7Agenda Item No:7.
City Commission Agenda Item Report
Meeting Date: December 1, 2020
Submitted by: Marcus Lightfoot
Submitting Department: Planning & Zoning Department
Item Type: Resolution
Agenda Section:
Subject:
A Resolution relating to a Waiver of Plat request to allow a subdivision of property located at 5907 SW 80 Street
and as legally described herein. 4/5 (City Manager-Planning Dept.)
Suggested Action:
Attachments:
5907 SW 80 Street Waiver of Plat CM Staff Report.docx
Res_Waiver_of_Plat_5907_SW_80_Street - Revised .docx
PB-20-017 Documents.pdf
Fiinal PB Regular Meeting Minutes - 09-14-2020.pdf
5907 SW 80 Street Waiver of Plat Conceptual Plans 10-27-2020.pdf
Miami Herald Ad.pdf
MDBR Ad.pdf
1
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission
VIA:Shari Kamali, City Manager
FROM:Jane K. Tompkins, Planning and Zoning Director
DATE:November 17, 2020
SUBJECT:
A Resolution relating to a Waiver of Plat request to allow a subdivision of property located at 5907
SW 80 Street and as legally described herein.
BACKGROUND:
On August 7, 2020, an application for Waiver of Plat was filed by the applicant/property owner,
5907 SW 80th Street, LLC, in order to re-plat the existing single-family residential parcel located
at 5907 SW 80th Street into two (2) single family parcels (Lot 1 and Lot 2) as described below. The
property currently has a one-story single-family residence fronting SW 80th Street with several
brick walkways and an accessory structure at the rear of the property.
REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting approval through the Waiver of Plat process as provided in Section
20-4.2 of the City’s Land Development Code (LDC), to subdivide the existing parcel into two (2)
separate parcels of land with the intent of constructing two (2) new single-family residences.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PARENT TRACT
TRACT 7, OF REVISED PLAT OF A PORTION OF THE AMENDED PLAT OF PALM MIAMI HEIGHTS,
ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 43, AT PAGE 37, OF THE
PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PROPOSED LOT 1
THE SOUTH 80 FEET OF THE NORTH 180 FEET OF THE EAST 152 FEET OF TRACT 7, OF REVISED
PLAT OF A PORTION OF THE AMENDED PLAT OF PALM MIAMIHEIGHTS,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 43, AT PAGE 37, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE
COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 12,160.5 S.F., MORE OR LESS.
2
5907 SW 80 Street – Waiver of Plat Request
November 17, 2020
Page 2 of 9
JKT/mwl
C:\Users\EASYPD~1\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@F00F75C0\@BCL@F00F75C0.docx
PROPOSED LOT 2
THE EAST 152 FEET, LESS THE NORTH 180 FEET, OF TRACT 7, OF REVISED PLAT OF A PORTION OF
THE AMENDED PLAT OF PALM MIAMI HEIGHTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF,AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 43, AT PAGE 37,OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
CONTAINING 14,727 S.F., MORE OR LESS.
ANALYSIS:
Located in the Low Density Single-Family Residential (RS-3) zoning district, the intent of the
proposed waiver of plat application is to subdivide the parcel of land located at 5907 SW 80th
Street into two (2) separate parcels of land (Lot “1” and Lot “2”). As required by the LDC, the
applicant has provided a conceptual site plan, sheet 5907 SP, for the City to review. Pursuant to
Section 20-4.2 of the LDC, the proposed subdivision must meet the minimum requirements for
the RS-3 zoning district. As shown in the Table 1 below, the two (2) proposed parcels at this
location are consistent with the dimensional requirements for the RS-3 zoning district.
Table 1: RS-3 Dimensional Requirements Table
RS-3
Minimum
Requirements
Existing
Parcel
Lot 1
(Proposed)
Lot 2
(Proposed
Lot Size
(SF)10,000 26,877 14,727 12,160
Frontage
(Ft.)75 127.21 127.21 80
Pursuant to the amended Section 20-4.2(B)(2)(a)(i) of the LDC,
The building site created by the proposed waiver of plat, tentative or final plat,
should be equal to or larger than the median of the existing building sites in the
Surrounding area (this shall be demonstrated using copies of the official plat maps
for the subject property and surrounding neighborhood), unless otherwise
permitted by this ordinance. Surrounding area is defined as all lots within the same
zoning district and within five hundred (500) feet from the exterior boundaries of
the subject property.
As required by the LDC section listed above, a review of the lot sizes and frontages of the
surrounding area was performed. As such, the outcome of that review can be found in Table 2
below.
3
5907 SW 80 Street – Waiver of Plat Request
November 17, 2020
Page 3 of 9
JKT/mwl
C:\Users\EASYPD~1\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@F00F75C0\@BCL@F00F75C0.docx
Table 2: Waiver of Plat Median Analysis Table
Surrounding
Area
Lot 1 Lot 2
Net Lot Area/
Buildable Site (SF)14,038.0 14,727 12,160
Lot Frontage (Ft.)101.730 127 80
When looking at the neighborhood surrounding the proposed subdivision, it was found that the
lot sizes and frontages of only one (1) of the proposed lots exceeded the median of the
surrounding area. Pursuant to Section 20-4.2(B)(2)(a)(ii) of the LDC,
The City Commission may, in its discretion, approve a subdivision of land into lots
that are included as part of a waiver of plat, tentative or final plat and that have
lot frontage or lot area that is less than the Surrounding area median, provided it
is approved by four votes of the City Commission and provided that at least the
minimum requirements of the Land Development Code are satisfied.
That said, as long as the project meets the minimum requirements of the RS-3 zoning district, the
City Commission may approve the project even though it does not meet the surrounding area
median. For more information on the median buildable site/lot size and the median frontage for
the surrounding area, please refer to the attached exhibit, 500 Foot Waiver of Plat Analysis for
5907 SW 80th Street.
Currently there is an existing single-family residence on the property. Pursuant to Section 20-
4.2(B)(2)(b),
The building site created by the proposed waiver of plat, tentative or final plat, will
not result in existing structures becoming nonconforming as they relate to
setbacks, lot area, lot width and depth, ground coverage and other applicable
regulations of the City's Land Development Code and/or City's Code of Ordinances,
except as permitted by this ordinance. Compliance with this provision may occur
by demolition or relocation of existing structures.
Because it is the intent of the property owner to redevelop the site, all existing structures and
impervious surfaces on the site will be demolished. In its place will be two (2) new two-story
single-family residences that will both include a driveway, walkway, swimming pool, and water
gardens. Pursuant to Section 20-4.2(B)(4) of the LDC, the applicant has provided a conceptual
site plan, sheet 5907 SP, that details the building footprints, setbacks, yard requirements, and
any easements. Because the applicant is proposing to build two-story single-family residences on
both of the proposed lots, staff has reviewed both of the conceptual site plans against the City’s
4
5907 SW 80 Street – Waiver of Plat Request
November 17, 2020
Page 4 of 9
JKT/mwl
C:\Users\EASYPD~1\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@F00F75C0\@BCL@F00F75C0.docx
RS-3 dimensional requirements for two-story single-family residences that are listed in Section
20-3.5(H) of the LDCand found that both residences were in compliance with the LDC regulation.
