The URL can be used to link to this page

6835 SW 67 ST_EB-09-019 Part 1 City of South Miami PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FEES DATE: O 3 - OS 9 CHECK NO: bo 3 NAME: cS1.1 1��L 1=51'AZ F- ,Lt-C ADDRESS: 5b 3-7 S-T. PHONE NO: IL-4 P4— .Qq rL 3 IA C,. 03.41.300 ERPB HEARING FEES goo .� (Total) Applications for new construction in the RS and RT zoning districts Single unit ($750) All other applications for: New construction($900);Renovation($450); Signs,fences,walls,etc. ($225) For each additional appearance before the Board($150) VARIANCE 02.19.161 Advertisement and Notice Fees ............................($1500) 03.41.200 Admin Fee.......................................................($1500) (TOTAL$3000) EACH ADDITIONAL VARIANCE............................($1125) SPECIAL USE/SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 02.19.161 Advertisement and Notice Fees............................($1500) 03.41.200 Admin Fee.......................................................($1500) (TOTAL$3000) 02.19.161 REZONING APPLICATION (less than 10 acres).........($6000) 02.19.161 REZONING APPLICATION (more than 10 acres).....($20,250) LDC TEXT AMENDMENT I(General standards,misc..provisions) 02.19.161 Advertisement and Notice Fees................................. ($1500) 03.41.200 Admin Fee............... .......................................... ($1500) (TOTAL$3000) LDC TEXT AMENDMENT II(Change Permitted use Schedule) 02.19.161 Advertisement and Notice Fees................................. ($4,500) 03.41.200 Admin Fee............... .......................................... ($1,500) TOTAL($6000) 02.19.161 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMEND AD FEE......... ($22,500) 03.41.200 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADMIN FEE..................($7,500) (Total$30,000) 02.19.161 PUD/MAJOR CHANGE LEGAL ADS($1,575) 03.41.200 PUD/MAJOR CHANGE ADMIN FEE($3,675) (Total $5,250) 03.41.200 PUD MINOR CHANGE ADMIN FEE($1,500) 03.41.200 WAIVER-OF-PLAT APPLICATION ($4,500) TOTAL XAForms\RECEIPT FORM Part I(10-8-08).doc Ordinance No.44-08-1979,adopted 10-7-08 White copy to Planning;Pink copy to Customer; Yellow copy to Finance South Miami F l o r i d a PLANNING&ZONING DEPARTMENT R.<<-� 6130 SUNSET DRIVE Y. {; rr -R �� pU•America City SOUTH MIAMI,FL 33143 TEL: 305-663-6326 FAX: 305-668-7356 'ti y'l:`..•�._.-✓''f _h' 2001 July 21, 2009 Re: Environmental Review & Preservation Board Applicant: Ramon Pacheco Project: New Construction: Final Address: 6835 SW 67 Street ERPB No.: 09-019 Meeting Date: July 21, 2009 Dear Mr. Pacheco, The intent of this correspondence is to inform you that the City of South Miami Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB) has granted final approval of your application with conditions. However, the landscape plan must be submitted as a separate application to the ERPB for approval. The next step in the plan review process is to submit an application for building permit. Please contact the Building Department at (305) 663-6358. The final approval from the ERPB shall lapse after six (6)months if no permit is applied for. This requirement can be found in Section 20-5.11(L), entitled Expiration, Land Development Code. Please be advised that an appeal of an ERPB decision or recommendation may be filed with the City Clerk at any time before a building permit is issued. Appeals may be submitted by the applicant, interested citizens, or the city administration [Section 20-6.2 (A), City Land Development Code]. If you have any questions regarding this application, please contact Mrs. Lourdes Cabrera-Hernandez at the Planning and Zoning Department, between the ,hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday at 305-663-6347. Sincerely, omas J. Vagelin , Director Planning and Zoning Department Y:\ERPB\ERPB Letters\2009 LettersVuly 21,2009\ERPB FINAL WITH CONDITIONS09-019.doc Mr. Trautman questioned if the applicant could briefly explain the materials being proposed and their locations. The applicant responded that the change consists of sliding the wall roughly a foot or two and sliding the secondary wall upward toward the north side by another four or five feet. He commented that the architectural design is still the same as,previously proposed and to use a standing seam metal roof. The applicant then stated that he is going to relocate the entrance of the building so that it faces Sunset Drive. Under a separate permit, black canvas canopies, which would decoratively play off the design of the roof is being suggested to be used. The frame work of the glazing and existing fence should be painted to match the roof as well. In addition, the cobblestone is intended for a fountain that would be placed north of the entrance with the exterior color being white. The applicant commented that-nothing has changed, but the relocation of the walls. Motion: Mr. Chandler moved to approve the application as presented. Mr. Jude seconded. Vote: 6 Approved 0 Opposed 2) [ERPB-09-019] Applicant: Ramon Pacheco Location: 6835 SW 67 Street Request : New Construction: Final Applicants Present: Mr. Ramon Pacheco Mrs. Cabrera-Hernandez read the item into the record. Mr. Trautman questioned if the item was being reviewed for final approval. Mrs. Cabrera-Hernandez responded yes. Mr. Jude questioned if final approval could be given without the landscaping plans. Mrs. Cabrera- Hernandez replied that the report was separated to allow the applicant more time to complete the landscape plan. Mr. Trautman questioned if the separation of a report has been done before. Mrs. Cabrera-Hernandez responded that not typically, but yes. The applicant commented that the reason why the landscaping is not completed is because the landscape architect has been waiting for the arborist comments. He further commented that the landscaping has not changed from what was previously approved. Mr. Bedell questioned if during the preliminary review the landscape plans were attached. The applicant responded yes and could be viewed in the minutes for February 17, 2009. Mr. Lightfoot commented that the Landscape Tree Removal Permit has been completed and the applicant could pass by after the meeting to receive the comments. The applicant commented that as of this moment there is a row of Oak trees that are going to be preserved at the edge of the property and will include more plantings. Mr.. Trautman questioned if the applicant could give a description on the sustainable design principles. The applicant replied that the main paver is designed for percolation, glass that will help with the sun ERPB Mins 07-21-2009 Pg2of6 f r penetration, and high energy efficiency units to recycle energy. He commented that they are looking for more resources to have to contribute to an energy efficient house. Mr. Trautman commented that during the introduction it was stated by a letter that solar panels would be placed on the house. The applicant replied that the solar panels were removed due to issues with the parapet and cost. Mr. Trautman suggested rethinking the use of solar panels since there are tax credits and-rebates for anyone who installs them. Tax incentives are given to lower energy bill. The applicant commented that they are still looking into more energy saving resources. Mr. Chandler questioned the air conditioning seer level and the notes of the glass low "e" safety impact glass. Mr. Chandler questioned if the AC was a high quality unit. Mr. Trautman commented that it should be seen in the mechanical plans; in M-3, in the split AC unit section. Mr. Trautman suggested that the applicant make sure that the previously mentioned glazing is a double glazing. The pavers that are chosen include a reflective index above twenty-nine. When the landscaping is looked at, the main thing objective will be to bring the heat level of the house down. Mr. Jude commented that the landscaping will be looked at quite seriously and understands the challenges that the applicant has had with having the arborist come out to his location. Motion: Mr. Trautman moved and Mr. Balli seconded to approve the application with the conditions that the landscaping will be submitted at a later date. The Board will review the landscaping in great measure and will be used to mitigate the environmental impact on the house. Vote: 4 Approved 2 Opposed (Mr. Bedell and Mr. Chandler) 3) [ERPB-09-016] Applicant: Norberto Cardenas For: Maria Currier& Richard Lopez Location: 5811 SW 88 Street Request : New Construction: Final Applicants Present: Mr.Norberto Cardenas Mrs. Cabrera-Hernandez read the item into the record. No discussion. Motion: Mr. Trautman moved to grant final approval as presented. Mr. Bedell seconded. Vote: 6 Approved 0 Opposed Mr. Trautman recused himself from the Chambers. ERPB Mins 07-21-2009 Pg 3 of 6 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW & PRESERVATION BOARD To: Chair & Members . Date: July 21, 2009 Environmental Review & Preservation Board Tuesday 8:30 a. Via: Thomas J. Vageline, Director Re: ERPB-09-019 Planning and Zoning Departmeto Second Review From: Lourdes Cabrera-Hernpndez, LEED AP Request: New Construct n Principal Planner [6 (Final) ERPB Applicant:............................... Ramon Pacheco Property Owner:............................... CSM Real Estate LLC Folio Numbers:........................................09-4026-008-0060 Property Address:.............................6835 SW 67 Street, South Miami, FL 33143 Zoning District:................................ "RS-1" Estate Residential Adjacent Zoning:...............................RS-1 (North, South, East and West) Current Use:.....................................Vacant Land Flood Zone:....................................... "AE" (EL 6) Applicant's Request: The applicant is requesting final approval from the Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB) for the new construction of the proposed two-story building, located at the above referenced location. Background & Proiect Status: On February 17, 2009, the application's first appearance. before the Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB) was approved for preliminary as presented. The ERPB complimented the applicant on the design of the residence. At this time, the newly proposed architectural plans and the engineering plans have been included for final review and approval from the Board. Attached ERPB . excerpt minutes from February 17, 2009, application received preliminary approval. It is staff's observation that the submitted plans denote on the cover sheet the drawing index, Landscape: L-1, L-2 and L-3. However, landscape plans are not included on the set of plans submitted for final review_ and approval from the ERPB. Therefore, landscaping is not a part of the review and will require a separate submittal to the ERPB. The subject property first appeared before the Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB), as item ERPB-08-061, on August 19, 2008, as a new construction but a different building design. Therefore, the Planning and Zoning staff has filed the design under a different ERPB application number, ERPB-09-019. Property Survey: Boundary Survey prepared by registered land surveyor for the state of Florida, Adis N. Nunez_ of Blanco Surveyors, Inc., dated April 4, 2008. Subject property survey was last revised on August 4, 2008, for trees and elevations. Legal Description: The west 161 feet of Track 6 of "Nelson Homesites" subdivision, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 39 at Page 57 of the Public -Records Miami-Dade County, Florida. 