No preview available
 /
     
Res No 046-20-15486Agenda Item No:2. City Commission Agenda Item Report Meeting Date: May 19, 2020 Submitted by: Marcus Lightfoot Submitting Department: Planning & Zoning Department Item Type: Resolution Agenda Section: Subject: A Resolution relating to the review and adoption of the Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy. 3/5 (City Manager-Planning Dept.) Suggested Action: Attachments: Cover Memo Local Mitigation Strategy.docx Resolution approving Co Loss Mitigation Strategy .doc local-mitigation-strategy-part-1-strategy.pdf local-mitigation-strategy-part-2-projects.pdf local-mitigation-strategy-part-3-funding.pdf local-mitigation-strategy-part-4-appendices.pdf local-mitigation-strategy-part-5-meeting-minutes.pdf local-mitigation-strategy-part-6-completed-projects.pdf local-mitigation-strategy-part-7-flooding-nfip-and-crs.pdf 1 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO:Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission VIA:Steven J. Alexander, City Manager FROM:Jane K. Tompkins, Planning and Zoning Director DATE:May 19, 2020 A Resolution relating to the review and adoption of the Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy. BACKGROUND: The City of South Miami has been a regular participant in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) since September 29, 1972. In addition to meeting the basic requirements of the NFIP, the City has completed additional floodplain management activities to participate in the Community Rating System (CRS) program, which rewards local communities with insurance premium discounts for taking actions to reduce flood risk and vulnerability. Currently, the City is a CRS Class 7 which rewards all policyholders in the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) with a fifteen percent (15%) reduction in their flood insurance premiums. Non-SFHA policies (Standard X Zone policies) receive a five percent (5%) discount, and preferred risk policies receive no discount. As a requirement for participating in the CRS, the City must participate in on-going flood prevention activities. This includes but is not limited to the installation of drainage improvements along City owned right-of-way’s, the maintenance of the existing drainage systems and the maintenance of canals. As part of this process, the City participates in the Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) workgroup that is run by the Miami-Dade Office of Emergency Management. The primary purpose of the LMS is to establish an on-going process that will make hazard mitigation part of the County’s annual routine. The LMS is a process whereby the County assesses its vulnerabilities to all types of hazards (i.e. hurricanes, tornados, wildfires, thunderstorms, marine hazards, floods, man-made hazards, lightening, etc.) and identifies a comprehensive list of goals, objectives, plans, programs and/or projects in an effort to decrease or eliminate the effects of those vulnerabilities, and then prioritizes the implementation of those initiatives. Most importantly, the purpose of the LMS plan is to satisfy the minimum Federal Emergency Management Agency local mitigation plan standards of acceptability to remain eligible for Federal and State disaster and non-disaster mitigation funding opportunities. The County’s LMS Plan must be in accordance with the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 and must be updated every five years to remain compliant. The County’s LMS is updated on an annual basis and the annual update is provided to the State by Jan 31st of each year. 2 Miami-Dade County Local Mitigation Strategy Adoption May 19, 2020 Page 2 of 2 JKT/mwl C:\Users\EASYPD~1\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@E005E644\@BCL@E005E644.docx At this time, the City has a total of seven (7) ongoing projects listed in the LMS that include citywide drainage improvements, city-wide storm drain cleanouts and the improvement of the stormwater drainage system. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Commission adopt the Miami-Dade County Local Mitigation Strategy. Attachments: Draft Resolution Local Mitigation Strategy – Part 1: Strategy Local Mitigation Strategy – Part 2: Projects Local Mitigation Strategy – Part 3: Funding Local Mitigation Strategy – Part 4: Appendices Local Mitigation Strategy – Part 5: Meeting Minutes Local Mitigation Strategy – Part 6: Completed Projects Local Mitigation Strategy – Part 7: Flooding – The NFIP and CRS 3 Local Mitigation Strategy Whole Community Hazard Mitigation Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 6 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1 – The Strategy January 2017 P1-ii This page left intentionally blank. 7 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1 – The Strategy January 2018 P1-i INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 3 PURPOSE .......................................................................................................................................... 3 HOW TO USE THIS PLAN ..................................................................................................................... 4 LMS ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE .................................................................... 5 LMS COORDINATOR/CHAIR ............................................................................................................... 5 LMS CO-CHAIR ................................................................................................................................. 5 STEERING COMMITTEE ....................................................................................................................... 5 LMS WORKING GROUP (LMSWG) .................................................................................................... 6 Municipal Participation ........................................................................................................ 6 LMS SUB-COMMITTEES (LMSS-C) .................................................................................................... 7 MEETINGS ......................................................................................................................................... 7 PLANNING PROCESS .................................................................................................... 7 ANNUAL UPDATES ............................................................................................................................. 8 MONTHLY UPDATES (AS NEEDED) ....................................................................................................... 8 PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT ......................................................................................................... 8 FIVE-YEAR UPDATE ........................................................................................................................... 9 PLAN ADOPTION ................................................................................................................................ 9 REVIEW AND REVISION CRITERIA ...................................................................................................... 10 PROGRAM BENCHMARKS ........................................................................................ 11 LMS REVISIONS SINCE LAST ADOPTION ........................................................................................... 12 RECENT DEVELOPMENT/REDEVELOPMENT ....................................................................................... 13 MEASURING THE OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS OF THE LMS PROGRAM ................................................. 15 POLICIES, ORDINANCES AND PROGRAMS AFFECTING MITIGATION ...... 17 FEDERAL ......................................................................................................................................... 17 STATE ............................................................................................................................................. 18 Federal, State and Regional Governmental Entities ........................................................ 19 COUNTY .......................................................................................................................................... 20 County Programs .............................................................................................................. 21 MUNICIPALITIES ............................................................................................................................... 23 Municipal Agencies and Their Mitigation Functions ......................................................... 23 ANALYSIS OF EXISTING POLICIES, ORDINANCES AND PROGRAMS ...................................................... 24 MUNICIPAL INTEGRATION OF MITIGATION MEASURES ........................................................................ 26 Aventura ........................................................................................................................... 26 Bal Harbour....................................................................................................................... 27 Bay Harbor Islands ........................................................................................................... 27 Biscayne Park ................................................................................................................... 30 Coral Gables ..................................................................................................................... 30 Cutler Bay ......................................................................................................................... 31 Doral ................................................................................................................................. 33 El Portal ............................................................................................................................ 34 Florida City ........................................................................................................................ 34 Golden Beach ................................................................................................................... 35 Hialeah .............................................................................................................................. 35 Hialeah Gardens ............................................................................................................... 35 Homestead ....................................................................................................................... 36 Key Biscayne .................................................................................................................... 36 Medley .............................................................................................................................. 38 Miami ................................................................................................................................ 39 Miami Beach ..................................................................................................................... 41 Miami Gardens ................................................................................................................. 42 Miami Lakes...................................................................................................................... 43 Miami Shores .................................................................................................................... 43 8 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1 – The Strategy January 2018 P1-ii Miami Springs ................................................................................................................... 45 North Bay Village .............................................................................................................. 45 North Miami ...................................................................................................................... 46 North Miami Beach ........................................................................................................... 47 Opa-locka ......................................................................................................................... 52 Palmetto Bay .................................................................................................................... 54 Pinecrest ........................................................................................................................... 55 South Miami ...................................................................................................................... 55 Sunny Isles Beach ............................................................................................................ 56 Surfside ............................................................................................................................. 56 Sweetwater ....................................................................................................................... 57 Virginia Gardens ............................................................................................................... 58 West Miami ....................................................................................................................... 58 MITIGATION GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ............................................................... 59 GOALS ............................................................................................................................................ 59 MITIGATION OPPORTUNITIES ............................................................................................................ 61 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION & VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT..................... 64 DROUGHT ........................................................................................................................................ 77 EROSION ......................................................................................................................................... 80 FLOODING ....................................................................................................................................... 84 HURRICANES AND TROPICAL STORMS .............................................................................................. 93 SALTWATER INTRUSION ................................................................................................................. 107 SEA LEVEL RISE ............................................................................................................................ 110 SEVERE STORM ............................................................................................................................. 123 TORNADO ...................................................................................................................................... 125 WILDFIRE ...................................................................................................................................... 128 WINTER STORM ............................................................................................................................. 131 NATURAL HAZARDS BY JURISDICTION ............................................................................................ 134 MIAMI -DADE COUNTY CRITICAL FACILITIES INVENTORY .................................................................. 136 DATA SOURCES IDENTIFIED ............................................................................................................ 136 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)........................................................ 137 Other U. S. Government Databases and Information Sources ...................................... 137 State of Florida ............................................................................................................... 137 Miami-Dade County ........................................................................................................ 137 Municipal Agencies ......................................................................................................... 138 Additional Resources ...................................................................................................... 138 CONFLICT RESOLUTION PROCEDURES ............................................................ 138 9 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-3 INTRODUCTION The Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) is a whole community initiative designed to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk to human life and property from hazards. The LMS plan is a multi-volume plan that documents the planning process and addresses mitigation measures in relation to the hazard risk and vulnerability assessment of Miami-Dade County. This is a living document that is updated to integrate and reflect current and projected issues as identified and track mitigation measures and actions that have oc- curred, are occurring, are planned for or are desired. This plan is a compendium of efforts of the whole community, integrating governmental and non-governmental agencies such as non-profit, private sector, educational and faith-based organizations as well as com- munities, families and individuals. As of 2018 the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) estimates that there is a six dollar savings for every dollar invested into mitigation measures. This version of the plan is an annual update within the five-year review process that was approved in 2015 with inclusion of new initiatives including the integration of climate change, sea level rise and additional measures to address flooding and the Community Rating System. This plan was open for public review and comments received were inte- grated and then the plan was submitted to the Florida Division of Emergency Manage- ment (FDEM) and FEMA for review and approval. After federal approval this plan was adopted by the Miami-Dade Board of County Commissioners (BCC) for adoption in Sep- tember 2015. A review of the changes that have been made to the LMS since its last adoption in 2015 is provided in Part 1 under Section “LMS Revisions Since Last Adoption” and Part 4: Appendix A. Purpose The purpose of the LMS is to develop a comprehensive approach to effectively reduce the impact of current and future hazards and risk faced by local communities within Miami- Dade County. 1 The LMS accomplishes this through the following measures: • A planning process that encourages whole community participation and input • Review and incorporation of community plans, local, state and federal regulations and guidance, studies, reports and technical information • Overview of past and present occurrences and projected future hazard events • Linkage of mitigation measures and actions to the Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) • Identification of measures and actions as LMS Projects that have been accom- plished, are planned for implementation or identified as potential or future initiatives • Identification of potential or actual funding sources • Integration of GIS to provide maps to illustrate hazard and risk areas, consequence analysis and mitigation measures 1 EMAP 2016 Standard 4.2.1 10 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-4 • Semi-annual reviews and updates of all strategy components • Regular meetings, informational bulletins, trainings and workshops to engage the mitigation participants • An identified process for monitoring the overall progress of mitigation strategies and documentation of completed initiatives This strategy will continuously evolve to address current and future risk and vulnerability. How to use this Plan The LMS is divided into seven parts: Part 1 – The Strategy – Provides an overview of the LMS and identifies how the program is implemented, the integration and update of plans, identifies authorities and references that guide the program, and sets forth the goals and objectives for specific measures and actions to address the threats and hazards faced by our communities. Part 2 – The Projects - Contains the list of projects identified by Working Group members for mitigation measures/actions they have completed, are pursuing or one-day hope to implement, and the methodology for how projects are initially prioritized. 2 Part 3 – Funding – Identifies potential funding sources for mitigation projects. Part 4 – Appendices – This section contains a number of supportive documents includ- ing: • List of Updates made to the plan since the last adoption • List of LMS members including Steering Committee, Working Group and Sub- Committees • Miami-Dade Resolution Adopting the LMS • State Letter approving the LMS • FEMA Letter approving the LMS • Local Charter information for Metropolitan form of Government • Integration Document • THIRA – Demographic • Economic Assessment • Maps • Community Survey Part 5 – Meeting Notes – Contains meeting notes and attendance since the beginning of the program Part 6 – Completed Projects – Contains a description of some of the completed projects 2 EMAP 2016 Standard 4.2.3 11 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-5 Part 7 – Flooding: The NFIP (National Flood Insurance Program) and CRS (Commu- nity Rating System) – Contains information specific to flood management plans and identifies activities in support of the CRS program All parts of the LMS are published separately to allow for intermittent updates. All of these sections are published on the LMS website and are open for public com- ment at any time, the plan is at http://www.miamidade.gov/fire/mitigation.asp and com- ments can be sent to mdlms@miamidade.gov. LMS ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE The LMS is a compilation of initiatives that are identified and supported by the LMS Co- ordinator, LMS Co-Chair, the LMS Steering Committee, the LMS Working Group (LMSWG) and LMS Sub-Committees (LMSS-C) and ultimately adopted by local elected officials. A complete listing of the participants of the LMS are listed in Part 4 Appendices B and C. LMS Coordinator/Chair The Planning Bureau Manager of the Miami-Dade Office of Emergency Management (OEM), serves as the LMS Coordinator/Chair. The LMS Coordinator is responsible for the review, monitoring, update and maintenance of the LMS plan, coordination of meet- ings, trainings, review and archiving of LMS Projects and dissemination of information pertinent to the mitigation goals and objectives set forth in the LMS. The LMS Coordinator participates in workshops, trainings and conferences throughout the year to benefit the LMS. The LMS Coordinator maintains a distribution list of persons interested in mitiga- tion and is responsible for the website updates. LMS Co-Chair The LMS Co-Chair is an appointed position by the LMS Steering Committee and assists the Chair with review and development of documents, provides consultation to the Chair and is responsible to stand in for the Chair in case of any unforeseen absences. Steering Committee The Steering Committee acts as a “board-of-directors” and is responsible for the devel- opment of policy guidance. Members of the Steering Committee are representative of the organizations found within the larger Working Group (i.e. municipal, county, educa- tional, not-for-profit, private sectors and individuals). The Steering Committee acts as a review committee for the establishment of this LMS and the prioritization of the projects therein when a limited funding source is available. Membership on any committee shall be voluntary and subject to the review and approval of the LMSWG. A committee mem- ber who fails to attend a reasonable number of committee meetings may be dropped from participation in the committee by a majority vote of the other members of that committee. 12 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-6 Currently, any planning and program development issues are addressed through as- needed Steering Committee meetings and in an open forum through the quarterly meet- ings. LMS Working Group (LMSWG) The LMSWG is composed of representatives from eight main groups: • Municipalities • County Departments • Colleges and Universities • Hospitals and Health Care • Private Non-Profit • Private Sector/Businesses • Regional, State and Federal Partners • Other Stakeholders, including private citizens The makeup of the LMSWG is not limited to any particular organization or jurisdiction. Numerous others have expressed the desire to participate in the LMS and are welcome to do so. Each organization is encouraged to solicit participation and commentary from its citizens, employees and members.3 To be considered a participant of the LMS and receive the benefits thereof, a municipality, county department or any other organization must attend at least two of the four quarterly meetings held each year. The LMSWG endorsed this policy unanimously on September 20, 2001. However, any organization may substitute regular participation and attendance on an active LMS committee or subcommittee in lieu of attendance at the quarterly meet- ings. The agencies that are participating in the LMSWG are identified in Part 4 Appendix B. Municipal Participation Within Miami-Dade County the following municipalities are active participants of the LMS. City of Aventura City of Hialeah Gardens City of North Miami Bal Harbour Village City of Homestead City of North Miami Beach Town of Bay Harbor Islands Village of Key Biscayne City of Opa-locka Village of Biscayne Park Town of Medley Village of Palmetto Bay City of Coral Gables City of Miami Village of Pinecrest Town of Cutler Bay City of Miami Beach City of South Miami City of Doral City of Miami Gardens City of Sunny Isles Beach Village of El Portal Town of Miami Lakes Town of Surfside City of Florida City Miami Shores Village City of Sweetwater Town of Golden Beach City of Miami Springs Village of Virginia Gardens City of Hialeah City of North Bay Village City of West Miami 3 EMAP 2016 Standard 4.4.1(2) 13 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-7 Indian Creek Village opted to leave the LMS and the City of Islandia is no longer consid- ered a municipality. For simplicity sake of the document, municipalities will be referred to by only the name and not the full title e.g. City of Coral Gables will be referred to as Coral Gables. LMS Sub-Committees (LMSS-C) In order to streamline the Working Group’s activities, various sub-committees may be formed, each addressing an area of concern as needed. Initially, committees were formed to deal with flooding, evacuations, funding, community education, external policy, agriculture and wildfires. The formation and disbandment of sub-committees is done in correlation with the trending issues that need addressing and participation from the work- ing group members. The current listing of sub-committees may be found in Part 4 Ap- pendix C. Meetings The Steering Committee and Sub-Committees meet as needed and the full Working Group meets once each calendar quarter. Meeting announcements are posted on the LMS webpage, announced in the LMS Information Bulletins (quarterly) and emails are sent to a distribution group of representatives maintained in the LMS Contact list, main- tained by the LMS Coordinator. The LMS Coordinator sends a meeting invitation for the quarterly meetings via the LMS email distribution list at least one month in advance of the meeting. The representatives are encouraged to post meeting notifications prominently, on com- munity bulletin boards or in some other way, to notify the public or other interested parties at least thirty days prior to each meeting. Meeting times, dates and locations will also be posted on the LMS website: http://www.miamidade.gov/fire/mitigation.asp. A listing of meeting notes and attendance records are kept in Part 5. PLANNING PROCESS 4 In the spring of 1998, the state of Florida contracted with and provided funding to each of the counties within the state to develop an LMS. Community members embraced the LMS as the devastation of Hurricane Andrew, was still fresh in their memories. The first meetings were set and development of the original strategy was begun. The plan has evolved over the years to encompass the changes in our communities and evolution of hazards and risks. The LMS Coordinator with the assistance of the LMS Steering Committee, and input from the LMSWG, LMSS-C and the general public, undertakes to incorporate updates and 4 EMAP 2016 Standard 4.2.1.(2) 14 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-8 monitors the plan to keep it relevant and forward looking. Updates will be based on fac- tors such as recent disaster events, changes in local, state, and federal policies and leg- islation, changes in development and comments and input provided on the plan. The LMS takes into consideration emerging issues such as aging infrastructure and housing stock and how new development and redevelopment projects impact our communities. The elements listed within the “Review and Revision Criteria” section of the document will be used as monitoring criteria for this document. The LMS Coordinator includes a listing of the revisions made to the plan in relation to these factors, as documented in the section entitled “LMS Revisions Since Last Adop- tion”. Annual Updates The LMS is updated on an annual basis and as part of a regular update and monitoring process. Any proposed changes will be reviewed and compared against LMS and CEMP Crosswalks provided by FDEM, the Emergency Management Accreditation Program (EMAP) Standards and the CRS Coordinator’s Manual. An annual update to the LMS is provided to the State by January 31st every year and the documents are subsequently posted on the local website. As of March 2015, the LMSWG voted to have the LMS Projects be updated one time per year. Updates are to be made by October 31st. Agen- cies that have not updated their projects will be notified that they must comply with the update by December 31st or their projects will be made Inactive. See Part 2: The Projects for more information on project updates and maintenance. Monthly Updates (as needed) Part 7 of the LMS may be utilized by CRS communities to post their Annual Activity 510 Progress Reports. CRS communities are responsible for sending this information to the LMS Coordinator for inclusion. An update to Part 7 will be posted on line by the last calendar day of any month during which time a 510 report was received. It is the respon- sibility of the CRS community to provide their reports to the LMS Coordinator at least 10 working days in advance of the end of the month to allow for incorporation and posting on the website. Public Review and Comment At all times, the latest published version of the LMS will be posted on the Miami-Dade County Internet website – http://www.miamidade.gov/fire/mitigation.asp – for public re- view and commentary. Any comments received through this medium will be incorporated through the revision process identified above. An email address, mdlms@miami- dade.gov, has been established for such commentary, which is strongly encouraged. The LMS Quarterly meetings are posted on our website and for the five-year review pro- cess, additional municipalities also advertised the meeting, review process and website. 15 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-9 In October 2014, OEM posted a message on our Facebook page and sent out tweets via Twitter to encourage community members to review and comment on the draft of the plan. Five-Year Update A complete state and federal review and approval of this plan and is conducted on a five- year cycle. The plan has undergone review and approval from FDEM and FEMA in 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2015. The five-year review process incorporates the annual updates and a review of the Local Mitigation Strategy Crosswalk as provided by FDEM. FDEM notifies the LMS Coordinator twelve months in advance of the plan expiration. The plan is updated and prepared for the third quarterly meeting of the fourth year for public review and comments on the plan. Once all comments are reviewed and incorporated as deemed appropriate, the updated plan will be submitted to the FDEM, by the LMS Coor- dinator, for review approximately six months prior to its expiration. FDEM will review the plan and provide comments, and if needed the LMS Coordinator will make revisions to satisfy any crosswalk deficiencies. Once the plan has been ap- proved by the state it is then sent to FEMA for review and a similar process occurs until it is approved by FEMA. Plan Adoption Once the plan has been approved by FEMA, the plan will be submitted to the Miami-Dade Board of County Commissioners (BCC) for adoption. Miami-Dade County has a metro- politan form of government with its own Home Rule Charter (see Part 4 – Appendix G for additional information). When the BCC passes a resolution or ordinance, that action au- tomatically includes all the municipalities within the county. In the event a municipality does not wish to participate in the action, that municipality must, through their own reso- lution, opt out. For example, when the BCC adopted this LMS, the municipalities were automatically included and none opted out. 16 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-10 Local communities that wish to utilize the LMS as their floodplain management plan for credit under the CRS program must also do a local adoption of the LMS. Copies of the local adoption should be sent to the LMS Coordinator to be incorporated into Part 4. Review and Revision Criteria This document will be updated by the LMS Coordinator with the assistance of the Steering Committee and input from the LMSWG. The majority of revisions made to each section of this document are based upon LMSWG meetings where comments are sought from participants. The public is also given an opportunity to review this document and provide comments through the Miami-Dade County website. Revisions may also be made based upon experience from any significant events such as a hurricane, destructive tornado, severe hazardous materials spill or any other occurrence where mitigation could benefit the community. Changes in federal, state, and local laws will also be reflected in the updated version of this document. The revisions will then be documented and posted on line and/or sent out via LMS Information Bulletins by the LMS Coordinator to all affected parties. The evaluation criteria includes: 1. Have there been any new mandates from federal, state or local agencies that require changes to the Local Mitigation Strategy? Any new or changing laws, policies or reg- ulations? 2. Are there any societal developments or significant changes in the community that must be added to the current LMS? Does the LMS still reflect the concerns of the community? Are the demographics the same? Has there been any growth or devel- opment in hazard areas? 3. Have there been any changes in funding sources or requirements? 4. Are there any recent technological developments that should be reviewed for inclusion in the LMS document? 5. Should the LMS be updated to include any new forms of hazards or areas of vulnera- bility within our community? 6. Have there been any changes in the Comprehensive Plan or any other form of stand- ard operating procedure? 7. Have any of the mitigation opportunities been implemented? Are the priorities for implementation the same? 8. What are the recommendations or lessons learned from any major incidents that have occurred during the past year? During the revision process, each criterion is addressed to determine if they are still valid and adjustments are made as necessary. When satisfied that the criteria are appropriate, each of the outstanding mitigation opportunities is then compared against the criteria. All existing mitigation opportunities that are determined to still be viable projects will remain on the project list. All those that are determined to be no longer workable will be set aside for further review and revision or, dropped as no longer feasible. 17 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-11 PROGRAM BENCHMARKS This section provides an overview of the highlights of the plan as well as recent updates to the plan in relation to risk analysis and changes in development. A complete listing of all of the meeting minutes since the beginning of the LMS program may be found in Part 5. 1998 – Miami-Dade County began developing a LMS program through funding from the State of Florida. September 1999 – The Miami-Dade County LMSWG voted to continue the LMS program with or without state funding. March 2000 – The LMSWG determined that the LMS master document should be up- dated two to three times each year and the updates, including the project list for new, updated, completed and deferred projects would be updated twice a year. June 6, 2000 – The Miami-Dade BCC passed Resolution R-572-00 formally adopting the Local Mitigation Strategy as official county policy thus further promoting program continu- ity. September 13, 2000 – Miami-Dade County, along with its municipalities and other or- ganizations was designated by FEMA and the Florida Department of Community Affairs to be a “Project Impact Community.” December 6, 2000 – The LMSWG agreed that they would become the Project Impact Working Group and that the LMS would continue under the auspices of Project Impact. Henceforth, Project Impact and the LMS became synonymous. December 2000 – The LMSWG determined that the LMS Project List would be updated by June 30th and December 31st of each year. May 30, 2001 – A formal “signing ceremony” took place at Vizcaya Museum and Gardens for members of the LMSWG to sign a proclamation for becoming a “Project Impact Part- ner.” (Although FEMA no longer endorses Project Impact the LMSWG agreed that the Project Impact concept will continue in Miami-Dade County regardless of what it is called.) June 7, 2005 – The Miami-Dade BCC passed Resolution R-710-05, which states that grant applications filed under the auspices of the Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy no longer have to go to the Commission for approval, but instead authorizes the county manager to “Apply for, receive, expend and amend applications for grant funds for pro- jects listed in the Miami-Dade County Local Mitigation Strategy.” June 2008 – The LMSWG celebrated its 10th anniversary with over 300 completed miti- gation projects at a value exceeding 250 million dollars. A listing of completed mitigation projects that have been tracked may be found in Part 6. 18 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-12 November 2009 – The County Mayor delegated signature authority to the Director of Emergency Management for contract and grant-related documents under the purview of the LMS Program. This was renewed in 2012. April 10, 2010 – Adoption of the five-year update of the LMS by the BCC May 5, 2010 – FEMA approved the five-year update of the LMS September 1, 2015 – Adoption of the five-year update of the LMS by the BCC September 15, 2015 – FEMA approved the five-year update of the LMS. LMS Revisions Since Last Adoption This section provides an overview of the achievements of the LMSWG to continue to promote and incorporate mitigation measures across the whole community concept and address changes to our risk profile and development and re-development. March 2017 • March 7 Adaptation Measures C-7 basin meeting • March 15 Quarterly LMS Meeting open to the public • March 28 FEMA Coastal Flood Study Update April 2017 • April 3 Mosquito Abatement Training • Miami-Dade Cyber Security Plan created May 2017 • May 3 Statewide Hurricane Exercise with flood component for CRS communities • May 5 Discussion with RER regarding the update of the Miami-Dade Comprehen- sive Development Master Plan June 2017 • June 13 State Hazard Mitigation Assistance Team meeting • June 20 CRS Manual Changes meeting • June 21 Quarterly Meeting open to the public • June 27 FEMA Mitigation Webinar – Yellowjackets July 2017 • Mapped LMS Projects August 2017 • August 1 meetings with County Departments and RER Office of Resilience re- garding vulnerabilities to flooding, storm surge and sea level rise • August 31 Adaptation Action Area for C-7 Basin 19 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-13 September 2017 • Hurricane Irma impacts Miami-Dade County - EOC activation September 5-17. • Mosquito Abatement Training September 27 October 2017 • Annual update of projects due by October 31 November 15, 2017 • November 15 LMS Quarterly meeting (make up for September) discussion on Public Assistance and HMGP mitigation - open to the public • November 30 deadline for update of projects for Hurricane Irma HMGP December 2017 • December 7 Meeting with FEMA, USACE, DHS and the State to discuss Infra- structure Recovery and identified needs from Hurricane Irma • December 14 Quarterly LMS Meeting open to the public • Part 4 Meeting Notes updated • Part 2 Project lists updated January 2018 • January 12 Intent to Apply forms for Hurricane Irma HMGP due • January 31 Annual Update submitted to the State • Updates to hazards to include events that occurred in 2017 Recent Development/Redevelopment Miami-Dade County Regulatory and Environmental Resources (RER) maintains a Com- prehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP) to guide future development looking out to the year 2030. A copy of the elements of the CDMP may be found in Part 4, Appendix H with a review of how these elements support mitigation measures and areas for con- sideration. In 2017 RER implemented the Evaluation and Appraisal Report for the CDMP, which occurs every seven years to ensure that the County is in compliance with state law and it provides a comprehensive review and assessment of major issues and reviews the progress towards meeting goals, objectives and policies and identified needed changes. It is estimated that by 2040, Miami-Dade’s population will grow from 2.7 million to 3.4 million people. As identified in Land Use (LU) Element, Miami-Dade is looking to emphasize develop- ment around centers of activities, development of well-designed communities containing variety of uses, renewal and rehabilitation of blighted areas and contiguous urban expan- sion when warranted, rather than sprawl. LU-3D identified that the County shall coordi- nate with municipalities in Coastal High Hazard Areas and areas with repetitive losses to minimize demand for facilities and services in areas that result in redevelopment and increases in residential densities. LU-3E addresses an analysis on climate change and the impacts on the built environment addressing development standards and regulations related to investments of infrastructure, development/redevelopment and public facilities 20 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-14 in hazard prone areas. LU-3K identifies an initiative to determine the feasibility of desig- nating Adaptation Action Areas, areas that may be vulnerable to storm surge and sea level rise impacts and LU-3L identifies that the County will work with the local municipali- ties to do the same. Per Resolution R-451-14 and Ordinance No. 14-79 all County infra- structure projects must consider sea level rise in the planning, design, and construction of those projects. All agenda items before the BCC that relate to planning, design, or construction of County infrastructure must include information on how the impact of sea level rise has been considered in the project. As of December 2017, there are 189 pro- jects identified in Part 2 of the LMS that specifically address sea level rise. Recent years have also shown increased vulnerabilities as the modeling and mapping capabilities improve and as more information is gathered on the potential impacts of cli- mate change and sea level rise. This version of the plan integrates updated information on storm surge and sea level rise and climate change into our hazards, mitigation measures, mapping and project list. LMSWG members continue to identify LMS projects to address aging infrastructure to deal with current and emerging threats. There are cur- rently over 600 projects identified for infrastructure improvements identified in Part 2. As an example, Miami Beach has been very proactive in installing new drainage infrastruc- ture and pump systems to mitigate seasonal king tides, which are perhaps a preview of what sea level rise may bring to some of our coastal communities. In October 2014, the elements of the mitigation projects that had been installed were tested by the seasonal high tide and were very successful in limiting sea water from coming up through the storm drains. Our communities continue to include mitigation in their development and redevel- opment projects through inclusion in their Master Plans and Capital Improvement plans. Agencies are proactively including mitigation projects into their internal funding and cap- ital improvement budgets, over 420 projects have been identified with these funding sources identified. A 2014 analysis of our housing stock shows that 48% of our housing stock was built before the first FIRM maps were developed and 22% of our housing stock was built before there were any special elevation requirements implemented by Miami-Dade County. The continued efforts to identify flood mitigation projects is reflected by the 853 identified flood and storm surge projects in Part 2 of the LMS as of December 2017. The LMS Project Board allows us to track mitigation measures by flood basins with the intent that we can coordinate efforts in areas of RL and SRL. As the FEMA FIRM maps were updated in September 2009 and new Coastal Flood maps are currently being studied and developed, and with the proposals of changes to flood policy rates, the LMS has embraced additional measures to help integrate CRS initiatives to assist communities with maintaining or im- proving their rating. Hurricane Andrew brought about improved building code require- ments and currently about 26% of our housing stock has been built to higher wind mitiga- tion standards since they have been adopted. In the Community Survey conducted by OEM, 57% of the respondents said they do have adequate materials to protect their home from storms and hurricanes. When we compared those that had experienced previous damage to those who did not we saw that 67% of those that had experienced previous major or catastrophic damage had materials to protect their home as compared to 41% who had never experienced any damage. 21 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-15 As many of the areas of our county are already developed, new development and re- development provide opportunities for structures to be built to or retrofitted to higher build- ing code standards that include wind and flood mitigation considerations. The Beacon Council reported that in fiscal year 2012-13 that companies interested in doing business in Miami-Dade invested $535 million in new capital investment projects. According to the first quarter Analysis of Current Economic Trends, prepared by the Regulatory and Eco- nomic Resources Department, the construction sector has grown 11% since last year but still remains lower than the 2007 peak. Foreclosure rates have declined significantly since 2014, 55% less. More than 1 million square feet of new industrial space has been constructed over the year and 1.7 million additional square feet are under construction. Representatives from RER and other local and regional planning entities are involved in the Miami-Dade LMS and continue to provide input and guidance to our plan. Measuring the Overall Effectiveness of the LMS Program The Miami-Dade LMS strives to continue to evolve and address the issues, concerns and challenges identified and encountered by our participants. Changes in personnel, shifting and diminishing funding sources, emerging and increasing threats and risk, aging infra- structure and housing stock and an increasing, diverse and transient population base necessitate the LMS to continuously take stock, re-evaluate and update the strategy. Table 1 shows an overview of how we have increased our effectiveness. TABLE 1: LMS PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS Hazard Assessment • Incorporation of the Miami-Dade Threat Hazard Identification and Risk As- sessment (THIRA) provides one source for hazard assessment for the Mi- ami-Dade CEMP, LMS and stakeholder agencies to utilize in planning and coordination efforts. 5 • Research and incorporation of climate change and sea level rise identifies potential future risk into THIRA • Incorporation of new and updated maps • Added an Economic Analysis (Part 4 Appendix J) to better understand the employment sectors and potential impacts • Analysis of housing stock to look at structures built before flood plain map- ping and regulations • Identification of tools and software to help stakeholders assess and under- stand risk. Precipitation Frequency estimates from NOAA (Part 7) • New impact assessment tool, ARM360, provided through OEM to local stakeholders to assist with damage assessment after an event to better track and document at risk hazard areas and impacts (Part 7) Collabora- tion • Collaboration with PWWM to access rain gauges and linkage with local National Weather Service to be able to better tie forecasting with real time monitoring for flooding. 5 EMAP 2016 Standard 4.2.1 (1) 22 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-16 • Collaboration with the Office of Sustainability and participation in the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact has increased the number of planning agencies we are working with. • Collaboration with WASD to utilize the ground and surface water model, developed with USGS. Stakeholders were offered training on the software so they can run analyses to better identify the potential impacts of sea level rise at a local level. • Engaging agencies for the update of the NFIP Coastal Study for FIRM maps for Discovery Meeting held June 24, 2014 • Engagement of Alliance for Response (cultural community) including work- shops and exercise Integration • Identification of the LMS as a Whole Community initiative • Review of community planning documents and identifying areas to better integrate mitigation into comprehensive planning and capital improvement (Part 4 Appendix H and added Municipal Integration to Part 1.) • The State of Florida hired a contractor who provided suggested language for the incorporation of climate change and sea level rise into the State Enhanced Mitigation Plan. Miami-Dade used this as a guide in updating the THIRA. • A review of the action items in the Regional Climate Action Plan Implemen- tation Guide was performed and supported. (Part 4 Appendix H) • Hosted L-278 class to assist local communities with the changes in the CRS manual and to identify opportunities to include elements into the LMS, included ISO personnel and newly appointed state CRS Coordinator. • LMS Coordinator active in 2015 update of THIRA including new maps and identification of vulnerable areas in alignment with Comprehensive Prepar- edness Guide 201. Project Identification and Track- ing 6 • Improved project tracking system through creation of internet based board and encouraged participants to also track any projects that they are doing mitigation on to illustrate all of the mitigation work being done locally (Part 2) • Updated the project prioritization process, Benefit Cost Review, and built it into the project submittal process to help identify benefit of projects based on Suitability, Risk Reduction and Cost and Time. (Part 2) • Began adding previously completed projects to the archive list to build his- tory of mitigation measures. (Part 5) • Added Appendix 2 to Part 2 to track Deleted/Deferred Projects Public Awareness • Annual Feel the Force event at Museum of Science discussing the haz- ards, risks and how to prepare for hurricanes and storm surge. • 2014 Feel the Force Event, added flood hazard information to the event • 2013 public information campaign for the new Storm Surge Planning Zones • 201 Community Survey to gauge the public’s awareness of hazards and risks and provide information to the community on storm surge planning zones, evacuation assistance programs, how to sign up for pet-friendly shelters and how to receive alerts. (Part 4, Appendix L) 6 EMAP 2016 Standard 4.2.2 23 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-17 POLICIES, ORDINANCES AND PROGRAMS AFFECTING MITIGATION 7 There are many federal, state and county laws and policies that affect hazard mitigation and all the members of the LMSWG. Some of those are: Federal 1. The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, P.L. 93-288 as amended (The Stafford Act) is interpreted by Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regula- tion (44 CFR) and governs FEMA and emergency management and sets forth the federal concepts for hazard mitigation. It also defines the Coastal Barriers Resources Act (44 CFR 206 subpart J) and describes floodplain and environmental management (Parts 9 and 10). 2. The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA-2K) has also redefined parts of The Stafford Act and those changes have been incorporated into this document. Much of FEMA has been further redefined by the “Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act of 2006,” which was enacted by Congress and signed into law by the President in the fall of 2006. 3. The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and the Community Rating System (CRS) FLA-15, July 1996, sets up a community rating system for flood insurance of- fering incentives for communities and credits for identified floodplain management ac- tivities. 4. National Fire Code, 1993 and NFPA 101 Life Safety Code define uniform fire safety standards adopted by rule by the State Fire Marshal. 5. Title 15 of the Code of Federal Regulations, which defines the Coastal Zone Manage- ment Act (15 CFR Parts 923 and 930). 6. Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulation which defines the National Environmental Policy Act including such mitigation measures as included in the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (Part 61), Toxic Substances Control Act (Part 763), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and CERCLA (the Super- fund). 7. Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations that defines the Occupational Safety and Health Act containing many hazard mitigation measures. 8. Presidential Decision Directives 39 and 62 are the authorities directing the develop- ment of terrorism response. 7 EMAP 2016 Standard 4.2.4 (1) 24 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-18 9. Presidential Policy Directive (PPD) 8: National Preparedness was released in March 2011. The goal of PPD 8 is to strengthen the security and resilience of the US through five preparedness mission areas – Prevention, Protection, Mitigation, Response and Recovery. a. National Protection Framework follows the guiding principles of resilience and scalability, a risk informed culture and shared responsibility. b. National Mitigation Framework establishes a common platform for coordinating and addressing how the Nation manages risk through mitigation capabilities. c. National Response Framework includes establishing a safe and secure environ- ment moving towards recovery. d. National Disaster Recovery Framework focuses on how to best restore, rede- velop and revitalize the community and build a more resilient Nation. 10. National Infrastructure Protection Plan (NIPP): provides a framework for programs and initiatives for the protection of critical infrastructure and key resources (CI/KR) and ensures that resources are applied where they offer the most benefit for mitigating risk. 11. PPD – 21 Critical Infrastructure and Resilience establishes a national policy on critical infrastructure security and resilience State 1. State of Florida Statutes which are pertinent to hazard mitigation include: a. Chapter 161 – Beach and Shore Preservation b. Chapter 163 – Conservation, Aquifer Recharge and Drainage Element c. Chapter 255 – Public Property and Public Buildings d. Chapter 373 – Water Resources e. Chapter 403 – Environment Controls 2. The South Florida Water Management District is a regional government agency that oversees the water resources in the southern half of the state through managing and protecting water resources including balancing and improving water quality, flood con- trol, natural systems and water supply. 3. South Florida Fire Prevention Code 1992-93 (adopted by the County Commission) defines standards for fire prevention and allows controlled burns as mitigation. 25 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-19 Federal, State and Regional Governmental Entities The federal, state and local entities that perform hazard mitigation functions are almost too numerous to name. However, some of the more prominent ones are: FEMA, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Occupational Safety and Health Administra- tion (OSHA), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), FDEM, Florida Department Economic Opportunities, Florida Depart- ment of Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and many more. The government entities that are located in and affect Miami-Dade County and its munic- ipalities that perform hazard mitigation functions are varied and represent all levels of government: federal, state, county and local. The Federal Emergency Management Agency has funded hundreds of hazard mitigation projects following Hurricane Andrew and to a lesser extent following the 1993 March windstorm or “Storm of the Century,” the February, 1998 “Groundhog Day” storms and more projects have been implemented fol- lowing Hurricane Irene in 1999 and the October 3, 2000 floods (pre-Tropical Storm Leslie), the tornados of March 27, 2003, the hurricanes of 2004 (Charley, Frances, Ivan and Jeanne) and most recently: Katrina, Rita and Wilma in 2005 and Tropical Storm Fay in 2008. FEMA also delves deeply into mitigation as administrator of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) to which all municipalities in Miami-Dade County are part. The USACE is responsible for restoration and renourishment of most of the county’s beaches, maintenance of the Intracoastal Waterway, maintenance of Government Cut and the Miami Harbor entrance, and some shared responsibility with the South Florida Water Management District for the canal and levee systems throughout the county. Mit- igation functions in these areas by the Corps are multiple and varied. The South Florida Water Management District is responsible for the operations and maintenance of the primary canals system, on behalf of the USACE, performing flood control operations, throughout the county, based on a schedule of operations, which de- termined when control structures are opened and closed. Flood control mitigation oppor- tunities exist to benefit all of South Florida through the placement of new and maintenance of existing structures. These structures, located throughout the county, also mitigate against saltwater intrusion into the Biscayne Aquifer from which Miami-Dade County’s drinking water is supplied. The United States National Park Service controls Everglades National Park that covers one third of the land area of Miami-Dade County and Biscayne National Park that covers over half of Biscayne Bay. The United States Department of Agriculture’s Farm Service Agency provides assistance to the farming community similar to that which FEMA provides to counties and municipal- ities. Also, the Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Ser- vice) helps with mitigation such as canal bank restoration and stabilization. 26 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-20 The United States Forestry Service and the Florida Division of Forestry both keep fire trails and fire breaks open, conduct controlled or prescribed burns and assist with debris clearance, all of which mitigate and facilitate fire control by keeping fuel levels low. The Florida Department of Transportation must be a major participant in any mitigation endeavors undertaken throughout the county. They, along with the Miami-Dade Express- way Authority, maintain and control our major thoroughfares including the expressway system. They also control, along with Miami-Dade County PWWM, Florida East Coast and CSX railroads and the Town of Bay Harbor Islands, the twenty-three movable bridges that cross the Miami River and the Intracoastal Waterway. County 1. Board of County Commission Resolutions a. R-572-00, which establishes the Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy as official county policy b. R-710-05, which authorizes the county manager to apply for, receive, expend and amend applications for projects listed in the Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy. c. R-451-14, which requires all County infrastructure projects to consider potential impacts of sea level rise during all project phases. 2. Pertinent Miami-Dade County laws include codes and ordinances that govern the un- incorporated and municipal activities, as follows: a. Chapter 8(b) of the county code, which deals with emergency management; b. Chapter 11(c) , covering Development within Flood Hazard Districts; c. Chapter 17, i.e. the Housing Code, focused on maintaining the housing stock in decent safe and sanitary conditions; d. Chapter 18b covering right-of-way landscaping; e. Chapter 24 covering the activities of the Miami-Dade Division Environmental Re- sources Management (DERM) for permitting hazardous materials; f. Chapter 28 of the county code which deals with subdivision regulations; g. Chapter 33, covering zoning activities for approval of a development of regional impact h. Floodplain Management Program sets the criteria for elevations and assesses the risks for flooding for different areas of the County; 27 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-21 i. Miami-Dade County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) man- dates that municipalities have emergency management plans, as well as recom- mends the performance of hazard mitigation activities; j. Miami-Dade County Comprehensive Land Use Plan dictates current land use and controls future land use and growth throughout the county; k. The Public Works Manual, especially Section D5, concerning coastal construction; l. Dade County Environmental Protection Ordinance, Coastal and Freshwater Wet- lands Regulations, Sections 24-58 and 24-59. 3. Miami-Dade County Landscape Maintenance Special Taxing Districts provide tree- trimming programs that prevent more severe damage during windstorms. 4. On March 1st 2002 the Florida Building Code (FBC), was adopted by Miami-Dade County and all the Municipalities, consequently replacing the South Florida Building Code. The High Velocity Hurricane Zone (HVHZ) portions of the code are applicable to Miami-Dade and Broward Counties only, the HVHZ sections of the FBC in addition to the most current ASCE- 7 standard contains a stricter design and construction measures, especially to protect windows, walls and roof from wind-born debris. In 2012, the FBC was amended to include flood protection measures and use of ASCE- 24. 5. The Local Law Enforcement Mutual Aid Agreement with Miami-Dade County designed to coordinate and supplement local resources. 6. The Statewide Mutual Aid Agreement for Catastrophic Disaster Response and Recov- ery establishes a local resource for all Working Group members that are presently signatories. 7. The Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact set forth an agreement be- tween Miami-Dade, Broward, Palm Beach and Monroe Counties to work in collabora- tion to address the impacts of climate change on Southeast Florida. The Climate Change Action Plan was subsequently developed to identify and pursue reduction and resiliency measures in the region. County Programs Stormwater Management Masterplan This program has the responsibility of the evaluation of flood protection levels of service. The Stormwater Management (Drainage) Level of Service (LOS) Standards for Miami- Dade County contains both a Flood Protection (FPLOS) and Water Quality (WQLOS) component. The minimum acceptable Flood Protection Level of Service (FPLOS) stand- ards for Miami-Dade County shall be protection from the degree of flooding that would 28 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-22 result for a duration of one day from a ten-year storm, with exceptions in previously de- veloped canal basins, where additional development to this base standard would pose a risk to existing development. All structures shall be constructed at, or above, the minimum floor elevation following the latest version of the Florida Building Code or as specified in Chapter 11-C of the Miami-Dade County Code, whichever is higher. The incorporated areas of the county (municipalities) may have adopted stricter elevation standards. Subdivision and Other Regulations. Miami-Dade County Code imposes certain developmental requirements before land is platted. These relate to the provision of water and sewer facilities, local streets, sidewalks, drainage, and open space. Before use permits or certificates of occupancy can be issued Section 33-275 of the Miami-Dade County Code requires that adequate water, sewage and waste disposal facilities be provided. Shoreline Review. The Shoreline Development Review Ordinance was adopted in 1985 and prescribes min- imum standards for setbacks, visual corridors and, with its’ accompanying resolutions, sets out a flexible review process through which architectural interest, building orientation, landscaping, shoreline use compatibility, access, and other design related elements can be negotiated with the developers and enforced by the local governing jurisdiction. Area Plan Report Since 1998, Area Plan Reports have emerged as a preferred planning technique for community visioning and helping to find answers to fundamental planning questions. An Area Plan Report is a practical planning technique, which blends public participation, detailed planning, and the development of implementation tools. Its principal focus is the creation of planning products (instead of processes. Public participation is indispensable for a successful Area Plan Report. The overriding objective is the creation of a detailed plan, which resolves areas of concern identified in the Area Plan Report study area; often these concerns involve capital improvements such as roads, sewers, sidewalks, parks and other community improvements. The Planning and Zoning Divisions of the Depart- ment of Regulatory and Economic Resources (RER) implements the Area Plan Report process as a collective planning effort that develops a small area plan which incorporates the priorities of a community. Coastal Management The Beach Restoration and Preservation Program is Miami-Dade County's mechanism for initiating and coordinating federal and/or State projects essential to the protection and recreational viability of Miami-Dade's ocean shoreline. Local participation in the determi- nation of activities pertaining to beach restoration and preservation is included in the pro- gram. The County has benefited from large federal and State funding contributions and the expertise obtained as a result of the program. Most notably, the Miami-Dade County Beach Restoration Project now provides hurricane and erosion control protection for up- land property and a vast recreational resource for public use. This project replaced a seriously eroded shoreline sustained only by bulkheads and seawalls, which offered little 29 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-23 protective or recreational value. Implementation of erosion control projects is based on the following criteria: 1. Need for protection of public safety and property in areas threatened by coastal erosion. 2. To provide enhanced beach-related recreational opportunities for both visitors and Miami-Dade County residents. 3. To provide more effective and efficient long-term management of our natural and restored beach systems. The Biscayne Bay Restoration and Enhancement Program objectives are to maintain or improve ecological, recreational, and aesthetic values of Biscayne Bay, its shoreline, and coastal wetlands. Projects include shoreline stabilization, mangrove and wetland habitat restoration, and bay bottom community enhancement at parks and other public lands. These contribute to erosion control, water quality, and fisheries and wildlife re- sources. Future capital expenditures will be directed primarily towards maintaining and enhanc- ing durability of restored beaches and to environmental improvement of the Biscayne Bay ecosystem. All of these projects are developed and carried out based on the best scientific and technical information available to the agencies involved. Municipalities 1. The Basic Emergency Management Plan sets forth the procedure for all activities of the municipality before, during and after emergencies. 2. A Stormwater Management Plan, which is focused on flood-related hazards and de- fines the relevant mitigation goals, evaluates appropriate and feasible mitigation measures and prioritizes such measures into an Action Plan for systematic implemen- tation. 3. A Floodplain Management Plan manages development in the floodplain. All cities within the county are striving to establish a floodplain management plan and partic- ipate in the Community Rating System. NFIP has stated that the LMS may serve as a floodplain management plan for its participants. 4. A Comprehensive Land Use Plan controlling growth and development within the municipality. Municipal Agencies and Their Mitigation Functions The municipalities of Miami-Dade County each have within their structure certain depart- ments and agencies which affect and promote mitigation. While these agencies may 30 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-24 have slightly different names from city to city, the role they perform in the mitigation func- tion remains the same (e.g. public works or public services or community services, etc.). Miami-Dade Public Works operates and maintains and operates drainage systems and the secondary canals throughout the County, working with the SFWMD to implement flood control operations, when required. Police and fire rescue departments: Each of the municipalities except Miami Lakes, Pal- metto Bay and Cutler Bay maintains its own Police Department while the cities of Coral Gables, Hialeah, Key Biscayne, Miami and Miami Beach maintain their own fire depart- ments, with the balance of the cities using Miami-Dade Fire Rescue for this service. Emergency responders are essential for alert and notification, lifesaving response, pre- vention and protection activities that all contribute to lessening the impact of disasters. The police and fire departments also conduct educational seminars to residents to spread awareness on emergency preparedness. The building department (or building & zoning): The functions of this department relate extensively to a wide range of mitigation projects and on-going mitigation activities. In most of our cities, the Building Official is responsible for interpreting and enforcing all laws, codes, ordinances, regulations and municipal policies related to the construction, improvement, expansion, repair or rehabilitation of buildings within the city. This depart- ment ensures that all new construction complies with the Florida Building Code which in itself is a major contribution to hazard mitigation. The department usually is responsible for the management of development in Special Hazard Areas; preservation of open space; general control of land use intensities; and coordination between the capacity of public infrastructure in relation to proposals of private development. This department also ensures all proposed development in the city conforms to the city’s comprehensive plan as it relates to urban design of public areas and buildings, infrastructure planning and maintenance of flood data and other statistical information. Planning and Development Department: Often is a part of the building department and even, at times, a part of public works. However, a number of our municipalities maintain planning and development as a separate entity which interacts within the mitigation strat- egy in many ways and must be part of the overall strategy especially in the area of urban land use. Public Works Department: In most of our cities this department is responsible for con- struction and maintenance of roads, bridges and waterways and storm water manage- ment including drainage system development, inspection and maintenance, all functions that relate in various ways to hazard mitigation. Public works activities are a major com- ponent of any mitigation strategy. Analysis of Existing Policies, Ordinances and Programs In 2014 the LMS Coordinator performed a review of a number of local policies and plans to create an Integration Document (Part 4 Appendix H). Additional LMSWG members 31 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-25 were invited to participate and assist by reviewing the Integration Document and identify- ing and reviewing other local policies, ordinance and programs so we may better identify areas where we are in alignment or areas for consideration where mitigation may be bet- ter aligned. As can be imagined, in a county as large and diverse as Miami-Dade, there are numerous planning agencies and documents that are developed. Each many times addresses the needs of their focus (e.g. transportation, emergency management) and each seems to have a different threshold for how often the plan is to be updated and the planning horizon to which it assesses the consideration of hazards and risks. The Integration Document included in this version should be viewed as a starting point for the LMSWG to discuss, review and identify areas were we as a whole community can be more effective in our approach to mitigation and resiliency. The Integration Document includes reviews of the following: • Southeast Florida Regional Climate Action Plan • Miami-Dade Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP) • Miami-Dade Emergency Management Recovery Plan • Miami-Dade 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan • Florida Administrative Code 9J-2.0256 As the population grows in Miami-Dade County, hazard mitigation laws must address new structures being built in areas susceptible to unusual occurrences either through prohibi- tion, limitation or tougher code to reduce potential losses. For example, new building construction in low lying flood areas must be limited or built in such a manner to minimize impacts from flooding. Similarly, future construction sites of natural gas, electrical and nuclear power plants must have mechanisms in place that will self-contain, or significantly limit, effects of potential catastrophic incidents. As identified in the Integration Document the Miami-Dade CDMP Plan addresses a number of planning and zoning issues and the prevention or limitation of development in risk areas. Adaptation Action Areas are being incorporated into the CDMP and they should also be considered in relation to recovery and post-disaster redevelopment. Local government and the private sector must provide ongoing training and information sessions for the public. Clear, unbiased knowledge is a key ingredient for safety en- hancement for the public. Ongoing training could include public information notices and continuous training sessions at local libraries, hospitals and schools. Part of the cost for this training should be borne by those private parties who ask or have businesses that may contribute to an unusual occurrence. For example, construction of a new electrical substation, a natural gas company building a new facility, a professional dry cleaner es- tablishment, a new gas station, etc. would have impact fees assessed to offset the miti- gation training costs. 32 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-26 Training and equipment to prepare for and subsequently resolve hazard situations are necessary and vital. Alternative financial resources must be assessed and located in addition to including these costs in all respective governmental budgets. Periodic review and revision of the local government ordinances, policies and programs must occur no less than once every other year. Each municipality that has not yet done so should adopt a floodplain management ordi- nance and participate in the community rating system program. At the present time, the Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy will serve as a floodplain management plan if adopted by a municipality. Municipal Integration of Mitigation Measures The following section identifies how the participating municipalities have incorporated mit- igation into their planning processes, policies and/or ordinances. The municipalities con- tinuously strive to expand and improve upon their mitigation measures as is illustrated below and with the extensive listing of mitigation projects identified in Part 2. Aventura On July 7, 2015 the City of Aventura passed Resolution No. 2015-40 for adoption of the 2015 Miami-Dade County Local Mitigation Strategy as the city’s Floodplain Management Plan. City of Aventura Comprehensive Plan http://www.cityofaventura.com/modules/showdocument.aspx?documentid=447 Transportation Element Policy 1.9: The City of Aventura, in consultation with the Florida Department of Transportation, shall evaluate the impacts of proposed development and redevelopment on its transportation system, Strategic Intermodal System facilities, and the adopted level of service standards of transportation facilities, and identify strategies to alleviate or mitigate such impacts in coordination with the developer and other agencies as appropriate. The City shall coordinate with FDOT, Miami- Dade County, and 28 other jurisdictions in the county in the develop- ment of common methodologies for measuring such impacts. Infrastructure Element Objective 4: Aventura shall protect and preserve the biological and hydrological functions of the wetlands iden- tified in the Land Use Element. Future impacts to the biological functions of publicly and privately owned wet- lands shall be mitigated. Publicly acquired wetlands shall be restored and managed for their natural resource, habitat and hydrologic values. Capital Improvements Element Objective 3: Future development will be permitted only when the adopted level of service standards for those services listed in the CIE will be upgraded or maintained at adopted levels of service, or when demonstrated negative impacts on hurricane evacuation clearance times will be mitigated, by ensuring that adequate fiscal resources are made available including, the proportionate cost of improvements necessitated by the develop- ment. Conservation & Coastal Management Element Policy 10.2: Structures which suffer recurring damage to pilings, foundations or load-bearing walls shall be re- quired to rebuild landward of their current location to modify the structure to structurally enhance the struc- ture, institute or mitigation measures or delete the areas most prone to damage. 33 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-27 City of Aventura Comprehensive Plan http://www.cityofaventura.com/modules/showdocument.aspx?documentid=447 Policy 10.14: The City shall implement its local mitigation strategy in accordance with the guidelines provided in the Local Mitigation Strategy: A Guidebook for Florida Cities and Counties in order to fulfill the State require- ments relating to post-disaster planning, repair, and reconstruction. Bal Harbour Comprehensive Plan for Village of Bal Harbour June 1988 Future Land Use Element Objective 9J-5.006(3)(b)4: Protect natural and historical resources Policy: Developments and construction that adversely impact on the quality of the natural environment shall not be allowed. Coastal Management Element Objective 2.2 Hazard Mitigation and Coastal High-Hazard Areas: the Village of Bal Harbour shall ensure that building, development and redevelopment activities are carried out in a manner which minimizes the danger to life and property from hurricanes. Development within coastal high-hazard areas shall be restricted and public funding for facilities with coast high-hazard areas shall be curtailed. • Policy 2.2.01: The hazard mitigation section of the Dade County Hurricane Procedure Plan shall be reviewed and updated on a 5-year basis. In the rewrites, the Emergency Management Director shall identify specific actions that could be implemented to reduce exposure to natural hazards. • Policy 2.3.06: The Recovery Task Force shall propose comprehensive plan amendments which reflect the recommendations in any interagency hazard mitigation reports or other reports prepared pursuant to Sec- tion 406 of the Disaster Relief Act of 1974 (PL 93-288). • Policy 2.3.07: If rebuilt, structures which suffer damage in excess of fifty (50) percent of their appraised value shall be rebuilt to meet all current requirements, including those enacted since construction of the structure. • Policy 2.3.08: Structures which suffer recurring damage to pilings, foundations, or ·loadbearing walls shall be required to rebuild landward of their current location, to modify the structure to structurally enhance the structure, institute other mitigation measures or delete the areas most prone to damage. Bay Harbor Islands On June 10, 2015 the Town of Bay Harbor Islands passed Resolution No. 2054 for adop- tion of the 2015 Miami-Dade County Local Mitigation Strategy as the city’s Floodplain Management Plan. Town of Bay Harbor Islands Code of Ordinances Enacted December 2013 Article 1 General Provisions 34 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-28 Town of Bay Harbor Islands Code of Ordinances Enacted December 2013 Sec. 11-5. - Seasonal and periodic flooding; protection of lives. (a)The regulation of areas subject to seasonal and periodic flooding as provided in the comprehensive plan, pol- icies 1.1(4) (page 35), 3.2 (page 36), 5.2 (page 37), and objectives 3 (page 36) and 5 (page 37) shall be imple- mented by the Code of Ordinances, including sections 5-17, 5-23.1(A)(3), (4) and sections 23-11(A)(5) and 23- 12(12). (b)While it is hereby declared that Dade County has retained the primary responsibility for seasonal and periodic flooding throughout the county as provided in county Ordinance Nos. 57-22 and 57-30, as amended, the town's Code of Ordinances shall further implement the goals and objectives of the county ordinances by re- quiring compliance with all minimum federal flood insurance elevations for all new construction and for which land use densities and intensities have been adopted in further support thereof. (c)The protection of lives as provided in the comprehensive plan, policy 5.2 (page 37), shall be implemented by the Code of Ordinances, including section 5-1, and by virtue of the Miami-Dade County retention of primary responsibility for hurricane evacuation, including responses to lifesaving and other types of emergency evac- uation. The town shall continue to coordinate and assist the county by providing minibus mass transportation to designated areas, information dissemination, and such other acts as shall complement the overall mass transit/public notice and evacuation procedures implemented by Miami-Dade County, Florida. While the county has retained the right to regulate land subdividing through the subdivision regulations, nevertheless the town shall continue to coordinate its efforts with the appropriate county agencies. (d)The town has adopted and shall maintain in full force and effect written hurricane procedures, as amended from time to time. (e)Drainage facilities for flooding and a nonpoint pollution, as provided in the town's comprehensive plan, policies 1.1.1, 1.1.2 (page 58); 1.3.1 (page 59); 2.1.1 and objective 2 (page 60); capital improvements policies 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 (page 19); and land use policy 1.3 (page 37) shall be implemented by the Code of Ordinances, including sections 5-1 and 5-17, in that the town collects and discharges stormwater runoff through inlets for the resi- dential districts and into two drainage wells for the commercial districts. The town shall continue to coordinate its efforts with Dade County, particularly with reference to protecting and preserving Biscayne Bay. The town shall continue to review its land development regulations to ensure the standards as indicated in the town's comprehensive plan. (Ord. No. 488, § 5, 5-29-90; Ord. No. 733, § 4, 12-8-03) Article III Provisions for Flood Hazard Reduction 35 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-29 Town of Bay Harbor Islands Code of Ordinances Enacted December 2013 Sec. 7½-26. - General standards. In all areas of special flood hazard, all development sites including new construction and substantial improve- ments shall be reasonably safe from flooding, and meet the following provisions: (1) New construction and substantial improvements shall be designed or modified and adequately an- chored to prevent flotation, collapse, and lateral movement of the structure resulting from hydrody- namic and hydrostatic loads, including the effects of buoyancy; (2) New construction and substantial improvements shall be constructed with materials and utility equip- ment resistant to flood damage; (3) New construction and substantial improvements shall be constructed by methods and practices that minimize flood damage; (4) Electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, air conditioning equipment and other service facilities, includ- ing duct work, shall be designed and/or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding; (5) New and replacement water supply systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of floodwaters into the systems; (6) New and replacement sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of floodwaters into the systems and discharges from the systems into floodwaters; (7) On-site waste disposal systems shall be located and constructed to avoid impairment to them or con- tamination from them during flooding; (8) Any alteration, repair, reconstruction or improvements to a building that is in compliance with the pro- visions of this chapter shall meet the requirements of "new construction" as contained in this chapter; (9) Any alteration, repair, reconstruction or improvements to a building that is not in compliance with the provisions of this chapter, shall be undertaken only if said nonconformity is not furthered, extended, or replaced; (10) All applicable additional federal, state, and local permits shall be obtained and submitted to the flood- plain administrator along with the application for development permit. Copies of such permits shall be maintained on file with the development permit. State permits may include, but not be limited to, the following: (a) South Florida Water Management District: in accordance with F.S. § 373.036(2)(a)—Flood protec- tion and floodplain management; (b) Department of Community Affairs: in accordance with F.S. § 380.05— Areas of critical state con- cern, and F.S. ch. 553, part IV—Florida Building Code; (c) Department of Health: in accordance with F.S. § 381.0065—On-Site Sewage Treatment and Dis- posal Systems; and (d) Department of Environmental Protection, Coastal Construction Control Line: in accordance with F.S. § 161.053—Coastal Construction and Excavation. (11) Standards for subdivision proposals and other new proposed development (including manufactured homes): (a) Such proposals shall be consistent with the need to minimize flood damage; (b) Such shall have public utilities and facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical, and water systems lo- cated and constructed to minimize or eliminate flood damage; and (c) Such proposals shall have adequate drainage provided to reduce exposure to flood hazards. (12) When proposed new construction and substantial improvements are partially located in an area of special flood hazard, the entire structure shall meet the standards for new construction. (13) When proposed new construction and substantial improvements are located in multiple flood hazard risk zones or in a flood hazard risk zone with multiple base flood elevations, the entire structure shall meet the standards for the most hazardous flood hazard risk zone and the highest base flood elevation. 36 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-30 Biscayne Park 2025 Comprehensive Plan Adopted Component October 2010 Conservation Element Policy 4.2 The Village shall encourage the implementation of low impact development techniques and green building standards that reduce the negative environmental impacts of development and redevelopment by: re- ducing building footprints to the maximum extent feasible, and locating building sites away from environmentally sensitive areas; promoting the preservation of natural resources; providing for on-site mitigation of impacts (i.e. retention and treatment of stormwater runoff, water reuse, Master Stormwater Management Systems); promot- ing energy conservation through design, landscaping and building techniques (i.e. solar power, increased tree canopies); promoting water conservation through landscaping and building design; ensuring environmentally friendly building practices (i.e. use of environmentally friendly building materials, recycled materials), and; con- sidering the development of a and implementation of a green building certification program, with associated regulations, incentives and standards. Public Facilities Element GOAL- DRAINAGE: THE GOAL FOR DRAINAGE IS FOR THE VILLAGE OF BISCAYNE PARK TO CONTINUE MAINTENANCE OF THE LOCAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO AFFORD REASONABLE PROTECTION FROM PREDICTABLE FLOODING. The drainage objectives to achieve the goals and which address the requirements of paragraphs 163.3177 (6) (c), F.S., and 9J-5.011 (2) F.A.C. are as follows: OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES Objective 1 To review on an annual basis information on the performance of stormwater drainage facilities. Policy 1.1 The Village will continue to comply with the 1 0 year design storm level of 10 year design storm level of service standard for stormwater drainage. Policy 1.2 The Village will continue to maintain and monitor local drainage. Coral Gables The City Manager is the Director of Emergency Management for the City. The City Man- ager has designated an Emergency Management Coordinator to head the Emergency Management Division. Emergency management functions are also part of the day-to-day functions of certain departments, such as the Police and Fire Departments. While the routine functions of most city departments are not of an emergency nature, the city may utilize all of its officers and employees in the city’s efforts to respond and recover from emergencies. This responsibility entails a day-to-day obligation to assess and report the impact of an emergency event. It requires monitoring conditions and analyzing infor- mation that could signal the onset of an emergency event. The current overall city plan is documented in a Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP). This CEMP describes the basic strategies, assumptions and mechanisms through which Coral Gables will mobilize resources and conduct activities to guide and support local emergency management efforts. The CEMP also includes an annex dedi- cated specifically to mitigation, City of Coral Gables CEMP Annex 1, Mitigation. 37 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-31 City of Coral Gables Comprehensive Emergency Manage- ment Plan, Annex I, Mitigation October 2009 Annex I, Mitigation Section B: Coral Gables Mitigation Programs and Department Responsibilities Note: Details and further information is contained in the Miami-Dade County Local Mitigation Strategy. (Page 3.) Section B: Coral Gables Mitigation Programs and Department Responsibilities 7. Mitigation Projects Completed. • The City’s Local Mitigation Strategy identifies mitigation projects that have been completed and pro- vides a list of future projects to be implemented as funding becomes available. (Page 6.) Public Safety Element Objective SAF-2.2: Assure that future development or redevelopment maintains or reduces hurricane evacuation times. The City establishes an out-of-county hurricane evacuation time for a category 5 hurricane of 16 hours. Mitigation is per- mitted to achieve and maintain these standards. Policy SAF-2.3.2: Annually incorporate recommendations of interagency hazard mitigation into the Comprehen- sive Plan and Post-Disaster Redevelopment Plan. The redevelopment plan shall identify areas which may war- rant post-disaster redevelopment, including elimination of unsafe conditions and inappropriate land uses, and limitation of redevelopment in areas of likely repeated damage. Cutler Bay On June 17, 2015 the Town of Cutler Bay passed Resolution No. 15-40 for adoption of the 2015 Miami-Dade County Local Mitigation Strategy; authorizing the Town Manager to identify and prioritize hazard mitigation grant program projects to become a part of the Local and Statewide hazard mitigation strategy. In addition the Town of Cutler Bay has integrated mitigation locally through the following plans: Town of Cutler Bay Growth Management Plan Future Land Use Element Policy FLU-8C: Policy FLU-8C: New schools will Policy FLU-8C: minimize negative impacts on surrounding areas through site location, configuration, access and development. Conversely, new development and redevelopment shall minimize and/or mitigate negative impacts on existing school facilities. Policy FLU-9M: Policy FLU-9M: The Town shall Policy FLU-9M: require developers to identify and mitigate con- straints based on soils, topography, and floodplains. Policy FLU-11E: as appropriate and feasible, shall encourage the elimination or reduction of uses that are incompatible with hazard mitigation goals and interagency hazard mitigation report recommendations. Housing Element Monitoring Measures H2-1: 1. Land Development Regulations that mitigate regulatory barriers or provide incentives for the provision of a variety of housing types. 2. Number of cost burdened households by income, age, and special needs group and tenure 3. Housing costs Coastal Management Element Policy CM-3C: Town will establish development standards in the Land Development Regulations for siting future water-related uses that address land use compatibility, availability of upland support services, existing protective status of ownership, hurricane contingency planning, protection of water quality, water depth, environmental disruptions, mitigation actions, availability for public use, economic need, and feasibility 38 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-32 Town of Cutler Bay Growth Management Plan Objective CM-4: Through compliance with Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) regulations and by targeting repetitive flood loss and vulnerable properties for mitigation, the Town will reduce natural hazard im- pacts. Objective CM-7: The Town will coordinate with the Miami-Dade County Office of Emergency Management (OEM) to develop and implement post-disaster redevelopment and hazard mitigation plans that reduce or eliminate exposure of life and property to natural hazards towards the protection of health, safety, and welfare. Policy CM-7A: inconsistencies are found with the policies under this objective and the post disaster redevelop- ment and hazard mitigation plans of the Miami-Dade County Office of Emergency Management (OEM), the Town will notify and coordinate with OEM. Policy CM-7D: Recovery Task Force shall review and decide upon emergency building permits; coordinate with Miami-Dade County, state and federal officials to prepare disaster assistance applications; analyze and recom- mend to the Town Council hazard mitigation options including reconstruction or relocation of damaged public facilities; develop a redevelopment plan; and recommend amendments to the Growth Management Plan and other appropriate policies and procedures. Objective CM-8: The Town will reduce the exposure of life and property to hurricanes through the planning and implementation of pre-disaster hazard mitigation measures. Pre-disaster planning for post-disaster redevelop- ment shall direct population concentrations away from the undeveloped identified high-risk areas during post- disaster redevelopment. Policy CM-8C: During pre-disaster planning, hazard mitigation proposals shall be developed by the Town in con- junction with other agencies and, where appropriate, included in the Town’s Emergency Response Plan or the Growth Management Plan. Policy CM-8D: Town locates facilities, the Town shall determine the feasibility and necessity of relocating public buildings away from high-risk areas. The Town shall develop a formal process and guidelines for evaluation alter- native to the replacement or repair of public facilities damaged by hurricanes such as abandonment, relocation, or repair and reconstruction with structural modifications. The costs; environmental impacts; mitigative effects; community impacts; economic development issues; employment effects; legal issues; consistency with local, re- gional and state plans; time period for implementation; and availability of funds should be evaluated for each alternative. Objective CM-9: During post-disaster recovery and redevelopment, the Town shall implement its Emergency Response Plan (ERP) and applicable Growth Management Plan policies and assist hurricane damaged areas with recovery and hazard mitigation measures that reduce the potential for future loss of life and property. Policy CM-9D: The Town will Policy CM-9D: enforce applicable recommendations of post-disaster hazard mitiga- tion plans required under Section 406 of the Disaster Relief Act of 1974. Conservation Element Policy C-6A: Wetlands that are to be Policy C-6A: protected will be identified based on the type of wetland, func- tion, size, conditions, location, and overall resource value. The wetlands shall be used for purpose that are com- patible with their natural values and functions, and Land Development Regulations shall be adopted to provide these areas with the maximum feasible protection, by using such tools as compensatory wetland mitigation and dedication of conservation easements for preserving open space. All development with the potential to impact wetland areas shall be consistent with South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) regulations. Activities in wetland areas may be permitted provided all applicable local, regional, state and federal external environmen- tal agency permits have been obtained and one of the following standards is satisfied: 1. Such an activity is necessary to prevent or eliminate a public hazard; 2. Such an activity would provide direct public benefit, which would exceed those lost as a result of the modifi- cation; 3. Such an activity is proposed for habitats in which the functions and values currently provided are significantly less than those typically associated with such habitats and cannot be reasonably restored; 4. Because of the unique geometry of the site, it is the unavoidable consequence of development for uses that are appropriate given site characteristics 39 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-33 Town of Cutler Bay Climate Change Element June 2016 The Town of Cutler Bay has already taken a number of steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and encourage environmental responsibility at the local level. The Town, along with neighboring communities, participates in the Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Program, which provides loans to property owners for solar panels, wind generators, insulation and shutters. The Town also recently gained the legislative authority to allow residents of certain areas to receive loans, which can be paid off over time, to finance the initial costs of installing an alternate energy producing device (Financing Initiative for Renewable and Solar Energy). In addition, the Town is the only municipality in the County to have achieved the Florida Green Building Council’s Silver Certification, and has adopted green building and development standards as part of its Land Development Regulations. “Climate change resilience” means the ability of the built and natural environment (including infrastructure) to adjust to and absorb climate change impacts to the maximum extent feasible. Examples of management and development practices that can increase climate change resilience include: requiring increased minimum floor elevations for new development and redevelopment; retrofitting buildings for increased flood risk; designing in- frastructure that can withstand higher water levels such as raising seawalls and installing tidal valves; implement- ing natural drainage features such as bios wales and stormwater buffers; reducing the heat island effect through increased landscaping, shading, and green building practices, and; adopting building practices that reduce vul- nerability to increased storm events. Doral On January 13, 2015, the City of Doral adopted Resolution 15-06 which adopts the cur- rent Miami-Dade County Local Mitigation Strategy in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Program Community Rating System Requirements as the city’s Floodplain Management Plan. City of Doral Comprehensive Master Plan https://www.cityofdoral.com/all-departments/planning-and-zoning/2016-city-of-doral-comprehensive-plan.pdf Future Land Use Element Policy 2.6.1: Coordinate with Miami-Dade County in implementing the approved Local Mitigation Strategy, by assessing the vulnerability of governmental, medical and public safety sites and structures in the City to storm damage, and in developing an action plan, if necessary, to address wind stability and flood protection for key buildings. Policy 2.6.4: Following the National Response Framework principles, respond to all types of disasters and emer- gencies with the primary mission of saving lives, and protecting property and the environment. Activate proce- dures under mutual aid agreements with Miami-Dade County and other area cities when necessary based on event severity. In the case of hurricanes, the City will also immediately implement the recovery policies contained in its adopted Hurricane Preparedness and Recovery Plan. Policy 2.6.5: All proposed large-scale amendments to this Comprehensive Plan and/or zoning applications shall be evaluated for their impact on hurricane evacuation routes and times, and effect on currently available off-site shelter capacities. Roadway improvements and shelter improvements shall be required, if deemed necessary, to mitigate negative impacts and phased with new residential development. Infrastructure Element Policy 5E.2.5: Appropriate local planning, development design standards, and special construction practices shall be required to ensure both short and long-term mitigation of impacts on groundwater created by activities occurring in stream-to-sink basins and in areas where the Floridan Aquifer is unconfined or semi con- fined. The following provisions shall apply: a) All new development or modifications to existing development shall provide stormwater treatment. 40 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-34 City of Doral Comprehensive Master Plan https://www.cityofdoral.com/all-departments/planning-and-zoning/2016-city-of-doral-comprehensive-plan.pdf b) Corrective action to retrofit or upgrade existing hazardous material facilities consistent with standards appli- cable to new facilities shall be required by the City. The Hazardous Materials Management Code and development regulations establish guidelines and minimum compliance standards for existing facilities. c) New development activities that involve handling or storing of hazardous materials may be prohibited in areas and shall be subject to the general requirements, siting prohibitions, storage facility standards, secondary con- tainment requirements, and monitoring provisions of the Hazardous Materials Management Code. Where such facilities exist and are proposed to be modified, development review and permitting activities shall include careful evaluation and implementation of engineering and management controls, setbacks and buffers, and mon- itoring. Existing facilities shall meet the requirements of the Hazardous Materials Management Code pertaining to such facilities. Conservation Element Policy 6.4.12: Provide for regular updates to the City’s adopted Stormwater Master Plan. Policy 6.4.13: Protect and enhance the stormwater management systems that recharge the Northwest Wellfield Area. Policy 6.5.2: Identify future wetlands to be protected based on the type of wetland, function, size, condi- tions/location, and overall resource value. These wetlands shall be used for purposes that are compatible with their natural values and functions, and land development regulations shall be adopted to provide these areas with the maximum feasible protection, by using such tools as upland buffers, exotic vegetation removal, hydro period restoration, compensatory wetland mitigation and dedication of conservation easements. Activ- ities in wetland areas may be permitted provided all applicable federal, state, regional and local external envi- ronmental agency permits have been obtained. Intergovernmental Coordination Element Policy 9.1.19: Coordinate all disaster preparedness programs with the Miami-Dade County OEM to ensure consistency with the County’s Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan and the Miami-Dade Local Miti- gation Strategy (LMS) and in updating hurricane evacuation shelter assignments. El Portal Village of El Portal Comprehensive Plan May 2002 Coastal Management Element Policy 1.1.1. In conjunction with any redevelopment of the mobile home park Little Farm Trailer Park site, pre- serve (and mitigate where possible) the natural canal banks to further marine and wildlife habitat. Policy 9.1.20 Work with Miami-Dade County in implementing the approved Local Mitigation Strategy for hazard mitigation, and by January 2007, the City shall develop a City Emergency Plan to increase public safety and re- duce damages and public expenditures. Florida City Florida City Community Redevelopment Plan February 2009 Policy 1.1: Acquire and demolish dilapidated and unsafe structures while providing relocation programs for dis- placed families if necessary. Policy 7.1: Work with appropriate government agencies and utility companies to ensure provision of adequate services including potable water, stormwater, sewer, gas, solid waste, television, and electricity. 41 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-35 Golden Beach Town of Golden Beach Hurricane and Severe Weather Re- sponse Plan 2007 Severe Weather Response Element Policy: The Town will have an organized response to hurricanes and other severe weather related emergencies in order to mitigate the effects of severe weather and to return Town services and normal living conditions as soon as possible. Wherever practical; the Town’s plan will use the same terminology and references as Miami- Dade County’s (M-DC) plan. The Town Mayor and Manager or their designees are responsible for determining when this plan will be implemented. The determination to mobilize will be based upon information provided by the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and the Miami-Dade Emergency Operations Center (M-DEOC). Additionally, it is the policy of the Town of Golden Beach Police Department is to protect life, property, and maintain order within the community during a weather related emergency. Appropriate levels of police services will be main- tained before, during and after a hurricane or severe weather incident. Hialeah City of Hialeah Comprehensive Plan 2015 Future Land Use Element Policy 1.2.14: Wetland impacts on the Annexation area: The city will develop a wetland mitigation projection based on the on-site wetlands analysis and consistent with environmental requirements and development pro- jections Conservation Element The 100-year floodplain needs to be protected to help mitigate the damaging effects of flooding. Protection of these areas is assisted through the National Flood Insurance Program and local Code of Ordinances. Flood criteria must be met before the City will issue any building permits. Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.4.2: The City shall continue to maintain an inventory of any existing hazards within the City by using the hazards analysis and hazards mitigation criteria established within the Miami-Dade County Comprehensive Emer- gency Management Plan and shall also identify any grant sources available to mitigate the hazards listed on the hazard inventory. Hialeah Gardens The City of Hialeah Gardens incorporates mitigation into its planning process as follows: City of Hialeah Gardens 2025 Comprehensive Plan October 2012 Intergovernmental Coordination Element • Policy 1.1.10 The City shall implement the provisions of the Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) Guidelines in accordance with the Interlocal Agreement with Miami-Dade County. • Objective 1.3 Coordinate the impact of development with other jurisdictions to define and implement mu- tually beneficial goals, ensure consistency among adjacent land uses, and mitigate negative development impacts. This objective shall be made measurable by implementation of its policies. The City of Hialeah Gardens has a Division of Emergency Management that is managed by Manuel Carrera. Mr. Carrera is responsible for coordinating disaster preparedness, response, recovery, and mitigation concerns for all City departments. 42 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-36 Homestead City of Homestead Comprehensive Plan June 2011 Future Land Use Element Objective 10: Hurricane Evacuation and Mitigation Ensure that development and redevelopment are consistent with hurricane evacuation plans. Measure 2: Maintain hurricane mitigation measures that are consistent with the Miami-Dade County Local Miti- gation Strategy (LMS) and facilitate the approved evacuation plans. Policy 10.1: Development orders for new development and redevelopment shall be consistent with local and regional hurricane evacuation plans where applicable. Policy 10.2: Mitigate any identified deficiencies in storm damage resistance of critical public facilities and con- struct new facilities, if needed, to assist in the City’s evacuation plans. Objective 11: Hazard Mitigation and Post-Disaster Redevelopment To the extent financially feasible, incorporate all prudent hazard mitigation needs and post-disaster redevelop- ment procedures into the City’s capital improvement planning and Land Development Code. Measure: Number of capital improvement projects and/or amendments to the land development code success- fully implemented to address hazardous mitigation needs and post disaster redevelopment procedures. Hazard Mitigation/ Post-Disaster Redevelopment Element Policy 4.3: Participate in the preparation/modification of the 409 Hazard Mitigation Plan. Objective 6: Implementation of the Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) The City continues to work with the Miami-Dade EOC and other government agencies to implement the policies, ordinances and programs outlined in the LMS. Measure: Coordinate efforts with state and county agencies to bring the community together as a single miti- gating entity. Policy 6.1: Participate in the improvements in the City’s standing and classification in the Community Rating Sys- tem (CRS), with the related consequences of making flood insurance under the National Flood Insurance Pro- gram (NFIP) more affordable and reachable, while improving the effectiveness in coping with flood hazards, problems and emergencies. Policy 6.2: Disseminate information on a repetitive basis with respect to the existence of flood hazards and the availability of measures to mitigate the problems presented by such hazards. Policy 6.3: Increase the level of coordination of mitigation management concerns, plans and activities at all lev- els of government. Policy 6.4: Improve and maintain cutting edge, state-of-the-art, and effectiveness of the City’s emergency pre- paredness and disaster response capacity. Policy 6.5: Continue our commitment to the review, update and im- plementation of the local hazard mitigation strategy. Key Biscayne On August 25, 2015 the Village of Key Biscayne passed Resolution No. 2015-38 for adop- tion of the 2015 Miami-Dade County Local Mitigation Strategy; authorizing the Village Manager to identify and prioritize hazard mitigation grant program projects to become a part of the Local and Statewide hazard mitigation strategy. The Village of Key Biscayne Office of Emergency Management (OEM) is responsible for coordinating disaster preparedness, response, recovery, and mitigation concerns for all Village departments. This section creates, updates, and administers the Village’s Com- prehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP), which provides the procedures for the Village’s response to all known hazards. The Village adopted the Miami-Dade County CEMP and developed their own municipal CEMP in 2006. This document is currently 43 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-37 being updated. The OEM is headed by the Village Fire Rescue Department and collab- orates with the members of the Village Administration, and all other Village Departments, and other members of the community. Activities include planning for a wide range of dis- asters, identifying projects that will mitigate the effects of disasters, and working towards recovery post-disaster. The Village has a full time Certified Flood Plain Manager who is responsible for the im- plementation of the Community Rating System (CRS) and NFIP compliance with assis- tance from a CRS Coordinator and a Consultant. The Village of Key Biscayne has incor- porated mitigation into their planning processes to include the following plans: Village of Key Biscayne Code of Ordinances Plan December 2010 Resolution No. 2010-53: Resolution of the Village Council Adopting the Miami-Dade County Local Mitigation Strategy Village of Key Biscayne Code of Ordinances Plan February 2014 Section 30-73-Site Plan Review Procedures Item (f)(6)g: Description of methods to be implemented during construction to mitigate adverse quantity or quality impacts off-site. Village of Key Biscayne Comprehensive Emergency Man- agement Plan September 2006 Annex-IV: Recovery H. Hazard Mitigation Plan/Program The Village of Key Biscayne has adopted the Miami-Dade County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan by reference. Village of Key Biscayne FMP Annual Progress Report for CRS Annual Recertification October 2014 Progress on FMP implementation, as required in Section X of the FMP, falls within the context of CRS compli- ance Action Plans followed by the Village. The Action Plan Items are included and tracked through the Miami- Dade County Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) Village of Key Biscayne Stormwater Master Plan Update June 2011 2.3.3: Repetitive Loss Properties One of the activities involved with the Annual NFIP CRS Re-Certification process is the analysis of Repetitive Loss Areas (RLAs). The purpose of the analysis is to determine possible mitigation solutions to minimize the flood claims. Village of Key Biscayne Master Plan December 2008 Future Land Use Element Objective 2.4 Hurricane Evacuation 9J-5.006 (3) (b) 5 Eliminate or reduce land uses which are inconsistent with applicable interagency hazard mitigation report rec- ommendations and enhance the efforts of the Metro-Dade Office of Emergency Management by providing it with all relevant information. Policy 2.4.1: The Village shall regulate all future development within its jurisdiction in accordance with the Fu- ture Land Use Map which is consistent with the Interagency Hazard Mitigation Team Report, FEMA 955-DR-FL, August 1992. The Village shall periodically review and revise the Future Land Use Map in light of future inter- agency hazard mitigation reports in order to reduce or eliminate uses which are inconsistent therewith. Infrastructure Element Policy 1.1.2 9J-5.011 (2) (c) 1: During the first phase of drainage master plan implementation (to be initiated in 1994), the Village shall begin to mitigate to the extent technically and economically feasible direct stormwater outfalls into the canals and Biscayne Bay. Anticipated improvements include a series of catch basins, manholes and pipes for the collection of the stormwater and routing to pollution control structures and drainage wells with emergency overflows. The pollution control devises (grease and oil separator) are to be provided before 44 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-38 Village of Key Biscayne Code of Ordinances Plan December 2010 each drainage well to prevent contamination from entering. Emergency overflow structures are to be con- structed at the existing outfalls and would discharge only when the storm events generates more than one inch of runoff. These improvements shall be designed to fully meet the specific standards set forth in Objective 1.1 above. Conservation and Coastal Management Element Policy 1.3.1: By the date required by state statute or sooner, the Village shall enact and enforce estuarine wa- terfront protection provisions in the land development code. The provisions will be drafted to assure that all applicable development permit applications are reviewed in the context of the mangrove protection policies of the State DEP and the waterfront policies of DERM. In particular, DERM Class 1 Permits pursuant to Section 24- 58 of the Dade County Code shall be required for all construction seaward of the mean high water line. Such construction shall be designed to minimize environmental impacts and mitigate unavoidable impacts. This provi- sion shall be interpreted to protect sensitive lands from sea wall and other related construction, but it shall not be interpreted as permitting construction seaward of the State Coastal Construction Control Line in violation of other policies of this Comprehensive Plan. Policy 1.7.14: The Village hereby designates DERM mangrove jurisdictional areas in the Village as environmen- tally sensitive lands which shall be protected from development unless their ecological value is replaced via miti- gation. These DERM areas are mapped in Figure V-1 of the Data and Analysis of this Plan. Policy 3.3.3: During post-disaster recovery periods, after damaged areas and infrastructure requiring rehabilita- tion or redevelopment have been identified, appropriate Village departments shall use the post-disaster rede- velopment plan to reduce or eliminate the future exposure of life and property to hurricanes; incorporate rec- ommendations of interagency hazard mitigation reports; analyze and recommended to the Village Council haz- ard mitigation options for damaged public facilities; and recommend amendments, if required, to the Village Master Plan. Medley Town of Medley Municipal Code of Ordinances Enacted May 2014 Article V. Provisions for Flood Hazard Reduction Sec. 30-71. - General standards. In all areas of special flood hazard, all development sites including new construction and substantial improve- ments shall be reasonably safe from flooding, and meet the following provisions: (1)New construction and substantial improvements shall be designed or modified and adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, and lateral movement of the structure resulting from hydrodynamic and hydro- static loads, including the effects of buoyancy; (2)Manufactured homes shall be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, and lateral movement. Methods of anchoring may include, but are not limited to, use of over-the-top or frame ties to ground anchors. This standard shall be in addition to and consistent with applicable State of Florida requirements for resisting wind forces; (3)New construction and substantial improvements shall be constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage; (4)New construction and substantial improvements shall be constructed by methods and practices that mini- mize flood damage; (5)Electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, air conditioning equipment and other service facilities, including duct work, shall be designed and/or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding; 45 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-39 Town of Medley Municipal Code of Ordinances Enacted May 2014 (6)New and replacement water supply systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems; (7)New and replacement sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems and discharges from the systems into flood waters; (8)On-site waste disposal systems shall be located and constructed to avoid impairment to them or contamina- tion from them during flooding; (9)Any alteration, repair, reconstruction or improvements to a building that is in compliance with the provisions of this chapter shall meet the requirements of "new construction" as contained in this chapter; (10)Any alteration, repair, reconstruction or improvements to a building that is not in compliance with the pro- visions of this chapter, shall be undertaken only if said non-conformity is not furthered, extended, or re- placed; (11)All applicable additional federal, State of Florida, and local permits shall be obtained and submitted to the Floodplain Administrator along with the application for development permit. Copies of such permits shall be maintained on file with the development permit. State of Florida permits may include, but not be limited to, the following: a.South Florida Water Management District: in accordance with Chapter 373.036 Florida Statutes, Section (2)(a)—Flood Protection and Floodplain Management; b.Department of Community Affairs: in accordance with Chapter 380.05 F.S. Areas of Critical State Concern, and Chapter 553, Part IV F.S., Florida Building Code; c. Department of Health: in accordance with Chapter 381.0065 F.S. Onsite Sewage Treatment and Disposal Sys- tems; and (12)Standards for subdivision proposals and other new proposed development (including manufactured homes): a. Such proposals shall be consistent with the need to minimize flood damage; b. Such shall have public utilities and facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical, and water systems located and con- structed to minimize or eliminate flood damage; and c. Such proposals shall have adequate drainage provided to reduce exposure to flood hazards. (13)When proposed new construction and substantial improvements are partially located in an area of special flood hazard, the entire structure shall meet the standards for new construction. (14)When proposed new construction and substantial improvements are located in multiple flood hazard risk zones or in a flood hazard risk zone with multiple base flood elevations, the entire structure shall meet the standards for the most hazardous flood hazard risk zone and the highest base flood elevation. Miami The City of Miami has a Division of Emergency Management that is responsible for coor- dinating disaster preparedness, response, recovery, and mitigation concerns for all City departments. This section creates, updates, and administers the City’s Comprehensive 46 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-40 Emergency Management Plan (CEMP), which provides the blueprint for the City’s re- sponse to all disasters whether natural or manmade. Every year the City exercises the CEMP by conducting a disaster exercise. The Division is composed of four branches, Hazard Mitigation and Disaster Recovery, FEMA Urban Search and Rescue (USAR), Ur- ban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) Grant Administration, and Public Education. The Haz- ard Mitigation and Disaster Recovery branch is responsible for all-hazards preparedness, mitigation, and recovery. Activities include planning for a wide range of disasters, identi- fying projects that will mitigate the effects of disasters, and working towards recovery post-disaster. The City has a full time Flood Plain Manager who is responsible for the implementation of the Community Rating System compliance and NFIP compliance. The City also has an Office of Sustainable Initiatives that is responsible for environmentally-focused pro- jects, including but not limited to the creation of the City’s Climate Action Plan, energy efficiency partnerships, and the adoption of green building initiatives. The City of Miami has incorporated mitigation into their planning processes to include the following plans: City of Miami Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan March 2013 Policy III.B.1: City departments will enforce all public safety mandates of the Miami City Code to include land use management and building codes; and recommend to the Mayor and City Commission, legislation required to improve the "disaster resistance" of the community. Policy III.M.2: When an emergency/disaster has occurred or is imminent, the Mayor may declare a state of emergency, activating the emergency response, recovery, and mitigation aspects of the Miami CEMP that apply to the affected area. Policy III.P.2: Immediately after an incident, local jurisdictions respond using available resources and notify State response elements. As information emerges, they also assess the situation and the need for State assis- tance...At this point, an initial assessment is also conducted of losses avoided based on previous mitigation ef- forts. Policy III.P.9: As immediate response priorities are met, recovery activities begin. Federal and State agencies assisting with recovery and mitigation activities convene to discuss State needs. Policy III.P.11: Throughout response and recovery, mitigation staff at the JFO will examine ways to maximize mitigation measures in accordance with State hazard mitigation administrative plans. City of Miami Hurricane Plan September 2014 Policy I.G.7: The responsibilities of the [Recovery Action Team (RAT)] are: • Oversee the recovery and reconstruction process and to serve as an advisory body to the City Manager. • Identify mitigation opportunities and identify recovery resources. • Ensure coordination of the recovery process. Attachment E.G.1: Receive and review damage reports and other analyses of post-disaster circumstances and to com-pare these circumstances with mitigation opportunities identified prior to the disaster in order to iden- tify areas for post-disaster change and innovation. Where needed, the RAT may review alternative mechanisms for achieving these changes and recommend the coordination of internal and external resources for achieving these ends. Attachment E.G.3: Review damage reports and other analyses of post disaster circumstances and to compare these circumstances with mitigation opportunities and identify areas for post disaster development changes. Attachment E.I.2: Identify funding sources for mitigation and recovery projects including state and federal assis- tance programs, private-sector funding and public donations. 47 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-41 City of Miami Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan March 2013 Attachment E.J.RF [Recovery Function] #19 Mitigation: To prepare a post-disaster hazard mitigation plan that will define actions during the recovery period that help prevent repeated future losses and reduce the City’s vulnerability to natural hazards. Miami-Fort Lauderdale UASI THIRA December 2014 The Miami-Fort Lauderdale UASI THIRA addresses mitigation needs through the recovery and protection core capabilities. Miami-Fort Lauderdale Urban Area Security Strategy December 2014 1.Purpose.Vision. Mission: Increase preparedness, prevention, protection, mitigation, response, and recovery capabilities within the Urban Areas and the Southeast Florida Region for all hazards, including terrorism. 1. Purpose. Effort. Based on the capability assessment and strategy review, implementation steps are in- cluded and updated under each core capability and linked to regional initiatives and activities intended to en- hance the preparedness, prevention, protection, mitigation, response, and recovery capabilities of the South Florida metropolitan areas either by: • Current, proposed, or future funding to enhance or sustain a capability or capacity needed within the juris- dictions or the region; or, • By reference to existing capabilities where no enhancement is required or cur- rently planned, but access to those capabilities is needed to fulfill the full range of preparedness, prevention, protection, mitigation, response and recovery actions for incidents of all types. Goal: Protect Critical Infrastructure & Key Resources, Objective: Physical Protective Measures, Step: Establish a joint CIP workgroup to include the private sector to set security goals, identify assets, systems and net- works; assess risks and threats annually; implement protective programs; and measure the effectiveness of risk-mitigation efforts. Goal: Protect Critical Infrastructure & Key Resources, Objective: Risk Management for Protection Programs & Activities- State, regional, local, tribal and private sector entities, in coordination with Federal participation, identify and assess risks, prioritize and select appropriate protection, prevention, and mitigation solutions based on reduction of risk, monitor the outcomes of allocation decisions, and undertake corrective actions. Step: Implement and assess the risk management model within the region and develop a plan to implement appropriate risk mitigation strategies using UASI funds. Goal: Respond to Disasters- CBRNE, Objective: Infrastructure Systems, Step: Encourage and assist jurisdictions in developing or enhancing recovery and mitigation efforts and plans. Step: Maintain liaison with county Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) coordinators. Step: Ensure that lifeline facilities are incorporated into mitigation and recovery planning. Goal: Recover from Terrorism & Other Disasters, Objective: Natural and Cultural Resources- Protect natural and cultural resources and historic properties through appropriate planning, mitigation, response, and recov- ery actions to preserve, conserve, rehabilitate, and restore them consistent with post-disaster community priorities and best practices and in compliance with appropriate environmental and historical preservation laws and executive orders. Miami Beach City of Miami Beach Stormwater Management Master Plan – Executive Summary June 2010 ES.2 Program Goals and Objectives Objective No. 8: Provide recommendations for seawalls to mitigate the effects of sea level increases over the next 50 years. As a complement to the engineering evaluation, CDM Smith utilized the FEMA’s Hazards United States (HAZUS) tool designed to estimate hazard-induced losses for use by federal, state, regional and local governments, and private enterprises in planning for risk mitigation, emergency preparedness, response and recovery. By using a standard FEMA tool, the City will benefit in the coordination of future activities related to flood proofing, grant assistance, and management of repetitive loss properties. The analysis, which was performed for South Beach, incorporated existing elevations, structure and land use data along with information from the detailed flood 48 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-42 City of Miami Beach Stormwater Management Master Plan – Executive Summary June 2010 model (SWMM). The HAZUS model generates an output that consists of a damage amount in dollars that is based on the percentage of total value loss a structure incurs during a flood event, like the statistically calculated once- in-5-year storm (5.9 inches of rainfall in 24 hours). Objective Number 8: Provide recommendations for seawalls to mitigate the effects of sea level increases over the 50 years; SWMMP Solution: Preliminary inspection and elevation standards for seawalls have been made with considera- tion of SLC, based on USACE guidance documents. A recommendation of a minimum seawall height of 3.2 ft NAVD provides a means to protect against projected spring tidal conditions over the next 50 years, based on intermedi- ate SLC projections. Miami Gardens The City of Miami Gardens incorporates mitigation actively through Drainage Improve- ment Projects. The City of Miami Gardens budgets $100,000 per year for drainage im- provement projects. This is shown in the Comprehensive Development Master Plan. The projects funded through this appropriation are tracked continually during the year. The City also continually seeks grant funds to assist in constructing drainage improvements, and leverages budgeted money as matches to increase the number of projects funded. Drainage improvement projects are also tracked through the City’s Stormwater Manage- ment Master Plan. This plan prioritizes projects based on need in the City, and their degree of flood protection and water quality improvement. The City tracks the projects by coordinating the yearly budget, the Stormwater Management Master Plan, and pro- jects listed in the Local Mitigation Strategy working group. A future goal of the City is to review the Stormwater Management Master Plan to update the priority projects, delete those projects completed, add projects as needed, and model the City again with the completed projects to determine future flood protection and storm- water quality needs. Another item in the City budget is drainage maintenance. This in- cludes street sweeping, canal bank maintenance, litter control on land and in the surface waters, and mechanical and biological controls in the canals. These activities are con- sidered mitigation in that they reduce potential obstructions in the event of a storm, and ensure capacity is present if a storm occurs. City of Miami Gardens’ Comprehensive Development Master Plan December 2006 Future Land Use Element Objective 2.6: Land Use Compatibility The City shall ensure that the land development regulations contain criteria to mitigate negative impacts that incompatible land uses may have on the neighboring areas. Objective 2.12: Hazard Mitigation and Disaster-Preparedness Coordinate the City’s Emergency Response Plan with Miami-Dade County and State of Florida to address hazard mitigation and disaster-preparedness for the safety of residents and property in Miami Gardens. Policy 2.12.1: The City Public Works Department and City Manager’s office shall coordinate with the Miami-Dade County Emergency Management Operations Center for the safety of its citizens. 49 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-43 City of Miami Gardens’ Comprehensive Development Master Plan December 2006 Policy 2.12.2: The Public Works Department shall prepare a City Emergency Response Plan to appropriately ad- dress emergency/hazard/disaster mitigation program for the safety of Miami Gardens’ residents. Policy 2.12.3: Coordinate with Miami-Dade County in developing and implementing an Action Plan if necessary, to address flood protection, storm damage precautions Policy 2.12.4: The City’s Emergency Response Plan shall include but not be limited to an incident command system structure, delegation of responsibilities for incidents, a medical procedure and ma- terials plan, outreach to the community through identified forums and public information systems, and post dis- aster mitigation plans that includes designated debris sites and personnel needs. Miami Lakes Town of Miami Lakes Comprehensive Plan 2011 Land Development Element Policy 1.2.4: Develop a code enforcement system in the new Code that is proactive in ensuring that the high standards, which are the hallmark of Miami Lakes, are maintained, and the personnel are very responsive to resident and business owner inquiries. In addition, ensure that the system allows for the mitigation and/or cor- rection of adverse nuisance impacts, such as noise, odor and/or dust, on residential neighborhoods caused by any existing commercial and industrial operations. Future Land Use Element Objective 1.6: Hazard Mitigation and Disaster Preparedness Coordinate with Miami-Dade County and the State of Florida in addressing the hazard mitigation and disaster- preparedness needs of Miami Lakes, and encouraging the elimination and/or reduction of land uses inconsistent with the recommendations of any public agencies charged with managing hazard mitigation and disaster-pre- paredness. Policy 1.6.1: Coordinate with Miami-Dade County in implementing the approved Local Mitigation Strategy, in assessing the vulnerability of governmental, medical and public safety sites and structures in the Town to storm damage, and develop an action plan, if necessary, to address wind stability and flood protection for key build- ings. Conservation Element Policy 6.7.1: Wetlands that are to be protected will be identified based on the type of wetland, function, size, conditions/location, and overall resource value. These wetlands shall be used for purposes that are compatible with their natural values and functions, and land development regulations shall be adopted to provide these areas with the maximum feasible protection, by using such tools as compensatory wetland mitigation and dedi- cation of conservation easements for preserving open space. All development with the potential to impact wet- land areas shall be consistent with South Florida Water Management District regulations. Miami Shores Hazard mitigation and disaster recovery is incorporated throughout the Miami Shores Coastal Management Element. The Miami Shores Village Hurricane Plan, 2014 outlines in detail the city and employee activities, duties and responsibilities to be conducted prior and after a hurricane event. The focus is on preparedness prior to a hurricane event and detailed recovery plan post hurricane event. 50 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-44 Miami Shores Coastal Management Element November 2013 Objective 4: Direct population concentrations away from the coastal high hazard areas, hurricane vulnerability zone and limit coastal high hazard area, hurricane vulnerability zone infrastructure expenditures. Direct population concentrations away from the coastal high hazard areas, hurricane vulnerability zone and limit the expenditure of Village funds on infrastructure within the Coastal High Hazard Area, hurricane vulnerability zone if such infrastructure would have the effect of directly subsidizing development which is significantly more intensive than authorized by this Plan. [9J-5.012 (3) (b) 5 and 6] The Coastal High Hazard Area is defined as the area below the elevation of the category 1 storm surge line as established by a Sea, Lake, and Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH) computerized storm surge model. Monitoring and Evaluation: Annual record of Village actions to direct away or reduce the population of the hurri- cane vulnerability zone. Policy 4.1: The Village shall restrict development in accordance with the Future Land Use Map of the plan. It is the legislative judgment of the Village that the Future Land Use Map provides the most appropriate way to limit development in the coastal high hazard areas, hurricane vulnerability zone consistent with reasonable property rights and long- established land use patterns. [9J-5.012 (3) (c) 9] Policy 7.2: The Village shall monitor the need for drainage system improvements. Policy 7.3: The Village shall design infrastructure with due consideration to the potential rise in sea level. Policy 7.4: The Village shall deny any Future Land Use Map density increases in the hurricane vulnerability zone. Objective 8: Hazard mitigation. In general, the Village shall regulate development so as to minimize and mitigate hazards resulting from hurri- canes. In particular, the Village shall ensure that all construction and reconstruction complies with applicable regulations designed to minimize hurricane impact on buildings and their occupants. Monitoring and Evaluation: Record of participation in Miami-Dade County Emergency Preparedness meetings, activities and programs. Annual record of development permits issued in the hurricane vulnerability zone, demon- strating the application of specific standards that result in a reduction in the exposure of human life and property to natural disasters Coastal Management Element November 2013 Policy 11.2: The Land Development Code shall be amended to require Special Approval for the repair or replacement of hur- ricane damaged buildings in the FEMA VE Velocity Zone. The criteria for granting such approval shall be as follows: 1) repair or replacement shall be authorized for principal buildings and their associated accessory buildings and structures when the principal building suffers minor or major damage; and 2) repair or replacement shall be authorized for principal buildings and their associated accessory buildings and structures when the principal build- ing is destroyed provided that the setback from the FEMA VE Zone is the maximum possible consistent with the authorized floor area, other setback requirements and reasonable design standards, but in no case less than 15 feet from the seawall, and provided further that the applicable requirements of Policy 11.3 are also met. Policy 11.3: The Land Development Code shall be amended to require Special Approval for the repair or replacement of hur- ricane damaged buildings in the Hurricane Vulnerability Zone (east of Biscayne Boulevard). The criteria for grant- ing such approval shall be as follows: 1) repair shall be authorized for principal buildings and their associated accessory buildings and structures when the principal building suffers only minor damage; 2) repair or replace- ment shall be authorized for principal buildings and their associated accessory buildings and structures when the principal building suffers major damage or is destroyed, provided that the resulting buildings fully meet the Flor- ida Building Code and all requirements of the Miami Shores Village land development code and provided further than ground floor elevations conform with the FEMA map. Historic buildings shall be exempt from this policy. 51 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-45 Miami Springs City of Miami Springs Comprehensive Plan March 2012 Future Land Use Element Objective 1.6: Hurricane Evacuation Coordinate future land uses by encouraging the elimination or reduction of land uses which are inconsistent with applicable interagency hazard mitigation report recommendations and enhance the efforts of the Miami- Dade Office of Emergency Management by providing it with all relevant information. This objective shall be measured by implementation of its supporting policies. Policy 1.6.1: The City shall regulate all future development within its jurisdiction in accordance with the Future Land Use Map. It shall also consider the most current Interagency Hazard Mitigation Team Report as part of the development regulations. The City shall periodically review and revise the Future Land Use Map in light of future interagency hazard mitigation reports in order to reduce or eliminate uses which are inconsistent therewith. North Bay Village City of North Bay Village Comprehensive Plan March 2009 Future Land Use Element Policy 2.2.9: Require property owners who lease berths to houseboat owners to provide a storm emergency plan to mitigate damage to public waterways during and after storm events and require such owners to demon- strate the financial capability to remove sunken or damaged houseboats and houseboat debris from the public waterways subsequent to storm events in which such damage may occur. Transportation Element Policy 3.2.5: Require that new development and redevelopment plans identify, by means of a traffic-way impact study, and mitigate any negative impacts the plans may have upon streets and walkways to ensure the mainte- nance of levels of service and safety within the City. Mitigation shall be mandatory to the extent that a develop- ment or redevelopment contributes to the identified impact. No development or redevelopment plan shall be permitted without an approved traffic-way impact study and mitigation plan. Policy 3.3.2: The City shall require all potential development on the Kennedy Causeway to demonstrate that the anticipated traffic impact will not cause the Causeway to fall below the required Level of Service, or to mitigate any impacts to maintain or improve the required Level of Service. Coastal Management Element GOAL: Protect human life and the environment and limit destruction in areas subject to natural disaster through implementation of hazard mitigation strategies. Policy 8.5.2: The City shall inventory and identify all reimbursable improvements in the coastal area eligible for funding under provisions of the Federal Disaster Assistance Plan and include this information in the City’s local mitigation strategy plan. Policy 8.8.3: The Recovery Task Force shall review and decide upon emergency building permits; coordinate with Miami-Dade County, State and Federal Officials to prepare disaster assistance applications; analyze and recommend to the City Commission hazard mitigation options including reconstruction or relocation of dam- aged public facilities; develop are development plan; and recommend amendments to the City’s Comprehensive Plan, Miami-Dade County Hurricane Procedure Plan, and other appropriate policies and procedures. Policy 8.8.5: The Recovery Task Force shall propose Comprehensive Plan amendments which reflect the recom- mendations in any interagency hazard mitigation reports or other reports prepared pursuant to Section 406 of the Disaster Relief Act of 1974 (PL93-288). Policy 8.8.7: Structures which suffer recurring damage to pilings, foundations, or load-bearing walls shall be re- quired to rebuild landward of their current location to modify the structure to structurally enhance the struc- ture, institute other mitigation measures, or delete the areas most prone to damage. 52 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-46 North Miami City of North Miami EAR-Based Comprehensive Plan December 2007 Future Land Use Element Policy 1.8.1: The City shall coordinate with the Miami-Dade County and the South Florida Regional Planning Coun- cil in implementing the approved Local Mitigation Strategy, by assessing the vulnerability of governmental, med- ical and public safety sites and structures in the City to storm damage, and in developing an action plan, if neces- sary, to address wind stability and flood protection for key buildings. Policy 1.8.5: All proposed large-scale amendments to this Comprehensive Plan and/or zoning applications shall be evaluated for their impact on hurricane evacuation routes and times, and effect on currently available off-site shelter capacities. Roadway improvements and shelter improvements shall be required, if deemed necessary, to mitigate negative impacts and phased with new residential development. Housing Element Policy 3A.4.5: The City shall continue to pursue and maintain funding for the Disaster Mitigation/Recovery Strat- egy Program to assist with post-disaster repairs and encourage the timely repair of homes damaged as a result of disaster activity. Coastal Management Element Objective 5A.2: The City shall implement programs and policies in conjunction with Miami-Dade County to protect residents and business from disasters and mitigate hazards. Policy 5A.2.2: As part of on-going monitoring and updating procedures, the City shall ensure that all applicable provisions of the hazard mitigation annex of the Miami-Dade County Emergency Operations Plan, and the Miami- Dade County Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) are incorporated and/or addressed in local hazard mitigation proce- dures. Policy 5A.2.4: The City shall implement the provisions included in the Local Mitigation Strategy to provide for debris clearance as well as immediate repair and replacement of public infrastructure required to protect public health and safety. Policy 5A.2.10: The City shall promote and educate the public on strengthening their structures against natural disasters by promoting the hardening of structures in accordance with the Florida Comprehensive Hurricane Dam- age Mitigation Program (My Safe Florida Home). Policy 5A.3.3: The City shall relieve deficiencies identified in the hurricane evacuation analysis and endeavor to integrate regional and local preparation and evacuation procedures into the City’s hazard mitigation measures. Policy 5A.4.2: Incorporate recommendations found in interagency hazard mitigation reports into the comprehen- sive plan and post-disaster redevelopment plan. Policy 5B.2.4: Institute marina siting criteria that address existing protective status of ownership, hurricane con- tingency planning, protection of water quality, water depth, availability of upland support services, land use com- patibility, environmental disruptions and mitigation actions, availability for public use, and economic need and feasibility. Conservation Element Objective 6B.1 Through the permitting process continue to preserve and maintain identified wetlands and water quality from the impacts of new development or redevelopment. Monitoring and Evaluation: • The City shall evaluate its permitting process to ensure that proof of mitigation is obtained prior to the release of building permits. Policy 6B.1.1: The City shall deny permit applications for new development or redevelopment projects which may adversely impact existing wetlands and water quality or quantity until satisfactory mitigation and protection measures are performance bonded by the developer. Policy 6.B.2.4: The City shall continue to provide education programs to educate residents about the polluting effect on the Bay and other natural bodies of water in the City, of run-off containing grass clippings, lawn fertiliz- ers, and other similar type material, and present techniques that can be implemented by residents to mitigate 53 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-47 City of North Miami EAR-Based Comprehensive Plan December 2007 this problem. In addition, the City shall continue to coordinate with the SFRPC’s Strategic Regional Policy Plan (Policy 14.14 and 14.17) to educate the public. North Miami Beach On August 4, 2015 the City of North Miami Beach passed Resolution No. R2015-68 for adoption of the 2015 Miami-Dade County Local Mitigation Strategy; authorizing the Town Manager to identify and prioritize hazard mitigation grant program projects to be- come a part of the Local and Statewide hazard mitigation strategy. The City of North Miami Beach is responsible for natural disaster preparedness and emergency management that is addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. This includes response, recovery, and mitigation procedures that are acknowledge throughout all City departments. The City has a Certified Floodplain Manager that administers the Com- munity Rating System (CRS) to reduce flood damage to insurable property, strengthen and support the insurance aspects of the NFIP, and encourage a comprehensive ap- proach to floodplain management. The primary duties of the Building Official shall be to intake and process permit applica- tions and associated fees; ensure permits are routed for flood elevation review; conduct the review of building permit applications for compliance with structural and technical code requirements for flood-proofing and resistance of combined dynamic, hydrostatic and wind loads; and provide backup certified personnel as needed to assist in the flood elevation review. These duties may be clarified, and other duties may be assigned in memoranda of understanding or in interdepartmental procedures for the administration of the National Flood Insurance Program and Article X of the City North Miami Beach Ordinance (SUBDIVISION AND FLOODPLAIN STANDARDS). The Building Official en- sures that of record of the actual elevation, in relation to mean sea level, of the lowest floor, including basement, of all new or substantially improved structures, flood proof from a registered professional engineer or architect, helps maintain all records pertain- ing to the provisions of this section and keep them open for public inspection and keeps a file of as-built drawings. Interagency Coordination: The City Building Official and Director of Public Works are hereby appointed to assist and cooperate with the Director of Community Development Department or designee in carrying out the requirements of the National Flood Insur- ance Program, and in the administration of this article. The Director of Community De- velopment Department shall develop interagency memoranda of understanding and procedures which shall describe the duties and responsibilities of each agency involved in the administration of this article. The Director of Public Works, the Building Official, and the Chief Code Enforcement Officer of the City shall cooperate with the Director of Community Development Department in the creation of memoranda of understanding and interdepartmental procedures which shall be approved by the City Manager. Each agency shall properly execute its duties and responsibilities as set forth in this article and in the memoranda of understanding and published procedures. In the absence of any interdepartmental guidance regarding any particular incident or program action, the 54 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-48 Director of Community Development Department shall direct immediate or interim ac- tion to be taken when time is of the essence, which direction may be reviewed and amended by the City Manager. The Police Department's Crime Prevention Division has a Community Emergency Re- sponse Team (CERT) that receives special training for the purpose of enhancing their ability to recognize, respond to, and recover from a major emergency or disaster situa- tion. The CERT basic training that is offered at the City of North Miami Beach’s Police Department, issues a training course that helps residents identify hazards that affects the home, workplace, and neighborhood. The program helps to understand the function of CERTs and their roles in immediate disaster response. For example, the course uti- lizes prevention techniques such as basic fire suppression strategies and fire safety measures in order to eliminate natural and man-made disasters. The City of North Miami Beach has incorporated mitigation into their planning processes to include the following plans: City of North Miami Beach’s Comprehensive Plan April 26, 2010 Future Land Use Element Objective 1.2: Detail a redevelopment strategy for potential redevelopment areas, including those cited in this plan (see Map 1.16, Volume Four). Redevelopment could include Future Land Use Map designation changes as necessary to facilitate enhancement of these areas. Policy 1.2.18: The City should encourage the use of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) standards in the redevelopment of the City and formalize these standards within the Zoning and Land Devel- opment Code, enhancing the safety of the City by limiting design factors which abet crime. Objective 1.3: Encourage elimination of uses incompatible with this land use plan. Policy 1.3.4: Continue to regulate the use of land in the flood zones in accordance with FEMA requirements and the Land Development Regulations, including not permitting variances from required finished floor eleva- tions. Continue to implement programs and procedures which improve FEMA’s Community Rating System score for the City in order to reduce the cost of homeowner’s insurance by 5% annually. Continue to annually reduce the number of existing structures which do not comply with these requirements and regulations. Objective 1.4: Ensure reasonable protection of natural resources and environmentally sensitive land as new development occurs. Policy 1.4.1: Continue to enforce the Oleta River overlay zoning district to achieve maximum reasonable pro- tection of the natural waterfront habitat as development applications are reviewed. Policy 1.4.2: The City shall protect and maintain natural resources and environmentally sensitive lands through the implementation of this comprehensive plan and the land development regulations. Policy 1.4.3: Coordinate the City’s land uses, development, and redevelopment activities with the South Florida Water Management District’s Biscayne Bay Surface Water Improvement Plan. Objective 1.5: The City shall coordinate with Miami-Dade County, the South Florida Regional Planning Council and the State of Florida in evaluating the impacts of development and redevelopment on hurricane evacuation clearance times, structural integrity, and disaster-preparedness needs. Policy 1.5.3: The City shall coordinate with the Miami-Dade County and the South Florida Regional Planning Council in implementing the approved Local Mitigation Strategy by: assessing the vulnerability of governmen- tal, medical and public safety sites and structures in the City to storm damage, and; developing an action plan, if necessary, to address wind stability and flood protection for key buildings. Policy 1.5.4: The City shall continue to work with Miami-Dade County to ensure that City employees are well- trained in the programs, procedures and policies required during a disaster emergency and the longer-term post-disaster redevelopment process. 55 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-49 City of North Miami Beach’s Comprehensive Plan April 26, 2010 Policy 1.5.5: The City shall evaluate all proposed large-scale amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and/or zoning applications to determine their impact on hurricane evacuation routes and times, and effect on currently available off-site shelter capacities. Roadway improvements and shelter improvements shall be required to mitigate negative impacts, if deemed necessary, and phased with new residential development. Infrastructure Element Objective 1.1: Continue to provide new or improved sewer collection, drainage and/or potable water systems in accordance with the Capital Improvements Schedule, as it is annually updated. Policy 1.1.2: The City shall continue its drainage improvement program and continue the supporting catch basin cleaning program so that adequate street drainage can be achieved and maintained. Objective 1.4: Protect the City's natural drainage and recharge areas by retaining all existing lakes and prohib- iting any new development with 100 percent impervious coverage. Policy 1.4.1: Through land development code techniques, protect the existing lakes and assure adequate per- vious areas in conjunction with new development. Coastal Management Element Objective 1.1: Continue to achieve zero (0) net loss of the 2,000 linear feet of natural areas bordering the estuarine areas in the City. Policy 1.1.2: As developers apply for permits on the few remaining waterfront sites, the City, in coordination with Miami-Dade County’s Shoreline Review Committee when necessary, shall carefully review site plans in order to minimize impacts upon the natural waterfront (and thus the estuary and wildlife), particularly their drainage and tree protection plans; a waterfront zoning overlay district may, in some cases, require mitigation of disturbed natural features through the planting, rip-rap replacement of seawalls, etc. For aesthetic and con- sistency reasons, seawalls shall continue to be the required shoreline stabilization method for residential areas in Eastern Shores. Objective 1.3: Achieve a net increase in the environmental quality of the estuary; see policies for measurability. Policy 1.3.1: City officials shall coordinate with appropriate local, regional and state agencies to monitor the commercial marinas and assure avoidance of pollution sources by reporting any violations to those agen- cies. The City shall also assure review of any proposed marina, coastal drainage project, or waterfront devel- opment by the County Shoreline Development Review Committee and Florida DEP to assure conformance with the Biscayne Bay Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) Plan (South Florida Water Manage- ment District, 1994). Policy 1.3.2: Continue the City’s street drainage improvement projects in order to minimize pollution from stormwater run-off; take special care in reviewing drainage plans for private development projects located near waterways to assure that adequate on-site retention is provided Policy 1.3.3: Annually review the development code to assure adequate protection is provided against negative impacts that may result from potential new uses in the coastal area and in any flood hazard areas. Policy 1.3.5: The City, through its regulatory processes and coordination with appropriate agencies, shall limit specific and cumulative impacts of development or redevelopment upon wetlands water quality, water quan- tity, surface water runoff, and exposure to natural hazards, wildlife habitat, and living marine resources. Objective 1.4: The amount of shoreline devoted to water dependent and water related uses shall be maintained at 3,500 linear feet along the Oleta River system and Snake Creek Canal or increased in conformance with the criteria in the following policies. Note that North Miami Beach has very limited vacant privately owned frontage on the estuary. Policy 1.4.1: Existing water dependent uses and new water dependent uses (i.e., uses which cannot exist or occur without estuarine association) should be maintained and should be regulated through zoning policies which insure environmental compatibility. New uses which increase access or preserve and protect shoreline resources should be encouraged. Policy 1.4.7: Acquire natural areas and natural habitat for conservation through County, State, or Federal Grants if possible. 56 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-50 City of North Miami Beach’s Comprehensive Plan April 26, 2010 Objective 1.6: The City shall enforce the minimum floodplain management regulations of the Federal Emer- gency Management Agency (FEMA) and the City’s Floodplain Standards Ordinance for new and substantially improved buildings. Policy 1.6.4: The City shall continue to participate in the Community Rating System (CRS) and the National Flood Insurance Programs (NFIP), and distribute information relative to its provisions. Policy 1.6.5: In an effort to minimize flood insurance premium rates for North Miami Beach residents, the City shall endeavor to maintain or improve its Class 8 rating to a Class 7 or better by performing floodplain manage- ment activities that exceed the minimum NFIP requirements of the Community Rating System. Policy 1.6.6: To prevent further additions to the list of Repetitive Loss (RL) properties published by FEMA, the City shall remain committed to working on eliminating RL properties within the City to a point that qualifies as a category A or B Community. Policy 1.6.7: The City shall continue to enforce Chapter XXIV Zoning and Land Development Code, in an effort to eliminate an increase in the number of RL properties. Policy 1.6.8: The City should attempt to promote the acquisition, or retrofit of RL properties. Policy 1.6.9: The Coastal High Hazard Area is defined as the area below the elevation of the Category 1 storm surge line as established by a Sea, Lake and Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH) computerized storm surge model. The Coastal High Hazard Area is identified on the Future Land Use Map. Objective 2.1: The City shall maintain or mitigate the impacts of development on the prescribed hurricane evacuation clearance times identified in the South Florida Regional Planning hurricane evacuation model up- date. Policy 2.1.2: Continue to cooperate with Miami-Dade Police and the County Fire Department’s Office of Emer- gency Management, the Red Cross and FEMA through evacuation planning meetings and policies, and in other ways conform to the Metro-Dade Emergency Operations Plan for a Hurricane. Policy 2.1.3: In order to reduce the potential for loss of life and severe property damage, encourage the reduc- tion of densities and intensities in areas likely to be inundated by flooding resulting from hurricane surge as shown by Map 5.3, Volume Four, implement a building code consistent with FEMA requirements, and when possible through grant funding eliminate the potential for increased residential and urban densities in those areas by purchasing such lands for use as public open space and shoreline access. Policy 2.1.4: The City shall participate in regional solutions that aim to reduce overall evacuation clearance times. Policy 2.1.5: The City shall address deficiencies identified in the hurricane evacuation analysis and endeavor to integrate regional and local preparation and evacuation procedures into the City’s hazard mitigation measures. Coastal Management Element continued Objective 2.2: The City of North Miami Beach shall provide immediate response to post-hurricane situations in concert with a post-disaster redevelopment plan, which will reduce or eliminate the exposure of human life and public and private property to natural hazards. Measure: This objective shall be measured by progress in implementing its policies. Policy 2.2.3: The Recovery Task Force shall include the City Manager, Police Chief, Emergency Management Director, Community Development Director, Building Official, Public Works Director, Parks & Recreation Direc- tor and other City staff members as directed by the City Council. Staff shall be provided by the departments whose directors sit on the Task Force. The Task Force shall be terminated after implementing its responsibility under Policy 2.2.6. Policy 2.2.4: The Recovery Task Force shall review and decide upon emergency building permits; coordinate with Miami-Dade County, State and Federal Officials to prepare disaster assistance applications; analyze and recommend to the City Council hazard mitigation options including reconstruction or relocation of damaged public facilities; develop a redevelopment plan; and recommend amendments to the comprehensive plan, Mi- ami-Dade County Hurricane Procedure Plan and other appropriate policies and procedures. Policy 2.2.5: Immediate repair and clean-up actions needed to protect the public health and safety include repairs to potable water, wastewater and power facilities; removal of building and/or vegetable debris; stabili- zation or removal of structures about to collapse; and minimal repairs to make dwellings habitable such as 57 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-51 City of North Miami Beach’s Comprehensive Plan April 26, 2010 minor roof repairs and other weatherproofing/security measures. These actions shall receive first priority in permitting decisions. Long-term development activities shall be postponed until the Recovery Task Force has completed its tasks. Policy 2.2.6: The Recovery Task Force shall propose comprehensive plan amendments which reflect the recom- mendations in any interagency hazard mitigation reports or other reports prepared pursuant to Section 406 of the Disaster Relief Act of 1974 (PL93-288). Policy 2.2.7: If rebuilt, structures which suffer damages in excess of fifty (50) percent of their appraised value shall be rebuilt to meet all current requirements, including those enacted since construction of the structure. Policy 2.2.8: Repair or reconstruction of the existing seawalls within the City shall be done using only pre-fab- ricated concrete or cement, which may be augmented at the base only by decorative material (rip-rap), shall be similar in height and appearance to adjoining lots, pursuant to the Land Development Regulations. Policy 2.2.9: Following a natural disaster and prior to the implementation of long-term redevelopment, the City shall do the following: Based upon the damage assessment report prepared by the Miami-Dade Public Works Department, the City shall consult with its Public Works officials and consultant engineer to evaluate options for damaged public facilities including abandonment, repair in place, relocation and repair with structural mod- ification, to determine the most strategic approach to long-term development. The evaluation shall include, but not be limited to, issues pertaining to damage caused by natural disaster, cost to construct repairs, cost to relocate, cost to structurally modify, limitations of right-of-way, and maintenance costs. Objective 2.4: The City’s Emergency Preparedness Committee shall review its hurricane preparation plans and post-disaster redevelopment plans annually to insure that risks are mitigated to the furthest extent possible and that its plans are in conformance with the most recent Objectives and Procedures developed by the Miami- Dade County Evacuation Planning Task Force. The City shall annually review its Hurricane Procedures in March of each year Policy 2.4.1: Continue to enforce building codes, floodplain regulations, design criteria, and zoning regulations established to protect new structures, reduce redevelopment costs, and mitigate hurricane hazards. Policy 2.4.2: Zoning district boundaries and land development regulations shall be maintained or revised as necessary to insure that no new hospitals or mobile homes that do not meet the criteria for manufactured housing are constructed in the coastal area. Objective 2.6: The City shall take measures towards hurricane preparation, hazard mitigation and plan for post- disaster redevelopment. Policy 2.6.2: Encourage public awareness and education regarding appropriate responses to a variety of emer- gencies as feasible and appropriate utilizing such mechanisms as websites, public access television stations, and newsletters. Policy 2.6.3: Coordinate with the County to ensure the availability of emergency shelter for residents required to evacuate areas adversely affected by natural disasters. Policy 2.6.4: Work with the South Florida Regional Planning Council in its role as the region’s Economic Devel- opment District Coordinator to seek hazard mitigation funding from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Eco- nomic Development Administration to fund the organizational and training activities of the Business Disaster Mitigation and Recovery Assistance Program. Policy 2.6.5: Consider reducing building permit application fees for disaster resistant shutters, doors, windows, and roof clips for businesses participating in the Business Disaster Mitigation and Recovery Assistance Program Policy 2.6.6: The City shall ensure that all applicable provisions of the hazard mitigation annex of the Miami- Dade County Emergency Operations Plan, and the Miami-Dade County Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS), are incorporated and/or addressed in local hazard mitigation procedures. Policy 2.6.7: The City shall monitor problems and life-threatening situations resulting from natural disaster events and take the necessary steps to ensure that the potential for such problems and situations are minimized in the future. Policy 2.6.8: The City shall implement the Local Mitigation Strategy and Post-Disaster Redevelopment Plan to provide for debris clearance as well as immediate repair and replacement of public infrastructure required to protect public health and safety. 58 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-52 City of North Miami Beach’s Comprehensive Plan April 26, 2010 Policy 2.6.9: The City shall make every effort to support and implement the initiatives and projects listed in the Local Mitigation Strategy, including both countywide initiatives and the proposed hazard mitigation projects located in the City. Policy 2.6.10: The City will promote the hardening of structures to increase resistance against natural disasters pursuant to the Florida Comprehensive Hurricane Damage Mitigation Program (My Safe Florida Home). Conservation Element Objective 1.2: Continue to pursue drainage practices and programs that minimize ground and surface water pollution, including pollution to the Biscayne Aquifer; experience no increase in the amount of properties, de- velopments, or facilities polluting ground water or surface water as the result of non-implementation of such practices and programs. Measure: Number of properties developed or redeveloped without technical review insuring that proposed drainage at the site minimizes ground and surface water pollution. Policy 1.2.1: Continue to make street drainage improvements City-wide. Objective 1.3: Protect existing rare or threatened vegetative communities, natural ecosystems, listed animal species and their habitat, sensitive soils, and estuarine communities against any further degradation. Achieve 0 net loss of the 2,000 lineal feet of natural shoreline bordering the estuary. Policy 1.3.4: Further landscape and extend the linear park along the Snake Creek Canal in an effort to assist wildlife and riverine habitat conservation, including the removal of invasive, nuisance vegetation. Policy 1.5.6: Continue to restrict activities known to adversely affect endangered and threatened wild life, and require mitigation measures for activities impacting native vegetative communities. Objective 1.6: The City shall seek to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to the maximum extent feasible and conserve energy resources. In developing the 2012 Evaluation and Appraisal Report and associated amend- ments, the City shall establish and adopt a percentage goal for greenhouse gas reduction consistent with Mi- ami-Dade County’s greenhouse gas reduction goal. Measure: The number of specific programs initiated to re- duce greenhouse gas emissions, percentage reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, acres of mixed use devel- opment as a percentage of total development, and the estimated reduction of vehicle miles travelled as a result of these efforts. Policy 1.6.2: The City shall require low impact development techniques and green building standards that re- duce the negative environmental impacts of development and redevelopment by: reducing building footprints to the maximum extent feasible, and locating building sites away from environmentally sensitive areas; pro- moting the preservation of natural resources; providing for on-site mitigation of impacts (i.e. retention and treatment of stormwater runoff, water reuse, Master Stormwater Management Systems); promoting energy conservation through design, landscaping and building techniques (i.e. solar power, increased tree canopies); promoting water conservation through landscaping and building design; ensuring environmentally friendly building practices (i.e. use of environmentally friendly building materials, recycled materials), and; considering the development and implementation of a green building certification program, with associated regulations, incentives and standards. Opa-locka Opa-locka Code of Ordinances Adopted October 2014 Article VI Flood Damage Protection Sec. 7-75. - Purpose. This article is to insure the continued availability of flood insurance through the National Flood Insurance Pro- gram; to comply with federally imposed requirements; and to protect the public health, safety and general wel- fare, by minimizing flood losses in the flood hazard areas of the City of Opa-locka, and to require that uses vul- nerable to floods, including facilities which serve such uses, be protected against flood damage at the time of initial construction and substantial improvement; control the alteration of natural floodplains, stream channels, 59 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-53 Opa-locka Code of Ordinances Adopted October 2014 and natural protective barriers which are involved in the accommodation of flood waters; control filling, grad- ing, dredging and other development which may increase erosion or flood damage, and; to insure that potential home buyers are notified that property is in a flood area. Sec. 7-78. - Standards for development within special flood hazard (SFH) areas. (a) No new construction and substantial improvement of any residential structure or manufactured home shall be permitted in SFH Areas, and no development permit referred to in section 7-77 of this chapter shall be issued therefore, unless said new construction and substantial improvement has the lowest floor (including basement) elevated to or above the regulatory flood (100-year flood) elevation. Electrical, plumbing, air conditioning and other attendant utilities must be constructed, designed, and/or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within their components during conditions of flooding. (b) No new construction and substantial improvement of any nonresidential structure shall be permitted in SFH Areas, and no development permit referred to in section 7-77 of this chapter shall be issued therefore, unless said development has the lowest floor (including basement) elevated to or above the level of the base flood (100-year flood). If the lowest permitted floor level of such nonresidential structure (including basement) is below the regulatory flood level then such nonresidential structure together with attendant utility and sanitary facilities shall be flood-proofed to one (1) foot above the level of the base flood; pro- vided that the lowest floor level of such nonresidential structure (including basement) shall be not more than ten (10) feet below the base flood level. Where flood proofing is utilized for a particular structure, a registered professional engineer or architect shall certify that the floodproofing methods are adequate to withstand the flood depth, pressures, velocities, impact and uplift forces associated with the base flood, and a record of such certificates indicating the specific elevation (in relation to mean sea level) to which such structure is floodproofed shall be maintained with the designated official. (c) All manufactured homes placed, or substantially improved, on individual lots or parcels, in expansions to existing manufactured home parks or subdivisions, in new manufactured home parks, in substantially im- proved manufactured home parks, shall meet all of the requirements for "new construction", including elevation in accordance with section 7-78(a) and anchoring requirement of section 7-77(c)(2). (d) All manufactured homes placed, or substantially improved in an existing manufactured home park or sub division shall be elevated so that: (1) The lowest floor of the manufactured home is elevated no lower than the base flood elevation; or (2) The manufactured home chassis is supported by reinforced piers or other foundation elements of at least an equivalent strength, of no less than thirty-six (36) inches in height above grade. (3) The manufactured home shall be securely anchored to the adequately anchored foundation system to resist flotation, collapse and lateral movement. (4) In an existing manufactured home park or subdivision in which a manufactured home has incurred "substantial damage as the result of a flood, any manufactured home placed or substantially improved shall meet the standards of section 7-78(a) and 7-77(3). (e) All recreational vehicles placed within this area shall either: (1) Be on site for fewer than one hundred eighty (180) consecutive days; (2) Be fully licensed and ready for highway use; or (3) The recreational vehicle shall meet all the requirements for new construction, including anchoring and elevation requirements of section 7-78(c). (4) Be on the site for fewer than one hundred eighty (180) consecutive days. A recreational vehicle is ready for highway use if it is on its wheels or jacking system, is attached to the site only by quick dis- connect type utilities and security devices and has no permanently attached structures. 60 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-54 Opa-locka Code of Ordinances Adopted October 2014 (f) Elevated buildings. New construction and substantial improvements of elevated buildings that include fully enclosed areas formed by foundations and other exterior walls below the lowest floor shall be de- signed to preclude finished living space except allowable uses (i.e. parking, limited storage and building access) and shall be designed to allow for the entry and exit of floodwaters to automatically equalize hy- drostatic flood forces on exterior walls. Designs for complying with this requirement must either meet or exceed the following minimum criteria or be certified by a professional engineer or architect: (1) Provide a minimum of two (2) openings having a total net area of not less than one (1) square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding; (2) The bottom of all openings shall be no higher than one (1) foot above grade; and (3) Openings may be equipped with screens, louvers, valves or other coverings or devices provided they permit the automatic flow of floodwaters in both directions; Electrical, plumbing, air conditioning and other utility connections must be constructed, designed, and/or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. Access to the enclosed area shall be the minimum necessary to allow for parking of vehicles (garage door), (standard exterior door), or entry to the living area (stairway or elevator); the interior portion of such enclosed area shall not be finished or partitioned into separate rooms or air conditioned. (g) Notify, in river line situations, adjacent communities and the Florida NFIP Coordinating Office to any al- teration or relocation of a watercourse, and submit copies of such notifications to FEMA; (h) The flood carrying capacity within the altered or relocated portion of any watercourse shall be main- tained. (Ord. No. 12-09, § 2, 4-11-12) Palmetto Bay Palmetto Bay is joining the Community Rating System program and integrating addi- tional activities to benefit their residents by reducing the risks of flooding. The FY 2104- 2015 Budget contains budgeting for canal drainage systems and for on-going preven- tative maintenance to maximized the efficiency of the system and reduce roadway pond- ing and flooding. Village of Palmetto Bay Comprehensive Plan March 2015 Future Land Use Element Objective 1.6 Coastal High Hazard and Disaster Preparedness Coordinate with Miami-Dade County and the State of Florida in addressing the land use planning, evacuation, structural integrity, and disaster-preparedness needs of Palmetto Bay. Policy 1.6.2 Coordinate with Miami-Dade County in implementing the approved Local Mitigation Strategy, by assessing the vulnerability of governmental, medical, and public safety sites and structures in the Village to storm damage, and in developing an action plan, if necessary, to address wind stability and flood protection for key buildings. Coastal Management Element Objective 5.3 Flood Protection The Village will reduce natural hazard impacts through compliance with federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) regulations and by targeting repetitive flood loss and vulnerable properties for mitigation. 61 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-55 Village of Palmetto Bay Comprehensive Plan March 2015 Objective 5.8 Post Disaster Redevelopment and Hazard Mitigation Coordinate with the Miami-Dade County Office of Emergency Management (OEM) to develop and implement post-disaster redevelopment and hazard mitigation plans that reduce or eliminate exposure of life and property to natural hazards towards the protection of health, safety, and welfare within the Village. Policy 5.8.2 The Village shall enforce applicable recommendations of post disaster hazard mitigation plans re- quired under Section 405 of the Disaster Relief Act of 1974. Pinecrest The Village of Pinecrest is currently working on a Stormwater Basin Master Plan to eval- uate the existing stormwater infrastructure and look at the current Level of Service and identify and prioritize any problem areas. The Plan will model and look at current and future conditions for 24-hour, 2-year, 10-year, 25-year, 50-year and 100-year storm events including consideration for sea level rise. Pinecrest is also going through the pro- cess to become a Community Rating System Community. Resolution 2011-63 2011 Resolution of the Village of Pinecrest, Florida Authorizing the Village Manager to execute an Interlocal Agreement with Other Municipalities Relating to the Green Corridor Property Assessment Clean Energy (PACE District. WHEREAS, pursuant to section 163.08, Florida Statutes, the improved property that has been retrofitted with energy-related qualifying improvements receive special benefit of alleviating the property's burden from energy consumption and assists in the fulfillment of the state's energy and hurricane mitigation policies; and … WHEREAS, the Village Council wishes to enter into an interlocal agreement with the Town of Cutler Bay and other municipalities to participate in the District in order to provide financing for qualifying improvements as provided for in F.S. 163.08; South Miami City of South Miami Comprehensive Plan 2010 Intergovernmental Coordination Element Policy 1.3.7 The City will coordinate with the emergency management program of Miami-Dade County y notify- ing the County of any current or future land use policies or population changes which would affect hurricane shelters or emergency evacuation routes. Policy 1.3.11 The City will participate with Miami-Dade County in the planning and implementation of the County’s Hazard Mitigation Plan, as it impacts the City of South Miami. Future Land Use Element OBJECTIVE 4.4 Preserve floodplain areas via floodplain management and limiting development within the Special Flood Hazard Area. Policy 4.4.1 in coordination with the Transit-Oriented Development District, permit more intense development only in those areas which are located outside of the Special Flood Hazard Area. Policy 4.4.2 Building density and intensity may be transferred from areas within the Special Flood Hazard Area, in order to permit development within the Transit-Oriented Development District, while reducing the permitted intensities within the Special Flood Hazard Areas. 62 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-56 Sunny Isles Beach City of Sunny Isles Beach Comprehensive Plan October 2000 Future Land Use Element Policy 3P: Applications for rezoning, zoning variances or subdivision approvals for all new development in areas subject to coastal flooding shall be reviewed for emergency evacuation, sheltering, hazard mitigation, and post- disaster recovery and redevelopment. Transportation Element Objective 3: Transportation Network Safety & Efficiency The City shall improve the safety, and efficiency of the City's roadway system through transportation system man- agement (TSM) techniques, including: access management (Policies 3A-D), improved intersection operations (Pol- icy 3E), traffic calming along residential streets (Policy 3F), mitigation by developers (Policy 3G), accident analysis (Policy 3H, 31), and maintaining visibility for pedestrians, vehicles, and cyclists (Policy 3J). Surfside Town of Surfside Comprehensive Plan January 2010 Future Land Use Element Objective 7 : Coordination of population with hurricane evacuation plans: Coordinate population densities with the applica- ble local or regional coastal evacuation plan [9J-5.006 (3) (b) 5] and coordinate future land uses by encouraging the elimination or reduction of land uses which are inconsistent with applicable interagency hazard mitigation report recommendations [9J-5.006 (3) (b) 6]. This objective shall be measured by implementation of its support- ing policies. [9J5.006 (3) (b) 5 and 6]. Policy 7.2: The Town shall regulate all future development within its jurisdiction in accordance with the goals and objectives of the “The Local Mitigation Strategy for Miami-Dade County and its Municipalities, Departments and Private Sector Partners” (June 2008). The Town shall periodically review and revise the Future Land Use Map in light of future interagency hazard mitigation reports in order to reduce or eliminate uses which are in- consistent therewith. Policy 5.5: Consideration for the relocation, mitigation or replacement of any of the existing infrastructure in the Coastal High Hazard Area, as may be deemed appropriate by the Town, shall be coordinate with the state when state funding is anticipated to be needed for implementation of the project. al Management Element Policy 6.5: The Town shall adopt a Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan in order to prepare for, re- spond to, recover from and mitigate potential hazard by December 2011. Objective 11: Hazard mitigation In general, the Town shall regulate development so as to minimize and mitigate hazard resulting from hurri- canes. In particular, the Town shall ensure that all construction and reconstruction complies with applicable reg- ulations designed to minimize hurricane impact on buildings and their occupants. Policy 11.5: The Town shall continue to enforce regulations and codes which provide for hazard mitigation, in- cluding but not limited to, land use, building construction, placement of fill, flood elevation, sewer, water and power infrastructure, and stormwater facilities. These regulations shall be applied to eliminate unsafe condi- tions, inappropriate uses and reduce hazard potentials. Policy 11.6: The Town shall increase public awareness of hazards and their impacts by providing hazard mitiga- tion information to the public. Information shall address evacuation, sheltering, building techniques to reduce hazards as well as other hazard mitigation issues that could help prevent loss of life and property. 63 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-57 Town of Surfside Comprehensive Plan January 2010 Policy 11.9: The Town shall, as deemed appropriate, incorporate the recommendation of the hazard mitigation annex of the local emergency management plan and shall analyze and consider the recommendations from in- teragency hazard mitigation reports. Policy 11.10: The Town shall include criteria in the five (5) year schedule of Capital Improvement projects to in- clude consideration for and prioritization for projects that are hazard mitigation initiatives. Sweetwater On October 2016, the City adopted a Floodplain Management Ordinance (Ordinance 4230) to meet the requirements of the NFIP and coordination with the Florida Building Code. The model ordinance specifically repealed and replaced the City Chapter 35 named "Floodplain Management Regulations" (Ordinance 3427 September 28, 2009) to satisfy the NFIP, to coordinate with the FBC, and to meet the requirements of section 553.73 (5), F.S. This ordinance applies to all flood hazard areas within the City of Sweet- water. ORDINANCE 4230 https://egscfl.dattodrive.com/index.php/s/qheSmrtjduvatmc City of Sweetwater Code of Ordinances 2016 Sec. 35-102.3. - Basis For Establishing The Areas of Special Flood Hazard The Flood Insurance Study for Miami-Dade County, Florida and Incorporated Areas dated September 11, 2009, and all subsequent amendments and revisions, and the accompanying Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM), and all subsequent amendments and revisions to such maps, are adopted by reference as a part of this ordinance and shall serve as the minimum basis for establishing flood hazard areas. Studies and maps that establish flood hazard areas are on file at the City of Sweetwater Building Department. Sec. 35-102.4 Submission of additional data to establish flood hazard areas To establish flood hazard areas and base flood elevations, pursuant to Section 35.105 of this ordinance the Flood- plain Administrator may require submission of additional data. Where field surveyed topography prepared by a Florida licensed professional surveyor or digital topography accepted by the community indicates that ground elevations: (1) Are below the closest applicable base flood elevation, even in areas not delineated as a special flood hazard area on a FIRM, the area shall be considered as flood hazard area and subject to the requirements of this ordinance and, as applicable, the requirements of the Florida Building Code. (2) Are above the closest applicable base flood elevation, the area shall be regulated as special flood hazard area unless the applicant obtains a Letter of Map Change that removes the area from the special flood hazard area. Require lowest floor above base flood elevation Sec. 35-301.2 Specific methods of construction and requirements. Pursuant to Chapter 8 Article Ill of the Miami Dade County Code, the following specific methods of construction and requirements apply: (1) Additional Elevation (Freeboard) for Buildings. For buildings in special flood hazard areas, the minimum eleva- tion requirements in the Florida Building Code shall be to or above the base flood elevation plus one (1) foot. (2) Limitations on Enclosures Under Elevated Buildings. For buildings located in the special flood hazard area, enclosures shall: a. Have the minimum necessary access to allow for parking of vehicles (garage door), limited storage of maintenance equipment used in connection with the premises (standard exterior door), or entry to the elevated building (stairway or elevator). b. Not have the interior portion partitioned or finished into separate rooms other than separation of parking from storage and building access. (3) Flood Damage and Substantial Damage. In the Florida Building Code, Building, and Florida Building Code, Ex- isting Building, definitions for the term "Substantial Damage" shall be as follows: 64 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-58 City of Sweetwater Code of Ordinances 2016 Substantial damage. Damage of any origin sustained by a building or structure whereby the cost of restoring the building or structure to its before-damaged condition would equal or exceed 50 percent of the market value of the building or structure before the damage occurred. The term also includes flood-related damage sustained by a structure on two separate occasions during a 10-year period for which the cost of repairs at the time of each such flood event, on average, equals or exceeds 25 percent of structure before the damage occurred. 35.102.7 Interpretation. In the interpretation and application of this ordinance, all provisions shall be: (1) Considered as minimum requirements; (2) Liberally construed in favor of the governing body; and (3) Deemed neither to limit nor repeal any other powers granted under state statutes Virginia Gardens Village of Virginia Gardens Provisions For Flood Hazard Reduction Code of Ordinances August 2013 Article X. Floodplain Management 10.1 Administration: Duties of the Administrator shall include, but are not be limited to: Verify and record the actual elevation (in relation to mean sea level) of the lowest floor (A-Zones) or bottom of the lowest horizontal structural member of the lowest floor (V-Zones) of all new and substantially improved build- ings, in accordance with Article 5, Section B (1) and (2) and Section E (2), respectively; Verify and record the actual elevation (in relation to mean sea level) to which the new and substantially improved buildings have been flood-proofed, in accordance with Article 5, Section B (2); 6.11 Stormwater Management Code of Ordinances 6.11.3 Design Standards To comply with the foregoing performance standards, the proposed storm water management system shall con- form to the following standards: A. To the maximum extent practicable, natural systems shall be used to accommodate stormwater. B. The proposed stormwater management system shall be designed to accommodate the stormwater that origi- nates within the development and stormwater that flows onto or across the development from adjacent lands. The proposed stormwater management system shall be designed to function properly for a minimum twenty (20) year life. C. The design and construction of the proposed stormwater management system shall be certified as meeting the requirements of this Code by a professional engineer registered, in the State of Florida. D. No surface water may be channeled or directed into a sanitary sewer. West Miami City of West Miami Comprehensive Plan 2000 Costs and Funding For Proposed Program Objective 7 : As per 9J-5 .016 (2) (c), this section of the Capital Improvements Element provides a cost analysis of the capital improvements identified for mitigation of existing deficiencies, replacement and new growth needs pursuant to the Future Land Use Element. 65 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-59 MITIGATION GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 8 Mitigation goals and objectives must be consistent with the goals and objectives of the county and the individual municipalities’ master plans, their codes and ordinances, as well as other endeavors that reflect the aspirations for the welfare, safety and quality of life of their citizens. Goals 1. Reduce Miami-Dade’s vulnerability to natural and man-made hazards Objectives: 1.1. Incorporate new and more accurate data, studies and maps that demonstrate the evolution of risk in the county 1.2. Identify new and emerging mitigation methods and products for new and retro- fitting construction 1.3. Identify projects that mitigate expected impacts from hazards identified in the THIRA 1.4. Promote mitigation measures to the Whole Community through outreach and education 1.5. Harden building envelope protection – including all openings – and inclusion of a continuous load path from roof to foundation on all structures within the county 1.6. Reduce flooding from rainfall events 1.7. Reduce storm surge hazards and effects by encouraging greater setbacks from shorelines for new developments of waterfront properties, encouraging retrofit- ting and elevation of structures with high priority consideration for those built on waterfront properties, seeking opportunities to acquire, exchange or otherwise secure limited control of waterfront real estate 2. Minimize future losses from all hazard impacts by reducing the risk to people and property Objectives: 2.1. Adopt land use policies that limit, prohibit or mandate development and con- struction standards to promote resiliency and reduce risk 2.2. Adopt building codes leading to building design criteria based on site-specific evolving and future risk 2.3. Identify mitigation projects that reduce risk to vulnerable populations that are at greater risk from hazards 2.4. Integrate mitigation into existing structures during regular maintenance and re- placement cycles 8 EMAP 2016 Standard 4.2.1.(3) 66 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-60 3. Implement mitigation projects that meet or exceed current codes Objectives: 3.1 Design and develop projects that address both current and future risk 3.2 Identify projects to address potential threats from climate change such as sea level rise and the impacts of storm surge and breaking waves exacerbated by sea level rise 4. Prevent flood related repetitive losses from natural disaster through education and regulation Objectives: 4.1. Map repetitive and severe repetitive loss (RL) areas 4.2. Identify projects that will mitigate flood risk in these the RL areas 4.3. Track mitigation projects by flood basin to see past, current and future projects and compare to flooding data 5. Promote and support the Community Rating System (CRS) for all communities in Miami-Dade. Objectives: 5.1. Incorporate measures into the LMS to help obtain uniform credit for all CRS communities 5.2. Identify and track projects in the LMS to demonstrate the role of mitigation measures in reducing flood risk 5.3. Provide outreach and educational opportunities 5.4. Develop and implement a Program for Public Information (PPI) 6. Promote mitigation measures for critical facilities Objectives: 6.1. Continue to invite and work with critical facility stakeholders 6.2. Identify and track mitigation measures for existing critical facilities 6.3. Assess alternate facilities as identified in continuity of operations plans to deter- mine if the sites are appropriately mitigated 6.4. Identify additional sites for emergency sheltering 6.5. Integrate sea level rise modeling to project and characterize expected impacts during the expected service-life of critical facilities Protect expressways, major highways and other thoroughfares and, bridges and causeways to provide for continuous, free flowing traffic and circulation as needed for the effective and unencumbered provision of emergency services and evacuation operations 67 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-61 7. Provide whole community planning Objectives: 7.1. Continue to engage additional local community stakeholders to participate in the LMSWG meetings 7.2. Host mitigation workshops to educate stakeholders and community members 7.3. Initiate organizational, managerial and administrative goals to make mitigation a mainstream function of government affairs; spread the responsibilities throughout many departments and agencies to ensure continuity and a full inte- gration of mitigation management functions in the operations of government 7.4. Enhance public information and engagement to increase awareness of hazards and problems and to educate through a widespread program of general infor- mation, media coverage and participatory involvement Mitigation Opportunities Though some may link mitigation with post-disaster initiatives, opportunities to integrate and promote mitigation are available before, during and after development and construc- tion occurs. The following tables list some opportunities both for pre and post disaster. 68 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-62 FIGURE 1: PRE-DISASTER MITIGATION OPPORTUNITIES/PROMOTING MITIGATION Maintenance/Renovation Issues (out of contingency funds ) • Identify projects such as roof replacement /major equipment replacement/landscape replacement • Budget in additional mitigation measures • Determine use of facility (critical/essential function ) • Is this site outside of floodprone areas, climate change risk areas, high wind areas? • Determine if additional hardening measures should be incorporated • Installation/elevation of generators • Elevation of AC units • Redundant systems • Protection of openings • Hazard friendly landscaping • Include additional mitigation measures into estimated budget When a project is complete • Publicize mitigation projects the county has engaged in • Highlight insurance benefits • Provide incentives/maintenance saving back to Division/Department Expedited permitting • Incentive for incorporating mitigation measures can be expedited permitting Pre-Disaster Mitigation Opportunities/Promoting Mitigation Budget Process (5-8 years in advance- general project 2-5 years -specific project) – Division Level (Capital Improvement Funds) Include on Capital Project Justification Form New construction will be built to code – • Determine use of facility (critical/essential function) • Is this site outside of floodprone areas, climate change risk areas, high wind areas? • Determine if additional hardening measures should be incorporated • Freeboard considerations • Installation/elevation of generators • Elevation of AC units • Redundant systems • Protection of openings • Hazard friendly landscaping • Include additional mitigation measures into estimated budget *Check with the insurance company to see if they will provide input on how to reduce the risk and other mitigation opportunities When it goes to bid • Include requirements/incentives for respondents to build in mitigation measures • Offer additional points when mitigation measures incorporated into the bid/proposal 69 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-63 FIGURE 2: POST-DISASTER MITIGATION OPPORTUNITIES Review of Project Worksheets for possible 406 mitigation funding Is there a mitigation project that would protect the damaged element from future events? Possible projects may be: • Adding a culvert for washed out roads • Protecting openings that have been destroyed (not just the windows that have been destroyed but the other windows/doors too) • Not just replace a destroyed generator or A/ C but elevate too • Not just replace landscaping with what was there but with Hazard friendly landscaping • If facility has an essential COOP function, consider building back to higher standards • Double up the vapor barrier • Freeboard considerations • Is there a like building to the damaged facility that was not damaged this time? • Is there anything currently under construction/or due to start that could be included (e.g., elevate road)? See mitigation Matrix for additional opportunities *Check with the file to see if any mitigation has previously been recommended by the insurance company When a project is complete • Publicize mitigation projects the county has engaged in • Highlight insurance benefits • Provide incentives/maintenance saving back to Division /Department Expedited permitting • Incentive for incorporating mitigation measures can be expedited permitting Post -Disaster Mitigation Opportunities Benefits • By increasing 406 projects, it will increase the amount assigned in HMGP money. 70 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-64 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION & VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT9 As was touched upon in the introduction to the LMS, metropolitan Miami-Dade County is a large and diverse place and therefore vulnerable to many hazards. Each of these types of hazard is unique and produces distinct impacts to a community. Miami-Dade County developed a Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) that in- cludes numerous natural, technological, crime/terrorism and public health hazards that Miami-Dade County could experience. The 2015 THIRA was under development during the time of the writing of the 5-year LMS update and the information contained in here is based on the final draft of the THIRA. Each hazard was looked at in terms of a general description, location, extent, previous occurrence and vulnerability in the THIRA. Table 2 provides a listing of all of the hazards profiled in the THIRA, including ones that are not further analyzed for purposes of the LMS. Persons interested in seeing a complete review of all of the hazards listed in Table 2 may request to see the complete THIRA. To determine which natural hazards would be included in the LMS, a review of the anal- yses from the THIRA was conducted. For purposes of this analysis, risk is defined as a relative measure of the probability that a hazard event will occur in comparison to the consequences or impacts of that event. That is, if a hazard event occurs frequently, and has very high consequences, then that hazard is considered to pose a very high risk to the affected communities. In comparison, if a hazard event is not expected to occur fre- quently, and even if it did, the consequences would be minimal, then that hazard is con- sidered to pose a very low risk. The determination to further consider hazards is also based on current available information including modeling that may indicate future risk. Some hazards such as windstorms, in and of themselves have not occurred very often nor had a high impact on the physical environment and mitigation measures that would cover these events include mitigation that is being done for hurricanes and tropical storms. Though we may not currently be considering a hazard for future consideration at this time, with new information, technology or modeling we may include it at a later time. We have identified potential mitigation measures, as able for all of the hazards. The Miami-Dade LMS welcomes our participating agencies to identify mitigation measures for all hazards and not just those that the LMS focuses on. The Community Profile (de- mographics) as developed for the 2015 THIRA is located in Part 4 Appendix I. Though we are vulnerable to many different natural hazards, one of the reasons we spend a lot of time talking about hurricanes and tropical storms and mitigation measures in re- lation to them, is that though they account for only 8% of the actual number of hazard events, they account for 81% of the losses, as illustrated in Figure 1. 9 EMAP 2016 Standard 4.2.1 (1) 71 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-65 FIGURE 3: HAZARD LOSSES FROM 1960-2009 IN FLORIDA 10 FEMA also maintains a website entitled Mitigation Best Practices that can be utilized to search for mitigation projects that other communities have embarked upon by hazard type, state and FEMA Regions. These projects also identify the funding source that may assist local communities in finding funding for like projects. FEMA’s Mitigation Best Prac- tices webpage is: https://www.fema.gov/mitigation-best-practices 10 Source: National Weather Service Miami presentation 2015 72 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-66 TABLE 2: ANALYSIS OF ALL HAZARDS FROM THIRA 11 Hazard Further Considera- tion for LMS Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Mitigation Measures Natural Yes No Animal and Plant Disease X Historically, there have not been any occurrences of ma- jor animal disease in Miami-Dade County. There have been three new plant disease outbreaks in the last 20 years (15% probability in any one year) that have im- pacted the agricultural communities but have not had any impact on the physical environment. In 2015, an outbreak of the Oriental Fruit Fly, one of the world’s most serious exotic fruit flies that threatens agricultural commodities, was detected in Miami-Dade County farm- lands. As a result, 97-square miles of farmland was quar- antined in the Redland area and an eradication program was triggered. A state of agricultural emergency was de- clared in the county by the Florida Commissioner of Ag- riculture, Adam H. Putman on September 15th, 2015. Due to the low occurrence and limited impact, this haz- ard will not be further evaluated for the LMS at this time. • For plant diseases pesticides, separation/distancing, eradication of infected plants • For animal diseases, vaccinations, vector control, mosquito control, eradication of breeding grounds (e.g. standing water), public health education • Drain and Cover campaign materials to address mos- quito abatement http://www.miamidade.gov/mos- quito/index.html Dam/Dike/ Levee Failure X Miami-Dade County does not have any dams or levees on the NFIP maps. There are several water conservation areas that have a berm of about 4 feet around them that are dry most of the year. Historically, there have been no occurrences of dam, dike or levee failures in Miami- Dade County. Modeling performed by Miami-Dade De- partment of Transportation and Public Works shows that there are no populated areas near these locations that could be negatively impacted if the levees were breached. Due to the low occurrence and limited im- pact, this hazard will not be further evaluated for the LMS at this time. • Maintenance of structures • Reduce/minimize construction close to structures, where possible • Fortify structures where risks are identified 11 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Climatic Data Center, Storm Events Database: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormev- ents/ 73 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-67 Hazard Further Considera- tion for LMS Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Mitigation Measures Natural Yes No Drought X Historically, there has been 48 drought events recorded between 1950 and 2017 (71% probability of having a drought in any one year). There has been no reported dollar losses to either physical structures or crops. Alt- hough, on July 15, 2015, USDA designated Miami-Dade County as a primary natural disaster area due to the per- sistent drought conditions between January and July. No definitive dollar amounts of damages has been reported for this incident. This hazard is considered further for the LMS due to the high probability. • Water conservation • Public education and outreach • Regulatory fines • National Drought Mitigation Center http://drought.unl.edu/ • Drought Resources for Miami-Dade http://miami- dade.ifas.ufl.edu/weather_issues/DroughtPrepard- ness.shtml Earthquake X There have been no earthquakes in Miami-Dade County. South Florida does not have any documented fault lines. The USGS shows there is a 0.279% chance of a major earthquake within 50 kilometers of Miami-Dade in the next 50 years. Therefore, this plan will not include a fur- ther evaluation of this hazard at this time. • No Current Recommendations Epidemic/ Pandemic X There have been no instances of an epidemic only affect- ing Miami-Dade County. In 2017, Miami-Dade had 113 confirmed cases of the Zika Virus. Out of the total cases, 1 was locally acquired and 112 were travel related. The Zika virus is a disease spread primarily through the bite of an infected Aedes species mosquito, the same type of mosquito that spreads other viruses like dengue and chikungunya. A coordinated effort between Miami- Dade County Department of Solid Waste Management and the Florida Department of Health in Miami-Dade County is established to set out a strategic plan in re- sponse to the Zika Virus. This would help create a unified message for public education and outreach throughout all County agencies and municipalities. There were no recorded deaths and no impact to the physical environ- ment. Due to the limited impacts to the physical envi- ronment, this hazard will not be considered further for the LMS at this time. • Public education and outreach • Vaccinations • Fortify pharmaceutical supplies • Surveillance, monitoring and reporting mechanisms • Quarantine/Isolation as needed 74 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-68 Hazard Further Considera- tion for LMS Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Mitigation Measures Natural Yes No Erosion X Coastal Erosion is a continuous problem for the Miami- Dade County coastline. They are the county’s natural barrier that can help protect us from the impacts of storm surge and sea level rise. The most severe erosion occurs in relation to hurricanes and tropical storm, from June to November. There are 20.8 miles of beaches in Miami-Dade County at risk for erosion and 500 parcels that sit adjacent to the shoreline that could be at risk, if erosion became severe. In 2017, Hurricane Irma caused some beach erosion throughout Miami-Dade County with the preliminary assessment estimating a loss of about 170,000 cubic yards of sand. This hazard is con- sidered further for the LMS. • Fortify beaches through renourishment • Fortify dunes with vegetation or structural compo- nents • Natural barriers such as mangroves and coral reefs • Limit construction close to coastal areas prone to erosion • Limit re-development after disasters in coastal areas prone to erosion • Implement/enforce building code to fortify struc- tures in coastal areas Extreme Heat X There has been one extreme heat event reported, be- tween 1950 and 2017 (2% chance of occurrence per year). On July 25, 2017, NWS issued a heat advisory for Miami-Dade County due to very warm and humid weather conditions potentially resulting in heat index values between 105 and 110 degrees Fahrenheit. The heat advisory was extended until July 26th. During this event, there were 15 injuries on July 25th in Miami Beach, but no reported damages to property or crops. Due to the efficient air conditioning systems of homes in South Florida, Florida Power and Light said that even with high usage of A/C there is not a surge of demand for power that would cause a concern for power outages. The threshold for the National Weather Service to issue an Excessive Heat Warning is when heat index values are expected to reach 113 degrees Fahrenheit or higher for at least 2 hours, with an 80% chance, or greater, of oc- currence. Due to the low impact this hazard will not be further considered for the LMS at this time. • Public Education and Outreach • Identification, designation and opening of cooling centers for vulnerable populations, as needed. 75 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-69 Hazard Further Considera- tion for LMS Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Mitigation Measures Natural Yes No Flooding X Much of Miami-Dade County is susceptible to localized flooding, particularly during the rainy season that runs from mid-May through mid-October. The mean eleva- tion of Miami-Dade County is relatively flat at 11 feet. The County’s flat terrain causes extensive “ponding” due to the lack of elevation gradients to facilitate “run-off”. Of Miami-Dade’s 1,250,287 acres, 44.62% of that is within the flood plain (557,871 acres). There have been 13 flood events and 30 flash flood events recorded since 1950 (50% chance of flooding occurrence every year). Localized flooding and “ponding” occurs frequently dur- ing the rainy season. Property damages of over $542M and crop damages of over $714M have been recorded from flooding for incidents between 1950 and 2017. This hazard is considered further for the LMS. • Public education and outreach on FEMA Flood Zones, storm surge planning zones and general flood risks. • Education on Flood Insurance • Participation in NFIP and CRS • Drainage projects to address RL and SRL areas • Freeboard requirements for elevation of structures above BFE • Monitoring and coordination for maintenance and mitigation projects along canal areas • Monitoring and maintenance of storm drains • Design for larger storm drains • Swale and open space protection • Participation in the development of FEMA FIRM maps to help identify at risk areas and areas that have been mitigated Hail X There has been 208 hail events reported, between 1950 and 2017 in Miami-Dade County. The only reported damage associated with hail was for about $3K in 2012, but this was more likely due to a tree limb that had fallen on a car during the same event. Due to the low impacts of this hazard it will not be considered further for the LMS at this time. • Alert and notification of public to seek safety inside • No other current recommendations Hurricane/ Tropical Storm X Miami-Dade County has a 16% chance of experiencing impacts of a tropical cyclone in any given year.12 In 2017, Miami-Dade County was impacted by major Hurricane Irma and Tropical Storm Philippe. Due to the high im- pacts, this hazard is further considered for the LMS. • Public education and outreach • Designation of storm surge risk areas • Supportive services (evacuation and sheltering) for at risk populations • Hardened facilities for use as evacuation centers • See also recommendations under winds and floods. Landslides X Due to Miami-Dade’s low average elevation, landslides are not likely to occur. There have been no reported landslides in Miami-Dade. Due to the low probability • No current recommendations 12 https://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-news/top-5-most-vulnerable-us-cities-to-hurricanes-atlantic-tropical-season/48281135 76 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-70 Hazard Further Considera- tion for LMS Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Mitigation Measures Natural Yes No and low risk this hazard is not further considered for the LMS. Lightning X There were 64 reported lightning events in Miami-Dade County between 1950 and 2017 (78% chance of a light- ing event occurring every year). Though the probability is high the recorded impacts of these events is low with the highest single impact being about $80K for an inci- dent in Hialeah Gardens when a lightning struck an apartment building. The lightning strike caused a fire and four apartments suffered significant damage leaving a total of 20 residents displaced. Due to the low impact of this hazard it will not be considered further for the LMS at this time. • Surge protection for electrical, computer and phone systems • Lightning detection and warning devices • Public education and outreach Saltwater Intrusion X Saltwater intrusion is a continuous problem that has been occurring ever since the Everglades were drained to provide dry land for urban development and agricul- ture. Long periods of drought and storm surge inunda- tion are hazards that have been attributed to increases in saltwater intrusion. It poses a threat to the drinking water supply and requires close coordination of local agencies to continuously monitor intrusion, determine appropriate pumping rates and the coordination with South Florida Water Management District for mainte- nance of ground water levels. This hazard is included in the LMS for further consideration. • Continue practices of monitoring levels, gauging pumping levels and determining future impacts and need for deeper wells 77 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-71 Hazard Further Considera- tion for LMS Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Mitigation Measures Natural Yes No Sea Level Rise X Sea level rise is likely to increase coastal flooding during astronomical high tides and storm surge events. Sea level rise will likely impact the ability of the canals and low lying areas to drain standing water after rainfall events and impact the ground water elevation. Gravity based outfalls that lie below sea level have already seen impacts when salt water flows up through the outfall system into the streets of several communities. It is es- timated that the total number of acres within Urban Mi- ami-Dade to be impacted by sea level rise for a 1 foot scenario is 121,378 acres (12%), for 2 foot 150,142 acres (16%) and for the 3 foot scenario it could be 168,896 acres (18%) of the county.13 This hazard is included in the LMS for additional consideration. • Designation of Adaptation Action Areas • Additional modeling/mapping to determine areas at risk • Build with sea level rise considerations to increase fu- ture resiliency as determined by the useful lifespan of a project • Minimize development in future risk areas Severe Storm X A storm is considered severe if it produces a tornado, winds of 50 knots (58 mph) or greater, and/or hail of an inch in diameter or greater. From 1950 through 2017, there have been 473 severe storm related events re- ported in Miami-Dade (averaging about five occurrences per year). Over $209M in damages have been recorded during that time. Due to the high probability and impact, this hazard is further considered in the LMS. • Practices to mitigate against hurricanes are also ap- plicable to severe storms. • Also see recommendations under floods • Review Model Storm analyses and identify mitigation initiatives for the hardest impacted areas • Track heavy rain and subsequent flooding to identify areas for potential mitigation measures 13 Analysis of Vulnerability of Southeast Florida to Sea Level Rise: http://www.southeastfloridaclimatecompact.org/wp-content/up- loads/2014/09/vulnerability-assessment.pdf 78 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-72 Hazard Further Considera- tion for LMS Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Mitigation Measures Natural Yes No Sinkholes X There is no official record of all sinkholes in Miami-Dade. The Florida Geological Survey maintains a database of all “subsidence incidents,” however this only includes events that have been officially reported and includes many events that are not sinkholes. Between 1948 and 2017, only one subsidence incident was reported in Mi- ami-Dade to the Florida Geological Survey. In 1972, a sinkhole measuring three feet by three feet, was rec- orded in Miami-Dade County by the Florida Geological Survey.14 Most of the instances reported are small in ex- tent and have not significantly impacted the built envi- ronment. Within the State of Florida for insurance claims, Miami-Dade County represented 2% of the total claims in 2010. Additional instances of sinkholes claims have been reported through insurance claim reporting data but the magnitude of each respective claim was not made available. Due to the low impact of this hazard it is not considered further for the LMS at this time. • Assessment, hardening and replacement of aging in- frastructure. Space X There have been no space weather events specific to Mi- ami-Dade County that have caused interference with technological components of communication or electri- cal systems. Due to the low probability of this hazard it is not considered further for the LMS at this time. • Identifying redundant or alternate systems in case of outages. • Hardening of CI/KR Tornado X There have been 136 occurrences of tornadoes in Mi- ami-Dade County between 1950 and 2017 (averaging about 2 times a year). Recorded damages from torna- does for property exceeds $202M. Due to the high prob- ability and high impact, this hazard is included in the LMS for further consideration. • Hardening of structures. • Identification of safe rooms and structures. Follow FEMA Safe Room Guidance • Increased public awareness • Signing up for existing alert and notification systems. 14 Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Florida Geological Survey Division Subsidence Incident Reports Map: https://ca.dep.state.fl.us/mapdirect/?focus=fgssinkholes 79 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-73 Hazard Further Considera- tion for LMS Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Mitigation Measures Natural Yes No Tsunami X There have been no tsunamis occurring in Miami-Dade County. The risk of a tsunami striking Florida is consid- ered to be relatively low by the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration. Due to the low proba- bility of this hazard it will not be considered further at this time. • Education for risk can be also tied to coastal commu- nities currently at risk for Storm Surge. Volcano (Ash/Dust) X There are no volcanoes in Miami-Dade County and no recorded impacts to the physical environment from vol- canoes. Due to our distance to any volcanoes there is no projected impact. The biggest concern in relation to an active volcano outside of our area would be volcanic ash that may be carried by trade winds that could limit avia- tion operations or possible compromise the air quality. There are no expected impacts to physical infrastruc- ture. Due to the low probability and low impacts, this hazard will not be considered further for the LMS at this time. • Implementation of Sheltering in Place as identified in the Miami-Dade All Hazards Protective Measures Plan. Wildfires X There have been 13 wildfires recorded between 1950 and 2017 in Miami-Dade County (20% chance of a wild- fire occurring every year). Recorded property damages for wildfires is about $180K. Though historically there has not been a high impact on property, it is estimated that about 613,453 people, or 25% of our area popula- tion, live within the Wildland Urban Interface and could be at risk. This hazard is included for further considera- tion in the LMS. • Prescribed burning programs. • Cutting brush or other fuel away from structures. • Follow National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Firewise Communities Program • Roles in Fire-Adapted Communities http://www.usfa.fema.gov/downloads/pdf/publica- tions/fire_adapted_communities.pdf Windstorms X There were 10 high wind and 2 strong wind events on record from 1950 to 2017 (18% chance of an event oc- curring every year). Recorded property damages total about $18K. Mitigation strategies that address tropical storms and hurricanes would also help protect the built environment from high wind events. Due to the low im- pact of these events, this hazard will not be considered further for the LMS at this time. • Building opening and glazing protection. • Hardening of roof structures. • Securing roof top equipment. 80 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-74 Hazard Further Considera- tion for LMS Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Mitigation Measures Natural Yes No Winter Storm X There have been 27 occurrences of winter storm related events (cold/wind chill, extreme cold, frost/freeze) be- tween 1950 and 2017 (40% chance of an event occurring every year in Miami-Dade County). Though there has not been any recorded property damages, there has been over $300M in crop damages during these events. During these events, a demand for electricity will in- crease and many homes in South Florida do not have ef- ficient heating systems, unlike their air conditioning sys- tems, and therefore the demand on electricity can be much higher. This hazard is included in the LMS for fur- ther consideration. • Identification, designation, construction of cold weather shelters for homeless and other vulnerable populations, and opening of the same during cold weather events. • Public education and outreach • Agriculture Extension works with local growers for educational material for mitigation of crop losses. http://miami-dade.ifas.ufl.edu/weather_is- sues/cold%20preparedness.shtml 81 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-75 The following non-natural hazards are included in the THIRA and we have included suggested mitigation measures, but they are not currently further considered in the LMS. Technological Coastal Oil Spill • Vessel inspections • Compliance with safety regulations Electric Utility Failure • Emergency Generators • Alternate energy sources • Hardened utility lines and structures • Emergency Evacuation and Assistance Program run by the OEM to assist vulnerable populations • Public Outreach and Education Hazardous Materials Release • Regular onsite inspections of hazardous materials facilities • Hardening of facilities with hazardous materials • Emergency shut off valves • Public Outreach and Education • Implementation of All Hazards Protective Measures Plan Nuclear Power Plant Release • Hardened facilities • Public Education, Outreach and Alert and Notification process • Protective Actions to shut down facility • Turkey Point Response Plan and annual exercises Structural Fire • Fire suppression safety systems • Alert and notification systems • Regular Fire Drills and Inspections Transportation Incident (i.e. Highway and/or Rail Incident) • Inspection and maintenance of transportation corridors • Building infrastructure to future risk and capacity needs • Inspection and maintenance of trains, planes, automobiles and vessels Water/Wastewater Incident • Inspection and maintenance of infrastructure • Building infrastructure to future risk and capacity needs Human Caused Hazards Active Shooter • See Something, Say Something campaign • Security screening procedures Civil Disturbance/ Civil Unrest • Intel gathering and sharing • Community gathering points to allow for peaceful demonstrations • Public Outreach and Education • Increased law enforcement presence as a deterrence 82 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-76 Electromagnetic Pulse • Shielding • Backup systems for communications and power • Surge protection Food Borne Illness Incident • Follow Public Health guidelines • Reporting systems Mass Migration • Intel gathering and sharing Terrorism – Biological (Category A, B and C Agents) • Surveillance and reporting • Follow Public Health guidance • Personal Protective Equipment • All Hazards Protective Measures Plan – implementation of Isolation/Quarantine • Public Education and Outreach Terrorism – Chemical • Intel gathering and sharing • See Something, Say Something campaign • Surveillance/monitoring of CI/KR sites Terrorism – Cyber • Intel gathering and sharing • Security procedures and passwords • Firewalls • Tamper proof infrastructure • Surveillance/monitoring of CI/KR sites • Miami-Dade created a Cyber Security Plan (April 2017) Terrorism – Explosive • Protective barriers (bollards, cement barriers, bullet proof glass, metal/chemical detection) Terrorism – Radiological • Surveillance/monitoring of CI/KR sites • Intel gathering and sharing • See Something, Say Something campaign Terrorism – Small Arms • Intel gathering and sharing • See Something, Say Something campaign • Surveillance/monitoring of CI/KR sites • Security screening procedures 83 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-77 Drought Description A drought is characterized as an extended period of time with persistent dry weather conditions in a geographic area that typically has none to minimal precipitation. A drought can however be defined in several different ways depending on the geographical region and situation: • Meteorological drought: When the normal level of precipitation has a significant measurable drop. • Agricultural drought: When the level of soil moisture drops below the suitable range for agricultural growth. • Hydrological drought: When the surface water and underground water supply falls below normal. • Socioeconomic drought: When water shortages seriously interferes with human activity. The Palmer Index, developed by Wayne Palmer in the 1960s, uses temperature and rainfall information to formulate dryness. It has become the semi-official drought index. The index is effective in determining long term drought conditions of several months. The index sets normal conditions at 0 with drought conditions in negative values. The index can also be reversed showing the excess of precipitation where the normal condi- tions at 0 and positive values for amount of rainfall. The advantage of the Palmer Index is that it is standardized to local climate, so it can be applied to any part of the country to demonstrate relative drought or rainfall conditions. TABLE 3: NATIONAL INTEGRATED DROUGHT INFORMATION SYSTEM ALERTS FOR DROUGHTS Alert Criteria Palmer Drought Index D0 Abnormally Dry Going into drought: short-term dryness slowing planting, growth of crops or pastures. Coming out of drought: some lingering water deficits; pastures or crops not fully recovered. -1.0 to -1.9 D1 Moderate Drought Some damage to crops, pastures, streams, reservoirs, or wells low, some water shortages developing or imminent, and voluntary water-use re- strictions requested. -2.0 to -2.9 D2 Severe Drought Crop or pasture losses are likely, water shortages common and water re- strictions imposed. -3.0 to -3.9 D3 Extreme Drought Major crop and pasture losses with widespread water shortages or re- strictions. -4.0 to -4.9 D4 Exceptional Drought Exceptional and widespread crop and pasture loss, shortages of water in reservoirs, streams, and wells creating water emergencies. -5.0 or less Source: U.S. Drought Monitor Classification Scheme, from the United States Drought Monitor 84 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-78 Location The entire County is vulnerable to drought conditions. Extent D4 on the Palmer Drought Scale. Impact The Drought Center reports that the direct impacts of a drought can include reduced crop productivity; increased fire hazards; reduced water levels; increased wildlife mortality rates; damage to wildlife and fish habitat; increased problems with insects and diseases to plants and trees; and reduced growth. Indirect results can lead to financial hardships for farmers and "increased prices for food and timber, unemployment, reduced tax reve- nues because of reduced expenditures, increased crime, foreclosures on bank loans to farmers and businesses, migration, and disaster relief programs." During times of drought, crop irrigation can lower the water table, exposing it to salt water (please see the Salt Water Intrusion section for more information). Water restrictions were put in place for Miami-Dade County that impacted both residential and agricultural communities. No definitive dollar amounts of damages were found during a review of the literature. Previous Occurrences January – September 2015 – A combination of decreased rainfall and higher than nor- mal temperatures through Miami-Dade County resulted in drought conditions throughout the county between January and September. A persistent high-pressure system in the upper levels of the troposphere restricted cold fronts to move southward through South Florida and delivered warm subtropical air to the region during the spring months (March- May). During the summer months (June-August), this high-pressure system brought warm and dry easterly winds steering most of the typical South Florida afternoon thun- derstorms to the west of the peninsula. A three-month deficit of 10-15 inches of rainfall across the County and temperatures between 0.5 and 1.5 degrees Fahrenheit above nor- mal resulted in drought conditions throughout this period. Miami-Dade County had its peak drought condition in late July 2015 when the Palmer Drought Index peaked to ex- treme drought (D3) in the eastern part of the County. As a result of this event, USDA designated Miami-Dade County as a primary natural disaster area due to the damages and losses caused to the agriculture community.15 March – early April, 2012 – Very dry conditions continued into early April over all of Florida. There were no reported damages. Ground water levels led to the continuation of severe drought conditions. January – August 2011 – Rainfall totals in January were near to below normal over most of southeast Florida. This resulted in the expansion of severe drought (D2) conditions over inland sections of Miami-Dade County. Rainfall deficits since October over these areas ranged anywhere from 8 to 11 inches. Most wells across the area were running at around 10 percent of normal water levels. The level of Lake Okeechobee remained 15 https://www.fsa.usda.gov/news-room/emergency-designations/2015/ed_20150715_rel_0089 85 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-79 steady at about 12.5 feet, which is 2.2 feet below normal. The Keetch-Byram Drought Index (KBDI) was in the 500 to 600 range, which reflects a high fire danger and low soil moisture values. February was a very dry month over South Florida as a high pressure dominated the region's weather pattern. Over most of Miami-Dade, February rainfall totals were less than a tenth of an inch. As a result, February 2011 was among the top 10 driest Febru- aries on record at Miami and Miami Beach. This led to severe drought conditions over most of South Florida, with extreme drought conditions over portions of the southeast coast. The level of Lake Okeechobee fell about a half-foot during February, from around 12.5 feet to near 12 feet. Forestry officials reported double the number of wildfires during the winter months of 2010-2011 compared to the previous year. The period of October 2010 to February 2011 was the driest on record in the 80-year history of the South Florida Water Management District's records. Conditions remained dry and by the end of May, most of southern Florida was in an ex- treme (D3) drought status, except for an area of exceptional (D4) drought over eastern Palm Beach and Broward counties. This is the first time in well over a decade that any part of south Florida has been designated as being under exceptional drought conditions. June continued the streak of below normal rainfall over most of South Florida. Little rain fell during the first 10 days of the month, with the rainy season not starting until around June 8th. Almost all the rain across the area fell in the last 2 weeks of the months. Total rainfall were only in the 2 to 4 inch range over the east coast metro areas as well as the Gulf coast areas. Miami Beach recorded its driest June on record with only 1.15 inches of rain. Inland areas of South Florida received about 6 to 8 inches, with isolated 9 to 11 inch amounts south and west of Lake Okeechobee. The level of Lake Okeechobee dropped from around 10 feet at the beginning of June to a minimum of around 9.6 feet in late June before recovering by the end of the month. Wells and underground reservoirs remained at the lowest 10 percent of normal levels. Exceptional (D4) drought conditions extended over most of Palm Beach and Broward counties as well as far northern Miami-Dade County. Extreme (D3) drought conditions extended all the way to the southwest Florida coast of Collier County, with severe (D2) drought conditions elsewhere over South Florida. Several wildfires broke out over South Florida in June, including a large wildfire in the Everglades of Miami-Dade County near the Miccosukee Resort and several wildfires in north-central Palm Beach County and eastern Collier County. July and August brought much needed rains. Overall, rainfall averaged near to above average over most areas, leading to gradually improving drought conditions. Lake Okeechobee remained over 3 feet below the normal level for this time of year. Underground water levels remained below normal over much of South Florida, especially over the metro east coast sections.16 No data was available to determine the economic impacts of this event. 16 Source: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Climatic Data Center, Storm Events Database 86 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-80 Vulnerability Physical Vulnerabilities Drought is not anticipated to have any impact on the built environment (Critical Infrastruc- ture, Key Resources, and Building Stock). It may cause economic losses to agriculture and aquaculture due to loss of crops or water restrictions that inhibit normal operations. Crops most vulnerable to drought are the ones that are grown during the winter months, our dry season, and harvested in the spring months including cantaloupe, carambola, celery, cucumbers, dragon fruit, eggplant, fennel, guava, green beans, herbs, jackfruit, longan, lychee, mushrooms, onions, papaya, passion fruit, plantains, radishes, sapodilla, spinach, squash, strawberries, sweetcorn, thyme, tomatoes and zucchini. Drought con- ditions can also impact the Miami-Dade County Water and Wastewater Treatment sys- tem. Social Vulnerabilities This hazard may impact persons employed by the agricultural community including mi- grant farm workers. In terms of the general population, it does not tend to affect one population over another, however the social vulnerability section should be reviewed for more information on how these types of circumstances may affect populations in Miami- Dade County differently. Erosion Description Erosion is the wearing away of land or the removal of beach or dune sediments by wave action, tidal currents, wave currents, or drainage; the wearing away of land by the action of natural forces; on a beach, the carrying away of beach material by wave action, tidal currents, littoral currents or by deflation. Waves generated by storms cause coastal ero- sion, which may take the form of long-term losses of sediment and rocks, or merely in the temporary redistribution of coastal sediments. Riverine and canal erosion are minimal within Miami-Dade County and will not be further analyzed. Coastal erosion is of greater concern and is expanded upon below. Long-shore currents move water in a direction parallel to the shoreline. Sand is moved parallel to most beaches in Florida by long-shore drift and currents. Ideally the movement of sand functions like a balanced budget. Sand is continually removed by long-shore currents in some areas but it is also continually re- placed by sand carried in by the same type of currents. Structures such as piers or sea walls, jetties, and navigational inlets may interrupt the movement of sand. Sand can be- come “trapped” in one place by these types of structures. The currents will, of course, continue to flow, though depleted of sand trapped elsewhere. With significant amounts of sand trapped in the system, the continuing motion of currents (now deficient in sand) results in erosion. In this way, human construction activities that result in the unnatural trapping of sand have the potential to result in significant coastal erosion. Beach Erosion – Beach erosion occurs when waves and currents remove sand from the beach system. The narrowing of the beach threatens coastal properties and tourism rev- enue in coastal counties throughout the United States. 