That review can be found in both Table 3 and Table 4 below.
Table 3: Waiver of Plat Setback Analysis Table - Lot 1
RS-3
Minimum
Requirement
Lot 1
Front Setback (Ft.)25 27.50
Rear Setback (Ft.)25 27.50
Side Interior Setback:
First Floor (Ft.)
10 18.62
Side Interior Setback:
Second Floor (Ft.)15 18.62
Side Street Setback:
First Floor (Ft.)20 48.62
Floor Side Street Setback:
Second Floor (Ft.)25 48.62
Table 4: Waiver of Plat Setback Analysis Table – Lot 2
RS-3
Minimum
Requirement
Lot 2
Front Setback (Ft.)25 27.62
Rear Setback (Ft.)25 53.12
North Side Interior Setback:
First Floor Setback (Ft.)10 10.16
North Side Interior:
Second Floor Setback (Ft.)15 32.00
South Side Interior Setback:
First Floor (Ft.)10 15.08
South Side Interior Setback:
Second Floor (Ft.)15 15.08
In addition to meeting the minimum setbacks for the RS-3 zoning district, the project must also
comply with the cumulative lot width as well. Pursuant to Section 20-3.5(H) of the LDC, the
cumulative width of both side yards shall be not less than 20 percent (20%) of the total lot width.
As shown in Table 5 below, it was determined that the project complies with the aforementioned
regulation.
5
5907 SW 80 Street – Waiver of Plat Request
November 17, 2020
Page 5 of 9
JKT/mwl
C:\Users\EASYPD~1\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@F00F75C0\@BCL@F00F75C0.docx
Table 5: Waiver of Plat Cumulative Lot Width Analysis Table
Lot 1 Lot 2
Lot Width (Ft.)127.21 80
Minimum Cumulative
Width (Ft.)25.44 16
Proposed Combined Side
Interior Setback (Ft.)67.24 25.24
Last, the applicant has provided the proposed building coverage and proposed impervious
coverage for both lots, which can be found in both Table 6 and Table 7 below.
Table 6: Waiver of Plat Coverage
Analysis Table – Lot 1
RS-3
Maximum
Requirement
Lot 1
Building Coverage
(SF)4,418 (30%)2,521.97
Impervious Coverage
(SF)5,891 (40%)5,732.20
Floor Area
Ratio (SF)6,627 (45%)4,186.52
Table 7: Waiver of Plat Coverage
Analysis Table – Lot 2
RS-3
Maximum
Requirement
Lot 2
Building Coverage
(SF)3,648 (30%)2,529.91
Impervious Coverage
(SF)4,864 (40%)4,814.91
Floor Area
Ratio (SF)5,472 (45%)3,975.75
Based on the tables listed above, both of the proposed structures will comply with the
dimensional requirements for two-story single-family residences for the RS-3 zoning district. For
6
5907 SW 80 Street – Waiver of Plat Request
November 17, 2020
Page 6 of 9
JKT/mwl
C:\Users\EASYPD~1\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@F00F75C0\@BCL@F00F75C0.docx
reference, the dimensional requirements for the RS-3 zoning district can be found in Section 20-
3.5(H) of the LDC.
The applicant has provided the City with a proposed landscape plan. This includes the Tree Plan,
sheet L-1.0, and the Tree Disposition Legend, sheet L-1.1, which shows the existing trees that will
be affected by the redevelopment of the site. While the Tree Disposition Plan shows all of the
existing trees overlaid directly upon the conceptual site plan, the Tree Disposition Legend
provides a list of all the existing trees on the site as well as the DBH, height, spread, and condition
of each tree. Regarding tree protection, Section 20-4.2(B)(3)(a) of the LDC states the following,
Additional conditions shall ensure the retention of specimen trees for six (6) years
and permanently maintain fifty (50) percent of existing protected tree canopy, but
in no event shall the condition be less restrictive than what is required by the City's
and County's tree ordinance.
Per the Tree Disposition Legend and Table 8 below, more than 50% of the existing non-invasive
protected tree canopy will be preserved on both of the proposed lots. However, the following
trees have been identified as specimen trees and must be retained for at least six (6) years:
3 Live Oak Trees (Tree #12, #18, #27)
2 Seagrape Trees (Tree #3, #38)
1 Pitch Apple Tree (Tree #65)
Table 8: Tree Canopy Removal Calculations Table
Lot 1 Lot 2
Overall Existing Canopy
(SF)14,002 10,822
Invasive Canopy (SF)5,181 4,533
Non-Invasive Canopy 8,821 6,289
50% Non-Invasive Canopy 4,411 3,144
Removed Canopy 967 2,285
Pursuant to the above listed regulation, it will be required that the remaining existing protected
tree canopy be permanently maintained. Additionally, pursuant to Section 20-4.2 (B)(4)(c) of the
LDC, a moratorium has been placed on the removal of any trees on the property until after the
final waiver-of-plat approval has been issued.
Pursuant to Section 20-4.2(C)(1) of the LDC,
Sidewalks, curbs, gutters, drainage and paving shall be installed by the owner or
developer of the abutting parcel in accordance with Chapter 28 of the County Code
7
5907 SW 80 Street – Waiver of Plat Request
November 17, 2020
Page 7 of 9
JKT/mwl
C:\Users\EASYPD~1\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@F00F75C0\@BCL@F00F75C0.docx
and other applicable city requirements, unless such can be and are waived or
deferred by the city commission.
In order to be in compliance with the subsection listed above, the conceptual site plan was
reviewed by representatives of the Public Works Department. As indicated in the email dated
September 8, 2020 from Mr. Aurelio J. Carmenates, P.E., the City does not have any projects
planned for the section of SW 59th Avenue adjacent to the subject property. Mr. Carmenates also
pointed out that SW 80th Street is a road that is maintained by Miami-Dade County, not the City
of South Miami. Because of that, any infrastructure improvements along SW 80th Street will be
determined by Miami-Dade County.
SUMMARY:
Because of the current redevelopment of both the neighborhood and the surrounding area, the
single-family structures that are being proposed in this project would be in keeping with the
developing character of the surrounding neighborhood and SW 80th Street. To aid in shielding
the neighbors that surround the residences, staff required that additional landscaping be planted
in order to mitigate any adverse impacts on those adjacent properties. In an effort to comply
with this condition, the applicant has provided a preliminary landscape plan, sheet L-2.1, that
shows an additional landscaping buffer along the perimeter of both properties. Per the plan, the
applicant is proposing to plant a six (6) foot high Podocarpus hedge along the perimeter of both
properties. The applicant is also proposing to plant a row of twelve (12) foot high Bamboo along
the eastern perimeter of Lot 2 as well. However, the details on the other proposed plant material
or specifications were not provided. Because of that, Staff cannot adequately determine if the
proposed landscaping will provide the required buffersneeded to shield the new residences from
the view of the surrounding neighborhood. That said, it will be recommended that the condition
pertaining to additional landscape buffers be maintained to ensure that any adverse impacts to
the adjacent residential properties are mitigated. After review of the project against the City’s
dimensional requirements for the RS-3 zoning district and the City’s subdivision regulations, it
was determined that those requirements will be satisfied.
PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Board item PB-20-017 was reviewed by the Planning Board at its September 14, 2020
meeting. During the public hearing portion of the meeting, the public voiced their concerns
regarding the height and size of the proposed structures. The public also inquired as to what the
landscape buffer between the subject and neighboring properties would consist of. Last, the
Board voiced their concerns regarding the physical barriers put in place to protect the proposed
swimming pools. Afterwards, the Board motioned to recommend approval for the item with
staff’s recommendations. That said, the motion to approve PB-20-017 resulted in a deadlocked
vote. Pursuant to Section 20-6.1(B)(4(a)(iii) of the LDC,
Recommendations on all items before the Board shall be transmitted to the
City Commission within forty-five (45) calendar days of the time that the
8
5907 SW 80 Street – Waiver of Plat Request
November 17, 2020
Page 8 of 9
JKT/mwl
C:\Users\EASYPD~1\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@F00F75C0\@BCL@F00F75C0.docx
item first appears on a regularly scheduled Board agenda. If the Board has
not reached a decision on the item during said forty-five (45) day period, or
if the Board has reviewed the application and is deadlocked, then the item
shall be transmitted forthwith to the City Commission with a "No
Comment" recommendation.
Pursuant to the aforementioned LDC regulation, the item was forwarded to the City Commission
with a “No Comment” recommendation from the Board. For more information, please refer to
the attached September 14, 2020 Planning Board meeting minutes.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Commission approve the Waiver of Plat application. This approval
should be subject to the following terms and conditions as well as all applicable City ordinances,
codes, rules and regulations:
1. The building sites created by the proposed Waiver of Plat will be free of encroachments
from abutting buildable sites;
2. No construction may exceed by more than four (4) percent the size of the building, or floor
area, gross, as shown on the attached conceptual plan, unless the setbacks and yard
requirements are in accord with the Code existing at the time of such construction and
provided the site plan is reviewed by the Planning Board and approved by the City
Commission by a four-fifths vote;
3. The construction of the two (2) new single-family residences shall be subject to the
applicable review and approval of the City’s Environmental Review & Preservation Board;
4. Additional landscape buffers shall be required to mitigate any adverse impact of the
adjacent residential properties;
5. A tree removal permit must be issued for the removal or relocation of any tree on the
property prior to the issuance of a demolition permit;
6. The owner and owner’s architect shall take the necessary steps to protect the trees on the
property that are protected under the City’s Tree Protection Ordinance and the owner shall
retain any existing specimen trees for six years and permanently maintain 50 percent of the
existing protected tree canopy as reflected on the attached tree survey;
7. Submittal of an owner’s affidavit that there are no documents that provide restrictions,
reservations and/or covenants applicable to the parcel of land being considered other than
those that were submitted with the owner’s application for a waiver of plat, tentative or
9
5907 SW 80 Street – Waiver of Plat Request
November 17, 2020
Page 9 of 9
JKT/mwl
C:\Users\EASYPD~1\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@F00F75C0\@BCL@F00F75C0.docx
final plat and that the parcel is free of any declarations of restrictive covenants, unity of
title, easements, or the like, which would prevent the separation of the site; and
8. The property owner shall execute and record in the public records of Miami-Dade County,
a restrictive covenant, in a form approved by and subject to the review and approval of the
City Manager and City Attorney, which contains all commitments made and conditions
imposed as part of the approval of the approved waiver of plat.
Attachments:
Application, received on August 7, 2020
Letter of Intent/Surrounding Properties within 500 Ft Analysis (Applicant Table), dated August 7, 2020
Email from Aurelio J. Carmenates, P.E., dated September 8, 2020
Opinion of Title, prepared by Alfredo D. Xiques, Esq., dated August 7, 2020
Warranty Deed
Surrounding Properties within 500 Ft., prepared by RDR Miami, dated August 6, 2020
Mailing Label Affidavit w/ Location Map, prepared by RDR Miami, dated August 6, 2020
Neighborhood Awareness Affidavit (Affidavit of Javier F. Avino), dated September 4, 2020
Neighborhood Awareness Letter, dated August 25, 2020
City Notice of September 14, 2020 Planning Board Public Hearing
Legal Ad
Updated Tree Disposition Legend
PB-20-017 Waiver of Plat Analysis – 5907 SW 80 Street (Staff Table)
Sketch of Boundary and Topographical Survey – Waiver of Plat
Site Plan – Existing Lot Size, sheet SP-EX01
Site Plan, sheet 5907 SP
Site Plan – Areas Breakdown, sheet 5907 SB
Floor Plan, sheet 5907 FF
Tree Disposition Plan, sheet L-1.0
Tree Disposition Legend, sheet L-1.1
Preliminary Landscape Plan, sheet L-2.1
House 1 - Building Elevations, sheet ELEV-H1
House 2 - Building Elevations, sheet ELEV-H2
Street Elevations, sheet ELEV-H3
10
Resolution No._____________________1
2
A Resolution relating to a Waiver of Plat request to allow a subdivision of 3
property located at 5907 SW 80 Street and as legally described herein4
5
WHEREAS, the 5907 SW 80th Street, LLC, owner of the parcel located at 5907 SW 80 6
Street, submitted Application No. PB-20-017requesting approval to subdivide the property via the 7
Waiver of Plat process; and8
9
WHEREAS,the Waiver of Plat application requests a subdivision of said parcel into two 10
(2) lots in the Low-Density Single Family Residential (RS-3) zoning district; and 11
12
WHEREAS, the two (2) buildable single family lots will each be developed with a new 13
single-family residence; and14
15
WHEREAS, the lots created by the proposed plat are not in strict compliance in that the 16
lot size and frontage for one (1) of the two (2) proposed buildable sites is smaller than the median 17
lot size and frontage of the surrounding area; however, they are both in compliance with the 18
dimensional requirements for the minimum lot size and frontage for the RS-3 zoning district; and19
20
WHEREAS,pursuant to Section 20-4.2(B)(2)(a)(ii) of the Land Development Code, 21
22
The City Commission may, in its discretion, approve a subdivision of land 23
into lots that are included as part of a waiver of plat, tentative or final plat 24
and that have lot frontage or lot area that is less than the Surrounding area 25
median, provided it is approved by four votes of the City Commission and 26
provided that at least the minimum requirements of the Land Development 27
Code are satisfied.28
29
WHEREAS, the owner has submitted the attached conceptual site plan, conceptual tree 30
disposition plan, and conceptual landscape plan for the project which has been reviewed by the 31
Planning Board; and32
33
WHEREAS,at the September 14, 2020 public hearing of the Planning Board, the Board34
vote three (3) ayes to three (3) nays onthe Waiver of Plat application, resulting in a “No Comment” 35
recommendation; and36
37
WHEREAS, the City Commission desires to approve the Waiver of Plat.38
39
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY 40
