Loading...
6041 SW 63 ST_PB-YEAR 1957 0 II x 04.00 6 X20 ' 5100 6040 6020 6000 °+ - 29 = 30 ° 31 5978 ~ 5966 595 '— 6' UT1L £ASM — _//_ 100 104:15 J 52 25 // // // 34 64.12 84.28 27 28 30 31 32 99 0 100# 1(9 102 103 15 7 50 5 15 86, 96 301 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 a O1 pg N Q 99 W 100 124 6209 208-_10 6 61 3 61 3 6117 6 09 6 9771 �98 r, 3.75 6083 6067 6051 60310 2 07.1 11 017 � � > 62 TERR . S.W. TER 10 u 96 611 // 33.70 97 , 6 2 23 96 95 s0 5 5091 •90 50 02 3 10 6170 8 8 O 89 $$ 6239-41 6238- 00 O 6 2 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13� ° S5 94 93 °92 0 91� 90 ^ 03 4 9 6082 6066 6050 `D ° 6250 253-55 ' Lj 04 5 07 8 93 94 94. 85 87 > • 4 O 6273 O 6272 J 5 6 65 8 9 25 11 12° 84 85 86 _0 60841 S .88 89 P CL Q 86 " 05 6 06 7 " " /' rr // /r /r 25 33.3o 6083 6061 6051 ��� 6289 6288 so 75 6017 6290 0 % 96 63 ST. M 50 50 c� 07 P W?e5 25 50 33.22 -7 78 75 76 4 84 50 f 2s 50 � 18 16 15 ' 83 82 • ° 09 1 25 FrI,17 16 15 14 13° ° 83 a, n82 81 p 79 ° 6301 6 ° cco N o o° m° oNO o X4'0 6040 `O 6 86 0 10 631� � 1 � � bo �ObO 6300 11 26319 24 6316 14.1 1.4.. ...—�. -- _ 81 .. _ 12 6333 12 73- 79 O 4 5 6 7 8 9� 10 11 12� 0 72 73 74 6350 13 3 23 6332. C CD _ 80 76 P 77 2 6335 �63 61 1 61 3 `" `-' ° 605.3- 6017 6332 14 6351 5 251 60 5 ? 60 9 6017 6340 4 22 11 63 TERR. - so 715 5 8 15 O 6350 C3 to 6353- M S.U/ 63 TERR. �� �� rr ., a 4 so so s 50 su 5�-" 1'6 6365 10 4 05 07 08 081 ''09 70 69 68 67 ° 17 6367- 21 6364 °� 1n 4.51 6 7 8 ° 66 o O96 ° ° ,� 10 11 12m a, 71 70 - 68 67� 6.6 0 5985 9 32s 6083 6 7 69 , " 18 6 5981 20 9e 6372 c 07 �C Ln so 0 ,5 6051 6039 6017 600.1 M 7 5991 19 8 H ® R N r/ 50 7.5 50 50 /�.,! � °.�i�-,..m,P',,,,,,,,_ P r1_I_\ /_I�_.. �°_ A/ 5 9b 86 6380 0 38 240 1225 r MH"VNLIN I SUB Dj\yam T.r�:.�n✓_ i'V -� t a A kESOLUT100, ACTING UPON CERTAIN RECOMIEWATIONS " OF TO ADVISORY SING AM PLAMXNG,BOARD$ MAY 29 i` II A. 0.-•.-197... • .. ... _<..«..,, .x '..,.. .. .�'4w , ... r ... _. : t i ...:n ...• ��e•°.6'Tst 4'- R,, C•� �'.i rb�6 CD4 �?f6 ( aVplirratigp- f41r a ' var-lan6i� p& 1t construct a Wilding on Lot 872 Block 15 FRMXLTM S MIMIC, and ...x,. ,.•: . !: . - -WH i*1A4y1g*r"r-on1ng and, PlanaLng 80 rd:. � ' � ��, �': .:: � �° �• appkikat1®n meets the re- quirments of the 'Sluin Clegg � itts e'& Win . :. .' •_•°:�° ,... 5 t .t' the variance be granted providiqz. the set�bac '&ra,-as follows: 2'7 - fte.t-'on S. e •61rd Street 1.0.E f fit ��.i ea x.4i&. ._.y. ind_-.,&ldo this the building be limited t® four *nits instead of six . .. - units g and =. vl&a .,, 1pg,. and, ? xnLng Board has rea vie d-,the nde4 A001, the, Slleac' ttee and the AdvLoory ZonLag.l.and Planfting, bdaxd. NaOe been.met.$ - r,1> � : L• :s OREO.: E L . THE CI �._� nLhg^.D ds::bo%a0_:- hq.samlare. hereby .accepted awd a 1. GRANTED subject to .ay0rdv&l.,_r•gf :applicable ,plan byY, :thp. AaL1 ing Aep- FF t. , -•Conditidndd -h ve th�t:.,;uaele�®a_util ec. by � . u i g a. hard r 0 .., $ be 1d1kg_ r t.' :sg , ire.,sip• n f�' ►, date ..Q f `: a$.s ,�e��ie� ��a9' the permLssion granted' by �thft•Lrtr lati . shall.,.-beck__%IL : d,iyatd. :. ". ., PASSE AND AWFTW thla 4th_.day-.of Janes A. D. 1957. . Presiding 0111C er9 Ity c AST: My Clem n4Mfi . �r"vw«���l Vd xa I-rin L ,I�• fnct . n �.. A y x • is x_ .. �'.:.'�'�. .. .,.. �;,�: _ ,_ .. _ .r.^��►.rR«'[ua+r�If e.9"e�'�.��pe�t' �«�:� �f� 6xk3��' f,3,�e�!n��+j��npart� ��9 ��7•!l"F"`f!T°x, ,ni w,..,.... .t..., st�::ir'�+vRI , . •••rte,..-►,.A..�arr ..�wirs t lR � ' tls it lA4 '�L4F+�g ��., • !q! '�"f�ln .ry q. f I VARIANCE ON LOT SIZE AND SEA`-BACKS Lo L; Richardson - Clarify - Variance Lot 87, Elk 15 FRANKLIN SUED. Zoning • RU 4-8 Requirements Minimum Lot Red;, 80 ft frontage - 8000 sq. ft. Max. -lot coverage 407. - 3200 s ft. Min, size units is. er � Ap �� unit) 500 s ft. q 49t area PDX ;A i ?r . SOv sq. ft. Reg. setbacks: Front A 25 ft. Rear - 25 ft. Side Street a 25 ft. Inside - 15 ft. PROPOSED: Log 50 x 100 5000 sq. ft. Additional street width 17'-® 4 63 St. 60 Ct, Adjusted lot size 331 x 837 - 2739 sqo ft. Bldg. size 2818 19 x 481 - 1344 sq. ft. Bldg. size (4070 lot coverage) average 249 sq. ft. Yard area o approx. 