The URL can be used to link to this page

Ord No 18-22-2439ORDINANCE NO.18-22-2439 An Ordinance pursuant to Section 20-5.7 of the Land Development Code providing for a Map Amendment to the City of South Miami Official Zoning Map from Transit-Oriented Development District Mixed-Use 5 (TODD MU-5) to Transit-Oriented Development District Mixed-Use 6 (TODD MU-6) on a 1.6124-acre (70,236 sq. ft.) property located at 6075 Sunset Drive and as legally described herein. WHEREAS, Sunset-Miami Investments, lnc./Maestra Sunset, LLC, Inc. has requested an amendment to the Official Zoning Map to change the designation of the approximately 1.6124-acre property located at 6075 Sunset Drive from Transit-Oriented Development District Mixed-Use 5 {TODD MU-5) to Transit-Oriented Development District Mixed-Use 6 {TODD MU-6); and WHEREAS, the City's Future Land Use Map {FLUM) designates the property as Transit-Oriented Development District (TODD); and WHEREAS, the City's Planning and Zoning Department ("Department") finds that the proposed application furthers the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and more specifically the following Goal, Objectives, and Policies: Future Land Use Element FLU GOAL 3 Transit-Oriented Development District (TODD) Provide for increased intensity of mixed-use projects and flexible building heights in designated Transit-Oriented Development Districts (TODD), to the extent that development and redevelopment in these districts does not adversely impact surrounding primarily residential neighborhoods and uses. FLU OBJECTIVE 3.1 Support higher densities and intensities in TODD Support higher densities and intensities in the TODD areas to take advantage of the proximity of the Metrorail and create an area where residents can live and work in a pedestrian-oriented environment. FLU Policy 3.1.1 Pursue traffic policies, parking policies, and pedestrian amenity policies that enhance the mass transit and town center functions. FLU GOAL 5 Revitalization of commercial areas outside of the Hometown District. To achieve revitalization and renewal of areas designated as redevelopment areas. Housing Element HOUSING GOAL 1 To assure the availability of desirable, sound, and affordable housing for all current and future residents of the City of South Miami with special focus on infill and redevelopment and to include additional housing units in the Hometown District. It is recognized that the choice of residence location and housing type rests with the individual and that the City's role is to implement policies that expand locational and cost choices. WHEREAS, the application is in keeping with the Transit-Oriented Development District land use designation as it is intended to provide for the development of retail and residential uses in a multi-story, mixed-use development that is characteristic of transit-oriented developments. WHEREAS, the Department staff analysis prepared by the City's planning consultant, Calvin Giordano & Associates, Inc. has determined that the proposed zoning map amendment is consistent with and furthers the intent of Page 1 of 4 Ord . No . 18-22-2439 t h e City's Co m prehensive Plan, and that the proposed map amendment is consistent with all requ i re m e nts of Section 20- 5. 7, of t h e South M iami Land Development Code that establishes the criteria for rezoning and text amendments; and W HER EAS, the Departme nt staff ana lysis determi ned that the effect of the r ezon i ng on this land which is within 1,000 feet of the South M i ami Metro Ra il Stati on, is to permit addit iona l height from e ight (8) stories maximum with bonuses to twelve (12) stories maximum with bonuses that enables mixed-use deve lopment at higher densities and intens ities without adve r sely impacti ng surrounding r es idential neighborhoods, in support of Future Land Use Eleme nt Goa l 3 , Objective 3.1 and Policy 3 .1.1; and W HEREAS, the rezo n ing is to a single parcel of land that is with i n t he Transit Oriented Development District (TODD) f utu re land use designat ion and i s supportive of the p u rpose of t hat des ignati on, t h e rezon i ng is justified and h as a ratio nal basis to support the goal, obj ectives, and policy of the TODD f uture la nd use des ignation; and WHEREAS , t he So uth Miam i Plann ing Board r eviewed the proposed amendment t o the Official Zon i ng Map , he ld an adverti sed pu blic h ea rin g on July 26, 2022, p rovided for publ ic participation in t h e process, a nd re ndered its recom m en dation of Ap proval to the City Commi ss i o n o n a vot e of six (6) to zero (0). NOW, THE REFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE M AYOR AND CI TY COM M ISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH M IAMI, FLORIDA AS FOLLOWS : Sec tion 1. Th e for egoing r ecita ls ar e her eby fou nd to be supported by competent substa ntial evidence and they are ratified and incorporated by refere n ce as if f u lly set forth he r ein and as the legis l ative i ntent of this Ordina nce. Section 2. The City of South Miami he r eby adopts the amendment to the Official Zoning Map, as set forth below, changing the designation for property at 6075 Sunset Driv e, and more specifically described in the attached Exhibit 1, from Transit-Oriented Development District Mixed-Use 5 (TODD MU-5) to Transit-Oriented Deve lopment District Mixed-Use 6 (TODD MU -6 ). Exi sting Official Zoning M a p Tra n si t Or i ented Deve lopmen t District Mixed -Use 5 (TODD M U-5) ~ _:-.:::.:::.==-'-==:::::----, ,·-·········~W71 ST 0 ST __ -,----, ! ,i --~! ~ .----, ~ \ TODD-MU5 ►' i i .. i ! : ···········-·· -~--'---------1 Proposed Offici a l Zo ning M a p Trans i t Orient ed Developm ent District Mixed-Use 6 (TODD M U-6) \ - '-': TODD-MU6 ~ ►' !!• i ~ TODD-Pl Page 2 of4 Ord. No . 18-22-2 43 9 Sect ion 3. Corrections . Conform i ng language or t ec hn ical scrivener-type correct io ns may b e made by the Ci t y Attorn ey for any conform i ng amen dm e nts to be incor porated i nto the fi nal ordinance for sign ature. Se ction 4. Codification. Th e provisio ns of th is Ordina nce sha ll become and be m ad e part of t h e Officia l Zo ning Map of the City of South M iam i as amended. Se ction 5. Or dinances in Conflict. A ll o rdinances or parts of ordinances and all sections an d parts of sect ions of o rdinances in direct conflict herewit h are hereby r epealed. Section 6. Severabi l ity. If any sectio n, clause, sentence, o r phrase of th is Ord inan ce i s for any reason held inva li d o r uncons titutio nal by a court of competent jurisd iction, t h is hold in g will not affect the va l id ity of the rema i nin g portions of t his Ordi nance, or t h e Gu idelin es adopted hereunder . Section 7 . Effectiv e Date. Th is Ordinance wi ll become effective upon the date of enactment. PASSSED AND ENACTED t his 6 th day of Septem b er, 2022. 1st Readi ng -9/6/22 2nd Read ing -9/20/22 READ A ND AP PR OV ED AS TO FO RM : LANGUAGE , LE GA LI TY, AND EXE -~---- COMMISS ION VOT E: Mayor Ph ilips: Commissioner Gi l : Commissioner Harri s: Comm iss ioner Li e bm an: Co m m iss ioner Co rey: Page 3 of4 4-1 Yea Yea Nay Yea Yea Ord. No. 18-22-2439 EXHIBIT 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALL OF TRACT A, LESS THE EAST 118 FEET OF THE NORTH 129.07 FEET, IN BLOCK 1, AND LOT 3, IN BLOCK 1, OF "ROSSWOOD", ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, AT PAGE 62 IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE SOUTH 25 FEET OF SAID BLOCK 1. Page 4 of 4 Agenda Item No:14. City Commission Agenda Item Report Meeting Date: September 6, 2022 Submitted by: Marcus Lightfoot Submitting Department: Planning & Zoning Department Item Type: Ordinance Agenda Section: Subject: QUASI-JUDICIAL WARNING: THE FOLLOWING MATTER IS CONSIDERED TO BE QUASI-JUDICIAL. PLEASE REVIEW THE RESTRICTIONS THAT ARE MORE FULLY SET FORTH AT THE END OF THIS AGENDA. An Ordinance pursuant to Section 20-5.7 of the Land Development Code providing for a Map Amendment to the City of South Miami Official Zoning Map from Transit-Oriented Development District Mixed-Use 5 (TODD MU-5) to Transit-Oriented Development District Mixed-Use 6 (TODD MU-6) on a 1.6124-acre (70,236 sq. ft.) property located at 6075 Sunset Drive and as legally described herein. 4/5 (City Manager-Planning Dept.) Suggested Action: Approval Attachments: 6075 Sunset Drive Development Memo 09-06-22.docx 6075_Sunset_Drive_Rezoning_Ordinance_-_08-11-2022_CArev.docx Ord No 06-18-2295 - 6075 Sunset Drive 2018 Rezoning.pdf Res No 074-18-15107 - 6075 Sunset Drive 2018 Special Exception.pdf Res No 075-18-15108 - 6075 Sunset Drive 2018 Variance.pdf 6075 Sunset Drive Redevelopment Application Documents.pdf 6075 Sunset Drive Traffic Study 6075 Sunset Drive - 08-24-2022 Full Set of Plans.pdf PB-22-011 & PB-22-012 Draft PB Regular Meeting Minutes Excerpt - 07-26-2022.pdf MDBR Ad.pdf MH Ad.pdf 1 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO:Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission VIA:Shari Kamali, City Manager Date:September 6, 2022 SUBJECT: An Ordinance pursuant to Section 20-5.7 of the Land Development Code providing for a Map Amendment to the City of South Miami Official Zoning Map from Transit-Oriented Development District Mixed-Use 5 (TODD MU-5) to Transit-Oriented Development District Mixed-Use 6 (TODD MU-6) on a 1.6124-acre (70,236 sq. ft.) property located at 6075 Sunset Drive and as legally described herein. A Resolution pursuant to Section 20-8.9 and other provisions of the City of South Miami Land Development Code approving by Special Exception a large-scale development on a 1.6124-acre property located at 6075 Sunset Drive and as legally described herein. PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ALL OF TRACT A, LESS THE EAST 118 FEET OF THE NORTH 129.07 FEET, IN BLOCK 1, AND LOT 3, IN BLOCK 1, OF "ROSSWOOD", ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED INPLATBOOK 13, AT PAGE 62 IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE SOUTH 25 FEET OF SAID BLOCK 1. BACKGROUND: The Applicant, Sunset-Miami Investments, Inc./Maestra Sunset, LLC,owns a 1.6124-acre (70,236 sq. ft.) property at 6075 Sunset Drive. The property is located north of Sunset Drive, east of SW 61 Avenue and south of SW 71 Street. The property was initially developed in 1961 with a 5-story commercial building. Several improvements/additions made to the structure over the years. Currently the site is vacant. In 2018, the City Commission approved a similar project for the site. At the time, that project consisted of an eight (8) story mixed use building that would have provided approximately 203 residential units, 2,441 square feet of commercial space, 3,678 square feet of restaurant space, and 314 parking spaces. In order for that project to be realized, the following requests were presented to the Commission and approved: 1. An Ordinance amending the Official Zoning Map; amending the designation of the northern portion of the property located at 6075 SW 72nd Street, from "TODD (MU-4)" to "TODD {MU-5)" – Approved on April 3, 2018, via Ordinance #06-18-2295; 2 Rezoning Application 6075 Sunset Drive September 6, 2022 Page 2 of 16 2 | P a g e 2. A Resolution approving a Special Exception so as to allow a project within the TODD (MU- 5) of more than four (4) stories and more than 40,000 square feet for the property located at 6075 SW 72nd Street. – Approved on April 3, 2018, via Resolution #074-18-15107; and 3. A Resolution relating to a Variance application to reduce the amount of required parking spaces for a mixed-use building located at 6075 SW 72nd Street. – Approved on April 3, 2018, via Resolution 075-18-15108. The project approved in 2018 was not built, and the current requests are being made in its place to effectuate the development of the parcel with a 10-story, mixed-use project containing 480,057 sq. ft. of gross floor area: 3,651 sq. ft. of retail uses and 1,353 sq. ft. of leasing space 932 sq. ft. of lobby area 316 rental apartments 329 parking spaces where (295 required) and 3 loading spaces Bike room (Bonus Floor request) Public Plazas (Bonus Floor request) Landscaping and resident amenities As part of this application, the Applicant has submitted severalrevisions concerning the following requests. The submittal dates referenced below are the most recent revised documents. *Application for Change of Zoning District and Letter of Intent (May 3, 2022) *Amended Letter of Intent for Change of Zoning District (July 5, 2022) *Application for Special Exception and Letter of Intent (May 3, 2022) *Amended Letter of Intent for Special Exception (July 5, 2022) *Final Plan Set: Architectural Plans submitted entitled “6075 Sunset Drive” prepared by MSA Architects, Inc. consisting of 42 Sheets: Cover Sheet – Re-submittal – 08/24/2022; Survey prepared by Leiter, Perez & Associates, Inc. dated 11/01/21 (revised 3/23/22); Context Map prepared byMSA Architects, Inc. dated 02/02/2022 (revised 08/08/2022); Exhibits EX-1, EX- 2, EX-3 prepared by MSA Architects dated 02/02/2022 (revised 08/08/2022); SP-1 prepared by MSA Architects, Inc. dated 02/02/2022 (revised 08/08/2022); Sheets A-2.1-A-2.11 (Levels 1-10 and Roof Plan)prepared by MSA Architects, Inc. consisting 11 sheets dated 02/02/2022 (revised 08/08/2022); Sheets A-3.1-A-3.5 (Color Building Elevations and Building Section) prepared by MSA Architects, Inc. consisting 5sheets dated 02/02/2022 (revised 08/08/2022); Sheets A-4.1-A-4.4 (Unit Plans) prepared by MSA Architects, Inc. consisting of 4sheets dated 02/02/2022 (revised 08/08/2022); Sheets RE-1-RE-3 (Renderings) prepared by MSA Architects, Inc. consisting of 3 sheets dated 02/02/2022 (revised 08/08/2022); Landscape Plans prepared by Witkin Hults + Partners consisting of 1 sheet (TD-1) dated 07/01/2022 (revised 08/04/2022), Sheets L-1-L-2 dated 04/28/2022 (revised 08/04/2022), Sheet L-3 dated 04/28/2022 (revised 08/04/2022), Sheet L-4 dated 07/01/2022 (revised 08/04/2022) and Statement of Landscape Compliance dated 7/18/2022); Civil Plan(C-1.0), Signing & Pavement MarkingPlan(C-2.0)and Maneuverability Analysis (LD-1.0, LD-2.0, AT-1.0 and AT- 2.0) prepared by David Plummer & Associates dated 08/05/2022 consisting of 6 sheets; a 3 Rezoning Application 6075 Sunset Drive September 6, 2022 Page 3 of 16 3 | P a g e Photometric Plan (Sheet L-1.1) prepared by EXP dated 07/07/2022; and Traffic Study (dated April 12, 2022,and updated June 29, 2022) prepared by Richard Garcia & Associates. Subject Property The property totals 1.6124 acres in size and is identified on the City’s maps as 6075 Sunset Drive. The Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser identifies the property as Folio No. 09-4025-011-0010. The City’s Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designates the property as Transit-Oriented Development District (TODD). The property is zoned Transit-Oriented Development District Mixed-Use 5 (TODD MU-5). This application is to rezone the property to Transit-Oriented Development District Mixed-Use 6 (TODD MU-6). Aerial of Subject Property The surrounding existing land uses, FLUM and zoning designations are summarized in Table 1. Table 1 Land Use FLUM Zoning North Medical TODD TODD-MU5 South City Hall and Public Library TODD TODD-PI East Commercial and Office TODD TODD-MU5 West Mixed-Use Residential and Commercial TODD TODD-MU5 4 Rezoning Application 6075 Sunset Drive September 6, 2022 Page 4 of 16 4 | P a g e Current Future Land Use Plan Map Current Zoning Map 5 Rezoning Application 6075 Sunset Drive September 6, 2022 Page 5 of 16 5 | P a g e REQUEST 1:ZONING MAP AMENDMENT TODD MU-5 TO MU-6 As proposed, the project requires approval of a map amendment to the City’s Official Zoning Map to rezone the 1.6124-acre property located at 6075 Sunset Drive from Transit-Oriented Development District Mixed-Use 5 (TODD MU-5) to Transit-Oriented Development District Mixed-Use 6 (TODD MU-6). The proposed change is depicted by the maps below. Existing Zoning Map 6 Rezoning Application 6075 Sunset Drive September 6, 2022 Page 6 of 16 6 | P a g e Proposed Zoning Map Amendment REZONING REQUEST ANALYSIS: Section 20-5.7, LDC –“Rezoning and text amendments”provides the criteria to rezone a parcel of land in the City and to amend the text of the City’s Land Development Code (LDC).The criteria and process to amend the zoning map is pertinent to this request and excerpted below. 20-5.7 -Rezoning and text amendments. (A)Multiple Properties.Multiple properties in any single application for a rezoning shall be contiguous to one another or accompanied by a unity of title agreement. (B)City Initiated Applications.An application for a rezoning or text amendment may be initiated by the City Commission, Planning Board, Environmental Review and Preservation Board or city administration. 7 Rezoning Application 6075 Sunset Drive September 6, 2022 Page 7 of 16 7 | P a g e (C)Intergovernmental Notice.When an application for a proposed rezoning involves a property located within five hundred (500) feet of the jurisdictional limits of the county or City of Coral Gables, notice of such application, specifying the date, time, and place of any scheduled public hearings, shall be transmitted to the planning departments or governing bodies of said jurisdictions. (D)Rezoning Reapplication.No reapplication for a rezoning shall be accepted by the city within twelve (12) months of the date of final disapproval by the city commission of a previous application for a change in zoning involving the same or substantially the same property, unless evidence is submitted to and accepted by the city commission which justifies such reconsideration. (E)Application Requirements.With the complete application, applicants shall submit a letter of intent, a property survey by a registered surveyor and a document indicating the written sworn consent of the owners of at least seventy-five (75) percent of the subject property or persons with a contract to purchase conditioned on rezoning approval. Such consent may be given by duly authorized agents of owners and agency shall be evidenced by a proper written power of attorney. (F)Neighborhood Awareness.All applications for a rezoning shall be accompanied by a map which reflects all properties and the names of all property owners within a five hundred (500) foot radius of the subject property. A notarized affidavit shall be presented to the Planning and Zoning Department within five (5) business days of submittal of an accepted application, attesting that the applicant gave notice of the proposed application to all the property owners within the noted five hundred (500) foot radius by regular U.S. mail with the exception of the abutting, or contiguous, property owners, who shall be made aware via Certified Mail. The affidavit shall be accompanied by a copy of the notification letter together with copies of the Certified Mail receipts. This application has met the requirements of Section 20-5.7. Table 2 provides a summary comparison of the land development controls for the TODD MU-5 and TODD-MU6 zoning districts. The differences between the two zoning districts are: maximum permissible building height, maximum number of floors and the bonus allocation options that are available. TABLE 2 Zoning Comparison: Existing TODD (MU-5), TODD (MU-6) and Proposed Development TODD-MU5 TODD-MU6 Proposed 6075 Sunset Drive District/Project Description Residential uses, Commercial uses Residential uses, Commercial uses retail uses,3,676 sq. ft. leasing office, 1,353 sq. ft. 316 residential units Density (DU’s/acre)50 (minimum)50 (minimum)196 Maximum Height 2 to 4 stories, Max. 8 with bonuses 4 to 8 stories Max. 12 with bonuses 10 stories: 8 as-of-right 8 Rezoning Application 6075 Sunset Drive September 6, 2022 Page 8 of 16 8 | P a g e (Stories & Feet) 100 feet to highest point 150 feet to highest point +2 by bonuses 110 ft.to the highest point Bonus Allocations Section 2-8.10(A) 1. for every one floor of residential use with sufficient parking, 1 bonus floor 2. public square, plaza, or green space of minimum 5,000 sq. ft. 3. “cross-thrus” from adjacent street to public open space Section 2-8.10(B)1. in addition to required 10%, provide 5% more low-income units or very low-Income units and 5% moderate-income units 2. assemblage of one or more contiguous acres 3. on-site bicycle amenities for buildings with office or commercial uses. Must include 3 of: secure bike parking room bike repair stations or repair room bike wash stations showers and locker/change rooms; availability of loaner bicycles 4.public square, plaza, or green space of minimum 7,500 sq. ft. 1.bicycle amenities, including: secure bicycle parking room for 28 bikes two bike repair stations availability of loaner bikes for residents and employees lockers and change room (shower not shown) 2. two plazas totaling 8,420 sq. ft. in area plaza 1: 7,530 sq. ft. along Sunset Drive, from SW 61st Av. to east property line plaza 2: 890 sq. ft. at corner of SW 71st St. and SW 61st Av. Landscaping Regulated by Sec. 20-4.5 and 20-4.5.1, and by Sec. 20-8.14(1)(a)for the TODD Regulated by Sec. 20-4.5 and 20-4.5.1, and by Sec. 20-8.14(1)(a) for the TODD Landscape requirements met Signage Master Plan Regulated by Sec. 20-4.3 and approved by administration or ERPB. Regulated by Sec. 20-4.3 and approved by administration or ERPB. Not yet submitted. Regulated by Sec. 20-4.3. Parking Regulated by Sec. 20-3.3 and Sec. 20-4.4, except as otherwise provided by Sec. 20-8.8 Regulated by Sec. 20-3.3 and Sec. 20-4.4, except as otherwise provided by Sec. 20-8.8 Total spaces provided: 312 296 on-site spaces 16 on-street spaces 3 loading spaces 28 interior bicycle spaces ERPB ERPB review required for Final Site Plan ERPB review required for Final Site Plan ERPB review required for Final Site Plan Regarding criteria for the application of zoning codes and rezoning, Florida Statutes Sec. 163.3202 requires that all local government land development regulations be consistent with and implement the City’s adopted Comprehensive Plan with specific provisions that are necessary or desirable to implement the plan’s goals, objectives,and policies. The proposed rezoning has been analyzed with respect to consistency and furtherance of the City of South Miami Comprehensive Plan. Staff finds that the proposed application furthers the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and more specifically the following Goal, Objectives, and Policies: Future Land Use Element (FLUE) FLUE GOAL 3 Transit-Oriented Development District (TODD) Provide for increased intensity of mixed-use projects and flexible building heights in designated Transit-Oriented Development Districts (TODD), to the extent that 9 Rezoning Application 6075 Sunset Drive September 6, 2022 Page 9 of 16 9 | P a g e development and redevelopment in these districts does not adversely impact surrounding primarily residential neighborhoods and uses. FLUE OBJECTIVE 3.1 Support higher densities and intensities in TODD Support higher densities and intensities in the TODD areas to take advantage of the proximity of the Metrorail and create an area where residents can live and work in a pedestrian- oriented environment. FLUE Policy 3.1.1 Pursue traffic policies, parking policies and pedestrian amenity policies that enhance the mass transit and town center functions. FLU GOAL 5 Revitalization of commercial areas outside of the Hometown District. To achieve revitalization and renewal of areas designated as redevelopment areas. Housing Element HOUSING GOAL 1 To assure the availability of desirable, sound, and affordable housing for all current and future residents of the City of South Miami with special focus on infill and redevelopment and to include additional housing units in the Hometown District. It is recognized that the choice of residence location and housing type rests with the individual and that the City's role is to implement policies that expand locational and cost choices. The application is in keeping with the Transit-Oriented Development District land use designation as it is intended to provide for the development of retail and residential uses in a multi-story, mixed-use development that is characteristic of transit-oriented developments. As part of the application review, a concurrency analysis was completed to determine compliance with Level of Service Standards. All Levels of Service will be met by this application. The results of the analysis can be found in the attachments, including the Traffic Impact Study and the School Concurrency Analysis. REQUEST 2: SPECIAL EXCEPTION FOR A LARGE-SCALE DEVELOPMENT The development proposed for 6075 Sunset Drive is Large-Scale Development (greater than 40,000 sq. ft. and more than four stories); and therefore, shall require a Special Exception approval by the City Commission. The Special Exception and plans were reviewed based on Section 20-8.9 and the development standards found in Article VIII – Transit-Oriented Development District (TODD). Special Exception Analysis: The criteria and standards for the analysis and recommendation for this request are provided in Section 20-8.9 – “Special exceptions” of the City’s land development code. Section 20-8.9 – “Special exceptions” 10 Rezoning Application 6075 Sunset Drive September 6, 2022 Page 10 of 16 10 | P a g e (A) A Special Exception as used in the T.O.D.D. shall mean a permitted use that complies with all the conditions and standards for the district as well as those set forth below. * * * (B) Any site that is in excess of forty thousand (40,000) square feet or any development, as defined in section 380.04, Florida Statutes (hereinafter referred to as "Development"), in excess of four (4) stories shall be designated as a Large-Scale Development it shall be reviewed by the Planning Board and it shall require approval by the City Commission. * * * (C) General Requirements. A Large Scale Development shall be approved and permitted by the City Commission at a public hearing, after the planning board makes its recommendation, provided that such use is specifically listed as a permitted use in the appropriate district column in the Permitted Use Schedule of the LDC (section 20- 3.3D, as may be amended), and that such use complies with the following general requirements and any other requirements that the City Commission may consider appropriate and necessary. 1. All such uses shall comply with all requirements established in the appropriate zoning use district, unless additional or more restrictive requirements are set forth below or by the City Commission. 2. All such uses must be of a compatible and complementary nature with any existing or planned surrounding uses. 3. The City Commission shall determine the overall compatibility of the development with the existing or planned surrounding uses. 4. If during the review process it is determined that the development, as proposed, will potentially cause adverse impact, the Planning Department shall recommend to eliminate or reduce, to the extent possible, these impacts. Development projects that are recommended for remedial measures will not be required to submit a new application unless it is determined by the Department that additional changes which would have the effect of increasing densities, square footage or altering the height or use of a Development have been made. Remedial measures may include, but are not limited to: i. Additional screening or buffering; ii. Additional landscaping; iii. Building orientation; iv. Relocation of proposed open space, or alteration of the use of such space; v. Pedestrian and bicycle safety and access; vi. Changes to ingress and egress; vii. Addressing traffic flow to and from the development to avoid intrusion on local streets in nearby single-family residential areas; or viii. Improvement of the streets adjacent to the project, if applicable. (D) Project Approval. 11 Rezoning Application 6075 Sunset Drive September 6, 2022 Page 11 of 16 11 | P a g e (a) Required Conditions. Prior to approving a Large-Scale Development, the City Commission must find that the development meets the requirements set forth in subsection (C) above and that it: 1. Will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity of the proposed use; 2. Will not be detrimental to the public welfare, property, or improvements in the neighborhood; and 3. Complies with all other applicable Code provisions. (b) Additional Conditions. The City Commission may designate such additional requirements in connection with the approval of a Large-Scale Development as will, in its opinion, assure that such development will conform to the foregoing requirements. * * * (I) The granting of a special exception shall be conditioned on the Applicant signing an agreement with the City, in a form acceptable to the City, which shall include all of the conditions required for the granting of the special exception ("Development Agreement"). * * * This application as proposed complies with the General Requirements of Subsection (C) and if approved, application of the TODD MU-6 zoning district on this site, establish permitted uses in a mixed-use development that complies with the general requirements and development parameters of the section, specifically: 1) the proposal will comply with all requirements of the TODD-MU-6 zoning use district; 2) will be compatible and complementary with existing and planned surrounding uses; and 3) will not cause adverse impact, and will not necessitateremedial measuresapplied to it. This application as proposed complies with the General Requirements of Subsection (D)(a)and it has been determined that the application will:1) not adversely affect the health and safety of persons in the surrounding area; 2) nor will it be detrimental to the neighborhood if certain transportation improvements are made; and 3) complies with all applicable code provisions. Site Plan Review: The proposed project consists of a ten-story mixed-use building (eight permitted by right, two additional bonus floor; with: 316 dwelling units (1-and 2-bedroom units);3,676 sq. ft. of retailspace, a 1,353 sq. ft. leasing office, 296 on-site parking spaces, 16 on-street parking spaces for a total of 312 spaces (301 spaces are required), 28bicycle spaces and 3loading spaces, landscaping, and public open spaces. The landscape plan complies with the landscape requirements found in the City land development code, Sections 20-4.5 and 20-4.5.1 in general, and Section 20-8.14(1)(a) for the TODD. The overall net external trip impact of the new development versus the vacant landis an increase of 93 trips during the AM peak period and 84 trips during the PM peak period. The studied intersections and roadways are operating at acceptable LOS D or better and will maintain their 12 Rezoning Application 6075 Sunset Drive September 6, 2022 Page 12 of 16 12 | P a g e respective levels-of-service for the future condition with the new traffic generated by the proposed development. Sufficient roadway capacity exists to support the development. The 6075 Sunset Drive site plan as proposed is consistent with Article III, Section 20-3.1 (A and B), 20-3.3 (D), Article VII, Section 20-7.2 (B), and Article VIII, Sections 20-8.1 through 20-8.17, and complies with the general requirements of Special Exceptions (Section 20-8.9) of the city’s Land Development Code. Detailed information about the Plan is contained in Planning Board Submittal documents (Architecture, Landscape and Civil) that are included inthe agenda packet. Planning Board Recommendation: After apublic hearing on July 26, 2022, the Planning Board voted six (6)tozero (0)on each ofthe two applications to recommend approval of the proposed applications, subject to four (4) additional conditions which are listed below and underlined. Recommendation – Rezoning: It is recommended that the City Commission approve with conditions the applications for: 1. Amendment to the City’s Official Zoning Map to rezone the 1.6124-acre property at 6075 Sunset Drive, as legally described in the Property Legal Description section on page 1 of this memo, from Transit-Oriented Development District Mixed-Use 5 (TODD MU-5) to Transit- Oriented Development District Mixed-Use 6 (TODD MU-6). 2. A Special Exception to permit the proposed large-scale development on a 1.6124-acre property located at 6075 Sunset Drive and as legally described in the Property Legal Description section on page 1 of this memo, with the large-scale development described by the architectural plans submitted entitled “6075 Sunset Drive” prepared by MSA Architects, Inc. consisting of 42 Sheets: Cover Sheet – Re-submittal – 08/24/2022. CONDITIONS: General Conditions 1. Architectural Plans submitted entitled “6075 Sunset Drive” prepared by MSA Architects, Inc. consisting of 42 Sheets: Cover Sheet – Re-submittal – 08/24/2022; Survey prepared by Leiter, Perez & Associates, Inc. dated 11/01/21 (revised 3/23/22); Context Map prepared by MSA Architects, Inc. dated 02/02/2022 (revised 08/08/2022); Exhibits EX-1, EX-2, EX-3 prepared by MSA Architects dated 02/02/2022 (revised 08/08/2022); SP-1 prepared by MSA Architects, Inc. dated 02/02/2022 (revised 08/08/2022); Sheets A-2.1-A-2.11 (Levels 1-10 and Roof Plan) prepared by MSA Architects, Inc. consisting 11 sheets dated 02/02/2022 (revised 08/08/2022); Sheets A-3.1-A-3.5 (Color Building Elevations and Building Section) prepared by MSA Architects, Inc. consisting 5 sheets dated 02/02/2022 (revised 08/08/2022); Sheets A- 4.1-A-4.4 (Unit Plans) prepared by MSA Architects, Inc. consisting of 4 sheets dated 02/02/2022 (revised 08/08/2022); Sheets RE-1-RE-3 (Renderings) prepared by MSA Architects, Inc. consisting of 3 sheets dated 02/02/2022 (revised 08/08/2022); Landscape Plans prepared by Witkin Hults + Partners consisting of 1 sheet (TD-1) dated 07/01/2022 13 Rezoning Application 6075 Sunset Drive September 6, 2022 Page 13 of 16 13 | P a g e (revised 08/04/2022), Sheets L-1-L-2 dated 04/28/2022 (revised 08/04/2022), Sheet L-3 dated 04/28/2022 (revised 08/04/2022), Sheet L-4 dated 07/01/2022 (revised 08/04/2022) and Statement of Landscape Compliance dated 7/18/2022); Civil Plan(C-1.0), Signing & Pavement Marking Plan (C-2.0) and Maneuverability Analysis (LD-1.0, LD-2.0, AT-1.0 and AT- 2.0) prepared by David Plummer & Associates dated 08/05/2022 consisting of 6 sheets; Photometric Plan (Sheet L-1.1) prepared by EXP dated 07/07/2022; and Traffic Study (dated April 12, 2022, and updated June 29, 2022) prepared by Richard Garcia & Associates. 2.All documents submitted with this application are to be made part of the record. 3.All off-site improvements required under any approvals shall be completed prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy unless such deadline is extended by the City Manager. 4.Any improvements in the Public Right-of-Way shall be approved by the City of South Miami, Miami-Dade County, and/or FDOT dependent upon jurisdiction. 5.All impact fees shall be paid by the Applicant prior to issuance of building permit. 6.The Applicant shall provide a letter acknowledging compliance with the applicable Level of Services requirements prior to the issuance of final permit to the property. If any concurrency approvals expire a re-review shall be required by the appropriate agency. 7.Any changes that increase densities, intensities or population shall require a new Concurrency Analysis. 8.Flood elevations shall be reviewed and approved for consistency with FEMA requirements and the City’s National Insurance Flood Program Ordinance prior to building permit approval. 9.The Applicant shall comply with applicable conditions and requirements by Miami-Dade County Public Works Department, Fire Rescue Department, Department of Regulatory and Economics Resources - DERM (DRER), and Miami-Dade County Water and Sewer Department, if any. 10. That the required bike room and number of bicycle spaces for both residents and the public be maintained as a requirement of being granted a Bonus Floor. 11. That the required Plaza be maintained and open to the public as a requirement of being granted a Bonus Floor. 12. That pursuant to Sec. 20-4.3, LDC, Sign Regulations, a Master Signage Plan be submitted, under separate permit. 14 Rezoning Application 6075 Sunset Drive September 6, 2022 Page 14 of 16 14 | P a g e 13. That any Access and Maintenance Agreement for the plazas be submitted to the City for review and approval. 14. That the Applicant post a Sustainability Fee Payment Bond or fully pay the Sustainability Fee in an amount equal to five Percent (5%) of the construction value per Sec. 20-8.13 (B)(6)(a), LDC. 15. That the project obtains Environmental Review and Preservation Board approval prior to Building Permit. 16. That the project meets the requirements of Sec. 20-4.4(G), LDC relating to Electric Vehicles. 17. That the Application meet the requirements of Sec. 20-8.13(B), LDC, Green Buildings. 18. That a signed and sealed Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan be submitted at the time of building permit. 19. That a signed and sealed Paving, Grading and Drainage Plan be submitted at the time of building permit. 20. That preliminary drainage calculations be submitted to ensure that the site can maintain its required drainage. 21. That all ADA standards and requirements are met. 22. That all tree grates and sidewalk widths meet ADA requirements. 23. That the column in the site triangle be addressed/relocated. 24. That the Auto Turn diagram be corrected. 25. That the project meets the requirements of Sec. 20-8.4(D) relating to Affordable Housing to provide 32 affordable housing units within the project. 26. That a signed and sealed Geotechnical Report confirming concrete sidewalk and pavement sections and hydraulic conductivity for the soils be submitted at the time of building permit. Construction General Conditions 27. A Construction and Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) Plan shall be provided by the Applicant to the Building and Public Works Departments for approval prior to start of construction. Access points by construction vehicles shall be provided within the MOT. All construction vehicles are prohibited from using Sunset Drive, unless otherwise approved by the Department. 15 Rezoning Application 6075 Sunset Drive September 6, 2022 Page 15 of 16 15 | P a g e 28. The Applicant shall provide for the reconstruction of the adjoining roadways, sidewalks, and drainage to their conditions prior to construction, or better, and to provide a performance bond equal to 100% of the total cost of reconstruction. 29. The Applicant shall provide a Construction Air Quality Management Plan to the Department prior to the start of construction. 30. A Construction, Demolition and Materials Management Plan (CDMMP) must be submitted by the Applicant at time of building permit. 31. Construction shall only take place Monday through Friday during the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Landscaping 32. The Applicant shall meet all of the minimum requirements of the City Code, Chapters 18 and 24 of the Miami-Dade County Code and specifically comply with all conditions imposed by Miami-Dade County Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources - DERM (DRER), if any. 33. The property shall be landscaped in accordance with the landscape plan, included with the site plan submittal. 34. Pursuant to Sec. 20-4.5, as may be amended, the Applicant shall preserve existing trees (including native trees) during the development of the project, wherever possible. If the trees must be removedor relocated, the Applicant shall be required to obtain a tree removal permit from the City prior to the removal and/or relocation of any tree and mitigate the impact in accordance with City requirements. If the relocated trees do not survive, the Applicant shall be required to replace the trees in compliance with City requirements. Environmental 35. The Applicant shall meet the requirements of the Miami-Dade County Water-Use Efficiency Standards Manual, effective January 2009, as may be amended from time to time. 36. All storm water drainage systems, including the stormwater vault under the park, shall be maintained in working order at all times in order to avoid localized flooding during and after a storm. Parking shall be prohibited on top of any drainage inlet or drainage manhole. Architecture 37. Substantial compliance with the approved plans to include: design, materials, and color palette, subject to the approval of the Environmental Review and Preservation Board. 16 Rezoning Application 6075 Sunset Drive September 6, 2022 Page 16 of 16 16 | P a g e ATTACHMENTS: 1)Application for Change of Zoning District (May 3, 2022) 2)Amended Letter of Intent for Change of Zoning District (July 5, 2022) 3)Application for Special Exception (May 3, 2022) 4)Amended Letter of Intent for Special Exception (July 5, 2022) 5)Final Plan Set (dated 07/19/2022) 6)Traffic Study (April 12, 2022, and updated June 29, 2022) 7)Concurrency Analysis (prepared by Calvin Giordano & Assoc., Inc., dated July 17, 2022 8)Miami-Dade County Public Schools Concurrency Preliminary Analysis 9)Ordinance #06-18-2295 10) Resolution #074-18-15107 11) Resolution #075-18-15108 12) Draft Ordinance amending the Official Zoning Map 13) Draft Resolution approving a Special Exception 14) Mailing Label Affidavit with Location Map (Property Owners within 500 feet) 15) Mailing Label Affidavit with Location Map (Abutting Property Owners) 16) Applicant’s Notification Letter and Affidavit 17 23 ORDINANCE NO. 06-18-2295 An Ordinance amending the Official Zoning Map; amending the designation of the northern portion of the property located at 6075 SW 72nd Street, from ''TODD (MU-4)" to "TODD (MU-5)". WHEREAS, Alta Developers, LLC, (the "Applicant"), submitted an application (PB-17-032) to amend the City of South Miami Official Zoning Map to change the designation of the northern portion of the property located at 6075 SW 72 nd Street, and as shown in Exhibit 1, from "TODD (MU-4)" Transit- Oriented Development District (Mixed Use-4) to "TODD (MU-5)" Transit-Oriented Development District (Mixed-Use 5); and WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency has reviewed the proposed amendment to the Official Zoning Map, and it has held an advertised public hearing and provided for public participation in the process and rendered its recommendation of approval to the City Commission on a vote of four (4) ayes to two (2) nays. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City of South Miami hereby adopts an amendment to the Official Zoning Map changing the designation for the northern portion of the property located at 6075 SW 72 nd Street and as set forth below, from ''TODD (MU-4)" Transit-Oriented Development District (Mixed Use-4) to "TODD (MU-5)" Transit-Oriented Development District (Mixed-Use 5). Existing Official Zoning Map Proposed Official Zoning Map 7031 ,v•~\-] -J[fil \I t, '" .... j -; !1 l I 1031 I I ·-=1 en Ul-4 ,\ q; 1000 ~o II! __ .,._ 71ot, -,n, n 7000 ·➔ ·, I TOD f •' U"4 , ~ '11 1111 !~~i----I ~ 6075 ... \; I I 6161 feJS I I I I . 1io~ :1 'fi 6193 ' j I 61'1 ' 6101 ~-; ! '-fl) fMU-5 SW 72NDST .. > MU-& SW T2Hll BT • ---------.. 69 ........................... , ,...-----. / Section 2. Codification. The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made part of the Official Zoning Map of the City of South Miami as amended. Section 3. Severability. If any section, clause, sentence, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, this holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or the Guidelines adopted hereunder. Section 4. Ordinances in Conflict. All ordinances or parts of ordinances and all sections and parts of sections of ordinances in direct conflict herewith are hereby repealed. 24 Pg. 2 of Ord. No. 06-18-2295 Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective upon enactment. PASSSED AND ENACTED this 3rd day of April , 2018. istReading_ 3/20/18 2nd Reading-4 / 3 / 1 8 COMMISSION VOTE: Mayor Stoddard: Vice Mayor Harris: Commissioner Gil: Commissioner Liebman: Commissioner Welsh: 5-0 Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea 25 ~ Southtiami THE CITY OF PLEASANT LIVING CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM To: The Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Commission V1A: Steven J. Alexander, City Manager FROM: DATE: Jane K. Tompkins, AICP, Planning and Zoning Direct1fl.) March 20, 2018 SUBJECT: II An Ordinance amending the Official Zoning Map; amending the designation of the northern portion of the property located at 6075 SW 72nd Street, from ;'TODD (MU-4)" to ''TODD (MU- S)". A Resolution approving a Special Exception so as to allow a project within the TODD (MU-5) of more than four (4) stories and more than 40,000 square feet for the property located at 6075 SW 72nd Street. A Resolution relating to a variance application to reduce the amount of required parking spaces for a mixed-use building located at 6075 SW 72 nd Street. BACKGROUND: The property known as 6075 Sunset Drive is 1.6-acres in size and has frontages on SW 72 nd Street, SW 61 st Avenue, and SW 71 st Street; it makes up approximately one-half of the block. Currently, it's developed with a 20,371 sq. ft. multi-story office building and surface parking lot. The southeast corner of the lot is open space and there are several mature trees on the site. According to the City's Official Zoning Map, the property is zoned both TODD (MU-4) "Transit- Oriented Development District (Mixed-Use 4)" and TODD {MU-5) "Transit-Oriented Development District (Mixed-Use 5)", with the lot being split roughly in half north to south. The Future Land Use Map designation for the property is TODD (4+4 Story), which is consistent with both zoning districts. 26 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 2 of 13 PROJECT PROPOSAL Property Location Alta Developers, LLC, (the "applicant"), has submitted three (3) applications for the property: (1) a zoning map amendment for the northern portion of the property, changing it from TODD MU- 4 to TODD MU-5; (2) a special exception for a large-scale development of more than 40,000 square feet and four (4) stories; and {3) a variance to reduce the number of required parking spaces. The application package, which includes, among other things, the application, the letter of intent, a survey with legal description, render!ngs, a zoning chart, floor plans and roof plan (pages A-1.01 through A-1.07), elevations of the four fac;:ades (pages A-2.01 and A-2.02), a Tree Disposition Plan (sheet TD-1) and landscape plans (pages L-1 through L-4) is provided as an Attachment. If the applications are approved, the applicant will demolish the existing improvements and develop a multi-story, mixed-use (commercial/residential) building. Commercial space, consisting of 3,678 square feet of restaurant and 2,441 square feet of retail uses, will be located on the ground floor of the Sunset Drive fac;:ade, and wrap around the corner of the building to also face onto SW 61 st Avenue. JKT 2:\Commission ltems\2018\04-03-2018_\6075 Sunset\6075 Sunset staff memo 04032018.docx 27 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 3 of l3 A total of 203 residential units will be located on the upper levels of the building and the ground floor level of the northern portion of the building. The unit mix consists of town homes, studios, and one-, two-, and three-bedroom units of varying sizes as follows: BREAKDOWN OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS Unit Type Number of Units Average Size Unit Mix(%) (SF) 1 Bedroom 102 738 50% 2 Bedrooms 72 1,077 35 3 Bedrooms 8 1,433 4 Studio 14 566 7 Townhomes 7 931 3 UNITTOTAL 203 100 Six of the town home units will be located on the ground floor adjacent to SW 71 st Street and the seventh adjacent 61 st Avenue. These units will be accessed from both the ground floor parking area and from the right-of-way. Tenant amenities including a dog park, pool deck, and common areas are provided on the upper levels of the building. A total of 303 on-site parking spaces will be provided to serve the building. Access to the parking garage is obtained via SW 71 st Street and parking makes up the second through fifth levels of the northern portion of the building. Ground-level parking and loading areas are accessed via 61 st Avenue. The building will be eight (8) stories in height along Sunset Drive and step down to fifty-two {52) feet along 7l51 Street. APPLICATION REQUESTS The applicant has submitted three zoning applications: (1) a zoning map amendment from TODD (MU-4} to TODD (MU-5); (2) a Special Exception to allow a large-scale development of more than four stories and 40,000 square feet; and (3) a Variance to allow a reduction in the number of parking spaces. 1. Zoning Map Amendment TODD (MU-4) to TODD (MU-5) In order to develop the proposed mixed-use building, the northern portion of the property must be rezoned from TODD (MU-4) to TODD (MU-5). Excerpts of the existing and proposed zoning map are provided below: JKT Z:\Commission ltems\2018\04-03-2018\6075 Sunset\6075 Sunset staff memo 04032018.docx 28 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 4 of 13 Proposed Zoning Map Per the LDC, the TODD's purpose is to maximize the presence of the mass transit center that's within walking distance of the districts' boundaries. The district is made up of five (5) subcategories and it's intended to provide for the development of office uses, office services, office-related retail, retail, retail services, and residential uses in multi-story and mixed use projects that are characteristic of transit-oriented developments (Sec. 20-3.1(8}{16}). TODD MU-4 and TODD MU-5 are both described as "mixed use". The major difference between the two categories is in the allowable building height. MU-4 is limited to two stories. MU-5, on the other hand, requires a minimum oftwo stories with four stories allowed by right; up to eight stories are allowed if the building is designed in a way that makes it eligible for certain bonuses. These height bonuses are discussed in more detail in the discussion on the Special Exception request. There are also minor differences between MU-4 and MU-5 in the types of uses permitted: banks and saving institutions are allowed by-right in MU-5 and reupholstery and furniture repair is allowed as a special use in MU-5. Neither use is allowed in MU-4. Further, free- standing garages are allowed in MU-5, but not MU-4. As shown on the excerpt of the Zoning Map, above, the MU-4 district makes up essentially the northern half of the lots between SW 59 th Place and SW 61 st Court. This enclave of MU-4 is surrounded by MU-5, Medium Intensity Office (MO) and TODD {Pl). The mixed-use TODD and MO district are very similar in terms of land uses allowed, with the main differences being that MO doesn't allow the range of residential dwelling types or the retail uses found in the TODD. The table below provides the dimensional standards for the three districts: Comparison of Dimensional Requirements TODD (MU-4) TODD (MU-5) MO Minimum Size NA NA 10,000 sq. ft. Frontage NA NA 100' JKT Z:\Commission ltems\2018\04-03-2018\6075 Sunset\6075 Sunset staff memo 04032018.docx 29 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 5 of 13 Setback Front Vary based on Vary based on 15* Rear location location 10 Side {Interior) 0 Side (Street) 10 Between Buildings 20 Maximum Height 2 stories/28' 2 stories minimum/4 4 stories/SO' story maximum; up to 8 stories with bonuses per Sec. 20- 8.10 Building Coverage NA NA NA- Impervious NA NA 85% Coverage FAR NA NA 1.6 As both MO and TODD (MU-5} allow for greater building heights and similar uses, the requested zoning change would not be incompatible. Staff has also reviewed the City's Comprehensive Plan and determined the requested rezoning furthers the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and, more specifically, the following goals and policies of the Future Land Use element: JICT Policy 1.1.2 In reviewing proposed amendments to this plan and the Zoning Map, compatibility with adjacent uses shall be the major determinant. Goal 3 To achieve a tax base adequate to support a high level of municipal services via increased mixed-use projects and flexible building heights in designated Transit Oriented Development Districts {TODD), to the extent that development and redevelopment in these districts does not adversely impact surrounding neighborhoods and uses. Policy 3.1.1 Zone for new development and redevelopment in accordance with the Future Land Use Map, including multi-story and mixed-used districts. Policy 3.1.4 The City of South Miami encourages development and redevelopment in the Transit-Oriented Development District. Existing streetscape widths along SW 62 Avenue and Sunset Drive will permit increased building heights that are aesthetically-pleasing. The City encourages transparent street-level retail with a mix of retail services, office uses, office services, and residential uses in mixed-use and multi-story projects, as well as encouraging a district-wide mix of land uses via multiple projects. Z:\Comm,ssion ltems\2018\04-03-2018\6075 Sunset\6075 Sunset staff memo 04032018.docx 30 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 6 of 13 Finally, a concurrency analysis (see attachment) was completed to determine compliance with the various Level of Services standards. The standards will be satisfied by the proposed project. 2. Special Exception for a Large-Scale Development The applicant's second request is for approval of special exception for large-scale development. Pursuant to the TODD regulations (Sec. 20-8.9 Special Exceptions), any site larger than 40,000 square feet or any development taller than four (4) stories shall be designated as a Large-Scale Development and reviewed under the Special Exception provisions of the Code. The proposed project exceeds both thresholds. Essentially, this section provides conditions and design requirements that a project must satisfy for approval; it is provided in its entirety as an Attachment. Staff Observations Based on Section 20-8.9 1. Residential uses are not permitted on the first floor within that portion of the building fronting on the main street. The phrase "main street" means the thoroughfare that abuts the property line of the development and which has the most traffic, as compared to any other street that abuts the property. The proposed project includes first floor residential on SW 61 st and SW 71st • As these roadways do not have as much traffic as Sunset Drive, the project complies with this requirement. 2. The proposed uses are of a compatible and complementary nature with the existing and planned surrounding uses. The property is surrounded by buildings of various heights and land uses, including retail, office, a private club, a school and a mixed-use building. JKT Z:\Commission ltems\2018\04-03-2018\6075 Sunset\6075 Sunset staff memo 04032018.docx 31 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 7 of 13 Comparison with Surrounding Properties Land Use Zoning Property Office TODD MU-4 and TODD MU-5 North Office MO East Commercial TODD MU-4 and TODD MU-5 South City Hall and Miami-Dade TODD-Pl County Library West Multi-family residential, TODD MU-4, TODD MU-5 Office, and Private Club and MO 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity nor will it be detrimental to the public welfare, property or improvements in the neighborhood. 4. The MU-5 district allows four stories by right, and up to four more under Section 20-8.10 Bonus oflocations, as follows: Action Bonus For every one (1) floor of residential use One (1) additional floor of residential use with the minimum parking requirement (two (2) cars per residential use) Public plaza-min. five thousand (5,000) sq. ft. One (1) additional floor and art work in plaza setting Develop full frontage with street-design as One (1) additional floor part of pedestrian walkway system Develop "cross-thru's" from street to public One (1) additional floor open space system as part of pedestrian walk- system, on owner's property (maintenance required in Section 20-8.15) With three levels of residential, the project is entitled to an additional three floors. The full- frontage street design along Sunset Drive entitles the project to a fourth bonus floor, bringing the total project to a height of eight (8) stories. The fac;:ade proposed for SW 7i5t Street is only fifty-two (52) feet in height, which is comparable to the four stories/fifty (SO) feet limit of the MO district across the street. JKT Z:\Commissio~ ttems\2018\04-03-2018\6075 Sunset\6075 Sunset staff memo 04032018 docx 32 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 8 of 13 5. The project must comply with other applicable Code provisions, includingthe_TODD Regulating Plan. The Regulating Plan classifies streets in the district as either Main or Minor; and further provides design standards such as the location and dimensions of build-to lines and requirements for awnings or arcades based on these street types. The site plan for this property, which is challenged by having three (3) street frontages, was designed to comply with the regulations for a Main Street (i.e., Sunset Drive), which i_~ treated as the front of the building. Further, the facades along SW 61st Avenue and SW 71st Street, which are designated as Minor Streets, are treated as the side of the building. The building lacks the required awning or arcade on the north elevation but staff notes that the townhouse type residential units do not lend themselves to an awning or arcade, and that the landscaped areas in front of the units and the street trees will serve the same purpose as an arcade. Finally, Staff notes that the building at the east end of the block which also has frontage on three (3) streets, treats the71st Street fac;:ade as the rear of the structure and lacks an arcade or awning. Staff recommends that this be resolved with the Environmental Review and Preservation Board during their review. 6. The Traffic Impact Study and the Parking Study prepared by Richard Garcia & Associates, Inc., were reviewed on behalf of the City by Juan Calderon of CALTRAN Engineering Group, Inc. Mr. Calderon determined that the studies were acceptable (please see Attachments). 7. A Development Agreement and a Maintenance Covenant shall be prepared and approved by the Commission, in accordance with Section 20-8.9(1) and (J). 3. Variance to reduce the total number of parking spaces The final application is for a variance to reduce the required number of off-street parking spaces for the proposed development. As designed, the project has 303 spaces on-site and gets credit for eleven (11) spaces on the adjacent streets for a total of 314 spaces. With 203 residential units and 6,119 square feet of ground floor commercial/retail space, the project would be required to provide a total of 466 spaces: JKT Residential: 2 spaces per unit plus 1 visitor space per 10 units (203 X 2) + (203/10) = 406 + 21 = 427 Retail: 1 space per 300 sq. ft. gross floor area 2,441/300 = 9 Restaurant: 1/100 sq. ft. of patron area plus 1/300 of non-patron area 2,452/100 = 25 1,226/300 = 5 TOTAL: 427 + 9 + 25 + 5 = 466 Z:\Comm,ssion ltems\2018\04-03-2018\6075 Sunset\6075 Sunset staff memo 04032018.docx 33 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 9 of 13 With 466 spaces required and 314 provided, the project has a deficit of 152 spaces. The applicant proposes providing the required spaces for the retail and restaurant uses and the required visitor spaces, but reducing the residential parking to 1.3 spaces per unit for 275 residential spaces. Pursuant to Section 20-5.9 of the LDC, a variance for off-street parking can be reviewed and permitted by the City Commission at a public hearing, after a recommendation by the Planning Board. Variance decisions shall be based on an affirmative finding as to each of five criteria presented below along with Staff's findings. Please note that the Applicant's letter of intent includes their comments on how each of the criteria are satisfied. JKT 1. The variance is necessary to relieve particular extraordinary conditions relating to a specific property; Staff Response: The LDC requires properties in the TODD to have their parking located at the side or rear of the building, so street frontages can be developed with uses that maximize the pedestrian experience. Since this property has three street frontages all three nave retail/restaurant and/or residential uses. Those liner uses result in the parking being limited to a smaller area of the ground level and the upper levels. With the four-story height limit of the MO district to the north, and to limit its bulk, the building is not designed to the full permitted height. These considerations result in even less space being available for parking and the inability to comply with the code requirements for parking. 2. Denial of the variance would result in hardship to the owner. Hardship results ifthe restriction of the zoning ordinance, when applied to a particular property, becomes arbitrary, confiscatory or unduly oppressive because of conditions of the property that distinguish it from other properties under similar zoning restrictions; Staff Response: One hundred sixteen units, or over half of the total, are either studio apartments or one-bedroom units. Imposing the code required parking of two (2) spaces per unit for these small units, seems unduly oppressive. 3. The extraordinary conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant; Staff Response: The condition of having three (3) adjacent streets is not the result of an action of the applicant. Z:\Comm,ss,on !tems\2018\04-03-2018\6075 Sunset\6075 Sunset sta'f memo 04032018.docx 34 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 10 of 13 4. The requested variance is the minimum variance necessary to make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure; Staff Response: Given the mix of unit sizes, the cost of the additional parking and the impact of the additional floors on the building's design, the variance requested is the minimum necessary to make possible the reasonable use of the land. 5. That the approval of the variance will be in consistent with the general intent and purpose of the Land Development Code, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Staff Response: Allowing a reduction in parking in the urban area close to the Metrorail, shopping and employment centers is consistent with the general intent and purpose of the LDC and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or detrimental to the public welfare. It is worth noting that it's common in development regulations to provide lower ratios for smaller units such as studios, and for transit oriented projects such as this one. Further, the Parking Study prepared by Richard ~arcia & Associates demonstrates that the proposed parking will be sufficient for the needs of the development. PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION Following a public hearing on December 12, 2017, the Planning Board voted as follows to recommend approval of the applications, inclusive of staff's recommended conditions listed below, and the following additional conditions: {1) ensure that the Landscape Plan comply with the mitigation requirements of the LDC; and (2) the applicant to consider a minimum of four (4) units of affordable housing via a covenant. JKT 1) Zoning Map Amendment from TODD (MU-4) to TODD (MU-5): Vote: six ayes, two nays (2) Special Exception to allow a project of more than four (4) stories and more than 40,000 square feet in size: Vote: six ayes, two nays {3) Variance to reduce the amount of required parking: Vote: six ayes, two nays Z:\Commission ltems\2018\04-03-2018\6075 Sunset\6075 Sunset staff memo 04032018.docx 35 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment Aprii 3, 2018 Page 11 of 13 STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Staff recommends approval, with the conditions listed below, of the proposed changes: (1) an amendment to the Official Zoning Map changing the designation from TODD MU-4 to TODD MU- S for the northern portion of the property; (2) a Special Exception to allow a large-scale development; and {3) a Variance to reduce the required number of parking spaces. General Conditions 1. Any development of the property will be in substantial compliance with the documents submitted including: Letter of Intent from Ines Marrero-Priegues dated August 11, 2017; Application Book consisting of a survey prepared by Fortun, Leavy, Skiles, Inc. dated 7 /27 /17; Renderings dated 9/20/17 (Sheets R-1.0 through R-1.2), Site Photographs (Sheets CP-1.0 and CP- 2.0}; a Zoning Chart dated 8/11/17 (Sheet A-0.1) a site plan data sheet (A-1.00); Floor and Roof Plans (Sheets A-1.00 through 1.07); building elevations (Sheets A-2.01 and A-2.02); a building section drawing {Sheet A-3.01); and Planter Details {Sheet A-4.0) all signed and sealed by Roberto Behar (9-20-17); and a Tree Disposition Plan dated 10/10/17 (Sheet TD-1) and landscape plans (Sheets L-1 through L-4) dated 8/8/17 prepared by Witkin Hults Design Group; and a Traffic Impact Study and Parking Study both prepared by Richard Garcia & Associates. 