6075 SW 64 ST_EB-96-008 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
Building,Zoning and Community Development
Revenue
Code Classification Amount
322100 Permits
341910 Reinspection Fees
321100 Occupational.License - Renewal
321200 Occupational License a New
329100 Penalties on Occupational License
341930 Certificates of Use/Occupancy
341940 Code Enforcement Fines
322200 County Code Compliance Fee
341900 State Radon Fee
341200 Planning Division and Public Hearing Fee
GO-
341300 RPB Dumpster/Temporary Sign /Tree Permits
341400 Microfilm
369920 Miscellaneous: Maps, Copies, etc.
P
o
Date: _j TOTAL, $
S�'_,_` ....- - -.✓`airy T 0 ri?_.
'I
ORDINANCE NO. 3-99- 1677
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO AN AMENDMENT
OF SECTION 20-9 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO INCLUDE
THOSE PARCELS LEGALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN WITHIN THE
COMMUNITY SERVICE OVERLAY DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, in July of 1994 , the community gathered together to
set forth a plan for the Charrette Too Study Area; and,
WHEREAS, the existing semi-public, community-based service
provider facilities, such as churches, mosques, synagogues and
temples, were addressed in the Charrette Too Study as follows :
Public buildings are instrumental in creating civic pride. The
public buildings of the community (and their grounds) should be
welcoming, confident, and well-maintained. The architectural
design and siting needs to reflect their permanence and importance
to the community.... Civic building sites should be permanently
designated, not considered "non-conforming uses. " For example,
churches should be treated by the regulations as permanent public
institutions.
and;
WHEREAS, on February 18, 1997, the Mayor and City Commission
voted to create a Community Service Overlay District in order to
permit parking lots, out parcels, day care centers and additions
on those properties under the sole ownership of community-based
service providers, such as churches, mosques, synagogues or
temples; and,
WHEREAS, on February 2, 1998, Mount Nebo Church, a
community-based service provider, attained additional properties
within the Charrette Too Study Area and "RS-4, " "Single Family
Residential" zoning district from Miami-&de County, which are
legally described as follows :
East 50 feet of West 200 feet of North 105.50 feet of East % of
Northwest % of Southeast % Less Streets, Section 25-54-40, Dade
County, Florida, and,
East 50 feet of West 150 feet of North 105.50 feet of East % of
Community Services Overlay Ordinance: 2 nd Reading November 3, 1998 1
Page 2 of Ordinance .,n . :'-G'q- 1677
Northwest % of Southeast % Less Streets, Section 25-54-40, Dade
County, Florida; and,
East 50 feet of West 100 feet of North 105.50 feet of East % of
Northwest % of Southeast % Less Streets, Section 25-54-40, Dade
County, Florida; and,
West 50 feet of North 105.50 feet of East % of Northwest % of
Southeast % Less Streets, Section 25-54-40, Dade County, Florida;
and,
WHEREAS, Mount Nebo Church attained said properties in order
to provide additional community-oriented services to the
community; and,
WHEREAS, On October 13 , 1998, the Planning Board voted 6-0
to recommend approval of the ordinance; and,
WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission find that it is in
the public interest to include said properties in the Community
Service Overlay District in order to allow Mount Nebo Church to
provide additional services to the surrounding community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1 . Section 20-9 .3 , entitled "Boundaries, " is amended
to include the subject properties, as set forth in "Exhibit A, "
which is attached hereto.
Section 2 . Figure 20-9 . 1 is amended to include the subject
properties, as depicted in "Exhibit B, " which is attached hereto.
Section 3 . If any section, clause, sentence, or phrase of
this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional
by a court of competent jurisdiction, the holding shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance.
Section 4 . In the event of any conflict between this
ordinance and prior ordinances or resolutions, this ordinance
shall govern.
Section 5 . This ordinance shall take effect immediately at
the time of its passage.
Community Services Overlay Ordinance: 2°d Reading November 3, 1998 2
Page 3 of Ordinance No . 3-99- 1577
PASSED AND ADOPTED this19thday of January 1999 ,
ATTEST: APPROVED:
CITY CLERK MAYOR
COMMISSION VOTE : 5-0
Mayor Robaina : Yea
READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: Vice Mayor Oliveros : Yea
Commissioner Bethel : Yea
Commissioner Feliu : Yea
Commissioner Russell : Yea
CITY ATTORNEY
c:\ ._ \ ldc \ C2-overlay-Ord Amendment.doc
Community Services Overlay Ordinance: 2 nd Reading November 3, 1998 3
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor and City Commission Date: January 14, 1999
Agenda Item #
From: Charles D. Scurr Re: Comm. Mtg. 01/19/99
City Manager Community Service Overlay
REOUEST:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI.
FLORIDA, RELATING TO AN AMENDMENT OF SECTION 20-9 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT
CODE IN ORDER TO INCLUDE THOSE PROPERTIES LEGALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN WITHIN
THE COMMUNITY SERVICE OVERLAY DISTRICT: PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;
PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS:
On February 18. 1997. after input from the community. the Mayor & City Commission created
the Community Service Overlav District in order to provide for the special needs of community-
based service providers. Specifically, the district was created to permit parking lot
improvements. out-parcel development. day care center facilities and building additions for those
properties under the sole ownership of community-based service providers. such as churches.
mosques. synagogues. and temples.
On April 13. 1998. Pastor Emanuel Whipple of Mount Nebo Missionary Baptist Church
submitted a letter to the Planning & Zoning Department. requesting the City's review of
development plans for the church's property. The development plans included properties which
the church had purchased on February 2, 1998. from Miami-Dade County in order to provide an
educational facility for at-risk students. The properties are not in the Community Service
Overlay District and are currently zoned single family residential. The single-family residential
zoning district does not permit the church's proposed use.
The proposed ordinance would amend the Community Service Overlay District to include the
subject properties. allowing the subject properties to be developed pursuant to Section 20-9 of
the Land Development Code. As a result. the Church's request to locate a school facility on the
premises could be approved pursuant to the special use process.
On August 11. 1998. the Planning Board deferred review of the proposed ordinance in order to
allow Mount Nebo Church the opportunity to submit a site plan and other information. which
would better identify the anticipated development of the subject property.
The attached letter of intent explains that the proposed facility would be used for continuing the
education of"at-risk children." The classes would accommodate an estimated 75 children. and
various activities would operate between 7:30 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Overall. the proposal would
provide valuable services to the community and substantially improve vacant property; however,
it also presents two very important potential impacts to consider:
(1) The surrounding area is largely single family residential. The proposed school facility would
most likely generate more traffic and noise than single family residences.
(2) This request to expand the district is probably the first of several, as there are several other
properties in the area owned by community churches. The approval of this request may serve
as a precedent to future applicants, thereby, allowing the area to accommodate more intensive
permitted and special uses, such as churches, day care centers, aclfs. counseling services.
funeral homes. and schools. rather than the single family homes for which the underlying
zoning is intended. This shift in use is not necessarily negative; in fact. it could be a positive
development for the community. But, it is essential that the decision to approve or
disapprove be a conscious one.
In addition to the above potential impacts, it is important to note that (1) if a non-church were to
buy the subject properties, the subject properties could only be used as single-family residential
properties; (2) the proposed school use and any other "intensive" use, which requests to be
located in the District, would require special use approval; and (3) the Church has proposed to
utilize a"modular" building, which may or may not be compatible with City standards, however,
that aspect of the application will be considered as part of the special use application and
permitting process—not as part of this ordinance to amend the zoning district.
On October 13. 1998. the Planning Board voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the application.