1365 sqo ft. or 341 seq. ft. per :snit I I 50Ur�► i H.GEORGE FINK,A.LA. \ O Chairman �. City 0f SOUth Miami P.O.BOX 867 .00.ggf,ATED 1927 'a ` SOUTH MIAMI 43,FLORIDA Lpgi� Re: Vaaianceof set back requirements for Lot 87, Block 15, FRANKLIN SUBDIVISION, South Miami, Fla. October 3 , 1955 Honorable Mayor and City Council, City of South Miami, Fla. Gentlemen: On July 15, 1955 the City of South Miami Planning Board wrote you stating that "Relative to the request for variance on the above property to permit setback of 19.59' from west line instead of the required 251 , ands setback of 51 on the east line instead of the required 151 , we hereby ask -for additional time to study this prior to submittal of our recommendations for the following reasons: 1. This is a vital "breakdown" of setback requirements and merits careful study. 2. SW 60th Court is only fifteen (15) feet wide at this point and also present a proble, that merits careful study. At that time (July 15, 1955) we requested a continuation of this matter until 11your next regular meeting11. NOVA THEREFORE, since conditions are changing very rapidly in the colored section of our City, and we wish to study the _T_ complete overall conditions prior to submitting a recommendations we hereby request a continuation of this matter for a thirty (30) day period, at which time we will endeavor to present 'z recommendations not only for this particular case but for an overall plan for the future since this area was originally platted with no idea in mond of the future growth of. this area. Respectfully Submitted, : CITY OF. SOUTH 1,11IA14I PLANNING BOARD, HGF/dsf �� ---�� Chairman 9. y1 COPY June 8, 1955 City of South Mini South Miami. Florida Re: Lot 879 Block 158 F'RANKLIR SUBDIVISION,, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 58 page 34, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida Gentlemen: We respectfully request a variance of set-back requirements of 25 feet from the most lino of the Property to 19059 feet, and the setback requirement of 15 feet from the oast line of the property to 5 feeto for that plans and specifications were prepared for a six unit apartment house buildings financing arranged, mortgage placed and contractor retainodg without know- lodge of the recent change of set-back requirements, It was only when plans Were presented for permit that the owner learned of recent changes in set-back require- mentso Very truly yours, (signed) Lowell L, Richardson Lowell L, Richardson 472 Nu 10 street 4 SOUTH 141APTI ADVISOR: ZONING & PLANNING BOA;?D AGENDA as ae cez JUI E 8, 1956 kUt blc- JV9,-- 11TG Re: Shuff e Board Courts in little park at With Miller Drive and 57 St,s legally described RECREATION BOARD as Block 3 CAM- BRIDGE 3..rA.INS RB 20-48 See copy of notice for details REGULAR 1-TEEBTING: to Minutes: Regular meeting., May 25P, 1956, 11. 13 M4S RLFFRRFia BY CTTTY COUNCIL- A. Held over from asst neeti.ngz I* Bonded Collection Agency for TiPm, Spinkss, tentative purchaser, request for variance to perms it erection of.� a proposed building on Lot 37 Blk 6 FRAM Ill S'M. 5/340 (North of 6581. SW 59 Place, NOTE: This was also re- ferred to the Slum Clearance Board,. ) BOARD'S REC0I0fINDAT ION.- That the request as presented be denied,., NOTE: On application of Rs Geo. Fink for Geo. Cravero for rezoning of proposed plat of SBA VIE14 PAMi lst ADD,.,p public hearing (subject to receipt of proper application and fee) has been set for July 200 area of notification to be .set at 600 ft, ' 2,, Rose ��3.uCotey and Rose 11. .Fox,, application for variance to operate infarct nursery at ,5341 SW 67 Ave. (loot 28 GRANDVIEW PARJ� PB 49-82,, zoned. RU�1) BOARD'S ACTION: To table this matter until the next regular meeting for further details, Bo Referred Jtune 5o 1956A 3o Jas L. Parrish.. Sr., request for vari.ance from mini sqo ft. requirements to erect a 1200 sq, ft,. resi.d anc:e on his property at 6801 sw 67 Ave. BOARD'S RECOVO-T3 tDAa10N: That the requested variance to erect a 1.200 square foot house be granted.,, subject t o the removal Of the present residence can the property within 60 days after certificate of occupancy Is issued on the new residences and providing Ord.#349 has been passed and. adopted prior to June 19® 1956. © Harry Seitl.i.n$ application for public hearing for reso ing Lot 514 Blk 9 FRAI±IE IN SURD (east, side of Bid 59 Court. south of SIB 6)4 Sto) to permit a duplex. BOARD®S ACTION: That a public hearing be set for July 6. 