2. All documents submitted with this application are to be made part of the record. 3. Any improvements in the Public Right-of-Way shall be approved by the applicable agency (FDOT, Miami-Dade County and/or City of South Miami). 4. All impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permit. 5. The Applicant shall provide a letter acknowledging compliance with the applicable Level of Services requirements prior to the issuance of final permit to the property. If any concurrency approvals expire a re-review shall be required by the appropriate agency. 6. Any changes that increase densities, intensities or population shall require a new Concurrency Analysis. 7. Applicant shall submit verification from Miami-Dade County that the proposed new development has been reviewed and approved for all access management considerations prior to site plan approval. 8. Flood elevations shall be reviewed and approved for consistency with FEMA requirements and the City's National Insurance Flood Program Ordinance prior to building permit approval. JKT Z:\Comrn,ss,on lterr.s\2018\04-03-2018\6075 Su~set\6075 Sunset staff r,emo 04032018.docx 36 Alta Developers UC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 12 of 13 9. The Applicant shall comply with applicable conditions and requirements by Miami-Dade County Public Works Department, Fire Rescue Department, Department of Regulatory and Economics Resources -DERM (DRER), Miami-Dade County Water and Sewer Department, and FOOT. 10. The Applicant shall execute and record in the public records of Miami-Dade County, a Development Agreement and a Maintenance Covenant, in a form approved by the City Commission and City Attorney, which complies with the requirements of Land Development Code Section 20-8.9. 11. The Applicant shall execute and record in the public records of Miami-Dade County, a restrictive covenant, in a form approved by and subject to the review and approval of the City Manager and City Attorney, which contains all commitments made and conditions imposed as part of the approval of the Applications. Construction General Conditions 12. A Construction and Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) Plan shall be provided by the Applicant to the Public Works Departments for approval prior to start of construction. Access points by construction vehicles shall be provided within the MOT. 13. The Applicant shall provide a Construction Air Quality Management Plan to the Department prior to the start of construction. 14. A Construction, Demolition and Materials Management Plan (CDMMP) must be submitted by the Applicant at time of building permit. 15. Construction shall only take place Monday through Friday during the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Landscaping 16. The Applicant shall meet all of the minimum requirements of the City Code, Chapters 18 and 24 of the Miami-Dade County Code and specifically comply with all conditions imposed by Miami-Dade County Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources - DERM (DRER), if any. 17. The property shall be landscaped in accordance with the landscape plan, included with the site plan submittal, and approved by the Environmental Review and Preservation Board. 18. Pursuant to Sec. 20-4.5, as may be amended, the Applicant shall provide mitigation for all trees to be removed in accordance with City requirements. J1C Z:\Commission ltems\2018\04-03-2018\6:J75 Sunset\5075 Sunset staff memo 04032018 cocx 37 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 13 of 13 Environmental 19. The Applicant shall meet the requirements of the Miami-Dade County Water-Use Efficiency Standards Manual, effective January 2009, as may be amended from time to time. 20. All storm water drainage systems shall be maintained in working order at all times to avoid localize flooding during and after a storm. Parking shall be prohibited on top of any drainage inlet or drainage manhole. Architecture 21. Final approval of all plans must be obtained from the Environmental Review and Preservation Board, as required by Code. ATTACHMENTS: * Application Package * Application * Letter of intent * Application booklet * Concurrency Analysis * Land Development Code Section 20-8.9 Special Exceptions * Traffic Impact Study prepared by Richard Garcia & Associates, Inc. * Parking Study prepared by Richard Garcia & Associates, fnc. * Email from Juan Calderon of CAL TRAN Engineering Group, Inc. * Draft Ordinance approving the Zoning Map amendment * Copy of Applicant's Notification Letter and Affidavit of Mailing * Notice of Public Hearing * Legal Ad * Mailing Label Affidavit with Location Map (Property Owners within 500 Feet) dated 8/8/18 * Mailing Label Affidavit with Location Map (Abutting Property Owners) dated 8/8/17 * Excerpt of Planning Board meeting minutes, December 12, 2017 JKT Z:\Commission ltems\2018\04-03-20i8\6075 Sc~set\6075 Su~set s:a,' -,-,e-no 04032018 docx 38 22SE I NEIGHBORS I SUNDAY MARCH 25 1018 MIAMIHERALD.COM Pe~iodele!1 Mian1i Beach oceanfront rondo, ,nlrawastal v,ews, 2/2. $dJ9,000 Downtown Mi~mi, liirect knockout bay & ocean views. lbd/1.ba. 802 SF. $399.000 Public Meeting Notice East-West Corridor Rapid Transit ProJect SR 3361 Oo/1,!1ir1 Expr1 ss,,a, from M1 i1ni lntermod ii Cct1!( r (MICJ c1I \l1ilin1 fnternot1011ul l\irport 1'111f',l to SR 90 1 US <H/;W S th St·P.et c1t S1/V Hl9117 A\t::r7U,., Florida lntern.:-1tlonul Unl,ersll) 1f IU) The IJep;;,rtment of Transport~lion and Public Works (DTPW) has scheduled two Corridor Workshops For this project The st1J11y consls~'I or evaluating rapic, transl: allernalives. It "ill also includ~ transit stations/stops and park and-ride/transit tP.rminal facililles. The meedngs Will be held from 6 p.m. to 8 p,m. on: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 st Ooml•lc Catllollc Church 5909 NW 7'" Stroot Mlamt FL 33126 and Thursday. Aprll 12. 2018 FIU Modesto A. MahUque comp us Wertheim c..,..,r,,atory (WC! 130 11200 SW B"'Street Miami, FL 33199 MIAMl·rDE' mmm tA""' nr,,1.'n1,:1:i1•t• :•t fl·.._ ::-:.,,,.,,'l/; ir, ,;r./ir.,1...cl wrtt-!Jol ,..-,!,4rc< t!: ,,11~,:. c:o'or w,tit:nRI •Mlf.:"'· IIJ.~. iF-1·fllat. ,..,,t!!tn,•, ll1'.,1.,/1i•.t,· ,.., •:~mill' 'ii.JI••--· u,,~Mw.-,1 lu ,·~ ,,,,,vt.,itm .. ,,, rht ,t,r.,;.,,cnn~ "'"I Di•,rt~l•'•f";; A;r, ,1:t;r f"':'ff-(1" ff:ltl:irint, ·,r.~-, "'' ,,c.:t:tJn1m(l(l,;,t11J,u !u p{u1i~•o;dc· :·,1 m-s r,:1l1'k; ,111tt.~:fng i~ a1Jt~-d t<• <JIJ►ii,: :111.,1 ,lJfi.·••t.~,. ti' l~"O:;j / ;..'if~• l,r.:lcit,. U•~ 1.11,ll!i•: 11,i.'l"Mg l>yto,:Ui~t::l~' ;~IO'(Q~ 0,1::,g,l · i··~5J..i(:9,!,l2'j c11 ,r t'.•nilll(:OTPW. /IJJ •~\\' .l."C~ut'., J t I ltJC>t, :.11;.,m1, r.J. ·r?~-1'-i, ermJ/1. :~1nr:,:i-;.or1~,:,-"'~•nftimi:1DQ~.~'-'"· It :,n:1 1YJ'lt'~ iJ ,oP,N"ft i1:ir,('d;r-,P,1:.• l'Jt ,:,,: 11-?rct ~, h<:,,r:ng umn,e 1.i:r•r,1•· '.flt. ;),!f")Cl' -.. ~11~ tl,e f'<•f!.1."t Q,_::ar ~(~n-i<::<.'. 118001 ~5fi-/.li'7 L {TO!J., Cr ]{8(101 !1t;f, ~ l'i'(i (\lrtic'P.•. l°3 -.. :,;, #MiamiSMARTplan SMARTEastWest@mlamidade.gov ~www.mi.1mlSMARTpl.1n.com Detached duplex, reels like sinsle lam home. 2bd/2ba, 1500•· SF, $3100/mo. llpdated townhome in gated community. 2bdi2..5ba, 1400+ SF. S2400imo. CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI COURTESY NOTICE '.\.()"I J('J~ IS llf;Rt:Jf'i ~i"·,~n 1ha; lh(' City Crnmni,."i,,rr ,,1 lhl' Cil." ,,r Soulh ~1::imi. i-l•!!it.l,1 ,,ill "•1mlult Pnhli;: ll"•;inn~h,1 al iii-rc~ul:u (ii) Cumnu,.,11111 P'k"rlm~ k'h~Jubl Jin fu,•"-11,,y, Ap1il l. WI~, hc~111ning al -;-tllJ p rn .. 1111i"w (.11,· o,mmi,,il-n Ch:unh('r-., Ci! ~J ~u11 .. \•1 f)ri\'l!', lu..:un,,J,•r 1l1~ 1~1ll<•wing 11\•m1.,1 .\ Hn...1ti,1w11 =•1•ll1o11U:m.~ d1,,• t'1u M:•n.r,~•, It• •~1•1.:r lldll ii muhl-'I.NI :1•.'1r•:1m•11I In Iii•: p,in;Jt,1•,: .. 1 ii t .. _. \tl I·••:~•· ~-1•1111';,11 -1 !1 .. m T1J1n111:: I.C: 1.1.r· 1•11 :lw 11.,:1(·1• OrpJtll'h'III •\ 1t,• ... ,l•:l,11fl •'l'ilft•\ Ill~ ,1 ~!"1:1:lill 1:.w,Tll'<l1 \,1 .,~ It• ;1II••\• ,1 f•ru1\•~1 ,, 1111111 dh' llll)fl 1_)\Jt • ,.ii 1•1 ln!II\' 1h;m :1•111 1.!1 ,1°1i:·.-.1111! nl\lh' lh:u1 JU.•}jJIJ ,quah." ll"'=I :,,r •IA' 1•r• 1~11~ !•11..11,•11 .II MC"' S\\ i;! ',l(\"1'1 ,\ R!"•uhlll"II rd,•tlf·)' l,1 It 1•;1r1:u1,,: ;•r:•h,:,1:1,.11 11• r-:,h•u• 111\' o1.111•:111il ,,f lt'11111r•!',,I 11:•:1..llll! •J'l!t•·r,. t11r •• 111,;icr11•11• • ( .\11 C >r,1111,1111.:•· ,111n·11,J111~ lh•• 011~\·,.I! 7., ... 111c. M.1r: 01n1••r11l11~~ llt!· ,k,1~• .. ••••••: ,,I lh< lto••·h,·111 r, .. 1·11n11 ul lh,• r,r·•r·•11, l,·,·:•k:l:,1 h!li,;, S\\ :.-~•h•o:-:. lr,·m'Tt11101:0il\ -H h• 'lfll"(1IM\' :'ii'' -'\11 t)r.l111:1m-.• 1lfl•t••11!! :n1 :1111,"1111!11,•111 , .. 11i.: 1 ·••rn1""·•,...,,.,,"·•· 111:m h• :111·1."11111111· 111:,11, l.:u11l ,:"' t 111 l!u,, ·r.d,.• .:·111 ,·,,.•11 ~r:in··· :111111, •• 111...:ml 11"-· t·:\\ut,• L.1u:I I:,• !'-lol'j• .. 1th,· (',,111r1!."h.:ll\l•• Pl.111 h-11l.:11a1h llh! o1.fl::I hh.:.11,•d t111J,•r tli.: :i,1._•11,0::111. 11;\it1,h1tl! 1hr l.'11,lrdml' hnt ·,r p:t1k. :,, r:111 .,1 111.: f"11~ ·,. r'trk, :111,I Pr,•11 sr-.11.-.:. :nut ;\ud, .. n.i:111:: 11.tll'o-ollllill i.· 1111.• J'Jund:1 l>,•r,t1111•1.·111 ul fa,1,n,1111,· Orr,.•l'l•m1l~· :1url t:,•,j('~· ,'\p'lh,'I(')/ :\LL ,nl,•r"•~,MJ 1,;in1co;; ;tl"C in"·it-"<I t•> .tllt•nJ :111,I will hf' hi:m·J 1:,?r 1u11h,·1 i11h11n1.t1i,,11 ri'..•;N' l·~,111:1,·1 lln· t 'ny CkrL ·:-, Ollh~ o11· ;1n~-1,r!_,_,,~.m 1\,1;,r,,1 ,\I i\k11t~n,k1.. c·~·ll' cu.'" Ch·1k l'11r,rnt11: I•• fl,,i 1•!-1 :,:1.11ul\'" !!,C1, IJJII(, ll1i: <:11• rn•;,,t., :11h m•, •hi• r-;1t.h1 th:11 if .t l'h.'r""'" ,1,·,·uf,,,. ~,• :111rr:1I ,,11, 1l1°'1 •"i1•r1 111,11lt: lw llJI• U,•:thl. .-\1_'1'11t·1 ••: (',.1111J11~"'•••J1 .,,,11, •••• JWII 11• ,in~ 11r,11l(I \'•'ll~kl1•1s·1I ti JI~ 111•'1'1111~ •~I li1.•11•J11J', !11• ,,1 •h1.· 1\111 1:1.-.."!.I a ri•,·,..-,( ,,1 1111.• j'i•'H'C,IUIJ''· :i::11 lhnt l••t ,,,.-1, ll•IT•N', :1Qr..:11.••I Jl'l.'f . .:.•11111:1~· l\•'t•tl lt11.·1!'111,• l)!al :, ,..~•il•.1111n ft•.:1 11al ••f 1111,.• !'l•>t.:•:-lm~•, 1 ... 111;1.!1· \\0!.11 h 1•'\•-.i•I :n1:hrJ-:,-1b1.• 1•:,11111<•11\ .11:J ,., 1,h.•1111· u1~•11,,·lud11h1° JJ)l•r:11 i:-I•• ht· l1d ... .-,J 39 !\lil.J.\.f\lil DAiLY BUSINESS RE\l[EW c.·. :,:.~•;1~~'. iU1"·, 1.:-0 .:-.:,~: ~c::\•'(1i:: c:.1·,,:-• . ._'; STATE OF FLORIDA cour,Tv Of MIAMI-DADE: Be-'cre ~be t.w:d-?rs19'le:d at:1 1'lor!iy pe-:s.c,:1-1ih aji('.l:?are:'! KE.SH~, B.:. ~ '.;-UE. \',1l1c. 0,1 c>ath $ays ;:ha1 11 ~ 0 :-• s~ie-iS t.,c LEG . .:..L CLER:-.. i..ega1 !,iot:ce-~ nf i.he: r"~it-t!n, r.au\ :.'=t.siness f~ev,e\-\· 1'it:e fv'han11 Rev,e\•V. r-dEitiy 1_e:-:ce-pt. 5a:ur~!a;: SL1ndC.)1 and Lega! Holida)'!-.' r:ev,isoapt.=-c pubt~!',1;--j a! Miarn, in r,r.1a~11-Dade Cc-.. u1t}' Flonda t~a: !tiE-anachect C.~i''' of ad"ert,sef':le:1! t.•f'·ing c Leg,2 1 J:.dve:'!1ser~1i:-nt o* l•Joi1re-•• 1• Pic: ,na!?::::-rc! l'i0:°!CE OF FUEu..: tiEt.F.11.JG C:TY OF SC•UT.-1 f.Pi . .:..i✓ii -1.,,r:·R ;-:'G:t. 1,~ t"lc )~XX\: Cou:1 was publi~I 1eo i:, sa;ti newspaper In :I1e :s:-.. it!-o! :.ff•~·,! ! .. 1:t'·u::! $ay!-t•·:;1~ !!~e ~:.:d ~.::"·1e•r.-.s r,.e-"·~;.-;::ir~f-• tii.•r.•h!.~J·.et.i ai '"~m•~,-111 s:.a,,: f,t.1£1 1"'l1-~c1•.::i: C:-~:f.:11 c:,;__1:,t::~: an~ 1!if11 th':" <;C:•t! ... ,(•\".'E-(.•C:;•~! ! .c~ 1,eretcfo:e beer: c~n!,nt::.:1us1~, pi.rOi1sh~ ... ; m ~a,d :-.11iE:!n:. ::ac:10: C.ai.,Ph-r1n•.cta ea.:-.!~ i:iay 'E-•cep! Seturday ~-dn:fa,· a·,c :...,:-:9~! Hoi,:.iar:-) .. ;n~i has o,~ei-. e;:-.t>:rtd as-~er.o11:: ·=-'a~~ 111,11, :,~;::~~::,::/::a ::::,:~::~,'..~-~.:~12 ~'.:a:-1 ::~ 1:::::ttr-~0 ";,:;, -:.·eir~ vi ciO~·•if'"t~·t.:.r.ii:-n: a:.,? ~:rf,,m~ f .. ,r11-:er s:,vs Hiat 1·1€-o: s.t:r: , ,13S n€-!ll!lf··· l"'iud iiOC r,r;:,11".l~:":.1 2 :~)" o<:rsoc r,r:,1 ci~ ::£.,ipc.u·a11c,r. aj"l, d;sc.n .. :r'lt. re-t,al£:-cc··--111•isl:'•t"•11 o·· i ef .. i:~a fo, t'it-r.uroos-e r.'f s=-::unnp 1h,s. ud\•ei1,$E-r~1i::-r.! 10, n~1UiiCn!,C!'! u, thi:-sa•d :)E:·,\•S,pAp(,,f Swn.-,"I. !-·, t=:.':rl su~s~ribe:d Oi::fom me, t•us- 23 da't' c:' MARC 1--t /:,., D 2~J"1 S A-1·, t, ,.,_ . . . _,-7\ l-r!i ,, :.,1 r 1')'//-,1 i _., _.j --~ ,_... ·. t' , ./.., --..!r-.·-l ... -. ..... ·~ i.S£ . .;:., ~/ ._, LESH.'..: B..::.sr.u: r~:s.c1nally k'10\.\r. 10 me- .. .,, ::::,i J . ~ (> t~ t \.' ' @n'iiw @>, i@wv~ ,~an6-lll't'illi fJ@f?O~~ @Ir l@lfil!mllbQ© lXJ~!'IIR!HINl@ i~O-i!CE IS HERl::BY given that the City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida will conduct Public Hea1ing(s) at its regular City Commission meeting scheduled for Tuesday, April 3, 2018, beginning at 7:00 p.m., in tile City Commission Chambers, 6130 Sunset Drive. to consider the following iiem(s): · A Resolullon authorizing the City Manager to enter into a multi-year agreemeni fo1 the purchase of a Use of Force simulator from Training LE, LLC for the Pohce Departmeni. A Resolution approviny a Spec;al Exception so as to ailow a prujec. within the TODD (MU-Si. oi more than lour (4) stories and more than 40,000 square feet for the property located at 6075 SW 72nd Streei. />, Resolution relating to e variance application to reduce the amount o! required parking spaces for a mixed-use building located at 6075 SW 72nd Streel. ( An Ordinance amending the Official Zoning Map; amending the designation0 of the northern po1tion of the property localed at 6075 SW 72nd Street, from "TODD (MU-4)'' to "TODD (MU-5)". An Ordinance adopting an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to amend the future land use category "Parl1s and Open SpacP" and io amend the Future Land Use Map o1 the Comprehensive Pian, to identify ihe area located under the Metrorail. including 'the Underline linear park, as part of the City's Parks and Open Space. and Authorizing Transmittal to the Flo1ida Departmeni of Economic Opportunity and Review Agencies. ALL interested parties are invited to attend anc· will be heard. For further information, please contact lhe City Clerk's Office at: 305· 663-6340. Maria M. Menendez, CMG City Clerk Pursuant to Florida Statutes 286 0105, the Cit\' hereby advises the public that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by this Board, Agency or Commission wil11 respect to any matter considered at its meeting or hearing, he or she will need a record of the pi oceedings, and that for such purpose. affected person may neeci tc ensure that a verbatim record of the p1 oceeCiings 1s made which record inr:ludes the iesllmonir and evidence upo1, which the r,:ppeel is to be based :l/23 Hl-1 ·1510000305989•-1 40 RESOLUTION NO. 074-18-15107 A Resolution approving a Special Exception so as to allow a project within the TODD {MU-5) of more than four (4) stories and more than 40,000 square feet for the property located at 6075 SW 72nd Street. WHEREAS, the applicant, Alta Developers, LLC, submitted an application (number PB-17-033) requesting a Special Exception approval for a Large Scale Development for a mixed-use building located at 6075 SW 72 nd Street; and WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted concurrent requests to change the zoning of the northern portion of the site from TODD (MU-4) to TODD (MU-5) and for a Variance to reduce the number of required parking spaces; and WHEREAS, the site consists of 1.611 acres and the proposed development will provide 203 residential units, 2,441 square feet of commercial space, and 3,678 square feet of restaurant; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Land Development Code (LDC) Section 20-8.9 Special exceptions, any site that is in excess of 40,000 square feet or any development in excess of four (4) stories, shall be designated as a Large Scale Development and reviewed by the Planning Board and shall require approval by the City Commission; and WHEREAS, at its December 12, 2017 meeting, the Planning Board held a public hearing on the application, considered each of the requirements and conditions for Large Scale Development listed in Section 20-8.9 of the LDC, and voted four (4) to two (2) to recommend approval of the requested Special Exception; and WHEREAS, Section 20-8.9 (C) requires that all uses in a large scale development must comply with the following general requirements and any othe·r requirements that the City Commission may consider appropriate and necessary. 1. All such uses shall comply with all requirements established in the appropriate zoning use district, unless additional or more restrictive requirements are set forth below or by the City Commission. 2. All such uses must be of a compatible and complementary nature with any existing or planned surrounding uses. 3. The City Commission shall determine the overall compatibility of the development with the existing or planned surrounding uses. WHEREAS, Section 20-8.9 (C) requires that the development will: 1. Not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity of the proposed use; 2. Not be detrimental to the public welfare, property or improvements in the neighborhood; and 3. Complies with all other applicable Code provisions. 41 Res. No. 074-18-15107 WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami, having considered each of the Special Exception requirements and conditions and having found that those conditions have been met, desire to approve the application for the Special Exception. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1: The recitals set forth in this resolution are true and they are supported by competent substantial evidence and they are incorporated into this resolution by reference as if set forth in full herein. Section 2. The application (number PB-17-033) submitted by Alta Developers, LLC, requesting a Special Exception for a Large Scale Development for a mixed-use building consisting of commercial, restaurant and residential uses within the TODD (MU-5) zoning district located at 6075 SW 72 nd Street, South Miami, Florida, complies with the requirements of 20-8.9 (C) and (D) and is hereby approved with the following conditions: General Conditions 1. Any development of the property will be in substantial compliance with the documents submitted, including: Letter of Intent from Ines Marrero-Priegues dated August 11, 2017; Application Book consisting of a survey prepared by Fortun, Leavy, Skiles, Inc. dated 7 /27 /17; Site Photographs (Sheet CP-1.0); Renderings dated 11/14/17 (Sheets R-1.0 through R-1.5); Aerial Photos of the site (Sheet CP-2.0); a Zoning Chart dated 8/11/17 (Sheet A-0.1); an Area Schedule dated 9/20/17 (Sheet A- l.OD); Floor and Roof Plans (Sheets A-1.01 through 1.07); building elevations (Sheets A-2.01 and A- 2.02); a building section drawing (Sheet A-3.01); and Planter Details (Sheet A-4.0) all signed and sealed by Roberto Behar (9-20-17); and a Tree Disposition Plan dated 10/10/17 (Sheet TD-1) and landscape plans (Sheets L-1 through L-4) dated 8/8/17 prepared by Witkin Hults Design Group; and a Traffic Impact Study and Parking Study both prepared by Richard Garcia & Associates. 2. All documents submitted with this application are to be made part of the record. 3. Any improvements in the Public Right-of-Way shall be approved by the applicable agency (FDOT, Miami-Dade County and/or City of South Miami). 4. All impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permit. 5. The Applicant shall provide a letter acknowledging compliance with the applicable Level of Services requirements prior to the issuance of final permit to the property. If any concurrency approvals expire a re-review shall be required by the appropriate agency. 6. Any changes that increase densities, intensities or population shall require a new Concurrency Analysis. 7. Applicant shall submit verification from Miami-Dade County that the proposed new development has been reviewed and approved for all access management considerations prior to site plan approval. 8. Flood elevations shall be reviewed and approved for consistency with FEMA requirements and the City's National Insurance Flood Program Ordinance prior to building permit approval. 9. The Applicant shall comply with applicable conditions and requirements by Miami-Dade County Public Works Department, Fire Rescue Department, Department of Regulatory and Economics Resources -DERM (DRER), Miami-Dade County Water and Sewer Department, and FDOT. Page 2 o:= 4 42 Res. No. 074-18-15107 10. The Applicant shall execute and record in the public records of Miami-Dade County, a Development Agreement and a Maintenance Covenant, in a form approved by the City Commission and City Attorney, which complies with the requirements of Land Development Code Section 20-8.9 and which contains all commitments made and conditions imposed as part of the approval of the Applications. The development agreement shall be enforceable for ten (10) years from the date of substantial completion as defined in Section 20-8.9. 11 Applicant shall comply with all requirements set forth in Section 20-8.9 in addition to those set forth in this Resolution unless there is a conflict, in which event Section 20-8.9 shall take precedent. 12. If during the review process it is determined that the development, as proposed, will potentially cause adverse impact, the Planning Department shall recommend remedial measures to eliminate or reduce, to the extent possible, these impacts. Development projects that are recommended for remedial measures will not be required to submit a new application unless it is determined by the Department that additional changes which would have the effect of increasing densities, square footage or altering the height or use of a Development have been made. Remedial measures may include, but are not limited to: i. Additional screening or buffering; ii. Additional landscaping; iii. Building orientation; iv. Relocation of proposed open space, or alteration of the use of such space; v. Pedestrian and bicycle safety and access; vi. Changes to ingress and egress; vii. Addressing traffic flow to and from the development to avoid intrusion on local streets in nearby single family residential areas; or viii. Improvement of the streets adjacent to the project, if applicable. Construction General Conditions 13. A Construction and Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) Plan shall be provided by the Applicant to the Public Works Departments for approval prior to start of construction. Access points by construction vehicles shall be provided within the MOT. 14. The Applicant shall provide a Construction Air Quality Management Plan to the Department prior to the start of construction. 15. A Construction, Demolition and Materials Management Plan (CDMMP) must be submitted by the Applicant at time of building permit. 16. Construction shall only take place Monday through Friday during the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Parking Conditions A parking adjustment has been approved, permitting a total of 303 on-site parking spaces. A minimum of 203 of the on-site spaces will be designated for the 203 residential units within the project (to be assigned in the lease agreements). Residential parking decals and parking cards will be issued to tenants for the vehicle to be parked in the residential parking area, which shall be segregated from the commercial/visitor parking area by a card-only access mechanical gate. A minimum of one decal shall be issued to each rental unit. Tenant vehicles that are found parked in this commercial/visitor parking area shall be towed, and towing shall be conducted by an authorized towing company to a towing company storage facility in accordance with Florida law. Page 3 of 4 43 Res. No. 074-18-15107 Landscaping 17. The Applicant shall meet all of the minimum requirements of the City Code, Chapters 18 and 24 of the Miami-Dade County Code and specifically comply with all conditions imposed by Miami-Dade County Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources - DERM (DRER}, if any. 18. The property shall be landscaped in accordance with the landscape plan, included with the site plan submittal, and approved by the Environmental Review and Preservation Board. 19. Pursuant to Sec. 20-4.5 and 20-4.5.1, as may be amended, the Applicant shall provide mitigation for all trees to be removed in accordance with City requirements. Environmental 20. The Applicant shall meet the requirements of the Miami-Dade County Water-Use Efficiency Standards Manual, effective January 2009, as may be amended from time to time. 21. All storm water drainage systems shall be maintained in working order at all times to avoid localize flooding during and after a storm. Parking shall be prohibited on top of any drainage inlet or drainage manhole. Architecture 22. Final approval of all plans must be obtained from the Environmental Review and Preservation Board, as required by Code. Section 3. Severability. If any section clause, sentence, or phrase of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, the holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this resolution. Section 4. Effective Date. This resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption by vote of the City Commission. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of, -'--A=p=r::..:1::..:· l=---__ ___,, 2018. ~ ~ APPROVED:,..-& J/1 -~~~~ rJAYOR COMMISSION VOTE: 5-0 Mayor Stoddard: Yea Vice Mayor Harris: Yea Commissioner Gil: Yea Commissioner Liebman: Yea Commissioner Welsh: Yea Page 4 of 4 44 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM To: The Honorab.le Mayor & Members of the City Commission V1A: Steven J. Alexander, City Manager FROM: Jane K. Tompkins, AICP, Planning and Zoning Direct.7f.J DATE: March 20, 2018 SUBJECT: An Ordinance amending the Official Zoning Map; amending the designation of the northern portion of the property located at 6075 SW 72nd Street, from "TODD (MU-4)" to "TODD (MU- S)". . A Resolution approving a Special Exception so as to allow a project within the TODD {MU-5} of more than four (4) stories and more than 40,000 square feet for the property located av;o1s SW 72 nd Street. A Resolution relating to a variance application to reduce the amount of required parking spaces for a mixed-use building located at 6075 SW 72nd Street. BACKGROUND: The property known as 6075 Sunset Drive is 1.6-acres in size and has frontages on SW 72 nd Street, SW 61st Avenue, and SW 71st Street; it makes up approximately one-half ofthe block. Currently, it's developed with a 20,371 sq. ft. multi-story office building and surface parking lot. The southeast corner of the lot is open space and there are several mature trees on the site. According to the City's Official Zoning Map, the property is zoned both TODD (MU-4) "Transit- Oriented Development District {Mixed-Use 4)" and TODD (MU-5) "Transit-Oriented Development District (Mixed-Use 5)", with the lot being split roughly in half north to south. The Future Land Use Map designation for the property is TODD (4+4 Story), which is consistent with both zoning districts. 45 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 2 of 13 PROJECT PROPOSAL Property Location Alta Developers, LLC, (the "applicant"), has submitted three (3) applications for the property: (1) a zoning map amendment for the northern portion of the property, changing it from TODD MU- 4 to TODD MU-5; {2) a special exception for a large-scale development of more than 40,000 square feet and four (4) stories; and (3) a variance to reduce the number of required parking spaces. The application package, which includes, among other things, the application, the letter of intent, a survey with legal description, renderings, a zoning chart, floor plans and roof plan (pages A-1 .. 01 through A-1.07), elevations of the four fa~ades (pages A-2.01 and A-2.02), a Tree Disposition Plan (sheet TD-1) and landscape plans (pages L-1 through L-4) is provided as an Attachment. If the applications are approved, the applicant will demolish the existing improvements and develop a multi-story, mixed-use (commercial/residential) building. Comm~rcial space, consisting of 3,678 square feet of restaurant and 2,441 square feet of retail uses, will be located on the ground floor of the Sunset Drive fa~ade, and wrap around the corner of the building to also face onto SW 61 st Avenue. JKT Z:\Commission ltems\2018\04-03-2018\6075 Sunset\6075 Sunset staff memo 04032018.docx 46 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 3 of 13 A total of 203 residential units will be located on the upper levels of the building and the ground floor level of the northern portion of the building. The unit mix consists of town homes, studios, and one-, two-, and three-bedroom units of varying sizes as follows: BREAKDOWN OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS Unit Type Number of Units Average Size Unit Mix(%) (SF) 1 Bedroom 102 738 50% 2 Bedrooms 72 1,077 35 3 Bedrooms 8 1,433 4 Studio 14 566 7 Townhomes 7 931 3 UNIT TOTAL 203 100 Six of the town home units will be located on the ground floor adjacent to SW 71 st Street and the seventh adjacent 61 st Avenue. These units will be accessed from both the ground floor parking area and from the right-of-way. Tenant amenities including a dog park, pool deck, and common areas are provided on the upper levels of the building. A total of 303 on-site parking spaces will be provided to serve the building. Access to the parking garage is obtained via SW 71 st Street and parking makes up the second through fifth levels of the northern portion of the building. Ground-level parking and loading areas are accessed via 61 st Avenue. The building will be eight (8} stories in height along Sunset Drive and step down to fifty-two (52) feet along 71 st Street. APPLICATION REQUESTS The applicant has submitted three zoning applications: (1) a zoning map amendment from TODD (MU-4) to TODD (MU-5); (2} a Special Exception to allow a large-scale development of more than four stories and 40,000 square feet; and (3) a Variance to allow a reduction in the number of parking spaces. 1. Zoning Map Amendment TODD (MU-4) to TODD (MU-5} In order to develop the proposed mixed-use building, the northern portion of the property must be rezoned from TODD (MU-4) to TODD (MU-5). Excerpts of the existing and proposed zoning map are provided below: JKT Z:\Commission ltems\2018\04-03-2018\6075 Sunset\6075 Sunset staff memo 04032018.docx 47 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 4of 13 Proposed Zoning Map Per the LDC, the TODD's purpose is to maximize the presence of the mass transit center that's within walkin~g distance of the districts' boundaries. The district is made up of five (5) subcategories and it's intended to provide for the development of office uses, office services, office-related retail, retail, retail services, and residential uses in multi-story and mixed use projects that are characteristic of transit-oriented developments (Sec. 20-3.1(6)(16)). TODD MU-4 and TODD MU-5 are both described as "mixed use". The major difference between the two categories is in the allowable building height. MU-4 is limited to two stories. MU-5, on the other hand, requires a minimum oftwo stories with four stories allowed by right; up to eight stories are allowed if the building is designed in a way that makes it eligible for certain bonuses. These height bonuses are discussed in more detail in the discussion on the Special Exception request. There are also minor differences between MU-4 and MU-5 in the types of uses permitted: banks and saving institutions are allowed by-right in MU-5 and reupholstery and furniture repair is allowed as a special use in MU-5. Neither use is allowed in MU-4. Further, free- standing garages are allowed in MU-5, but not MU-4. As shown on the excerpt of the Zoning Map, above, the MU-4 district makes up essentially the northern half of the lots between SW 59 th Place and SW 61 st Court. This enclave of MU-4 is surrounded by MU-5, Medium Intensity Office (MO) and TODD (Pl). The mixed-use TODD and MO district are very similar in terms of land uses allowed, with the main differences being that MO doesn't allow the range of residential dwelling types or the retail uses found in the TODD. The table below provides the dimensional standards for the three districts: Comparison of Dimensional Requirements TODD (MU-4) TODD (MU-5) MO Minimum Size NA NA 10,000 sq. ft. Frontage NA NA 100' JKT Z:\Commission ltems\2018\04-03-2018\6075 Sunset\6075 Sunset staff memo 04032018.docx 48 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 5 of 13 Setback Front Vary based on Vary based on 15* Rear location location 10 Side (Interior) 0 Side {Street) 10 Between Buildings 20 Maximum Height 2 stories/28' 2 stories minimum/4 4 stories/SO' story maximum; up to 8 stories with bonuses per Sec. 20- 8.10 Building Coverage NA NA NA- Impervious NA NA 85% Coverage FAR NA NA 1.6 As both MO and TODD (MU-5) allow for greater building heights and similar uses, the requested zoning change would not be incompatible. Staff has also reviewed the City's Comprehensive Plan and determined the requested rezoning furthers the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and, more specifically, the following goals and policies of the Future Land Use element: JKT Policy 1.1.2 In reviewing proposed amendments to this plan and the Zoning Map, compatibility with adjacent uses shall be the major determinant. Goal 3 To achieve a tax base adequate to support a high level of municipal services via increased mixed-use projects and flexible building heights in designated Transit Oriented Development Districts {TODD), to the extent that development and redevelopment in these districts does not adversely impact surrounding neighborhoods and uses. Policy 3.1.1 Zone for new development and redevelopment in accordance with the Future Land Use Map, including multi-story and mixed-used districts. Policy 3.1.4 The City of South Miami encourages development and redevelopment in the Transit-Oriented Development District. Existing streetscape widths along SW 62 Avenue and Sunset Drive will permit increased building heights that are aesthetically-pleasing. The City encourages transparent street-level retail with a mix of retail services, office uses, office services, and residential uses in mixed-use and multi-story projects, as well as encouraging a district-wide mix of land uses via multiple projects. Z:\Commission ltems\2018\04-03-2018\6075 Sunset\6075 Sunset staff memo 04032018.docx 49 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 6of 13 Finally, a concurrency analysis (see attachment} was completed to determine compliance with the various Level of Services standards. The standards will be satisfied by the proposed project. 2. Special Exception for a Large-Scale Development The applicant's second request is for approval of special exception for large-scale development. Pursuant to the TODD regulations (Sec. 20-8.9 Special Exceptions), any site larger than 40,000 square feet or any development taller than four (4) stories shall be designated as a Large-Scale Development and reviewed under the Special Exception provisions of the Code. The proposed project exceeds both thresholds. Essentially, this section provides conditions and design requirements that a project must satisfy for approval; it is provided in its entirety as an Attachment. Staff Observations Based on Section 20-8.9 _ 1. Residential uses are not permitted on the first floor within that portion of the building fronting on the main street. The phrase "main street" means the thoroughfare that abuts the property line of the development and which has the most traffic, as compared to any other street that abuts the property. The proposed project includes first floor residential on SW 61 st and SW 71 st. As these roadways do not have as much traffic as Sunset Drive~ the project complies with this requirement. 2. The proposed uses are of a compatible and complementary nature with the existing and planned surrounding uses. The property is surrounded by buildings of various heights and land uses, including retail, office, a private club, a school and a mixed-use building. JKT Z:\Commission ltems\2018\04-03-2018\6075 Sunset\6075 Sunset staff memo 04032018.docx 50 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 7 of 13 Comparison with Surrounding Properties Land Use Zoning Property Office TODD MU-4 and TODD MU-5 North Office MO East Commercial TODD MU-4 and TODD MU-5 South City Hall and Miami-Dade TODD-Pl County Library West Multi-family residential, TODD MU-4, TODD MU-5 Office, and Private Club and MO 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity nor will it be detrimental to the public welfare, property or improvements in the neighborhood. 4. The MU-5 district allows four stories by right, and up to four more under Section 20-8.10 Bonus a/locations, as follows: Action Bonus For every one (1) floor of residential use One (1) additional floor of residential use with the minimum parking requirement (two (2) cars per residential use) Public plaza-min. five thousand (5,000) sq. ft. One {1) additional floor and art work in plaza setting Develop full frontage with street-design as One (1) additional floor part of pedestrian walkway system Develop "cross-thru's" from street to public One (1) additional floor open space system as part of pedestrian walk- system, on owner's property (maintenance required in Section 20-8.15) With three levels of residential, the project is entitled to an additional three floors. The full- frontage street design al~ng Sunset Drive entitles the project to a fourth bonus floor, bringing the total project to a height of eight (8) stories. The far;:ade proposed for SW 71 st Street is only fifty-two (52) feet in height, which is comparable to the four stories/fifty (SO) feet limit of the MO district across the street. JKT Z:\Commission ltems\2018\04-03-2018\607!:i Sunset\6075 Sunset staff memo 04032018.docx 51 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 8 of 13 5. The project must comply with other applicable Code provisions, including the TODD Regulating Plan. The Regulating Plan classifies streets in the district as either Main or M.inor; and further provides design standards such as the location and dimensions of build-to lines and requirements for awnings or arcades based on these street types. The site plan for this property, which is challenged by having three (3) street frontages, was designed to comply with the regulations for a Main Street (i.e., Sunset Drive), which is treated as the front of the building. Further, the facades along SW 61st Avenue and SW 71st Street, which are designated as Minor Streets, are treated as the side. of the building. The building lacks the required awning or arcade on the north elevation but staff notes that the townhouse type residential units do not lend themselves to an awning or arcade, and that the landscap.ed areas in front of the units and the street trees will serve the same purpose as an arcade. Finally, Staff notes that the building at the east end of the block which also has frontage on three (3) streets, treats the71st Street fa~ade as the rear of the structure and lacks an arcade or awning. Staff recommends that this be resolved with the Environmental Review and Preservation Board during their review. 6. The Traffic Impact Study and the Parking Study prepared.by Richard Garcia & Associates, Inc., were reviewed on behalf of the City by Juan Calderon of CALTRAN Engineering Group, Inc. Mr. Calderon determined that the studies were acceptable (please see Attachments). 7. A Development Agreement and a Maintenance Covenant shall be prepared and approved by the Commission, in accordance with Section 20-8.9(1) and (J). 3. Variance to reduce the total number of parking spaces The final application is for a variance to reduce the required number of off-street parking spaces for the proposed development. As designed, the project has 303 spaces on-site and gets credit for eleven (11) spaces on the adjacent streets for a total of 314 spaces. With 203 residential units and 6,119 square feet of ground floor commercial/retail space, the project would be required to provide a total of 466 ?paces: JKT Residential: 2 spaces per unit plus 1 visitor space per 10 units (203 X 2} + (203/10) = 406 + 21 = 427 Retail: 1 space per 300 sq. ft. gross floor area 2,441/300 = 9 Restaurant: 1/100 sq. ft. of patron area plus 1/300 of non-patron area 2,452/100 = 25 1,226/300 = 5 TOTAL: 427 + 9 + 25 + 5 = 466 Z:\Commission ltems\2018\04-03-2018\6075 Sunset\6075 Sunset staff memo 04032018.docx 52 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 9 of 13 With 466 spaces required and 314 provided, the project has a deficit of 152 spaces. The applicant proposes providing the required spaces for the retail and restaurant uses and the required visitor spaces, but reducing the residential parking to 1.3 spaces per unit for 275 residential spaces. Pursuant to Section 20-5.9 of the LDC, a variance for off-street parking can be reviewed and permitted by the City Commission at a public hearing, after a recommendation by the Planning Board. Variance decisions shall be based on an affirmative finding as to each of five criteria presented below along with Staff's findings. Please note that the Applicant's letter of intent includes their comments on how each of the criteria are satisfied. JKT 1. The variance is necessary to relieve particular extraordinary conditions relating to a specific property; Staff Response: The LDC requires properties in the TODD to have their parking located at the side or rear of the building, so street frontages can be developed with uses that maximize the pedestrian experience. Since this property has three street frontages all three have retail/restaurant and/or residential uses. Those liner uses result in the parking being limited to a smaller area of the ground level and the upper levels. With the four-story height limit of the MO district to the north, and to limit its bulk, the building is not designed to the full permitted height. These considerations result in even less space being available for parking and the inability to comply with the code requirements for parking. 2. Denial of the variance would result in hardship to the owner. Hardship results if the restriction of the zoning ordinance, when applied to a particular property, becomes arbitrary, confiscatory or unduly oppressive because of conditions of the property that distinguish it from other properties under similar zoning restrictions; Staff Response: One hundred sixteen units, or over half of the total, are either studio apartments or one-bedroom units. Imposing the code required parking of two (2) spaces per unit for these small units, seems unduly oppressive. 3. The extraordinary conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant; Staff Response: The condition of having three (3) adjacent streets is not the result of an action of the applicant. Z:\Commission ltems\2018\04-03-2018\6075 Sunset\6075 Sunset staff memo 04032018.docx 53 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 10 of 13 4. The requested variance is the minimum variance necessary to make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure; Staff Response: Given the mix of unit sizes, the cost of the -additional parking and the impact of the additional floors on the building's design, the variance requested is the minimum necessary to make possible the reasonable use of the land. 5. That the approval of the variance will be in consistent with the general intent and purpose of the Land Development Code, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Staff Response: Allowing a reduction in parking in the urban area close to the Metrorail, shopping and employment centers is consistent with the general intent and purpose of the LDC and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or detrimental to the public welfare. It is worth noting that it's common in development regulations to provide lower ratios for smaller units such as studios, and for transit oriented projects such as this one. Further, the Parking Study prepared by Richard Garcia & Associates demonstrates that the proposed parking will be sufficient for the needs of the development. PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION Following a public hearing on December 12, 2017, the Planning Board voted as follows to recommend approval of the applications, inclusive of staff's recommended conditions listed below, and the following additional conditions: (1) ensure that the Landscape Plan comply with the mitigation requirements of the LDC; and (2) the applicant to consider a minimum of four (4) units of affordable housing via a covenant. 1) Zoning Map Amendment from TODD (MU-4) to TODD (MU-5): Vote: six ayes, two nays (2) Special Exception to allow a project of more than four {4} stories and more than 40,000 square feet in size: · Vote: six ayes, two nays (3) Variance to reduce the amount of required parking: Vote: six ayes, two nays JKT 2:\Commission ltems\2018\04-03-2018\6075 Sunset\6075 Sunset staff memo 04032018.docx 54 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 11 of 13 STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND CONDITIO.NS OF APPROVAL Staff recommends approval, with the conditions listed below, of the proposed changes: (1) an amendment to the Official Zoning Map changing the designation from TODD MU-4 to TODD MU- S for the northern portion of the property; (2) a Special Exception to allow a large-scale development; and (3) a Variance to reduce the required number of parking spaces. General Conditions 1. -Any development of the property will be in substantial compliance with the documents submitted including: Letter of Intent from Ines Marrero-Priegues dated August 11, 2017; Ap·plication Book consisting of a survey prepared by Fortun, Leavy, Skiles, Inc. dated 7 /27 /~7; Renderings dated 9/20/17 (Sheets R-1.0 through R-1.2), Site Photographs (Sheets CP-1.0 and CP- 2.0); a Zoning Chart dated 8/11/17 (Sheet A-0.1) a site plan data sheet (A-1.00); Floor and Roof Plans (Sheets A-1.00 through 1.07); building elevations (Sheets A-2.01 and A-2.02}; a building section drawing (Sheet A-3.01); and Planter Details (Sheet A-4.0) all signed and sealed by Roberto Behar (9-20-17); and a Tree Disposition Plan dated 10/10/17 (Sheet TD-1} and landscape plans (Sheets L-1 through L-4) dated 8/8/17 prepared by Witkin Hults Design Group; and a Traffic Impact Study and Parking Study both prepared by Richard Garcia & Associates. 2. All documents submitted with this application are to be made part of the record. 3. Any improvements in the Public Right-of-Way shall be approved by the applicable agency (FOOT, Miami-Dade County and/or City of South Miami}. 4. All impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permit. 5. The Applicant shall provide a letter acknowledging compliance with the applicable Level of Services requirements prior to the issuance of final permit to the property. If any concurrency approvals expire a re-review shall be required by the appropriate agency. 6. Any changes that increase densities, intensities or population shall require a new Concurrency Analysis. 7. Applicant shall submit verification from Miami-Dade County that the proposed new development has been reviewed and approved for all access management considerations prior to site plan approval. 8. Flood elevations shall be reviewed and approved for consistency with FEMA requirements and the City's National Insurance Flood Program Ordinance prior to building permit approval. JKT Z:\Commission ltems\2018\04-03-2018\6075 Sunset\6075 Sunset staff memo 04032018.docx 55 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 12 of 13 9. The Applicant shall comply with applicable conditions and requirements by Miami-Dade County Public Works Department, Fire Rescue Department, Department of Regulatory and Economics Resources -DERM (DRER), Miami-Dade County Water and Sewer Department, and FOOT. 10. The Applicc!nt shall execute and record in the public records of Miami-Dade County, a Development Agreement and a Maintenance Covenant, in a form approved by the City Commission and City Attorney, which complies with the requirements of Land Development Code Section 20-8.9. 11. The Applicant shall execute and record in the public records of Miami-Dade County, a restrictive covenant, in a·form approved by and subject to the review and approval of the City Manager and City Attorney, which contains all commitments made and conditions imposed as part of the approval of the Applications. Construction General Conditions 12. A Construction and Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) Plan shall be provided by the Applicant to the Public Works Departments for approval prior to start of construction. Access points by construction vehicles shall be provided within the MOT. 13. The Applicant shall provide a Construction Air Quality Management Plan to the Department prior to the start of construction. 14. A Construction, Demolition and Materials Management Plan (CDMMP) must be submitted by the Applicant at time of building permit. 15. Construction shall only take place Monday through Friday during the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Landscaping 16. The Applicant shall meet all of the minimum requirements of the City Code, Chapters 18 and 24 of the Miami-Dade County. Code and specifically comply with all conditions imposed by Miami-Dade County Department of ·Regulatory and Economic Resources - DERM (DRER), if any. 17. The property shall be landscaped in accordance with the landscape plan, included with the site plan submittal, and approved by the Environmental Review and Preservation Board. 18. Pursuant to Sec. 20-4.5, as may be amended, the Applicant shall provide mitigation for all trees to be removed in accordance with City requirements. JKT Z:\Commission ltems\2018\04-03-2018\607S Sunset\6075 Sunset staff memo 04032018.docx 56 Alta Developers UC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 13 of 13 Environmental 19. The Applicant shall meet the requirements of the Miami-Dade County Water-Use Efficiency Standards Manual, effective January 2009, as may be amended from time to time. 20. All storm water drainage systems shall be maintained in working order at all times to avoid localize flooding during and after a storm. Parking shall be prohibited on top of any drainage inlet or drainage manhole. Architecture 21. Final approval of all plans must be obtained from the Environmental Review and Preservation Board, as required by Code. ATTACHMENTS: * Application Package * Application * Letter of intent * Application booklet * Concurrency Analysis * Land Development Code Section 20-8.9 Special Exceptions * Traffic Impact Study prepared by Richard Garcia & Associates, Inc. * Parking Study prepared by Richard Garci~ & Associates, Inc. * Email from Juan Calderon of CAL TRAN Engineering Group, Inc. * Draft Ordinance approving the Zoning Map amendment * Copy of Applicant's Notification Letter and Affidavit of Mailing * Notice of Public Hearing * Legal Ad * Mailing Label Affidavit with Location Map (Property Owners within 500 Feet) dated 8/8/18 * Mailing Label Affidavit with Location Map (Abutting Property Owners) dated 8/8/17 * Excerpt of Planning Board meeting minutes, December 12, 2017 JKT Z:\Commission ltems\2018\04-03-2018\6075 Sunset\607S Sunset staff memo 04032018.docx 57 22SE I I NEIGHBORS I. SUNDAY MARCH 25 2018 MIAMIHERALD.COM . Remodeled Miami Beach oceanfront condo, intracoastal views, 2/2, $419,000 Downtown Miami, direct knockout bay & ocean views. lbd/1ba, 802 SF, $399,000 Public Meeting Notice East-Wes, C<:m,dor r,ap,cJ Trc1ns1t P1oi0ct St?<•:G O,lrt nt 1,r ,,1><,'r•i11\•1 1111ltt rriHr1 11C--. 'lr 1',1IC 1 i\l11ntfnt,rn-11",:,I ·'\, port l >'Ji\ lo SR 90 u~ I J SW 3ttt Strf'e ,. ~1:• J c:f~ Al f: ... U0 Ficr1d J lnlr'r;i .. •lon 1: U1 1v1 n,1ty :;:1u, The Department of Transportation and Public Works (DTPW) 'has scheduled two Corridor Workshops for this project. The study consists of'eveluatlng rapid transit alternatives. It \\ill also include transit stations/slops and park-am}rlde/tr,:inslt terminal facilities. The meetings wftl be Jleld from 6 p.m. to 8 p,m. on: Tuesday, Aprll 10, 201!1 SL Domlplc Catholic Churdl S909NW.,..Stn,et Mlam~ FL33126 and Thursday, AprU 12, 20:IB FIU Modesto A, Maldlque Campus Wertheim Conservatory (WC)':l.30 woe sw &'"Street Miami, FL 33199 MIAMl•P mmmra P.,bric pa,ticipB:tor, at 1his meetlr,g ls solicitP.ff wfthoul ~tJRrtl to race. col'or, notiontill orit)rt, ap, gender, religioto .. disabfi1tr or '""'"r status. P.un;uant 10 th~ provfsiol\♦ of the America,tS will, Disat,iliries Ael, any p_emo,, ,equirlr'lf s.oeelat eccommodat,o,1a fO pal'fk:lpale In thr& pub[lc mee,lng la uslcsd Co ad'llsa tht; a{lency i.tl feast 7 da,-1, befote the public meet&)if byC'Oilfai:11:ig: t~s Otte;ga • (186} 46~5225 or iri writing; OTPW. 701-NW•iA cour.:, 17 Ploot; Miami. Fi. 331.'36, email: Mim:os.Q'teg.,llmiamldade.gov. II you nave a s,>eP.Cn Impediment a, are /1ard at hearifll pJease crmrct!'.'! roeaget,cy ~ tlie F'klrf;Je Relay Semte, 1{800)_ 955-8771 (TOO) er 11800) 955-BTiO (Voice). 11 "!JI #M;amiSI\IIARTplan SMARTl:astWest@mlamldade.gov Giwww.mlamlSMARTplan.co111 Detached duplex, feels like single fam home. 2bd/2ba, 1500+ SF, $3100/mo. Updated townhome in gated communlt\'. 2bd/2.5ba, 1400+ SF, $2400/mo. CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI COURTESY NOTICE NOTICE JS HEREtn.· given lb.ti 1hr Ci1y Conuni~$illn or rhc Cily ,,r S,mth )1i;uni, flurid:, will \.'t1n!.lut·t Publk Hraringt~l :ti iU, rognl.lr Ci1y Cnmmission me:c1int?~IK'duJed rnrTu.:!1Jay, AJ)lil 3, 2lllS, bcginnin~ at 7:00 p.m .. in lh\· Chy Comrni~~icn Ch:unhtH'!'!,:, r;J 30 Sun~t Driv.:, to cun.,;,idt'r 1ht fullnwiny-ilern(~>: A NtS1,li11im, :cuth1,ril,l11~ ,h~• C.it>· M11n:it!i:r 10 c:111u, inln za wuJti•J\'lJr lll!lrucrncnt fer the in•rch.-u,c .,r il l:i,.-e "'r f,nc.,: 11imula1011111111 Truin1n~ LE, LI.C: rorthc P.1lh:r-Dc-1t.U1n'll.'"hl. ( A Rr:,,1luliau n111n11¥i111, n $Jtt1,.illl .E:\CCJ:tfi.11n ,i11 :1:i.11, aU,,w 11 pJ\~jce1 wjtbln the TUDf.l (MU·!iJ ul mnrc d1:tn four \41 i,:tmk~ n11d more than .l(l,flOO 31:111a1c feel l(lr ll.._. 1"''1""''>' li,.:-:i.tt"tl :U 607:S SW 7~ Street. A ~,h1li1121 n•bllihft II) II 1'1\lhlll\"\" 11rpt1..:n1,-ii1 ,., rt'CIPrr lhr-:\11111\IIJI ,,r required p11dU11g 1,p:11:C\ ro, R mi.-tcJ-U!i-C ti111.hJiPg lvc.1100 at f.117'.i SW 7ZW SUl't'I. A11 On.liu.un:e a1nrll,li11s llll" Olliri,I! 7.oni11g M11p; ;111li."11din,c: tlti: dfJti,:n.lliuu ;,r 1hr nl'>ffhrrn pmi.111 11( list Vl't'l"-'n)' hw:11l'd ill IS07$ SW 72-Str .. ~l. rmm ··TODD iMU-4J" 1111'.()Dll CMll·Sl". All Onli1r.tnl'C :1cl11pling Ith tnncml111t11\ 1,·, lltt C'cm1rreJ1i!n.,1w Pl:tn 1,, IA11Cffd lht! future J:iud UM' t'i\lC'!!•'IY '•P;ub 11IICI Op.:11 Sp.'tCC .. and le, :1111.:nd lhl• F\IIUTe 1.,'\Q\l ll!ft M1ql "' 1111.' Ct\11!pn:ho1sh·~ Pinn.,,. 1Lla111ry ,,~ atr:l ""'':it1.'1I u11Jcr tire Mcln•rml. induJIPit lhc UndcrJinc-linear ;,:irk. as p.ut 111' the Citf!t Pnrk.111 and OJ,\.--n Sp11cr, and A11thori1.ln.; l"Jnu1ArriUnl In lltr FJ,.rld:11>.:p.,mtttnl ,,J E\:l'll\tJUi\" Or(,1111u1111y aml Rr-,·ir,v Agc11';i\,:. ALI.. hnrrcr.tl!d p.trtics :lit' invitt•d·to il11t'rnl and will tie heard. f11r rurthcr infunn111i,m, pico~ L"L.1'11:h.:I the Ci1y Clerk"s om .. ·c at: 305-fiF.3-6340. Maria M. McncnJ,~1.. CMC Ci1yCl,·rk run-1mnl hi Flnrt,L, Sl!tl11(,•,i :H6.1>1ns, lhc Cily hcl\il)" mM!l'Cs lilt' rutiltt' 1h::1t ir ii p.-r.i,•n llrtid1.•~ Ill :ll1(1Clt) :i11y ,led"iun made hy d,,,. IJC1:u .. ). A!'('nc)· nr c,-.nmi~"ii.,n ~·i1h n·,r,.,·1 tc, .m)· inaller l:n11"1J~ret1 at i~· mt1."HnJc 11r bc:;,:Eing. be "" she wlJI 11""1."1.1 a "'-",rd ,,r d11: rr,1u.~Ji111,:, :end Ila.ti l•n' S.ul:h putp•!Se, :tJl'ecit.'d peri;,,.m m,,)' 1i..~ h> t:IL',1m." th:tt a VL'tbati.m rl'O.".J 11C 1hr pr,11:L'CJilli,!S Lio' riuiJe whidt m..:urJ im:111,lim 111<" lt.~tim,,111t ~J r\'iJl!DI.,• ll(Jltlt '""hich.lht' .ippc:tl j,. t,• 1-c hai!--."d. 58 MIAMI DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW Publis~ed O&tly except Saturoay, Sunda, ano Lega1 Hol1cayf Uiami, Miemi-Dade Coun:y, Ftor1da STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE: Before lhe unders,gned authority personally appeared KESHA BASSUE, who on oath says that he or she is the LEGAL CLERK Legal Notices of the Miam, Daily B,ismess Review flk/a Miami Review, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami tn Miami-Dade County, Florida: that lhe attached copy of advertisement, being a Legal Advertisement of Not,ce in the matter of NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI -APR 3, 2018 in the XXXX Court, was published in said newspaper ,n the issues of 03123/2018 Affiant further says that the sa,d Miami Da,ly Business Review •s a newspaper published at Miam, m said Miami-Dade C0tmty, Flon::ta and that the said ne~spaper has heretofore been continuously published in said M,ami-Dade County, Florida eacl1 clay (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) alld has been eI1tered as second class mail matter at the post office in M,ami in sa,d Miami-Oacte County, Florida, for a periOd of one year next preced,ng the first pubhcation ol the attached copy o! advertisement, an:i afliant furtl1er says that he or sI1e has neither paid nor pron11sed any person, firm or corporalion any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose o! securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper Sworn to and subscribed before me \his 23 day of MARCH. AD. 2018 (SEAL)v KESHA BASSUE personally known lo me con CF SOUTH MOM.lllB ll\Q@'VDC!E OIF li'UBLBC HEARDN@ NOTICE IS HEREBY given that the City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida will conduct Public Hearing(s) at its regular City Commission meeting scheduled for Tuesday, April 3, 2018, beginning at 7:00 p.m.; in the City Commission Chambers, 6130 S~et Drive, to consider the following item(s): A Resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into a multi-year agreement for the purchase of a Use of Force simulator from Training LE, LLC !or the Police Department. ( A Resolution approving a $peciai Exception so as to allow -a project) within the TODD (MU-5) of more than four (4) stories and more than 40,000 square feet for the property located at 6075 SW 72nd Street. A Resolution relating to a variance application to reduce the amount of required parl{ing spaces for a mixed-use building located at 6075 SW 72nd Street. · An Ordinance amending the Official Zoning Map; amending the designation of the northern portion of the property located at 6075 SW 72nd Street. lrom "TODD (MU-4)" to "TODD(MU-5)". An Ordinance adopting an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to amend the future land use category "Parks and Open Spac;e" and to amend the Future Land Use Map ot the Comprehensive Pian, to identify the area located under the Metrorail, including ·the Underline linear park, as part of the City's Parks and Open Space, and Authorizing Transmittal to the Florida Department o1 Economic Opportunily and. Review Agencies. .ALL interested parties are invited to attend and will be heard. For lurther information, please contact the City Clerk's Office at: 305- 663-6340. Maria M. Menendez:, CMC City Clerk Pursuant to Florida Statutes 286.0105, the City hereby advises the public that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by this Board, Agency or Commission with respect to ·any matter considered at its meeting or hearing, he or she will need a record oi the proceedings, and that for such purpose, affected person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. 3/23 18-115/0000305989M 59 RESOLUTION NO. __ 0_7 _5 -_1_8_-_1_5_1_0_8 ___ _ A Resolution relating to a Variance application to reduce the amount of required parking spaces for a mixed-use building located at 6075 SW 72nd Street. WHEREAS, the applicant, Alta Developers, LLC, submitted an application (number PB-17- 034) requesting a variance of Section 20-4.4(8)(7) of the Land Development Code (LDC) for a reduction in required off-street parking spaces for a mixed-use building located at 6075 SW 72 nd Street; and WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted concurrent requests to change the zoning of the northern portion of the site from TODD (MU-4) to TODD (MU-5) and to gain Special Exception approval for a Large Scale Development pursuant to LDC Section 20-8.9; and WHEREAS, the proposed development will consist of 203 residential units, 2,441 square feet of commercial space, and 3,678 square feet of restaurant; and WHEREAS, the development program described above requires 466 parking spaces pursuant to the LDC and the applicant has proposed 314, including eleven on-street spaces; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 20-5.9 of the LDC, the approval of a variance requires a review by the Planning Board and a recommendation to approve, deny, or approve with conditions, as well as the approval of the City Commission after a public hearing; and WHEREAS, at its December 12, 2017 meeting, the Planning Board held a public hearing on the application, considered each of the variance criterion listed in Section 20-5.9 of the LDC, and voted four (4) to two (2) to recommend approval of the variance requested; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami, having considered each of the variance criterion listed in Section 20-5.9 of the LDC and having found that those conditions have been met, desire to approve the application for the variance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1: The recitals set forth in this resolution are true and they are supported by competent substantial evidence and they are incorporated into this resolution by reference as if set forth in full herein. Section 2. The application (number PB-17-034) submitted by Alta Developers, LLC, requesting to reduce the required off-street parking requirement from 466 spaces to 314 spaces, which is a reduction of 152 off-street parking spaces, for a mixed-use building consisting of 60 Pg. 2 of Res. No. 075-18-15108 commercial, restaurant and residential uses within the TOOD (MU-5) zoning district located at6075 SW 72 nd Street, South Miami, Florida, is hereby approved. Section 3. The approval of the requested variance includes, as an Exhibit to the Application, the architectural plans signed and sealed by Robert Behar, dated September 20, 2017 for the proposed mixed-use building located at 6075 SW 72 nd Street which is incorporated herein by reference. Section 4. Severability. If any section clause, sentence, or phrase of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, the holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this resolution. Section 5. Effective Date. This resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption by vote of the City Commission. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of, _A...,.p_r_i_l ___ __,. 2018. COMMISSION VOTE: 5-0 Mayor Stoddard: Yea Vice Mayor Harris: Yea Commissioner Gil: Yea Commissioner Liebman: Yea Commissioner Welsh: Yea 61 South~iami THE CITY OF PLEASANT LIVING CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM To: The Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Commission V1A: Steven J. Alexander, City Manager FROM: Jane K. Tompkins, AICP, Planning and Zoning Direct.7fJ.J DATE: March 20, 2018 SUBJECT: 10 An Ordinance amending the Official Zoning Map; amending the designation of the northern portion of the property located at 6075 SW n nd Street, from "TODD {MU-4)" to ''TODD (MU- S)". A Resolution approving a Special Exception so as to allow a project within the TODD (MU-5) of more than four (4) stories and more than 40,000 square feet for the property located at 6075 SW 72nd Street. A Resolution relating to a variance application to reduce the amount of required parking spaces for a mixed-use building located at 6075 SW 72nd Street. BACKGROUND: The property known as 6075 Sunset Drive is 1.6-acres in size and has frontages on SW 72 nd Street, SW 61st Avenue, and SW 71st Street; it makes up approximately one-half of the block. Currently, it's developed with a 20,371 sq. ft. multi-story office building and surface parking lot. The southeast corner of the lot is open space and there are several mature trees on the site. According to the City's Official Zoning Map, the property is zoned both TODD (MU-4) ''Transit- Oriented Development District. (Mixed-Use 4)" and TODD (MU-5) ''Transit-Oriented Development District. (Mixed-Use 5)", with the lot being split roughly in half north to south. The Future Land Use Map designation for the property is TODD (4+4 Story), which is consistent with both zoning districts. 62 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 2 of 13 PROJECT PROPOSAL Property Location Alta Developers, LLC, (the "applicant"), has submitted three (3) applications for the property: (1) a zoning map amendment for the northern portion of the property, changing it from TODD MU- 4 to TODD MU-5; (2) a special exception for a large-scale development of more than 40,000 square feet and four (4) stories; and {3) a variance to reduce the number of required parking spaces. The application package, which includes, among other things, the application, the letter of intent, a survey with legal description, renderings, a zoning chart, floor plans and roof plan (pages A-1.01 through A-1.07), elevations of the fourfa~ades (pages A-2.01 and A-2.02), a Tree Disposition Plan (sheet TD-1) and landscape plans (pages L-1 through L-4) is provided as an Attachment. If the applications are approved, the applicant will demolish the existing improvements and develop a multi-story, mixed-use (commercial/residential) building. Commercial space, consisting of 3,678 square feet of restaurant and 2,441 square feet of retail uses, will be located on the ground floor of the Sunset Drive fa~ade, and wrap around the corner of the building to also face onto SW 61 st Avenue. 11CT Z:\Comrr.,ss1on ltems\2018\04-03-2018\6075 Sunset\5075 Sur.set staff memo 04032018.docx 63 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 3 of l:l A total of 203 residential units will be located on the upper levels of the building and the ground floor level of the northern portion of the building. The unit mix consists of town homes, studios, and one-, two-, and three-bedroom units of varying sizes as follows: BREAKDOWN OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS Unit Type Number of Units Average Size Unit Mix(%} (SF) 1 Bedroom 102 738 50% 2 Bedrooms 72 1,077 35 3 Bedrooms 8 1,433 4 Studio 14 566 7 Townhomes 7 931 3 UNIT TOTAL 203 100 Six of the townhome units will be located on the ground floor adjacent to SW 71 st Street and the seventh adjacent 61 st Avenue. These units will be accessed from both the ground floor parking area and from the right-of-way. Tenant amenities including a dog park, pool deck, and common areas are provided on the upper levels of the building. A total of 303 on-site parking spaces will be provided to serve the building. Access to the parking garage is obtained via SW 71 st Street and parking makes up the second through fifth levels of the northern portion of the building. Ground-level parking and loading areas are accessed via 61 st Avenue. The building will be eight (8) stories in height along Sunset Drive and step down to fifty-two {52) feet along 71 st Street. APPLICATION REQUESTS The applicant has submitted three zoning applications: (1) a zoning map amendment from TODD {MU-4) to TODD {MU-5); (2) a Special Exception to allow a large-scale development of more than four stories and 40,000 square feet; and {3) a Variance to allow a reduction in the number of parking spaces. 1. Zoning Map Amendment TODD (MU-4) to TODD (MU-5) In order to develop the proposed mixed-use building, the northern portion of the property must be rezoned from TODD {MU-4) to TODD {MU-5). Excerpts of the existing and proposed zoning map are provided below: JKT Z:\Commission ltems\2018\04-03-2C18\6075 Su~set\6075 Sunset staff memo QG032018.docx 64 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 4 of 13 Proposed Zoning Map 1,J; _, 1/1 ___ ,... .. ,, 11W 7GSl . <1 Per the LDC, the TODD's purpose is to maximize the presence of the mass transit center that's within walking distance of the districts' boundaries. The district is made up of five (5) subcategories and it's intended to provide for the development of office uses, office services, office-related retail, retail, retail services, and residential uses in multi-story and mixed use projects that are characteristic of transit-oriented developments (Sec. 20-3.1(8)(16)). TODD MU-4 and TODD MU-5 are both described as "mixed use". The major difference between the two categories is in the allowable building height. MU-4 is limited to two stories. MU-5, on the other hand, requires a minimum of two stories with four stories allowed by right; up to eight stories are allowed if the building is designed in a way that makes it eligible for certain bonuses. These height bonuses are discussed in more detail in the discussion on the Special Exception request. There are also minor differences between MU-4 and MU-5 in the types of uses permitted: banks and saving institutions are allowed by-right in MU-5 and reupholstery and furniture repair is allowed as a special use in MU-5. Neither use is allowed in MU-4. Further, free- standing garages are allowed in MU-5, but not MU-4. As shown on the excerpt of the Zoning Map, above, the MU-4 district makes up essentially the northern half of the lots between SW 59 th Place and SW 61 st Court. This enclave of MU-4 is surrounded by MU-5, Medium Intensity Office (MO) and TODD (Pl). The mixed-use TODD and MO district are very similar in terms of land uses allowed, with the main differences being that MO doesn't allow the range of residential dwelling types or the retail uses found in the TODD. The table below provides the dimensional standards for the three districts: Comparison of Dimensional Requirements -- TODD (MU-4) TODD (MU-5) MO Minimum Size NA NA 10,000 sq. ft. Frontage NA NA 100' ---· ---- ,KT Z:\Comr,-iissio:i ltems\2018\04-03-2018\6075 Sunset\5075 Sunset staff memo 04032018.docx 65 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 5 of i3 Setback Front Vary based on Vary based on 15* Rear location location 10 Side (Interior) 0 Side (Street) 10 Between Buildings 20 Maximum Height 2 stories/28' 2 stories minimum/4 4 stories/SO' story maximum; up to 8 stories with bonuses per Sec. 20- 8.10 Building Coverage . NA NA NA- Impervious NA NA 85% Coverage FAR NA NA 1.6 As both MO and TODD (MU-5) allow for greater building heights and similar uses, the requested zoning change would not be incompatible. Staff has also reviewed the City's Comprehensive Plan and determined the requested rezoning furthers the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and, more specifically, the following goals and policies of the Future Land Use element: Jl(T Policy 1.1.2 In reviewing proposed amendments to this plan and the Zoning Map, compatibility with adjacent uses shall be the major determinant. Goal 3 To achieve a tax base adequate to support a high level of municipal services via increased mixed-use projects and flexible building heights in designated Transit Oriented Development Districts (TODD}, to the extent that development and redevelopment in these districts does not adversely impact surrounding neighborhoods and uses. Policy 3.1.1 Zone for new development and redevelopment in accordance with the Future Land Use Map, including mufti-story and mixed-used districts. Policy 3.1.4 The City of South Miami encourages development and redevelopment in the Transit-Oriented Development District. Existing streetscape widths along SW 62 Avenue and Sunset Drive will permit increased building heights that are aesthetically-pleasing. The City encourages transparent street-level retail with a mix of retail services, office uses, office services, and residential uses in mixed-use and multi-story projects, as well as encouraging a district-wide mix of land uses via multiple projects. Z:\Com.-,,ission items\2018\04-03-2018\6075 St.nset\6075 Sunset sta:: memo 04032018.docx 66 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 6 of 13 Finally, a concurrency analysis (see attachment) was completed to determine compliance with the various Level of Services standards. The standards will be satisfied by the proposed project. 2. Special Exception for a Large-Scale Development The applicant's second request is for approval of special exception for large-scale development. Pursuant to the TODD regulations (Sec. 20-8.9 Special Exceptions), any site larger than 40,000 square feet or any development taller than four (4) stories shall be designated as a Large-Scale _Development and reviewed under the Special Exception provisions of the Code. The proposed project exceeds both thresholds. Essentially, this section provides conditions and design requirements that a project must satisfy for approval; it is provided in its entirety as an Attachment. Staff Observations Based on Section 20-8.9 1. Residential uses are not permitted on the first floor within that portion of the building fronting on the main street. The phrase "main street" means the thoroughfare that abuts the property line of the development and which has the most traffic, as compared to any other street that abuts the property. The proposed project includes first floor residential on SW 61 st and SW 71 st . As these roadways do not have as much traffic as Sunset Drive, the project complies with this requirement. 2. The proposed uses are of a compatible and complementary nature with the existing and planned surrounding uses. The property is surrounded by buildings of various heights and land uses, including retail, office, a private club, a school and a mixed-use building. JKT Z:\Commission 1,ems\2018\04-C3-Z018\6075 Sunset\6075 Sunset staff memo 04032018.Cocx 67 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 7 of 13 Comparison with Surrounding Properties Land Use Zoning Property Office TODD MU-4 and TODD MU-5 North Office MO East Commercial TODD MU-4 and TODD MU-5 South City Hall and Miami-Dade TODD-Pl County Library West Multi-family residential, TODD MU-4, TODD MU-5 Office, and Private Club and MO 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity nor will it be detrimental to the public welfare, property or improvements in the neighborhood. 4. The MU-5 district allows four stories by right, and up to four more under Section 20-8.10 Bonus a/locations, as follows: Action Bonus For every one (1) floor of residential use One (1) additional floor of residential use with the minimum parking requirement (two (2) cars per residential use) Public plaza-min. five thousand (5,000) sq. ft. One (1) additional floor and art work in plaza setting Develop full frontage with street-design as One (1) additional floor part of pedestrian walkway system Develop "cross-thru's" from street to public One (1) additional floor open space system as part of pedestrian walk- system, on owner's property (maintenance required in Section 20-8.15) With three levels of residential, the project is entitled to an additional three floors. The full- frontage street design along Sunset Drive entitles the project to a fourth bonus floor, bringing the total project to a height of eight (8) stories. The fa~ade proposed for SW 71 st Street is only fifty-two (52) feet in height, which is comparable to the four stories/fifty (50) feet limit of the MO district across the street. JKT Z:\Conm1ssion :terr.s\20,8\04-03-2018\6075 Sucset\6::l75 Sunset staff me."":-'o 040320:8.cocx 68 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 8 of 13 5. The project must comply with other applicable Code provisions, including the TODD Regulating Plan. The Regulating Plan classifies streets in the district as either Main or Minor; and further provides design standards such as the location and dimensions of build-to lines and requirements for awnings or arcades based on these street types. The site plan for this property, which is challenged by having three (3) street frontages, was designed to comply with the regulations for a Main Street (i.e., Sunset Drive), which is treated as the front of the building. Further, the facades along SW 61st Avenue and SW 7pt Street, which are designated as Minor Streets, are treated as the side of the building. The building lacks the required awning or arcade on the north elevation but staff notes that the townhouse type residential units do not lend themselves to an awning or arcade, and that the landscaped areas in front of the units and the street trees will serve the same purpose as an arcade. Finally, Staff notes that the building at the east end of the block which also has frontage on three (3) streets, treats the71st Street fac;:ade as the rear of the structure and lacks an arcade or awning. Staff recommends that this be resolved with the Environmental Review and Preservation Board during their review. 6. The Traffic Impact Study and the Parking Study prepared by Richard Garcia & Associates, Inc., were reviewed on behalf of the City by Juan Calderon of CALTRAN Engineering Group, Inc. Mr. Calderon determined that the studies were acceptable (please see Attachments). 7. A Development Agreement and a Maintenance Covenant shall be prepared and approved by the Commission, in accordance with Section 20-8.9(1) and (J). 3. Variance to reduce the total number of parking spaces The final application is for a variance to reduce the required number of off-street parking spaces for the proposed development. As designed, the project has 303 spaces on-site and gets credit for eleven (11) spaces on the adjacent streets for a total of 314 spaces. With 203 residential units and 6,119 square feet of ground floor commercial/retail space, the project would be required to provide a total of 466 spaces: J!C" Residential: 2 spaces per unit plus 1 visitor space per 10 units (203 X 2) + (203/10) = 406 + 21 = 427 Retail: 1 space per 300 sq. ft. gross floor area 2,441/300 = 9 Restaurant: 1/100 sq. ft. of patron area plus 1/300 of non-patron area 2,452/100 = 25 1,226/300 = 5 TOTAL: 427 + 9 + 25 + 5 = 466 Z:\Comr11,ss1on iterns\20i8\04-03-2018\6075 Sunset\6075 Sunset staff memo 04032018.docx 69 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 9 of 13 With 466 spaces required and 314 provided, the project has a deficit of 152 spaces. The applicant proposes providing the required spaces for the retail and restaurant uses and the required visitor spaces, but reducing the residential parking to 1.3 spaces per unit for 275 residential spaces. Pursuant to Section 20-5.9 of the LDC, a variance for off-street parking can be reviewed and permitted by the City Commission at a public hearing, after a recommendation by the Planning Board. Variance decisions shall be based on an affirmative finding as to each of five criteria presented below along with Staff's findings. Please note that the Applicant's letter of intent includes their comments on how each of the criteria are satisfied. JKT 1. The variance is necessary to relieve particular extraordinary conditions relating to a specific property; Staff Response: The LDC requires properties in the TODD to have their parking located at the side or rear of the building, so street frontages can be developed with uses that maximize the pedestrian experience. Since this property has three street frontages all three have retail/restaurant and/or residential uses. Those liner uses result in the parking being limited to a smaller area of the ground level and the upper levels. With the four-story height limit of the MO district to the north, and to limit its bulk, the building is not designed to the full permitted height. These considerations result in even less space being available for parking and the inability to comply with the code requirements for parking. 2. Denial of the variance would result in hardship to the owner. Hardship results if the restriction of the zoning ordinance, when applied to a particular property, becomes arbitrary, confiscatory or unduly oppressive because of conditions of the property that distinguish it from other properties under similar zoning restrictions; Staff Response: One hundred sixteen units, or over half of the total, are either studio apartments or one-bedroom units. Imposing the code required parking of two (2) spaces per unit for these small units, seems unduly oppressive. 3. The extraordinary conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant; Staff Response: The condition of having three (3) adjacent streets is not the result of an action of the applicant. Z:\Cornmission !tems\2018\04-03-2018\6075 Sunset\5075 Sunset sta7' :-r-e-no 04032018.docx 70 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 ?age 10 of 13 4. The requested variance is the minimum variance necessary to make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure; Staff Response: Given the mix of unit sizes, the cost of the additional parking and the impact of the additional floors on the building's design, the variance requested is the minimum necessary to make possible the reasonable use of the land. 5. That the approval of the variance will be in consistent with the general intent and purpose of the Land Development Code, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Staff Response: Allowing a reduction in parking in the urban area close to the Metrorail, shopping and employment centers is consistent with the general intent and purpose of the LDC and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or detrimental to the public welfare. It is worth noting that it's common in development regulations to provide lower ratios for smaller units such as studios; and for transit oriented projects such as this one. Further, the Parking Study prepared by Richard Garcia & Associates demonstrates that the proposed parking will be sufficient for the needs of the development. PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION Following a public hearing on December 12, 2017, the Planning Board voted as follows to recommend approval of the applications, inclusive of staff's recommended conditions listed below, and the following additional conditions: (1) ensure that the Landscape Plan comply with the mitigation requirements of the LDC; and (2) the applicant to consider a minimum of four (4) units of affordable housing via a covenant. J1(T 1) Zoning Map Amendment from TODD (MU-4) to TODD (MU-5): Vote: six ayes, two nays (2) Special Exception to allow a project of more than four (4) stories and more than 40,000 square feet in size: Vote: six ayes, two nays (3) Variance to reduce the amount of required parking: Vote: six ayes, two nays Z:\Commission l!e,-,,s\2018\04-03-2018\6075 Sunset\6075 Sunset staff memc 04032018.docx 71 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment Aprii 3, 2018 Page 11 of 13 STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND CONOITlo'NS OF APPROVAL Staff recommends approval, with the conditions listed below, of the proposed changes: (1) an amendment to the Official Zoning Map changing the designation from TODD MU-4 to TODD MU- S for the northern portion of the property; (2) a Special Exception to allow a large-scale development; and (3) a Variance to reduce the required number of parking spaces. General Conditions 1. -Any development of the property will be in substantial compliance with the documents submitted including: Letter of Intent from Ines Marrero-Priegues dated August 11, 2017; Application Book consisting of a survey prepared by Fortun, Leavy, Skiles, Inc. dated 7 /27 /17; Renderings dated 9/20/17 (Sheets R-1.0 through R-1.2), Site Photographs {Sheets CP-1.0 and CP- 2.0); a Zoning Chart dated 8/11/17 (Sheet A-0.1) a site plan data sheet (A-1.00); Floor and Roof Plans (Sheets A-1.00 through 1.07); building elevations (Sheets A-2.01 and A-2.02); a building section drawing (Sheet A-3.01); and Planter Details (Sheet A-4.0) all signed and sealed by Roberto Behar {9-20-17); and a Tree Disposition Plan dated 10/10/17 (Sheet TD-1) and landscape plans (Sheets L-1 through L-4) dated 8/8/17 prepared by Witkin Hults Design Group; and a Traffic Impact Study and Parking Study both prepared by Richard Garcia & Associates. 2. All documents submitted with this application are to be made part of the record. 3. Any improvements in the Public Right-of-Way shall be approved by the applicable agency (FOOT, Miami-Dade County and/or City of South Miami). 4. All impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permit. 5. The Applicant shall provide a letter acknowledging compliance with the applicable Level of Services requirements prior to the issuance of final permit to the property. If any concurrency approvals expire a re-review shall be required by the appropriate agency. 6. Any changes that increase densities, intensities or population shall require a new Concurrency Analysis. 7. Applicant shall submit verification from Miami-Dade County that the proposed new development has been reviewed and approved for all access management considerations prior to site plan approval. 8. Flood elevations shall be reviewed and approved for consistency with FEMA requirements and the City's National Insurance Flood Program Ordinance prior to building permit approval. JKT Z:\Com,n,ssion ltems\2018\04-03-2018\6075 S~rset\6075 Su~set staff T.emo 04032018.docx 72 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 12 of 13 9. The Applicant shall comply with applicable conditions and requirements by Miami-Dade County Public Works Department, Fire Rescue Department, Department of Regulatory and Economics Resources -DERM (DRER), Miami-Dade County Water and Sewer Department, and FOOT. 10. The Applicant shall execute and record in the public records of Miami-Dade County, a Development Agreement and a Maintenance Covenant, in a form approved by the City Commission and City Attorney, which complies with the requirements of Land Development Code Section 20-8.9. 11. The Applicant shall execute and record in the public records of Miami-Dade County, a restrictive covenant, in a form approved by and subject to the review and approval of the City Manager and City Attorney, which contains all commitments made and conditions imposed as part of the approval of the Applications. Construction General Conditions 12. A Construction and Maintenance of Traffic {MOT) Plan shall be provided by the Applicant to the Public Works Departments for approval prior to start of construction. Access points by construction vehicles shall be provided within the MOT. 13. The Applicant shall provide a Construction Air Quality Management Plan to the Department prior to the start of construction. 14. A Construction, Demolition and Materials Management Plan (CDMMP) must be submitted by the Applicant at time of building permit. 15. Construction shall only take place Monday through Friday during the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. landscaping 16. The Applicant shall meet all of the minimum requirements of the City Code, Chapters 18 and 24 of the Miami-Dade County Code and specifically comply with all conditions imposed by Miami-Dade County Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources - DERM (DRER), if any. 17. The property shall be landscaped in accordance with the landscape plan, included with the site plan submittal, and approved by the Environmental Review and Preservation Board. 18. Pursuant to Sec. 20-4.5, as may be amended, the Applicant shall provide mitigation for all trees to be removed in accordance with City requirements. JC Z:\Corn-nission !te:-r.s\2018\04-C3-2C18\6:J75 Sunset\607S Sunse: stafi memo 04032018.::ocx 73 Alta Developers LLC/6075 Sunset Zoning Map Amendment April 3, 2018 Page 13 of 13 Environmental 19. The Applicant shall meet the requirements of the Miami-Dade County Water-Use Efficiency Standards Manual, effective· January 2009, as may be amended from time to time. 20. All storm water drainage systems shall be maintained in working order at all times to avoid localize flooding-during and after a storm. Parking shall be prohibited on top of any drainage inlet or drainage manhole. Architecture 21. Final approval of all plans must be obtained from the Environmental Review and Preservation Board, as required by Code. ATTACHMENTS: * Application Package * Application * Letter of intent * Application booklet * Concurrency Analysis * Land Development Code Section 20-8.9 Special Exceptions * Traffic Impact Study prepared by Richard Garcia & Associates, Inc. * Parking Study prepared by Richard Garcia & Associates, Inc. * Email from Juan Calderon of CAL TRAN Engineering Group, Inc. * Draft Ordinance approving the Zoning Map amendment * Copy of Applicant's Notification Letter and Affidavit of Mailing * Notice of Public Hearing * Legal Ad * Mailing Label Affidavit with Location Map (Property Owners within 500 Feet) dated 8/8/18 * Mailing Label Affidavit with Location Map (Abutting Property Owners) dated 8/8/17 * Excerpt of Planning Board meeting minutes, December 12, 2017 J!(T Z:\Comm,ssion ltems\2018\04-03-2018\607:i 5unset\6C75 Sunset staF r.1emo Q40320i8.dacx 74 22SE I NEJGHBORS I SUNDAY MAR(H ll 1018 MIAMIHERAl D.COM P-e1,odelerl r,1iami Beach oceanfront r:onl'.'!(;_ rntracoa'.ital VieW!t, 2/2, $419.000 Downtown Mi;;,ni, c!i,ect knoc,out bny & ocean views lbd/lba, 802 ,F, $399,000 Public Meeting Notice East-West Corridor Rapid Transit Project SR 83hr Dolphtn [xpr~S<;\',;:J', from M1,1m1 fn•ermod.::il Cc11ter \ \i!Cl :ii ~1r;-im1 Intern tmn;i! 4uport 1MIA) lo SR 90 1US 4:1 5W 3t.i StrPel ;:,t SW 109111 1\\CJlllC; Florida fntcrnatlon,i! Unlvcrs!ty {F!U) The Department of Transportation And Public Works (DTPW) hi!S .-;<:l1edLlerJ lwo Corridor Wnrkshops for •.his project. The study consis:s or evaluating rapin tr~nsit alternatives. It \\ill also include trans•t stations/st.ops and parl1-and-rid&/tra11sit terminal facilities. The meetings wHJ be held from 6 p.rn. to 8 p.m. on: Tuesday. Aprll 10,.2018 St. Dominic Cathollc Church 5909 NW 7"' Street Mlam~ FL33126 and Thursday, April 12, 2018 FIU Modesto A. Maldlque campus Wertheim ConseMllOry (WC) 130 11200 SW S'"Street Mlnrnl, FL 33199 MIAMl·DADEJI mE ;. nt.r-fl"tit::-.~;:·1:i<>·• Jt! ti•~, 1•·~~,1•1i-; i~ ,,,·:,r.ir~I v:ilhm,: r:.p;,rt1 :,; rlVV-. ('(II'~.--n"il~flo:11 •lll!i-"'· l'ti::'t~. ~;;rirtttr. 'C-l'f!Hit\ ,,r.wo,i.'1· -,, ,.,111•1~ "i.t;.11,, .. r·,r-:,,;,:,; tr: l"r. ptt,i..,·,;;~,t1._ 11! ti•~ Amr.r•,.·r,•:<;l u,lh i)i•,:1;1•••1!1'-'> ,1 ,I, ."1.1~ (!••r..:0,1 ,·t:1111:,.;n{! ._, •• _ ... _ 1,, .>C't;?t:tt1•1;1,•i,Jf''.J'I: '•J ~-,r;;,r,.;•t; "I tit•,; ,::,!,'fc •11et-•f•1g I" .l'i~~•,;t I(• uo.,.,~ •. 1•1,1 ~µc.1c:r n~ fttto •• 1 ,' d,,!'~ t,ct,.,,,, :111· I" !-.'tt' .,.,..,.f:r.J,' :,, /"Ol~:.;..,:t,'•:i< r.lt.tltJ1 ;>,1.>;,"tt,, ,"('(5}-lf,9,;)]Jt: for 1r -.,,i,1111,•llll'IV /lil \iW l''(.r,:.r. !f 1 l('('t .• \f1-lm,. 't ·;::.:, Jt,, c,r,;;M \•lt,r:•'.•<;,tl,.,;•F•f:-lrr"Drr:1,,1nr!,.•.fr,'t. II "'':J ,,.,..,~ ~ 'lf)t':'f'Cn ir.11"-"'r.°lM•••~• rr ;;~ 111,tf rt 1U1~1,.•~A IJ•PftCf' rt)l't., .... •hr. l11V!'1t:l' . .,~j,, .. :he l'lnr.-1i) R,:-1,lr c;,._.,._,,. ... U801)J 9:,•j fN'J. {TC.-J,i, r .!f,9Qt>; ;,:;-;..,-;m '.;,,1,c,:;. 1,1 · MMiamiSMJI.RTplan SMARTEastWest@rrlamfdade.gov &www.miamfSMARTplc1n.com De1·3~hed duplex, feels like ~ingle fam home. 2bd/2ba, 150(h SF. $3100/n•o. Updated lownhorne in gat>!d tornrnunily. 2bdi2 Sba, l.400• SF, $2400/'Tlo. CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI COURTESY NOTIC:E ~,n l("J•: I~ an,:,umY d\·.:11 1luo th~· Ctt, <:1m11ni'i,1:m ,,r 1h,· c..:,,,. ,,r S,11nh .'·lii1111i. Fh1n1fo ",i: ,·rn11.lul1 Puhla· I 1, ttnll~'''' ,1I iii-n·~ul.•r ( ·11, O·mm\'i,.l•'ll r,i,•rlm1,! ~·J1t•dull•J Jur Tu~•:.i.lay. i\pnl ~-:WI:,,:. lt1·t:n11111,l! ,11 7 1)•1 p 111 ,n thr C11~· (.\1mmi,,wn Ch:unh\•r~. f,J :l,r) Sun,~• Lln,·,•, 1,, "OQ!t.t,l,•r :t:i: t'1•!111wmy: ih·•:11,1 ,\ K,.,,:J11Ut'!1 :111U1,,r11•11,~ d'h• C11, M,111.if•'l h· •'111':r 111111 ,1 nmli:-~\'iiU :1'.!.L:·•:uwn1 h>I lb-: 1••:Rba .. ,· .. 1 ,, • ~•: ,,I I ,,i~·•· ,11.•1.:l.111•1 •10•1111J111u,~ 1.L. 1.1 C' , .. r 11 ... • r.,i.~,. u~pJ11111,•n1 ,\ ~\ "'l•,11,•1, ,1,,?r•·,111•: ,t ~JJt!~i:tl h~1:!!rf:u11 ... , ;1, 1,~ ;1llu\\ ,I l'l'""''' \1 nbm 11,.-Tl '1)111.\ll",·~1,,t 1fl,th' 1h,1r. l•'III 1J I •t..:i..•i-:11•11111,>1~· 1h:u, J11,,,.,11 ''l'1i11 .. • 1, ..... , 1,,1 111,, 1•r••1,-:1h h,:at..••I ;u hil':'" S\\• r:! S1r.:~·1 ( .\ R, .. , •. )1111 .. 11 :,•J,11;"1/ I••:, Hlflillh.•' :1rrh,,ll11•11 I•• i.•Jn .. • Uw -1111-111:11 ••I r:•111111,•,I r:.d;tn~'. -r·1._1!', h•r ,I 1111~.••l•ll•·• h.1,l,IUl!t i,,1::11,•J ,,t (, :;:; '.--W 71'-' ~ll\0t'I ,,,. r,..,li11,11h" :111:r111l111~ 1l1o.• 01)1,r,1! Z•·mni: ►1:1r ;1m,•1,,l111~ 1tw 1k•nt11,,11 .. n 1•1 llw 11"111\l·lll l'"'''"li ,,1 rho: ('f•'t"-'11' 1, .. :11,•t1;111'\17i!\\\ ~:,, $1:.·,::.lr••111'TllUll•!lw-1\ ..J,•'1i, lY1l•T11M1 1 <;1". .!\1, Or1lm:1111.:,· ,1;!,,111:11:,0 "" ·•1111.•1111111,•u; '" lh,· i 01••11rrd1o•n,w,· i'tl:111 I\• :11110.'l1>1 llt,· 1111111•.' l,111,! ,...,. ,,,h•~•'I • ·ra,,, ;111,! 1 ''"'11 Srw'l•· :11111 1,. ,1w,·1,i! Ill\' f•1,1m,· ! .. mil 1 ·~,· f,t1r .. , th.: f.',•111rtt'fll:i,n·,· P!a11 ti• 1tlL•111,r, 1h,· m·:i l11,·;1r,,1 u1•,J~•r lh-\1,:,t~r.-:111. ITI\!11,hm• !ht· L'11,lr1'li1W' lll\r:1r r.1rl.. :1• r:1f1 ,,f 1111~ 1·,:,·, l'.1rks1 ..... 1 r'.:J'lc"II :-:ir.1t·•·. :m,1 ;\11l!1,1111.1•1:· 11.1u"1,111:,11,, 1ir,· i-1 ,11o1:, r>.•r.1111ti-.•111,-1 E" ,11-11111,·01•r.-rtu1111,· :111d t.rt",,L"'' A:.01•111:i.•, -\1.L in1i:·1\~:-1o•1I 11;111k-. arr 1m·ih~I M mi,·n,1 :tll\l \\JU h '"'111J b~r 1•.:11h,·, 1uh,r111.,t11111. plt:1!-,' t'\:111:,,·1 th,• C:il~ t'k1J.-.", r:1111\·1~ ill 'll°'-ttr:~-M-Ut M:1rh1 ;\1. ~kllt:nl!,·r.. t.:~11 · Ct1yCl<.-1J. £1ur-.11;1'11 1 .. l·i••,•d.1 'il·•lut,•• .'l-tdlll1". lit!: ('11~ :n·l"h~ :uhho•, th,· ~ut.h, lh:11 •I it 1".'l'··n ,ti•,·1;k.: !1• .tJ'J"!'!d ,,11• •h-l'l'-h"I 111,111•· In Ii.,, 11,,·u,J. ,\r,:m, ,,, f.',,m:111-. .. 11>11 "111, n.·•r·•\' ••• •111} 111am•1 ,.,,u,1ofo•?.•d ..t! 11, 111i:d111j• ,•: h,:,1:m>!. ,t,• ·"•'•~·•\Ill 1,, ...... , ll"•••r,1 ••I.,, .. 1'J••1,1, ,hlu.'• :111,l lh,11 •••l ,ud1 p111r••\t'. anh.-,L .. , l~lll"I! 111:1~ ll•'•·d .. , 1.'l\'-:lt .. lh:,1 ,I ,.,.,h.n1111 ll'\;,•h! ,,) :It.· 1·1••• ,,:-i111~•, 1° 111,1.l • ••·b1,h 1,•,,-1,l in, lud,-:.., 1)1,.~ 1,:~1,111"11", .111,l 1•• 1,!,.•11,,· u1h•II ••l11ch lb•: J):J•t•·1I 1 .. 1,, h:• h,1-..•,I 75 ST.i>.TE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE; i.lnders,g'lc-.:: a~t!i.::n~'l per!--:.·:iai,y arp-E:-ared whc or. oa:h ::iays tha~ J;e r:.,:-$ne ,$-l! 1~ LEc-.::.L CLEi:;;k L.:;9a: l\1011.::e-!: •:Jr 1;1c ~-~,a·:1• C'e1i,· c:,s-,ne~~ PE\:1c11,: flta Mrarn, Re\.·1ei1-,. a cta1ly (.t::>~cep1. Sa~~11 ,j8 )_. S:..n:ia)' a 11c Lega' Hc,!:oa~•s. newsoape-1 P~.m:iS:!,e:c a~ !\~a.am.. I!~ r,t.iam,-Ciace C.o:.mf>' Florida. that u1e a:tacho:d _ ct•PY Df ad,1(":':i,:-em1:nt b<:!ng a Leg,cl A:;h,ert,semen: ot No!•ce-:·J thi::- l'1i.)l 1Cf. ~F' PLtE,UC HE.;..J~ff..:G C,;'\' C'-~ S•)UTH f\lifl..M! ~,:..PF.~-?OIS "·' l~e ·,:x '< \ Court •,•,·as pubt,sric-ci :11 ~aio newspc.!r-•e-r 1r. the iS.!,ues c.1! ::.trit:n; iwtl1C:1 sa.,s tl-:a: ~:·,,r. ~a•d M;ar-1: [:::,:~-El:!,!•1e~~- R,:v.-:-~'1,· is a ...,Eh·\•~j;•,~;:,,e-• r.·l"r,l,~J,~c· c., !ba:11:. ., sa,::-: l\•'.i,i:-t·11-0,3-..l-: (:c,~m~)-C"Jc-•1{:1~ ;;-n::: 11,~1 t:~r: ~h•t) 'ie\'-'~-r,a;, .. .,;r !·:a: l1e~ctu!c;-e ueer CO!il'!'l/!(11,,1!.J;• c-ufJ,•sllt?ci ,,.1 said \trn'll•~laoe.- 1.:c,.r:1)' rivr:da ea:;:: d~·: 'E:) cei't ~-a~\:roar s ... n:ir:f w,~ !..epa! 1-io;,::;ay.:-i ana =~2s 1,l:i:-.:;r. E-:1~erec~ i,;S st••~cnr: ~•"2!_:S :na.1 n·,~tte-· a1 ~r:c.-poft nt'1rP. in l.lii?.111: ·'i s~•~1 1 ... ~iar--·1:-Dac-=-Cc-tllih· :::;,~;,:,,,:.~•• ,/ u-,:-=•~~~~c~'.:,j ,,.,. y<?a, ne,: ;.,•.-:e-:k; l"'E f;r~! f.mr.er sa!'?: U;at ~,c-G'." ~-i·:t• -~!:l;Y ":~i,,:;\c_-~--~-'-.•,:t·,",;-_~, ··: a:-:.:: ~,fiicn! . p:c~~1~a:: r::r-1· ~,er$.')!i km o:· c::·q·:a~1!at1~ .. n ai'f d1s:..:r.L:nt !"ei:,au=·. i-::c.~~i•i%-:sic,:1 a::,·· refL.no for the purpose of ~e-::~ir•:lg !t"'·s, BC:ve-!t!~':-fiiC-!~: !:.;,, p-..:bl,cat,0•1 rli trie sa1C r,e ... .-spap-~ r 1~\w·,rn 1i:'-;:H"!-'.:! St 1!.'1St"r1!)ec! bFfOtf: rn<:-t'la: 23 ciay of MARCI-:.;:.. D. 2:na c-1-:u .~ t··u,,,:,-r; __ .... '$E-'-.~i '.: r,ESH.:. B . .:a.SSUE D&1~c.r1a:1y ~nr-,wr, t~ rne ~ .,ov-,. D ;.. V ~ 1.~._.,:a,;,r;s,R,\tl IJ ,t. .. 192:7 . ~ 0~.{\ \"• \ ~-~- ©Oil~f @IF $@1Wii'li'fi Lt'i!G&~&ilC f:tl@>'i!O~@ @Ir ifllW@f~D© fr,i~ti\ffi!.!!fi\',@ 1-!0TiC;: IS l·!l::REBY given that the City Commission of the C1ty of South iJiiami. Florida will conduct Public Hearing(s) at its regular City Commission meeting scheduled tor Tuesday, April 3, 2018, beginning at 7:00 p.m., in U1e Cit\' Commission Chambers, 6130 Sunset Drive. to consider the following ,te,11(.s): . A Resolution aull1orizing the City Manager to enler into a multi-year r,greement for the purchase of a Use of Force simulator from Training LE, LLC for the Police Departmer,t. A Resolution approv1ny a Special EM;eption so as lo ailow a projeci within the TODD (MU-5) ot more than four (4) slo1ies and more than 40,000 square feet for the property located at 6075 SW 72nd Street. ( .A. Resolution relating to a variance application lo r~duce the amount of ) required pati<ing spaces lo,· a mixed-use building located at 6075 SW 72nd Street. . lln Ordinance amending the Official Zoning Map; arnending the designation of \he northern portion of the property located at 6075 SW 72nd Street, irom "TODD {MU-4)" to "TODD (MU-5)''. An Ordinence adopting an arner.dment to the Comprehensive Plan .-o amend the luture land use category "Parks and Open Space" and 1o amend the Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan. to identify the area located under the l'!letrorail, including the Underline linear park. as part of the City's Parks and Open Space, and Authorizing T ransmIttal to the Florida Department of Ec;onomic Opportunity and Roview Agencies. ALL interested parties ate invited to attend end will be heard. For further informaiion, please contact the City Clerk's Office at: 305- 663-6340. Maria M. Menendez, CMG City Clerk Pursuanl to Florida Sta\utes 286.0105. the City hereby advises the public that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by this Board. Agency or Commission with respect to any matter considered at ,ts meeting or hearing. Ile 01 she will need a record of the proceedings, and 1I1at for such ptu-pos.,, affecteo person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the procee<ii119s is made w'lk-'1 record includes the testimony and e"idenc.e upor. ,Nh1ch.,he cpp.sr.! 1s to be bm=.ed 3•23 l[\-115/00003059fl,l(,A 76 City of South Miami P lanning & Zo n ing D epa rtment THE CITY OF PLEASANT LIVING City Hall, 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida 33143 Telephone : (305) 663-6326 A pplica ti o n fo r Public Hearinf! before Planrrin~ Board & C itv Commission Address of Subject Property: 6075 Sunset Drive Lot(s) __ Block --Subdivision PB 13 -62 --Please See Exhibit "A" -Legal Description Applicant: Maestra Sunset, LLC Phone: (305) 789-7776 Represent at ive: Ines Marrero-Priegues , Esq. Organization : Holland & Knight, LLP James R. Williams Jr., Esq . Address: 701 Brickell Avenue, Suite 3300 Phone: (305) 789-7776 Miam i, FL 33131 (305) 789-7413 . _ , /),n - Property Owner: Sunset-Miami Investments, Inc. ~~(.Signature: ~~-,.~ 1 ~.i#-1 ,.. , ..,ii" ....... --,,r-· Mailing Address: 1313 Ponce De Leon Blvd., #200 Phone: (305) 789-7776 Coral Gables, FL 33134 ~rchitect/Engineer: Phone: (305) 273-9911 MSA Architects AS THE APPLICANT, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO THIS PROJECT: ...x._Owner _ Owner's Representative _ Contract to purchase _ Option to purchase _Tenant/Lessee APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE FOR THE FOLLOWING: SUBMITTED MATERIALS PLEASE CHECK THE APPROPRIATE ITEM : PLEASE CHECK ALL THAT APPLY: -Text Amendment to LDC _Variance ..lL Letter of intent ..lL Zoning Map Amendment _Special Use JL Justifications for change _ PUD Approval _Special Exception _ Statement of hardship _ PUD Major Change _Abandonment of ROW .x.. Proof of ownership or letter from owner _Other (Waiver of Plat) ..2L Power of attorney Briefly explain application and cite specific Code sections: _ Contract to purchase ..lL Current survey (1 original sealed and Pl eas e see the Letter of Intent. Request to rezone the proo ertv from Transi t-O rien ted signed/1 reduced copy @ 11" x 17") Development District Mixed Use 5 ("TODD (MU-5)") to the Transit-Oriented .x.. 15 copies of Site Plan and Floor Plans Development District Mixed Use 6 ("TODD (MU-6)"). 24 x 36", 1 reduced copy@ 11" x 17" .x.. Affidavit-Receipts attesting to mail notices sent Section : --Subsection: __ Page#: __ Amended Date : ..lL Petition ..lL Mailing labels (3 sets) and map ..lL Required Fee(s) The undersigned has read this comp leted app li cation and represents that the information and all submitted materials are true and correct to the best of the ap , ' knowle dge and belief. ~g~rc: . . :TaM,1.$ e. lJ,1li4"1S sr. (V.at 3dlP2~ ppUca nt's Signature and ti e Print Name Date Upo n recei pt app li cation s and all subm itted mater ials wi ll be reviewe d for comp.lian ce wi t h the Land Deve lopm ent Code and other app li cable regulations . App li cat ions found not in eomp liance w i ll be rejected and returned to the app licant. OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Filed ____ _ Date of PB Hearing, _____ Date of Commission. ____ _ Petition Required __ _ Petition Accept ed. _____ _ Method of Pa ment Z:\Forms\Current Planning Department Forms \Planning Department Forms\Planning Board\PB -Public Hearing Application - Revised 3-10-2020.doc 77 Holland & Knight 701 Brickell Avenue, Suite 3300 I Miami , FL 33131 IT 305.789.7744 I F 305.679 .6422 Holland & Knight LLP I www.hklaw.com VIA HAND DELIVERY Mr. Alex David City Consultant City of South Miami 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, Florida 33143 July 5, 2022 James R. Williams Jr. (305) 789-7413 James.Williams@hklaw.com Re: Sunset-Miami Investments, Inc./ Maestra Sunset, LLC / 6075 Sunset Drive Amended and Restated Letter of Intent for Rezone Application (the "Application") Dear Mr. David: The undersigned represents both the Applicant, Maestra Sunset, LLC (the "Applicant"), and Sunset-Miami Investments, Inc. (the "Owner"), the owner of the property consisting of± 1.61 acres of land located at 6075 Sunset Drive in South Miami, Florida (the "City") and identified by folio number 09-4025-011-0010 (the "Property"; legally described in Exhibit "A") in connection with a request to rezone the Property from Transit-Oriented Development District (Mixed Use-5) ("TODD (MU-5)") to Transit-Oriented Development District (Mixed Use-6) ("TODD (MU-6)"). This request is accompanied by a request for a special exception approval for the proposed large scale development ofa mixed used commercial/residential project of more than four stories and in excess of 40,000 square feet pursuant to Section 20-8.9 of the City Land Development Regulations. An aerial of the Property is included below for your reference and convenience. 78 Below is a tabular summary of the property, acreage, existing and proposed rezone designation. Only one (1) parcel is subject to this request and the application seeks the re-designation of this one (1) property in its entirety. Property Address Acreage Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning Designation Designation 6075 Sunset Drive ± 1.74 Acres TODD (MU-5) TODD (MU-6) The Applicant respectfully submits this application to rezone the Property from TODD (MU-5) to TODD (MU-6) to allow for the future development of a 10 story mixed use retail/residential project. The Property is currently vacant and has been cleared. The uses pennitted in TODD (MU-6) are similar to those pennitted in TODD (MU-5), however, the reason for the rezoning request to TODD (MU-6) is to permit a 10 story retail/residential mixed use development. TODD (MU-5), as the Property is currently zoned, only pennits a maximum height of 8 stories (utilizing bonuses), including other limiting factors. Rezoning the Property to TODD (MU-6) would permit the Property to accommodate not only more residents during a time that supply is desperately needed all throughout the City and County, but also by providing affordable housing opportunities to those struggling to find homes in this low supply/high priced housing market. As supported by the Applicant's companion request, the Property is ideally situated for the proposed mixed use retail/residential project. Furthermore, this request is consistent with land use patterns within the City's Comprehensive Plan and FLUM. Specifically, the following Goals and Policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan will be furthered by this rezoning: FLU Goal 3 Transit-Oriented Development District (TODD): Provide for increased intensity of mixed-use projects and flexible building heights in designated Transit-Oriented Development Districts (TODD), to the extent that development and redevelopment in these districts does not adversely impact surrounding primarily residential neighborhoods and uses. FLU Objective 3.1: Support higher densities and intensities in the TODD areas to take advantage of the proximity of the Metrorail and create an area where residents can live and work in a pedestrian-oriented environment. Policy 3.1.2. The City shall maintain and, as appropriate, expand the Transit-Oriented Development Districts delineated on the Future Land Use Plan Map. Development and redevelopment in these districts shall occur in accordance with adopted development and redevelopment plans and the #157300855 Vl 2 79 land development regulations, and shall not adversely impact surrounding neighborhoods and uses. FLU Goal 6: To support the economic viability of the City through an adequate tax base and development that allows for the efficient provision of City services. FLU Objective 6.1: Continue to increase the City's tax base and fiscal health through new development and redevelopment, increased property values, annexations, impactfees, grants, and other strategies as appropriate. Policy 6.1.1 Zone for new development and redevelopment in accordance with the Future Land Use Map, including multi-story and mixed-use districts. Housing Goal 1: To assure the availability of desirable, sound, and affordable housing for all current and future residents of the City of South Miami with special focus on infill and redevelopment and to include additional housing units in the Hometown District. It is recognized that the choice of residence location and housing type rests with the individual and that the City's role is to implement policies that expand locational and cost choices. Housing Objective 1.1: The City shall support public and private efforts to provide at least 100 additional housing units, and aspire for the creation of more units, by 2023. Additionally, the City shall seek to provide an adequate supply of housing units that are affordable to households of all incomes, including the middle income sector, in proportions that are reflective of the City 's housing demands and needs in residential projects and communities. The rezoning request will allow the development of a modern, energy efficient and non- car centric, mixed use retail/residential project that will support the City's tax base and will not adversely impact the surrounding residential neighborhood. The Property is located along SW 72 Street ("Sunset Drive"), a major artery through the City and approximately one (1) block west of South Dixie Highway. The Property is within a quarter mile of several other properties primarily consisting of TODD zoned properties, several zoned TODD (MU-5) and TODD (MU-6). The increased height available under the TODD (MU-6) zoning designation will optimize the unique location benefits of the Property. It will allow future residents to use multimodal transportation , ride sharing services, or be within walking distance of the nearby retail shops, offices, South Miami Hospital facilities , and South Miami Metrorail station, which is located approximately one (1) block to the east of the Property. It should also be highlighted that the Property abuts a bus stop pick up/drop off area along SW 72 Street. Although neither the City's Comprehensive Plan nor the City's Land Development Code designate a specific distance requirement for TODD categories, other government entities such as Miami-Dade County designate a half a mile radius as an appropriate distance for the location of TODD categories in relation to Metrorail stations. For example, Section 33-193.6 of the Miami- Dade County Zoning Code states that a "transit corridor area is the area which lies within a one- half mile radius of (i) the Metrorail stations, (ii) the corridors identified in the Strategic Miami Area Rapid Transit (SMART) Plan, or (iii) corridors designated by the Board of County #157300855 VJ 3 80 Commissioners ... " (emphasis added). As stated, the Property is located less than half a mile from the South Miami Metrorail station and would thus meet the distance requirement of other transit- oriented zoning categories in Miami-Dade County. Therefore, the proposed re-designation to TODD (MU-6) will continue the development trend along South Dixie Highway and SW 72 Street, while also providing adequate access to existing services and amenities in the adjacent area to accommodate the needs of potential residents. The close proximity could serve as a housing opportunity for professionals working in the surrounding area, including those working at South Miami Hospital just down the street. Additionally, under the proposed re-designation to TODD (MU-6), the Property could be developed with a minimum of 50 dwelling units per net acre and a maximum building height of eight (8) stories, by right, or up to twelve (12) through the use of bonuses. Specifically, the Applicant is proposing to develop the Property with 316 dwelling units, 3,825 square feet of ground floor retail space, and a public square/plaza of more than 7,500 square feet of contiguous area, functionally and visually connected to the pedestrian walkway system and designed to include amenities such as benches, shade trees, and additional amenities. The building is proposed to stand at a height of IO stories. The Applicant is requesting an additional 2 stories of residential units through the use of bonuses available under the TODD (MU-6) District. One (1) additional bonus story will be obtained by providing a secure bike parking room that will also consist of loaner bicycles available for use by building residents and employees, a bike repair station, and locker/changing room for the building residents and employees to enjoy, pursuant to Section 20- 8.1 0(B). The other additional bonus story will be obtained for providing a public square and plaza of at least seven thousand five hundred (7,500) square feet of contiguous area, functionally and visually connected to the pedestrian walkway system and designed to incorporate benches, shade (trees and structures), play and/or exercise areas, and water stations, pursuant to Section 20- 8.1 0(B). The proposed mixed use retail/residential project will also provide much-needed housing for current and future residents of the City, including affordable housing units as required in Section 20-8.4(D) of the Land Development Code. Based on the foregoing, we respectfully request your favorable review and recommendation of approval of this request. Thank you in advance for your considerate attention to this matter. Please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP Ines Marrero-Priegues Cc: James R. Williams Jr., Esq . #157300855 VI 4 81 Exhibit "A" Property Legal Description ALL OF TRACT A, LESS THE EAST 118 FEET OF THE NORTH 129.07 FEET, IN BLOCK 1, AND LOT 3, IN BLOCK I, OF "ROSSWOOD", ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, AT PAGE 62 IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI- DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE SOUTH 25 FEET OF SAID BLOCK I. #157300855 Vl 5 82 City of South Miami P lanning & Zo ning D epartment THE CITY OF PLEASANT LIVING City Hall, 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami , Florida 33143 Telephone: (305) 663-6326 A pplicati on fo r Public Hearin ~ befo r e P lannin~ Board & City Commission Address of Subject Property : 6075 Sunset Drive Lot(s) __ Block __ Subdivision _____ _ Please See Exhibit "A" -Legal Description Applicant: Maestra Sunset, LLC Representati ve : Ines Marrero-Priegues, E sq . James R. Williams Jr., Esq . Address : 701 Brickell Avenue, Suite 3300 Miami, FL 33131 Property Owner: Sunset-Miami Investments, Inc . Mailing Address : 1313 Ponce De Leon Blvd., #200 Coral Gables, FL 33134 Architect/Engineer: MSA Architects PB 13 -62 Phone : (305) 789-7776 Organization: Holland & Knight, LLP Phone: (305) 789-7776 (305) 1 89-7413 iJ,..er. Signature :fl---/'5 u L r,::v,r -/' _ ... /, __ Phone : (305) 789-7776 Phone: (305) 273-9911 AS THE APPLICANT, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO THIS PROJECT : ...x.. Owner _ Owner's Representative _ Contract to purchase _ Option to purchase _ Tenant/Lessee APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE FOR THE FOLLOWING: PLEASE CHECK THE APPROPRIATE ITEM: _ Text Amendment to LDC _ Zoning Map Amendment _ PUD Approval _ PUD Major Change _Variance _Special Use .llSpecial Exception _Abandonment of ROW _Other (Waiver of Plat) Briefly explain application and cite specific Code sections: Please see the Letter of Intent. Request for LarQe-Scale Development Aooroval. Section :__ Subsection :__ Page#: __ Amended Date: __ _ SUBMITTED MATERIALS PLEASE CHECK ALL THAT APPLY: .x... Letter of intent ~ Justifications for change _ Statement of hardship .x.. Proof of ownership or letter from owner .L Power of attorney _ Contract to purchase .x.. Current survey (1 original sealed and signed/1 reduced copy @ 11" x 17") .x.. 15 copies of Site Plan and Floor Plans 24 x 36", 1 reduced copy@ 11" x 17" .x.. Affidavit-Receipts attesting to mail notices sent .x.. Petition L Mailing labels (3 sets) and map L Required Fee(s) The undersigned has read this c corre e a pli c d app li cati on and represents that the information and all submitted materials are true and lief. and title Upon receipt, applicat ions and all submi tted materials will be reviewed for comp liance with th e La nd Development Code and other applicable reg uJatio.os. Applications fou nd not in compliance will be reje cted and returne d to the app licant. OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Fi led ____ _ Date of PB Hearing, _____ Date of Commission ____ _ Petition Required __ _ Petition Accepted _____ _ Method of Pa me nt Z:\Forms\Current Planning Department Forms\Planning Department Forms\Planning Board\PB -Public Hearing Application - Revised 3-10-2020 .doc 83 Holland & Knight 701 Brickell Avenue, Suite 3300 I Miami, FL 33131 IT 305.789.7744 IF 305 .679.6422 Holland & Knight LLP I www.hklaw.com VIA HAND DELIVERY Alex David City Consultant City of South Miami 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, Florida 33143 July 5, 2022 James R. Williams Jr. (305) 789-7413 James.Williams@hklaw.com Re: Sunset-Miami Investments, Inc./ Maestra Sunset, LLC / 6075 Sunset Drive Amended and Restated Letter of Intent for a Special Exception (the "Application") Dear Mr. David: The undersigned represents both the Applicant, Maestra Sunset, LLC (the "Applicant"), and Sunset-Miami Investments, Inc. (the "Owner"), the owner of the property consisting of± 1.61 acres of land located at 6075 Sunset Drive in South Miami, Florida (the "City") and identified by folio number 09-4025-011-0010 (the "Property"; legally described in Exhibit "A") in connection with a request for a special exception approval for the proposed large scale development of a mixed used commercial/residential project of more than four stories and in excess of 40,000 square feet pursuant to Section 20-8.9 of the City Land Development Regulations. This request is accompanied by a request to rezone the Property from Transit-Oriented Development District (Mixed Use-5) ("TODD (MU-5)") to Transit-Oriented Development District (Mixed Use-6) ("TODD (MU-6)"). An aerial of the Property is included below for your reference and convenience: 84 The Applicant respectfully submits this application to allow for the development of a 10- story mixed use retail/residential project. The plans depict a mixed use building consisting of 316 residential dwelling units, 3,825 square feet of ground floor retail space, and more than 7,500 square feet of public square/plaza contiguous area that is functionally and visually connected to the pedestrian walkway system and designed to include amenities such as benches, shade trees, and additional amenities. In order to achieve the 10-story building proposed, the Applicant is requesting an additional 2 stories of residential units through the use of bonuses available under the TODD (MU-6) District . One (I) additional bonus story will be obtained by providing a secure bike parking room that will also contain loaner bicycles available for use by building residents and employees, a bike repair station, and locker/changing room for the building residents and employees to enjoy, pursuant to Section 20-8.1 0(B). The other additional bonus story will be obtained for providing a public square and plaza of at least seven thousand five hundred (7,500) square feet of contiguous area, functionally and visually connected to the pedestrian walkway system and designed to incorporate benches, shade (trees and structures), play and/or exercise areas, and water stations, pursuant to Section 20-8.1 0(B). Additionally, the proposed development will provide a total of 352 parking spaces, 57 parking spaces more than what is required by Code. The parking calculations are provided in detail in the enclosed site plan package. The design and planning of the project is the result of careful study of the Property's location and its surroundings. Within approximately 350 feet of the Property are several 8-story buildings that complement and support the requested height of the proposed 10-story project. Directly west of the Property, located at 6101 Sunset Drive, is an 8-story mixed use building. While immediately east of the Property is the well-known "Mack Cycle" store location, a 2-story building, there is a commercial office building that abuts it that is at least 8 stories in height and is located on the comer of the intersection at SW 72 Street and SW 59 Place. Additionally, it should be noted that the South Miami Metrorail Station is also located one block east of the Property abutting "Vox Miami", a recently developed 8-story student housing facility. These large scale developments, which are located along SW 72 Street and near South Dixie Highway, act as a necessary transitional buffer for the single-family residential communities located near SW 63 Avenue and SW 72 Street, as well as to the commercial areas along US-1. These existing conditions were the initial contextual references to the design of the overall project. Compliance with Section 20-8.9 of the Code Pursuant to Section 20-8.9 of the Code, special exceptions involving large-scale development projects must meet certain criteria. The following analysis supports such criteria: 1. All such uses shall comply with all requirements established in the appropriate zoning use district, unless additional or more restrictive requirements are set forth below or by the City Commission. Subject to the rezoning application, the proposed development will comply with all requirements established under the TODD (MU-6) category in the Code. 2. All such uses must be of a compatible and complementary nature with any existing or planned surrounding uses. The Property is located along SW 72 Street ("Sunset Drive"), a major artery through the City and approximately one block west of South Dixie Highway. The Property is within 2 #l52881874_v2 85 a quarter mile of several other properties primarily consisting of TODD zoned properties, several zoned TODD (MU-5) and TODD (MU-6). The increased height available under the TODD (MU-6) zoning designation will optimize the unique location benefits of the Property. It will allow future residents to use multimodal transportation, ride sharing services, or be within walking distance of the nearby retail shops, offices, South Miami Hospital facilities, and South Miami Metrorail station, which is located approximately one block to the east of the Property. Furthermore, the proposed 10-story building will only enhance the transitional buffer between the commercial and residential areas and will not be incompatible with the existing 8-story buildings in the area. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity of the proposed use. The special exception request will allow the development of a well-designed mixed use retail/residential project that will support the City's tax base and will not adversely impact the surrounding neighborhood. As stated above, the Property's close proximity to nearby retail shops, offices, medical facilities, and South Miami Metrorail station will actively promote and incentivize residents to walk or use multimodal transportation to access these amenities and services. The close proximity to South Miami Hospital could serve as a housing opportunity for professionals working in the health district. The proposed project will also meet all of the required energy efficient requirements of the Code. 4. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public welfare, property or improvements in the neighborhood Approval of the special exception request will promote the public welfare by promoting the use of mass transit and by encouraging developments that promote these characteristics. Furthermore, the proposed project supports the City's tax base and will not adversely impact the surrounding area. The proposed mixed use commercial/residential project would also provide much-needed affordable housing as defined in Section 20-2.3 of the Code for current and future residents of the City in connection with the requirements set forth in Section 20-8.4(D) of the Code. 5. The proposed development complies with all other applicable Code provisions. The proposed project will meet all other Code requirements. Based on the foregoing, we respectfully request your favorable review and recommendation of approval of this request. Thank you in advance for your considerate attention to this matter. Please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information. Cc: James R. Williams Jr., Esq. #152881874 _v2 Sincerely, HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP ( I f Ines Marrero-Priegues 3 86 Exhibit "A" Property Legal Description ALL OF TRACT A, LESS THE EAST 118 FEET OF THE NORTH 129.07 FEET, IN BLOCK 1, AND LOT 3, IN BLOCK 1, OF "ROSSWOOD", ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, AT PAGE 62 IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI- DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE SOUTH 25 FEET OF SAID BLOCK I. 4 #152881874_v2 87 SPBCXAL WJUUlAll'l'Y DBBD (lfi.tb Jo.ind.er) 'l'BXS SPBCJ:AL WJUtRAH'rY DEED . is . made on thi.s ..11,;L_t::k., day · of /11 C/<,r:.}A..,, . , ·1993, by the . RESOLUTl:ON TRUST CORPORATION, as Recelver of Profeasiona1 Federa1 Savings Bank, whose aC,dress is 100 Co1ony Square, suite 2300, At1anta, Georgia, 30361, as GRAN'l'OR, to SUNSET-MIAMI :INVESTMENTS, TNC. , a Florida corporation, whose address is 7450· N.W. 5th Street, suite 1, Plantation, Fl.orida EE_, and whose Federal. tax identification number is ' . WX'l'NBBB that . Granter, for good and valuab;t.e consideration, receipt of which is ack.nowl.edged., grants, bargains and se1l.s_to Grantee a1J. the real. property located in the county of Dade, state of Fl.orida, more parti~ul.arl.y described on BKh.ild.t "A" attao~ed hereto and made a paz:t hereof 1 together . with ·al.J. tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto; subject to· that _ ce:r:tain purchase money mortgage from Grantee to Granter in the amount of $975,000.00, current rea1 property taxes, zoning and ot;her governmental. restrictions, and al.l. covenants, conditions, restrictions, easements, rights-of-way and other matters of record. T~e Tax Fol.io Number is: 09· 4025 011 0010.· Grantor .hereby covenants with Grantee that Granter wi1l. forever defend Grantee aqainst c1aims· of al.1. persons cl.aiming by, through or-under Grantor. No other covenants or warranties, express or impl.ied, ar_e given by this Special. Warranty Deed. XR WXTRBBS WHEREOF, Granter has set its hand and seal. the day and year first above written. Witnesses: ~ ~b Name ~--F lntec\ ~ · /:-t vt: c=:r-rc""-:.s...-/-f"~.,--r--;o,..,...4~;,..,,#,-'h.,. ..... state of ~q• 6-, . County of p.K" t Lb The ResoJ.ution Trust corporation a$ Receiver for Professional. Federai Savings Bank (SEAL) By:~-=..c:=..--=--_;~....£.;=,":ir:::::P.C....---=--- Name: ...l;.J.l;l![l:~1;2~---!~~~~~~~==--• pursuant of -Attorney recorded in Official. Records Book l.5761; Page 5672 of tb,e Pub1i.c Records of Dade county, F1orida DOCSTF'DEE 7,81)0.0•J sur.:rx 5,8~0.00 HARVEY RU\/11-1, C-LERK DADE COUNTY~ FL ~he foregoing instrument was acknowl.ed~~ore me th1s /~ day of . ~h,.. , l. 9 9 3 , by C..At'/i'lr,&.. ~~,Pt:"-, on behaJ.r of the Resol.ution Trust Corporation ; a ·corporation .organized and·exiating under the 1aws of the U~te2 States, who is personal.1y known to me or has produced -Pf -as identification and who did not take an oath. ~ . . . .,,.,, . : /' '.(~~AAY.i~~L) ~ .• • ' " ,. y·· ,_ -: --r :.: r~~ ~ ~:-·--. \. -\ a ·-:-,-:: . 'e,: = .·\ : · ··.f" 1J D L _.