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA:41
42
Section 1:The recitals set forth in this resolution are true and they are supported by 43
competent substantial evidence and they are incorporated into this resolution by reference as if set 44
forth in full herein.45
46
11
Section 2:The subject application, No. PB-20-017, submitted by applicant 5907 SW 80
th1
Street, LLC requesting approval of a proposed Waiver of Plat for the property legally described in 2
Section 3 below, pursuant to the Land Subdivision Regulations outlined in Land Development 3
Code Section 20-4.2 and the attached conceptual site plan are hereby approved. This approval is 4
subject to the following terms and conditions as well as all applicable City ordinances, codes, rules 5
and regulations:6
7
1. The building sites created by the proposed Waiver of Plat will be free of 8
encroachments from abutting buildable sites;9
10
2. No construction may exceed by more than four (4) percent the size of the building, 11
or floor area, gross, as shown on the attached conceptual plan, unless the setbacks 12
and yard requirements are in accord with the Code existing at the time of such 13
construction and provided the site plan is reviewed by the Planning Board and 14
approved by the City Commission by a four-fifths vote;15
16
3. The construction of the two (2) new single-family residences shall be subject to the 17
applicable review and approval of the City’s Environmental Review & Preservation 18
Board;19
20
4. Additional landscape buffers shall be required to mitigate any adverse impact of the 21
adjacent residential properties;22
23
5. A tree removal permit must be issued for the removal or relocation of any tree on the 24
property prior to the issuance of a demolition permit;25
26
6. The owner and owner’s architect shall take the necessary steps to protect the trees on 27
the property that are protected under the City’s Tree Protection Ordinance and the 28
owner shall retain any existing specimen trees for six years and permanently maintain 29
50 percent of the existing protected tree canopy as reflected on the attached tree 30
survey;31
32
7. Submittal of an owner’s affidavit that there are no documents that provide 33
restrictions, reservations and/or covenants applicable to the parcel of land being 34
considered other than those that were submitted with the owner’s application for a 35
waiver of plat, tentative or final plat and that the parcel is free of any declarations of 36
restrictive covenants, unity of title, easements, or the like, which would prevent the 37
separation of the site; and38
39
8. The property owner shall execute and record in the public records of Miami-Dade 40
County, a restrictive covenant, in a form approved by and subject to the review and 41
approval of the City Manager and City Attorney, which contains all commitments 42
made and conditions imposed as part of the approval of the approved waiver of plat.43
44
9. Submit an opinion of title issued by a member of the Florida Bar which concludes 45
that, as of a date not more than one hundred twenty (120) days before the City 46
12
Commission's decision on the application, and from the root of title as defined by the 1
Marketable Record Title to Real Properties Act, nothing in the chain of title prevents 2
or serves as an exception to the division or change in the parcel's configuration as 3
requested.4
5
6
Section 3. Legal Description7
8
PARENT TRACT9
TRACT 7, OF REVISED PLAT OF A PORTION OF THE AMENDED PLAT OF PALM 10
MIAMI HEIGHTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN 11
PLAT BOOK 43, AT PAGE 37, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, 12
FLORIDA.13
14
LOT 115
THE SOUTH 80 FEET OF THE NORTH 180 FEET OF THE EAST 152 FEET OF 16
TRACT 7, OF REVISED PLAT OF A PORTION OF THE AMENDED PLAT OF PALM 17
MIAMI HEIGHTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN 18
PLAT BOOK 43, AT PAGE 37, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, 19
FLORIDA. CONTAINING 12,160.5 S.F., MORE OR LESS.20
21
LOT 222
THE EAST 152 FEET, LESS THE NORTH 180 FEET, OF TRACT 7, OF REVISED 23
PLAT OF A PORTION OF THE AMENDED PLAT OF PALM MIAMI HEIGHTS, 24
ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF,AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 43, AT 25
PAGE 37, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA.26
CONTAINING 14,727 S.F., MORE OR LESS.27
28
Section 4.The approval of the requested Waiver of Plat includes, as an Exhibit to the 29
Application, the architectural plans signed and sealed by Harold Mon, Registered Architect, with 30
an original issue Date of June 10, 2020and a plot date that ranges from October 16, 2020 –October 31
27, 2020 for the proposed redevelopment of the site located at 5907 SW 80 Street which is 32
incorporated herein by reference. The approval of the Waiver of Plat is subject to and conditioned 33
upon the project being built in substantial compliance with the plans submitted with this 34
application as determined by the Planning and Zoning Director in the Director’s sole discretion.35
36
Section 5.Corrections. Conforming language or technical scrivener-type corrections 37
may be made by the City Attorney for any conforming amendments to be incorporated into the 38
final resolution for signature.39
40
13
Section 6. Severability.If any section clause, sentence, or phrase of this resolution is for 1
any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, the holding shall 2
not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this resolution.3
4
Section 7. Effective Date.This resolution shall become effective immediately upon 5
adoption by vote of the City Commission.6
7
PASSED AND ADOPTED this _______ day of, __________________, 2020.8
9
10
11
12
13
ATTEST:APPROVED:14
15
____________________________________________________16
CITY CLERK MAYOR17
18
READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM, COMMISSION VOTE:
119
LANGUAGE, LEGALITY AND Mayor Philips:20
EXECUTION THEREOF Vice Mayor Welsh:21
Commissioner Gil:22
_______________________Commissioner Harris:23
CITY ATTORNEY Commissioner Liebman:24
1 A four fifths vote is required because the frontages and lot sizes of the new building sites are less than
the surrounding area.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ON THIS SURVEY DOES NOT LIE WITHIN A SPECIAL HAZARD AREA AS DEFINED BY THE FEDERAL EMERGENCYMANAGEMENT AGENCY; THE PROPERTY LIES WITHIN A FLOOD ZONE"X" OF THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP IDENTIFIED ASCOMMUNITY PANEL No. 120035-0269L, WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF SEPTEMBER 11, 2009. BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF N/A FEET(NGVD)LAND AREA OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 27,056 SF (+/-) RECORDED 26,887 SF (+/-) CALCULATEDELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON THE NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM (NGVD) OF 1929, AS PER MIAMI-DADE COUNTY BENCH MARKNo. SC-50, WITH AN ELEVATION OF 9.30 FEET, AND TBM-1: INTERSECTION OF SW 80TH STREET AND SW 59TH AVE., ELEV. 10.48 FEETBEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON AN ASSUME MERIDIAN OF N.02°11'10"W., BEING THE RECORDED BEARING FOR THECENTERLINE OF S.W. 59th AVE., AS SHOWN ON PLAT BOOK 43 AT PAGE 37 OF THE PUBLIC RECORD OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA.THE PROPERTY IS ZONED MIAMI-DADE COUNTY RU-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE)MIAMI-DADE COUNTY FLOOD CRITERIA = 6.3 FEET, AS PER MIAMI-DADE PB. 42 - PG. 37NUMBER OF LOTS: TWOProposed use: TWO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCESOWNER:JD ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CORP.1234JOB SPECIFIC SURVEYOR NOTES:SITE ADDRESS: 5907 S.W. 80th ST, SOUTH MIAMI, FL. 33143JOB NUMBER: 20-129DATE OF SURVEY: JANUARY 20, 2020FOLIO NUMBER: 09-4036-039-0090Consulting Engineers . Planners . SurveyorsTHE SHOWN LEGAL DESCRIPTION USED TO PERFORM THIS BOUNDARY SURVEY WAS PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT.SURVEY IS BASED ON RECORDED INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CLIENT. NO SPECIFIC SEARCH OF THE PUBLIC RECORD HAS BEEN MADE BY OUR OFFICE.