1967 and that area of notification be set at 400 ft, 5- Frank Peters,, request for variances to build on 50 ft. toe; (Lot 8,, Blk 9 COCOPL M TER11M.CEs south of 7111 SW 63 Ct BOARD'S iECW-R'ENDA IONo That the request for variance be granted as to lot sizes but subject to regulation setbacks and all other zoning requirements., 6. Re Lo L. Ri.chardsons request to erect 6—unit apto building on Lot 879 Blk 15 FRAITELIN SURD. 5-34, BOARD'S REC01VENDAT101%, That the original request be denied$ but should 14ra Richardson be agreeable to the following conditionssthat variance be granted, the following conditions to bee set back' of 27 ft on SW 63. Stos 10 ft„ on each side,, 10 ft,. from rear,and the building limited to 4 units,. This is in agreement with the Stun Clearance Board's recommendation. June 1 1956, Council action: That this be tabled until such time that L. Le Richardson submits a sketch for approval of the City Counci&s . MIN9TES OF THE MEETING OF THE SLUM CLEARANCE COMMITTEE FIELD ON THURS- DAY-0 JUNE 7v 1956 AT THE CITY HALL a AT 8:00 P.M. Present: Chairman Mayor Tevis Members Councilman Corley Carl Gluck Ream Dukes Advisor H, Geo, Fink, Chairman Planning; Board Mr, Lm Lm Richardson, accompanied by his attorney, Mr, Bo A, Sil- verman,, presented his request to build a 6-unit apartment house on Lot 87, Block 15 FRANKLING S?TBD, PB 5/54, After lengthy discussion and study of the request and its effect on the future development of the area, it was moved by Mr. Gluck, seconded by Mr. Corley, that we make the following; recommendation to the Council, namely; That the request of Mr, L. :Richardson be granted with the following restrictions; 1® SET6BACKS as follows 272 ft. on S14 63 Street 10 ft, on each side 10 ft o setback in rear 2. BUILDING to be limited to 4 instead of 6 units, It was further recommended that these restrictions as to set-backs be considered as minimum for the spe- cific areao MOTION PASSED Unanimously No further business was considered and the meeting; was adjourned at 8:30 P.M. '..May 22, 1956 Mr. ; Benedict A. Silverman, Atty. ,. 228 A Secaaid '.Aveipue `Miami, Florida Re: D,- ' L. Richardson and. Val Sokoloff 'Dot $7, Block 1"5 PRAMIN SUB. .PB -5/54 Dear Mri .Silverman: This As , to acknowledje receipt of your letter of May- 21 with reference' -to 'the above,c aptioned ,matter and 'advise you that it will be presented. to the City Council at its nett regular meeting. . Howe• ever, we wish to ' call your attention to the fact that that meeting will be on ,dune , as the Council meets on the 1st and 3rd'TTue s ays of each month;., We would also like to -call.-your attention to your refer+�nce� to a sidewalk lion i this is for a .street paving and a sidewalk, Very truly yours;. gGM Syins G. Aiartin; City: Clerk BENEDICT A. SILVERMAAN ATTORNEY AT LAW MAY 22 1956 r ! 228 N. E. SECOND AVENIIB MIAMI. FLORIDA pg�� TELEPHONE S2-8445 CITY OF SOUTH May 21, 1956 Zoning and Planning Board. City of South Miami P. 0. Box 867 South Miami, Florida. Re : L. L. Richardson and Val Sokoloff Lot 87, Block 15, FRANIMIH SUB. PB 5f 54 Gentlemen: Please be advised that my client, Mr. L. L. Richardson, the Owner of the above described lot has had a Petition for a Variance pending before the Zoning and Planning Board of the City of South Miami for almost one year. Please be further advised that inspite of repeated phone c- alls and repeated requests, the City of South Miami Zoning and Planning Board has refused to take any action on this matter. My client is willing to agree to the following setbacks if you will o.k, the issuance of the variance;- 25 feet set-back on the south boundary line; 5 foot set-back on the north boundary line; 5 foot set-back on the east boundary line and 17-14 feet set-back on the west boundary line. These set-backs will permit the creation of 50 foot streets through the area and. also allow enough room for the creation of sidewalks. If this plan meets with your approval., will you kindly recommend the passage of the necessary resolution at your next meeting. If this plan does not meet with your approval, will you kindly reject our Petition for Variance so that we may pursue our necessary remedies. Please be further advised that my client is still being t axed for the property and only recently he received a sidewalk lien. assess- ment. However, if the proposed set-back requirements are carried out