6835 SW 67 Street ERPB-09-019 presented on July 21, 2009 New Construction: Final Page 2 of 4 .Zoning District: "RS-1" Estate Residential District: The purpose of this district is to provide for estate type.single-family residential development located in a spacious rural- like setting which emphasizes the preservation of open space. This district is appropriate in areas designated "Single-Family" on the city's adopted Comprehensive Plan. Existing Conditions: The boundary survey indicates the subject property as a vacant lot. The property fronts SW 67" Street with a lot frontage of 161 feet in width, exceeding the 125 feet minimum lot frontage requirements set forth in the RS-1 zoning district. The property consists of side lengths of 304.10 feet and 304.44 feet, with a total lot size of 48,977 square feet net area, exceeding the 40,000 square feet minimum lot size net area set forth in the RS-1 zoning district, Section 20-3.5(E), Land Development Code. The photographs on file of the subject and surrounding properties illustrate the open space character of the neighborhood. Site Plan Analysis: It is important to note the curb cut widths exceed the twenty feet maximum as commented by Public Works at the Development Review Committee. Currently, both driveway accesses are shown at 18'-0" feet in width, exceeding the allowable as per Miami-Dade County Public Works Manual. The proposed site plan depicts a one-story, u-shaped residence, which consists of linear spaces with cross ventilation, metal and flat roofs. The rear yard consists of a swimming pool, spa and deck bordering the nearly ninety feet long pool, which is surrounded by sod. The front yard consists of a centered fountain between the pervious driveway access lanes, and the drain field and septic tanks. The property consists of a brushed aluminum picket*fence and a smooth stucco finish privacy wall. Applicant must meet the requirements of the storm water ordinance. The intent of the Ordinance is to require all properties to retain stormwater on site "as to prevent the development from contributing or causing recurrent ponding to adjoining properties or public rights-of-way." The building dimensional requirements are guided by Section 20-3.5(E) and the RS-1 zoning district, of the Land Development Code. The calculations on the proposed site plan are titled zoning regulation for the City of South Miami RS-1, and the proposed total net site area is 48,977 square feet, which.exceeds the minimum net lot total area (40,000 square feet), required by the Land Development Code. The proposed building coverage of 9,795 square feet, does not exceed the maximum building coverage (9,795 square feet or 20%) allowed by the Land Development Code. The proposed front setback of 111'-0" feet, exceeds the 50'-0" feet minimum front setback required. The proposed rear setback of 55'-0" feet, exceeds the 25'-0" feet minimum rear setback. The side interior setback shall be a minimum of 12'-6". Furthermore, the cumulative width of both side yards shall not be less than twenty percent (20%) of the total lot width. The proposed cumulative width minimum interior side setback shall be no less than 20 percent (32.2 feet or 32'-3") of the total lot width (161 linear feet of lot frontage). The proposed interior side setback (east) of 12'-6" 6835 SW 67 Street ERPB-09-019 presented on July 21, 2009 New Construction: Final Page 3 of 4 (minimum side setback) and the proposed interior side setback (west) of 25-0", total 37.5 feet or 37'-6", exceeds the 32'3" minimum cumulative required. The subject property is a narrow and deep lot in configuration. Providing greater setbacks than the minimum required has allowed the proposal of additional green area and open spaces for the front and rear yards. The proposed impervious coverage includes the proposed one-story building, swimming pool and deck area, pond, and other impervious surfaces such as concrete pads that accommodate the mechanical equipment. The proposed driveway is not included in the maximum impervious coverage summation because it is noted to be a pervious surface. The calculation provided for impervious coverage (13,463 square feet) does not exceed the 30% maximum impervious coverage allowed (14,693 square feet or 30%) by the Land Development Code. Elevations: The building height dimensions, building finishes and materials are noted on the elevations. The front fagade, the south elevation, illustrates symmetry at the front entrance to the one-story contemporary high ceiling building. For additional balance and harmony to the fagade, light and dark color smooth stucco integrated with brushed aluminum windows compliment the articulation and rhythm to the fagades. A modern architectural roof design which consist of a standing seam metal roof deck that creates a skyline with plenty of articulation. Architect has submitted windows and doors brochure. Sustainable Design: The U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) has created Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), which emphasizes energy preservation. LEED recognizes and promotes green building by offering project certification. In architecture a good sustainable design is a building that has achieved a certain level of esthetics and incorporates a new, more environmentally sensitive approach to architectural design. The design of the proposed single-family residence includes the use of solar panels on the roof, Brise Soleil for solar shading, double glazing impact windows, water and energy efficiency. The Letter of Intent prepared by Mr. Ramon Pacheco, AIA registered architect, highlights sustainable design principles and practices. Development Review Committee: On August 12, 2008 the committee met to review the subject property. Public Works Department commented that driveway curb cuts are not to exceed twenty feet, as per the Miami-Dade County Public Works manual. Currently, the Public Works comments have not been incorporated. The newly proposed driveway curb cuts illustrated exceed twenty feet in width. Landscaping Plan: Currently, a landscape plan has not been submitted as a part of this ERPB final review. Therefore, a separate submittal to the ERPB for final approval of the landscape will be required. It is staff's observation that the submitted plans denote on the cover sheet the drawing index, Landscape: L-1, L-2 and L-3. However, landscape plans are not attached for review. 6835 SW 67 Street ERPB-09-019 presented on July 21, 2009 New Construction: Final Page 4 of 4 Recommendation: Final Approval with the following conditions: 1. Meet requirements as set forth in the Adopted Stormwater Ordinance No. 06- 07-1907; 2. Meet the Public Works Department comment that driveway curb cuts are not to exceed twenty feet, as per Miami-Dade County Public Works manual; 3. Address identification sign not to exceed one-square foot; 4. Landscape approval will require a separate submittal to the ERPB; and, 5. Any comments and/or suggestions from the Board. Attachments: Planning and Zoning Department letter,dated March 17,2009 Miami-Dade Property Appraiser's Information ERPB excerpt minutes, dated March 17,2009(preliminary approval) Architectural plans prepared by Ramon Pacheco,Architect and Planner: ■ Cover Page&Index, Sheet A-0 • Site plan, Sheet A-1 ■ First Floor Plan, Sheet A-2 ■ Roof Plan, Sheet A-3 • Elevations, Sheet A-4 • Building Cross Section"A","B", "C", "D", Sheet A-5 ■ Building Cross Section"E°,"F","G",&"H", Sheet A-6 ■ Building Cross Section"I", "J","K","L", Sheet A-7 ■ Room Finish: Door and Window Schedules, Sheet A-8 ■ Wall Sections, Sheet A-9 ■ Wall Sections, Sheet A-10 ■ Wall Sections, Sheet A-11 ■ Wall Sections and Architectural Details, Sheet A-12 ■ Architectural Details, Sheet A-13 Structural Plans, Sheot S-1 thru S-9 Electrical Plans, Sheet E-1, E-2, E-2.1, E-3, and E-4 Mechanical Plans, Sheet M-1 thru M-3 Plumbing Plans, Sheet P-1 thru P-5 On file: • ERPB Application,dated February 26,2009008 • Professional Preparer's Statement of Landscaping Compliance • LDC Section 20-3.1 and Section 20-3.5E • Transmittal letter, dated August 12,2008 - • Letter from Ramon Pacheco,dated August 12, 2008 • Storm Ordinance Application No. 06-07-1907 • Storm Ordinance No.06-07-1907 • Property Survey, dated April 8,2008 • Architectural plans prepared by Ramon Pacheco,Architect and Planner: ■ Photographs: Subject and Abutting Properties ■ Site plan and Zoning Regulation ■ Floor plan ■ Elevations: Front, Rear, and Sides(east and west) ■ Elevations: Interior Yard (east and west) ■ Colored Site plan, Elevations and Rendering ■ Colored Perspectives: Exterior • Colored Perspectives: Exterior and Interior • Preliminary Existing Tree Disposition Plan • Preliminary Planting Plan LCH Z:\ERPB\ERPB Agendas\2009 ERPB AGENDAS\July 21,2009\ERPB-09-019F.doc South Miami fr `� PLANNING&ZONING DEPT. F' ° r ° a 'b 6130 SUNSET DRIVE Dui-am®nca ON — SOUTH MIAMI;FL 33143 TEL: 305-663-6326 FAX:305-668-7356 ° 2001 March 17, 2009 Re: Environmental Review & Preservation Board—Preliminary Approval Applicant: Ramon Pacheco Project: New Construction: Preliminary Address: 6835 SW 67 Street ERPB No.: 09-019 Meeting Date: March 17, 2009. Dear Mr. Pacheco, The intent of this correspondence is to inform you that the City of South Miami Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB) has preliminarily approved your application with conditions: You are required to appear before the ERPB for a final approval. In order to process your application, you are required to re-submit fourteen (14) sets of plans and/or documentation to the Planning Department. The next deadline for re-submittal is March 19, 2009, for the ERPB meet held on April 7, 2009. If you fail to meet the deadline requirements, your application will be assigned to the next regularly scheduled meeting. The ERPB will either grant final approval of your application with conditions or they can request additional modifications. If you have any further questions regarding this application, please contact Mrs. Lourdes , Cabrera- Hernandez at the Planning Department, between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday at 305-663-6347.. Sincerely, Thomas J. Vageline Planning Director Planning Department Y:\ERPB\ERPB Letters\2009 Letters\ERPB PRELIMINARY APPROVAL09-019.doe SouT9 04 �r .4 U -• INCORPORATED 1927 toRto CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW & PRESERVATION BOARD REGULAR MEETING MINUTES Excerpt Minutes Tuesday,March 17,2009 8:30 AM I. CALL TO ORDER Action: Mr. Trautman(Chair), called the meeting to order at 8:30 A.M. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Action: The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison. III. ROLL CALL Action: Mr. Trautman performed roll call. Board members present constituting a quorum: Mr. Trautman, Mrs. Mark, Mr. Jude, Mr. Balli, Mr. Rivera and Mr. Chandler. Board members.absent: Mr. Fernandez, Mrs. Morales- Fernandez and Mr. Bedell. City Staff present: Mr. Thomas J. Vageline (Planning Director), Mrs. Lourdes Cabrera- Hernandez (Principal Planner), Mr. Marcus Lightfoot (Permit Facilitator) and Ms. Alerik Barrios (Assistant) Staff absent: None IV.REQUESTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1) [ERPB-09-019] Applicant: Ramon Pacheco Location: 6835 SW 67 Street Request: New Construction: Preliminary Applicants Present: Mr. Pacheco. Mrs. Cabrera-Hernandez read the item into the record. Mrs. Mark questioned if the generator requires a different permit. Mrs. Cabrera-Hernandez replied yes,that's standard procedure. Mr. Chandler questioned what was previously in the back of the house. Mrs. Cabrera-Hernandez replied that,staff has the previous file to answer those questions. ERPB Mins 02-17-2009 Pg 1 of 2 Mr. Trautman questioned if,the applicant has any pictures or illustration of the abutting properties or across the street. Mrs. Cabrera-Hernandez replied that it is.part of the package on "page 2". Mr. Rivera questioned if there were any major differences between the project and the previous application. The applicant responded that it is the same style, but the east side changed considerably since it was reduced in size. Mr. Balli complimented the applicant on the design of the residence. He recommended that heavy landscaping be applied along the long corridor by the master bedroom since it faces west toward the sun. The applicant commented that there is going to be heavy. landscaping. Motion: Mr. Chandler moved to approve the application as present. Mr. Trautman seconded. Vote: 6 Approved 0 Opposed V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. Trautman moved to approve the minutes of February 17, 2009 without corrections. Mr. Chandler seconded. Vote: 5 Approved lAbstained (Mr. Balli) REMARKS: Mrs. Cabrera-Hernandez introduced the new Planning Director Mr. Thomas J. Vageline. Mr. Vageline commented that it was his second day, and was just informed there was a meeting and wanted to see how it functions. VII. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business,the meeting was adjourned at approximately 9:17 a.m. An appeal of an ERPB decision or recommendation may be filed at any time before a building permit is issued by filing same with the city clerk upon a form prescribed therefore. Appeals may be taken by the applicant,interested citizens,or the city administration[per§20-6.2(A)of the City's Land Development Code]. If you have any questions concerning this matter,please contact Lourdes Cabrera-Hernandez,of the Planning &Zoning Department,between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM,Monday through Friday,at 305.663.6347. Y:\ERPB\ERPB Minutes\2009 Minutes\ERPB Min March 3,2009.doc ERPB Mins 02-17-2009 Pg 2 of 2 � . South Miami PLANNING&ZONING DEPT. F i ° r i a a 6130 SUNSET DRIVE Nl-America eer i ? SOUTH MIAMI,FL 33143 TEL: 305-663-6326 k'kT..�1 = FAX: 305-668-7356 2001 March 17, 2009 Re: Environmental Review & Preservation Board—Preliminary Approval Applicant: Ramon Pacheco Project: New Construction: Preliminary Address: 6835 SW 67 Street ERPB No.: 09-019 Meeting Date: March 17,2009 Dear Mr. Pacheco, The intent of this correspondence is to inform you that the City of South Miami Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB) has preliminarily approved your application with conditions. You are required to appear before the ERPB for a final approval. In order to process your application, you are required to re-submit fourteen (14) sets of plans and/or documentation to the Planning Department. The next deadline for re-submittal is March 19, 2009, for the ERPB meet held on April 7, 2009. If you fail to meet the deadline requirements, your application will be assigned to the next regularly scheduled meeting. The ERPB will either grant final approval of your application with conditions or they can request additional modifications. If you have any further questions regarding this application, please contact Mrs. Lourdes Cabrera- Hernandez at the Planning Department, between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday at 305-663-6347. Sincerely, Thomas J. Vageline Planning Director Planning Department Y:\ERPB\ERPB Letters\2009 LettersTUB PRELIMINARY APPROVAL09-019.doc 2) [ERPB-09-019] Applicant: Ramon Pacheco Location: 6835 SW 67 Street Request: New Construction: Preliminary Applicants Present: Mr. Pacheco Mrs. Cabrera-Hernandez read the item into the record. Mrs. Mark questioned if the generator requires a different permit. Mrs. Cabrera-Hernandez replied yes,that's standard procedure. Mr. Chandler questioned what was previously in the back of the house. Mrs. Cabrera-Hernandez replied that staff has the previous file to answer those questions. Mr. Trautman questioned if the applicant has any pictures or illustration of the abutting properties or across the street. Mrs. Cabrera-Hernandez replied that it is part of the package on "page 2". Mr. Rivera questioned if there were any major differences between the project and the previous application. The applicant responded that it is the same style, but the east side changed considerably since it was reduced in size. Mr. Balli complimented the applicant on the design of the residence. He recommended that heavy landscaping be applied along the long corridor by the master bedroom since it faces west toward the sun. The applicant commented that there is going to be heavy landscaping. Motion: Mr. Chandler moved to approve the application as present. Mr. Trautman seconded. Vote: 6 Approved 0 Opposed 3) [ERPB-09-020] Applicant: Javier Hermida Location: 6621 SW 64 Avenue Request: New Construction: Revision Applicants Present: Mr. Hermida Mr. Lightfoot read the item into the record. Mr. Trautman questioned if in between the driveway and the parkway there is grass. He then questioned if the applicant envisions the driveway connecting to the street. The applicant responded yes,he envisions the driveway going all the way to the street. Mr. Trautman questioned what material is being used for the drive way. The applicant responded brick pavers. He then questioned.how many trees were missing. Mr. Lightfoot replied that the applicant reduced it from the originally approved five trees to two trees. Mr. Chandler commented that he would like to see the trees come back since it seems to be set up to be more parking. The applicant commented that he did not place the tree since he was worried it would cover the house. Mr. Chandler then recommended that he would like to see a balance between an ERPB Mins 02-17-2009 Pg 2 of 6 t o CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI Excellence, Integrity, Inclusion ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& PRESERVATION BOARD To: Chair& Members, Environmental Date: March 17, 2009 Review& Preservation Board Tuesday 8.30 a.m. n Via: Sanford A. Youkilis,AICP Acting Planning Director From: Lourdes Cabrera-Hern ndez, LEED AP Re: ERPB-09-019 Principal Planner Applicant: Mr. Ramon Pacheco &Associates for: Melgoza Residence Location: 6835 SW 67 Street, South Miami Request: NEW CONSTRUCTION: Preliminary Property Survey: Boundary Survey prepared by registered land surveyor for the state of Florida, Adis N. Nunez of Blanco Surveyors, Inc., dated April 4, 2008. Subject property survey was last revised on August 4, 2008, for trees and elevations. Legal Description: The west 161 feet of Track 6 of "Nelson Homesites" subdivision, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 39 at Page .57 of the Public Records Miami-Dade County, Florida. Zoning District: "RS-1" Estate Residential District: The purpose of this district is to provide for estate type single-family residential development located in a spacious rural- like setting which emphasizes the preservation of open space. This district is appropriate in areas designated "Single-Family" on the city's adopted Comprehensive Plan. Existing Conditions: The boundary survey indicates the subject property as a vacant lot. The property fronts SW 67th Street with a lot frontage of 161 feet in width, which exceeds the 125 feet minimum lot frontage requirements set forth in the RS-1 zoning district. The property consists of side lengths of 304.10 feet and 304.44 feet, with a total lot size of 48,977 square feet net area, which exceeds the 40,000 square feet minimum lot size net area set forth in the RS-1 zoning- district, Section 20-3.5(E), Land Development Code. The attached photographs of the subject and surrounding properties illustrate the open space and character of the neighborhood._ . Site Plan Analysis: The proposed site plan depicts a one-story, u-shaped residence, which consists of linear spaces with cross ventilation, a swimming pool and pervious driveway access. Applicant must meet the requirements of the storm water ordinance. The intent of the ordinance is to "require all properties to retain storm water drainage on site as to prevent development that would result in contributing to or causing recurrent ponding on adjoining properties or public right-of-way." The building dimensional requirements are guided by Section 20-3.5(E) and the RS-1 zoning district, of the Land Development Code. The calculations on the proposed site plan are titled zoning regulation for the City of South Miami RS-1, and the proposed total net site area is 48,977 square feet, which exceeds the minimum net lot total area. (40,000 square feet), required by the Land Development Code. The proposed building 6835 SW 67 Street ERPB-09- 019 presented on March 17, 2009 New Construction: Residential Page 2of3 - coverage 9,795 square feet or 20% of the maximum building coverage, does not exceed the maximum building coverage (9,795 square feet or 20%) allowed by the Land Development Code. The proposed front setback of 111'-0" feet, exceed the 50'-0 feet minimum front setback required. The proposed rear setback of 55'-0" feet, exceed the 25'-0" feet minimum rear setback. The side interior setback shall be a minimum of 12'-6". Furthermore, the cumulative width of both side yards shall not be less than twenty percent (20%) of the total lot width. The proposed cumulative width minimum interior side setback shall be no less than 20 percent (32.2 feet or 32'-3") of the total lot width (161 linear feet of lot frontage). The proposed'interior side setback (east) of 12'-6" (minimum side setback) and the proposed interior side setback (west) of 25-0", total 37.5 feet or 37'-6", exceeds the 32'3" minimum cumulative required. The subject property is a narrow and deep lot in configuration and providing greater setbacks than the minimum required has allowed the proposal of additional green area and open spaces on the front and rear yards. The proposed impervious coverage includes the proposed one-story building, swimming pool and deck area, pond, and other impervious surfaces as concrete pads that accommodate the mechanical equipment. The proposed driveway is not included in the maximum impervious coverage summation because it is noted to be a pervious surface. The calculation provided for impervious coverage (13,463 square feet) does not exceed the 30% maximum impervious coverage allowed (14,683 square feet or 30%) by the Land Development Code. Elevations: The building height dimensions, building finishes and materials are noted on the elevations. The front fagade, the south elevation, illustrates symmetry at the front entrance to the one-story contemporary high ceiling building. For additional balance and harmony to the fagade, light and dark color smooth stucco integrated with brushed aluminum windows compliment the articulation and rhythm to the-facades. A modern architectural roof design which consist of standing seam metal roof deck that create a skyline with plenty of articulation. Architect has submitted windows and doors brochure. Sustainable Design: The U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) has created Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), which emphasizes energy preservation. LEED recognizes and promotes green building by offering project certification. In architecture a good sustainable design is a building that has achieved a certain level of esthetics and incorporates a new, more environmentally sensitive approach to architectural design. The design of the proposed single-family residences includes the use of solar panels on the roof, Brise Soleil for solar shading, double glazing impact windows, water and energy efficiency. The Letter of Intent prepared by Mr. Ramon Pacheco, AIA registered architect, highlights sustainable design principles and practices. a 6835 SW 67 Street - - ERPB-09- 019 presented on March 17, 2009 New Construction: Residential Page 3 of 3 Development Review Committee: On August 12, 2008 (Tuesday) the committee met to review the subject property. Public Works Department commented that driveway curb cuts are not to exceed twenty feet, as per Miami-Dade County Public Works manual. Landscaping Plan: Currently, a revised tree removal permit is pending, consistent with the existing site conditions. The landscape plan shall be consistent with the requirements set forth in Section 20-4.5, Land Development Code. The Plan includes a detailed description of the landscaping schedule, including tree names and pertinent