,: development regtTldtiui :� �x � .�, adopted comprehensive plan. The ordinance proposes amending codified ' '.functions of the Developmental Impact Committee to per`form;'tliese functions . , Zn 'addition, Chapter 163 .3177 (3) (b) , F.S . deems that certain minor modifications _to the schedules of improvements in Improvements Element are not amendments to the comprehensive plan and may beSmade by ordinance without undergoing the lengthy CDMP irocess . -This ordinance would amend amendment p section 2-116. 1' of • the Dade County Code to enable • Dade to utilize this statutory provision within :'-1-imits established in the concurrency managetnent program. iy 7 Alter,.;:to - Agenda Item No. 2 ( i) . 7.x-11-89 ORDINANCE N0. ) - 66 ORDINANCE CREATING SECTION 33-G OF THE CODE Or'.,. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ESTABLISHING THE METRO-DADE COUNTY SERVICE . CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS; ESTABLISHING CONCURRENCY REVIEW AGENCIES; ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES; ESTABLISHING A CONCURRENCY iNFORM,ATION i CENTER; ESTABLISHING LEGISLATIVE INTENT; PROVIDING FOR EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE i REMEDIES; AMENDING SECTION 33-303 . 1 OF THE CODE OF METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING ADDITIONAL DUTIES OF THE DEVELOPMENTAL IMPACT COMMITTEE; AMENDING PFCTION 2-116 . 1 1 OF THE CODE OF MF'? P ; POLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, • PROVIDING THAT CERTAIN MODIFICATIONS TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, INCLUSION IN THE CODE, AND ; AN EFFECTIVE DATE. i WHEREAS, by;;Chapter 163 , Part 2 , Florida Statutes, the State I; of Florida has required Dade County to adopt and implement ;a comprehensive pla.n; and y WHEREAS, the State of Florida, through its Department o'f Community Affairs , has challenged the County' s Comprehensive Development Master Plan on the grounds that further actioni,s . necessary to ensure that adequate public facilities will ': be • i provided for future development and for the purposes of issui g r development orders and permits; and WHEREAS, by 'Florida Statutes Section 163 . 3202, the State: of Florida has required Dade County to adopt and enforce land. devel- opment regulations which implement the adopted comprehensive plan and which: (a) provide; that public facilities and services meet cqr exceed the. standards established in the Capital Improvements Element of the comprehensive plan; and r (b) provide that the County shall not permit development which results in a reduction in the level of services for affected .public facilities and services below that provided in the compre- hensive plan; and WHEREAS, the D.ade County Local Planning .Agency has conducted a public meeting and- review; and .. Substitute Alternate Agenda Item No. 2 (1) Page No. 2 1989 , recommended the adoption of this ordinance; and WHEREAS , Dade County ' s Master Plan will be implemented not only by this ordinance but also by various other existin� ordinances . NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMIS- . j SIONERS OF DADE COUNTY , FLORIDA: Section 1 . Section 33G, Code of Metropolitan 'Dade County, i Florida is hereby' created to read as follows: , Title section- 33G e • •shall be known as the "Metro-Dade This Chapter County Service Concurrency Management Program. " i Section 33G-2 . Legislative Intent (1) Not in this . ordinance shall be construed to be inconsistent or in conflict with the legislative intent of the adopted Comprehensive Development Master Plan as specified in section 2-114 (C) , Code of Metropolitan Dade County, Florida, and said legislative intent is hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. ; rdinance shall 2) Nothing in this o limit or modify the rights of any person. to complete any develop- m ent that has been authorized as a developmentaof regional impact pursuant to chapter 380, F.S:: {{or who has been issued, a final development orderlas riot to the adoption i o defined in this chapter, P + . � this ordinance , and dev, lopment bias corcunencea" any ubdivision in good faith'' .: , S r is continuing y waivers of plat :, :approved prior to Jul 1, And for which development has commenced and � x ood faith are' hereby determiriedl t continuing in g • be final development orders. for purposes of ' thi • i .'fc. jsection. It- is further determined that, K 9. s .. o • ' a. a pbl - _ - - Agenda Item No. 2 (i) Page No. 3 purposes of this section, 'development has commenced and is continuing in good faith if one of the; following has occurred: (a) The applicant has received prior tentative plat approval and received final plat approval within 180 days subsequent thereto, and has applied for a building permit within a period of 120 days following final plat approval= or (b) The applicant has received a waiver of plat approval and has applied for a building permit within 120 days of said approval. Section 33G-3 . Definitions Except as otherwise provided in this ordinance, ' the following definitions shall apply to this Section 33G�. ( 1) Development . Any construction, structures., creation of structures or alteration of the land sur,- face, or use of land or natural resources which requires authorization by Metro-Dade County through 'issuance of is Development Order as defined in this section. I 1 (2) Development Order or D.O. Any Initiz�1 Development Order, Intermediate Development Order, Final Development Order, or Certificate of ` Use and Occupancy'`` '.(CO) as . defined in this section. . , Ab. i (3) Capital Improvements Eldment : or CIE. The,.' Capital Improvements Element of Dade . County's: dopt 'd° r+anm r� P1RS. vE? DeV lopmP.:nt M;:�!7 O Al„an w• (Q) Certificate of Use and Occupancy or .00- ;A certificate of use and occupancy, required • pursuant. to; Section ' 33-8 , Code of Metropolitan Dade County, Florida. Substitute Alternate Agenda Item No. 2 (i) Page No. 4 (S) Concurrency Statements . ' Written reports issued by Concurrency Review Agencies summarizing existing' and. anticipated levels of service for those i public services and facilities potentially affected by a j proposed, development subject to a - request for develop-] ment order . The concurrency report shall analyze: ' (a) ' whether public facilities and ervicesmeet o exceed the standards established: yin the ii Capital Improvements Element of the. compre- hensive plan; and - j . i Cb);; whether the requested development order, if approved, would result ' in a reduction , in. the level of the service for affected. pubiio, � 1 services and facilities below the level io; service standards provided in the .-comprehenl sive development master plan. Said . report may be included in any other' timely report ,.ors recommendation of the agency which is required by statute, ordinance or regulation. ' (6)• Final Development Order. Any building permit (s) authorizing construction of a new building,•,or the expansion of floor area, or the increase in the number of dwelling units contained in an existing building, or modifications to an existing building •or site to accommodate a change in use for which a new CO , will be required, and any CO authorizing a change in the use or authorizing the initial use of a parcel or ztruc',:L:ro' or portion thereof 'where there is- no other s final development order in effect, reviewed and approved in accordance with this ordinance, authorizing said use (7) Initial Development Order Any zoning dis7 trict boundary change , use variance, ;, new use, unusual, use , special exception, site plan approval; modification A 1 Lam.:- c.