Loading...
5949 5961 SW 68 ST_GREEN MISC f 2011_17F�PLVER.SAL.CYCLE - LOCAL GOVERINTIMIENT VERIIFICAM ON OF S IA.US OF SITE a LAN APPROK-UL-FOR MULTIFAMILY DEVELOP3EENTS Name ol'Deveiopment• South Miami Gardens ffm IIEA.I.oftbe-201 I TJni%vr5al Cyclelpplicxion) See A 3C �tt _11ed Development Location: (Ata-miiimm povide-A-headdress assigned bydic United States Postal Service,xcludin-the addrewnurnbeT,sutetilanie--ed city,or if the address has not yet been assimed,prind&(J)the street nanic,closest designate&intersectio--and city if located aziry or(L)the street naunc,closest designated intersection and- counly ifi=red in the-unincorpomied area of the county.) TUM-18 Zoning Designation: Mjrk the applicable statement: 1. 0 The above-referenced Development is new construction or rehabilitation with new consti-action and the final site plan,in the zoning.designation stated above,.was approved on or before the Application Deadline for the 2011 Universal Application Cycle(as stated on the FHFC Website uLLp:/Iapps.floridahousing.org/StaiidAlonert,-HFC ECMI,'ConteiltPage.aspx9pAGE=0238)by action of the (Legally Authorized Body—)- 2. The above-referenced Development-is new construction or rehabili—tation with new construction and(i) this.jurisdiction provides either preliminary site plan approval-or conceptual site plan approval which has -been issued,or(ii)site plan approval is required for the new construction work--however,this Ja urisdicton provides neither preliminary site plan approval nor conceptual site plan approval,nor-is any other similar-process provided prior to issuing final site plan approval. Although there is no preliminary or conceptual site plan approval process and the ffmal site plan approval has not yet been issued,the site plan,in the zoning designation stated above,has been-reviewed. T"ne necessary approval lreview was performed on or before the Application Deadline for the-201 I Universal Application Cycle(as stated on the F.HFC Website I http://apps.floridaliousinz.or--JStandAl<)ne/',17 qC—EC�NVCoiltentPage.aspx?PAGE=O638)by --Plarinin-and Zoning (Legally:Authorized Body*) 3. 0 The above-referenced Development,in the zoning designation stated above,is rehabilitation without any new construction and does not require additional site plan approval or similar-process. '"Legally Authorized Body'is not an individual. Applicant mot state the-mine of the City Councit, County Commission,Board,Department-Division,etc., with authority over such matters. CURTIHCATION' I verb^i that the City/County of City of South Miami has vested in me the authority to verify status of site-plan approval (I%a=of City orCauuty) as sp .fied Bove and I ftirther.certify that the information-stated above is true and correct. / Chn Brimo.Planuling Director ahue LAI Printer Type Name and Title This certification rwjs*, be signed by the applicable City's or County's Director of Planning and Zoning,-chief appointed official (staff) responsible--for determination of issues related'to-sitee plan-approvaL.Cily Manager,or County-N4a=geVAdministrator,"Coordiimto.. Signatures frotxilocal elected officials are net acceptable,nor are other simatotics.If this certification is applicable to this Development and it is inappropriatelI y sign e d.:the Application will fail to meet _ threshold. If this certffication,contains corrections or,white-out"or if it is.scanned,ima d,aitered,or retyped,the form:v -not be considered and the ge Application-will&H to meet threshold. The certification may be photocopied. -Plovkle Behirid a Tab-Labeled"Exhi'vit 26" UAA 10 16(Rev. 2-11) !So-uth=Milamu-Gardens I iI i y Ad i p J ...t es� dress , - - 1 5961 SW 68-Street,South-Mlamf,FL �. ( 2 5949 SW 68 Street,-South-Miami,FL i i i s 9 Property Information Map Page 1 of 1 My Home Miami-Dade County, Florida MIAMFP:AD)E � Property Information Map � � gy Summary Details: I � +- Folio No.: 09 4025-063-0010 Property: 5949 SW 68 ST Mailing MIAMI-DADE COUNTY ..; Address: MIAMI-DADE HOUSING k a t AGENCY 51M fT?# TER % _ 1401 NW 7 ST MIAMI FL 33125-3601 40 Property Information: b r Primary Zone: 800 MULTI-FAMILY r � RESIDENTIAL CLUC: 047 DADE COUNTY �i'aysz i Beds/Baths: /5 Floors: j a Y Living Units: 6$1 S1 d"Sq Footage: 35,072 � Lot Size: .26 ACRES � � Year Built: 1975 4; 5 54 40 3.26 AC PB 102-19 UNIVERSITY Legal DNS SUB NO 3 TRACT Description: C'LOT SIZE 123554 SQ Assessment Information: �Ar- '"�r ear: 2011 2010 s > a Land Value: 1,124,700$1,124,700 Building Value: 1,481,383$1,499,442 Market Value: 2,606,083$2,624,142 Assessed Value: 2,606,083$2,624,142 Taxable Value Information: Aerial Photography-2009 0 152 ft ear: 2011 2010 This map was created on 11/17/2011 4:26:15 PM for reference purposes only. Applied . Applied Taxing Authority: Exemption/ Exemption/ Web Site©2002 Miami-Dade County.All rights reserved. Taxable Taxable Value: Value: Regional: $2,606,083/ $2,624,142/ $0 $0 County: $2.606,083/ $2,624,142/ $0 $0 City: $2,60 60,0831 $2,6$142/ School Board: $2,606,083/ $2,624,142/ $0 $0 http://gisims2.miamidade.gov/myhome/printmap.asp?mapurl=http://gisims2.miamidade.a... 11/17/2011 r'yr CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY given that the City.Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida will conduct Public Hearings at its regular City.Commission meeting scheduled for Tuesdav, November 16, 2010 beginning at 7:30 p.m.in the City Commission Chambers,6130 Sunset Drive,to consider the following item(s): An Ordinance of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami Florida, amending the Future Land Use Map of the South Miami Comprehensive Plan by changing the future land use map category from Multi-Family Residential (Four Story) to Low.Density Affordable Multiple-Family Residential (Two Story) for properties identified as the South Miami Gardens Apartments located at and specifically legally described as 5949 SW 68 Street (Folio No. 09- 4025-063--0010) and 5961 SW 68 Street (Folio No. 09-4025-063-0020); providing for severability;providing for ordinances in conflict;and providing an effective date. w SW 66TH TER 66699 ° t r SW 67TH ST r s �o ,Ks, ! SW 68TH ST 5940 S EJECT � m �jr- : Zn PROPERTIES � I 5656 ALL interested parties are invited to attend and will be heard. For further information,please contact the City Clerk's Office at:305-663-6340. Maria M.Menendez,CMC City Clerk Pursuant to Florida Statutes 286.0105,the City hereby advises the public that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by this Board, Agency or Commission with-respect to any matter considered at its meeting or hearing,he or she wi11 need a record of the proceedings,and that for such purpose, affected person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. SOUTH MIAMI GARDENS (IMPROVEMENT OPTIONS) South Miami Gardens Existing Conditions • Existing Site Area.. . .. . . .. ... . .. ...300,000 Square Feet • Existing Residential Units. . . ... ..58 Total Dwelling Units • Existing Zoning. . . . . . .. . . . . ... . .. ....RM-18 (18 Units Per Acre) • Existing Project Density... ... ... ..8 Units Per Acre 2001 Improvement Proposal(s) According to a 2001 study prepared by the Corridino Group dated December 2001 and entitled "A Vision: South Miami Community Redevelopment.Area Multi-Famil Housing Study" the following three (3) redevelopment proposals were identified for South Miami Gardens. [Option #1] "New Construction Utilizing Existing Zoning of 18 Units Per Acre" • Existing Site Area. . . . .. ... ... .. . ... ... .. . .300,000 Square Feet • Total Proposed Residential Units... ..126 Total Dwelling Units • Proposed Zoning... ... ... .. . . .. ... .........RM-18 (18 Units Per Acre) • Proposed Project Density... . . . .. . .... ..18 Units Per Acre [Option #2] "New Construction Utilizing Increased Zoning of 24 Units Per Acre" • Existing Site Area.. . .. . ... ... ... ... . .. ... .300,000 Square Feet • Total Proposed Residential Units... ..126 Total Dwelling Units • Proposed Zoning... ... ... ... . .. .. . .........RM-18 (18 Units Per Acre) • Proposed Project Density... ... . . . .. .. ..18 Units Per Acre [Option #?] "Rehabilitation of Existing Units and Complex" • Existing Site Area... .. . . .. . .. . .. ... .. . ... .300,000 Square Feet • Total Proposed Residential Units. .. ..58 Total Dwelling Units • Proposed Zoning... ... ... . . . ... ... .........RM-18 (18 Units Per Acre) • Proposed Project Density. . . .. . . .. .... ..8 Units Per Acre • Proposed Rehabilitation Items... ..central Air, Interior Renovation, Exterior Painting, Landscaping, Parking Lot Redesign, Security Access System, Appliances, Hurricane Impact Glass 2002 SoUrrey Results Following the 2001 study prepared by the Corridino Group a formal explanation of the proposals was provided by City of South Miami Consultant, Richard E. Miller. A subsequent survey was conducted of 41 of the total South Miami Gardens Households which at the time there were 43 Occupied Households. The following survey results were obtained: 78% of those Surveyed or 32 Total Households • Indicated that they favored the Multi-Family Redevelopment Plan 15% of those Surveyed or 6 Total Households • Indicated that they might support the Multi-Family Redevelopment Plan 7% of those Surveyed or 3 Total Households • Indicated that they did not support the Multi-Family Redevelopment Plan South Marni Gardens Sun--nary update June 9,2003 A Vision: South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency(SMCRA)Multi-Family Housing Study, completed in December 2001 identified the South Miami Gardens(SMG)Public Housing site as the number one ranked site for redevelopment The pr•mary purpose of the re- development plan is to develop a mixed-income housing development,which -incorporates public assisted units with market rate units of various housing types. The current development occupies approximately seven acres and contains fifty-eight housing units and a small school housing a head-start program at the north west comer of the site. The site is currently zoned RM-18 Multi-Family allowing for eighteen units per acre. The existing development has a density of approximately eight units per acre. The Miami.Dade Housing Agency owns and operates the South Miami Gardens. The location and the size of the property make this project an important catalyst for the growth and development of the SMCRA area. The study analyzed three different scenarios: Rehabilitation of existing buildings, a development of 18 units per acre and a development of 24 units per acre. The last two options include demolition of all the existing structures. The first option of Rehabilitation is not considered a viable option and will not be considered anyefurther.The other two options call for total demolition and redevelopment of the existing SMG facilities. At its meeting of May 12'2003, the SMCRA Board indicated its support of the option with 24 units per acre. This option will require the rezoning of existing zoning from RM-18 to RM-24. Further analysis would be i needed to develop a preliminary phased master plan with 24 units per acre, develop unit types, establish unit mix and study elevations. The Board directed staff to put together a Scope of Work for a consultant and a time line for this effort. The Board also indicated its support for re- establishing the street grid system as recommended by the Hometown Two plans. Demolition of the SMG would require the relocation of its residents. The Redevelopment Plan will provides the opportunity for the existing residents to move back to one of the newly developed units, if they so choose. Residents of SMG were surveyed to determine their level of support or opposition to the Redevelopment Plan. The survey was conducted between February and March 2002. SMG residents were provided a detailed explanation of the multifamily redevelopment plan and were given an opportunity to ask questions about the plan. The SMCRA Board has expressed a desire to keep the relocation at a minimum and to the extent possible limit relocation to the surrounding areas. A detailed relocation plan should be developed as the plan progresses. The phasing of the Redevelopment Plan will greatly influence the relocation plan and vice versa As of March 18,2002 the SMG development had 43 of its 58 units occupied by residents. Two of the 58 units are out of management for use by the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Center and the Police Workstation. Of the 43 occupied units, (100%) of the households were issued surveys. There were 41 or(95%)head of households that completed the survey.. There were 5% or two households that did not return the survey. Of the 41 head of households completing the survey, 32 or(78%) support the multifamily redevelopment plan(including the relocation implications). South Ntami Gardens Summary update June 09,2003 I Page 2 of 2 i Six households or(15%)responded that maybe they support&,..-plan. The remaining three households or(7°%)did not support the redevelopment plan. Project is anticipated to be privately funded. The subsidy needed for the public assisted portion of the housing will be derived through the revenue generated through the market rate-housing component. Request for Proposal would be sent out for interested developers for a turn key project to design,build and manage the new development. Based on currently available information, a number of very preliminary economic pro-forma have been prepared for the redevelopment. . I 2011 i ,rI3SAL C°3 CLE - LOCAL:GO"v�R it v:i°� I;ICATIO\T;? T D-EN'ELOPiv ENT IS CONSIS EN T IAITIH ZO\UqGAIND LAND USE p`GLT,rATIONS Nance of.Development: south Miami Gardens Tar'i ELL 1.of-the 2011 Universal Cycle Application) See Attached Development Location: (Ara minim)im proiiae the address assimed by the United States Postal Sernce,including the addres number,street:rame and city,or.i the ad uess has not yet been assigned,provide.6)the street name,closest designated intersection and city-if located within a city or(ii)the-sheet name,closest desi„Fm+ated-inte section and county if.11ocated-in-the unincorporated area of the county.) The-undersigued Local C-overllment official.conf=that on or before the Application Deadline for the. 20111 Universal Application Cycle(as stated on the FHFC Website http:/,(apps.l?orldaho�ising.org/StandAIc)ne!FN-TC ECM/vonfentPage.aspx"PAGE=0238): (1) The number of units(not buildings)allowed for this development site(if restricted)is: 80 and/or if a PUD,the/number of units(not buildings)allowed.per development site.is: or _ if not a PUD and development site is subject to-existing special use or similar permit,number of unts allowed for this development site is: :and (1) The zoning.designation for the retie tensed Development site is - 18 ;.-and (3) The intended use is consistent with current land use regulations and the referenced zoning designation or, if the Development consists of rehabilitation,the intended use.is.allowed as a legally non-conforming use. To the best of -my knowledge, there are no additional land use regulation hearings or approvals required to obtain.the zoning, classification or density described herein. Assuming compliance with the applicable land use re gulations,there are no ltnow•n conditions which would preclude_construction or rehabilitation(as the case m_ny be) of the referenced Development on the proposed site. CERTIFICATION I certify that the City/County of City of South Miami has vested in me the authority (Name ofCity.,County) to verify consistency with local land use regulations and the zoning designation specified above or, if the Development consists of rehabi tation,the intended use is allotived as a"legally non-conforring use"and I farther certify that the foregoing information is true and correct. In addition,if the proposed Development site is in the Florida Keys Area-as defined in Rule Chapters 67-21 and,67-48,F.A.C.,I farther certify that the Applicant has obtained the necessary Rate of Growth Ordinance (ROB TwIloea—tio-its,from l.goal Government. Christopher Brimo Stature P.4.,+or Type Nance Planning-Director Pry .or Type Title This certification must-be signed by the applicable City's or Co�unn `s Dfiractor of-Planning and Zoning, chief appointed official(staff) responsible for determination of issues related comprehensive planning and zoning, City Manager, or County Manager/Admirustmtor,'Coordinator. Signarures firm local elected-officials are not acceptabie nor are other signatories. If ue certification is applicable to this Development and it is inappropriately signed,the Application will fail to meet threshold. if this certification contaias corrections.or`white-out',or if it is scanned,imaged,altered,or retyped,the form will not be considered and the Application will fail to meet threshold. The certification-ma,be photocopied. Provide Behind a Tab Label-d`Exhibit 32" UA101 6.