The item has been deferred since November 3. 1998, in order to enable the City Commission and
the CRA Board to determine the CRA Board's role in the legislation of such matters.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
Attachments:
Proposed Ordinance
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
County_ Deed
Letter from Pastor Emanuel Whipple, dated April 1, 1998
Letter from Pastor Emanuel Whipple, dated September 14. 1998
Site plan
Minutes from 8/11/98 Planning Board Meeting
Minutes from 10/13/98 Planning Board Meeting
Exhibit A
20-9.3 Boundaries
The properties in the Community Service [CS] overlay zoning district are indicated as darkened
areas in Figure 20-9.1 (see attached) and are legally described as follows:
Lots 7, 8 and 12 of Block 1, PINES SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in
Plat Book 13 at Page 2 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida: and. Lots 31, 32 and 33
of Block 5, Lots 34, 35 and 36 of Block 6, and the alley lying between Lots 34 and 35, Lot 40,
less the west 15 feet thereof, Lots 41, 42, 43, 44, 45 and 46 of Block 7, and 4 feet of the alley
lying south and adjacent to Lot 46. Lots 70 and 71 of Block 12. and Lot 87 of Block 15 and 7'/
feet of the alley lying west and adjacent to Lot 87, less roadway dedications. FRANKLIN
SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 5 at Page 35 of the
Public Records of Dade Counry, Florida: and, Lots 1. 2, 3. 4, 5,6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 25, and 26,
RE-SUBDIVISION OF TOWNSITE OF LARKINS, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in
Plat Book 4 at Page 1 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida: and Lots 12, 13 and 14 of
Block 2, TOWNSITE OF LARKINS SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in
Plat Book 2 at Page 105 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; and, the North Y2 of Lot
5, Lots 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 of Block 2, and Lot 4 of Block 4, less roadway dedications,
AMENDED PLAT OF HAMLET. according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 4 at
Page 48 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida: and, East 50 feet of West 200 feet of
North 105.50 feet of East % of Northwest '/ of Southeast '/ Less Streets Section 25-54-40, Dade
County, Florida: and. East 50 feet of West 150 feet of North 105.50 feet of East % ofNorthwest
'/. o Southeast '/ Less Streets. Section 25-54-40 Dade County Florida• and East 50 feet of
West 100 feet of North 105.50 feet of East Y of Northwest '14 of Southeast '/ Less Streets Section
25-54-40, Dade Countv. Florida: and West 50 feet of North 105.50 feet of East '/ of Northwest
'/ of Southeast '/ Less Streets. Section 25-54-40 Dade County Florida
Exhibit B
J�.
..ate _. _ .. ..
I 1 1111111 =
TI $ Id.
• I L J . I iT
•YAyt{• �;••
�MSS• � ' �
. t
1
i
• 1
r
I P',
1 11 ITM
Y
awon
Lam.
FIGURE ZQ-9. 1
Orr
COUNTY DEED
98RC 48724 1998 FE$
THIS DEED , made this 2nd day of FEBRUA Y , 1998, by Miami- Dade
County ,Florida (fWa Metropolitan Dade County , Florida), a political subdivision of the State
of Florida. called"COUNTY"and DESTINY HUMAN S1 RVICES CORPORATION , of 6075
i
S.W. 64 Street , South Miami, Florida 33134, hereinafter c Illed"DEVEEOI ER".
WITNESS : That the COUNTY for and in consider tion of the sum of TEN DOLLARS
(S10.00), to it in hand paid by the DEVELOPER, receipt c f which is hereby. acknowledged has
granted, bargained and sold to the DEVELOPER, its heirs md its assigns, subject to the right of
reentry set forward below, the land lying and being in Dadi County, Florida':
DOCSTPM. E 0.00 BURTX
HARVEY tjtlVIN► CLERK DADE COL
See Exhibit "A" Legai Description ttached Hereto
i
i
This Deed conveys only the interests of Dade County and i s Board of Coun Commisioners in
the property described herein, and not warrant title therein
I . This Conveyance is made subject to the foil wing covenants �unning with the
land. and setting forth the right of reentry , o wit:
A. Developer will commence work on he Project improvements (the
I�
"Improvements"), as outlined and cribed in Schedule "A"attached
herein, and complete such improvements in accordance with Schedule
"Ate
1
REC. 1 1 965H 186
B. Promptly after completion or Improvements in accordance with
approved plans and provisions of t is Instrument. th,: County shall furnish
the Developer an appropriate Ins rurnent certifying to the satisfactory
completion of the Improvements. Such certificancrt shall be in a form
recordable in the Office of the Cleri of the Circuit Cc:urt of Dade County,
Florida.
C- The Developer agrees for itself, its successors and assigns, to or of the
Property or any part thereof. that Ihe Developer and such successors or
assigns shall:
Not discriminate upon the basis of race, culor, religion, sex or
national origin in the sale, lei se or rental or in the use or occupancy
I
of the property or any Im Yrovements erect,Id or to be erected
hereon or on any pan thereo and this covensit shall be binding to
the fullest extent
Permitted b r law and equity,'i'or the benefit and in
favor of, and enforceable by he County, its su ccessors and assigns.
and any successor in intemes to the property, or any part thereof.
The County shall have the right in the event iIf any breach of any
such covenants, to exercise all the rights avid remedies; and to
maintain any actions or suit at law or in equity or other proper
proceedings to enforce the diring of such bn!ach of covenant, to
which it or any other beneficiaries of such covenant may be
entitled.
Z
• OFF. '�
D. The Developer (or Successor in In -'rest), shall pay the real estate taxes or
assessments on the ro
p perry or any Dart thereof when:due. Developer shall
not suffer any levy or artachm t to be
fie•• or any material or
mechanic's lien, or any unauthoiLzed enctunbranc;e or lien to attach,
except:
I
a) Any most e s
gag ( ) to favor of any insutut;bnal lender for the
Purpose of financing any h ird costs or soft(costs relatin g to the
construction of the Improve merits in an amt unt(s) not to exceed
the value of the Improveme s as determined tl an
Y appraiser;and
b) Any mortgages) in favor any institutiorr+l lender refinancing
any mortgage of the charactf r described in ciiiuse (a) hereof; in an
amount(s) not to exceed he value of t} Improvements as
determined by an appraiser.
C) The recordation, together w th any mortgage, purporting to meet
the requirements of clauses( ) or(b) above, of la statement of value
by a Member of American Institute of Reid Estate Appraisers
C'MAI"), (or member of an e similar or successor organization),
stating the value of the Imp vements is a di to or
Q greater than
the amount of such mortgage(s), shall constitute conclusive
evidence that such mortgage neets such requiii ments, and that the
right of any reentry hereunder shall be subjec I t to and limited by,
and shall not defeat, render it alid, or limit in'any way, the lien of
I
such mortgage. For purpost s of this paragraph an "institutional
3 ,I
°": 1
Rf C. 17
lender .' shall mean i ny bank, saving, and loan association.
insurance company, f undation or othe charitable entity, real
estate or mortgage nvestment host pension funds, the
Federal National Mortgage Association agency of the United
States Government or other governmental agency.
E- Developer shall not transfer the IrOPerty or any part thereof without
consent of the County and shall nc t change the owt:ership or distribution
Of the stock of the Developer or w respect to the ideality of the parties
in control of the Developer or the d gree thereof. p
In the event the Developer shall violate or otherwise fail t4 o comply with an•i of the covenants set
forth herein or Schedule `A" attached herein, the evelo
per shall correct or cure the
dcfault/violation within thirty (30) days of notification of the default by the County. if
Developer fails to remedy the default within thirty (3 0) d Lys, the County shall have the right to
reenter and take possession of the property and to terming
i (and revest in t u County) the estate
i
conveyed by this Deed to the Developer, provided, that such right to re:ntty shall always be
subjected to and limited by, and shall not defeat, render invalid, or limit ir" any way the lien of
any valid mortgage or Deed or Trust permitted by this Dee .