•. Agenda Item No. 2 (1) , . Page No. 5 of zoning covenant or conditions, and any non-use var- iance or administrative variance, which variance would . F effectively increase the potential floor area or number of dwelling units allowed in any building or on any parcel.. (8) Intermediate Development Order. Any Tentative or Final Approval of Subdivision Plat or a Waiver 'of ' Plat and any permit authorizing the alteration of land topography required pursuant to Chapter 24 or Chapter 28, Code of Metro-Dade County. (9) . Level of Service Standards or LOS Standards'. The standards for minimum acceptable levels of service contained in the Capital Improvements Element of Dade County' s adopted Comprehensive Development Master Plan. (10) Other Service Provider. Any State, Regional, Municipal or other non-Metro-Dade County agency- having construction, operational or maintenance responsibility for Public Services or Facilities as defined herein'. (11) Public Services 'and/or Public Facilities . Services - for which Level of Service (LOS) Standards afire included in the CDMP, whether such services or . facili- ties are provided by government, quasi public or 'private 1 providers . Such services and facilities are roadways (traffic circulation) , public transit, parks , water supply, sanitary sewerage, solid waste disposal , arid- ,. -- . 1. flood protection (12) Service • Im? other' than. provision of services or ,facilities , as defined herein, which will demonstrably reduce the Impact ,}of the prospective development on said services or facilities. Substitute Alternate I Agenda Item No. 2 ( i) Page No. 6 (13) Urban Development Boundary or UDB. The Urban! Development Boundary identified on the adopted Land Used Plan map of the Comprehensive Development Master Plan. ', ( 14) Urban Infill Area or UTA. The area of Dade' County located east of, and including Northwest aAd Southwest 77 Avenue including the Palmetto Expressway ; (SR 826) , north of and including SW 232 Street. i Section 33G-4 . Concurrency Review Agencies The following Metro-Dade County departments on their successors shall serve as the concurrency review ; agencibs -for the services specified: r i (1) : Building and Zoning - Flood protection for Final Development Orders i (2) ' Environmental Resources Management - Wateri supply treatment and storage capacities and wastewater treatment capacity; water quality standards and I wastewater effluent standards; and flood protection for ! Initial Development Orders . ' I (3) ; Fire and Rescue Department - Water supply delivery pressure and fire suppression flow rate. (4) Metro-Dade Transit Agency Public transit. s , r (5) Tar ,k .and Recreation Parks. (6)r ;Public Works - Ticaffic circulation (streets, roads, h'i§hways) , . .and flood protection for Intermediate It Deve'l,opment'�Orders. (7) Solid Waste Management, - Solid waste. } Alter ate Agenda Item No. 2 (i) ' Page No. 7 Section 33G-5 . Procedures (1) As provided herein, no Development Order shall be issued where levels of service for all public servic-- es and facilities will not meet or exceed Level of Ser- vice Standards or where the issuance of the Development Order would result in a reduction in the level of ser&- vice for any service or facility below Level of Service Standards. ; i (2) When evaluating applications for development orders and impacts on levels of service and, in preparing Concurrency Statements , Concurrency Review Agencies shall utilize and apply the methods and criteria, and .shall collect fees, all as established by Administrative Order of the . County Manager and. approved by Resolution of the '-Board of County Commissioners . No Development Order shall be -granted by any County Board, Depa e rtmnt; or Agency until said Board, Department, or Agency has . received information reflecting one or more of the items listed below, as applicable . The County department having primary responsibility to serve as administrative agency 'to a Board granting development orders shall summarize and convey this information in its recommen dations to the Board: j (A) A completed Concurrency Statement .from all Concurrency Review Agencies addressing the subject application; or 1 - (B) Where the type of services 'or facil:_ities for which a Concurr.enoy' Review Agency i$ .responsi` ble are ' not impacted b a ar=ttcuia;r `t a o;t p Y P { YP initial,,: Intermediate or :Final Development. Order, .,or CO, the concurrency review. agency may fide a Statement Qf No Impact:, with -the applicable permitting' department'; agency ..or Substitute k 1 1 Alternate Agenda Item No. 2 (i) Page No. 8 board specifying the particular types ofi Development Order or CO requests which do not impact the specified service or facilities and. for which individual concurrency statements shall not be required; or (C) The applicable concurrency review agencies , in consultation with the Concurrency Informa • 1 tion Center, may designate geographic areas; of the County where certain services or facil-, ities have sufficient surplus capacity toy sustain projected development of specified. types for one (1) to five (5) or more years,' as applicable to the service. In areas so designated as having Surplus Capacity,, Development Orders or COs for the specified types of development may be issued without requiring individual concurrency statements I� for the specified services. All Surplus Capacity designations shall be reviewed no less frequently than annually.. (3) All applications for Development Orders shall specify,; in addition to other requirements, the specific uses to " which the land or structures will be put, the numbers of. single-family and multi-family res.identi.al dwel"li'nc units, and the number of square feet devoted to. ,< each non-residential use. Applications ' for. Interme- diate and Final Dos shall also specify the phasing ofj ` bu:ildlout ..if applicable, and. .any service impact` mitiga� 1 pR ?DIl measures to wl11 Ch the . apni ;^. ��. �,�ar quent'ly;' commit in a recordable written instrument' runnirig ,with the land . ` (4)i Complete applications for Initial Development Orders requiring public. hearing shall be transmitted •to all applicable Concurrency Review Agencies- '.not.=;:,later I .T I`V.✓ 1 i uk t Agenda Item No. 2 ( i) Page No. 9 than forty (40) days prior to the initial scheduled public hearing date , and Concurrency Review. Agencies shall reply by transmitting their Concurrency Statements to the agency receiving the application (application agency) within twenty-one (21) days after receipt of said applications . Applications for Initial Development Orders not requiring a public hearing shall be forwarded to all applicable Concurrency Review Agencies within fourteen (14) days after the application is verified by the application agency to be complete, and each Concur- rency Review Agency shall transmit its Concurrency Statement within fourteen (14) days after receipt of said application. An application requesting an Inter- mediate or Final Development Order shall be forwarded to all applicable Concurrency Review Agencies within three (3) days after said application is verified by the application agency to be complete. Each Concurrency Review Agency shall reply to the sending agency by transmitting its Concurrency Statement within fourteen (14) days after the receipt of said application. . If a Concurrency Review Agency is required by other Code requirements to provide comments, recommendations or approvals to the application agency, the foregoing response - dates may be modified