(Rev. 2-11) 6-43.004(1)(a);67-21.093(1)(a),E 4C. - Property Information Map Page 1 of 1 My Home Miami-Dade County, Florida IAMI.OADE Property Information Map gym, 1011� ktAi��° ��. ,� �"` - Summary Details: � t Folio No.: 09-4025-063-0020 t * "fit n' Property: 5961 SW 68 ST Mailing MIAMI-DADE COUNTY v6= w a , m StN 66TH 57 �t '' »fir 9 ddress: MIAMI-DADE HOUSING - _ 1401 NW 7 ST MIAMI FL 33125-3601 . Property Information: 800 MULTI-FAMILY <, 4 S3�Tt.sr ,� •e- Primary Zone: ESIDENTIAL CLUC: 047 DADE COUNTY Beds/Baths: 10/6 Floors: 1 Livin Units: } -x a ,�t <� 3u,A ;r x d-Sq Foota e: 935 Lot Size: .33 ACRES _ r�� �` � �� � � s1•J sari g1'i.,�s. SYt,tiBT}t 5f „ -! s Year Built: 1956 5 54 40 3.33 AC PB S � re �� �t Le al 102-19 UNIVERSITY Description: DNS SUB NO 3 TRACT < D'LOT SIZ2.126207 SQ R SWIM Assessment Information: ear: 2011 2010 Land Value: $1,914,750$1,914,750 Building Value: $2,300,000$2,300,000 Market Value: $4,214,75 0 4,214 750 Assessed Value: $4,214,750$4,214,750 Taxable Value Information: Aerial Photography-2009 0 152 ft ear: 2011 2010 This map was created on 11/17/2011 4:25:25 PM for reference purposes only. Applied Applied Taxing Authority: Exemption/ Exemption/ Web Site©2002 Miami-Dade County.All rights reserved. Taxable -Taxable Value: Value: Regional: $4,214,750/ $4,214,750/ _ $0 $0 $4,214,750/ $4,214,750/ County: $0 $0 City: $4,214,750/ $4,214,750/ $0 $0 . : c School Board: $4,214,750/ $4,214,750/ $0 $0 http://gisims2.miamidade.gov/myhome/printmap.asp?mapurl=http://C'isims2.miamidade.g... 11/17/2011 1 I / ,gft CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY given that the City,Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida will conduct Public Hearings at its regular City.Commission meeting scheduled for Tuesday, November 16, 2010 beginning at 7:30 . p.m.in the City Commission Chambers,6130 Sunset Drive,to consider the following item(s): An Ordinance of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami Florida, amending the Future Land Use Map of the South Miami Comprehensive Plan by changing the future land use map category.from Multi-Family Residential (Four Story) to Low.Density Affordable Multiple-Family Residential (Two Story) for properties identified as the South Miami Gardens Apartments located at and specifically legally described as 5949 SW 68 Street (Folio No. 09- 4025-063-=0010) and 5961 SW 68 Street (Folio .No. 09-4025-063-0020); providing for severability;providing for ordinances in conflict;and providing an effective date. SW 66TH TER � 3 Is tests] it�7 Kj 1Z� t�tl i�t7 - - �� S W 67TH ST . E 3s d JSW 68TH ST r-940 SUBJECT PROPERTIES S658 1 i 6311 ALL interested parties are invited to attend and will be heard. For further information,please contact.the City Clerk's Office at:305-663-6340. Maria-M.Menendez,CMC . City Clerk Pursuant to Florida Statutes 286.0105,the City hereby advises the public that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by this Board, Agency or Commission with.respect to any matter considered at its meeting or hearing,he or she will need a record of the proceedings,.and that for such purpose, affected person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. SOUTH MIAMI GARDENS (IMPROVEMENT OPTIONS) 1 South Miami Gardens Existing Conditions • Existing Site Area... ... ... .. . ... ...300,000 Square Feet • Existing Residential Units... . .. ..58 Total Dwelling Units • Existing Zoning... . . . ... ... ... . . . ....RM-18 (18 Units Per Acre) • Existing Project Density... . .. .. . ..8 Units Per Acre 2001 Improvement Proposal(s) According to a 200' study prepared by the Corridino Group dated December 2001 and entitled `A Vision: South Miami Community Redevelopment Area Multi-Famil Housing Study'; the following three (3) redevelopment proposals were identified for South Miami Gardens: [Option #1] "New Construction Utilizing Existing Zoning of 18 Units Per Acre" • Existing Site Area... ... ... . .. . .. . .. ... ... .300,000 Square Feet • Total Proposed Residential Units... ..126 Total Dwelling Units • Proposed Zoning.. . . . . ... ... . .. ... .........RIVI-18 (18 Units Per Acre) • Proposed Project Density.. . . .. ... .... ..18 Units Per Acre [Option #2] "New Construction Utilizing Increased Zoning of 24 Units Per Acre" • Existing Site Area. .. ... ... ... ... ... . . . ... .300,000 Square Feet • Total Proposed Residential Units... ..126 Total Dwelling Units • Proposed Zoning.. . ... ... .. . ... . . . .........RM-18 (18 Units Per Acre) • Proposed Project Density.. . ... . . . .... ..18 Units Per Acre [Option #3] "Rehabilitation of Existing Units and Complex" • Existing Site Area.. . ... ... ... . . . .. . .. . ... .300,000 Square Feet • Total Proposed Residential Units... ..58 T otal Dwelling Units • Proposed Zoning. .. .. . . .. ... ... .. . .........RM-18 (18 Units Per Acre) • Proposed Project Density.. . ... ... ... . ..8 Units Per Acre • Proposed Rehabilitation Items... ..Central Air, Interior Renovation, Exterior Painting, Landscaping, Parking Lot Redesign, Security Access System, Appliances, Hurricane Impact Glass 20 02 Survey Results Following the 2001 study prepared by the Corridino Group a formal explanation of the proposals was provided by City of South Miami Consultant, Richard E. Miller. A subsequent survey was conducted of 41 of the total South Miami Gardens Households which at the time there were 43 Occupied Households. The following survey results were obtained. 78% of those Surveyed or 32 Total Households Indicated that they favored the Multi-Family Redevelopment Plan 15% of those Surveyed or 6 Total Households • Indicated that they might support the.Multi-Family Redevelopment Plan 7% of those Surveyed or 3 Total Households • Indicated that they did not support the Multi-Family Redevelopment Plan r , South Miami Gardens Sum.*:ary update June 9,2003 A Vision: South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency(SMCRA)Multi-Family Housing Study, completed in December 2001 identified the South Miami Gardens(SMG)Public Housing site as the number one ranked site for redevelopment: The primary purpose of the re- development plan is to develop a mixed income housing development,which incorporates public assisted units with market rate units of various housing types. The current development occupies approximately seven acres and contains fifty-eight housing units and a small school housing a head-start program at the north west comer of the site. The site is currently zoned RM-18 Multi-Family allowing for eighteen units per acre. The existing development has a density of approximately eight units per acre. The Miami Dade Housing Agency owns and operates the South Miami Gardens. The location and the size of the property make this project an important catalyst for the growth and development of the SMCRA area. The study analyzed three different scenarios:Rehabilitation of existing buildings, a development of 18 units per acre and a development of 24 units per acre. The last two options include demolition of all the existing structures. The first option of Rehabilitation is not considered a viable option and will not be considered any.further.The other two options call for total demolition and redevelopment,of the existing SMG facilities. At its meeting of May 12'2003, the SMCRA Board indicated its support of the option with 24 units per acre. This option will require the rezoning of existing zoning from RM-18 to RM-24. Further analysis would be needed to develop a preliminary phased master plan with 24 units per acre, develop unit types, establish unit mix and study elevations. The Board directed staff to put together a Scope of Work for a consultant and a time line for this effort. The Board also indicated its support for re- establishing the st{eet grid system as recommended by the Hometown Two plans. Demolition of the SMG would require the relocation of its residents. The Redevelopment Plan will provides the opportunity for the existing residents to move back to one of the newly developed units, if they so choose. Residents of SMG were surveyed to determine their level of support or opposition to the Redevelopment Plan. The survey was conducted between February and March 2002. SMG residents were provided a detailed explanation of the multifamily redevelopment plan and were given an opportunity to ask questions about the plan. The SMCRA Board has expressed a desire to keep the relocation at a minimum and to the extent possible limit relocation to the surrounding areas. A detailed relocation plan should be developed as the plan progresses. The phasing of the Redevelopment Plan will greatly influence the relocation plan and vice versa As of March 18, 2002 the SMG development had 43 of its 58 units occupied by residents. Two of the 58 units are out of management for use by the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Center and-.he Police Workstation. Of the 43 occupied units, (100°/x) of the households were issued surveys. There were 41 or(95%)head of households that completed the survey.. There were 5% or two households that did not return the survey. Of the 41 head of households completing the survey, 32 or(78%) support the multifamily redevelopment plan(including the relocation implications). South Miami Gardens Summary update June 09,2003 I Page 2 of 2 Six households or(15%)responded that maybe they support the plan. The remaining three households or(7°.Io)did not support the redevelopment plan. Project is anticipated to be privately funded. The subsidy needed for the public assisted portion of the housing will be derived through the revenue generated through the market rate-housing component. Request for Proposal would be sent out for interested developers for a turn key project to design,build and manage the new development. Based on currently available information, a number of very preliminary economic pro-forma have been prepared for the redevelopment. 2011 CYCLE _ "VERIFICATION.01 AVAILABILI—1i OF -FR—AS TME3(_`T URE--R. GADS Name of Development: South IT±au.i Gardens (Pa*t 111-k 1.of the 201 i Universal Cycle Applications See Attached Development Location: (.fit a,mini m m prmdde the address assipe3 by the United States Postal Service,includiprthe address number,street name and city,or if tae a 3 ess has-not yet beer.assigned,pronde(i)the street name,closest designated intersection and city-if located within a city or(iij the gmTt name,closest_3esi®ated intersection and county if located in the unincorporated area of the county.) The undersigned local goverment representative confil-FUS that on or before the Application-Deadline for the 2011 Universal Application Cycle(as stated on the FIIFC CJebsite liu :l/apps.florida'Aotising.orz/StandA_]one/FITrC ECNPContent_-Pa,P asnx?PACE=0238): 1. Existing paved loads provide access to the proposed Development or paved roads will be .constructed as part of the proposed Development. 2. There are no impediments to the proposed-De"lopment using tile-roads other than payment of impact fees or-providing curb cuts, htrn lanes, signalization- or sect g-required final approvals and permits for the proposed Development. 3. The execution of this verification is not a granting of traffic conceurency approval for dale proposed Development. -4. To the best of our:knowledge, there are no moratoriums pertaining to road usage -.which are applicable to the proposed Development. CER T MC ATIO I certify lLe foregoing-information is true and correct. d94 l City of South A`riami Signnaat ur Name of Local C-ovenment ekw Srnqo 1 —6<1 ao 4',95 SW 75th Avenue Print or Type Name Address(street address, city,state) '1Ar'Q w q 1 h6__;z)k Miami.FL 33155 Print or Type Title 305-103-2063 Telephone Number(including area code) This certification,may not be signed by the Applicant,by any related parties of the Applicant,or by any Principals or-Financial Beneficiaries of the Applicant._in addition,signatures from local elected officials are not-acceptable. If the certification is applicable to-this-Development and it is inappropriately signed,the Application will fail threshold. If this certification contains corrections or'-white-out',or if ii is scanned.imaged,altered,or retyped,the form-will not be considereian3the Application will fail to meet threshold. The certification maybe photocopied. 'Provide Behind a Tab Labeled"Exhibit 31" UA1016(Rev. 2-11) 67.49.004(1)(a);6-21003(1)(a),F Ac. ,rroperry lnrormation Map Page 1 of 1 My Home Miami-Dade County, Florida �. MIAMIDDADE Property Information Map Summary Details: Folio No.: 09-4025-063-0010 �W 65YH "--• Property: 5949 SW 68 ST pj Mailing MIAMI-DADE COUNTY w Address: MIAMI-DADE HOUSING AGENCY 6874i'YE1�' 1401 NW 7 ST MIAMI FL #" 1 133125-3601 Property Information: Primary Zone: 800 MULTI-FAMILY ESIDENTIAL CLUC: 047 DADE COUNTY ., � Beds/Baths: /5 Floors: rte mow, Living Units: d'S Foota e: 5,072 7C� Lot Size: .26 ACRES r" u Year Built: 1975 5 54 40 3.26 AC PB Legal 102-19 UNIVERSITY Description: DNS SUB NO 3 TRACT C'LOT SIZE 123554 SQ T e�1•�sr � . ��, A �k�. Assessment Information: 2011 2010 �� Land Value: 1,124,700 1,124,700 Buildin Value: 1,481,38 1,499,442 Market Value: 2,606,083 2,624,142 ssessedValue: 2,606,083 2,624,142 Taxable Value Information: Aerial Photography-2009 0 152 ft ear: 2011 2010 This map was created on 11/17/20114:26:15 PM for reference purposes only. Applied Applied : Exemption/it th A Taxing Authority-Web Site©2002 Miami-Dade County.All rights reserved. ax Taxable Ta xable Exemption/ Value: Value: Regional: $2,606,083/ $2,624,142/ - $0 $0 County: $2.606,083/ $2,624,142/ $0 $0 City: $2,606,083/ $2,624,142/ $0 $0 School Board: $2,606,083/ $2,624,142/ $0 1 $0 http://gisims2.miamidade.gov/myhome/printmap.asp?mapurl=http://gisims2.miamidade.Q... 11/17/2011 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY given that the City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida will conduct Public Hearings at its regular City.Commission meeting scheduled for Tuesday, November 16, 2010 beginning at 7:30 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers,6130 Sunset Drive,to consider the following item(s): An Ordinance of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami Florida, amending the Future Land Use Map of the South Miami Comprehensive Plan by changing the future land use map category from Multi-Family. Residential (Four Story) to Low.Density. Affordable Multiple-Family Residential (Two Story) for properties identified as the South Miami Gardens . Apartments located at and specifically legally described as 5949 SST 68_Street (Folio No. 09- 4025-063--0010) and 5961 SW 68 Street (Folio No. 09-4025-063-0020); providing for severability;providing for ordinances in conflict,and providing an effective date. SW WITH TER - 6E69 SW 67TH ST i tea-. SW 68TH ST SUBJECT PROPERTIES. ALL interested parties are invited to attend and will be heard. For further information,please contact the City Clerk's Office at:305-663-6340. Maria.M.Menendez,CMC . City Clerk Pursuant to Florida Statutes 286.0105, the City hereby advises the public that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by this Board, Agency or Commission with-respect to any matter considered at its meeting or hearing,he or she will need a record of the proceedings,and that for such purpose, affected person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. SOUTH MIAMI GARDENS. (IMPROVEMENT OPTIONS) South Miami' Gardens Existing Conditions • Existing Site Area.. . .. . . .. ... ... ...300,000 Square Feet • Existing Residential Units.. . ... ..58 Total Dwelling Units • Existing ?oning... . . . .. . ... ... ... ....RM-18 (18 Units Per Acre) • Existing Project Density... ... .. . ..8 Units Per Acre 2001 Improvement Proposal(s) According to a 2001 study prepared by the Corridino Group dated December 2001 and entitled "A Vision: South Miami Community Redevelopment Area Multi-Famil Housing Study" the following three (3) redevelopment proposals were identified for South Miami Gardens: [Option #1] "New Construction Utilizing Existing Zoning of 18 Units Per Acre" • Existing Site Area. .. . .. . .. ... ... . . . ... ... .300,000 Square Feet • Total Proposed Residential Units... ..126 Total Dwelling Units • Proposed Zoning.. . .. . . . . ... . .. .. . .........RM-18 (18 Units Per Acre) • Proposed Project Density... ... .. . .... ..18 Units Per Acre [Option #2] "New Construction Utilizing increased Zoning of 24 Units Per Acre" • Existing Site Area.. . . . . ... ... . . . .. . . .. ... .300,000 Square Feet • Total Proposed Residential Units... ..126 Total Dwelling Units • Proposed Zoning... ... ... .. . ... ... .........RM-18 (18 Units Per Acre) • Proposed Project Density 18 Units Per Acre [Option #3]. "Rehabilitation of Existing Units and Complex" • Existing Site Area. .. . .. . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . ... .300,000 Square Feet' • Total Proposed Residential Units... ..58 Total Dwelling Units • Proposed Zoning. .. ... ... . . . ... .. . .........RM-18 (18 Units Per Acre) • Proposed Project Density 8 Units Per Acre • Proposed Rehabilitation . Items... ..central Air, Interior Renovation, Exterior Painting, Landscaping, Parking Lot Redesign, Security Access System, Appliances, Hurricane Impact Glass 2002 Survey Results Following the 2001 study prepared by the Corridino Group a formal explanation of the proposals was provided by City of South Miami Consultant, Richard E. Miller. A subsequent survey was conducted of 41 of the total South ,Miami Gardens Households which at the time there were 43 Occupied Households. The following survey results were obtained. 76% of those Surveyed or 32 Total Households • Indicated that they favored the Multi-Family Redevelopment Plan 15% of those Surveyed or 6 Total Households Indicated that they might support the Multi-Family Redevelopment Plan 7% of those Surveyed or 3 Total Households • Indicated that they did not support the Multi-Family Redevelopment Plan y South Nhami Ga/rdens I Summary update Jane 9, 2003 A Vision: South.Miami Community Redevelopment Agency(SIPS'RA)Multi-Family Housing Study, completed in December 2001 identified the South Mia; Gardens(SMG)Public Housing site as the number one ranked site for redevelopment: The primary purpose of the re- v development plan is to develop a mixed income housing development,which incorporates public assisted units with market rate units of various housing types. i The current development occupies approximately seven acres and contains fifty-eight housing units and a small school housing a head-start program at the north west comer of the site. The site is currently zoned RM-18 Multi-Family allowing for eighteen units per acre. The existing development has a density of approximately eight units per acre. The Miami Dade Housing Agency owns and operates the South Miami Gardens. The location and the size of the property make this project an important catalyst for the growth and development of the SMCRA_area. The study analyzed three different scenarios:Rehabilitation of existing buildings, a development of 18 units per acre and a development of 24 units per acre. The last two options include demolition of all the existing structures. The first option of Rehabilitation is not considered a viable option and will not be considered any further.The other two options call for total demolition and redevelopment of the existing SMG facilities. At its meeting of May 12°2003, the SMCRA Board indicated its support of the option with 24 units per acre. This option will require the rezoning of existing zoning from RM-18 to RM-24. Further analysis would be needed to develop a preliminary phased master plan with 24 units per acre, develop unit types, establish unit mix and study elevations. The Board directed staff to put together a Scope of Work for a consultant and a time line for this effort. The Board also indicated its support for re- establishing the street grid system as recommended by the Hometown Two plans. Demolition of the SMG would require the relocation of its residents. The Redevelopment Plan will provides the opportunity for the existing residents to move back to one of the newly developed units, if they so choose. Residents of SMG were surveyed to determine their level of support or opposition to the Redevelopment Plan. The survey was conducted between February and March 2002. SMG residents were provided a detailed explanation of the multifamily redevelopment plan and were given an opportunity to ask questions about the plan. The SMCRA f Board has expressed a desire to keep the relocation at a minimum and to the extent possible limit relocation to the surrounding areas. A detailed relocation plan should be developed as the plan progresses. The phasing of the Redevelopment Plan will greatly hu uence the relocation plan and vice versa_ As of March 18,2002 the SMG development had 43 of its 58 units occupied by residents. Two of the 58 units are out of management for use by the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Center and the Police Workstation. Of the 43 occupied units, (100%) of the households were issued surveys. i There were 41 or(95%)head of households that completed the survey. There were 5% or two households that did not return the survey. Of the 41 head of households completing the survey, 32 or(78%) support the multifamily redevelopment plan(including the relocation implications). South i,uami Gardens Summary update 3une 09, 2003 ! Page 2 of 2 i Six households or(15%)responded that maybe they support the plan. The remaining three households or(793/0)did not support the redevelopment plan. Project is anticipated to be privately funded. The subsidy needed for the public assisted portion of the housing will be derived through the revenue generated through the market rate-housing component. Request for Proposal would be sent out for interested developers for a turnkey project to design, build and manage the new development. Based on currently available information, a number of very preliminary economic pro-forma,have been prepared for the redevelopment. z 1 I 2011�y 9 EI S AT CYCLE - LOCAL OO b E RN`TENT'{ERI7F CATION OF AFFORDABLE ROUSING INCENTIVES MODI.ICAVI kO N OF FEE REQ—TUVI'ENTS F OR AFFORDABLE HOuSLNG PROPERTIES OR DEVEI.OWNr�'NTS Na�mi.e of Development: South Miami_Gardens -(P<.:._A.1.oftk 2^11 TJnhrersal Cycle Application) - See Attached Development Location: (At a zriW—Tn provide the address assiped by the united States Postal Semce,including the address number,street name and city,or if tte addrss.has not yet been assigned,provide(i)the street names,closest+.-sipated intersection'and city if located cuithin a city or(ii)the street name,closest desieuated-intersection and- couury if located in the- uncorporated area of the county.) Name of City or County Government:city-of=South Miami The referenced Local Government cu rentlymakes available to affordable housing properties or developments the.modification of fee requirements,including a reduction or waiver of fees and-alternative methods of fee payment. CERTIFICATION A a t the above information is true and correct. Print-or Type Name Print or Type I ltte This certification must be signed by the chief-appointed official (staff) responsible for issues related to this incentive, Mayor, City Manager. County Manager/Administrator/Coordin<wor, or Chaim,erson of tI;e City Council/Commission or Chairperson of the Board of County Commissioners. Other signatories are not acceptable. Zero points will be awarded. Signatory must be a representative of the.local government that has enacted the incentive. For purposes.of this form only, if a Development is located within a municipality but the incentive is not available in the city, Applicant may use county incentive. For example, if a Development is located in a town«1Lich does not home impact fee requirements but the county has such requirements and they have a reduction or waiver of these fees for affordable-housing,the Applicant may submit a properly executed Local Government Verification of Affordable Housing Incentives Form-from the county. T'lle Applicant will not receive credit for this incentive if the.certification contains corrections or`white out' or if the certification is scanned,imaged,altered,or retyped. e certificatiorimay e photocopied. Provide Behind a Tab Labeled`Exhibit 42" t.JP�o16(Rev. 2-11) 67-48.04(1)(a);67?1.Q43(lxa),FAC. J,ropeny intormation Map Page 1 of 1 My Home Miami-Dade.County, Florida _ MIAMI CADE Property Information Map Summary Details: Folio No.: 09-4025-063-0010 S1Af ATM$t` �'� cf Property: 5949 SW 68 ST a ; Mailing MIAMI-DADE COUNTY Address: MIAMI-DADE HOUSING AGENCY 53Af"88111v� 1401 NW 7 ST MIAMI FL , 1 133125-3601 gW 81•`fM S1'r:? • Property Information: { a 800 MULTI-FAMILY Primary Zone: ESIDENTIAL LUC: 047 DADE COUNTY s w Beds/Baths: /5 Floors: Living Units: 51N6gtlf ST ' 5,072 2g. Lot Size: .26 ACRES w'. Year Built: 1975 ° s ' 5 54 40 3.26 AC PB 102-19 UNIVERSITY r t* Legal Description: DNS SUB NO 3 TRACT • � C'LOT SIZE 123554 SQ T Assessment Information: Year 2011 2010 � e Land Value: 1,124,700 1,124,700 -+r ' Building Value: 1,481,383 1,499,442 eF�� � , �„ R ,� -• ,� w Market Value: 2,606,083 2,624,142 - �' QTN Sl ,• � Assessed Value: 2,606,083 2,624,142 Taxable Value Information: Aerial Photography-2009 0 152 ft ear: 2011 2010 This map was created on 11/17/20114:26:15 PM for reference purposes only. Applied Applied Taxing Authority: Exemption/ Exemption/ Web Site©2002 Miami-Dade County.All rights reserved. Taxable Taxable Value: Value: Regional: $2,606,083/ $2,624,142/ $0 $0 County: $2,606,0831 $2,624,142/ $0 $0 City: $2,606,083/ $2,624,142/ � - $0 $0 School Board: $2,606,083/ $2,624,142/ $0 $0 http://gisims2.miamidade.gov/myhome/printmap.asp?mapurl=http://gisims2.miamidade.g... 11/17/2011 1 y7- CITY OF SOUTH MIt1MI NOTICE, OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY given that the City,Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida will conduct Public Hearings at its regular City.Commission meeting scheduled for Tuesday. November 16, 2010 beginning at 7:30 p.m.in the City Commission Chambers,6130 Sunset Drive,to consider the following item(s):" An Ordinance of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami Florida, amending- the Future Land Use Map of the South Miami Comprehensive Plan by changing the future land use map category from Multi-Family. Residential (Four Story) to Low.Density Affordable Multiple-Family Residential (Two Story) for properties identified as the South Miami Gardens . " Apartments located at and specifically legally described as 5949 SW 68 Street (Folio No. 09= 4025-063--0010) and. 5961 SW 68 Street (Folio No. 09-4025-063-0020); providing for severability;providing for ordinances in conflict;and providing an effective date. N � SW 66TH TER 6669 n {� 'am .r SW 67TH ST CL co SIN 68TH ST SUBJECT m � � u'• u7 a .� z� a PROPERTIES Sail 3 ALL interested parties are invited to attend and will be heard. For further information,please contact the City Clerk's Office at:305-663-6340. Maria M.Menendez,CMC . City Clerk Pursuant to Florida Statutes 286.0105,the City hereby advises the public that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by this Board, Agency or Commission with.respect to any matter considered at its meeting or hearing,he or she will need a record of the proceedings,and that for such purpose, affected person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. SOUTH MIAMI GARDENS (IMPROVEMENT OPTIONS) r. South Miami Gardens - Eoxisting Conditions • Existing Site Area... ... . .. . .. ... ...300,000 Square Feet • Existing Residential Units... ... ..58 Total Dwelling Units • Existing Zoning. 8 (18 Units Per Acre) • Existing Project Density. .. . .. ... ..8 Units Per Acre 2001 Improvement Proposal(s) According to a 2001 study prepared by the Corridino Group dated December 2001 and entitled "A Vision: South Mliami Community Redevelopment Area Multi-Famil Housing Study'; the following three (3) redevelopment proposals were identified for South Miami Gardens: [Option #1] "New Construction Utilizing Existing Zoning of 18 Units Per Acre" • Existing Site Area.. . ... . .. . . . .. . . . . ... . . . .300,000 Square Feet • Total Proposed Residential Units... ..126 Total Dwelling Units • Proposed Zoning... . .. .. . ... ... .. . .........RM-18 (18 Units Per Acre) • Proposed Project Density.. . . . . . .. .... ..18 Units Per Acre [Option #2] "New Construction Utilizing Increased Zoning of 24 Units Per Acre" • Existing Site Area.. . ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .300,000 Square Feet • Total Proposed Residential Units. .. ..126 Total Dwelling Units • Proposed Zoning... ... ... ... ... ... .........RM-18 (18 Units Per Acre) • Proposed Project Density... . .. ... .. . . ..18 Units Per Acre [Option #3] "Rehabilitation of Existing Units and Complex" • Existing Site Area... .. . ... . . . . .. . . . ... .. . .300,000 Square Feet • Total Proposed Residential Units.. . ..58 Total Dwelling Units • Proposed Zoning. .. .. . ... ... ... ... .........RM-18 (18 Units Per Acre) • Proposed Project Density... ... . .. .. . . ..8 Units Per Acre • Proposed Rehabilitation Items... ..Central Air, Interior Renovation, Exterior Painting, Landscaping, Parking Lot Redesign, Security Access System, Appliances, Hurricane Impact Glass 2002 Survey Results Following the 2001 study prepared by the Corridino Group a f6m7al explanation of the proposals was provided by City of South Miami Consultant, Richard E. Miller. A subsequent survey was conducted of 41 of the total South Miami Gardens Households which at the time there were 43 Occupied Households. The following survey results were obtained: 76% of those Surveyed or 32 Total Households • Indicated that they favored the Multi-Family Redevelopment Plan 15% of those Surveyed or 6 Total Households • Indicated that they might support the Multi-Family Redevelopment Plan 7% of those Surveyed or 3-Total Households • Indicated that they did not support the Multi-Family Redevelopment Plan F South.Nfami Gardens i Summary update June 9, 2003 A Vision: South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency(SMCRA)Multi-Family Housing Study, completed in December 2001 identified the South Miami Gardens(SMG)Public Housing site as the number ore ranked site for redevelopment:xe The primary purpose of the re- development plan is to develop a n d-income housing development,which incorporates public assisted units with market rate units of various housing types. The current development occupies approximately seven acres and contains fifty-eight housing units and a small school housing a head-start program at the north west corner of the site. The site is currently zoned RM-18 Multi-Family allowing for eighteen units per acre. The existing development has a density of approximately eight units per acre. The Miami Dade Housing Agency owns and operates the South Miami Gardens. The location and the size of the property make this project an important catalyst for the growth and development of the SMCRA area. T'ne study analyzed three different scenarios: Rehabilitation of existing buildings, a development of 18 units per acre and a development of 24 units per acre. The last two options include demolition of all the existing structures. The first option of Rehabilitation is not considered a viable option and will not be considered any further. The other two options call for total demolition and redevelopment of the existing SMG facilities. At its meeting of May 12'2003, the SMCRA Board indicated its support of the option with 24 units per acre. This option will require the rezoning of existing zoning from RM-18 to RiM-24. Further analysis would be needed to develop a preliminary phased master plan with 24 units per acre, develop unit types, establish unit mix and study elevations. The Board directed staff to put together a Scope of Work for a consultant and a time line for this effort. The Board also indicated its support for re- establishing the street grid system as recommended by the Hometown Two plans. Demolition of the SMG would require the relocation of its residents. The Redevelopment Plan will provides the opportunity for the existing residents to move back to one of the newly developed units, if they so choose. Residents of SMG were surveyed to determine their level of support or opposition to the Redevelopment Plan. The survey was conducted between February and March 2002. SMG residents were provided a detailed explanation of the multifamily redevelopment plan and were given an opportunity to ask questions about the plan. The SMCRA Board has expressed a desire to keep the relocation at a minimum and to the extent possible limit relocation to the surrounding areas. A detailed relocation plan should be developed as the plan progresses. The phasing of the Redevelopment Plan will greatly influence the relocation plan and vice versa As of March 18,2002 the SMG development had 43 of its 58 units occupied by residents. Two of the 58 units are out of management for use by the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Center and the Police Workstation. Of the 43 occupied units, (100°/a) of the households were issued surveys. i There were 41 or(95%)head of households that completed the survey.. There were 5% or two households that did not return the survey. Of the 41 head of households completing the survey, 32 or(78%) support the multifamily redevelopment plan(including the relocation implications). South,Miami Gardens Summary update June 07,2003 I Page 2 oft Six households or(15%) that maybe they support the plan. The remaining three households or(7°,"0)did not support the redevelopment plan. Project is anticipated to be privately funded. The subsidy needed for the pubic assisted portion of the housing will be derived through the revenue generated through the market rate-housing component. Request for Proposal would be sent out for interested developers for a turn key project to design, build and manage the new development. Based on currently available information, a number of very preliminary economic pro-forma have been prepared for the redevelopment. I 1 201-1-UNUIVERSA-1-CYCLE - LOC-AL GOVERNTH INT VEIRTI IC ATI O v; AFFOR3 LE H"UTS G_NCENTI TS CON-T RIB1,1 TI:ONS TO-AFFORDABLE IIOITSING�ROPFf2€�S – OR DF VEEL0P EI T00 :Name of Development: South Nliami Gardens (P.