,4_
KCB. 1 1 .lVV. r T
WrrNZ ESS WHEREOF, the said County has caused these presents to be executed in its
i
name by its Board of County Commissioners acting timugh the MayST, the day and year
aforesaid.
•i
Dade County Florida
By its Board f County Comm ssioners
By: a..
Mayor
• ',A • . Printed Sigaaurc of Mayor '
Stephen P. Clark Center
z K rn 111 N.W. 1St Strcct. 17th Floor
�J
as Miami. Florin 33128 !
ATTEST: ••'''�
Harvey Ruvin, CIerk of Circuit Court
By : I
D clerk Signature
By: �fiL�t-�-�► v Yuo
Deputy Cleric Printed Signature
Stephen P. Clark Center
I 11 N.W. 1st Street, Suite 210
Miami, Florida 33128
i
Prepared by: Sidney Beckom
Dade County Office of Community and
Economic Dcveiopment
140 West Hagler Street, Suite 1100 '
Miami,Florida 33130
;I
,I
5
°". i 7965PC 186
AEC.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF TRUSTEE,
ADMINISTRATOR, EXE--UTOR
GUARDIAN OR ANY PERSC N ACTING
j IN A REPRESENTATIVE C VACITY
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF DADE
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged me q�J
` N� ed bf this
s�_ 2 ( Q�t� by
ch1 who is personal1v known to me
or who has produced
as identification and who
did(did not) take an oath.
4 ,4,,,4-
Sigma ' of Person Taking eknowiedgmenr
Name - Print or Typed
i
Title or Rank
Serial Num
i
i
WITNESS, my hand and official seal.this t70 da of
�t 14 4v- A.D., 19 c7
t
� Notary Public, State Flori Large
1'7 ::;'=TH F. GULD RAND
Printed Signature of Notary
i
LQSrRN`��
My Commission expires ) rfM f GU
fl �
co
M
6
OPf.
Schedule
I. PARKING LOT
II. EDUCATION AND SENIOR C17 IMN FACII,M cS
i
I. Parking Lot '
I,
A parking lot shall be developed in accordance w' the City of souih M.
Construction Regulations. Construction of ' vements consist Miami Building and
��, lighting and fencing shall begin within h8 of asphalt paving,
and be completed within six (6)months from the s of3constructio n.m date of this Deed
The parking lot shall be developed on the followie g described '+
T
it y
Parse--- I I J.Lets 66 and 67, in Block 11,FRANK 2N SUBDMsii I
Plat Book 5, at Page 20,Dade County, Florida. t?N,as recorded in
Folio No.09-4025-010.0660 ,
I�
fie}12-?-Lot 68, in Block 1 I and 7.50 feet Alle ,Lying West anii Adjacent Closed per
R-92-1515.FRANKLIN SUBDIVISION,as recor led in Plat Book 3.at page 20,Dade
County,Florida. i
Folio No.09-4025-OIG-0670
Parcel 14-11-0 l.Lot 69,Block 12 and 7.50 fees
Per R-92-1515, �'I'�g East sold Adjacent Closed
SUBDIVISION, as riled in Plat Bi)ok 5,at Page 20,
Dade County,Florida
Folio No. 09-4025-01040680 - 6051 S.W. 64 S et �
II. Educational and Senior Citizen Facilities
The Educational Facility will offer such programs as child can, an After-School Tutorial
Program. a Youth Alternative Program for at-is' k students who have been suspended
from local schools, but would Me to continue academic 3tudid4, as well as receive
counseling. i
The Senior Citizen Program will provide daily hot ,recreationtl activities. adult care,
etc. ;
The design and construction of the facilities s begin within twit ty.four (24) months
from date of this Deed and be completed within -six (36) months from the start of
construction. 'Me improvements shall be upon the llowing prvpett
Page i of 2
Schedule"A" is �
Exhibit"A"
�-= ..Z U
Lots 66 and 67, in Block 11, FRANKLIN SUBDIVISION
20, Dade County, Florida. 'u, as recorded in Mat Book S, at Page
Folio No. 09_4025-010-0660
6001 S.W. 64 Street
Lot 68,in Block 11 and 7.50 felt Alley,LL 2Dac r
FRANKLIN SUBDIVISION, as recorr in Plat Book S,adjacent Page 0 County.Florida.
Folio No. 09.402.5-010-0670
I
I
i
+I
I
i
i
�I
�i
�I
i
I
i
�I
Ii
�i
i
I
i
i
Page Z of 2 i
Irgai eons - Fihi 't"A" i
1x12202t-A .
Legai Dcacripnon
Psse121-3
East 50 feet of West 200 feet o f North 105.50 feet of Eat ih of Northwest"A of Northwest '/, of
Southeast 'A Ltsa Streets,Section 25-54-40, Dade County Florida.
Folio No. 09.4023-000.0790
6048 S.W. 64 Street �
Parcel 71-4
East 50 feet of West 150 feet of North 105.50 feet of East of Northwest 4 of Northwest 1/a of
Southeast% Less Streets,Section 25.54-40, Dade County Florida
Folio No. 09-4025-000-0720
land
East 50 feet of West 100 feet of North 105.50 feet of East yi of Northwest of Northwest '/.s of
Southeast 'A,Section 25-54-40,Dade County,Florida. i
Folio No.09-4025-000.0900 I
Pa=21
I
West 50 feet of North 105.50 feet of East yi of Northwest 'A of Northwest 14 of Southeast 1/,
Section 25-54-40, Dade County,Florida. i
Folio No. 09-4025-000-0700
6096 S.W. 64 Street
I
P 1=1 14-11-01
Lot 69,in Block 12 and 7.50 feet Alley,Lying East and ac jacent Closed Pel!R-92-151 S,
FRANKLIN SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Plat Book 3,at Page 20, Da& County,Florida.
Folio 09-4025-010-0680
6051 S.W. 64 Street
Page i of 2
Legal Descriptions - 't"A" !
i
i
V N1r VY.rr Il - YNlI�V.GNfiV Page 2 AEC. 1 t JU•�I u '
Pnrr�z -
East 50 feet of West 200 feet of North 105.50 feet f East �i of Northwest 1/.of
Northwest " of Southeast y, Less Streets, Section -54-50.Dade('ounty,Florida.
Folio No.09-4025-000-0790
E=1 21-4
East 50 feet of West 150 feet of Notch 105.50 feet 2f East �j of Northwest /4 of
Northwest S4 of Southeast y,Less Street. Section 5.54-40; Dade County, Florida.
Folio No.09-4025-000-0720
Parcel 21-S_
East 50 feet of West 100 feet of North 105.50 feet f Ent%of Northwest'/. of
Northwest 'A of Southeast ", Section 25-54-40, D County,Flocl.ia,
Folio No.09-4025-000-0900
Parcel 21-6
West 50 feet of North 105.50 feet of East W of Northwest SG, of Northwest r/. of
Southeast %,Section 25-54-40.Dade County, Flcn'da.
Folio No.09-4025-000-0700
In the event that construction has not started n the Educational and Senior Citizen
Facilities prior to, or within twenty-four (24) mo hs from date of this County Deed. the
developer may erzct temporary facilities to ter programs described herein. The
duration of use of said facilities shall be in ac== with the Jega)ly allowed time period
pursuant to City of South Miami regulations. or mil adequate funding for construction
of permanent improvements have been secured, h=d ver comes first. but subject to the
following paragraph below.
If. after 7 years from the date of this County The Parking Lot and permanent
Education and Senior Citizen Improvements ve not been completed. the County
reserve: the right to reenter and take po n of the prope^'ty that has not been
developed in accordance with this County Deed.
ee,s�ro+•eMt�eeoreesaoor
as oast cowvrr.rtoww.