-·,_. f ~ " ,... • ••• -Ir.. ;" <-,-.. o"'" ·····~··· ,s;-1• .. ~PzeparM ,by, and return to: James S. Groh, Esq. HOLLAND & KNIGHT 1200 Briokei°J. Avenue ·,-··•triam:I. ,····FI.;·-3 3131:··:··--.... · ···· MJ:A-104998 Name: t:'??2-n¼~ ~~- Nota~y Publ.ic, State of ~G Co_!111Dission No.: . ftotar, Public, Ca.bb Couni:Y. Geor.ala lly Commission &pin,, December 21, 199!, 88 Rff: I 585Qr&l J 40 RESOLUTJ:ON . TRUST CORPORATION, acti.ng :Ln .its eapac.ity as . Receiver of P~o£essiona1 Savi.nga bank, predecesaor-.in-.interest t~ Gran~or with respect to the abpve-descr~bed real property, hereby conveys and qnitcl,aims to Grantee any and all. interest it may have in the real property, and hereby joins in the conveyance of the ·· • real. property ta Grantee, without war-ranty, said p:r-ope~y having previous~y been conveyed to Grantor. W.itnessesz RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION as Receiver of Professional sav~ngs Bank · f:::G~By, ~ ~ Name: PAvL,;T'TE Si(vY-kl.A/.,lb Name~~ state o~ Georq, c...., county o'f De,.J::.e,...c.J,, pursuant tC? Power: of Attorney recorded in Offi.ci.a1 Records Book 15761, Page 5672 of the Publ.ic Records of Dade county, F1orida . The forego.ing instrument was _acknowled~fore me this /o"- day of ~e.-'-, 1993, by CA~ H~D~,1,.., ,. on behalf of Reso:Lution Trust corporation, a corporation ex..i.sting under the ·l.aws of t .he United States of--Ameri.ca, who is personal.ly known to · me o:i: has produced a 9 p• as identi;_fication and who did not take an oath. <,.~A:J'¥,,~~) .. , .. ,,'ti':. : • -_,,,.,,,: • .... ~.... : ·~ ... -.•· .. ·····• .. ,,,r,. ~ ... ,. ~ .. ,.. . . ..,,. ~ § .:-0:• :~\ Q 1' AR y·\-i:-•.\ -~-~J'··~ •• ···\ t ··: ..,_ .. . . C. " '.-~· .. -.;_~iu D \_\ i . t %. ~ .... :. . •• •· .. ,.,,,. ✓ .... -~-.. ':-....... •_:.,_"\, _.,-. -t;?.~ ... ~-.... .,, ..... MXA-104,999 -··· Name: ~ .R ,,J.>:?cn:-... Notary .. Pub1i.e, State 0£ ..../ifea>?,9 <a Commission No.: • • . • liotafvPubJfc;, Cobb Cauntr. Glnla IIJ Comm"lsston Expires December 1(1995 •'• ... . ....... . . -, .. 89 aEt: I 5850ttli 4 f '· EXHIBIT .... ,, -• • I • • •. • I,:• • : • ~.•' : '·· . L-,gal Deecrlpllon All. o ·f tract A,.• l.ess the East 118 feet of the No.rtn 129.07 feet, ..i.n Bl.ocl<: ·1, c1.nd Lot 3, in Bl.ock 1, 0£ Rosewood·, according to·the Plat thereof, rec;:9rded in Plat .Book 13, at Page 62,· Oin the Public Records of. Dade County, Fl.Or.ida, J.eas . the South · 25 feet of ~aid Bl.odk 1. · \ . : 20 .. -...... •. ... . -=~~ .. ·~-~ .. : ' "·:.:.·;.~::--: .......... ; . -·• .... , .. _.i -~= . . .. .(, .. , . 90 -~~!> _· ,COU~THOUSE .-TOWER ·. DAT ICW-LIICV ! . . LOCATiott· •• ·-. fi • ,. • ••• •••• • • . ; aEt: I 5850rtll 4 f ': ·· EXHIBIT .. A~• . Legal Description All o·f tract A,.· l.ess the Bast 118 feet of -:the No.rth 129_.07 . . feet., .,j.n Bl.oc~ ·1, and Lot 3, in Bl.ock 1, 0£ Rosewood·, acc~rdi.ng to.the· Plat thereof, recc;,rded in Plat .Book 13., at Page 62, 'in the l?ub1ic Records of Oade County, Fl.orida, l.ess the South 25 feet of said Bl.ock 1. · 20 · . . ... ~ ' .. .. .~fq:-J~,~~_.,:~u~,: .... , l ... •k' ,,_..:-,;: ... ,. ·-,1 •:: ··-~ 91 Owner's Authorization to City of South Miami, Florida and Holland & Knight, LLP, to File Land Use and Zoning Applications for Mixed Use Project Sunset-Miami Investments, Inc. ("Owner") is the owner of that property in the City of South Miami generally located at 6075 Sunset Drive in South Miami, Florida and identified by folio number 09-4025-011-0010 (the "Property"). Owner has authorized the law firm of Holland & Knight, LLP, with offices at 701 Brickell Avenue, Suite 3300, Miami, Florida 33131 to file applications with the City of South Miami for (I) a rezoning application, (2) a request for a special exception approval for the proposed large scale development of a mixed used commercial/residential project of more than four stories and in excess of40,000 square feet pursuant to Section 20-8.9 of the City Land Development Regulations, and (3) any other zoning related application(s) necessary for the development of the proposed mixed use project being designed by MSA Architects. Holland & Knight, LLP has been authorized to submit all related documents and to represent the Owner in meetings with the City's professional staff, make representation and presentations before the City of South Miami's Planning Board and the City of South Miami's City Commission. The foregoing was acknowledged this ,19 of November, 2021 . Title: ------------ Company Address: I 2 / .3 A,,,., r 'f!. /~ /~.--- {; c, ,,.J t::-L'4 Pf-2 J13~ #152461767_vl 92 Building Code Services Civil Engineering/ Roadway & Highway Design Coastal Engineering Code Enforcement Construction Engineering & Inspection (CEI) Construction Services Data Technologies & Development Electrical Engineering Engineering Environmental Services Facilities Management Grant Management & Writing Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Governmental Services Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) Landscape Architecture Planning Project Management Redevelopment & Urban Design Surveying & Mapping Transportation & Mobility Transportation Planning Water/ Utilities Engineering Website Development Bayshore Executive Plaza 10800 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 950 Miam i, FL 33161 Tel : 786.485 .5200 Fax : 786.1520 www.cgasolutions .com TO: FROM: Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc . A SAFEbuilt COM NY July 17, 2022 Shari Kamali, City Manager City of South Miami Planning and Zoning Department Alex A. David, AICP ~flf1w.r1 City Planning Consultant PROPERTY: 6075 Sunset Drive FOLIO: 09-4025-011-0010 RE : Sunset-Miami Investments, lnc./Maestra Sunset LLC Concurrency Analysis I have reviewed the referenced project in relation to the City's Levels of Service Standards (Concurrency): CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI -CONCURRENCY ANALYSIS Redevelopment of a vacant parcel into a mixed-use development FROM: Vacant TO: 5,178 sq. ft. of retail and leasing office uses 316 Dwelling units Change in Number Units : +316 additional DU's Change in Non-Residential Square Footage : 0 to 5,178 = +5, 178 sq . ft . additional Non-Residential Square Footage Change in Number Persons (2.46 persons per household): 0 to 777 = + 777 persons FORT LAUDERDALE MIAMI-DADE WEST PALM BEACH CLEARWATER/ TAMPA ESTERO PORT ST LUCIE 93 The 1.624-acre subject property is currently designated Transit-Oriented Development District (TODD) on the Future Land Use Map . The impacts of build-out, based on the proposed submittal, on the City's ability to meet its adopted Level of Service standards are summarized below. As seen below the City will continue to meet its Level of Service standards. Level of Service Analysis This analysis is based on those standards contained 1n the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan. Transportaiion : See Traffic Study l. Roadway Adopted LOS Standards -LOS D + 50% (US l) or E (Sunset Drive) ( depending on roadway) 2. N t P . t T . ( D. ff e roiec nps 1 eren 10 -t' I V t aeon vs. 1xe se M . d U ) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Vehicle Trips Vehicle Trips In Out Total In Out Total ExistinQ Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 Proposed Trips 53 40 93 38 46 84 Net External Trip Difference 53 40 93 38 46 84 3. Standards Met? Yes Source: 6075 Sunset Drive, Traffic Study, Richard Garcia & As sociates (June 29, 2022 Update) Potable Water: Residential LOS Standard -115 gallons per capita per day Non-residential LOS Standard -No Standard Estimated impact-+ 89,396 gallons per day based on residential population only Current consumption - 0 Projected consumption at build out -89,396 94 Current capacity-322. l MGD (MDWASD) Sources: City of South Miami 2020 Water Supply Plan and MDWASD Sanitary Sewer: INF Policy l. l .4 Sanitary sewer level-of-service for sewered areas shall be as follows: the project flow plus the maximum day flow (the average of the five highest daily flows) of the preceding calendar year shall not exceed 98 percent of the county treatment system's rated capacity. Otherwise, septic tanks shall be the level-of- service. Source: South Miami Comprehensive Plan, Infrastructure Element Drainage INF Policy l.3.2 The City's adopted Level of Service Standard for stormwater drainage shall be protection from the degree of flooding that would result from a flood that has a one-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. Source: South Miami Comprehensive Plan, Infrastructure Element Solid Waste: INF OBJECTIVE 1.2 Maintain solid waste collection services to residents and businesses within the City at the current level of service measurability. INF Policy 1.2. l Pursuant to the City's interlocal agreement with Miami-Dade County for use of the County Solid Waste Management System, the County shall insure that the System, which includes County-owned solid waste disposal facilities and those operated under contract with the County for disposal, for a minimum of five years, collectively maintain an amount of solid waste disposal capacity sufficient to accommodate waste flows committed to the system through long-term interlocal agreements or contracts with municipalities and haulers, and anticipated non- committed waste flows. 95 Source: South Miami Comprehensive Plan, Infrastructure Element Parks & Recreation: REC Policy 1.1.1 Retain the existing park acreage (includes City and School Board recreation acreage) and facilities, thereby providing a level-of-service standard of 4 acres per 1,000 population. Based on 2019 Census Bureau Data - 1 l, 911 LOS Standard - 4 acres/1,000 residents Estimated impact of additional residents -+3.1 acres Current park acres required to meet LOS Standard (Based on Current Population) -47 .644 acres Projected park acres required to meet LOS Standard at maximum build out -50.7 4 acres Existing park acres (City-47.84 acres and MDCPS -3.77 acres) -51.61 acres Projected Surplus - + 0.866 acres Sources: South Miami Comprehensive Plan, Recreation and Open Space City Park Inventory List U.S. 2020 Census Schools: School Concurrency Memo -Attached Source: Miami-Dade County Public Schools 96 Superintendent of Schools Dr. Jose L. Dotres July 18, 2022 YIA ELECTRONIC MAIL Ms. Mercy Arce Holland and Knight 701 Brickell Ave. unit 3300 Miami, FL 33131 mercy.arce @hklaw .com giving our students the world Miami-Dade County School Board Perla Tabares Hantman, Chair Dr. Steve Gallon Ill. Vice Chair Lucia Baez-Geller Dr. Dorothy Bendross-Mindinga/1 Christi Fraga Dr. Lubby Navarro Dr. Marla Perez Mari Tere Rojas Luisa Santos RE: PUBLIC SCHOOL CONCURRENCY ANALYSIS FOR MAESTRO SUNSET, LLC-PB-22-012 LOCATED 6075 SUNSET DRIVE PH0922062700291-FOLIO NO.: 0940250110010 Dear Applicant: Pursuant to State Statutes and the lnterlocal Agreements for Public School Facility Planning in Miami-Dade County, the above-referenced application was reviewed for compliance with Public School Concurrency. Accordingly, enclosed please find the School District's Preliminary Concurrency Analysis (Schools Planning Level Review). As noted in the Preliminary Concurrency Analysis (Schools Planning Level Review), the proposed development would yield a maximum residential density of 316 residential units, which generate 31 students, 15 at the elementary, 7 at the middle and 7 at the senior high school level. At this time, all school levels have sufficient capacity available to serve the application. However, a final determination of Public School Concurrency and capacity reservation will only be made at the time of approval of final plat, site plan or functional equivalent, notwithstanding any additional information that may surface after further departmental research. As such, this analysis does not constitute a Public School Concurrency approval. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 305-995-7285 . •;•rds,_¾/4 Ivan M .~~ RA •~ Director U 0 Enclosure L-007 cc: Ms. Nathaly Simon City of South Miami School Concurrency Master File Governrnental ,;jffa.1rs &-LnncJ Use fv7s Nalhaly Si!non, Design and Planning Officer• 1450 N.E 2nd Avenue• Suite 525 •Miami.FL 33132 305-995-7285 • 305-995 4760 (FAX)• nsimon1@c!adeschoojs nei 97 ~ Q MDCPS Application Number: Date Application Received: Type of Application: Applicant's Name: Address/Location: Master Folio Number: Additional Folio Number(s): PROPOSED # OF UNITS SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNITS: SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED UNITS: MULTIFAMILY UNITS: Concurrency Management System (CMS) Miami-Dade County Public Schools Miami-Dade County Public Schools Concurrency Management System Preliminary Concurrency Analysis PH0922062700291 6/27/2022 12:31 :43 PM Public Hearing Maestro Sunset, LLC 6075 Sunset Drive 0940250110010 316 o_ .0 316 Local Government (LG): LG Application Number: Sub Type: South Miami PB-22-012 RedeveloP-!rumt MDCPS has conducted a preliminary public school concurrency review of this application; please see results above. A final determination of public school concurrency and capacity reservation will be made at the time of approval of plat, site plan or functional equivalent. THIS ANALYSIS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE PUBLIC SCHOOL CONCURRENCY APPROVAL. 1450 NE 2 Avenue, Room 525, Miami, Florida 33132 / 305-995-7285 / concurrency@dadeschools.net 98 April 29, 2022 City of South Miami Planning & Zoning Department 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami FL 33143 RE : Property Owners List within 500 feet of: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: All of Tract A, less the East 118 feet of the North 129.07 feet, in Block 1 and Lot 3, in Block 1, of "ROSSWOOD", according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 13 at Page 62 of the Public Records of Miami-Dade County, Florida. FOLIO: 09-4025-011 -0010 LOCATION: 6075 Sunset Drive, South Miami, FL 33143 PREPARED FOR: HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP ORDER: 220420 Total number of property owners without repetition: 289 This is to certify that the attached ownership list, map and mailing matrix is a complete and accurate representation of the real estate property and property owners within 500 feet of the subject property listed above. This reflects the most current records on the file in Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser's Office. Sincerely, THE ZONING SPECIALISTS GROUP, INC. 62-e a~ 2 'k;i Omara R. Lopez For the Firm 7729 NW 146th Street • Miami Lakes , FL 33016 Phone : 305 828-1210 www.thezoningspecialistsgroup.com 1 99500-FOOT RADIUS MAP OF: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: All of Tract A, less the East 118 feet of the North 129.07 feet, in Block 1 and Lot 3, in Block 1, of "ROSSWOOD", according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 13 at Page 62 of the Public Records of Miami-Dade County, Florida. FOLIO: 09-4025-011-0010 LOCATION: 6075 Sunset Drive, South Miami, FL 33143 PREPARED FOR: HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP ORDER: 220420 DATE: April 29, 2022 N w♦• s SCALE: 1"= 150' :) The Zoning Specialists Group, Inc. 7729 NW 146th Street Miami Lakes FL 33016 Ph: (305)828-1210 www.thezoningspecialistsgroup.com :,io __ j -----··-_,_......,,~, ~ ~ r-[L -' · --\ -1\ I _ I~ -·c_[],~-I 1 i ~"'1"~!.r "" -~ l i..."'O ~•'~""":1~·" ~ a ~1\l .,, LJJ\ ' -!!.t,miJ]\1 ~~n-_.f:I>!_ r ~··•,~~r.;;1•• j .~.. ,., ·\ J~L(:J~ .-"-~(• ,., ·1 3 ~, \ '" --,-····-. ' . ~ ' ~ ~ ___ .. ~<:':) \ • a,e l -~.-m -r71\~ r-.\1 \ cr;mi~fu..i,,,:10:1•;11 -"""---1.·:~ I -. \'' ·_L_. ,,.,-·\. ,~ T 'Loo "r -1 t-L-.\1-U;,..-!.~•-.&~i-~ / ' .,, , ~-~ -~ I I -' .... ~ ~• 1 .t~lli.l)A.Uj ,., I ! Ll ~, "' ;;. ' ., --------: ~,l"t .. " r1 I ,_:_JI L _wo \ ·--1 ~. I I~\ ~ I 100 April 29, 2022 City of South Miami Planning & Zoning Department 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami FL 33143 RE: Abutting Property Owners List of: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: All of Tract A, less the East 118 feet of the North 129.07 feet, in Block 1 and Lot 3, in Block 1, of "ROSSWOOD", according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 13 at Page 62 of the Public Records of Miami-Dade County, Florida. FOLIO: 09-4025-011-0010 LOCATION: 6075 Sunset Drive, South Miami, FL 33143 PREPARED FOR: HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP ORDER: 220420 TOTAL NUMBER OF LABELS WITHOUT REPETITION: 19 This is to certify that the attached ownership list, map and mailing matrix is a complete and accurate representation of the real estate property and property owners abutting the subject property listed above . This reflects the most current records on the file in Miami-Dade County Tax Assessor's Office. Sincerely, THE ZONING SPECIALISTS GROUP, INC. 5 6-ca~Z 1:_~ Omara R. Lopez, For the Firm 7729 NW 146th Street • Miami Lakes . FL 33016 Phone : 305 828-1210 WNw .thezoningspecialistsgroup .com 1 101ABUTTING PROPERTIES MAP: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: All of Tract A, less the East 118 feet of the North 129.07 feet, in Block 1 and Lot 3, in Block 1, of "ROSSWOOD", according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 13 at Page 62 of the Public Records of Miami-Dade County, Florida. FOLIO: 09-4025-011-0010 LOCATION: 6075 Sunset Drive, South Miami, FL 33143 PREPARED FOR: HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP ORDER: 220420 DATE: April 29, 2022 'N ·♦· SCALE: 1"= 100' ;) The Zoning Specialists Group, Inc. 7729 NW 146th Street Miami Lakes FL 33016 Ph: (305)828-1210 www.thezoningspecialistsgroup.com ST 010 LARKIN CENTER Q:y) t; ----1i ~ ~o 11 ---;,"'1-N TI:N□ ~T 120 !NJ7Clr►IS! 001 150 I '° i 130 190 200 180 §,_IV J'(ITH ST LLLLL n LLLLL 011 LLLLL _, L L L L ,l.RCIAl. lARKJI-ISi,m ----1LLL0LLL [Ji1 L=cLLLLLLLLL LLL~LL~LLLL 010 LLLLLLL LLLL . . LLLLL-1=-b-=-c:· . . ~ t=I--. -,-L...,..-L-,-L--;lrT[ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 av,11,sr _L~LL LLLLL:LL LLI\ I IL'= LLLLLLLLL t~~Cttt~* LLllLLLL -LLlLLLok_L LLULLLL8 LLULLLL L~QLLL.L l :-CCLLL ~LLLLL SW_ n,_LD ST I ; 6'/J. T.!li 160 CCJ.IMERCIAL LARKINS I I IAL LARK1"6AMD ~ :i: 001 !ii ~ _,J ------r--.L..1--7t \;; ;; LLLLLLLU CLLLLLLLL LLLLLLLL LLLLLLLL LLLLLLLL LLLLLLLL LLLLLLLL LLLLLLLL LLLLLLLL ~ _LLLLLLLL 080 170 01 $'./J~OS 102 AFFIDAVIT Before me, the undersigned, this day personally appeared James R. Williams Jr., who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. I am an authorized legal representative with express authorization from Maestra Sunset, LLC, the owner of that property at 6075 Sunset Drive, in South Miami (the "Application Property''). 2. In my capacity as authorized representative and land use attorney, I supervised and hereby certify that a Notification Letter of Application to the rezone the property from Transit-Oriented Development District (Mixed Use-5) ("TODD (MU-5)") to Transit- Oriented Development District (Mixed Use-6) ("TODD (MU-6)") and a special exception applications for 6075 Sunset Drive in the form attached herewith as Exhibit "A " and herein incorporated by reference, was mailed, via U.S. mail to all the addresses enumerated in the ownership list attached as Exhibit "B", the property owners within 500 feet of the Application Property, except for the property owners of abutting or contiguous properties, identified and enumerated as such in Exhibit "C", to which the Notification Letter was mailed via Certified US Mail. Further Affiant sayeth not. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE James R. Williams Jr., Esq. Title: Attorney for Applicant Maestra Sunset, LLC The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me of [2J physical presence or D online notarization, this 29th day of June, 2022, by James R. Williams Jr., as legal representative of Maestra Sunset, LLC, on behalf of the Applicant, who is personally known to me or who has produced _____ as identification. (NOTARIAL SEAL] _.··if~>·,. MERCY ARCE \;t ~\:J MYCOMMl~ION#Hti05'416 '-~,~•"'' EXPIRES. October 18, 2024 ·-... ~~:! .. ~•·•· Bonded Thru Notary Public; Underwrllerw o/fk Print Name: Mercy Arce Notary Public, State of Florida Commission#: HH 054416 My Commission Expires : 10/18/2024 103 Exhibit "A" Notification Letter 104 Notification Letter Proposed Development of Residential Project Address of Application Property: 6075 Sunset Drive South Miami, FL 33143 Applicant: Maestra Sunset, LLC You are hereby notified that the Applicant has submitted an application to the City of South Miami (the "City") requesting to rezone the property from Transit-Oriented Development District (Mixed Use-5) ("TODD (MU-5)") to Transit-Oriented Development District (Mixed Use-6) ("TODD (MU-6)"). A special exception application has also been submitted to the City for the proposed development of a large scale mixed use commercial/residential development consisting of more than four stories and in excess of 40,000 square feet. The requests will be considered by the Planning & Zoning Board and the City Commission. The City's Planning and Zoning Department, located at 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, will have on file all documents, plans and supporting materials pertaining to this application. In addition, the City's Planning and Zoning Department will prepare and mail the required public hearing notices in accordance with the City's Land Development Code. #158251983_vl 105 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC OF THE SPECIAL VIRTUAL MEETING OF THE PLANNING BOARD In order to balance the need for the City of South Miami to function and conduct vital business during the COVID 19 pandemic and, at the same time, to protect the health, safety and welfare of its citizens, officers, officials and administrative staff, and pursuant City of South Miami Code, Chapter 286.011, Fla. Stat, and the City's Home Rule Powers, the City will be holding its Planning Board Meeting live in chambers and VIRTUALLY through communications media technology (CMT) until social distancing is no longer required by any relevant Executive Orders. The special meeting is scheduled to begin on Tues day , July 26, 2022, at 7:00 p.m. to consider the following public hearing items: 1. PB-22-011 Applicant: Maestra Sunset, LLC An Ordinance pursuant to Section 20-5.7 of the Land Development Code providing for a Map Amendment to the City of South Miami Official Zoning Map from Transit-Oriented Development District Mixed-Use 5 (TODD MU-5) to Transit-Oriented Development District Mixed-Use 6 (TODD MU-6) on a 1.6124-acre (70,236 sq. ft.) property located at 6075 Sunset Drive and as legally described herein. 2. PB-22-012 Applicant: Maestra Sunset, LLC A Resolution pursuant to Section 20-8.9 and other provisions of the City of South Miami Land Development Code approving by Special Exception a large-scale development on a 1.6124- acre (70,236 sq. ft.) property located at 6075 Sunset Drive and as legally described herein. All Board members as well as City staff will participate by video conferencing at City Hall or at remote locations through the Zoom platform, and members of the public may join the meeting via either Zoom at (t1ll l. .'//lHJm.us, ]u,-c:.<,6:~Ci.138 by phone by calling +1-786-635-1003 and entering Meeting ID: 3056636338 when prompted, or in person in the Commission Chambers, and where their appearance will be broadcast on the Zoom platform, and where they can participate. If you desire to present evidence, attend in Commission Chambers or you are unable to use Zoom, there are procedures to follow and other options available including a dedicated phone line to listen and parti c ipate in th e meeting and limited publi c attendance , all of whi ch is set forth in the meetin g notice posted at City Hall and at !l\l:): ·,· \'-, ..... :::lHilhmiamiJl.ccu\ 5'.JJ !'1;i)i,:-\'i~'\'li11:.!.:-:-\,J:1\:v . Anyone who wishes to review the pending applic ation and supporting documentation in pe r son must m ake an a ppointment by calling 305-6 63-63 2 7 or 3 05 -663 -6331 . Note that pursuant to Florida St:itutes 286.0 I 05. a person who decides to appeal any decision made by a Board, Agency or Commission with respect to any matter considered at its meeting or hearing, a record of the proceedings will be required for said appeal and such person will be required to have a verbatim transcript ofthc proceedings including the testimony :ind evidence upon which the appeal is to be based ADA: To request a modification to a policy. practice or procedure or to n:quest an auxiliary aide 106 or service in order to participate in a City program, activity or event, you must on or before 4:00 p.m. 3 business days (not counting the day of the meeting) before the meeting deliver your request to the City Clerk by telephone: 305-722-8686 (voice) or 305-442- 1600 (TTY/TDD) or by mail at 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida or email at npayne@southmiamifl.gov. I I I --I .J I I \ L ______ j 1---~------ sw 71ST ST ~ w > <( I- (f) ~ <O ~ er, SW72NDST 7--r _j I Q... I :r: I I ·t;; ~75 I lD -s (f) ,---_) 107 MIAMI-DADE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNlY OF MIAMI-DADE : Before the undersigned authority persona lly appeared GUILLERMO GARCIA , who on oath says that he or she is the DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS, Legal Notices of the Miami Daily Business Review f/k/a Miami Review, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami in Miami-Dade County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a Legal Advertisement of Notice in the matter of CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI -SPECIAL VIRTUAL MEETING OF THE PLANNING BOARD -JU L. 26, 2022 in the XXXX Court, was published in said newspaper by print in the issues of and/or by publication on the newspaper's website, if authorized, on 07/15/2022 Alliant further says that the newspaper complies with all legal for publication in chapter 50, Florida :ifi~'<. CHRIS~ LYNN RAVIX E•=:i:•l Commlssion#GG2m7t ~'),·. · :~s c....i-Noventar 19 2022 ~~ii,t• O~~ ...... ..,..,.IN I ........ r,i,••· Bonded Thru Troy Fakl NIIRIIIC8 e(I0.385-7019 C ITY OF SOUTH MIAM I, FLORIDA NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC OF THE SPECIAL VIRTUAL MEETING OF THE PLANNING BOARD In order to balance the need for the City of South Miami to function and conduct vital business during the COVID 19 pandemic and, at the same time, to protect the health, safety and welfare ·of its citizens, officers, officials and administrative staff, and pursuant City of South Miami Code, Chapter 286.011, Fla . Stat, and the City's Home Rule Powers, the City will be holding its Planning Board Meeting live in chambers and VIRTUALLY through communications media technology (CMT) until social distancing· is no longer required by any relevant Executive Orders. The special meeting is scheduled to begin on Tuesday, July 26. 2022, at 7:00 p.m. to C(!nsider the following public hearing items: 1. PB-22-010 Applicant: WD Partners A Resolution pursuant to Section 20-3.4(8)(4)(a)(ii) of the City of South Miami Land Development Code approving a Special Use application to modify the site plan for an existing Convenience Restaurant located at 6290 S. Dixie Highway. 2. PB-22-011 Applicant: Maestra Sunset, LLC An Ordinance pursuant to Section 20-5. 7 of the Land Development Code providing for a Map Amendment to the City of South Miami Official Zoning Map from Transit-Oriented Development District Mixed-Use 5 (TODD MU-5) to Transit-Oriented Development District Mixed-Use 6 (TODD MU-6) on a 1.6124-acre (70 ,236 sq. ft.) property located at 6075 Sunset Drive and as legally described herein. . -:r, 3. PB-22-012 Applicant: Maestra Sunset, LLC A Resolution pursuant to Section 20-8.9 and other provisions of the City of South Miami Land Development Code approving by Special Exception a large-scale development on a 1.6124-acre (70,236 sq. ft.) property locat ed at 6075 Sunset Drive and as legally described herein . 108 All Board members as well as City staff will participate by video conferencing at City Hall .or at remote locations through the Zoom platform, and memb et s of the public may join the meeting via either Zoom _at_ (bttps://t oorn.usfi/305!?636338), by phone by calling +1-786-635-1003 and· entering Meeting ID: 3056636338 when prompted, or in persori in )he Commission Chambers, and where their appearance will be broadcast on !he Zoom pIatiorm, and where they can participate. If you desire to present evidence, atte nd in Commission Chambers or you are unable to use Zoom, there are procedures to follow and other options available Including a dedicated phone li ne to li sten and participate In the meeting and limltE!d public attendance , all of which Is set forth In the meeting notice posted at City Hall and athttp://www.southmiamill.g·ov/580/Publlc-Meetings-Noti ces 11.n yone who wishe s to review the pendlng application and su pporting documentation in person must make an appointment by calling 305-663-6327 or 305-663-6331. · Note that pursuant to Florida StaMes 286.0105, a person who decides to appea l any decision made by a Board , Agency or Commission with respect lo any matter considered at 11s meeting or hearing, a /ecord of the proceed ings will be req uired for said appeal and such person will be required to have a verb atim ti:anscript of the proceedings in.eluding the testimony .and evidence upon wt,ich the appeal is to be based ADA: To iequest a modificati_on to a policy, practice or procedure or to requesLan auxiliary ai de or service in order to participate in a Cfty program, activity or eve nt, you must on or before 4:00 p.m. 3 business days (n ot counting the day of the mealing) before the meeting deliver your request-to the City Clerk by telephone: 305-722-8686 (voice) or 305-442-1600 (TTY/TDD) or by mail at 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida or email at npayne@southmiamifl.gov. 7/15 :22-78/0000608435M 6075 Sunset Drive Traffic Impact Study Richard Garcia & Associates, Inc. 6075 Sunset Drive South Miami, Florida April 12th, 2022 June 29th, 2022 (Update) (Update with Responses to the City's Traffic Review Comments) 109 110 607 5 Sunset Drive Traffic Im p act Stud y Engineer's Certification I, Carlos X. Valentin, P.E. # 78422, certify that I currently hold an active Professional Engi neers Licens e in the State of Florida and am competent throu gh education and experience to provide engineering services in the civil and traffic engineering disciplines contained in thi s report . In addition, the firm Richard Garcia & Associates, Inc. holds a Certificate of Authorization # 9592 in the State of Florida. I further certify that this report was prepared by me or under my responsible charge as defined in Chapter 6 1G15-18.001 F.A.C. and th at all statements, conclusions and recommendations made herein are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and ability. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT LOCATION: 6075 Sunset Drive -Tr affic Impact Study 607 5 Sunset Drive South Miami, Flor ida I \' Florida Registration Ncl.O'Sf\2211 1 '' Date ~~,& RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page ii 6075 Sunset Drive Traffic Impact Study RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer’s Certification .......................................................................................... ii Traffic Study Review Comments & Responses ..................................................... 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 5 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 8 Project Location / Description ............................................................................................ 8 Existing Condition ................................................................................................. 10 Turning Movement Counts (TMC's) .................................................................................. 10 Existing Intersection Capacity / Level of Service (LOS) Analysis ................................. 10 Project Traffic......................................................................................................... 13 Trip Generation ................................................................................................................... 13 Trip Distribution .................................................................................................................... 15 Trip Assignment ................................................................................................................... 16 Proposed Future Condition .................................................................................. 18 Background Traffic Growth ............................................................................................... 18 Committed Developments ............................................................................................... 18 Future Intersection Traffic Volumes - AM & PM Peak Hour .......................................... 18 Future Intersection Capacity / LOS Analysis .................................................................. 18 Roadway Link Analysis ......................................................................................... 21 Conclusion ............................................................................................................ 22 111 6075 Sunset Drive Traffic Impact Study RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page iv LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location Map ........................................................................................................... 8 Figure 2: Site Plan ..................................................................................................................... 9 Figure 3: Existing Seasonally Adjusted TMC's - AM Peak Hour ........................................ 11 Figure 4: Existing Seasonally Adjusted TMC's - PM Peak Hour ......................................... 12 Figure 5: TAZ Map ................................................................................................................... 15 Figure 6: Site Traffic (Project Net Trips) - AM Peak Hour ................................................... 16 Figure 7: Site Traffic (Project Net Trips) - PM Peak Hour ................................................... 17 Figure 8: Future Condition with Project - AM Peak Hour ................................................ 19 Figure 9: Future Condition with Project - PM Peak Hour .................................................. 20 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Intersection LOS Summary - AM & PM Peak Hour ............................................... 7 Table 2: Existing Condition LOS & Delay - AM & PM Peak .............................................. 11 Table 3: Trip Generation - AM Peak Hour ........................................................................... 14 Table 4: Trip Generation - PM Peak Hour ........................................................................... 14 Table 5: Directional Trip Distribution Percentages ............................................................ 15 Table 6: Directional Trip Assignment ................................................................................... 16 Table 7: Future Intersection LOS & Delay - AM & PM Peak Hour ................................... 19 Table 8: Roadway Link Volumes and LOS .......................................................................... 21 APPENDICES Appendix 1: Trip Generation Appendix 2: Trip Distribution / Assignment Appendix 3: Signal Timing, Background Growth and Adjustment Factor Appendix 4: Traffic Counts (TMC's) & Committed Development Appendix 5: Intersection & Roadway Capacity / LOS Analysis 112 6075 Sunset Drive Traffic Impact Study RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 1 Traffic Study Review Comments & Responses This section provides responses to the City of South Miami traffic review comments prepared by Calvin Giordano & Associates, Inc dated June 15th, 2022. We hereby offer the following responses in an effort to address the comments made. REVIEW COMMENTS 1) Raw Turning Movement Counts should be adjusted using the PSCF. Volume development sheets show the SF being used instead of the PSCF. Response: We respectfully disagree with the reviewer. The appropriate traffic data adjustment is the Seasonal Factor (SF) and not the Peak Season Conversion Factor (PSCF) as indicated to us by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) which is the agency responsible for developing the adjustment factors and their respective uses. FDOT has stated to us the following: “Unless you are feeding your data into an urban model, use the Seasonal Factors to turn your counts into AADT estimates.” Nonetheless, the traffic data (Raw Turning Movement Counts) was adjusted using the latest FDOT PSCF (2021) as requested in an effort to satisfy the reviewer's concern. See Traffic Study Update. 2) Please use the Multifamily (Mid-Rise) trip generation rates as the proposed building only has 10 total floors, with 8 floors of dwelling units. Response: The ITE trip generation rates for Land Use 221: Multifamily (Mid-Rise) were utilized in the revised trip generation analysis. See Traffic Study Update. 3) Please note that the 11.1% transit mode split adjustment, shown in tables 3 and 4 of the report, includes long-distance train and elevated rail, as specified in the provided census data. The ITE “Close to Transit” rate already accounts for this reduction in vehicular trips. Please either. Please revise the rates to use the “not close to rail transit” rates or remove the rail transit reduction in the “Mode Split Adjustment”. This credit should only be accounted for once. Response: The ITE "Close to Transit" trip generation rate for Multifamily (Mid- Rise) and the latest census data for transportation mode splits (excluding the transit percentages for long-distance rail and elevated rail) was used in the revised analysis. See Traffic Study Update. 4) The intersection of 62nd Avenue and 72nd Street does not have a right-turn overlap phase for the westbound movement. Additionally, the yellow and red times for the eastbound left-turn do not match the provided signal timing sheet. 113 6075 Sunset Drive Traffic Impact Study RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 2 Response: Although the subject intersection does not provides a protected westbound right-turn overlap, it operates with a defacto right-turn overlap as vehicles were making westbound right-turns in concurrently with the protected green arrow for the southbound left-turns. Nonetheless, the westbound right- turn overlap was removed from the intersection capacity/LOS analysis as requested. In addition, we have input the correct yellow and red times for the eastbound left-turn (AM condition since PM was input correctly). Lastly, the revised analysis yielded the same LOS results previously documented and found no material difference in vehicle delays. See Traffic Study Update. 5) The southbound left volume for the PM Existing conditions at the intersection of 62nd Avenue and 72nd Street do not match the volume development sheet. Please address this issue. Response: The inputted southbound left-turn volume was a "typo" (42 vph vs 45 vph) and it was corrected in the revised analysis. Note, no material change was found in the results. See Traffic Study Update. 6) Please include a link analysis for 72nd Street. Analysis should involve a comparison of the peak hour segment traffic volume with the service volume in the FDOT Generalized Service Volume Table for the minimum LOS standard for the facility. Response: As requested, we have prepared a roadway link analysis for SW 72nd Street. The existing roadway volumes were obtained from the Turning Movement Counts (at SW 72nd Street and SW 62nd Avenue) and were evaluated using the FDOT Generalized Service Volume Table 4 (Peak Hour Two-Way). The roadway link analysis yielded LOS D for the existing and future conditions. See Traffic Study Update. 7) Please provide a table that summarizes the 95th percentile vehicle queue for all scenarios of each intersection analyzed at each approach and key turn lanes, as well as the current storage length of each turn lane. Response: Appendix 5 of the Traffic Study Update contains the table summarizing the 95th Percentile Queue results at each intersection. 8) The service driveway doesn’t appear wide enough to accommodate trucks. Provide an auto-turn demonstrating sufficient pavement width and turning radii for the intended loading/unloading and ingress/egress operations is being provided by the site. Trucks should not drive over the sidewalk/curb. Response: The design team for this project will provide the Auto-Turn as part of the re-submittal package. 9) On level 2, plan sheet A2-2, there is a door behind a parking stall. What is the plan for the access of this door? 114 6075 Sunset Drive Traffic Impact Study RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 3 Response: The design team for this project will address this comment. 10) Please provide site distance triangles per City Code of ordinances at all project driveways. It seems that there is on-street parking as well as proposed trees within those triangles. Please address these issues. Response: The design team for this project will address this comment. 11) Please provide a signing and pavement marking sheet prepared by a civil engineer. At a minimum, this sheet must include stop bars and stop signs at all proposed driveways. Response: The design team for this project will address this comment. 12) Several of the directional arrows for traffic are facing the wrong way, please revise these to the correct configuration. Response: The design team for this project will address this comment. 13) Please provide a turn-around area at the end of the dead-end parking aisle in the event that all parking stalls are occupied. Response: The design team for this project will address this comment. 14) Confirm if the tandem parking spaces will be assigned to residents of the same unit or if Valet is being provided to facilitate proper operation of the tandem parking spaces. Response: The tandem parking spaces are for residents of the same unit and no valet services will be provided. 15) Please confirm if 20% of the provided parking spaces are EVSE Ready parking spaces. As shown on the site plan, only 60 spaces are marked as EVSE spaces. With a total of 352 spaces, a minimum of 71 EVSE spaces are required. Sec.20-4.4 City Code of Ordinances. Response: The design team for this project will address this comment. 16) City of South Miami Code of Ordinances Sec. 20-4.4 requires parallel parking spaces to be a minimum of 22’ in length with a 5-foot buffer at each end of a row of parallel parking spaces. Provided parallel parking spaces are shown as 20’ in length and a buffer area is not included. Response: The design team for this project will address this comment. 17) City of South Miami Code of Ordinances Sec. 20-4.4 requires a minimum of 3 loading/unloading spaces for multifamily buildings with more than 200 units. The proposed site plan only includes 2 loading/unloading spaces. Additionally, loading/unloading spaces should be a minimum of 12’ x 35’. Please provide 115 6075 Sunset Drive Traffic Impact Study RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 4 dimensions for the loading/unloading spaces to confirm they meet the minimum size requirements. Response: The design team for this project will address this comment. 18) City of South Miami Code of Ordinance Sec. 20-8.8. Please show on the plans the location of the required number of bicycle spaces as per code (1 per every 15 vehicular parking spaces for residential and 1 up to 20,000 SF of commercial). Response: The design team for this project will address this comment. 19) Advisory comment: City of South Miami Code of Ordinance Sec. 20-8.11. The secure bike room for the bonus floor is to be in addition to the required number of bicycle parking spaces for the proposed uses. Response: The design team for this project will address this comment. 116 6075 Sunset Drive Traffic Impact Study RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 5 Executive Summary This study was prepared to evaluate the traffic impacts associated with the proposed mixed-use development. The analysis documented herewith evaluates the existing traffic condition and proposed future condition with and without project trips during the adjacent roadway's AM and PM peak hour. The subject site is located on the northwest corner of SW 72nd Street (Sunset Drive) and SW 61st Avenue in the City of South Miami, Florida. This site is vacant and in close proximity to the South Miami Metrorail Station. The proposed development consists of multifamily housing with 316 dwelling units and 4,897 square feet of retail. The build-out year for this project is slated for 2024. Moreover, the subject project will have the main driveway on SW 71st Street and a service driveway on SW 61st Avenue. The trip generation analysis was performed consistent with the methodology described in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition while the trip generation characteristics were obtained from ITE’s Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. This analysis was performed for a typical weekday's AM and PM peak hour. The following land uses, as identified by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), most closely resemble the proposed development. These land uses (LU) are as follows: Proposed Uses: LU 221: Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) - 316 Dwelling Units LU 822: Retail (<40k) - 4,897 Square Feet Moreover, the trip generation analysis includes trip reduction factors such as internal capture, pass-by trips and mode split. The internal capture was estimated consistent with the ITE Multi-Use Project Internal Capture methodology while the pass-by trip percentage for the supermarket was obtained from the ITE Trip Generation Handbook. The trip reduction percentages for mode split (i.e. transit, walking and bicycle) were obtained from published census data for the location of the subject project (US Census Bureau, Miami-Dade County tract 76.03). As a result, the trip generation calculations yielded 93 net external trips (53 trips-in & 40 trips-out) during the AM peak hour and 84 net external trips (38 trips-in & 46 trips- out) during the PM peak hour. The peak hour trips were distributed to the studied intersections and assigned to the site's access points consistent with the traffic distribution percentages for the project's Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) 1118 as assigned by the Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) on the Miami-Dade Long Range Transportation Plan (2045 LRTP) Directional Trip Distribution Report, September 2019. 117 6075 Sunset Drive Traffic Impact Study RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 6 Manual Turning Movement Counts (TMC’s) were collected at the intersections identified in Table 1. These counts were performed on Thursday, November 4th, 2021 during the AM peak period (7:00 AM to 9:00 AM) and PM peak period (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM). The traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hour were determined, adjusted for peak seasonal variations by utilizing the Florida Department of Transportation Peak Season Conversion Factor (PSCF) as requested by the City's traffic consultant and utilized in the traffic operational analysis for the existing condition. Note, the appropriate traffic data adjustment is the Seasonal Factor (SF) and not the Peak Season Conversion Factor (PSCF) as indicated by FDOT which is the agency responsible for developing the adjustment factors and their respective uses. FDOT has stated to us the following: “Unless you are feeding your data into an urban model, use the Seasonal Factors to turn your counts into AADT estimates.” Based on historical trends and using traffic data from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT Count Stations 8252 and 8253), a regression analysis was performed in an effort to estimate any potential background traffic. The resulting growth rates yielded 0.40 percent and negative (-) 5.10 percent (decrease in traffic). However, a conservative growth rate of one (1.0) percent was compounded and applied to the existing traffic volumes in order to determine the background traffic for the year 2024 (project build-out year). In addition to background traffic, the analysis for the future conditions includes the committed trips for the Skilled Nursing Facility project located at 7040 SW 61st Avenue. The traffic volumes for the future condition without project in 2024 (No Build) include the existing traffic, background traffic and committed traffic. Similarly, the traffic volumes for the future condition with project (Build) include the existing traffic, background traffic, committed traffic and the project net trips. The resulting future traffic volumes were evaluated for Level of Service. As a result, the analysis yielded LOS A for all the intersections except for SW 72nd Street and SW 62nd Avenue. This intersection will maintain the existing LOS D for the AM and PM peak hour. In addition, the project's driveways were evaluated and resulted in overall LOS A. Table 1 summarizes the LOS results. In conclusion, the subject project will generate 93 and 84 net new trips during the AM and PM peak hour, respectively. The studied intersections and roadways are operating at acceptable LOS D or better and will maintain the existing LOS for the future conditions with the new traffic generated by the subject project. Therefore, sufficient roadway capacity exists to support this project and no off-site improvements are required or recommended since the additional trips added by this project will not increase the LOS beyond the City's acceptable LOS E. 118 6075 Sunset Drive Traffic Impact Study RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 7 LOS Delay (sec) Approach LOS Delay (sec) LOS Delay (sec) Approach LOS Delay (sec) 1 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 59 Place Two-Way Stop A 3.2 SB B 10.7 A 3.8 SB C 15.0 2 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 61 Avenue Two-Way Stop A 0.2 SB B 10.3 A 0.8 SB B 13.3 3 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 62 Avenue Traffic Signal D 51.5 - - - D 52.8 - - - 4 SW 71 Street & SW 59 Place Two-Way Stop A 0.8 EB B 10.7 A 1.0 EB B 12.1 5 SW 71 Street & SW 61 Avenue Two-Way Stop A2.6 WBA8.7A4.2 WBA9.2 LOS Delay (sec) Approach LOS Delay (sec) LOS Delay (sec) Approach LOS Delay (sec) 1 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 59 Place Two-Way Stop A 3.3 SB B 10.9 A 4.0 SB C 15.6 2 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 61 Avenue Two-Way Stop A 0.2 SB B 10.4 A 0.9 SB B 13.8 3 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 62 Avenue Traffic Signal D 52.2 - - - D 53.7 - - - 4 SW 71 Street & SW 59 Place Two-Way Stop A 0.8 EB B 10.8 A 1.0 EB B 12.4 5 SW 71 Street & SW 61 Avenue Two-Way Stop A2.5 WBA8.7A4.0 WBA9.3 LOS Delay (sec) Approach LOS Delay (sec) LOS Delay (sec) Approach LOS Delay (sec) 1 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 59 Place Two-Way Stop A 3.4 SB B 11.0 A 4.0 SB C 15.8 2 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 61 Avenue Two-Way Stop A 0.4 SB B 10.6 A 1.1 SB B 14.2 3 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 62 Avenue Traffic Signal D 52.4 - - - D 53.8 - - - 4 SW 71 Street & SW 59 Place Two-Way Stop A 1.5 EB B 12.9 A 1.6 EB B 13.7 5 SW 71 Street & SW 61 Avenue Two-Way Stop A3.8 WBA9.2A4.8 WBA9.6 6 SW 71 Street & Main Driveway (DW 1)Two-Way Stop A4.4 NBA9.0A4.0 NBA9.1 7 SW 61 Avenue & Service Driveway (DW 2)Two-Way Stop A0.2 WBA8.8A0.2 WBA8.9 Overall Critical Approach TWSC Overall Critical Approach TWSC Location Intersection Control Overall Critical Approach TWSC Overall Critical Approach TWSC Overall Critical Approach TWSC Future Condition with Project AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Future Condition without Project AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Location Intersection Control Location Intersection Control Existing Condition AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Overall Critical Approach TWSC Table 1: Intersection LOS Summary - AM & PM Peak Hour 119 6075 Sunset Drive Traffic Impact Study RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 8 Introduction The purpose of this study is to evaluate the traffic impacts associated with the subject project. The analysis documented herewith evaluates the existing traffic condition and future condition with and without project traffic during the adjacent roadway's AM and PM peak hour. Project Location / Description The subject site is located on the northwest corner of SW 72nd Street (Sunset Drive) and SW 61st Avenue in the City of South Miami, Florida. This site is vacant and in close proximity to the South Miami Metrorail Station. The proposed development consists of multifamily housing with 316 dwelling units and 4,897 square feet of retail. The build-out year for this project is slated for 2024. Moreover, the subject project will have the main driveway on SW 71st Street and a service driveway on SW 61st Avenue. Figure 1 depicts the site’s location map while Figure 2 is the site plan provided for illustrative purposes only. Figure 1: Location Map Project's Location SW 72ND ST SW 5 9 TH PL SW 6 2 ND AVE 120 6075 Sunset Drive Traffic Impact Study RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 9 Figure 2: Site Plan Main Driveway (Access to Parking Garage) Service Driveway 121 6075 Sunset Drive Traffic Impact Study RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 10 Existing Condition This section summarizes the current operational and geometric characteristics at the intersections and roadways within the study area in order to provide a comparison to future conditions. Turning Movement Counts (TMC's) Manual Turning Movement Counts (TMC’s) were collected at the intersections identified below. These counts were performed on Thursday, November 4th, 2021 during the AM peak period (7:00 AM to 9:00 AM) and PM peak period (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM). The traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hour were determined, adjusted for peak seasonal variations by utilizing the Florida Department of Transportation Peak Season Conversion Factor (PSCF) as requested by the City's traffic consultant and utilized in the traffic operational analysis for the existing condition. Note, the appropriate traffic data adjustment is the Seasonal Factor (SF) and not the Peak Season Conversion Factor (PSCF) as indicated by FDOT which is the agency responsible for developing the adjustment factors and their respective uses. FDOT has stated to us the following: “Unless you are feeding your data into an urban model, use the Seasonal Factors to turn your counts into AADT estimates.” Figures 3 and 4 depict the existing seasonally adjusted AM and PM peak hour TMC's, respectively. Appendix 4 contains the raw data and the tables utilized to develop the seasonally adjusted turning movement counts. Traffic counts and operational characteristics were gathered at the following intersections: 1. SW 72nd Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 59th Place (Two-Way Stop) 2. SW 72nd Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 61st Avenue (Two-Way Stop) 3. SW 72nd Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 62nd Avenue (Traffic Signal) 4. SW 71st Street & SW 59th Place (Two-Way Stop) 5. SW 71st Street & SW 61st Avenue (Two-Way Stop) Existing Intersection Capacity / Level of Service (LOS) Analysis The existing traffic volumes shown in Figures 3 and 4 were utilized to perform the intersection capacity and LOS analysis for the existing AM and PM peak hour condition. This analysis follows the latest Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology and was performed consistent with the existing traffic operational characteristics at the time data collection took place (i.e. lane geometry, traffic control, etc). As a result, the studied intersections yielded overall LOS D or better during the AM and PM peak hour. Table 2 summarizes the LOS and vehicle delay results while Appendix 5 contains other outputs such as volume to capacity ratio (V/C) and 95th Percentile Queue. 122 6075 Sunset Drive Traffic Impact Study RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 11 LOS Delay (sec) Approach LOS Delay (sec) LOS Delay (sec) Approach LOS Delay (sec) 1 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 59 Place Two-Way Stop A 3.2 SB B 10.7 A 3.8 SB C 15.0 2 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 61 Avenue Two-Way Stop A 0.2 SB B 10.3 A 0.8 SB B 13.3 3 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 62 Avenue Traffic Signal D51.5 ---D52.8 --- 4 SW 71 Street & SW 59 Place Two-Way Stop A 0.8 EB B 10.7 A 1.0 EB B 12.1 5 SW 71 Street & SW 61 Avenue Two-Way Stop A2.6 WBA8.7A4.2 WBA9.2 Overall Critical Approach TWSCLocationIntersection Control Existing Condition AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Overall Critical Approach TWSC Table 2: Existing Condition LOS & Delay - AM & PM Peak Figure 3: Existing Seasonally Adjusted TMC's - AM Peak Hour 123 6075 Sunset Drive Traffic Impact Study RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 12 Figure 4: Existing Seasonally Adjusted TMC's - PM Peak Hour 124 6075 Sunset Drive Traffic Impact Study RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 13 Project Traffic This section of the report describes the analysis for estimating the trip generation and trip distribution associated with the subject project. Trip Generation The trip generation analysis was performed consistent with the methodology described in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition while the trip generation characteristics were obtained from ITE’s Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. This analysis was performed for a typical weekday's AM and PM peak hour. The following land uses, as identified by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), most closely resemble the proposed development. These land uses (LU) are as follows: Proposed Uses: LU 221: Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) - 316 Dwelling Units LU 822: Retail (<40k) - 4,897 Square Feet Moreover, the trip generation analysis includes trip reduction factors such as internal capture, pass-by trips and mode split. The internal capture was estimated consistent with the ITE Multi-Use Project Internal Capture methodology while the pass-by trip percentage for the supermarket was obtained from the ITE Trip Generation Handbook. The trip reduction percentages for mode split (i.e. transit, walking and bicycle) were obtained from published census data for the location of the subject project (US Census Bureau, Miami-Dade County tract 76.03). As a result, the trip generation calculations yielded 93 net external trips (53 trips-in & 40 trips-out) during the AM peak hour and 84 net external trips (38 trips-in & 46 trips- out) during the PM peak hour. The ITE rates and percentages for the AM and PM peak hour are included in Appendix 1. Tables 3 and 4 summarize the trip generation calculations and results for the AM and PM peak hour, respectively. 125 6075 Sunset Drive Traffic Impact Study RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 14 IN OUT TOTAL 316 D.U. 221 0.32 57 44 101 T=0.31(X)+1.06 55 44 99 4.897 Th.SF. 822 2.36 7 5 12 Ln(T)=0.66Ln(X)+1.84 11 7 18 64 49 113 1.9% 1 1 2 63 48 111 4.5%325 3.7%224 8.4%549 10 8 18 53 40 93 Notes: Sources: ITE Trip Generation, 11th Edition & ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition. Th.SF.= 1,000 Square Feet, D.U. = Dwelling Units Trips utilized in the analysis. 1 Internal Capture was calculated consistent with the ITE methodology. 2 Mode split is the anticipated reduction of trips attributed to alternative transportation modes other than automobiles. Census data was used to determine the mode split trips. Net External Trips (External Trips - Mode Split Trips) Total Mode Split Adjustment Trips 2 Mode Split Adjustment Trips Transit (Public Transportation)of External Trips Proposed Site Gross Trips of External Trips Walking of External Trips Bicycle 1 Multi-Use Development Internal Capture External Trips (Proposed Site Gross Trips - Internal Capture Trips) ITE LU CODE AM PEAK HOUR TRIPSITE TRIP GENERATION RATE / EQUATIONLAND USE (LU) UNITS Proposed Retail (Strip Retail Plaza <40k) Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) (Close to Rail Transit) Not Used. R 2<0.75 Not Used. R 2<0.75 IN OUT TOTAL 316 D.U. 221 0.29 40 52 92 T=0.29(X)-0.09 40 52 92 4.897 Th.SF. 822 6.59 16 16 32 Ln(T)=0.71Ln(X)+2.72 23 23 47 56 68 124 9.5% 5 7 12 51 61 112 4.5%235 3.7%224 8.4%459 81018 34.0% 5 5 10 38 46 84 Notes: Sources: ITE Trip Generation, 11th Edition & ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition. Th.SF.= 1,000 Square Feet, D.U. = Dwelling Units Trips utilized in the analysis. 1 Internal Capture was calculated consistent with the ITE methodology. 2 Mode split is the anticipated reduction of trips attributed to alternative transportation modes other than automobiles. Census data was used to determine the mode split trips. 3 Pass-by percentage was obtained from the ITE Trip Generation Handbook 3rd Edition. LAND USE (LU) UNITS Retail (Strip Retail Plaza <40k) Proposed PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS (Close to Rail Transit) ITE LU CODE ITE TRIP GENERATION RATE / EQUATION of External Trips Total Mode Split Reduction Trips Walking of External Trips of External Trips 3 Pass-By Trips (Retail) Net External Trips (External Trips - Mode Split Trips) 1 Multi-Use Development Internal Capture External Trips (Proposed Site Gross Trips - Internal Capture Trips) 2 Mode Split Adjustment Trips Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) Proposed Site Gross Trips Transit (Public Transportation) Bicycle Not Used. R 2<0.75 Table 3: Trip Generation - AM Peak Hour Table 4: Trip Generation - PM Peak Hour 126 6075 Sunset Drive Traffic Impact Study RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 15 DESIGN YEAR 2015 2045 2024 NNE 20.60 26.00 22.22 ENE 19.00 15.90 18.07 ESE 1.40 1.00 1.28 SSE 1.50 1.50 1.50 SSW 16.10 13.70 15.38 WSW 18.70 16.90 18.16 WNW 8.80 9.90 9.13 NNW 13.90 15.20 14.29 TOTAL 100.00 100.00 100.00 DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES (%) DIRECTION MIAMI-DADE LRTP MODEL YEAR Trip Distribution The subject project is located within the Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) 1118 as assigned by the Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) on the Miami-Dade Long Range Transportation Plan (2045 LRTP) Directional Trip Distribution Report, September 2019. As such, the trip distribution was performed consistent with the trip distribution percentages of TAZ 1118 and by interpolating between the 2015 and 2045 TAZ data for the design year of 2024. Figure 5 depicts the TAZ map while the directional trip distribution percentages are outlined in Table 5. Appendix 2 contains the supporting documentation. Figure 5: TAZ Map Table 5: Directional Trip Distribution Percentages 127 6075 Sunset Drive Traffic Impact Study RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 16 DISTRIBUTION (%) DESIGN YEAR IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL NNE 22.22 ENE 18.07 ESE 1.28 SSE 1.50 SSW 15.38 WSW 18.16 WNW 9.13 NNW 14.29 TOTAL 100.00 100.00% 53 40 93 38 46 84 AM PEAK HOUR TRIPSDISTRIBUTIONDIRECTION DIRECTION 7 11 19 15 34 10 26WEST 27.29% 15 SOUTH EAST NORTH 71719.35% 16.88% 9 36.51% 16 PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS 13 17 30 8917 7815 10 12 22 Trip Assignment The net external trips have been further distributed into the four quadrants: North, South, East and West. Table 6 includes the trip distribution percentages and the corresponding trip assignments for the AM and PM peak hour. Lastly, Figures 6 and 7 depict the net trips assigned to the studied intersections and project's driveways for the AM and PM peak hour, respectively. Table 6: Directional Trip Assignment Figure 6: Site Traffic (Project Net Trips) - AM Peak Hour 128 6075 Sunset Drive Traffic Impact Study RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 17 Figure 7: Site Traffic (Project Net Trips) - PM Peak Hour 129 6075 Sunset Drive Traffic Impact Study RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 18 Proposed Future Condition This section of the report describes the traffic parameters utilized to develop the future peak hour volumes and to evaluate the future condition with and without the project trips. Background Traffic Growth Using historical traffic data from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT Count Stations 8252 and 8253), a regression analysis was performed in an effort to estimate any potential background traffic. The resulting growth rates yielded 0.40 percent and negative (-) 5.10 percent (decrease in traffic). However, a conservative growth rate of one (1.0) percent was compounded and applied to the existing traffic volumes in order to determine the background traffic for the year 2024 (project build-out year). Appendix 3 contains the supporting documentation. Committed Developments In addition to background traffic, the analysis for the future conditions includes the committed trips for the Skilled Nursing Facility project located at 7040 SW 61st Avenue. Appendix 4 contains the supporting documentation. Future Intersection Traffic Volumes - AM & PM Peak Hour The future intersection traffic volumes without project include the existing traffic volumes, background traffic and committed trips. Similarly, the traffic volumes for the future condition with project include the existing traffic, background traffic, committed trips and this project net trips. The resulting future traffic volumes were evaluated for Level of Service. Figures 8 and 9 depict the future traffic volumes with project trips for the AM and PM peak hour, respectively. Appendix 4 contains the calculations for the specific movements while Appendix 5 includes the figures for the proposed future condition without project. Future Intersection Capacity / LOS Analysis As previously mentioned, the future traffic volumes with and without project traffic were evaluated to determine the level of service at the studied intersections. As a result, the analysis yielded LOS A for all the intersections except for SW 72nd Street and SW 62nd Avenue. This intersection will maintain the existing LOS D for the AM and PM peak hour. In addition, the project's driveways were evaluated and resulted in overall LOS A. Table 7 summarizes the LOS results while Appendix 5 includes the Synchro software sheets with other outputs such as the 95th percentile queue lengths and volume to capacity (v/c) ratio. 