on this lot, it will completely use up all of the land in the above referred to lot to the extent that my client's lot will actually be non-extistent. Pursuant, thereto, if that is your intention, my client would appreciate your Making a recommendation that the City purchase the Zoning and Planning Board -2- May 21, 1956 lot from hire so that he will no longer be required to pay taxes and sidewalk liens for a lot which would, in that event, be valueless. Please be further advised that my client has a commitment to build a 6 unit apartment house on the lot and unless some action is taken on the commitment, it will lapse and my client will be forced to loose a rather large sum of money that he paid as a deposit on the commitment. We will be at your meeting on the evening of May 29th, 1956 and we would appreciate some definite action being taken at that time. Very truly o s, r!BEEDIC A. S ER Attorney for L. L.Richardson BASss& r r � • C' C �� 1 f , 1 C 0 7,14 Y r` { Re: Variance of set back requirements for Lot 7, Block 15, FRANKLIN SUBDIVISION, South Miami, Fla. July 15f 19.55 Honorable Mayor and City Council, City of South Miami, Fla, Gentlemen* Relative to request for variance on the above property to permit set back of 19.59' from west line instead of the required 25t , and a set back of 5+ on the east line instead of the. required 15t , w* hereby ask for additional time to study this prior to submittal of our recommend- ations for the following reasons: 1. One (1) of the members of the Planning Board is out of the City and we prefer attendance of the entire Board at a meeting at which we will consider this important matter. 2. This is a vital "breakdown" of setbeck requirements and merits careful study. 3. SW 60th Court is only fifteen (15) feet wide at this point and presents a problem that also merits careful study. Therefore, the City of South Miami PLANNING BOARD here- by respectfully requests a continual oo-f—t'h-fs matter until your next 'meeting. Respectfully submitted, CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING BOARD, HGF f dsf Chairman CC: Mr* Segal H9 George f Mr. Lyons Each Councilman Mrs. . Martin (2 copies) a'Lam_ ..• •.}. _ .. _ ... b .. :.4 � J . .. r ♦ •y � ..F'T ... •... ��: - v � j% .�3 ',�-�i.; a�'.a:_ _ 'l r �L� +t� �t^,�t r,� '� �. i " r sir • 3 r a Al `d. a•,' '•�.) f ,r ?t ,, R 1. • • .1. !. - �. i 'V�a It 71l�� ,M ,fi• 5 j f`"'li, Y �. VI cp � gib.. , ,+._,. �'_` _ ,'r�• '.�:. ;-,;' h i ' Fobruary 13m 1456 Mr. Bonodict A, Silverman 228 RE Second Avonuo Miaml* Florida Dear Mr. SilvorMM: - Bo t L. Le Richardson and Val Sokoloff v Lot '87 Block 15 FRANKLIN sne 5/34 Varianee of Sot-back requirments -'This will confirm our,telephone convorsati on of .' last Fridayv Fab, 10, Au oxplained to you at -that timroa your letter of -January 20 with roforonCe to the . abovo oap tionod matter was roforrod tz ' tho first regular moeting of the City Council hold- after that datom but duo to -the fact that January had 5 Tuosdayss there wau g delay and your roquest was. duly em' sidored last Tuosdayv Fobruary 70 You aro referrod again to our letter of January 6 and t ho Planning Hoard#s letter of January 3 on- closed thorowithj, with spocial r oferonco to the paragraph ro the Slum ClearanceCommittoo+a study of tho entire araa. -Bo assurod t het your client a request is among tho matters to bo taken into con- . sidora.tion at the next mooting of that Boardp which is waiting for adoquato maps., ote, with which to come up with adoquato overall plan.. Vary truly yours, SaM Sylva 4, Martin, -City Clork BENEDICT A. SILVERMAN ATTORNEY AT LAW ©© ►/ ���� 228 N. E. 38COND AVENVF, FE B 9 MIAMI, FLORIDA TELEPHONE 82.8445 , CITY ®F s®U7v February 8, 1956 City of South Miami Office of City Clerk South Miami, Florida. Attention: Sylvia G. Martin, City Clerk Re : L. L. Richardson and Val Sokoloff Lot 87, Block 15, FRANKLIN SUB. 5/54 Variance of ,Set-Back Requirements Dear Miss Martin: May vie have the courtesy of a reply in reference to my letter of January 20th, 1956, in which letter I requested an appointment to appear before the Planning Board and/or City Commission in regard to the above styled matter. Ve truly yours, EDICT, Ae SI VERMAN BAS:sa BENEDICT A. SII.VERMAN E C E I V E 0 •f ;`� ATTORNEY AT LAW e\Z9 22B N. E. SECOND AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA JAN �3 1956 TELEPRONE 82-5445 CITY 0FS097N MUM January 20, 1956 City of South Miami Office of City Clerk South Miami, Florida. Attention: Sylvia G. Martin, City Clerk Re : L. L. Richardson and Val Sokoloff Lot. 87, Block 15, FRANKLIN SUB. 5/54 Variance of Set-Back Requirements Dear Miss Martin:: Receipt is acknowledged of your letter dated January 6th, 1956 and the enclosed copy of letter signed by H. George Fink, Chairman of the City of South Miami Planning Board. Please be advised that this office on behalf of Mr. Val Sokoloff, and Mr. L. L. Richardson, hereby request permission to appear- before the Planning Board and/or the City Commission so as to request a date at which a final decision on this matter may be had. While we have no desire to interfere with the planning of South Miami, we feel that an application that was applied for on June 10th, 1955, is entitled to have received a decision within the seven (7) months. In this, I am sure you agree. Pursuant, thereto, may we please have an appointment so as to discuss the matter in hand with the objective of arriving at some date at which a decision will be handed down. Very tr yo - - ENE IC2 A. G ILVERIVIAN BAS:sa cc: Carl Gluck, Mayor H. George Fink .January Vii=; 1956 ",Mr. Benedict A. Silverman Attorney for L. 'L.Richard-son 228 •NE Second Avenue ' r Miami, Florida Re : Li L. Richardsonf Lot 87 , Blk 15 FRANKLIN- SUED,5/54 Dear Mr. Silverman s, The .enclosed ,copy of, the.,. South oV aydi Planning' Board's report 'to the City Council, "dated. Jan. 3, 1956, °with reference to the -above captioned property' is., self, explanatory ` This report and the"requested -extension••of time were accepted.- bar the Council"at° it's regal ir-melting_•that evening, with instructions that T relay this informa- tion 'to yoz.F t + Very truly yours, ehal SQM Sylva Go Martin, City Clerk Y R*.* L..L., Richard Richardom and Val o:�. + 'Lot Block 150 FRANKLIN S'UBD.15$, Lot of Set-Back Requirements* January 3, 1936 Ronorable Myer and City Council, City of South Muni, Flow t�►tle�nt 1 4-a+ - mat-"the following it tpplar-8 on the Agenda of Xseting, Tuesday, Jan. , 1950),_ hDenedict A. Silver►°att re: LA, Richard and � Val Sokoloff - Lot d?, 81OTI . VRAWMIN BUBO., i 5,, re: Variance applied for June ltd,. 19551". R"I" to the eboye roquoestt, the Plan Roam Chairom wrote yow Ronorable Body under date of 44Y i.3, 1955 requesting additional time fir study of this setter 2nce: 1. tries der of tho Planning Hoard was out of the City; . This is a "vital bxrtakdomn of +stback zits and; 3. SW 60th Court In is o 15 foot wide at this point a� preneonts a problem that also write careful study. We, as that City of South Mod Planning Board did not proceed further with this matter since we wish to study it not as a Ss Plot of Id d but also lts-rmlatzonsmp tot or this ore& ltd r Since the Slues Clearance Comittesr is at present studying this entire area for definite a $� �R* o TRSRMRR, We, as the Plowing Board* rospectfut%"Doms t a oontinuat ion of thin matter until astWien of are towrpletrd, fooling that the --'scuous garaa variances In this area without cMilderation of the effect of same on the SRS ARRlI Vill be detrim atal. to the future developresr:t o 4=0 and rea dt in a perpotuation of that crowd" un-pi anuoi covAltion sedating at proseato q Respectfully Su"bmitt+rd, ?/air CITT OF SOUIR HMI PLANNING BOARD, Chairmen, CC: Mr, Lyons rat mrs a. Xertin�r BEI-tEDICT A; SILVERN AN ATTORNEF AT LAW a : 228 ..N. E. SECOND AVENIIS U C 10 5 $MIAMI, FLORIDA 1 TELEPHONE 82-8445 28 December 1955 b Mayor and City Council City of South Miami P. 0. Box 867 South Miami., Florida. Re : L. L. Richardson and Val Sokoloff - Lot 87, Block 15, FRANKLIN SUBDIVISION, PB 5/54. Gentlemen: Please be advised that on June 10th, 1955, Mr. Val Sokoloff, individually and in behalf of Mr. L. L. Richardson filed a petition for variance with your Zoning Board so as to be able to erect a certain six (6) unit apartment building on the above styled premises. It is the understanding of this office that the variance requested was to reduce a certain twenty-five (25) foot set-back to 19.79 feet, so as to be dble to utilize the lot for' the proposed building. As of yet, no decision: has been forthcoming, though this matter has been in the hands of your Zoning Board since