^: M_jl1.of the 201.1 Unix ersal Cycle Application) See Attached Develoment Location: (At a m;n; , provide the address assign+by the unified States Postal Serene,including the address number,streetmme and city,or if the address has not yet been assigned,provide(i)the streetname,closest designated intersection and city if located within a city or(ii)the street name,closest designated intersection-and minty if located in theunincorpocated aria ofthe county.) Name of City or County Government city of south Miami The referenced Local Government leas-an on-going and current process for providing contributions to affordable housing properties or.developmenrs_ CERTIFICATION i certify t",above information is flue and correct. 1�gture Print or T ype Name Print or Type Ifitle This certification must be signed by the chief appointed official (staff,; responsible for issues related to this incentive, Mayor, City Manager, County Manager/Administrator/Coordinator, or Chairperson of the City Council/Commission or Chairperson of the Board of County Commissioners. Other signatories are not acceptable: Zero points will be awarded. Signatory must be a representative-of the local government that has enacted the incentive. For purposes of this former only,if a.Development is located within a municipality but the incentive is not available in the city, Applicant may lase county incentive. For example,-if a Development is located in a town which does not have impact-fee requirements but the county has such requirements and they have a reduction or waiver of these fees for affordable housing,,the Ap)licant-may-submit a properly executed Local Goveniment Verification of Affordable Housing Incentives Form from the county. The Applicant will_not receive credit for this incentive if the certification contains corrections or`white-out' or-if the certification is scanned,imaged,altered,or retyped. The.certification.may be photocopied. Provide Behind a Tai.Labeled"E°hibit 41" UA1016(Rev. 2-11) 67 13.QQd{i)(a);67-21.0013(1)(a),F_kC. SOUTH MIAMI GARDENS (IMPROVEMENT OPTIONS) r South Miami gardens Existing Conditions • Existing Site Area... ... ... ... ... ...300,000 Square Feet • Existing Residential Units... . .. ..58 Total Dwelling Units • Existing Zoning.. . ... ... ... . . . . . . ....RM-18 (18 Units Per Acre) • Existing Project Density... ... ... ..8 Units Per Acre. r i 2001 Improvement Proposal(s) According to a 2009 study prepared by the Corridino Group dated December 2001 and entitled "A Vision: South Miami Community Redevelopment Area Multi-Famil Housing Study'; the following three (3) redevelopment proposals were identified for South, Miami Gardens: [Option #1] "New Construction Utilizing Existing Zoning of 18 Units Per Acre" • Existing Site Area... .. . ... . .. ... ... .. . .. . .300,000 Square Feet • Total Proposed Residential Units... ..126 Total Dwelling Units • Proposed Zoning... ... ... ... .. . ... .........RM-18 (18 Units Per Acre) • Proposed Project Density. . . . .. ... .... ..18 Units Per Acre [Option #21 "New Construction Utilizing Increased Zoning of 24 Units Per Acre" • Existing Site Area. . . .. . .. . .. . ... .. . ... .300,000 Square Feet • Total Proposed Residential Units... ..126 Total Dwelling Units • Proposed Zoning.. . . .. ... .. . . .. . . . .........RM-18 (18 Units Per Acre) • Proposed Project Density... ... . . . .. .. ..18 Units Per Acre [Option #3] "Rehabilitation of Existing Units and Complex" • Existing Site Area.. . ... . .. ... .. . ... ... ... .300,000 Square Feet • Total Proposed Residential Units... ..58 Total Dwelling Units • Proposed Zoning... . .. . . . . .. ... . . . .........RM-18 (18 Units Per Acre) • Proposed Project Density.. . ... . . . .. .. ..8 Units Per Acre • Proposed Rehabilitation Items... ..Central Air, Interior Renovation, Exterior Painting, Landscaping, Parking Lot Redesign, Security Access System, Appliances, Hurricane Impact Glass 2002 Survey Results Following the 2001 study prepared by the Corridino Group a formal explanation of the proposals was provided by City of South Miami Consultant, Richard E. Miller. A subsequent survey was conducted of 41 of the total South Miami Gardens Households which at the time there were 43 Occupied Households. The following survey results were obtained: 78% of those Surveyed or 32 Total Households • Indicated that they favored the Multi-Family Redevelopment Plan 15% of those Surveyed or 6 Total Households • Indicated that they might support the Multi-Family Redevelopment Plan 7% of those Surveyed or 3 Total Households • Indicated that they did not support the Multi-Family Redevelopment Plan r R South Miaani Gardens Suety nary update June 9, 2003 i A Vision: Sok�h Miami Community Redevelopment Agency tS"MCRA)Multi-Family Housing Study, completed in December 2001 identified the South Miami Gardens (SMG)Public Housing site as the number ore ranked site for redevelopment: The prr=ary purpose of the re- development plan is to develop a mixed-income housing development,which incorporates public assisted units with market rate units of various housing types. i The current development occupies approximately seven acres and contains nifty-eight housing units and a small school housing a head-start program at the north west corner of the site. The site is currently zoned RM-18 Multi-Family allowing for eighteen units per acre. The existing development has a density of approximately eight units per acre. The Miami Dade Housing Agency owns and operates the South Miami Gardens. The location and the size of the property make this project an important catalyst for the growth and development of the SMCRA area. The study analyzed three different scenarios:Rehabilitation of existing buildings, a development of 18 units per acre and a development of 24 units per acre. The last two options include demolition of all the existing structures. The first option of Rehabilitation is not considered a viable option and will not be considered any further. The other two options call for total demolition and redevelopment of the existing SMG facilities. At its meeting of May 12'2003, the SMCRA Board indicated its support of the option with 24 units per acre. This option will require the rezoning of existing zoning from RM-18 to RM-24. Further analysis would be needed to develop a preliminary phased master plan with 24 units per acre, develop unit types, establish unit mix and study elevations. The Board directed staff to put together a Scope of Work for a consultant and a time line for this effort. The Board also indicated its support for re- establishing the street grid system as recommended by the Hometown Two plans. Demolition of the SMG would require the relocation of its residents. The Redevelopment Plan will provides the opportunity for the existing residents to move back to one of the newly developed units, if they so choose. Residents of SMG were surveyed to determine their level of support or opposition to the Redevelopment Plan. The survey was conducted between February and March 2002. SMG residents were provided a detailed explanation of the multifamily redevelopment plan and were given an opportunity to ask questions about the plan. The SMCRA Board has expressed a desire to keep the relocation at a minim-am and to the extent possible limit relocation to the surrounding areas. A detailed relocation plan should be developed as the plan progresses. The phasing of the Redevelopment Plan will greatly influence the relocation plan and vice versa. As of March 18,2002 the SMG development had 43 of its 58 units occupied by residents. Two of the 58 units are out ofmanagement for use by the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Center and the Police Workstation. Of the 43 occupied units, (100%) of the households were issued surveys. i There were r or(95%)head of households that completed the survey.. There were 5% or two households that did not retun the survey. Of the 41 head of households completing the survey, 32 or(78%) support the multifamily redevelopment plan.(including the relocation implications). i S oath 3NL,ami Gardens Summary update June 09,200' 2 oft f Ii Si_;households or(15%)responded that maybe they support the plan. The remaining three households or(71,,o)did not support the redevelopment plan. Project is anticipated to be privately fimded. The subsidy needed far the public assisted portion of the housing will be derived through the revenue generated through the market rate-housing component. Request for Proposal would be sent out for interested developers for a turnkey project to design, build and manage the new development. Based on currently available information, a number of very preliminary economic pro-forma have been prepared for the redevelopment. i .......:.... . . .. �iJ - n = 2011 UNTIVIERSAL CYCLE - LOCAL GOVERTY.ME=:%VERMICATI ION-OF D FORDABLE HOUS2-9' LNC E �II�'E-S 1I PACT OF POLICMS,-ORDLNT NCFs,I?EG�-�02IN,S,vIt PLAN — P ROVISIONS ON COST OF AFFORDABLE= -°.1'T?SING DROPERTi,S OR-DEVELOP,)LENTS Name of Development: South IUliairri Gardens (Par III A 1.of the 2011 Urs:ersal Cycle Appiicatiou) See Attached Development Location: (4 t a minimum provide the address assigned-by the United States Postal Senice,including the address number_street name and city,or if the address has not yet been assigned,provide ri)the street name closest designated intersection-and city iflocated within a city or(ii)-the street-n ne,closest designated intersection and county if located in the unincorporated area of the county.) Naive of City or County Government: City of south Miarri The referenced.Local Government-currently has a process,established-by ordiuce,resolution,plan, or policy,that requires consideration of the impact vfproposed policies,Ordinances,regulations,or plan provisions on the,cost of affordable housing-prior to adoption of such policies,ordinances, _ regulations,or plan provisions. CERTIFICATION I certify that the above information is true and correct. Signature Print or Type Name Print or Type Title This certification must be signed by the chief appointed official (staff) responsible for issues related to this. incentive, Mayor, =City Manager, County Manager/Admisri uator/Coordinator, or Chairperson of the City Council/Commission or Chairperson of the Board of County Commissioners. Other signatories are not acceptable. Zero points will be awarded. Signatory must be a representative of the local government that has enacted the incentive. For purposes of this form only,if a Development is located within a municipality'but the incentive is not available in the city, Applicant-may use county incentive. For exampie, if a Development is located in a town which does not have impact fee requirements but the county has such requirements and they- have a reduction or waiver of these fees for affordable housing, the Applicant may submit.a properly executed Local Government Verification of Affordable Housing Incentives Form fi-om the county. The Applicant will not receive credit for this-incentive if the certification contains corrections or`white-out'or if the certification is scanned,imaged._ altered.or retyped. The certification may be photocopied. Provide Behind a Tab Labeled"Exhibit 43" UA1016 0R.&v. 2-11) - 67-48.OILt(I)(a):67-21-003(1)(a),-F_A.C. SOUTH MIAMI GARDENS (IMPROVEMENT OPTIONS) South Miami Gardens existing Conditions • Existing Site Area... ... ... ... ... ...300,000 Square Feet • Existing Residential Units... . .. ..58 Total Dwelling Units • Existing Zoning. . . ... ... . . . .. . .. . ....R��-18 (18 Units Per Acre) • Existing Project Density. .. ... ... ..8 Units Per Acre 2001 Improvement Proposal(s) According to a 2009 study prepared by the Corridino Group dated December 2009 and entitled "A Vision. South Miami Community Redevelopment Area Multi-Famil Housing Study", the following three (3) redevelopment proposals were identified for South Miami Gardens: [Option #1] "Blew Construction Utilizing Existing Zoning of 18 Units Per Acre" • Existing Site Area... ... . .. . . . .. . . . . ... .. . .300,000 Square Feet • Total Proposed Residential Units. . . ..126 Total Dwelling Units • Proposed Zoning... ... .. . ... ... ... .........RM-18 (18 Units Per Acre) • Proposed Project Density... ... ... .. .. ..18 Units Per Acre [Option #2] "Blew Construction Utilizing Increased Zoning of 24 Units Per Acre" • Existing Site Area. .. ... ... . .. ... ... ... ... .300,000 Square Feet • Total Proposed Residential Units. .. ..126 Total Dwelling Units • Proposed Zoning... .. . ... ... ... ... .........RM-18 (18 Units Per Acre) • Proposed Project Density... .. . ... ... . ..18 Units Per Acre [Option #3] "Rehabilitation of Existing Units and Complex" Existing Site Area.. . . . . ... . . . .. . .. . ... ... .300,000 Square Feet • Total Proposed Residential Units. . . ..58 Total Dwelling Units • Proposed Zoning.. . .. . ... ... .. . ... .........RM-18 (18 Units Per Acre) • Proposed Project Density... ... .. . .. . . ..8 Units Per Acre • Proposed Rehabilitation Items. . . ..central Air, Interior Renovation, Exterior Painting, Landscaping, Parking Lot Redesign, Security Access System,, Appliances, Hurricane Impact Glass S ' 2002 Survey Results Following the 2001 study prepared by the Corridino Group a formal explanation of the proposals was provided by City of South Miami Consultant, Richard E. Miller. A subsequent survey was conducted of 41 of the total South Miami Gardens Households which at the time ',here were 43 Occupied Households. The following survey results were obtained: 78% of those Surveyed or 32 Total Households Indicated that they favored the Multi-Family Redevelopment Plan 15% of those Surveyed or 6 Total Households • Indicated that they might support the Multi-Family Redevelopment Plan 7% of those Surveyed or 3 Total Households • Indicated that they did not support the Multi-Family Redevelopment Plan I South N ami iya-1 dens Sum===update June 9,2003 f A vision: South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency(SMCRA)Multi-Family Housing j Study, completed in December 2001 identiued the South Miami Gardens(SMG)Public Housing site as the number one ranked site for redevelopment: The primary purpose of the re- development plan is to develop a mixed income housing development, which incorporates public assisted units with market rate units of various housing types. The current develop rent occupies approximately seven acres and contains fifty-eight housing units and a small school housing a head-start program at the north west corner of the site. The. site is currently zoned RM-18 Multi-Family allow�Lng for eighteen units per acre. The existing development has a density of approximately eight units per acre. The Zvliami Dade Housing Agency owns and operates the South Miami Gardens. The location and the size of the property make this project an important catalyst for the growth and development of the SMCR A area. The study analyzed three different scenarios: Rehabilitation of existing buildings, a development of 18 units per acre and a development of 24 units per acre. The last two options include demolition of all the existing structures. The first option of Rehabilitation is not considered a viable option and will not be considered any further. The other two options call for total demolition and redevelopment of the existing SMG facilities. At its meeting of May 12'2003, the SMC^ Board indicated its support of the option with 24 units per acre. This option will require the rezoning of existing zoning from RM-18 to RM-24. Further analysis would be I needed to develop a preliminary phased.master plan with 24 units per acre, develop unit types, establish unit mix and study elevations. The Board directed staff-to put together a Scope of Work for a consultant and a time line for this effort. The Board also indicated its support for re- establishing the street grid system as recommended by the Hometown Two plans. Demolition of the SMG would require the relocation of its residents. The Redevelopment Plan will provides the opportunity for the existing residents to move back to one of the newly developed units, if they so choose. Residents of SMG were surveyed to determine their level of support or opposition to the Redevelopment Plan. The survey was conducted between February and March 2002. SMG residents were provided a detailed explanation of the multifamily redevelopment plan and were given an opportunity to ask questions about the plan. The SMCRA Board has expressed a desire to keep the relocation at a minimum and to the extent possible limit relocation to the surrounding areas. A detailed relocation plan should be developed as the plan progresses. The phasing of the Redevelopment Plan will greatly influence the relocation plan and vice versa. As of March 18,2002 the SMG development had 43 of its 58 units occupied by residents. Two of the 58 units are out of management for use by the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Center and the Police Workstation. Of the 13 occupied units, (100%) of the households were issued surveys. i There were 4'_ or(95%)head of households that completed the survey, There were 5% or two households that did not return the survey. Of the 41 head of households completing the survey, 32 or(78%) support the multifamily redevelopment plan(including the relocation implications). I: f� Sours Miami Gardens Summary update June 09,2003 I Page 2oft Six households or(15%)responded that maybe they support the plan. The remaining three households or(7°o)did not support the redevelopment plan. Project is anticipated to be privately funded. The subsidy needed for the public assisted portion of the housing will be derived through the revenue generated through the market rate-housing component. Request for Proposal would be sent out for interested.developers for a turn key project to design, build and manage the new development. Based on currently available information, a number of very preliminary economic pro-forma have been prepared for the redevelopment. I�I I r✓fit!"