87 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-81 Dune Erosion – Dune erosion occurs when waves attack the front face of the sand dune, reducing the volume and elevation of the dune. Erosion of the sand dune leaves coastal properties more vulnerable to future storms. Overwash – When waves exceed the elevation of the dune, sand is transported across the island in a process known as overwash. When overwash occurs, it often results in significant damage to coastal property. Inundation and Island Breaching – Inundation occurs when the beach system, or the sandy profile located between the most seaward (primary) dune and the shoreline, is completely submerged under the rising storm surge. Strong currents may carve a chan- nel in the island in a process known as island breaching. Location The coastal areas indicated in the map are at highest risk for coastal erosion. Extent 25,000 cubic yards of sand. Impact Miami-Dade beaches provide storm surge protection and coastal erosion can diminish this natural buffer. Sea turtles can also be im- pacted as their nesting grounds may be impacted and the beaches are a big draw for tourism. Miami- Dade’s shoreline is highly devel- oped with an estimated beachfront value in excess of $13.5 billion, not including infrastructure. Previous Occurrences Coastal erosion has been occur- ring for years, the first study was done in 1930 and a restudy was done in 1961. As a result, from 1975-1982 the USACE implemented the Miami-Dade County Beach Erosion control and Hurricane Surge Protection project that cost about $48 million. It is estimated for every $1 that is invested in beach nourishment that there is a return of about $700 foreign, primarily tourism impacts. USACE completed a $11.5 million project to widen 3,000 feet stretch of Miami Beach’s shore, that was washing away. The shore between 46th and 54th street was expanded by 230 feet to protect the island from storm surge. The project was funded with a combination of federal, state and county dollars and completed on 88 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-82 February 2017.17 In August 2017, USACE awarded $8.6 million for Sunny Isles Beach renourishment project that began in October 2017 and is set to be completed by May 2018.18 September 2017 – Hurricane Irma caused some beach erosion throughout Miami-Dade County. The preliminary damage assessments estimated a loss of 170,000 cubic yards of sand. The money amount in damages has not been determined. October 2016 – Hurricane Matthew caused minor beach erosion, as it travelled north- ward parallel to Florida’s east coast. Miami-Dade County agencies and municipalities estimated close to $1M in damages due to coastal erosion. October 2012 – Hurricane Sandy, never made landfall, but paralleled the coast causing coastal erosion with reports of waves up to 10 feet in Miami-Dade. There was no Presi- dential Declaration for damages within Miami-Dade.19 Hurricane Sandy, was estimated to cause over $2M in damages to beaches including the following: • Miami Beach 26th – 29th Street – approximately 10,000 cubic yards • Miami Beach 44th – 46th Street – approximately 2,500 cubic yards • Miami Beach 53rd – 56th Street – approximately 3,000 cubic yards • Miami Beach 63rd – 66th Street – approximately 5,000 cubic yards • Bal Harbour 99th – 103rd Street – approximately 2,600cubic yards • Key Biscayne – unknown cubic yards estimated at $1.2M 20 October 2005 – Hurricane W ilma, caused in general only minor beach (Condition I) erosion to the majority of beaches in Miami-Dade but dune erosion (Condition II) occurred at the Bill Baggs Cape Florida State Park.21 Picture at right shows damage to Bill Baggs. No major structural damage was observed seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) or within the Coastal Building Zone (CBZ). The majority of the damage near the coast occurred north of Bakers Haulover Inlet. At Cape Florida, a concrete seawall and rock revet- ment sustained level three damage. September 2005 – Hurricane Rita, caused only minor beach erosion (Condition I) north of Government Cut from Miami Beach to Broward County. Virginia Key also had minor beach erosion (Condition I) but also experienced overtopping, resulting in a wash over deposit of sand. Portions of Key Biscayne experience moderate beach and dune erosion 17 A swath of Miami Beach was washing away. The fix? Dump 285,00 tons of sand on it: http://www.mi- amiherald.com/news/local/community/miami-dade/miami-beach/article141141543.html 18 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Jacksonville District) Miami-Dade County Projects: http://www.saj.usace.army.mil/Missions/Civil-Works/Shore-Protection/Dade-County/ 19 Miami-Dade County EOC Activation Archive 20 Miami-Dade Emergency Operations Center Damages Report 21 Florida Department of Environmental Protection Post-Storm Reports 89 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-83 (Condition III) and south of Sonesta Beach Resort had minor dune erosion (Condition II). No structural damages were sustained along the Miami-Dade County coast seaward of the CCCL or within the CBZ during the passage of Hurricane Rita. August 2005 – Hurricane Katrina caused minor beach erosion (Condition I) to the north- ern beaches in Miami-Dade. No structural damages were sustained along the Dade County coast seaward of the CCCL or within the CBZ; however, a number of single-family dwellings were flooded on Key Biscayne forcing their evacuation. Vulnerability Physical Vulnerabilities The entire built environment (Critical Infrastructure, Key Resources, Building Stock) and natural environment (beaches) are vulnerable to erosion primarily along coastal areas. According to a GIS analysis there are approximately 500 parcels in the property appraiser database that intersect with the CCCL. Though the beaches have been fortified over the years and are much wider than they used to be (see pictures), constant erosion could put structures in these areas at risk. The map to the right shows the status of erosion classi- fications for Miami-Dade County’s coastal areas. Severe erosion can exacerbate storm surge inundation by minimizing the protection offered by beaches and seawalls as they are compromised. Structures such as boardwalks or piers that are have pilings in coastal areas may suffer collapse or com- plete destruction. Beaches in Miami-Dade, such as South Beach and Biscayne National Park, are cited as the number one reason tourists come to Miami-Dade, which is esti- mated at about $18.5 Billion annually. There are two piers in Miami-Dade County that extends into the Atlantic Ocean and Government Cut, the Newport Beach Fish- ing Pier in Sunny Isles Beach and the South Pointe Pier in Miami Beach. The Newport Beach Pier was rebuilt and reopened in 2013 after being destroyed by Hurricane Wilma in 2005 and the South Point Pier was rebuilt and reopened in 2014 after being closed in 2004 due to deterioration. Social Vulnerabilities This hazard does not tend to affect one population over another. 90 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-84 Flooding Description Flooding is an overflowing of water onto land that is normally dry. It can happen during heavy rains, when ocean waves come onshore, and when regular drainage capabilities are compromised. Flooding may happen with only a few inches of water, or it may happen with several feet of water. Flooding can affect many different communities covering sev- eral states during a single flooding event. Sunny day flooding and tidal flooding are dis- cussed in the Sea Level Rise section. TABLE 4: COMMON FLOOD TYPES Category Criteria River or Canal Overbank Flooding When water levels rise in a river due to excessive rain from tropical systems making landfall, persistent thunderstorms over the same area for extended periods of time Ponding When water levels rise in a land locked area, lake or detention basin due to excessive rain from tropical systems making landfall, persistent thunderstorms over the same area for extended periods of time. In South Florida, some of the severe localized thunder- storms frequently exceed 3 inches/h, exhausting the storage and infiltration capacity of the drainage system. Coastal Flooding When a hurricane, tropical storm, or tropical depression produces a deadly storm surge that overwhelms coastal areas as it makes landfall. Storm surge is water pushed on shore by the force of the winds swirling around the storm. This advancing surge com- bines with the normal tides to create the hurricane storm tide, which can increase the average water level 15 feet or more. The greatest natural disaster in the United States, in terms of loss of life, was caused by a storm surge and associated coastal flooding from the great Galveston, Texas, hurricane of 1900. At least 8,000 people lost their lives. Inland or Riv- erine Flood- ing When tropical cyclones move inland, they are typically accompanied by torrential rain. If the decaying storm moves slowly over land, it can produce rainfall amounts of 20 to 40 inches over several days. Widespread flash flooding and river flooding can result. In the 1970s, '80s, and '90s, inland flooding was responsible for more than half of the deaths associated with tropical cyclones in the United States. The state of Florida has nearly 121,000 census blocks potentially threatened by riverine flooding, translating to nearly $880 billion in property. Flash Flood- ing A rapid rise of water along a stream or low-lying urban area. Flash flooding occurs within six hours of a significant rain event and is usually caused by intense storms that produce heavy rainfall in a short amount of time. Excessive rainfall that causes rivers and streams to swell rapidly and overflow their banks is frequently associated with hurricanes and tropical storms, large clusters of thunderstorms, supercells, or squall lines. Other types of flash floods can occur from dam or levee failures. 91 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-85 Source: National Weather Service Location Much of Miami-Dade County is susceptible to localized flooding, particularly during the rainy season of June through October, see the map on next page. One area in particular experiences flooding on a regular basis. Known as the 8½ square mile area, it is located west of the L-31N Levee, between SW 104th Street on the north and SW 168th Street on the south. The mean elevation of Miami-Dade County is relatively flat at 11 feet. The county’s flat terrain causes extensive “ponding” due to the lack of elevation gradients to facilitate “run-off”. Of Miami-Dade’s 1,250,287 acres, 44.62% of that is within the flood plain (557,871 acres). Our community is interlaced with an intricate system of canals that play an integral role in our groundwater saturation levels. When the levels are too high or the canal structures cannot be opened, this can lead to localized flooding during rain events. Agricultural interests can be impacted by levels that are too high or too low. If the control structures release the fresh water at a rapid rate this can also lead to environ- mental concerns where the fresh water is released. When the control structures fail or are damaged and can- not be operated, alleviation of any localized flooding may re- quire pumping until the canal structures can be re-opened or fixed. Inability to be able to close the salinity structures within the canals could also increase the risk of salt water intrusion during high tide and storm surge. Part 7 of the LMS provide greater detail as to the canal system within the county and the relation to drainage basins. Extent Two feet of flooding. Impact In 1999 and 2000 Miami- Dade experienced two major flooding incidents, Hurricane Irene and the “No Name Storm”, later known as Tropi- cal Storm Leslie once it en- tered the Atlantic. The dam- ages from the 1999 storm were reported as $100 million in property and $200 million in 92 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-86 crop damages and the 2000 storm caused $440 million in property damage and $500 million in crop damages.22 Though the flooding in this area was not directly attributed to a failure of the canal system, it was acknowledged that the original drainage system for the Tamiami Canal Basin was not designed to accommodate the population that resided in that area and the water managers recognized a need for major system improvements. A $42 million multi-phase project that included a 900-acre emergency detention basin, and the S-25B Forward Pump Station and S-26 Pump Station and dredging project. This project improved flood protection for 500,000 residents and to 5,000 homes and busi- nesses.23 After Hurricane Irene in 1999, areas of Miami-Dade had standing water for long periods of time as is reflected in the following chart.24 Area Estimation of the deepest water Problems Estimated time it took for the water to dissipate East Everglades 2 feet Impassable roads and minimal home intrusion 1 month Sweetwater 2 feet Impassable roads and extensive home intru- sion 1 week West Miami 18 inches Impassable roads and extensive home intru- sion 2 weeks Homestead (near Harris Field) 2 feet Impassable roads and some home intrusion 1 week NW 127 Avenue between Tamiami canal and NW 8th Street 1 foot Impassable roads 2 weeks NW 97 Avenue between 25th Street and 30th Street (Vanderbilt Park) 1-2 feet Severe home intrusion 1 week NW 41 Street west of the Turnpike 2 feet Impassable roads 2 weeks Previous Occurrences August 24-27, 2017 – A tropical wave (Invest 97L) was located near the central Bahamas on August 21st, 2017 and forecast to move northwestward over Florida. Wind shear and dry air hindered further development of this system, but the National Weather Service forecast an excessive rainfall threat for the remainder of the week. Rainfall amounts of 2 to 4 inches, with locally higher amounts possible, were forecast for the region. As a result, a Flood Watch was in effect for Miami-Dade County from August 24th through the 27th. 22 Source: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Climatic Data Center, Storm Events Database 23 South Florida Water Management District Tamiami Canal (C-4) Flood Protection Project, July 2008. June 15, 2012 - 24 Miami-Dade Emergency Operations Center Activation Archives, After Action Report Hurricane Irene 93 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-87 Between August 24th and 26th, rainfall amounts ranged between 1 and 4 inches through the county. Rainfall amounts of up to 4.5 inches were recorded in the northeast portion of the county between August 26th and 28th. The only significant report received by the National Weather Service was of Okeechobee Road flooded in Hialeah and a spotter in the area recorded 6.62 inches of rain in a single afternoon on August 27th. August 1, 2017 – Tropical Storm Emily formed west of Tampa Bay on July 31st, and moved across central Florida, just north of Lake Okeechobee. On August 1st, Tropical Storm Emily was located over the Atlantic and moving away from Florida. Although no direct impacts were reported for Miami-Dade County, a trough extending from the tropical system was over southeastern Florida. A combination of the frontal boundary and day- time heating, a band of thunderstorms developed off the coast and moved west. At around 2 pm, the band became nearly stationary over Miami Beach, Key Biscayne and Downtown Miami. A Flash Flood Warning was issued at 3:47pm until 9:45pm. Later in the afternoon, the same band of thunderstorms redeveloped over The Redland, Kendall, Palmetto Bay and Pinecrest area. Rainfall amounts in these areas ranged between 4 and 6 inches with isolated amounts between 7 and 8 inches. The rainfall rates of 2 to 4 inches an hour lasted 2 to 3 hours, and around the same time as high tide. Significant flooding was reported in Miami Beach and the Brickell area in the City of Mi- ami. Vehicles were stalled in streets with up to 2 feet of water and some streets had to be closed due to deep standing water. In Miami Beach, 1 to 2 feet of water was reported on streets in South Beach including Purdy Ave- nue, West Avenue, Alton Road, Pennsylvania Avenue, Meridian Avenue, Collins Avenue, Washington Avenue and Indian Creek Drive. Water entered business, homes, apartment lobbies and parking garages. In Mary Brickell Village, more than 10 businesses and build- ings had 1 to 4 inches of water inside the struc- tures. The picture to the right, shows the 24- hour rainfall estimates between August 1st and 2nd. June 7, 2017 – An area of low pressure over the Gulf of Mexico, brought tropical moisture across South Florida during the week of June 5th. Widespread showers and thunder- storms, with the potential of heavy rainfall was forecast for the rest of the week. On June 7th, a Flood Watch was issued for Miami-Dade County until 8 pm. Aside from minor flood- ing on roadways, no significant issued were reported. 94 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-88 December 2015 – A series of fronts stalled over southern Florida on December 5th resulting in significant rainfall, through the morning of December 6th, throughout the county. Recorded rainfall amounts during the 24-hour period were similar from past tropical systems. The Miami Executive Airport recorded 9 inches of rain and West Ken- dall reported over 10 inches. The Homestead/Redland area recorded 6 to 8 inches of rain which lead to severe flooding in agricultural land resulting in a significant loss of crops. Initial damage loss estimates are around 1 million dollars with a 70 – 80% loss in crops.25 Miami International Airport recorded, its second wettest December on rec- ord, with 9.75 inches. The Miami Executive Airport in West Kendall and the Redland area recorded 18.43 inches and 15 inches of rainfall, respectively. October 20, 2014 – localized flooding and rainfall amounts of 4 to 7 inches were meas- ured in the south Miami-Dade County communities of Cutler Bay and Palmetto Bay. No additional data was available on this event. June 18, 2013 – Persistent heavy rains from slow moving showers and thunderstorms produced an isolated area of flash flooding near the Falls Shopping Mall in Miami-Dade County during the late afternoon and early evening. Measured rainfall amounts were in the range of 7 to 10 inches in the matter of just a few hours. The first report of flooding was received at 5:10 PM EDT with streets nearly impassable and the Falls Shopping Mall parking lot almost completely under water. Several cars were also reported to have been flooded. Water entered structures in the Village at the Falls Condo development with the Oak Ridge Residential Community also reporting water intrusion into a vehicle which caused a total loss of the car. Estimated damages for this event totaled $5K. June 7-8, 2013 – On June 6th, Tropical Storm Andrea made landfall in northern Florida, but southern Flor- ida received torrential rain from the tail of the storm. A South Florida Water Management District rain gauge recorded 13.15 inches of rain in North Miami Beach at 5:53 PM EDT with storm total at the same gauge by 9 PM EDT recording 13.94 inches. Other rainfall reports received were 11.71 inches at the FIU Biscayne Campus in North Miami Beach and 9.89 inches at North Miami/Keystone Point. Over 50 ve- hicles were reported as being stranded in impassable roads in Aventura and additional roads had similar problems in North Miami and Golden Beach. The picture to the right, shows 72-hour rainfall amounts ending on the morning of June 9th, 2013. April 30, 2013 – A nearly stationary thunderstorm over Coral Gables produced torrential rainfall over a period of about two hours with rainfall estimates in excess of six inches and an unofficial, measured report just west of Coral Gables of 7.56 inches. Law enforcement 25 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Climatic Data Center, Storm Events Data- base: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/eventdetails.jsp?id=605707 95 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-89 reported water was entering garages along Anderson Rd. between Palermo Ave. and Camilo Ave. Water was also reported to be entering businesses along Miracle Mile near Galiano St. A parking lot was flooded along Biltmore Way with water reported to be up to the bottom of car doors. May 22, 2012 - A band of showers and a few thunderstorms produced torrential rainfall over the far western portions of the Miami-Dade County metropolitan area and moved east through the area from Kendall to Doral and Miami Springs. Miami International Air- port recorded 4.40 inches of rainfall between 12:45 and 2 PM EDT. Standing water was reported on numerous streets and several vehicles stalled out in the waters. Other rainfall reports received for this event were 3.64 inches at the National Weather Service Forecast Office on the FIU South Campus and 4.03 inches at Ruben Dario Middle School in Sweet- water. Damage totals for this event are including the event which occurred later in the evening over the same area, estimated at $75K. A second band of numerous showers and a few thunderstorms accompanied with intense rainfall moved through the same area of Miami-Dade County that received very heavy rainfall earlier in the day. The first significant report of flooding with this event was re- ceived at 8:10 PM EDT in Doral by the media stating that the canal running along NW 25th Street near NW 107th Avenue had overflowed its banks and flooded a nearby police department parking lot. Many roads in Doral were under several feet of water, resulting in stalled cars and water entering businesses in warehouse districts. Miami International Airport received an additional three plus inches of rainfall making the total for the calendar day to 9.7 inches which was a record daily amount. This also made it the second wettest day recorded in Miami for the month of May with continuous records back to 1895. Storm total rainfall amounts in the Sweetwater and Doral areas ranged from 8 to 10 inches, with an area of 4 to 7 inches extending from the FIU area to near the Dolphin Mall. October 28-31, 2011 – The greatest impacts of this rain event were felt in Miami Beach. The areas of heav- iest showers and thunderstorms were over Pinecrest, Coral Gables and Coconut Grove and remained over that area for another few hours. This area of rainfall produced anywhere from 6 to 10 inches of rain in only a few hours from Cutler Bay to Coconut Grove, leading to severe street flooding and intrusion of water into doz- ens of homes across this area. Estimates from the South Florida Water Management District indicate that isolated areas in Coconut Grove may have received in excess of 12 inches during this time span. Portions of Miami-Dade County experienced 3-7 inches of rain in a few hours causing significant street flooding. October 9, 2011 – Over 10 inches of rainfall was rec- orded at the West Kendall/Tamiami Airport. The 96 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-90 graphic illustrates the rainfall amounts for a 48- hour period. October 3, 2000 – A low-pressure system known as the “No Name Storm”, later to be- come Tropical Storm Leslie, developed off the west coast of Cuba, and headed toward South Florida (DR-1345). Water managers and weather officials closely tracked the storm, and preemptive measures were taken to start moving water out of the canals. Weather forecasts called for 4-8 inches of rainfall from this storm. During that afternoon and evening, as the system moved northeastward over central Florida, a stationary band of thunderstorms extended through southwest Miami-Dade. This resulted in the accumu- lation of 14 to18 inches of rainfall over a linear area in the center of the county.26 Equally as unfortunate were residents and businesses that experienced a similar result as in Irene. October 1999 – Hurricane Irene (DR-1306) developed and started a path towards South Florida. Initial projections were correct in stating the hurricane would impact the west coast of Florida, and Irene traveled through the state and, on October 15, passed just to the west of Miami-Dade County. Although the hurricane did not pass directly through the county and no exceptionally high winds were experienced, the heavy rainfall associated with this storm did hit Miami-Dade County, and the impacts were severe. Some roads were impassible for weeks, electricity was out in certain areas, and residents and busi- nesses suffered heavy losses. Vulnerability Physical Vulnerabilities The entire built environment (Critical Infrastructure, Key Resources, Building Stock) may be vulnerable to flooding especially in low lying, storm surge planning zones, areas close to canals and structures that were built prior to flood plain regulations. Structures in areas where there has been repetitive losses and no mitigation may also be at a higher risk but past flooding events do not necessarily indicate future flooding problems. Part 7 provides additional analysis of residential structures by date of flood regulations within Miami-Dade County. Below is a chart showing how many structures within each jurisdiction are within FEMA Flood Zones. 26 National Hurricane Center, Tropical Storm Leslie (Subtropical Depression One) (AL162000) 97 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-91 TABLE 5: NUMBER OF BUILDINGS BY JURISDICTION IN FEMA FLOOD ZONES Heavy rainfall events tend to be measured by the amount of rain during a certain duration to give you what would equate to the chances of this type of storm which is typically categorized by terminology such as a 100 year or 500-year storm. To help local communities determine if a rain event is considered significant the following site and chart from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Hydro- meteorological Design Studies Center maintains the Precipitation Frequency Data Server (PFDS) which is a point-and-click interface developed to deliver NOAA Atlas 14 precipi- tation frequency estimates and associated information. To determine the amounts and rates of rain that could create a various internal rain event (e.g. 100 year or 500 year) this website provides local information. Jurisdiction A AE AH D VE X XE Aventura 24,149 52 31 Bal Harbour 738 955 2250 Bay Harbor 2576 Biscayne Park 991 42 42 Coral Gables 2770 1209 58 13209 1466 Cutler Bay 8840 1871 3886 Doral 93 3768 16746 El Portal 6 97 566 92 Florida City 3 2 1097 396 817 Golden Beach 262 98 Hialeah Gardens 133 271 5802 Hialeah 1304 18513 36496 Homestead 222 8824 9098 746 Indian Creek Village 33 4 1 Key Biscayne 7056 Medley 19 251 578 Miami Beach 51049 4381 123 Miami Gardens 12103 9083 8638 Miami Lakes 0 8317 1263 Miami Shores 843 3 19 2470 552 Miami Springs 11 2029 2125 21 Miami 43094 6441 3897 68535 2215 North Bay Village 3872 North Miami Beach 5650 7212 653 North Miami 8190 261 5637 1995 Opa-locka 714 543 1319 1275 Palmetto Bay 4701 41 3590 80 Pinecrest 2168 268 3563 260 South Miami 2 784 3660 Sunny Isles Beach 11351 1 7647 0 Surfside 1560 1878 Sweetwater 1 582 367 Virginia Gardens 122 445 86 West Miami 960 768 Unincorporated 582 44750 105,976 2 28 169059 20053 Total: 585 247,570 152,649 2 4305 381122 42164 98 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-92 http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_map_cont.html?bkmrk=fl Using a location in Miami-Dade County with a 7-foot elevation, the following chart depicts the rainfall amounts per an interval of time that could determine if a significant rain event has occurred. 99 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-93 Social Vulnerabilities People who live in areas prone to flooding and whom may be uninsured or underinsured are at greatest risk. The cost of insurance may be prohibitive and people who live outside of a flood zone may believe they are not at risk. People who rent properties may not be aware of their flood risk as it may not be disclosed by the owner or they may not know the history of the area. Hurricanes and Tropical Storms Description A tropical cyclone is a rotating, organized system of clouds and thunderstorms that de- velop over subtropical or tropical waters with lowered pressure and a closed low-level circulation. These cyclones have a counterclockwise rotation and depending on their maximum sustained winds they are classified as a tropical depression, tropical storm or hurricane. Tropical cyclones that contain all the characteristic previously mentioned and maximum sustained surface winds between 23-38 mph are classified as a tropical de- pression, when it reaches winds between 39-73mph, it is called a tropical storm. Once the maximum sustained winds reach 74 mph, it is then a hurricane. Tropical cyclones that pose a threat to Miami-Dade County usually form during the Atlantic hurricane sea- son that stars on June 1st and goes through November 30th. The term hurricane is used for tropical cyclones in the Northern Hemisphere and east of the International Dateline. Hurricanes are considered one of the most damaging and deadly weather events that occur in the United States, with violent winds, waves reaching heights of 40 feet, torrential rains, flooding and tornadoes. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), there are an average of 11 tropical storms that form over the Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean Sea, and Gulf of Mexico regions each year, and on average 6 of the tropical storms develop into hurricanes. The United States experiences a hurricane strike on land about once every year and a half. The strike zone can potentially extend anywhere from Maine and south to Texas. Hurricanes are further classified according to their wind speeds. Winds The Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale was first developed in the early 1970s to cate- gorize hurricanes by intensity. The scale used to include storm surge projections and central pressure by category of storm, but it was determined that there was not a direct correlation between wind speed, storm surge heights and central pressure. For example, hurricanes with wind fields which are very large in size can produce storm surge heights that are much higher than is average for a given category. Conversely, very compact hurricanes, with strong max- imum sustained winds and a significant 100 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-94 low central pressure can produce surges substantially lower than what was included in the original Saffir-Simspson Scale. Today, the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale is a 1 to 5 categorization based on the hurricane's intensity at the indicated time. The scale provides examples of the type of damage and impacts in the United States associated with winds of the indicated intensity. In general, damage rises by about a factor of four for every category increase. Miami- Dade has experience sustained winds of up 150 mph and storm surge of 16.9 feet at the Burger King International Headquarters during Hurricane Andrew in 1992. Storm Surge From a hurricane, storm surge is often the greatest threat to life and property along the coast. Storm surge is an abnormal rise of water generated by a storm, over and above the predicted astronomical tide. Storm surge is produced when the force of the winds moving around the storm push water towards the shore and this surge can travel several miles inland.27 Predictions for storm surge are made through a variety of means, includ- ing the Sea, Lake and Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH) models. Storm surge inundation is modeled in two zones: the high-velocity zone where wave ac- tion and debris can severely damage structures, and farther inland, where the primary concern is flooding as opposed to structural damage. Storm surge can create flooding that can destroy buildings and carry debris miles inland, into canals and rivers, the inter- costal waterways and out to sea. The water can also pool in low lying areas impeding response and recovery activities. Damages associated with storm surge include but are not limited to: • Extreme flooding in coastal areas • Inundation along rivers and canals • Beach erosion • Undermining of foundations of structures or roadways along the coastline (erosion or scour) • In confined harbors and rivers, severely damaged marinas and boats • Sunken vessels or underwater hazards in navigable waterways 27 Source: National Hurricane Center, Storm Surge Overview 101 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-95 FIGURE 4: FLORIDA HURRICANE IMPACT CHANCES Source: floridahurricane.net Location Hurricanes and tropical storms can impact the entire county. The following two maps show the location for winds and storm surge based model runs by HAZUS and SLOSH. FIGURE 5: 50 YEAR RETURN FOR MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS (LEFT) & POTENTIAL STORM SURGE FOR STORMS MODELED WITHIN THE BISCAYNE BAY BASIN (RIGHT) Extent Category 5 Hurricane with storm surge of 16.9 feet. 102 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-96 Impact Historical observations from types of impacts and damages associated with the winds of hurricanes are included in Table 6. All of these have been experienced in Miami-Dade. TABLE 6: POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF HURRICANES BY CATEGORY OF STORM Potential Impacts by Category of Storm Category 1 Very Dangerous Winds • People, livestock, and pets struck by flying or falling debris could be injured or killed. • Extensive damage to power lines and poles will likely result in power outages that could last a few to several days. • Pre-1994 mobile homes may be damaged or destroyed, especially if they are not anchored properly • Damage to newer mobile homes anchored properly involving the removal of shingle or metal roof coverings, loss of vinyl siding and damage to carports, sunrooms or lanais • Poorly constructed frame homes may have major damage – loss of roof covering, damage to ga- ble ends and removal of porch coverings and awnings • Unprotected windows may be broken by flying debris • Masonry chimneys can be toppled • Well-constructed frame homes could have damage to roof shingles, vinyl siding, soffit panels and gutters. • Failure of aluminum, screened-in, swimming pool enclosures can occur. • Some apartment building and shopping center roof coverings could be partially removed. • Industrial buildings can lose roofing and siding especially from windward corners, rakes, and eaves. • Failures to overhead doors and unprotected windows will be common. • Windows in high-rise buildings can be broken by flying debris. • Occasional damage to commercial signage, fences, and canopies. • Large branches of trees will snap and shallow rooted trees can be toppled. Category 2 Extremely Dangerous Winds • There is a substantial risk of injury or death to people, livestock, and pets due to flying and falling debris. • Near-total power loss is expected with outages that could last from several days to weeks. • Potable water could become scarce as filtration systems begin to fail. • Older (mainly pre-1994 construction) mobile homes have a very high chance of being destroyed and the flying debris generated can shred nearby mobile homes. • Newer mobile homes can also be destroyed. • Poorly constructed frame homes have a high chance of having their roof structures removed es- pecially if they are not anchored properly. • Unprotected windows will have a high probability of being broken by flying debris. • Well-constructed frame homes could sustain major roof and siding damage. • Failure of aluminum, screened-in, swimming pool enclosures will be common. • There will be a substantial percentage of roof and siding damage to apartment buildings and in- dustrial buildings. • Unreinforced masonry walls can collapse. • Windows in high-rise buildings can be broken by flying debris. • Commercial signage, fences, and canopies will be damaged and often destroyed. • Many shallowly rooted trees will be snapped or uprooted and block numerous roads. 103 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-97 Category 3 Devastating Damage • There is a high risk of injury or death to people, livestock, and pets due to flying and falling debris • Electricity and water will be unavailable for several days to a few weeks after the storm passes. • Nearly all older (pre-1994) mobile homes will be destroyed. • Most newer mobile homes will sustain severe damage with potential for complete roof failure and wall collapse. • Poorly constructed frame homes can be destroyed by the removal of the roof and exterior walls. Unprotected windows will be broken by flying debris. • Well-built frame homes can experience major damage involving the removal of roof decking and gable ends. • There will be a high percentage of roof covering and siding damage to apartment buildings and industrial buildings. • Isolated structural damage to wood or steel framing can occur. • Complete failure of older metal buildings is possible, and older unreinforced masonry buildings can collapse. • Most commercial signage, fences, and canopies will be destroyed. • Many trees will be snapped or uprooted. Category 4 Catastrophic Damage • There is a very high risk of injury or death to people, livestock, and pets due to flying and falling debris. • Power outages will last for weeks to possibly months. Long-term water shortages will increase hu- man suffering. • Most of the area will be uninhabitable for weeks or months. • Nearly all older (pre-1994) mobile homes will be destroyed. • A high percentage of newer mobile homes also will be destroyed. • Poorly constructed homes can sustain complete collapse of all walls as well as the loss of the roof structure. • Well-built homes also can sustain severe damage with loss of most of the roof structure and/or some exterior walls. • Extensive damage to roof coverings, windows, and doors will occur. • Large amounts of windborne debris will be lofted into the air. Windborne debris damage will break most unprotected windows and penetrate some protected windows. • There will be a high percentage of structural damage to the top floors of apartment buildings. • Steel frames in older industrial buildings can collapse. • There will be a high percentage of collapse to older unreinforced masonry buildings. • Most windows will be blown out of high-rise buildings. • Nearly all commercial signage, fences, and canopies will be destroyed. • Most trees will be snapped or uprooted and power poles downed. 104 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-98 Category 5 Catastrophic Damage • People, livestock, and pets are at very high risk of injury or death from flying or falling debris, even if indoors in mobile homes or framed homes • Power outages will last for weeks to possibly months. • Long-term water shortages will increase human suffering. • Most of the area will be uninhabitable for weeks or months. • Almost complete destruction of all mobile homes will occur, regardless of age or construction. • A high percentage of frame homes will be destroyed, with total roof failure and wall collapse. • Extensive damage to roof covers, windows, and doors will occur. • Large amounts of windborne debris will be lofted into the air. • Windborne debris damage will occur to nearly all unprotected windows and many protected win- dows. • Significant damage to wood roof commercial buildings will occur due to loss of roof sheathing. • Complete collapse of many older metal buildings can occur. • Most unreinforced masonry walls will fail which can lead to the collapse of the buildings. • A high percentage of industrial buildings and low-rise apartment buildings will be destroyed. • Nearly all windows will be blown out of high-rise buildings resulting in falling glass. • Nearly all commercial signage, fences, and canopies will be destroyed. • Nearly all trees will be snapped or uprooted and power poles downed. Source: National Hurricane Center Previous Occurrences October 2017 – On October 28th, Tropical Depression Eighteen formed 55 miles south of the Isles of Youth, Cuba and at 11am, a Tropical Storm Watch was issued for coastal Miami-Dade. A Flood Watch was in effect as of 11am until 4am October 29th. As the system moved north-northeast over Cuba, it strengthened into Tropical Storm Philippe. The system was poorly organized and remained a weak tropical storm when it made landfall on the southwest coast of Florida. The storm moved quickly across Florida and the Tropical Storm Watch was discontinued at 5am on October 29th. Tropical Storm Philippe dissipated over the western Atlantic later in the evening. The storm produced an EF-0 tornado in the Westchester area that resulted in downed tree limbs and power lines, and minor property damage. Rainfall amounts ranged be- tween 1 and 5 inches throughout the county. Some localized flooding on roadways and minor tree damage was reported throughout Miami-Dade County. September 2017 – On August 30th, Tropical Storm Irma formed over the eastern Atlantic Ocean with maximum sustained winds of 50 mph. As the day progressed, Tropical Storm Irma continued strengthening and was expected to become a hurricane the following day. Irma’s rapid intensification began in the early morning of August 31st, when the maximum sustained winds increased from 70 mph to 115 mph in less than 12 hours. Hurricane Irma, now a category 3 storm, continued its track across the Atlantic Ocean, as it headed towards the Leeward Islands. In the afternoon of September 4th, Miami-Dade County was within the 5-day forecast cone of a major hurricane. Due to the potentially catastrophic hurricane heading to Miami-Dade County, Miami-Dade OEM initiated preparations and activated the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) on September 5th. By the evening, Miami-Dade County was within the 3-day forecast cone. 105 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-99 In the morning of September 5th, less than 300 miles east of the Leeward Islands, Irma became a category 5 hurricane with maximum sustained winds of 175 mph. Catastrophic Hurricane Irma reached its peak strength later that day, with maximum sustained winds of 185 mph. For the next couple of days, Hurricane Irma wreaked havoc in Barbuda, Saint Barthélemy, Saint Martin, Anguilla and the Virgin Islands at its peak intensity caus- ing catastrophic damage. Hurricane Irma continued its course through the Caribbean causing widespread damage in Puerto Rico, Hispaniola, Turks and Caicos, the Bahamas and Cuba. At 11pm on September 7th, Miami-Dade County was under a Hurricane Warn- ing and Storm Surge Warning. On Sunday, September 10th, category 4 Hurricane Irma made its first Florida landfall at Cudjoe Key in the lower Florida Keys at 9:10am. Hurricane Irma continued its northward track and made its second Florida landfall at Marco Island at 3:35pm as a category 3 hurricane. Widespread wind damage, heavy rainfall and storm surge was reported throughout Miami-Dade County. Hurricane and tropical storm force sustained winds were measured throughout the county and resulted in mostly tree damage. Rainfall amounts from September 9th through September 11th were between 5 and 10 inches. Recorded storm surge on Biscayne Bay (from south of Miami to Homestead) was between 4 and 6 feet, and on the east coast was between 2 and 4 feet. Also, an estimated $255 M in agricultural damage was reported in the county. Hurricane Irma was the first hurricane to make landfall in South Florida since Hurricane Wilma in 2005. October 2016 – In the morning of September 28th, 2016, Tropical Storm Matthew formed over the Windward Islands with a high potential of strengthening. Matthew continued a westward track through the Caribbean and strengthening into a hurricane the next day on September 29th. On the forecast track, Hurricane Matthew would move west followed by a northwest turn and a then continue a northward track through western Haiti and eastern Cuba. On the evening of September 30th, Miami-Dade County was within the 5-day fore- cast cone of Category 5 Hurricane Matthew. Two days later, Miami-Dade County was not within the cone, but Miami-Dade OEM continued to be vigilant due to the storm’s track potential to shift west. On Monday, October 3rd, the forecast track took a drastic westward shift putting Miami-Dade County within the 3-day forecast cone of a major hurricane. The following day, Miami-Dade County was under a Tropical Storm Warning. Ultimately, the county was affected by the outside bands of Hurricane Matthew, as it con- tinued its paralleled track along the Florida east coast. Rainfall amounts of up to 1.5 inches were recorded throughout the County. Although, no significant damage was re- ported, Miami-Dade agencies and municipalities estimated $10M for public assistance eligible categories. August 2016 – On August 18th, 2016 a tropical disturbance off the coast of Africa was designated as Invest 99L. Invest 99L continued its track across the Atlantic Ocean and on August 23rd, the system was located east of the Lesser Antilles. At this time, the system was posing a threat for South Florida with a high percent chance of development within the following 5 days. The disturbance was forecasted to mature into a stronger tropical cyclone, but as the system continued its west northwest track through a hostile 106 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-100 atmospheric environment which hindered its development. Ultimately, the disturbance continued its trajectory south of the lower Florida Keys, evading Miami-Dade County. No significant impacts were recorded for Miami-Dade County. Invest 99L eventually de- veloped into Hurricane Hermine and made landfall in the Florida Panhandle on Septem- ber 2nd, 2016. August 2015 – On the evening of August 24th, 2015, an area of low pressure located over the Atlantic Ocean developed into Tropical Storm Erika. The evening of August 25th, the tropical system was forecasted to make landfall in the county as a Category 1 hurri- cane on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale. Miami-Dade County was inside the storm’s track until the morning of August 29th, when the storm was downgraded to a trough of low pressure after its interaction with Hispaniola. Due to the trailing moisture, local heavy rains and gusty winds were forecasted to spread across portions of South Florida for the following days.28 A Flood Watch was in effect and tidal flooding along the Atlantic coast was possible until Monday, August 31st.29 FPL reported about 3,300 cus- tomers without power. Ultimately, no public protective actions were taken and no signifi- cant impacts were reported throughout the county. August 2012 – Tropical Storm Isaac moved across the Florida Keys and Miami-Dade experienced a storm surge measured at 1.3 feet and sustained winds measuring 29 mph at the Miami International Airport. In a 72-hour period portions of the county received between 2-10 inches of rain. Wind damage in southern Florida was minor and mostly limited to downed trees and power lines.30 Approximately 26,000 customers lost power in Miami-Dade. There was no Presidential Declaration for damages within Miami-Dade. Miami-Dade agencies and municipalities estimated $5.5 M for public assistance eligible categories.31 October 2012 – Hurricane Sandy, never made landfall locally, but paralleled the coast causing coastal erosion with reports of waves up to 10 feet in Miami-Dade. There was no Presidential Declaration for damages within Miami-Dade. It was estimated by the Mi- ami-Dade Regulatory and Economic Resources Department that there was approxi- mately $2M in damages from coastal erosion.32 October 2005 – Hurricane Wilma, made landfall in southwestern Florida on October 24th as a Category 3, crossing Florida in less than 5 hours.33 Wilma caused structural damage from hurricane force winds out to the west and southwest. Widespread light to moderate wind damage was sustained throughout the county. In downtown Miami, numerous high- rise office buildings were severely impacted by hurricane force winds. The Miami Metromover was closed due to falling debris from a neighboring high rise building. Power 28 National Hurricane Center, Tropical Storm Erika Advisory Archive (AL052015) 29 Miami-Dade County EOC Activation Archive, Situation Report #1 30 National Hurricane Center, Tropical Cyclone Report Hurricane Isaac (AL092012) 31 Miami-Dade County EOC Activation Archive 32 Miami-Dade County EOC Activation Archive 33 National Hurricane Center, Tropical Cyclone Report Hurricane Wilma 107 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-101 outages occurred county-wide for three weeks due to damaged power lines and utility poles. Power losses to service station fuel pumps caused a major but temporary impact on recovery operations. Wind damage to trees and shrubs (native and ornamental) was extensive throughout the county. Ficus trees and Australian Pines sustained the majority of the tree damage, while palms appeared to fare well. Throughout the Biscayne Bay area there was significant marine damage. Many boats were blown up into bulkheads, docks, and overpasses. Some vessels were freed from their moorings and deposited hundreds of feet from where they were originally docked. The Port of Miami sustained damage to roughly 2,000 feet of bulkheads and a cruise terminal lost a section of its roof. The Sunny Isles Marina dry storage facility collapsed, damaging close to 300 vessels. Numerous docks and pilings throughout the county were severely damaged by the bat- tering of vessels that were moored to them. On the barrier islands, there was sporadic minor to moderate wind damage to ocean front high-rise condominiums, low-rise motels, commercial buildings, and single-family dwellings. The typical wind damages were bro- ken windows, damaged hurricane shutters, and minor roofing losses. August 2005 – Hurricane Katrina, made landfall in Miami-Dade County on August 25th. Katrina caused flooding to about 50 single-family dwellings from a measured 12.25 inches of rain, but no major structural damage was reported in south Miami-Dade. Adjacent Homestead to the south, storm water flooding was also sustained in Florida City. In addi- tion, an overpass under construction in Miami collapsed onto the Dolphin Expressway between 87th and 97th Avenues. Katrina did cause significant tree damage at Cape Flor- ida State Park. August 1992 – Hurricane Andrew, which was reclassified as a Category 5 in 2002, made landfall in Miami-Dade County on August 24th, 1992. Damage was estimated at $25 bil- lion, with 25,524 homes destroyed and 101,241 damaged. 90% of all mobile homes in the southern portion of the county were totally destroyed. The Miami Herald reported $.5 billion losses for boats. The powerful seas extensively damaged offshore structures, in- cluding the artificial reef system.34 The last Presidential Disaster Declarations for Hurricanes in Miami-Dade occurred after Hurricane Wilma in 2005. Wilma impacted Miami-Dade in October 2005 and caused widespread power outages for more than 6 million people in the southern portions of Florida that lasted, in some areas, for weeks. The figures represented below are for overall damages associated with storms including damages that could be attributed to winds, rainfall and storm surge associated with the events. TABLE 7: SOUTH FLORIDA HURRICANES & STORMS 1906-2014 Date Name Category Wind Surge Deaths Damage $ 6/17/1906 Hurricane #2 1 80 Unk 0 Unk 10/18/1906 Hurricane #8 3 120 Unk 164 160,000 10/11/1909 Hurricane #9 2 100 Unk 0 Unk 10/21/1924 Hurricane #7 TS 70 Unk 0 Unk 34 National Hurricane Center, Preliminary Report Hurricane Andrew 108 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-102 9/18/1926 Hurricane #6 4 138 13.2’ 243 1.4 Billion 10/21/1926 Hurricane #10 2 110 Unk 0 Unk 9/17/1928 Hurricane #4 4 132 10-15’ 2,500* 26,000,000 9/28/1929 Hurricane #2 2 100 Unk 0 Unk 9/3/1935 Hurricane #2 5 160 20+ 408 6,000,000 11/4/1935 Hurricane #6 1 75 6’ 19 5,500,000 10/6/1941 Hurricane #5 3 120 8’ 5 700,000 9//16/1945 Hurricane #9 4 138 13.7’ 4 540,000,000 9/22/1948 Hurricane #7 2 98 8’ 0 Unk 10/6/1948 Hurricane #8 2 105 6.2’ 0 5,500,000 8/27/1949 Hurricane #2 4 130 Unk 2 52,000,000 10/18/1950 King 2 105 14’ 3 28,000,000 9/10/1960 Donna 4 136 13’ 50 1.8 Billion 8/27/1964 Cleo 2 105 6’ 3 28,000,000 9/8/1965 Betsy 3 125 9’ 75 6.4 Billion 10/4/1966 Inez 1 85 15.5’ 48 5,000,000 9/3/1979 David 2 98 3-5’ 5 10,000,000 8/24/1992 Andrew 5† 155 16.9’ 48 30 Billion 11/16/1994 Gordon TS 52 3-5’ 0 90,000,000 9/25/98 Georges 2 98 5-6’ 0 12,500,000 11/5/98 Mitch TS 65 3-4’ 0 100,000 10/15/1999 Irene 1 75 3-5’ 4 800,000,000 10/3/2000 To become Leslie TD 35 2-4’ 0 500,000,000 9/3/2004 Frances 1 75 2-4’ 0 33,000,000 9/25/2004 Jeanne TS 50 2-4’ 0 10,400,000 8/25/2005 Katrina 1 80 2-4’ 0 800,000,000 9/18/2005 Rita TS 50 2-3’ 0 12,000,000 10/24/05 Wilma 2 110 5-6’ 0 1.5 billion 08/27/2012 Isaac TS 29 1-2’ 0 Unk 10/26/2012 Sandy 1 60 1-2’ 0 Unk Note: The date listed is the date of landfall in South Florida and the category of storm shown is the highest category that existed when the storm passed over or near Miami-Dade County. † Hurricane Andrew was reclassified from a Cat 4 storm to Cat 5 in 2002 by the National Hurricane Center. Sources: National Weather Service, Miami Forecast Office NOAA National Hurricane Center/Tropical Prediction Center Florida State University Meteorology Department Florida Hurricanes and Tropical Storms (Williams & Duedall) Vulnerability Physical Vulnerabilities The entire built environment (Critical Infrastructure, Key Resources, Building Stock) may be vulnerable to hurricanes and tropical storms due to wind, rain and/or storm surge dam- ages. Structures that do not have impact resistant features or protection that can be installed may be more vulnerable to winds. Homes that were built under older building codes and standards may be more vulnerable to wind damages. Per the HAZUS con- ducted by the State of Florida in November 2014, Miami-Dade has the following physical vulnerabilities. HAZUS estimates that there are 474,701 buildings in the region which have an aggregate total replacement value of $160,576 million (2006 dollars). Table 1 presents the relative distribution of the value with respect to the general occupancies. 109 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-103 TABLE 8: BUILDING EXPOSURE BY OCCUPANCY TYPE Essential Facility Inventory For essential facilities, there are 35 hospitals in the region with a total bed capacity of 12,147 beds. There are 501 schools, 102 fire stations, 100 police stations and 6 emer- gency operation facilities. Mobile/manufactured homes and high rise buildings may also be more vulnerable to wind impacts, a listing of sites below. Coastal areas and areas along canals and rivers, as depicted in the storm surge map, may be more vulnerable to surge. Coastal areas are at greater risk for high velocity surge and erosion. Low lying areas are more vulnerable to flooding if a storm brings significant rainfall. Uprooted trees can cause damages to un- derground and overhead utilities. Hurricanes and tropical storms may also cause flying debris that cause additional damages. These storms can also impact the natural and agricultural resources as well, causing severe coastal erosion and flooding or wind dam- age to agricultural assets. The extent of debris and infrastructure outages and restoration times can complicate and increase response and recovery timelines. Part 7 provides tables that show how many Commercial, Industrial, Residential and Other types of struc- tures are within Storm Surge Planning Zones. TABLE 9: MOBILE HOME PARKS IN MIAMI-DADE COUNTY 35 NAME ADDRESS CITY ZIP CODE PHONE TOTAL UNITS TYPE ALL STAR 36 STREET 3010 NW 36 ST MIAMI-DADE 33142 305-557-1122 53 MHP AMERICANA VIL- LAGE CONDO AS- SOC. MHP 19800 SW 180TH AVE MIAMI-DADE 33187 305-253-6025 525 MHP AQUARIUS MO- BILE HOME PARK 451 SE 8TH ST HOMESTEAD 33030 305-248-9383 190 MHP BISCAYNE BREEZE PARK 11380 BISCAYNE BLVD MIAMI-DADE 33181 786-220-7482 61 MHP BLUE BELLE TRAILER PARK 3586 NW 41ST ST MIAMI-DADE 33142 305-635-1755 150 MHP BOARDWALK MHP 100 NE 6TH AVE HOMESTEAD 33030 305-248-2487 165 MHP 35 Updated: April 2017 110 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-104 NAME ADDRESS CITY ZIP CODE PHONE TOTAL UNITS TYPE CARLEY'S MHP 4111 NW 37TH AVE MIAMI-DADE 33142 305-635-5134 70 MHP COCOWALK ES- TATES 220 NE 12TH AVE HOMESTEAD 33030 305-246-5867 217 MHP COLONIAL ACRES MOBILE HOME PARK 9674 NW 10TH AVE MIAMI-DADE 33150 305-696-6231 296 MHP COURTLY MANOR MOBILE HOME PARK 12401 W OKEECHOBEE RD HIALEAH GARDENS 33018 305-821-1400 525 MHP DIXIE MOBILE COURT 19640 W DIXIE HWY MIAMI-DADE 33180 305-933-4219 47 MHP FLAGAMI PARA- DISE TRAILER PARK 2750 NW SOUTH RIVER DR MIAMI 33125 305-634-1002 100 MHP FLORIDA CITY CAMP SITE & RV PARK 601 NW 3RD AVE FLORIDA CITY 33034 305-248-7889 280 MHP FRONTON TRAILER PARK 3617 NW 36TH ST MIAMI-DADE 33142 57 MHP GABLES TRAILER PARK 825, 935 & 955 SW 44TH AVE MIAMI-DADE 33134 305-903-2000 95 MHP GATEWAY ES- TATES MHP 35250 SW 177TH CT MIAMI-DADE 33034 305-247-8500 222 MHP GATEWAY WEST MHP 35303 SW 180TH AVE MIAMI-DADE 33034 305-246-5867 120 MHP GATOR PARK RV Park 24050 SW 8TH ST MIAMI-DADE 33194 305-559-2255 30 RV GOLD COASTER TRAILER PARK 34850 SW 187TH AVE Homestead 33034 305-248-5462 544 MHP HIALEAH TRAILER PARK 425 E 33RD ST HIALEAH 33013 32 MHP HIBISCUS MOBILE HOME PARK INC 3131 W 16TH AVE HIALEAH 33012 34 MHP HIGHLAND VIL- LAGE MOBILE HOME PARK 13565 NE 21ST AVE NORTH MI- AMI BEACH 33181 500 MHP HOLIDAY ACRES MOBILE HOME PARK INC 1401 W 29TH ST HIALEAH 33012 305-822-4611 84 MHP HOMESTEAD TRAILER PARK 31 SE 2ND RD HOMESTEAD 33030 305-247-4021 50 MHP HOMETOWN UNI- VERSITY LAKES 12850 SW 14TH ST MIAMI-DADE 33184 305-226-4251 1154 MHP HONEY HILL MO- BILE HOME PARK 4955 NW 199TH ST MIAMI-DADE 33055 305-625-9255 438 MHP J. BAR J. 2980 NW 79TH ST MIAMI-DADE 33147 305-691-2432 99 MHP JONES FISHING CAMP TRAILER 14601 NW 185TH ST MIAMI-DADE 33018 954-536-7400 52 MHP LARRY/PENNY THOMPSON 12451 SW 184TH ST MIAMI-DADE 33177 305-232-1049 240 RV LEISURE EAST (PALM GARDENS RV PARK) 28300 SW 147TH AVE MIAMI-DADE 33033 305-247-8915 39 MHP 111 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-105 NAME ADDRESS CITY ZIP CODE PHONE TOTAL UNITS TYPE LIL ABNER MOBILE HOME PARK 11239 NW 4TH TER MIAMI-DADE 33172 305-221-7411 908 MHP LION MIAMI TER- RACE MOBILE HOME PARK 1040 SW 70TH AVE MIAMI-DADE 33144 305-261-0551 92 MHP LITTLE RIVER MO- BILE HOME PARK 215 NW 79TH ST MIAMI-DADE 33150 305-758-8888 76 MHP MEDLEY LAKESIDE RETIREMENT PARK 10601 NW 105TH WAY MEDLEY 33178 305-888-3322 82 MHP MEDLEY MOBILE HOME PARK 8181 NW SOUTH RIVER DR MEDLEY 33166 305-885-7070 206 MHP MIAMI HEIGHTS TRAILER PARK 3520 NW 79TH ST MIAMI-DADE 33147 305-691-2969 127 MHP LION MIAMI TER- RACE MOBILE HOME PARK 1040 SW 70TH AVE MIAMI-DADE 33144 305-261-0551 92 MHP MIAMI-EVER- GLADES KAMPGROUND 20675 SW 162ND AVE MIAMI-DADE 33187 305-233-5300 & 786-293- 2208 200 RV NEW AVOCADO TRAILER PARK 1170 NW 79TH ST MIAMI-DADE 33150 305-262-5755 73 MHP PALM GARDENS MOBILE HOME PARK 28501 SW 152ND AVE MIAMI-DADE 33033 305-247-8915 275 MHP PALM LAKE MO- BILE HOME PARK 7600 NW 27TH AVE MIAMI-DADE 33147 118 MHP PALMETTO TRAILER ESTATES 3205 W 16TH AVE HIALEAH 33012 95 RV PINE ISLE MOBILE HOME PARK 28600 SW 132ND AVE MIAMI-DADE 33033 305-248-0783 282 MHP PRINCETONIAN MOBILE HOME PARK 12900 SW 253rd Ter MIAMI-DADE 33032 (305) 257-3251 191 MHP REDLAND MOBILE HOME PARK 17360 SW 232ND ST MIAMI-DADE 33170 305-247-7707 80 MHP RIVER PARK TRAILER 2260 NW 27TH AVE MIAMI-DADE 33142 305-635-4803 61 MHP RIVIERA MOBILE HOME PARK 19900 NW 37TH AVE MIAMI GAR- DENS 33055 305-624-5888 162 MHP ROVELL TRAILER PARK 939 NW 81ST ST MIAMI-DADE 33150 138 MHP ROYAL COUNTRY MOBILE HOME PARK 5555 NW 202ND TER MIAMI-DADE 33055 305-621-2270 864 MHP ROYAL DUKE 3620 NW 30TH AVE MIAMI-DADE 33142 99 MHP SHADY OAK TRAILER PARK 14701 NE 6TH AVE MIAMI-DADE 33161 954-922-8803 25 MHP SILVER COURT TRAILER PARK 3170 SW 8TH ST MIAMI 33135 305-266-1727 236 MHP SILVER PALM MO- BILE HOME PARK 17350 SW 232ND ST MIAMI-DADE 33170 954-665-9050 100 MHP SIX AVENUE TRAILER PARK 14752 NE 6TH AVE MIAMI-DADE 33161 14 MHP 112 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-106 NAME ADDRESS CITY ZIP CODE PHONE TOTAL UNITS TYPE SOUTHERN COM- FORT R V RESORT LLC 345 E PALM DR FLORIDA CITY 33034 305-248-6909 125 RV STRAWBERRY VIL- LAGE TRAILER PARK 1451 W 29TH ST HIALEAH 33012 39 MHP SUNNY GARDENS TRAILER PARK 2901 W 16TH AVE HIALEAH 33012 305-822-5921 93 MHP SUNNYLAND TRAILER PARK 129 NW 79TH ST MIAMI-DADE 33150 786-505-5239 105 MHP SUNNYSIDE MO- TEL & TRAILER PK INC 6024 SW 8TH ST WEST MIAMI 33144 305-266-1727 21 MHP TRINIDAD COURT 7930 NW MIAMI CT MIAMI-DADE 33150 786-505-5239 173 MHP TROPICAL VILLAGE 1398 NW 79TH ST MIAMI-DADE 33147 305-696-0059 108 MHP Hometown UNI- VERSITY LAKES 12850 SW 14TH ST MIAMI-DADE 33184 305-226-4251 1153 MHP WESTHAVEN TRAILER PARK 6020 SW 8TH ST WEST MIAMI 33144 305-266-0488 105 MHP WESTLAND MO- BILE HOME PARK 1175 NW 79TH ST MIAMI-DADE 33150 114 MHP WYNKEN BLYNKEN & NOD MOBILE HOME PARK 2775 W OKEECHOBEE RD HIALEAH 33010 305-887-6570 178 MHP Social Vulnerabilities Mobile/manufactured home residents, electric dependent, functional needs and persons who may not have adequate resources to protect their homes or access to evacuation resources are at greatest risk for this hazard. Visitors and persons who are new to this area may also be more vulnerable as they may not be familiar with what to do in case an evacuation order is given. Prolonged power outages and gas shortages cause additional challenges to businesses and service providers and can disproportionately impact per- sons whom rely upon regular home services such as medical services or food delivery. 113 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-107 Saltwater Intrusion Description According to the United States Geological Survey (USGS), saltwater intrusion is a ge- neric term referring to an influx of saltwater through various pathways into an aquifer. The South Florida Water Management Dis- trict defines it as chloride concentrations exceeding drinking water standards of 250 mg/1.36 Saltwater Intrusion is a major threat to the freshwater resources of the coastal areas in southeastern Florida. There are three primary mechanisms by which saltwater contaminates the freshwa- ter reservoir in the unconfined, surficial aq- uifers of the region: (1) encroachment of saltwater from the ocean along the base of the aquifer; (2) infiltration of saltwater from coastal saltwater mangrove marshes: and (3) the flow of saltwater inland through ca- nals where it leaked into the aquifer. Per the USGS paper referenced below, “Saltwater intrusion of the Biscayne aquifer began when the Everglades were drained to provide dry land for urban development and agriculture.” Location This map from a 2014 publication by USGS shows the areas of Miami-Dade that are experiencing saltwater intrusion. Extent USGS and Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department actively monitor saltwater intru- sion. As of 2011, approximately 1,200 square kilometers of the mainland part of the Bis- cayne Aquifer were intruded by saltwater.37 The map on the next page shows future salt water intrusion impacted by projected sea level rise for year 2040, with projected pumpage rates for year 2030. The red line indicates the expected minimal change to the salt front. 36 Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department, 20-year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (2014-2033), Support Data, November 2014 http://www.miamidade.gov/water/library/20-year-water-supply-facilities- work-plan.pdf 37 USGS, Origins and Delineation of Saltwater Intrusion in the Biscayne Aquifer and Changes in the Dis- tribution of Saltwater in Miami-Dade County, Florida. Scientific Investigations Report 2014-5025 114 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-108 Impact There is concern that saltwater intrusion can threaten the coastal drinking water supply well fields. Shallow-water marine organisms are very sensitive to environmental changes in sa- linity, temperature, nutrient input, and dis- solved oxygen. Temporal and spatial salinity patterns in Biscayne Bay have profoundly af- fected the marine ecosystem caused by water- management driven changes in surface and ground-water discharge. In addition to those changes caused by natural events, long-term change in land and water uses during the 20th century in the bay watershed contributed greatly to the deterioration of marine condi- tions. Water quality has been greatly degraded by increased nutrient loads, trace metals, and other pollutants.38 An increase in mangrove areas and reduction in sawgrass habitat have been recorded in the Everglades. Less salt- tolerant plants like sawgrass, spike rush and tropical hardwood hammocks are retreating as salt-loving mangroves expand.39 Previous Occurrences Saltwater intrusion has been monitored by the USGS since 1939. Per the USGS “in 1904 (prior to any human-induced drainage), the saltwater interface was estimated to be at or near the coast because of the very high-water levels which occurred naturally in the Everglades. Freshwater was reported to seep from the Biscayne aquifer offshore into Biscayne Bay in sufficient quantities to be used as a supply of freshwater for ships. Beginning in 1909 with the extension of the Miami River and continuing through the 1930's, construction of drainage canals (with no control struc- tures) and pumpage from coastal well fields resulted in the lowering of water levels in the Biscayne aquifer, thereby inducing the inland movement of saltwater into the aquifer. Ad- ditionally, seawater driven by tides flowed inland in the drainage canals, resulting in the seepage of saltwater into the Biscayne aquifer from the canals. By 1946, salinity-control structures had been installed in all primary canals as far seaward as possible. These controls prevented saltwater driven by tidal changes from moving upstream in the canals beyond the controls. The controls also served to backup freshwater which maintained 38 http://sofia.usgs.gov/publications/circular/1275/changebb.html 39 http://www.miami.edu/index.php/features/rising_sea_levels_threaten_everglades_freshwater_plants/ 115 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-109 higher water levels in the Biscayne aquifer near the coastline. These water levels are higher than those that occurred during the period of uncontrolled drainage. The inland migration of saltwater in northern Miami-Dade County slowed or reversed in some areas as a result of the effects of these controls on water levels. In the early 1960's, the existing canal system in southern Miami-Dade County was ex- panded to provide for flood control. The canals were equipped with flow-regulation struc- tures both near the coast and inland, allowing water levels to be stepped down from struc- ture to structure to prevent excessive drainage. However, the design and operation of this system lowered freshwater levels in the Biscayne aquifer, especially near the coast, allowing for the inland movement of saltwater during the drought years of 1970 and 1971. In 1976, additional water was routed to southern Miami-Dade County, raising water levels along the coast and slowing or reversing the inland movement of the saltwater interface.40 Since 1984, additional events have occurred which have affected water levels in the Bis- cayne aquifer and, hence, the movement of the saltwater interface. Among these events are the initial operation of the Northwest Well Field and a consequent reduction in pump- ing from the Hialeah-Miami Springs Well Field, expansion of the Southwest Well Field, and changes in the delivery schedule of water to southern Dade County and Everglades National Park. Future changes in water levels might occur as a result of changes in the management of the ecosystem of south Florida. These changes will be based on the results of studies being conducted as part of the U.S. Geological Survey South Florida Ecosystem Program and other studies.41 Per the USGS paper referenced below, “some saltwater likely leaked from canals prior to the installation of water control structures. Near the Miami Canal northwest of the water control structure S-26, this saltwater is gradually mixing with the groundwater and salinity is gradually decreasing. Modern leakage of saltwater likely is occurring along the Card Sound Road canal and upstream of salinity control structures in the Biscayne, Black Creek and Snapper Creek Canals. Saltwater also may have leaked from the Princeton Canal and the canal adjacent to well G-3698, although this leakage could not be con- firmed or refuted with available information.” 40 http://fl.water.usgs.gov/Miami/online_reports/wri964285/index.html#Klein 41 http://fl.water.usgs.gov/Miami/online_reports/wri964285 116 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-110 Vulnerability Physical Vulnerabilities The SFWMD has identified “Utilities at Risk” for salt water intrusion, which in- clude utilities with well fields near the salt- water/freshwater interface that do not have an inland well field, have not devel- oped adequate alternative sources of wa- ter, and have limited ability to meet user needs through interconnects with other utilities; and “Utilities of Concern”, which include utilities having well fields near the saltwater/freshwater interface, the ability to shift pumpages to an inland well field, or an alternative source that is not im- pacted by the drought (SFWMD, 2007). Miami-Dade WASD well fields included as “Utility at Risk” are South Miami-Dade Well fields (Newton, Elevated Tank, Na- ranja, Leisure City, Roberta Hunter Park and Caribbean Park). MDWASD Utilities of Concern include the North and Central Miami-Dade Well fields (Hialeah-Preston and Alexander Orr). Well fields are at risk and as such protec- tion areas have been delineated and are monitored. Saltwater intrusion can impact the rates at which groundwater is pumped to supply drinking water supplies and also may require deeper wells to be drilled. Agricul- tural crops may be impacted by the salinity levels. Saltwater intrusion can also displace the fresh groundwater thereby impacting the water-table elevations in urban areas lev- els that could increase localized flooding. Social Vulnerabilities This hazard does not tend to affect one population over another. Sea Level Rise Description Sea Level Rise refers to the increase currently observed in the average Global Sea Level Trend, which is primarily attributed to changes in ocean volume due to two factors: ice melt and thermal expansion. Melting of glaciers and continental ice masses, such as the Greenland ice sheet, which are linked to changes in atmospheric temperature, can con- tribute significant amounts of freshwater input to the Earth's oceans. Additionally, a steady increase in global atmospheric temperature creates an expansion of saline sea 117 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-111 water (i.e., salt water) molecules (called thermal expansion), thereby increasing ocean volume. Sea level rise is occurring due to three main factors, all of which are occurring due to global climate change: • Thermal Expansion: As with all water, when the ocean heats up, it expands. About 50% of the sea level rise in the past 100 years is because the ocean is warmer, and therefore takes up more space. • Glacier and Polar Ice Cap Melting: Although glaciers and polar ice caps naturally melt a little each summer, they usually regain lost area during the winter. How- ever, warmer winters have meant less opportunity to regrow this ice, resulting in more melted water remaining in the oceans, contributing to sea level rise. • Greenland and West Antarctic Ice Loss: Similar to what is happening with glaciers and the polar ice cap, the huge ice sheets that cover Greenland and Antarctica are melting. Location Mapping developed for the Southeast Florida Climate Change Compact (the Compact) illustrates potential areas of Miami-Dade County that may be impacted by sea level rise. Extent Based on the Compact’s sea level rise projection a one foot scenario could occur between 2040-2070, the two-foot scenario from 2060-2115 and the three-foot scenario from 2075- 2150. 118 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-112 Impact Sea level rise is likely to in- crease coastal flooding dur- ing high tides and storm surge events. Sea level rise will likely impact the ability of the canals in low lying areas to drain standing water after rainfall events and impact the ground water elevation. Gravity based outfalls that lie below sea level will be im- pacted by allowing salt water to flow up through the outfall system into the streets. Many communities in Miami- Dade County are experienc- ing the effects of sea level rise during king tides events. The king tide is the highest predicted high tide of the year, it is above the highest water level reached at high tide on an average day.42 In the future, the water level seen during king tide events will be the water level during daily high tides. King tides can occur once or twice a year. In terms of the amount of land which may be vulnerable, the number of acres impacted in Miami-Dade is three times greater than that experienced in Monroe County for the two and three-foot scenarios. Nearly 80% of the lands affected regionally in the one foot scenario are conservation lands especially coastal wetlands. Low lying natural systems made up of buttonwood, mangrove, scrub mangrove, and herbaceous coastal saline and freshwater wetlands are significantly impacted in all sea level rise scenarios. In terms of the critical infrastructure reviewed, inundation is often confined to marginal areas of the properties or impacting existing drainage infrastructure on site. This is generally true for the region’s ports, airports, schools, landfills and hospitals. Within Miami-Dade these are mainly impacted at the 3-foot scenario. Power plants properties in Miami-Dade and Broward, as well as energy transmission facilities in Monroe are vulnerable at the one foot scenario. While railroads are negligibly at risk, more than 81 miles of roadway from 42 http://www.epa.gov/cre/king-tides-and-climate-change 119 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-113 Miami-Dade through Palm Beach are at elevations below sea level at the one foot sce- nario, increasing to more than 893 miles at the three-foot scenario.43 Upper estimates of taxable property values vulnerable across the region is greater than $4 billion with values rising to over $31 billion at the 3-foot scenario. The following table is taken from the Compact and illustrates Land Use and Property Values in Miami-Dade County vulnerable to Impacts from Sea Level Rise at 1, 2 and 3 feet scenarios. Acres of Future Land Use Top Three Catego- ries Impacted 1 Foot Conservation 107,988 acres Electrical Generation 5,332 acres Agricultural 2,994 acres 2 Foot Conservation 126,809 acres Electrical Generation 5,999 acres Agricultural 7,746 acres 3 Foot Conservation 133,088 acres Electrical Generation 7,000 acres Agricultural 10,890 The Compact estimated that the total number of acres within urban Miami-Dade to be impacted by sea level rise for a 1 foot scenario is 121,378 acres (12%), for 2-foot 150,142 acres (16%) and for the 3 foot scenario it could be 168,896 acres (18%) of the county. Previous Occurrences 2017 – The October kind tides coincided with heavy rainfall and a strong easterly wind, which enhanced the effects of the event. This triggered a Coastal Flood Advisory from October 2nd through the 9th. Through this period, the Virginia Key tide gauge recorded high tides between 0.5 to 1.4 feet above predicted. Areas throughout Miami Beach and City of Miami flooded and reports of stalled vehicles and water entering businesses were recorded. The highest tide recorded for this event was 4.3 feet on October 5th. Another round of king tides happened during the weekend of November 3rd, but there were no significant reports. The high tides recorded were below 0.3 feet and no Coastal Flood Advisory was issued. 2016 – Communities in Miami-Dade County were affected by the king tides on October and November. In October, increased swells due to Hurricane Nicole (located off the coast from Florida) and a full moon on October 16th enhanced the effects of this king tide event. Miami-Dade County was under a Coastal Flood Advisory from October 14th through the 18th. Throughout this period, as recorded by the Virginia Key tide gauge, the high tides were between 0.8 to 1.2 feet above predicted. The November king tides coincided with the Supermoon. On November 14th, for the first time in over 65 years, the full moon was at its closest distance from Earth. Miami-Dade 43 http://www.southeastfloridaclimatecompact.org//wp-content/uploads/2014/09/vulnerability-assess- ment.pdf 120 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-114 County was under a Coastal Flood Advisory from November 13th through the 16th. Throughout this period, as recorded by the Virginia Key tide gauge, the high tides were between 0.7 to 0.9 feet above predicted. 2015 – Communities along the coast of Miami-Dade were affected by the king tides on September and October. The king tides that occurred on September 27th – 28th coincided with the annual Supermoon, when the moon is closest to Earth, resulting in higher than predicted tides. South Florida was under a Coastal Flood Advisory until the 28th. Areas of Miami Beach had ankle-deep water and lead to the closure of Indian Creek Drive be- tween 40th and 29th street several times.44 A Coastal Flood Advisory was in effect for Miami-Dade County from October 27th – 28th. Throughout this period, the tides were between 0.7 to 1.0 feet above the predicted. 2013 – There were also some minor street flooding (to the curb level) from astronomical high tides that occurred April 26-27, 2013, October 17-20, 2013 and December 3 2013 in the same South Beach areas. 2012 – On October 29, 2012 Key Biscayne issued a high tide alert to residents regarding water flowing out of the drainage system that was causing flooding on local stress and adja- cent areas, especially in low lying areas.45 There was also an extended period from November 21-27, 2012 with some street flooding in the South Beach areas of Miami Beach (Al- ton Road area south of 17th Street). Astronomical high tides have in recent years caused local- ized flooding with salt water being pushed back up through storm drain outfalls that use gravity to function. According to the National Weather Service Miami, the greatest impacts for astronomical high tides were in combination with Super- storm Sandy from October 27-30, 2012. Certain areas of Miami Beach can flood when the tide reaches an elevation of 0.5 feet, typical high tide in Miami Beach reach about 0.3 feet, but in October and November 2012 levels reached as high as 2.2 feet. Sea Level Rise is an emerging and future threat and with high tides occurring about two times a year (April and No- vember) as sea levels rise more communities could be at risk from seasonal high tides as well as general sea level rise. The pictures to the right are in Miami Beach during the 2015 King Tide event. 44 http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/miami-dade/miami-beach/article36784707.html 45 http://keybiscayne.fl.gov/index.php?src=news&refno=339&category=News 121 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-115 Vulnerability Physical Vulnerabilities The built environment (Critical Infrastructure, Key Resources, and Building Stock) and natural environment are vulnerable to sea level rise and though some preliminary map- ping shows southern portions of the county at highest risk there is risk to other portions as well. Coastal communities, such as Miami Beach, have already begun to experience sunny day flooding in relation to high and king tides that limit the gravitational drainage that drains to the bay. Additional mapping is being done to determine all areas that may be at risk. The following information is excerpted from the Southeast Florida Climate Compact. Ana lysis of Physical Features Ports and Airports One area determined by the group to be critical is Homestead Air Reserve Base. The County has already met with planners developing the long-term use of the base and pro- vided input on sea level rise. Opa Locka West is vulnerable, but this airport is only a landing strip used for training and so is not considered critical. Below are tables that rep- resent the area that may be below mean high-high water sea level with a 1-, 2-, or 3-foot sea level rise. 122 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-116 123 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-117 124 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-118 Power plants Miami-Dade County has one nuclear power and one coal generation power plant. The generation facilities are not directly impacted. This data below includes impact to the Tur- key Point Nuclear Power Plant cooling canals, the coastal wetlands at the Cutler Plant, and some scattered power transfer stations throughout western Miami-Dade County. Railroads Railroads did not seem to be particularly affected, perhaps due to the fact that most of the rail beds in Miami-Dade County are elevated above the road and surrounding surfaces. The impact reported is limited to FEC Railroad in the northeast coast of Miami-Dade County and to the portion of the CSX railroad serving the rockmine lakes along NW 12 ST in the western portion of the County. This data is reported in miles. Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants Miami-Dade has three major water and three major wastewater treatment plants within the County boundary. The analysis was performed by land use category as provided by the Department of Planning and Zoning. The results, therefore, do not include the names of the facilities, only the area possibly or more likely affect ed by the inundation scenario. A more specific analysis is needed to determine if any equipment would be affected or not. 125 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-119 Landfills Inundation for all levels of sea level rise were primarily in retention or natural areas sur- rounding landfills since the landfills themselves are elevated (see graphic on next page). The South Dade Landfill, Munisport, and Dade Recycling are surrounded by low lying ar- eas. Hospitals No hospitals in Unincorporated Miami-Dade County were impacted. Of the 34 total hos- pitals within the county boundaries, only three hospitals were affected in municipalities in the 3-foot sea level rise scenario. • Selected Specialty Hospital, 955 NW 3rd ST, City of Miami, 33128 • Mount Sinai Medical Center, 4300 Alton Road, City of Miami Beach, 33140 • South Beach Community Hospital 46, 630 Alton Road, City of Miami Beach, 33139 Schools No schools in Unincorporated Miami-Dade County were impacted. Only three of the 867 schools were affected in municipalities in the 3-foot sea level rise scenario. However, we need more specific survey information on all affected schools, such as elevation certifi- cates and topographic survey to determine if those would be actually impacted. • Student Services & Attendance, 489 East Drive, Miami Springs 33166 • School Board Administrative – Annex, 1500 Biscayne Boulevard, Miami 33132 • Biscayne Elementary, 800 77th Street, Miami Beach 33141 Emergency Shelters None of the 69 emergency shelters in Miami-Dade County were impacted. However, more specific survey information and finished floor elevation certificates on all shelters are needed to determine actual impacts. 46 This facility is no longer a hospital, it is now the Miami Beach Community Health Center. 126 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-120 Evacuation Routes Miami-Dade determined there are at most four miles of impact to all evacuation routes even at the 3 -foot inundation because these routes are built at elevations to provide ser- vice in a 100-year storm. US1 Overseas Highway to the Florida Keys and the Ricken- backer Causeway to Key Biscayne have been improved in the past two years. Therefore, the 4 miles of impact are probably an over estimation. The concern for the evacuation routes is flooding of the local access roads leading to them. This information is summa- rized in the section Roads by FDOT Category. 127 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-121 Marinas Marine facilities were analyzed using land use category maps provided by the Department of Planning and Zoning. Marine complexes and marine commercial land uses were com- bined. All marina facilities are located on or next to water features, east of all salinity control structures to give easy access to the ocean. The assumption is that all will be affected in some way, although the extent is only estimated by this current analysis. It is assumed that those docks with fixed infrastructure will be inundated while floating docks will rise with sea levels. Results of Analysis Geographic analysis was done based on the following criteria: • Miles of road by Florida Department of Transportation category • Future Land Use • Habitat/Land Use Land Cover 128 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-122 Taxable Value of Property Miami-Dade County has chosen not to estimate the taxable value of potentially impacted property until such time as the mapping and analytical methods are more robust. Miami- Dade, through the Stormwater Master Planning Process, has determined that the current assessment tools probably underestimate potential impacts. Roads by FDOT Category Roadways are summarized by Functional Class in miles. High volume categories include sections of roadway where bridges were removed from the LiDAR data and represented bare earth rather than the actual roadways. Social Vulnerabilities This hazard does not tend to affect one population over another. 129 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-123 Severe Storm Description A thunderstorm is a meteorological event generated by atmospheric imbalance and tur- bulence caused by unstable warm air that rises rapidly, heavy moisture, and upward lift of air currents that can bring a combination of heavy rains, strong winds, hail, thunder, lightning, and tornadoes. A thunderstorm does not have the same characteristics as a “severe” thunderstorm. The National Weather Service classifies a severe storm as a thunderstorm that is capable of producing 1 inch or larger hail, wind gusts greater than 58 mph and/or a tornado. Alt- hough lightning and/or excessive rainfall may occur during a severe thunderstorm and have severe consequences, these are not considered primary elements of a severe thun- derstorm. Severe thunderstorms, flood threats and lightning are handled through differ- ence sets of warnings and watches by the National Weather Service. The Southern Florida Rainy season is defined as the time of year when most of the yearly rainfall occurs. The rainy season in South Florida begins in mid-May and ends in mid- October. During this nearly five-month period, South Florida receives about 70% of the rainfall for the entire year. The rainy season usually has three phases: • Late May through early July (“stormiest” part of the season). • Early July through mid-August (hotter with dry periods) • Late August through mid-October (higher rainfall variability due to potential tropi- cal systems and early-fall cold fronts) Location The entire County is vulnerable to severe storms. Extent Winds of up to 100 mph, F3 tornado and 4-inch hail during a severe storm. Impact In February 1995, a severe storm caused $5 million in damages. A twisting downdraft damaged four commercial jets, several loading platforms, and a catering truck at con- course G at Miami International Airport. It is estimated that the winds at the site were 100 mph.47 Previous Occurrences January 23rd, 2017 – A strong squall line ahead of a cold front produced a tornado near the Palmetto Expressway and NW 48th Street at 3:45am. The tornado continued a north- east track and moved over Miami Springs and the City of Hialeah producing between EF- 0 and EF-1 damage. Damage consisted of an overturned tractor trailer, about 24 empty 47 National Climatic Data Center, Storm Events Database 130 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-124 cargo containers were moved, downed trees and power lines, and damage on roofs. No injuries or fatalities were reported, but 13 families were displaced in Hialeah and required assistance by the American Red Cross. February 16, 2016 – On February 15th, a strong squall line developed ahead of a cold front over the Gulf of Mexico and as it moved over the warm waters, it intensified. An unstable environment and strong low level rotation was in place over South Florida ahead of the line. In the overnight hours of February 16th, another squall line developed ahead of the first line. Both of these lines merged over southeast Florida before daybreak. As the squall line moved across Florida, it produced a number of severe thunderstorms throughout. A total of 6 tornadoes were confirmed across southern Florida, including an EF-0 in Northeast Miami-Dade. No injuries or fatalities were reported. June 20, 2014 – Miami City Hall reported a thunderstorm with a gust of up to 64 mph. June 13, 2014 – A thunderstorm near Kendale Lakes records a wind gust of 62 mph and multiple trees reported down at the Miccosukee Golf and Country Club. April 19, 2014 – Cold front produces showers and thunderstorms with a gust reported up to 61 mph. February 12, 2014 – Strong cold front cased thunderstorms with wind gust of 70 mph. September 15, 2013 – Strong to severe level winds cause power outages. Reports of a wind gust of 58 mph and a tree down. April 15, 2013 – Afternoon thunderstorms with wind gusts up to 61 mph reported with damage to a carport. September 19, 2012 – Scattered thunderstorms over South Florida caused a thunder- storm in Kendall that causes large tree branches to break. June 6, 2012 – Severe thunderstorm with high wind gusts and hail occurred in Miami- Dade. Reports of numerous trees downed reported in Leisure City, South Miami Heights and Princeton. Wind gusts were estimated at 60 mph. In Perrine, several signs from businesses were blown off a building. May 20, 2012 – Tree branches in 3-4 inches in diameter were snapped in Miami Lakes due to a severe storm. May 18, 2012 – Large tree branches were snapped and broken off in a two-square-block area near the intersection of SW 8th Street and SW 142th Avenue, resulting from a down- burst associated with a severe thunderstorm. Trees were also reported down in Sweet- water and Doral. Winds were estimated between 60-70 mph and large trees were up- rooted and a light pole was downed in Doral. 131 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-125 May 8, 2012 –A strong thunderstorm produced a wind gust of 68 mph, measured by a Mesonet site at Sun Life Stadium. Vulnerability Physical Vulnerabilities The entire built environment (Critical Infrastructure, Key Resources, Building Stock) may be vulnerable to severe storms due to wind or hail damages. These types of events could cause power outages or some structural damages to mobile/manufactured homes (see Hurricanes/Tropical Storms for a listing), communications towers, or damage trees and overhead utilities. Underground utilities could be impacted if trees topple and uproot these systems. Severe weather may also cause flying debris to cause additional dam- ages. Structures in areas where there has been repetitive losses and no mitigation may also be at higher risk but past flooding events do not necessarily indicate future flooding problems. Areas with ongoing construction or drainage problems may also be at greater risk. Parks and open spaces where people congregate outside are vulnerable to severe weather that may roll in with little notice, this includes coastal beaches, Crandon Park, all County and State parks, large venues such as the Homestead- Miami Speedway, Sunlife Stadium, and Marlins Park. Social Vulnerabilities People who live in areas prone to flooding and may be uninsured or underinsured are at greatest risk. The cost of insurance may be prohibitive and people who live outside of a flood zone may believe they are not at risk. People who rent properties may not be aware of their flood risk as it may not be disclosed by the owner or they may not know the history of the area. Electric dependent and persons living in mobile/manufactured homes may be at greater risk when it occurs in their areas. Tornado Description A tornado is a narrow, violently rotating column of air that extends from the base of a thunderstorm to the ground. Tornado are one of the most violent of atmospheric storms and they come from two types of thunderstorms, supercell and non-supercell. The most violent tornadoes are capable of tremendous destruction with wind speeds of 250 mph or more. Damage paths can be in excess of one mile wide and 50 miles long. A majority of tornadoes, however, have wind speeds of 112 mph or less. Florida tornadoes occur in the greatest number during June, July and August. These are typically small, short-lived events that can produce minor damage and seldom take lives. Florida’s most deadly tornado outbreaks occur in the spring. A tornado’s strength is determined by looking at the damage that it caused. From the damage, the winds speeds can be estimated. In 2007, the National Weather Service implemented that Enhanced Fujita Scale (EF scale), which takes into account more vari- ables than the original Fujita Scale (F scale) for a more consistent and accurate manner. 132 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-126 TABLE 10: OPERATIONAL ENHANCED FUJITA SCALE EF Number 3 Second Gust (mph) 0 65 – 85 1 86 – 110 2 111 – 135 3 136 – 165 4 166 – 200 5 Over 200 Source: Storm Prediction Center Waterspouts, tornadoes that occur over bodies of water, are common along the southeast U.S. coast, especially off Southern Florida and the Keys. They are smaller and weaker than the most intense tornadoes, but still can be quite dangerous. Waterspouts can over- turn small boats, damage ships, create significant damage when hitting land, and kill peo- ple. Location The entire county is equally vulnerable to tornadoes. Extent EF-3 tornado could be experienced. Impact Miami-Dade ranks fourth in the state with eighty-six (86) reported tornadoes from 1971 to 2002. Based on data from 1950-2017, there has been 137 occurrences of tornadoes in Miami-Dade that have resulted in 159 injuries, 1 death and $202 million in damage.48 The F-3 tornado in 1959 touched down in Coral Gables and moved over the Miami business district and Biscayne Bay and impacted Sunny Isles. Most injuries were from flying and broken glass. Another occurrence on March 27, 2003 had a tornado that peaked as an F-2 that hit the Brownsville/Liberty City neighborhood. One person was killed in their home by tree debris and fourteen people were injured. FEMA damage estimates included $2.2M for housing assistance and $6.2M for other assistance, totaling $8.4M.49 Previous Occurrences January 23, 2017 – During the overnight and pre-dawn hours of January 23rd, a powerful squall line well ahead of a cold front over the Gulf of Mexico moved over South Florida. The line of storms resulted in a tornado touching down several times. The tornado first touchdown was near the Palmetto Expressway and NW 48th Street at 3:45 am. It then touched back down on the east side of the Palmetto Expressway, from NW 50th Street to NW 52nd Street between NW 74th and 69th Avenue. The damages in this area included 48 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Climatic Data Center, Storm Events Data- base: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/ 49 National Weather Service Miami – South Florida, Series of Tornadoes Hit South Florida Including Mi- ami and Miami-Dade County. 133 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-127 an overturn tractor trailer, about 24 empty cargo containers were moved and an office building sustained minor roof damage. These were EF-0 borderline EF-1 damages (75- 85 mph winds). The tornado continued a northeast track and moved into the Miami Springs area with winds most likely in the EF-1 range (90-95 mph). Loss of roof covering material and downed trees was reported in the “Bird District” between Shadow and Lundlum Avenue and Falcon and Dove Avenue. As it continued its track through Miami Springs, more damage was recorded east of Hammond Drive to Okeechobee Road where downed power lines and trees were reported. Once it crossed Okeechobee Road and entered in to the City of Hialeah it caused EF-1 damage from Red Road to W 2nd Avenue between West 10th and 13th Streets. In this area, four apartment buildings sus- tained roof damage and although the tornado passed very close to a water plant, it did not sustain any damage. The tornado lifted near W 2nd Avenue and W 13th street. 13 families were displaced in Hialeah and required assistance by the American Red Cross. February 16, 2016 – A squall line moving through Florida produced an EF-0 tornado in NE Miami-Dade. The tornado had an intermittent path of about 3.4 miles and affected the areas between NE 191st Street and Ives Dairy Road, from NW 8th Avenue to NE 23rd Avenue. Damage consisted of uprooted trees, several leaning poles and minimal struc- tural damage, including several structures with roof damage. No injuries or fatalities were reported. May 15, 2014 – Miami International Airport tower officials reported a tornado 1 mile west of them. Minor damage consistent with an EF-0 with maximum winds estimated at 65 mph damaging trees, street signs and a vehicle. July 20, 2013 – A funnel cloud east of Kendall Regional Medical Center was reported. May 22, 2013 – A funnel cloud was reported near Princeton. January 4, 2013 – Several funnel clouds were reported in areas of Kendall, Cutler Bay, near Zoo Miami and the Dolphin Mall in Sweetwater. No reports of touchdowns. August 3, 2012 – A tropical wave in the northern Bahamas and western Caribbean pro- duces thunderstorms in South Florida and a funnel cloud was reported in the Richmond Heights area. July 28, 2012 – A tiny funnel cloud was reported near Homestead General Airport. No reported damages. July 16, 2012 – A rope-like funnel cloud was reported over the Redlands, west of Krome. No known damages. June 29, 2012 – Homestead General Aviation reported a funnel cloud west of Home- stead, it did not touch down or cause damage. 134 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-128 June 24, 2012 – Golden Beach Police reported a waterspout moving onshore moving north. The path was approximately 0.5 miles and it was estimated as an EF-0. Beach chairs were tossed about 30 feet in the air and there was damage to trees and a hut. One residence also had damage to a metal gate and trees. Damages about $10K. Vulnerability Physical Vulnerabilities The entire built environment is vulnerable to tornadoes depending on where it hits (may be directly or indirectly impacted). Mobile and manufactured homes tend to sustain the most damage from a tornado due to their lighter weight building materials. A list of mobile home parks in Miami-Dade is provided in the Hurricane/Tropical Storm section. Unrein- forced concrete buildings and wood structures may be more vulnerable to tornado dam- age. Power lines and trees may be downed or underground utilities may be uprooted when trees topple. Social Vulnerabilities People with disabilities such as decreased vision or hearing may not be aware of the tornado warnings. Electrically dependent individuals may rely on life-sustaining medical equipment and may be at greater risk due to power outages. Wildfire Description Wildfire is defined by the Florida Forest Service (FFS) as any fire that does not meet management objectives or is out of control. Wildfires occur in Florida every year and are part of the natural cycle of Florida’s fire-adapted ecosystems. Many of these fires are quickly suppressed before they can damage or destroy property, homes and lives. There are four types of wildfires: • Surface Fires: Burn along the forest floor consuming the litter layer and small branches on or near the ground. • Ground Fires: Smolder or creep slowly underground. These fires usually occur during periods of prolonged drought and may burn for weeks or months until suf- ficient rainfall extinguishes the fire, or it runs out of fuel. • Crown Fires: Spread rapidly by the wind, moving through the tops of the trees. • Wildland-Urban Interface Fires: Fires occurring within the Wildland-Urban Inter- face (WUI) in areas where structures and other human developments meet or in- termingle with wildlands or vegetative fuels. Homes and other flammable struc- tures can become fuel for WUI fires. 135 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-129 A wildfire is a naturally occurring event, often ignited by lightning or discarded cigarettes, and/or unattended camp fires and fueled by grasses, brush, and trees. Wildfires help to control the buildup of woody debris, improve soil conditions, reduce weedy and invasive plants, re- duce plant disease, and maintain the habitat conditions thus providing a healthy ecosystem. Fires in the Ever- glades tend to happen annually, with rapid wet-season fires, often started by lightning. Dry-season fires are less common, but can be more damaging. Location Wildfires are most likely to occur in the western portions of Miami-Dade County within one mile of the WUI and the Everglades. Extent 2000 acres. Impact In previous events homes have been threatened by wildfire, the Turnpike Ex- tension and the Don Shula Expressway were closed due to heavy smoke, and acres of farmland and fields of grasses were de- stroyed. TABLE 11: FIRE DANGER LEVELS Level Criteria Low Ignition: Fuels do not ignite readily from small firebrands although a more intense heat source, such as lightning, may start fires. Spread: Fires in open cured grasslands may burn freely a few hours after rain, but woods fires spread slowly by creeping or smoldering, and burn in irregular fingers. Spotting: There is little danger of spotting. Control: Easy Moderate Ignition: Fires can start from most accidental causes, but with the exception of lightning fires in some areas, the number of starts is generally low. Spread: Fires in open cured grasslands will burn briskly and spread rapidly on windy days. Timber fires spread slowly to moderately fast. The average fire is of moderate intensity, alt- hough heavy concentrations of fuel, especially draped fuel, may burn hot. Spotting: Short-distance spotting may occur, but is not persistent. Control: Fires are not likely to become serious and control is relatively easy. 136 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-130 Level Criteria High Ignition: All fine dead fuels ignite readily and fires start easily from most causes. Unat- tended brush and campfires are likely to escape. Spread: Fires spread rapidly. High-intensity burning may develop on slopes or in concentra- tions of fine fuels. Spotting: Short-distance spotting is common. Control: Fires may become serious and their control difficult unless they are attacked suc- cessfully while small. Very High Ignition: Fires start easily from all causes. Spread: Immediately after ignition, spread rapidly and increase quickly in intensity. Fires burning in light fuels may quickly develop high intensity characteristics such as long-dis- tance spotting and fire whirlwinds when they burn into heavier fuels. Spotting: Spot fires are a constant danger; long distance spotting likely. Control: Direct attack at the head of such fires is rarely possible after they have been burn- ing more than a few minutes. Extreme Ignition: Fires start quickly and burn intensely. All fires are potentially serious. Spread: Furious spread likely, along with intense burning. Development into high intensity burning will usually be faster and occur from smaller fires than in the very high fire danger class. Spotting: Spot fires are a constant danger; long distance spotting occurs easily. Control: Direct attack is rarely possible and may be dangerous except immediately after ig- nition. Fires that develop headway in heavy slash or in conifer stands may be unmanagea- ble while the extreme burning condition lasts. Under these conditions the only effective and safe control action is on the flanks until the weather changes or the fuel supply lessens. Source: National Fire Danger Rating System Previous Occurrences June 7-12, 2011 – A rapidly growing Praire Fire began west of suburban Miami and north of Highway 41. Strong northeast winds were pushing the fire towards the park boundary burning across Krome Avenue, burning in an area with highly flammable melaleuca trees and an area of sawgrass. Usually, this is the wettest area of the Everglades region, but due to the dry conditions during this period, as discussed in the drought section, the fire was able to extend eight miles in one afternoon. On June 12, the fire was contained at 67,977 acres, east of the L-67 canal preventing it from moving west into Big Cypress National Preserve.50 May 29, 2011 – A wildfire threatened the Everglades Correctional Institution including an armory belonging to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) which contained a mixture munitions and chemical agents. The fire was able to be contained on the same day at 10.5 acres of the highly volatile melaleuca trees.51 50 http://www.nps.gov/fire/wildland-fire/connect/fire-stories/2011-parks/everglades-national-park-fire- aid.cfm 51 http://www.nps.gov/fire/wildland-fire/connect/fire-stories/2011-parks/everglades-national-park-fire- aid.cfm 137 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-131 May 7, 2008 – Redland area a large grass fire ignited on a form and burned some farm equipment and 20 acres. April 5, 2000 – Homestead a 50-acre wildfire destroyed two mobile homes and two boats, estimated damages $100K. March 3, 1999 – Redland area about a dozen wildfires burned as winds gusting near 30 mph quickly spread the flames. None of the fires exceeded 100 acres but a plant nursery was destroyed and several homes were threatened. Smoke closed the Florida Turnpike Extension and the Don Shula Expressway for several hours. There have been four federally declared wildfire events. TABLE 12: PRESIDENTIALLY DECLARED WILDFIRE EVENTS IN MIAMI-DADE Disaster Type Disaster Number Title Incident Begin Date Declaration Date Incident End Date Disaster Close Out Date FS 2359 FL - EVERGLADES FIRE COMPLEX - 04/25/01 4/17/2001 4/25/2001 9/16/2003 EM 3139 FL-FIRES 04/15/99 4/15/1999 4/27/1999 5/25/1999 4/14/2004 FS 2256 FL-FIRES 04/13/99 4/13/1999 4/18/1999 7/26/2002 DR 1223 EXTREME FIRE HAZARD 5/25/1998 6/18/1998 7/22/1998 6/21/2011 Vulnerability Physical Vulnerabilities The built environment (Critical Infrastructure, Key Resources and Building Stock) and natural environment that are closest to the Everglades, agricultural areas or large open spaces are at a higher risk for exposure from wildfires. Critical facilities would include the Homestead Correction Institute, Dade Correctional Institution, Dade Juvenile Residential Facility, Everglades Correctional Institution, Krome North Service Processing Center, South Florida Reception Center, and Metro-West Detention Center. Residential areas of concern would include the Everglades Labor Camp, Gator Park Mobile Home Park, and Jones Fishing Camp Trailer Park. Visibility on roads may be compromised due to smoke and this may lead to the need for road closures or increased traffic accidents. Social Vulnerabilities Populations with respiratory complications may be at greater risk due to air quality issues in relation to wildfires. The social vulnerability section should be reviewed for more infor- mation on how these types of circumstances may affect populations differently. Winter Storm Description Severe winter weather includes extreme cold, snowfall, ice storms, winter storms, and/or strong winds, and affects every state in the continental United States. Areas where such 138 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-132 weather is uncommon, such as Florida, are typically affected more by winter weather than regions that experience this weather more frequently. W inter weather hazard events in Miami-Dade occur when high winds, and cold temperatures occur. In Miami-Dade, most winter concerns revolve around protecting crops from cold temperatures and providing shelter for vulnerable populations such as the homeless. Extreme cold conditions in Flor- ida are considered to be slightly above freezing. Location The entire county is vulnerable to winter weather, inland portions tend to see colder tem- peratures by a few degrees. These areas tend to be south of Kendall Drive and west of the Florida Turnpike, primarily the Redland area and areas west of Homestead and Flor- ida City. Extent 26 degrees F with cold weather shelters open for over 10 consecutive days. TABLE 13: AVERAGE FREEZE DATES FOR SOUTH FLORIDA52 LOCATION EARLIEST FREEZE AVG FIRST FREEZE AVG LAST FREEZE LATEST FREEZE HIALEAH DECEMBER 15 DECEMBER 21-31 JANUARY 21-31 MARCH 3 HOMESTEAD DECEMBER 28 DECEMBER 21-31 JANUARY 21-31 JANUARY 31 MIAMI BEACH DECEMBER 24 DECEMBER 21-31 JANUARY 21-31 MARCH 3 MIAMI DECEMBER 11 DECEMBER 21-31 JANUARY 21-31 MARCH 3 Impact In January 2010, Miami-Dade experienced two back to back cold fronts, with tempera- tures below freezing in the interior portions of the county. Crop damage was extensive and severe, with estimates in excess of $500M in the region. Thousands of customers experienced intermittent power outages due to record-setting usage demands. Hazards such as carbon monoxide poisoning and household fires are increased in improperly ven- tilated homes during severe winter weather events. The loss of utilities stress resources and puts vulnerable populations at risk. Two fatalities were noted from exposure to cold, a homeless man in Fort Lauderdale and an elderly man in an unheated apartment in Miami. Cold weather shelters were open for over 10 consecutive nights in many areas of South Florida. Previous Occurrences January 3, 2012 – Temperatures dropped to the freezing mark over parts of inland Miami- Dade County on the night of January 3rd and early morning of January 4th, with tempera- tures at these values for 2-4 hours. Areas most affected were the Redland and Home- stead areas. Damage to most sensitive crops (beans, herbs, squash, and Asian vegeta- bles) was about 15-20%. A few wind-protected fields suffered near-total losses. 52 National Weather Service Miami Office 139 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-133 Early January 2010 – Very cold air of arctic origin in the wake of a front produced freezing temperatures and very low wind chills to all of South Florida. Freezing temperatures were noted over almost all of South Florida on the mornings of January 10th and 11th. Four consecutive nights of below freezing temperatures occurred over interior sections of South Florida from January 10th through January 13th. The combination of this episode and the first one between January 1st and January 7th produced the coldest 12-day period of temperatures on record at several South Florida locations. Crop damage was exten- sive and severe, with total damage estimates in the excess of $51 million in Miami-Dade. Thousands of customers experienced intermittent power outages during this period due to record-setting usage demands. Wind chills dropped below 35 degrees Fahrenheit and remained mostly in the 20s from the evening hours of January 9th through midday on January 10th. January 5, 2001 – A freeze occurred throughout the interior sections of South Florida, causing damage to certain crops. The hardest hit were certain vegetable crops with 30% losses in the farming areas of south Miami-Dade County. Other crops that were damaged included newly planted sugar cane, ornamentals, and tropical fruits. A heavy frost oc- curred in the western suburbs of Miami-Dade. TABLE 14: PRESIDENTIALLY DECLARED FREEZE EVENTS IN MIAMI-DADE Disaster Type Disaster Number Title Incident Begin Date Declaration Date Incident End Date Disaster Close Out Date DR 1359 SEVERE FREEZE 12/1/2000 2/5/2001 1/25/2001 5/14/2010 DR 851 SEVERE FREEZE 12/23/1989 1/15/1990 12/25/1989 4/23/1996 DR 732 SEVERE FREEZE 3/18/1985 3/18/1985 3/18/1985 10/27/1988 DR 526 SEVERE WINTER WEATHER 1/31/1977 1/31/1977 1/31/1977 12/18/1978 DR 304 FREEZE 3/15/1971 3/15/1971 3/15/1971 6/18/1973 Source: data.gov, FEMA Disaster Declarations Summary Vulnerability Physical Vulnerabilities Little of the built environment (Critical Infrastructure, Key Resources and Building Stock) is vulnerable to winter storms. Pipes carrying water to households could freeze and ex- pand causing pipes to burst. Inadequately heated or insulated homes may resort to heat- ing by kerosene heaters or stoves. These methods of heating are dangerous and con- tribute to carbon monoxide poisoning and household fires. Agricultural interests are more vulnerable to winter storms and frost can destroy crops. Crops most vulnerable to win- terstorms and freezes are the ones that are grown during the winter months and har- vested in the spring months including cantaloupe, carambola, celery, cucumbers, dragon fruit, eggplant, fennel, guava, greenbeens, herbs, jackfruit, longan, lychee, mushrooms, onions, papaya, passion fruit, plantains, radishes, sapodilla, spinach, squash, strawber- ries, sweetcorn, thyme, tomatoes and zucchini. Social Vulnerabilities 140 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-134 Extreme cold weather is a particularly dangerous hazard for at risk populations such as the homeless, elderly, low income or people living in homes without heating or means to keep warm. These populations include those who have a difficult time keeping warm or finding a heat source during an extreme cold event. The homeless are particularly at risk. Age groups such as the elderly and infants have limited physiological capability to keep warm. It is estimated that there are about 4,150 homeless people in Miami-Dade County. Larger concentrations of homeless tend to be near the downtown Miami and Miami Beach areas. Body warming mechanisms such as "goose bumps" and shivering are restricted in these groups. Outdoor animals and pets are also at risk of extreme cold temperatures. Natural Hazards by Jurisdiction The following chart depicts the probability risk by location of all of the natural hazards. The estimate of risk is based on the judgment of local planners and the LMS Working Group regarding the likely frequency of occurrence of the hazard event based on the location of the jurisdiction to the hazard potentially occurring. Sea Level Rise probabilities were determined by potential future risk as identified in the map in the Sea Level Rise section. The rankings are Low (L), Medium (M) and High (H). 141 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-135 TABLE 15: NATURAL HAZARDS BY JURISDICTION Jurisdiction Drought Erosion Flooding Hurricane/ Tropical Storm Saltwater Intrusion Sea Level Rise Severe Storm Tornado Wildfires Winter Storms Aventura M L H H H H H H L M Bal Harbour M H H H H H H H L M Bay Harbor M H H H H H H H L M Biscayne Park M L H H H L H H L M Coral Gables M L H H H H H H L M Cutler Bay M L H H H H H H L M Doral M L H H L H H H L M El Portal M L H H H M H H L M Florida City M L H H H H H H M M Golden Beach M H H H H H H H L M Hialeah M L H H L M H H L M Hialeah Gardens M L H H L M H H L M Homestead M L H H H H H H M M Key Biscayne M H H H H H H H L M Medley M L H H L M H H L M Miami M L H H H L H H L M Miami Beach M H H H H H H H L M Miami Gardens M L H H L M H H L M Miami Lakes M L H H L M H H L M Miami Shores M L H H H M H H L M Miami Springs M L H H L M H H L M North Bay Village M L H H H M H H L M North Miami M H H H H H H H L M North Miami Beach M L H H H H H H L M Opa-locka M L H H L M H H L M Palmetto Bay M L H H H H H H L M Pinecrest M L H H H H H H L M South Miami M L H H L L H H L M Sunny Isles M H H H H H H H L M Surfside M H H H H H H H L M Sweetwater M L H H L M H H L M Virginia Gardens M L H H L L H H L M West Miami M L H H L L H H L M Unincorporated M H H H H H H H M M 142 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-136 Miami-Dade County Critical Facilities Inventory The LMSWG recognizes the importance of mitigation to critical facilities and as such uses data supplied by the municipalities and the various county departments to develop a database which includes the critical facilities inventory, NFIP repetitive loss data, his- toric flood data and the locations of hazardous materials that fall under the jurisdiction of Section 302 of the Federal Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act. This data has been supplied by the Miami-Dade County Division of Environmental Re- sources Management (DERM) and the State Emergency Response Commission. Similarly, Miami-Dade and the municipalities control a huge inventory of properties. Therefore, due to its voluminous size, the listing of non-critical municipal public building and facilities will be maintained separately by the county and each municipality. A critical facilities inventory is maintained by Miami-Dade Office of Emergency Manage- ment (OEM) and the Miami-Dade Information Technology Department (ITD) that includes those facilities that have been deemed critical by the state and federal governments. A copy has been supplied to FDEM as well. The inventory includes GIS coverage for the following: the Miami-Dade County street network, day care centers, medical facilities (MMF, hospitals, nursing homes, adult living facilities), Miami-Dade fire stations, munici- pal fire stations, Miami-Dade police stations, municipal police stations, solid waste man- agement sites, sewage treatment plants, sewer pump stations, water treatment plants, Miami-Dade County schools, hazardous materials sites, municipal critical facilities inven- tory, the Miami-Dade evacuation network, and hurricane evacuation centers. In 2014 OEM and ITD updated the Debris Management Plan to update debris clearance measures including critical facilities. While the state and federal government defines critical facilities as those listed above, the Miami-Dade LMSWG has defined critical facilities in three types or levels, which are: • Level 1 – A facility that must remain available in all circumstances and at all times. The community cannot do without this facility at all. Protective measures are an absolute must. • Level 2 – A facility that must be restored within twenty-four hours or risk dire con- sequences to the community. • Level 3 – A facility that must be restored within seventy-two hours or the commu- nity may suffer major problems. The LMSWG concludes that any facility that the community can do without for more than seventy-two hours is not truly critical; important perhaps, but not critical. Data Sources Identified We have identified the following data sources as being important and comprehensive to the accomplishment of our mitigation goals. However, additional data sources will surely be discovered as we proceed with the task of mitigation. 143 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-137 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) • National Flood Insurance Program repetitive loss inventory. • Flood Insurance Rate Maps, hurricane storm surge maps, and previous natural haz- ard computer modeling results. New FIRM maps were implemented in 2009 and Miami-Dade is currently undergoing a Coastal Study that is slated to be complete in 2019. • The FEMA website www.fema.gov has a wealth of accumulated data that can be extremely valuable in developing mitigation measures. Other U. S. Government Databases and Information Sources • National Hurricane Center and the National Oceanographic Atmospheric Administra- tion (NOAA) historical storm related data (including, National Climatic Data Center). • The National Weather Service Miami Forecast Office data files. • National Hurricane Center “SLOSH” models. • National Priorities List (NPL) • Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System List (CERCLIS – the “Superfund”) • No Further Remedial Action Planned List (NFRAP) • Emergency Response Notification System List (ERNS) • RCRA Corrective Action Tracking System List (CORRACTS) • Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System List (RCRIS) • Hazardous Waste Data Management System List (HWDMS) • Facility Index Data System List (FINDS) • Toxic Release Inventory System List (TRIS) • U. S. Immigration and Naturalization Service databases. State of Florida • Florida State University Department of Meteorology hurricane historical database. • State-Funded Action Sites List (SFAS). • State Sites List (SITES). • Solid Waste Facilities List (SLDWST). • Petroleum Contamination Tracking System Report (PCTS). • Stationary Tank Inventory System List (TANKS). • Hazardous Waste Compliance & Enforcement Tracking System List (COMHAZ). • South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). Miami-Dade County • Municipal and County Emergency Management Plans and Comprehensive Plans. • Municipal and County Floodplain Management Plans. • Miami-Dade Stormwater Management Master Plan and Capital Improvements Pro- jects. • Miami-Dade County, Division of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) GIS database. • Miami-Dade County, Information Technology Department, Critical Facilities Inventory and other GIS databases. 144 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-138 • Enforcement Case Tracking System Report (ECTS). • Fuel Spill Report (FSPILL). • Hazardous Waste Report (HW). • Industrial Waste Reports. • Underground Storage Tanks Report (UST). • Agriculture extension services and databases. Municipal Agencies Staff resources, records and data files. Additional Resources • The American Red Cross will provide information regarding shelters, as well as staff resources and records • Internet web sites provided by the Florida Division of Emergency Management as part of the Local Mitigation Strategy Guidebook CONFLICT RESOLUTION PROCEDURES The Miami-Dade County Local Mitigation Strategy Working Group has established pro- cedures to resolve conflicts between member entities that may arise from the develop- ment of the LMS. It has borrowed extensively from the Regional Dispute Resolution Pro- cess of the South Florida Regional Planning Council. These procedures are designed to clearly identify and resolve problems as early as pos- sible, to utilize procedures in a low-cost to high-cost sequence, to allow flexibility in which procedures are used, to provide for the appropriate involvement of affected and respon- sible parties, and to provide as much process certainty as possible. There are two basic components: process initiation and settlement meetings. Addition- ally, there are five optional components: pre-initiation meeting, situation assessments, mediation, advisory decision-making, and referral to other dispute resolution processes. The Working Group consists of representatives from Miami-Dade County, its incorporated municipalities, county departments and other participating organizations. In the event of a dispute, parties named in the Initiation Letter (see below) are automati- cally allowed to participate. Other jurisdictions, public or private organizations, groups, or individuals must be suggested by a named party and agreed to by a majority of the named parties before inclusion; or recommended for inclusion by a mediator mutually selected by the named parties. Other jurisdictions, public and private organizations, groups, or individuals seeking to be- come named parties can submit a written petition to the Working Group. Such groups will become named parties if agreed to by a majority of the named parties or by a mutually selected mediator. Named parties have twenty-one days to respond to the Initiation Let- ter. 145 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-139 Each named party must appoint a representative who should have authority to act. Ju- risdictions are encouraged to designate a representative before one is needed. This per- son will be responsible for the party’s interests and maintain communication throughout the process. The representative must be named in writing. • Pre-Initiation Meeting: Any jurisdiction, organization, group or individual may re- quest an informal pre-initiation meeting with the Working Group coordinator. • Initiation Letter: The conflict resolution process begins with an Initiation Letter from a jurisdiction’s governing body, which is sent to all named parties and the Working Group coordinator. This must be accompanied by either a resolution or written authorization from the same governing body. The Initiation Letter must identify the issues to be discussed; named parties to be in- volved; name of the initiating party’s representative; others who will attend; and a brief history of the dispute that indicates why this dispute is appropriate for this process. • Response Letter: The named parties must send a response letter to the Working Group coordinator and all other named parties. The response letter must indicate the respondent’s willingness to participate in a settlement meeting and include any additional issues for discussion as well as a brief description and history of the dispute from the respondent’s point of view. • Situation Assessment: At the request of a jurisdiction, organization, group, or indi- vidual, the Working Group coordinator or other neutral party can perform a situa- tion assessment at any time, before or after initiation of the process. The situation assessment can involve examination of documents, interviews and assessment meetings, and can result in a recommendation concerning the issues to be ad- dressed, parties that may participate, appropriate dispute resolution procedures, and a proposed schedule. Private interests may ask any member of the Working Group to initiate the process. Any public or private organization, group, or individual may request that the Working Group recommend use of the process. The Working Group can recommend that a potential dispute is suitable for the process and transmit its recommendation to the potential par- ties. All requests must be in writing and provide all required information. A Working Group representative must respond after reviewing the petitioner’s request; meeting with the requesting organization, group, or individual; and performing a situation assessment. If the Working Group representative agrees with this process, a recommendation will be sent to the potential parties. • Settlement Meetings: At a minimum, the representatives of the named parties must attend the first settlement meeting. This meeting may be facilitated by a 146 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-140 member of the Working Group or a mutually agreed upon neutral facilitator. At the initial settlement meeting the named parties must consider adding named parties; consider guidelines for participation; identify the issues to be addressed; explore options for a solution; and seek agreement. If the settlement meeting is not held or it produces no agreement to proceed with media- tion or advisory decision making, then the participating parties may formally withdraw from the process or proceed to a joint meeting of the governing bodies (as in Florida Statute 164); litigation; administrative hearing; or arbitration. • Mediation: If two or more named parties submit a request for mediation to the Working Group, then a representative of the Working Group will assist them in selecting and retaining a mediator. Alternatively, the named parties may request that the Working Group coordinator make the selection or request similar assis- tance from the South Florida Regional Planning Council. A mediator who understands hazard mitigation issues and is acceptable to the named parties shall mediate all disputes. Mediators shall be guided by the Standards of Pro- fessional Conduct, Florida Rules for Certified and Court Appointed Mediators, Rules 10.020-10.150 F.A.C. • Advisory Decision Making: If two or more named parties submit a request for advisory decision making to the Working Group, then a representative of the Working Group will assist in selecting and retaining an appropriate neutral. Al- ternatively, the named parties may request that the Working Group coordinator make the selection. A neutral party that understands hazard mitigation issues and is acceptable to the named parties shall handle all disputes. Initial settlement meetings are scheduled and held within thirty days of receipt of the ini- tiation letter. Additional settlement meetings, mediation, or advisory decision-making must be completed within forty-five days of the date of the conclusion of the initial settle- ment meeting. Timeframes may be altered by mutual agreement of the named parties. The optional components of this process may be used in any order. In the early stages of the process, the parties should address deferring or seeking stays of judicial or administrative proceedings while using this process. The form of all agreements shall be determined by the named parties and may include: inter-local agreements; concurrent resolutions; memoranda of understanding; contracts; plan amendments; deed restrictions; or other forms as appropriate. Agreements signed by the party’s representative may be in the form of a recommendation to a formal body and subject to its formal approval. 147 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 1: The Strategy January 2018 P1-141 Two or more parties may reach agreements even if all of the named parties don’t agree or don’t sign a formal agreement. After settlement meetings, mediation, or advisory decision-making, the named parties must submit a joint report to the Working Group. The report must contain any statements that any of the named parties wants included as well as: • An identification of the issues discussed; • A list of potentially affected or involved jurisdictions, public or private organizations, groups, or individuals (even those who are not named parties); • A timeframe for starting and ending informal negotiations, additional settlement meetings, mediation, advisory decision making, joint meetings of elected bodies, administrative hearings or litigation; • Any additional assistance required; • A cost allocation agreement; and • A description of responsibilities and schedules for implementing and enforcing agreements reached. Appropriate opportunities for public input should be considered during the process. Ap- plicable public notices and public records requirements must be observed (Chapters 119 and 120, F.S.). The participants agree to make every effort to keep costs at a minimum. All costs are to be shared equally among the parties unless otherwise agreed upon or as recommended by a mediator mutually selected by the parties. To the extent possible, the confidentiality provisions of Chapter 44, F.S. will govern me- diation under this process. By participating in this process, participants agree not to offer any comments, meeting records, or written or verbal settlement offers as evidence in subsequent judicial or administrative action. For further information please contact: Cathie Perkins LMS Coordinator 9300 NW 41st Street Miami, FL 33178 (305) 468-5400 Cathie.perkins@miamidade.gov mdlms@miamidade.gov website: http://www.miamidade.gov/fire/mitigation.asp 148 Local Mitigation Strategy Whole Community Hazard Mitigation Part 2: The Projects June 2018 149 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 2: The Projects June 2018 P2-ii This page left intentionally blank. 150 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 2: The Projects June 2018 P2-i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................... 1 PROJECT SUBMITTAL AND TRACKING ................................................................................................. 1 PROJECT REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................................................. 1 UPDATES AND REPORTS .................................................................................................................... 3 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION .............................................................................. 4 LETTERS OF SUPPORT ....................................................................................................................... 4 PROJECT ARCHIVING ......................................................................................................................... 4 PROJECT DELETION ........................................................................................................................... 4 INACTIVE PROJECTS .......................................................................................................................... 5 PRIORITIZING MITIGATION INITIATIVES ............................................................ 5 APPENDIX 1– SAMPLE PROJECT ....................................................................................... 11 APPENDIX 2– DELETED/DEFERRED PROJECTS ............................................................... 13 APPENDIX 3– PROJECT LIST ............................................................................................ 14 151 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 2: The Projects June 2018 P2-ii This page left intentionally blank. 152 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 2: The Projects June 2018 P2-1 INTRODUCTION Part 2 of the Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) – The Projects – is a com- pilation of projects identified by Working Group members for mitigation measures/ac- tions they have completed, are pursuing or one day hope to implement and how they are submitted, tracked, maintained and prioritized. 1 METHODOLOGY Over the years the listing of LMS projects have shifted from primarily being a tool to identify unfunded projects with hopes of securing mitigation grants to a tool to identify any project a stakeholder is implementing or hopes to implement that will make our community more resilient. We are utilizing the LMS to showcase the work being per- formed and the projects envisioned to lessen the impacts of disasters on our commu- nities. Project Submittal and Tracking In 2013 a web-based LMS Project board was developed in our incident tracking soft- ware known as WebEOC. This system allows LMSWG members to input new pro- jects and update existing projects at any time throughout the year. The LMS Coordi- nator is responsible for the review of the projects and providing an update the State of Florida every January. The LMS Coordinator will post an update of the current list of projects every January and July on the LMS website - http://www.miami- dade.gov/fire/mitigation.asp It is the responsibility of the LMSWG members that post projects to ensure the projects are compliant with the local and FEMA requirements identified below. The LMS Co- ordinator may also require additional information. Agencies with projects will be noti- fied of any additional requirements and when possible provided six months to come into compliance. Project Requirements Below is a list of the project fields and identification of requirement: Project List Field Level of Requirement Comments Agency Type Local Requirement Must be utilized to tie project to agency Agency Local and FEMA Requirement Must be utilized to tie project to agency Project Title FEMA Requirement Satisfies Name and Description Entry type FEMA Requirement Identifies new projects and project to be re- moved from Active List Original Date of Entry Default Identifies when the project was first put in the LMS Project list. 1 EMAP 2016 Standard 4.2.3 153 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 2: The Projects June 2018 P2-2 Project List Field Level of Requirement Comments Last Updated Default Identifies last date of update. If an agency fails to review and update projects on an an- nual basis they can be made inactive. Status FEMA Requirement Current status of project. Satisfies New, De- ferred, Completed or Deleted Hazard Local Requirement Allows us to sort hazard type for potential funding and identify flood projects in support of Part 7 Project Type Local Requirement Allows us to sort for funding options by type of project Mapper Label Not Required at this time For future use for mapping Address Local Requirement Will allow us to geo-code and map projects Longitude and Latitude Local Suggestions Will aid in future mapping of projects Flood Basin Local Requirement for Flood pro- jects, Local Suggestion for ALL projects Allows us to identify where mitigation pro- jects for flooding have been identified and fa- cilitate additional coordination and mapping. May assist with showing effectiveness of mit- igation projects after significant rain events. Completion Time Frame FEMA Requirement If a project is unfunded provide your best es- timation as to when this project could be completed. Mitigation Goals Local Requirement Shows alignment with LMS Funding Source FEMA Requirement FEMA lists this a potential funding source, we split this to also identify internal funding sources or potential grant sources Grant Source (Potential or secured) Is a Match Required Local Requirement May assist us with identifying projects for global match opportunities Match Identified Local Requirement Estimated Costs Local Requirement We are required to include this in the County Annual report. Global Match Local Requirement Identifies if the project may be able to be used a global match for another project in need of a match Project Description FEMA Requirement Comments Reserved for additional nota- tions LMS Coordinator notates and changes or re- quests for letters of support in this area. Attachments Local Suggestion Allows the agency to place supporting docu- ments in the database with the record. Name, Email and Phone Local Requirement Allows LMS Coordinator to contact POC di- rectly regarding projects BCA Completed and BCA score Required only when funding source requires this information. Must be completed if a letter of support is re- quested and the funding source requires it. Self-Prioritization Local Requirement Identifies agency priorities. Benefit Cost Review FEMA Requirement Provides a score based on Suitability, Risk Re- duction and Cost and Time. The LMS Coordinator, will, as able, notify the point of contact for projects that may be missing information. The LMS Coordinator will utilize the information provided to 154 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 2: The Projects June 2018 P2-3 develop documents and other supporting documents such as maps to track mitigation projects. The projects are listed in this document in a table format which is an abridged version of the full project description maintained in the WebEOC LMS Board. Additional in- formation on listed projects is available to all stakeholders with project accounts. An- yone wishing to have an account to add or review projects should make a request to the LMS Coordinator at mdlms@miamidade.gov or 305-468-5429. Updates and Reports As stated in Part 1, the LMS is updated on an annual basis and as part of a regular update and monitoring process. An annual update of the LMS is provided to the State by January 31st every year and the documents are subsequently posted on the local website. To keep the project list updated, agencies with listed projects are requested to review and update them within WebEOC on an annual basis by October 31. Part 2 of the LMS will be updated on the website in January, following a review of the updates by the LMS Coordinator. In 2018 a list was submitted by the end of January and an updated list was posted in June to account for projects that may have been updated for the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program for Hurricane Irma. In January every year the LMS Coordinator is required to provide a report to Miami- Dade Fire Rescue as part of the Department’s Annual Preparedness Report that is submitted to the County Mayor. The LMS Coordinator compiles information on pro- jects that have been completed, are under construction, or are funded but not yet started since the previous year’s report. This information is derived from the LMS Project list and is another way to showcase on an annual basis the progressive miti- gation work being accomplished. At all times, the latest published version of the LMS will be posted on the Miami-Dade County Internet website – http://www.miamidade.gov/fire/mitigation.asp – for public review and commentary. Any comments received through this medium will be incor- porated through the revision process identified in Part 1. An email address, mdlms@miamidade.gov, has been established for such commentary, which is strongly encouraged. The projects are listed in this document in Appendix 3 in a table format which is an abridged version of the full project description maintained in the WebEOC LMS Board. Appendix 1 shows a sample project as it is found in the WebEOC LMS Board. Addi- tional information on listed projects is available to all stakeholders with project ac- counts. Anyone wishing to have an account to add or review projects should make a request to the LMS Coordinator at mdlms@miamidade.gov or 305-468-5403. 155 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 2: The Projects June 2018 P2-4 Project Administration and Implementation The projects listed in Appendix 3 reflect the mitigation initiatives identified by members of the LMS Working Group. The initiator of the projects will be responsible for imple- mentation and administration. Due to the variable nature of procurement and con- tracting procedures; availability of resources; and weather conditions, accurate imple- mentation timelines are difficult to predict. Therefore, implementation timelines may not be developed for some projects until a funding source is identified and the factors above can be determined relative to the prevailing operating environment. Grant re- quirements may also dictate project implementation timelines for the appropriate re- cipient. If the project is funded through a grant, the grantee is responsible for imple- menting these projects as outlined in the grant’s regulations. Letters of Support The LMS Coordinator will write a letter of support for grant opportunities when a listed project has all of the required information provided. The LMS Coordinator will notify the requestor, if additional information is needed to be added to the project in order for a letter of support to be provided. Requests for letters must, at a minimum, be requested 10 working days in advance of the required deadline. Late requests may not be able to be facilitated. The LMS Coordinator will make notations in the Com- ments section as to date and action taken. The agency requesting a letter of support must be an active participant of the LMS, meaning they comply with the requirements set forth in Part 1 of the LMS. Currently the requirement is that they must attend at least two of the four quarterly meetings held each year or an equivalent committee or sub-committee meeting as a substitu- tion. Project Archiving The LMS Coordinator will archive a project once it has been marked as completed by the stakeholder. The LMS Coordinator will review the project file to ensure that all information has been included before it is officially archived. Archiving it will move it from the Active projects view to the Archive view. The LMS Coordinator will make notations in the Comments section as to date and action taken. Project Deletion From time to time stakeholders may wish to delete a project from the Project List. The LMS Coordinator will review any project that has been identified for deletion and call to discuss the project with the point of contact to verify that this is the desired action. Sometimes it may be better to make a project Inactive rather than completely deleting it, in case it may be a project that may be revisited at a later date. If the project is truly desired to be deleted the LMS Coordinator will send a confirmation email to the point of contact that this action has occurred. The project will be marked for deletion, a printout of the confirmation email and the project to be deleted will be filed and a notation will be made in Part 2 Appendix 2 that the project has been deleted and why. 156 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 2: The Projects June 2018 P2-5 Inactive Projects If a project has not been updated by October 31 does not have the required fields completed and the agency is non-compliant with meeting attendance, those projects associated with that agency or specific projects lacking required information or not updated on an annual basis will be made Inactive by the LMS Coordinator. The LMS Coordinator will notify the point of contact listed in the project or if none is listed a representative from the agency to notify them of the pending action. The agency will have until December 31 to update the project. Projects that are not updated by that time will be moved to Inactive status. At the first quarterly meeting of the year, the LMS Coordinator will make a motion to permanently delete any projects that have been made inactive and the agency has not responded or updated the projects by that time. PRIORITIZING MITIGATION INITIATIVES 2 Once the vulnerability assessment and risk analyses are complete and the hazard mitigation opportunities have been identified, proper priorities must be established concerning each proposed project’s impact on life safety, on quality of life, cost effec- tiveness and value to the overall community including but, by no means limited to, value as compared to other similar projects especially during times of limited funding availability. The Miami-Dade Office of Emergency Management is responsible for so- liciting, securing, evaluating, and generally acting as the technical & administrative staff for the management of the prioritization process and for the coordination of the implementation of initiatives selected for priority treatment. The prioritization process has been divided into three parameters: suitability, risk re- duction potential and cost. Within each parameter are recommended measures to be considered during prioritization of the project. This process is known as the Benefit Cost Review (BCR) and was updated in October 2013. Table 1 is the BCR that is utilized within the WebEOC LMS Board to meet the prioritization process requirement. Each agency when they add a project to the LMS Project List is required, as of June 31, 2014, to complete a self-prioritization process. It is important to note that this will be one level of consideration when limited funding sources are available to fund projects in Miami-Dade County. Other considerations include but are not limited to: • criteria of the available funding source • overall cost of a project in relation to the total monies available • readiness of projects for submittal • ability to meet any match obligations 2 EMAP 2016 Standard 4.2.2 157 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 2: The Projects June 2018 P2-6 • ability of project to be completed within any designated grant period • evaluation of other current and future mitigation funding opportunities • review of other current or impending mitigation measures that when combined may provide a more comprehensive, community or countywide resiliency There may be situations when the window for a funding opportunity is very limited and in situations like this, projects that are “shelf-ready” may be put ahead of projects that may have a higher priority. The LMS Steering Committee will work to maximize op- portunities for funding and will be called upon by the LMS Coordinator when circum- stances arise that require additional considerations to be made. The LMS Coordinator or designated representative will act as the committee facilitator. The committee’s primary function will be to review and act on recommendations with respect to its evaluation of mitigation initiatives and its ranking of the priorities for their implementation. Projects that may not have a BCR completed will not be considered for funding. Table 1: Miami-Dade LMS Project Benefit Cost Review Initiative Being Scored: Name of Appli- cant: Project Cost: Parameter Weighting Factor Scoring Criteria Score Points Suitability 30% 1 Appropriate- ness of the Measure 35% 5 - High: Reduces vulnerability and is consistent with Lo- cal Mitigation Strategy (LMS) goals and plans for future growth. 3 - Medium: Needed, but does not tie to identified vul- nerability. 0 - Low: Inconsistent with LMS goals or plans. 2 Vulnerability to Hazards 15% 5 - High: Project addresses 2 or more hazards, includes consideration for sea level rise impacts. 3 - Medium: Project addresses at least 2 hazards. 1 - Low: Project addresses one hazard. 3 Lifespan of mitigation measure and consideration of future risk 15% 5 - High: Expected to last\address hazards for 40 or more years. 3 - Medium: Expected to last\address hazards for 20-39 years. 1 - Low: Expected to last\address hazards less than 20 years 4 Environmental Impact 10% 5 - Positive effect on the environment. 3 - No effect - environmentally neutral. 0 - Adverse effect on the environment. 158 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 2: The Projects June 2018 P2-7 5 Consistent with Existing Legislation and/or Policies 10% 5 - High: Consistent with existing laws and policies. 3 - Medium: New legislation or policy changes needed, but no conflicts identified. 1 - Low: Conflicts with existing laws, regulations and/or policies, requires waivers. 6 Consistent with Existing Plans and Priorities 15% 5 - High - Consistent with existing plans and priorities. 3 - Medium - Somewhat consistent with current plans and priorities. 1 - Low - Conflicts with existing plans and priorities. Does not fit in with identified initiatives. Parameter Subtotal 100% sum of parameter scores; max = Suitability subtotal (sum of parameter scores) / (maximum possible score) 100% Parameter Weighting Factor Scoring Criteria Score Points Risk Reduction 55% 1 Scope of Bene- fits 15% 5 - High: Benefits multiple jurisdictions. 3 - Medium: Benefits more than half but not all of the municipalities and/or the unincorporated area. 1 - Low: Benefits less than half of the municipalities and/or the unincorporated area. 2 Potential to Protect or Save Human Lives 30% 5 - High: More than 1,000 lives. 3 - Medium: Up to 1,000 lives. 1 - Low: No lifesaving potential. 3 Supports Pro- tection of Crit- ical Infrastruc- ture or Conti- nuity of Essen- tial Services 20% 5 - High: Project will ensure continuity of operations for critical infrastructure or essential services for disaster re- sponse. 3 - Medium: Project will support critical infrastructure or essential services with loss/damage history. 1 - Low: Project will support infrastructure or services without loss/damage history. 0- Neutral - Project has no impact on community infra- structure or services. 4 Repetitive Damages Cor- rected 10% 5 - High: Alleviates repetitive loss. Property must have been damaged in the past by a disaster event. 3 - Medium: Repetitive loss may have occurred but was not documented. 1 - Low: No effect on repetitive loss. 159 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 2: The Projects June 2018 P2-8 5 Economic Ef- fect or Loss During Lifespan of the Project 10% 5 - Minimal economic loss (project improves resiliency of the community, does not increase risk of other adjacent areas/buildings.) 3 - Moderate economic loss (project may help minimize disruption and economic losses). 1 - Significant economic loss (project not likely to mini- mize economic impact of the community). 6 Number of People to Ben- efit 15% 5 - High: More than 100,000 people. 3 - Medium: 10,000 to 100,000 people. 1 - Low: Fewer than 10,000 people. Parameter Subtotal 100% sum of parameter scores; max = Risk Reduction Subtotal (sum of parameter scores) / (maximum possible score) 100% Parameter Weighting Factor Scoring Criteria Score Points Cost and Time 15% 1 Estimated Costs* 30% *(This score combines a weighted factor of Initial and Maintenance/Operating Costs) i. Initial Cost (including de- sign, project management, research…) 75% 5 - Low: $0 to $100,000. 3 - Moderate: $100,001 to $1 million. 1 - High: More than $1 million. ii. Mainte- nance/ Oper- ating (Annual/ Deployment) Costs 25% 5 - Lower costs: Less than 5% per annum of the intial cost. 3 - Moderate costs: 5-10% per annum of the intial cost. 1 - Higher costs: More than 10% annum of the intial cost. 2 Affordability 30% 5 - Good: Project is easily affordable. Has been budg- eted or a grant for this project is available and the likeli- hood of success is high. (If a match is needed, it is availa- ble.) 3 - Moderate: Project is somewhat affordable. Grants for this project are available and the likelihood of suc- cess is moderate. (If a match is needed, high confidence that it could be obtained.) 1 - Poor: Project is very costly for the agency. Grants for this project are limited. (If a match is needed, there may be difficulty in obtaining a match.) 160 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 2: The Projects June 2018 P2-9 3 Complexity of Implementa- tion 20% 5 - Low: This project is feasible, acceptable to most in the community, and does not require a public vote or hearing that may delay implementation. (Or has already been approved and accepted.) 3 - Moderate: This project is feasible, may have some opposition from the community and may require special- ized permitting or a public hearing or vote that may de- lay implementation. 1 - High: This project is feasible, may have some opposi- tion from the community, and will require either special- ized permitting, or a public hearing or vote that will de- lay implementation. 4 Completion Timeframe 20% 5 - High: 6 months or less from time of funding. 3 - Medium: 6 months to 1 year from time of funding. 1 - Low: more than 1 year from time of funding. Parameter Subtotal 100% sum of parameter scores: max = Cost Subtotal (sum of parameter scores) / (maximum possible score) 100% * Estimated costs are comprised of two secondary parameters: initial and maintenance/op- erating costs SUITABILITY 30% 100% RISK REDUCTION 55% 100% COST 15% 100% TOTAL 100% For a working Microsoft Excel worksheet of the LMS Prioritization Matrix send an e- mail request to: mdlms@miamidade.gov. 161 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 2: The Projects June 2018 P2-10 For further information please contact: Cathie Perkins LMS Coordinator 9300 NW 41st Street Miami, FL 33178 (305) 468-5400 Cathie.perkins@miamidade.gov mdlms@miamidade.gov website: http://www.miamidade.gov/fire/mitigation.asp 162 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 2: The Projects June 2018 P2-11 Appendix 1– Sample Project 163 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 2: The Projects June 2018 P2-12 164 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 2: The Projects June 2018 P2-13 Appendix 2– Deleted/Deferred Projects In 2017 the following projects were requested to be deleted or deferred by the stake- holder agencies identified. Action Agency Description Reason Deleted Miami Lakes Public Information and Edu- cation Removed per the request of agency Deleted Miami Lakes Traffic Control Removed per request of agency Deleted Miami Lakes Localized Drainage Improve- ments Removed per request of agency Deferred Miami Lakes Mary Collins Community Cen- ter Deferred for the time being 165 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 2: The Projects June 2018 P2-14 Appendix 3– Project List This list is maintained in WebEOC and updated by the individual agencies upon re- quest by the LMS Coordinator, two times a year by June 30 and December 31, re- spectively. The updated lists are published in July and January every year. The WebEOC LMS Board will be used to pull current information as needed. The county, municipalities and all other members of the LMS Working Group reserve the right to, at any time, add to, delete from and in other ways change the order of priorities pre- sented here. All entities participating in this program have agreed to undertake these initiatives, as necessary. 166 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Animal Services Doral Road/Drainage Project Future Unfunded Project Flood HMA 0.00 56 02/28/2018 TBD Private road behind facility has severe flooding which spills over into county vehicle parking area and back entrance to facility. Flooding has damage electric fence and limits access to facility since this is the main entry point for unloading animals. County Departments Aviation MIA South and Central Terminal Baggage Handling System Improvements Construction/Project Begun Sea Level Rise,Flood TSA OTA, FDOT Grants Future Financing - Identified Funding Source 324,210,000.00 69 02/22/2018 January 2021 This project scope includes the replacement of the entire in-line Checked Bag Screening System for South Terminal and installation of a new Checked Bag Screening System and Automated Sortation System for Central Terminal. This project will have three distinct phases: the building; the South Terminal Baggage Handling System upgrade; and the new Central Terminal Baggage Handling System. The new building will be approximately 60,000 square feet and will house both Checked Baggage Inspection Systems (CBIS) and Checked Baggage Reconciliation Areas (CBRA). Integrating a security screening system into the Baggage Handling System removes the baggage screening function from the ticketing areas, freeing valuable terminal space for circulation and improving the passenger flow. More importantly, the inline system removes the explosive detection operation from public areas into highly secured, segregated rooms that are equipped to deal with these high threat level scenarios providing a safer environment for the public. County Departments Community Action and Human Services Impact Window Installation Project in Planning Stage Wind HMA Identified Funding Source 175,000.00 64 03/01/2018 180 days The installation of 272 impact windows and doors. County Departments Community Action and Human Services Installation of a stand by generator Project in Planning Stage Power Failure HMA Identified Funding Source 55,000.00 72 03/01/2018 180 days Installation of a stand by generator County Departments Community Action and Human Services Installation of a Stand by Generator Project in Planning Stage Power Failure HMA Identified Funding Source 55,000.00 73 03/01/2018 180 days Installation of a stand by generator County Departments Community Action and Human Services Installation of Impact Windows and Doors Project in Planning Stage ,Wind HMA Identified Funding Source 200,000.00 67 03/01/2018 180 days Installation of impact windows and doors at a 55 unit residential facility County Departments Community Action and Human Services Installation of portable generators Project in Planning Stage Power Failure HMA Identified Funding Source 325,000.00 74 03/01/2018 180 days Installation of six stand by generators County Departments Corrections and Rehabilitation MAYA - Stationary Ramp Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge,Wind HMA 14,000.00 72 06/22/2018 12/31/2018 Install a stationary yard ramp in one of the bay doors to drive in and out of the warehouse County vehicles during storms to prevent loss of property. County Departments Corrections and Rehabilitation MWDC Exterior Mechanical Room Doors Project in Planning Stage Wind,Other CIP Identified Funding Source 250,000.00 85 02/21/2018 2019 Replace aging doors and frames to exterior mechanical rooms throughout the entire facility to maintain the security and safe operation of all air handler equipment. County Departments Corrections and Rehabilitation MWDC Generator Project in Planning Stage ,Health,Security Breach,Power Failure,Other CIP Identified Funding Source 1,000,000.00 89 02/21/2018 2019 To replace aging generators to support increased capacity needed to run chillers, all elevators, kitchen equipment and critical equipment. County Departments Corrections and Rehabilitation MWDC Roofs Project in Planning Stage ,Wind,Other,Healt h CIP Funding Secured 3.50 86 02/15/2018 2020 Replacement of roofs for all four building zones (wings) that are in need of replacement due to fair, wear and tear during its life span. Roof is in need of replacement. County Departments Corrections and Rehabilitation MWDC Window Replacement 50% complete ,Wind,Other,Healt h,Security Breach CIP Funding Secured 1,351,000.00 84 02/21/2018 2018 Replace existing defective detention grade security windows in all housing units and remainder of building that compromise security and permit moisture intrusion. County Departments Corrections and Rehabilitation PTDC Window Replacement & Ext Facade Project in Planning Stage ,Health,Wind,Oth er CIP Funding Secured 21,700,000.00 82 02/22/2018 2019 Replace existing defective detention grade security windows and repair exterior façade throughout the building to prevent security breach and water intrusion. County Departments Corrections and Rehabilitation TGK Recreational Yard Doors Project in Planning Stage ,Flood,Wind,Other ,Security Breach CIP Funding Secured 500,000.00 84 02/21/2018 2020 Replacement of the security doors accessing the recreation yards throughout all TGK housing units is needed. Due to the exposure to harsh outside environment, the metal on the doors and surrounding frames have severely deteriorated and have become a security risk County Departments Corrections and Rehabilitation TGK Roofs Project in Planning Stage ,Wind,Other,Healt h CIP Funding Secured 3.50 86 02/21/2018 2020 Replacement of roofs for all building zones that are in need of replacement due to fair, wear and tear during its life span. Roof is in need of replacement. County Departments Cultural Affairs African Heritage CAC - Building envelope sealing and painting Future Unfunded Project ,Wind Funding to be determined Identified Funding Source 90,000.00 0 03/01/2018 6 months from funding Pressure wash and seal/paint building envelope County Departments Cultural Affairs African Heritage CAC Parking Lot Improvements Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge Funding Source to be identified 125,000.00 50 03/02/2018 9 months from funding Parking lot drainage improvements: re-sloping, additional drains, etc. County Departments Cultural Affairs Caleb Auditorium - Building Envelope: Hurricane Impact systems Future Unfunded Project ,Wind Funding to be determined 350,000.00 60 03/02/2018 1 year after funding allocation Replace glass storefront, doors and windows with impact glass system/units County Departments Cultural Affairs Caleb Auditorium - Building Envelope: Sealing/Painting Future Unfunded Project ,Wind funding to be determined 120,000.00 51 03/02/2018 6 months from funding Pressure wash and seal building exterior County Departments Cultural Affairs Caleb Auditorium - Theater entrance walkways Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge Funding to be identified 75,000.00 66 03/02/2018 9 months from funding allocation Rework flooring elevations at entrances to theater to divert ponding water County Departments Cultural Affairs MDCA - Building envelope: Exterior sealing/paint Future Unfunded Project ,Wind Funding to be determined 150,000.00 67 03/02/2018 6 months from funding Exterior building cleaning, sealing/paint County Departments Cultural Affairs MDCA - Building Envelope: Impact Glass Systems Future Unfunded Project ,Wind Funding to be determined 1,350,000.00 63 03/02/2018 1 year after funding Replace storefront, glass block at stairwells, and all windows with impact glass units County Departments Cultural Affairs Miami-Dade County Auditorium Parking lot improvements Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge funding source to be determined 1,375,000.00 63 03/02/2018 1 year from funding Parking lot - new layout, drainage, resurfacing, sprinkler system, landscaping and LED lighting County Departments Cultural Affairs Parking lot improvements Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge PDM or other available grants Identified Funding Source 125,000.00 0 03/01/2018 9 months after funding Parking lot improvements including re-sloping, additional drains, etc. to improve drainage. County Departments Emergency Management Arnold and Edward Hall Connector Shelter Retrofit Future Unfunded Project Wind,Power Failure State Shelter Retrofit Identified Funding Source 220,000.00 80 5/30/2014 unknown Structural renovation to bring the facility up to current shelter code. Wall support and roof bracing improvements. The upgrade would allow the facility to stand up to the minimum code requirements for shelters as of today's code. Electrical upgrade for sustainability during use as an evacuation center/shelter. The upgrade would prepare the building is electrically ready for high demand. HVAC and generator upgrades for sustainability during use as an evacuation center/shelter. The upgrade would prepare the building's A/C system and provide a generator for current shelter requirements. County Departments Emergency Management Arnold Hall Shelter Retrofit Future Unfunded Project ,Power Failure,Wind State Shelter Retrofit Identified Funding Source 1,175,000.00 85 5/30/2014 1 Year from Start Structural renovation to bring this facility up to shelter code. This includes wall support and roof bracing improvements. Electrical upgrade for sustainability during use as an evacuation center/shelter. The upgrade would prepare the building is electrically ready for high demand. HVAC and generator upgrade would prepare the building's A/C system and provide a generator for current shelter requirements. 1 of 93 167 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Emergency Management Arnold Hall South Shelter Retrofit Future Unfunded Project ,Wind,Power Failure State Shelter Retrofit Identified Funding Source 615,000.00 80 5/30/2014 unknown Structural renovation to bring up to current shelter code. Wall support and roof bracing improvements will bring the structure up o the minimum shelter requirements of todays code. Electrical upgrade for sustainability during use as an evacuation center/shelter. The upgrade would prepare the building is electrically ready for high demand. NVAC and generator upgrades for sustainability during use as an evacuation center/shelter. The upgrade would prepare the building's A/C system and provide a generator for current shelter requirements. County Departments Emergency Management Arnold Hall South Shelter Retrofit Future Unfunded Project ,Power Failure,Wind State Shelter Retrofit Identified Funding Source 510,000.00 80 5/30/2014 unknown Structural renovation to bring the facility up to current shelter code. Includes wall support and roof bracing improvements. The upgrade would make the building stand up to the minimum shelter requirements of today's code. Electrical upgrade for sustainability during use as an evacuation center/shelter. The upgrade would prepare the building is electrically ready for high demand. HVAC and generator upgrades for sustainability during use an evacuation center/shelter. The upgrade would prepare the building's A/\c system and provide a generator for current shelter requirements. County Departments Emergency Management Barbara Goleman Senior Survey Funding Secured ,Wind State Retrofit Funding Identified Funding Source 0.00 89 6/12/2015 Less than one year from funding time perform a structural engineering survey to determine if the facility meets or exceeds ASCE-7 or ANSI A58 and determine what modifications are needed to meet or exceed the minimum wind design performance standards or equivalent. State Retrofit Funding to be utilized County Departments Emergency Management Coral Gables Senior Retrofit Study Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Wind State Shelter Retrofit Identified Funding Source 25,000.00 89 6/12/2015 Less than one year from funding time Engineering study to determine if facility meets or exceeds ASCE-7 or ANSI A58 and determine what modifications are needed to meet or exceed the minimum wind design performance standards or equivalent. State Shelter Retrofit monies to be utilized. County Departments Emergency Management Dade County Courthouse Air conditional equipment Future Unfunded Project ,Other Unknown 27,460,000.00 0 03/29/2018 Unknown Dade County Courthouse- Replace outdated air conditioning equipment. County Departments Emergency Management Edwards Hall Shelter Retrofit Future Unfunded Project ,Power Failure,Wind State Shelter Retrofit Identified Funding Source 1,215,000.00 85 5/30/2014 unknown Structural renovation to bring up to current shelter code. Wall support and bracing improvements. The upgrade would bring the facility up to today's shelter code requirements. Electrical upgrade for sustainability during use as an evacuation center/shelter. The upgrade would prepare the building is electrically ready for high demand. HVAC and generator upgrades for sustainability during use as an evacuation center/shelter. The upgrade would prepare the buildings' A/C system and provide a generator for current shelter requirements. County Departments Emergency Management Hialeah Miami Lakes Senior Retrofit Study Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Wind State Shelter Retrofit Identified Funding Source 25,000.00 89 6/12/2015 Less than one year from funding time Structural engineering study to determine if facility meets or exceeds ASCE-7 or ANSIA58 and determine what modifications are needed to meet or exceed the minimum wind design performance standards or equivalent. County Departments Emergency Management Miami Southridge Senior Retrofit Study Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge,Wind State Shelter Retrofit Identified Funding Source 25,000.00 89 6/12/2015 Less than one year from funding time Structural engineering survey to determine if facility meets or exceeds ASCE-7 or ANSI A58 and determine what modifications are needed to meet or exceed the minimum wind design performance standards or equivalent. State Shelter Retrofit funding to be used. County Departments Emergency Management Michael Kropp Window Protection Future Unfunded Project ,Wind State Shelter Retrofit Identified Funding Source 0.00 90 11/22/2016 unknown Add impact resistant windows to the gymnasium area of the site that is used as an Evacuation Center. Working with School Board to determine if this is feasible, state funding may be available for a portion of the costs. County Departments Emergency Management Reilly Coliseum Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Wind State Shelter Retrofit Identified Funding Source 1,175,000.00 85 5/30/2014 unknown Structural renovation to bring the facility up to current shelter code. Wall support6 and roof bracing improvements. The upgrade would bring the structure up to withhold the current code conditions for shelters. Electrical upgrade for sustainability during use as an evacuation center/shelter. The upgrade would prepare the building to be electrically ready for high demand. HVAC and generator upgrades for sustainability during use as an evacuation center/shelter. The upgrade would prepare the building's A/C system and provide a generator for current shelter requirements. County Departments Emergency Management South Miami Senior Retrofit Study Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge,Wind State Shelter Retrofit Identified Funding Source 25,000.00 89 6/12/2015 Less than one year from funding time Structural engineering survey to determine if facility meets or exceeds ASCE-7 or ANSI A58 and determine what modifications are needed to meet or exceed the minimum wind design performance standards or equivalent. County Departments Fire Rescue Miami-Dade Air Rescue South Security Hardening Future Unfunded Project ,Security Breach Potential Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Identified Funding Source 150,000.00 84 9/1/2016 1year Both Miami Executive and Opa-Locka airports are unable to provide adequate security for MDFR's multi-million dollar fleet of helicopters and associated equipment. Unauthorized members of the public have occasionally gained access to both sites which poses both a danger to their safety and MDFR's extremely valuable assets. County Departments Fire Rescue Miami-Dade Fire Rescue Station Rehabilitation for Air Rescue South Future Unfunded Project Wind HMPG, PDM Identified Funding Source 1,000,000.00 90 6/1/2009 Uknown This project will enhance the county's emergency response capabilities in responding to citizens' immediate disaster and medical needs. The project involves the actual hardening of the roof and structure as well as the hanger for Air Rescue apparatus. This hardening will enable the structure to meet regulatory requirements and withstand category four or five hurricanes for facilities which maintain rescue apparatus and valuable MDFR equipment. The average estimated value of the apparatus and equipment is $20 million. Estimated cost $1,000,000. County Departments Fire Rescue Miami-Dade Fire Station Roof Rehabilitation Future Unfunded Project Wind HMPG, PDM Identified Funding Source 600,000.00 88 6/1/2009 Unknown The project involves the actual hardening of the roof and structure to meet regulatory requirements and withstand category four or five hurricanes for facilities which maintain rescue engines, trucks and equipment, valuable personnel and computers. The average estimated value of the vehicles and equipment at these stations is $2,000,000. Estimated Cost: $ $600,000 County Departments Fire Rescue Structural Rehabilitation for Miami- Dade Fire Rescue Headquarters Future Unfunded Project Wind HMPG, PDM Identified Funding Source 1,000,000.00 95 6/1/2009 Unknown The project involves the retrofitting of various structural members of the Miami-Dade Fire Rescue Headquarters Building so that the scructure may withstand category four or five hurricanes. The average estimated cost: $1,000,000 County Departments Internal Services 30. Hardening of the windows at 140 Metro Flagler Building Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Wind HMA 2,985,000.00 0 03/29/2018 Unknown This is a typical downtown office building, housing approximately 125,000 square feet of office space. The first seven floors of the building are comprised of garage parking. The upper eight floors are the office floors with expansive windows. The height of the building would probably preclude shutters, but the windows could be replaced with impact resistant windows, or at a minimum strengthened with the application of impact resistant film. County Departments Internal Services Building Management System (BMS) Center Future Unfunded Project ,Power Failure,Security Breach,Other HMA 62,000.00 62 03/13/2018 Unknown Create redundancy for the BMS Control Center, which monitors remotely on a continuous 24-hour basis all electronic building management systems (BMS) located in the department’s main facilities. BMS systems are critical to all types of emergency response and post-event situations within these buildings, since they monitor and control fire alarms, smoke evacuation, air conditioning, and other critical systems throughout the buildings. The ability to maintain operational continuity through an event would enable critical systems to continue to be monitored and/or operated from a remote location, out of harm’s way. To establish the redundancy necessary to mitigate potential loss from a disaster scenario, the optimum solution would be to procure 12 laptop computers, an Apogee server and related communications software, which would enable restarting operations from one of two geographically disparate back-up locations, currently designated as the Regional Data Processing & Communications Center and the Elections Processing / 3-1-1 Answer Center. County Departments Internal Services Caleb Center Waterproofing/Damp- proofing Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Wind HMA 1,886,000.00 0 03/28/2018 Unknown Caleb Center - Waterproofing/Damp-proofing. County Departments Internal Services Carol Glassman center Impact Windows Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Wind HMA 165,000.00 0 03/28/2018 unknown Carol Glassman Daycare Center - Install Reflective High Impact Windows & Doors. 2 of 93 168 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Internal Services Central Support Control Center Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Power Failure,Technologi cal Disruption HMA 980,000.00 0 03/13/2018 Unknown Merge operations of the security central station with the building management system group and provide equipment for expanded security and BMS capabilities. Build the new control center at the Integrated Command Facility, a category 5 rated building, present location of Fire/Police 911 Dispatch and future location of EOC/DEM and 311 operations. The expanded role of the ISD control center will permit the monitoring of intrusion, fire, and other building related alarms through the use of updated technologies. Stations for other county departments to be provided as backups to their individual control centers (Water & Sewer, Seaport, Transit). County Departments Internal Services Central Support facility- Elevator improvements Future Unfunded Project ,Other HMA 1,710,000.00 0 03/28/2018 Unknow Central Support Facility - Code required elevator system improvements. County Departments Internal Services Coral Gables Courthouse drain repair to parking lot Future Unfunded Project ,Other HMA 352,000.00 0 03/29/2018 Unknown Coral Gables Courthouse - Repair & add a second drain to the parking lot for proper drainage. County Departments Internal Services Cultural center Elevatorimprovements Future Unfunded Project ,Other HMA 717,000.00 0 03/29/2018 Unknown Cultural Center Code required elevator system improvements. County Departments Internal Services Cutural Center main transformers Future Unfunded Project ,Power Failure HMA 193,000.00 0 03/29/2018 Unknown Cultural Center Replace main building transformers. County Departments Internal Services Dade County Courthouse domestic Future Unfunded Project ,Flood HMA 3,295,000.00 0 03/29/2018 Unknown Dade County Courthouse - Replace or repair domestic and sewer risers County Departments Internal Services Dade County Courthouse outdated Electrical Future Unfunded Project ,Power Failure HMA 5,750,000.00 0 03/29/2018 Unknown Dade County Courthouse - Replace additional outdated electrical. County Departments Internal Services Dade County Courthouse security and windows Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Wind HMA 575,000.00 0 03/29/2018 Unknown Enhanced security and hardening of the windows at the Historical Dade County Courthouse (DCC): The DCC is the main Civil Court in Miami-Dade County, it is a twenty seven-story high-rise building. Windows do not have film and it would provide additional protection County Departments Internal Services Data Processing Center Upgrade of electrical Panel Future Unfunded Project ,Other HMA 580,000.00 0 03/29/2018 Unknown Data Processing Center - Upgrade Electrical Panels and Static Switches. County Departments Internal Services Downtown Electrical Vaults Future Unfunded Project ,Other HMA 2,965,000.00 0 03/15/2018 Unknown All of the equipment needs to be updated. The electrical vaults are located at the Central Support Facility, SPCC, Dade County Courthouse, Cultural Center and the 140 W. Flagler building. County Departments Internal Services Downtown Govn. Center Power and cu Future Unfunded Project ,Other HMA 13,412,000.00 76 03/13/2018 Unknown The Downtown Government Center Central Plant was designed and once operated as a natural gas-fired, combined heat and power (CHP) plant providing electrical power and chilled water for several of the County's most critical facilities in downtown Miami. Due to operational and contractual problems, the power generation component of the plant was shut down and mothballed in 1994. Electricity is presently procured from the local utility and distributed to the downtown buildings, along with chilled water that is produced by electric chillers in the plant. As a result of the loss of the capacity to self-generate electrical power, the utility plant and the buildings served by the loop are vulnerable to power shortages or stoppages due to storm damage, terrorist attack or other emergency curtailments that might impact power substations, the power distribution system (the grid), or the nuclear power plant at Turkey Point. Initial planning studies affirm a reconfiguration and restart of the combined-cycle plant operation is highly viable. Sixteen buildings would ultimately benefit from the electricity and/or chilled water generated through this “restart” proposal, totaling over 4 million square feet, and utilized on a daily basis by some 20,000 occupants and visitors. This project would permit the Downtown Government Center complex to run independently of the local utility, thereby reducing the likelihood of downtime due to power outages at the utility. The local utility will still be connected to the plant, and serve as the backup power supply during downtime. The buildings impacted include some of the County’s most critical facilities, including County Hall, three primary County/State Courthouses (Family, Civil, and Juvenile Courts), two museums, the County’s Main Library, and several office low- and high-rise office buildings, along with two commercial clients (American Airlines Arena and the Terremark NAP of the Americas, an internet hub and technology center connecting North and South Americas. The cost cited for the project is the capital cost associated with the design, procurement and installation of the power generation equipment necessary to establish an 8.6-megawatt gas engine-based combined heat and power (CHP) plant. Primary equipment will consist of three 2.88 Megawatt engine generators and associated ancillary equipment. County Departments Internal Services Elections/311 Impact windows and shutters Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Wind HMA 1,050,000.00 0 03/29/2018 Unknown Elections/311 - Provide impact windows and automatic hurricane shutters County Departments Internal Services Electrical Redundancy to Central Support Facility and North District Chiller Plant Future Unfunded Project ,Other HMA 1,711,000.00 0 03/15/2018 Unknown Currently, the generators at both facilities are not able to provide sufficient backup power to run all of the equipment. If we lose power, none of the buildings cooled by wither plants will be serviced. County Departments Internal Services Emergency Generator Conversion Future Unfunded Project ,Other,Power Failure Unknown 1,427,000.00 80 03/13/2018 Unknown Extending runtime of emergency power generators, converting to burn both gas and diesel fuel: The purpose of this conversion is to facilitate - at a lesser cost - the extended operation of emergency generators in those facilities that already have natural gas lines. If installed, the conversion will allow diesel engines to burn both fuels at a ratio of 20 % diesel fuel, 80% natural gas. Diesel fuel will be depleted 5 times slower, allowing for an extended run time on the same fuel storage. If Natural Gas is not available, engines can still run on Diesel fuel at 100% ratio. This conversion is recommended for generators of 400 KW or larger capacity only, of which the agency currently has 23 units. County Departments Internal Services Emergency vehicle retrofit Future Unfunded Project ,Flood Grants 31,000.00 60 03/14/2018 Unknown The department’s emergency generator team services and maintains equipment at some 250 locations, including a large number of emergency response sites, such as fire and police stations, vehicle fueling sites, and antennas/repeater stations required for County radio systems. Many of these are located in either extremely remote or otherwise flood-prone areas. If any of these areas see water levels high enough to reach the engine air intake, the vehicles will not operate, stranding technicians and hindering emergency response activities. Engine modifications to provide a higher air intake will provide significantly increased “range” in a flooded area. County Departments Internal Services Enhanced security for Lawson Thomas Courthouse Future Unfunded Project ,Other Grants 276,000.00 56 03/13/2018 Unknown The Lawson E. Thomas Family Court Building is a thirty-story high-rise office building that serves as the sole location in Miami- Dade County housing State Family Court. As such, the existing CCTV system should be expanded to cover additional areas around the building and interior security electronic screening stations. Procure and install a screening machine for the screening of deliveries to the delivery area. County Departments Internal Services ENhanced security for ME Future Unfunded Project ,Other Grants 170,000.00 0 03/14/2018 Unknown TBC 3 of 93 169 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Internal Services Flood Barrier for Cultural Center Basement Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Wind FMA 94,000.00 64 03/13/2018 Unknown The Cultural Center houses the County’s Main Library, the Historical Museum of South Florida, and the Miami Art Museum. These key cultural institutions house both public and private collections. The basement and basement-level floors of the institutions provide delivery access to the facilities, storage for museum exhibit and library book collections, as well as key electrical, mechanical and elevator equipment rooms for the facility. The basement has one main service driveway that ramps down into the basement that should have a flood barrier installed to prevent substantial water intrusion from heavy rainfall and rising waters. The poor drainage in the surrounding streets makes flooding a very real potentiality. There is also a pedestrian entrance (with a door) on the north side of the building that leads into the basement, which should also be protected, since flooding occurs at that point as well. County Departments Internal Services Flood barriers for Richard E. Gerstein Justice Building Future Unfunded Project ,Flood FMA 183,000.00 84 03/13/2018 Unknown The Richard E. Gerstein Justice Building, the sole location of State Criminal Court in Miami-Dade County, and the primary site for Traffic Court, has two driveway entries into the basement, both of which have previously permitted flooding of the basement from the elevated storm water from the surrounding streets. This flooding has previously damaged, or has the potential to damage, electrical panels and equipment that are located flush or close to the basement floor, as well as equipment and systems located in the basement. Flood barriers should be installed at both entries, and critical equipment should be considered for elevation off the floor. County Departments Internal Services Flood prevention Central Support Future Unfunded Project ,Flood FMA 266,000.00 75 03/13/2018 Unknown This facility produces and/or distributes chilled water (air conditioning) and electricity to county buildings in the Downtown Government Center complex totaling in excess of 3,500,000 square feet, including County Hall, a State Civil Courthouse, a State Family Courthouse, a State Juvenile Courthouse, two museums, the main library, and other high-rise office towers and garages. The ground floor of the facility houses all electrical connections and inter-ties with the local utility, the main electrical panels being fed from underground at 13,800 V AC, 60 Hz and 480 V AC 60 Hz. In case of flooding, water can enter the main transformer vault, elevator pits, ground floor of the co-generation plant, and electrical switchgear rooms, where critical equipment lies to provide water to the cooling tower (52 feet height), and to the make-up water lines for chilled and condensing water loops, and for main power distribution to the Downtown Government Center complex. Storm drainage in the surrounding streets is extremely poor. Needed improvements include the installation of ground-level flood barriers, improved water extraction and/or the elevation of critical equipment within the facility. County Departments Internal Services Flood Prevention for North Distric Chiller Plant Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Wind FMA 247,000.00 0 03/15/2018 Unknown This facility produces and/or distributes chilled water (air conditioning) and electricity to county buildings in the North District Chiller Plant that provides chilled water to six county facilities (OTV N, OTV S, Children’s Courthouse, Courthouse Center, West Lot, Hickman Building) and two private clients (American Airlines Arena and Terremark Data Center). County Departments Internal Services Flood Prevention of Elevator Shaft Future Unfunded Project ,Flood Grants 107,000.00 54 03/13/2018 Unknown The Historical Museum of South Florida is located in the Cultural Center. Wind-driven rain, together with rainwater running down the roof, in heavy rainstorms can leak into the elevator shaft, and from there into the building through louvers, and into the ceiling plenum. A number of interior areas can be affected, which threatens public and private art collections housed in the building. This project would address these conditions. County Departments Internal Services Graham Building Access control and CCTV Future Unfunded Project ,Other Grants 250,000.00 0 03/29/2018 Unknown Graham Building - Replace aging access control system and CCTV equipment. County Departments Internal Services Graham Building Fence around State Attorney Future Unfunded Project ,Other Grants 700,000.00 0 03/29/2018 Unknown Graham Building - Install a fence around the State Attorney Building County Departments Internal Services Graham Building Roof Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Wind Grants 1,850,000.00 0 03/29/2018 Unknown Graham Building - Replace roof, exterior walls, and waterproof building. County Departments Internal Services Hardening Elections headquarterrs Building Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Wind Grants 1,455,000.00 67 03/13/2018 UNKNOWN Elections must have continuity even after natural disasters. Providing impact glass or accordion/roll down shutters will mitigate potential windstorm damage. Increasing the generator capacity will provide power to the complete elections process, giving the department the ability to continue the elections process after natural disasters. Enhancing the roof rating will help mitigate windstorm damage to the roof and all election equipment located in the warehouse area. County Departments Internal Services HArdening Perimeter of Data Processing Center DPCC Future Unfunded Project ,Wind,Flood Grants 890,000.00 75 03/13/2018 Unknown This facility serves as the County's primary computer operations center, and houses police and fire emergency dispatch (9-1-1). The facility is set well back from the surrounding streets, making the site ideal for providing optimum blast protection by means of a hardened property perimeter. The existing fenced perimeter should be reinforced by installing a hardened fence (with a raised concrete base) or a bollards/planter combination. Reinforce the two entry gates by installing popup bollards or hydraulic lift systems similar to the ones being used at the downtown Federal building. County Departments Internal Services Hardening perimeter Of Stephen P. Clark Future Unfunded Project ,Other Grants 2,680,000.00 0 03/14/2018 Unknown The SPCC is home to the County's Commissioners, Mayor, and most directors from the various departments. Reinforce the perimeter by installing a hardened fence or bollards/planter combination. Reinforce gates by installing popup bollards or hydraulic lift system similar to the ones being used at the Federal building downtown. Install surveillance system that includes cameras, recorders and additional lighting. County Departments Internal Services Hardening Windows at Lawson E. Thomas Courthouse Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Wind Grants 539,000.00 66 03/13/2018 Unknown The Lawson E. Thomas Family Court Building, the sole location housing State Family Court in Miami-Dade County, is a thirty-story high-rise building. The upper floors all have impact resistant glass; however, the first floor and mezzanine windows are extremely large, and manual shuttering from the outside is next to impossible. These windows should either have automatic shutters or impact resistant windows installed. This building also has a large patio on the eleventh floor. The windows around the patio and the doors leading out on the patio should be shuttered. County Departments Internal Services Hardening windows at north Dade Justice Center Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Wind grants 403,000.00 68 03/13/2018 Unknown This is a two-story building which consists of mostly glass exterior walls. The building is a heavily utilized branch court facility, serving the entire northern end of the county. The facility lies within two miles of the ocean, with no intervening barrier islands to mitigate the impact of high winds or storm surge. It would be extremely valuable to protect this facility, either through the installation of impact resistant windows or film, or with automatic shutters. County Departments Internal Services Hardening windows at Richard E. Gerstein Justice Building Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Wind Grants 3,321,000.00 57 03/13/2018 Unknown The Richard E. Gerstein Justice Building, the sole location of State Criminal Court in Miami-Dade County, and the primary site for Traffic Court, has two rows of large windows, with the bottom windows 4' in height, and the top windows 5' in height. There are approximately 500 windows on the upper eight floors. The first floor would require automatic roll down shutters ($300,000.00). Since the upper floors are already in need of a window replacement to address existing water intrusion and structural failures, the best solution would be to replace these upper floor windows with impact resistant glass. County Departments Internal Services Integrated Command Facility HVAC Future Unfunded Project ,Other grants 2,415,000.00 69 03/29/2018 Unknown Integrated Command Facility - HVAC Improvements County Departments Internal Services Integrated Command Facility Lighting Future Unfunded Project ,Other grants 2,610,000.00 0 03/29/2018 Unknown Integrated Command Facility - New Parking Lot and site Lighting County Departments Internal Services Integrated Command Facility Static Future Unfunded Project ,Other grants 3,550,000.00 0 03/29/2018 Unknown Integrated Command Facility - Replacement of PMM / Static Switches. 4 of 93 170 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Internal Services Integrated Command Facility Unimproved area roof Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Wind Grants 1,250,000.00 0 03/29/2018 Unknown Integrated Command Facility - Replace roof in unimproved area County Departments Internal Services Integrated Command Facility UPS Future Unfunded Project ,Power Failure grants 4,585,000.00 0 03/29/2018 Unknown Integrated Command Facility - Replacement of UPS Units County Departments Internal Services Lighting Towers Future Unfunded Project ,Power Failure grants 35,000.00 69 03/13/2018 Unknown After an emergency, it may be necessary to work with the assistance of portable high intensity discharge lights. Depending on location, needs and use, requirements may vary from 1.5 to 7KW, which may be satisfied by the use of several units of the same size. County Departments Internal Services Perimeter at Integrated Command Center Future Unfunded Project ,Security Breach grants 634,800.00 65 03/13/2018 Unknown This facility serves as the County's primary computer operations center, and houses police and fire emergency dispatch (9-1-1). The facility little set back from the surrounding streets, requiring a hardened property perimeter to properly protect the site. Installing a hardened fence (with a raised concrete base) or a bollards/planter combination will provide additional protection to this critical site. Reinforce entry gates by installing popup bollards or hydraulic lift systems similar to the ones being used at the downtown Federal building. County Departments Internal Services Perimeter of Medical Examiner's Future Unfunded Project ,Other grants 140,000.00 0 03/14/2018 Unknown Currently, the facility does not have complete access control. There are four wood gate arms controlling vehicle traffic in and out of facility. These should be replaced with a metal frame sliding gate that, when closed, would prevent not only vehicular, but pedestrian access to the property. The existing perimeter chain link fence should be replaced with an 8-foot high picket fence. County Departments Internal Services Portable Chiller Future Unfunded Project ,Other,Health grants 2,825,000.00 0 03/13/2018 Unknown Purchase of trailer-mounted portable chiller of 1200 Tons capacity, to provide emergency chilled water for air conditioning to disabled building(s) after a disaster, or major disruption in the building A/C system. Many of the current buildings in the inventory have been constructed for energy efficient operation, which has translated in recent years to a lack of direct access to the outside (i.e. reduced number and distribution of windows). The impact of this is that the buildings are rendered virtually unusable in the event that climate control is not available. We have a contractual obligation to supply chilled water to the American Airlines Arena if the North District Chiller Plant is out of service. County Departments Internal Services Portable Emerngency Generators Future Unfunded Project ,Other grants 4,565,000.00 85 03/13/2018 Unknown Purchase of three trailer-mounted, portable DIESEL emergency power generators, and made cable ready to provide emergency power to disabled facilities after a major disaster. Units are to be 300 KW, 60 Hz, 480/277/120 V, with fuel reserve of 470 gallons minimum of No. 2 diesel fuel. This set-up will provide an approximate continuous runtime of 24 hours (per generator, at full load). Work includes prepping buildings to accept quick connections from generators and necessary load transfers. Besides the units listed, two 2 MW units should be purchased. This will ensure that in the event of a long term power outage, facilities like SPCC can be supported. County Departments Internal Services Redundancy to Security Operations Center Future Unfunded Project ,Health,Other Unknown 33,000.00 63 03/13/2018 Unknown Create redundancy for the SOC which, on a continuous 24-hour basis, remotely monitors intrusion and fire alarms, and provides the related police/fire/security company dispatch, for over 500 installations. Alarm monitoring and first responder dispatch operations are critical to an effective emergency response strategy. The ability to maintain operational continuity through and after an event would enable the security of critical facilities to continue to be monitored from a remote location, out of harm’s way. To establish the redundancy necessary to reduce system downtime during emergency or disaster situations, the optimum solution would be to procure two laptop computers, three printers, four alarm receivers, appropriate software licenses, eight telephone lines, uninterrupted power supplies, and one fax machine, in order to restart operations from a remote backup location, currently designated as the Regional Data Processing & Communications Center and the Elections Processing / 3-1-1 County Departments Internal Services REG Enhanced Security Future Unfunded Project ,Health,Other grants 156,000.00 60 03/13/2018 Unknown The Richard E. Gerstein Justice Building, the sole location of State Criminal Court in Miami-Dade County, and the primary site for Traffic Court, is not as secure as it should be, given the criticality of its uses. Procure and install an electronic screening machine and walk-through magnetometer for the loading dock, to initiate the screening of personnel and oversized delivery packages that are not currently screened. County Departments Internal Services Removal of Obsolete Cooling Towers Future Unfunded Project ,Other grants 300,000.00 0 03/14/2018 Unknown The Lawson E. Thomas Family Courthouse Center is a thirty-story high-rise office building in the center of the downtown government center complex. The building has large rooftop cooling towers that are no longer in use. These need to be removed from the roof, along with the wind breaker panels surrounding them. Failing to do so exposes the building and adjacent street to significant damage in the event of the towers blowing off the building in high wind conditions. County Departments Internal Services Roof Integrated Command Center Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Wind grants 1,561,100.00 76 03/13/2018 ASAP Replace roof at the ICC that presently houses Miami-Dade County’s 911 Fire/Dispatch Center. This category 5 building will host the county’s Emergency Operations Center (EOC) or Department of Emergency Management (DEM), 311 Information Center, and possibly be the home for a fusion center County Departments Internal Services Safety Equipment for Emergency Inspection of Confined spaces Future Unfunded Project ,Other grants 176,000.00 0 03/14/2018 Unknown Provide “A” Frames, harnesses, life lines, lanyards, gas analyzers, SCBA apparatus, protective clothing, gas masks, ladders, human access/retrieval equipment, and hard hats for accessing flooded manholes, above-ground areas where diesel fuel tanks are installed, and other confined spaces in and around managed facilities. During and following natural or other disasters, it is common for natural gas or fuel lines to rupture, which will expose technicians having to access these areas to a harmful and potentially deadly environment. County Departments Internal Services Satelite phones Future Unfunded Project ,Health,Flood,Win d grants 107,000.00 73 03/13/2018 Unknown During an emergency, local telephone and radio services are very likely to be fully or partially disrupted, leaving key departmental staff unable to communicate with each other or a central command station. This will significantly hinder staff’s ability to respond in a timely, effective manner to emergency service calls, to call for parts needed for emergency repairs, or to secure needed assistance at sites impacted by the emergency. All field work will be so impacted, thus delaying the process of post-event damage assessment, site security in the short-term event aftermath, temporary and permanent site mobilizations, and service delivery coordination. Beyond the obvious functions of assessing and remediating facility damage, the department also employs emergency generator field technicians that support emergency generator equipment located in all areas of the county, including numerous emergency response facilities, e.g. fire and police stations, fueling sites, and antennas/repeater stations required for County radio systems, many of which are located in extremely remote difficult-to-access areas. The cost estimate includes the procurement of 32 “Iridium” based Motorola satellite phones, 5-year emergency service contracts for each phone, and miscellaneous necessary accessories of the phones. Equipment are initially anticipated to be utilized only in emergency situations, and through distribution to key ISD facility managers, key management personnel, and various field teams of emergency generator, security, elevator inspector, and building maintenance personnel. County Departments Internal Services South Dade Government Center Hurricane shutters Future Unfunded Project ,Wind,Flood grants 992,000.00 0 03/29/2018 Unknown South Dade Government Center - Hurricane Shutters County Departments Internal Services Stephen P. Clark Center Domestic riser Future Unfunded Project ,Other grants 1,875,000.00 0 03/29/2018 Unknown Stephen P. Clark Center - Replace domestic riser on tower section 5 of 93 171 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Internal Services Stephen P. Clark Center Elevators Future Unfunded Project ,Other grants 3,500,000.00 0 03/29/2018 Unknown Stephen P. Clark Center - Code required elevator system improvements and hi-rise system modernization County Departments Internal Services Stephen P. Clark Center main Transformers Future Unfunded Project ,Power Failure grants 295,000.00 0 03/29/2018 Unknown Stephen P. Clark Center - Replace main building transformers County Departments Internal Services Water redundancy for Central Support Facility Future Unfunded Project ,Other grants 921,000.00 0 03/15/2018 Unknown Plant. Currently, our only source of water is MDWASD. In the past, we have experienced very low water pressure from MDWASD resulting in not having sufficient water in our system to adequately cool buildings. We could eliminate this by having a backup water source (well, water tower, etc.) County Departments Libraries Allapattah to install impact resistant windows and Storefront Future Unfunded Project Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 110,000.00 60 11/6/2012 6 mos to 1 year The Allapattah branch of the Miami-Dade Public Library contains furniture, equipment and materials worth over $2,750,000.00. This building is of critical importance to the multi-ethnic and minority communities that it serves. This project will enable us to install impact resistant windows to withstand hurricane-level winds, as required by the new code, to secure the content of this building and on-going services provided to the communities served by this facility. Estimated cost: $110,000.00 County Departments Libraries Coconut Grove Branch Library installation of new roof and impact windows and storefront Funding Applied for ,Flood,Wind GOB and Identified FEMA Identified Funding Source 500,000.00 88 12/04/2017 2018 Libraries Coconut Grove Branch 2875 McFarlane Road, Miami, Fl. 33133 install impact windows $200,000 and replace entire roof $300,00 for a total of $500,000 Future Unfunded Project Wind Infrastructure (Building) Unknown/None $,500,000 61 The Coconut Grove branch of the Miami-Dade Public Library contains furniture, computers, equipment and materials worth over $19,000,000.00. This building is of critical importance to the multi-ethnic and minority communities that it serves. This project will enable us to install impact resistant windows and new roofing to withstand hurricane-level winds, as required by the new code, to secure the content of this building and on-going services provided to the communities served by this facility. Estimated cost: $500,000.00. County Departments Libraries Coral Gables reinforce the windows Future Unfunded Project Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 650,000.00 63 11/1/2012 6 mos to 1 year The Coral Gables branch of the Miami-Dade Public Library contains furniture, equipment and materials worth over $25,000,000.00. This building is also critical to emergency operations by serving, as the backup facility for the administration should the Main library be rendered inaccessible or inoperable due to an emergency. This project will enable us to reinforce the windows to withstand hurricane-level winds, as required by the new code, to secure the content of this building and on-going services provided to the communities served by this facility. Estimated cost: $650,000.00 County Departments Libraries Coral Reef to install impact resistant windows and Storefront Funding Applied for Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 150,000.00 60 11/6/2012 6 mos to 1 year The Coral Reef branch of the Miami-Dade Public Library contains furniture, equipment and materials worth over $2,750,000.00. This building is of critical importance to the multi-ethnic and minority communities that it serves. This project will enable us to install impact resistant windows to withstand hurricane-level winds, as required by the new code, to secure the content of this building and on-going services provided to the communities served by this facility. Estimated cost: $150,000.00 County Departments Libraries Culmer/Overtown to install impact resistant windows and Storefront Project in Planning Stage Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 125,000.00 60 11/5/2012 6 mos to 1 year The Culmer/Overtown branch of the Miami-Dade Public Library contains furniture, equipment and materials worth over $1,750,000.00. This building is of critical importance as a valued resource to the multi-ethnic and minority communities that it serves. This building is also of historical significance since it houses an early mural from the world renowned and award-winning African-American artist, Purvis Young, who was born and raised within the area of Culmer/Overtown. This project will enable us to install impact resistant windows to withstand hurricane-level winds, as required by the new code, to secure the content of this building and on-going services provided to the communities served by this facility. Estimated cost: $125,000.00 County Departments Libraries Duplicate remove this record North Central install impact windows Other Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 135,000.00 60 11/2/2012 6 mos to 1 year The North Central branch of the Miami-Dade Public Library contains furniture, equipment and materials worth over $1,850,000.00. This building is of critical importance to the multi-ethnic and minority communities that it serves. This project will enable us to install impact resistant windows to withstand hurricane-level winds, as required by the new code, to secure the content of this building and on-going services provided to the communities served by this facility. Estimated cost: $135,000.00 County Departments Libraries Kendall to install impact resistant windows and Storefront Funding Applied for Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 225,000.00 60 11/3/2012 6 mos to 1 year The Kendall branch of the Miami-Dade Public Library contains furniture, equipment and materials worth over $2,850,000.00. This building is of critical importance to the multi-ethnic and minority communities that it serves. This project will enable us to install impact resistant windows to withstand hurricane-level winds, as required by the new code, to secure the content of this building and on-going services provided to the communities served by this facility. Estimated cost: $225,000.00 County Departments Libraries Key Biscayne install impact windows and Storefront Future Unfunded Project Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 225,000.00 71 11/1/2012 6 mos to 1 year The Key Biscayne branch of the Miami-Dade Public Library contains furniture, equipment and materials worth over $2,750,000.00. This building is of critical importance to the multi-ethnic and minority communities that it serves. This project will enable us to install impact resistant windows to withstand hurricane-level winds, as required by the new code, to secure the content of this building and on-going services provided to the communities served by this facility. Estimated cost: $225,000.00 County Departments Libraries Lemon City install impact resistant windows and Storefront Future Unfunded Project Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 135,000.00 60 11/6/2012 6 mos to 1 year The Lemon City branch of the Miami-Dade Public Library contains furniture, equipment and materials worth over $2,000,000.00. This building is of critical importance as a valued to the multi-ethnic and minority communities that it serves. This project will enable us to install impact resistant windows to withstand hurricane-level winds, as required by the new code, to secure the content of this building and on-going services provided to the communities served by this facility. Estimated cost: $135,000.00 Project 13: North Central, Roof redesign and replacement County Departments Libraries Miami Lakes impact resistant windows and Storefront Funding Applied for Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 225,000.00 60 11/1/2012 6 mos to 1 year The Miami Lakes branch of the Miami-Dade Public Library contains furniture, equipment and materials worth over $2,850,000.00. This building is of critical importance to the multi-ethnic and minority communities that it serves. This project will enable us to install impact resistant windows to withstand hurricane-level winds, as required by the new code, to secure the content of this building and on-going services provided to the communities served by this facility. Estimated cost: $225,000.00 County Departments Libraries N. Dade Regional Impact Windows and Storefront Future Unfunded Project Multiple (specify in comments Column T) HMGP Identified Funding Source 650,000.00 65 11/1/2012 More than 1 year This project will enable us to install impact resistant windows to withstand hurricane-level winds, as required by the new code, to secure the content of this building and on-going services provided to the communities served by this facility. The North Dade Regional branch serves the municipalities of Miami Gardens, Opa Locka, and North Miami, as well as several communities within north Miami-Dade County. This 50,000 square foot facility serves as an important community resource offering library materials and services meeting the information and educational needs of these deserving communities. Department assets in this building are worth in excess of $40,000,000.00. This building is of critical importance to the multi-ethnic and minority communities that it serves. Estimated cost: $650,000.00 6 of 93 172 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Libraries South Dade Regional installation of Roof Replacement and impact windows Storefront Funding Applied for ,Flood,Wind Secured Identified Funding Source 1,150,000.00 82 12/04/2017 2018 Libraries South Dade Regional 10750 SW 211 Street, Miami, Fl. 33189 install impact windows $350,000 and replace entire roof $800,00 for a total of $1,150,000 Future Unfunded Project Wind Infrastructure (Building) Unknown/None $1,150,000 61 The South Dade Regional branch of the Miami-Dade Public Library contains furniture, computers, equipment and materials worth over $37,000,000.00. This building is of critical importance to the multi-ethnic and minority communities that it serves. This project will enable us to install impact resistant windows and new roofing to withstand hurricane-level winds, as required by the new code, to secure the content of this building and on-going services provided to the communities served by this facility. Estimated cost: $1,150,000.00. County Departments Libraries W. Dade Reg. install impact windows and Storefront Funding Applied for Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 850,000.00 61 11/1/2012 6 mos to 1 year The West Dade Regional branch of the Miami-Dade Public Library contains furniture, equipment and materials worth over $40,000,000.00. This building is of critical importance to the multi-ethnic and minority communities that it serves. This project will enable us to install impact resistant windows to withstand hurricane-level winds, as required by the new code, to secure the content of this building and on-going services provided to the communities served by this facility. Estimated cost: $850,000.00 County Departments Parks Biscayne Shores and Garden Park - Sea Level Rise Future Unfunded Project ,Sea Level Rise PDM & HMGP Identified Funding Source 950,100.00 88 6/24/2016 3 to 4 years Due to anthropogenic warming, Sea-Level is expected to rise 3 feet or more by the end of the 21st century. Add 2'H of Fill to coastal site. Please note, cost to replace/relocate existing asset is not included, this shall considered by the asset's lifecycle. County Departments Parks Black Point Park & Marina - Sea Level Rise Future Unfunded Project ,Sea Level Rise PDM & HMGP Identified Funding Source 7,452,000.00 88 6/24/2016 4 to 5 years Due to anthropogenic warming, Sea-Level is expected to rise 3 feet or more by the end of the 21st century. Add 2'H of Fill to coastal site. Please note, cost to replace/relocate existing asset is not included, this shall considered by the asset's lifecycle. County Departments Parks Black Point Park and Marina - Shrimper's Row Doc Reconstruction Future Unfunded Project ,Storm Surge PDM & HMGP Identified Funding Source 809,205.00 63 6/23/2016 1 year Reconstruction of docks to have code complied docks. County Departments Parks Camp Matecumbe - Shutters Future Unfunded Project Wind PDM & HMGP Identified Funding Source 387,062.00 63 Unknown > 1 year The PROS Department operates and maintains a total of 86 buildings in need of hurricane shutters to protect the buildings and their contents from future storm damage. Many of these buildings are recreation centers that are opened to the public as soon as possible after hurricanes to provide facilities for ice, water and food distribution, and places for safe child care until schools reopen. Without these window and door shutter projects, it is possible that wind forces and flying debris could cause damage to these facilities. County Departments Parks Camp Owassa Bauer - Shutters Future Unfunded Project ,Wind PDM & HMGP Identified Funding Source 53,920.00 63 1/15/2014 > 1 year Miami_Dade Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces (PROS) Department operates and maintains a total of 86 buildings in need of hurricane shutters to protect the building and their contents from future storm damage. Many of these buildings are recreation centers that are open to the public as soon as possible after hurricanes to provide facilities for ice, water and food distribution, and places for safe child care until schools reopen. Without these window and door shutter projects, it is possible that wind forces and flying debris could cause damage to these facilities. County Departments Parks Chapman Field Park - Sea Level Rise Future Unfunded Project ,Sea Level Rise PDM & HMGP Identified Funding Source 9,658,000.00 88 6/24/2016 4 to 5 years Due to anthropogenic warming, Sea-Level is expected to rise 3 feet or more by the end of the 21st century. Add 2'H of Fill to coastal site. Please note, cost to replace/relocate existing asset is not included, this shall considered by the asset's life cycle. County Departments Parks Charles Deering Estate - Sea Level Rise Future Unfunded Project ,Sea Level Rise PDM & HMGP Identified Funding Source 4,490,000.00 88 6/24/2016 4 to 5 years Due to anthropogenic warming, Sea-Level is expected to rise 3 feet or more by the end of the 21st century. Add 2'H of Fill to coastal site. Please note, cost to replace/relocate existing asset is not included, this shall considered by the asset's life cycle. County Departments Parks Charles Deering Estate - Sea Wall Land Waterfront Fortification Future Unfunded Project ,Sea Level Rise PDM & HMGP Identified Funding Source 2,200,000.00 84 6/23/2016 4 Raise sea wall due to sea rise. County Departments Parks Crandon Park - Sea Level Rise Future Unfunded Project ,Sea Level Rise PDM & HMGP Identified Funding Source 71,840,000.00 88 6/24/2016 10 years Due to anthropogenic warming, Sea-Level is expected to rise 3 feet or more by the end of the 21st century. Add 2'H of Fill to coastal site. Please note, cost to replace/relocate existing asset is not included, this shall considered by the asset's lifecycle. County Departments Parks East Greynolds Park - Sea Level Rise Future Unfunded Project ,Sea Level Rise PDM & HMGP Identified Funding Source 1,164,000.00 88 6/24/2016 3 to 4 years Due to anthropogenic warming, Sea-Level is expected to rise 3 feet or more by the end of the 21st century. Add 2'H of Fill to coastal site. Please note, cost to replace/relocate existing asset is not included, this shall considered by the asset's lifecycle. County Departments Parks Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden - Sea Level Rise Future Unfunded Project ,Sea Level Rise PDM & HMGP Identified Funding Source 10,310,000.00 88 6/24/2016 4 to 5 years Due to anthropogenic warming, Sea-Level is expected to rise 3 feet or more by the end of the 21st century. Add 2'H of Fill to coastal site. Please note, cost to replace/relocate existing asset is not included, this shall considered by the asset's lifecycle. County Departments Parks Greynolds Park - Sea Level Rise Future Unfunded Project ,Sea Level Rise PDM & HMGP Identified Funding Source 18,670,000.00 88 6/24/2016 6 years Due to anthropogenic warming, Sea-Level is expected to rise 3 feet or more by the end of the 21st century. Add 2'H of Fill to coastal site. Please note, cost to replace/relocate existing asset is not included, this shall considered by the asset's lifecycle. County Departments Parks Haulover Park - Sea Level Rise Future Unfunded Project ,Sea Level Rise PDM & HMGP Identified Funding Source 21,390,000.00 88 6/24/2016 6 years Due to anthropogenic warming, Sea-Level is expected to rise 3 feet or more by the end of the 21st century. Add 2'H of Fill to coastal site. Please note, cost to replace/relocate existing asset is not included, this shall considered by the asset's lifecycle. County Departments Parks Homestead Bayfront Park - Sea Level Rise Future Unfunded Project ,Sea Level Rise PDM & HMGP Identified Funding Source 4,649,000.00 88 6/24/2016 4 to 5 years Due to anthropogenic warming, Sea-Level is expected to rise 3 feet or more by the end of the 21st century. Add 2'H of Fill to coastal site. Please note, cost to replace/relocate existing asset is not included, this shall considered by the asset's life cycle. County Departments Parks Lakes by the Bay Park - Sea Level Rise Future Unfunded Project ,Sea Level Rise PDM & HMGP Identified Funding Source 1,112,000.00 88 6/24/2016 3 to 4 years Due to anthropogenic warming, Sea-Level is expected to rise 3 feet or more by the end of the 21st century. Add 2'H of Fill to coastal site. Please note, cost to replace/relocate existing asset is not included, this shall considered by the asset's life cycle. 7 of 93 173 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Parks Matheson Hammock Park - Sea Level Rise Future Unfunded Project ,Sea Level Rise PDM & HMGP Identified Funding Source 12,990,000.00 88 6/24/2016 6 years Due to anthropogenic warming, Sea-Level is expected to rise 3 feet or more by the end of the 21st century. Add 2'H of Fill to coastal site. Please note, cost to replace/relocate existing asset is not included, this shall considered by the asset's lifecycle. County Departments Parks PWD Project No. 20120053 (CSWY)Other ,Flood/Storm Surge CSWY Funding Secured 5,518,423.00 0 5/12/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED The improvements to Hobie Island, north side, consist of coastal processes and shoreline design, beach profiling, site development, parking improvements, paving, grading and drainage design, signage and pavement markings, landscape design, environmental permitting, and post-design services during the construction phase of the project. County Departments Parks R. Hardy Matheson Preserve - Sea Level Rise Future Unfunded Project ,Sea Level Rise PDM & HMGP Identified Funding Source 5,893,000.00 88 6/24/2016 4 to 5 years Due to anthropogenic warming, Sea-Level is expected to rise 3 feet or more by the end of the 21st century. Add 2'H of Fill to coastal site. Please note, cost to replace/relocate existing asset is not included, this shall considered by the asset's life cycle. County Departments Parks Sea Wall Replacement and Repair - Crandon Marina Future Unfunded Project Sea Level Rise Florida Coastal Management Program Identified Funding Source 12,989,700.00 61 Unknown > 1 year Crandon Marina- restore or replace 1,680 linear feet of seawall in the marina wet slip basin. Removed , reset and relocate existing flooding docks as needed. Estimated cost $12,989,700.00 County Departments Parks Sea Wall Replacement and Repair - Haulover Marina Future Unfunded Project Sea Level Rise Florida Inland Navigation District, Florida Boating Improvement Program and Coastal Partnership Management Enterprise Identified Funding Source 2,465,100.00 69 Unknown > 1 year Haulover Marina - restore or replace 575 linear feet of seawall in Baker's Haulover Cut connecting the Intra Coastal Waterway and the Atlantic Ocean, estimated cost $2,465.100 County Departments Parks Sea Wall Replacement and Repair - Matheson Hammock Marina Future Unfunded Project Sea Level Rise Florida Inland Navigation District, Florida Boating Improvement Program and Coastal Partnership Management Enterprise Identified Funding Source 4,245,750.00 71 Unknown > 1 year Matheson Hammock Marina - restore or replace 675 linear feet of seawall in marina wet slip basin, estimated cost $4,245,750 County Departments Parks Sea Wall Replacement and Repair - Pelican Harbor Marina Future Unfunded Project Sea Level Rise Florida Inland Navigation District, Florida Boating Improvement Program and Coastal Partnership Management Enterprise Identified Funding Source 1,491,750.00 71 Unknown > 1 year Pelican Harbor Marina - restore or replace 115 linear feet of seawall in the marina wet slip basin. Repair boat ramp as needed. Estimated Cost $1,492,750 County Departments Parks Tree Island Park & Preserve Park Development Future Unfunded Project ,Flood PDM & HMGP Identified Funding Source 180,000.00 57 6/23/2016 1.5 years Environmental Mitigation, Natural Area Restoration, Drainage. County Departments Parks Tropical Park Boxing Center - Shutters Future Unfunded Project ,Wind PDM & HMGP Identified Funding Source 44,341.00 63 1/15/2014 6 mos to 1 year Miami_Dade Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces (PROS) Department operates and maintains a total of 86 buildings in need of hurricane shutters to protect the building and their contents from future storm damage. Many of these buildings are recreation centers that are open to the public as soon as possible after hurricanes to provide facilities for ice, water and food distribution, and places for safe child care until schools reopen. Without these window and door shutter projects, it is possible that wind forces and flying debris could cause damage to these facilities. County Departments Parks Virgina Key - Sea Level Rise Future Unfunded Project ,Sea Level Rise PDM & HMGP Identified Funding Source 4,905,000.00 88 6/24/2016 4 to 5 years Due to anthropogenic warming, Sea-Level is expected to rise 3 feet or more by the end of the 21st century. Add 2'H of Fill to coastal site. Please note, cost to replace/relocate existing asset is not included, this shall considered by the asset's lifecycle. County Departments Parks West Kendal District Park - Phase 1B Lake Excavation and Stockpiling Future Unfunded Project ,Flood PDM & HMGP Identified Funding Source 432,000.00 57 6/24/2016 1.5 years Installation of limited civil infrastructure for Phase 1 development. County Departments Parks Zoo Miami Waste Water and Storm water Discharge Remediation Future Unfunded Project ,Flood PDM & HMGP Identified Funding Source 7,600,000.00 61 6/24/2016 2 years Installation of a drainage system to filtrate waste water and storm water discharge from the exhibits ponds. County Departments Police Drainage at PCB Future Unfunded Project ,Flood Potential funding source to be identified Identified Funding Source 1,000,000.00 77 02/13/2018 24 months Drainage infrastructure improvements at PCB County Departments Police MDPD Bullet Resistant Upgrades Future Unfunded Project ,Health,Security Breach,Technologi cal Disruption Potential Funding Source, UPDATE: Leased building, potential issues with renewal Identified Funding Source 200,000.00 75 10/31/2016 12 months Research, Planning, Design, Specifications, Construction Documents, Permitting, Construction and Construction Administration to include: Renovate the Sexual Predator Registration Public Waiting Areas with bullet resistant materials in order to achieve maximum protection to the employees. The renovations will include the replacement of the existing doors, transaction windows, as well as the alteration of the waiting area perimeter walls to comply with bullet resistant requirements, level 8 protection. A new ADA access ramp adjacent to the main entry and a new ADA door actuator will also be included in the estimate. County Departments Police MDPD Facilities Maintenance South Office Roof Replacement and Reinforcement Construction/Project Begun Wind Potential Funding Secured 257,000.00 89 12/1/2012 12 months The Replacement/Reinforcement of the roof at MDPD's Facility Section South Office: this facility was constructed years before stringent code requirements. The existing materials are inferior and are currently damaged which will not withstand in the event of a disaster. The facility will have the existing roof removed and replaced with upgraded materials to meet regulatory requirements and withstand manmade and natural disasters. In addition, windows and doors will be replaced or reinforced, hardening the entire structure. This facility houses three vital police units: Community Service, Nuisance Abatement, and most important, Facilities Maintenance. If the roof is compromised due to storm or other event, these three units would have to be relocated. This relocation would be costly. Also, with regard to facilities maintenance, the ability to respond to maintenance needs at police district stations would be impacted, which could affect police services. 8 of 93 174 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Police MDPD Headquarters' Computer Lab Transfer Switches and Connections Future Unfunded Project Communications Failure,Technologi cal Disruption Potential - check with ITSB 300,000.00 90 12/1/2012 12 months Electrical installation of two (2) 400A non-automatic transfer switches to connect a portable generator to provide back-up emergency power to the facility's Computer lab UPS and the associated air conditioning in the room. Both transfer switches will be tied into one (1) 800A panel. The installation shall also include the generator connection box and plugs located in the northeast rear parking area with an approximate of 100' of extra cabling for the generator connection. The intent of this installation is to allow for the connection of a portable generator in the event that the facility's standby generator is nonoperational. While this would not power the HQ building (lights, air conditioning, etc.), it would power the information systems, a primary tool for daily policing. County Departments Police Miami-Dade Police Department - Installation of Offsite Disaster Recovery Equipment for MDPD Network Future Unfunded Project Flood,Power Failure,Security Breach,Technologi cal Disruption,Wind Potential Identified Funding Source 134,000.00 90 1/15/2014 12 months Installation of equipment necessary to create an offsite disaster recovery/mitigation location for the Miami-Dade Police Department (MDPD) Network. This additional location will allow for operation of the network from two different sites if the regular network is compromised due to communication/power failure, flood, terrorist attack, or hurricane. In cases of weather related damage or man-made attack, police services will become even more essential and an immediate response will limit further damage to the Miami-Dade County area. The operation of the MDPD network is the foundation for day-to-day operations since all operations are now technology-based. This alternate network site will also serve as the Sharepoint, Homeland Security, and Criminal Justice Information backup sites ensuring that police investigative data is protected in the event of a weather event or attack. A back-up system for our network will also allow for continued sharing of information with our law enforcement partners – local, state, and federal. County Departments Police Roof Upgrades to Various MDPD Facilities Future Unfunded Project ,Wind Funding to be identified Identified Funding Source 1,100,000.00 87 02/13/2018 24 months Roof upgrades to mitigate against future natural hazards County Departments Police Storm Windows for Police District Stations Future Unfunded Project ,Wind Funding source to be identified Identified Funding Source 0.00 0 02/13/2018 24 months TBD County Departments Police Stormshield Barriers for MDPD HQ Complex Future Unfunded Project ,Wind Potential funding source to be identified Identified Funding Source 850,000.00 92 02/13/2018 12 months TBD County Departments Police Upgrade MDPD Back-up Communications Center Future Unfunded Project ,Technological Disruption Potential Funding Source to be identified. Identified Funding Source 1,525,000.00 87 02/13/2018 24 months e911 funds can be used to supplement the project costs up to $1.025M. Additional funding of $500K still not identified. County Departments Public Housing and Community Development A. Coleman Gardens Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 1,890,000.00 87 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development A. Coleman Gardens Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 2,205,000.00 75 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development A. Coleman Gardens Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 1,296,000.00 92 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Abe Arronovitz Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 247,500.00 91 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Arthur Mays Village Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 16,560,000.00 78 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Biscayne Plaza Future Unfunded Project Wind,Power Failure HMGP Grant Applied For 1,037,366.00 82 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Replacement of all existing windows with impact resistant windows ans installation of a full capacity generator. County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Buena Vista Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 60,000.00 81 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Culmer Gardens Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 675,000.00 79 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Culmer Place Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 1,359,000.00 80 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Edison Courts Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 3,105,000.00 86 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Edison Plaza Future Unfunded Project Wind HMGP Grant Applied For 1,196,460.22 81 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Emmer Turnkey Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 189,000.00 88 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Falk Turnkey Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 216,000.00 72 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development FHA Scattered Homes Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 189,000.00 96 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Florida City Family Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Identified Funding Source 234,000.00 81 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Florida City Gardens Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 225,000.00 82 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Goulds Plaza Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 225,000.00 75 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Green Turnkey Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 189,000.00 77 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Grove Homes Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 216,000.00 77 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Gwen Cherry 05 Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 738,000.00 85 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Gwen Cherry 06 Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 72,000.00 88 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Gwen Cherry 07 Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 288,000.00 86 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes 9 of 93 175 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Gwen Cherry 09 Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 72,000.00 87 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Gwen Cherry 11 Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 180,000.00 91 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Gwen Cherry 20 Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 103,500.00 77 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Gwen Cherry 22 Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 90,000.00 74 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Gwen Cherry 23 Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 324,000.00 83 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Gwenn Cherry 08 Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 189,000.00 75 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Gwenn Cherry 12 Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 54,000.00 86 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Gwenn Cherry 13 Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 279,000.00 80 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Gwenn Cherry 14 Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 702,000.00 88 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Gwenn Cherry 15 Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 252,000.00 89 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Gwenn Cherry 16 Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 630,000.00 76 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Heritage Village II Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 234,000.00 85 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Highland Park Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 468,000.00 88 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Homestead Gardens Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 1,350,000.00 76 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Homestead Village Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 99,000.00 83 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Homestead West Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 135,000.00 80 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Joe Moretti Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 2,592,000.00 77 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Jose Marti Plaza Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 247,500.00 100 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Kline-Nunn Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 1,051,693.00 83 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes - windows and doors County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Lemon City Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 450,000.00 75 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Liberty Homes Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 396,000.00 96 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Liberty Square Funding Secured Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Awarded 2,916,000.00 0 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Liberty Square Funding Secured Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Awarded 3,240,000.00 0 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Liberty Square Funding Secured Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Awarded 3,000,000.00 0 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Little Havana Homes Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 252,000.00 80 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Little River Pl.Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 387,000.00 82 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Little River Terr.Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 972,000.00 92 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Manor Park Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 288,000.00 78 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Martin Fine Villas Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 225,000.00 82 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Model Cities Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 342,000.00 73 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Moody Gardens Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 153,000.00 80 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Moody Village Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 576,000.00 89 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Naranja Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 568,400.00 86 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Opa-Locka Eld.Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 225,000.00 96 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Orchard Villa Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 108,000.00 77 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Palm Court Future Unfunded Project Wind,Power Failure HMGP Identified Funding Source 1,403,162.82 79 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Replacement of all existing windows with new impact resistant windows and installation of a full capacity generator. 10 of 93 176 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Palm Towers Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 463,500.00 77 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Palmetto Gdns Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 180,000.00 93 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Parkside Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 252,000.00 85 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Perrine Elderly Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 90,000.00 84 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Phyllis Wheatley Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 180,000.00 82 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Pine Island I Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 720,000.00 94 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Pine Island II Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 450,000.00 78 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development R.K.H. Towers Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 1,323,000.00 73 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Rainbow Village Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 900,000.00 95 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Richmond Homes Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 288,000.00 100 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Santa Clara Homes Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 117,000.00 78 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Scattered Sites Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 450,000.00 82 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Scattered Sites Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 72,000.00 89 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Scattered Sites Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 216,000.00 90 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development So Miami Plaza Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Awarded 436,500.00 79 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development South Miami Gardens Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 522,000.00 77 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Southridge I Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 684,000.00 82 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Southridge II Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 270,000.00 81 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Three Round Towers Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 1,200,000.00 90 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Three Round Towers Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Awarded 450,000.00 75 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Three Round Towers Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 409,500.00 80 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Twin Lakes Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 342,000.00 83 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Venetian Gdns.Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 468,000.00 73 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Victory Homes Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 1,494,000.00 100 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development W. Homestead Gardens Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 54,000.00 76 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Wayside Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 270,000.00 82 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Wynwood Eld.Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 324,000.00 69 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Housing and Community Development Wynwood Homes Future Unfunded Project Wind CAPITAL FUND Grant Applied For 175,500.00 97 6/10/2013 UNKNOWN Windstorm Protection from hurricanes County Departments Public Schools SW 165 Ave and SW 88 St 75% complete ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 66,000.00 0 5/18/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Public Schools SW 82 ST from SW 73 Ave to SW 76 Ave Construction/Project Begun ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 304,884.00 0 5/20/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources "NW 72 Street from NW 8 Avenue to NW 10 Avenue Drainage Improvement Project" Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 300,000.00 0 5/3/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources 10130 SW 91 Terrace Funding Secured ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 25,000.00 0 6/30/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints 11 of 93 177 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources 1325 SW 103 Pl Westbrook Park Funding Secured ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 52,618.90 0 6/30/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources 1851 NW 46 ST Other ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU FUNDING CAPITAL PROJECT Funding Secured 55,000.00 0 2/17/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED Mitigation of Repetitive Losses and flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources 20130158Drainage Improvement Project - SW 99 Ave & SW 101 St;SW 129 AVE & SW 116 ST Construction/Project Begun ,Flood/Storm Surge Unknown Funding Secured 0.00 0 2/18/2016 fISCAL YEARS 2017 Mitigation of Repetitive Losses and flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources 32nd Street Breakwater Rehabilitation and Stabilization Future Unfunded Project Flood Unknown 800,000.00 0 12/1/2012 on-going maintenance needs In 2002, Miami-Dade County constructed a series of three breakwater structures in the vicinity of 32nd Street in Miami Beach to stabilize a highly erosion susceptible area and maintain a protective beach. While the project has performed well, recent hurricanes have resulted in the movement and settlement of the boulders used to construct the breakwaters. This movement has altered the original design, and may compromise the protective functions of the breakwaters during future storm events. Rehabilitation and stabilization of the structures will enhance their ability to protect the adjacent shorelines. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources 7250 SW 13 Street 75% complete ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 185,000.00 0 2/18/2016 Fiscal Year 2016 Mitigation of Repetitive Losses and flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources ALLEY NE 167 St and NE 7 Ave Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 83,832.00 0 3/26/2015 2 years after project funding is secured General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Arch Creek Phase IV- Pump Stations Improvements Construction/Project Begun ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 120,000.00 0 2/22/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED Pump Stations Improvements County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Beach and Dune Restoration and Maintenance Future Unfunded Project Wind Unknown 3,200,000.00 0 12/1/2012 on-going maintenance needs The majority of Miami-Dade County's beach areas have been restored to provide storm protection to coastal development and recreational areas for residents and tourists. Several localized segments of the beach located at approximately 29th, 44th, and 55th Streets in Miami Beach have been susceptible to erosion, Due to the narrow beach width and lowered elevation in these areas, even minimal storm events can result in impacts to the dune system and beachfront infrastructure. Re-nourishment of these areas would provide a protective buffer during storms, and reduce impacts to adjacent beach areas. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Bird Road and SW 128 Avenue Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge None 0.00 0 6/30/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Boat Basin Canal Dredging (NW N. River Dr and NW 32 ST) Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 267,000.00 0 2/22/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED Boat Basin Canal Dredging County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources C-1 Extension, at SW 152 ST, from SW 177 AVE to SW 157 AVE Future Unfunded Project Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge Grant Funding Secured 6,000,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured New Canal County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources C-100 Outfall Retrofit between SW 140 St and SW 152 St Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 283,500.00 0 2/22/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED C-100 Outfall Retrofit County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources C-103N EXTENSION CANAL (From SW 240 St to SW 268 St) Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 10,200,000.00 0 5/4/2015 2 years after project funding is secured New Canal/Floodway Improvement (No canal reservation exists land acquisition may be required) County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources C-113 Extension Future Unfunded Project Flood Unknown 2,230,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured New Canal, running through this approximate location: from SW 14 AVE & SW 6 ST to SW 197 AVE & SW 314 ST County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Construction of New Breakwater Structure in the Vicinity of FDEP R- Monument 60 Future Unfunded Project Flood grants Identified Funding Source 3,000,000.00 0 12/1/2012 2 years after project funding is secured This project proposes to design and construct a submerged breakwater structure consistent with the alternatives presented in the study, �Alternatives for 32nd Street Breakwater, Post Buckley Schuh & Jernigan (PBS&J), November 2008 Study�, and will include the removal of the existing southernmost breakwater located at State R-Monument R-60, and the construction of sand impoundment berm (minimum 30,000 cubic yards). The design of the proposed breakwater will take into account the following objectives: A. Rubble-mound breakwater with protective stone material B. A life span of 50 years C. Design procedures according to Coastal Engineering Manual or Shore Protection Manual, Coastal Engineering Research Center, USACE, 1985, 2005; that will include: A. Verification of the recommended length and offshore distance of the proposed breakwater (246.1 FT and 467.1 FT, respectively) by utilizing approximate calculation methods for tombolos and down drift performance (Bodge 1998, Silvester and Hsu 1993, Moreno and Klaus 1999, etc.) B. Stillwater Elevation will be MHW, MSL, and MLW calculated from near- most NOAA stations C. Design height of proposed breakwater structure and wave period determination shall be based on historical data from USACE and NOAA stations (hindcasting) D. Dimensions and weight of boulders shall be dependent on the depth of the surrounding waters and their ability to reduce wave energy E. Post Construction Monitoring Plan County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Country Lake Manors Drainage Improvement Project (Phase II) – NW 202 Street to NW 199 Street from NW 57 Avenue to NW 67 Avenue Drainage Other ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 542,480.00 0 2/22/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED Mitigation of Repetitive Losses and flood complaints 12 of 93 178 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Country Lakes Manors Drainage Improvement Project - NW 198 Terrace from NW 64 Court to NW 62 Place Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 214,219.00 0 2/23/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED Mitigation of Repetitive Losses and flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Culvert and Canal Improvements along SW 122 Avenue from SW 202 ST to the C-1W Project in Planning Stage Flood/Storm Surge SWU 2,500,000.00 0 5/4/2015 Unknown Replace the existing low level bridges at SW 200 202 206 and 194 St and replace the existing slab covered canal from SW 208 Street to the C-1W with a pipe culvert. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Drainage Conveyance Line and Emergency Overflow PWD Project No. 20130253 Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 35,000.00 0 2/23/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED Mitigation of Repetitive Losses and flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Drainage Improvement Caribbean BLVD Bridge at the C1N Canal Crossing Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 3,025,000.00 0 2/23/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED Drainage Improvement County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Drainage Improvement Project (PWD Project No. 20090162) (SWU)Funding Secured ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 488,000.00 0 2/23/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED Drainage Improvement County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Drainage Improvement Project (PWD Project No. 20130013) (SWU) Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 127,154.00 0 2/23/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED Drainage Improvement County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Drainage Improvement Project (PWD Project No. 20130243) (GOB 77451)Other ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB 77451 Funding Secured 170,866.00 0 2/23/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED Drainage Improvement County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Drainage Improvement Project (PWD Project No. 20130252) (GOB 77466) Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB 77466 Funding Secured 874,000.00 0 2/23/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED The work shall consist of installing drainage structures, exfiltration drains, grading, sodding, roadway restoration including construction of concrete curb and gutters, and sidewalks, as applicable, where drainage was installed County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Drainage Improvement Project (PWD Project No. 20130263) (GOB 77454) Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB 77454 Funding Secured 700,000.00 0 2/23/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Drainage Improvement Project Multiple Sites (SW 95 Ave from SW 159 ST to SW 160 ST) Open Contract Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 105,156.00 0 2/23/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Drainage Improvement Project PWD Project No. 201302256 GOB 77414 Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 130,000.00 59 1/15/2014 F.Y. 2014-15 The design of the above site shall include, but is not limited to all operation necessary to raise the areas drainage to meet County standards. The work shall consist of installing drainage structures, exfiltration drains, grading, sodding, roadway restoration including construction of concrete curb and gutters, and sidewalks, as applicable, where drainage was installed. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Drainage Improvement PWD Project No. 20120161) (QNIP)75% complete Flood/Storm Surge QNIP Funding Secured 189,372.00 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Drainage Improvement PWD Project No. 20130156) (GOB/SWU) Construction/Project Begun ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB/SWU Funding Secured 632,910.00 0 2/24/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Drainage Improvements to the Seaboard Acres Ditch Project in Planning Stage Flood to be determined by RER (Select)2,000,000.00 68 12/1/2012 The Seaboard Acres Ditch is a drainage ditch located within the city of North Miami and unincorporated Miami-Dade County. The area it serves chronically floods, severely impacting residents in the area. The proposed project would enlarge the piping system currently in place and dredge the remaining open ditch. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources East Westchester Drainage Improvement Project Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 1,500,009.00 0 2/24/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Flagler St to NW 7 St between Palmetto Exp and NW 72 Ave (CNW-W- 1), NW 6 St to SW 8 St between SW 127 Ave and Fl Turnpike (CC4-N-10) Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 1,800,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Mitigation of repetitive losses County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Flagler St to SW 8 St between SW 87 Ave and SW 92 Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 2,420,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured General drainage improvements, mitigation of repetitive losses County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources From C-9 CANAL to NW 203 TERR. From NW 47 AVE to NW 52 AV Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 713,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Construct a wet detention pond in Sub-basin C9E2-402.Construct, widen, or clean existing ditches that drain to the pond. Plug culvert in N.W. 47th Avenue Canal. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources From Bahama Drive to Grouper Drive From Holiday Road to Anchor Road Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 1,500,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Construction 7,400 LF of french drains 13 of 93 179 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources From Davis DR to SW 88 ST, from SW 103 AVE to SW 107 AVE; From SW 88 TER to SW 90 ST, from SW 99 CT to SW 102 AVE; From SW 88 TER to SW 104 ST, from SW 77 AVE to SW 87 AVE; From SW 55 ST to SW 72 ST, from SW 114 AVE to SW 117 AVE. Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 720,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Construct baffles and pollution control structures to improve water quality in ten (10) outfalls. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources From SW 102 AVE to SW 114 AVE between S Dixie Hwy and the FL Turnpike Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 3,264,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Construction 6,200 LF of french drains, pollution control structure and emergency overflow to the C1-N canal. Construction 12,200 LF of solid pipes to interconnect the existing system to the new french drains and emergency overflow to the C1-N canal. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources From SW 24 ST to Bird Road between From SW 107 AVE to SW 117 AVE Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 718,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Construction of 3,375 LF of french drains. Installation of 8 new catch basins and interconnect the 13 existing catch basins to the new exfiltration system. Mitigation of repetitive losses. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources From SW 264 ST to SW 284 ST; from SW 167 AVE to SW 177 AVE Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 2,032,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Construct 4 new outfalls (4-5'wx4.5'h box culverts) from C103-N-5 to C-103 Canal. Construct 7,170 LF of french drains. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources From SW 266 ST to SW 288 ST; from SW 127 AVE to SW 142 AVE Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 1,203,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Construct 7,000 LF of french drains County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources From SW 280 ST to SW 288 ST; from SW 142 AVE to South Dixie HWY Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 1,641,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Construct 6 new outfalls (5' w x 3' h box culverts) from C103N-N-5 to C-103 Canal. Construct 8,000 LF of french drains. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources From SW 56 ST (Miller Drive) to SW 72 ST (Sunset Drive) between From SW 87 AVE to SW 97 AVE Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 2,796,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Construct 14,800 LF of french drains. Construct baffles/ pollution control structure to improve outfall water quality. Install 55 new catch basins.Interconnect 37 existing catch basins to the new exfiltration system. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources From SW 56 ST (Miller Drive) to SW 72 ST (Sunset Drive) between SW 97 AVE to SW 107 AVE Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 2,067,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Construct 11,000 LF of french drains, with the installation of 56 new catch basins and interconnection of the existing catch basins to the new exfiltration systemConstruct new emergency overflow to C-2 Canal County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources From SW 73 TER to SW 88 ST between From Davis Drive to SW 107 AVE Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 602,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Installation of 4,200 LF of french drains, baffles and pollution control structures to improve for water quality of four outfalls. Construct 2,850 LF of french drains. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources From SW 92 AVE to SW 99 AVE (C100- E-5), and From SW 112 ST to SW 129 ST (C100-C-13, HOWARD-DR-1) Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 19,572,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Construction of a 11,200 gpm pump station and 3,970 LF of french drains, with pollution control structure and emergency overflow for the HOWARD-DR-1 Basin. Construction of a 94,000 gpm pump station, 10.5 acre storage area, and 17,500 LF of french drains, with pollution control structure and emergency overflow, for the C100C-E-5. Mitigation of repetitive losses and flood complaints. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources From SW 95 Ct to SW 117 Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 2,444,000.00 0 3/31/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources From W Flagler ST to SW 5 ST;from SW 77 AVE to C-4 Canal Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 2,817,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured General drainage improvements County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Golden Glades Ditch Canal X-Section Improvements (From NW 77 CT to NW 82 AVE) Future Unfunded Project Flood Unknown 676,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Canal cross section improvements County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Golden Glades Ditch Canal X-Section Improvements (From NW 67 AVE to NW 77 CT) Future Unfunded Project Flood Unknown 1,378,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Canal cross section improvements County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Golden Glades Ditch Canal X-Section Improvements (From NW 82 AVE to NW 87 AVE) Future Unfunded Project Flood Unknown 702,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Canal cross section improvements County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Golden Glades Ditch Canal X-Section Improvements (NW 170 ST, from NW 117 TO 137 AVE) Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 2,608,314.78 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Canal cross section improvements County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Highland Oaks Ditch Improvements Future Unfunded Project Flood unk (Select)360,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured New canal/ floodway improvements County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Highland Oaks Ditch Improvements (In the area of NW 202 St and NE 26 Ave) Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 360,000.00 0 5/4/2015 2 years after project funding is secured NEW CANAL/FLOODWAY IMPROVEMENT (NO CANAL RESERVATION EXISTS LAND ACQUISITION MAY BE REQUIRED) County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Improvements to Five (5) Dirt Roads (PWD Project No. 20130232) (GOB) Project in Planning Stage ,Flood GOB Funding Secured 1,055,000.00 0 3/24/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Larchmont Pump Retrofit Station Phases 1 & 2 Construction/Project Begun ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU/GOB Funding Secured 3,300,000.00 0 3/24/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED The design of the above site shall include, but is not limited to, the design of a new Stormwater Pump Station at NW 85 street and NW 2 Avenue and retrofit of the existing pump station at NW 85 Street and NW 5 Avenue. The work shall consist of installing new pumps with all components necessary, drainage structures, slabs, telemetry, exfiltration drains, grading, sodding, roadway restoration, including construction of concrete curb and gutter, and sidewalks where needed. 14 of 93 180 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Larchmont Pump Station Retrofit Construction/Project Begun ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU GOB Funding Secured 4,665,069.00 0 3/24/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED The design of the above site shall include, but is not limited to, the design of a new Stormwater Pump Station at NW 85 street and NW 2 Avenue and retrofit of the existing pump station at NW 85 Street and NW 5 Avenue. The work shall consist of installing new pumps with all components necessary, drainage structures, slabs, telemetry, exfiltration drains, grading, sodding, roadway restoration, including construction of concrete curb and gutter, and sidewalks where needed. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Lindgren Phase I and II PWD Project No. 20140198 Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 1,000,000.00 0 3/24/2016 2015 General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood compl County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Marlin Road and SW 186 Street Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 287,960.00 0 3/31/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Miami River Greenways Construction/Project Begun ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 510,359.00 0 3/25/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED The design of the above site shall include, but is not limited to all operation necessary to raise the areas drainage to meet County standards. The work shall consist of installing drainage structures, exfiltration drains, grading, sodding, roadway restoration including construction of concrete curb and gutters, and sidewalks, as applicable, where drainage was installed. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Miami River Greenways 75% complete ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 1,193,721.00 0 3/25/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED The design of the above site shall include, but is not limited to all operation necessary to raise the areas drainage to meet County standards. The work shall consist of installing drainage structures, exfiltration drains, grading, sodding, roadway restoration including construction of concrete curb and gutters, and sidewalks, as applicable, where drainage was installed. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Midway Addition (Phases V, VI & VII) Drainage Improvement Project - Flagler Street to NW 7 Street from NW 87 Avenue to NW 79 AvenuePWD Project No. 20130249) (GOB 77452 Midway Addition Phases V VI VII 75% complete ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 867,050.00 0 3/29/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Mid-Way Pump Station (NW 7 ST and SR 826) Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 1,300,000.00 0 5/4/2015 2 years after project funding is secured Pump station improvements to add approximately 2000 linear feet of 4-foot diameter intake piping and approximately 1800 linear feet of 2-foot diameter discharge piping. This project is intended to optimize use of the installed pump capacity at the sta* County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Miller Drive & SW 133 PL Construction/Project Begun ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 223,000.00 0 3/29/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NE 10 Ave from NE 147 to NE 149 Street Funding Secured ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 250000 0 7/1/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints Roadway drainage improvement County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NE 10 Avenue from NE 147 Street to NE 164 Street Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 336,496.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NE 108 Street from NE 5 Avenue to Alley Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge None 98,847.00 0 7/1/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NE 12 Ave & NE 169 Terrace Construction/Project Begun ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 128,302.00 0 4/11/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NE 12 Avenue and NE 111 Street Funding Secured ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 108809 0 6/30/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NE 14 Avenue and NE 191 Street Drainage Improvement Project Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 453,200.00 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NE 142 St and NE 2 Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 113,997.00 0 3/26/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NE 144 St between NE 12 Ave and NE 14 Ave Funding Secured ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 127,278.76 0 6/30/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NE 149 Street and NE 8 Avenue Funding Secured ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 1000000 0 6/30/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints 15 of 93 181 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NE 151 Street from Biscayne Boulevard to Bay Vista Boulevard Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge RIF Funding Secured 390,000.00 0 4/11/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NE 151 Street from NE 18 Avenue to NE 20 Avenue Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 277,062.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NE 155 Ter from NW 8 Ave to NW 9 Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 41,861.00 0 3/26/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NE 163 St to NE 79 St east NE 6 Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 900,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Mitigation of repetitive losses County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NE 164 St to Spur #4 Canal between N Biscayne Dr and NE 5 Ave (C8-N-17), Biscayne Canal to NW 135 St between Expwy and Biscayne Canal (C8-W-1), NE 4 Ave to Griffing Blvd between Ne 2 Ave and Biscayne Canal (C8-W-6), Biscayne Canal Rd to NE 92 St between NE 6 Ave and NE 1 Ave (C8-W-8) Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 900,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Mitigation of Repetitive Losses County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NE 167 Street & NE 14 Avenue Construction/Project Begun ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 50,000.00 0 4/11/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NE 167 Street and NE 14 Avenue Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 21,900.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NE 171 St and NE 213 St between NE 15 Ave and NE 34 Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 1,800,000.00 56 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Mitigation of Repetitive Losses and flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NE 18 Avenue and NE 199 Street Drainage Improvement Project Other ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 55,000.00 0 4/11/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NE 18 Avenue from NE 191 Street to NE 199 Street (NE 18 Avenue & NE 199 Street) Construction/Project Begun ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 280,241.00 0 4/11/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NE 197 Street and NE 24 Court Drainage Improvement Project Project in Planning Stage Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 145,463.00 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NE 214 St from NE 26 Ave to Dixie Hwy Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 12,392.00 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NE 22 AVE FROM NE 202 ST TO NE 199 ST ROADW WAY DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Other ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU FUNDING CAPITAL PROJECT Funding Secured 480,000.00 0 4/12/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NE 3 Ave and NE 159 St Drainage Improvements Other ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU/GOB Funding Secured 92,300.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NE 4th Ave and NE 139 St Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 811,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured General drainage improvements County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NE 90 Street from NE 10 Court to N. Bayshore Drive Funding Secured ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 377,144.80 0 6/30/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources North Miami Avenue from NW 20 Street to NW 22 Street Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 400,000.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints 16 of 93 182 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 133 ST from NW 13 AVE to NW 16 AVE / NW 132 TER from NW 13 AVE to NW 15 AVE Drainage Improvements Project in Planning Stage Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 291,000.00 0 3/26/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED The project will consist of the construction of a storm drainage system which will provide drainage in this area and will include the installation of exfiltration trenches along with drainage inlets in the public right-of-way. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 100 Ter and NW 6 Ave Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge Unknown Funding Secured 84381.87 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 102 Street and NW 7 Avenue Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge None 83,094.09 0 6/30/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 106 Street to NW 103 Street from NW 108 Avenue to NW 112 Avenue Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 340,000.00 0 4/21/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 106 St to NW 108 St from NW 2 Ct to NW 5 Ave Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge Unknown Funding Secured 392,582.00 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 107 Ave Canal Improvements Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge unknown 3,600,000.00 0 7/1/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED Canal Improvements County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 107 Avenue from NW 58 Street to NW 74 Street; and NW 97 Avenue & NW 41 Street -Drainage Improvement Project Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 980,000.00 0 4/21/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 108 Street from NW 5 Avenue to Alley Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 98,847.00 0 6/1/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 11 Ave to NW 8 Ave from NW 107 St to NW 111 St Project in Planning Stage Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 800,000.00 0 3/26/2015 2 years after project funding is secured General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 110 St and NW 2 Ct Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge,SWU Funding Secured 23,293.00 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 112 Ter from NW 10 Ave to NW 11 Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 11,682.00 0 3/26/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 118 St from NW 14 Ave to NW 15 Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 164,600.00 0 3/26/2015 2 years after project funding is secured General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 121 St from NW 18 Ave to NW 19 Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 88,676.00 0 3/26/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 127 St from NW 17 Pl to NW 17 Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 62,847.00 0 3/26/2015 2 years after project funding is secured General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 133 St from NW 20 Ave to NW 22 Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 168,786.00 0 3/26/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 137 AVE & NW 12 ST INLET MODIFICATION Other ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU FUNDING CAPITAL PROJECT Funding Secured 20,000.00 0 4/21/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 14 Ave and NW 111 St Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 41,861.00 0 3/26/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 14 Ave and NW 98 St Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 62,847.00 0 3/26/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints 17 of 93 183 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 14 Pl from NW 75 St to NW 77 Ter Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 29,746.00 0 3/26/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 146 St and NW 7 Ave (east end of street) Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 73,973.00 0 3/26/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 147 St from NW 9 Ave to NW 10 Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 76,822.00 0 3/26/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 158 ST & NW 22 AVE ROADWAY DRAINAGE RETROFIT Other ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU CAPITAL PROJECT CRS Funding Secured 987,000.00 0 4/21/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 159 Street from NW 2 Avenue to NW 6 Avenue Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 41,861.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 169 Terr to NW 170 St between NW 87 Ave and I-75 Ext Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 217,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured General drainage improvements and mitigation of repetitive losses and flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 173 DR from NW 60 ave to NW 72 AVE ROADWAY DRAINAGE RETROFIT Other ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU FUNDING CAPITAL PROJECT/GOB Funding Secured 750,000.00 0 4/21/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED SWU FUNDING CAPITAL PROJECT/GOB County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 178 Street from NW 89 Avenue to NW 90 Court 75% complete ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 72,190.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 18 Ave and NW 62 Ter Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge CDB5 Funding Secured 141,558.00 0 3/26/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 18 Place to NW 17 Court from NW 133 Street to NW 134 Street Funding Secured ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 291000 0 6/30/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 186 St, from NW 177 Ave to (approx.) NW 67 Ave Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 251,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Convert an existing positive drainage system into a hybrid system in Sub-basin 183-S. This control measure corresponds with the NPDES OUTFALL (52-40-11-NW-001C) County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 19 Ave and NW 83 St Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge QNIP Funding Secured 119,283.79 0 3/26/2015 2 years after project funding is secured General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 19 Ave from NW 68 Ter to NW 69 Ter Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 81,490.00 0 3/26/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 191 St between NW 32 Ave and NW 47 Avenue Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 1,870,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured General drainage improvements County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 2 Avenue and NW 120 Street Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 113,105.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 20 Avenue to NW 22 Avenue from NW 133 Street to NW 135 Street Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge None 168,786.00 0 6/30/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 21 Ave and NW 97 St Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 265,674.41 0 3/26/2015 2 years after project funding is secured General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 22 Avenue and NW 101 Street Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 62,847.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 22 Avenue from NW 54 Street to NW 56 Street Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 67,464.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints 18 of 93 184 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 24 Ave from NW 79 St to NW 78 St Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 41,861.00 0 3/26/2015 2 years after project funding is secured General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 24 Avenue and NW 87 Terrace Funding Secured ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 165,231.22 0 6/30/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 24 Avenue and NW 98 Street Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge None 106,563.33 0 6/30/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 26 Ave and NW 68 St Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 36,376.00 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 28 Ave and NW 67 St Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 62,846.00 0 3/26/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 29 St from NW 33 Ave to NW 32 Ave, and NW 24 St & NW 30 Ave Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 713,000.00 0 5/3/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 29 Street and NW 40 Avenue - Drainage ImprovementProject Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB/SWU Funding Secured 330,000.00 0 5/3/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 31 Avenue from NW 52 Street to NW 54 Street (Under evlaution to see if R&B can build - Mario DERM inspector requested) Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge None 95,665.54 0 6/30/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 32 Court and NW 84 Street Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge None 141,337.28 0 6/30/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 32 Street & NW North River Drive Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 150,000.00 0 5/3/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 34 Avenue and NW 95 Terrace Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge None 176,525.86 0 6/30/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 37 Avenue from North River Drive to NW 79 Street (PWD Project No. 20040330) (PTP) Construction/Project Begun ,Flood/Storm Surge PTP Funding Secured 14,855,900.00 0 5/3/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 41 St and NW 33 Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 27,010.00 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 43 Street and NW 74 Avenue Drainage Improvement Project Other ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 178,148.00 0 5/3/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 44 St from NW 27 Ave to NW 29 Ave Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 66,001.00 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 46 Street from NW 74 Avenue to NW 73 Avenue Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 321,449.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 5 Ave and NW 109 St Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 265,674.41 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 56 Street from NW 72 Avenue to NW 74 Avenue Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 393,445.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints 19 of 93 185 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 58 Street from NW 92 Avenue to NW 102 Avenue - Drainage Improvement Project 75% complete ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB 77465 Funding Secured 1,075,000.00 0 5/3/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 58 Street from NW 97 Avenue to SR-826 Other ,Flood/Storm Surge RIF Funding Secured 114,000,000.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 63 St from NW 22 Ave to NW 23 Ave Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 64,552.00 0 3/26/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 65 St from NW 24 Ct to NW 24 Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 62,847.00 0 3/26/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 67 Avenue from NW 167 Street to NW 168 Street Funding Secured ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 357,588.95 0 5/24/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 7 St from NW 62 Ave to NW 65 Ave Funding Secured ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 427,135.24 0 6/30/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 70 Avenue and NW 22 Street Drainage Improvement Project Other ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 246,000.00 0 5/3/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 74 Avenue from NW 25 Street to NW 31 Street Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 369,541.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 74 St to NW 58 St between NW 87 Ave and NW 77 Ct Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 900,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured The project will consist of the construction of a storm drainage system which includes the installation of continuous exfiltration trenches along with drainage inlets in the public right-of-way. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 74 Street from NW 114 Avenue to NW 107 Avenue Project No. 20060443 (PTP) Construction/Project Begun ,Flood/Storm Surge PTP Funding Secured 354,053.00 0 5/3/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 74 Street from NW 87 Avenue to Palmetto Expressway Construction/Project Begun ,Flood/Storm Surge PTP Funding Secured 5,802,503.00 0 5/11/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 76 ST FROM NW 36 AVE TO NW 37 AVE Funding Secured ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 425,000.00 0 5/3/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 76 St from NW 8 Ave to NW 10 Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 167,774.00 0 3/26/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 77 St and NW 30 Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 14,818.00 0 3/26/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 79 ST to NW 72 ST between E 11 AVE to NW 21 AVE Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 11,770,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Construct 25 acre storage in basin CC7-S-13, 15 acre storage in basin CC7-S-16, 3,700 LF of positive system, and 2,800 LF of French Drain connecting the two storage areas. Mitigation of Repetitive losses. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 79 Ter from NW 25 Ave to NW 27 Ave Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 50,255.00 0 3/26/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 80 Avenue and NW 66 Street Funding Secured ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 273,689.00 0 6/30/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 80 TER FROM NW 32 AVE TO NW 36 AVE Drainage Improvement Project Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 450,000.00 0 5/11/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints 20 of 93 186 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 80 Terrace from NW 32 Avenue to NW 33 Avenue Drainage Improvement Project Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 450,000.00 0 5/11/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 81 Ter from NW 30 Ave to NW 31 Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 146,789.00 0 3/26/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 82 St and NW 31 Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 41,861.00 0 3/26/2015 2 years after project funding is secured General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 83 St from NW 33 Ave to NW 35 Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 258,958.00 0 3/26/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 83 Street from NW 31 Avenue to NW 33 Avenue Funding Secured ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 272,900.81 0 6/30/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 85 St to NW 80 St between Miami Ave and NW 6 Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 968,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured General drainage improvements and mitigation of repetitive losses and flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 87 Avenue from NW 154 Street to NW 186 Street Project No. 20110194 (PTP) 75% complete ,Flood/Storm Surge PTP Funding Secured 490,256.00 0 5/11/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 87 Avenue from NW 186 Street to NW 189 Street Drainage Improvements Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 353,818.00 0 5/11/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 87 Street from NW 33 Avenue to NW 35 Avenue Future Unfunded Project unk Identified Funding Source 101,003.00 0 3/30/2015 unk General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 87 Ter from NW 33 Ave to NW 35 Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 178,754.00 0 3/26/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 88 Street from NW 24 Avenue to NW 25 Avenue Drainage Improvements Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 160,000.00 0 5/11/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 90 St from NW 15 Ave to Little River Rd Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 230,732.00 0 3/26/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 90 St from NW 21 Ave to NW 22 Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 148,478.00 0 3/26/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 93 St from NW 29 Ave to NW 29 Ct Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 61,909.00 0 3/26/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 96 Street from NW 34 Avenue to NW 35 Court Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge none 0.00 0 6/30/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 97 Ave canal improvements NW 97 Ave Between NW 138 st and NW 170 st Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 3,600,000.00 0 7/1/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED canal improvements County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 97 Avenue from NW 52 Street to NW 58 Street Other ,Flood/Storm Surge RIF Funding Secured 2,822,000.00 0 5/11/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 97 Avenue from NW 58 Street to NW 70 Street Other ,Flood/Storm Surge RIF Funding Secured 4,471,000.00 0 5/11/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW 98 Street from NW 29 Avenue to NW 30 Avenue Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge None 108,113.98 0 6/30/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints 21 of 93 187 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources NW South River Drive from NW 32 AVE. TO NW 38 AVE Other ,Flood/Storm Surge RIF Funding Secured 7,847,301.00 0 5/11/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED The design of the above site shall include, but is not limited to all operation necessary to raise the areas drainage to meet County standards. The work shall consist of installing drainage structures, exfiltration drains, grading, sodding, roadway restoration including construction of concrete curb and gutters, and sidewalks, as applicable, where drainage was installed. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Old Cutler Road Bike Path (Phase II) – Intersection of SW 136 Street and SW 63 Avenue to Cocoplum Circle/Cartagena PlazaPWD Project No. 20080191 (PTP) 25% complete ,Flood/Storm Surge PTP Identified Funding Source 1,131,821.00 0 5/11/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Oleta River Culverts Extension Project Other ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 300,960.00 0 5/11/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Phase I (PWD Project No. 671952) West 76 Street from West 28 Avenue to West 20 Avenue Project in Planning Stage Flood/Storm Surge OTHERS Funding Secured 4,977,321.00 0 5/12/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED The project consists of widening the existing roadway from 2 to 5 lanes, including a striped center left-turn lane, curb and gutter, sidewalks, a continuous storm drainage, pavement markings and signage, signalization and roadway lighting. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Pine Tree Drive and W 31 Street Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge None 106,563.33 0 6/30/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Project (PWD Project No. 20130255) (GOB 77447) Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 835,000.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Project No. 20060309 (JPA with City of Hialeah)75% complete ,Flood/Storm Surge JPA with City of Hialeah Funding Secured 3,300,000.00 0 5/12/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Project No. 20110158 (PTP)NW 36 Avenue from North River Drive to NW 36 Street (Phase II) Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge PTP Funding Secured 2,500,000.00 0 5/12/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED The project consists of two phases. Phase I consists of intersection improvements at North River Drive and NW 36 st roadway lighting for the entire corridor and signalization. Phase II consists of widening the roadway ligtting sidewalk ane a new storm drainage system County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Project No. 20120047 Town of Miami Lakes Construction/Project Begun ,Flood/Storm Surge Unknown Funding Secured 93,321.00 0 5/12/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Project No. 20130101 (RIF)Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge RIF Funding Secured 2,661,268.00 0 5/12/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources PWD Project No. 20040350 (PTP SW 264 Street from US-1 to SW 137 Avenue Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge PTP Funding Secured 40,613,888.00 0 5/12/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources PWD Project No. 20040386 (PTP) (JPA with City of Miami)25% complete ,Flood/Storm Surge PTP) (JPA with City of Miami)Funding Secured 4,702,799.00 0 5/12/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources PWD Project No. 20040388 (PTP) (JPA with City of Miami) Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge (PTP) (JPA with City of Miami)Funding Secured 4,541,048.00 0 5/12/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources PWD Project No. 20040389 (PTP) (JPA with City of Miami)25% complete ,Flood/Storm Surge (PTP) (JPA with City of Miami)Funding Secured 5,663,390.00 0 5/12/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources PWD Project No. 20040558 (RIF)Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge RIF Funding Secured 9,521,299.00 0 5/12/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources PWD Project No. 20120048 (SWU) Drainage Improvement Project Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 5,500,000.00 0 5/12/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources PWD Project No. 20120129 (GOB/PTP) Doral Arterial Drainage Improvement Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB/PTP Funding Secured 635,000.00 0 5/12/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints 22 of 93 188 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources PWD Project No. 20120130 (PTP)Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge PTP Funding Secured 82,000.00 0 5/12/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources PWD Project No. 20120131 (PTP) Draiange Improvement Project Other ,Flood/Storm Surge PTP Funding Secured 550,000.00 0 5/12/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources PWD Project No. 20120157 WO#1) (GOB 75% complete ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 295,279.00 0 5/12/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources PWD Project No. 20120161 (PTP) (SWU)Other ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 70,799.00 0 5/12/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources PWD Project No. 20130050 Drainage Improvement Project Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 47,615.00 0 5/12/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources PWD Project No. 20130054 (SWU)Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 376,000.00 0 5/13/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED The design of the above site shall include, but is not limited to all operation necessary to raise the areas drainage to meet County standards. The work shall consist of installing drainage structures, exfiltration drains, grading, sodding, roadway restoration including construction of concrete curb and gutters, and sidewalks, as applicable, where drainage was installed County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources PWD Project No. 20130231 (RIF)Other ,Flood/Storm Surge RIF Funding Secured 6,062,513.00 0 5/13/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED continuous storm drainage system County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources PWD Project No. 20130240 SW 2 Street to SW 4Street from SW 82 Avenue and SW 87 Avenue Construction/Project Begun ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 295,825.00 0 5/19/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED The design of the above site shall include, but is not limited to all operation necessary to raise the areas drainage to meet County standards. The work shall consist of installing drainage structures, exfiltration drains, grading, sodding, roadway restoration including construction of concrete curb and gutters, and sidewalks, as applicable, where drainage was installed. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources PWD Project No. 20130245 Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 359,000.00 0 5/13/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED The work shall consist of installing drainage structures, exfiltration drains, grading, sodding, roadway restoration including construction of concrete curb and gutters, and sidewalks, as applicable, where drainage was installed County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources PWD Project No. 20130246 (GOB 77465) Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 1,075,000.00 0 5/13/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED The work shall consist of installing drainage structures, exfiltration drains, grading, sodding, roadway restoration including construction of concrete curb and gutters, and sidewalks, as applicable, where drainage was installed County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources PWD Project No. 20130247 (GOB 77457) Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 72,000.00 0 5/13/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources PWD Project No. 20130250 (GOB 77460) Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 190,000.00 0 3/31/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources PWD Project No. 20130259 (GOB 77416) Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 147,000.00 0 5/13/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources PWD Project No. 20130260 (GOB 77464 ) Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 200,000.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources PWD Project No. 20130261 (GOB 77461) Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 155,000.00 0 5/13/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources PWD Project No. 20130262& No.20130274 (SWU) Little Arch Creek Salinity Control Structure Retrofit Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 850,000.00 0 5/13/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources PWD Project No. 20140020 West Dixie Highway from NE 164 Street to NE 173 Street Other ,Flood/Storm Surge RIF Funding Secured 8,005,653.00 0 5/23/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED The Scope of work consists of widening the roadway from 2 to 4 lanes. The proposed improvements include, but are not limited to, raised landscaped medians, bicycle facilities, continuous sidewalks, curb & gutter, existing signalization improvements, pavement markings and signage, decorative lighting, a continuous storm drainage system, replacement and widening of existing bridge crossing over the Snake River Canal, and ROW acquisition. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources PWD Project No. 20140199 Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 155,119.00 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints 23 of 93 189 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources PWWM Project No 20150035 Drainage Improvement Project Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 267,000.00 0 5/3/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources PWWM Project No. 20140177 NE 25 PL AND NE 187 ST Construction/Project Begun ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 18,998.00 0 5/13/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Redlands Canal Improvements Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 2,500,000.00 0 7/1/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED Canal Improvements County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Replacement of culvert canal crossings at 67th Avenue just north of 36th Street. Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 1,238,000.00 0 5/13/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Roadway drainage Improvements and the addition of three pollution control structures Other ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU FUNDING CAPITAL PROJECT Funding Secured 568,000.00 0 5/16/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED Roadway drainage Improvements and the addition of three pollution control structures County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Royal Green Drainage Improvement Project - SW 127 Way to SW 131 Court from SW 54 Street to SW 56 Street (PWD Project No. 20130234 (GOB 77456 Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB 77456 Funding Secured 596,796.00 0 5/16/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources School and Park (PWD Project No. 20130248) (GOB 77455) Project in Planning Stage Flood/Storm Surge (GOB 77455 Funding Secured 135,000.00 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED Swale Block installation along SW 108 Street, east of SW 127 Avenue, abutting Arvida Middle County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Seaboard Acres Pump Station Retrofit Construction/Project Begun ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU/GOB Funding Secured 3,317,350.00 0 5/17/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED Seaboard Acres Pump Station Retrofit. The design of the above site shall include, but is not limited to retrofit the existing pump station at Memorial Highway and NE 131 Street. The work shall consist of installing new pumps with all components necessary, drainage structures, slabs, telemetry, exfiltration drains, grading, sodding, roadway restoration including construction of concrete curb and gutters, and sidewalks where needed. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Severe Repetitive Loss Projects Future Unfunded Project Flood unk (Select)50,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown This project proposes to address all the remaining severe repetitive losses in Miami-Dade County through the Severe Repetitive Loss (SRL) grant program, authorized by the Bunning-Bereuter-Blumenauer Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2004, which amended the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 to provide funding to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk of flood dam-age to severe repetitive loss (SRL) structures insured under the National Flood Insurance Pro-gram (NFIP). The estimated average cost for the mitigation of each severe repetitive loss varies. FEMA may contribute up to 100 percent of the total amount approved under the Repetitive Flood Claims grant award to implement approved activities, if the Applicant has demonstrated that the proposed activities cannot be funded under the Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) program. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources South Biscyane River Dr from NW 5 Ave to NW 6 Ave Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 38,396.00 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources South Miami Avenue from 15 Road to 8 Street Other ,Flood/Storm Surge SEC Funding Secured 3,332,463.00 0 5/17/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Storm Water Control Other ,Flood RER to report Funding Secured 70,000,000.00 0 6/30/2014 2 years after project funding is secured Miami Dade County passed a 70 million bond issue named QNIP (Quality Neighboorshoods Improvement Program) to relieve neighborhood flooding. QNIP dollars were used as a project or global match for C-4 Basin Initiative County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Sunset Harbor Drainage Improvement Project - SW 127 Avenue to SW 128 Avenue from SW 58 Street to SW 65 Street Other ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 489,600.00 0 5/17/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 58 Street from SW 152 Avenue to SW 148 Place Other ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 180,128.00 0 5/17/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 10 Ter from SW 84 Ct to SW 86 Ct Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 14,900.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 10 TERRACE AND SW 88 AVENUE ROADWAY DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU FUNDING CAPITAL PROJECT Funding Secured 95,000.00 0 5/17/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints 24 of 93 190 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 102 Avenue from SW 48 Street to SW 46 Street Swale Blocks Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 130,295.00 0 3/31/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 104 Ct from SW 40 St to SW 39 St Swale Blocks Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 4,825.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 104 Street from SW 137 Avenue to SW Hammocks Boulevard 75% complete ,Flood/Storm Surge OTHERS Funding Secured 313,827.00 0 5/17/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 104 Street from SW 156 Avenue to SW 157 Avenue Project in Planning Stage ,Flood GOB Funding Secured 245,000.00 0 3/31/2015 Fiscal year 2015 General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 104 Street from SW 157 Avenue to SW 142 Avenue 75% complete ,Flood SWU Funding Secured 505,335.00 0 5/17/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 108 Ave from SW 40 St to SW 39 St Swale Blocks Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 48,760.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 111 Street from SW 100 Avenue to SW 102 Avenue Drainage Improvement Project Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 123,000.00 0 5/18/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 112 Avenue and SW 116 Terrace Drainage Improvement Project Other ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 148,799.52 0 5/18/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 112 Avenue and SW 41 Terrace Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 61,835.00 0 3/31/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 114 Street and SW 107 Avenue Other ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 139,142.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 12 Street from SW 102 Avenue to SW 103 Court Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 120,608.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 122 Ave to SW 127 Ave, From SW 104 St to SW 120 St Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge None 8,000,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Construction of a 32,800 gpm pump station, 7.0 acre storage, 4,300 LF canal berm and 9,200 of french drains with pollution control structure and emergency overflow, for C100-N-4 Basin County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 122 Ave, From SW 104 ST to SW 105 Terrace Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge OTHER Funding Secured 290,000.00 0 5/4/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED Drainage improvements SW 122 Ave, From SW 104 ST to SW 105 Terrace County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 122 St and SW 111 Ave (general area)Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 211,140.00 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 124 Ave and SW 218 St Other ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 56,500.00 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 127 Avenue from SW 18 Street to SW 26 Street Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 135,000.00 0 3/31/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 127 Ter from SW 115 Ave to End of Cul-de-sac Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 276,577.00 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 128 Avenue and SW 128 Street Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 56,500.00 0 3/31/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints 25 of 93 191 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 128 Court and SW 207 Terrace - Drainage Improvement Project Other ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 240,000.00 0 5/18/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 128 Ter to SW 131 Ter from SW 108 Ct to SW 112 Ave (Pine Shores Addition) Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 672,100.00 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 131 St from SW 87 Ave to SW 89 Ave Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 377,369.00 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 132 Ave from SW 280 St to SW 278 Ter Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 93,787.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 132 Avenue from SW 117 Terrace to SW 120 Street Construction/Project Begun ,Flood/Storm Surge PTP Funding Secured 392,645.00 0 5/18/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 136 Street and SW 74 Avenue Drainage Improvement Project Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 100,000.00 0 5/18/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 137 AVE DITCH Improvements Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 4,410,000.00 0 7/1/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED DITCH Improvements County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 137 Avenue from SW 200 Street to US-1PWD Project No. 20090003 (PTP) Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge PTP Funding Secured 15,396,778.00 0 5/18/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 137 Avenue from US-1 to HEFTPWD Project No. 20040344 (PTP) Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge PTP Funding Secured 6,097,082.00 0 5/18/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 142 Avenue from SW 40 Street to SW 56 Street Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 1,095,826.00 0 3/31/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 142 Avenue from SW 8 Street to Coral Way Other ,Flood/Storm Surge RIF Funding Secured 2,208,035.00 0 5/18/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 142 Ln and SW 108 Ct Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 68,733.00 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 144 Ave from SW 280 St to SW 284 St Funding Secured ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 88,500.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 147 Avenue from SW 93 Street to SW 104 Street Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 1,039,047.00 0 3/31/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 152 At and SW 157 Ave between 144 Ct and 142 Ave (C1-C-12), SW 210 St and SW 192 St between SW 122 Ave and SW 130 Ct (C1-N-9), SW 184 St and SW 208 Terr between SW 127 Ave and Sw 113 St (C1N- W-3) Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 2,250,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Mitigation of Repetitive Losses County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 152 Avenue and SW 60 Terrace Other ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 343,848.00 0 5/18/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 152 Avenue from SW 60 Terrace to SW 68 Lane Funding Secured ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 378,578.00 0 3/31/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints 26 of 93 192 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 152 St to SW 138 St, From SW 95 Ct to SW 117 Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 20,444,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Construction of a 38,600 gpm pump station and 8,200 LF of french drains with pollution control structure and emergency overflow for C100-S-5. Mnitigation of repetitive losses and flood complaints. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 152 Street and SW 82 Avenue Drainage Improvement Project Construction/Project Begun ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 220,000.00 0 5/18/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 152 Street from SW 157 Avenue to SW 147 Avenue Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge RIF Funding Secured 6,414,000.00 0 5/12/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 152 Terr and SW 160 St between SW 126 Ave and S Dixie Hwy Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 900,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Mitigation of repetitive losses and flood complaints. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 157 AVE Canal Interconnect Funding Secured Flood Capital (Select)0.00 63 9/2/2014 2 years Project No. 20130213 County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 157 AVE CANAL, from SW 8 ST to Bird RD Future Unfunded Project Flood unk (Select)3,960,000.00 0 7/19/2013 2 years after project funding is secured New Canal County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 157 Avenue and SW 256 Street Drainage Improvement Project Other ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 36,300.00 0 3/31/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 157 Avenue and SW 98 Terrace (QNIP) Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 119,986.00 0 3/31/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 157 Avenue from SW 184 Street to SW 152 Street 75% complete ,Flood/Storm Surge PTP Funding Secured 7,128,130.00 0 5/18/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 157 Avenue from SW 304 Street to SW 308 Street Other ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 447,500.00 0 3/31/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 157 Avenue from SW 42 Street to SW 59 Terrace Other ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB SWU Funding Secured 1,300,000.00 0 5/12/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 157 Avenue from SW 88 Street to SW 91 Street 75% complete ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 213,519.00 0 3/31/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 16 St to SW 24 St from SW 87 Ave to SW 92 Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 354,000.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 167 Ave Canal(167 Ave, from SW 10 St to SW 42 St) Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 12,900,000.00 0 5/4/2015 2 years after project funding is secured NEW CANAL (NO CANAL RESERVATION EXISTS LAND ACQUISITION MAY BE REQUIRED) County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 167 AVE Ditch West, from SW 240 ST to SW 258 ST Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 2,106,000.00 0 7/1/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED NEW CANAL (NO CANAL RESERVATION EXISTS LAND ACQUISITION MAY BE REQUIRED) County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 169 Ave, from SW 240 ST to SW 258 St Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 2,640,000.00 0 5/4/2015 2 years after project funding is secured NEW CANAL (NO CANAL RESERVATION EXISTS LAND ACQUISITION MAY BE REQUIRED) County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 172 St and SW 142 Ct Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 185,125.00 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 176 Street from US-1 to SW 107 Avenue 75% complete ,Flood/Storm Surge PTP Funding Secured 4,434,642.00 0 5/18/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 191 St from SW 127 Ave to End of Cul-de-sac Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 88,450.00 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints 27 of 93 193 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 2 Street to SW 4 Street from SW 82 Avenue to SW 87 Avenue Drainage Improvement Project PWD Project No.20130240 Construction/Project Begun ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 144,000.00 0 5/19/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED The design of the above site shall include, but is not limited to all operation necessary to raise the areas drainage to meet County standards. The work shall consist of installing drainage structures, exfiltration drains, grading, sodding, roadway restoration including construction of concrete curb and gutters, and sidewalks, as applicable, where drainage was installed. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 204 St, from SW 152 Ave to SW 162 Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 2,100,000.00 0 5/4/2015 2 years after project funding is secured NEW CANAL/FLOODWAY IMPROVEMENT (NO CANAL RESERVATION EXISTS LAND ACQUISITION MAY BE REQUIRED) County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 207 Terrace from SW 124 Court to SW 126 Avenue Drainage Improvement Project Construction/Project Begun ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 275,000.00 0 5/19/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 212 St to SW 218 St from SW 117 Ave to SW 127 Ave (West Goulds) Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 1,446,189.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 216 Street from SW 127 Avenue to the HEFT (Turnpike) -Phase II from SW 127 Avenue to SW 112 Avenue (Phase I is completed) Other ,Flood/Storm Surge PTP Funding Secured 8,846,126.00 0 5/19/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 218 St from SW 124 Ct to SW 127 Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 47,050.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 220 st bet SW 103 CT & SW 102 Ave (10298 SW 229 ST Construction/Project Begun ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 80,000.00 0 5/19/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 24 ST from SW 99 AVE to SW 107 AVE Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 106,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Convert 8 acres of positive drainage system into a french drain system. Install approximately 500 LF of french drains County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 24 ST to SW 12 ST from SW 82 AVE to Palmetto Expressway Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 1,089,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Construct additional 7,270 LF of French Drain Hybrid systems connecting to the SW 16th Street system and the recently reconstructed Coral Way system. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 24 ST to SW 40 ST from SW 82 AVE to Palmetto Expressway Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 8,228,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Install additional 26,179 LF of French Drain and hybrid systems connecting to the existing systems and Coral Way. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 256 St to SW 264 St from SW 122 Ave to SW 127 Ave (Meadow Wood Area Phase 4B) Funding Secured ,Flood/Storm Surge QNIP/SWU Funding Secured 660,000.00 0 3/30/2015 tbd General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 26 Street to SW 42 Street from SW 142 Avenue to SW 144 Avenue (JG Head Phase IIA) Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 11,000.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 264 Street from US-1 to SW 147 Avenue PWD Project No. 20070513 (RIF Design Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge RIF Design Funding Secured 1,640,362.00 0 5/19/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 268 Street to SW 264 Street Connector from SW 147 Avenue to SW 119 Avenue PWD Project No. 20060240 (RIF Design) & the same to #67 from Project List for Commission District Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge RIF Funding Secured 11,713,702.00 0 5/19/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 271 Ter and SW 142 Ct Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 162,690.00 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 272 St and SW 128 Ave (Airbase Elementary)Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 139,322.00 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 28 St to SW 28 St Rd and SW 76 Ave Project in Planning Stage Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 118,100.00 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 29 ST FROM SW 82 AV TO SW 84 AV Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 100,000.00 0 5/19/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints 28 of 93 194 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 296 St and SW 162 Ave Project in Planning Stage Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 142,450.00 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 328 Street from SW 187 Avenue to US-1 PWD Project No. 20100505 RIF Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge RIF Funding Secured 6,200,000.00 0 5/19/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 328 Street from US-1 to SW 162 Avenue Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge RIF Funding Secured 9,789,193.00 0 5/19/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 344 St from SW 207 Ave to SW 214 Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 356,440.00 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 36 St from SW 132 Ave to SW 136 Ave Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge None 83,372.00 0 6/30/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 38 Street from SW 62 CT to SW 63 Ave 50% complete ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU/GOB Funding Secured 57,268.00 0 5/19/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 39 St from SW 75 Ave to SW 73 Ct Project in Planning Stage Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 228,482.00 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 4 Street from SW 82 Avenue to SW 87 Avenue Future Unfunded Project unk Identified Funding Source 150,311.00 0 3/30/2015 unk General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 40 Ter (North side) from SW 97 Ave to SW 99 Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 13,730.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 40 Ter from SW 94 Ave to SW 93 Ave Swale Blocks Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 42,090.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 42 Ter to SW 53 St from SW 125 Ave to SW 132 Ave (Royal Green) Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 665,000.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 42 TERRACE FROM SW 99 COURT TO SW 101 AVE PROJECT CONSIST OF FULL ON SITE DETENTION SYSTEM TO RETAIN THE 5 YEARS STORM Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 169,982.39 0 5/19/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 48 Ln from SW 142 Ave to SW 142 Pl Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge None 86,978.00 0 6/30/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 5 St from SW 78 Ct to SW 78 Pl Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 226,482.00 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 55 St from SW 94 Ct to SW 93 Ct Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 72,000.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 57 Avenue and SW 45 Street Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 53,430.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 63 ST CANAL, from SW 167 AVE, West for 0.2 miles) Future Unfunded Project Flood unk (Select)510,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured New Canal County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 63 ST CANAL, from SW 167 Ave, West for 0.2 miles) Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 510,000.00 0 5/4/2015 2 years after project funding is secured NEW CANAL (NO CANAL RESERVATION EXISTS LAND ACQUISITION MAY BE REQUIRED) 29 of 93 195 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 68 Ave and SW 13 Ter Funding Secured ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 141137 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 69 Avenue and SW 10 Street Drainage Improvement Project Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 230,000.00 0 5/19/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 72 Court from SW 9 Street to SW 11 Street; and SW 9 Street from SW 73 Place to SW 72 Court Other ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 182,948.00 0 5/19/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 72 St to SW 88 St between 107 Ave and 117 Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 450,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Mitigation of Repetitive Losses and flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 79 St (North side) from SW 132 Ave to SW 133 Ave Swale Blocks Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 160,885.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 8 ST to SW 15 ST from SW 42 AVE to Santiago ST Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 1,772,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Install 16,604 LF of French Drain and hybrid systems. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 80 Street and SW 152 Avenue - Drainage and Swale Improvements Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 653,463.00 0 5/20/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 82 Avenue from Bird Road to SW 48 Street Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge None 86,978.00 0 6/30/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 82 Avenue from SW 8 Street to SW 9 Terrace Swale Blocks 25% complete ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 77,050.00 0 3/31/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 82 Street from W Cheryl Lane to E Cheryl Lane Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 35,200.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 88 Court from Sw 52 Street to Sw 54 Street Funding Secured ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 317,028.32 0 6/30/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 89 Ave from SW 40 St to SW 40 Ter Swale Blocks Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 32,430.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 89 Pl from SW 48 St to SW 51 St Swale Blocks Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 108,790.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 9 Ter from SW 42 Ave to SW 43 Ave Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 155,437.00 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 92 AVE FROM SW 8 TER TO SW 12 ST ROADWAY DRAINAGE Funding Secured ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU FUNDING CAPITAL PROJECT Funding Secured 616,537.22 0 5/20/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 92 Avenue and SW 42 Terrace (Blue Lakes Park) Swale Blocks Funding Secured ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 73,945.00 0 3/31/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 92 Pl from SW 15 St to SW 13 St Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 53,000.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 93 Ct from SW 51 St to SW 48 St Funding Secured ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 55,000.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints 30 of 93 196 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 94 Ave from SW 40 Ter to SW 40 St Swale Blocks Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 35,535.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 95 Ct and SW 5 Ln Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge GOB Funding Secured 85,200.00 0 3/27/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 96 Ave from SW 40 Ter to SW 40 St Swale Blocks Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown 46,115.00 0 3/30/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 97 Avenue from West Flagler Street to SW 8 Street Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge QNIP Funding Secured 274,000.00 0 3/31/2015 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 97 Avenue North of Old Cutler Road Other ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB/SWU Funding Secured 155,800.00 0 5/20/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 97 Avenue to Sw 94 Avenue from Sw 8 Street to Sw 14 Street Funding Secured ,Flood/Storm Surge QNIP Funding Secured 329,852.00 0 6/30/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 97 Place from W Flagler Street to NW 1 Terrace Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge None 47,407.75 0 6/30/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources SW 98 AVE FROM SW 16 TER TO SW 19 ST Other ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 276,577.40 0 5/20/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Swale blocks west side SW 103 Pl and SW 13 ST Westbrook Park ROW Improvement Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 36,000.00 0 5/20/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Town Park Heights Drainage Improvement Project - SW 97 AVE TO SW 95 AVE FROM SW 9 TER TO SW 12 ST Other ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 257,315.00 0 5/20/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Town Park Heights Drainage Improvement Project - SW 97 AVE TO SW 95 AVE FROM SW 9 TER TO SW 12 ST 25% complete ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU Funding Secured 153,720.05 0 5/20/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Water Control Structures Retrofit NW 58 St & NW 117 Ave NW 12 ST & NW 117 AVE Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU/GOB Funding Secured 240,000.00 0 5/20/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED General drainage improvements, mitigation of flood complaints County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources West 24 Avenue from West 52 Street to West 76 Street PWD Project No. 610157 (SGT) Project in Planning Stage Flood/Storm Surge SGT Funding Secured 8,583,516.00 0 5/23/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED The project consists of widening the existing roadway from 2 to 5 lanes, including a striped center left-turn lane, curb and gutter, sidewalks, a continuous storm drainage, pavement markings and signage, signalization and roadway lighting. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources West 76 Street from West 36 Avenue to West 28 Avenue (Phase II)PWD Project No. 671952 (SGT) Project in Planning Stage Flood/Storm Surge SGT Funding Secured 5,476,355.00 0 5/23/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED The project consists of widening the existing roadway from 2 to 5 lanes, including a striped center left-turn lane, curb and gutter, sidewalks, a continuous storm drainage, pavement markings and signage, signalization and roadway lighting. County Departments Regulatory and Economic Resources Westwind Lakes Phase 1 - SW 65 Terrace to SW 72 Street from SW 151 Court to SW 147 Avenue Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge SWU GOB Funding Secured 545,221.00 0 2/16/2016 2 YEARS AFTER PROJECT FUNDING IS SECURED Mitigation of Repetitive Losses and flodd complaints County Departments Seaport Cruise Berth 6 Stormwater Improv Construction/Project Begun ,Flood requesting mitigation funds for this project Identified Funding Source 750,000.00 48 12/10/2015 FY16-17 Installation of drainage systems, including elevating the existing outfall, above current federal, state and local requirements in order to eliminate flooding, to treat storm water runoff to reduce the release of contaminants into the Biscayne Bays, and reduce the loss of operations at the Port in the new Cruise Berth 6 project. The project will be done as part of the new Berth 6 construction project to save on overall construction costs. project number 2011.046 31 of 93 197 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Seaport CT J Bulkhead Other ,Flood,Storm Surge This project will be submitted under HMGP funding , as the Port will be implementing mitigation measures to the Seawall. Grant Applied For 9,812,593.62 80 11/29/2017 24 months The Cruise Terminal J Seawall Repairs project is comprised of, but not limited to: maintenance of traffic and environmental protection, including construction of temporary fencing, barriers and gates to define the work area; demolition, excavation, removal of existing concrete cap, and excavation of upland area to expose tieback system connection; construction of new concrete cap, encapsulating the existing bulkhead and extending down to - 3.0 feet (Mean Low Tide); backfilling and compacting excavated areas to match existing; installation of double-bitt deck fittings (marine bollards) and foam-filled fender system; extending the potable water and fire protection distribution system, providing fire hydrant and potable water stations, with concrete enclosures; paving apron area, including heavy-duty asphaltic concrete pavement and base; providing pavement markings and signage, and any supportive ancillary tasks to the primary scope of services to successfully complete the project. County Departments Seaport SFCT Stormwater Redevelopment Other ,Flood/Storm Surge Project is under design, federal and state grant applied for in 2017. Grant Applied For 3,500,000.00 62 12/10/2015 FY16-17 Upgrade of the existing drainage systems, including elevating the existing outfall, above current federal, state and local requirements in order to eliminate flooding, to treat storm water runoff to reduce the release of contaminants into the Biscayne Bays, and reduce the loss of operations at the Port in the South Florida Container Terminal cargo yard. The project will be done as part of the new electrical Rubber Tire Gantry Project (RTGs)to save on overall construction costs. Project number 2017-034. County Departments Seaport Storm Drainage Improvements Other ,Flood This project is budgeted. Identified Funding Source 3,500,000.00 0 12/16/2013 > 1 year Install and/or upgrade drainage systems throughout PortMiami (Shed G, TIR, 1630) in excess of current fed-eral, state and local requirements in order to eliminate flooding and to treat storm water runoff to reduce the release of contaminants into Biscayne Bay and reduce the risk of loss of goods and property long-term at the Port. This project will be done as a phased project with an estimated cost of $1 million each fiscal year. County Departments Seaport Stormwater Improvements Bays 148- 177 Other ,Flood Seeking mitigation grant funds for this stormwater drainage project at the port. This project is under design and construction is starting in Dec 2018. Identified Funding Source 2,000,000.00 58 12/10/2015 FY18-19 In order to prevent any hazard and endure severe wind, rain and storm surge events and any damage during inclement weather conditions to this heavy containerized area, the upgrade of existing drainage systems, including elevating the existing outfalls, above current federal, state and local requirements to reduce the loss of operations at the Port in the existing cargo yard from approximately berths 148-177 is needed. This project will be done as part of the overall bulkhead improvement project to raise the bulkhead to minimize the effects of a storm surge on Port operations. project number 2010.051 County Departments Seaport Strengthening of CT Bulkheads & New Berths Other ,Other,Storm Surge This is a Seawall Rehabilitation project and it is budgeted. Identified Funding Source 12,000,000.00 0 12/16/2013 2018 In order to prevent any hazard and endure severe wind, rain and storm surge events and any damage during inclement weather conditions the strengthening of the low-lying bulkhead wall system, pavement of the north side area and new berths are needed. The work includes design and construction for the removal and replacement of fenders, mooring bollards as well as bulkheads cap. The project also includes drainage, apron and pavement improvements in this area as a mitigation measure to reduce hazard impacts and manage floods. Seaport project number 2010-038 County Departments Seaport Upgrade of Master Pump Station Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge Capital Improvement 5,000,000.00 0 12/16/2013 > 1 year This project consists of upgrading PortMiami’s main pump station with submersible pumps to prevent damage from storm flooding along with the installation of a permanent emergency back-up generator resulting from power failure. Project is currently under design for this long-term hazard mitigation project designed to protect the Port’s critical infrastructure from natural disasters for a life expectancy of 50 years. County Departments Water and Sewer CDWWTP BULK HYPOCHLORITE STORAGE BUILDING STORM HARDENING UPGRADE Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge to be determined Grant Applied For 6,000,000.00 95 11/21/2017 36 Months The Central District Wastewater Treatment Plant is located on the city shoreline and it has a sodium hypochlorite solution (bleach) storage and distributing system which needs to be protected from exposure to hurricanes, tropical storms, sea level rise, storm surge and corrosive environment. A protective building around the storage tanks and pumps should be built promptly to avoid potential chemical leaks which may represent a hazard to the employees and the community. County Departments Water and Sewer Construct a Wind Barrier at the South District Wastewater Treatment Plant Future Unfunded Project All Hazards Potential Grant Applied For 85,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown Construct a wind barrier wall to the east of the on-site portable offices being used for the HLD and laboratory offices. These structures are protected on one side by existing structures. Constructing this wall would mitigate damage to the structures. County Departments Water and Sewer Construct New South Miami Heights Maintenance Facility Future Unfunded Project All Hazards Potential Grant Applied For 35,000,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown The Water Distribution Division located at South Miami Heights is currently housed in trailers. After a hurricane the Water Distribution Division cannot work out of the South Miami Maintenance Facility. The new building will provide a hurricane resistant structure with emergency backup generators to provide a staging and operations center for the emergency period in southern Miami-Dade County. County Departments Water and Sewer Hand-Held GPS Units Future Unfunded Project Communications Failure Potential Grant Applied For 50,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown These will assist our field crews in the location of pump stations after a disaster, especially in the event of major devastation. In addition, these units would be helpful to personnel from other units that may provide assistance to MD-WASD. County Departments Water and Sewer Harden Water and Sewer Department Buildings Future Unfunded Project Wind Potential Grant Applied For 20,000,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown A safe room is needed for MD-WASD employees who operate the wastewater treatment plants at the Central and South District wastewater treatment plants during storm or disaster events. County Departments Water and Sewer HEPA Filters at Water Storage Tanks Future Unfunded Project Health Potencial Grant Applied For 250,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown This project covers the retrofitting of eight storage tanks to incorporate HEPA filters at water storage tanks air vents to protect against chemical or bacteriological contamination. County Departments Water and Sewer Increased Wastewater Transmission and Treatment Capacity Future Unfunded Project Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Pow er Failure,Sea Level Rise,Wind Unknown Grant Applied For 80,000,000.00 89 12/1/2012 2021 for Phase 1 Phase 1: Seawall currently at 75% design – Construction of a flood/wind mitigation project for PS 1 including seawall elevation/replacement, berms, and general flood proofing of structures. The Seawall /site project phase includes the planning (as needed per phase), design (as needed per phase), and construction (all phases) of the project $6.8 Million. Phase 2: Harden 20 pump stations by elevating controls, generators, installing generators as necessary, and acquiring repetitive loss properties (as necessary for use only for pump station upgrades). The plan is conceptualized in the WASD PSIP/OOL/CD planning reports, identifying Priority 1 Pump Stations with structures below WASD flood elevation design criteria standards. This project includes the planning, developing resiliency design, and construction of projects. Match will be determined in a per pump station planning report based on BCA. Project may be reduced in scope to a per pump station scope at the project cost of $ 1,000,000 to $2,500,000 (Federal match $75,000 to $1,875,000) depending on size, land acquisition, requirement for generator, etc. County Departments Water and Sewer LeJeune Road Emergency Operations Center Future Unfunded Project Power Failure Potential Grant Applied For 400,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown Convert an existing room at the LeJeune road building into an emergency operations center for the department. Includes is an emergency generator to power the center in the event of a power failure. 32 of 93 198 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription County Departments Water and Sewer Physical Security Risk Reduction Measures at Water Treatment Plants Future Unfunded Project Security/Terroris m,Health,Security Breach,Technologi cal Disruption,Other Unknown Grant Applied For 12,200,000.00 85 12/1/2012 1 year for Phase 1 These projects include physical security improvements to detect, delay and respond to adversarial actions at the treatment plants, such as hardening of perimeters, high security fencing, intrusion sensors, high security doors and vehicle restraints. Phase 1: $3 Million is needed to install closed circuit cameras to facilitate continuity of operating facilities during storm events by assessing damage and evaluating accessibility remotely and safely. County Departments Water and Sewer Relocate Water Mains in Rear Easements Future Unfunded Project Wind Potential Grant Applied For 530,908,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown Currently, there are 500 miles of mains located in rear easements. These mains are in the rear of properties and in alleys. Because of their location, access is oftentimes limited by, trees, sheds and other obstructions that have been placed over the main. After hurricane Wilma, there were 70 main breaks, 90% of them were located in the rear easements. By eliminating the rear easement mains and installing a new water main in front of the property, MD-WASD will reduce the number of main breaks after natural disasters, as well as, increase fire protection, provide improved service and eliminate the need for meter readers to enter private property. County Departments Water and Sewer Replace LeJeune Road Office Building HVAC Future Unfunded Project Flood Potential Grant Applied For 350,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown Convert the HVAC rooftop heating, ventilation and air conditioning system on the building's roof to an interior floor mounted system. County Departments Water and Sewer Replace Roof Mounted Exhaust Ventilation Fans Future Unfunded Project Wind Potential Grant Applied For 145,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown Westwood Lake Maintenance Facility. County Departments Water and Sewer Replace Roof Mounted Exhaust Ventilation Fans Future Unfunded Project Wind Potential Grant Applied For 25,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown Distribution Maintenance Facility County Departments Water and Sewer Replace Roof Mounted Exhaust Ventilation Fans Future Unfunded Project Wind applied for Grant Applied For 50,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown LeJeune Road Office. County Departments Water and Sewer Replace Roof Mounted Exhaust Ventilation Fans Future Unfunded Project Wind Unknown/None 30,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown 36th Street Maintenance Facility. County Departments Water and Sewer Replace Roof Mounted Exhaust Ventilation Fans Future Unfunded Project Wind POTENTIAL Grant Applied For 50,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown Medley Warehouse. County Departments Water and Sewer Replacement of Canal and Bridge Crossing Pipes Future Unfunded Project Flood Potential Grant Applied For 2,500,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown Replace canal and bridge crossing pipes with sub-aqueous crossings. County Departments Water and Sewer Risk Reduction Measures at Treatment Plants and Facilities Future Unfunded Project Health,Flood,Floo d/Storm Surge,Power Failure,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Wind Unknown Identified Funding Source 129,000,000.00 90 12/1/2012 2025 for Phase 1 This project includes hardening measures for the three wastewater treatment plants through 2075. It includes hardening wastewater facility assets identified at risk through the Ocean Outfall Legislative Program planning to withstand or recover from flooding from projected future combinations of storm surge from tropical storms and hurricanes, coupled with extreme rainfall and sea level rise (SLR) at each of Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department’s (WASD’s) three wastewater treatment plants, specifically the , and South District Wastewater Treatment Plant (SDWWTP), North District Wastewater Treatment Plant (NDWWTP), and Central District Wastewater Treatment Plant (CDWWTP). The improvements are based on 2075 sea level rise projections (consistent with the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact Sea Level Rise Projection) and are consistent with county policies and goals. The project has three phases that can be independently implemented: Phase 1: South District Wastewater Treatment Plant (SDWWTP) - $40 Million - population served in 2010: 697,267 Phase 2: Central District Wastewater Treatment Plant (CDWWTP) - $65.8 Million - population served in 2010: 641,823 Phase 3: North District Wastewater Treatment Plant (NCWWTP) - $23.2 Million - population served in 2010: 763,014 County Departments Water and Sewer Satellite Phones Future Unfunded Project Communications Failure Potential Grant Applied For 15,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown After Hurricane Andrew, communications were virtually non-existent. With satellite phones distributed to our field crews as well as regional command centers, better and faster recovery after a disaster can occur. Phones would be made available to our plant maintenance, pump station and pipeline divisions. County Departments Water and Sewer Shelters for Critical Equipment Future Unfunded Project All Hazards Potential Grant Applied For 5,000,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown Much of MD-WASD's emergency equipment is currently stored outdoors: This item proposed the construction of shelters to store portable pumps and generators at sites already owner by MD-WASD. County Departments Water and Sewer Transfer Water Service from Rear to Front in Locations with Dual Systems Future Unfunded Project All Hazards Potential Grant Applied For 16,048,500.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown MD-WASD has estimated that approximately 20% of rear easement mains are dual feeds, i.e., there are existing mains, one in the front and the other in the rear of a customer's premises. Some customers have not changed their connection from the rear main to the main in front of the property. MD-WASD would propose an ordinance obligating the customers to transfer their service to the main located in front of their property. By using the main located in front of the property, WASD will reduce the number of main breaks after natural disasters, as well as, increase fire protection, provide improved service and eliminate the need for meter readers to enter private property. Hospitals Jackson Access Control - Jackson Memorial Hospital Future Unfunded Project ,Security Breach Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, Pre- Disaster Mitigation Grant Program Identified Funding Source 250,000.00 92 11/30/2017 December 2018 To secure key loading dock areas Hospitals Jackson Chiller - Jackson North Hospital Future Unfunded Project ,Power Failure,Health Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Identified Funding Source 675,000.00 89 11/30/2017 December 2018 Replacement of chiller to maintain temperatures inside the facility for the benefit of patients/guests and protect equipment Hospitals Jackson Digital Mass Communication - Jackson Memorial Hospital Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Health,Tec hnological Disruption,Wind Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, Pre- Disaster Mitigation Program Identified Funding Source 2,000,000.00 90 11/30/2017 December 2018 To implement an emergency bridge system throughout all buildings Hospitals Jackson Emergency Switchgear Replacements at JNMC Funding Secured ,Flood/Storm Surge GOB 2005 & Jackson's Bond Referendum November 5, 2013. Funding Secured 6,950,000.00 94 1/22/2015 Unknown To replace emergency switchgear at Jackson North Medical Center Hospitals Jackson Emergency Switchgears - Jackson Memorial Hospital Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Health Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Identified Funding Source 4,189,340.00 94 1/15/2014 Three years Replacement of emergency switchgears at Jackson Memorial Hospital Hospitals Jackson French drains - Jackson North Hospital Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Health Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Identified Funding Source 40,000.00 93 11/30/2017 December 2018 Replacement of several parking lot French drains to alleviate constant flooding that occurs during the rainy season. During the most recent hurricane there was severe flooding due to the rains and the water remained standing for several days. Hospitals Jackson Generator - Ambulatory Care Center Future Unfunded Project ,Health,Power Failure,Flood,Tech nological Disruption,Wind Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Identified Funding Source 250,000.00 89 01/12/2018 June 2018 Stand-alone generator for the PHT's Ambulatory Care Center 33 of 93 199 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Hospitals Jackson Generator - Highland Park Pavilion Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Power Failure,Health,Tec hnological Disruption,Wind Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Identified Funding Source 250,000.00 89 01/12/2018 June 2018 Stand-alone generator for the PHT's Highland Park Pavilion Hospitals Jackson Generator - Jackson Behavioral Health Hospital Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Power Failure,Technologi cal Disruption,Wind,H ealth Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Identified Funding Source 250,000.00 89 01/12/2018 June 2018 Stand-alone generator for the PHT's Behavioral Health Hospital Hospitals Jackson Generator - Jackson Multispecialty Center at Jackson North Future Unfunded Project ,Health,Power Failure,Flood,Tech nological Disruption,Wind Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Identified Funding Source 250,000.00 89 01/12/2018 June 2018 Stand-alone generator for the PHT's Jackson North Medical Center Hospitals Jackson JMH Long-Term Care Center Wind Retrofit Future Unfunded Project ,Health,Power Failure,Flood,Tech nological Disruption,Wind Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Identified Funding Source 3,800,000.00 89 11/30/2017 October 2018 Wind Protection project for the Jackson Memorial Long Term Care facility, including protection of the building through high impact windows and protection in case of power outages due to severe winds through the installation of a fixed generator. Hospitals Jackson Power Source - Jackson Memorial Hospital Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Power Failure,Health,Wi nd Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, Pre- Disaster Mitigation Program Identified Funding Source 2,300,000.00 86 11/30/2017 June 2018 To upgrade power source of Jackson Memorial Hospital emergency generators Hospitals Jackson Roof Replacement - Holtz Children's Hospital Future Unfunded Project ,Health,Wind,Pow er Failure Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Identified Funding Source 350,000.00 90 11/30/2017 December 2018 Replace the roof at Holtz Children's Hospital, East Tower. Hospitals Jackson Utility/Energy Center at JMH Funding Secured ,Flood,Wind,Powe r Failure GOB 2005 & Jackson's Bond Referendum November 5, 2013. Funding Secured 5,290,000.00 94 1/22/2015 September 2016 To upgrade utility/energy center at Jackson Memorial Hospital Hospitals Jackson Volt Oil Switch Replacements Funding Secured ,Power Failure,Flood/Stor m Surge GOB 2005 & Jackson's Bond Referendum November 5, 2013. Funding Secured 7,350,000.00 94 1/22/2015 Unknown To replace volt oil switch at Jackson Memorial Hospital's South and Central Buildings Hospitals Jackson Walls Replacement - Holtz Children's Hospital Future Unfunded Project ,Health,Power Failure,Wind Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Identified Funding Source 100,000.00 91 11/30/2017 December 2018 Water filtration due to extensive wall cracks. During the most recent hurricane water penetrated the walls of the 7th Floor Mechanical Room at the Holtz Children's Hospital. As a result, water made it to the floor below and an entire patient unit had to be relocated. Hospitals Jackson Wind Retrofit Project - Holtz Children's Hospital Future Unfunded Project ,Health,Power Failure,Wind Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Identified Funding Source 7,000,000.00 89 11/30/2017 December 2018 Wind retrofit the Holtz Children's Hospital by installing a wind abatement system of lightweight glass fiber reinforced concrete panels or other equal products Hospitals Jackson Windows - Jackson South Medical Center Future Unfunded Project ,Health,Wind,Floo d,Power Failure,Technologi cal Disruption Hazard Mitigation Grant Program; Pre Disaster Mitigation Identified Funding Source 1,000,000.00 94 12/15/2017 1 year This project will enable us to replace single Payne windows to hurricane impact as required by the new codes, approximate number of windows to be replaced 150. Jackson South Medical Center is a critical facility servicing the communities of South Miami Dade County. Hospitals Mount Sinai Code Plus Construction Energy Center Facility Protect Redundant Power Supply Funding Secured Wind,Flood,Flood /Storm Surge,Health,Pow er Failure,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Technologic al Disruption Other Internal Funding 250,000.00 93 12/1/2012 less than 6 months Retrofit the Energy facility with code plus wind, storm surge and flood enhancements above the current Florida building code standards. Hospitals Mount Sinai Code Plus Construction Enhancements New Medical Office Tower Project in Planning Stage Wind,Flood,Flood /Storm Surge,Health,Pow er Failure,Sea Level Rise,Security Breach,Storm Surge,Technologic al Disruption The funding source is private and bond funding. Identified Funding Source 3,750,000.00 0 12/1/2012 2018 Construct a Primary Care and Medical Home Tower with code plus wind, storm surge and flood enhancements above the current Florida building code standards. Hospitals Mount Sinai Code Plus Construction Enhancements Surgical Tower 25% complete All Hazards FEMA Identified Funding Source 6,500,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown Construct a new surgical facility with code plus wind, storm surge and flood enhancements above the current Florida building code standards. Hospitals Mount Sinai Elevate Seawall Project in Planning Stage Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise DOH and USACE Section 14 Grant Awarded 7,000,000.00 96 12/1/2012 2020 Raise Mount Sinai's bayfront seawall, protect the infatructure including perimeter road and drainage from the effects of flooding and sea level rise. Hospitals Mount Sinai Energy Center 2 Project in Planning Stage Wind,Flood,Flood /Storm Surge,Health,Pow er Failure Grant Awarded 3,964,239.00 95 12/1/2012 less than 6 months Retrofit the Energy facility with code plus wind, storm surge and flood enhancements above the current Florida building code standards. Hospitals Mount Sinai Greenspan Roof and Enclosures Funding Applied for Wind Grant Applied For 300,000.00 93 12/1/2012 unknown Remove roof and replace all roof top enclosures with Miami-Dade County Hurricane Zone rated systems. Hospitals Mount Sinai Harden Aventura Emergency Room Buildings Future Unfunded Project Wind 950,000.00 97 12/1/2012 unknown Harden Mount Sinai Avenutra and Emergency Room� including installing hurricane rated walls, windows, doors, concrete, stairwell pressurization and other systems to protect against high velocity, floor and storm surge events. Hospitals Mount Sinai Harden Child Care Building Future Unfunded Project Wind 750,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown Harden the Child Care Building � including installing hurricane rated walls, windows, doors, EIFS, stairwell pressurization and other systems to protect against high velocity wind, floor and storm surge events. Hospitals Mount Sinai Harden Knight MRI/Wien Center Building Future Unfunded Project Wind 3,750,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown Harden the Knight Buildings� including installing hurricane rated walls, windows, doors, EIFS, stairwell pressurization and other systems to protect against high velocity wind, floor and storm surge events and to raise valuable equipment. 34 of 93 200 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Hospitals Mount Sinai Harden Research and Education Building Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge,Flood,Healt h,Power Failure,Sea Level Rise,Security Breach,Storm Surge,Wind 750,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown Harden the Education and Research Buildings� including installing hurricane rated walls, windows, doors, EIFS, stairwell pressurization and other systems to protect against high velocity wind , floor and storm surge events. Hospitals Mount Sinai Mitigate Storm Drainage Project in Planning Stage Flood/Storm Surge Identified Grant Source 950,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown Mitigate the effects of storm surge and flooding by installing new drainage structures from buildings through surface lots, milling and resurfacing pavement to graduate surfaces and aid gravity water removal Hospitals Mount Sinai Mitigate the Impact of Storm Surge 25% complete Flood/Storm Surge,Flood,Sea Level Rise Department of Environmental Protection Grant Awarded 3,000,000.00 81 12/1/2012 2019 Install necessary storm drainage improvements Hospitals Mount Sinai Protect Critical Services Project in Planning Stage Flood State funding source Grant Applied For 2,000,000.00 0 12/1/2012 2020 Relocate critical services to above flood level locations. Hospitals Mount Sinai Protect Satellite Locations Future Unfunded Project Wind 1,450,000.00 91 12/1/2012 unknown Harden the Primary Care Satellite Building� including installing hurricane rated walls, windows, doors, EIFS, stairwell pressurization and other systems to protect against high velocity wind, floor and storm surge events and to raise valuable equipment. Hospitals Mount Sinai Protect the Cooling Towers Project in Planning Stage Multiple (specify in comments Column T) Other Internal Funding 3,000,000.00 84 12/1/2012 unknown Air conditioning is essential for acute care patient safety, stemming the spread of infection and preventing frail patients - such as newborns and elderly. Protect the existing cooling towers by elevating and/or reinforcing them for flood and wind hazard. Hospitals Mount Sinai Protect the Energy Center Facility Chillers 50% complete All Hazards Self funded Identified Funding Source 2,000,000.00 83 12/1/2012 Fall 2018 Retrofit and harden the Energy facility chillers to protect the supply of medically necessary A/C in the event of natural disaster. Hospitals Mount Sinai Protect the Oxygen Supply for the ER Future Unfunded Project Wind 1,300,000.00 81 12/1/2012 > 1 year Retrofit the Oxygen supply and redundant centralized ER energy supply with code plus wind, storm surge and flood enhancements above the current Florida building code standards. Hospitals Mount Sinai Relocate Operating Rooms Future Unfunded Project Wind 16,500,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown Relocate operating rooms, contents, equipment and critical functions from ground floor to wind rated protective above ground addition. Hospitals Mount Sinai Simon Building - Alzheimer’s Center Funding Applied for ,Flood,Health,Pow er Failure,Wind FEMA Public Assistance FEMA Hazard Mitigation Identified Funding Source 2,000,000.00 95 10/31/2017 Within two years This is the hazard mitigation of the roof windows doors and all enclosures of a building that houses the teaching physicians as well as the Alzheimer’s care center Hospitals Mount Sinai Storm Surge/ Wind Protection Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health (Select)100,000.00 86 1/14/2014 less than 6 months Building Storefront Flood Gates Municipalities Aventura Development of Floodplain Management Plan Future Unfunded Project Flood Potential Grant Applied For 0.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown The city is interested in obtaining grant funds to hire a consultant to develop a floodplain management plan. Ordinance No. 97- 19 created a Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance to enforce mitigation efforts throughout the city with regards to flooding. An ordinance is not a plan however and the creation of a floodplain management plan may benefit the community in a more positive "rating" within the Community Rating System, thereby allowing residents to obtain lower flood insurance premiums. The floodplain management plan is a requirement of NFIP if repetitive loss properties are greater than 10. The city currently has 2 repetitive loss properties. Municipalities Aventura NE 191st ST Imporvements 75% complete ,Flood/Storm Surge City funded project, but grant is being applied for reimbursement Funding Secured 711,962.00 53 6/23/2014 2017 Installation of drainage wells and ancillary drainage infrastructure to reduce stormwater pollutants to Biscayne Bay and reduce flood duration on City roadway. Municipalities Aventura NE 213th ST Sea Wall Restoration 75% complete ,Flood/Storm Surge City funded project but grant is being applied for reimbursement Funding Secured 1,387,000.00 76 7/14/2015 2017 Drainage improvements in areas prone to flooding and addressing the long term impacts of the rising sea levels by installing check valves in drainage outflows Municipalities Aventura NE 29 PL Phase II South Construction/Project Begun ,Flood City funded project.Funding Secured 721,000.00 51 6/23/2014 2016 Reconstruction of existing storm sewer system with exfiltration tenches and ancillary drainage and roadway infrastructure to reduce stormwater pollutants to Biscayne Bay. Municipalities Aventura Purchase Communications Information Equipment Future Unfunded Project Communications Failure (Select)0.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown During an emergency, it is critical that emergency personnel are able to communicate with one another. This project entails purchasing equipment, such as radios and additional cellular phones, to assist emergency personnel in responding to an emergency. The Aventura Police Department maintains a communication system that services the local community. Municipalities Bal Harbour Jetty Pedestrian walking surface repairs Project in Planning Stage ,Other Capital Projects Reserve Funding.Funding Secured 332,000.00 0 10/18/2016 4th Quarter of 2023 Repair and resurface the pedestrian walkway of the south jetty, Haulovers cut. Municipalities Bal Harbour Sewall and Dock Repair BHV park Project in Planning Stage ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Storm Surge Capital Projects Reserved Funding Funding Secured 55,000.00 0 10/18/2016 1 year Seawall and dock repair at Bal Harbour Village Park. Municipalities Bay Harbor Rehabilitation of the Broad Causeway Bridges 75% complete ,Flood/Storm Surge,Storm Surge Funding Secured 13,000,000.00 90 1/23/2015 May 2017 Broad Causeway Bridges rehabilitation of three bridges one of which is a drawbridge and this is an evacuation route/ 12 million from CIP and 1 Million from State Just awarded contract setting up staging areas 2015.01.23 Municipalities Biscayne Park Bucket Truck Future Unfunded Project Wild Fire,Wind (Select)95,000.00 75 12/1/2012 unknown Purchase bucket truck to facilitate trimming of canopy before and after hurricanes, reducing damage and debris volume. Also provides inexpensive portable location for overhead police surveillance of suspected criminal activities. Municipalities Biscayne Park Eighteen Foot Tall Wall along FEC right- of-way. Future Unfunded Project Security/Terroris m (Select)700,000.00 57 12/1/2012 unknown Reduces risk of damage to community by train wreck caused by sabotage or accident. With the potential for the new high speed rail this project is even more important. Municipalities Coral Gables 2506 Ponce de Leon (Historic) Shutters, Hardening , Conservator, roofing repairs/Replacement Future Unfunded Project ,Wind Post-Disaster Funding Program Identified Funding Source 40,000.00 58 11/30/2017 Unknown Install permanent hurricane window screens to minimize future losses from high wind. Structure hardening and windows. Municipalities Coral Gables 292 Miracle Mile Hardening (former Supercuts) Future Unfunded Project ,Wind Post-Disaster Funding Program Identified Funding Source 35,000.00 52 11/30/2017 Unknown Install permanent hurricane window screens to minimize future losses from high wind. Structure hardening and windows. Municipalities Coral Gables Acquire Sewer By-Pass Pump Future Unfunded Project ,Other Post Disaster Funding Source Identified Funding Source 100,000.00 86 11/29/2017 Unknown By-pass pump is needed to remove flood waters during and after major storms and sewer surcharges. 35 of 93 201 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Coral Gables Acquisition of City Hall Emergency Generator Future Unfunded Project Multiple Post-Disaster Funding Program Identified Funding Source 200,000.00 56 6/30/2010 Unknown Acquisition of a power generator to provide emergency power to the City Hall to ensure the accessability of computerized records in the event of storms, hurricanes and natural disasters. Municipalities Coral Gables Acquisition of City Pump Station G Emergency Generator Future Unfunded Project Multiple Post-Disaster Funding Programs Identified Funding Source 100,000.00 56 6/30/2010 Unknown Acquisition and installation of a power generator to provide emergency power to City Sanitary Sewer Pump Station G to prevent sewage over-flows, that would create health hazards, in the event of storms, hurricanes and natural disasters. Municipalities Coral Gables Acquisition of Coral Gables Public Works, Public Service and Automotive Department Facility Emergency Generator Project in Planning Stage Multiple Post-Disaster Funding Programs Identified Funding Source 530,000.00 79 6/30/2010 Unknown Acquisition of a power generator to provide emergency power to the Public Works facility which houses the utility telemetry and communications systems and is critical to pre and post man-made or natural disaster emergency operations. Structure hardening windows and shutters. Municipalities Coral Gables Basin Inflow and Infiltration Upgrade Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge Emergency Operations Flood Response and Post Flood Response Identified Funding Source 1,200,000.00 85 11/29/2017 Unknown An inflow and infiltration (I&I) program has been developed to reduce extraneous rain and groundwater that enters the City's wastewater collection system. It is anticipated that by implementing this program, the occurrence of Sanitary Sewer Overflows, which have a negative impact on the environment and public heath, will be reduced as well as capital, operating and maintenance costs. Municipalities Coral Gables City Hall Anex Hurricane Shutters Future Unfunded Project Wind Unkown 45,000.00 47 6/30/2010 Unknown Install permanent hurricane window screens to minimize future lossess from high wind. Structure hardening and windows. Municipalities Coral Gables Coral Gables Country Club Hurricane Shutters or windows, hardening Future Unfunded Project ,Wind Post-Disaster Funding Program Identified Funding Source 110,000.00 54 11/30/2017 Unknown Install permanent hurricane window screens to minimize future losses from high wind. Structure hardening and windows. Municipalities Coral Gables Elevating Sanitary Sewer Lift Stations Generator at Station D Project in Planning Stage Sea Level Rise Post-Disaster Funding Programs 100,000.00 62 12/23/2010 Unknown Elevate existing sanitary sewer lift station generator in flood prone area to comply with requirements of MDC DERM and to ensure the operation of the sanitary sewer lift station in the event of inland flooding from storm surge and wind driven rain. Municipalities Coral Gables Elevating Sanitary Sewer Lift Stations Generator at Station F Project in Planning Stage Sea Level Rise Post-Disaster Funding Programs 100,000.00 62 12/23/2010 Unknown Elevate existing sanitary sewer lift station generator in flood prone area to comply with requirements of MDC DERM and to ensure the operation of the sanitary sewer lift station in the event of inland flooding from storm surge and wind driven rain. Municipalities Coral Gables FIre Station #3 Hurricane Generator Future Unfunded Project ,Power Failure Post-Disaster Funding Programs Identified Funding Source 150,000.00 72 11/30/2017 Unknown Acquisition of a power generator to provide emergency power to the Fire Station #3 in the event of storms, hurricanes and natural disasters. Municipalities Coral Gables Fire Station 2 Mitigation Future Unfunded Project ,Other Capital Improvement Funding Secured 280,000.00 78 10/30/2014 July 2016 This Hazard Mitigation Project would provide for Hurricane Code Plus Apparatus Bay doors to Coral Gables Fire Station 2 (525 South Dixie Highway Coral Gables, Florida 33146.). This enhancement would provide for the continuous operation of this emergency management facility. Gables Fire Station 2 provides for sheltering of emergency response personnel; apart from fire fighters, during a hurricane activation. The current station was constructed in 1961 and the garage doors in our apparatus bay(s) need to be upgraded as they do not meet code nor provide for adequate protection of the structure. The current configuration has experienced a myriad of maintenance and reliability issues. The City has identified this project as a priority to maintaining continuity of operations. The requested enhancement is paramount to strengthening the City's emergency response capability. This project would provide for fire apparatus bay doors to Miami-Dade County Building Code "Plus" for a total of 8 doors at an estimated cost of 280,000 - (35,000/per door). Municipalities Coral Gables Granada Pro Shop Hurricane Shutters or windows, hardening Future Unfunded Project ,Wind Post-Disaster Funding Program Identified Funding Source 34,000.00 58 11/30/2017 Unknown Install permanent hurricane window screens to minimize future losses from high wind. Structure hardening and windows. Municipalities Coral Gables Historical City Hall Hurricane Shutters Future Unfunded Project Wind Post-Disaster Funding Program 500,000.00 47 6/30/2010 Unknown Install permanent hurricane window screens to minimize future lossess from high wind. Project includes shutters, windows and conservator. Municipalities Coral Gables Install Solar Panels at Youth Center Funding Secured ,Power Failure Unknown Identified Funding Source 472,000.00 76 11/29/2017 Unknown Provide renewable, low-carbon energy at the Youth he Center through installation of a solar photovoltaic (PV) array and battery backup. The Youth Center was analyzed as a potential location for installation of a solar PV array due to its 14,000 square foot available roof area. Since the Youth Center houses rescue recon staff during hurricanes, maintaining power at the facility is critical. It will provide power to roughly 15% or more of the building when the power is out. Costs are estimated at $472,000, with 10% of total costs allocated to design work and the rest to construction. Municipalities Coral Gables Merrick House Hurricane Shutters Future Unfunded Project ,Wind Post-Disaster Funding Program Identified Funding Source 40,000.00 58 11/30/2017 Unknown Install permanent hurricane window screens to minimize future losses from high wind. Structure hardening and windows. Municipalities Coral Gables Metal Freestanding Traffic Safety Signs & Trailer Future Unfunded Project Multiple Emergency Operations Flood Response and Post Flood Response 30,000.00 78 12/23/2010 Unknown Major storms result in power outages and obstructing debris on the roadways. Portable traffic safety signs will provide the safety needed for traffic control. An open trailer to house and transport the portable signs is needed to transport the portable traffic safety signs. Municipalities Coral Gables Miracle Theater Generator, Hurricane Shutters and Wiindows Future Unfunded Project ,Wind Post-Disaster Funding Program Identified Funding Source 168,000.00 53 11/30/2017 Unknown Acquisition of a power generator to provide emergency power to the Miracle Theater in the event of storms, hurricanes and natural disasters. Municipalities Coral Gables Passport Office Hurricane Shutters or Windows Future Unfunded Project ,Wind Post-Disaster Funding Program Identified Funding Source 35,000.00 58 11/30/2017 Unknown Install permanent hurricane window screens to minimize future losses from high wind. Structure hardening and windows. Municipalities Coral Gables Pump Station Cocoplum 1 Emergency Generator 50% complete ,Flood/Storm Surge,Health,Pow er Failure,Sea Level Rise Sanitary Sewer Fund Identified Funding Source 100,884.00 63 12/13/2016 18 Months Update of the sanitary sewer pump station including installation of emergency generator required by County regulations Municipalities Coral Gables Salvadore Tennis Center Windows and Hardening Future Unfunded Project ,Wind Post-Disaster Funding Program Identified Funding Source 25,000.00 58 11/30/2017 Unknown Install permanent hurricane window screens to minimize future losses from high wind. Structure hardening and windows. Municipalities Coral Gables San Pump Station's Electrical & Contral Panel and or Generator Future Unfunded Project ,Other Post-Disaster Funding Programs Identified Funding Source 490,000.00 82 11/29/2017 Unknown The City of Coral Gables acknowledges and understands its vulnerability to Sea Level Rise (SLR). As such, the City has identified adaptation strategies for SLR and its impacts on existing City infrastructure and other assets. Municipalities Coral Gables SAN Pump Station's Electrical & Control Panel and or Generator. Future Unfunded Project ,Other Post-Disaster Funding Program Identified Funding Source 191,440.00 82 11/29/2017 Unknown The City of Coral Gables acknowledges and understands its vulnerability to Sea Level Rise (SLR). As such, the City has identified adaptation strategies for SLR and its impacts on existing City infrastructure and other assets. Municipalities Coral Gables Storm Water Outfalls Project in Planning Stage Flood/Storm Surge Post-Disaster Funding Program 500,000.00 78 12/23/2010 September 2017 Rehabilitation of positive outfalls by cleaning and lining the system to prevent future blockage caused by build-up of bi-valve organisms critical to prevent flooding and health hazards 36 of 93 202 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Coral Gables Venetian Pool Hurricane shutters and hardening Future Unfunded Project ,Wind Post-Disaster Funding Program Identified Funding Source 38,000.00 56 11/30/2017 Unknown Install permanent hurricane window screens to minimize future losses from high wind. Structure hardening and windows. Municipalities Coral Gables Youth Center Hardening, windows/hurricane shutters Future Unfunded Project ,Wind Post-Disaster Funding Program Identified Funding Source 447,000.00 58 11/30/2017 Unknown Install permanent hurricane window screens to minimize future losses from high wind. Structure hardening and windows. Municipalities Cutler Bay Canal Bank Erosion Protection Funding Applied for Flood/Storm Surge was not funded through the 2016 legislative session. Town staff to resubmit request during 2017 legislative session. Grant Applied For 350,000.00 93 12/2/2012 Unknown Design and construct erosion protection structures and bank stabilization projects along town canals which are vulnerable to bank erosion due to storm surge or inland flooding. This project includes the removal of undesirable debris, trees, predominantly Australian pines and fichus, located in close proximity to the canal bank. These trees are prone to falling during a severe windstorm or hurricane causing flow obstructions as well as damage to the canal bank resulting in increased erosion. We must also schedule regular maintenance of town canals to restore flow. Municipalities Cutler Bay Canal Cleaning and Shaping Town wide Construction/Project Begun Flood budgeted anually, ongoing Funding Secured 750,000.00 82 12/2/2012 Unknown Dredging of the approximately 11 miles of inland canals located with the Town of Cutler Bay would restore depth and bottom contour. This restoration would directly impact the ability of the canal to hold tidal flooding and minimize flooding of surrounding properties during significant weather events. This dredging project would require funds for hydrographic surveys and bottom contours to determine the scope of work and cost. Dredging requires permits from the State, USACE, and DERM. A hydrographic survey will be required along with soil sampling of the proposed dredged materials. Mitigation work may be required to compensate for damaged ecosystems and will be determined by DERM prior to dredging. Municipalities Cutler Bay Caribbean Boulevard Bridge Project Project in Planning Stage ,Flood,Health,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge will be funded by the CITT Grant Applied For 3,000,000.00 95 11/14/2014 2015 Widening of the bridge to increase water flow and reduce the bottle neck effect. Project being done in conjunction with Miami- Dade County going out for bidding Summer 2015. Procurement process to begin Winter 2015. Municipalities Cutler Bay Community Emergency Response Teams (CERT)Other All Hazards FUNDED THROUGH THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Identified Funding Source 40,000.00 81 12/2/2012 unknown This project's goal is to establish CERTS for the town. When an emergency or disaster occurs at anytime and anyplace in the town, trained CERT volunteers will be ready and able to respond to save lives and protect property. CERT members will be able to do the greatest good for the greatest number after a disaster, while protecting them from becoming victims. This program will include but not be limited to basic medical treatment procedures, scene safely, securing utilities, and other hazards, and some rescue operations. Municipalities Cutler Bay Cutler Bay Waterway Conveyance Improvements Project in Planning Stage Flood Continue to seek out new potential funding sources Identified Funding Source 270,000.00 88 12/2/2012 Unknown Remove sediments from the Cutler Bay waterway that have built up over time which are causing bank flooding due to the major reduction in channel depth and cross section, as well as causing impassable locations to boat traffic. Preliminary tests show sediment as clean. Municipalities Cutler Bay Cutler Ridge Section 3 Drainage Improvement Funding Applied for ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Technologic al Disruption,Health Florida Small Cities Department of Economic Opportunity (CDBG) and Stormwater Utility Fund. Submitted as part of Legislative Priority 2018-06 Grant Applied For 1,015,160.00 83 02/07/2017 18 months The Town of Cutler Bay is requesting $750,000 in funding from the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity's Small Cities CDBG Program under the "Neighborhood Revitalization" category. The Town will install approximately 2,400 linear feet in one of the Town's residential neighborhoods on Town owned and maintained roadways. The project boundaries are: • Montego Bay Drive, from Anchor Road to Coral Sea Road • Nicaragua Drive, from Anchor Road to Coral Sea Road • Coral Sea Road, from Montego Bay Drive to Nicaragua Drive (at Gulfstream Elementary School) • Condado Road, from Montego Bay Drive to Nicaragua Drive • Anchor Road, from Montego Bay Drive to Nicaragua Drive • Puerto Rico Drive, from SW 103 Court to Anchor The Town will implement best management practices during the project to include; installation of a 2,400 LF exfiltration trench (36" Diameter), and new catch basins. Following drainage installation, the identified streets will be paved, including pavement markings and signage. Municipalities Cutler Bay Debris Removal Funding Secured All Hazards Will apply for Grants as necessary Identified Funding Source 400,000.00 89 12/2/2012 Unknown The town presently maintains a list of contractors that have agreed to provide debris removal services following a disaster. The town would develop a Comprehensive Debris Clearance (CDC) plan that would list the names and phone numbers of debris removal contractors, identify potential debris storage sites, removal methods, and provide for special programs. Contracts would be negotiated in advance and monetary damages would be due to the town if the contractor fails to perform. The study also would analyze how the town could best coordinate debris removal activities with related post-disaster service performed by Miami-Dade County. The town welcomes debris removal assistance along federal, state and county roadways, but recognizes that it will need to provide its own service along for most of the smaller, local roadways within the town. Municipalities Cutler Bay Develop a Debris Plan Project in Planning Stage All Hazards Town has budgeted FY 2016-2017 for an RFP for Debris monitoring. Funding Secured 80,000.00 85 12/2/2012 Unknown Develop and implement town wide debris removal plan using G.P.S. for data acquisition and G.I.S. for mapping. If the town's proposed debris management plan will coordinate the efforts of the Miami-Dade County's Coordinated Debris Clearance (CDC) Program Municipalities Cutler Bay Drainage Improvements - Bel Aire Section 1.1 Sub-Basin Future Unfunded Project Flood Will Continue to seek out new grant opportunities. Ongoing Grant Applied For 820,000.00 96 12/1/2012 Unknown The purpose of the Town of Cutler Bay Stormwater Master Plan was to identify opportunities to protect surface water quality and reduce flooding within the limits of the Town of Cutler Bay, Florida. The following priority drainage sub-basins was identified and studied as part of the Stormwater Master Plan: Bel Aire Section 1.1 Sub-Basin. Municipalities Cutler Bay Drainage Improvements - Bel Aire Section 1.2 Sub-Basin Future Unfunded Project Flood The Town of Cutler Bay will continue to seek out new potential grant opportunities Grant Applied For 660,000.00 85 12/1/2012 Unknown The purpose of the Town of Cutler Bay Stormwater Master Plan was to identify opportunities to protect surface water quality and reduce flooding within the limits of the Town of Cutler Bay, Florida. The following priority drainage sub-basins was identified and studied as part of the Stormwater Master Plan: Bel Aire Section 1.2 Sub-Basin Municipalities Cutler Bay Drainage Improvements - Bel Aire Section 6 Sub-Basin Future Unfunded Project Flood Town will continue seeking grants for future projects Grant Applied For 310,000.00 83 12/1/2012 Unknown The purpose of the Town of Cutler Bay Stormwater Master Plan was to identify opportunities to protect surface water quality and reduce flooding within the limits of the Town of Cutler Bay, Florida. The following priority drainage sub-basins was identified and studied as part of the Stormwater Master Plan: Bel Aire Section 6 Sub-Basin. 37 of 93 203 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Cutler Bay Drainage Improvements - Cutler Ridge Section 5 Sub-Basin Future Unfunded Project Flood The Town of Cutler Bay will continue to seek out new potential grant opportunities Grant Applied For 1,580,000.00 88 12/1/2012 Unknown The purpose of the Town of Cutler Bay Stormwater Master Plan was to identify opportunities to protect surface water quality and reduce flooding within the limits of the Town of Cutler Bay, Florida. The following priority drainage sub-basins was identified and studied as part of the Stormwater Master Plan: Cutler Ridge Section 5 Sub-Basin. Municipalities Cutler Bay Drainage Improvements - Manta Drive 75% complete ,Flood Stormwater Utility Funds; applied for FDOT Tap Grant. Funding Secured 488,600.00 73 10/31/2016 Unknown This project has been identified in the Town’s Flood Mitigation Plan, Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan and Townwide Pavement and Sidewalk Assessment Study. Both the Flood Mitigation Plan and Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans included a series of public involvement meetings. Residents have expressed concern about this local road (see email from resident in attachments). The roads surrounding this one street all have sidewalks, tree canopy with landscaping for pedestrian buffer and valley gutters. The goal of this project is to provide the residents of Manta Drive with the same quality roadway as their neighbors Municipalities Cutler Bay Drainage Improvements - Pine Tree Manor Sub-Basin Future Unfunded Project Flood The Town of Cutler Bay will continue to seek new potential grant opportunities. Ongoing Grant Applied For 390,000.00 87 12/1/2012 unknown The purpose of the Town of Cutler Bay Stormwater Master Plan was to identify opportunities to protect surface water quality and reduce flooding within the limits of the Town of Cutler Bay, Florida. The following priority drainage sub-basins was identified and studied as part of the Stormwater Master Plan: Pine Tree Manor Sub-Basin Municipalities Cutler Bay Drainage Improvements - Point Royale Section 5 Sub-Basin Other Flood Stormwater Utiltity Fund, applied for through State Legislative Submital 2016-01, not funded Identified Funding Source 360,000.00 94 12/1/2012 Unknown The purpose of the Town of Cutler Bay Stormwater Master Plan was to identify opportunities to protect surface water quality and reduce flooding within the limits of the Town of Cutler Bay, Florida. The following priority drainage sub-basins was identified and studied as part of the Stormwater Master Plan: Port Royale Section 5 Sub-Basin. Municipalities Cutler Bay Drainage Improvements - Saga Bay Section 1.1 Sub-Basin Future Unfunded Project Flood The Town of Cutler Bay will continue to seek out new potential grant opportunities. Ongoing Grant Applied For 800,000.00 90 12/1/2012 Unknown The purpose of the Town of Cutler Bay Stormwater Master Plan was to identify opportunities to protect surface water quality and reduce flooding within the limits of the Town of Cutler Bay, Florida. The following priority drainage sub-basins was identified and studied as part of the Stormwater Master Plan:Saga Bay Section 1.1 Sub-Basin Municipalities Cutler Bay Drainage Improvements - Saga Bay Section 1.2 Sub-Basin Other Flood Submitted in 2016 State Legislative Submital, #2016-02, not funded. Will re-submit in 2017. Funding Secured 300,000.00 82 12/1/2012 unknown The purpose of the Town of Cutler Bay Stormwater Master Plan was to identify opportunities to protect surface water quality and reduce flooding within the limits of the Town of Cutler Bay, Florida. The following priority drainage sub-basins was identified and studied as part of the Stormwater Master Plan: Saga Bay Section 1.2 Sub-Basin Municipalities Cutler Bay Drainage Improvements - Saga Bay Section 1.6 Sub-Basin Future Unfunded Project Flood The Town of Cutler Bay will continue to seek out new potential grant opportunities. Ongoing Grant Applied For 170,000.00 94 12/1/2012 Unknown The purpose of the Town of Cutler Bay Stormwater Master Plan was to identify opportunities to protect surface water quality and reduce flooding within the limits of the Town of Cutler Bay, Florida. The following priority drainage sub-basins was identified and studied as part of the Stormwater Master Plan: Saga Bay Section 1.6 Sub-Basin Municipalities Cutler Bay Drainage Improvements - Saga Bay Section 1.7 Sub-Basin Funding Applied for Flood The Town of Cutler Bay will continue to seek out new potential grant opportunities. Submitted as part of the Legislative Priority Project # 2018-07. Ongoing Grant Applied For 670,000.00 87 12/1/2012 Unknown The purpose of the Town of Cutler Bay Stormwater Master Plan was to identify opportunities to protect surface water quality and reduce flooding within the limits of the Town of Cutler Bay, Florida. The following priority drainage sub-basins was identified and studied as part of the Stormwater Master Plan: Saga Bay Section 1.7 Sub-Basin Municipalities Cutler Bay Drainage Improvements - Saga Bay Section 1.8 Sub-Basin Future Unfunded Project Flood The Town of Cutler Bay will continue to seek out new potential grant opportunities. ongoing Grant Applied For 240,000.00 90 12/1/2012 Unknown The purpose of the Town of Cutler Bay Stormwater Master Plan was to identify opportunities to protect surface water quality and reduce flooding within the limits of the Town of Cutler Bay, Florida. The following priority drainage sub-basins was identified and studied as part of the Stormwater Master Plan: Saga Bay Section 1.8 Sub-Basin Municipalities Cutler Bay Drainage Improvements - SW 87th Avenue Sub-Basin Future Unfunded Project Flood The Town of Cutler Bay will continue to seek out new potential grant opportunities. Ongoing Grant Applied For 1,000,000.00 90 12/1/2012 Unknown The purpose of the Town of Cutler Bay Stormwater Master Plan was to identify opportunities to protect surface water quality and reduce flooding within the limits of the Town of Cutler Bay, Florida. The following priority drainage sub-basins was identified and studied as part of the Stormwater Master Plan: SW 87th Avenue Sub-Basin. Municipalities Cutler Bay Drainage Improvements - SW 97th Avenue Sub-Basin Future Unfunded Project Flood Will identify new grant sources and apply this fiscal year Grant Applied For 1,200,000.00 80 12/1/2012 Unknown The purpose of the Town of Cutler Bay Stormwater Master Plan was to identify opportunities to protect surface water quality and reduce flooding within the limits of the Town of Cutler Bay, Florida. The following priority drainage sub-basins was identified and studied as part of the Stormwater Master Plan: SW 97th Avenue Sub-Basin Municipalities Cutler Bay Emergency Portable Air Conditioner Units Construction/Project Begun All Hazards continue identifying and applying for new grant sources Grant Applied For 120,000.00 81 12/2/2012 Unknown Purchase emergency portable air conditioner units for computer rooms and office areas for all essential operating areas. Town Hall serves as the town's emergency operations center, maintains computer systems and services. The portable air conditioner units would prevent these systems and services from damage and malfunction. Four units are necessary. Municipalities Cutler Bay Flood Insurance Research Project Project in Planning Stage Flood will continue to seek out new grant opportunities Grant Applied For 90,000.00 85 12/2/2012 Unknown This project will be part of the work required for the Community Rating System (CRS) and will involve the research of town properties, which do not have flood insurance and the reasons therefore. This effort would result in an action program designed to increase the number of properties covered by the flood insurance. The project will also review the validity of the BFE as reflected on the FIRM and explore the possibilities of variable flood insurance rates that distinguish within the same flood zone between properties that are flood prone and vulnerable to flooding hazards and those which are not and/or have taken steps to correct the potential problem. 38 of 93 204 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Cutler Bay Flood Zone Data GIS System 75% complete Flood current phase(s) budget through our Stormwater Utility fund Identified Funding Source 140,000.00 88 12/2/2012 Unknown This project will fund the creation of a GIS system to support several activities of the town's National Flood Insurance Community Rating System program including mapping, annual outreach and notification, and the maintenance of all flood zone designations and other data for all real property folio numbers within the town. In addition, the project will integrate town's data into Miami- Dade County's GIS system tailoring products generated for town use. The additional information generated by this system will be essential for the preparation of detailed flood mitigation reports and allow users to track conditions by specific property location. This data will then be utilized to clearly identify and designate low lying areas, which will streamline flood prevention efforts when designing new systems and upgrading existing drainage systems. Municipalities Cutler Bay Municipal AM Emergency Radio Broadcast Station Construction/Project Begun All Hazards Continue identifying new potential grant sources Grant Applied For 85,000.00 72 12/2/2012 Unknown Allow issuing of timely information 24/7. Has capacity broadcast, operate without grid power for 2 days, store repeat messages and ability to allow instant timely broadcast messages. Municipalities Cutler Bay Portable Traffic Control Signs 50% complete Power Failure Continue identifying and applying for new grant sources Grant Applied For 200,000.00 71 12/2/2012 Unknown Effective and efficient communication is vital to allow for the rapid evacuation of citizens prior to the impact of a hurricane in Cutler Bay. With a residential population of 41,579 people and a commuter population that at least doubles the affected population during the work week, traffic jams are a certainty. Portable traffic control signs that provide scrolling text messages would allow traffic to be directed to alternative routes and to provide other vital information to motorists. The portable signs have other uses besides assisting in evacuations: they can be used to display information during events such as fire/rescue emergencies, hazardous material spills, special events and terrorist incidents. These signs display a test message that is easily programmed into the unit and can be moved using most any town vehicle with a trailer hitch. The town of Cutler Bay would purchase 4 of these units at a cost of about $50,000 each, plus additional trailer hitches for town vehicles. Municipalities Cutler Bay Preventive Pruning of Existing Town Tree Inventory Funding Secured Wind Budgeted on going for F.Y. 2016 - 2017 RFP# 16-02 Tree trimming Identified Funding Source 285,000.00 82 12/2/2012 Unknown This project's purpose is twofold: to minimize storm generated debris and protect infrastructure from tree related storm damage. Studies show that by practicing proper structural pruning methods such as appropriate crown reduction and canopy thinning, tree and limb failures are reduced during storm events. Therefore, properly pruned trees produce less debris and minimize infrastructure damage. This project proposes to create a program that provides regularly scheduled pruning of trees planted by the town within the right of way in order to provide structural integrity and thereby mitigate and clean-up costs and property damage caused by weather events. The department would utilize local contractor services to accomplish project goals. All pruning performed will conform to the International Society of Arboriculture and ANSI A-300 standards. Municipalities Cutler Bay Reduction of Floating Debris 25% complete Flood budgeted, ongoing Funding Secured 60,000.00 85 12/2/2012 Unknown This proposal will demonstrate the usefulness of low-cost best management practice (BMP) devices in reducing the volume of floating debris that is being washed into Cutler Bay's canals. This floating refuse eventually ends up in the federally protected marine sanctuary of Biscayne Bay. The objective is to start a remedial program in Cutler Bay's urban drainage basin by installing or retrofitting the existing curb inlets with prefabricated curb grates and leaf collecting baskets. These BMP are expected to reduce the volume of floating trash and debris by as much as 20% and also prevent the clogging of the town stormwater system. Municipalities Cutler Bay Removal of Australian Pines and other Exotics Construction/Project Begun Wind included in F.Y. 2016- 2017 Budget, also putting out for Bid an RFP#16-02 for Townwide Tree trimming Funding Secured 100,000.00 84 12/2/2012 unknown Debris removal after a storm is an expensive and time-consuming process. Fallen trees can delay the re-entry process by blocking access to roads and properties. This project would create a permanent ongoing tree removal program. It would ensure removal of exotic trees on public rights of way. The exotics would be replaced by appropriate native trees that will enhance the town's tree canopy. The town will maintain the new native trees. Municipalities Cutler Bay Storm Shutters for Town Buildings Funding Applied for Wind WILL CONTINUE TO SEEK OUT NEW GRANTS Grant Applied For 120,000.00 91 12/2/2012 Unknown This project would install hurricane shutters and reinforced doors on all municipal buildings not already so protected. The shutters and doors are designed to prevent hurricane force winds and debris from breaking the windows and allowing wind, water and debris to enter the structures. The proposed modifications would allow these buildings to not only survive the hurricane with less damage to the structure and the property stored inside, but also reduce the financial impact to the town. Municipalities Cutler Bay Storm Water Outfalls Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge budgeted annually through the Stormwater Utility Fund, ongoing Funding Secured 500,000.00 86 12/2/2012 Unknown Clean and service line positive outfalls to prevent future blockage caused by build-up of bivalve organisms throughout the town's 11 miles of canals. Municipalities Cutler Bay Town Hall/EOC Hardening Project (Exterior Walls) Project in Planning Stage Wind Continued grant application(s) and have budgeted design for this fiscal year. Submitted in State Legislative Submital for funding 2016-08. Town will resubmit in 2017. Grant Applied For 728,000.00 77 12/2/2012 Unknown Town Hall / Emergency Operation Center Building's glazing, the building also has an Exterior Insulating Finish System (EIFS) as its main enclosing system below the glazing. The current system will not meet either current wind or missile impact of any sort. This system will need to be completely replaced is the building envelope is to meet current hardening/category 5 storm by combining the structural reinforcement of the glazing with that of the wall below the cost of replacing this system with an approved exterior wind rated system could be mitigated. Municipalities Cutler Bay Town Hall/EOC Hardening Project (Impact Resistant Windows) Project in Planning Stage Wind Design has been budgeted for F.Y. 2016 - 2017 Grant Applied For 630,000.00 82 12/2/2012 Unknown Town Hall / Emergency Operation Center Building existing exterior glazing � proposed scope would be to retrofit structural elements to reinforce the existing curtain wall system and install transparent interior polyester laminate which would be secured to the existing reinforced frames. Municipalities Cutler Bay Town Hall/EOC Hardening Project (Mechanical HVAC System)25% complete All Hazards Design has begun under PO 1147 issued to TLC Engineering Grant Applied For 228,000.00 77 12/2/2012 unknown Town Hall / Emergency Operation Center's the building envelope is composted of the roof and the roof equipment. Reroofing the 13,000 would cost approximately $158,000. Reinforcement of the building rooftop mechanical systems would include bracing, wind barriers and replacement of some outdated minor equipment. An estimate for this work would be approximately $70,000. Municipalities Cutler Bay Town Hall/EOC HVAC System 25% complete Wind Design has begun under PO 1147 issued to TLC Engineering Grant Applied For 610,000.00 75 12/2/2012 Unknown Town Hall / Emergency Operation Center's current HVAC system cannot be operated during a storm event. Therefore, a new per floor dedicated HVAC system (a conventional direct expansion system with roof mounted air handler) would need to be installed for the first two floors which are designated as the EOC facility. The approximate cost for providing this retrofit system of HVAC would be approximately $275,000.00 per floor. Further, a chase/mechanical space would be required of approximately 200 SF per floor. 39 of 93 205 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Doral Acquisition of Emergency Generators Future Unfunded Project Power Failure City of Doral General Fund Identified Funding Source 300,000.00 72 September 30, 2018 This project would involve the acquisition of power generators to support critical facilities and operations throughout the City. This is a mitigation project that ensures the continued operation of critical City facilities and the appropriate level-of-service for City residents during and after a disaster event. These generators would supply the following facilities: Parks. Quantity: 2. Supply power to Morgan Levy Park and Doral Legacy Park that could serve as distribution centers. Public Works Dept. Quantity: 25. Supplies power for the operation of traffic control signals during power outage. Municipalities Doral Acquisition of Emergency Vehicles and Equipment Future Unfunded Project Multiple General Funds - Potential Identified Funding Source 1,600,000.00 50 Unknown This project would involve the acquisition of vehicles and support equipment to access and mitigate affected areas throughout the City. These vehicles will be assigned to the following departments: Wastewater Vac-Truck - Public Works - Qty: 1 - Purpose: Clean sewer debris. 4WD Backhoe w/ Clamp Bucket - Public Works -Qty: 1 - Purpose: Clear Debris. Front Loader w/ Clamp Bucket - Public Works - Qty: 2 - Purpose: Clear Debris. Stormwater Vac-Truck - Public Works - Qty. 1 - Purpose: Clean Storm Drains. 50 Cubic Yard Roll-off Containers - Public Works - Qty: 2 - Purpose: Debris clean-up/pick-up. Water Filtration Truck - City Hall (Operations Center) - Qty: 1 - Purpose: Source of Potable Water. Ice Machines - City Hall (Operations Center) - Qty: 2 - Purpose: Emergency Operations. Municipalities Doral Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Relocation/Expansion Project Future Unfunded Project ,Other,Flood 404 HMGP Program Identified Funding Source 500,000.00 77 10/31/2017 FY 2018-19 The Doral Police Department Headquarters (DPD-HQ) hosts the City's temporary Emergency Operations Center (EOC). Although the DPD-HQ is located in a SFHA, the City constructed the HQ to 3.75 feet above the BFE, mitigating the infrastructure and allowing operations without interruption from flood waters. The temporary EOC location room is on the ground floor of the building. However, this room does not have the adequate size needed to accommodate the number of City and other agencies’ staff to perform the functions of the EOC properly and quickly navigate emergencies. The EOC needs to be relocated to the second floor of the building. The Doral Police Department has recently extended the HQ square footage and already has an unused area on the second floor (currently storing overstock furniture). The 1,300 square-foot room needs electrical installation, HVAC, phones, data cables, new furniture, computers, TV monitors and all necessary equipment to run the EOC including incorporating the video resources provided by traffic cameras. Adjacent to the EOC room, there is the need to build additional rooms for meetings with elected officials, staff members and contractors. Approximately 730 square feet of shell space may be available for this purpose. The EOC will also need noise and echo reduction measures to ease communications. In addition, this new area has the advantage of being in close proximity to restrooms, showers and locker rooms which will accommodate personnel assigned to the EOC. Moving and expanding the EOC to the second floor of the building will increase its capacity. The building has been built under strict Florida Building Codes and is suitable to sustain Category 5 hurricane winds. The relocation will make this a permanent EOC with the advantage of no time delays setting up the EOC. The expansion of the location will facilitate activating the EOC not only for small-scale events but also for Level 1 natural events like the one we just experienced with Hurricane Irma. Since 9/11, emergency management functions have changed over the years to include man- made incidents such as terrorist attacks, active shooters, etc. The size of the current room does not provide a suitable space to conduct emergency response operations for a large-scale incident and particularly if the incident has a long lasting impact in the Doral area. Increasing the City of Doral and Doral Police Department capability to run a better-equipped EOC and one with more resiliency and the capacity to handle the personnel required for emergency response and recovery will help local government serve the public more efficiently in this growing community. Municipalities Doral Installation of Storm Shutters at City of Doral Park Facilities Future Unfunded Project Wind City of Doral General Fund Identified Funding Source 75,000.00 56 September 30, 2020 This project involves the installation of storm shutters at the Parks & Recreation Buildings. The protection of these facilities is critical to ensure continuity of City services. Municipalities Doral Installation of Transfer Switch at Morgan Levy Park for Emergency Power Project in Planning Stage Power Failure City of Doral General Fund Identified Funding Source 50,000.00 75 September 30, 2017 This project will provide for the installation of a transfer switch to Morgan Levy Park located in the City of Doral. The facility was constructed to withstand category four hurricane winds, as a result this facility will be utilized as a location for the City to distribute and administer both force account labor as well as volunteers after an event. This is a mitigation project that ensures the continued operation of critical city facilities and the appropriate level-of-service for City residents during and after a disaster event. Municipalities Doral NW 33 St. from NW 82 Ave. to NW 79 Ave. Roadway Improvements Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge City General Fund - Secured Identified Funding Source 1,600,000.00 72 1/5/2015 12/31/2018 This project consists of roadway improvements on NW 33 St. between NW 82 Ave. and NW 79 Ave. Improvements include roadway reconstruction, lighting improvements, installation of new curb and gutter, sidewalks, and construction of new self contained drainage system, consisting of interconnected inlets, manholes, and exfiltration trenches. The curb and gutter will allow the stormwater runoff from the roadway to be completely captured and treated through new exfiltration trenches before being allowed to percolate into the ground and recharge the aquifer. Municipalities Doral NW 41 St. from NW 79 Ave. to NW 87 Ave. Roadway Improvements Funding Secured ,Flood/Storm Surge General Fund. Private Developer/Impact Fee Credit Identified Funding Source 1,850,000.00 68 1/5/2015 6/30/2018 This project consists of roadway improvements on NW 41 St. between NW 87 Ave. and NW 79 Ave. Improvements include roadway reconstruction, lighting improvements, installation of new curb and gutter, sidewalks, and construction of new self contained drainage system, consisting of interconnected inlets, manholes, and exfiltration trenches. Guardrail will be installed within the project limits to protect traffic from Dressels Canal hazard. The curb and gutter will allow the stormwater runoff from the roadway to be completely captured and treated through new exfiltration trenches before being allowed to percolate into the ground and recharge the aquifer. The drainage improvements as part of this project will advance the South Florida Water Management District’s Strategic Plan by protecting the swales, groundwater, and the Dressels Canal from potential contaminated stormwater runoff as well as to prevent untreated stormwater from the roadway to sheetflow into the swales and the Dressels Canal. The project will also improve safety and comfort for motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians as a result of the improvements to the drainage system. Municipalities Doral Point of Distribution Future Unfunded Project Multiple City of Doral General Fund Identified Funding Source 700,000.00 53 September 30, 2020 This project will include the construction and equipment for a building at Doral Central Park that will serve as the City of Doral "Point of Distribution" center. This facility will serve as a center for information, services and supplies following disaster. Municipalities Doral Pump Station to Address Repetitive Flooding Losses Other Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge Private - Potential Identified Funding Source 5,838,000.00 58 Unknown "Tile District" Pump Station. The installation of an improved storm water conveyance system and pump station required to relieve flooded streets, storm sewers, and properties that have shown repetitive loss during flooding events. Due to contamination in the area and the prohibition of exfiltration trenches, this pumps station is necessary to provide water transmission capabilities in case of severe flooding; thereby decreasing damage to low lying areas. 40 of 93 206 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Doral Retrofit of Traffic Signals to Include Transfer Switches Future Unfunded Project Power Failure City of Doral General Fund Identified Funding Source 140,000.00 79 September 30, 2017 This project will provide for the installation of transfer switches for the traffic signals at each of the major intersections in the City of Doral. This will allow the use of generators to keep the signals operating during power outages and reduce the traffic fatalities due to absence of signalization. Municipalities Doral Stormwater Improvements 5-Year CIP: Year 4 Construction/Project Begun ,Flood Funded by City's Stormwater Fee Identified Funding Source 1,047,694.00 84 1/7/2015 July 2018 5 Year Stormwater Improvements Capital Improvement Plan developed after the 2013 Stormwater Master Plan (SWMP) Update. SWMP Update provided a 5 year capital improvement plan for stormwater improvements throughout the City. Through the analysis performed on the 2013 SWMP Update problem areas throughout the City were identified. The City was then divided into sub-basin and the sub-basins were ranked. Conceptual designs and cost estimates were prepared for stormwater improvements proposed on highest ranking sub-basins. Stormwater improvements were proposed for residential and commercial areas to mitigate flooding and repetitive losses. 5 Year CIP: Year 4 - Estimated Cost: $1,047,694 Locations: Sub Basin D-3: NW 30 St., between NW 82 Ave. & NW 79 Ave.: - STATUS: CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 2017 ($426,741) Sub Basin D-3: NW 29 St., between NW 82 Ave. & NW 79 Ave.: - STATUS: CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 2017 ($426,741) Sub Basin D-79 Ave.: NW 79 Ave., between NW 30 St. & NW 36 St.: - STATUS: DESIGN ONGOING Sub Basin A-2: NW 21 St., between NW 82 Ave. & NW 79 Ave. - STATUS: DESIGN ONGOING Sub Basin A-2: NW 79 Ave. & NW 14 St. - STATUS: DESIGN ONGOING Municipalities Doral Stormwater Improvements 5-Year CIP: Year 5 Funding Secured ,Flood Stormwater fees.Identified Funding Source 1,398,536.00 84 1/7/2015 September 2018 5 Year Stormwater Improvements Capital Improvement Plan developed after the 2013 Stormwater Master Plan (SWMP) Update. SWMP Update provided a 5 year capital improvement plan for stormwater improvements throughout the City. Through the analysis performed on the 2013 SWMP Update problem areas throughout the City were identified. The City was then divided into sub-basin and the sub-basins were ranked. Conceptual designs and cost estimates were prepared for stormwater improvements proposed on highest ranking sub-basins. Stormwater improvements were proposed for residential and commercial areas to mitigate flooding and repetitive losses. 5 Year CIP: Year 5 - Estimated Cost: $1,398,536 Locations: NW 82 Ave., between NW 12 St. & NW 25 St.: - STATUS: DESIGN ONGOING NW 21 St., west of NW 82 Ave. - STATUS: DESING ONGOING NW 14 St., west of NW 82 Ave. Municipalities El Portal El Jardin Roadway & Pump System Future Unfunded Project ,Flood Funding not yet secured 2,300,000.00 64 01/12/2018 6 Months from funding date Roads in the village along the section "El Jardin" experienced subsurface damage due to the long term flooding caused by hurricane Irma. The installation of a water control system and redoing the damaged roadways with an impreoved infrastructure would reduce the risk and damages from future flooding. Municipalities El Portal Little River Canal (Canal C-7) Seawall Remediation Project Project in Planning Stage ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge Unknown/None 5,000,000.00 61 12/17/2013 unknown The C-7 Canal serves two main purposes: 1) to provide flood protection and drainage for the basin, and 2) to maintain adequate groundwater table elevation to prevent saltwater intrusion. The Canal was designed to provide runoff conveyance from a 100- year storm; however, since mush of this basin was agricultural during the design and construction of the conveyance, the current capacity may be inadequate due to significant residential and commercial development in the drainage basin. Currently, SFWMD operates two control structures in the C-7 basin. The Village has recognized the need for a proactive approach to managing flooding problems. While the capacity of the C-7 Canal may be inadequate to handle the volume of runoff it currently receives, this problem is exacerbated by the Village’s outdated drainage system, which does not have the capacity to handle and treat the volume of runoff at various locations throughout the Village. As a result, the Village experiences flooding after even minor storm events. This project involves the reconstruction and upgrade of the existing seawall and back of the C-7 Canal for the entire length of the Village of El Portal Municipalities El Portal NW 86 & 87 st Pump Station Future Unfunded Project ,Flood Funding not yet secured.775,000.00 65 01/12/2018 One Year From Project Start Roads subsurface damage due to the long term flooding. Adding a water control pump system and taking care of the road damages experienced from hurricane Irma, would lessen the likelyhood and the impact of future flooding in the area. Municipalities El Portal Village of El Portal Stormwater Improvements 25% complete ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge Capital Improvement 10,000,000.00 67 12/17/2013 unknown This project is part of the Villages Stormwater Mast Plan prepared in 2002. Phase I – IV was completed between 2007-2012, which consisted of the installation of gravity stormwater piping and the installation of outfalls for installed systems and future phased systems. The Village is situated geographically at the northeastern portion of Miami – Dade County with Biscayne Boulevard bordering the eastern limits of the Village, Interstate 95 bordering the western limits and the C-7 Canal (Little River) bordering the Village’s southern limit. Adequate stomwater drainage is one the fundamental concerns to the prosperity and livelihood of the community. The Village’s goal is to enhance its stormwater infrastructure, while protecting and preserving its natural resources. Also, the Village’s wastewater needs to rely entirely on septic tank and drain field technology. The performances of these systems are typically hindered by adverse rising groundwater conditions caused by severe storm events. Municipalities FlCity Additional Water Tower Future Unfunded Project Wind,Power Failure,Health CDBG Identified Funding Source 2,000,000.00 58 12/3/2012 > 1 year The city needs an additional water tower for additional storage capacity. During hurricanes and electrical power outages, the existing water tower goes on backup generation to keep the water moving in the distribution system, but the pumps are unable to push water into the tower to keep the water pressure at optimum levels. An additional water tower would provide adequate storage in the event of an incident where the power was down for an extended period of time. Municipalities FlCity Backup for the City Drinking Water System Future Unfunded Project Wind,Health CDBG Identified Funding Source 85,837.00 56 12/2/2012 > 1 year The city has discussed an inter-connection to the water system operated by Miami-Dade County. The connection would provide a backup source of drinking water to the city should the city's water treatment plant suffer damage or should the city's elevated tanks be damaged in a hurricane. 41 of 93 207 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities FlCity Demolition of Dilapidated Structures Future Unfunded Project Wind,Health CRA, CDBG > 1 year Identified Funding Source 500,000.00 56 12/12/2012 2020 Because of the housing crisis, there are a number of housing structures in the City that have been abandoned by property owners. These structures are rapidly deteriorating and could become a hazard in the event of a major storm. Because they are not being maintained, some have been vandalized and are frequently open to the elements. These housing structures need to be demolished to prevent parts of them from becoming debris in a major wind event. Municipalities FlCity Drainage at the Depot and Pioneer Museum Future Unfunded Project Flood,Health legislative appropriation or HMGp Identified Funding Source 500,000.00 54 12/11/2012 > 1 year The City owns the Pioneer Museum and the Historic Depot on North Krome Avenue. Because of the elevation of US 1, the ground around the Depot and Museum will often be covered with water for an extended period following a major rain event. Since the parking is a grassed area surrounding the building, the parking area cannot be used until the ground dries out. The City desires to construct a porous surface parking area with French drains to deal with the flooding and parking issues simultaneously. Municipalities FlCity Drainage for State Farmers Market Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Health,Floo d/Storm Surge,Other State Appropriation > 1 year Identified Funding Source 2,000,000.00 63 12/11/2015 Before next 50 year Storm The State Farmers Market in Florida City continues to flood in a significant rainfall event. See attached pictures Municipalities FlCity Potable Water Gate Valve Project Future Unfunded Project Health,Flood CDBG and Legislative appropriation Identified Funding Source 850,000.00 60 12/5/2012 > 1 year The City provides potable water to the residents and businesses located in Florida City. Much of the system is older and the gate valves in some areas have failed. When a gate valve fails, the City can no longer shut off the water to a small area in the event of damage to a water line. Instead, a larger geographic area must be closed off during the repair period causing many more people to be without drinking water. The safety issue arises related to fire hydrants. There is a likelihood of greater damage from a fire during these times when closing gate valves causes a discontinuance of water service to large areas. Installing more gate valves and replacing those that are frozen open will provide a safety benefit to our community. Municipalities FlCity Public Building Retrofit Future Unfunded Project Wind,Flood/Storm Surge Legislative appropriation or future HMGP funding Identified Funding Source 500,000.00 75 12/7/2012 > 1 year The city owns several buildings that need to be shuttered to protect them from wind damage in the event of a major hurricane. The buildings are the Pioneer Museum and Depot Buildings, the city-owned building occupied by the Department of Juvenile Justice, and the city Water Treatment Plant. Municipalities FlCity Repair of Sewer Lines Based on the Evaluation Study Project in Planning Stage Health,Flood/Stor m Surge Legislative appropriation, DEP Wastewater Revolving Loan Fund and HMGP Identified Funding Source 7,000,000.00 75 12/6/2012 > 1 year The city is required by the county's settlement order with DEP to undertake a full evaluation of the city's sewer lines to determine where infiltration and exfiltration may be occurring. The study must be undertaken over time so that the system is tested in both the rainy season and the dry season. The City has completed that study and has determined where repairs are necessary. Repair of these lines will reduce the health hazards associated with septic tanks that pollute the groundwater. Now that the city has determined where the sewer lines are allowing exfiltration and infiltration, the city must begin to address the repair or replacement of those lines. Because the city had undertaken a large multi-year sewer line replacement project following Hurricane Andrew, the City found that there are many sections of the city that have minimum issues. There are other parts of the city where the lines are very old and most of any problems that were discovered there. The City applied to the DEP Revolving Loan Fund and has been added to the priority list. The City has applied for the planning and feasibility study loan and that portion of the project should be complete in April, 2017. The City will then apply for a design loan. Municipalities FlCity Scattered Site French Drain Project Future Unfunded Project Flood,Storm Surge CDBG, Legislative appropriation, future HMGP Identified Funding Source 2,500,000.00 70 12/10/2012 > 1 year The City has several low areas that accumulate a moderate amount of standing water following a significant rain event. Water may stand for several days before it slowly percolates into the ground. Constructing drainage structures in these locations will reduce the potential damage to residential and commercial buildings. Municipalities FlCity Sealing the Palm Drive Canal Project in Planning Stage ,Flood Developer Extractions, City Funds, County Funds Funding Secured 7,000,000.00 81 12/1/2012 > 1 year The Palm Drive Canal is the main drainage structure in the city to transmit storm runoff to the Atlantic Ocean. Most of the underground drainage in the city eventually ends up in this canal. The open canal collects trash and debris over time and requires constant cleaning to remain free flowing. It is also a safety hazard because of the two lanes of traffic on each side. In the floods of 2004-05, the canal overflowed due to its inability to handle the volume of storm water because of siltation and trash blocking the culverts. Part of the open canal is in Homestead so the project has an effect on both cities. Funds have been secured to cover the Canal between US1 and SW 172 Avenue. Municipalities FlCity Sewer Hookups, Laterals, and Septic Tank Abandonment Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge,Health CDBG Identified Funding Source 500,000.00 62 12/8/2012 > 1 year Within the City there are a number of houses that are still on septic tanks for various reasons. Some are not adjacent to a sewer line and cannot hook up to the sanitary sewer system. Many families are very low income and cannot afford to pay the construction cost of hooking up to the sanitary sewer system and properly abandoning their septic system. There are a few commercial locations where no sewer service is available and businesses are operating on septic systems. The CRA has funded the cost to hook up low income households in the Community Redevelopment Area and the City has used grant funding to hook up many more. However, the City needs the funding to address the remainder of the needed hookups, gravity lines, lift stations, and septic tank abandonments. In hurricanes as recent as 2005, there was flooding in neighborhoods that covered septic tanks and they no longer operated properly. In some instances, pollution from the septic tanks and field lines escaped from the system and contaminated yards. Correction of this problem will prevent pollution of the groundwater. Municipalities FlCity Storm Water Drainage Palm Dr/NW 2nd St/Redland Road/NW 7th Ave Project in Planning Stage ,Flood Legislative Appropriation, CDBG, HMGP Identified Funding Source 1,200,000.00 64 12/9/2012 > 1 year Palm Drive runs east and west and divides the City in two parts. Near NW 8th Court/NW 9th Avenue and Palm Drive, the property on the northern side of Palm Drive is much lower than the center of Palm Drive. During a significant rain event, the rain creates a small pond on the north side of Palm Drive until the water gets high enough to sheet flow over Palm Drive. There are several houses low enough to flood, and the streets can become impassable. This will also eventually weaken Palm Drive's road base. The City desires to install a series of French drains to capture and percolate the stormwater to lessen the flooding possibilities. During the construction the City will also rebuild the roadways with curb and gutter, landscaping, swales, and sidewalks. Municipalities FlCity Water Works Systems Improvement Project Future Unfunded Project ,Health Legislative appropriation Identified Funding Source 900,000.00 54 12/4/2012 > 1 Year The city and its engineer have identified a number of scattered improvements required to eliminate problems of infiltration and exfiltration, which is clearly important for protection of water quality, to improve circulation of water within the system, to improve fire flow, and to insure compliance with current county code. The work involves replacing/repairing damaged sections of pipe, increasing sections of 2" pipe with 8" pipe, installing four fire hydrants, and related tasks. Municipalities Golden Beach Emergency Generators Other ,Flood/Storm Surge Unknown/None 50,000.00 0 unknown An emergency generator will guarantee continued operation of the storm water system and the Town Hall/Emergency Operation Center and Police Substation in the event of power outages. The town is located in a coastal environment, and is subject to storms and hurricanes. 42 of 93 208 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Golden Beach Roadway/Streetscape Improvement Other Unknown/None 2,987,310.00 0 unknown This project will provide safety for all pedestrian traffic including ADA compliance, pedestrians, bicyclists, and strollers use throughout the town of Golden Beach by reducing vehicular speeds, lane narrowing, radical reduction at corners, delineation and deviation, pavers, and the landscape effect and enhanced lighting. In addition to these aspects of the project, the Town plans to shift the current centerline of the Golden Beach Drive roadway pavement three (3) feet east to achieve a balanced impact on the private properties on either side of the roadway to accommodate new sidewalks, valley gutter curbing, landscaping, and much more. Currently, there are no sidewalks along this main thoroughfare and therefore; pedestrians, bicyclists, joggers, etc. all share the roadway with motorized traffic. This is a situation that is potentially unsafe, unfriendly, and poses serious concerns to the town's administrators, elected officials, and residents. This plan proposes constructing a new 4-foot sidewalk along the entire west side of the street. In addition to the aforementioned aspects of the roadway improvement project, this plan includes implementing traffic calming measures and minor street improvements. Municipalities Golden Beach Storm Water Drainage System Improvements Other ,Flood/Storm Surge Unknown/None 4,635,000.00 0 unknown The proposed project is the completion of the storm water facilities as per our storm water Master Plan. The project will mitigate the flooding and saltwater intrusion problems exhibited in the areas west of State Road A1A. This area includes the following five drainage basins: South Parkway Basin, North Parkway Basin, Massini Basin, Center Island Basin, and North Island Basin. The project will include the construction of catch basin inlets, manholes, storm sewer pipes, drainage wells, and three stormwater pump stations. In addition to the flooding mitigation, the proposed drainage systems will enhance the water quality of storm water discharges from the mainland to the Intracoastal Waterway by diverting the first stage of runoff to drainage wells. Municipalities Golden Beach The Town Hall/Emergency Operation Center Other ,Flood/Storm Surge,Power Failure,Wind Unknown/None 0.00 0 unknown The existing Town Hall, which houses all of the Town's vital records and has been identified as a critical facility, is in need of significant modifications or replacement. The current Town Hall building has limited space, which hinders the ability for employees to adequately respond to the community's needs. A modification option would include the expansion of the current Town Hall building, providing much-needed expanded record storage, additional administration offices for the current staff, and will allow the Town to comply with all ADA requirements. This complex will provide an approved Emergency Operation Center which will enhance the health and life safety issues for residents. It will become a one-stop center for all emergency needs following a declared emergency event. A replacement facility, if constructed, could be built on Town owned land on A1A, providing a Community Center which could include Town Administration offices, enabling the current Town Hall location to be converted to a recreation building or a recreation area and park. Municipalities Golden Beach Underground Placement of Utilities Other ,Wind Unknown/None 6,900,000.00 0 unknown The electrical, telephone, and cable lines that serve both the town of Golden Beach and adjacent communities are currently affixed to aboveground poles. As a coastal community, the town is vulnerable to service disruptions caused by storms and hurricanes. Within the first phase of the storm water construction areas, the utility lines were underground; however there are insufficient funds available to continue this as the storm water phase's progress. Municipalities Hialeah Roadway Reconstruction (W 8-10 Ave from W 31-33 Street)Funding Secured ,Flood CDBG Identified Funding Source 2,190,724.00 0 9/24/2015 July 2017 This is a roadway reconstruction project that will include West 8th Avenue through West 12th Avenue, between West 31st Street and West 33rd Street. The planned project date has been set to begin January 2017 and is expected to be completed by July 2017 Municipalities Hialeah Roadway/Stormwater Improvements (SE 4 ST to HIA DR from 6-8 AVE)75% complete ,Flood City Capital Improvement Funds Identified Funding Source 151,469.00 72 1/13/2015 December 2017 Repaving of exising roads and the installation of drains throughout. Municipalities Hialeah Gardens Central District Drainage Improvements 25% complete ,Flood,Health Capital Improvement 2,500,000.00 68 1/14/2015 2 years Drainage improvements/flood protection, in portions of the residential areas of the City's Central district which accumulate 12" or more of run-off during a 5-yr 1hr storm event. The project is reconstructing and adding drainage structures and exfiltration trenches in the problem areas, and restoring sidewalks and roadway to design elevation and condition. Municipalities Hialeah Gardens Pump Stations Back-Up Genarators Future Unfunded Project ,Health,Power Failure Unknown/None 750,000.00 82 1/14/2015 3 months Purchase and intall back-up generators at City owned and operated sewer pump stations, in order to continue service during extended power outages. Municipalities Homestead Acquisition of airboats and flat boats Future Unfunded Project Flood Capital Improvement Plan Identified Funding Source 154,000.00 0 1/2/2013 Unknown Both, airboats and flat boats are required to access areas of extensive flooding to assist residents during the disaster event and in the recovery phase. These boats will be used by the Homestead Police Department. Flat Boats: Seven (7) Airboats: Six (6) Municipalities Homestead Acquisition of emergency generators: Electric Utilities Future Unfunded Project All Hazards Capital Improvement Plan Identified Funding Source 175,146.00 76 12/22/2012 Unknown 3 Generators - Supplies power to 3 substations. Municipalities Homestead Acquisition of emergency generators: Police Future Unfunded Project All Hazards Secured Bond Issue for new Police Station Building Identified Funding Source 180,000.00 66 12/19/2012 Unknown 18 Generators- These generators would supply power at 18 critical traffic intersections. The cost is for the generators, transfer switches, and security boxes for the generators. Municipalities Homestead Acquisition of emergency generators: Procurement Future Unfunded Project All Hazards Capital Improvement Plan Identified Funding Source 58,382.00 54 12/23/2012 Unknown 1 Generator - Supplies power to the Procurement warehouse. Municipalities Homestead Acquisition of emergency generators: Public Works and Services Future Unfunded Project All Hazards Capital Improvement Plan Identified Funding Source 934,104.00 80 12/20/2012 Unknown 16 Generators - Includes generators to supply power to the (1) solid waste building; (2) sewer pump station mobile generators; and (3) a generator for the entire facility at the WWTP. Municipalities Homestead Acquisition of emergency vehicles and equipment Future Unfunded Project All Hazards Capital Improvement Fund Identified Funding Source 69,977.00 55 1/2/2013 Unknown This project would involve the acquisition of vehicles and support equipment to access and mitigate affected areas throughout the City. Vehicle: General Services (fleet) 1 vehicle Emergency Operations Municipalities Homestead Acquisition of emergency vehicles and equipment Future Unfunded Project All Hazards Capital Improvement Fund Identified Funding Source 349,883.00 57 1/2/2013 Unknown This project would involve the acquisition of vehicles and support equipment to access and mitigate affected areas throughout the City. Vehicle: City Hall (Emergency Operations Center) 5 vehicles. Emergency Operations Municipalities Homestead Acquisition of emergency vehicles and equipment Future Unfunded Project All Hazards Capital Improvement Fund Identified Funding Source 839,724.00 62 1/2/2013 Unknown This project would involve the acquisition of vehicles and support equipment to access and mitigate affected areas throughout the City. Vehicle: Police Department 12 vehicles Emergency Operations Municipalities Homestead Acquisition of emergency vehicles and equipment Future Unfunded Project All Hazards Capital Improvement Fund Identified Funding Source 69,977.00 68 1/2/2013 Unknown This project would involve the acquisition of vehicles and support equipment to access and mitigate affected areas throughout the City. Unifold Decontamination Shelter System 1 Emergency Operations Municipalities Homestead Acquisition of emergency vehicles and equipment Future Unfunded Project All Hazards Capital Improvement Fund Identified Funding Source 69,977.00 48 1/2/2013 Unknown This project would involve the acquisition of vehicles and support equipment to access and mitigate affected areas throughout the City. Vehicle: Parks and Recreation 1 vehicle Emergency Operations Municipalities Homestead Acquisition of emergency vehicles and equipment Future Unfunded Project All Hazards Capital Improvement Fund Identified Funding Source 69,977.00 55 1/2/2013 Unknown This project would involve the acquisition of vehicles and support equipment to access and mitigate affected areas throughout the City. Wastewater Vac Truck: Public Works 1 vehicle Clean Sewer Debris Municipalities Homestead Acquisition of emergency vehicles and equipment Future Unfunded Project All Hazards Capital Improvement Fund Identified Funding Source 69,977.00 54 1/2/2013 Unknown This project would involve the acquisition of vehicles and support equipment to access and mitigate affected areas throughout the City. 4 WD Back Hoe with Clamp Bucket: Public Works 1 vehicle Clear Debris Municipalities Homestead Acquisition of emergency vehicles and equipment Future Unfunded Project All Hazards Capital Improvement Fund Identified Funding Source 139,954.00 47 1/2/2013 Unknown This project would involve the acquisition of vehicles and support equipment to access and mitigate affected areas throughout the City. Front Loader with Clamp Bucket: Public Works 2 Clear Debris Municipalities Homestead Acquisition of emergency vehicles and equipment Future Unfunded Project All Hazards Capital Improvement Fund Identified Funding Source 69,977.00 51 1/2/2013 Unknown This project would involve the acquisition of vehicles and support equipment to access and mitigate affected areas throughout the City. Stormwater Vac Truck: Public Works 1 vehicle Clear Storm Drains 43 of 93 209 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Homestead Acquisition of emergency vehicles and equipment Future Unfunded Project All Hazards Capital Improvement Fund Identified Funding Source 209,931.00 42 1/2/2013 Unknown This project would involve the acquisition of vehicles and support equipment to access and mitigate affected areas throughout the City. 50 Yard Roll-Off Containers: Public Works 3 vehicles Debris Clean-up/Pickup Municipalities Homestead Acquisition of emergency vehicles and equipment Future Unfunded Project All Hazards Capital Improvement Fund Identified Funding Source 69,977.00 51 1/2/2013 Unknown This project would involve the acquisition of vehicles and support equipment to access and mitigate affected areas throughout the City. Stormwater TV Truck: Public Works 1 vehicle Televise Damaged Lines Municipalities Homestead Additional Digester and Blowers Future Unfunded Project All Hazards Capital Improvement Fund Identified Funding Source 750,000.00 49 1/2/2013 Unknown The additional digester system is needed in order to obtain Class �A� standard for the waste sludge. By meeting a Class �A� standard, the sludge can be utilized in agricultural applications; therefore reducing the amount of waste sludge sent to the South Dade Landfill. Municipalities Homestead Build concrete enclosures around City critical facility systems Future Unfunded Project Wind Capital Improvement Plan Identified Funding Source 181,818.00 61 12/27/2012 Unknown This project is a mitigating measure that involves the design and construction of concrete enclosures around certain vital systems (as described below) to prevent any damage that may affect the system(s) proper performance during and after a hurricane or any other destructive event. Enclosures for two (2) fluoride tanks (water treatment plant). Municipalities Homestead Comprehensive review, modification, and enforcement of local laws and regulations software Future Unfunded Project All Hazards Capital Improvement Plan Identified Funding Source 1,150,000.00 68 12/24/2012 Unknown Update the City's Geographic Information System (GIS) and infrastructure to facilitate the analyses and identification of sensitive areas; and Drafting proposals for improvements, including the enactment of legislation as necessary. Municipalities Homestead Construction of a Structure to store Emergency Vehicles and Equipment Future Unfunded Project Flood Capital Improvement Plan Identified Funding Source 1,200,000.00 58 1/2/2013 Unknown This mitigation project would be a joint effort between Florida City and Homestead to provide shelter for emergency vehicles for both cities. This structure is necessary to ensure readily available emergency vehicles before, during, and after a disaster event. Municipalities Homestead Culvert removal at Keys Gate Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Capital Improvement Plan Identified Funding Source 200,000.00 78 12/5/2012 Unknown Culvert removal at Keys Gate: To remove an existing culvert in the middle of a drainage canal to enhance the flow and relieve flooding, during and after a storm event. Municipalities Homestead Economic Incentives & Education Information Package Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Capital Improvement Plan Identified Funding Source 175,000.00 65 1/2/2013 Unknown This mitigation project involves the creation of a package of economic incentives to encourage City property owners to undertake flood protection measures such as elevating structures above the Base Flood Elevation (BFE), flood proofing improvements and the like. This project would involve the research of funding sources and low interests loans to help owners pay to elevate or rebuild structures, and finding means of offsetting the costs of the flood mitigation work. This project also involves public education through advertising and awareness programs about the mitigation measures necessary that must be taken before a disaster event to minimize the threat to life and property. Municipalities Homestead Elevation of Structure Future Unfunded Project ,Flood HMGP, Disaster Funding, Historic Preservation 125,000.00 60 06/21/2018 > 1 Year The original City Clerk's Office sits on the grounds of the City Hall built in 196. It is a rock structure whose floor level is below the level of the surrounding land. In a moderate or sever rain storm, water drains into the structure so it has become unusable for any purpose. If the building can be elevated about 3 feet, it would be higher than the surrounding ground and would no longer flood. Municipalities Homestead Emergency Supplies and Equipment Other All Hazards Capital Improvement Fund Identified Funding Source 200,000.00 64 1/2/2013 Unknown This project involves the acquisition of tools, supplies, and small equipment to handle different emergencies during a disaster event. These tools and equipment will help in the mitigation process for areas of the City that need cleaning, debris pick-up and removal before, during, and after a disaster event. The Police, Public Works and Services, Development Services and Parks and Recreation are the departments involved in this action. Among these tools and equipment are 48 hour emergency supply kits for 150 essential personnel and damage assessment teams such as cameras, first aid kits, weather gear, communications equipment and debris removal power equipment, along with mobile flood relief pumps will be needed. Municipalities Homestead Flood Insurance Research Project Project in Planning Stage Flood HMGP Identified Funding Source 25,000.00 68 1/2/2013 Unknown This project is an on-going part of the work required for the Community Rating System (CRS) and will involve the research of City properties, which do not have flood insurance and the reasons therefore. This effort would result in an action program designed to increase the number of properties covered by the flood insurance. The project will also review the validity of the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) as reflected on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) and explore the possibilities of variable flood insurance rates that distinguish within the same flood zone between properties that are flood prone and vulnerable to flooding hazards and those which are not and/or have taken steps to correct the potential problem. Municipalities Homestead GIS that locates all city utilities 50% complete All Hazards Capital Improvement Plan Identified Funding Source 5,000,000.00 70 12/8/2012 Unknown GIS containing information on location of and capacity of all public utilities: Create GIS that locates all city utilities (water, sewer, drainage, electric) so problems can readily be located in an emergency. Municipalities Homestead Hazard Material Containers Future Unfunded Project All Hazards Capital Improvement Fund Identified Funding Source 900,000.00 73 1/2/2013 Unknown This project is a mitigating measure against any type of disaster event, and involves the design and construction of a concrete enclosure w/ cover roof to confine hazard material used in the Electric Utility and Solid Waste. The container will prevent any liquid spill on the ground and reduce the chemical hazard material exposure to the workers.The concrete enclosure must meet or comply with the DERM building criteria or other State/County hazard requirement. Municipalities Homestead Improve Transportation Infrastructure 25% complete All Hazards Miami-Dade County Roads and State of Florida Roads Identified Funding Source 2,000,000.00 77 1/2/2013 Unknown This project consists of a citywide roadway/sidewalk/bridge evaluation to identify and improve weak points in the infrastructure. These projects are crucial due to main roadways being used by many as evacuation routes before, during, and after emergency events.Bridge Repairs: This project would involve the repairs of existing, City-owned bridges that are in structurally unsafe and/or poor conditions. Municipalities Homestead Improvements to Existing Buildings 75% complete Flood Capital Improvement Plan Identified Funding Source 500,000.00 66 1/2/2013 Unknown This project involves the improvement to critical department buildings that are below the flood level to prevent flooding during and after a storm event. Municipalities Homestead Increase Wastewater Treatment Plant Capacity WWTP Expansion Future Unfunded Project Flood Capital Improvement Fund Identified Funding Source 40,000,000.00 74 1/2/2013 Unknown WWTP Expansion: Design and construction of an additional Wastewater treatment plant to increase and meet expected capacity of the City in the next 7- 10 years. $ 40,000,000 Municipalities Homestead Installation of Automatic Circuit Reclosers in the Electric Distribution System Construction/Project Begun Power Failure Capital Improvement Fund Identified Funding Source 100,000.00 82 1/2/2013 Unknown This project will enhance the Distribution Feeders over current protection with the objective of; to prevent damage to the equipment and circuits, to prevent hazard to the public and utility personnel, and to maintain a high level of service by preventing power interruptions when possible and minimizing their effects when they do occur.The installation of Circuit Reclosers will mitigate the loss of services for the residential, commercial and industrial customers that are heavily dependent on the availability of electric power. This equipment will reduce significantly the frequency and duration of electric outages in the system. Municipalities Homestead Interchange Modification Construction/Project Begun ,Other Funded by Toll and Concessions Revenue, not taxes Funding Secured 15,000,000.00 75 07/10/2017 Summer 2018 Improving traffic flow through modifications to the interchange at Florida's Turnpike and Campbell Drive (Exit 2). Constructing a new northbound entrance ramp from westbound Campbell Drive and northbound SW 152 Ave. Widening the southbound exit ramp to Campbell Drive to two lanes. Widening Campbell Drive to three lanes from SW 15700 Block to NE 30th Terrace. Improvements to signage, pavement markings. signalization, lighting and drainage. Sound walls will also be constructed along residential areas adjacent to the Turnpike. Municipalities Homestead Krome Avenue Historic District Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Capital Improvement Fund Identified Funding Source 5,740,000.00 75 12/7/2012 Unknown Krome Avenue Historic District: This area is prone to flooding during high rain events and it became evident during Hurricane Katrina. This project will minimize destruction of valuable storefronts and businesses along Krome Avenue and its vicinity. Municipalities Homestead Landscaping and right-of-way enhancement Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Capital Improvement Fund Identified Funding Source 500,000.00 67 12/2/2012 Unknown Landscaping and right-of-way enhancement to prevent flooding: To create swales and landscape to reduce runoff and increase percolation by grading the ROW. 44 of 93 210 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Homestead Mitigation project to protect Critical Facility System Future Unfunded Project Wind Capital Improvement Plan Identified Funding Source 90,909.00 63 12/28/2012 Unknown This project is a mitigating measure that involves the design and construction of concrete enclosures around certain vital systems (as described below) to prevent any damage that may affect the system(s) proper performance during and after a hurricane or any other destructive event. One (1) concrete enclosure for water well #4 (water treatment plant). Municipalities Homestead NE Quadrant Water Storage Tank Future Unfunded Project All Hazards Capital Improvement Fund Identified Funding Source 4,000,000.00 78 1/2/2013 Unknown In light of newly developed areas and the rapid increase of population, it is essential to provide adequate water pressure, fire flow, water quality, and capacity to the area. Municipalities Homestead New Sewer Mains: To upgrade sewer main/lines to eliminate raw sewage from leaking into the water table. Funding Secured Flood Capital Improvement Fund Funding Secured 2,000,000.00 75 1/2/2013 Unknown New Sewer Mains: To upgrade sewer main/lines to eliminate raw sewage from leaking into the water table.: To enable the WWTP to efficiently dispose of its effluent in the foreseeable future. Municipalities Homestead Parks & Recreation Security Enhancement Future Unfunded Project Security/Terroris m Capital Improvement Plan Identified Funding Source 220,000.00 39 12/13/2012 Unknown Parks & Recreation: Each gate to be operated remotely and there will be a telephone and camera at each gate to include: Harris Field, William F. Dickinson Center, Phichol Williams Center, JD Redd and Roby George Park, cameras will also be placed to view the entire Perimeter of the building. Municipalities Homestead Protective Measure for Critical Facility Systems Future Unfunded Project Wind Capital Improvement Plan Identified Funding Source 90,909.00 65 12/29/2012 Unknown This project is a mitigating measure that involves the design and construction of concrete enclosures around certain vital systems (as described below) to prevent any damage that may affect the system(s) proper performance during and after a hurricane or any other destructive event. One (1) polymer concrete enclosure to provide continues service of sludge system (wastewater treatment plant). Municipalities Homestead Protective Measure for Critical Facility Systems Future Unfunded Project Wind Capital Improvement Plan Identified Funding Source 272,727.00 79 12/26/2012 Unknown This project is a mitigating measure that involves the design and construction of concrete enclosures around certain vital systems (as described below) to prevent any damage that may affect the system(s) proper performance during and after a hurricane or any other destructive event. Three (3) concrete enclosures with proper ventilation for existing chlorine feed systems (water treatment plant). Municipalities Homestead Protective Measure for Critical Facility Systems Future Unfunded Project Wind Capital Improvement Plan Identified Funding Source 90,909.00 67 12/30/2012 Unknown This project is a mitigating measure that involves the design and construction of concrete enclosures around certain vital systems (as described below) to prevent any damage that may affect the system(s) proper performance during and after a hurricane or any other destructive event. Storage sheds concrete enclosures (field operations). Municipalities Homestead Protective Measure for Critical Facility Systems Future Unfunded Project Wind Capital Improvement Plan Identified Funding Source 181,818.00 68 1/1/2013 Unknown This project is a mitigating measure that involves the design and construction of concrete enclosures around certain vital systems (as described below) to prevent any damage that may affect the system(s) proper performance during and after a hurricane or any other destructive event. Electric � Build enclosures around 2 substation properties. Municipalities Homestead Protective Measure for Critical Facility Systems Future Unfunded Project Wind Capital Improvement Plan Identified Funding Source 90,909.00 57 12/31/2012 Unknown This project is a mitigating measure that involves the design and construction of concrete enclosures around certain vital systems (as described below) to prevent any damage that may affect the system(s) proper performance during and after a hurricane or any other destructive event. One (1) concrete enclosure for fuel tank (fleet). Municipalities Homestead Public Works & Services Future Unfunded Project Security/Terroris m Capital Improvement Plan Identified Funding Source 400,000.00 67 12/10/2012 Unknown Public Works & Services: Vulnerability Assessment/Emergency Plan for the Wastewater Treatment Plant as required by EPA. This is necessary to assess the vulnerability of international threats and natural disasters. Municipalities Homestead Sewer lines in the Northwest Neighborhood and the West Industrial Area 50% complete Flood Capital Improvement Funds Funding Secured 3,300,000.00 76 1/2/2013 Unknown This project would lessen the possibility of flood during times of heavy rain and prevent the saturation of the ground causing the overflow of septic tanks in these areas. By installing additional sewer lines where they do not now exist, the potential contamination from sewage overflow would be eliminated. Municipalities Homestead Sewer Pump Stations Upgrades 25% complete All Hazards Capital Improvement Plan Identified Funding Source 1,500,000.00 76 12/17/2012 Unknown The pump stations will require funding to purchase mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and equipment for pump stations. Municipalities Homestead Sidewalks/ Roadway Improvements 50% complete All Hazards Capital Improvement Plan Identified Funding Source 200,000.00 56 1/2/2013 Fiscal 2017 This project consists of a citywide roadway/sidewalk/bridge evaluation to identify and improve weak points in the infrastructure. These projects are crucial due to main roadways being used by many as evacuation routes before, during, and after emergency events. Sidewalks/Roadway Improvements: To implement a citywide evaluation to target areas in need. Municipalities Homestead Storm Water System Upgrade Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Capital Improvement Fund Identified Funding Source 21,252,000.00 70 12/1/2012 Unknown Construct new and upgrade drainage elements: To increase drainage capability in the City such as the construction and upgrade of culverts, ditches, French drains, catch basins, etc. Municipalities Homestead Strategy for increasing the flood insurance discount for City of Homestead property owners by improving the CRS rating Future Unfunded Project Flood Grant Identified Funding Source 50,000.00 69 1/2/2013 Unknown Step 1 . Organiza Identify other offices/staff to involve in mitigation planning. Draft and adopt the resolution creating the planning committee. Step 2. Involve the public Identify members of the public to serve on the planning committee, stakeholders and committee chair. Draft a questionnaire to residents. Draft newsletter article(s) and news release(s). Step 3. Coordinate. Identify, collect, and review existing studies, plans, and reports that address natural hazards and your community's needs and goals. Distribute the notice that you are preparing the plan. Step 4. Assess the hazard Write a master list of all hazards faced by your community. Check that your FIRM still accurately depicts the base and 500-year floodplains. Map additional areas subject to flooding and drainage problems. Record other available flood data, such as velocities and warning time. Collect available data on the other hazards. Summarize the hazard data with maps, descriptions, and historical experiences for Committee review and to form the basis of the plan's section on the hazards.] Step 5. Assess the problem. Review and summarize the impact of EACH hazard. Prepare an overall summary of the impacts. Step 6. Set goals. Step 7. Review possible activities. Draft appropriate sections of the plan for committee review Step 8. Draft an action plan. Send the draft to the state hazard mitigation office for a courtesy review. Schedule the public meeting Step 9. Adopt the plan Step 10. Implement, evaluate, and revise Step 11. Make Infrastructure Improvements. Purchase software to improve building and all trades plans review. Purchase hardware to improve building and all trades plans review. Municipalities Homestead Tree Trimming in City of Homestead Future Unfunded Project Wind Capital Improvement Plan Identified Funding Source 150,000.00 58 1/2/2013 Unknown This project involves the acquisition of contractual services for tree trimming at City parks, facilities and roadways. The proper pruning and thinning of tree canopies would be extremely beneficial in minimizing potential damage to buildings, electrical components, vehicles, and other property; and result in a pay back in a reduction of post-event casualty pay-outs. Municipalities Homestead Under-grounding 13kv Distribution Future Unfunded Project All Hazards Capital Improvement Fund Identified Funding Source 12,500,000.00 69 1/2/2013 Unknown This project will enhance system reliability by installing/replacing/under grounding of the existing overhead distribution system across the entire service area. The under grounding of the distribution system will dramatically enhance and increase the Utility Department's ability to provide uninterrupted services to our customers before, during, and after a hurricane, terrorist, or any other destructive event. Municipalities Homestead Upgrade OCB's (Oil Circuit Breakers) with VCB's (Vacuum Circuit Breakers)Other Health Capital Improvement Plan Identified Funding Source 150,000.00 56 1/2/2013 Fiscal 2017 This mitigation project involves the replacement of Medium and High Voltage oil circuit breakers in three of the City Electric Substations. The oil breakers are potential hazard environmental equipment that in the event of a failure, they will cause a great environmental damage due the oil spill caused by the circuit breaker tank rupture. The changing to Vacuum Circuit breakers with a clean interruption device other than oil will reduce the City exposure to the cost associate with the Environmental Response Action that must be taken after mineral oil discharge on the grounds from a failure of a Transmission or Distribution oil filled Circuit Breaker 45 of 93 211 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Homestead Upgrade Substation Feeder Protection 25% complete Power Failure Capital Improvement Fund Identified Funding Source 80,000.00 71 1/2/2013 Unknown This project involves upgrading all electro-mechanical Protective Relays within the Substations to state of the art Intelligent Electronic Devices (IED). A Protective Relay is a device that will monitor the power system for abnormal conditions and take appropriate action to reduce system stress, equipment damage and personal injury.The process of upgrading the Protective Relays has already begun at the McMinn and Lucy Substations. These new microprocessor relays have proven themselves in the field under trying conditions. Whenever there is a system disturbance, these relays have given an abundance of data, which is used to analyze the situation. These IEDs are multi protection devices in which one unit can replace at least five relays that are in service. They also perform monitoring functions for power quality. This project would involve: Installation of microprocessor relays, compatible to the ones already in services. Municipalities Homestead Vegetation work and maintenance equipment Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Capital Improvement Plan Identified Funding Source 100,000.00 64 12/6/2012 Unknown Vegetation work and maintenance equipment: To clear aquatic vegetation around canals and ditches before, during, and after a storm event. Municipalities Homestead Wastewater Infiltration/Inflow 50% complete Flood Capital Improvement Fund Identified Funding Source 2,400,000.00 77 1/2/2013 Unknown This project is needed to conduct a study and the purchase of materials and equipment in order to continue implementing corrective measures to prevent storm and ground water intrusion into the sewer system by performing maintenance and inspections and to protect the groundwater from possible contamination as a result of wastewater exfiltration. Municipalities Homestead Water and Wastewater Telemetry/RTUs 50% complete Multiple (specify in comments Column T) Capital Improvement Fund Identified Funding Source 1,000,000.00 79 1/2/2013 Unknown This project consists of the purchase and installation of telemetry equipment. Radio transmittal units (RTUs)/Telemetry in all pump stations send flow/performance data and alarm situations to a central location which will increase reliability and control before, during, and after a storm disaster. These systems will also control elevation of water tanks, well pumps, and identify pressure points throughout the system. Pump station RTUs/telemetry will significantly increase reliability and diminish sewage back up and overflow occurrences which could result in contamination from raw sewage leaking into the water table. Municipalities Homestead Water Main Improvements 25% complete All Hazards Capital Improvement Fund Identified Funding Source 2,000,000.00 62 12/16/2012 Unknown To upgrade water mains/lines to eliminate any unacceptable materials and maintain the integrity of the system. Municipalities Homestead WWTP Inspection and Preventive Maintenance Future Unfunded Project Flood Capital Improvement Fund Identified Funding Source 500,000.00 76 1/2/2013 Unknown WWTP Inspection and Preventive Maintenance: Required structural inspections for defects of the SBR & digester tanks and repairs based on recommendations Municipalities Key Biscayne Additional Training Funding Secured ,Other Fire Department Training Budget Identified Funding Source 2,500.00 82 11/11/2014 24 months The Key Biscayne Fire Department will provide additional emergency management training to all Fire Department personnel to achieve Incident Command System (ICS) 300 and 400 levels. These courses are provided by the Emergency Management Institute (EMI) for free in Maryland. The ICS-300 Course is the Intermediate ICS for Expanding Incidents which provides training and resources for personnel who require advanced knowledge and application of the ICS, expanding on information covered in the ICS-100 and ICS-200 courses. The ICS-400 Advanced ICS course expands on the ICS 100 through ICS 300 courses offering advanced application of ICS. Estimated cost per attendant per week. Municipalities Key Biscayne Allendale Rd, Warren and Hampton Drainage Improvements Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise Unfunded future project 1,760,000.00 66 9/23/2016 TBD This area is approximately 13.01 acres and it is located just west of the Key Biscayne K-8 Center. The area runs long West McIntyre Street starting just west of Ridgewood Road and ending at Satinwood Road. It also includes portions of Hampton Lane, Warren Lane and Allendale Road. The proposed design includes (1) improvements to the stormwater conveyance system along West McIntyre Street, (2) Hampton Lane, (3) Warren Lane, (4) Allendale Road, and (5) Satinwood Road. The design also proposes (6) redevelopment of one gravity drainage well and (7) the installation of ten additional gravity drainage wells. Municipalities Key Biscayne CERT Readiness Funding Applied for ,Flood,Power Failure,Sea Level Rise,Health,Flood/ Storm Surge,Technologic al Disruption,Wild Fire,Wind Grant Grant Applied For 150,000.00 76 11/11/2014 12 months The Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) is a readiness program which provides training in basic emergency response to the local residents and business owners immediately following a disaster prior to receipt of professional assistance. The program educates a community about natural and man-made disaster preparedness. The training consists of basic first aid, maintenance of traffic safety, utilities safety, rescue operations and other. The program requires the Village to have training personnel, outreach to community, registration, administrative assistance, conduct classes, and provide refresher training annually. Municipalities Key Biscayne Coastal Dune Vegetation Other ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Storm Surge,Wind,Other Capital Improvement Fund Identified Funding Source 10,000.00 78 11/12/2014 12 months As a coastal community, the dune system in the Village of Key Biscayne is the first line of defense against storms. A maintenance program is in place to maintain a healthy dune system by ensuring only native vegetation is present. The root system of native vegetation is extensive and strong. It acts as a securing mechanism for the sand and prevents beach erosion. The removal of exotics and replanting project was completed in September, 2014, when 1,800 square yards of exotic species named Scavola Frutescens (Hawaiian seagrapes) were removed. Re-vegetation resulted in the re-planting of 2,500 Sea Oats. The Village will continue to monitor the vegetation on an annual basis to identify any exotic vegetation and plan the replanting with native species. Dune restoration completed July 2017. This is an ongoing project. Municipalities Key Biscayne Community Center Generator Funding Secured ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Power Failure Capital Improvement Fund Identified Funding Source 75,000.00 67 10/19/2017 December 2018 Installation of generator at the Community Center. Municipalities Key Biscayne Comprehensive Review of Local Laws and Regulations Construction/Project Begun Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise Stormwater Utility Fund Identified Funding Source 5,000.00 85 12/31/2008 2018 Those Local Regulations pertaining to the mitigation of hurricane and flooding hazards were evaluated and updated, including analysis of issues, for opportunities and formulation of proposals with respect to the existing provisions related to Base Flood Elevations, Substantial Improvements, Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) and the consideration of a Freeboard Regulation. Municipalities Key Biscayne CRS Outreach Program Other Flood/Storm Surge,Sea Level Rise,Flood,Wind Stormwater Utility Fund Funding Secured 10,000.00 78 12/31/2008 2014 This project involves establishing a community outreach program to comply with Community Rating System (CRS) requirements under Activity 330. Municipalities Key Biscayne Curtiswood Drive Drainage Improvements Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise Unfunded future project 200,000.00 65 9/23/2016 TBD This area is approximately 7.35 acres and is located to the west of the village, just east of Harbor Drive. It runs along Curtiswood starting at West Enid Drive and ending just north of Westwood Drive.The proposed design includes (1) improvements to the stormwater conveyance system along Curtiswood Drive, (2) redevelopment of two gravity drainage wells and (3) the installation of one additional gravity drainage well. Municipalities Key Biscayne Drainage Improvements on East Heather Drive Project in Planning Stage Flood Stormwater Capital Expenditures Identified Funding Source 150,000.00 70 6/30/2011 2014 This project is the recommended alternative resulting from the Stormwater Master Plan Update 2010. The problem area studied in detail involved the flooding in the vicinity of the East Heather Drive between Crandon Blvd and Ocean Drive. Conveyance testing on existing drainage wells in the Village has shown to be very effective. Upgrades to existing pump station and installation of back flow prevention device. 46 of 93 212 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Key Biscayne Drainage Improvements on Fernwood Road & Hampton Road Future Unfunded Project Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise Potential Stormwater Utility Fund Capital Expenditures Identified Funding Source 80,000.00 76 6/30/2011 2015 This project proposes the installation of a drainage well near the corner of Hampton Lane and Fernwood Road. This would allow the flood waters that would otherwise back-up along the Hampton Road repetitive loss properties a new path to exit the drainage system. Municipalities Key Biscayne Emergency Operation Center Future Unfunded Project ,Power Failure,Technologi cal Disruption,Securit y Breach,Wind,Floo d/Storm Surge,Sea Level Rise Unfunded project Identified Funding Source 35,000.00 74 11/11/2014 30 months This location already acts as the center of emergency operations since it houses the life-saving rescue equipment, vehicles, personnel, communications systems, etc. to respond to emergency events. However, the current facility does not have a “hardened room” or “safe room” from where to operate in case of a major hurricane, tornado, or other life-threatening hazard. A modification to the existing structure requiring hardening and structural retrofits to meet the minimum regulatory requirements to withstand major hurricanes of Category 4 or 5 would be necessary. The project would involve identification of location and creation of a no-window safe room with concrete block walls and all related electrical wiring for emergency communication equipment to maintain operating status Municipalities Key Biscayne Feasibility for Additional open Space Preservation Other Other Capital Improvement Fund- Land Acquisition Identified Funding Source 3,500,000.00 64 12/31/2008 Ongoing Land has been identified for potential open space by Land Acquisition Committee. Committee is continually searching for available open space. Municipalities Key Biscayne Flap Gates at Outfalls (Backflow Prevention) Construction/Project Begun Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise Stormwater Utility Capital Expenditures Funding Secured 750,000.00 87 6/30/2011 December 2017 This project is one of the alternatives resulting from the Stormwater Master Plan Update 2010 and identified as a tier #1 project in the 2015 update. A total of 18 flap gates at the outfalls are proposed to reduce the impact of high tide conditions for those periodic events that coincide with an inland storm event. The gates could help prevent the inflow of seawater in the conveyance system, thereby allowing stormwater runoff on the island to enter the stormsewer system instead of ponding on private property and public right of ways. Municipalities Key Biscayne Harbor Drive Drainage Improvements Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise Unfunded future project 760,000.00 63 9/23/2016 TBD This area is approximately 13.18 acres. It is located west of the village along Harbor Drive starting at West McIntyre Street and ending just north of Westwood Drive. It also includes Harbor Lane and Sunset Circle.The proposed design includes (1) improvements to the stormwater conveyance system along Harbor Drive (2) redevelopment of three gravity drainage wells and (3) the installation of four additional gravity drainage wells. Municipalities Key Biscayne Hardening of Village Hall Generator Future Unfunded Project Wind,Sea Level Rise Unfunded project 200,000.00 73 12/31/2008 2020 This project involves enhancing hazard protection by installing storm proof shutters and doors to protect the existing generator structure adjacent to the Village Hall. This generator is currently exposed and can be damaged or destroyed during a severe storm event. The generator is essential to providing emergency power to the Village Police Department. Municipalities Key Biscayne Hazard Mitigation involvement Other Other,Flood,Flood /Storm Surge,Health,Sea Level Rise,Wind General Fund Funding Secured 10,000.00 84 12/31/2008 ongoing The programs includes continued participatioin at Miami-Dade County LMS meetings, Floodplain Roundtable Discussions, Hurricane Conferences, FDEP and FEMA training seminars and others. Municipalities Key Biscayne Holiday Colony Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise Unfunded future project 1,700,000.00 59 9/23/2016 TBD This area is approximately 24.41 acres and is located east of the village, to the right of Crandon Boulevard. It is composed entirely of the Holiday Colony area. The design proposed includes (1) stormwater drainage improvements to the conveyance system along East Heather Drive (2) the redevelopment of two gravity drainage wells and (3) the retrofit of the existing stormwater pump. Municipalities Key Biscayne Holiday Colony Low Lying Area #1 Project in Planning Stage ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Storm Surge Stormwater Utility Fund Capital Improvements Identified Funding Source 200,000.00 62 11/12/2014 2018 Tier 2 project from Stormwater Master Plan. Televising of existing drainage pipes and replacing CMP with lining. Municipalities Key Biscayne K-8 School Central Basin Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise Unfunded future project 2,300,000.00 70 9/23/2016 TBD The total area is 28.94 acres. This area is centered around the Key Biscayne K-8 Center. This area runs along Ridgewood Drive, Woodcrest Drive and Glenridge Drive starting north of Westwood Drive and ending south of West Heather Drive. It also includes portion of Fernwood Drive. The design proposed includes (1) stormwater drainage improvements to the conveyance system along Ridgewood Road, (2)Woodcrest Road, (3) Glenridge Road, (4)Fernwood Road, (5) West McIntyre Street and (6) West Enid Drive. The design also proposes (6) the redevelopment of two drainage wells and (7) the addition of six gravity drainage wells. Municipalities Key Biscayne K-8 School South Basin Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise Unfunded future project 2,389,000.00 61 9/23/2016 TBD The total area is 26.04 acres and it is located south the Key Biscayne K-8 Center. This area runs along Ridgewood Drive, Woodcrest Drive and Glenridge Drive starting at West Masha Drive and ending south of West Enid Drive. The design proposes includes (1) stormwater drainage improvements to the conveyance system along Ridgewood Road, (2)Woodcrest Road, (3) Glenridge Road, (4)Fernwood Road, (5) West Mashta Drive and (6) West Enid Drive. The design also proposes (6) the redevelopment of two drainage wells and (7) the addition of five gravity drainage wells. Municipalities Key Biscayne New Stormwater Outfall Construction Funding Secured Multiple Private funding.Identified Funding Source 210,000.00 81 6/30/2011 TBD This project proposes construction of 1,800 LF of 18-inch RCP stormwater outfall with associated relining of piping leading to outfall as part of the drainage improvement plan to mitigate the repetitive flood claims at 24 Crandon Boulevard. Municipalities Key Biscayne Ocean Lane Drive Drainage improvements Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise Unfunded future Project 1,400,000.00 74 9/23/2016 TBD This area approximately 14.32 acres and is located to the north of the village and to left of Crandon Boulevard. It is composed of entirely of Ocean Lane Drive, from its start at the intersection of Crandon Boulevard and Ocean Lane Drive all the way to the entrance to the Island House Apartments. The proposed design includes (1) improvements to the stormwater conveyance system along Ocean Lane (2) redevelopment of the existing injection wells and (3) the retrofit of an existing pump station. Municipalities Key Biscayne Palmwood Drive Drainage Improvements Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise Unfunded future project 305,000.00 66 9/23/2016 TBD This area is approximately 8.85 acres and it is located west of the village. It is bounded to the north by Redwood Lane, to the south and west by Palmwood Lane and to the east by Allendale Road. The proposed design includes (1) improvements to the stormwater conveyance system along Palmwood Lane, (2) Redwood Lane and (3) Allendale Road. The design also proposes (4) redevelopment of one gravity drainage well. Municipalities Key Biscayne Phase II Village K-8 Center Stormwater Pump Station 75% complete ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge Stormwater Utility Fund Identified Funding Source 350,000.00 81 11/12/2014 September 2018 The area around the Key Biscayne K-8 learning center has endured chronic flooding throughout the years. Due to budget constraints two (2) gravity wells are being designed and installed to alleviate some of the flooding at the southwest corner of the school and the other at the northeast area. A new pump station at the northeast corner of the school is the preferred option within an existing utility easement. The well at the northeast end will be installed such that it can be converted to an injection well in the future and connected to the future pump station. Municipalities Key Biscayne Reverse 911 Community Notification System Funding Secured ,Technological Disruption Capital Improvement Fund Identified Funding Source 105,000.00 75 11/11/2014 TBD During emergency conditions such as hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, the Village relies on several media for public warning dissemination. The Village will purchase and install the Reverse 911 Community Notification System to supplement the current procedures available to Village emergency operators. This system will augment the speed of message delivery through use of the existing phone system and maximize the number of message recipients during an emergency event to ensure the Villages 12,000+/- citizens receive the life-saving instructions. Estimate cost includes dispatcher's salaries. 47 of 93 213 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Key Biscayne Sabal Drive Drainage Improvements Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise Unfunded future project 60,000.00 69 9/23/2016 TBD This area is approximately 3.46 acres and it is located west of the village, just east of Harbor Drive. It runs along Sabal Drive starting at West McIntyre Street and ending at Beechwood Drive.The proposed design includes (1) the addition of one gravity drainage well. Municipalities Key Biscayne The Gardens District Drainage Improvements Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise Unfunded Future project 2,930,000.00 66 9/23/2016 TBD Boulevard. It is composed entirely of the area knows at the Gardens District. The design proposed includes (1) stormwater drainage improvements to the conveyance system along East Enid Drive, (2) Sunrise Drive, (3) Galen Drive and (4) Ocean Lane. The design also proposes (5) the redevelopment of four drainage wells, (8) the addition on stormwater pump station with (9) three injection wells. Municipalities Key Biscayne Village Green Park neighborhood Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise Unfunded future project 1,800,000.00 61 9/23/2016 TBD The total area is 29.94 acres and it is located just west of the Village Green Park. It runs along Ridgewood Road, Woodcrest Road, Glenridge Road and Fernwood Road starting north of West McIntyre Street end ending south of Hampton Lane and Woodcrest Lane. The design proposed includes (1) stormwater drainage improvements to the conveyance system along Ridgewood Road, (2)Woodcrest Road, (3) Glenridge Road, (4)Fernwood Road and (5) West Heather Drive. The design also proposes (6) the redevelopment of one drainage well and (7) the addition of six gravity drainage wells. Municipalities Key Biscayne West Enid Corridor Drainage Improvements Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise Unfunded future project 1,600,000.00 61 9/23/2016 TBD This area is approximately 8.31 acres and it is located just west of the Key Biscayne K-8 Center. The area runs long West Enid Drive starting just west of Ridgewood Road and ending at Satinwood Road. It also includes portions of Hampton Lane, Warren Lane and Allendale Road. The proposed design includes (1) improvements to the stormwater conveyance system along West Enid Drive, (2) Hampton Lane, (3) Warren Lane, (4) Allendale Road, and (5) Satinwood Road. The design also proposes (6) redevelopment of one gravity drainage well and (7) the installation of seven additional gravity drainage wells. Municipalities Key Biscayne West Heather Drive Corridor Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise Unfunded future project 2,245,000.00 64 9/23/2016 TBD The total area is 20.27 and is located to the west of the village. It runs along West Heather Drive and includes portions of Allendale Road, Warren Lane and Hampton Lane. The design proposes includes (1) stormwater drainage improvements to the conveyance system along West Heather Drive, (2)Allendale Road, (3)Warren Lane and (4)Hampton Lane. The design also proposes (5) the redevelopment of one drainage wells and (6) the addition of seven gravity drainage wells. 4 Village Green Park. Municipalities Key Biscayne Westwood Drive Drainage Improvements Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise Unfunded future project 1,820,000.00 63 9/23/2016 TBD This area is approximately 13.18 acres. It is located to the south west of the village Westwood Drive starting at just west of Ridgewood Road and ending at Harbor Drive. It also includes portions of Hampton Lane, Warren Lane, Allendale Road, Curtiswood Drive and Myrtlewood Lane. The proposed design includes (1) improvements to the stormwater conveyance system along Westwood Drive, (2) Hampton Lane, (3) Warren Lane, (4) Allendale Road, and (5) Harbor Drive. The design also proposes (6) redevelopment of two gravity drainage wells and (7) the installation of eleven additional gravity drainage wells. Municipalities Medley Drainage Improvements Phase I 50% complete ,Flood,Health Town Grant Applied For 150,000.00 97 7/8/2014 Unknown 1. Intersection of N.W. South River Drive and N.W. 109th Street - new drainage installation and concrete paving for flood prone area. These improvements will include design and construction. Estimated construction cost of $190,000.00. Municipalities Medley Drainage Improvements Phase II 50% complete ,Flood,Health,Pow er Failure Town Identified Funding Source 450,000.00 96 7/8/2014 Unknown N.W. 102nd Street (from N.W. 95th Avenue to FEC Railway right-of-way, and N. W. 104th Street from N.W. 95th Avenue to FEC Railway right-of-way). Drainage installation and paving of flood prone area. Estimated construction cost of $450,000.00. Municipalities Medley Drainage Improvements Phase III 25% complete ,Flood,Health Town Identified Funding Source 270,000.00 100 7/8/2014 3 years N.W. 91st Court (from N.W. 100th Street to N.W. 101st Street). Drainage installation and paving of low-to-moderate income community that is prone to flooding during rain events. This project is needed to improve the improper and undersized system. Estimated construction cost of $270,000.00. Municipalities Medley Drainage Improvements Phase IV Project in Planning Stage ,Flood,Health,Pow er Failure Town Identified Funding Source 900,000.00 100 7/8/2014 Unknown N.W. 96th Street (from its intersection with N.W. 89th Avenue to its terminus, and N.W. 97th Street from its intersection with N. W. 89th Avenue to its terminus). Drainage installation and paving for low-income community with severe flooding due to rain events. Estimated construction cost of $900,000.00. Municipalities Medley Flood Mitigation Area South Construction/Project Begun ,Flood,Wind State, County & Town Grant Applied For 2,300,000.00 88 11/20/2014 2017 Design and Construction of interconnected drainage system, cross drains to provide much needed protection from flooding events during periods of light to normal rain. Municipalities Medley FLOOD MITIGATION OVERFLOW STRUCTURE NO. 3 Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge,Sea Level Rise,Flood Stormwater fund Identified Funding Source 1,700,000.00 84 01/24/2018 2019 Stormwater pump station, the expansion of an existing retention pond and an overflow structure to be located at the corner of NW 89th Ave and NW 90th St. Municipalities Medley Lakeside Retirement Community Building Project in Planning Stage ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Pow er Failure,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Other General Fund Identified Funding Source 230,000.00 88 01/24/2018 2021 Structural analysis of existing building to meet FEMA requirements for a “Community Safe Room”. Municipalities Medley Medley Public Services Facilities Strengthening 50% complete ,Wind,Flood Town of Medley Identified Funding Source 800,000.00 84 11/20/2014 Unknown Strengthening of Public Services Building Municipalities Medley NW South River Drive Drainage Improvements Project in Planning Stage ,Flood,Wind Town of Medley Budget and Grant Funding Secured 2,000,000.00 98 11/20/2014 Unknown Drainage improvements for this flood prone area - From NW 116th Way to NW 121 Way (2,600 LF) 48 of 93 214 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Medley Paving & Drainage Improvements Project in Planning Stage ,Flood,Health,Pow er Failure Capital Improvement Projects - Town Budget Grant Applied For 1,810,000.00 96 7/8/2014 1 year 1. Intersection of N.W. South River Drive and N.W. 109th Street - new drainage installation and concrete paving. Estimated construction cost of $190,000.00. 2. N.W. 102nd Street (from N.W. 95th Avenue to FEC Railway right-of-way, and N. W. 104th Street from N.W. 95th Avenue to FEC Railway right-of-way). Drainage installation and paving. Estimated construction cost of $450,000.00. 