Public Financial Management City_of_South_Miami_Financial_Advisory_Services_Proposal_RFQFN2014-03_Submitted_by_PFMElectronic Copy
City of South Miami
Proposal for Financial Advisory Services
RFQ #FN2014-03
December 17, 2014
The PFM Group
255 Alhambra Circle
Suite 404
Coral Gables, FL
33134
Sergio D. Masvidal
Managing Director
305-448-6992
305-448-7131 fax
masvidals@pfm.com
B. Table of Contents
C. Transmittal Letter
Page
D. Firm Overview ............................................................................................. 1
E. Personnel and References ......................................................................... 5
F. Other Relevant Financing Experience ...................................................... 10
G. Long-term Strategic Financial Planning Experience ................................ 13
H. Tax-Exempt New Money Product Experience .......................................... 16
I. Taxable Financing Experience ................................................................... 19
J. Advance and Current Refunding and Refinancing Experience ................ 22
K. Market and Pricing Information ................................................................. 25
L. Disciplinary Actions ................................................................................... 31
Appendix I. Proposal Submittal Checklist Form ............................................ 33
Appendix II. PFM’s Pricing Group ................................................................. 41
December 17, 2014
Maria M. Menendez, CMC
City Clerk
City of South Miami
Office of the City Clerk
6130 Sunset Drive
South Miami, Florida 33143
Dear Ms. Menendez,
The PFM Group (“PFM”) is pleased to submit our proposal to serve as financial advisor to the City of
South Miami, Florida (the “City”). PFM was founded over thirty-five years ago with the goal of creating an
independent financial advisory firm with technical resources matching those of the most sophisticated
Wall Street investment banks. This commitment continues today. As a result, PFM has grown to be the
leading financial advisor in the nation as well as the State of Florida. From the outset, PFM strived to be
a financial advisor that was very different from our competitors. PFM’s complete independence is
significant, but it is just the beginning of our unique qualifications. We are confident that you will find that
the breadth of our experience with local governments and the depth of our financial planning expertise
uniquely qualify PFM to serve the City as its financial advisor.
PFM is the City’s best choice to serve as its Financial Advisor because the experience and
qualifications of both our firm and project team provide the City with the highest level of service in
the industry, in addition to our local office being located within a few miles of the City.
Municipal Advisor Regulation under Dodd Frank – Effective July 1, 2014: Unlike investment banking
firms who serve as both underwriter and financial advisor, PFM serves exclusively as a financial advisor
and always has a fiduciary relationship with our clients, without any conflicts of interest. As an
independent municipal advisor, we are in full compliance with all requirements as set forth under Dodd
Frank to serve as the City’s Municipal Advisor.
Leading Advisor to Florida Cities: PFM currently serves as financial advisor to numerous Florida
municipalities (and corresponding CRAs) which include: Coral Gables, Doral, Miami, Miami Gardens,
Surfside, Boca Raton, Boynton Beach,
Pompano Beach, West Palm Beach, Coral
Springs, Delray Beach, Clermont, Daytona
Beach, Gainesville, Jacksonville, Town of
Long Boat Key, Marco Island, Melbourne,
Orlando, Ormond Beach, Town of Palm
Beach, Palatka, Panama City Beach,
Plantation, Plant City, Riviera Beach, St.
Petersburg, Sebring, Stuart, Tallahassee,
Winter Haven and Winter Park, among others.
Working with these entities on a day-to-day
basis provides us in-depth knowledge on the
issues facing local governments in today’s
uncertain economic times. This allows PFM
to provide a higher level of service than any of
our competitors and affords PFM the ability to
best serve the City as its financial advisor.
255 Alhambra Circle
Suite 404
Coral Gables, FL
33134
305-448-6992
305-448-7131 fax
www.pfm.com
2013 Full Year Florida Long Term Municipal New Issues
National Municipal Financial Advisory Ranking - Equal to Each Financial Advisor
Source: Thomson Reuters
PFM41
Raymond James 2
Public Resources Advisory
Group 4
Dunlap & Associates 14
FirstSouthwest 6
Tibor Partners 6
Fidelity Financial Services 3
RBC Capital Markets 5
Kaufman Hall & Associates
Inc 3
Hamlin Capital Advisors 1
2,669.4
2,042.3
900.5
726.1
559.7
292.2
275.7
273.9
222.0
166.5
dollars in millions# transactions
Maria M. Menendez, CMC
December 17, 2014
Page 2
Scope of Services: PFM provides decades of traditional financial advisory experience along with a broad
range of complementary services, including investment management, bond pricing, escrow structuring,
arbitrage rebate, structured products, public/private partnerships (P3) and strategic consulting such as
assistance with budgeting, workforce management and pension issues. Our expertise developing debt
management strategies has earned numerous Bond Buyer Deal of the Year awards, and more
importantly, saved our clients millions of dollars.
Experienced & Broad Team of Professionals: PFM’s team is comprised of industry leaders, led by
Sergio Masvidal, who has been one of the most active public finance professionals in Florida during the
last 10 years. Mr. Masvidal will be supported by Marissa Wortman, among others, who will provide senior
level project management support. The City will also have access to specialists in PFM’s Pricing Group,
Strategic Consulting Group, and Structured Products Group, as needed.
Local Commitment: PFM has the largest independent financial and investment advisory practice in
Florida, with more public finance professionals than any of our competitors. PFM has been committed to
this market for over a decade, and our top ranking within Florida is evidence of that footprint. In addition
to our national presence, our Miami and Orlando offices maintain a specific commitment to local
government issuers such as the City. PFM’s Miami office is located at 255 Alhambra Circle, Suite 404
Coral Gables, FL 33134, and will have primary responsibility for the engagement and is where work will
be performed. Our Coral Gables office is approximately 4 miles from City Hall, providing the City with
immediate access to our professionals.
Track Record of Performance: As the top ranked financial advisory firm in the country for the last 16
years, and in Florida for the last 14 years, PFM continues to provide our clients with highly-effective
services. In Florida in particular, we have continued to add clients seeking the value we provide. At the
same time, we have grown our presence and are fully staffed in order to provide clients with the same
level of service they are accustomed to. We have reviewed the RFP scope of work and understand what
will be required of PFM should we be fortunate enough to be selected as the City’s financial advisor. We
are ready to go to work and our team is committed to complete any and all assigned tasks in a
professional and timely manner.
Sincerely,
Public Financial Management, Inc.
Sergio D. Masvidal
Managing Director
D. Firm Overview
PFM Firm Overview
City of South Miami ~ Proposal for Financial Advisory services ~ RFQ# FN2014-03 | 1
State the full legal name and organizational structure of the firm. Describe the ownership structure of your
firm, including your firm’s affiliation with any financial institution(s). State the location of the office that will
be serving the City including mailing address and telephone numbers.
The PFM Group (“PFM”), including Public Financial Management, Inc. and PFM Asset Management LLC,
was founded in 1975 with a staff of five. Today, PFM is the nation’s leading provider of independent
financial and investment advisory services to the public sector with a staff of more than 500 professionals
located in 37 offices across the country. PFM is privately owned by its [82] Managing Directors. Financial
Advisory services for the City would be provided by the Public Financial Management, Inc. subsidiary of
The PFM Group.
PFM is the largest financial advisory firm in the public finance industry with professionals located in every
region of the country. This proximity gives us a better understanding of the local issues and problems
affecting our clients, as well as providing the day-to-day contact needed to properly meet their needs.
PFM’s Miami office will have primary responsibility for the engagement and is where work will be
performed.
Public Financial Management, Inc.
255 Alhambra Circle
Suite 404
Coral Gables, FL 33134
One key to our success in serving our clients is our ability to leverage our nationwide resources and
collaborate broadly throughout the firm. New alternatives that have worked for one client can also apply
to another client in a different region. Utilizing our technology, PFM employees communicate daily across
our offices and can easily access relevant information in a timely manner. This allows us to leverage our
institutional knowledge as a national firm and the lessons learned locally so that we may inform clients of
best practices and applications of new techniques.
PFM Firm Overview
City of South Miami ~ Proposal for Financial Advisory services ~ RFQ# FN2014-03 | 2
Our team is committed to be available to the City at any time to assist with all aspects of the financial
advisory relationship. In addition to core advisory services, when PFM is hired, our clients have access to
a full array of services offered by PFM as outlined below:
Financial Advisory Services: As a financial advisor, PFM engages in capital planning, revenue
forecasting and evaluation, resource allocation, debt management policy development and debt
transaction management (including structuring, documentation and execution). PFM delivers superior
experience and expertise that helps clients resolve the entire range of technical and financial challenges
they routinely encounter during the capital formation process. Our national reputation and consistent
growth, from $5 billion in managed debt transactions in 1986 to over $46 billion at in 2013, reflects our
clients’ recognition of our capabilities and the value we add.
Investment Management: PFM Asset Management LLC (“PFMAM”) is devoted primarily to providing
investment advice and portfolio management for governmental and not-for-profit organizations,
corporations, pension funds and other institutions. As an investment manager, PFMAM brings a
comprehensive spectrum of services to the business of money management. Managing both investment
pools and individual client portfolios designed to earn competitive yields - while maximizing safety and
liquidity, PFMAM’s services include timely market-driven portfolio management, portfolio design, state-of-
the-art accounting and arbitrage rebate calculation services. The value of this service to clients is evident
in the growth of assets under our management, from $1 billion in 1986 to over $50 billion as of December
31, 2013. PFM Asset Management LLC is registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
Investment Consulting: PFM Advisors is a specialized component division of PFM Asset Management
LLC providing investment and retirement plan consulting services to pension funds, endowments and
similar funds. We believe that a true partnership with our clients can only be achieved by fully
understanding the unique characteristics of their funds. Therefore, our ability to structure simple, reliable,
and fundamentally sound asset and retirement planning management strategies results in predictable
Pro Forma Cash Flow
Long Term Debt Management Plans
Long Term Credit Strategies
Debt Policy Development
Debt Capacity
Project Feasibility Analysis
Capital Budget Development
Competitive Contracting
Benchmarking
Performance Measurement
Targeted Budgeting
Securitization of Delinquent Assets
Revenue Enhancement
Strategic Municipal Consulting
Lease Negotiation
Investment Alternatives
Fixed-Income Portfolio
Management
Cash Management
Policy Development
Cash Flow Forecasting
Accounting/Record Keeping Services
Competitive Bidding Services
Transaction Management
PFMPFM
Range ofRange of
ServiceService
Quantitative Strategies
and Structured ProductsFinancial Planning
Debt Transaction
Management
Investment Consulting
and Management
Strategic Municipal
Operations and Management
Consulting
Asset/Liability Management
Bond Proceeds Investment Management
Arbitrage Rebate Compliance
Structure Investment Products
Escrow Structuring/Restructuring
Swaps and Derivative Products
Interest Rate Risk Analysis
Financing Schedule
Negotiated vs. Competitive
Financing Alternatives
Bond Documents
Credit Rating Presentation
Closing
Debt Structuring
Financing Team Selection
Financing Terms
Marketing Plan
Bond Pricing
Pro Forma Cash Flow
Long Term Debt Management Plans
Long Term Credit Strategies
Debt Policy Development
Debt Capacity
Project Feasibility Analysis
Capital Budget Development
Competitive Contracting
Benchmarking
Performance Measurement
Targeted Budgeting
Securitization of Delinquent Assets
Revenue Enhancement
Strategic Municipal Consulting
Lease Negotiation
Investment Alternatives
Fixed-Income Portfolio
Management
Cash Management
Policy Development
Cash Flow Forecasting
Accounting/Record Keeping Services
Competitive Bidding Services
Transaction Management
PFMPFM
Range ofRange of
ServiceService
Quantitative Strategies
and Structured ProductsFinancial Planning
Debt Transaction
Management
Investment Consulting
and Management
Strategic Municipal
Operations and Management
Consulting
Asset/Liability Management
Bond Proceeds Investment Management
Arbitrage Rebate Compliance
Structure Investment Products
Escrow Structuring/Restructuring
Swaps and Derivative Products
Interest Rate Risk Analysis
Financing Schedule
Negotiated vs. Competitive
Financing Alternatives
Bond Documents
Credit Rating Presentation
Closing
Debt Structuring
Financing Team Selection
Financing Terms
Marketing Plan
Bond Pricing
PFM Firm Overview
City of South Miami ~ Proposal for Financial Advisory services ~ RFQ# FN2014-03 | 3
investment returns, sound vendor services and few surprises. PFM Advisors’ clients include public funds,
Taft-Hartley funds, corporate funds, hospitals, foundations and endowment funds.