130 6075 Sunset Drive Traffic Impact Study RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 19 LOS Delay (sec) Approach LOS Delay (sec) LOS Delay (sec) Approach LOS Delay (sec) 1 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 59 Place Two-Way Stop A 3.3 SB B 10.9 A 4.0 SB C 15.6 2 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 61 Avenue Two-Way Stop A 0.2 SB B 10.4 A 0.9 SB B 13.8 3 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 62 Avenue Traffic Signal D 52.2 - - - D 53.7 - - - 4 SW 71 Street & SW 59 Place Two-Way Stop A 0.8 EB B 10.8 A 1.0 EB B 12.4 5 SW 71 Street & SW 61 Avenue Two-Way Stop A2.5 WBA8.7A4.0 WBA9.3 LOS Delay (sec) Approach LOS Delay (sec) LOS Delay (sec) Approach LOS Delay (sec) 1 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 59 Place Two-Way Stop A 3.4 SB B 11.0 A 4.0 SB C 15.8 2 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 61 Avenue Two-Way Stop A 0.4 SB B 10.6 A 1.1 SB B 14.2 3 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 62 Avenue Traffic Signal D 52.4 - - - D 53.8 - - - 4 SW 71 Street & SW 59 Place Two-Way Stop A 1.5 EB B 12.9 A 1.6 EB B 13.7 5 SW 71 Street & SW 61 Avenue Two-Way Stop A3.8 WBA9.2A4.8 WBA9.6 6 SW 71 Street & Main Driveway (DW 1)Two-Way Stop A4.4 NBA9.0A4.0 NBA9.1 7 SW 61 Avenue & Service Driveway (DW 2)Two-Way Stop A0.2 WBA8.8A0.2 WBA8.9 Overall Critical Approach TWSC Overall Critical Approach TWSC Location Intersection Control Overall Critical Approach TWSC Overall Critical Approach TWSC Future Condition with Project AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Future Condition without Project AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Location Intersection Control Table 7: Future Intersection LOS & Delay - AM & PM Peak Hour Figure 8: Future Condition with Project - AM Peak Hour 131 6075 Sunset Drive Traffic Impact Study RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 20 Figure 9: Future Condition with Project - PM Peak Hour 132 6075 Sunset Drive Traffic Impact Study RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 21 AM SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) LOS E / 2,888 VPH County - 4LD 1,291 1,597 D 39 5 30 1,365 1,523 D PM SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) LOS E / 2,888 VPH County - 4LD 1,594 1,294 D 48 11 28 1,681 1,207 D Available Capacity LOSRoadway Location LOS / Volume Standard Existing Two-Way Volume Available Capacity LOS between SW 59 Place & SW 62 Avenue between SW 59 Place & SW 62 Avenue Background Growth @ 1.0% - 3 Year Build-Out (2024) Committed Trips Project Net Trips (2024) Proposed Traffic Volume (2024) CDE 1,245 2,774 2,888 Service Volumes (vph) / LOS SW 72 Street Roadway Link Analysis A roadway analysis was performed to evaluate SW 72nd Street (Sunset Drive) between SW 59th Place and SW 62nd Avenue. SW 72nd Street is a four-lane divided county road providing connectivity in the east-west direction. The existing traffic volumes for this arterial were obtained from TMC data collected at SW 72nd Street and SW 62nd Avenue. The traffic counts were performed on November 4th, 2021. The peak hour volumes were evaluated using the generalized Table 4 of the 2020 FDOT Quality / Level of Service Handbook. As a result, the analysis yielded acceptable LOS D for the existing condition and future condition with project. Therefore, this project meets traffic concurrency and sufficient roadway capacity exists to support the project traffic. Table 8 summarizes the results for the AM and PM peak hour. Appendix 5 contains the supporting documentation. Table 8: Roadway Link Volumes and LOS 133 6075 Sunset Drive Traffic Impact Study RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 22 Conclusion In conclusion, the subject project will generate 93 and 84 net new trips during the AM and PM peak hour, respectively. The studied intersections and roadways are operating at acceptable LOS D or better and will maintain the existing LOS for the future conditions with the new traffic generated by the subject project. Therefore, sufficient roadway capacity exists to support this project and no off-site improvements are required or recommended since the additional trips added by this project will not increase the LOS beyond the City's acceptable LOS E. 134 135 607 5 Sunse t Drive Traffic Im p act Stud y Appendix 1: Trip Generation t~ RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC . Appendix -1 - 136 TAB LE : A1 TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS AM PEAK HOUR Project Name : 6075 Sunset Drive ITE LU ITE TRIP GENERATION LAND USE (LU) UNITS CODE RATE/ EQUATION Proposed Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) 316 D .U. 221 0 .32 (Close to Raif Transit) Not Used. R2 <0 .75 I~ +={hJ-1-fX-)+4--0e Retail (Strip Retail Plaza <40k) 4 .897 Th .SF . I 822 Not Used . R2<0 .75 ~ bR(+) Proposed Site Gross Trips 1 Mufti-Use Development Internal Capture 1.9% External Trips (Proposed Site Gross Trips -Internal Capture Trips) Transit (Public Transportation) 4 .5% of External Trips 2 Mode Split Bicycle 3 .7% of External Trips Adjustment Trips Walking 8.4% of External Trips Total Mode Split Adjustment Trips Net External Trips (External Trips -Mode Spli t Trips ) Notes: Sources : /TE Trip Generation, 11th Edition & /TE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition . Th.SF.= 1,000 Square Feet , D.U. = Dwelling Units Trips ut ili zed in the analysis . 1 Internal Capture was calculated consistent with the ITE methodology . 2.36 G.e ebA(X)+~ .84 % 56% W% 60% eO% 57% 50% 57% 60% 50% 56% 56% 57% AM PEAK HOUR TRIPS IN % OUT 57 44% 44 aa 44% 44 7 40% 5 - 44 4-G¾ 7- 64 43% 49 1 50% 1 63 43% 48 3 40% 2 2 50% 2 5 44% 4 10 44% 8 53 43% 40 2 Mode spl it is the anticipated reduction of trips attributed to alternative transportation modes oth er than automobiles . Census data was used to determine the mode split trips . TOTAL 101 g.g 12 .:i.g 113 2 111 5 4 9 18 93 137 LAND USE (LU) UNITS Proposed Multifamily H ous ing (Mid-Rise) 316 D.U. (Close to Rail Transit) Reta il (Strip Retai l P laza <40k) 4 .897 Th .SF . TA BLE : A2 TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS PM PEAK HOUR Project Na me : 6075 Sunset Drive ITE LU ITE TRIP GENERATION CODE RATE/ EQUATION % 221 0 .29 43 % T=0 .29(X)-0.09 43% 822 6 .59 50% l Not Used. R2 <0 .75 b A(+)-Q.:;q bA(X)+2.72 §0% Proposed Site Gross Trips 45% 1 Multi-Use Development Internal Capture 9. 5% 42% External Trips (Pro posed Site Gross Trip s -In terna l Captu re Trips) 46% Transit (Public Transportation) 4 .5% of External T rips 40% 2 Mode Split IN 40 40 16 2-J 56 5 51 2 Bicycle 3.7 % of External T r ips Adjustment Trips r--------------------------------+------+--- 50% 2 Walking 8.4% of External T r ips Total Mode Split Redu ction Trip s 3 Pass -By Tri ps (Retail) 34. 0% Net External Trips (Ext erna l Trips -Mode Sp li t Trips) Notes : Sources: /TE Trip Gen era tion, 11th Edition & /TE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition. Th.SF .= 1,000 Squa re Feet , D.U. = Dwell ing Un its Trips uti lized in the analys is . 1 In terna l Captu re was ca lculat ed co nsist ent with th e IT E methodology . 44% 4 44% 8 50% 5 45% 38 PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS % OUT 57% 52 57% 52 50% 16 a0% 2-J 55% 68 58% 7 54% 61 60% 3 50 % 2 56% 5 56% 10 50% 5 55% 46 2 Mode split is the anticipa ted reduction of trips attributed to alternativ e transportation modes other th an automobi les . Census data was used to determine the mode sp lit tri ps. J Pa ss -by percentage was obt ained fr om the ITE Tr ip Generat ion Handbook 3rd Edition . TOTAL 92 92 32 47 124 12 112 5 4 9 18 10 84 138 • Multifamily Housing {Mid-Rise) Close to Rail Transit (221) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 7 Avg Num of Dwelling Units 139 Cwect1oral Distriout1on 56% er,tern,g. 44% E:xiting Vehicle Trip Generation rer D·Ncdling Unit 0.32 0.18 • 0.45 0.09 Data Plot and Equation X 80 ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, X ,. _,,_ Ill 60 ,, C: w "' X 0. ~ ~ " I- X 40 20 X 0 0 100 200 X = Numt>er of Dwelling Units X Study Site ---Fitted Curve - - - --Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.31(X) + 1.06 R2 = 0.74 300 General Urban/Suburban and Rural {Land Uses 000-399) 297 ◄ 139 Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) Close to Rail Transit (221) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 7 Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 139 Directional Distribution: 43% entering, 57% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.29 0.16 -0.35 0.05 Data Plot and Equation 80 X X 60 X X "' "C C w "' a. ~ 40 II .... X 20 X 0 0 100 200 X = Number of Dwelling Units X Study Site ---Fitted Curve - - - --Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.29(X) -0.09 R2 = 0.89 298 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 3 300 140II Strip Retail Plaza (<40k) (822) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft GLA On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 5 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA: 18 Directional Distribution: 600/4 entering, 400/4 exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Average Rate 2.36 Data Plot and Equation i w -~ ... II I- 60 60 40 20 X Study Site Range of Rates 1.60 -3.73 X 10 2D X ~ 1000 Sq. Fl GI.A ---Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: ln(T) a 0.68 Ln(XI + 1.84 230 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 5 Standard Deviation , . , :, ,: ,. , : , . 30 , , , , 0.94 - - - --Average Rate R""" 0.57 141 Strip Retail Plaza (<40k) (822) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 25 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GI.A: 21 Directional Distribution: 50% entering. 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 6.59 Data Plot and Equation 300 200 1111) ...... ········· ..... . X ····················· . X , . , . , ., .. X,": ,,' X ; X , 10 X StudySlte ., ., 2.81 -15.20 X .. , ,,, .... ., , X X x: X 20 X X X X c 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA ---Flttod Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(TJ " 0.71 Ln(XI + 2.72 2.94 , , , , , , , , X ,,' X X , X : ,' . :;. ;. ' ..................... . , , , . , . , 30 X X - - - - -Average Rate R'=0.&8 X 40 General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800-999) 231 ... .., 142 190 Table E.9 (Cont'd) Pass-By and Non-Pass-By Trips Weekday, PM Peak Period Land Use Code 820-Shopping Center SIZE NON-f'ASS-aY lRJP (%) ADJ . STREET AVEAAGE. 11 .ooosa. v-.1:EKDAY ND.O F Pl\!IS,8Y P!!AKHDUR 24-HOUR FT. ()LJ.t lOCATlON 61.lRVEY CATE INTlaRI/IEWS TlMEPERIDO TRIP('A) PRIMARY DIVERTED TOTAi. VOLUME TAAFflC SOVRCE 1121 Albany.NY Uy&~ 100 4:IXHl:00 p.m. 23 42 35 n -80.9&l Raymond Koyos 1885 As>OC. 106 Over1rod ~ KS .h'yl!l&! 111 4::J0..5~p.m. 26 81 13 u -~-= - 118 Ovor1and Pon, KS ~1868 12:l 4::J0-5:JO p.m. 25 5S 20 75 --- 2511 Gt"D001 .NY .uta 1BM 120 ◄;00-8:00p.m 38 112 -62 -ZJ.,\O --100 Gtoocc.NY .i.:'la 1988 78 4:00-8.1Xl p.m 29 71 -71 -57.J06 --550 Crooco. NY .uio 1008 117 4:00-6:00p..m. ◄a :12 -52 -40,76::1 --51 Boa, Rolon. Fl Doc. 1007 110 4:~:00p.m . 3J ~ 3:1 67 -◄2.225 KimO)'-liom and Assoc.Inc. 1,090 Ross Twp.Pl\ .My 1888 '11 2:00-6:00 p.m. ~ 56 10 156 -51,500 V\111>14 Smi1h and As>OC. 97 UpparOu~in Vllnlor 1988/89 -4:(X)...C:OOp.m . ◄I 59 -~.000 M<Mohon Twp.PA - --· 118 Trodyf!M T ...... PA Wnfo, 1988189 -4m--6:00 p.m. 2 ◄ -78 -10.000 Boot Alon& -1-'.aml!on 122 LD'W'luldo,NJ Wr:ter 1968188 -4:00-8.1Xl p.m. 37 --63 -20.000 p..,,.,,,i -· 126 8"ca R"10n. FL V\lnlcr 19i181&9 -◄..Dl--4;00 p.m. 43 -57 -40,000 Mi:Menon --150 wro,.,c.wo,PI\ Wn!e, lll8Ml9 -4:00-S:OOp.m. 30 81 26,000 BoazAllon& ---Hamllon 153 ero,.,,,w Cnly .. FL Wn1o<1988/Sll -4:ocHl:00 p.m. 50 -5Q 85,000 MoM&h0n --~" 153 Ardon.DE Wnteir 1588189 -◄:00-e:OO p.m. 30 --70 -26.000 Ort!>-~ & As,oc. Inc. 15◄ Doylos,o,,n. PA Vllnlor 1911a/89 -◄:<X>-e:00 p.rn. 3l --156 -29.000 Ortl>-f!od9or>& As,oc.lrc. I~ M<!d..,_, Wntw108U9 -·~ p.m. 3J 67 25.000 Boa:.A!:lon 6 Twp. PA ---Ham!lon 1156 Hadden T'"!'. NJ Wnta:r 1988199 -◄:00--6 .00p.m. 20 --80 -6.000 Par..t'O"V A>soc:ullos 20S Bro,,,zrdCnty .. FL W nter-l988t80 -◄ :00-6:00 p.rn. 5S --15 62.000 McMahon --A5:;ocia1c, Table E.9 (Cont'd) Pass-By and Non-Pass-By Trips Weekday, PM Peak Period Land Use Code 820-Shopping Center SIZE(t .00'.l VVcEKDAY NO.OF SO.FT Cl.A) LOCATION SURV;YOATE INTERVIEWS 237 W.Wnd,or W.11 10< 1968'119 -Twp. NJ 2•2 WIiow Grovo. 1/w>lor 1!l68m9 -AA. 297 Wl~chllll,F¥. 1Mnt01 1!l681119 - 360 6""""'t!C111y .• '11111101 156M9 -FL 370 Pr.ubutgh. PA W~,:t 19BMl9 - 150 Pcnl<lnd,OR -510 150 Pcft!and .OR -655 700 ~.Al!>ar.a Od.-Oo:. 1967 ,s.ca 178 8onlon1""'1. A;JL 1989 IS◄ HJ 144 Manolapon. NJ July 1!l90 178 S.C9 Nll1kk .MA Fob. 1969 - Average Pass-By Trip Percentage: 34 ·-• means no data were provided Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition .. PA::iS-BY TIMEPERIOO TRJP(%t •OO-C.OO pm ◄8 400-C.OOpm. 37 4:00-C:OOp .m. 3J ◄:00-C.OO p.m 4-1 4:0C>-4:00 p.m. 19 ~:C0-6:00 p.m. 68 •~alp.m. 65 -1.~p.nl. 20 2.·00-a,oo p.m. 35 3 :JCHl:15 p.111. 32 -l :-l&-5:45 p.m. 33 NON-PASS-BY TRIP (%) AO.J STREET AVERAGE PEAK HOUR 2•·HOUR ?RIM.\RV CtVERTEO TOTAL VOLUME TRAFFIC SOURCE --52 --46.CO'.l Boot Allon & Huni!lon --6:l -26.000 McManon MJOdinm --67 -26.000 0nh-Rodgcw~ &As,oc:.lnc, --56 -73,000 McMohon AUCclLlleS --61 -33.000 WiburSmiln B 26 32 -25.000 Kielobonlll\d As>OdcO> 7 2l! 35 -30 .<XIl KiUobon and Asacciatos 39 41 80 --Cl!yof ~OOT --as -37.980 R.tymor,d Ko.,.osA>aoc. 4-1 24 68 -69.~7 ~ Ke-;osAUOC. 26 41 67 -48.782 Raymond K<,yosAs:soc:. itc: 4 143 6/27/22 , 1:52 PM B08301 : MEANS O F TRANSPORTATION TO ... -Census Bureau Table Ille An official webs ite of the United Sta t es governme nt Here's how yo u k now MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION TO WORK Note: This is a modified view of the original table produced by the U.S. Census Bureau . This download or printed version may have missing information from the original table . Label V Total : V Car, truck, or van : Drove alone V Ca rpooled : In 2-person ca rpool In 3-person ca rpool In 4-person ca rpool In 5-or 6-person carpool In 7-or-more-person carpool V Public transportation (e xcluding t ax icab): Bus Subway or eleva t ed rail Long-distance train or commuter rail Light rail, streetcar or trolley (carro publico in Puerto Rico) Ferryboat Ta xicab Motorcycle Bicycle Walked Other means Worked from home Census Tra ct 76.03, Mia mi-Dade County, Florida Estimate 1,389 -967 914 53 24 29 0 0 0 177 12., ~. ---:J> 63 &f . s ~ ...._, No+ useJ 96 (,. 'I Y. -18 \.';:, -. 0 0 0 6 52 "!)., )-: -117 fl.I(/. -0 70 https ://data .cens us.gov/cedsci/table ?text=b08301 &g= 1400000US 12086007603&ti d =ACSDT5Y2020 .B08301 Marg in of Error ±229 ±188 ±196 ±50 ±32 ±35 ±14 ±14 ±14 ±113 ±75 ±61 ±22 ±14 ±14 ±14 ±10 ±42 ±99 ±14 ±74 HL 144 6/27 /22 , 1:52 PM B08301 : MEANS O F TRANSPORTAT ION TO ... -Census Bureau Tab le Table Notes MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION TO WORK Survey/Program: American Community Su rvey Universe: Workers 16 years and over Year : 2020 Estimates : 5--Year Table ID: B08301 Although the American Co mmunity Survey (ACS) produces population, demographic and housing unit estimates, for 2020, the 2020 Census provides the official counts of the population and housing un its for the nation, states, counties, cities, and towns . For 2016 to 2019, the Population Estimates Program provides estimates of the population for the nation, states, counties, cities, and towns and intercensal housing unit estimates for the nation, states, and counties . Source : U.S. Census Bureau , 2016-2020 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates 2019 ACS data products include updates to several categories of the existing means of transportation question . For more information, see : Change to Means of Transportation . Data are base d on a samp le and are subject t o sam p li ng variability. The d egree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here i s the 90 percent margin of error. The marg i n of error can be interpreted roughly as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confi dence bounds) conta ins the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS est imates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see ACS Technical Documentation). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables . Workers include members of the Armed Forces and civilians who were at work last week. The 2016-2020 American Community Survey (ACS) data genera ll y reflect the September 2018 Office of Management and Budget (0MB) delineations of metropolitan an d micropo litan statistica l areas . In certain instances, the names, codes, and boundaries of the principal cities shown in ACS tables may differ from the 0MB delineation lists due to differences in the effective dates of the geographic entities . Estimates of urban and rural populations, hous i ng units, and characteristics reflect boundaries of urban areas defined based on Census 201 O data . As a result, data for urban and rural areas from the ACS do not necessarily reflect the results of ongoi ng urban i zation . Explanation of Symbols : The estimate could not be computed becau se there were an insufficient number of sample observations . For a ratio of median s estimate, one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interva l or highest interval of an open-ended distrib ution . N The estimate or margin of error cannot be displayed because there were an insufficient number of sample cases in the selected geographic area . (X) The estimate or margin of error is not appl icable or not available . median- The median falls in the lowest interval of an o pen-ended distribution (for example "2,500-") median+ The median falls in the highest i nterval of an open-ended distribution (for example '250,000+'). tt The margin of error could not be computed because there were an insufficient number of sample o bservations . -lrlrl< The margin of error could not be computed because the median falls in the lowest interval or highest interval of an open-ended distribution . tt-lrlrl< A margin of error is not appropriate because the corresponding estimate is controlled to an independent population or housing esti mate . Effectively, the corresponding estimate has no sampling error and the margin of error may be treated as zero. Supporting documentatio n on co de lists, su bject definitions, data accuracy, and statistica l testing can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Technica l Documentatio n se ct ion. Sample size and data quality measures (including coverage rates, allocation rates , and response rates) can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Methodology section . https:/ /data .census .gov/cedsci/tab le ?text= b08301 &g= 1400000U S 12086007603&tid=ACS DT5Y2020.B08301 L./L. 145 Project's Census Tract 75 .01 "HST 146 II I Analyst ___ --'Cc.cV ___ _ Date __ J::..:u"'n"'e-"'2"--7:....:, 2::..:0c.::2c::c2 __ LAND USE A Mu lti fam il y H ousing ITE LU Code 221 6075 Sunset Drive MUL T l-USE DEVELOPMENT TRIP GENERATION AND INTERNAL CAPTURE SUMMARY LAND USE B 1 2% 1 1 I w I 14 %I 1 I ITE LU Code Time Pe riod AM Peak Hour Retai l 8 22 S ize 316DU De mand Balanced Demand Size 4 .897 SF Ex it to Ext erna l 44 II ( 56 r Enter fro m Externa l Tota l In ternal External ~ ---Ent er 57 1 56 -- -,-Enter Exit 44 0 44 Exit Total 101 1 100 I 1% I 0 I m I 17 %I 1 I Total % 100% 1% 99% Demand Balance d Demand % Net External Trips for Multi-Use Development ~~~~ Enter 56 Exit 44 Total 100 Sinole-Use Tri p G e n . Est. 101 Sources: Trip Generati on Handbook, 3rd Edit ion Input variables. 7 63 4 48 1 1 111 12 113 Ent er lro m Exte rn al Total Intern al External 1 7 7 0 7 - 5 1 4 ) 12 1 11 11 4 100% 8% 92 % Exit to External INTERNA L CAPTU RE 1.9% I 11 II 147 11 11 An al ys t ____ C_V ___ _ Dat e __ J_u_n_e_2_7~, 2_0_2_2 __ LAND USE A Multif amily Housing ITE LU Code 22 1 6075 Sunset Dri ve MU L T l-USE DEVELO P MENT TRIP GEN E RATION AND INTERNAL CAPTURE SUMMARY LA N D USE B I 46 % 1 18 I w I 26%I 4 I ITE LU Code Ti me Period PM Pe ak Hou r Re ta il 822 Size 316 DU Demand Balanced Demand Size 4 897 SF Exrt lo EX1emal 50 11 < 36 r Enter from External To tal Intern al External .J> ----Ent er 40 4 36 ---En ter Exit 52 2 50 Exit Total 92 6 86 I 42 % I 22 I CD 1 10%1 2 I Total % 100% 6% 94% Dem and Balanced Demand % Net External Trips for Multi-Use Development ~~----~ Enter 36 Exi t 50 Total 86 Single -U se Trip Gen. Est. 92 Sources: Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition Inpu t variabl es. 14 50 12 62 26 11 2 32 124 Enter from External Total Internal Ex ternal II 14 16 2 14 ~ 16 4 12 ~ 32 6 26 II 12 100% 18% 81 % Exit to External INTERNAL CAPTURE 9.5 % I II 11 148 Table 6.1 Unconstrained Internal Person Trip Capture Rates for Trip Origins within a Mixed-Use Development WEEKDAY AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour From OFFICE To Retail 28% 20% To Restaurant 63% 4% To Cinema/Entertainment 0% 00/4 To Residential 1% 2% To Hotel 0% 0% From RETAIL To Office 29% 2% To Restaurant 13% 29% To Cinema/Entertainment 0% 4% To Residential 14% 26% To Hotel 0% 5% From RESTAURANT To Office 31% 3% To Retail 14% 41% To Cinema/Entertainment 0% 8% To Residential 4% 18% To Hotel 3% 7% From To Office 0% 2% CINEMA/ENTERTAINMENT To Retail 0% 21% To Restaurant 0% 31% To Residential 0% 8% To Hotel 0% 2% From RESIDENTIAL To Office 2% 4% To Retail 1% 42% To Restaurant 20% 21% To Cinema/Entertainment 0% 0% To Hotel 0% 3% From HOTEL To Office 75% 0% To Retail 14% 16% To Restaurant 9% 68% To Cinema/Entertainment 0% 0% To Residential 0% 2% Source: Bochner, B., K. Hooper, B. Speny, and R. Dunphy. NCHRP Report 684: Enhancing lntsmal Trip Cspture Estimation for Mixed-Use Developments. Wilshlngton, DC: Transpcttation Research Board, Tables 99 and 100, 2011. Chapter 6: Trip Generation for Mixed-Use Development 67 149 ... .. .. .. Table 6.2 Unconstrained Internal Person Trip Capture Rates • for Trip Destinations within a Mixed-Use Development • \Neekday • AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour To OFFICE From Retail 4% 31% • From Restaurant 14% 30% • From Cinema/Entertainment 0% 6% From Residential 3% 57% • From Hotel 3% 00.4 • To RETAIL From Office 32,0/4 8% From Restaurant 8% 50% • From Cinema/Entertainment 0% 4% .. From Residential 17% 10% • From Hotel 4% 2% To RESTAURANT From Office 23% 2% • From Retail 50% 29% "" From Cinema/Entertainment 0% 3% From Residential 20% 14% • From Hotel 6% 5% .. To From Office 0% 1% CINEMA/ENTERTAINMENT From Retail 0% 26% .. From Restaurant 0% 32% .. From Residential 0% 0% .. From Hotel 0% 00/4 To RESIDENTIAL From Office 0% 4% .. From Retail 2% 46% .. From Restaurant 5% 16% From Cinema/Entertainment 00/4 4% ,. From Hotel 0% 0% • To HOTEL From Office 0% 0% From Retail 0% 17% ~ From Restaurant 4% 71% ~ From Cinema/Entertainment 0% 1% fj From Residential 00/4 12% Source: Bochner, B., K Hooper, B. Sperry, and R. Dunphy. NCHRP Report 684: Enhancing Internal Trip capture 8 Estima6on for Mixed-Use Developments. VVashington, DC: Transportation Research Board, Tables 101 and 102, 2011. 8 8 58 Ttfp Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition ni.:r • r 150 607 5 Sunset Drive Traffic Im p act Stud y Appendix 2: Trip Distribution / Assignment ~~ RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Appendix -2 - 151 ... ::I 0 :c ~ IQ (I) a.. ~ ~ I II) a. ·.::: I--(I) z -(.) (I) ·o ... a.. -(.) :i: IQ ... I- (I) -U) (I) > ·.::: 0 -(I) II) C: ::I (/) It) r-- 0 CD I.!) I.!)....- SW 61 Ave ,;_' ~o ¥"21 ....-- 1526075 Sunset Drive SW 72 St Site Traffic (Project Net Trips) -PM Peak Hour ~ + -'"O .i:,.. 153 DI RE CT ION NNE EN E ESE SSE SSW WSW W NW NN W TOTAL TABL E: A3 Cardinal Distrib ution AM Peak Hou r (Weekday) T raffic Analys is Zone (T AZ) 11 18 Pro ject Name : 60 75 Suns et Drive DISTRIBUTI O N (%) DI RECT ION DISTRIBUTION DESIGN YEAR 22 .22 18 .07 NORT H 3 6 .51% 1 .28 1.50 EAST 19.35 % 15.38 18.16 SOUTH 16 .88% 9 .13 14 .29 WEST 27.29% 10 0.00 100.00 % @) 34 19 15 D0 D 11 < A M PEAK HOUR T RIP S IN OU T TOTAL 19 15 34 10 7 17 9 7 16 15 11 26 53 40 93 10 15 < A M P EAK H O UR 8 N ET TR IP S g 17 e 7 D0 D 7 9 16 @ Note: Di re ction a l perce ntag es ci rcled are rounded . Q 154 DIRECTION NNE ENE ESE SSE SSW WSW WNW NNW TOTAL Note: TA BLE: A3-1 Cardinal Distribution AM Peak Hour (Weekday) Traffic Analysis Zone (T AZ) 1118 Proj ect Name : 6075 Sun set Dr ive DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES(%) MIAMI-DADE LRTP MODEL YEAR DESIGN YEAR IN 2015 2045 2024 20 .60 26 .00 22 .22 12 19.00 15.90 18 .07 9 1.40 1.00 1 .28 1 1 .50 1.50 1.50 1 16.10 13.70 15.38 8 18.70 16 .90 18.16 10 8.80 9.90 9 .13 5 13.90 15.20 14 .29 7 100.00 100 .00 100 .00 53 AM PEAK HOUR TRIPS OUT TOTAL 9 21 7 16 0 1 1 2 6 14 7 17 4 9 6 13 40 93 Based on Miami-Dade Transportation Planning Organization 2045 LRTP Directional Trip Distribut ion Report, September 2019 . Since the current data is only available for the model years 2015 and 2045, the eight (8) cardinal directions were interpolated to the design year of 2024. DIRECTION NNE ENE ESE SSE SSW WSW WNW NNW TOTAL AM PEAK HOUR TRIPS : PERCENT : DISTRIBUT ION % 22.22 18.07 1.28 1.50 15.38 18 .1 6 9.13 14.29 100.00 IN 53 56.99% INGRESS CALCULATED 11.777 9.577 0.678 0.795 8.15 1 9.625 4.839 7.574 53.016 TABLE: A3-2 OUT 40 43.01% USED 12 9 1 1 B 10 5 7 53 TOTAL 93 (Calculated) EGRESS CALCULATED 8.888 7.228 0.512 0.600 6.152 7.264 3.652 5.716 40.012 TOTAL USED 9 21 7 16 0 l 1 2 6 14 7 17 4 9 6 13 40 93 155 DIRECTION NNE ENE ESE SSE SSW WSW WNW NNW TOTAL TABLE: A4 Cardinal Distribution PM Peak Hour (Weekday) Traffic Analysis Zone (T AZ) 1118 Project Name : 6075 Sunset Drive DISTRIBUTION(%) DIRECTION DISTRIBUTION DESIGN YEAR 22.22 18.07 NORTH 36 .51% 1.28 EAST 19.35% 1.50 15 .3 8 18 .16 SOUTH 16.88% 9 .13 14.29 WEST 27.29 % 100.00 100.00% @ 30 13 17 f 0 D 12 ~ IN 13 8 7 10 38 PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS 8 OUT 17 9 8 12 46 TOTAL 30 17 15 22 84 10 < PM PEAK HOUR ~ NET TRIPS g 17 ® 9 D0 t 8 7 15 @ Note: Directional perce ntages circled are roun ded. Q 156 DIRECTION NNE ENE ESE SSE SSW WSW WNW NNW TOTAL Note : TABLE: A4 -1 Cardinal Distribution PM Peak Hour (Weekday) Traffic Analysis Zone (T AZ) 1118 Project Name: 6075 Sunset Drive DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES(%) MIAMI-DADE LRTP MODEL YEAR IN 2015 2045 20.60 26 .00 22 .22 8 19.00 15.90 18.07 7 1.40 1.00 1 .28 1 .50 1.50 1.50 16.10 13.70 15.38 6 18.70 16.90 18.16 7 8 .80 9.90 9.13 3 13.90 15 .20 14.29 5 100.00 100.00 100.00 38 PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS OUT 10 8 7 8 4 7 46 TOTAL 18 15 2 2 13 15 7 12 84 Ba sed on Mia m i-Dade Transportation Pl ann ing Organiza tion 2045 LRT P Direc tional Trip Distribution Report , Septe mber 2019. Since the current data is on ly available for th e model years 201 5 and 2045 . the eight (8) card inal directio ns we re inte rpo lated to the design year of 2024 . DIRECTION NNE ENE ESE SSE SSW WSW WNW NNW TOTAL PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS: PERCENT: DISTRIBUTION% 22.22 18 .07 1.28 1.50 15.38 18.16 9 .13 14.29 100.00 IN 38 45.24% INGRESS CALCULATED 8 .444 6.867 0 .486 0 .570 5.844 6.901 3.469 5.430 38.0 11 TABLE: A4-2 OUT 46 54.76% USED 8 7 1 1 6 7 3 5 38 TOTAL 84 (Calculated) EGRESS CALCULATED 10 .221 8 .312 0 .589 0 .690 7.075 8 .354 4.200 6.573 46 .014 TOTAL USED 10 18 8 15 1 2 1 2 7 13 8 15 4 7 7 12 46 84 157 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONE {TAZ) IUJ"i -1035 •'-'--~ 1022 ·108 ·1004 ·102·1 -i-1·12 ·1 ·1 ·1 ·1 "1"1'10 "1099 ·1023 ·1020 ·10 ·19 -i-113 "' 11·14 '1005 ::, C a, > 1-100 ·1092 ·10·17 -1007 1104 -10-15 -1 ~ ......__ 10 '16 7 ·taos '1014 ·1·128 ( ·10 ·13 "1"127 ·1·13 ·1 ·1009 JC) ·10·10 ·10·1 ·1 1"132 ·1·17 ·1 \ 158 M SUPPORTINCi DOCUMENTS 159 ll.1i.imi-Ddde 2015 8d~~ Ye,H Direction Trip D1stnbuuon Summ;iry ----. . --- T AZ of Orii:in ,: ti , 111 ,, ,I I '" ,., 'I "· • -----T:1 1 c . ... . . _ ---------_ . -------, .'!.,I County Regional I '• 1 , ,,,,; NNE ENE ESE SSE SSW i WSW WNW NNW '"I'' TAZ TAZ . , 1093 3993 Trips 235 91 8 56 150 1 25 230 902 1093 3993 Percent 26 .3 10.2 0.9 6.2 16.8 13.9 25.7 1094 3994 Trips 962 292 53 216 805 633 919 11,008 1094 3994 Percent 24.8 75 1.4 5 .6 20.7 16.3 23.7 1095 3995 Trips 552 475 63 47 175 717 547 774 3,421 1095 3995 Percent 16.5 14 .2 1.9 1.4 5.2 21.4 16.3 23.l 1096 3996 Trips 619 1157 30 32 236 507 325 754 3,106 1096 3996 Percent 20.9 15 .4 1.0 1.1 8.0 17 .1 11.0 25.5 1097 3997 Trips 637 310 121 71 339 935 406 968 3,837 1097 3997 Percent 16.8 8.2 3.2 1.9 8.9 24 .7 10.7 25.6 1098 3998 Ttips 9,391 5,544 1,947 600 4,955 7,929 4,518 7,280 45,582 1098 3998 Percent 22 .3 13 .2 4.6 1.4 11.8 18.8 10.7 17.3 1099 3999 Trips 2,956 2,693 292 216 1,756 1,784 1,309 2.188 13,533 1099 3999 Percent 22.11 20.4 2.2 1.6 13.3 13.5 9.9 16.6 1100 4000 Trips 1,099 443 22 29 310 752 404 722 3,844 1100 4000 Percent 29.l 11.7 0.6 0.8 8.2 19.9 10.7 19.1 1101 4001 Trips 161 31 4 8 20 100 64 70 458 1101 4001 Percent 35.l 6.8 0.9 1.8 4.4 21 .8 14.1 15.2 U02 4002 Trips 145 31 4 2 34 101 98 106 526 1102 4002 Percent 27.8 6.0 0.8 0.4 6.5 19.4 18.8 20.4 1103 4003 Trips 3,4117 1,241 118 265 1,208 2,801 1,081 1,661 12,545 1103 4003 Percent 29.2 10.5 1.0 2.2 10.2 23.7 9.2 14.l 1104 4004 Trips 421 100 9 27 89 321 144 296 1,439 1104 4004 Percent 29.9 7.1 0.6 1.9 6.3 22.8 10.2 21.0 1105 4005 Trips 1,731 560 107 103 386 1,240 606 937 5,958 1105 4005 Percent 30.5 9.9 1.9 1.8 6.8 21.9 10.7 16.5 1106 4006 Trips 857 846 84 85 543 739 405 475 4,116 1106 4006 Percent 21 .2 21 .0 2.1 2.1 13.5 18.3 10.0 11.8 1107 4007 Trips 2,217 1,562 115 374 1,359 1,621 1,205 1,243 10,464 1107 4007 Percent 22.9 16.l 1.2 3.9 14.0 16.7 12.4 12.8 1108 4008 Trips 622 407 42 109 378 385 219 293 2,533 1108 4008 Percent 25.3 16.6 1.7 4.4 15.4 15.7 8.9 12.0 1109 4009 Trips 233 191 43 27 198 160 168 209 1,245 1109 4009 Percent 19.0 15.S 3.5 2.2 16.1 13.0 13.7 17 .0 1110 4010 Trip s 473 273 101 65 279 208 149 282 1,847 1110 4010 Percent 25.8 14.9 5.5 3.6 15.2 11 .4 8.1 15.4 1111 4011 Trips 418 544 83 202 411 343 308 549 2,931 1111 4011 Percent 14 .6 19.0 2.9 7.1 14.4 12.0 10.8 19.2 1112 4012 Trips 327 445 148 133 426 245 225 474 2,475 1112 4012 Percent 13.5 18.4 6.1 5.5 17.6 10.1 9.3 19.6 1113 4013 Trips 180 267 64 75 215 111 127 210 1,256 1113 4013 Percent 14.S 21.4 5.1 6.0 17.3 8.9 10.2 16.8 1114 4014 Trip s 228 201 48 96 127 1111 148 219 1.208 1114 4014 Percent 18.8 16 .7 4.0 8.0 10.5 11.7 12.2 18.1 1115 4015 Trips 353 276 115 so 353 299 205 304 2,057 1115 4015 Percent l7.7 13 .9 5.8 4.5 17.7 15.0 10.3 15.2 1116 4016 Trips 209 181 86 62 143 132 90 237 1,141 1116 4016 Percent 18.4 15.9 7.6 5.4 12.5 11.6 7.9 20.8 1117 4017 Trips 504 384 184 139 406 340 210 460 2,683 1118 4018 Trips 1,181 1,089 79 88 922 1,071 503 796 5,919 1118 4018 Percent 20.6 19.0 1.4 1.5 16.l 18.7 8 .8 13.9 160 M1am1 -0ade 2045 Cost Feasible Plan D1rect1on Trip Distribution Summary . -' TAZofOngm t·,,,.111,,,1,,,.,1, .. ,, . , I---• r, _. __________ . . ----1 11 .,11 count r·, ·,. , ,.d , Y · •· ·•1 ,,. • H" L 'L ··, ,.,.. ,.,.,., , ....... , ... ,... T,11,c TAZ \ i ,,: , ' ,r ·< c -'L 1 • • c ·· ·' · • ,, • i "' "• \ '· ·.. , 1093 3993 Tr ips 291 64 6 50 148 167 321 1,083 1093 3993 Percent 27.8 6.1 0.6 4,8 14.1 16.0 30.7 1094 3994 Trips 1,367 543 68 268 962 805 1,204 5,372 1094 3994 Percent 26 .2 10.4 1.3 5.1 18.4 15.4 23.l 1095 3995 Tri ps 1,082 717 48 55 296 904 880 1,086 5,182 1095 3995 Percent 21.4 14 .2 0.9 1.1 5.8 17.8 17 .4 21.4 1096 3996 Trips 866 480 30 56 323 566 508 1,083 4,060 1096 3996 Percent 22.l 12 .3 0.8 1.4 8.3 14.5 13.0 27.7 1097 3997 Trips 1,262 655 234 122 580 1,241 721 1.578 6,528 1097 3997 Pe rce nt 19,7 10.3 3.7 1.9 9.1 19.4 11.3 24.7 1098 3998 Trips 12,77 3 6,565 2,298 541 7,488 10,015 5,563 10,195 60,915 1098 3998 Percent 23 .0 11.B 4.1 l.O l3.S 18,1 10.0 18.4 1099 3999 Trips 4,171 2,92 3 422 237 2,436 2,469 1,688 2,789 17,560 1099 3999 Percent 24.3 17.1 2.5 1.4 14.2 14.4 9 .9 16.3 1100 4000 Trips 1,663 556 24 23 481 838 549 980 5,267 1100 4000 Percent 32 .5 10.9 0.5 0.5 9.4 16.4 10.7 19.2 1101 4001 Trips 193 30 0 0 35 56 112 71 504 1101 4001 Percent 38.9 6.l 0.0 0,0 7.0 11 .3 22 .5 14.2 1102 4002 Trips 202 35 8 14 29 135 111 136 670 1102 4002 Percent 30.2 5.2 1.2 2.1 4,3 20 .1 16.5 20.4 1103 4003 Trips 4.463 1,680 170 182 1,618 3,261 1,505 2,096 16,096 1103 4003 Pe rcent 29 .8 11.2 1.1 1.2 10.8 21.8 10.1 14.0 1104 4004 Tr ips 657 14 8 15 12 188 398 247 439 2,136 1104 4004 Percent 31.2 7.0 0.7 0.6 9.0 18.9 11.7 20 .8 1105 4005 Trips 2,356 776 77 96 627 1,484 785 1,229 7,728 110S 4005 Percent 31.7 10.4 1.0 1.3 8.4 20 .0 10.6 16.5 1106 4006 Trips 1,426 1,084 109 84 681 1,141 611 858 6,188 1106 4006 Percent 23.8 18 .l 1.8 1,4 11.4 19.0 10.2 14 .3 1107 4007 Trips 3,002 2,105 136 359 2,022 1,932 1,593 1,747 13,994 1107 4007 Percent 23.3 16.3 1.1 2.8 15 .7 15 .0 12.4 13.6 1108 4008 Trips 832 569 32 102 405 478 306 346 3,235 1108 4008 Percent 27.l 18 .5 1.1 3.3 13.2 15.G 10.0 11.3 1109 4009 Tri ps 249 272 65 23 205 160 194 193 1,369 11 09 4009 Percent 18 .3 20.0 4.8 1.7 15 .0 11.8 14 .3 14.2 1110 4010 Trips 643 577 97 60 424 287 297 455 2,89 8 1110 4010 Percent 22 .6 20.3 3 .4 2.1 14.9 10.1 10.5 16.0 1111 4011 Tri ps 614 747 89 190 506 492 416 539 3,703 1111 4011 Percent 17 .1 20 .8 2.5 5.3 14 .1 13 .7 11.6 15 .0 1112 4012 Tr ips 432 546 102 118 454 290 317 485 2,804 11 12 4012 Percent 15 .7 19.9 3.7 4.3 16.6 10.6 11.S 17.7 1113 4013 Trips 228 343 61 50 200 120 208 195 1,429 1113 4013 Percent 16.2 24.4 4.3 3.6 14.2 8.5 14 .8 13.9 1114 4014 Trips 261 302 62 72 198 181 215 273 1,595 1114 4014 Pe rcent 16 .7 19 .3 3.9 4.6 12.7 11.6 13 .8 17.5 1115 4015 Trips 462 377 95 54 352 286 276 365 2,295 1115 4015 Percent 20.4 16.7 4 .2 2.4 15.5 12 .6 12 .2 16.1 1116 4016 Trips 233 236 36 92 183 212 138 2SO 1,460 1116 4016 Percent 16,4 16.6 2.6 6.5 12.9 14.9 9,7 20.4 1117 401 7 Trips 801 582 163 180 650 521 368 746 4,078 1117 401 7 Percent 20.0 14.5 4.1 4.5 16.2 13.0 9.2 18.6 1118 4018 Tr ips 2,239 1,370 88 125 1,181 1,456 854 1,307 9,068 1118 4018 Pe rcent 26.0 15 .9 1.0 1.5 13 .7 16.9 9.9 15.2 I -• 161 6075 Sunse t Drive Tra ffic Impact Stu dy Appendix 3: Signal Timing , Background Growth and Adjustment Factor ~ RICHARDGARCIA&ASSOCIATES, INC. Appendix -3 - 162 RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. MIAMI-DADE ATMS SIGNAL DATA SHEET Signal Asset ID: ~ 3 Signal Location: Svi'!54.--\-b'("" ~ ~\J.) (o 2 Av Analysis Period: @ I PM (Circle One) Local Time of Day Schedule: _Jj_ Plan Local Time of Day Function: _-_ Setting (Blank or Number#) Signal Settings: (i.e. Blank, Plan #1 -Phase Bank 1, Max 1) Cycle Length: Offset: PHASE: WALK DON'TWALK MIN INITIAL VEH EXT GREEN YELLOW RED SPLIT seconds seconds ct> 1 <1>2 Jr < ➔ ~,wa ~&r c,c1B .. 0 7 0 ( 9 s 7 2,.r, /Z.. 1 3r //o l?iJ / f 08 ;."{ l( -;.s ; 2.-1 '3 31-q /It,. I 11.>1/ llS" <1>3 ~~ 0 0 s 2 \ '!, i .7 2 -1 lC\.L.f cI:>4 tt 5 l °' l 3 .c; "< , 4 2-~ '11 -~ 163 RlCHARD GARCI A & A SSOCIATES, INC. MIAMI-DADE ATMS SIGNAL DATA SHEET Signal Asset ID: ~00~ Signal Location: ~~ 't><" h ';)UJ lo 1 A/ Analysis Period: AM/ (jj. (Circle One) Local Time of Day Schedule: ~ Plan Local Time of Day Function: ---=-Setting (Blank or Number#) -Signal Settings: (i.e. Blank, Plan #1 -Phase Bank 1, Max 1) Cycle Length: Offset: PHASE: WALK DON'TWALK MIN INITIAL VEH EXT GREEN YELLOW RED SPLIT 2,UJ .1f I,'-( <Dl ..J',{" seconds seconds t&/w~ 0 0 '5 2. l, /2.. ct>2 "-- ➔ ~IW,3 1 l °l 7 l \ lo I 1lA / f?.,,~ ~-Lf l-f ';.5" /2 -1 ~ 22 .q / 21.. I ,~;; t~l. , (!)3 ~ 41 0 0 s 2- Ho ~-7 1 ., 12 .1-1 <D4 it ':> l C\ 7 ~ .':) ~c, L1 2 .q Lf l -" 164 Print Date: 10/4/2021 .Amt lmenenlqg 3003 Sunsat Dr&SW 62 Av .lJU. .m1 lH.1 Dli EBL WBT SBL NBT 0 0 0 0 11.ftll.,.. Ph-a llAnll: PhasaBank 1 El1III. Jrl.AJl Dmllrilli PhaaeBank I 2 3 I 2 3 1 EBL 0 -0 -0 0 - 0 - 0 2 WBT 7 -7 • 7 1D • 19 • 19 3 SBL 0 -0 -0 0 - 0 - 0 4 NBT 5 -5 -5 19 • 19 • 19 5 WBL 0 . 0 -0 0 • 0 - 0 6 EBT 7 -7-7 19 • 19 • 19 7 NBL 0 . 0 -0 0 • 0 - 0 8 SBT 5 -5-5 19 -19 -19 TOD Schedule Report for 3003: Sunset Dr&SW 62 Av :a:m.. .lidu:llllJ&. QpMmtc lllDJL Qm DOW-2 TOD NIA 0 IDllll... .till fJli fill. .till WBL EBT NSL SBT 0 0 0 0 MID IDlll11I ~ M1111Jmll .MB.3. .Illla Bill. I 2 3 I 2 3 I 2 3 I 2 3 5 -5 -5 2.8 -2.5 • 2.5 8 -8 -8 32-30-"" 'IA 3.5 7 -7 -7 1 - 1 -1 25.25.25 0 • 30-30 4 3 5 -5 -5 2 • 2 • 2 5 -8 -8 20 -15 -15 3.7 2.7 7 -7 -7 3.5 -2.5 -2.5 12. ,n. 20 144 • 29. 29 4 2.9 5 -5 -5 2 - 2 . 2 5 • 12 -12 17 • 15 • 15 3..4 2.7 7 • 7 • 7 1 - 1 -1 25-25-25 0.30.30 4 3 5 - 5 - 5 2 • 2 - 2 5 -8 -8 20 -15. 15 3..7 2.7 15 -7 • 7 3.5 -2.5 -2.5 12. 20 • 20 44-29-29 4 2.9 Page 1 ol3 llU2.. .wrm ~ 0 NIA Print Time: 3:57PM AdlrL .6clm.. ,,,,,.uk l\1DIID!Prn 0 MaxO Lael In San/Ice Date: unknown Permllted Phases Default Extamal Pennlt O Extamal Pennil 1 External Pennit 2 12345878 12345678 12-4-6-8 1234-878 12-4-6-8 165 Pri nt Dato : 10/412021 ~ TOD Schedule Curronl Time of Day Function Il!li .E.l!n.&.ll.2n. 0000 TOD OUTPUTS 0625 TOD OUTPUTS 09 30 TOD OUTPUTS S!!!IIDQli • -- ---- TOD Schedule Report for 3003: Sunset Dr&SW 62 Av .Gtll.llll.IIIDll Local Time of Day Function D;iJI of Week IlmJ:. function S!!!tlngi; • SuMTWThF S 0000 TOD OUTPU TS -- MTWThF 0625 TOD OUTPUTS -- MTWThF 09]0 TOD OUTPUTS --- Page 2 of 3 Print Time: 3:57 PM Local TOD Schedule IlmJ:. .e.l.i!n. DOW 0000 Free MTWThF 0000 13 Su s 0100 Free Su s 0130 Free MTWThF 0200 Free Su s 0530 10 M TW Th F 0600 17 M TW Th F 0630 11 Su s .. 0700 -18 N-t MTWThF 1000 23 MTWThF 1000 21 Su s 1100 20 M TW Th F 1500 6 M TW Th F • 1600 -8 p,-, M TW ThF 1900 19 M TW Th F 2000 2 MTWTh 2000 3 Su s 2000 4 F 2200 7 MTWTh 2300 13 MTWTh • Settings Dall of WO!!!! Blank -FREE -Phase Bank 1. Max 1 SuM TW ThF S Blank• Plan -Phase Bank 1, Max 2 MTWThF 1 -Phase Bank 2, Max 1 MTWThF 2 -Phase Bank 2, Max 2 3 -Phase Bank 3, Max 1 4 -Phase Bank 3, Max 2 5 -EXTERNAL PERMIT 1 6 -EXTERNAL PERMIT 2 7 -X-PED OMIT 8-TBA 166 Pr int Dote: 10/412 02 1 No Ca lendar D enned/Enabl ed TOD Schedule Report for 30 03 : Suns et Dr &SW 62 Av Page 3 of 3 Print Time: 3:57 PM 167 -;; (tJ 0 cii Cl> (J J:: Cl> c:. (J :i: (tJ L.. I- ~ (tJ 0 Cl> Ol (tJ L.. Cl> > <( FI N# T raffic Trends -V03 .a SW 59 PLACE --100' SOUTH OF SW 7 1 S T REET 1234 Locatio n 1 10000 9000 - I c:::=::i Obse rved Count -~ -Fitt ed Curve - 8000 ------7000 ~ 6000 I 5000 - 4000 - 3000 2000 - 10 00 - 0 2012 2017 202 2 20 27 Year ... Annu al Trend Increase : 7 Trend R-squared : 0.12% Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate : 0.00% Tre nd Growt h Rate (2021 to Design Year): 0.43 % Printed : 27-Ju n-22 Straight Line Growth Option Cou n ty : Miam i-Dade (8 7) Sta tio n#: 82 52 High w ay: SW 59 PLACE Year I 20 12 77 00 2013 74 00 77 00 201 4 7400 77 00 2015 7300 77 00 2016 7200 77 00 201 7 8600 77 00 20 18 77 00 77 00 201 9 7600 77 00 2020 6800 7700 202 1 8600 77 00 20 32 * Axle -Ad just ed 168FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS OFFICE 2021 HISTORICAL AADT REPORT COUNTY: 87 -MIAMI-DADE SITE: 8252 -SW 59TH PLACE, 100' SOUTH OF SW 71 STREET YEAR 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 AADT DIRECTION 1 DIRECTION 2 *K FACTOR D FACTOR T FACTOR -----------------------------------------------------------8600 C N 5400 s 3200 9.00 55.00 3.50 6800 T N 4200 s 2600 9.00 56.00 2.40 7600 S N 4700 s 2900 9.00 56.00 2.90 7700 F N 4800 s 2900 9.00 54.30 2.90 8600 C N 5400 s 3200 9.00 59.30 2.70 7200 T N 4400 s 2800 9.00 56.10 3.30 7300 S N 4500 s 2800 9.00 57.40 5.30 7400 F N 4600 s 2800 9.00 59.30 1.80 7400 C N 4600 s 2800 9.00 58.90 1.80 8400 C N 5500 s 2900 9.00 59.70 1. 80 8300 C N 5500 s 2800 9.00 58.20 14.70 AADT FLAGS: C = COMPUTED; E = MANUAL ESTIMATE; F = FIRST YEAR ESTIMATE S = SECOND YEAR ESTIMATE; T = THIRD YEAR ESTIMATE; R = FOURTH YEAR ESTIMATE V = FIFTH YEAR ESTIMATE; 6 = SIXTH YEAR ESTIMATE; X = UNKNOWN *K FACTOR: STARTING WITH YEAR 2011 IS STANDARDK, PRIOR YEARS ARE K30 VALUES 169 ->, Ill 0 en Q) ~ .c Q) G (..) :E Ill ... I- ~ -~ 0 Q) Cl Ill ... Q) > <{ Traffic Trends -V03.a SW 70 STREET --100' EAST OF COMMERCE County : FIN# 1234 Station#: Locat ion 1 Highway: 14000 -,-----------------------------, 12000 10000 8000 6000 - 4000 2000 i==:i Observed Co un t -Fi tt ed Cu rv e 0 -+'---41----'+L--4''---'-l..___._...._ ............... _ ........ +--+---+--+---+----l-+---+--+--+---+-+--+---+----, 2012 2017 2022 2027 2032 Year Trend R-squared: 68 .07 % Compounded Annual Historic Growth Rate: -8 .30 % Compounded Growth Rate (2021 to Design Year): -5 .10 % Printed: 27 -Jun -22 Decaying Exponential Growth Option Miam i-Dade (87 ) 8253 SW70 ST REET Traffic ( Year Count* 2012 10300 12000 20 13 10100 10000 20 14 10100 8900 20 15 10000 8100 20 16 9800 7400 20 17 5900 6900 2018 5300 6500 2019 5300 6100 2020 4700 5800 2021 5600 5500 *Axle-Adjusted 170FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS OFFICE 2021 HISTORICAL AADT REPORT COUNTY: 87 -MIAMI-DADE SITE: 8253 -SW 70TH ST, 100' EAST OF COMMERCE YEAR 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 AADT DIRECTION 1 DIRECTION 2 *K FACTOR D FACTOR T FACTOR -----------------------------------------------------------5600 C E 2600 w 3000 9.00 55.00 3.50 4700 T E 2400 w 2300 9.00 56.00 2.40 5300 s E 2700 w 2600 9.00 56.00 2.90 5300 F E 2700 w 2600 9.00 54.30 2.90 5900 C E 3000 w 2900 9.00 59.30 2.70 9800 T E 5900 w 3900 9.00 56.10 3.30 10000 S E 6000 w 4000 9.00 57.40 5.30 10100 F E 6100 w 4000 9.00 59.30 7.50 10100 C E 6100 w 4000 9.00 58.90 16.20 10300 F E 7500 w 2800 9.00 59.70 16.00 10200 C E 7400 w 2800 9.00 58.20 14.70 AADT FLAGS: C = COMPUTED; E = MANUAL ESTIMATE; F = FIRST YEAR ESTIMATE S = SECOND YEAR ESTIMATE; T = THIRD YEAR ESTIMATE; R = FOURTH YEAR ESTIMATE V = FIFTH YEAR ESTIMATE; 6 = SIXTH YEAR ESTIMATE; X = UNKNOWN *K FACTOR: STARTING WITH YEAR 2011 IS STANDARDK, PRIOR YEARS ARE K30 VALUES 171 2021 PEAK SEASON FACTOR CATEGORY REPORT -REPORT TYPE: ALL CA T EGORY: 8701 MIAMI-DADE SOU TH WEEK DATES SF MOCF: 0.92 PSCF 1 01/01/2021 -01/02/2021 0.90 0.98 2 01 /03/2021 -01 /09/2021 1.07 1.16 3 01/10/2021 -01/16/2021 1 .24 1.35 4 01/17/2021 -01/23/2021 1 .22 1.33 5 01/24/2021 -01 /30/2021 1 .19 1 .29 6 01 /31/2021 -02/06/2021 1 .17 1 .2 7 7 02/07/2021 -02/13/2021 1.15 1.25 8 02/14/2021 -02/20/2021 1 .13 1.23 9 02/21/2021 -02/27/2021 1.11 1.21 10 02/28/2021 -03 /06/2 021 1 .09 1 .18 11 03/07/2021 -03/13/2 021 1 .07 1 .16 12 03/14/2021 -03/20/2021 1.05 1 .14 13 03/21/2021 -03/27/2021 1.06 1.15 14 03/28/2021 -04/03/2021 1 .07 1.16 15 04/04/2021 -04/10/2021 1 .09 1.18 16 04/11/2021 -04/17/2021 1 .10 1.20 17 04/18/2021 -04/24/2021 1 .08 1.17 18 04/2 5 /2021 -05/01/2021 1.07 1.16 19 05/02/2021 -05/08/2021 1.06 1.15 20 05/09/2021 -05/15/2021 1 .05 1.14 21 05/16/2021 -05/22/2021 1 .05 1.14 22 05/23/2021 -05/29/2021 1 .05 1.14 23 05/30/2021 -06/05/2021 1.05 1.14 24 06/06/2021 -06/12/2021 1 .05 1.14 25 06/13/2021 -06/19/2021 1.05 1.14 26 06/20/2021 -06/26/2021 1 .04 1.13 27 06/27/2021 -07/03/2021 1.04 1.13 28 07/04/2021 -07/10/2021 1 .03 1 .12 29 0 7 /11/2021 -07/17/2021 1.02 1.11 30 07/18/2021 -07/24/2021 1 .01 1.10 31 07/25/2 0 21 -07/31/202 1 1.00 1.09 32 08/01 /2021 -08/07/2021 0.99 1.08 33 08/08/2021 -08/14/2021 0.98 1.07 34 08/15/2021 -08/21/2021 0.97 1 .05 35 08/22/2021 -08/28/2021 0.97 1.05 36 08/29/2021 -09/04/2 0 21 0 .9 7 1.05 37 09/0 5 /2021 -09/11/2021 0.97 1 .05 38 09/12/2021 -09 /18/2 021 0.97 1.05 *39 09/19/2021 -09 /25/2 021 0 .95 1 .03 *40 09/26/2021 -10/02/2021 0 .94 1.02 *41 10/03/2021 -10/09/2021 0 .92 1.00 *42 10/10/2021 -10/16/2021 0 .91 0.99 *43 10/17/2021 -10/23/2021 0.91 0.99 ,...*-4=--A=-----=l:..:0:...L...:a2'--'4~2"""0'""'2""1~---=l =0-<-,=3=0--,.=.2=0=2 =1 --"'--0 .,_. 9""'2=--------=l:...,•:..o0'-"0:........., f)(::C, ~ *45 10 31 2021 -11 06 2021 0.92 1 .00 \-7 *46 11/07 /2021 -11/13/2021 0.92 1.00 *47 11/14/2021 -11/20/2021 0.92 1.00 *48 11/21/2021 -11/27/2021 0.92 1.00 *49 11/28/2021 -12/04/2021 0.91 0.99 *50 12/05/2021 -12/11/2021 0.91 0.99 *51 12/12/2021 -12/18/2021 0.90 0.98 52 12/19/2021 -12/25/2021 1.07 1.16 53 12/26/2021 -12/31/2021 1.24 1.35 * PEAK SEASON 08-MAR-2022 12:36:28 830UPD 6 8701 PKSEASON.TXT -- 172 6075 Sun se t Dr iv e Tra ff ic Im p a ct Stu d y Appendix 4: Traffic Counts {TMC's) & Committed Development ~~~ RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. A p pen d ix -4 - 173 TABLE:AS INTERSECTION APPROACH VOLUMES -AM PEAK Project Name: 6075 Sunset Drive z 1 2 3 4 5 8 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 0 i= AM PEAK BACKGROUND PROPOSED SITE PROPOSED 0. AM PEAK DATE TRAFFIC GROWTH FUTURE TRAFFIC WO INTERSECTION SEASONALLY COMMITTED FUTURE TRAFFIC ~z NAME APPROACH MOVEMENT HOUR OF PHF PSCF ADJUSTED @1.0%FOR TRIPS TRAFFICW/O (PROJECT WI PROJECT ~ COUNT COUNT (EXISTING) ESTIMATING 2024 PROJECT NET TRIPS) (VPH) (2024) VOLUMES (2024) (VPH) SBR 120 1.00 120 4 0 124 1 125 SOUTHBOUND SBT 0 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBL 0 N 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 120 0 120 4 0 124 1 125 WBR 51 N 1.00 51 2 0 53 8 61 WESTBOUND WBT 395 3 1.00 395 12 2 409 7 416 SW72Street WBL 0 1i 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 446 I .... 446 14 2 462 15 477 1 (Sunset Drive) & NBR 0 Q 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW59Place C) NBT 0 z 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND NBL 0 i!f 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 i::, 0 0 0 0 0 0 I!! EBR 0 :::, 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 432 f= 1.00 432 13 0 445 0 445 EASTBOUND EBL 301 1.00 301 9 0 310 13 323 TOTAL 733 733 22 0 756 13 768 TOTAL 1299 1299 39 2 1340 29 1369 SBR 27 1.00 27 1 3 31 16 47 SOUTHBOUND SBT 0 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBL 0 ... 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 27 N 27 1 3 31 16 47 0 WBR 23 N 1.00 23 1 0 24 7 31 -.f WESTBOUND WBT 496 0 1.00 496 15 2 513 1 514 WBL 0 Iii 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW72 Street .0 TOTAL 519 E "' 519 16 2 537 8 545 2 (Sunset Drive) & NBR 0 ~ Q 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW61 Avenue C) NBT 0 z 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND NBL 0 i!f 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 i::, 0 0 0 0 0 0 I'! EBR 0 :::, 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 .c EBT 740 I-1.00 740 22 0 762 13 775 EASTBOUND EBL 0 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 740 740 22 0 762 13 775 TOTAL 1.286 1286 39 5 1330 37 1367 ©Richard Garcia and Associates, Inc., 2008 6/27/2022 174 TABLE:A& INTERSECTION APPROACH VOLUMES -AM PEAK Project Name: 6075 Sunset Drive z 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 8 10 11 12 13 0 i= AM PEAK BACKGROUND PROPOSED SITE PROPOSED u AM PEAK DATE TRAFFIC GROWTH FUTURE TRAFFIC WO INTERSECTION SEASONALLY COMMITTED FUTURE TRAFFIC ~z NAME APPROACH MOVEMENT HOUR OF PHF PSCF ADJUSTED @1.0% FOR TRIPS TRAFFICW/O (PROJECT W/PROJECT w COUNT COUNT ESTIMATING 2024 PROJECT NET TRIPS) I-(EXISTING) (VPH) (2024) ~ VOLUMES (2024) (VPH) SBR 108 1.00 108 3 0 111 0 111 SOUTHBOUND SBT 225 1.00 225 7 0 232 0 232 SBL 38 1.00 38 1 0 39 0 39 TOTAL 371 371 11 0 382 0 382 WBR 45 1'i 1.00 45 1 0 46 0 46 0 WBT 383 N 1.00 383 12 2 397 11 408 WESTBOUND WBL 88 -.i 1.00 88 3 1 92 6 98 0 SW72 Street WBU 6 2i 1.00 6 0 0 6 0 6 TOTAL 522 E C') 522 16 3 541 17 558 3 (Sunset Drive) & NBR QI ;;; 17 0 4 22 17 > 0 1.00 1 18 SW62Avenue 0 NBT 176 z 1.00 176 5 2 183 4 187 NORTHBOUND NBL 116 i 1.00 116 4 0 120 0 120 TOTAL 309 ,, 309 9 2 320 8 328 I!? EBR 159 :::, 1.00 159 5 0 164 0 164 EBT 708 f. 1.00 708 21 0 729 9 738 EASTBOUND EBL 236 1.00 236 7 4 247 6 253 EBU 14 1.00 14 0 0 14 0 14 TOTAL 1 117 1117 34 4 1,155 15 1170 TOTAL 2.319 2319 70 9 2398 40 2438 SBR 15 1.00 15 0 0 15 8 23 SOUTHBOUND SBT 114 1.00 114 3 0 117 0 117 SBL 0 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 129 N 129 4 0 133 8 141 0 WBR 0 N 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 WESTBOUND WBT 0 ;g 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBL 0 -8 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW 71 Street & TOTAL 0 E .... 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 4 SW59Place NBR 0 QI m 0 0 0 0 0 0 > c:i 1.00 0 NBT 317 z 1.00 317 10 0 327 0 327 NORTHBOUND NBL 36 ~ 1.00 36 1 0 37 21 58 <O TOTAL 353 ,, 353 11 0 364 21 385 I!? EBR 6 :::, 1.00 6 0 0 6 1 7 EBT 0 f. 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 EASTBOUND EBL 5 1.00 5 0 0 5 17 22 TOTAL 11 11 0 0 11 18 29 TOTAL 493 493 15 0 508 47 555 ©Richard Garcia and Associates, Inc., 2008 6/27/2022 175 z 0 j:: o. WO ~z w I- ~ 5 Notes: 1 2 INTERSECTION NAME APPROACH SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND SW 71 Street & SW61 Avenue NORTHBOUND EASTBOUND TOTAL 1 Intersection Name 2 Intersection Approach 3 Intersection Approach Movement 4 Raw Data 5 Date of Count 6 Peak Hour Factor 7 Peak Season Conversion Factor (PSCF} ©Richard Garcia and Associates, Inc., 2008 TABLE:A& INTERSECTION APPROACH VOLUMES -AM PEAK 3 MOVEMENT SBR SBT SBL TOTAL WBR WBT WBL TOTAL NBR NBT NBL TOTAL EBR EBT EBL TOTAL 4 AM PEAK HOUR COUNT 0 53 15 68 12 0 6 18 3 13 0 16 0 0 0 0 102 Project Name: 6075 Sunset Drive 5 8 7 8 9 10 AM PEAK BACKGROUND DATE TRAFFIC GROWTH SEASONALLY COMMITTED OF PHF PSCF ADJUSTED @1.0% FOR TRIPS COUNT ESTIMATING 2024 (EXISTING) VOLUMES 1.00 0 0 0 1.00 53 2 3 .. 1.00 15 0 0 ~ 68 2 3 N 1.00 12 0 0 g 1.00 0 0 0 1i 1.00 6 0 0 i .., 18 1 0 ai 1.00 3 0 D 0 c:i z 1.00 13 0 D :,,:; 1.00 D 0 D la ll 16 0 0 :, 1.00 0 0 0 f= 1.00 0 0 0 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 102 3 3 B Seasonally Adjusted TMC = count • PSCF (Existing Condition). 9 A 1.0 percent background growth was utilized with a project build-out of 2024. 10 Committed Development Trips 11 PROPOSED FUTURE TRAFFICW/O PROJECT (2024) 0 58 15 73 12 0 6 19 3 13 0 16 0 0 0 0 108 11 Proposed Traffic w/o Project = Seasonally Adjusted TMC + Backgound Traffic + Committed Trips 12 Project Net New Trips 13 Proposed Traffic with Project = Net Traffic w/o Project + Site Traffic 12 13 SITE PROPOSED TRAFFIC FUTURE TRAFFIC (PROJECT WI PROJECT NET TRIPS) (VPH) (2024) (VPH) 0 0 1 59 16 31 17 90 5 17 0 0 15 21 20 39 6 9 1 14 D D 7 23 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 44 152 8/27/2022 176 TABLE:A8 INTERSECTION APPROACH VOLUMES -PM PEAK Project Name: 6075 Sunset Drive z 1 2 3 4 5 8 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 0 i= PM PEAK BACKGROUND PROPOSED SITE PROPOSED 0. PM PEAK DATE TRAFFIC GROWTH FUTURE TRAFFIC WO INTERSECTION SEASONALLY COMMITTED FUTURE TRAFFIC ~z NAME APPROACH MOVEMENT HOUR OF PHF PSCF ADJUSTED @1.0% FOR TRIPS TRAFFICW/O (PROJECT WI PROJECT ~ COUNT COUNT (EXISTING) ESTIMATING 2024 PROJECT NET TRIPS) (VPH) (2024) :ii!:: VOLUMES (2024) (VPH) SBR 263 1.00 263 8 0 271 1 272 SOUTHBOUND SBT 0 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBL 0 ~ 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 263 263 8 0 271 1 272 WBR 32 IN 1.00 32 1 0 33 5 38 WESTBOUND WBT 670 t 1.00 670 20 2 692 5 697 SW72 Street WBL 0 11 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (Sunset Drive) & TOTAL 702 E iii 702 21 2 725 10 735 NBR 0 ~ a, 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW59Place c:i NBT 0 z 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND NBL 0 ~ 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 l! 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBR 0 :, 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 360 ~ 1.00 360 11 0 371 0 371 EASTBOUND EBL 176 1.00 178 5 0 183 9 192 TOTAL 538 538 16 0 554 9 563 TOTAL 1503 1503 46 2 1.551 20 1571 SBR 99 1.00 99 3 9 111 18 129 SOUTHBOUND SBT 0 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBL 0 csi 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 99 99 3 9 111 18 129 WBR 9 ~ 1.00 9 0 0 9 5 14 WBT 924 ..; 1.00 924 28 2 954 1 955 WESTBOUND 0 WBL 0 ... 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW72Street .8 2 (Sunset Drive) & TOTAL 933 E ~ 933 28 2 963 6 969 NBR 0 !I! a, 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW61 Avenue 0 c:i NBT 0 z 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND NBL 0 ~ 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 l! 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBR 0 :, 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 536 ~ 1.00 536 16 0 552 9 561 EASTBOUND EBL 0 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 536 536 16 0 552 9 561 TOTAL 1568 1568 48 11 1.627 33 1.660 ©Richard Garcia and Associates, Inc., 2008 6/27/2022 177 TABLE:A6 INTERSECTION APPROACH VOLUMES -PM PEAK Project Name: 6075 Sunset Drive z 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 9 10 11 12 13 0 i= PM PEAK BACKGROUND PROPOSED SITE PROPOSED (.) PM PEAK DATE TRAFFIC GROWTH FUTURE TRAFFIC LJ.JQ INTERSECTION SEASONALLY COMMITTED FUTURE TRAFFIC ~z NAME APPROACH MOVEMENT HOUR OF PHF PSCF ADJUSTED @1.0% FOR TRIPS TRAFFICW/O (PROJECT W/PROJECT LJ.J COUNT COUNT ESTIMATING 2024 PROJECT NET TRIPS) I-(EXISTING) (VPH) (2024) ~ VOLUMES (2024) (VPH) SBR 224 1.00 224 7 0 231 0 231 SOUTHBOUND SBT 172 1.00 172 5 0 177 0 177 SBL 44 1.00 44 1 0 45 0 45 TOTAL 440 440 13 0 453 0 453 WBR 16 ,;; 1.00 16 0 0 16 0 16 WBT 940 ~ 1.00 940 28 6 974 12 986 WESTBOUND WBL 83 ..; 1.00 83 3 3 89 7 96 0 WBU 6 :;; 1.00 6 0 0 6 0 6 SW72 Street n TOTAL 1045 E lO 1.045 32 9 1 086 19 1105 3 (Sunset Drive) & r-- NBR 30 QI m 1.00 34 > 0 30 1 0 31 3 SW62Avenue 0 NBT 183 z 1.00 183 6 2 191 3 194 NORTHBOUND NBL 180 :,:; 1.00 180 5 0 185 0 185 "' TOTAL 393 ~ 393 12 2 407 6 413 EBR 97 ::, 1.00 97 3 0 100 0 100 ,:;;; EBT 469 I-1.00 469 14 0 463 6 489 EASTBOUND EBL 119 1.00 119 4 3 126 4 130 EBU 85 1.00 85 3 0 86 0 88 TOTAL 770 no 23 3 796 10 806 TOTAL 2 648 2648 80 14 2742 35 2777 SBR 23 1.00 23 1 0 24 7 31 SOUTHBOUND SBT 244 1.00 244 7 0 251 0 251 SBL 0 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 267 ,;; 267 8 0 275 7 282 0 WBR 0 N 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBT 0 ..f 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 WBL 0 :;; 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 n r-- 4 SW 71 Street & TOTAL 0 E U'l 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW59 Place NBR QI <IO 0 > 0 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 218 z 1.00 218 7 0 225 0 225 NORTHBOUND NBL 23 :,:; 1.00 23 1 0 24 14 38 "' TOTAL 241 'C 241 7 0 248 14 262 ~ EBR 9 ::, 1.00 9 0 0 9 1 10 EBT 0 i= 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 EASTBOUND EBL 17 1.00 17 1 0 18 19 37 TOTAL 26 26 1 0 27 20 47 TOTAL 534 534 16 0 550 41 591 ©Richard Garcia and Associates, Inc., 2008 6/27/2022 178 z 0 i= frlo ~z ~ !: 5 Notes: 1 2 INTERSECTION NAME APPROACH SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND SW 71 Street & SW61 Avenue NORTHBOUND EASTBOUND TOTAL 1 Intersection Name 2 Intersection Approach 3 Intersection Approach Movement 4 Raw Data 5 Date of Count 6 Peak Hour Factor 7 Peak Season Conversion Factor (PSCF) ©Richard Garcia and Associates, Inc., 2008 TABLE:AI INTERSECTION APPROACH VOLUMES -PM PEAK 3 MOVEMENT SBR SBT SBL TOTAL WBR WBT WBL TOTAL NBR NBT NBL TOTAL EBR EBT EBL TOTAL Project Name: 6075 Sunset Drive 4 5 8 7 8 a 10 11 BACKGROUND PROPOSED PM PEAK PM PEAK DATE SEASONALLY TRAFFIC GROWTH COMMITTED FUTURE HOUR COUNT 0 57 7 64 19 0 41 60 2 18 0 20 0 0 0 0 144 OF PHF PSCF ADJUSTED @1.0%FOR TRIPS COUNT (EXISTING) ESTIMATING 2024 VOLUMES 1.00 0 0 0 1.00 57 2 9 ... 1.00 7 0 0 N 64 2 9 0 N 1.00 19 1 0 sf 1.00 0 0 0 0 jj 1.00 41 1 0 E C') 60 2 0 C') ~ 110 1.00 2 0 0 0 z 1.00 18 1 0 ,.; 1.00 0 0 0 Ill "0 20 1 0 r! ::, 1.00 0 0 0 F 1.00 0 0 0 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 144 4 9 6 Seasonally Adjusted TMC = Count • PSCF (Existing Condition). 9 A 1.0 percent background growth was utilized with a project build-out of 2024. 1 o Committed Development Trips TRAFFICW/0 PROJECT (2024) 0 68 7 75 20 0 42 62 2 19 0 21 0 0 0 0 157 11 Proposed Traffic w/o Project = Seasonally Adjusted TMC + Backgound Traffic + Committed Trips 12 Project Net New Trips 13 Proposed Traffic with Project= Net Traffic w/o Project+ Site Traffic 12 13 SITE PROPOSED TRAFFIC FUTURE TRAFFIC (PROJECT WI PROJECT NET TRIPS) (VPH) (2024) (VPH) 0 0 1 69 11 18 12 87 7 27 0 0 17 59 24 86 4 6 1 20 0 0 5 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 198 6/27/2022 179 I SW 59 PL Southbound ·1 Start Time Rig hi I Thru I Left I Peds I "" w..i 07:00AM 11 0 0 0 11 07 :15 AM 16 0 0 0 16 07 :30 AM 9 0 0 0 9 07:45AM 7 0 0 0 7 Total 43 0 0 0 43 I 08:0 0 AM 38 0 0 0 38 08 :1 5 AM 42 0 0 0 42 08 :30AM 23 0 0 0 23 08:45AM 17 0 0 0 17 Tot al 120 0 0 0 120 Grand Total 163 0 0 0 163 Apprch % 100 0 0 0 Total% 6 .5 0 0 0 6 .5 Cars 163 0 0 0 1 63 % Cars 100 0 0 0 100 Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 1' -;-, \ A'~ 00 0"' -g 0.. Richard Garcia & Associates , Inc. 8065 NW 98 Street Hialeah Gardens , FL 33016 Phone : 305-362-0677 Fax: 305-675-6474 G roups P . d C nnte • ars • T k rue s SW72ST SW 59 PL Westbound Northb o und File Name Site Code Start Date Page No : SW 59 PI_SW 72 St_AM : 00000000 : 11/4/2021 : 1 SW72 ST Eastbound Riohl I Thru I Left I Peds I ,._.., '"" R!Qhl I Thru I Left I Peds I ..,, ,.,., Ri9ht I Th ru I Le ft I P ed s I ..,, '"'' 1n:. ToU,l I 13 53 0 0 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 103 0 2 11 288 13 93 0 0 106 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 116 0 207 329 10 93 0 0 103 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 83 0 172 284 8 95 0 0 103 0 0 0 0 0 0 94 86 0 180 290 44 334 0 0 378 0 0 0 0 0 0 382 388 0 770 1191 15 75 0 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 83 0 186 31 4 10 108 0 0 118 0 0 0 0 0 0 98 80 0 178 338 14 91 0 0 105 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 72 0 165 293 12 121 0 0 133 0 0 0 0 0 0 138 66 0 204 354 5 1 395 0 0 446 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 32 301 0 733 1299 95 729 0 0 824 0 0 0 0 0 0 814 689 0 1503 2490 11 .5 88 .5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 .2 45 .8 0 3.8 29.3 0 0 33 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 .7 27 .7 0 60.4 95 712 0 0 807 0 0 0 0 0 0 798 686 0 1484 2454 100 97 .7 0 0 97.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 98 99 .6 0 98 .7 98 .6 0 17 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 3 0 19 36 0 2 .3 0 0 2.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 ,4 0 1.3 1.4 0 111 T o la! ~ 84 I ~I 163 0 0 0 0 0 163 0 0 :r Ped s T w "' ~o ::rill 5. -v, Otll North CD 11/4/2021 07:00 AM 11/4/2021 08:4 5 AM ,- Ca rs re. .... -000 True.k s ~~ -0 2 C: a. le. ., 0 00 "' ti Left Ped s 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' -_gl I_JI 180 SW 59 PL Richard Garc ia & Associates , Inc. 8065 NW 98 Street Hialeah Gardens, FL 33016 Phone: 305-362-0677 Fax : 305-675 -6474 SW72ST SW 59 PL Southbound Westbou n d Northb ound File Name Site Code Start Date Page No : SW 59 PI_SW 72 St_AM : 00000000 : 11/4/2021 :2 SW72ST Eastbound Start T ime RI ht Thru Left Peds ,..,_ r«.1 R ht Thru Left Peds "'' r,,.,, I RI ht Thru Left Peds ... T ,;:.,J RI hi Thru Left Ped• .... T<UI lnl. ToUI Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08 :45 AM -Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 0 8:00 AM OB:OOAM 3B 0 0 0 38 15 75 0 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 83 0 186 314 08:15 AM 42 0 0 0 42 10 10B 0 0 11 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 98 80 0 178 33B OB:3 0 AM 23 0 0 0 23 14 9 1 0 0 105 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 72 0 165 293 08 :45AM 17 0 0 0 17 12 121 0 0 133 0 0 0 0 0 0 138 66 0 204 354 Total Volume 120 0 0 0 120 51 395 0 0 446 0 0 0 0 0 0 432 301 0 733 1299 % Aoo. Total PHF .714 .000 .ODO .000 .714 .850 .816 .000 .000 .838 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .783 .907 .000 .898 .91 7 Out Total l A1v\ Cilll Om -~ 120 0 0 :r Left Peds 4 Pea k Ho ur Data -~ gi_j" u .. ..., i ~~ ~o ..J ;:!'.~ ~ North "' ~2_. ... ~ Peak Hour Begins a t 08:00 AM ,- Cars r~ ... -0 0"' Trucks ~~ "O -0 "' II) CJ 0. -0.. "'0 ~ i rt "" '%" ,~, I oJ o oJ al 1 I c=_Q] 0 c=_Q] Out In Total 181 I SW61 AVE Southbo und Richard Garcia & Associates, Inc . 8065 NW 98 Street Hialeah Gardens, FL 33016 Phone: 305-362-0677 Fax : 305-675-6474 Groups Printe d• Cars • Trucks SW72ST SW61 AVE Westb ound Northbound Fi le Name Site Code Start Date Page No : SW 61 Ave_SW 72 St_AM : 0 0 000000 : 11/4/2021 : 1 SW72 ST Eastbound I Start Time I Ria h1 I Thru I Left I Peds I ,._,, To, I Ri oh t I Thru I Left I Ped s I .,, ,.,., Riohl I Thru I Left I Peds I A" ,.,., Riaht I Thru I Le ft I Peds I ,,, ,,,., Int. To:11 I 07 :00 AM 7 07 :15 AM 6 07 :30AM 5 07:45AM 7 Tota l 25 08:00AM 5 08 :15 AM 10 08 :30AM 7 08:45AM 5 Tota l 27 Grand Total 52 Apprch % 100 Total ¾ 2 .1 Cars 52 %Cars 100 Trucks 0 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J' iA~ 7 2 63 6 3 107 5 2 100 7 5 98 25 12 368 5 3 111 10 13 137 7 3 111 5 4 137 27 23 496 52 2.1 52 100 0 0 N O N u, "C ft. 35 864 3 .9 96 1.4 34.5 35 846 100 97.9 0 18 0 2.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 0 110 1 103 0 103 1 381 0 114 0 150 0 114 0 141 0 519 1 900 0.1 0 36 1 882 100 98 0 18 0 2 Out g 5 52 0 52 Le ft 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total g 7 a a 0 0 a a Peds :r 4 T North 1 1/4/2021 07:00 A M 11/4/2021 08:45 AM Cars Trucks ~ Left Pcd s a a a a a a g g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 221 0 215 0 181 0 191 0 808 0 186 0 180 0 168 0 206 0 740 0 1548 0 99 .9 0 61 .9 0 1523 0 98.4 0 25 0 1.6 ::T t.J tJ 0 u [ij;j -u,ou, w!,. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 221 293 0 215 331 0 18 1 289 0 191 301 0 808 121 4 0 186 305 2 182 342 0 168 289 0 206 352 2 74 2 1288 2 1550 2502 0.1 0.1 62 2 1525 2459 100 98.4 98 .3 0 25 43 0 1.6 1.7 182 Richard Garc ia & Associates, Inc . 8065 NW 98 Street Hialeah Gardens, FL 33016 Phone: 305-362-0677 Fax: 305-675-6474 SW 61 AVE SW 72 ST SW 61 AVE Southbound Westbound Northbound File Name Site Co de Start Date Page No : SW 61 Ave_SW 72 St_AM : 00000000 : 11/4/2021 :2 SW72ST Eastbound Start Time Ri ht Thru Left Peds ,.,, rc-..:1 Ri ht Thru Left Peds "°" r= Ri ht Thru Left Peds ,.,, Tc<.i RI ht Thru Left Peds I ,.,, T.,., Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM -Peak 1 or 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersecti on Begins at 08:00 AM 08 :00AM 5 0 0 0 5 3 111 0 0 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 186 0 0 186 305 08 :15 AM 10 0 0 0 10 13 137 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 180 0 2 182 342 08 :30AM 7 0 0 0 7 3 111 0 0 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 168 0 0 168 289 08:45AM 5 0 0 0 5 4 137 0 0 141 0 0 0 0 0 0 206 0 0 206 352 Total Volume 27 0 0 0 27 23 496 0 0 519 0 0 0 0 0 0 740 0 2 742 1288 •A, Acc. Total PHF .675 .000 .000 .000 .675 .442 .905 .000 .000 .865 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .898 .000 .250 .900 .915 Out To tal \\-1 Aµ\ cw c:::::]QJ 27 0 0 :r Left Peds 4 Peak Ho ur Data -~ o~_j' u nl ID T ~~ ~o ..J :,-o-J s. -w North 0 0:, ~.c-. I- Peak Hour Begins at 08 :00 AM r Cars +~ -~ -o Trucks [@~ a"' N"' -0 ~ 0 e: c.. n. .. 0 "" Jr '"' I oj o o j ol I I C]J O C]J Out In Total 183 I SW62AVE Southbound Richard Garcia & Associates, Inc. 8065 NW 98 Street Hialeah Gardens, FL 33016 Phone: 305-362-0677 Fax: 305-675-6474 Grouos Printed-Cars -Trucks SW 72 ST SW62AVE Westbound Northbound File Name Site Code Start Date Page No : SW 62 Ave_SW 72 St_AM : 00000000 : 11/4/2021 · : 1 SW72ST Eastbound I StartTime Riaht I Tllru I Left I Pe ds I ,~ r "" Rio hl I T hru I Left I .,,_ I Ped s I •= T"" Ri!l ht I Thru I Left I Peds I ""''"" Rlo nt I Tllru I Left I .,,_ I Ped• I .... ,..., It! Tot.: I 07 :00AM 14 26 07:15 AM 14 42 07 :30AM 21 37 07 :45AM 12 40 Total 61 145 08 :00 AM 21 50 08 :15 AM 28 55 08:30 AM 37 68 08:45 AM 22 52 Total 108 225 Grand Total 169 370 Apprch % 27.6 60 .4 Total% 3 .8 8.4 Cars 166 36 1 % Cars 98 .2 97 .6 Trucks 3 9 % Trucks 1 .8 2 .4 4 7 10 7 28 8 11 10 9 38 66 10 .8 1.5 59 89.4 7 10.6 1 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 4 6 8 1.3 0 .2 8 100 0 0 45 4 60 64 3 98 68 4 86 59 6 87 236 17 331 79 20 74 95 9 1 11 116 6 90 87 10 108 377 I 45 383 613 62 714 6 .7 n,5 14 1.4 16.3 594 57 704 96.9 91 .9 9B .6 19 5 10 3.1 8.1 1.4 7 14 15 13 49 18 29 17 24 88 137 14.9 3.1 134 97 .8 3 2.2 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 3 1 6 7 0.8 0.2 7 100 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.1 0 1 10 0 0 0 71 115 105 108 399 114 149 116 143 522 921 21 903 98 18 2 i North 4 23 19 3 29 23 3 38 27 2 43 27 12 133 96 5 43 33 5 4 1 27 5 45 28 2 47 28 17 176 116 29 309 212 5.2 55 .7 36.2 0.7 7 4.8 29 305 211 100 98 .7 99 .5 0 4 1 0 1.3 0 .5 11/4/2021 07:00 AM 11/4/2021 08 :45 AM Ca rs Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 5 5 0 .9 0.1 5 100 0 0 46 48 218 52 55 43 212 55 68 27 174 51 72 31 189 64 241 149 793 222 82 32 180 58 76 29 165 55 79 39 161 57 77 59 202 66 314 159 708 236 555 308 1501 458 13 .4 65 .2 19 .9 12 .6 7 34 .2 10 .4 550 307 1483 452 99 .1 99.7 9B .6 98 .7 5 1 18 6 0 .9 0 .3 1.2 1.3 :::rcn "' 0 u [i[J _.,u,-., _s. 1 3 9 7 20 4 2 4 4 14 34 1.5 0 .8 34 100 0 0 0 319 0 313 0 261 0 291 0 1184 0 274 0 25 1 0 26 1 0 331 0 1117 0 2301 0 0 52.4 0 2276 0 98.9 0 25 0 1.1 48 1 547 502 530 2060 549 57 1 572 638 2330 4390 4323 98 .5 67 1.5 184 SW62AVE Southbound Richard Garcia & Associates, Inc. 8065 NW 98 Street Hialeah Gardens, FL 33016 Phone: 305-362-0677 Fax: 305-675-6474 File Name : SW 62 Ave_SW 72 St_AM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/4/2021 Page No : 2 SW72ST Westbound SW 62 AVE SW 72 ST Northbound Eastbound T... Ri hi Thru Left Peds "-> T... R" ht Ttvu Left ... ,~~ Ped& b T<=>I 1/0 Tmt Peak Hour Analysis From 07 :00 AM to 08:45 AM -Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08 :00 AM 08 :00 AM 21 50 8 0 79 20 74 18 2 0 114 5 43 33 1 82 32 180 58 4 0 274 549 08 :15AM 28 55 11 1 95 9 111 29 0 0 149 5 41 27 3 76 29 165 55 2 0 251 571 08 :30Af.A 37 68 10 1 116 6 90 17 3 0 116 5 45 28 1 79 39 161 57 4 0 261 572 08 :45AM 22 52 9 4 87 10 108 24 1 0 143 2 47 28 0 77 59 202 66 4 0 331 638 T01.iJ.IV0!1.1ma 108 225 38 6 377 45 383 8B 6 0 522 17 176 116 5 314 159 708 236 14 0 1117 2330 '½ Ai,p. Total 28.6 59.7 10 .1 1.6 8.6 73.4 16.9 1.1 0 5.4 56 .1 36.9 1.6 14.2 63.4 21.1 1.3 0 PHF .730 .827 .854 .375 .813 .563 .863 .759 .500 .000 .876 .850 .936 .879 .417 .957 .674 .876 .894 .875 .000 .844 .913 Out Total Lill] LIB! 10B 6 Peds Peak Hour Data =~ ~~_t T u -,-. ~o {!.~ ...J -::"-s -'11 North (.I Peak Hour Beg ins at 08:00 AM -~ Cars Trucks i~ 6"' ... "' "'[] !?. ~.,, ~ <J "' 0.. "' "' - +i Left Peds 116 5 Om Coo Out Total 185 I I Start Time 07:00AM 07:15 AM 07 :30AM 07:45AM Total 08:00AM 08:15 AM 08:30AM 08:45AM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total% Cars % Cars Trucks % Trucks SW59PL Southbound Right I Thru I Left I Peds I ..,, r,,., 0 11 2 16 4 9 1 7 7 43 2 37 4 41 3 21 6 15 15 114 22 157 12.2 87.2 2.2 15.9 22 156 100 99.4 0 1 0 0.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.6 0 .1 1 100 0 0 'r-..}\ .>.-i,\ ·"-'),- ""'' "' -□ON ~ 11 18 13 8 50 39 46 24 21 130 160 18.3 179 99.4 1 0.6 Richard Garcia & Associates, Inc. 8065 NW 98 Street Hialeah Gardens, FL 33016 Phone: 305-362-0677 Fax: 305-675-6474 G roups rinted-C ars -T k rue s SW71 ST SW59 PL Westbound Northbound File Name Site Code Start Date Page No : SW 59 PI_SW 71 St_AM : 00000000 : 11/4/2021 : 1 SW71 ST Eastbound Righi I Thru I Left I Peds I ..,, re-~, Righi I Thru I Left I Peds I ,,. re,,, Riahl I Th ru I Left I Peds I ''" ,,,., 11\1 TO,ol I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 5 5 100 0 .5 5 100 0 0 Out bi] 36 22 0 22 :rht 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 5 5 0 .5 5 100 0 0 0 111 5 0 123 7 0 91 3 0 88 6 0 413 21 0 91 7 0 88 3 0 76 10 0 62 16 0 317 36 0 730 57 0 92 .8 7.2 0 74 .1 5.8 0 723 57 0 99 100 0 7 0 0 1 0 Tot.al bi] 6 a 1 0 0 0 1 Left Peds 4 T North 11 /4/2021 07:00 AM 11/4/2021 0B :45 AM Cars Trucks t-i Left Peds 57 a a a 57 a brl] 3 ~ 0 ~-- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 130 94 94 434 98 91 86 78 353 787 79 .9 780 99 .1 7 0.9 u :::T -000 "Cl ff> C. VI (1\ 0 tn 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 6 6 46 .2 0.6 6 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 1 1 5 6 46.2 0.6 6 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 7.7 0 .1 1 100 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 4 3 4 12 13 1.3 13 100 0 0 127 148 107 103 485 140 141 115 104 500 985 977 99 .2 8 0.8 186 SW 59 PL Richard Garcia & Associates, Inc . 80 65 NW 98 Street Hialeah Gardens, FL 33016 Phone: 305-362-0677 Fax: 305-675-6474 SW 71 ST Southbound Westbound SW 59 PL Northbound Start Time I R" ht Thru Left Peos >:, r"" Ri ht Thru Left Peds ;.;, r,,., Ri ht Thru Left I Peds Peak Hour Ana lysis From 07 :00 AM to 08:45 AM -Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00 AM 08:00AM 2 37 0 0 39 0 0 08:15 AM 4 41 0 1 46 0 0 08 :30 AM 3 21 0 0 24 0 0 08:45AM 6 15 0 0 21 0 0 Total Volume 15 1 14 0 1 130 0 0 %APP . Total 0 2 2 0 91 0 0 0 0 88 0 2 2 0 76 0 1 1 0 62 0 5 5 0 317 PHF .625 .695 .000 .250 .707 .000 .000 .000 .625 .625 .000 .871 1\.fV' Ou1 Total ·11 u Om 0g) 15 0 1 :r Left Pcds 4 Pe ak Ho ur Data 5~ "'~j T (3. ..J 02 North .i:;;----+ I- Peak Hour Begins at 08 :00 AM Cars 8~ ~., Tnr..l<s "O "' a. .-, Left 36 0 CillJ Lill) Out Total 7 0 3 0 10 0 16 0 36 0 .563 .000 File Name Site Code Start Date Page No : SW 59 PI_SW 71 St_AM : 00000000 9 8 1 91 1 86 2 78 2 353 6 .901 .750 u ::r -o r-..r-~ -o "tl "' C. .. CJ> : 11/4/2021 :2 SW71 ST Eastbound Thru Left Peds 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 5 1 .000 .417 .250 □~ Qi - 1 140 4 141 3 115 4 104 12 500 .750 .887 187 I I StartTime 07:00AM 07 :1 5AM 07:30AM 07 :45AM To ta l 08 :00AM 08:15 AM 08:30AM 08:45AM To tal Grand Total Apprch % Total% Cars %Cars Trucks % Trucks SW 61 AVE Southbound Richard Garcia & Associates, Inc . 8065 NW 98 St reet Hialeah Gardens , FL 33016 Phone: 305-362-0677 Fax: 305 -675-6474 Grouos Printed-Cars -T r ucks SW71 ST SW61 AVE Westbound Northbound File Name : SW 61 Ave_SW 71 St_AM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/4/2021 Page No : 1 SW71 ST Eastbound Riehl I Thru I Left I Peds I ffl>. ro<,1 Riqht I Thru I Left I Peds I A ,. Toul Riah t I Thru I Left I Peds I ,v.,. r,,., Rl aht I Thru I Left I Peds I "''· r,,., In:.. Tolal I 0 5 0 0 6 1 0 12 1 0 15 3 0 38 5 0 9 2 0 14 6 0 15 4 D B 7 0 46 19 0 84 24 0 77 .1 22 0 49.7 14.2 0 84 24 0 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.9 0.6 1 100 0 0 5 1 7 4 13 1 18 4 43 10 11 1 20 2 20 5 15 2 66 10 109 20 55 .6 64.5 11.8 109 20 100 100 0 0 0 0 ~Y }\Iv\ ½ . sLJJ 00 o'aj_f ~ -' ;gLJJ 00 0 .. .., "' a. 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 1 0 9 1 3 2 1 7 16 44.4 9.5 16 100 0 0 Out 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 g 0 0 0 0 :r 5 8 2 4 19 2 5 7 3 17 36 21 .3 36 100 0 0 T North 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 3 1 4 1 5 11 1 4 3 1 9 20 12.5 83 .3 1.8 11.8 3 20 100 100 0 0 0 0 Total g 9 1 0 1 Ped s 11/412021 07 :00 AM 11/4/2021 08 :45 AM Cars Tru cks ~ Left Ped s 0 1 0 D 0 1 ~ DO ~ 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 D 1 4.2 0.6 1 100 0 0 ... ;o L,l5· :! r +~ 'U m a. 1 4 1 5 11 2 5 5 1 13 24 14.2 24 100 0 0 "' "' 000 cnom "'0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 · 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 []~ .... [;]~ 0 6i - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 19 16 27 73 15 30 32 19 96 169 169 100 0 0 188 Richard Garcia & Associates, Inc. 8065 NW 98 Street Hialeah Gardens, FL 33016 Phone: 305-362-0677 Fax : 30 5 -675-6474 File Name Site Code Start Date Page No : SW 61 Ave_SW 71 St_AM : 00000000 : 11/4/2021 :2 SW 61 AVE SW 71 ST SW 61 AVE SW 71 ST Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Ri ht Thru Left Peds ,.,, T<t ai Ri ht Thru Left Peds "-• r.-..i RI ht Thru Left Peds ,.., T•u • Ri ht Thru Left Peds "''· r«.i 1nt Tc1a1 Peak Hour Analysis From 07 :00 AM to 08:45 AM -Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45 AM 07 :45AM 0 16 3 0 18 4 0 08:00AM 0 9 2 0 11 1 0 08:15 AM 0 14 6 0 2 0 2 0 08:30AM 0 15 4 1 20 5 0 Total Volume 0 53 15 1 69 12 0 %Aoo . Tota l PHF .000 .883 .625 .250 .863 .600 .000 -\J s Av. i □ 0 ~...:t ..J 8 □ 0 .. 'C QJ 0. 0 0 4 0 5 1 0 2 1 1 3 0 5 0 4 2 0 7 2 3 6 0 18 3 13 .500 .000 .643 .375 .650 Out Total ~ C@ 0 1 :r Peds Pea k Ho ur Data T North Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 AM Cars Truci<s ~ Left 0 ~ Out Peds C]§J Total 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 32 0 1 17 0 0 0 0 0 104 .000 .250 .850 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .813 u ~~ ::,-~ _.., ,... .r-g, m ~~ -0 & e;: "'0 189 I SW59 P L Southbound Richard Garcia & Associates , Inc . 8065 NW 98 Street Hialeah Gardens, FL 33016 Phone: 305-362-0677 Fax: 305-675-6474 Groups rinte -ars -rue s p· dC T k SW72ST SW 59 PL Westbound Northbound File Name Site Code Start Date Page No : SW 59 PL_SW 72 St_PM : 00000000 : 11/4/2021 : 1 SW72ST Eastbound I Start Time Ri ghi I Thru I Left I Peds I .,._ r .w Righi I Thru I Left I Peds I ...., rou, Right I Thru I Left I Peds I "'" r cco, R ioht I Thru I Left I Peds I Ao,. ro:,1 lnL TOl•l I 04 :00 PM 54 04 :15 PM 56 04 :30 PM 79 04 :45 PM 61 Total 250 05:00 PM 62 05:15 PM 69 05:30 PM 71 05:45PM 76 Total 278 Gra~d Total 528 Apprch % 100 Total% 17.7 Cars 528 % Cars 100 Trucks 0 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 10 146 0 56 7 154 0 79 6 161 0 61 11 187 0 250 34 648 0 62 8 170 0 69 5 144 0 71 8 169 0 76 8 135 0 278 29 618 0 528 63 1266 0 4.7 95.3 0 17.7 2.1 42.4 0 528 61 1231 0 100 96 .8 97 .2 0 0 2 35 0 0 3 .2 2.8 :;ftl PH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Out 0 156 0 161 0 167 0 198 0 682 0 178 0 149 0 177 0 143 0 647 0 1329 0 0 44.5 0 1292 0 97 .2 0 37 0 2 .8 bl] 5 528 a 528 Left 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total ~ 3 a a 0 0 0 0 Peds :r 4 T North 11/4/2021 04:00 PM 11/4/2021 05:45 PM Cars Trucks ~ Left Peds 0 a a a a 0 I ~JI I_J I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 56 0 93 47 0 78 59 0 83 43 0 362 205 0 79 48 0 95 47 0 103 40 0 110 42 0 387 177 0 749 382 0 66.2 33.8 0 25 .1 12 .8 0 739 377 0 98.7 98 .7 0 10 5 0 1.3 1.3 0 164 374 0 140 357 0 137 383 0 126 385 0 567 1499 0 127 367 0 142 360 0 143 391 0 152 371 0 564 1489 0 1131 2988 0 0 37 .9 0 1116 2936 0 98 .7, 98 .3 0 15 52 0 1.3 1.7 190 SW 59 PL Richard Garc ia & Associates , Inc . 8065 NW 98 Street Hialeah Gardens, FL 33016 Phone: 305-362-0677 Fax: 305-675-6474 SW72ST Southbound Westbound SW59 PL Northbound File Name : SW 59 PL_SW 72 St_PM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/4/2021 Page No : 2 SW72 ST Eastbound Start Time Ri hl Thru Left Peds ,_,, 1...i Ri ht Thru Left Peds Thru Left Peds ,\CO,, TLUJ Ri ht Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Analysis From 04 :00 PM to 05 :45 PM • Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04 ·45 PM 04:45 PM 61 0 0 0 61 11 187 0 0 198 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 43 0 126 385 05 :00 PM 62 0 0 0 62 8 170 0 0 178 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 48 0 127 367 05 :15 PM 69 0 0 0 69 5 144 0 0 149 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 47 0 142 360 05:30 PM 71 0 0 0 71 8 169 0 0 177 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 40 0 143 391 Total Vo lume 263 0 0 0 263 32 670 0 0 702 0 0 0 0 0 0 360 178 0 538 1503 %ADD. Total PHF .926 .000 .000 .000 .926 .727 .896 .000 .000 .886 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .874 .927 .000 .941 .961 Ou! Tola! Cfill CillJ 263 0 0 Left Peds 4 Peak Hour Data s~ ~i';.J' T u ~o 0..,. ... ~ _, ::re:.> s. _,_, North 0 Peak Hour Begins at 04 :45 PM ,- C= ,e-a ~a 0 .. Trucks i ~ "O 'C 0 -"' C. ., a. ., 0 - "" "g;"' ,.,, I ol o 01 01 I I c::::ID O c::::ID Out In Tola! 191 I SW61 AVE Southbound I Start TIITle Right I Thru I Left I Peds I ,..,. T.w 04:00 PM 29 04:15 PM 25 04 :30 PM 26 04 :45 PM 26 To ta l 106 05 :00 PM 30 05 :15 PM 17 05 :30 PM 12 05 :45 PM 14 Total 73 Grand To tal 179 Apprch % 100 Total% 5 .7 Cars 179 % Ca rs 100 Trucks 0 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 -jl i,fV\ 29 25 26 26 106 30 17 12 14 73 179 5.7 179 100 0 0 Richard Garc ia & Associates , Inc . 8065 NW 98 Street Hialeah Gardens, FL 33016 Phone: 305-362-0677 Fax: 305-675-6474 G roups P . t d C rin e • ars -T k rue s SW 72ST SW61 AVE Westbound Northbound File Name Site Code Start Date Page No : SW 61 Ave_SW 72 St_PM :·00000000 : 11/4/2021 : 1 SW72ST Eastbound Right I Thru I Left I Peds I ,.,,. TcUJ Righi I Thru I Left I Peds I ,.,o. To:.i Rig ht I Thru I Left I Peds I Arm Toa, lol.lC,ll I 6 197 1 211 2 239 3 246 12 893 1 231 3 208 3 236 1 211 8 886 20 1ng 1.1 98 .8 0.6 57.1 20 1756 100 98 .7 0 23 0 1.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 203 0 212 0 241 0 249 0 905 0 232 2 213 0 239 0 212 2 896 2 1801 0.1 0 .1 57.8 2 1778 100 98 .7 0 23 o 1.3 OU, g 0 179 a 179 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total ~ 9 0 0 a 0 0 0 :r Left Peds 4 T North 11/4/2021 04:00 PM 11/412021 05 :45 PM Cars Trucks t-i Left Peds 0 0 0 0 a 0 g g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 D D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 158 0 140 0 132 0 125 0 555 0 129 0 150 0 148 0 153 0 580 0 1135 0 99.8 D 36.4 0 1118 0 98 .5 0 17 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 159 391 0 140 377 0 132 399 0 125 400 1 556 1567 0 129 391 1 151 381 0 148 399 0 153 379 1 581 1550 2 1137 3117 0.2 0.1 36.5 2 1120 3077 10 0 98 .5 98 .7 o 17 40 o 1.5 1.3 192 SW61 AVE Richard Garc ia & AssociatesJ Inc . 8065 NW 98 Street Hialeah Gardens , FL 33016 Phone: 305-362-0677 Fax: 305-675-6474 SW72ST SW61 AVE File Name Site Code Start Date Page No : SW 61 Ave_SW 72 S t_PM : 00000000 : 11/4/2021 :2 SW72ST Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Tim e · ht Thru Left Peds ,._.,,_ ,.,., Ri hi Thru Le ft Peds ,... "''' Ri hi Thru Left Peds ,_,, r,ui Ri hi Thru Left Peds ,.,. ,.,., 101. T,1111 Peak Hour Ana lys is From 04 :00 PM to 05:45 PM -Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire In tersection Begins at 04 :30 PM 04 :30 PM 26 0 0 0 26 2 239 0 0 241 0 0 04 :45 PM 26 0 0 0 26 3 246 0 0 249 0 0 05:00 PM 30 0 0 0 30 1 231 0 0 232 0 0 05:15 PM 17 0 0 0 17 3 208 0 2 213 0 0 Total Vol ume 99 0 0 0 99 g 924 0 2 935 0 0 %Aoo. Total PHF .825 .000 .ODO .000 .825 .750 .939 .000 .250 .939 .ODO .000 -~ o'ii;J' "''° -,,, {!.-...., -., ,, 0 C. Out To tal c:::::]] ~ 99 0 0 :r Left Peds 4 Peak Hour Data T North Peak Hour Beg ins at 04 :30 PM Cars Trucks +i Left 0 C]] Out Peds 0 ~ Tot.11 0 0 0 0 132 0 0 132 399 0 0 0 0 125 0 0 125 400 0 0 0 0 129 0 0 129 391 0 0 0 0 150 0 1 151 381 0 0 0 0 536 0 1 537 1S71 .ODO .000 .ODO .000 .893 .000 .250 .889 .982 u ~o ,,. ~ _,,, "' ,.. .r-?o 0 ~~ "D 8. -!!!. ""' 193 I S W62AVE Southbound Richard Garcia & Associates, Inc . 8065 NW 98 Street Hialeah Gardens , F L 33016 Phone: 305-362 -0677 Fax: 305-675-6474 G T roups Printed-Cars -rucks SW72ST SW62AVE Westbound Northbound File Name Site Code Start Date Page No : SW 62 Ave_SW 72 St_PM : 000 00000 : 11/4/2021 : 1 SW72 ST Eastbound I Sta rt Time Ri ehl I Thru I Left I Peds I "=· ,..., Riahl I Thru I Left I .,,_ I Peds I •= ,.,. Riehl I Thru I Le n. I Ped• I .,._ ,,., Rloht I Thru I Left I ,.,.,~ I Peds I .... '"" Int Td.;J I 04:00 PM 37 33 12 04:15 PM 64 47 12 04:30 PM 61 43 12 04:45 PM 37 37 10 Total 199 160 46 05:00 PM 69 47 9 05:15 PM 57 45 13 05:30 PM 60 58 14 05:45 PM 57 35 1 B Total I 243 185 54 Grand Tota l 442 345 100 Apprch % 49.8 38 ,9 11.3 Total % 8 .5 6 .6 1.9 C ars 440 342 96 % Cars 99 .5 99.1 96 Trucks 2 3 4 % Truck s 0.5 0.9 4 0 82 1 217 14 0 123 4 213 21 0 116 1 241 26 0 84 6 256 15 0 4 0 5 12 927 76 0 125 7 234 23 1 1 16 2 209 19 0 132 5 229 16 0 110 9 200 18 1 483 23 872 76 1 888 35 17 99 152 0.1 1 .8 89.9 7.6 0 17.1 0 .7 34.6 2.9 1 879 29 1783 151 100 99 82.9 99.1 99.3 0 9 6 16 1 0 1 17.1 0 .9 0.7 0 3 3 1 7 2 0 2 3 7 14 0.7 0.3 14 100 0 0 0 232 7 49 61 0 24 1 1 36 46 0 271 8 33 42 0 278 7 53 51 0 1022 23 171 20 0 0 266 8 43 42 0 230 7 54 45 0 252 6 42 45 0 230 2 42 34 0 978 23 181 166 0 2000 46 0 6 0 3 8.5 0.9 0 1977 46 0 98 .8 100 0 23 0 0 1.1 0 i North 11/4/2021 04:00 P M 11/4/2021 05:45 P M ca rs Trucks 352 366 4 5 .7 47 .5 6 .8 7 350 364 99.4 99 .5 2 2 0.6 0.5 2 119 19 134 44 15 0 212 645 0 83 20 127 21 22 0 190 637 0 83 38 114 27 23 0 202 672 2 113 18 103 27 26 0 174 649 4 398 95 478 119 86 0 778 2603 3 96 22 117 33 21 1 194 681 0 106 19 135 32 15 0 201 653 0 93 17 13 1 2 1 15 0 184 661 0 78 18 125 24 14 0 181 59 9 3 373 76 508 110 65 1 7 60 2594 7 771 171 986 229 151 1 1538 5197 0.9 11 .1 64 .1 14 .9 9.8 0 .1 0 .1 14.8 3 .3 19 4.4 2.9 0 29.6 7 767 170 973 221 151 1 1516 5139 100 99 .5 99.4 98 .7 96 .5 100 100 98.6 98 .9 0 4 1 13 8 0 0 22 58 0 0.5 0 .6 1.3 3 .5 0 0 1.4 1 .1 194 Richard Garc ia & Associates , Inc . 8065 NW 98 Street SW62AVE Southbound Hialeah Gardens, FL 33016 Phone : 305-362-0677 Fax : 305-675-6474 SW72ST Westbound SW62AVE Northbound Start T1111 e Rill!>• Thru Left Pe:ts .,. ,.... Ri Thru Left ~•-Pods ,,. ,.., R<Qllt Thru Le ft Peds Peak Hour Ana lys is From 04 :00 PM to 05:45 PM -Peak 1 of 1 Pe.ik Hour for Entire Intersect ion Begins at 04:30 PM 04 :30 PM 61 43 12 0 116 1 241 26 04 :45 PM 37 37 10 0 84 6 256 15 05:00 PM 69 47 9 0 125 7 234 23 05 :15 PM 57 45 13 1 116 2 209 19 To t.ii Vo!umo 224 172 44 1 441 16 940 83 %AD D. Tc lal 50 .8 39 10 0 .2 1.5 90 7.9 3 0 271 8 33 1 0 278 7 53 2 0 266 8 43 0 0 230 7 54 6 0 1045 30 183 0.6 0 7 .5 46 PHF .812 .915 .846 .250 .882 .571 .918 .798 .500 .000 .940 .93 8 .84 7 Out Total Cilil om 224 Peds Peak Hour Data -~ ~~J "'~ T ~N ...J North Peak Hour Begins at 04 :30 PM Cars -~ Tru cks ::i.., "'.., o ~ "'"O ., CL +i Left Peds 180 5 c:::::illl ~ 0111 Total 42 0 51 2 42 3 45 0 180 5 45.2 1.3 .88 2 .4 17 File Name Site Code Start Date Page No 83 38 11 4 113 16 103 96 22 117 106 19 135 398 97 469 12.6 60.8 .881 .63 8 .869 u :,-~ -a> '"C .. C. ~ "' : SW 62 Ave_SW 72 St_PM : 00000000 : 11/4/2021 :2 27 23 0 202 672 27 26 0 174 649 33 21 1 194 681 32 15 0 201 653 119 85 1 771 2655 15 .4 11 0 .1 .902 .817 .2 50 .954 .975 ~o =-... i ~ !l "' - 195 I SW59 PL Southbound I Start Time I Right I Thru I Left I Peels I .. ,. T<1,1 04:00 PM 04 :15 PM 04 :30 PM 04:45 PM Tota l 05 :00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Tota l Grand Total Apprch % Total% Cars % Cars Trucks % Trucks 9 51 3 56 6 78 5 59 23 244 3 62 1 66 7 70 1 72 12 270 35 514 6.4 93.6 3.3 48.9 35 511 100 99.4 0 3 0 0.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 (j 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 59 84 64 267 65 67 77 73 282 549 52 .2 546 99.5 3 0 .5 ~ tf ~:J\ "'"' .., -El o~ ~ I- ~o NO Richard Garc ia & Associates , Inc . 8065 NW 98 Street Hialeah Gardens, FL 33016 Phone: 305-362-0677 Fax: 305-675-6474 File Name Site Code Start Date Page No : SW 59 PI_SW 71 St_PM : 00000000 : 11/4/2021 : 1 Grouos Printed-Cars -Trucks SW71 ST SW 59 PL SW71 ST Westbound Northbound Eastbound Righi I Thru I Left I Peds I ,.,. y.,., Right I Thru I Left I Peds I ,._ ... Tou, Righi I Thru I Left I Peds I .,. 1.,., 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 'E_j- ..J N ~ ,:, 0 Cl. 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Out ~ 2 35 0 35 :r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a 0 a 0 0 61 0 50 0 57 0 50 0 218 0 47 a 48 0 46 0 46 0 187 0 405 0 90 .8 0 38.5 0 400 0 98.8 0 5 0 1.2 Tolal ~ 1 0 0 0 0 0 a Left Peds 4 T North n/4/2021 04:C0 PM 11/4/2021 05:45 PM Cars Tnr..ks +i Left Peds 41 0 a 0 41 D ~ ~ 8 1 Out Total 7 4 9 3 23 9 3 1 5 18 41 9.2 3.9 41 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 54 66 53 241 56 51 47 51 205 446 3 2 2 2 9 1 1 1 5 8 17 0 30,4 0 42.4 1.6 0 441 17 0 98.9 100 0 5 0 0 1.1 0 t...g! :=:o 00 r~ 000 "0 .. C. "'0 00 0 3 0 6 0 3 0 5 0 17 a s 0 1 0 2 0 11 0 20 0 37 0 66.1 0 3.5 0 37 0 100 0 0 0 0 [IJ~ loloo,~ 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 3.6 0.2 2 100 0 0 6 8 6 7 27 7 2 4 16 29 56 5 .3 56 100 0 0 lnL loto l I 134 121 156 124 535 128 120 128 140 516 1051 1043 99 .2 8 0.8 196 SW 59 PL Richard Garcia & Associates , Inc . 8065 NW 98 Street Hialeah Gardens, FL 33016 Phone : 305-362-0677 Fax: 305-675-6474 SW71 ST SW 59 PL File Name Site Code Start Date Page No : SW 59 PI_SW 71 St_PM : 00000000 : 11/4/2021 :2 SW71 ST Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time R" hi Thru Left Peds -r«,1 Ri ht Thru Left Peds """ r.,., Ri ht Thru Left Peds ,.., Tc-J, Ri ht Thru Left Peds ,.,,. r...i lnL rc,a1 Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM -Pea k 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Beg ins at 04 :00 PM 04 :00 PM 9 51 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 7 0 68 3 0 3 0 6 134 04 :15 PM 3 56 0 0 59 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 4 0 54 2 0 6 0 8 12 1 04:30 PM 6 78 0 0 84 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 9 0 66 2 0 3 1 6 156 04 :45 PM 5 59 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 3 0 53 2 0 5 0 7 124 Total Volume 23 244 0 0 267 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 18 23 0 241 9 0 17 1 27 535 %ADD. Total 8 .6 91 .4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 .5 9.5 0 33.3 0 63 3.7 PHF .639 .782 .000 .000 .795 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .893 .639 .000 .886 .750 .000 .708 .250 .844 .857 Out Total ~ i,\ ~0 CillJ ~ 23 0 0 :r Left Pads 4 Peak Hour Data a~ ~iJ T u □~ ~ ..., ::'.'o 02 North I=_. Peak Hour Begins at 04 :00 PM ,- Cars .,C-~o -~ Trucks □~ "" 'C .. §[ ~ a. "'0 +i Left Peds 23 0 ~ DE] Out Total • 197 I SW61 AVE Southbound Richard Garcia & Assoc iates , Inc . 8065 NW 98 Street Hialeah Gardens, FL 33016 Phone: 305-362-0677 Fax: 305-675-6474 Groups Printed-Cars -T k rue s SW 71 ST SW 61 AVE Westbound Northbound File Name : SW 61 Ave_SW 71 St_PM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/4/2021 Page No : 1 SW71 ST Eastbound I Start Time Right I Thru I Left I Peds I ,.,,,_ r .w Right I Thru I Left I Peds I >-• r.,., Rig ht I Thru I Left I Peds I "''· re"' Riehl I Thru I Left I Peds I -. rc.i 1111-TO'.al I 04:00 PM 0 14 04:15 PM 0 15 04:30 PM 0 17 04:45 PM 0 17 T otal 0 63 05:00 PM O 8 05 :15 PM O 7 05:30 PM O 7 05:45 PM O 5 Total I O 27 Grand Total 0 90 Apprch % 0 84 .1 Total% 0 36 .1 Cars 0 90 % Cars 0 100 Trucks 0 0 % Trucks 0 0 4 3 3 1 11 0 1 2 0 3 14 13.1 5.6 14 100 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 _8 1.2 3 100 0 0 18 0 18 3 21 6 20 2 77 11 8 8 8 1 9 4 5 5 30 18 107 29 29.6 43 11 .6 107 29 100 100 0 0 0 0 .{¾ ~~H ico 00 0-'&_j _, 00 =2 .c---. f-- -o ~ .. -,:, " 0.. 0 10 0 7 0 10 0 6 0 33 0 18 0 6 0 4 0 7 0 35 0 68 0 69.4 0 27.3 0 68 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0.4 1 100 0 0 Out g 0 0 0 0 :r 10 10 16 8 44 26 7 8 13 54 98 3 2 0 3 1 5 1 4 5 14 0 6 0 8 3 0 0 3 3 17 8 31 18 .6 72 .1 39.4 3.2 12.4 98 8 31 100 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total ~ 7 14 3 0 0 14 3 Left Peds 4 T Nonh 11/4/2021 04:00 PM 111412021 05:45 PM Car.; Tnus +i Left Peds 0 4 0 0 0 4 ~ ~ 1 --....... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 4 9.3 1.6 4 100 0 0 5 3 8 5 21 6 10 3 3 22 43 17.3 43 100 0 0 Ll """' "' -<D O<D r ..r-~ a, a, "'0"' "ti " C. .. -o- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~~ "' [;]~ 2 ., - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 100 0.4 1 100 0 0 0 33 0 31 0 45 0 33 0 142 1 41 0 25 0 20 0 21 107 1 249 0.4 1 249 100 100 0 0 0 0 198 SW61 AVE Richard Ga rcia & Associates, Inc. 8065 NW 98 Street Hialeah Gardens, FL 33016 Phone : 305-362-0677 Fax: 305-675-6474 SW71 ST SW61 AVE Fil e Name Site Code Start Date Page No : SW 61 Ave_SW 71 St_PM : 00000000 : 11/4/2021 :2 SW71 ST Southbound Westbound Northb o und Eastbound S tart Time Ri ht Thru Left Peds "<• 1,-.., Ri ht Thru Le ft Peds ,_ re.:., Ri hi Thru Left Peds ,.. '"" Ri ht Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Analysis From 04 :00 PM to 05 :45 PM • Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04 :15 PM 04:15 PM 0 15 3 0 18 3 0 04 :30 PM 0 17 3 1 21 6 0 04 :45 PM 0 17 1 2 20 2 0 05 :00 PM 0 8 0 0 8 8 0 Total Volume 0 57 7 3 67 19 0 %ADD. Total 7 0 10 0 3 10 0 16 1 5 6 0 8 1 4 18 0 26 0 6 41 0 60 2 18 PHF .000 .838 .583 .375 .798 .594 .000 .569 .000 .577 .500 .750 ~\. t:-,~)J\ Out Tot.al c::::::m [JQ1) 0 3 :r Pads Peak Ho ur Data ~□ o~_t T ..J 02 North :;-t t- Peak Hour Beg ins at(),q :15 PM Cars -"' Trucks "O ., n. t-i Left Peds 0 2 C2fil CTifil Out Total 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 2 22 0 0 0 1 .000 .250 .688 .000 .000 .000 .250 u □~ :r ~ -"' r ~~~ Qd .,, Ill ;:; C. -Ill 0 0 31 0 45 0 33 1 41 1 150 .250 .833 199 Skill ed Nu rsing Facili ty Level l Traffic Study Figure 4: Site Traffic (Project Net Trips) -AM Peck Hour ~ a~ ... ~ Ent rance t ,t. 'ft ON (J) (J) ~ (f) ~ ~ ~ O') > .... < Q (I) ~ RICHARD GARCI A & A SSOC IATES, INC. Page 9 200 Skilled Nursing Facilit y Level 1 Traffic Stud y Figure 5: Site Traffic (Project Net Trips) -PM Peak Hour + SW 70St t~ R ICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES , INC. Page 10 201 607 5 Su nse t Dri v e Traffic Impact Stud y Appendix 5: Intersection & Roadway Capacity/ LOS Analysis ~~a1 RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Appendix -5 - 202 TABLE:A7 Level of Service (LOS) Summary -AM & PM Peak Hour Project Name : 6075 Sunset Drive Existing Condition AM Peak Hour m ■:r•. Location Intersection Overall Critical Approach TWSC Overall Critical Approach TWSC Control LOS Delay (sec) Approach LOS Delay (sec) LOS Delay (sec) Approach LOS Delay (sec) 1 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 59 Place Two-Way A 3.2 SB B 10.7 A 3.8 SB C 15.0 Stop 2 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 61 Avenue Two-Way A 0 .2 SB B 10.3 A 0.8 SB B 13.3 Stop 3 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 62 Avenue Traffic Signal D 51 .5 ---D 52.8 --- 4 SW 71 Street & SW 59 Place Two-Way A 0 .8 EB B 10.7 A 1.0 EB B 12.1 Stop 5 SW 71 Street & SW 61 Avenue Two-Way A 2.6 WB A 8.7 A 4.2 WB A 9.2 Stop Future Condition without Project AM Peak Hour ,,,■::,--=- Location Intersection Overall Crit ical Approach TWSC Overall Critical Approach TWSC Control LOS Delay (sec) Approach LOS Delay (sec) LOS Delay (sec) Approach LOS Delay (sec) 1 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 59 Place Two-Way A 3 .3 SB B 10.9 A 4.0 SB C 15.6 Stop 2 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 61 Avenue Two-Way A 0.2 SB B 10.4 A 0.9 SB B 13 .8 Stop 3 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 62 Avenue Traffic Signal D 52 .2 ---D 53 .7 -- - 4 SW 71 Street & SW 59 Place Two-Way A 0.8 EB B 10.8 A 1.0 EB B 12.4 Stop 5 SW 71 Street & SW 61 Avenue Two-Way A 2.5 WB A 8 .7 A 4 .0 WB A 9.3 Stop Future Condition with Project AM Peak Hour -11 1 ■::,:1:1:•i -Location Intersection Overall Critical Approach TWSC Overall Critical Approach TWSC Control LOS Delay (sec) Approach LOS Delay (sec) LOS Delay (sec) Approach LOS Delay (sec) 1 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 59 Pla ce Two-Way A 3.4 SB B 11 .0 A 4 .0 SB C 15.8 Stop 2 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 61 Avenue Two-Way A 0.4 SB B 10 .6 A 1.1 SB B 14 .2 Stop 3 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 62 Avenue Traffic Signal D 52.4 ---D 53 .8 --- 4 SW 71 Street & SW 59 Place Two-Way A 1.5 EB B 12.9 A 1.6 EB B 13 .7 Stop 5 SW 71 Street & SW 61 Avenue Two-Way A 3.8 WB A 9.2 A 4 .8 WB A 9.6 Stop 6 SW 71 Street & Main Driveway (OW 1) Two -Way A 4.4 NB A 9.0 A 4.0 NB A 9.1 Stop 7 SW 61 Avenue & Service Driveway (OW 2) Two-Way A 0 .2 WB A 8 .8 A 0.2 WB A 8.9 Stop 203 TABLE : AB Turn Lane Queue Lengths Summary -AM & PM Peak Hour Project Name: 6075 Sunset Drive Existing Condition 95 th Percentile Vehicle Queue (LF) .. . PM Peak Hour Location EBL WBL NBL SBL NBR SBR EBR WBR EBL WBL NBL SBL NBR SBR EBR WBR 1 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 59 Place 33 15 20 55 Tum Lane Storage Length (LF) (Approx .) 165 --165 2 SW 72 Street (S unset Drive) & SW 61 Avenue 3 18 T um Lane Storage Length (LF) (Approx .) ---- 3 SW 72 Stree t (Sunset Drive) & SW 62 Avenue 256 84 21 1 84 -0 206 82 296 84 0 Tum Lan e Storage Length (LF) (Aoorox .) >275* 125 250 165 125 >2 75* 125 250 165 --125 4 SW 71 Street & SW 59 Place 0 -3 0 3 -3 0 Tum Lane Storage Length (LF ) (Approx.) 75 160 -75 160 5 SW 71 Street & SW 61 Avenue 3 0 8 0 Tum Lane Storage Length (LF) (Approx .) -- Proposed Future Condition w/o Projec t 95th Percentile Veh icle Queue (LF) .. . PM Peak Hour Location EBL WBL NBL SBL NBR SBR EBR WBR EBL WBL NBL SBL NBR SBR EBR WBR 1 SW 72 Street (Su nset Drive) & SW 59 Place 35 -18 23 60 Tum Lane Storage Length (LF) (Approx .) 165 ----165 -- 2 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 61 Avenue 5 20 Tum Lane Storage Length (LF) (Approx.) -- 3 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 62 Avenue 264 88 215 84 0 214 90 301 84 0 Tum Lane Storage Length (LF) (Approx .) >275* 125 250 165 125 >275* 125 250 165 125 4 SW 71 Street & SW 59 Place 0 3 -0 3 3 0 Tum Lane Storage Length (LF) (Approx .) 75 160 -75 160 ---- 5 SW 71 Street & SW 61 Avenu e 3 0 --8 -0 Tum Lane Storage Length (LF) (Approx .) - Proposed Future Condi tion w/ Project 95th Percentile Vehicle Queue (LF) .. . PM Peak Hour Location EBL WBL NBL SBL NBR SBR EBR WBR EBL WBL NBL SBL NBR SBR EBR WBR 1 SW 72 Street (Sunset Drive) & SW 59 Place 38 18 23 60 Tum Lane Storage Length (LF) (Approx .) 165 --165 --- 2 SW 72 Street (Su nset Drive) & SW 6 1 Avenue -5 --25 T um Lane Storage Length (LF) (Approx .) ----- 3 SW 72 Street (Sun set Drive) & SW 62 Avenu e 271 93 215 84 -0 2 18 95 299 84 -0 Tum Lane Storage Length (LF) (Approx .) >275* 125 250 165 -125 >275* 125 250 165 --125 4 SW 7 1 Street & SW 59 Place 5 -3 0 -8 3 0 - Tum Lane Storage Length (LF) (Approx .) 75 160 -75 160 - 5 SW 71 Street & SW 61 Avenue 5 3 -10 0 Tum Lane Storage Length (LF) (Approx.) -- • Dual Left-Tum : Outs ide Lane approx. 400 ft . & Ins ide Lane approx . 275 ft . 204 ... ::, 0 :::c .:.:: C'CI Q) a. ~ <( C: 0 E "C C: 0 (..) Cl C: :.:: .!:!! )( w Q) > ·;:: C +" Q) C/J C: ::, rf) an t,.. 0 CD 205 HCM 6th TWSC 1: SW 72 St & SW 59 Pl ntersection Int De lay , s/veh 3.2 ovement EBL EBT WBT WBR Lane Configurations "'i tt tft Traffic Vol, veh/h 301 432 395 51 Future Vol, veh/h 301 432 395 51 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 Sign Contro l Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length 165 Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 Grade ,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 327 470 429 55 ajor/Minor Major1 Major2 Confl icting Flow All 484 0 0 Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy 4.14 Critical Hdwy Sig 1 Critica l Hdwy Sig 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1075 Stage 1 Stage 2 Pla toon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1075 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 ~pproach EB WB HCM Control Delay , s 4 0 HCM LOS inor Lane/Ma·or Mvmt EBL EBT WBT Capacity (veh/h) 1075 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.304 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.8 HCM Lane LOS A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.3 SBL SBR '{' 0 120 0 120 0 0 Stop Stop -None 0 0 0 92 92 2 2 0 130 Minor2 -242 -6.94 -3.32 0 759 0 0 -759 SB 10 .7 B WBRSBLn1 -759 -0.172 -10.7 B 0.6 6075 Sunset Drive Existing Condit ion -AM Peak Hour 206 HCM 6th TWSC 2 : SW 72 St & SW 61 Ave ntersec ti on Int Delay , s/veh 0.2 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations tt tf+ '(I Traffic Vol , veh/h 0 740 496 23 0 27 Future Vol , veh/h 0 740 496 23 0 27 Conflicting Peds , #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized -None -None -None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage , # -0 0 0 Grade ,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles , % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 804 539 25 0 29 ajar/M inor Majo r1 Ma jor2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 -282 Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy -6.94 Crit ical Hdwy Stg 1 Crit ical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy -3.32 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 0 715 Stage 1 0 0 Stage 2 0 0 Platoon blocked , % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -715 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 ~pproach WB SB HCM Control Delay , s 0 10 .3 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBT WBRSBLn 1 Capacity (veh/h) -715 HCM Lane VIC Ratio - 0.041 HCM Control Delay (s) -10 .3 HCM Lane LOS B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh} 0.1 6075 Sunset Drive Existing Cond ition -AM Peak Hour 207 HCM Sig na li zed Inte rsection Ca paci ty Ana lys is 6 075 Sunset Dri ve 3: SW 62 A ve & SW 7 2 St Existing Co ndit ion -AM Peak Hou r ~ .,> ---+-"'), i. -f ~ ~ ~ t ~ \. Movem ent EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SB Lane Co nfi gurations ?i~ tf+ ?i tt 7' ~ tf+ ~ Traffic Volume (vph ) 14 236 708 159 6 88 383 45 116 176 17 38 Fut ure Volume (vph ) 14 23 6 708 159 6 88 383 45 116 176 17 38 Idea l Flow (vphp l) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 190 0 1900 190 0 Tota l Lo st ti me ( s) 6.9 7.0 6.1 7.0 7.0 6.4 6.9 6.4 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flt Pro tected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Said . Flow (prot) 3433 3442 1770 3539 1583 1770 3492 1770 Flt Permi tt ed 0.95 1.00 0.26 1.00 1.00 0.20 1.00 0.62 Sa td. Fl ow (ee rm ) 3433 3442 489 3539 1583 366 3492 1153 Peak-h our fac tor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Ad j. Flow (v ph ) 15 259 778 175 7 97 42 1 49 127 19 3 19 42 RTOR Redu cti on (vp h) 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 22 0 3 0 0 Lane Gra ue Fl ow (veh ) 0 274 945 0 0 104 42 1 27 127 209 0 42 Turn Type Prot Prot NA pm+pt pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt Protected Phases 5 5 2 1 1 6 3 8 7 Permitted Pha ses 6 6 6 8 4 Actuated Gre en, G (s) 22.9 134 .2 136 .3 123.4 123.4 53 .3 39 .5 36 .5 Effective Green , g (s ) 22 .9 134 .2 136.3 123.4 123.4 53 .3 39 .5 36 .5 Actuat ed g/C Ra tio 0.10 0.61 0.6 2 0.56 0.5 6 0.24 0.18 0.17 Cl eara nce Time (s) 6.9 7.0 6.1 7.0 7.0 6.4 6.9 6.4 Vehicle Extens ion (s) 3.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 3.5 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 356 2095 377 198 1 886 20 1 625 21 1 v/s Rat io Prot c0 .08 c0 .27 0.02 0.12 c0 .05 0.06 0.01 v/s Ratio Pe rm 0.15 0.02 0.10 0.03 v/c Ra ti o 0.77 0.45 0.28 0.21 0.03 0.63 0.33 0.20 Uniform De la~. d1 96 .2 23 .2 17.7 24 .2 21.7 69 .6 79.0 78 .6 Prog ression Fac tor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Increment al Delay , d2 9.6 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.1 4.7 0.4 0.2 Dela y (s) 105 .8 23 .9 17.9 24 .5 21 .8 74.2 79.3 78 .8 Level of Service F C B C C E E E App roac h De lay (s) 42.2 23 .0 77.4 Approach LOS D C E ,ntersection Summa!}'. HCM 2000 Contro l De lay 51 .5 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Vol ume to Capac ity rat io 0.56 Ac tuated Cycle Length (s) 220 .4 Su m of lo st tim e (s ) 27.2 Intersec tio n Capa city Uti lization 68 .0% ICU Level of Se rv ice C Ana lysis Per iod (min) 15 C Crit ica l Lane Group 208 HCM Signalized Inte rsection Capac ity Analysis 3 : SW 62 Ave & SW 72 St ! .,' ovemen t SBT SBR Lane~onfigura tions ti. Traffic Volume (vph) 225 108 Fu ture Vo lum e (vp h) 225 108 Ideal Flow (v phpl ) 19 00 1900 Tota l Lost time (s) 6.9 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 Frt 0.95 Flt Pro tecte d 1.00 Said . Flow (pro !) 3367 Flt Perm itted 1.00 Said . Flow (pe rm) 3367 Peak-hour factor , PHF 0.91 0.91 Adj . Flow (v ph) 247 119 RTOR Redu ctio n (v ph ) 28 0 Lan e Gro up Flow (vph) 338 0 Turn Type NA Pro tec ted Phases 4 Pe rmitted Phases Actuated Green , G (s) 29.1 Effective Green , g (s) 29 .1 Ac tua ted g/C Ratio 0.1 3 Cl earance Time (s) 6.9 Vehi cl e Exten sion (s) 3.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 444 v/s Rati o Pro ! c0.10 v/s Ra ti o Perm v/c Ra tio 0.76 Un iform Delay , d1 92.3 Prog re ssion Fa ctor 1.00 Increment al Delay , d2 7.8 De lay (s) 100.1 Leve l of Se rvice F Ap proac h De lay (s) 97.9 Approach LOS F ntersection Summary 6075 Sunset D ri ve Existing Condition -AM Peak Hour 209 Ti mings 6 075 Sunset Drive 3: SW 62 Ave & SW 72 St Existing Condition -AM Peak Hour .,,. i. -( +-'-~ t '-. + --+- ane Grau EBL EBT WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Con fi gurations lf"i tf+ ~ tt .,, "i tf+ "i tf+ Traffic Vo lume (vph) 236 708 6 88 383 45 116 176 38 225 Future Volume (vph) 236 708 6 88 383 45 116 176 38 225 Turn Type Prat NA pm+pt pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 6 6 6 8 4 Detec tor Phase 5 2 1 1 6 6 3 8 7 4 Switch Phase Min imum Init ial (s) 5.0 7.0 5.0 5.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 Min imum Split (s) 11 .9 33 .0 11 .9 11 .9 33.0 33 .0 11 .4 30 .9 11 .4 30 .9 Tota l Split (s) 37.9 137.0 16 .1 16.1 115.0 115 .0 19.4 47 .9 19.4 47.9 Total Split(%) 17.2% 62.2% 7.3% 7.3% 52 .2% 52 .2% 8.8% 21.7% 8.8% 21.7% Yellow Time (s) 3.4 4.0 3.4 3.4 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.0 3.7 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 3.5 3.0 2.7 2.7 3.0 3.0 2.7 2.9 2.7 2.9 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Los t Time (s) 6.9 7.0 6.1 7.0 7.0 6.4 6.9 6.4 6.9 Lead /Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min Non e None C-Min C-Min None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 22.9 135 .5 138.5 124 .7 124 .7 52 .5 39 .5 36 .8 27 .8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.61 0.63 0.57 0.57 0.24 0.18 0.17 0.13 v/c Ratio 0.77 0.45 0.27 0.21 0.05 0.64 0.34 0.19 0.81 Control Delay 110 .7 24 .3 14 .0 25 .5 0.1 81 .6 78.6 65 .1 99 .3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total De lay 110.7 24 .3 14.0 25.5 0.1 81 .6 78.6 65 .1 99 .3 LOS F C B C A F E E F Approach De lay 43.6 21 .2 79 .7 95 .8 Approach LOS D C E F Intersection Summa!}'. Cycle Length : 220 .4 Actuated Cycle Length : 220.4 Offset: 4 (2%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBTL , Start of Yellow Natura l Cyc le: 90 Control Type : Actuated-Coordinated Max imum v/c Ratio: 0.81 Intersection Signal Delay : 51.7 Intersection LOS : D Inte rsection Capacity Uti lization 68 .0% ICU Leve l of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 I ■ ■ ■ ~ 03 1 + 04 '-.07 t 08 l 210 Queues 6075 Sunset Drive 3: SW62Ave&SW72 St Existing Condit ion -AM Peak Hour ~ 'f ,._ '-"\ t '. + --+ ane Groue !:BL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 274 953 104 421 49 127 212 42 366 v/c Ratio 0.77 0.45 0.27 0.21 0.05 0.64 0.34 0.19 0.81 Control Delay 110 .7 24.3 14 .0 25.5 0.1 81 .6 78 .6 65.1 99 .3 Queue De lay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 110.7 24.3 14 .0 25.5 0.1 81 .6 78.6 65.1 99 .3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 204 371 45 156 0 154 143 48 254 Queue Len gth 95th (ft) 256 515 84 228 0 211 182 84 311 Internal Link Dist (ft) 346 225 277 288 Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 70 105 205 120 Base Capac ity (vph) 482 2166 386 2005 947 202 670 252 652 Starvation Cap Re ductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.57 0.44 0.27 0.21 0.05 0.63 0.32 0.17 0.56 ntersection Summa!}'. 211 HCM 6th TWSC 4: SW 59 Pl & SW 71 St Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.8 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1' .,, 1' t f+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 6 36 317 114 15 Future Vol , veh/h 5 6 36 317 114 15 Conflicting Peds , #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None -None Storage Length 50 0 110 Veh in Median Storage , # 0 0 0 Grade ,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 6 7 40 356 128 17 ajor/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 573 137 145 0 0 Stage 1 137 Stage 2 436 Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Crit ical Hdwy Sig 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 481 911 1437 Stage 1 890 Stage 2 652 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 468 911 1437 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 468 Stage 1 865 Stage 2 652 16.pproach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay , s 10.7 0.8 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT Capacity (veh/h) 1437 -468 911 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.028 - 0.012 0.007 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 -12 .8 9 HCM Lane LOS A B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 0 SBR 6075 Sunset Drive Existing Condition -AM Peak Hour 212 HCM 6th TWSC 5 : SW 61 Ave & SW 71 St Jntersecti on Int Delay , s/veh 2.6 ovement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Con fi gurations ¥ ~ 4 Traffic Vol , veh/h 6 12 13 3 15 53 Future Vol , veh/h 6 12 13 3 15 53 Conflicting Peds , #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None - None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage , # 0 0 0 Grade ,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 81 81 81 81 81 81 Heavy Vehicles , % 2 2 2 2 2 2 MvmtFlow 7 15 16 4 19 65 a·or/M inor Mino r1 Ma·o r1 Ma·or2 Conflicting Flow All 121 18 0 0 20 0 Stage 1 18 Stage 2 103 Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 -4.12 Crit ical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Cr itical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 -2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 874 1061 -1596 Stage 1 1005 Stage 2 921 Platoon blocked , % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 864 1061 -1596 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 864 Stage 1 1005 Stage 2 910 ~pproach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay , s 8.7 0 1.6 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvm t NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) -986 1596 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.023 0.012 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.7 7.3 0 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 6075 Sunset Drive Existing Condition -AM Peak Hour 213 .. ::::, 0 :::c ..::0: (II Q) Cl.. ~ < I ..... u Q) ·o .. Cl.. 0 -?: C 0 ~ "C C 0 () Q) .. ::::, ..... ::::, LL Q) > ·;:: 0 ..... Q) (/) C ::s Cl) I.I) ,.._ 0 <D ~327 Jr37 214 HCM 6th TWSC 1 : SW 72 St & SW 59 Pl Intersection Int Delay , s/veh 3.3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR Lane Configurations ~ ++ tf+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 310 445 409 53 Future Vol , veh/h 310 445 409 53 Con fl ic ting Peds , #/hr 0 0 0 0 Sign Con trol Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length 165 Veh in Median Storage , # -0 0 Gra de ,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 Heavy Veh icles , % 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 337 484 445 58 ajar/Minor Major1 Major2 Conflict ing Flow All 503 0 0 Stage 1 Stage 2 Cr itical Hdwy 4.14 Critical Hdwy Sig 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1058 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon bloc ked , % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1058 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 1\pproach EB WB HCM Contro l Delay , s 4.1 0 HCM LOS inor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT Capacity (veh/h) 1058 HCM Lane V/C Ra ti o 0.3 18 HCM Con tro l De lay (sj 10 HC M Lane LOS A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.4 SBL SBR '(I 0 124 0 124 0 0 Stop Stop -None 0 0 0 92 92 2 2 0 135 Minor2 -252 -6.94 -3.32 0 748 0 0 -748 SB 10 .9 B WBRSBLn1 -748 -0.18 -10.9 B 0.7 6075 Sunset Drive Future Condit ion w/o Project -AM Peak Hour 215 HCM 6th TWSC 2: SW 72 St & SW 61 Ave )ntersection Int Delay , s/veh 0.2 ovement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configu rations tt t~ 7' Traffic Vol , veh/h 0 762 513 24 0 31 Future Vol , veh/h 0 762 513 24 0 31 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized -None -None -None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage , # . 0 0 0 Grade ,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles , % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 828 558 26 0 34 Ma'or/Minor Ma 'or1 Ma·or2 Minor2 Conflict ing Flow All 0 0 . 292 Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy . 6.94 Critical Hdwy Sig 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy . 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 704 Stage 1 0 0 Stage 2 0 0 Platoon blocked , % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver . 704 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 ~pproach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 10.4 HCM LOS B inor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) . 704 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.048 HCM Control Delay (s) . 10.4 HCM Lane LOS B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 6075 Sunset Drive Future Condition w/o Project -AM Peak Hour 216 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6075 Sunset Drive 3: SW 62 Ave & SW 72 St Future Condition w/o Project -AM Peak Hour ~ .,} .... i; 'f ,._ 4-... ~ t !' \. -+ ovement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SB ~ Lane Configurations ?i"i tf+ ?i tt .,, "i tf+ "i Traffic Volume (vph) 14 247 729 164 6 92 397 46 120 183 18 39 Future Volume (vph) 14 247 729 164 6 92 397 46 120 183 18 39 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 6.9 7.0 6.1 7.0 7.0 6.4 6.9 6.4 Lane Util . Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Said. Flow (pro!) 3433 3442 1770 3539 1583 1770 3491 1770 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 0.19 1.00 0.61 Said. Flow (eerm) 3433 3442 466 3539 1583 356 3491 1143 Peak-hour facto r, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph} 15 27 1 801 180 7 101 436 51 132 201 20 43 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 23 0 3 0 0 Lane Graue Flow (veh) 0 286 973 0 0 108 436 28 132 218 0 43 Turn Type Prat Prat NA pm+pt pm+Qt NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt Protected Phases 5 5 2 1 1 6 3 8 7 Permitted Phases 6 6 6 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s} 23 .6 132.5 134.9 121.5 121 .5 54.5 40 .7 37.2 Effecti ve Green , g (s) 23 .6 132 .5 134.9 121.5 121 .5 54.5 40 .7 37.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.60 0.61 0.55 0.55 0.25 0.18 0.17 Clearance Time (s) 6.9 7.0 6.1 7.0 7.0 6.4 6.9 6.4 Vehicle Extens ion (s) 3.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 3.5 2.0 Lane GrQ Cap (vph) 367 2069 364 1950 872 205 644 213 v/s Ratio Prat c0.08 c0.28 0.02 0.12 c0.05 0.06 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.16 0.02 0.11 0.03 v/c Ra tio 0.78 0.47 0.30 0.22 0.03 0.64 0.34 0.20 Uniform Delay, d1 95.9 24.4 18.5 25 .3 22 .6 68.9 78.1 78 .0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incrementa l Delay, d2 10 .0 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.1 5.1 0.4 0.2 Delay (s} 105 .9 25.2 18.7 25 .6 22 .7 74 .0 78 .5 78.2 Level of Service F C B C C E E E Approach Delay (s} 43.4 24.1 76 .8 Approach LOS D C E :Intersection Summa!}'. HCM 2000 Control Delay 52.2 HCM 2000 Leve l of Service D HCM 2000 Vo lume to Capacity ratio 0.58 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 220.4 Sum of lost time (s) 27.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.4% ICU Leve l of Service C Analysis Period (min} 15 C Critical Lane Group 217 HCM Signa li ze d Inte rsect io n Ca paci ty Analysis 3: SW 62 Ave & SW 72 St + .,' Movement SBT SBR Lane~onfigu rations t~ Traffic Volume (vph) 232 111 Future Volume (vph) 232 111 Ideal Flow (vphp l) 1900 1900 Tota l Lost time (s) 6.9 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 Frt 0.95 Flt Protected 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 3367 Flt Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3367 Peak-hour factor , PHF 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 255 122 RTOR Reduction (vph) 28 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 349 0 Turn Type NA Protec ted Phases 4 Perm itted Phases Actuated Green , G (s) 29.8 Effective Green, g (s) 29.8 Ac tuated g/C Ratio 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 6.9 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 455 v/s Ratio Prot c0 .10 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.77 Uniform Delay , d1 92.0 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 7.8 Delay (s) 99.8 Level of Service F Approach Delay (s) 97.6 Approach LOS F ~ntersection Summary 6075 Sunset Driv e Fut ure Conditi on w/o Project -AM Peak Hour 218 Ti mings 6075 Sunset Dri ve 3: SW 62 Ave & SW 72 St Fu tu re Condi tion w/o Proj ect -AM Peak Hour .,,> -+ i.;: -f ,.._ '-~ t '. + , ane Groue EB L EBT WBU WB L WBT WBR NBL SBL SBT La ne Configu ra tions ~, tf+ ~ tt .,, "i "i tf+ Traffic Volume (vP.h) 247 729 6 92 397 46 120 39 232 Future Vol ume (vp h) 247 729 6 92 397 46 120 39 232 Turn Type Prot NA pm+pt pm +pt NA P.fil!JL.P m+p t pm+pt NA Pro tecte d Phases 5 2 1 1 6 3 7 4 Permitted Phases 6 6 6 8 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 1 6 6 3 8 7 4 Sw itch Phase Minimum Initia l (s) 5.0 7.0 5.0 5.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 Minim um Split (s) 11.9 33.0 11 .9 11 .9 33 .0 33.0 11.4 30.9 11.4 30.9 Tota l Spli t (s) 37 .9 137 .0 16.1 16.1 115.0 115.0 19.4 47 .9 19.4 47 .9 Total Sp li t(%) 17.2% 62.2% 7.3% 7.3% 52 .2% 52 .2% 8.8% 21.7% 8.8% 21 .7% Yellow Time (s) 3.4 4.0 3.4 3.4 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.0 3.7 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 3.5 3.0 2.7 2.7 3.0 3.0 2.7 2.9 2.7 2.9 Lo st Time Ad just (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tota l Lost Time (s) 6.9 7.0 6.1 7.0 7.0 6.4 6.9 6.4 6.9 Lea d/Lag Lead Lag Le ad Lea d Lag La g Lead La g Le ad Lag Le ad-Lag Optim ize? Yes Yes Yes Ye s Ye s Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Reca ll Mode None C-Min None No ne C-M in C-M in None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 23.6 133.8 137.1 122 .8 122.8 53.7 40 .7 37 .6 28.5 Ac tuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.61 0.62 0.56 0.56 0.24 0.18 0.17 0.13 v/c Ratio 0.78 0.47 0.29 0.22 0.05 0.65 0.34 0.20 0.81 Contro l De la y 110 .5 25 .6 14.8 26 .6 0.1 81 .4 77.9 64.3 99.3 Queue De lay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 110.5 25 .6 14.8 26 .6 0.1 81 .4 77.9 64.3 99.3 LOS F C 8 C A F E E F Approach Delay 44.8 22.2 79.2 95.7 Approach LOS D C E F nterse ction Summ a!}'. Cyc le Length: 220.4 Actua ted Cycle Le ngth: 220 .4 Offset: 4 (2%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WB TL , Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordina ted Max imum vie Ratio : 0.81 Intersection Signal De lay : 52.4 Intersection LOS: D Inters ect ion Ca pacit y Utiliza tio n 69.4% ICU Lev el of Service C Analysis Period (m in) 15 Splits and Phases : 3: SW 62 Ave & SW 72 St l . I ■ ■ ■ 219 Queues 6075 Sunset Drive 3: SW 62 Ave & SW 72 St Future Condition w/o Project -AM Peak Hour ~ --+ 'f ,.._ ' "\ t \. ! ane Groue EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 286 981 108 436 51 132 221 43 377 v/c Ratio 0.78 0.47 0.29 0.22 0.05 0.65 0.34 0.20 0.81 Control Delay 110 .5 25.6 14.8 26 .6 0.1 81.4 77.9 64 .3 99.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 To tal Delay 110 .5 25.6 14.8 26.6 0.1 81.4 77.9 64 .3 99 .3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 212 395 48 166 0 159 14 8 49 263 Queue Length 95th (ft) 264 54 7 88 243 0 215 188 84 320 Interna l Lin k Dist (ft) 346 225 277 288 Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 70 105 205 120 Base Ca i1 acity (vph) 482 215 1 372 1982 93 7 205 677 255 652 Starvation Cap Reduc tn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.59 0.46 0.29 0.22 0.05 0.64 0.33 0.17 0.58 220 HC M 6th TWSC 4: SW 59 Pl & SW 71 St ntersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.8 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configura tions "i 7' "i t f+ Traffic Vol , veh/h 5 6 37 327 11 7 15 Future Vol, veh/h 5 6 37 327 117 15 Confl icting Peds , #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None -None Storage Length 50 0 110 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89 Heavy Veh icles , % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 6 7 42 367 131 17 Ma·or/Minor Minor2 Ma·or1 Ma'or2 Confl icting Flow All 591 140 148 0 0 Stage 1 140 Stage 2 451 Critica l Hdwy 6.42 6.2 2 4.12 Critica l Hdwy Sig 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 Follow -up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 470 908 1434 Stage 1 887 Stage 2 642 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 456 908 1434 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 456 Stage 1 861 Stage 2 642 l\pproach EB NB SB HCM Control De lay, s 10 .8 0.8 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT Capacity (veh/h) 1434 -456 908 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.029 - 0.012 0.007 HCM Contro l Delay (s) 7.6 13 9 HCM Lane LOS A B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 0 SBR 6075 Sunset Drive Futu re Condition w/o Project -AM Peak Hour 221 HCM 6th TWSC 5: SW 61 Ave & SW 71 St ntersection Int Delay , s/veh 2.5 ovement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations ¥ f. 4' Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 12 13 3 15 58 Future Vol , veh/h 6 12 13 3 15 58 Conflicting Peds , #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None -None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage , # 0 0 0 Grade ,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 81 81 81 81 81 81 Heavy Vehicles ,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 7 15 16 4 19 72 ajor/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Confl icting Flow All 128 18 0 0 20 0 Stage 1 18 Stage 2 110 Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 -4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 -2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 866 1061 -1596 Stage 1 1005 Stage 2 915 Platoon blocked , % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 856 1061 -1596 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 856 Stage 1 1005 Stage 2 904 pproach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay , s 8.7 0 1.5 HCM LOS A inor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) -983 1596 HCM Lane VIC Ratio -0.023 0.012 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.7 7.3 0 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 6075 Sunset Drive Future Condition w/o Project -AM Peak Hour 2226075 Sunset Drive Future Condition w/ Project -AM Peak Hour ~ + c..,,w OON -.J SW 72 St 223 HCM 6th TWSC 1 : SW 72 St & SW 59 Pl ntersection Int Delay , s/veh 3.4 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR Lane Configurations "'i ++ tf+ Traffic Vol , veh/h 323 445 416 61 Future Vol , veh/h 323 445 416 61 Conflicting Peds , #/hr 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length 165 Veh in Median Storage , # -0 0 Grade ,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles , % 2 2 2 2 MvmtFlow 351 484 452 66 a'or/M inor Ma 'or1 Ma·or2 Conflicting Flow All 518 0 0 Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy 4.14 Critical Hdwy Sig 1 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1044 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1044 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 ~pproach EB WB HCM Control Delay , s 4.3 0 HCM LOS inor Lane/Ma·or Mvmt EBL EBT WBT Capacity (veh/h) 1044 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.336 HCM Control Delay (s) 10.2 HCM Lane LOS B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.5 SBL SBR .,, 0 125 0 125 0 0 Stop Stop -None 0 0 0 92 92 2 2 0 136 Minor2 -259 -6.94 -3.32 0 740 0 0 -740 SB 11 B WBRSBLn1 -740 -0.184 11 B 0.7 6075 Sunset Drive Future Cond ition w/ Project -AM Peak Hour 224 HC M 6t h T WSC 2 : SW 72 St & SW 61 Ave Jn tersecti on Int Del ay, s/veh 0.4 Movem en t EB L EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Config urati ons ++ tf+ 7' Traffic Vol, ve h/h 0 775 514 31 0 47 Future Vo l, veh/h 0 77 5 514 31 0 47 Conflict ing Peds, #/h r 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Co ntrol Free Free Free Fre e Stop Stop RT Channelized -None -None -None Storag e Length 0 Veh in Medi an Storage, # -0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Ve hicle s, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvm t Flow 0 842 559 34 0 51 Ma jor/M inor Maior 1 Ma io r2 Minor2 Co nflictin g Flow All 0 0 -297 Stage 1 Stage 2 Critica l Hdwy -6.94 Cr itica l Hdwy Sig 1 Critica l Hdwy Sig 2 Fo llow-u p Hdwy -3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneu ver 0 0 699 St age 1 0 0 Stage 2 0 0 Platoon blocke d, % Mov Cap-1 Maneu ver -699 Mov Cap-2 Mane uver Stage 1 Sta ge 2 IA, roac h EB WB SB HCM Con tro l Delay, s 0 0 10.6 HC M LOS B ,Minor Lane/Maj or Mvmt EBT WB T WBR SB Ln1 Cap acity (veh/h) -699 HCM Lan e V/C Ratio -0.073 HCM Control De lay (s) -10.6 HC M La ne LOS B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 6075 Suns et D rive Futur e Co ndition w/ Project -AM Peak Ho ur 225 HCM Signa lized Inte rs ecti o n Capa city A nalys is 6075 Suns et Drive 3: SW 62 Ave & SW 72 St Future Cond ition w/ Project -AM Peak Hour :!I .,> -+ ~ I; 'f +--\.. ~ f ~ ',. Movement EBU EB L EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SB Lane Con fi gu rati ons lf'i t~ ~ tt 'f 't t~ 't Tra ffi c Vo lume (v~h ) 14 253 738 164 6 98 408 46 120 187 22 39 Future Volume (vph) 14 253 738 164 6 98 408 46 120 187 22 39 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 To tal Lost time (s) 6.9 7.0 6.1 7.0 7.0 6.4 6.9 6.4 Lane Util. Facto r 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 Fl t Prote cted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Sa id. Flow (prot} 3433 3443 1770 3539 1583 1770 3484 1770 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.24 1.00 1.00 0.19 1.00 0.61 Said . Flow (eerm) 3433 3443 456 3539 1583 356 3484 1134 Peak-hou r factor , PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 15 278 811 180 7 108 448 51 132 205 24 43 RTOR Reduc tion (vph) 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 23 0 4 0 0 Lane Graue Flow (veh) 0 293 983 0 0 115 448 28 132 225 0 43 Turn Type Prot Pro! NA pm +Rl pm+pt m+pt NA pm+pt Protected Phases 5 5 2 1 1 3 8 7 Permitted Phases 6 6 6 8 4 Actuated Gree n, G (s ) 24.1 13 1.6 135 .3 121.0 121.0 54 .5 40.7 37 .2 Effective Green , g (s} 24.1 131 .6 135 .3 121.0 12 1.0 54.5 40 .7 37 .2 Actuated glC Ratio 0.11 0.60 0.6 1 0.55 0.55 0.25 0.18 0.17 Clearance Time (s) 6.9 7.0 6.1 7.0 7.0 6.4 6.9 6.4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 3.5 2.0 Lane Gr Cap (vph} 375 2055 365 1942 869 205 643 212 vis Ra tio Prot c0.09 c0.29 0.02 0.13 c0 .05 0.06 0.01 vis Ratio Perm 0.17 0.02 0.11 0.03 vlc Ra tio 0.78 0.48 0.32 0.23 0.03 0.64 0.35 0.20 Un iform Delay, d1 95 .6 25 .0 18.6 25 .7 22 .8 68 .9 78 .3 78.0 Prog ression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental De lay, d2 10.1 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.1 5.1 0.4 0.2 Delay (s} 105 .7 25 .8 18.8 25.9 22 .9 74 .0 78 .7 78.2 Leve l of Service F C B C C E E E Approach De lay (s) 44 .1 24.3 77.0 Approach LOS D C E 'intersecti on Summa!}'. HCM 2000 Control De lay 52 .4 HCM 2000 Leve l of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capac ity ratio 0.58 Actuated Cycle Leng th (s) 220.4 Sum of lost time (s} 27 .2 Intersec ti on Capacity Utilization 70 .0% ICU Level of Service C Analys is Period (min) 15 C Critica l Lane Group 226 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SW 62 Ave & SW 72 St ! ~ Movement SBT SBR Lane,onfigurations tf+ Traffic Volume (vph) 232 11 1 Future Volume (vph) 232 111 Idea l Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 6.9 Lane Util . Factor 0.95 Frt 0.95 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd . Flow (prot) 3367 Flt Perm itted 1.00 Satd . Flow (perm) 3367 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 Ad j. Flow (vph) 255 122 RTOR Reduction (vph) 28 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 349 0 Turn Ty P.e NA Protected Phases 4 Perm itted Phases Actuated Green , G (s) 29.8 Effec ti ve Green , g (s) 29 .8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 6.9 Veh icle Extension (s) 3.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 455 v/s Ratio Prot c0 .10 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Rat io 0.77 Uniform Delay , d1 92 .0 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 7.8 De lay (s) 99 .8 Level of Serv ice F Approach Delay (s) 97 .6 Approach LOS F ntersection Summary 6075 Sunset Drive Future Condition w/ Project -AM Peak Hour 227 Timings 6075 Sunset Drive 3: SW 62 Ave & SW 72 St Future Condition w/ Project -AM Peak Hour __.,. ---+-~ f +-' ~ t \. + Lane Groue EBL EBT WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations ~~ tf+ ~ tt 1' ~ tf+ ~ tf+ Traffic Volume (vph) 253 738 6 98 408 46 120 187 39 232 Futu re Vo lume (vph) 253 738 6 98 408 46 120 187 39 232 Turn Type Prot NA pm+pt Qm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 6 6 6 8 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 1 6 6 3 8 7 4 Switch Phase Mi nimum Initial (s) 5.0 7.0 5.0 5.