3. N.W. 91st Court (from N.W. 100th Street to N.W. 101st Street). Drainage installation and paving. Estimated construction cost of $270,000.00. 4. N.W. 96th Street (from its intersection with N.W. 89th Avenue to its terminus, and N.W. 97th street from its intersection with N. W. 89th Avenue to its terminus). Drainage installation and paving. Estimated construction cost of $900,000.00. Municipalities Medley Russian Colony Canal Bank Stabilization Other ,Flood Town Grant Applied For 2,000,000.00 92 11/20/2014 Unknown Canal Bank Stabilization along North side of NW 106 Street Municipalities Medley Tobie Wilson Park Flood Proofing & Strengthening 75% complete ,Flood Town Funded Identified Funding Source 800,000.00 90 11/20/2014 2 years Flood Proofing and strengthening of facility and fields Municipalities Medley Town Hall Building Strengthening Construction/Project Begun ,Flood Town of Medley Funding Secured 800,000.00 96 11/20/2014 1 year Installation of Impact Windows, and strengthening of Second Floor Backyard and Community Safe Room at Town Hall/Municipal Services Facility Municipalities Medley Wastewater Pump Station improvement Program Project in Planning Stage ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Power Failure,Other Stormwater fund Identified Funding Source 1,000,000.00 80 01/24/2018 2020 Currently the Town of Medley owns and operates two sewage pump stations (SPS) that shall be upgraded in accordance to MD- RER/DERM requirements to prevent or minimize bypassing of raw, diluted or partially treated sewage in future storm events. As required by MD County, all SPS shall be protected from physical damage by the 100-year storm and shall be operational and accessible at all times and shall not be inundated. Municipalities Miami * Alice Wainwright Park Shoreline/Bridge hardening and storm water management Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 6,849,415.00 70 11/30/2017 8 months Implementation of sea level rise solution to assist in mitigation of flooding impact in immediate neighborhood.Utilization of hardening solutions to improve flood control. Baywalk along waterfront (in compliance with Miami 21) made of materials that can withstand exposure to storm water. Municipalities Miami * Breakwater/jetty for Miamarina Bayside Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 3,000,000.00 70 11/30/2017 6 months This project is a feasibility study on the impact of a breakwater in or around the Miamarina, protecting its users from storm/wind damage similar to that experienced during Hurricane Irma. After Hurricane Irma, damages at Miamarina were found to be nominal in comparison to those experienced at Dinner Key Marina. However, hurricane related storm surge did effect the eastern-most portions of the marina, causing damages to pilings and electrical pedestals/transformers. Most damages sustained appeared to be related to the thrashing of vessels against the marina’s structures. This is project is an efficacy study of breakwater systems that will protect the Miamarina from powerful storm surge, and further reduce the marina’s exposure to turbulent waters. The study would focus on breakwater structures which can be deployed in a safe and environmental friendly manner. The work would involve an engineering/environmental review and proposal. Eventual construction would be aimed at increasing the life-span of one of the Cities largest marina facilities, beyond 20-39 years. The study seeks to address 3 hazards (life-safety, environment, and property/structure damage). Based on the damaged assessed from the most recent incident, such damages may pose a life-safety & environmental risk. In particular: submerged debris and vessels, heavy (fresh) water leaks, displaced fireboxes, broken transformers/electrical equipment and loose pilings. Given the described, such a project would likely take 6 months to 1 year to complete as it involves a site assessment and feasibility study. The completion of this project would allow the City to pursue the realization (construction) of the proposed. This would positively impact the welfare and resiliency of the local community, surrounding waterways, and impact well over 10,000 people in a given year. Successful completion of a breakwater system near Miamarina involves protecting public assets worth over $50 million dollars as well as several million in private property. Municipalities Miami * Brickell Bay Drive Protective Linear Park and Sea Wall Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 7,500,000.00 86 11/29/2017 1 year Brickell Bay Drive is an approximately 450 meter roadway in downtown Miami. Eight high-rise condo buildings either on the road or immediately adjacent to it and eight more directly behind it. During hurricane Irma, Brickell Bay Drive experienced a 1 meter storm surge, flooding the lobbies of many of those buildings. This was the primary point of entry of storm surge into the Brickell area, which is heavily populated and is also a commercial hub for the City of Miami. The 2-lane roadway of Brickell Bay Drive has a very low seawall that needs to be upgraded and improved. It is one of the few areas in Miami where the public right of way is parallel to the water’s edge. There is currently no public access to Biscayne Bay from the right of way. This project proposes a new seawall for the right of way combined with a protective linear park that will help to attenuate wave action, storm surge, and king tides. This park will also serve a recreational purpose and will provide water access to the public. Salt-tolerant plants will serve as an urban habitat and will also help to stabilize the shoreline in the face of rising sea levels. Municipalities Miami * City of Miami Mitigation Plan Business Case Analysis Future Unfunded Project ,Health,Power Failure,Security Breach,Storm Surge,Technologic al Disruption,Wild Fire,Wind,Other Applying for PDM funding Grant Applied For 500,000.00 74 10/05/2017 6 months This business case study will include an economic analysis of the value of our risk reduction plans in our LMS and will address multiple hazards, with a focus on flooding and sea level rise. This analysis will explain the risk cost of inaction (in dollar terms) and the extent to which the risk cost is likely to be reduced as a result of the city’s infrastructure investments (also in dollar terms). The work will consider the complex relationship and impacts among the City's planned investments to the City’s property tax base, flood insurance, real estate market and financial mortgage cycles, and City credit ratings, land use issues, or any other factor that may be pertinent. Municipalities Miami * Citywide Flood/Drainage Mitigation of over 100 Known Flooding Locations Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 6,000,000.00 86 11/29/2017 6 months This project is for neighborhood drainage projects throughout the City of Miami. The current list includes 148 projects for an estimated cost of $6 million. The average project cost is approximately $40k. Individual projects range from $20k to $200k. 49 of 93 215 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Miami * Curtis Park Riverwalk Hardening Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 2,605,000.00 51 11/30/2017 4 months Install a precast/concrete walkway that can withstand potential storm water impact and reduced chances of repairs post storm to the walkways along the waterfront. Municipalities Miami * David Herring Center Backup Generator Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Pow er Failure,Sea Level Rise,Security Breach,Storm Surge,Technologic al Disruption,Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 300,000.00 90 11/30/2017 6 months David Herring: The City of Miami is seeking to provide backup power for electrical systems in the building which provide for computers, servers, HVAC, lighting, etc. This building houses personnel from the Office of Emergency Management & Homeland Security as well as disaster readiness equipment (a majority of which are UASI purchased). The location is also designed to serve as a backup Emergency Operations Center and is critical to continuity of operations. Municipalities Miami * Emergency Management Area Comprehensive Security Camera System for City Marinas and Boat Ramp Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Pow er Failure,Sea Level Rise,Security Breach,Storm Surge,Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 1,000,000.00 74 11/30/2017 6 months This project involves the installation of military/commercial grade CCTV systems at City Marinas and Boat Ramps (specifically, Dinner Key Marina, Miamarina, Marine Stadium Marina, Seminole Boat Ramp, Watson Island Boat Ramp). These cameras will provide City management, emergency/law enforcement services with real-time surveillance of these waterfront properties. Cameras will help document damages from storms and other disasters, as well as assist in preventing and investigating potential acts of terrorism, sabotage, drug and human trafficking. The Cities access to high-quality photos/video produced by this equipment will assist in alleviating repetitive loss. Currently, City of Miami marinas and boat launch areas are not adequately equipped to capture images/video related to the aforementioned vulnerabilities; this requires the City to commit limited public-safety/security resources in its place. The quality/features of the type of system being considered suggests that such mitigation is expected to last through and address hazards for over 10 years, but possibly less than 20. There seems to be no apparent effect on the environment from the installation of such equipment, other than that it will improve the City’s ability to report/prevent environmental hazards in or near our waterways. Modern marine CCTV systems, particularly those which are of commercial/military grade are capable of capturing/recording high definition images over long distances/and in a multitude of environmental conditions (night, rain, wind, etc.). Given these advantages, having high-grade cameras at the proposed locations may benefit areas/jurisdictions outside the City of Miami’s control: state/federal submerged lands, ports, and other municipalities. The primary responsibility of operating and accessing these cameras will be controlled by the City of Miami Police Department; which would be the direct liaison to federal/state law enforcement bodies. Given the vulnerabilities involved, such equipment will have the potential of protecting/saving well over 1,000 lives. At this current point in time, the City of Miami has allocated some resources for the installation of these cameras at 1-2 locations. It has been determined that such equipment will require specialized expertise and would likely take 6 months to 1 ½ years to complete. Municipalities Miami * Fire-Rescue Training Center/Backup 911 Center Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Pow er Failure,Sea Level Rise,Security Breach,Storm Surge,Technologic al Disruption,Wild Fire,Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 18,000,000.00 91 11/29/2017 1 year Miami is a major port city on the Atlantic coast of south Florida in the southeastern United States. As the seat of Miami-Dade County, the municipality is the principal, central, and the most populous city of the Miami metropolitan area and part of the second-most populous metropolis in the southeastern United States. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, Miami's metro area is the eighth-most populous and fourth-largest urban area in the U.S., with a population of around 5.5 million. The City of Miami is home to a very diverse population with over 450,000 residents in a 38.5 square mile radius making the City extremely dense with regards to its population and population density. The City of Miami Department of Fire Rescue is a full service Fire Department providing Fire protection, Emergency Medical Services, Hazardous Materials response, Marine Operations, as well as hosting one of the 28 national Urban Search and Rescue Teams. The Department of Fire Rescue is a Class 1 ISO rated organization that serves the City of Miami Residents and visitors, responding to over 103,000 runs in 2016. The continued growth of the City, provides unique challenges on the Department to be able to keep up with the very increasing demands for services. In order to keep pace with this increased level of services, it is imperative for the Fire Departments leadership to be vigilant in maintaining an adequate workforce, trained to the highest levels. The City owns and operates its own Fire Rescue Training center located in the City’s southern neighborhood known as Coconut Grove tasked with training future fire fighters in all of the aspects of today’s fire service. This facility is crucial to the City of Miami not only for the training it provides to the fire department, but it also serves multiple uses for the essential operations of emergency services. Those additional uses include serving as a back to the City’s PSAP (Public Safety Answering Points), to house City employees and families during disasters (as in Hurricane Irma), to conduct community outreach and disaster education, as a staging area during disasters including the need for K-9 facilities to house USA&R search and rescue dogs, and as a point of distribution (POD) when needing to conduct health evaluations and vaccinations as in the numerous pandemics experienced by this community. Finally, the City’s EOC is also backed-up at this facility. Over the years, this facility has experienced repetitive losses during natural events. The roof is beyond repair and needs to be completely replaced and the damage caused by the recent winds and water from Irma makes the restoration of this facility questionable. The replacement of this critical facility would serve the Fire Department and the City much better due to the age and conditions of the facility. Previous contamination to the grounds could require mitigation actions that would be fiscally restrictive to any restoration project. We are asking for $25,000,000.00 to be able to replace this aging facility with an adequate replacement. Municipalities Miami * Generators for Parks Facilities Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Pow er Failure,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 1,750,000.00 77 11/30/2017 3 months This project is is to purchase generators for parks facilities to allow them to open immediately after a disaster in order to provide public support services such as food distribution, child care, donation collection etc. 50 of 93 216 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Miami * Grapeland Heights Police Substation Flood Proofing and Generator Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 900,000.00 81 11/30/2017 6 months The Grapeland Heights Police Substation Building is currently being used to store criminal case files, records, property, and evidence for the City of Miami. These items must be maintained in a secure area to prevent improper access while allowing use by police for on-going investigations. The proposed mitigation project would prevent water from entering the first floor and provide a water removal system to protect the building from flooding. The project would include installation of floodgates that would be put into place during high-risk periods for flooding. This would not only protect vital police records, but would ensure the continuous operation of this critical facility both during the disaster and during the response and recovery phase of the disaster. Grapeland Heights: The City of Miami is seeking to provide backup power for electrical systems in the buildings which provide for computers, servers, HVAC, lighting, etc. This building houses specialized units such as K-9, Motors, Traffic and Accident Investigations and is critical to continued operations pre and post disaster. Municipalities Miami * Home elevations in flood-prone areas Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 1,000,000.00 56 01/09/2018 1 year This project will be to provide funding to vertically elevate the homes of Miami residents. We will model FEMA Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) for fund distribution. All resident's the receive funding must have flood insurance. Funds will be distributed on a first-come, first-served basis after accounting for the following: Severe Repetitive Loss (SRL), Repetitive Loss (RL), and any other homes with flood insurance. The first tier of funding will be SRL homes, the second RL, and all other homes will be a part of the third tier. Funded homes with SRL will receive $200,000, funded homes with RL will receive $180,000 with a $20,000 cost- share, and all other funded homes will receive $150,000 with a $50,000 cost share until the grant award is fully encumbered. The cost-share must be paid for by the resident. Funds will be distributed on a reimbursement-basis provided the residents fully comply with all program rules. SRL and RL will be defined as per FEMA's definitions on the 2017 FMA fact sheet. Residents will have to prove that their homes meet the definitions. This program will fund 5-6 homes. Municipalities Miami * Hurricane-proofing for City-Owned Parks Future Unfunded Project ,Wind,Security Breach HMGP Identified Funding Source 12,000,000.00 71 11/30/2017 4 months This project seeks to replace all non-hardened windows and doors in City park facilities with impact-resistant versios. Municipalities Miami * Jose Marti and East Little Havana Storm Water Management Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 1,264,875.00 73 11/30/2017 8 months Seawall rebuilding to allow an increased height in compliance for city code and reduce storm surge flooding. Retention and drainage design to allow park to accommodate increased volume of storm related water and allow flood control and mitigate potential damage impact to surrounding neighborhood. Municipalities Miami * Kennedy Park/Peacock Park/Myers Park regional storm water management Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 16,355,000.00 70 11/30/2017 8 months Replacement of current boardwalk with pre-cast/concrete walkways that can withstand storm water and reduce impact from a disaster and maintain public use. Seawall replacement with hardened materials and raised to recommended height for prevention of flooding. Municipalities Miami * Kenneth Meyers Park storm water management Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 17,304,000.00 67 11/30/2017 8 months Seawall replacement with hardened materials and raised to recommended height for prevention of flooding. Baywalk along waterfront (in compliance with Miami 21) made of materials that can withstand exposure to storm water. Investment in seawall and walkway can prevent future repair costs and impact from flooding on surrounding neighborhood. Municipalities Miami * Legion Park storm water management Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 3,674,935.00 67 11/30/2017 8 months Shoreline enhancements with natural and or hardened materials. Grading and active or passive drainage systems to reduce sunny-day flooding and the impacts of sea-level rise. This project will prevent future damange to a citywide recreation area and a historically designated park. Municipalities Miami * Margaret Pace Park storm water management Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 9,586,050.00 67 11/30/2017 8 months Shoreline enhancements with natural and or hardened materials. Grading and active or passive drainage systems to reduce sunny-day flooding and the impacts of sea-level rise. Prevent future repair costs and impact from flooding on surrounding neighborhood. Municipalities Miami * Marine Stadium Park stormwater management Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 9,420,000.00 60 11/30/2017 1+ year(s) Evaluation of shoreline and implementation of flood control/sea level rise solutions to reduce impact to surrounding area. Bay walk along waterfront (in compliance with Miami 21) made of materials that can withstand exposure to storm water. Investment in seawall and walkway can prevent future repair costs and impact from flooding on surrounding neighborhood. Municipalities Miami * Morningside Pool and Park buildings hardening and resilient upgrades Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Wind,Securi ty Breach HMGP Identified Funding Source 10,000,000.00 36 11/30/2017 1 year New pool facility that can accommodate proximity to waterfront with design that can withstand impact of sea level rise, storm surge, flooding and normal wear and tear from proximity to salt water to ultimately reduce downtime of facility from damage. Improvements to current recreation center to allow less impact to building as a result of flooding, high winds and disaster conditions. Municipalities Miami * Morningside Regional Storm water Management Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 9,742,115.00 74 11/30/2017 8 months Seawall rebuilding to allow an increased height in compliance for city code and reduce storm surge flooding. Retention and drainage design to allow park to accommodate increased volume of storm related water and allow flood control and mitigate potential damage impact to surrounding neighborhood. 51 of 93 217 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Miami * Portable Electrical Backup Units for City Marinas (temp. pedestals, hook ups) Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Power Failure,Sea Level Rise,Security Breach,Storm Surge,Technologic al Disruption,Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 1,800,000.00 60 11/30/2017 6 months Given damages sustained during Hurricane Irma and to address the immediate needs of marina customers (safety, power, water) in such incident. This project sees to provide City Marinas for a permanent (owned) alterative to renting temporary electrical marine equipment for docks and piers. A unique aspect of such equipment is its utility, as it flexible in a series of disaster scenarios. Technically, such equipment would be deployed and controlled by City emergency services as a precaution to hazards which would require cutting power to marina facilities. Further, availing such equipment would reduce the City’s liability as to private/public property damage and life-safety in the event that cutting the marina’s power is required option. Cutting power at City of Miami marina facilities (where there are docked/connected vessels) would implicate risk to private property worth well over $100 million (combined). This equipment is an effective mitigation measure in preventing electrical fires, electrocution, and the sinking of docked vessels. During Hurricane Irma, City staff and boaters reported various incidents of the aforementioned, that which can be much more severe in the event of a major catastrophic storm. Hence, this upgrade addresses the protection for at 3 hazards (life-safety, environmental, and damage to property/structures). Given the above described, such a project would take less than 6-months to complete as it involves a study of practicability and the procurement of equipment. The project would positively impact the welfare and resiliency of the local community and marina visitors (more than 10,000 people). These backup units would directly impact less than 1,000 inhabitants (marina customers). However, it can reduce risks associated with a power outage, one which can have a much broader effect at a marine facility (Ex. structural fire, sinking vessels and related fuel spillage, electrocution) Municipalities Miami * Portable Solar Generators Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Power Failure,Technologi cal Disruption,Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 2,874,900.00 79 11/29/2017 5 months The South-North path and great size of hurricane Irma exposed the vulnerability of the supply chain in Florida. Emergency supplies were being staged from Atlanta. However, the path of Irma brought it over South Florida and eventually to Atlanta as a tropical depression. Due the the storms route, emergency supplies could not leave Atlanta until after the storm passed the full- length of Florida then Atlanta, which added days to the delivery. Delays emphasized the need for the City of Miami to be more self-reliant. A portable solare generator has benefits over diesel generators. 1. No fuel required. 2. Less regular maintenance. 3. May be grid-connected to reduce or eliminate demand for diesel generators at buildings. 4. Avoid the ongoing maintenance issues of diesel generators which need to be periodically operated 5. May be used to charge a building or vehicles, depending on which has the greater need. 6. Solar generator may be used at sites with limited space which would make CO emissions from diesel generators dangerous. 7. Silent operation Municipalities Miami * Post-Storm Assessment Mobile Application-Citizen Portal Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Technologic al Disruption,Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 50,000.00 67 11/29/2017 1 month Post Irma, staff members from Planning, Zoning, and Resiliency, along with 4 volunteer teams from Grove 2030, canvassed the entire City. The goal was to locate the crest of storm surge created by the hurricane and changes to the City’s tree canopy. A mobile application called Survey123 for ArcGIS was utilized to add information to existing Geographic Information System maps in the City of Miami database. With this project, we would like to expand on further developing this application a front facing citizen portal which would facilitate assistance from the community regarding the recording of storm surge and changes to the tree canopy. Municipalities Miami * Sewell Park storm water management Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 6,224,495.00 67 11/30/2017 8 months Seawall rebuilding to allow an increased height in compliance for city code and reduce storm surge flooding. Retention and drainage design to allow park to accommodate increased volume of storm related water and allow flood control and mitigate potential damage impact to surrounding neighborhood. Municipalities Miami * Shorecrest/Belle Mead Storm Water Management and Flood Control Project, Phase I Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge PDM Identified Funding Source 4,200,000.00 81 Unknown This area of the City is at the forefront of sea level rise. We have been doing ongoing work here, including a resilient redesign workshop to examine how to adapt the neighborhood to sea level rise and the implementation of a King Tide Action Plan. It is a high priority for funding because of the frequency of some of the hazards this project will address (tidal/pluvial flooding) and the consequences of storm surge in the neighborhood. This neighborhood experienced surge and pluvial flooding due to Irma, and flood during the king tides every autumn. This project will provide storm sewers to the area bounded by NE 83rd Street, East Dixie Highway, North City limits and Biscayne Boulevard. Road improvements include milling and resurfacing, new or repair sidewalks, curb and gutter, ADA ramps, re-grade or re-sodding swale areas, repair or replace damaged or disfigured traffic signs, and tree planting. This project will address severe flooding issues that this neighborhood experiences from both natural disasters, pluvial floods, and king tides. The City of Miami is or will be partnering with Miami-Dade County, the South Florida Water Management District, and FDOT. Municipalities Miami * Spoil Islands breakwater.jetty implementation, inclusive of design study Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Storm Surge,Sea Level Rise HMGP Identified Funding Source 10,000,000.00 72 11/30/2017 1 year Analysis of impact of additional building of spoil islands along City of Miami Shorelines to assist in the protection of the waterfront and allow a buffer to tidal waves. Utilizing clean fill to build spoil islands. 52 of 93 218 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Miami * Streetend Improvements and Baywalks Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 2,544,000.00 78 11/29/2017 1 year Many streetends in the City of Miami are vulnerable to storm surge and king tide flooding. This project is to improve streetends with higher sea walls in the City of Miami and potentially design those sea-walls to serve dual uses, such as baywalk/sea wall combinations, as done in the Netherlands. It is a high priority due to the consequence of the hazard this project addresses, storm surge. Coastal flooding as a result of Hurricane Irma was extensive within the City of Miami. The following is an example of a project that would be funded with this project: • Edgewater is a high population density neighborhood on the coast north of downtown • Edgewater is in evacuation zone C, and is not considered to be vulnerable to high storm surge based on current modeling. • Based on initial studies, flooding in Edgewater exceeded predicted levels by 2-4’ which damaged cars and made buildings inaccessible. • Much of the storm surge entered the neighborhood via public-right-of way street ends that terminate at Biscayne Bay. • As this neighborhood is very low-lying on the east but rises up to the Atlantic Coastal Ridge to the west, it collects rainwater and is vulnerable to flooding from the combination of king tides and rainfall. Streets with low-lying outlets are particularly vulnerable. • The city would like to make improvements to the street ends in order to make them invulnerable to King Tides and more resistant to storm surge. • 35th street at the northern end of the neighborhood is a wider cul-de-sac and does not have building entrances or driveways near the water, ensuring that there is room for improvements with little regulatory conflict. • An example project would include the improvement of the following: o Seawall o drainage structures o A baywalk allowing pedestrian access to the North, South, and West to the bay o A stormwater retention/processing green infrastructure element to reduce flooding associated with rain and storms Municipalities Miami * Structural Upgrades to Manuel Artime Office Building Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 550,000.00 62 11/30/2017 6 months This project serves to improve on repairs already underway at the Manuel Artime Office Building located at 970 SW 1st Street. The Office Building is currently in need of structual repairs to prevent heavy water intrusion. This project aims at studying the feasibility of innovative upgrades to the building to further strengthen its resistances to wind/rain damage. Municipalities Miami * Tiger Dams (Dry Floodproofing + Road Barrier) Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Security Breach HMGP Identified Funding Source 409,000.00 84 11/29/2017 1 month Water-filled barriers that can be used for dry floodproofing during expected flooding events and for road barriers during special events. This project is for 2 trailers with the intent that one will be used at City Hall during known flooding events. We are proposing the purchase of vital equipment to be able to adapt to the ever changing climate that brings about sea level rise and increased flooding to the City of Miami. Tiger Dam Systems provides Emergency Managers a valuable tool to be able to minimize and mitigate the potential catastrophic losses to critical infrastructure due to flooding and sea level rise. One of the main functions/mission areas of Emergency Management is the Mitigation process and we believe by having Tiger Dam Systems, we can mitigate potential losses by preventing the water intrusion to critical buildings. It has been estimated that a $1 investment can reap $4 dollars of potential saving when disasters strike (MMCA). The Tiger Dam™ is used to create temporary dikes, protect critical infrastructure, divert river flow, keep roads open and protect essential utilities…..among a host of other applications. The rapid deployment system is both labor and energy efficient as well as environmentally friendly when compared to sandbags. As we continue to expand our Emergency Management programs, we are constantly looking to assure we can provide the needed services to the Citizens of the City of Miami. We feel strongly that being able to mitigate losses is a very cost effective alternative to have to rebuild, refurbish and/or try to recreate lost archives. Municipalities Miami ** JOINT PROJECT BETWEEN MIAMI- DADE COUNTY/CITY OF MIAMI/CITY OF MIAMI BEACH: Installation of 150 land-based flood gauges in GM&B Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 1,000,000.00 97 11/30/2017 6 months This project is to purchase and install 150 tidal gauges and associated telemetry systems and other materials throughout the City of Miami, the City of Miami Beach, and the Miami-Dade County coastal and riverine waterfront to monitor fluctuations in water surface height and create better predictability of the timing and degree of seasonal tidal and storm surge flooding. This will allow for improved response times and real data to test storm surge and tidal flood predictions and models. These would be installed and monitored in partnership with University and NOAA partners and the data would be publicly available. Data will be compared with ocean-based buoys in order to study the relationship between tides and flooding. Additionally, this will help us to create a region-wide flood warning system, which will positively affect the County's and the individual municipalities' CRS ratings. Currently the City of Miami relies on one tidal monitoring station installed and monitored by NOAA at Virginia Key. The City currently has no land based flood sensors. To document the flood extent of Hurricane Irma, for instance, the City of Miami used staff and volunteers to document high water lines and speak to residents. While this gave the City a relative idea of the flood extent, the data was not reliable for future predictability or modeling. Land based flood gauges could also be used to create baseline data before storm water and coastal infrastructure is installed. Municipalities Miami 77: S. Miami Ave and Side Street Drainage Improvements Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge PDM Identified Funding Source 3,500,000.00 77 Unknown This project will provide drainage improvements for the area approximately bounded by I-95 and East Coast Greenway, S. Miami Ave., SW 16 Rd., and SW 25 Rd. The new drainage facilities will include but may not be limited to a combination of exfiltration drains, deep drainage wells, and storm water pump station(s). Road improvements include milling and resurfacing, reconstruction, new or repair sidewalks, curb and gutter, ADA ramps, re-grade or re-sodding swale areas, repair or replace damaged or disfigured traffic signs, and tree plantings. Municipalities Miami Acquire Portable Pumps and Generators 50% complete Flood/Storm Surge PDM Identified Funding Source 70,000.00 79 Unknown Trailer-mounted portable pumps are needed to remove floodwaters during and after major storms. The City's Public Works Department has recently acquired four (4) portable trailer mounted pumps (6 inch suction pipe). In addition portable generators are needed to supply power to tools that are used in a variety of applications following a disaster. The city has identified a need for six of these portable generators. 53 of 93 219 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Miami African Square Park Impact Resistant Windows and Doors Installation Future Unfunded Project ,Wind,Security Breach HMGP Identified Funding Source 50,000.00 55 11/30/2017 4 months Replace all windows and doors at park facilities with Impact Resistant Glass. Installation will prevent damage in future storm conditions. Municipalities Miami Antonio Maceo Park Impact Resistant Windows and Doors Installation Future Unfunded Project ,Security Breach,Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 62,000.00 55 11/30/2017 4 months "Replace all windows and doors at park facilities with Impact Resistant Glass. Installation will prevent damage in future storm conditions.7 Large windows (do not open); 2 Narrow windows (do not open); 2 Regular doors Municipalities Miami Armbrister Park Impact Resistant Windows and Doors Installation Future Unfunded Project ,Wind,Security Breach HMGP Funding Secured 154,000.00 54 11/30/2017 4 months Replace all windows and doors at park facilities with Impact Resistant Glass. Installation will prevent damage in future storm conditions. 4- double doors, 5- single doors, 27 - windows Municipalities Miami Auburn Storm Sewers Project - Phase I and Phase II Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge PDM Identified Funding Source 4,000,000.00 74 Unknown This project involves construction of a local drainage system for the area bounded by N.W. 7th Street, N.W. 27th Avenue, W. Flagler Street, and N.W. 37th Avenue. Road improvements include milling and resurfacing, new or repair sidewalks, curb and gutter, ADA ramps, re-grade or re-sodding swale areas, repair or replace damaged or disfigured traffic signs, and tree planting. Municipalities Miami Auburn Storm Sewers Project - Phase III Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge PDM Identified Funding Source 5,300,000.00 73 Unknown This project will provide a modern drainage system for the area bordered by W. Flagler Street, SW 8th Street, SW 27th Avenue and SW 32nd Avenue. At the present time, this area is served by scattered localized drainage structures that are old and inadequate to properly drain the area. The new drainage facilities will consist of a combination of ex-filtration drains, deep drainage wells, grease & oil interceptors and other pollution control structures. Road improvements include milling and resurfacing, new or repair sidewalks, curb and gutter, ADA ramps, re-grade or re-sodding swale areas, repair or replace damaged or disfigured traffic signs, and tree planting Municipalities Miami Avalon Storm Sewers Project - Phase III Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge PDM Identified Funding Source 5,300,000.00 74 Unknown This project will provide a modern drainage system for the area bordered by SW 22nd Street, SW 27th Street, SW 27th Avenue and SW 32nd Avenue. Currently, this area is served by scattered localized drainage structures that are old and inadequate to properly drain the area. The new drainage facilities will consist of a combination of ex-filtration drains, deep drainage wells, grease & oil interceptors and other pollution control structures. Road improvements include milling and resurfacing, new or repair sidewalks, curb and gutter, ADA ramps, re-grade or re-sodding swale areas, repair or replace damaged or disfigured traffic signs, and tree planting. Municipalities Miami Backup for Essential City Mainframe Functions Future Unfunded Project ,Other,Technologi cal Disruption PDM Identified Funding Source 1,000,000.00 77 Unknown The city of Miami currently does not have a backup computer for the mainframe that provides core city services the city on day- to-day basis. Loss of the computer center at the Miami Riverside Center building would affect the city's ability to respond to and recover from a disaster by preventing access to critical functions such as payroll, purchasing, fire and police records, and other essential city services. A new backup computer system is needed to allow critical functions to be quickly restored and allow the city to continue operations while the main system is relocated or repaired. The new computer, to be installed in the city's emergency operations center, would replicate essential functions currently performed on the city's primary mainframe computer, but would not provide all of the functions needed by the city. Municipalities Miami Backup System for City Communications Future Unfunded Project Technological Disruption PDM Identified Funding Source 0.00 89 Unknown Communication is vital for the success of city in responding to and coordinating the efforts of various departments and agencies following a disaster. The city currently does not have sufficient redundancy designed or built into its radio and telecommunication systems. The city is proposing a three-level approach to ensure that it is able to maintain an effective communication system following a disaster. The first level is the use of satellite telephones (such as Iridium), which do not require any ground-based facilities. Each of these phones can communicate with other Iridium phones by using only the satellite system. Approximately 20 of these phones would provide a basic level of critical communications among the EOC, fire, police and the 13 NET centers located throughout the city. The second level of backup communication is to acquire a temporary radio tower, such as the portable trailers used following Hurricane Andrew to provide cellular phone service, that can be deployed and setup within a few hours of a disaster and restore some, if not most, of the capability of the radio system. The final phase would be a more comprehensive project that would backup all of the communication capabilities normally available to the city of Miami. Municipalities Miami Bayhomes Drive Neighborhood Drainage Improvements Future Unfunded Project ,Flood FMA Identified Funding Source 3,000,000.00 60 Unknown This project will provide drainage improvements for the area approximately bounded by Biscayne Bay, ~750 ft. northwest from N. Bayhomes Rd., N. Bayhomes Dr. and S. Bayhomes Drive. The new drainage facilities will include but may not be limited to a combination of exfiltration drains, deep drainage wells, and storm water pump station(s). Road improvements include milling and resurfacing, reconstruction, new or repair sidewalks, curb and gutter, ADA ramps, re-grade or re-sodding swale areas, repair or replace damaged or disfigured traffic signs, and tree plantings. Municipalities Miami Bird Avenue Road Improvement 25% complete ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge PDM Identified Funding Source 1,728,000.00 66 Unknown Located in the outskirts of Coconut Grove, the improvement works are mainly performed along Bird Avenue between Aviation Avenue and US 1. The main components of the project include the construction of drainage facilities consisting of a combination but not limited to exfiltration trenches (french drains), storm sewer pipes for gravity conveyance, baffles, manholes, catch basins, cross drains, swale trenches, re-grading and re-sodding swale areas. Road improvements include and not limited to roadway milling and resurfacing, ADA ramps, repair damaged sidewalks, curb and/or gutter, replacement of damaged or disfigured traffic signs and tree planting. Municipalities Miami Buena Vista Park Impact Resistant Windows and Doors Installation Future Unfunded Project ,Wind,Security Breach HMGP Identified Funding Source 10,000.00 55 11/30/2017 4 months Replace all windows and doors at park facilities with Impact Resistant Glass. Installation will prevent damage in future storm conditions. 1 Window, 1 Door Municipalities Miami Charles Hadley building needs elevated generator (food distribution site) Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Pow er Failure,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 175,000.00 81 11/30/2017 3 months Installation of a generator to allow facility to open immediately after a disaster in order to provide public support services such as food distribution, child care, donation collection etc. Municipalities Miami City Hall/Protection of Vital Records Project in Planning Stage All Hazards FMA Funding Secured 650,000.00 81 Unknown The project requires flood and wind-damage proofing of City Hall, a government hub, and historic structure that is significant to Florida and Aviation history as the Pan American Seaplane Terminal; City Hall's basement has flooded many times over the years with the most significant damage arising from Hurricane Andrew in 1992. The hurricane allowed seawater and wind to destroy historical records stored in the basement. The project has two inter-related elements to safeguard the structure from storm surge and wind damage. The first includes adding stormproof doors and seals on doors facing the bay; the second is replacing the entrance store front with front impact resistant glass doors and windows that meet 100-year storm code specifications and given the historic properties of the building, Secretary of the Interior Preservation standards. 54 of 93 220 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Miami City of Miami - Solid Waste Building Window/Doors Hardening Project Funding Applied for ,Wind PDM Identified Funding Source 421,100.00 79 2 Years This wind retrofit project will include: obtaining a structural adequacy report from a qualified registered Professional Engineer for the Solid Waste Main and Shop Building, located at 1290 N.W. 20th Street, Miami, FL 33142; replacement of the roof, installing approximately 3,200 square feet of �Sure Guard Plus 200� Window Security Barrier System for all existing glass windows; replacement of two (2) Solid Swing-Out Metal Doors at the Main Building and (2) Solid Swing-Out Metal Doors at the Shop Building; an Accordion shutter at the entrance of the Main Building; and tie downs for roof equipment at both buildings. Municipalities Miami Citywide Auger Hole Replacement Future Unfunded Project Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge PDM Identified Funding Source 2,500,000.00 86 Unknown There are existing auger hole drainage systems that do not comply with current City Standards and State Regulations. The City of Miami is seeking funding to replace the non-complaint systems with appropriate drainage infrastructure to address flooding concerns and reduce maintenance costs. Municipalities Miami Citywide Deep Drainage Wells Cleaning Future Unfunded Project Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge FMA Identified Funding Source 500,000.00 83 Unknown The city of Miami drainage basins are drained by a sizable number of deep drainage wells ranging in depth of 80 feet to 160 feet. A total of 90 deep drainage wells are scattered throughout the city. Periodic annual cleaning is required especially after a hurricane in the magnitude of Katrina where a tremendous amount of windblown leaves and debris clogged these wells. This project consists of the cleaning and jetting of these wells, and the installation of grates to prevent further clogging. Municipalities Miami Citywide Non-Standard Drainage System Improvements Future Unfunded Project Flood FMA Identified Funding Source 3,000,000.00 78 Unknown There are existing slab-covered trench, open-joint pipes, and others that are ineffective and do not comply with current City Standards. The City of Miami is seeking funding to replace the outdated systems with appropriate drainage infrastructure to address flooding concerns and reduce maintenance costs. Municipalities Miami Citywide North-South Storm Sewer Cleaning Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge,Flood PDM Identified Funding Source 5,000,000.00 88 Unknown The city of Miami has 25,000 inlets and 1,800,000 linear feet of various pipe size that require cleaning twice a year. Currently, in a normal year the Public Works Department is able to perform this cleaning using their own fleet of four Vac-trucks and also by subcontracting this service. However, this task has been made even more difficult by the huge amount of debris and leaves that got blown, or drained inside the inlets following Hurricane Katrina. Cleaning of these inlets and pipes is necessary to maintain the conveyance of the system and the level of protection against flooding. Municipalities Miami Citywide Outfalls Cleaning Future Unfunded Project Flood PDM Identified Funding Source 600,000.00 88 Unknown The city of Miami has 300 outfalls that stage control the amount of runoff and pollutant discharging into adjacent water bodies. After Hurricane Katrina, the amount of debris flushed into the drainage systems have been accumulated inside these control structure boxes and causing the headwater to rise, therefore increasing the likelihood of street flooding. These structures are being cleaned on a yearly basis. Municipalities Miami Clean and Dredge Canals and Waterways Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge PDM Identified Funding Source 45,000,000.00 73 Unknown Within the city of Miami, there are numerous canals and waterways that provide storm water drainage to Biscayne Bay. Debris, sand, and other materials that block the canals threaten their ability to provide essential drainage of stormwater to outfalls. The city proposes to mitigate this threat by performing maintenance dredging on these canals, removing exotic (non-native) trees from the banks, and cleaning up accumulated debris. The most important affected waterways, listed in order of priority, are: � Wagner Creek, which drains approximately 600 acres of residential and commercial property. Activities already completed include removal of household refuse and sediments, installation of new fencing, and bank stabilization activities. Pollution control measures will be added to the outfalls and any illegal connections identified during the cleanup will be disconnected and plugged. The canal sediments are also contaminated with dioxins/furans, and dredging the canal sediments will significantly reduce the dioxins amounts. This open channel creek extends from NW 20 Street to NW 11 Street. � Seybold Canal, a navigable waterway that drains approximately 500 acres of residential and commercial property. This canal extends from NW 11 Street to the Miami River. The canal sediments are also contaminated with dioxins/furans, and dredging the canal sediments will significantly reduce the dioxins amount. Lawrence Waterway, which drains approximately 64 acres of residential and commercial property. Some of the work already has been completed as part of the city's regular maintenance program. This waterway extends from NW 7 Street to the Miami River. The canal sediments are also contaminated with dioxins/furans, and dredging the canal sediments will significantly reduce the dioxins amounts. Miami River - South Fork, requires the dredging of sediment material along approximately 4,900 linear feet of the canal's bottom including removal of debris, and exotic tree removal from the banks between N.W. 27th Avenue to the Miami River. Further sampling will be conducted to determine if contamination exist in this area. Municipalities Miami Communications Systems Generator Funding Secured ,Other PDM Identified Funding Source 60,000.00 67 Unknown Communications Services Division 50 kilowatt emergency generator and transfer switch project that encompasses the following: Purchase and installation of a new 5 KW and transfer switch to provide electricity for the city's communications system in case of catastrophic electronic failure. This replaces the 31 KW generator and transfer switches that are inadequate for the city's existing needs. The generator is located at the city's fire garage. The existing area housing the 31 KW generator can accommodate the new generator that is compliant with current codes. Municipalities Miami Concrete fortified dock at Fort Dallas Park (Bijans site) Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 1,250,000.00 64 11/30/2017 6 months Given the physical damages related to storm surge and vessel damage, this project aims to study the feasibility of upgrading the Fort Dallas Park dock to a rugged concrete system. Municipalities Miami Curtis Park Impact Resistant Windows and Doors Installation Future Unfunded Project ,Wind,Security Breach HMGP Identified Funding Source 116,000.00 54 11/30/2017 4 months Replace all windows and doors at park facilities with Impact Resistant Glass. Installation will prevent damage in future storm conditions. Windows 18, doors 7, 2 french doors-Curtis park Municipalities Miami David Herring Center Backup Generator Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Pow er Failure,Sea Level Rise,Security Breach,Storm Surge,Technologic al Disruption,Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 150,000.00 80 11/30/2017 6 months The City of Miami is seeking to provide backup power for electrical systems in the building which provide for computers, servers, HVAC, lighting, etc. This building houses personnel from the Office of Emergency Management & Homeland Security as well as disaster readiness equipment (a majority of which are UASI purchased). The location is also designed to serve as a backup Emergency Operations Center and is critical to continuity of operations. 55 of 93 221 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Miami Debris Removal Plan Future Unfunded Project All Hazards PDM Identified Funding Source 0.00 90 Unknown The city presently maintains a list of contractors that have agreed to provide debris removal services following a disaster. The city would develop a Comprehensive Debris Clearance (CDC) plan that would list the names and phone numbers of debris removal contractors, identify potential debris storage sites, removal methods, and provide for special programs, such as hazardous materials pickup and amnesty days for residents. Contracts would be negotiated in advance and monetary damages would be due to the city if the contractor fails to perform. The study also would analyze how the city could best coordinate debris removal activities with related post-disaster services performed by Miami-Dade County. The city welcomes debris removal assistance along federal, state, and county roadways, but recognizes that it will need to provide its own service along most of the smaller, local roadways in Miami. Municipalities Miami Domino Park Impact Resistant Windows and Doors Installation Future Unfunded Project ,Wind,Security Breach HMGP Identified Funding Source 26,600.00 55 11/30/2017 4 months Replace all windows and doors at park facilities with Impact Resistant Glass. Installation will prevent damage in future storm conditions. 7 windows Municipalities Miami Dorsey Park Impact Resistant Windows and Doors Installation Future Unfunded Project ,Wind,Security Breach HMGP Identified Funding Source 54,000.00 55 11/30/2017 4 months "Replace all windows and doors at park facilities with Impact Resistant Glass. Installation will prevent damage in future storm conditions. 4 doors, 9 windows " Municipalities Miami Douglas building needs elevated generator (food distribution site) Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Pow er Failure,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 175,000.00 81 11/30/2017 3 months Installation of a generator to allow facility to open immediately after a disaster in order to provide public support services such as food distribution, child care, donation collection etc. Municipalities Miami Douglas Park Neighborhood Drainage Improvements Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge FMA Identified Funding Source 2,000,000.00 81 Unknown This project will provide drainage improvements for the area bordered by US-1, SW 22nd Street, SW 32th Avenue and SW 37th Avenue. The new drainage facilities will include but may not be limited to a combination of ex filtration drains, deep drainage wells, and storm water pump station(s). Road improvements include milling and resurfacing, reconstruction, new or repair sidewalks, curb and gutter, ADA ramps, re-grade or re-sodding swale areas, repair or replace damaged or disfigured traffic signs, and tree plantings. Municipalities Miami Eaton Park Day Care Impact Resistant Windows and Doors Installation Future Unfunded Project ,Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 50,000.00 62 11/30/2017 4 months Replace all windows and doors at park facilities with Impact Resistant Glass. Installation will prevent damage in future storm conditions. Lobby – 1 Glass double door; 7 small windows 2 Large window Municipalities Miami Electrical/Plumbing Upgrades to Dinner Key Marina Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 3,500,000.00 65 11/30/2017 6 months This project consists of upgrading the electrical components/conduits, piping, plumbing, and connections suppling Dinner Key Marina (3400 Pan American Dr) docks to a level which would withstand damage from storm surge or floods. A critical element of this work is improved access controls which would allow emergency workers and City staff to further prevent hazardous conditions in the event of a disaster. These upgrades are essential in preventing electrical fires, electrocution, water/sewage leaks in the event of the catastrophic storm. During Hurricane Irma, City staff and vendors reported various incidents of the above mentioned threats, which could be more severe in the event of a major catastrophic storm. Hence, these upgrades address the protection from 3 hazards (life-safety, environmental, and property/structure damage). Hazardous conditions arising from a potential electrical fire or sewage/water leak have the highest impact on life-safety and health at Dinner Key Marina, as it resides near residential/commercial areas (particularly, the Coconut Grove area); one which maintains a high volume of restaurants, attractions, and related foot-traffic. Thus, given that magnitude of a declared incident, such hazards may impact more than 10,000 local inhabitants, aside from having adverse effects on the environment. Hardening such infrastructure to withstand damages like those experienced during Hurricane Irma (or stronger storms) necessitates the use of robust measures capable of protecting a network of public assets worth over $75 million dollars. Given the above described, such a project would take 1 - 3 years to complete as it involves complex work and design. However, the project would positively impact the welfare and resiliency of the local community and its visitors (more than 10,000 people a year). Municipalities Miami Elevation of Pumpout Room at Dinner Key Marina and required electrical work Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 425,000.00 61 11/30/2017 6 months This project involves the elevation and rewiring of the Dinner Key pumpout building to protect it from flood/storm surge damage much like that experienced during Hurricane Irma. The pumpout room is a critical component of Dinner Key Marina’s vessel sewage/disposal system which serves approximately 500 slips at the marina. During Hurricane Irma, a 3 to 5 foot storm surge entered the Dinner Key premise from Biscayne Bay and flooded much of the marina property. The marina’s pump-house is about 5ft underground with 1.5ft retainage (step). In consequence, the pump-house became flooded. Currently, the marinas vacuum pump and electrical connections are located close to the floor of the pump-house making it susceptible to water intrusion damage. These upgrades are critical in preventing electrical fires, electrocution, sewage/water leaks in the event of storm surge greater than 2ft. After Hurricane Irma, Dinner Key Marina’s pump out components were disabled, preventing the marina from providing waste-water services to its customers. Hence, this upgrade addresses the protection from 3 hazards (life-safety, environmental, and property/structure damage). A sewage/water leak has the highest impact on life-safety and health as Dinner Key Marina resides near a residential area/commercial area (Coconut Grove area), one which maintains a high volume of restaurants, attractions, and related foot-traffic. A sewage/water leak resulting from a damage pumpout system may directly impact more than 1,000 persons (customers/staff), aside from having adverse effects on the environment. However, depending on the condition of the underling plumbing infrastructure, it may impact more than 10,000 people (local residents/businesses). In addition, it is important to consider that maintaining this facility operational after a storm may directly reduce the likelihood of voluntary sewage discharge (boaters) of waste water into local waterways following a catastrophic event. Elevating and protecting this asset can repeatedly prevent an estimated $100,000- $200,000 of damages to system components after a major flood. In addition, such upgrade may extend the life-span of the system over 20 years. Given the above described, such a project would take 1 to 2 years complete as it involves complex work and design. 56 of 93 222 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Miami Elizabeth Virrick building needs elevated generator (food distribution site) Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Pow er Failure,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 175,000.00 81 11/30/2017 3 months Installation of a generator to allow facility to open immediately after a disaster in order to provide public support services such as food distribution, child care, donation collection etc. Municipalities Miami Fairway Storm Sewers Project Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge PDM Identified Funding Source 4,200,000.00 74 Unknown This project involves the design and construction of a local drainage system in the area bounded by NW 2nd Avenue, FEC Railroad, N 73rd Street, and N 62nd Street. Road improvements include milling and resurfacing, new or repair sidewalks, curb and gutter, ADA ramps, re-grade or re-sodding swale areas, repair or replace damaged or disfigured traffic signs, and tree planting Municipalities Miami Fire Station Hardening Funding Secured ,Wind PDM Identified Funding Source 144,000.00 78 Unknown The Miami Fire Department provides on-going E.M.S., fire suppression and fire prevention services to our 362,470 residents and the 480,000 individuals who traverse our city daily. Most of these services begin with a call to and response from one of 14 fire stations. The impact of a hurricane could severely damage fire stations as well as the expensive apparatus that is housed within these stations. Some fire stations are more vulnerable than others; therefore, they are more susceptible to impending hurricane damages. To mitigate these impending hurricane damages, the city of Miami Fire Rescue Department proposes a hurricane hardening project to protect key stations and facilities. This project includes the installation of Miami-Dade County hurricane- code approved, perforated, stainless steel hurricane barriers, e.g., Exeter Storm Shield or better and the installation of generators at stations. This project also includes the installation of two generators at the Fire Training Center/City Backup 911 Center. Municipalities Miami Flood-Proof First Floor of Main Police Building Future Unfunded Project ,Flood FMA Identified Funding Source 750,000.00 78 Unknown The first floor of the main Police Building (located at 400 NW 2nd Street) is below grade and is currently being used to store the records, property, and evidence for the city of Miami. These items must be maintained in a secure area to prevent improper access while allowing use by police for on-going investigations. The proposed mitigation project would prevent water from entering the first floor and provide a water removal system to protect the building from flooding. The project would include installation of floodgates that would be put into place during high-risk periods for flooding. This would not only protect vital police records, but would ensure the continuous operation of this critical facility both during the disaster and during the response and recovery phase of the disaster. Municipalities Miami Floodproofing for Residences Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise HMGP/FMA Identified Funding Source 900,000.00 68 12/22/2017 2 years This project is to raise the homes of residents that have been previously affected by flooding. Residents will be expected to pay a 25% cost match with the grant funding not more than $150,000. This will fund a maximum of 6 homes. Municipalities Miami Flood-Proofing Government Buildings GSA/Miami Riverside Center Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge,Flood FMA Identified Funding Source 7,000,000.00 83 Unknown The main Police Building and the Riverside Government Building (444 SW 2nd Avenue) need the installation of waterproofing elements. The areas critical to address in the Riverside building are the first, ninth, and tenth floor glass window areas. This will protect against flying debris, explosions, firebombs, glass shattering, and ultra-violet protection. Building is used during emergency activation for EOC functions. Municipalities Miami Fortification of City Hall basement for up to 3-5 foot surge Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 2,500,000.00 70 11/30/2017 6 months This project consists of an inspection of the current City Hall basement and presentation of feasibility/costs of solutions to fortify the basement from 3-5 foot+ storm/surge or flood waters. This project aims at finding a feasible solution to prevent flooding in the basement of the historic City Hall building located at 3500 Pan American Dr. Such an improvement would allow the foundation and contents to be protected from intruding waters as of a result of a hurricane or tropical storm. During Hurricane Irma, Dinner Key Marina incurred damages in excess of $100,000 in operational equipment alone. Some of this equipment was stored in the City hall basement and subsequently damaged by storm surge. This equipment is critical to every- day operations of the marina and the maintenance of the surrounding property. Fortifying the historic City Hall structure can prevent damage to its foundation and infrastructure. Given the above described, such a project would take less than 6 months to complete as it involves a site assessment & feasibility study. Municipalities Miami Garden Storm Sewers Project -Phase II Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge PDM Identified Funding Source 4,300,000.00 74 Unknown This project will provide a modern drainage system for the area bordered by NW 26th Street, NW 38th Street, NW 22nd Avenue and NW 27th Avenue. The new drainage facilities will consist of a combination of ex-filtration drains, grease & oil interceptors and other pollution control structures. Municipalities Miami Generator for Riverside Center Building Future Unfunded Project ,Power Failure PDM Identified Funding Source 1,000,000.00 77 Unknown Request is for a 1600 KVA emergency power generator; this will provide constant electrical power to the Miami Riverside Center Building. This will minimize downtime and allow operations to continue at the MRC without interruption. This estimate was based on a cost of $500 per KVA plus $200,000 for labor and materials for the installation. Municipalities Miami Gibson Park building needs elevated generator (food distribution site) Future Unfunded Project ,Storm Surge,Sea Level Rise,Power Failure,Health,Flo od/Storm Surge,Flood HMGP Identified Funding Source 175,000.00 81 11/30/2017 3 months Installation of a generator to allow facility to open immediately after a disaster in order to provide public support services such as food distribution, child care, donation collection etc. Municipalities Miami Grapeland Park building needs elevated generator (food distribution site) Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Power Failure,Health,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 175,000.00 81 11/30/2017 3 months Installation of a generator to allow facility to open immediately after a disaster in order to provide public support services such as food distribution, child care, donation collection etc. Municipalities Miami Hadley Park Neighborhood Drainage Improvements Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge PDM Identified Funding Source 9,500,000.00 76 11/7/2014 Unknown The scope of work consists of furnishing all materials, labor, and equipment necessary to design and construct drainage and road improvements at needed locations within the highest rank basin according to the City of Miami Stormwater Management Master Plan. The basin is approximately bounded by NW 54 St (to the north), SR 112 (to the south), NW 19 Ave (west), and I-95 (to the east). The drainage system mainly comprises exfiltration trench (french drains), storm sewers for gravity conveyance, inlets with pollution retardant baffles, injection wells, and surface restoration within the project limits. Road work comprises roadway milling & resurfacing, limited road reconstruction, damaged sidewalk replacement, new sidewalks, new curb and gutter or repair of curb & gutter, some new tree plantings, retrofit of ADA complaint curb ramps, and pavement markings within the project limits. 57 of 93 223 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Miami Harden Neighborhood Enhancement Team Centers Future Unfunded Project All Hazards PDM Identified Funding Source 1,300,000.00 83 Unknown The city of Miami operates 13 Neighborhood Enhancement Team (NET) centers located throughout the city. These centers are designed to provide essential services and disaster information to the local communities, improve communication between the city and its citizens, and provide a central source for services, supplies, and information. Originally developed in 1992, these centers have been well received by the citizens and have shown their value repeatedly in non-disaster applications. The NET Centers are well equipped to serve as disaster field offices for the city and a distribution site for relief goods such as ice, food, and water. Because these centers can provide such a vital service to the city's residents, the city is proposing to make the buildings more resistant to damage from a hurricane or other disasters. Improvements that could be made to these structures include providing emergency generators, storm shutters, flood proofing, and structural strengthening. All of these improvements would allow the centers to become fully operational immediately after the disasters. Municipalities Miami Hardening electrical breaker boxes and transformers for Miamarina Bayside Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Power Failure,Security Breach,Storm Surge,Technologic al Disruption,Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 150,000.00 59 11/30/2017 6 months Given damages sustained during Hurricane Irma and to address the immediate needs of marina customers (safety, power, water) in such incident. This project aims at upgrading eastside and northern electrical power equipment boxes, strengthening them to be able to resist physical damage from vessels which may collide with dock and or pier. Municipalities Miami Henderson Park Impact Resistant Windows and Doors Installation Future Unfunded Project ,Wind,Security Breach HMGP Identified Funding Source 48,000.00 55 11/30/2017 4 months "Replace all windows and doors at park facilities with Impact Resistant Glass. Installation will prevent damage in future storm conditions. single doors = 4, windows = 4, double doors = 2 " Municipalities Miami Hurricane Window Barriers for Park Recreation Buildings Funding Secured ,Wind PDM Identified Funding Source 250,000.00 81 Unknown As a significant component of the 2001 Homeland Defense Neighborhood Improvement Bond Program, the Department of Capital Improvements will undertake the renovation and/or expansion of over 27 recreation buildings in city of Miami parks, and will construct 3 new additional recreation buildings. As part of this construction, we will include new Storm Shield hurricane barriers that comply with the Florida Building Code and Miami-Dade County Hurricane Product Approval Program. This will not only provide sufficient storm protection for the buildings and their contents, but will also eliminate or dramatically reduce costly pre-storm event labor charges associated with the installation of traditional storm shutters. Municipalities Miami Jose Marti building needs elevated generator (food distribution site) Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Power Failure,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 175,000.00 81 11/30/2017 3 months Installation of a generator to allow facility to open immediately after a disaster in order to provide public support services such as food distribution, child care, donation collection etc. Municipalities Miami Kennedy Park Floating Dock, Phase I Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge PDM Identified Funding Source 2,000,000.00 50 Unknown The City of Miami's Kennedy Park is approximate to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway and offers the public use of a floating dock for small craft use. The dock can no longer be repaired and must be replaced with a new dock. This will require the demolition of the existing dock and design, permitting and construction of a new floating dock. Municipalities Miami Kennedy Park Shoreline Stabilization, Phase I Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge FMA Identified Funding Source 2,000,000.00 71 Unknown This shoreline restoration project is necessary to return the tidal flow to the mangroves along the shoreline of Kennedy Park in Coconut Grove. Shoreline stabilization will allow greater public access to the water from the upland and bring a tremendous public benefit to a highly used park located on Biscayne Bay and the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Municipalities Miami Kinloch Park Impact Resistant Windows and Doors Installation Future Unfunded Project ,Security Breach,Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 71,000.00 55 11/30/2017 4 months "Replace all windows and doors at park facilities with Impact Resistant Glass. Installation will prevent damage in future storm conditions. Regular Doors doors (single) - 2; Sliding windows – 6; Windows (do not open) – 8; 2 - narrow windows that do not open on both sides of the main entrance glass doors " Municipalities Miami Kirk Munroe Park Impact Resistant Windows and Doors Installation Future Unfunded Project ,Wind,Security Breach HMGP Identified Funding Source 20,000.00 55 11/30/2017 4 months Replace all windows and doors at park facilities with Impact Resistant Glass. Installation will prevent damage in future storm conditions. 1 single door, 2 small windows, 2 large windows Municipalities Miami Lawnview Storm Sewers Project Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge PDM Identified Funding Source 4,300,000.00 71 Unknown This project involves construction of a local drainage system for the area bounded by SW 8th Street, and SW 17th Avenue, W. Flagler Street, and SW 22nd Avenue. Road improvements include milling and resurfacing, new or repair sidewalks, curb and gutter, ADA ramps, re-grade or re-sodding swale areas, repair or replace damaged or disfigured traffic signs, and tree planting. Municipalities Miami Legion Park Impact Resistant Windows and Doors Installation Future Unfunded Project ,Wind,Security Breach HMGP Identified Funding Source 200,000.00 54 11/30/2017 4 months Replace all windows and doors at park facilities with Impact Resistant Glass. Installation will prevent damage in future storm conditions. Municipalities Miami Lemon City Park Day Care Impact Resistant Windows and Doors Installation Future Unfunded Project ,Security Breach,Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 128,000.00 61 11/30/2017 4 months Replace all windows and doors at park facilities with Impact Resistant Glass. Installation will prevent damage in future storm conditions. Lobby – 1 Double Glass Door; 21 small window panes; 4 double window; 2 regular window Classroom – 3 small windows; Doors – 3 Exterior doors Municipalities Miami Lemon City Park Impact Resistant Windows and Doors Installation Future Unfunded Project ,Wind,Security Breach HMGP Identified Funding Source 38,000.00 55 11/30/2017 4 months Replace all windows and doors at park facilities with Impact Resistant Glass. Installation will prevent damage in future storm conditions. 6 glass windows and 3 glass doors Municipalities Miami Liberty Storm Sewers Project Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge FMA Identified Funding Source 4,200,000.00 70 Unknown This project involves the design and construction of a local drainage system in the area bounded by NW 17th Avenue, NW 71st Street, NW 12th Avenue, and NW 62nd Street. 58 of 93 224 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Miami Little Haiti Park Future Unfunded Project All Hazards PDM Identified Funding Source 180,000.00 66 Unknown Upon the successful completion of land acquisition for the subject property, that is, the one-block area bounded on west by NE 2nd Avenue, on the north by NE 61st Street, on the east by the FEC Railway corridor and on the south by NE 60th Street, the city of Miami proposes to create the following, as is also depicted on the site plan. The historic buildings at the northwest corner of the block, the former DuPuis Medical Office and Pharmacy will remain in place and be incorporated into a cultural and recreation center as an adaptive re-use, with restoration to follow historic preservation guidelines. Similarly the small cottages located now in the southwest area of the block will be relocated closer to the DuPuis building and restored for adaptive re-use as classrooms, interpretive exhibit spaces and/or studios as part of the cultural and recreation center. All other structures that presently exist on the property are proposed for demolition. Parking for this facility will likely be located in an area to the south, outside of the grant-funded boundary. The central area of the site would be utilized as an open meadow or multi-purpose field, which would be graded and landscaped with sod and native trees at its perimeter. In the eastern third of the block, the existing hardwood, rockland hammock would be enhanced by the removal of exotic plant species and the planting of additional native trees. Nature trails and interpretive signage would be introduced throughout the hammock, and will connect to trails along the perimeter of the site. Within the hammock, we propose to place picnic tables, and just outside the hammock to the west, will be a small children's playground. Park bench seating will occur at appropriate areas along the trails and at the playground. Defined park entries will be placed at the four corners of this site. To address potential hazard mitigation, shutters or impact resistant windows will be used in the historic structures, as required under the Florida Building Code. Likewise, the trailers, non-historic buildings and other site features will be removed, reducing potential flooding damage. The entire site will be graded and swales will be created to retain water on site. Municipalities Miami Little River Storm Sewers Retrofitting Project, Phase II Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge PDM Identified Funding Source 3,000,000.00 74 Unknown This project will provide a modern drainage system for the area bordered by NW 79th Street, Little River Canal, and N. Miami Avenue. The existing system will be expanded and upgraded. The new drainage facilities will consist of a combination of ex- filtration drain, deep drainage wells, grease & oil interceptors and other pollution control structures. Any storm sewers identified as illegally connected to a sanitary sewer will be disconnected. Municipalities Miami Loans to Private Owners to Improve Seawalls & Stabilize Shorelines Future Unfunded Project Sea Level Rise PDM Identified Funding Source 250,000.00 62 Unknown The majority of the city's canal and bay shoreline (70 percent) is privately owned and maintained, much of which is in poor or overgrown condition. In the event of a major storm, there could be tremendous loss of property into the city's drainage canals, causing upstream flooding. This project recognizes the need to harden seawalls on private property within the city and would complement the replacement and improvement of city-owned seawalls. The city would establish a loan program that would provide an incentive for private property owners to replace or improve areas of deteriorating seawall on their property, allowing for a greater overall level of mitigation citywide. The project includes establishing and administering the loan program but not actually providing city funding to borrowers. Municipalities Miami Low Power Portable Radio Stations Future Unfunded Project Communications Failure PDM Identified Funding Source 0.00 88 Unknown Low power portable radio stations would allow for the transmission of vital and time critical information to the public. These units are small trailer units similar to those used to provide information to motorists about a variety of topics, such as airport information, roadway construction warnings, parks and recreation information, etc. They have a short range (approximately three miles in most cases) and can be set up quickly. The units would be used throughout a disaster. Initially, they would be used during evacuations to provide information about traffic routes, blocked roadways and other key information. Following a disaster, these units could be used in conjunction with Miami's NET Centers and broadcast information about the locations of food and medical centers, ice distribution centers, and other critical information without the delays associated with other media. Another benefit is that this information can be specifically targeted to the local people (e.g., those within a single NET service area) and not the entire region. The mobile radio stations also could be used to provide information about hazardous material spills, other police or fire emergencies, and special events. The city of Miami proposes to acquire seven of these units to properly cover the city. Municipalities Miami Lummus Park Impact Resistant Windows and Doors Installation Future Unfunded Project ,Wind,Security Breach HMGP Identified Funding Source 50,000.00 60 11/30/2017 4 months Replace all windows and doors at park facilities with Impact Resistant Glass. Installation will prevent damage in future storm conditions. Municipalities Miami Mary Brickell Village Drainage Improvements Future Unfunded Project ,Flood PDM Identified Funding Source 1,400,000.00 89 Unknown Road and drainage infrastructure improvements will be performed in the area bounded by the Miami River, SW 9th Street, SE 1st Avenue, SW 12th Street and SW 1st Court. At a minimum, the new drainage facilities include a combination of exfiltration trenches (French drains), storm sewer pipes for gravity conveyance, baffles, manholes, catch basins, cross drains, swale trenches, re-grading and re-sodding swale areas. Miscellaneous road improvements include but not limited to roadway milling and resurfacing, ADA ramps repair damaged sidewalks, curb and/or gutter, replacement of damaged or disfigured traffic signs and tree planting. Municipalities Miami Master Plan for Virginia Key Future Unfunded Project All Hazards PDM Identified Funding Source 550,000.00 79 Unknown Planning will submit a proposal under the Coastal Partnership Initiative for a Virginia Key master plan. That plan will include provisions for restoring natural tidal action near the historic African American beach. Such restoration would contribute towards a mitigation of beach erosion. The plan recognizes the importance of natural plant communities and habitats and the role each play in stabilizing the soil for this natural barrier island. As stated in the proposal: �The process of a new master plan, taking into account the entire island, while including all stake holders and the public, will allow for a comprehensive process to address a very complex barrier island. The plan which includes economic, environmental, architectural, design, traffic, and landscaping criteria will give the new master plan concrete proposals to insure sound land use decisions for this unique uninhabited barrier island.� Municipalities Miami Miami Police Department Central Headquarters Roof Hardening Helipad Project Future Unfunded Project ,Other PDM Identified Funding Source 1,600,000.00 81 Unknown The City of Miami is seeking funding to �harden� the roof of its police headquarters building. The headquarters building which is 5 stories in height and approximately 400,000 square feet, houses the 911 call center for both police and fire, an Emergency Operations Center, all administrative offices of the police department, including the office of the Chief of Police and the Deputy and Assistant Chiefs, Crime Scene investigations, a computer server room and numerous other critical functions. A direct hit by a hurricane or strong windstorm could cause serious damage to the building and its contents and render this 31 million dollar building un-useable. The roof of the Police headquarters serves a dual function of protecting the building and serving as a Helipad for multiagency first responders in the event of a disaster. Municipalities Miami Miami River Greenway NW 5th Street Bridge Approach Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge FMA Identified Funding Source 640,000.00 68 Unknown To comply with Miami River Greenway Standard Guidelines, road and drainage improvements will be performed at the NW 5th Street Bridge. The project area is located along the NW South River Drive within the vicinity of NW 5th Street. At a minimum, the new drainage facilities will have a combination of exfiltration trenches (French drains), storm sewer pipes for gravity conveyance, baffles, manholes, catch basins, cross drains, swale trenches, re-grading and re-sodding swale areas. Miscellaneous road improvements include but not limited to roadway milling and resurfacing, ADA ramps, repair damaged sidewalks, curb and/or gutter, replacement of damaged or disfigured traffic signs and tree planting 59 of 93 225 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Miami Miami Rowing Center building needs elevated generator (food distribution site) Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Power Failure,Health,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 175,000.00 81 11/30/2017 3 months Installation of a generator to allow facility to open immediately after a disaster in order to provide public support services such as food distribution, child care, donation collection etc. Municipalities Miami Miami Rowing Center Impact Resistant Windows and Doors Installation Future Unfunded Project ,Wind,Security Breach HMGP Identified Funding Source 125,000.00 55 11/30/2017 4 months "Replace all windows and doors at park facilities with Impact Resistant Glass. Installation will prevent damage in future storm conditions. 15 single windows 7 double windows, 2 doors, 1 small rectangle by the door, 2 part sliding door (3 windows each) Municipalities Miami Mitigation & Resiliency Initiative for Historic Neighborhoods in the City of Miami Funding Secured ,Flood,Wind This project could potentially be funded by grants or through the City of Miami LMS budget. 139,500.00 66 12/17/2015 5-8 Months I. Project Goals: To reduce risks for historic neighborhoods by developing guidelines on risk-based performance goals and criteria for inclusion in current or adjusted local preservation standards, or for voluntary reference (historic- residential and commercial buildings). Overlap data sets regarding geological morphology, urban morphology, architectural typology, structural systems and storm surge information, to calibrate local needs and risks, to later inform best practices guidelines for historic neighborhoods and departmental preservation tools. II. Study Area: Referencing geological morphologies, (i.e. coastal, riverfront and previous hardwood hammock substrata sites- now urbanized), sample 30 blocks (~ approximately 10 per type), which also possess paradigmatic characteristics that define historic neighborhoods and their building types, with a focus on sites vulnerable to SLR and/or storm surge. III. Phases of Work (Estimated Timelines and Estimated Budgets): Phase I: (~5 - 8 months) Estimated Budget: $139,500 1. Data Collection: a. Gather relevant geological mapping data; Flood Hazard Mapping and Storm Surge data; b. Identify paradigmatic historic neighborhood blocks and cross reference with geological mapping data; c. Identify urban morphology as well as historic typologies and their corresponding structural type; d. Map historic building typologies and structural types, by utilizing ARC-GIS platform or equivalent; 2. Consultations: With Miami-Dade Office of Resiliency and other Southeast Florida Regional Compact Leaders to gather lessons related to regional strategies and tools and to maximize gains, as relates to historic neighborhoods and buildings. a. Identify barriers and constraints preventing resilience, including regulatory, funding, and jurisdictional impediments that prevent effective response to the resilience challenges; b. Break down silos separating multiple functional areas of resilience planning; c. Build relationships from the different disciplines of resilience planning; and, Municipalities Miami Moore Tennis Park Resistant Windows and Doors Installation Future Unfunded Project ,Wind,Security Breach HMGP Identified Funding Source 64,000.00 55 11/30/2017 4 months Replace all windows and doors at park facilities with Impact Resistant Glass. Installation will prevent damage in future storm conditions. 3 doors, 13 windows Municipalities Miami Morningside Park Impact Resistant Windows and Doors Installation Future Unfunded Project ,Wind,Security Breach HMGP Identified Funding Source 71,800.00 55 11/30/2017 4 months "Replace all windows and doors at park facilities with Impact Resistant Glass. Installation will prevent damage in future storm conditions. Single Doors: 8 Double Doors: 1 Windows:7 Municipalities Miami N.W. 71st Street Main Trunk Storm Sewer Project Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge PDM Identified Funding Source 7,500,000.00 76 Unknown This project will provide positive drainage for N 71st Street between NW 17 Avenue and Miami Avenue and also provide a relief system and overflow connection for the Liberty, Fairway, and Northwest storm sewer district project. This project is a recommendation of the Storm Drainage Master Plan. The trunk main will be constructed in N. 71st Street to either N. Miami Avenue or NE 2nd Avenue at which point the main will be extended north to the Little River Canal. Municipalities Miami New elevated Storage Shed for Dinner Key Marina (storage of tools/ equipment / golf carts) Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 335,000.00 59 11/30/2017 6 months This project aims at constructing an elevated storage building at the Dinner Key site, allowing Marina staff to safely protect tools/equipment/vehicles from flood waters/or storm surge. During Hurricane Irma, Dinner Key Marina incurred damages in excess of $100,000 in operational equipment alone. A good majority of this equipment succumbed to water intrusion damages and included: golf carts, forklift, generators, power-tools, hand-tools, lawn-maintenance equipment, and operating supplies. This equipment is vital to every-day marina operations and the maintenance of surrounding property. Such project will involve the construction of an elevated and fortified structure which would allow for the safe storage of marina assets in the event of a major hurricane/tropical storm. Further, it is important to consider the inadequacies of the marina’s current storage area: it does not effectively protect its contents from flood waters, it has limited space (much less than required), and may not withstand a stronger occurrence of said declaration (alloy structure). Further, this project would weigh on the advantages/disadvantages of storing equipment near a high-risk area (waterfront property) given experiences noted during Hurricane Irma. For example, marina staff (force labor) were ill-equipped for rapid mobilization and debris cleanup as almost all essential equipment/tools were destroyed. This required the City to procure external contract work and rental equipment. Protecting such assets in a fortified structure can prevent well-over $100,000 of property damages and potentially avoid tens of thousands more in recovery work. Given the above described, such a project would take 1 to 2 years complete as it involves design work and construction. 60 of 93 226 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Miami New/improved (removable) floating docks/or other marine infrastructure innovation for Boat Ramps at Seminole/Watson Boat Ramps Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 900,000.00 68 11/30/2017 6 months This is a study and realization (construction) of innovative hardening solutions to City Boat ramps which would assist in protecting/recovering from a major storm or adjust to impending sea-level rise. The study would focus on floating dock and rigging systems (permanent in nature) which can be easily removed and redeployed at the onset of a storm (repetitively). The work would involve an engineering/environmental review and construction of replaceable/moveable floating dock system. Such work, would aim at increasing the life-span of two of the Cities largest boat ramp (launch) facilities, to between 20-39 years. During Hurricane Irma, the City’s Watson Island and Seminole Boat Ramp facilities experienced extensive damage from 3-5 foot storm surge. Such damage included, direct water damage (flood), physical damage, and the release of related debris. The storm surge exerted undesirable buoyancy to the facilities’ finger pier and ramp structure(s). This damaged, coupled with sunken vessels/debris forced the City to make a precautionary (life/safety) decision to close these boat launch areas to the public. Seminole Boat Ramp resides near Dinner Key; that which is located in close proximity to a residential /commercial area. The boat ramps are regularly used access points by residents, visitors, businesses, staff, and emergency services. Given the utility year- round, disabling such a facility may impact over 10,000 people any given year. This upgrade project would address the protection from 3 hazards (life-safety, environmental, and damages to property/structures). Based on the damaged assessed in the declared incident, the destruction of the boat ramp created an unhospitable area in/and around the boat ramp shoreline, which included submerged debris, vessels, broken docks, and loose pilings. Because of the location and accessibility of these facilities, it is difficult for the City to control access to the public without dedicating a significant amount of public safety, security, and administrative resources. The successful completion of such improvements will reduce the time it will take the marine facility to avail access to the connected waterways. Further, the speed at which these facilities recover post-storm benefits federal, state, local emergency services in granting alternative access points to response vessels. The ability for these ramps to become operational shortly after a storm positively enforces the overall recovery of local business and leisure activities. Given the described, such a project would likely take 6 months to 1 year to complete as it involves a feasibility/design phase and the installation of movable structures. The combined project (Watson Island/Seminole Boat Ramp) would positively impact the welfare and resiliency of the local community, surrounding waterways, and impact more than 10,000 people in a given year. Municipalities Miami Over town Greenway Phase I Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge PDM Identified Funding Source 3,000,000.00 70 Unknown The project's concept is to create a greenway within the city's right-of-way. The work will be performed along NW 11th Terrace, from NW 3rd Avenue and NW 7th Avenue. The scope of work shall include and is not limited to landscaping, widening sidewalks, pedestrian and street lighting and way-finding signage. Drainage improvements shall involve an evaluation of existing drainage conditions, developing and recommending cost-effective alternative design alternatives to alleviate flooding in the area. Municipalities Miami Peacock Park Impact Resistant Windows and Doors Installation Future Unfunded Project ,Wind,Security Breach HMGP Identified Funding Source 500,000.00 54 11/30/2017 4 months Replace all windows and doors at park facilities with Impact Resistant Glass. Installation will prevent damage in future storm conditions. Windows – 144; Doors-2 Double 1 Single (Recreation side) Windows – 13; Doors 4 (Restaurant side) Municipalities Miami Peacock Park Shoreline hardening and walkway along Biscayne Bay (2) Stand up paddle launch Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 3,805,058.00 67 11/30/2017 8 months Replacement of current boardwalk with pre-cast concrete walkways that can withstand storm water and reduce impact from a disaster and maintain public use, include in the design a stand up paddleboard launch to provide access to the water to the public. Waterfront hardening to reduce flood impact with appropriate materials requires study of the area to detirmine appropriate Municipalities Miami Portable Traffic Control Signs Future Unfunded Project All Hazards PDM Identified Funding Source 500,000.00 74 Unknown Effective and efficient communication is vital to allow for the rapid evacuation of citizens prior to the impact of a hurricane in the city of Miami. With a residential population of about 400,000 people and a commuter population that at least doubles the affected population during the work week, traffic jams are a certainty. Portable traffic control signs that provide scrolling text messages would allow traffic to be directed to alternative routes and to provide other vital information to motorists. The portable signs have other uses besides assisting in evacuations: they can be used to display information during events such as fire/rescue emergencies, hazardous material spills, special events, terrorist incidents, and special police events such as SWAT operations. These signs display a text message that is easily programmed into the unit and can be moved using most any city vehicle with a trailer hitch. The city of Miami would purchase ten of these units at a cost of about $50,000 each, plus additional trailer hitches for police vehicles. Municipalities Miami Property Maintenance Division Upgrades Funding Secured ,Other PDM Identified Funding Source 160,000.00 70 Unknown Property Maintenance Division 105-kilowatt emergency generator project that encompasses the following: Purchase and installation of a new 105 KW stand-by generator, transfer switch, and electrical upgrades to bring the building up to code (the Florida Building Code), to provide electricity for the city's Property Maintenance Division building in case of catastrophic electrical failure. The building is the operations base fir trade personnel that provide services throughout the city for other departments. The installation includes all required improvements necessary to meet current codes. There is no existing generator at this location. Municipalities Miami Protect Vital City Records Funding Secured All Hazards FMA Identified Funding Source 60,000.00 85 Unknown This project is a study to investigate ways to best preserve the city's vital records and other documents having archival or historical value. The city has been storing approximately 1,300 boxes of records in the basement of the Miami city hall, an area that is subject to flooding during a major storm. More than 700 boxes already have been moved to temporary storage in the Coconut Grove Convention Center, but approximately 600 boxes still need to be moved. All of the boxes need to be inventoried for vital records (i.e., those related to business continuity), records of historical or archival value, and inactive records. The city already has identified an outside contractor to provide storage for inactive records that can be disposed of once a required holding time has been met. The city estimates that approximately two to three percent of the existing records will need to be retained in a controlled environment where temperature and humidity are monitored and where security of the documents can be assured. The proposed study would identify the number of current and future records that need to be protected in an environmentally controlled area, alternatives for providing the needed storage, and the estimated cost. 61 of 93 227 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Miami Public Education and Information Distribution Future Unfunded Project All Hazards PDM Identified Funding Source 650,000.00 78 Unknown The city recognizes the need to educate the public about the threat of natural and man-made disasters and proposes a multifaceted program to educate its residents about disaster preparedness and response. These actions would have a direct impact of the health and safety of Miami's residents: Literature consisting of handouts, mailers, advisory notices, booklets, etc. that would be distributed widely to city residents. Public Meetings these meetings would provide residents with an opportunity to learn more about resources available at the city and to learn about other 97 neighborhood-based city programs (e.g., Community Emergency Response Teams, NET Centers). Web Site the city would develop a web site to provide disaster-related information to residents. The site would help people prepare for disasters, and could provide a vital source of information to people about storm alerts, evacuation routes, shelters, etc. The site would be integrated with the web site already being developed by the police department for community policing and other internal record management purposes. Cable Television. The city would provide information through its cable access channel (Channel 9) during disasters. Municipalities Miami Public Works Maintenance Yard Building Future Unfunded Project ,Other PDM Identified Funding Source 8,000,000.00 85 Unknown Currently, vital tools (i.e. chain saws, cutters, etc.) and personnel are housed in portable trailers. During an emergency situation, these trailers are not being used for obvious safety reason. As a result, the department's first-response crews wait at home until the emergency situation is lifted. A hurricane-proof facility would allow Public Works to have the crews available on board right after an emergency condition. Municipalities Miami Radios for Solid Waste Future Unfunded Project ,Technological Disruption PDM Identified Funding Source 0.00 77 2/28/2014 Unknown 150 Radios for use by Solid Waste. These radios would be able to utilize police/fire towers. The radios would be used by Solid Waste to communicate post disaster during emergency protective measures. Municipalities Miami Range Resistant Park Impact Resistant Windows and Doors Installation Future Unfunded Project ,Wind,Security Breach HMGP Identified Funding Source 95,000.00 55 11/30/2017 4 months "Replace all windows and doors at park facilities with Impact Resistant Glass. Installation will prevent damage in future storm conditions.10 single doors, 5 windows, 4 double door, 1 rolling door " Municipalities Miami Reid Acres Storm Sewers Project Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge PDM Identified Funding Source 4,300,000.00 74 Unknown This project will provide a positive drainage system to the area bounded by NE 71st Street, FEC Railroad, NE 62 Street and NE 2nd Avenue. Bore and jack construction under the FEC Railroad at NE 71 Street will be required. The positive outfall line will be constructed on NE 5th Avenue to the Little River Canal. Road improvements include milling and resurfacing, new or repair sidewalks, curb and gutter, ADA ramps, re-grade or re-sodding swale areas, repair or replace damaged or disfigured traffic signs, and tree planting Municipalities Miami Removable deck grating/storage system at Dinner Key Marina Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 2,500,000.00 59 11/30/2017 6 months This project aims at providing City Marinas an alternative solution to protecting its deck grating systems which would significantly reduce replacement costs (est. $450 per grating) in the event of a major storm. This item is a main component of Dinner Key’s dock/pier structures as provides for an accessible walkway. In addition, such grating may protect foreign debris from compromising dock/pier infrastructure components (wiring, water-line, fire-line, wastewater pipes). Having a removable or easily recoverable deck grating system at this marina is crucial to the safe accessibility of marina slips and dock spaces after a turbulent storm (one which specifically includes a storm surge). During Hurricane Irma, 3-5ft storm surge displaced and sank well over 150 pieces of deck grating, 50+ which have been reported missing. Consequently, an innovative solution would be required to specifically address the loss of assets (individual deck grating) related to undesirable buoyancy exerted by the rapid rise of water. The successful realization of such a project addresses 3 hazards (life-safety, environmental, and damage to property/structures). Dinner Key Marina resides near a residential area/commercial area (Coconut Grove area), one which maintains a high volume of restaurants, attractions, and related foot-traffic. Given its location and design, the marina itself has multiple access points (including linkages to public walkways) which are difficult to control once the site has been compromised by a disaster. This increases risk associated of physical injury to local residents/marina patrons attempting to traverse the pathways and docks. Further, deck grating thrown into the sea floor can potentially damage the subaquatic ecosystem and threaten boaters in the surrounding areas. The successful completion of such improvements will reduce the time it will take the marine facility to continue its essential services after a disaster, further reducing risk to private property (such as sunken/disabled vessels) and the associated hazards. For example, if customers cannot reach their boats for service or removal, these vessels may become derelict. The speed at which this marina recovers from a storm effects multiple factors: resiliency of City assets, service to customers, recovery of local business and leisure activities, marina revenues (City), recovery of private property, control/access to nearby waterways, risk of environmental contamination, and overall public safety. Protecting such assets can prevent well-over $150,000 of property damages and potentially avoid tens of thousands more in recovery/ debris clean-up work. Given the above described, such a project would take less than a year to complete as it involves procurement of deck grating, related hardware, and installation. Municipalities Miami Replace and Improve City-owned Seawalls Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge PDM Identified Funding Source 15,000,000.00 86 Unknown This project would improve or replace, as necessary, seawalls located at fifteen city owned parks and other properties along Biscayne Bay and the Miami River. These seawalls are currently in fair to poor condition. Failure of the seawalls would result in the loss of city property, increased risk to nearby structures, and an increase in safety hazards. All of the affected seawalls are made of concrete. The specific design of seawalls to be replaced has not yet been determined, although it is likely that boulders and riprap would be included to serve as wave baffles. The areas in greatest need of repair and improvement are the seawalls at Antonio Maceo Park, Legion Park, Lummus Park, Baywood Park, and Pallot Park. In addition to the city parks, two other areas owned by the city of Miami contain concrete seawalls that either are failing or are in poor condition. These locations are on the north side of the Florida East Coast (FEC) Railroad boat slip and the Bicentennial Center. In conjunction with the proposed seawall replacement and improvements, two city-owned boat ramps (at the Watson Island Marina and the Seminole boat ramp in Coconut Grove) need to be improved to allow faster removal of boats in the event of a major storm. In addition, the Stadium Marina needs docks that would serve as a staging area while boats wait their turn to be removed from the water. Both to these actions would reduce the amount of damage not only to the boats left in the water, but also to city-owned structures and private property that could result from boats being blown inland. 62 of 93 228 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Miami Restoration of Native Species Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge PDM Identified Funding Source 75,000.00 78 Unknown At Virginia Key, a portion of the scope of work in a Coastal Partnership Initiative proposal will include natural erosion prevention/mitigation by replacing exotics with native species along the mangrove hammock area. These native species have root systems that stabilized the soil in the uplands and contribute reducing beach erosion. The project includes other elements not related to LMS but at least $75,000 in hard-costs as well as volunteer time will be allocated to exotic removal. Municipalities Miami Rockerman Canal Dredging and Stabilization Future Unfunded Project All Hazards PDM Identified Funding Source 900,000.00 64 Unknown Located in the City of Miami's Coconut Grove area, the canal serves as a channel to allow the public boat access into Biscayne Bay. The goal is to improve navigable waters for boats traveling within the canal. The scope of work includes and is not limited to canal dredging, trimming of mangrove and other exotic trees, shoreline stabilization and possible planting and/or relocating mangrove trees. Municipalities Miami Sand replacement/nourishment, revetment of Dinner Key Spoil Island, Virginia Key Beach, Watson Island (Jungle Island, Seaplane/Heliport, etc) Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 3,750,000.00 77 11/30/2017 6 months This project is a study of measures that could be used to protect the shoreline / seawalls and marine facilities at the following locations (Watson Island, Dinner Key Spoil Islands, Virginia Key Beach). This study aims at reducing vulnerability to our environment and waterways by offering a plan to reinforce the local mitigation strategy for submerged lands/waterfront property. The ideal study would place heavy emphasis on environmental preservation, natural disasters, and water management. Such a study would consider the damages/threats faced during the declared emergency, related vulnerabilities, future threats, and how they may be reduced with shoreline/submerged structures and devices. In addition, this study would also evaluate the effects/benefits of such constructions in decelerating the effects of sea-level rise. Thus, a critical goal of this project is to present/establish an ecologically sound plan to protect our submerged lands/waterfront property from eventual erosion and flood related damage. The resulting project would inevitably aid the rapid recovery of these areas after a major storm. Such advantage would directly benefit local residents who enjoy the natural habitat and/or attractions this space provides, as well as its local businesses. Given the attractions/businesses/utility of such areas, such a project can potentially benefit over 50,000 people. Given the above described, such a project would take 6 months to 2 years to complete as it may involve a series of ecological, engineering, and vulnerability studies. Such a project is estimated to cost between $100,000 - $500,000. The complexity of the eventual implementation of the project goal is highly dependent on the results of the comprehensive study, related permits, and public vote/hearings. Municipalities Miami SE 3 Street Straddle Bent Replacement Other ,Flood PDM Identified Funding Source 3,000,000.00 66 Unknown The City plans to reconstruct and widen SE 3 Street from SE 3 Avenue to Biscayne Boulevard by providing one additional lane on the south side of SE 3 Street. There is a Metromover elevated guideway located above SE 3 Street at this location typically supported by single columns with a hammerhead pier cap supporting both guideway tracks. Along this stretch of roadway, these columns are located between the two eastbound lanes. However, there is an existing straddle bent pier (P192) located on the south side of SE 3 Street which conflicts with the additional lane. The City is proposing to replace the existing straddle bent with a single column hammerhead pier similar to those utilized to support the elevated guideway, The City of Miami is seeking funding to replace the pier with appropriate structural infrastructure to allow for the street widening and for drainage improvements. Municipalities Miami SE 3rd Street Road Improvements Future Unfunded Project ,Other PDM Identified Funding Source 1,800,000.00 75 Unknown This project will improve mobility and accessibility between the Interstate Highway System (I-95) and the core Downtown Central Business District (CBD) particularly during Brickell Bridge openings to marine traffic via a two-way conversion of SE 3rd Street and SE 3rd Avenue. The project involves the coordination and corporation from stakeholders to widen and redirect traffic circulation along SE 3rd Street in downtown Miami. Road widening activities include but not limited to reconstruction, sidewalk installation, pavement striping, traffic study and signalization, coordination between stakeholders, Florida Department of Transportation and Miami-Dade County. Municipalities Miami Securing the City of Miami GSA Property Maintenance Facility Future Unfunded Project ,Other PDM Identified Funding Source 16,000.00 64 Unknown The City of Miami General Services Administration (GSA) property maintenance building has a warehouse and storage facility that houses building materials, supplies, trucks, and equipment to maintain, repair, and remodel city facilities. Building trade shops, administrative offices, and emergency response supplies and equipment are also located within this facility. This facility needs to be secured from unauthorized vehicle entries. The existing entrance gate does not allow restricting of unauthorized vehicle entry. Either a motorized sliding gate or a traffic arm gate along with remote operation for authorized vehicles and an automated system to allow authorized business visitor vehicle entry (deliveries, shipments, etc.) needs to be installed to secure this facility and restrict unauthorized entries. Municipalities Miami Shenandoah building needs elevated generator (food distribution site) Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Pow er Failure,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 175,000.00 81 11/30/2017 3 months Installation of a generator to allow facility to open immediately after a disaster in order to provide public support services such as food distribution, child care, donation collection etc. Municipalities Miami Silver Bluff Drainage Improvements Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge FMA Identified Funding Source 2,000,000.00 77 Unknown This project will provide drainage improvements for the area bordered by US-1, SW 22nd Street, SW 16th Avenue and SW 27th Avenue. The new drainage facilities will include but may not be limited to a combination of exfiltration drains, deep drainage wells, and storm water pump station(s). Road improvements include milling and resurfacing, reconstruction, new or repair sidewalks, curb and gutter, ADA ramps, re-grade or re-sodding swale areas, repair or replace damaged or disfigured traffic signs, and tree plantings. Municipalities Miami Simpson Park Impact Resistant Windows and Doors Installation Future Unfunded Project ,Wind,Security Breach HMGP Identified Funding Source 102,000.00 54 11/30/2017 4 months "Replace all windows and doors at park facilities with Impact Resistant Glass. Installation will prevent damage in future storm conditions.• 5 sliding doors • 4 windows in the kitchen • 1 door in the kitchen • 2 windows in the bathrooms • 2 windows in the main office • 1 window in the storeroom • 5 windows in the front • 2 doors in the front " 63 of 93 229 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Miami South Bayshore Drive Road Improvements Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge FMA Identified Funding Source 4,000,000.00 66 Unknown Located between the limits of Darwin Street and Mercy Way, improvement works along South Bayshore Drive include the construction of drainage facilities consisting of a combination but not limited to exfiltration trenches (French drains), deep drainage wells, pump stations, storm sewer pipes for gravity conveyance, baffles, manholes, catch basins, cross drains, swale trenches, re-grading and re-sodding swale areas. Road improvements include and not limited to roadway milling and resurfacing, ADA ramps, bike and walkway lanes, repair damaged sidewalks, curb and/or gutter, replacement of damaged or disfigured traffic signs and tree planting. Municipalities Miami Southside Park Impact Resistant Windows and Doors Installation Future Unfunded Project ,Wind,Security Breach HMGP Identified Funding Source 50,000.00 55 11/30/2017 4 months Replace all windows and doors at park facilities with Impact Resistant Glass. Installation will prevent damage in future storm conditions. Municipalities Miami Station/Facility Apparatus Room Doors Funding Secured All Hazards PDM Identified Funding Source 252,000.00 81 Unknown The city of Miami has an approximately 72 apparatus room overhead rolling doors that are prone to failure and should be replaced with a more secure door. These doors are the main egress for Fire-Rescue vehicles and they protect emergency equipment worth at least $2,000,000 per facility. Municipalities Miami Storage Facilities for Critical Equipment Future Unfunded Project All Hazards PDM Identified Funding Source 0.00 75 Unknown Currently, the city of Miami has a severe shortage of hardened storage locations for city equipment during a major disaster. Equipment such as the fire department's urban search and rescue trailers, Public Works' heavy equipment, parks department buses, and other similar items are stored outside on a normal day-to-day basis and could be damaged and destroyed during a storm. Much of this equipment is vital during a disaster to serve functions such as rescuing trapped citizens, clearing roadways, and providing support to other disaster recovery operations. The city of Miami has identified a need for three hardened facilities, located in three different areas of the city that would allow for the proper protection of this equipment and allow for the rapid deployment following a disaster. The facility would need to meet, and in most cases exceed current construction and protective equipment requirements and have emergency power and communications equipment for workers at these facilities. Municipalities Miami Storm Shelter for Families of City Employees Future Unfunded Project All Hazards PDM Identified Funding Source 750,000.00 86 Unknown During a disaster, the separation stress of employees being away from their families and loved ones is a critical issue that adversely affects the city's ability to respond during a disaster. Employees' job performance may suffer because of this concern and some employees may elect to remain with their families instead of responding to city needs. One way to solve this problem is to create a shelter specifically dedicated to city personnel and their families. This would help assure the city's emergency workers that their families will be safe during a disaster and allow them to concentrate on providing essential services. As part of this project, the city would conduct a study to determine the best location for such a shelter, whether one large shelter or multiple smaller shelters should be constructed, if there is an existing facility (or multiple facilities) that could meet these requirements, and estimated costs. Resources and services needed include safety and security, medical care, food and lodging, and communications. The study also would examine the effect of these new, dedicated shelters on the larger shelter deficit that exists throughout Miami-Dade County. Municipalities Miami Storm Shutters for City Buildings Future Unfunded Project ,Wind PDM Identified Funding Source 0.00 90 Unknown This project would install hurricane shutters and reinforced doors on the manifold municipal buildings without this protection. These shutters and doors are designed to prevent hurricane force winds and debris from breaking the windows and allowing wind, water, and debris to enter the structures. These proposed modifications would allow these buildings to not only survive the hurricane with less damage to the structure and the property stored inside, but also reduce the financial impact to the city. From a purely practical standpoint, the hurricane shutters and doors also would allow the buildings to remain functional during a storm and help ensure that they could be used immediately afterwards in the response and recovery phase. The city of Miami has a critical need to protect the following facilities: Athletic Club building � used as a city employee deployment center. Convention Center. 26 park buildings & structures located throughout the city. Municipalities Miami Street Sweeping Program Improvement Future Unfunded Project All Hazards PDM Identified Funding Source 900,000.00 76 Unknown The city currently has minimal staff and equipment assigned to sweep streets so as to minimize blockage of storm drains. This project includes the acquisition of five additional pieces of equipment, one year of equipment maintenance, tipping fees and the hiring of equipment operators. Street sweeping program would be conducted citywide on a systematic, programmed basis. Municipalities Miami Structural Upgrades to Pilings and Rigging Systems at DKM & Mooring Field Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Power Failure,Sea Level Rise,Security Breach,Storm Surge,Technologic al Disruption,Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 4,250,000.00 67 11/30/2017 6 months This is project consists of comprehensive feasibility study and the implementation of measures to fortify Dinner Key Marina and Mooring Field to better withstand tropical storm and hurricane related damages. The work would involve an engineering/environmental study and construction of strengthened marine structures (marina docks, piers, and pilings.) Such work would aim at increasing the life-span of main marina structure for 20-39 years, possibly more. This item is a critical counterpart to the proposed mitigation of Dinner Key Marina’s electrical/plumbing system, hence it directly implies similar benefits/risk reduction characteristics. The Dinner Key Marina faces the South-Eastern Caribbean and is vulnerable to churning storm surge that enters between Key Biscayne and Elliot Key from the Atlantic. During Hurricane Irma, Dinner Key Marina experienced damage from 3 to 5 foot storm surge. Such damage included: direct water damage (flood), physical damage, and debris. The storm surge exerted undesirable buoyancy (upward pressure) to the marina’s dock/pier infrastructure and related components. In addition, the storm surge smashed vessels into the docks/pier structures; breaking pilings, pipes, electrical pedestals, conduits, and releasing debris into Biscayne Bay. This upgrade addresses the protection from 3 hazards (life-safety, environmental, and property/structure damage). Dinner Key Marina resides near a residential/commercial areas (specifically, the Coconut Grove area), which maintain a high volume of restaurants, attractions, and related foot-traffic. Given its location and design, the marina site has multiple access points (including direct linkages to public walkways) which become difficult to control once the site has been compromised by a disaster. This increases risk of physical injury to local residents/marina patrons attempting to traverse the pathways and docks. The successful completion of such improvements will reduce the time it will take the marine facility to continue its essential services after a disaster, further reducing risk to private property (such as sunken/disabled vessels) and associated hazards. The speed at which this marina recovers from a storm influences multiple factors, such as: resiliency of City assets, service to live-aboard customers, recovery of local business and leisure activities, marina revenues (City), recovery of private property, control/access to nearby waterways, and overall public safety. Given the above described, such a project would likely take 1 to 2 years to complete as it involves complex work and design. However, the project would positively impact the welfare and resiliency of the local community and marina visitors (more than 10,000 people). 64 of 93 230 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Miami Study to Reduce Erosion on Virginia Key Beach Funding Secured All Hazards PDM Identified Funding Source 75,000.00 84 Unknown This project is a study of measures that could be used to protect the beach and reduce the loss of sand from Virginia Key Beach. The city of Miami owns approximately 42 acres of ocean front beach on Virginia Key, approximately one mile long. The beach area is currently part of a beach improvement plan that will include importing sand to the area. The city recognizes that offshore groins (corrugated steel piles driven into the ocean floor) have been used in other areas with only limited success. The city is seeking a solution that will help reduce sand loss while allowing for maximum public enjoyment of the beach. Municipalities Miami Update Stormwater Master Plan Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge HMGP/Other 2,000,000.00 88 11/21/2016 2 years Update the City of Miami's Stormwater Master Plan to account for Sea Level Rise Municipalities Miami Vehicle Tracking Devices Future Unfunded Project All Hazards PDM Identified Funding Source 250,000.00 83 Unknown During emergency situations, it is very difficult to efficiently track Public Works equipment and direct their operators to the disaster area most in need. As a result, some disaster areas are not being addressed in a timely manner. A solution to these deficiencies will be to install vehicle tracking devices which will relay their position to the emergency operations center. This would allow the more timely and efficient dispatch of equipment. Municipalities Miami Virginia Key Beach storm water management Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 15,096,495.00 50 11/30/2017 1+ years Study and implementation of options approved by DERM and code to protect the shoreline and beach areas. Prevent beach erosion and allow preparing area for storm surge and flood control. Municipalities Miami Watson Island Baywalk Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge PDM Identified Funding Source 300,000.00 71 Unknown The Watson Island Shoreline Stabilization Project, located on the southeastern section of Watson Island will stabilize a 500-foot section of the Biscayne Bay shoreline along the southeastern shoreline of Watson Island. The project will entail installation of rip- rap along this shoreline and construction of a seawall to stabilize and contain erosion to this shoreline, along a proposed bay- walk which will run parallel to this seawall. Complementary public access features will be constructed and installed to enhance this waterfront area. Municipalities Miami Beach 48" Outfall at Easement 4180-4200 Chase Avenue Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge,Flood,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge Unknown Grant Applied For 200,000.00 80 > 1 year 48” Outfall at Easement 4180–4200 Chase Avenue: Improvements include building a new 48" outfall and installing approximately 450 linear feet of 48" HDPE pipe, one manhole, and one catch basin. When completed, this project will produce a stormwater system capable of providing a high level of service in the area. Status: This is a future project. Municipalities Miami Beach Acquisition of Emergency Generators Funding Applied for Wind,Flood,Flood /Storm Surge,Power Failure,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Technologic al Disruption Unknown Grant Applied For 5,600,000.00 88 1/23/2014 December 2019 Acquisition of Emergency Generators: Acquisition of emergency generators to ensure continued operation of critical city facilities/systems and the appropriate levels of service for city residents during and after a disaster event. This project is particularly important in providing backup power to pump stations that mitigate flooding throughout the city. Status: This project is ongoing. Municipalities Miami Beach Area-wide Mitigation Plan Future Unfunded Project multiple Future grant funding. 10,000,000.00 96 11/7/2016 December 2020 Area-wide mitigation plan: The City of Miami Beach has significant exposure to numerous natural hazards that have caused millions of dollars in past damage. Limited local resources make it difficult to be pre-emptive in risk reduction initiatives. Being able to leverage financial assistance is paramount to successful hazard mitigation in the area. This project includes drainage and neighborhood storm water infrastructure improvements. Municipalities Miami Beach Bayshore Neighborhood Improvements Project in Planning Stage Flood, Storm Surge,Health,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge Unknown Grant Applied For 0.00 85 10/23/2015 > 1 year The purpose of the project improvements is to provide a higher level of service defined by flood protection and control of pollutant loading in the stormwater system. The improvements consist of one or a combination of the following: 1) Repair, replace, and/or install curbs and gutters, 2) Reconstruct and/or raise streets and sidewalks, 3) Repair, replace, and/or install collection systems, catch basins and manholes, 4) Construct water quality treatment devices, and 5) Construct pump stations, controls and force mains. This project is now under the Low North Bay Road - Neighborhood Improvements project. Municipalities Miami Beach Belle Island – New Pump Station and Existing Pump Station Conversion Future Unfunded Project Flood,Storm Surge,Health,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge Unknown Grant Applied For 0.00 85 10/23/2015 > 1 year Belle Island – New Pump Station and Existing Pump Station Conversion: The purpose of the project improvements is to provide a higher level of service defined by flood protection and control of pollutant loading in the stormwater system, and reduce reliance on gravity or pressurized drainage (injection) wells. The improvements consist of one or a combination of the following: 1) Construct additional stormwater collection system piping to interconnect existing pipe networks, 2) Construct water quality treatment devices, 3) Construct pumping stations, controls and force mains, 4) Convert existing pumping stations discharge piping from injection wells and add force mains to new outfall, and 5) Construct new outfall and/or upgrade existing outfall pipes and seawalls (inclusive of tidal backflow prevention devices). Status: This is a future project. Municipalities Miami Beach Biscayne Point – Neighborhood Improvements Project in Planning Stage Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge Unknown Grant Applied For 0.00 85 10/21/2015 > 1 year Biscayne Pointe – Neighborhood Improvements: The purpose of the project improvements is to provide a higher level of service defined by flood protection and control of pollutant loading in the stormwater system. The improvements consist of one or a combination of the following: 1) Repair, replace, and/or install curbs and gutters, 2) Reconstruct and/or raise streets and sidewalks, 3) Repair, replace, and/or install collection systems, catch basins and manholes, 4) Construct water quality treatment devices, 5) Construct pump stations, controls and force mains, 6) Convert existing pumping stations discharge piping from injection wells and add force mains to new outfall, and 7) Repair or upgrade existing outfall pipes and seawalls (inclusive of tidal backflow prevention devices). Status: This is a future project. Municipalities Miami Beach Business Infrastructure Improvements to Mitigate Flood Risks Future Unfunded Project Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge TBD Grant Applied For 0.00 75 11/7/2016 December 2018 The City of Miami Beach continues to face critically dangerous conditions due to climate change and consistent coastal and rainfall flooding. This project includes a request for funding for infrastructure improvements and business resilience funding to combat the damage caused by these conditions and mitigate further damage in the Sunset Harbor neighborhood and other affected neighborhoods throughout the City. 65 of 93 231 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Miami Beach Central Bayshore – Neighborhood Improvements (34th Street South) Construction/Project Begun Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge Unknown Grant Applied For 0.00 85 10/23/2015 > 1 year Central Bayshore – Neighborhood Improvements (34th Street South): The purpose of the project improvements is to provide a higher level of service defined by flood protection and control of pollutant loading in the stormwater system. The improvements consist of one or a combination of the following: 1) Repair, replace, and/or install curbs and gutters, 2) Reconstruct and/or raise streets and sidewalks, 3) Repair, replace, and/or install collection systems, catch basins and manholes, 4) Construct water quality treatment devices, and 5) Construct pump stations, controls and force mains. Status: This project is under construction. Municipalities Miami Beach City Center – Neighborhood Improvements Project in Planning Stage Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge Unknown Grant Applied For 0.00 85 10/21/2015 > 1 year City Center – Neighborhood Improvements: The purpose to provide a higher level of service defined by flood protection and control of pollutant loading in the stormwater system. The improvements consist of the construction of two pump stations to serve the Convention Center and portions of the neighborhood. Status: The pump station at Washington Avenue is under construction. The pump station for 19th Street is in the procurement process. Additional stormwater system improvements along Washington Avenue, 17th Street and Convention Center Drive are in the design phase. Municipalities Miami Beach City off-island Logistic Response Center Future Unfunded Project ,Health,Power Failure,Security Breach,Technologi cal Disruption,Flood,F lood/Storm Surge,Storm Surge,Wind,Sea Level Rise Potential grant funds. 2,700,000.00 85 11/30/2017 December 2019 The City off-island Logistical Response Center will be for use in maintaining adequate facility and resources (Emergency Operations and 1-2 days of essential supplies/commodities) in support of the City’s expeditious recovery from a catastrophic event. As a barrier island this remote location would provide an operational platform for all essential City functions should the island become uninhabitable. Municipalities Miami Beach Citywide Dune Restoration & Enhancement Project Construction/Project Begun Flood/Storm Surge,Flood,Storm Surge Unknown Grant Applied For 400,000.00 85 > 1 year Citywide Dune Restoration & Enhancement Project: This project seeks to restore the City’s coastal dune system by removing non- native vegetation, planting native species, and selectively trimming native vegetation. This project will improve the overall health and stability of the dune system so it is best suited to retain sand and protect upland structures from storm surge and flooding. The project will also install a rope and post fence system around the dune system to protect the project’s results and minimize trampling impacts to the protected area. Educational signage will educate visitors about the structure of the dunes, their importance, and the vegetation housed therein. Status: On-going (maintenance and monitoring). Municipalities Miami Beach Citywide Home Elevations Future Unfunded Project Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge Unknown Grant Applied For 0.00 68 10/21/2015 > 1 year Citywide Home Elevations: The project will assist eligible homeowners to elevate their properties in order to mitigate flooding. The project will also encourage homeowners to become more resilient and to incorporate climate change considerations in their home improvement projects. It will also promote the inclusion of mitigation strategies that foster community resilience against flooding risks. Status: This is a future project. Municipalities Miami Beach Citywide Tidal Flooding Mitigation Phase 1 Project in Planning Stage Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge Unknown Grant Applied For 0.00 92 10/23/2015 > 1 year Citywide Tidal Flooding Mitigation: The purpose of the project improvements is to prevent the backflow of water from the Biscayne Bay into the City’s stormwater management system and up through the stormwater inlet grates flooding the roadway curb and gutter. This tidal flooding poses a threat to public health and safety, inconveniences the public, and has caused major damage to structures, and killed lawns and landscaping. In addition, tidal flooding saturates the base structure of roadways causing failure of roadways prior to their expected useful design life. This project consists of the installation of backflow prevention valves (aka “Tideflex” valves) on a majority of the PSMS outfalls to the Biscayne Bay and in the lowest lying areas of the City. Status: This project is under construction. Municipalities Miami Beach Citywide Undergrounding of Utilities Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Pow er Failure,Sea Level Rise,Security Breach,Storm Surge,Technologic al Disruption,Wind Future grant funding. 10,000,000.00 83 11/30/2017 2020 Relocation of power lines underground to protect human life during extreme weather event. This project includes hospitals, police, fire, EOC, residential, and business operations. Municipalities Miami Beach Citywide Wastewater Infrastructure Improvements Construction/Project Begun Health Unknown Grant Applied For 2,250,000.00 76 > 1 year Citywide Wastewater Infrastructure Improvements: The wastewater lines are approximately 50-80 years old. The iron pipes are increasingly brittle, resulting in hydraulic problems and potential failures. The useful life of these force mains is approximately 50 years and the pipes are either at the end of or beyond their useful life. This project will implement the city’s Wastewater System Master Plan, which will replace aging lines that are 60 years old or more. Status: This is an ongoing project. 66 of 93 232 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Miami Beach Citywide Water Infrastructure Improvements Construction/Project Begun Health Unknown Grant Applied For 55,000,000.00 77 > 1 year Citywide Water Infrastructure Improvements: The project includes the replacement of aging water lines (60+ years old). These iron pipes are significantly tuberculated which has resulted in diminished water quality and hydraulic problems. This project is fully programmed through neighborhood projects and other projects in the City’s 5-year Capital Improvement Plan, subject to appropriation of additional programmed funding. Status: This is an ongoing project. Municipalities Miami Beach Cultural and Historical Resources Hazard Mitigation Plan Funding Secured Flood,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Wind FEMA and City of Miami Beach Grant Applied For 0.00 93 11/7/2016 August 2019 Plan includes a vulnerability assessment and mitigation strategies for the protection of cultural and historical resources located within the City's Local Historic Districts. Municipalities Miami Beach Data Integration System Future Unfunded Project ,Technological Disruption,Flood,F lood/Storm Surge,Power Failure,Sea Level Rise,Security Breach,Storm Surge,Wind Potential grant funding. 1,000,000.00 86 11/30/2017 2019 The data integration project will use analytics to predict climate change related weather and environmental events. Municipalities Miami Beach Drainage Hot Spots Construction/Project Begun Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge Unknown Grant Applied For 0.00 85 10/23/2015 > 1 year Stormwater Outfall and Seawall Reconstruction: Replacement of seawalls and 150 stormwater outfalls with associated relining of piping leading to outfalls in areas that have three properties with repetitive flood claims. Project will also include a pollution control device and possible demolition of existing seawalls, repair of seawalls, and relocation of riprap. Status: Seawalls are under construction along Dade Boulevard/Collins Canal. Additional seawalls on the priority list are in the design and bidding phase of construction. Municipalities Miami Beach Extensive Repairs to Seawalls & Creation of Living Shoreline Construction/Project Begun Flood/Storm Surge,Flood,Storm Surge,Sea Level Rise,Wind Grant funds needed to supplement City funds allocated to this project. 3,787,000.00 89 December 2019 Approximately twenty-five (25) seawalls in Miami Beach are in need extensive repairs and the creation of a living seawall is needed. Funding and completion of these seawalls would mitigate the damage to the inland shoreline located throughout the city. The seawalls provide the armor protection from the effects of tidal and wave action along the waterways. Present conditions will lead to erosion of the banks and eventual loss of property into the canals. The loss of property into the canals contributes to flooding due the reduction in canal depth. In order to be in compliance with environmental concerns, seawall & bulkhead repairs will require a Miami-Dade DERM permit, which typically requires a hydrographic survey to determine any possible impacts to the adjacent waterway ecosystems, particularly seagrass. Seawall & Bulkhead construction equipment and/or work may damage adjacent ecosystems. Any damage to riprap or seagrass will require mitigation work to be determined by DERM in advance of the project. Mitigation work may include placement of riprap at a new location. A State FDEP and Army Corps of Engineers permit will also be required. Any damage to riprap or seagrass will require mitigation work. Including, but not limited to the following projects: Muss Park--Fill cavities at East and West ends. Seal crack--$674,000 Henedon Avenue--Seal the wall and remove banyan tree--$30,000 Rue Notre Dame--Seal all cracks, replace top of seawall--$45,000 Bay Road--Replace the cap. Replace the guardrail--$275,000 10th St Streetend--Repair the seawall--$945,000 Lincoln Court--Repair the seawall--$548,000 Municipalities Miami Beach Flamingo Park 6th Street (5th / 7th Streets) – Neighborhood Improvements Project in Planning Stage Flood/Storm Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Flood Unknown Grant Applied For 70,000,000.00 85 > 1 year Flamingo Park (5th to 7th Streets) – Neighborhood Improvements: The purpose is to provide a higher level of service defined by flood protection and control of pollutant loading in the stormwater system. The improvements consist of one or a combination of the following: 1) Repair, replace, and/or install curbs and gutters, 2) Reconstruct and/or raise streets and sidewalks, 3) Repair, replace, and/or install collection systems, catch basins and manholes, 4) Construct water quality treatment devices, 5) Construct pump stations, controls and force mains, and 6) Repair or upgrade existing outfall pipes and seawalls (inclusive of tidal backflow prevention devices). Status: This is a future project to be combined with the Flamingo Park Neighborhood project. Municipalities Miami Beach Flood Proofing Sewer and Pump Stations Construction/Project Begun Flood/Storm Surge,Flood,Storm Surge Unknown Grant Applied For 2,340,000.00 89 October 2016 Flood Proofing Sewer and Pump Stations: Relining and sealing 31 pump stations and 500 manholes throughout the city to prevent water intrusion—which would damage pump station equipment/structures—and failure of stations, thereby avoiding flooding. In the past, five pump stations have failed during storms and resulted in flooding. Status: Construction is ongoing. Municipalities Miami Beach Hardening of Affordable Housing Building (Neptune) Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Wind Potential grant funding. 1,000,000.00 61 11/30/2017 December 2018 The Neptune is an affordable housing building in need of hardening and wind retrofit. All residents are low-income, meeting the US HUD 80% AMI criteria. Municipalities Miami Beach Hardening of Affordable Housing complex (MADELEINE VILLAGE) Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Wind Potential grant funds 1,000,000.00 61 11/30/2017 December 2018 Madeleine Village is a four building, 35 unit, historic affordable housing complex. All residents are low-income, meeting the US HUD 80% AMI criteria. All four structures are in need of hardening and wind retrofit. Municipalities Miami Beach Hardening of Carl Fisher Clubhouse Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Wind,Storm Surge Potential grant funding 1,000,000.00 56 11/30/2017 2019 This building is in need of hardening and wind retrofitting. 67 of 93 233 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Miami Beach Hardening of City Buildings (555 17th St.) Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Wind Unknown 500,000.00 74 11/28/2017 December 2018 The City owned building at 555 17th Street requires protection from wind, flooding, and storm surge during a significant weather event. No updates to the building have been made and as an older building it is extremely vulnerable to loss. Municipalities Miami Beach Hardening of City Buildings (Bass Museum) Project in Planning Stage ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Wind Unknown 500,000.00 69 11/28/2017 December 2018 The Bass Museum is extremely vulnerable to flooding, storm surge, and high winds due to its proximity to the Atlantic Ocean. Flooding took place during the most recent disaster event. The Museum contains invaluable works of art of cultural significance which should be protected from storm damage. Municipalities Miami Beach Hardening of City owned recreation building at 999 11th Street Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Wind Funding for this project is currently unsecured. 0.00 0 06/05/2018 2020 Building is in need of hardening and wind retrofitting to include new roof and possible window upgrades. There are two not-for- profit community organizations housed in this building: The Miami Beach Police Athletic League and the Miami Beach Boys & Girls Club. Municipalities Miami Beach Hardening of Colony Theatre Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Wind Potential grant funds. 500,000.00 54 11/30/2017 2019 This building is in need of hardening and wind retrofitting. Municipalities Miami Beach Hardening of Fire Stations Future Unfunded Project Health,Other,Floo d,Flood/Storm Surge,Power Failure,Sea Level Rise,Security Breach,Storm Surge,Technologic al Disruption Potential grant funding. 5,000,000.00 88 12/8/2015 2019 Intensive hardening is required to protect the fire stations during an emergency and to continue protective loss of life and property. The City facilitated an in-depth assessment of the Fire Station, and upon evaluation of the current site conditions and minimum code requirements, full site hardening of existing structures was recommended in order to mitigate potential severe hazards and provide the public with basic services. This project includes a minimum of three fire stations. Municipalities Miami Beach Hardening of Miami City Ballet Building Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Wind Potential grant funding. 1,000,000.00 56 11/30/2017 2019 This building is in need of hardening and wind retrofitting. Municipalities Miami Beach Hardening of North Shore Youth Center Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Pow er Failure,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Wind Future grant funding. 1,000,000.00 84 11/30/2017 December 2018 During an emergency, this building serves as a base for emergency operations. Building is in need of hardening and wind retrofitting. Municipalities Miami Beach Hardening of Scott Rakow Youth Center Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Pow er Failure,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Wind Future grant funding. 1,000,000.00 89 11/30/2017 December 2018 During an extreme weather event, this building serves as a base for emergency operations. Building is in need of hardening and wind retrofitting. Municipalities Miami Beach Home Elevation Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge HMGP (Potential)1,000,000.00 0 03/22/2018 Two years (2020) Through this project, the City will work in collaboration with homeowners to elevate their homes. Miami Beach is surrounded by seas rising three times the pace of the global average and faces risk from 'sunny day' tidal flooding, flooding due to heavy rain, storm surge, and sea level rise. All homes in Miami Beach lie within flood risk zone A or B. The threat to private property brings an added risk of loss of life as many residents have a false sense of security and will wait out flooding events in their homes. To mitigate this risk, the City proposes a comprehensive home elevation program. City staff in the planning, building, and grants departments will assist homeowners through the application and construction processes and will ensure compliance with FEMA regulations. To qualify, applicants must meet the following criteria: 1. Permanent legal resident of Miami Beach 2. Homeowner for a minimum of one (1) year; must be in the name of the applicant 3. Current flood insurance policy and claim filed to address any damages 4. Home must be vulnerable to flooding Homes meeting the FEMA definition of Severe Repetitive Loss will receive prioritization and homes meeting Repetitive Loss standards will receive second tier allocation. Homes situated in a designated flood plain will receive third tier allocation. The City will propose the creation of a streamlined permitting process and the utilization of select vendor(s) to expedite construction. Homeowners will be required to provide 10% cost share and the City will seek additional funding through Community Development Block Grants and FEMA's Pre-Disaster Mitigation Grant Program. Municipalities Miami Beach Indian Creek Drive 25th to 41st Street Drainage Improvements Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge,Flood,Storm Surge FDOT and City of Miami Beach Grant Applied For 2,700,000.00 85 2018 Indian Creek Drive 25th to 41st Street Drainage Improvements: Construction consists of drainage improvements, seawall construction, a pump station as well as road raising on Indian Creek. The project includes construction of new catch basins and outfalls with associated piping. The stormwater will be treated using vortex structures and stormwater pump stations. Status: The project is in the pre-construction phase as part of a partnership with FDOT. 68 of 93 234 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Miami Beach Intelligent Transportation Systems/Emergency Communication Plan Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Pow er Failure,Sea Level Rise,Security Breach,Storm Surge,Technologic al Disruption,Wind Potential grant funding. 20,000,000.00 79 11/30/2017 2019 This project will provide for emergency communications and intelligent transit in support of evacuation efforts (i.e. hardened installations, data fusion and redundant systems capabilities). Municipalities Miami Beach La Gorce Neighborhod Drainage Project Project in Planning Stage Flood,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Flood/Stor m Surge Potential Grant Applied For 22,900,000.00 85 12/18/2013 June 2018 La Gorce Neighborhood and Allison Island Neighborhood Drainage Improvements: The purpose of this project is to provide a higher level of service defined by flood protection and control of pollutant loading in the stormwater system. The improvements consist of one or a combination of the following: 1) Repair, replace, and/or install curbs and gutters, 2) Reconstruct and/or raise streets and sidewalks, 3) Repair, replace, and/or install collection systems, catch basins and manholes, 4) Construct water quality treatment devices, 5) Construct pump stations, controls and force mains, and 6) Repair or upgrade existing outfall pipes and seawalls (inclusive of tidal backflow prevention devices). Status: A design criteria package is being developed for the selection of a design-build firm. Municipalities Miami Beach Lincoln Road Improvements (Flamingo Park – 8th Street to Lincoln Road) Project in Planning Stage Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge Unknown Grant Applied For 0.00 85 10/23/2015 > 1 year Lincoln Road Improvements (Flamingo Park – 8th Street to Lincoln Road): The purpose of the project improvements is to provide a higher level of service defined by flood protection and control of pollutant loading in the stormwater system. The improvements consist of improving surface drainage. Status: This project is in the design phase. Municipalities Miami Beach Middle North Bay Road Drainage Improvements Project in Planning Stage Flood/Storm Surge,Flood,Storm Surge,Sea Level Rise Potential Grant Applied For 5,500,000.00 85 October 2016 Middle North Bay Road Drainage Improvements: This project addresses numerous resident complaints and staff observations regarding a low stormwater service level in the neighborhood. Drainage improvements would include pump stations as well as additional drainage collection, conveyance, treatment, and disposal facilities to serve the entrance to Mt. Sinai as well as Middle North Bay Road neighborhood. Status: Phase I of the Request for Qualifications is currently underway. Municipalities Miami Beach Nautilus – Neighborhood Improvements Future Unfunded Project Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge Unknown Grant Applied For 0.00 85 10/23/2015 > 1 year Nautilus – Neighborhood Improvements: The purpose of the project improvements is to provide a higher level of service defined by flood protection and control of pollutant loading in the stormwater system. The improvements consist of one or a combination of the following: 1) Repair, replace, and/or install curbs and gutters, 2) Reconstruct and/or raise streets and sidewalks, 3) Repair, eplace, and/or install collection systems, catch basins and manholes, 4) Construct water quality treatment devices, 5) Construct pump stations, controls and force mains, 6) Convert existing pumping stations discharge piping from injection wells and add force mains to new outfall, and 7) Repair or upgrade existing outfall pipes and seawalls (inclusive of tidal backflow prevention devices). Status: This is a future project. Municipalities Miami Beach Normandy Isle South – Neighborhood Improvements Future Unfunded Project Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge Unknown Grant Applied For 0.00 85 10/23/2015 > 1 year Normandy Isle South – Neighborhood Improvements: The purpose of the project improvements is to provide a higher level of service defined by flood protection and control of pollutant loading in the stormwater system. The improvements consist of one or a combination of the following: 1) Repair, replace, and/or install curbs and gutters, 2) Reconstruct and/or raise streets and sidewalks, 3) Repair, replace, and/or install collection systems, catch basins and manholes, 4) Construct water quality treatment devices, 5) Construct pump stations, controls and force mains, and 6) Repair or upgrade existing outfall pipes and seawalls (inclusive of tidal backflow prevention devices). Status: This is a future project. Municipalities Miami Beach Normandy Shores – Neighborhood Improvements Future Unfunded Project Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge Unknown Grant Applied For 0.00 85 10/23/2015 > 1 year Normandy Shores – Neighborhood Improvements: The purpose of the project improvements is to provide a higher level of service defined by flood protection and control of pollutant loading in the stormwater system. The improvements consist of one or a combination of the following: 1) Repair, replace, and/or install curbs and gutters, 2) Reconstruct and/or raise streets and sidewalks, 3) Repair, replace, and/or install collection systems, catch basins and manholes, 4) Construct water quality treatment devices, 5) Construct pump stations, controls and force mains, and 6) Repair or upgrade existing outfall pipes and seawalls (inclusive of tidal backflow prevention devices). Status: This is a future project. Municipalities Miami Beach North Shore – Neighborhood Improvements Project in Planning Stage Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge Unknown Grant Applied For 0.00 85 10/21/2015 > 1 year City Center – Neighborhood Improvements: The purpose to provide a higher level of service defined by flood protection and control of pollutant loading in the stormwater system. The improvements consist of the construction of two pump stations to serve the Convention Center and portions of the neighborhood. Status: The pump station at Washington Avenue is under construction. The pump station for 19th Street is in the procurement process. Additional stormwater system improvements along Washington Avenue, 17th Street and Convention Center Drive are in the design phase. 69 of 93 235 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Miami Beach Palm & Hibiscus Islands – Neighborhood Improvements Construction/Project Begun Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge Unknown Grant Applied For 0.00 85 10/21/2015 > 1 year Palm & Hibiscus Islands – Neighborhood Improvements: The purpose is to provide a higher level of service defined by flood protection and control of pollutant loading in the stormwater system. The improvements consist of one or a combination of the following: 1) Repair, replace, and/or install curbs and gutters, 2) Reconstruct and/or raise streets and sidewalks, 3) Repair, replace, and/or install collection systems, catch basins and manholes, 4) Construct water quality treatment devices, 5) Construct pump stations, controls and force mains, and 6) Repair or upgrade existing outfall pipes and seawalls (inclusive of tidal backflow prevention devices). Status: This project is under construction. Municipalities Miami Beach Portable Traffic Light Signals Future Unfunded Project Power Failure Unknown Grant Applied For 160,000.00 74 > 1 year Portable Traffic Light Signals: During power outages, the traffic lights are inoperable, causing a potential hazard. Portable traffic signals will provide the safety that is needed for traffic control. The city anticipates that it will need ten portable traffic signals to adequately handle an emergency situation. Status: This is a future project. Municipalities Miami Beach Purchase of a Safeboat for Miami Beach Police Dept. Marine Patrol Construction/Project Begun Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Power Failure,Security Breach,Storm Surge,Technologic al Disruption,Wind,O ther TBD 0.00 84 11/7/2016 3 months The purchase and fitting of a Safeboat is aimed at tackling both man made and natural disasters. In particular, the design and capability of the boat will enable officers to rescue citizens on limited access islands or other boats, and in most weather and daylight conditions. In addition, it will provide the capability to tackle waterborne threats e.g. unoccupied boats that have burst their moorings during storms. Municipalities Miami Beach Regional integration of power generation Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Pow er Failure,Sea Level Rise,Security Breach,Storm Surge,Technologic al Disruption,Wind Potential grant funds 5,000,000.00 92 11/30/2017 2019 This project includes the addition of solar capabilities to street lighting and the regional integration of power generation (solar/wind/wave/generator) into the utility grid. Municipalities Miami Beach South Pointe – Neighborhood Improvements Project in Planning Stage Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge Unknown Grant Applied For 0.00 85 10/23/2015 > 1 year South Pointe – Neighborhood Improvements: The purpose of the project improvements is to provide a higher level of service defined by flood protection and control of pollutant loading in the stormwater system. The improvements consist of one or a combination of the following: 1) Repair, replace, and/or install curbs and gutters, 2) Reconstruct and/or raise streets and sidewalks, 3) Repair, replace, and/or install collection systems, catch basins and manholes, 4) Construct water quality treatment devices, 5) Construct pump stations, controls and force mains, 6) Convert existing pumping stations discharge piping from injection wells and add force mains to new outfall, and 7) Repair or upgrade existing outfall pipes and seawalls (inclusive of tidal backflow prevention devices). Status: This project is in the planning stage. Municipalities Miami Beach Star Island – New Pump Station Future Unfunded Project Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge Unknown Grant Applied For 0.00 79 10/23/2015 > 1 year Star Island – New Pump Station: The purpose of the project improvements is to provide a higher level of service defined by flood protection and control of pollutant loading in the stormwater system. The improvements consist of one or a combination of the following: 1) Construct additional stormwater collection system piping to interconnect existing pipe networks, 2) Construct water quality treatment devices, 3) Construct pumping stations, controls and force mains, and 4) Repair or upgrade existing outfall pipes and seawalls (inclusive of tidal backflow prevention devices) Status: This is a future project. Municipalities Miami Beach Storage Tank Refurbishment Project Construction/Project Begun Flood/Storm Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge TBD Grant Applied For 0.00 73 11/7/2016 Summer 2018 Repair and replace all storage tank to meet DERM compliance. This project hardens infrastructure that supports critical infrastructure sites throughout the city, including fire stations, pump stations and our public works yard. Two (2) sites in the process of construction for full replacement (i.e. Convention Center & MBFD Station #3). Remaining storage tank sites are under review reference prioritization & locating funding source. Estimated Project completion year: a. MBFD Station #3 – November 2016, b. MBCC- August 2017, c. remaining sites TBD based upon repair needs and costs. Sites requiring minor repairs have an estimated completion year of December 2016-February 2017. Overall project estimated completion year of Summer of 2018. Municipalities Miami Beach Storm Shutters and Protective Glass for City Buildings (Log Cabin) Future Unfunded Project Wind Unknown 30,000.00 55 unknown The city is a barrier island that is subject to high winds, missile hazards and significant impact damage. City buildings listed require protection for windows during a significant weather event. Municipalities Miami Beach Storm Shutters and Protective Glass for City Buildings (Miami Beach Botanical Garden) Project in Planning Stage Wind Unknown Grant Applied For 117,000.00 61 > 1 year The city is a barrier island that is subject to high winds, missile hazards and significant impact damage. The buildings listed below require protection for windows during a significant weather event. Municipalities Miami Beach Storm Shutters and Protective Glass for City Buildings (Mount Sinai Hospital) Future Unfunded Project Wind TBD 8,000,000.00 81 2/14/2014 > 1 year Storm Shutters and Protective Glass for City Buildings: The city is a barrier island that is subject to high winds, missile hazards and significant impact damage. The buildings listed below require protection for windows during a significant weather event. Municipalities Miami Beach Storm Shutters and Protective Glass for City Buildings (North Shore Park & Youth Center) Future Unfunded Project Wind TBD 317,455.00 0 unknown The building requires protection for windows during a significant weather event. The city is a barrier island that is subject to high winds, missile hazards and significant impact damage. 70 of 93 236 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Miami Beach Stormwater Outfall and Seawall Reconstruction Funding Applied for Flood/Storm Surge,Flood,Storm Surge,Sea Level Rise Unknown Grant Applied For 1,800,000.00 83 > 1 year Stormwater Outfall and Seawall Reconstruction: Replacement of seawalls and 150 stormwater outfalls with associated relining of piping leading to outfalls in areas that have three properties with repetitive flood claims. Project will also include a pollution control device and possible demolition of existing seawalls, repair of seawalls, and relocation of riprap. Status: Seawalls are under construction along Dade Boulevard/Collins Canal. Additional seawalls on the priority list are in the design and bidding phase of construction. Municipalities Miami Beach Stormwater System Improvements Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Wind,Storm Surge,Health Potential grant funding 20,000,000.00 80 11/30/2017 2019 Potential activities of this project include: install backflow preventers at outfalls, construct new stormwater pump stations, add pumps to gravity systems, create storage for stormwater, and raise seawalls to mandated heights. Municipalities Miami Beach Streetlight System Upgrade Project in Planning Stage Flood/Storm Surge,Flood,Powe r Failure,Storm Surge,Technologic al Disruption Unknown Grant Applied For 1,600,000.00 76 > 1 year Streetlight System Upgrade: There are approximately 8,400 streetlight poles located throughout the City. Public Works is in the process of developing street lighting standards that will be used to upgrade the street lights when neighborhoods are reconstructed or insufficient lighting is addressed. Standards will be developed for average street lighting as well as individual fixtures. Lighting upgrades will also be in response to Police Department requests to combat crime and illegal activities. Status: The City has completed a citywide photometric analysis and is developing plans for strategic enhancements. Municipalities Miami Beach Sunset Harbor Pump Station Upgrades / Drainage Improvements Construction/Project Begun Flood/Storm Surge,Flood,Storm Surge,Sea Level Rise Potential Grant Applied For 800,000.00 86 September 2016 Sunset Harbor Pump Station Upgrades and Drainage Improvements: During the construction of the stormwater system upgrades, the City determined that the project should be expanded to include raising the road elevation/improving the storm drainage system in the entire neighborhood. This project will provide a higher level of storm water service to the Sunset Harbor neighborhood. Phase II of the project aims to provide a higher level of service defined by flood protection and control of pollutant loading in the stormwater system. The improvements consist of one or a combination of the following: 1) Repair, replace, and/or install curbs and gutters, 2) Reconstruct and/or raise streets and sidewalks, 3) Repair, replace, and/or install collection systems, catch basins and manholes, 4) Construct water quality treatment devices, 5) Construct pump stations, controls and force mains, and 6) Repair or upgrade existing outfall pipes and seawalls (inclusive of tidal backflow prevention devices). Status: The stormwater collection system and road-raising is nearing completion with expected substantial completion anticipated in 2017. Municipalities Miami Beach Sunset Islands 1 & 2 – New Pump Stations Future Unfunded Project Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge Unknown Grant Applied For 0.00 79 10/23/2015 > 1 year Sunset Islands 1 & 2 – New Pump Stations: The purpose of the project improvements is to provide a higher level of service defined by flood protection and control of pollutant loading in the stormwater system. The improvements consist of one or a combination of the following: 1) Construct additional stormwater collection system piping to interconnect existing pipe networks, 2) Construct water quality treatment devices, 3) Construct pumping stations, controls and force mains, and 4) Repair or upgrade existing outfall pipes and seawalls (inclusive of tidal backflow prevention devices). Status: This is a future project. Municipalities Miami Beach Sunset Islands 3 & 4 – Neighborhood Improvements 25% complete Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge Unknown Grant Applied For 0.00 85 10/21/2015 > 1 year Sunset Islands 3 & 4 – Neighborhood Improvements: The purpose is to provide a higher level of service defined by flood protection and control of pollutant loading in the stormwater system. The improvements consist of one or a combination of the following: 1) Repair, replace, and/or install curbs and gutters, 2) Reconstruct and/or raise streets and sidewalks, 3) Repair, replace, and/or install collection systems, catch basins and manholes, 4) Construct water quality treatment devices, 5) Construct pump stations, controls and force mains, and 6) Repair or upgrade existing outfall pipes and seawalls (inclusive of tidal backflow prevention devices). Status: The overall project is approximately 40% complete. The project is scheduled for substantial completion in Spring 2017. Municipalities Miami Beach Upgrading of Miami Beach Police Dept. Marine Patrol’s two (2) 32’ Contender boats Project in Planning Stage Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Power Failure,Storm Surge,Technologic al Disruption,Wind,O ther TBD 0.00 73 11/7/2016 December 2017 The upgrading of the Contenders with highly technical navigation, illumination and detection equipment (plus new high-powered engines), will provide the capability for the MBPD Marine Patrol to address both man made and natural disasters. In relation to the latter, the boats will, when upgraded, have a 24 hour capability, and will not be hampered by poor visibility and/or bad weather. This will enable officers to rescue citizens on limited access islands or other boats, in most weather and daylight conditions. In addition, it will provide the capability to tackle waterborne threats, e.g. unoccupied boats that have burst their moorings during storms. Municipalities Miami Beach Venetian Islands – Neighborhood Improvements (Phase 2) Construction/Project Begun ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge TBD 0.00 84 11/14/2016 2020 Venetian Islands – Neighborhood Improvements (Phase 2): The purpose is to provide a higher level of service defined by flood protection and control of pollutant loading in the stormwater system. The improvements consist of one or a combination of the following: 1) Repair or upgrade existing outfall pipes and seawalls (inclusive of tidal backflow prevention devices); 2) Construct water quality treatment devices; and 3) Construct pump stations, controls, and force mains. Status: This project is under construction. 71 of 93 237 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Miami Beach West Avenue Bridge Project in Planning Stage Other Unknown Grant Applied For 5,400,000.00 87 > 1 year West Avenue Bridge: The project is of regional significance and will help relieve congestion on State road 907 (Alton Road). A connected West Avenue would help reduce the volume of local traffic at the busiest intersections. In addition, it would provide a safer venue for cyclists, pedestrians, and motorists making their way to the causeway to Miami, than other existing venues. Status: The project has been awarded and is in the design phase. Municipalities Miami Beach West Avenue Neighborhood Drainage Improvements Construction/Project Begun Flood/Storm Surge,Flood,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge Potential Grant Applied For 15,900,000.00 85 September 2016 West Avenue Neighborhood Drainage Improvements: Drainage improvements for West Avenue (5th to 8th Street) as well as 10th, 14th, and 17th Streets (Alton Road to West Avenue) consist of new pump stations, additional drainage collection, conveyance, treatment, and disposal facilities. This drainage project will mitigate street-level flooding and reduce residential/commercial flooding concerns. Status: The project is under construction with anticipated completion by the end of 2016. Municipalities Miami Gardens 20060 NW 29th Court, minor drainage improvement Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge,Flood Unfunded at this time 100,000.00 0 6 mos to 1 year The following areas have been identified as having severe flooding problems, and the stated improvements will reduce property damage and repetitive losses from future rain events. These projects also improve water quality of stormwater runoff, which is a requirement of the County and federal permits. All projects will consist of French Drain systems, with emergency overflow outfalls where needed. French Drains capture the first inch of stormwater runoff on the property site, and allow treatment for pollution, and then percolation into the ground. Municipalities Miami Gardens 3857 NW 213 Street, still under investigation for scope of drainage improvements Project in Planning Stage Flood/Storm Surge Secured Identified Funding Source 1,200,000.00 0 > 1 year The following areas have been identified as having severe flooding problems, and the stated improvements will reduce property damage and repetitive losses from future rain events. These projects also improve water quality of stormwater runoff, which is a requirement of the County and federal permits. All projects will consist of French Drain systems, with emergency overflow outfalls where needed. French Drains capture the first inch of stormwater runoff on the property site, and allow treatment for pollution, and then percolation into the ground. Municipalities Miami Gardens Burial of Power Lines Future Unfunded Project Wind Unsecured 10,000,000.00 0 < one year Due to wind storms, the burial of main electrical lines (FPL, cable, telephone, etc.) is essential to the community. This will minimize damage to property and loss of life, and gain a faster return to normal operations as soon as possible Municipalities Miami Gardens Community Emergency Response Teams Future Unfunded Project All Hazards Unsecured 50,000.00 0 > than one year This project's goal is to continue CERTS for the City. When an emergency or disaster occurs at anytime and anyplace in the City, trained CERT volunteers will be ready and able to respond to save lives and protect property. CERT members will be able to do the greatest good for the greatest number after a disaster, while protecting them from becoming victims. This program will include but not be limited to basic medical treatment procedures, scene safety, securing utilities, and other hazards, and some rescue operations. Municipalities Miami Gardens Create GIS Layer for Storm Sewer Infrastructure 25% complete Flood/Storm Surge Unsecured 100,000.00 0 >1 year This project aims to update the City's GIS for storm sewer infrastructure, to get the latest information possible. This will mitigate flooding if a major event occurs, through the City having accurate information on which drainage systems to investigate, maintain, and clean before flood events occur. this project lies within the C8 and C9 drainage basins, as defined by the South Florida Water Management District Municipalities Miami Gardens Culvert and Headwall Project Funding Secured ,Other,Flood Potential Identified Funding Source 400,000.00 64 9/30/2016 Oct 2018 Reconstruct failing culverts/headwall on NW 19 and 20 Avenue and NW 173 Street area. Municipalities Miami Gardens Drainage Improvement NW 191- 195 Street, from NW 2nd Ave (441) to NW 7th Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unsecured 960,000.00 0 unknown The following areas have been identified as having severe flooding problems, and the stated improvements will reduce property damage and repetitive losses from future rain events. These projects also improve water quality of stormwater runoff, which is a requirement of the County and federal permits. All projects will consist of French Drain systems, with emergency overflow outfalls where needed. French Drains capture the first inch of stormwater runoff on the property site, and allow treatment for pollution, and then percolation into the ground. Municipalities Miami Gardens drainage improvement NW 191Street- 196 Terrace, from NW Sunshine State Parkway East to NW 12 Avenue Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Potential Identified Funding Source 84,000.00 0 unknown The following areas have been identified as having severe flooding problems, and the stated improvements will reduce property damage and repetitive losses from future rain events. These projects also improve water quality of stormwater runoff, which is a requirement of the County and federal permits. All projects will consist of French Drain systems, with emergency overflow outfalls where needed. French Drains capture the first inch of stormwater runoff on the property site, and allow treatment for pollution, and then percolation into the ground. Municipalities Miami Gardens Drainage improvement NW 205-207 Street from NW 28-33 Ave Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Potential Identified Funding Source 300,000.00 0 > 1 year The following areas have been identified as having severe flooding problems, and the stated improvements will reduce property damage and repetitive losses from future rain events. These projects also improve water quality of stormwater runoff, which is a requirement of the County and federal permits. All projects will consist of French Drain systems, with emergency overflow outfalls where needed. French Drains capture the first inch of stormwater runoff on the property site, and allow treatment for pollution, and then percolation into the ground. Municipalities Miami Gardens Drainage Improvements 1311 NW 195 Street Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unsecured Identified Funding Source 100,000.00 0 > 1 year The following areas have been identified as having severe flooding problems, and the stated improvements will reduce property damage and repetitive losses from future rain events. These projects also improve water quality of stormwater runoff, which is a requirement of the County and federal permits. All projects will consist of French Drain systems, with emergency overflow outfalls where needed. French Drains capture the first inch of stormwater runoff on the property site, and allow treatment for pollution, and then percolation into the ground. Municipalities Miami Gardens Drainage Improvements NW 170 St west of 22 Ave Project in Planning Stage Flood/Storm Surge DR Horton Adjacent Development to construct a 750 feet drainage system on ROW for the City to install a connection from the flooding area. To be coordinated with DR Horton's Development's Consultant with the City's past study. Identified Funding Source 150,000.00 0 > 1 year The following areas have been identified as having severe flooding problems, and the stated improvements will reduce property damage and repetitive losses from future rain events. Two repetitive losses exist in this area. These projects also improve water quality of stormwater runoff, which is a requirement of the County and federal permits. All projects will consist of French Drain systems, with emergency overflow outfalls where needed. French Drains capture the first inch of stormwater runoff on the property site, and allow treatment for pollution, and then percolation into the ground. The project lies within the C8 drainage basin, as defined by the South Florida Water Management District. 72 of 93 238 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Miami Gardens Flood Mitigation Funding Applied for ,Flood Potential...Stormwater and awaiting future grant funding. Grant Applied For 570,000.00 61 10/28/2014 1 Year Four Ditches along NW 203 St between 7-12 Avenues require constant maintenance, and the seawalls are collapsing. Project would convert ditches to culverts, thereby minimizing flood potential and maintenance requirements. Municipalities Miami Gardens Floodproofing Police Department Building Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge No grants at this time applied for 50,000.00 0 unknown This Project consists of applying flood proofing techniques to all the doors and low-lying windows of the City's Police Department. This will reduce damage to the building and its contents during a major rain event Municipalities Miami Gardens Kings Gardens #3 Other ,Flood,Other Unidentified funding at this time since it is on private property and the City cannot take over the streets due to the streets being part of the property lines. Grant Applied For 1,886,283.00 72 1/13/2014 over one year Kings Garden is a private community where the association owns the roads and drainage. Through time, the roads and drainage have declined due to a lack of maintenance. The decline is to the extent that the situation is a driving and flooding hazard for the residents in the area. In addition, due to the poor maintenance of the road/driveway, many road/driveway no longer exists in spots where there are giant potholes and we have a safety issue. The City cannot do anything other than cite the property owners under the City's Property Maintenance Ordinance. This proposal would either buy the roads and drainage and restore them to current standards, or work with the community to do the same. Drainage would be evaluated, and any functional parts of the system would be kept. The rest of the system would be completely removed, and up-to-date drainage constructed. this project lies within the C9 drainage basin, as defined by the South Florida Water Management District. Municipalities Miami Gardens Livable Neighborhoods Initiative Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge State, CDBG, Stormwater, and CITT Grant Awarded 12,500,000.00 0 > than one year The livable neighborhoods initiative is an infrastructure improvement project consisting of the provision of new drainage, sewer, roadway paving, sidewalk, lighting, and landscaping of three low-to-moderate income residential neighborhoods in the City. The project will be implemented in phases, depending upon funding availability. This project lies within the C8 and C9 drainage basins, as defined by the South Florida Water Management District. Municipalities Miami Gardens NW 11 Avenue Stormwater Drainage Project Funding Secured ,Flood Stormwater Funds Funding Secured 100,000.00 72 1/17/2014 less than 6 months This project mitigates the harmful effects of stormwater runoff causing flooding and erosion. It is an exfiltration system to include sediment traps, pollution baffles, and permeable piping, filter cloth and ballast rocks that will be designed for the 5-year South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) storm event and requirements by Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources (formerly DERM). It will consist of restoration of any roads, sidewalks, and swales impacted during construction. This project will enhance the quality of runoff groundwater by reducing contaminates that will seep into the ground and will result in reduced volumes and enhanced quality of discharges to surface waters. Municipalities Miami Gardens NW 13 Avenue/Industrial Area Drainage Outfall Project Funding Secured ,Flood Stormwater Funding for Design at this Time: $50,000 (FY-16) - Design and $180,000 (FY-18) - Construction. Identified Funding Source 230,000.00 72 1/13/2014 Less than one year This project will tie all the drainage structures on NW 13 Avenue from NW 167 Street to NW 155 Drive to an outfall into the Biscayne Canal. Funding will be used for design, permitting and construction for an exfiltration system to include sediment traps, pollution baffles, and permeable piping, filter cloth and ballast rocks that will be designed for the 5-year South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) storm event and the minimum required by Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources (formerly DERM). It will consist of restoration of any roads, sidewalks, and swales impacted during construction. This project lies within the C8 drainage basin, as defined by the South Florida Water Management District. Municipalities Miami Gardens NW 27 Avenue Canal Stabilization Other ,Flood,Storm Surge No funding at this time... Identified Funding Source 2,000,000.00 76 1/13/2014 6 mos to 1 year This project is being proposed in the City of Miami Gardens' Future CRA for canal stabilization (to control bank erosion) on NW 27 Avenue from Snake Creek Canal to County Line Road. This project will grade banks and install geo-web system. This project lies within the C9 drainage basin, as defined by the South Florida Water Management District. Municipalities Miami Gardens NW 34TH COURT/ NW 203RD STREET DRAINAGE Funding Applied for ,Flood Stormwater Funding with State DEP Legislative Funding($150,000)- Secured for FY 2017 Grant Awarded 250,000.00 62 6/23/2016 less than one year The intersection of NW 33 Court/ NW 203 Street and the connecting streets, flood during periods of heavy rainfall. The existing drainage is insufficient to capture the runoff from the adjacent streets. This is further constrained by the roundabout at the intersection. A comprehensive design is required to investigate the extent of the drainage and provide for the construction of interconnection between the existing. The community is located in the north-west corner of the City, just south of the Snake Creek (C-9) Canal. Improvement of this intersection will greatly improve the safety and quality of lives of the residents. This request is for the design and construction of drainage improvements. Municipalities Miami Gardens Pre-emptive Tree Trimming at City Parks Future Unfunded Project Wind Unsecured 40,000.00 0 unknown This project consists of trimming trees in City parks to ISA standards. Properly trimmed trees better withstand storms. Removing dead or diseased trees also mitigates the wind hazard. This includes: Removing dead and diseased wood from all tree specimens within the park system; removing trees that exhibit a geotropic growth pattern and that pose a public health and safety hazard to citizens in the parks; and remove weak and deformed crotches as well as major branches that have been broken in previous storms. this project lies within the C8 and C9 drainage basins, as defined by the South Florida Water Management District. Municipalities Miami Gardens Removal of Australian Pines and Other Exotics Future Unfunded Project Wind Unsecured 1,000,000.00 0 > than one year Debris removal after a storm is an expensive and time-consuming process. Fallen trees can delay the re-entry process by blocking access to roads and properties. This project would create a permanent ongoing tree removal program. It would ensure removal of exotic trees on public rights-of-way. The exotics would be replaced by appropriate native trees that will enhance the City's tree canopy. The City will maintain the new native trees. Municipalities Miami Gardens Sanitary Sewer Line along SR441 Other ,Other,Health No funding at this time Identified Funding Source 2,200,000.00 74 1/13/2014 more than one year This project is proposed for the future City of Miami Gardens CRA Projects. The purpose is to upgrade from septic tanks to the sanitary sewer system in the commercial and residential areas along SR 441 from the Snake Creek Canal south to NW 183 Street. This is approximately 2.82 Miles of sanitary sewer line, manholes, service connections, sidewalk, driveways, and pavement repairs as needed. This project lies within the C9 drainage basin, as defined by the South Florida Water Management District. Municipalities Miami Gardens Storm Shutter Program Future Unfunded Project Wind None at this time Identified Funding Source 100,000.00 0 . than one year The City will provide financial assistance to twenty owner-occupied single family homeowners to install hurricane shutters on all windows. The financial assistance will be in the form of a deferred forgive-able loan for five years. The City has an existing process for qualifying residents to participate in the program. The shutters will be installed by a City-approved licensed and insured contractor. this project lies within the C8 and C9 drainage basins, as defined by the South Florida Water Management District. Municipalities Miami Gardens Swale Tree Trimming and Debris Clearance Future Unfunded Project Wind Unsecured 275,000.00 0 unknown Develop and implement a citywide program to trim trees prior to hurricane season, which will allow for increased survivability of trees and will reduce safety concerns of residents. This initiative will also reduce debris and protect infrastructure such as sidewalks and roads. Municipalities Miami Gardens Vista Verde Drainage and Roadway Improvement Project Funding Secured ,Flood Stormwater, CDBG, CITT, and State Legislative Appropriations Grants Grant Awarded 3,800,000.00 64 6/23/2016 less than 3 years The funds will be spent to construct an exfiltration system to alleviate flooding in this neighborhood. This is an extensive drainage project that has been split into 4 phases. 73 of 93 239 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Miami Gardens Vista Verde Remaining Phae from Snake Creak Canal to NW 41 Ave Rd Project in Planning Stage Flood/Storm Surge State, Stormwater, CDBG, CITT through each budget cycle Grant Applied For 3,000,000.00 0 > than one year Sediment removal and canal stabilization and headwall and culver repairs Municipalities Miami Lakes EOC Generator Construction/Project Begun ,Flood/Storm Surge,Power Failure,Storm Surge,Other,Tech nological Disruption Potential mitigation grant.Funding Secured 279,229.00 94 8/3/2015 4 months Town is seeking funding for the procurement and installation of one (1) New Generator to power and protect a critical facility, the Town EOC, located at 6601 Main Street, Town Hall, in Miami Lakes. Attachments are as follows: Attachment #1: Scope Attachment #2: Plans Attachment #3: OPC/Cost Estimate Municipalities Miami Lakes Lake Sarah Drainage Improvements Funding Secured Flood,Sea Level Rise Secured DEP and SFWMD.Grant Awarded 2,200,000.00 81 12/1/2011 12 months The Town of Miami Lakes is located in northwestern Miami-Dade County, Florida and was incorporated in December 2000. In 2003, the Town completed its Stormwater Master Plan, assuming responsibility for Stormwater management within its boundaries. In addition, the Town adopted ordinance 03-31 which established the Town’s Stormwater Utility and assumed maintenance responsibility from Miami-Dade County for drainage facilities located within the Town boundary. The Town continues to perform updates to its existing Stormwater Master Plan in order to enable the Town to examine the effectiveness of the ongoing Stormwater Operation, Maintenance and Capital Improvement Programs. The Project is located between Miami Lakeway South, SR 924, Palmetto Expressway (SR826) and NW 67th Avenue. The Project area includes Big Cypress Drive, Twin Sable Drive, Bamboo Street and Bamboo Court, Cypress Court, Alamanda Avenue, Silver Oaks Drive, Sea Grape Terrace and White Oak Drive in the southeast residential area of the Town of Miami Lakes, Florida. The Project latitude and longitude coordinates for the area are 25.9023N and -80.3185W. The Lake Sarah Sub-basin was analyzed as part of the Town’s Stormwater Master Plan. The existing drainage system in this sub- basin consists of catch basins discharging to the Lake. Roadside swales and exfiltration trenches provide some water quality pre- treatment and storage of roadway run-off. However, there are several areas of flooding extending to the centerline of the roadway within this sub-basin. The sub-basin consists of approximately 285 acres of existing detached single family homes, parks and lakes. Based on detailed hydrologic and hydraulic calculations for this sub-basin, the majority of the modeled drainage areas within the sub-basin do not currently meet the Town’s performance goals. In addition, some catch basins in this sub-basin were observed to be filled with debris and sediment blocking, or highly restricting flow. The hydrologic and hydraulic calculations for this sub-basin reveal that the existing drainage infrastructure does not discharge adequate runoff to meet the desired performance criteria. The capacity of the existing swales and French drains are not sufficient to discharge the volume of runoff outlined in the performance criteria during storm events. Furthermore, roadway settlement at intersections was observed as a result of inadequate drainage conditions. Improvements to drainage infrastructure are needed to address these inadequacies. The proposed Project construction and drainage improvements include cleaning and flushing all sediment and debris from existing catch basins and pipes, and adjusting catch basin elevations and locations to minimize accumulation of sediment and debris. The Town will install the additional infrastructure, modify or reconstruct existing catch basins as required to provide sediment traps (sumps), and install additional exfiltration trench to provide supplementary storage and treatment prior to positive drainage. The final catch basin prior to each outfall will be a control structure with a weir, Municipalities Miami Lakes Lakes Water Quality Improvements Future Unfunded Project Health,Storm Surge,Flood,Flood /Storm Surge,Sea Level Rise,Other Potential in the future.Identified Funding Source 200,000.00 76 6/30/2013 12 months Infrastructure improvements to treat storm water runoff and improve water quality. The project will install a system of catch basins that connect to exfiltration trenches which discharge into the lakes. Municipalities Miami Lakes Royal Oaks Drainage Improvements Future Unfunded Project Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge Potential Identified Funding Source 2,000,000.00 85 12/1/2011 24 months This project includes construction of the drainage system which includes installation of stormwater pipes, exfiltration trenches (French Drains) and catch basins, creating a new outfall and restoration and resurfacing of the existing roadway surfaces. The Royal Oaks community has designated Repetitive Loss properties. Municipalities Miami Lakes Traffic Signal Emergency Power Project in Planning Stage Power Failure,Storm Surge,Wild Fire,Wind,Technol ogical Disruption Potential future funding. Identified Funding Source 45,000.00 89 12/1/2011 6 months In the event of power outages, the town wishes to obtain and install transfer switches for additional energy sources on electrical boxes connected to traffic signals. This will allow the town to disconnect the electricity and connect to portable generators to power the traffic signals, thus eliminating the dangers from power surges when the electricity is repaired. This includes a power source for the Town variable-message-sign (VMS) to be used for emergency situations. Municipalities Miami Lakes West Lakes Drainage Improvements Phase III Future Unfunded Project Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge Potential.Identified Funding Source 1,950,000.00 92 12/1/2011 24 months This project includes drainage system installation of drainage pipes in residential roads and exfiltration trenches (French Drains), connecting to the stormwater main line on NW 89th Avenue leading to an outfall. Project Design was completed in 2014. The underground infrastructure completed in 2016, previously funded in part by the Florida Legislature, is the main system which West Lakes Drainage Improvements Phase III (SUB-BASINS B, C, D and E) new structures and inlets will intersect, completing this drainage system. Currently, the estimated construction, permit, and construction administration cost is $1.95M. The need for this mitigation activity is to reduce the risk of future damage, hardship, loss, or suffering resulting from a major disaster or flood. There are 17 streets within the West Lakes Sub-basins. All streets flood. This mitigation activity must be completed to protect the West Lakes community and the Town of Miami Lakes from flooding and potential damages to homes. All localized flooding will be virtually eliminated once the Project is complete. The Project increases stormwater management capacity, reduces the possibility of severe repetitive flooding, and completes localized flood control to protect residential homes. Total Benefits: $19,324,848 with a BCR:8.20. Project Useful Life (years): 30 years. Municipalities Miami Shores 105 Street Drainage Pump Station Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge,Sea Level Rise Identified Funding Source 1,500,000.00 67 1/28/2015 unknown The neighborhood in the vicinity of 104 Street has been experiencing flooding during times of heavy rain especially during high tide and also sunny day flooding in relation to king tides. The drainage pump system will allow Miami Shores to pump against high and king tides to reduce localized flooding. Municipalities Miami Shores Bayshore Drive Pump Station Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge Funding not yet secured 1,600,000.00 79 01/11/2018 6 Months from Funding The existing Bayshore Drive pump station was affected by hurricane Irma and the station that exists now experienced salt water intrusion that affected the performance capability of the pump. The village would like to lift the concrete pad that the electrical box rests on now, salt water intrusion from hurince Irma caused corrosion, lifint the electrical box would ensure that the pump system has a better likely hood of staying unaffected during any future storms. Also a replacement subsurface fuel tank is necissary. 74 of 93 240 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Miami Shores C-8 Canal Pump System Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge Funding not yet secured 1,400,000.00 0 01/11/2018 One Year From Project Start C-8 canal system in the neighborhood of NE 105th st ( behind the K-Mart) needs a water control system to collect flood waters as they rise to keep from getting into the roads and homes in the neighborhood. This system would reduce the risk and the effects of future residential flooding. Municipalities Miami Shores C-8 Canal Seawall Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge,Sea Level Rise Funding not yet secured 230,000.00 79 01/11/2018 6 Months from funding date In order to prevent future flooding to the residential area of NE 105th st ( behind the K-Mart) the Village would like to instal a new seawall to lessen the likelyhood that water from the canal will intrude and cause damages in the future to homes and the roadways in that area. Municipalities Miami Shores Harden and Flood Proof Public Works Facility Future Unfunded Project Flood,Wind (Select)710,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown Strengthen the existing Butler Aluminum Building with structural reinforcements including raising the floor elevation; adding injection well / exfiltration drainage system to protect administrative/inventory storage from flooding. Make existing offices hurricane proof by using poured concrete roofing and steel reinforced doors, enabling the facility to augment Village Hall as an employee hurricane shelter during storms. Replace existing overhead garage doors with hurricane proof doors. Strengthen UHF radio tower to withstand hurricane force wind loads. Municipalities Miami Shores Harden Windows in 2nd Floor Police Department Future Unfunded Project Wind (Select)50,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown Hurricane-rated protection is needed for the windows of the Miami Shores Village Police Station's 2nd Floor. Municipalities Miami Shores Harden Windows in the Miami Shores Golf & Country Club Future Unfunded Project Wind (Select)150,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown Hurricane-rated protection is needed for the windows of the Miami Shores Village Golf & Country Club. Municipalities Miami Shores Harden Windows in the Recreation Field House Future Unfunded Project Wind (Select)50,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown Hurricane-rated protection is needed for the windows of the Miami Shores Village Recreation Field House. Municipalities Miami Shores Hurricane Proof Emergency Generator Room (Police Department) Future Unfunded Project Wind (Select)61,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown Replace the aluminum cover currently housing the generator used for emergency power to support public safety operations during and after hurricanes. Replace with a hardened poured concrete structure. Municipalities Miami Shores Redesign Bayfront Park Seawall Future Unfunded Project Wind (Select)1,500,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown Design and construct new seawall system using poured concrete and tiebacks to replace existing 900 foot seawall, currently in poor condition. Explore more hurricane resistant design, including the angling of the seawall to allow better deflection of wave action. Re-engineer pylons to accept pedestrian safety rails. Municipalities Miami Springs Engineering Study to determine sites of canal bank restoration 25% complete ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge Department of Environmental Protection Division of Water Protection Assistance Grant Awarded 2,000,000.00 0 unknown Miami Springs has numerous locations along the Melrose Canal that need to be studied and mitigated through canal bank stabilization. Municipalities Miami Springs Removal of Australian Pines 50% complete Wind,Other City Budget Identified Funding Source 14,000.00 0 2025 The city has a large number of old, deteriorated Australian pines that easily become a hazard during high winds. The removal of these conifers requires specialized equipment and skills that city crews do not possess. This project would enable the city to hire a professional firm to remove approximately 30 Australian pines The City of Miami Springs has outsourced it tree trimming and removals and within the scope of work the Pines were included under pricing which in turn allows dollars for removals under more controlled environment. Municipalities Miami Springs Storm Shutter for Country Club Future Unfunded Project Wind City Budget Identified Funding Source 75,000.00 0 unknown Miami Springs utilized the Country Club as an emergency feeding site for critical city personnel post storm. The City plans to update the currentl panel shuttering system to an accordian system that would reduce the amount of time needed for Emergency Protective Measures. Municipalities North Bay Village Abandonment of 12" Force Main to Miami Beach Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Health None Identified 315,000.00 78 11/30/2017 Unknown Biscayne Bay was exposed to approximately 10,000 linear feet of sewage force main from North Bay Village to Miami Beach. A new force main to Miami (westbound) was installed within the past few years. The Village is now contemplating the abandonment of the Miami Beach (eastbound) 12" force main as it is no longer in service. However, due to limited funding availability, the Village is contemplating the grouting and abandonment of the force main. Municipalities North Bay Village Acquisition of Smart Meters Future Unfunded Project ,Power Failure,Technologi cal Disruption,Flood, Health,Storm Surge None Identified 10,000.00 85 11/30/2017 Unknown Acquisition of four (4) smart meters that immediately advise of a power outage. This will mitigate drastic environmental disasters caused by sewage overflow from the Village's four sewage pump stations. Municipalities North Bay Village Baywalk Plaza - Drainage Well Funding Secured ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge Park Improvement Fund (Secured) FIND Grant (Secured) Funding Secured 200,000.00 85 11/30/2017 3 months Design and development of a linear park along the Biscayne Bay waterfront in Treasure Island. The project will include the placement of drainage well that will conform with all regulatory agencies requirements. Municipalities North Bay Village Boardwalk Mitigation/Linear Park Future Unfunded Project ,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge FIND Grant (Potential) Impact Fees (Potential) Identified Funding Source 4,120,000.00 78 11/30/2017 Unknown The Village is proposing to construct a public overwater boardwalk and transient dock project along with several transient day- use only slips on the northern edge of Treasure Island and east towards the bridge leading to Miami Beach. This project will grant public access to the Village's waterfront. Additionally, the project will be incorporating the installation of reef ball modules to create living shorelines, promoting and enhancing the shoreline. Municipalities North Bay Village Catch Basin Improvements Funding Applied for ,Health,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Flood Stormwater Fund (Potential) Department of Environmental Protection Grant (Potential) Identified Funding Source 750,000.00 80 11/29/2017 12 months There are approximately 52 outfalls that are rapidly deteriorating due to corrosion and reaching the end of the life cycle. The Village is seeking to install flexible valves at the outfalls to prevent saltwater intrusion to the storm drainage system during storm and/or high tide events. These events are becoming more common in the South Florida region due to changing environmental conditions. With this project, the Village aims to achieve the Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserves Management Plan and reduce water quality impacts to surface water and groundwater caused by storm water and septic system sources within the watershed. The scope of this project will include the cleaning of existing outfalls and the installation of flexible closure valves (tideflex or approved equal) at each outfall. Municipalities North Bay Village City Hall Pump Station Replacement Funding Applied for ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Pow er Failure,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Technologic al Disruption State Revolving Loan Fund (Potential) Identified Funding Source 450,000.00 81 11/29/2017 6 months The scope of this project includes the replacement of two (2) pumps that support the Village's sewer collection system servicing Harbor Island and North Bay Island. The Village has made several repairs over the years to these pumps; however, the pumps are now at a critical stage where replacement is necessary due to constant operational issues. The improvements consist of the purchasing of new pumps with cutting head impellers, update the piping system and configuration, replacement of the control panel, and purchasing of a spare pump for emergencies. 75 of 93 241 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities North Bay Village Deep Well Injection System Rehabilitation Funding Secured ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge Stormwater Fund (Secured) Department of Environmental Protection Grant (Secured) Identified Funding Source 633,737.00 91 11/30/2017 1 month The Village has two Storm Water Deep Well Injection Pumps located on West Treasure Dr. in Treasure Island and on Bay Terr. in North Bay Island. The deep well injection pumps are in need of rehabilitation due to corrosion as well as electrical and mechanical failures. The deep wells are clogged and in need of cleaning. The scope of the rehabilitation will service the pumps, electrical panels, and controls at the two deep well injection pumps. With this project, the Village aims to achieve the Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserves Management Plan and reduce water quality impacts to surface water and groundwater caused by storm water and septic system sources within the watershed. Municipalities North Bay Village Digital City Survey Other Flood Unknown/None 35,500.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown This project encompasses the creation of a complete city electronic topographic survey in MicroStation? or AutoCAD. This will help incorporate the recently created geo-referenced wastewater system. By obtaining the global satellite positions for all wastewater manholes, pump stations, and force mains, the entire wastewater system for the city is now digitized. The city's water distribution system will be digitized once an entire city survey is created by obtaining the global satellite positions for all water valves, water meters, and water mains. Municipalities North Bay Village Existing Sewer Force Main Other Flood Unknown/None 66,600.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown This is a Division of Environmental Resource Management mandated project. In order for the city to continue day-to-day construction development the sole existing sewer force main must be inspected for leaks, structurally analyzed and protected. This project consists of performing a dye-test which will reveal any leaks in the pipe; as well as an ultrasonic scan which will provide the existing cross-sectional thickness of the pipe at several locations. The final step is the installation of 40 buoys marking the sewer force main trajectory. This will alert and prohibit vessels from damaging the brittle 38 year old force main. All previous breaks have been man endues. The first was an anchor, the second was a ship that ran ashore and the third was a vessel that stroke the main leaving a clear deformation, the forth was a 40' wooden pile that caused a perforation after Hurricanes Charlie and Frances. Municipalities North Bay Village GIS Conversion of Sanitary Sewer System 25% complete ,Other Utility Fund (Secured)Funding Secured 28,200.00 69 11/30/2017 4 months Conversion of existing CAD files and As-built data for the Village's sanitary sewer collection system to a GIS format for submittal to RER. The similar approach is going to be completed for the water distribution system. Municipalities North Bay Village Hispaniola Sewage Pump Station Other Flood Unknown/None 100,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown The city's wastewater system is made up of only four pump stations. The busiest pump station next to the main pump station is the Hispaniola pump station. This is a wet well/dry well station located on Treasure Island. A recent pump station inspection found the dry well to be in bad condition. The wall lining has peeled away, and in several areas, the wall itself has deteriorated to the point of exposing the rebar. Both pumps are barely operational and the pump controls were disintegrating. The calculated average daily flow to the station is 576 Gallons per minute (gpm). The station pumping capacity must be increased by a factor of 1.2 to meet EPA ten-hour criteria. This translates to a flow rate of 1383 gpm per pump to meet current needs and to account for the potential growth on Treasure Island. The project consists of converting the existing dry/wet pit station to a fully wet station. This will nearly double its holding capacity. Two new chopper pumps, which devourer any debris introduced in the sewer system, will be installed. Municipalities North Bay Village Hispanola Pump Station Replacement Funding Applied for ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Pow er Failure,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Technologic al Disruption,Wind State Revolving Loan Fund (Potential) Identified Funding Source 550,000.00 81 11/29/2017 6 months Replacemente of one (1) pump that supports the Village's sewer collection system. The scope of the project consists of the purchasing of a new pump with cutting head impellers, updating of the piping system and configuration, replacement of the control panel, purchasing of a spare pump for emergencies, and purchasing of an emergency generator to support the pump station in the event of a power outage. Municipalities North Bay Village Lift Stations Funding Applied for Flood/Storm Surge,Health,Pow er Failure,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Technologic al Disruption State Revolving Loan Fund (Potential) Identified Funding Source 900,000.00 88 11/30/2017 Unknown The Village's wastewater collection system consists of approximately 30,000 linear feet of sanitary sewers, 170 manholes, three (3) local pump stations and one (1) master pump station, and approximately 14,000 linear feet of force mains. Based on the Village's sanitary sewer collection system, the age and condition of the pumps and control panels, it has been deemed necessary that many of the Village's wastewater pumps, control panels, and generator systems require replacement. Municipalities North Bay Village Main Pump Station Replacement Funding Applied for ,Flood/Storm Surge,Flood,Healt h,Power Failure,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge State of Florida Revolving Loan Program (Potential) Identified Funding Source 700,000.00 81 11/29/2017 6 months Replacement of three (3) pumps that support the Village's sewer collection system. The improvements will include the purchasing of a new pump with cutting head impellers, updating of the piping system and configuration, replacement of the control panel, and the purchasing of a spare pump. Municipalities North Bay Village Municipal Park Future Unfunded Project Unknown/None 1,400,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown The city of North Bay Village serves over seven thousand residents and yet only has one very small �tot-lot.� The future of a city depends on the well-being of its young residents. A city park is greatly needed. This project will fund the acquisition of a lot and its conversion to a municipal Park. Municipalities North Bay Village North Bay Island Stormwater Pump Station Rehabilitation Other Flood/Storm Surge Unknown/None 124,840.00 0 12/1/2012 unkonwn When North Bay Island is affected by a severe storm, the storm surge or heavy rains can cause a great deal of damage to the public right of way and residential homes. Therefore we are proposing that the following project to be included in the Local Mitigation Strategy. Rehabilitation of the stormwater station located on North Bay Island. Municipalities North Bay Village Parks Facility - Seawall Repair Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Other G.O. Bonds (Potential)Identified Funding Source 400,000.00 79 11/30/2017 Unknown Continued development of a waterfront parcel to implement a park in North Bay Island. Proposed improvements for this lot consist of seawall repairs to strengthened the existing seawall. A park is greatly needed as the future of the Village depends on the well-being of its young residents. Municipalities North Bay Village Portable Engine Generator Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Pow er Failure,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Technologic al Disruption General Fund (Potential) Utility Fund (Potential) Identified Funding Source 250,000.00 80 11/29/2017 1 month Purchasing of a Three Phase Portable Engine Generator that will serve as a backup for the sewage pump stations in the event of a power outage. Failure of the Village's pump stations will result in raw sewage overflowing into the Village's streets and ultimately into the environmentally sensitive Biscayne Bay. Municipalities North Bay Village Rehabilitation of North Bay Island Storm Water Pump Funding Applied for ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Wind Stormwater Fund (Potential) Department of Environmental Protection Grant (Potential) Identified Funding Source 800,000.00 85 11/30/2017 Unknown North Bay Island is substantially affected during severe storms, heavy rains, and storm surge, causing damage to the public right- of-way and private property. 76 of 93 242 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities North Bay Village Roadway Resurfacing Funding Secured ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge State Revolving Fund Loan Program (Potential) Citizen Independent Transportation Trust by the Department of Transportation (Secured) Local Capital Improvements Gas Tax (Secured) Identified Funding Source 1,500,000.00 93 11/30/2017 18 months The roads in North Bay Village are approximately 50 years old. They were constructed on man-made fill which at the time consisted of boulders and organic materials. Essentially, any material available at the time. The structure for the roadway is not stable and has been settling to the point that the manholes protrude above the roadway. Furthermore, this condition has compounded the effect on all underground utilities that have settled along with the thoroughfares. The scope of this project is inclusive of the replacement of existing speed humps. Once these improvements are completed, all roadways within the Village will become safer. Municipalities North Bay Village Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Construction/Project Begun ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge State Revolving Loan Fund (Secured)Funding Secured 3,900,000.00 86 11/30/2017 20 months Evaluation of approximately 116,400 linear feet of the existing sewer system by televising the sewer mains and cleaning of 34,100 linear feet, inclusive of repair and replacement of segments of the sanitary sewer piping by means of lining, point repairs, lateral replacements, and grouting of lines based on evaluation of field investigations as well as replacing wastewater pumps and control systems. Completion of this rehabilitation plan will address inflow and infiltration issues to improve system performance and greatly reduce the public health risks, environmental impacts, and groundwater contamination associated with a deficient sanitary sewer system. Municipalities North Bay Village Smart Meters Other Power Failure Unknown/None 5,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown This project consist of the acquisition of four �smart meters� that immediately advise of a power outage. Telephoning up to three individuals and entering a trouble-ticket to Florida Power and Light. This will prevent drastic environmental disasters caused by sewage over flow out of the city's four sewage pump stations. Municipalities North Bay Village Storm Drainage Outfall Protection Other Flood/Storm Surge Unknown/None 100,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown This project involves video recording the existing storm drainage system, rehabilitating all portions needed, and the installation of backflow preventors at all stormwater outfalls in the city. This will prevent buildup of barnacles which decrease the cross- sectional diameter of the pipes in turn decreasing the flow capacity. The valves will maintain the high water table bay waters out of our storm system allowing our pipes to act as additional containment volume. Most importantly they will maintain flow moving in a positive flow and prohibit contaminants to enter Biscayne Bay and the waters of the United States. Municipalities North Bay Village Storm Drainage, Sewage, Bay Restoration Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown/None 6,500,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown This will be the biggest environmentally focused project the city has encountered. Biscayne Bay is currently exposed to almost 10,000 linear feet of North Bay Village-Miami Beach bound sewage pipe. This project involves a new Miami bound pipe. The new force main will originate at the city's main sewer pump station (Galleon Street) and travel to N. Treasure Drive turn north at Adventure Avenue and west on J.F. Kennedy Causeway (SR 934). It will turn south in NE 6th St. (Miami) and end at Miami-Dade County's sewer lift station just south of SR 934. This project involves storm water improvements to all roadways affected. The environment will benefit the most by replacing the current eastbound 10,000 linear feet of raw sewage pipe that crosses Biscayne Bay to only 300 linear feet of new westbound pipe. If horizontal directional drilling is used to cross under Biscayne Bay there would be zero pipe exposure to the bay. Municipalities North Bay Village Stormwater Outfall Rehabilitation Funding Secured ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge Stormwater Fund (Secured) State Revolving Fund Loan Program (Secured) Department of Environmental Protection Grant (Potential) Funding Secured 1,200,000.00 93 11/30/2017 9 months Repair and rehabilitation of the Village's stormwater outfall piping system. The scope of the project include the cleaning and lining of pipelines, point repairs, installation of outfall valves, back-flow preventors, utility testing, and system grouting. This project will prevent buildup of barnacles which decreases the cross-sectional diameter of the piping and in turn decreases the flow capacity. The valves will maintain the high water table bay waters out of the Village's stormwater system, allowing the piping to act as additional containment volume. Most importantly, the system will maintain a positive flow, prohibiting contaminants from entering into Biscayne Bay. Municipalities North Bay Village Underground Electrical Power Lines Future Unfunded Project Power Failure Unknown/None 7,070,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown This project involves the removal of above ground electrical power lines and the replacement of a complete underground electrical power line system for the entire city. The city of North Bay Village is within the hurricane evacuation Red Zone, which means it is exposed to possible severe damage. Having an underground electrical power system will tremendously lower the power outages caused by hurricane force winds. Municipalities North Bay Village Underground Utility Lines Future Unfunded Project ,Power Failure,Wind G.O. Bonds (Potential)Identified Funding Source 14,800,000.00 84 11/30/2017 Unknown Underground construction of electric, telephone, and cable lines throughout the Village. North Bay Village is within the hurricane evacuation Red Zone, which makes the Village prone to severe damage due to high winds. By having underground utilities systems will tremendously reduce outages and service interruptions during high wind events and will also greatly reduce life safety concerns. Municipalities North Bay Village Water Main Rehabilitation Construction/Project Begun ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge State Revolving Loan Fund (Secured)Funding Secured 4,400,000.00 83 11/29/2017 12 months The original water system for the Village was installed over 70 years ago. Based on Village atlas and GIS information, the existing water system was expanded approximately 50 years ago. To date, the system includes approximately eight miles of 2" through 30" pipelines inclusive of air release valves, isolation valves, water services, and fire hydrants. Furthermore, the Village's water mains are constantly under water and exposed to aggressive salinity content conditions that accelerate corrosion of the piping materials and shortens their life expectancy, and ultimately leading to leakage. As such, this project consists of the repair and replacement of deficient water distribution piping and system components based on water losses identified as part of a water leak analysis. This project will improve the system's performance, minimize water system losses, reduce loss of Village revenue, address public health risk components, and establish design parameters for the facilities improvements. Municipalities North Bay Village Water Meter and Service Line Replacement Construction/Project Begun ,Flood/Storm Surge,Health,Pow er Failure,Storm Surge,Technologic al Disruption,Other State Revolving Loan Fund (Secured)Funding Secured 4,700,000.00 83 11/29/2017 9 months The original water system for the Village was installed over 70 years ago. Based on Village atlas and GIS information, the existing water system was expanded approximately 50 years ago. The current water meters (over 620 units total) are over 15 years old and are not providing accurate readings. Further, the water table at the Village is very high and the lines and services are constantly underwater, exposed to aggressive salinity content and conditions that promote corrosion and accelerate the life expectancy of the materials, leading to leakage within the service lines. As such, this project addresses the replacement of the Village's water meters and water service connections. The project includes replacing all existing water meters and associated water service connections. All new meters are proposed to be automatic meter reader (AMR) devices. 77 of 93 243 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities North Miami Correct Water Infiltration at City Hall (EOC) Basement Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Storm Surge Potential Identified Funding Source 50,000.00 64 6 mos to 1 year Constructed in 1963, City Hall was designed to house a civil defense bomb shelter in the basement. Over the years, the need for a bomb shelter has become obsolete and the basement has been used for offices, classrooms, employee break rooms and storage space for department supplies. City records are also stored in the basement. Currently, the basement also contains office space for five municipalities which participate in the North Miami Divisional Emergency Operations Center. These municipalities house emergency response teams and are the link to the Miami-Dade EOC during natural disasters. Since the basement is below the natural water table, the structural integrity of the walls and flooring has diminished causing water intrusion. The walls and flooring should be sealed and possibly excavated and sealed along exterior walls. Correcting the flooding problem in the basement, will ensure that vital facilities and staff are secure during major storm events Municipalities North Miami Emergency Portable Stormwater Pumps Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge Potential Grant Applied For 500,000.00 71 6 mos to 1 year The easternmost boundary of North Miami borders Biscayne Bay for approximately 3 miles. There are, therefore, several low- lying areas that flood during regular rainfall and major storm events. The city is seeking funds to purchase four portable emergency pumps to assist in the discharge of stormwater runoff. These four portable pumps will be housed at the Utility Operation Center located near low-lying coastal areas to ensure a timely response. These portable stormwater pumps will help prevent repetitive flooding, reduce damages to residential properties, and decrease the number of recurring insurance claims. Municipalities North Miami Emergency Power for Water and Sewer Utility Operations Center Future Unfunded Project ,Power Failure This project is future project Identified Funding Source 90,000.00 68 less than 6 months The city's Water and Sewer Utility Operations Center is not manned during major storm events. The Center, however, must be operational immediately after an all-clear notice is issued. All Water and Sewer equipment, materials and supplies are stored at this location. In addition, repair crews are dispatched and monitored from the Center during storm events and other emergencies. The city is therefore seeking funds to install a stationary emergency generator at the Center. Municipalities North Miami Gravity Sewer Systems Improvements for Groundwater Infiltration Reduction Future Unfunded Project ,Other The project calls for lining the interior of existing sewer lines. Identified Funding Source 6,000,000.00 63 > 1 year The city is seeking funds to implement remedial protocols, namely sanitary sewer pipe lining and manhole rehabilitation to reduce groundwater infiltration into the sanitary sewer collection system. The project calls for lining the interior of existing sewer lines. Lining the system will significantly reduce the inflow and infiltration of ground water into the sewer collection system. This, in turn, will reduce the total volume of water being treated at the Miami-Dade County Sewage Treatment Facility consequently reducing processing costs. In addition, this project will also reduce leakage of raw sewage from existing compromised lines into the environment, prevent groundwater contamination and ensure the public health, safety and general welfare of are residents. Municipalities North Miami Non-critical Facilities Hazard Mitigation Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge,Flood,Storm Surge,Other The city has identified seven of its buildings as non-critical facilities. Grant Applied For 400,000.00 61 6 mos to 1 year The city has identified seven of its buildings as non-critical facilities. These facilities support the restoration of essential city services after major storm events and other emergencies. Non-critical facilities include five community centers (Enchanted Forest Community Center, Griffing Senior Adult Center, Gwen Margolis Community Center, Keystone Center and Sunkist Grove Community Center), the Museum of Contemporary Art and the Parks Operation Center. Non-critical buildings are used as staging facilities by city staff, FEMA, Red Cross, and other emergency response agencies. Over the years, building officials and staff have researched various types of protection, ranging from plywood to roll down fixed metal shutters and shields. Non-critical city facilities, currently secure their windows and doors with plywood. Plywood requires considerable storage space and time- consuming installation. The installation of a combination high impact/shatterproof windows, roll downs and/or hurricane proof screens in these facilities will reduce significantly the time, manpower and storage currently required to secure them. To date only the Building and Zoning Building has hurricane shutters installed. Municipalities North Miami Replacement Generator for Police Station Future Unfunded Project ,Power Failure Potential Identified Funding Source 425,000.00 63 6 mos to 1 year The current generator, which is over 15 years old, supplies back up power for the North Miami Police Station. The Police Station is an integral part of Miami-Dade County's Emergency Management's Divisional Response Plan. The city of North Miami is one of seven municipalities identified as host cities (Division 2) housing a Divisional Emergency Operations Center and serving not only city residents but also residents from the Town of Bay Harbor Islands, the Village of Biscayne Park, the town of Surfside, Indian Creek and North Bay Village. The ability to operate and provide communications from a functional facility during manmade or natural disasters is of vital importance to the overall safety of the community and neighboring municipalities. The City is therefore seeking funds to replace the back-up generator at the Police Station. Municipalities North Miami Replacement of U.P.S. for Police Station Future Unfunded Project ,Power Failure This is one of the future projects.Grant Applied For 80,000.00 65 6 mos to 1 year The City of North Miami is an integral part of Miami-Dade County's Emergency Divisional Response Plan. The City of North Miami is one of seven municipalities identified as host cities, serving the Town of Bay Harbor Islands, the Village of Biscayne Park, the Town of Surfside, and the Town of Indian Creek. The Divisional Emergency Operations Center (EOC) facility houses staff and provides emergency planning, communication, and information receipt and dissemination services. During manmade or natural disasters, the ability to operate and provide communications from a protected and safe facility is of vital importance to the overall safety of the community and neighboring municipalities. The current Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) provides power during power failures and safeguards all communications equipment, computers and other vital electrical equipment. The current UPS is over five (5) years old; all batteries have reached the end of useful service life; and it is at its maximum capacity. The city is therefore seeking funds to replace the Uninterruptible Power Supply. Municipalities North Miami Safeguarding Availability of Potable Water Future Unfunded Project ,Other,Health,Pow er Failure This project is one of our future project.Grant Applied For 325,000.00 79 6 mos to 1 year Six remote raw water wells provide water to the city's Winson Water Plant at Sunkist Grove and supply the water necessary to operate the Water Plant at full capacity. This project will provide emergency power to the six remote raw water wells. These emergency generators will ensure that the remote water wells remain operational during power outages caused by storm events, and that the Plant will operate at full capacity. This will provide an uninterrupted source of potable water for North Miami residents as well as residents in surrounding water service areas. In addition, it will also ensure interconnectivity with other municipalities and service areas including the City of Opalocka, the City of North Miami Beach and Miami-Dade County. Municipalities North Miami Sanitary Sewer Backup Future Unfunded Project ,Power Failure Potential Grant Applied For 700,000.00 73 less than 6 months The city maintains and operates forty-five sanitary sewer lift stations. These lift stations, located throughout the city, vary in size and configuration and allow sanitary sewage to flow through a pressurized sewer main system. This sewer system infrastructure is monitored regularly to ensure it functions properly. In the event that any lift station ceases to operate due to power failure or malfunction, the entire system fails as required pressures cannot be maintained. Sanitary sewage, then backs up into the system eventually entering homes as inflow/outflow pressures are reversed. More than half of the city's forty-five sanitary sewer lift stations have high priority needs for generators. Ten lift stations are constructed with the capability to house permanent stationary generators. Six of these ten lift stations currently have emergency back up generators that are permanently affixed to the facility. The remaining four (H, B, C, & Breezeswept) require emergency generator back up to be installed. 78 of 93 244 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities North Miami Surge Resistance and Flood Mitigation at Keystone Point and Sans Souci Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge Future Project Grant Applied For 500,000.00 62 6 mos to 1 year The eastern boundary of North Miami borders Biscayne Bay for approximately three miles. Keystone Point and Sans Souci are the two subdivisions located along this eastern shoreline. There are five canal ends in Sans Souci currently in good condition. and are twenty-three canal ends in Keystone Point that have been repaired. When these subdivisions were developed, these canal ends were constructed to prevent soil erosion. The canal ends were not designed as seawalls and their structural integrity was not considered at the time. In 1998, the city received a Federal Emergency Management Agency grant to reconstruct nineteen of the twenty-eight seawalls. While two existing retaining walls do not need repairs, the remaining seven retaining walls need reconstruction to ensure structural integrity in the event of storm-related tidal surges. Approximately 50 homes will be affected if the remaining retaining walls are damaged by a tidal surge. In addition, any surface or subterranean deterioration to the existing retaining walls will adversely impact the structural integrity of the swales directly behind the seawalls and subsequently damage underground utilities in close proximity to the retaining walls. This project will prevent repetitive flooding, reduce damages to residential properties, decrease the number of recurring insurance claims, and provide uninterrupted telephone, water and sanitary sewer services to residents. Municipalities North Miami Utility Operation Center Surge Suppression System Future Unfunded Project ,Storm Surge,Power Failure Potential Identified Funding Source 20,000.00 66 less than 6 months The city maintains and operates forty-five sanitary sewer lift stations. Most lift stations are monitored from the city's operation center located at 1815 NE 150th Street through a supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system. All SCADA information is routed electronically through a server located at City Hall and relayed to either the operation center or the lift stations by way of radio. The SCADA system is susceptible to power fluctuations and spikes that damage equipment and disrupt communication between the operation center, City Hall and subsequently the lift stations. Surge suppression equipment will protect the system against damaging power fluctuations. eliminate the need for new equipment purchases and reduce personnel costs to manually control lift stations during storm events. Municipalities North Miami Beach Additional Outfalls for Eastern Shores Outfall pipes Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge CIP Identified Funding Source 100,000.00 0 6/1/2011 2023 The entire stormwater management system of this neighborhood, located on Maule Lakes and the Intracoastal waterways, just east of US-1, depends on the proper functioning of outfall pipes that discharge directly into the canal and Intracoastal waterways. There is a total of approximately 5,018 linear feet of existing outfall pipes in 44 locations in the neighborhood. The additional outfalls would allow for the rapid discharge of stormwater from the neighborhood. Municipalities North Miami Beach Aerial Pipe Crossings Funding Secured ,Other CIP Identified Funding Source 350,000.00 72 11/17/2014 2015 This project consist of the restoration of aerial pipe crossing for both City water mains and City sewer force mains. Municipalities North Miami Beach City of North Miami Beach EOC Future Unfunded Project ,Power Failure,Wind CIP Identified Funding Source 50,000.00 0 6/1/2011 2023 The City of North Miami Beach EOC is the Divisional EOC for North-eastern Miami-Dade County and serves the following cities: North Miami Beach, Golden Beach, Sunny Isles Beach, Aventura, North Bay Village, Bal Harbour Village, and Miami Gardens. In addition, several utility providers such as, FP&L, ATT, TECO Gas, and others are involved as well. The NMB EOC is responsible for a population of approximately, 180,000 residents. Critical structures under the NMB EOC purview include municipal drinking water supply, wastewater treatment, major corridor highways, railroad, natural gas and chemical plants as well as industrial warehouses. The NMB EOC activates to ensure proper response and recovery in the event of hurricanes, major flooding and other disasters, whether natural or man-made. In order to maintain its duties and to enhance its capabilities, the NMB EOC needs to upgrade its equipment such as computers, monitors, satellite communications, fax machines, printer and other required equipment. Municipalities North Miami Beach Clean and Improve Drainage Systems Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge N/A Identified Funding Source 90,000.00 0 6/1/2011 2023 Frequent cleaning and maintenance would improve the capacity and efficiency of the City's stormwater management system that would be required to dispose of large volume of stormwater produced during a severe storm event. These actions would benefit all residents of the City, as well as some areas of neighboring municipalities. The one-time cost to clean all of the City's catch basins is approximately, $90,000. While installing a new drainage system is approximately $1 million per 200 properties. Municipalities North Miami Beach Clean and Improve Drainage Systems Construction/Project Begun ,Flood CIP Identified Funding Source 428,400.00 83 11/17/2014 2015 Cleaning and improving the City's drainage system, including approximately 2,800 catch basins would help dispose of storm water and benefits all residents of the municipality, as well approximately 20 percent of Miami-Dade County. The cost to clean the catch basins once is $428, 400 (based on a cost of $153 per catch basin) and installing a new drainage system is approximately $1,000,000 per 200 residential lots. Municipalities North Miami Beach Clean and Improve the Drainage System Construction/Project Begun ,Flood/Storm Surge Capital Improvement Project Identified Funding Source 428,000.00 92 10/28/2015 FY16-FY20 Cleaning and improving the City's drainage system, including approximately 2,800 catch basins, would help dispose of stormwater and benefit all residents of the municipality, as well as approximately 20 percent of Miami-Dade County. Municipalities North Miami Beach Construct Injection Wells in Areas Prone to Flooding Future Unfunded Project flood CIP Identified Funding Source 0.00 0 6/1/2011 2023 Installing deep-well injection wells to reduce flooding would benefit approximately 30 percent of the City. The wells are allowed in areas where the salinity/TSS of the groundwater is 10,000 ppm or higher. Municipalities North Miami Beach Construct Storm Water System that may include Injection Wells in Areas Prone to Flooding Construction/Project Begun ,Flood CIP Identified Funding Source 120,000.00 77 11/17/2014 2015 Installing storm water system, including but not limited, to deep-well injection wells to reduce flooding would benefit approximately 30 percent of the City. This type of project is needed where localized flooding are observed and where such drainage design is applicable. Municipalities North Miami Beach Dead End Eliminations Funding Secured ,Flood CIP Identified Funding Source 42,000.00 80 11/17/2014 2015 This project consist of eliminations of dead end water mains City-wide. Lopped systems will be constructed to improve the City's water main system. Municipalities North Miami Beach Develop Evacuation Procedures & Contractual Future Unfunded Project All Hazard N/A Identified Funding Source 100,000.00 0 2023 In addition to posting evacuation routes on the Internet, the City would like to develop evacuation procedures to facilitate and expedite activities during an evacuation. This would include setting up contractual agreements with potential partners prior to a disaster so essential services (tree trimming, additional transportation, etc.) would be immediately available after a hurricane. The City's emergency response plan (ERP) procedures are outlined in the City's Unusual Occurrence Manual. Also, the City has signed contracts with five (5) contractors, including Crowder-Gulf, for post-disaster recovery services. Municipalities North Miami Beach Drainage in Alleyways Project in Planning Stage ,Flood Capital Improvement Project Identified Funding Source 50,000.00 81 10/29/2015 FY16-FY20 This project consists of the construction of exfiltration trenches/catch basins in alleyways City-wide. Municipalities North Miami Beach Drainage in Alleyways Funding Secured ,Flood/Storm Surge CIP Identified Funding Source 50,000.00 78 11/17/2014 2015 This project consists of the construction of exfiltration trenches/catch basins in alleyways city-wide. Municipalities North Miami Beach Eastern Shores Drainage Repair/Replacement Construction/Project Begun ,Flood CIP Identified Funding Source 450,000.00 78 11/17/2014 2015 This project consist of the repair and replacement of damaged existing drainage in the Eastern Shores neighborhood. Municipalities North Miami Beach Eastern Shores Outfall Retrofit Design Project Project in Planning Stage ,Flood Capital Improvement Project scheduled for FY17. Identified Funding Source 300,000.00 87 10/28/2015 FY2017 The entire stormwater system of this neighborhood, Eastern Shores located east of US1 depends on the proper functioning of the outfall pipes that discharge in the canal and Intracoastal. There is approximately 5,018 linear feet of existing outfall pipes in 44 locations in the neighborhood of Eastern Shores and Western Eastern Shores. Most of the outfall pipes were installed in the early 1960s up to the late 1970s. There pipes have deteriorated and are collapsing due to age and rusts caused by salinity of the ground water in the area. Municipalities North Miami Beach Emergency Generators for Norwood Water Treatment Plant Project in Planning Stage ,Power Failure Capital Improvement Project Identified Funding Source 1,550,000.00 84 10/29/2015 FY16-FY20 This project consist of the installation of emergency back-up power for the Norwood Water Treatment expansion project. Emergency standby power facilities would be at the Norwood WTP to handle the expanded facilities and on-site wells, and additional emergency standby facilities would be provided at the Parkway Elementary School site to supply standby power for the new off-site Biscayne Aquifer wells. 