the aforementioned date. Pursuant, thereto, will you please advise this office by return mail as to the status of the said petition for variance and also advise this office as to that date at which we may expect a difinite answer. V y truly yo , NEDICT Attorney for L. L. Richardson BAS:sa co ; Zoning Board City of South Miami P. 0. Box 867 South Miami, Florida. Mr. L. L. Richardson P Re Vaviancsof net back requirements for Lot 97's Block 3,5* M,,,NK. LIN WDD-jVI0j0jj,, South I: I Octobser 3, 1955 Honorable pia or and-City Coucen, Gl ty' of 3outh TUB:, 101a. Centlemens Ot July 15, 1955 the City of South Mionli platmift# Board ate you stating that tllelative to the request for variauce on the above property to pewit setback of 19.59• from west line instead of the required 259 and•a setback of 5' on the east line instead of the regrJ."e 1 1 hereby ask l. for additional time to study this prier to su tta�. of our recommendationa for the following reasons: 1. This is R vital "breakdown't of setbALck require to and merits careful shad. 2. TWt 6M Court is only fifteen (15) Feet Vd" at this point and also present a proble, that merits careful study. At that time (July 15: 1955) we requested a continuation of this utter until "your next arergular meeting-11. NO fi ��FORE, since Conditions-a r changing very rapidly In "tie c_"" c section, of our City, and we wish tee stud %h.+e fi compete overall tonditions prior to submitting n sreacmandation, we hereby regne st a continuation of this matter for a thirty ` (30) day period$ at Aich time we Will endeavor to Msent recowiondat ions not only or this partimdar case but for an o1m rail plan for the future rince tbix area was o platted faith no Idea in Mond ref the future growth '- area*. .. 3�tspect;�uc�.1�t �ubtted, CZTr OF SOU79 NWl PLAMI" SOARDO HtF fda ' Chairman f v� MINES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF T-0 CITZ CO-04CIL OF SOUTH MIAMI aELD OIL TUESDAY, OCTOBER 4, A.D. 1955 AT THE CM44UNITY BUILDING AT 8:00 P.M. Mayor Gluck called the meeting to order with all Councilmen, Attorney Proby, Clerk Martin, and Mr. Loyless, acting City Imager in the absence of Mr. Bishop, present. Councilman Corley, seconded by Councilman Bryant, moved that the minutes of the regular meeting of September 20 be adopted as indi,.,,idually read. Motion carried Councilmen Corley, seconded. by Councilman Bryant, moved that the minutes of the special meeting of September 22, recessed to September 23, be adopted as insl3-idually read. Motions carried PETITIONS & C ICATICNS: 1. Andrety Thoro ® request for change in zoning (acreage at 7600 Red Road) Counications relative to this matter were read. Councilman Tevis, seconded by Councilman Corley, moved that the request of Mr. Andrea Thoro be referred to the Planning Board and the Zoning Board for their recommendation. Motion carried 2. George L. Hollahan, Jr. , request to be heard on the Dr. K. A. Basthobu matter (E. I37k ft. Tr. 4, LARKINS FOREST AMNDED) Correspondence relative to this matter was then read to the members of the City Council.. A report of the Planning Board on this matter was also read, asking that this matter be tabled until the return of the City Manager for conference and study. Councilman Corley, seconded by Councilman Bryant, moved that the Dr. Bastholm matter be tabled until the return of the City Manager so he and the Planning Board may get to®ether . on whatever recomendations they have. Motion carried 3. William Segal, request for permission to cut a window in property line wall on second floor of Crossroads Buildih&- After some discussion the following motion took place: Councilman Bryant, seconded by Councilman Corley, moved than due to the fact that this is a temporary affair, this request be granted. Further discussion was had on the matter in which Councilman McKinney added the amendment that proper agreement in writing ` I'However, the following motion was auop ted for considera- tion by the Mayor and City Council: . "That the Chairman and other members of the Board express their sentiments with the .hope that the mayor will reappoint Mr. H. P. Bennett for a regular terra, his present term of office expiring October 15, and that the Council will approve such appointment.