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, AN EXAMINATION OF THE ABSTRACT OF TITLE WAS NOT DONE BY THE SIGNING SURVEYOR TO DETERMINE WHICHINSTRUMENTS, IF ANY ARE AFFECTING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.THIS SURVEY IS EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE USE OF THE PARTIES TO WHOM IT WAS CERTIFIED.PURSUANT TO THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE THE EXPECTED USE OF LAND IS SUBURBAN, THE MINIMUM RELATIVE DISTANCE ACCURACY FOR THISTYPE OF SURVEY IS 1 FOOT IN 7,500 FEET. THE ACCURACY OBTAINED BY MEASUREMENT AND CALCULATIONS OF CLOSED GEOMETRIC FIGURES WAS FOUNDTO EXCEED THIS REQUIREMENT.THERE ARE NO VISIBLE, ABOVE GROUND ENCROACHMENTS (a) BY THE IMPROVEMENTS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY UPON ADJOINING PROPERTIES,STREETS OR ALLEYS, OR (b) BY THE IMPROVEMENTS OF THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES, STREETS OR ALLEYS UPON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY OTHER THANTHOSE SHOWN ON THIS BOUNDARY SURVEY.THERE ARE NO VISIBLE EASEMENTS OR RIGHT-OF-WAY OF WHICH THE UNDERSIGNED HAS BEEN ADVISED OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY.THE MAP OF SURVEY IS INTENDED TO BE DISPLAYED AT THE SHOWN GRAPHIC SCALE IN ENGLISH UNITS OF MEASUREMENT. IN SOME CASES GRAPHICREPRESENTATION HAVE BEEN EXAGERATED TO MORE CLEARLY ILLUSTRATE A PARTICULAR AREA WHERE DIMENSIONS SHALL HAVE PREFERENCE OVERGRAPHIC LOCATION.THE ELEVATIONS (IF ANY) OF WELL-IDENTIFIED FEATURES AS DEPICTED ON THIS SURVEY AND MAP WERE MEASURED TO AN ESTIMATED VERTICALPOSITIONAL ACCURACY OF 110 FOOT FOR NATURAL GROUND SURFACES AND 1100 FOOT FOR HARDSCAPE SURFACES, INCLUDING PAVEMENT, CURBS,SIDEWALKS AND OTHER MANMADE STRUCTURES.THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO REPRESENTATION AS TO OWNERSHIP, POSSESSION OR OCCUPATION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY BY ANY ENTITY ORINDIVIDUAL.ANY FEMA FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS SURVEY IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSE ONLY AND IT WAS OBTAINED AT WWW.FEMA.COM.IF YOU ARE READING THIS BOUNDARY SURVEY IN AN ELECTRONIC FORMAT, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS ONLY VALID IF THISDOCUMENT IS ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AS SPECIFIED IN CHAPTER 5J-17.062 (3) OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. IF THIS DOCUMENT IS IN PAPERFORMAT, IT IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR AND MAPPER OF RECORD.NOTHING HEREON SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO GIVE ANY RIGHTS OR BENEFITS TO ANYONE OTHER THAN THOSE CERTIFIED.GENERAL SURVEYOR'S NOTES:NOT VALID UNLESS SEALED WITH AN EMBESSED SURVEYOR SEALTRACT 7, OF REVISED PLAT OF A PORTION OF THE AMENDED PLAT OF PALM MIAMI HEIGHTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLATTHEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 43, AT PAGE 37, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA.WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY AND THE SURVEY MAP RESULTING THEREFROM WAS PERFORMED UNDER MYSUPERVISION AND/OR DIRECTION AND IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF AND FURTHER, THAT SAID "BOUNDARY ANDTOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY" MEETS THE INTENT OF THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE "STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYING IN THE STATE OFFLORIDA", PURSUANT TO RULE 5J-17 OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE AND ITS IMPLEMENTING LAW, CHAPTER 472.027 FOR THE FLORIDA STATUTES. 3195 PONCE DE LEON BLVD, SUITE 200
CORAL GABLES, FL 33134
PHONE: (305)598-5101 FAX: (305)598-8627
ASOMIAMI.COM LOCATION SURVEY SUBJECT SITE A PORTION OF TRACT 7 OF "PALM MIAMI HEIGHTS", ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF ASRECORDED IN P.B. 43, PG.37 IN SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 54 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST,CITY OFSOUTH MIAMI, MIAMI - DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA.56789 1 STY C.B.S. RESIDENCE No. 5907HIGHEST F.F.Elev. 11.15LOWEST F.F. Elev. 10.57(TO BE DEMOLISHED) C.B.S. STRUCTURE(TO BE DEMOLISHED)S.W. 59th AVE.S.W. 80th ST.S.W. 62nd AVE.LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS:PARENT TRACT PARCEL 1AREA: 12,160.5 S.F. PARCEL 2AREA: 14,727 S.F.THE SOUTH 80 FEET OF THE NORTH 180 FEET OF THE EAST 152 FEET OF TRACT 7, OF REVISED PLAT OF A PORTION OFTHE AMENDED PLAT OF PALM MIAMI HEIGHTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 43,AT PAGE 37, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 12,160.5 S.F., MORE OR LESS.PARCEL 1THE EAST 152 FEET, LESS THE NORTH 180 FEET, OF TRACT 7, OF REVISED PLAT OF A PORTION OF THE AMENDED PLATOF PALM MIAMI HEIGHTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 43, AT PAGE 37, OF THEPUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 14,727 S.F., MORE OR LESS.PARCEL 236
1
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
PLANNING BOARD
Regular Meeting Minutes
Monday, September 14, 2020
CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS
07:00 P.M.
The City of South Miami Code of Ordinances, Section 8A -5, requires that all lobbyists, as defined in that section,
must register with the City Clerk before engaging in any lobbying activities and in most cases pay an annual fee of
$500.00 and an additional $100 for each additional issue. This applies to all persons who are retained with or
without compensation to influence any action, decision, recommendation of someone with the city, including the
city manager, city attorney, department heads, city personnel, or members of the city commission or members of
any city board, concerning a matter that could foresee ably be address by the city commission or a city
board. There are some exceptions and exemptions. The following are not considered to be lobbyist: a
representative of a principal at a quasi-judicial hearing, experts who present scientific or technical in formation at
public meetings, representatives of a neighborhood association without compensation and representatives of a
not-for-profit community based organization for the purpose of requesting a grant who seek to influence without
special compensation.
Individuals who wish to view or listen to the meeting in its entirety, audio and video versions of the
meeting can be found on the city’s website (www.southmiamifl.gov).
I. Call to Order
Action: Ms. Ruiz called the meeting to order at 7:06 P.M.
II. Roll Call
Board Members Present Constituting a Quorum: Ms. Mary Ann Ruiz (Chairperson), Mr. Jay Miller
(Vice-Chairperson), Mr. Lee Jacobs, Mr. Brian Corey, Mr. Bruce Baldwin and Ms. Lisa Bonich.
Board Members Absent: Mr. Orlando Borges
City Staff Present: Ms. Jane Tompkins (Planning Director), and Mr. Marcus Lightfoot (Senior
Planner/Zoning Administrator).