�®Yki�`��"i<J r f - �'`rr #f`' A q 3 �`N ~"� � �'T'ka� �3}{"'� ��i �` ``,^'�fjA,1- •�.l 1• ,i h 4` d�+ 4-`r" l"" Y� n.-.: Jr�t � 1°.t�irtjr,�+e�rr Hr+•i!��{.� tt,1: .✓+'IC,J �, i� �31,� \ t r'•' Ir {�u�j�'i!• � '. I.{��.�.3rr{'i"ffi P4 " ✓1. u �r»aRrl/ J i Ilr7»,tf•s}j,,iry4� 0lH IN 11 '�����1 AI r �` ��y 'iy f1 �, i��;�t��)R'i+ r (R. JnI � tern •��'� x'�•-��':�'�{�yr}�i�I,• Fa � �.N k � r ' � 4e rti,M{%� �'-�1i�4� h ! i.Er��li'�.�'1 �i �., �( 4... � •g}� S '' 'Ii ,�Fi �, rF^}'x� E��� V71 3 ,} 2+ �}� �� A�• ��`�# t i x�'� ;redB Yi Aut ,k sA J��* � bnF-#.., •^...'� `Z rt- '}•�;�",; 3i1 } F �r+ ytn r#+dam+ d { t, �* -:}�.'tr y��„� '�` i"�1 B `iiJ`d���itltk V f�'S� �':�i7�°`6 �' •�G. ' r E Op { '�' .fit � J�c.i � r. ,t -N+aC�+ y� 7�'1}. a. + .�Ai•�to ., `. r.- � �. +i 1 a�+:,�.. •�d � S°iii t 5 rJs� • '+ N �•.Lr �.tr��Qr� } Jt' 7 w �"' �� � rc.f�f} s S 4'}J%h fy" ad +.Rf i`� � • - ���� I� r6•._ s�#Jr J f�f x �s\�� � .3.d {��`�{•. }� � t7�yrj s• ��f f,�t` � �n 1 � ; { j•y��"Y� i }� a 7i��^t� !i.. r+ at..'. !i � 7� t :� r{4�;f'"a"1v��•a�'} �ia �� + 'nn ;{ti��•-�tt^_hC�1^I,,Er�r�{2PP`ii y, �;x, a'�7 .'rs}2A. �_. � )FU$`,� ��. I.I d�}FI S1+ra••^x• it }i7A,, f#7d� ^a n5 *`(�Y� + ',v ,,i7" prrm,�.i-- �ri'SA;£ 1# v�rrt��ih.L' •f�.5��g'�' ��1�.'� r +r rtiv` �4P PORT", A t�'L ..,�,it:gw.t• f+�. 1 4, S L>f I r� ����� �.rJ, ��� u�y,�+yf�"¢•' tr �A r� ir` 4 9rr�,�ry�,. 1.firL�x--xrft.'��,`r �c?J rS�,4 .p,��(,�9' „��>n]* ;,J ,,.,:e �S ,�h� ,i-77:�f•t �';lr• �at�7iR ;?.��+'.' "��`�„rte„, S' sS•�.`� ;rn"�'A� i �'ka ! \ a.?��t� �B,y`}i�.�c�t X111 � ! �r %. ' Y j�f,nh��py,'4 !•`a• �"',fit� li M i' y#� ,d _2 t} F, .4� ;r'r yam ,P i�f� r ( f •... t.• rM 4 " 19 T y r7 ?iG« IRA Sf rh rr '`r i1 •�1'r' SY Nf�'T'7' �ji N �� �,-;�`lI����ir9 `F"� ,yr - «•'y i 1 r "?'x�r� N'�v y so �{ � � ��.�1 � �'7 ,�,/,r5iik r t�� g!y .�,a H-td�� -a, , � �r I '�► o f y 1 'r�r ri 9�Er♦ v�fYA +S 7f t( rr iL'tzyr F I f l +4 d y r - &F �I hS H r-•, `' ;b! iL , v.rh•l!l {�'r .'x '7N Fv J .t�af' 1 %.1 F 7 �, �rF �tm.-1� 54� ��'�a, ��ya'7a.}s...�rw.-e �,i7/ r•,.It�a �'# � �,�•},'°#d Fti'} (� - �” 6 613'�^'A�OT i T'Luf'���ra✓' fv l - 1J .5v1��', •sC �y� I �C��yS ��”fir' tl+ i Zf' (1� )q"'� Z' V'Y'i ,Y� �f{ t`t h\��If r���+ %r- i l���SY� �P' >�' i^aS '';`^� .N. r� rl •r f � " �zt'tlfE�v I i'+,�. � � � ��.Ms ✓��� fii!sJ �;���3 tai k r��t'i.ss�y^.1"x.17411 1 � �'! 6 �dd+ �1•��!• �1�'� li i, I�•is' �4�{y�`fd•y�,A'A�� js { ',�,�+ •: F��r a�i }{>7w ff. .r" 1 k¢� L1F" ' FP wz r ._ •,.a� r�) � �, .itr�.�i�j�'R ft��,j7ie �i I "+-1 �•�T '�i I �1 , t �tY� - +,° MR" ,$' v' r�i' .r •�i 'yt,{F f uiP S' t k i'�•�t , ''°a '°` `'a.,.t at,z., , r• � OOl9' � L16�,f�"�d!! r4 5 .�.._ ri1��:�,• a"t �. � t _ � i j wS/ IesL >; � � ��'. -"�'.. 'Oar •"• o '� � �. ,f-4 _ ., l6Sl � .,,��1a �'•.1 s�!rr+�'� s {_ �:,;jrr6�'<'�����'°�� E Lu .L 'Y�•�. ,,. •.,k � }160: p ,....� �• 0 •'sag • .•'�. ti 109 -e. ota r.,"r a,r� �■"< �,a .a r tiLxcr a:�4■t■,■ba..- r �r -_�.fT." � r ° ja vuum 6059 n 9tr c q � 2 ° �; :'0 g �_.. � :s 'h: dug }• �" u� .. LLy 8 ° �� h eJ l9GS 1tik1 r 5t4 se. s N W 5.7. � O 7 a, 461 ✓: � � ,, ��� 4 ,, n m!."nom 1 4.r'� '•, 'i!s •�v. ■ x;-. °w i G ° 5o H AV CBS. EL95 :J,v ss .,� 65�,�,,r' '�•° '. v SiC v'c w�,ya ■- i 6305 z 6345 Lio ° °a ° ° BSBS •t' `�.'6g�9, c •�-° .12 P6 r LEL9 •� ••�•l fH n �+ ° p�i��Gp.9°sr■ 1 ■ a $ m 127 1212 2 LL09 SLOG i� Le � SW 59TH A Lses ■ a 0 J969 oes � — [� r 5900 g � c�. m ■ � t S ° iS � 9lfiS LL6 a • l26, t L9V9 �' 'o ':":.:■ Nirr.rn A L7iti S4S%'!L 9o9t asot K' 6510 OZS9- 4P ' � ? 61 j 6S6S Li. I�f'p`"'' El 9665 9665 �`-00�1�� 040p 01 t 90 3 <..m p ° '�« ref 69 1 MQL ZL9 SO2:- ° 1 R .° ®� 6ZI9 i 06L9 4^c E19� 125 ® ■ �■■■■■■■i � 6 r.,� �■ .IZl9 ° L Q <!g 6{ia . r fi169 yi44ti4Qo444ti id8i�d�i�ril iP■SM+ti°�d +.11 0 i i 171 911!I I I I I I i i 0■talpodipildt sw D f° T 1 ' 0ti69 ���d 5400 t� p �0BL9 g 2� � - 1 - I�t'o uuL OEZ9 = - y m G n ��. - LZg X6291 LZE9 ° oy�- E!! s 7) 1m Fs ° ° 6255. 5270 6SZ9 8255 ij 3 :5290 flk8 19 I vi J-r. 1 SBZ9 9 1629 LOE9 6361 , ° 7 AW M4M°AAIZ - IAJ 63 RD AV C ff£9 19 •'� g °3RD CT OK9 Q o �' 0310 JZf9 jj• ° LLEG i pgf9"'—''��'�+y{ l °9 LOCO Iii. C9 Lees o6o'g 19E9 9 N - N'° i . °° {- �°u.. SW "04 00 ai m 1 69 tog ° ° S e 5,j10 6735 m • l tA�l f.fA.4�'4#..;4M.F.4.�1/IAf.N�4t..M:a tFti�lI4NAA•ML)..J•K.9i..ik..fsl.�etLafW0..hN.1.arts.q�M.f•MFi.a.lJUS144,4.i:[.RIF.I.r FSfll y� r ���• xv! �� II r Ah,j I'r A..I� � � .. ^T;r^'—'----—e qN s14�111r i?LS ;y 'Tr, ,. •.tKI ,�.,�r. 'yr. , :L iG � Yo' ��'" ;b� �.','I� �� 'el ''�ZY �• `;S i' !1 f �M laiLlLSla I nl t '1i 4.A" '� LL 16t6 Mel A S.y, +•z a y. '4C' it.15, 9Lb'i 5g7S F+ - R. rr - 9555. Y ,t ;i, ri6t9 l ��,.!:x.l `I'� .�•� � i9�IS �t:� � 'tine' ..-r•,-a..- pd89 IiPS s ew.. Lug A z :in4 HJ r^MS � 9'3AS fiA05 a Y e7���rE+ i910"i,�� �•i:4 fir�y., ' �. IWS 0059 ...O ,1�•-r,.. 3Jy w ': I;;.�,11 � ,n I E'a !il� •4�r ,7k 1 � 1G° � �')i Y••. W S•!�QI}'F:I!'. pws � b66i ynA'i 7h r: ILtl9 dt r' F? t�' La 0909 I 9 _d (AMt �_ Ic19`fz 17t'j 171Si9MS y��* FFF � i� � I[fi ei. !"'*� ;�[te�l dl�a ,• , Is x .� ., ., .. •, Ir,I ,a 1 c c. I �. I c• ^.I m 04,9 �. _ Z ✓i � it [ rt� d 1 1 0 r.4 ,. -r [4 k M v w! f-•1 , DChot-jooOLJr OD �' u _2J11UNiVERSA?.CYCb - L0CALGOVT'RNTVIENTTV VT ICAT10N0FAFF0RDAEsTE HCjSDzGI°:CENTWES_'XP E D1 1_D PERAV=11 Pi G PROCESS F 0 R AFF 3RDABLE HO SPNG Name of Development: South Idtanii Gardens (=.Td f- 1.of-the-20 11 Universal Cycle Application) -See Attached Development Location: (At a minimum provide the address_assigned by the United Stares Postal Service,including.the address nunber,street name-and city,or.iftlie address has not yet been assigned provide(i)-the street.name,closest designated intersection and city iflocated within a-city or(ii)the street name;closest designatedinieisection and county if located rathe unincorporated area of the county.) Name of City-or County Government: city of south Mimi Name of Jurisdiction'that will issue building permits: City of south Miami The City/County of City of south Miami currently-administers an expedited (dame of City L--County) pennitting process for affordable-housing-en cted by (Ordinance,Resolution Number-or citation-of policy) adopted Date(mm/dd yyyy) ' 'CERTMCATIGN. I certjAythat the above information is true.and correct Signature Print or Type Name Print or Type Title This certification must be signed by the chie*-appointed official (staff)responsible for issues related to this incentive, Mayor, City Manager, County Manager/Administrator/Coordinator,or Chairperson of the City Council/Commission or Chairperson of the Board of County Comrnissioners. Other signatories are not acceptable. Zero points will be awarded if the certification is improperly signed. Signatory must be a representative of the local government.that has enacted the incentive. For purposes of this-form only;i a Development is located within a municipality but the incentive is not available in the city,Applicant may use county incentive. For example, if a Development is located in a town which does not have impact.fee-reglrisements but the county has such requirements and they have a redhlction or-i,,dver of these fees for housing.- the Applicant may subrlit-a properly executed Local Gover nient Ver­'.h ca ton of_fordable Dousing hcentive-STorm_fiomthe county. The Applicant will -not receive credit for this .incentive if *lie certification .contains corrections or `white-out' or if the ce Lification is scanned, imaged, altered. or ret� ed. The certiflcattion, may be photocopied. Provide Behind a Tab_Labeied`Exhibit 4^" UA!016(Rev. 2-11) 6i18.0040)(a);67-21-003(1)(a),F k C. Property Information Map Page 1 of 1 My Home Miami-Dade County, Florida y MIAMI E Property Information Map Summary Details: ` f Folio No.: 9-4025-063-0010 SW 84i7N 8�- �. Property: 5949 SW 68 ST ' Mailing MIAMI-DADE COUNTY qe Address: MIAMI-DADE HOUSING AGENCY 51M b6Yli CSR 1401 NW 7 ST MIAMI FL Asa � w� 33125-3601 Property Information: F Primary Zone: 800 MULTI-FAMILY >f ESIDENTIAL LUC: 047 DADE COUNTY Beds/Baths: /5 ., r �� rt ,,. ' ,. Floors: � �, Living Units: ' � �sT d'S Foota e: 5,072 Lot Size: .26 ACRES Year Built: 1975 5 54 40 3.26 AC PB . . 102-19 UNIVERSITY Description: DNS SUB NO 3 TRACT C'LOT SIZE 123554 SQ Assessment Information: 9. ; -- y� Year 2011 2010 Land Value: 1,124,700 1,124,700 4, Building Value: 1,481,383 1,499,442 u, Market Value: 2,606,083 2,624,142 { v. Assessed Value: 12,606,083 2,624.142 n+_. Taxable Value Information: Aerial Photography-2009 0 152 ft ear: 2011 2010 This map was created on 11117/20114:26:15 PM for reference purposes only. Applied Applied axing Authority: Exemption/ Exemption/ Web Site©2002 Miami-Dade County.All rights reserved. Taxable Taxable Value: Value: Regional: $2,60$60,083/ $2,62$40,142/ County: $2.606,083/ $2,624,142/ $0 $0 City: $2.606,083/ $2,624,142/ $0 $0 School Board: $2,606,083/ $2,624,142/ $0 I $0 http://gisims2.miamidade.gov/myhome/printmap.asp?mapurl=http://gisims2.miamidade.g... 11/17/2011 yx3 EX,-i c, CITY OF SOUTH MLA-VII NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEAIRLNG NOTICE IS HEREBY given that the City Comm_ ission of the City of South Miami, Florida will conduct Public Hearings at its regular City.Commission meeting scheduled for Tuesday. November 16, 2010 beginning at 7:30 P.M.in the City Commission Chambers,6130 Sunset Drive,to consider the following item(s): An Ordinance of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami Florida,amending the Future Land Use Map of the South Miami Comprehensive Plan by changing the future land use map category from Multi-Family Residential (Four Story) to Low.Density Affordable Multiple-Family Residential (Two Story) for properties identified as the South Miami Gardens ?apartments located at and specifically legally described as.5949 SW 68 Street (Folio No. 09- 4025-063-=0010) and 5961 SW 68 Street (Folio No. 09-4025-063-0020); providing for. severability;providing for ordinances in conflict;and providing an effective date. SW 66TH TER I r L a SW 67TH ST 2: SW 68TH ST 5040 SUBJECT � i �. u: 44 ar, 's u 1 PROPERTIES . t � 5858 I F311 jj ALL interested parties are invited to attend and will be heard. For further information,.please contact the City Clerk's Office at:305-663-6340. Maria M.Menendez,CMC City Clerk Pursuant to Florida Statutes 286.0105,the City hereby advises the public that if a person decides to appeal any decision"made by this Board, Agency or Commission with.respect to any matter considered at its meeting or hearing,he or she will need a record of the proceedings,and that for such purpose, affected person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. SOUTH MIAMI GARDENS (IMPROVEMENT OPTIONS) South Miami Gardens = Existing Conditions • Existing Site Area... . .. ... ... ... ...300,000 Square Feet • Existing Residential Units... ... ..58 Total Dwelling Units • Existing Zoning... .. . .. . . .. ... .. . ....RM-18 (18 Units Per Acre) • Existing Project Density... ... ... ..8 Units Per Acre y 2001 Improvement Proposal(s) According to a 2001 study prepared by the Corridino Group dated December 2001 and entitled "A Vision: South Miami Community Redevelopment Area Multi-Famii Housing Study'', the following three (3) redevelopment proposals were identified for South Miami Gardens: [Option #1] "New Construction Utilizing Existing Zoning of 18 Units Per Acre" • Existing Site Area. .. ... . .. ... .. . . . . . . . ... .300,000 Square Feet • Total Proposed Residential Units.. . ..126 Total Dwelling Units • Proposed Zoning... . . 8 (18 Units Per Acre) • Proposed Project Density. . . ... . . . .... ..18 Units Per Acre [Option #2] "New Construction Utilizing Increased Zoning of 24 Units Per Acre" • Existing Site Area... ... . .. ... ... ... .. . .. . .300,000 Square Feet • Total Proposed Residential Units. .. ..126 Total Dwelling Units • Proposed Zoning... ... ... .. 8 (18 Units Per Acre) • Proposed Project Density... .. . . . . .. . . ..18 Units Per Acre [Option #3] "Rehabilitation of Existing Units and Complex" • Existing Site Area... . . . ... .. . ... ... ... . .. .300,000 Square Feet • Total Proposed Residential Units. .. ..58 Total Dwelling Units • Proposed Zoning.. . ... . . . . . . ... . .. .........RM-18 (18 Units Per Acre) • Proposed Project Density... . . . ... .... ..8 Units Per Acre • Proposed Rehabilitation Items... ..central Air, interior Renovation, Exterior Painting, Landscaping, Parking Lot Redesign, Security .Access System, Appliances, Hurricane Impact Glass 20 02 Survey Results Following the 2009 study prepared by the Corridino Group a formal explanation of the proposals was provided by City of South Miami Consultant, Richard E. Miller. A subsequent survey was conducted of 49 of the total South Miami Gardens Households which at the time ',here were 43 Occupied Households. The following survey results were obtained: 78% of those Surveyed or 32 Total Households • Indicated that they favored the Multi-Family Redevelopment Plan .155% of those Surveyed or 6 Total Households • Indicated that they might support the Multi-Family Redevelopment Plan 7% of those Surveyed or 3 Total Households • Indicated that they did not support the Multi-Family Redevelopment Plan South Miami G ar dens Suu�—.y update June 9,2003 A Vision: South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency(SMCRA)Multi-Family Housing Study, completed in December 2001 identified the South Mira i Gardens(SMG)Public Housing site as the number one ranked site for redevelopment: The primm ary purpose of the re- development plan is to develop a mixed-income housing development,which incorporates public assisted units with market rate units of various housing types. The current development occupies approximately seven acres and contains fi fl-eight housing units and a small school housing a head-start program at the north west corner of the site. The site is currently zoned RML -18 Multi-Family allowing for eighteen units per acre. The existing development has a density of approximately eight units per acre. The Miami Dade Housing Agency owns and operates the South Miami Gardens. The location and the size of the property make this project an important catalyst for the growth and development of the SMCRA area. The study analyzed three different scenarios: Rehabilitation of existing buildings, a development of 18 units per acre and a development of 24 units per acre. The last two options include demolition of all the existing structures. The first option of Rehabilitation is not considered a viable option and will not be considered any fu-then. The other two options call for total demolition and redevelopment of the existing SMG facilities. At its meeting of May 12,2003, the SM�RA Board indicated its support of the option with 24 units per acre. This option will require the rezoning of existing zoning from RM-18 to P-M-24. Further analysis would be I needed to develop a preliminary phased master plan with 24 units per acre, develop unit types, establish unit mix and study elevations. The Board directed staff to put together a Scope of Work for a consultant and a time line for this effort. The Board also indicated its support for re- establishing the street grid system as recommended by the Hometown Two plans. Demolition of the SMG would require the relocation of its residents. The Redevelopment Plan will provides the opportunity for the existing residents to move back to one of the newly developed units, if they so choose. Residents of SMG were surveyed to determine their level of support or opposition to the Redevelopment Plan. The survey was conducted between February and March 2002. SMG residents were provided a detailed explanation of the multifamily z redevelopment plan and were given an opportunity to ask questions about the plan. The SMCRA Board has expressed a desire to keep the relocation at a minimum and to the extent possible limit relocation to the surrounding areas. A detailed relocation plan should be developed as the plan progresses. The phasing of the Redevelopment Plan wig?greatly influence the relocation plan and vice versa- As of March 18,2002 the SWIG development had 43 of its 58 units occupied by residents. Two of the 58 units are out of management for use by the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Center and the Police Workstation. Of the 43 occupied units, (100%) of the households were issued surveys. P i l here Were 4i or(95%)head of households that completed the survey. There were 5% or two households that did not return the survey. Of the 41 head of hour-eholds completing the survey. 