Management & Budget Consulting: As a strategic consultant, PFM offers its clients the most effective
capital and operating budget advice available. We have a proven track record in using various
techniques for performance management, benchmarking, revenue enhancement and privatization. From
Washington, D.C. to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to the City of Miami, PFM helps leaders chart a
path through each phase of fiscal health. From financial distress to balance…from balance that is
temporary to that which can be sustained…from sustainability to expanded coverage and excellent
quality, PFM produces results for our clients. PFM offers a long-term budget forecasting tool that
provides our clients with a custom-built financial model that allows budget initiatives to be evaluated in
real-time.
Client Training Services: PFM believes that the most successful clients and the most effective
governmental administrators are those that understand how we operate and know how to use PFM to add
value to their operation. In this regard, PFM offers a free, intensive week-long training course for our
clients at our state of the art training center in Philadelphia at least once a year. Also, beginning in 2013,
PFM has started doing regional week-long training seminars once a year for those unable to attend the
Philadelphia training session. During this week, finance directors, treasurers and other senior staff from
our clients around the nation spend a full eight to ten hours a day learning the intricacies of bond math,
the pricing of bonds, investment techniques, interest rate swaps and arbitrage regulations. Sometimes
we expand this training to include on-site sessions for Boards of Directors or other policy makers so that
they too can better understand the impact of their decisions.
Locally, PFM Asset Management offers investment training seminars multiple times per year that are
registered with the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy (NASBA) as a sponsor of
continuing professional education on the National Registry of CPE Sponsors. These seminars give
clients the opportunity to fulfill their required CPE credits while staying abreast of the ever-evolving
investment markets.
PFM has been the nation’s number one ranked financial advisor for sixteen consecutive years,
completing over 12,000 transactions with a par amount in excess of $426 billion. In the last five years
alone, PFM advised on 4,365 transactions with a par amount in excess of $262.4 billion.
2009 - 2013 Overall Long Term Municipal New Issues
National Municipal Financial Advisory Ranking - Equal to Each Financial Advisor
Source: Thomson Reuters
PFM4,365
Public Resources Advisory
Group 743
FirstSouthwest 3,268
Lamont Financial Services
Corp 246
Govt Development Bank for
Puerto Rico 61
RBC Capital Markets 909
Acacia Financial Group Inc 636
A C Advisory Inc 226
Kaufman Hall & Associates
Inc 330
Montague DeRose &
Associates LLC 160
262,458.7
151,870.3
114,353.1
42,313.9
34,416.9
33,689.5
32,290.0
32,217.8
30,565.3
28,291.9
dollars in millions# transactions
PFM’s Day-to-Day Contact
City of South Miami ~ Proposal for Financial Advisory services ~ RFQ# FN2014-03 | 4
a. Name of Firm submitting the proposal.
Public Financial Management, Inc.
b. Name and title of individual responsible for proposal.
Sergio Masvidal, a Managing Director in PFM’s Miami office, will be engagement manager and day-to-day
contact the engagement.
c. Mailing address.
PFM’s Miami office will have primary responsibility for the engagement and is where work will be
performed.
Public Financial Management, Inc.
255 Alhambra Circle
Suite 404
Coral Gables, FL 33134
d. Telephone and facsimile numbers.
Telephone: (305) 448-6992
Fax: (305) 448-7131
E. Personnel and References
PFM’s Personnel
City of South Miami ~ Proposal for Financial Advisory services ~ RFQ# FN2014-03 | 6
Identify the primary individuals who will provide services to the City with regard to the day-to-day
relationship with the City and include a brief resume for each of the primary individuals including licenses
and certifications held by those individuals.
Sergio D. Masvidal, a Managing Director in the Miami office, will serve as the engagement manager for
this relationship. Mr. Masvidal specializes in Florida municipal finance for cities, counties and special
authorities/CRA’s, managing over $8 billion of debt transactions over the last 10 years. Mr. Masvidal
deploys a significant amount of resources and effort to our local South Florida clients.
Marissa Wortman, a Senior Managing Consultant in the Miami office, will provide senior project support
for the engagement. Ms. Wortman specializes in Florida municipal finance for counties, cities, authorities,
airports, seaports and colleges and has managed over $6 billion in financings over the last 12 years.
David Moore, a Managing Director in the Orlando office, will provide management support for this
engagement. Mr. Moore is one of the most seasoned finance professionals in Florida, providing financial
advisory services to a vast array of cities, counties, and school districts. Mr. Moore has managed over
$15 billion of debt transactions during the last 22 years.
James W. Glover, a Managing Director in the Orlando office, will provide management support for this
relationship. Mr. Glover specializes in Florida municipal finance for cities, counties, school districts and a
variety of authorities. Mr. Glover has managed over $10 billion in financings over the last 14 years.
Pedro Varona, an Analyst in the Miami office, will assist Mr. Masvidal and provide analytical and
technical support for the City’s engagement.
PFM’s Florida Experience
City of South Miami ~ Proposal for Financial Advisory services ~ RFQ# FN2014-03 | 7
Provide a list of five clients the firm has worked with in the last 36 months. Indicate the firm’s experience
with clients within the State of Florida and provide a brief description of the type of services provided as
well as the names, titles, addresses and telephone numbers of those primarily responsible for the
account. In addition to the day-to-day relationship, please provide information regarding the firm’s and
individual’s experience with transactions which are similar to financings contemplated by the City (i.e.
taxable or tax-exempt new money issues, variable rate financings, commercial paper, etc.) If the firm
and/or individuals have experience with transactions within the State of Florida, please include those
clients as references.
Below please find a listing of five Florida clients that we believe are of relevance to what the City is
seeking in terms of experience and qualifications. On the following pages is a complete listing of our
current clients in Florida. As stated throughout the proposal, our depth of resources and knowledge with
issues in the state are unparalleled, partially because our client base requires that we stay aware of
financing techniques and funding alternatives.
City of Coral Springs, Florida
9551 West Sample Road
Coral Springs, FL 33065
Melissa Heller, Director of Financial Services
(954) 344-1087
FNMPH@coralsprings.org
Engagement/Project Manager: Sergio Masvidal
Services Provided: Financial Advisory, Long-Term Planning, Budget Forecast modeling, General
Obligation Referendum planning, Debt Structuring and Optimization, Credit Rating Management
Similar Transactions: Tax-exempt new money, tax-exempt refunding, special obligation revenue
bonds, direct bank placement (bank loan). $9,441,272 Par amount advised on over last 12
months
City of Miami
444 SW 2nd Ave
Miami, FL 33130
Fernando Casamayor, CFO/Asst City Manager
(305) 416-1009
FCasamayor@miamigov.com
Engagement/Project Manager: Sergio Masvidal
Services Provided: Financial Advisory, Long-Term Planning, Budget Forecast, Debt Structuring
and Optimization, Credit Rating Management
Similar Transactions: Tax-exempt new money, tax-exempt refunding, special obligation revenue
bonds, CRA revenue bonds, direct bank placement (bank loan). $73,934,380 Par amount
advised over last 12 months, including CRA issuances
PFM’s Florida Experience
City of South Miami ~ Proposal for Financial Advisory services ~ RFQ# FN2014-03 | 8
Miami-Dade County
111 NW 1st Street, Suite 2550
Miami, FL 33128-1995
Arlesa Leverette, Senior Bond Analyst
(305) 375-2275
al2@miamidade.gov
Engagement/Project Manager: Sergio Masvidal
Services Provided: Financial Advisory, Long-Term Planning, Budget Forecast, General Obligation
Referendum planning, Debt Structuring and Optimization, Credit Rating Management
Similar Transactions: Tax-exempt new money, tax-exempt refunding, taxable new money,
taxable refunding, commercial paper program, conduit issuance, special obligation revenue
bonds, direct bank placement (bank loan). $39,380,000 Par amount advised over last 12 months
School Board of Miami-Dade County
1450 NE 2nd Avenue
Miami, FL 33132
Leo Fernandez, Treasurer
(305) 995-1633
leofernandez@dadeschools.net
Engagement/Project Manager: Sergio Masvidal
Services Provided: Financial Advisory, Long-Term Planning, Budget Forecast, Debt Structuring
and Optimization, Credit Rating Management
Similar Transactions: Tax-exempt new money, tax-exempt refunding, commercial paper program
analysis, general obligation referendum planning, conduit issuance, variable rate financing, short-
term put structured financing, direct bank placement (bank loan). $700,190,000 Par amount
advised over last 12 months
City of Pompano Beach, Florida
100 W. Atlantic Blvd.; Room 480
Pompano Beach, FL 33060
Suzette Sibble, Finance Director
(954) 786-4680
suzette.sibble@copbfl.com
Engagement/Project Manager: Sergio Masvidal
Services Provided: Financial Advisory, Long-Term Planning, Budget Forecast, Debt Structuring
and Optimization, Credit Rating Management
Similar Transactions: Tax-exempt new money, tax-exempt refunding, conduit issuance, CRA
revenue bonds, SRF revolving loan program, direct bank placement (bank loan). $17,355,000
Par amount advised over last 12 months
PFM’s Florida Experience
City of South Miami ~ Proposal for Financial Advisory services ~ RFQ# FN2014-03 | 9
PFM has consistently been the leading financial advisor in the State of Florida. A representative listing of
our current Florida clients is provided below. In addition,
the tables to the right and below show the number of
transactions and par amount of deals completed in
Florida, which has resulted in PFM being the #1 ranked
financial advisor in Florida each year from 2001 to 2013.
This trend continues in 2014.