City Staff Absent: None.
City Attorney: Mr. Thomas Pepe.
III. Administrative Matters
While there were no administrative matters, Mr. Pepe provided the Board with information
needed to properly conduct the virtual meeting.
IV. Public Hearings:
37
2
Ms. Ruiz provided the Board and public with the rules for the public hearing portion of the
meeting.
1. PB-20-017
Applicant: 5907 SW 80th Street, LLC
A Resolution relating to a Waiver of Plat request to allow a subdivision of property located at
5907 SW 80 Street and as legally described herein.
Applicant: 5907 SW 80th Street, LLC, represented by Mr. Javier F. Aviñó (Practice Group Leader,
Land Development & Government Relations – Bilzin Sumberg) and Ms. Zaba St. George Castro,
Esq. (Attorney)
Ms. Ruiz read PB‐20-017 into the record.
Ms. Ruiz asked Ms. Tompkins who will be presenting the item to the Board, to which Ms. Tompkins
stated that Mr. Lightfoot would be presenting the item.
Ms. Ruiz swore in Mr. Lightfoot. Mr. Lightfoot then presented the item request to the Board.
Ms. Ruiz swore in both Mr. Aviñó and Ms. St. George Castro. Mr. Aviñó then presented the item
to the Board.
The Chairperson opened the floor to public comments on PB-20-017. The Chairperson then
swore in all of the individuals who spoke during the public comment portion of the hearing.
• Mark Aprigliano: Mr. Aprigliano voiced his concerns with the proposed project. Due to its
size, he’s concerned that the property will overpower and shadow his.
He’s also concerned about the northern side setback for Lot 2.
• Christian Keedy: Mr. Keedy voiced his concerns regarding the landscaping proposed for the
project. He also inquired as to what the landscape buffer required in
condition #7 of the staff report would consist of.
• Arturo Davis: Mr. Davis voiced his concerns and objections with the proposed project.
Mr. Davis also provided his objections in writing to the City Clerk’s office
via email correspondence on Tuesday, September 8, 2020. Via his
correspondence, Mr. Davis objected to the development of the
property. The site plan that he received from the owner's counsel was
invalid because it was not in accordance with a comprehensive or well
considered plan as the lots proposed are too long and skinny to fit into the
character of the neighborhood. Further, the lot lines were radical and did
not enhance the neighborhood nor the preservation of the natural
environment. The general welfare of the neighborhood was not
considered and overcrowding of land is being proposed by the applicant.
Mr. Davis stated that he submitted photographs to the City for inclusion
with the record, to which Mr. Lightfoot confirmed. Ms. Ruiz then stated
that the Board will review the evidence at a later time during the hearing.
38
3
The Chairperson opened the floor to public comments on PB-20-017.
Ms. Ruiz opened the floor to rebuttal by the applicant.
Mr. Aviñó stated that his client would like to sit down with the neighbors individually to discuss
possible solutions to the landscaping that would address their concerns. Regarding the side
setback on lot 2, Mr. Aviñó stated that the garage was the only portion of the building that was
set at ten (10) feet from the property line.
Regarding the configuration of the number of lots per block, Mr. Aviñó stated that if approved,
there will be a similar amount of lots on the subject block when compared to the adjacent and
nearby existing blocks. Last, Mr. Aviñó stated that the subject lot is currently out of scale with the
neighborhood. Currently, a home can be built on the lot that would be significantly out of scale
with the neighboring properties.
Ms. St. George Castro stated that the development of a 10,000 square foot home on the property
would only require a building permit and could be built and wouldn’t require input from the
community. What is being proposed is significantly smaller in size and scale and has allowed the
neighborhood to provide input on the project.
Ms. Ruiz opened the floor to questions for either the applicant or staff by the Board.
Mr. Miller stated for the record that he lives in the immediate vicinity of the individuals that spoke
during the public comment portion of the meeting. Mr. Miller then asked if the fifteen (15) foot
setback apply to the garage on lot 2. Mr. Miller asked if the approval would be subject to a six (6)
foot physical barrier so that the swimming pool would be protected. Mr. Lightfoot explained that
two (2) story single family residences on lots of the size proposed are required to have a minimum
first floor setback of ten (10) feet and a minimum second floor setback of fifteen (15) feet. Because
the garage is at the ground floor of the residence, it can have a setback of ten (10) feet. The issue
with the plans was that they did not clearly indicate if there was a second-floor space above the
garage area.
Mr. Miller asked if the proposed conceptual plans were the plans that would be used for
construction of the homes. Mr. Lightfoot responded that while the plans were conceptual, they
essentially were the plans that would be used for construction if approved.
In response to Mr. Miller’s comments regarding swimming pools, Mr. Lightfoot stated that the
LDC has regulations that vary from the Florida Building Code when it involves physical barriers for
swimming pools. He then read the City’s Land Development Code (LDC) regulations for swimming
pools found in Section 20-3.6(J)(2) into the record. Mr. Miller stated that he would a condition
placed on the recommendation that the physical barrier for the properties be six (6) feet high.
Mr. Miller asked if both lots would have to permanently maintain 50% of the existing tree canopy,
to which Mr. Lightfoot stated yes. Mr. Lightfoot then explained that the plans provided showed
that the site as a whole would maintain 50% of the existing canopy but did not show that each
individual lot would comply with the condition.
39
4
Mr. Jacobs stated that the lack of detail on the second floor is concerning to him. He then asked
if there was a setback for both the first and second floor, to which Mr. Lightfoot stated yes. Mr.
Lightfoot then provided the Board with the two-story setback requirements and explained which
setbacks each of the lots was required to comply with. Mr. Jacobs stated that he’s concerned that
homes of this size could throw shade on the adjacent properties. Because of that, he stated that
there should be more detail regarding the second-floor portion of the proposed homes. In
response to Mr. Jacobs questions, Mr. Aviñó stated that the garage on lot 2 is only one-story. He
also provided the setbacks for both of the proposed homes. Mr. Aviñó then asked if that answered
his questions, to which Mr. Jacobs stated yes.
Mr. Corey asked if the street frontage met the minimum requirements of the LDC. Mr. Lightfoot
stated that both properties met the minimum frontage requirements for the RS-3 zoning district
but did not meet the median frontage required by the City’s subdivision regulations. Mr. Lightfoot
added that the project could still be approved but would require a supermajority vote. Mr. Aviñó
provided the Board with the frontages for both lots and stated that they both exceed the
minimum frontage requirement for the district.
With no further questions for either the applicant or staff, Ms. Ruiz opened the floor to Board
discussion on the item.
Mr. Miller stated that he was generally for the project as proposed with the caveat that in the
event the LDC doesn’t require that the physical barrier be six (6) feet high around the pool, that
it be part of the approval. Ms. Ruiz explained the physical barrier options that she had when she
built her pool. Mr. Miller then stated that if approved, a condition that a six (6) foot high opaque
fence be placed along the perimeter of the back yard/pool area be placed on the approval.
Ms. Bonich stated that because each of the lots has different site conditions so the condition for
the fence should be clear. Mr. Miller stated that both lots should be treated the same assuming
that they didn’t use the kid fence to secure the pool. Ms. Ruiz asked if he wanted both properties
to have the physical barrier even if a kid fence was installed, to which Mr. Miller stated yes.