32 or(78%) support the multifamily redevelopment plan(including the relocation implications). South,Nfiami Gardens Summary update June 09,2003 ! 1'age o of 2 Six households or(l5%)responded that maybe they support tree plan. The remaining three households or(7%)did not support the redevelopment plan. Project is anticipated to be privately funded. The subsidy needed for the public assisted portion of the housing will be derived through the revenue generated through the market rat -housing component. Request for Proposal would be sent out for interested developers for a turn key project to design,build and manage the new development. Based on currently available information, a number of very preliminary economic pro-forma have been prepared for the redevelopment. z I ' .f�+� ,�,.A py ,t. �'y F1•Z.��1f r � i t d�y +rn�}� �'k ,'2.?,t`r� p �','�7 .y� Z>�HfD°"fia�f`rs'�ct,_ �.L ' � �+�p� 1} L �� 4 ♦Y•� -. 4 N ''�j,��?�j�b�� t� ryt���`„,r� ^.�s jj•{ �� k a gr'(r r C` h,r r'> :�mlf� VV+,• !'yi'' :r` 4,�Y`�,1• I �,,(Y r 1Mx � t;kk. �Y� '�. - •;` f WNC vrr�•. Y v'ry i „i j rF jaT1I} Y7' .I 4�� s r. d iJy R.i'.N� ie• 7 t7+t Jl! ��q Y�} S� k } r'9' Sf!'tiz y tit R• , - ',`i v^ '{"r 71f Ei' f� car } ,.•"t' '� � d 7 '9r tF i . s y.fh. y s 5. ,1 t^ , •{gig ) r( 14 h. {� aa`e,,,r f� �.� p �. 4�• r t•�fi1'FQ��*`�"• fat s �,������tr y+f'Y Jt l��'i,'}.�� F �� V'�l t r � ;1��y 'Ftn•�t'�{ � - �. Y � �b; J•� r����itl. S'X �i Li,.r.��� �, ��r � ' 'r �� dl cl� r `�s: Yr��lV I Lit j rP `11'^ 7. W. 'i+lt Y n o- f1Q4 f'Ikr tt` R" '..siA• 1.`, rS, N. 1�' .k� '7 � I. f SE N.- c 7 v ;{� -Fay, ,ICJ "'li? is dV bd 1 Fit K4 !u i a 4 ��l. �t r a t•t. •,gyp. �' � + _ (.a a J ,r� e �.;�F) �.R4t'S 5-fs IY�'+ �� � i���-. a�; f.,l �N r ! "�,C/��:f•7� t n ,)J.a i�, ��cr"�R�-f'�•4•�l l��•,! 1 �- � •,�'c#�t��f.��t/*��,� y"^'`�f i�'�'��i��� 'p ,c+, 'a r��'A��Yt�i, ��'til�l l�.t ; 61 ���� µ�L 1 f!J ���,�4 Y3•a M )�r y'Ji..t t�I r +�p�,�, � ht � 1 �,l.s=,�``� wA �9 „�k5"J� �"F?i- q,M #•�+• .� r�¢•�f tift.��,�`' '7 AF"';`� #�e '�St`R�?'ie '���o tn� r''�((r 41 Rd� /Vim •'� ,lSx�s. � �'�} Y�rte/'{1�� '��.h'_ � �� 1<� y3 Pi�f ,y° 'R''� I ��!.t n�i�a� �C. 'r � !S� �•I r t.� 5 f'•hL 3�'.f`f /„F r,• � � �r•RA� }y; I freF' J� 1 � Kau�• },r 1is �t8n 0.-e; � r tr 6 x, I ar-1 i�.,•rf � ^�'ir�;l��ke,��t�' ��`�'fd ,�,�, Y i•t�' �' 'd fCJ�".'� 2`r10 ��l � .7,�•Y{,..�r�+t �' •,t ryi �<. u �;R'°�1�� e '� "^"���41��e�+;; rs' ���.� ' �'` a����r�:.� �; 1 L•�xfp 8':C�X-'?i' �i ^•t{. � r Y vJM}�.Z£x'r.#t�r }�'''i � �;�"Y S?li:• n+91 ma��� '-01�'r" :� � r�Q. �i- 1. 'd5 �� J.. � , r� qi ki� F+g y �qq, tt,,� j�A� r Yf y • rpy'� I� r�[ ft�:A> xla Ykx i "I ._�Z�a`f�' }}r91.,'jlr SA t,1fy,�� I ®fir,�et 'air - fi�i "�. � rt •�s - �� �� S!A! -r' f 1 •�Sf IrtYa �Y!I F:IIj {'/" .e . it 1 f y i4'"L[ 'fr �y1N„ 1 Ki4 4•Ti1z. 3 1 Y �f, 'f'Jw'tl"s"�rr �T 1 r x .�y��l-tJ 'd'..• � � ���y"s.q � '�' r '•^c.'.{'I - U�`{.S`,Fr! plo '�•r'}G y�� �xd� *��. 5 p � �� �.JY: z Y �•� •�iJl#-t+ __ _;>i rt. f�t 4{ l' UM, elk 1sJ0. f c' 1 a� y Zip tt �),Y,,kf�s��� F� � �,r r }, kt��,�j��+� a r-i S,.i'n: ,�'�1 •.�.,. '± n�l^y i7;'d��ir�. :,F'.yF i,��e r -�'H.� �y...k, 3rr?��' l"�a°' ✓'r`��,d: y¢'1 7 E � �✓ ', f } 6RlN'iTs rtZ'" �?fi5� rYd't•C `��' r5' '� J i 3"Y �� igl l✓ '� ro y r,r 3 r•i'+ �y f) t"ry'ryf di �f)r� q �I 6SC ila �r""'�.�t,'�-•^r e�'°+�. -#2�4 I rn Ln�ry�!. t t� yns r� �'Nhf �� r r.rJt� ,,s'`{'-�a `ri•!v�r t t.t a � r a�YT ��': q4 � e�i �( S# (' INS�+F-�`�d4d �1 i js yt�.trr�xr'�{',h f{ 1� ,�{' •�✓,.�5��k r� r'�i � r � to Ni -yam" y�r•� ! 3 Vl. J r .E���2•- r � ,1`Y nJ - Y�kI�WII 12>:S' f6 c� Yt'',5L1' yl�'„: +�`+`r+7�i tt r r 4 f-�r ry t �.r•}y i� ,}1�•I 4 �l r tw PY �,.,.��tt k .rr X'- �r a: V+'• 'fps -re�}.F i e {; + �,tW.yS' Y� k!f_Y`�F Vi , -}, 5{fi �'L�#f"+r r, �'.LiSR1�.L) I. �•s �@; Br�� .r t{}�,��, ';.f� �> �}�y'-74 .. �s� - ..,r•'ir` � I r1 rt?r. 'v fA r �s tY 1 2„s�'�6 v ty s r )': •+u.?e�'v`t�„ riv' �-r z'rJ , i �� j 7..- to �• x k t s' -.�.,iv 4 F-k i! .' � Y.��•t f)J d i,�'_�r���y{11�; i '� L�J� �-r7"•1 � f,e i 1_ [.., f;Iz�- 'i't:s� t J;3�N if�•. n i�+ryii''�k�u t��•� _ :�g° °s 41�"YT f.. ~ t�t't}� sn 1 �r '°�rt i ��C'. (l�ix s: �_ V,.Vic.�c �.`5 ,.�!�=:.".. ,r��R ��,"r�.yr�',fi? ;"3'�� i �-• .3 1F ' f � 'N91 o 0 ° F[gf �''•'i'r? "x3 'a,� f5y yy^:i 1� _ .,,. N Y, y �3�A �M1 S � •y. .i k' •V j .� � ¢ �� ��J.• y bhp �� y t t y� • 4'y. ij jj .S�9. 10 is�� S �L y and Y •- roiYr:s.: ..,,�!•i ---c,:Y■.i.,■�*.v4:•rs:.._i.s•.s'ia.■a.or::_.,:■ cmi+ti:'�e,.,�'1 ■.�■■ i"■ 5i: ■� ■■j IT 6059 OH Odm ••••� ./ '`* � g'3' E"s tit 94 A Oy e n LSLS S y ti Slg m Im zz 12 `3 W 57 ail it e B a° 5r FIBS :'• �s<s ., 'y■'`' 8TH AV .� �,. : apt r ■ � 6305 SZE9 6346 a �e BSBS -3. -Al r 'o ss. lEL9 ,t cl Li °' LL9S- I o SLBS 'ti sW 0 59TH A �se9 °5900 g ° v, I� ■ f5 � 8165 Ll6 ° ° • ors i5.3 9959 ^� � � �• 1189 $ S ^y°� 1969 6`''� ■� ■ 0]..s.a ° i �i 7'titi4's�9t d{o m 0001 O60L i X441<. 6510 d Q: ® i zn p 'S •. :3 o 6569 i. ��� d ® 9665 SfifiS 6 soot 6"W p = o .:itd!Yr 9Q Of+F 1 W o 69 * (�'r fi107 C 't C �QQ; d .r•y�p°j 99 0 m d $ 7 20 6219 'p.919 EL9 6125„,3, -LZIB ° W@7 ��i ■ .� •■ � gb,w��yw,yyesy ra 6�.dddddddd idddddddddYd ■d�011i�i�0��6H1i1�Y�C Oiii�y SW ,y5�9 6400 0 `;o 0919 g, Cl CT 270 't"y l oE2s vv L79 X6291 12E9 ° "^Sy $ 9� Zs9 ' 6270 65Z9 ! _ 6265 6290 S9Z0 9 lfiZ9 LOE9 6381 t _.L I e D Ti 11 �� °�° y.....e .;F-- ° ° ° .... ..�. .COOL °� 9p — — °by m I 0£f £f£9 p� AA ° S 3RD CT ° 04E9 2 632p tZf9 m � !` ° t r••�..at°u)�r Im Befs -rT' I coos 1k.66es Bro I o in lees 0969 1869 1) 4 ,o ! 0069 W69 7- �o° o on o,� , S S g726 OBL9g 64 o __,.'. i i �•--a-""'+— 6735 m SVA '" 4R�R..lN.1••:RTI��'R.��J .l.,wry.RR•.wn+.IM./WMY•IIJN.w4t.+.I.MMJ'...a.wJiWJY/.RJ�AMJas.u},.I.q.M./4s:y.•.PY•.1.lala'.ta.IYUGY Y�a..I,7 �_77-1 .Si 4.�. 1 'n 4 � �' ,R��' is -N � e f� i•i Lk ib � Y'a'«��"' ;Si ;�• � + r�ri '�� J: er'i�, i! :,�� �• 'v 1;11.11C�,t'la 1i. .. , •n11 "L -�.� .rl��' e;" 1E 'i I$ i8 Iii t l6LS Was IKBS - ' on Yi , IBL9 . _3 I :� ;'�I j RdBS ' 11RS z, •of �Ir,�� �;, .'lot. ;3J:b H!n�;L4S _ a)9s 6aev ti �} j+t i 96k ♦- � ;9@�i rlBaC La � 1665 `OBS9 �.,�8�` •.-47 "�;.�: BIbS CZES 6t6S % I r,,,..A S Z M3S5 I r' l H w,>n' 11 '119A�1 ` ti ry 1 19th 010 Ong tool it Ts ••••v•«...«••.��R+,a,• «.••.•.re••. ...« •.••.••.•aY.•.e..«a.••e.•r.arws.a• � 1,✓� ' .et 1. 1 n. I ►, � j I�. ' _ � P9C9 � �`, ' � I� '• •6169 _. .€�"fl 'fr`ry ; .� �... ..., .,, ., 1 1.� ,-e 1< o i w v I o .._� � S ,� �fb'9. .... n... C..�...,. y2•-',w 'L+ J 1 Y, ✓• a � ti l=, - to !: f fl p, v ✓, la 1 t� 0 f� ivy t4 ��wii((['���o°-�{{ CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY given that the City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida will conduct Public Hearings at its regular City Commission meeting scheduled for Tuesday, November 16, 2010 beginning at 7:30 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers,6130 Sunset Drive,to consider the following item(s): An Ordinance of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami Florida, amending the Future Land Use Map of the South Miami Comprehensive Plan by changing the future land use map category from Multi-Family Residential (Four Story) to Low.Density Affordable Multiple-Family Residential (Two Story) for properties identified as the South Miami Gardens Apartments located at and specifically legally described as 5949 SW 68 Street (Folio No. 09- 4025-063--0010) and 5961 SW 68 Street (Folio No. 09-4025-063-0020); providing for severability;providing for ordinances in conflict;and providing an effective date. SW 66TH TER Ifs! -' SW 67TH ST SW 68TH ST ssao SUBJECT PROPERTIES sass 6811 � ALL interested parties are invited to attend and will be heard. For further information,please contact the City Clerk's Office at:305-663-6340. Maria M.Menendez,CMC City Clerk Pursuant to Florida Statutes 286.0105,the City hereby advises the public that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by this Board, Agency or Commission with.respect to any matter considered at its meeting or hearing,he or she will need a record of the proceedings,and that for such purpose, affected person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. SOUTH MIAMI GARDENS (IMPROVEMENT OPTIONS) South Miami Gardens - Existing Conditions • Existing Site Area... . . . ... . . . ... ...300,000 Square Feet • Existing Residential Units. .. . . . ..58 Total Dwelling Units • Existing Zoning... .. . ... ... .. . ... ....RM-18 (18 Units Per Acre) • Existing Project Density... ... . . . ..8 Units Per Acre 2001 Improvement Proposal(s) According to a 2001 study prepared by the Corridino Group dated December 2001 and entitled "A Vision: South Miami Community Redevelopment Area Multi-Famil Housing Study'; the following three (3) redevelopment proposals were identified for South Miami Gardens: [Option #11] "New Construction Utilizing Existing Zoning of 18 Units Per Acre" • Existing Site Area. . . ... . . . ... . . . .. . . . . ... .300,000 Square Feet • Total Proposed Residential Units.. . ..126 Total Dwelling Units • Proposed Zoning. . . ... . .. . . . .. . . . . .........RM-18 (18 Units Per Acre) • Proposed Project Density.. . . . . . .. .... ..18 Units Per Acre [Option #2] "New Construction Utilizing Increased Zoning of 24 Units Per Acre" • Existing Site Area. . . ... ... ... . . . .. . . . . ... .300,000 Square Feet • Total Proposed Residential Units. . . ..126 Total Dwelling Units • Proposed Zoning.. . ... ... . . . ... . . . .........RM-18 (18 Units Per Acre) • Proposed Project Density. . . .. . . . . .. . . ..18 Units Per Acre [Option #3] "Rehabilitation of Existing Units and Complex" • Existing Site Area.. . ... . . . . . . ... ... ... . . . .300,000 Square Feet • Total Proposed Residential Units... ..58 Total Dwelling Units • Proposed Zoning... . .. .. . ... ... ... .........RM-18 (18 Units Per Acre) • Proposed Project Density... . .. ... .. .. ..8 Units Per Acre • Proposed Rehabilitation Items... ..central Air, Interior Renovation, Exterior Painting, Landscaping, Parking Lot Redesign, Security Access System, Appliances, Hurricane Impact Glass w 2002 Survey Results Following the 2001 study prepared by the Corridino Group a formal explanation of the proposals was provided by City of South Miami Consultant, Richard E. Miller. A subsequent survey was conducted of 41 of the total South Miami Gardens Households which at the time there were 43 Occupied Households. The following survey results were obtained: 78% of those Surveyed or 32 Total Households Indicated that they favored the Multi-Family Redevelopment Plan 15% of those Surveyed or 6 Total Households Indicated that they might support the Multi-Family Redevelopment Plan 7% of those Surveyed or 3 Total Households • Indicated that they did not support the Multi-Family Redevelopment Plan South Miami Gardens Summary update June 9, 2003 I A Vision: South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency(SMCRA)Multi-Family Housing Study, completed in December 2001 identified the South Miami Gardens(SMG)Public Housing site as the number one ranked site for redevelopment. The primary purpose of the re- development plan is to develop a mixed-income housing development,which incorporates public assisted units with market rate units of various housing types. The current development occupies approximately seven acres and contains fifty-eight housing units and a small school housing a head-start program at the north west corner of the site. The site is currently zoned RM-18 Multi-Family allowing for eighteen units per acre. The existing development has a density of approximately eight units per acre. The Miami Dade Housing Agency owns and operates the South Miami Gardens. The location and the size of the property make this project an important catalyst for the growth and development of the SMCRA area. The study analyzed three different scenarios: Rehabilitation of existing buildings, a development of 18 units per acre and a development of 24 units per acre. The last two options include demolition of all the existing structures. The first option of Rehabilitation is not considered a viable option and will not be considered any further. The other two options call for total demolition and redevelopment of the existing SMG facilities. At its meeting of May 12'2003, the SMCRA Board indicated its support of the option with 24 units per acre. This option will require the rezoning of existing zoning from RM-18 to RM-24. Further analysis would be I needed to develop a preliminary phased master plan with 24 units per acre, develop unit types, establish unit mix and study elevations. The Board directed staff to put together a Scope of Work for a consultant and a time line for this effort. The Board also indicated its support for re- establishing the street grid system as recommended by the Hometown Two plans. Demolition of the SMG would require the relocation of its residents. The Redevelopment Plan will provides the opportunity for the existing residents to move back to one of the newly developed units, if they so choose. Residents of SMG were surveyed to determine their level of support or opposition to the Redevelopment Plan. The survey was conducted between February and March 2002. SMG residents were provided a detailed explanation of the multifamily redevelopment plan and were given an opportunity to ask questions about the plan. The SMCRA Board has expressed a desire to keep the relocation_at a minimum and to the extent possible limit relocation to the surrounding areas. A detailed relocation plan should be developed as the plan progresses. The phasing of the Redevelopment Plan will greatly influence the relocation plan and vice versa_ As of March 18,2002 the SMG development had 43 of its 58 units occupied by residents. Two of the 58 units are out of management for use by the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Center and the Police Workstation. Of the 43 occupied units, (100%)of the households were issued surveys. There were 41 or(95%)head of households that completed the survey. There were 5% or two households that did not return the survey. Of the 41 head of households completing the survey, 32 or(78%) support the multifamily redevelopment plan(including the relocation implications). South Ynami Gardens Summary update June 09,2003 Page 2 of 2 Six households or(15%)responded that maybe they support the plan. The remaining three households or(7%)did not support the redevelopment plan. Project is anticipated to be privately fimded. The subsidy needed for the public assisted portion of the housing will be derived through the revenue generated through the market rate-housing component. Request for Proposal would be sent out for interested developers for a turnkey project to design, build and manage the new development. Based on currently available information, a number of very preliminary economic pro-forma have been prepared for the redevelopment. i Dols 1 = ';4, ,�i4���r 4,• •• =sc, io-" 5 ,. g @ {°o j t wsj s r Ilk ji Ij ML o �. o ;s�9 ; �'• ' `' loss ■-�c;:-a>�;.s���uJ,��� �:�,�:��� .�,::.�s-a���r.�a- —T� — . ��i� _a wwr�.r°a-:..srvv -�r.=r-r°� x iy^°F o y .................. isis LLL m O o ss 61 �-•jy ���. Yi Ir u■ s Vj o 58TH AV Ms '• �9. tit s ° ra < s 5 mg 05 aES s3as �+ �, alas `�15e �r•+��`��� ��:., o lees "a ART s N cZ sLa9 ■ lD � 59TH A LBaS p I 0 085 • = ■ ■ N 5900 iz • s • � �8s � a U . • ... i5 8165 L - • �2rs 0 9959 1189 N Z fi 1E65 tititi�yb� _ m m L679 e`� ■■ ..■ cA.... i 'h LO 000L 060L l 6510 OZ59 C 6969 Q 9665 5669 0 Ell 6A� y 0 •1 -f� co O o qtr ■ W o 69 2 a 6101 % r 0 Zl9 0 -9019 F 6219 + OM Z El9 6125 ■ lZl9 ° %••cm % 4 19'. :��1a 6169 ,%%by%%%%%%i///rp F/irY.YV�.�11/ ..�■!■■■■■■■�I logo tn��■■■�iiiitt�lt SW T T- ■ ^ 6ti5 YES o O u CT 270 �� OEZ9 � � �.�-�•� �} �6 ��/ 17Q 6291 LZE9 0 R 7mg� O �°% 6255. 6270 6529 6265 6290 SHZ9 3RD AV _ � 1 -Fi Ts . �' a�- �+jt , - . M o ""k,- FOOL o� Le 9 S 3RD CT ObE >6EE9 ey: o ru - 309 .[BE9 j 06E9 L8E9 -09E9 W9 m n SW 64 .�. oeyr.. m 1 m m l 1 SN 1069 r \ I ��(l1- /l'rs � t t !� y �� NAY � r � -• , ` I' ! ��� �,`.