We feel that it is our unique blend of national presence,
local understanding and commitment, and the ability to
offer completely independent financial advice that truly
sets us apart from our competitors. To better serve our
clients, we continue to add resources to the firm despite
the significant turmoil in the financial markets. While our
competitors are downsizing, PFM continues to grow in
order to better service our clients.
Higher Education
Edison State College
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical
University
Flagler College
Jacksonville University
New College
Nova Southeastern University
Ringling College of Art
and Design
Saint Leo University
Stetson University
University of South Florida
University of West Florida
Cities
Alachua
Boca Raton
Boynton Beach
Brooksville
Clermont
Cocoa Beach
Coral Gables
Coral Springs
Crystal River
Daytona Beach
Delray Beach
Doral
Flagler Beach
Gainesville
Golden Beach
Jacksonville
Key West
Lake Wales
Longboat Key
Marco Island
Melbourne
Melbourne Beach
Miami
Newberry
New Port Richey
Oldsmar
Ormond Beach
Palatka
Palm Beach
Panama City
Beach
Plant City
Plantation
Pompano Beach
St. Cloud
St. Petersburg
Sanibel
Sebring
Stuart
Sunrise
Surfside
Tallahassee
Tarpon Springs
Titusville
West Palm Beach
Winter Haven
Winter Garden
Winter Park
WinterSprings
Counties
Alachua
Brevard
Broward
Clay
Collier
Flagler
Highlands
Leon
Marion
Miami-Dade
Monroe
Orange
Osceola
Palm Beach
Sarasota
St. Johns
St. Lucie
Volusia
Walton
School Districts
Broward
Citrus
Columbia
Duval
Flagler
Hernando
Lake
Manatee
Marion
Martin
Miami-Dade
Orange
Palm Beach
Pasco
Sarasota
Santa Rosa
Seminole
Volusia
Walton
Other Authorities
First Florida Governmental
Financing Commission
South Florida Water
Management District
Sunshine State Governmental
Financing Commission
Tampa Bay Water
Special Districts
Alachua Library District
Blueprint 2000
Lake Worth Drainage District
Healthcare
Adventist Health System
Jackson Health System
Naples Community Hospital
North Broward Hospital District
OneBlood, Inc.
Orange County Health Facilities
Authority
Transportation
Jacksonville Aviation Authority
Jacksonville Seaport Authority
Lee County Port Authority
Okaloosa County (Northwest
Florida Regional Airport)
Central Florida Expressway
Authority
Hillsborough County Aviation
Authority
Tampa Port Authority
Utilities
Gainesville Regional
Utilities
Jacksonville Electric
Authority
Orlando Utilities
Commission
The State of Florida
Division of Bond
Finance
Department of
Transportation
2009 - 2013 Florida Long Term Municipal New Issues
National Municipal Financial Advisory Ranking - Equal to Each Financial Advisor
Source: Thomson Reuters
PFM293
Raymond James 28
FirstSouthwest 55
Public Resources Advisory
Group 41
Dunlap & Associates 71
RBC Capital Markets 46
Spectrum Municipal Services
Inc 19
Kaufman Hall & Associates
Inc 20
Frasca & Associates 6
Fidelity Financial Services 23
20,662.0
8,395.5
5,189.9
4,099.6
2,645.5
2,206.4
2,096.0
1,725.7
1,359.7
1,180.7
dollars in millions# transactions
F. Other Relevant Financing Experience
PFM’s City Engagement Experience
City of South Miami ~ Proposal for Financial Advisory services ~ RFQ# FN2014-03 | 11
Provide a description of your proposed primary individuals’ relevant experience over the last three years
with other cities that you believe are relevant to this proposed engagement. Include three case studies, if
available, that illustrate experience with relevant services where the proposed primary individuals have
served as financial advisor. Please limit your response to two pages.
Over the last three years, Mr. Masvidal has worked with a variety of clients in Florida, particularly in the
South Florida area. In Miami-Dade County alone, Mr. Masvidal has worked with the City of Miami, City of
Miami Gardens, Town of Surfside, City of Coral Gables, and City of Doral, along with other municipal
entities such as the County and School District. Below are three case studies where Mr. Masvidal and
PFM have added significant value to city clients in the South Florida area.
City of Miami 2010 to Present
PFM was initially hired by the City of Miami in 2010, after the housing collapse and the
resultant height of their budget deficit and labor unrest, to specifically serve as a
Management and Budget consultant in order to assist the City in mapping out a strategic
long-term plan that would address the structural deficiency in the budget, as well as the
growing pension and labor costs. Immediately upon being hired, our Management and
Budget Consulting (“MBC”) group worked with the City’s management team to
forensically determine the historical budgetary deficiencies between revenue and
expense items. In addition, PFM was tasked with reviewing existing labor and pension agreements, as
well as projecting those cost centers into the future. Over the course of two years working alongside City
management, PFM prepared a long-term strategic plan that addressed a structurally sound budget,
assisted the City to renegotiate labor contracts and pension plans, and presented our findings to the City
Commission over multiple meetings. Shortly after, PFM was hired as the City’s Financial Advisor to assist
in refinancing a $50 million bullet maturity that came due within six months. PFM quickly assembled the
finance team and plan of finance in order to refinance the loan. Because the City was under an active
SEC investigation, the plan of finance was carefully tailored to only be marketed to Qualified Institutional
Buyers, and ultimately resulted in a twenty-year borrowing with a True Interest Cost (“TIC”) of less than
4%. In August of 2014 PFM also completed the first financing for the City’s SEOPW CRA with a par
amount of $55 million, as well as an $18 million refinancing for the City that resulted in $1.2 million of Net
Present Value savings, or the equivalent of approximately $400,000 of annual cash flow relief.
City of Miami Gardens 2014 to Present
One of our newest clients, PFM was hired by the City of Miami Gardens as Financial
Advisor in April 2014. The City was an infrequent issuer who had plans to issue new
money debt in 2014, and thus the City hired PFM to manage the debt issuance process.
PFM worked through the issuance of $60 million of general obligation debt, which
required a brand new ordinance and a referendum to issue the bonds. As this was a new
credit, PFM assisted the City throughout the process of acquiring new ratings, including
preparing a comprehensive rating presentation for review by the agencies and hosting rating agency
calls. The working group’s efforts were rewarded by achieving A1 / A+ ratings from Moody’s and S&P,
respectively.
During bond pricing, PFM and the underwriter negotiated the initial spreads to market the bonds, and
participated alongside the senior manager as we received investor feedback regarding the structure of
the bonds. PFM and the underwriter agreed to change the couponing structure and incorporate certain
maturities into term bonds in order to meet investor demand. Market reception for the bonds was strong,
and PFM’s Pricing Group negotiated to lower yields in certain maturities in order to save the City money
in the form of reduced annual debt service. With adjustments, the Miami Gardens pricing ended up
comparing favorably to similar credits that priced on the same day.
Throughout the process, PFM was able to leverage its strong relationship with various service providers
to receive discounts on behalf of the City, shaving thousands of dollars off of the costs of issuance of the
PFM’s City Engagement Experience
City of South Miami ~ Proposal for Financial Advisory services ~ RFQ# FN2014-03 | 12
bonds. Given that the City was on a strict budget regarding issuance costs, every dollar counted, and this
effort was much appreciated by the City.
City of Pompano Beach 2010 to Present
PFM has served as Financial Advisor and has assisted the City of Pompano Beach with
bond financings related to both the City and their CRA. Recent projects include a $20
million parallel loan structure that enabled the City to move forward with the development
or projects in their Northwest CRA, as detailed below.
One of our first tasks for the CRA was to evaluate their capital improvement and
implementation plans in order to develop a detailed financing plan that could be
introduced to the Council and CRA Board. Upon reviewing the Capital Improvement Plan needs, PFM
quickly assessed two key items: the tax-exempt eligibility of the projects and the ability to stagger the
timing of the financings in order to minimize the impact of debt service in the first year while projects were
still coming on-line.
PFM worked with the City, the CRA, and the other members of the financing team through the following
steps:
Detailed multi-year Plan of Finance
Board memorandums and presentations to communicate the plan of finance to policy makers
Request for Proposals for interested lenders
Negotiated borrowing terms with the selected bank
Review of the Bond documents
Because the plan of finance could be most efficiently implemented through two financings that would
occur several months apart, PFM wanted to ensure that the CRA (1) had access to capital when the
project scheduled dictated, and (2) had a borrowing in place that could be drawn upon at a reasonable
cost at a future date. To this extent, PFM developed a multi-pronged plan of finance. The first borrowing
was implemented so that all of the known tax-exempt projects were funded at closing. The second
financing was structured in such a manner that the CRA had the ability to draw from one of two Lines of
Credit. Due to the early stage of the project negotiations for the second piece, it could not be determined
whether the project would be taxable or tax-exempt eligible. Therefore, the Lines of Credit were
established – with no ongoing “carry” cost – to be drawn at a later date. The agreement with the lending
bank detailed that at the point a draw was made on the line, the CRA could simply notify the bank as to
whether the draw would be considered taxable (drawn from the taxable line) or tax-exempt (drawn from
the tax-exempt line). Using this methodology the CRA was afforded future flexibility while it continued to
negotiate agreements with other private developers.
PFM is recently negotiated on behalf of the City/CRA with their two lenders in order to refinance existing
obligations and issue new money financing. The crux of these negotiations centered on waiving certain
prepayment provisions that were included in those loans when they were initially put in place.
Most recently, PFM assisted the City in completing a refunding of their Series 2006 Water & Sewer
Revenue Bonds for net present value savings. The refunding provided the City with an average over
$400,000 of cash flow relief per year, as well as afforded the City an opportunity to update their Water &
Sewer Ordinance with more modern language and covenants. Looking forward, the City is looking to
finance the construction of an approximately 500-space City Parking Garage located on a site currently
owned by the City. The structure for this issuance will be Certificates of Participation, a relatively unique
use of this financing structure. PFM determined that the use of COPs would provide the strongest security
for prospective financing providers, thus earning the City the lowest possible rates.
G. Long-term Strategic Financial Planning Experience
PFM’s Long-term Strategic Financial Planning Experience
City of South Miami ~ Proposal for Financial Advisory services ~ RFQ# FN2014-03 | 14
Please describe your short and medium term outlook for the municipal markets and, financial institutions,
in general; and how it may affect cities borrowing. Based on your knowledge of the City’s financial
circumstances using the City’s most recent CAFR provided online, other relevant factors such as Federal
government actions or Congressional legislation and your outlook as previously described, please provide
an overview of the strategies that the City and Staff should consider to improve the City’s financial
position. Please limit your response to two pages.