Page 2 of 2 NARVEY RUVIN
.ox/`Wcnur rouAt
Schedule "A'Improve acs
FACSIMIUE COVER SHE:
Aft Mae Mba%~y swa"c chowc*
mkft FE=111
i�lor�: a0T�9A
i
SL7VD rarwnrA t� prof iI
now
AAMOM - O
6 -cam
Q Q
COMPAWM i
i
i
I
i
A
E
i
f
l
September 14, 1
l
Mr.Gregory th J. Pl
City of Sou aaarr
6130 Sunset Driv
South Miami,FL 33143
Dear Mr.Ora
Attached you find a Schedule of the p1wn that we ha in rcgrds to thx) proposed use of the
land that is now t that is both South and East d the Mt.Nebo Missionuy Baptist t b=b,
located at 6073 S.W. 64th Street. cad If you have any questions regarding this matter,please call me at 667.3696.
Sinoaeiy,
l
Emanuel Whipp
President
I
I
j
i
The O rictaum tbat will be used is High Scope L niter,oae of wb&h is used for
Head Start ,
All =tous programs will be catered to a all over Dade-Cotmty however,
it is o be filled with childMU from the Sotith Miami Area bi>cause these is
such a for theae programs due to the fact thlt the Head Start Program is
a Fedws.113 Funded Pfor m for Low Iacome FamMos.
The fwak as are expected to be udlited from 7:30 aj=to 4:00 p.m.
we are als onakiag saaaactments to lease the build that wfII be slat of the C�ch
for aaotho�youth project to accomodato the South Mimi Academy f cc a project that
�'e ad dmough the Department of J6venilo Justice dMit is in need of
Spam that amsist of two classrooms to aeoomods (M chtUmt,Teacbers sod
and Ad ' native Offices. 'Deis funding wM bo ooattiag directly through the(qty
of South
if the f is net utilized as stated above the arm be udlize�for sdditlmal
edu programs and Adminlstmtive Offiam
The,O&UM Monal facilities aball be developed on do fdlo
East 30 f of West 200 feet of North 10530 feet Eau 112 of the Nrzthwest 114 of
Narthwes 114of Southeast 114, Las Streets Sacticii 23 54-50,Dade Cwaty,Florida.
Folio NcL 4)00.0790
hCow
East 50 feet of West 130 feet of North 103.30 feet of Fast 112 of Northwest 114 of
NM*wes 114 of Southeast. 114 Less Street, Sectia{o 23 Florida.
Folio No.09-4023-000-0720. E 54-40, ��County,
Patcal 3
East 50 F vt of West 100 feet of North 103.50 feet East 1/2 of Nast tweet 1/4,of
N 114, of Southeast 114,Sect;aa25-34"0, Dade County, Florida.
Folio NcL 094025-000•x900.
West 50 fect of North 10350 feet of Fast 1/2, of 14mhwmt 1/4 of Southeast 114,
Section 2 -34-40,Dada County,Florida.
Folio No 09.4023.0700
i
I
I
OVri\1J
I. PARKING LOT;
U. EDUCATION AND SENIOR CM-!!ENS FACILrMLS
i
I
I. Parkia,g I at
A per of shall be developed in accordance t Qty of South Miami Building
and Con; ctloas Regulatiats. Canamuction of' tneats consisting of asphalt
pa's iigbtin&and fencing.
The lot shall be developed on tho foll dosenffiad propmty;
Lots 66 67,in Block 11,FRANKLIN SUBDIN ISION, as rcoordad in
Hat Book S, at o 20, Dade County, Florida.
Folio No. ZS-010-0660
11-
Lot 69, in Mock I I and 730 feet Allay, W t cad Adjacent Closed
PCC R-92- 515, FRANKLIN SUBDIVISIbN,as re cmded in Flat Book 5,at Page 20,
Dodo jNom. ty, Florida.
Folio -010-0670
1-01
Lot 6% 12 and 7.50 feet Alley,Lying East anent Qos,sd
Per R-92 1315,FRANKLIN SUBbIVISI N, as tiecaa�ded in Plat Book 5, at Page 20,
Dada C
Folio No. ty 023-010-06W; - 6051 S.W.64th Stt et
IL Educatim al aad Senior Ckken Fadlities
The Edu anal Facility will be and expansion of tisr, cbild care arvices that arc
presently mWerad at 6075 S.W. 64th Street,an Af ar-Sdhoci TutorLd Program a Youth
Altemad a Program for at-risk students who have 3een suspended f*om local schools
but woulc irks to continue their academic studies a i well as receive,counseling.
Tbo anal Facility will consist of(3) ci that will acci modste(75)
ebUdmn. In wch claawo=dmm will be a C Tcact oe aad at Assistaat Teacher.
Thu Pm ems that we wM be co with tbs will be utilizing he fa it
wit be a ead Start ftoamm and a Pro-k Progrnni with Dade Couny Public Scboois.
I
l
c
bs
0
j
Sl
TJ
- -4 U 70. 60' s o 0
U 3S 6'cp
tA
c .. R
LA
/ a
� 0
All /LA
0
C / •
r f r
0
8
o / �• 0 �. s
Z W a. v
D �1�s•4• �.,o� zs tee"
N n
N
0
o • ti i
r m
� c n
W. ,� ' AVE -
CA z
SUMMARY MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
Planning Board
Tuesday, August 11, 1998
City Commission Chambers
7:30 P.M.
I. Call to order and the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag
A. Mr. Pages, Chairperson, called the meeting to order.
II. Roll Call
A. Board members present constituting a quorum
1. Mr. Pages; Mr. Huggins; Ms. Chimelis; Mr. Wiscombe; Mr. Lefley
B. Board members absent
1. Mr. Morton; Mr. Basu
C. City staff present
1. Greg Oravec (Acting Director, Planning & Zoning)
III. Public Hearings
A. ITEM: PB-98-016
Applicant: Mayor& City Commission
Request: AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO AN AMENDMENT OF SECTION 20-3.3
(D) OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE IN ORDER TO PERMIT THE
"FRATERNAL ORGANIZATION OR PRIVATE CLUB"USE AS A SPECIAL USE IN
THE "PI" PUBLIC/INSTITUTIONAL ZONING DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY: PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND,
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
1. Mr. Huggins read the request into the record.
PB Min 08-11-98 1
item on a citywide basis. with respect to any business or any catering service and not just with
respect to the Elks Club.
e. Ms. McCann stated that she is "vehemently opposed" to allowing a business in PI zoning
districts, and she questioned the City Manager's ability to revoke an approval.
f. Ms. McCann closed by adding that because an organization wishes to have a business within
the PI zoning district, such a desire is insufficient justification to permit it.
g. Prior to closing the public hearing, Mr. Pages explained that allowing the Elks Club to proceed
was done in order to "flush out" broader issues relating to catering services associated with
fraternal organizations.
16. Public hearing was closed.
17. The Board continued with review of the application.
a. In response Ms. Chimelis's inquiry regarding if the level of food service would be sufficient
for someone without having to cater offsite or to outside interests, Mr. Walker replied that
catering services are probably economically necessary for the individual performing cooking
services at the Elks Club.
b. Mr. Wiscombe explained that he is attempting to examine the item in regard to its impact on
PI zoning districts citywide, as citizens are concerned as to the negative effects on surrounding
residential areas.
c. In regard to discussion on the proposed catering use, staff explained that the important
question is whether or not such a use would be appropriate as an ancillary use in PI zoning
districts.
d. The Board and staff discussed how the Planning Board should proceed with the item, and staff
noted that the City Commission is looking for input from both the public and the Board.
18. Motion: Mr. Lefley moved to disapprove the application, as presented. Ms. Chimelis
seconded the motion.
