Loading...
1Agenda Item No:1. City Commission Agenda Item Report Meeting Date: May 15, 2018 Submitted by: Thomas Pepe Submitting Department: City Attorney Item Type: Resolution Agenda Section: RESOLUTION(S) Subject: A Resolution of the City Commission for the City of South Miami, encouraging the Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners to condition the granting of a non-use variance to Mini Warehouse of Kendall LTD on the applicant’s obtaining a non-use variance to allow non-connecting streets and “T” turn arounds within this part of the Downtown Kendall Urban Center’s Edge sub-district and denying it access to and from SW 84th Street. 3/5 (Commissioner Welsh) Suggested Action: Attachments: Reso re Barricade at SW 67 Av to SW 84 St(2).docx ApplicationandSupportingAffidavits.pdf Final Recommendation PH Z17-150(1).pdf Restrictive Covenant re 84th St barrier.pdf 22 RESOLUTION NO. _________________________ A resolutionof the City Commission for the City of South Miami, encouraging the Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners to condition the granting of a non-use variance to Mini Warehouse of Kendall LTDon the applicant’s obtaining a non-use variance toallow non-connecting streets and “T” turn arounds within this part of the Downtown Kendall Urban Center’s Edge sub-districtand denying it access to and from SW 84th Street. WHEREAS,Mini Warehouse of Kendall LTD(“Mini Warehouse”)has applied for a non-use variances of zoning regulations and the deletion of past agreements (restrictive covenants) to develop the property at 8395 SW 67 Avenuewith a mixed use building in the Downtown Kendall Urban Center District; and WHEREAS,to have the Downtown Kendall Urban Center District continue northward on US1 until it abuts the City of South Miami is not supported by the evidence in the record; and WHEREAS,the Mini Warehouseapplication indicates that existing uses to the south of the subject property are duplexes and to the east are multi-family residences, the Property Appraiser’s aerial map of the area shows that estate residential uses of the Snapper Creek Court subdivision begin 170 feet to the south of the subject property, and the single family houses of the Snapper Creek Groves subdivisionbegin 350 feet to the east of said property; and WHEREAS,on page 2 of the final recommendation for Z17-150 prepared by the Miami Dade Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources, Assistant Director Mr. Nathan Kogan stated, “staff notes there is a barricade located on SW 84 St parallel to SW 67 Av.....It should be noted that the barricade has been in existence for approximately 30 years, however no official road closure is evidenced;”and WHEREAS,Traffic Count Data taken Wednesday December 12, 1984 by the Highway Division of the Department of Public works is in existence; and WHEREAS,a letter from neighbor Ron and Elaine Neurhing to Dade County Commissioner Clare Oesterle dated June 7, 1985 indicatedthatthe barrier was erected May 31, 1985; and WHEREAS,a letter from Dade County Commissioner Clare Oesterle dated April 10, 1985 exists acknowledging the Neurhing’s work on the road closure and indicates proper steps were taken to officially close the road; and WHEREAS,abarricade blocking ingress and egress from S.W.67 Avenueonto S.W.84 Streethas been in existence forover33years, and appears to have been installed by Miami-Dade County since it includes a sidewalk separating S.W. 67th Avenue from S.W. 84th Streetand the sidewalk and the barrier has been effective at keeping trafficonS.W. 67 Avenuefrom entering 23 Page 2 of 3 the adjacent residential neighborhoods to the east, which also include the “Snapper Creek” area of the City of South Miami; and WHEREAS,to the knowledge of the representative of the local residents, no additional tragic deaths