As described throughout our proposal, as the preeminent financial advisory firm to state and local
governments throughout the United States, PFM has the advantage of real-time, tangible market
developments that may be impactful to our clients. Throughout our 35 year history there have been
multiple instances of PFM’s market awareness being applied for our client’s benefit. Through our
presence in the market, we work diligently to ensure that our clients stay ahead of the curve. PFM is the
only independent financial advisory firm that dedicates specialized resources to address our municipal
clients’ needs. Our Pricing Group, for example, provides our clients with our independent views on trends
occurring in the capital markets on a weekly basis. In 2009, Instead of waiting for the American Recovery
Act programs to develop, PFM proactively “went to bat” in Washington, DC to fight for our clients. We
helped shape the initiatives (BABs, QSCB, Recovery Zone Bonds, etc) so that we could advise clients
accurately, while avoiding the “hype” that accompanied the initial release of the programs. We were able
to advise clients regarding when to move quickly and when to take a wait and see approach. Another
example of our knowledge being applied for the benefit of our clients was in 2007-2008. PFM Asset
Management stepped in to educate clients regarding what was really happening with the State Board of
Administration’s local government investment pool, so that our clients could make rational decisions on
the safety of the pool assets – in advance of the pending liquidity crisis that ultimately froze the invested
funds of many local governments.
In terms of the municipal market outlook, for the last several years most financial firms had projected
interest rates to rise by this point. However the slower recovery, global economic concerns, and slack in
employment figures have kept interest rates low. Up to this point, the markets have reacted with a flight to
quality and maintained attractive pricing on US Treasury bonds. We have advised many clients to take
advantage of the historically low rate environment, either for new borrowing or, more prevalently, to
refinance existing debt to provide interest rate savings or improved loan terms. Please see Appendix II
for snapshots from our Pricing Group’s most recent market update.
In terms of the City’s financial position, our initial review of the 2013 CAFR and recently approved 2015
Budget do not raise any immediate concerns in terms of credit ratings or potential impacts from federal
actions. The City maintains a healthy fund balance in excess of 50% of the General Fund budget, which
is of high credit quality for a City the size of South Miami. It appears that the budget is structurally
balanced, without the use of significant one-time revenues to maintain recurring expenses, which is
another credit positive.
One item that would likely be of service to the City as it continues to develop long-range strategies is to
begin to prepare a multi-year budgeting tool. Multi-year planning is a best practice recommended by the
Government Finance Officers Association, as well as a positive rating factor for all three rating agencies.
As summarized in Standard & Poor’s July 2012 report The Top 10 Management Characteristics of Highly
Rated U.S. Public Finance Issuers, “Multi-year planning is a critical exercise. These plans will often have
out-year gaps projected which allows governments to work out, in advance, the optimal way to restore
fiscal balance.” PFM employs a three-step approach to multi-year financial and strategic planning:
1. Baseline Assessment,
2. Initiatives Development, and
3. Management and Monitoring (i.e., Implementation).
Underpinning the long-term strategic planning process is a customized project projection model that
projects future financial performance.
PFM’s Long-term Strategic Financial Planning Experience
City of South Miami ~ Proposal for Financial Advisory services ~ RFQ# FN2014-03 | 15
PFM’s Customized Budget Projection Model for Local Government
The budget projection model uses financial records and management insight to project a future financial
state given a series of underlying – and dynamic – user generated assumptions. PFM does not deploy a
“once size fits all” approach to model development. Rather, each budget projection model is customized
to match a jurisdiction’s budget structure. Data points are presented, using various reporting features, in
ways which are most relevant and meaningful to stakeholders in each individual engagement.
The PFM Budget Projection Model can serve as the foundation for a full-scale long-term financial and
planning engagement, or a stand-alone budget forecast tool. Components include:
Budget Analysis and Forecasting Capabilities: quickly analyze historical budget growth trends
with dynamic user-generated assumptions;
Policy Initiative Impact Modeling: generate “what if” projections reflecting structural changes that
may occur over the forecast period (e.g., issuing of long-term debt, changes to OPEB or pension
structure, etc.)
Scenario Comparison: create, save, and compare different combinations of policy choices,
staffing levels, growth rate assumptions, etc.
Reporting Features: department-by-department comparisons, dashboards, rating agency key
metrics
PFM designs Budget Projection Models that are iterative – i.e., users can easily manipulate underlying
assumptions to generate alternative scenarios – and are designed to be updated annually. Additionally,
the PFM Budget Projection Model can integrate capital planning activities and enterprise fund activity to
provide the user with a holistic perspective of all governmental operations. The following figures represent
screenshots of budget projection models developed for PFM clients throughout the country. Again, PFM
creates tailored and customized models to meet the unique needs of each client.
H. Tax-Exempt New Money Product Experience
PFM’s Tax-Exempt Financing Experience
City of South Miami ~ Proposal for Financial Advisory services ~ RFQ# FN2014-03 | 17
Describe your firm’s relevant experience with tax-exempt new money transactions including special
facility obligations and parking systems over the last three years. Include three case studies, if available,
that illustrate the firm’s experience with relevant transactions where the proposed firm has served as
financial advisor. Please limit your response to two pages
The following table clearly depicts and reiterates that the primary team comprised of PFM’s Florida
professionals serves as the most active and experienced financial advisors in Florida. In addition, PFM’s
overall ranking in the nation since 2011 is provided. Both exhibit our strength in terms of financial
advisory firm rankings in the tax-exempt sphere.
2011 - 2013 Florida Tax-Exempt Long Term Municipal New Issues
National Municipal Financial Advisory Ranking - Equal to Each Financial Advisor
Source: Thomson Reuters
PFM147
Raymond James 10
Public Resources Advisory
Group 15
FirstSouthwest 21
Dunlap & Associates 32
RBC Capital Markets 18
Spectrum Municipal Services
Inc 10
Kaufman Hall & Associates
Inc 10
Fidelity Financial Services 11
Ford & Associates 10
11,672.7
2,278.8
1,853.0
1,831.0
1,489.9
1,040.8
916.8
828.5
762.9
604.4
dollars in millions# transactions
2011 - 2013 Tax-Exempt Long Term Municipal New Issues
National Municipal Financial Advisory Ranking - Equal to Each Financial Advisor
Source: Thomson Reuters
PFM2,141
Public Resources Advisory
Group 342
FirstSouthwest 1,828
Lamont Financial Services
Corp 142
Acacia Financial Group Inc 363
Piper Jaffray & Co 616
RBC Capital Markets 477
Govt Development Bank for
Puerto Rico 29
A C Advisory Inc 105
KNN Public Finance 151
130,122.4
73,384.3
57,268.5
27,860.8
20,598.3
17,408.2
13,749.5
13,625.2
13,411.7
12,865.1
dollars in millions# transactions
PFM’s Tax-Exempt Financing Experience
City of South Miami ~ Proposal for Financial Advisory services ~ RFQ# FN2014-03 | 18
City of Coral Springs 2012 to Present
PFM was hired by the City of Coral Springs as Financial Advisor in late 2012.
Immediately after being hired, PFM worked through the procurement and closing of a
Bank Qualified private placement to fund capital projects for the City’s Water and Sewer
System. PFM was able to complete the 2012 Water and Sewer financing in a very short
time frame (five weeks from learning of the project to closing) in order to close the
financing before the end of the 2012 calendar year, and meet the City’s request to
secure the private placement as Bank Qualified. In addition to the 2012 Water and
Sewer financing, PFM has assisted with an additional 5 financings and is in the process of advising the
City through a General Obligation Financing set to close in early 2015.
Town of Surfside, Florida 2010 to Present
PFM has served as Financial Advisor and has assisted the Town of Surfside with bond
financings related to their Utility system. The Town is recently was in the process of
implementing a large utility system improvement project that encompasses the entire
Town footprint. PFM worked with the Town to develop a plan of finance that was within
the constraints of their rate consultant’s long-term plan. PFM assisted the Town to
procure, negotiate, and secure a long-term direct bank placement to fund this capital
project. The distinct feature of that borrowing was that initially the bank lender did not
want to offer any prepayment terms without an additional cost. However, PFM and the Town had insight
to the fact that it was very likely that an SRF loan would be made available at a future date. SRF loans,
while potentially having more restrictive conditions, i.e. “Buy American,” typically provide a lower cost of
borrowing than commercial markets. As a result of that knowledge, PFM negotiated an optional
prepayment on a portion of the loan equal to the expected amount of the SRF loan proceeds. One critical
feature of that negotiation was that we were able to negotiate prepayment flexibility in that the Town could
choose to refinance any portion of the loan (pro rata) or only specific maturities (the final 5-7 years of the
loan.
As an additional enhancement to the plan of finance, the lending bank offered a lower rate if the Town
was willing to accept an early “put” feature, meaning there would be a balloon payment due in year 10 in
the amount of the final 7 years of the loan. Knowing that the Town had secured future SRF funds, we
agreed to the early put feature, and at the time the SRF funds were received eight months later, we
moved forward in defeasing the final 7 years of the loan, effectively removing that risk from the Town.
Gonzaga University 2008 to Present
PFM assisted Gonzaga University in a unique financing that raised capital
for the construction of a parking garage, new retail center, and bookstore
(the “Project”). These facilities were being constructed in order to support a
new multipurpose University Center, expected to open in 2015. The loan
was issued through the Washington Higher Education Facilities Authority.
The financing was issued in two series (taxable and tax-exempt) and designed to be flexible to change at
future dates based on the facility usage. Initially, the retail center portion of the Project was used to house
student dining facilities, during which time 100% of the interest on the Loan qualifies as tax-exempt. In the
fall of 2015, the University expects the student dining usage to be transferred to the new University
Center building and the retail center portion will then be leased to commercial establishments,
necessitating a change from tax-exempt to taxable financing for that portion of the Loan. PFM worked
with the University to craft a plan of finance that would allow such a conversion to take place, and created
a request for proposals that detailed such a plan.
Upon review of the proposals, PFM and the issuer determined that Union Bank provided the proposal
most favorable to the issuer. Union Bank offered a tax-exempt direct placement loan with provisions for
the conversion to a taxable loan after a certain period of time.
I. Taxable Financing Experience
PFM’s Taxable Financing Experience
City of South Miami ~ Proposal for Financial Advisory services ~ RFQ# FN2014-03 | 20
Describe your firm’s relevant experience with taxable financing including parking system transactions over
the last three years. Include three case studies, if available, that illustrate the firm’s experience with
relevant transactions where the proposed firm has served as financial advisor. Please limit your response
to two pages.
The following tables provide PFM’s recent taxable bond experience. Please note that rankings are listed
in terms of total par amount. However, note that the charts below also list the number of transactions
completed. PFM leads the competition in transactions issued and has completed over twice the number
of taxable transactions compared to other firms.
We have advised issuers on the use of taxable debt to achieve a wide range of objectives, including the
simple funding of taxable needs, the diversification of investor and debt types, more accurate matching of
assets and liabilities, the economic avoidance of transferred proceeds penalties, the realization of
amortization requirements, and the lowering of taxable costs. Some of the taxable products we have
advised clients on include: Fixed Rate New Money Debt, Fixed Rate Refunding Bonds, and Adjustable-
Rate Debt.