With no further discussion, the Board made a motion on the item.
Motion: Ms. Ruiz moved to approve PB-20-017 with the recommendations on pages 7 and 8 of
the staff report. Ms. Bonich seconded the motion.
Vote: Yes 3, No 3 (Miller, Corey, Jacobs)
Ms. Bonich: Yes
Mr. Miller: No
Mr. Corey: No
Mr. Jacobs: No
Mr. Baldwin: Yes
Ms. Ruiz: Yes
Ms. Ruiz incorrectly stated that the item passed with a vote of 4-3, when the vote was actually 3-
3. Because of that, the motion to approve PB-20-017 resulted in a deadlocked vote. Pursuant to
Section 20-6.1(B)(4(a)(iii) of the LDC,
40
5
Recommendations on all items before the Board shall be transmitted to the
City Commission within forty-five (45) calendar days of the time that the item
first appears on a regularly scheduled Board agenda. If the Board has not
reached a decision on the item during said forty-five (45) day period, or if the
Board has reviewed the application and is deadlocked, then the item shall be
transmitted forthwith to the City Commission with a "No Comment"
recommendation.
Pursuant to the aforementioned LDC regulation, the item will be forwarded to the City
Commission with a “No Comment” recommendation from the Board.
V. Public Comments/New Business
The Chairperson opened the floor for public comments and any new business.
Public Comments Section
There were no Public Comments.
New Business Section
There were no Public Comments.
The Chairperson opened the floor for public comments and any new business.
VI. Approval of the Minutes
1. Planning Board Regular Meeting Minutes of July 14, 2020:
Mr. Miller moved to approve the meeting minutes as presented. The motion was seconded by
Ms. Ruiz.
Vote: Yes 7, No 0 (None)
Mr. Jacobs: Yes
Ms. Bonich: Yes
Mr. Miller: Yes
Mr. Corey: Yes
Mr. Baldwin: Yes
Ms. Ruiz: Yes
The motion to approve the meeting minutes was unanimously approved by the Board.
VII. Future Meeting Date: October 14, 2020
VIII. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 8:17 P.M.
41
42
REQ. / ALLOWEDPROPOSEDUSE SFRLOT AREA (MIN)10,000 SF 14,727 SFFRONTAGE (MIN) 75 FT 127.21 FT (EXISTING)MAX. BLDG COV. 1ST FLR (0.3) 4,418 SF (0.3) 2,521.97 SFMAX. IMPERVIOUS COV. (0.4) 5,891 SF (0.4)5,732.20 SFMAX F.A.R. (0.45) 6,627 SF (0.45) 4,186.52 SFSETBACKS (FIRST FLOOR)FRONT 25 FT 27.50 FTREAR 25 FT 27.50 FTSIDE INTERIOR 10 FT 18.62 FTSIDE STREET 20 FT 48.62 FTSETBACKS (SECOND FLOOR)FRONT 25 FT 41.08 FTREAR 25 FT 27.50 FTSIDE INTERIOR 15 FT 18.62 FTSIDE STREET 25 FT 48.62 FTBUILDING HEIGHTSTORIES 2 2FEET 25 FT 24.58 FT BUILDING AREA:FIRST FLOOR 2,521.97 SFSECOND FLOOR2,145.40 SFTOTAL 4,667.37 SF AREA UNDER ACFIRST FLOOR 2,032.12 SFSECOND FLOOR2,145.40 SFTOTAL 4,177.52 SFLANDSCAPE AREAFRONT YARD (50% 3,660 SF) 1,830 SF(50%)POOL SETBACKSFRONT (MIN. AT FRONT BLDG LINE) 25 FT 75.41' FTWEST SIDE 10 FT 49.87' FTEAST SIDE 10 FT 65.83' FTREAR 10 FT 10 FTLOT 1 - ZONING LEGENDREQ. / ALLOWEDPROPOSEDUSE SFRLOT AREA (MIN)10,000 SF 12,160 SFFRONTAGE (MIN) 75 FT 80 FTMAX. BLDG COV. 1ST FLR (0.3) 3,648 SF (0.3) 2,529.91 SFMAX. IMPERVIOUS COV. (0.4)4,864 SF (0.4)4,841.91 SFMAX F.A.R. (0.45) 5,472 SF (0.45) 3,975.75 SFSETBACKS (FIRST FLOOR)FRONT 25 FT 27.62 FTREAR 25 FT 53.12 FTNORTH SIDE INTERIOR 10 FT 10.16 FTSOUTH SIDE INTERIOR 10 FT 15.08 FTSETBACKS (SECOND FLOOR)FRONT 25 FT 27.62 FTREAR 25 FT 53.12 FTNORTH SIDE INTERIOR 15 FT 32.00 FTSOUTH SIDE INTERIOR 15 FT 15.08 FTBUILDING HEIGHTSTORIES 2 2FEET 25 FT24.83 FTBUILDING AREAFIRST FLOOR 2,538.62 SFSECOND FLOOR1,832.26 SFTOTAL 4,370.88 SFAREA UNDER ACFIRST FLOOR 2,140.32 SFSECOND FLOOR1,832.26 SF TOTAL 3,972.58 SF LANDSCAPE AREAFRONT YARD (50% 2,000 SF) 1,000 SF (50%)POOL SETBACKSFRONT (MIN. AT FRONT BLDG LINE) 25 FT 111.62' FTNORTH SIDE 10 FT 31.58' FTSOUTH SIDE 10 FT 18.41' FTREAR 10 FT 25.20' FTLOT 2 - ZONING LEGENDO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HOO HOO H HOUSE 1HOUSE 2378" BETWEEN T BESTYP. SPACING MA .5(9,6,216 -2% 6+((7 OWNER:5907 SW 80 STREET,LLC.PO BOX 402566MIAMI BEACH, FL 33140JD Engineering Services, Inc.&HUWLILFDWHRIDXWKRUL]DWLRQ 1R JOB TITLE:NEW SINGLE FAMILYRESIDENCE5907 SW 80TH STMIAMI, FL 33143CONSULTING ENGINEERING1231 W 14TH, SUITE 101MIAMI BEACH, FL. 33139(305) 209-3636www.jd-miami.comJOSE LUIS GUZMANPE 561384869 SW 75th AVE.MIAMI, FL. 33155(786) 338-1082 RICARDO N. LOPEZPE 594003461 SE 1ST STREET,HOMESTEAD, FL. 33033(786) 200-8836 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERE + FA ENGINEERSHEET TITLE:HAROLD MONAR998753DA STUDIO, LLC1645 SW 82ND CT. MIAMI, FL. 33155(786) 302-3937 ARCHITECTSCALE: 3 32" 1 0"SITE l n.PROPOSE SITE PLANSCALE: NTSTYPICAL ri c ence edge det il.TYPICAL l min m ic et ence owder co ted ronze SCALE: NTS43
44
45
O HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO H E ISTING PALMTO REMAINE ISTING PALMTO RELOCATEE ISTING TREETO REMAINE ISTING TREETO RELOCATEE ISTING PALMTO REMOVEE ISTING TREETO REMOVE5(9,6,216 -2% 6+((7 OWNER:5907 SW 80 STREET,LLC.PO BOX 402566MIAMI BEACH, FL 33140JD Engineering Services, Inc.&HUWLILFDWHRIDXWKRUL]DWLRQ 1R JOB TITLE:NEW SINGLE FAMILYRESIDENCE5907 SW 80TH STMIAMI, FL 33143CONSULTING ENGINEERING1231 W 14TH, SUITE 101MIAMI BEACH, FL. 33139(305) 209-3636www.jd-miami.comJOSE LUIS GUZMANPE 561384869 SW 75th AVE.MIAMI, FL. 33155(786) 338-1082 RICARDO N. LOPEZPE 594003461 SE 1ST STREET,HOMESTEAD, FL. 33033(786) 200-8836 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERE + FA ENGINEERSHEET TITLE:HAROLD MONAR998753DA STUDIO, LLC1645 SW 82ND CT. MIAMI, FL. 33155(786) 302-3937 ARCHITECTPROFESSIONAL SEAL:VINCENT A. FILIGENZILA #6667191900 BISCAYNE BLVD. #1403MIAMI, FL. 33132(786) 346-8909LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSCALE: NTSTREE PROTECTION DETAILTREE DISPOSITIONPLAN1TREE DISPOSITION PLANSCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"SYMBOL LEGENDSCALE: NTSTOTAL CANOPY REMOVAL CALCULATIONOVERALL EXISTING CANOPY 24,824 SFINVASIVE CANOPY 9,714 SFNON-INVASIVE CANOPY 15,110 SF50% NON-INVASIVE CANOPY 7,555 SFREMOVED CANOPY 3,252 SF
