Res No 060-19-15332RESOLUTION NO.: 60-19-15332
A Resolution of the Mayor and City Commissioners of the City of South Miami
authorizing the payment of attorney fees related to the City of South Miami,
et al. vs. Carlos Rodriguez case.
WHEREAS, in 2013, a former employee, Carlos Rodriguez, was upset about the
termination of his employment and he made credible threats on the life of the City's police chief,
a City police major, as well all African -Americans. Consequently, the City Manager was
concerned that Mr. Rodriguez posed a credible threat to all the City employees who were involved
in the termination process and the City of South Miami filed a suit against officer Carlos
Rodriguez (Miami -Dade County Case No.: 13-12254 CA 15) seeking an injunction. The
injunction was granted and it prevented Mr. Rodriguez from going within 500 feet of the named
City employees; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Rodriguez made a second credible threat on the life of the police chief
and the City police major that was communicated by a third -party letter to them; and
WHEREAS, initially, a large cache of weapons and ammunition was allegedly confiscated
from Mr. Rodriguez's home; and
WHEREAS, subsequently, another cache of Mr. Rodriguez' weapons were allegedly
confiscated from Mr. Rodriguez' parent's house where they were being stored by him; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Rodriguez allegedly assaulted another police officer from another
jurisdiction and was arrested; and
WHEREAS, approximately 18 months later, after Mr. Rodriguez was released from
custody, he filed a motion to have the City's injunction dissolved, claiming that he is stable and
taking medication; and
WHEREAS, discovery was requested of his medical records which Mr. Rodriguez
opposed by way of a motion for a protective order; and
WHEREAS, the trail judge, the Honorable Jose Rodriguez, granted the motion to compel
discovery and denied Mr. Rodriguez' motion for protective order; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Rodriguez filed an appeal and the appellate court reversed Judge
Rodriguez's order and granted the protective order; and
WHEREAS, the rules of civil procedure provide for attorney fees if a protective order is
granted; and
WHEREAS, a reasonable fee has been negotiated with Mr. Rodriguez's attorney and the
City Commission desires to settle the claim for attorney fees. Payment shall be made from account
number 001-1330-513-4510, Liability Insurance, with a current balance of $69,007.
Page 1 of 2
Resolution No. 60-19-1'5332'
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA THAT:
Section 1. The City Manager is authorized to pay the sum of $11,000 to Mr. Rodriguez's
attorney, Juan Berrio.
Section 2: Severability. If any section, clause, sentence, or phrase of this resolution is for
any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, the holding shall
not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this resolution.
Section 3. Effective Date: This resolution shall be effective immediately upon its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7 th day of May, 2019.
ATTEST:
L{
City CIA
READ AND ROVED AS TO FORM
LANGVAULZIEGALM AND EXECUTION
COMMISSION VOTE: 5-0
Mayor Stoddard:
Vice Mayor Hams:
Yea
Yea
Commissioner Welsh:
Commissioner Liebman:
Yea
Commissioner Gil:
Yea
Yea
Page 2 of 2
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE
This Settlement Agreement and Release (the "Settlement Agreement") is made and
entered into on this lt� day of ODA- 2019, by and between Juan Berrio ("Berrio'),
Carlos Rodriguez ("Rodriguez"), and the City of South Miami, including its past and present
employees and officers named in the Lawsuit and collectively referred to as "the City". Berrio,
Rodriguez and the City shall be collectively referred to as the "Parties". The Settlement
Agreement is effective as of the date that the Settlement Agreement is fully executed by all
Parties.
WHEREAS, the City filed an action for injunctive relief on April 8, 2013 against
Rodriguez styled City of South Miami, Orlando Martinez de Castro, Rene Landa,-Dr. Hector
Mirabile, Latasha Nickle, Gemma Boza, Ruben Rodriguez, Jeff Griffin, Thomas Pepe And Steven
Alexander vs. Carlos Rodriguez, Case No. 13-12254 CA 15 (the "Lawsuit"); and
WHEREAS, on March 17, 2017, Rodriguez filed a motion to have the City's injunction
dissolved, claiming that it failed to state a claim for which relief could be granted and that he was
stable and taking his medication; and
WHEREAS, on March 14, 2017, discovery was requested of Rodriguez's medical records
and condition and, on June 8, 2017, the City filed a motion to compel which Rodriguez opposed
by way of a motion for a protective order; and
WHEREAS, on September 29, 2017, the trial judge, the Honorable Jose Rodriguez,
granted the motion to compel discovery and denied Mr. Rodriguez's motion for protective order;
and
WHEREAS, on October 18, 2017, Rodriguez filed an appeal and, on May 9, 2018, the
appellate court reversed Judge Rodriguez's order and granted the protective order; And -
WHEREAS, Rule 1.380(a)(4) provides for attorney. fees under certain circumstances
where a motion for protective order is granted; and
WHEREAS, the Parties, without any admission or representation as to liability, wish to
resolve their differences solely regarding the protective order discovery dispute in the trial court.
WHEREAS, a reasonable fee has been negotiated with Mr. Rodriguez's attorney with
regards to the protective order discovery dispute in the trial court and the City desires to settle the
claim for attorney fees.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the mutual
promises, forbearances, covenants and agreements contained herein, and other good and valuable
consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as
follows:
1. All of the foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by
reference.