information. The number of existing trees that will be protected, existing trees to be removed, and trees to be added as part of the proposed project can be found on the proposed Landscape Plan as well. Pursuant to Section 20-4.5(D)(5)(b) of the Land Development Code, the minimum number.or trees required for the-RS-1, zoning district are nine (9) trees per acre of net lot area. A proposed landscape plan and a professional preparer's statement of landscaping compliance is attached. RECOMMENDATION: Preliminary Approval with the following conditions: 1. Meet requirements as set forth in the Adopted Stormwater Ordinance No. 06- 07-1907; 2. Meet the requirements as set forth in the Tree Removal Permit Application, and comply with the Tree Removal Permit Relocation Standards, Section 20-4.5k of the Land Development Code; 3. Driveway curb cuts not to exceed twenty feet in width; 4. Submit the grading and irrigation plan prior to final ERPB; 5. Submit the engineering plans prior to final ERPB; and 6. Provide exterior paint colors and material samples; and 7. Pursuant to Sec. 20-3.6(J)(1-4) Pool enclosures are required for the swimming pool. The property requires a barrier; and, 8. Any comments and/or suggestions from the Board. - - - Attachments: • ERPB Application,dated February 26, 2009008 • Professional Preparer's Statement of Landscaping Compliance • LDC Section 20-3.1 and Section 20-3.5E • Transmittal letter, dated August 12, 2008 • Letter from Ramon Pacheco,dated August 12, 2008 • Storm Ordinance Application No. 06-07-1907 • Storm Ordinance No. 06-07-1907 • Property Survey, dated April 8, 2008 • Architectural plans prepared by Ramon Pacheco,Architect and Planner: ■ Photographs: Subject and Abutting Properties ■ Site plan and Zoning Regulation ■ Floor plan ■ Elevations: Front, Rear, and Sides (east and west) ■ Elevations: Interior Yard (east and west) ■ Colored Site plan, Elevations and Rendering ■ Colored Perspectives: Exterior ■ Colored Perspectives: Exterior and Interior ■ Preliminary Existing Tree Disposition Plan ■ Preliminary Planting Plan LCH Z:\ERPB\ERPB Agendas\2009 ERPB AGENDAS\March 17,2009\ERPB-09-019.doc PROFESSIONAL PREPARER'S STATEMENT OF LANDSCAPING COMPLIANCE PROCESS NUMBER-___�___��_______ -11t VJ 56 -16i'i= e� 01^ -r RAct G Legal description: Lot --------- Block--------- Subdivision --_N_ 5.�_ _ oMS P.B. 3-1- Page _ �_, Development name: MELGOZA RESIDENCE Located at: 6835 S.W. 67 Street, South Miami, Florida. hereby certify that the landscaping/irrigation plan being submitted for the above captioned complies with the requirements of Ordinance 98-13 (landscaping ordinance) as to species, height, trunk width and location at time of planting, and that the species as shown are in accordance with the accepted species approved by Miami-Dade County and that none of the species are from the prohibited list. Additionally automatic sprinkler system (if applicable) comply with requirement of said ordinance as to type of heads, spray system, location, etc. I further certify that m authorized under Chapter 481, Florida statutes to prepare and submit this landscaping/i tion plan. ----------- ------------ Seal: Professional p ignature Orlando Comas, A.S.L.A. Registered Landscape Architect State License No. 0001565 7105 S.W. 8TH STREET, SUITE 407 MIAMI, FL, 33144 PHONE: 305-264-3841 Email: ocomas @bellsouth.net STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 5th day of August 2008, by Orlando Comas. He is personally known to me and has produced Florida Driver's License No. C520-657-49-201-0, as identification and did not take an oath. Witness my signature and official seal this 5th day of August, 2008, In the County and State aforesaid, the date and year last aforesaid. OtPPblic r A21 Print Name My Commission Expirers: FABIOLAARIAS MY COMMISSION#DD 692998 EXPIRES:August 17,2011 j�Afi kN Bonded Thru Notary Pubfic underwriters ZONING REGULATIONS 20-3.1 ARTICLE III. ZONING REGULATIONS 20-3.1 Zoning use districts and purposes. (A) Zoning Districts Established. In order to implement the intent of this Code and the city's adopted Comprehensive Plan, the City is hereby divided into eighteen (18) zoning use districts with the symbol designations and general purposes listed below and permitted uses set forth in Section 20-3.3(D). A planned unit development (PUD) district is also created in Section 20-3.7. Standards shall be uniform throughout each zoning use district. District symbols and names shall be known as: Symbol Name RS-1 Estate Residential R,S-2 Semi-Estate Residential RS-3 Low Density Single-Family RS-4 Single-Family RS-5 Single-Family(50'lots) RT 6 'lbwnhouse Residential RT 9 Two-Family/Tbwnhouse Residential RM-18 Low Density Multi-Family Residential RM-24 Medium Density Multi-Family Residential RO Residential Office LO Low-Intensity Office MO Medium-Intensity Office NR Neighborhood Retail SR, Specialty Retail GR General Retail TODD Transit-Oriented Development District Hospital PI Public/Institutional PR, Parks and Recreation HP-OV Historic Preservation Overlay ,(B) District Purpose Statements. "RS-1"Estate.Residential District. The purpose of this district is to. provide for estate type single-family residential development located in a spacious rural-like setting which emphasizes the preservation of open space. This district is appropriate in areas designated "Single-Family" on the city's adopted Comprehensive Plan. Supp.No. 9 20-3.5 SOUTH MIAMI,LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (D) Reserved. Section 20-3.5E DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS SINGLE-FAMILY DISTRICTS REQUIREMENT RS-I RS-2 RS-3 R3-4 RS-5 Min.Lot Size Net Area(sq.ft.) 40,000 15,000 10,000 6,000 6,000 Frontage(It.) 125 100 75 60 50 Alin.Yard Setbacks(ft.) Front 50 35 25 25 25 Rear 25 25 25 25 25 Side(Interior)' For struc- 12.5 10 7.5 7.5b 7.5b ture 12'or less in height,as mea- sured I from the first floor finished floor ele- vation f Portion of 25 20 15` 10` 7.5 I structure above 12' li high as mea- sured from the first floor j finished floor ele- vation Side(Street) 20 15 15 15 15 Max.Building Height Stories 2 2 2 2 2 Feet 25 25 25 25 25 Max.Building Coverage(%) First floor 20 30 30 30 30 Second 60 60 60 60 60 floor:% of the first floor I . Max.Impervious Coverage(40) 30 40 40 .45 45 R Cumulative width of both side yards shall be not less than 20 percent of total lot width. b Except that additions to existing structures may have 5 feet interior side setbacks where any portion of the building already has a 5 feet setback. c For pre-existing improved lots of record in the RS3 or RS4 districts,that are 50 feet or less in lot width, the second floor setback shall be the same as the first floor setback. Supp.No.8 50' From:Ramon Pacheco & Associates, IN 3056662573 08/12/2008 14:48 #836 P.001/002 RAMON PACHECO 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. architect & planner 4990 s.w. 72nd avenue, suite 101, miami, Horida 33155 telephone (305)666-2573 fox (305)666-3871 F"acs-imi le—Transmittal To: Lourdes Cabrera-Hernandez From: Ramon Pacheco Fax: (305) 668-7356 Pages : 2 (Including fax sheet) Phone : (305) 663-6347 Date : August 12, 2008 Re : 6835 SW 67 ST CC : Mrs. Cabrera-Hernandez, Please find attached the fetter for the Melgoza residence,located at 6835 SW 67 ST as requested. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience. Thank you, Ramon Pacheco Please call to confirm that all pages were received. Should you have any questions our phone number is(3 05)666-2573. Thank You From:Ramon Pacheco & Associates, IN 3056662573 08/12/2008 14:49 #836 P.002/002 RAMON PACWO&ASSOCIATES, INC. architect & planner 4990 s.w. 72nd avenue, sulee 101, miami, 8orida 33155 Wephone (305)665-2573 F= (305)666.3871 August 12, 2008 South Miami Planning Department 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, FL 33143 Re: Melgoza Residence 6835 SW 67 Street South Miami, Florida 33143 Mrs. Lourdes Cabrera-Hernandez: As per your request,please see below the sustainable issues that we have contemplated: Site Plan related - Pollution prevention during construction Maximum open space - bight pollution reduction Water Efficiency - Landscape with local species to reduce irrigation needs - Storm water collections for irrigation purposes - Water use reduction. Efficient faucets and appliances Energy Efficiency Reduce energy performance(annual energy cost) - Proper use of Day lighting principles - Double glazing impact window system to reduce use of A/C systems. Proper insulation of exposed walls Highest efficiency air conditioning system, appliances, etc. Solar control with use of Brise Soleil and shutters - On site renewable energy to offset energy cost; Solar panels. Materials and Resources - Use of sustainable materials - Local providers, green materials (bamboo floors), recyclable materials Indoor Environmental Quality Increase ventilation Low emitting materials Control Chemical & Pollutant sources Thermal Control Should you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience. 7 Sin e ,� I PM-C, Ramon Pacheco, A.I.A s o U 7, South Miami r H AU-Amedca City INCORPORATED • CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2 o 7V A PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT STORMWATER ORDINANCE 2001 To: Applicants From: Ricardo Soto-Lopez, Planning Director Subject: City of South Miami Stormwater Ordinance # 06-07-1907 —Transmittal Notification In an effort to prevent development that would result in contributing to or causing recurrent ponding on adjoining properties or public rights-of-way, the City of South Miami has adopted the Stormwater Ordinance on March 6, 2007. Therefore, I hereby acknowledge that I am in receipt of the Stormwater Ordinance #06-07-1907. Agreed &Accepted Company Name Address of Development Print Name Date Ricardo Soto-Lopez Date Planning Director YAStormwater Ordinance Transmittals\Stormwater Ordinance Transmittal Letter.doc ORDINANCE NO. 06-07-1907 AN ORDINANCE OF THE IVLkYOR AND CITY COM>\IISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO{ DRAINAGE; AMENDING SECTION 20-4.7 OF THE CITY'S LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE IN ORDER TO CORRECT THE . TITLE. TO REFLECT "MINIIIZUM STANDARDS" FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION AND NOT JUST IDENTIFWNG AW4IMUM HOUSING STANDARDS; MODIFYING SUBSECTION (C) IN ORDER TO SPECIFICALLY REQUIRE ALL .PROPERTIES TO RETAIN STOR,YBVATER DRAINAGE ON SITE SO AS TO PREVENT DEVELOPMENT THAT WOULD RESULT IN CONTRIBUTING TO OR CAUSING RECURRENT PONDING ON ADJOINING PROPERTIES OR PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY; AND ELIMINATING SUBSECTION_ (J) ENTITLED "CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY RELATING TO REHABILITATIONT AREAS AS NO SUCH CERTIFICATE IS USED IN 'IM CITY, AND AS REHABILITATION AREA IS NOT . DEFE\'ED; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT,AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami desire to promote, protect and improve the health, safety and welfare of the residents and businesses of, and Asitors to, the City of South Miami by enhancing the minimum requirements of the Florida Building Code;and, N)TMREAS,prior to the passage of the Florida Building Code, south Florida was governed by the South Florida Building Code, which code required individual property owners to maintain all rain run-off on their property;and, WHEREAS,-flooding is a major issue in the state of Florida and specifically a j major issue for the general health, welfare and safety of the residents and businesses of South Miami,and, WHEREAS,pursuant to the powers vested in South Miami pursuant to chapters 163 and 166,Florida Statutes, the City desires to enhance its minimum standards for all properties (commercial and residential), to require, individual property owners to maintain stormwater drainage on their properties;and WHEREAS, at its January 16, 2007 meeting the Planning Board, after public bearing, adopted .a motion by a vote of 4 ayes and 2 nays (IVIs. Yates, Ms. Beckman) recommending denial of the proposed amendments; and. { Additions shown by imderlinin and deletions shown by evergti . Page l of 4 Ord. No. 06-07-1907 'WHEREAS,the Mayor and City Commission desire to amend Section 20-4.7, of the Land Development Code to require greater enforcement of the City's stormwater drainage requirements,and to correct the title of Section 20-4.7 to correctly reflect that the chapter provides minimum standards for all construction, not just for residential housing,and; VvREREAS, the Mayor and City Commission also seek to delete superfluous subsection(J)relating'to rehabilitation areas as no such areas exist in the city. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,FLORIDA: Section 1. Section 20-4.7(C)(4)is amended to reads as follows: 20-4.7 Minimum hexsin standards. (C) Exterior Property Areas. (4) Stormwater Drainage. Stormwater contributing or causing recurrent or ponding shall be eliminated through proper filing, elevating drainage, or grading of the site. The ground shall be graded away from the, building and foundation, but not so as to cause water to drain onto adioin.ing propertykiLes j or to recurrently drain onto public rights-of-way. Prone owners shall be required to maintain adequate swales, French drains. or other. mechanisms to ensure that stormwater does not drain onto adjoining properties or public rights-of-way. In all new construction, . or ad4itioas any significant addition that results in changes to the elevation of the.site that would result in runoff to adiacent properties or the right-of-way made after =, 21=-1) 1 March 6. 2007 , failure to comply with this subsection shall result in the denial of a certificate of occupancy or certificate of use until such time as sufficient proof is provided to the City Building Planning and Public Works Departments that the development shall retain stormwater on site or that adequate drainage is provided so as to prevent the development from contributing or causing recurrent pondin t�o pro or public rights-of-tiva, (J}—neftifleate of Qe-GaI+a w)L--(.n Reserved Additions shown by underlining and deletions shown by eitrsti-1b Page 2 of 4 Ord. No. 06-07=1907 (3) (2) -064if- ease Peqv&�ed. AN 3e eaaa>retia&, vec g,- man . ercausing to be ee ideeted a e n er-,lessee-, b + y 7 v ua 1drig ased F +,bita; designated h`"� it Gi p@nCy 6 E 1@ tag A i6a4- , ,.. e FEiEE-PAa -tf B-F6 A96u F vC,i;( v,�o ,F , .a. , shall be issued for-n 1 ding. ed ; -11 ait f r-lyuman-hayi do until building e ffieial reerfifi— 1-h-1 1-h-building or-pffirt lheereaf used feT human habitagee eefl�bfflls t the pfe'Aisiens ef this Code.- r h,—efe designated ifl. uaa. FeserAs shall spe-6ifiealb- null;.... the attention 4&-the-a 0 essee of the t +' s} z 1.,...4p a l f 5&, ri ) r Section 2. If any section,clause, sentence,or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, the holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. -Section 3. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are repealed. Section 4. This ordinance shall be codified and included in the Land Development Code. Section 5. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon enactment. PASSED AND ADOPTED this��day of ;l?�i n-�f� , 2007. A ITEST: APPROVED: CITI YyCL.ERK MAYOR 1"Reading- 2/20/�T 2"d Reading- 3/6/07 Additions shown by underlining and deletions shown by o.eFstrb. Ord, No. 06-07-1907 (4) CONWSSION VOTE: 5-o READ AND APPROV-ED AS TO FORM: Mayor Feliu: Yea Pl�1 ,j Vice Mayor Wiscombe: Yea 1► { �----- Commissioner Birts: Yea Luis P4 Figueredo, Commissioner Palmer: Yea Nagilf Gallop Figueredo,P.A. Commissioner Beckman: Yea Office of City Attorney P:Tomm items9007,0-6-07TB-07-001 LDC Amend 20-4.7 Stormwaier Ord.doc Additions shown by underlinine and deletions shown by eversEFikang-. sou�,y F + 3 J weM/'OM� CITY OF SOUTH MIANH PLANNING &ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 BOARD APPLICATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND PRESERV — STREET ADDRESS OF JOB: 6-7 --I ' PROPERTY OWNER: G S M REAL ESTATE L L C. TEL.NO. ADDRESS: �CJ 3� � to N I A GJ i • GC��L- �Ta��l✓�� STA-M j l� cm s» - WIiAT IS THE PRESENT USE OF THE PROPERTY? SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE BUSINESS OFFICE RETAIL STORE OTHER: APARTMENT OR TOWNHOUSE MEDICAL OFFICE AUTO REPAIR PLEASE,BRIEFLY SUMMARIZE THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED: E�,n� G C�s vN t �-to2Y s IN� Lr E �� ► L-y �5lt�E N c•�. Coco WHAT WTLL THE TOTAL COST BE TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT? I oo 000. 00 IQ bMb(�l QAG{-�C.O TEL NO. 7�.�✓'U5� ' CoCo� ' ZS 3 APPLICANT'S NAME: �y �� A x O (�M 3 3 �SS ADDRESS: o S. Y Z. 'A' v ` TE l M FAX NUMBER.C3 oS� CoG� 3 d? AS THE APPLICANT,P INDICATE YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO THIS PROJECT OWNER OF THE PROPERTY TENANT I LESSEE CONTRACTOR OTHER: OWNER OF THE BUSINESS ARCHITECT ENGINEER PLEASE,INDICATE CONTACT PERSON B's decision will be mailed to the contact n Indicated below PROPERTY OWNER APPLICANT OTHER(provide name and PLEASE SIGN YOUR NAME ON THE LINE ABOVE DATE YAERPB\ERPB Application Form REVISED FOR-2007-2009.doc , 6 1 solar gain in the 21 st Century Part L2 of Building Regulations demands solar gain is an issue taken into consideration within the overall design of all commercial buildings. It States: "Buildings should be constructed such that: a.Those occupied spaces that rely on natural ventilation should not overheat when subject to a moderate level of internal heat gain. b:Those spaces that incorporate mechanical ventilation or cooling do not require excessive cooling plant capacity to maintain the required space conditions". Swag -ua-in Solutions 11 Abstracted from BRE IP11 02=:table 1 summary of performance.Data for different shading systems SHADING METHOD COST PRACTICAL ADVERSE EFFECTS LONG TERM Curtains _ ^ low _y _ attract dust _ light shield Will fade Blinds medium cleaning issues light shield will degenerate Glass Film _____high maintenance issues winter light loss ` degradation _ Fans energy user noise disturbance turbulent air space Solar Glass initially expensive retro-fit very intrusive _i degradation Reduce window area neutral neutral reduces natural light_neutral Eaves Overhang expense on roof yes —maintenance Solar Shading/Brise soled high but sustainable y_es _ minimal _ `maintenance CONTROL METHOD Air Conditioning high energy user high maintenance health issues cost Solar Shading `t The natural Solution ' Why solar shading/ brise soleil? • Works quite naturally when needed • Low Maintenance re-cyclable aluminium. • Easy to retrofit with low interference to occupancy. • Allows natural working environment for all. 0 Materials `Shadex' Elliptical section blades r Hollow blades combine strength with elegance providing the desired amount of protection whilst enhancing the buildings appearance. X50 100 Blade �I 91 100 141 45.0° 150 Blade M 139 150 212 45.0° 200 Blade M 29.5 186 283 200 45.0° 300 Blade r, FZ2 o ; P47 232 300 424 Sizes Size mm Centres mm set out at 450 Blades/m projection Maximum span/m Self-weight kg/m 100 141 7 3.3 9.0 150 212 5 3.3 11.0 i j200 283 4 4.2 13.0 Ij 300 424 3 5.0 14.2 Further blade sizes are available to special order l 0 �. Correction factors used with appendix h of part L2 - l; 01, j One approach to achieving L2 compliance involves proving that the average 1, °dow solar load per unit floor area is not be greater than 25W/m2 when subjected t to a given level of irradiance. Appendix H of L2,which explains the procedure fully,requires a reduction I ak factor to be incorporated into the calculation. It does not however offer a reduction factor for brise soleil. Based on an overhang of 50%of the depth 3 of the window on a south facing facades,the following correction factors can ; +� be used for this method of calculation. f f Correction factor 0.38 Very wide openings.(ie.where the width of the window and solar shade are at least 5 times the height of the window). k r � _ i Correction factor 0.45 ! t Wide openings.(ie.where the width of the window and solar shade are at i least twice the height of the window). t 3 r f Correction factor 0.52 Square openings.(ie.where the width of the window and solar shade is equal to the height of the window). E m Correction factor 0.63 , I =' Narrow openings.(ie.where the width of the window and solar shade is less than the height of the window). i Abstracted from BRE IP17/03 For more information and design assistance phone us on: 0115 9301521 or a-mail us on: techinfo @dales-eaves.co.uk (�J Other products available from Dales Rainwater systems 1 Dales design and manufacture a wide range of rainwater goods that include both standard and bespoke systems.These systems can be integrated into our fascia soffit systems to provide a complete, low maintenance eaves system. - Details of Dales stondord rainwater systems can be found in our Architectural Aluminium Rainwater Systems'literature. Fasdo Soffit Systems&the Total Eaves Concept Dales design and manufacture a wide range of fascia soffit systems that suit both traditional and contemporary,building designs.These designs often include the integration of rainwater goods and secondary support to provide complete,low maintenance eaves systems. Details of Dales fascia soffit systems.can be found in our'Total eaves concepts&solutions'literature. Meridian Coping Systems Dales Fabrications design and manufacture a range of wall capping systems in aluminium which provide an attractive and low maintenance alternative to more traditional stone copings. Further information is available in our'Meridian Coping Systems'literature. For more information on any of the above products or o copy of any of the literature referred to,please contact a.member of our project management team on Tel:01 1.5 930 1521. DALES Dales Fabrications Ltd Crompton Road Industrial Estate, Ilkeston,Derbyshire DE7 4BG Tel: 01-15 930 1521 & Fax: 0115 930 7625 x website: www.dales-ecives.co.uk f email: sales @dales-eaves.co.uk i " Products: Insulated Panels: SSP Roof Panel Page 1 of 3 CAPS coMaANrsmas oraEgs coNmcrus 0O ® , t Of D Select a Page } PANEL SYSTEMS APPLIED SURFACES SPECIFICATIONS CAD LIBRARY SSP ROOF PANEL WITH VERSALOKT°" Thermal Properties-Test Data SSP ROOF PANEL RWP ROOF/WALL PANEL ESP WALL PANEL F IPP WALLIPARTITION PANEL ABP WALL PANEL EWP WALL PANEL DESIGNERTM SERIES Description: The SSP Standing Seam Roof Panel with the patented Versal-okT'sidelap connection.The panel is a true factory foamed-in-place trapezoidal roof panel with a standing seam offering superior weathertightness.With the IPS patented Versal-okTM sidelap,the roof panels snap together before being mechanically seamed.This Tecfoam panel is filled with non CFC polyurethane modified isocyanurate foam achieving R-values up to 39.5. Dimensions: Nominal 36"coverage;Thickness(T)—2",2'/2",3",4"and 5". 36"Coverage 2 7/8" 1T Material: Exterior- 24 ga.steel(std). 26,22 ga.also available. Interior- 26 ga.steel(std). 