79 of 93 245 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities North Miami Beach Establish a Community Outreach Program & Public Information Campaign Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge N/A Identified Funding Source 500,000.00 0 6/1/2011 2023 Post evacuation routes on the City's website.City-sponsored Flood Awareness Week to partner with other agencies (and community groups) and to provide information about flood risk potential, safety tips, and steps to take in a flood.Create a children's coloring book as an interagency initiative (can also be placed on our website).Publish a floodplain or pre-disaster preparedness brochure and post on website.Send flood related articles in utility bills.Broadcast on our local cable channel FEMA's �Best Build� video & other local flood plain videos.Publish a Flood safety section in the yellow pages.Offer flood safety and hazard information recording on the city's phone system.Develop an educational program for local schools.Sponsor a �Name the Park� contest as an organized community project/event. Establish a flood audit program to serve as a pre-disaster vulnerability and planning effort. Maintain elevation certificate data on our website and a link to FEMA's website. Provide material on how to select a qualified contractor and one for the property owner's recourse if dissatisfied with a contractor's performance. Municipalities North Miami Beach Establish Additional Hurricane Shelters Future Unfunded Project All Hazard CIP Identified Funding Source 0.00 0 6/1/2011 2023 Due to the geographic location of the City and its surrounding communities, there is a high demand for shelter space especially during hurricanes classified as Category 2 and higher. Residents of both, the City and the surrounding communities, depend on the City to provide shelter space in the event of a disaster. The current shelters are inadequate to accommodate the large numbers of people who would require these services. Establishing additional shelters throughout the City would provide significant benefits and peace of mind to its residents. Municipalities North Miami Beach Establishment of Emergency Operations Center Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge,Wind Capital Improvement Project Identified Funding Source 385,000.00 86 10/29/2015 FY16-FY20 The proposal is to upgrade the power generating capacity of the Carter Tyree Public Service Operation Center to be self- sustaining during and after a disaster. This facility was constructed in 1997 to withstand winds exceeding 180 MPH but lacks the power generation capacity to power crucial functions that operate from this facility. This is the facility where, emergency preparedness and disaster recovery crews are headquartered. The scope of the work would include an upgraded generator, conservation of empty "bunker" room into command center, installation of radio and communication equipment, enhancement of onsite fueling station and installation of remote fueling facility at Water Plant. Municipalities North Miami Beach Extend Sanitary Sewer System/Remove Septic Tank Systems Future Unfunded Project flood CIP Identified Funding Source 0.00 0 6/1/2011 2023 Flooding in areas with septic tank systems poses significant environmental and health risks to the immediate residents and to the community at large because flooded septic systems contaminate both groundwater and surface water. Extending the sanitary sewer system to residents currently utilizing septic systems would benefit approximately 25% of the residents of the City and reduce the chances of ground- and surface-water contamination during a severe storm event. Municipalities North Miami Beach Fire Flow Improvements Funding Secured ,Other CIP Identified Funding Source 320,000.00 81 11/17/2014 2015 This project consists of making improvements to the City's water main system to improve fire flow. Municipalities North Miami Beach Force Main Installations and Lift Stations Rehabilitations Funding Secured ,Other CIP Identified Funding Source 125,000.00 51 11/17/2014 2015 This project consists of the rehabilitations of existing City owned sewage lift stations and the construction of any new force mains required during the rehabs. Municipalities North Miami Beach GIS Application for Storm Water System Future Unfunded Project ,Other CIP Identified Funding Source 0.00 72 11/17/2014 2015 This project consists of the implementation of a GIS system for the City's storm water system. Municipalities North Miami Beach Highland Village Drainage Improvements Future Unfunded Project flood CIP Identified Funding Source 0.00 0 6/1/2011 2023 This project consists of the installation of 10 deep injection wells, additional storm drainage structures, and road re-surfacing throughout the Highland community. This project will significantly reduce flooding in the area and make it safe for residents to travel. Municipalities North Miami Beach Highland Village Drainage Improvements and Pump Stations Future Unfunded Project ,Other CIP Identified Funding Source 0.00 76 11/17/2014 2015 This project consist of various drainage improvements in the Highland Village subdivision. Also included within this project is the construction of a pump station for well injection. Municipalities North Miami Beach Highland Village Stormwater Improvement Project in Planning Stage ,Flood Capital Improvement Project scheduled for FY17 Identified Funding Source 200,000.00 79 10/28/2015 FY 2017 The project consist of various drainage improvements in the Highland Village subdivision. Municipalities North Miami Beach Inflow and Infiltration Prevention Funding Secured ,Other CIP Identified Funding Source 250,000.00 66 11/17/2014 2015 This project consists of preventing inflow and infiltration into the City's gravity sewer mains. Municipalities North Miami Beach Injection Well Construction Project in Planning Stage ,Flood Capital Improvement Project Identified Funding Source 150,000.00 83 10/28/2015 FY16-FY20 Installing stormwater system, including but not limited, to deep-well injection wells to reduce flooding would benefit approximately 30 percent of the City. This type of project is needed where localized flooding is observed and where such drainage design is applicable. Municipalities North Miami Beach Install Additional Storm Water Basins or Increase Existing Basins Construction/Project Begun ,Flood CIP Identified Funding Source 60,000.00 86 11/17/2014 2015 Installing additional storm water management basins will help the city reduce the potential for flooding after storms and heavy rains. Installation of additional basins will affect the entire municipality, as well about of Miami-Dade County. Municipalities North Miami Beach Install Additional Stormwater Basins Project in Planning Stage ,Flood Capital Improvement Project Identified Funding Source 60,000.00 90 10/28/2015 FY16-FY20 Installing additional stormwater management basins will help the City reduce the potential for flooding after storms and heavy rains. Installation of additional basins will affect the entire municipality, as well about 20 percent of Miami-Dade County. Municipalities North Miami Beach Install Additional Stormwater Catch Basins. Future Unfunded Project flood CIP Identified Funding Source 0.00 0 6/1/2011 2023 The installing additional catch basins will help the City to reduce the potential for flooding after major storm and rain events. The installation of additional catch basins will also greatly affect the ability of the storm drainage system to quickly convey stormwater from roadways and adjoining properties. The entire City will benefit from this improvement as well as portions of neighboring municipalities. Municipalities North Miami Beach Leak Detection Services Funding Secured ,Flood/Storm Surge CIP Identified Funding Source 50,000.00 82 11/17/2014 2015 This project consist of locating and repair existing leaks within the City's watermain system City-Wide. Municipalities North Miami Beach Miami Drive Roadway Improvements Future Unfunded Project flood N/A Identified Funding Source 0.00 0 6/1/2011 2023 This project consists of the installation of a French Drain System, swale improvement and road re-surfacing of Miami Dr., between NE 18th Ave. and NE 19th Ave. Municipalities North Miami Beach Miami Industrial District Drainage & Roadway Improvements Project in Planning Stage ,Flood Capital Improvement Project Identified Funding Source 800,000.00 78 10/29/2015 FY16-FY20 This project consist of the installation of stormwater system, French drains, road resurfacing, curbing, and landscape. Municipalities North Miami Beach Miami Industrial District Drainage and Roadway Improvement Construction/Project Begun ,Flood CIP Identified Funding Source 800,000.00 71 11/17/2014 2015 This project consists of the installation of a storm water system. road resurfacing, curbing, and landscape. Municipalities North Miami Beach NE 10th Ave/NE 159th Street and NMB Blvd. Project in Planning Stage ,Other Capital Improvement Project Identified Funding Source 300,000.00 59 10/29/2015 FY16-FY20 This project consist of street and Roadway improvements. This will make significant drainage improvements. Municipalities North Miami Beach NE 10th Avenue between NE 159th Street and NMB Blvd. Future Unfunded Project ,Other CIP Identified Funding Source 0.00 77 11/17/2014 2015 This project consist of roadway improvements that will be making significant drainage enhancements. Municipalities North Miami Beach NE 161 Street Drainage Improvements Future Unfunded Project flood N/A Identified Funding Source 0.00 0 6/1/2011 2023 This project consists of the installation of a French Drain System, swale improvement and road re-surfacing of NE 161 St., between NE 13th Ave. and NE 15th Ave. Municipalities North Miami Beach NE 161st Street Roadway and Drainage Improvements Project in Planning Stage ,Flood Capital Improvement Projects Identified Funding Source 400,000.00 77 10/29/2015 FY16-FY20 This project consist of roadway improvements. This will include making significant drainage improvements. 80 of 93 246 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities North Miami Beach NE 161st Street Roadway and Drainage Improvements Future Unfunded Project ,Other CIP Identified Funding Source 0.00 57 11/17/2014 2015 This project consists of roadway improvements that will help enhance anticipated drainage issues. Municipalities North Miami Beach NE 162 Street Roadway Improvements Future Unfunded Project flood N/A Identified Funding Source 0.00 0 6/1/2011 2023 This project consists of the installation of a French Drain System, swale improvement and road re-surfacing of NE 162 St., between NE 12th Ave. and NE 16th Ave. Municipalities North Miami Beach NE 165 Street Roadway Improvements Future Unfunded Project flood N/A Identified Funding Source 0.00 0 6/1/2011 2023 This project consists of the installation of a French Drain System, swale improvement and road re-surfacing of NE 165 St., between NE 16th Ave. and NE 15th Ave. Municipalities North Miami Beach NE 172 Street Drainage Improvement Future Unfunded Project flood CIP Identified Funding Source 0.00 0 6/1/2011 2023 This project consists of the installation of five (5) deep injection wells, catch basins and drainage pipes, stormwater pump station, and road resurfacing. This project will significantly reduce flooding in the area of the City located between NE 170 St. West Dixie Highway and NE 22 Ave. and NE 172 St. Municipalities North Miami Beach NE 172nd Drainage Improvement 75% complete ,Flood Capital Improvement Project Funding Secured 17,916.92 72 10/29/2015 FY16-FY20 This project consist of the installation of approved pre-treatment devices a French drain, stormwater pumping station, outfall pipe modification, deep injection wells, and road resurfacing. This project will significantly reduce flooding in the area and make it safe for residents to travel. Municipalities North Miami Beach NE 172nd Street Drainage Improvement Construction/Project Begun ,Flood CIP Identified Funding Source 1,791,692.00 77 11/17/2014 2015 This project consist of installation of approved pre-treatment devices, storm water pumping station, outfall pipe modification, deep injection wells, and road resurfacing. This project will significantly reduce flooding in the area and make it safe for residents to travel. Municipalities North Miami Beach NE 19 Avenue Roadway Improvements Future Unfunded Project flood N/A Identified Funding Source 0.00 0 6/1/2011 2023 This project consists of the installation of a drainage system, swale improvement and road re-surfacing of NE 19 Ave., between NE 163rd St. and NE 171st St. Municipalities North Miami Beach NE 19th Avenue Business District Sewering Future Unfunded Project ,Flood CIP Identified Funding Source 0.00 63 11/17/2014 2015 This project consists of the construction of positive sewer systems for the NE 19th Avenue Business District. These systems will replace existing septic systems. Municipalities North Miami Beach Norwood Water Treatment Plant Stormwater Retension Ponds Project in Planning Stage ,Flood Capital Improvement Project Identified Funding Source 600,000.00 81 10/29/2015 FY16-FY20 The City of North Miami Beach is currently undergoing a major Norwood-Oeffler Water Plant Expansion Program. Approximately 15 million gallons per day (MGD) membrane treatment system will be added to the current 16 MGD lime softening process. Due to increased pervious areas, the current storm system needs to be expanded. However, due to well field protection requirements and site limitations, the existing exfiltration system cannot be expanded. To achieve the goals of the stormwater management and protection of public water supply wells, the City had to construct three dry stormwater retention ponds and associated piping system. The total pond area is approximately 0.8 acre. The system also includes 550 ft. of 18-inch, 550 ft. of 24 inch, and more than 1000 ft. of 36-inch fiber reinforced concrete pipe, and associated about 30 inlet or manhole structures. Municipalities North Miami Beach Perform Free Hurricane Inspections for City Residents Future Unfunded Project wind CIP Identified Funding Source 0.00 0 6/1/2011 2023 By performing free hurricane inspections for buildings located within the City limits, the City would help to reduce the potential for damages to property as well as to educate the public on issues related to hurricane and storm safety, evacuation routes, and other essential topics. This project has the potential to benefit 100 percent of the properties located within the City; however, the degree of success will depend on the number of properties that participate in the program. To foster larger participation, the City would offer incentives to property owners. Municipalities North Miami Beach Proactive Hurricane Tree Trimming Project in Planning Stage ,Other Capital Improvement Project Identified Funding Source 150,000.00 50 10/29/2015 FY16-FY20 The proposal is for funding of tree trimming services to properly prune and maintain over 16,000 trees throughout the City of North Miami Beach. Properly pruning and thinning of tree canopy would be essentially beneficial in minimizing damage to utilities, building structures, and automobiles as a result of drowned trees during severe storm systems. Municipalities North Miami Beach Pro-active Hurricane Tree Trimming and Pruning Future Unfunded Project wind/wild fire CIP Identified Funding Source 0.00 0 6/1/2011 2023 This project involves tree trimming services to properly prune and maintain over 6,000 trees throughout the City of North Miami Beach. Trees are considered part of the City's infrastructure; they require regular hurricane pruning maintenance. The City Forester recommends trimming and/or removing those trees that pose a threat or public danger in the event of a storm such as a hurricane. Trees along drainage canals and designated evacuation routes are of particular importance. The proper pruning and thinning of trees canopy would minimize property and utility damages that would be caused by trees downed during severe storm events. Tree trimming services can be performed by a contractor at an estimated cost of $150,000 annually. Alternatively, the same services may be accomplished with an annual operating cost of $60,000, if the City were to purchase a bucket truck, at a cost of $180,000 and staff it with a two-person crew. Municipalities North Miami Beach Provide Disaster Training for Public Works Employee Future Unfunded Project All Hazard CIP Identified Funding Source 0.00 0 6/1/2011 2023 By providing disaster training for employees of the Department of Public Services prior to a disaster, the City would have at its disposal, trained, knowledgeable and capable personnel, who could manage scenarios associated with disasters in a more efficient and effective manner. Consequently, costs and delays often associated with post-disasters periods would be significantly reduced. Municipalities North Miami Beach Public Facilities Repair Future Unfunded Project wind N/A Identified Funding Source 0.00 0 6/1/2011 2023 This project consists of the repair and strengthening of roofs, windows and other structural elements of key City-owned facilities. Municipalities North Miami Beach Pump Replacements Funding Secured ,Flood CIP Identified Funding Source 165,000.00 11 11/17/2014 2015 The project consists of the replacement of sewage lift station pumps on as needed basins. Municipalities North Miami Beach Rehabilitation of NE 172 Street Stormwater Pump Station Project in Planning Stage ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge CIP Identified Funding Source 199,250.00 88 8/25/2016 1 year Rehabilitation of NE 172 Street Stormwater Pump Station. Municipalities North Miami Beach Remove Australian Pines within City Limits Future Unfunded Project wild fire, wind CIP Identified Funding Source 0.00 0 6/1/2011 2023 Australian pines have shallow root structures that make the trees susceptible to uprooting in high winds and heavy storms. Removing these trees would mitigate future damages caused by falling trees and help to reduce the amount of debris present after a storm. This project would benefit the City. Municipalities North Miami Beach Renovation of Eastern Shores Outfall pipes Future Unfunded Project flood CIP Identified Funding Source 0.00 0 6/1/2011 2023 The entire stormwater management system of this neighborhood, located on Maule Lakes and the Intracoastal waterways, just east of US-1, depends on the proper functioning of outfall pipes that discharge directly into the canal and Intracoastal waterways. There is a total of approximately 5,018 linear feet of existing outfall pipes in 44 locations in the neighborhood. The majority of these outfall pipes were installed in the early 1960's and up to the late 1970's. The pipes have since deteriorated and in some cases are collapsing due to age and due to exposure to saline soil and groundwater in the area. Damaged outfalls need to be replaced and/or repaired. Municipalities North Miami Beach Renovation of Eastern Shores Outfall Pipes Construction/Project Begun ,Flood CIP Identified Funding Source 550,000.00 75 11/17/2014 2015 The entire storm water system of the Eastern Shores neighborhood is located east of US1 and depends on the proper functioning of the outfall pipes that discharge in the canal and Intercoastal. There is a total of approximately 5,018 linear feet of existing outfall pipes in 44 locations in the neighborhood of Eastern Shores and Western Eastern Shores. Most of these outfall pipes were installed in the early 1960s up to the late 1970s and as a result, these pipes have deteriorated and are collapsing due to age and rust caused by salinity of the ground water in the area. Municipalities North Miami Beach Roadway Improvements Funding Secured ,Other CIP Identified Funding Source 327,000.00 56 11/17/2014 2015 This project consist of the paving, resurfacing, and curb construction along the drainage improvements on City-Wide and City roads. 81 of 93 247 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities North Miami Beach Sanitary Sewer System/Remove Septic Tanks Project in Planning Stage ,Flood Capital Improvement Project Identified Funding Source 100,000.00 81 10/28/2015 FY16-FY20 Flooding in areas with septic tank systems poses significant environmental and health risks to the immediate residents and the community at large because flooded septic systems have the potential to contaminate both groundwater and surface water. Extending the sanitary sewer system to residents currently utilizing septic systems would benefit approximately 25% of the City of North Miami Beach. Municipalities North Miami Beach Storm Water Improvement City-Wide Funding Secured ,Flood CIP Identified Funding Source 336,885.00 69 11/17/2014 2015 This project consists of design and construction of various storm water improvements City-wide. This will consist of exfiltration trenches and well injection system. Municipalities North Miami Beach Storm Water Master Plan Future Unfunded Project ,Flood CIP Identified Funding Source 0.00 89 11/17/2014 2015 This project consists of preparing a current update to the City's Storm Water Master Plan Municipalities North Miami Beach Storm Water Pump Replacement Program Funding Secured ,Flood CIP Identified Funding Source 50,000.00 63 11/17/2014 2015 This project consists of the replacement of existing storm water pumps on a needed basis. Municipalities North Miami Beach Storm Water Pump Replacement Program Project in Planning Stage ,Flood Capital Improvement Project Identified Funding Source 50,000.00 87 10/29/2015 FY16-FY20 The project consist of the replacement of existing storm water pumps on an as needed basis. Municipalities North Miami Beach Stormwater Improvements City-wide Project in Planning Stage ,Flood Capital Improvement Project Identified Funding Source 340,000.00 82 10/29/2015 FY16-FY20 The project consist of design and construction of various storm water improvements City-wide. This will consist of the replacement of existing storm water pumps on a needed basis. Municipalities North Miami Beach Stormwater Master Plan Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge,Sea Level Rise Capital Improvement Project Identified Funding Source 400,000.00 87 10/28/2015 FY16-FY20 The City has hired consultants to access the entire storm system throughout the City's jurisdiction and such study will include the modeling under different storm scenarios. The consulting firm will prepare once the required data is collected and available a Master Plan that will clearly define the problem areas. Some of these areas are already well known and solutions have been implemented or will become part of the CIP plan in the near future. However, the Master Plan will provide a more structured approach to determining the priority of the different conceived projects. Municipalities North Miami Beach Telephone System Replacement For City Hall and Police Department. Future Unfunded Project communication failure N/A Identified Funding Source 0.00 0 6/1/2011 2023 This project consists of a new digital telephone system to provide seamless communication between the City's Police Dept., City Hall and the residents of the City. Municipalities North Miami Beach Transmission Main Pipe Evaluation and Testing Funding Secured ,Other CIP Identified Funding Source 25,000.00 74 11/17/2014 2015 This project consist of the evaluation and testing of large diameter water mains City-wide. Municipalities North Miami Beach Trenchless Pipe Replacements Funding Secured ,Flood CIP Identified Funding Source 325,000.00 78 11/17/2014 2015 This project consists of the replacement of various water mains and sewer force mains through underground boring methods. Municipalities North Miami Beach Well Field Stormwater System Improvement Project in Planning Stage ,Flood Capital Improvement Project Identified Funding Source 29,000.00 80 10/29/2015 FY16-FY20 In order to protect public water supply wells #13 and #19 from contamination, the City needs to modify the stormwater system previously constructed in the vicinity of the wells. Approximately 300 ft. of 30-inch French drain needs to be removed and replaced with solid pipes. The associated inlets need to be modified as well. Municipalities North Miami Beach West Dixie Highway Industrial District Drainage & Roadway Improvement Future Unfunded Project ,Flood N/A Identified Funding Source 0.00 0 6/1/2011 2023 This project consists of the installation of a French Drain system, road resurfacing, curbing and landscape on the roadways located between NE 151 St., NE 154 St., West Dixie Hwy. and the FEC railroad tracks. Municipalities North Miami Beach West Dixie Hwy between NE 151 Street and NE 154th Street Future Unfunded Project ,Other CIP Identified Funding Source 0.00 51 11/17/2014 2015 This project consist of roadway improvements that are cohesive to current drainage enhancements. Municipalities Opa Locka 141St Roadway & Drainage Improvements Other ,Flood,Health HMGP Identified Funding Source 300,000.00 0 12/24/2013 2 years Municipalities Opa Locka NW 147th Street Drainage Other ,Flood,Health,Win d,Flood/Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 3,698,458.52 0 4/8/2014 2 years Drainage project along NW 147 Street Municipalities Opa Locka Sherbondy Village - Emergency Shelter Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Health,Pow er Failure,Wind If funded through the Hazard Mitigation Grant program, the City's match will be budgeted for in the FY 19 Budget. Identified Funding Source 600,000.00 78 12/22/2017 1 year Scope of Project to Upgrade Sherbondy Village: In an effort to bring this facility into compliance with the requirements of a public disaster shelter, the following items must be addressed: • Upgrade electrical transfer switch to a single automated unit. • Outfit a designated area to serve as the city Emergency Operations Center EOC. • Install additional showers and restroom facilities. • Pave, mark, and illuminate designated parking area. These upgrades will cost approximately $600,000. Municipalities Opa Locka Zone 1 & 2 Roads (NW 38th Ave., NW 38th Court, NW 42nd Ave., NW 45th Ave., NW 46th Ave., NW 47th Ave., NW 128th St., NW 132nd St., NW 133rd St., NW 135th St., NW 32nd Ave., NW 38th Court, Alexandria Drive, Port Said Road, NW 132nd Terrance, NW 132nd St., NW 135 St.) ) Project in Planning Stage ,Flood,Health The City will be seeking State Revolving Loan from the Department of Environmental Protection. Within the FY 18 Adopted Budget, the City has allocated $700 K to be used as a mechanism to draw down the State Revolving Loan funds. Identified Funding Source 16,000,000.00 84 12/15/2017 2 years to completion Project Description: This project consist of drinking water, waste water, and storm water infrastructure improvements. The total project cost is estimated at $16,125,882 . Drinking Water – To include the replacement of the existing deteriorated potable water system consisting of mainline piping, valves, service connections, water service conversions, tees and various appurtenances required for successful installation and operations in accordance with applicable jurisdictional standards and regulations. These improvements will provide for fire flow protection and operations, and improve the system pressure. Waste Water – To include the replacement, repair and/or lining of the existing deteriorated wastewater system consisting of mainline piping, valves, manholes, laterals, wyes, tees. The project scope will include the SCADA system used to monitor the four (4) pump stations, as well. Storm Water – To include the installation of new storm water system infrastructure consisting of storm drain piping, cross drain piping, catch basins, manholes, curb inlets, end walls, outfall pipes, pavements, sidewalks, ditch bottom inlets, control structures, rip raps, and hydrodynamic separation structures. 82 of 93 248 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Opa Locka Zone 6 Roads (141 NW St., 139 NW St., 146 NW St., 149 NW St., 147 NW St., Atlantic Ave., Superior Ave., York St., NW 140th St., NW 140th Terrance, Burlington St., NW 143rd St., Ali-Baba Blvd., Sesame St., NW 149th St., NW 150th St., NW 26th Ave., NW 24th Ave., NW 23rd Ave., NW 22nd Place, NW 23rd Place, NW 23rd Court, NW 27th Ave., NW 25th Ave., NW 24th Court, Frontage Road, NW 25th Court, NW 131st St., LS #2, LS #4, LS #5, LS #8)) Project in Planning Stage ,Flood,Health The City has budgeted $600 K in its FY 2018 Adopted Budget to be used as a mechanism to draw down future State Revolving Loans from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. The State Revolving Loans will be used as the match. Identified Funding Source 6,000,000.00 84 12/15/2017 2 years to completion Project Description: This project consist of drinking water, waste water, and storm water infrastructure improvements. The total project cost is estimated at $6,229,374 . Drinking Water – To include the replacement of the existing deteriorated potable water system consisting of mainline piping, valves, service connections, water service conversions, tees and various appurtenances required for successful installation and operations in accordance with applicable jurisdictional standards and regulations. These improvements will provide for fire flow protection and operations, and improve the system pressure. Waste Water – To include the replacement, repair and/or lining of the existing deteriorated wastewater system consisting of mainline piping, valves, manholes, laterals, wyes, tees. The project scope will include the SCADA system used to monitor the four (4) pump stations, as well. Storm Water – To include the installation of new storm water system infrastructure consisting of storm drain piping, cross drain piping, catch basins, manholes, curb inlets, end walls, outfall pipes, pavements, sidewalks, ditch bottom inlets, control structures, rip raps, and hydrodynamic separation structures. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Acquire a High Water Vehicle Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge No funding source identified for this project 50,000.00 68 1/2/2014 < 2 years The village needs a vehicle capable of movement through flooded areas to assist citizens in distress. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Alternative lighting for pathway security Other ,Flood/Storm Surge Hazard Mitigation Grant Program through FEMA Identified Funding Source 40,000.00 70 11/21/2017 less than 6 months 70 of our 83 security pathway lights have been damaged due to storm surge. We are interested in pursuing alternative lighting styles and options by raising the lights or purchasing water resistant lighting fixtures. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Canal and Waterway Maintenance Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge,Sea Level Rise Stormwater Utility - Palmetto Bay Stormwater Utility - Miami Dade County SFWMD Identified Funding Source 250,000.00 60 12/27/2013 less than 6 months Clean and maintain including exotic weed control, dredge when and where needed, clear banks of potential debris, and stabilize banks to prevent erosion. Clean canals allow better control of water levels, which greatly improves storm water management and the drainage system. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Canal Bank Erosion Protection Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge,Other,Flood Potential funding from SFWMD 2,500,000.00 62 12/27/2013 2 years or more Design and construct erosion protection structures and bank stabilization projects along village canals which are vulnerable to bank erosion due to storm surge or inland flooding. This project includes the construction of erosion control structures such as riprap or HDPE geotextile systems, clearing of undesirable debris, trees, predominantly Australian pines and ficus, located in close proximity to canal bank. These trees are prone to falling during a severe windstorm or hurricane causing flow obstructions as well as damage to the canal bank resulting in increased erosion. We must also schedule regular maintenance of Village canals to restore flow. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Clean Drainage System Other Flood/Storm Surge Stormwter Utility Special Revenue Identified Funding Source 125,200.00 65 1/2/2014 annually Clean and flush all sediment and debris from catch basins, pipe and exfiltration trench. Existing catch basins should be modified or reconstrcuted as required to provide sediment traps and pollution retardant baffles to protect the french drains and outfalls. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Debris Storage Area Future Unfunded Project Other Unidentified funding source at this time.40,000.00 52 1/2/2014 less than 2 years Develop/Identify an area for emergency management debris removal and storage, including construction of infrastructure to reach site.This effort should reduce demands on the local government and facilitate recovery after the event. This is a key item since both the Village and the County are responsible for various city services. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Downtown Redevelopment 25% complete Wind,Flood/Storm Surge County GOB Street Sign Bond General Funds Grant Awarded 12,440,000.00 43 1/2/2014 > 1 year The area known as the Franjo Triangle and Island district, South of SW 168th ST, North of SW 184th ST, East of South Bound US1, and West of SW 94th AVE is in the planning stages of a complete redevelopment including roadway, buildings and infrastructure. The purpose is to create a walkable, livable downtown district that is confined to the current commercial area surrounding US1, to create a sense of community and a sense of place, to expand services to Village residents, to enhance quality of life, and to serve as economic engine for Village and diversify revenue and shift the tax burden from the residential to the commercial sector. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Drainage Improvements Sub-Basin 43 Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Storm Surge Unidentified source of funding for this projects with the exception of Stormwater Utility Revenue 940,000.00 69 12/29/2016 more than 4 years The proposed improvements will result in a significant reduction in the pollutant load contribution from this sub-basin to the Biscayne Aquifer for three major pollutants. Clean and flush sediment and debris from existing catch basins and pipes and adjust catch basin elevations and locations to minimize accumulation of sediment and debris. Install additional infrastructure. Existing catch basins should be modified or reconstructed as required to provide sediment traps (sumps) and pollution retardant baffles to protect the exfiltration trench. Constructing additional catch basins, manholes, culverts, and exfiltration trench is recommended to interconnect the catch basins. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Drainage Improvements - SW 87 AVE (from SW 168 ST to SW 184 ST)50% complete ,Flood/Storm Surge Miami-Dade County Stormwater Utility Revenue Identified Funding Source 1,500,000.00 65 12/27/2013 > than one year The drainage system is undersized and its existing drainage system consists of several isolated small exfiltration systems at low points in the roadway. Construct additional catch basins and exfiltration trench at low points in the roadway swales of the sub- basin and connect to drainage wells. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Drainage Improvements for Sub-Basin # 11 Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge Unidentified funding source 890,000.00 64 12/30/2013 > 4 year Drainage sub-basin # 11 located South of SW 152 ST. North of SW 156 ST, East of US 1, West of SW 89 AVE. The sub-basin consists of approximately 48.3 acres of existing detached single family residential and commercial development. Construct additional catch basins and exfiltration trench at low points in the roadway swales of the sub-basin and connect to drainage wells. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Drainage Improvements for Sub-Basin # 12 Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge (Select)65,000.00 70 12/26/2013 less than 6 months Drainage sub-basin # 12 located South of SW 168 ST. North of SW 171 ST, East of SW 75 AVE, West of OLD CUTLER RD. The sub- basin consists of approximately 25.3 acres of existing detached single family residential development with approximately 6,600 linear feet of roadway. Construct additional catch basins and exfiltration trench at low points in the roadway swales of the sub- basin and connect to drainage wells. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Drainage Improvements for Sub-Basin #41 Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge Unidentified funding source. Identified Funding Source 966,000.00 72 11/29/2017 3-6 months Drainage Sub-basin #41 is located south of SW 173rd Street, north of SW 174th Street, west of Old Cutler Road, and east of SW 77th Avenue. Drainage Sub-basin #41 is part of the C100-C-20 Miami-Dade County basin. The sub-basin consists of approximately 30.13 acres of existing detached single-family residential development with approximately 4,560 linear feet of roadway. Constructing additional catch basins, manholes, culverts, and exfiltration trench is recommended to interconnect the catch basins. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Drainage Improvements for Sub-Basin #42 Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge Unidentified funding source at this time. Identified Funding Source 724,500.00 77 11/29/2017 3-6 months Drainage sub-basin 42 is located south of SW 168th Street (Richmond Drive), north of SW 171st Street, west of SW 76th Avenue, and east of SW 77th Avenue Palmetto Road). Drainage sub-basin 42 is part of the C100C-E-11 Miami-Dade County basin. The sub-basin consists of approximately 17.37 acres of existing detached single-family residential development with approximately 3,160 linear feet of roadway. Constructing additional catch basins, manholes, culverts, and exfiltration trench is recommended to interconnect the catch basins. 83 of 93 249 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Palmetto Bay Drainage Improvements for Sub-Basin #44 Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge Unidentified funding source at this time. Identified Funding Source 1,150,000.00 81 11/29/2017 3-6 months Drainage sub-basin #44 is located south of SW 164th Street, north of SW 166th Street, west of SW 72nd Avenue, and east of SW 77th Avenue (Palmetto Road). Drainage sub-basin #44 is part of the C100C-E-10 Miami-Dade County basin. The sub-basin consists of approximately 34.01 acres of existing detached single-family residential development with approximately 7,070 linear feet of roadway. Existing catch basins should be modified or reconstructed as required to provide sediment traps (sumps) and pollution retardant baffles to protect the exfiltration trench. Constructing additional catch basins, manholes, culverts, and exfiltration trench is recommended to interconnect the catch basins. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Drainage Improvements Sub-Basin 57/96 Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Storm Surge Unidentified funding source with the exception of Stormwater Utility Revenue. 601,450.00 69 12/29/2016 5 years or greater Proposed improvements will result in a significant reduction in the pollutant load contribution from this sub-basin to the Biscayne Aquifer for three major pollutants.Clean and flush all sediment and debris from existing catch basins and pipes and adjust catch basin elevations and locations to minimize accumulation of sediment and debris. Install additional infrastructure. Existing catch basins should be modified or reconstructed as required to provide sediment traps (sumps) and pollution retardant baffles to protect the exfiltration trench. Constructing additional catch basins, manholes, culverts, and exfiltration trench is recommended to interconnect the catch basins. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Drainage Improvements to Sub-Basin #39 Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge SFWMD Identified Funding Source 770,500.00 85 11/29/2017 3-6 months Drainage Sub-basin #39 is located south of SW 170th Terrace, north of SW 173rd Street, west of Old Cutler Road, and east of SW 77th Avenue. Drainage Sub-basin #39 is part of the C-100C-E-11 Miami-Dade County basin. The Sub-basin consists of approximately 21.22 acres of existing detached single-family residential development with approximately 3,260 linear feet of roadway. Constructing additional catch basins, manholes, culverts and exfiltration trench is recommended to interconnect the catch basins. this Sub-basin has the possibility of a new outfall connection as well. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Emergency Portable Stormwater Pumps Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge,Sea Level Rise Unidentified 200,000.00 69 12/27/2013 less than 2 years The easternmost boundary of the Village borders Biscayne Bay for approximately 3.4 miles. There are several low lying areas adjacent to Biscayne Bay that flood during heavy rain events and major storm events. The Village is seeking funds to purchase portable emergency pumps to assist in the discharge of stormwater runoff. These portable stormwater pumps will help prevent repetitive flooding, reduce damages to residential properties, and decrease the number of recurring insurance claims. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Emergency Warning Phone Call System (Reverse 911) Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge,Health,Pow er Failure,Sea Level Rise,Security Breach,Technologi cal Disruption,Wild Fire,Wind,Other Unidentified funding source 100,000.00 80 12/30/2013 less than 2 years Install a computerized telephone call system to call each phone to indicate emergency operation warnings. The system will notify all Village residents prior to or during an emergency situation.. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Facility Hardening & Roof Replacement for Recreational Building at Coral Reef Park Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge,Wind Potential grant with the Department of Environmental Protection Agency Grant Applied For 2,000,000.00 77 1/9/2014 2017 - 2018 In addition to providing recreational services to a large number of people on a daily basis, the Recreation Building at Coral Reef Park also serves as a secondary EOC location for the Village of Palmetto Bay. The 2,000 SF structure was built in 1978 and does not currently meet building code requirements for the South Florida area. There have been no significant updates made to the building since it was first constructed. Recent inspections of the facility show that its roof’s useful lifetime has been exceeded and requires full replacement. The main structural glue-laminated beam is rotting and, over time, has separated from the supporting structural walls. New wood soffits are also needed and truss connections must be re-strapped. The repairs are extremely critical. The building, as it stands now, is at great risk of caving-in in the event of even a small hurricane. In addition to the roof, the building envelope must be hardened to withstand the impact of heavy storm winds and flying debris. All existing exterior windows and doors must be replaced with hurricane-approved ones, all masonry corners must be reinforced and the electrical and plumbing systems must be upgraded. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Flood Zone Data Maintenance: GIS System 50% complete ,Flood/Storm Surge,Other General Funds Funding Secured 100,000.00 70 12/30/2013 < 4 year This project will fund the creation of a GIS system to support several activities of the Village's National Flood Insurance Community Rating System program including mapping, annual outreach and notification, and the maintenance of all flood zone designations and other data for all real property folio numbers within the Village. In addition, the project will integrate Village's data into Miami-Dade County's GIS system tailoring products generated for Village use. The additional information generated by this system will be essential for the preparation of detailed flood mitigation reports and allow users to track conditions by specific property location. This data will then be utilized to clearly identify and designate low lying areas, which will streamline flood prevention efforts when designing new systems and upgrading drainage systems. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Hazardous Material Containment Future Unfunded Project Health,Flood/Stor m Surge,Wind Unidentified funding source 4,000.00 63 1/2/2014 less than 1 year Purchase cabinets and other containment equipment to house and contain chemicals, oils. fuels. and batteries that may spill and cause polluted run-off during a hurricane. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Improvements to Public Works Facility Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge,Wind No grant funding identified for this project 125,000.00 67 1/2/2014 less than 1 year The Village of Palmetto Bay's Public Works Department facility is need of retrofitting improvements to protect from high wind and/or flood damage. Proposed improvements include hurricane impact windows and doors, waterproof walls and elevation of electrical and mechanical utilities that service the building. This will secure the facility for the emergency response team, village employees and equipment at the time of natural disaster events. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Localized Drainage Improvements Phase VI Funding Secured ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Storm Surge Stormwater Utility Revenue with the potential for grant funding from FDEP and SFWMD. Funding Secured 403,733.00 71 12/29/2016 2 years or greater Existing catch basins should be modified or reconstructed as required to provide sediment traps (sumps) and pollution retardant baffles to protect the exfiltration trench. Constructing additional infrastructure to include catch basins, manholes, culverts, and exfiltration trench is recommended to interconnect the catch basins. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Localized Drainage Improvements Phase VII Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Storm Surge Potential to secure FDEP and/or SFWMD grant funding inclusive of Village Stormwater Utility Revenue. 500,000.00 67 12/29/2016 2 years or greater Roadway drainage basins with closed systems and only minimal drainage infrastructure. Constructing additional catch basins, manholes, culverts, and exfiltration trench is recommended to interconnect the catch basins at low points in the roadway swales of the localized areas. Swale modification may be required in some locations. 84 of 93 250 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Palmetto Bay Pre-Disaster Employee Response Plan and Training Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge,Other Potential use of Stormwater Utility Revenue 100,000.00 76 12/27/2013 less than 6 months Create an Emergency Management pre-disaster/disaster response plan to ensure the best practices are in place prior to and after a disaster. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Public Information and Educational Campaign Funding Secured ,Flood/Storm Surge,Sea Level Rise,Power Failure,Wind,Tech nological Disruption,Health Stormwater Utility Funding Funding Secured 16,500.00 83 12/30/2013 less than 6 months Develop a "How to" manual specifically for Palmetto Bay citizens. Through the use of grant funds, the Village can develop community disaster education programs to promote awareness of emergencies and educate residents on the appropriate response and necessary preparation when an emergency threatens. This effort should reduce demands on local government and facilitate recovery after the event. This is a key item since both the Village and the County are responsible for various city services. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Public structure improvements Other ,Flood/Storm Surge Applying for the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program through FEMA. Identified Funding Source 50,000.00 58 11/21/2017 1 month To improve the damaged equipment at a traffic circle within Palmetto bay by raising the electrical box and perhaps using a different style of lighting that would be more resistant to being submerged. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Purchase Hurricane Preparedness & Debris Clearance Equipment Flood,Wind Project to be removed.282,450.00 67 1/2/2014 project to be removed Acquire Vacon Drain Truck ($193,200) and Trash Grabber with 20-Yard dump bed ($89,250) for hurricane preparedness, debris clearing and regular maintenance. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Purchase of Portable Emergency Traffic Lights Future Unfunded Project ,Power Failure,Technologi cal Disruption Unidentified at this time.150,000.00 64 12/27/2013 more than 6 months Purchase portable solar-powered emergency traffic lights to be used at main intersections throughout the Village of Palmetto Bay, including US 1. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Remove Australian Pines within Village Limits along Roadways that Connect to Evacuation Routes Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge,Wind Unidentified funding source 125,000.00 66 1/2/2014 < 2 years The Village has a number of old, deteriorated Australian pines that easily become a hazard during high winds. This project would benefit the Village and mitigate future damages caused by fallen trees and help to reduce the amount of debris present following a high wind or after a major storm event. The removal of these Australian pines requires specialized equipment and skills that the Village Public Works Department does not possess. This project would enable the Village to hire a professional contractor to remove the hazardous Australian pines that are susceptible to uprooting in high winds and heavy storms. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Repetitive Loss Retrofit Funding Secured Flood/Storm Surge,Wind,Sea Level Rise Stormwater Utility Revenue Identified Funding Source 313,570.00 64 1/2/2014 > than one year Mitigate and Retrofit Repetitive / Severe Repetitive loss properties on FEMA inventory, to reduce flood and wind related losses. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Street Sweeping Program Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge,Other Stormwater Utility Grant Identified Funding Source 50,000.00 59 12/30/2013 < 2 years In order to minimize blockage of storm drains, the Village will be required to clean the debris from its roadways before it washes into the drain. A street sweeping program will comply wit provisions of the federal mandated Clean Water Act. In addition, street sweeping helps to remove pollutants that potentially can drain into the stormwater system. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Sub-Basin 59/60 Funding Secured ,Flood/Storm Surge,Flood,Storm Surge SFWMD and Stormwater Utility Revenue Grant Awarded 1,100,000.00 66 12/28/2016 by the end of 2018 Clean and flush all sediment and debris from existing catch basins and pipes and adjust catch basin elevations and locations to minimize accumulation of sediment and debris. Install additional infrastructure . Existing catch basins should be modified or reconstructed as required to provide sediment traps (sumps) and pollution retardant baffles to protect the exfiltration trench. Constructing additional catch basins, manholes, culverts, and exfiltration trench is recommended to interconnect the catch basins. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Sub-Basin 61 Drainage Improvements Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Storm Surge Stormwater Utility Revenue, SFWMD grant and FDEP grant funds 520,000.00 65 12/28/2016 FY 2018-2019 The sub-basin consists of approximately 26.29 acres of existing detached single-family residential development with approximately 4,770 linear feet of roadway, including SW 155th Street, SW 156th Street, SW 157th Street, SW 158th Street, SW 160th Street, SW 79th Avenue, SW 78th Place, SW 78th Avenue, and SW 77th Court. The drainage system in this sub-basin includes three outfall connections along SW 77th Court, but the outfalls are only connected to local catch basins.Clean and flush all sediment and debris from existing catch basins, pipes, outfalls, and adjust catch basin elevations and locations to minimize accumulation of sediment and debris. Install the additional infrastructure.Existing catch basins should be modified or reconstructed as required to provide sediment traps (sumps) and pollution retardant baffles to protect the exfiltration trench. An analysis of the existing outfall capacities should be performed to evaluate the need for potential outfall improvements. Constructing additional catch basins, manholes, culverts, and exfiltration trench is recommended to interconnect the catch basins. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Swale and Tree Trimming Program Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge,Other,Wind Potential to obtain funding from an Urban Forestry Grant Identified Funding Source 100,000.00 64 1/3/2014 5-2017 Develop and Implement a program o trim trees prior to hurricane season and allow for an increase in survivability of the trees and reduce the safety concerns of residents. In addition, proper trimming and pruning would benefit in minimizing damages to utility, building structures, and vehicles as a result of down trees during a severe storm. This initiative will also reduce debris and protect the infrastructure from damage to sidewalks and roads. Municipalities Palmetto Bay Water intrusion prevention at Library and community center Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge Hazard Mitigation Grant Program through FEMA. Identified Funding Source 40,000.00 72 11/21/2017 1-2 months Flood shields/door dams to eliminate water intrusion to the building. Municipalities Pinecrest Burial of Over-head Power Lines along Arterial Roadway Future Unfunded Project Wind 50,000,000.00 65 12/1/2012 > 1 year Design and construct the burial of all over-head power lines along the municipal arterial roadways. This project would mitigate the potential for loss of power during severe weather events and would enhance the response to areas of the Village during emergencies by limiting obstacles and life-safety issues on critical transportation infrastructure. Power loss in the Village is critical since the majority of residents obtain water from wells which use electricity to power their pumps. Municipalities Pinecrest Canal Bank Erosion Protection Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge Unknown/None 100,000.00 49 12/1/2012 less than 6 months Design and construct erosion protection structures and bank stabilization projects along village canals which are vulnerable to bank erosion due to storm surge or inland flooding. This project includes the removal of undesirable debris, trees, predominantly Australian pines and ficus, located in close proximity to the canal bank. These trees are prone to falling during a severe windstorm or hurricane causing flow obstructions as well as damage to the canal bank resulting in increased erosion. We must also schedule regular maintenance of village canals to restore flow. Municipalities Pinecrest Community Disaster Education Program Future Unfunded Project All Hazards Unknown/None 30,000.00 62 12/1/2012 6 mos to 1 year Develop education materials such as brochures and newsletters, and improve communication with the community through streaming video and radio station improvements to promote emergency preparation awareness and provide information to the residents of the Village of Pinecrest urging them to act proactively in the preparation of properties and structures in the event of a disaster. Municipalities Pinecrest Development of Neighborhood Response Teams Future Unfunded Project All Hazards Unknown/None 30,000.00 75 12/1/2012 less than 6 months Develop and train Neighborhood Response Teams to increasing community involvement in the Village's damage assessment teams after a storm event. Having volunteers involved in the Windshield Assessment will allow the Village wide assessment to be done more efficiently and will allow the Certified Inspector to focus their attention in areas sustaining substantial structural and electrical damage where structures may have to be tagged as Unsafe for Occupancy. Municipalities Pinecrest Hardening of Coral Pine Park Building Future Unfunded Project Wind Unknown/None 50,000.00 56 12/1/2012 6 mos to 1 year Add hurricane rated windows, storm shutters, reinforced doors and otherwise harden the renovated building at Coral Pine Park. Construction is scheduled to begin in the fall of 2013. 85 of 93 251 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Pinecrest Improvements to Pinecrest GardensMain Entrance Building Future Unfunded Project Wind Grant Applied For 75,000.00 56 12/1/2012 6 mos to 1 year Installation of hurricane impact windows in the main entrance building of Pinecrest Gardens. This building contains Village offices as well as two multi-purpose rooms. Pinecrest Gardens is historically designated and this building was built in 1954. Municipalities Pinecrest Public Works EOC Facility Future Unfunded Project All Hazards 150,000.00 60 12/1/2012 6 mos to 1 year The construction of a fully functional EOC facility on the second floor of the existing Public Works Department. Currently, the 2- story building is structurally safe and provides a lunch room and shop on the first floor. However, the 2nd floor is currently unused and not sufficiently equipped to provide electricity, air conditioning or any sleeping accommodations. In the event of a disaster, it is imperative that all Village Public Works Department employees report to duty. Public Works must be operable before, during and immediately after any disaster to provide residents access to streets and deal with other safety issues. Municipalities Pinecrest Purchase of Portable Emergency Traffic Lights Future Unfunded Project Power Failure Unknown/None 100,000.00 83 12/1/2012 less than 6 months Purchase portable solar-powered emergency traffic lights to be used at main intersections throughout the Village of Pinecrest, including US1. Municipalities Pinecrest Purchase of Portable Two-Way Radios Other Communications Failure (Select)110,000.00 0 12/1/2012 2013 Purchase upgraded portable two-way radios for various departments, including Police, that serve on the disaster assessment teams and in the recovery process. Municipalities Pinecrest Reverse 911 System Future Unfunded Project All Hazards Unknown/None 75,000.00 68 12/1/2012 less than 6 months To purchase a reverse 911 system that would allow the Village of Pinecrest Police Department to provide emergency information to village residents. Municipalities South Miami Citywide Drainage Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge Funding Secured 700,000.00 2 1/22/2014 Ongoing Yearly project The Stormwater Master Plan (SMP) is a citywide study which provides an evaluation of the current flood protection level of service (LOS) of the existing stormwater infrastructure. Potential flooding areas that require drainage improvements were identified and prioritized in the SMP. Furthermore, the study identifies existing and future operation and maintenance needs. These areas will be addressed in phases, by level of priority, as reported in the SMP. Municipalities South Miami Citywide Drainage Improvements, Phase 6 Construction/Project Begun ,Flood/Storm Surge (Select)275,000.00 14 1/22/2014 1 Year The scope of work for the proposed storm drainage improvements include providing new drainage inlets and manholes structures, exfiltration trench, grass swales. milling and resurfacing or overlay of existing asphalt roadways, new traffic pavement markings and sidewalk repair. The project limits are SW 59th Avenue from SW 74th Street to SW 80th Street, and SW 74th Terrace from SW 59th Avenue to SW 58th Avenue. Municipalities South Miami City-Wide Storn Drainage Clean-out Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge Funding Secured 30,000.00 15 1/22/2014 Ongoing Yearly project The citywide storm drain cleaning is a routine maintenance completed annually. Drains throughout the City and cleaned out to prevent flooding. Municipalities South Miami Improvement of the Stormwater Drainage System Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge (Select)1,075,000.00 57 12/1/2012 Ongoing Yearly project To upgrade the City's drainage system by implementing engineering design and construction plans preparation needed to retrofit existing positive drain system and construction of new drainage system, in an effort to meet the flood protection responsibilities. The program will also include removal of slit from the canal system and creating needed depth for proper flow Municipalities South Miami Installation of Hurricane Shutters in City Buildings Future Unfunded Project Wind (Select)100,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown Currently, some of the City's buildings do not have shutters. Installing shutters in these buildings would provide secured facilities for emergency response team, city employees and equipment Municipalities South Miami SW 64 Avenue Drainage Improvement Project Construction/Project Begun ,Flood Storm water Drain Trust Fund, People's Transportation Plan Funding Secured 115,230.00 0 12/8/2016 2017 The scope of work for the storm drainage improvements include providing new drainage inlets and manholes structures, exfiltration trench, grass swales, milling and resurfacing. The project limits are SW 64th Avenue, between SW 56th Street and SW 58th Terrace Municipalities South Miami Sylva Martin Historical Building Hurricane Protection Funding Applied for ,Wind Grant Applied For 5,000.00 86 1/22/2014 > than one year The City of South Miami designated the Sylva Martin building as a historical site and therefore is required to comply with preservation principles. The City is currently restoring the 6 existing nonimpact windows in a HVHZ (High Volacity Hurricane Zone) based on preservation principles. This project includes the purchase and installation of wind protective screens over the six openings in the building. This project will provide impact resistant protection to the restored non-impact windows and will protect against winds up to 175 MPH. Municipalities Sunny Isles Beach Central Island Drainage ProjectPump Station/Rainwater Catchment System used as an Alternative to Assist with Flooding and Irrigating Future Unfunded Project Flood Unknown/None 1,015,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown This project consists of a rainwater catchment system and a permanent pump in a chronically flooded area of the City. This system combines a pump station along with the creation of a rainwater catchment system to irrigate and pressure clean roads and sidewalks. The area to be served by this project is from North Bay Road to Collins Avenue and from NE 174 Street to NE183 Street. The area is mainly residential, with commercial strip shops on Collins Avenue. This project will mitigate flooding and damage to resi-dential and commercial structures, and will conserve and re-use water through the recycling process. Municipalities Sunny Isles Beach Emergency Pedestrian Bridge Future Unfunded Project All Hazards Unknown/None 3,007,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown This project will build a bridge to connect North Bay Road. Once a bridge is built to connect North Bay Road, emergency vehicles will have an alternative and quicker means to access the area. Constructing an emergency pedestrian bridge would also assist with evacuation of the area and provide access to emergency vehicles. Hurricanes pose imminent danger to the residents of this area and providing them with alternative roads would reduce evacuation time and better protect the lives of residents, business owners and visitors. Municipalities Sunny Isles Beach Hardening the Government Center Emergency Exit Future Unfunded Project Wind Unknown/None 50,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown The emergency exit located on the east side of the building is also an area of potential problems during a severe weather event.� A stairwell on the exterior of the building leads from the ground floor directly into the interior with no barrier or emergency door in between.� This increases the risk of wind and water damage to the building, as wind and water can be blown from the outside, through the stairwell, and into the interior of the building with no barrier to stop them.� Municipalities Sunny Isles Beach Heritage Park Rainwater Catchment Systems Future Unfunded Project Flood Unknown/None 150,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown The city continues to seek alternative ways of managing rainwater which causes a substantial amount of flooding in the Heritage Park area of the City. The park is located at 19200 Collins Avenue. This project would construct a rainwater catchment system near the Heritage Park parking garage adjacent to the William Lehman Causeway on the southwest corner of the park. Heritage Park has a parking garage which holds approximately 460 vehicles and the runoff creates flooding to the adjacent development. In order to mitigate this issue the city is proposing containing the excess rainwater that would be expelled by the parking garage and contain it to be filtered and used for landscape irrigation and pressure cleaning of the parking garage and sidewalks throughout the park. Municipalities Sunny Isles Beach Relocation and Purchase of Generator at the Government Center Future Unfunded Project Flood Unknown/None 150,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown This project would consist of relocating the telecommunication equipment and purchasing a new generator to be installed on the 2nd floor. The area would be properly ventilated and reinforced to support the weight of the unit. A Maintenance and Implementation Plan would be generated to ensure the equipment is functioning properly and ready for use when the threat of a hurricane arises. Municipalities Surfside Conduct a Study of Storm Surge Mitigation Measures Other Flood/Storm Surge 50,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown The town is subject to the loss of sand from its beaches and has proposed a study to determine if any measures are available to mitigate the effects of storm surges. 86 of 93 252 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Municipalities Surfside Generator Relocation Other Flood 48,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown In order to maintain vital and essential functions at the town of Surfside' s Town Hall and Public Safety Building after a hurricane or flooding event we are proposing moving the existing 225KVA back-up diesel generator from its present location, where it is vulnerable to the possibility of flooding, to a location several feet above the first floor level of the existing building. The work would entail the construction of a superstructure to support the generator, the construction of a weather proof enclosure built to withstand hurricane force winds with enough room to properly service the equipment. It would also include the demolition of the existing enclosure, the rerouting of the existing diesel fuel lines and electrical conductors. In order to complete the project some of the existing electrical switch gear and associated equipment need be raised several feet in the existing electrical room. Municipalities Surfside Install Storm Shutters on the Town Hall Other Wind 147,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown The town of Surfside would like to install storm shutters at our Town Hall building which also serves as the Police Department headquarters. The storm shutters would allow the Police Department to remain in the building during Category 1 and 2 storms and possibly even a category 3 storm. This would be a tremendous benefit to the community as the police department would not have to relocate to an off-site facility and would be readily available to respond to emergency calls and provide order maintenance once the storm passes. It should be noted that Town Hall is located one block from the ocean. �� Municipalities Surfside Obtain Backup Generators Other Power Failure 0.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown The biggest need for these generators is to provide backup power to two sewer-pumping stations. Municipalities Surfside Remove Overhead Utility Lines Other Power Failure 0.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown Burying overhead utility lines would reduce future power outages during disaster and improve the aesthetics of the town. Municipalities Surfside Stormwater Management System Improvements Other Flood 0.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown There are areas of Surfside that flood repeatedly. This project would improve the stormwater management system in those areas to reduce flooding in future disasters. Municipalities Sweetwater Northern Sweetwater Drainage & Roadway Improvements (Phase 8) Project in Planning Stage ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Sea Level Rise DEP, CDBG, HMGP, City Funds Grant Applied For 1,400,000.00 88 01/09/2018 12 months Installation of a stormwater drainage system in the Northeastern area of the City bounded by NW 19th St to the North, NW 14th St to the South, NW 109th Ave to the West, and NW 107th Ave to the East. The project shall include all labor and materials necessary for the installation of a stormwater pump station that will discharge into the canal located North of NW 25 Street as well as the installation of a storm water collection and transmission system including catch basins, junction boxes, a stormwater forcemain, manholes, conflict structures and inlets, drainage pipe, asphalt overlay, and swale restoration within project limits. Currently, this area experiences severe floods during any rainstorm due to antiquidated drainage structures, and a lack of pumps. Standing water remains for several days before it recedes. This is of great hindrance to the local commercial, industrial, cargo and freight, businesses as well residential properties. The completion of this project will result in mitigation of floods, prevention of property damage and loss, and improved traffic and public safety for businesses and individuals who visit this highly-frequented area. Municipalities Sweetwater Stormwater Improvements NW 108th Avenue (Phase I) Project in Planning Stage ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge City Funds, DEP, CDBG, and FEMA Grant Applied For 1,628,808.00 84 12/14/2015 12 months This project consists of installing a storm drainage system in the northeastern area of the City. It is bounded by NW 25 St to the North, NW 21 St to the South, NW 109 Ave to the West, NW 107 Ave to the East. The project shall include all labor and materials necessary for the installation of a stromwater pump station that will discharge into the canal located North of NW 25 Street. The project will also consist of installing a storm water collection and transmission system including catch basins, junction boxes, stromwater forcemain, sodding, asphalt, pavement and appurtenances. Municipalities Sweetwater Stormwater Improvements Phase IIB North remaining Construction/Project Begun ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge CDBG, GOB, DEP, SFWMD - All secured Grant Applied For 620,000.00 0 12/10/2015 December 2016 Stormwater Improvement Phase IIB North remaining -At this point, approximately 85 percent of the overall Stormwater Improvements Phase IIB North Drainage Project described below in the comments section has been funded and completed. This project is carried out in the following area: between Flagler Street to the North, SW 109th Avenue to the east, SW 4th Street to the south, and SW 112th Avenue to the west. (see attached illustration) Municipalities Virginia Gardens VG - 37 street storm water improvements Future Unfunded Project ,Flood State of Florida, fdot Grant Applied For 650,000.00 64 10/23/2015 unknown Add storm water and curb drainage on NW 37 STREET between 62-57 AVE. In addition, mill and overlay roadway adding new striping and ADA cross walks. Municipalities Virginia Gardens VG - NW 40 street Stormwater Improvement Project Funding Secured Flood fdot Grant Awarded 697,000.00 0 7/8/2013 may 2018 Purposed request would permit the ability to retain stormwater runoff in the right of way. There would be improvements to the stormwater curb drainage including ADA sidewalks, crosswalks along with repaving of the area. Municipalities Virginia Gardens VG - Storm Drain Rehabilitation Project Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Other state of florida or mdc 350,000.00 67 1/21/2015 unknown Drain lines have been filmed village wide. Numerous roots were identified intruding into joints and need to be removed to ensure proper water flow. Municipalities Virginia Gardens VG - Village Hall ADA and Voting Upgrades Future Unfunded Project Health,Other,Win d State of Florida Grant Applied For 590,000.00 0 7/8/2013 unknown Upgrade current voting area and council chambers to enhance access for handicap individuals and the general public. Reinforce Village Hall for hurricanes and wind events. Possible shelter capability. Municipalities Virginia Gardens VG - Water Net Improvement Project Future Unfunded Project Health,Flood n/a 300,000.00 0 7/8/2013 unknown Add new 1450 feet of 8 inch water main with 2 fire hydrants to eliminate a 2 inch galvanized water main and replace meter service lines. Municipalities West Miami Impact Resistant Windows for City Hall Funding Applied for ,Wind General Fund Identified Funding Source 100,000.00 90 2/5/2014 less than 6 months The windows and doors currently installed are not impact resistant. The project entails the replacement of a total of 18 existing windows and 2 existing doors (1 storefront and 1 front door) on the West Miami city hall building, with impact resistant windows and doors. Estimated cost: $100,000 Municipalities West Miami Localized Drainage Projects Funding Applied for ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Storm Surge Storm Water Fund Identified Funding Source 500,000.00 73 1/22/2015 less than 6 months Installation of french drain system to address localized flooding during rain events. The area included in this project has been historically flood-prone for storm events exceeding the 10-year frequency. Drainage improvements from SW 62nd Avenue to SW 57th Avenue and from SW 8th Street to SW 18th Street consisting of construction of storm sewer collection and ex-filtration systems including street and surface restorations. Estimated cost: $500,000 Municipalities West Miami Police Department Expansion Funding Applied for ,Security Breach,Other USDA Grant Applied For 500,000.00 84 10/6/2014 2017 Expansion of the West Miami Police station to provide an EOC room, training, exercise room and internal affairs and interogation room. Build a second floor over existing structure to provide space for facilities. Municipalities West Miami West Miami Recreation Center Annex Project in Planning Stage ,Flood/Storm Surge,Health Recreation Fund Identified Funding Source 600,000.00 71 11/23/2016 6 months This facility floods frequently due to its low finished floor elevation. This flooding occurs for storm events exceeding the 10-year frequency. Demolish a single story CMU/concrete structure (approx. 2200 sq. ft. area) and construction of a single story CMU/concrete structure with 2200 sq. ft. with a finished floor elevation above the 100-year flood level. The building’s primary function is to accommodate the parks recreational operations and will have the capability to serve as a storm shelter. The buildings design will be sensitive to the spatial and aesthetic needs of the park’s surrounding areas and will reflect an approach that fully enhances the neighborhood. Estimated cost: $600,000 87 of 93 253 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Other Miami Beach Community Healthcare 720 Slab Renovation Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge,Health,Stor m Surge,Flood,Sea Level Rise Capital Fund Emergency/ Natural Disaster Funding,CDBG Community Development Block Grants/ State's Program,HMGP Hazard Mitigation Grant Program,Public Assistance Program,Pre- Disaster Funding Programs Identified Funding Source 300,000.00 92 9/28/2016 Unknown Add new slab with supported deep foundations and reinforcement of the walls. Other Miami Beach Community Healthcare Drainage Project at Stanley C. Myers Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Wind Potential Identified Funding Source 50,000.00 98 1/23/2015 6 months The project will secure drainage against natural hazards Other Miami Beach Community Healthcare Flood Mitigation- Stanley C. Myers Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Power Failure,Health,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge Potential Identified Funding Source 200,000.00 95 1/23/2015 6 months Add flood gates and other flood protection to building. Other Miami Beach Community Healthcare Flood Mitigation-Beverly Press Site Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Pow er Failure,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge Potential Identified Funding Source 200,000.00 97 1/23/2015 6 months Add flood gates and other flood protection to building. Other Miami Beach Community Healthcare Install Generator Platform Future Unfunded Project Storm Surge,Power Failure,Technologi cal Disruption Potential Identified Funding Source 100,000.00 94 12/1/2012 12 months The Stanley C. Meyers Center is in need of a redunant emergency power source and the platform to house it. The platform is needed in case of storm, disaster or power outage. Other Miami Beach Community Healthcare Roof hardening for Beverly Press Center Future Unfunded Project ,Health,Wind Potential Identified Funding Source 250,000.00 93 1/23/2015 6 months To harden the roof structure against wind hazards at Beverly Press Community Health Center Other Miami Beach Community Healthcare Roofing Project SCM Future Unfunded Project Wind,Health,Tech nological Disruption Capital Fund Emergency/ Natural Disaster Funding,CDBG Community Development Block Grants/ State's Program,HMGP Hazard Mitigation Grant Program,Public Assistance Program,Pre- Disaster Funding Programs Identified Funding Source 350,000.00 95 12/1/2012 6 months The Stanley C. Meyers Center existing roof is more than 15 years in age. Heavy rain or a tropical storm could cause severe damage to our patient common areas, staff work stations and medical equipment if the roof is damaged. Other Miami Beach Community Healthcare SCM 710 Slab Renovation Future Unfunded Project ,Flood/Storm Surge,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Health Capital Fund Emergency/ Natural Disaster Funding,CDBG Community Development Block Grants/ State's Program,HMGP Hazard Mitigation Grant Program,Public Assistance Program,Pre- Disaster Funding Programs Identified Funding Source 150,000.00 94 9/28/2016 Unknown Removal of existing slab and replace with a new slab with supported of deep foundations. Flood proof slab. Other Miami Beach Community Healthcare Stanley C. Myers Clinic Hardening Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Health,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Wind Capital Fund Emergency/ Natural Disaster Funding,CDBG Community Development Block Grants/ State's Program,HMGP Hazard Mitigation Grant Program,Public Assistance Program,Pre- Disaster Funding Programs Identified Funding Source 1,000,000.00 94 1/23/2015 12 months The project will harden the exterior structure of a busy community healthcare provider, addressing hazard protection for the public. The existing walls of the building must be reinforced to resist flood loads. 88 of 93 254 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription PNP NGO Mactown MACtown Generator for Hazard Mitigation Project in Planning Stage ,Power Failure 25% of cost from Mactown 75% of cost from FEMA 404 mitigation grant Identified Funding Source 400,000.00 70 11/28/2017 6 months to one year MACtown, founded in 1962, serves Individuals with Autism/Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities as an Intermediate Care Facility (ICF/IID) with Adult Day Training, Behavior Services, Residential Habilitation, Supported Independent Living, In-Home Supports, and Supported Employment programs and services. Service to our constituency requires access to a reliable and robust power source without interruption. Power outage during Hurricane Irma tested MACtown’s 45-year old generator. It provided some limited power to our facilities, but was insufficient to do what is required in an ICF. MACtown seeks funding assistance to purchase a new generator that can safeguard its facilities, constituents, and staff. Our 56-bed ICF/IID (built 1973) provides 24-hour nursing to consumers throughout their lifespan with ages ranging from 21 to 86 years with varying levels of functioning. During weather-related emergencies, such as hurricanes, the Adult Life Skill Center was used as a shelter for 50 residents of our Residential Habilitation homes. Our ICF/IID clients were sheltered in place in the three- story ICF/IID facility. In addition to serving our clients, MACtown is included in the emergency plan as a back-up facility for the United Community Options of Miami, (formally known as United Cerebral Palsy of Miami). Direct care staff provides assistance or total care for the consumers, as required. All clients served by MACtown have been diagnosed with autism/intellectual and developmental disabilities and have dual diagnoses and complex needs. They may present with a range of medical diagnoses such as seizure disorder, uncontrolled diabetes, visual impairment, urinary problems requiring catheterization every four hours, sleep apnea, hearing impairment, or a combination of conditions, among others. Many of MACtown’s ICF/IID residents are non-ambulatory. Nursing services are provided by two Registered Nurses (one of whom is a certified developmental disability nurse) and nine Licensed Practical Nurses on staff. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) classifies Intermediate Care Facilities for individuals with Intellectual Disabilities (ICF/IID) as Long Term Care Facilities. ICF/IID care is funded by Medicare at 100 percent. The program is highly regulated by the federal government with the Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) providing licensure approval and compliance oversight. The impact of Hurricane Irma on our ICF/IID and the Adult Life Skills Center was a power outage that continued for five days. Our aged generator began to fail only providing power to the first floor of the ICF/IID and its kitchen. The generator powered the air- conditioning, emergency lighting, refrigerators, and the elevator. In the Life Skills Center, 50 of our Residential Habilitation clients were sheltered and sleeping on air mattresses and cots without air-conditioning or lighting. In the ICF/IID, the second and third PNP NGO Vizcaya Museum and Gardens Main House and Gardens Seawall, Dry Floodproofing & Sediment Barrier Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge,Flood,Sea Level Rise,Power Failure,Technologi cal Disruption,Health Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, General Obligation Bond Identified Funding Source 6,000,000.00 84 12/21/2015 01/30/2019 Design and build seawall around the property in order to provide protection from seawater rise and storm surge. Design and implement temporary (installed before event) and permanent dry flood proofing measures as additional protection to the historic house which is made of porous stone and surrounded by porous stone and numerous openings. The combination of these two methods of protection would be most likely to prevent continued flooding in the basement. PNP NGO Vizcaya Museum and Gardens Main House Exterior Window and Door Restoration & Wind Storm Protection Reinforcement Future Unfunded Project Wind,Security Breach,Other Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, General Obligation Bond, Florida Department of State Appropriation Identified Funding Source 2,000,000.00 86 1/23/2013 12/31/2018 The scope of this project entails the refurbishment of the historical windows in Vizcaya's Main House with impact glass and the addition of wind storm protection for doors and windows throughout the Main House. This project will provide a higher level of wind storm protection for Vizcaya's Main House, while preserving the historic integrity and aesthetics of this National Historic Landmark. Windstorm reinforcements will provide additional thermal protection that will help lower electrical costs. PNP NGO Vizcaya Museum and Gardens Main House MEP System Floodproofing Future Unfunded Project Health,Power Failure,Sea Level Rise,Storm Surge,Technologic al Disruption,Securit y Breach,Flood/Stor m Surge,Flood Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, General Obligation Bond Identified Funding Source 1,000,000.00 88 10/27/2017 2019 Basement mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems to be improved and/or relocated to prevent loss of power, equipment, and personal property as well as prevent risk of electrical shock or health hazards. Where possible, install camlocks, transfer switches, and electrical panels to facilitate the connection of portable emergency generators; replace pumps with submersible or inline pumps; install switches, circuit isolation and/or quick connect capability to facilitate rapid connection of back up power; elevate equipment and controls; anchor or strengthen base connections on tanks and install self-initiating disconnects and shut off valves between tanks and distribution lines to minimize damage and leaks. Retrofit existing emergency power generator to become dual-fuel so that power generating capabilities are enhanced in the event one fuel source or the other is compromised in the aftermath of an event. PNP NGO Vizcaya Museum and Gardens Main House Roof Replacement & Roof Structure Enhancement Future Unfunded Project Wind,Security Breach,Other Government Obligation Bond, Florida Division of Historical Resources' Special Category Grant Program Grant Applied For 1,800,000.00 85 1/23/2013 12/31/2017 This project will involve the replacement of the tile roof and membrane on Vizcaya's Main House that has been seriously compromised from recent hurricanes. The roof wood structure and wood deck will be reinforced to comply with present day wind storm building codes. The project will also include new insulation throughout the attic area that will help lower electrical costs. PNP NGO Vizcaya Museum and Gardens Vizcaya Village Structures Envelope Restoration & Wind Storm Protection Future Unfunded Project Wind,Security Breach,Other General Obligation Bond Identified Funding Source 1,500,000.00 86 1/23/2013 12/31/2017 This project will involve the replacement of the roof systems (cover and underlayment), the refurbishment of historical windows and the installation of wind storm protection for the windows and doors on Vizcaya's Village structures that have been seriously compromised from recent hurricanes. These structures consist of the Superintendent's House, Staff Residence, Stables and Wagon Shed, Storage Shed, Dairy, and Chicken House. The roof wood structures and wood decks will be reinforced and/or replaced to comply with present day wind storm building codes. The project will also include new insulation throughout the attic areas of these historic buildings to help lower electrical costs. The project will provide a higher level of wind storm protection for the Vizcaya Village buildings, while at the same time preserving the historic integrity and aesthetics of these structures. The windstorm reinforcements will also provide additional thermal protection that will help lower electrical costs. Regional State South Florida Water Management District C-1N Canal Capacity Enhancement Future Unfunded Project Flood NONE Identified Funding Source 500,000.00 0 7/18/2013 2 years after project funding is secured Increase the C-1N canal's cross section up and down stream of the Caribbean Blvd Bridge to remove the existing constriction. The C-1N is under the jurisdiction of the SFWMD 89 of 93 255 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Universities Colleges Florida International University CRISP Type 2: ORganizing DEcentralized Resilience in CRitical Interdependent-Infrastructure Systems and Processes (ORDER-CRISP) Funding Applied for ,Wind,Flood/Stor m Surge NSF Critical Resilient Interdependent Infrastructure Systems and Processes (CRISP) Grant Applied For 0.00 96 2/24/2016 01/01/2017- 12/31/2020 Our mission is generating integrated and transformative scholarship, information, tools and techniques to support our overarching goals: (i) to promote cascade-proofing mechanisms in the interdependent infrastructure systems and processes used by coastal communities, and (ii) facilitate decentralized resilience by enabling citizens to participate and contribute to that resiliency. Our proposed research is truly interdisciplinary and the individual components are well integrated as they tie quantitative (computational, engineering-based and socio-economic) analyses with active community engagement. Our proposed comparative framework (Miami and Houston) include a number of interdisciplinary research components: (i) analyzing the physical aspects of coastal vulnerability (through storm surge, freshwater flood and wind risk modeling) on interdependent infrastructures (cascading effects on electricity, water, transportation and communication); (ii) analyzing social dynamics of risk averting behavior through agent based modeling and micro simulation of evolving processes of decentralized resilience through sharing critical resources and information; (iii) a macro-interdependency model integrating the household and social responses with interdependent infrastructure systems and processes under extreme events; (iv) policy simulation for facilitating adaptive learning and enhancing decentralized resilience under a wide range of scenarios; and geo-spatial and visual analytics with data meshing to better communicate interdependent infrastructure failures and evolving path of decentralized resilience; (v) build a prototype mobile phone application to promote crowd-sourced participatory resilience. Universities Colleges Florida International University Harden Academic II Building Future Unfunded Project Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 750,000.00 68 12/1/2012 unknown The Academic II Building on the Biscayne Bay campus necessitates hardening of its external envelope including all windows, doors and other openings. Additionally roof mounted equipment will be better secured. While full student evacuation occurs at a Category 2 or higher hurricane, the building structure still requires overall hardening to minimize displacement and critical asset losses. Reinforcing vulnerable areas of the structure will assist FIU in better protecting students, reducing potential losses and assuring a swift recovery Universities Colleges Florida International University Harden Academic One (ACI) Building Future Unfunded Project Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 750,000.00 68 12/1/2012 unknown The Academic One building on the Biscayne Bay campus requires strengthening of its external envelop including all windows, doors and other openings. In addition roof mounted equipment will be better secured and other external protective measures undertaken. While full student evacuation occurs at a Category 2 or higher hurricane, the building structure still requires overall hardening to minimize displacement and critical asset losses. Reinforcing vulnerable areas of the structure will assist FIU in better protecting students, reducing potential losses and assuring a swift recovery. Universities Colleges Florida International University Harden Chemistry and Physics Building Future Unfunded Project Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 1,000,000.00 68 12/1/2012 unknown The Chemistry & Physics building on the Modesto Maidique campus requires hardening of its external envelop including all windows, doors, other openings and roof assemblies. Further, the building needs to enclose the roof at the ends of the structure to better reduce wind loads over a roofed over internal courtyard. In addition, the facility houses multiple research and teaching laboratories which require proper ventilation equipment in the form of approximately twelve existing roof mounted fume hood stacks and other critical mechanical equipment; all of which necessitates hardening. Additionally other roof mounted equipment will be better secured and added external protective measures undertaken. Finally, the building's supporting emergency generator and the MECH air handlers at the main roof requires a re-routing of the air intake to avoid the potential for electrical shorts by water infiltration. Chemistry and Physics houses all of the primary chemistry instructional labs, as well as the chemistry department's stockroom. Universities Colleges Florida International University Harden Engineering and Computer Science Building Future Unfunded Project Wind HMGP Funding Secured 1,600,000.00 68 12/1/2012 unknown The Engineering and Computer Science building on the Modesto Maidique campus requires hardening of its external envelop including all windows, doors, other openings and roof. In addition, the structure houses multiple research and teaching laboratories which require proper ventilation equipment in the form of roof mounted fume hood stacks and other critical mechanical equipment; all of which necessitates hardening. Additionally other roof mounted equipment will be better secured and added external protective measures undertaken. Finally the facility has a vulnerable emergency power back up system. The generator sits unprotected at ground level and needs to be elevated and enclosed. The associated fuel tanks also require a protective enclosure. Both projects will ensure continuity of operations during and following a high wind or other disaster event. ECS houses numerous computer science research activities, networking projects, the computer science department and college of arts and sciences. The facility also supports numerous marine biology research labs, which contribute to the survival and understanding of South Florida's ecological system. The support of this facility is critical to the academics of the university, as well as the future members of information technology fields. Universities Colleges Florida International University Harden Graham University Center Future Unfunded Project Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 3,750,000.00 68 12/1/2012 unknown The Graham University Center building on the Modesto Maidique campus necessitates overall structural hardening including the fortification of the building frame assembly, windows, doors, other openings and roofing system. Additionally roof mounted equipment will be better secured and other external protective measures undertaken. The Graham Center also serves as the backup shelter for Monroe County residents, and as such, demands additional strengthening. Hardening the Graham University Center will ensure the safety and security of all occupants and the protection of essential property and other important assets. Universities Colleges Florida International University Harden Health and Life Sciences (HLS) Building I Future Unfunded Project Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 625,000.00 68 12/1/2012 unknown The HLS building serves as one of the principal laboratories for medical research for the new FIU medical school program on the Modesto Maidique campus. Though constructed to meet current building code, the facility has vulnerable roof top equipment including fume hood stacks that extend horizontally up 25 feet that require enhanced safeguarding. In addition, FA intakes and MECH air handlers on the main roof are in need of a protective enclosure. The emergency backup power for the facility is a generator unit that sits unprotected at ground level and needs to be elevated & enclosed. In addition the associated fuel tanks also require an enclosure. Combined this will ensure continuity of operations during and following a high wind or other disaster event. By hardening the HLS building, the vital medical research being conducted daily will be safeguarded and the new FIU medical program better secured. Universities Colleges Florida International University Harden Health and Life Sciences (HLS) II Future Unfunded Project Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 500,000.00 68 12/1/2012 unknown The HLS II building serves as one of the key laboratories for medical research for the new FIU medical school program on the Modesto Maidique campus. Though constructed to meet current building code, the facility has vulnerable roof top equipment including fume hood stacks that extend horizontally up 25 feet that require enhanced safeguarding. In addition, FA intakes and MECH air handlers on the main roof are in need of a protective enclosure. The emergency backup power for the facility is a generator unit that sits unprotected at ground level and needs to be elevated & enclosed. In addition the associated fuel tanks also require an enclosure. Combined this will ensure continuity of operations during and following a high wind or other disaster event. By hardening the HLS building, the vital medical research being conducted daily will be safeguarded and the new FIU medical program secured. 90 of 93 256 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Universities Colleges Florida International University Harden Owa Ehan Building Future Unfunded Project Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 250,000.00 68 12/1/2012 unknown The Owa Ehan building on the Modesto Maidique campus requires hardening of its external envelop including all windows, doors & other openings. In addition, the structure houses multiple research and teaching laboratories which require proper ventilation equipment in the form of roof mounted fume hood stacks and other critical mechanical equipment; all of which necessitates hardening. Additionally other roof mounted equipment will be better secured and added external protective measures undertaken. The facility supports numerous marine biology research labs, which contribute to the survival and understanding of South Florida's ecological system. Hardening the Owa Ehan building will ensure the safety and security of all occupants and the protection of essential property and other important assets. Universities Colleges Florida International University Harden Primera Casa/Charles Perry (01 PC) Building Future Unfunded Project Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 3,012,460.78 83 12/1/2012 More than 1 year. The Primera Casa/Charles Perry building on the Modesto Maidique campus houses the main administrative offices, the University’s datacenter and many classrooms. As such, the building demands enhanced protection of the structural envelop. This project is for replacement of existing windows with storm resistant windows to the entire building. Hardening the 01 PC building will ensure the safety and security of all occupants and the protection of essential property, records and other important assets. Universities Colleges Florida International University Harden the Wolfe University Center Future Unfunded Project Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 950,000.00 68 12/1/2012 unknown The Wolfe University Center on the Biscayne Bay campus needs to harden its external envelope including all windows, doors and other openings. Additionally roof mounted equipment will be better secured. While full student evacuation occurs at a Category 2 or higher hurricane, the building structure still requires overall hardening to minimize displacement and critical asset losses. Reinforcing vulnerable areas of the structure will assist FIU in better protecting students, reducing potential losses and assuring a swift recovery. Universities Colleges Florida International University Harden Viertes Haus Building Future Unfunded Project Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 750,000.00 68 12/1/2012 unknown The Viertes Haus Building on the Modesto Maidique campus requires overall fortification of its external envelope including all windows, doors and other openings. Additionally roof mounted equipment will be better secured. While full student evacuation occurs at a Category 2 or higher hurricane, the building structure still requires overall hardening to minimize displacement and critical asset losses. Reinforcing vulnerable areas of the structure will assist FIU in better protecting students, reducing potential losses and assuring a swift recovery. Universities Colleges Florida International University Harden Wolfsonian Annex Future Unfunded Project Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 975,000.00 68 12/1/2012 unknown The Wolfsonian Annex is located on Miami Beach in close proximity to the Atlantic Ocean. The facility houses a priceless art collection of design objects from the early 1900's and is housed in facilities from the same historic era as its artifacts. As such, the facility is in urgent need of fortification to ensure the preservation of both its invaluable contents and protection of its historic structures. Specifically, all windows, doors & other openings will be hardened. Hardening the Wolfsonian Annex will ensure the security and protection of precious artwork and other essential assets. Universities Colleges Florida International University Harden Wolfsonian Museum Future Unfunded Project Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 535,000.00 68 12/1/2012 unknown The Wolfsonian Museum is located on Miami Beach in close proximity to the Atlantic Ocean. The facility houses a priceless art collection of design objects from the early 1900's and is housed in facilities from the same historic era as its artifacts. As such, the facility is in urgent need of fortification to ensure the preservation of both its invaluable contents and protection of its historic structures. Specifically, all windows, doors & other openings will be hardened. Hardening the Wolfsonian Museum will ensure the security and protection of precious artwork and other essential assets. Universities Colleges Florida International University PG5 Market Station First Floor Shutter Installation Future Unfunded Project ,Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 1,205,959.78 80 01/12/2018 More than 1 year.This project is for the installation of roll down shutters to the first floor of the PG5 Building. The first floor of the PG5 building is classroom space designated as shelter space for the families of essential personnel. Universities Colleges Florida International University PG5 Market Station Generator Installation Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge,Power Failure,Technologi cal Disruption,Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 904,709.16 82 01/12/2018 More than 1 year. This project is for the installation of a generator in the PG5 building that will provide back up power to portions of the first floor of the building. The PG5 building is a critical facility as it houses a police station, the emergency operations center and office space for the management of critical functions. The facility is also the designated shelter for families of essential personnel. Facility is opened to the surrounding community for storage of personal vehicles to mitigate damage that may be caused to them by storms. The parking capacity of the facility is 2,100 vehicles. Universities Colleges Miami Dade College Entrepreneurial Edu Cntr, bldg 1000 Construction/Project Begun Wind HMGP Grant submitted on June 7, 2013 (Proposal ID# G13-0034) Funding Secured 148,720.00 80 unknown Installation of hurricane shutters/window screen protection on the two floors of the Entrepreneurial Education Center Building 1000. The Miami Dade College Entrepreneurial Education Center Classroom Building has many large glass windows and doors that are currently unprotected. MDC will protect the glass windows and doors in vulnerable areas around the building. The building houses instructional spaces, food services, and student services. The main electrical systems, chiller plant, and generator are also housed in this building. If windstorm damage occurs, vital infrastructure will suffer, and the damage will cause a shutdown of the campus. Installation of windstorm damage protection will mitigate hurricane and tornado damage and ensure that the campus infrastructure is able to weather a disaster. Universities Colleges Miami Dade College Homestead Campus Bldg B Future Unfunded Project ,Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 470,925.00 57 10/31/2016 Unknown Installation of hurricane shutters/window screen protection on the Homestead Campus Building G. The building has many large glass windows and doors that are currently unprotected. MDC will protect the glass windows and doors in vulnerable areas around the building. The building houses both instructional spaces and laboratories. If windstorm damage occurs, vital infrastructure will suffer, and the damage will cause a shutdown of the campus. Installation of windstorm damage protection will mitigate hurricane and tornado damage and ensure that the campus infrastructure is able to weather a disaster. Universities Colleges Miami Dade College Homestead Campus Bldg G Future Unfunded Project ,Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 682,500.00 58 10/31/2016 Unknown Installation of hurricane shutters/window screen protection on the Homestead Campus Building B. The building has many large glass windows and doors that are currently unprotected. MDC will protect the glass windows and doors in vulnerable areas around the building. The building houses the campus library, instructional spaces and administrative offices. If windstorm damage occurs, vital infrastructure will suffer, and the damage will cause a shutdown of the campus. Installation of windstorm damage protection will mitigate hurricane and tornado damage and ensure that the campus infrastructure is able to weather a disaster. Universities Colleges Miami Dade College Kendall Campus Bldg. 9000 Project in Planning Stage ,Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 1,207,500.00 72 01/12/2018 1 year Building 9000 houses mission critical units like Business Affairs for Administration and Student Services, as well as the college's Data Center and it's support team. These areas are necessary and vital for operating the college and we cannot afford to have these areas damaged or interrupted in any way. We seek to replace existing openings (i.e windows and doors) for the facility to meet Florida Building Code requirements for impact and wind pressures. This request will primairly focus on the portion of the facility where the Business Affairs units and Data Center reside. Universities Colleges Miami Dade College Kendall Campus, bldg 100 Funding Applied for Wind State of Florida Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (potential) Grant Applied For 455,159.00 80 unknown This project involves hurricane resistant wind retrofit measures for wind protection. The proposed activity will mitigate wind damage to Miami Dade College's Kendall Campus Building 100, which has many large windows and doors that are currently unprotected. The building houses instructional spaces, administrative offices, and student services. If windstorm damage occurs, vital infrastructure will suffer, and damage will cause a shutdown of the building. Installation of windstorm damage protection will mitigate hurricane and tornado damage and ensure that the infrastructure is able to weather a disaster 91 of 93 257 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Universities Colleges Miami Dade College Kendall Campus, bldg 7000 Future Unfunded Project Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 286,650.00 78 unknown This project involves hurricane resistant wind retrofit measures for wind protection, including the removal of existing non-code compliant hurricane shutters and replacement with code-compliant aluminum accordion shutters and impact glass. The project will install impact glass and hurricane shutters on windows and doors at Miami Dade College Kendall Campus Building 7000. The building houses administrative offices, student services, and classrooms. The activity will protect the College from property damage. Universities Colleges Miami Dade College Kendall Campus, bldg. L HURRICANE PROTECTION Future Unfunded Project ,Wind TBD Identified Funding Source 723,331.00 65 11/29/2017 TBD Building L houses the offices of Facilities Management and part of the IT department. These offices house essential records with the plans and maintenance records for all of the college buildings. The offices of the Emergency Operations Center is also housed in this facility. It would be a great hardship if these offices were damaged by a windstorm. The request is to install new windows and doors at the facility to meet Florida Building Code requirements for impact and wind pressures, the request is limited to replacing the ground floor doors and windows that enclose habitable spaces, essential service spaces, does not include upgrading the doors and louvers associated with the chiller room. Universities Colleges Miami Dade College MDC-West Administrative Bldg Future Unfunded Project Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 102,375.00 82 unknown Administrative offices, instructional spaces, offices, and food service are housed in the building. The building is the hub of the instructional and administrative activities for this campus in the area. Windstorm mitigation of this facility will assure quicker recovery of services provided. Install protective hurricane (permanent type) screens or other hurricane protection on windows. Design, specify and install impact resistant hurricane screens or other hurricane protection for Miami Dade College West Campus Universities Colleges Miami Dade College North Campus, bldg. 900 HURRICANE PROTECTION Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge TBD Identified Funding Source 454,298.00 67 11/29/2017 TBD The existing district facility serves as a district wide support center housing maintenance and receiving offices as well as storage and maintenance repair areas. A large portion of the existing facility remains unused and is under consideration for revitalization. The North Campus is not in a flood zone and the existing precast structure is solid with large open spaces. There are a number of possible uses that could be housed in this facility,including vital response units, however the existing openings are not protected, the existing overhead doors are solid but are not rated for impact or pressures as prescribed by the present Florida Building Code. The request is to install windstorm damage protection to meet Florida Building Code requirements for impact and wind pressures. Universities Colleges Miami Dade College Wolfson Campus, Bldg 1000 BASEMENT-FLOOD PROTECTION Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 250,000.00 77 unknown The basement of building 1000 is below street level and is subject to flooding. Located in the basement is the main (central) chiller equipment for buildings 1000, 2000, 3000, and 4000. The main electrical systems and generator are also located in the basement. The Wolfson maintenance department, work order system and storage are in this basement. District and Campus administrative offices are housed in this building. If flooding occurs in this basement, vital infrastructure will suffer causing a shutdown of most of Miami Dade College Wolfson Campus. Install the backup pump to relieve the basement of flooding and damage to the equipment. In the case of a major flooding event, this pump will facilitate recovery of this campus and mitigate associated costs. Design, specify and install a water pump at Miami Dade College Wolfson Campus Building 1000 basement. The job will include all necessary equipment, electrical, and mechanical needs. Universities Colleges Miami Dade College Wolfson Campus, Bldg 1000 HURRICANE PROTECTION Future Unfunded Project Wind HMGP Identified Funding Source 3,276,000.00 78 unknown The District and campus administrative offices, support services and instructional rooms are housed in the building. The main electrical systems and generator are also located in the building. The Wolfson maintenance department, work order system and storage are in the basement of this building. District and campus administrative offices are housed in this building. If windstorm damage occurs, vital infrastructure will suffer causing a shutdown of most of Miami Dade College Wolfson Campus. Installing windstorm damage protection will mitigate damage and facilitate recovery. The building is the hub of the instructional and administrative activities for this center and other satellite centers in the area. Windstorm mitigation of this facility will assure quicker recovery of services provided. Install protective hurricane impact resistant glass on all windows, storefronts, and skylight designed to protect against wind and flying debris damage. Design, specify and install impact resistant sliding glass doors or other hurricane protection for Miami Dade College Wolfson Campus Building 1000 windows and fourth floor sliding glass doors. Universities Colleges Miami Dade College Wolfson Campus, Bldg 5000 HURRICANE PROTECTION Future Unfunded Project Flood/Storm Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 737,407.00 77 unknown The New World School of the Arts building is home to Miami Dade College, Miami Dade Public School and University of Florida students studying the arts. Dance and art studios, a performing arts theater, administrative offices, support services, and instructional rooms are housed in Building 5000. The building has many large glass windows and doors, including one elevation with glass block, that are currently unprotected. MDC will protect the glass windows, doors, and sheer wall in vulnerable areas around the building. Installation of windstorm damage protection will mitigate hurricane and tornado damage and ensure that the campus infrastructure is able to weather a disaster. Universities Colleges Miami Dade College Wolfson Campus, bldg. 5000 BASEMENT FLOOD PROTECTION Future Unfunded Project ,Flood,Flood/Stor m Surge HMGP Identified Funding Source 203,163.00 59 10/31/2016 Unknown The basement of building 5000 is below street level. Located in the basement are instructional rooms, mechanical equipment and storage. Install a backup pump to relieve the basement of water and damage to equipment. In the case of a major flooding event, this pump will facilitate recovery of this building and mitigate associated costs. Design, specify and install a water pump at Miami Dade College Wolfson Campus Building 5000 basement. The job will include all necessary equipment, electrical, and mechanical needs. Universities Colleges St. Thomas University Electric Power redundancy Future Unfunded Project Power Failure No funding source determined at this time. 300,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown Electric power redundancy is identified as a critical node in the Vulnerability Assessment (VA)* conducted in April, 2010 (* VA funded by a U.S. Department of Education Emergency Management in Higher Education grant and prepared by The O'Gara Group in April, 2010):Presently, the university has a single power feed, which serves as the rationale for creating a redundant power feed for the campus. The Vulnerability Assessment specifically suggests configuring in redundant routing paths to enhance the reliability of service. FPL has advised that the installation of an automatic transfer switch will require $300,000. Like The City of Miami Gardens' Project 8: Burial of Power Lines, this mitigation action will assure a faster return to normal operations. Universities Colleges St. Thomas University Shuttering and Windstorm Protection of the Law School Future Unfunded Project Wind No funding source has been determined at this time. 389,635.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown The CARVER model was used to establish weighted scores for critical buildings and infrastructure, as part of St. Thomas University's Vulnerability Assessment*. The Law School building and its adjoining Library tied for #1 with another building as being the most critical to the university's operations. The building has neither shutters nor impact resistant glass windows/doors and it is a building complex that is critical to university operations (e.g., conduct of law school classes in accordance with American Bar Association guidelines). Shuttering, and Windstorm Protection initiative aims to: (a) protect every facility in the county, and (b) the protection of this critical building and its contents helps assure a faster return to normal operations. 92 of 93 258 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Active Project List Agency Type Agency ProjectTitle Status Hazards grantsource2 Funding Source EstimatedCosts BCR New Projects Date Added CompletionTimefra me ProjectDescription Universities Colleges St. Thomas University Shuttering and Windstorm Protection of the Main Library Future Unfunded Project Wind No funding source has been determined at this moment. 364,000.00 0 12/1/2012 unknown St. Thomas University's main library is a two-story masonry/metal building with windows on all sides on both stories which are not hurricane-resistant. The library houses the collection of more than 400,000 volumes, the Archbishop John C. Favalora Archive and Museum containing the history of the Archdiocese of Miami, and the archives of the University. It also contains the offices of the President of the University and the Vice President for Advancement, Marketing and Communications, which is responsible for fundraising for the university and contains all donor records. The library houses five computer laboratories containing a total of more than 200 computers and the Jorge Sardinas Art Gallery which contains the University's permanent collection and the current collection on loan, from a prominent artist, at any given time. We propose to install a total of 128 fixed or egress hurricane screens to protect all openings. The screens are Energy Star Rated, comply with Florida fire codes and meet or exceed Miami-Dade building and hurricane specifications. These fixed screens also serve as solar screens and will save money on utility bills. They will also save money on man power, as maintenance personnel will have more time to prepare the University for the storm. Universities Colleges University of Miami U of Miam Smathers Wellness Center Future Unfunded Project Power Failure Capital improvement Identified Funding Source 1,000,000.00 76 7/3/2005 Unknown Elevate critical equipment Universities Colleges University of Miami U of Miami Architecture 48 and 49 Future Unfunded Project Multiple Capital improvement Identified Funding Source 500,000.00 76 7/3/2005 Unknown Wind Mitigation and storm surge Universities Colleges University of Miami U of Miami Eaton Hall Future Unfunded Project Multiple Capital improvement Identified Funding Source 8,000,000.00 70 7/3/2005 Unknown Wind Mitigation, storm surge and power Universities Colleges University of Miami U of Miami Ferre Building Future Unfunded Project Multiple Capital improvement Identified Funding Source 500,000.00 74 7/3/2005 Unknown Wind Mitigation and storm surge Universities Colleges University of Miami U of Miami Fillmore Building Future Unfunded Project Multiple Capital improvement Identified Funding Source 500,000.00 75 7/3/2005 Unknown Wind Mitigation and storm surge Universities Colleges University of Miami U of Miami Hospital Hardening Future Unfunded Project Power Failure Capital improvement, HMGP Identified Funding Source 5,000,000.00 95 7/2/2005 Unknown Emergency power connection to CEP The University of Miami Hospital is a 560 bed hospital serving the Miami/Dade community. By connecting to the University Central Energy Power Plant, a redundancy in emergency power source would be critical for continue operations during an event resulting in power loss. Universities Colleges University of Miami U of Miami Hospital Hardening Future Unfunded Project Power Failure Capital improvement Identified Funding Source 4,000,000.00 85 7/3/2005 Unknown Connect to chill water loop from CEP. The University of Miami Hospital has 560 beds serving the community healthcare needs. This project would provide a connection to the Central Energy Plants chilled water loop so the hospital could maintain proper environmental conditions during an event. Universities Colleges University of Miami U of Miami Hospital Hardening Future Unfunded Project Storm Surge Capital improvement Identified Funding Source 4,000,000.00 94 7/3/2005 Unknown Elevate critical equipment. The University of Miami Hospital has 560 beds providing healthcare to the community. This project would relocate critical electrical equipment above the storm surge estimates to protect against a loss of power. Universities Colleges University of Miami U of Miami Law C and E Buildings Future Unfunded Project Multiple Capital improvement Identified Funding Source 500,000.00 75 7/3/2005 Unknown Wind Mitigation and storm surge Universities Colleges University of Miami U of Miami Mahoney-Pearson Future Unfunded Project Multiple Capital improvement Identified Funding Source 10,000,000.00 72 7/3/2005 Unknown Wind Mitigation and storm surge Universities Colleges University of Miami U of Miami Marine Campus Auditorium Future Unfunded Project Other,Wind Capital improvement Identified Funding Source 750,000.00 78 7/3/2005 Unknown Wind Mitigation and roof tie downs Universities Colleges University of Miami U of Miami McArthur Annex Future Unfunded Project Multiple Capital improvement Identified Funding Source 500,000.00 75 7/3/2005 Unknown Wind Mitigation and storm surge Universities Colleges University of Miami U of Miami Medical Campus CEP Future Unfunded Project Wind Capital improvement Identified Funding Source 2,000,000.00 93 7/3/2005 Unknown Wind Mitigation Universities Colleges University of Miami U of Miami Medical Campus CEP Future Unfunded Project Storm Surge Capital improvement Identified Funding Source 1,700,000.00 92 7/3/2005 Unknown Storm surge. The Central Energy Plant provides chilled water and emergency power to a number of critical healthcare and research buildings on the medical campus. Protection against storm surge would be critical to prevent a power failure due to water intrusion. Universities Colleges University of Miami U of Miami Panhellenic Building Future Unfunded Project Multiple Capital improvement Identified Funding Source 500,000.00 75 7/3/2005 Unknown Wind Mitigation and storm surge Universities Colleges University of Miami U of Miami Sewell Building Future Unfunded Project Wind Capital project Identified Funding Source 1,000,000.00 75 7/3/2005 unknown Wind Mitigation and roof tie downs Universities Colleges University of Miami U of Miami Stanford Towers Future Unfunded Project Multiple Capital improvement Identified Funding Source 10,000,000.00 72 7/3/2005 Unknown Wind Mitigation and storm surge Universities Colleges University of Miami U of Miami Volpe Building Future Unfunded Project Multiple Capital improvement Identified Funding Source 500,000.00 75 7/3/2005 Unknown Wind Mitigation and storm surge Universities Colleges University of Miami U of Miami Weeks Building Future Unfunded Project Multiple Capital improvement Identified Funding Source 500,000.00 75 7/3/2005 Unknown Wind Mitigation and storm surge Universities Colleges University of Miami Uof Miami SCCC Future Unfunded Project Wind Capital improvement Identified Funding Source 3,000,000.00 93 6/27/2005 Unknown Wind Mitigation and roof tie downs+M1F1861:T1870 93 of 93 259 Local Mitigation Strategy Whole Community Hazard Mitigation Part 3: Funding January 2015   260 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 3: Funding January 2015 P3-ii This page left intentionally blank   261 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 3: Funding January 2015 P3-iii Introduction _________________________________________________________________ v  Pre‐Disaster Funding Programs __________________________________________________ 6  Post‐Disaster Funding Programs ________________________________________________ 20  262 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 3: Funding January 2015 P3-iv This page left intentionally blank 263 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 3: Funding January 2015 P3-v Introduction This section provides a listing of some available funding sources for various types of mitigation measures. They have been divided into pre and post-disaster availability. There may be other funding opportunities that present themselves and when the LMS Coordinator is made aware of these opportunities they will be shared with the LMS Working Group. This may be used as a guide to help stakeholders identify potential funding sources. It is the responsibility of the agency pursuing funding to fill out all of the necessary documents and provide the supportive materials. The project list should be updated to reflect any funding that is being pursued or has been awarded. These funding sites may also render additional funding opportunities: Florida Mitigation Grants: http://www.floridadisaster.org/Mitigation/index.htm Federal Grants: http://www.grants.gov 264 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 3: Funding January 2015 P3-6 Pre-Disaster Funding Programs Pre‐Disaster Program Purpose Contact Time of Year Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration  To ensure the construction of projects designed to carry out aquatic restoration will improve the quality of the environment, are in the public interest, and are cost‐effective.  Focuses on designing and implementing engineering solutions that restore degraded ecosystems to a more natural condition.  U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE),Jacksonville District 701 San Marco Boulevard Jacksonville, FL 32207‐8175 Phone: (800) 291‐9405 www.saj.usace.army.mil/  Assistance to Firefighters Grant programs (AFG) AFG program awards grants directly to fire departments to enhance their ability to protect the safety of the public and firefighting personnel.  Projects can include operations and firefighter safety, firefighting vehicle acquisition, personal protective equipment, etc. The AFG programs includes Assistance to Firefighters Grant, Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response Grants, Fire Prevention and Safety Grants   http://www.fema.gov/welcome‐assistance‐firefighters‐grant‐program Beach Management Funding Assistance (formerly Beach Erosion Control Program)  Under the program, financial assistance in an amount up to 50 percent of project costs is available to Florida's county and municipal governments, community development districts, or special taxing districts for shore protection and preservation activities located on the Gulf of Mexico, Atlantic Ocean, or Straits of Florida. Eligible activities include beach restoration and nourishment activities, project design and engineering studies, environmental studies and monitoring, inlet management planning, inlet sand transfer, dune restoration and protection activities, and other beach erosion prevention related activities consistent with the adopted Strategic Beach Management Plan. The program is authorized by Section 161.101, Florida Statutes.  Florida Department of Environmental Protection  2600 Blair Stone Road – MS3500 Tallahassee, FL 32399   http://www.dep.state.fl.us/beaches/programs/becp/index.htm  FY 2015‐2016 applications were due by August 4, 2014.  265 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 3: Funding January 2015 P3-7 Pre‐Disaster Program Purpose Contact Time of Year Brownfields Economic Redevelopment Grants  EPA’s Brownfields Economic Redevelopment Initiative is designed to empower states, communities, and other stakeholders in economic redevelopment to work together in a timely manner to prevent, assess, safely clean up, and sustainable reuse Brownfields.  A "Brownfield" is a site, or portion thereof, that has actual or perceived contamination and an active potential for redevelopment or reuse.  EPA’s Brownfields Initiative strategies include funding pilot programs and other research efforts, clarifying liability issues, entering into partnerships, conducting outreach activities, developing job training programs, and addressing environmental justice concerns.  Projects are funded for two years at a total of $200,000 per project.   SuperNOFA Information Center at 1‐800‐HUD‐8929 http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/comm_planning/BEDI Clean Water Act Section 319 Grants Formula funds are awarded to states (state agencies)to implement certain non‐point source programs pursuant to Section 319(h) of the Clean Water Act, including wetland restoration.  Federal participation is limited to 60%, and an EPA‐approved State non‐point source management program is required.   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20460 http://water.epa.gov/grants_funding/  Community Assistance Program State Support Services Element (CAP‐SSSE) To ensure that communities participating in the NFIP are achieving flood loss reduction measures consistent with program direction.  The CAP‐SSSEE is intended to identify, prevent and resolve floodplain management issues in participating communities before they develop into problems requiring enforcement action. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Mitigation Directorate Program Implementation Division  500 C Street SW Washington, DC 20472 (202) 646‐2719 http://www.fema.gov/floodplain‐management/community‐assistance‐program‐state‐support‐services‐element  Coastal Partnership Initiative Grants  Provides support for innovative local coastal management projects in four program areas: public access, remarkable coastal places, working waterfronts, and community stewardship.    Florida Department of Environmental Protection  (FDEP) 3900 Commonwealth Blvd., MS 47 Tallahassee, Florida 32399 Phone: (850) 245‐2161                                            www.dep.state.fl.us/cmp/grants/index.htm   2014 opened in September and closes October 31 266 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 3: Funding January 2015 P3-8 Pre‐Disaster Program Purpose Contact Time of Year Coastal Zone Management Fund (Section 308)  Projects that improve local coastal zone management, emergency grants to State coastal zone management agencies to address disaster‐related circumstances, financial assistance for applying the public trust doctrine, etc.  Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management ‐ NOAA                                               1305 East‐West Highway                                         Silver Springs, MD 20910                                     Phone: (301) 713‐3155                                            www.oceanservice.noaa.gov   Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) The CDBG provides for long‐term needs, such as acquisition, rehabilitation or reconstruction of damaged properties and facilities and redevelopment of disaster‐affected areas.  Funds may also be used for emergency response activities, such as debris clearance and demolition, extraordinary increases in the level of necessary public services.  Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Community Planning and Development  451 7th Street, SW  Washington, DC 20410  (202) 708‐3587  http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/comm_planning/communitydevelopment/programs    Community Facilities Loan Program (10.423) To construct, enlarge, extend, or otherwise improve community facilities providing essential services to rural residents.    Rural Economic and Community Development 4440 NW 25th Place Gainesville, FL 32614 PO Box 147010 (904) 334‐3440 http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/had‐cf_grants.html Conservation and Recreation Lands (CARL) This grant program is intended to conserve environmentally endangered lands and provide resource conservation measures for other types of lands. FDEP, Division of State Lands Marjory Stoneman Douglas Bldg. 3900 Commonwealth Blvd.,  MS 100 Tallahassee, FL 32399‐3000 (850) 245‐2555 www.dep.state.fl.us/lands/   267 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 3: Funding January 2015 P3-9 Pre‐Disaster Program Purpose Contact Time of Year Derelict Vessels Removal Program Derelict Vessels in District waterways can cause navigation safety and environment problems. The District provides assistance funding up to $30,000 per county per year to assist other governments with derelict vessel removal projects. Florida Inland Navigation District  http://aicw.org/vessel_removal.jsp  Disaster Preparedness Improvement Grant (DPIG)  Assist states in developing and improving state and local plans, programs,and capabilities for disaster preparedness and mitigation.  Provides for grants not to exceed 50% of the cost of improving, maintaining and updating these plans (not to exceed $50,000 per year to any state).   Business Recovery Loans EDA Public Works & Infrastructure Development Grants  This program is designed to promote long‐term economic development and assist in the construction of public works and development facilities needed to initiate and support the creation or retention of permanent jobs in the private sector in areas experiencing substantial economic distress.  Project proposals must be located within an economically distressed EDA designated area and be in conformance with an Overall Economic Development Program (OEDP) for the eligible area.  Projects must also contribute to long‐term economic development of the area by creating or retaining permanent jobs and raising income levels.  Examples of projects include 1) Infrastructure for industrial park development; 2) port development and expansion; 3) infrastructure necessary for economic development (e.g. water/sewer facilities); 4) renovation and recycling of old industrial buildings; 5) construction of vocational‐technical facilities and skill centers; and 6) construction of incubator facilities.  Project costs range widely, with an average of over $850,000 and federal funding generally allocated to cover 50% of project costs (80% funding may be granted in special cases).  Economic Development Administration1401 Constitution Avenue, NW Suite 71014 Washington, DC 20230 202‐482‐2900 http://www.eda.gov/disasterrecovery.htm Emergency Advance Measures For Flood Prevention To perform activities prior of flooding or flood fight that would assist in protecting against loss of life and damages to property due to flooding. USACEAttn: CECW – OE Washington, DC 20314 (202) 272‐0251 Emergency Management Program Assistance (EMPA) Purpose of program is to administer the Emergency Management Preparedness and Assistant Trust Fund, count base grants, and incoming federal, state, or private funding.  Within this program is the Municipal Grant Program.  Cities can apply for up to $50,000 worth of grant money.  Also included, is the Open Competitive Grant Program in which cities, counties, not for profits, etc. can apply for up to $300,000 in grant money. Emergency Management Program Assistance 2555 Shumard Oaks Blvd.,  Tallahassee, FL 32399‐2100  (850) 413‐9966 268 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 3: Funding January 2015 P3-10 Pre‐Disaster Program Purpose Contact Time of Year Emergency Management Performance Grant  Grants are provided to municipalities with a population of 100,000 or less, are legally constituted, have an authorized, established, and maintained emergency management program, as well as a signed current Statewide Mutual Aid Agreement (SMAA). Florida Division of Emergency Management (FDEM) 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399‐2100 Phone: (850) 413‐9969                                            www.floridadisaster.org/cps/grants.htm#CompetitiveGrant  Expanded Local Management Hazardous Waste Program The primary purpose of this fund is to cover costs incurred to establish the expanded local hazardous waste management program as stated in FS403.7238 including training for county personnel, materials & equipment for educational activities. FDEP 2600 Blair Stone Rd.  Tallahassee, FL 32399 (850) 488‐0300 Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Grant Program  To improve emergency management and preparedness capabilities by supporting flexible, sustainable, secure, and interoperable EOCs with a focus on addressing identified deficiencies and needs.   FEMA                                                                           500 C Street SW                                          Washington, D.C. 20472                                      Phone: (800) 621‐3362    www.fema.gov  The Federal Assistance for Beach Re‐nourishment Program Provides up to 65% of the costs to re‐nourish beaches and for up to 50 years of periodic maintenance. Southeast Atlantic Division USACE Jacksonville District  (904) 232‐1697 FEMA Pre‐Disaster Mitigation Grant Program (PDM) The PDM program was authorized by Section §203 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Stafford Act), as amended by Section §102 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000, to assist communities to implement hazard mitigation programs designed to reduce overall risk to the population and structures before the next disaster occurs.   FDEM2555 Shumard Oak Blvd., Tallahassee, FL 32399‐2100 (850) 413‐9966  http://www.fema.gov/hazard‐mitigation‐assistance  2014 opened 4/21 and closed 7/25 Fire Prevention and Safety Grants This program supports projects that enhance the safety of the public and firefighters from fire and related hazards. The primary goal is to reduce injury and prevent death among high‐risk populations.   http://www.fema.gov/fire‐prevention‐safety‐grants  269 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 3: Funding January 2015 P3-11 Pre‐Disaster Program Purpose Contact Time of Year Flood Control Projects To reduce flood damages through projects not specifically authorized by Congress. Commander US Army Corps of Engineers  Attn: CECW – OE  Washington, DC 20314  (202) 272‐1975 Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) To fund cost effective measures to States and communities that reduce or eliminate the long term risk of flood damage to buildings, manufactured homes, and other insurable structures. Program Implementation Division FEMA  500 C Street SW  Washington, DC 20472 (202) 646‐3619 10/18/13Flood Plain Management Services To promote appropriate recognition of flood hazards in land and water use planning and development through the provision of flood and flood plain related data, technical services, and guidance. USACEAttn: CECW – PF  Washington, DC 20314 (202) 272‐0169 Florida Beach Erosion Control Program  To work in concert with local, state and federal government entities to achieve protection, preservation and restoration of coastal and sandy beach resources of the state.  Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems              FDEP                                                          3900 Commonwealth Blvdl, MS 300      Tallahassee, FL 32399‐3000               Phone: (850) 922‐7703                      www.dep.state.fl.us/beach  Florida Coastal Management Program  Provides funding for projects contributing to the protection, management and enhancement of Florida’s ocean and coastal resources including: natural resource protection and management; hazard mitigation; shoreline erosion and land subsidence; and ocean resource management.  Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems FDEP    3900 Commonwealth Blvd, MS 300       Tallahassee, FL 32399‐3000              Phone: (850) 922‐7703                      www.dep.state.fl.us/beach  Florida Communities Trust (FCT) This grant program facilitates the purchase of lands for conservation and/or recreation purposes by local governments.  This land acquisition program helps to implement conservation, recreation, open space, and coastal elements of local comprehensive plans.    Programs provide funding to local governments and eligible non‐profit organizations to acquire land for parks, open space, greenways and projects supporting Florida's seafood harvesting and aquaculture industries. FDEPFlorida Forever Project 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard M.S. 100   Tallahassee, Florida 32399   850‐245‐2555 (phone) 850‐245‐2572 (fax) http://www.dep.state.fl.us/lands/FL_Communities_Trust/default_cont.htm  270 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 3: Funding January 2015 P3-12 Pre‐Disaster Program Purpose Contact Time of Year Grants & Loans for Public Works & Development Facilities To provide financial assistance for the construction of public facilities needed to initiate and encourage the creation or retention of permanent jobs in the private sector in designated areas where economic growth is lagging. Economic Development Administration  The Federal Building  Room 423  80 N. Hughey Ave.  Orlando, FL 32801  (407) 648‐6572 http://www.eda.gov/funding‐opportunities/index.htm  Hazardous Materials Training Program for Implementation of the Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986 The goal of the SARA Title III Training Program is to make funding available to support programs of State, local, and Tribal governments, and university sponsored programs designed to improve emergency planning, preparedness, mitigation, response, and recovery capabilities.  These programs must provide special emphasis on emergencies associated with hazardous chemicals. FEMA Mitigation Directorate Program Implementation Division  500 C Street SW Washington, DC 20472 (202) 646‐2719 HOME Investment Partnerships Program  Formula grants provide up to 75% federal assistance to states, local governments, and urban counties for permanent and transitional housing for low‐income persons.  HOME funds can assist renters, new homebuyers, and existing homeowners with acquisition, new construction, rehabilitation, and tenant‐based rental assistance.  Florida Housing Finance Corporation227 N. Bronough St. Suite 5000 Tallahassee, FL 32301‐1367 Phone: (850) 488‐4197 Fax: (850) 488‐9809  http://apps.floridahousing.org/StandAlone/FHFC_ECM/ContentPage.aspx?PAGE=0180   Hospital Preparedness Program  Funding is used to support public health emergency preparedness through enhanced planning, increasing integration and improving infrastructure.  US Department of Health and Human Services http://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/planning/hpp/Pages/funding.aspx  National Fire Plan – Wildland Urban Interface Assist communities at risk from catastrophic wildland fires by providing assistance in the following areas:  1. Assessment and planning Department of Interior271 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 3: Funding January 2015 P3-13 Pre‐Disaster Program Purpose Contact Time of Year Community Fire Assistance 2. Mitigation activities3. Community and homeowner education  4. Plan and implement hazardous fuels reduction activities 5. Enhance local and small business employment opportunities for rural communities 6. Enhance the knowledge and fire protection capability of rural fire districts by providing assistance in education and training, protective clothing and equipment purchase, and mitigation methods on a cost share basis.    https://www.cfda.gov/index?s=program&mode=form&tab=core&id=8de4ed6487e60924203bb324fcba62c5  National Hurricane Program To reduce the loss of life, property, economic disruption, and disaster assistance costs resulting from hurricanes through conducting Hurricane Evacuation Studies (HES) FEMAProgram Implementation Division  Mitigation Directorate  500 C Street SW  Washington, DC 20472  (202) 646‐4621         Land and Water Conservation Fund Program  LWCF is a competitive program which provides grants for acquisition or development of land for public outdoor recreation use.  FDEPDivision of Recreation & Parks 3900 Commonwealth Blvd., MS 585 Tallahassee, Florida 32399‐3000 Phone: (850) 245‐2501                                            www.dep.state.fl.us/parks/OIRS/factslwcf.htm      272 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 3: Funding January 2015 P3-14 Pre‐Disaster Program Purpose Contact Time of Year Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Program (LETPP)  LETPP provides resources to law enforcement and public safety communities to support critical terrorism prevention activities, including establishing and enhancing fusion centers and collaborating with non‐law enforcement partners, other government agencies and the private sector.  Department of Homeland Security/FEMA, Grant Programs 245 Murray Lane Bldg. #410 Washington, District of Columbia 20531  1‐800‐368‐6498 Livable Communities Initiative  Nationally competitive program, generally $1 million in federal support requiring 20% local match.  Federal Transit Administration     (212) 264‐8162 Region II  26 Federal Plaza, Suite 2940 New York, NY 10278‐0194 http://www.fta.dot.gov/13747_11003.html  National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) To enable individuals to purchase insurance against losses from physical damage to or loss of buildings and or contents therein caused by floods, mudflow, or flood‐related erosion, and to promote wise floodplain management practices in the nation’s flood prone areas. Claim and Underwriting Division Flood Insurance Administration (FIA)   FEMA  500 C Street SW  Washington, DC 20472  (202) 646‐3422 North American Wetland Conservation Fund  The US Fish and Wildlife Service provides up to 50% federal funds to stimulate public‐private partnerships to protect, restore, and manage a diversity of wetland habitats for migratory birds and other wildlife in the United States, Canada, and Mexico.  Department of Interiorhttp://www.doi.gov/partnerships/tools/stories/north‐american‐wetlands‐conservation‐fund.cfm  Payments to States in Lieu of Real Estate Taxes To compensate local taxing units for the loss of taxes from federally acquired lands, 75 percent of all monies received or deposited in the Treasury during any fiscal year for the account of leasing of lands acquired by the United States for flood control, navigation and allied purposes, including the development of hydroelectric power, are paid at the end of each year to the States in Which such property is situated. Department of Interior 202‐208‐3078  http://www.doi.gov/pilt/index.cfm  273 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 3: Funding January 2015 P3-15 Pre‐Disaster Program Purpose Contact Time of Year Partners for Fish and Wildlife  The US Fish and Wildlife Service provides financial and technical assistance to private landowners, businesses, and local governments interested in restoring wetlands and riparian habitats on their land.  http://www.fws.gov/partners/resourceBenefits.html  Planning Assistance to States  Section 22 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1974 allows the USACE to assist state, tribal, and local governments in the preparation of comprehensive plans for the development, utilization, and conservation of water and related land resources with up to 50% federal match.    Technical and planning assistance may include studies for wetlands evaluation, flood damage reduction, flood plain management, and water quality/quantity.  USACEJacksonville District 701 San Marco Boulevard Jacksonville, FL 32207‐8175 Phone: (800) 291‐9405 http://www.saj.usace.army.mil/    Pre‐Disaster Mitigation Program (PDM) The PDM program provides an approximate total of $150,000,000 dollars (or other amount as appropriated by Congress) annually on a nationally competitive basis to put mitigation initiatives in place prior to a disaster event.  Each project may receive 75% of project cost as the federal share not to exceed $3,000,000 for the federal share.  This program is administered through the state Division of Emergency Management.  Department of Homeland Security –FEMA500 C Street SW Washington, DC 20472  (202) 646‐2500  http://www.fema.gov/pre‐disaster‐mitigation‐grant‐program  In 2014 the funding cycle opened on 5/30 and closed on 7/25 Protection, Clearing and Straightening Channels To restore channels for purposes of navigation or flood control.Commander USACE  Attn: CECW – OE  Washington, DC 20314  (202) 272‐1975 Protection of Essential Highways, Highway Bridge Approaches, and Public Works To provide bank protection of highways, highway bridges, essential public works, churches, hospitals, schools, and other nonprofit public services endangered by flood caused erosion. USACEAttn: CECW – PF  Washington, DC 20314 (202) 272‐0169 Public Works Impact Projects To provide financial assistance in the construction of public facilities for the purpose of providing immediate useful work to unemployed and underemployed persons in designated project areas. Economic Development Administration  The Federal Building  Room 423  274 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 3: Funding January 2015 P3-16 Pre‐Disaster Program Purpose Contact Time of Year Program (PWIP) (11.304) 80 N. Hughey Ave. Orlando, FL 32801  (407) 648‐6572 http://www.eda.gov/funding‐opportunities/  Residential Construction Mitigation Program (RCMP)  Promote wind mitigation through education and hazard mitigation upgrades to residents.  Florida Division of Emergency Management 850‐413‐9946 http://www.floridadisaster.org/Mitigation/RCMP/index.htm  Rivers, Trails, and Conservation Assistance Program The National Parks Service provides staff consultants and technical assistance for river and trail corridor planning and for open space preservation efforts.  http://www.nps.gov/orgs/rtca/apply.htm August 1 deadline  Snagging and Clearing for Flood Control To reduce flood damage.USACEAttn: CECW – PF  Washington, DC 20314 (202) 272‐0169 Section 533 – Housing Preservation Grant Program Provide loans, grants, interest reduction payments or other assistance to very low and low income homeowners, owners of single or multiple unit rental properties or for the benefit of owners of consumer cooperative housing projects. Can be used to reduce costs of repair and rehabilitation, to remove or correct health or safety hazards, comply with applicable development standards or codes or to make needed repairs.  http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/HAD‐HPG_Grants.html  275 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 3: Funding January 2015 P3-17 Pre‐Disaster Program Purpose Contact Time of Year Section 5307 Urban Formula/Transportation Enhancements  Section 5307 (formerly Section 9) Urban Formula Grants are designated for transit capital and operating assistance in urbanized areas.  Any transit‐related capital or operating expense is eligible for federal funding, requiring a 20% local capital match and up to 50% operating match.  Each year, 1% of the Section 5307 appropriation is set aside for transit‐related transportation enhancements.  http://www.fta.dot.gov/map21/ Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program  HUD offers CDBG recipients guaranteed loan funds to acquire real property, relocate homeowners and businesses, rehabilitate publicly owned real property (including infrastructure), housing rehabilitation, and economic development.   https://www.hudexchange.info/section‐108/section‐108‐program‐eligibility‐requirements/  Small Watershed Program (PL‐566 Operations Phase) The objective of this program is to provide technical and financial assistance in carrying out works of improvement to protect, develop, and utilize the land and water resources in small watersheds.  Funding is available to any state agency, county or groups of counties, municipality, town or township, soil and water conservation district, flood prevention or flood control district, Indian tribe or tribal organization, or any other nonprofit agency with authority under state law to carry out, maintain, and operate watershed works of improvement may apply for assistance.  Program funds may pay for up to 100% of flood prevention costs and requires preparation of an approved watershed plan.   http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/nd/programs/?cid=nrcs141p2_001682  Residential Construction Mitigation Program (RCMP) Funds are used for programs to improve wind resistance of residences and mobile homes, including loans, subsidies, grants demonstration projects, and direct assistance; cooperative programs with local governments and the Federal Government; and other efforts to prevent or reduce losses or reduce the cost of rebuilding after a disaster.  FDEM2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399‐2100 Phone: (850) 922‐4454                                                                                         www.floridadisaster.org/mitigation/rcmp/   Smart Growth Implementation Assistance (SGIA) Program EPA solicits applications from state, local,regional, and tribal governments (and non‐profits that have partnered with a governmental entity) that want to incorporate smart growth techniques into their future development. Once selected, communities receive direct Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Pease contact Abby Hall (hall.abby@epa.gov, 202‐566‐2086) or see the frequently asked questions for SGIA:  276 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 3: Funding January 2015 P3-18 Pre‐Disaster Program Purpose Contact Time of Year technical assistance from a team of national experts in one of two areas: policy analysis (e.g., zoning codes, school siting guidelines, transportation policies) or public participatory processes (e.g., visioning, design workshops, alternatives analysis). EPA tailors the assistance to the community's unique situation and priorities and provides the contractor team. This is not a grant. Through a site visit and a report, the multidisciplinary teams help the community achieve its goal of encouraging growth that fosters economic progress and environmental protection. http://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/sgia_faq.htm.  Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) Grants The program was created to provide funding directly to fire departments and volunteer firefighter interest organizations to help them increase or maintain the number of trained, “front line” firefighters available in their communities.   http://www.fema.gov/staffing‐adequate‐fire‐emergency‐response‐grants State Homeland Security Program (SHSP)  This core assistance program provides funds to build capabilities at the state and local levels through planning, equipment, and training and exercise activities.  SHSP also supports the implementation of state homeland security strategies and key elements of the national preparedness architecture, including the National Preparedness Goal, the National Incented Management System and the National Response plan.  http://www.fema.gov/fy‐2014‐homeland‐security‐grant‐program‐hsgp  Sustainable Development Challenge Grant (SDCG)  Funding for Community Challenge Grants to foster reform and reduce barriers to achieve affordable, economically vital, and sustainable communities. EPA Office of Regional Operations and State/Local Relations (1501)                                            401 M Street SW                                            Washington, D.C. 20460                                  Phone: (202) 260‐2740                                            www.epa.gov  Transit Capital Investment Program / Section 5309 Capital Funds  The transit capital investment program (49 U.S.C. 5309) provides capital assistance for three primary activities: (1) new and replacement buses and facilities,  (2) modernization of existing rail systems, and (3) new fixed guideway systems (New Starts).   Federal Transit Administration                       Office of Program Management                         East Building                                                               1200 New Jersey Ave. SE                                 Washington, DC 20590                                             Phone: (202) 366‐4020                    http://www.fta.dot.gov/12347_5221.html 277 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 3: Funding January 2015 P3-19 Pre‐Disaster Program Purpose Contact Time of Year   Unified Hazard Mitigation Assistance  Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) provides funding for eligible mitigation activities that reduce disaster losses and protect life and property from future disaster damages – including the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), Pre‐Disaster Mitigation (PDM) and Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) http://www.fema.gov/grants Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI)  UASI focuses on the unique planning, equipment, training and exercise needs of high‐threat, high‐density urban areas.  It assists them in building sustainable capacity to prevent, protect, respond and recover form acts of terrorism.  In FY 2007 there was $746,900,000 available in UASI grants.  http://www.fema.gov/fy‐2014‐urban‐areas‐security‐initiative‐uasi‐nonprofit‐security‐grant‐program‐nsgp  Waterways Assistance Program  Waterway related projects must be located on natural, navigable waterways within the District. Eligible waterway related projects include navigation channel dredging, channel markers, navigation signs or buoys, boat ramps, docking facilities, fishing & viewing piers, waterfront boardwalks, inlet management, environmental education, law enforcement equipment, boating safety programs, beach re‐nourishment, dredge material management, environmental mitigation, and shoreline stabilization. Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) http://aicw.org/wapapp_pdf.jhtml?method=view&wapapp_pdf.id=1   278 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 3: Funding January 2015 P3-20 Post-Disaster Funding Programs Post‐Disaster Program Purpose Contact    Beach Erosion Control Projects To control public beach and shore erosion through projects not specifically authorized by Congress  . Funding: First $100,000 USACE; remainder 50/50 between USACE and Non‐Federal   USACE                                                                          Attn: CECW‐PB, DOD                                                20 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.                            Washington, DC 20314                                             Phone: (202) 761‐7674                             www.usace.army.mil Capital Fund Emergency/ Natural Disaster Funding  To provide for needed repairs in excess of reimbursement from insurance and other sources, such as FEMA. Armando FanaHUD  Miami Field Office 909 SE First Ave Miami, FL 33131 Phone: (305) 536‐5678  http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/public_indian_housing/programs/ph/capfund/emfunding   Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery Program  In response to Presidentially declared disasters, Congress may appropriate additional funding for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program as Disaster Recovery grants to rebuild the affected areas and provide crucial seed money to start the recovery process. Since CDBG Disaster Recovery (CDBG‐DR) assistance may fund a broad range of recovery activities, HUD can help communities and neighborhoods that otherwise might not recover due to limited resources. https://www.hudexchange.info/cdbg‐dr/279 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 3: Funding January 2015 P3-21 Post‐Disaster Program Purpose Contact Emergency Operations Flood Response and Post Flood Response To provide emergency flood response and post flood response assistance as required to supplement State and local efforts and capabilities in time of flood coastal storm. Commander USACE Attn: CECW‐ OE  Washington, DC 20314‐1000  (202) 272‐0251 Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection To prevent erosion damages to public facilities by the emergency construction or repair of streambank and shoreline protection works.   USACE 20 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.                            Washington, DC 20314                                             Phone: (202) 761‐0001                                            www.usace.army.mil          Emergency Watershed Protection  To assist sponsors in implementing emergency recovery measures to relieve imminent hazards to life and property created by a natural disaster that causes a sudden impairment of a watershed. Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS)                  PO Box 2890                                                  Washington, DC 20013                                             Phone: (202) 720‐3527               www.fl.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/flewp.html Federal Emergency Shelter Grants Program for the Homeless Grants for the provision of emergency shelter and essential support services to the homeless.  Funds may be used for structural improvements to shelters, shelter operating expenses, furnishings and equipment, and other services. Benefit Recovery & Special Program Economic Services Program  1317 Winewood Blvd.  Tallahassee, FL 32399 (850) 487‐2966 Florida Beach Erosion Control Program FDEM works with local, state or federal governments to support eligible activities including beach restoration, and nourishment activities, project design and engineering studies, environmental studies and monitoring, inlet management planning, inlet sand transfer, dune restoration and protection activities, dune walkover construction and other beach erosion prevention‐related activities. Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems               FDEP                                                         3900 Commonwealth Blvd, MS 300      Tallahassee, FL 32399‐3000              Phone: (850) 922‐7703    www.dep.state.fl.us/beach 280 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 3: Funding January 2015 P3-22 Post‐Disaster Program Purpose Contact Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) To prevent future losses of lives and property due to disaster; to implement State or local hazard mitigation plans; to enable mitigation measures to be implemented during immediate recovery from a disaster; and to provide funding for previously identified mitigation measures to benefit the disaster area. Director   Program Implementation Division  Mitigation Directorate  FEMA  500 C Street SW  Washington, DC 20472  (202) 646‐4621 HOME Investment Partnership Program To provide assistance for the acquisition of real property for affordable housing, demolition and clearance for a housing activity, housing construction and reconstruction, and rehabilitation of housing. HUDBroward County Mr. Fred Shepherd, Coordinator Community Development 110 N. E. 3rd Street Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 765‐5316 Fax: (954) 765‐4686  http://www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/affordablehousing/programs/home/ Public Assistance Program To provide supplemental assistance to States, local governments, and certain private nonprofit organizations to alleviate suffering and hardship resulting from major disasters or emergencies declared by the President.  PA provides funding for the repair, restoration, reconstruction, or replacement of a public facility or infrastructure damaged or destroyed by a disaster.   This includes PA 406, non‐competitive mitigation grants, which fund up to 100% more than the pre‐disaster repair cost estimate. Submitted and approved on the Project Worksheet. Infrastructure Support Division  Response and Recovery Directorate  FEMA  500 C Street SW  Washington, DC 20472  (202) 646‐3026 281 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 3: Funding January 2015 P3-23 Post‐Disaster Program Purpose Contact Public Works and Economic Development Program To support the construction or rehabilitation of essential public infrastructure and facilities necessary to generate or retain private sector jobs and investments, attract private sector capital, and promote regional competitiveness.  Eligible activities include the acquisition or development of public land and improvements for use in public works, public services, or development facilities. Economic Development Administration     Atlanta Office                                                             401 West Peachtree Street, NW Suite 1820 Atlanta, GA 30308‐3510 Phone: (404) 730‐3002  www.eda.gov   The Office Depot Foundation Grants   The Office Depot Foundation supports nonprofit organizations, government agencies, libraries, and schools that bring systemic change to the communities they serve. The Foundation provides grants in three distinct categories: (1) the Giving Children Tools for Success category focuses on activities that give young people tools to succeed in school and in life through education and inspiration, (2) the Building Capacity to Serve Communities category targets programs that help nonprofit organizations to serve the needs of their communities efficiently, and (3) the Disaster Preparedness, Relief, Recovery, and Rebuilding category supports efforts that help people and communities prepare for disasters and rebuild and recover when disasters occur. Potential applicants should access the online eligibility survey. Applications are retrieved on a monthly basis and are reviewed by a committee. Allow at least 12 weeks after you submit your completed application to receive a response. Applications are only accepted from organizations that can provide proof of qualifying non‐profit status, including a tax‐exempt determination letter from the Internal Revenue Service or proof of the organization's charitable purpose. Average Award: $1,000.      http://www.officedepotfoundation.org/funding.asp  http://officedepotfoundation.org/?page_id=237  282 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 3: Funding January 2015 P3-24 Post‐Disaster Program Purpose Contact Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation  This foundation aims to provide funding, life‐saving equipment, disaster assistance, and educational opportunities for first responders and public safety organizations. Organizations will receive priority for funding if they are located within 60 miles of a Firehouse Subs restaurant. Organizations that have already received funding from the foundation must wait a minimum of one year before submitting another application. It is recommended that the organization is located within 60 miles of a Firehouse Subs restaurant. If the applicant‐organization has already received funding from the Foundation, you must wait a minimum of one year before submitting another application. There is no award or request ceiling, but average funding ranges from $10,000 to $20,000.   http://www.firehousesubs.com/FirehouseSubs/files/d0/d0a96b91‐0d90‐4186‐b94a‐457e1cfb2b5e.pdf  Lawrence Foundation Environmental, Education, and Human Services Projects   The Lawrence Foundation awards grants in support of the environment, education, human services, disaster relief, and other causes. Applications are accepted twice a year. The foundation awards both program and operating grants with no geographic restrictions to 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations, as well as public schools and libraries. Award ceiling not specified.    http://www.thelawrencefoundation.org/grants/guidelines.php   11/1/2013 State Farm Youth Advisory Board Grants   This grant program provides funding for service‐learning grants that focus on one of the following issue areas: Community Safety and Natural Disaster Preparedness; Access to higher education/closing the achievement gap; Financial literacy; Environmental responsibility; and Social Health and Wellness issues. To be eligible to receive a grant, applying organizations must be a public K‐12, charter, or higher education institution or school district; non‐profit organizations including government entities are also eligible if they are able to demonstrate how they plan to impact student achievement within the public K‐12 curriculum. All applicants must have a youth contact and adult administrator, as the programs must be youth‐driven and youth‐led. Award Ceiling: $100,000.   http://www.statefarmyab.com/issues/community‐safety‐and‐natural‐disaster‐preparedness   Cisco Systems Community Impact Cash Community Impact Cash Grants support the unmet needs of underserved communities in the areas of Education and Critical Human Needs. Individual grants help improve literacy and science instruction or increase the number of http://csr.cisco.com/pages/community‐impact‐cash‐grants   283 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 3: Funding January 2015 P3-25 Post‐Disaster Program Purpose Contact Grants to Support Education and Critical Needs   graduates in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) fields. The program also supports organizations, projects, and initiatives designed to help residents meet their basic needs for food, shelter, disaster response, water, access to healthcare, and/or breaking the cycle of poverty. To be considered for a Community Impact grant, organizations must have 501(c)(3) tax‐exempt status from the Internal Revenue Service and must serve a constituency that is economically underserved relative to median income level in the target geography. Community Impact Cash Grants are available to qualifying organizations within a fifty‐mile radius of major Cisco communities, including Bangalore, India; Boxborough, Massachusetts; Lawrenceville, Georgia; Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; Richardson, Texas; San Jose, California; Shanghai/Beijing, China; and Toronto, Canada. Award Ceiling: $15,000.  Revolving Fund Loan Program for Waste Water Treatment (Includes Stormwater Facilities) Provides funding to assist in the financing of publicly owned waste water and stormwater treatment collection, transmission, disposal, and reclamation, re‐use facilities as well as infiltration/inflow correction.  Project loans are for up to 20 years at interest rates that are over 60% below market rate.   Pollution Control Bond Program This program provides loans to local governments for construction of stormwater, water and wastewater facilities.  Special districts are eligible as well as municipalities and county governments.  Available funding is up to $300 million a year and the source of the funds are bonds sold by the state.  Plans and specifications of proposed facilities are required.  The loan interest rate is a pass through rate.  284 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 3: Funding January 2015 P3-26 Post‐Disaster Program Purpose Contact Waterway Assistance Program & Cooperative Assistance Program  Waterway related projects must be located on natural, navigable waterways within the district.  Eligible waterway related projects include navigation channel dredging, channel markers, navigation signs or buoys, boat ramps, docking facilities, fishing & viewing piers, waterfront boardwalks, inlet management, environmental education, law enforcement equipment, boating safety programs, beach re‐nourishment, dredge material management, environmental mitigation, and shoreline stabilization.   Florida Inland Navigation District  http://aicw.org/capapp_pdf.jhtml?method=view&capapp_pdf.id=1  285 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 3: Funding January 2015 P3-27 This page left intentionally blank 286 Local Mitigation Strategy Whole Community Hazard Mitigation Part 4: The Appendices January 2018 287 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-ii This page left intentionally blank. 288 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-iii PART 4 - THE APPENDICES Appendix A: List of LMS Changes ....................................................................... 2 Appendix B: LMS Working Group and Subcommittee Agencies 2017 ............ 3 Appendix C: LMS Committees .............................................................................. 6 Appendix D: Miami-Dade Resolution Adopting the LMS .................................... 8 Appendix E: State Letter Approving the Local Mitigation Strategy.................. 12 Appendix F: FEMA Letter Approving the Local Mitigation Strategy ............... 14 Appendix G: Metropolitan Form of Government ............................................... 16 Appendix H: Integration Document .................................................................... 20 The plans reviewed included ............................................................................... 20 Miami –Dade Emergency Management Recovery Plan ..................................... 69 Miami-Dade 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) .............................. 70 Florida Administrative Code 73C-40.0256 .......................................................... 72 Appendix I: Community Profile .......................................................................... 75 Appendix J: Economic Assessment .................................................................. 77 Appendix K: Maps................................................................................................. 85 Appendix L: 2016 Community Survey ................................................................. 91 289 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-1 This page left intentionally blank. 290 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-2 Appendix A: List of LMS Changes 2016 Changes Section Name Date Change Made Purpose LMS Revisions Since Last Adoption January 2017 Updated Annual update Municipal Integration of Mitigation Measures January 2017 Updated Annual update Hazard Identification and Vulnerability Assessment January 2017 Update • Part 1 – (P1-83) Erosion due to Hurricane Matthew • Part 1 – (P1-98-99) 2016 Storms • Part 1 – Table 9 – updated Mobile Home Park list • Part 1 – (P1-112) 2016 King Tide events • Part 1 – (P1-121) 2016 Severe Storm event • Part 1 – (P1-124) 2016 Tornado event Update with annual statistics and recent events Part 2 Appendix 2 Deleted/ Deferred 01/05/2017 Updated list with 2016 status Annual Update Projects 01/20/2017 Annual Update to Projects Annual Update Part 3 None Part 4 Appendices Appendix B January 2017 Updated Active Member Agency list Deleted individual name section Annual Update Part 5 Meeting Minutes 12/21/2016 Updated Section with all minutes from 2016 meetings and attendance Annual Update Part 6 Completed Projects 01/04/2017 Updated Appendices 2 and 3 Annual Update Part 7 Flooding – The NFIP and CRS January 2017 Updated the Rainy Season and Flood Events sections with 2016 information, and Appendix A: Public Information. Annual Update 291 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-3 Appendix B: LMS Working Group and Subcommittee Agencies 2017 1 Coordinator/Chair: Cathie Perkins, Miami-Dade Office Emergency Management Co- Chair: Lourdes Rodriguez, Town of Miami Lakes Colleges and Universities Florida International University International Hurricane Research Center St. Thomas University University of Miami Miami Dade College Miami-Dade County Departments Miami-Dade Animal Services Miami-Dade Community Action and Human Services Miami-Dade Finance Miami Dade Fire Rescue Office of Emergency Management Miami-Dade-Internal Services General Services Administration Miami-Dade Information Technology Department Miami Dade-Library Miami-Dade - Management and Budget Office of Grants Coordination Miami-Dade Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces Miami-Dade Police Department Miami- Dade Public Housing and Community Development Miami-Dade Public Works Miami-Dade Port of Miami Miami –Dade Regulatory and Economic Resources Office of Resilience Permitting Planning and Zoning (P&Z) Miami-Dade Solid Waste Miami-Dade Transit Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department Vizcaya Museum and Gardens Miami-Dade County Public Schools State Agencies Florida Division of Emergency Management 1 EMAP (2016) 4.2.4 292 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-4 Federal Agencies Federal Emergency Management Agency National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration US Army Hospitals and Health Care Baptist Health Citrus Health Jackson Health Systems Miami Beach Community Health Center Mount Sinai Hospital Niklaus Childrens Hospital Municipalities Aventura Bal Harbour Bay Harbor Biscayne Park Coral Gables Cutler Bay Doral El Portal Florida City Golden Beach Hialeah Hialeah Gardens Homestead Key Biscayne Medley Miami Miami Beach Miami Gardens Miami Lakes Miami Shores Miami Springs North Bay Village North Miami North Miami Beach Opa Locka Palmetto Bay Pinecrest South Miami Sunny Isles 293 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-5 Surfside Sweetwater Virginia Gardens West Miami Regional Broward County Emergency Management South Florida Water Management District Private Sector/Businesses FPL Pybas Enterprises Other Mactown DSI Chapman Partnership Private Citizens 294 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-6 Appendix C: LMS Committees Local Mitigation Strategy Steering Committee: 2017 Ricardo Alvarez, Mitigat Ken Capezzuto, University of Miami Steve Detwiler, Business Recovery Program Mike Gambino, Rising Waters Consulting Hugh Gladwin, Florida International University Theresa Grandal, Miami Dade College Nichole Hefty, Miami-Dade Office of Resilience Stacy Kilroy, Mount Sinai Medical Center Michael Nardone, AMEC Cathie Perkins, Miami-Dade Office of Emergency Management Don Pybas, Private Citizen Robert Molleda, National Weather Service Jeff Robinson, Hurricane Protection Inc. Lourdes Rodriguez, Town of Miami Lakes Erik Salna, International Hurricane Research Center Armando Villaboy, South Florida Water Management District LMS Sub- Committees Agriculture and Landscaping Education and Outreach Extreme Weather Events Financial and Grants Flooding and CRS Marine Interests Structural 295 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-7 This page left intentionally blank. 296 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-8 Appendix D: Miami-Dade Resolution Adopting the LMS Miami Dade County Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. R-683-15 Resolution Adopting the Local Mitigation Strategy On June 6, 2000, the Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners formally adopted the Local Mitigation Strategy as official county policy. The Board of County Commissioners renewed their commitment to the LMS on September 1, 2015, after the State’s conditional approval of the 2015 LMS update. 297 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-9 298 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-10 299 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-11 This page left intentionally blank. 300 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-12 Appendix E: State Letter Approving the Local Mitigation Strategy 301 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-13 This page left intentionally blank. 302 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-14 Appendix F: FEMA Letter Approving the Local Mitigation Strategy 303 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-15 304 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-16 Appendix G: Metropolitan Form of Government Miami-Dade County has a unique metropolitan form of government, which varies greatly from typical county powers, in that it provides for resolutions, laws, rules, regulations passed by the county to be fully and automatically inclusive of all municipalities within the County. Specific lines in the Charter that would apply to a document such as the LMS (which is adopted by resolution) being automatically applicable to all municipalities are: Section 1.01. Board of County Commissioners: Powers Section 1.01, A, 5: Prepared and enforce comprehensive plans for the development of the county. (LMS is a part of the Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan) Section 1.01, A, 21: Exercise all powers and privileges granted to municipalities, counties, and county officers by the Constitution and laws of the state, and all powers no prohibited by the Constitution or by this Charter Section 1.01, A, 22: Adopt such ordinances and resolutions as may be required in the exercise of its powers, and prescribe fines and penalties for the violation of ordinances Section 6.02. Municipalities: Municipal Powers Each municipality shall have the authority to exercise all powers relating to its local affairs not inconsistent with this Charter. Each municipality may provide for higher standards of zoning, service, and regulation than those provided by the Board of County Commissioners in order that its individual character and standards may be preserved for its citizens. Section 9.04 General Provisions: Supremacy ClauseThis Charter and the ordinances adopted hereunder shall in cases of conflict supersede all municipal charters and ordinances, except as herein provided, and where authorized by the Constitution, shall in cases of conflict supersede all special and general laws of the state. Specific lines in the Florida Constitution of 1968 that would further apply to a document such as the LMS (which is adopted by resolution) being automatically applicable to all municipalities within Miami- Dade County are: Section 6. Schedule to Article VIII. – (f) DADE COUNTY; POWERS CONFERRED UPON MUNICIPALITIES. To the extent not inconsistent with the powers of existing municipalities or general law, the Metropolitan Government of Dade County may exercise all the powers conferred now or hereafter by general law upon municipalities. Specific lines in the Miami-Dade County Ordinance 8b that would further solidify something like the LMS (which is adopted by resolution) being automatically applicable to all municipalities within Miami- Dade County are: Sec. 8B-8. Duties of the Director of the Office of Emergency Management 305 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-17 1) The Director or designee shall prepare a Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan and program for the emergency management of Miami-Dade County pursuant to F.S. 252, including, but not limited to elements addressing mitigation activities, preparedness, responses to disasters and emergencies, and recovery operations and submit the Plan and program to the Director of the Division of Emergency Management. State of Florida for review and certification for consistency with the State Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan and compliance with Federal emergency management mandates. Additionally, the most recent resolution (R-452-10) adopting the LMS further reiterates the fact the municipalities are included in the line: Whereas, the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs and/or Florida Division of Emergency Management enters into agreements with Miami-Dade County to provide the funding for the County and municipalities to jointly develop a Local Mitigation Strategy to become a component of the Statewide Mitigation Strategy … Whereas, the Local Mitigation strategy meets the State agreement requirements and was accomplished with the participation of local governments, the Schools Board of Miami-Dade County. Effective comprehensive planning has also been a central focus of the Miami-Dade government from the onset. The power to "prepare and enforce comprehensive plans for the development of the county" was one of twenty-four specified in the County Home Rule Charter in 1957 and a Department of Planning is one of the four departments required by the County Home Rule Charter. The County adopted its first land use plan in 1965 and has since enacted a series of increasingly more refined growth management plans and procedures as required by the Local Government Comprehensive Planning Act of 1975 as amended from time to time. In summary, Miami-Dade has a forty-seven year history of intergovernmental coordination for effective comprehensive planning and plan implementation. This element provides a review of this coordination and identifies selected aspects in need of change. Local Governments Within Miami-Dade County Area of Concern Miami-Dade County Municipalities and Public Schools 306 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-18 Aventura Bal Harbour Bay Harbor Islands Biscayne Park Coral Gables Cutler Bay Doral El Portal Florida City Golden Beach Hialeah Hialeah Gardens Homestead Indian Creek Village Key Biscayne Medley Miami Miami Beach Miami Lakes Miami Gardens Miami Shores Miami Springs North Bay Village North Miami North Miami Beach Opa-locka Palmetto Bay Pinecrest South Miami Sunny Isles Surfside Sweetwater Virginia Gardens West Miami Miami-Dade County Public Schools Adjacent Counties Broward Collier Monroe Adjacent Municipalities Hallandale Beach Pembroke Park Miramar 307 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-19 This page left intentionally blank. 308 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-20 Appendix H: Integration Document 2 Integration of Policies and Guidance A myriad of agencies and departments are integral to future land use and development, building codes and enforcement. The LMS Working Group works to review and integrate policies and guidance to enhance our collaboration to build a more sustainable and disaster resistant community. A review of a number of these plans was done to identify elements where mitigation measures are incorporated and identify items for consideration for future incorporation of mitigation. The plans reviewed included • Southeast Florida Regional Climate Action Plan • Miami-Dade Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP) • Miami-Dade Emergency Management Recovery Plan • Miami-Dade 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan • Florida Administrative Code 73C-40.0256 2 EMAP 4.4.3 309 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-21 Southeast Florida Regional Climate Action Plan (CAP) - In January 2010, Miami-Dade, Broward, Palm Beach and Monroe counties entered into a Regional Climate Change Compact (“Compact”) - a collaborative effort to unite, organize and assess the region in relation to climate change. The Compact set out to develop regionally consistent methodologies for mapping sea-level rise, assessing vulnerability and understanding the regional greenhouse gas emissions. The CAP was developed to identify recommendations to accomplish the goals of the Compact and in October 2012 the CAP was published. The CAP organized the recommendations into seven categories: • Sustainable Communities and Transportation Planning • Water Supply, Management and Infrastructure • Natural Systems • Agriculture • Energy and Fuel • Risk Reduction and Emergency Management • Outreach and Public Policy The goals identified in the CAP are highlighted below with a brief overview of the supportive elements that dovetail into the LMS well. The Regional Climate Action Framework: Implementation Guide can be found at: http://southeastfloridaclimatecompact.org/compact-documents/ and includes potential partners and funding sources, policy/legislation needed and progress as of October 2012. In January 2013, Nichole Hefty, Chief, Office of Sustainability, Planning Division was invited to participate as an LMS Steering Committee member to help ensure the integration of the work being done by the Compact. Several LMS Working Group members and the LMS Chair are active in attending meetings and workshops held by the Compact. The following is a brief synopsis of the areas being incorporated into the LMS and Miami-Dade Emergency Management plans. 310 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-22 Sustainable Communities Goal: Reduce financial and physical losses in our building stock by reshaping where and how we build. Policy Notation SP-3 Incorporate “Adaptation Action Area” definition (as provided for in Florida law) into municipal and/or county Comprehensive Plans, to provide a means to identify those areas deemed most vulnerable to sea level rise and other climate change impacts including but not limited to extreme high tides, heavy local rain events, and storm surge for the purpose of prioritized funding and adaptation planning. OEM will incorporate language into the LMS in relation to Adaptation Action Areas and will consider this future designation in relation to the Benefit Cost Review for LMS Projects. SP-7 Develop sea level rise scenario maps to be considered for inclusion in appropriate Comprehensive Plans and/or regional planning documents as determined by the appropriate local government to guide municipal and county government climate adaptation planning efforts and continue to update regional and local planning efforts as more data becomes available and scientific projections are refined. OEM is currently working with WASD to roll out the ground and surface model with variable inputs to start to develop more refined maps on the potential impacts of sea level rise. SP-10 Work with appropriate local, regional and state authorities to revise building codes and land development regulations to discourage new development or post-disaster redevelopment in vulnerable areas to reduce future risk and economic losses associated with sea level rise and flooding. In these areas, require vulnerability reduction measures for all new construction, redevelopment and infrastructure such as additional hardening, higher floor elevations or incorporation of natural infrastructure for increased resilience. OEM is updating the Recovery Plan and the Mitigation Recovery Support Function and the Post Disaster Redevelopment plan and the Technical Advisory Committee that will be involved in post disaster recovery and redevelopment guidance/decisions. Water Supply, Management and Infrastructure Goal: Advance water management strategies and infrastructure improvements needed to mitigate for adverse impacts of climate change and sea level rise on water supplies, water and wastewater infrastructure, and water management systems. Policy Notation WS-3 Utilize existing and refined inundation maps and stormwater management models to identify areas and infrastructure at increased risk of flooding and tidal inundation with increases in sea level, to be used as a basis for identifying and prioritizing adaptation needs and strategies. OEM is currently working with WASD to roll out the ground and surface model with variable inputs to start to gather more refined maps on the potential impacts of sea level rise. 311 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-23 WS-9 Incorporate and prioritize preferred climate adaptation improvement projects in capital improvement plans and pursue funding. Stakeholders are beginning to identify projects in the LMS Project list whereby the mitigation measures may also address the potential impacts of climate change. Natural Systems Goal: Implement monitoring, management and conservation programs designed to protect natural systems and improve their capacity for climate adaptation. Policy Notation NS-7 Coordinate “living shorelines” objectives at regional scale to foster use of natural infrastructure (e.g. coral reefs, native vegetation and mangrove wetlands) instead of or in addition to grey infrastructure (e.g. bulkheads). Promotes coastal protection and aligns the CDMP CM objectives. NS-14 Maintain/restore urban tree canopy. Aligns with CDMP CON-8M Area for consideration: Education on proper placement and maintenance of trees should be provided in conjunction with this program to avoid underground and overhead infrastructure being damaged during severe weather events with trees being uprooted or toppled. Agriculture Goal: Ensure the continued viability of agriculture in Southeast Florida through polices which remove barriers to production, promote economic incentives, improve water reliability, and provide research on best management practices thereby encouraging sustainable production in the face of a changing climate. The LMS has an Agriculture/Landscape Sub-Committee that will be engaged in the updated modeling that will be run to better determine the impacts on the agricultural community. Risk Reduction and Emergency Management Goal: Provide a more resilient natural and built physical environment in light of climate change. 312 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-24 Policy Notation RR-1 Perform vulnerability analysis to identify and quantify the economic value of regional infrastructure at risk under various sea level rise scenarios and other climate change scenarios utilizing inundation mapping, modeling, and other appropriate tools. While the initial regional vulnerability assessment completed by the Compact Counties for use in this Regional Climate Action Plan has yielded important new insights on regional risk, additional and ongoing analysis is required to further refine our current understanding and to monitor changes in Southeast Florida’s risk profile over time. Area for consideration: Incorporate analysis of future hazards with new WASD ground/surface water interactive model and mapping from PWWM on design storms including current and future development. RR-2 Evaluate and improve adaptation responses for communities at risk, to include: • Development and implementation of methodologies for the assessment and evaluation of evacuation and relocation options; Area for consideration: New and updated mapping will provide OEM with local impacts so that a local response can be implemented. Currently SLOSH and the FEMA Flood Zones do NOT incorporate any future sea level rise considerations nor will the new Coastal Study that is being conducted. The new Coastal Study Maps will go into effect in 2019. Local governments need assistance from the federal government to incorporate sea level rise into hazard planning. RR-3 Incorporate climate change adaptation into the relevant Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to human life and property from disasters. Within the LMS, update local risk assessments to include climate change in the hazard analysis and vulnerability assessment section. Develop strategies for hazard mitigation and post-disaster redevelopment planning. The 2014 five year update of the LMS will include climate change considerations. OEM is currently working with WASD to roll out new modeling capabilities to help better define local potential impacts. Climate Change impacts are being integrated into the Threat and Hazard Identification Risk Analysis (THIRA) document that both the CEMP and the LMS reference for the hazard and vulnerability analysis. The Whole Community Infrastructure Planner/LMS Chair is coordinating with the Whole Community Recovery Planner for incorporation and integration of adaptation action areas and climate change impacts in the Recovery and Post-Disaster Redevelopment Plans. RR-4 Identify transportation infrastructure at risk from climate change in the region; determine whether, when, where, and to whom projected impacts from climate change might be significant. Employ inundation mapping, modeling and other appropriate tools to assess the vulnerability of transportation infrastructure to the projected impacts of climate change under various sea level rise and other climate change scenarios. OEM is currently working with WASD to roll out the ground and surface model with variable inputs to start to gather more refined maps on the potential impacts of sea level rise. Once we have these more detailed maps we can overlay the Critical Facility/Infrastructure data layers to identify structures/facilities. 313 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-25 Policy Notation RR-5 Enforce Coastal Construction Line and build upon goals, objectives and policies related to Coastal High Hazard Area designations in Comprehensive Plans. OEM will work with RER in relation to the CHHA and HVZs as the evacuation zones have shifted based on new SLOSH data and new zones set in 2013. RR-6 Adopt consistent plans at all levels of regional government that adequately address and integrate mitigation, sea level rise and climate change adaptation. The following plans must all be consistent: Disaster recovery and redevelopment plans; Comprehensive plans; Long range transportation plans; Comprehensive emergency management plans; Capital improvement plans; Economic development plans, Local Mitigation Strategy, Climate Change Action Plan; Future Land Use Plan. OEM is currently updating and working on the CEMP, LMS, Recovery Plan, Post-Disaster Redevelopment Plan and the THIRA. The Whole Community Infrastructure Planner/LMS Chair has engaged in a review of other relevant community planning documents to identify areas of integration and areas for consideration. This review will also be circulated to the LMS Working Group to encourage review and incorporation of other community planning documents including but not limited to municipalities and other regional and state planners. RR-7 Continue to implement and enforce strong building codes that require new construction and substantial improvements to existing structures to mitigate against the impacts of flooding, severe winds, and sea level rise, and which are consistent with Climate Change Adaptation policy Area for consideration: Develop mitigation measures for existing structures facing future impacts is needed to help determine feasible measures that can be implemented. RER: Does this include considering new codes for storm surge damage which may be more significant with SLR? Public Outreach Goal: Communicate the risks related to climate change and the value of adapting policies and practices to achieve resilience throughout the region. Policy Notation PO-1 Provide outreach to residents, stakeholders and elected officials on the importance of addressing climate change adaptation and preparedness and develop a program to educate specific interest groups about the Compact, Regional Climate Action Plan, and the benefits of Adaptation Action Area. Consider utilizing the Leadership Academy concept to educate elected leaders, academic interests and other decision makers. Area for consideration: Develop a PPI for Activity 330 for the CRS. Currently being looked at the CRS Sub-Committee of the LMS. PO-2 Counties, municipalities and appropriate agencies will collaborate to develop and carry out outreach/educational programs to increase public awareness about hazards exacerbated by climate change, mitigation efforts, and adaptation strategies to minimize damage and risk associated with climate change. Area for consideration: Inclusion in the PPI being developed for Activity 330 for the CRS. 314 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-26 PO-6 Develop early warning systems and social media applications to both inform residents and visitors of extreme high-tide events and to raise overall awareness on sea level rise and climate change issues. Also consider roadway signage for tidal flooding zones. Area for consideration: develop and install posts that show potential storm surge, historic flooding levels and future projected sea level rise heights in vulnerable areas. RER: Also consider developing an app or public notice that warns of expected high tides so residents can take appropriate action in advance. Public Policy Goal: Guide and influence local, regional, state and federal climate change related policies and programs through collaboration and joint advocacy. Policy Notation PP-4 Counties, municipalities, regional agencies and other appropriate government and private sector partners should integrate consideration of climate change impacts and adaptation strategies into existing and future system wide planning, operations, policies, and programs. The guiding principles developed by the Interagency Task Force on Climate Change Adaptation for federal agencies should be incorporated by entities when designing and implementing adaptation strategies:  Adopt integrated approaches.  Prioritize the most vulnerable.  Use best-available science.  Build strong partnerships.  Apply risk-management methods and tools.  Apply ecosystem-based approaches.  Maximize mutual benefits.  Continuously evaluate performance. Review of other planning documents to look for areas for consideration in integrating and improving mitigation practices. PP-11 Urge Congress to provide recognition of an “Adaptation Action Area” designation in federal law for the purpose of prioritizing funding for infrastructure needs and adaptation planning, with special attention to modifications in law that enhance funding opportunities through USACE and EPA appropriations processes, as requested by members of Congress. Area for consideration: Identify projects in the LMS Project list that are in the future designation of Adaptation Action Areas for review and prioritization of funding opportunities. 315 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-27 316 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-28 Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP) expresses Miami-Dade County’s general objectives and policies addressing where and how it intends development and the conservation of land and natural resources to occur during the next 10-20 years. This review includes updates that were added as of June 2013. RER comment: During the Evaluation and Appraisal Report adopted in 2011, climate change was identified as one of the priorities to address in the County’s Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP). Miami-Dade has incorporated climate change considerations and language in several of the Elements of the CDMP update which was approved by the Board of County Commissioners in October, 2013. These policies now form a sound foundation for Miami-Dade County to begin actively incorporating these considerations into existing capital investment and infrastructure planning processes. The following is a brief synopsis of the elements that support and promote mitigation. The complete CDMP may be found at http://www.miamidade.gov/planning/cdmp-adopted.asp 317 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-29 Land Use Element Objective LU-1 The location and configuration of Miami-Dade County's urban growth through the year 2030 shall emphasize concentration and intensification of development around centers of activity, development of well-designed communities containing a variety of uses, housing types and public services, renewal and rehabilitation of blighted areas, and contiguous urban expansion when warranted, rather than sprawl. Policy Notation LU-1H The County should identify sites having good potential to serve as greenbelts, and should recommend retention and enhancement strategies, where warranted. Such greenbelts should be suggested on the basis of their ability to provide aesthetically pleasing urban spaces, recreational opportunities, or wildlife benefits. Considered sites should include canal, road or powerline rights-of-way, or portions thereof, particularly where they could link other parklands, wildlife habitats, or other open spaces. This will provide for additional drainage areas and may help alleviate flooding issues. Area for consideration: If the sites are mapped we can overlay it with RL and SRL loss properties and areas of reported flooding so that we can see if they may help those areas. LU-1R Miami-Dade County shall take steps to reserve the amount of land necessary to maintain an economically viable agricultural industry. Miami-Dade County shall adopt and develop a transfer of developments rights (TDR) program to preserve agricultural land that will be supplemented by a purchase of development rights program to preserve agricultural land and environmentally sensitive property. The density cap of the land use category in the receiving area established by the TDR program may be exceeded. Land development regulations shall be developed to determine the extent that the density cap may be exceeded based on parcel size but in no case shall it exceed 20 percent. This will help maintain “open spaces” and any future development would be limited in density to reduce potential drainage concerns. Area for consideration: The density cap may need to be re- evaluated as we continue with the modeling process for potential sea level rise and with consideration that some of the areas may become adaptation action areas. LU-1S The Miami-Dade County Strategic Plan shall be consistent with the Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP). The Miami-Dade County Strategic Plan includes Countywide community goals, strategies and key outcomes for Miami-Dade County government. Key outcomes of the Strategic Plan that are relevant to the Land Use element of the CDMP include increased urban infill development and urban center development, protection of viable agriculture and environmentally-sensitive land, reduced flooding, improved infrastructure and redevelopment to attract businesses, availability of high quality green space throughout the County, and development of mixed-use, multi-modal, well designed, and sustainable communities. This measure promotes consistency amongst plans. One item for consideration would be to track which policies apply to all jurisdictions and ones that may be for only the UMSA. For areas where policies do not apply to municipal entities a review should be conducted to see if there is a comparable initiative at the municipal level exists. 318 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-30 319 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-31 Objective LU-3 The location, design and management practices of development and redevelopment in Miami-Dade County shall ensure the protection of natural resources and systems by recognizing, and sensitively responding to constraints posed by soil conditions, topography, water table level, vegetation type, wildlife habitat, and hurricane and other flood hazards, and by reflecting the management policies contained in resource planning and management plans prepared pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, and approved by the Governor and Cabinet, or included in the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan approved by Congress through the Water Resources Development Act of 2000. Policies Policy Notation LU-3D Miami-Dade County shall not sponsor any growth-subsidizing programs which promote future population growth and residential development on the barrier islands of Miami-Dade County or within the coastal high hazard areas (CHHA). Miami-Dade County shall coordinate with municipalities in Coastal High Hazard Areas, and areas with repetitive losses due to flooding or storm damage, to minimize demand for facilities and services that result from redevelopment and increases in residential densities. The provision of facilities and services to accomplish the timely evacuation of already-developed barrier islands in advance of approaching hurricanes shall be a priority of Miami-Dade County's transportation planning and hurricane preparedness programs. Restriction on development in Coastal High Hazard Area addresses RL, SRL and storm surge flooding and impact on evacuation clearance times. Area for consideration: Evacuation is a protective measure that is accomplished when there is time and adequate resources to support the need. There could be situations whereby there is not enough notice or people may not heed the warnings and may have to shelter in place. Is there any provision that the developers/building owners are responsible for developing a plan or designating a “safe area”? This should not be seen as an alternative to evacuation but rather a last ditch option when evacuation is not a safe possibility. See also discussion in FAC 73C-40.0256. RER comment: CDMP policies CM-8C and CM-8D pertain to this and encourage residents to be better prepared, plan ahead and enroll in the County’s public safety alert system. It does not seem likely that a safe room requirement would become a part of the Florida Building Code for residents; as there already are specific requirements for the County’s emergency public shelters and capacity requirements. LU-3E By 2017, Miami-Dade County shall initiate an analysis on climate change and its impacts on the built environment addressing development standards and regulations related to investments in infrastructure, development/redevelopment and public facilities in hazard prone areas. The analysis shall consider and build on pertinent Forward looking action item to identify potential impacts and identifying considerations. 320 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-32 information, analysis and recommendations of the Regional Climate Change Action Plan for the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact Counties, and will include the following elements: a) an evaluation of property rights issues and municipal jurisdiction associated with the avoidance of areas at risk for climate hazards including sea level rise; b) an evaluation of the current land supply-demand methodology to consider and address, as appropriate, the risk associated with infrastructure investments in flood prone areas; and c) an evaluation of the CDMP long-term time horizon in relation to addressing projected long-range climate change impacts. Recommendations from the analysis shall address appropriate changes to land use designations and zoning of impacted properties, and development standards, among other relevant considerations. OEM is currently working with WASD for the roll out of the ground and surface water interaction model that will provide for additional information/maps for how sea level rise may impact different areas of our community. Area for consideration: Identify measures for retro-fitting and future building standards in relation to the impacts of sea level rise. Consider evaluating projects in the LMS Project list for areas where sea level rise impacts cannot be mitigated to determine the benefit cost of investing limited funding sources. LU-3F By 2017, Miami-Dade County shall develop a Development Impact Tool or criteria to assess how proposed development and redevelopment project features including location, site design, land use types, density and intensity of uses, landscaping, and building design, will help mitigate climate impacts or may exacerbate climate related hazards. The tool would also assess each development’s projected level of risk of exposure to climate change impacts, such as inland flooding. Area for consideration: Climate impacts may also have increased wind speeds associated with tropical cyclones, reduced coastal barriers and higher sea levels that can push storm surge further inland. Will the Development Impact Tool include such considerations? RER: Not sure, will need to determine what it includes as it is developed. RER: This issue would first be discussed as part of the Adaptation Action Areas to determine how these additional assumptions should be incorporated into the model to identify vulnerable areas. LU-3G Miami-Dade County shall, by 2017, analyze and identify public infrastructure vulnerable to sea level rise and other climate change-related impacts. This analysis shall include public buildings, water and waste water treatment plants, transmission lines and pump stations, stormwater systems, roads, rail, bridges, transit facilities and infrastructure, airport and seaport infrastructure, libraries, fire and police stations and facilities. RER working with WASD and PWWM to create an internal workgroup to determine how to use the surface/groundwater model to help identify vulnerable areas and infrastructure. This will help develop methodology for implementing R-451-14 and Ord. 14-79 RER: BCC Resolution R-451-14 partially implements this policy. LU-3H In order to address and adapt to the impacts of climate change, Miami-Dade County shall continue to improve analysis and mapping capabilities for identifying areas of the County vulnerable to sea level rise, tidal flooding and other impacts of climate change. OEM is currently working with WASD to introduce and provide the new surface/ground water interactive model to our local stakeholders. (September 2014) LU-3I Miami-Dade County shall make the practice of adapting the built environment to the impacts of climate change an integral component of all planning processes, including but not limited to comprehensive planning, infrastructure planning, building and life Area for consideration – identify how municipal entities are addressing this as well. 321 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-33 Objective LU-6 safety codes, emergency management and development regulations, stormwater management, and water resources management. RER comment: This is under the jurisdiction of the affected municipality(ites), in which some such as Miami Beach have begun addressing this in their Stormwater Master Plan. Also See Comment in LU-3G RER: BCC Resolution R-451-14 and Ordinance 14-79 partially implement this policy. LU-3J Miami-Dade County shall continue to actively participate in the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact and collaborate to increase regional climate change resiliency by sharing technical expertise, assessing regional vulnerabilities, advancing agreed upon mitigation and adaptation strategies and developing joint state and federal legislation policies and programs. This measure promotes collaboration and integration into additional planning processes. LU-3K By 2017, Miami-Dade County shall determine the feasibility of designating areas in the unincorporated area of the County as Adaptation Action Areas as provided by Section 163.3177(6)(g)(10), Florida Statute, in order to determine those areas vulnerable to coastal storm surge and sea level rise impacts for the purpose of developing policies for adaptation and enhance the funding potential of infrastructure adaptation projects. This language is being integrated into the LMS as well. Area for consideration: AAAs should also be looked at for post- disaster redevelopment as well. RER: new surface/ground water interactive model will also be important for this. LU-3L Miami-Dade County shall work with its local municipalities to identify and designate Adaptation Action Areas as provided by Section 163.3164(1), Florida Statute, in order to develop policies for adaptation and enhance the funding potential for infrastructure projects. OEM will add this designation for projects in the LMS Project list to help identify this criteria. Area for consideration: AAA designation should also be incorporated into the Benefit Cost Review for the LMS projects. . LU-3M Miami-Dade County shall support the implementation of climate-change related policies, through education, advocacy and incentive programs. Public outreach, such as workshops or a website with relevant information, shall seek to shift residents’ everyday transportation decisions and housing choices to support transit oriented communities and travel patterns. The County shall provide opportunities for the public, including students, building industry and environmental groups, to participate in the development of any new climate-change related land development regulations and initiatives. Community outreach and education are also addressed in Policy CM-8C and Policy ICE-8E. Realtor disclosure of hazards for real estate transactions. RER comment: Chapter 11-C of the Miami-Dade County Code requires real estate disclosure if the property is located in a Special Flood Hazard or Coastal High Hazard Area (FEMA definition), see http://www.miamidade.gov/publicworks/flooding- disclosure.asp 322 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-34 Miami-Dade County shall protect, preserve, ensure the proper management, and promote public awareness of historical, architectural and archaeologically significant sites and districts in Miami-Dade County, and shall continue to seek the addition of new listings to the National Register, and increase the number of locally designated historical and archeological sites, districts and zones. Policy Notation LU-6I Miami-Dade County shall pursue efforts with other local, State and federal agencies to develop policies that recognize the importance of designated historic resources and that comply with the provisions of the County's Historic Preservation Ordinance. This objective presents an opportunity as a number of the LMS stakeholders have structures that are or are becoming historic designations. Area for consideration: Identify mitigation measures for historic structures. Develop database of local, state and national historic structures. (PROS and Office of Historic and Archaeological Resources may already have this.) Consider how impacts of sea level rise/flooding will be considered for designated historic resources. Objective LU-9 Miami-Dade County shall continue to maintain, update and enhance the Code of Miami-Dade County, administrative regulations and procedures, and special area planning program to ensure that future land use and development in Miami-Dade County is consistent with the CDMP, and to promote better planned neighborhoods and communities and well-designed buildings. Policies Policy Notation LU-9B Miami-Dade County shall continue to maintain, and enhance as necessary, regulations consistent with the CDMP which govern the use and development of land and which, as a minimum, regulate: iv) areas subject to seasonal or periodic flooding Area for consideration: Determine if this is also being done in the incorporated areas of the county. LU-9K By 2016, Miami-Dade County shall initiate the review and revision of its Subdivision Regulations to facilitate the development of better planned communities. The Public Works Department shall specifically review and update the Subdivision Regulations for urban design purposes. Changes to be considered shall include provisions for: i) Open space in the form of squares, plazas, or green areas in residential and commercial zoning categories; Provides for improved drainage. Area for consideration: Determine if this is also being done in the incorporated areas of the county. LU-9M Building, zoning and housing codes will be vigorously enforced in all areas of Miami- Dade County Promotes consistency of measures. 323 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-35 Policy Notation Area for consideration: Determine if this is also being done in the incorporated areas of the county. Objective LU-11 Miami-Dade County shall take specific measures to promote redevelopment of dilapidated or abandoned buildings and the renovation, rehabilitation or adaptive reuse of existing structures. Policy Notation LU-11B Miami-Dade County shall continue to utilize its Community Redevelopment Area (CRA) Program and federal programs such as the Community Development Block Grant and the HOME program to facilitate redevelopment of dilapidated or abandoned buildings and the renovation, rehabilitation or adaptive reuse of existing structures in eligible areas. Area for consideration: Integration of mitigation such as hardening buildings, elevation to minimize impacts of disasters. Post disaster redevelopment should be incorporated here as well. Transportation Element GOAL DEVELOP AND MAINTAIN AN INTEGRATED MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM IN MIAMI-DADE COUNTY TO MOVE PEOPLE AND GOODS IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH OVERALL COUNTYWIDE LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION GOALS AND INTEGRATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE CONSIDERATIONS IN THE FISCAL DECISION-MAKING PROCESS. Objective TE-1 Miami-Dade County will provide an integrated multimodal transportation system for the circulation of motorized and non-motorized traffic by enhancing the Comprehensive Development Master Plan and its transportation plans and implementing programs to provide competitive surface transportation mode choice, local surface mode connections at strategic locations, and modal linkages between the airport, seaport, rail and other inter-city and local and intrastate transportation facilities. These plans and programs shall seek to ensure that, among other objectives, all transportation agencies shall consider climate change adaptation into their public investment processes and decisions. Policy Notation TE-1G Miami-Dade County shall develop and adopt climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies for incorporation into all public investment processes and decisions, including those concerning transportation improvements. Promotes consistency. FHWA Pilot project being implemented by MDC, Broward and PB Counties MPO’s is exploring vulnerabilities of transportation 324 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-36 Policy Notation infrastructure to climate change and SLR impacts. This should be complete sometime in 2015. New surface/ground water interactive model will also be important for this. TE-1H Transportation agencies developing their transportation plans for Miami-Dade County shall take into consideration climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies through project review, design, and funding for all transportation projects. Transportation agencies should consider extending their planning horizons appropriately to address climate change impacts. Area for consideration: Impacts on evacuation needs to be incorporated as well. RER comment: Evacuation routes are part of the FDPT, MDX and PWWM roadway systems and RER reviews development for concurrency to ensure there is enough capacity for all services, including roadways. New LRTP incorporates climate change mitigation, adaptation and SLR considerations Traffic Circulation Subelement Miami-Dade County, since 1957, has been a home rule charter county. The Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources Planning Division therefore serves as a metropolitan agency, and the traffic circulation needs and the goal in this Subelement are presented for the entire County, including the 34 municipalities. GOAL DEVELOP, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A SAFE, EFFICIENT AND ECONOMICAL TRAFFIC CIRCULATION SYSTEM IN MIAMI-DADE COUNTY THAT PROVIDES EASE OF MOBILITY TO ALL PEOPLE AND FOR ALL GOODS, IS CONSISTENT WITH DESIRED LAND USE PATTERNS, CONSERVES ENERGY, PROTECTS THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, ENHANCES NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES, SUPPORTS THE USAGE OF TRANSIT, AND STIMULATES ECONOMIC GROWTH. Objective TC-6 Plan and develop a transportation system that preserves environmentally sensitive areas, conserves energy and natural resources, addresses climate change impacts, and promotes community aesthetic values. Policy Notation TC-6A The County shall avoid transportation improvements which encourage or subsidize increased development in coastal high hazard areas, environmentally sensitive areas II-17 identified in the Coastal Management and Conservation, Aquifer Promotes reduction of building in hazard areas. Area for consideration: How is “significant flooding” being defined? Is this being correlated to the RL, SRL and flooding 325 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-37 Recharge and Drainage Elements, and areas of high risk of significant inland flooding. complaints? New surface/ground water interactive model will also be important for this. TC-6D New roadways shall be designed to prevent and control soil erosion, minimize clearing and grubbing operations, minimize storm runoff, minimize exposure and risk of climate change impacts such as increased flood conditions, and avoid unnecessary changes in drainage patterns. Promotes flood mitigation measures. New surface/ground water interactive model will also be important for this. Objective TC-7 Miami-Dade County's Traffic Circulation Subelement, and the plans and programs of the State, region and local jurisdictions, will continue to be coordinated. Policy Notation TC-7A Miami-Dade County shall annually review subsequent Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Five-Year work programs to ensure that they remain consistent with and further the Traffic Circulation Subelement and other Elements of Miami-Dade County's CDMP. Area for consideration: Impacts on evacuation needs to be incorporated as well. RER comment: See previous comment on TE-1H. TC-7E The County shall promote coordination with all relevant transportation agencies to address climate change impacts. Promotes collaboration and integration. See Comments in TE-1G The Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), which coordinates all transportation planning for Miami-Dade County, is responsible for periodically updating the MPO's Long Range Transportation Plan. It is anticipated that the future traffic circulation network included in the Transportation Element will be adjusted during future plan amendment cycles to reflect the findings of that planning activity, in keeping with the goals, objectives and policies of the CDMP. Housing Element GOAL II THROUGHOUT MIAMI-DADE COUNTY IDENTIFY AND PROVIDE AFFORDABLE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FROM WITHIN THE EXISTING HOUSING STOCK AND ENSURE ITS EFFICIENT USE THROUGH REHABILITATION AND RENOVATION, AND FACILITATE ADAPTIVE CONVERSION OF NON-RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES TO HOUSING USE FOR EXTREMELY LOW, VERY LOW, LOW, AND MODERATE- INCOME HOUSEHOLDS, INCLUDING WORKFORCE HOUSING. 326 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-38 Objective Notation HO-7 Miami-Dade County shall support the preservation and enhancement of existing mobile home communities as an additional source of affordable housing options for extremely low through moderate income households and encourage residents and builders to incorporate energy and natural resource conservation strategies into housing design, site plan design, and improvements for existing mobile homes. Area for consideration: On site protection for residents, such as a community building/center. Assess for impacts of sea level rise and other hazards as the low to moderate income households may have less resources to buy insurance or recovery quickly after a disaster. HO-5 Reduce the number of substandard housing units in the County by encouraging the rehabilitation or conservation of the existing housing stock, including historic structures, and provide that an increased number of extremely low, very low, low and moderate-income, and workforce units comes from housing rehabilitation and adaptive re-use of non-residential structures. Area for consideration Add language for mitigation measures built into housing rehabilitation. Assess for impacts of sea level rise and other hazards as the low to moderate income households may have less resources to buy insurance or recovery quickly after a disaster. GOAL III ALL VARIATIONS OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING PRODUCTS IN MIAMI-DADE COUNTY SHOULD BE PROVIDED THROUGH THE MOST ECONOMICALLY FEASIBLE ALTERNATIVES, WHILE ENSURING THAT SITE LOCATIONS, SITE AND HOUSING DESIGNS, AND BUILDING PRACTICES FOSTER ENERGY AND LAND CONSERVATION. Objective Notation HO-8 Bring about housing design and development alternatives that are aesthetically pleasing, encourage energy efficiency and enhance the overall health, safety and general welfare of County residents. Area for consideration: Building outside of high hazard areas and with mitigation measures to lessen the impact to residents from hazards. H-11 Continue governmental assistance to persons and families displaced and relocated by public projects and encourage private-sector assistance in relocating people displaced by private projects. Area for consideration: Enter into public private partnerships to provide for safe and affordable housing. Consider involving Emergency Support Function #18 and input from the County’s Public Housing and Community Development Department. HO-11C Assure the availability of suitable emergency shelters, transitional housing, and relocation programs for very low, low- and moderate-income populations who have lost their housing, especially when displacement occurs due to redevelopment or natural disaster. Promotes temporary and transitional housing. Area for consideration: Assess housing stock and identify areas where construction under previous codes or Pre-FIRM regulations exist and identify mitigation measures that could minimize the need for relocation and reduce potential 327 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-39 damages due to hazards, including consideration for impacts of climate change and sea level rise. RER: A GIS analysis of housing stock by year might also aid in identifying older homes that may be at risk in the event of hurricanes or other natural disasters. Conservation, Aquifer Recharge and Drainage Element GOAL PROVIDE FOR THE CONSERVATION, ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND USE, AND PROTECTION OF ALL AQUATIC AND UPLAND ECOSYSTEMS AND NATURAL RESOURCES, AND PROTECT THE FUNCTIONS OF AQUIFER RECHARGE AREAS AND NATURAL DRAINAGE FEATURES IN MIAMI -DADE COUNTY. Objective CON-5 Miami-Dade County shall continue to develop and implement the Stormwater Master Plans comprised of basin plans for each of the sixteen primary hydrologic basins being addressed by the County, and cut and fill criteria as necessary to: provide adequate flood protection; correct system deficiencies in County maintained drainage facilities; coordinate the extension of facilities to meet future demands throughout the unincorporated area; and maintain and improve water quality. Each of the basins’ Master Plans is to be updated every five years, with the next update to be completed by 2017. The implementing actions recommended in each basin plan shall continue to commence immediately after the applicable plan is approved. Outside of the Urban Development Boundary the County shall not provide, or approve, additional drainage facilities that would impair flood protection to easterly developed areas of the County, exacerbate urban sprawl or reduce water storage. RER: New surface/ground water interactive model will be important for all or most of these policies. Policies Policy Notation CON- 5A The Stormwater Management (Drainage) Level of Service (LOS) Standards for Miami-Dade County contain both a Flood Protection (FPLOS) and Water Quality (WQLOS) component. The minimum acceptable Flood Protection Level of Service (FPLOS) standards for Miami-Dade County shall be protection from the degree of flooding that would result for a duration of one day from a ten-year storm, with exceptions in previously developed canal basins as provided below, where additional development to this base standard would pose a risk to existing development. All structures shall be constructed at, or above, the minimum floor elevation specified in the federal Flood Insurance Rate Maps for Miami-Dade County, or as specified in Chapter 11-C of the Miami-Dade County Code, whichever is higher. Promotes consistency between CDMP and Building Code. Area for consideration: Integration of Climate Change and Sea Level Rise. 328 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-40 Policy Notation CON- 5B Applicants seeking development orders approving any new use or site alteration outside the Urban Development Boundary where the elevation of any portion of the site will remain below County Flood Criteria shall be advised by the permitting agency that those portions of the land that are not filled to Miami-Dade County Flood Criteria may be subject to periodic flooding. Promotes education of flooding risk. Area for consideration: Integration of future risk with Climate Change and Sea Level Rise impacts. Con-5C Miami-Dade County shall work with the South Florida Water Management District to better identify the developed urban areas within the County that do not have protection from a one in ten year storm. The County shall develop stormwater management criteria and plans for all unincorporated areas identified. Where such areas fall within municipal boundaries, the County will coordinate the stormwater management planning with the appropriate municipality(ies). Promotes risk assessment across jurisdictional boundaries Area for consideration: Currently the CRS program only allows for individual jurisdictions to participate. Due to our dependent relationship with SFWMD and the risk that all of our communities face with flooding, a strategy to try to get our entire County to be seen as one community in relation to floodplain management challenges should be investigated. SFWMD to add their projects to the LMS Project list. CON- 5D Miami-Dade County shall seek funding for a comprehensive basin-by-basin drainage engineering study which will include: identification of public drainage facilities and private drainage facilities that impact the public facilities, and the entities having operational responsibility for them; establishment of geographic service areas for the drainage facilities; and, a facility capacity analysis by geographic service area for the planning periods 2015 and 2025. The LMS has started tracking mitigation projects by drainage basin so we can also map where mitigation projects are planned. The plan is to be able to show over time where drainage projects have occurred and to track the progress in the reduction of flood complaints, and RL and SRL properties. CON- 5E Miami-Dade County shall establish a priority listing of stormwater drainage including: Drainage/stormwater sewer system improvements in developed urban areas with persistent drainage problems • Canal and/or stormwater drainage improvements for developed urban areas that have less than one in ten year storm protection and where no roadway drainage improvements are planned or proposed, which would remedy problems PWWM lists drainage projects in the LMS Project list and they are required to be prioritized. Area for consideration: Identify if this also applies to municipal areas CON- 5H Miami-Dade County shall periodically evaluate stormwater drainage criteria as outlined in the County Code to ensure proper flood protection is being provided to County residents. Promotes effectiveness evaluation. Area for consideration: Identify if this also applies to municipal areas. Can this tie into 73C-40.0256. 329 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-41 Policy Notation CON-5I When building, expanding or planning for new facilities such as water treatment plants, Miami-Dade County shall consider areas that will be impacted by sea level rise. Promotes consideration of future hazard impacts. Objective CON-8 Upland forests included on Miami-Dade County's Natural Forest Inventory shall be maintained and protected. Policy Notation CON- 8M Miami-Dade County shall seek to increase the percentage of tree canopy from the present level of 10% to the national average of 30% by 2020 through the implementation and/or enforcement of: Adopt-A-Tree and other programs; landscape and tree protection ordinance changes to further increase canopy; and, other mechanisms as feasible and appropriate. Area for consideration: Education on proper placement and maintenance of trees should be provided in conjunction with this program to avoid underground and overhead infrastructure being damaged during severe weather events with trees being uprooted or toppled. RER comment: Consult with DERM as they periodically host an “Adopt a Tree” event which they may provide a pamphlet or guidance to residents in the proper care and placement of the tree. RER: This issue is also addressed in the County’s Landscape Ordinance – specifically Chapter 18B. Water and Sewer Subelement GOAL PROVIDE FOR POTABLE WATER, AND SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES WHICH MEET THE COUNTY’S NEEDS IN A MANNER THAT PROMOTES THE PUBLIC HEALTH, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY, CDMP-PLANNED LAND USE, AND ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. Objective WS-4 Miami-Dade County shall protect the health of its residents and preserve its environmental integrity by reducing the proportion of residences and commercial establishments within the County using private wastewater treatment facilities. Miami-Dade County shall discourage the new or continued use of such facilities through the strict application of the CDMP and land development regulations. 330 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-42 Policy Notation WS-4H Miami-Dade County shall coordinate with municipalities and the State of Florida to monitor existing septic tanks that are currently at risk of malfunctioning due to high groundwater levels or flooding and shall develop and implement programs to abandon these systems and/or connect users to the public sewer system. The County shall also coordinate to identify which systems will be adversely impacted by projected sea level rise and additional storm surge associated with climate change and shall plan to target those systems to protect public health, natural resources, and the region’s tourism industry. Promotes mitigation and future hazard impacts. New surface/ground water interactive model will also be important for this. Currently in the LMS Project list El Portal, Florida City, Miami Gardens, North Miami Beach, Homestead and South Miami have identified projects to support this policy. (July 2014) Recreation and Open Space Element Miami-Dade County Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces Department strives to provide equitable access to all residents of the County in order to VI-2 provide the opportunity to participate in at-will1 and/or programmed physical activities. The criteria established in the Equity Access Criteria Chart2 is developed to make Miami-Dade County a more livable and sustainable community where residents should have access to parks within their neighborhood and be able to walk or bike to a park within ½ mile from their home. In addition, residents should have access to regional parks and the recreation opportunities there-in within 2-3 miles biking or driving distance from their home. Area for consideration: Currently under the CRS program municipal entities are not getting credit for open spaces owned and operated by the County. This can impact their ability to get credit for this and negatively impact their overall CRS score which translates into higher flood insurance rates for their residents. The map and chart of sites referenced in this element of the CDMP has been included in Part 7: NFIP/CRS of the LMS. GOAL DEVELOP, PROGRAM, AND MAINTAIN A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEM OF PARKS AND RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACES OFFERING QUALITY AND DIVERSITY IN RECREATIONAL EXPERIENCES WHILE PRESERVING AND PROTECTING VALUABLE NATURAL, HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES, UNIMPAIRED, FOR PRESENT AND FUTURE GENERATIONS. Objective ROS-1 Provide a comprehensive system of public and private sites for recreation, including but limited to public spaces, natural preserve and cultural areas, greenways, trails, playgrounds, parkways, beaches and public access to beaches, open space, waterways, and other recreational facilities and programs serving the entire County; and local parks and recreation programs adequately meeting the needs of Miami-Dade County’s unincorporated population, through 2017. Policy Notation 331 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-43 ROS- 1D In cases of annexation or incorporation efforts, the County shall employ the following guidelines on a case-by-case basis: i.) The County shall not transfer either the operation and maintenance or title of any district park, metropolitan park, natural area preserve, special activity area, or greenway to a municipality; ii.) The County shall not allow proposed municipal boundaries to create multiple jurisdictions within any one area wide park; iii.) The County shall retain ownership of County-owned local parks encompassed by municipal annexation or incorporation areas if the majority of park program participants are residents of unincorporated areas; Area for consideration: Currently under the CRS program municipal entities are not getting credit for open spaces owned and operated by the County. This can impact their ability to get credit for this and negatively impact their overall CRS score which translated into higher flood insurance rates for their residents. RER comment: This issue needs to be addressed with the County’s Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces Department, as it involves County parks. Objective ROS-2 Require the availability of adequate local recreation open space as a condition for the approval of residential development orders, and maintain an adequate inventory of recreational areas and facilities through 2017. Policy Notation ROS- 2B Local recreation open space counted when measuring level of service shall include: 1) public local parks which exist or are committed by covenant; 2) public school and college playfields; 3) portions of private recreation open space; and, 4) County-owned or operated parks that have been incorporated or annexed into municipalities but in which a majority of park program participants are unincorporated area residents. Area for consideration: Currently under the CRS program municipal entities are not getting credit for open spaces owned and operated by the County. This can impact their ability to get credit for this and negatively impact their overall CRS score which translated into higher flood insurance rates for their residents. RER comment: see previous comment under ROS-1D. ROS- 2E The County shall maintain an updated inventory of County and municipal recreation open spaces serving public recreational demand. The Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces Department shall maintain information on designated public and private recreation open space and facilities necessary for accurate and regular measurements of levels of service and administration of concurrency requirements. Area for consideration: Currently under the CRS program municipal entities are not getting credit for open spaces owned and operated by the County. This can impact their ability to get credit for this and negatively impact their overall CRS score which translated into higher flood insurance rates for their residents. RER comment: see previous comment under ROS-1D. Objective ROS-3 Access to parks and recreational facilities will be improved in Miami-Dade County by 2017. 