2011 - 2013 Taxable Long Term Municipal New Issues
National Municipal Financial Advisory Ranking - Equal to Each Financial Advisor
Source: Thomson Reuters
PFM287
FirstSouthwest 139
Public Resources Advisory
Group 64
Peralta Garcia Solutions LLC 3
Govt Development Bank for
Puerto Rico 7
KNN Public Finance 32
Raymond James 15
A C Advisory Inc 24
Acacia Financial Group Inc 43
Piper Jaffray & Co 72
12,504.3
6,343.2
4,905.4
3,819.0
3,270.6
2,374.1
2,237.2
1,840.8
1,822.6
1,539.3
dollars in millions# transactions
2011 - 2013 Florida Taxable Long Term Municipal New Issues
National Municipal Financial Advisory Ranking - Equal to Each Financial Advisor
Source: Thomson Reuters
Raymond James 3
FirstSouthwest 3
PFM8
Tibor Partners 2
RBC Capital Markets 2
Fidelity Financial Services 2
Spectrum Municipal Services
Inc 3
Ford & Associates 1
National Minority Consultant
Inc 1
Public Resources Advisory
Group 2
2,061.1
499.2
204.7
197.9
57.7
50.9
40.2
35.3
34.0
28.0
dollars in millions# transactions
PFM’s Taxable Financing Experience
City of South Miami ~ Proposal for Financial Advisory services ~ RFQ# FN2014-03 | 21
City of Des Moines, Iowa 1998 to Present
In the fall of 2012, PFM worked with the City of Des Moines on a taxable multi-
purpose issuance that had both new money and refunding elements. The City
issued General Obligation Parking Bonds, Taxable Series 2012F for the purpose
of reconstruction and improvement of City parking ramps and the refunding and
refinancing of outstanding tax-exempt parking system revenue bonds, Series 2000A. This refunding,
combined with the release of the existing debt service reserve fund, reduced the new debt service
payments by over $4.6 million, thereby taking pressure off the City’s Municipal Parking Fund which was
struggling due to the economic recession. Ultimately, alongside raising the appropriate funds for the City
parking ramp project, the competitive sale netted the City over $3 million of present value savings, or over
20% savings as a percentage of refunded par.
PFM assisted the City by preparing a cash flow model which articulated the financial performance of the
Municipal Parking System by tracking the historical and projected debt service coverage ratio, capital
expenditures and ending cash balance targets. Currently, PFM is assisting the City with the proposed
demolition and rebuild of their 7th and Grand Parking garage. PFM will use the cash flow analysis to
demonstrate credit strength to the credit agencies to target an A rating. The City expects to implement
this financing plan in the Spring/Summer of 2015.
University of South Florida Financing Corporation 2002 to Present
PFM had been retained by the University of South Florida to serve as
financial advisor on its proposed issuance of $20,000,000 of debt to
refinance a portion of the cost to renovate the USF Arena and
Convocation Center Project. PFM reviewed the financial pro-forma prepared by the University and
assisted with the development of the plan of finance and credit structure as well as review of the bank
loan proposals received by the University.
PFM helped the University with their pro-forma debt service coverage calculations, running a variety of
scenarios including the receipt of naming rights revenues, pouring rights from Coca-Cola, and other
factors. Given the uncertainty regarding the magnitude of certain revenue streams and expense
projections, PFM recommended that the University fund a debt service reserve equal to one year’s debt
service, providing additional liquidity for bondholder protection. The loan closed without incident in Fall of
2013, successfully reimbursing the University for funds that had been expended earlier on the project.
Osceola County 2005 to Present
For several years, going back to 2005, the County analyzed ways to increase the
countywide convention center capacity. Through the dedicated use of the 5th Cent TDT,
and with a goal of insulating the other TDT and General Fund revenues, the County began
looking at ways to incentivize hoteliers to expand current operations.
PFM developed a model specifically for this program to provide capacity analysis on
revenues collected and projected revenues that could potentially be used to secure bonds for the
expansion of a hotel and conference center over the next several years. The model allowed for the TDT
revenues and project revenues to be applied to each project by the pledged amount and was further
broken out by Senior and Subordinate Liens. This model was used heavily in working with the rating
agency to project the debt service coverage of the current and future issuances, which resulted in a
stronger rating being issued to the County than otherwise would have occurred.
The County successfully issued a 30-year $12.565 Million Taxable Tourist Development Tax (Fifth Cent)
Revenue Bonds on February 1, 2012. The PFM pricing group negotiated with the Underwriter to issue the
Bonds as partial par/partial discount structure, rather than the suggested structure of issuing all the Bonds
at a discount. The structuring recommendations made by PFM provided the County with additional option
value, including a 10-yr par call that offers the County an opportunity to call bonds in the future as the
credit quality of this insulated pledge increases through stronger coverage.
J. Advance and Current Refunding and
Refinancing Experience
PFM’s Advance and Current Refunding Experience
City of South Miami ~ Proposal for Financial Advisory services ~ RFQ# FN2014-03 | 23
Describe your firm’s relevant experience with advance and current refunding transactions over the last
three years. Include three case studies, if available, that illustrate the firm’s experience with relevant
transactions where the firm has served as financial advisor. Please limit your response to two pages.
PFM is a frequent participant in the municipal markets, providing experience executing numerous current
and advance refundings. Additionally, we have developed and have helped to develop numerous
innovative advance refunding techniques. With long-term interest rates still below historical averages,
PFM is currently advising and assisting many of our clients with the execution of numerous current and
advance refundings. Our high level of vigilance enables PFM to continually add value to our clients.
2011 - 2013 Refunding Long Term Municipal New Issues
National Municipal Financial Advisory Ranking - Equal to Each Financial Advisor
Source: Thomson Reuters
PFM1,360
Public Resources Advisory
Group 191
FirstSouthwest 997
Lamont Financial Services
Corp 70
Piper Jaffray & Co 321
Govt Development Bank for
Puerto Rico 22
Acacia Financial Group Inc 189
RBC Capital Markets 253
A C Advisory Inc 40
Kaufman Hall & Associates
Inc 86
77,160.7
42,955.4
36,482.3
17,721.6
10,863.8
9,949.7
9,079.8
8,464.5
8,358.9
7,721.2
dollars in millions# transactions
2011 - 2013 Florida Refunding Long Term Municipal New Issues
National Municipal Financial Advisory Ranking - Equal to Each Financial Advisor
Source: Thomson Reuters
PFM123
FirstSouthwest 21
Public Resources Advisory
Group 12
Dunlap & Associates 18
RBC Capital Markets 17
Spectrum Municipal Services
Inc 12
Kaufman Hall & Associates
Inc 9
Ford & Associates 10
Fidelity Financial Services 11
National Minority Consultant
Inc 7
9,878.1
1,932.8
1,181.1
1,126.0
965.2
928.8
800.5
606.3
597.9
417.0
dollars in millions# transactions
PFM’s Advance and Current Refunding Experience
City of South Miami ~ Proposal for Financial Advisory services ~ RFQ# FN2014-03 | 24
City of Jacksonville 2001 to Present
PFM has served the City of Jacksonville, FL as Financial Advisor for over 13
years, and assisted in the development of the City’s debt management policy
along with advising on the issuance of the City’s several types of debt. In 2012,
PFM approached the City with an idea to consolidate all General Fund Debt
issuances under the Special Revenue Lien (Covenant Pledge) through future debt issuances and more
specifically refundings. PFM led the effort to consolidate the debt structure for greater efficiency and
increased transparency. At the time, the City issued under eight different liens and bonds eligible for
refundings were spread across four separate liens. PFM managed the consolidation process and
coordinated with City, the Office of General Counsel, bond counsel, disclosure counsel and underwriting
team in order to successfully and efficiently create documents to achieve these goals, as well as
modernize and standardize the City’s issuance documents. Since 2012, the City has now issued $350
million of bonds under the new indenture, creating over $50 million of Present Value savings.
Palm Beach County, Florida 2013 to Present
PFM has served Palm Beach County, Florida as Financial Advisor since 2013. PFM first
identified a pair of Series 2006 General Obligation bonds that were eligible for an advance
refunding using our proprietary debt profile model. Upon presentation of the opportunity to
the County, the working group began to work through the process of refunding these
bonds. A similar process took place later in the year when PFM identified a number of
Public Improvement bonds that could be both advance and current refunded for savings.
Due to the County’s strong credit, household name, and relatively straight-forward issuance, PFM
recommended a competitive sale for each issuance of bonds. During these competitive sales the County
never had less than double digit bidders, with one issuance in particular having 18 bidders vying for the
bonds. Between the general obligation and public improvement refunding issuances, the County has
achieved over $10 million in net present value savings in 2014. Currently, the County is underway with
two more refunding issuances, including a Water & Sewer and Public Improvement refunding. PFM is
actively monitoring the market and running numbers to determine the viability of a refunding. In the
current market, these issuances are expected to produce another $5 million in net present value savings.
City of Riviera Beach, Florida 2013 to Present
Upon being hired on as financial advisor in 2013, PFM immediately identified an
opportunity for the City to realize significant net present value savings by refunding their
Series 2004 Water & Sewer Revenue Bonds. Given the strength of the market at the time,
PFM quickly created a request for underwriter proposals while simultaneously
coordinating the review of bond documents, cutting down on the time to get to market
where possible.
Given the City had not issued in the public sphere for a number of years, PFM provided the issuer with a
presentation describing the mechanics of how the refunding would work, which was used to enlighten the
board for approval of the issuance. PFM also led the conversation with rating agencies in order to re-
acquaint the agencies with the credit. For this same reason, PFM also recommended a negotiated sale,
as having an underwriter go through the document and rating process would allow them to be able to
better understand and ultimately sell the credit to investors.
The issue went out for pricing on the public market in the summer of 2014. As is typical on public deals
where PFM is the financial advisor, The PFM pricing group negotiated with the Underwriter on behalf of
the issuer to tighten yields on the pricing, ultimately resulting in increased savings to the issuer. When
pricing was finished, the issuer had savings of over $3 million in net present value savings, or over 13%
savings as a percentage of refunded par. Given the typical threshold for a current refunding is 3%, this
deal was a strong success, and the issuer obtained cash-flow relief for the 20-year duration of the
issuance.
K. Market and Pricing Information
PFM’s Market Expertise
City of South Miami ~ Proposal for Financial Advisory services ~ RFQ# FN2014-03 | 26
Describe your firm’s knowledge, experience and resources in tracking and monitoring the tax exempt and
taxable bond markets, including the fixed rate, variable rate, swaps and other derivative products, and the
government securities market. Include a discussion of your firm’s participation in underwriting tax-exempt
and taxable bonds, acting as a principal in swap transactions, and providing investment services. Also,
discuss your process for ensuring that the City receives the best price for any bonds, financings involving
swaps and other derivative products, and any escrow securities as part of any refunding. Include a
discussion of how you evaluate the success of any pricing.
Market Experience
PFM offers clients a unique blend of Wall Street knowledge, technical resources and an independent,
local fiduciary perspective. As indicated in the table below, PFM is the most active Financial Advisor in
the country and is a more frequent market participant than even the largest investment banking firms. In
2013, PFM assisted clients with 768 debt issues with a total par amount in excess of $46 billion.