24,22 ga.also available. Finish Exterior- GalvalumePlus@ Options: Signature®200(silicone polyester) Signature®300(Kynar 500®/Hylar 5000®) Interior- USDA White(standard) Signature®200(silicone polyester) Colors: IPS Panel Color and Finish Guide Texture: The exterior skin is smooth as a standard and available embossed as an option.The interior skin is embossed only. Length: The maximum recommended length is 35'0".Contact IPS for panel length options. Fasteners: Concealed clip,14 ga.steel base with an 18 ga.steel tab. Test Data Test Purpose Procedure Results Thermal http://www.insulated-panels.com/products/ssp_roof panel.html 8/12/2008 Products: Insulated Panels: SSP Roof Panel Page 2 of 3 properties of the panels Guarded Hot Box (see published values for panel type and thickness) Resistance The leakage rate for the SSP panel Air Leakage Measures air leakage ASTM E283 will not exceed through the panel joints Chamber Method 0.01 CFM/SF at 40 psf pressure differential Water ' Measures water leakage ASTM E331 No water penetration at pressure Penetration through the panel joints Chamber Method differential of 50 psf for the SSP panel Determines the load/span ASTM E72 Panel load/span and deflection tables Strength properties of the roof and Chamber Method are available wall panels Underwriters SSP Roof Panels have a Class 90 Laboratories rating with UL 580 a 7'-0"pudin spacing Determines uplift resistance Of roof panels SSP Roof Panels have a Class 1-75 in high winds and 1-90 rating with a 5'-0"pudin Factory Mutual spacing. Wind STD.4471(1995) Uplift SSP Roof Panels qualify for a Class SH Hailstorm rating Determines ultimate uplift SSP Roof Panels have an ultimate capacity of roof panels ASTM E1592 uplift capacity of 100 psf with a 6'-0"pudin spacing Core Material(5") Flame Spread 20* Underwriters Smoke Developed 400 Laboratories UL 723 (ASTM E84) Finished Panels 2"to 5"Panel Determines the surface Flame Spread 15* Smoke Developed Surface Burning burning characteristics of 250-450 the core and panels Factory Mutual ASTM E84 Core Material(5") Flame Spread 25*,Smoke Developed 180 http://www.insulated-panels.com/products/ssp_roof panel.html 8/12/2008 Products: Insulated Panels: SSP Roof Panel Page 3 of 3 Evaluates the Factory Mutual STD. All wall and roof panels are rated Room burning of roof and wall 4880(1994) Class 1 to 30 ft.high,5 in.max. Fire Test panels in a (UBC 26-3) thickness room configuration Underwriters Laboratories The SSP Roof Panel UL 790. is rated Class A (ASTM E108) Evaluates the Roof Covering burning of Fire Test roof covering from external fire Factory Mutual The SSP Roof Panel STD.4471(1995) is rated Class A (ASTM E108) 'The numerical flame spread rating is not intended to reflect hazards presented by this or any other material under actual fire conditions. Thermal Properties SSP Roof Panel Product Code Thickness "U"Factor "R"Factor SSP 200 2" .067 14.9 SSP 250 2 1/2" .053 19.0 SSP 300 3" .043 23.1 SSP 400 4" 1 .032 31.3 SSP 500 5" 1 .025 39.5 Note:Insulation values determined by tests conducted in accordance with ASTM C236 at a mean temperature of 75 degrees F.,winter condition corrected to 15 mph outside and still inside. back to too http://www.insulated-panels.com/products/ssp_roofpanel.html 8/12/2008 Products: Insulated Panels: RWP Roof/Wall Panel Page 1 of 2 CAPS -L:CiMPANY STORE CAREERS � CCN4uCT US 01 y: 1=" - F select a Page ? w i PANEL SYSTEMS, APPLIED SURFACES SPECIFICATIONS CAD LIBRARY ' r 1 RWP ROORWALL PANEL Thermal Properties-Test Data SSP ROOF PANEL RWP ROOFIWALL PANEL ESP WALL PANEL jr} i Ak IPP WALL/PARTITION PANEL ABP WALL PANEL EWP WALL PANEL DESIGNERTM SERIES Description: The RWP Panel functions well as a roof or wall panel when used in conjunction with pre- engineered building framing systems.The product features an over-lapping major rib at the panel sidelap.Exposed fasteners are located in the major ribs when the panel is used as a roof and in the pan when the panel is used in a wall application.This Tecfoam panel is filled with non CFC polyurethane modified isocyanurate foam achieving R-values up to 35.7. Dimensions: Nominal 36"coverage;Thickness(T)—1%",2",2?h"and 3".Contact IPS regarding the availability of 4"and 5"thick panels. 36"Coverage 1 12" 1 11411 Material: Exterior- 26 ga.steel(std).24 and 22 ga.also available. Interior- 26 ga.steel(std).24 and 22 ga.also available. Finish Options: Exterior- Galvalume Plus® Signature®200(silicone polyester) Signature®300(Kynar 5008/Hylar 50000) Interior- USDA White(standard) Signature®200(silicone polyester) Colors: IPS Panel Color and Finish Guide Texture: The exterior skin is smooth as a standard and available embossed as an option.The interior skin is embossed only. Length: The maximum recommended length is 35'0".Contact IPS for panel length options. Fasteners: Exposed-hex head with neoprene washers. Test Data Test Purpose Procedure Results Good R values for an HCFC Foam Thermal Determines insulating ASTM C236 Guarded System Resistance properties of the panels Hot Box (see published values for panel type and thickness) Determines the load/span ASTM E72 Chamber Panel load/span and deflection tables http://www.insulated-panels.com/products/rwp_roof wall_panel.html 8/12/2008 Products: Insulated Panels: RWP Roof/Wall Panel Page 2 of 2 Strength properties of the roof and Method are available wall panels RWP Roof Panels have a class 1-60 Determines uplift rating with a Wind resistance Factory Mutual STD. 5'0"purlin spacing Uplift of roof panels in high 4471(1995) winds RWP Roof Panels qualify for a Class SH Hailstorm rating Determines the surface Surface Burning bum ing Factory Mutual characteristics of the core ASTM E84 Core Material(5")> and panels Flame Spread 25",Smoke Developed 180 Evaluates the burning of Factory Mutual roof All wall and roof panels are rated Class 1 Room Fire Test and wall panels in a room STD.4880(1994) to 30 ft.high,5 in.max.thickness configuration (UBC 26-3) Roof Covering Evaluates the burning of Factory Mutual STD. Fire Test roof 4471(1995) The RWP Roof Panel is rated Class A covering from extemal fire (ASTM E108) 'The numerical flame spread rating is not intended to reflect hazards presented by this or any other material under actual fire conditions. Thermal Properties RWP Roof or Wall Panel Product Code Thickness "U"Factor "R"Factor RWP 150 1 1/2" .082 12.2 RWP 200 2" .064 15.6 RWP 250 2 1/2" .053 18.9 RWP 300 3" .045 22.3 RWP 400 4" .034 29.0 RWP 500 5" .028 35.7 Note:Insulation values determined by tests conducted in accordance with ASTM C236 at a mean temperature of 75 degrees F.,winter condition corrected to 15 mph outside and still inside. back to to http://www.insulated-panels.com/products/rwp_roof wall_panel.html 8/12/2008 50U7y • 7 LJ ,K �O ASO �1 CITY OF SOUTH MIATM PLANNING &ZONING DEPARTMENT ENVIROTlTJTAL REVIEW AND PRESERVATION BOARD APPLICATION 2 A / SOUTH MIAMI,FL 6 STREET ADDRESS OF JOB: �p Q J S Y`� • -7 � PROPERTY OWNER: GSM REAL G fT' T F LL C. TEL.NO. ADDRESS: 23-7 71�tAN I A e5AeLEc.-,j � sLre�3�J 14G 5 cTTy STREET WHAT IS THE PRESENT USE OF THE PROPERTY? F INGLE-FAMEY RESIDENCE BUSINESS OFFICE RETAIL STORE OTHER:PARTMENT OR TOWNHOUSE MEDICAL OFFICE AUTO REPAIR PLEASE,BRIEFLY SUMMARIZE THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED: E s N L E f L y � Goo 000. 0 0 WHAT WILL THE TOTAL COST BE TO COMLETE THIS PROJECT? TEL No.�.3cs'� ' « 7 3 °�° 2 S APPLICANTS NAME: (�, 3 3 ISS ADDRESS: O !• Z Sv c ��"'E ( M Lam � air aff FAX NUMBER: AS THE APPLICANT,P INDICATE YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO THIS PROJECT OWNER OF THE PROPERTY TENANT I LESSEE CONTRACTOR onmL- OWNER OF THE BUSINESS ARCHITECT EAIGINFIR PLEASE,INDICATE CONTACT PERSON B's decision will be mailed to the confect n indicated below PROPERTY OWNER APPLICANT OTHER(provide name and + LEASE=IGN YOUR NAME ON THE LINE ABOVE DATE Y:\ERPBTMB Application Form REVISED FOR2007 2008.doc MILLIE CAGOL a��► + 2790 NW 104 COURT MIAMI,FL.33172 ® TELEPHONE:305-588-5870 sales @lafinestra.us ® ��aQ(D QDOV9Q1?EDam0 MILLIE CAGOL 2790 NW 104 COURT MIAMI,FL.33172 ' FINESTRA, L.C. TELEPHONE:305-588-5870 sales @lafinestra.us ' .: - :,,�rt!'f.'�''E�1',hd°A �.'w,"`y'�k`k�c',k:rGd" !Y'tC�``�:. ,`•, Jy, Z - - -.......-... - m O r m Cr 0 tri H .. - C k 0 �' ::::::::::.:: .� C 6....::•rirrrr::c:rr:i•rrrr:•:•:i•: r:i•r:i•rrr:�::�:�:•rr:•::ci:i•:::•:::::::.�::..... .................................................................................. < 9 m Z 9.:: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. :::::::::::::::::::::::::1N3W3�Vd1lVHdSV'OZ::::: :::::::: :::: ::::::::::::::::::::::: .. .. .............................................................................. zl� t3' CO • o o osz b ) .0019L vMvd Nah a 00 '' >1 °a o o si 0o y j M Am D o 3 N3 N al 9 ('all ON') —® f r a 01 ON) �'OI ON) 0 3ON33 'O'n'd °o,51.=S "Z/I, 'd'I'3 k, _ .Z/t 'd'I'd °' oz=S 4 1a.09'0 ' OZ=H �� .OZ=H 0> o � C � n D AO'OZ �o 09'0=0 6° '91 Nd0 9 m to m O m m Z O z C n o n u m T tU s VNVIDNIOd lVAOa D � ZNXO<0x zzvpu 3 c O °gg Z C�D�n��m zm�vo F z z 'o- v m � m� ,-p1rZp)�m0 nm m ^ M n Fp SL=H 77 Z- p A m D u f �O=OZ DC-<c7� o..r v p m D �� Al=0 50 00 m cn m(nCo'�z bad ° m m n mz 3NId Z T� Z O Z.: o' z 0 i (n a: zm-u O -<XXOmC)OmN m" o °m o o z D 2�Z1 CADS D' m n zo m n2XON>LTv m- O z n p m tty Sz c0 7x C��-DIO 2zD 5 ?_ o � z o O St=S m ��mz�,Kroz u .• < z m z ,oZ=H a X Z.Z -.q m o -, , '9l=a tl M �Oc?p45rcEn v" m on m m c NVO 0Z_H �. m = n Cn (naonZ m.• Do = S p 0 'S'l=a A comoc Z�Z(n O m p A NVO -I Oa)'--m�0-oE 00 Po O m 4 -<'u O cn(n m m c, Z it D T COCC0 v = m x D 0-D4-n < 4 p 0T � o v ° cn XKm00-< co r C Dmm-j-C ZrnX-2 'K � M co_IO m = m D z m v z v r-DT�mA z CA m N v m m < OZ n m o v mz r O = 2 { r Zm<mD� W Z A D m x m rm0C"j>-0 W y m � °v �0 O =0zzOrmrq D 55A m Gn�Zzt7�m m z m a W 0p 0 cn M Z M Q�m`2p��" � 0 z z z m OZ=H OZ=H a 4 00 m tpOC`mx X00 _ � m vC S-I, S�=S 5�=0 � CA m A r- m m--I w n z ^ NVO � 'OZ=H NVO � -�. D�nT>j(nD O T v 'Ol=a OZ=H X41 0-nx mZCr N P z x < N`d0 I1 sl_a p OMpX.<� < m m m m 7� I� p K D MXXZO m m z 5 � o v �/ /\ C7 Mr(n�Z-M:l O O m m z m m mooD�m-C " ' T o ° ;1Zm-<-0 -1 N Z vv m > Zp2:coZco 0� < = 3 m 2 mD(n r < m m � m � m m000DO [7m� < 8 p m z moo 000rX o x 0 c-mm Z 0Nc--IOZ-> 2 m m A o Z 0pI 9 St=S z- -D co ZC m T �, m y '0Z=H G) -<:C o n y m z r X m 'SL=a 0 c NVO < z � m m j z ..,. 0 m v v --q cn M -' N U S C 0 �amfl' zomm OZ=S �cA � coam OZ=S i;- f s.a) No Q= m m tTi 9 C'SZ=H SZ=a N v 3 cn ',d cn H 'Z=a m OJNVW (D ° =3 `� H H tMry t'IOONVW m m v Sj m z H C=i o r �� °w »� yzi En O J o ° m v a �I aN33 a00M'S map <.3 ° 03� n 2 H' > 'St=S 0p(n &=1 �m3 »' !Z �. n 'SL=S )J ` AZ=H Etl rm-� i ;� O ,OZ=H J S'L=O � m ° o O° ° H .d 0'l=a ` NVO 0ZZ N < X='w '.''d H N NVO OC m O?.� C.O 0 O. l n 0(n z 3 m A D < n td x z L po` ti NCN m-v rvco:,< am J v N oo m ° H H C7 04=S OL H SZ=H y y w< m o Nr4.o m O H O ti` / SC=H l=a y rvm 1 ° w 4aE:-!R Z Z �1 cn m4 ( s=a Z=a ril a 0. m 3 o r 2. tJ e6 VNVIONIOd IVAOa WIVd OJNVW y 1 CD v ro v � tTl p, w v a c v N td ra t=i v rn d a(n 0. '00'0Z In` ag O U �- • O C=1 t-4 I r 301\13=1 -D'A'd r o g S 0 Z O ' Z H 7 a,oe la'08'0 00 m m p v CD m n tTi 000M Fi6l 3 O 0 pd Cn x'01 ON) o ..� OD N � � - d'I'3 m Sl=S 'OS=S 3aN3='l'a a° T O 0 'oz=H W '�� )r00 69 6 z N Z ' (n 9 cn m 0 t=a OZ=H y m 0 v �� v° m 'l=a O N C td �ibO OOWN v 0 rrn c r <c H n JL33HJLS n m tTl vN c�n � m m o y m in H H N r o C 8 1 1 9 1 _ rn L 3 " ' n ?� O C7 cn O cn a td Ca 550 C - o�D z (n O cl- Hx^ E m p C H O 4 J !� A L9l tlI r x s o m e ?< m a) ;u m t7 td O Z < D 2 `< �" z m tri Z ZZe < _ " 2 2 f, ' t7 ° ° N 0 to co `� m 6 1 04 co N w m O C Z O O A I X m m OP W D. o - m T U) O° �" J-33HJLS 4399 'AA's m o r 3 --, CERTIFIED TO: CSM REAL ESTATE, LLC., A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, 6835 W z S.W. 67TH ST., SOUTH MIAMI, FL. 33143., SALOMON, KANNER, DAMIAN & RODRIGUEZ, ON r °oo P.A., FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY. x o i. N Ln „ c to LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE WEST 161 FEET OF TRACT 6 CA = OF NELSON HOMESITES SUBDIVISION !?� ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 39 AT PAGE 57 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS MIAMI-DADS COUNTY,FLORIDA a o ` w I I x r1--------- --- w----- QK ------------- H G '-V SID S K M2 -WH G 20' �iIDE S HT 4 12-V ID E CK UP Og2-0"HEI I UP T 12' IGHT CUM MU S �rK I i I UMMU THE CK I I I I I I I I I I I I ca o CM0 G) X i i i i I A Oo m $ I I I I I . .... ... .. cn A -gyp C r fi'i N itj'yi. I =r-p-8 00 pONm z Ih' I 1 1 m Z C o G) ------- Yra,•4 I I cn cp o aR A A G) }" " I I ° Cl) rtf�o c I ; iil I III I N Nm O � G)G)T 8m i A�ti. } �a .1n III cn ry v� 0 m° m m r cmA Zi° ;k 1 II I m A O x2 I e;�•: ?'r �r I I v —1 Ora O oo m -n O m O CC7 p o O D I I aY•�.,'fir'sv"k a3 '7•. I .