19. Vote: Approved: 5 Opposed: 0
C. ITEM: PB-98-018
Applicant: Mayor and City Commission
Request: AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH
MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO AN AMENDMENT OF SECTION 20-9 OF THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE TO INCLUDE THOSE PARCELS LEGALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN
WITHIN THE COMMUNITY SERVICE OVERLAY DISTRICT. PROVIDING FOR
PB Min 08-11-98 6
SEVERABILITY: PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT;AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
Location: East 50 feet of West 200 feet of North 105.50 feet of East '/2 of Northwest '/4 of
Southeast '/4 Less Streets, Section 25-54-40, Miami-Dade County, Florida; and,
East 50 feet of West 150 feet of North 105.50 feet of East %2 of Northwest '/<of
Southeast '/4 Less Streets, Section 25-54-40, Miami-Dade County, Florida; and,
East 50 feet of West 100 feet of North 105.50 feet of East %2 of Northwest '/4 of
Southeast '/4 Less Streets, Section 25-54-40, Miami-Dade County, Florida; and,
West 50 feet of North 105.50 feet of East %2 of Northwest '/4 of Southeast '/4 Less
Streets, Section 25-54-40, Miami-Dade County, Florida.
1. Mr. Wiscombe read the request into the record.
2. Staff presented the item to the Board, reviewing a City's Manager's report, dated June 9, 1998,
and noting background information on the City's establishment of the Community Service
Overlay District in 1997.
3. Public hearing was opened.
a. Mr. David Tucker, Sr., of 6556 SW 78 Terrace, signed in and spoke before the Board. Mr.
Tucker began by explaining that questions had been raised as to actual ownership of the
properties involved and that concerns had been expressed as to the amount of paving taking
place.
b. Staff explained that this ordinance, unlike the others considered earlier, does apply to a
particular area.
c. Staff further explained that the City had addressed questions in regard to ownership, as the
deed states "Destiny Human Services Corporation" and not Mount Nebo Missionary Baptist
Church, and that the concerns involving the amount of paving will be addressed later in the
process. including ERPB review.
d. Staff noted that the property had been acquired by a corporation, specifically "Destiny Human
Services Corporation", which is associated with Mount Nebo Missionary Baptist Church, as
Miami-Dade County did not wish to deed property to a religious affiliation.
e. Mr. James Bowman, of 6250 SW 60 Avenue, signed in to speak before the Board. Mr.
Bowman opened by explaining that. from the information presented thus far, he was opposed to
the application.
f. Mr. Bowman suggested that. before the City moves forward with the application, clarification
of issues may be necessary, such as in regard to plans for future facilities.
PB Min 08-11-98
7
O
SUMMARY MINUTES
Regular Meeting
Planning Board
City Commission Chambers
Tuesday, October 13, 1998, 7:30 p.m.
I. Call to order and the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America
A. Mr. Pages, Chairperson, called the meeting to order at 7:36 p.m.
II. Roll Call
A. Members present constituting a quorum
1. Mr. Pages, Mr. Lefley, Mr. Basu, Mr. Morton, Mr. Huggins, Ms. Chimelis
B. Member absent
1. Mr. Wiscombe
C. City staff present
1. Charles Scurr(City Manager); Gregory Oravec (Acting Director. Planning & Zoning); Fernando
Rodriguez, (Director, Public Works); Ron Stroyne (Parking Director)
III. Public Hearings
A. ITEM: PB-98-018
Applicant: Mayor and City Commission
Request: AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,
FLORIDA, RELATING TO AN AMENDMENT OF SECTION 20-9 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT
CODE TO INCLUDE THOSE PARCELS LEGALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN WITHIN THE
COMMUNITY SERVICE OVERLAY DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;PROVIDING
FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT;AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Location: East 50 feet of West 200 feet of North 105.50 feet of East '/z of Northwest 1/4 of
Southeast '/4 Less Streets, Section 25-54-40, Miami-Dade County, Florida; and, East 50
feet of West 150 feet of North 105.50 feet of East % of Northwest '/4 of Southeast '/a
Less Streets, Section 25-54-40, Miami-Dade County, Florida: and, East 50 feet of West
100 feet of North 105.50 feet of East '/z of Northwest '/4 of Southeast '/a Less Streets,
Section 25-54-40, Miami-Dade County, Florida; and, West 50 feet of North 105.50 feet
of East '/z of Northwest '/4 of Southeast '/4 Less Streets, Section 25-54-40, Miami-Dade
County, Florida.
PB Min 10-13-98 1
1. Mr. Morton read the request into the record.
2. Staff presented the item to the Board, relating background information on the establishment of the
Community Service Overlay District in 1997.
3. Staff continued by noting background information relative to tonight's request, including Pastor
Emanuel Whipple's letter submitted on April 13, 1998, and Planning Board's deferral of the item on
August 11, 1998.
4. Staff explained Planning Board's deferral, including the Board's desire to review the actual proposal
for property purchased by Mount Nebo Missionary Baptist Church in February 1998.
5. Staff further explained that additional information on the proposal had been submitted for the
Planning Board's review, including a letter of intent and a site plan.
6. Staff asked that the Board, in reviewing this information. seriously consider two major points
involved, as outlined on page 2 of an inter-office memorandum entitled Community Service Overlay
District and dated October 12, 1998.
7. The public meeting continued.
a. Mr. Lefley inquired as to page 2 of the subject memorandum, specifically item(2), asking if several
of the listed uses were "essentially commercial."
b. Staff acknowledged that some of the listed uses were commercial and reiterated that that was an
important point to consider during review of the request.
c. Staff elaborated that the Community Service Overlav District had been established for existing
properties, including currently existing churches; now, property currently zoned RS-4 is being
considered for incorporation into the District.
d. Mr. Lefley asked if"opening up" for commercial uses was involved and staff responded that, while
they are more "intensive," such uses would have to be associated with the not-for-profit.
e. Mr. Lefley inquired as to the transfer of County property that had occurred and staff replied that the
County could not complete the transfer to Mount Nebo Church directly, but with the not-for-profit
associated with the Church.
f. Mr. Scurr noted that churches have established private, non-profit corporate "arms" to provide such
things as day care centers.
g. Mr. Lefley inquired to whether a wholly-owned church corporation operating a funeral home is
competition with the private sector.
PB Min 10-13-98 2
h. Mr. Scurr replied that, while mention of a funeral home use had not been made thus far, special use
provisions would provide a safeguard and that, in regard to the application at hand, a precedent may be
set with a day care use.
i. Mr. Lefley continued by asking that, if social services or traditional services run by churches and
church-affiliated groups are at the heart of the matter, why is the ordinance so "broad"to include
several other uses.
j. Staff related that past efforts on the part of the City relating to this matter resulted in a what may be
called"community services", including funeral homes, being provided by community providers, such
as churches.
k. In regard to the map, Exhibit B. figure 20-9.1, staff clarified that the darkened parcels on those in the
District, with the arrow indicating the properties included in the request.
1. Mr. Pages asked staff to indicate the approval process involved for properties in the District.
m. Staff stated that permitted use by right includes church, temple, or synagogue; community
residential home having six residents or less; day care center having seven or more children; single-
family dwelling; and park or playground, public or private.
n. Staff stated that special use approval includes ACLF; community residential home having seven
residents or more; counseling services; funeral home; school, elementary or secondary; and school,
vocational or special programs.
o. Mr. Morton asked if it would be possible for the Board recommending deletion some of the included
uses, such as funeral home, and staff responded that such a recommendation can be forwarded to both
the City Commission and staff via memorandum, following which staff can proceed with preparing the
updated ordinance.
p. Mr. Scurr inquired as to whether or not any churches in the neighborhood have funeral home
services, and Pastor Whipple replied that there are none in the City of South Miami.