to coincide with the response date otherwise required. Where - more than one DO is applied for simultaneously for .a development;_ a. Concurrency Review Agency may conduct a single• concur renc.y evaluation and prepare a single Concurrency: _-: Statement. Combined statements shall. contain all iri_for >, . : . mation :required prior to issuahce of the reauested` Intermediate or Final Development Order, which:ever. occurs latest in. t'he development approval brocoas and shall be' tiransmitted within the foregoing time periods . (5) All Concurrency evaluations shall reflect, currently available .information or gomputations `concern- ing the impacts on public services and facilities of F-71 F_7777 r77 F.7 Substitute Alternate Agenda Item No. 2 ( 1) Page No. 10 existing ; development, and of development previously. authorized by Intermediate and Final Department Orders which remain in effect, and of the development for; • i which a DO or CO is being requested . I (6) No development order as defined herein, shall ; be issued by any County board, agency, or department ' ' unless the following conditions are met: A. Initial Development Orders . (1) .: Levels of service for all public facilities , and services must meet or exceed LOS Standards ' and the development authorized by issuance of ' 1 the Initial DO must not result in reduction of i any LOS below LOS standards; or (2) If any service is currently operating below LOS standard, facilities necessary to serve the development at or above the applicable LOS standard are programmed in the .5-year schedule of improvements or in the list. of Anticipated ; Projects in the Capital Improvements Element; or are contained in the adopted.. 5-year-program: or adopted long-range facility plan of the applicable Other Service Provider and .the facili•ties , rare consistent with the ' CDMP;. or are determined provisionally by ;the appl'icab_le x z concurrency review agency-to be feasible, and = r the facilities would. not be inconsistent with - sa. (3j Notice is` given to the applicant in the Initial DO that said order does",•.not constitute : a final development order and that one, or more concurrency determinations will ` subsequently be required. The notice may include a provi- Substitute Alternate Agenda Item No. 2 (i) : Page No. 11 sional listing of facilities -for which commit- ments may be required prior to the issuance of an Intermediate or Final Development Order . Provisional determinations or listings of I needed facilities made in association with decisions to approve or deny Initial Develop- ment Orders shall not be binding with regard to decisions to approve or deny Intermediate or Final Development Orders on any grounds,. I • B. Intermediate Development Orders. (1) Levels of service for all public facilities r and services must meet or exceed LOS Stan- I dards, and the development authorized by issuance of the Intermediate DO must not result in a reduction of any LOS below LOS standards ; or (2) If any level of service is currently or is anticipated to fall below LOS standard, facilities necessary to serve the development at or above the applicable LOS standard are programmed in the 5-year schedule of improve- ments in the Capital Improvements, Element, or the facility is consistent with the:- CDMP and is contained in the adopted 5-year ' cap tal improvements program of the applicable .Other Service Provider; or <<L S (3) The necessary facilities are cons.i ,te n with 7 i able written instrument executed by all Par ties having an interest 'in or lien on the land, 'and running with the land hats (a): no final development order will be requested or • approved unless the necessary facilities are programmed For construction within the time i s• ' Substitute Alternate , Agenda Item No. 2 (1) Page No. 12 periods specified ' in section 33G-5 (6) (C) ; or (b) the applicant will commit to contract for provision of the necessary services or facil- ities as required in section 33G-5 (6) (C) and (4) The Intermediate Development Orders, except for commercial quarry permits and permits for , rock - plowing or wetland permitting for agri- cultural uses not involving structures, shall include a notice to the applicant that the subject approval does not constitute a final , development order and that a final development order must be preceded by a final concurrency determination except as provided in paragraph , 33G-5 (6) (C) . Intermediate DOs shall also include a listing of any services and facili- ties which the applicant agrees to provide or to contract for construction,, and . a sched- ule for the provision thereof, and a listing of any service impact mitigation measures which the applicant agrees to provide or, utilize. (5) . Applications requesting modification or, replatting of a final plat where the appli cant has demonstrated vested 'rights pursuant'. to paragraph 33G-5 (6) (B) (6) or has demon strafed vested rights in accordance with `Section 33G-9 (2) , shall not be subject to paragraphs 33G-5 (6) (B) .(1, . 2, 3, and 4) where • .. llf one or more services are operating b.'low LOS Standazds, provided that the subject pzoperty is located iiis concurrency review agency states in ...writing that the impacts on the substandard service;: imposed by the modification or replatting Will be no greater than the impact posed_ by the vested final plat and, therefore, will not result in a reduction in the lev �1 of service . r' A1.terl;�te Agenda Item No. 2 (1) Page No. 13 (6), Concurrency statements issued in association with Intermediate Development Orders shall serve as the concurrency statement required prior to issuance of Final Development Orders for the subject development provided that the applicant demonstrates to the Director of the Building and Zoning Department that: (a) the development proposal for which the final development order is requested remains sub- stantially unchanged; and (b) application for the final development order is filed (i) with- in twelve (12) months of issuance of the most recent tentative plat approval or waiver of plat approved in accordance, with section 33G-5 (6) (B)', or (ii) within twelve (12) months of the issuance of the earliest intermediate development order approved in accordance with section . 33G-5 (6) (B) if no tentative plat or waiver of plat was requested or approved pur- suant _ to this ' section. Notwithstanding . other provisions of this ordinance, if the foregoing provisions of this paragraph have been met, it is determimed that a final- development . order has been issued and development has commenced and is continuing. in good ' faith. Any building permit issued pursuant to' this paragraph shall conform : with'; requirements of: the de'v,elopment order established pursuant to Section 33G-5 (6) (B) (3 41 and;` 5) . C. .. Final Devel 2ment Orders . ' Unless otherwise provided, .by this: Ordinance, F,inaL,; Development Orders may be. approved"� only if (1) Levels of service for all pub l,id facili.tie,s and services meet or exceed LOS standa''rds , and Substitute Alternate ' Agenda Item No. 2 (i) Page No. 14 the development authorized by issuance of the Final DO will not result in reduction of any LOS below LOS standards; or (2) Where any service is currently operating below; LOS standard, assurances that facilities or services necessary to serve the development at' i or above the applicable LOS standards will be provided shall be made by one or more of the following means : (a) The necessary facilities are under construction at the time the building permit is issued; or I r (b) The necessary facilities and services are the subject of a binding executed con- tract for the construction of the facili-; ties or the provision of the services at the time the building permit is issued; or (c) The necessary ' facilities are funded and programmed for construction in year one of the County' s adopted capital budget; or (d) The facilities or services necessary to comply with the roadway or transit levels of service are programmed in the"`.CIE for construction., in or before`:. year 3: or- Ai (e) The facilities necessary to comp,ly�3with' the zoadway or transit ;levels of service ti programmed in the'' adopted`'" 5-yeaz are .