332 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-44 ROS- 3D Through its park and recreation programs and all other available means, Miami-Dade County shall preserve and protect beaches and shores, water views and maximize public ownership of these coastal resources. The County shall improve the maintenance of existing public park and recreation entrances and shall, where feasible, provide additional access points at waterfront and coastal locations. Beach re-nourishment programs, dune restoration all have benefits for mitigating sea level rise and storm surge. Objective ROS-4 The County shall maintain a capital financing plan to enable provision of park and recreation open spaces and facilities through a variety of public and private sources and partnerships. Policy Notation ROS- 4D The County shall continue to explore the use of special taxing districts and other dedicated funding mechanisms for the long-term provision and management of park and recreation open space and facilities, especially where they offer economic advantages to the County and residents. Area for consideration: Currently under the CRS program municipal entities are not getting credit for open spaces owned and operated by the County. This can impact their ability to get credit for this and negatively impact their overall CRS score which translated into higher flood insurance rates for their residents. RER comment: see previous comment under ROS-1D. ROS- 4F The County shall continue implementation of capital projects funded by 2004 Building Better Communities General Obligation Bond and 2000-2008 Quality Neighborhood Improvement Bond proceeds available for the acquisition, renovation, restoration, and development of recreation open spaces and facilities, and that these activities can be accomplished in a timely fashion. The Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces Department will continue to explore both fee-simple and less-than-fee-simple mechanisms for the establishment of open space conservation areas and will seek additional funds in any future bond issue that the County may propose. Area for consideration: Currently under the CRS program municipal entities are not getting credit for open spaces owned and operated by the County. This can impact their ability to get credit for this and negatively impact their overall CRS score which translated into higher flood insurance rates for their residents. RER comment: see previous comment under ROS-1D. ROS- 4G The Parks, Recreation and Open spaces Department will collaborate with County agencies that oversee funding programs and accounts related to horticulture, arboriculture, environmental mitigation, hazard mitigation, transportation, crime prevention, tourist development, and community and economic development, which can potentially benefit local residents through the enhancement of parks and recreation programs, should assist with the implementation of the policies in this Element by participating in inter-agency partnerships to address, for example, the following: Restoration of dunes and beaches and natural areas to protect the coastal areas from current and future risks such as sea level rise, coastal flooding and storm surge. Policy Notation 333 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-45 i.) Acquisition of parkland through leases and management agreements, forfeitures of land, and developer dedications or conveyances; ii.) Landscaping maintenance and continued resource management of parkland and natural areas such as through the use of regulatory fines collected by the Public Works and Waste Management Department or the Division of Environmental Resources Management of the Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources; iii.) Designation of park sites as off-site mitigation areas for environmental restoration; Objective ROS-5 Maintain a formal capital improvements planning program that improves and expands the park and recreation system through the acquisition of land, the renovation and restoration of facilities and natural areas, the development of new park and recreation open space and facilities, and the linking of parks and other public spaces. Policy Notation ROS- 5C The Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces Department shall, as funds are available, renovate, restore, and upgrade County facilities following the guidelines of the Miami- Dade County Park Structure and Landscape Pattern Book “Pattern Book” to enhance park aesthetics and ensure that the public can safely and securely enjoy recreational opportunities, and that the County can cost-effectively extend the useful life of existing facilities. Expenditures for the renovation, restoration and upgrade of existing parks and recreation facilities are prioritized as follows: 1) repairs and projects increasing visitor safety; 2) hazard reduction; 3) facility upgrade and resource management; 4) accessibility improvements in compliance with ADA; and, 5) energy efficiency improvements. The County shall implement projects and activities including but not limited to the following in order to address these priorities: ii.) The Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces Department will remove known hazards existing within its facilities. Provisions will be made to remove or abate asbestos within buildings, remove or mitigate materials containing lead, and provide storm protection to walls, windows, and doors. PROS actively tracks projects in the LMS Project list. Objective ROS-8 334 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-46 Objective Notation ROS-8 The Miami-Dade County Parks and Open Space System Master Plan (OSMP), through a 50-year planning horizon, shall guide the creation of an interconnected framework of parks, public spaces, natural and cultural areas, greenways, trails, and streets that promote sustainable communities, the health and wellness of County residents, and that serve the diverse local, national, and international communities. Area for consideration: Integration of consideration for impacts of future hazards, including climate change. 335 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-47 Coastal Management Element The Coastal Management Element reflects the uniqueness of the coastal area of Miami-Dade County and the realities of planning for a highly developed barrier island chain and low-lying mainland, a complex metropolitan area of over 2.5 million residents and 12 million annual tourists that heavily use the urban park system, especially coastal parks and waterways. The County continues its stewardship of these coastal resources, with activities including water quality monitoring, coastal wetland restoration, and increasing public awareness of and access to these coastal areas. Furthermore, Miami-Dade County is the only County in the nation to possess within its boundaries two national parks, Biscayne National Park and Everglades National Park, as well as the heavily used Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserve, which is urban Miami-Dade's signature amenity. Miami-Dade County continues its tradition of strong pre- and post-hurricane planning, utilizing lessons learned from Hurricane Andrew and other natural disasters. The County’s evacuation zones, labeled A, B, and C, are not storm category dependent. Each storm’s dynamics are modeled to predict potential impacts based on the Sea, Lake and Overland Surge from Hurricanes (SLOSH) II computer model, developed by the National Hurricane Center, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Geological Survey and the Federal Emergency Management Agency, in cooperation with state and local offices of emergency management. Orders for evacuations are based on the storm’s track, projected storm surge potential impacts and consultation with knowledgeable agencies. These three evacuation zones - Zone A, Zone B, and Zone C - as delineated by the Miami-Dade County Office of Emergency Management (OEM) are presented for information purposes on Figure 1. In accordance with Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, coastal high hazard areas (CHHA) are areas that are seaward of the elevation of a category one storm surge line and is depicted in Figure 13 in the Land Use Element. Area for consideration: • In 2013 with the new SLOSH data OEM updated the previous evacuation zones with Storm Surge Planning Zones. A closer look at utilizing the Category one storm surge information needs to be done. OEM uses 18” as the delineation for evacuation but lesser amounts of storm surge may impact areas that are not reflected in the storm surge planning zones. When the new SLOSH data was analyzed and the new planning zones were set by OEM there was a shift geographically where the A zone was designated. This may have a direct impact on the CHHA. See the section on the review of Florida Administrative Code 73C-40.0256 • FEMA is currently conducting the Southeast Florida Coastal Study that includes Miami-Dade, Broward, Palm Beach and Monroe Counties. Data is being collected and PWWM and OEM worked collectively to get all municipalities to participate in the Discovery Meeting held on June 24, 2014. The proposed maps would go into effect in 2019 after the data collection, analysis, review and community input process. RER comment: An update of the Storm Surge Planning Zones map and text reference is warranted, but needs to be with a comprehensive discussion and evaluation with OEM, Office of Sustainability, PWWM and other County agencies regarding the change in terminology from “evacuation zones” to “storm surge zones”, and also address OEM’s concerns with the SLOSH model. This update may be done in coordination with the Adaptation Action Areas and the Development Impact Tool referenced in the LU Element, or can be updated separately if needed. 336 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-48 337 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-49 GOAL PROVIDE FOR THE CONSERVATION, ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND USE AND PROTECTION OF ALL NATURAL AND HISTORIC RESOURCES; LIMIT PUBLIC EXPENDITURES IN AREAS SUBJECT TO DESTRUCTION BY NATURAL DISASTERS; AND PROTECT HUMAN LIFE AND PROPERTY IN THE COASTAL AREA OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. Objective CM-1 Protect, conserve and enhance coastal wetlands and living marine resources in Miami- Dade County. Policy Notation CM-1A Mangrove wetlands in the following locations and mangrove wetlands within the “Environmental Protection” designation on the Adopted Land Use Plan (LUP) Map for Miami-Dade County shall be designated as "Mangrove Protection Areas" • Publically owned mangrove wetlands within and adjacent to the Oleta River State Recreation Area • Haulover Park • Bird Key (privately owned) • Near-shore islands and northwestern shoreline of Virginia Key • The western shore of Key Biscayne • Bear Cut Preserve • The Cocoplum Mangrove Preserve • Matheson Hammock Park • R. Hardy Matheson Preserve • Chapman Field Park • The Deering Estate and Chicken Key • Royal Harbor Yacht Club and Paradise Point south shoreline (privately owned) Natural systems (including mangrove wetlands) provides natural storm surge attenuation. 338 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-50 • Mangrove and scrub mangroves within and adjacent to Biscayne National Park and Everglades National Park to the landward extent of the mangroves • Mangrove and scrub mangroves within and adjacent to Card Sound, Manatee Bay, Florida Bay and Barnes Sound to the landward extent of the mangroves In these areas no cutting, trimming, pruning or other alteration including dredging or filling of mangroves shall be permitted except for purposes of surveying or for projects that are: (1) necessary to prevent or eliminate a threat to public health, safety or welfare; (2) water dependent; (3) required for natural system restoration and enhancement; or (4) clearly in the public interest; and where no reasonable upland alternative exists. In such cases, the trimming or alteration shall be kept to the minimum, and done in a manner, which preserves the functions of the mangrove system, and does not reduce or adversely affect habitat used by endangered or threatened species. Objective CM-2 Protect, conserve or enhance beaches and dunes and offshore reef communities. Policy Notation CM-2B Beaches shall be stabilized by planting, maintaining and monitoring appropriate dune vegetation, and by providing elevated footpaths or other means of traversing the dune without contributing to erosion. All subsequent activities or development actions on, or bordering the restored beach, shall be compatible with and contribute to beach maintenance. Promotes coastal protection. Objective CM-4 Miami-Dade County shall continue to work in cooperation with other appropriate agencies to increase the acreage, restoration and enhancement of publically owned benthic, coastal wetland and coastal hammock habitat. Endangered and threatened animal species and coastal wildlife shall be protected and coastal habitats restored and managed to improve wildlife values. 339 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-51 An added benefit of restoration and enhancement of these areas is that it serves as a natural buffer for storm surge and sea level rise. Studies to determine the projected impacted of sea level rise and climate change on these natural areas would be beneficial to determine if additional measures can be taken. Objective CM-5 Miami-Dade County shall increase the amount of shoreline devoted to water-dependent, water-related, and publicly accessible uses. Policy Notation CM-5C Miami-Dade County shall continue to place a high priority on the acquisition of coastal lands for use as parks and preserves. Promotes coastal protection. CM-5F The siting of public or private water dependent facilities shall be based on upland, shoreline and in-water characteristics, as well as submerged land ownership. At a minimum, the following general criteria shall be used to determine the appropriateness of sites within the Coastal Area for marina/water-dependent projects: (d) Provide a hurricane contingency plan. Area for consideration: Where are the hurricane contingency plans submitted and who reviews them? Is this a one- time hurricane plan or a requirement that plans are updated? RER comment: Certain marine facilities are required to obtain a yearly Marine Operation Permit (MOP) from DERM. The thought was coordinate this with the MOP to have the facilities provide us guidance on their plans in the event of a hurricane. A sample form is shown in UF- IFAS/Seagrant’s publication “Hurricane Manual for Marine Interests” (available on pg. 14 at http://miami- dade.ifas.ufl.edu/pdfs/disaster/HurricaneManual1.pdf ) to foster awareness of the importance of preparing for hurricanes. In addition, these marine facilities could also be mapped, which would aid in post-hurricane recovery in locating boating and marine damage.. Objective CM-6 Miami-Dade County shall preserve traditional shoreline uses and minimize user conflicts and impacts of man-made structures and activities on coastal resources. Policy Notation CM-6A By 2017, Miami-Dade County shall seek funding to study protection of traditional public uses of the shoreline and water, user conflicts, and impacts of construction and activities on coastal resources, including potential solutions. Promotes mitigation and future hazard impacts. 340 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-52 Objective CM-7 Improve the public's awareness and appreciation of Miami-Dade County's coastal resources and water-dependent and water-related uses. Policy Notation CM-7D Miami-Dade County shall continue its public involvement in natural areas restoration including removing invasive exotic plant species, reseeding or replanting native vegetation, enhancing habitat, monitoring wildlife, and renourishing dunes in coastal County parks. Promotes mitigation. Objective CM-8 The existing time period required to complete the evacuation of people from flood vulnerable Coastal Areas and mobile homes prior to the arrival of sustained tropical storm force winds shall be maintained or lowered. Shelter capacity within Miami-Dade County shall be increased as necessary to provide a safe haven for storm evacuees. Policy Notation CM-8A Miami-Dade County shall annually review and update, if necessary, the hurricane evacuation procedure section of its Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) and maintain or enhance, as necessary, the resources and capabilities of the Miami-Dade Office of Emergency Management to provide effective implementation of the CEMP. Area for consideration: when new construction of multi- family dwellings or business parks occurs, notify emergency management so outreach on hazards and protective measures can occur. RER comment: OEM is notified of all public hearings for CDMP amendments, which can change the land use and possibly also the usage and expected population. For permits for construction and certificates of occupancy, coordination with the County’s Building department is needed. However, this only covers the County’s jurisdiction over property located in unincorporated Miami- Dade County, as municipalities have their own jurisdiction over land use and zoning, should also coordinate with the municipalities’ building departments. Monitor the evolution of population density to better plan for supportive resources. 341 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-53 Policy Notation CM-8B Miami-Dade County shall request that State government better assist Miami- Dade County with funding emergency planning and operations, including future State funding for the preparation of hazard mitigation and post-disaster redevelopment plans. To reflect the larger scale and complexity of planning, preparation, response, and recovery within large counties, Miami-Dade County shall request the State to revise its current funding distribution formula for natural disaster planning and emergency operations from the present equal distribution of monies between the 67 Florida Counties to a proportionate distribution formula reflecting population. CM-8C Miami-Dade County shall develop a public education program prior to the hurricane season to notify households and operators of hotels, motels or time- share condominiums in flood vulnerable Coastal Areas of their need to evacuate and seek safe shelter in the event of a hurricane. The public education program should also be utilized to disseminate emergency preparedness information. Emergency information shall be printed in the community interest section of the telephone book. Area for consideration: Consistency in language utilized for other planning purposes such as the Coastal High Hazard and Hurricane Vulnerable Zones. Engage CRS community planners to assist with outreach for flood issues and education on insurance and mitigation measures. Update the reference to the telephone book or include other more modern forms of media. RER Comment: The last update of the comprehensive plan kept the language intact as to keep in mind vulnerable populations who may not have immediate internet access. The next comprehensive plan update can add in terms pertaining to the internet or to social media. CM-8D Miami-Dade County shall encourage its residents to be better prepared and more self-reliant in the event of a hurricane, including planning ahead for early evacuation, sheltering with family or friends living outside evacuation areas, or enrolling in County programs such as the Emergency and Evacuation Assistance Program, residential shuttering program, or public safety alert programs. CM-8E Miami-Dade County shall establish and maintain mutual aid agreements and contracts that would facilitate and expedite post-disaster emergency response and recovery. CM-8F If any update of the hurricane evacuation study shows an increase or projected expansion in the time required to safely clear the roadways in and from areas subject to coastal flooding, measures shall be undertaken to maintain the existing Area for consideration: Ensure the new updates made in 2013 have been incorporated into the CDMP. 342 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-54 Policy Notation evacuation period. These measures may include programming transportation improvements to increase the capacity of evacuation routes, eliminate congestion at critical links and intersections, adjust traffic signalization or use directional signage, public information programs, or amendments to the Comprehensive Development Master Plan to reduce permitted densities in the areas subject to coastal flooding. CM-8G The existing network of designated major evacuation routes shall be kept up-to- date utilizing the regional hurricane evacuation study or the best information available to Miami-Dade County. Area for consideration: Evaluation of these routes in relation to current and future hazards and identification of potential mitigation measures. CM-8H The Transportation Improvement Program shall include improvements to roadways that would eliminate severe congestion on major evacuation routes and critical links and intersections. All future improvements to evacuation routes shall include remedies for flooding. All local bridges shall be rated by the Florida Department of Transportation for structural and operational sufficiency. All State and local bridges with unsatisfactory sufficiency ratings shall be programmed for improvements, or where necessary, replacement. Area for consideration: also link this to TE-1H the consideration of climate change adaptation OEM developed a bridge board in WebEOC to track the status of bridges in the county, primarily the drawbridges and bridges that are evacuation routes. This should be updated to reflect any concerns with the safety or weight restrictions for bridges and bridges under construction should be notated in this system to ensure that during activations agencies in the EOC are aware of any evacuation concerns/challenges. CM-8I The Miami-Dade County Transit Agency shall allocate sufficient buses to safely evacuate areas with large concentrations of households without autos such as south Miami Beach. The Office of Emergency Management and Miami-Dade County Transit shall study options for securing drivers. CM-8J The Office of Emergency Management (OEM) shall maintain and annually update a listing of people with special needs to plan for the mobilization required to safely evacuate and shelter those who may need assistance due to physical or medical limitations. All public shelters should be in compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990. Special shelters within south, central, and north Miami- Dade County should be medically staffed and equipped for those persons in need. CM-8K Miami-Dade County shall annually evaluate the need for expansion of its shelter capacity and provide for the projected number of hurricane evacuees as determined by the best information available. Existing and proposed future public facilities, such as schools, shall be inventoried to identify and designate additional structures suitable for shelters. Public facilities that are used permanently for public shelters shall be listed, mapped, and publicized. Sites that are identified in need of mitigation measures should be put into the LMS Project List. Currently there are a number of projects listed for Arnold Hall. 343 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-55 Policy Notation CM-8L Miami-Dade County shall examine incentives for using privately owned buildings for public shelters and incorporate into its emergency plans a strategy for providing post-disaster shelter and temporary housing to large numbers of disaster victims. Miami-Dade County shall examine the feasibility of requiring, or adding as an option for new residential construction, a structurally reinforced "safe room" for use as a private storm shelter. For existing residences, Miami-Dade County shall encourage retrofitting a safe room on a voluntary basis. Miami-Dade County shall also explore incentives and other measures to encourage the wind and/or flood hardening of structures. Area for consideration: provide guidance on how a safe room could be retrofitted. FEMA has some publications that can be used to promote this. RER comment: Should coordinate this with the County’s Building Department. CM-8N No new mobile home parks shall be allowed in areas subject to coastal flooding and any new mobile home parks outside the areas subject to coastal flooding shall include one or more permanent structures in accordance with current and applicable building and construction codes for use as shelter during a hurricane. All mobile home park residents, regardless of their location, shall be advised to evacuate in the event of a hurricane. CM-8O Trees susceptible to damage by sustained tropical storm force winds (39 knots) shall be removed from the rights-of-way of evacuation routes and replaced with suitable, preferably native, species. To strengthen trees planted along roadways and reduce future breakage and blowdowns, the County shall implement an ongoing tree maintenance program of regular trimming and fertilizing and encourage other governments responsible for landscaped roadways to adopt similar tree maintenance programs Area for consideration: Ensure other county programs that encourage tree planting include information regarding best locations to plant trees to minimize damages to underground and overhead infrastructure. RER comment: See previous comment under CON-8L. Objective CM-9 Miami-Dade County shall continue to orient its planning, regulatory, and service programs to direct future population concentrations away from the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) and FEMA “V” Zone. Infrastructure shall be available to serve the existing development and redevelopment proposed in the Land Use Element and population in the CHHA, but shall not be built, expanded, or oversized to promote increased population in the coastal high-risk area. Policy Notation CM-9A Development and redevelopment activities in the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA), Hurricane Evacuation Zone A, and the Hurricane Vulnerability Zone1 Hurricane Zone B shall be limited to those land uses that have acceptable risks to Area for consideration: This needs to be evaluated as per the comments in the FAC 9J-2.0256 the criteria that OEM uses to designate evacuation zones is based on a higher 344 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-56 Policy Notation life and property. The basis for determining permitted activities shall include federal, State, and local laws, the pre-disaster study and analysis of the acceptability of various land uses reported in the County's Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan required by Policy CM-10A, when approved, and the following guidelines: i) Discourage development on the CHHA, including the barrier islands and shoreline areas susceptible to destructive storm surge; ii) Direct new development and redevelopment to high ground along the Atlantic Coastal Ridge and inland environmentally suitable lands; iii) Maintain, or reduce where possible, densities and intensities of new urban development and redevelopment within Hurricane Evacuation Zone A to that of surrounding existing development and zoning; iv) Prohibit construction of new mobile home parks and critical facilities in Hurricane Evacuation Zone A; v) Prohibit Land Use Plan map amendments or rezoning actions that would increase allowable residential density in the FEMA "V" Zone, the CHHA or on 1 According to 92.0256, F.A.C., Hurricane Vulnerability Zones are defined as areas delineated in the regional or local evacuation plan as requiring evacuation in the event of a 100-year or category three hurricane event. In Miami-Dade County, the Hurricane Vulnerability Zones are considered Hurricane Evacuation Zones A and B.land seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) established pursuant to Chapter 161, F.S.; and, vi) Continue to closely monitor new development and redevelopment in areas subject to coastal flooding to implement requirements of the federal flood insurance program. threshold of water than the data compiled in the evacuation studies. In 2013 a major change in the extent of areas where storm surge was modeled covered a more extensive portion of the county and the areas at risk from surge for a category one shifted to the southern portions of the county. Incorporate Adaptation Action Areas into areas for restricted or no development and considerations for post disaster redevelopment. Update this section to include Zones A, B and C as the storm surge zones have increased to five from three. RER comment: See previous comment at the introduction of this Element. This requires further discussion as to the exact terminology, as this and several other policies reference “evacuation zones” while OEM now has five “storm surge zones”. Utilize modeling done by PWWM for design storms with future development to identify future concerns, integrating new modeling to be done for sea level rise. CM-9B Land use amendments to the Comprehensive Development Master Plan shall not be approved in Coastal High Hazard Areas if they would decrease Levels of Service on roadways below the LOS standards established in the Transportation Element. CM-9C Miami-Dade County shall consider undeveloped land in areas most vulnerable to destructive storm surges for public or private recreational uses and open space, including restoration of coastal natural areas. Promotes mitigation. 345 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-57 Policy Notation Area for consideration: incorporate also areas identified as Adaptation Action Areas and those identified as at potential risk for climate change impacts CM-9D New facilities which must function during a hurricane, such as hospitals, nursing homes, blood banks, police and fire stations, electrical power generating plants, communication facilities and emergency command centers shall not be permitted in the Coastal High Hazard Area and when practical, shall not be located in the Hurricane Vulnerability Zone. Promotes mitigation of future risk. Area for consideration: Also consider analysis as discussed in LU-3G and adaptation of the built environment in LU-3I for these facility types. CM-9E The construction or operation of new non-water dependent industrial or business facilities that would generate, use or handle more than 50 gallons of hazardous wastes or materials per year shall be prohibited in the Coastal High Hazard Area. Miami-Dade County shall seek funding to wind- and flood-harden existing public facilities of this type. Promotes mitigation CM-9F Public expenditures that subsidize new or expanded infrastructure that would encourage additional population growth in the Coastal High Hazard Areas shall be prohibited. New public facilities shall not be built in the Coastal High Hazard Area, unless they are necessary to protect the health and safety of the existing population or for the following exceptions: public parks, beach or shoreline access; resource protection or restoration; marinas or Ports; or roadways, causeways and bridges necessary to maintain or improve hurricane evacuation times. Potable water and sanitary sewer facilities shall not be oversized to subsidize additional development in the Coastal High Hazard Area. Area for consideration: Links to LU-3! And practice of adapting the built environment with consideration of climate change CM-9G Miami-Dade County shall utilize its Geographic Information System and other forms of mapping of public buildings and infrastructure within the Coastal High Hazard Area and Hurricane Vulnerability Zone to facilitate and expedite pre- and post-disaster decision-making. CM-9H Rise in sea level projected by the federal government, and refined by the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact, shall be taken into consideration in all future decisions regarding the design, location, and development of infrastructure and public facilities in the County. OEM is currently working with WASD for the roll out of the ground and surface water interaction model that will provide for additional information/maps for how sea level rise may impact different areas of our community. OEM is incorporating climate change and sea level rise into the Threat Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA). The LMS has added climate change and sea level rise in the Benefit Cost Review of projects. 346 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-58 Policy Notation Unified SLR Projection of Compact being revisited and should be confirmed as is or refined by end of 2014/beginning of 2015. Objective CM-10 Reduce the exposure of life and property in Miami-Dade County to hurricanes through the planning and implementation of pre-disaster hazard mitigation measures. Pre-disaster planning for post-disaster redevelopment shall direct population concentrations away from the undeveloped designated Coastal High Hazard Areas and away from identified high-risk areas during post-disaster redevelopment. Policy Notation CM- 10A Miami-Dade County shall update its Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan every two years to provide comprehensive pre-disaster planning for pre- and post-disaster activities, development, and redevelopment. CM- 10B During pre-disaster planning, hazard mitigation proposals shall be developed by Miami-Dade County in conjunction with other agencies and, where appropriate, included in the Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan or the Comprehensive Development Master Plan. The LMS Project List is actively updated and tracked. A review of the CDMP and other community planning documents is being conducted to better integrate our efforts and work collaboratively. CM- 10C Prior to post-disaster redevelopment, sources of funds to reconstruct, relocate, or construct new public buildings and infrastructure, consistent with Policy CM- 9F, shall be identified to support and expedite the demands generated by post- disaster reconstruction. Area for consideration: incorporation and consideration for post disaster redevelopment in areas designated as Adaptation Action Areas. CM- 10D Applications for comprehensive plan amendments, rezoning, zoning variances or subdivision approvals for all new development in areas subject to coastal flooding shall be reviewed for emergency evacuation, sheltering, hazard mitigation, and post-disaster recovery and redevelopment. CM- 10E During pre-disaster planning, Miami-Dade County shall determine the feasibility of relocating public buildings and infrastructure away from the Coastal High Hazard Area and Hurricane Vulnerability Zone, particularly the FEMA "V" Zone, except as provided in Policy CM-9F. The County shall develop a formal process and guidelines for evaluating alternatives to the replacement or repair of public facilities damaged by hurricanes such as abandonment, relocation, or repair and reconstruction with structural modifications. The costs; environmental impacts; mitigative effects; community impacts; economic development issues; Promotes mitigation 347 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-59 Policy Notation employment effects; legal issues; consistency with state, regional and local plans; time period for implementation; and availability of funds should be evaluated for each alternative. CM-10- F The Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) and Hurricane Vulnerability Zone (HVZ) boundaries shall be delineated on maps for the unincorporated areas as public information maintained by Miami-Dade County. The CHHA shall be identified using the Sea, Lake, Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH) model and shall be depicted as one of the maps in the Future Land Use Map series. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and other forms of mapping will be used for the purpose of public information and government planning, administration, emergency management, zoning, and location of public facilities and services in the unincorporated areas of Miami-Dade County. This mapping shall be maintained by the Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources, the Office of Emergency Management, and other appropriate departments and updated as needed. The SLOSH model shall be used to identify the Coastal High Hazard Areas. The Office of Emergency Management shall manage and update the SLOSH model and hurricane evacuation studies for Miami-Dade County and shall work with the South Florida Regional Planning Council to ensure that such maps and studies are done in a consistent manner, and that the methodology used for modeling storm surge is that used by the National Hurricane Center. Area for consideration: As per other notations regarding the evacuation study and designation of evacuation zones by OEM this needs to be looked at. CM- 10G In advance of major storms, Miami-Dade County shall identify and map areas in coordination with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection suitable and unsuitable for post-disaster relief staging areas, debris storage, and disposal or burning. Debris shall not be located in wellfield protection areas, wetlands, parklands with adjacent natural areas, Natural Forest Communities, historic sites, and designated or known archaeological sites as determined by the County archaeologist, or other areas identified as unsuitable for such activities. Debris shall not be burned in the air sheds of Biscayne National Park and Everglades National Park. Pre-planning in areas of lower risk and suitable for disaster response and recovery operations. CM- 10H Miami-Dade County shall request the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to develop interactive computer modeling capabilities between the Sea and Lake Overland Surge from Hurricanes (SLOSH) and inland flood models. Area for consideration: As the SFWMD plays such major role in local drainage control it is paramount that they assist with the provision of maintenance plans for credit in the CRS. 348 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-60 Policy Notation CM-10I Miami-Dade County shall seek funds to conduct a comprehensive marine hurricane contingency study to: i.) Describe what owners in all the major public and private marinas in Miami-Dade County expect to do with their boats in the event of a hurricane; ii.) Identify areas of potential conflicts and needs; iii.) Recommend appropriate solutions, such as emergency mooring systems; iv.) Seek coordinated and multi-jurisdictional adoption and enforcement of the recommended solutions, and if applicable; v.) Seek funding to implement capital improvement projects. This is mainly to support any studies or grants sought by PROS, DERM, UF-IFAS or SeaGrant in support of these activities. CM-10J All facilities subject to DERM’s annual marine facilities operating permit shall provide as a part of their renewal a hurricane contingency plan. Area for consideration: Whom does this get submitted to and who reviews it? RER comment: See RER remarks under CM-5F. Objective CM-11 During post-disaster recovery and redevelopment, Miami-Dade County shall implement its Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) and applicable CDMP policies and assist hurricane damaged areas with recovery and hazard mitigation measures that reduce the potential for future loss of life and property. Policy Notation CM- 11A To facilitate post-disaster recovery and redevelopment following a major hurricane and consistent with available personnel and funding, Miami-Dade County shall implement the County's Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan as updated pursuant to Policy CM-10A. A new damage assessment system to identify the effects of a disaster on the local community to include the physical, economic, human needs, the environmental impacts is being implemented in 2014. CM- 11B During post-disaster recovery periods, the Miami-Dade County Public Works and Waste Management Department, the Office of Emergency Management, the Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources and other appropriate agencies shall identify damaged areas requiring rehabilitation or redevelopment; implement the redevelopment plan along with public input to reduce or eliminate future exposure of life and property to future disasters; analyze and recommend to the County Commission hazard mitigation options for damaged areas and public facilities; and recommend amendments, if needed, to the Miami-Dade County Comprehensive Development Master Plan. Areas to be identified using the new Impact Assessment system. In the event the Recovery Plan is activated RSF Land Use will work with and through the appropriate partners to implement the redevelopment plan to reduce or eliminate future exposure of life and property to future disasters; analyze and recommend to the County Commission hazard mitigation options for damaged areas and public facilities; and recommend amendments, if needed, to the 349 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-61 Policy Notation Miami-Dade County Comprehensive Development Master Plan. CM- 11C If rebuilt, structures with damage exceeding 50 percent of pre-storm market value shall be reconstructed to ensure compliance with the High Velocity Hurricane Zone portion of the Florida Building Code and the requirements of Chapter 11-C of the Miami-Dade County Code for structures located in the "V" Zone and the 100-year floodplain. Miami-Dade County shall implement uniform spatial and engineering standards for determining if substantial reconstruction is required. Promotes mitigation CM- 11D If an area in need of major post-disaster redevelopment is determined to be a high-risk area for development, permitted post-disaster densities and intensities shall not exceed the permitted pre-storm densities and intensities. Area for consideration: incorporation of Adaptation Action Areas to limit or restrict reconstruction in those areas. Tie into LU-3E. CM- 11E Miami-Dade County shall give priority to the public acquisition of properties in the HVZ and, in particular, in the CHHA that have been destroyed as a result of a hurricane. Miami-Dade County shall identify and encourage potential federal and state acquisition programs to assist with the purchase of these properties and for possible relocation of facilities on these properties to outside of the CHHA. Area for consideration: incorporation of Adaptation Action Areas CM- 11F During post-disaster redevelopment, structures which suffer repeated damage to pilings, foundations, or load bearing walls shall be required to rebuild landward of their present location and/or be structurally modified to meet current building codes. Area for consideration: Consider future risk. Tie into LU- 3E CM- 11G During post-disaster redevelopment the capacities of evacuation routes shall be improved through redesign and reconstruction of the street network, signage, and expansion of public transportation systems and services. Area for consideration: Consider future risk and climate change impacts. Objective CM-12 Protect, preserve, and sensitively reuse historic resources and increase the number of locally designated historic sites and districts and archaeological sites and zones in the coastal area. Policies Policy Notation 350 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-62 CM- 12A In addition to the policies contained in the Land Use Element, the County shall establish performance standards for the development and sensitive reuse of historic resources in the Coastal Area. Helps preserve tourism and economic value of historic resources. CM- 12B The County shall work with the appropriate municipalities to ensure that historic structures included within designated historic districts are not destroyed unless they are damaged by a hurricane or otherwise rendered beyond reasonable use and repair. Area for consideration: work with LMS group to identify mitigation measures and guides for historic structures CM- 12C The County shall improve the protection of historic resources from the damage caused by natural disasters and recovery operations by implementing pre- and post-storm hazard mitigation measures and code enforcement. A number of stakeholders have mitigation projects identified for historic structures. Intergovernmental Coordination Element GOAL USE INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION AS A MAJOR MEANS OF ENSURING CONSISTENCY AMONG LOCAL, COUNTY, REGIONAL AND STATE GOVERNMENT PLANS AND POLICIES AND OF IMPLEMENTING MIAMI-DADE COUNTY'S COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN. Objective ICE-1 Maintain and improve coordination of planning, development and impact assessment among governmental entities with applicable responsibilities within Miami-Dade County's area of concern1 Policy Notation ICE-1D In subsequent comprehensive plans, amendments and/or updates, seek to consider local, County agencies and regional comprehensive plans as necessary to better reflect Regional/County/City division of local and area wide comprehensive planning, development regulation and services provision, for consistency with the County’s CDMP. Review of various plans for LMS five year update( July 2014) ICE-1T During pre-development program planning and site selection activities, Miami- Dade County Internal Services Department and other facility and service providers shall coordinate with the Miami-Dade County Public School System to consider all reasonable opportunities to collocate new libraries, parks, and other public facilities with public schools, where compatible and the potential exists to create logical focal points for community activity. Early review and coordination activities will be modified as necessary to timely consider these potentials. Area for consideration: Identification of potential shelter locations, if not for hurricanes, for other local disasters that may require temporary sheltering. 351 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-63 Objective ICE-3 Encourage the use of interlocal agreements and municipal boundary changes to improve coordination of local development and the effective and efficient delivery of local services. Policy Notation ICE-3G Maintain and utilize the authority provided in the Miami-Dade County Home Rule Charter for the County to maintain, site, construct and/or operate public facilities in incorporated and unincorporated areas of the County. Furthermore, in order to protect and promote the health, safety, order, convenience, and welfare of the residents, the County shall retain regulatory control over land use, development and service delivery for all facilities of countywide significance as listed in Table 3. While the County reserves all rights provided by the Miami-Dade County Home Rule Charter, when siting facilities of countywide significance within the boundaries of an incorporated municipality, the County will consider the municipal comprehensive plan and development regulations, as well as the need for the public facility and suitable alternative locations. The County shall at a minimum retain the authority to enforce covenants accepted in connection with Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP) or Zoning approvals to provide facilities of countywide significance in areas subsequently incorporated, or annexed into existing municipalities. Area for consideration: Currently the CRS program only allows for individual jurisdictions to participate. Due to our dependent relationship with SFWMD and the risk that all of our communities face with flooding, a strategy to try to get our entire County to be seen as one community in relation to floodplain management challenges should be investigated. Parks notate in Table 3 (abridged ) below are not currently counted towards open spaces for CRS communities as they are county parks. Table 3 Facilities of Countywide Significance Department/Facility Address Municipality If Applicable Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces Department (PROS) Metropolitan Parks – As located by PROS Various Natural Area Preserves – As located by Various Greenways – As located by PROS Various Special Activity Areas – As located by PROS Various District Parks – As located by PROS Various 352 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-64 Vizcaya Museum and Gardens 3251 South Miami Ave Miami Deering Estate Miami-Dade Zoological Park and Gardens (aka Zoo M iami) Zoo M iami Entertainment Area I Zoo M iami Entertainment Area II 16701 SW 72 Avenue 12400 SW 152 Street 12400 SW 152 Street 12300 SW 152 Street Palmetto Bay Miam i-Dade Miami-Dade Miami-Dade Policy Notation ICE-5F The County shall continue participation in the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact and shall coordinate with other agencies, local municipalities, and the private sector to develop initiatives and goals to address climate change mitigation and adaptation. Climate change related goals that support regional climate change objectives shall be integrated into the CDMP as appropriate. Promotes integration and collaboration. ICE-5G All County departmental master plans and strategic business plans shall include and prioritize climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies. Climate change related amendments shall be recommended through the next feasible, regularly scheduled amendment process or departmental master plan update for each respective planning document. a) Each County department shall consider extending planning horizons (i.e. 30, 50, 75-year plans) as appropriate to adequately address the projected long-term climate change impacts into resource allocation recommendations. b) All new departmental climate change policies and programs shall be monitored for effectiveness. OEM adding climate change to the THIRA, which is the threat and risk assessment that is referenced by the CEMP and the LMS. 353 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-65 Objective ICE-8 Ensure adequate and timely shelter within the region for those residing in hurricane evacuation areas by encouraging all levels of government to work together. Policies Policy Notation ICE- 8A Encourage local governments and federal, State and regional agencies to protect the population by developing a system of emergency communication on roadways including electronically-controlled message signs and a radio station to broadcast highway conditions. Supports evacuation and emergency messaging. ICE- 8B Promote the establishment and maintenance of mutual aid agreements among local governments to protect the population. Promotes integration and coordinated response, maximizing resources and minimizes duplication. ICE- 8C The Miami-Dade County Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources and the Office of Emergency Management shall facilitate the coordination of emergency planning issues by increasing interaction The Whole Community Infrastructure Planner/LMS Chair is working more closely with RER in relation to integration of the CDMP into the LMS and the Adaptation Action Areas. ICE- 8D Encourage local, regional, State and federal agencies and organizations to work together in evaluating the existing criteria for designating places for shelter and reaching consensus. Such criteria should include but not be limited to: locations of shelter; structural integrity of shelter; space provided per person; and availability of essential provisions. Area for consideration: Identification of potential shelter locations, if not for hurricanes, for other local disasters that may require temporary sheltering. This has been announced in a municipal quarterly meeting by the Human Services EM Coordinator ICE- 8E Promote the coordination by federal, State, regional and local agencies of a public information and awareness program concerning various types of hazards and appropriate response. Area for consideration: Development of a PPI (Activity 330) for the CRS program and integration of annual events that OEM participates in. . Capital Improvement Element GOAL MIAMI -DADE COUNTY SHALL PLAN FOR AND MANAGE IN A FISCALLY PRUDENT MANNER, ITS FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE IN ORDER TO ADEQUATELY SERVE CURRENT AND NEW RESIDENTS WHILE EFFICIENTLY USING AND MAINTAINING EXISTING PUBLIC INVESTMENTS, AND MAKING TIMELY PROVISION OF REQUIRED NEW CAPITAL INVESTMENT. Objective CIE-2 Development in coastal high hazard areas will be retained at permitted levels, as of July 1, 1989. 354 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-66 Policies Policy Notation CIE- 2A. Public funds will not be used to subsidize increased overall density or intensity of urban development in coastal high hazard areas. However, public beach, shoreline access, resource restoration, port facilities or similar projects may be constructed. Mitigation through density control. CIE- 2B. Replacement of infrastructure in coastal high hazard areas will be at or below existing service capacity except where such replacement will improve hurricane evacuation time, mitigate storm damage, or meet regulatory requirements. Area for consideration: review the CHHA in relation to the new storm surge planning zones. Incorporate future risk of climate change impacts RER: Will be addressed in future update and other related policies. CIE- 2C. The Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) is defined as areas seaward of the elevation of the category 1 storm surge line, as established by a Sea, Lake and Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH) computerized storm surge model. Area for consideration: review the CHHA in relation to the new storm surge planning zones. Objective CIE-3 CDMP land use decisions will be made in the context of available fiscal resources such that scheduling and providing capital facilities for new development will not degrade adopted service levels. Policies Policy Notation CIE- 3A. The capital facilities and infrastructure implications of land use and development plans and implementation will be analyzed and set forth with attention to the following: 1. Safety improvements and elimination of hazard. Promotes mitigation opportunities. Objective CIE-5 Development approvals will strictly adhere to all adopted growth management and land development regulations and will include specific reference to the means by which public facilities and infrastructure will be provided. Policy Notation 355 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-67 CIE- 5A. It is intended that previously approved development be properly served prior to new development approvals under the provisions of this Plan. First priority will be to serve the area within the Urban Infill Area and Transportation Concurrency Exception Areas. Second priority shall be given to serve the area between the Urban Infill Area and the Urban Development Boundary. And third priority for investments for services and facilities shall support the staged development of the Urban Expansion Area (UEA). Urban services and facilities which support or encourage urban development in Agriculture and Open Land areas shall be avoided, except for those improvements necessary to protect public health and safety and which service highly localized needs. Areas designated Environmental Protection shall be particularly avoided Area for consideration: Analyze future risk with climate change impacts and design storm maps that show potential flooding implications in relation to future development plans. 356 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-68 Community Health and Design GOAL TO DEVELOP SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES THROUGH DESIGN AND FOOD ACCESS POLICIES THAT IMPROVE THE HEALTH OF RESIDENTS BY INCREASING PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, ASSURING SAFETY, PROVIDING A NUTRITIONAL FOOD ENVIRONMENT AND PROTECTING NATURAL SYSTEMS. Policy Notation CHD- 5A The County shall investigate onsite stormwater management alternatives, such as bio-swales and green roofs, which reuse stormwater and reduce the rate of runoff from impervious surfaces. Area for consideration: Development of onsite stormwater management for residents. Can residents in areas with no stormwater drains proactively do something to help reduce their flood risk and their flood insurance costs. RER: May need coordination with PWWM, DERM on this. CHD- 5B Enhance street cross section design standards to incorporate planting strips for both stormwater percolation and tree planting to provide shade. Promotes flood mitigation. 357 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-69 Miami –Dade Emergency Management Recovery Plan The Miami-Dade County Office of Emergency Management in 2013 revised the Recovery Plan. The new plan mirrors the National Disaster Recovery Framework. This plan provides an operational overview and organizational framework that will be implemented during all phases of the disaster recovery process. It details a coordinated roadmap for recovery operations, identifies the operational concepts, and provides an overview of organizational structures, which will bridge the gap between the Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) and the Post-Disaster Redevelopment Plan (PDRP) if necessary. The Recovery Plan addresses policies that promote an expedited, all-hazards disaster recovery process among all stakeholders including public sector agencies and organizations; non-profit and faith-based organizations; municipal jurisdiction and independent districts including water control districts, fire districts, and school districts. As part of this plan 12 Recovery Support Function (RSF) annexes have been created. These annexes include: • RSF Economic • RSF Environment • RSF Finance • RSF Health • RSF Housing • RSF Infrastructure • RSF Intergovernmental • RSF Land Use • RSF Mitigation/LMS • RSF Public Information/Outreach • RSF Social Services • RSF Transportation The RSFs are groups of agencies and organizations that share similar responsibilities into an RSF. During the recovery phase these agencies and organizations will work together to accomplish the missions assigned to their RSF. The RSF Mitigation Annex will initiate and encourage meaningful actions to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk to human life and property from natural hazards throughout the post-disaster recovery and reconstruction process. During the recovery phase this RSF will serve as the bridge between the Local Mitigation Strategy Working Group and the other RSFs. They will be responsible for working in partnership with the RSFs to incorporate mitigation into any recovery efforts, this can include: • Redevelopment of coastal areas that experienced flooding • Seeking and procuring alternate funding streams for rebuilding efforts • Incorporating mitigation best-practices in new housing developments • Educating the public on mitigation steps they should take at their homes and businesses As of September 2014 ongoing meetings are being held with the RSF agencies to further develop the strategies. The RSF Infrastructure group, with participation from the LMS Coordinator will recommend incorporation of the Adaptation Action Area language to help identify areas where redevelop may need to be reconsidered or limited. 358 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-70 Miami-Dade 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) The Miami-Dade 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), is adopted to guide transportation investment in the County for the next 25 years. The Metropolitan Planning Organization Governing Board just adopted the 2040 LRTP on October 23, 2014 after the review of the 2035 Plan had been completed. The LRTP includes improvements for roadways, transit, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, greenways and trails. It contains a “Cost-Feasible Plan” that categorizes projects into priority groupings based upon future funding availability. Priority I contains those projects scheduled to be funded through by 2014; Priority II contains projects scheduled to be funded between 2015 and 2020, Priority III contains projects scheduled to be funded between 2021 and 2025; and Priority IV contains projects scheduled to be funded between 2026 and 2035. It should be pointed out the Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP) has a planning horizon year of 2030 which does not coincide with the planning horizon of the Priority IV projects in the “Cost-Feasible Plan.” The “Cost- Feasible Plan” will continually adjust the costs associated with the funding availability for the Priority IV projects as the horizon year advances. This plan may be found at http://miamidade2035transportationplan.com/LRTPadoption.htm This plan was written in 2009, before the establishment of the Regional Climate Change Compact (“Compact”). This plan addresses climate change from the perspective of greenhouse gas emission reduction but does not seem to incorporate consideration for elevation of projects in relation to potential impacts from sea level rise, hopefully that will be a future consideration as identified in the CDMP TE-1H. Goal 3, Objective 3.1 “Enhance the capacity of evacuation corridors”. Linkage to the latest evacuation studies and SLOSH models is critical as areas for potential evacuation have increased significantly with the new Storm Surge Planning Zones identified in 2013. Area for consideration: ensure that the total lane miles is recalculated given the expanded zones. Goal 5, Objective 5.5 “Promote transportation improvements that are consistent with adopted comprehensive development master plans”. As is stated above the plans are developed on a different cycle. Area for consideration: Promote and hold meetings that bring various planning agencies together including emergency management for issues regarding risk and vulnerability, evacuation and mitigation. Linkage to CDMP LU-3F for new projects to be analyzed through a Development Impact Tool. Also linkage to the Compact RR-4. Goal 7: “Optimize Sound Investment Strategies for System Improvement and Management/Operation.” Area for consideration: Assessment of future risk to build to an identified standard to reduce future losses or the need to replace or retrofit before the end of the lifespan of the project. Goal 8, Objective 8.3: “Identify and reserve corridors and right-of-way (on roadways, railways and waterways) for future transportation facilities and services” Area for consideration: In alignment with TC-6D design in a way to prevent and control soil erosion, minimize storm runoff and minimize exposure and risk of climate change impacts such as increased flood conditions. Also linkage to CDMP LU-1H as possible sites for greenbelts. Mitigation measures to address development to a higher standard of future risk will undoubtedly require greater financial resources and support and in conjunction with the Compact (PP-11), identification of additional funding sources will be needed. Under the safety section there were three bridges that were identified for replacement or repair but no discussion if the modifications/replacement are taking into consideration future impacts of climate change and sea level 359 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-71 rise. Area for consideration: Linkage to the CDMP TC-7E to promote coordination with all relevant transportation agencies to address climate change impacts. 360 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-72 Florida Administrative Code 73C-40.0256 This rule establishes how the Department of Community Affairs will evaluate the impacts of proposed development on hurricane preparedness in the review of applications for a binding letter of interpretation of development of regional impact (DRI) status, in the review of the proposed DRO development agreements, in the review of conditions in DRI development orders, and in the review of applications for development approval (ADA). RER: This is applicable only to DRIs, which are not as many and as regular as applications to amend the CMDP. See previous comment under CM-8A. 361 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-73 Area for consideration: Does this rule take into account updated evacuation studies that change the areas designated for evacuation which thereby also impact the CHHA and HVZ areas? Does this FAC take into account future impacts of climate change and sea level rise? Notation (2) (c) “High hazard hurricane evacuation area” means the areas identified in the most current regional hurricane evacuation study as requiring evacuation during a category one hurricane event. Area for consideration: The SFRPC prepares the study but the determination for evacuation zones is done by the local office of emergency management. OEM utilized 18” and higher as the threshold for evacuation and in a review of the SLOSH data provided from the latest evacuation study showed more surge in the southern portions of Miami-Dade County than had been previously mapped for evacuation zones, where the northern portion of the county was in the A zone previously. There needs to be a clarification in the verbiage of the FAC as to whether the determination is based on the data of the SLOSH or the local emergency management agency for evacuation areas. (2) (f) “Hurricane vulnerability zone” means the areas delineated by a regional hurricane evacuation study as requiring evacuation in the event of a 100-year or category three hurricane event. Area for consideration: Same point as above in that the evacuation zones are set by local emergency managers and not based solely on the data received in the regional hurricane evacuation study. (2) (n) “Regional hurricane evacuation study” or “regional hurricane evacuation plan” means the studies produced by the Department, the state’s regional planning councils, the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, or the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which detail regional hurricane evacuation clearance times and public hurricane shelter availability according to various simulated regional hurricane events. The following studies are incorporated by reference: 2. South Florida Regional Hurricane Evacuation Study, 1996, South Florida Regional Planning Council; Area for consideration: This does not reflect the current dates of the 2009 evacuation study which provide a significant change in the footprint for potential surge in the SLOSH model (2) (q) “Vertical evacuation” means the preplanned use of predetermined structures located in the hurricane vulnerability zone as hurricane shelters, and the onsite or inplace sheltering of residents in single or multi- family structures which are elevated above the predicted flood levels anticipated within the hurricane vulnerability zone. Area for consideration: The onsite and in-place sheltering could be incorporated into the CDMP LU-3D. (5) (a) 3. Provision of onsite shelter where the proposed shelter would be located outside of the identified hurricane vulnerability zone and the project includes a community center or other facility suitable for use as hurricane shelter and provides, at a minimum, shelter space available and equal to the proposed development’s anticipated hurricane shelter space demand. Examples of community facilities include, but would not be limited to, clubhouses and recreation centers. All community facilities that are to be used as hurricane shelters under this mitigation option must be equipped with appropriate items as identified in subsection (2) above, and must be approved by local emergency management officials. Area for consideration: Incorporation into CDMP LU (5) (a) 5.(b) 1. Provision for the establishment and maintenance of a public information program within an existing homeowners association for the purpose of educating the development’s residents regarding the potential hurricane threat; the need for timely evacuation in the event of an impending hurricane; the availability and location of hurricane shelters; and the identification of steps to minimize property damage and to protect human life. In order to use this mitigation option, the developer must develop a continuing hurricane Area for consideration: • Not sure how this is being enforced or monitored. 362 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-74 awareness program and a hurricane evacuation plan. The hurricane evacuation plan shall address and include, at a minimum, the following items: operational procedures for the warning and notification of all residents and visitors prior to and during a hurricane watch and warning period; a public awareness program which addresses vulnerability, hurricane evacuation, hurricane shelter alternatives including hotels, friends and public hurricane shelter locations, and other protective actions which may be specific to the development; identification of who is responsible for implementing the plan; and other items as deemed appropriate. Where hurricane shelter space is being made available by the developer, it shall be addressed in the plan and shelter managers identified, and specific responsibilities established. Where the proposed development will include a private security force, the plan shall identify how the force will be integrated with the local sheriff’s personnel or other responsible agencies during an impending hurricane event in order to assist in the notification, warning, and evacuation of the development’s residents. The plan shall be developed in coordination with local emergency management officials. In order to use this mitigation option, the final plan must be found sufficient by the reviewing agencies and must address the recommendations provided by the reviewing agencies. • This could also include flood issues in areas where flooding is a problem and assist with the community outreach component of the CRS – Activity 330. (5) (a) 5.(b) 2. Provision for the elevation of all roads within the proposed development above the anticipated category three hurricane flood levels when these roadways are anticipated to flood during the category three hurricane event, therefore making evacuation impossible. This provision could also include the requirement of special drainage treatment for low-lying flood prone roads, elevation of roads leading to hurricane shelters which would be utilized by the development’s residents, or elevation of off-site roads which are low-lying and flood prone and which would serve as the only evacuation route for the development’s residents during a hurricane event. Area for consideration: Does this take into account future impacts of climate change and sea level rise? As the flood maps change and drainage challenges evolve is there a method to assess this locally? Can this tie into CDMP CON-5H (5) (a) 5.(b) 4. Provision of funds to be used for the purpose of procuring communications equipment which would upgrade the existing warning and notification capability of local emergency management officials. In order to use this mitigation option, the developer must provide reasonable assurance from local emergency management officials regarding the provision’s ability to reduce the development’s hurricane evacuation impacts. Area for consideration: How is this being done? 363 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-75 Appendix I: Community Profile This following an excerpt from the Miami-Dade County THIRA updated in 2015. 364 Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Revised: June 2015 Volume 1. Page 51 of 74 III. COMMUNITY PROFILE The Community Profile is the first component of the THIRA and provides valuable intelligence and situational awareness. In many jurisdictions, a detailed and in-depth community profile is developed as a key element of a Hazard Mitigation Plan; however, its utility goes far beyond that plan alone. The Community Profile is an overview of the political governance, economy, geography, climate, population, community assets, future development and trends, and commercial and industrial make-up of Miami-Dade County. The Community Profile provides Miami-Dade County with a solid foundation for developing a common operational picture for the THIRA, and can also be referenced for other activities, such as emergency training, exercises and actual incidents. A. CLIMATE The climate of a region is determined by the monthly or longer weather pattern conditions that exist within a specified area. Miami-Dade County, in Southern Florida, has a tropical climate with high humidity and precipitation. The seasons are determined by the amount of and changes in precipitation. The rainy season usually begins in late May and ends in mid-October, subjecting Miami-Dade County to thunderstorms, tropical storms, and hurricanes. The average annual precipitation in the county is 60.5 inches compared to Florida’s 365 Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Revised: June 2015 Volume 1. Page 52 of 74 annual average of 54.57 inches. The average temperature during the rainy season is 80°F in Miami-Dade County. Total precipitation in Miami-Dade County varies greatly between the rainy and dry seasons, peaking at 10 inches in June and dipping to less than 2.5 inches in December and January. The dry season lasts from mid- October to late May, and has an average temperature of 77 °F in Miami-Dade County. The Gulf Stream regulates the climate variants throughout the state with rare extremes of over 100 °F or below 32 °F. The average annual temperature of Miami-Dade County is 75.6 °F. B. GEOLOGY, HYDROLOGY, AND ECOLOGY Geology Miami-Dade County is located in the southern portion of Florida, whose geological conditions are considered young and formed around 120,000 years ago during the Pleistocene Period. Just below the ground surface there is Miami Limestone, the Fort Thompson Formations, and Anasta sia Formations. Miami Limestone consists of oolitic and bryozoans facies. The oolit ic facies are a combination of oolitic, small round grains, limestone and fossils. The bryozoans facies are a sandy fossil limestone. The fossils found include mollusks, bryozoanz, and corals. In some regions, the Miami Limestone reaches a thickness of 40 feet. Fort Thompson Formations underlies the Miami Limestone and consists of sandy soils, marine beds, and brackish and freshwater limestones. The Fort Thompson Formations can reach thicknesses up to 150 feet. The Anastasia Formations also underlies the Miami Limestone and consists of shelly limestone and coquina limestone. The Miami Limestone is highly porous and permeable and forms much of the Biscayne Aquifer system. The natural marl soils found above the Miami Limestone have been affected by drainage and erosion due to development and agriculture. The Biscayne Aquifer lies just below the surface, and due to the permeability of the soil, makes the aquifer vulnerable to contamination. Hydrology The hydrology of Florida is system of low-gradient drainage, high ground water table, and an extensive drainage canal network. There are two major aquifers in Florida that comprise the water table. Aquifers are areas of rock below the ground surface that can produce sufficient amounts of water to efficiently supply the communities within the region. There are three different types of aquifers: unconfined, where the water table is able to move freely without interference due to the lack of aquitard (a non-permeable formation); semi- confined, where the water table is partially confined due to semi-permeable formations; and confined, where the water table is completely confined by non-permeable formations above and below the body of water. The aquifers found within Florida are varying degrees of combinations of all three types. The Floridan Aquifer encompasses the entire state while the Biscayne Aquifer only supports the southern portion of the state. The Floridan Aquifer produces much of northern and central Florida’s water supply, however the southern region of the Aquifer has been polluted by brackish water from deep wells. The Biscayne Aquifer supplies the southern region of the state ; mainly Miami-Dade, Broward, and Monroe counties. This aquifer is one of the most productive aquifers in the world, but it is very susceptible to pollution from agricultural and industrial practices because of the permeability of the soil and rock formations. 366 Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Revised: June 2015 Volume 1. Page 53 of 74 MAP 3B-1 AQUIFER MAP OF FLORIDA Source: Miami-Dade County, Florida, Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) (Revised June 2013) The extensive system of levees and canals in Miami-Dade County and South Florida, managed by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), transports surface and ground water and protects against flooding and salt water intrusion. Precipitation during the rainy season is the main source of surface water, which travels from the northern and central regions of Florida to the southern region, flowing from Lake Okeechobee. The levees direct and store surface water to prevent flooding and to maintain reserves for use during the dry season. Ground water also flows from the northern regions to the coast and is drawn from field wells from the Biscayne Aquifer. Ecology The ecology of Florida is a relationship between organisms and their environments. Due to the unique combinations of Florida’s geology, hydrology, and climate, over 20 different ecosystems have been identified by scientists. The various classifications differ depending on the organization and scale of the system being evaluated, but the basic ecosystems include the following:  Coral Reefs: Colonies of polyps that form complex calcium carbonate shells to protect themselves against predators and pollutants. As the colonies compete for space or die, new coral grows on top to form a coral reef. There are over 30 different coral reefs identified around Florida that are home to thousands of plant and animal species. 367 Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Revised: June 2015 Volume 1. Page 54 of 74  Dunes: Mounds of sand that are created by coastal winds and are held together by grass vegetation. Over 60% of Florida’s coast is comprised of sand and the dunes serve as a protective barrier for inland areas from coastal winds and waves.  Freshwater Marshes: An inland standing body of water, generally year round, with little to no tree or scrub life. Grasses, sedges, and rushes act as a filter to remove particles and pollutants from the waters that flow through. There are four different types of freshwater marshes in Florida: wet prairies, sawgrass marshes, ponds, and aquatic sloughs.  Salt Marshes: Areas where freshwater and saltwater meet along the coastal regions. Salt marshes also contain little to no tree or scrub life. The vegetation that inhabits the areas is brackish in nature.  Freshwater Swamps: Areas inland where there is considerable standing water during the rainy season and the soils typically dry out during the dry season. The re is a variety of vegetation that inhabits the swamps including softwood trees, hardwood trees, vines, and ferns.  Upland Hardwoods: Areas of forest with nutrient clay soil that are typically bordered by sand hills and flatwoods in northern and central regions of the state. There is a vast variety of tree and plant life with no dominating species within the forests. Most of Florida’s state parks consist of upland hardwood ecosystem.  Bottom Hardwoods: Areas of forest with wet nutrient soil that typically border lakes, rivers, and sinkholes found throughout Florida. Bottom hardwood forest provides a transition area between the upland hardwoods, swamps, marches, and other wetlands and is dominated by Live Oaks, Red Maples, and Water Oaks. This region typically floods and is constantly changing because of the different climates and regions in which the forest is found.  Sand hills: Areas of forest with permeable, dry, sandy soils that typically do not flood. The forest is dominated by Longleaf Pine and Turkey Oak trees with different grass species blanketing the forest floor. The forest is vulnerable to fire due to the dry, sandy conditions.  Scrubs: Areas with permeable, nutrient poor, sandy soils found on higher elevations where the water table is low. Scrubs are communities of pinelands with an undergrowth of oaks, shrubs, and palmettos, and are fire dependent to regenerate because of the soil conditions and lack of water supply.  Flatwoods: Areas of forest of semi-permeable soil and limestone of level land that makes up 50 % of the covered land mass of the state. The forest is dominated by Longleaf Pines and Slash Pines with undergrowth of palmetto, wildflowers, and ferns. Flatwood forests are fire dependent to regenerate not only due to the soil conditions but the competition between the hardwood forest for space and sunlight.  Tropical Hammocks: Areas of hardwood forest with thick mounds of permeable soil and peat bordered by marshes, mangrove swamps, and flatwoods, but typi cally does not flood due to soil elevation. Hammock forests are dominated by Gumbo-Limbo and Pigeon Plum trees that are only found in southern Florida and contain plant and animal life found nowhere else in the United States.  Mangroves: Areas of mangrove tree habitat. There are three species of mangroves in Florida: the White Mangrove, the Black Mangrove, and the Red Mangrove. Each species of mangrove grows in different regions. All three species typically inhabit areas near saltwater or areas that are regularly flooded by saltwater. The Red Mangrove inhabits areas along the coast. The Black Mangrove inhabits inland areas below the water table. The White Mangrove inhabits higher evaluations where there is a lower water table. 368 Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Revised: June 2015 Volume 1. Page 55 of 74 MAP 3B-2 PHYSIOGRAPHIC FEATURES OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, 1999 Source: A.C. Lietz, USGS Water Resources Investigations Report 99-4094 (Tallahassee, FL: U.S. Geological Survey, 1999) 369 Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Revised: June 2015 Volume 1. Page 56 of 74 C. ENVIRONMENT Florida is a peninsula surrounded by two main bodies of water, the Gulf of Mexico and the Atlantic Ocean, resulting in an environment mostly composed of marshes, swamps, lakes, rivers, and springs. There are 1,711 rivers, streams, and creeks in the state, with notable rivers including St. John’s River, St. Mary’s River, and Suwannee River. There are 111 lakes in the state; Central Florida has the highest concentration of lakes, including Lake Okeechobee, the largest freshwater lake in Florida. The Miami Canal connects Lake Okeechobee to Biscayne Bay, crossing through Miami-Dade County. Miami-Dade County is the third largest county in the state, with an area of 2,431 square miles; 1,946 square miles of land and 485 square miles of water. The Everglades National Park encompasses one -third of the entire county. Most of the land is close to sea level with an average elevation of 6 feet above sea level. The eastern side of Miami-Dade County is composed mainly of Oolite Limestone while the western side is composed mainly of Bryozoa. Most of the county’s water mass is located in the Biscayne Bay area and the Atlantic Ocean. The Biscayne Bay is divided by South Beach and Miami Beach and is approximately 40 miles long and ranges from 2-10 miles wide. The agricultural and industrial development of South Florida since the early 1920’s has caused damage, erosion, and pollution to some of the ecosystems within the region. The establishment of the Biscayne National Park in 1968 served to protect marine, plant, and animal life along the coastal region. Since the 1980s, over 20% of the Bay has been degraded due to tourism and development. Efforts are in place to preserve aquatic life, rebuild reefs, remove air and water pollutants, protect endangered lands, initiate restoration projects, and ultimately reduce the human impact on the environment. The County protects the environment through a number of ordinances, including Chapter 24 , the Miami-Dade County Environmental Protection Ordinance, through which “the Board [found] and [determined] that the reasonable control and regulation of activities which are causing or may cause pollution or contamination of air, water, soil and property is required for the protection and preservation of the public health, safety and welfare” (Part 3, Chapter 24, Article I, Division 1, Section 24-2 of County Code of Ordinances). Other notable chapters that concern environmental stewardship include:  Chapter 7: Boats, Docks, and Waterways  Chapter 11B: Dumps and Landfill Sites  Chapter 11C: Development within Flood Hazard Districts  Chapter 15: Solid Waste Management  Chapter 24: Environmental Protection  Chapter 24A: Environmentally Endangered Lands Program  Chapter 32: Water and Sewer Regulations  Chapter 33: Zoning  Chapter 33B: Areas of Critical Environmental Concern  Chapter 33D: Biscayne Bay Management  Chapter 33F: Key Biscayne Beach Preservation 370 Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Revised: June 2015 Volume 1. Page 57 of 74 MAP 3C-1 ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS IN MIAMI-DADE COUNTY Source: Miami-Dade County Office of Emergency Management 371 Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Revised: June 2015 Volume 1. Page 58 of 74 D. POPULATION & DEMOGRAPHICS Miami-Dade County has experienced steady and rapid population growth, particularly in the 1960s and 1970s. Population doubled between 1960 and 1990. Projected growth through 2025 is expected to follow a similar trend, albeit at a somewhat slower rate. The principal driver of population growth has been and will continue to be immigration. Net immigration is projected to reach over 240,000 persons between 2020 and 2025. Clearly the effects of immigration over the past half century have dramatically shaped the ethnic composition of Miami-Dade County. It is expected that there will be a more moderate augmentation of Hispanics as the dominant ethnic group. Official population estimates for all jurisdictions within Miami-Dade County are presented in Table 3D-1 Population Estimates for Miami-Dade County. The most current estimated countywide population of Miami- Dade County is 2,617,176 people (2013 Population Estimates). The most populated city in Miami-Dade County is Miami, with an estimated 417,650 residents (2013 Population Estimates). An estimated 44.4% of the countywide population lives in the unincorporated portion of the County. Between 2000 and 2010, Miami - Dade County as a whole had a growth rate of 10.8%. Based on the 2013 Population Estimates, the most rapidly growing municipality in Miami-Dade County by average annual change is the City of Sweetwater, which has increased its population by an average of 17.5% each year between 2010 and 2013. The largest growth by sheer numbers was the City of Miami, increasing by 18,193 between 2010 and 2013. Additional information about Miami-Dade County's population and demographics is available in the Social Vulnerabilities section of the THIRA. TABLE 3D-1 POPULATION ESTIMATES FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY Source July 1, 2013 April 1, 2010 April 1, 2000 2010-2013 2000-2010 Total Change Percent Change Average Annual Change Total Change Percent Change Average Annual Change 2013 Pop. Estimate 2010 Census 2000 Census State of Florida 19,552,860 18,801,310 15,982,824 751,550 4.0% 1.3% 2,818,486 17.6% 1.8% Miami-Dade County 2,617,176 2,496,435 2,253,779 120,741 4.8% 1.6% 242,656 10.8% 1.1% Aventura 37,199 35,762 25,267 1,437 4.0% 1.3% 10,495 41.5% 4.2% Bal Harbour 2,613 2,513 3,305 100 4.0% 1.3% -792 -24.0% -2.4% Bay Harbor Islands 5,854 5,628 5,146 226 4.0% 1.3% 482 9.4% 0.9% Biscayne Park 3,180 3,055 3,269 125 4.1% 1.4% -214 -6.5% -0.7% Coral Gables 49,631 46,780 42,249 2,851 6.1% 2.0% 4,531 10.7% 1.1% Cutler Bay 43,328 40,286 0 3,042 7.6% 2.5% 40,286 Not Available Not Available Doral 50,213 45,704 0 4,509 9.9% 3.3% 45,704 Not Available Not Available El Portal 2,393 2,325 2,505 68 2.9% 1.0% -180 -7.2% -0.7% 372 Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Revised: June 2015 Volume 1. Page 59 of 74 Source July 1, 2013 April 1, 2010 April 1, 2000 2010-2013 2000-2010 Total Change Percent Change Average Annual Change Total Change Percent Change Average Annual Change 2013 Pop. Estimate 2010 Census 2000 Census Florida City 11,977 11,245 7,843 732 6.5% 2.2% 3,402 43.4% 4.3% Golden Beach 951 919 919 32 3.5% 1.2% 0 0.0% 0.0% Hialeah 233,394 224,669 226,419 8,725 3.9% 1.3% -1,750 -0.8% -0.1% Hialeah Gardens 22,642 21,744 19,297 898 4.1% 1.4% 2,447 12.7% 1.3% Homestead 64,079 60,512 31,909 3,567 5.9% 2.0% 28,603 89.6% 9.0% Indian Creek 90 86 33 4 4.7% 1.6% 53 160.6% 16.1% Key Biscayne 12,832 12,344 10,507 488 4.0% 1.3% 1,837 17.5% 1.7% Medley 842 838 1,098 4 0.5% 0.2% -260 -23.7% -2.4% Miami 417,650 399,457 362,470 18,193 4.6% 1.5% 36,987 10.2% 1.0% Miami Beach 91,026 87,779 87,933 3,247 3.7% 1.2% -154 -0.2% 0.0% Miami Gardens 111,378 107,167 0 4,211 3.9% 1.3% 107,167 Not Available Not Available Miami Lakes 30,571 29,361 0 1,210 4.1% 1.4% 29,361 Not Available Not Available Miami Shores 10,654 10,493 10,380 161 1.5% 0.5% 113 1.1% 0.1% Miami Springs 14,316 13,809 13,712 507 3.7% 1.2% 97 0.7% 0.1% North Bay Village 7,401 7,137 6,733 264 3.7% 1.2% 404 6.0% 0.6% North Miami 61,007 58,786 59,880 2,221 3.8% 1.3% -1,094 -1.8% -0.2% North Miami Beach 43,250 41,523 40,786 1,727 4.2% 1.4% 737 1.8% 0.2% Opa-Locka 15,967 15,219 14,951 748 4.9% 1.6% 268 1.8% 0.2% Palmetto Bay 24,339 23,410 0 929 4.0% 1.3% 23,410 Not Available Not Available Pinecrest 19,046 18,223 19,055 823 4.5% 1.5% -832 -4.4% -0.4% South Miami 12,088 11,657 10,741 431 3.7% 1.2% 916 8.5% 0.9% Sunny Isles Beach 21,720 20,832 15,315 888 4.3% 1.4% 5,517 36.0% 3.6% Surfside 5,954 5,744 4,909 210 3.7% 1.2% 835 17.0% 1.7% Sweetwater 20,575 13,499 14,226 7,076 52.4% 17.5% -727 -5.1% -0.5% 373 Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Revised: June 2015 Volume 1. Page 60 of 74 Source July 1, 2013 April 1, 2010 April 1, 2000 2010-2013 2000-2010 Total Change Percent Change Average Annual Change Total Change Percent Change Average Annual Change 2013 Pop. Estimate 2010 Census 2000 Census Virginia Gardens 2,461 2,375 2,348 86 3.6% 1.2% 27 1.1% 0.1% West Miami 6,240 5,965 5,863 275 4.6% 1.5% 102 1.7% 0.2% Unincorporated 1,160,315 1,109,571 1,204,705 50,744 4.6% 1.5% -95,134 -7.9% -0.8% Source: 2000 Census, 2010 Census, 2013 Population Estimates TABLE 3D-3 POPULATION BY RACE AND HISPANIC ORIGIN, 2013 Name Total Population Non-Hispanic Hispanic White Black Asian Other United States 316,128,839 62.4% 12.3% 5% 3.2% 17.1% Florida 19,552,860 56.2% 15.4% 2.6% 2.2% 23.6% Miami-Dade County 2,617,176 15% 16.8% 1.6% 1.0% 65.6% Source: 2013 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates GRAPH 3D-1 POPULATION BY RACE AND HISPANIC ORIGIN, 2013 Non-Hispanic Hispanic White Black Asian Other Hispanic Source: 2013 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates 15% 17% 1%1%66% MIAMI -DADE 56% 15% 3%2% 24% FLORIDA 63%12% 5% 3% 17% UNITED STATES 374 Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Revised: June 2015 Volume 1. Page 61 of 74 TABLE 3D-2 POPULATION CHANGE FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, 1980-2010 Year Population Percent Change 2013 2010 2000 1990 1980 2010 to 2013 2000 to 2010 1990 to 2000 1980 to 1990 State of Florida 19,552,860 18,801,310 15,982,824 12,938,071 9,746,961 4.0% 17.6% 23.5% 32.7% Miami- Dade County 2,617,176 2,496,435 2,253,779 1,937,194 1,625,509 4.8% 10.8% 16.3% 19.2% Source: 1980 Census, 1990 Census, 2000 Census, 2010 Census, 2013 Population Estimates GRAPH 3D-2 POPULATION AND PERCENT CHANGE IN MIAMI-DADE COUNTY AND FLORIDA Miami-Dade Population (bar), Percent Change, (line) Florida Population (bar), Percent Change, (line) Source: U.S. Census Data 35.6% 28.2% 19.1% 16.3% 10.8% 37.1% 43.6% 32.7% 23.5% 17.6% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0% 0 2,000,000 4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 14,000,000 16,000,000 18,000,000 20,000,000 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 375 Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Revised: June 2015 Volume 1. Page 62 of 74 TABLE 3D-4 RANK OF FLORIDA COUNTIES BY POPULATION SIZE (TOP 5 COUNTIES) Name Population Percent of State Population 2013 2010 2000 1990 1980 2013 2010 2000 1990 1980 Florida 19,552,860 18,801,310 15,982,824 12,938,071 9,746,961 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1 Miami-Dade 2,617,176 2,496,435 2,253,779 1,937,194 1,625,509 13.4% 13.3% 14.1% 14.9% 16.7% 2 Broward 1,838,844 1,748,066 1,623,018 1,255,531 1,018,257 9.4% 9.3% 10.1% 9.7% 10.4% 3 Palm Beach 1,372,171 1,320,134 1,131,191 863,503 576,758 7.0% 7.0% 7.0% 6.7% 5.9% 4 Hillsborough 1,291,578 1,229,226 998,948 834,054 646,939 6.6% 6.5% 6.2% 6.4% 6.6% 5 Orange 1,225,267 1,145,956 896,344 677,491 470,865 6.2% 6.1% 5.6% 5.2% 4.8% Source: 1980 Census, 1990 Census, 2000 Census, 2010 Census, 2013 Population Estimates GRAPH 3D-3 LARGEST COUNTIES IN FLORIDA AS A PERCENT OF STATE POPULATION, 2013 Source: 2013 Population Estimates 13% 10% 7% 7% 6% 57% Miami-Dade Broward Palm Beach Hillsborough Orange Rest of Florida 376 Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Revised: June 2015 Volume 1. Page 63 of 74 MAP 3D-1 POPULATION BY MUNICIPALITY, 2013 Source: Miami-Dade County’s Office of Emergency Management 377 Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Revised: June 2015 Volume 1. Page 64 of 74 MAP 3D-2 POPULATION DENSITY, 2010 Source: Miami-Dade County’s Office of Emergency Management 378 Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Revised: June 2015 Volume 1. Page 65 of 74 MAP 3D-3 POPULATION CHANGES, 2000-2013 Source: Miami-Dade County’s Office of Emergency Management 379 Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Revised: June 2015 Volume 1. Page 66 of 74 MAP 3D-4 POPULATION CHANGES, 2000-2010 Source: Miami-Dade County’s Office of Emergency Management 380 Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Revised: June 2015 Volume 1. Page 67 of 74 E. CULTURE Florida has a rich cultural history dating back 10,000 years through archeological discoveries of Native American nomads that lived off the land and local game. The Tequesta people inhabited the region unaffected by outside influence until the arrival of Spanish explorer Juan Ponce de Leon in 1513. After the first attempt to build a mission in 1567, the Spanish eventually gained and continued to control Florida for 250 years. The United States purchased Florida for 5 million dollars in 1821. At the time of purchase, the main industry was “wrecking,” and residents survived by retrieving goods from ships that crashed on the nearby coral reefs. Florida’s population and industry began to boom with the arrival of the railroad in 1896 by Henry Flagler and again with the development of subdivisions and tourist resorts in the 1920s. During World War II, nearly half a million men (one-fourth of all Army Air Force officers and one-fifth of the military’s enlisted) were trained at Miami Beach by the Army Air Forces Technical Training Command. After the war, many troops returned with their families to take-up a permanent residence, resulting in another population boom. Furthermore, Florida has become home to thousands of refugees with a significant influx following the Cuban Revolution during the 1960s and from Haiti in the 1990s. Since the first Spanish inhabitants, Miami-Dade County has developed into a multi-cultural destination. Nearly 1,400,000 of Miami-Dade County’s residents were born outside of the United States, accounting for 51.8% of the population. Miami-Dade County has nearly triple the state average and just shy of four times the national average of Hispanic residents with 65.6% of the population identifying as Hispanic (of any race). 381 Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Revised: June 2015 Volume 1. Page 68 of 74 F. POLITICAL GOVERNANCE Miami-Dade County was named after a soldier, Major Francis Dade, killed in the Second Seminole War. The county was formally created in 1836 under the Territorial Act as Dade County. In 1956, a constitutional amendment was approved by the people of Florida to enact a home rule charter. Up until then the county was governed and ruled by the state. Since 1957 the county has operated under a two-tier federation metropolitan system, which separates the local and county government. The local governments may be responsible for zoning and code enforcement, police and fire protection, and other city services required within each jurisdiction. The Unincorporated Municipal Services Area (UMSA) covers the residents of all the unincorporated areas within the County. The structure of the county government has an elected official, Executive Mayor, and the Board of County Commissioners with 13 elected members, each serving a four-year term. The Mayor is not a part of the Board of County Commissioners but has the veto power over the board. The Mayor directly oversees the majority of the operations of the County. The Board of County Commissioners is the legislative branch that oversees the legislation, creates departments, and business operations. Miami-Dade County is the only county in Florida where the Sheriff is appointed by the Mayor and is not elected by the residents. Miami-Dade County Departments:  Animal Services  Audit and Management Services  Aviation (Miami International Airport)  Community Action and Human Services  Community Information and Outreach  Corrections and Rehabilitation  Cultural Affairs  Elections  Finance  Fire Rescue  Human Resources  Information Technology  Internal Services  Juvenile Services  Libraries  Management and Budget  Medical Examiner  Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces  Police  Public Housing and Community Development  Public Works and Waste Management  Regulatory and Economic Resources  Seaport (Port of Miami)  Transit  Water and Sewer 382 Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Revised: June 2015 Volume 1. Page 69 of 74 G. BUILT ENVIROMENT The term built environment refers to the human-made surroundings that provide the setting for human activity, ranging in scale from personal shelter and buildings to neighborhoods and cities that can often include their supporting critical infrastructure (bridges, water treatment, highways, etc.) and key resource (schools, museums, etc.) assets. The built environment is a material, spatial and cultural product of human labor tha t combines physical elements and energy in forms necessary for living, working and playing. In urban planning, the phrase connotes the idea that a large percentage of the human environment is man -made, and these artificial surroundings are so extensive and cohesive that they function as organisms in the consumption of resources, disposal of wastes, and facilitation of productive enterprise within its bounds. The built environment can be organized into three broad categories (critical infrastructure, key resources, and housing stock), which are detailed more thoroughly in the Vulnerability Assessment. Critical Infrastructure  Airport  Chemical Sector  Communications  Energy Sector  Freight  Information Technology  Monuments and Icons  Pipelines  Solid Waste Facilities  Transit  Transportation  Water Control Structures  Water/Wastewater Treatment  Waterways & Ports Key Resources  Banking & Finance  Commercial Sector  Critical Manufacturing Sector  Defense Industrial Base  Emergency Services  Food and Agriculture Sector  Healthcare  Schools  Universities  Other Key Resources Building Stock  Commercial & Industrial  Governmental  Housing Stock 383 Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Revised: June 2015 Volume 1. Page 70 of 74 H. ECONOMY According to the Miami-Dade County Economic-Demographic Profile, 2013, the four most rapidly growing industries in Miami-Dade are accommodations & food service (34% growth between 2009 & 2012, 11% of total jobs in 2012), retail trade (29% growth between 2009 & 2012, 13% of total jobs in 2012), health care & social assistance (12% growth between 2009 & 2012, 13% of total jobs in 2012), and transportation & warehousing (10% growth between 2009 & 2012, 6% of total jobs in 2012). When compared to all firms in the County, minority business firms are characterized by their smaller size as measured by the number of employees, receipts and payroll. Although the numbers of Black and Hispanic owned firms, at first glance, appears high at 290,240 or 71.9 percent (as of 2007) of all firms in Miami -Dade County, most of these are self-employed firms with no employees (Source: US Census). The two significant external generators of economic activity in Miami-Dade County are international trade and tourism. While there is no rigorous way to determine the weight of international trade and tourism in Miami-Dade County’s economy, without doubt, both of these external sectors are vital components for a healthy and growing local economy. Tourism in the Greater Miami area continues to be an important component of the overall Miami-Dade County economy. Since 1980 tourism, as measured by overnight visitors, has grown steadily from just over 6.7 million in 1980 to 11.3 million total visitors in 2005. However, this growth had been marred by several significant downturns in tourist activity. From 1980 through 1986, there was a continuous decline in total visitors. In fact, it was not until 1988 that the total visitor count reached the 1980 level. In addition, from 2000 until 2003, total visitor count fell continuously, decreasing by 927,700. Currently, tourism continues to grow. For 2013, Miami- Dade County had record overnight visitors of more than 14.2 million, a +2.2% increase over the previous year. In addition, there was record spending by visitors of more than $22.8 billion by visitors to the Greater Miami area in 2013, a +4.6% increase over the previous year. The county also experienced record accommodations and food service employment of 110,800 jobs, an increase of +4.3% over the previous year and 48 consecutive months of increases (Source: State of the County 2014). 384 Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Revised: June 2015 Volume 1. Page 71 of 74 I. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT & COMMERCIAL TRENDS Please refer to: Comprehensive Development Master Plan Miami-Dade County faces many of the same growth issues that challenge communities around the country. With highly urbanized areas, suburban strip development, and farmland, the county contains many resources and assets, but must also deal with a variety of development issues and pressures as it balances continued growth with utilizing and maintaining existing infrastructure and investments. According to a recent Urban Development report for the county, Miami-Dade County wants to keep its agricultural identity, protect its unique natural environment, and encourage development to locate in areas with existing infrastructure, transit and other amenities. For example, one goal is to keep development from spilling toward highly sensitive lands, including the Everglades National Park. According to a 2013 Demographic Overview & Population Trends report issued by the Florida Legislature ’s Office of Economic and Demographic research, by 2030 all of Florida’s population growth will be from net migration, boosting Miami-Dade County’s population to an estimated 3.2 million people. Where these people will live is a critical consideration that drives decisions about growth management, provision of affordable housing, and transportation investments. Furthermore, these decisions will have a profound impact on how the County works to address issues related to disaster management and mitigation. Notable projects include the following: Urban Development Boundary: The Urban Development Boundary is a line that separates the agricultural and environmental lands from the urban areas. The boundary will be expanded to add 9.9 acres of land for commercial development of the current 16,140 acres of undeveloped land within the boundary. Please see the Environmental Protection Agency’s Growing for a Sustainable Future: Miami-Dade County Urban Development Boundary Assessment for more information on the UDB. Transit Development Projects: The Miami-Dade Transit system is about to embark on MDT10Ahead, the Fiscal Year 2015 -2024 Transit Development Plan (TDP) to enhance the transit system through increased efficiency, reliability, and financial sustainability. The MDT system is the 15th largest transit system in the country and handles an average of more than 353,000 daily boardings, and an average of 5,500 daily Special Transportation Service boardings. According to the TDP, the seven major goals of MDT10Ahead are: Improve Convenience, Reliability and Customer Service of Transit Services; Improve Operational Safety and Security; Improve Coordination and Outreach; Enhance the Integration of Transit Services to Support the Economy and Preserve the Environment Management/Operation; Maximize Use of All Funding Sources; Maximize and Expand Transit Services; and, Transit system shall fully meet requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Eleven new Metrobus routes have been proposed under the 2024 Recommended Service Plan (RSP) in addition to continued service on existing Metrobus routes (service to existing lines alone is expected to cost $124 million over the next 10 years). One of the most recent major transit accomplishments was the 2012 inauguration of the $506 million, 2.4 mile Metrorail Orange Line transportation to MIA, however future projects are looking to less expensive ways to improve service and transportation options. 385 Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Revised: June 2015 Volume 1. Page 72 of 74 Miami-Dade Transit currently has 6 park and ride stations with plans to add 7 park and ride stations (potentially up to 18 more stations). There are currently 30 transit centers, with plans to extend 8 current centers and add 6 new centers. In addition, the MIA Mover, a 1.27-mile automated transport system, opened on September 9, 2011, and transports more than 3,000 passengers per hour between Miami International Airport and the Miami Intermodal Center. The LEED gold-certified system replaced the Rental Car Center shuttle service, eliminating 1,400 daily shuttle trips and reducing carbon emissions from MIA’s roadways by 30%. IMAGE 3I-1 MIA MOVER Source: Steven Brooke Studio & Miami International Airport All Aboard Project Underway A multimodal hub station is planned for Miami, just east of Miami-Dade County Hall. The project is designed by All Aboard Florida, a privately funded, 235 -mile express passenger rail service. Passengers will be able to travel to and from Central Florida, with stops in Fort Lauderdale and West Palm Beach. Construction on the station and surrounding transit-oriented development (including a nine-acre transportation hub and a two- acre multi-use complex) is expected to begin in early 2015. IMAGE 3I-2 ALL ABOARD MIAMICENTRAL STATION Source: All Aboard Florida 386 Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Revised: June 2015 Volume 1. Page 73 of 74 Marlins Park: The LEED certified ballpark for the Miami Marlins was completed in March 2012 after a $515 million construction effort. With a seating capacity of only 37,442, fans can see their favorite players up -close in the smallest stadium in Major League Baseball (by actual capacity). IMAGE 3I-3 MARLINS PARK Source: Fishatbat.com Museum Park: Museum Park, created in 1976 as Bicentennial Park, partially opened to the public on June 14, 2014 after extensive renovations to the 30 acre parcel of land. The Park is home to the Pérez Art Museum Miami and soon the Patricia and Phillip Frost Museum of Science, and can host up to 45,000 people for large scale music festivals, conventions, and other events. IMAGE 3I-4 MUSEUM PARK Source: FrostScience.org 387 Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Revised: June 2015 Volume 1. Page 74 of 74 Brickell City Centre: The Brickell City Centre is a $1.05 billion mixed -use development project in the heart of Miami’s financial district. Construction began in July 2012, and at the time of writing, it is currently the largest project underway in downtown Miami. IMAGE 3I-5 BRICKELL CITY CENTRE Source: Miami Capital Properties Public Works Department: The county has several new construction and improvement projects conducted by the Public Works Department. The projects range from three months to a year in durat ion with projects including: intersection improvements, traffic signal safety improvements and installations, road reconstruction, sidewalk installations and repairs, bridge widening, and drainage system installation and replacements. Department of Transportation I-95 Construction The Department of Transportation is planning the most significant I -95 project since the installment of toll express lanes (northbound opened in 2008, southbound opened in 2010): replacing pavement, upgrading existing bridge railings, upgraded drainage, and installing electronic message signs. The project is expected to begin in September 2017, with two phases between Northwest Eighth and 79th streets. The project budget is $70 million and is expected to take 5 years to complete. 388 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-77 Appendix J: Economic Assessment Overview Community resiliency is heavily impacted by the ability of the economic engines of a community to survive a disaster to be able to maintain operations and provide jobs. As was seen after Hurricane Katrina in 2005, many businesses left the areas that were impacted and as such communities were heavily impacted economically. The economy in Miami-Dade is led by a diversified group of several sectors, these are: • Construction • Manufacturing • Wholesale and Retail Trade • Transportation and Warehousing • Financial Services • Professional and Business Services • Health Services • Leisure and Hospitality The two significant external generators of economic activity in Miami-Dade County are international trade and tourism. While there is no rigorous way to determine the weight of international trade and tourism in the Miami-Dade economy, without doubt, both of these external sectors are vital components for a healthy and growing local economy. Sectors of the Economy The major sectors of the Miami-Dade County economy based on employment are: Construction According to the Beacon Council there are a total of 5,000+ construction related businesses. It currently employs 30,399 individuals in Miami-Dade County. 3 Out of the top eight sectors this is the smallest in terms of employment. Manufacturing The manufacturing sector is divided into durable and non-durable goods. It currently employs 35,595 individuals in the county.4 There are over 2,500 businesses in the county devoted to the manufacturing industry. 3 Miami-Dade County 2013 Economic-Demographic Profile: http://www.miamidade.gov/business/library/reports/2013-economic-demographic-profile.pdf 4 Miami-Dade County 2013 Economic-Demographic Profile: http://www.miamidade.gov/business/library/reports/2013-economic-demographic-profile.pdf 389 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-78 Wholesale and Retail Trade Trade accounts for 195,118 jobs in the county.5 There are a total of 20,236 businesses in the county devoted to trade. The top trading partners with Miami-Dade County businesses is South America, Central America and the Caribbean. In 2011 South America accounted for $35 million in trade and Central America and the Caribbean accounted for $20 million. 6 Transportation and Warehousing As the “Gateway to the Americas,” Miami-Dade County has emerged as an international hub for commerce. Our proximity to Latin America and the Caribbean is a key strategic asset while the Port of Miami is the pivotal connecting point between the Americas and Europe, as well as Asia. The Port of Miami is the #1 container port in Florida and among the top ten container ports in the United States, as well as North America’s closest port to the Panama Canal. The Miami International Airport (MIA) is first among U.S. airports for international freight, second in international passengers and third in total freight. Among worldwide airports, MIA is ninth in international freight and tenth in total freight.7 Financial Services At a glance for domestic and international banks, as well as a host of other financial services companies, Miami-Dade County provides a proven platform for growth. For over 25 years, Miami-Dade has been home to the largest concentration of domestic and international banks on the East Coast south of New York City. Today, roughly 100 commercial banks, thrift institutions, foreign bank agencies and Edge Act banks have facilities here, along with hundreds of other wealth management, brokerage and other financial services companies. This sector also employs 67,439 people in Miami-Dade County.8 The top employers are Wachovia which employs 2,179 employees in the county and Bank of America which employs 2,000 employees. The other financial institutions that employ a majority of their sector include: • Bank United • Regions Bank • Ocean Bank • Suntrust Bank • Citi Bank • Mellon United National Bank • Northern Trust Bank of America 5 Miami-Dade County 2013 Economic-Demographic Profile: http://www.miamidade.gov/business/library/reports/2013-economic-demographic-profile.pdf 6 Miami-Dade County 2013 Economic-Demographic Profile: http://www.miamidade.gov/business/library/reports/2013-economic-demographic-profile.pdf 7 Miami-Dade County Aviation Department website: http://www.miami-airport.com/about_us.asp 8 Miami-Dade County 2013 Economic-Demographic Profile: http://www.miamidade.gov/business/library/reports/2013-economic-demographic-profile.pdf 390 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-79 Professional and Business Services Miami-Dade’s strong professional services sector provides ease and comfort when doing business locally, nationally and internationally. Miami-Dade County is home to hundreds of successful professional-service firms and licensed professionals that assist organizations of all types and sizes to meet their goals. This industry is comprised of licensed professionals and experts experienced in the following disciplines: • Accounting • Architects • Commercial Real Estate • Engineers • Legal Services This industry is propelled by Miami-Dade County’s access and influence in Latin America and the Caribbean; nourished by the area’s graduate and post-graduate educational institutions; and sustained by the 16, 237 accounting, architectural, real estate, engineering, and legal services firms that grow and flourish in Miami-Dade County. As of 2012, there were 126,531 employees in Miami-Dade’s professional services industries, which garnered total revenue of more than $57 billion. These numbers are sure to grow as more multi-national companies relocate and expand into Miami-Dade County, providing more opportunities for these firms. Health Services Miami-Dade County is currently home to more than 1,300 health sciences companies with 156,015 employees.9 South Florida’s health sciences industry is anchored in the north by the Scripps Research Institute and to the south by the University of Miami’s multiple research institutions and Jackson Memorial Hospital. The two top biomedical employers in the county, each employing over 1,000 employees are Beckman Coulter Corporation and Vitas Innovative Hospice Care. Leisure and Hospitality Miami has long been known as one of the world’s premier tourist destinations. Millions of visitors from locations all over the globe travel to our community for industry conventions and trade shows, business meetings, family vacations, and romantic getaways. National organizations regularly host their conventions at one of Miami- Dade’s world-class meeting centers, and our community’s emergence as a global hub for international commerce has attracted business leaders from Latin America, Europe, Asia, and beyond. Our area has also become a year-round destination with the cultural offerings and exciting nightlife that makes our area perfect for families 9 Beacon Council website: http://www.beaconcouncil.com/web/Content.aspx?Page=majorEmployers and Miami-Dade County 2013 Economic-Demographic Profile: http://www.miamidade.gov/business/library/reports/2013-economic-demographic-profile.pdf 391 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-80 and individuals wanting to experience everything Miami has to offer. In 2011, Miami-Dade County experienced another record year for the visitor industry with almost 13.4 million visitors to Miami-Dade County; an increase of 6.7 percent since 2010. The number of domestic visitors increased by 6.2 percent, while the number of international tourists increased by 7.2 percent. Figure 1: Employment by Industry 392 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-81 Largest Employers The top employers in Miami-Dade County are a combination of the private and the public sector. The top private sector employer is the University of Miami which employs 16,000 employees.10 The other top private sector employers are: • Baptist Health South Florida with 13,376 employees • Publix Supermarkets with 10,800 employees • American Airlines with 9,000 employees Additional top private employers are listed in Figure 2. The top public-sector employer in the county is the Miami-Dade County Public Schools which employees 44,132 employees.11 The other top employees include: • Miami-Dade County government employs 25,000 employees • The Federal government employs 19,500 employees • The State of Florida employs 17,100 employees • The Jackson Health System employs 12,571 employees Figure 2: Top Private Employers in the County 2010 TOP PRIVATE EMPLOYERS 12 Company No. of Employees University of Miami 16,000 Baptist Health South Florida 13,376 Publix Super Markets 10,800 American Airlines 9,000 Precision Response Corporation * 5,000 Florida Power & Light Company ** 3,840 Carnival Cruise Lines 3,500 Winn-Dixie Stores 3,400 AT&T 3,100 Mount Sinai Medical Center 3,000 Miami Children's Hospital 2,800 Sedanos Supermarkets 2,500 Wachovia, A Wells Fargo Co. 2,179 Assurant Solutions * 2,100 Bank of America 2,000 Royal Caribbean International/Celebrity Cruises 1,880 10 Beacon Council website: http://www.beaconcouncil.com/web/Content.aspx?Page=majorEmployers 11 Beacon Council website: http://www.beaconcouncil.com/web/Content.aspx?Page=majorEmployers 12 Beacon Council website: http://www.beaconcouncil.com/web/Content.aspx?Page=majorEmployers 393 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-82 2010 TOP PRIVATE EMPLOYERS 12 Company No. of Employees Beckman Coulter Corp. 1,400 United Parcel Service 1,150 Federal Express 1,134 Eulen America ** 1,000 Miami Herald Publishing Co. 850 BankUnited 750 Regions Bank 700 Ocean Bank 633 SunTrust Bank 400 Miami-Dade County Public Schools 42,132 Miami-Dade County 25,000 Federal Government 19,500 Florida State Government 17,100 Jackson Health System 12,571 Florida International University 8,000 Miami-Dade College 6,200 City of Miami 4,309 Homestead AFB 2,700 Miami V A Healthcare System ** 2,385 City of Miami Beach 1,950 City of Hialeah 1,700 U.S. Southern Command ** 1,600 City of North Miami Beach 626 City of Coral Gables 901 Figures 3 and 4 provide an overview of the types of structures located in each jurisdictional are within Miami-Dade. The information was pulled from the Property Appraiser database. They include commercial, industrial, residential and other. The other category includes: • agriculture, • cemeteries, • communications, utilities, terminals and plants • institutional • hotels and motels 394 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-83 Figure 3: Commercial and Industrial Facilities by Municipality COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL JURISDICTION R BLDG VALUE Count BLDG VALUE AVENTURA 234 $ 285,980,200 6 $ 13,857,021 BAL HARBOUR 4 $ 2,093,721 BAY HARBOR ISLANDS 96 $ 18,740,096 BISCAYNE PARK CORAL GABLES 1,285 $ 1,107,930,132 1 $ 73,244 CUTLER BAY 104 $ 101,894,369 854 $ 947,336,883 DORAL 371 $ 686,722,762 1 $ 1,295,212 EL PORTAL 6 $ 1,190,843 39 $ 17,525,002 FLORIDA CITY 105 $ 83,185,403 GOLDEN BEACH HIALEAH 1,523 $ 632,094,967 1,648 $ 532,423,721 HIALEAH GARDENS 138 $ 71,043,365 202 $ 56,490,291 HOMESTEAD 496 $ 200,732,181 124 $ 39,222,406 INDIAN CREEK VILLAGE KEY BISCAYNE 105 $ 33,405,802 MEDLEY 51 $ 15,213,276 455 $ 608,452,267 MIAMI 6,631 $ 3,263,786,483 1,383 $ 325,959,732 MIAMI BEACH 1,071 $ 970,746,572 11 $ 1,756,701 MIAMI GARDENS 400 $ 460,628,947 255 $ 308,073,693 MIAMI LAKES 150 $ 191,668,579 234 $ 97,165,268 MIAMI SHORES 74 $ 31,482,577 1 $ 84,384 MIAMI SPRINGS 136 $ 35,818,047 8 $ 2,711,847 NORTH BAY VILLAGE 15 $ 9,606,542 2 $ 4,402,072 NORTH MIAMI 594 $ 226,549,678 105 $ 42,136,211 NORTH MIAMI BEACH 497 $ 276,625,328 56 $ 15,192,672 OPA-LOCKA 169 $ 29,847,763 341 $ 139,268,372 PALMETTO BAY 246 $ 147,116,876 1 $ 1,540,548 PINECREST 145 $ 117,256,833 1 $ 185,510 SOUTH MIAMI 549 $ 93,321,471 33 $ 2,517,742 SUNNY ISLES BEACH 33 $ 31,771,205 SURFSIDE 46 $ 11,062,703 SWEETWATER 136 $ 365,640,700 56 $ 60,361,364 UNINCORPORATED MIAMI-DADE 5,130 $ 3,618,674,874 2,751 $ 2,075,401,210 VIRGINIA GARDENS 23 $ 25,527,254 3 $ 5,937,275 WEST MIAMI 95 $ 18,580,328 29 $ 362,563 20,658 13,165,939,877 8,608 $ 5,302,144,749 395 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-84 Figure 4: Residential and Other Structures by Municipality RESIDENTIAL OTHER JURISDICTION COUNT BLDG VALUE Count BLDG VALUE AVENTURA 22,018 $ 452,099,741 1,716 $ 223,586,025 BAL HARBOUR 3,013 $ 155,667,450 685 $ 3,316,767 BAY HARBOR ISLANDS 2,427 $ 141,230,896 47 $ 36,993,058 BISCAYNE PARK 1,070 $ 131,732,197 5 $ 816,927 CORAL GABLES 16,919 $ 4,277,349,220 474 $ 464,893,182 CUTLER BAY 13,532 $ 1,417,756,760 782 $ 111,172,820 DORAL 17,366 $ 1,627,776,013 514 $ 629,799,128 EL PORTAL 755 $ 81,625,819 6 $ 5,363,491 FLORIDA CITY 2,030 $ 96,121,151 98 $ 81,485,679 GOLDEN BEACH 349 $ 230,372,538 6 $ 836,173 HIALEAH 49,622 $ 3,205,866,586 2,451 $ 717,381,935 HIALEAH GARDENS 5,647 $ 375,181,636 54 $ 215,935,394 HOMESTEAD 17,031 $ 989,626,448 857 $ 368,912,797 INDIAN CREEK VILLAGE 32 $ 135,218,524 6 $ 5,148,996 KEY BISCAYNE 6,532 $ 780,754,604 419 $ 32,380,038 MEDLEY 74 $ 3,832,240 50 $ 23,856,290 MIAMI 98,407 $ 6,764,052,101 8,344 $ 3,664,217,872 MIAMI BEACH 46,120 $ 2,979,606,039 7,748 $ 1,147,149,903 MIAMI GARDENS 28,674 $ 2,138,130,155 307 $ 328,810,224 MIAMI LAKES 8,838 $ 1,255,028,443 172 $ 214,547,633 MIAMI SHORES 3,768 $ 531,019,167 44 $ 94,778,292 MIAMI SPRINGS 3,953 $ 526,199,792 81 $ 159,940,660 NORTH BAY VILLAGE 3,435 $ 78,001,468 413 $ 6,562,912 NORTH MIAMI 14,793 $ 1,092,360,712 529 $ 246,477,793 NORTH MIAMI BEACH 12,044 $ 745,290,290 679 $ 113,048,594 OPA-LOCKA 2,898 $ 188,308,792 146 $ 104,312,231 PALMETTO BAY 7,916 $ 1,553,502,217 248 $ 90,024,289 PINECREST 6,063 $ 1,833,813,872 42 $ 84,894,313 SOUTH MIAMI 3,660 $ 526,044,958 82 $ 121,909,220 SUNNY ISLES BEACH 15,698 $ 137,520,139 2,379 $ 20,127,377 SURFSIDE 3,122 $ 215,784,636 270 $ 10,227,544 SWEETWATER 3,478 $ 243,832,215 318 $ 82,690,698 UNINCORPORATED MIAMI-DADE 311,682 $ 28,338,300,470 14,862 $ 5,325,890,876 VIRGINIA GARDENS 621 $ 63,387,736 6 $ 6,796,096 WEST MIAMI 1,585 $ 180,806,673 19 $ 9,595,918 735,173 63,493,468,471 45,361 $ 14,866,211,711 396 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-85 Appendix K: Maps 397 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-86 Map 1: Miami-Dade Comprehensive Land Use 13 13 EMAP 4.4.3 398 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-87 399 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-88 Map 2: Land Use within Turkey Point Nuclear Power Plant 50-Ingestion Pathway 14 14 EMAP 400 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-89 Map 3: Map of Miami-Dade Flammable Natural Areas 401 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-90 Map 4: Miami-Dade 2010 Census Block Data 402 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 4: Appendices January 2018 P4-91 Appendix L: 2016 Community Survey 403 September 2017 Miami-Dade County, Florida Evacuation Study 2016 Miami-Dade County Office of Emergency Management (OEM) 9300 NW 41st Street Miami, FL 33178-2414 305-468-5400 www.miamidade.gov/oem 404 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page i of 265 405 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page ii of 265 CREDITS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners Miami-Dade County Municipalities and Residents Miami-Dade County Businesses, Organizations, and Partners Miami-Dade County Office of Emergency Management 406 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page iii of 265 Page Intentionally Left Blank 407 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page iv of 265 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary .................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Major Findings .................................................................................................. 2 Storm Surge Zones ................................................................................................. 2 Experience and Preparedness ............................................................................... 2 Emergency Information Sources............................................................................. 3 Suggestions for Improvement by Respondents ...................................................... 3 Evacuation .............................................................................................................. 4 Emergency and Evacuation Assistance Program ................................................... 5 Pet Ownership ........................................................................................................ 5 Demographics ........................................................................................................ 5 2. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Purpose............................................................................................................. 8 3. Methodology ............................................................................................................ 10 3.1 Questionnaire .................................................................................................. 12 3.2 Sampling & Demographic Comparisons ......................................................... 12 4. Hazard Risk Perception ......................................................................................... 14 4.1 Hazards Presenting the Greatest Risk ............................................................ 15 4.2 Hurricanes....................................................................................................... 18 4.3 Long Term Residents ...................................................................................... 22 4.4 Observations & Considerations ....................................................................... 26 5. Disaster Preparedness ........................................................................................... 28 5.1 General Preparedness .................................................................................... 29 5.2 Observations & Considerations ....................................................................... 34 6. Emergency Public Information, Accessibility, & Services ................................. 36 6.1 Preferred Information Source .......................................................................... 37 6.2 Information Accessibility ................................................................................. 46 6.3 Disaster Services ............................................................................................ 63 6.4 Observations & Considerations ....................................................................... 70 7. Evacuation .............................................................................................................. 75 7.1 Evacuation Experience ................................................................................... 76 7.2 Evacuation Compliance Behavior ................................................................... 83 7.3 Evacuation Influence ..................................................................................... 103 7.4 Hurricane Evacuation .................................................................................... 108 7.5 Evacuation Relocation and Destinations ....................................................... 112 7.6 Evacuation & Vehicle Usage ......................................................................... 120 7.7 Observations & Considerations ..................................................................... 142 8. Storm Surge Planning Zones ............................................................................... 147 8.1 Storm Surge Planning Zone & Awareness .................................................... 150 8.2 Storm Surge Planning Zone Accuracy Assessment ...................................... 154 Storm Surge Planning Zone A ............................................................................ 155 Storm Surge Planning Zone B ............................................................................ 156 408 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page v of 265 Storm Surge Planning Zone C ............................................................................ 157 Storm Surge Planning Zone D ............................................................................ 158 Storm Surge Planning Zone E ............................................................................ 159 Resides Outside a Storm Surge Planning Zone ................................................. 160 Do Not Know What Storm Surge Planning Zone Respondent Resides In .......... 161 8.3 Observations & Considerations ..................................................................... 162 9. Functional & Access Needs ................................................................................. 164 9.1 Evacuation Assistance .................................................................................. 165 9.2 Emergency & Evacuation Assistance Program ............................................. 171 9.3 Observations & Considerations ..................................................................... 174 10. Emergency Pet Preparedness ........................................................................... 176 10.1 Pet Ownership & Preparedness ................................................................ 177 10.2 Observations & Considerations ................................................................. 185 11. Households .......................................................................................................... 186 11.1 Data ........................................................................................................... 187 11.2 Observations ............................................................................................. 192 12. Demographics ..................................................................................................... 194 13. References ........................................................................................................... 208 14. Appendices .......................................................................................................... 212 409 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 1 of 265 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 410 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 2 of 265 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Evacuation is a process by which people are moved from a place where there is immediate or anticipated danger to a place of safety, offered appropriate temporary shelter facilities, and when the threat to safety is gone, enabled to return to their normal activities, or to make suitable alternative arrangements. A large-scale evacuation is a complex, multi-jurisdictional effort that requires coordination between many disciplines, agencies, and organizations. It is also only one element of the larger disaster and incident response effort. E mergency services and other public safety organizations play key roles in ensuring that an evacuation is effective, efficient, and safe. The purpose of this study is to establish a framework for understanding evacuee behavior, perceptions, and public comprehension of current evacuation related public information. 1.1 Major Findings Storm Surge Zones The most significant finding from this survey was the dramatic increase in Storm Surge Zone comprehension from the 2014 survey. In 2014, 50% of respondents did not know what Storm Surge Zone they were located in. In 2016, only 7% of respondents indicated that they did not know what Storm Surge Zone they were in, and an increased percentage of respondents in all Storm Surge Zones were able to correctly identify th e Storm Surge Zone they were in. Experience and Preparedness Most survey respondents had experienced a category 5 hurricane (39%) and were long- term Miami-Dade County residents (21 or more years). The most common preparedness activity undertaken by respondents was to procure adequate materials to protect the home or residence from a storm (65%, up 8% from 2014). Only 29% of respondents have signed up for Miami-Dade Alerts. In some of the open-ended answers, a number of respondents indicated that they were unaware of Miami-Dade Alerts and were interested to know how to sign up. This may be an area for increased awareness campaigns. Residents who have lived in the county for more than 10 years are more likely to have undertaken the provided emergency preparedness actions than those who have lived in the county for less than 5 years (except for signing up for Miami-Dade Alerts or visiting 411 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 3 of 265 local government websites for emergency preparedness information). Similarly, those who have experienced major or catastrophic damage are more likely to have undertaken the provided emergency preparedness actions than those who have never experienced property damage (except for visiting local government websites for emergency preparedness information). Finally, respondents who have experienced a major storm (Category 3 or higher on the Saffir Simpson Scale) are more likely to have undertaken the provided emergency preparedness actions than those who have experienced a minor storm (tropical storm, category 1, or category 2 ), who are more likely to have undertaken the provided emergency preparedness actions than those who have never experienced any tropical activity. Therefore, long-term residents, residents who have experienced major storm damages, and residents who have ex perienced a major hurricane are more likely to have undertaken preparation activities than those who have not lived in the county as long or have not experienced major damages or a major hurricane. Emergency Information Sources Television remains the highest rated source for emergency notices and information (95% “very likely” or “somewhat likely” to use), followed by the Weather Channel (92% “very likely” or “somewhat likely” to use), and local radio (90% “very likely” or “somewhat likely” to use). Miami-Dade Alerts reliance is high among all age groups, while older residents tend to rely on television and radio while younger residents tend to rely on internet media and websites. The least percentage of residents plan to rely on print media for emergency notices (46% “very likely” or “somewhat likely” to use), and only slightly more residents plan to rely on 3-1-1 (47% “very likely” or “somewhat likely” to use). Although social media was the third least likely source of information for respondents overall (51% “very likely” or “somewhat likely” to use), it is more highly rated among respondents 34 years old and younger (additionally, the survey demographics showed that respondents tended to be older and the response rate for respondents under age 34 is abo ut half of what would have been expected based on the county’s American Community Survey age data). Households that do not speak English rely more on word-of-mouth (46%) than the overall respondent group (32%). Suggestions for Improvement by Respondents The majority of open response suggestions for Miami-Dade County to improve preparedness services focused on materials and education. These requests included email, printed materials, educational outreach, and workshops. Those who make over $40,000 annually sought information in all of the requested formats (i.e., email, in person or phone outreach, local news, printed materials, text alerts, and workshops/education). Those who make less than $14,999 only requested more information on the local news and printed materials. 412 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 4 of 265 Evacuation Most respondents have not evacuated for any hazard in Miami-Dade County. One quarter have evacuated for a hurricane. New residents to Miami -Dade County (less than 5 years) reported that they would be most likely to evacuate because a public official ordered or recommended an evacuation. Those who have lived in the county for 6 to 10 years were most strongly influenced by their belief that the hazard posed a real danger. Those who have lived in the county for 11 to 20 years were mo st strongly influenced by a public official ordering an evacuation, and those who have lived in the county for over 21 years were equally influenced by an evacuation order and their belief in the hazard’s danger. There is very little difference between long-term residents who have experienced a weak storm and suffered minor damage and long -term residents who have experienced a strong storm and suffered major damage; both groups are most strongly influenced by public safety officials. Less familiar hazards (i.e. hazardous materials release and radiological incidents) received higher “very likely” evacuation compliance ratings while more familiar hazards (i.e, hurricanes and especially flooding) received lower “very likely” evacuation compliance ratings. This finding correlates to the research that suggests evacuation rates will be high for most hazardous materials events and lower for flooding events. Of those who selected reasons why they may not be able to evacuate, the highest ranked concern was their job (23%) followed by their pet (21%). Those with annual household incomes of greater than $80,000 were twice as likely to not evacuate due to their job (29%), their spouse (16%), or traffic (20%) compared to those with annual household incomes of less than $25,000 (job: 16%, spouse: 8%, traffic: 9%). Those with annual household incomes of less than $25,000 were twice as likely to not evacuate due to not having a place to go (19%), three times as likely due to disability/health issues (13%) and four times as likely due to lack of money (27%) compared to those with an annual household income of greater than $80,000 (no place to go: 10%, disability/health: 4%, lack of money: 7%). Although the majority of respondents selected a n evacuation influencer that Miami- Dade County can partner with (i.e., public safety officials, elected official, and local news and radio), a sizeable amount of respondents chose family, friends, or neighbors (26% combined). An effective approach may be to consider how best to reach those who may be influenced by their loved ones; one potential option for consideration is to have Miami-Dade County partners encourage listeners to share inform ation with their loved ones and encourage them to follow evacuation orders. The majority of respondents planned to stay with a friend or relative during an evacuation (52%) or a hotel (17%), but 9% planned to stay at a shelter and 6% planned to stay at a Pet-Friendly Evacuation Center (PFEC). Ten percent (10%) did not know where they would stay. Those with annual incomes of less than $25,000 were twice as likely to use the PFEC (7%) and five times more likely to use a shelter (21%) than those with annual incomes of greater than $80,000 (4% and 4%, respectively). 413 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 5 of 265 On average, respondents plan to bring 2.36 people per car during an evacuation (the difference between in county and out of county averages is 0.01). Storm Surge Zones do not appear to have a stron g correlation to the evacuation destination of respondents; the majority of all respondents in each Storm Surge Zone planned to remain in Miami- Dade County. Emergency and Evacuation Assistance Program Of the respondents who indicated they or someone in their household would need assistance during an evacuation or did not know (15% of all respondents), 44% are not signed up with the Emergency and Evacuation Assistance Program (EEAP). Pet Ownership Half of the respondents owned at least one pet. Three quarte rs of all pet owners reported that they have at least 1 dog. Of the 2,581 pets referenced in the survey, 44% were dogs, 29% were cats, and 28% were another type of animal. Therefore, Miami - Dade County can assume that most pet owners will have dogs and/or c ats, but there is still a sizeable number of pets who may need shelter and/or assistance that are not dogs or cats. Five percent (5%) of the pet owning respondents indicated they plan to bring their pet to the PFEC. Demographics Demographically, it appears that the survey is heavy on those who work in the government, completed post graduate work, females, older age ranges (notably heavy in the 50 – 64 age range and light in the 16 – 24 age range), and higher income. Some of these demographic differences were mitigated through the randomized mailing (such as employment and sex) however others did not see the same impact (such as education level and income) and some were even more off target (such as age). While it is difficult to say exactly why some of the demographic measures were off target, it is possible that certain populations are more likely to engage in/complete survey research or that the survey simply reached more of those populations. As was the case in 2014, this survey was designed to not only solicit information from the survey takers but also provide an opportunity to educate/inform participants on risks and services. This survey reached a larger population than the 201 4 survey and methodologies to reach additional portions of the populatio n will be considered for future surveys. 414 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 6 of 265 Page Intentionally Left Blank 415 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 7 of 265 2. INTRODUCTION 416 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 8 of 265 2 INTRODUCTION This report details the findings from the 2016 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study conducted in Miami-Dade County during the spring and summer of 2016. The main goal of the study was to understand the evacuation tendencies and needs of Miami-Dade County residents, as well as to identify trends in emergency management communications and community efforts. Questions were also included to gauge preparedness measures and risk perception in the County. The Miami-Dade County Office of Emergency Management commissioned the study to determine how their preparedness and communication strategies could better serve the community. 2.1 Purpose The primary objective of the study was to conduct a county-wide, multilingual survey focused on disaster behavior of the community as it relates to education, information, outreach, and response. This study was primarily designed to gauge evacuation habits of people living in Miami- Dade County, and to determine behavioral inputs that might impact evacuation strategies. Additionally, this study examined the most effective means of educating the public on preparedness, response, recovery, and mitigation information for all hazards, covering topics that include:  What emergency preparedness efforts have community members undertaken?  Is Miami-Dade County providing services the community needs during a disaster?  Do residents have an accurate perception of risk in the county?  Do residents understand the Storm Surge Planning Zone maps?  What sources does the public rely on for emergency information?  Where would residents go during an evacuation?  How would residents evacuate?  What promotes and discourages evacuation?  Is Miami-Dade County effectively communicating with all community groups (including but not limited to: those with access and functional needs; pet owners; those without vehicles; etc.)? The secondary objective was to provide residents with important preparedness information. The survey was used as a means to educate and inform residents of key preparedness and evacuation programs and policies. At the conclusion of the survey, respondents were provided with important information about Miami-Dade County’s disaster programs. Respondents were also given the option to provide their contact information if they wanted to further discuss concerns or questions regarding the County’s emergency preparedness services. 417 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 9 of 265 418 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 10 of 265 3. METHODOLOGY 419 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 11 of 265 3 METHODOLOGY Surveys were distributed through a variety of methods beginning on June 1, 2016 including e-mail blasts, social media (i.e., Facebook and Twitter), mailings, special events, and widespread distribution of promotional postcards (Appendix C) pointing to an online survey. Hardcopy surveys were distributed throughout the county, especially in those areas where access to the internet may most likely be limited based on previous study observations (i.e., mobile home parks, areas with less access to internet due to sociodemographic indicators, etc.). Community organizations were critical in connecting county residents with the survey, and the Miami-Dade County Office of Emergency Management (OEM) utilized their broad-based distribution lists of community stakeholders and partners to disseminate the survey to county residents. Additionally, 10,000 hardcopy surveys were sent to a random sample of Miami -Dade residents. Of those, 539 surveys were returned (5.39% response rate). It should be noted that some surveys that were returned had comments that it was difficult to fit the completed survey into the enclosed envelope, which may have impacted the return rate. InfoUSA was used to print and distribute the survey to the 10,000 residents, so the return envelope was not able to be examined by the County before the surveys were mailed. Future projects with return envelopes should consider if the envelope used is of appropriate size. Online and hardcopy survey results were compiled together upon the close of the survey on October 8, 2016. In total, 2,911 respondents participated in the survey. To ensure all data could be accurately correlated, only the 1,970 completed surveys were used in this report (please reference the first row in the table below). Approximately, 240 respondents were disqualified for living outside the county and 700 submitted incomplete surveys. Survey Status Online Hardcopy Total Completed 1,461 509 1,970 Partial 671 29 700 Disqualified 240 1 241 Total 2,372 539 2,911 Note: As the intent of this project was both to gather information and educate the public, the survey initially directed people out of the survey to Miami -Dade County’s Storm Surge Planning Zone interactive map to locate their zone. However, the survey was receiving high drop off rates due to respondents not returning after going to the interactive map. To mitigate the drop off rate, the link to the interactive map was removed and a static image of the map was included. After the static image was included, the drop off rate was reduced. 420 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 12 of 265 3.1 Questionnaire The survey instrument utilized a combination of descriptive and exploratory questions to gain an understanding of general preparedness intention s and behavior, as well as personal and demographic factors influencing decision making (e.g., information sources, risk perception, age, and socioeconomic status). Due to the diverse make-up of Miami-Dade County, surveys (both hardcopy and online) were available in English, Spanish, and Haitian Creole. Special requests (e.g. Braille) were arranged through OEM. The survey was a combination of multiple choice, Likert -scale rating (degree of agreement/disagreement style questions), and open -ended questions. It totaled 41 questions, and respondents took an average of 16 minutes to complete the questionnaire (both online and hardcopy). The survey instrument (Appendix B) contained questions that fall into a number of broad categories: general preparedness; hurricane history; storm surge familiarity; evacuation; information sources; transportation; evacuation assistance; pet evacuation; and demographics. 3.2 Sampling & Demographic Comparisons A convenience sample was determined to be the most effective survey method for this study. Respondents for this survey were selected from among those who volunteered to participate. No special weighting was done to reflect the demographic composition of the County. Demographic data (via the US Census and Miami-Dade County) was used to guide sampling strategies to target, as best as possible, participants who reflected the demographic makeup of the County (Section 12: Demographics). Additionally, 10,000 hard copy versions were sent to a random sample of Miami -Dade residents. The return rate of 5% provided a confidence level of 95%. Results of this random sample will be provided with the data gathered from the convenience sample below for comparison. Data that includes all survey responses will be noted with “All Survey Responses” while data that only includes the randomized mailing response s will be noted with “Randomized Sample.” 2014 results were also included, where applicable, and are labeled accordingly. 421 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 13 of 265 Page Intentionally Left Blank 422 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 14 of 265 4. HAZARD RISK PERCEPTION 423 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 15 of 265 4 HAZARD RISK PERCEPTION 4.1 Hazards Presenting the Greatest Risk Survey Question #8: Do you believe that your place of residence might ever be threatened by the following hazards? Please rate what hazards present the greatest risk to your household. Low Risk = Low impact on threat to life and property damage Medium Risk = Medium impact on threat to life and property damage High Risk = High impact on threat to life and property damage Figure 4.1.1: 2016 Risk Perceptions (All Survey Responses: Hurricane n=1,910; Wildfire n=1,830; Flood n=1,867; Hazardous Materials Incident n=1,830; Radiological Incident n=1,836; Public Health Emergency n=1,823; Sea Level Rise n=1,847) 58% 4% 26% 6% 13% 14% 20% 33% 11% 36% 17% 21% 38% 24% 9% 66% 34% 62% 49% 41% 41% 0% 19% 3% 15% 18% 7% 15% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70% Hurricane Wildfire Flood (example: rainstorm) Hazardous Materials Incident (example: chemical release) Radiological Incident (example: nuclear power plant) Public Health Emergency Sea Level Rise High Risk Medium Risk Low Risk Not Applicable 424 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 16 of 265 Figure 4.1.2: 2016 Risk Perceptions (Randomized Mailing: Hurricane n=489; Wildfire n=468; Flood n=480; Hazardous Materials Incident n=471; Radiological Incident n=476; Public Health Emergency n=464; Sea Level Rise n=470) Figure 4.1.3: 2014 Risk Perceptions (Hurricane n=2,029; Wildfire n=1,987; Flood n=2,001; Hazardous Materials Incident n=1,997; Radiological Incident n=1,996) 58% 3% 26% 6% 11% 16% 20% 33% 10% 38% 16% 21% 41% 22% 8% 68% 34% 65% 52% 36% 43% 1% 18% 2% 14% 17% 7% 15% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80% Hurricane Wildfire Flood (example: rainstorm) Hazardous Materials Incident (example: chemical release) Radiological Incident (example: nuclear power plant) Public Health Emergency Sea Level Rise High Risk Medium Risk Low Risk Not Applicable 425 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 17 of 265 52% 6% 22% 10% 15% 36% 17% 42% 22% 20% 11% 63% 33% 57% 51% 1% 14% 3% 11% 14% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70% Hurricane Wildfire Flood (example: rainstorm) Hazardous Materials Incident (example: chemical release) Radiological Incident (example: nuclear power plant) High Risk Medium Risk Low Risk Not Applicable 426 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 18 of 265 4.2 Hurricanes Survey Question #9: Please indicate the strongest tropical storm/hurricane you have experienced. Figure 4.2.1: 2016 Strongest Tropical Storm/Hurricane Experienced (All Survey Responses: n=1,935) Figure 4.2.2: 2016 Strongest Tropical Storm/Hurricane Experienced (Randomized Mailing: n=494) 5% 5% 5% 7% 14% 22% 39% 3% 1% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45% I have never experienced a tropical storm/hurricane before Tropical storm (wind 39 - 73 mph) Category 1 hurricane (wind 74 - 95 mph) Category 2 hurricane (wind 96 - 110 mph) Category 3 hurricane (wind 111 - 129 mph) Category 4 hurricane (wind 130 - 156 mph) Category 5 hurricane (wind 157+ mph) Do not know Not applicable 3% 5% 4% 8% 14% 23% 40% 2% 0% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45% I have never experienced a tropical storm/hurricane before Tropical storm (wind 39 - 73 mph) Category 1 hurricane (wind 74 - 95 mph) Category 2 hurricane (wind 96 - 110 mph) Category 3 hurricane (wind 111 - 129 mph) Category 4 hurricane (wind 130 - 156 mph) Category 5 hurricane (wind 157+ mph) Do not know Not applicable 427 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 19 of 265 Figure 4.2.3: 2016 Strongest Tropical Storm/Hurricane Experienced Based on Years of Residency in Miami-Dade County (All Survey Responses) (0 to 5 Years n=196; 6 to 10 Years n=121; 11 to 20 Years n=285; 21+ Years n=1,308) 32% 17% 10% 3% 12% 9% 10% 5% 2% 16% 27% 8% 10% 12% 10% 11% 3% 4% 2% 4% 9% 19% 28% 20% 15% 3% 1% 1% 2% 3% 5% 11% 26% 51% 2% 0% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60% I have never experienced a tropical storm/hurricane before Tropical storm (wind 39 - 73 mph) Category 1 hurricane (wind 74 - 95 mph) Category 2 hurricane (wind 96 - 110 mph) Category 3 hurricane (wind 111 - 129 mph) Category 4 hurricane (wind 130 - 156 mph) Category 5 hurricane (wind 157+ mph) Do not know Not applicable 0 to 5 Years 6 to 10 Years 11 to 20 Years 21+ Years 428 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 20 of 265 Survey Question #10: Please select the answer that best describes your past experience. Figure 4.2.4: 2016 Property Damage Experience (All Survey Responses: n=1,922) Figure 4.2.5: 2016 Property Damage Experience (Randomized Mailing: n=493) 23% 46% 22% 10% I have never experienced property damage or loss from hurricane(s) I have experienced minor property damage and loss from hurricane(s) I have experienced major property damage and loss from hurricane(s) I have experienced catastrophic property damage and loss from hurricane(s) 23% 48% 22% 8% I have never experienced property damage or loss from hurricane(s) I have experienced minor property damage and loss from hurricane(s) I have experienced major property damage and loss from hurricane(s) I have experienced catastrophic property damage and loss from hurricane(s) 429 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 21 of 265 Figure 4.2.6: 2014 Property Damage Experience (n=2,027) Figure 4.2.7: 2016 Property Damage Experience Based on Years of Residency in Miami-Dade County (All Survey Responses) (0 to 5 Years n=193; 6 to 10 Years n=118; 11 to 20 Years n=281; 21+ Years n=1,305) 32% 44% 18% 7% I have never experienced property damage or loss from hurricane(s) I have experienced minor property damage and loss from hurricane(s) I have experienced major property damage and loss from hurricane(s) I have experienced catastrophic property damage and loss from hurricane(s) 64% 61% 35% 11% 23% 30% 51% 50% 10% 8% 12% 27% 2% 2% 2% 13% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% 0 to 5 Years 6 to 10 Years 11 to 20 Years 21+ Years I have never experienced property damage or loss from hurricane(s) I have experienced minor property damage and loss from hurricane(s) I have experienced major property damage and loss from hurricane(s) I have experienced catastrophic property damage and loss from hurricane(s) 430 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 22 of 265 4.3 Long Term Residents Some research has found that long-term residents of coastal areas, who experienced minor hurricanes without severe damages, become complacent, and are less likely to evacuate in subsequent events (Windham et al., 1977). To test this finding for Miami- Dade County, respondents who have lived in Miami-Dade County for at least 11 years were broken into two groups: 1. Minor Storms: Have experienced a tropical storm, Category 1 or 2 hurricane and have never experienced property damage or loss or have only experienced minor property damage or loss (column 1 for each question in Figure 4.3.1). 2. Major Storms: Have experienced a Category 3, 4, or 5 hurricane and have experienced major or catastrophic damage or loss (column 2 for each question in Figure 4.3.1). Three survey questions were measured: Survey Question #12: If a hurricane evacuation was ordered by public safety officials for your area, please indicate how likely you would be to do the following. Figure 4.3.1: Evacuation Actions for Long-Term Residents based on Storm Strength Experience & Damage Experience (Immediately evacuate: Minor n=170, Major n=483; First consult with family and friends: Minor n=148, Major n=428; Wait and see: Minor n=143, Major n=434; Refuse to evacuate: Minor n=137, Major n=415) 431 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 23 of 265 Survey Question #13: If one of the hazards below threatened your community, and an evacuation for your area was ordered by public safety officials, how likely would you be to evacuate?* Figure 4.3.2: Evacuation Compliance After Order for Long-Term Residents based on Storm Strength Experience & Damage Experience (Minor n=179; Major n=515) *Since the research and filters only apply to hurricanes, only the respondents answer to hurricanes is shown above. Survey Question #18: If a hurricane was threatening Miami-Dade County, and an evacuation was ordered for your area, how likely would you be to evacuate for the following Hurricane “Categories”? Figure 4.3.3: Evacuation Compliance by Storm Category for Long-Term Residents based on Storm Strength Experience & Damage Experience (Category 1: Minor n=161, Major n=485; Category 2: 55% 49% 37% 41% 26% 27% 6% 4% 28% 30% 37% 36% 33% 33% 9% 8% 12% 19% 24% 21% 41% 38% 75% 81% 5% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 10% 7% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Minor Storm Major Storm Minor Storm Major Storm Minor Storm Major Storm Minor Storm Major Storm Immediately evacuate as instructed. I would first consult with family and friends before making a decision to evacuate. Wait and see how bad the situation is going to be before deciding to evacuate. Refuse to evacuate no matter what. Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do Not Know 73% 61% 20% 27% 7% 11% 1% 1% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Minor Storm Major StormHurricane Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do not know 432 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 24 of 265 Minor n=164, Major n=489; Category 3: Minor n=163, Major n=496; Category 4: Minor n=162, Major n=501; Category 5: Minor n=162, Major n=507) 22% 8% 30% 13% 56% 32% 82% 63% 90% 81% 17% 13% 27% 18% 29% 32% 11% 26% 4% 13% 60% 77% 40% 67% 11% 36% 3% 11% 2% 5% 2% 1% 4% 1% 3% 4% 4% 1% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Minor Storm Major Storm Minor Storm Major Storm Minor Storm Major Storm Minor Storm Major Storm Minor Storm Major Storm Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category 5 Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do not know 433 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 25 of 265 Comparative Analysis: National Trends and Findings  Bowser and Cutter found that “as a general rule, individuals are likely to react to hazards they feel present a danger to them or their families… A multitude of cultural and demographic factors may influence personal risk perception and thus indirectly influence evacuation behavior. These indirect influences carry at least some significance in hurricane risk perception and decision making, but are not the same consistent set of indicators across all of the research” (2015).  Experiencing a disaster or a close call with an event often shapes people's response to future events; however, it does not do so in a predictable or systematic way. Direct hazard experience does not affect interpretation of warning information, decision processes, behavior, or information seeking (Lindell and Perry, 2003).  Others have suggested that long-term residents of coastal areas, who experienced minor hurricanes without severe damages, become complacent, and are less likely to evacuate in subsequent events (Windham et al., 1977).  Others have suggested previous experience has had a mixed effect on warning response (Sorensen, 2000). In some cases it deters response and in others it increases response.  Perception of risk and previous experience with hurricane evacuations are two of the most predictive indicators of future evacuation behavior. Prior experience both influences behavior positively (Dash and Gladwin 2007; Adeola 2008; Solis et al. 2010) and negatively (Arlikatti, et al., 2006). 434 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 26 of 265 4.4 Observations & Considerations Overall, respondents indicated that they feel most at risk for hurricanes (58% rated as “high risk,” 33% as “medium risk,” and 9% as “low risk”), followed by flooding (26% rated as “high risk,” 36% rated as “medium risk,” and 34 % rated as “low risk) and sea level rise (20% rated as “high risk,” 24% rated as “medium risk,” and 41% rated as “low risk) (Figure 4.1.1). Respondents were least concerned about wildfire (4% rated as “high risk,” 11% rated as “medium risk,” and 66% rated as “low risk”). This risk ranking follows the same order as the 2014 findings (with the exception of sea level risk & public health emergency, which were added in the 2016 survey). Risk ranking: 1. Hurricane 2. Flood 3. Sea Level Rise 4. Public Health Emergency 5. Radiological Incident 6. Hazardous Materials Release 7. Wildfire The largest percentage of respondents (39%) have experienced a Category 5 hurricane (Figure 4.2.1). This correlates with the 69% of respondents who have lived in Miami - Dade County for 21 or more years; Hurricane Andrew, a Category 5 storm, made landfall in 1992, 24 years before this survey. Three quarters of respondents have experienced a major hurricane (Category 3 or greater), 17% have only experienced a Category 2, 1, or tropical storm, and 5% have never experienced a tropical system. However, it must be noted that previous research has determined that d irect hazard experience does not affect interpretation of warning information, decision processes, behavior, or information seeking (Lindell and Perry, 2003). There is a general trend between length of residency in the county and strength of storm experienced. In general, respondents who have lived in the county for a smaller period of time have experienced weaker storms and those who have lived in the county longer have experienced stronger storms (Figure 4.2.3). The 2016 results found that nearly half of the re spondents have experienced minor property damage or loss from a hurricane, with just under a quarter who have never experienced loss and 10% who have experienced catastrophic property damage and loss (Figure 4.2.4). This is a change from the 2014 survey; although nearly identical percentages of respondents indicated they had experienced minor property damage or loss, 32% indicated they had never experienced property damage (9% more than 2016). That 9% was dispersed among the three damage categories (minor, major, and catastrophic damage and loss). This change may be due to residents moving in and out of the county, the sample used for this survey, or a true increase in storm damage experiences. 435 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 27 of 265 Again, there is a general but not direct correlation between ye ars of residency in Miami- Dade County and extent of damages or loss. Generally, the respondent’s damage or loss experience increases the longer they live in the county (Figure 4.2.7). Windham (et al., 1977) suggested that long-term residents of coastal areas, who experienced minor hurricanes without severe damages, become complacent, and are less likely to evacuate in subsequent events. This survey did not support that finding. For the purposes of this survey, long-term residents were considered to have lived in the County for 11 or more years. Minor storms included tropical storms, Category 1 and Category 2 storms and “without severe damage” was considered none or minor. Major storms include Category 3 and greater storms and severe damages were considered major or catastrophic. Fifty-five percent (55%) of “minor storm” residents were “very likely” to evacuate immediately as instructed, compared to 49% of “major storm” residents. Additionally, 19% of “major storm” residents were “not likely” to evacuate immediately as instructed, compared to 12% of “minor storm” residents (Figure 4.3.1). Twelve percent (12%) more “minor storm” residents than “major storm” residents were “very likely” to comply with a hurricane evacuation order from a public safety official (Figure 4.3.2), and in every hurricane category, “minor storm” residents are more “very likely” to comply with an evacuation notice than “major storm” residents (Figure 4.3.3). In Category 1 and 2 storms, "minor storm” residents are nearly twice as likely to comply with an evacuation order as “major storm” residents (when combining both “very likely” and “somewhat likely” responses). Therefore, it does not appear Windham’s 1977 research holds true for Miami-Dade County, and “minor storm” residents may actu ally be less complacent and more likely to evacuate in subsequent events than “major storm” residents. More information on evacuation compliance is available in Section 7. 436 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 28 of 265 5. DISASTER PREPAREDNESS 437 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 29 of 265 5 GENERAL DISASTER PREPAREDNESS 5.1 General Preparedness Survey Question #5: Please indicate those activities your household has done to prepare for emergencies and disasters. Select ALL that apply. My household has… Figure 5.1.1: 2016 Preparedness Activities (All Survey Responses: n=1,917) Figure 5.1.2: 2016 Preparedness Activities (Randomized Mailing: n=497) 39% 46% 48% 40% 31% 37% 29% 34% 65% 60% 6% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70% An emergency preparedness plan Flood insurance Windstorm insurance A disaster supply kit An evacuation plan A weather radio Signed up for Miami-Dade Alerts Homeowners or renter’s insurance for place of residence Other (please specify) 438 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 30 of 265 Figure 5.1.3: 2014 Preparedness Activities (n=1,982) 32% 48% 51% 34% 23% 37% 13% 17% 71% 67% 8% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80% An emergency preparedness plan Flood insurance Windstorm insurance A disaster supply kit An evacuation plan A weather radio Signed up for Miami-Dade Alerts Homeowners or renter’s insurance for place of residence Other (please specify) 42% 43% 41% 45% 27% 34% 57% 44% 22% 4% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60% An emergency preparedness plan Flood Insurance Windstorm Insurance A disaster supply kit A family evacuation plan A weather radio Signed up for Miami-Dade Alerts Other (please specify) 439 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 31 of 265 Figure 5.1.4: 2016 Preparedness Activities (All Survey Responses): Residents for 0 to 5 years in Miami-Dade County compared to those who have lived in Miami-Dade County for 11 or more years. (0 to 5 years n=197; 11+ years n=1,588) 32% 26% 22% 29% 27% 24% 29% 43% 45% 53% 4% 41% 49% 52% 41% 32% 40% 28% 33% 68% 62% 7% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80% An emergency preparedness plan Flood insurance Windstorm insurance A disaster supply kit An evacuation plan A weather radio Signed up for Miami-Dade Alerts Visited local government web site(s) for emergency preparedness information Adequate materials to protect my home/residence from storms and hurricanes (i.e. hurricane shutters, impact windows and doors) Homeowners or renter’s insurance for place of residence Other (please specify) 0 - 5 Years 11+ Years 440 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 32 of 265 Figure 5.1.5: 2016 Preparedness Activities (All Survey Responses): Respondents who have never experienced hurricane property damage compared to those who have experienced major to catastrophic hurricane property damage (never experienced property damage n=441; experienced major or catastrophic property damage n=605). 32% 34% 33% 31% 28% 31% 28% 39% 49% 51% 5% 46% 51% 59% 44% 35% 42% 30% 33% 73% 68% 7% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80% An emergency preparedness plan Flood insurance Windstorm insurance A disaster supply kit An evacuation plan A weather radio Signed up for Miami-Dade Alerts Visited local government web site(s) for emergency preparedness information Adequate materials to protect my home/residence from storms and hurricanes (i.e. hurricane shutters, impact windows and doors) Homeowners or renter’s insurance for place of residence Other (please specify) Never experienced property damage Experienced major or catastrophic property damage 441 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 33 of 265 Figure 5.1.6: 2016 Preparedness Activities (All Survey Responses): Respondents based on the strongest storm they have experienced (Never experienced a tropical storm/hurricane n=99; Experienced a tropical storm, category 1, and/or category 2 n=316; Experienced a category 3, category 4, and/or category 5 m=326). 29% 30% 30% 28% 28% 24% 25% 44% 45% 50% 1% 37% 42% 32% 34% 28% 30% 28% 37% 53% 54% 6% 41% 48% 54% 42% 32% 40% 29% 33% 69% 63% 7% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80% An emergency preparedness plan Flood insurance Windstorm insurance A disaster supply kit An evacuation plan A weather radio Signed up for Miami-Dade Alerts Visited local government web site(s) for emergency preparedness information Adequate materials to protect my home/residence from storms and hurricanes (i.e. hurricane shutters, impact windows and doors) Homeowners or renter’s insurance for place of residence Other (please specify) Never experienced a tropical storm/hurricane Experienced a tropical storm, category 1, and/or category 2 Experienced a category 3, category 4, and/or category 5 442 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 34 of 265 Open-ended Response Summary: The “other” answers provided a number of varied responses. Many people indicated they have a backup generator, store spare food and water, and have done home improvements. Others indicated they had lanterns, flashlights, and batteries, or have signed up for Miami-Dade Alerts. Some people indicated that they live in a group facility (apartment complex, college dorm, hospice, etc.), and imply that they would rely on those running the facility. Although there were plenty of responses covering what residents have done, there were still a number of people who indicated that they have not done anything to prepare for emergencies and disasters; of the 1,917 who answered the question, 17 left an open-ended answer indicating that they had not done anything to prepare, or 0.9% of respondents. However, “none” was not offered as an option in the multiple choice, so this percentage may not be a correct representation. 5.2 Observations & Considerations The most common preparedness activity undertaken by respondents was adequate materials to protect the home or residence from a storm (65%) (Figure 5.1.1). This was also the most common activity in 2014, however 8% more respondents indicated they had taken this action in 2016 than in 2014. Only 29% of respondents indicated they had signed up for Miami-Dade Alerts. In later open-ended answers, a number of respondents indicated that they were unaware of Miami -Dade Alerts & were interested to know how to sign up. This may be an area for increased awareness campaigns. With the exception of visiting local government website for emergency preparedness information and a slight difference in signing up for Miami -Dade Alerts (1%), residents who have lived in the county for more than 10 years are more likely to have undertaken all of the provided emergency preparedness actions than those who have lived in the county for less than 5 years (Figure 5.1.4). Similarly, with the exception of visiting local government website for emergency preparedness information , those who have experienced major or catastrophic damage are more likely to have undertaken all of the provided emergency preparedness actions than those who have never experienced property damage (Figure 5.1.5). Finally, with the exception of visiting local government website for emergency preparedness information (where there is a reverse correlation) and a slight difference in having an evacuation plan, respondents who have experienced a major storm (Category 3 or higher) are more likely to have undertaken all of the provided emergency preparedness actions than those who have experienced a minor storm (tropical storm, Category 1, or Category 2), who are more likely to have undertaken all of the provided emergency preparedness actions than those who have never experienced any tropical activity (Figure 5.1.6). 443 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 35 of 265 Page Intentionally Left Blank 444 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 36 of 265 6. EMERGENCY PUBLIC INFORMATION, ACCESSIBILITY, & SERVICES 445 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 37 of 265 6 EMERGENCY PUBLIC INFORMATION, ACCESSIBILITY, & SERVICES PROVIDED Effective and informative notification to the public is vital to conveying whether to evacuate or shelter-in-place. The public must understand why they need to evacuate or shelter-in-place, how long they will need to do so, the location of transportation and evacuation points, the time required for evacuations, the availability of shelters , what they should take with them, how their pets will be accommodated, how they should secure their homes, and the security that will be provided when they a re away from their homes. This section focuses on where respondents get their disaster related information and the various services offered by the County. 6.1 Preferred Information Source Survey Question #17: Which of the following source(s) are you most likely to rely on for emergency information such as hurricane notices and updates? 446 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 38 of 265 Figure 6.1.1: 2016 Evacuation Notice and Source (All Survey Responses: Local Television n=1,890; Local Radio n=1,732; National/Cable News n=1,545; Weather Channel n=1,746; Print Media n=1,347; Internet Media n=1,532; Local Gov’t Websites n=1,544; State Gov’t Websites n=1,441; National Gov’t Websites n=1,411; Social Media n=1,389; Word of Mouth n=1,400; Miami-Dade Alerts n=1,699; Weather Radio n=1,498; Call 3-1-1 n=1,385; Other n=897) 86% 70% 60% 78% 22% 64% 55% 40% 41% 31% 32% 71% 51% 27% 9% 9% 20% 22% 14% 24% 23% 25% 27% 25% 20% 34% 20% 24% 20% 7% 5% 9% 17% 7% 51% 12% 18% 30% 32% 46% 32% 7% 23% 47% 35% 1% 1% 1% 4% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 6% 49% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Local Television Local Radio National/Cable News Weather Channel Print Media Internet Media Local Government Websites State Government Websites National Government Websites Social Media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) Word of Mouth (i.e. friends, family, co-workers) Miami-Dade Alerts Weather Radio Call 3-1-1 Other Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do not know 447 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 39 of 265 Figure 6.1.2: 2016 Evacuation Notice and Source (Randomized Mailing: Local Television n=481; Local Radio n=418; National/Cable News n=356; Weather Channel n=428; Print Media n=317; Internet Media n=357; Local Gov’t Websites n=339; State Gov’t Websites n=325; National Gov’t Websites n=322; Social Media n=326; Word of Mouth n=342; Miami-Dade Alerts n=399; Weather Radio n=352; Call 3-1-1 n=329; Other n=209) 91% 70% 59% 77% 17% 60% 37% 29% 31% 21% 33% 66% 45% 23% 7% 5% 18% 20% 14% 22% 20% 25% 26% 20% 17% 33% 21% 22% 19% 4% 4% 11% 18% 7% 54% 16% 32% 39% 42% 57% 31% 9% 27% 48% 44% 0% 1% 3% 1% 7% 4% 6% 6% 7% 6% 3% 4% 5% 10% 46% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Local Television Local Radio National/Cable News Weather Channel Print Media Internet Media Local Government Websites State Government Websites National Government Websites Social Media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) Word of Mouth (i.e. friends, family, co-workers) Miami-Dade Alerts Weather Radio Call 3-1-1 Other Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do not know 448 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 40 of 265 Figure 6.1.3: 2014 Evacuation Notice and Source (Local English-speaking Television n=1,966; Local Spanish-speaking Television n=1,585; Local English-speaking Radio n=1,773; Local Spanish-speaking Radio n=1,534; Local Haitian Creole-speaking Radio n=1,431; National News n=1,757; Print Media n=1,583; Social Media n=1,570; Local government web sites n=1,730; Word of Mouth n=1,632; Miami-Dade Alerts n=1,812; Weather Radio n=1,683; Call 3-1-1 n=1,564; Other n=1,213) 449 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 41 of 265 Figure 6.1.4: 2016 Evacuation Notice and Source (All Survey Responses): Residents 65 and older (Local Television n=319; Local Radio n=264; National/Cable News n=212; Weather Channel n=269; Print Media n=184; Internet Media n=213; Local Government Websites n=202; State Government Websites n=185; National Government Websites n=183; Social Media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) 82% 30% 65% 24% 7% 59% 32% 30% 51% 38% 65% 55% 33% 10% 11% 15% 20% 15% 7% 21% 22% 22% 28% 34% 22% 22% 19% 8% 2% 10% 6% 13% 10% 9% 18% 18% 9% 13% 5% 9% 17% 11% 1% 27% 3% 29% 43% 6% 17% 20% 5% 7% 3% 6% 16% 11% 2% 3% 3% 4% 5% 3% 5% 5% 3% 4% 3% 4% 8% 20% 1% 15% 2% 16% 28% 3% 6% 6% 3% 3% 2% 4% 6% 41% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Local English-speaking Television Local Spanish-speaking Television Local English-speaking Radio Local Spanish-speaking Radio Local Haitian Creole-speaking Radio National News (Television or Radio) Print Media (i.e. Newspaper) Social Media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) Local government web sites (i.e. miamidade.gov) Word of Mouth (i.e. friends, family, co-workers) Miami-Dade Alerts Weather Radio Call 3-1-1 Other Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Very Likely Not Likely at All Do Not Know Not Applicable 450 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 42 of 265 n=179; Word of Mouth (i.e. friends, family, co-workers) n=198; Miami-Dade Alerts n=247; Weather Radio n=213; Call 3-1-1 n=189; Other n=123) Figure 6.1.5: 2016 Evacuation Notice and Source (All Survey Responses): Residents 34 and younger (Local Television n=288; Local Radio n=276; National/Cable News n=267; Weather Channel n=276; Print Media n=259; Internet Media n=271; Local Government Websites n=269; State Government Websites n=264; National Government Websites n=263; Social Media (Facebook, 90% 72% 55% 77% 18% 50% 38% 25% 30% 14% 30% 68% 50% 25% 8% 6% 16% 20% 15% 24% 23% 27% 28% 23% 11% 33% 20% 24% 19% 5% 3% 11% 22% 7% 50% 22% 29% 41% 39% 67% 34% 8% 20% 47% 37% 2% 3% 1% 7% 5% 6% 6% 7% 8% 3% 4% 6% 10% 50% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Local Television Local Radio National/Cable News Weather Channel Print Media Internet Media Local Government Websites State Government Websites National Government Websites Social Media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) Word of Mouth (i.e. friends, family, co-workers) Miami-Dade Alerts Weather Radio Call 3-1-1 Other Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do not know 451 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 43 of 265 Twitter, etc.) n=263; Word of Mouth (i.e. friends, family, co-workers) n=264; Miami-Dade Alerts n=277; Weather Radio n=264; Call 3-1-1 n=260; Other n=186) Figure 6.1.6: 2016 Evacuation Notice and Source (All Survey Responses): Households that do not speak English (Local Television n=159; Local Radio n=135; National/Cable News n=119; Weather Channel n=137; Print Media n=101; Internet Media n=114; Local Government Websites n=116; State Government Websites n=111; National Government Websites n=107; Social Media (Facebook, 73% 59% 58% 74% 18% 78% 52% 42% 43% 49% 39% 67% 42% 25% 8% 16% 25% 25% 16% 26% 16% 27% 27% 27% 27% 37% 24% 23% 20% 10% 10% 15% 16% 9% 54% 6% 20% 31% 30% 23% 24% 8% 33% 51% 31% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 3% 51% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Local Television Local Radio National/Cable News Weather Channel Print Media Internet Media Local Government Websites State Government Websites National Government Websites Social Media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) Word of Mouth (i.e. friends, family, co-workers) Miami-Dade Alerts Weather Radio Call 3-1-1 Other Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do not know 452 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 44 of 265 Twitter, etc.) n=103; Word of Mouth (i.e. friends, family, co-workers) n=108; Miami-Dade Alerts n=142; Weather Radio n=113; Call 3-1-1 n=109; Other n=70) 87% 74% 63% 72% 22% 58% 57% 49% 46% 39% 46% 75% 52% 42% 13% 6% 13% 13% 17% 30% 18% 16% 17% 19% 18% 26% 12% 19% 21% 16% 4% 9% 17% 7% 36% 15% 18% 25% 26% 34% 22% 8% 20% 29% 29% 3% 4% 7% 4% 13% 9% 9% 9% 9% 9% 6% 6% 9% 7% 43% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Local Television Local Radio National/Cable News Weather Channel Print Media Internet Media Local Government Websites State Government Websites National Government Websites Social Media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) Word of Mouth (i.e. friends, family, co-workers) Miami-Dade Alerts Weather Radio Call 3-1-1 Other Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do not know 453 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 45 of 265  Note: Nearly all respondents indicated they will or likely will use multiple resources to gather information on hurricane evacuation and notices. There are a myriad of combinations of tools that respondents use, but on average, a respondent is likely to use 8.5 resources to stay informed on emergency information such as hurricane notices and updates. The following table shows the order of resources respondents indicated they would or likely would use. Order Resource Number of Respondents 1 Local Television 1,797 2 Weather Channel 1,610 3 Local Radio 1,556 4 Miami-Dade Alerts 1,556 5 Internet Media 1,322 6 National/Cable News 1,270 7 Local Government Websites 1,238 8 Weather Radio 1,119 9 State Government Websites 970 10 National Government Websites 923 11 Word of Mouth (i.e. friends, family, co-workers) 922 12 Social Media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) 710 13 Call 3-1-1 641 14 Print Media 615 15 Other 144 Comparative Analysis: National Trends and Findings  Traditionally, television has been the most commonly used source to seek hurricane forecasts and tracks; however, social media is rapidly replacing this (Bowser and Cutter, 2015).  Studies indicate the public does not rely on a single official source of warning information and has access to multiple sources of information, some of which may be unreliable or not supported by valid models or detection systems (Drabek, 1969; Perry and Lindell, 1991).  Drabek (1969) suggests the high level of reliance on the news media appears to be due to people’s desire to confirm the information they initially received in a warning message from one source by c ontacting a different source.  Effective evacuations incorporate specific, targeted warnings issued through a variety of formats, in a manner that residents can understand and internalize (Cutter and Smith, 2009). 454 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 46 of 265 6.2 Information Accessibility Survey Question #6: Please indicate what type of device(s) you use to access the internet. Select ALL that apply. Figure 6.2.1: 2016 Device Used to Access Internet (All Survey Responses: n= 1,936) Figure 6.2.2: 2016 Device Used to Access Internet (Randomized Mailing n= 492) 89% 58% 59% 92% 7% 2% 1% 1% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Computer/laptop at home Computer/laptop at work/office iPad/tablet Cell phone Public computer (i.e. library) I do not have access to the Internet Other (please specify) Not applicable 85% 36% 55% 86% 5% 4% 1% 2% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Computer/laptop at home Computer/laptop at work/office iPad/tablet Cell phone Public computer (i.e. library) I do not have access to the Internet Other (please specify) Not applicable 455 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 47 of 265 Figure 6.2.3: 2016 Device Used to Access Internet (All Survey Responses): Comparison by Age Group (34 Years Old or Younger n=290; 35 – 64 Years Old n= 1,273; 65 Years Old and Above n=327) Open-ended Response Summary: There were few “other” options for this response. Of those, a few indicated they rely on a type of TV or p hone to access the internet. Others rely on a portable WiFi device (such as an aircard or MiFi device), or a 96% 61% 65% 97% 10% 0% 0% 0% 90% 67% 63% 94% 7% 1% 1% 0% 78% 25% 40% 77% 4% 7% 2% 3% 0%20%40%60%80%100%120% Computer/laptop at home Computer/laptop at work/office iPad/tablet Cell phone Public computer (i.e. library) I do not have access to the Internet Other (please specify) Not applicable 34 Years Old or Younger 35 – 64 Years Old 65 Years Old and Above 456 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 48 of 265 community computer. Finally, a few respondents indicated they do not access the internet. Survey Question #7: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? During times of emergency, information is provided in a language or format I can understand. Figure 6.2.4: 2016 Language (All Survey Responses: n= 1,926) Insights into: Respondents who Disagree There were 20 respondents who indicated that they either “Disagree” (6 respondents) or “Strongly Disagree” (14 respondents) that during times of emergency, information is provided in a language or format they can understand. Of these respondents: Emergency Preparations Just above 15% of respondents have signed up for Miami-Dade Alerts or visited local government websites for emergency preparedness information. How can Miami-Dade County better assist you? Nine respondents left open ended responses on how the county could better assist them. These responses include:  Clear english would help with communication.  Hola: De la misma manera en que llegan propagandas de los mercados y tiendas podrian hacer que nos llegara mas informacion, muchas personas son de una edad abanzada y no tienen acseso a internet o medios para informarse correctamente y en ocaciones no tienen la posibilidad de crear las condiciones correctas, quizas podrian ayudar mas al respecto. Gracias o Translation: “Hello: In the same way that advertisements from the 48% 43% 5% 0% 1% 3% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree Do Not Know 457 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 49 of 265 markets and shops arrive, we can get more information, many people are of an old age and do not have access to the Internet or the means to inform themselves correctly and sometimes they do not have the possibility to Create the right conditions, maybe they could help more about it. Thank you”  Move faster when there is a disaster, give people what they need such as materials  Provide preparedness materials in my language - Bulgarian, provide disaster supply kit and water.  Provide specifications for specific locations (neighborhoods) storm surge planning map difficult to interpret (too small)  Simple list of "who to call" after a disaster. Examples - tree removal, fire clean- up, flood clean-up, down lines  Text messages and a disaster alert app - perhaps they already have such things.  provide where are shelters by zip code  public service announcements in transportation such as personal vehicles or automatic alerts such as AMBER alerts Figure 6.2.5: Sources for Information of Respondents who Disagree or Strongly Disagree that Emergency Information is Provided in a Language or Format They Can Understand (Loca l Television n=20; Local Radio n=19; National/Cable News n=16; Weather Channel n=19; Print Media n=15; Internet Media n=13; Local Government Websites n=15; State Government Websites n=14; National Government Websites n=13; Social Media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) n=14; Word of Mouth (i.e. friends, family, co-workers) n=14; Miami-Dade Alerts n=16; Weather Radio n=15; Call 3-1-1 n=15; Other n=10) 458 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 50 of 265 Language Of this group, 77.8% speak English and 50% speak Spanish. One respondent speaks French, one speaks Bulgarian, one speaks Dutch, and one speaks an Indian dialect. Education & Income Of this group, 16% completed some high school, 11% completed some college, 26% graduated college, 31% completed post graduate school, and 16% indicated this question was not applicable. The group’s income levels were also widely varied: 28% earned less than $25,000 annually and 22% earned more than $100,000 annually. Figure 6.2.6: 2016 Language (Randomized Mailing: n= 490) 60% 63% 44% 68% 27% 62% 40% 36% 38% 36% 29% 69% 53% 27% 20% 25% 26% 25% 16% 20% 15% 27% 29% 31% 21% 29% 13% 20% 20% 20% 10% 5% 25% 11% 47% 15% 27% 29% 23% 36% 36% 13% 20% 40% 40% 5% 5% 6% 5% 7% 8% 7% 7% 8% 7% 7% 6% 7% 13% 20% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Local Television Local Radio National/Cable News Weather Channel Print Media Internet Media Local Government Websites State Government Websites National Government Websites Social Media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) Word of Mouth (i.e. friends, family, co-workers) Miami-Dade Alerts Weather Radio Call 3-1-1 Other Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do not know 459 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 51 of 265 35% 51% 7% 1% 1% 6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree Do Not Know 460 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 52 of 265 Figure 6.2.7: 2014 Language (n= 2,018) Figure 6.2.8: 2016 Language (All Survey Responses): Households that do not Speak English (n=261) 44% 43% 8% 1% 1% 3% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree Do Not Know 43% 40% 9% 1% 3% 4% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree Do Not Know 461 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 53 of 265 Comparative Analysis: National Trends and Findings  Increasing ethnic diversity has created barriers to communication with minority groups. Some researchers indicate that membership in a minority group typically isolates a person from information and decreases the likelihood of responding to a warning (Perr y et al., 1982, Gladwin and Peacock, 1997).  Other studies demonstrate that ethnicity does not have a significant effect on evacuation when perceived risk has the greatest influence (Perry and Lindell, 1991).  Language - the inability to understand the warning message - may also be a factor explaining why culturally isolated groups fail to understand a warning. The high number of deaths of Hispanics in the Saragosa, TX tornado, was attributed to a failure to provide a good translation of the warning into Spanish (Aquirre et al., 1991).  Minorities are less exposed to disaster warnings and evacuation information. Instead, they are more likely to rely on informal sources. For example, Spanish-speaking Latino homeowners are more likely to report friends and family members as important sources of disaster mitigation information (Lindell & Perry, 1992).  Lindell and Perry (1992) indicate, that translations should be professionally executed to avoid complications arising from dialect variations within the same language group. 462 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 54 of 265 Survey Question #7: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? I can easily obtain emergency information in times of emergency. Figure 6.2.9: 2016 Ease of Obtaining Information (All Survey Responses: n= 1,922) Insights into: Respondents who Disagree There were 40 respondents who indicated that they either “Disagree” (25 respondents) or “Strongly Disagree” (15 respondents) that they can easily obtain emergency information in times of emergency. Of these respondents: Emergency Preparations Of this group, 21% have signed up for Miami-Dade Alerts and 28% have visited local government websites for emergency preparedness information. How can Miami-Dade County better assist you? Sixteen respondents left ideas on how the county could better assist them. Ideas include:  Alternative for energy shortage should be provided.  Be able to transfer wheelchair people to another place when light is gone and they have to keep inside of the apartment for a whole month while light service is restored  Better awareness of hurricane preparedness at one site that is easy to access from computer or cellphone  Food and water  Have a live person answer the telephone and respond to specific questions with specific information  I don't know how I will get updates from M-DC or alerts on my phone or social 35% 43% 12% 1% 1% 7% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree Do Not Know 463 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 55 of 265 media - even if I don't follow or sign up, there should be a way to reach me  Instead of waiting for a disaster to take place then providing assistance, maybe the county could supply low income households certain items ahead of an emergency situation.  Move faster when there is a disaster, give people what they need such as materials  Provide preparedness materials in my language - Bulgarian, provide disaster supply kit and water.  Rectify power outages in a more timely manner  Simple list of "who to call" after a disaster. Examples - tree removal, fire clean- up, flood clean-up, down lines  Text messages and a disaster alert app - perhaps they already have such things.  When the Governor declares a state of emergency, the Mayor of MDC should produce a statement on this website. Your employees and facilities need to know you're thinking about them. They need your guidance and leadership and I do not see one single mention of Hurricane Matthew on this site. It is a public neglect that needs to be corrected. We are looking to you for leadership and yes, breast cancer and pet adoption is important but you are not preparing your county for the potential of a major hurricane and it is a blaring and ridiculous failure.  help out after the evacuation and curve traffic  website, app Language In this group, 84% speak English, 55% speak Spanish and 3% speak Haitian Creole. Just over 5% speak French, 1 respondent speaks Bulgarian, 1 speaks Dutch and 1 speaks Portuguese. Education & Income In this group, 5% completed some high school, 5% are high school graduates, 18% completed some college, 39% are college graduates, and 23% completed post graduate work. This group also had a wide spread of income levels: 11% earned less than $15,000 annually, 8% earned $15,000 to $24,999, 11% earned $25,000 to $39,999, 22% earned $40,000 to $79,999, 16% earned $80,000 to $99,999, and 16% earned over $100,000. Internet & Sources of Information for Emergency Information Only 5% of this group does not have access to the internet. 74% access the internet on a computer or laptop at their home, 42% use a computer or laptop at work, 47% use an iPad or tablet, and 84% use a cell phone. Figure 6.2.10: Sources for Information of Respondents who Disagree or Strongly Disagree that They can Easily Obtain Information During an Emergency (Local Television n=39; Local Radio n=33; National/Cable News n=33; Weather Channel n=36; Print Media n=30; Internet Media n=32; 464 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 56 of 265 Local Government Websites n=31; State Government Websites n=28; National Government Websites n=29; Social Media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) n=31; Word of Mouth (i.e. friends, family, co-workers) n=30; Miami-Dade Alerts n=31; Weather Radio n=30; Call 3-1-1 n=30; Other n=18) 72% 48% 42% 61% 10% 53% 23% 18% 28% 29% 30% 42% 33% 23% 6% 15% 24% 27% 17% 20% 28% 39% 25% 21% 16% 20% 23% 23% 13% 0% 10% 21% 24% 14% 60% 13% 32% 50% 45% 48% 43% 26% 37% 57% 44% 3% 6% 6% 8% 10% 6% 6% 7% 7% 6% 7% 10% 7% 7% 50% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Local Television Local Radio National/Cable News Weather Channel Print Media Internet Media Local Government Websites State Government Websites National Government Websites Social Media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) Word of Mouth (i.e. friends, family, co-workers) Miami-Dade Alerts Weather Radio Call 3-1-1 Other Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do not know 465 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 57 of 265 Figure 6.2.11: 2016 Ease of Obtaining Information (Randomized Mailing n= 490) Figure 6.2.12: 2014 Ease of Obtaining Information (n=2,018) 23% 48% 16% 2% 1% 10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree Do Not Know 35% 44% 14% 2% 1% 4% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree Do Not Know 466 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 58 of 265 Figure 6.2.13: 2016 Ease of Obtaining Information (All Survey Responses): Households that do not Speak English (n=162) 35% 42% 11% 1% 4% 7% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree Do Not Know 467 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 59 of 265 Survey Question #7: Please indicate how Miami-Dade County can better assist you in preparing for emergencies and disasters (example: provide preparedness materials in my language). The following is a summary of the open-ended responses that offer additional insight to the needs of residents (also see Appendix A for all open-ended responses): Open-ended Response Summary: Many people offered suggestions on how the County could better assist in preparing for emergencies and disasters. In general, an overarching theme was the desire for more advertisement and education regarding what services are available from the County. Thirty-eight percent (38%) of all requests regarded additional information (much of which is already available) and 7% requested alerts (which are also available). Materials were requested in all different forms, including physical and electronic pamphlets and brochures; door-to-door visits and phone calls; text and email alerts; information on television, the radio and the internet; and community preparedness events. Many requested materials in their language; the most requested languages were English and Spanish, but there was at least one request for Haitian-Creole, Arabic, Bulgarian, and Turkish materials. Many people requested more timely and frequent communication across various methods. The charts below display the demographic information for the most requested forms of materials (to be included on these charts, at least 10 people must have requested the method). Eight percent (8%) did not have any recommendations or did not know what services were available. Figure 6.2.14: Materials Request by Ethnicity (Black – African American n=12; Black – Hispanic n=8; Black – Other (i.e. Haitian, Other West Indies) n=10; White – Non Hispanic n=38; White – Hispanic n=87; Far East Asian (i.e. Chinese, Korean) n=0; South Asian (i.e. Indian, Pakistani) n=0; Pacific Islander n=0; American Indian or Alaska Native n=1; Other (please specify) n=9) 468 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 60 of 265 Figure 6.2.15: Materials Request by Language Spoken at Home (Email n=12; In Person/Phone n=14; Local News n=32; Printer Materials n=56; Text Alerts n=14; Workshops/Classes n=24) Figure 6.2.16: Materials Request by Education (Some high school n=2; High school graduate n=6; Some college n=36; College graduate n=60; Post graduate n=46) 8% 10% 8% 6% 33% 8% 38% 10% 5% 10% 11% 8% 25% 30% 29% 20% 11% 50% 25% 30% 32% 37% 100% 33% 17% 8% 9% 11% 8% 13% 20% 18% 18% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Black – African American Black – Hispanic Black – Other (i.e. Haitian, Other West Indies) White – Non Hispanic White – Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native Other (please specify) Email In Person or Phone Local News Printed Materials Text Alerts Workshops Education 100% 93% 91% 88% 93% 100% 50% 86% 47% 70% 57% 63% 7% 6% 7% 4% 7% 6% 14% 4% 9% 7% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Email Materials In Person/Phone Local News Printed Materials Text Alerts Workshops/Classes English Spanish Haitian Creole French Other 469 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 61 of 265 33% 8% 5% 9% 17% 14% 12% 2% 100% 17% 25% 10% 28% 33% 36% 45% 28% 6% 8% 15% 11% 20% 17% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Some high school High school graduate Some college College graduate Post graduate Email In Person or Phone Local News Printed Materials Text Alerts Workshops Education 470 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 62 of 265 Figure 6.2.17: Materials Request by Age (20-24 n=7; 25-34 n=23; 35-49 n=46; 50-64 n=62; 65-74 n=7; 75-79 n=2; 80 or older n=3) Figure 6.2.18: Materials Request by Income (Email n=12; In Person/Phone n=14; Local News n=32; Printer Materials n=56; Text Alerts n=14; Workshops/Classes n=24) Many specified concerns about flooding (sunny day, normal storm, and hurricane flooding) and requested more information on evacuation and shelters. There were requests for assistance with individual home needs (food, water, sandbags, etc.) and with personal emergency plans, especially for those with p ets. Many indicated that they did not know what shelters were pet friendly, or that there were not enough pet friendly shelter options. There were requests for additional access and functional needs considerations, but also praise for the current work that is being done for this community. There were a few requests for specific community improvements (including a number of power concerns) and issues specific to County employees. However, in addition to the many ideas on how Miami-Dade County government could improve, many respondents also stated that they are very pleased with the current efforts in place and commended the County. 4% 7% 13% 17% 7% 10% 17% 13% 27% 29% 100% 43% 48% 37% 29% 57% 100% 14% 15% 10% 43% 13% 22% 11% 14% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% 20-24 25-34 35-49 50-64 65-74 75-79 80 or older Email In Person or Phone Local News Printed Materials Text Alerts Workshops Education 3% 4% 7% 3% 9% 4% 8% 6% 16% 14% 4% 33% 50% 38% 32% 29% 33% 17% 14% 22% 11% 36% 8% 25% 14% 25% 20% 21% 38% 17% 4% 8% 7% 3% 4% 4% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Email Materials In Person/Phone Local News Printed Materials Text Alerts Workshops/Classes $14,999 or less $15,000 to $24,999 $25,000 to $39,999 $40,000 to $79,999 $80,000 to $99,999 $100,000 or more Do not know Not applicable 471 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 63 of 265 6.3 Disaster Services Survey Question #7: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Miami-Dade County is providing the services necessary to prepare me for a disaster. Figure 6.3.1: 2016 Services Provided (All Survey Responses: n= 1,939) Insights into: Respondents who Disagree There were 64 respondents who indicated that they either “Disagree” (45 respondents) or “Strongly Disagree” (19 respondents) that Miami-Dade County is providing the services necessary to prepare them for a disaster. Of these respondents: Emergency Preparations 21% of respondents have signed up for Miami-Dade Alerts and 23% have visited local government websites for emergency preparedness information. How can Miami-Dade County better assist you? Thirty-one respondents left open ended responses on how the county could better assist them. These responses include:  (81 yr old mother cannot be high up) My complex floods enormously just during rain, I was flooded out of Apt #131 in 2013 lost everything, Miami Dade must make law for all complexes, all apartments on 1st floor needs to have sandbags available in case of flooding, at least, can protect until you get assistance.  Do a fair where people can buy basic products that they will need in an 31% 45% 14% 2% 1% 7% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree Do Not Know 472 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 64 of 265 emergency with good prices. Take the opportunity to explain more about disasters and what you really need in this situation  Food and water  Give resident (homeowners) enough sand bags in case of flood emergency. Water, food is in emergency kit.  Have Law Enforcement Officers respond to inform the communities, in person or deliver flyers, door hangers, etc.  Have a live person answer the telephone and respond to specific questions with specific information  Help access supplies and transportation  I would like to receive a hurricane preparedness guide at home by mail. All households should receive one. All text messages sent during a storm should provide a link to a resources website. We need to understand in case of communications interruptions (no internet access, no phone access, etc...) what are the choices available? County employees could be used as a source to distribute hurricane guides to the community if we only shared a few copies to our immediate relatives...... so perhaps the first distribution of such resources guide can start with our own County employees (by email as downloadable PDF as well as printed)  Improve pre-disaster prep. Partner with organizations (schools, HOAs, Service groups) to heighten awareness. Prep for disaster readiness/response beyond weather events.  Information needs to be better disseminated throughout the communities, especially low-income, minority ones, and in English, Spanish, and Haitian Creole, at least.  Instead of waiting for a disaster to take place then providing assistance, maybe the county could supply low income households certain items ahead of an emergency situation.  Mail out to the residence saying what to do, How to prepare and where to go to get the items needed to become storm ready or emergency ready. The mail out should include coupons to those who can't afford it.  Managing the traffic and response time in a more timely manner  Move faster when there is a disaster, give people what they need such as materials  Provide materials with routes, contact information  Provide necessities PRIOR to the hurricane  Provide the desired form of communication (US mail, email, text messages, fb) to its residents regarding preparedness. In other words, ask me my preferred communication to receive regular updates and tips, then send. Pre/during/post emergencies.  Sending evacuation routes, shelters information, family tips  Simple list of "who to call" after a disaster. Examples - tree removal, fire clean- up, flood clean-up, down lines  Spanish  Text messages and a disaster alert app - perhaps they already have such 473 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 65 of 265 things.  The amount of time allowable for residents to prepare their homes prior to an event. Have been caught in previous tropical storms in the car on the way home because the call was made too late. Puts residents in danger.  Use the same kiosk for the transit schedules to also post emergency preparedness info.  When the Governor declares a state of emergency, the Mayor of MDC should produce a statement on this website. Your employees and facilities need to know you're thinking about them. They need your guidance and leadership and I do not see one single mention of Hurricane Matthew on this site. It is a public neglect that needs to be corrected. We are looking to you for leadership and yes, breast cancer and pet adoption is important but you are not preparing your county for the potential of a major hurricane and it is a blaring and ridiculous failure.  When u move into this county a book should accompany ur lease stating rainfall amounts and best estimate of flooding from just extensive rainfall situations to possible Hurricane flooding. The Keys gate group supplied little to no info except about insurance. And I am from the Midwest I lived at confluence of Mississippi & Missouri River and everyone knew flood plain just by insurance companies to pamphlets from the state and the Core of Engineers. Here u can't drive down a road and tell it floods in Missouri u could see debri in trees water lines on trees and look at info provided and know what to watch for. Not sure what to do here only been here 3 months. Wife's RN with VA so she can't just evacuate she has job liabilities.  available/ better/ home insurance-affordable  don't know how to sign up for alerts, assisting residents who can’t afford with affordable shutters, providing assistance with rides, making hurricane supplies tax deductible  evacuation plan for South Florida  visiting areas to educate people  website, app 474 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 66 of 265 Figure 6.3.2: Sources for Information of Respondents who Disagree or Strongly Disagree that Miami-Dade County is Providing the Service Necessary to Prepare them for a Disaster (Local Television n=62; Local Radio n=57; National/Cable News n=50; Weather Channel n=56; Print Media n=48; Internet Media n=52; Local Government Websites n=51; State Government Websites n=50; National Government Websites n=49; Social Media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) n=50; Word of Mouth (i.e. friends, family, co-workers) n=49; Miami-Dade Alerts n=51; Weather Radio n=52; Call 3-1-1 n=50; Other n=36) Language Of this group, 90.3% speak English and 62.9% speak Spanish. Two respondents speak French, two speak Portuguese and one speaks Dutch. Education & Income Of this group, 5% completed some high school, 14% graduated high school, 13% completed some college, 41% graduated college, 22% completed post graduate school, and 5% indicated this question was not applicable or did not know. 11% of this group earned less than $25,000 annually, 15% earned $25,000 to $39,999, 31% earned $40,000 to $79,999, 19% earned $80,000 to $99,999 and 16% earned $100,000 or more. 79% 60% 37% 58% 10% 52% 27% 26% 27% 26% 24% 48% 37% 16% 2% 11% 21% 16% 15% 15% 18% 26% 18% 15% 18% 21% 16% 23% 19% 3% 8% 10% 26% 15% 50% 13% 27% 35% 35% 34% 29% 15% 23% 40% 29% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 5% 3% 2% 5% 24% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Local Television Local Radio National/Cable News Weather Channel Print Media Internet Media Local Government Websites State Government Websites National Government Websites Social Media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) Word of Mouth (i.e. friends, family, co-workers) Miami-Dade Alerts Weather Radio Call 3-1-1 Other Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do not know 475 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 67 of 265 Figure 6.3.3: 2016 Services Provided (Randomized Mailing: n= 493) Figure 6.3.4: 2014 Services Provided (n=2,020) 17% 45% 21% 3% 2% 12% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree Do Not Know 27% 45% 19% 2% 1% 5% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree Do Not Know 476 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 68 of 265 Survey Question #7: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Miami-Dade County is prepared to protect, respond and recover from a disaster in my community. Figure 6.3.5: 2016 Miami-Dade is Prepared to Protect, Respond, and Recover from a Disaster (All Survey Responses: n= 1,926) Figure 6.3.6: 2016 Miami-Dade is Prepared to Protect, Respond, and Recover from a Disaster (Randomized Mailing: n= 492) 29% 43% 16% 2% 1% 9% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree Do Not Know 16% 44% 21% 2% 1% 15% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree Do Not Know 477 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 69 of 265 Insights into: Respondents who Disagree There were 58 respondents who indicated that they either “Disagree” (41 respondents) or “Strongly Disagree” (17 respondents) that Miami-Dade County is prepared to protect, respond, and recover from a disaster. Of these respondents: Emergency Preparations 26% of respondents have signed up for Miami-Dade Alerts and 19% have visited local government websites for emergency preparedness information. How can Miami-Dade County better assist you? No respondents left suggestions on how Miami-Dade County could better assist them in preparing for emergencies and disasters. Figure 6.3.7: Sources for Information of Respondents who Disagree or Strongly Disagree that Miami-Dade County is Providing the Services Necessary to Prepare them for a Disaster (Local Television n=57; Local Radio n=51; National/Cable News n=43; Weather Channel n=55; Print Media n=41; Internet Media n=44; Local Government Websites n=45; State Government Websites n=43; National Government Websites n=43; Social Media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) n=44; Word of Mouth (i.e. friends, family, co-workers) n=44; Miami-Dade Alerts n=48; Weather Radio n=45; Call 3-1-1 n=41; Other n=31) Language Of this group, 96% speak English, 57% speak Spanish, 4% speak Haitian Creole and 7% speak French. 81% 67% 51% 80% 22% 61% 44% 40% 35% 23% 27% 65% 58% 27% 3% 12% 22% 19% 7% 15% 23% 27% 19% 21% 20% 27% 13% 13% 20% 6% 5% 10% 28% 9% 61% 14% 27% 40% 42% 52% 43% 19% 27% 49% 42% 2% 2% 2% 4% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 5% 2% 4% 2% 5% 48% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Local Television Local Radio National/Cable News Weather Channel Print Media Internet Media Local Government Websites State Government Websites National Government Websites Social Media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) Word of Mouth (i.e. friends, family, co-workers) Miami-Dade Alerts Weather Radio Call 3-1-1 Other Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do not know 478 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 70 of 265 Education & Income Of this group, 2% completed some high school, 12% graduated high school, 19% completed some college, 37% graduated college, 23% completed post g raduate school, and 7% indicated this question was not applicable. 9% of this group earned less than $25,000 annually, 11% earned $25,000 to $39,999, 33% earned $40,000 to $79,999, 11% earned $80,000 to $99,999 and 25% earned $100,000 or more. 6.4 Observations & Considerations Although local television was the highest rated source respondents selected as “very likely” to rely on for evacuation notices and updates (86% rated as “very likely” and 9% as “somewhat likely), respondents indicated that they would also use other sources as well (Figure 6.1.1). Over 70% of respondents indicated that they would be “very likely” to use local radio (70%), the Weather Channel (78%) and Miami -Dade Alerts (71%). Respondents were least likely to use print media (51% a re “not likely” to use it), followed by 3-1-1 (47%) and social media (46%). However, it should be noted that younger residents are more likely to use social media than older residents. According to 2017 PEW research, 86% of U.S. adults between the ages of 18 and 29, 80% of U.S. adults between the ages of 30 and 49, 64% of U.S. adults between the ages of 50 and 64, and 34% of U.S. adults above age 65 use at least one social media site. This difference can be seen between Figure 6.1.4 Evacuation Notice Source for Residents 65 and older and Figure 6.1.5 Evacuation Notice Source for Residents 34 and younger; only 14% of residents 65 and older would be “very likely” to rely on social media and 67% of them would be “not likely” to rely on social media. Nearly 40% of residents 34 and younger would be “very likely” to rely on social media and only 23% would be “not likely” to rely on social media. Additional differences in evacuation notice sources between younger and older county residents is an increased use of local television and local radio among older residents and an increased use of internet media and websites among younger county residents. Neither group plans to rely heavily on print media and both groups are relatively likely to use Miami-Dade Alerts (only 8% of both age groups were “not likely” to use Miami-Dade Alerts). Among households that do not speak English, 87% indicated they are “very likely” to rely on local television, 75% are “very likely” to use Miami -Dade Alerts, 74% are “very likely” to use local radio, and 72% are “very likely” to use the Weather Channel. There is a sizable increase in “very likely” reliance on word -of-mouth from 32% among all survey respondents to 46% among non-English speaking households and an increase in “very likely” to call 3-1-1 from 27% among all survey respondents to 42% among non -English speaking households (Figure 6.1.6). In keeping with the research, respondents used multiple sources to confirm information; respondents selected an average of 8.5 resources they were “very likely” or “somewhat likely” to use. 479 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 71 of 265 The most common device used to access the internet was the cell phone (92%) followed closely by a computer or laptop at home (89%) (Figure 6.2.1). There is a general trend in younger respondents to be more likely to use all of the presented internet access methods than older respondents (with the exception of the 35 to 64 year old group, which is slightly more likely to use a work laptop or computer than those 34 years old or younger) (Figure 6.2.3). Miami-Dade County should continue to ensure that all releases on the website or that link back to the website are viewable in both computer and mobile formats. Overwhelmingly respondents indicated that during times of emergency, information is provided in a language or format they can understand (Figure 6.2.4). One percent (1%) of respondents indicated that they disagreed or strongly disagreed with that statement. Of those respondents, just above 15% have used resources provided by Miami -Dade County to distribute information (Miami-Dade Alerts & local government website). This group tends to rely less on local television and radio than the general public (60% are “very likely” to rely on local television & 63% are “very likely” to rely on the local radio). Their most likely source to rely on for emergency information is Miami -Dade Alerts (69% rated as “very likely”) (Figure 6.2.5). Among households that do not speak English, 4% either disagreed or strongly disagreed that during times of emergency information is provided in a language or format they can understand, and 9% neither agreed nor disagreed (Figure 6.2.8). Nearly 80% of respondents strongly agreed or agreed that they can easily obtain emergency information during an emergency while 2% either disagreed or st rongly disagreed (Figure 6.2.9). Of those who did not agree that they can easily obtain emergency information, just over 20% have signed up for Miami -Dade Alerts and 28% have visited local government websites for emergency preparedness information. This group has slightly less internet access than the general public; only 84% access the internet on their cell phone, 74% on a home laptop or computer, 42% on a work laptop or computer and 47% on a tablet. Five percent (5%) of this group does not have access to the internet. This groups strongest source for information is local television (72% “very likely” to use this source) followed by the Weather Channel (61% “very likely”) and internet media (53% “very likely”). This group is less likely to use all of the e mergency information sources presented than the overall respondent group (this group has higher “not likely” ratings on every source of information compared to the overall respondent group) (Figure 6.2.10). Among households that do not speak English, 5% either disagreed or strongly disagreed that they can easily obtain emergency information during an emergency and 11% neither disagreed nor agreed (Figure 6.2.13). When asked how Miami-Dade County could better assist the respondent in preparing for emergencies and disasters, many ideas were presented but the majority focused on more preparedness materials and education. Printed materials were most highly requested among the Black – African American, White – Non Hispanic, White – 480 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 72 of 265 Hispanic and American Indian/Alaska Native respondents (Figure 6.2.14). The Black – Hispanic respondents most wanted to see additional in person or phone outreach. The Black – Other (i.e. Haitian, Other West Indies) respondents equally most wanted to see more information on the local news and in printed materials, while those who indicated their ethnicity was “Other” most wanted to receive materials via email and print. Nearly all respondents who requested additional materials or education speak English. Eighty six percent (86%) of those who wanted more in person or phone outreach also speak Spanish. Those who speak Haitian Creole most wanted to see additional in person or phone outreach and printed materials (Figure 6.2.15). The only source respondents with less than a high school di ploma requested was additional information on local news. High school graduates wanted to see more emails and printed materials. Those with some college and college degrees wanted to see more printed materials and those with a post graduate education wante d to see more information on the local news and in printed materials (Figure 6.2.16). Those ages 20 to 24 most requested additional printed materials or workshops/education. Those ages 25 to 74 most wanted additional printed materials. Those ages 75-79 (2 respondents) requested additional printed materials and those ages 80 or older (3 respondents) wanted to see more on the local news (Figure 6.2.17). Local news and printed materials were requested by the largest variance of income, and included respondents from all income groups. Email materials were only requested by respondents whose households make over $25,000 annually. Those whose households make over $40,000 requested every information/education source, while those who make between $15,000 and $24,999 only requested in person or phone outreach, local news, printed materials, and workshops/classes and those whose households make less than $14,999 annually only requested more information on the lo cal news and printed materials (Figure 6.2.18). Nearly 80% of respondents strongly agreed or agreed that Miami-Dade County is providing the services necessary to prepare them for a disaster (Figure 6.3.1). Of the 3% that disagree or strongly disagree with this statement, just over 20% have signed up for Miami-Dade Alerts or visited local government websites for emergency information. This group provided thirty one open-ended answers on how the county could better assist them and included everything from flooding assistance to providing emergency supplies and additional printed materials. The majority of this group would use local television for emergency alerts (79% very likely). This group is not likely to use printed materials or call 3-1-1 (Figure 6.3.2). Just over 72% of respondents strongly agreed or agreed that Miami-Dade County is prepared to protect, respond, and recovery from a disaster (Figure 6.3.5). Three percent (3%) disagreed or strongly disagreed with that statement. Twenty-six percent (26%) of those who disagreed or strongly disagreed have signed up for Miami-Dade Alerts and less than 20% have visited local government websites for emergency preparedness 481 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 73 of 265 information. This group is likely to rely on local television and the Weather Channel for emergency information, but not likely to rely on print media or call 3-1-1. Less than half will rely on social media (Figure 6.3.7). 482 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 74 of 265 Page Intentionally Left Blank 483 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 75 of 265 7. EVACUATION 484 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 76 of 265 7 EVACUATION Evacuation is a process by which people are moved from a place where there is immediate or anticipated danger to a place of safety, offered appropriate temporary shelter facilities, and when the threat to safety is gone, enabled to return to their normal activities, or to make suitable alternative arrangements. A large-scale evacuation is a complex, multi-jurisdictional effort that requires coordination between many disciplines, agencies, and organizations. The section addresses key findings as it relates to understanding evacuee behavior, experience, perceptions, and compliance. 7.1 Evacuation Experience Survey Question #14: While residing in Miami-Dade County, have you ever evacuated your place of residence for the hazards listed below? Please answer for EACH hazard, and select ALL that apply. Note: It is possible you have evacuated more than once for some of the hazards listed below. If you have, please select all hazards that apply and indicate the different locations you may have evacuated to. Figure 7.1.1: 2016 Previous Evacuation (All Survey Responses: Hurricane n=1,916; Wildfire n=1,840; Flood n=1,847; HazMat n=1,830) 17% 4% 5% 3% 6% 1% 1% 1% 75% 91% 91% 92% 1% 4% 2% 4% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Hurricane Wildfire Flood (example: rainstorm)Hazardous Materials Incident (example: chemical release) Yes, evacuated but stayed in Miami-Dade County Yes, evacuated but went someplace outside of Miami-Dade County No, I have never evacuated Do Not Know 485 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 77 of 265 Figure 7.1.2: 2016 Previous Evacuation (Randomized Mailing: Hurricane n=483; Wildfire n=458; Flood n=462; HazMat n=457) Figure 7.1.3: 2014 Previous Evacuation (Hurricane n=2,064; Wildfire n=2,026; Flood n=2,028; Hazardous Materials Incident n=2,006; Radiological Incident n=3) 17% 3% 3% 2% 7% 1% 1% 75% 92% 94% 93% 4% 2% 5% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Hurricane Wildfire Flood (example: rainstorm)Hazardous Materials Incident (example: chemical release) Yes, evacuated but stayed in Miami-Dade County Yes, evacuated but went someplace outside of Miami-Dade County No, I have never evacuated Do Not Know 21% 5% 7% 4% 10% 5% 6% 4% 63% 66% 73% 67% 100% 1% 2% 1% 2% 5% 22% 13% 22% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Hurricane Wildfire Flood (example: rainstorm) Hazardous Materials Incident (example: Chemical release) Radiological Incident (example: Nuclear Power Plant) Yes, evacuated but stayed in Miami-Dade County Yes, evacuated but went someplace outside of Miami-Dade County No, I have never evacuated Do Not Know Not Applicable 486 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 78 of 265 Comparative Analysis: National Trends and Findings  Experiencing a disaster or a close call with an event often shapes people's response to future events; however, it does not do so in a predictable or systematic way. Direct hazard experience does not affect interpretation of warning information, decision processes, behavior, or information seeking (Lindell and Perry, 2004). Hurricane Kate led to an evacuation of the Tampa Bay area about 4 months after Hurricane Elena had prompted an unnecessary evacuation of the same area. Baker (1987) found that evacuation rates in the Tampa Bay area for Hurricane Kate were similar to that for Elena, despite the ea rlier false alarm. Others have suggested that long-term residents of coastal areas, who experienced minor hurricanes without severe damages, become complacent, and are less likely to evacuate in subsequent events (Windham et al., 1977). Others have suggested previous experience had a mixed effect on warning response (Sorensen, 2000). In some cases, it deters response and in others it increases response. “Many studies acknowledge the salience of hurricane experience, but whether it influences evacuation responses positively or negatively is unclear” (Bowser and Cutter, 2015). 487 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 79 of 265 Survey Question #14a: If you answered “Yes” to any of the hazards (i.e. hurricane, wildfire, etc.), why did you evacuate? Select ALL that apply. Figure 7.1.4: 2016 Reasons for Evacuation (All Survey Responses: n= 464) Note: On average, respondents used 2 of the above factors as a part of their decision to evacuate. 37% 31% 28% 35% 22% 13% 24% 12% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40% A public official ordered an evacuation. A public official recommended an evacuation. There was no evacuation order but I chose to evacuate. I believed the hazard posed a real danger. Family members were evacuating. Neighbors were evacuating. Evacuated to protect children in our household. Other 488 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 80 of 265 Figure 7.1.5: 2016 Reasons for Evacuation (All Survey Responses: 0 – 2 Years (n=10); 3 – 5 Years (n=9); 6 – 10 Years (n=12); 11 – 20 Years (n=69); 21 or More Years (n=360)) “Other” Reasons: 6 – 10 Years (n=12)  No response 11 – 20 Years (n=5)  I don't remember whether evacuation was ordered or recommended  I evacuated to be with someone (mother-family) 60% 44% 33% 38% 36% 50% 56% 42% 30% 30% 20% 11% 17% 30% 29% 30% 22% 50% 29% 36% 20% 22% 17% 15% 23% 44% 17% 10% 12% 10% 11% 42% 23% 23% 8% 7% 14% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70% 0 - 2 Years 3 - 5 Years 6 - 10 Years 11 - 20 Years 21 or More Years A public official ordered an evacuation.A public official recommended an evacuation. There was no evacuation order but I chose to evacuate.I believed the hazard posed a real danger. Family members were evacuating.Neighbors were evacuating. Evacuated to protect children in our household.Other 489 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 81 of 265  Miami Beach 33141  No electricity with a newborn baby, left the county  homeless 21 or More Years (n=49)  I was a volunteer, managing a SNEC shelter center at the time a public official ordered an evacuation.  After Wilma without power I had rats in my house  All  BROTHER WITH BETTER PROPERTY  Chemical explosion in my apartment building  DIDN'T BELIEVE HOME WAS SAFE  Elderly living at home  Evacuated to go care for my mother, as her home care aids did not stay during hurricanes  Evacuated to protect other family members also in hurricane's potential path  Evacuated after Hurricane Andrew because there was no electricity and no water service.  Had friends and family in the area on vacation and rather than having spend time in hot place without electrical power and no A/C, we took off for Orlando.  Had to leave home after Hurricane Andrew--deemed uninhabitable  Home damaged  Hurricane Andrew the order to evacuate did not occur early enough.  Hurricane Andrew after the fact  I am in a high-rise condo and will evacuate if we get a cat 3 or higher hurricane, for a 1 or 2, the building is secure, for 3 or higher, or depending on the size and nature of any storm based on news reports and closely following the storms development, then I decide whether to stay or go. I lived through Hu rricane Andrew and never want to go through that again.  I evacuate to a shelter because I feel that these homes in Miami Dade County that have been through Hurricane Andrew, Wilma & Katrina can't take too much more! Peace of mind.  I had family to stay with in another zone  I lived on a boat at marina  Mom decided when child  My house was flooded  No electricity  Place was unsafe  Protect pets  Sick family member that may have required medical assistance  TV-evacuation  To protect pets as well.  Too young to remember  Worked in hospital had to return  evacuated to a stronger building structure 490 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 82 of 265  evacuated to protect elderly in household  had a newborn and felt more secure at my parents' location  had to be out of town the upcoming week and didn’t want to risk being stuck in miami  had to work on 72 hour emergency shift  i was a child & my family did so  lived in a trailer  never experienced a tragic disaster  no need to evacuate  not threatened but mock trial etc. - went to a hotel  only left while repairs were being made  seeing and feeling the weather  stayed at hospital - pregnancy  was moving that day and had not choice.  went in labor  went to adult child's home with added safeguards  went to stay with a relative Figure 7.1.6: 2016 Reasons for Evacuation (Randomized Mailing: n= 121) Open-ended Response Summary: Respondents indicated they had evacuated both before and following a disaster. Overwhelmingly, people evacuated because their place of residence was unsafe or to be with or protect family. Some indicated that there was no water or power at their house, or that they evacuated to protect their pets. Finally, some were in a medical facility (either sick or in labor), or had to go to work. 32% 28% 33% 30% 19% 11% 22% 8% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35% A public official ordered an evacuation. A public official recommended an evacuation. There was no evacuation order but I chose to evacuate. I believed the hazard posed a real danger. Family members were evacuating. Neighbors were evacuating. Evacuated to protect children in our household. Other 491 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 83 of 265 7.2 Evacuation Compliance Behavior Survey Question #13: If one of the hazards below threatened your community, and an evacuation for your area was ordered by public safety officials, how likely would you be to evacuate? Figure 7.2.1: 2016 Evacuation Behavior Based on Hazards (All Survey Responses: Hurricane n=1,923; Wildfire n=1,864; Flood n=1,872; HazMat n=1,863; Radiological n=1,868) Figure 7.2.2: 2016 Evacuation Behavior Based on Hazards (Randomized Mailing: Hurricane n=486; Wildfire n=466; Flood n=474; HazMat n=466; Radiological n=467) 67% 71% 53% 83% 87% 24% 15% 32% 11% 7% 8% 9% 13% 4% 3% 1% 5% 2% 3% 3% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Hurricane Wildfire Flood (example: rainstorm) Hazardous Materials Incident (example: chemical release) Radiological Incident (example: nuclear power plant) Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do not know 65% 67% 50% 80% 85% 23% 15% 32% 10% 6% 10% 11% 15% 6% 4% 2% 7% 3% 4% 5% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Hurricane Wildfire Flood (example: rainstorm) Hazardous Materials Incident (example: chemical release) Radiological Incident (example: nuclear power plant) Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do not know 492 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 84 of 265 Figure 7.2.3: 2014 Evacuation Behavior Based on Hazards (Hurricane n=2,025; Wildfire n=2,017; Flood n=2,018; Hazardous Materials Incident n=2,018; Radiological Incident n=2,015) 48% 51% 41% 61% 64% 28% 18% 28% 17% 13% 14% 10% 17% 7% 6% 7% 6% 8% 4% 4% 3% 4% 3% 4% 5% 1% 12% 3% 8% 9% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Hurricane Wildfire Flood (example: rainstorm) Hazardous Materials Incident (example: Chemical release) Radiological Incident (example: Nuclear Power Plant) Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Very Likely Not Likely at All Do Not Know Not Applicable 493 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 85 of 265 Comparative Analysis: National Trends and Findings  Usually, recommended or mandatory evacuation notices will receive universal compliance. Reasons for non-compliance include not having access to transportation, being mobility impaired, not being able to afford to evacuate, needing to work, ne eding to provide care, and an incorrect risk perception (they believe the hazard is not as dangerous as it actually is). Evacuation rates vary for different hazard types, for different events, and for different levels of risk (for example, different Storm Surge zones). Evacuation rates are very high for most hazardous material accidents, where compliance may be in the high 90% range. Evacuation rates are typically low for slow onset events such as riverine floods. Evacuation rates vary in hurricanes depending on the strength of the storm and location. In high-hazard storm surge area evacuation rates may be as high as 90% in major storms. Evacuation rates are much lower for smaller hurricanes and in lower risk zones (Rodriguez, Quarantelli, and Dynes, 2007; Bowser and Cutter, 2015).  Bowser and Cutter found that “while official evacuation notices are important and continue to be so, the more people believe their knowledge is adequate in the face of the hazard, the more willing they become to make their own decisions rather than deferring to expert opinion. The rise of hurricane-savvy populations mean that some coastal residents may be more willing to interpret risk information (sometimes incorrectly) independent of official directives (2015).  Individual demographic factors alone are inconsistent and insufficient in and of themselves to fully understand what motivates people to stay or leave in the face of a hurricane (Bowser and Cutter, 2015). 494 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 86 of 265 Survey Question #12: If an evacuation was ordered by public safety officials for your area, please indicate how likely you would be to do the following. Figure 7.2.4: 2016 Immediately Evacuate as Instructed (All Survey Responses: n=1,810) Figure 7.2.5: 2016 Immediately Evacuate as Instructed (Randomized Mailing: n=440) 54% 30% 14% 3% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do Not Know 51% 27% 18% 4% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do Not Know 495 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 87 of 265 Figure 7.2.6: 2016 First Consult with Family and Friends (All Survey Responses: n=1,582) Figure 7.2.7: 2016 First Consult with Family and Friends (Randomized Mailing: n=380) 42% 35% 22% 2% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do Not Know 46% 31% 20% 2% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do Not Know 496 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 88 of 265 Figure 7.2.8: 2016 Wait and See (All Survey Responses: n=1,568) Figure 7.2.9: 2016 Wait and See (Randomized Mailing: n=373) 24% 33% 41% 2% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do Not Know 30% 35% 32% 3% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do Not Know 497 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 89 of 265 Figure 7.2.10: 2016 Refuse to Evacuate (All Survey Responses: n=1,506) 3% 7% 82% 8% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do Not Know 498 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 90 of 265 Insights into: Respondents Likely to Refuse to Evacuate Of the 1,506 respondents who answered how likely they would be to refuse to evacuate, 52 indicated they were “very likely” to refuse to evacuate and 101 indicated they were “somewhat likely” to refuse to evacuate. County Resident Length Figure 7.2.11: Likelihood to Refuse to Evacuate by Length of County Residency (0 – 2 years n=85; 3 – 5 years n=79; 6 – 10 years n=97; 11 – 20 years n=222; 21 or more years n=1008) Figure 7.2.11 breaks down the likelihood to refuse to evacuate by length of County residency. There is a gradual increase in likelihood to refuse to evacuate as the length of residency in the County increases. Additionally, only those who have lived in the County for more than 5 years indicated they were “very likely” to refuse to evacuate. Storm Surge Zone The majority of respondents who selected they were “very likely” to refuse to evacuate did not provide an address or provided an unusable address to confirm what Storm Surge Zone they are in (63%). Of those who did provide a usable address, 58% selected an incorrect Storm Surge Zone. Considering a resident may select they are “very likely” to refuse to evacuate if they believe they are outside the Storm Surge Zones, the data was reviewed for that category; of the 7 who selected that they did not live in a Storm Surge Zone, 1 was confirmed correct, 3 were confirmed incorrect, and 3 did not provide an address to confirm their selection. The majority of respondents who selected they were “somewhat likely” to refuse to evacuate also did not provide an address or provided an unusable address to confirm what Storm Surge Zone they are in (62%). Of those who did provide a usable address, 42% selected an incorrect Storm Surge Zone. Considering a resident may select they are “somewhat likely” to refuse to evacuate if they believe they are outside 3% 3% 4% 5% 5% 4% 7% 7% 86% 90% 87% 83% 80% 9% 5% 6% 6% 9% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% 0 - 2 years 3 - 5 years 6 - 10 years 11 - 20 years 21 or more years Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do Not Know 499 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 91 of 265 the Storm Surge Zones, the data was reviewed for that category; of the 7 who selected that they did not live in a Storm Surge Zone, 2 were confirmed correct, 2 did not provide a usable address, and 3 did not provide an address to confirm their selection. Table 7.1.1: Respondents who are “Very Likely” or “Somewhat Likely” to Refuse to Evacuate Based on Actual Storm Surge Zone (Very Likely n=52; Somewhat Likely n=101)) Very Likely Somewhat Likely Total Correct Zone Incorrect Zone Total Correct Zone Incorrect Zone Zone A 0 0 0 2 0 2 Zone B 4 2 2 10 6 4 Zone C 2 1 1 4 2 2 Zone D 4 3 1 8 6 2 Zone E 4 2 2 9 6 3 No Zone 5 1 4 5 2 3 Unknown 33 N/A N/A 63 N/A N/A County Approval Another potential reason a respondent may have indicated they are “very likely” or “somewhat likely” to refuse to evacuate may depend on their confidence in the government. The below compares the respondents likelihood to evacuate by their approval ratings of the County in various topics. The data did not find a strong correlation between disapproval for the County & refusal to evacuate. In fact, in some areas, respondents who were “very likely” to refuse to evacuate approved more strongly of the County that those who were “not likely” to refuse to evacuate. Figure 7.2.12: Likelihood to Refuse to Evacuate by Confidence in Miami-Dade County Providing Services Necessary to Prepare Respondent for a Disaster (Not Likely n=1,150; Somewhat Likely n=93; Very Likely n=48) 31% 20% 47% 45% 45% 29% 15% 23% 14% 2% 2% 4% 1% 3% 6% 7% 6% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Not Likely to Refuse to Evacuate Somewhat Likely to Refuse to Evacuate Very Likely to Refuse to Evacuate Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree Disasgree Strongly Disagree Do Not Know 500 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 92 of 265 Figure 7.2.13: Likelihood to Refuse to Evacuate by Confidence in Miami-Dade County’s Ability to Protect, Respond, and Recovery from a Disaster (Not Likely n=1,127; Somewhat Likely n=93; Very Likely n=46) Figure 7.2.14: Likelihood to Refuse to Evacuate by Emergency Information Provided in a Language or Format the Respondent Can Understand (Not Likely n=1,187; Somewhat Likely n=99; Very Likely n=48) Figure 7.2.15: Likelihood to Refuse to Evacuate by Ease of Ability to Obtain Information During 29% 17% 44% 44% 48% 28% 17% 22% 16% 2% 4% 4% 1% 2% 8% 7% 8% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Not Likely to Refuse to Evacuate Somewhat Likely to Refuse to Evacuate Very Likely to Refuse to Evacuate Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree Disasgree Strongly Disagree Do Not Know 50% 37% 56% 42% 50% 30% 5% 11% 8% 2% 1% 1% 3% 1% 4% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Not Likely to Refuse to Evacuate Somewhat Likely to Refuse to Evacuate Very Likely to Refuse to Evacuate Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree Disasgree Strongly Disagree Do Not Know 501 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 93 of 265 an Emergency (Not Likely n=1,139; Somewhat Likely n=97; Very Likely n=48) Evacuation Preventions Respondents were asked to identify possible reasons they would be unable to evacuate; the data was reviewed to identify any differences between those who indicated they were “very likely,” “somewhat likely,” and “not likely” to refuse to evacuate. The data was expected to show the “very likely” to refuse to evacuate group with the highest ratings on factors prohibiting evacuation, followed by the “somewhat likely” group and then the “not likely” group (as was seen in the “Disability/health issues” category in Figure 7.2.15). However, the “somewhat likely” group tended to perceive more barriers to evacuation than the “very likely” group. The “very likely” group rated similarly to or below the “not likely” group on nearly all categories with the exception of the “Disability/health issues” factor and reiterating that they “would refuse to evacuate no matter what.” Figure 7.2.16: Likelihood to Refuse to Evacuate by Evacuation Preventions (Not Likely n=1,202; Somewhat Likely n=101; Very Likely n=51) 36% 28% 44% 44% 43% 40% 12% 20% 10% 1% 5% 2% 1% 1% 7% 3% 4% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Not Likely to Refuse to Evacuate Somewhat Likely to Refuse to Evacuate Very Likely to Refuse to Evacuate Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree Disasgree Strongly Disagree Do Not Know 502 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 94 of 265 Demographics There was a slight trend between likelihood to refuse to evacuate and education; those with lower educational attainments were more likely to refuse to evacuate than those with higher educational attainments. Figure 7.2.17: Likelihood to Refuse to Evacuate by Education (Not Likely n=1,203; Somewhat Likely n=101; Very Likely n=51) 24% 16% 16% 2% 18% 16% 8% 2% 12% 4% 16% 22% 22% 4% 37% 31% 22% 27% 33% 20% 14% 2% 23% 12% 9% 4% 10% 3% 21% 25% 14% 15% 15% 15% 17% 7% 19% 13% 6% 30% 2% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40% Pet Job Need to care for another person Spouse/significant other won't leave Need to stay and protect property Lack of money No place to go No transportation Traffic Lack of gas/fuel for vehicle Disability/health issues I would refuse to evacuate no matter what No obstacles would prevent me from evacuating Other "Very Likely" to Refuse to Evacuate "Somewhat Likely to Refuse to Evacuate""Not Likely" to Refuse to Evacuate 503 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 95 of 265 Income did not appear to be a deciding factor among respondents who were “very likely” to refuse to evacuate. Those who were “very likely” to refuse to evacuate were relatively even distributed among all income categories. Figure 7.2.18: Likelihood to Refuse to Evacuate by Income (Not Likely n=1,188; Somewhat Likely n=96; Very Likely n=52) Finally, it appeared that some vocations may be more likely to refuse to evacuate than others (such as healthcare, stay-at-home parents/caretakers, the retired, and the unemployed). The largest percentage of those who indicated they are “very likely” to refuse to evacuate among any vocation were the respondents who indicated they did 6% 18% 29% 24% 18% 2% 4% 5% 7% 23% 37% 27% 2% 1% 8% 21% 42% 28% 1% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Some High School High School Graduate Some College College Graduate Post Graduate Do Not Know Not Applicable "Very Likely" to Refuse to Evacuate "Somewhat Likely to Refuse to Evacuate""Not Likely" to Refuse to Evacuate 15% 12% 14% 14% 17% 12% 12% 6% 6% 3% 9% 31% 14% 29% 4% 3% 3% 4% 10% 30% 13% 31% 3% 7% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% $14,999 or Less $15,000 to $24,999 $25,000 to $39,999 $40,000 to $79,999 $80,000 to $99,999 $100,000 or More Do Not Know Not Applicable "Very Likely" to Refuse to Evacuate "Somewhat Likely to Refuse to Evacuate""Not Likely" to Refuse to Evacuate 504 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 96 of 265 not know what their job was, however there were only 8 respondents who selected this response. Figure 7.2.19: Employment by Likelihood to Refuse to Evacuate (Construction n=27; Agriculture and Landscaping n=8; Manufacturing n=13; Wholesale Trade n=8; Hospitality Services & Tourism n=34; University Student n=35; Retail and consumer services n=30; Transportation n=22; Utilities n=29; Professional, financial, or IT services n=161; Education n=73; Healthcare n=132; Government n=595; Military n=2; Stay-at-home parent/Caretaker n=16; Retired n=139; Unemployed n=37; Do not know n=8; Other n=110) Figure 7.2.20: 2016 Refuse to Evacuate (Randomized Mailing: n=351) 3% 1% 1% 6% 3% 6% 9% 5% 38% 3% 7% 8% 6% 7% 5% 10% 7% 5% 5% 7% 6% 10% 14% 5% 78% 88% 69% 75% 88% 83% 87% 86% 83% 84% 92% 83% 100% 88% 65% 70% 38% 88% 15% 13% 23% 25% 9% 11% 7% 9% 7% 8% 1% 8% 7% 15% 11% 25% 4% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Construction Agriculture and Landscaping Manufacturing Wholesale Trade Hospitality Services & Tourism University Student Retail and consumer services Transportation Utilities Professional, financial, or IT services Education Healthcare Government Military Stay-at-home parent/Caretaker Retired Unemployed Do not know Other "Very Likely" to Refuse to Evacuate "Somewhat Likely to Refuse to Evacuate" "Not Likely" to Refuse to Evacuate Do Not Know 505 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 97 of 265 5% 7% 76% 12% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do Not Know Comparative Analysis: National Trends and Findings  Evacuation is rarely an individual process. Even in single person households, the first response to the initial evacuation warning is to seek further information on the validity of the threat or consult with a friend, co-worker, neighbor, family member or relative. Evacuations usually take place in a group context (Drabek and Stephenson, 1971). 