8. Public hearing was opened.
a. Pastor Whipple, Sr. Pastor of the Mount Nebo Missionary Baptist Church, explained the proposal,
noting that the intention is to open a pre-K school and a tutorial school for the community.
b. Mr. David Tucker. Sr., of 6556 SW 78 Terrace, related his opinions regarding the request, including
that bettering the educational process is a"great undertaking" and that offering tutorial support is an
important service for the community.
PB Min 10-13-98 3
c. Mr. Tucker continued by opining that the request, overall, represents a"community concern", which
will eventually benefit the community's future, and he asked that the Planning Board carefully
consider the details of the request in order to help make that happen.
9. Public hearing was closed.
10. The public meeting continued.
a. Mr. Basu inquired as to the placement of a modular trailer, and staff clarified that the structure would
be a prefabricated unit, to be attached to a slab.
b. Staff noted that, while the City's code does not prohibit such a unit, it would be reviewed by the
ERPB for its aesthetic "compatibility" with the neighborhood.
c. In response to Mr. Basu's questions concerning the unit, a second representative, Mr. Santiago
Cuello, spoke before the Board.
d. Mr. Basu noted that the structure must meet the South Florida Building Code(SFBC) and asked as
to how the structure would be constructed.
e. Mr. Cuello began by explaining that the structure is constructed according to the Florida Building
Code and would therefore meet the SFBC and is approved by the State of Florida, Department of
Community Affairs (DCA).
f. Mr. Basu inquired as to whether the structure had been approved by Dade County, and Mr. Cuello
replied that the County is to accept structures approved by DCA.
g. Mr. Basu asked how high the floor would be and Mr. Cuello stated that it would be raised
approximately 28"to 34", with 34 inches being the maximum.
h. Mr. Cuello continued by stating that a concrete footing and a reinforced concrete slab would be
used.
i. Mr. Basu attempted to clarify by summarizing that foundation walls "coming up" 30 inches, with a
slab at grade, would be used.
j. Mr. Cuello replied that the slab comes prefabricated, with footings placed at different locations and
with anchors "all the way around."
k. Discussion on the unit continued, and Mr. Basu inquired as to the materials to be used.
1. Mr. Cuello responded that plywood, gypsum board, fiber cement, and a rubber roof would be
included.
PB Min 10-13-98 4
m. Mr. Basu inquired as to how the site plan relates with the church property, and staff replied that the
church property is located across the street.
n. In regard to parking, staff confirmed that more parking is being provided than what the City code
requires.
o. Mr. Basu inquired as to City code provisions applicable to the prefabricated structure, and staff
confirmed that there are no such code provisions that address the prefabricated structure.
p. Staff noted that ERPB would review the structure for its architectural merit and compatibility with
the surrounding neighborhood.
q. In regard to approvals of the structure, Mr. Basu noted that while DCA may have approved the
structure, Dade County must approve it as well.
r. Staff replied that in consultation with the City's Building Director, who would review the structure
for compliance with the SFBC and with the City's code, Ms. Sonia Lama had explained that there are
no grounds for disapproval of the structure.
11. The public meeting continued.
a. Mr. Morton inquired as to the 15-foot alley shown on the sketch, and staff responded that the
incorrect site plan was included in the Board's informational packet and that the correct one was being
presented to the Board directly.
b. Mr. Morton asked again in regard to an alley, and staff responded that the other plan shows no alley.
c. Ms. Chimelis inquired as to whether the corporation that had been established meets the legal
standard, and staff replied affirmatively.
d. Ms. Chimelis spoke in regard to the Board's meeting held on August 11, 1998, particularly public
comments relating to agenda item PB-98-018, and staff responded that such commentary largely
involved another church project, namely the rehabilitation of an apartment building.
e. Ms. Chimelis explained that she was concerned with the intended hours, such as 7:30 a.m. through
9:00 p.m., and she opined that the neighborhood will be impacted earlier than 7:30 a.m. and later than
9:00 P.M.
f. Ms. Chimelis stated that she would like to know if the applicant has addressed impact upon the
neighborhood, including activity and traffic concerns, and has polled the neighborhood at-large to
ascertain the degree of support for the item.
g. Staff responded that these concerns, such as involving how a particular land use will affect
surrounding land uses, would be addressed later under the special use application.
PB Min 10-13-98
5
h. Ms. Chimelis replied that, while these concerns may very well be addressed during the special use
process, she would like the applicant to respond to these concerns at this meeting as well.
i. Pastor Whipple stated that he had received no negative comments pertaining to such concerns, and he
noted that a Ms. Jean Butler, a member of the community, was present who could also respond.
j. Ms. Butler explained that she lives in the community and knows the area well, and she noted that the
hours of operation would not"directly or indirectly affect the neighborhood,"as it is currently a busy
area.
k. Ms. Butler continued by explaining that the item will lead to improvement in the neighborhood,
particularly for children as day care and tutorial services would eventually be offered in the
community.
1. Ms. Chimelis stated that she was desirous of learning what is intended for property located west of
Mount Nebo Church.
m. As discussion continued and for purposes of clarification, staff explained that the Board is currently
reviewing four properties located south of the Church.
n. Mr. Pages attempted to summarized how best for the Board to proceed by stating that two issues are
involved, the request in particular and the precedent such a request will create for the future.
o. In regard to further concern about how members of the community view the request and how they
feel about future plans stemming from the request. Ms. Chimelis and Mr. Pages stated that, for the
record, these concerns are being addressed to the applicant.
i
p. Pastor Whipple responded that they have attempted to address these concerns and that they feel
everything drafted thus far will have a positive impact upon the community.
q. Pastor Whipple explained that, in regard to SW 64 Street. "a lot needs to be done',particularly for
the immediate area.
r. Mr. Pages asked Pastor Whipple if, to his knowledge, there is "real opposition" in the community,
and Pastor Whipple replied that there is none.
s. Mr. Basu returned to intentions for property located west of Mount Nebo Church, inquiring as to
possible expansion of day care facilities, staff responded the applicant may be able to address this
concern.
t. Mr. Scurr asked the Board for clarification as to what exactly it was
a pp rovin g, be it zoning, type of
structure, etc.
PB Min 10-13-98
6
s
u. Mr. Basu responded that-the Board is approving the ordinance with respect to the subject properties.
v. Mr. Pages summarized that the Board is only looking at this specific property, in this specific
location, for this specific use.
w. In response to Mr. Pages' inquiry, staff explained that if the property is sold to a private individual
or private entity, "a non-church located in the neighborhood," it reverts back to single-family
residential.
12. The public meeting continued.
a. Mr. Pages related his opinion involving use by right with respect to church,temple, or synagogue,
and he commented that a memorandum recommending changes to the ordinance for certain uses can be
drafted.
b. Mr. Pages continued by noting that he believed such a memorandum would be unnecessary,
particularly as the special use process is in place as a safeguard.
c. Mr. Lefley questioned if the establishment of the overlay district had come before the Planning
Board for its consideration, and he stated that the Board should be aware of the "parameters" involving
several of the uses, including ACLFs and funeral homes.
d. Mr. Pages reiterated that uses of this nature are contingent upon another approval process,namely
the special use process.
e. Staff added that, in addition to the special use approval, City zoning restrictions exist that would
provide a measure of protection when certain uses are involved.
13. Motion: Mr. Lefley moved approval that the properties as noted by the legal description are to be
added to the existing community overlay district. Mr. Morton seconded the motion.
14. Vote: Approved 6 Opposed 0
IV. Public Workshops
A. Proposed Valet Parking Ordinance
The Workshop will allow the Planning Board, City staff,valet industry representatives,and
members of the public the opportunity to discuss a proposed ordinance to regulate valet services
in the City of South Miami.