have occurred since the barricade was erected; and WHEREAS,in 2001 the City of South Miami spent over $200,000 to build a traffic calming rotunda in an attempt to calm eastbound traffic on S.W.84 Streetat 59Avenue; and WHEREAS,on page 3 of Mr.Kogan’s final recommendation hestates: “From a zoning perspective, in order to maintain the barricade, a non-Use Variance to allow non-connecting streets and “T Turnarounds” should be requested;” and WHEREAS,the City of South Miami,in order to protect its residents' health, safety and welfare,has placed a priority on eliminating cut through traffic and commercial traffic in residential neighborhoods; and WHEREAS,the Mini Warehouse of Kendall development application seeks to permit commercial and commercial-related traffic into South Miami duplex and single-family neighborhoods whereit appears that the County required the owner to record a restrictive covenant, a copy of which is attached,prohibiting any access to or from the Mini Warehouse site to 84th Streetby requiring a landscape barrier between it and the residential neighborhood to the south. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA THAT: Section 1.The City of South Miami urges the Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners to reject the request of Mini Warehouse of Kendall to allow it access to and from SW 84th Street because it will encourage the intrusion of commercial and commercial-related traffic in a stable duplex and single-family residential neighborhood. Section 2.The City of South Miami City Commission respectfully requests thatthe Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissionerscondition the granting of the variance, being requested by Mini Warehouse,on Mini Warehouse also applying for and obtaining a non- use variance to allow non-connecting streets and “T” turn arounds within this part of the Downtown Kendall Urban Center’s Edge sub-district so that the existingstreet barricade blocking ingress and egress from S.W.67 Avenueonto S.W.84 Streetcan be retained and maintained. Section 3.Severability.If any section clause, sentence, or phrase of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, the holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this resolution. Section 4.Effective Date.This resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption by vote of the City Commission. 24 Page 3 of 3 PASSED AND ADOPTED this ____ day of ______________, 2018. ATTEST:APPROVED: ________________________________________________ CITY CLERK MAYOR READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM:COMMISSION VOTE: LANGUAGE, LEGALITY AND Mayor Stoddard: EXECUTION THEREOF Vice Mayor Harris: Commissioner Welsh: Commissioner Liebman: ________________________Commissioner Gil: CITY ATTORNEY 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 4 my,-9. PI 4T.137.7-.., ' •,8.411,1 (05 1. 2,.. ..,.,- r.., - "4424 43,,;;"..4.3tr' :. DECLARATION -or REBTICY xVA COVAWAPrS t -.•• ..iy ..*n.,KNOwAti! MAN:s4 ,fSgss ilaNs808,* ::: .„,.,. • , •. •. ,.•,. , . 'TAAT, , illimao3y, INC 4 :, a ,ri.orioa'. Corporation..! (ttie. "Owiter")•• tierrig the • hol.:let . of".the fee simple 'oat : to ..0,e.::.prfipprtir .(Vhiv ...#tiove4fri !)eiisCribed.,;SS:1011.oWes`.:- ..:•:•:.... •• !:i. • • .' '3.1 .. • •. 