°8 Mayor Gluck recommended the reappointment of Mr. Bennett. Councilman Corlj3y. seconded by Councilmen WzKinney, moved that Henry Beett be reappointed to the personnel Board for a four year term. Motion carried by poll, as follows: Tevis-yeas a kkKinney-yes 9 A .is-yes, Bryant-yes; Corley-yes C. Planning Board 1. Variance of . set-back requirements for lot 87, Block 153, FRAECLIN SUBDYVIS1®Ni, s recommendation was as follows: "On July 15, 1955. the City of South Miami Planning Board wrote you stating that 'relative to the request for variance on the above property to p=mft set-back of 19.59' from west line instead of the required 25' and a set-back of 51 on the east line instead of the required 151 , we hereby ask for additional time to study this prior to submittal of our recommendations for the following reasons: 691. This is a vital breakdown of set-back require- ments and merits careful study. 082. SW 60th Court is only fifteen (15) feet wide at this point and also presents a problem that merits careful study. , t9At that times, July 159 1955, we requested a continua- tion of this titer until °your next regular meeting. ' "Now, therefore, since conditions are changing very rapidly in the colored section of our City, and we wish to study the complete overall conditions prior to submitting a recommendation, we hereby request a centtinu ation of this matter for a thirty (30) day period, at which time we will endeavor to present recommendations not only for this particular case but for an overall plan for the future since this area was originally planted with no idea in mind of the future growth of this area." Councilman McKinney, seconded by Councilman Tevis, moved that the Council grant the thirty days° extension. Motion carried � 7 � Y Re: Variance of met back reqquirements. for Lot $7, Block 15, F'RA�iR A StIBDIPISIOR, South Miaffii, Fla. July 15 1955 Honorable Mayor ,and,City Council, City of South Miami, Fla, Gentlemen: Relative to request for variance on the above property to permit set back of 19.591 from west line instead of the required 251 , and a set back of 51 on they east line owl instead of the required 151 , wk hereby ask for additional time to study this prior to submittal of our recommend- ations for the following reasons: 1. One (1) of the members of the Planning Board is out of the City and we prefer attendance of the entire Board at a meeting at which we will consider this important matter.. 2. This is a vital "breakdown" of setbeck requirements and merits careful study. 3. Sal 60th Court is only fifteen (15) feet wide at this point and presents a problem that also merits careful study. Therefore, the City of South Miami P'LANNIN'G BOAR here- by respectfully requests a continuation of this matter until your next meeting. Respectfully submitted, CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING BOARD, . RGV/daf Chairman CC: Mr. Segal . Norge Mr, Lyons Each. Councilman Mrs. Martin (2 copies) L SOUTH MIAMI ADVISORY ZONING BOARD AGENDA Jane 24,, 1955 1, Application of Lowell L. Richardson for variance of set-back requirements on Lot 97, Block 15g FRANKLIN SUBDIVISION PB 5=34, BOARDQS RECOMMENDATION: That this be referred to the Planning Board for the following reasons t That the streets in this portion of FRANKLIN SUBDIVISION are only 15 ft. in overall width and the / Zoning Board fools that before any action can be taken on the application for variance on set-back requirement,, that it should know the overall planning of street widths for this part of the subdivision. 2. Final plat of BUZ CARL ESTATES,, a subdivision in the NWJ of 3654-40 submitted by Lon Worth Crow Company BOARDIS RECOPMNDATION: That the Board rrncomnend rejoction of the proposed plat of BUZ CARL ESTATES on the same and identical grounds on which it was re- jected when it came before the Board previously insofar as the right angle turn in the canal is exactly the same as on the plat previously submitted,, that the lots are marginal in size and appear so designed in order to achieve minim= dimensions. kr )ti f N l: _11V MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF THE ADVISORY ZONING AND PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI HELD AT 8800 P.M. 24v 1955 AT THE CITY HALL Present: Edgar Shafer Chairman W. L. Garrison Robert Overman Roger Edwards R. G. Garber Ex-Officio: Sylva G. Martin City Clerk Absent: William E. Adams William A. Daniel