1. The Board proceeded with the public workshop portion on valet parking.
2. All interested parties held discussion and debate on valet parking in South Miami
PB Min 10-13-98
7
g. Ms. Cathy McCann. of 5820 SW 87 Street. spoke before the Board. Ms. McCann related that
the issues involving the application are rather "unclear' at this time.
4. Public hearing was closed.
5. The Board continued with review of the application.
a. Mr. Lefley explained that Miami-Dade County would be hesitant to deed property to groups
with religious affiliations, and he suggested that there may be a legal conflict of interest
involved.
b. Mr. Lefley further suggested that the matter be deferred, in order to permit further review by
the City Attorney.
c. Ms. Chimelis noted that the application may be incomplete, including lack of a site plan.
d. Mr. Wiscombe offered that the application lacks "vision".
e. Mr. Huggins suggested that a sketch or outline be drafted and included in order to show what
is planned for the property.
f. Mr. Pages concurred that the application may need to be deferred, in order for the Board to
receive additional details concurrently, including changes in the ordinance and plans for the
property.
6. Motion: Mr. Wiscombe moved to defer the item. Mr. Huggins seconded the motion.
7. Vote: Approved: 5 Opposed: 0
D. ITEM: PB-98-019
Applicant: South Miami/Coral Gable Elks Lodge #1676
Request: A Special Use Permit for a"Fraternal Organization or Private Club," including
catering services as an ancillary use, as specified in §20-3.4(13)(2)of the Land
Development Code.
Location: 6304 SW 781h Street
1. Mr. Lefley read the request into the record.
2. Staff presented the item to the Board, noting that changes are in order for the request,
including a special use for a fraternal organization, deleting private club, and removing catering
services as an ancillary use.
3. Staff requested that the application be deferred to the Board's next regularly scheduled
meeting, in order to evaluate and incorporate the changes that had been voted on at this evening's
PB Min 08-11-98 8
m. Mr. Basu inquired as to how the site plan relates with the church property, and staff replied that the
church property is located across the street.
n. In regard to parking, staff confirmed that more parking is being provided than what the City code
requires.
o. Mr. Basu inquired as to City code provisions applicable to the prefabricated structure, and staff
confirmed that there are no such code provisions that address the prefabricated structure.
p. Staff noted that ERPB would review the structure for its architectural merit and compatibility with
the surrounding neighborhood.
q. In regard to approvals of the structure, Mr. Basu noted that while DCA may have approved the
structure, Dade County must approve it as well.
r. Staff replied that in consultation with the City's Building Director, who would review the structure
for compliance with the SFBC and with the City's code, Ms. Sonia Lama had explained that there are
no grounds for disapproval of the structure.
11. The public meeting continued.
a. Mr. Morton inquired as to the 15-foot alley shown on the sketch, and staff responded that the
incorrect site plan was included in the Board's informational packet and that the correct one was being
presented to the Board directly.
b. Mr. Morton asked again in regard to an alley, and staff responded that the other plan shows no alley.
c. Ms. Chimelis inquired as to whether the corporation that had been established meets the legal
standard, and staff replied affirmatively.
d. Ms. Chimelis spoke in regard to the Board's meeting held on August 11, 1998, particularly public
comments relating to agenda item PB-98-018, and staff responded that such commentary largely
involved another church project, namely the rehabilitation of an apartment building.
e. Ms. Chimelis explained that she was concerned with the intended hours, such as 7:30 a.m. through
9:00 p.m., and she opined that the neighborhood will be impacted earlier than 7:30 a.m. and later than
9:00 P.M.
f. Ms. Chimelis stated that she would like to know if the applicant has addressed impact upon the
neighborhood, including activity and traffic concerns, and has polled the neighborhood at-large to
ascertain the degree of support for the item.
g. Staff responded that these concerns, such as involving how a particular land use will affect
surrounding land uses, would be addressed later under the special use application.
PB Min 10-13-98 5
h. Ms. Chimelis replied that, while these concerns may very well be addressed during the special use
process, she would like the applicant to respond to these concerns at this meeting as well.
i. Pastor Whipple stated that he had received no negative comments pertaining to such concerns, and he
noted that a Ms. Jean Butler, a member of the community, was present who could also respond.
j. Ms. Butler explained that she lives in the community and knows the area well, and she noted that the
hours of operation would not "directly or indirectly affect the neighborhood," as it is currently a busy
area.
k. Ms. Butler continued by explaining that the item will lead to improvement in the neighborhood,
particularly for children as day care and tutorial services would eventually be offered in the
community.
1. Ms. Chimelis stated that she was desirous of learning what is intended for property located west of
Mount Nebo Church.
m. As discussion continued and for purposes of clarification, staff explained that the Board is currently
reviewing four properties located south of the Church.
n. Mr. Pages attempted to summarized how best for the Board to proceed by stating that two issues are
involved, the request in particular and the precedent such a request will create for the future.
o. In regard to further concern about how members of the community view the request and how they
feel about future plans stemming from the request, Ms. Chimelis and Mr. Pages stated that, for the
record, these concerns are being addressed to the applicant.
p. Pastor Whipple responded that they have attempted to address these concerns and that they feel
everything drafted thus far will have a positive impact upon the community.
q. Pastor Whipple explained that, in regard to SW 64 Street, "a lot needs to be done",particularly for
the immediate area.
r. Mr. Pages asked Pastor Whipple if to his knowledge, there is "real opposition" in the community,
and Pastor Whipple replied that there is none.
s. Mr. Basu returned to intentions for property located west of Mount Nebo Church, inquiring as to
possible expansion of day care facilities, staff responded the applicant may be able to address this
concern.
t. Mr. Scurr asked the Board for clarification as to what exactly it was approving, be it zoning, type of
structure. etc.
PB Min 10-13-98 6
1
u. Mr. Basu responded that the Board is approving the ordinance with respect to the subject properties.
v. Mr. Pages summarized that the Board is only looking at this specific property, in this specific
location, for this specific use.
w. In response to Mr. Pages' inquiry, staff explained that if the property is sold to a private individual
or private entity, "a non-church located in the neighborhood," it reverts back to single-family
residential.
12. The public meeting continued.
a. Mr. Pages related his opinion involving use by right with respect to church, temple, or synagogue,
and he commented that a memorandum recommending changes to the ordinance for certain uses can be
drafted.
b. Mr. Pages continued by noting that he believed such a memorandum would be unnecessary,
particularly as the special use process is in place as a safeguard.
c. Mr. Lefley questioned if the establishment of the overlay district had come before the Planning
Board for its consideration, and he stated that the Board should be aware of the "parameters" involving
several of the uses, including ACLFs and funeral homes.
d. Mr. Pages reiterated that uses of this nature are contingent upon another approval process,namely
the special use process.
e. Staff added that, in addition to the special use approval, City zoning restrictions exist that would
provide a measure of protection when certain uses are involved.
13. Motion: Mr. Lefley moved approval that the properties as noted by the legal description are to be
added to the existing community overlay district. Mr. Morton seconded the motion.
14. Vote: Approved 6 Opposed 0
IV. Public Workshops
A. Proposed Valet Parking Ordinance
The Workshop will allow the Planning Board, City staff, valet industry representatives,and
members of the public the opportunity to discuss a proposed ordinance to regulate valet services
in the City of South Miami.
1. The Board proceeded with the public workshop portion on valet parking.
2. All interested parties held discussion and debate on valet parking in South Miami
PB Min 10-13-98
7
i
I
July 1, 1998
Pastor Emanuel Whipple
Mt.Nebo Missionary Baptist Church
6075 SW 64th Street
South Miami, Florida 33143
Re: Timetable for approval of South Miami Youth Academy
Dear Pastor Whipple:
At the request of the City Manager, I am providing you with a potential timetable for approval of
the South Miami Youth Academy. There are three separate processes that must be completed
and approved before you can begin construction: (1) an amendment to the Community Service
Overlay District to include the new church property, (2) a special use hearing to approve the
alternative school, and (3) building permit application review, which includes review by the
Environmental Review & Preservation Board. All of these Boards, processes, and meetings can
become very confusing. Therefore,please find the following graphical breakdown.