• rjt capita !L LJ , �...� m e.: : � : y of the applicable Other Service Provider for construction in or before year; 3 or (f) The necessary facilities. and services are guaranteed, in an enforceable development agreement, to be provided by the develop- •� An enforceable develop -, t agreement Alterate Agenda Item No. 2 (i) '. Page No. 15 may include, but is not limited to, development agreements ' pursuant - to Section 163 . 3220, Florida Statutes or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Stat- utes; or (g) Timely provision of the necessary facili- ties will be guaranteed by other means or instrument providing equivalent assuranc- es ; and (h) If a roadway facility or transit service improvement is necessary to maintain or attain LOS Standards for a development r inside the UTA of the CDMP, the facility or service shall be contracted for construction or commencement of service , as applicable, no later than thirty-six (36) months after the date that the initial certificate of use and occupancy (CO) or certificate of completion (CC) is issued for the subject , development, or within eighteen (18) months if neces- sary to serve a development located in the area between the UDB and the UTA; and (3) In all instances where a decision to ,issue a building` permit is based on foregoing provi� sions 33G-5 (6) (C) (2) (c) (d) (e) . (f) , (g) or (h) ; the following conditions shall, apply: te 'p ocac] inside the Urban Development-` Boundary (UDB) ; and (b) The necessary facilities shall not be deferred or deleted from the :, Capital Improvements Element, or the County,' s f7777 F7 177-1 Substitute Alternate Agenda Item No. 2 (1) Page No. 16 adopted one-year capital budget unless the subject final development order , expires or is rescinded prior to the issuance of a certificate of use and occupancy (CO) or certificate of comple- tion (CC) ; and (c) Contracts shall provide that construction of the necessary facilities must proceed' to completion with no unreasonable delay, or interruption; and (d) All Final Development Orders shall include a schedule of construction. phasing, if, applicable; a listing and. schedule of any services or facilities to be provided or contracted for construc- tion by the applicant prior to the issuance of COs or CCs or within speci-. fied time periods after the issuance of COs or CCs as may be required by' Section 33G-5 (6) (C) (2) , above and any service, impact, mitigation measures to which the applicant has committed; and :: .shall require that the applicant or his.' -suc- cessor shall comply with`the requirements_. of the Final DevelopmentOrder; and (e) Service impact mitigation measurres to which the applicant: has committed as{ a , ' condition of receiving a final deveao meht order shall be recorded : ,n the public: expense of the applicant by declaration r= of restrictions executed by all parties having an interest in, or lien on the land, and running with the land. Agenda Item No. 2 (1) Page No. 17 (4) Applications requesting modification, altera- tion, or repair of a lawfully existing struc- ture shall not be subject to paragraphs 33G-5 (6) (C) ( 1 , 2 , and 3) , where one or more , services are operating below LOS Standards , provided that the applicable concurrency , review _ agency states in writing that the impact on the substandard service imposed by the use to be accommodated by the requested modification or alteration will be no greater than the impact posed by the most recent law- ful use accommodated by said structure and therefore will not result in a reduction in the level of service. • T (5) Issuance of new Certificates of Use and Occupancy for uses of parcels or structures, or portions thereof, which were not previously reviewed under provisions of this ordinance are defined as Final DOs and must be evaluated pursuant to the provisions of Section 33G-5 (6) (C) . It is provided, however, that the requirements of paragraphs 33G-5 (6) (C) (1., 2, and 3) shall not apply to a change of use of an existing lawful structure or parcel. or portion thereof if the applicable concurrency review agency states in writing that ..the ' impact on the substandard service imposed by: the new requested''use will be no greaaer ahan; the impact posed by the most recent previous. , lawful use of the subject parcel or 'structure r _ or. pertinent, portion thereof and th` refore� will not `result in a .reductio:n in the level .of.. service. (6) Prior to the issuance of any .Final Development Order, the applicant shall furnish adequate { iN:. Substitute Alternate Agenda Item No. 2 (i) Page No. 18 bond of one hundred ten (110) percent of cost of services or facilities which he is required to construct, contract for construction, or otherwise provide. Said bond shall be retained by the county until the pertinent facilities or service are accepted by the County' or otherwise certified by the County to have been completed in accordance with this ordinance and any other applicable County I requirements . D. Certificate of Use and Occupancy and -Certificates of iCompletion. (1) Certificates of Use and Occupancy, and Certificates of Completion may be issued without requirement for additional concurrency statements by concurrency review agencies where the applicant. for the CO or CC holds a valid Final Development Order for the identical use of the; subject structure or site or pertinent portion thereof, which final development order contains no conditions requiring the applicant to provide: or contract for the construction of necessary services or , facilities , and said final development order :-contains no obligation for the •applicant ao provide or commit to util-iae 'servace ':'impact mitigation measures. i'. requirements for the applicant to provide or , to contract for the provision­_of, services -or facilities, or to provide or commit to utilize. service impact mitigation measures, no CO or CC shall be issued until it is certified by the concurrency review agency responsible for ~�y W4.', e V7777 ' Alter� �te i) Agenda Item No. 2 ( Page No. 19 the affected service or facility that the required facility, service or service impact mitigation measure has been provided or con- tracted for provision- No additional concur- rency statements are required prior to issu- ance of COs or CCs in these instances . Section 33G-6 . Reserved Section 33G-7 . ConcurrencY Information Center concurrency information center shall be (1) p, established by Dade County. The concurrency information center shall provide the p ublic, upon request, informs and anticipated capacities and levels tion on existing this ordinance. of service of all services addressed by facility and f Y This information will reflect existing facilit and service capacities , planned and committed Y service capacity . increasisting es or extensions , and ex comm service demands . The center shall compile and co - and analyze information on service and facility ci ties