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 Minimum Sp lit (s) 11 .9 33.0 11 .9 11.9 33 .0 33.0 11.4 30.9 11.4 30.9 Total Split (s} 37 .9 137.0 16.1 16.1 115.0 115 .0 19.4 47 .9 19.4 47 .9 Total Split(%) 17 .2% 62.2% 7.3% 7.3% 52 .2% 52 .2% 8.8% 21.7% 8.8% 21 .7% Yellow Time (s} 3.4 4.0 3.4 3.4 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.0 3.7 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 3.5 3.0 2.7 2.7 3.0 3.0 2.7 2.9 2.7 2.9 Lost Time Ad just (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tota l Lost Time (s) 6.9 7.0 6.1 7.0 7.0 6.4 6.9 6.4 6.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode No ne C-Mi n None None C-Min C-Min None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 24 .1 132.9 137 .5 122.3 122 .3 53 .7 40 .7 37.6 28 .5 Actuated g/C Rat io 0.11 0.60 0.62 0.55 0.55 0.24 0.18 0.17 0.13 v/c Ratio 0.78 0.48 0.31 0.23 0.05 0.65 0.35 0.20 0.81 Control Delay 110.2 26.3 15.0 27 .0 0.1 81 .4 77 .8 64 .3 99.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tota l De lay 110.2 26.3 15.0 27.0 0.1 81.4 77.8 64.3 99.3 LOS F C B C A F E E F Approach Delay 45.4 22 .5 79 .1 95 .8 Approach LOS D C E F ntersection Summa!)'. Cyc le Length: 220.4 Actuated Cyc le Length: 220 .4 Offset: 4 (2%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBTL, Start of Yellow Natu ral Cycle : 90 Control Ty Qe: Actuated -Coordinated Max imum v/c Ratio: 0.81 Intersection Signal De lay : 52 .6 Intersection LO S: D Inte rsect ion Capacity Uti lization 70.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min} 15 1 Sp:::r ::2 ~SW62Ave&SW72S1- ,! 0 s ~ --06 (Rl l 228 Queues 6075 Sunset Drive 3: SW 62 Ave & SW 72 St Future Condition w/ Project -AM Peak Hour /' --+ 'f +-' "" t '-. + Lane Graue EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 293 991 115 448 51 132 229 43 377 v/c Ratio 0.78 0.48 0.31 0.23 0.05 0.65 0.3 5 0.20 0.81 Control Delay 110.2 26 .3 15 .0 27 .0 0.1 81.4 77.8 64 .3 99 .3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total De lay 110.2 26.3 15.0 27.0 0.1 81.4 77.8 64 .3 99 .3 Que ue Length 50th (ft) 218 405 52 173 0 159 154 49 263 Queue Le ngth 95t h (ft) 271 561 93 251 0 215 194 84 320 Interna l Link Dist (ft) 346 225 277 288 Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 70 105 205 120 Base Capacity (vph) 482 2147 372 1976 935 205 676 253 652 Starva tion Cap Reduc tn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.61 0.46 0.31 0.23 0.05 0.64 0.34 0.17 0.58 ntersection Summa!l'. 229 HCM 6th TWSC 4: SW 59 Pl & SW 71 St Intersection In t Delay , s/veh 1.5 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Confi gu rat ions "i .,, "i t ~ Traffic Vol, veh/h 22 7 58 327 117 23 Fu ture Vol , veh/h 22 7 58 327 117 23 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None -None Storage Length 50 0 110 Veh in Median Storage , # 0 0 0 Grade ,% 0 0 0 Peak Hou r Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 25 8 65 367 131 26 Ma·or/Minor Minor2 Ma·or1 Ma·or2 Conflict ing Flow All 641 144 157 0 0 Stage 1 144 Stage 2 497 Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 439 903 1423 Stage 1 883 Stage 2 611 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 419 903 1423 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 419 Stage 1 842 Stage 2 611 ~pproach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay , s 12 .9 1.2 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT Capacity (veh/h) 1423 -419 903 HCM Lane VIC Rat io 0.046 -0.059 0.009 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 -14.1 9 HCM Lane LOS A B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.2 0 SBR 6075 Sunset Drive Future Condition w/ Project -AM Peak Hour 230 HCM 6th TWSC 5: SW 61 Ave & SW 71 St Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.8 ovement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations ¥ f. 4' Traffic Vol, veh/h 21 17 14 9 31 59 Future Vol, veh/h 21 17 14 9 31 59 Conflicting Peds , #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None -None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage , # 0 0 0 Grade ,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 81 81 81 81 81 81 Heavy Veh icles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 26 21 17 11 38 73 ajar/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 172 23 0 0 28 0 Stage 1 23 Stage 2 149 Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 -4.12 Critica l Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 -2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 818 1054 -1585 Stage 1 1000 Stage 2 879 Platoon blocked , % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 798 1054 -1585 Mov Cap-2 Mane uver 798 Stage 1 1000 Stage 2 857 ~pproach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9.2 0 2.5 HCM LOS A inor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h} -895 1585 HCM Lane V/C Ratio -0.052 0.024 HCM Contro l De lay (s) 9.2 7.3 0 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh} 0.2 0.1 6075 Sunset Drive Future Condition w/ Project -AM Peak Hour 231 HCM 6t h TWSC 6 : DW1 & SW 71 St ntersection Int Delay , s/veh 4.4 ,Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configu rations t+ 4 V Traffic Vol, veh/h 18 22 29 18 20 18 Future Vol , veh/h 18 22 29 18 20 18 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Contro l Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized -None -None -None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade ,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles , % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 20 24 32 20 22 20 ajar/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 44 0 116 32 Stage 1 32 Stage 2 84 Critical Hdwy -4.12 -6.42 6.22 Cr itica l Hdwy Sig 1 -5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 -5.42 Follow-up Hdwy -2.218 -3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver -1564 -880 1042 Stage 1 -99 1 Stage 2 -939 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver -1564 -862 1042 Mov Ca p-2 Maneuver -862 Stage 1 -991 Stage 2 919 ~pproach EB WB NB HCM Control De lay, s 0 4.5 9 HCM LOS A inor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 939 -1564 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.044 -0.02 HCM Contro l Delay (s) 9 7.3 0 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1 6 075 S unset Drive Future Condition w/ Project -AM Peak Hour 232 HCM 6th TWSC 7: SW 61 Ave & DW2 ntersection Int De lay , s/veh 0.2 ovement WBL WBR Lane Configurations ¥ Traffic Vo l, veh/h 1 1 Future Vol, veh/h 1 1 Confl icting Peds , #/hr 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop RT Channelized -None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage , # 0 Grade,% 0 Pea k Hour Factor 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 1 Major/Minor Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 113 25 Stage 1 25 Stage 2 88 Critica l Hdwy 6.42 6.22 Critica l Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critica l Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 884 1051 Stage 1 998 Stage 2 935 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 883 1051 Mov Cap-2 Maneuve r 883 Stage 1 998 Stage 2 934 pproach HCM Control De lay , s 8.8 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT Capacity (veh/h} HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) NBT NBR SBL SBT f+ 4' 22 1 1 79 22 1 1 79 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Free -None -None 0 0 0 0 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 24 1 1 86 Major1 Major2 0 0 25 0 -4.12 -2.218 -1589 -1589 SB 0 0.1 NBRWBLn1 SBL SST -960 1589 -0.002 0.001 8.8 7.3 0 A A A 0 0 6075 Sunset Drive Future Condition w/ Project -AM Peak Hour 233 ... :::, 0 :I: .lo:: «I Q) a. :iii: a. C: 0 :;; ~ C: 0 u C) C: ~ ·x w Q) > ·;: Cl .... Q) 1/) C: :::, en It) ..... 0 !D 234 HCM 6th TWSC 1: SW 72 St & SW 59 Pl ntersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.8 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR Lane Configurations ~ tt tt. Traffic Vol, veh/h 178 360 670 32 Future Vol, veh/h 178 360 670 32 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length 165 Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 Grade ,% 0 0 Peak Hour Fac tor 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 185 375 698 33 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Conflict ing Flow All 731 0 0 Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy 4.14 Critical Hdwy Sig 1 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 869 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Ma neuv er 869 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 IApproach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 3.4 0 HCM LOS inor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT Capacity (veh/h) 869 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.213 HCM Control Delay (s) 10 .3 HCM Lane LOS B HCM 95th %ti le Q(veh) 0.8 SBL SBR .,, 0 263 0 263 0 0 Stop Stop -None 0 0 0 96 96 2 2 0 274 Minor2 -366 -6.94 -3.32 0 631 0 0 -631 SB 15 C WBRSBLn1 -631 -0.434 15 C 2.2 6075 Sunset Drive Existing Condition -PM Peak Hour 235 H C M 6th TWSC 2: SW 72 St & SW 6 1 Ave Intersection Int Delay , s/veh 0.8 ovement EBL E!BT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations tt t~ ., Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 536 924 9 0 99 Future Vol, veh/h 0 536 924 9 0 99 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized -None -None -None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 547 943 9 0 101 a·or/M inor Ma·or1 Ma·or2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 -476 Stage 1 Stage 2 Cri tica l Hdwy -6.94 Critica l Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 Follow-up Hdwy -3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 535 Stage 1 0 0 Stage 2 0 0 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -535 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 IA.pproach EB WB SB HC M Control Delay , s 0 0 13 .3 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Ma ·or Mvmt EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) -535 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.189 HCM Control Delay (s) -13 .3 HCM Lane LOS B HCM 95th %ti le Q(veh) 0.7 6075 Sunset Drive Existing Condition -PM Peak Hour 236 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6075 Sunset Drive 3: SW 62 Ave & SW 72 St Existing Condition -PM Peak Hour ~ _,,;. --+-" ~ "f +-' "'\ t I" ~ Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SB L! La ne Configurations ~"i tf+ ~ tt .,, "i tf+ "i Traffic Volume (vph) 85 119 469 97 6 83 940 16 180 183 30 44 Future Volume (v ph) 85 119 469 97 6 83 940 16 180 183 30 44 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Los t time (s) 6.9 7.0 6.1 7.0 7.0 6.4 6.9 6.4 Lane Util . Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Said. Flow (pro t) 3433 3448 1770 3539 1583 1770 3464 1770 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.43 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.61 Said. Flow (ee rm) 3433 3448 804 3539 1583 224 3464 1144 Pea k-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Ad j. Flow (vph) 88 123 484 100 6 86 969 16 186 189 31 45 RTOR Reduction (vph } 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 7 0 6 0 0 Lane Graue Flow (veh) 0 211 577 0 0 92 969 9 186 214 0 45 Turn Type Prot Prat NA pm+pt pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt Protec ted Phases 5 5 2 1 1 6 3 8 7 Perm itted Phases 6 6 6 8 4 Actuated Green , G (s) 18.9 132.4 129.9 121 .3 121.3 59.4 45.5 34.4 Effective Green, g (s) 18.9 132.4 129 .9 121 .3 121.3 59.4 45.5 34 .4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.60 0.59 0.55 0.55 0.27 0.21 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 6.9 7.0 6.1 7.0 7.0 6.4 6.9 6.4 Veh icle Extension (s) 2.6 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 3.5 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 294 2071 511 1947 871 243 715 199 v/s Rat io Prat c0 .06 0.17 0.01 c0.27 c0 .09 0.06 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 0.01 c0 .12 0.03 v/c Rat io 0.72 0.28 0.18 0.50 0.01 0.77 0.30 0.23 Uniform De lay , d1 98.2 21 .1 19.6 30.7 22.4 67 .6 74 .0 80 .5 Prog ress ion Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 7.7 0.3 0.1 0.9 0.0 12 .1 0.3 0.2 Delay (s) 105.8 21.4 19.7 31.6 22.4 79.7 74.3 80 .7 Level of Serv ice F C B C C E E F Approach De lay (s) 43.8 30.4 76.8 Approach LOS D C E • ntersection Summa!)'. HCM 2000 Contro l Delay 52.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity rat io 0.60 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 220 .4 Sum of lost time (s) 27 .2 In ters ection Capacity Utilizatio n 76.4% ICU Level of Service D AnaJysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group 237 HCM Sig nali ze d Inte rsection Capac ity Ana lys is 3 : SW 62 Ave & SW 72 St + ,ct' Movement SBT SBR Lane,onfigurati on s tf+ Traffic Volume (vph) 172 224 Fu ture Volume (vph) 172 224 Ideal Fl ow (vp hpl) 19 00 190 0 Tot al Lost tim e (s) 6.9 Lane Util . Factor 0.95 Frt 0.92 Flt Protected 1.00 Sa id . Flow (pro t) 32 39 Flt Perm itted 1.00 Said . Flow (perm) 3239 Peak-hour factor , PHF 0.97 0.97 Ad j. Flow (vph) 177 231 RTOR Reduction (vph) 107 0 Lane Gro up Flow (vph) 301 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 4 Permitted Phases Act uated Green , G (s ) 26 .9 Effectiv e Green , g (s) 26 .9 Act uated g/C Rat io 0.12 Cl eara nc e Time (s) 6.9 Veh icle Exten sion (s) 3.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 39 5 v/s Ratio Pro t 0.0 9 v/s Ratio Pe rm v/c Ra ti o 0.76 Uniform Delay , d1 93 .6 Progression Fac tor 1.0 0 Incremental Delay , d2 8.7 De lay (s) 102 .3 Leve l of Serv ice F Approach Delay (s) 100 .2 Approach LOS F Jntersection Summary 6075 S u nse t Drive Ex isting Condi tion -PM Pea k Hou r 238 Timings 6075 Sunset Drive 3: SW 62 Ave & SW 72 St Exi sting Condition -PM Peak Hour .,;. t.; ~ ,._ ' ~ t \. + ---+ ~ane Grou~ EBL EBT WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SB L SBT Lane Configurations ?f 9' tf+ l!i tt 7' "i tf+ "i tf+ Traffic Volume (vph ) 119 469 6 83 940 16 180 183 44 172 Future Volume (vph) 119 469 6 83 940 16 180 183 44 172 Turn Type Prot NA pm+pt pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA pm +pt NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 6 6 6 8 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 6 3 8 7 4 Switch Phase Mi nimu m Initial (s) 5.0 7.0 5.0 5.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 11 .9 33 .0 11.9 11 .9 33 .0 33 .0 11.4 30 .9 11 .4 30 .9 Total Split (s ) 22.9 133.0 22 .1 22 .1 13 2.0 132 .0 22.4 42 .9 22.4 42 .9 Total Sp lit(%) 10.4% 60.3% 10 .0% 10 .0% 59 .9% 59.9% 10 .2% 19.5 % 10.2% 19 .5% Yellow Time (s) 3.4 4.0 3.4 3.4 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.0 3.7 4.0 All-Red Ti me (s) 3.5 3.0 2.7 2.7 3.0 3.0 2.7 2.9 2.7 2.9 Lost Ti me Ad jus t (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 To tal Lost Time (s) 6.9 7.0 6.1 7.0 7.0 6.4 6.9 6.4 6.9 Lead /L ag Lead Lag Lead Lea d Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Op ti mize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min None None C-Min C-Min None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 18 .9 133 .8 132 .1 122.6 122.6 58 .6 45 .5 34 .7 25 .6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.61 0.60 0.56 0.56 0.27 0.21 0.16 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.72 0.28 0.18 0.49 0.02 0.77 0.31 0.22 0.84 Control Delay 111 .7 21 .5 15 .2 32 .6 0.1 86 .8 72.3 61 .8 82 .3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 111 .7 21 .5 15 .2 32 .6 0.1 86 .8 72.3 61.8 82.3 LOS F C B C A F E E F Approach Delay 45 .4 30.6 79 .0 80 .3 Approach LOS D C E F Jntersecti on Summa!}'. Cycle Length : 220.4 Actuated Cyc le Length: 220.4 Offse t: 64 (29 %), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WB TL, Start of Yell ow Natural Cycle : 90 Contro l Type : Ac tuated-Coordinated Max imum v/c Ratio : 0.84 Intersection Signal Delay : 50.4 Intersection LOS : D Intersect ion Capac ity Ut ilizatio n 76.4% IC U Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Spli ts and Phases : 3: SW 62 Ave & SW 72 St I\:: I ■ ■ : ■ 239 Queues 6075 Sunset Drive 3: SW 62 Ave & SW 72 St Existing Cond ition -PM Peak Hour .,,;. -+ '( +-4-... ~ t '-. + ane Groue EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 211 584 92 969 16 186 220 45 408 v/c Ratio 0.72 0.28 0.18 0.49 0.02 0.77 0.31 0.22 0.84 Contro l Delay 111 . 7 21 .5 15.2 32.6 0.1 86.8 72 .3 61.8 82 .3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tota l De lay 111 . 7 21 .5 15 .2 32 .6 0.1 86 .8 72 .3 61 .8 82 .3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 157 201 44 451 0 224 142 50 222 Queue Length 95th (ft ) 206 286 82 600 0 296 180 84 282 Internal Link Dist (ft) 346 225 277 288 Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 70 105 205 120 Base Capacity (vph) 300 2125 579 2076 962 242 720 263 630 Starva tion Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spil lback Cap Redu ctn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Ca p Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.70 0.27 0.16 0.4 7 0.02 0.77 0.31 0.17 0.65 Intersecti on Summa!}'. 240 HC M 6t h TWSC 4 : SW 59 Pl & SW 7 1 St jnters ecti on Int Delay, s/veh Move me nt EBL EB R NBL NBT SBT SB R Lane Config ura tio ns "'i .,, "'i t f+ Traffic Vol, ve h/h 17 9 23 218 244 23 Future Vol , veh/h 17 9 23 218 24 4 23 Co nfl icti ng Ped s, #/h r 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Cont ro l Sto p Stop Fr ee Free Free Fre e RT Channe lized - None -None -Non e Stora ge Length 50 0 110 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Gra de,% 0 0 0 Pe ak Hou r Facto r 86 86 86 86 86 86 Heavy Ve hicl es, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvm t Fl ow 20 10 27 253 284 27 aj ar/M ino r Minor2 Ma jo r1 Majo r2 Con fli ct ing Flo w All 605 298 311 0 0 Stage 1 298 St ag e 2 307 Critica l Hdwy 6.4 2 6.22 4.12 Critica l Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Cr itica l Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 Fo ll ow-up Hdwy 3.51 8 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 46 1 74 1 1249 Sta ge 1 753 Stage 2 746 Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Ma ne uver 451 74 1 1249 Mov Cap-2 Man euve r 45 1 St age 1 736 Stag e 2 746 ~pproach SB HCM Con tro l De lay, s 12.1 0.8 0 HCM LO S B ino r Lan e/M ajor Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBL n2 SBT Ca pacit y (veh/h) 1249 451 74 1 HCM La ne V/C Ratio 0.021 0.044 0.01 4 HCM Control De lay (s) 7.9 13 .3 9.9 HCM La ne LOS A B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1 0 SBR 6075 Sunse t Drive Existing Cond ition -PM Pe ak Hour 241 HCM 6th TWSC 5: SW 61 Ave & SW 71 St ntersection Int Delay , s/veh 4.2 ovement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT La ne Configurations V f+ 4' Traffic Vol , veh/h 41 19 18 2 7 57 Future Vol, veh/h 41 19 18 2 7 57 Conflict ing Peds , #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None -None Storage Length 0 Veh in Med ian Storage , # 0 0 0 Grade ,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 83 83 83 83 83 83 Heavy Vehicles , % 2 2 2 2 2 2 MvmtFlow 49 23 22 2 8 69 ajor/M inor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflict ing Flow All 108 23 0 0 24 0 Stage 1 23 Stage 2 85 Cri ti cal Hdwy 6.42 6.22 -4.12 Critical Hdwy Sig 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 Fo ll ow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 889 1054 -1591 Stage 1 1000 Stage 2 938 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 885 1054 -1591 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 885 Stage 1 1000 Stage 2 933 16.pproach SB HCM Control Delay , s 9.2 0.8 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) -932 1591 HCM Lane V/C Ratio -0.078 0.005 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.2 7.3 0 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 6075 Sunset Drive Existing Condi ti on -PM Peak Hour 242 ... ::::l 0 I ~ ra Q) a. ~ a. I ..... (.J Q) ·e a. 0 "j C: 0 E "C C: 0 (.) Q) ... ::::l ..... ::::l LL ..... Q) (/) C: ::::l (J) LO ,..._ 0 (0 251~...., 24~ C/) T"" r--- s C/) ~225 ¥"24 ...., C/) N r-- ~ 243 HCM 6th TWSC 1 : SW 72 St & SW 59 Pl ilntersection Int Delay, s/veh 4 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR Lane Configurations "i ++ tf+ Traffic Vol , veh/h 183 371 692 33 Future Vol, veh/h 183 371 692 33 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None Storage Length 165 Veh in Median Storage , # -0 0 Grade ,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 191 386 721 34 ajar/Minor Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 755 0 0 Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy 4.14 Critica l Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 851 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 851 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 pproach EB WB HCM Control Delay , s 3.5 0 HCM LOS inor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT Capacity (veh/h) 851 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.224 HCM Control Delay (s) 10.4 HCM Lane LOS B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.9 SBL SBR 'f' 0 271 0 271 0 0 Stop Stop -None 0 0 0 96 96 2 2 0 282 Minor2 -378 -6.94 -3.32 0 620 0 0 -620 SB 15 .6 C WBRSBLn1 -620 -0.455 -15 .6 C 2.4 6075 Sunset Drive Future Condition w/o Project -PM Peak Hour 244 HCM 6th TWSC 2: SW 72 St & SW 61 Ave ,Intersection In t Delay , s/veh 0.9 ovement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations tt +~ .,, Traffic Vol , veh/h 0 552 954 9 0 111 Future Vol , veh /h 0 552 954 9 0 111 Conflict ing Peds , #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channel ized -None -None -None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage , # -0 0 0 Grade ,% 0 0 0 Pea k Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 563 973 9 0 113 aja r/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 -491 Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy -6.94 Critical Hdwy Sig 1 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 Follow-up Hdwy -3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 523 Stage 1 0 0 Stage 2 0 0 Platoon blocked , % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -523 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 !Approach SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 13 .8 HCM LOS B inor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) -523 HCM Lane V/C Ratio -0.217 HCM Control Delay (s ) -13.8 HCM Lane LOS B HCM 95 th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 6075 Sunset Drive Future Cond ition w/o Project -PM Peak Hour 245 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6075 Sunset Drive 3: SW 62 Ave & SW 72 St Future Condition w/o Projec t -PM Peak Hour ~ / "'), i; 'f +-4.... ~ t !' \. -+ Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SB U Lane Configurations Zi~ tf. Zi tt ,, ~ tf. ~ Traffic Volume (vph) 88 126 483 100 6 89 974 16 185 191 31 45 Future Volume (vph) 88 126 483 100 6 89 974 16 185 191 31 45 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 6.9 7.0 6.1 7.0 7.0 6.4 6.9 6.4 Lane Util . Facto r 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.0 0 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (pro!) 3433 3448 1770 3539 1583 1770 3465 1770 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.61 Satd . Flow (eerm) 3433 3448 786 3539 1583 226 3465 1134 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 91 130 498 103 6 92 1004 16 191 197 32 46 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 7 0 5 0 0 Lane Groue Flow (veh) 0 221 594 0 0 98 1004 9 191 224 0 46 Turn Type Pro! Pro! NA pm+pt pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt Protected Phases 5 5 2 1 1 6 3 8 7 Permitted Phases 6 6 6 8 4 Actuated Green , G (s) 19.9 129.4 126 .7 117.7 117 .7 62 .0 48 .1 35 .8 Effective Green , g (s) 19 .9 129 .4 126.7 117.7 117.7 62 .0 48 .1 35 .8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.59 0.57 0.53 0.53 0.2 8 0.22 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 6.9 7.0 6.1 7.0 7.0 6.4 6.9 6.4 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.6 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 3.5 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 309 2024 492 1889 845 254 756 205 v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 0.17 0.01 c0.28 c0 .09 0.06 0.01 vis Ratio Perm 0.11 0.01 c0 .12 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.72 0.29 0.20 0.53 0.01 0.75 0.30 0.22 Uniform Delay , d1 97 .5 22 .7 21 .1 33.4 24 .1 65 .8 72.0 79.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay , d2 7.2 0.4 0.1 1.1 0.0 10 .6 0.3 0.2 De lay (s) 104 .7 23.1 21 .2 34.5 24.1 76.4 72.3 79 .6 Leve l of Service F C C C C E E E Approach Delay (s) 45.0 33 .2 74 .1 Approach LOS D C E ntersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 53.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.62 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 220.4 Sum of lost time (s) 27 .2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.3% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group 246 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SW 62 Ave & SW 72 St + .; Movement SST SBR Lane,:;on fi gurations tf+ Tra ffi c Vo lume (vph) 177 23 1 Future Volume (vph) 177 231 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Total Los t time ( s) 6.9 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 Frt 0.92 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3238 Flt Permitted 1.00 Satd . Flow {perm) 3238 Peak-hour factor , PHF 0.97 0.97 Adj . Flow (vph) 182 238 RTOR Reduc ti on (vph) 98 0 Lane Group Flow {vph) 322 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 4 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 28 .3 Effective Green , g (s ) 28.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 Clearance Time (s) 6.9 Veh icle Extension (s ) 3.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 415 v/s Ratio Prot 0.10 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.78 Uniform Delay, d1 93 .0 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay , d2 9.1 Delay (s) 102.1 Level of Serv ice F Approach De lay (s) 99 .9 Approach LOS F jntersection Summary 6075 Sunset Drive Future Condition w/o Project -PM Peak Hour 247 Timings 6075 Sunset Drive 3: SW 62 Ave & SW 72 St Future Condit ion w/o Project -PM Peak Hour .,,. -+ i.;: 'f -+--\.. ~ t \.. + Lane Grau EBL EBT WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations ?f'i tf+ l!i tt 7' llj tf+ llj tf+ Tra ffi c Volume (vph ) 126 483 6 89 974 16 185 191 45 177 Future Volume (vph) 126 483 6 89 974 16 185 191 45 177 Turn Type Prat NA pm +pt pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 6 6 6 8 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 1 6 6 3 8 7 4 Switch Phase Min imum Ini ti al (s) 5.0 7.0 5.0 5.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 11 .9 33 .0 11.9 11.9 33 .0 33.0 11.4 30 .9 11 .4 30 .9 To tal Split (s) 22 .9 133.0 22.1 22.1 13 2.0 132.0 22.4 42 .9 22 .4 42 .9 To tal Spl it (%) 10 .4% 60 .3% 10.0% 10 .0% 59 .9% 59 .9% 10.2% 19 .5% 10.2% 19.5 % Yellow Time (s) 3.4 4.0 3.4 3.4 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.0 3.7 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 3.5 3.0 2.7 2.7 3.0 3.0 2.7 2.9 2.7 2.9 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.9 7.0 6.1 7.0 7.0 6.4 6.9 6.4 6.9 Lead /L ag Lead La g Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Op ti mize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min None None C-Min C-M in None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 19 .9 130.7 128 .9 119.0 119.0 61 .2 48 .1 36.2 27.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.59 0.58 0.54 0.54 0.28 0.22 0.16 0.12 v/c Rat io 0.71 0.29 0.20 0.53 0.02 0.75 0.30 0.22 0.85 Co ntro l De lay 110.3 23 .1 16 .3 35 .5 0.1 83 .2 70.4 60 .1 84 .9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 110.3 23.1 16 .3 35 .5 0.1 83 .2 70.4 60.1 84 .9 LOS F C B D A F E E F Ap proach Delay 46 .5 33.3 76 .2 82 .5 Approach LOS D C E F ntersection Summa Cycle Length : 220.4 Ac tu ated Cycl e Length : 220.4 Offse t: 64 (29 %), Referenced to phase 2:EB T and 6:WBTL , Start of Yellow Natural Cycle : 90 Control Type : Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio : 0.85 Intersection Signal De lay : 51.6 Intersec ti on LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.3 % ICU Level of Service D Ana lysis Period (min) 15 Spl its and Phases: 3: SW 62 Ave & SW 72 St 248 Queues 6075 Sunset Drive 3: SW 62 Ave & SW 72 St Future Condition w/o Project -PM Peak Hour .,,. -+ """ +--\.. ~ t \. + Lane Grou~ EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 221 601 98 1004 16 191 229 46 420 v/c Ratio 0.71 0.29 0.20 0.53 0.02 0.75 0.30 0.22 0.85 Contro l De lay 110 .3 23 .1 16.3 35.5 0.1 83 .2 70.4 60 .1 84.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 To tal De lay 110.3 23.1 16 .3 35 .5 0.1 83 .2 70.4 60.1 84 .9 Queue Length 50th (ft) 164 216 49 494 0 227 145 50 239 Queue Length 95th (ft) 214 304 90 647 0 301 184 84 298 Internal Link Dist (ft) 346 225 277 288 Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 70 105 205 120 Base Capac ity (vph) 312 2091 555 2049 951 253 761 270 622 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback CaP, Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.71 0.29 0.18 0.49 0.02 0.75 0.30 0.17 0.68 · ntersection Summa!l'. 249 HCM 6th TWSC 4: SW 59 Pl & SW 71 St 1lntersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement EBL EBR NB L NBT SB T SBR Lane Configurations " .,, " t ~ Traffic Vol , veh/h 18 9 24 225 251 24 Future Vol, veh/h 18 9 24 225 251 24 Conflicting Peds , #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None -None Storage Length 50 0 110 Veh in Med ian Storage , # 0 0 0 Grade ,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86 Heavy Veh icles , % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 21 10 28 262 292 28 Ma 'or/Minor Minor2 Ma 'or1 Ma 'or2 Conflicting Flow All 624 306 320 0 0 Stage 1 306 Stage 2 318 Critica l Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Cri tica l Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critica l Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 449 734 1240 Stage 1 747 Stage 2 738 Platoon blocked , % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 439 734 1240 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 439 Stage 1 730 Stage 2 738 ~pproach SB HCM Contro l Delay , s 12.4 0 HCM LOS B inor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SST Capacity (veh/h) 1240 -439 734 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.023 - 0.048 0.014 HCM Control Delay (s) 8 -13.6 10 HCM Lane LOS A B B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1 0 SBR 6075 Sunset Drive Future Condition w/o Project -PM Peak Hour 250 HCM 6t h TWSC 5: SW 61 Ave & SW 71 St ntersection Int De lay, s/ve h 4 Movement WB L WBR NBT NBR SBl SBT Lane Configura tions V ~ 4' Traffic Vol , veh/h 42 20 19 2 7 68 Fu ture Vol, veh/h 42 20 19 2 7 68 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None -None Storage Length 0 Veh in Med ian Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade ,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Fact or 83 83 83 83 83 83 Heavy Ve hicles , % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 51 24 23 2 8 82 ,Major/Minor Minor1 Majo r1 Major2 Conflict ing Flow All 122 24 0 0 25 0 Stage 1 24 Stage 2 98 Crit ical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 -4.12 Cri tica l Hdwy Sig 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 Fo llow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 -2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 873 1052 -1589 Stage 1 999 Stage 2 926 Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuve r 869 1052 -1589 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 869 Stage 1 999 Stage 2 921 ~pproach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9.3 0 0.7 HCM LOS A inor Lane/Major Mvmt SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) -921 1589 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.081 0.005 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.3 7.3 0 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th %ti le Q(veh) 0.3 0 60 75 Su nse t Drive Future Cond ition w/o Project -PM Peak Hour 2516075 Sunset Drive SW 72 St Future Condition w/ Project -PM Peak Hour ~ + WN o:>N 01 252 HCM 6th TWSC 1: SW 72 St & SW 59 Pl 1lntersection Int Delay, s/veh 4 .Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR Lane Configurations 'I ++ +tt Traffic Vol , veh/h 192 371 697 38 Future Vol, veh/h 192 371 697 38 Conflicting Peds , #/hr 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free RT Channe lized -None -None Storage Length 165 Veh in Median Storage , # -0 0 Grade,% 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles , % 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 200 386 726 40 .Major/Mino r Ma jor1 Major2 Confl icting Flow All 766 0 0 Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hd wy 4.14 Cr itical Hdwy Sig 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 843 Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 843 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 id.pproach EB WB HCM Control Delay , s 3.6 0 HCM LOS inor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT Capacity (veh/h) 843 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.237 HCM Control Delay (s) 10 .6 HCM Lane LOS B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.9 SBL SBR .,, 0 272 0 272 0 0 Stop Stop -None 0 0 0 96 96 2 2 0 283 Mino r2 -383 -6.94 -3.32 0 615 0 0 -615 SB 15 .8 C WBRSBLn1 -615 -0.461 -15 .8 C 2.4 6075 Sunset Drive Future Condition w/ Project -PM Peak Hour 253 HCM 6th TWSC 2: SW 72 St & SW 61 Ave ntersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.1 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations tt tf+ .,, Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 561 955 14 0 129 Future Vol , veh/h 0 561 955 14 0 129 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized -None -None -None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 0 Grade ,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvrnt Flow 0 572 974 14 0 132 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 -494 Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy -6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwx Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy -3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 521 Stage 1 0 0 Stage 2 0 0 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -521 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 1A roach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 14.2 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Ma'or Mvmt EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) -521 HCM Lane V/C Ratio -0.253 HCM Control Delay (s) -14 .2 HCM Lane LOS B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 6075 Sunset Drive Future Condition w/ Project -PM Peak Hour 254 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6075 Sunset Drive 3: SW 62 Ave & SW 72 St Future Condition w/ Project -PM Peak Hour ~ ~ --+ .... I_: ~ +-'-~ t ~ '-. Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SB U Lane Configurations ?f'i +~ ~ ++ .,, 'It +~ 'It Traffic Vo lume (vph) 88 130 489 100 6 96 986 16 185 194 34 45 Future Volume (vph) 88 130 489 100 6 96 986 16 185 194 34 45 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 6.9 7.0 6.1 7.0 7.0 6.4 6.9 6.4 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Fri 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Said . Flow (pro!) 3433 3449 1770 3539 1583 1770 3460 1770 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.61 Said. Flow (eerm) 3433 3449 779 3539 1583 231 3460 1128 Peak-hour factor , PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Ad j. Flow (vph) 91 134 504 103 6 99 1016 16 191 200 35 46 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 8 0 6 0 0 Lane Graue Flow (veh) 0 225 599 0 0 105 1016 8 191 229 0 46 Turn Type Prat Prat NA pm+pt pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt Protected Phases 5 5 2 1 1 6 3 8 7 Permitted Phases 6 6 6 8 4 Actuated Green , G (s) 20 .3 128 .4 126 .1 116.7 116 .7 62 .6 48.7 36.0 Effective Green, g (s) 20 .3 128.4 126.1 116 .7 116.7 62.6 48.7 36 .0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.58 0.57 0.53 0.53 0.28 0.22 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 6.9 7.0 6.1 7.0 7.0 6.4 6.9 6.4 Veh icle Extension (s) 2.6 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 3.5 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 316 2009 487 1873 838 259 764 206 v/s Ratio Prat c0 .07 0.17 0.01 c0 .29 c0.09 0.07 0.01 vis Ratio Perm 0.11 0.01 c0.12 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.71 0.30 0.22 0.54 0.01 0.74 0.30 0.22 Uniform Delay, d1 97.2 23.2 21.4 34.2 24.5 65.3 71.6 79.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 7.0 0.4 0.1 1.1 0.0 9.1 0.3 0.2 Delay (s) 104.2 23.6 21.5 35.4 24.5 74.4 71.9 79 .4 Level of Service F C C D C E E E Approach Delay (s) 45.4 33.9 73.0 Approach LOS D C E 1lntersection Summa!}'. HCM 2000 Control Delay 53.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volum e to Capacity ratio 0.63 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 220.4 Sum of lost time (s) 27 .2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 78 .7% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group 255 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SW 62 Ave & SW 72 St + -ct' ovement SBT SBR Lane,onfigurations tf+ Traffic Volume (vph) 177 231 Future Volume (vph) 177 231 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 6.9 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 Frt 0.92 Flt Protected 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 3238 Flt Permitted 1.00 Said. Flow (perm) 3238 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 Adj . Flow (vph) 182 238 RTOR Reduction (vph) 96 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 324 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 4 Permitted Phases Actuated Green , G (s) 28.5 Effective Green, g (s) 28 .5 Actua ted g/C Rat io 0.13 Clearance Time (s) 6.9 Vehicle Extension {s) 3.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 418 v/s Ratio Prot 0.10 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.7 8 Uniform Delay, d1 92.9 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 9.0 De lay (s) 101 .9 Leve l of Service F Approach Delay (s) 99 .6 Approach LOS F ntersection Summary 6075 Sunset Drive Future Condition w/ Project -PM Peak Hour 256 Timings 6075 Sunset Drive 3: SW 62 Ave & SW 72 St Future Condition w/ Project • PM Peak Hour .,,;. --+ r.: 'f +--\.. ~ t \. + Lane Groue EBL EBT WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations lf'i tl+ ?i tt 7' "i tf+ "i tf+ Traffic Volume (vph) 130 489 6 96 986 16 185 194 45 177 Future Volume (vph) 130 489 6 96 986 16 185 194 45 177 Turn Type Prot NA pm+pt pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 6 6 6 8 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 1 6 6 3 8 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 7.0 5.0 5.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.9 33.0 11 .9 11 .9 33 .0 33 .0 11.4 30.9 11.4 30.9 Total Split (s) 22.9 133.0 22 .1 22 .1 132.0 132.0 22.4 42.9 22.4 42 .9 Total Split(%) 10.4% 60 .3% 10 .0% 10.0% 59 .9% 59 .9% 10 .2% 19.5% 10.2% 19 .5% Ye llow Time (s) 3.4 4.0 3.4 3.4 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.0 3.7 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 3.5 3.0 2.7 2.7 3.0 3.0 2.7 2.9 2.7 2.9 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.9 7.0 6.1 7.0 7.0 6.4 6.9 6.4 6.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min None None C-Min C-Min None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 20 .3 129 .7 128 .3 118 .0 118.0 61.8 48 .7 36 .3 27 .2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.59 0.58 0.54 0.54 0.28 0.22 0.16 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.71 0.30 0.21 0.54 0.02 0.74 0.31 0.22 0.85 Control Delay 109.9 23.6 16 .5 36 .2 0.1 81.3 69.9 59 .9 85 .3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 109.9 23 .6 16.5 36 .2 0.1 81.3 69.9 59 .9 85 .3 LOS F C B D A F E E F Approach Delay 46.9 33.9 75.0 82.8 Approach LOS D C E F jntersection Summa!}'. Cycle Length: 220.4 Actuated Cycle Length: 220.4 Offset: 64 (29%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBTL , Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.85 Intersection Signal Delay : 51 .8 Intersection LOS : D In tersection Capacity Utilization 78 .7% ICU Leve l of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Spl its and Phases : 3: SW 62 Ave & SW 72 St I />0 , _, "'05 +-06 ) I ·■ ■ i ■ 257 Queues 6075 Sunset Drive 3: SW 62 Ave & SW 72 St Future Condition w/ Project -PM Peak Hour ..> -+ -f +-'-"\ t \. + .Lane Grou~ EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 225 607 105 1016 16 191 235 46 420 vie Ratio 0.71 0.30 0.21 0.54 0.02 0.74 0.31 0.22 0.85 Control Delay 109.9 23 .6 16 .5 36.2 0.1 81.3 69.9 59 .9 85.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total De lay 109 .9 23.6 16.5 36.2 0.1 81.3 69 .9 59 .9 85 .3 Queue Length 50th {ft) 167 221 53 506 0 226 148 50 241 Queue Le ngth 95th (ft} 218 308 95 658 0 299 187 84 300 Internal Link Dist (ft) 346 225 277 288 Turn Bay Len gth (ft) 100 70 10 5 205 120 Base Capacity (vph) 316 2083 548 2044 948 258 770 270 620 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.71 0.29 0.19 0.50 0.02 0.74 0.31 0.17 0.68 ntersection Summa!)'. 258 HCM 6th TWSC 4: SW 59 Pl & SW 71 St Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.6 Movement ESL EBR NBL NBT SST SBR Lane Configurations 't .,, 't t t. Traffic Vol , veh/h 37 10 38 225 251 31 Future Vol, veh/h 37 10 38 225 251 31 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized • None -None -None Storage Length 50 0 110 Veh in Median Storage , # 0 0 0 Grade ,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 43 12 44 262 292 36 a·or/Minor Minor2 Ma ·or1 Ma·or2 Conflicting Flow All 660 310 328 0 0 Stage 1 310 Stage 2 350 Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critica l Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 428 730 1232 Stage 1 744 Stage 2 713 Platoon blocked , % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 413 730 1232 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 413 Stage 1 717 Stage 2 713 ~pproach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 13.7 1.2 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SST Capacity (veh/h) 1232 . 413 730 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.036 · 0.104 0.016 HCM Control Delay (s) 8 . 14.7 10 HCM Lane LOS A B B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.3 0 SBR 6075 Sunset Drive Future Condition w/ Project • PM Peak Hour 259 HCM 6th TWSC 5: SW 61 Ave & SW 71 St • ntersection Int Delay , s/veh 4.8 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations ¥ f+ 4 Traffic Vol , veh/h 59 27 20 6 18 69 Future Vol , veh/h 59 27 20 6 18 69 Conflicting Peds , #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None -None -None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage , # 0 0 0 Grade ,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 83 83 83 83 83 83 Heavy Vehicles , % 2 2 2 2 2 2 MvmtFlow 71 33 24 7 22 83 a·or/Minor Minor1 Ma·or1 Ma·or2 Conflicting Flow All 155 28 0 0 31 0 Stage 1 28 Stage 2 127 Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 -4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 -2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 836 1047 -1582 Stage 1 995 Stage 2 899 Platoon blocked , % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 823 1047 -1582 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 823 Stage 1 995 Stage 2 886 ~pproach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9.6 0 1.5 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) -882 1582 HCM Lane V/C Ratio -0.117 0.014 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.6 7.3 0 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 6075 Sunset Drive Future Condition w/ Project -PM Peak Hour 260 HCM 6th TWSC 6: DW1 & SW 71 St Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4 ovement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations f+ 4 ¥ Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 17 24 59 27 22 Future Vol , veh/h 7 17 24 59 27 22 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channel ized -None -None -None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade ,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles , % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 8 18 26 64 29 24 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflict ing Flow All 0 0 26 0 133 17 Stage 1 17 Stage 2 -116 Critical Hdwy -4.12 -6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Sig 1 -5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 -5.42 Follow-up Hdwy -2.218 -3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver -1588 -861 1062 Stage 1 -1006 Stage 2 -909 Platoon blocked , % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -1588 -846 1062 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver -846 Stage 1 -1006 Stage 2 -894 ~pproach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay , s 0 2.1 9.1 HCM LOS A inor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 931 -1588 HCM Lane VIC Rat io 0.057 -0.016 HCM Con trol Delay (s) 9.1 7.3 0 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.1 6075 Sunset Drive Future Condition w/ Project -PM Peak Hour 261 HCM 6th TWSC 7: SW 61 Ave & DW2 ,ntersection Int Delay , s/veh 0.2 ovement WB L WBR Lane Configurations ¥ Tra ffi c Vol , veh /h 1 1 Future Vol , veh/h 1 1 Conflicting Peds , #/hr 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop RT Channelized -None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage , # 0 Grade ,% 0 Pea k Hour Factor 92 92 Heavy Vehicles , % 2 2 Mvm t Flow 1 1 ,Majo r/Minor Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 168 28 Stage 1 28 Stage 2 140 Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Sig 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 822 1047 Stage 1 995 Stage 2 887 Platoon blocked , % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 821 1047 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 821 Stage 1 995 Stage 2 886 ~pproach WB HCM Contro l Delay , s 8.9 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Ma·or Mvmt NBT Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) NBT NBR SBL SBT f+ 4 25 1 1 127 25 1 1 127 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Free -None -None 0 0 0 0 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 27 1 1 138 Major1 Major2 0 0 28 0 -4.12 -2.218 -1585 -1585 NB SB 0 0.1 NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT -920 1585 -0.002 0.001 8.9 7.3 0 A A A 0 0 6075 Sunset Drive Future Condition w/ Project -PM Peak Hour 262 1 2 Roadway Location SW 72 Street between SW 59 Place & AM (Sunset Drive) SW62Avenue SW 72 Street between SW 59 Place & (Sunset Drive) SW62 Avenue TABLE:A9 ROADWAY LINK ANALYSIS -AM & PM PEAK HOUR EXISTING CONDITION & FUTURE CONDITION Project Name: 6075 Sunset Drive 3 .. 5 LOS/Volume Existing Available Background Growth Standard Two-Way Capacity LOS @ 1.0% -3 Year Build Volume Out (2024) LOSE/ 2,888 VPH 1,291 1,597 D 39 County-4LD LOSE/ 2,888 VPH 1,594 1,294 D 48 County-4LD 6 7 8 Committed Project Net Proposed Available Trips Trips (2024) Traffic Volume Capacity (2024) 5 30 1,365 1,523 11 28 1,681 1,207 Notes: 1 Roadway Name 2 Location 3 Roadway I Volume Standard • 4 Existing Roadway Segment Two-Way Volume, Available Capacity & LOS .. 5 Backgroung Traffic Growth by 2025 6 Committed Trips 7 Project Net Trips by 2024 8 Proposed Roadway Segment Two-Way Volume, Available Capacity & LOS by Year 2024 • LOS / Volume Standard based on the generalized tables from the FDOT Quality/ LOS Handbook. •• Existing roadway volumes were obtained from TMC's at SW 72 Street & SW 62 Avenue. LOS D D 263 TABLE 4 Generalized Peak Hour Two-Way Volumes for Florida's Urbanized Areas 1 January 2020 1 u.1• 1 :I:~ !•■■!.I~ d g.1_1 ;;iiinHa m l"ll:.1'11'~ IUII 11 ~:a.., -, ST ATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS C lass I (40 mph or higher posted speed limit) Lanes Median B C D E 2 Undivided * 1,510 1,600 •• 4 Divided * 3,420 3,580 ** 6 Divided * 5,250 5,390 ** 8 Divided * 7,090 7,210 •• C lass II (35 mph or sl ower posted speed limit) Lanes Median B C D E 2 Und ivided * 660 1,330 1,410 4 D ivided * 1,3 10 2,920 3 040 6 Divided * 2,090 4,500 4,590 8 Divided * 2,880 6,060 6,130 . · on-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments Lanes 2 2 Ylult i :-.1ulti - (Alter corre spondi ng state vol ume s by the indicated percent.) Non-State Si gnalized Roadways -10 % Median & Turn Lane Adjustments Exc lusive Exclusive Median Lefi Lanes Right Lanes Divided Yes No Undivided 'o No Und ivide d Yes No Undivided 0 0 --Ye s One-Way Facility Adjustment Multiply the correspondi ng two-d irectional vo lum es in this table by 0.6 BICYCLE MODE2 Adjustment Factors +5% -20% -5% -25% -,-5% (Multiply vehicle vo lumes shown below by numb er of direc tional roadway lanes to determine r.vo -way maximu m service volumes .) Paved Shoulde r/Bicycle Lane Coverage 0 -49 % 50-8 4% 85-100% B C D * 260 680 I 90 600 1,770 830 1,700 >1,770 PEDESTRIAN MODE2 (:vlult ip ly vehicle volumes shown below by nu mber of E 1,770 >1,770 ** directiona l roa dway lan es to determine two-way maximum service volumes .) Sidewalk Coverage B C D 0-49% * * 250 50-84% * 150 780 85-100% 340 960 1,560 BUS M ODE (Scheduled Fixed Routc)3 (Bu ses in peak hour in peak direction) S idewalk Coverage B C D 0-84% >5 ?:4 ?:3 85-100% > 4 ?: 3 ?: 2 QUA LI TY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK E 850 1,420 >1,770 E ?: 2 ?: I '" ,~· ,:n 1=-ii u:ni~~:.•~•-i1 ■iS.'4 FREEWAYS Core Urbanized Lanes B C D E 4 4,050 5,640 6,800 7,420 6 5,960 8,310 10 ,220 11,150 8 7,8 40 10 ,960 13,620 14,850 10 9,800 13,510 17,040 18,580 12 11,600 16 ,350 20,930 23,200 Urbanized Lanes B C D E 4 4,130 5,640 7,070 7,690 6 6,200 8,450 10 ,510 11,530 8 8,270 11,270 13,960 15,380 10 10,350 14,110 17 ,3 10 19 ,220 Freeway Adjustments Auxilial)' Lanes Ramp Prese nt in Both Direction s Metering + 1,800 +5% UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Lanes Median B C D E 2 Undivided 1,050 1,620 2,180 2,930 4 Divided 3,270 4,730 5,960 6,780 6 Divided 4,910 7,090 8,950 10,180 Uninterrupted F low Highway Adjustments Lanes Median Exclusive left lanes Adjustment factors 2 Di v ided Ye s +5% Mu lt i Undivided Ye s -5 % Mult i Undivided No -25 % 1Vnlucs shown ore prcscn1ed as peak hour dircctionnl volwne• for levels of service and on: for the automobile/truck modes unJc., specifically sta ted. This lllhle docs not constirutc • standard and should be used only for gcncn,J planning applic,itions. The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific planning applications. The table and deriving computer models should not be used for corridor or intersection design, where more refined techniques exisL Calculations :ire bAScd on planning npplications oftJ,c HCM :ind the Transit Capacity and Quality of Service ManUll], 'Level of service for the bicycle and pedestrian modes io this lllble is basc:d on number of vehicles, not number of bicyclists or pedestrians using the facility. 1 Busts per hour sh<M11 nrc: only for the peak hour in the single direction of the higher traffic flow. • Cannot be nchievcd using table input vuluc defaults. •• Not applicable for that level of service lcncr gmde. Fo r the lWtomobile mode, volumes gn,atcr than Jc,-cl of service D become F because intersection capacities have been reached. For the bicycle mode. the lc \l c1 of s ervice letter grade (including F) is not achievab le bccau.se there is no maximum vehicle volwnc threshold using tnblc input value defaults. Scurci!: Florido Dcpanmcnt ofTransportation Systems Implementation Office l11tps :l/www .luo1,l!0,·/pl:uming/syst<ins/ DJ 264 ~tate of Florida e artment of Transportation Syste ms fmplementation Off,ce 605 Suwannee St. MS 19 Tallahassee, FL 32399 \ll!W" .fdot.gov/planning SITE S DI XI E H W Y SUNSET DR.SW 61 AVE.SW 59 PL.SW 71 ST. CITY HALL 265 "ROSSWOOD"BLOCK 3LOT 1LOT 15LOT 14LOT 13LOT 12LOT 11LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 "ROSSWOOD" BLOCK 2 LOT 4 LOT 5 LOT 6 LOT 7 LOT 8 LOT 9 "ROSSWOOD"BLOCK 1TRACT ALOT 3 BLOCK 110 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1LOT 11BLOCK 2LOT 3 LOT 2 LOT 1 TRACT- 2 "COMMERCIAL LARKINS" AMENDED PLAT OF T R A C T - 1 "C O M M E R C I A L L A R K I N S " TRACT-3 "COMMERCIAL LARKINS" AMENDED PLAT OF "COMMERCIALLARKINS""REILLY, STOMS ANDPAXSOON SUBDIVISION"BLOCK 1TRACT ABLOCK 1 "ROSSWOOD"BLOCK 3LOT 1LOT 15LOT 14LOT 13LOT 12LOT 11LOT 1 LOT 3 "ROSSWOOD"BLOCK 2LOT 4 LOT 5 LOT 6 LOT 7 LOT 8 LOT 9"ROSSWOOD"BLOCK 1TRACT ALOT 3 (REMINDER)"REILLY, STOMS AND PAXSON SUBDIVISION"BLOCK 1LOT 10LOT 9LOT 8LOT 7LOT 6LOT 5LOT 4LOT 11"COMMERCIAL LARKINS" BLOCK 2 LOT 2 TRACT- 2 "COMMERCIAL LARKINS" AMENDED PLAT OF T R A C T - 1 "C O M M E R C I A L L A R K I N S " A M E N D E D P L A T O F BLOCK 1PORTION OF TRACT ABLOCK 1 LOT 3CB MFDMHDMHDMHSMHEEEEEE ECBBRGCMBWM(2)WVWVBRGCPLGVBGVDC DCDCDCWVWVWV N87°14'59"E 236.34' (C)S02°31'54"E 297.95' (C)S87°25'36"W 235.66' (C)N02°39'17"W 297.22' (C)GATEGATEVACANTMEDIANMEDIANHHCHHCGRASSDCDCEPLEPLEPLEPLEPLEPLEPL E PLEPLBLOCK 1PORTION OF TBM 1TBM 2SURVEYOR AND MAPPER.NOT VALID WITHOUTTHE SIGNATURE ANDTHE ORIGINAL RAISED SEALOF A FLORIDA LICENSEDBY:SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE:E-Mail: office@leiterperez.com WEBSITE: www.leiterperez.com LICENSED BUSINESS No. 6787SHEET 1 OF 1MIAMI-DADE (305) 652-5133 BROWARD (954)524-2202 FAX: (305) 652-0411520 N.W. 165TH STREET ROAD, SUITE 209, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33169LAND PLANNERS - ENVIRONMENTALCIVIL ENGINEERS - LAND SURVEYORSLAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTSF.B.PG.FILE NO.:JOB ORDER:TYPE OF SURVEY:PREPARED FOR:DATE:JOB ORDER:DESCRIPTION:F.B. PG.R E V I S I O N S :MAESTRA SUNSET LLC.SURVEY DATE:B-2731FILE NAME:STATE OF FLORIDAGEOFFREY LEITER, PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR & MAPPER #6395ORTHLOCATION MAP, PRESIDENT030'60'90'WE HEREBY CERTIFY: THAT THIS SURVEY IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BESTOF OUR KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF AS RECENTLY SURVEYED AND DRAWN UNDEROUR DIRECTION, AND THAT THIS SURVEY MEETS THE "STANDARDS OF PRACTICE"AS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORSAND MAPPERS IN CHAPTER 5J-17 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TOSECTION 470.027 FLORIDA STATUTES.NOTES1.ELEVATIONS WHEN SHOWN REFER TO THE NATIONALVERTICAL DATUM (NGVD) 1929.2.THIS FIRM HAS MADE NO ATTEMPT TO LOCATE FOOTINGSAND/OR FOUNDATIONS (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED).3.THE LANDS SHOWN HEREON HAVE NOT BEEN ABSTRACTED BYTHIS FIRM REGARDING MATTERS OF INTEREST, OTHERPARTIES, SUCH AS EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY, ETC.4.THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED FOR AND CERTIFIED TO THEPARTY AND/OR PARTIES INDICATED HEREON AND IS NOTTRANSFERABLE OR ASSIGNABLE.5.ALL IRON PIPES & NAILS AND DISCS SET BY THIS FIRM, SETWITH CAP OR DISC WITH LB# 6787.Community No.: 120658Community Name: South MiamiPanel No: 0458Suffix: LMap Number: 12086C0458LFlood Zone: XBase Flood Elevation: N/ADate of Map Panel: 9/11/2009Date of Firm Index: 9/11/2009FEMA FLOOD ZONESCALE:1"=30'This item has been digitally signed and sealed by GeoffreyLeiter, P.S.M. No. 6395 State of Florida, on 4/07/22 using aDigital Signature.Printed copies of this document are not considered signed andsealed and the SHA authentication code must be verified onany electronic copies.THISSURVEYNOTES:1.PROPERTY ADDRESS: 6075 SUNSET DRIVE, MIAMI, FL 33143.2.FOLIO: NO. 09-4025-011-0010.3.LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHOWN HEREON PROVIDED BY OUR CLIENT.4.CLIENT: MAESTRA SUNSET LLC.5.THIS SITE LIES IN SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 54S, RANGE 40E, CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FLORIDA.6.BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE REFERENCED TO THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUM 1983 (2011ADJUSTMENT) FLORIDA EAST STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM WITH A MEASURED BEARING OFS87°25'36"W ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SW 72nd STREET.7.ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE REFERENCED TO THE NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM 1929(NGVD29).8.REFERENCE BENCHMARK: MIAMI-DADE COUNTY BENCHMARK SOUTH MIAMI, LOCATOR 4005 WELEVATION 13.30 FEET (N.G.V.D.).9.NO ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO DETERMINE THE NATURE, SIZE, LOCATION AND DEPTH OF UNDERGROUNDUTILITIES. THIS INFORMATION SHOULD BE OBTAINED FROM CONTRACTOR'S AS-BUILTS AND/OR"NO-CUTS" PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION.10.GPS BASE STATION PROVIDED BY THE FDOT FLORIDA PERMANENT REFERENCE NETWORK USINGSURVEY GRADE KINEMATICS GPS PROCEDURES.11.ALL MEASUREMENTS ALONG PROPERTY LINES ARE RECORD AND MEASURED UNLESS STATEDOTHERWISE.12.TOTAL AREA: THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CONTAINS 1.6124 ACRES OR 70,236 SQUARE FEET, MORE ORLESS.13.RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES DO NOT REPRESENT AN OPINION OF OWNERSHIP BY THIS FIRM.14.TREE AND LANDSCAPING INFORMATION WERE NOT COLLECTED FOR THIS SURVEY.15.IF SHOWN, FENCE AND WALL OWNERSHIP IS NOT DETERMINED.16.LANDS SHOWN HEREON HAVE NOT BEEN ABSTRACTED BY THIS FIRM REGRADING EASEMENTS,RIGHTS-OF-WAY OR ANY OTHER MATTERS OF RECORD.17.THIS IS A BOUNDARY SURVEY.18.ALL DOCUMENTS ARE RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.19.THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED FOR AND CERTIFIED TO THE PARTY AND/OR PARTIES INDICATED HEREONAND IS NOT TRANSFERABLE OR ASSIGNABLE.20.LAST DATE OF FIELD WORK PERFORMED ON 3/23/22BOUNDARY SURVEY WITH SPOT ELEVATIONSLEGAL DESCRIPTION:ALL OF TRACT A, LESS THE EAST 118 FEET OF THE NORTH129.07 FEET, IN BLOCK 1, AND LOT 3, IN BLOCK 1, OF"ROSSWOOD", ACCORDING TO HE PLAT THEREOF, ASRECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, AT PAGE 62 IN THE PUBLICRECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE SOUTH25 FEET OF SAID BLOCK 1.BR-BIKE RACKBGV-BELOW GROUND VAULTCONC-CONCRETECO-SEWER CLEANOUT(C)-CALCULATED-CENTERLINECB-CATCH BASINCLF-CHAINLINK FENCECLP-CONCRETE LIGHT POLECG-2' CURB & GUTTERDC-DROP CURB(D)-DEEDDMH-DRAINAGE MANHOLE-ELECTRIC HANDHOLE-FIRE HYDRANTFEMA-FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENTAGENCYFDOT-FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATIONGC-GARBAGE CANGW-GUY WIRE ANCHORGV-GAS VALVEHHC-HANDHOLE COMCASTID-IDENTIFICATIONLB-LICENSED BUSINESS-METAL LIGHT POLEMB-METAL BENCH-OVERHEAD WIREORB-OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOKPB-PLAT BOOK(P)-PLATPL-PLANTER-PARKING METERPRM-PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENTR/W-RIGHT-OF-WAYSEC.-SECTIONS/W-SIDEWALK-SIGNTBM-TEMPORARY BENHMARKWV-WATER VALVEWM-WATER METEROHWLEGEND/SYMBOL:E3/23/2222-138SPOT ELEVATIONS266 6075 SUNSET DRIVEA-0.2 CONTEXT MAP CONTEXT MAP NORTH SITE S DI XI E H W Y SUNSET DR.SW 61 AVE.SW 59 PL.SW 71 ST. CITY HALL 267 CHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV 4'-5" SETBACK 23'-9" ARCADE 10'-0"14'-0"10'-0"ARCADEMINOR STMINOR STREET INT SIDEMAIN STREETEXTENT OF BUILDINGFOOTPRINTSW 72ND STREET (SUNSET DRIVE)SW 71STSW 61ST AVE 245'-9"BUILDING DEPTH4'-10"SETBACK4'-11"SETBACK6075 SUNSET DRIVEEXHIBIT (BUILDING PLACEMENT)NORTHEX-1BUILDING PLACEMENTLEGENDBUILDING FOOTPRINTPUBLIC PLAZA268 18'-0"CURB23'-9"ARCADEFACE OF COL.ALL PERMITEDNON-RESIDENTIAL USESALL PERMITED USESCURBPROPOSED 10 STORY PROPOSED 2 STORYGARAGEALL PERMITED USESALL PERMITED USESALL PERMITED USESALL PERMITED USESALL PERMITED USESALL PERMITED USESALL PERMITED USESALL PERMITED USESPROPERTY LINEPUBLIC PLAZA 2RETAILCOURTYARD12'-8"GROUND FLOOR ROOF6'-2"STBKPROPERTY LINE20' SETBACK AFTER 5TH FLOORCOURTYARD (SW 71 ST)SW 72 ST(SUNSET DRIVE)17'-4"PUBLIC PLAZA24'-3"SETBACKMINOR STREETMAIN STREET251'-7"BUILDING DEPTH4'-7"STBK28'-4"PUBLIC PLAZA 17,530 SQFT890 SQFT4'-5"STBK101'-0" BUILDING HEIGHT8 STORY MAX., AND UP TO 12 STORIES THROUGH BONUS. 150'-0" MAX.110'-0"BUILDINGS TALLEST POINT 6075 SUNSET DRIVEEXHIBIT EX-2HEIGHT & USES269 CHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV 5" CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV CHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV 5" CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATION EVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEV CHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEV CHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEV CHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEV CHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEV CHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEV CHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEV CHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEV CHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE123456789101112TYP. TREE CANOPYCL CLSW 72ND STREET(SUNSET DRIVE)SW 71STMINOR STSW 61ST AVEMINOR STINT SIDETO CITY HALLMAIN ST4'-10"STBKTO CITY HALL 4'-7"STBK 23'-9"ARCADE 6075 SUNSET DRIVEEXHIBIT 3EX-3LEVEL AREAS270 CHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV123456789 101112EXTENT OF BUILDINGFOOTPRINTSW 72ND STREET(SUNSET DRIVE)SW 71STMINOR STSW 61ST AVEMINOR ST INT SIDE TO CITY HALL MAIN ST4'-10"STBKTO CITY HALL 4'-7" STBK 23'-9" ARCADE 6075 SUNSET DRIVESITE PLANNORTHSP-1SITE PLAN271 CHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV CHARGING HOUR 7 AM TO 6 PM ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING AND CHARGING STATION EV123456789 101112SW 72ND STREET(SUNSET DRIVE)SW 71STMINOR STSW 61ST AVEMINOR ST INT SIDE TO CITY HALL MAIN ST4'-10"STBKTO CITY HALL 4'-7" STBK 23'-9" ARCADE 6075 SUNSET DRIVELEVEL 1NORTHA-2.1LEVEL 112345678910111213141516123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114272 CHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEV5"CHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEV5"CHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVCHARGINGHOUR7 AM TO 6 PMELECTRICVEHICLEPARKINGANDCHARGINGSTATIONEVRAMP 6075 SUNSET DRIVEA-2.2 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 2 NORTH 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281282283284285 286 287288289290291292293294295296 297298299300301302303304305306307308 309310311 273 6075 SUNSET DRIVEA-2.3 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 3 NORTH 274 6075 SUNSET DRIVEA-2.4 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 4 NORTH 275 6075 SUNSET DRIVEA-2.5 LEVEL 5 LEVEL 5 NORTH 276 6075 SUNSET DRIVEA-2.6 LEVEL 6 LEVEL 6 NORTH 277 6075 SUNSET DRIVEA-2.7 LEVEL 7 LEVEL 7 NORTH 278 6075 SUNSET DRIVEA-2.8 LEVEL 8 LEVEL 8 NORTH 279 6075 SUNSET DRIVEA-2.9 LEVEL 9 LEVEL 9 NORTH 280 6075 SUNSET DRIVEA-2.10 LEVEL 10 LEVEL 10 NORTH 281 6075 SUNSET DRIVEA-2.11 ROOF PLAN ROOF PLAN NORTH 282 283 T 0. PARAPET 1os'-o" $Rp OF E~EV 1 01' -0 " $ L IE VEL 10 Et::.EV 90' -0" $ L IE VEL 9 EC.EV 80'-4 " $ LEVE L 8 EL EV 70 '-8 " $ LEVEL 7 ELE V 61'-0 " $ L EVE L 6 ELEV 51'-4 " $ LEVEL 5 ELEV 41'-8" $ L EV EL 4 ELE V 32 ' -0 " $ L EV EL 3 ELEV 2 2 '-4" $ L EVEL 2 ELEV 12 '-8 " L EVEL 1 ELEV 0'-0 ' L EVEL 0 CONCRETE FRAME SCORING DETAIL ,-----=_CONCRETE FRAME CD SOUTH ELEVATION SCA LE: 3/32" = 1'-0" 9400 MESH RAILING DECORATIVE COLUMNS ,----==----EYEBROW [D [D [D[D [D [D [D[D [D [D[D PLAZA & RETAIL POOL COURTYARD @LEVEL 3 DECORATIVE SCREEN DECORATIVE --SCREEN EYEBROWS ,---=-SCORING ,----=_ CONCRETE FRAME ____ MESH RAILINGS =..-------DECORATIVE COLUMNS DECORATIVE ,..