2. The Parties agree as follows:
a. The City shall pay to Berrio and Rodriguez the total sum of Eleven
Thousand Dollars and 00/100 ($11,000.00) (the "Settlement Funds" or "Settlement
Amount") made payable to Juan Berrio Trust Account within thirty (30) days of
executing this Settlement Agreement.
b. The Parties expressly acknowledge and agree that the Settlement Funds is made in
satisfaction of any and all claims regarding the protective order discovery dispute in the trial court
which were raised, or could or should have been raised with regard to the discovery requested by
the City, the motion to compel discover, the production of medical records, the motion for
protective order, the motion for attorney fees as it may relate to any of the above actions in the
Lawsuit, including those based on Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.525, 1.280(c), 1.380(a)(4)
and Florida Statute §57.105, whether known or unknown, including without limitation, for
Plaintiff's attorneys' fees, court costs, associated expenses, general releases, damage claims, if
any, and any and all other claims relating to the motion or motions for protective order and
concerning Rodriguez's medical records and medical treatment.
C. The Parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees, expert fees, consultant fees,
accounting fees, filing fees, and any other types of fees, and all costs, whether taxable or non-
taxable, including any and all fees and costs incurred in connection with the motion for attorney
fees that are related to the protective order discovery dispute at the trial court level and the
negotiation and preparation of this Settlement Agreement.
d. Nothing contained within this Settlement Agreement can be used as an admission
or non -admission of liability nor can anything contained within this Settlement Agreement be
used for any other purpose, including but not limited to entering the Settlement Agreement into
evidence in the Lawsuit.
3. Rodriguez and Berrio hereby release and discharge the City, and each of its
assigns, heirs, successors and predecessors in interest, employees and former employees,
officers, and officials, agents, attorneys, appellate attorneys, and insurers, of and from any and all
actions of any nature, suits, claims, extra -contractual claims, claims for fraud, claims for bad
faith, unfair claims handling practices, claims for subrogation, contracts, demands, fees, costs,
expenses, losses, damages, liabilities or causes of action, whether in law or equity, known or
unknown, accrued and unaccrued, including without limitation that are derived from, based
upon, or arising out of the medical discovery requested by the City, the motion to compel
discovery, the production of medical records, the motion for protective order, the motion for
57.105 attorney fees as it may relate to any of the above discovery dispute actions in the Lawsuit.
4. Nothing in Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of the Settlement Agreement should be
construed to limit the Parties' rights to enforce the terms of this Settlement Agreement.
5. This Agreement is executed in the State of Florida and shall be construed and
interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida.
6. By executing this Settlement Agreement, the Parties represent that each has fully
reviewed and understands the contents of this Settlement Agreement, has had advice of counsel
regarding the contents and legal effect of this Settlement Agreement, and is not relying on the
representations of any other party or the attorneys for the other parties in executing this
Settlement Agreement. The Parties entered into this Settlement Agreement under their own free
will and accord and agree to be fully bound by the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
7. Each of the Parties warrant and represent that they have the authority to enter into
this Settlement Agreement and they have not wholly or partially assigned, sold, or transferred
any right, action, or obligation made part of this Settlement Agreement.
8. No modification, waiver, amendment, discharge, or change of this Settlement
Agreement shall be valid, unless the same is in writing and signed by the party against which the
enforcement of such modification, waiver, amendment, discharge; or change is sought.
9. This Settlement Agreement contains the entire agreement between the Parties
hereto relating to the transactions contemplated by this Settlement Agreement. It supersedes any
and all prior or contemporaneous contracts, agreements, understandings, conversations,
conditions, representations, settlements, promises, guaranties, and obligations, oral or written,
between them on the subjects covered in this Settlement Agreement which is limited to
Respondent's attorneys fees and costs for the protective order discovery dispute in the trial court
only.
10. If any term or provision of this Settlement Agreement, or the application thereof
to any party or circumstances shall, to any extent, be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the
remainder of this Settlement Agreement, or the application of such term or provision to parties or
circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, shall not
be affected thereby, and each term and provision of this Settlement Agreement shall be valid and
enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.
11. The representations, covenants, and agreements of the Parties made in this
Settlement Agreement shall remain operative and survive the execution and delivery hereof.
12. This Settlement Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and
by faxed or e-mailed copies, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall
constitutea. single instrument.
13. All Parties agree to cooperate fully and to execute any and all supplementary
documents and to take all additional actions that may be necessary or appropriate to give full
force and effect to the basic terms and intent of this Settlement Agreement and which are not
inconsistent with its terms.
14. This Settlement Agreement and all executed supplementary documents
referenced in the foregoing paragraph shall be binding upon the Parties, their heirs, successors
and/or assigns.
15. This Settlement Agreement is entered into by the Parties for the purpose of only
settling and compromising the protective order discovery dispute in the trial court and does not
constitute an admission by the Parties hereto of any wrongdoing or liability regarding said
discovery dispute.
16. Each Party shall use its best efforts to expeditiously comply with all of the terms
and conditions of this Settlement Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, have executed this Contract, on or before the
date first above written, with full knowledge of its content and significance and intending to be
legally bound by the tenns hereof.
Carlos Rodriguez
Witness
By.r--
Juan Beeno
Wi sx
Y
666 2
By _ 0'
j'i5� b-�
ATTESTED:
By: N -�
Nkeng A. Payne, CMC
City Clerk
Read and Approved as to Form, Language,
Legality and Execution Thereof:
City Attorney
CITY OF SOUTH MI I
By: A
/, q ✓Steven Alexander
� CityManager