and improv and commitments provi ded ac by ement p laps l concurrency review agencies , and • information on al ment active Initial, ' Intermediate , and Final Develop provided by County Perm agencies, the Orders as P al permit department of property appraisal, and municip P ting agencies as necessary . The concurrency Information Center shall, tC (2D feasible; develop and maintai the maximum extent t iv. e Intel com utations of development authorized by ac,F P d Final Development Orders. Thta inEormatic. mediate an - f( • ,. A A a .... ;a fn xm useful will be cater�dr =::: b dates, form Comprehensive Development Master Phan up. p l at'ion of concurrency ..statements ,..,projection .of facile ca acities , and private sector needs. County boars P ies which issue Development OrdE departments and agcnc and Certificates of. Use and Occupancy shall periodica i Substitute Alternate Agenda Item No. 2 (1) Page No. 20 furnish the Concurrency Information Center with records of such approved orders and Certificates in electronic or written form suitable for the purposes of the Concurrency Information Center . (3) The Concurrency Information Center shall `assist the Concurrency Review Agencies in': . (a) formu- lating updated methods and criteria for analyzing appli- cations for development orders and level of service impacts; and (b) in updating concurrency analysis .fees. Said methods shall be adopted by Administrative order of the County Manager and shall become effective upon approval by resolution of the Board of County Commis- sioners . . Reasonable fees for conducting concurrency analyses , providing written information, and for, pro- viding services to support the concurrency management program may be charged and collected upon establishment of a schedule of reasonable fees by administrative order of the County Manager which shall become effective upon approval by resolution of the Board of County Commis- sioners . Section 33G-0 . Reserved. Section .33G-9 . .Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies (1) No person aggrieved by any resolution=,` order, requirement, decision or determination. of any;. County Board, Department or Agency in applying the provisions' �a >7 h f of this ordinance to any application or. .request ,.for 'they > ssuance of a development order mak apx�ly to t)ie court for relief unless he has first exhausted all applicable administrative remedies provided in the; Code of Metro ' poiitan Dade County, Florida. (2) Nothing in this ordinance shall be construed or applied to constitute a tem orar' or permanent .- t .k.ing :. :;. P y P -• of private property without just compen.s.,atio:nor,, e_ t:h .:"'; Subst'.` ,ute Alte�!We Agenda Item No. 2 (1) Page No. 21 abrogation of vested rights . Any property owner alleg- ing that this ordinance , as applied, constitutes or would constitute a temporary or permanent taking of private property or an abrogation of vested rights must affirmatively demonstrate the legal requisites of the claim by exhausting the administrative remedy provided in Section 2.-.114 .1,. Code of Metropolitan Dade County, Florida . The procedures set forth in Section 2-114 . 1 for the review of claims pertaining to the application of the Comprehensive Development Master Plan shall con- stitute the procedures for the review of claims regard- ing the application of this ordinance. Notwithstanding any contrary provisions of the Code of Metropolitan Dade T County, no property owner claiming that this ordinance as applied constitutes or would constitute a temporary or permanent taking of private property or an abrogation vested rights may pursue such claim in court or before a quasi-judicial body unless ihe has first exhausted the administrative remedies provided herein. Section 2. Section 33-303 . 1 , Code of Metropolitan Dade County, Florida is amended as follows : l� Sec . 33-303 . 1 Developmental Impact Committee (D) Duties of the developmental' impact committee: The developmental impact , commmittee} shall. perform' the following duties' i (15) Serve as the Land Develo ment Regulation Commission as provided -for :in Section r f,� 163 . 3164 , Florida IStatute`s,�_ and develop,.' t recommend, and review land development 1% - Words stricken -. through shall be deleted. Underscored words constitute the ainendment proposed. Remaining provisions, are now in effect and remain unchanged'._,. 1 - 1 Substitute Alternate i Agenda Item No. 2 (i) ' Page No. 22 regulations , or amendments thereto, and make recommendations to the board of county commissioners as to the consis tency of the proposal with the Compre hensive Development Master Plan. Section 3 . Section .2-116. 1 Code of Metropolitan Dade County, Florida is' hereby amended as follows: Sec. 2-116 . 1 Biennial Amendment Procedure for the i Comprehensive Development Master Plan. j i (9) The foregoing procedure shall bei the exclusive procedure for amending all elements - of the Compre- hensive Development Master Plan (CDMP) ; provided, however, that the following modifications to 'the „• Capital Improvements Element Schedule of Improve ments shall not be deemed to be amendments to ..the , CDMP and may be made by Ordinance ofithe Board of i County Commissioners -without regard to foregoing ': sections 2-116 . 1 (1) through (5) : „ (a) . Corrections, updates and `modifications;'con cerninq`costs , revenue source s;; acceptance' r �• of facilities pursuant to .dedications w1ACh are consistent : with the CDMP j�1:•a'nd ` (b).... The date of constructioin. of S)'o facility r r ;enumerated . in .the Scheduhe of. Improvements 'provided that said facili'tyis: ;not requ`i 'red to prevent existing or anticipated service '. from falling below the Plan' s level of service standards . i i r STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF DADE ) I , RICHARD P . DRINKER , Clerk of the Circuit Court in and for Dade County , Florida , and Ex-Officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of said County, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of ORDINANCE OR SECTION (s) of CODE of Dade County, Florida, as appears of record . 1 . ORDINANCE NO. 89-66 adopted by the said Board of County Commissioners at its meeting held on July 11 , 19_89 The effective date of this ORDINANCE is : Ten (10) days after the date of its enactment.�l r 2 . SECTION (s) of CODE of . Dade County , Florida. - I SAID SECTION(s) are/were in full force and effect as of: IN WITNESS WHEREOF , I have hereunto, 'set:•my hand and official seal on . this 18th day of Jul-y -A, D. 19 89 RICHARD P . BRINKER, ,Ex-Of f ici.o Clerk Board 'of. County Commissioners Dade Cou y, Fiorila Y Dep tY Irk :. SeA. ; No • z:: M e • �C OUN7Y 6) •'�. � * * •,.�'� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS •••••*.a DADE COUNTY , FLORIDA l E I_ APPENDIX B I � �3 Lam' �J ' t t 1956 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TP.AFFIC' (AADT) COUNT LIST FROM FLORIDA D.O.T. MAINTAINED COUNT STATIONS PUBLISHED BY METRO—DADE P .W.D. / TRAFFIC SECTION 5TATWN _.. _.._ . S.TATL.ON__yOCATZ_ON�EEO.A�PTZ4N_...__........ _._....._. MDT. 43 KROME AV (SW 177 AV) SOUTH OF SW 296 ST 11084 t" 0 44 GALLOWAY RD (SW 87 AV) SOUTH OF FLAGLER ST 35261 3 j. 45 SW 107 AV (SR 985) NORTH OF SW 88 ST 26260 Q 46 SW 107 AV (SR 985) NORTH OF SW 72 ST 22126 ry 47 SW 107 AV (SR 985) SOUTH OF SW 40 ST 1219 50 SW 112 AV (ALLAPATTAH DR) NORTH OF HEFT 13841 c, 52 KROME AV (NW 177 AV) SOUTHWEST OF OKEECHOB E RD 3836 C 54 QUAIL ROOST DR (SW 186 ST) WEST OF HEFT 14501 r- cr- 56 SW 152 ST (CORAL REEF DR) EAST OF SW 112 AV 13594. 