>j � ��•,y _ - �is Ls - ' 1 k�l l t 1 ;r it 7= L r � I `•I i ti. ? � ``Q <Rrm o 4 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN r> �`=5 SOUTH MIAMI z n z 5949 S.W.68TH STREET m °S:Q T SOUTH MIAMI.Fl. s r 4 f lila , ' Y i s r . IF r vP f o> Ka t r "" -nl I6' 77771 f l � � I. � T1I � R7 i' xr f• y �� t��Vl f fi�?S.}� I I p CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN -_� SOUTH MIAMI g s i z o� 5949 S.W.68TH STREET w'm °M : " SOUTH MIAMI.FL =ct CITY OF SOUTH ML4,MI NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARLNG NOTICE IS HEREBY given that the City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida will conduct Public Hearings at its regular City.Commission meeting scheduled for Tuesday. November 16, 2010 beginning at 7:30 p.m.in the City Commission Chambers,6130 Sunset Drive,to consider the following item(s): An Ordinance of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami Florida, amending- the Future Land Use Map of the South Miami Comprehensive Plan by changing the future land use map category from Multi-Family Residential (Four Story) to Low'.Density Affordable Multiple-Family Residential (Two Story) for properties identified as the South Miami Gardens Apartments located at and specifically legally described as 5949 SW 68 Street (Folio No. 09- 4025-063-=0010) and 5961 SW 68 Street (Folio No. 09-4025-063-0020); providing for severability;providing for ordinances in conflict;and providing an effective date. n /I SW 66TH TER ; -- SW 67TH ST a. a� Ss t h SW 68TH ST SUBJECT PROPERTIES 3 X311 i ALL interested parties are invited to attend and will be heard. For further information,please contact the City Clerk's Office at:305-663-6340. Maria.A Menendez,CMC City Clerk Pursuant to Florida Statutes 286.0105,the City hereby advises the public that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by this Board, Agency or Commission with.respect to any matter considered at its meeting or hearing,he or she will need a record of the proceedings,and that for such purpose, affected person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. ?roperLy tntormation N1ap Page 1 of 1 My Home Miami-Dade.County, Florida MIAMI E Property Information Map k Summary Details: F k Folio No.: 09-4025-063-0010 Property: 5949 SW 68 ST Mailing MIAMI-DADE COUNTY Address: MIAMI-DADE HOUSING Y AGENCY $W 66T1i rE ' 1401 NW 7 ST MIAMI FL ��.. 33125-3601 Property Information: .� 5W;61'f3151':. F 800 MULTI-FAMILY Primary Zone: ESIDENTIAL LUC: 047 DADE COUNTY Beds/Baths: /5 Floors: Pz r4 e « ' b Living Units: d'S Foota e: 5,072 Lot Size: .26 ACRES ear Built: 1975 5 54 40 3.26 AC PB 102-19 UNIVERSITY Legal DNS SUB NO 3 TRACT ,. $ Mb", Description: C'LOT SIZE 123554 SQ 5W 88T4i STS + ' T Assessment Information: Year 2011 2010 m p.. �v .+� Land Value: 1,124,700$1,124,700 ry3 Y Buildin Value: 1,481,383 1,499,442 Market Value: 2,606,083$2,624,142 - = 'w Assessed Value: 2,606,083$2,624.142 Taxable Value Information: Aerial Photography-2009 0 152 ft ear: 2011 2010 This map was created on 11/17!2011 4:26:15 PM for reference purposes only. Applied Applied Taxing Authority: Exemption/ Exemption/ Web Site©2002 Miami-Dade County.All rights reserved. Taxable Taxable Value: Value: _ Regional: $2,606,083/ $2,624,142/ $0 $0 County: $2.606,0831 $2,624,142/ $0 $0 City: $2,606,083/ $2,624,142/ $0 $0 School Board: $2,606,083/ $2,624,142/ $0 $0 http:Hgisims2.miamidade.gov/myhome/printmap.asp?mapurl=http:Hgisims2.miamidade. 11/17/2011 f p i \ SJJ. � •. / CYs Ox p f ca N Ito e (; c 5,} ! i�� '�� ,,. 5 f� -.s�' � ''a•Y A-._-SST, F t'i��!^ � _ �`� � 4 N. �� ;•. 5 of • s,, f, � _• � '� ,1.�� ��� ,\ tF '¢ ) �°�J Lys ' ✓ Dr � �ti w I I ti•i— w A' \ �1 -71 tit a �s lJ , i kJ:. " �• 'Ste,` ' 1 - ppp r ' :E I tsn o:E CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN SOUTH MIAMI 5949 S.W.68TH STREET w m$ O s T SOUTH MIAMI,FLT 3 S $ �,- i� np G :(7 ®• �xf �ty'�ki•�S tytli�'s sq j y3 `�t - �-a r( "r' ��� -�h1 '�. 4— r�' i�'��y �. ..} � AIRh.�,. �L rKwy+�Al'. � r,+�� ,. �yl'•�fr 1� d z�}z rY �i •,tills5•'�,., Y Y L1 •c"F.� - - =ill•J��j' �i t'�'.;�'A t`} ?�fi,it t ,+ **,ss, Yr rf''+i rt„g,'•�" C: 9 eft-,., zti >.}r}t,, r + e i ' x ���f J+ 1• ri�+�J� h L� r r �j f` Y i .�;� s� 6 sit I �4'1a"(�l �'1� .1,�l• t rb � t y�' �y,��. . - r�` k�j e�-+,"r th'� ' he�;�',.,,. y?�, ' ��✓2nt � i'.-� a';.�'r ��K��, i{i '�> a4 1�1d �t�-F' ��J1} � t� Y¢. "� a ��,f,! tik� ��.5 Ana nil a, rt �'� ,figi�.'�t• i �', u t '(t Itf�7°�? � 9'r�'�J 1 � r •ifP t'�e•4• I< f �rJ� ,7 F '� •r ��Ni •�P+fl. ,y� C���. tf i Z� r w A '1G} >>E r - _ yt, r{t� .1�'+,t �. " sr M S's•'n?i 5 Sf 1ti , n!'4•Laa'41rJ , `'Afh FI , r V t��ir Iy,yyI�nt(� j�p xrry MAN cyZC w y r��t P�t)Yk��t•'`T{k,t!�� ;� L}1 r�t'R tf° 4�R`M1r dz� i 1., � �.�� S•l? s.y �ti,�f. as �. Fit ,�' a x 't .+� �•f 3` i rI 't � t i, �t n,/ fs U «:`'�Q'��1� h''�� ��'1"•t•`��f i'f+l''��.� � „�7. °,�.�.E� °'ir% ' i,tk: ��' �E,�•Q•u}'- �d �'rz, .a; {,'K�K�YY;a ftt tt11,7 r +C rr 51 F r gi X, >rt 5f+'1;t �i.�' .}"ri a�e71,�1 1."ra''.a prs a i (t 3y.. , �!-,. �'tir, - ai✓',.ffVt�IXr Nip .r `., 4 ej E:-, r"j•or•`'�i. �L z T Y Ls'+ 'ZJi'{� xT ,s t' �] pr 'N• Ir"Y1 f'�5��u��u.�•' G;—�'� � ` 'tTTr. 012 Gr `.��r{b�'�,),,���..1I,,Y�I �'L.L.��4 "4r�, r-r,�1,r1�h� n is ,}� r P� a.,Y •�`sx e r ��Sa�� 1 ,•r 'Y_ x e )s� ,tih L t 1 JY4 A- h,r' y,��M�1��Y Y,] �.at,, i _ �f(, has •� ,,,,� ���� �', ��' �+ { r il. +*-t°•i� n ' .f1a'�t• t _ _- +� �r:�'�{"'r, 1{ ,sli ' 9 a't..i���.p�c+,�h rr �'f •. �4, ;i '� - �gryF'��1�nr,r5h 'fj 1 Y�r�,r$1`l,. r � .•'a olti � jYIiY t a�i"°T� W '1+t4r! tY}R '7 , °n�r .:,•� r� t�s' i �' d�+ 7 3�` "Yi t�� t. �',gah r 61t f�,�dt �.;;,,����'�y�'An ,� lvt� 4 7 � J !r 1 }s 41tY, •hr+� ��Fy '• �,}a. - Ak 'r���rl�� +c,`. .A,t- S �,�.t;.r.,� .i d 1''.. �,r�'i'�,. .`t �i ` .,•il. r j. i. QIP c 7 A f S �» �iL11. °�" � }•�S}�`4ty{y 1y,,. s }v h rin '�,•�1�.,1f ,r'�n n�+ ��.�;.ry� �} F t"z r it t ' z'`ilt{� �,at1`� "b� + r�� 'r� ✓;,did ��;y ,ia'•, �w>5 }i Y-11a Irfj IT f i� if'�1`a {•p• � }YF�``Ir � l Yt J'�1 �w` �� x r r k '.i� >"i JI.��h��t#1'�Ffi r� L�k� �y� � r � '+i"O'i - •^. 0 �} l w. Lj.l a;+i(r i 1 1`4^ir ro'Fl t. "C`4 t�b i•S.f t �l'91�,�ti� �,,�r Y-f�.f �, � �a t i 't-w (,1 a ��, Fl�?r'`� t'1 Sx, x,�6 x �T„'. �u t (t'dt''• � t •��, -,+.� �. � 'l. 1 `t f yi r 4 tr4� z , ' nR P '� ,• ,f,,'i t k�, ' r"• ' s,,r '�', rt lr -• Yr 4y , I�� LL� r'Li,+t tt�Y^ a�,r y _�n' -57 k.} 1�y�y �� � t�•' �. ��r��y '� �a OOL9 ,4 114rAt�! +'• v+ t1't +'10 "-' v'0. •1:• g v°o r ° 'NS[ Eo K A i^ 't ••L lESI Sy J6Sl C' v0 vi. 1 50 i 1 1 , 5 0 ° 7 ssSg + i••.;' 11! loge . •�••••----• "d'iJr.-u.�i"'"�T�i,��,° e:k;�c; ° s`�■Ta"A■.enx... ".�'ilk i��';al a■"fi' ■.,e° a A >:■Y■ •iii ' 1 6059 0eh O( L •••4 S��Wt1i® ri s a 3 k 6069 '.,•,�+ ,n �x ' o ■e e e e■■■e e •■■e e e 4 2� y&v, :t x� aFiez, 2 uo a LSLS ^'S14v.r 11•F,. roe F 6 3 ,�E S1L5 ,Ya SW 57T c i o t ''vim 111%, A/ ,3 ;%A/° °TH AV° ELBS 6< �. +. f' �L •°TM � St 58 NR ,EG, 9 ,pf ° to S68S i 6305 ZE9 6345 ° BSBS Lees m m m 12 h 19E Ong Lies a SL99 ti 4 1� 59TH A • ° lass L. ■ E3 ° 6 6 O85 . a _ ■ n 5900 ;ZS 7.Lfiq °ZL S ig N • ® . : dig ° CBS • �. i5 8165 it • • eel I■ S 9999 lLB9 �• g 1569 •• A. N..ssolARt1A■Ah °°/LC %%%%Ah R _ W PL _ qq 0001 0601 � '2 6510 Use �� d 1 . h1 3 ° � 6565 69 5665 6001 6400 ��s-�6CU`LI 009 –4 MAP 0 69ft r W r 0 . a�'�'61� 6101 j Ism A o .1 Zt9 0 _Goo H 9 a Me -F.619 � Cl9 6125 � .-nw^i' ■/ a LZtB L-1 o..OfiiB % qbtq LE01 r 2 11p p�4�... fi169 + //////■////giiidiidi SW 9 7' d 6400 o Eo 0 0919 g c 6169' o ND C4T e� 270 OM = _ T�loi LZ9 6291 tZf9 _ 0 g 6255 56270 6529 6265 1 ^ ° i S8Z9 9 1629 LOE _ .• 63RD AV G. I000 o (o oi. RD C 0 "T+ ->x COOL 1� iS r8 m ,•co ''� jn' Of£9 f££e 0�m o ° 6 g 3T ° 6E9 3 AA 33 ° sees - .., ob � o o N Me 4_5 T 19 10f9 08E9 18E9 tD N o ° 5W 64 4 W 0069 1069 1 �ICO1A �_u �� i� i'° 6, .r---'+—' • m its r 144:w.gA:�}:4A.tiA}.R Y.�!1;.,.,./lMA.4:.IJ.I,hW.,4►M./[JGw•..N4rr_M.t:M1P w.r.4•,JryclaAC1YM.,,M4„�,•,KfR1I.�.,�,1i.irliYaM•a:ia r y FN ;r rr o l Ill?'. .�� 1 ty k :.� .{• g r 1 t �F. x+� :1. tt l8 1Q ;1 I?s St r; !� 2rd '.2 i8 I:ri !Yd'd+i �--...,...�.is. Rlt/.9'.r -�•=`i� , �� r V "M HI r-q MS IDoi PBSP (. '?ili t�'Wv;' i I Si Rios I u65 I 1 1' f >r, :v1:•*'! je i„�1 � � }1 i 14tH ^o,I ,2 F 6.I[9 1 ' I+.• ”! 1 'iF u --.�a ,., A• ,. rrw -,s �{ x It .�'. r- fir 1 r F , q" F r' r �!•. I:b':.^,w'� �� 'rl I ' I,w.'[��I �,o�f reG'y ,�1� ,,t�F�� �-1'�Ar h•'D l,lti i�, .. 31n!G(iTl 4:'t ws _ I r r F i Lo I ili ' �ti�r '�I.,ew.. ri ; b'• • •;+ 1 r { t' �y l` s I;a CA14 oil , y r CIO !�r Ij X419 61ED ma ._ �., � ..: ., �� ., I v �'I> yr I�, ..!k I. �' .,, ��'•� r. ,,,. lw _ _ � 1� tF, r�• � !'_,: � e tai �� r� �, Cd ri eroperty Information Nlap Page 1 of 1 My Home Miami-Dade County, Florida MIAMI E u4a aay r - Property Information Map W Summary Details: t Folio No.: 09-4025-063-0010 Property: 5949 SW 68 ST r Mailing MIAMI-DADE COUNTY Address: MIAMI-DADE HOUSING AGENCY 81h1'88TH TE1s4 1401 NW 7 ST MIAMI FL 33125-3601 r y:�y« sY may ° Property Information: .�Viz; ,• Primary Zone: 800 MULTI-FAMILY ESIDENTIAL w .r LUC: 047 DADE COUNTY V Beds/Baths: /5 Floors: Living Units: z a SYM Bpi 87 5,072 s' Lot Size: .26 ACRES Year Built: 1975 t 5 54 40 3.26 AC PB Legal 102-19 UNIVERSITY Description: DNS SUB NO 3 TRACT LOT SIZE 123554 SO ;'i1Ai 84TH 3T-� Qfi'� 4c Assessment Information: Year 2011 2010 Land Value: 1,124,700 1,124,700 Building Value: 1,481,383 1,499,442 Yf► .. a� Market Value: 2,606,083 2,624,142 SW��IFT�1 gT�`_ _ � "�,e,,� �,, •� �n,;x Assessed Value: 2,606,083 2,624,142 Taxable Value Information: Aerial Photography-2009 0 152 ft ear: 2011 2010 This map was created on 11/17/2011 4:26:15 PM for reference purposes only. Applied Applied : Exemption/ Exemption/Authority Web Site©2002 Miami-Dade County.All rights reserved. axing Taxable Taxable Value: Value: Regional: $2,606,083/ $2,624,142/ $0 $0 County: $2;606,083/ $2,624,142/ $0 $0 z. City: $2;606,083/ $2,624,142/ "p $0 $0 School Board: $2,606,083/ $2,624,1421 $0 1 $0 http://gisims2.miamidade.gov/inyhome/printmap.asp?mapurl=http://gisims2.miamidade.g... 11/17/2011 CITY OF SOUTH 1VIIANII NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY given that the City.Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida will conduct Public Hearings at its regular City,Commission meeting scheduled for Tuesday, November 16, 2010 beginning at 7:30 p.m.in the City Commission Chambers,6130 Sunset Drive,to consider the following item(s): An Ordinance of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami Florida,amending the Future Land Use Map of the South Miami Comprehensive Plan by changing the future land. use map category from Multi-Family Residential (Four Story) to Low.Density Affordable Multiple-Family Residential (Two Story) for properties identified as the South Miami Gardens Apartments located at and specifically legally described as 5949 SW 68 Street (Folio No. 09- 4025-063-=0010) and 5961 SW 68 Street (Folio No. 09-4025-063-0020); providing, for severability;providing for ordinances in conflict;and providing an effective date. - �� SW 66TH TAR SW 67TH ST CL v_ S'dd 68TH ST SUBJECT PROPERTIES 5056 E?11 3 ALL interested parties are invited to attend and will be heard. For further information,please contact the City Clerk's Office at:305-663-6340. Maria M.Menendez,CbiC City Clerk Pursuant to Florida Statutes 286.0105,the City hereby advises the public that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by this Board, Agency or Commission with.respect to any matter considered at its meeting or hearing,he or she will need a record of the proceedings,and that for such purpose, affected person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. R I >.{y ` ,.M._ l � �'!A' .•�� _ �Fly-i--�7,�a��*li' �1 f ir L CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN SOUTH MIAMI i z 5949 S.W.68TH STREET s: SOUTH MIAMI.FLo o D x° rr 4e9'+R'�;R�q:i.N.Lr_�,re.AA:,R•.4rpWtW:iynfai'W,.vn1NaA:4:1bA?:.w44F�iFN...n:O;N#Y�IkLEt',N'at5l lr:'Y+.t KMWirNI4rtlEtr�9aaPni4�ll Yfli.NrtlL hEOJif�.@i4.RrRa9:1L'PSY,_frAE:WSO:LiG� ' � , rl� , t. ' { t I •�-r'!.sr ,�' ,E s I kill' J� yt� �1k� �(t'K � -�" �• co! y t1r J6 �����I r"i"s y�A�`i53z��Y4 � t � s :- 6YJ6. EMT, 1"JHIt}1 Al 16t8 UN j•os Idly •t y ! � � 'H fllb5 i 6to p- `',�t �us4- � � �1 ` - - - Y - !r' .F 1048 ��. � I i�yro- I I ....1 '� - -- 'I.,,c.1_ >Esf�.�..4.°,._•J. i..t Wlife r - - II JAI rtlM"F1! x165. rS 4 4 1 {.0906 ' ,r C . € a'1Jyla�F�S '���' .1 Ib' ��� '� I �• 'f 'c1 �'ryt7r,�s II�I�EI. •••o a.En. .'1?pu�iri i W i`ft ld;.v.�a N an N N• . ,N • .o w N•m..NN.N m e...+w -m r.Nr.N mi.f 1 .c ♦ ,. ...L €: i14 Us Z. s;III 4' p •f' it A fit t Pill ti V .'4 .+r �E4� 4J'f( � 'tr,�1 Yl' �' � �n .f r1:� •'fit, ��� •J,rN' 4 ll•r� •:1 J r 'Mr PPT ii'i r J �J'•r.�iA I � r p�t ,�,� I�� ,,, -� fix+:� ��x ���'r}.� ';• '� "'�-� 7 .� ( �� li•.fir ." 4 ,,'.,1�r �,,, .�� >< �r- '.t �1 cd `Yr� ' ��"Ff•' � ( 1�I t r' 111 ' �' f' ~''y*, L�. r .1 ' i'•.+ r M ,4 y rpT'+r 7 J rF Jet( To '4 �`� '!I y5 rrl ,'�^ yr. � ,11y[•. i ,�. 3.' ^��C'f�,it•�! ,� tjCfj` �' f„`•r L' i n ,. ( �' �-,. * •1+ ` r iq Al � �T�,Ir ".•Y .I Y�• � T `Sl�j�� �Plu � I..a -�� '�. .i, � N�'�tI$ �� �� ;��+ {• � � S^'[Ott , ( ( �- �. -- 1-• r. yam• ��, r_ i � r;t � •�;r �f'e��4"'F•�t�''.. l, -tlt'j�1' •:�.1 ,f�l.{ � t;.\ � r .r ''t�lA t��+ ti--~ �{ •'ii'�„'i'�,' + 1 t.�.t �J�'V”?.3ry !f '� '1 L, ..S� �� i '�.,� 'i{'t7:q, -1 Y ( f r •!� '•S• � tf'' b f,..i Y�; Fk. .sZ '1��,. �^ 'j.r- ��rf. ji F K� j• ,...nr �(•r:'i.. a'�F� }, C"• '�I' ( t +'�' y-: 'ry:� ,. �e(�,t 6 ,f 'Y �• ,• t. t '{-� r i l w? °S�' `i'tt�.S�. _ k:�, ! ���' h r�.t r. a �•t . d- om LC91 t'^.t yf +rat., r l� •'f''Oyu''. •t °�, :•'� t y ° 1491 {, f. s.+.rc d ',• v{ f'` ``r�`'ik� •}• 1 C •41 1099 '' �t .`_ .�jg":� r5�'� 5r, i�rrta air.■�ie.'...:.a�t��"fi"r�,'c;d �"a�a■- ■a r "L■"7s a„■� s 4059 OM 0Q' o s 409 •,s �� ks '� b . }roa■■■■a■■■rar■■■■ by < ham LSLS tf,'y, '•,t met y' s "� v Stlg; `. qq 1 m B m e 't 2s N 57T G I p (hiithl1 :+•, Y m uyf m m �� sr - i .v tt .iy'q, •r"`"r` 58T UPS AV m _ UPS •.� 61s,$,✓d;'q■,d {, ,� L ■ "vim 'ky ,! L. '•Y .,:3.,,,w.... t a...rrW v"'i ®■ S4flS a ■ �'. r 6305 ■ m C ��■ �� . RFRia ZE9 6345 ■ Efa m 8585 �"c��''+ 111 ■ °°� LEC9 i { �� f9 r Sl ■ m ,n rip!11 a.:r 1 .,�: 'Les SLOG 'Y a us m 59TH °AV LeBS ■ a o � o offs L 5s00 " o ° zlsC (C7F i5 9 69 L l ° • lisp is- ;° 9959 o. 1189 N Z G L 09 F '� = `O as ■ rA ris�w lg�oi %%%%%%%- � • � " e � � 000L O60L d ° 6510 OZS9 3 s � � h�•, j.3 � 6965 ,. w av 1 � 9665 966 9 0 909 • W�- D fte R o �o 7 E0 6z" + 0419 - El9 8125,,.�.m �r -°'°' o ■■■■ _ IZlB "1 ~ � £� n 2 llB''•- +b^1a � � 169 as »5 6 6 tE01 2 ,q,th4�Y4�49t4�Y�d1�d11ir�iOd dd —ps a I I 1 0 0 x A a a v 01 a r 0 I a a I atm-pli#rldd SW 6169 ?' d fi400 0 F 08L9 S `°al c� .1ti-4169 E is 270 ¢o OEZ9 = c r� _r CZ9 6291 LZE9 l° e ayy� s E6 6255 Z69 6929 6265 ] 6255 .6270 ! $ .n 6290 SBZ9 qw- 9�16Z9 10E9 6381 Lb m m . 3RD AV 0 a � '^ 1f ee 9 . o � ._ . s Bees °js9 ° 5 3RD CT 04E9 osees , R 6 ° '�y 631 12£8 ��""" � ts L[E9 d I yy i O8e9 m LBE9 06es IM 18E9 09E9 l N �� - svv sa a a04s w4s �, ° ° ° °Ell S 6126 oflls s m 6715 c $ ... Y rA it4 r < ti ya s' El rtrrr r astir i F�Lyy r r F ,,,) rl�E. ri 5 I 'L, tt,,,r•.� 5 '!r '`ti,r I �•�%ro'i�.` �Lt �f"�''.� ,.c,,�-��f�il.� ,"•di(Sf'� x�� T r.1 t 1'r,q i�q �r�' S S,•� r 'r' y t F'l�c��,M' ti u5' r�_��� �`�S—t�'{.°.i.� ayl(:�dN r 'wnx• r ri�µi"S!�s, +F,• v* J q .,> tsy.{ fia�rs,•f4. r>'j�},i� 7 5�=:I��,igt�T !t tf��� �i r�,•r�^ j7 ! .. r° -r GUR ..a•+� tyt t - F „t4I�4 f7•+j t�l+.rd i'` yy<s�+,� �Ir ��f��Ai.r'` ,�.�j`�'�`r��'yr "(t{I'��"n?{ ��� �If ors{-�r � �� �t�f I( � �f�'?�`1 �� •f!t��yl ! ��'�ro4 � �� ! � can C �•, W Aj,1•����'yla� ��t r !-�+`� rJv '''"�p�. "6� a �� S�S�.k�'1 l��aF 44 {�'y� r'``���t^ 7'S.'.! +/' ° - ,�, Y t� �r ltr e E.:•C t •r:�'` P9RAt' f i�f 1 3 art f V'�lA w v". ! r• i r. I t� � ,r, �, .}d:, v9 s ti� ii r r ,� t ,4 s ,w• �r�,J•�1 z r t r5-, e t4 ��� �NCL 2}y.•+Gyn-L;+af�'�4� f �T3 f� 7�Y}$'�{' I •q, Pt id,�+`t'!b�� �'�,�'F�IE; , � r I�r U 1� k7z r�i •'Lain' � a.�sz�q{�i 4 - ���� i .l r I,�i -:Ly,;. tl F :�'��(, `�t :L#•*k r,�" �1 ��N �jt ��3 �'�;>qd ,�e�rrei ib�'7 t"��la r•,rrtr7�'��w p �7 I �' •t� 1.,1 tc 5. }(} I�• i - i �p far f�t� 1� s���[ �,{�'r 1�r�A �"Lr- _ tl;: t�kar. NP 4, ). �� ((,,�>F:i%�rLr"�`(LY a qKd 7"; � �jj• t h� j L!I i7�✓ r''�f o l N�f' ,�� Rr{�i7y � E�'i t.� F.='•" � 1,;� I�i�P R d � ��' _ ���•�Ir�.�' '' k ra 1't�-S'c ..��''ii ,,�i-r?'S.¢' fa � ,.� r`•:sY�� i._7 f': �� 'Y r: � ttf{J�i.`l�'�3 li -r sJ� J. .>• � y'3kft.��� `l,e�i•" s\ �1- Ll�'i;�la�` 1' �R•- � {r��rr��p i r �+� _ dry �� ••t �+TTt�!! �f r &'i� ti•�,�k Y' �iirr (a't - is as p r, �/ P + i .0 i, °7 .'t�•���4i7r� 'F }� 1� t Y�{rri nc y i�1!,Os:�i�f�Y�-s � s � r 0i+ft.t. -1,•,�'p Oil ;•t.,�*' i�� �� 5�'• d.�.�,h{ �!x7'�• � 1p�' pa y;L1` ( r�O ,;tr� ��i r ���"� ;z:�i �3' tK�,��A���' ` 'i1,i+�1rlr` '�z� � r i�. �( rif ,�t r �• N •rYY�j' y'i 1 7 y�)'��A'- .{>'t �>'7•�;.' i + S}xF��C b -� �•O ` '' �ak �+rr� +.r fir- { �e 5 tE• y .�lC �� t yi` +1 fd! it p'+,r( � ,f t ,�! � ��• ref �{� � ! rr<�t� n j �` a '� ��� �... y'r<'i t• [�5x �.tt17t.� �1 :x' i'�n �•a1M1 tt + 1jje�R;yy��.N•�t°gyp 3 her �. .SF ]�i 5t �F;� �:4'�rah �.