PFM is a fully registered municipal advisor, as promulgated through recent Dodd-Frank legislation. We
are not underwriters, and as such avoid the inherent conflicts of interest that caused much of the
municipal reform seen today. Today, and for the last 35 years, we have served solely as a fiduciary to
our public sector clients.
PFM Bond Pricing Group
PFM is the only financial advisory firm in the country that has a specialty “Bond Pricing Group” that
focuses solely on assisting the firm’s client on matters related to the pricing of bond issues. This team is
based in our Charlotte office and is led by Todd Frazier, a Managing Director.
The Bond Pricing Group is involved in the pricing of
5-10 issues every week. For this reason, they have
as much experience with the pricing and sale of
municipal issues ($40-$50 billion per year) as the
largest underwriting firms.
Our financial advisory professionals begin
consulting with the Bond Pricing Group on various
matters well before the scheduled sale of a client’s
issue. Such discussions include a review of current
market conditions, how recent comparable issues
have been received in the market, and how
investors are reacting to certain structural features
(such as call provisions, coupon structure, discount and premium bonds, etc.). As the sale of the client’s
issue approaches, the Bond Pricing Group will develop their own estimate of an interest rate scale for the
No. Deals Total Par ($ Billion)
1.Public Financial Management, Inc.FA76846,071.0
2.Bank of America Merrill LynchUW38644,952.9
3.JP Morgan Securities LLCUW34338,497.9
4.CitiUW36236,736.9
5.Morgan StanleyUW23620,647.2
6.Goldman Sachs & CoUW9317,215.8
7.RBC Capital MarketsUW57117,013.1
8.Wells Fargo & CoUW21416,982.4
9.BarclaysUW12113,915.2
10.Piper Jaffray & CoUW62610,996.0
2013 Presence in the Market - Underwriters and Financial Advisors
PFM’s Market Expertise
City of South Miami ~ Proposal for Financial Advisory services ~ RFQ# FN2014-03 | 27
client’s issue and will review that with the client before beginning discussions with the underwriters for the
issue.
During the actual bond sale process, our Bond Pricing Group will be in constant contact with both the
client and other PFM team members, as well as with the underwriters for the issue. We often propose
solutions to challenges that arise during the marketing process, such as how an issue can be restructured
modestly to respond to investor demand, with the goal of reducing the yield on the issue.
In summary, no other financial advisory firm can offer the level of independent expertise during the pricing
of bond issues as PFM can. And, it is essential to note that the members of our Bond Pricing Group have
absolutely no potential conflicts of interest in serving our clients. They spend 100% of their time serving
clients from the financial advisory perspective, as PFM never serves as an underwriter.
Current Trend - Direct Bank Placements
In today’s market, smaller sized financings with shorter term lengths (15 years or less) are most often
more efficient when issued as a bank loan due to lower costs of issuance, less disclosure requirements
and shorter time frame than a conventional public issuance. In fact, some banks have recently been
willing to take on larger financings in excess of $100 million at more attractive terms than the public bond
market.
When a client informs PFM of an upcoming financing need, the project team completes an analysis as to
whether a publically offered financing or a privately placed bank loan would be more efficient. The City’s
project team would take all factors of the financing into consideration (term, size, principal structure, credit,
and market conditions) and present the City with a financing options memo summarizing what we expect
the financing numbers to look like in the current market and a discussion of the pros and cons of each
option. After we present the memo to the City, we would have an in-depth discussion and decide whether a
bank loan is the best option for the City.
PFM has extensive expertise in implementing whatever financing structure is deemed to be most cost
effective. As shown in the graphic to the right, PFM completed as many private placement bank loans as all
of our competitors combined in 2013. The following table provides a brief summary of some of the pros and
cons to consider when analyzing a bank loan financing.
2013 Full Year Florida Private Placement Long Term Municipal New Issues
National Municipal Financial Advisory Ranking - Equal to Each Financial Advisor
Source: Thomson Reuters
PFM25
Ponder & Co 2
Dunlap & Associates 4
FirstSouthwest 1
BLX Group LLC 1
Ford & Associates 1
Wye River Group
Incorporated 1
Kaufman Hall & Associates
Inc 1
Spectrum Municipal Services
Inc 1
RBC Capital Markets 1
1,046.2
63.1
55.5
41.4
35.0
25.3
19.0
15.2
10.7
10.4
dollars in millions# transactions
Pros Cons
• Does not require transaction be
rated or insured
• No offering documents or
registration required
• Banks usually do not require a
Debt Service Reserve Fund
• Disclosure usually limited to
receipt of CAFR and budget (no
official statement)
• Minimal cost of issuance
• The purchase of tax-exempt
loans by non-bank subsidiaries
and affiliates of commercial
banks debt has resulted in more
efficient “nonbank qualified”
pricing (Leasing Corporation)
• Most banks prefer financings with a term of 10
years or less, some will allow terms up to 15-20
years
• Interest rate subject to increase if tax laws
change or loan is deemed taxable in the future
• Risk of future tax law changes retained by the
issuer. Bank loans usually contain interest rate
“gross up” language; providing the bank the right
to increase the loan rate should tax law changes
negatively impact the bank’s after tax yield
• Term limited to 20 years and some banks will not
provide a fixed rate for the entire term. Instead,
the bank would have a “put” option during the
term of the loan (5, 10, or 15 years). This allows
the bank the option to “put” the loan back to the
issuer and force them to refinance at current
market rates.
PFM’s Market Expertise
City of South Miami ~ Proposal for Financial Advisory services ~ RFQ# FN2014-03 | 28
PFM Swap Advisory Services
PFM’s Swap Advisory practice (PFMSA, LLC.), consisting of a dedicated team of 4 professionals, equals
the size of the largest standalone derivatives advisory boutiques. As part of a full-service financial
advisory firm, however, we understand that a client’s primary objective is developing the optimal financial
structure (unlike some derivatives boutiques where the recommended “solution” frequently, and not
surprisingly, involves a swap). Our swap personnel will closely coordinate their efforts with City’s awarded
financial advisor to ensure seamless execution of any derivative-linked financing transactions. PFMSA
believes that as a multi-faceted financial advisory firm, it brings major advantages to the City that cannot
be attained from other swap advisory firms.
One aspect that differentiates PFMSA’s team is its Wall Street connection – three of our professionals
have direct experience working on a swap trading desk in either a pricing, structuring or technology role.
This hands-on experience structuring and trading derivatives distinguishes them from many of those in
the industry purporting to be swap specialists, but who in reality are often simply “retro-fitted” GIC brokers.
PFMSA prides itself on our ability to provide seamless trade execution for clients. In the case of
competitively bid swaps, we believe that the experience and reputation of an issuer, and its swap advisor,
for executing efficient auctions improves the economics of bids because the issuer will not be charged a
trade execution or market risk penalty. For negotiated transactions, PFMSA’s industry leading position
and reputation for integrity makes our fair-market opinions the industry gold standard.
Experience
Swap advisory is not a new practice area for PFMSA. PFMSA has over fifteen years of experience in
developing hedging policies and conducting transactions of this nature, including structuring and
procuring various forms of interest rate swaps or advising on bonds with embedded features such as
options. During this time we have identified and addressed virtually every issue and concern facing not-
for-profit and tax-exempt borrowers.
We believe that PFMSA is especially well qualified to work
with the City based on our broad experience advising on
derivatives transactions for non-profit borrowers. Given the
complexity, compensation, and real risks embedded in swap
transactions it is important to select a swap advisor who not
only has recognized credibility in the market but also a firm
that does not treat derivatives as an adjunct to an existing
consulting practice. PFMSA is a recognized leader in the
industry in managing both competitive and negotiated swap
transactions. The table to the right summarizes the number
and notional principal amount of interest rate swap and
derivative transactions for which PFMSA served as swap
advisor in the last 10 years.
Asset Management
PFM Asset Management LLC (“PFMAM”) is devoted primarily to providing investment advice and portfolio
management for governmental and not-for-profit organizations, corporations, pension funds and other
institutions. As an investment manager, PFMAM brings a comprehensive spectrum of services to the
business of money management. Managing both investment pools and individual client portfolios
designed to earn competitive yields - while maximizing safety and liquidity, PFMAM’s services include
timely market-driven portfolio management, portfolio design, state-of-the-art accounting and arbitrage
rebate calculation services. The value of this service to clients is evident in the growth of assets under
our management, from $1 billion in 1986 to over $50 billion as of December 31, 2013. PFM Asset
Management LLC is registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
Year Number of
Transactions Notional Amount
200413810,253,049,750
200515012,964,705,241
200615511,546,311,023
200715310,847,225,139
200825013,671,408,232
20091569,026,705,299
20101216,299,364,457
2011895,114,339,405
2012714,348,009,717
2013994,784,721,689
2014Q1191,380,132,756
Total1,40190,235,972,708
PFM’s Market Expertise
City of South Miami ~ Proposal for Financial Advisory services ~ RFQ# FN2014-03 | 29
Investment Consulting
PFM Advisors is a specialized component division of PFM Asset Management LLC providing investment
and retirement plan consulting services to pension funds, endowments and similar funds. We believe that
a true partnership with our clients can only be achieved by fully understanding the unique characteristics
of their funds. Therefore, our ability to structure simple, reliable, and fundamentally sound asset and
retirement planning management strategies results in predictable investment returns, sound vendor
services and few surprises. PFM Advisors’ clients include public funds, Taft-Hartley funds, corporate
funds, hospitals, foundations and endowment funds.
Structured Products
The Structured Products Group of PFMAM is a group of professionals dedicated to advising clients on the
use of cutting edge structured financial products. We assist municipal clients in structuring and
procurement of interest rate swaps, caps and collars to help reduce financing costs. On the asset side,
the Structured Products Group assists clients in structuring and procurement of forward delivery
agreements, guaranteed investment contracts, flexible repurchase agreements and asset swaps. The
Group is also responsible for structuring and restructuring advance refunding escrow portfolios for
PFMAM clients.
Arbitrage Rebate Services
The rules that govern the arbitrage rebate process are highly complex. That is why The PFM Group
maintains a dedicated internal Arbitrage Rebate Group to help our clients navigate through and comply
with these complex federal tax law requirements. This dedicated group offers a comprehensive suite of
services and value-added approach at a reasonable cost. The Arbitrage Rebate Group has developed
sophisticated calculation models that are designed to achieve compliance and explore and implement
liability reduction strategies to attain optimal results. Every year, hundreds of bond issuers seek advice
from The PFM Group for the following reasons:
An established track record. The Arbitrage Rebate Group’s professionals have provided arbitrage
rebate services since 1989. We maintain the resources and talent that are required to prepare over
3,500 calculations annually for our clients. Each calculation is subject to a quality check in order to
verify the accuracy of the data. Client by client, we have built a solid reputation for preparing thorough
and thoughtful analyses, with the goal of identifying the best after-tax result.
Value-adding focus. The Arbitrage Rebate Group understands that ongoing compliance with federal
tax laws is an integral part of every tax-exempt financing program and believes that the ideal
compliance approach goes beyond simply achieving compliance. We believe an effective compliance
approach can minimize costs by reducing liabilities to the fullest extent possible, and by reducing both
the financial and resource-driven burdens associated with managing audits or information requests
initiated by the IRS.