58 KILLIAN DR ( SW 112 ST) WEST OF SW 87 AV 44315 60 KENDALL DR (SW- 88 ST) EAST OF SW 137 AV 62 KENDALL DR ( SW 88 ST) EAST OF SW 127 AV j 56176 64 KENDALL DR ( SW 88 ST) EAST OF SW 103 AV 47082 r 66 KENDALL DR ( SW 88 ST) WEST OF SW 87 AV 46228 68 SW 72 ST ( SUNSET DR) EAST OF SW 107 AV 32343 23134 70 SW 72 ST (SUNSET DR) WEST OF US 1 72 BIRD RD ( SW 40 ST) EAST OF HEFT 33016 ' 74 BIRD RD (SW 40 ST) EAST OF SW' 107 AV 35799 42722 76 BIRD RD ( SW 40 ST) WEST OF SW 87 AV 57347 73 BIRD RD ( SW 40 ST) EAST OF SW' 78 CT 49283 '.= 100 BIRD RD ( SW 40 ST) WEST OF SW 57 AV 82 BIRD RD (SW 40 ST) EAST OF SW 42 AV 3433 84 SW 344 ST ( SR 27 ) WEST OF SW 187 AV 0201 10205 86 CORAL WAY (SE 13 ST) WEST OF BRZCKELL AV 88 TAMIAMI TRAIL (SW 8 ST) EAST OF SW 137 AV : 22892 90 TAMIAMI TRAIL (SW 8 ST) EAST OF SW 109 AV 2923- 92 TAMIAMI TRAIL ( SW 8 ST) EAST OF SW 87 AV 472 0 0 94 FLAGLER ST ( SR 968) WEST OF NW/SW 42 AV 30253 97 FLAGLER ST ( SR 968) WEST OF NW/SW 27 AV 28398 96 SW 1 ST WEST OF SW 8 AV, ONE-WAY EASTBD 11503 13588 �.� 98 FLAGLER ST WEST OF NW/SW 8 AV, ONE WESTBD 100 SE 1 ST WEST OF BISCAYNE BLVD, ONE-WAY EASTBD 9916 100 FLAGLER ST WEST OF BISCAYNE BLVD, ONE-WAY WESTBD 46662 f102 NW 36 ST (SR 948) WEST OF NW 42 AV. 10 NE 82 ST ( SR 934) WEST OF NE 3 PL, ONE-WAY WESTBD 17306 _-: 104_ ( 23089 107 NW 36 ST ( SR 25) WEST OF NW . 37 AV 25384 � = 109 OKEECHOBEE RD (US 27 ) NORTHWEST OF NW 103 ST 110 US 1 ( SOUTH DIXIE HWY) S OF JCT WITH PALMETTO EXPWY 38964 112 NW 103 ST (W 49 ST, HIALEAH) WEST OF LEJEUNE RD 35,695 118 TAMIAMI TRAIL ( SW 8 ST) EAST OF SW 57 AV 31592 NW 103 ST (SR 932) WE 26569 ST OF NW 7 AV 121 24295 _i 122 NW 119 ST (GRATIGNY DR) WEST OF NW 7 AV 124 163 ST ( SR 826 ) WEST OF COLLINS AV, MIAMI BEACH 27253 NE 12 5 ST ( SR 9 2 2 ) EAST OF NE 6 AV 27182 36352 127 US 1 ( SOUTH DIXIE HWY) SOUTHWEST OF SW 57 AV 27587 128 US 441 (NW 7 AV) NORTH OF NW1119 ST 7630 131 KROME AV ( SW 177 AV) SOUTH OF SW 328 ST 21057 132 96 ST ( SR 922 ) WEST OF HARDING AV, BAL HARBOUR 31100 135 NW 27 AV ( SR 9 ) NORTH OF NW 95 ST 16649 136 NW 138 ST ( SR 916 ) EAST OF NW 67 AV y �i ` APPENDIXI C HOTEL (310) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: ROOMS E... On a: WEEKDAY i` PEAK HOUR OF ADJACENT STREET TRAFFIC, ONE HOUR BETWEEN 4 AND 6 P.M. i - TRIP GENERATION RATES F Average Vehicle Trip Ends(Weekday—Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 P.M.)per Room i E;: Average Range of Standard Number of Average Number of Trip Rate Rates Deviation Studies Rooms f 0.664 0.310-1.026 7 243.9 is { DATA PLOT AND EQUATION , 500 -- ❑ 450 0 400 z w 350 w 300 J f. U w 250 w 200 w 150 II 100 ❑ ❑ 50 ❑ 0 100 200 300 400 500 r , I_ X = NUMBER OF ROOMS ❑ ACTUAL DATA POINTS FITTED CURVE Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 1.30 Ln(X) - 2.15 R2 = 0.838 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION: 54% enter,'46%exit. Trip Generation,September 1987/Institute of Transportation Engineers 466 7 4 MIAMI VILLA HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY F MMA #490 MILES MOSS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 12900 S.W. 84 ST. MIAMI, FLORIDA 33183 APRIL, 1990 `"� �k ACC'�,�x y�� '� _;"C• °'s .`Y`t �� .a+ • _ ... /ids / . /������%G/%"G^ .' ..�� { !S h Jill V F CONTENTS 1 .0 BACKGROUND. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2.0 . STUDY AREA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 AREAMAP, FIGURE 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 NEIGHBORHOOD MAP, FIGURE 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 NEIGHBORHOOD AERIAL PHOTO, FIGURE 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.0 DEVELOPMENT. . . . � . . . . . . . . � . . . . . . . . . . . 6 i ! 4.0 ANALYSIS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . 7 5.0 CONCLUSIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 APPENDIX (A) DADE COUNTY ORDINANCE 89-66 (B) FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC COUNT (C) ITE TRIP GENERATION RATES I 4 � t I t , { I ti I I 1 .0 BACKGROUND This study is presented to satisfy the requirements of Dade County Ordinance 89-66 and Florida Statute 163.3202 regarding the "Service Concurrency Review" . Specifically, this study addresses the impact which the j proposed development is projected to have on nearby traffic. Existing and projected transportation facilities, roadway capacities, traffic volumes, traffic circulation. patterna, and traffic control devices have been reviewed for this report. Methodology used for this examinlation is based upon guidelines g presented by the Dade County Public Works Department. Appendix A includes a copy of Dade County Ordinance 89-66. i I 2.0 STUDY AREA The subject of this investigation is a site at 5952 S.W. 70 St. , which lies within the City of South Miami, Florida. This site is located between Southwest 70 St. and Southwest 71 St. , immediately _ west of the South Miami Metrorail Station. This neighborhood is a residential and commercial office mixed area. Southwest 70 and 71 streets are two-way, .two-lane, undivided roadways. The nearest arterial roadway to the site which may be affected by increased traffic is Southwest 72 St. (Sunset i Drive) . Figure 1 illustrates the South :Dade County area and highlights the study area. Figure 2 presents a view of the study area neighborhood, highlighting the sub?eci site, and Figure 3 is an aerial photograph of the study area neighborhood to the same scale as Figure 2. -2- Rum MENA c i�fCiEeie�\;ar :j�'� QE•�I1i���■�lN1�t t®�!�'17® I�'±E■�� �/rL tmi s ri�—. I-1i!m �0 s � ®� s�si■�am � �� � \v11�l�t�af�,1 .;;��"i.r G'^'Lml��■ W iLl�!'�h� _ f�i?ti► a-��o �� ���� � �� � y� ! eee�eeeu e��■ia�.�u We ,�. 1 :ee ce. �sis4O r [*�Le��m n' 0 k 77MB]RE WE 2 -mm PIC S AWN law— EMT =n Nit IN ffg ee Mm. -q,3 u m i °"":"',.'e���-__-__-P%, (�AII�\Iie...... - IN as �-. '�:I•L'a7� 3 Y4'�;.+E] �y.43 viEMG.N= - A-UT M IN IBM iii ter✓-�.�1 A, mom M 11 0 Elm 11 1_ vv rr �■ �� �� �Il' 11 1= 11 11 Elm 11 ■l1 11 �_ . 1 o 11 ■�l 11 1= 11 MIN Elm 11 1R r� rw m1 1m Elm IN m Elm SO � ��f�l���c�oQ�l�. _1111111 111111111 !' - ©1111111 1�111111� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII���„��r�����. ., , _ _ llllllllllllllfl I ♦ �. ♦ ,/ �� - �Illllllllllll� — �� .�� �♦ � . �111�111111111111� =lIIIIIIIIIIIIIII �. �� .e , _, r _ � - 11111111111111111 = Iflifllllllll��...o�.o ,, � 1 - Illlllfi ®� ,� �'s 1.8 was • z 5 WE lr%wmi N10% %VP jow tt ME ww 7 fit! !M.5 ifi 'If SIN "pj Mllfi t7, XWO T�' IMP TIE t 17VI gn le,m PM 'A —A —012" X, T71 MW7pWl g eq r AS 91, —xo agr T M -.111"T IN %. I NO' FRI;, gg 5114i 'Ri" Wtl my s 3.0 DEVELOPMENT The project that will be built on this site is a business and family oriented hotel, comprised of 118 units and a 104 car parking garage. There will be no conference rooms or similar amenities. The stucture will contain four (4) floors. �p x N i f I 4 .0 ANALYSIS i Based upon guidelines prepared by the . Dade .County Public Works Department, existing and projected traffic volumes, capacities, and other attributes were studied to determine the impact of the proposed development, utilizing Southwest t 72 Street as the major access roadway for the investigation, since the site is only one block away. i f . The existing Average Weekday Daily Traffic (AWDT) volume for I Southwest 72 Street at this location,1 was determined to be 24,522 vehicles (from FDOT Station Number 70, see Appendix B) . Using a "K" factor of 7.9% for four lane divided i roadways, the peak hour volume is 1:1,937 vehicles. In addition, Metro-Dade County has previously approved other projects in the area and have assigned 12 trips to this E portion of Southwest 72 Street. This proposed development is projected to generate 78 peak hour trips based on rates publishedl� in "Trip Generation" r r September, 1987, by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, for Land Use Code 310. See Appendix C for a copy of these rates. t I The cardinal distribution of trafficifor Traffic Zone (TZ) 785, which encompasses this site, shows that 57 of the generated traffic will flow to and from the west and 46% to i' t t -7- z ®R and from the east. Therefore, maximum peak hour loading of generated traffic from this site onto Southwest 72 Street will be 42 vehicles. This does not take into account any transit useage which would somewhat reduce this number. The total projected peak hour traffic volume on Southwest 72 Street is 1 ,991 vehicles. The hourly capacity of this roadway is 3,600 vehicles. These figures show a 55% utilization of roadway capacity and a remaining reserve capacity of 1,609 vehicles after this development is occupied. 