506 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 98 of 265 Survey Question #25: What might prevent you from leaving your place of residence if there was an evacuation order? Select ALL that apply. Figure 7.2.21: 2016 Factors Preventing Evacuation (All Survey Responses: n=1,901) Figure 7.2.22: 2016 Factors Preventing Evacuation (Randomized Mailing: n=484) 21% 23% 14% 14% 17% 14% 16% 6% 18% 12% 7% 1% 30% 2% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35% Pet Job Need to care for another person Spouse/significant other won't leave Need to stay and protect property Lack of money No place to go No transportation Traffic Lack of gas/fuel for vehicle Disability/health issues I would refuse to evacuate no matter what No obstacles would prevent me from evacuating Other 22% 11% 12% 13% 20% 11% 16% 5% 19% 12% 8% 2% 33% 2% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35% Pet Job Need to care for another person Spouse/significant other won't leave Need to stay and protect property Lack of money No place to go No transportation Traffic Lack of gas/fuel for vehicle Disability/health issues I would refuse to evacuate no matter what No obstacles would prevent me from evacuating Other 507 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 99 of 265 Figure 7.2.23: 2014 Factors Preventing Evacuation (n=2,010) 31% 16% 10% 15% 24% 22% 17% 9% 21% 14% 6% 2% 26% 2% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35% Pet Job Need to care for another person Spouse/Significant Other won’t leave Need to stay and protect property Lack of money No place to go No transportation Traffic Lack of gas/fuel for vehicle Disability/Health Issues Other (please specify) No obstacles would prevent me from evacuating I would refuse to evacuate no matter what 508 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 100 of 265 Figure 7.2.24: 2016 Factors Preventing Evacuation (All Survey Responses): Comparison by Annual Household Income (Less than $25,000 n=180; $80,000 or more n=767)* Note: Poverty is a multi-dimensional statistic with a variety of approaches to measure it. The U.S. Department of Health & Human Services releases annual guidelines based on the Census Bureau’s poverty thresholds adjusted based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI-U). These guidelines are based on the number of persons in the household and are developed in three overarching groups: the 48 contiguous states and the District of Columbia; Hawaii; and Alaska. Since identifying a single annual household income to measure poverty is difficult and is not localized, the chart above uses the bottom and top 30% of income earnings in Miami-Dade County (these groups are approximate – based on the 2015 5-Year American Community Survey estimates Table DP03 Selected Economic Characteristics, 30.7% of households in Miami-Dade County earn less than $25,000 and 28.1% of households earn more than $75,000). This survey measured income from $40,000 to $79,999 and $80,000 to $99,999, so the chart above does not include those who earn between $75,000 and $79,999. 20% 16% 13% 8% 12% 27% 19% 11% 9% 12% 13% 2% 23% 4% 22% 29% 14% 16% 18% 7% 10% 2% 20% 10% 4% 2% 29% 1% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35% Pet Job Need to care for another person Spouse/Significant Other won’t leave Need to stay and protect property Lack of money No place to go No transportation Traffic Lack of gas/fuel for vehicle Disability/Health Issues Other (please specify) No obstacles would prevent me from evacuating I would refuse to evacuate no matter what Annual Household Income of Less than $25,000 Annual Household Income of $80,000 or more 509 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 101 of 265 Figure 7.2.25: Job Preventing Evacuation by Employment (Construction n=41; Agriculture and Landscaping n=9; Manufacturing n=16; Wholesale Trade n=10; Hospitality Services & Tourism n=40; University Student n=37; Retail and consumer services n=37; Transportation n=25; Utilities n=30; Professional, financial, or IT services n=198; Education n=86; Healthcare n=169; Government n=752; Military n=3; Stay-at-home parent/Caretaker n=22; Retired n=239; Unemployed n=43; Do not know n=9; Other n=146) The data was also sorted to identify if any employment sectors tended to be a factor in determining the respondent’s ability to evacuate. Care should be taken when using this data, as some employment categories did not have many respondents (for example, there were only 3 military respondents). Others, however, received many respondents (for example, the 752 government workers). The larger the respondent group, the more confidence can be placed in the result. However, Miami-Dade County can also use these high ranking employment sectors as priority targets for future education regarding evacuation. 22% 11% 6% 40% 32% 19% 24% 33% 12% 24% 31% 32% 33% 2% 14% 18% 78% 89% 94% 100% 60% 68% 81% 76% 67% 88% 76% 69% 68% 67% 100% 98% 86% 100% 82% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Construction Agriculture and Landscaping Manufacturing Wholesale Trade Hospitality Services & Tourism University Student Retail and consumer services Transportation Utilities Professional, financial, or IT services Education Healthcare Government Military Stay-at-home parent/Caretaker Retired Unemployed Do not know Other Job May Prevent Evacuation Job Will Not Prevent Evacuation 510 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 102 of 265 Open-ended Response Summary: Most respondents who provided written responses felt they would not be able to leave due to work or family members. Some said they may feel unsafe traveling due to weather conditions and others felt their residence was safe and they would rather stay there. A few did not know if anything would prevent them from evacuating, and some indicated they would need assistance evacuating. Finally, one respondent indicated they were concerned it would be hard to get back to their neighborhood following the storm, another was concerned about travel difficulties, and another was concerned about his/her pet. Comparative Analysis: National Trends and Findings  Usually, recommended or mandatory evacuation notices will receive universal compliance. Reasons for non-compliance include not having access to transportation, being mobility impaired, not being able to afford to evacuate, needing to work, needing to provide care, and an incorrect risk perception (they believe the hazard is not as dangerous as it actually is). Evacuation rates vary for different hazard types, for different events, and for different level of risk (for example, different Storm Surge zones). Evacuation rates are very high for most hazardous material accidents, where compliance may be in the high 90% range. Evacuation rates are typically low for slow onset events such as riverine floods. Evacuation rates vary in hurricanes depending on the stren gth of the storm and location. In high-hazard storm surge area evacuation rates may be as high as 90% in major storms. Evacuation rates are much lower for smaller hurricanes and in lower risk zones (Rodriguez, Quarantelli, and Dynes, 2007; Bowser and Cutter, 2015). 511 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 103 of 265 7.3 Evacuation Influence Survey Question #15: Who is most likely to influence you to comply with an evacuation order? Please select ONE of the following. Figure 7.3.1: 2016 Evacuation Influence (All Survey Responses: n=1,919) Figure 7.3.2: 2016 Evacuation Influence (Randomized Mailing: n=482) 16% 23% 3% 10% 0% 2% 38% 0% 2% 3% 3% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45% Elected official (i.e. mayor) Family Friends and neighbors Local news and radio broadcasters Co-workers Employer Community group (church/faith-based, civic) Building manager (i.e., high rise or apartment) Do not know Other (please specify) 17% 21% 3% 10% 0% 1% 40% 1% 3% 3% 3% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45% Elected official (i.e. mayor) Family Friends and neighbors Local news and radio broadcasters Co-workers Employer Community group (church/faith-based, civic) Building manager (i.e., high rise or apartment) Do not know Other (please specify) 512 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 104 of 265 Figure 7.3.3: 2014 Evacuation Influence (n=2,031) Open-ended Response Summary: Of those who offered an alternate opinion of who would most likely influence them to comply with an evacuation order, many indicated they would rely on their own determination or that no one would influence their opinion. Others indicated that accurate information or a combination of elected officials, public safety officials, and family opinions would influence their decision to evacuate. Some felt they would need to comply with their employer’s evacuation procedures, or they would be influenced by their significant other (spouse, boyfriend, girlfriend, etc.). Finally, a few said they would be influenced by their community or residence (i.e., senior center or nursing home) or the need to protect their pets. Insights into: Respondents Most Influenced to Evacuate by Family and Friends Of the 490 respondents who selected they would be most influenced by their family, friends, and neighbors, 440 were most influenced by their family & 50 were most influenced by their friends and neighbors. The details below are provided to help Miami-Dade County reach those who may be most influenced by this group. Sources of Information This group relies heavily on local television for emergency information (96% “very likely” or “somewhat likely” to rely on), followed by the Weather Channel (91% “very likely” or “somewhat likely” to rely on) and local radio and Miami -Dade Alerts (both 90% “very likely” or “somewhat likely” to rely on). Just over a quarter of these respondents indicated they would be “very likely” or “somewhat likely” to rely on word of mouth (friends, family, coworkers, etc.) for emergency information, up f rom 66% of all respondents. This group is also slightly more inclined to rely on social media (60% “very likely” or “somewhat likely” to use) compared to all respondents (51% “very likely” or “somewhat likely” to use). 10% 39% 26% 5% 11% 1% 6% 3% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45% Elected official (i.e. Mayor) Public safety official (i.e. law enforcement, fire, emergency management) Family Friends and neighbors Local news and radio broadcasters Co-workers Do Not Know Other (please specify) 513 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 105 of 265 Figure 7.3.4: Sources of Emergency Information for Respondents who are most heavily influenced by Family and Friends during an Evacuation (Local Television n=476; Local Radio n=441; National/Cable News n=398; Weather Channel n=442; Print Media n=371; Internet Media n=408; Local Government Websites n=399; State Government Websites n=380; National Government Websites n=373; Social Media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) n=374; Word of Mouth (i.e. friends, family, co-workers) n=387; Miami-Dade Alerts n=425; Weather Radio n=394; Call 3-1-1 n=367; Other n=264) 85% 69% 57% 75% 23% 67% 45% 32% 34% 41% 44% 65% 47% 20% 10% 11% 21% 25% 15% 25% 20% 29% 29% 28% 19% 33% 25% 23% 19% 8% 4% 9% 16% 8% 48% 12% 25% 36% 36% 37% 21% 8% 27% 54% 35% 1% 2% 1% 4% 1% 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% 3% 7% 47% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Local Television Local Radio National/Cable News Weather Channel Print Media Internet Media Local Government Websites State Government Websites National Government Websites Social Media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) Word of Mouth (i.e. friends, family, co-workers) Miami-Dade Alerts Weather Radio Call 3-1-1 Other Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do not know 514 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 106 of 265 Factors Prohibiting Evacuation This group has slightly different factors prohibiting evacuation than the overall respondent group. Notably, they are more likely to need to care for another person or not leave due to their spouse or significant other. Figure 7.3.5: Factors Prohibiting Evacuation for Respondents who are most heavily influenced by Family and Friends during an Evacuation (Influenced by Family/Friends n=480) Demographics Nearly 93% of this group speaks English, 54% speak Spanish, 2% speak Haitian- Creole, 3% speak French & 5% speak another language. Just over 60% of this group is female. Figure 7.3.6: Age of Respondents who are most heavily influenced by Family and Friends during an Evacuation (n=485) 26% 24% 18% 21% 22% 19% 14% 5% 20% 14% 9% 1% 22% 3% 21% 23% 14% 14% 17% 14% 16% 6% 18% 12% 7% 1% 30% 2% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35% Pet Job Need to care for another person Spouse/significant other won't leave Need to stay and protect property Lack of money No place to go No transportation Traffic Lack of gas/fuel for vehicle Disability/health issues I would refuse to evacuate no matter what No obstacles would prevent me from evacuating Other Influenced by Family/Friends All Respondents 515 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 107 of 265 1% 6% 15% 30% 30% 10% 4% 4% 1% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% 16 - 19 20 - 24 25 - 34 35 - 49 50 - 64 65 - 74 75 - 79 80 or older Not Applicable Comparative Analysis: National Trends and Findings  It is well documented that emergency warnings are most effective at eliciting public protective actions like evacuation when those warnings are frequently repeated (Mileti and Beck, 1975), confirmatory in character (Drabek and Stephenson, 1971) and perceived by the public as credible (Perry et al., 1982).  Previous hazard research has documented that official sources are generally the most credible, and message recipients infer credibility from the source's credentials (e.g., job title and educational degrees), acceptance by other sources of known credibility, or previous history of job performance (Perry & Lindell, 1991).  The results of these studies indicate authorities (particularly firefighters and police) tend to be regarded as credible by the majority of all three ethnic groups, except under special circumstances (Lindell & Perry, 1992). African Americans and Whites tended to be more skeptical of the mass media than Mexican Americans. In general, Mexican Americans are more likely than African Americans or Whites to consider peers (friends, relatives, neighbors, or coworkers) to be the most credible sources.  As Kasperson (1987) noted, trust in institutions has been decreasing for some time and television anchors tend to be am ong the few people other than independent scientists that are generally trusted. Television anchors are trusted because they are familiar, authoritative, and have developed a track record of accuracy over time. 516 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 108 of 265 7.4 Hurricane Evacuation Survey Question #18: If a hurricane was threatening Miami-Dade County, and an evacuation was ordered for your area, how likely would you be to evacuate for the following Hurricane “Categories”? Figure 7.4.1: 2016 Hurricane Evacuation by Category Strength (All Survey Responses: Cat 1 n=1,780; Cat 2 n=1,795; Cat 3 n=1,820; Cat 4 n=1,850; Cat 5 n=1,847) Figure 7.4.2: 2016 Hurricane Evacuation by Category Strength (Randomized Mailing: Cat 1 n=448; Cat 2 n=447; Cat 3 n=458; Cat 4 n=463; Cat 5 n=468) 12% 20% 40% 69% 85% 16% 22% 32% 22% 9% 69% 56% 27% 8% 4% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Category 1 Hurricane? (Wind 74 - 95 mph) Category 2 Hurricane? (Wind 96 - 110 mph) Category 3 Hurricane? (Wind 111 - 129 mph) Category 4 Hurricane? (Wind 130 - 156 mph) Category 5 Hurricane? (Wind 157+ mph) Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do not know 10% 17% 39% 67% 82% 15% 23% 30% 21% 10% 72% 56% 28% 9% 4% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Category 1 Hurricane? (Wind 74 - 95 mph) Category 2 Hurricane? (Wind 96 - 110 mph) Category 3 Hurricane? (Wind 111 - 129 mph) Category 4 Hurricane? (Wind 130 - 156 mph) Category 5 Hurricane? (Wind 157+ mph) Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do not know 517 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 109 of 265 Figure 7.4.3: 2016 Hurricane Evacuation by Category Strength (All Survey Responses): Strongest Storm/Hurricane Experienced was a Category 3 or Higher (Category 1 n=1318; Category 2 n=1330; Category 3 n=1352; Category 4 n=1380; Category 5 n=1381) “If a hurricane was threatening Miami-Dade County, and an evacuation was ordered for your area, how likely would you be to evacuate for the following Hurricane “Categories”? Figure 7.4.4: 2016 Hurricane Evacuation by Category Strength (All Survey Responses): Strongest Storm/Hurricane Experienced was a Tropical Storm or Less (Category 1 n=181; Category 2 n=181; Category 3 n=186; Category 4 n=184; Category 5 n=186) “If a hurricane was threatening Miami-Dade County, and an evacuation was ordered for your area, how likely would you be to evacuate for the following Hurricane “Categories”? 8% 13% 32% 64% 83% 14% 20% 34% 25% 11% 77% 65% 33% 10% 4% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Category 1 Hurricane? (Wind 74 - 95 mph) Category 2 Hurricane? (Wind 96 - 110 mph) Category 3 Hurricane? (Wind 111 - 129 mph) Category 4 Hurricane? (Wind 130 - 156 mph) Category 5 Hurricane? (Wind 157+ mph) Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do not know 35% 48% 71% 87% 91% 29% 28% 22% 8% 4% 33% 19% 4% 2% 2% 3% 4% 4% 3% 4% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Category 1 Hurricane? (Wind 74 - 95 mph) Category 2 Hurricane? (Wind 96 - 110 mph) Category 3 Hurricane? (Wind 111 - 129 mph) Category 4 Hurricane? (Wind 130 - 156 mph) Category 5 Hurricane? (Wind 157+ mph) Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do not know 518 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 110 of 265 Survey Question #19: If you decide to evacuate your residence during a major (Category 3 or greater) hurricane threat, when would your household most likely evacuate? Please select the best answer. Figure 7.4.5: 2016 When Would You Most Likely Evacuate During a Major Hurricane Threat (All Survey Responses: n= 1,922) Figure 7.4.6: 2016 When Would You Most Likely Evacuate During a Major Hurricane Threat (Randomized Mailing: n= 495) 7% 15% 20% 46% 4% 8% 1% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50% When Miami-Dade County is in the projected landfall cone (3 - 5 days in advance) When a hurricane watch is issued (48 hours before landfall) When a warning is issued (36 hours before landfall) When ordered to evacuate I will not evacuate Do not know Not applicable 6% 16% 21% 41% 5% 11% 0% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45% When Miami-Dade County is in the projected landfall cone (3 - 5 days in advance) When a hurricane watch is issued (48 hours before landfall) When a warning is issued (36 hours before landfall) When ordered to evacuate I will not evacuate Do not know Not applicable 519 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 111 of 265 Comparative Analysis: National Trends and Findings  Perhaps the most significant issue associated with evacuation is the need to control travel demand, which is why influencing the number of evacuees on the roads becomes essential. A contributing problem is evacuation over-response, or “shadow evacuations.” “The percentages of overresponses are highly variable from place to place and from storm to storm. The general rule of thumb for emergency managers is the expectation of 10-15% shadow evacuees, but for some hurricanes, the percentages ranged upward to 49%” (Bowser and Cutter, 2015).  Research shows that many people leave before being directed or ordered to, particularly if they receive direct confirmation of a threat before an official warning is made. For example, after a chemical plant explosion on the Mississippi River, people left immediately after hearing the blast, returned to their homes, and then left again when ordered to do so by officials.  The 2011 South Carolina Hurricane Evacuation Stu dy found that during a Category 1 or 2 hurricane, just over 10% of residents living in a shadow evacuation zones planned on evacuating, however during a Category 3, 4, or 5 hurricane, the shadow evacuation percentage increased to nearly 70%.  Recent research confirms what has been known since the early 1990s: Storm-specific threat factors – strength, projected landfall, likely storm surge or high winds – are key influences on hurricane evacuation decisions (Bowser and Cutter, 2015). 520 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 112 of 265 7.5 Evacuation Relocation and Destinations Survey Question #16: Miami-Dade County officials encourage evacuees to stay with friends or relatives outside of areas being instructed to evacuate. If necessary, do you have friends or relatives in safe locations with whom you could stay during an evacuation? Figure 7.5.1: 2016 Stay with Family or Friends (All Survey Responses: n=1,921) Figure 7.5.2: 2016 Stay with Family or Friends (Randomized Mailing: n=485) 67% 24% 10% Yes No Do not know 61% 27% 11% Yes No Do not know 521 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 113 of 265 Figure 7.5.3: 2014 Stay with Family or Friends (n=2,027) Survey Question #20: If you were to evacuate, where would you most likely go? Figure 7.5.4: 2016 Evacuation Location (All Survey Responses: n=1,931) 68% 22% 10% Yes No Do not know 32% 11% 5% 0% 1% 0% 25% 7% 19% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35% Someplace else in Miami-Dade County Broward County, FL Palm Beach County, FL Monroe County. FL Collier County, FL Hendry County, FL Someplace else in Florida Someplace outside Florida Do not know 522 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 114 of 265 Figure 7.5.5: 2016 Evacuation Location (Randomized Mailing: n=496) Figure 7.5.6: 2016 Evacuation Location (All Survey Responses): Comparison by Annual Household Income (Less than $25,000 n=181; $80,000 or more n=775) 34% 9% 4% 2% 24% 8% 20% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40% Someplace else in Miami-Dade County Broward County, FL Palm Beach County, FL Collier County, FL Someplace else in Florida Someplace outside Florida Do not know 41% 8% 4% 1% 2% 13% 8% 23% 28% 12% 6% 0% 2% 29% 7% 16% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45% Someplace else in Miami-Dade County Broward County, FL Palm Beach County, FL Monroe County, FL Collier County, FL Someplace else in Florida Someplace outside Florida Do not know Annual Household Income of Less than $25,000 Annual Household Income of $80,000 or More 523 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 115 of 265 Open-ended Response Summary: Respondents indicated that they would evacuate to cities and counties across Florida and the country. T here were even a few international responses. The cities that the most people indicated they would evacuate to were Miami and Orlando. Other popular cities included Tampa, Fort Lauderdale, Pembroke Pines, Jacksonville, Davie, Boca Raton, Naples, and Tallah assee. Respondents also indicated they would travel all over the state, and planned to travel to over 60% of the counties in Florida. The most popular county to evacuate to remained Miami-Dade County, followed by Broward and Orange Counties. Other popula r counties to evacuate to included Palm Beach, Hillsborough, Duval, Lee, and Collier Counties. Some respondents did not know where they would evacuate to, or indicated that it would depend on the track of the storm. 524 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 116 of 265 Survey Question #21: If you were to evacuate, where would you most likely stay? Please select the best answer. Figure 7.5.7: 2016 Evacuation Shelter Location (All Survey Responses: n= 1,929) Figure 7.5.8: 2016 Evacuation Shelter Location (Randomized Mailing: n= 496) 9% 6% 2% 2% 52% 17% 10% 3% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60% Shelter/evacuation center operated by the county and Red Cross Pet-friendly evacuation center Church or place of worship Workplace Home of a friend or relative Hotel/motel Do not know Other (please specify) 9% 7% 3% 1% 49% 18% 10% 3% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60% Shelter/evacuation center operated by the county and Red Cross Pet-friendly evacuation center Church or place of worship Workplace Home of a friend or relative Hotel/motel Do not know Other (please specify) 525 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 117 of 265 Figure 7.5.9: 2014 Evacuation Shelter Location (n=2,020) Figure 7.5.10: 2016 Evacuation Shelter Location (All Survey Responses): Comparison By Annual Household Income (Less than $25,000 n=183; $80,000 or more n=774) 14% 8% 3% 4% 46% 13% 10% 3% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50% Shelter/Evacuation Center operated by the County and Red Cross Pet-Friendly Hurricane Evacuation Center Church or place of worship Workplace Home of a friend or relative Hotel/motel Do Not Know Other (please specify) 21% 7% 3% 1% 39% 12% 14% 4% 4% 4% 1% 2% 55% 22% 9% 4% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60% Shelter/evacuation center operated by the county and Red Cross Pet-friendly evacuation center Church or place of worship Workplace Home of a friend or relative Hotel/motel Do not know Other Annual Household Income of Less than $25,000 Annual Household Income of $80,000 or More 526 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 118 of 265 Open-ended Response Summary: Most of the open-ended respondents indicated that they would stay in their second or vacation home, RV, or boat, followed by staying with family and friends. Some indicated they would go to another Assisted Living Facility or the hospital. All respondents who indicated they would go to a hotel specified that they would go to a pet-friendly hotel. Insights into: Respondents who Plan to Use a Shelter There were 164 respondents who indicated they would likely use a Red Cross shelter (not including Pet-Friendly Evacuation Centers, which are discussed in Section 10). County Residency & Storm Experience Most of these respondents have lived in the county for 21 or more years (70%); 14% have lived in the county for 11-20 years, and 16% have lived in the county for less than 10 years. Generally, this group thinks highly of the County, as shown in Table 7.5.1. Table 7.5.1: County Approval of those with Planned Shelter Usage (Services n=153; Prepared n= 143; Language n=152; Obtain Information n=147) Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree Miami-Dade County is providing the services necessary to prepare me for a disaster. 42% 41% 11% 3% 3% Miami-Dade County is prepared to protect, respond, and recover from a disaster in my community. 40% 45% 11% 2% 2% During times of emergency, information is provided in a language or format I can understand. 49% 41% 5% 2% 2% I can easily obtain emergency information in times of emergency. 46% 37% 13% 1% 3% The largest percentage of these respondents (32%) have experienced a category 5 hurricane (6% have experienced a tropical storm, 7% have experienced a category 1 hurricane, 8% have experienced a category 2 hurricane, 16% have experienced a category 3 hurricane, 18% have experienced a category 4 hurricane). Evacuation Resources Half of these respondents (48%) indicated that they did have family or friends they could stay with during an evacuation. Eight percent (8%) of this group indicated that they do not have access to a vehicle. Fourteen percent (14%) of this group indicated that they or someone in their household would need assistance to evacuate. Of those who indicated they or someone in their household would need assistance, 24% did not know where that assistance would be coming from and 12% indicated they were 527 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 119 of 265 relying on an outside agency. While 38% of those needing assistance were registere d with the EEAP, 42% were not. Group Demographics Most (86%) of respondents speak English, 58% speak Spanish, 6% speak Haitian Creole, 8% speak French and 6% speak another language. Figure 7.5.11: 2016 Planned Shelter Usage by Ethnicity (n=159) Figure 7.5.12: 2016 Planned Shelter Usage by Home Type (n=162) 21% 6% 8% 14% 49% 1% 1% 6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Black – African American Black – Hispanic Black – Other White – Non Hispanic White – Hispanic Far East Asian South Asian Pacific Islander American Indian or Alaska Native Other 57% 11% 14% 10% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 5% Detached single family home Duplex, triplex, quadruple home Multi-family building – 4 stories or less (apartment/condo) Multi-family building – more than 4 stories (apartment/condo) Mobile home Manufactured home Boat Some other type of structure Not applicable Other (please specify) (click to view) 528 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 120 of 265 Figure 7.5.13: 2016 Planned Shelter Usage by Home Ownership (n=161) 7.6 Evacuation & Vehicle Usage Evacuation is intrinsically tied to the movement of people, often on roads. The survey sought to determine how people would leave, how many vehicles they planned to take, how many people would travel in those vehicles, and if increased travel times would impact evacuation plans. However, not all residents have access to a car. People with no access to a vehicle, sometimes called “carless” populations, refers to individuals and families in a community that do not have a personal vehicle and generally rely on public transportation on a daily basis. They may not have a vehicle for reasons including economic factors, geographic location (e.g., residents of urban areas may not own a vehicle), health conditions (e.g., those with physical disabilities, some of the very elderly), environmental conscientiousness, and those without a licen se. The following highlights vehicle usage during an evacuation. Survey Question #22: Which of the following methods of transportation would you most likely take during a hurricane evacuation? Please select the best answer. Figure 7.6.1: 2016 Methods of Transportation During a Hurricane Evacuation (All Survey Responses: n= 1,920) 63% 32% 1% 1% 4% Own Rent Other (please specify) (click to view) Do not know Not applicable 529 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 121 of 265 92% 3% 2% 0% 2% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% I would travel in a personal or rented vehicle, such as a car I would travel on an airplane I would travel on a passenger bus I would travel on a train Other (please specify) 530 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 122 of 265 Figure 7.6.2: 2016 Methods of Transportation During a Hurricane Evacuation (Randomized Mailing: n= 497) Figure 7.6.3: 2016 Methods of Transportation During a Hurricane Evacuation (All Survey Responses): Comparison by Annual Household Income (Less than $25,000 n=180; $80,000 or more n=774) 91% 3% 2% 0% 3% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% I would travel in a personal or rented vehicle, such as a car I would travel on an airplane I would travel on a passenger bus I would travel on a train Other (please specify) 80% 3% 8% 1% 8% 96% 3% 0% 0% 1% 0%20%40%60%80%100%120% I would travel in a personal or rented vehicle, such as a car I would travel on an airplane I would travel on a passenger bus I would travel on a train Other Annual Household Income of Less than $25,000 Annual Household Income of $80,000 or More 531 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 123 of 265 Insights into: Respondents who will Rely on Public Buses During an Evacuation The following charts and data look deeper into the 46 respondents who indicated they will rely on public buses during an evacuation. Access to Vehicles Over 50% of those who plan to use a bus to evacuate do not have access to a vehicle. Figure 7.6.4: Bus Riders by Vehicle Ownership (n=45) Storm Surge Zone Of the 25 respondents who provided their address to verify what Storm Surge Zone they live in, 12 selected the incorrect zone. The actual zones and selected zones for bus riders are shown below. The highest Storm Surge Zones that will rely on buses for evacuation tend to be Zones B & E. Table 7.6.1: Bus Riders by Storm Surge Zones (n=46) Actual Zone Selected Zone Zone A 1 4 Zone B 7 7 Zone C 3 3 Zone D 3 6 Zone E 7 9 Outside of Zones 4 4 Not Usable 21 13 51% 27% 13% 4% 4% Household does not have access to a vehicle 1 Vehicle 2 Vehicles 3 Vehicles 4 Vehicles 532 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 124 of 265 Home Ownership More respondents in this category rent than own their home. Figure 7.6.5: Bus Riders by Home Ownership (n=44) Home Type The majority of bus riders live in a multi-family building (apartment or condo) followed by detached single family homes. No bus riders lived in mobile homes (however, there were only 5 mobile home respondents in the entire survey). Figure 7.6.6: Bus Riders by Home Type (n=44) 41% 48% 2% 9% Own Rent Do not know Not applicable 533 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 125 of 265 EEAP A higher percentage of those who will rely on a bus for evacuation also indicated they will need extra assistance during an evacuation (12% of all respondents indicated they would or may need assistance, compared to 32% of those using a bus). Of the bus riders who indicated they would need assistance, only 5% were confident they were registered with the EEAP. Figure 7.6.7: Bus Riders by Evacuation Assistance Need (Bus Riders n=44) Figure 7.6.8: Bus Riders by Registration with the EEAP (Bus Riders n=19) 32% 9% 25% 18% 5% 5% 7% Detached single family home Duplex, triplex, quadruple home Multi-family building – 4 stories or less (apartment/condo) Multi-family building – more than 4 stories (apartment/condo) Manufactured home Some other type of structure Other (please specify) (click to view) 6% 21% 6% 11% 81% 48% 3% 11% 4% 9% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% All Respondents Bus Riders Yes Maybe No Do not know Not applicable 534 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 126 of 265 Demographics Figure 7.6.9: Bus Riders by Ethnicity (n=46) Figure 7.6.10: Bus Riders by Language Spoken in Household (n=45) 19% 5% 44% 42% 27% 47% 10% 5% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% All Respondents Bus Riders Yes No Do not know Not applicable 11% 11% 13% 28% 41% 2% 9% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Black – African American Black – Hispanic Black – Other (i.e. Haitian, Other West Indies) White – Non Hispanic White – Hispanic Pacific Islander Other (please specify) (click to view) 535 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 127 of 265 Figure 7.6.11: Bus Riders by Employment (n=45) Open-ended Response Summary (all responses): An equal number of respondents indicated that they would travel in their own vehicle, they did not know how they would evacuate, or they would rely on public transportation (bus, train, etc.). Some indicated they would rely on emergency responders (ambulance, police, or Red Cross) or that friends or family would pick them up. Finally, some respondents indicated they don’t drive anymore and would need assistance. Survey Question #23: How many vehicles does your household have access to? Figure 7.6.12: 2016 Number of Vehicles Residents Have Access to (All Survey Responses: n= 1,919) 87% 47% 11% 4% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% English Spanish Haitian Creole French 5% 2% 7% 19% 14% 5% 28% 9% 12% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30% Construction Hospitality Services & Tourism Retail and consumer services Healthcare Government Stay-at-home parent/Caretaker Retired Unemployed Other 536 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 128 of 265 Figure 7.6.13: 2016 Number of Vehicles Residents Have Access to (Randomized Mailing: n= 489) Insights into: Carless Households This section will look at some of the factors of the 67 respondents who indicated their household does not have access to a vehicle. Evacuation Transportation Of those without access to a vehicle, 33% still indicated they would travel in a personal or rented vehicle. The survey did not ask where this vehicle would come from; it is possible the respondent plans on renting a vehicle, borrowing one that is not available for everyday use, or traveling with friends, family, or neighbors. Thirty six percent (36%) of respondents without a car plan to evacuate by bus. Open ended 4% 29% 42% 17% 8% 1% 1% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Household does not have access to a vehicle 1 2 3 4 5 More than 5 5% 36% 40% 13% 5% 1% 0% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Household does not have access to a vehicle 1 2 3 4 5 More than 5 537 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 129 of 265 responses are presented below Figure 7.6.14. Figure 7.6.14: Evacuation Transportation (n=64) Open ended responses  Can't drive staying put  I do not know  My family will pick me up  Not sure mode of transportation  do not know  personal car was stolen-mostly likely bus/evacuation shuttles, if possible.  public transportation  red cross vehicle  senior citizen bus  uber  w/friend don't drive  with friend or public bus Likelihood to Evacuate Among those without cars there tends to be less certainty about what they are going to do during an evacuation. For example, 10% of those without a vehicle do not know if they will immediately evacuate compared to 3% of all respondents. There is a larger percentage of those who will “very likely” refuse to evacuate among those without a vehicle compared to all respondents, however the “very likely” an d “somewhat likely” categories combined are nearly the same between the two groups. Figure 7.6.15: Likelihood to Evacuate (No Vehicle Immediately Evacuate n=58; No Vehicle Consult n=53; No Vehicle Wait and See n=50; No Vehicle Refuse to Evacuate n=51) 33% 6% 36% 5% 20% Personal or Rented Vehicle (such as a car) Airplane Passenger bus Train Other 538 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 130 of 265 52% 54% 49% 42% 22% 24% 8% 3% 33% 30% 23% 35% 28% 33% 4% 7% 5% 14% 19% 22% 38% 41% 75% 82% 10% 3% 9% 2% 12% 2% 14% 8% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% No Vehicle All Respondents No Vehicle All Respondents No Vehicle All Respondents No Vehicle All RespondentsImmediatelyevacuateConsult withFamily &FriendsWait andSeeRefuse toevacuateVery Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do Not Know 539 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 131 of 265 Survey Question #23a: How many vehicles would your household most likely take if you evacuated? Note: Online, this question was only presented to respondents who indicated that they had access to at least one vehicle. In the hardcopy survey, respondents who indicated they did not have access to a vehicle were instructed to skip #23a and #23b. Figure 7.6.16: 2016 Vehicle Evacuation (All Survey Responses: n=1,806) Figure 7.6.17: 2016 Vehicle Evacuation (Randomized Mailing: n= 449) 0% 64% 28% 6% 2% 0% 0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Household does not have access to a vehicle 1 2 3 4 5 More than 5 0% 74% 20% 4% 1% 0% 0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Household does not have access to a vehicle 1 2 3 4 5 More than 5 540 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 132 of 265 Figure 7.6.18: 2014 Vehicle Evacuation (n=1,946) Car Destinations: To determine how many cars may be headed towards which destinations, all cars were summed by where the respondent indicated their family would evacuate. Of 1,970 respondents (not all of whom answered both the evacuation destination and the number of cars to be used for evacuation, a total of 2,466 cars were on the road. The table below shows the breakdown by major geographical area and th e corresponding number of cars. Table 7.6.2: Vehicle Evacuation Destinations (n=1,970) Location Evacuation Total Number of Cars Percentage Miami-Dade County 807 33% Broward County 316 13% South Florida 79 3% Central Florida 273 11% North Florida 61 2% Florida* 265 11% Outside Florida 190 8% Do Not Know 475 19% *Note: This category is for respondents who indicated they would remain in Florida but did not give any specifics as to where in Florida. 5% 56% 30% 5% 1% 0% 2% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 0 1 2 3 4 5+Do Not Know 541 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 133 of 265 Survey Question #23b: How many people total will evacuate in your household vehicles? Note: Online, this question was only presented to respondents who indicated that they had access to at least one vehicle. In the hardcopy survey, respondents who indicated they did not have access to a vehicle were instructed to skip #23a and #23b. Figure 7.6.19: 2016 Number of People Evacuating in Household Vehicles (All Survey Responses: n= 1,828) Figure 7.6.20: 2016 Number of People Evacuating in Household Vehicles (Randomized Mailing: n= 456) 13% 31% 18% 19% 9% 5% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 2% 0% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35% 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 9 People 10 People More than 10 (please specify) Do not know Not applicable 17% 36% 19% 18% 3% 2% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% 1% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40% 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 9 People 10 People More than 10 (please specify) Do not know Not applicable 542 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 134 of 265 Survey Questions #23a & #23b: Based on the number of vehicles residents plan to take and the number of people who would evacuate in those vehicles, the average estimated number of evacuees per car is:  Evacuating Within Miami-Dade County: 2.36 people/car  Evacuating Outside Miami-Dade County: 2.35 people/car Comparative Analysis: National Trends and Findings  Families will try to reunite, if possible, to evacuate as a group, but not necessarily in a single vehicle if two or more vehicles are owned. In business settings, co-workers typically evacuate in groups (Aguirre et al., 1998).  Households that take multiple vehicles and/or tra nsport boats, trailers, or campers add to traffic congestion and slow the overall clearance times of an area. For example, “in South Carolina’s Hurricane Floyd evacuation, 25% of the evacuees from the coast took two or more vehicles, resulting in major traffic jams on the interstates” (Bowser and Cutter, 2015). While it is likely impossible to prevent everyone from taking these types of personal possessions with them during an evacuation scenario, accurate data can be gathered to ensure existing transportation models accurately reflect the anticipated rate of households taking multiple vehicles or that plan on pulling boats, campers, and/or trailers. 543 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 135 of 265 Survey Question #24: During a hurricane threat/evacuation event, traffic volumes and travel times could be greater than usual. If significant traffic delays were anticipated on your planned evacuation route, what would you most likely do? Please select the best answer. Figure 7.6.21: 2016 Traffic Delays on Planned Evacuation Route (All Survey Responses: n= 1,910) Figure 7.6.22: 2016 Traffic Delays on Planned Evacuation Route (Randomized Mailing: n= 487) 5% 34% 40% 1% 5% 6% 9% 1% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45% Take the same route anyway Take alternative route(s) – i.e. backroads Leave earlier Delay travel plans (i.e. reassess/ leave at a later time) Change your destination (i.e. go somewhere else but out of your area) Return and/or remain at residence to ride out the storm Do not know Not applicable 6% 28% 39% 2% 6% 7% 11% 1% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45% Take the same route anyway Take alternative route(s) – i.e. backroads Leave earlier Delay travel plans (i.e. reassess/ leave at a later time) Change your destination (i.e. go somewhere else but out of your area) Return and/or remain at residence to ride out the storm Do not know Not applicable 544 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 136 of 265 The following tables and information describe the Storm Surge Zones (actual, based on the provided address) and evacuation destinations of respondents who indicated they would either take an alternative route or leave earlier to assist with determining evacuation clearance times. The data below only includes responses who answered all of the following questions:  (OPTIONAL) To verify your Storm Surge Zone, please provide your street address (or nearby intersection).  During a hurricane threat/evacuation event, traffic volumes and travel times could be greater than usual. If significant traffic delays were anticipated on your planned evacuation route, what would you most likely do? Please select the best answer.  If you were to evacuate, where would you most likely go? Figure 7.6.23: Actual Storm Surge Planning Zone A & Evacuation Destinations for those who would Leave Earlier during heavy evacuation traffic (n=21) Figure 7.6.24: Actual Storm Surge Planning Zone B & Evacuation Destinations for those who would Leave Earlier during heavy evacuation traffic (n=10) 50% 50% Miami-Dade County Broward County South Florida Central Florida North Florida Florida Outside Florida Do Not Know 545 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 137 of 265 Figure 7.6.25: Actual Storm Surge Planning Zone C & Evacuation Destinations for those who would Leave Earlier during heavy evacuation traffic (n=47) Figure 7.6.26: Actual Storm Surge Planning Zone D & Evacuation Destinations for those who would Leave Earlier during heavy evacuation traffic (n=93) 60% 10% 20% 10% Miami-Dade County Broward County South Florida Central Florida North Florida Florida Outside Florida Do Not Know 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% Miami-Dade County Broward County South Florida Central Florida North Florida Florida Outside Florida Do Not Know 546 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 138 of 265 14% 14% 14% 29% 7% 21% Miami-Dade County Broward County South Florida Central Florida North Florida Florida Outside Florida Do Not Know 547 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 139 of 265 Figure 7.6.27: Actual Storm Surge Planning Zone E & Evacuation Destinations for those who would Leave Earlier during heavy evacuation traffic (n=56) Figure 7.6.28: Actual Storm Surge Planning Outside Zones & Evacuation Destinations for those who would Leave Earlier during heavy evacuation traffic (n=61) Figure 7.6.29: Actual Storm Surge Planning No Address Provided/Unknown & Evacuation Destinations for those who would Leave Earlier during heavy evacuation traffic (n=313) 38% 13% 25% 13% 13% Miami-Dade County Broward County South Florida Central Florida North Florida Florida Outside Florida Do Not Know 25% 13% 13% 25% 25% Miami-Dade County Broward County South Florida Central Florida North Florida Florida Outside Florida Do Not Know 31% 16% 11% 11% 2% 7% 22% Miami-Dade County Broward County South Florida Central Florida North Florida Florida Outside Florida Do Not Know 548 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 140 of 265 Figure 7.6.30: Actual Storm Surge Zone for Respondents who would Remain at or Return to their Place of Residence due to High Traffic (n=60)* *Note: This chart does not include the 51 respondents who did not provide an address to confirm their Storm Surge Zone. Survey Question #26: If a hurricane was threatening Miami-Dade County and you decide to leave your residence before the storm, what major highways/roadways within Miami-Dade County would you most likely take to your destination? Select ALL that apply. Figure 7.6.31: 2016 Preferred Roadways During Evacuation (All Survey Responses: n= 1,881) 3% 7% 15% 32% 18% 15% 10% Zone A Zone B Zone C Zone D Zone E Outside of Zones Do Not Know 80% 38% 33% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Highways (ex. I-95, Dolphin Expressway, Turnpike, etc.) Major Roadways (i.e., 3-4 lane roads) (ex. 27th Avenue, LeJuene Avenue, 163 Street, 36 Street, etc.) Side Roads (i.e., 1-2 lane roads) 549 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 141 of 265 Figure 7.6.32: 2016 Preferred Roadways During Evacuation (Randomized Mailing: n= 467) Figure 7.6.33: Preferred Roadways During Evacuation by Evacuation Destination (Highways n=1,521; Major Roadways n= 725; Side Roads n=638) 81% 36% 32% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Highways (ex. I-95, Dolphin Expressway, Turnpike, etc.) Major Roadways (i.e., 3-4 lane roads) (ex. 27th Avenue, LeJuene Avenue, 163 Street, 36 Street, etc.) Side Roads (i.e., 1-2 lane roads) 26% 39% 36% 12% 10% 12% 5% 3% 4% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 29% 20% 18% 8% 7% 7% 19% 19% 21% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Highways Major Roadways Side Roads Someplace else in Miami-Dade County Broward County, FL Palm Beach County, FL Monroe County. FL Collier County, FL Hendry County, FL Someplace else in Florida Someplace outside Florida Do not know 550 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 142 of 265 7.7 Observations & Considerations Most respondents have not evacuated for a hazard in Miami -Dade County. Just under 25% of respondents have evacuated for a hurricane, 6% have evacuate d for a flood, 5% for a wildfire and 4% for a hazardous materials incident. Of those who evacuated, most remained in the county (Figure 7.1.1). When deciding to evacuate, most residents had at least 2 influencing factors; 37% of respondents said they evacuated because a public official ordered an evacuation and 35% said they believed the hazard posed a real danger. Respondents were least likely to evacuate because they saw their neighbors evacuating (13%) (Figure 7.1.4). Respondents who have lived in Miami-Dade County for less than 5 years were most likely to evacuate because a public official ordered or recommended an evacuation. Those who have lived in the county for 6 to 10 years were most strongly influenced by their belief that the hazard posed a real danger, those who have lived in the county for 11 to 20 years were most strongly influenced by a public official ordering an evacuation, and those who have lived in the county for over 21 years were equally influenced by an evacuation order and their belief in the hazard’s danger (Figure 7.1.5). The likelihood of a respondent to comply with an evacuation order may have a correlation to the unfamiliarity of the hazard. Flooding is a common threat in the county; it also received the lowest evacuation ratings (53% very likely to evacuate). Hurricanes are also relatively common; they received a 67% “very likely” to evacuate score. Hazardous materials incidents and especially radiological incidents are relatively rare and also received the highest “very likely” to comply ratings (83% and 87%, respectively) and the lowest “not likely” to comply ratings (4% and 3%, respectively) (Figure 7.2.1). Compared to the 2014 ratings, residents indicated they are more likely to evacuate following an order for all listed hazards. This finding correlates to the research that suggests evacuation rates will be high for most hazardous materials events and lower for flooding events. Over half of respondents indicated they would “very likely” evacuate immediately as instructed following an evacuation order (Figure 7.2.4). Seventy-seven percent (77%) of respondents would “very likely” or “likely” consult with family and friends (Figure 7.2.6). Just under a quarter of respondents would “very likely” first wait and see how bad the situation was (Figure 7.2.8), and only 3% would “very likely” refuse to evacuate no matter what (Figure 7.2.10). This finding supports the research that evacuations are rarely an individual process. Of those who selected reasons why they may not be able to evacuate, the highest ranked concern was their job (23%) followed by their pet (21%) (Figure 7.2.21). The concern over their pet declined from 31% in 2014 (Figure 7.2.23). Those with annual household incomes of greater than $80,000 were twice as likely to not evacuate due to their job (29%), their spouse (16%), or traffic (20%) compared to those with annual household incomes of less than $25,000 (job: 16%, spouse: 8%, traffic: 9%) (Figure 7.2.25). Compared to those with an annual household income of greater than $80,000, those with annual household income of less than $25,000 were twice as likely to not 551 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 143 of 265 evacuate due to not having a place to go (19%), three t imes as likely due to disability/health issues (13%) and four times as likely due to lack of money (27%) (Figure 7.2.24). The highest percentage of respondents who indicated that their job may be a factor in not evacuating work in hospitality & tourism (40%). One third of respondents who work as a university student, in utilities, healthcare, or the government also indicated that their jobs may prevent them from evacuating (one third of military respondents also indicated this was the case, but there were only 3 military respondents) (Figure 7.2.25). Overwhelmingly, public safety officials were rated as the most likely person to influence respondents to comply with an evacuation order (38%). Nearly a quarter of respondents rated family as their most likely influence (23%) followed by an elected official (16%). Local news and radio broadcasters were preferred by 10% of respondents (Figure 7.3.1). Although the majority of respondents selected a source that Miami-Dade County works closely with (i.e., public safety officials, elected official, and local news and radio), a sizeable amount of respondents chose family, friends, or neighbors (26% combined). Miami-Dade County should consider how to best reach those who may be influenced by their loved ones; one potential option for consideration is to have Miami-Dade County partners encourage listeners to share information with their loved ones and encourage them to follow evacuation orders. Evacuation compliance for hurricanes increases as the storm strength increases. Nearly 70% of respondents indicated they were “not likely” to evacuate for a Category 1 hurricane but 85% would comply with an evacuation order for a Category 5 hurricane (Figure 7.4.1). Respondents who have either never experienced a tropical system o r have only experienced a tropical storm are more likely than the overall respondent group to comply with an evacuation notice for all hurricane categories; only one -third of this group was “not likely” to evacuate for a Category 1 hurricane (Figure 7.4.4). The majority of respondents indicated they would evacuate when ordered to evacuate (46%). Seven percent (7%) indicated they would evacuate 3 to 5 days before landfall, 15% following a hurricane watch 48 hours before landfall, and 20% following a hurricane warning 36 hours before landfall (Figure 7.4.5). Although the majority of respondents (67%) had family or friends they could stay with during an evacuation, 24% did not and 10% did not know (Figure 7.5.1). Most respondents indicated they would stay within Miami-Dade County (32%) or within Florida (25%), but 19% of respondents did not know where they would go during an evacuation (Figure 7.5.4). Households with an annual income of less than $25,000 are more likely to stay within Miami-Dade County than those households with an annual income of $80,000 or more (41% compared to 28%) and households with an annual income of $80,000 or more are twice as likely to travel someplace else in Florida than those with less than $25,000 (29% compared to 13%) (Figure 7.5.6). 552 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 144 of 265 The majority of respondents planned to stay with a friend or relative during an evacuation (52%) or a hotel (17%), but 9% planned to stay at a shelter and 6% planned to stay at a Pet-Friendly Evacuation Center (PFEC). Ten percent (10%) did not know where they would stay (Figure 7.5.7). Those with an annual income of greater than $80,000 were more likely to stay with a friend or relative (55%) and twice as likely to stay in a hotel or motel (22%) than those with annual incomes of less than $25,000 (39% and 12%, respectively). Those with annual incomes of less than $25,000 were twice as likely to use the PFEC (7%) and five times more likely to use a shelter (21%) than those with annual incomes of greater than $80,000 (4% and 4%, respectively) (Figure 7.5.10). Of those who indicated they planned to use a shelter (not including a PFEC), most are long-term residents (70% have lived in the county for more than 21 years) and have experienced a major hurricane (66% have experienced a category 3 or higher hurricane). The majority (57%) live in a detached single family home, but a quarter live in a multi-family building, such as an apartment or condo. Only 1% live in a mobile home (Figure 7.5.12). The majority are also home owners (63%) (Figure 7.5.13). Half of these respondents indicated they did have family or friends they could stay with during an evacuation; it is not immediately clear why they plan to stay in a shelter instead of with family or friends. Most respondents who indicated they planned to use a shelter were White – Hispanic (49%), followed by Black – African American (21%) and White – Non-Hispanic (14%) (Figure 7.5.11). Most (86%) of respondents speak English, 58% speak Spanish, 6% speak Haitian Creole, 8% speak French and 6% speak another language. Nearly all respondents planned to evacuate by a personal or rented vehicle (car) (92%) (Figure 7.6.1). When broken into annual income groups, 96% of those with annual household incomes of greater than $80,000 would travel by car while only 80% of those with $25,000 or less would travel by car. Eight percent (8%) of those with annual incomes of less than $25,000 would travel on a passenger bus and 8% selected “other” as their means of transportation (Figure 7.6.3). Four percent (4%) of respondents do not have access to a vehicle. Of those who do have access to a vehicle, the majority (64%) plan to bring on e during an evacuation and 36% plan to bring two or more. Half of the respondents with cars plan to remain in South Florida (33% in Miami-Dade County, 13% in Broward County, and 3% in other South Florida counties). The majority of respondents indicated two people would be evacuating in their household vehicles (31%). On average, respondents plan to bring 2.36 people per car (the difference between in county and out of county averages is 0.01). If heavy traffic was expected on a planned evacuation route, mo st respondents would either leave earlier (40%) or take an alternative route (34%). Heavy traffic could influence 6% of respondents to not evacuate. Of those who may not evacuate, the majority (32%) live in Storm Surge Zone D, followed by Storm Surge Zone E (18%). The least likely group to not evacuate due to heavy traffic are in Storm Surge Zone A (3%). 553 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 145 of 265 Storm Surge Zones do not appear to have a strong correlation to the evacuation destination of respondents; the majority of all respondents in each Storm Surge Zone planned to remain in Miami-Dade County. There was a slight but imperfect trend between actual Storm Surge Zone and knowing where the respondent will evacuate to; in general, those in higher risk Storm Surge Zones had fewer respondents who did not know where they planned to evacuate to (10% in “Zone A”) compared to lower risk zones (24% in “Zone E”). However, 17% of “Zone B” respondents did not know wh ere they would evacuate compared to 10% of “Zone C” respondents, so the trend is not firm. Of those who would take alternative routes to avoid heavy evacuation traffic, the majority from each Storm Surge Zone would still remain in Miami-Dade County. Eighty percent (80%) of survey respondents plan to take highways during an evacuation, 38% plan to take major roadways, and 33% plan to take side roads (respondents were asked to select all that applied) (Figure 7.6.33). The majority of respondents (29%) who indicated they would take highways i ndicated they would evacuate to “someplace else in Florida,” followed by 26% who would remain in Miami- Dade County. 554 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 146 of 265 Page Intentionally Left Blank 555 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 147 of 265 8. STORM SURGE PLANNING ZONES 556 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 148 of 265 8 STORM SURGE PLANNING ZONE Storm surge is the greatest threat to life and property from a hurricane. It occurs when water from the ocean is pushed on shore by the force of hurricanes. In 2013, Mia mi- Dade County identified new Storm Surge Planning Z ones to identify areas that people may need to evacuate for during certain hurricanes. Evacuation may be ordered for an entire zone, or a portion of a zone, depending on the hurricane’s track and projected storm surge; independent of the hurricane’s category.  Residents in Zone A are at risk for storm surge in Category 1 and higher storms.  Residents in Zone B are at risk for storm surge in Category 2 and higher storms.  Residents in Zone C are at risk for storm surge in Category 3 and higher storms.  Residents in Zone D are at risk for storm surge in Category 4 and higher storms.  Residents in Zone E are at risk for storm surge in Category 5 storms. 557 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 149 of 265 558 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 150 of 265 8.1 Storm Surge Planning Zone & Awareness Survey Question #11: Using the map below or at this website [http://gisweb.miamidade.gov/communityservices/?ShowWhat=OEM], within which of the following Storm Surge Planning Zones do you currently live in? Please select only ONE of the following. (Note: Use the map of the County’s Storm Surge Planning Zones to determine what zone you live in. After visiting the link, click ok and type your address). Figure 8.1.1: 2016 Storm Surge Planning Zones (All Survey Responses: n= 1,888) Figure 8.1.2: 2016 Storm Surge Planning Zones (Randomized Mailing: n= 485) 7% 15% 12% 27% 15% 12% 7% 2% 1% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30% Zone A: Greatest risk for storm surge for category 1 and higher storms Zone B: Greatest risk for storm surge for category 2 and higher storms Zone C: Greatest risk for storm surge for category 3 and higher storms Zone D: Greatest risk for storm surge for category 4 and higher storms Zone E: Greatest risk for storm surge for category 5 and higher storms I do NOT live in a Storm Surge Planning Zone I do NOT KNOW if I live in a Storm Surge Planning Zone Map does not show my location Not applicable 7% 13% 12% 21% 18% 9% 16% 4% 1% 0%5%10%15%20%25% Zone A: Greatest risk for storm surge for category 1 and higher storms Zone B: Greatest risk for storm surge for category 2 and higher storms Zone C: Greatest risk for storm surge for category 3 and higher storms Zone D: Greatest risk for storm surge for category 4 and higher storms Zone E: Greatest risk for storm surge for category 5 and higher storms I do NOT live in a Storm Surge Planning Zone I do NOT KNOW if I live in a Storm Surge Planning Zone Map does not show my location Not applicable 559 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 151 of 265 Figure 8.1.3: 2014 Storm Surge Planning Zones (n= 528) Figure 8.1.4: Likelihood to Evacuate for a Hurricane After an Evacuation Ordered by a Public Safety Official by Actual Storm Surge Zone* (A n=47; B n=166; C n=127; D n=288; E n=168; Outside Zones n=167; No Address Provided/Unknown n=895) *Note: This chart only includes respondents who provided a street address to verify their Storm Surge Evacuation Zone. 8% 7% 7% 5% 3% 17% 50% 3% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60% Zone A: Greatest risk for storm surge for category 1 and higher storms Zone B: Greatest risk for storm surge for category 2 and higher storms Zone C: Greatest risk for storm surge for category 3 and higher storms Zone D: Greatest risk for storm surge for category 4 and higher storms Zone E: Greatest risk for storm surge for category 5 and higher storms I do NOT live in a Storm Surge Planning Zone I do NOT KNOW if I live in a Storm Surge Planning Zone Not applicable 72% 72% 67% 62% 69% 75% 65% 19% 20% 28% 27% 21% 17% 25% 6% 6% 5% 8% 9% 7% 9% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% A B C D E Outside Zones No Address Provided/Unknown Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do not know 560 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 152 of 265 Figure 8.1.5: Evacuation Destination by Actual Storm Surge Zone* (A n=47; B n=166; C n=128; D n=292; E n=167; Outside Zones n=166; No Address Provided/Unknown n=896) *Note: This chart only includes respondents who provided a street address to verify their Storm Surge Evacuation Zone. Figure 8.1.6: Planned Shelter Usage by Actual Storm Surge Zone* (A n=47; B n=166; C n=127; D n=288; E n=168; Outside Zones n=167; No Address Provided/Unknown n=895) *Note: This chart only includes respondents who provided a street address to verify their Storm Surge Evacuation Zone. 2% 5% 2% 4% 3% 66% 50% 48% 56% 53% 49% 52% 17% 19% 18% 16% 18% 14% 17% 2% 8% 2% 2% 5% 5% 2% 2% 4% 6% 8% 5% 7% 4% 7% 9% 6% 8% 13% 8% 2% 2% 1% 3% 1% 1% 1% 6% 12% 15% 9% 7% 9% 10% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% A B C D E Outside Zones No Address Provided/Unknown Church Fam/Friend Hotel/motel Other Pet Shelter Shelter Work Do not know 4% 4% 7% 2% 10% 9% 4% 13% 6% 6% 12% 8% 8% 16% 13% 5% 18% 8% 7% 15% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20% General Shelter Pet Shelter All Shelters (General & Pet Combined) A B C D E Outside Zones No Address Provided/Unknown 561 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 153 of 265 Figure 8.1.7: Evacuation Transportation by Actual Storm Surge Zone (A n=46; B n=165; C n=128; D n=290; E n=165; Outside Zones n=167; No Address Provided/Unknown n=896) *Note: This chart only includes respondents who provided a street address to verify their Storm Surge Evacuation Zone. 6% 4% 1% 2% 3% 2% 4% 2% 1% 4% 2% 2% 96% 86% 92% 94% 94% 95% 92% 1% 1% 2% 4% 2% 2% 1% 1% 3% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Airplane Bus Personal or rented vehicle Train Other 562 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 154 of 265 8.2 Storm Surge Planning Zone Accuracy Assessment Of the 2,047 respondents who provided what Storm Surge Zone they believe they live in, 1,208 respondents (59%) provided a street address to verify their Storm Surge Zone. The unusable addresses (158) were not included in the percentage totals for each Storm Surge Zone, but are provided at the bottom of each applicable table for reference. Of those who provided usable addresses (1,050 respondents), 704 respondents (67%) selected the correct Storm Surge Zone for their address. This is an increase from the 15% of respondents who selected the correct Storm Surge Zone for their address in 2014. Note: Responses from the 2014 survey have been included. The percentages from the 2014 survey have been changed in this report to reflect the updated calculating methodology which does not include unusable addresses in total percentages to allow for a direct comparison with 2016 data. Example The example below demonstrates the differences between the 2016 data and how the original 2014 data was originally calculated. 2016 2014 Count Percent Count Percent Zone A 11 37% 11 30% Zone B 11 37% 11 30% Zone C 8 26% 8 22% Zone D 0 0% 0 0% Zone E 0 0% 0 0% Does not reside in a Zone 0 0% 0 0% N/A Not Included Not Included 7 19% Total 30 100% 37 100% 563 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 155 of 265 Storm Surge Planning Zone A Table 8.1.1: Respondents who indicated they live in "Zone A" Respondents who indicated they live in "Zone A" 2014 Data Actual Zone Count Percent Notes Count Percent Zone A 37 46% 46% of those who believe they live in “Zone A” actually live in “Zone A”. 11 37% Zone B 25 31% 11 37% Zone C 9 11% 8 26% Zone D 4 5% 0 0% Zone E 2 3% 0 0% Does not reside in a Zone 3 4% 0 0% Total 80 100% 30 100% Unusable Address 14 N/A Indicated they live in “Zone A”, but couldn’t use their address to verify. 7 X No Address 53 N/A Indicated they live in “Zone A”, but didn’t provide an address to verify. X X Table 8.1.2: Respondents who actually live in "Zone A" Respondents who actually live in "Zone A" 2014 Data Respondent’s Answer Count Percent Notes Count Percent Zone A 37 76% 76% of those who live in “Zone A” know they live in “Zone A” 11 50% Zone B 5 10% 3 14% Zone C 3 6% 1 5% Zone D 1 2% 1 5% Zone E 0 0% 0 Does not reside in a Zone 0 0% 1 5% Does not know if they reside in a Zone 3 6% 6% of those who live in “Zone A” do not know if they live in a Storm Surge Planning Zone. 5 22% Map does not show address 0 0% X X Not Applicable 0 0% X X Total 49 100% 22 100% 564 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 156 of 265 Storm Surge Planning Zone B Table 8.1.3: Respondents who indicated they live in "Zone B" Respondents who indicated they live in "Zone B" 2014 Data Actual Zone Count Percent Notes Count Percent Zone A 5 3% 3 12% Zone B 125 77% 77% of those who believe they live in “Zone B” actually live in “Zone B”. 17 65% Zone C 16 10% 6 23% Zone D 5 3% 0 0% Zone E 8 5% 0 0% Does not reside in a Zone 3 2% 0 0% Total 162 100% 26 100% Unusable Address 27 N/A Indicated they live in “Zone B”, but couldn’t use their address to verify. 8 X No Address 123 N/A Indicated they live in “Zone B”, but didn’t provide an address to verify. X X Table 8.1.4: Respondents who actually live in "Zone B" Respondents who actually live in "Zone B" 2014 Data Respondent’s Answer Count Percent Notes Count Percent Zone A 25 14% 11 13% Zone B 125 68% 68% of those who live in “Zone B” know they live in “Zone B” 17 20% Zone C 10 5% 1 1% Zone D 3 2% 2 2% Zone E 6 3% 2 2% Does not reside in a Zone 1 1% 5 6% Does not know if they reside in a Zone 9 5% 5% of those who live in “Zone B” do not know if they live in a Storm Surge Planning Zone. 46 55% Map does not show address 3 2% X X Not Applicable 1 1% X X Total 183 100% 84 100% 565 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 157 of 265 Storm Surge Planning Zone C Table 8.1.5: Respondents who indicated they live in "Zone C" Respondents who indicated they live in "Zone C" 2014 Data Actual Zone Count Percent Notes Count Percent Zone A 3 2% 1 4% Zone B 10 8% 1 4% Zone C 87 72% 72% of those who believe they live in “Zone C” actually live in “Zone C”. 12 50% Zone D 9 7% 6 25% Zone E 7 6% 2 8% Does not reside in a Zone 5 4% 2 8% Total 121 100% 24 100% Unusable Address 16 N/A Indicated they live in “Zone C”, but couldn’t use their address to verify. 0 X No Address 116 N/A Indicated they live in “Zone C”, but didn’t provide an address to verify. X X Table 8.1.6: Respondents who actually live in "Zone C" Respondents who actually live in "Zone C" 2014 Data Respondent’s Answer Count Percent Notes Count Percent Zone A 9 6% 8 8% Zone B 16 11% 6 6% Zone C 87 62% 62% of those who live in “Zone C” know they live in “Zone C” 12 12% Zone D 14 10% 5 5% Zone E 2 1% 2 2% Does not reside in a Zone 5 4% 7 7% Does not know if they reside in a Zone 8 6% 6% of those who live in “Zone C” do not know if they live in a Storm Surge Planning Zone. 61 60% Map does not show address 0 0% X X Not Applicable 0 0% X X Total 141 100% 101 100% 566 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 158 of 265 Storm Surge Planning Zone D Table 8.1.7: Respondents who indicated they live in "Zone D" Respondents who indicated they live in "Zone D" 2014 Data Actual Zone Count Percent Notes Count Percent Zone A 1 0% 1 3% Zone B 3 1% 2 7% Zone C 14 5% 5 17% Zone D 236 85% 85% of those who believe they live in “Zone D” actually live in “Zone D”. 15 52% Zone E 11 4% 4 14% Does not reside in a Zone 14 5% 2 7% Total 279 100% 29 100% Unusable Address 36 N/A Indicated they live in “Zone D”, but couldn’t use their address to verify. 0 X No Address 237 N/A Indicated they live in “Zone D”, but didn’t provide an address to verify. X X Table 8.1.8: Respondents who actually live in "Zone D" Respondents who actually live in "Zone D" 2014 Data Respondent’s Answer Count Percent Notes Count Percent Zone A 4 1% 2 2% Zone B 5 2% 0 0% Zone C 9 3% 6 6% Zone D 236 74% 74% of those who live in “Zone D” know they live in “Zone D” 15 16% Zone E 15 5% 3 3% Does not reside in a Zone 15 5% 26 28% Does not know if they reside in a Zone 31 10% 10% of those who live in “Zone D” do not know if they live in a Storm Surge Planning Zone. 42 45% Map does not show address 2 1% X X Not Applicable 1 0% X X Total 318 100% 94 100% 567 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 159 of 265 Storm Surge Planning Zone E Table 8.1.9: Respondents who indicated they live in "Zone E" Respondents who indicated they live in "Zone E" 2014 Data Actual Zone Count Percent Notes Count Percent Zone A 0 0% 0 0% Zone B 6 4% 2 11% Zone C 2 1% 2 11% Zone D 15 9% 3 15% Zone E 120 74% 74% of those who believe they live in “Zone E” actually live in “Zone E”. 10 53% Does not reside in a Zone 20 12% 2 11% Total 163 100% 19 100% Unusable Address 25 N/A Indicated they live in “Zone E”, but couldn’t use their address to verify. 0 X No Address 119 N/A Indicated they live in “Zone E”, but didn’t provide an address to verify. X X Table 8.1.10: Respondents who actually live in "Zone E" Respondents who actually live in "Zone E" 2014 Data Respondent’s Answer Count Percent Notes Count Percent Zone A 2 1% 1 2% Zone B 8 5% 0 0% Zone C 7 4% 2 4% Zone D 11 6% 4 7% Zone E 120 69% 69% of those who live in “Zone E” know they live in “Zone E” 10 18% Does not reside in a Zone 10 6% 15 27% Does not know if they reside in a Zone 12 7% 7% of those who live in “Zone E” do not know if they live in a Storm Surge Planning Zone. 23 42% Map does not show address 4 2% X X Not Applicable 1 1% X X Total 175 100% 55 568 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 160 of 265 Resides Outside a Storm Surge Planning Zone Table 8.1.11: Respondents who indicated they do not live in a Storm Surge Zone Respondents who indicated they do not live in a Storm Surge Zone 2014 Data Actual Zone Count Percent Notes Count Percent Zone A 0 0% 1 1% Zone B 1 1% 5 7% Zone C 5 4% 7 10% Zone D 15 12% 26 38% Zone E 10 8% 15 22% Does not reside in a Zone 99 76% 76% of those who believe they do not live in a Storm Surge Zone actually live outside of a Zone. 15 22% Total 130 100% 69 100% Unusable Address 16 N/A Indicated they do not live in a Zone, but couldn’t use their address to verify. 14 X No Address 102 N/A Indicated they do not live in a Zone, but didn’t provide an address to verify. X X Table 8.1.12: Respondents who actually do not live in a Storm Surge Zone Respondents who actually do not live in a Storm Surge Zone 2014 Data Respondent’s Answer Count Percent Notes Count Percent Zone A 3 2% 1 2% Zone B 3 2% 1 2% Zone C 5 3% 2 3% Zone D 14 8% 2 3% Zone E 20 11% 2 3% Does not reside in a Zone 99 54% 54% of those who do not live in a Storm Surge Zone know they do not live in Storm Surge Zone 15 24% Does not know if they reside in a Zone 24 13% 13% of those who do not live in a Storm Surge Zone do not know if they live in a Storm Surge Planning Zone. 40 63% Map does not show address 10 5% X X Not Applicable 6 3% X X Total 184 100% 63 100% 569 Miami-Dade County Evacuation Study 2016 Page 161 of 265 Do Not Know What Storm Surge Planning Zone Respondent Resides In Table 8.1.13: Respondents who indicated they do not know if they live in a Storm Surge Zone Respondents who indicated they do not know if they live in a Storm Surge Zone 2014 Data Actual Zone Count Percent Notes Count Percent Zone A 3 3% 5 2% Zone B 9 10% 46 21% Zone C 8 9% 61 28% Zone D 31 36% 42 19% Zone E 12 14% 23 11% Does not reside in a Zone 24 28% 40 18% Total 87 100% 217 100% Unusable Address 14 N/A Indicated they do not know if they live in a Zone, but couldn’t use their address to verify. 54 X No Address 49 N/A Indicated they do not know if they live in a Zone, but didn’t provide an address to verify. X X Comparative Analysis: National Trends and Findings  “Risk is an inherently spatial concept where location really matters… If people do not understand where they are in relation to different levels of storm surge on a map, they may plan incorrectly in response to a hurricane warning… The incorrect identification of risk zones points to potential misunderstandings of where people are at risk, and this lack of knowledge complicates and results in unnecessary e vacuations or, more importantly, failures to leave as the hurricane approaches” (Bowser and Cutter, 2015).  Recent studies have shown only one-third to two-thirds of coastal residents can accurately identify their hurricane risk areas, even when shown a risk area map (Arlikatti, et al 2006; Zhang, Prater & Lindell, 2004). 570 Page 162 of 265 8.3 Observations & Considerations The 2016 survey saw a dramatic decrease in the percentage of respondents who selected that they did not know their Storm Surge Planning Zone down to 7% in 2016 from 50% in 2014 (Figure 8.1.1). Evacuation compliance by actual Storm Surge Planning Zone is relatively similar across all zones. The largest percentage of respondents who were “very likely” to comply with an evacuation order lived outside the Storm Surge Zones (75%) followed closely by Storm Surge Zones A & B (both at 72%). The lowest “very likely ” to comply zone was “Zone D” at 62%. However all zones (including the respondents who did not leave an address or the address was unusable) had 90% or more respondents “very likely” or “somewhat likely” to comply with an evacuation order (Figure 8.1.4). The largest percentage of those who plan to use a shelter come from o utside the Storm Surge Zones (18%) and the smallest percentage come from “Zone A” (4%), however there is not a linear increase between the two categories. No “Zone A” respondents planned to use the PFEC and there was a gradual increase between “Zone B” (2%) to “Zone E” (8%) in PFEC usage. Combined, there is a gradual increase in use of general and pet-friendly shelters from “Zone A” (4%) to outside the zones (18%) (Figure 8.1.6). Between 1% & 4% of all Storm Surge Zones plan to use the bus to evacuate, however personal vehicle is still the highest preferred evacuation mode among all zones (Figure 8.1.7). One thousand and fifty respondents provided usable addresses to compare their selected Storm Surge Planning Zone with their actual Storm Surge Planning Zone. Of these, 76% selected the correct Storm Surge Planning Zone for their address. Overall, Storm Surge Planning Zone comprehension appears to have dramatically increased across all zones. In every zone, larger percentages (in some cases, dramatically larger percentages) of respondents correctly identified their zone and smaller percentages of respondents indicated they did not know if they lived in a zone. Zone A Forty-six percent (46%) of those who believe they live in “Zone A” actually live in “Zone A” (up from 37% in 2014) (Table 8.1.1). Seventy-six percent (76%) of those who live in “Zone A” know they live in “Zone A” (up from 50% in 2014). Six percent (6%) of those who live in “Zone A” do not know if they live in a Storm Surge Planning Zone (down from 22% in 2014) (Table 8.1.2). Zone B Seventy-seven percent (77%) of those who believe they live in “Zone B” actually live in “Zone B” (up from 65% in 2014) (Table 8.1.3). Sixty-eight percent (68%) of those who live in “Zone B” know they live in “Zone B” (up from 20% in 2014). Five percent (5%) of those who live in “Zone B” do not know if they live in a Storm Surge Planning Zone (down from 55% in 2014 (Table 8.1.4). 571 Page 163 of 265 Zone C Seventy-two percent (72%) of those who believe they live in “Zone C” actually live in “Zone C” (up from 50% in 2014) (Table 8.1.5). Sixty-two percent (62%) of those who live in “Zone C” know they live in “Zone C” (up from 12% in 2014). Six percent (6%) of those who live in “Zone C” do not know if they live in a Storm Surge Planning Zone (down from 60% in 2014) (Table 8.1.6). Zone D Eighty-five percent (85%) of those who believe they live in “Zone D” actually live in “Zone D” (up from 52% in 2014) (Table 8.1.7). Seventy-four percent (74%) of those who live in “Zone D” know they live in “Zone D” (up from 16% in 2014). Ten percent (10%) of those who live in “Zone D” do not know if they live in a Storm Surge Planning Zone (down from 45% in 2014) (Table 8.1.8). Zone E Seventy-four percent (74%) of those who believe they live in “Zone E” actually live in “Zone E” (up from 53% in 2014) (Table 8.1.9). Sixty-nine percent (69%) of those who live in “Zone E” know they live in “Zone E” (up from 18% in 2014). Seven percent (7%) of those who live in “Zone E” do not know if they live in a Storm Surge Plannin g Zone (down from 42% in 2014) (Table 8.1.10). Outside a Storm Surge Planning Zone Seventy-four percent (74%) of those who believe they do not live in a Storm Surge Zone actually live outside of a Zone (up from 22% in 2014) (Table 8.1.11). Fifty-four percent (54%) of those who do not live in a Storm Surge Zone know they do not live in Storm Surge Zone (up from 24% in 2014). Thirteen percent (13%) of those who do not live in a Storm Surge Zone do not know if they live in a Storm Surge Planning Zone (down from 63% in 2014) (Table 8.1.12). Map does not show my address A new option in the 2016 survey allowed respondents to indicate if the map did not show their address. Fifty one respondents selected this response. All valid addresses (19) were found on the map. Thirty two addresses were unusable, due to possible misspelled words, street names without a house number or cross street, and only providing zipcodes. 572 Page 164 of 265 9. FUNCTIONAL & ACCESS NEEDS 573 Page 165 of 265 9 FUNCTIONAL & ACCESS NEEDS While it is true that inequalities and vulnerabilities resulting from race and ethnicity, gender, age, disability, class, and other areas are major stratifying forces in society with or without the occurrence of disasters, these patterns of vulnerability become magnified and more obvious during disaster events. Consequently, these special populations are typically exposed to greater risks and face increased hardships during a disaster event, especially one that requires evacuation at any scale. The terms "vulnerable", "special needs", and "functional needs" populations are often used to characterize groups whose needs are not fully addressed by traditional means. Special populations are people who feel they cannot comfortably or safely access and use the standard resources offered in disaster p reparedness, response, and recovery. They include, but are not limited to, those who are physically or mentally disabled (blind, deaf, hard-of-hearing, cognitive disorders, mobility limitations), limited or non-English speaking, geographically or culturally isolated, medically or chemically dependent, homeless, frail/elderly, and children. Whereas the majority of individuals within Miami-Dade County will have the means and resources to self-evacuate, it should be noted that the individuals who will most likely necessitate assistance during an evacuation will likely be the individ uals discussed in this section. 9.1 Evacuation Assistance Survey Question #27: In an evacuation, would you or anyone in your household require special assistance in order to evacuate? Figure 9.1.1: 2016 Require Special Assistance (All Survey Responses: n= 1,920) 6% 6% 81% 3% 4% Yes Maybe No Do not know Not applicable 574 Page 166 of 265 Figure 9.1.2: 2016 Require Special Assistance (Randomized Mailing: n= 488) Figure 9.1.3: 2014 Require Special Assistance (n=2,015) 7% 5% 74% 6% 9% Yes Maybe No Do not know Not applicable 10% 12% 74% 3% 1% Yes Maybe No Do Not Know Not Applicable 575 Page 167 of 265 Figure 9.1.4: 2016 Require Special Assistance (All Survey Responses): Residents 65 and older (n=326) Survey Question #27a: Would that assistance be provided by someone within your household, by an outside agency, or by a friend or relative outside your household? Note: Online, this question was only presented to respondents who indicated that they or someone in their household requires or may require special assistance to evacuate . In the hardcopy survey, respondents who indicated no one in their household needed special assistance to evacuate were instructed to skip #27a, #27b, and #27c. Figure 9.1.5: 2016 Provision of Assistance (All Survey Responses: n= 321) 23% 6% 69% 6% 7% Yes Maybe No Do Not Know Not Applicable 42% 22% 9% 27% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45% Within household Friend/Relative (outside household) Outside Agency Do not know 576 Page 168 of 265 Figure 9.1.6: 2016 Provision of Assistance (Randomized Mailing: n= 86) Figure 9.1.7: 2014 Provision of Assistance (n=438) 34% 22% 8% 36% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40% Within household Friend/Relative (outside household) Outside Agency Do not know 49% 29% 9% 14% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60% Within household Friend/Relative (outside household) Outside Agency Do not know 577 Page 169 of 265 Survey Question #27b: If applicable, please indicate what kind of outside assistance your household may need during an evacuation (i.e. Transportation, Medical, etc.). Note: Online, this question was only presented to respondents who indicated that they or someone in their household requires or may require special assistance to evacuate . In the hardcopy survey, respondents who indicated no one in their household needed special assistance to evacuate were instructed to skip #27a, #27b, and #27c. The following are a sample of the open-ended responses (also see Appendix A): Of the 128 open ended responses, 46% requested transportation assistance, 25% requested medical assistance, 13% requested mobility assistance, and 3% requested electricity. The specific Access and Functional Needs groups mentioned in the comments included the elderly, infants, pregnant women, and those who are dependent on electricity and refrigeration. Survey Question #27c: Is this person registered with Miami-Dade County’s Emergency & Evacuation Assistance Program (EEAP)? Individuals who may need special assistance during an evacuation are recommended to register with Miami -Dade County’s Emergency and Evacuation Assistance Program (EEAP) if they think they will need assistance. (Note: A link to the EEAP is provided at the end of the survey) Note: Online, this question was only presented to respondents who indicated that they or someone in their household requires or may require special assistance to evacuate. In the hardcopy survey, respondents who indicated no one in their household needed special assistance to evacuate were instructed to skip #27a, #27b, and #27c. Of those respondents that said they or someone in their household would need special assistance during an evacuation, 19% said this person is registered with Miami -Dade County’s Emergency & Evacuation Assistance Program (EEAP). Another 44% said this person is not registered, 27% did not know. Figure 9.1.8: 2016 Emergency & Evacuation Assistance Program (All Survey Responses: n= 285) 19% 44% 27% 10% Yes No Do not know Not applicable 578 Page 170 of 265 Figure 9.1.9: 2016 Emergency & Evacuation Assistance Program (Randomized Mailing: n= 74) Figure 9.1.10: 2014 Emergency & Evacuation Assistance Program (n=439) 10% 53% 31% 7% Yes No Do not know Not applicable 26% 49% 20% 6% Yes No Do not know Not applicable 579 Page 171 of 265 9.2 Emergency & Evacuation Assistance Program As part of the study, a total of 34 individuals registered on Miami-Dade County’s Emergency and Evacuation Assistance Program (EEAP) were interviewed via telephone. Under most circumstances, the caretaker/caregiver was interviewed on behalf of the EEAP registrant. The duration of the interviews ranged from 10 to 30 minutes in length. The survey questions (see Appendix B) served as the basis for the interviews; however, interviewers were encouraged to ask follow -up questions and probe, as appropriate. An additional 17 individuals registered on Miami-Dade County’s Emergency and Evacuation Assistance Program (EEAP) took the survey. The qualitative findings from both the interview and survey are included in this section. The following is a summation of the key findings. Comparative Analysis: National Trends and Findings  The current general population is one that is diverse, aging, and focused on maintaining independence as long as possible. The popularity of living situations that provide an “as needed” level of care in the least restrictive manner is fast becoming the norm. Consideration should therefore be given to people who may be able to function independently under normal situations, but who may need assistance in an emergency situation. A 2005 survey for the AARP found that 15% of adults age 50 or older, and 25% over the age of 75, require assistance from another person to evacuate from their home in the event of a natural disaster (AARP, 2006).  An estimated 1,800 persons died in Hurricane Katrina and its aftermath. The fatalities were disproportionately elderly, with 71 % of the victims older than 60, and 47% over the age of 75. Of the elderly affected by Katrina, most lived independently, and many were disabled and mobility-restricted (Benson and Aldrich, 2007).  A Kaiser Family Foundation survey found that 40% of hurricane Katrina victims who did not evacuate were either physically unable to leave or were caring for a person with a disability (Kaiser, 2006).  According to the Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities’ Emergency Management Task Force in 2006, people with disabilities comprised 25% to 30% of those impacted by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita (CCDEM, 2006).  Research has shown that older adults, especially those living alone, are likely to have a strong bond with their pets and are unwilling to evacuate without them (Garrity and Anthrozoos, 1989; Heath, 2001). 580 Page 172 of 265 It should be noted that individuals choose to register on the County’s EEAP for various reasons. While these individuals’ motivations to be part of this program may vary significantly, they generally are individuals with functional and access needs that may require assistance to evacuate during an emergency or disaster. Reasons varied from being asthmatic and diabetic to being completely bed -ridden and dependent upon medical assistance/devices. Preparedness Activities When interviewees and survey respondents were asked what preparedness activities their household had done, it was interesting to note that most of the respondents indicated that they had signed up for the EEAP. Four (4) of them emphasized the importance of having a generator. A common thread, much like the 2014 study, was participants’ dependence on electricity. Over half of those surveyed and interviewed indicated they had an emergency preparedness plan. For many respondents, medical devices and equipment, such as oxygen dispensers/tanks, were very important. A few indicated they had done nothing. When respondents were asked how the County could better assist them to prepare for an emergency or disaster, the following responses were provided:  Some asked for mailers, such as preparedness materials, flyers showing them the storm surge planning zones, evacuation maps, and emergency contact information (English/Spanish) during hurricane season. One respondent suggested that when a person purchases a home in the county, they should be informed which evacuation zone they reside in.  Given respondents’ dependence on electricity, a few indicated that the County needed to restore power/electricity in a timelier manner. One respondent shared that they are bed ridden and would need power immediately to keep their medical equipment functioning. Another suggested they would need electricity to keep their medicine refrigerated.  While the EEAP provides accommodations for the registrant, other members of the family/household were not sure where to go. Most respondents recognized that only one caregiver/caretaker would be allowed to accompany the registrant to the shelter/hospital. Some respondents suggested an alternative strategy be created to provide accommodations for other members of the household.  One respondent indicated that the EEAP needed to have a follow -up telephone number in case they needed more information.  Another respondent suggested that the Miami-Dade web site URL is too long to remember. The suggestion was offered to create an easier URL to access during emergencies.  One respondent shared that many elderly people in the county have not signed up for the EEAP. She suggested that the County needs to better educate them about the program. She recommended the County do mo re targeted presentations to educate and inform key population groups. She indicated that the only way she found out about the program was because she was a public health nurse. 581 Page 173 of 265  More than 4 respondents indicated that they did not know what to do with their pets. They suggested the County needed to provide information or a strategy to help EEAP registrants care for their pets while they are at the hospital/shelter. Disaster Information & Preferred Sources When interviewees were asked where they would most likely get their disaster information, responses were mostly consistent with the general population (television, Internet, etc.). Access for information and warning via cell/mobile phone was also a common theme amongst respondents. For a few respondents, reliance on family members and/or caregivers to keep them informed was consistent. One respondent said, “I am too old to keep up with this on my own.” Evacuation & Compliance When respondents were asked if they would evacuate and comply with the evacuation instructions, most respondents indicated they would comply (over 90% of respondents). Respondents also seemed to be very cognizant of their own vulnerabilities, which seemed to play a role in their will ingness to comply and trust the County. Unique to this group of respondents was their trust and reliance on their doctor and/or nurse on their decision to evacuate. This was especially true for those who are bed ridden. One respondent indicated that the “other” kids (not registered in the EEAP program) and parents would “wait and see” before evacuating, but the child needing EEAP assistance would go immediately to the designated shelter/hospital. The respondent indicated they would all like to go to the s ame shelter with the child, but they were told only one parent could stay with the child. The respondent indicated maybe they would follow in the car to see if they would make an exception. Another respondent indicated that she would not evacuate even if things were very dire, because she is extremely ill and bed ridden. Evacuation Assistance For those respondents indicating they would need assistance to evacuate, over 40% said they would need assistance from an outside agency. Over 30% did not know where the assistance would come from. Additionally, transportation and medical assistance were listed as the specific areas of help that would be needed during an evacuation. Shelter/Evacuation Center When participants were asked where they would go if ordered to evacuate, most interviewees indicated they would most likely go to a hospital. Those who were dependent upon medical devices expressed a preference for going to a hospital. One respondent indicated he would not go to a shelter. He would only go if he was being sent to a hospital. Overall, however, interviewees were favorable about going to a shelter/hospital. Some evacuees had evacuated before and felt their needs were met. Three respondents indicated that the last time they evacuated per the program, they were assigned to 582 Page 174 of 265 locations a good distance from their place of residence. The next time, they would prefer to be relocated somewhere closer. One common theme amongst households with a person registered under the EEAP program was the desire to stay together. This was also true of pets. For example, one respondent said they have dogs. They would find a hotel near the hospital where their son would go per the EEAP program. The mother would go with the boy to the hospital and the rest of the family would go to the hotel, including their dogs. When interviewing one caregiver, she indicated they had 8 dogs and would not leave them “no matter what.” She said, “My animals are my kids.” One respondent suggested they may try to smuggle the pet into the hospital. Another respondent said she had no idea where to go, but would like to be close to her grandmother who is registered in the EEAP program. 9.3 Observations & Considerations To increase services throughout the county, Miami-Dade followed up with all respondents who indicated they needed assistance and provided contact information. Although most of the respondents (81%) indicated that neither they nor anyone in their household would need assistance to evacuate, 15% indicated that they or someone in their household would or may need assistance, or they did not know (Figure 9.1.1). Of those 65 or older, 35% indicated that they or someone in their household would or may need assistance, or they did not know (Figure 9.1.4). Most of the expected assistance would come from within the household (42%) or a friend or relative (22%), however 9% planned to rely on an outside agency and 27% did not know where the assistance would come from (nearly double from 14% in 2014) (Figure 9.1.5). Of those who indicated that they will, may, or do not know if they’ll need assistance, 44% indicated that this person is not signed up with the EEAP, which is a slight improvement from 49% in 2014 (Figure 9.1.8). Although the County has been able to register many residents with access and functional needs in the EEAP, it appears that there are still many residents who are either not aware or not signed up for this service. The County is recommended to increase advertisements regarding this service and to consider additional ways to promote registration, perhaps through partnering with and informing geriatric doctors and other medical professionals who serve the access and functional needs community. 583 Page 175 of 265 Page Intentionally Left Blank 584 Page 176 of 265 10. EMERGENCY PET PREPAREDNESS 585 Page 177 of 265 10 EMERGENCY PET PREPAREDNESS Miami-Dade County recognizes the growing need to accommodate pet care needs during a disaster. Growing research, including this study, suggests that many pet owners will stay with or care for their animals during a disaster, especially if their animals have no way of evacuating. Unfortunately, if people are not willing to comply with authorities, these actions will likely begin a chain reaction that will potentially jeopardize the safety and lives of the animal owners themselves and rescuers, which may seriously disrupt the overall disaster management process. Contributing to the growing challenge of addressing animal issues during a disaster is that society today is undergoing unique changes in its attitudes toward animals. Of note, one of the most significant cultural changes is society’s increasing acceptance of companion animals as family members. For example, in one study, over 90% of pet owners identify their pets as members of their family (Hall et al, 2004). In that same study, one-third of dog owners felt closer to their dogs than to any human family member. As such, there is growing dependence (i.e. both economic and emotional) and value placed upon animals in today’s society. This human -animal bond, which is oftentimes ignored or not fully understood in context of disaster response, must be acknowledged in order to more readily mitigate, prepare for, respond to, and recover from a disaster event impacting the county. 10.1 Pet Ownership & Preparedness Survey Question #28: Do you have pets? 50% of respondents own a pet or pets. Figure 10.1.1: 2016 Pet Ownership (All Survey Responses: n= 1,926) 50% 49% 1% Yes No Do not know Not applicable 586 Page 178 of 265 Figure 10.1.2: 2016 Pet Ownership (Randomized Mailing: n= 497) Figure 10.1.3: 2014 Pet Ownership (2,014) 46% 54% 1% Yes No Do not know Not applicable 56% 43% 1% 1% Yes No Do not know Not applicable 587 Page 179 of 265 Survey Question #28a: If yes, please indicate what kind of pets you have. Please select ALL that apply. Note: Online, this question was only presented to respondents who indicated that they have at least one pet. In the hardcopy survey, respondents who indicated they did not have a pet were instructed to skip #28a, #28b, #28c, and #28d. Of those respondents who own pets, 76% own dogs and 36 % own cats. Figure 10.1.4: 2016 Pet Types (All Survey Responses: n= 952) Figure 10.1.5: 2016 Pet Types (Randomized Mailing: n= 224) Figure 10.1.6: 2014 Pet Types (n=1,112) 76% 36% 16% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90% Dog(s) Cat(s) Other pets (please specify) 76% 36% 20% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80% Dog(s) Cat(s) Other pets (please specify) 74% 42% 15% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80% Dog(s) Cat(s) Other pets (please specify) 588 Page 180 of 265 Open-ended Response Summary: Many respondents indicated that they have birds, fish, rabbits, and tortoises/turtles as pets. Other common pets included guinea pigs, hamsters, bearded dragons, and snakes. Some respondents indicated they had farm animals, such as chickens, horses, and livestock. Survey Question #28b: If yes, how many pets do you have? Note: Online, this question was only presented to respondents who indicated that they have at least one pet. In the hardcopy survey, respondents who indicated they did not have a pet were instructed to skip #28a, #28b, #28c, and #28d. Of the 720 respondents who indicated they had a dog for a pet, 60% had one dog, 28% had two dogs, 8% had three dogs, and 4% had between four and six dogs (for a total of 1,124 dogs). Of the 332 respondents who indicated they had a cat for a pet, 44% had one cat, 31% had two cats, 11% had three cats, 6% had four cats, and 7% had between five and twenty cats (for a total of 747 cats). Of the 134 respondents who indicated they had an animal besides a dog or ca t for a pet, 37% had one pet, 25% had two pets, 12% had three pets, 6% had four pets, 10% had between five and ten pets, 5% had between eleven and twenty pets, and 5% had between twenty one and eighty pets (for a total of 710 pets). Of the 2,581 pets referenced in the survey, 44% were dogs, 29% were cats, and 28% were another type of animal. Comparative Analysis: National Trends and Findings  It should be noted that not all types of animals will be affected equally by a disaster. Research suggests that in previous disasters, up to 90% of pets found after an incident have been cats (Heath, 1999).  Dog owners have an increased risk of evacuation failure due to logistical difficulties. This is especially true for “outdoor dogs”, which may be less tolerant to confinement needed for transportation. Many owners may not know where to take their dogs. 589 Page 181 of 265 Survey Question #28c: If yes, what would you do with your pet(s) during an evacuation? Please select the best answer. Note: Online, this question was only presented to respondents who indicated that they have at least one pet. In the hardcopy survey, respondents who indicated they did not have a pet were instructed to skip #28a, #28b, #28c, and #28d. Figure 10.1.7: 2016 Pet Evacuation Actions (All Survey Responses: n= 958) Figure 10.1.8: 2016 Pet Evacuation Actions (Randomized Mailing: n= 224) 5% 78% 3% 2% 1% 2% 5% 4% 1% 1% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90% Stay behind with them Take them to our destination with us Leave them at home Board them Leave them with a friend Leave some, take some Do not know Not applicable; I would not evacuate Other (please specify) Percent 8% 71% 5% 1% 0% 5% 7% 1% 1% 0% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80% Stay behind with them Take them to our destination with us Leave them at home Board them Leave them with a friend Leave some, take some Do not know Not applicable; I would not evacuate Other (please specify) Percent 590 Page 182 of 265 Figure 10.1.9: 2014 Pet Evacuation Actions (n=1,110) Open-ended Response Summary: Most respondents indicated they would take their pet(s) with them during an evacuation, or remain at the house with their pet(s) if they could not evacuate with them. A few respondents indicated that they may take some pets and leave others (for example, take the dog but leave the fish tank). 11% 70% 2% 8% 2% 1% 1% 4% 1% 0% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80% Stay behind with them Take them to our destination with us Leave them at home Board them Leave them with a friend Leave some, take some Do Not Know Not applicable; I would not evacuate Other (please specify) Percent Comparative Analysis: National Trends and Findings  In one study, over 50% of pet owners would consider defying authorities during a disaster and would stay with their pets if not allowed to evacuate with them (DVMNews, 2006).  According to some studies, animal owners have greater difficulty finding emergency accommodations than do households without animals. As a result, about 10% of households with animals will stay in their vehicles or at campgrounds (Heath, 1999; Heath et al, 2001)  Approximately 50-70% of those who leave their pets behind will attempt to rescue them later (Hall et al, 2004).  “Pet ownership is an important impediment to evacuation. Pets can be a catalyst in premature return-entry by some or all of the household should the pet be left during the evacuation. They can also reduce compliance rates with mandatory evacuations by an a verage of 2–3%. This represents a small but important number of nonevacuees, many of whom could be elderly residents” (Bowser and Cutter, 2015). 591 Page 183 of 265 Survey Question #28d: If yes, are you aware that Miami-Dade County has a Pet- Friendly Evacuation Center? (Note: A link for more information about the County’s Pet-Friendly Evacuation Center is provided at the end of the survey) Note: Online, this question was only presented to respondents who indicated that they have at least one pet. In the hardcopy survey, respondents who indicated they did not have a pet were instructed to skip #28a, #28b, #28c, and #28d. Figure 10.1.10: 2016 Pet-Friendly Hurricane Evacuation Center (All Survey Responses: n= 939) Figure 10.1.11: 2016 Pet-Friendly Hurricane Evacuation Center (Randomized Mailing: n= 214) 52% 34% 12% 2% Yes No Do not know Not applicable 44% 36% 19% 1% Yes No Do not know Not applicable 592 Page 184 of 265 Figure 10.1.12: 2014 Pet-Friendly Hurricane Evacuation Center (n=1,100) 54% 35% 10% 1% Yes No Do not know Not applicable Comparative Analysis: National Trends and Findings  Owning pets is considered to be the most significant reason why households without children fail to evacuate (Heath, 1999; Heath et al, 2001).  For every additional dog or cat owned, such households are nearly twice as likely to fail to evacuate compared with pet-owning households with children (Heath et al, 2001).  One study found that dog owners have an increased risk of evacuation failure due to logistical difficulties (Heath et al, 2001). This is especially true for “outdoor dogs”, which may be less tolerant to confinement needed for transportation. Many owners may not know where to take their dogs.  The same study found that pet owners are less likely to evacuate if they do not have animal carriers. This is especially true for cats (Heath et al, 2001).  Some studies suggest pet owners would be willing to risk their lives to save their pets (Hall et al, 2004; Heath et al, 2001).  According to one study, over 50% of pet owners are not aware of or have a list of hotels or other facilities that accommodate pets (DVMNews, 2006). 593 Page 185 of 265 10.2 Observations & Considerations Pet ownership has remained relatively consistent, with a slight decrease (50% of respondents owned a pet in 2016 compared to 56% in 2014) (Figure 10.1.1). Three quarters of pet owners in Miami-Dade County own at least 1 dog. Cat ownership among respondents with pets decreased slightly from 42% in 2014 to 36% in 2016 while “other” pet ownership increased from 15% to 20% (Figure 10.1.4). “Other” pets include birds, fish, rabbits, and tortoises/turtles. Other common pets included guinea pigs, hamsters, bearded dragons, and snakes. Some respondents indicated they had farm animals, such as chickens, horses, and livestock. Of those who own dogs and/or cats, nearly 80% own only one or two dogs and/or cats. However, of the respondents who owned an “other” animal, 5% owned between 21 and 80 pets. Of the 2,581 pets referenced in the survey, 44% were dogs, 29% were cats, and 28% were another type of animal. Therefore, Miami-Dade County can assume that most pet owners will have dogs and/or cats, but there is still a sizeable number of pets who may need shelter and/or assistance that are not dogs or cats. Fewer respondents in 2016 indicated they would stay at home with their pets (5% in 2016 vs. 11% in 2014) and more respondents indicated that the y would bring their pets with them to their destination (78% in 2016 vs.70% in 2014). Five percent (5%) of pet- owning respondents indicated they were planning to bring their pets to a Miami -Dade County Pet Friendly Evacuation Center (PFEC) (compared to 8% in 2014) (Figure 10.1.7). Based on the county’s 2015 American Community Survey 5-Year population estimate of 2,639,042, if 50% of the population owns a pet and 5% of the pet -owning population is planning to bring their pet to a PFEC, Miami-Dade County could potentially have 65,976 clients looking to use the PFEC.  2015 ACS 5-Year Population Estimate: 2,639,042 o Half of Population (Pet Owners): 1,319,521  5% of Pet Owning Population: 65,976 Awareness of the PFECs remains similar (54% of pet-owning respondents in 2014 vs. 52% in 2016) (Figure 10.1.10). 594 Page 186 of 265 11. HOUSEHOLDS 595 Page 187 of 265 11 HOUSEHOLDS 11.1 Data The section provides household information of those residents in the county that participated in the study. This section describes housing structure, whether or not the respondent owns or rents, and a number of other important categories. Survey Question #29: What type of structure do you live in? Table 11.1: Type of Housing Structure (All Survey Responses: n= 1,926) Type of Structure Percent Detached single family home 62% Duplex, triplex, quadruple home 8% Multi-family building 4 stories or less (apartment/condo) 15% Multi-family building more than 4 stories (apartment/condo) 11% Mobile home 0% Manufactured home 1% Boat 0% Some other type of structure 1% Do not know 0% Not applicable 0% Other (please specify) 2% Table 11.2: Type of Housing Structure (Random Sample: n= 496) Type of Structure Percent Detached single family home 62% Duplex, triplex, quadruple home 8% Multi-family building 4 stories or less (apartment/condo) 13% Multi-family building more than 4 stories (apartment/condo) 15% Manufactured home 1% Some other type of structure 0% Do not know 0% Not applicable 0% Other (please specify) 1% Open-ended Response Summary: Overwhelming, those who provided a written response live in townhomes. A few lived in houses or Assisted Living Facilities. A couple lived in a condo, apartment, or were homeless and either lived in a shelter or on the street. One respondent lived in a dorm room. 596 Page 188 of 265 Survey Question #30: In what year was your place of residence built? Table 11.3: Year Residence Was Built (All Survey Responses: n= 1,926) Year Place of Residence was Built Percent Before 1994 62% Between 1994 and 2002 12% After 2002 13% Other (please specify) 4% Do not know 9% Not applicable 0% Table 11.4: Year Residence Was Built (Random Sample: n= 499) Year Place of Residence was Built Percent Before 1994 66% Between 1994 and 2002 10% After 2002 13% Other (please specify) 5% Do not know 6% 597 Page 189 of 265 Survey Question #31: Is your residence located in a FEMA-defined special flood hazard area? Table 11.5: Residence Located in a FEMA-defined Flood Hazard Area (All Survey Responses: n= 1,909) FEMA-defined flood hazard area Percent Yes 26% No 32% Do not know 42% Not applicable 1% Table 11.6: Residence Located in a FEMA-defined Flood Hazard Area (Random Sample: n= 491) FEMA-defined flood hazard area Percent Yes 28% No 30% Do not know 41% Not applicable 1% Figure 11.1: Awareness of Residence in FEMA-defined Flood Hazard Area by Owner vs. Renter* (Own n=1,395; Rent n=473) *Note: Respondents who selected any answer other than own or rent were not included in the chart above (for a total of 52 excluded responses out of 1,920). 30% 15% 39% 14% 31% 70% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Own Rent Yes No Do not know Not applicable 598 Page 190 of 265 Survey Question #32: Do you own or rent your home/place of residence? Table 11.7: Own or Rent Residence (All Survey Responses: n= 1,923) Own or Rent Percent Own 73% Rent 25% Other (please specify) 1% Do not know 1% Not applicable 2% Table 11.8: Own or Rent Residence (Random Sample: n= 499) Own or Rent Percent Own 83% Rent 15% Other (please specify) 1% Do not know 0% Not applicable 1% Figure 11.2: Preparedness Activities by Owner vs. Renter* (Own n=1,395; Rent n=473) *Note: Responders who selected any answer other than own or rent were not included in the chart above (for a total of 53 excluded responses out of 1,923). 38% 56% 60% 41% 29% 39% 27% 33% 73% 69% 5% 38% 14% 12% 34% 31% 28% 32% 37% 39% 34% 7% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80% An emergency preparedness plan Flood insurance Windstorm insurance A disaster supply kit An evacuation plan A weather radio Signed up for Miami-Dade Alerts Visited local government web site(s) for emergency preparedness information Adequate materials to protect my home/residence from storms and hurricanes (i.e. hurricane shutters, impact windows and… Homeowners or renter’s insurance for place of residence Other (please specify) Own Rent 599 Page 191 of 265 Figure 11.3: Likelihood to Evacuate Following an Evacuation Ordered by Public Safety Officials by Owner vs. Renter* (Own n=1,389; Rent n=473) *Note: Responders who selected any answer other than own or rent were not incl uded in the chart above (for a total of 53 excluded responses out of 1,915). Figure 11.4: Actual Storm Surge Zones by Owner vs. Renter* (Own n=707; Rent n=237) *Note: Respondents who selected any answer other than own or rent were not included in the chart above as well as respondents who did not provide an address or provided 65% 24% 9% 1% 73% 21% 4% 2% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80% Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Likely Do not know Own Rent 5% 5% 14% 26% 13% 12% 33% 24% 17% 18% 17% 16% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Own Rent A B C D E Outside Zones 600 Page 192 of 265 an unusable address (50 non-owners or renters and 865 unusable or missing addresses). 11.2 Observations The majority of respondents live in detached, single family homes (62%) (Table 11.1) and were built before 1994 (62%) (Table 11.3). Nearly three-quarters of respondents owned their homes (Table 11.7). Owners tended to know if they were located in a FEMA-defined Flood Hazard Area more than renters, however 31% of owners still did not know if they were in a FEMA-defined Flood Hazard Area (Figure 11.1). Some preparedness activities were just as likely to be completed by owners and renters, but homeowners were more likely to have flood, windstorm, and homeowner’s insurance as well as adequate materials to protect their home or residence (homeowner’s insurance was equated to renters insurance in the survey) (Figure 11.2). Renters tended to be somewhat more likely to evacuate following an evacuation order than homeowners (Figure 11.3). There tended to be more renters in Storm Surge Zone B and more owners in Storm Surge Zone D. The rest of the Storm Surge Zones had relatively similar owner/renter rates (Figure 11.4). 601 Page 193 of 265 Page Intentionally Left Blank 602 Page 194 of 265 12. DEMOGRAPHICS 603 Page 195 of 265 12 DEMOGRAPHICS The section provides key demographics of those residents in the county that participated in the study. This section describes the characteristics of the survey population, such as: residency status, location/zip code, age, gender, race/ethnicity, language spoken in household, education level, and a number of other important categories. Survey Question #2: Do you live in Miami-Dade County on a full-time basis year- round? Table 12.1: Residency Status (All Survey Responses: 1,950) Do you live in Miami-Dade County on a full-time basis year-round? Percent Yes 99% No 1% Do not know 0% Table 12.2: Residency Status (Random Sample: n= 505) Do you live in Miami-Dade County on a full-time basis year-round? Percent Yes 99% No 1% Do not know 0% Survey Question #2a: If no, at what times of the year do you live in Miami-Dade County? Select ALL that apply. Note: Online, this question was only presented to respondents who indicated that they did not live in Miami-Dade County on a full-time basis year-round. In the hardcopy survey, respondents who indicated they lived in Miami-Dade County on a full-time basis year-round were instructed to skip #2a. Table 12.3: Seasonal Part-time Residents in Miami-Dade County (All Survey Responses: n= 18) If you don’t live in Miami-Dade full-time, at what times of the year do you live in Miami-Dade County? Percent Winter 44% Spring 61% Summer 72% Fall 44% Table 12.4: Seasonal Part-time Residents in Miami-Dade County (Random Sample: n= 4) If you don’t live in Miami-Dade full-time, at what times of the year do you live in Miami-Dade County? Percent Winter 75% Spring 100% Summer 50% Fall 50% 604 Page 196 of 265 Survey Question #3: Approximately how many years have you lived either full- time or part-time in Miami-Dade County? Table 12.5: Residency Status: Number of years living in Miami-Dade County (All Survey Responses: n= 1,942) Number of Years in Miami-Dade County Percent 0 - 2 Years 5% 3 - 5 Years 5% 6 - 10 Years 6% 11 - 20 Years 15% 21 or more years 69% Do not know 0% Table 12.6: Residency Status: Number of years living in Miami-Dade County (Randomized Mailing: n= 493) Number of Years in Miami-Dade County Percent 0 - 2 Years 3% 3 - 5 Years 5% 6 - 10 Years 7% 11 - 20 Years 16% 21 or more years 69% 605 Page 197 of 265 Survey Question #4: What is your zip code? Table 12.7: Zip Code of Respondents (All Survey Responses: n= 1,694) Zip code Percent Zip code Percent 33010 1% 33147 2% 33012 1% 33149 0% 33013 0% 33150 1% 33014 1% 33154 1% 33015 3% 33155 2% 33016 1% 33156 3% 33018 1% 33157 6% 33030 1% 33158 1% 33031 1% 33160 1% 33032 2% 33161 2% 33033 2% 33162 1% 33034 0% 33165 2% 33035 1% 33166 1% 33054 1% 33167 1% 33055 1% 33168 1% 33056 1% 33169 3% 33122 0% 33170 1% 33125 1% 33172 1% 33126 1% 33173 2% 33127 1% 33174 1% 33128 0% 33175 2% 33129 1% 33176 4% 33130 1% 33177 2% 33131 2% 33178 2% 33132 0% 33179 2% 33133 2% 33180 1% 33134 2% 33181 1% 33135 1% 33182 1% 33136 1% 33183 2% 33137 1% 33184 1% 33138 1% 33185 1% 33139 2% 33186 4% 33140 1% 33187 1% 33141 1% 33189 2% 33142 1% 33190 1% 33143 2% 33193 1% 33144 1% 33194 0% 33145 2% 33196 2% 33146 1% Other 0% 606 Page 198 of 265 Table 12.8: Zip Code of Respondents (Randomized Mailing: n= 477) Zip code Percent Zip code Percent 33010 1% 33149 0% 33012 1% 33150 0% 33013 1% 33154 1% 33014 1% 33155 2% 33015 3% 33156 4% 33016 1% 33157 3% 33018 1% 33158 2% 33030 1% 33160 1% 33031 0% 33161 1% 33032 1% 33162 1% 33033 2% 33165 2% 33035 2% 33166 1% 33054 1% 33167 1% 33055 2% 33168 1% 33056 0% 33169 1% 33125 1% 33170 1% 33126 1% 33172 1% 33127 1% 33173 1% 33129 1% 33174 2% 33130 0% 33175 4% 33131 1% 33176 3% 33133 2% 33177 1% 33134 3% 33178 2% 33135 0% 33179 3% 33136 1% 33180 3% 33137 0% 33181 0% 33138 3% 33182 1% 33139 4% 33183 2% 33140 1% 33184 0% 33141 2% 33185 1% 33142 1% 33186 3% 33143 3% 33187 1% 33144 1% 33189 2% 33145 1% 33193 0% 33146 0% 33194 0% 33147 3% 33196 2% 607 Page 199 of 265 Survey Question #34: Which of the following best describes your race/ethnicity? Select ALL that apply. Table 12.9: Race/Ethnicity (All Survey Responses: n= 1,913) Race/Ethnicity Percent Black African American 13% Black Hispanic 3% Black Other (i.e. Haitian, Other West Indies) 4% White Non-Hispanic 30% White Hispanic 53% Far East Asian (i.e. Chinese, Korean) 2% South Asian (i.e. Indian, Pakistani) 1% Pacific Islander 1% American Indian or Alaska Native 1% Other (please specify) 4% Table 12.10: Race/Ethnicity (Randomized Mailing: n= 493) Race/Ethnicity Percent Black African American 10% Black Hispanic 3% Black Other (i.e. Haitian, Other West Indies) 2% White Non-Hispanic 37% White Hispanic 53% Far East Asian (i.e. Chinese, Korean) 1% South Asian (i.e. Indian, Pakistani) 0% American Indian or Alaska Native 1% Other (please specify) 4% Open-ended Response Summary: As would be expected in an extremely diverse place such as Miami-Dade County, there were many races and ethnicities identified in the written response option. Most who selected this response indicated that they were biracial. Respondents also indicated races and ethnicities from all across the world, including but not limited to Cuban, Brazilian, Filipino, Guyanese, Italian, Iranian, and Russian. Table 12.11: Race/Ethnicity in Miami-Dade County Race/Ethnicity 2015 ACS 5-Year White 76% Black or African American alone 19% American Indian and Alaska Native alone 0% Asian alone 2% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 0% Other 3% Source: B02001 RACE 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (Categories adopted from ACS) 608 Page 200 of 265 Survey Question #35: Please indicate the language(s) spoken in your household. Select ALL that apply. Table 12.12: Language(s) Spoken in Household (All Survey Responses: n= 1,925) Language(s) Spoken in Household Percent English 93% Spanish 55% Haitian Creole 3% French 3% Other (please specify) 5% *Note: Of all respondents, 186 did not select English as a language spoken in the household. Eighty three percent (83%) of those households spoke Spanish, 7% spoke Haitian-Creole, 1% spoke French, and 11% spoke another language (to include Russian, Bulgarian, German, Italian, Portuguese, Serbian, Tagalog, Arabic, and Broken English (African))/ Table 12.13: Language(s) Spoken in Household (Randomized Mailing: n= 500) Language(s) Spoken in Household Percent English 90% Spanish 57% Haitian Creole 2% French 3% Other (please specify) 5% Open-ended Response Summary: Most of those who indicated they spoke a different language than those provided speak Portuguese. Many spoke Italian or German. Some spoke Tagalog, Chinese, or Russian. There were also many other languages identified from all regions of the world, including but not limited to Dutch, Arabic, Polish, Urdu, Farsi, and Serbian. Table 12.14: Language(s) Spoken in Household (American Community Survey) Language(s) Spoken in Household 2015 ACS 5-Year Speaks only English 27% Speak a language other than English 73% Spanish 64% Other Indo-European languages 7% Asian and Pacific Island languages 1% Other languages 1% Source: S1601 LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Note: The methodology for measuring language spoken within the household are different between the ACS & the Miami-Dade County survey. The Miami-Dade County survey allowed respondents to select multiple languages; therefore, the 27% that speaks only English as measured by the ACS is included within the 93% that speak English in the Miami-Dade County survey. 609 Page 201 of 265 Survey Question #36: Which of the following best describes your employment? Table 12.15: Respondent Employment (All Survey Responses: n= 1,912) Employment Type Percent Construction 2% Agriculture and Landscaping 1% Manufacturing 1% Wholesale Trade 1% Hospitality Services & Tourism 2% University Student 2% Retail and consumer services 2% Transportation 1% Utilities 2% Professional, financial, or IT services 10% Education 5% Healthcare 9% Government 39% Military 0% Stay-at-home parent/Caretaker 1% Retired 13% Unemployed 2% Do not know 1% Other (please specify) 8% Table 12.16: Respondent Employment (Randomized Mailing: n= 496) Employment Type Percent Construction 3% Agriculture and Landscaping 0% Manufacturing 2% Wholesale Trade 1% Hospitality Services & Tourism 3% University Student 1% Retail and consumer services 5% Transportation 3% Utilities 0% Professional, financial, or IT services 15% Education 5% Healthcare 7% Government 3% Military 0% Stay-at-home parent/Caretaker 1% Retired 38% Unemployed 2% Do not know 0% Other (please specify) 10% 610 Page 202 of 265 Table 12.17: County Resident Employment (American Community Survey) Employment Type Percent Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining 1% Construction 7% Manufacturing 5% Wholesale trade 4% Retail trade 13% Transportation and warehousing, and utilities 7% Information 2% Finance and insurance, and real estate and rental and leasing 7% Professional, scientific, and management, and administrative and waste management services 13% Educational services, and health care and social assistance 20% Arts, entertainment, and recreation, and accommodation and food services 11% Other services, except public administration 6% Public administration 4% Source: C24050 INDUSTRY BY OCCUPATION FOR THE CIVILIAN EMPLOYED POPULATION 16 YEARS AND OVER 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates 611 Page 203 of 265 Survey Question #37: Which category best describes your education level? Table 12.18: Respondent Education (All Survey Responses: n= 1,914) Education Level Percent Some high school 2% High school graduate 9% Some college 22% College graduate 38% Post graduate 28% Do not know 0% Not applicable 1% Table 12.19: Respondent Education (Randomized Mailing: n= 497) Education Level Percent Some high school 5% High school graduate 11% Some college 23% College graduate 32% Post graduate 26% Do not know 0% Not applicable 2% Table 12.20: County Resident Education (American Community Survey) Education Level Percent Population 18 to 24 years (X) Less than high school graduate 15% High school graduate (includes equivalency) 29% Some college or associate's degree 47% Bachelor's degree or higher 9% Population 25 years and over (X) Less than 9th grade 11% 9th to 12th grade, no diploma 9% High school graduate (includes equivalency) 28% Some college, no degree 16% Associate's degree 9% Bachelor's degree 17% Graduate or professional degree 10% Source: S1501 EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates 612 Page 204 of 265 Survey Question #38: Please indicate your sex. Table 12.21: Respondent Sex (All Survey Responses: n= 1,893) Sex of Respondents Percent Female 58% Male 41% Other 1% Table 12.22: Respondent Sex (Randomized Mailing: n= 498) Sex of Respondents Percent Female 51% Male 49% Table 12.23: County Resident Sex Sex of Respondents Percent Female 51% Male 49% Source: S0101 AGE AND SEX 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates 613 Page 205 of 265 Survey Question #39: Please indicate your age. Table 12.24: Respondent Age (All Survey Responses: n= 1,924) Age of Respondents Percent 16 - 19 0% 20 - 24 3% 25 - 34 12% 35 - 49 29% 50 - 64 38% 65 - 74 11% 75 - 79 3% 80 or older 4% Not applicable 1% Table 12.25: Respondent Age (Randomized Mailing: n= 498) Age of Respondents Percent 16 - 19 0% 20 - 24 0% 25 - 34 7% 35 - 49 18% 50 - 64 31% 65 - 74 26% 75 - 79 9% 80 or older 10% Table 12.26: County Resident Age (American Community Survey) Age of Respondents Original ACS Percent Adjusted ACS Percent* 15 - 19 6% 7% 20 - 24 7% 8% 25 - 34 14% 17% 35 - 49 22% 27% 50 - 64 19% 23% 65 - 74 8% 10% 75 - 79 3% 3% 80 or older 4% 5% Source: S0101 AGE AND SEX 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates *Note: The Original ACS data shown above references data covering all residents in Miami-Dade County, including those younger than 15. The Miami-Dade County survey was only open to residents 16 years o ld and above. The adjusted ACS percent references the age category percent when only considering county residents older than 15. 614 Page 206 of 265 Survey Question #40: Which of the following ranges best describes your total household income? Table 12.27: Household Income (All Survey Responses: n= 1,877) Household Income Percent $14,999 or less 5% $15,000 to $24,999 5% $25,000 to $39,999 10% $40,000 to $79,999 29% $80,000 to $99,999 14% $100,000 or more 28% Do not know 4% Not applicable 6% Table 12.28: Household Income (Randomized Mailing: n= 478) Household Income Percent $14,999 or less 7% $15,000 to $24,999 10% $25,000 to $39,999 13% $40,000 to $79,999 27% $80,000 to $99,999 10% $100,000 or more 24% Do not know 3% Not applicable 6% Table 12.29: County Household Income (American Community Survey) Household Income Percent $14,999 or less* 17% $15,000 to $24,999 13% $25,000 to $34,999 11% $35,000 to $49,999 14% $50,000 to $74,999 16% $75,000 to $99,999 10% $100,000 or more* 18% Source: S1901 INCOME IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS (IN 2015 INFLATION -ADJUSTED DOLLARS) 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates *Note: The lowest and highest income categories in the ACS were combined to allow for a closer comparison to the Miami-Dade County survey data. In the ACS, there are “Less than $10,000” and “$10,000 to $14,999” categories and “$100,000 to $149,999”, “$150,000 to $199,999”, and $200,000 or more” categories. 615 Page 207 of 265 Page Intentionally Left Blank 616 Page 208 of 265 13. REFERENCES 617 Page 209 of 265 13 REFERENCES AARP Public Policy Institute. (2006). We Can Do Better: Lessons Learned for Protecting Older Persons in Disasters, http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/il/better.pdf Aguirre, B. E., W. A. Anderson, S. Balandran, B. E. Peters, H. Max White. (1991). The Saragosa, Texas Tornado May 22, 1987. National Disaster Review. American Veterinary Medical Association. (2010). Emergency preparedness and response. Arlikatti, S., M.K. Lindell, C.S. Prater, & Y. Zhang (2006). “Risk Area Accuracy and Hurricane Evacuation Expectations of Coastal Residents.” Environment and Behavior, 38(2): 226-247. Baker E.J. (1991) Hurricane evacuation behavior. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 9: 287–310. Benson, W. F., & Aldrich, N. (2007). CDC’s disaster planning goal: Protect vulnerable older adults. Washington, DC: CDC Healthy Aging Program. Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities’ Emergency Management (CCDEM) Task Force. Association of University Centers on Disability. (2006). Decker, S. M., Lord, L. K., Walker, W. L. & Wittum, T. E. (2010). Emergency and disaster planning at Ohio animal shelters. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 13, 66-76. Drabek T.E. (1970) Laboratory Simulation of a Police Communication System under Stress. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Disaster Research Center. Drabek T.E. (1986) Human System Responses to Disaster: An Inventory of Sociological Findings. New York: Springer-Verlag. Drabek, T. and Stephenson, J. (1971). "When Disaster Strikes." Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1 (1971): 187-203 DVMNews. (2006). AKC survey says owners would defy evacuation to stay with pets. Retrieved May 2011, from http://veterinarynews.dvm360.com/. Edmonds, A. S., & Cutter, S. L. (2008). Planning for pet evacuation during disasters. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 5(1), 1-18. Fothergill, A., Maestas, E. G., & Darlington, J. D. (1999). Race, ethnicity and disasters in the United States: A review of the literature. Disasters , 23 (2), 156-173. 618 Page 210 of 265 Gladwin, Hugh and Walter Gillis Peacock. (1997). "Warning and Evacuation: A Night for Hard Houses." In Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Gender and Sociology of Disasters. London: Routledge, 1997: 52-74. Hall, M. J., N.G., Anthony, Ursang, R. J., Holloway, H., Fullerton, C., & Casper, J. (2004). Psychological impact of the animal-human bond in disaster preparedness and response. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 10(6), 368-374. Heath, S. E. (1999). Animal management in disasters. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, Inc Heath S. (2001). American Journal of Epidemiology (“Human and Pet-Related Risk Factors for Household Evacuation Failure during a Natural Disaster”), http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/153/7/659 Heath, S. E., Kass, P. H., Beck, A. M., & Glickman, L. T. (2001). Human and pet -related risk factors for household evacuation failure during a natural disaster. American Journal of Epidemiology, 153(7), 659-665. Irvine, L. (2004). Providing for pets during disasters: An exploratory study. Natural Hazards Center, Quick Response Research Report 171. Kaiser Family Foundation. (2005). Survey of Hurricane Katrina Evacuees, http://www.kff.org/newsmedia/upload/7401.pdf James, X., Hawkins, A., & Rowel, R. (2007). An assessment of the cultural appropriateness of emergency preparedness communication for low income minorities. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management , 4 (3), 1-24. Leonard, H. A., & Scammon, D. L. (2007). No p et left behind: Accommodating pets in emergency planning. American Marketing Association, 26(1), 49 -53. Lindell MK and Perry RW (1987) Warning mechanisms in emergency response systems. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 5: 137–153. Lindell M.K. and Perry R.W. (1992) Behavioral Foundations of Community Emergency Planning. Washington, DC: Hemisphere. Lindell MK and Perry RW (2004) Communicating Environmental Risk in Multiethnic Communities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Mileti D.S. and Beck E. (1975) Communication in crisis. Communication Research 2: 24–49. Paton, D., & Johnson, D. (2001). Disasters and communities:vulnerability, resilience and preparedness. Disaster Prevention and Management , 10 (4), 270-277. 619 Page 211 of 265 Perry, R. W., & Green, M. R. (1982). The role of ethnicity in the emergency decision- making process. Sociological Inquiry , 52 (4), 306-334. Perry, R. W., & Lindell, M. K. (1991). Effects of ethnicity on evacuation decision -making. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 9(1), 47-68. Perry, R. W., & Lindell, M. K. (2003). Preparedness for emergency response: Guidelines for the emergency planning process. Disasters , 27 (3), 336-350. Perry, R. W., Lindell, M. K., & Greene, M. R. (1982). Crisis communications: Ethn ic differentials in interpreting and acting on disaster warnings. Social Behavior and Personality, 10(1), 97-104. Sorensen JH (2000) Hazard warning systems: Review of 20 years of progress. Natural Hazards Review 1: 119–125. Windham, G.O., Posey, E.I., Ross P.J., Spencer B.G. (1977). Reactions to Storm Threat During Hurricane Eloise, report 51.Mississppi State University: Social Science Research Center. Zhang, Y., C.S. Prater, & M.K. Lindell (2004) “Risk Area Accuracy and Hurricane Evacuation from Hurricane Bret.” Natural Hazards Review, 5 (3): 115-120. Zottarelli, L. K. (2010). Broken bond: An exploration of human factors associated with companion animal loss during Hurricane Katrina. Sociological Forum, 25(1), 110-122. 620 Page 212 of 265 14. APPENDICES 621 Page 213 of 265 APPENDIX A: OPEN ENDED QUESTIONS Note: The following responses have not been edited for grammar and spelling. Question 5. Please indicate those activities your household has done to prepare for emergencies and disasters (only “other” answers are displayed here). Alerts & Apps (8)  I get Alerts on the TV  Red Cross Emergency App  Red cross Emmergency ap  registered at the Miami-Dade Emergency Managemente for handicap  signed up for NHC alerts and TWC  we monitor nhc.noaa.gov; we are not in a flood zone or an evacuation zone. Have been through Andrew and all subsequent storms.  Weather app for alerts  weather phone app Group Living (6)  Assisted Living Facility Emergency Plan Updated Annually  hospice  I live in an apartment  I live in government building  i live on campus at barry university  live in dorms Home Improvements (39)  Accordian Shutters  Automatic standby generator  backup electricity  Emergency generator  emergency panel to be used with a gas operated generator  gas generator  Gates around the house  generator  Generator  generator  Generator  generator  generator  generator  generator  generator  generator 622 Page 214 of 265  generator  Generator (full house)  Generator with fuel  generator, food, water  Generator, gasoline and drinking water and water for others needs  generator, water, food for one week  generator,cash,water,plywood  generator/supplies  Home built with higher elevation and impact glass throughout  Hurricane proof garage dr  In the process of getting impact windows and doors  INSTALLED IMPACT WINDOWS & DOORS  Portable Generator  prepared my home\'s generator  Purchased Emergency Generator  Purchsed standby power and accessories, water storage, etc.  safe room  Storm shutters  storm windows  storms shuters  Whole House Generator  Windows and doors antihurrianes Insurance (3)  condo insurance  lives in condo which has flood insurance. Have water, batteries, lanterns and flashlights, food.  We are forced to have flood insurance even when we do not need it None (17)  Currently at airbnb home that is in no way prepared.  homeless  homeless  n/a  na  Newly moved to the area so in the process of doing these things  no home insurance  none  none  none  none  none  none of the above  nothing 623 Page 215 of 265  nothing  Nothing  nothing yet Planning (5)  Get emergency preparedness information from HR.  Have the pets travel ready also.  I have ER Prep plan info  I wish that MDC would give me more information about what to expect and put major storm information on the front page of the web site.  plans for our pets Supplies (25)  2 week supply of food for people & pets, water containers, barbeque grill, generator, solar cell phone charger  drinking water  Emergency water and beer supply  extra food  extra food  extra water and gasoline  flash lights, lamps, first aid kit  food  Food and water Supply  food stockpile  food supplies, water  food, flashlight, radio, batteries, water  food/water 7 days  Gas, personal paperwork, cash, emergency back, etc.  Keep and rotate a stock of water and none perishable food supplies as well as updated medicines  lanterns, food, storm supplies  linternas  Medications  replenish water supply per person; battery-powered lamp; canned food supply;  supplies from years before and contacts too help...  tape windows  water storage jugs ready  water, animal shelter, trimmed trees, tied down sailboat  water, candles coleman stove matches and power bank  water, food, flashlight etc Training/Experience (3)  ex-marine trained tactics  Ham operator with oem 624 Page 216 of 265  lived experience Catch All (11)  All  Homeowners  how do I sign up for Miami-Dade alerts?  I dont know  I live alone in a garage apt  I rent, so I\'m not sure what kind of insurance the owner has.  living in mother\'s residence at the moment-used to live in Miami Beach  renter  traffic  vivo alquilado i no se nada de eso  YOU Question 6. Please indicate what type of device(s) you use to access the internet (only “other” answers are displayed here). Aircard (2)  aircard  company mifi Do not use internet (2)  I do not use computers myself only family members, there are computers with internet service in the home.  I do not use the internet refuse to have my life subjected to it in order to function Phone (2)  phone in my car  satellital phone Public Computer (2)  College Computer  senior citizen center Public Establishments (1)  free wifi dunkin donuts, mcdonalds Smart TV (2)  battery TV  Smart TV Catch All (4)  homeless  housephone 625 Page 217 of 265  Idk  News Radio/TV Question 7. Please indicate how Miami-Dade County can better assist you in preparing for emergencies and disasters (example: provide preparedness materials in my language). Alerts (30)  Alerts via or computer  Atencion telefonica, en caso de alguna duda.  email/txt alerts  I would like to see more TV interruptions and media alerts to keep everyone informed. Miami Dade alerting rather than the news teams.  Issue hourly news updates.  Ley de divulgacion por radio y tv 2 min cada hora durante la temporary. Este material debe ser corto y preciso  mandar sms de emergencia a todos los celulares con 305 o 786  More awareness to public about the safety text alert system  More consistency of eas  Provide emergency management notifications in case of an emergencies for preparedness.  Provide scrolling messages across the TV screen in severe weather so we can understand the threat and how quickly the weather is approaching. This is common in other states with less severe weather patterns.  provide text messages on an hourly basis when a storm is about to hit.  Provide the desired form of communication (US mail, email, text messages, fb) to its residents regarding preparedness. In other words, ask me my preferred communication to receive regular updates and tips, then send. Pre/du ring/post emergencies.  Public Emergency air Siren when storm is in approach.  public service anoouncements in transportation such as personal vehicles or automatic alerts such as AMBER alerts  Radio  radio and public announcements, postings, social media, memos, collaterals  radio TV  Send clearer notifications throughout devices.  send message alerts  Sign up for text alerts  Text alerts???  text me alerts email me alerts  text message notification whenever possible  Text messages and a disaster alert app - perhaps they already have such things.  Una APP para telefono con push notifications  use e-mails for notification and emergency info  use my zip code to tell me if i'm in danger 626 Page 218 of 265  Use text messaging for alerts  Well a county wide alert "CLEARLY" understandable. Access & Functional Needs (6)  Be able to transfer wheelchair people to another place when light is gone and they have to keep inside of the apartment for a whole month while light service is restored  Provide materials for people with hearing problems and disability.  Providing Deaf Interpreters for ALL conferences and events. Not ASL interpreters. two different types. Both should be provided. The Deaf community is growing. Assist the homeless that want help.  Reach out to the elderly or families with elderly to ensure they have what's needed after disaster or at least that they are ok  Referente a noticias (radio y television) de emergencia y desastres naturales, cada vez que se informe a la población el condado debe y es su obligación de tener en cuenta a las personas mudas y sordomudas y siempre contar con traductores para las población que no hablan ingles, la mayoría de las veces las autoridades tratan de hablar e informar en un idioma (como por ejemplo,español) que no dominan y la información no llega clara, ni precisa. Estamos hablando de informar para proteger la vida de todos en momentos como este, creo que se debe prestar mas atención a este detalle vital y tener en cuenta que la fluidez y claridad de lo que se debe transmitir debe ser claro y fidedigno en momentos de emergencia, donde la vida de todos esta en riesgo. Y la población que no tiene acceso o no sabe navegar por el internet estará bien informada?  tener reservA de agua y comida para todos los ALF del CONDADO,plantas moviles electricas y materiales en espanol Doing Well (36)  Awesome  Creemos que el Condado de Miami Dade esta actualizado de las medidas necesarias para contrarestar los efectos de un huracan, lo que pasa es que nosotros somos muy finalista.  do a very good job so I cannot think of anything to add  Doing a great job already  doing good  I believe that since this is a multi-populated city/county that commercial can reflect most ethnicities this community represents. Overall, the county/city is doing a great job by informing this community by either social media/media and radio. concerning  I feel that they are doing a wonderful job through media, flyers in the mail and website.  I think they have cover everything that the public needs, or to know for emergencies and disasters.  I think Miami Dade is completely prepared we learned a lot from Andrew and Wilma and have prepared for any type of emergency. 627 Page 219 of 265  I think Miami Dde county does a great job in informing the opulation about hurricane threats  I think Miami-Dade County has cover all areas in preparing for emergencies and disasters.  I think you all are doing a good job. Thanks for what you do, we appreciate you.  I think you do quite well.  In my opinion every things are very good .  IS PERFECT  Keep up the excellent work.  Miami Dade County already has prepared me with information regarding emergencies and disasters awareness regarding a Hurricane . Miami Dade County has covered all subjects to be prepared. Survival, shleters to go to, Preparing home for Hurricane, animal shelters, , shelte rs where you can go if needed. Health medication that is needed to be prepared. I think Miami Dade has covered all areas to make our county aware and prepared and I thank you.  Miami Dade county does a fine job at making us aware of what's going on and preparing us for the worst situations  Miami Dade County has provided excellent service in the past. I am not sure what the County has in place in event of total shut down of all technologies  Miami dade county is great in disaster preparedness materials  Miami-Dade County does a very good job.  Miami-Dade County does an excellent job preparing for emergencies.  Miami-Dade County is doing excellent job at keeping everyone aware.  Miami-Dade County is very prepared and is doing a great job of informing the public. The public needs to pay attention and not wait until the last minute to start making preparations.  Miami-Dade provides the necessary information we need to be prepared.  My family is very satisfied with the materials that Miami Dade County had made available to us.  No comments at this time. Miami-Dade County provides all the necesary information reqired to be well prepared for any possible emergengy/evacuation.  Not sure. I believe that they are doing a good job of communication the required information when necessary.  The county and government is doing a good job specially after the disaster.  they are doing a great job  They are doing everything possible in my opinion  They do a fine job as it is and the issue is people don't prepare enough and expect the government to come to their aid immediately after a hurricane with essential; e.g., water, ice, etc.  we are very pleased with the services provide by Roberto Cepeda representative from your dept.  When preparing its emergency plan, Sunflowers Village ALF, Inc. has always received prompt, precise and accurate assistance when requested. Mr. Cepeda is an asset to your organization because of his knowledge and customer service. 628 Page 220 of 265  You are doing an excellent job. I can sleep at nights peacefully knowing that I live in a county that has so many resources  You are doing well. Employee Concerns (15)  Allowing employees to go home with ample time so they too can prepare for emergency. After an emergency, check to see if your own staff is in need of assistance, (how can the county assist their employees who may be struggling through an emergency)  As a County employee...we are required to assist in the event of an emergency. We should receive free disaster kits for our families while we assist other families in our community.  As a state employee, perhaps county should join forces and provide info sessions at state employees' workplace about local services and preparedness.  County employees are required to work disaster assistance, but instructions on location to report to is not always clear. Seems to be a delay in communications from the top down.  county is under staffed in man power,materials. As proven in by Andrew. The county will not get a postive responce they recieved then as someone who worked 18 hrs a day for at least 6 months.  Get More Emergencies staff  I worked at the airport in the office and according to the managment we are all esential and I disagree because I'm disabled and I'm a woman what can I do in my job during a hurracane I understand that after I need to return to work asap but during the hurricane I want to be home with my family. I think that polize need to be change. I understand that they need an emergency respond team before, during and after the hurracane but the office people need to be release as the rest of the county employees.  If anything, more workers.  It would be helpful if government employees were allowed more time off from their regular hours to prepare their homes, rather have to wait to after work or last minute. For example, tropical storm watches & warnings have been up in Dade since yesterday and employees are still required to report to work 8 hours minimum or more if providing essential services. I'll never forgive the county for waiting till the last minute to release employees only hours before Wilma came ashore. It was horrifying driving down 836 in tropical storm gusts trying to get home.  Making sure employees can go home within a reasonable time period if over an hour from home  NOt enough education is done for county employees..  Providing preparedness materials and scheduling obligatory orientation in every places of work I mean the should be obligatory to employers schedule the orientations with the county for employees.  Well the biggest problem w/ Andrew was the "volunteers" that were directing traffic. Why not get volunteers BEFORE the storm and give them the tools they need 629 Page 221 of 265  when a storm is approaching they need to release employees with sufficient time to properly prepare  When the Governor declares a state of emergency, the Mayor of MDC should produce a statement on this website. Your employees and facilities need to know you're thinking about them. They need your guidance and leadership and I do not see one single mention of Hurricane Matthew on this site. It is a public neglect that needs to be corrected. We are looking to you for leadership and yes, breast cancer and pet adoption is important but you are not preparing your county for the potential of a major hurricane and it is a blaring and ridiculous failure. Flood Concerns (16)  (81 yr old mother cannot be high up) My complex f loods enormously just during rain, I was flooded out of Apt #131 in 2013 lost everything, Miami Dade must make law for all complexes, all apartments on 1st floor needs to have sandbags available in case of flooding, at least, can protect until you get assistance.  being prepared and open all cannels to avoid flooding,  better drainage in area around my home  Better planning/placement of dwellings, healthcare facilities, roadways, gas stations, waste facilities,etc. Many areas of Miami-Dade will be under tidal surge.......  Better water drainage system in the 33165 area. With regular storms the streets are flooded into driveways and hazardous. I am not sure how anyone would get out safely during a hurricane.  During heavy rain storms, we have serious flooding. In the past, we experienced 21 inches. We tried to hook up to the city pipes (we live in Pepperwood), but that failed.  Fix drainage to prevent additional flooding  Flooding is usually what causes the most damage. A review of the waterways and sewer infrastructure is needed so that when we get storms drains are not backed up. Consider that there is a HUGE number of people that don't speak the language to workshops when hurricane season starts would be useful. Don't forget to remind people about the elderly, children and pets as these are the ones that are most likely to need extra help. There is overcrowding of vehicles in our city, a clearer mandate for evacuation should be set so that people that need to evacuate do so at the right times so that we are not ALL out on the street at the same time. A control over the gas prices should also be set with a freeze to prices so that the community is not being harassed by crooked gas station owners.  I live in a flood area (Kendall Drive between 97th and 117)th. Keeping street and storm drains clear is super important year-round, not just in hurricane season.  Make sure all water drains are working properly lake on Little River Drive is clean  Make sure drainage are clean, trees are trimmed. Also, have adequate staff train for disaster awareness with information.  Make sure that storm drains are adequately functioning and not blocked. Make sure that trees on public lands (ROWs and Medians) are properly trimmed and 630 Page 222 of 265 hurricane ready. Ensure that emergency response centers are adequately protected from storm events for effective recovery efforts.  Miami Dade County needs to do a better job of clearing storm sewers, and expanding drainage infrastructures throughout the entire area, not just low-lying.  My community floods very badly during heavy rains. MDC could better assist my area by improving the drainage system. The community is roughly 10 years old with new infrastructure that was installed at that time and has been updated and flooding is still a problem during heavy storms.  Provide better drainage in my immediate area tha is very prone to flooding.  reinforce the County's coastline is reinforced with natural environmental solutions to block storm surge -such as more mangroves and wetlands areas. Make sure the Water & Sewer Dept. has sufficient funding to maintain our county's storm water drains and canal locks have sufficient funding to keep these systems in proper working order. Information (170)  Add news and instruction on TV.  Advertise more about the services (i.e. TV ads, mail distributions, etc.  Advertise the offerings more so that residents know what information is available.  advocate in communities such as door to door face time.  Announce more frequently public preparedness awareness in day and eve ning newscast  appropriate information  As a university student living on campus, it would be great if there could be more communication between the County and the universities. I know there is plenty of education for elementary school students, but many uni versity students come from all over the world and from locations that do not experience hurricanes. For these reasons, college students need to be exposed to hurricane preparedness.  be more visible the month or so before hurricane season begins; community events to remind residents how to prepare and mail-outs or even phone tree messages. many residents here in dade county know when hurricane season begins, but with daily life activities preparing for the storm may go unnoticed until it is actually upon us.  being ready the years before can help for any situation befor next event happens  Better awareness of hurricane preparedness at one site that is easy to access from computer or cellphone  Better publicize tax free shopping days for emergency supplies.  Billboard campaign with websites to visit in case of emergency. I know I can google and find information but in case of extreme emergency where there is no electricity maybe internet etc ... I wouldn't know what to do or where to find information  by creating awareness, videos, and conferences  By email also so I can save it for future. Paper brochures clutter a bit...  By providing all the necessary details of the hurricane shelters. And the location of one nearby our area where we should be seeking shelter f or. 631 Page 223 of 265  by providing brochure  Checklists  Clear english would help with communication.  Communicate through texts or email, provide community with access to such a service. Inform public.  Communicate with all coulters of Dade County  Consistency of message - i.e. county prepares 1 message that is routed to all media channels (radio, tv, whatever may be broadcasting at the time). Perhaps a series of messages grouped by topic would even be helpful (i.e. food, gas, water supply, traffic, damage control, etc.).  constant rehearsals of emergency plans  DADE COUNTY SHOULD VISIT COUNTY CITIZENS TO BETTER INFORM SPECIALY SENIOR CITIZENS.  distribute iformation and make more clear the evacuation zones  Distribution of Emergency preparedness materials mailed to the residents before June 1  don't know how to sign up for alerts, assisting residents who cant afford with affordable shutters, providing assistance with rides, making hurricane supplies tax deductible  easier access to information, have booklets available by mail  Easy website to view info  Emergency Preparedness booklets for residents and/or employees.  Emergency Preparedness information should be announced all year long, not just at the beginning of hurricane season or imminent emergency. More information on what the county will provide: water, shelter, elderly/sick assistance. Maybe host workshops for residents to explain actions that the county will take and on when emergency plans will kick off. Workshops on how to prepare your home, maybe in conjunction with Home Depot and Lowe's. Flood us with information.  Emergency respond classes should be given more often  en la pagina web no pude encontrar un mapa que indique las rutas de evacuacion indicando calles-avenidas-highways que se deberian tomar en caso de inundacion en brickell  Encourage residents to visit the County's website to get emergency information ahead of time, like checklists and guidelines.  Ensure that preparedness materials are made available to centers of government, ex. city halls, in all Miami-Dade Co municipalities.  eso seria muy bueno recibir correspondencia mediante correo de las me didas a tomar en caso de emergencia  flyers for resident and a publicworkshops for elderly and handicapp residents  Give clear, succinct relevant instructions/directions/information in an emergency or disaster - remove the drama  Give me necessary information  give us aureate information about the storm ,shelters , were to find water, ice .  guidance for establishing an emergency preparedness plan 632 Page 224 of 265  Have a Hurricane 101 for new residents/tourists who have yet to experience a hurricane.  Have a live person answer the telephone and respond to specific questions with specific information  Have an almost year round initiative that educates residents on being prepared for any kind of disaster (natural or man made). Don't just wait until hurricane season.  Have Law Enforcement Officers respond to inform the communities, in person or deliver flyers, door hangers, etc.  Have never received any materials on emergency preparedness.  Have staff available during an emergency to provide information for those that do not have access to computer, phone etc.  Help my neighbors be better prepared. Most do not access the resources I do.  Hola: De la misma manera en que llegan propagandas de los mercados y tiendas podrian hacer que nos llegara mas informacion, muchas personas son de una edad abanzada y no tienen acseso a internet o medios para informarse correctamente y en ocaciones no tienen la posibilidad de crear las condiciones correctas, quizas podrian ayudar mas al respecto. gracias  I am subscribed to my neighborhood association's (Coconut Grove - www.vocg.com) email newsletter and I think it would be a great way to contact homeowners and renters in my neighborhood with information. There are not many outreach materials or events where i see emergency information, so this may be a low cost alternative to having to staff a booth or table at city hall meetings or events. Thanks!  I get information primarily by radio  I need information sandbags  I would like to receive a hurricane preparedness guide at home by mail. All households should receive one. All text messages sent during a storm should provide a link to a resources website. We need to understand in case of communications interruptions (no internet access, no phone access, etc...) what are the choices available? County employees could be used as a source to distribute hurricane guides to the community if we only shared a few copies to our inmediate relatives...... so perhaps the first distribution of such resources guide can start with our own County employees (by email as downloadable PDF as well as printed)  I'm OK - but you might want to prepare handouts/info packets and distribute them in schools, libraries, and the like for those who don't know about hurricanes.  Improve pre-disaster prep.Partner with organizations (schools, HOAs, Service groups) to hieghten awareness. Prep for diaster readiness/response beyond weather events.  info booths at local grocery stores  Information needs to be better disseminated throughout the communities, especially low-income, minority ones, and in English, Spanish, and Haitian Creole, at least. 633 Page 225 of 265  Instead of printing packets and leaving them in public places, things like the readiness guide should be mailed to houses  It would be nice to have people come around explain and give flyer  just keep doing what you are doing, keeping the community alert to what is going on  just like they go around for politics should do the same for emergency  Keep us well informed. Provide sandbags.  keeping information simple and transparent without much hype  keeping us informed, giving us steps on what to do in certain circumstances  Know ahead of time where water, ice, etc. will be distributed in case of an emergency or disaster  Las revistas en papel regularmente las tiramos sin leer, para quien no tiene internet es until, pero entrar en el mundo de las redes sociales con informes frescos, oportunos.  Let us know how we can stay informed - for example, I am not aware of the alerts alluded to earlier in the survey but would love to get them.  Let us know when public transportation stops running.  Local News  Mail list and suggestions on preparedness and evacuation routes and plans.  Mail out to homes in storm surge/evacuation zones maps/evacuation plans and contacts in English/Spanish during hurricane season every year - a lot of non- English/uneducated individuals still do not understand the possible pending dangers.  Mail out to the residence saying what to do, How to prepare and where to go to get the items needed to become storm ready or emergency ready. The mail out should include coupons to those who can't afford it.  make it more accessible for elders that may not know how to navigate the internet.  Making information on emergency accessible for everyone.  Making the information readily available to the public, not only via internet as many do not have this kind of access or understand how to use this functionality.  Mantener una seccion activa cuando exista la posibilidad huracanes y/o posibles tormentas tropicales para estar mas informados por medio de nuestro condado  Maps of evacuation routes with 24 hr notice/ that will be supported by the following: LEOS, suspended tolls, traffic mgmt  Maybe a pamphlet in the mail alerting everyone to all of the preparedness resources that are available would help.  maybe send outreach materials as I would not know where to go to look for them.  Maybe set up a public work shop, unless there is one in place already.  MDC CAN PREPARE AN INFO ONLY FACEBOOK PAGE FOR DISASTER INFO - IN ADDITION TO BEING NOTIFIED BY SUPERV OR TEAMS DURING A DISASTER HAM RADIOS COULD BE ISSUED OR OFFERED TO EMPLOYEES AT A DISCOUNT FOR THEIR ER SUPPLY ALLOWING EVERYONE THE OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE COMMUNICATION DURING ANY 634 Page 226 of 265 UNFORESEEN SITUATION. PHONE DIAL IN NUMBER FOR RECORDED UPDATES  Me gustaría recibir un email con instrucciones de procedimiento en caso de hurracones o alguna palestra.  Miami dade County should put more resources and encourage citizens to become part of organizations such as CERT so that in case of a major disaster everybody is ready. These community based teams should receive higher levels of training so that they can be of more assistance to MDFR and MDPD in the event of a major emergency.  Miami Dade Fire in Doral posee informacion gratis de brochure que he obtenido y entregado a todos los residentes de mi ALF, familiares y empleados para tomar conocimento en Emergency Evacuation como deben actuar .Me parece muy oportuno agradecer la posibilidad de obtener los brochures que son muy practicos para el entendimiento de la gente en varias lenguas.  Miami-Dade County should periodically provide pamphlets with all service provided and all emergency contacts need for a safe encounter with a Natural Disaster.  Monitor, inform and warn ahead of disaster.  More accessible information  more awareness ... maybe more radio time or somehow forced education either at supermarkets etc... just pamphlets to the side gets missed by people.  More commercials advising of the resources available and informational inter-net sites.  More community outreach and community awareness. Greater presence is needed, especially during hurricane season.  More frequent public announcements (radio/TV/press) and include the smaller neighborhood (free) papers.  More local community outreach workshops or town hall meetings  More local TV commercials to the community about readiness in emergencies or hurricane  More media info, mail info, seminars  more public outreach through the commercial media  More reading material.  More visible awareness for all, television ads, radio ads, mailers, some type of community outreach for ALL residents of the county. Too many people are oblivion.  More visual advertising. A lot of people specially senior do not have access to thsi information online or dont know how to obtain this information  Natural disasters and acts of violence or terrorism can both cause emergency situations. Use the media to reach out to the public in order to increase public awareness about possible emergency situations Make an emergency preparednes course available to the public for free.  no tengo el listado de refugios en caso de huracanes y no se donde puedo conseguirlo. 635 Page 227 of 265  Overall the city is providing adequate information but my concern is that how will information and services be disseminated and prioritized after an event.  Play more disaster preparedness information on Mami-Dade TV.  Pls publicize and/or communicate a communication channel for smartphones that will be used when an event is on land (not pre-storm preparedness [info is well covered]) how to communicate after the storm.  Post location of distribution stations (in advance) in the event of disaster relief is made available.  Preparedness material easily at hand in government buildings, libraries, county offices and even Dr.'s offices too.  preparedness materials as well as county employee readily available to assist in case of a disaster  Proactive communications in the local media, about preparedness, disaster planning and updates  Provide a list of hotlines in case of emergencies.  provide a place for shelter after evacuation and have pubic transportation especially for eleders and women with children.  Provide adequate information on location of shelters and relief stations, if a hurricane or any disaster affect our community.  Provide an email message with all the checklist items to be filled out and checked off before sending back to Miami-Dade County. I live in City of Homestead and sometimes the lines between local and county municipalities is not clear.  Provide each resident with paper instructions at their residence, i had to find information out on my own. Carnival Cruise Line (my employer) does a great job at providing us with info.  Provide info about how sea level rise may affect the next storms and flooding Keep the public informed about seasonal water management  Provide info in a Smart Phone app  Provide information explaining how Miami-Dade will respond in case of an emergency of any type.  provide information for people to be ready  PROVIDE INFORMATION OF TELEPHONE # AND PLACES TO CONTACT OR VISIT IN THE AREA  provide materials like, literature or tv information  Provide materials with routes, contact information  Provide me with phone # that I can call  Provide preparedness materials throughout the entire communities  provide public advices/classes to community's leaders to train and prepare the community for these events.  provide reminders to set up disaster supply kit, evacuation and emergency preparedness plan. My family is usually not worried about it because we generally have plenty of time to formulate a plan for hurricanes, but that probably isn't the best way. 636 Page 228 of 265  Provide specific preparation advice for apartment rentals and tenants in medium density housing areas.  Provide specifications for specific locations (neighborhoods) storm surge planning map difficult to interpret (too small)  Provide timely information to local media outlets  provide trainings for emergencies in libraries in .  provide where are shelters by zipcode  Provide with evac plans  Provided information in checklist format  Providing additional detailed information which may be acceessed through the miamidade.gov page. B. Using the major TV stations (i.e., channels 4, 7, 10) to inform the public of the miamidade.gov page as well as of other information.  Providing information as soon as it is available.  Providing road alert sign messages throughout major sections in the community.  Publish all available hurricane shelter periodically, not just when storm is approaching  Reuniones publicas ( en escuelas o Iglesias de la comunidad) distrubuyendo materiales y explicando como prepararse.  Send for mail emergency numbers o places I can go in an emergency case.  Send information by post vve  send information to phone or email  Send letters of evacuation plans to all homes.  Send to every house a list of preparedness materials and emergency numbers to call  Sending evacuation routes, shelters information, family tips  Sending us a brochure by Mail or email with all the info on how to prepare, checklist of what to do an what to take. If we have to evacuate. I think it will be a good idea to provide discounts on hotels.  Simple list of "who to call" after a disaster. Examples - tree removal, fire clean- up, flood clean-up, down lines  Simple map and TV program that shows shelters for humans and shelters for animals, emergency medical locations. Elderly evacuation procedures.  SPREAD THE WORD  Strongly encourage the population to be self -sufficient for one week. Point out that in case of an hurricane cat. 3 or worse, hitting Miami from the East, th ere might be very little help from within and assistance from outside will be late.  Suggest what to do with vehicles when a home garage in not available.  Take in consideration those who maybe small communities, but still would need information in their lenguage.  Taking action before it is late. Because we do not want to commit to a desition and later was not necessary, the goverment wait to last minute. The public does not expect the goverment to be future readers, it is okay to make mistakes in favor of caution.  television 637 Page 229 of 265  The amount of time allowable for residents to prepare their homes prior to an event. Have been caught in previous tropical storms in the car on the way home because the call was made to late. Puts residents in danger.  The Hurricane Guide should be mailed top residents and the hurricane supply tax free holiday should be extended.  The preparation is always a good helpful for hands for many specially those with one to help them.  There is sufficient scientific evidence of the sea level rising being the most inminent danger for all. This is being minimized and dismissed.  There should be immediate open communication with all media outlets to inform of emergency situations such as evacuation notices.  They can assist by providing more info rmation material for emergencies and disaster.  They can distribute hurricane guides at grocery stores since a lot more people frequent the grocery store than anything else.  To have the information in more places for accessibility purposes.  To improve the indications for the shelters and how to get to them, whenever they exist. Improve the emergency information through the radio, and in shopping centers and shops in general.  To provide enough time and warning for staff to go home and prepare. Those that are exempt to get extra time to go to a shelter.  training classes/ office of safety  TV  Use the same kiosk for the transit schedules to also post emergency preparedness info.  Using all forms of media whether its TV, local radio stations, social media platforms, or providing an emergency app to better inform all people exactly what services are being provided and the details (times, locations, transportation) that will allow them to access them.  visiting areas to educate people  Ways to evacuate Miami from different locations.  we could receive booklet in the mail  website, app  When u move into this county a book should acompany ur lease stating rainfall amounts and best estimate of flooding from just exstensive rainfall situations to possible Hurricane flooding. The Keys gate group supplied little to no info except about insurance. And I am from the Midwest I lived at confluence of Mississippi & Missouri River and everyone knew flood plain just by insurance companies to pamphlets from the state and the Core of Engineers. Here u can't drive down a road and tell it floods in Missouri u could see debri in trees water lines on trees and look at info provided and know what to watch for. Not sure what to do here only been here 3 months. Wife's RN with VA so she can't just evacuate she has job liabilities.  Where can I find an emergency preparedness plan? 638 Page 230 of 265  where in my neighborhood can I access needed services in case of an emergency? Insurance/Home Improvement (10)  avaiable/ better/ home insurance-affordable  Cost of permit for hurricane shutters + cost of shutters excludes people like me who are lower income (< $30,000) & cost is not recuperated enough on home insurance discounts  give homeowners tax rebates to update and fix windows and roofs  Help to the community for fair Home Owner insurance policy from Citizens.  I think we should assist the elderly more with their shutters.  Make sure landlords and property management companies are being responsible.  referrals to handyperson to install hurricane shutters as needed  REFRIGERATOR MAGNET WITH REQ SUPPLIES PER HOUSEHOLD MEMBER.  specially have prepared the insurance company to respond and not to make it hard to clients.  windows coverings Language (29)  English  english  espanol  I NEED MY MATERIALS IN ENGLISH  I speak and understand the English language. From my experience with Hurricane Andrew, I think Miami-Dade county did a very good job.  I would like to get information about it in Spanish for my wife  Indicate sign on the street in Spanish  Ingles o Espanol  need to assist with Spanish and English for our community  Ofrecer materiales de information en mi idioma.  ofreciendo material en mi idioma  Preparation messages must be diffused in multiple languages, especially because many members of our community have a strong tradition or radio and television.  prepare/ provide preparedness material in either English or Spanish  Provide good language translation - most Spanish language material is badly translated  Provide materials in Arabic and give out brochures  Provide Materials in Spanish  provide preparedness information in my language  provide preparedness materials at all libraries in my language. 639 Page 231 of 265  Provide preparedness materials in English , Hispanish and Creole for the Community, workshop for preparation in case of emmergency. Provide shellter and services. Local news and Radio Broadcasters and Alerts.  Provide preparedness materials in my family's language.  Provide preparedness materials in my language - Bulgarian, provide disaster supply kit and water.  provide preparedness materials in my language and sending mail to the residence providing important fact and/or information.  Provide preparedness materials in my native language (Turkish)  provide preparedness materials in Spanish  PROVIDE PREPAREDNESS MATERIALS IN SPANISH  provide radio information in English  Providing Spanish materials and news in Miami  Spanish  spanish No Suggestion/Don’t know about services (35)  although we've been through 2 bad storms, it hasn't affected our house. don't know what I would need if we were affected. don't know what MD offers.  County can only do so much to make it easy to obtain emergency info during the emergency. Sometimes phone lines are down, etc.  dk  Dont know  emergency hasn't happened yet  everything ok for now  How do we know where to go to get this info? Can you mail it to us?  I am unaware of any preparation services  I am very unaware of any service available to me or any service Miami Dade provides. It would be nice if they went around high schools, places of employment for parents and students to educate them on this information.  I didn't know about signing up for Miami Dade Alerts? How do I do that ?  I didn't know I can sign up for Miami Dade alerts until just reading it in this survey. It should be made known better.  I do not expect MiamiDade county to provide for my safety nor the safety of my family in case of a natural disaster; it is up to my family and I to be ready and prepare.  I don't know how I will get updates from M-DC or alerts on my phone or social media - even if I don't follow or sign up, there should be a way to reach me  I HAVE HAD NO REASON TO USE IT'S SEVICES IN THIS AREA AS ON YET.  I have no idea  I have not experienced any state of emergency yet during my stay here  I have not seen much in public services announcements for the storm season.  I haven't received any information on preparations in case of an emergency 640 Page 232 of 265  I haven't taken the time to find out about county resources. One way it would help me to do so, as a county employee if you could send us more information thru our county e-mails like it was done to announce this survey.  Just moved into the apartment so I'm not sure as I complete the survey  N/A  n/a  NA  NA  NA  NA.  Never lived through a disaster so don't know how Dade will respond and pre pare  no comment  No idea  no se  no suggestions  No suggestions at this time  none  Not too sure, I'm assuming they would call or txt me  Nothing I can think of right now Pet Concerns (16)  distributing preparedness materials at the library, on buses, schools etc . so people can be more aware and take it seriously especially those w/pets.  I know they have pet information, but I also know that there are not enough shelters that we can bring pets to.  Identify shelters that take cats.  Make the evacuation zones easier to understand; let more people know about the shelters that allow pets  Miami Dade County seems pretty thorough with alerts, routes, shelters, shelters for pets, preparedness kit and supplies list. suggestion: perhaps police or county volunteer teams can offer emergency/disaster training at community centers or libraries to better engage public with this info.  More info re preparedness for pets(dogs) & more shelter facilities for pets  More information should be provided to pet owners in terms of practical options for evacuating WITH pets in an emergency. Too few shelters accept pets and leaving them behind is not an option.  more shelters that are dog friendly  Pet friendly shelters and/or services  pet shelters  pets  Places that accept pets  Provide information and access to shelters and plans that will allow me to ensure the safety of my dog, my sole companion.  Provide more animal-friendly shelters for high-risk evacuation zones, such as storm surge planning zone A. 641 Page 233 of 265  Provide more precise information on flood zon es and have more shelters that allow pets.  Provide more shelters where pets are allowed or can be housed within the shelter. Planning (14)  A map of the shelter's locations  Create a community alert signal or color coded chart that corresponds to or is revelant to natural disasters or emergencies, this can prepare a community or municipality for any said natural disaster and can prepare residents for the right type of emergency.  Ensures that my Emergency Management Plan is reviewed and updated annualy.  evacuate early, by zones, install weather sirens and test weekly  evacuation from miamidade county realistically will NOT be a viable option and EM officials should not pretend that it is or encourage it as this will result in injuries/deaths in vehicles/on roadways (stuck in traffic). Better methods to shelter in place need to be developed and promoted!  Evacuation options-I think those of us that live south of downtown only think of getting on 95 north--so depending on the storm track, it would be helpful to share options as to whether cutting over to go west in Broward and then head north would be helpful..or just taking the Turnpike and wait in traffic. Some of us might want to leave earlier and would need ideas on safe places to head. Thanks!  evacuation plan for South Florida  FOR EVACUATION, I SUGESTED MORE BUSES ONTHE ROAD TO EVACUATE PEOPLE, THAN PEOPLE BEING AVACUATE IN THEIR OWN CARS THAT MAKES THE TRAFIC MORE EASY TO MOVE.  I live on the Beach in a mandatory evacuation zone, but not every storm has surge (e.g., coming from the west), so I'm worried that I would be required to evacuate anyway.  In the event of a natural disaster, I believe that MDC is going to be prepared, in reference to a man-made disaster, I'm do not know if MDC will be providing the best preparedness which is something my collegues and I have been thinking about since the shootings in both Paris and Orlando.  It would be good to conduct emergency drills involving the community.  larger maps  Twice a day (during rush hours) Miami-Dade demonstrates that there are too many cars and not enough roads. One-way streets would expedite the flow of traffic so that an evacuation would be no different than rush hour.  Updated evacuation plan. Current list of emergency shelters. Power (10)  Alternative for energy shortage should be provided.  Assist fpl in restoring power  Bury exposed power lines to minimize power loss (or offer incentives) 642 Page 234 of 265  Force FPL to replace wooden poles on the south side of Kendale Drive that are already leaning over, or split.  If there is no electricity, (no cell phone,no TV) how will I receive information from emergency services?  Provide FPL updates when power is out via radio  Rectify power outages in a more timely manner  The issue is not Miami Dade, but rather the FPL infrastructure. I live in an area that has above ground power lines and until FPL makes the investment to bury them, the likelihood of losing electricity is very high. That is my primary concern.  There are 13 homes that are with FPL in my neighborhood. We are a lways the first to lose electric. Our wires need changing, (underground). Hasn't been done since the homes were built.  Underground electric wiring install hard storm poles like some other counties in FL. Services (20)  After hurricane passes, in disaster areas, establish police presence, get ice & bottled water until power is restored. mobilize clean-up crews  Better response from services  County wide WiFi. Because many times before an emergency you are on the road and you are busy getting supplies and are not near connectivity.  dade county may help by assisting in trimming tree s that are very tall with out expense of the homeowners.  Do a fair where people can buy basic products that they will need in an emergency with good prices. Take the opportunity to explain more about disasters and what you really need in this situation  help out after the evacuation and curve traffic  I think that in times of emergencies and disasters, miami-dade county should try their best to call individual households and ask them if there is any information they need, personally. It would be tedious, but would be quite a gesture.  I would like a program that would help with hurricane shuttles. I also would like to know what type of transportation is offered if my family had to evaluate.  If we have a storm or hurricane hitting the Miami -Dade County. Emergency units should have ready water pumps for flood areas, portable stop signs to be place on busy streets to have a four stop in case street lights are not working. If power is off for several days, a good idea will be to have a place where portable - sharing chargers are available for the community to recharge cells phones or electronics. In addition, use the highway electronic boards to provide information when storm is approaching.  Insure storm drainage, storm drain ponds, residential county tree trimming/pruning, immediate assistance resources after a disaster event  Make sure that the right numbers to call are available, make sure that in the event that phones are not working, people know where to go and what to do  Managing the traffic and response time in a more timely manner. 643 Page 235 of 265  PLEASEPLEASE have adequate shelters for individuals whose homes cannot withstand a hurricane and those who are imfirm or dependent on Oxygen  providing transportation  services slow after depends on how bad the hurricane is - Andrew  Since I live in Homestead. My lights and water are with the City of Homestead. I concerned that the response time will be delayed. Also, if the city of homestead is ready and provided info to their residents  Slow response time for services (electricity and debris removal) when hurricanes, etc. do happen in the area  tree trimmings  We can only prepare so much and if it is anything like Hurricane Andrew, I am sure a lot will be leaving so the roads need to be clear.  When calling 311 or information to speak to a live person takes forever. More staff to answer calls. Supplies (31)  El Condado de Miami Dade es muy eficiente y informative , pero en caso de Desastre que nique Dios lo quiera si nos puede ayudar o materiales nos nos vendria mal y sobre todo para aquellas personas de bajo recursos que nuestro Condado es bien pobre.  Food and water  Frist aid kits. Emergency aid kits. Water, Food, and Shelter. and haveing prepared , trained,and exprienced paramedic's, officers and wise suvillians to know how and when to responed to emergencies. officiers and  Give resident (homeowners) enough sand bags in case of flood emergency. Water, food is emergency kit.  Have adequate water and food within walking distances and enough boats or rafts nearby in case of a major flood. Maybe working in partnership with local grocery chains.  Help access supplies and transportation  I trust that the Doral Emergency Operations Center has more than pickles and cookies to feed the Hurricane workers. What about toilet paper at the Emergency Operations Center? Please do not rely on cellular telephones after hurricane because they will be jammed during the daytime.  ice supply plan by county  Instead of waiting for a disaster to take place then providing assistance, maybe the county could supply low income households certain items ahead of an emergency situation.  make emergency supplies more readily accessible.  materials  materials  Move faster when there is a disaster, give people what they need such as materials  office computers, phone texts, and personal emails. 644 Page 236 of 265  Ofreciendo kits de emergencia a precios accesibles en venta, kit de comida para dos o tres días a un precio razonable  Provide discounts with stores like Home Depot and Walmart to buy emergency supplies, etc.  provide emergency kit, provide evacuation plan and locations  Provide free emergency supplies per household i.e. free weather radio or batteries...something  Provide free weather radios for those under-privilege or low income families. Example: Elderly, Those receiving: Section 8, Public Housing, shelter assistance, those who meet the poverty line mark. They all will benefit from this assistance; free weather radio.  Provide necessities PRIOR to the hurricane  Provide preparedness materials  provide preparedness materials  provide preparedness materials every season  provide radios to keep in contact with staff  provide resources  provide sandbags, lower canal levels prior to storms arrival , p rovide emergency trash and debris pick-up prior to storm  should distribute emergency kits to needy residents  taking ice and water to the households  The County could offer disaster supply kits (Free or for sale)  The County might better serve the community b y have specific points, or stores where emergency equipment can be bought by the residents.  We need a working computer in the home. We need disaster supply kit and we need an evacuation plan. Catch All (12)  Always doing better than the day before.  How can someone truly prepare for a disaster! It's called a disaster.  I need to do my own research in order to find out if the information is already available on the web (as I suspect it should be), before making suggestions.  I rely on family members to keep me informed about these things. I am too old to keep up with this on my own.  I think is a matter of threat that people begin to prep for a storm.  I think the county can assist by providing water, ice, can food ,shelters , media info for the public.  I work at 311 so I have access to many resources for this  In an effort to get more quality help community service hours should be offered/given to all students.  It is not the fault of Dade County that I do not have a plan and or resources yet, it is mine. I know the County does not have the time, money, and resources to inspect and ensure everyone has an emergency kit or plan. If you live here, you should know the possibility of a disaster, and it is up to us to prepare. If you do a quick search on the internet or go to any municipality, they information to help 645 Page 237 of 265 people prepare (checklist) and other useful information. The one thing I would like to see and I have not found, is if am evacuated, where are the emergency shelters?  Lack of money to prepare  Spend tax payer money wisely  yes Question 14a. If you answered “Yes” to any of the hazards (i.e. hurricane, wildfire, etc.), why did you evacuate (only “other” answers are displayed here)? House Concerns (14)  After Wilma without power I had rats in my house  Chemical explosion in my apartment building  DIDN\'T BELIEVE HOME WAS SAFE  evacuated to a stronger building structure  Had to leave home after Hurricane Andrew--deemed uninhabitable  Home damaged  homeless  I am in a high-rise condo and will evacuate if we get a cat 3 or higher hurricane, for a 1 or 2, the building is secure, for 3 or higher, or depending on the size and nature of any storm based on news reports and closely following the storms development, then I decide whether to stay or go. I lived through H urricane Andrew and never want to go through that again.  I evacuate to a shelter because I feel that these homes in Miami Dade County that have been through Hurricane Andrew, Wilma & Katrina can \'t take too much more! Peace of mind.  I lived on a boat at marina  lived in a trailer  My house was flooded  only left while repairs were being made  Place was unsafe Family/Pets (19)  BROTHER WITH BETTER PROPERTY  Elderly living at home  Evacuated to go care for my mother, as her home care aids did not stay during hurricanes  evacuated to protect elderly in household  Evacuated to protect other family members also in hurricane\'s potential path  had a newborn and felt more secure at my parents\' location  I evacuated to be with someone (mother-family)  I had family to stay with in another zone  i was a child & my family did so  Mom decided when child  No electricity with a newborn baby, left the county 646 Page 238 of 265  Protect pets  Sick family member that may have required medical assistance  stayed at hospital - pregnancy  To protect pets as well.  Too young to remember  went in labor  went to adult child\'s home with added safeguards  went to stay with a relative No Utilities (3)  Evacuted after Hurricane Andrew because there was no electricity and no water service.  Had friends and family in the area on vacation and rather than having spend time in hot place without electrical power and no A/C, we took off for Orlando.  No electricity Work (3)  had to be out of town the upcoming week and didnt want to risk being stuck in miami  had to work on 72 hour emergency shift  Worked in hospital had to return Catch All (11)  Huricane Andrew the order to evacuate did not occur early enough.  Hurricane Andrew after the fact  I don\'t remember whether evacuation was ordered or recommended  I was a volunteer, managing a SNEC shelter center at the time a public official ordered a evacuation.  Miami Beach 33141  never experienced a tragic diaster  no need to evacuate  not threatened but mock trial etc - went to a hotel  seeing and feeling the weather  TV-evacuation  was moving that day and had not choice. Question 15. Who is most likely to influence you to comply with an evacuation order (only “other” answers are displayed here)? Combination (7)  all  all  An elected official on the news along with the warning where to go.  Combination of PS official, employer, news, family 647 Page 239 of 265  famiy,and maybe officals  News/TV-non-electal official \"expert in field\"  police Community Group/Home (2)  Senior citizen center  wife\'s nursing home Facts (6)  A balanced approach through reasoning the facts, history and many of those listed above.  A combination of the above as I\'d need to know the facts.  Accurate, unbiased info  credible news and information source as to the risks involved.  depend on situation  reality of threat Job Concerns (2)  Due to my job in health care in Energy Med at a local hospital my personal evacuation would depend on the hospital\'s essential personnel roster at the time.  i work at a hospital so would most likely be there anyways for work. Me (9)  me  me  My better Judgement  my own evaluation  MY SELF  My self  Myself  myself  Self preservation No One (3)  No One  no one  none NOAA/Meterologist (5)  NOAA  NOAA, NWS, local respected meteorologists  Watching weather and forecasts on internet  Weather Bureau 648 Page 240 of 265  WEATHERMAN Not Applicable (3)  Evacuation never ordered  feel safe at home-lived in this house 29 yrs  I have never had to be evaculated from my property there should be a N?A response to #16 Spouse/Significant Other/Family/Pets (7)  Boyfriend  husband  husband  My Husband  My Mom lives with me and she is oxygen machine dependent  pets  The safety of my pets Catch All (2)  GOD  the evacuation order Question 20. If you were to evacuate, where would you most likely go? In what city and state (if applicable) would that be located? Within Miami-Dade County (194)  33015  33143  33166  33186  2217 nw 7 st  33147 Miami, FL  Aventura  Coral Gables (3)  Country Club Miami Lake  country walk  cutler bay  dade county  dade/broward  Doral (6)  FIU is a shelter  Hialeah (16)  Homestead (3)  Kendall (9) 649 Page 241 of 265  Miami (100)  miami beach  Miami-Dade County (20)  Miami Gardens (5)  Miami Lakes  North Miami Beach  North Miami (3)  Palmetto Bay (2)  pinecrest  Redlands  South Miami (3)  Sunny Isles  West Miami (3)  West little rivee  Westchester Outside Miami-Dade County, Within Florida Florida (General) (24)  Central Florida (2)  Central/Northern Florida (2)  Florida (12)  Norte  North Florida (4)  Somewhere North  up north middle of the state  Way North of Miami Alachua County (3)  Gainesville (3) Brevard County (3)  Melbourne (3) Broward County (106)  33023  33025  Broward (5)  Carol spring  Coconut Creek (3)  Coral Springs (3)  Davie (12)  Fort Lauderdale (17)  Hollywood (13)  Lauderhill 650 Page 242 of 265  Miramar (11)  north lauderdale  Oakland Park  Pampano Beach  Pembroke Pines (16)  Plantation (5)  Pompano  Sunrise (4)  Tamarac  Weston (8) Brevard County (4)  Brevard County  Palm Bay (3) Charlotte County (2)  Port Charlotte (2) Collier County (13)  Marco Island  Naples (12) Duval County (14)  Jacksonville (14) Hardee County (1)  Zolfo Springs Hendry County (1)  Clewiston Hernando County (2)  Hernando  Spring Hill or Melbourne Highlands County (4)  33852  Avon Park  Seabring (2) Hillsboro County (32)  Hillsboro County  Tampa (31) 651 Page 243 of 265 Indian River County (2)  Vero Beach (2) Jackson County (1)  Marianna Lake County (1)  Leesburg Lee County (13)  Cape Coral (2)  Fort Meyers (9)  Lee County  Lehigh Acre Leon County (6)  Tallahassee (6) Lowndes County (1)  Valdosta Madison County (1)  Madision Manatee County (2)  Bradenton (2) Marion County (6)  Dunnelin (2)  Ocala (4) Martin County (7)  Jensen Beach (2)  Martin County (2)  Palm City  Stuart (2) Monroe County (2)  Key Largo (2) Okaloosa County (1)  Mary Esther Okeechobee County (1)  Okeechobee 652 Page 244 of 265 Orange County (106)  Orange County  Orlando (105) Osceola County (4)  Kissimmee (2)  St. Cloud  Winter Park Palm Beach County (36)  Belle glade  Boca Raton (8)  Boynton Beach (4)  Delray Beach (2)  Jupiter (3)  Lakeworth  Lanatana  Palm Beach (3)  Palm Beach County  Palm Beach Gardens or Boca Raton  Riviera Beach  Royal palm  Tequesta  West Palm Beach (8) Pasco County (1)  Pasco County Pinellas County (5)  Largo  Safety Harbor  ST Pete  St. Petersburg  Tarpon Springs Polk County (6)  Lake Wales  Lakeland (3)  Winter Haven (2) Putnam County (3)  Bostwick  Interlachen  Palatka Fla 653 Page 245 of 265 Santa Rosa County (1)  Gulf Breeze Sarasota County (4)  englewood  North Port  Sarasota  Venice St. Johns County (1)  Palm Coast/St. Augustine St. Lucie County (9)  Fort Pierce (2)  Port St Lucie (6)  St Lucie County Suwannee County (1)  Live Oak Volusia County (7)  Daytona (4)  DeBary  Ormond Beach  Port Orange Outside Florida (97)  Anywhere north of Georgia  Arizona (2)  Asheville, NC  Athens, GA  Atlanta GA (13)  Baltimore  Blue Ridge Georgia  Boone, North Carolina (2)  Boston, MA  Brevard, NC  Bronx, NY  Brooklyn NY (2)  Brown Summit, North Carolina  Burke, GA  California (3)  Canton, Georgia  Charlotte NC or NYC  Chicago, IL (2) 654 Page 246 of 265  Cleveland, Ohio  Dacula, GA  Denver, CO  Detroit, MI  Elizabeth, New Jersey  GA  Garfield, Georgia  Gatlinburg, Tennessee (3)  Georgia (3)  Glenville, NC  Hendersonville, North Carolina  Houston Texas  Indianapolis  Knoxville, Tennessee  Lanham, Maryland  Lawrence, MA  Loganville, Ga.  Long Beach, CA  Long Island, NY  Los Angeles California  Maryland  Monterey, California  Morehead City NC  NC  New Jersey (2)  New York (2)  North Carolina (2)  Northern Georgia or Carolinas  NYC  Ohio  Philadelphia, PA (2)  Pittsburg, PA, Chester WV  San Diego, California  Savannah, GA (3)  Shaw, Mississippi  Snellville Ga  South Carolina (3)  Springfield, Tennessee  TENNESSEE  Texas (2)  TN  Tulsa, OK  Union Spring AL  Virginia 655 Page 247 of 265  Washington DC  Waynesville, NC  West Central Georgia  WEST VIRGINIA Outside the Country (2)  LIMA, PERU  Puerto Rico Unknown (33)  ? (2)  ?????  dk - either Dade County or Broward or Hardee, depending  Do not know  don't know (5)  DON'T KNOW TRAFFIC MIGHT STEAR ME  English  I don't know (7)  n/a (6)  No se (2)  not sure (2)  Undecided  Unknown (2)  unsure Based on Information (31)  a donde me indiquen las autoridades correspondientes  anywhere available  Away from the danger!!!  Depend on the storm projections  Depending on direction storm is traveling.  Depends  depends on situation how far I need to go to be safe  Depends on storm (2)  Depends on storm track  Depends on the Hurricane's path  Depends on the storms trajectory.  depends on the track of the storm  Depends on tracking  depends on where storm is tracking. One year we drove to orlando and the storm wound up coming through there, so that was pointless  Depends on where the storm is going  depends on which way the hurricane was coming  depends where the storm is heading 656 Page 248 of 265  Have resided in Broward, Palm Beach, and Orlando (so perhaps one of those areas)  Hopefully remian in Miami dade but as far as Broward  I have Several options  It depends how bad the strom is  it depends where the storms is going  Not sure; depends upon warnings  some safe place  Somewhere the storm isn't going. Sometimes they come across from the Atlantic and curve back from the gulf higher up state so it will most likely be determined as information is gathered.  Still in Florida, away from immediate danger  TBD - Outside of "the cone"  whatever area the storm isnt affect  Where is the storm going?  would depend on storm path Catch All (8)  Mondora  Most likely a shelter  My parents house more inland  NEAREST EVACUATION CENTER  Pine Florida  probaby hospital if they would take us  USA, USA  West of Florida Question 21. If you were to evacuate, where would you most likely stay? Please select the best answer. ALF (4)  alf  Another ALF  ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY  The assisted Living facility that signed a mu tual agreement with my facility and is not under an evacuation notice Family/Friends (11)  depends on where storm is going to go...i may go to a hotel, or may go to a family\'s members house outside Miami-Dade County  Family  family  Family or shelter  family with pick-me up  FRIENDS IN ANOTHER STATE 657 Page 249 of 265  in North Carolina at Tere\'s House  Mother\'s house  residing currently with mother in a zone B area-friends in other counties. Extended family in Miami not reliable either.  Sister\'s home  Sons Geographical Location (3)  Boone, NC  Coral Springs  Miami Coral Park Hospital (3)  Hospital  hospital  jackson Hospital Pet Friendly Hotel (4)  hotel with pets  Pet Friendly hotel  pet friendly hotel  Pet Friendly Hotel/Motel Second Home/Boat/RV (17)  2nd Home  2nd home  2nd home in Ga  2nd residence  boat  Have a house in Hendry County  home  home in Georgia  Home outside Florida  Motorhome  my other residence  my vacation home  other home  RV  Vacation 2nd residence  Vacation condo  vacation home Catch All (10)  A Florida building code certified structure  Anywhere, and i mean anywhere where lives are being needed. 658 Page 250 of 265  Apartment  Concrete Warehouse  hunting camp  n/a  Stay home is a safe place  street  we have agreeements  Whereever I had too. All the above if not perhaps in the car or a tent by the car. Question 22. Which of the following methods of transportation would you most likely take during a hurricane evacuation (only “other” answers are displayed here)? Ambulance (2)  Ambulance  ambulance Can’t Drive (2)  Can\'t drive staying put  I don\'t drive anymore. Age is a factor. How-and I truly don\'t know. How I would handle it. Previously left Dade County for more inland Florida-for 3 days. Depends (6)  DEPENDING / FLIGHT  depends the conditions  depends the situation !  either my car or a plane, it depends on where and how big the hurricane is  which ever is safest  would depend Don’t Know (11)  do not know  do not know  don\'t know  I do not know  I do not know  I don\'t know  I don\'t know  need assistance for travel  need ride with others  none  Not sure mode of transportation Family/Friends (4)  Family member will pick me up.  My family will pick me up 659 Page 251 of 265  w/friend don\'t drive  with friend or public bus Personal Vehicle (7)  car  car  I have a Van  Motorhome  My car  my car  RV Public Transportation (7)  Metro Rail or Metro Mover  personal car was stolen-mostly likely bus/evacuation shuttles, if possible.  public transportation  senior citizen bus  shelter van  STS transportation  uber Catch All (3)  police car  red cross vehicle  rocket ship Question 25. What might prevent you from leaving your place of residence if there was an evacuation order? Select ALL that apply. Evacuation Issues (2)  Don\'t know if I would be able to easily access my neighborhood after the emergency.  physical obstacles on roads Comfort/Confidence in Home (4)  comfort of being at home  CONFIDENCE IN SECURITY OF HOME BASED ON PRIOR STORMS  I feel safer at my apt with impact windows  My home is well secured Depends (1)  Depending of circumstances Do Not Know (3) 660 Page 252 of 265  do not know  I don\'t know  unknown Family (7)  81 yr old mother and 16 yr old son  currently residing with elderly mother and a \"know-it-all\" brother who doesn\'t believe in the \"surge zones!\"  depend on family decision  Depends on plans of other family members.  family  Family members won\'t leave  My family will move me Health (3)  Needs electricity for brathing machine  Unless in hospital.  Would need an aide to take me Job (7)  even as esential employee  HOSPITAL DUTY  I\'m a county employee and may need to work  My job let us know recently they expect us to come to work and stay.  spouse is MDPD  spouse\'s job as a first responder  work Nothing (3)  none  none  NONE Pet (1)  pet Weather Conditions (4)  conditons  There is an active storm near my residence.  Uncertainty of landfall location  weather Question 27b. If applicable, please indicate what kind of outside assistance your household may need during an evacuation (i.e. Transportation, Medical, etc.). 661 Page 253 of 265 Ambulance (4)  ambulance to take mother to the hospital for her respiratory problem  Ambulence  Medical transportation Ambulances with oxygen and suction machine , medical equipment  stretcher ambulance Don’t Know/Maybe/None (5)  do not know- I am 87 years old  Don't know at this time-sorry  I don't currently need any, except I am severely hard of hearing.  N/A  Ninguno Electricity (4)  electricity for oxygen communicator (produces oxygen)  oxygen and bed dependent  Parents are elderly with health issues - oxygen, wheelchair, etc.  spouse is sick needs refridge for insulin Medical Assistance (29)  Atencion medica  atencion personal, atencion medica, transporte  Autistic Child (wheelchair bound) in my home that would need medical attention, and to be able to have electricity to hook up g-tube for feeding on machine. Along with numerous medications to be administered.  maybe medical  medical  medical  medical  medical  medical  medical  medical  medical  medical  Medical  Medical  Medical  Medical  Medical  Medical  Medical  Medical 662 Page 254 of 265  medical assistance  medical assistance for daughter  Medical assistance for elderly mother  Medical for my mother of 77 years if she is ill at the time of evacuation.  Medical for my wife who is currently pregnant  Medical. I have a bedridden daughter with lots of special needs.  medicina/doctors  pregnant - depends on how close to birth Medical Condition (3)  Asthma  diabetics, high blood pressure  spouse with chronic renal failure, amputed toe, aggressive high blood pressure, sugar Mobility Assistance (17)  ambulatory (wheelchair)  Assistance walking.  Disable child using a wheel chair.  I am handicapped. I would need wheelchair and assistance from family or friends packing and getting out of my home  Mobility assistance  Mobility assistance  mother is 81 yrs old cannot walk too much (will need wheelchair)  outside agency, wheelchair  Rollator or wheelchair for walking assistance.  Someone to assist old on in walking  wheel chair and medications for an old person  wheel chair bound  wheelchair  wheelchair accessible  wheelchair accessible vehicle if traffic even allowed for evacuation.  wheelchair assistance for parents.  wheelchair transport Transportation (55)  A ride  bus  drive a car  Evacuation transportation  Family and or Special Transportation  I might need help with Transportation  may need a lift van  Medical transport, nursing facility 663 Page 255 of 265  MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION  Medical Transportation  medical transportation  metrobus  Special Transportation for both my parents. They cant walk much  STS  STS to transport elderly family member  Transport  Transport. Medical assistance availability due to existing medical situation.  Transportation  Transportation  Transportation  Transportation  Transportation  Transportation  Transportation  Transportation  Transportation  Transportation  Transportation  transportation  transportation  transportation  transportation  transportation  transportation  transportation  transportation  transportation  transportation  transportation  Transportation  Transportation  Transportation and medical  Transportation and medical  transportation as I no longer have access to a vehicle and have h ad a decrease in salary funds over the years.  transportation medical getting food meds  Transportation of the elderly  Transportation, adequate place to stay where electricity is not threaten for medical breathing machine functions  Transportation, care for 8 months old Baby and 93 years old  transportation, medical  transportation, medical 664 Page 256 of 265  transportation, medical  transportation, medical  transportation, medical for pet  Transportation, our car is broken.  Transporte para disability residentes en el ALF Catch All (11)  assist in packing  assitive devices  elderly person  everything emergency suplies  help with yard and shuttering; help with personal belongings in event of evacuation; transportation  helping with an elderly family member  INFANT CHILD  Mine to leave the house faster  My own feet.  Paseo medical center  shelter/hotel Question 28b. If yes, how many pets do you have?  2 ferrets, 1 gerbil  a bunny  Aquarium fish  Bearded Dragon  Bearded Dragon  Bearded Dragon (reptile)  Bird(s) (53)  bird, turtle  birds, fish  birds, tortoise  canarios  canary, snake  Chickens (3)  doves  Ferrets  Fish (23)  Fish & Parrot  Fish and Bird (2)  fish and turtle (3)  guinea pigs (3) 665 Page 257 of 265  Guinea pigs fish  guinea pigs, hedgehog  guinea pigs/rabbits  Hamster(s) (3)  hamsters, getco fish  hare  horses  Horses, livestock  lizard (small)  Lizards and a hamster  outdoor cats  Parrot (7)  parrot, fish, turtle  Rabbit (6)  Rabbit, Turtles, Ball Python, Bearded Dragon  Rabbit/Turtles  rabbits and fish  rabbits, guinea pig, and a pot belly pig.  Rabbits/ fishes/ hamster  Rats, ferrets, rabbit  REPTILES, FISH  Snake (2)  sugar glider  Tarantulas  Tortoise(s) (3)  tortoises, parrots, birds  tortoises, rabbit, lizard  Turtle (2)  TURTLE, GUINEA PIGS Question 28c. If yes, what would you do with your pet(s) during an evacuation? Please select the best answer. Bring Some, Leave Others (2)  Take the bird, leave the fish tank  Tkae dog, leave birds inside house. Let Go (1)  Let them go Stay Home (1)  If I can\'t take them with me I will stay with them at home. Stay with Family (2) 666 Page 258 of 265  PET STAYS WITH FAMILY  I would either stay behind and ride out the storm, if a cat 1 or 2, but if it \'s a 3, 4, or 5 - my dog would go with me no matter what. I would never leave my dog behind. EVER. Catch All (2)  Only to the most responsive pets  follow my disaster plan i have in place and aproved by FWC Question 29. What type of structure do you live in? ALF (5)  ALF  Assisted Living Facility  Assisted Living Facility  Es un ALF  Single family home licensed as an ALF Apartment (2)  apartment  garage apt Condo (2)  2 stories condo  Condo Dorm Room (1)  dorm room House (7)  a house and mother daughter  Attached Twin Home  house  house  house  Multi family 3 story  sEMI-DETAC HED SINGLE FAMILY HOME. Shelter (2)  Homeless Shelter  Shelter Townhome (22)  attached town home 667 Page 259 of 265  TOWN HOME  Town house  Townhome  townhome  Townhome  townhome  Townhome  Townhome  Townhome  Townhome Community  TOWNHOME/ROW HOUSE  townhouse  Townhouse  townhouse  Townhouse  townhouse  townhouse  townhouse  townhouse  townhouse  Townhouse - attached 1 side Catch All (2)  rental community  shoping center Question 34. Which of the following best describes your race/ethnicity? Select ALL that apply. American (3)  American  AMERICAN  United States Citizen Bi-Racial/Multi-Racial (10)  1 bi-racial  Mix Race  mix race  mixed  mixed  mixed Far East and South Asian, American Indian, Black,White - non hispanic  Mixed race  multiple  multiracial 668 Page 260 of 265  Multi-racial Not Applicable (8)  Does this really matter?  Human  na  None of your business  noneyourdamnbusiness  NOT APPLICABLE  Not saying  People Catch All (27)  American Italian descent  black  brasileira  Brown - Hispanic  Caribbean Asian  Caucasian (2)  cuban  Episcopaleon  European (2)  Filipino  guyanese  Haitian  Hispanic (4)  Iranian American  Italian/Puerto Rican  Jamaican  jewish  Middle East  Middle Easter & Latin  Moroccan  Puerto Rican  Russian  South American/English  West Indian (2)  WHITE CUBAN  WHITE- LATIN BRAZILIAN  White West Indies Question 35. Please indicate the language(s) spoken in your household. Select ALL that apply. 669 Page 261 of 265  Arabic (2)  Brazilian Portuguese (2)  broken English (African)  Bulgarian  Cantonese and Hakga  CAT  Catalan  Chewbacca  Chinese (4)  Creole  dialec paraguay  dialeto india  Dutch (2)  Dutch and Papiamentu  Farsi  German (11)  Greek  hebrew  I speak only English, AirBNB family speaks both English and Spanish  Italian (10)  little Spanish and some French  Mandarin (2)  Native Spanish-speaking mother \"spang-lish\" brother; I am bilingual and fluent in both; and both 20+ age children are only English native speakers.  Pilipino (2)  Polish (2)  Portuguese (23)  Russian (4)  Serbian  Sicilian (2)  some Spanish  Stillnone of your business  swedish  Tagalog (4)  Tagalog, Ilocano, Pangasinan  Turkish  URDU  urdu  what I like to speak 670 Page 262 of 265 APPENDIX B: SURVEY 671 Page 263 of 265 672 Page 264 of 265 673 Page 265 of 265 674 Page 266 of 265 675 Page 267 of 265 676 Page 268 of 265 677 Page 269 of 265 678 Page 270 of 265 679 Page 271 of 265 APPENDIX C: POSTCARD & HANDOUT Postcard 680 Page 272 of 265 Handout 681 Miami-Dade County Office of Emergency Management (OEM) 9300 NW 41st Street Miami, FL 33178-2414 305-468-5400 www.miamidade.gov/oem 682 Local Mitigation Strategy Whole Community Whole Community Hazard Mitigation Part 5: Meeting Minutes December 2017 683 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 5: Meeting Minutes December 2017 P5-i This page left intentionally blank. 684 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 5: Meeting Minutes December 2017 P5-ii PART 5 – MEETING MINUTES ...................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE MINUTES OF THE WORKING GROUP MEETINGS .................................................................. 1 NOTES FROM MARCH 15, 2017 MEETING ..................................................................................................................... 2 NOTES OF THE JUNE 21, 2017 MEETING ...................................................................................................................... 5 SPECIAL NOVEMBER 15, 2017 MEETING ...................................................................................................................... 9 NOTES FROM DECEMBER 13, 2017 MEETING ............................................................................................................ 10 2017 MEETING ATTENDANCE ................................................................................................................... 14 685 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 5: Meeting Minutes December 2017 P5-1 Part 5 – Meeting Minutes Introduction to the Minutes of the Working Group Meetings The initial meeting between Miami-Dade County and the first group of interested municipalities and other parties was held May 5, 1998 at the Miami-Dade Emergency Operations Center (EOC) at 5600 S.W 87th Av- enue, Miami, Florida 33173 (the EOC moved to its present location at 9300 N.W 41st Street, Miami, FL 33178 on June 15, 2000). These representatives formed the nucleus of the Working Group and were established to fulfill the obligations of a grant from the state of Florida. The following minutes of the meetings of the Local Mitigation Strategy Working Group will provide the reader with an overview of the beginning, development and the continuing activities of the group. Originally, it was required by the state that a schedule of meeting was to be maintained; however, as of the eighth year of the Working Group, the schedule was no longer pub- lished. August 12, 1999 was the last meeting under the original state contract. In September 1999 the meeting frequency was changed from monthly to quarterly. Meetings dates have now been stabilized and are generally held on the central Wednesday of March, June, September and December. In recent times members of the Working Group have volunteered to host the LMS Working Group meetings, which seems to enhance interest and attendance. The minutes will be continuously published as they clearly demonstrate the growth and de- velopment of the Local Mitigation Strategy in Miami-Dade County. While a part of the document, the minutes are published separately from the LMS document. As of December 21, 2015 only the most recent year of meeting minutes will be included in Part 5 of the LMS. A complete archive of meeting minutes from 1998 to the most recent calendar year is available upon request from the LMS Chair at mdlms@miamidade.gov. 686 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 5: Meeting Minutes December 2017 P5-2 Notes from March 15, 2017 meeting Thank you to everyone who could attend our webinar. We had 68 people representing 51 different agencies. Here is what we covered: Announcements • There will be an Open House at NWS Miami on Saturday March 18th from 10:00 am – 2:00 pm 11691 SW 17 Street, Miami 33165 • The Statewide Hurricane Exercise will be held on May 3rd. This year the seven Divisional EOCs will activate and host the Satellite EOCs. For the CRS communities that need the credit you should coordinate with your Divisional EOC to ensure you have representation on exercise day. If you have questions you may contact Yahiritza Alvarez - yda@miamidade.gov or 305-468-5424 • The 100 Resilient Cities partnership for Greater Miami and the Beaches has opened a survey to get feedback from the community in relation to what their concerns are now and in the future with cli- mate change and sea level rise. Please post or send out the following Survey Monkey link to help get the community to take the survey. https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/gm-b the survey is availa- ble from that location in English, Spanish and Haitian Creole. • On March 30th from 1:00 – 3:00 pm there will be a Whole Community Engagement Meeting to dis- cuss trending topics such as screwworm and rabies updates, emergency shelters, preliminary damage assessment and Zika. It will be held at the MDFR Training Auditorium (building behind EOC) at 9300 NW 41 Street in Doral. • There will be a Mosquito Abatement Meeting on April 3, 2017 from 9:30 – 11:00 am in the MDFR Training Auditorium at 9300 NW 41 Street in Doral. We will make available the Drain and Cover door hangers, rack cards and posters in English, Spanish and Haitian Creole for you to pick up and disseminate/display in your community. Please contact Cathie Perkins if you are interested in at- tending or picking up materials. perkins@miamidade.gov or 305-468-5429. • There will be a FEMA Coastal Flood Map Technical Update Meeting on March 28th from 10:30 – 12:00 in the MDFR Training Auditorium at 9300 NW 41 Street in Doral. This meeting is a follow up for the new proposed FEMA Coastal Flood Maps that are being updated and ensuring we have incorporated any local knowledge to help information flood risk areas. • On May 12th NOAA will be hosting the National Hurricane Tour at Opa-locka Airport. It will be open to selected public schools in the morning and then to the public from 2:30 – 5:00 pm. There will be two hurricane hunter planes on site with educational presentations, static displays and infor- mational booths. If you are interested in having a table at the event to help promote any hurricane preparedness information. Please contact Cathie Perkins at perkins@miamidade.gov. We will send 687 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 5: Meeting Minutes December 2017 P5-3 out the flyers for the event as the date gets closer. This may be a good opportunity for CRS commu- nities to have someone to speak on flooding issues and have information on hand. Currently we be- lieve there will be about 1000 school kids in the morning and about 1000 people from the public. • There will be a Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) Webinar on March 22nd at 9:00 am to discuss monies from Hurricanes Matthew and Hermine. Though we are not a Tier 1 or Tier 2 com- munity you may be able to get some funding if the declared counties do not utilize all the funds available. The registration link is https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/7890229962568261379 State Hazard Mitigation Plan update The state is working on the update for their plan. They have sent a copy of the risk matrix and the ranking of the hazards for all the Counties. During the meeting, we discussed it and encouraged everyone to review and provide feedback. We received some initial feedback in relation to some of the hazards. Terrorism should be rated higher; we should consider making extreme heat at least low to account for the vulnerable populations that may have limited or no access to air conditioning. Freezes should perhaps be at least low to account for agricultural 688 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 5: Meeting Minutes December 2017 P5-4 interests and Technological Events may need to be at least low or medium due to increases in cyberattacks. If you have any comments, please pass them along to Cathie Perkins and we will compile them and send them to the State. We are also doing a comparison to our Threat Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment. The State will send out a draft of the Hazard Profiles soon and we stressed the importance of getting local reviews and input to ensure that any hazards we face here locally are documented in the State plan to ensure that our unique concerns are included. As soon as that is made available I will provide copies to whomever is interested, for your review and comment. Impacts Catalog Our guest presenter for the meeting was Arlena Moses from National Weather Service Miami to discuss the Impacts Catalog and how you can help. The NWS Miami wants to ensure they best understand your thresh- olds/criteria for different weather hazards and how they impact your decision making. The NWS Miami wants to be able to create better tools to enable them quickly to identify potential weather threats based on your hazard assessment input. Arlena provided a survey that I have attached to this email that if you would be so kind as to fill out and return to her. We would like to get more localized information on flooding. If you have data layers or maps that could assist with providing this information, please let her know. They also want to make sure their commu- nications with you are meeting your needs so how they can best communicate with you and what formats information could best be conveyed in. They would also like to have awareness of any special events you may have coming up or that you host on an annual basis so they can monitor any weather-related concerns and keep you apprised. We opened the meeting up for questions from the group. Everyone was reminded to send a sign in sheet if they had more than one person on the call so we could ensure they go accounted for. Our next meeting will be on June 21, 2017 from 9:30 – 11:30. We are awaiting confirmation if we can have it at the new Aventura Library, so I will keep you posted. Let me know if there are any special topics you would like to have discussed. That concluded the meeting. 689 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 5: Meeting Minutes December 2017 P5-5 Notes of the June 21, 2017 Meeting Thank you to everyone who could attend our meeting at the beautiful Aventura Library. We had 40 people representing 27 different agencies. Here is what we covered: Announcements • The Senate has confirmed the new Director for FEMA. Brock Long who served as a previous Direc- tor of Emergency Management for Alabama and currently works for Hagerty Consulting will be sworn in soon. • The proposed federal budget includes cuts to the National Flood Insurance Program. This includes eliminating the funding to the RiskMAP program. The NFIP program is up for reauthorization the end of September and this may have a big impact on FL. FL has more NFIP policies than any other state and Miami-Dade has most those. Surcharges that may be added onto the program will be passed onto the policy owners. Getting into and maintaining your status in the Community Rating System will be essential to helping your residents save money. • The state recently provided us with the Environmental and Historical Preservation class. Federal dollars that are received may be subject to EHPA considerations. Some of the items you should be taking into consideration can be found in the Florida Greenbook. http://dos.myflorida.com/me- dia/697183/fdem-the-florida-greenbook-of-environmental-and-historic-preservation-compliance.pdf I am also attaching to the email a pdf copy of the slides provided by the instructors for your infor- mation. • Miami-Dade County is updating their Comprehensive Development Master Plan. You can provide input on the plan via this link https://mdc2040.metroquest.com/ • Katie Hageman reported that the County recently wrote a report on which roadways are vulnerable to flooding and sea level rise. The report points to two resources in a recent FHWA administration study that identified major roadways that are currently vulnerable and FDOT/UF’s tool that is an online tool where users can explore in more detail future impacts. http://www.miami- dade.gov/mayor/library/memos-and-reports/2016/11/11.30.16-Final-Report-for-Assessment-of- Available-Tools-to-Create-a-More-Resilient-Transportation-System-Directive-160220.pdf • Miami-Dade ITD and OEM are working with the DSWM and DTPW to create a real-time tracking tool for debris clearance and removal. This will be rolled out to municipal and the State DOT for their usage as well to help us track the status of debris issues real time after an event. 690 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 5: Meeting Minutes December 2017 P5-6 • Miami-Dade OEM continues to work with the ARM360 vendor for the update of the damage assess- ment system that will include the Android and IOS versions. As soon as it is ready we will send out information on training. 2017 Hurricane Season and Products Presentation Rob Molleda of NWS Miami was kind enough to provide us our annual update on the hurricane season and new products that are available to the public this season. Though Rob provided the 2017 Hurricane Season Outlook, he cautioned all of us that this does not by any means tell us what this means for us. This is an overall guestimate and not a local forecast. We are already at our third named storm of the season, which he said is not unusual. The current conditions of warmer waters and less wind shear can increase the formation of storms, so be vigilant. This year you will see some changes in the National Hurricane Center products that will be made available. The overall look of the tropical advisory graphics has been designed to have a “cleaner” look and feel. It will display the initial wind field size of the storm and not just the cone. Remember the cone shows where the center of the storm is 2/3 of the time but does not show the extent of the winds. The new image shows the extent – in this case (to the right) of tropical storm force winds. If there were hurricane force winds they would be indicated in the reddish-brown color in the key at the bottom of the graphic. Storm Surge Watches and Warnings will be issued this year to help notify the public of the greatest threat to life for hurricanes. Storm Surge Watch indicates there is a possibility of life-threatening inundation within 48 hours and the Warning within 36 hours to these areas. Remember except for mobile homes residents and electric dependent folks, this is the reason we issue evacuation or- ders. There will also be a Potential Storm Surge Flooding Map to show how much inundation may be expected. 691 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 5: Meeting Minutes December 2017 P5-7 One of the most important things once you know a hurricane is coming your way, is to start monitoring what the local impacts are going to be. The National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service Miami have a great new Hurricane Threats and Impacts (HTI) page that will give you information on the winds, surge, flooding rain and tornado threats. The tabs in blue (in the graphic to the right) will show the localized threats and impacts that we need to plan for and respond to. Bookmark these links weather.gov/hti or http://www.weather.gov/mfl/ There is also an experimental Time of Arrival Graphic that will show the Earliest Reasonable and the Most Likely arrival times for Tropical Storm Force Winds (TSFW). From an emergency management and preparedness point of view the Earliest Reasonable will be a good guide for when you should plan to have everything battened down and get all of your personnel to safety. The Potential Tropical Cyclone development is the other new product this year. There have been several storms that have developed just off the coast and since they system did not have closed circu- lation there was no product available to issue advisories, watches or warnings. The NHC starting this year will issue Potential Tropical Cyclone products when there is a threat of tropical storm or hurricane conditions to land within 48 hours. If needed, there will also be Extreme Wind Warnings issued for an area when there is a Category 3 or higher storm and there are sustained surface winds of 115 mph or greater expected to occur within one hour. If you hear this warning you should seek shelter within your shelter. Look for those inte- rior rooms/closets without windows. To notify the public of the threats in the area the Wireless Emergency Alert (WEA) system will include the issuance of Hurricane Warnings, Extreme Wind Warnings and Storm Surge Warnings. The experimental NHC products will be utlized this year and are open to comment. You can send feedback to the NHC on the various new products at http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/experimental/?text and scroll down to the product you wish to provide feedback on. Community Rating System Josh Overmyer, CFM, from the State CRS Initiative was kind enough to join us both on the 20th and the 21st to provide us updates to the CRS Manual. As we discussed earlier in the meeting, it is anticipated that NFIP Flood rates will continue to rise for individuals and it will be even more critical for our communities to become CRS members. The 2017 CRS Coordinator’s manual is now available. If you recently had your cycle visit you will continue to use the 2013 CRS manual until you have your next 3/5-year cycle visit. When you have, 692 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 5: Meeting Minutes December 2017 P5-8 your next cycle visit you should use the 2017 manual. (If anyone needs the 2013 manual, I have it as a pdf file and can send it to you.) You can find the updated manual at https://www.fema.gov/media-library- data/1493905477815-d794671adeed5beab6a6304d8ba0b207/633300_2017_CRS_Coordinators_Man- ual_508.pdf In the 2017 manual, you will see vertical bars in the right margin to indicate an area where changes have been made. Appendix D lists the history of changes to the CRS credits. Miami-Dade County residents save approximately $34 Million a year on their flood insurance policies due to the hard work and diligence of their communities. We still have several communities who are not part of the CRS and we encourage you to do so. I am attaching Josh’s presentation to the email as an attachment for those that are interested in reviewing it. We also have a new ISO representative for our area. Craig Carpenter who can be reached at BCarpenter@iso.com or 404-825-3003. State Hazard Mitigation Plan update The state continues to work on their plan update. They are asking for input on their hazard analysis. You can find the documents at this link until June 27th. https://secureftp.floridadisaster.org/?token=74C62BDB-576B- 11e7-80E3-B7B7B45596B1#/ If you have any comments or concerns about their profiles, please let me know so I can compile the comments and send them up to the State. They currently have drafts of the following hazards: Winter Storm and Freeze Wildfire Tsunami Tropical Cyclone Severe Storm Seismic Event Geological Event Flood Extreme Heat Erosion Drought Our next meeting will be on September 20, 2017 from 9:30 – 11:00 as a webinar. You can register at https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/8459665937381955586 Let me know if there are any special topics you would like to have discussed. That concluded the meeting. 693 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 5: Meeting Minutes December 2017 P5-9 Special November 15, 2017 meeting The scheduled September 20, 2017 meeting was cancelled due to Hurricane Irma. In lieu of the quarterly meeting a special meeting was held on November 15, 2017 for a discussion on Mitigation Opportunities under 406 and 404 mitigation, the Environmental and Historic Preservation considerations and how the Local Miti- gation Strategy Working Group will move forward with the pending Hazard Mitigation Grant Program. Presentations were provided by FEMA representatives who also responded to questions from the LMS WG. Meeting notes were not kept for this meeting. The power point presentations that were provided can be made available upon request. 694 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 5: Meeting Minutes December 2017 P5-10 Notes from December 13, 2017 Meeting Thank you to everyone who could attend our meeting at the MDFR Training Center on December 13th. We had 62 people representing 48 different agencies. Here is what we covered: Announcements • We will be offering a Tornado Awareness training on January 17th from 8:30 – 4:30 at the MDFR training Center to register go to https://ndptc.hawaii.edu/training/delivery/2002/ • Per the State, they believe the HMGP announcement will come out in early January 2018. We will keep you apprised. • Tetra-Tech is doing an After Action on Hurricane Irma and our response. We welcome input from our partner agencies so we can best understand what you feel went well and areas that may need im- provement. • When an LMS project is completed please mark it as “Project Complete”, update the timeframe to include the year or month and year, update the total cost and how you paid for it under the funding source and if possible add pictures of your finished project. I will archive it for you. • The Intent to Apply form for HMGP Hurricane Irma monies is due to the LMS Chair by 5:00 pm on January 12th. The excel form is included in the email with this bulletin. perkins@miamidade.gov • The annual update of the LMS is underway and we will be including the updated list of projects to the State, updates to any legislative or policy measures that you have that incorporate mitigation into your agency/municipality, updates to our hazards and recent impacts. If you have any updates to provide, please send them asap as the report is due to the State by January 31, 2018. • We had presentation from three guest speakers as summarized below. The presentations from the LMS Meeting, with the exception of the US Army Corps of Engineers was sent out on December 14th. If you need a copy, please let me know. Guest Speakers Kim Brown, Supervisor of Long-Range Planning, from RER presented on the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) for the Miami-Dade County Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP). The CDMP sets a broad vision for how our county is going to grow and develop over time, this is required by State law. This helps guide Capital Improvement Programs, and ensure that Regulations and Development Approvals are con- sistent. The CDMP must be evaluated every 7 years and reflect changes in state law. The County conducts a comprehensive review and assessment of major issues and reviews the progress towards meeting goals, objec- tives and policies and identifies needed changes. There are 12 different elements included in the CDMP: Land Use, Transportation, Water, Sewer and Solid Waste, Coastal Management, Conservative, Aquifer Re- charge and Drainage, Intergovernmental Coordination, Housing, Capital Improvements, Recreation and Open 695 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 5: Meeting Minutes December 2017 P5-11 Space, Public School Facilities, Economic, and Community Health and Design. You can find out more information about the CDMP at http://www.miamidade.gov/planning/cdmp.asp Kim provided an overview of each element to show the importance of the work being done through this plan- ning process. Of key importance to all of our communities are the Coastal High Hazard Areas (CHHA), those that are below the elevation of the Category 1 Storm surge line, and limiting public expenditures and develop- ment in those areas. Kim provided an interesting projection that our county will grow from the current population of 2.7 million to 3.4 million by 2040. By 2030 the housing supply within the current Urban Devel- opment Boundary (UDB) is projected to be depleted. Agricultural lands which support our economy as the second largest sector are critical. 