�r� •� l �Y � t r � �rY l't {a tli,Ir � rt •• is - i > �L " .R r't rr�" i. M�(, 4''',,'`k`l . k F; "� •.-ff;,f'7a ;i�'R +t�' ;'I .{l.. �ti ;�'t '�'. }r�� � !r}t 1 f i,•, tt '��lyx.�,��"� �i�1f4'c �s� � ��s5� �t r i k �'lyy".y,{r r„..�•! �r. I ^�! I � ¢���. •� azh J j�4 /q,r w� l 7�1{I 1 t7 ez V,4+ rs 4 Ec is �_5�. 4 13q{J��yp a �'p �u` t �,� �Gp- r f8��t,��1; �s..• V �4,drld'e �;� j ai�l,;r Fi � � rih��` +J:�',yt� (l�t �i�. ii �Cirr sL°�t • r ��.>`I` tay 9� x rt i� P+ �a�arrd �`al I •. I``. F}mil Fig } 71C� 'aS r� �tY,1{. •cY�i.'t .54.r�...a�3 �� �?Pl rrr i i+(� �M ya �•41� y } �" "'t .e ' r z' r !u+ P 9 < . ae^p s�,j ! f�*�4 ft•+� �v''� a4�xdsr �i''�+'p � rf 1 { �irr�¢� �°aA'�,u�rdt,{�vr��rck• ht �+ �, r °'�' a k,�,>,f ..: r Y 1jy � r R�. >•t f�i/{i y� °'y a'r r i',(Y-ta r!�C•ft ,? i Ur ,r, any t,. is'f a �. /r � +iti d{.•fE fh ^J+3; ri�t,',�.,�• 'I �d.rr"� lY � 'r �r� N^' +fin. }iA r r •��,,,�r��' "� ! a,r 13`�f� r,¢r ° � 1 �>{b-}' � �'' �Pryl��tr��t�'*�� r `I u'!�''i �iC+ �r c + �s�� i�i �.7-''^ t� •��Ev r`°�.i. ey, (fir•i a�{�' � � 55 !t a iA �� a•Ze` �'°'� 4..+ , ' ,_i .�-�,�.rrt, y.r�� ?RW t,1l r�i rl�e �� r � t abr��i�.Iti .y �. i✓y�`f 'z zi a+�; a - If{�f�, :sJ �; f �S{„� rc'h��T ..i1�'l�t.�}.fit +?c..r�:f•r.y�.'�1�, `ry I. � ;�ir� . 6• :�OOL9 I .. N, ' d - y �.1 its ky,s�f � s �4 .•� �� rc � � �G LESL 1U 't� 'r-. .;: Q O •� o �'y, 4* ''i °th 4 ] J. h 1451 � �¢ •�" �t �4,i, 4:11,65,� .._.� 0 1099 __... r s6 K;r•■+ s.■r. '■f°T■kG.....4, "'.'": :"i.■`si'V h r q �i Fe ��tllY� 4059■ OM .5. � �� s zY, 'rqi e z OR, tM IS Hi 57T IL r, 4"i ELKS 1? 6 Y..•' O i s L. LLj c a 8TH AV a `•• `mss d �f"``# Vii•. °�, titi jL Fl� Z Sivas l 6305 ZE9 6 ° y f3rF■ .,. ° LEL9 a oes o — a m a r ao � �i LLRS ■ a SL9S ti� R n y ur e 59TH A m LaBS u■ s m 0 ORS 04 • m 5900 $., m ��9q��■,�. ° p®p� LO ■ ■ ""' 5YR' u°i CBS 0■f■ i9_n 9� -Ug LL 9959 a UR9 $ N "'S _ 1949 0 Pl. ■■�. ■ Nm.mmm ALIL ti+64ti7+S4�. LO 060L r'3 F m �`° m ham•. �3 � E 6S6S 9665 S66S D09 'L. .r`ft`F am 0 f�t. w o 69 �" C :S0 a 0 6101 d o $ Z19 I sots F r ^� 6ZL9 '! 04L9 5 r kk, ti Lag ll9 ,�b .a _ 6169 L£OG ,q�h4ti4.3�6—b•S4LfiPddd�d Pd+Pr■l Yd�dl d .a.i°!°7°.°°°B!°Y°°°°°ii°°�iriidd�diP SW X59 p�j 6400 0 !.o o81y �� 4169 NND CT 270 Q:. 0£Z9 o i_- GZ9 6291 LZE9 !r S o 'r/bsy _ 6255. _ X70 I i Jg 6SZ9 6265 9 16Z9 LOE9 6381 � � m L_� 6290 5BZ9 ,■ ° D AV f1 —91 0£fg ff ' OJyg S RD 0 .� £9 T .. _ 6 a 3 CT 4E9 3 w o ° sees ?p 6310 Iag $ a u 1 LCf9 � i 08eg-ti.LL11��""" .. L0E9 1 o6f9 0459 1° L9E9 08f9 19£9.cn e m m 64 ° 0049 LO49 o o ° `d 'I70 OBL9 . 0 0 ° ��n i °� ti 35 m 1 m as .a—r~r.rSN e 6:.11!1..w�,P:w�.1..r.t4a.PAlt�.wPWUn/F.I,.PiI4w a,+.RY•....M.4i/t MbY.•Ph.N.Xr MAP.Aiw.P..tw.Fil Ypww.,lswwi`.t�aF.a-.�.MJartw.w.Pa 1 b..b, r � � I�'til1.S.VI`, ir;d�t185h�`n--- OIB; 4I 1 > n anus , In ,31;V HI r.5 PA; _ rpps 41fIS 9 AIGi 1 u6s G� pi.GS GZbs .Y Z, ! bG(It IiuPt L�GS1G GZsJ'ro'n .. -S:NGtr�rl•�11. I �s 4a 1279 1 g .faNf 'IY i � �'A,�: U .1D LL .. .. _-l•,^L-! , 1 _ I.p tg 4.L9 611;9 t1 I C' �•- •- :i, Sri I �, � •:- �,v II N. 17 '�' 7Y ( `'�; i ti I �. J: J fA G1 J! WO ti y« yi I� ✓I to f� ;r, a. h '� F�. 1 CL } L ••5a R. �.' � ... JI J 3' r� U° � .r w a o. • + �Cd P'r' �1�r'r�a�i4i .rrk I,l"y� rtl � r �I- r f c .h 'f•r t � �'{/� '��`�'3" Yd f{t „1tS^. J t fl fi'3=}}`�z. �:: '� ,.:fir }-3�}� �,� ' � Lt• i� f �t'1,�'k;��k+I a” i��i�sz I�,i*r"1. \- �� \4 a^�.�a �r ",y ry�'r•��' ���' 1 6 u,����` .�,���i�n+� g ���If'} '•Y�%z . , :' 1+'r'k�,�f�r, a"f't': 'I -!!''r,}L3SnEi'�SF' .+f tF Ij'f F r tf• + e I t 04 rt 11-s.: v �.�:.+ y iA`a f�'✓ 4+.. :.�i � �'�2:E'z+'" a i.�,r� n S 3 � j,,�r'1, � '$1• ! K r t•*bt'}@ ;; F{+1 .° yi I i�R,}��r�''f.�'!i;,e 1�.t�• +� �.i� {l�r!.y '� �'.� ht4..�� T � 6nEa {1 1 jfg; �a q :���y'��� {"� d�r+•�rL'117t�,{,(�R'tz+� �9n rt Lv l�' i�f�s�- �T(' '„r,„�. "`•�z r �'4da d+' `1i i u i�' ���.s,-�r y>:•'I''}'I i i1;��}�u+Y`� �:� '•' �'. � 3YrN�• .'�. ii 'M T,,'r { flg C'1''FF��l!a} � f}'�Y� .'"'r •"'y„�, `J i z 1' 9 i, Fd r e�af .rf��jM}�w•G Mr�I` 1�- •� � {'. �777�yrj,�k� ��a a' s" }:�' rti� r'a•�,�"►' B�Li� {.. I� >"+� �S�r a�' �,!',r>x.""""_s,,. l�;.tl�i,�hy i;yI3 r� ryF 1,.• 3 ' ,!CSr'Q}, It �yrj• ->r9' {I •j n,,{r�tr /+3 � a,A f„u) t\ t {` d "EE 11" , jN'}- z•g" r 'r �j nu f, a , s Rr .( '�`ir,�•�GC�,,yyf .2'.r I i V' °`l y Ir 3fr'4}�.i ♦ 1'+ )* P""�,� r11�'-A"°�'V - fix. .�!y� k1�? 1Ti Cr yFy$CC�z zt r a P c.p It�.. �.+C') Y�1'° �''yx:1• 1 I iL� � r �t na tz a �z sY VI{yl V���,f��,$i �' > 'l}"*n, 2 �t` �a + { ' l. s({�� u� If 11'('� ,�81' •d Y gf- YySyt�' �' 9 + �'t, i �•t' 'a 2,y�, {35 ' � ir4'< �33a•J s i�' '�ft#,afyr ggtN z t K 1 �� •�' y 2R"' 3 � � ,��,!3 e+L 1. Sl r S - ��v a r, •� a tf to r y r�,a�� m ry ^{ ` � ..hJ�".:Fi. 7 fi. �k��tJ � "" 1K^� +Lli� �' a ._ �(�c"�` ,��'( }•fat�b ` + �}}��f� ;sKf 7r l�, r .'�• \ 1 �Ym �ai+ ./ s� ,I i N� ti��.ri p}I.�,�.� i� 6� <zLr�•)�S' I ,�*�$` 1 'r �,�.7 �.��j r �}sr� Sj�2�i ar 'J��� (9A'�*' F �'a .'^Y �. 5,,�4° R •.S�:Jk � , ,l•�Sl�}������t�f ���'h 1 5_iY n'.F f' i �j{i7£t,b 1. t�'�� a7r.� � '�4 � - - + F �a �t�!y,rz 4�`;� �y,1g{{ �f=�`/s, �A 2..,,�,l�,� Lf r��-•h`.{l ofr�ll y ���.s i >��r t S ;5 Mr .+v,2iySS4 f� }1Y 11,19 qw- 1 - � ,, t ` +�,,�^Ill � `2yr� i''� 9� nY I�Ni,y♦• }-�. '2N + � ��� i L -s'�+„ 's* �} f i ' ' � �kL{ 1'H - � �. `��E' ? �.r��� r°s�,�Ft {"�t*•f S"4yy��'r�N•IlJfuq} .,Eye .wc' �'' v11 � r 7`yv� �1'� ��Fr �jR 'y °= ''y fns�EY�y���tn 7a{'� ° �i;ri }F�,ar•� irk ; pr$A'ph �fa�}1� � /.,� t r+�I> � �"r'*nj1z��Y�1 � �"��3 r 4 )✓�Q: Vat �c i r�l a 1 41 �� pi's S l+ � , r �� •�Y�M�; >•� � 'g u4 k' , ' �1 xIr 'J.ngA+u�"_° R} 1t}G �t� 2.� e"i � ;x f yi ",^}•.}f;�Fff.,,..�����J�?�1 L ,i(��f4�. i�;�3.,f 2n'sL^sr,�r��� ?�r-t�i r ��f ila�,,I�en.� �'+.r�, ,� II r:�Jaf�•I �1�1�� u�� i 4� �iI+�zz11r SP k�iK•'' 1 3rd r�s��Y�.// ri;s j� ,��1���r - ��i'Ea.f�{� II 1:�-A�'� -�xt�fr �y . �g���p:1F+�,�(fr� •L \• :•'d'r1I:Ff:��F y,.1�,/.d#� � ��f:. � I `�{.N�",.:'n' lt.lat F ��r. ..C' 1 `� R X ter"' -•" ?y f j � � Y S - ar I.l�°� ..*:a'a*r :�gY r'�a..,atk rJ}•`ti'iJi'' ::+c2f sr ...1` ti`. i I zd'.-d'f y IVGl 'i ! g o y � �- / ti ' sus 4S�sS ��il.�'' r4 ..,,; .6• i G Mi �. f 0 E� l s�9.r, vt •••t 1099 4: } • l aa. 6 bOS9 mog p t�ii t ��i �B m m � � O 15!S o vS}"s�1�v�it,' •m �' �.dz SI�S� =% t3 Z■,i 57T eo o w °..n a� _ t V�'vS�� h16�'�. '�-M1� r' •�a �8 j c e H AV h Etas .�t, g, ■ ''7 3 ,£b^`' 305 ZE9 6345 : o e BSBS LEL9 ....3` H ....: �S — {au. P_�.H°=■° It .,�. t . k e g o ^ lies ■ SC99 �ti■k–I 09 SW 59TH . 499 ° [vh j 0 ;z 5900 g ■ u / . { 8 fiS Cl§S. ig lr6S � d�' � `� 9959 � ::�° •., lies � Pt- `. 'd W ■ o �q OOOC 060L i 6510 OZ59 * 6 6565 9665 5669 1 0 6001 6A p09 0 nSt. . f�,f Co 1111 }'f F am 0 a, 0 •t9Y p� 6101 + o F n Zl9 !sots F o �■ 6219 + Obt9 m Et9 0 6 r�!_ !q. 0 4fi3i1 °■■■ 612 p _IZIO % ■� CD 1 ....a !lg tom °• ..,....... � 6169 .^• LEOC. iq�hyty�ty4yeytiidd,000000 tp a.�lt m i C Y 8 8 S 0 0 0 i i ig2+il old i�d� SW u 6100 i� o FS 0 OBl9 S� t ¢�-ib169 c 1 D CT o _ e • asa $o 270 y., nez9 2 n 4 5 �s+crva,o; CZ9 6291 tZfO yy t ��■ - 8 im Z69 `3 33t" 6255 1� R ��m °c 1•°n .° �.° 33" —+�°T'. .6270 6529 6265 � :6290 SBZ9 9 16Z9 10E9 6381 a ,,,,,•y`0O� `O$! �L Eea S 3RD CT Ob£9 0 0 N 6EE9 c'� 910 l 6 Z£g LL— ORE. tea $ 3 °9 t9es " t(.06ES "59 ]. 19f9 09E9 18E9 4 I SJJn4 ''`'y '9�0 Oob9 W09 o i o o S .ate j 6720 0elIT m ] ��-- `- ✓ • i ' 1:MSS4RlA:1.4M!ItR.N..R.NW.eIIRRY•J•rAJaY,JaR J..I�}l.•4�elSRA/3i�liJliu•Y4KY.Mf.eiYW.fa�JkA KNY..I�Ma•tR..s+YRJLafR.iRJ►.A:Y w:eR y� .P .r.,.it'ii3 k , �i.t 6{9 � � Sx• iw 1' 1 11 .1�,'i �i'.'o'f iii � '�.� y...- . ;–x+–'--�•-+• `.' ��:+}�.~.. _ � � M9S � � i .. a • ,�tgs Vol I KISS •.b ��:$ 1f I:ri 1?S .Yd'db _.w–..L L ' I(MiS 09$9 9i.A5 AA? / ''•.::3 ,:�f+�•J �f• � i •fb ;$ ! ZIri5 1:76S :K Z6 to 9959 �- 1 n� •.n iF' !t "," +I''G t 1 16 ti1 a ;'" Vi , a:;ffv' -6510 65991 ;r Yc i fl +'�Yi.•r cn li; Ri r ,rye �,, 'c;•rG(ITHPA: I 0%i �� u r 4 S � lidl'iS siBGs ,q +�� �.• ' 0969 u� w , E- og fdnn11Q 6119 » D!S19MS Wo i U- sse•a aua eeneawe Yy'34�„1_nr••ea•e eeeep ee Je • aee•aeawe eerae ae ea•M•••swan eareeAe• tl lif r , ' 09[9 CI49 •d I F�It.�L`.:1�. .� I r r. .. I..1 .. 1 V� v, 1!. l.. I C+, .'� i € ..O�' N •1, � �' 18 z fj tt ��, +,� h 1 6 ti ter` ,'ra, �. , A�. ar f �• i ,�.} ?4(`/f � fr. 'W��{1 �.r,�LifeLlL yLfit� 1.i•�.� t '� _,lrAV�..J4r ,j f �f'� 6'��K i'- Xj4 :R' , MY VAX (r ' �}i3.�' �✓ ry��•" 1 li:;,� .�y''.,r t ?y,�t}.t ,•7. {/,�hr/'d yya.' . �F 5-. { r�71;�q��_ >�'9i'T ,.yGjtr'�jy�r� y"•../" -•t } � �� F f✓1i:F ��5•i�l C4.Li`. � 1 •�'.Y`•�"M! I A�3' 4"'1'ay 'ki,. °z da• a �i 1 S °, >rr , 1(` a 14j kx 12`` iti � i,.r ! ' tyj M . .n •p'It f'ty,£r8r nl. t � , >?lto-,)ri�1Nl°� sy V `1' N' �1� y�.J''e• rYy .�. r_;%�`' Ks�t'a!} ��¢��I s� � °�•et_"� ��' }�.S {Y�_y4_� e A �V ���pZ 1 .,: ?'§t)n flS t.P Sr F+r' _ v'.ry}' �'r^'✓. g Bl(r�H�'C x{( r�( _3'{jpLt' � .)Y 1'•�>,. �Ir�r�+,� R{-rYC .� ,,g ly ••J'"'�•�j.1 S' t>7Y� i ct' d.�7'ir'' ` 'cF{rr �3� �' r, ��� V J & rA� t.o f'.�'., ^t�yta� ,.•.t•�`°3 e1y��,'{"•' a���G� , ' +{''J V.,' VJ4} ", w��q ,� {" r+r !d s r• a fl' �+'1' .try, ^� -.r��.',.\` Ai• , i' ,�, r k' I��h,,{ }/�7 1�,4 lI'f/ i � At � �{�•rl'��•M1��it � (.'�� Ali'"Fr:i'•�1. � �Y hr�j �il�`�If ,•„J �FF �'�r't '1r.� r�pp� '�F�971i T�� � ry. °�r �✓`rr 't r1�„(tt �!i,Y'rl r t Y„w r. � ?V� Y 'Y. 4u !`'' '�+M1`rr°h 3a 't Y•� ,4 1'�7fri :r+R r Jc� I ll ,!' r "T,.? 1;{�4f`t f t 't +FO !t•,1Y d^_ r�ts�r,j^rfl�!• A S '.1, ti�ncA.a 1�,�t t t � �1i'ti-. ,T�.+;•� 1 � ,Wt� �2 r••'� F � IY a � .-V a` � 'fir �l�3.�^� �'�1�r a r"St�W f �y�, , �rr•,/�1 � �V�aq}' 1�„ y � �;f iA 'r �,r'yy�i 'kQi��r i i J'ty�l -p� GG a-1�K� t � S /i�•5 �,+�.�F .r yltx" ,d. bfr Y,l �yi��j�r' I ,�5 Y+j '•. ���i�rurr2•,�_ � �� �3:af'��Tt�,q�� �f. rl` ,q`x•. � .� �r1 L� rtrt8'y JI'rj���yi { 1 k J r J ���i �err,;{3� ,sJ, ti�r��;� E':_td; t_4�c �1r - C.1 ' •�1 �r " 1141 �:; :�T 32F gs-,a VY,�• t t ,r I ° Z^" r3F all f ri��\*�°f�.e•�v ,a, i,,� r ��� � �^fir. ' k ,�r ��� r �4. ,.,'.. ss? r I MITI, 5rtJ'_ n� a , ry rY r tii r y'L[ tt d t v1�j �•�W.� �16� s- �tr+ G` �.�4�, ��� 'ri:�.nsi�r t�r�)I�-.1 i,tf k•'�r'(�'� I➢, �•S Y � -8.:���L ,r try S 1ti � f _ ,.�° �' .� .r �It1�'.�1.. �'n ,s's4u''f����4�; i��`I$d•1 >•"'S`�nr�Wdy� �'.,'' e� `�' ' j���� ��J� a e J �q 9�F'A, f�� _ ✓r{'�����}t - 1 Fgl�'L. sl,Y�,�`7' ,�+,R• t ht ti?�• '{ t 7.3r ,oa'� r' 9`d� �n��,Ja f-r a,�r�f� �'`�, t " "t �. �j', -f ���> �$ u'A �rL�}. Vr�7$��, I�r ee"QQ�y( ��h.�„•r s{ � ifii -.! ryT 1g 1�,;�. `y 1 �Jraf q Y 14 nf9y�t�� � �r�t —p`eN�yrLti f• sl.r'1` �?•� zi �s�.{I'. ��t>♦ 4i" :,�v.�� � �'�`�t {r? j t ���e'lrki ,} {.�., "Tr {, tk � t �� I y w ti}S 1i1 rlTr �}(� 11 { { tblr� 'ffr R ti t, I n Ix v rl )d<t'rt 49aAt- •D��kr',(3SR�ayi ti r � �r s.;1+( rya:$ wl{ u� 1 y 4f}•d""-4y z 7 U , t 'Y >. Y c'�F>r..r !r S o i % , { " Iry",t dr•`� ' jf�v y! F t dQr+d � �i'f "a'�''�.rj„ft���l�Y,�F p{{.tr!�•r r �r�„'��r �r�t,p��1 ���.1FP{+y*�5'.i f t �t '#•. Y e5�'J(n � �7li{.r `tom? ,ri•"I'}CFA {,+ �.�. r i',y a '•f"�';��1tr.1 "3��1�>�t( �� �',' a�k`ad t v r a �y ryVt 4� 3�aA #I rye n ,r "r r }�,;R•r,�l t�.�ts j(�: - .4 • ,} � 1 / U 7C; 3 !i`h ! M�tl, VN'� '1'r•`Y 4 I�t,i k'� 1 ' `G {'�'r�`�T� Y to r� 1 '-,tom ;_rsU �' '�e ', r;• �.i�” �t+_�r��� t i p��� �t�ikllr -r T�sr ��'�r I i•3 r• r �;�'y' t1l r' � r"'i,, 8� 'Yt OOL9 I .4 " ,Lei!! F 5 •.i` ,cyr,.v+, v^S +f. �• 1 i '�xSL .-,- V`'"�:'4' 3•,. +' _ r,gyp r ++w !i 1 .+x y U 1 �'skv". .+•.� Vii. 'j's ,!.,C�''i I - LESI �` .•;E' 9 s+'S„s .O� 0 4t j.� �` �j . I •- li '+�, '+.,+ .,��cx�J. YY �?.y ^," pip .`�- �' � i PI!b t �r Her +ny '•.+ i 0 ,,:...:.^ 'YJ� s�9:,. 4 y� 3.•xy ..•logs 1 a vwm D059 � °M 4.. IN o a 4 'iq zd o t ■' W 57T O 'i s( 6�1 tie ti 3 °m 3 ��` ��yl 'eiilvsvcic� 9 � S` 1''��,{•_ ��,YSIS '�F•. �'�� Y�, ,: �t TH AV i Et S f�s SHIT`� ,y,�•..�v". a i, n � y,p S; �. 6 h� sro99a w. . o° 6305 ZE9 6345 dd S9G ,o BSBS "�� ��' ■ LEL9 •W';','F y�r.�c�y v'� o SW 59TH AV 188.9 ILS v o oes F"N i5 • ca, ■ s z.8 �� 9959 _: ties a 1 1$L3 Z fi LEfiS n I S" 1559 ' .. PL ■ Naaasa i +b;tiRs4�`-'tl q 0001 0601 5510 0 G A . F a , . 6969 *./ h n NI •{ p�� 9669 966_9 0 6007 i 6A�� F���n ° •vi-. - i••� � d F i 69 �t W jg )q0i ° � -�'`� f� I= �" star P Ri r rear �qy ZL9 SOL9 H ,er+' d 'P 6019 m El9 6125 r LZl9 0 4l� ■■■.■Rei r 0f'i}1 0 LEOL = 6169 �4L9s749sLy47siddd dddddsP SW n e -p1Sm 6400 -o p ? o _ Ogl9 Y�$� b169 F r D CT 270 � 0£Z9 ¢ � � �•� _ C.. �,.'� �::�„�,`° ;.,s.+- 6iI LZ9 6291 y LZE9 mg 6255.� j5270 6SZ9 62fi5 6290 9929 A 03RD AV ; _ o� ._ -"`''` .FOOL gi S 3RD (i L OSE9 rG 2�9 6310 lZ£9 zz ° 1� � fS Lo. F_ L9E9 I O6E9 0669 19E9 19E9'u1 o - ~.o - S 64 '+° R f 2° O9 - -6716 �� '• }} �o C� <� o r r x RT:11A.. 1.0:0:4:1 AiOR4q:gtaxvxiat:!�Lmth:ilJL'FU'ga.gqA�H.J i+!t;bue SU:W`NN1kwCi?3;NY5it2�t:HAWril4Wli'wl+..J.lOiti�� YiUSJ"n;iv]q.'�.v[t>@Lx:s6.SCm'4Pem:FP'.P roi:n'd - R s ry v �j�y ,l I!-Iltart'ik --- -�'� �r•: �t' �;° a "d f y ,a«tFi 31,Vi1 I v1 + ( of Gd° if�y�l xfa eF ? ' a `LoS Ra9dsf A n s 4J�F$ fit` cars - ^If f Nlr,h;5 7 3iniS W6,.: by ;if e r't TA to ms IC �P6510 fi2'a3i.Jhya I u i�; r a =t luY r . k l.5"°. r)Nfl l,;I l p Y + .I r I MS ' . 19 al .� r'f ebb , M {,_,;.1 } ..i f .».1 1�':I 1411=r�_ 1L•. ,� - 5, i^ _ f, t o u JI Z t rs C ti y ` CC J 4 Q,. J d�l 2011 Universal Cycle-Local Government Verification That Development is Consistent with Zoning and Land Use Regulations. 2011 Universal Cycle-Local Government Verification of Status of Site Plan Approval for Multifamily Developments. 2011 Universal Cycle-Verification of Availability of Insfrastructu re-Roads 2011 Universal Cycle-Local government Verification of Affordable Housing Incentives Modification,of Fee Requirements For Affordable Housing Properties or Developments. 2011 Universal Cycle-Local Government Verification of Affordable Housing Incentives Contributions to Affordable Housing Properties or Developments. 2011 Universal Cycle-Local Government Verification of Affordable Housing Incentives Impact of Policies,Ordinance Regulations or Plan Provision on cost of Affordable Housing Properties or Developments 2011 Universal Cycle-Local Government Verification,of Affordable Housing Incentives Expedited Permitting Process For Affordable Housing. s s RraK M t wF dr OAK Am °�... v„ r •' U �I� A Ai �.i y • N 4 � } v. a" w, i y s - �M�� � x w a. � � ',"Yticl�e�rr r:.��,. � ��, �• ��1ii II ,•fi`� s 6421 ••• 6' 6454 650 &56 646', �' 6431 6d3<) a 6431 6433 '6431 6M u 5431 E433 U .. �v 6124 6`W �' Q 1 boat 6423 : ba8t ? 6441 6403 543Y 64 v iQ 66d1 6dL; 6.541 6443 643, E5L1J &151 , 65?Y 5501 *Ef60 "; bSGt 6533 6501 6511) ) 6301 F, 65115 6500 "., 6576 �3.W9. 8 651e r 06517 6570 » 6511 8510{�"' 6511 6515 in 6511 8590 7n 6511 F Cr 6521 6521! 6521 6520 5521 6527 652. m_ NI_•�P LEGEND --- 6533 { a �— ; 6521 : 6133 _ ''-1 6530 X55; 6577 6531 653•? 6531 6530 1 `". � � 5x31 5530 . ;z ,.`5987 6540 3a. 6591 -- s � � 5675 5640 .`743 b540 6'x11 65� 6511 6540 C Itt 13t�tr7]daT4' •,t., ) 4431 .6 - �.... .t bwl (R:a Bc+ttsadaTO 6611 t1 5963 6647 r FS `- Sut2le-Fatnrlr Re,,Orwtal)Two-Stnvi o b821 1 _ 0 E6b9 `ra• 9? R Duplex RrSrrkaltial dTst4r•STVnk 5631 Ttlteullottse Resitlenstal OTsa'o-.S td� erot e 6711 '� uitiplc•Fantil*. Rrsadtsatt3l(F '•5tar:1 0 6716 s Reudennal'LimitedC'out Bruno 7Tt�o-Stare1 J . 6731 m i 'tltxed•L'se Conuntrctal Re,tidrttnal rFuur-Sttm•) —- ■ DO 8&17 '&100 TO B lJ 9,-�+4•Sa7ar4•h C ottunemal Retail&OtTicr)T;co-Sicxvt 6815 Re-wiential Office t;Two-Sown t i Educational 1 Foutr-Stotv,+ 12 : i Public and Ixistittataoaal Four-Stars t Parks and Open Space ' N ■ so N SIN 71 ST TST , 4,. r' ,s Wob µ. ` ME to mo mar • B < r a ,.� ,� �, � •.� yew ar.�:. _ 3 �µr'fi a n.• +� (� _: '., .. } .r•F 'te ��` c ,,. .:.. .'- _:- � `°..tea... �^ �M '?,.. � ' - ,•: .. ;. � , ".i V��� Y4J�, t u} ' i CORWIL r , L PRoject r t REOUE51 TOR PROPOSALS u� I 1. IRfP.I NO 794 DEVELOPMENT ON MIAMI-DADE COUNTY OWNED LA14D FOP.NIDPHA OWNEE CARUSLE DEVELOPMENT GROUP 2950 S.'.+,.27TH AVENUE.SUITE 200 MIAMI.FL 33133 i r ' _ FAA[NG Z �...n w W T TLOT _ Lu s d... ON Mot i 2, i� V..uE NOV 2 9 2011 CA CORWIL LCi5 AL Gk"P:.33M 111�1g and Zoning 51,.3os<de�3s3 Department tment t PROJECT [OVEV FOR PROPOSALS ;a .. IRFP.I NO.Tod .,,..,. ,.,...,...�,s,,,.„,„ .,..... ..,.,,.,.,.„.m............... DEVELOPMENT ON MIAMI-DAOE COUNTY OWNED LAND FOR MDPHA ,a 404`# 0WHBb ":t CARLISLE�S.W. AVENUE SUITE 200 MIAMI,FL 33133 s r � � E I .lflrj{' r. Ar d •; q Z Q Lu Y ♦— r i ¢ :E 0 F— CL O,n r � 4 O 1YPCAl/WO STORY AFARI IXLLSTTR.BO VW5 TC"" RECEIVED *4 L"I 2 9 2011 Mw co Planning and Zoning CORWIL Department I. PROJECT. P,EOUES1 FOR PROPOSALS $, IRFP.I NO.794 DEVELOPMENT ON MIAMI-DADE q.y*. ' +-A; ` COUNTY OWNED LAND FOR MDPHA CARLISLE DEVELOPMENT GROUP 2950 S.W.27MAVENUE,SUITE 200 MIAM I.FL 33133 1 0 .,j"k Lu LU - w Y W .a. r S � a T TL 8, CL oN0 LLJ . , v rn _ U C. E t Z +' O - U a f RECEIVED *4 N'TJ 2 9 2011 co Planning and Zoning CORwa Department 4 t; r i i ,i d FOR.CC [SI i{ PROPOSALS .J IRPP.I�NO.744 DEVELOPMENT- , O COUNtt OWNED LAND FOR MDPHA , } .,, ., r: - +s, F'�:• - .L .a 95DSW.2N AVENUE,SVI o7A� TEYW MIAMI G133133 e t d a yl uU II,Nli14 "td� u' V w Q W w µ tz z. J Q ; Q r r for ` M 3 CL 0 W van U z O U WOW �i