46
5(9,6,216 -2% 6+((7 OWNER:5907 SW 80 STREET,LLC.PO BOX 402566MIAMI BEACH, FL 33140JD Engineering Services, Inc.&HUWLILFDWHRIDXWKRUL]DWLRQ 1R JOB TITLE:NEW SINGLE FAMILYRESIDENCE5907 SW 80TH STMIAMI, FL 33143CONSULTING ENGINEERING1231 W 14TH, SUITE 101MIAMI BEACH, FL. 33139(305) 209-3636www.jd-miami.comJOSE LUIS GUZMANPE 561384869 SW 75th AVE.MIAMI, FL. 33155(786) 338-1082 RICARDO N. LOPEZPE 594003461 SE 1ST STREET,HOMESTEAD, FL. 33033(786) 200-8836 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERE + FA ENGINEERSHEET TITLE:HAROLD MONAR998753DA STUDIO, LLC1645 SW 82ND CT. MIAMI, FL. 33155(786) 302-3937 ARCHITECTPROFESSIONAL SEAL:VINCENT A. FILIGENZILA #6667191900 BISCAYNE BLVD. #1403MIAMI, FL. 33132(786) 346-8909LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTTREE DISPOSITIONLEGENDTREE DISPOSITION LEGENDLOT 2TREE DISPOSITION LEGENDLOT 1LOT 1 CANOPY REMOVAL CALCULATIONOVERALL EXISTING CANOPY 14,002 SFINVASIVE CANOPY 5,181 SFNON-INVASIVE CANOPY 8,821 SF50% NON-INVASIVE CANOPY 4,411 SFREMOVED CANOPY 967 SFLOT 2 CANOPY REMOVAL CALCULATIONOVERALL EXISTING CANOPY 10,822 SFINVASIVE CANOPY 4,533 SFNON-INVASIVE CANOPY 6,289 SF50% NON-INVASIVE CANOPY 3,144 SFREMOVED CANOPY 2,285 SF
47
48
49
50
51
18SE SUNDAY NOVEMBER 8 2020NEIGHBORSMIAMIHERALD.COM
Two national chains,
roaches, flies and mold
make appearances on this
geographically diverse
edition of Gross Grocers.
In a rarity, this look at
inspections of food sellers
and handlers hits for the
South Florida cycle — rep-
resentation from Miami-
Dade, Broward, Palm
Beach and Monroe coun-
ties.
Now the rules: Unlike
Florida Department of
Business and Professional
Regulation inspections of
restaurants, failing doesn’t
mean a store gets closed
until it passes. But parts of
the store can be put under
a Stop Use order until the
problem gets properly
addressed. A place gets
enough Stop Use orders, it
might not have enough
parts of the store it can use
to make opening worth-
while.
What follows comes
from Florida Department
of Agriculture inspection of
groceries, supermarkets,
minimarts, convenience
stores, food storage, food
distribution and food pro-
cessing facilities. If want a
place inspected or want to
report a problem, don’t
email us. Go to the Depart-
ment of Agriculture web-
site and file a complaint.
We don’t decide who
gets inspected or how
strictly they get inspected.
We report without passion
or prejudice, but with a loaf
of humor.
In alphabetical order:
De Leon Seafood, 201
20th St., Marathon:We
know things can be a little
more raw and outdoorsy in
the Keys, but even in Flip-
Flop Land, one must ob-
serve some indoor living
cleanliness rules.
Such as having a way to
wash, rinse and sanitize
cookware. “Warewash sink
was found outside, but not
attached.”
And there needs to be a
handwash sink in the area
where the ready-to-eat
stone crabs are processed.
“Ceiling located above
the cooker for ready-to-eat
stone crabs was found
open, not sealed properly,
to prevent cross contam-
ination or protect food.”
So, who knows what kind
of ceiling sauce dripped on
the stone crabs?
Futuro Supermarket,
13660 SW 56th St., West
Miami-Dade:Maybe it’s
called “Futuro” because
that’s when the owners
plan to get the permit they
didn’t have.
They also didn’t have a
handwash sink in the food
service area “where the hot
box food items are served/
packaged and the pork
rinds/pork shoulders are
served/packaged for cus-
tomers.”
They did have a hand-
washing sink that “shoots
water at the person wash-
ing hands from the base
where the faucet attaches
to the sink basin.” Seems
like that would deter use.
Futuro’s got until Dec. 3
to deal with that. More
immediately, they need to
address the employee
washing, rinsing, but not
sanitizing utensils and
dishes.
Also, the bread pudding,
flan and arroz con leche
bore no indication who
made them or from
whence they came. Basura.
An ice machine had
“black, mold-like grime
encrusted on the interior
housing and icemaking
portion.”
Papa Corn’s House,
15585 SW 177th Ave.,
South Miami-Dade:“No
toilet installed in a fixed
building is available on the
premises. Only a portable
restroom is available at the
location.”
Having mystery food —
no manufacturer informa-
tion on custard, fruit in
syrup and pasta salad —
got all of that tossed.
Papa didn’t stop being a
rolling stone long enough
to get a septic permit from
the Department of Health.
Stop Use orders already
sidelined all open food
handling areas, food equip-
ment and processing areas.
The inspection says Pa-
pa’s folks moved some
equipment outside to the
taco food truck, which
would be covered by the
Florida Department of
Business and Professional
Regulation inspectors, and
promised to work from
there.
GROSS GROCERS
Roaches, mold: South Florida
grocers fail inspection
BY DAVID J. NEAL
dneal@miamiherald.com
DAVID J. NEAL dneal@miamiherald.com
Moldy peppers.
52
53
54