Chairman Shafer called the meeting to order at 8:00 PeM, .and announced that the first order of business would be the appli- cation of Lowell L. Richardson for variance of setback require- ments, In view of the fact that the interested parties were not presents the following motion was made: Mre Garrison: I make a motion to table until the next meeting or until such time as the interested people are here to explain it. Mr. Edwards: I will second it, The Chairman than suggested that voting be postponed until later in the meeting as the interested parties might appear. This was agreeable to the members of the Board, The next item taken under consideration was final plat of BUZ CARL ESTATES. After a short discussion the following motion was made: Mr. Edwards* I move that we recommend rejection of the proposed . plat of BUZ CARL ESTATES on the same and identical grounds that this proposed plat was rejected when it came before us previously insofar as we do not agree with the plat in that the right angle turn in the canal is exactly the same as previously submitted to us and that the lots are marginal sizes inexact in their measure- ments and that it appears that said lots are so designed in order to achieve minimum dimensions. After a short discussion Mr. -Edwards stated as. follows: Mr, Edwards: Strike the inexact measurements, Mr. Garrison: I will second th6-;motion that was made. Further discussion followed Frith reference to possible flood con- ditions. The Chairman then asked for a. vote on the motion. All voted "aye" with the exception of Mr. Garber. Mr. Garber did not vote, later explaining that he did not feel as though be was familiar enough with the situation. The Board then directed its attention to Item No. ones, the request of Lowell Richardson, who was represented by V. Sokoloff, Mr® Garrison: Item No. One, tbo application of Lowell L. Richard- son for variance of set-back requirements on Lot 87, Block 15, FRANKLIN SUBDIVISION, PB 5-34--itss right here (indicating)-- so that they will know what we are doing--in that we have no informa- tion as to definitely what is being- requested in this variance-- City Clerk Mrs. Martin then Informed the Board that the interested ply was present and the original motion was withdrawn, as well as the second. Mr. Sokoloff was then introduced to the members of the Board and he addressed the Board in behalf of Mr. Lowell L. Richardson, - Mr. Sokoloff is a contractor. He stated that it was not his inten- tion to change the rules and regulations of the Board, but he did wish the Board to take cognizance of than fact that if the request were not granted Mr. Richardson stood to lose a good deol of money. After some further discussion Mr. Sokoloff left the rood. After due delibera ion the'foll:dwing- action was taken by the Board: Mr. Oveman: I make a motion tha we refer the application of Lowell Richardson for variance of t-back requirements on Lot 87, Block 15, FRANKLIN SUBDIVISION, and so forth, be referred to the Plann if ng Board for the following re soars: The streets injbis part FRANKLIN SUBDIVISION are foot widths. We of the Zoning � in ca Board ��el that before any actn be taken by us we should know the overa'U--Rlanning of street widths of this subdivision. Mr. Garrison: I second it* Upon voting all voted "aye" with the exception of Mr. Edwardso who abstained from votingo Mr. Edwards at 9:52 P.M. moved adjournment with Mr. Garrison seconding. �2- u RECEIVED _ 9 JUN Iii 1355 A CITY 0 SOUTH )KAN11 June 8, 1955 City of South Miami South Miami, Florida - Re: Lot 87, Block 15, FRANKLIN SUBDIVIS.L' according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 5, page 34, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida Gentlemen: We respectfully request a variance of set-back requirements of 25 feet from the west line of the property to 19.59 feet, and the set-back requirement of 15 feet from the east line of the property to 5 feet, for that plans and specifications were prepared for a six unit apartment house building, financing arranged, mortgage placed and contractor retained, with-out know- ledge of the recent change of set-back requirements . It was only when plans were presented for permit that the owner learned of recent changes in set-back require- ments. Very truly yours, Lowell L. Richardson 472 N. W. 10th Street