52,000 acres of agricultural land are needed to maintain a viable agricultural industry and 57,000 acres fall outside of the UDB. As developers look for more places to build and locate people where are they going to go? For Hurricane Irma we evacuated about 650,000 people and as we con- tinue to grow we may be putting more people in harm’s way, increasing our shelter demand and our evacuation clearance times. Emergency Management asked all our stakeholders to help us by letting us be a part of project reviews where there are changes in density and development. Emergency Management needs to be a consideration up front and not when an event occurs. Our second speaker, Robert Molleda from the National Weather Service Miami provided a recap of Hurricane Irma. As we all know we really dodged a bullet with this storm. One, that it was not a direct impact on Miami- Dade and two that the back side of the storm was much weaker and did not produce as much rain as is typical. We could have had twice the amount of rain if the storm had been stronger on the backside. Locally South Florida had hurricane force gusts and additional work is being done to determine if sustained one minute hurricane force winds were a factor. The images of the trajectory of cone from 3 days before to 2 days before illustrates how critical monitoring and planning is. If this had been the other way around and projected to come into the Keys and then veered more to the north then the center could have been us. The big picture that goes beyond the trajectory of the cone is the overall size of the storm and the windfields. This next graphic illustrates how the entire state was experiencing the winds. Even though the eye of the storm was 90 miles away we had frequent gusts of hurricane force winds (as high as 100 mph) in SE Florida. 696 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 5: Meeting Minutes December 2017 P5-12 This next picture shows some of the high water marks and storm surge impacts that were recorded after the storm. There was a 4-6 foot storm surge locally even with the eye of the storm 90 miles away. Rob also has pictures of storm surge at Matheson Hammock park about 5 feet above ground and Brickell with about 2-3 feet of inundation. The NWS Miami was an amazing partner to MD OEM, between on-call and in-person presence. For the first time ever we had a NWS Miami forecaster here in our EOC during the lockdown. Their guidance and input on the threats and hazards helped us make decisions about where to evacuate. NWS Miami provided more than 200 media interviews and gained over 30,000 Twitter followers in less than one week. Our thanks goes out to all of NWS Miami and the National Hurricane Center and to Rob Molleda and Arlena Moses for being in our EOC and providing tremendous guidance. Our last speaker was Colton Bowles from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers who spoke about assistance programs they have available through their General Investigation and Continuing Authorities Program (CAP). Colton provided and overview and handouts on each program that were sent out on December 13th. Below is a list of the programs that Colton spoke about. I am also attaching a copy of his power point presentation to the email sent with this bulletin. 697 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 5: Meeting Minutes December 2017 P5-13 The USACE has over 36,000 engineers with expertise in a tremendous amount of areas so they are a great contact to see if they can help with a study or a project. The Corps can pay up to $100K for a feasibility study and then beyond that it is a 50-50 split. To initiate projects a letter is sent to the District Engineer to request assistance. A template was made available as well. The contact here in Florida if you have questions is Dave Apple at 904.232.1757 or david.p.ap- ple@usace.army.mil. Our meeting was concluded and our next meeting will be on March 21st as a webinar at 9:30 am. https://register.gotowebinar.com/register/4786897981911801603 698 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 5: Meeting Minutes December 2017 P5-14 2017 Meeting Attendance Organization Jurisdic- tion 2017 12/13/2017 11/15/2017 6/21/2017 6/20/2017 3/15/2017 Florida Interna- tional University Colleges and Uni- versities 3 X X X St. Thomas Uni- versity Colleges and Uni- versities 1 X Talmudic Univer- sity Colleges and Uni- versities University of Mi- ami Colleges and Uni- versities 3 X X X Miami Dade Col- lege Colleges and Uni- versities 4 X X X X International Hurricane Re- search Center Colleges and Uni- versities 2 X X University of Florida IFAS Ex- tension Colleges and Uni- versities MD-County Un- incorporated MD County MD-Animal Ser- vices County 2 X X MD-Aviation County MD - Communi- cations County 1 X MD-Corrections and Rehabilita- tion County MD-Courts County Community Ac- tion and Human Services County 1 X MD Cultural Af- fairs MD-Finance County 2 X X MD - Fire Rescue County 3 X X X Office of Emer- gency Manage- ment County 5 QTRLY QRTLY QTRLY CRS Subcommittee QTRLY MD-Internal Ser- vices (GSA, HR, Procurement, A&E of CIP) County 699 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 5: Meeting Minutes December 2017 P5-15 Organization Jurisdic- tion 2017 12/13/2017 11/15/2017 6/21/2017 6/20/2017 3/15/2017 General Ser- vices Admin- istration County 1 X MD - Infor- mation Technol- ogy Dept. County 1 X MD-Library County 3 X X X MD - Manage- ment and Budget Office of Grants Coordina- tion County 4 X X X X Office of Capi- tal Improve- ments MD-Parks, Rec- reation and Open Spaces County 2 X X Agriculture Ex- tension County MD-Police De- partment County 1 X MD-Public Hous- ing and Commu- nity Develop- ment County Public Hous- ing Department County 4 X X X X Public Works Department County MD-Port of Mi- ami County 2 X X MD-Regulatory and Economic Resources County 4 X X X X Environmental Resources Mgmt. 2 X X Permitting (P&Z) County 1 X Planning (P&Z) County 1 X Environmental Resources Man- agement County Solid Waste Management County 2 X X MD-Transit County 3 X X X 700 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 5: Meeting Minutes December 2017 P5-16 Organization Jurisdic- tion 2017 12/13/2017 11/15/2017 6/21/2017 6/20/2017 3/15/2017 MD-Public Works County 1 X Vizcaya Museum and Garden County 2 X X WASD 3 X X X Miami Dade County Public Schools County 2 X X FDEM State 3 X X X FEMA Federal 1 X Miami VA Federal NOAA Federal 3 X X X SBA Federal USDA Federal US ARMY Federal 1 X Baptist Health Hospi- tal/Health Care 2 X X Citrus Health Hospi- tal/Health Care 2 X X Health Choice Network Hospi- tal/Health Care Jackson Health Systems Hospi- tal/Health Care 3 X X X Mercy Hospi- tal/Health Care Miami Beach Community Health Center Hospi- tal/Health Care 1 X Niklaus Chil- drens Hospital Hospi- tal/Health Care 1 X Mount Sinai Medical Center Hospi- tal/Health Care Aventura Municipal- ities 1 X Bal Harbour Municipal- ities 2 X X Bay Harbor Municipal- ities 2 X X Biscayne Park Municipal- ities 701 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 5: Meeting Minutes December 2017 P5-17 Organization Jurisdic- tion 2017 12/13/2017 11/15/2017 6/21/2017 6/20/2017 3/15/2017 Coral Gables Municipal- ities 2 X X Cutler Bay Municipal- ities 5 X X X X X Doral Municipal- ities 5 X X X X X El Portal Municipal- ities 1 X Florida City Municipal- ities 3 X X X Golden Beach Municipal- ities Hialeah Municipal- ities 3 X X X Hialeah Gardens Municipal- ities 1 X Homestead Municipal- ities 3 X X X Key Biscayne Municipal- ities 5 X X X X X Medley Municipal- ities 2 X X Miami Municipal- ities 4 X X X X Miami Beach Municipal- ities 5 X X X X X Miami Gardens Municipal- ities 4 X X X X Miami Lakes Municipal- ities 4 X X X X Miami Shores Municipal- ities 5 X X X X X Miami Springs Municipal- ities North Bay Vil- lage Municipal- ities 2 X X North Miami Municipal- ities 5 X X X X X North Miami Beach Municipal- ities 3 X X X Opa-locka Municipal- ities 1 X Palmetto Bay Municipal- ities 4 X X X X Pinecrest Municipal- ities 3 X X X South Miami Municipal- ities Sunny Isles Municipal- ities 2 X X Surfside Municipal- ities 2 X X 702 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 5: Meeting Minutes December 2017 P5-18 Organization Jurisdic- tion 2017 12/13/2017 11/15/2017 6/21/2017 6/20/2017 3/15/2017 Sweetwater Municipal- ities 2 X X Virginia Gardens Municipal- ities 4 X X X X West Miami Municipal- ities 1 X Broward Region 1 X Chapman Part- nership (Home- less) PNP 1 X dsi PNP 1 X Mactown PNP 2 X X FPL Utility 3 X X X Total Attendance 12/13/2017 11/15/2017 6/21/2017 6/20/2017 3/15/2017 Total Municipalities 28 35 18 22 27 Total County 18 30 15 4 19 Total State 1 0 1 1 2 Total Federal 2 9 2 1 Total Other 6 3 2 10 Total Colleges and Universities 6 4 2 7 Total Guest 1 1 Other County 0 1 Number of Agencies Represented 48 38 27 20 51 Total Individuals in Attendance 62 81 40 27 68 703 Local Mitigation Strategy Whole Community Hazard Mitigation Part 6: Completed Projects January 2018 704 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-1 This page left intentionally blank 705 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-2 What is Hazard Mitigation? ............................................................................................. 6 Why Mitigation? ........................................................................................................... 6 Mitigation in Miami-Dade ............................................................................................. 7 406 Mitigation .................................................................................................................. 8 Windstorm Mitigation ....................................................................................................... 9 Academic Institutions ................................................................................................. 10 Miami Christian School .......................................................................................... 10 American High School ............................................................................................ 11 Florida International University ............................................................................... 12 Johnson & Wales University .................................................................................. 13 University of Miami ................................................................................................. 13 University of Miami ................................................................................................. 15 Florida International University ............................................................................... 16 St. Thomas University ............................................................................................ 17 St. Thomas University ............................................................................................ 18 University of Miami ................................................................................................. 19 University of Miami ................................................................................................. 20 Homeless Shelters .................................................................................................... 21 Community Partnership for the Homeless, Inc ....................................................... 21 Miami Rescue Mission ........................................................................................... 22 Unincorporated Miami-Dade County ......................................................................... 23 Miami-Dade Police Department ............................................................................. 23 Miami-Dade Police Department ............................................................................. 23 Miami-Dade Police Department ............................................................................. 25 A Protected AC System ......................................................................................... 26 Port of Miami .......................................................................................................... 27 Municipalities ............................................................................................................. 28 City of Sweetwater ................................................................................................. 28 City of North Miami Beach ..................................................................................... 28 City of Miami Springs ............................................................................................. 30 City of Miami .......................................................................................................... 31 City of Miami .......................................................................................................... 32 706 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-3 Village of Pinecrest ................................................................................................ 33 Hospitals .................................................................................................................... 34 Miami Children’s Hospital ....................................................................................... 34 Baptist Health South Florida .................................................................................. 34 Jackson Health System .......................................................................................... 36 Jackson Memorial Hospital .................................................................................... 37 The Public Health Trust .......................................................................................... 38 Citrus Health Network ............................................................................................ 39 Low Income Housing ................................................................................................. 40 Hialeah Housing Authority ...................................................................................... 40 The Residential Shuttering Program ...................................................................... 41 Other Projects: The CHARLEE Project...................................................................... 42 Flood Mitigation ............................................................................................................. 43 The C-4 Basin Initiative.............................................................................................. 44 The Tamiami Canal (C-4) Forward Pump .................................................................. 45 The Miami River Forward Pump ................................................................................ 46 The Emergency Detention Basin ............................................................................... 47 The EDB Supply Canal .............................................................................................. 48 The Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida ............................................................... 49 The Sweetwater Berm ............................................................................................... 50 Storm Water Control .................................................................................................. 51 Other Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................ 52 Proper Tree Trimming................................................................................................ 53 Miami River ................................................................................................................... 54 Hurricane Manual for Boaters ....................................................................................... 54 Terrorism Mitigation....................................................................................................... 56 Partnerships .................................................................................................................. 57 Disaster Resistant Universities .................................................................................. 58 Alternate Spring Break............................................................................................... 59 Miami-Dade Citizen Corps ......................................................................................... 60 Miami-Dade CERT Teams ......................................................................................... 61 Hurricane Expo .......................................................................................................... 62 StormReady County .................................................................................................. 63 National Flood Insurance Program ............................................................................ 64 The Florida Building code .......................................................................................... 65 International Hurricane Research Center .................................................................. 66 Save a Life! ................................................................................................................ 67 707 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-4 The Ring Shank Nail .................................................................................................. 68 2013 Projects Reported as Completed ...................................................................... 69 2014 Projects Reported as Completed ...................................................................... 73 2015 Projects Reported as Completed ...................................................................... 78 2016 Projects Reported as Completed ...................................................................... 84 2017 Projects Reported as Completed .................................................................... 100 708 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-5 This page left intentionally blank 709 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-6 What is Hazard Mitigation? “Hazard Mitigation means any action taken to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk to human life and property from natural or manmade hazards.” Why Mitigation? Miami-Dade County, in fact, all of South Florida, is vulnerable to disasters of all types affecting every part of our community; no one is immune. We’ve suffered hurricanes, tornadoes, severe flooding, lightening, wildfires, plane crashes, hard freezes, droughts, citrus canker, mass migration and more. Interested? Want some details? How about this: • Hurricane Andrew in 1992 – DR 955 – $30,000,000,000 • Storm-of-the-Century in 1993 – DR 982 – $50,000,000 • Tropical Storm Gordon in 1994 – USDA-FSA – $90,000,000 • The Ground Hog Day storms in 1998 – DR 1204 – $50,000,000 • Hurricane Georges in 1998 – ER 3131 – $12,500,000 • Hurricane Irene in 1999 – DR 1306 – $800,000,000 • The No-Name Storm in 2000 – DR 1345 – $500,000,000 • Tornadoes in 2003 – DR 1460 – $15,000,000 • Hurricanes Frances in 2004 – DR 1545 – $33,000,000 • Hurricane Jeanne in 2004 – DR 1561 – $10,400,000 • Hurricane Katrina in 2005 – DR 1602 – $500,000,000 • Hurricane Wilma in 2005 – DR 1609 – $4,000,000,000 That is just a portion of projects that have been embarked upon to make our community more resilient. In 1998 a decision was made to do something about it and the Local Mitigation Strategy was born. Now, it’s time to show you what your Local Mitigation Strategy Working Group has been up to. 710 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-7 Mitigation in Miami-Dade Mitigation is not new to Miami-Dade County or to its municipalities and other organizations. Mitigation, as we know it now, began for us during the recovery period following Hurricane Andrew. FEMA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, introduced Public Assistance Enhancements, what we call 406 mitigation (from Section 406 of the Stafford Act), which is mitigation that is performed during the repair or rehabilitation of a facility damaged by the disaster event, in this case, Hurricane Andrew. 406 mitigation continued during the recovery effort following each of the disaster declarations issued since Hurricane Andrew. To protect those facilities that were not impacted by the event, the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, or 404 Mitigation, is available as a major source of funding. Of course, there are many other sources of mitigation funding that are discussed in the Local Mitigation Strategy document itself. In 1998, the state of Florida sponsored the program called the Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) and provided funding to each county in the state to develop, as the name implies, a strategy to mitigate damages from a local perspective. The concept is to bring together all the parties within a county to work together to make their communities safe from disasters. In Miami-Dade County, we have truly made this work. Our municipalities, our county departments, our colleges and universities, our schools, our outreach organizations, our faith based community and our private sector companies have all joined together in the Miami-Dade LMS Working Group and made the Local Mitigation Strategy a reality. The purpose of this supplement to the Local Mitigation Strategy is to document all the fine work that has been accomplished in Miami-Dade County through the efforts of the LMS Working Group.1 1 EMAP 4.4.4 711 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-8 406 Mitigation Floating Docks Protected Electric Stronger Towers Stabilized Banks Canal Cleaning & Shaping Or, PA Enhancements in Miami-Dade 712 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-9 Windstorm Mitigation One of the major causes of damage in South Florida is windstorm: hurricanes, tornadoes and severe thunderstorms. We have been impacted by Hurricane Andrew in 1992, Storm-of-the-Century in 1993, Tropical Storm Gordon in 1994, The Ground Hog Day tornadoes in 1998, Hurricane Georges in 1998, Hurricane Irene in 1999, the “No- Name” storm of 2000 and more tornadoes in 2003, Hurricanes Frances and Jeanne in 2004 and most recently, Hurricanes Katrina and Wilma in 2005. It has been a primary goal of the Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Working Group to mitigate against windstorm whenever and wherever possible. The principle cause of damage in a windstorm is from flying debris that shatters the windows and allows high winds to breech the building envelope, which, in turn, can cause the roof to fail. The most effective, cost beneficial measure to accomplish this is the installation of window protection. Window protection carries one of the highest benefit-to-cost ratios of any mitigation measure. Window protection includes storm panels, accordion shutters, roll- down shutters, passive perforated metal plates, laminated glass, Lexan and other heavy glass. Although very popular, the use of plywood is not recommended because of the difficulty putting it up in a hurry and storing it. This windstorm mitigation has many faces within the LMS program. We have developed the residential shuttering program that installs free hurricane panels on the homes of low-income elderly citizens in our community. We have provided window protection to several organizations that shelter the homeless thereby no longer requiring them to go to a general population shelter during a storm. We have protected county buildings, municipal buildings, university buildings, public school buildings and so on and so forth with the ultimate goal of having every building in Miami-Dade County protected. The following are examples of wind storm protection completed since the Local Mitigation Strategy Working Group was formed in 1998. 713 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-10 Academic Institutions Miami Christian School One of five buildings protected by perforated steel window coverings through Hazard Mitigation Grant Program for total of $230,000. These grants were awarded under FEMA DR-1545, DR-1561 and DR 1609 714 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-11 American High School Schools Retrofit as Hurricane Evacuation Centers American Senior High School, a part of Miami-Dade County Public Schools American High School, above, was retrofit to serve as a hurricane evacuation center serving the public during a hurricane evacuation. Other schools also retrofitted were Barbara Goleman Senior High, Citrus Grove Elementary, Miami Springs Senior High, Southridge Senior High, Sunset Senior High, North Miami Middle School, South Miami Senior High and Southwood Middle School. The combined total cost of the retrofit was $3,612,000 and was funded by the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program through FEMA- 1306-DR-FL, Hurricane Irene. Miami Springs H.S. Miami Southridge H.S. North Miami Middle 715 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-12 Florida International University The third floor of the FIU Biscayne Campus library in North Miami has been hardened for use as a hurricane shelter at a cost of $366,000 and funded by the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program through FEMA-1204-DR-FL, the February 1998 Ground Hog Day tornadoes. Note: This was the first project completed following the formation of the Local Mitigation Strategy. 716 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-13 Johnson & Wales University Located in North Miami, Florida, this university has an on-campus hurricane shelter created to house the university’s residential students during a storm. The shelter, centered on the university library and containing a gourmet kitchen, cost $33,000 and was funded by the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program through FEMA-1204-DR-FL. 717 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-14 University of Miami The University’s Richter Library, above, is one of twelve campus buildings protected by perforated metal panels at a combined total cost of $1,040,000 and funded by the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program through FEMA-1300-DR-FL. 718 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-15 University of Miami Alumni House Cuban American Studies Educational Research Behavioral Medicine 719 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-16 Nursing Dining Hall Perforated Steel @ $1,040,000 Florida International University The student dormitories at the University Park campus have steel wire mesh window protection installed that is hinged and opens out at the center. The total cost is $1,900,000 funded by the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program through FEMA-1300-DR- FL. 720 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-17 St. Thomas University Kennedy Hall, the university’s main administration building, is protected by roll-down shutters throughout. This building houses all the university’s important records and the cost of $300,000 was funded by the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program through FEMA- 1345-DR-FL, the No-Name storm of the year 2000. 721 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-18 St. Thomas University Cassia Dormitory, above, along with Donnellen Hall and the cafeteria have window protection at a cost of $313,000 through FEMA-1602-DR-FL The Cafeteria Donnellen Hall 722 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-19 University of Miami The University’s Performing Arts Center, above, is one of three medical campus buildings protected by perforated metal panels at a combined total cost of $3,618,000 and funded by the FEMA Pre-Disaster Mitigation Grant Program of 2003. Mailman Center for Child Development Rosenstiel Medical Sciences 723 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-20 University of Miami The University’s Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science including the Aplysia Rearing Facility, CIMAS Building, Doherty Marine Science Center, Grosvenor – East, Grosvenor – South, RSMA Science & Administration Building is protected by heavy duty accordion shutters at a total cost of $466,900 and funded by the FEMA Pre-Disaster Mitigation Grant Program of 2004-2005. 724 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-21 Homeless Shelters Community Partnership for the Homeless, Inc This downtown Miami homeless shelter houses over 500 individuals plus staff and is protected by heavy-duty hurricane glass installed throughout at a cost $99,000 and funded by the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program through FEMA-1204-DR-FL. 725 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-22 Miami Rescue Mission This homeless shelter is located in downtown Miami. The men’s dormitory (above) and women’s dormitory (below) are protected by at a cost of $158,000 and funded by the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program through FEMA-1300-DR-FL. 726 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-23 Unincorporated Miami-Dade County Miami-Dade Police Department The Miami-Dade Police Northwest District Station has a reinforced roof at a cost of $103,000 and funded by the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program through FEMA-1539-DR- FL 727 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-24 Miami-Dade Police Department The Miami-Dade Police Training Bureau building was hardened at a cost of $102,000 funded by the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program through FEMA-1545-DR-FL 728 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-25 Miami-Dade Police Department The Hammocks District Station and Northside District Station have hardened roofs at a cost of $318,000 and funded through the FEMA Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program 0f 2004-5. This station also received $90,000 for window protection through the state’s Residential Construction Mitigation Program. 729 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-26 Northside District Station A Protected AC System Accordion Shutters Ground Water Intake Ground Water Return This air handler at the Miami-Dade Information Technologies Building has accordion shutters installed to protect it from flying debris during a storm. The shutters are closed just before the arrival of tropical storm force winds and reopened as soon as the winds subside. The system is also protected from possible loss of the county water supply by allowing the system to draw directly from ground water for cooling then immediately returning the water back to ground. Total cost: $220,000 730 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-27 Port of Miami Terminal H at the Port of Miami has windstorm protection provided by passive, perforated metal panels costing $395,000 and funded by the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program through FEMA-1609-DR-FL, Hurricane Wilma. 731 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-28 Municipalities City of Sweetwater The city hall, which also houses the city’s Police Department, has windstorm protection provided by passive, perforated metal panels costing $130,000 and funded by the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program through FEMA-1300-DR-FL, Hurricane Floyd. 732 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-29 City of North Miami Beach The North Miami Beach City Hall is one of seven municipal buildings in the city of North Miami Beach with window protection installed at a cost of $70,000 and funded by the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program through FEMA-1345-DR-FL. Solid Waste Facility Washington Park Allen Park Center 733 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-30 City of Miami Springs The Senior Citizen’s Activity Center in the city of Miami Springs was outfitted with accordion shutters at a cost of $17,000 and funded by the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program through FEMA-1345-FL-DR. 734 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-31 City of Miami Install Shutters on the city’s GSA Property Maintenance Building for $22,000 through the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program through FEMA-1345-DR-FL. 735 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-32 City of Miami Retrofit the city’s GSA Fleet Maintenance Garage for $565,000 through the Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program of 2003. 736 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-33 Village of Pinecrest The municipal building in the village of Pinecrest was hardened to withstand the strongest of hurricanes at a cost of $342,000 and funded by the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program through FEMA-1345-FL-DR. 737 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-34 Hospitals Miami Children’s Hospital Miami Children’s Hospital is the only licensed specialty hospital exclusively for children in South Florida. The entire main building was encapsulated to provide protection against the most severe windstorm. $5,000,000 of the encapsulation cost was funded by the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program through FEMA-1345-DR-FL. 738 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-35 Baptist Health South Florida Doctor’s Hospital in Coral Gables has a wind retrofit at a cost of $2,027,000 and funded by the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program through FEMA-1545-DR-FL 739 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-36 Jackson Health System The Highlands Professional Building with steel screen through the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program for $487,000 by FEMA 1602-DR-FL. 740 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-37 Jackson Memorial Hospital The Ambulatory Care Center at Jackson Memorial Hospital is protected by perforated steel window coverings for a total of $716,000 through the Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program of 2004/5. 741 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-38 The Public Health Trust Central Building Rehabilitation Annex $222,000 $395,000 South Wing West Wing $414,000 $526,000 Institute Building Rehabilitation Building $394,000 $551,000 Window protection through the Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program 742 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-39 Citrus Health Network This medium sized mental health hospital is located just off the Palmetto Expressway in Hialeah, Florida. Accordion shutters have been installed throughout at a cost of $127,000 and funded by the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program through FEMA-1204-DR- FL. Additionally, the hospital telephone system has had a ground fault system installed to protect against lightning strikes. 743 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-40 Low Income Housing Hialeah Housing Authority Ashley Plaza public housing has steel screen window protection at a cost of $314,400 and funded by the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program through FEMA-1609-DR-FL. 744 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-41 The Residential Shuttering Program House #1 House #1000 The Residential Shuttering Program installs aluminum storm panels on the homes of low-income elderly residents of Miami-Dade County and its municipalities. Pictured above left is house number 1 completed in January 2002. On August 27, 2004, panels were installed on house number 1,000. Also, in this program exterior doors that open in are reinforced as added protection to the building envelope. This project is funded in excess of $2,000,000 through the Residential Construction Mitigation Program, the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program and appropriations by the Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners. The Miami-Dade County Community Action Agency is the lead agency for this program. The Shuttering Committee 745 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-42 Other Projects: The CHARLEE Project This program provides group homes for troubled youth. This is the Kendallwood House, one of four such homes with accordion shutters installed for $75,000 provided by the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program through FEMA-1345-DR-FL. Shenandoah House Bayshore House Pine Acres House 746 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-43 Flood Mitigation The hydrological characteristics of South Florida are unique. Because it is so flat, we will never have huge volumes of water racing down the hillside destroying everything in its path. Flood damage here is much more subtle. We have just the opposite problem; the lack of slope means rainwater does not rapidly run off but must be absorbed into the ground. So, when the ground is saturated and the lakes and canals are full, there is nowhere for the rainfall to go hence, we flood. The main substrate in South Florida is oolitic limestone that is extremely porous; in layman’s terms, like a giant sponge and, like a sponge, works best when it’s damp. Neither a totally dry sponge nor a sopping wet sponge works; the damp sponge is what absorbs water. This is why one of the major stormwater management methods in South Florida is the use of ground recharge systems more commonly referred to as French drains. In 1998, the Quality Neighborhoods Improvement Program (QNIP) bond issue was passed by the voters of Miami-Dade that includes, among other things, approximately $50 million for stormwater drainage projects throughout the county. The county funded mitigation measure was used as the main local cost match for the ensuing C-4 Basin Initiative. Additionally, appropriations by the state legislature for stormwater drainage projects within Miami-Dade County municipal boundaries has averaged $10 million to $15 million annually for fiscal years 2001 thru 2004. These are primarily ground recharge systems with outfalls to various primary and secondary conveyance canals or to nearby lakes. At the same time as the above noted projects are going on, major cleaning and shaping of the secondary canal system is underway under the supervision of the county’s Department of Environmental Resources Management and is funded by “406 Mitigation” tied to Hurricane Irene and the No-Name Storm of the year 2000. 747 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-44 The C-4 Basin Initiative In October of 1999, Hurricane Irene passed over Miami-Dade County causing severe flooding. Then, in October of 2000, one year later, the No-Name storm hit once more causing severe flooding. The governor of Florida tasked the Local Mitigation Strategy Working Group, acting as the Governor’s South Florida Flood Task Force, to find a solution to the flooding problems. A committee was formed and the South Florida Water Management District was chosen as the lead agency in the effort. Other organizations on the committee were the Miami Dade Office of Emergency Management, Miami-Dade Department of Environment Resources Management, the Florida Division of Emergency Management, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, URS Corporation, PBS&J and the municipalities along the waterway. An analysis was made of the entire county looking at such things as lane-miles of damage to roads, populations of the various hydrological basins, and flood damage claims filed with insurance companies, FEMA and the Small Business Administration. The results of the analysis pointed to the C-4 or Tamiami Canal basin as the place to start. The major components of the initiative are large pumps installed downstream of the flooded area to move outflow against an incoming tide; an emergency detention basin upstream of the flooded area to divert outflow before it enters the area; dredging and shaping of the canal between the basin and the pump to improve overall flow and pumps on the adjacent Miami River to keep the C-4 outflow from overwhelming the river discharge. Other components of the initiative include drainage projects in the C-4 basin municipalities and unincorporated areas of the county. 748 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-45 The Tamiami Canal (C-4) Forward Pump The forward pump on the C-4 or Tamiami Canal at Structure S25B is designed to push water flow downstream against the incoming tide thus allowing the system to continuously drain. It is actually three 54” pumps that together pump 600 cfi (cubic feet per second), which equals 4,500 gallons per second. This pump is the first element in the C-4 Basin Initiative and was constructed at a cost of $3,400,000 through the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program funded by FEMA-1345-DR-FL, the October 2000 “No-Name” storm. 749 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-46 The Miami River Forward Pump The forward pump at S-26 on the Miami River (C-6) is designed to counter the effects of the forward pump on the C-4 and prevent the C-4 Canal outflow from overwhelming the river thus causing flooding up-river. This pump, which also moves 600 cfi, is the second element in the C-4 Basin Initiative and was constructed at a cost of $5,200,000 through the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program funded by FEMA-1345-DR-FL. 750 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-47 The Emergency Detention Basin Pictured is the main pump station at the C-4 emergency detention basin (EDB). The EDB is made up of two reservoirs of nearly 500 acres each, which allows for approximately 4,000 acre/feet of water to be diverted from the C-4, which, in turn, creates increased holding capacity in the downstream section of the canal. The EDB is one more element in the C-4 Basin Initiative costing $5,500,000 from the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, FEMA-1345-DR-FL. 751 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-48 The EDB Supply Canal The supply canal is the link between the emergency detention basin and the C-4 Canal. The supply canal and the access bridge were built at a cost of $3,700,000 and were funded by the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program from FEMA-1345-DR-FL. An item of interest is that the bend in the supply canal at the point it enters the C-4 is to avoid an ancient Indian midden and burial ground. 752 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-49 The Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida The Miccosukee Indian Reservation is located in the C-4 Basin but upstream of the initiative improvements. To compensate, these large trailer mounted pumps were purchased at a cost of $100,000 and, when needed, are placed in strategic locations to reduce flooding. Funding is through the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program from FEMA- 1345-DR-FL. 753 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-50 The Sweetwater Berm In the mid-1980’s, the widening of U.S. 41, the Tamiami Trail, raised the elevation of the south bank of the C-4 or Tamiami Canal, which, in turn, caused an uneven distribution of floodwaters. This berm was constructed to bring the north bank back even with the south bank. A linear park with benches, a gazebo and a vitae course was added to enhance the project. This is another element in the C-4 Basin Initiative and was constructed at a cost of $967,000 through the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program funded by FEMA-1345-DR-FL. 754 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-51 Storm Water Control Most of the time, in Miami-Dade County, when you see these curb cuts what you have is a ground water recharge system, more commonly called a French drain. The photos below show you what’s underground. In 1998, Miami-Dade County passed a $70 million bond issue named QNIP, the Quality Neighborhoods Improvement Program, most of which was to relieve neighborhood flooding. Many QNIP dollars were used as project or global match for the C-4 Basin Initiative. Uninstalled Curb Cuts Catch Basins Perforated Pipe A Manhole 755 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-52 Other Mitigation Measures While window protection for windstorm and flood protection account for the bulk of the mitigation dollars spent in Miami-Dade County, they are by no means the only mitigation measures that are considered. It should be noted that many projects are sponsored by agencies other than FEMA. There are dune restoration projects and flood related studies in progress in Miami-Dade County that are funded though the NOAA Coastal Impact Assistance Program. Mitigation measures along the Intercoastal Waterway have been funded through the Florida Inland Navigation District. Wildfire mitigation through controlled or prescribed burns is sponsored by The Nature Conservancy, Florida Division of Forestry and the National Park Service. 756 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-53 Proper Tree Trimming Local Mitigation Strategy partners Miami-Dade County Cooperative Extension Service and the University of Florida’s Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences sponsor annual training classes for arborists and park and public works specialists in the proper way to prune trees for hurricane survival. Held annually since the year 2000, this program is presented in cooperation with the Miami-Dade Office of Emergency Management and the Local Mitigation Strategy Working Group. Before After 757 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-54 Miami River Community Benefit Issue Request (CBIR) from FY 2005, FY 2006 and FY2007 was used to dredge the Miami River shipping channel. $6,800,000 was funded for the federal channel and $5,200,000 for the non-federal or that part of the river to either side of the federal channel. 758 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-55 Hurricane Manual for Boaters This Hurricane Manual for Marine Interests was developed through the Florida Sea Grant program, a member of the Local Mitigation Strategy Working Group. It explains the proper ways to prepare boats for hurricanes and teaches marine safety for before, during and after a storm. The manual was funded through FEMA’s Project Impact. 759 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-56 Terrorism Mitigation The terrorism mitigation committee of the Local Mitigation Strategy concluded that the best way to fight terrorism is through the education of our children. This game, Home Free USA, was developed as a way to get the kid’s attention. It’s based on the federal security color chart and asks the student different questions about terrorism. Correct answers advance the player until he or she is “Home Free.” They are then taught what terrorism is, what it is not, and to be aware of terrorism without living in fear of it. Initially, a two-week social studies module has been devised and successfully tested in several schools. 760 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-57 Partnerships The Local Mitigation Strategy of Miami-Dade County promotes partnerships and works with many other agencies and organizations to promote mitigation activities. The members of the LMS Working Group come from our municipalities, our county departments, our colleges and universities, our public and private schools, our service organizations, our faith based community and our private sector companies and corporations. There are, on average, over one hundred people and over sixty organizations represented at any given meeting of the Local Mitigation Strategy Working Group. In some of the partnerships, the Local Mitigation Strategy is directly involved in coordinating efforts or funding measures or inter-organizational liaison and other such activities. In other cases, such as the National Flood Insurance Program’s Community Rating System or the High Velocity Hurricane Zone section of the Florida Building Code, the LMS supports the effort but is not directly involved in the activities. 761 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-58 Disaster Resistant Universities In 2001, the Federal Emergency Management Agency initiated the Disaster Resistant Universities(DRU) program and the University of Miami (above) was one of the charter members in the program and hosted the first DRU conference. In 2004, Florida International University entered into the program, as well. The program encourages colleges and universities nationwide to become active participants in hazard mitigation. In Miami-Dade County, the University of Miami and FIU are joined by St. Thomas University, Miami Dade College, Florida Atlantic University, Florida Memorial University, Johnson & Wales University, Barry University and the University of Florida as active participants in the Local Mitigation Strategy. 762 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-59 Alternate Spring Break This program gives college students a way to spend their spring break doing service to the community. In Miami-Dade County, The American Red Cross of Greater Miami and the Keys, Americorps, the Community Action Agency and the Miami-Dade Office of Emergency Management, all partners in the Local Mitigation Strategy, have brought the students here to install hurricane shutters on the homes of low-income elderly residents. 763 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-60 Miami-Dade Citizen Corps The Local Mitigation Strategy works to develop the Miami-Dade Citizen Corps and all its components. While some components are more fully developed than others, all will help put Miami-Dade in the forefront of the Citizen Corps national effort. The Citizen Corps brochure pictured above was funded by the Local Mitigation Strategy and Project Impact. 764 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-61 Miami-Dade CERT Teams The Local Mitigation Strategy works with the Miami-Dade Community Emergency Response Teams and provided the funding to purchase equipment for low-income teams and to print the CERT brochure. Miami-Dade’s CERT program is a national leader with close to 1,500 team members trained. 765 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-62 Hurricane Expo The Home Depot and Miami-Dade Fire Rescue help Insurance Commissioner Miami-Dade Fire Rescue Tom Gallagher helps Air Rescue helps Sponsored By Federal Alliance for Safe Homes The Home Depot Miami-Dade Office of Emergency Management 766 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-63 StormReady County Jim Lushine, left, of the National Weather Service’s (NWS) Miami Forecast Office presents the StormReady County sign to Frank Reddish, the LMS coordinator and Chuck Lanza, director of Miami-Dade Emergency Management. The NOAA and the National Weather Service have set down certain standards that must be met for a community to earn the right to call itself a StormReady Community. In 2008, Rob Molleda, left, of the NWS Miami Forecast Office, with LMS coordinator Frank Reddish and Emergency Management director Doug Bass, extends StormReady status for Miami-Dade County through the year 2011. Miami-Dade County was re- designated a StormReady Community in 2011-2013. Miami-Dade was renewed as a StormReady Community again in 2014. 767 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-64 National Flood Insurance Program Miami-Dade County has a CRS rating of 5 and strives to have every municipality within the county take part in the Community Rating System The Local Mitigation Strategy and the Department of Environment Resources Management 768 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-65 The Florida Building code The strong elements of the South Florida Building Code were retained in the new Florida Building Code as the “High Velocity Hurricane Zone” section of the code. Miami-Dade Building Department and the Miami-Dade Building Code Compliance Office (BCCO) led the effort to keep these strict standards in our county. For this effort, the Miami-Dade Building Code Compliance Office was awarded the national award for mitigation at the National Hurricane Conference in New Orleans in 2003. BCCO is a long-standing partner in the Local Mitigation Strategy. 769 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-66 International Hurricane Research Center The International Hurricane Research Center at Florida International University is a charter member of the Local Mitigation Strategy Working Group. The K-12 Project is designed to take the concept of mitigation to schoolchildren. The program consists of a series of workshops for teachers as well as mitigation expositions in schools. 770 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-67 Save a Life! Miami-Dade County has many lakes and canals and at least once a week a vehicle plunges into one, often costing lives. The life-saving tool pictured above combines a seat belt cutter, a flashlight and a center punch to break the vehicle window and escape. These devises are distributed by the Miami-Dade Office of Emergency Management and were funded through the Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy and Project Impact. 771 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-68 The Ring Shank Nail Professor Ricardo Alvarez and his research and development team at Florida International University recognized that the ring shank nail combined the lift resistance of screws with the shear strength of regular nails. Wind testing confirmed this and now use of the ring shank nail is included in the Florida Building Code and is required for roof installations throughout the High Velocity Hurricane Zone. Mr. Alvarez and FIU are charter members of the Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Working Group. 772 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-69 2013 Projects Reported as Completed In 2013 Miami-Dade LMS began tracking projects utilizing a new online system. In order to transition the list all projects that were in the 2012 Project list were transitioned to a spreadsheet and all stakeholders were asked to review, update and provide additional information. The result was an increased number of projects being reported as completed, even though some of them may have been done in previous years. The list provided here is of projects that were reported as completed by December 2013. The LMS Chair will continue to work on the archiving process and also try to identify more historical projects. Local Mitigation Strategy Project Status Reported 2013 Completed Projects Florida International University – Public Safety Code Plus Building Construction 750,000.00 Housing Authority of City of Miami Beach - Windstorm Protection for Rebecca Towers South 755,640.00 Housing Authority of City of Miami Beach - Housing Authority of City of Miami Beach North 755,640.00 Housing Authority of City of Miami Beach - Shutter 211 Collins 150,000.00 Housing Authority of City of Miami Beach - Replace Generator, Rebecca Towers South 100,000.00 Housing Authority of City of Miami Beach - Replace Generator, Rebecca Towers North 100,000.00 Miami Dade College – North Campus Building 1000 – Hurricane Shutters 374,200.00 Miami Dade College – Wolfson Campus Building 2000 – Hurricane Protection 200,000.00 Miami Dade Libraries – South Miami Repair Roofing System 250,000.00 Miami Dade Public Housing and Community Development – Claude Pepper- Wind Mitigation 1,013,336.00 Miami Dade Public Housing and Community Development –Peters Plaza - Wind Mitigation 401,751.00 Miami Dade Public Housing and Community Development – Kline Nunn – Wind Mitigation 1,051,693.00 Miami Dade Public Housing and Community Development –Newberg - Wind Mitigation 1,000,000.00 University of Miami - Multiple Building Gables – Wind Mitigation 1,000,000.00 University of Miami - Multiple Building Medical – Wind Mitigation 2,900,000.00 University of Miami - Marine Campus SLAB – Wind Mitigation 302,000.00 University of Miami – Multiple Building Medical – Wind Mitigation 2,950,000.00 University of Miami - Multiple Building Marine - Wind Mitigation 466,900.00 University of Miami - Multiple Building Gables - Wind Mitigation 1,800,000.00 773 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-70 Local Mitigation Strategy Project Status Reported 2013 University of Miami – Bascom Palmer Eye Institute – Wind Mitigation 3,400,000.00 Cutler Bay – Town Hall EOC Installation of Transfer Switch for Emergency Power 210,000.00 Cutler Bay – Acquisition of Emergency Generators Town Hall 394,000.00 Cutler Bay – Acquisition of Emergency Generators – Police Department Cutler Bay – Acquisition of Emergency Generators - Traffic Signals Key Biscayne - Stormwater Master Plan Update 150,000.00 Key Biscayne – Ocean Lane Drive – Drainage Wells 465,000.00 Miami Springs - Stormwater Master Plan 2,300,000.00 Miami Springs – Basin 14 – Drainage 654,480.00 Miami Springs – Basin 13 – Drainage 91,125.00 Miami Springs - Basin 19B – Drainage 364,500.00 Miami Springs – Basin 9 – Drainage 457,313.00 Miami Springs – Basin 25 – Drainage 747,225.00 Miami Springs - Shutters for Municipal Buildings 30,000.00 Miami Springs – Emergency Generator for Senior Center 350,000.00 Miami Springs – Storm Sewer Cleaning Program Improvements 350,000.00 Miami Gardens – Drainage Improvements NW 38 Court 121,000.00 Miami Gardens – Drainage Improvement NW 7 Ave Improvements new roads, drainage and median 5,200,000.00 Miami Gardens – Drainage Improvement NW 27 Ave and 207 Street 634,885.00 Miami Gardens – Venetian Gardens Drainage and Road Improvement NW 161 - 164 Street and 37-38 Place 315,800.00 Miami Gardens Secondary Canal Bank Stabilization and Sediment Removal Carol City Canals A and B, Real Site Canal and NW 17 Avenue Canal 1,300,000.00 Miami Gardens – Vista Verde Phase IA Area from NW 38-39 Avenue and NW 40 Ave Rd to NW 207 Street 670,885.70 Miami Gardens – Emergency Broadcast System 271,000.00 Miami Gardens - NW 191-193 Streets, 9th Ave – 10th Place – Drainage 233,752.00 Miami Gardens – NW 158-159 Street and NW 28 Place – 29 Court – Drainage 145,329.00 Miami Gardens – NW 194 Street and 21 Ave – Drainage 350,000.00 Miami Gardens – NW 175 Street and 12 Ave – Drainage 113,200.00 Miami Gardens – NW 38 Place and NW 208-209 Streets – Drainage 150,977.00 Miami Gardens - Bunche Park Neighborhood Revitalization Project 325,000.00 Miami Gardens – King’s Garden Phases I and II – Drainage 480,000.00 Miami Gardens – NW 171 Terrace from NW 44 Avenue to 45 Court – Drainage 225,000.00 Miami Gardens – Golden Glades Elementary School Swale Restoration 32,098.60 Miami Gardens – NW 17 Avenue and 194 Street Swale Restoration 3,500.00 774 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-71 Local Mitigation Strategy Project Status Reported 2013 Miami Gardens – NW 159 Drive and 12 Ave, East Swale Restoration 2,758.00 Miami Gardens - 441 From County Line South 100 feet – Drainage 68,700.00 Miami Gardens – NW 211 Street and 29 Court/30 Avenue, Inlets and Swale Restoration 30,000.00 Miami Gardens – NW 38 Court and 185 Street, Inlets and Swale Restoration 20,000.00 Miami Gardens – NW 167 and Palmetto East Ramp Road at NW 12 Avenue – Drainage and road improvements 366,070.00 Palmetto Bay -0 Drainage Improvements for Sub-Basin #10 790,000.00 Under Construction Jackson - Wind Retrofit Project at RTC 8,589,588.00 Jackson - Wind Retrofit Project at JRSC 601,281.00 Miami –Dade Public Works and Waste Management - Beach and Dune Restoration and Maintenance 3,200,000.00 Miami –Dade Public Works and Waste Management – 32nd Street Breakwater Rehabilitation and Stabilization 800,000.00 Miami –Dade Public Works and Waste Management – 55th Street Erosion Control Breakwater 1,700,000.00 Miami Dade College – Medical Center Building 1000 – Hurricane Shutters 200,000.00 Miami Dade College – Medical Center Building 2000 – Hurricane Protection 263,000.00 Miami Dade College – Hialeah Campus Building 1000 – Hurricane Protection 250,000.00 University of Miami - U of M Hospital – Wind Mitigation 4,100,000.00 Key Biscayne – Stormwater Outfall Rehabilitation - 50,000.00 Miami Lakes – Downtown Area Drainage Improvements 1,000,000.00 Miami Springs - Removal of Australian Pines – Wind Mitigation 14,000.00 El Portal – Stormwater Improvements 5,000,000.00 Palmetto Bay – Localized Drainage Improvements 900,000.00 Funded - Not Yet Started Jackson – Tank Farm Enclosure at JMH 498,420.99 Miami Dade Public Housing and Community Development – Haley Sofge Towers – Hurricane Shutters – Phase 1 1,000,000.00 Miami Dade Public Housing and Community Development – Haley Sofge Towers – Hurricane Shutters – Phase 2 1,000,000.00 Miami Dade Public Housing and Community Development – Ward Towers 1,000,000.00 Florida City – Rehabilitation of Friendland Manor Drainage System 192,000.00 Key Biscayne – Flap Gates at Outfalls – Drainage 626,700.00 Key Biscayne – Drainage Improvements on Fernwood Road and Hampton Road 465,275.00 Pinecrest – Purchase of Portable Two – Way Radios – Communications Redundancy 110,000.00 775 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-72 Local Mitigation Strategy Project Status Reported 2013 Pinecrest – Improvements to Pinecrest Gardens Banyan Bowl – Structural 50,000.00 Pinecrest – Improvements to Pinecrest Gardens Lower Garden - Dredging 30,000.00 Total Projects 82 Projects $69,775,023.29 776 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-73 2014 Projects Reported as Completed Local Mitigation Strategy Project Status Reported 12/2013-12/2014 Completed Projects Baptist Health South Miami Hospital Structure Enhancement 7,000,000.00 Cutler Bay Old Cutler Road JPA 7,524,319.00 Cutler Bay SW 216th Street and SW 97th Ave Traffic Circle 204,486.00 Cutler Bay SW 97th Ave Drainage Improvement 291,494.00 Cutler Bay Development of Floodplain Management Plan 120,000.00 Jackson Wind Retrofit Project at JRSC 601,281.00 Key Biscayne Village Hall Courtyard Improvement Demonstration Project 16,500.00 Miami Beach Belle Island Outfall Replacement 374,000.00 Miami Beach Sunset Islands I & II Drainage Improvements 1,916,000.00 Miami Beach Star Island Drainage Improvements 703,000.00 Miami Beach South Point II Drainage Improvements 2,000,000.00 Miami Beach City Center - Historic District Drainage Improvements 2,800,000.00 Miami Beach Parkview Canal Seawall Revetment 1,800,000.00 Miami Beach Biscayne Point Drainage Improvements 6,600,000.00 Miami Beach Lake Pancoast Area Drainage Improvements 1,600,000.00 Miami Beach Regional Communication/Command Van 500,000.00 Miami Gardens Drainage Improvement 151-159 Street and 27-32 Ave 258,500.00 Miami Gardens NW 171 Terrace from NW 44 Avenue to 45 Court 225,000.00 Miami Gardens Drainage Improvement NW 9 Ave., along NW 183- 185 Dr. to NW 7th Ave 17,000.00 Miami Gardens NW 178 Drive and 42-47 Avenues Outfall repairs and restoration 102,000.00 Miami Gardens Correct Stormwater Utility Fees for Commercial Properties 0.00 Miami Gardens Vista Verde Phase 1b area along NW 39 Aven from 207- 209 St 425,000.00 Miami Gardens Bridge Replacement 930,000.00 Miami Lakes Downtown Area Drainage Improvements 1,000,000.00 Miami Lakes NW 154th Street Widening from 83rd to 89th Avenues 1,700,000.00 Miami Springs Purchase and Install a Radio Repeater System 45,000.00 North Miami Beach NE 161 Street Drainage Improvement 350,000.00 North Miami Embankment stabilization at Keystone Point Bridge #2 1,800,000.00 North Miami Global Positioning System 12,000.00 North Miami Security for City Hall 62,750.00 Pinecrest Improvements to Pinecrest Gardens Banyan Bowl 50,000.00 Pinecrest Improvements to Pinecrest Gardens Lower Garden 30,000.00 Pinecrest Improvements to Pinecrest Gardens Generator 5,000.00 Public Housing and Community Development Newberg Windstorm Protection 1,923,900.00 777 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-74 Local Mitigation Strategy Project Status Reported 12/2013-12/2014 Public Housing and Community Development Claude Pepper Windstorm Protection 862,095.00 Public Housing and Community Development Jack Orr Plaza Windstorm Protection 900,000.00 Public Housing and Community Development Joe Moretti Plaza Windstorm Protection 2,592,000.00 Public Housing and Community Development Dante Fascell Windstorm Protection 422,800.00 South Miami Dorn Avenue Drainage Improvements 200,000.00 Completed Total # of Projects: 39 $ 47,970,125.00 Under Construction El Portal Village of El Portal Stormwater Improvements 5,000,000.00 Coral Gables Fire Station #3 Hurricane shutters 88,000.00 Cutler Bay Caribbean Boulevard JPA Project and Gap 1 11,173,054.00 Cutler Bay Flood Zone Data GIS System 140,000.00 Cutler Bay SW 212th Street 390,000.00 Hialeah Roadway/Stormwater Improvements ** Homestead Sidewalks/ Roadway Improvements 200,000.00 Homestead Upgrade OCB's (Oil Circuit Breakers) with VCB's (Vacuum Circuit Breakers) 200,000.00 Jackson Wind Retrofit Project at RTC 8,589,588.00 Key Biscayne Traffic Signage & Pavement Marking Improvements Master plan 40,000.00 Key Biscayne Stormwater outfall Rehabilitation 50,000.00 Key Biscayne Comprehensive Review of Local Laws and Regulations 5,000.00 Miami Dade College Hialeah Campus, bldg 1000 250,000.00 Miami Dade College Medical Cntr, bldg 2000 263,000.00 Miami Dade College Medical Cntr, bldg 1000 200,000.00 Miami Gardens Create GIS Layer for Storm Sewer Infrastructure 100,000.00 Miami Springs Removal of Australian Pines 14,000.00 Mount Sinai Protect Critical Services 2,000,000.00 North Miami Sanitary Sewer Backup 700,000.00 North Miami Flood Prevention and Mitigation: Drainage Basin13 500,000.00 North Miami Surge Resistance and Flood Mitigation at Keystone Point and Sans Souci 500,000.00 North Miami Beach Install Additional Storm Water Basins or Increase Existing Basins 60,000.00 North Miami Beach Construct Storm Water System that may include Injection Wells in Areas Prone to Flooding 120,000.00 778 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-75 Local Mitigation Strategy Project Status Reported 12/2013-12/2014 North Miami Beach Clean and Improve Drainage Systems 428,400.00 North Miami Beach Miami Industrial District Drainage and Roadway Improvement 800,000.00 North Miami Beach Eastern Shores Drainage Repair/Replacement 450,000.00 North Miami Beach Renovation of Eastern Shores Outfall Pipes 550,000.00 North Miami Beach NE 172nd Street Drainage Improvement 1,791,692.00 Palmetto Bay Flood Zone Data Maintenance: GIS System 100,000.00 Palmetto Bay Localized Drainage Improvements 900,000.00 Public Housing and Community Development Haley Sofge Towers Windstorm Protection 2,056,321.00 Public Housing and Community Development Haley Sofge Towers Window Replacement and Repair Concrete 1,000,000.00 Public Housing and Community Development Ward Tower Windstorm Protection 1,9240,000.00 Public Works and Waste Management 55th Street Erosion Control Breakwater 1,700,000.00 Public Works and Waste Management 32nd Street Breakwater Rehabilitation and Stabilization 800,000.00 Public Works and Waste Management Beach and Dune Restoration and Maintenance 3,200,000.00 Seaport Construction of New Seawall - Area 2 8,276,607.00 University of Miami U of Miami Hospital 4,100,000.00 Under Construction Total # of Projects: 39 $ 75,975,662.00 Funded - Not Yet Started Cutler Bay (joint project with Miami- Dade PWWM) Caribbean Boulevard Bridge Project 3,000,000.00 Doral Installation of Transfer Switch for Emergency Power 50,000.00 Doral Stormwater Improvements 5-Year CIP Year 2 1,017,150.00 Doral NW 33 Street from NW 82 Avenue to NW 79 Avenue Roadway Improvements 1,600,000.00 Florida City Rehabilitation of Friendland Manor Drainage System 192,000.00 Key Biscayne Coastal Dune Vegetation 10,000.00 Key Biscayne Flap Gates at Outfalls 626,700.00 Key Biscayne Drainage Improvements on Fernwood Road & Hampton Road 465,275.00 Key Biscayne New Stormwater Outfall Construction 210,000.00 Mount Sinai Code Plus Construction Enhancements New Medical Office Tower 3,750,000.00 Mount Sinai Protect the Power Supply 5,000,000.00 779 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-76 Local Mitigation Strategy Project Status Reported 12/2013-12/2014 Mount Sinai Code Plus Construction Energy Center Facility Protect Redundant Power Supply 250,000.00 North Miami Beach Dead End Eliminations 42,000.00 North Miami Beach Drainage in Alleyways 50,000.00 North Miami Beach Leak Detection Services 50,000.00 North Miami Beach Storm Water Pump Replacement Program 50,000.00 North Miami Beach Force Main Installations and Lift Stations Rehabilitations 125,000.00 North Miami Beach Pump Replacements 165,000.00 North Miami Beach Inflow and Infiltration Prevention 250,000.00 North Miami Beach Fire Flow Improvements 320,000.00 North Miami Beach Trenchless Pipe Replacements 325,000.00 North Miami Beach Roadway Improvements 327,000.00 North Miami Beach Storm Water Improvement City-Wide 336,885.00 North Miami Beach Aerial Pipe Crossings 350,000.00 Pinecrest Purchase of Portable Two-Way Radios 110,000.00 Public Housing and Community Development Dante Fascell 422,800.00 Public Housing and Community Development Haley Sofge Towers 2,056,321.00 Public Housing and Community Development Ward Tower 1,920,400.00 Public Works and Waste Management SW 157 AVE Canal Interconnect 1,003,311.98 Public Works and Waste Management NE 149 Street, from NE 10 Ave to NE 14 Ave 340,000.00 Public Works and Waste Management Larchmont Gardens Pump Station 1,671,841.00 Public Works and Waste Management NE 6 AVE& NE 185 Street; NE Miami CT, from NE 196- 198 ST; NW 22 AVE & NW 175 ST; North DR & NE 14 AVE 835,000.00 Public Works and Waste Management Seaboard Acres Pump Station 1,500,000.00 Public Works and Waste Management NW 19 Avenue and NW 84 Street 120,000.00 Public Works and Waste Management NW 39 Street and NW 25 Avenue 130,000.00 Funded - Not Yet Started # of Projects: 35 $28,671,683.98 Total Projects 113 $ 152,617,470.98 780 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-77 ** Project estimates were not available at time document went to print. 781 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-78 2015 Projects Reported as Completed Local Mitigation Strategy Project Status Reported 01/2015-12/31/2015 Completed Projects Funding Source Aventura NE 29 Place Phase 1 drainage work 425,000.00 FDEP Cutler Bay Caribbean Boulevard JPA project reduce flooding and increase traffic flow 11,173,054.00 CITT funds Cutler Bay SW 212 Street Drainage Improvements from SW 87 Ave to SW 85 Ave 850,000.00 TAP & FL Leg. Approp. Grant Emergency Management Arnold Hall South Engineering Study 50,000.00 State Shelter Retrofit Emergency Management Reilly Coliseum Engineering Study 50,000.00 State Shelter Retrofit Emergency Management Edwards Hall Engineering Study 50,000.00 State Shelter Retrofit Emergency Management Arnold and Edwards Connector Hall Engineering Study 50,000.00 State Shelter Retrofit Emergency Management Arnold Hall North Engineering Study 50,000.00 State Shelter Retrofit Florida City Generator for Underground Drainage for Friedland Manor 904,739.00 State Small City CDBG and City Funds Homestead EOC equipment to support activations 450,000.00 Capital Improvement Homestead Land acquisition for storm water drainage 3,000,000.00 Capital Improvement Homestead Retrofit of City Hall and EOC to Category 5 hurricanes. 3,958,500.00 HMGP, EOC Grant, General Fund Homestead Emergency generators for EOC 58,382.00 New City Hall Building fund Key Biscayne Erosion Control Implementation 10,000.00 Public Works General fund Key Biscayne Stormwater outfall rehabilitation on Harbor Drive 150,000.00 Stormwater Utility and grant Miami Training Center and back up EOC Elevator refurbishment 150,000.00 PDM Miami Brennan Channel marker replacement 65,000.00 * Miami Dade College Hialeah Campus installation of hurricane shutters/window protection Building 1000. 250,000.00 HMGP Mount Sinai Purchase twelve synchronized generators to protect patient power supply 5,000,000.00 Grants and Loans for Public Works and Development Facilities Mount Sinai Relocation of generators for energy facility into hurricane rated enclosure above storm surge 8,994,838.00 State DEM 782 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-79 Local Mitigation Strategy Project Status Reported 01/2015-12/31/2015 Mount Sinai Provide hurricane rated structures to protect power equipment and ensure connection to central energy plant 7,351,169.00 HMGP Completed Projects continued Funding Source Seaport Construction of New Seawall - Area 2 9,600,000.00 FDOT Seaport Storm Bollards 70,115.00 Seaport Funds Seaport Concrete Panels 619,858.00 Seaport Funds Sweetwater Stormwater Improvements Phase IIB North Project 1,600,000.00 US EPA, Miami Dade GOB University of Miami Hospital wind mitigation and roof tie downs 4,100,000.00 PDM Completed Total # of Projects: 26 $58,960,540.00 Under Construction Funding Source Bal Harbour IT Enhancements to hardware, software and security. 170,800.00 Capital Improvement Biscayne Park New Municipal/Public Safety Building 856,000.00 Grant Awarded Coral Gables Fire Station #3 Hurricane shutters 88,000.00 Capital Improvement Cutler Bay Reduction of Floating Debris 60,000.00 Funding Secured Cutler Bay Portable Traffic Control Signs 200,000.00 Grant Cutler Bay Flood Zone Data GIS System 140,000.00 Stormwater Utility Fees Cutler Bay Municipal AM Emergency Radio Broadcast Station 85,000.00 Grant Cutler Bay Removal of Australian Pines and other Exotics 85,000.00 Town Budget Cutler Bay Emergency Portable Air Conditioner Units 120,000.00 Grant El Portal Village of El Portal Stormwater Improvements 10,000,000.00 Capital Improvement Hialeah Roadway/Stormwater Improvements (SE 4 ST to HIA DR from 6-8 AVE) 151,469.00 City Capital Improvement Hialeah Gardens Central District Drainage Improvements 2,500,000.00 Capital Improvement Homestead Upgrade OCB's (Oil Circuit Breakers) with VCB's (Vacuum Circuit Breakers) 150,000.00 Capital Improvement Homestead Improve Transportation Infrastructure 2,000,000.00 Miami-Dade County Roads and State of Florida Roads Homestead Wastewater Infiltration/Inflow 2,400,000.00 Capital Improvement Homestead Sidewalks/ Roadway Improvements 200,000.00 Capital Improvement Plan Homestead Improvements to Existing Buildings 500,000.00 Capital Improvement Homestead New Sewer Mains 2,000,000.00 Capital 783 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-80 Local Mitigation Strategy Project Status Reported 01/2015-12/31/2015 Improvement Homestead Sewer lines in the Northwest Neighborhood and the West Industrial Area 3,300,000.00 Capital Improvement Homestead Installation of storm shutters and/or Impact Resistant Windows at different locations 1,000,000.00 Capital Improvement Homestead Police Station Security/Hardening 50,000.00 Bond Issue Under Construction continued Funding Source Homestead City Hall Security Enhancement 60,000.00 New City Hall building fund Homestead Customer Service & Finance Secuirty Enhancement 65,000.00 New City Hall Building Fund Jackson Wind Retrofit Project at RTC 8,589,588.00 FEMA Grant Key Biscayne Traffic Signage & Pavement Marking Improvements Master plan 40,000.00 Capital Improvement Key Biscayne Comprehensive Review of Local Laws and Regulations 5,000.00 Stormwater Utility Fund Miami Beach Venetian Islands Drainage Improvements 9,100,000.00 Grant Applied For Miami Beach Drainage Hot Spots ** Grant Miami Beach Venetian Islands – Neighborhood Improvements ** Grant Miami Beach Sunset Islands 3 & 4 – Neighborhood Improvements ** Grant Miami Beach Lower North Bay Road – Neighborhood Improvements ** Grant Miami Beach Citywide Dune Restoration & Enhancement Project 400,000.00 Grant Miami Gardens Create GIS Layer for Storm Sewer Infrastructure 100,000.00 * Miami Springs Removal of Australian Pines 14,000.00 Other Internal Funding Mount Sinai Code Plus Construction Enhancements Surgical Tower 6,500,000.00 FEMA North Miami Flood Prevention and Mitigation: Drainage Basin13 500,000.00 Capital Improvement North Miami Sanitary Sewer Backup 700,000.00 Capital Improvement North Miami Surge Resistance and Flood Mitigation at Keystone Point and Sans Souci 500,000.00 Capital Improvement North Miami Beach NE 172nd Drainage Improvement 17,916.92 Capital Improvement North Miami Beach Install Additional Storm Water Basins or Increase Existing Basins 60,000.00 Capital Improvement North Miami Beach Construct Storm Water System that may include Injection Wells in Areas Prone to Flooding 120,000.00 Capital Improvement North Miami Beach Clean and Improve Drainage Systems 428,400.00 Capital Improvement North Miami Beach Eastern Shores Drainage Repair/Replacement 450,000.00 Capital 784 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-81 Local Mitigation Strategy Project Status Reported 01/2015-12/31/2015 Improvement Palmetto Bay Flood Zone Data Maintenance: GIS System 100,000.00 Capital Improvement Palmetto Bay Localized Drainage Improvements 900,000.00 Capital Improvement Public Housing And Community Development Ward Tower 1,920,400.00 Capital Improvement Under Construction continued Funding Source Public Housing and Community Development Haley Sofge Towers 1,000,000.00 Capital Improvement Public Housing and Community Development Haley Sofge Towers 2,056,321.00 Capital Improvement Sweetwater South Florida Water Management District Flood Protection Berm 1,000,000.00 SFWMD West Miami Impact Resistant Windows for City Hall 52,000.00 CDBG Under Construction Total # of Projects: 50 $ 60,732,894.92 Funded - Not Yet Started MD Public Works SW 157 AVE Canal Interconnect ** Capital Improvement Aventura Stormwater Drainage Projects ** Capital Improvement Coral Gables Basin Inflow and Infiltration Upgrade 1,179,793.00 Other Internal Funding Cutler Bay Preventive Pruning of Existing Town Tree Inventory 285,000.00 Budgeted F.Y. 2015 - 2016 Cutler Bay Debris Removal 400,000.00 * Cutler Bay Storm Water Outfalls 500,000.00 Stormwater Utility Fund Doral Installation of Transfer Switch at Morgan Levy Park for Emergency Power 50,000.00 City General Fund Doral Stormwater Improvements 5-Year CIP: Year 2 1,017,150.00 State of Florida legislation Doral NW 33 St. from NW 82 Ave. to NW 79 Ave. Roadway Improvements 1,600,000.00 FDEP Grant Hialeah Roadway Reconstruction (W 8-10 Ave from W 31- 33 Street) 1,625,000.00 Storm Sewer Homestead New Sewer Mains: To upgrade sewer main/lines to eliminate raw sewage from leaking into the water table. 2,000,000.00 City General Fund - Secured Jackson JMH Campus Wide Roof Replacement 2,500,000.00 CDBG Jackson Utility/Energy Center at JMH 5,290,000.00 Capital 785 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-82 Local Mitigation Strategy Project Status Reported 01/2015-12/31/2015 Improvement Jackson Emergency Switchgear Replacements at JNMC 6,950,000.00 Jackson's Bond Referendum 11/05/2013 Jackson Volt Oil Switch Replacements 7,350,000.00 GOB 2005 & Jackson's Bond Referendum 11/05/2013 Key Biscayne Coastal Dune Vegetation 10,000.00 Capital Improvement Key Biscayne New Stormwater Outfall Construction 210,000.00 Stormwater Improvement Fund Funded - Not Yet Started continued Key Biscayne Drainage Improvements on Fernwood Road & Hampton Road 465,275.00 Stormwater Utility Fund Capital Expenditures Key Biscayne Flap Gates at Outfalls (Backflow Prevention) 600,000.00 Other Internal Funding MD Public Works NW 19 Avenue and NW 84 Street 120,000.00 Internal Funding MD Public Works NW 39 Street and NW 25 Avenue 130,000.00 Internal Funding MD Public Works NE 6 AVE& NE 185 Street; NE Miami CT, from NE 196-198 ST; NW 22 AVE & NW 175 ST; North DR & NE 14 AVE 835,000.00 Stormwater Utility Capital Expenditures MD Public Works Seaboard Acres Pump Station 1,500,000.00 FDOT - MD Public Works Larchmont Gardens Pump Station 1,671,841.00 Other Internal Funding MD Public Works NE 149 Street, from NE 10 Ave to NE 14 Ave 340,000.00 Mount Sinai Code Plus Construction Energy Center Facility Protect Redundant Power Supply 250,000.00 Other Internal Funding Mount Sinai Code Plus Construction Enhancements New Medical Office Tower 3,750,000.00 Other Internal Funding Mount Sinai Elevate Seawall 7,000,000.00 Private and bond funding. North Miami Beach Dead End Eliminations 42,000.00 Capital Improvement North Miami Beach Drainage in Alleyways 50,000.00 Capital Improvement North Miami Beach Leak Detection Services 50,000.00 Capital Improvement North Miami Beach Storm Water Pump Replacement Program 50,000.00 Capital Improvement North Miami Beach Force Main Installations and Lift Stations Rehabilitations 125,000.00 Capital Improvement North Miami Beach Pump Replacements 165,000.00 Capital Improvement 786 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-83 Local Mitigation Strategy Project Status Reported 01/2015-12/31/2015 North Miami Beach Inflow and Infiltration Prevention 250,000.00 CIP Capital Improvement North Miami Beach Fire Flow Improvements 320,000.00 Capital Improvement North Miami Beach Trenchless Pipe Replacements 325,000.00 Capital Improvement North Miami Beach Roadway Improvements 327,000.00 Capital Improvement North Miami Beach Storm Water Improvement City-Wide 336,885.00 Capital Improvement North Miami Beach Aerial Pipe Crossings 350,000.00 Capital Improvement Pinecrest Purchase of Portable Two-Way Radios 110,000.00 Internal Funding Virginia Gardens VG - NW 40 street Stormwater Improvement Project 500,000.00 Other Internal Funding Funded - Not Yet Started continued Virginia Gardens VG - 66 avenue storm drain, ADA, and road widening project 650,000.00 Capital Improvement Funded - Not Yet Started # of Projects: 43 $ 51,281,944.00 Total Projects 129 $ 170,975,378.92 * Funding source not provided ** Project estimates were not available at time document went to print. 787 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-84 2016 Projects Reported as Completed Local Mitigation Strategy Project Status Reported 01/2016-12/31/2016 Completed Projects Cost Funding Source Cutler Bay SW 216th Street and SW 97th Ave Traffic Circle 204,486.00 Town Homestead New Sewer Mains 2,000,000.00 CIP Homestead Installation of storm shutters and/or Impact Resistant Windows at different locations 1,000,000.00 CIP Homestead Customer Service & Finance Security Enhancement 65,000.00 City Hall Build. Fund Homestead Portable mobile pumps 500,000.00 CIP Homestead Storm water telemetry system 900,000.00 CIP Homestead City Hall Security Enhancement 60,000.00 New City Hall building fund Homestead Secure three (3) existing water tanks from structural damage 600,000.00 CIP Jackson JMH Campus Wide Roof Replacement 2,500,000.00 Bond Referendum Key Biscayne Traffic Signage & Pavement Marking Improvements Master plan 40,000.00 CIP Key Biscayne Village K-8 Center Stormwater Pump Station 350,000.00 Stormwater Utility Fund Miami Training Center Elevator Refurbishment 150,000.00 PDM Miami Beach Lower North Bay Road – Neighborhood Improvements 14,000,000.00 City of Miami Beach Miami Lakes Lake Martha Drainage Improvements 1,260,000.00 Secured Palmetto Bay Drainage Improvements for Sub-Basin # 6 490,000.00 Stormwater Utility Palmetto Bay Drainage Improvements for Sub-Basin # 3 250,000.00 Stormwater Utility/ Grant Palmetto Bay Localized Drainage Improvements 900,000.00 Stormwater Utility/Grant Palmetto Bay Back-Up Generators and Transfer Switches 75,000.00 Special Rev. Funds M-D Public Works SW 82 Ave from Flagler to SW 2 St 109,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works Miller Road Drainage Retrofit 368,063.00 SWU M-D Public Works NE 146 St between NE 12 Ave and NE 14 Ave 216,880.91 SWU M-D Public Works Starlight Development, Ph. I Drainage Improvement (NW 207 Dr - NW 206 Ter from NW 44 Ct - 47 Ave) 682,280.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Repetitive Loss Area - Arch Creek 4,528,519.02 QNIP M-D Public Works Drainage Improvement Project Multiple Sites - NW 69 Street from NW 32 Avenue to NW 35 Ave; NW 75 Street and NW 16 Ave ;SW 116 Ave and SW 185 Street ;SW 115 Ave & SW 185 St 250,000.00 UNKNOWN 788 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-85 Local Mitigation Strategy Project Status Reported 01/2016-12/31/2016 Completed Projects Cost Funding Source M-D Public Works NW 185-191 St & NW 44-47 Ave (King's Gardens) [MP 8020, 8023, 623] 722,381.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works NPDES OUTFALL (53-41-12-NE001C) 386,747.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works NW 178 Street to NW 176 Street from NW 82 Avenue to NW 78 Avenue Drainage Improvement Project (Norman and Jean Beach Park ROW Drainage 650,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works NPDES OUTFALL North Miami Ave from NE 91 St to Little River Canal 141,923.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works NW 178 Terrace from NW 47 Avenue to NW 48 Court Drainage Improvement Project 116,275.00 SWU M-D Public Works NW 191 St from NW 2 -9 Ave Drainage Improvement 401,695.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works NW 20 St. from NW 33 -37 Ave 401,695.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works NW 20 Street and NW 15 Avenue 146,519.41 SWU M-D Public Works NW 27-32 Ave & NW 191-199 St 229,694.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works NW 35 Avenue from NW 73 Street to NW 74 Street Drainage Improvement Project. 126,228.00 SWU M-D Public Works NW 46 St to NW 53 St from NW 17-24 Ave (Allapatah, Phase II) [ 9060,9123] 873,000.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works NW 46 St to NW 54 St from NW 32 Ave to NW 35 Ave [624,7081,7080] 245,129.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works NW 53 Terrace from NW 69 Avenue to NW 72 Avenue 247,989.99 SWU M-D Public Works Oleta River - NE 183 Terrace from NE 23 Court to NE 24 Avenue 183,326.00 SWU M-D Public Works Palm Springs North, Phase I 435,739.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Palm Springs North, Phase II 340,423.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Palm Springs North, Phase III 261,205.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Pump Stations Improvement Service Contract (various pump stations sites) 500,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works PWD Project No. 20070696) 2,981,645.00 RIF M-D Public Works PWD Project No. 20090089 JPA with Town of Cutler Bay PTP 519,794.00 JPA with Town of Cutler Bay PTP M-D Public Works Queen's Park Drainage Improvements, NW 114 St & NW 19 Ave 48,894.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Rucks Park Pump Station Improvements (NE 138 St & NE 4 Ave) [S:\ 4030, 610] 540,000.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works S.W. 82nd Avenue between S.W. 48th Street & S.W. 56th Street Drainage Improvement 65,877.00 SWU M-D Public Works San Mateo, Phase I (NW 67 - 74 Ave from NW 169 Ter - 167 St) [8060] [780] 546,000.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works San Mateo, Phase II (NW 82 - 87 Ave from NW 170 - 171 ST) [8060] 441,000.00 QNIP/SWU 789 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-86 Local Mitigation Strategy Project Status Reported 01/2016-12/31/2016 Completed Projects Cost Funding Source M-D Public Works San Mateo, Phase III (NW 78 - 82 Ave from NW 170 - NW 171 ST) [8060] 626,100.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works San Sebastian Drainage Improvement Project - SW 42 Street to SW 47 Street between SW 132 Avenue to SW 133 Avenue 911,000.00 QNIP/SWU/G OB M-D Public Works San Sebastian Phase I Drainage Improvement Project - SW 42 Street to SW 47 Street between SW 132 Ave - SW 133 Ave 286,000.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works San Simeon Way from NE 215 ST to NE 205 ST 729,145.00 SWU M-D Public Works Seaboard Acres Ditch Enclosure (NE 4 Ave from NE 141 St & 142 St) 350,000.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Serena Lakes and Stonewood Area: SW 137 CT from SW 181 ST to SW 181 TER 50,731.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Serena Lakes and Stonewood Area: SW 138 PL- 138 CT from SW 180 ST to SW 184 ST 133,241.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Serena Lakes and Stonewood Area: SW 139 PL- 139 Path from SW 180 ST to 184 ST 262,078.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Serena Lakes and Stonewood Area: SW 144 PL from SW 172 ST to Cul de Sac (Additional Site) 29,175.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Serena Lakes and Stonewood Area: SW 168 ST from SW 141 CT to SW 143 Pl (Site 9) 122,278.00 QNIP/SWU -D Public Works Serena Lakes, SW 137 - 142 Ave & SW 180 - 172 St. 1,628,829.00 SWU M-D Public Works South Miami Ave from SW 21 Rd to SW 25 Rd 495,429.00 SWU M-D Public Works South Miami, Phase 1-C / Phase 2 (SW 62 Ave - SW 74 Ave from SW 40 St - SW 50 St) [3081,3086] 846,726.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Starlight Development, Ph. 2 Drainage Improvement (NW 207 Dr - 200 St from NW 39 Ct - 44 Ct) [S:\ 615,6005,6020, 6000] 687,654.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Streamland Gardens Drainage Improvement Project (NW 32 AV & NW 24 ST RD) 195,431.73 SWU M-D Public Works Sunshine Industrial Park Drainage Improvement Project (NW 159 Drive between NW 8 Ave to NW 12 Ave) 600,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works SW 100 Avenue and SW 30 Street Drainage Improvement Project (10010 SW 30 Street) 50,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works SW 100 Terrace and SW 117 Avenue Drainage Improvement Project (11624 SW 100 Terrace) 100,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works SW 122nd Avenue & SW 10th Street {340} ** SWU M-D Public Works SW 128 ST FROM SW 122 AVE TO THE CUL-DE- SAC 177,214.00 SWU M-D Public Works SW 94 Avenue between SW 8 Street to SW 15 St. 312,150.95 SWU M-D Public Works SW 95 Street and SW 112 Avenue 50,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works SW 129 Ave - 135 Ave & SW 256 St - 268 St (Meadowood/Cedar Creek Phase II) 308,900.00 QNIP/SWU 790 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-87 Local Mitigation Strategy Project Status Reported 01/2016-12/31/2016 Completed Projects Cost Funding Source M-D Public Works SW 134 Avenue and SW 26 Street (Matos) 30,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works SW 137 Ave between SW 56 St and SW 72 St 592,190.21 ARRA/SWU M-D Public Works SW 139 Ave from SW 8 to SW 42 St [9070] 1,795,000.00 SWU/QNIP M-D Public Works SW 176 Terr and SW 142 Ct ( 14242 SW 176 Terr) 100,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works SW 2 St & SW 136 Pl 57,810.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works SW 21 Street between SW 67 Avenue and SW 71 Avenue (7036-38 SW 21 St) 82,829.91 SWU M-D Public Works SW 252 Ter - 256 St & SW 124 Ave - SW 127 Ave (Meadowood/Cedar Creek Phase III) 554,716.41 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works SW 260 ST from SW 139 Ave to SW 139 CT 372,560.00 Drainage Improvements M-D Public Works SW 34 St and SW 89 CT 83,561.00 SWU M-D Public Works SW 60 STREET & SW 70 AVENUE (6015 SW 70 AVENUE) 120,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works SW 64 St & SW 67 Ave {5095} 85,050.00 SWU M-D Public Works SW 70 Avenue to SW 71 Avenue from SW 12 Street to SW 13 Street – Drainage Improvement 319,748.00 GOB M-D Public Works SW 12 Street and SW 73 Place Drainage Improvement Project 110,400.00 SWU M-D Public Works SW 73 Avenue and SW 12 Street 59,053.00 SWU M-D Public Works SW 74 Avenue from SW 42 Street to Rail Road Crossing 322,317.86 SWU M-D Public Works SW 76 Avenue from SW 10 Street to SW 12 Street 111,705.00 GOB/SWU M-D Public Works SW 82 Street from SW 76 Ave to SW 74 Ave 11,500.00 SWU M-D Public Works SW 87 AVE & SW 200 ST 163,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works SW 89 Avenue and SW 131 Street - Drainage Improvement Project 278,034.00 GOB 77456 M-D Public Works SW 97 Ct & SW 1 St 18,859.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Swale Blocks at NE 172 ST & NE 10 AVE 70,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works N.W. 17th Avenue between N.W. 29th Street & N.W. 35th Street Drainage Improvement Project 60,920.54 PTP/SWU M-D Public Works NE 15 court between NE 205 st & NE 199 St 326,569.28 SWU M-D Public Works NE 171 Street and NE 11 Court Drainage Improvement Project 125,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works NE 147 St from NE 12 - 14 Ave 120,000.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works NE 131 Lane and NE 16 Avenue 150,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works NW 27 Avenue and NW 21 Street Drainage Improvement Project 193,587.00 SWU M-D Public Works NW 12 Avenue from NW 186 St to NW 195 St Drainage Improvement 223,225.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works NW 10 Ave from NW 103 ST-NW 100 ST 69,260.08 SWU M-D Public Works NPDES OUTFALL NW 22 Ave from NW 124 St - 139 St 664,196.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works North Miami Avenue from NE 87 St. to 105 St. 157,785.32 WO# 1 791 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-88 Local Mitigation Strategy Project Status Reported 01/2016-12/31/2016 Completed Projects Cost Funding Source M-D Public Works New Little River Drainage Improvement Project 482,816.23 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works NE 89th Street & Bayshore Drive 340,308.91 SWU M-D Public Works NE 88 Terr from Biscayne Blvd to east end of road 55,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works NE 5 Court and NE 147 Street (14730 NE 5 Court) 15,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works NE 5 Avenue from NE 143 Street to NE 145 Street Drainage Improvement Project. 120,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works NE 2nd Avenue between NE 116th Street and NE 117th Street Drainage Improvement Project 195,125.24 SWU M-D Public Works Palm Springs North, Phase IV (NW 170 St - 181 Terr from NW 75 Pl - 79 Ave 122,598.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Oak Brooke - SW 160 Street - SW 180 Street between SW 102 - SW 112 Avenue 2,074,318.42 SWU M-D Public Works NW 46 Street to NW 52 Street from NW 35 Ave to NW 37 Ave 903,329.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works NW 109 Street from NW 11 Avenue to NW 10 Avenue 159,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works NW 93 Street and Little River Boulevard Drainage Improvement Project 166,764.65 SWU M-D Public Works NW 67 Street from NW 32 Aveto NW 33 Ave 190,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works NW 65 St W/O NW 18 Ave 34,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works NW 143 Street from NW 7-17 Ave 261,251.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works NW 82 Avenue from West Flagler Street to NW 3 Street MIDWAY ADDITION Phase I 325,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works OCL1-103, C-8 Basin Project (NW 22 Ave from SR 9 to N. Burlington St) 145,200.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works NW 99 Street from NW 21 Avenue to NW 22 Avenue Drainage Improvement Project 93,492.00 SWU M-D Public Works NW 117 St From NW 12 Ave to NW 14 Ave Drainage Improvements 120,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works NE 214 Street and NE 20 Court 100,000.00 SWU PTP M-D Public Works NE 208 Terr. & NE 26 Ave. Drainage Improvement 106,268.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works NE 201 Street and NE 25 Avenue Drainage Improvement Project 30,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works SW 128 ST from SW 127 Ave and SW 125 Ave 15,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works NE 18 PL from NE 211th Terrace to NE 214th Terrace 623,891.52 SWU M-D Public Works SW 31 Street from SW 65 Avenue to SW 67 Avenue Drainage Improvement Project 124,281.00 SWU M-D Public Works SW 160 Terr from SW 139 Ave to SW 140 Ct, 95,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works SW 288-296 St & SW 152-157 Ave (Leisure City, Phase I & Phase II) 984,854.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works SW 27 Avenue from US-1 to Bayshore Drive (Phases I & II) 4,039,657.00 PTP 792 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-89 Local Mitigation Strategy Project Status Reported 01/2016-12/31/2016 M-D Public Works NW 96 ST FROM NW 13 AVE TO NW 14 AVE 119,660.00 SWU Completed Projects Funding Source M-D Public Works NW 95 Street from NW 2nd Avenue to NW 6th Avenue 540,357.00 SWU M-D Public Works NW 95 Terr Between NW 13 Ave to NW 14 Ave 64,579.24 SWU M-D Public Works NW 78 Ave to NW 84 Ave from NW 7 ST to NW 10 Midway Pump Station 4,965,866.25 GOB/SWU M-D Public Works NW 82 Avenue from NW 3 Street to NW 7 Street (Midway Add. Phase II) and NW 3 Street from NW 82 Avenue to NW 84 Avenue (Midway Add. Phase III) 598,306.00 SWU / QNIP M-D Public Works NW 41 St to NW 54 St from NW 19-24 Ave (Allapatah, Phase I 2,973,676.50 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works NW 65 St E/O NW 18 Ave 42,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works NW 64 St from NW 21 Ave to NW 20 Ave 44,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works NW 50 St from NW 69 Ave to NW 72 Ave 100,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works NW 101 ST from NW 23 AVE to NW 22 AVE 112,529.41 SWU M-D Public Works NW 105 Terrace from NW 11 Avenue to NW 12 Avenue 80,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works NW 105 Street and NW 19 104,978.33 SWU M-D Public Works NW 106 Street from NW 12 Ave to NW 10 Ave 270,366.00 GOB/SWU M-D Public Works NE 110 Street from NE 2 to NE 3 Ave Drainage Improvement Project 60,920.54 SWU M-D Public Works Telemetry Network Installation including 28 Satellite Canal Level Recorders and Rain Gauges 1,100,000.00 GOB/SWU M-D Public Works The Tropics Drainage Improvements (NW 35 Ave - NW 36 Ave from NW 97 St - NW 101 St) 98,382.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Tropical Estates Phase 3- SW 99 Ct to SW 102 Ave from SW 52 Terr to SW 55 St 330,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works Tropical Estates Phase 4 SW 98 Avenue to SW 102 Avenue from SW 48 Street to SW 51 Terrace 229,120.00 SWU M-D Public Works Tropical Estates Sub. Phase 1 & 2 - SW 56 Street to SW 49 Street from SW 97 Ave to SW 98 Court 438,927.00 SWU M-D Public Works Twin Lakes (CC7-N-10, Project 9), Phase I / Twin Lakes, Phase 2 (NW 99 St - NW 102 St NW 12 – 14 Ave - NW 14 Ave 460,857.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works West Miami Lakes, Phase II [3065B] 306,158.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Wynona Park Drainage Improvement (NW 7 - 8 St from NW 72 - 76 Ave) [602] 327,683.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Highland Lakes Blvd., Ph. III 609,331.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Highland Lakes, Ph. I-A, I-B-1& I-B-2 561,597.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works J. G. Head Farms, SW 26 - 40 St. & SW 127 - 132 Ave 746,709.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works JG Head Farms Phase II C 1,350,180.00 GOB/SWU M-D Public Works Miami River Outfall Retrofit, Basin 21 2,600,000.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Country Lake Manors, Sec. 2 Drainage 317,505.00 QNIP/SWU 793 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-90 Local Mitigation Strategy Project Status Reported 01/2016-12/31/2016 Improvement (NW 200 St - NW 201 Ln from NW 57 Ct - NW 58 Pl) Completed Projects Cost Funding Source M-D Public Works CRS RL-6 Drainage Improvement 182,477.76 SWU M-D Public Works Coral Gables Waterway Canal, Phase II, III ,IV,V,VI & VII. Agreement 2. 0 SWU M-D Public Works Larchmont Backflow Preventors 82,000.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Country Walk (Basin 3) [5071 B, 614, 5071A] 565,582.00 SWU M-D Public Works Country Walk (Basin 5) [5073a, 5073] 981,869.00 SWU M-D Public Works Country Walk Site 1 (SW 152 Ct from SW 150 St - 151 Ter) 123,300.00 SWU M-D Public Works Country Walk (Basin 6) [641, 5074] 1,154,809.00 SWU M-D Public Works Ives Dairy Rd. & NW 199 St Pollution Control Structure 61,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works Coral Way & Granada 30,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works 193 Polygon 221A Coral Gables Waterway Canal, Phase VIII, IX, X, XI & XII, XIII, XIV, XV,XVI. 6,533,000.00 SWU/NRCS Grant M-D Public Works HIGHLAND LAKES PHASE 4 263,225.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Country Walk (Basin 7) [641, 5074] 1,154,809.00 SWU M-D Public Works Highland Lakes, Ph. II 171,866.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Kendall Point Drainage Improvement (SW 86 Ave - SW 83 Ave from SW 87 St - SW 84 St) 676,979.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Melrose St 130,000.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Leisure City Phase I 29,300.00 SWU M-D Public Works LAKES OF ACADIA 141,784.71 SWU M-D Public Works Country Walk (Basin 2) 565,582.00 SWU M-D Public Works Coral Gables Loop Phase 1 & 2 800,000.00 SWU/NRCS/SF WMD M-D Public Works Broadmor Manor (NW 102 Street from NW 22 Avenue to NW 24 Avenue) 120,965.40 SWU M-D Public Works Biltmore Park 695,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works Belen Phase IIIA 1,600,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works Belen Phase I 1,328,614.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Bel-Aire Drainage Improvements (SW 184 - 190 St from SW 82 - 97 Ave) 1,337,000.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Basin 4 877,200.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works 234 Polygon 280A American Homes Drainage Improvement (SW 152 St - SW 157 St from SW 144 Ct -Black Creek Canal) [1011] QNIP/SWU SW 144 Ave & SW 154 Terr C1-C-12 C-1 C-1 562,029.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Meadow Wood Phase 4A 701,583.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Miami River Outfall Retrofit, Basin 23, Ph. 1 & 2 842,873.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Belen Phase III 2,600,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works Carol City Canal Culvert at NW 39 Ave and NW 199 ST. 755,734.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Coral Way to Bird Road SW 67 Ave to SW 72 Ave 102,785.00 SWU M-D Public Works Drainage Improvement Project Multiple Sites 41,382.00 SWU 794 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-91 Local Mitigation Strategy Project Status Reported 01/2016-12/31/2016 (SW 118 Ave and SW 10 ST) Completed Projects Cost Funding Source M-D Public Works Driveway approach reconstruction near NW 52 Avenue and NW 190 Street 5,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works Brownsville Site 2, 3125 NW 48 TERR 93,501.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Brownsville Site No. 5, 4500 NW 33 Ave 75,000.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Blue Lagoon from NW 57 Ave to NW 62 Ave Drainage Improvements 432,584.00 SWU M-D Public Works Arch Creek Estates Drainage Improvements (NE 142 - 149 St from NE 14 - 18 Ave) 4,720,000.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works NW 22 CT FROM NW 128 ST TO EAST GOLF DR. 32,191.00 SWU M-D Public Works Lawrence Waterway @ NW 7 St / 18 Ave. 73,063.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Miller Dr. from SW 132 AVE to SW 134 PL 200,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works Brownsville Site No. 6, 3295 NW 43 Terr 69,000.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works 13200 block of SW 6 ST 19,000.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Brownsville Site 1, 79,283.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Mini-Warehouses Drainage Improvement 59,569.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works High Pines Phase II 2,300,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works Drainage Retrofit of Arterial Roadways Project 800,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works Drainage Improvement Project Multiple Sites 222,860.00 SWU M-D Public Works Drainage Improvement Project for NW 97 Ave 327,813.97 SWU M-D Public Works CRS# RL-1 Munne Subdivision 1,524,555.00 SWU M-D Public Works CRS# RL-1 Lormar Subdivision 736,570.64 SWU M-D Public Works Country Walk Site 3 (SW 144 St - SW 148 Ter from SW 152 Ave - 153 Pl) 432,674.00 SWU M-D Public Works Country Walk Basin 1 (SW 150 St-151 Ter from SW 144 Ct-151 Ave) 1,074,689.00 SWU M-D Public Works Coral Way Homesites (SW 80 Avenue from SW 30 Street to SW 28 Street and SW 30 Street from SW 81 Avenue to SW 79 Court) 1,029,202.00 SWU M-D Public Works Coral Way Drainage Retrofit - SW 26 Street Between SW 119 Avenue to Florida Turnpike 246,736.00 SWU M-D Public Works Central Miami Drainage Improvement Project - (SW 38 ST FROM SW 75 AV TO S. LAKE DR. between SW 73 CT FROM SW 38 ST TO SW 39 ST) 203,520.00 SWU M-D Public Works C802-204, C-8 Basin Project (NW 22 Ave from SR 9 to Biscayne Canal) 400,000.00 QNIP/SWU M-D Public Works Brickell Area Drainage Improvement Project (South Miami Avenue b/t SE 14th to SE 10st St & SW 2nd Avenue b/t SW 11st to SW 9th St.) 542,894.92 SWU M-D Public Works Belen Conveyance 3,070,344.00 SWU M-D Public Works 12800 block of SW 87 Ave 10,446.00 QNIP/SWU 795 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-92 Local Mitigation Strategy Project Status Reported 01/2016-12/31/2016 M-D Public Works SW 94 Terrace from SW 122 Avenue to End of cul-de-sac 60,800.00 SWU Completed Projects Cost Funding Source M-D Public Works Dadeland Park Subdivision Drainage Improvement Project - SW 81 Street to SW 83 Street from SW 79 Avenue to SW 87 Avenue (Includes SW 89 Avenue from SW 85 Street to SW 88 Street (Snapper Creek Park) 600,000.00 SWU St. Thomas University Replacement of wood electric power pole 5,000.00 Self funded Sweetwater South Florida Water Management District Flood Protection Berm 1,000,000.00 SFWMD Virginia Gardens VG - 66 avenue storm drain, ADA, and road widening project 650,000.00 State of FL Vizcaya Museum and Gardens Emergency Structural Repairs 4,500,000.00 Bond Completed Total # of Projects: 223 $ 117,848,514.33 Under Construction Cost Funding Source Aventura NE 191st ST Improvements 711,962.00 City/grant Aventura NE 29 PL Phase II South 721,000.00 City Aventura NE 213th ST Sea Wall Restoration 1,387,000.00 City/Grant Bal Harbour IT Enhancements 170,800.00 CIP Bay Harbor Rehabilitation of the Broad Causeway Bridges 13,000,000.00 * Coral Gables Fire Station #3 Hurricane shutters 88,000.00 Capital Improvement Coral Gables Basin Inflow and Infiltration Upgrade 1,179,793.00 FDEP Grant Storm Sewer Cutler Bay Drainage Improvements - Manta Drive 488,600.00 Stormwater Utility Cutler Bay Reduction of Floating Debris 60,000.00 City budget Cutler Bay Canal Cleaning and Shaping Town wide 750,000.00 City Budget Cutler Bay Flood Zone Data GIS System 140,000.00 Stormwater Utility Cutler Bay Town Hall/EOC HVAC System 610,000.00 * Cutler Bay Town Hall/EOC Hardening Project (Mechanical HVAC System) 228,000.00 * Cutler Bay Portable Traffic Control Signs 200,000.00 * Cutler Bay Emergency Portable Air Conditioner Units 120,000.00 * Cutler Bay Municipal AM Emergency Radio Broadcast Station 85,000.00 * Cutler Bay Removal of Australian Pines and other Exotics 100,000.00 City Budget Cutler Bay Drainage Improvements - Manta Drive 488,600.00 Stormwater Utility Doral Stormwater Improvements 5-Year CIP: Year 3 1,265,749.00 Stormwater 796 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-93 Local Mitigation Strategy Project Status Reported 01/2016-12/31/2016 Fee – Secured Under Construction Cost Funding Source Doral Stormwater Improvements 5-Year CIP: Year 2 1,017,150.00 FDOT Grant Doral Stormwater Improvements 5-Year CIP: Year 1 1,800,000.00 FDEP Grant Doral Stormwater Improvements 5-Year CIP: Year 3 1265749.00 Stormwater Fee El Portal Village of El Portal Stormwater Improvements 10,000,000.00 Hialeah Roadway/Stormwater Improvements (SE 4 ST to HIA DR from 6-8 AVE) 151,469.00 City Capital Improvement Funds Hialeah Gardens Central District Drainage Improvements 2,500,000.00 Homestead Sewer lines in the Northwest Neighborhood and the West Industrial Area 3,300,000.00 CIP Homestead Police Station Security/Hardening 50,000.00 Bond Issue Homestead Upgrade OCB's (Oil Circuit Breakers) with VCB's (Vacuum Circuit Breakers) 150000.00 CIP Homestead Improvements to Existing Buildings 500,000.00 CIP Homestead Sidewalks/ Roadway Improvements 200,000.00 CIP Homestead Improve Transportation Infrastructure 2,000,000.00 State/County Roads Homestead Wastewater Infiltration/Inflow 2,400,000.00 CIP Key Biscayne Flap Gates at Outfalls (Backflow Prevention) 750,000.00 Stormwater Utility/ Capital Expenditures Medley Flood Mitigation Area South 2,300,000.00 State, County & Town Medley Medley Public Services Facilities Strengthening 800,000.00 Town Budget Medley Drainage Improvements Phase III 270,000.00 Town Budget Medley Drainage Improvements Phase I 150,000.00 Town Budget Medley Drainage Improvements Phase II 450,000.00 Town Budget Medley Tobie Wilson Park Flood Proofing & Strengthening 800,000.00 Town Budget Medley Town Hall Building Strengthening 800,000.00 Town Budget Miami Acquire Portable Pumps and Generators 70,000.00 PDM Miami Beach Citywide Water Infrastructure Improvements 55,000,000.00 Unknown Miami Beach Citywide Dune Restoration & Enhancement Project 400,000.00 * Miami Beach Citywide Wastewater Infrastructure Improvements 2,250,000.00 * Miami Beach Drainage Hot Spots ** * Miami Beach Flood Proofing Sewer and Pump Stations 2,340,000.00 * Miami Beach Central Bayshore – Neighborhood Improvements (34th Street South) ** * Miami Beach Palm & Hibiscus Islands – Neighborhood ** * 797 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-94 Local Mitigation Strategy Project Status Reported 01/2016-12/31/2016 Improvements Under Construction Cost Funding Source Miami Beach Venetian Islands – Neighborhood Improvements (Phase 2) ** * Miami Beach Sunset Islands 3 & 4 – Neighborhood Improvements ** * Miami Beach West Avenue Neighborhood Drainage Improvements 15,900,000.00 * Miami Beach Sunset Harbor Pump Station Upgrades / Drainage Improvements 800,000.00 * Miami Beach Purchase of a Safeboat for Miami Beach Police Dept. Marine Patrol ** * Miami Beach Storage Tank Refurbishment Project ** * Miami Gardens Create GIS Layer for Storm Sewer Infrastructure 100,000.00 Unsecured Miami Springs Engineering Study to determine sites of canal bank restoration 2,000,000.00 DEP of Water Prot. Assis Miami Springs Removal of Australian Pines 14,000.00 City Budget Mount Sinai Mitigate the Impact of Storm Surge 3,000,000.00 DEP Mount Sinai Protect the Energy Center Facility Chillers 2,000,000.00 Self funded Mount Sinai Code Plus Construction Enhancements Surgical Tower 6,500,000.00 FEMA North Miami Sanitary Sewer Backup 700,000.00 * North Miami Surge Resistance and Flood Mitigation at Keystone Point and Sans Souci 500,000.00 * North Miami Flood Prevention and Mitigation: Drainage Basin13 500,000.00 * North Miami Beach Install Additional Storm Water Basins or Increase Existing Basins 60,000.00 CIP North Miami Beach NE 172nd Street Drainage Improvement 1,791,692.00 CIP North Miami Beach Clean and Improve Drainage Systems 428,400.00 CIP North Miami Beach Eastern Shores Drainage Repair/Replacement 450,000.00 CIP North Miami Beach Construct Storm Water System that may include Injection Wells in Areas Prone to Flooding 120,000.00 CIP North Miami Beach Miami Industrial District Drainage and Roadway Improvement 800,000.00 CIP North Miami Beach Renovation of Eastern Shores Outfall Pipes 550,000.00 CIP North Miami Beach NE 172nd Drainage Improvement 17,916.92 CIP North Miami Beach Clean and Improve the Drainage System 428,000.00 CIP Palmetto Bay Drainage Improvements for Sub-Basin # 10 1,000,000.00 SFWMD Grant Stormwater Utility Palmetto Bay Flood Zone Data Maintenance: GIS System 100,000.00 General Funds Palmetto Bay Drainage Improvements - SW 87 AVE (from SW 168 ST to SW 184 ST) 1,500,000.00 MD County Stormwater 798 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-95 Local Mitigation Strategy Project Status Reported 01/2016-12/31/2016 Utility Under Construction Cost Funding Source Palmetto Bay Downtown Redevelopment 12,440,000.00 County GOB Street Sign Bond General Funds Public Housing & Comm Dev Ward Tower 1,920,400.00 * Public Housing & Comm Dev Haley Sofge Towers 2,056,321.00 * Public Housing & Comm Dev Haley Sofge Towers 1,000,000.00 * Public Schools SW 82 ST from SW 73 Ave to SW 76 Ave 304,884.00 SWU Public Schools SW 165 Ave and SW 88 St 66,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works SW 220 St bet SW 103 CT & SW 102 Ave (10298 SW 229 ST 80,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works SW 207 Terrace from SW 124 Court to SW 126 Avenue Drainage Improvement Project 275,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works PWD Project No. 20130240 SW 2 Street to SW 4Street from SW 82 Avenue and SW 87 Avenue 295,825.00 SWU M-D Public Works SW 2 Street to SW 4 Street from SW 82 Avenue to SW 87 Avenue Drainage Improvement Project PWD Project No.20130240 144,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works SW 176 Street from US-1 to SW 107 Avenue 4,434,642.00 PTP M-D Public Works SW 157 Avenue from SW 88 Street to SW 91 Street 213,519.00 SWU M-D Public Works SW 157 Avenue from SW 184 Street to SW 152 Street 7,128,130.00 PTP M-D Public Works SW 152 Street and SW 82 Avenue Drainage Improvement Project 220,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works SW 132 Avenue from SW 117 Terrace to SW 120 Street 392645.00 PTP M-D Public Works SW 104 Street from SW 157 Avenue to SW 142 Avenue 505,335.00 SWU M-D Public Works Seaboard Acres Pump Station Retrofit 3,317,350.00 SWU/GOB M-D Public Works PWD Project No. 20120157 WO#1) (GOB 295,279.00 GOB M-D Public Works PWD Project No. 20040389 (PTP) (JPA with City of Miami) 5,663,390.00 (PTP) (JPA with City of Miami) M-D Public Works PWD Project No. 20040386 (PTP) (JPA with City of Miami) 4,702,799.00 PTP) (JPA with City of Miami) M-D Public Works Project No. 20120047 Town of Miami Lakes 93,321.00 Unknown M-D Public Works Old Cutler Road Bike Path (Phase II) 1,131,821.00 PTP M-D Public Works NW 87 Avenue from NW 154 Street to NW 186 Street 490,256.00 PTP M-D Public Works NW 74 Street from NW 87 Avenue to Palmetto Expressway 5,802,503.00 PTP 799 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-96 Local Mitigation Strategy Project Status Reported 01/2016-12/31/2016 M-D Public Works NW 58 Street from NW 92 Avenue to NW 102 Avenue - Drainage Improvement Project 1,075,000.00 GOB 77465 Under Construction Cost Funding Source M-D Public Works NW 37 Avenue from North River Drive to NW 79 Street 14,855,900.00 PTP M-D Public Works NW 178 Street from NW 89 Avenue to NW 90 Court 72190.00 SWU M-D Public Works NE 18 Avenue from NE 191 Street to NE 199 Street (NE 18 Avenue & NE 199 Street) 280,241.00 SWU M-D Public Works NE 167 Street & NE 14 Avenue 50,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works NE 12 Ave & NE 169 Terrace 128,302.00 SWU M-D Public Works Miller Drive & SW 133 PL 223,000.00 GOB M-D Public Works Midway Addition (Phases V, VI & VII) Drainage Improvement Project 867,050.00 GOB M-D Public Works Miami River Greenways 510,359.00 GOB M-D Public Works Miami River Greenways 1,193,721.00 GOB M-D Public Works Larchmont Pump Station Retrofit 4,665,069.00 SWU GOB M-D Public Works Larchmont Pump Retrofit Station Phases 1 & 2 3,300,000.00 SWU/GOB M-D Public Works Drainage Improvement PWD Project No. 20130156) 632,910.00 GOB/SWU M-D Public Works Drainage Improvement PWD Project No. 20120161) 189,372.00 QNIP M-D Public Works Arch Creek Phase IV- Pump Stations Improvements 120,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works Drainage Improvement Project - SW 99 Ave & SW 101 St; SW 129 AVE & SW 116 ST 0 Unknown South Miami SW 64 Avenue Drainage Improvement Project 115,230.00 Storm water People's Transportation Plan South Miami Citywide Drainage Improvements, Phase 6 275,000.00 Vizcaya Museum and Gardens Vizcaya Village Roof Replacement & Roof Structure Reinforcement 2,500,000.00 General Obligation Bond West Miami Impact Resistant Windows for City Hall 52,000.00 General Fund Under Construction Total # of Projects: 122 $ 239,143,336.97 Funded Not Yet Started Cost Funding Source Bal Harbour Jetty Pedestrian walking surface repairs 332,000.00 Capital Proj. Reserve Fund Bal Harbour Sewall and Dock Repair BHV park 55,000.00 Capital Projects Reserved Funding Cutler Bay Debris Removal 400,000.00 Grants 800 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-97 Local Mitigation Strategy Project Status Reported 01/2016-12/31/2016 Funded Not Yet Started Cost Funding Source Cutler Bay Preventive Pruning of Existing Town Tree Inventory 285,000.00 Town Budget Cutler Bay Storm Water Outfalls 500,000.00 Stormwater Utility Fund, Doral NW 41 St. from NW 79 Ave. to NW 87 Ave. Roadway Improvements 1,850,000.00 General Fund. Private Dev. /Impact Fee Credit Doral Stormwater Improvements 5-Year CIP: Year 4 1,047,694.00 City's Stormwater Emergency Management Barbara Goleman Senior Survey ** State Retrofit Funding FlCity Repair of Sewer Lines in Friedland Manor 475,000.00 CDBG, Legislative Appropriation, City funds Hialeah Roadway Reconstruction (W 8-10 Ave from W 31-33 Street) 2,190,724.00 CDBG Homestead New Sewer Mains: To upgrade sewer main/lines to eliminate raw sewage from leaking into the water table. 2,000,000.00 CIP Jackson Volt Oil Switch Replacements 7,350,000.00 GOB & Jackson's Bond Referendum Jackson Emergency Switchgear Replacements at JNMC 6,950,000.00 GOB & Jackson's Bond Referendum Jackson Utility/Energy Center at JMH 5,290,000.00 GOB 2005 & Jackson's Bond Referendum Key Biscayne Reverse 911 Community Notification System 105,000.00 Capital Improvement Fund Key Biscayne Purchase of Emergency Vehicles 75,000.00 Capital Improvement Fund Key Biscayne New Stormwater Outfall Construction 210,000.00 Private funding. Key Biscayne Coastal Dune Vegetation 10,000.00 Capital Improvement Fund Key Biscayne Additional Training 2,500.00 Fire Training Budget Miami Station/Facility Apparatus Room Doors 252,000.00 PDM Miami Mitigation & Resiliency Initiative for Historic 139,500.00 Grants 801 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-98 Local Mitigation Strategy Project Status Reported 01/2016-12/31/2016 Neighborhoods in the City of Miami Miami Watson Island Baywalk 300,000.00 PDM Funded Not Yet Started Cost Funding Source Miami Study to Reduce Erosion on Virginia Key Beach 75,000.00 PDM Miami Restoration of Native Species 75,000.00 PDM Miami Property Maintenance Division Upgrades 160,000.00 PDM Miami Hurricane Window Barriers for Park Recreation Buildings 250,000.00 PDM Miami Fire Station Hardening 144,000.00 PDM Miami Protect Vital City Records 60,000.00 FMA Miami Communications Systems Generator 60,000.00 PDM Miami Beach Indian Creek Drive 25th to 41st Street Drainage Improvements 2,700,000.00 FDOT and Miami Beach Miami Beach Cultural and Historical Resources Hazard Mitigation Plan ** FEMA and City of Miami Beach Miami Gardens Vista Verde Drainage and Roadway Improvement Project 3,800,000.00 Stormwater, CDBG, CITT, FL Legislative Appropriations Grants Miami Gardens Culvert and Headwall Project 400,000.00 Potential Miami Gardens NW 13 Avenue/Industrial Area Drainage Outfall Project 230,000.00 Stormwater Funding Miami Gardens NW 11 Avenue Stormwater Drainage Project 100,000.00 Stormwater Funds Mount Sinai Code Plus Construction Energy Center Facility Protect Redundant Power Supply 250,000.00 * North Miami Beach Leak Detection Services 50,000.00 CIP North Miami Beach Drainage in Alleyways 50,000.00 CIP North Miami Beach Storm Water Pump Replacement Program 50,000.00 CIP North Miami Beach Pump Replacements 165,000.00 CIP North Miami Beach Force Main Installations and Lift Stations Rehabilitations 125,000.00 CIP North Miami Beach Aerial Pipe Crossings 350,000.00 CIP North Miami Beach Inflow and Infiltration Prevention 250,000.00 CIP North Miami Beach Fire Flow Improvements 320,000.00 CIP North Miami Beach Trenchless Pipe Replacements 325,000.00 CIP North Miami Beach Roadway Improvements 327,000.00 CIP North Miami Beach Storm Water Improvement City-Wide 336,885.00 CIP North Miami Beach Dead End Eliminations 42,000.00 CIP Palmetto Bay Localized Drainage Improvements Phase VI 403,733.00 Stormwater 802 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-99 Local Mitigation Strategy Project Status Reported 01/2016-12/31/2016 Utility/Grants Funded Not Yet Started Cost Funding Source Palmetto Bay Sub-Basin 59/60 1,100,000.00 SFWMD and Stormwater Utility Revenue Palmetto Bay Public Information and Educational Campaign 16,500.00 Stormwater Utility Funding Palmetto Bay Repetitive Loss Retrofit 313,570.00 Stormwater Utility Revenue M-D Public Works SW 92 AVE FROM SW 8 TER TO SW 12 ST ROADWAY DRAINAGE 616537.22 SWU FUNDING CAPITAL PROJECT M-D Public Works NW 76 ST FROM NW 36 AVE TO NW 37 AVE 425,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works Seaboard Acres Pump Station 1,500,000.00 * M-D Public Works Larchmont Gardens Pump Station 1,671,841.00 * M-D Public Works NE 6 AVE& NE 185 Street; NE Miami CT, from NE 196-198 ST; NW 22 AVE & NW 175 ST; North DR & NE 14 AVE 835,000.00 * M-D Public Works Belen Phase III B 1,590,000.00 SWU M-D Public Works SW 157 AVE Canal Interconnect ** * Virginia Gardens VG - NW 40 street Stormwater Improvement Project 697,000.00 FDOT Funded - Not Yet Started # of Projects: 60 $ 49,683,484.22 Total Projects 405 $ 406,675,335.50 * Funding source not provided ** Project estimates were not available at time document went to print. 803 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-100 2017 Projects Reported as Completed Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Projects Reported from 01/2017 to 12/2017 Completed Projects Funding Costs Coral Gables Basin Inflow and Infiltration Upgrade FDEP Grant Storm Sewer 1,179,793.00 Cutler Bay Purchase Communications Emergency Equipment budgeted 65,000.00 Cutler Bay Development of Floodplain Management Plan Mitigation grant 120,000.00 Cutler Bay Acquisition of Emergency Generators budgeted 394,000.00 Cutler Bay Town Hall/EOC Installation of Transfer Switch for Emergency Power budgeted 394,000.00 Cutler Bay Portable Traffic Light Signals * 140,000.00 Cutler Bay Purchase Computerized Equipment Storage for Vital Public Records budgeted 75,000.00 Cutler Bay Satellite Phones Budgeted 55,000.00 Cutler Bay SW 97th Ave Drainage Improvement Lennar Homes 291,494.00 Cutler Bay Old Cutler Road JPA Miami Dade County, CITT, PTP 7,524,319.00 Cutler Bay SW 216th Street and SW 97th Ave Traffic Circle budgeted 204,486.00 Doral Stormwater Improvements 5-Year CIP: Year 3 Stormwater Fee - Secured 1,265,749.00 Florida City Repair of Sewer Lines in Friedland Manor CDBG, Legislative Approp., City funds 475,000.00 Homestead New Sewer Mains CIP 2,000,000.00 Key Biscayne Purchase of Emergency Vehicles CIP 60,000.00 Miami NW 2nd Avenue (11th to I-395) * 2,000,000.00 Miami SW 3rd Avenue Road Improvement Project * 1,450,000.00 Miami Miami River Greenway (NW 10th Ave to NW 12th Ave) * 3,000,000.00 Miami Englewood Storm Sewers Project -Phase III * 5,400,000.00 Miami Grove Park Storm Sewers Project * 6,000,000.00 Miami NW 14th Street Streetscape Project * 3,000,000.00 Miami NE/NW 14th Street from NE 2ndAvenue to FEC Track; North Miami Avenue from NE/NW 15th Street to I- 395 Right-of-way Line. * 4,000,000.00 Miami Miami River Greenway SE 5th Street Extension * 2,200,000.00 North Miami Flood Prevention and Mitig.: Drainage Basin13 * 600,000.00 North Miami Security for City Hall * 62,750.00 Palmetto Bay Drainage Improvements for Sub-Basin # 10 SFWMD GrantVPB - Stormwater Utility 1,000,000.00 Public Housing and Comm. Dev. Stirrup Plaza Federal funds 450,000.00 Projects reported as completed 27 $51,259,591.00 *Data not available at time of report 804 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-101 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Projects Reported from 01/2017 to 12/2017 Projects Under Construction Funding Costs Aventura NE 29 PL Phase II South City funded project. 721,000.00 Coral Gables Pump Station Cocoplum 1 Emergency Generator Sanitary Sewer Fund 100,884.00 Cutler Bay Town Hall/EOC HVAC System * 610,000.00 Cutler Bay Town Hall/EOC Hardening Project (Mechanical HVAC System) * 228,000.00 Cutler Bay Reduction of Floating Debris budgeted, ongoing 60,000.00 Cutler Bay Portable Traffic Control Signs * 200,000.00 Cutler Bay Flood Zone Data GIS System Stormwater Utility fund 140,000.00 Cutler Bay Drainage Improvements - Manta Drive Stormwater Utility Funds; applied for FDOT Tap Grant. 488,600.00 Cutler Bay Removal of Australian Pines and other Exotics included in F.Y. 2016- 2017 Budget 100,000.00 Cutler Bay Municipal AM Emergency Radio Broadcast Station * 85,000.00 Cutler Bay Emergency Portable Air Conditioner Units * 120,000.00 Cutler Bay Canal Cleaning and Shaping Town wide budgeted annually, ongoing 750,000.00 Doral Stormwater Improvements 5-Year CIP: Year 4 Funded by City's Stormwater Fee 1,047,694.00 FlCity Sealing the Palm Drive Canal Developer Extractions, City Funds, County Funds 7,000,000.00 Homestead Wastewater Infiltration/Inflow Capital Improvement Fund 2,400,000.00 Homestead Improve Transportation Infrastructure Miami-Dade and State of Florida 2,000,000.00 Homestead Upgrade OCB's (Oil Circuit Breakers) with VCB's (Vacuum Circuit Breakers) Capital Improvement Plan 150,000.00 Homestead Sidewalks/ Roadway Improvements Capital Improvement Plan 200,000.00 Homestead Improvements to Existing Buildings Capital Improvement Plan 500,000.00 Homestead Police Station Security/Hardening Bond Issue 50,000.00 Homestead Sewer lines in the Northwest Neighborhood and the West Industrial Area Capital Improvement Funds 3,300,000.00 Homestead Interchange Modification Funded by Toll and Concessions Revenue 15,000,000.00 Homestead Improve Transportation Infrastructure Miami-Dade and State of Florida 2,000,000.00 Homestead Upgrade OCB's (Oil Circuit Breakers) with VCB's (Vacuum Circuit Breakers) Capital Improvement Plan 150,000.00 Homestead Sidewalks/ Roadway Improvements Capital Improvement Plan 200,000.00 805 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-102 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Projects Reported from 01/2017 to 12/2017 Projects reported as Under Construction Funding Costs Key Biscayne Phase II Village K-8 Center Stormwater Pump Station Stormwater Utility Fund 350,000.00 Key Biscayne Comprehensive Review of Local Laws and Regulations Stormwater Utility Fund 5,000.00 Key Biscayne Flap Gates at Outfalls (Backflow Prevention) Stormwater Utility Capital Expen. 750,000.00 Miami Acquire Portable Pumps and Generators PDM 70,000.00 Miami Bird Avenue Road Improvement PDM 1,728,000.00 Miami Beach Venetian Islands – Neighborhood Improvements (Phase 2) * * Miami Beach Extensive Repairs to Seawalls & Creation of Living Shoreline City funds/Grant 3,787,000.00 Miami Beach Citywide Water Infrastructure Improvements * 55,000,000.00 Miami Dade College Entrepreneurial Educational Cntr, bldg 1000 HMGP Grant 148,720.00 Miami Gardens Create GIS Layer for Storm Sewer Infrastructure * 100,000.00 Mount Sinai Protect the Energy Center Facility Chillers Self funded 2,000,000.00 North Bay Village GIS Conversion of Sanitary Sewer System Utility Fund 28,200.00 North Bay Village Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation State Revolving Loan Fund 3,900,000.00 North Bay Village Water Main Rehabilitation State Revolving Loan Fund 4,400,000.00 North Bay Village Water Meter and Service Line Replacement State Revolving Loan Fund 4,700,000.00 North Miami Gravity Sewer Systems Improvements for Groundwater Infiltration Reduction * 7,000,000.00 North Miami Surge Resistance and Flood Mitigation at Keystone Point and Sans Souci * 600,000.00 North Miami Beach Clean and Improve Drainage Systems CIP 428,400.00 North Miami Beach Eastern Shores Drainage Repair/Replacement CIP 450,000.00 North Miami Beach NE 172nd Street Drainage Improvement CIP 1,791,692.00 Palmetto Bay Downtown Redevelopment County GOB Street Sign Bond General Funds 12,440,000.00 Palmetto Bay Drainage Improvements - SW 87 AVE (from SW 168 ST to SW 184 ST) Stormwater Utility Revenue 1,500,000.00 Palmetto Bay Flood Zone Data Maintenance: GIS System General Funds 100,000.00 Public Works and Waste Management Midway Addition (Phases V, VI & VII) Drainage Improvement Project - Flagler Street to NW 7 Street from NW 87 Avenue to NW 79 Avenue PWD Project No. 20130249) (GOB 77452 Midway Addition Phases V VI VII GOB 867,050.00 806 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-103 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Projects Reported from 01/2017 to 12/2017 Projects reported as Under Construction Funding Costs Seaport Cruise Berth 6 Stormwater Improv * 750,000.00 South Miami SW 64 Avenue Drainage Improvement Project Storm water Drain Trust Fund, People's Transportation Plan 115,230.00 Projects reported as Under Construction 48 $ 138,260,470.00 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Projects Reported from 01/2017 to 11/30/2017 Projects Funded Not Yet Started Funding Costs Coral Gables Install Solar Panels at Youth Center Unknown 472,000.00 Cutler Bay Preventive Pruning of Existing Town Tree Inventory F.Y. 2016 - 2017 285,000.00 Cutler Bay Debris Removal Will apply for Grants as necessary 400,000.00 Cutler Bay Storm Water Outfalls Stormwater Utility Fund 500,000.00 Doral NW 41 St. from NW 79 Ave. to NW 87 Ave. Roadway Improvements General Fund. Private Developer/ Impact Fee Credit 1,850,000.00 Doral Stormwater Improvements 5-Year CIP: Year 5 Stormwater fees. 1,398,536.00 Homestead New Sewer Mains: To upgrade sewer main/lines to eliminate raw sewage from leaking into the water table. Capital Improvement Fund 2,000,000.00 Key Biscayne New Stormwater Outfall Construction Private funding. 210,000.00 Key Biscayne Reverse 911 Community Notification System Capital Improvement Fund 105,000.00 Key Biscayne Community Center Generator Capital Improvement Fund 75,000.00 Key Biscayne Additional Training Fire Department Training Budget 2,500.00 Miami Hurricane Window Barriers for Park Recreation Buildings PDM 250,000.00 Miami Protect Vital City Records FMA 60,000.00 Miami Study to Reduce Erosion on Virginia Key Beach PDM 75,000.00 Miami Property Maintenance Division Upgrades PDM 160,000.00 Miami Fire Station Hardening PDM 144,000.00 Miami Station/Facility Apparatus Room Doors PDM 252,000.00 Miami Watson Island Baywalk PDM 300,000.00 Miami Restoration of Native Species PDM 75,000.00 Miami Communications Systems Generator PDM 60,000.00 Miami Mitigation & Resiliency Initiative for Historic Neighborhoods in the City of Miami City Funds 139,500.00 Miami Beach Cultural and Historical Resources Hazard Mitigation Plan FEMA and City 0.00 807 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-104 Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Projects Reported from 01/2017 to 11/30/2017 Projects Funded Not Yet Started Funding Costs Miami Gardens Vista Verde Drainage and Roadway Improvement Project Stormwater, CDBG, CITT/ State Legislative Appropriations Grants 3,800,000.00 Miami Lakes Lake Sarah Drainage Improvements DEP and SFWMD 2,200,000.00 North Bay Village Baywalk Plaza - Drainage Well Park Improvement Fund (Secured) FIND Grant (Secured) 200,000.00 North Bay Village Stormwater Outfall Rehabilitation Stormwater Fund State Revolving Fund Loan Program 1,200,000.00 North Bay Village Deep Well Injection System Rehabilitation Stormwater Fund Department of Envir Protection Grant 633,737.00 North Bay Village Roadway Resurfacing Citizen Independent Transportation Trust Local Capital Improve. Gas Tax 1,500,000.00 North Miami Beach Leak Detection Services CIP 50,000.00 North Miami Beach Transmission Main Pipe Evaluation and Testing CIP 25,000.00 Palmetto Bay Repetitive Loss Retrofit Stormwater Utility Revenue 313,570.00 Palmetto Bay Localized Drainage Improvements Phase VI Stormwater Utility Revenue 403,733.00 Palmetto Bay Public Information and Educational Campaign Stormwater Utility Funding 16,500.00 Palmetto Bay Sub-Basin 59/60 SFWMD/Stormwater Utility Revenue 1,100,000.00 Public Housing and Comm. Dev. Liberty Square CAPITAL FUND 2,916,000.00 Public Housing and Comm. Dev. Liberty Square CAPITAL FUND 3,240,000.00 Public Housing and Comm. Dev. Liberty Square CAPITAL FUND 3,000,000.00 Virginia Gardens VG - NW 40 street Stormwater Improvement Project FDOT 697,000.00 Projects reported as Funded but not yet started 38 $ 30,109,076.00 808 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-105 Partners make it happen! 809 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 6 – Completed Projects January 2018 P6-106 We’re still at it so there’s more to come! The Local Mitigation Strategy Contact: LMS Coordinator (305) 468-5429 mdlms@miamidade.gov 810 Local Mitigation Strategy Whole Community Whole Community Hazard Mitigation Part 7: Flooding - The NFIP and CRS January 2018 811 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-i This page left intentionally blank 812 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-ii INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 Scope .......................................................................................................................... 2 Planning Process ....................................................................................................... 2 Assessing the Hazard ................................................................................................ 2 Rainy Season ............................................................................................................. 4 Background and History ........................................................................................... 5 Flood Events .............................................................................................................. 7 Flood Impacts ........................................................................................................... 11 Flood Regulations in Miami-Dade County ............................................................. 12 Storm Surge ............................................................................................................. 18 Sea Level Rise .......................................................................................................... 24 Mapping Integration .................................................................................................... 26 Primary Drainage Basins......................................................................................... 26 Repetitive Loss Properties ...................................................................................... 29 Impact Assessment ................................................................................................. 33 Determination of a Significant Rain Event ............................................................. 33 Tracking Local Rainfall Amounts ........................................................................... 35 Impact Assessment System .................................................................................... 37 Higher Regulatory Standards ................................................................................. 37 NFIP Communities ................................................................................................... 52 Community Rating System (CRS) Communities ................................................... 57 Public Information Activities ...................................................................................... 58 Emergency Planning Information ........................................................................... 59 Social Media ............................................................................................................. 60 Outreach Activities .................................................................................................. 61 Property Sale Disclosure......................................................................................... 64 Flood Protection Information .................................................................................. 64 Storm Ready Community ........................................................................................ 67 813 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-iii Weather-Ready Nation ............................................................................................. 67 Alert and Notification ............................................................................................... 67 Community Information and Reporting ................................................................. 71 Map 1: Canals in Miami-Dade County ............................................................................. 6 Map 2: Residential Construction by Flood Regulation Milestones ................................. 13 Map 3: FEMA Flood Zones Miami-Dade County 2009 ................................................. 15 Map 4: Buildings By FEMA Flood Zones ...................................................................... 16 Map 5: Maximum of Maximums (MOM) Storm Surge for Category 5 ............................ 18 Map 6: Storm Surge Planning Zones ............................................................................ 19 Map 7: Buildings within Storm Surge Planning Zones ................................................... 21 Map 8: Potential Sea Level Rise Impacts Miami-Dade................................................. 25 Map 9: Drainage Basins with Canals Identified ............................................................. 27 Map 10: Municipal Boundaries in Relation to Drainage Basins ..................................... 28 Map 11: Repetitive Loss Areas, General Map ............................................................... 29 Map 12: Un-Mitigated Repetitive Loss Properties Address Count ................................. 30 Map 13: Repetitive Loss Claims by Value by Flood Basin ............................................ 32 Map 14: Acquisition Projects - Environmentally Endangered Lands Program .............. 49 Map 15: Miami-Dade County Library Locations ............................................................ 66 Figure 1: Impact Assessments: Before, During and After an Event .............................. 33 Table 1: Top 10 Rainfall Sites in South Florida in 2017 Rainy Season .......................... 4 Table 2: Major Flood Regulation Dates for Miami-Dade County (Nov. 2014) ................ 12 Table 3: Jurisdictional Residential Structures by Flood Milestones ............................... 14 Table 4: Buildings by Jurisdiction in Flood Zones (Nov. 2014) ...................................... 17 Table 5: Population Estimates and Evacuation Clearance Times for Storm Surge Planning Zones ...................................................................................................... 20 Table 6: Commercial and Industrial Facilities by Municipality in Storm Surge Planning Zones ..................................................................................................................... 22 Table 7: Residential and Other Structures by Municipality within Storm Surge Zones . 23 Table 8: Repetitive Losses by Jurisdiction* ................................................................... 31 Table 9: Community Rating System Members* ............................................................ 57 814 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-1 INTRODUCTION In 2013, a number of events occurred that led to the decision to expand Part 7 of the LMS to help capture and compile information in support of the Community Rating System (CRS) communities and more thoroughly address our current and future flood risks and mitigation measures. Key events included: • The rollout of new Storm Surge Planning Zones based upon updated Sea Lake Overland Surge from Hurricanes (SLOSH) data • The 2013 update to the CRS Coordinators Manual • The desire to integrate climate change and sea level rise considerations into the LMS • The Biggert-Waters Act and reforms to the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) • The desire to integrate the planning consideration of the Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP) and Stormwater Management Master Plan into the LMS, since the LMS is the Floodplain Management Plan for the County Actions taken to further incorporate flooding considerations into the LMS and community mitigation included: • Designation of the local CRS User Group as a Sub-Committee of the LMS • Nichole Hefty, the Chief of the Miami-Dade Office of Sustainability was nominated to become a member of the LMS Steering Committee • The Office of Emergency Management (OEM) hosted the L-278 class CRS training to assist our local communities in preparing for the changes • Additional maps were developed to determine flood risk • OEM and Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department (WASD) partnered to work on an educational component to introduce stakeholders to a new interactive model to help determine potential impacts from Sea Level Rise • Identification of activities that Miami-Dade County Departments conduct that may assist all of our communities with uniform credit • Collaboration with the newly appointed State CRS Coordinator • Integration of Sea Level Rise considerations into the Miami-Dade Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) 815 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-2 Scope Part 7, as with other portions of the LMS, will identify what CRS activities the sections align with, as applicable. The CRS/Flood Sub-Committee will be responsible for supporting the development and review of this section of the LMS. This section is meant to be supplementary to and not replace the responsibilities of the community CRS Coordinator. Planning Process As identified in Part 1, the LMS is a reflection of the initiatives that are identified and supported by the LMS Chair, LMS Co-Chair, the LMS Steering Committee, the LMS Working Group (WG) and the LMS Sub-Committees(S-C). As illustrated in Part 4 Appendix B, there is a diverse representation of agencies from the whole community engaged in the LMS.1 The LMS Working Group meets on a quarterly basis and the Steering Committee and Sub-Committees meet on an as needed basis. All meetings are open to the public and are advertised on the LMS webpage: http://www.miamidade.gov/fire/mitigation.asp. Meeting Notes and Attendance Sheets are maintained in Part 5 – Meeting Notes. The LMS Chair develops and sends out a monthly LMS Information Bulletin to the LMSWG and posts this on the website.2 The LMS Information Bulletin provides information on updates and changes to the LMS program, training and outreach activities, information on new mitigation products, and information pertinent to the stakeholders. The LMS undergoes a five-year cycle for submittal to the State and FEMA for review and approval. Upon FEMA approval, the plan is adopted locally by the Board of County Commissioners (BCC). Miami-Dade has a metropolitan form of government, (as discussed in Part 1 with supporting documentation in Part 4 Appendix G). When the BCC passes a resolution or ordinance, that action automatically includes all the municipalities within the county. In the event a municipality does not wish to participate in the action, that municipality must, through their own resolution, opt out. For example, when the BCC adopted this LMS, the municipalities were automatically included and none opted out. The latest adoption documents are provided in Part 4 Appendix D.3 Local communities that wish to utilize the LMS as their floodplain management plan for credit under the CRS program will have to do a local adoption of the plan. Local communities are welcome to have their Annual Report (Activity 510) report included in Appendix B of this document. Assessing the Hazard South Florida is vulnerable to flooding from rainfall events and rainfall and storm surge from tropical cyclones. As illustrated and discussed in the THIRA, in Part 4 Appendix I, 1 CRS – 510(Step 1) (b) and 501( Step 2)(a) 2 CRS – 510 (Step 2) (a) 3 CRS - 510(Step 1) (c) 816 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-3 flooding, hurricanes and tropical storms have a moderately high risk to our communities. Miami-Dade has a relatively flat topography and is interlaced with extensive canal systems operated by South Florida Water Management District, PWWM and local municipalities. Miami-Dade is surrounded by water with the Atlantic Ocean, Intracoastal Waterway, Biscayne Bay, Florida Bay and the Florida Everglades. The County is close to sea level with an underground water supply just below the ground surface. The future threat of sea level rise and the potential impacts are being considered and additional modeling and mapping are being conducted to help us understand how communities may be impacted differently depending upon their geographic location and specific considerations. Some of our coastal communities are already experiencing “sunny day flooding” during king tides, typically occurring between September and November. The LMS will continue to incorporate and provide speakers and reference material to promote mitigation measures throughout our community. • Canal and groundwater elevations, when combined with seasonal rainfall variations and the volume of the potential storm, result in a definite flood hazard to inland areas. • All tropical weather systems have to be carefully monitored, several days before they make landfall. Because of the time needed to move water through canals to increase capacity, more advanced monitoring is needed. • Coastal flooding has potential to impact residential and commercial development along the east coast of South Florida and Biscayne Bay, primarily through storm surge and inundation. 817 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-4 Rainy Season South Florida’s rainy season typically lasts an average of 155 days starting in mid-May and ending in mid-October. According to the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), the 2017 rainy season was the second wettest on record since 1932. The South Florida top ten rainfall sites (Table 1), compiled by the NWS – Miami Office, includes four Miami-Dade County sites (in yellow). The Miami International Airport and Miami Beach sites, recorded their highest rainy season amounts with 62.25 inches of rainfall (21.86 inches above normal) and 47.78 inches (16.44 inches above normal), respectively. The Opa-Locka Airport site recorded the highest rainfall amount in Miami- Dade County with 66.78 inches of rainfall. Table 1: Top 10 Rainfall Sites in South Florida in 2017 Rainy Season Top 10 Rainfall Sites for 2017 Rainy Season June 1 – October 24 Departure from Normal 1. Naples/Golden Gate (NWS COOP) 79.89 +40.75 2. Opa-Locka Airport (NWS ASOS) 66.78 3. Marco Island (NWS COOP) 66.42 4. Miami International Airport (NWS ASOS) 62.25 +21.86 (#1) 5. Naples Municipal Airport (NWS ASOS) 61.06 +25.00 (#1) 6. The Redland (NWS COOP) 59.86 +17.61 (#3) 7. Oasis Ranger Station (NWS COOP) 56.96 +16.59 (#2) 8. Hollywood (NWS COOP) 56.08 +18.14 9. NWS Miami – FIU Main Campus (NWS COOP) 54.35 10. Pembroke Pines – North Perry Apt (NWS ASOS) 50.52 June was the wettest month of the season with rainfall amounts between 10 to 15 inches throughout South Florida. The rest of the season, rainfall amounts were near or slightly above average. September recorded high rainfall amounts, but these were mostly due to Major Hurricane Maria making landfall in South Florida on September 10th. The South Florida dry season typically lasts from October into May with an average rainfall of 12- 19 inches, lowest in the interior and western portions of south Florida. 818 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-5 Background and History During the early stages of development in Miami-Dade County, the land was frequently inundated for long periods due to the flat topography, low land elevations and the high groundwater table in the Biscayne aquifer. To remedy this situation, and to make the land suitable for habitation, various local governments and private entities initiated the construction of the canal system that exists today. This system was designed to move water to the east and ultimately to Biscayne Bay using gravity flow. The excavation of the canal system exposed the Biscayne aquifer, the county's primary source of drinking water, to saltwater intrusion. In order to stem the flow of salt water into the Biscayne aquifer, salinity control structures were constructed at the mouths of both primary and secondary canals throughout Miami-Dade County. The early design of the canal system did not consider the extensive development that has occurred in the western parts of the county. These western areas are lower in elevation, and thus more flood-prone. The system relies on gravity to discharge, and is inadequate to remove storm water volume caused by major rain events, particularly considering large tidal surge that may accompany tropical storm events. Today, the canal system in Miami-Dade County consists of over 616 miles laid out in approximate one to two-mile grids. The canal system is divided into 360 miles of primary canals, 260 miles of secondary canals, 350 miles of smaller ditches under private jurisdiction, and 75 miles of coastal waterways. The primary system, including most of the salinity control structures, is operated by the South Florida Water Management District. The secondary system is the responsibility of Miami-Dade County. In general, the secondary canal system connects into the primary system, which empties into Biscayne Bay. The private ditches discharge into the secondary and primary canals and the coastal ditches discharge directly into Biscayne Bay. The ability to move water in the secondary system is dependent on the available capacity of the primary system, which, in turn, is dependent in part on the proper operation of the salinity control structures. The canal systems are depicted in Map 1. The principal functions of the canal system are: • To maintain adequate groundwater levels in the Biscayne aquifer, to provide for both water supply and to prevent salt-water intrusion. In general, the water levels in the canal system are lower than the groundwater levels. The canal system can be used to recharge the Biscayne aquifer during the dry season when flow is conveyed from Lake Okeechobee and the water conservation areas into the urbanized areas. Conversely, during the wet season, groundwater flows from the aquifer into the canals and is discharged to the ocean, as needed, to prevent flooding. • To provide for drainage during periods of excess rainfall, when the control structures must be operated to prevent overtopping of canal banks. 819 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-6 Map 1: Canals in Miami-Dade County 820 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-7 Flood Events Two flood events of note in 1999 and 2000 changed the way water managers, emergency managers and residents approached disasters in south Florida. October 1999 – Hurricane Irene (DR-1306) developed and started a path towards South Florida. Initial projections were correct in stating the hurricane would impact the west coast of Florida, and Irene traveled through the state and, on October 15, passed just to the west of Miami-Dade County 4. Although the hurricane did not pass directly through the county and no exceptionally high winds were experienced, the heavy rainfall associated with this storm did hit Miami- Dade County, and the impacts were severe. Some roads were impassible for weeks, electricity was out in certain areas, and residents and businesses suffered heavy losses. As a result of Hurricane Irene, the Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners created a Flood Management Task Force, to analyze why certain areas were so heavily impacted by floodwaters. After eight months of meetings with affected residents and industry, the Task Force offered eighteen recommendations. These recommendations are being implemented where possible, and progress is being tracked. October 2000 – A tropical disturbance, later to become Tropical Storm Leslie, developed off the west coast of Cuba on October 2nd, and headed toward South Florida (DR-1345). Water managers and weather officials closely tracked the system, and preemptive measures were taken to start moving water out of the canals. Weather forecasts called for 4-8 inches of rainfall from this system, but once the disturbance moved toward the west coast of Florida, it interacted with a stalled frontal boundary located over south Florida. This resulted in 14 to 18 inches of rainfall over a linear area in the center of the county 5. Equally as unfortunate were residents and businesses that experienced a similar result as in Irene. Immediately after this so-called "no-name" storm hit, the county commission reconvened the Task Force, to re-examine the problem. 4 Tropical Cyclone Report: Hurricane Irene, October 13-19, 1999 (http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL131999_Irene.pdf) 5 Tropical Cylone Report: Tropical Storm Leslie (Subtropical Depression One), October 4-7, 2000 (http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL162000_Leslie.pdf) 821 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-8 August 2005 – Hurricane Katrina was every bit as much a flood event as it was a windstorm. Large areas in south Miami-Dade County were impacted by flooding, especially in the agricultural community. October 2011 – On October 9, 2011 we experienced a heavy rain event in Miami-Dade with over 10 inches of rain falling at the West Kendall/Tamiami Airport. The top graphic illustrates the rainfall amounts for a 48-hour period. From October 28-31, 2011 another heavy rain event occurred with the greatest impacts being felt in Miami Beach. The areas of heaviest showers and thunderstorms were over Pinecrest, Coral Gables and Coconut Grove and remained over that area for another few hours. This area of rainfall produced anywhere from 6 to 10 inches of rain in only a few hours from Cutler Bay to Coconut Grove, leading to severe street flooding and intrusion of water into dozens of homes across this area. Estimates from the South Florida Water Management District indicate that isolated areas in Coconut Grove may have received in excess of 12 inches during this time span. Portions of Miami- Dade County experienced 3-7 inches of rain in a few hours causing significant street flooding. The middle graphic illustrates the rainfall amounts. June 2013 – Tropical Storm Andrea passed across north Florida, while south Florida was on the receiving end of torrential rains over northeastern Dade as the tail of the storm moved across the area. Up to 14 inches of rain was recorded in North Miami Beach in only a few hours and 8-12 inches from North Miami to the southern portion of Broward County. The event caused severe street flooding and flooding of buildings. The graphic to the right illustrates the rainfall amounts for this event. 822 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-9 October 2013 – On October 3rd, significant flooding occurred in Kendall, the Falls and Pinecrest with measured rainfall of amounts up to 10 inches in 8 hours causing street flooding and damages to homes and several apartment buildings. February 2015 – In February 28th, a stalled frontal system produced rainfall amounts between 2-6 inches throughout the county in a 24-hour period. The most rain fell in El Portal and Miami Beach. No significant damage was reported from this event. No significant rain events were reported during South Florida’s rainy season as the season was significantly drier than normal. December 2015 – In December 5th and 6th, a series of fronts stalled over southern Florida resulting in significant rainfall throughout the county. Recorded rainfall amounts during the 24- hour period were similar from past tropical systems. The Miami Executive Airport recorded 9 inches of rain and West Kendall reported over 10 inches. The Homestead/Redland area recorded 6 to 8 inches of rain which lead to severe flooding in agricultural land resulting in a significant loss of crops. Other reports of this events included road closures and many stalled vehicles. December is typically the driest month in South Florida, but Miami International Airport recorded, its second wettest December on record, with 9.75 inches. Miami Executive Airport in West Kendall and Redland recorded 18.43 and 15 inches, respectively. January 2016 – In January 27th, 2016 an area of low pressure developed in the southeastern Gulf of Mexico. As a result, a weak warm front moved through South Florida and then stalled over Central Florida until the afternoon of the 28th. A stronger upper level system lifted the area of low pressure across Florida bringing a cold front through South Florida. 823 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-10 Rainfall of up to 3.18 inches fell throughout the County on January 27th with the highest amounts in northwest Miami-Dade. Heavier localized rainfall was recorded throughout the County. On the 28th, up to 4 inches of rainfall was recorded throughout the County. Heavier amounts in the north- northwestern portion of the County. The image on the right shows the rainfall amounts in the 24-hour period between January 27th and 28th. The 2016 Atlantic Hurricane Season had two “near- misses” for Miami-Dade County, but no significant flood damage was reported. August 2016 – At the beginning of its trajectory, Tropical Depression 9 appeared as a potential threat to Miami-Dade County with a possible landfall as a stronger tropical cyclone. As the system continued its west-northwest track, a hostile atmospheric environment hindered its development. The disturbance ultimately evaded the County and moved through the Straits of Florida. Thunderstorms stayed over the coastal waters. October 2016 – Hurricane Matthew became the biggest threat to South Florida since Hurricane Wilma in 2005. The center of Matthew remained offshore and no hurricane impacts were felt in the County. Matthew’s outside bands, as it continued its paralleled track along the east coast of Florida, produced some squally weather between October 5th and 7th producing up to 1.5 inches rainfall throughout the County. August 2017 – On August 1st, Tropical Storm Emily was located over the Atlantic and moving away from Florida. Although no direct impacts were reported for Miami-Dade County, a trough extending from the tropical system was over southeastern Florida. A combination of the frontal boundary and daytime heating, a band of thunderstorms developed off the coast and moved west. At around 2 pm, the band became nearly stationary over Miami Beach, Key Biscayne and Downtown Miami. A Flash Flood Warning was issued at 3:47pm until 9:45pm. Later in the afternoon, the same band of thunderstorms redeveloped over The Redland, Kendall, Palmetto Bay and Pinecrest area. Rainfall amounts in these areas ranged between 4 and 6 inches with isolated amounts between 7 and 8 inches. The rainfall rates of 2 to 4 inches an hour lasted 2 to 3 hours, and around the same time as high tide. Significant flooding was reported in Miami Beach and the Brickell area in the City of Miami. Vehicles were stalled in streets with up to 2 feet of water and some streets had to be closed due to deep standing water. In Miami Beach, 1 to 2 feet of water was reported on streets in South Beach including Purdy Avenue, West Avenue, Alton Road, Pennsylvania Avenue, Meridian Avenue, Collins Avenue, Washington Avenue and Indian Creek Drive. Water entered business, homes, apartment lobbies and parking garages. In Mary Brickell Village, more than 10 businesses and buildings had 1 to 4 824 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-11 inches of water inside the structures. The picture to the right, shows the 24-hour rainfall estimates between August 1st and 2nd. On August 2st, a tropical wave (Invest 97L) was located near the central Bahamas and was forecast to move northwestward over Florida. Wind shear and dry air hindered further development of this system, but the National Weather Service forecast an excessive rainfall threat for the remainder of the week. Rainfall amounts of 2 to 4 inches, with locally higher amounts possible, were forecast for the region. As a result, a Flood Watch was in effect for Miami-Dade County from August 24th through the 27th. Between August 24th and 26th, rainfall amounts ranged between 1 and 4 inches through the county. Rainfall amounts of up to 4.5 inches were recorded in the northeast portion of the county between August 26th and 28th. The only significant report received by the National Weather Service was of Okeechobee Road flooded in Hialeah and a spotter in the area recorded 6.62 inches of rain in a single afternoon on August 27th. Local flood events have been documented by the National Weather Service Miami Office and can be found at http://www.weather.gov/mfl/events_index. Flood Impacts The impact of floods could range anywhere from wet carpets or floors to damaged interiors leading to destruction of property. In addition, floods can potentially cause damage to infrastructure, such as washing out roads and bridges, or standing water inhibiting movement of vehicular or train traffic. Furthermore, floods also impact the agricultural community due to crops being inundated over an extended time or being washed away. Flooding, whether in rural or urban areas, can last up to several weeks as was the case during Hurricane Irene. 825 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-12 Flood Regulations in Miami-Dade Count y Pre-FIRM structures represent a potential flood hazard, in that, due to the relatively flat terrain, older structures built lower will experience more of a hazard than structures built to FIRM elevations. In fact, because newer structures may be sited close to the pre- FIRM buildings, their potential risk for flood damage may be even greater. The CRS Sub-Committee identified major milestones for flood regulation in Miami-Dade County as depicted in Table 2. Table 2: Major Flood Regulation Dates for Miami-Dade County (Nov. 2014) Map 2, provides an overview of the residential construction in relation to these major milestones. Individual jurisdictional maps were made available to all of the municipalities. This information was gathered from the Miami-Dade Property Appraiser database looking at the year of construction. This is meant to provide an overview of year of construction but does not tell us much about the elevation to which the structures were actually built but at least the standard in place at time of the original construction. There is not currently a comprehensive database of elevation certificates for all structures, though information is being gathered. Color Year Description % of housing stock Pre- 1957 No special elevation requirements in effect. 22.25% 1957- 1973 General Countywide requirement of the highest of the County Flood Criteria maps (10-year event) (CFC), back of sidewalk (BOS), or highest adjacent crown of road (COR) + 8 inches for residential or 4 inches for commercial construction 23.92% 1973- 1992 First FIRM maps developed identifying flood areas. CFC still enforced. 27.73% 1993- 2008 Incorporated areas begin enforcing flood codes. 24.12% 2009- 2011 Updated FEMA Flood Maps 1.33% 2012 - present New Florida Building Code requiring free board for properties within Special Flood Hazard areas, following ASCE24 Table, to be elevated depending on the building category 0.65% 826 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-13 Map 2: Residential Construction by Flood Regulation Milestones 827 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-14 Table 3 show the number of structures by the flood regulation milestones for each municipality. Table 3: Jurisdictional Residential Structures by Flood Milestones Jurisdiction Pre 1957 1957- 1973 1974- 1992 1993- 2008 2009- 2011 2012- Present Aventura 35 3740 10574 7533 66 70 Bal Harbour 457 810 1135 598 8 5 Bay Harbor 708 1380 167 139 5 28 Biscayne Park 943 89 36 2 1 0 Coral Gables 7,943 4,252 1,987 3,650 217 84 Cutler Bay 1,307 4,132 2,853 4,647 286 357 Doral 20 843 4,112 10,926 749 717 El Portal 682 47 4 14 1 2 Florida City 316 484 265 1,018 26 3 Golden Beach 141 29 77 86 10 6 Hialeah Gardens 4 273 2,148 3,210 5 37 Hialeah 14,882 12,762 16,910 5,606 58 55 Homestead 1,399 989 2,969 11,261 280 376 Indian Creek Village 7 4 6 13 2 0 Key Biscayne 570 2,352 2,317 1,192 41 60 Medley 19 20 21 14 1 31 Miami Beach 12,384 17,229 6,305 9,847 435 218 Miami Gardens 9,125 12,970 4,389 2,295 187 35 Miami Lakes 12 2,866 2,717 3,240 8 6 Miami Shores 3,120 538 177 80 3 2 Miami Springs 2,808 818 248 71 7 8 Miami 457 810 1,135 598 8 5 North Bay Village 709 1,392 581 713 39 1 North Miami Beach 6,161 5023 1,270 159 12 8 North Miami 8,305 5,271 1,217 644 15 9 Opa-locka 1,873 589 151 274 9 2 Palmetto Bay 348 4,452 2,152 965 12 13 Pinecrest 1,464 2,891 831 800 47 34 South Miami 1,929 743 541 565 16 17 Sunny Isles Beach 196 5,009 4,107 5,531 854 2 Surfside 1,144 714 644 616 3 1 Sweetwater 60 817 1,826 767 7 1 Virginia Gardens 435 128 50 8 0 0 West Miami 1,405 85 23 70 2 0 Unincorporated 41,310 75,601 120,150 70,366 1,689 2,574 Total: 114,755 166,743 196,220 154,794 5,641 5,400 828 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-15 Map 3 shows the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps that went into effect in 2009. Miami-Dade County is currently undergoing a new coastal study with maps projected to take effect in 2019. Map 3: FEMA Flood Zones Miami-Dade County 2009 829 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-16 Map 4 illustrates the number of buildings that are in FEMA Flood Zones for Miami-Dade County based upon the 2014 Miami-Dade Property Appraiser data and Table 4 provides a breakdown of buildings by jurisdiction. Map 4: Buildings By FEMA Flood Zones 830 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-17 Table 4: Buildings by Jurisdiction in Flood Zones (Nov. 2014) Jurisdiction A AE AH D VE X XE Aventura 24,149 52 31 Bal Harbour 738 955 2250 Bay Harbor 2576 Biscayne Park 991 42 42 Coral Gables 2770 1209 58 13209 1466 Cutler Bay 8840 1871 3886 Doral 93 3768 16746 El Portal 6 97 566 92 Florida City 3 2 1097 396 817 Golden Beach 262 98 Hialeah Gardens 133 271 5802 Hialeah 1304 18513 36496 Homestead 222 8824 9098 746 Indian Creek Village 33 4 1 Key Biscayne 7056 Medley 19 251 578 Miami Beach 51049 4381 123 Miami Gardens 12103 9083 8638 Miami Lakes 0 8317 1263 Miami Shores 843 3 19 2470 552 Miami Springs 11 2029 2125 21 Miami 43094 6441 3897 68535 2215 North Bay Village 3872 North Miami Beach 5650 7212 653 North Miami 8190 261 5637 1995 Opa-locka 714 543 1319 1275 Palmetto Bay 4701 41 3590 80 Pinecrest 2168 268 3563 260 South Miami 2 784 3660 Sunny Isles Beach 11351 1 7647 0 Surfside 1560 1878 Sweetwater 1 582 367 Virginia Gardens 122 445 86 West Miami 960 768 Unincorporated 582 44750 105976 2 28 169059 20053 Total: 585 247,570 152649 2 4305 381122 42164 831 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-18 Storm Surge One of the other areas of concern for flooding in Miami-Dade County is associated with storm surge inundation from tropical cyclones. Storms traveling from the east, south and west put Miami-Dade at risk from storm surge. To model storm surge, the Sea, Lake, and Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH) model is utilized. In 2010 the State of Florida conducted regional evacuation studies that included collecting updated topography information utilizing Light Imaging Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) data. The Miami-Dade Office of Emergency Management (OEM) was presented with the data to then go about setting areas for potential evacuation from storm surge. Map 5 is a depiction of the Maximum of Maximums (MOM) for a Category 5 Hurricane, on the Saffir-Simpson Scale. It should be noted that ranges of storm surge are no longer strictly tied to categories of hurricanes and with updated technology, OEM and the National Hurricane Center utilize directional information to better predict where storm surge will occur for each individual storm. Map 5 illustrates areas of the county that could potentially get surge from at least one direction of an impacting storm with winds of 157 mph and greater. Map 5: Maximum of Maximums (MOM) Storm Surge for Category 5 6 6 Superbasin SLOSH data 832 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-19 Map 6 depicts the areas OEM selected as Storm Surge Planning Zones, which indicate areas that are potentially at risk for storm surge and may be designated as evacuation areas. Table 5 lists the population in each zone and the estimated clearance times for evacuations. Map 6: Storm Surge Planning Zones 833 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-20 Table 5: Population Estimates and Evacuation Clearance Times for Storm Surge Planning Zones Risk Area Cumulative Mobile Homes Tourists In County Clearance Times 7 (hours) Out of County Clearance Times (hours) A 68,317 103,238 26 26 B 354,068 422,385 28 28 C 302,039 724,424 37 37 D 631,399 1,355,823 56 56 E 495,629 1,851,452 73 73 Total 1,851,452 1,954,690 *Clearance times from Base Scenario provided by SFRPC and FDEM on 5/12/2016. 7 In-county clearance time includes out-of-county trips from other counties that pass-through evacuation zones in the evacuating county. Therefore, clearance time for Miami-Dade County in all level B and higher will reflect the out-of-county clearance time for Monroe County. Source: Regional Evacuation Transportation Analysis, South Florida Regional Planning Council 834 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-21 Map 7 provides an illustration of the buildings by type within the storm surge planning zones and Tables 6 and 7 provide a listing of building types by jurisdiction within the storm surge planning zones. Map 7: Buildings within Storm Surge Planning Zones 835 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-22 Table 6: Commercial and Industrial Facilities by Municipality in Storm Surge Planning Zones COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL JURISDICTION Count Bldg Value Count Bldg Value AVENTURA 237 412,642,130 25 20,710,431 BAL HARBOUR 682 1,652,267,919 BAY HARBOR ISLANDS 97 45,250,603 BISCAYNE PARK CORAL GABLES 1,304 1,530,909,828 17 7,604,059 CUTLER BAY 107 110,484,222 2 4,010,204 DORAL 635 895,123,737 2,356 1,599,282,733 EL PORTAL 7 1,447,630 1 1,295,212 FLORIDA CITY 125 110,424,581 40 20,540,233 GOLDEN BEACH HIALEAH 1,591 732,427,700 2,627 671,506,281 HIALEAH GARDENS 169 $ 94,480,379 308 80,697,399 HOMESTEAD 521 244,987,653 180 43,318,083 INDIAN CREEK VILLAGE 673 689,693,968 KEY BISCAYNE 295 188,279,601 1,413 334,011,832 MEDLEY 52 19,590,981 11 1,756,701 MIAMI 16,223 7,741,130,240 374 341,494,663 MIAMI BEACH 7,995 4,532,548,698 409 169,096,549 MIAMI GARDENS 404 487,906,023 1 84,384 MIAMI LAKES 157 249,934,462 8 2,711,847 MIAMI SHORES 76 34,542,122 2 4,402,072 MIAMI SPRINGS 171 139,483,910 2,627 671,506,281 NORTH BAY VILLAGE 137 51,551,085 308 80,697,399 NORTH MIAMI 609 259,531,912 133 46,813,127 NORTH MIAMI BEACH 498 302,658,179 56 15,192,672 OPA-LOCKA 175 $30,374,557 631 165,797,265 PALMETTO BAY 247 154,986,293 1 1,540,548 PINECREST 143 122,847,307 1 185,510 SOUTH MIAMI 548 199,298,249 33 3,756,442 SUNNY ISLES BEACH 1,322 317,161,218 SURFSIDE 48 11,408,102 SWEETWATER 138 396,044,015 351 179,049,169 UNINCORP. MIAMI-DADE 5,957 3,388,837,629 8,306 2,953,844,452 VIRGINIA GARDENS 23 25,527,254 3 5,937,275 WEST MIAMI 97 20,717,177 29 3,467,223 TOTAL 40,790 24,504,805,396 17,991 7,367,800,334 836 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-23 Table 7: Residential and Other Structures by Municipality within Storm Surge Zones RESIDENTIAL OTHER JURISDICTION Count Bldg Value Count Bldg Value AVENTURA 22,067 $7,353,362,771 1,903 $589,998,701 BAL HARBOUR 3,013 $2,065,111,108 248 $143,291,649 BAY HARBOR ISLANDS 2,432 $544,847,704 47 $40,082,298 BISCAYNE PARK 1,070 $131,726,494 5 $816,927 CORAL GABLES 16,935 $6,065,921,180 456 $493,996,179 CUTLER BAY 13,596 $1,500,319,689 892 $153,280,837 DORAL 17,372 $2,976,510,794 244 $510,299,633 EL PORTAL 749 $80,758,362 4 $2,429,256 FLORIDA CITY 2,070 $104,940,748 80 $53,801,677 GOLDEN BEACH 354 $229,696,574 6 $836,173 HIALEAH 49,669 $4,671,419,681 2,426 $786,394,680 HIALEAH GARDENS 5,650 $640,297,886 79 $207,677,998 HOMESTEAD 17,068 $1,293,836,792 1,121 $385,041,980 INDIAN CREEK VILLAGE 32 $135,218,524 6 $5,148,996 KEY BISCAYNE 6,533 $4,884,340,942 228 $493,353,379 MEDLEY 74 $3,832,240 49 $20,362,160 MIAMI 98,703 $19,249,522,305 7,843 $3,738,123,952 MIAMI BEACH 46,212 $17,507,335,275 1,335 $1,102,579,306 MIAMI GARDENS 28,738 $2,264,882,565 308 $322,407,043 MIAMI LAKES 8,839 $1,439,202,664 175 $196,979,129 MIAMI SHORES 3,768 $583,932,844 42 $93,159,747 MIAMI SPRINGS 3,954 $545,454,373 53 $65,356,328 NORTH BAY VILLAGE 3,442 $589,832,119 291 $80,300,567 NORTH MIAMI 14,801 $1,504,945,907 540 $260,808,569 NORTH MIAMI BEACH 12,046 $1,185,919,717 915 $163,507,298 OPA-LOCKA 2,904 $203,527,749 141 $103,738,423 PALMETTO BAY 7,917 $1,598,412,469 247 $103,338,624 PINECREST 6,074 $1,949,510,915 41 $79,305,464 SOUTH MIAMI 3,781 $646,507,410 84 $119,948,075 SUNNY ISLES BEACH 15,699 $8,023,905,384 1,978 $585,459,453 SURFSIDE 3,122 $843,630,141 268 $198,206,935 SWEETWATER 3,481 $430,623,942 321 $104,650,928 UNINCORP. MIAMI-DADE 312,085 $36,683,366,293 14,112 $6,651,747,383 VIRGINIA GARDENS 621 $69,027,146 6 $6,796,096 WEST MIAMI 1,585 $186,718,443 17 $8,495,008 TOTAL 736,456 $128,188,399,150 36,511 $17,871,720,851 837 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-24 Sea Level Rise Incorporation of the future threat of sea level rise presents challenges in that the consideration and determination of what the potential impacts will be vary depending upon the modeling variables that are considered. The Office of Resilience will continue to lead the charge in working with agencies to implement the Climate Action Plan. A review of the Climate Action Plan can be found in Part 4 Appendix I, Integration Document. The LMS will continue to identify areas where climate change and sea level rise can be integrated into mitigation planning. The Vulnerability Assessment performed for Miami-Dade County was added to the THIRA, see Part 4 Appendix J. During the Evaluation and Appraisal Report adopted in 2011, climate change was identified as one of the priorities to address in the County’s Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP). Miami-Dade has incorporated climate change considerations and language in several of the Elements of the CDMP update which was approved by the Board of County Commissioners in October 2013. These policies now form a sound foundation for Miami-Dade County to begin actively incorporating these considerations into existing capital investment and infrastructure planning processes. Map 8 provides a demonstration of the possible impacts of sea level rise in Miami-Dade County and was developed from data collected for the Climate Change Compact. Additional information is provided in Part 4, Appendix I. 838 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-25 Map 8: Potential Sea Level Rise Impacts Miami-Dade 839 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-26 Mapping Integration To provide greater access to County data layers to the LMSWG, OEM has integrated a number of data layers to our geographic information mapping based system known as the Florida Interoperable Picture Processing for Emergency Responders (FLIPPER). The LMS Chair worked with the Information Technology Department representative assigned to OEM to identify data layers and information to assist with drawing linkages and integrating mapping into the LMS Projects. The following actions have occurred since 2013: • Upgraded the way LMS Projects are tracked to build in additional information including flood basins and address locations • Additional layers added to FLIPPER for stakeholders to access including: o Hydrology and Topology  Canal Structures  Canal By Type  Canal Maintained By  Primary Canal Basin  Contour Lines – Ground Elevation o FEMA Panels o FEMA Flood Zone - to the parcel level o SLOSH data, by directional Maximum Envelopes of Water (MEOW) and Maximum of Maximums (MOM) In 2015, the new Mapper feature in WebEOC was launched to map LMS Projects. This will help us identify areas where multiple projects may be occurring or areas where mitigation projects may need to be considered Through FLIPPER agencies can assess the risk of their facilities from potential storm surge, determine overall elevation of the land surrounding their facilities and determine proximity to canal structures and which drainage basin they are in. Presentations have been provided to community agencies and through the LMSWG meetings and the LMS Information Bulletin on how to utilize the system. Primary Drainage Basins Maps 9 and 10 provides illustration of the location of the canal systems in Miami-Dade to the drainage basins. The LMS will continue to work with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), DTPW and other responsible parties for canal mitigation measures. Our communities are very reliant upon the ability of the canals to provide drainage. Map 9 shows how canal basis cross jurisdictional lines and how it is paramount for us to help track where drainage projects are planned so we can best collaborate with one another to continue to mitigate flood hazards. 840 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-27 Map 9: Drainage Basins with Canals Identified 841 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-28 Map 10: Municipal Boundaries in Relation to Drainage Basins 842 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-29 Repetitive Loss Properties Repetitive loss data has been gathered from FEMA and NFIP to help guide local mitigation measures. Most of the repetitive losses sites are identified, funded and mitigated through several Miami-Dade County programs, such as the Stormwater Management Master Plan, Flood Inspections, Quality Neighborhoods Improvement Program, Public Works Capital Budget, General Obligation Bond, Stormwater Utility and Secondary Canal Dredging Programs. The objective of this program is the mitigation of localized flooding problems not identified or addressed in any other programs, including flooding of residential units above their finished floor elevations, through the construction of minor drainage improvements at various locations throughout Miami- Dade County. These sites (residential/commercial or industrial facilities) are reported by FEMA on a yearly basis as having experienced flooding above their finished floor elevations, two (2) times or more with a damage claim of $1,000.00 or more each time. Map 11 shows the repetitive loss areas within the county. Miami Dade was unable to obtain data on all municipalities on repetitive loss and severe repetitive losses in 2017. Map 11: Repetitive Loss Areas, General Map 843 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-30 Map 12 shows all repetitive loss properties throughout the county as reported through NFIP. This map does not show us uninsured or privately insured losses. Map 12: Un-Mitigated Repetitive Loss Properties Address Count 844 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-31 Table 8 shows the number and type of structures that have been reported and having repetitive losses that have not been mitigated. Table 8: Repetitive Losses by Jurisdiction* Jurisdiction Years 2-4 Family Assmd- Condo Non Resident Other Res. Single Fam. Total Aventura 1981-2013 0 1 2 8 5 16 Bal Harbour 1992-2000 0 1 0 0 0 1 Bay Harbor Islands 1994-2000 0 0 0 0 1 1 Biscayne Park 1984-2013 0 0 0 0 3 3 Coral Gables 1981-2011 0 0 2 2 20 24 Cutler Bay 1981-2011 0 0 0 0 32 32 Doral 1991-2012 0 5 36 17 11 69 El Portal 1999-2007 0 0 1 0 4 5 Florida City 1981-2011 1 0 0 0 44 45 Golden Beach 1999-2013 0 0 0 0 3 0 Hialeah 1979-2014 14 4 19 4 165 206 Hialeah Gardens 1998-2014 1 0 15 0 24 40 Homestead 2000-2011 0 1 7 5 23 36 Indian Creek Village - 0 0 0 0 0 Key Biscayne 1981-2011 0 0 1 1 3 5 Medley 1979-2011 0 2 12 0 0 14 Miami 1979-2014 28 9 23 23 154 240 Miami Beach 1981-2013 3 4 11 21 44 83 Miami Gardens 1994-2011 0 0 1 0 24 25 Miami Lakes 1995-2005 0 0 1 0 12 13 Miami Shores 1980-2005 0 0 0 0 7 7 Miami Springs 1991-2006 3 2 4 0 60 69 North Bay Village 1991-2005 0 0 0 0 7 7 North Miami 1980-2013 2 0 3 1 37 43 North Miami Beach 1994-2013 1 0 4 0 11 16 Opa-locka 1979-2007 0 3 2 2 8 15 Palmetto Bay 1992-2011 0 0 1 0 10 11 Pinecrest 1981-2013 0 0 3 0 11 14 South Miami 1999-2005 0 0 1 0 6 7 Sunny Isles Beach 1995-2013 0 0 0 3 2 5 Surfside 1991-2000 0 0 1 0 2 3 Sweetwater 1981-2005 16 0 0 0 67 83 Virginia Gardens 1991-2010 0 0 0 1 7 8 West Miami 1981-2000 0 0 0 0 29 29 Unincorporated Area 1979-2014 58 17 104 62 2072 2313 Total 3569 *December 12, 2014 National Flood Database Non-Mitigated Properties Data from 1979-2014 845 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-32 Map 13 shows the range of value for loss claims by flood basin for un-mitigated properties. Map 13: Repetitive Loss Claims by Value by Flood Basin 846 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-33 Impact Assessment As part of the Hazard Impact and Assessment Plan (HIAP), OEM is currently working on how to better assess the potential and actual impacts of event. This involves gathering data before, during and after an event. Figure 1 is extracted from the HIAP to provide an overview of how this will be accomplished. The HIAP can be found in Volume III of the Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP). Figure 1: Impact Assessments: Before, During and After an Event Determination of a Significant Rain Event To help local communities determine if a rain event is considered significant the following site and chart from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Hydrometeorological Design Studies Center maintains the Precipitation Frequency Data Server (PFDS) which is a point-and-click interface developed to deliver NOAA Atlas 14 precipitation frequency estimates and associated information. To determine the amounts and rates of rain that could create a various internal rain event (e.g 100 year or 500 year) this website provides local information: http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_map_cont.html?bkmrk=fl. Using a location in Miami-Dade County with a 7-foot elevation, the following chart depicts the rainfall amounts per an interval of time that could determine if a significant rain event has occurred. 847 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-34 Figure 2: Significant Rain Event Chart Miami-Dade Communities will be able to utilize this source to help identify significant rain events in their areas based on rain fall amounts. 848 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-35 Tracking Local Rainfall Amounts The Miami-Dade DTPW maintains a number of rain gauges that collect breakpoint and rain total information over a 24-hour period of time. A review of this data may help identify when significant rain events have occurred and allow us to better document and track rain events. Figure 3: DTPW Rain Gauge and Canal Monitoring In addition to the DTPW rain gauges and NOAA information, rainfall and canal stage data are tracked through SFWMD real-time gauge website, where provisional data is posted: http://www.sfwmd.gov/portal/page/portal/levelthree/live%20data. 849 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-36 Figure 4: SFWMD DBHYDRO Map Evaluations of past events are also analyzed using data from the SFWMD Database (DBHYDRO), where breakpoint data for rainfall, stages and flows are available: 850 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-37 Impact Assessment System OEM utilizes a damage assessment tool to help standardize how everyone reports damages called ARM360. It provides a progressive system where information can be collected starting from impact areas, through detailed structural assessments. In order to help provide information to command centers on where the damages have occurred, ARM360 has been designed for field assessment data to be gathered on a local device (tablet or laptop), and via the internet, synchronize through a companion viewer. This system is being made available to stakeholders and can be used to track any type of event, including localized flooding events. A guide and training on reporting flood and structural damages for mobile\manufactured homes, single and multi-family homes, and mid and high-rise structures was developed in conjunction with local building officials. It is hoped that this system will help us better track localized impacts and damages that may not be captured in the NFIP RL data. Higher Regulatory Standards Since the establishment of the former Miami-Dade County Department of Environmental Resource Management (DERM) in 1974 (now the Division of Environmental Resources Management in the Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources), Miami-Dade County has developed several comprehensive and innovative programs such as the Northwest Wellfield Protection Plan to protect the Biscayne Aquifer, the County’s primary source of drinking water. Moreover, since the adoption of the CDMP in 1975, Miami-Dade County has been sensitive to the multiple challenges of water resource management. The present County programs also implement stormwater management plans to eliminate pollution to water bodies: freshwater, estuarine, and coastal, and natural areas management, to eliminate the invasion of exotic pest plants that threaten native ecosystems. Through local and regional partnerships, the County will continue to work towards sustainable development patterns, while protecting unique natural resources critical to the County’s and the South Florida economy. The environmental sensitivity of Miami-Dade County is underscored by the fact that the urban portion lies between two national parks, Everglades and Biscayne National Parks, and the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. The close proximity of an expanding urbanized area to national and State resource-based parks, and over 6,000 acres of natural areas within County parks, presents a unique challenge to Miami-Dade County to provide sound management. The County has addressed this challenge in several ways including working closely with other public and private sector agencies and groups to obtain a goal of sustainability. The close relationship of tourism to the preservation of Miami-Dade County’s unique native plants, wildlife, beaches, and near shore water quality is recognized as both an economic and an environmental issue. The Conservation Element builds upon past and present initiatives such as the East Everglades Resource Management Plan, and planning for the Bird Drive-Everglades, Arch Creek, and C-111 Basins, the Governor’s Commission on a Sustainable Everglades Restoration Plan, the GreenPrint, the County’s plan for sustainability, and over four decades of local planning, monitoring, and evaluating proposed activities in wetlands and uplands. 851 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-38 Chapter 11C of the Code of Miami-Dade County This is the County-wide flood protection ordinance, establishing rules for development within or outside the Special Flood Hazard Areas, including minimum fill criteria (CFC) for lots and roadways, minimum elevation criteria for the lowest floor, which is the elevation of the back of sidewalk (BOS), or highest adjacent crown of road (COR) + 8 inches for residential or 4 inches for commercial construction Chapter 24 of the Code of Miami-Dade County This is the County-Wide Miami-Dade County Environmental Protection Ordinance, focused on the protection of water resources, particularly the Biscayne Bay and wellfield protection. Requires compliance with water quality standards for surface waters, water and wastewater treatment plants; requires drainage for all new construction; preserves native trees; protects against dumping to ground or surface waters; prohibits cutting or altering mangroves without a permit; regulates development in wellfield protection areas. Regarding flood protection, this ordinance include provisions for preservation of the storage capacity, making reference to Chapter 40E-40 of FAC and Cut and Fill Criteria, for special basins. 2010 Florida Building Code Effective March 15, 2012 the Florida Building Code incorporates flood resistant provisions that apply to buildings and structures in flood hazard areas, establishes a one-foot freeboard requirement for non-residential structures, and extra freeboard for structures in V zones, depending on the type of construction. Building Code Efficiency Grading System (BCEGS) Communities that apply for BCEGS get credit in their Building or other departments for how they regulate new construction activities. Activities such as requiring multiple inspections during construction; increasing levels of education and experience of the Inspectors; mentoring junior building staff; using the International Building Codes for compliance with standards; and other activities gain credit in CRS. Chapter 40-E.40 F.A.C. Effective March 15, 2012 the Florida Building Code incorporates flood resistant provisions that apply to buildings and structures in flood hazard areas. Miami-Dade County Flood Criteria Implemented in 1970, this is a general Countywide requirement for minimum elevation of roadways and lots. This criteria is equivalent to the 10-year groundwater table plus a 3.5-foot freeboard. It was initially implemented to guarantee minimum ground elevations to prevent frequent flooding, and to allow the installation of septic tanks drains at adequate elevations. Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) Permit required for any development that includes two or more acres of impervious areas, up to 100 acres. This permit requires establishing minimum elevations for structures, roads, and requires drainage systems that capture runoff within the property. This permit improves stormwater quality and reduces flooding through its standards. 852 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-39 Environmental Resource Management Plans: Biscayne Bay Management Plan Approved in 1981 addressed canal discharge and storm water runoff, water clarity, recreational and developmental user impacts and habitat management. Cut and Fill Criteria Cut and Fill Criteria was created to ensure that development occurring in the western reaches of Miami-Dade County did not worsen flooding conditions for those areas or areas to the east. This is done by establishing criteria that requires setting aside lands for stormwater management whenever projects are proposed in those areas. • East Everglades Resource Management Plan • Bird Drive-Everglades • Arch Creek • C-111 Basin • Environmentally Endangered Lands Program (EEL) The State of Florida and Miami-Dade County are implementing higher regulatory standards to address the future threat of sea level rise through the designation of Adaptation Action Areas. Chapter 163.3177, Florida Statutes 163.3177(6)(g). …The coastal management element shall set forth the principles, guidelines, standards, and strategies that shall guide the local government’s decisions and program implementation with respect to the following objectives: (10) At the option of the local government, develop an adaptation action area designation for those low-lying coastal zones that are experiencing coastal flooding due to extreme high tides and storm surge and are vulnerable to the impacts of rising sea level. Local governments that adopt an adaptation action area may consider policies within the coastal management element to improve resilience to coastal flooding resulting from high-tide events, storm surge, flash floods, stormwater runoff, and related impacts of sea-level rise. Criteria for the adaptation action area may include, but need not be limited to, areas for which the land elevations are below, at, or near mean higher high water, which have a hydrologic connection to coastal waters, or which are designated as evacuation zones for storm surge. Miami-Dade County CDMP 8 Conservation, Aquifer and Recharge Element It is the intent of this Element to identify, conserve, appropriately use, protect and restore as necessary the biological, geological and hydrological resources of Miami- Dade County. Since the adoption of the Comprehensive Development Master Plan 8 The CDMP is undergoing an update in 2017 and this section will be updated with any changes or additions once it has been adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. 853 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-40 (CDMP) in 1975, Miami-Dade County has been committed to protection of environmentally sensitive wetlands and aquifer recharge and water storage areas. Protecting and restoring environmentally sensitive uplands has been recognized as important to the County’s present and future, thus, Miami-Dade County has sought to channel growth toward those areas that are most intrinsically suited for development. This Element and the proposed natural resources objectives, policies and maps in the Land Use Element and Coastal Management Element continue that established trend. In addition, many experts suggest that South Florida will be significantly affected by rising sea levels, intensifying droughts, floods, and hurricanes as a result of climate change. As a partner in the four county Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact, Miami-Dade has committed to study the potential negative impacts to the County given climate change projections, and is working to analyze strategies to adapt to these impacts and protect the built environment and natural resources. Policy CON-2A: The basin stormwater master plans produced by Miami-Dade County pursuant to Objective CON-5 will continue to prioritize the listing of stormwater/drainage improvements to correct existing system deficiencies and problems and to provide for future development. At a minimum, these lists shall include: • Drainage/stormwater sewer systems within wellfield protection areas; • Drainage/stormwater sewer systems in industrial and heavy business areas and areas with large concentrations of small hazardous waste generators; • Basins and sub-basins that fail to meet the target criteria for the twelve NPDES priority pollutants listed in Policy CON-5A and additional parameters, referenced in CON-5A. Policy CON-2B. Miami-Dade County's Stormwater Utility Program shall fund the identification and retrofitting of deteriorated storm sewer systems and positive outfalls and the proper maintenance of stormwater systems. Policy CON-2F. Miami-Dade County shall continue to utilize Best Management Practices established for potential sources of water pollution, that discharge wastewater to the ground, to reduce environmental risk and, where possible, to begin effective water reuse and recycling. Established management practices may be reviewed and modified as new science becomes available. New management practices shall be developed for new potential sources of water pollution as they are identified. Policy CON-2G. Best Management Practices for potential sources of water pollution shall include reduction in the use of hazardous materials and, wherever possible, the reuse and recycling of materials on site. Best Management Practices shall also be established to address those wastes that must be removed from site, including reusing and recycling of the waste in other operations. All practical recycling and reuse alternatives shall be investigated before seeking permanent disposal of hazardous wastes. Policy CON-2J. Miami-Dade County shall continue to enforce a 500-foot protection zone for non-community, non-transient water supplies that serve uses such as public or private schools and trailer parks. 854 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-41 Policy CON-2K. Miami-Dade County shall use the data generated in its ambient ground and surface water monitoring programs to determine levels of concentrations for the twelve National Pollution Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES) priority pollutants, as well as for the additional recommended NPDES parameters referenced in Policy CON- 5A and any other pollutants of interest. Policy CON-3A. No new facilities that use, handle, generate, transport or dispose of hazardous wastes shall be permitted within wellfield protection areas, and all existing facilities that use, handle, generate, transport or dispose of more than the maximum allowable quantity of hazardous wastes (as specified in Chapter 24-43 of the Code of Miami-Dade County, as may be amended from time to time) within wellfield protection areas shall be required to take substantial measures such as secondary containment and improved operating procedures to ensure environmentally safe operations. Policy CON-3B. The water management systems that recharge regional wellfields shall be protected and enhanced. Policy CON-3F. The ambient groundwater monitoring program, which includes all wellfield protection areas, shall be continued to serve as an "early warning system" for monitoring high- risk land uses and point sources. Policy CON-4B. All future development and redevelopment shall use retention, infiltration and detention systems to retain to the maximum extent feasible, the full runoff from a one in five year storm and minimize the use of impermeable surfaces. In the event that an emergency overflow is provided, a minimum of the first inch of runoff shall be retained on-site. Policy CON-4C. The approved fill encroachment criteria for the Western C-9 Basin as established by the South Florida Water Management District and for all other basins as established by the Miami-Dade County Division of Environmental Resource Management (Basin B, North Trail and Bird Drive) shall continue to govern the extent to which land can be filled, and additional fill encroachment criteria shall be developed for all the undeveloped, poorly drained areas in western and southern Miami-Dade County which are determined to have urban development potential. These criteria shall retain the predevelopment net recharge and runoff values for basin areas. Policy CON-4D. Water conserving irrigation and other landscape practices such as Florida Friendly landscaping shall be used wherever feasible. Through its site and landscape reviews, Miami-Dade County shall ensure that appropriate native and Florida Friendly landscaping plant materials are used, particularly in the salt-intruded areas of the County where public water is used to water lawns, golf courses and landscaped green spaces. Policy CON-4E. Miami-Dade County shall continue to investigate the feasibility of large- scale water reuse through water reuse demonstration projects and other appropriate means. Investigate the suitability of reused water in wetland hydration. CON-4F. The Miami-Dade County Division of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) shall work with the County's Cooperative Extension Department to develop 855 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-42 guidelines for improving the efficiency and/or uniformity of irrigation systems for appropriate crops grown in Miami-Dade County. Policy CON-4G. In accordance with the goals of the South Florida Water Management District’s Lower East Coast Regional Water Supply Plan and Objective WS-7, and its related policies, Miami-Dade County shall develop alternative water supply sources to supplement withdrawals from the Biscayne Aquifer. Such sources may include withdrawals from the Floridan Aquifer, implementation of water conservation methods and projects, and development of reclaimed and wastewater reuse strategies and projects. Policy CON-5A. The Stormwater Management (Drainage) Level of Service (LOS) Standards for Miami-Dade County contain both a Flood Protection (FPLOS) and Water Quality (WQLOS) component. The minimum acceptable Flood Protection Level of Service (FPLOS) standards for Miami-Dade County shall be protection from the degree of flooding that would result for a duration of one day from a ten-year storm, with exceptions in previously developed canal basins as provided below, where additional development to this base standard would pose a risk to existing development. All structures shall be constructed at, or above, the minimum floor elevation specified in the federal Flood Insurance Rate Maps for Miami-Dade County, or as specified in Chapter 11-C of the Miami-Dade County Code, whichever is higher. 1. Basin-specific FPLOS standards shall be established through the adoption of a Stormwater Master Plan to be approved by the Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners and the South Florida Water Management District. Until the approval of basin-specific FPLOS standards through this coordinated process, the following additional exceptions shall apply: a) Wherever Miami-Dade County has adopted cut and fill criteria pursuant to Chapter 24-48.3(6) of the County Code (November 30, 2004) including fill encroachment limitations necessary to prevent unsafe flood stages in special drainage basins, the minimum applicable FPLOS standard shall be the degree of protection provided by the applicable cut and fill criteria; b) Where cut and fill criteria have not been established north of S.W. 152 Street inside the Urban Development Boundary (UDB), the minimum acceptable FPLOS standard shall be protection from the degree of flooding that would result for a duration of one day from a ten-year storm; c) West of Levee-31 N, there shall be no off-site drainage, all septic tank drainfields shall be elevated above the hundred-year flood elevation, and the extent of land filling shall be minimized as provided in applicable provisions of the Miami-Dade County East Everglades Zoning Overlay Ordinance. The County shall review these criteria when the water management facilities programmed in the N.E. Shark River Slough General Design Memorandum and the C-111 General Reconnaissance Review are fully operational. 856 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-43 2. The Stormwater Management Water Quality Level of Service (WQLOS) component of the standard shall be met when the annual geometric mean for each of the following twelve priority NPDES pollutants does not exceed the following target criteria for each of those pollutants within a canal basin, or sub-basin, as determined in accordance with procedures established by Miami-Dade County DERM: Pollutant Target Criterion • Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD): 9 mg/l • Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD): 65 mg/l • Total Suspended Solids (TSS): 40 mg/l • Total Dissolved Solids (TDS):1,000 mg/l • Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (Ammonia-Nitrogen and Organic Nitrogen): 1.5 mg/l • Total Nitrate (NOX-N): 0.68 mg/l • Total Phosphate (TPO4): 0.33 mg/l • Dissolved Phosphate (OPO4): Not Available • Cadmium (Cd): 0.0023 mg/l • Copper (Cu): 0.0258 mg/l • Lead (Pb): 0.0102 mg/l • Zinc (Zn): 0.231 mg/l Additionally, recommended NPDES parameters may not exceed established Federal, State or Local Criteria for the water body, as listed in Table 2, “Guidance for Preparing Monitoring Plan as recommended for Phase I Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permits,” FDEP August 1, 2009. 3. Applicants seeking development orders in canal basins, or sub-basins that do not meet either the FPLOS or the WQLOS shall be required to conform to Best Management Practices (BMPs) as provided by Miami-Dade County Code. Owners of commercial or industrial properties where BMPs are required, shall, at a minimum, demonstrate that their on-site stormwater system is inspected two times per year and maintained and cleaned as required. Private residential developments in areas where BMPs are required shall demonstrate that their on-site stormwater systems are inspected two times per year and maintained and cleaned as required. Policy CON-5B. Applicants seeking development orders approving any new use or site alteration outside the Urban Development Boundary where the elevation of any portion of the site will remain below County Flood Criteria shall be advised by the permitting agency that those portions of the land that are not filled to Miami-Dade County Flood Criteria may be subject to periodic flooding. Policy CON-5C. Miami-Dade County shall work with the South Florida Water Management District to better identify the developed urban areas within the County that do not have protection from a one in 10-year storm. The County shall develop stormwater management criteria and plans for all unincorporated areas identified. 857 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-44 Where such areas fall within municipal boundaries, the County will coordinate the stormwater management planning with the appropriate municipality(ies). Policy CON-5D. Miami-Dade County shall seek funding for a comprehensive basin-by- basin drainage engineering study which will include: identification of public drainage facilities and private drainage facilities that impact the public facilities, and the entities having operational responsibility for them; establishment of geographic service areas for the drainage facilities; and, a facility capacity analysis by geographic service area for the planning periods 2015 and 2025. Policy CON-5E. Miami-Dade County shall establish a priority listing of stormwater drainage and aquifer recharge improvements needed to correct existing system deficiencies and problems, and to provide for future drinking water needs. This shall include: • Drainage/stormwater sewer system improvements in developed urban areas with persistent drainage problems; • Canal and/or stormwater drainage improvements in developed urban areas that have less than one in 10-year storm protection and where no roadway drainage improvements are planned or proposed, which would remedy the problems; • Hydrologic modifications that are needed to deliver water to public waterwells or to protect those waterwells from prospective contamination. This shall be based on such factors as: • Miles of canals with out-of-bank flow; • Miles of collector and local streets impassable during a 5-year storm; • Miles of minor arterial streets impassable during a 10-year storm; • Miles of principal arterials, including major evacuation routes, that are impassable during a 100-year storm; and • Number or structures flooded by a 100-year storm. Policy CON-5F. Miami-Dade County shall implement cut and fill criteria for land in the North Trail, Bird Drive, Basin B, and Western C-9 basins, as defined in Chapter 24 of the County Code, and other areas west of the easterly boundary of Area B identified in the Corps of Engineers Design Memorandum V Supplement 12 dated March 23, 1954, as necessary to protect natural hydrological characteristics of the basins, protect against flooding of developed land in the basins and downstream, and ensure continued proper recharge of groundwater supplies. Policy CON-5G. Miami-Dade County shall encourage, based on analysis of water impoundment areas, the need for buffers between water impoundment areas and development in order to increase the level of flood protection provided to developed areas. Policy CON-5H. Miami-Dade County shall periodically evaluate stormwater drainage criteria as outlined in the County Code to ensure proper flood protection is being provided to County residents. 858 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-45 Policy CON-5I. When building, expanding or planning for new facilities such as water treatment plants, Miami-Dade County shall consider areas that will be impacted by sea level rise. Policy CON-7A. The degradation or destruction of wetlands shall be limited to activities that 1) are necessary to prevent or eliminate a threat to public health, safety or welfare; or 2) are water dependent, clearly in the public interest and no other reasonable alternative exists; or 3) are carried out in accordance with an approved basin management plan; or 4) are in areas that have been highly disturbed or degraded and where restoration of a wetland with an equal or greater value in accordance with federal, State and local regulations is feasible. Habitats critical to endangered or threatened species shall not be degraded or destroyed. Policy CON-7C. Miami-Dade County shall continue to promote the restoration and maintenance of the natural, surface water flow regimes into, and through wetland systems such as the Shark River Slough, Everglades National Park and the saline wetlands of southeastern Miami-Dade County. Policy CON-7D. Management plans shall be developed to govern all development activity within all natural communities on County-owned lands to protect natural and historic resources. The Division of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) and the Office of Historic and Archeological Resources shall assist the appropriate County agencies in the development of these plans, which shall be subject to public review and comment as they are prepared and implemented. Policy CON-7E. All wetlands on the State Save Our Rivers, Florida Forever or Miami- Dade County Environmentally Endangered Lands acquisition lists shall be given very high priority for public acquisition as are all lands within the Environmental Protection category on the Land Use Plan (LUP) map. Policy CON-7F. Wetland mitigation areas shall be preferentially located in biologically degraded wetlands and serve as corridors between Resources of Regional Significance. Policy CON-7G. Miami-Dade County shall continue to work with the appropriate federal, State, regional and local agencies to develop wetland basin management plans for all the planned future wetlands areas in Miami-Dade County. Miami-Dade County shall continue to coordinate with all levels of government in their respective permitting functions in order to retain the long term, net wetland values of these areas. Priority for plan development shall be given to the wetlands in South Miami-Dade County that are slated for purchase under the Save Our Rivers, Florida Forever and Miami-Dade County Environmentally Endangered Lands programs. Policy CON-7H. Miami-Dade County shall provide new dedicated funding sources that are in addition to current sources and expiring revenue streams for the long-term management and maintenance of Environmentally Endangered Lands and publicly owned Natural Forest Communities by 2020. This shall be funded from ad valorem tax 859 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-46 revenues unless other revenue streams sufficient for this purpose are identified and implemented prior to 2020. Policy CON-7I. Miami-Dade County shall coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District in order to implement strategies to streamline the wetland permitting process, which may include but not be limited to the delegation of additional permitting functions to the County. Policy CON-7J. In evaluating applications that will result in alterations or adverse impacts to wetlands Miami-Dade County shall consider the applications’ consistency with Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Program (CERP) objectives. Applications that are found to be inconsistent with CERP objectives, projects or features shall be denied. Policy CON-8A. Specimen trees and Natural Forest Communities in Miami-Dade County shall be protected through the maintenance and enforcement of the County's Tree and Forest Protection and Landscape Code, as may be amended from time to time. The County's Natural Forest Inventory shall be revised periodically to reflect current Natural Forest Community conditions. A Natural Forest Community shall not be removed from the inventory unless its quality and resource values have been degraded to the point where it cannot be restored. Policy CON-8B. The environmentally sensitive hardwood hammocks and the pinelands on the Florida Forever and Miami-Dade County Environmentally Endangered Lands Acquisition lists shall be given very high priority for public acquisition as are lands within the Environmental Protection category on the Land Use Plan (LUP) map. Policy CON-8C. Development in the forested portions of publicly owned Natural Forest Communities designated by the Board of County Commissioners pursuant to Resolution No. R-1764-84, as may be amended from time to time, shall be permitted only if it is clearly in the public interest, there is no feasible alternative, and such development does not adversely impact other remaining natural forest resources on-site. Policy CON-8D. Where hammocks or pinelands are contained within prospective development sites, they shall be given priority for designation as landscape and open space areas and left intact. The extent of hammock and pineland area destroyed shall be minimized by the use of native plant buffers, clustering, large lot zoning, and/or reduced roadway widths. Care shall be exercised when developing adjacent land to minimize root damage and filling. Disturbance to the forest canopy and understory shall be minimized and confined to the least viable areas. Preservation areas shall be located and configured to protect rare, threatened and endangered species and to allow for prescribed burning, where applicable. In the protected forest areas, understory vegetation and associated geologic features shall be protected and maintained in perpetuity. Policy CON-8E. The destruction of environmentally sensitive Natural Forest Communities shall be kept to a minimum; a long-term mitigation and management plan shall be developed to assure the continued maintenance of the remaining forest lands 860 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-47 and the restoration or creation of at least an equal amount of forest lands to those destroyed. Policy CON-8F. Miami-Dade County shall continue to seek natural areas land management funds to conduct prescribed burns, and other appropriate techniques to establish the appropriate fire regime for natural areas, while minimizing deleterious off- target effects to native plant and animal species and negative impacts to the public health, safety and welfare. The County shall also seek funds to control and remove exotic plant species from public rights-of-way and other County-owned land outside of parks and natural areas. Policy CON-8G. The Natural Forest Communities that are owned by the Miami-Dade County School District shall be preserved and maintained and used as natural outdoor laboratories. Tracts of land that are to be developed as future school sites should be landscaped with appropriate xeriscape and/or native plant material. Wherever feasible, upland or wetland revegetation projects should be incorporated into the school's landscape design, and teaching curriculum. Policy CON-8H. Miami-Dade County's tree preservation and landscape requirements shall be coordinated. Tree preservation programs should focus primarily on Natural Forest Communities and specimen tree protection, maintenance, and restoration. The County shall adopt and enforce a comprehensive landscape code and promote xeriscape principles and the planting and protection of trees with an emphasis upon the provision and preservation of canopy and understory for aesthetics, physical comfort, energy savings, economic benefits, and wildlife habitat. Policy CON-8I. The exotic pest plant and nuisance species listed in Chapter 24-49.4 of the County Code, shall not be sold, propagated, or planted within Miami-Dade County. If existing on a development site, they shall be removed prior to development or redevelopment and developed parcels shall be maintained to prevent the growth or accumulation of prohibited species. The County shall update the list from time to time as new scientific information becomes available and the updates shall include category 1 and category 2 species listed by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council if the species have been documented to invade natural areas in south Florida. In addition, any category 1 or category 2 species that are added to the prohibited list shall also be made exempt from requirements to obtain a tree removal permit provided that the removal of such trees in upland areas within the UDB shall require the same amount of canopy mitigation as is currently required. Therefore, the exemption shall be conditioned on meeting this requirement including through a donation to the tree trust fund if applicable. The exotic plant species listed in the County’s adopted Landscape Manual as amended may not be planted within 500 feet of native plant communities. These plant species have been documented by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council, the Miami-Dade County Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces Department's Natural Area's Management Program, and the Miami-Dade County Division of Environmental Resources Management to be invasive pests in natural areas of Miami-Dade County. 861 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-48 Policy CON-8J. Efforts should be made to propagate and reestablish where practical, endangered, threatened, and potentially endangered native plants and animals in Miami-Dade County. (See Appendix A). The current list of state and federally listed plants in Miami-Dade County should be reevaluated and additional species should be proposed for listing and listed animal species should be included, if appropriate. Through its land acquisition and regulatory processes, Miami-Dade County shall continue to protect federally and State-listed plant and animal species to the maximum extent possible. Policy CON-8K. All new plantings on lands owned and managed by Miami-Dade County shall include federally or State listed plants, if appropriate, and other native plant and/or xeriscape plant material, wherever feasible. Policy CON-8L. The 24,560 acres of native habitat at the Training and Transition Airport outside of the security fence shall be managed by the same standards applied to the Big Cypress National Preserve. Policy CON-8M. Miami-Dade County shall seek to increase the percentage of tree canopy from the present level of 10% to the national average of 30% by 2020 through the implementation and/or enforcement of: Adopt-A-Tree and other programs; landscape and tree protection ordinance changes to further increase canopy; and, other mechanisms as feasible and appropriate. Policy CON-8N. Miami-Dade County shall evaluate the feasibility of creating new or enhanced programs to provide technical assistance to private Environmentally Endangered Lands and Natural Forest Communities covenant holders. 862 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-49 Map 14: Acquisition Projects - Environmentally Endangered Lands Program 863 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-50 864 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-51 865 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-52 Land Use Element: Policy LU-3K. By 2017, Miami-Dade County shall determine the feasibility of designating areas in the unincorporated area of the County as Adaptation Action Areas as provided by Section 163.3177(6)(g)(10), Florida Statute, in order to determine those areas vulnerable to coastal storm surge and sea level rise impacts for the purpose of developing policies for adaptation and enhance the funding potential of infrastructure adaptation projects. Policy LU-3L. Miami-Dade County shall work with its local municipalities to identify and designate Adaptation Action Areas as provided by Section 163.3164(1), Florida Statute, in order to develop policies for adaptation and enhance the funding potential for infrastructure projects. NFIP Communities This chart shows the status of our communities participating in the NFIP as of 1/24/2018 per the FEMA Community Status Book Report. The current effective FIRM maps for all communities in our county are dated 09/11/2009. Jurisdiction Initial FIRM Entry Date Additional Comments AVENTURA 7/30/1972 10/22/1997 Adopted the Miami-Dade County (CID 120635) FIRM dated 03/02/1994 Panels 82 and 84. BAL HARBOUR 09/29/1972 09/29/1972 BAY HARBOR ISLANDS 09/29/1972 09/29/1972 BISCAYNE PARK 09/29/1972 09/29/1972 CORAL GABLES 09/29/1972 09/29/1972 CUTLER BAY 03/02/1994 08/31/2006 DORAL 09/30/1972 05/12/2004 Use Miami-Dade County (CID 120635) Panels 75,160 and 170. EL PORTAL 09/29/1972 09/29/1972 FLORIDA CITY 09/29/1972 09/29/1972 GOLDEN BEACH 09/29/1972 09/29/1972 HIALEAH 09/29/1972 09/29/1972 HIALEAH GARDENS 09/29/1972 09/29/1972 HOMESTEAD 09/29/1972 09/29/1972 INDIAN CREEK VILLAGE 09/29/1972 09/29/1972 KEY BISCAYNE 09/29/1972 09/29/1972 MEDLEY 09/29/1972 09/29/1972 MIAMI 09/29/1972 09/29/1972 MIAMI BEACH 09/29/1972 09/29/1972 MIAMI GARDENS 09/30/1972 06/21/2004 Use Miami-Dade County (CID 120635) FIRM panels 80, 82, 83 & 90. MIAMI LAKES 03/02/1994 07/17/2003 Use Miami-Dade County (CID 120635) FIRM panels 75, 80 & 90. MIAMI SHORES 09/29/1972 09/29/1972 MIAMI SPRINGS 09/29/1972 09/29/1972 866 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-53 Jurisdiction Initial FIRM Entry Date Additional Comments NORTH BAY VILLAGE 09/29/1972 09/29/1972 NORTH MIAMI 09/29/1972 09/29/1972 NORTH MIAMI BEACH 09/29/1972 09/29/1972 OPA-LOCKA 09/29/1972 09/29/1972 PALMETTO BAY 03/02/1994 02/02/2005 PINECREST 09/30/1972 10/13/1998 Adopted Miami Dade County (CID 120635) FIRM panels 260, 276 and 278. The initial FIRM date is 10/29/1972 for floodplain management purposes. SOUTH MIAMI 09/29/1972 09/29/1972 SUNNY ISLES BEACH 03/02/1994 09/10/2003 Use Miami Dade County (CID 120635) FIRM panels 82 & 84. The initial FIRM date is 10/29/1972 for floodplain management purposes. SURFSIDE 09/29/1972 09/29/1972 SWEETWATER 07/17/1995 09/29/1972 UNINCORPORATED MIAMI- DADE 07/17/1995 09/29/1972 VIRGINIA GARDENS 07/17/1995 09/29/1972 WEST MIAMI 07/17/1995 09/29/1972 Local communities continue to participate in the NFIP by adopting and enforcing floodplain management ordinances to reduce future flood damage which in turn allows homeowners, renters and business owners in our communities to purchase the federally back flood insurance. To maintain compliance with the NFIP, the municipalities of the Miami-Dade County will do the following: • Accept, review and maintain elevation records for all new construction and substantial improvements in Special Flood Hazard Areas. • Require permits and review all new construction, including substantial improvements, for compliance with the minimum standards under the NFIP and local floodplain management code. • Require that all development proposals greater than 50 lots or 5 acres, whichever is less, include in such proposals base flood elevation data. • Provide that all new construction and substantial improvements in V and VE zones are elevated on pilings and columns so that the bottom of the lowest horizontal structural member of the lowest floor is elevated to at or above the Base Flood Elevation. • Require that all manufactured homes placed in Special Flood Hazard Areas be installed using methods and practices that minimize flood damage, including proper elevation and anchoring to resist flotation, collapse or lateral movement. 867 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-54 Below is a listing of some additional activities that local jurisdictions engage in to continue to promote flood education, preparedness and mitigation. Key Biscayne The Village of Key Biscayne has been a CRS Community since 1998 and is currently a Class 7. The Village has designated the Senior Executive Assistant to the Director of the Building, Zoning and Planning Department as the CRS Coordinator. CRS activities undertaken in the past 5 years include: • Conduct and document drainage system maintenance throughout the community • Conduct drainage system maintenance by inspecting/repair/maintain drainage system • Continue to preserve and maintain our open space and parks system in floodplain • Enforce Floodplain Development Permits • Enforce Floodplain Management Regulations • Enforce stormwater management ordinances • Inform lenders, insurance agents, and real estate offices of our services • Maintain and keep old and current FIRMs • Maintain Elevation Certificates for all new/substantially improved buildings • Continue to track building improvements and repairs through permits • On-going training for staff relative to floodplain management • Prepare/distribute Floodplain Management Plan (LMS) Annual Progress Report • Produce and maintain a log and history of drainage system maintenance provided to residents • Produce/distribute outreach projects to all residents/businesses within the floodplain and all of the Village • Produce/distribute property protection information to Repetitive Loss Areas • Produce/distribute property protection information to Repetitive Loss Properties • Provide copies of Elevation Certificates to residents and/or businesses • Provide flood protection assistance • Provide information on “no dumping” signage throughout the Village. • Provide letters of Flood Insurance Rate Map Determination • Provide property protection assistance to homeowners and/or businesses • Maintain and test flood threat recognition system • Update and maintain the Flood Information on the Village's website Village’s Public Works, Code Enforcement and Building, Zoning and Planning staff members have attended several certification courses with success including the FDEP’s Stormwater Management Inspectors, FSA’s Level 1 and Level 2 Stormwater Certified Operators courses in compliance with annual training requirements. In total the Village has 2 certified SEC inspectors; 3 Level 1 SW Operators and 2 Level 2 SW Operators. 868 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-55 The Village’s current Floodplain Management Ordinance reflects the latest FIRM maps. As of December 2011, the Village had 1,710 flood policies (in 2010, this count was 1,713). Initially the NFIP identified 28 RLPs in 2008 within the Village. A Repetitive Loss Area Analysis was conducted through 2009 to assess and mitigate the losses. The NFIP identified 5 repetitive loss properties (RLPs) within the Village as of December 2012. The last CAV visit was on September 26, 2011, at which time the State identified additional definitions were necessary in the Village’s floodplain management ordinance. The Village Council revised the ordinance to reflect these new definitions in May 2012 and amended again in January 2014. The most recent 5-year Cycle Verification Visit by the FEMA ISO/CRS Specialist was on May 26, 2011 at which time deficiencies were found in the elevation certificates reviewed. This deficiency has since been remediated with assistance from ISO involving Quarterly submittals. Miami Gardens, City of – (CRS Community) Miami Gardens has been a participant in the National Flood Insurance Program since 2006, and joined the Community Rating System in 2008. The city is currently a six in the CRS. The City performs the following activities, but this list is not inclusive of all the NFIP/CRS activities the city conducts. • Maintain Elevation Certificates for New/Substantially Improved Buildings • Provide Flood Zone Information • Inform Lenders, Insurance Agents, and Real Estate Offices of Our Services • Keep Old and Current FIRMs • Maintain Flood Protection Materials at Library • Provide Flood Protection Assistance • Preserve Open Space in Floodplain • Enforce Floodplain Management Regulations • Use/Update Flood Data GIS Information • Produce/Distribute Property Protection Information to Repetitive Loss Areas and the entire community • Prepare a Floodplain Management Plan (LMS) Annual Progress Report • Inspect/Repair/Maintain Drainage Systems • Conduct Drainage System Construction as part of the city CIP • Enforces Dumping Regulations Miami Shores – (CRS Community) Miami Shores entered the NFIP September 29, 1972 and has been a CRS community since October 1, 2000 and is currently a class 8. The village has designated the Planning Director and Building Official as the CRS Coordinator and Floodplain Manager. CRS activities undertaken in the past 5 years include: • Maintain Elevation Certificates for New/Substantially Improved Buildings • Provide Flood Zone Information • Inform Lenders, Insurance Agents, and Real Estate Offices of Our Services • Keep Old and Current FIRMs 869 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-56 • Produce/Distribute Flood News Newsletter • Maintain Flood Protection Materials at Library • Provide Flood Protection Assistance • Preserve Open Space in Floodplain • Enforce Floodplain Management Regulations • Use/Update Flood Data GIS Information • Produce/Distribute Property Protection Information to Repetitive Loss Areas • Prepare Floodplain Management Plan (LMS) Annual Progress Report • Inspect/Repair/Maintain Drainage Systems • Install and Improve Drainage System Portions of CIP • Provide Information on Stream Dumping Regulations North Miami – (CRS Community) North Miami has been a CRS community since October 1, 1994 and is currently maintains a class 5 rating (October 2001). The City has designated the Capital Project Manager as the CRS Coordinator and Floodplain Manager. The City performs the following activities, but this list is not inclusive of all the NFIP/CRS activities the city conducts. • Maintain Elevation Certificates for New/Substantially Improved Buildings • Provide Flood Zone Information • Inform Lenders, Insurance Agents, and Real Estate Offices of Our Services • Keep Old and Current FIRMs • Produce/Distribute an annual Flood Hazard Information Brochure • Maintain Flood Protection Materials at Library • Provide Flood Protection Assistance • Preserve Open Space in Floodplain • Enforce Floodplain Management Regulations • Produce/Distribute Property Protection Information to Repetitive Loss Areas and the entire community • Prepare Floodplain Management Plan (LMS) Annual Progress Report • Inspect/Repair/Maintain Drainage Systems • Perform Drainage System Construction as part of the city’s CIP Provide Information on and enforce Stream Dumping Regulations 870 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-57 Community Rating System (CRS) Communities The CRS is a voluntary program for communities that participate in the NFIP. Participation in the CRS provides residents of those communities with flood insurance discounts. The discounts are based upon the CRS rating of the community from a Class 9 to a Class 1 with a 5% discount for each class obtained. In Miami-Dade we have 23 communities that participate ranging from ratings of Class 5, a 25% discount, to Class 9, a 5% discount, as depicted in Table 9. The LMS supports the CRS communities and others who wish to become CRS communities and strives to help identify areas where uniform credit can be obtained as per compliance with the CRS Coordinators Manual. Table 9: Community Rating System Members* Community Rating Community Rating Unincorporated Miami-Dade 5 City of Miami Beach 6 City of Aventura 7 Miami Shores Village 8 City of Coral Gables 7 City of North Miami Beach 8 City of Doral 7 City of South Miami 7 City of Hialeah 7 City of Sunny Isles Beach 7 City of Homestead 9 Town of Surfside 8 City of Opa Locka 8 City of North Miami 5 Town of Cutler Bay 6 City of Miami Lakes 6 Town of Bay Harbor Islands 7 City of Miami Gardens 6 Village of Bal Harbour 8 Village of Pinecrest 8 Village of Key Biscayne 7 Village of Palmetto Bay 8 City of Miami 7 *As of October 1, 2017 9 The Town of Sweetwater has submitted their letter of interest to join the CRS. 9 Additional Resources, CRS Communities and Their Classes: https://www.fema.gov/national-flood- insurance-program -community-rating-system 871 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-58 Public Information Activities Miami-Dade County maintains information for county residents to help them understand flooding risks: www.miamidade.gov/environment/flood-protection.asp. The site also provides information on elevation certificates, flood insurance, flood zone maps, property sale disclosure, how to protect your property and stormwater utility information. Information on the current flood zone a property is in can be obtained online through the county website at gisweb.miamidade.gov/floodzone/. Once an address is entered, it will zoom to the location on the map and display an information panel. Contact information for the municipalities is also provided. A description of the applicable zone can also be found in the legend. 872 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-59 Emergency Planning Information Residents can access the Miami-Dade County Community Services website at: gisweb.miamidade.gov/CommunityServices/. By searching an address and clicking on the Emergency Management tab, they will be able determine if their residence is in a storm surge planning zone, and information on the closest evacuation center and evacuation bus pick up point to their location. OEM also maintain a website called Ready South Florida: http://readysouthflorida.org/ Ready South Florida consists of partnership between Miami-Dade, Palm Beach, Broward and Monroe counties to promote a common preparedness message and encourage South Florida community to always be “Ready”. The website contains information and promotional materials. 873 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-60 Social Media Miami-Dade OEM maintains a Facebook and Twitter page where preparedness messages, information on events being monitored, emerging or occurring incidents and insight into the operation of OEM is posted, on a daily basis. Facebook page: www.facebook.com/MiamiDadeCountyEM/ Twitter page: twitter.com/MiamiDadeEM/ 874 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-61 Outreach Activities This section outlines the activities that are performed on an annual basis by the communities within Miami-Dade County. More detailed information and samples may be found in Appendix A of Part 7. Activity Frequency Topics Audience Materials Mailout by RER Annual Flood protection, flood insurance, permit requirement and water resources protection 380,000 households Do You Know your Flood Zone (English and Spanish) Website RER Flood Protection (www.miamidade.gov/ environment/flood- protection.asp) Continuous Elevation Certificates, Flood & Drainage Complaints Form, Elevation Certificates, Repetitive Losses, Flood Insurance, Flood Zone and Flood Risk Maps, Coastal Flooding, Real Estate Agents, Protect Your Property, Building Responsibly, Stormwater Utility, Insurance Agents Do You Know Your Flood Zone (English, Spanish and Haitian Creole) Mailout PWWM Annual (May) Hurricane Preparedness 380,000 households Miami-Dade Hurricane Preparedness Guide Mailout by RER Notification to residents of their home being in area that floods Letter to inform resident of meeting and resources Bring Your Kids to Work Annual Fire Prevention Hurricane Preparedness MDFR Employee Children Ready South Florida brochures Child Preparedness Day OEM, Miami-Dade Public Schools Annual (September) Hurricane Preparedness Storm Surge Evacuation Shelter-In-Place 60 MDPS Children Ready South Florida brochures Mayor’s Hurricane Preparedness Press Conference Annual (May) Hurricane Preparedness Community 2.5 million Press Release Live media broadcast Youth Fair Annual Hurricane Preparedness for children, seniors, marine manuals 820 Ready South Florida brochures / Miami-Dade Hurricane Brochure/ Save Our Swales 875 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-62 Activity Frequency Topics Audience Materials Emergency Evacuation Assistance Call Down Semi- Annually Notification to people who have registered for the Emergency Evacuation & Assistance Program to update records and provide information on hurricane preparedness. 2200 Speak to each registrant/family member to verify their participation in program. Follow-up letter informing registrant of the procedure if they have to evacuate and the supplies they need. MDCPS Turkey Point Information Annual Nuclear Power Plant 109,500 households Turkey Point Brochure Hotel Hurricane Preparedness Annual (May) Hurricane Preparedness 250 Miami-Dade Hurricane Brochure Hurricane Preparedness Events 8 Annually Hurricane Preparedness Storm Surge Supply Kit 400 total Miami-Dade Hurricane Brochure Shelter-In-Place Brochure Ready South Florida Brochures Storm Surge Planning Zone map Severe Weather Awareness Brochure MDFR Venomous Snakes brochure Citizen Corps Public Safety Day Annual Disaster/Emergency Preparedness Storm Surge 180 Miami-Dade Hurricane Brochure Ready South Florida brochures Healthcare Facility Emergency Plan Training Bi-monthly Hurricane Preparedness Nuclear Power Plan Storm Surge Planning Zones 12 people per month Miami-Dade Hurricane Brochure 876 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-63 Activity Frequency Topics Audience Materials Healthcare Facility Plan Review Annual Hazard Zones (FEMA Flood Zone, Storm Surge Planning Zone, Nuclear Power Plant) 1500 Residential Health Care Facilities Letter and guidance for plan development, including personalized information on the hazard zones the facility is in. 2016 Child Preparedness Day Miami-Dade Mayor’s Annual Press Conference 877 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-64 Property Sale Disclosure It is a requirement of the Miami-Dade County Code that any purchase of improved real estate in a Special Flood Hazard or Coastal High Hazard Area (also known as Flood Zones) include a full disclosure to the buyer that the property lies in either of those zones. If the structure is substantially damaged or improved, it may, among other things, be required to be raised to the current required flood elevation. In any contract for the sale of improved real estate located in unincorporated Miami- Dade County, which is in a Special Flood Hazard Area, the seller shall include in the contract or a rider to the contract the following disclosure in not less than ten-point bold face type: "THIS HOME OR STRUCTURE IS LOCATED IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA. IF THIS HOME OR STRUCTURE IS BELOW THE APPLICABLE FLOOD ELEVATION LEVEL AND IS SUBSTANTIALLY DAMAGED OR SUBSTANTIALLY IMPROVED, AS DEFINED IN CHAPTER 11C OF THE METROPOLITAN MIAMI-DADE COUNTY CODE, IT MAY, AMONG OTHER THINGS, BE REQUIRED TO BE RAISED TO THE APPLICABLE FLOOD ELEVATION LEVEL." (Ref: Chapter 11-C of the Code of Miami-Dade County) Flood Protection Information The Miami-Dade Public Library System maintains numerous FEMA documents on hazards at it various branch locations. Residents can do an online search for document, find a local branch that has the documents. http://catalog.mdpls.org/search/searchresults.aspx?ctx=1.1033.0.0.7&type=Default&ter m=FEMA&by=KW&sort=RELEVANCE&limit=TOM=*&query=&page=0&searchid=2 Materials are identified by subject, the assigned branch and type of material. A number of resources are linked on line and could be accessible to residents through a computer search and some materials may be available for check out or may be able to be requested to be delivered to their local library branch. Map 16 shows all of the locations of Miami-Dade Library branches. 878 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-65 879 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-66 Map 15: Miami-Dade County Library Locations 880 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-67 Storm Ready Community Miami-Dade County has been a Storm Ready Community since 2008 and was re-designated again in 2017. Weather-Ready Nation In October 2014, the LMS was named a Weather Ready Nation Ambassador and pledged to continue to build community resilience in the face of increasing vulnerability to extreme weather and water events. The LMSWG members help unify our efforts to improve our readiness, responsiveness and resilience. Alert and Notification As documented in the Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) OEM provides notifications of an event as early as is practical in an effort to provide as much advance warning as possible. For tropical storms or hurricanes notification begins three to five days prior to the anticipated arrival of the storm. Activation of the Emergency Operations Center is done to centralize response and recovery decisions, plans and operational activities. Emergency Support Function (ESF) 14 is responsible for public information and is activated with the EOC to assist with the dissemination to the all media outlets and the public. A copy of the CEMP may be found on line at http://www.miamidade.gov/fire/about- comprehensive-plan.asp. Additional support plans may be available upon request by calling 305-468-5400 or emailing eoc@miamidade.gov. OEM maintains the Emergency Evacuation & Assistance Program which is designed to provide evacuation assistance to persons who may need transportation or a higher level of assistance due to functional or medical needs. As of 2014, there are over 2,200 people on the registry. OEM performs a semi-annual call down to keep database current and determine levels of need for the registrants. OEM also notifies the registrants of an event where evacuation may be needed to coordinate assistance. Residents of Miami-Dade can sign up for emergency alerts at: www.miamidade.gov/alerts Alerts include notifications for transit riders in the event of changes to transit operations, alerts for boaters for hazardous weather and emergency alerts for public safety notifications including weather advisories and evacuation decisions. 881 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-68 Response Operations When an incident threatens or has occurred the OEM may notify stakeholders via an email notification system. OEM staff members update and maintain emergency contact information for over 100 local, state and regional agencies through a notification system called Itrezzo. Additional contact lists are maintained by the Section Chiefs and Bureau Directors of the EOC that are utilized to convey planning, response and recovery information to provide for a coordinated response. When the EOC activates over 70 agencies are present and many more work offsite for coordinated efforts. OEM created an All-Hazards Protective Measures Plan to address potential actions that could be implemented upon determination of time and resources. This plan can be found in Volume III of the CEMP. Below are two decision matrices utilized in the plan for protective measures and restricted entry/repopulation considerations. This plan also include information on the evacuation routes, bus pick up points, host schools for Turkey Point evacuations and mobile home parks. OEM is responsible for planning for storm surge related flooding and designating areas for evacuation as a tropical cyclone is approaching. In 2013, OEM utilized the updated Storm Lake Overland Surge from Hurricanes (SLOSH) data to map out the areas of the county at greatest risk from storm surge, as illustrated in Map 7. OEM also has pre- designated planning zones for the nuclear power plant (Turkey Point). Population estimates and clearance times are designated for the storm surge and Turkey Point planning zones in the All-Hazards Protective Measures Plan. 882 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-69 883 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-70 884 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-71 Community Information and Reporting Miami-Dade County operates a County 3-1-1 information system that can be used to provide information to residents and a conduit for reporting community problems such as flooding http://miamidade.gov/wps/portal/Main/reportproblems. County residents can report concerns with flooding, clogged drains and canal issues and request information on any hazard event that may be impending or occurring. 885 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-72 Appendix A: Public Information Brochure 1: Do You Know Your Flood Zone? Online: http://www.miamidade.gov/publicworks/library/brochures/flood-zones.pdf Available in English, Spanish and Haitian Creole 886 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-73 Brochure 2: Save Our Swales Online: http://www.miamidade.gov/publicworks/library/brochures/save-our-swales- english.pdf Available in English, Spanish and Haitian Creole 887 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-74 Brochure 3: 2017 Hurricane Guide Online: www.miamidade.gov/hurricane/library/guide-to-hurricane-readiness.pdf 888 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-75 Brochure 4: Turkey Point Mailout (Excerpt) Online: www.fpl.com/clean-energy/pdf/turkey-point-safety-planning.pdf 889 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-76 Exhibit 1: News Releases http://www.miamidade.gov/releases/2017-05-31-mayor-hurricane-preparedness.asp 890 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-77 http://www.miamidade.gov/fire/releases/2017-09-04-prepare-for-storm-season.asp 891 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-78 Exhibit 2: Emergency and Evacuation Assistance Program Online: http://www.miamidade.gov/fire/eeap.asp 892 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-79 Exhibit 3: Southeast Florida Climate Leadership Summit http://www.southeastfloridaclimatecompact.org/2017-9th-annual-summit/ 893 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-80 Exhibit 4: Residential Healthcare Facility Requirements Online: http://www.miamidade.gov/fire/healthcare-facility-requirements.asp 894 The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy Part 7: Flooding- NFIP and CRS January 2017 P7-81 Exhibit 5: Residential Healthcare Facility Annual Mailout 895