5.0 CONCLUSIONS Since the additional traffic impact of the proposed development is extremely small (projected at 42 peak-hour s trips) and the existing roadway volume is well below the roadway capacity, this study concludes that no appreciable traffic impact will _ occur along Southwest 72 Street due to this development. This project should therefore be approved according to the standards of the Service Concurrency Review. j i i i APPENDIX A r i � e I i I i I++ 1 n R A H I') H M A I 1-n- 1-tem No. 2 M TM C 5 1)1\`.01:Ma TO EINE Od i LA SUMTECT Al ternate rnFr Providing J,and Development Reqiilat ions Required by 1.63 1•, . S . F%M161 .1 o A sip . ; . A v J.11 col 11 t,., q e r 8, 9 . 66 flecomine nrl a t i 01-1 is recommended that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the attached Al.ternatq' ot.,dinance on J%.tly 11 , 1.989 cliapter. 163 , rlorida Statutes (F .S . ) requires that within one Naha its revised comprehensive plan for review 11M year after submission of by the State , each cok"ItY must adopt or amend and enforce land development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan. (s . 163 . 3202 , F.S . ) For :Dade County, the Inust e 1989 . At a minimum, all local governments target date regulations datt was July 1 , which: regulate the subdivision of land; regulate the Use of land and water and ensure the compatibility provide for open space; provide for proted- IF of- adjacent us and &, r welifields ; regulate areas subject to SM ti.on of pot,')-)Ie water seasonal and periodic flooding and provide for drainage and stor► water management; ensure the protection of environmentally sensitive lands ; regulate signage; provide that public facilities t or exceed the standards established in tile and services meet- able when needed for the develop- ment , or that development orders and permits are conditioned oil the availability Of these public facilities and services, and that development orders or permi ts shall not ' be issued which would result in a reduction in the level of services for the affected public facilities below the level of -services provided in the comprehensive plan; and ensu re safe and convenient on site I traffic flow, considering needed vehicle parking. I't is the conclusion of staff. that Dade County I already possesses all of the required land development regulation s with the excep- tion of the requirement termed the "service concurrency regula- tion" . The attached ordinance is proposed to comply with this requirement. other regulatory adjustments including statutory Iiing may be needed to improve implementation of adjustments to ZO the CDMP, but with the foregoing exception, minimum requirements are already met . Provisions of tile Service Conciii-rency Management Pro—gram The administrative approach established by this Ordinance would evaluation and permitting processes and,L; build upon existing County Ce s scope of existing reviews to address the ne U 1M would expand the I sa):y level of e r c e (110s) standards . The applicable st-.andards . relate I'-C) roadways , public transit,L water supPly,1114, wastewater , flood Pfotectl oil, parks , and solid waste disposal . Individual County (lopartments would review applications f or" zoning , -subdivisions , and building. permit s and certain environ mental permits , and would issue findings regarding current and anticipated LOS to the County board, agency, or deipartment' respon- sible for approving or denying the requested development order . P rovisions are included * to highlight q eoqraohic areas of the County where surplus capacity exi:i,. . I where those services would not have to be reviewed on a case-by- case basis . Authority to approve or deny development orders would remain with the existing approval body based on the record, in developmen1t* orders , and where to include Provisions * are made- s appropriate in recordable documents , itment for listings of conim public facilities and/or service impact mitigation measures which issuance are requisites for: issuance building permits or CertificateF - of Use and occupancy (COS) . __. --`—'�''�"�•�+t.feS:lQi.i�..a1.MNlss�-'i►:�.a.r.. ...�..__. Honorable Mayor and Members - 2 - Board of County Commissioners A project which receives affirmative concurrency findings with the ! subdivision approval stage should be able to progress with build-1 unreasonable delay through the building permit stage, provision of ing permit review limited only to assurance as to the p Q at the CO the applicant ' s predefined commitments . Similarly, stage , concurrency review would s b orl her ecommitment verification HowevertI the applicant has fulfilled h applications for building permits or COs which had not previously or were the subject of a previous undergone concurrency review, would have to undergo such a. but expired concurrency evaluation, parties to review. Provisions are included- to enableerffhQ 9 preestab demonstrate vested rights or taking of prop Y lished County procedures , and the Legislative intent of the CDMP; is incorporated by reference . ' enc information center would be established on'obtain A service concurrency provide a central location where a opublic services -subject itooconcur-; on the outlook for the Full rang the service; rency regulations . The information center would analyze asery e service conditions utilizing information provided by ermit and zoning approval records, sub-; agencies , plus building p and municipal permit- Appraiser records , Property Appraiser files , endin information as -necessary to project locations of impending' mp 9. ting , constraints or surplus capacity . Chan es to .the Alternate Ordinance criteria be utilized by concur Provisions are included in the Alternate Ordinance for the - to M establishment o£ methods and p proposed, rency review agencies to analyze service impacts of art th developments and for treviewllactivities and to to develop the additional ';-;develop program. An associated add t- onal '. .?nformation required by this p raving .''an agerida ` tem .requests the".:-, .of a Resolution app, The . .,:.. hts Admini.strats'v.e Order estso llincludes eSadditional and s rig Alternate " 70rd1nance al is °for.