IRS Audit Experience. The Arbitrage Rebate Group has assisted several issuers with preparing
responses to IRS audits, information document requests, and other regulatory proceedings and we
are referred to issuers by bond and tax counsel in the event of an IRS audit. We have had good
success in defending its own work. Our thorough reporting provides the detail that is needed to fully
address IRS audit questions. In addition, The PFM Group maintains, on our network, the records
provided to us to prepare arbitrage rebate calculations, which enables us to quickly provide this
information to our clients.
Post-Issuance Compliance Services
At the end of 2011, the IRS revised its 8038 Form Series to ask issuers to answer questions about the
existence of written policies and procedures governing arbitrage rebate and use of financed facilities
compliance. Ever mindful of the need to “check the box” yes, their counsel drafted several pages labeled
“Policies and Procedures”. The problem is: there isn’t much in the way of procedures in the documents,
and no processes or systems to support the objectives stated therein. When this process started, the IRS
PFM’s Market Expertise
City of South Miami ~ Proposal for Financial Advisory services ~ RFQ# FN2014-03 | 30
rejected the Arbitrage Certificate as insufficient a document for post issuance compliance purposes. Many
issuers do not even remember that these Policies and Procedures, tacked on as an appendix to their
Arbitrage Certificate in their bond transcript, even exist. This failure to provide a system for compliance
supported by issuer embedded processes and internal controls sets the stage for likely failures, either
now or in the future. While the area of IRS focus has been tax compliance, this review can easily include
the continuing disclosure responsibilities as well. In fact, earlier this year the SEC’s Division of
Enforcement published a notice titled “Municipalities Continuing Disclosure Cooperation Initiative”
(commonly referred to as “MCDC” or the “Disclosure Initiative”).
Key Questions for the City to ask:
Do you have written policies and procedures in place for post-issuance compliance?
If yes, what systems for compliance are in place, and how do the written policies and procedures
integrate with their internal processes and controls?
Is there an annual checklist to assure and document compliance?
PFM has a Managing Director and staff dedicated to this topic, and we are able to provide a full range of
Post-Issuance Compliance Services. Our typical process is to conduct an assessment phase, where we
interview various people that touch upon the issuance, investment and use of bond proceeds or the use
of debt financed property. Our inquiry includes a discussion of the processes in place, the forms used,
and internal controls. The outcome of this exercise is an oral exit conference or conference call to
discuss the good, the bad and the ugly, with suggested changes. Any changes being implemented are
then included as baseline processes for the next phase including the development of a written policies
and procedures document - who does what, when and how. We then provide a corresponding annual
checklist, to assist in the ongoing assurance that the system in place is routinely applied year after year.
L. Disciplinary Actions
PFM’s Litigation Statement
City of South Miami ~ Proposal for Financial Advisory services ~ RFQ# FN2014-03 | 32
Describe any litigation or regulatory action (other than those noted in response to items requested in
section VI) filed against your firm in the last five (5) years, and the resolution thereof. Provide a statement
of positive assurance that your firm and its representatives are not presently being investigated or in
violation of any statutes or regulatory rules, including those of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (other than those noted above), National Association of Securities
Dealers, Florida Department of Banking, etc., or attach a statement describing the current status of such
investigations or violations. Describe how your firm ensures compliance with all regulatory requirements.
Public Financial Management and an affiliate (collectively “PFM”) were joined as “4th party defendants” in
a lawsuit initiated by a school district against its swap counterparty for declarative relief that the swap is
unenforceable. The swap counterparty joined the school district’s bond counsel as a defendant, and bond
counsel then joined PFM, claiming that if counsel were to be liable for any damages it would be entitled to
contribution from PFM. This suit was settled in early 2013; PFM contributed less than 1% of the amounts
agreed in settlement.
Neither Public Financial Management (“PFM”) nor any of its personnel (representatives) is presently
being investigated or in violation of any statute or regulatory rule.
As required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”), PFM
has registered as a municipal advisor under regulations issued by the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) and the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB). Other governance
regulations pursuant to Dodd-Frank have been drafted by the SEC and the MSRB and presented for
comment, but none are in final form or are effective (excepting a few general MSRB rules). PFM’s Legal
and Compliance Departments are diligently reviewing proposed regulatory requirements, and PFM is
positioning itself to comply with such regulatory requirements when they are finalized. General policies
and procedures to detect employee misconduct, including insider trading and violations of our political
contributions policy, are included in our Employee Handbook. The Legal and Compliance Departments of
PFM are responsible for monitoring compliance with all such requirements.
Appendix I. Proposal Submittal Checklist Form
Thomas F. Pepe
10-13-14
Proposal Submittal Checklist Form
This checklist indicates the forms and documents required to be submitted for this solicitation and to be presented
by the deadline set for within the solicitation. Fulfillment of all solicitation requirements listed is mandatory for
consideration of response to the solicitation. Additional documents may be required and, if so, they will be
identified in an addendum to this RFQ. The response shall include the following items:
Attachments and Other Documents to be Completed: Check
Completed.
X Respondents Qualification Statement
X Non-Collusion Affidavit
X Public Entity Crimes and Conflicts of Interest
X Drug Free Workplace
X Acknowledgement of Conformance with OSHA Standards
X List of Proposed Subcontractors and Principal Suppliers
X Related Party Transaction Verification Form
X Indemnification and Insurance Documents
X Signed Contract Documents (All – including General Conditions
and Supplementary Conditions)
Submit this checklist along with your proposal indicating the completion and submission of each
required forms and/or documents.
END OF SECTION
13
Thomas F. Pepe
10-13-14
RESPONDENT QUALIFICATION STATEMENT
The response to this questionnaire shall be utilized as part of the CITY’S overall Proposal Evaluation and
RESPONDENT selection.
1.Number of similar Finance Advising engagements completed,
a) In the past 5 years
b) In the past 10 years
2.List the last three (3) completed Financing Advising engagements.
a) Financing Engagement:
Entity Name:
Entity Address:
Entity Telephone:
Financing Amount:
b) Financing Engagement:
Entity Name:
Entity Address:
Entity Telephone:
Financing Amount:
14
4,365
8,317
FinancialAdvisoryServices
Series2014DCertificatesofParticipation
SchoolBoardofMiami-DadeCounty
1450NE2ndAvenue,Miami,FL33132
LeoFernandez,Treasurer
305-995-1633
$276,995,000
FinancialAdvisoryServices
Series2014RevenueBonds
SoutheastOvertownParkwestCRA
(CityofMiami)
1490NW3rdAve,Miami,FL33136
ClarenceWoods,ExecutiveDirector
305-679-6802
$55,885,000
Thomas F. Pepe
10-13-14
c) Financing Engagement:
Entity Name:
Entity Address:
Entity Telephone:
Financing Amount:
END OF SECTION
15
FinancialAdvisoryServices
Series2014RefundingBonds
CityofMiami,Florida
444SW2ndAve,Miami,FL33130
FernandoCasamayor,CFO/AsstCityManager
305-416-1009
$18,049,379.90
Thomas F. Pepe
10-13-14
3.Current Finance Advising workload:
Financing
Engagement
Entity Telephone Number Financing Amounts
4.The following information shall be attached to the proposal.
a) RESPONDENT’s Organizational Chart.
b) RESPONDENT’s proposed Financial Advising Team Chart for the City’s Engagement
c) Resumes of proposed key engagement team personnel.
5.List and describe any:
a) Bankruptcy petitions filed by or against the Respondent or any predecessor organizations,
b) Any arbitration or civil or criminal proceedings, or
c) Suspension of contracts or debarring from Bidding or Responding by any public agency brought
against the Respondent in the last five (5) years
16
FinancialAdvisory
2015GOBonds
Miami-DadeCounty,
FL
CharlesParkinson,
305-375-5873
$372,155,000
Anticipatedclose01/15
FinancialAdvisory
2015SpecialObBonds
CityofMiami,FL FernandoCasamayor
305-416-1009
$12,000,000
Anticipatedclose01/15
FinancialAdvisory
2015GOBonds
CityofCoral
Springs,FL
MelissaHeller
954-344-1087
$12,450,000
Anticipatedclose01/15
FinancialAdvisory
2015RefundingCOPs
SchoolBoardof
Miami-DadeCounty,FL
LeoFernandez
305-995-1633
$312,000,000
Anticipatedclose02/15
Responsebelow
Response below
Response below
PFM'sResponse
a)None
b)PublicFinancialManagementandanaffiliate(collectively“PFM”)werejoinedas“4thpartydefendants”
inalawsuitinitiatedbyaschooldistrictagainstitsswapcounterpartyfordeclarativereliefthatthe
swapisunenforceable.Theswapcounterpartyjoinedtheschooldistrict’sbondcounselasadefendant,and
bondcounselthenjoinedPFM,claimingthatifcounselweretobeliableforanydamagesitwouldbe
entitledtocontributionfromPFM.Thissuitwassettledinearly2013;PFMcontributedlessthan1%ofthe
amountsagreedinsettlement.NeitherPublicFinancialManagement(“PFM”)noranyofitspersonnel
(representatives)ispresentlybeinginvestigatedorinviolationofanystatuteorregulatoryrule.
c)PublicFinancialManagement(PFM)maintainsanationwidefinancialadvisorypracticeservicinghundreds
of differentclientsatanyonetime.Ourclientbasehasincreasedregularlyovertheyears,asaresult,
webelieve,ofclientsatisfaction.In2013PFMprovidedfinancialadvisoryservicestoanaggregateof
1,400clients.AllofPFM’sclientservicecontractsareterminableinthediscretionoftheclienton
shortnotice.PFMdoesnotmaintainrecordsthatareindexedtoidentifywhyaclientengagementhas
becomeinactive,ifweinfacthavebeeninformedbytheclient,and,consequentlyPFMisnotina
positiontoprovideafactualresponsetothisquestion.
attached
attached
attached
Thomas F. Pepe
10-13-14
6.Government References:
List other Government Agencies or Quasi-government Agencies for which you have been engaged in
Financial Advising Services within the past five (5) years.
END OF SECTION
Name of Agency:
Address:
Telephone No.:
Contact Person:
Financing Engagement:
Name of Agency:
Address:
Telephone No.:
Contact Person:
Financing Engagement:
Name of Agency:
Address:
Telephone No.:
Contact Person:
Financing Engagement:
17
Miami-DadeCounty,FL(since2001)
111NW1stStreet,Miami,FL33128
305-375-5873
CharlesParkinson,SeniorBondAnalyst
FinancialAdvisory,TransactionandLong-termplanning
CityofMiami,FL(since2011)
444SW2ndAvenue,Miami,FL33130
305-416-1009
FernandoCasamayor,CFO/AsstCityManager
Financial,Investment.P3Advisory,CreditAdvisory,Planning
CityofCoralSprings,FL
9551WestSampleRd,CoralSprings,FL33065
954-344-1087
MelissaHeller,FinanceDirector
FinancialAdvisory,CreditAdvisory,BudgetaryPlanning
EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK
EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK
AUGUST 2011 11
Drug Free Workplace and Testing
Policy Statement
PFM is committed to providing its employees and clients with a safe, productive
environment free of alcohol and substance abuse. Employees are expected to report to work in a fit
condition and conform to the provisions of this policy. Drug or alcohol use may affect job
performance or efficiency, threaten safety, result in misconduct or reflect adversely on PFM's
reputation. The unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession, sale, or use of a
controlled substance in the workplace or while engaged in PFM business off PFM's premises is
strictly prohibited. Such conduct is also prohibited during non-working time to the extent that in
the opinion of PFM, it impairs an employee's ability to perform on the job or threatens the
reputation or integrity of PFM.