__ COLUMN ~ @_K_E _Y_P_LA_~-C-AL_E_: N-.T-.S. NORTH SOUTH -ELEVATION SCALE : 3/32" = 1 '-0" REVISIONS BY ~ SUBM ITTAL #1 ~ 04/29/2022 ~ SUBMITTAL #2 (I} D7 /06/2022 "l--'--'--------11--- 9 SUBMITTAL #3 '.J i,.;0~7 /~18:;../.:;;20;.:;:22:...,_ ___ --11--- u. SUBMITTAL #4 ~ 08/08/2022 w SUBMITTAL #5 ~ 08/24/2022 :;: P""'-=;.._-----11--- " I 0 1----------11--- 0 z "I----------''--- ~ D'. ,, 0 i" a' 5 g w I f- !i; 0 w z " "' ~ 0 ~ U) 0 D'. cl ~ 0 N 0 N -z 0 E 0 w i" z ~ U) w 0 8 " z g " rn cl ii' 0 G' w i" I f- 3' ':; a. :, 8 U) z 0 ~ a: 0 w a. U) 0 z " U) s a. w i" w > -c::: 0 I-w (/) z => (/) LO r--.. 0 c.o u z (J) I-u w I- I LO um Ct'. DO <( 0 0 <( 0 (J) ~ 2 <( u __J __J __J LL t-w .:.:-- (/) <( 2 Z O <( .. ::i w 15(1)':;;:2 LL U I <( 0 t-Cl'.'. _J t-::i (/) 0 w (/) <( 2 <O f-"' "' => n 0 n u - ~ <( -0 0, -0, i I") a:: I On $'. ~ ~ r-- Vl -N o~~~ I.{) -<(0 Ol=:1-1") COC/1~__,, ~ u § w ~ ~ I-~ t w f- l:] ~~o::< ~ w :, ~ w 0 0 u " z 0 ~ " rn U) '>-- 0 ~ I u D'. " DRAWN ,-: u w f- 'i' u D'. " w I f- >-[Il 0 w > D'. w "' w D'. w D'. " "' f- I CJ ii' _J _J " 0 z " LL 0 /: D'. w a. 0 D'. a. _J " CJ w _J DATE 02/02/2022 SCALE AS SHOWN JOB NO. 2114.PRJ SHEET TITLE : SOUTH -ELEVATION SHEET NUMBER : A-3.1 284 $ T.O. FeARA PE T 1os·-o·~ $ROOF ELEV n 01'-o" $ LEVELJ 10 ELEV 90' -0 " *BO N S $ LEVEL' 9 ELE V 80' -4" *BO NUS $ LEVEL' 8 ELEV 70' -8" $LEVE L 7 ELEV 6 1'-o" $LEVE L 6 ELEV 51'-4" $LEVE L 5 ELE V 41'-8" $LEVEL 4 ELE V 32' -0" $LEVEL 3 ELEV 22' -4" ~ $LEVEL 2 ELEV 12' -8" LEVE L 1 ELE V o·-o· LEVE L 0 CONCRETE FRAME PLAZA SCORING DETAIL -□ -□ D- B B -B ~--CONCRETE FRAME B.O .H @ WEST ELEVATION SCALE : 3/32" = 1'-0" MESH RAILING ~-=-EYEBROW DJ DJ DJ [I] [I] EB LOBBY & BIKE 9400 DECORATIVE COLUMNS DECORATIVE SCREEN DJ DJ DJ DJ DJ DJ DJ DJ DJ [I] DJ '---METAL '---EYEBROW DECORATIVE --SCREEN AWNING EYEBROWS SCORING DECORATIVE PLAZA ,___ COLUMN ®f--K_E_Y_P_LA_~_C_AL_E_: N-_T-_S_ NORTH WEST -ELEVATION CONCRETE FRAME DECORATIVE COLUMNS SC ALE : 3/32 " = 1'-0" ~ ~ r V, <( □ " 0 -' "- " " "' 0: w r [L <( I u □ z <( /: " 0 I r :, <( -' <( u 0 -' w I r In 0 w z " 0: w r w 0 V, <( V, □ 0: <( 0 ! V, 5 "-i)j w 0: a: w -' m <( u :, [L [L <( w I r 0 z " 0 N 0 N -z 0 E 0 w V, z :l [L w I r ~ z w " ~ r V, w □ 0 u " z g :, m V, 8 c I u ~ REVISI ONS BY SUBMITTAL /fl 04/29/2022 SUBMITTAL /12 07/06/2022 SUBMITTAL /13 07/18/2022 SUBMITTAL 64 08/08/2022 SUBMITTAL #5 08/24/2022 ,, w >-' > u w c -0 I 0:::: _J u _J er _J <( I..!... 0 w f-I r I-w f-'..'-->-(/) <( 2 (D w Z O <l: 0 .. ::) w w (/) ~(/)~2 > 0: w z LL u I VJ w <l:O f-er ::> Cl:'. _J w f-::) er (/) (/) 0 " w (/) VJ r LC) «: I " r-,... 2 er 0 -' -' " (0 0 z " "- 0 I:: 0: w n. 0 er 11. -' " " w -' DRAWN DAT E 02/02/2022 SCALE AS SHOWN JOB NO 2114.PRJ S H EET T ITL E: WEST -ELEVATION SH EET NUM BE R: A-3.2 285 $ T.O. PARAPET 1os'-o'~ $ROOF ELEV 101 ' -O" $LEVEL 10 ELEV 90' -0" *BONUS $LEVEL 9 ELEV 80' -4" *BONUS $LEVEL 8 ELEV 70' -8" $ LEVEL 7 ELEV 61' -O" $LEVEL 6 ELEV 51'-4" $LEVEL 5 ELEV 41' -8" $LEVEL 4 ELEV 32 ' -0" LEVEL 3 E~EV 22'- LEV EL 0 CONCRETE FRAME [I] [I] DJ II LOADING & B.H .O Q) NORTH ELEVATION SCORING DETAIL " ~-CONCR ETE FRAME SCALE 3/32" = 1'-0" MESH RAILING [I] [I] [I] [I] [I] [I] [I] GARAGE ENTRY 9400 DECORATIVE COLUMNS ,----EYEBROW RETAIL [I] [I] [I] QUITE COURTYARD @ LEVEL 3 DECORATIVE SCREEN EYEBROWS ,----==----SCORING DECORATIVE ~-SCREEN ,----CONCRETE FRAME r--__ MESH DECORATIVE --COLUMN RAILINGS @f---K_E_Y_P_L_A_~-C-AL_E_: N-.T-.S. NORTH NORTH -ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" REVIS IONS BY ~ SUBMITTAL /11 => 04/29/2022 >-!------'-~------+--~ SUBMITTA L #2 ti) 07/06/2022 «1--~------+-- Q SUBMITTAL #3 ~ 07/18/2022 Jl---------+-- LL SUBMITTAL /14 ~ 08/08/2022 U) SUBMITTAL #5 ffi 08/24/2022 >-I---------+-- ~ ., I U1---------+-- o z "'1-------~-- ' w I w >-,: >-> u <D w 0 t: w -u I z 0:: _J u " _J Cl'. _J ., O'. LL w 0 w >-w f-I 0 w >'-'-· >- ¼' I-(I) <( L ~ u, w Z O <( 0 0 O'. ci::' ::::> ~ L w ii Cf) > Cl'. z 0 (/) <( w G z '"-u:r: en w <( 0 f-Cl'. ~ ::> 0::: _J w LL f-::::> Cl'. "' Cf) (/) 0 ., u, w w (/) en O'. >- C: LC) <( I " w I'--L ii' _, <D "' 0 _, u _, ::J ., ~ (0 ~ 0 "' z w ., I LL >-0 0 z /: ., Cl'. 0 w N Q. 0 0 N Cl'. ~ Q. z 0 _, E ., 0 " w w _, I >-w z I '!/ f- w w u, Cl'. w ., 0 JOSE I. SAUMEL L 0 >-u AR0013085 u ' , w " , z 0 0 O'. . _, Q. >- 5 u u <D _,w z _,t: 1§ <{I Cl'.u ii' (/) WQ'. 0 i,-< _, f-<D LL f-"' u 0: ;;; w w w ::, Cl'.I I 0 "' o,->-f-' 0 -Or I I u; L "' -z<n >-0 "' " u a, --"' "'" .. Cl'.'. <O r--. n o::: I >; <(O -0 ,, l'lZ 3: Lil _J I"--z-~ 0 U)~LL N -C: :, <(8 OQ'. 0 owi~ ,,!,: u (/) <( Ii) t:::: <( 0 :, u, ::;: <( m=i -n rnz z oc, (f) ::1: -.._,, 0 '!lo ~ ~ IW '! >-N LL o:ii' u oO w LLI ~ >-vl (0 en:O 0 "" z :Z cecn ., ""' u, u o:w z -[l'._, :I :z oz ~ _,:o w z.:o I >-w >-<C Wf-w w Om " 0 __j DI w zo _, I-Q_ "'it " 0 z z " <=\)~'!' vl Wz l-Do u w LLJ _J i= >-I j' ., :, u C'::::: [l'.(Il :,-O'. f-Cl'. ., < =:J U>-w w'!' I u ~ ~o >- LL u uO'. 0 Cl'.o >-Cf.) ., . vl Ll_J Wz w <D Ck: f-----IQ w >->--u I I ·:o >-~ UO'. 0 u~tri >-< ·Z ..._ C'::::: ~o >-z uU w <Ci". :, w -z ~ Io u -Cl'.>-u, _,u w :, 0 .:o 0 cno u :,Cl'. " n_ _w z NO'. 0 0 _, NO'. 5 @2 <D u, >-W l-u IUJ w ":, '= ~~ I u O'. o.w "' OI Uf- DRAWN DATE 02/02/2022 SCALE AS SHOWN JOB NO . 2 114.PRJ SHEET TIT L E: NORTH-E L EV ATION SHEET ,NUM BER: A-3.3 286 $ T.O. PARAPET 1os·-o·~ $ROOF ELEV 101'-0" $ LEVE L 10 ELEV 90' -0" $ LEVE L 9 ELEV 80' -4" $ LEVE L 8 ELEV 70' -8" $ LEVE L 7 ELEV 61'-0" $ LEVE L 6 ELEV 51'-4" $ LEVE L 5 ELEV 41'-8" $ LEVE L 4 ELEV 32' -0" LEVE L 0 DECORATIVE COLUMNS PLAZA CONCRETE FRAME CONCRETE FRAME l 0 EAST ELEVATION SCORING DETAIL DJ DJ DJ DJ DJ DJ DJ DJ DJ SCALSC/IU'.321 "= KfJJ!' 9400 MESH RAILING DECORATIVE COLUMNS DECORATIVE SCREEN EYEBROWS EYEBROW CONCRETE MESH FRAME RAILING DJ DJ DJ DJ DJ [D DJ DJ DJ DJ DJ [I] DJ DJ DJ I /I /I /I /1·, / / / / /"/' I · /1---/1--/ / ./ './ ... [ -,,-,,-,,-,.-, ,. I ,. ,I ' GARAGE & DECK @3 @f--K_E_Y_P_L_A_~-C-AL_E_: N-.T-.S. NORTH EAST-ELEVATION CONCRETE FRAME SCORING SC ALE : 3/32" = 1 '-0" REVISIONS BY ~ SUB MITTAL #1 ~ 04/29/2022 rt--~-----+--~ SUBMITTAL 8-2 v, 07/06/2022 -<t--------+-- Q SUBMITTAL fl-3 g-; 07/18/2022 _J l--~-----+-- LI.. SUBMITTAL #4 ~ 08/08/2022 ID SUBMITTAL #5 ffi 08/24/2022 >-t--------+--- 0. " I 01--------+-- o z "t--------~- w I w >-t-' >-> 0 "' w t: D -u I w z 0::: _J 0 " _J °' _J " °' LL w 0 w w f---I D w ~--t- 'ii I->-(/) <( 2 "' "' w z o<C D D "" ci:' ::::> ~ 2 w " (f) > D ll'. z 0 (/) <( w " z LI... u :r: in "' w <(O f--ll'. ~ :::> 0::: _J w "-f---::::> ll'. " (f) (/) 0 <( "' w w (/) "' "' >- C: LO <( I " w I'--2 "' _J "' <{ 0 _J u _J ::, <( {L <O {L D <{ z w <( I "->-0 D z I= <{ ll'. 0 w N {L 0 0 N ll'. ~ {L z 0 _J E <{ 0 " w w _J I w t-z I w t-> w w V, ll'. w " D JOSE I. SAUMELL 0 t-u AR0013085 0 ., w " , z 0 0 ll'. . =' {Lt- :::, u u (D _Jw z _Jt: 11 <CI ll'.u "' (J) wll'. 0 >.: _J I-<D 0 "->--o() u °' ;;; w w w :::, °'I I 0 ,,, Ot-t-I-u '--o>-I I L0 " ->-" 0'" z<D " u "' -'" " et: CX) r!: r<1 o:: I C) >:; <( 0 _o,,, C)Z ~,n _Jr--~~ {L 0 (I)~ LL N " <( 0 Oct 0 o ~ ~~Ul ='3 u (J) :;! I.!)_ <l; 0 ::, "' :::;:<( OJ::J-1"') coz z {0(/):;;:-......., c:, \Qo a' ~ IW u t-N C: ll'.°' u oO w tcI {L t-V, (__Cl{/):, 0 "" z :z ;;{I) " ,0{1) V, u "w z -QC_J :I :z 0~ {L _J w :Z 'i'o I t-w I t-<( Wr w w Om " 0 __j DI w zo _J I-Q_ "~ ,. 0 z z "' ~ ~IQ "' Wz ·e-□ o u w LU _JF t-I I .:::> u e::::: Q'.(D "' ::,-t-Q'. " < =::Jo"" w WIQ I u ~ io t- "-LJ o°' 0 ll'.O t-en " . V, LU wZ w "' ~ I---IQ r t-w -0 I =r:::•::, t-~ Oo: 0 u~tn t-< ·Z '-e::::: I"□ t-z oO w <(I". " w -z t-IQ ~ o -ll'.t-.,y w ::, 0 ,jig 0 0 ""' " {L _w z NO'. 0 0 =' NO'. ::, @2 "' V, t-W j... u I{I) w ()::> t: ~~ I u "' o.w <{ DI Ot- DR AWN DAT E 02/02/2022 SCALE AS SHO\\N J OB N O . 2114.PRJ S H EET TITLE : EAST-ELEVATION S H EET N U MBER: A-3.4 10'-0" ARCADE PLAZA PLAZA BEHIND 6075 SUNSET DRIVEA-3.5 SECTION SECTION 287 UNIT A1 UNIT A2 UNIT A4UNIT A3 UNIT PLANS A-4.1 UNIT PLANS6075 SUNSET DRIVE288 UNIT A5 UNIT B1UNIT A1 UNIT A4M UNIT PLANS A-4.2 UNIT PLANS6075 SUNSET DRIVE289 UNIT B2 UNIT B3 UNIT B4 UNIT PLANS A-4.3 UNIT PLANS6075 SUNSET DRIVE290 UNIT B6UNIT B5 UNIT PLANS A-4.4 UNIT PLANS6075 SUNSET DRIVE291 6075 SUNSET DRIVERENDERING 1RE-1RENDERING292 6075 SUNSET DRIVERENDERING 2RE-2RENDERING293 6075 SUNSET DRIVERENDERING 3RE-3RENDERING294 "ROSSWOOD" N87°14'59"E 236.34' (C)S02°31'54"E 297.95' (C)S87°25'36"W 235.66' (C)N02°39'17"W 297.22' (C)1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TYP. TREE CANOPY S.W. 72ND STREET (SUNSET DRIVE) MAIN STREETS.W. 61ST AVENUEMINOR STREETS.W. 71ST STREET MINOR STREET CLCLCL Tree to Remain SYMBOL LEGEND #x NORTH Scale: 1"=20'-0" TREE DISPOSITION PLAN Drawing: Tree Disposition Plan Date: 07/01/2022 Scale: See Left Drawn by: MAV Sheet No.: TD-1 Cad Id.: 2022-0406075 SUNSET DRIVESOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 33143 TREE DISPOSITION PLANZ:\2022\Mixed Use\6075 Sunset - 2022-040\Tree Disposition\2022.08.24\TD-1.dwg Aug 24, 2022307 south 21st avenue hollywood, floridaphone: 954.923.9681 facsimile: 954.923.9689www.witkindesign.comSeal: Lic. # LA0000889 Member: A.S.L.A.Project:Revisions:By:Date: ©2020 WITKIN HULTS + PARTNERS THE DESIGN AND DRAWINGS HEREIN ARE THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OF THIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND ARE PROTECTED UNDER THE COPYRIGHT PROTECTION ACT 07.06.20221) CGA – 1ST REVIEW MAV 08.24.20222) Submittal #5 MAV 295 CAFE LEASING RETAIL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TYP. TREE CANOPY S.W. 72ND STREET (SUNSET DRIVE) MAIN STREETS.W. 61ST AVENUEMINOR STREETS.W. 71ST STREET MINOR STREET 6 BEDS CC 3 PX 20 AB 20 ZZ 45 FL 8 NE 15 RH 3 AA 45 NE 60 RH 3 AA 50 3 BEDS AB 10 ZZ 40 CC 6 PX 45 PX 15 RH 1 CFT 1 AI 1 7.5' RADIUSTYPICAL 10'x10' PEDESTRIAN SAFETY SIGHT TRIANGLE 20'x20' SIGHT TRIANGLE CLCL CL FIRE HYDRANT TYPICAL 4X4 ADDAPAVE POROUS TREE PIT SYSTEM WITH 8" STANDARD CONCRETE BANDING 20'x20' SIGHT TRIANGLE 4'-6" TYP. B. No. shrubs allowed x 30% = No. of native shrubs required A. No. trees required x 10 = No. of shrubs allowed SHRUBS A + D + E = ______ Total Trees F. Total Trees Required E. Street trees located directly beneath power lines (maximum average spacing of 25' o.c.):_______ linear feet along street / 25 = _________ linear feet along 72nd Street = D. Street trees (maximum average spacing of 35' o.c.): C. % Natives Required: No. trees and Palms provided x 50% = B. % Palms Allowed: No. trees required x 30% = = _______ trees x net lot acres = Less existing number of trees meeting minimum requirements A. No. trees required per net lot acre TREES A. _________ total s.f. of landscaped open space required by Chapter 33 B. Maximum lawn area (sod) permitted = ______ % x _________s.f. = LAWN AREA CALCULATION C. Total s.f. of landscaped open space required by Chapter 33: A + B = No. outside/ground-level parking spaces______ x 10 s.f. per parking spaces = B. Square Feet of parking lot open space required, as indicated on site plan: Net lot area = ________ s.f. x _____ % = _________ s.f. A. Square Feet of open space required, as indicated on site plan: PROVIDEDREQUIREDOPEN SPACE s.f.acresNet Lot AreaZoning District: LANDSCAPE LEGEND Information Required to be Permanently Affixed to Plan 55 N/A 36*/*** - N/A N/A N/A 4,855.2 0 s.f. N/AN/A N/A- TODD MU-6 SEE LANDSCAPE 165165 550550 5555 N/AN/A 255 8**8 6*** 28 17 3622 60 N/A 70,2361.624 88 33 _________ linear feet along 61st Ave= _________ linear feet along 71st Street = 269 87 Total Street Trees=1919 8,092 8,092 Palms = 2:1 Palms as Street Trees = 1:1 30 *Includes 4 existing Live Oaks along S.W. 72nd Street **Includes 8 existing Live Oaks along S.W. 72nd Street ***Includes 10 trees and 10 Palms (Counted 2:1) on the 3rd Level **** Although 32 Palms are specified with 20 of them being native palms, only 12 of the native palms are included in calculation towards requirement No. Palms provided x 50%: 12 Palms Counted towards requirement 12 12**** No. trees provided x 50% DESCRIPTIONQUAN.SYMBOL PROPOSED MATERIAL SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS DESCRIPTIONQUAN.SYMBOL PROPOSED MATERIAL TREES AND PALMS * DENOTES NATIVE SPECIES GROUND LEVEL LANDSCAPE LIST 7 GAL.LADY PALM Rhaphis excelsaRH7 3' O.A. HT. Ficus lyrata FIDDLE FICUS FL 7 GAL. 5'HT. X 2' SPR. 9 7 GAL. 4' O.A. HT. CAT PALM Chamaedorea cataractarumCC ZZ ZANZIBAR GEM Zamculcas zamiifolia 18" HT. X 18" SPR./ 18" O.C. 3 GAL.85 *Nephrolepis exaltata 18" HT. X 15" SPR. / 18" O.C. NE BOSTON FERN 3 GAL. FULL75 DWARF PHILODENDRON Philodendron xanaduPX 3 GAL. 18" HT. X 15" SPR. / 18" O.C. 80 95 3 GAL. 18" HT. X 18" SPR./ 18" O.C. FLAMINGO FLOWER Anthurium andraeanumAA 30 Aechmea blanchettiana 36" HT. X 24" SPR. AB2 BRIGHT YELLOW BROMELIAD 10" POT 9 12' HT. X 6' SPR. 2" Cal.*Coccoloba diversiflora PIGEON PLUM F.G. *Myrcianthis fragrans SIMPSON'S STOPPER 10' HT. X 2" Cal. F.G.9 12' HT. X 6' SPR. 2" Cal.*Conocarpus erectus GREEN BUTTONWOOD F.G. 3 F.G. 10' HT. X 2" Cal. Elaeocarpus decipiens JAPANESE BLUEBERRY6 1 9" POT 2'-6" O.A. SPR.Alcantarea imperialis IMPERIAL BROMELIAD AI 1 GREEN/WHITE/PINK TI PLANT 3 GAL. 3' O.A. HT. 3 PPP Cordyline fruticosa 'Tricolor'CFT 8 DESCRIPTIONQUAN.SYMBOL PROPOSED MATERIAL SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS DESCRIPTIONQUAN.SYMBOL PROPOSED MATERIAL TREES AND PALMS * DENOTES NATIVE SPECIES 3RD LEVEL LANDSCAPE LIST 270 3 GAL. 24" HT. X 24" SPR. / 24" O.C. Bougainville 'Helen Johnson' HELEN JOHNSON DWARF BOUGAINVILLEA BG *Clusia guttifera SMALL LEAF CLUSIA CG 3 GAL. 24" HT. X 24" SPR. / 24" O.C. 220 *Chrysobalanus icaco GREEN COCOPLUM CI 3 GAL. 18" HT. X 18" SPR. / 18" O.C. 100 Ficus microcarpa 'Green Island' GREEN ISLAND FICUS FM 3 GAL. 15" HT. X 15" SPR. / 15" O.C. 784 20 F.G., STAGGERED. 18' O.A. HT. MIN., DOUBLE F.G., MATCHED HTS.12 22' O.A. HT. 8' C.T. *Myrcianthis fragrans SIMPSON'S STOPPER 10' HT. X 2" Cal. F.G.8 SILVER DATE PALM Pheonix sylvestris 'Robusta' FLORIDA THATCH PALM *Thrinax radiata 28 7 GAL. 4' O.A. HT. CAT PALM Chamaedorea cataractarumCC Schefflera arboricola 'Trinette' VARIEGATED SCHEFFLERA SV 3 GAL. 18" HT. X 18" SPR. / 18" O.C. 145 30 GAL. , FULL 6' HT. X 4' SPR.Jatropha integerrima JATROPHA TREE13JI F.G. 10' HT. X 2" Cal. Elaeocarpus decipiens JAPANESE BLUEBERRY2 Tree to Remain SYMBOL LEGEND #x NORTH SHEET INDEX: TD-1 TREE DISPOSITION PLAN L-1 GROUND LEVEL LANDSCAPE PLAN L-2 3RD LEVEL LANDSCAPE PLAN L-3 LANDSCAPE DETAILS L-4 AERIAL Scale: 1"=20'-0" GROUND LEVEL LANDSCAPE PLAN Drawing: Ground Level Landscape Plan Date: 04/28/2022 Scale: See Left Drawn by: MAV Sheet No.: L-1 Cad Id.: 2022-0406075 SUNSET DRIVESOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 33143 GROUND LEVEL LANDSCAPE PLANZ:\2022\Mixed Use\6075 Sunset - 2022-040\Landscape\2022.08.24\L-1.dwg Aug 24, 2022307 south 21st avenue hollywood, floridaphone: 954.923.9681 facsimile: 954.923.9689www.witkindesign.comSeal: Lic. # LA0000889 Member: A.S.L.A.Project:Revisions:By:Date: ©2020 WITKIN HULTS + PARTNERS THE DESIGN AND DRAWINGS HEREIN ARE THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OF THIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND ARE PROTECTED UNDER THE COPYRIGHT PROTECTION ACT 1 11 07.06.20221) CGA – 1ST REVIEW MAV 1 2 2 08.24.20222) Submittal #5 MAV 2 22 2 2 2 296 5 BEDS BG 85 JI 2 CG 10 CC 4 FM 135 CG 10 SV 35 BG 10 FM 20 FM 40 BG 15 CC 5 CG 10 SV 35 CG 10 BG 10 FM 20 FM 55 BG 25 JI 2 BG 10 FM 20 CG 10 CC 7 CG 10 JI 2 SV 20 FM 50 CG 10 CG 10 CG 10 CG 30 JI 1 BG 10 FM 19 CG 10 CC 6 CG 10 CG 10 JI 3 FM 85 CG 10 CG 10 CG 5 JI 3 SV 55 FM 75 FM 100 CI 75 BG 40 FM 35 CI 10 CC 3 CG 10 CG 15 FM 95 BG 65 FM 35 CI 15 CG 10 CC 3 CG 10 DESCRIPTIONQUAN.SYMBOL PROPOSED MATERIAL SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS DESCRIPTIONQUAN.SYMBOL PROPOSED MATERIAL TREES AND PALMS * DENOTES NATIVE SPECIES 3RD LEVEL LANDSCAPE LIST 270 3 GAL. 24" HT. X 24" SPR. / 24" O.C. Bougainville 'Helen Johnson' HELEN JOHNSON DWARF BOUGAINVILLEA BG *Clusia guttifera SMALL LEAF CLUSIA CG 3 GAL. 24" HT. X 24" SPR. / 24" O.C. 220 *Chrysobalanus icaco GREEN COCOPLUM CI 3 GAL. 18" HT. X 18" SPR. / 18" O.C. 100 Ficus microcarpa 'Green Island' GREEN ISLAND FICUS FM 3 GAL. 15" HT. X 15" SPR. / 15" O.C. 784 20 F.G., STAGGERED. 18' O.A. HT. MIN., DOUBLE F.G., MATCHED HTS.12 22' O.A. HT. 8' C.T. *Myrcianthis fragrans SIMPSON'S STOPPER 10' HT. X 2" Cal. F.G.8 SILVER DATE PALM Pheonix sylvestris 'Robusta' FLORIDA THATCH PALM *Thrinax radiata 28 7 GAL. 4' O.A. HT. CAT PALM Chamaedorea cataractarumCC Schefflera arboricola 'Trinette' VARIEGATED SCHEFFLERA SV 3 GAL. 18" HT. X 18" SPR. / 18" O.C. 145 30 GAL. , FULL 6' HT. X 4' SPR.Jatropha integerrima JATROPHA TREE13JI F.G. 10' HT. X 2" Cal. Elaeocarpus decipiens JAPANESE BLUEBERRY2 Drawing: 3RD Level Landscape Plan Date: 04/28/2022 Scale: See Left Drawn by: MAV Sheet No.: L-2 Cad Id.: 2022-0406075 SUNSET DRIVESOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 33143 3RD LEVEL LANDSCAPE PLAN07.06.20221) CGA – 1ST REVIEW MAV Z:\2022\Mixed Use\6075 Sunset - 2022-040\Landscape\2022.08.24\L-2.dwg Aug 24, 2022307 south 21st avenue hollywood, floridaphone: 954.923.9681 facsimile: 954.923.9689www.witkindesign.comSeal: Lic. # LA0000889 Member: A.S.L.A.Project:Revisions:By:Date: ©2020 WITKIN HULTS + PARTNERS THE DESIGN AND DRAWINGS HEREIN ARE THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OF THIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND ARE PROTECTED UNDER THE COPYRIGHT PROTECTION ACT NORTH Scale: 1"=20'-0" 3RD LEVEL LANDSCAPE PLAN 1 2 08.24.20222) Submittal #5 MAV 297 PLANTING SOIL DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE WILL VARY ACCORDING TO SPECIES AND HABITAT OF GROWTH SO THAT MATURE PLANTS WILL NOT OVER LAP ONTO SIDEWALK, STRUCTURES, PAVED AREAS, ETC. DISTANCE BETWEEN PLANTS SHOULD BE FAR ENOUGH TO ALLOW PLANTS TO REACH MATURE SIZE WITHOUT INTERFERING WITH GROWTH OF ADJACENT PLANT MATERIALS SPACING AS PER PLANS ROOT BALL 12" MIN. 12" MIN. BACKFILL SUBSOIL EXISTING SUBSOIL MINIMUM 2" x 2" x 2" x 0" P.T. PINE WOOD STAKE OR #5 RE-BAR 2'-0" LONG. POSITION TO SECURELY STABILIZE TREE REINFORCED RUBBER HOSE BLACK WELLINGTON 1 2" WIDE NYLON TAPE BLACK WELLINGTON 1 2" WIDE NYLON TAPE ROOT BALL TREE PIT 2"x2"x 2'-0" P.T. PINE WOOD STAKE OR #5 RE-BAR 2'-0" LONG 9"PLANT BALL 9" FINISH GRADE MINIMUM 2" x 2" x 6" P. T. PINE WOOD STAKES OR #5 RE-BAR TWO PER TREE - POSITION TO SECURELY STABILIZE TREE EXISTING SUBSOIL BACKFILL TYPICAL GROUNDCOVER PLANTING DETAILTYPICAL CONTAINER SPACING DETAILTYPICAL SHRUB PLANTING DETAILCURVED TRUNK PALM PLANTING DETAIL STRAIGHT TRUNK PALM PLANTING DETAILTYPICAL TREE GUYING DETAILSMALL TREE PLANTING DETAILLARGE TREE PLANTING DETAIL 120 120 EXISTING SUBSOIL PAVED WALK SPACING OF PLANTS AS INDICATED ON PLANTING PLAN 3" MULCH LAYER, GRADE "A"CLEAR TRUNKGREY WOOD1/3 HEIGHTOF TRUNKEXCAVATE TO A MIN DEPTH OF 12" AND BACKFILL WITH PREPARED PLANTING SOIL TRIANGULAR SPACINGEQUAL PLANTING SOIL MIX AS SPECIFIED SQUARE SPACING MULCH EDGING - ALL PLANT BEDS ADJACENT TO SOD AREAS SHALL RECEIVE A 3" DEEP LAYER OF MULCH LIMIT OF SOD LINE - ALL SOD IS TO BE LAID AS PER DRAWINGS (SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN) NOTE: IN MOST CASES, TRIANGULAR SPACING IS PREFERRED. USE SQUARE SPACING ONLY IN SMALL RECTILINEAR AREAS. 4" EARTH BERM 2" x 4" x 12" PINE FOOTPAD FOR SOFT SOIL CONDITIONS SUCH AS SAND, BURIED 3" BELOW GRADE 2" LAYER OF NEW TOPSOIL EQU A L EQUALWRAP (5) LAYERS OF BURLAP TO TRUNK AT POINT OF SUPPORT (3) 2" x 4" x 6" P. T. PINE WOOD CLEATS . WIRE WITH GALVANIZED METAL STRAP AS SUPPORT FOR WOOD BRACERS - DO NOT NAIL BRACES TO THE TRUNK (3) 2" x 4" P. T. PINE WOOD BRACE @ 120 DEGREES APART. PAINT TO MATCH TRUNK COLOR IF REQUIRED TOP OF MULCH SHALL BE 1/2" BELOW PAVEMENT NOTE: ALL PALMS WITH A CLEAR TRUNK HEIGHT OF 6' FEET OR MORE ARE TO BE STAKED. REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP OF ROOT BALL 4" EARTH BERM 3" MULCH LAYER, GRADE "A" 2" LAYER OF NEW TOPSOIL SPACING AS PER PLANS PLANT BALL 6" MULCH EDGING - ALL PLANTING BEDS ADJACENT TO SOD AREAS SHALL RECEIVE A 4"-6" DEEP LAYER OF MULCH PLANT MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE PRUNED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION - AFTER PLANT HAVE BEEN INSTALLED, EACH PLANT SHALL BE PRUNED FOR UNIFORMITY BACKFILL SOIL EXISTING SUBSOIL TYPICAL CURB AND GUTTER 6" SIDEWALK 6"* GUY WIRE - #12 DOUBLE STRAND TWISTED - WRAP TWICE AROUND TREE TRUNK WITH TWO-PLY RUBBER HOSE AT ALL POINTS OF CONTACT - ATTACH WIRE TO STAKES. 60 DETAIL PLAN 1/3 VERTICALHEIGHTWRAP (5) LAYERS OF BURLAP TO TRUNK AT POINT OF SUPPORT ROOT BALL 12" MIN. BLACK WELLINGTON 1/2" WIDE NYLON TAPE 3" MULCH LAYER, GRADE "A" 2" LAYER OF NEW TOPSOIL REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP OF ROOT BALL 12" MIN. ROOT BALL 12" MIN. EXISTING SUBSOIL BRACING DETAIL 2" X 4" CROSSMEMBERS NAILED TO BRACES 2 (2" x 4") WOOD BRACERS IN " X" SHAPE NAILED TOGETHER (see detail above) BACKFILL SOIL 3" MULCH LAYER, GRADE "A" 2" LAYER OF NEW TOPSOIL 4" EARTH BERM FOOT PAD TRUNK CROSSMEMBER BRACERS 12" MIN.VERTICAL HEIGHT2"x 4"x 12" FOOT PAD FOR SOFT SOIL CONDITIONS SUCH AS SAND; BURIED 3" BELOW GRADE. LIMIT OF SOD LINE - ALL SOD TO BE LAID AS PER DRAWINGS (SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN) EXISTING SUBSOIL 4" EARTH BERM MINIMUM 2" x 2" x 2" x 0" P.T. PINE WOOD STAKE OR #5 RE-BAR 2'-0" LONG. POSITION TO SECURELY STABILIZE TREE 3" MULCH AS SPECIFIED OVER ALL PLANTING BEDS THIN BRANCHES BY 25% - RETAIN NATURAL SHAPE OF PLANT - PAINT ALL CUTS OVER 4" DIA. WITH TREE PAINT - DO NOT CUT CENTRAL LEADER TREES OF SAME SPECIES TO BE MATCHED IN GROWTH CHARACTER ** DO NOT CUT CENTRAL LEADER THIN BRANCHES BY 25% - RETAIN NATURAL SHAPE OF PLANT. PAINT ALL CUTS OVER 1/2" DIAMETER WITH TREE PAINT BLACK WELLINGTON 1/2" WIDE NYLON TAPE 120 OVERALL HEIGHTTRIM ONLY DEAD AND BROKEN FRONDS - DO NOT CUT CENTRAL LEADER BURLAP PLANTING NOTES: -All plant material is to be Florida Number 1 or better pursuant to the Florida Department of Agriculture's Grades and Standards for Nursery Plants. -All plants are to be top dressed with a minimum 3" layer of Melaleuca mulch, Eucalyptus mulch or equal. Cypress mulch shall not be used. -Planting plans shall take precedence over plant list in case of discrepancies. -No changes are to be made without the prior consent of the Landscape Architect and Owner. Additions and or deletions to the plant material must be approved by the project engineer. -Landscape Contractor is responsible for providing their own square footage takeoffs and field verification for 100% sod coverage for all areas specified. - All landscape areas are to be provided with automatic sprinkler system which provide 100% coverage, and 50% overlap. - All trees in lawn areas are to receive a 24" diameter mulched saucer at the base of the trunk. - Trees are to be planted within parking islands after soil is brought up to grade. Deeply set root balls are not acceptable. - Planting soil for topsoil and backfill shall be 50/50 mix, nematode free. Planting soil for annual beds to be comprised of 50% Canadian peat moss, 25% salt free coarse sand and 25% Aerolite. - Tree and shrub pits will be supplemented with "Agriform Pells", 21 gram size with a 20-10-5 analysis, or substitute application accepted by Landscape Architect. Deliver in manufacturer's standard containers showing weight, analysis and name of manufacturer. GENERAL NOTES: -The Landscape Contractor is to locate and verify all underground and overhead utilities prior to beginning work. Contact proper utility companies and / or General Contractor prior to digging for field verification. The Owner and the Landscape Architect shall not be responsible for any damages to utility or irrigation lines (see Roadway Plans for more utility notes). -Landscape Contractor is to verify all current drawings and check for discrepancies and bring to the attention of the Landscape Architect prior to commencing with the work. -All unattended and unplanted tree pits are to be properly barricaded and flagged during installation. -All planting plans are issued as directives for site layout. Any deviations, site changes, etcetera are to be brought to the attention of the Landscape Architect for clarification prior to installation. SOD NOTES: -Sod is to be grade "A" weed free. -All areas marked "LAWN" shall be solid sodded with St. Augustine 'Floratam' solid sod. See limit on plan. All areas marked 'Bahia Grass' shall be solid sodded with Paspalum. -Provide a 2" deep blanket of planting soil as described in planting notes this sheet. Prior to planting, remove stones, sticks, etc. from the sub soil surface. Excavate existing non-conforming soil as required so that the finish grade of sod is flush with adjacent pavement or top of curb as well as adjacent sod in the case of sod patching. -Place sod on moistened soil, with edges tightly butted, in staggered rows at right angles to slopes. -Keep edge of sod bed a minimum of 18" away from groundcover beds and 24" away from edge of shrub beds and 36" away from trees, measured from center of plant. -Sod Shall be watered immediatley after installation to uniformily wet the soil to at least 2" below the bottom of the sod strips. -Excavate and remove excess soil so top of sod is flush with top of curb or adjacent pavement or adjacent existing sod. Drawing: Landscape Details LANDSCAPE DETAILSDate: 04/28/2022 Scale: See Left Drawn by: MAV Sheet No.: L-3 Cad Id.: 2022-0406075 SUNSET DRIVESOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 33143 Z:\2022\Mixed Use\6075 Sunset - 2022-040\Landscape\2022.08.24\L-2.dwg Aug 24, 2022307 south 21st avenue hollywood, floridaphone: 954.923.9681 facsimile: 954.923.9689www.witkindesign.comSeal: Lic. # LA0000889 Member: A.S.L.A.Project:Revisions:By:Date: ©2020 WITKIN HULTS + PARTNERS THE DESIGN AND DRAWINGS HEREIN ARE THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OF THIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND ARE PROTECTED UNDER THE COPYRIGHT PROTECTION ACT 07.06.20221) CGA – 1ST REVIEW MAV 1 08.24.20222) Submittal #5 MAV 298 CAFE LEASING RETAIL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TYP. TREE CANOPY7.5' RADIUSNORTH Scale: 1"=20'-0" AERIAL Drawing: AERIAL Date: 07/01/2022 Scale: See Left Drawn by: MAV Sheet No.: L-4 Cad Id.: 2022-0406075 SUNSET DRIVESOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 33143 AERIALZ:\2022\Mixed Use\6075 Sunset - 2022-040\Landscape\2022.08.24\L-1.dwg Aug 24, 2022307 south 21st avenue hollywood, floridaphone: 954.923.9681 facsimile: 954.923.9689www.witkindesign.comSeal: Lic. # LA0000889 Member: A.S.L.A.Project:Revisions:By:Date: ©2020 WITKIN HULTS + PARTNERS THE DESIGN AND DRAWINGS HEREIN ARE THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OF THIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND ARE PROTECTED UNDER THE COPYRIGHT PROTECTION ACT 07.06.20221) CGA – 1ST REVIEW MAV 08.24.20222) Submittal #5 MAV 299 08/24/2022300 08/24/2022301 08/24/2022302 08/24/2022303 08/24/2022304 08/24/2022305 306I I I 1! ------•-. I I ~~~ -~ . .. " _;;--... .iJ"I'fflffl'rnnT Cl ,/ -" ... immmu -i-, --'I o ._·_~\~ -mrnrr .$-a .• O·. li!j . ~-I ~ I .~I NORTH . ~ I ~--1 -1--17:T I L:Ll~--1 I-Ililli 3.2 I 3.4 3.1 + -+ -3.2 -3.4----3.5--314 ' 3.1 3.4 \ ---. /'" ,' "I \ ·1.9i 2:~ ·, 3.7 3.5 + 9 9 ·----. __ 1 3 22 2.7 it\ LIGHTING DETAIL ,, _ _/ 111111111_ -3. 3.5 3.7 I I I I I I ~ -I I I I I I I I I ' ' ' 0.7 3.6 I 3.3 I-LP-4 ! 3.5 SCALE:%"= 1'-0" -111 I 11 I I l3ill 11~ I I Blil 11~ --1 I Blll I 8!l!I 11~ --ejll I I Blll --1 I Blil I I Bl!! -~ IIIBlil 11~ --1 I 81!1 I I Blil ' --2_J I r + 2.5 (?;:::\\ /·-::~-'.0-.\ 2.7 ... \... ,!!. · . \)._ ( \, ___ / ' ' 2.9 2.9 +,.,,,-----,,.-, (·..:;:· ,.3,9~2,~• /_, ./<":-:<s? .. !', -\ \, / _... I I ~~Yr I ' ' . / . ' ·,. : . ...::</··~ <'/.,__ 3.3 3.1 2.8 '+ 3!,6-' 3.6 + 3.5 ' 3.0 ' 2.4 + 1.9 lillEl I \~! lliE I llEI I lliE I lllEl I llEI I lillEl I llEI I llEI I ~1 !ilEl I ~11 ~1 !ilEl I l!IEl I lmEl I I lmEl I l!IEl I ' 3.9 0 4.1 4.0 4.3 3.3 3.7 3.9 ' 4.0 ' 3.4 T-r--1 i.k/ ~-3 ,. 2.6'-.._.3_..o •.. ><. + 3.4--l,3-----+ 3.5 2.4 ~-. 4.5 /'" / 5.9 1.5 I 3.6 ' 4.0 -'<f·'" 5.2 -□ ,i{' 7' ll ' ' . ., ' ., ' ' ' • '' a 4.1 J~~~~f< + 2,8 2.8 ,6 I l.7 I JJJHJIIIII. I I n iA LIGHTING DETAIL . ' SCALE:;~"= l'-0" 21 ll.L-,l!-J I ' -. ;o;i;< -I I .;c,,\'1 --:yi,;,., ,f"-";, ,-,;<\ " -\f P~~ ''"""' 1l; C :::, I ' l'(:g'J 3.0 2. -o--,, ·LP,2 . -. + 3.0 + 3,0 +. /2,9 ' + 2.8 + 12.7 I ·-2.8 r ' 2.4 L..---.__J, D --. ---" -. ' ------) -L " " I . I =r= =r =r =r= =r =r =r =r _JJIIIIIJ I , ' ' 18 LIGHTING DETAIL \ __ / -·-+ 3.4 4.2 ' 4.0 ' 1, 4.5 o ___ .. 4.5 t.s T ·LP-6 '· _.,•·"','•,f 3.9 4.4 4.6 4.2 __J 4~.3 \ ' 4.3~ 4.3 • I I • , + i:::-+ I 3.6 . 3. 3. 7 ... 3.6 • I 3.9 4.2 3.6 I r~ I +· 2.3 + 3.1 ' 3.9 + 3.6 I SCALE: ~•a"= 1'-0" 2.3 3.1 3.8 ' 3.7 4.2 ·LP-7 ' 4.1 ·1 ·, u[_ " ~-; '1 + 2.8 -I 'ti 2.6 • _.,.4 ' 3.4 3.2 ' 3.0 + 3.8 + 3.4 3.7 ' 3.4 + 2.9 LUMINAIRE DEFINITION LUMINAIRE: DESCRIPTION ATTRIBUTES GRLF3_P20_27K_XXXXX_SYM GRLF3 P20 27K XXXXX SYM FILENAME [MANUFAC] [LUMCAT] PHOTOMETRY ARRANGEMENT LUMINAIRE LU MENS LUMINAIRE LUMENS LUMINAIRE WATTS ARRANGEMENT WATTS LUMINAIRE EFFICIENCY(%) S/P RATIO GRLF3_P20_27K_XXXXX_SYM.IES HOLOPHANE GRLF3 P20 27K XXXXX SYM 6342 6342 51 51 N.A. 1.00 1.000 TOTAL LIGHT LOSS FACTOR ROAD CLASSIFICATION TYPE VS, INDOOR CLASSIFICATION VERY SHORT, N.A. (DEPRECATED) DIRECT LER UPWARD WASTE LIGHT RATIO MAXUGR BUG RATING CONTROL: 124 0.00 31.B B3-U0-G1 PR7:7 PIN NEMA PHOTOCONTROL RECEPTACLE, SH:SHORTING CAP, HSS:HOUSE SHIELD(GBLF3HSS) CALCULATION SUMMARY LIGHTING DETAIL "A" ILLUMINANCE (FC) AVERAGE 3.35 AVG/MIN 3.72 MAX/MIN 5.44 LIGHTING DETAIL "B" ILLUMINANCE (FC) AVERAGE 2.79 AVG/MIN 1.21 MAX/MIN 1.30 LIGHTING DETAIL "C" ILLUMINANCE (FC) AVERAGE 4.10 AVG/MIN 2.73 MAX/MIN 4.00 LIGHTING DESIGN CRITERIA AVERAGE INITIAL INTENSITY 2-5 FC AVG/MIN 4.0:1 MAX/MIN 10.0:1 ABBREVIATION LEGEND LP-# LIGHT POLE# I I I ... I 2.5 3.0 3.2 ' 3.4 3.6 ' 3.7 3.9 + 4.0 3.6 . •, ' 3.3 ' 3.8 4.0 3.8 4.2 ' 4.2 ' 3.7 3.8 \ .--'n .,-, r--._ 3.5 _3;6 ·. \ 3.8 3.8 ~7 3.5 3.3 3.i 3.t --.-~-----1. ~· ti I ·---·· -3.0 '.3_,i 3.4 n-.; -3.4 .:,,3 ... 3--""3=.oi--c=-.. 2 ... 1~·~,:-4·_c2cc,.s--·-"::2.ys;_,.1_ I 4.6 4.5 4.0 3.3 2.6 .--DUAL LED LIGHT FIXTURE BRACKET ARM HOUSE SIDE SHIELD TO BE INSTALLED AT ALL LOCATIONS FACING ADJACENT PROPERTIES LIGHT POLE DETAIL N.T.S. LIGHT POLE CLEARANCE DETAIL N.T.S. I ~1 ----,:w: u LP-9 + + 4. 4.0 ' 4.7 4.7 ' ' 4.5 ---4.0 .. ' 2.8 2.2 + 4.7 + 3.1 ' 3.6 3.9 ' ' 3 .. 9 3.8 + + + + 2.9 _.......,.3;,:.l--,---:i3,;;;.3_.,. 3.2 3.0 2.6 I I I I \:·,-:.11.s r ' ,1 FT SISIIS . . • I ' w > -c::: ._, -0 -LL -f" . I-_L -' /'°' ~ ·. ~ w -~ ,.. '·1 re -. I I ~ Cl) f-. • ' n z u. :r: ,--) ::J __J f-X -, -Cl) l . ,,, ,"-I LO r----0 co SEAL: l'i:::\;,..'-_J,t,.. =:, I\-' !'>, T.A H ::: ~ :Y~ P, \]:; 77970 •. Lt) Lt) co ..... 0 . co (.) co 0 0 C: r---co -0 <ll en '<t ~ Q) ..... ::J '<t + en (.) C") .....: -"'"'"" C: -<ll C") co (.) C") Q) 0 .!::: ..J Cl) N (.) IL N . ctl -• ..... L.. Cl) Cl) C") ..c <ll co E ..c . ::::, Lt) ctl ctl 0 ..c C, C") <( C. ..... ~ >< + ..... 0 0 G) -N (.) -· () .:•. -;~ l;R<Y,,1.1 [;,C-[ ~ en . => () / ..... 0 r---a, N .. ..c -::J <( -0 t:: <ll (.) -E 0 u . 0. >< G) I Bv ; EC Hl/'-.-220 7-182 S-IEET Tl--_E. PHOTOMETRIC PLAN L-1.1 ::.__·, ~ _, ~ z ~ (/) :::, (/) • w 0:: :::, f-u :::, 0:: f-~ u. z • _, ~ t:; :::, 0 z • ~ w z w • f-z w :, z 5! s: z w ... J: ~ i1i • (/) (!) z 0 _, 5 [D 1 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING BOARD Special Meeting Minutes Excerpt Tuesday, July 26, 2022 CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS 07:00 P.M. The City of South Miami Code of Ordinances, Section 8A -5, requires that all lobbyists, as defined in that section, must register with the City Clerk before engaging in any lobbying activities and in most cases pay an annual fee of $500.00 and an additional $100 for each additional issue. This applies to all persons who are retained with or without compensation to influence any action, decision, recommendation of someone with the city, including the city manager, city attorney, department heads, city personnel, or members of the city commission or members of any city board, concerning a matter that could foresee ably be address by the city commission or a city board. There are some exceptions and exemptions. The following are not considered to be lobbyist: a representative of a principal at a quasi-judicial hearing, experts who present scientific or technical in formation at public meetings, representatives of a neighborhood association without compensation and representatives of a not-for-profit community based organization for the purpose of requesting a grant who seek to influence without special compensation. Individuals who wish to view or listen to the meeting in its entirety, audio and video versions of the meeting can be found on the city’s website (www.southmiamifl.gov). I. Call to Order Action: Ms. Bonich called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. Mr. Pepe provided the Board and public with the rules for the meeting. II. Roll Call Board Members Present Constituting a Quorum: Ms. Lisa Bonich (Chairperson), Mr. Jay Miller (Vice- Chairperson), Mr. Lee Jacobs, Mr. Subrata Basu, Mrs. Michelle Readon, and Ms. Guirla H. Dodard. Board Members Absent: Mr. Orlando Borges City Staff Present: Mr. Mark Alvarez (Interim Planning Director), Mr. Alex David (Planning Consultant, Calvin, Giordano, and Associates), and Mr. Marcus Lightfoot (Senior Planner/Zoning Administrator). City Staff Absent: None. City Attorney: Mr. Thomas Pepe, Esq. III. Administrative Matters 1. Introduction of Mark Alvarez, Interim Planning Director Ms. Bonich introduced Mr. Mark Alvarez as the Interim Planning Director to the Board. 307 2 2. Chair & Vice Chair Elections Ms. Bonich requested nominations for Chair of the Planning Board. Ms. Bonich then nominated Mr. Jay Miller as the Chair of the Planning Board. Motion: Ms. Bonich moved to elect Mr. Jay Miller as Chair of the Planning Board. The motion was seconded by Ms. Dodard. Vote: Yes 5, No 0 (None) Ms. Dodard: Yes Ms. Bonich: Yes Mr. Miller: Yes Mr. Jacobs: Yes Mrs. Readon: Yes Mr. Basu: Absent The motion to elect Mr. Jay Miller as Chair of the Planning Board was unanimously approved by the Board. Mr. Miller, assuming the position of Chair, asked if there were any issues with Ms. Bonich being the Vice-Chair of the Board. Mr. Pepe responded that it was a different office so there wouldn’t be any issues. Mr. Miller nominated Ms. Lisa Bonich as the Vice Chair of the Planning Board. Mr. Jacobs then nominated Mrs. Michelle Readon as the Vice Chair of the Planning Board. Mr. Subrata Basu joined the meeting after the vote for Chair was held. Motion: Mr. Miller moved to elect Ms. Lisa Bonich as Vice Chair of the Planning Board. The motion was seconded by Ms. Dodard. Vote: Yes 5, No 2 (Jacobs, Readon, Basu) Ms. Bonich: Yes Ms. Dodard: Yes Mr. Jacobs: No Mrs. Readon: No Mr. Basu: No Mr. Miller: Yes The motion to elect Ms. Lisa Bonich as Vice Chair of the Planning Board resulted in a tie vote. 308 3 Motion: Mr. Jacobs moved to elect Mrs. Readon as Vice Chair of the Planning Board. The motion was seconded by Ms. Dodard. Vote: Yes 5, No 2 (None) Ms. Bonich: No Ms. Dodard: No Mrs. Readon: Yes Mr. Jacobs: Yes Mr. Basu: Yes Mr. Miller: No The motion to elect Ms. Lisa Bonich as Vice Chair of the Planning Board resulted in a tie vote. Because both nominations resulted in a tie vote, Mr. Pepe informed the Board that a Vice Chair was not elected. Mr. Miller then asked if the election could be held at the next meeting, to which Mr. Pepe stated yes. Mr. Pepe also informed the Board that if the Chair is absent, the Board can elect a temporary chair for the meeting. Mr. Miller then chose to table Vice Chair elections until the next meeting. IV. Public Hearings: Mr. Miller asked if both PB-22-011 and PB-22-012 should be reviewed together, to which Mr. Lightfoot stated yes. 1. PB-22-011 Applicant: Maestra Sunset, LLC An Ordinance pursuant to Section 20-5.7 of the Land Development Code providing for a Map Amendment to the City of South Miami Official Zoning Map from Transit-Oriented Development District Mixed-Use 5 (TODD MU-5) to Transit-Oriented Development District Mixed-Use 6 (TODD MU-6) on a 1.6124-acre (70,236 sq. ft.) property located at 6075 Sunset Drive and as legally described herein. 2. PB-22-012 Applicant: Maestra Sunset, LLC A Resolution pursuant to Section 20-8.9 and other provisions of the City of South Miami Land Development Code approving by Special Exception a large-scale development on a 1.6124-acre (70,236 sq. ft.) property located at 6075 Sunset Drive and as legally described herein. Applicant: Maestro Sunset, LLC, represented by Ms. Ines Marrero-Prieques, Esq. (Attorney), Mr. Juan Poleo, and Ms. Anette Nolasco. Mr. Miller read both PB‐22-011 and PB-22-012 into the record. Mr. Miller asked Staff who will be presenting the staff report to the Board, to which Mr. Alvarez responded that Mr. Alex David will be presenting the items on behalf of the City. Mr. David then introduced himself and his team to the Board and presented the staff report for both items to the Board. 309 4 Ms. Bonich asked staff about the location of the property. Mr. Lightfoot assisted Mr. Bonich with the location of the subject property. Mr. Jacobs asked if the City had a policy regarding the number of bike racks that are required for the project. Mr. David responded that he was not sure if there were any minimum requirements for bicycles in the Land Development Code (LDC). Mr. Lightfoot added that he would need to check the LDC to see if there were any regulations. Mr. David responded that the applicant is proposing to provide a bike room with space for 28 bike racks, a changing room, and a repair station. Additionally, over 20 public bike racks outside as well. Mr. Miller asked if the auto turn was used for a turn-around. Mr. David provided the Board with an explanation on the auto turn and then explained why he added a condition on the auto turn. Mr. Miller then asked about the second condition regarding the triangle of visibility. Mr. David then explained the reasoning behind the condition regarding the triangle of visibility as well. Ms. Bonich asked if the exit onto SW 71 Street took the adjacent preschool into account, to which Mr. David stated yes. When the traffic engineer performs her review, uses in the surrounding area are considered. Ms. Dodard asked if the traffic engineer takes current uses or proposed uses into account. Mr. David responded that she takes current uses into account. Mrs. Readon asked what the makeup of the apartments would be. Mr. David responded that the building would have a mixture of one- and two-bedroom units with thirteen different floorplans. Mrs. Readon asked if the building would have any low-income units in the building. Mr. David responded yes and that the project is meeting the City’s requirements for affordable housing. Ms. Marrero, on behalf of the applicant, introduced her team and then gave a presentation to the Board. Ms. Bonich stated that the project was great. Mr. Miller asked what the height would be for the proposed building. Ms. Marrero responded that the building will be approximately 105 feet high. Mr. Miller then asked if the 32 affordable units will be a mixture of one- and two-bedroom units or will they be set at a specific size. Mr. Poleo responded that it will be a mixture of units. Mr. Miller then asked if the mixture of units could change, to which Mr. Poleo stated yes. Ms. Dodard asked if the affordable units will be scattered throughout the building. Mr. Poleo responded that ideally, the units will be scattered throughout the building. Ms. Dodard asked where the flow of traffic be. Ms. Nolasco responded that both the entrance and exit will be located along SW 71st Street. Mr. Miller asked if there are any thoughts on who will be taking the retail spaces on the ground floor. Mr. Poleo responded that there are no prospective tenants but ideally, the spaces could be occupied by coffee shops or a similar use. Ms. Dodard asked if the tenant spaces will have varying sizes, to which Mr. Poleo stated yes. 310 5 Mr. Jacobs asked why the applicant did not take the bonus floor for providing affordable housing. Ms. Marrero-Prieques responded that after performing outreach, there was concern about proposing a 12-story building. Mrs. Readon asked how will families in the larger units that have more than one (1) car be accommodated. Ms. Marrero-Prieques responded that the project will meet the City’s minimum parking space requirement. She also stated that there will be some spaces in the project that will allow for tandem parking even though they are only counted as one (1) parking space. Mrs. Readon then asked if there will be designated parking for the residential units as well as security for those spaces, to which Mr. Poleo stated that the only parking spaces that will be designated will be the tandem and handicap parking spaces. He also stated that there will be a security system with cameras and a gate installed. Ms. Dodard asked how many of the parking spaces will be available for visitor parking. Ms. Marrero-Prieques responded that 10% of the required parking spaces will be for visitor parking in addition to on-street parking spaces. Ms. Jacobs asked the applicant to define what level of service “LOS D+50% on US-1 or E on Sunset Drive” means. The applicant’s traffic consultant, Mr. Richard Garcia, provided an explanation to the Board on level of service standards and their meanings. The Board then held a discussion on the topic with Mr. Garcia. Mrs. Readon asked when the project will commence once it has been approved. Ms. Marrero- Prieques responded that they would like for the project to commence immediately once it has been approved. Mrs. Readon then asked how long the project will take to be built. Mr. Poleo responded that it should take approximately 18 months. The Chairperson opened the floor to public comments on both PB‐22-011 and PB-22-012. • JC Freyre – In Support of the Project The Chairperson closed the floor to public comments on both PB‐22-011 and PB-22-012. The Chair opened the floor to Board discussion. Ms. Bonich stated that she is in support of the project, to which Mr. Miller agreed. Mr. Basu asked what the height was for the previous project that was approved for this site. Mr. David responded that he could not answer the question because he was not involved in the review of the previous project. Mr. Basu responded that the previous project was approved with a height of eight (8) stories. Mr. Basu stated both the future land use and zoning maps that are in the staff report have discrepancies that should be corrected. Mr. David stated that he would look into correcting the discrepancies. 311 6 Mr. Basu stated that the applicant’s rationale for changing the zoning is to build more units. He then asked if there were any other compelling argument for increasing the height of the building, to which there no response. Mr. Basu stated that the application package makes no mention of how many affordable housing units will be provided or how they will be administered. He then stated that he was surprised that there wasn’t a condition to provide the information. Mr. David responded that while the applicant’s letter of intent mentions affordable housing, there are no conditions for it because affordable housing is an LDC requirement. Mr. Miller responded that a condition for approval will be added to the report. Mrs. Readon asked what the approximate cost of a one (1) bedroom and two (2) bedroom unit would be. Mr. Poleo responded that he did not have that information yet but stated that they would be market competitive. With no further discussion, the Board made a motion on the item. Motion: Ms. Bonich moved to approve PB-22-011 as written with the following additional conditions: 1. All tree grates and sidewalk widths meet ADA requirements; 2. The column in the site triangle be addressed or relocated; 3. The auto turn diagrams be corrected; and 4. The project meets the City’s minimum affordable housing requirements listed in Section 20- 8.4(D) of the LDC. The motion was seconded by Ms. Dodard. Vote: Yes 6, No 0 (None) Ms. Bonich: Yes Ms. Dodard: Yes Mrs. Readon: Yes Mr. Basu: Yes Mr. Jacobs: Yes Mr. Miller: Yes The motion to approve PB-22-011 was unanimously approved by the Board. Motion: Ms. Bonich moved to approve PB-22-011 as written with the following additional conditions: 1. All tree grates and sidewalk widths meet ADA requirements; 2. The column in the site triangle be addressed or relocated; 3. The auto turn diagrams be corrected; and 4. The project meets the City’s minimum affordable housing requirements listed in Section 20- 8.4(D) of the LDC. The motion was seconded by Ms. Dodard. 312 7 Vote: Yes 6, No 0 (None) Ms. Bonich: Yes Ms. Dodard: Yes Mrs. Readon: Yes Mr. Basu: Yes Mr. Jacobs: Yes Mr. Miller: Yes The motion to approve PB-22-012 was unanimously approved by the Board. V. Public Comments/New Business The Chairperson opened the floor for public comments and any new business. Public Comments Section There were no Public Comments. New Business Section Mr. Basu stated that the City should create an overall master plan that includes the downtown area, the previous CRA designated area and the US-1 corridor so that the City does not continue reviewing large scale development projects on a per site basis. There should be an overall vision of the area. Mr. Miller agreed with the comment and stated that he believed that Commissioner Corey was looking into that project. Ms. Bonich stated that the City now has affordable housing stock that consists of the Madison Square project and the Related project as well. She also stated that Miami-Dade County Public Schools is looking into demolishing the J.R. Lee school so that more affordable housing can be built. Ms. Bonich then stated that the City must be aware of the affordable housing that will be available. Mr. Jacobs stated that applicant can get a whole floor with the bicycle bonus with very little reward for the City. The Board then decided that the bonus needs some type of clarification. Mrs. Readon asked if the developer would hire local population to work on the construction of the project. Both Mr. Miller and Ms. Bonich stated that they did not know if the developer will hire from the community. The Chairperson closed the floor for public comments and any new business. VI. Approval of the Minutes 1. Planning Board Regular Meeting Minutes of April 12, 2022: Motion: Ms. Bonich moved to approve the meeting minutes as presented. The motion was seconded by Ms. Dodard. Vote: Yes 6, No 0 (None) Ms. Bonich: Yes 313 8 Ms. Dodard: Yes Mrs. Readon: Yes Mr. Basu: Yes Mr. Jacobs: Yes Mr. Miller: Yes The motion to approve the meeting minutes was unanimously approved by the Board. VII. Future Meeting Date: August 9, 2022 VIII. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 8:27 P.M. 314 315 MIAMI-D A D E STATE OF FLORIDA COUN TY OF MI AMI-DADE : Before the unde rsigned authority personally appeared GUILLERMO GARCIA , who on oath says that he or she is the DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS , Legal Notices of the Miami Daily Busin ess Review 1/k/a Miami Review , a daily (except Saturday , Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami in Miami-Dade County, Flo ri da ; that the attached copy of adver1isement, be ing a Legal Advertisement of Notice in the matter of CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI -PUBLIC HEARINGS -SEPT . 6, 2022 in the XXXX Court , was publis hed in sa id newspaper by print in the issues of and/o r by publicati on on the newspa pe~s websi te, If au tho ri zed, on 08/26/2022 Afflant further says tha t the newspaper comp lies wit h all legal for publication in ch apter 50, Flor ida Swo r and subscribed before me this 26 day of AUGUST , A.D. 2022 a>e~ (S EA L) GU ILLE RMO GARC IA personally known to me '---~:tf~~?~~\ CHRl~TINA LYNN RAVIX f•:· ,., Comnussion t/GG 2Tmt -.,_~-,.,_;_ ..... j): Ex,oires Nov am ber 19 2022 ·•"'o,, ... o,.... Bo • ••,,.,,.,,. ndcd Thru Troy F1Jn Insurance 9~5.7019 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA CITY COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS In order to ba lance the need for the City of South Miami to function and conduct vital business during the COVID 19 pandemic and, at the same time , to protect the health , safety and welfare of its citizens , officers, officials and administrative staff, and pursuant City of South Miami Code, Chapter 286.011, Fla. Stat, the City's Home Rule Powers, and City Manager's decla ration of a state of emergency due to the Coronavirus, the City will be hol ding its City Commission Meeting live in chambers and VIRTUALLY through communications media technology (CMT) until the state of emergency has ended or social distancing is no longer required by any relevant Executive Orders. All Commission members will participate in Chambers or by video conferencing through the Zoom platform and members of the public may join the meeting via Zoom at (!lit s://zoom.usf'J!'.3056636338) and participate. At a minimum, at least three members of the City Commission will be physically present in the City Commission Chambers1 and they will be broadcast on the Zoom platform along with all other members of the Commission , City Staff and the public who may attend remotely from the Commission Chambers and from other locations. The meeting is scheduled to begin on Tuesday ~tember 6., 2022 at 7:00 .m. to consider the following public hearing item(s): A Resolution approving and authorizing the City Manager to execute a three-year collective bargaining agreement (Lieutenants and Captains) between the Miami Dade County Police Benevolent Association and the City of South Miami. A Resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into a multi-year contract with AireSpring, the City's provider of citywide Sf P phone service, adding a redundant Velo cloud box for a term not to exceed thirty-six (36) months. A Resoluti on pursuant to Sect ion 20-8.9 and other provisions of the City of South Miami Land Development Code approving by Special Exception a large-scale development on a 1.6124-acre property located at 6075 Sunset Drive and as legally described herein . An Ordinance pursuant to Section 20-5. 7 of the Land Develop- ment Code providing for a Map Amendment to the City of South Miami Official Zoning Map from Transit-Oriented Development District Mixed-Use 5 (fODD MU -5) to Transit-Oriented Development District Mixed-Use 6 (fODD MU-6) on a 1.6124-acre (70,236 sq. ft .) property located at 6075 Sunset Drive and as legally described herein . 316 An Ordinance establishing an electric franchise with Florida Power & Light Company for the construction, installation, and powering of new LED streetlights within the City of South Miami, including at Paseo Park. If you desire to pres ent evidence or you are unable to use Zoom, there are procedures to follow and other options available Including a dedicated phone line to listen and participate in the meeting and limited public attendance, all of which is set forth in the meeting notice posted at City Hall and at htt ://www.southmiamifl. ov/580/Public-Meetin s-Notlces. Anyone who wishes to rev iew pending application , supporting documentation or who desire to have documents made avallable for viewing by everyone during the meeting must contact the City Clerk by calling 305-663-6340. Note that pursuant to Florida Statutes 286.0105, a person who decides to appeal any decision made by a Board, Agency or Commiss ion with respect to any matter considered at its meeting or hearing, a record of the proceedings will be required for said appeal and such person will be required to have a verbatim transcript of the proceedings including the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. ADA: To request a modification to a policy, practice or procedure or to re- quest an auxiliary aide or service in order to part icipate In a City program, activity or event, you must on or before 4:00 p.m. 3 business days before the meeting (not counting the day of the meeting) deliver your request to the City Clerk by telephone : 305-663-6340, by mall at 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida or email at npayne@southmiamifl.gov. Nkenga A. Payne, CMC, FCRM City Clerk 1 The minimum standards for adopting a resolution or enacting an ordinance are set forth in 166.041 (4) •-A majority of the members of the governing body shall constitute a quorum. An affinnative vote of a majority of a quorum present is necessary to enact any ordinance or adopt any resolution. ~ 8/26 22 -73/0000616811 M SUNDAY AUGUST 28 2022 NEIGHBORS ...................................................................................................17SE 317 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA NOTICE OF SPECIAL ELECTION AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY CHARTER NOVEMBER 8, 2022 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Special Election for the City of South Miami will be held on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, in conjunction with the City's General Election . The following five (5) questions will appear on the ballot Embliah■1nt If I au1ermalarity Commlulen ntln1 r"luirtment far 1111 restrictlil Citywide IHI us9/lnel1pmenl rB1ulllio111 Shall City Charter Article 11, Section 6.D.1. (Requiring unanimous voting for land use and development regulations in areas other than the Commercial Core of the City) be amended to enable the City Commission 10 make Citywide land use and development regulations less restrictive by a supennajority (Four out of Five) vote? Yes No Rllllucli11 In the n,mber If r"luirtd Commlulon melfin1s uch month Shall City Charter Article 11, Section 5, Subsection C be amended to give the City Commission more flexibility in scheduling meetings by only requiring one mandatory Commission meeting each month during the months of November through January and June through August? Yes No Embliah■ent If a IGUr1ear ler11 of office llr fhe City Mayer Shall City Charter Article V, Section 2 titled "General Elections" paragraph A. be amended to increase the term of office of the Mayor from two years to four years? Yes No Authorizing City Olic11 anl De11r111111s intamal fund lrmflrs threughout the facal ,.., will! Commission 1,PrDVII Shall City Charter Article IV, Section 2, Subsection F be amended 10 allow internal fund transfer of appropriations between City offices and departments (currently restricted to the last three months of the fiscal year) throughout the Fiscal year with Commission approval? Yes No Embliahing 11111 inslalllliDI ol elected lfficials is 6 p.■. Iha busin11s day folllllin1 election clflificalion Shall City Charier Article V, and Section 5. C. be amended lo correct a conflict in the procedure lor installation ol elected oflicials by changing the date, and time, from 8 p.m. the day afler the election lo 6 p.m. on the bu~ness day following the certification of election results? Yes No Inquiries can be made by calling in the City Clerk's office at: 305663-6340. For further information regarding the proposed amendments to the City's Charter you mayvisil our website at www.southmiamifl.gov or, you may also visit the Clerk's Oflice Monday-Friday, between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. al 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, FL 33143 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA CITY COMMISSION NOTICE OF FIRST BUDGET HEARING Nkenga A. Payne, CMC, FCRM City Clerk City of South Miami In order to balance the need for the City of South Miami to function and conduct vital business during the COVID 19 pandemic and , at the same time, to protect the health, safety and welfare of its citizens, officers, officials and administrative staff, and pursuant City of South Miami Code, Chapter 286 .011 , Fla . Stat, the City's Home Rule Powers , and City Manager's declaration of a state of emergency due to the Coronavirus, the City will be holding its City Commission Meeting live in chambers and VIRTUALLY through communications media technology (CMn until the state of emergency has ended or social distancing is no longer required by any relevant Executive Orders. All Commission members will participate in Chambers or by video conferencing through the Zoom platform and members of the public may join the meeting via Zoom at (https ://zoom .us/j/3056636338) and participate . At a minimum, at least three members of the City Commission will be physically present in the City Commission Chambers 1 and they will be broadcast on the Zoom platform along with all other members of the Commission , City Staff and the public who may attend remotely from the Commission Chambers and from other locations. The meeting is scheduled to begin on Tuesday. September 6. 2022 116:00 p.m. to consider the following public hearing item(s): An Ordinance of the City of South Miami, located in Miam~Oade County, Rorida, aP,roving a tentative millage rate for the fiscal year commencing October I, 2022, through September 30, 2023 ("fiscal year 2022/2023 "1 which amount may be amended at the first or second reading, and approving and enacting the final millage rate of the City on second reading. An Ordinance of the City of South Miami ("Cily"I, located in Miami-Dade County, Florida, approving a proposed budget for the City for the fiscal year commencing October I, 2022, through September 30, 2023, including the salaries and expenses ol the City's officers, and which budgeted amount may be amended at the first or second reading of this Ordinance, and approving and enacting the final budget on second reading. If you desire to present evidence or you are unable to use Zoom, there are procedures to follow and other options available including a dedicated phone line to listen and participate in the meeting and limited public attendance, all of which is set forth in the meeting notice posted at City Hall and at http ://www.southmiamifl .gov/580/Public-Meetings-Notices. Anyone who wishes to review pending application , supporting documentation or who desire to have documents made available for viewing by everyone during the meeting must contact the City Clerk by calling 305-663-6340. Note that pursuant to Florida Statutes 286 .0105, a person who decides to appeal any decision made by a Board, Agency or Commission with respect to any matter considered at its meeting or hearing, a record of the proceedings will be required for said appeal and such person will be required to have a verbatim transcript of the proceedings including the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based . ADA : To request a modification to a policy, practice or procedure or to request an auxiliary aide or service in order to participate in a City program , activity or event, you must on or before 4:00 p.m. 3 business days before the meeting (not counting the day of the meeting) deliver your request to the City Clerk by telephone: 305-663-6340, by mail at 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida or email at npayne@southmiamifl.gov. Nkenga A. Payne, CMG, FCRM City Clerk "The minimum standards for adopting a resolution or enacting an ordinance are set forth in 166.041(4) ... A majority of the members of the governing body shall constitute a quorum. An affirmative vote of a majority of a quorum present is necessary to enact any ordinance or adopt any resolution."'** CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA CITY COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS In order to balance the need for the City of South Miami to function and conduct vital business during the COVID 19 pandemic and, at the same time, to protect the health, safety and welfare of its citizens, officers, officials and administrative staff, and pursuant City of South Miami Code. Chapter 286 .011. Fla . Stat , the City's Home Rule Powers, and City Manager's declaration of a state of emergency due to the Coronavirus, the City will be holding its City Commission Meeting live in chambers and VIRTUALLY through communications media technology (GMT) until the state of emergency has ended or social distancing is no longer required by any relevant Executive Orders. All Commission members will participate in Chambers or by video conferencing through the Zoom platform and members of the public may join the meeting via Zoom at (https://zoom.us/j/3056636338) and participate. At a minimum, at least three members of the City Commission will be physically present in the City Commission Chambers 1 and they will be broadcast on the Zoom platform along with all other members of the Commission, City Staff and the public who may attend remotely from the Commission Chambers and from other locations . The meeting is scheduled to begin on Tuesday. September 6. 2022. at 7:00 p.m. to consider the following public hearing item(s): A Resolution approving and authorizing the City Manager to execute a three-year collective bargaining agreement (Lieutenants and Captains) between the Miami Dade County Police Benevolent Association and the City of South Miami . A Resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into a multi-year contract with AireSpring, the City's provider of citywide SIP phone service, adding a redundant Velo cloud box for a term not to exceed thirty-six (36) months . A Resolution pursuantto Section 20-8 .9 and other provisions of the City of South Miami Land Development Code approving by Special Exception a large-scale development on a 1.6124-acre property located at 6075 Sunset Drive and as legally described herein . An Ordinance pursuant to Section 20-5.7 of the Land Development Code providing for a Map Amendment to the City of South Miami Official Zoning Map from Transit-Oriented Development District Mixed-Use 5 (TODD MU-5) to Transit-Oriented Development District Mixed-Use 6 (TODD MU-6) on a 1.6124-acre (70,236 sq . ft .) property located at 6075 Sunset Drive and as legally described herein . An Ordinance establishing an electric franchise with Florida Power & Light Company for the construction, installation, and powering of new LED streetlights within the City of South Miami, including at Paseo Park . If you desire to present evidence or you are unable to use Zoom, there are procedures to follow and other options available including a dedicated phone line to listen and participate in the meeting and limited public attendance, all of which is set forth in the meeting notice posted at City Hall and at http ://www.southmiamifl .gov/580/Public-Meetinqs-Notices . Anyone who wishes to review pending application, supporting documentation or who desire to have documents made available for viewing by everyone during the meeting must contact the City Clerk by calling 305-663-6340 . Note that pursuant to Florida Statutes 286 .0105, a person who decides to appeal any decision made by a Board , Agency or Commission with respect to any matter considered at its meeting or hearing, a record of the proceedings will be required for said appeal and such person will be required to have a verbatim transcript of the proceedings including the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based . ADA : To request a modification to a policy, practice or procedure or to request an auxiliary aide or service in order to participate in a City program, activity or event, you must on or before 4:00 p.m. 3 business days before the meeting (not counting the day of the meeting) deliver your request to the City Clerk by telephone : 305-663-6340, by mail at 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida or email at npayne@southmiamifl.gov. Nkenga A. Payne, CMG, FCRM City Clerk 'The minimum standards for adopting a resolution or enacting an ordinance are set forth in 166.041(4) •••A majority of the members of the governing body shall constitute a quorum . An affirmative vote of a majority of a quorum present is necessary to enact any ordinance or adopt any resolution:••