•�' d^.nS! 4/•r-l''ytil �7 n 91 �_ y _ I ,, �j�a f.ya•{� i. 3, �s• l�l.E�r I v m G) 'Zi `Pii 4�[3 �:��ll__jj$${T''' :6'r`�`{•. z`2 a .° ;. W CD I -yY •':yc > I I .•.�; ;{.r'ijy,.xt.c o- `•Y I lA� I I ..t y'�?.�F C'?l..l.;��ka C....t1 ❑ N � .. I I .�r,i�. I i i I S�'`� 'rzc.'•,f'rf��,iz�Y ° ��Ly• 1 I �.+•��.•.�r. it`',-�'r N Rr1 CO) I I 12' -0 D A D A w �o I °m MI+ATOq u _ O � � � � � y,D EOU 1P b; mm Cl) Cl) tn � CO) CUD I j b v pA0m A � —4 I $ I I � I I � I I I I I I FT:M m I I P a R A \\\\ \\\ \\ .�,1♦ \\�1 I O cn y A 1.\ \\\\ \\♦ \♦ ti\\ \1 I m fn 7G \\ \\\\ \\ ♦ 1\\\ omo m M � I z a, m ; s El Oo O 0 w �Z � � rn �� ___-_______________-__________ cn �z m �m C" O ON T = m c ? cv � z cn A o mz pg cn 9 A 1'T1 0° 0 � Z C_— U) I 'D m m � rn S -n C .-. � �0r . rn 5t SO 6 'moo oO i "Mai wu III I�,�n■L--- i� � � � ■!L■ ■■■■I :: • IR III .I■.I. ._-_--• NMI -.� INN NMI ON OEM — �� 1■III � : ■■ :� � =- _:.. I ■ .� ��t. I■■11 moo , ------------------ Ell �� :•i::r:H�Hi:•ii:•;a.i;ri;;YfK.i::• :ii Gi',i':i'iiiiY ........................ _ � :�.• ,.� :.................................I .:i::ir..rr.•u.r.•r•..s•er•...s•.r.rr... •uuuuu ..• •• .u•.uu...uu..c.•.r-ru.uu•uu.u� ::�:::::.:.•uu..•.•uu.u.us .. _ _ .................. •"...... "`••••"•`•' '�•"'iT:i.7:i:a ui isas'::iii::isi:i:::::i• :.'::•iiii • •. ••ss•?i Cv r...u.•.♦ i ••.:our u.••••u..r.•.••u..�ii��:::�:• is:::::e�::i•' :i: r•.••.o..•..•••• •.sum i••::•i::i::�:i::.°•:iu•� •.rs....rsr..r.� rr • uuuuuu r .. i-•��}i'-.u.•r•:�i::::i:::::u.s••u•••u..u•�r:•�i:i i�:a:::�r•.urusrusuu:: :•:ii:•+.r..0 r::.ususuuuu•nFy= •iii::•�:.:::�.i • it:Z...............j.:.*4*..N:i'�r�J-15;;ruuuuuuu•uuuuuusuuu• ru.uuuu •uuuuuuuu uu•uuuuuu•uu.��u;uuu.u.usuu u�n?iruu uu.uuu .:......:u•uru uuu•uuu uuu uuu noun uuuuuuuuupu.uu� .....r::� is�.::::::::'i.•"•••••'•'•••'••'•••••`•":iii::::::i:::::.:i::a:.i::::ru.ur.•.. • ::::uu.r.uruu.r•u..•••••' :r:.•::�:a::�::::::•:::i�::::::e.:::::::'• i s•r.uuu••uu.uuu•.• i.:•i::i::::::�:i:�u.•u•uuruu.urua ..................��i::::' :•:::� ••�i:urn • u:•i:::�:a"'•""•'•••••'•••' ."'•..'•"'r"'••••••• uuu:u H`s^e4•u••:•..•...�•::': :::::•i:'i::•i:'�::" :i::'i::::::i�:i�:�:L:isi::::::::•.••..�":::::::':�i::::•i i:ii'i�.�::ii:i:%< ;; ..::iii m T 9 Z I � i i I � 8 i ; 1 I € i Z , I � i El o� l i I z � ji v v I i I j '�' i 11LJ�� m I m I m ; a �I m i m j j m I I _ 0 � I � j I O I O I II O I Z I II Z I i I I I rz �co j l azi Hi - 00 i cn r � � - Rill SRI!R m O cn D cnm o 4 cn Dm _z F- '..'..' �Z D �m D w 0 O � O � 70 n zZ cc Wm cj) r * O 0) O cn cl) � o � c.n Drn �m M • Sri.�a?i�,..t.+... �.: .`� `..a= :,.'...... >�"�` .....s U9 b.L..>.i:.,� ' 1:3 HOORT OF TREE 13 HEIGHT ' 3'-0' Of TREE go ° I m � � I I � I {� ay a I All ? AAA° X I I al ° 6 z § z L n I I Z m l'jl t Ln u N Wu- mew . ..� �u •WU-°°.�w M.., -° n A 1 (Rt� �li'il � Iilli� _ 0 Q S z y; P 6 �i�66it 6666 66 6666bb666666bb 66• A D ^ C Ogggg�ggf SSSSfff S�g SSS g�SfSSf Sf Sf SSSfS SS ry :676 6�'r E6' r.'a:r1r ... < Z ii'ii' F a i a i i a 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 9 i i 2 2 2 2 2 a s 1 I: ________ _______ I�'i 1 T1.1 18 8 1 1 1 - ..0 -- I I FI III I.Il,il -I,i' I❑❑❑ I.lill IIIIII'llllil illll III it:1111' ___ 6 RM N a s f 3 C - - ❑ ❑ ❑❑❑ — O 31� d a a3a aaaaaa.� o L�J ❑ B8 ❑ ❑❑❑ - � pp 1 10 . vh H4hhkyyONa'vQ4a§vhv�y0� wNkva-a4��Qa Z I II 11 II #I q��•.^.•'.•V 949��Q�RQ'^.4RRRR'no•:999QQRQQ°oo° o44QQR ry � I� L-I I -RM- =aa= 1 rl, A I I g®I qA i-1 e 1 L J I •l is s:4 rl` �' \\\\\\\ 'f\\\\\\\\ \y L IJ 0. � 5 y -��i> D -------------------_ _ _ date 03.°4.09 revisions NEW RESIDENCE FOR: NoTe. RAM O N P A C H E C C o o . '.� issued d Ptaa. tha Ivet.e . � yyAaht°E th.°r°hltwt, D Mr. & Mrs. CESAR MELGOZA 3�°°P°`°°`° a"°'°°`°t 1 drawn s� e� e;�tfor architect & planner 4ee bY ea comma°d o:°nary d checked o.c Q Q FLORIDA AA0003534 / AR0006412 0 - of Pn.°on P ee4o a O project no. 1113 SOU S.W. 67th. ST. eege°tee. P ) Q � SOUTH MIAMI be3o aouu.eet 92na ayeuue Butte 101,wean,novae 33166 teleynone(906)666-269 I3 g fi' 'O TIIUNK L^ �� •��dd� 8a �p�@ pg @"g Y.� ��$�7EELYp Lg'= � ❑'° Miarnii-01.6488-0002 3/4/2009 16,02:55 AL POP, 101 gFI3n8�aHR°s� �Y ^R��83n��y�;�s��'��a��'? .3i�H @°H�I¢3s ��s°-sg$�6�gg�¢�ga�a ----------- fi�•- � B� 3Z &� 'I H ,1 -�9"ai �+ 8 8 �R 1111"'IHl$�,T� ^�r'e tl E.e da� 'r Ssg � a T. Rg3 4gg3e°.. 20 SUMCK �d R gg 5Q SQL - sgy fag - $�"HR¢925� IMP ZR'HEIeHT ga` M TNESETBAOKt © I+ saB� a S�PI Y�, "gd 4q s'S" H H 36i SR F�. �a sga Ma� i5Q�+e5 I^i �� . s rd wY 453'diQ'rg I I+ OL SL In F q �, �N��ME � p- 33 y6 R 'q•d�aE `a.6's 8 y; � � I I �� s•FB�3 x CH� d6 4 4 6�a�a"3°e � 0 5 I I+ YS e 8 �g S ae"q A IT� n c duo 11 O o/ I ¢¢ gg g g �1, + a a aHa HH ASH $ "H9a�HSa 3 . fat.8.3 z S E EE FE 6 H i'K}S: - F'SEEE E.F E 6 .SS .E _ D 1 ?SSSS SSSS55�555 "��55SSS55 S55 S55 55 it P p n i j tEI7+ a I+ f °fill a € � K s 'S KC ® ® CCCJJJ��"' F + I II�� 1 Z ❑ II 88 w + 3"�333d 3Ais 73=7��•�wF 3i77aR33AS 3s 737s7,i 3 � ;;ji' e 8 j � ❑❑ � Y I+MEN 333 + I Li _ I+ 0 + I ��@�@i�I 1 Z + - gu iil 0 I� ® ® eTIT"�� NFLN I 10001 --- .K�r ❑ ❑�❑p❑IN — EP I❑❑❑I _ ogo . d ® O ®® r — �r � 11 ❑ r - I I I I I I 1 1 I I I � IS SOD SOD + lid NN am NN R01 + I I - Ego U � px p '0• 'k S Cm (iS9p�EdM� Cp Sn D A I+ € � b I I Fig ------- tl Z 5` iP 9y r yD + 4 z yy'e w t ' S i' - -- - l z + \\\\\\\\I\\\ \\\\\y 3 �dy6~ K �1 11 11 T a H go. x y HIM'yy �B date 030403 revisions N , RAM 0 N PAC HE C C NEW RESIDENCE FOR: m°ae eb7a a.brai aro.w.a I � issued Q 0 .p�°r'on�of en°°w"�- N Q Q rsamon P.onaco a n..00t•�.. c0 drawn �� Mr. & Mrs. CESAR MELGOZA °° a°• r-d1 °Pfw: architect & planner W W Sn D.al mlva=w O.C. •been°o�bI ofe i.neeou�iR N o checked 0 0 FLORIDA we o RO fi neca�eaOe AA0003534 / AR0006412 O 6835 S.W. 67th. ST. isot1s °" project no. 0813 Q Q SOUTH MIAMI 4840.,°n ae v4Da a.anua wta 7m mam.naNm DRSDE-aPhoa°(HDS)666-HD7 f NO oil I M11 .............. ................... F `� _ ii I�t� � �iq�g1.■ 1111 � _ _� �t r i . �r � F; �. - . i VA AW loft ♦ t Im- Am \ M Air Ik � n • +fr. ti . � yL • ' • l j ------ L - `is__ A-6 n/ f 5 t 111 Ali II . . . . ..:..: .A ! fit � �11 w � : architect&planner .rnrais w..anraa ry � PROPERTY 6838 SW 67th ST 6838 SW 67th ST TO THE WEST ENTRY GATE LOT AREA a .; r 1a, "'•` - . mom. _+.. ..._- '>�AM, Reiff PROPERTY PROPERTY TO THE EAST TO THE EAST ENTRY GATE LOT AREA s 7i p AF4 6 s1 w c. 1. 67th ST WEST VIEW 67th ST EAST VIEW PROPERTY TO SOUTH PROPERTY TO SOUTH WEST EAST MELGOZA RESIDENCE 6835 SW 67th ST, SOUTH MIAMI FL . r r� �1 ■r-7 ■ _,..._...� Vey; � �■■■■■ '■,: - LE 11 I I Ilia �� aI C . =k 1 � f - ww 1100 Art AW WAR 1 _ , f' ,. •4 1 _ Rdy�h�iOR•'�. R�RR�ti reR�+� h44� Kr lk 'k n y • g i . ►A :� ® ..,. ■ A i wM . idiui - (II I L m t I Ni.Of 3... ■ mm ■ -owl Mom Ar Jill, NI IILI ill IIII � _ 1 i� littil �J pp i i 'TZST 006 STTO :uo sale0 auogdalal aseald aosinpe leool anofi grim 2upaw e a2ueaae 01 ao Juauajaedao leoiugoal sale0 pAA uoileilnsuoo ao}'fiaeagil anofi ao}aanleaalil}o Jas jjn}e}o fiaaniIap 32ueaae of Jewa04 bpd ui pailddns uaaq sey ainTeaaiq siyl Y papos as is 8 2ulpeqs ae o lS CD r 0^0 CD 1Y. f i M1^y Y 1t� t •�s^ i ■ 11lll■ W losses as R i The Impact-Resistant Italian Windows and Doors that not Only Give Protection to Your Home, but also Style and Elegance Whs s '< m s. r = a Finestra windows and doors are designed to saris the discriminating taste of building professionals and homeowners who demand high-quality windows and doors.To ensure this,our products offer top-of-the- linecomponents. With our impact-resistant windows and doors you will have full-time protection against high winds and flying debris without the use of shutters. La Finestra windows and doors were designed in Italy, and are proudly crafted in the USA.Skilled artisans build each window by hand to satisfy the different needs of our customers. As manufacturers, we take pride in our artisan production. We invite you to take a tour of our facility, where you can watch your windows and doors being made. Visit our website for more information wwwAafinestra.us AL t I ,I oNEs� 1111 1111 1111 0 �ti o w/NDOWS p �w S R �T Our hinges are made from stainless steel and extruded aluminum, which makes them resistant to rust and corrosion. The hinges are designed to be easily adjustable. In addition, the hinge is lubricated with a nylon bushing, which allows the heaviest sash with a 7,16'plate glass to be moved with a single finger. I1 i O Four different EPDM 'R gaskets are used to improve the window and door insulation against weather F extremes. I 1 P R u W y i w +ilk v `4v5ii .� t 9 r, c I �1 La Finestra A Synonym for Elegance. �ti i �\NEST �P 1p 1111 9,� o W/NppvJS i 'k t Custom Design to Express Your , e- Taste and Meet Your Needs 0 I Mi w.. rte. 3 ■ � y a �_ N PF\N EST' 111 1111 1111 IV/NDOWS V t 7 The Windows and Doors that << A will Add Beauty t` & Richness to = •� r r � Your Home ide> E 1 ,', • .' / - 1 ' w, V� r:. �3 ,r Orr » r' ' ;.. X .fir.. -. 7 11 e 1. G ; MU 103 Of Ir"I' j Wlll lc .p_4i 4++1�l��MA�,4F., x _ s � 0 .A � w La Fine"stra The Trouble-Free Hurrrcane y� o N�,�,,�5 that Converts Your Home in the Safest Refug w� La Finestra "s Unique Features Our multi-locking systems are designed for your home's Each piece is cut with laser-like precision.Joints and angles protection. The unique four to ten point closure system are imperceptible. Pieces are joined with internal sprung assures a complete hermetic seal against weather stainless steel pins,in contrast to traditional screwed or bolted inclemency, dust, burglars, and noise (it results in connections. approximatelya 34 db drop in outside ambient noise. -------------------- You can upgrade our product by selecting a Mahogany Wood interior that adds warmth and luxury to any home. Other types of wood are available upon request We offer practical and elegant Roll-up Mosquito Screens that hide when not in use. Our Double Windows and Doors have no We offer three standard colors of aluminum: mullion in sight, Antique White, Hunter Green and providing an Hammered Copper. We also have a special unrestricted view. wood grain color that fully resembles real wood due to its curing process. �. i pp - y ; Ow — —-- �` t, MW b r1, .j. ..'• 111 1111 1111 0 sti o /N D O'N 7620 N.W. 25 Street, Unit 6 Miami, Florida 33122 Phone: 305-599-8093 Fax: 305-592-4671 Email: info @lafinestra.us www.lafinestra.us appal wolsnD aay saooa '? snnopui/y\ ino4o iiy Property Information Map Page 1 of 1 My Home Miami-Dade County, Florida MIAMI- Property Information Map Summary Details: 65Ti15T yf 65TH 5T Folio No.: 09-4026-008-0060 Property: 835 SW 67 ST Mailing CSM REAL ESTATE LLC Address: 5537 SARDINA ST CORAL _ GABLES FL �I 33146-2647 Property Information: Primary Zone: 300 ESTATE Sw 66TH 5T RESIDENTIAL CLUC: 0081 VACANT LAND Beds/Baths: 0/0 Floors: 0 Livina Units: 0 d'Sq Footage: 10 Lot Size: 49,005 SQ FT .5W 67TH S Year Built: 0 26 54 40 1.125 AC NELSON HOMESITES PB 39-57 W161 FT OF Legal TR 6 PER W/P#20818 Description: OR 18579-1365 0499 2 COC 25990-2088 10 007 2 OR 25990-2088 1100702 sw 68TH 5T'. Sale Information: Sale O/R: 5990-2088 Sale Date: 10/2007 $yp 68TH T€R Sale Amount: $1,250,000 Digital Orthophotography-2007 0 131 ft Assessment Information: Year: 2008 2007 This map was created on 7/9/2009 11:06:19 AM for reference purposes only. Land Value: $640,395 $640,395 Web Site©2002 Miami-Dade County.All rights reserved. Building Value: $0 $0 Market Value: $640,395 $640,395 Assessed Value: $640,395 $640,395 Exemption Information: ear: 1 2008 1 2007 lAgricultural: 1 $0 638,145 Taxable Value Information: Year: 2008 2007 Applied Applied Taxing Authority: Exemption/ Exemption/ Taxable Taxable Value: Value: Regional: $0/$640,395 $638145/ $2,250 County: $0/$640,395 $638145/ $2,250 City: $0/$640,395 $63 $2,2250 50 School Board: $0/$6401 395 $6381145/ $2,250 http://gisims2.miamidade.gov/myhome/printmap.asp?mapurl=http://gi sims2.miamidade.gov... 7/9/2009 Curves and Slopes Dales have been providing curved fascias,soffits and gutters for many years and are able to turn this expertise to good use in the solar shade division. Curves may be pure radius,a series of facets or a bit of both combined.As a rule of thumb the hollow aerofoil blades are best installed in straight lengths as having them curved is very,very,expensive.However, curving the front fascia of faceted units can be a good compromise i 1 i. Surface Finishes The most popular finish for aluminium products is Polyester Powder Coating which is available in many RAL and BS colours.Dales coating is provided to BS6496 Anodised and PVF2 are also readily available options. Mill finish aluminium is not advised as surfaces will oxidise over time and may not display a consistent patina. i Additional Options The preceding information applies specifically to aluminium but there are other options. Western Red Cedar and Oak Blades With cedar cladding becoming so popular the inclusion of timber , blades brings continuity to the buildings appearance.Supported on unobtrusive brackets. d , For more information and design assistance phone us on: 0115 930 1521 DALES or e-mail us on:techinfo @dales-eaves.co.uk ( Dales service... ...Continuing a 30 year commitment to provide aluminium building products where quality and attention to detail are foremost. 