'Bee ettached legai'description'marked BXhibit "A" :mated the following DeClaybtion of Restrictive Covenants running. ( with the property, specifying that this Restriction, during'its : lifetime, shall be for 'the benefit of, and a limitation upon, all resent and future owners Of the. roperty and for the oubiic welfare. ,-*/ 1.That the Property was• the subject of an application before the Metropolitan Dade County Board of County Commissioners "-.S. under the name of DOWNING STREET, LTD. for a distri ct boundary change from RU-5A to BV-1A,..located at the 'Northeast corner. of W.W.61th AVenUe (Ludlam Road) and S.W. 4th Street, heard under —Appl=ication No 81-35. - : 2."That the Property will be developed erstantia114, 4n accordance with the plan previously submitted to the. County entitled "A Store Building fOr Lindsley Stores,. lnc. and B. P. OVahe Products Co.." prepared by William Hamilton Arthur/ Architects, 'dated February 13, 1981, containing two sheets. That in. the site design for the proposed development,- the applicant agrees to adhere to the fl,aowing4 A.The building area will-,1-'consist of approximately square feet and-2-tru om .the property With no openings 14 • • • •• "ei 2nd - • • •a • delene• Pr epared • '•••••• iiifatiiioiaJc4,....tiEaa.C3.a; -"locate, olir*iiteit . • Roses a, Ogegatake: ' • P.A. :140k. rirteik.iI1-0vreagei pH--; • • 'Florida,. 331511• The only entries and exit filth Av 44 • a hand and . ' • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set its seal this 01Z day of April, 1984. By: ,Paz4x.oc„a. i44-ce" Title: AB5T Signed, sealed: and delivered p/NbaLE/ /NC., a in the prefience of:• Florida corporation • Attest:- Jitt 1.2143•39`. .: - • 4 ,.'• :•!..,.. ,.•.,.' -•.' C ' The •".141.441. 84th- street' 'frontage; will be lieetrilY .,'"•*- landscaPed,;,•.and if; rftitzuirWil•;•by...Dade ..CoU ty:•*.r.e7...wali',Wil:l be '.‘ • Dmi4etrUcted '• 'to 4.seriatate the proposed' fan lity . 'from the • • • •reffidenal 'Property-•t6 ,the•Sciuth; • r • it. " 1:1 • '''The ,landsciaping,'exceed::•the '• g'011314'keit • Xari4e'oaviing*.,anciethief.' baildinge riOnitrticit. obnsume lees than the permitted: gronnd coverage 'arid •?:•.• E.A wall will be cOnstrUCted: on the east aide Of the 'property to- separate existing RD-4 4 developmenat frOM the proposed new development. • '4.This Restrictive Covenant may be modified, -antended; _or released as to any portion of the. lands covered hereby, by a written instrument executed, by the then holder or holders of the fee-simple title to the lands to be affected by such modifica- tion, amendment or release, with. the a' proval by resolution of the Metropolitv Dade County Board of_Couriwy..-Sammiaaione or .Zoning Appeals Board, whichever by _law has jurisdiction the ronn4 following' a public hearing. or released, the Director- . of the., Metropolitan Dade County Building and IZoni,ng Departtnert.shall execute a written instrument effeAuating and acknowledging such modification, amendment gr release. 45 sTAfT.OF MASSACHUSETTS' • •,coiOry .og • ha:. fiaitegolAg Declare • ,•••. •+0 f tilestrictive:Covenants wasicknowlidgeir beforeme his d y,of•Artril ., 1984'. by 'flibbse.-24.' .of Lindsley 1nc, „"•a...FlorYda corporation, • lin• behalf, of the torporiation.• STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS r,y;"FitiblU e of • Massachtidatti, et large' My omission expires:- 444(2/tc..,,k,..1.1 4,4„, ...• ."%to'Adt •0, • ,•.,lit*: * • m• o • ''461,;1 •-:‘ As.% •'4.- 4: 4 'Z,",;#4 /•&tok ,,••, ,,,, , SS COUNTY OF NORFOLK • The. foregoing Declaration of Restrictive Covenants was acknowledged before me this ..23 4-‘c--- day of April, 1984, by #Ve,b...—F as A3st /of Lindsley Inc., a Florida corporation,' on behalf of the corporation.- Nft, -tr": siZ14 Notary Pubi State of•Massachnsetts at Large My commission expires: flArM. ,,,Y ,,,,, ,• .21>411C.O.:\ 0 cr,• g ic•f• 1_ ,0 46 • / 2 21 cOrim j34 ,..on.,11,w. .6.3th • PoteeueA.r 2119 t ',on tieth ,Eftide't•',16,34117 deserl*Pd t•1 .;pikuth 'et 'Aar ••theItiteeit"'1/A ;o,f 4 Of the Sce.stweet 1/2 of °143 Narthlitla ti 1 5-fieatithr 341, "!,,T$4!rkship'.54 1/4 lying South of -Stater mouth,ploidtolai lens :•tale South °feet k •Range 40 Re ..•.•ietti '•:•Rede County,.. 0:0;• tPlei5111f I ;..:.. ,— •.w....:in Myra ismoo• moo to s•aa 0011.111. naM►is SIMARD, .Bitheraflo' cola"I .; 47