Amendment to the Community Special Use Approval of an Building Permit
Service Overlay District alternative school Application Process
1St Hearing by City Commission Before Planning Board on If the amendment to the
was,completed on June 161h August 11th Community Service Overlay
District and the Special Use
Request are approved, your
The Planning Board will hear Before City Commissi contractor may submit
on on building permit a lications
the application on August 11 th August 18th on August 1 9th pp
2"d Hearing before the City To receive zoning approval of the building permit applications, ERPB
Commission is scheduled for approval of the proposal is required. The ERPB can hear your
August 18th application on September 0, if all required materials have been
submitted. Between August 19th and September 1St, the Building
Department will be able to review the construction plans and approve
them or inform you of deficiencies, as appropriate.
The flow chart demonstrates that if all required approvals are given, you may receive permission
to begin construction as early as September 2, 1998. Please be aware, however, that the time
frame surrounding building permit approval is largely controlled by the quality of plans
submitted and may vary.
If you have any questions,please call me at(305) 663-6327.
Very truly yours,
Gregory J. Oravec
Acting Director of Planning& Zoning
c: Charles D. Scurr
City Manager
Sonia Lama
Building Director Pastor Whipple time frame
i
City of South Miami
6130 Sunset Drive,South Miami,Florida 33143
February 6, 1996
Emanuel Whipple
6075 SW 64 Street
Miami, Florida 33143
Dear Applicant:
This letter is to inform you that your request for the approval of-
SECURITY BARS [EB-96-008]
6075 SW 64 STREET
SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 33143
was presented to the Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB) at their
meeting on Tuesday, February 6, 1996, and was
APPROVED: 3 - 1
All decisions and recommendations of the Environmental Review&Preservation Board[ERPB]shall be posted on the
City Hall bulletin board immediately following the ERPB meeting. An applicant may obtain a building permit after
noon of the day after the ERPB meeting,at which the application was approved,if all other requirements for the permit
have been met. An appeal of an ERPB decision or recommendation may be filed at any time before a building permit
is issued by filing same with the city clerk upon a form prescribed therefore. Appeals may be taken by the applicant,
interested citizens,or the city administration [per Section 20-6.2(A)of City's Land Development Code].
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please, contact Brian Soltz at the Building, Zoning & Community
Development Department between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM,Monday through Friday,at(305)663-6325.
"City of Pleasant Living"
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
BUILDING AND ZONING
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND PRESERVATION BOARD APPLICATION
STREET ADDRESS OF JOB: 6075 S_W_ 64 Street SOUTH MIAMI.FL
PROPERTY OWNER: Mt- Nebo Missionary Baptist Church TEL.NO. ( 305) 667-3696
ADDRESS: 6075 S.W. 64 Street South Miami FL 33143
STREET CITY STATE ZIP
WHAT IS THE PRESENT USE OF THE PROPERTY?
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE BUSINESS OFFICE RETAIL STORE OTHER:
APARTMENT OR TOWNHOUSE MEDICAL OFFICE AUTO REPAIR Church
PLEASE,BRIEFLY SUMMARIZE THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED:
Reauestina that the E.R.P.B. Board will resend a motion in regard
of security bars being installed with a complete arch opening
Note: explaination given by Pastor Whipple
WHAT WILL THE TOTAL COST BE TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT? $ 1 , 400.00
APPLICANT'S NAME: Mt. Nebo Missionary Baptist Church TELNO. ( 305) 667-3696
ADDRESS: _6075 S.W. 64 Street South Miami PL 33143
STREET CITY STATE ZIP
AS THE APPLICANT,PLEASE.INDICATE YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO THIS PROJECT
X OWNER OF THE PROPERTY TENANT/LESSEE CONTRACTOR OTHER:
OWNER OF THE BUSINESS ARCHITECT ENGINEER
PLEASE. INDICATE CONTACT PERSON(ERPB's decision will be mailed to the contact person indicated below):
PROPERTY OWNER Natalie D. Jackson
6075 S.W. 64 Street
APPLICANT Miami, FL 33143
OTHER(provide name and address) 4
zw -�./-.1 d'
LEASE SIGN tOUR NAMt NAM ON THE LINE ABOVE DATE
_' >> >i »
c
City of South Miami
6130 Sunset Drive,South Miami,Florida 33143
January 26, 1996
Emanuel Whipple
6075 SW 64 Street
Miami, Florida 33143
Dear Applicant:
This letter is to inform you that your request for the approval of-
SECURITY BARS [EB-96-008]
6075 SW 64 STREET
SOUTH MIAMI,FLORIDA 33143
was presented to the Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB) at their
meeting on Tuesday, January 26, 1996, and was
APPROVED: 2 - 1
with the following condition(s):
That the security bars on the front doors have arched tops.
All decisions and recommendations of the Environmental Review&Preservation Board[ERPB]shall be posted on the
City Hall bulletin board immediately following the ERPB meeting. An applicant may obtain a building permit after
noon of the day after the ERPB meeting,at which the application was approved,if all other requirements for the permit
have been met. An appeal of an ERPB decision or recommendation may be filed at any time before a building permit
is issued by filing same with the city clerk upon a form prescribed therefore. Appeals may be taken by the applicant,
interested citizens,or the city administration [per Section 20-6.2(A)of City's Land Development Code].
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please, contact Brian Soltz at the Building, Zoning& Community
Development Department between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM,Monday through Friday,at(305)663-6325.
"City of Pleasant Living"
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
BUILDING AND ZONING
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND PRESERVATION BOARD APPLICATION,
STREET ADDRESS OF JOB: 6075 SW 64 S rppt SOUTH MIAMI,FL
PROPERTY OWNER: Mt. Nebo Baptist C'h u r h TEL.NO. 6 A 7_I h A A
ADDRESS: 6075 SW 64 Street South Miami F1 33143
STREET CITY STATE ZIP
WHAT IS THE PRESENT USE OF THE PROPERTY?
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE BUSINESS OFFICE RETAIL STORE OTHER:
church
APARTMENT OR TOWNHOUSE MEDICAL OFFICE AUTO REPAIR
PLEASE,BRIEFLY SUMMARIZE THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED:
La Famosa Iron Works is going to , install security bars
on the east and west sides of the church, along
with both front doors up and downstairs and east upstairs door_
WHAT WILL THE TOTAL COST BE TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT? $ 1400.00
APPLICANT'S NAME: Mt_ Nphn Ra=ti Gt- Church TEL NO. 667-3696
ADDRESS: 6075 SW 64 Street South Miami F1 33143
STREET CITY STATE ZIP
AS THE APPLICANT,PLEASE,INDICATE YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO THIS PROJECT
X OWNER OF THE PROPERTY TENANT/LESSEE CONTRACTOR OTHER:
OWNER OF THE BUSINESS ARCHITECT ENGINEER
PLEASE,INDICATE CONTACT PERSON(ERPB's decision will be mailed to the contact person indicated below):
PROPERTY OWNER
Emanuel Whipple
APPLICANT 6075 SW 64 Street
Miami, F1 33143
OTHER(provide name and address) 4
PL ASE SI N-f6UR NAME ON THE LINE ABOVE DATE
I �
":IL
i
r`rc:n-L nurch, tracing South East Side of Church
Fast Side Lot of Church West Side Lot, Adjacent to
Church
west side Lot of Church? and West side of Church
Neighboring House