5 Field sales Dales cover the UK with an experienced sales team who will attend architects and engineers premises to discuss and advise upon project applications. Project managers In house team provide preliminary scheme information such as loadings, cost options and surface finishes. It is customary for a project manager to work on a project from receipt to completion.CAD drawings are readily exchanged in order to refine details. Design activities are underwritten by Professional Indemnity Insurance In house design and assembly Dales design and manufacture within a BS EN 9001 compliant environment and have full design indemnity insurance cover. Extruded aluminium components are sourced from re-cycled material wherever possible. Most installations come to site pre-assembled on dedicated transport. Preferred installer network ! With pre-assembled,tailor made units the fitting is not expected to be beyond the capability of roofing and cladding trades but Dales do maintain their preferred installer list and such installers will be happy to price the work on a competitive basis. MEL M, CCase Studies Retrofit 1 50m Shadex Two banks of horizontal Shadex 150 solar shading were introduced onto the South facing facade of an existing public building where occupants had complained about excessive overheating. .•''� Installation took place outside of office hours,keeping disruption to a minimum. Occupants report significant reductions in overheating problems. Fitted as Part of a Dales Integrated Eaves System A combination of inclined shading and vertical shading lu - incorporated into the eaves was installed on this large college building. = -~ The vertical shading to the South facade provides a good level of protection,whilst the inclined shading over the glazed atrium is,in the most part,decorative. + Fixed to cladding and curtain walling With obscured glazing to all but the top levels,a reasonable level of solar shading was provided with relatively short overhangs. _� s Fixed to curtain walling using flitch plates and through cladding to primary steel,using the two stage fixing approach,the solar I y shading to this mixed use commercial building is both functional and highly decorative. 4rI ` ', Project Gallery r E. For more information and design assistance phone us on: 0115 930 1521 or e-mail us on. techinfo @dales-eaves.co.uk Why use Dales ? • 30 Years of design and manufacturing experience • Engineering led company ethos. • ISO 9001 Quality Assurance / • Technical support services: techinfo @dales-eaves.co.uk • Specification on demand ` • Design team and technical advisers in the field • Preferred installer network Primary Function Summer Sunlight 0 601,b of x Optimum protection overhangs exceeding 60%will provide The sun's rays playing directly at.6o4 of the g g p window height. little additional protection and are likely to upon a clear glazed surface r reduce daylight to a point where artificial lighting will be needed,which increases will allow solar gain to i the carbon footprint.In winter such an penetrate the interior of a I Winter Sunlight installation will allow lower sun to reach P Lower sun providing the interior space and provide welcome building and create varying I welcome light and some heat. light and some heat also. levels of discomfort within. On a south facing fagade a _r;, If solar shades are =6= ' installed individually above horizontal solar shade/ brise ;o, each window the sun's soleil projecting a distance arcing trajectory will allow rays to penetrate that is approximately 60% of 1 diagonally and therefore the window height provides Tracking it is advisable to have Sunlight continuous runs of optimum protection. Installed individually shading or allow adequate P P I above each window Plan View overlap width. NB:Dales systems are not motorised. System Options • Cantilevered: Functional or Decorative.Fixed directly to masonry,steel,concrete or timber.With or without braces and stays. • Vertically hung:Generally functional.Within window reveals or fixed to masonry,steel,concrete or timber. • Incorporated with an Eaves System: Supported either vertically or horizontally. ; ' • Angled Inclination on Stays: Utilised to shield atrium entrances and to act as a feature. • Principally Decorative:Generally large blades to form fagade feature. C fixing method summary Face fixed directly to masonry D 9 Expanding bolt or Resin/Chemical anchors depending upon masonry type and loading values. To structural steel through cladding - option 1 Two stage fixing process with primary bracket installed prior to cladding. To structural steel / cladding - option 2 surface fixed Single stage fixing process secured to steel through cladding using'bobbins'to prevent crushing. To Curtain Walling By consultation with the Curtain Walling supplier the solar " shades can be secured using an aluminium flitch plate fixed ;A to the mullions. I Struts, Ties and Stays Where loadings dictate or simply for aesthetics struts or ties can be introduced. 0 Corners Corner sections are generally factory made and will require a special bracket to support the increased span. Alternative Configuration Vertically hung over window opening Solar shading can be hung vertically over windows,however,consideration should be given to future access to windows for cleaning purposes and maintenance. Extended brackets can be used to offset the shade from the face of the building ` allowing access behind. Light shelving for = _ deep rooms Light shelves can be introduced to help natural daylighting to reach the back of rooms. These are of particular use when the rooms are deep and narrow. a Ind Incorporated with an eaves system The overhang of a roof can provide some protection where the windows are in close vertical proximity. ___ This protection can be enhanced by the introduction of horizontal or vertical louvres. Inclined at an angle * s Solar shades are generally inclined at an angle for aesthetic rather than functional reasons. RAMON PACHECO architect&planner , PROPERTY 6838 SW 67th ST 6838 SW 67th ST TO THE WEST ENTRY GATE LOT AREA Y d ,,::$!^ A a.M1"' .•� ,:. _ ___ _ ____ _ .. iii=w'1M 1' w u. t PROPERTY PROPERTY TO THE EAST TO THE EAST ENTRY GATE LOT AREA IMF 1_ r 67th ST WEST VIEW 67th ST EAST VIEW PROPERTY TO SOUTH PROPERTY TO SOUTH WEST EAST MELGOZA RESIDENCE 6835 SW 67th ST , SOUTH MIAMI FL. VOW01d'A.LNnoo gQyQ_1L Tj S(1H003d onand 3Hl d0 � „ z LS 39Vd 1V 6£ )10091V1d NI 0302!0032!SV d03213H1 iV-ld 3Hl Ol JNIOi1000V L w NOISIAIOBnS SB,LISaNOH NOSTBN d0• m 9 IDVUI 30 Z8H3 19T IS :N0IldIU0S30IV031 rn M �r1 LIM ON n '�iNVdIWOO 8ONV2IIISNI BZLIS NVOI2IaWV Is CD`'9'd U °c IL cc `ZHIIOIUa0U 4 NVIIWVQ `UHNM `NOIWO`IVS `-cvT££ "L3 `IKVIK HZIIOS "ZS HZL9 WS z xt L� c1 5£89 `IIWVdIW00 uIaigvIq QHZIIWI'I VQIx0 I3 V `*D I I `HZVZSB IVa IWSO OZ Q3I3IZ2I80 m iI J ui 1 Ln 00 O S.W. 65th STREET U) > o ,o m 6p e 2 r O c M t Om z W T12 T11 W a o LL L) . o > T10 T9 > A w X 3 4 z r� 0 0. ° Q ° z O W A N a, m LL, x c�c m U I^ _ G C 2i 3 44 c 9 F-1 of O v � a v U) U 0 T5 T6 T7 TS z w zU U z O Q LU cn v" cn H m w ui cq -S-W. 67th STREET m Dc Q !I. w N p U MANGO OAK H. O c.) 0 a 0 D=1. D=1.0' w E� in Z N � _ z H=20' 161.00' R & M H=za co O O �. S=50' ( ) S=15' ° F.I.P. 1/2" " 00 N FENCE o (NO ID.) 0 _i O ` ° POOLE C O Z H °0 W 80'CL M a��i 5 0 P.V.C. FENCE a J' 1-1 O 9B, ui " o, ti p3 v�~D O=A1 K.0 5' J � � / `l r H W `�•� W c.m !0 v aJ E ROYAL POINCIANA o c O L MANGO PALM D=3' r., z z a:3 - m o j O X�N � u D-2 D H=35' >7°o H=25' H=10' S=40' < H Q 5=20' 5=5. U . Z ZU0 Q - E 7 x 4zz OAK t-1 r. �W o o m 0 D=1.0' 0 LL O H c IJi H=20 S=15' ' \ m wL `H=P0 :3 � S=15' q OI > OHO E o 5'WOOD FENC }.s w e m m C F-Q ( a N E� A O HdFlu -o. (9U) z W tY S U N c 0 c w La a0� � Z � MANGO W W H H y U T n c° o a`� rD ANGO W D=2' H cn PG U) im E-0 N rn =2.5' H=25' W w co ° m o =25' S=20'' W m Q.i> . aN S=20' _ °v O«°t o n Y m cn cn F- m m 1 25 v 1L% �• Z W w LL w > - OAK w O J z cn O °' D=1.5' a a. ¢ c wf-„;U-ja,c?0 z -m ° - -c6.0 L.1. LU H=20' z a ¢ Q �Z L'-L1•Z>Z 5-15 1j w Z-ZOpZNOO WWWED U a } x m 2W.:5 7C00W ¢ F g cn W U Q U Z 0'- v F LL W WQ>-Qw-Qz :F w U Q N W F-wm0mF-(D w ui O ? rr) US 1-U0p>-LL.ZLY `� ^ N ,� cwi . 9 Z LL w Op>ZWO-p Q !! C F LL �, a , �waOWOmO� n c?2S p A 5 LL� OAK 5 J > a c w c U C 4 Q p ~ O Q M� H=20' 0. o o v o 0 ,, >U�,QooVY� .� S=15' OAK H=20' O OAK U, °° ~O=a m m 0Y W co D=1.5' S=15' r D=1.5' Q z L” ¢ Z ZF LYW O�m oo H=20' ui w z z � U w a O LE H=20' d' Z p w u -1 N M U Q W F- Q O S-15 M S-15 o z W ul OUZF=C7> LL M �'' c w t JW.JOZZN= O a LL w = Q ~Q.Q-OOujJ W O ca a m \y ~aOQW ZOJ D 20 `a w ¢ rn LL Q w> J o z = Z M O�J�QO>"� ui ° a w O w O Z V W U W LL Q�. 0 11 OZ w a! o W w d LY to Z>- LL Y x :t -gym O�UOLL2afF- ai Z z ° O ° W A O>�QO LL=El'F Z ¢ n F a d W Q v Z x g ui U� UaF- F..w LL ° z wNZO=>'> Ua O O 0r U W m F- w ' ~ W F >~LQ'a 0 � W o UZI}-OWDO2U OAK D a oQo = Q- d W J Z U Z a {ui SUm(n UFLL= W H=20' OAK W a o = o U�QF 0=QOC9 W r 5=15 D=1.5' yr % r v w {� WQJW ~ ZZ /Y H=20' 0 a cwci w p 1! �EQ2�O�OU W S=15' m a o 0 i to 000_U61?tYZ_� Q F w Q w o -u-LntmOn•2w w z o W ¢ �Qcqw =OQQ ZO 6 o a ui cn,LwiUwUaXr 0 \% (/) o I c9 wOOZOI-0- cn t z r O Z F ��W20<a<i Z ZW 00 w w O Mga_ Z�a0=) W PINE Ov m w ¢ a u :0 U>ZQZ=Z� 4.S D=1.0' - F•� ¢ ¢ ang�gW U0m0001-0_Z H=15' �O y Z w �cwi5"" owmq�-ip,�W C9 S=1S �j w j yz}mac }-WC9QUUQ� a� z _ G LL LLz�W w�d'd'_U�Q�� LY 0� m .. w O°oU� > ww~~~OF- Q 1�. 9 � o O o z �0>OLYCnZ K ROYAL POINCIANA eso• Q a i Z, g o t o g W Q 00>>LY OU Z Z m OAK "ab D=0.80' -s 20.00' D=1.5' o� H=20' 0.60'CL 4' H=20'_ S=15'.°o P.V.C. FENCE S=20' °o F.LP. 1/2" F (NO ID.) F.I.P. 1/2" 6 IR N EN E w NO ID. LU BLOCK 13.0' 19.0' 26.0' O(n (1 CORNER 314.60'1 BRICK U °o 2- O f!] 25.0' 15'PARKWAY 161.00'( R & M ) N N w O O h H ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:............................................................................................................... w } 00 W H , �L7........ ...................................................... . ::. ..................................................................... � Z 1.1.1 20'ASPHALT PAVEMENT is rr:i•}::•r::r:r:i:'r:•:i•rrr::i:::�:•rr:•iir:r:•rr:rr:i•rr:•i:irrr:i•:•:r:{•r:{•:i::•::•:ri�'66': O :•.... 1 ........:::::::::::::::::::::::. .:: :::::::................................. .....::::::::::::..::::::::::.:�:.�::::::::::.�.::�:::::::::::::::.�.�.. 3 ... ��N/ PN4 > ..N... 1 .. W'✓ :...........:. :. 0 E W (50'TOTAL R/W):;:;:;:::::::::,::: ::.:.: ®gyp > cn P4 W :. S�W. 67th STREET '- - °w Eli I, a zz ORLANDO COMAS, A.S.L.A. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 7428 SW 48TH STREET MIAMI, FL.,33155 (305)264-3841 LICENSE#LA1565 OCOMAS @BELLSOUTH.NET V.-r.:H:. ri .:1 .- AHC,H: EC.T