`;:platted subdivisions , additional provisions ' t 1111 ing !criter .,,.: cex tain ' .v.es,ted final subdivision plats plat permitt d a developments;:!t� buildings. ,{to be letonea.without the imposition of additiona � proceed to ;comp. i` facility requirements. Chan e to the. Substitute Ordinance 77 ;,;,:. .; change in the Substitute Ordinance is the r.eloi The, princ`i:pal •.cnang intent from ' of• .the; se'ction entitled Legislate d further mod if;icatQn� cation to section 33G-2, r .:. _ "of ;the ,Ordinance 3.3G=18..; s• I ight S �vesed,'r i . J addressing�.: t. � Other Contents of ' the Ordinance T fr :( j :: F ,� ` aiddess tote ordinance . ,to ' *•;, ovisions- ,:are included in lanning:'.1?!W' Ct ,,�ej� ! Add tion�l�' p m nt uirements of the comprehensive p two f other. �req .,� tile. tp to . o£ law is that ;a Land{^ P 1 '°' : One' requirement a xgC mend .:s�. Y • e •,� shed ,..�to •cAeve 1 p�.; o, Commission ber• :eetabl im °lement the°� CDMP��►� � -ZI �i.e ti regt Jiiii.ons u hlch�; p.• ��t�d'L theme �y 4, ;�� `�e ��,� ��►�'� bbdji. as dothT g tf . , ma`k„r b e dkati.oris y F T`° amndme ;tg .,�. or t�p� t e 1'an. The =ordi: ande . om r hensv. p . Comm�i 3ado.p'ted� L ?,,. » , f he Developmental Impact , Ott 'to i:�ed f:un0,tion's..: o t , . e ' ,o ea f n 't�'se,'Ifth&tt ons: :«: l p�yr{orm+� ,, -y, �.t at .certain minor JN, to h 3 deems th '' �L� ditt Chapter 163 .3177 (3) (b) F'Sements` in 'the CP.Wk ,tal rov t ..,r. . , modi`.f"ications:Y o 'the schedules of imp.,- ., CDMP rovements:; Element are not amendmensnder toirigttieelengivy plan Imp b8; made:"by,:. :oidina_ nce without,a,u 9 ,. Z" 116:12 of and ;ma .rt:, ,,.:.. This ordinance would amend section roce , ame:ndmenti P::. .,Code to enable , Dade to utilize 'this statutozY the.;;' Dade;::;County...:;, ` on `'Coup i n`�;1'imits established in the concurrency`management provisif program. r • Agenda Item No. 2 (i) g %) . 66 7H11-s9 --`ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE CREATING SECTION 33-G OF THE CODE OF METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ESTABLISHING THE METRO-DADE COUNTY SERVPROVIDING ICE CONCURRENCY MAN ESTABLISHINGR CONCURRENCY DEFINITIONS; REVIEW AGENCIES; ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES; ESTABLISHING A CONCURRE 8L11TIVE O NATION ' CENTER; ESTABLISHING LEGISLATIVE PROVIDING FOR EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES; AMENDING SECTION 33-303 . 1 OF THE CODE OF METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING ADDITIONAL DUTIES OF THE DEVELOPMENTAL IMPACT COMMITTEE; AMENDING j SECTION 2-116 . 1 OF THE CODE OF METRO- POLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, • PROVIDING THAT**: CERTAIN MODIFICATIONS TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED i TO BE AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN; PROVIDING SEVERAgILITY, INCLUSION IN THE CODE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. i i WHEREAS, by,;Chapter 163 , Part 2 , Florida Statutes, the State of Florida has !"required Dade County to adopt and implement comprehensive plan; and i the State of Florida, through its Departmentoif WHEREAS, , Communit Affairs , has challenged the County' s Comprehensive Y - 1 Development Master Plan on the grounds that further action necessary ublic facilities will , be to ensure that adequate p prov.ided .;for future development and for . the purposes of issui g development orders and permits; and ;Y State of LA "WHEREAS, . by:*'Florida Statutes Section 163 . 3202 , the, F,.lorida has required Dade County to adopt and enforce land :devel- � .. . apmen:t r.e;gulations which implement the adopted comprehens.iv,e plan and­.whicli (a)� provide;: that public facilities and services meet Qr exceed the,: • standar'ds established in the Capital Improvements ,. 'dement o.fi.:the comprehensive plan; and +: a' K3 ,. �.me - t ,provide that . :the County shall nbt permit devs,lap ,� ,t g m :4). ) i,�' �. a-t,Y} - i y"t .!" _ .,_ _ ..,• " - .`.,• ... which resu`lis xn a. reduction in the level of services for affected n �. Public litie and services below ta,ati; faci s - x . :. hensiver'plan; and R" y ' WHEREAS, the Dade County Local. Planning ;Agency has `conducted +• F +a'''publicr meetsri9' and' review; and h 1 1 A e APPENDIX B i n COUNT LIST ! :. 1988 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT} ; FROM FLORIDA D.O.T. MAINTAINED COUNT STATIONS PUBLISHED BY METRO-DADE P.W.D. / TRAFFIC SECTION AADT STATION .i ................. 11084 0 43 KROME AV (SSW SW787VAV)SOUTH SOUTHFOFWFLAGLER ST 35261 44 GALLOWAY ( 26260 45 SW 107 AV ( SR 985) NORTH OF SW 88 ST 22126 tr 46 SW 107 AV (SR 985) NORTH OF SW 72 ST 12199 47 SW 107 AV ( SR 985) SOUTH OF SW 40 ST 13841 c 50 SW 112 AV (ALLAPATTAH DR) NORTH OF HEFT 3836 cc 52 KROME AV (NW 177 AV) SOUTHWEST OF OKEECHOBEE RD 14501 Q 54 QUAIL ROOST DR (SW 186 ST) WEST OF HEFT j 23913. 56 SW 152 ST (CORAL REEF DR) EAST OF SW 112 AVi 1594 5g KILLIAN DR (SW 112 ST) WEST OF SW 87 AV 44315 60 KENDALL DR (SW 88 ST) EAST OF SW 137 AV 56176 62 KENDALL DR (SW 88 ST) EAST OF SW 127 AV 47082 64 KENDALL DR (SW 88 ST) EAST OF SW 103 AV 46228 h 66 KENDALL DR (SW 88 ST) WEST OF SW 87 AV 32343 68 SW 72 ST ( SUNSET DR) EAST OF SW 107 AV 231341"' 70 SW 72 ST (SUNSET DR) WEST OF US 1 33016 72 BIRD RD ( SW 40 ST) EAST OF HEFT 35799 74 BIRD RD (SW 40 ST) EAST OF SW 107 AV 42722 76 BIRD RD ( SW 40 ST) WEST OF SW 87 AV I 57347 78 BIRD RD ( SW 40 ST) EAST OF SW 78 CT 49283 00 BIRD RD ( SW 40 ST) WEST OF SW 57 AV 34826 82 BIRD RD (SW 40 ST) EAST OF SW 42 AV 7101 24 SW 344 ST ( SR 27 ) WEST OF SW 187 AV 102-35 86 CORAL WAY (SE 13 ST) WEST ST BFISWE L AV AV I 22892 88 TAMIAMI TRAIL (SW 8 ST) EA a 90 iAMIAMI TRAIL (SW 8 ST) EAST OF SW 109 AV 2_2 3 `J 92 TAMIAMI TRAIL, (SW 8 ST) EAST OF SW 87 AV 47 2:30253 94 FLAGLER ST ( SR 968) WEST OF NW/SW 42 AV I 23398 97 FLAGLER ST ( SR 968) WEST OF NW/SW 27 AV 115£3 98 SW 1 ST WEST OF SW 8 AV, ONE-WAY EASTBD I 13588 98 FLAGLER ST WEST OF NW/SW 8 AV, ONE-WAY WESTBD 100 SE 1 ST WEST OF BISCAYNE BLVD, ONE-WAY EASTBD 916 100 FLAGLER ST WEST OF BISCAYNE BLVD, ONE-WAY =tiESTBD 991 4E662 102 NW 36 ST (SR 948) WEST OF NW 42 .AV 104 NE 79 ST ( SR 934 ) WEST OF NE 4 CT, ONE-WAY WESTBD 1?306 104 NE 82 ST ( SR 934) WEST OF NE 3 PL, ONE 230$9 107 NW 36 ST (SR 25} WEST OF NW 37 AV 25384 109 OKEECHOBEE RD (US 27 ) NORTHWEST OF NW 103 'ST 110 US 1 ( SOUTH DIXIE HWY) S OF JCT WITH PALMETTO EXPWY 3$954 HIALEAH) WEST OF LEJEUNE RD 35695 112 NW 103 ST (W 49 ST, 31592 118 TAMIAMI TRAIL ( SW 8 ST) EAST OF SW 57 AV 26569 121 NW 103 ST (SR 932) WEST OF NW 7 AV 24295 122 NW 119 ST (GRATIGNY DR) WEST OF NW 7 AV 27253 124 163 ST ( SR 826) WEST OF COLLINS AV, MIAMI BEACH 27186 NE 125 ST ( SR 922) EAST OF NE 6 AV 36'52 12;US 1 ( SOUTH DIXIE HWY} SOUTHWEST S SW 57 AV 27587 128 US 441 (NW 7 AV) NORTH OF NW 119 ST 7630 KROME AV ( SW 177 AV) SOUTH OF SW 328 ST 21057 132 96 ST ( SR 922 ) WEST OF HARDING AV, BAL HARBOUR 3i 100 135 NW 27 AV ( SR 9) NORTH OF NW 95 ST 16649 136 NW 138 ST ( SR 916) EAST OF NW 67 AV _,. 4 i i 3 i t t i t , a APPENDIX C 3 i HOTEL 310 Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: ROOMS On a: WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR OF ADJACENT STREET TRAFFIC, ONE HOUR BETWEEN 4 AND 6 P.M. TRIP GENERATION RATES Average Vehicle Trip Ends (Weekday—Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One H oour Between 4 and 6 P R .M.)per I Average Range of Standard Number of Average Number of Trip Rate Rates Deviation Studies ROOMS 7 243.9 0.664 0.310-1.026 DATA PLOT AND EQUATION , 500 450 j 0 400 z w a 350 w 300 U = 250 w F 200 w 150 Q it 100 0 0 so - 0 t00 200 300 400 500 X = NUMBER OF ROOMS Q ACTUAL DATA POINTS FITTED CURVE j Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 1.30 Ln(X) RZ = 0.838 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION: 54% enter,-46%exit. Trip Generation,September 1987/Institute of Transportation Engineers 468 TO 118 � 65-7 1 a t 2 -D All ZO —------------:-- 7