Introduction
Employees are expected to report to work and remain at work in condition to perform
assigned duties free from the effects of alcohol and drugs.
1. Alcohol abuse or illegal drug use and its effects represent a threat to the well being and
security of employees and could cause extensive damage to PFM’s property, reputation and
community standing.
2. Any involvement with alcohol and/or drugs that adversely affects the work place or the
work environment will not be tolerated.
3. Off the job illegal drug activity or alcohol abuse that could have an adverse effect on an
employee’s job performance or that could jeopardize the safety of other employees, the public, PFM
assets, or PFM’s relations with the public will not be tolerated. Illegal drugs are those drugs defined
as illegal under federal, state or local laws.
Drug Testing Program
To meet the objectives of this policy, PFM will maintain a drug testing program that includes
the following:
PFM will also conduct “for cause” testing. When a supervisor observes behavior or
performance problems that could adversely affect an individual’s safety or the safety
of others, the supervisor will notify the Human Resources or designee to determine
whether a drug test “for cause” should be conducted. If a drug test for cause
becomes necessary for an employee, the employee will immediately be suspended
with pay until a full evaluation has taken place and an appropriate course of action is
determined. No prior notice is required to test for cause. In addition, an employee
who refuses to submit to a “for cause” drug screen will be subject to immediate
termination of employment.
EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK
AUGUST 2011 12
PFM may require a “post-accident” drug test following an on-the-job accident or
incident that results in injuries to the employee or others or damage to property.
Employees may be suspended with pay until a full evaluation has been completed.
Any employee who refuses to submit to a “post-accident” drug screen will be subject
to immediate termination of employment.
Searches
Entering PFM’s property constitutes consent to searches and inspections. If an individual is
suspected of violating the drug-free workplace policy, he or she may be asked to submit to a search
or inspection of all personal property located on PFM’s property at any time. For instance, searches
can be conducted of pockets and clothing, wallets, purses, briefcases and other bags, and desks and
work stations. It is a violation of this policy to refuse to submit to a search and may be cause for
termination.
Prescription Medications
Prescription and over-the-counter drugs are not prohibited when taken in standard dosage
and/or according to a physician's prescription. Any worker taking prescribed or over-the-counter
medications will be responsible for consulting the prescribing physician and/or pharmacist to
ascertain whether the medication may interfere with safe performance of his/her job. If the use of a
medication could compromise the safety of the worker, fellow workers or the public, it is the
worker's responsibility to contact Human Resources or designee and to use appropriate leave so as
not to report to work. The illegal or unauthorized use of prescription drugs is prohibited. It is a
violation of our drug-free workplace policy to intentionally misuse and/or abuse prescription
medications.
Employee Assistance Program
PFM provides an Employee Assistance Program (Life Balance) to aid employees in dealing
with substance abuse. Employees who are abusers are encouraged to take advantage of the
program, before a disciplinary issue arises, with participation being highly confidential between
employees and the Life Balance counselors. PFM will cooperate with employees who seek
appropriate treatment for substance abuse problems and bring their work performance to acceptable
levels.
At its discretion, PFM may require employees who violate this policy by testing positive for
the presence of illegal drugs for the first time to successfully complete a drug abuse assistance or
rehabilitation program as a condition of continued employment. Any subsequent positive test for
the presence of illegal drugs will result in the termination of employment.
EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK
Consequences of Violating Policy
Any PFM employee who possesses, manufactures, sells, distributes, dispenses or purchases
illegal drugs at work, while on PFM business or at a PFM-sponsored function, is not eligible for
referral to EAP or other rehabilitation program and will be subject to immediate termination.
If an employee is convicted of a drug offense occurring in the workplace, while on PFM
business or at a PFM-sponsored function, he or she must notify the Human Resources Department
within five days.
Page 1 of 1
ADDENDUM No. #1
Project Name: Financial Advisory Services
RFQ NO. FN #2014-03
Date: December 11, 2014
Sent: Fax/E-mail/webpage
This addendum submission is issued to clarify, supplement and/or modify the previously issued
Solicitation, and is hereby made part of the Documents. All requirements of the Documents not
modified herein shall remain in full force and effect as originally set forth. It shall be the sole
responsibility of the bidder to secure Addendums that may be issued for a specific solicitation.
Question #1:
On the Proposal Submittal Checklist Form on page 13 of the RFQ. I have a question regarding
the last item checked “Signed Contract Documents (All – including General Conditions and
Supplementary Conditions).” With this item being checked, does this mean our firm would
have to sign the “Contract for Financial Advisory Services” starting on page 32 of the RFQ?
Answer to Question #1:
Yes, the contract document included with the RFQ must be signed but only the contract
documents that are described and checked will be part of the contract, such as the solicitation
documents, response to the RFQ and Scope of Work.
Question #2:
If so, can we redline, if we have any changes?
Answer to Question #2:
Respondents may redline changes to the contract however, the City may not accept those
changes and may, when evaluating other respondents proposals, reject the proposal from further
consideration.
IT SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE BIDDER TO SECURE
ADDENDUMS THAT MAY BE ISSUED FOR A SPECIFIC SOLICITATION.
Page 1 of 2
ADDENDUM No. #2
Project Name: Financial Advisory Services
RFQ NO. FN #2014-03
Date: December 12, 2014
Sent: Fax/E-mail/webpage
This addendum submission is issued to clarify, supplement and/or modify the previously issued
Solicitation, and is hereby made part of the Documents. All requirements of the Documents not
modified herein shall remain in full force and effect as originally set forth. It shall be the sole
responsibility of the bidder to secure Addendums that may be issued for a specific solicitation.
Question #1:
On page 11, Section H. “Tax-Exempt New Money Product Experience,” what is specifically
meant by “special facility obligation?”
Answer to Question #1:
"Special Facility Obligations" shall mean bonds or other debt instruments issued pursuant to an
indenture or other resolution to finance Special Facilities and which are not secured by, nor
payable, from a lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues; but, which are secured by revenues
derived from Special Facilities.
Question #2:
On page 6, #17, a), it indicates that respondents shall deliver, as part of its proposal, the
Invitation for Proposal and Instructions to Respondents. Would you please clarify what
documents these refer to?
Answer to Question #2:
Page 6, #17 is referring to the “Request for Qualifications” (RFQ), and the “Instructions to
Respondents.” The “Instructions to Respondents” are a part of the RFQ,
Question #3:
Page 6, #17, b), Does this mean we need to submit copies of all addenda posted to the website?
Page 2 of 2
Answer to Question #3:
Yes, respondents submittal must include, copies of all addenda posted on the City’s website,
Bids and RFP’s Section.
Question #4:
One page 7, #19, Liability, Licenses & Permits. Would you please advise as to what is required
for investment banking firms under the City of South Miami Code?
Answer to Question #4:
Please visit https://www.municode.com/library/fl/south_miami/codes/code_of_ordinances to
obtain a copy of the City’s code of Ordinance.
IT SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE BIDDER TO SECURE
ADDENDUMS THAT MAY BE ISSUED FOR A SPECIFIC SOLICITATION.
Respondent Qualification Statement – Firm Organizational Chart
The PFM Group (“PFM”), including Public Financial Management, Inc. and PFM Asset Management LLC,
was founded in 1975 with a staff of five. Today, PFM is the nation’s leading provider of independent
financial and investment advisory services to the public sector with a staff of more than 500 professionals
located in 37 offices across the country. Financial Advisory services for the County would be provided by
the Public Financial Management, Inc. subsidiary of The PFM Group.
Respondent Qualification Statement – Team Organizational Chart
Scott Stitcher
Sr. Managing
Consultant
Orlando
Project Support
Marissa Wortman, Sr. Managing
Consultant
Structured Products
Asset
Management/
Escrow
Structuring
Pricing Group
Engagement Manager
Sergio Masvidal, Managing Director
Day‐to‐Day Contact
Analytical and Technical Support
Pedro Varona, Analyst
Jeff Pearsall
Managing Director
Philadelphia
Todd Fraizer
Managing Director
Charlotte
Management Support
David M. Moore, Managing Director
Jay Glover, Managing Director
Respondent Qualification Statement – Personnel Resumes
Sergio Masvidal is a Managing Director in the Miami office and he
has assumed an active role in providing technical financial advisory
support to clients throughout Florida and the Southeast, with a
primary focus in South Florida. Mr. Masvidal has been one of the
most active financial advisors in Florida in terms of both total par
amount and number of transactions completed.
Having actively managed over $5 billion of bond transactions, Mr. Masvidal’s clients include a variety of
Cities, Counties, Special Taxing Districts, Transportation Authorities and Utilities. Some of these clients
include Miami-Dade County, where he assists the County with their multi-billion dollar General Obligation
Bond Program and their various general credits and special tax liens. In serving the County, Mr. Masvidal
serves as the project manager for new money, refunding, tax-exempt, and taxable financings. A few of
the projects Mr. Masvidal managed include: a $345 million refunding issue for the Water and Sewer
Department that resulted in approximately $25 million of Net Present Value savings, or $1.8 million
annually for the Department; a $320 million new money bond issue comprised of five separate series that
included tax-exempt/taxable and new money/refunding bonds; three simultaneous debt restructurings
during the height of the recent financial crisis that converted the County’s outstanding auction rate bonds
within a period of one month.
In his role as project manager, Mr. Masvidal devotes a significant amount of time working with cities in
South Florida as well as new and/or infrequent issuers to develop long-term capital financing strategies.
Part of this process includes a comprehensive evaluation of available security pledges, budgetary
constraints, and development of credit ratings. Recent examples of pertinent work with cities include Mr.
Masvidal’s management of a competitive loan negotiation for the City of West Palm Beach, in which the
City was able to work around a significant pre-payment penalty while restructuring the loan and achieving
a lower interest cost. Other examples include working with the City of Pompano Beach in order to
implement a first-time financing for their CRA while protecting the City’s general fund from project risk.
That financing included three loan components made up of tax-exempt and taxable bonds, including a
latent option (City option) to later issue tax-exempt or taxable bonds, depending on the final agreement
with the private developer.
Mr. Masvidal also assists other municipalities and special taxing entities with long-term capital planning
and debt structuring/execution. Other Florida clients to whom Mr. Masvidal provides financial advisory
services include the City of Coral Gables, City of West Palm Beach, City of Doral, City of Pompano
Beach, Collier County CRA, Pompano Beach CRA, the Miami-Dade County School District, South Florida
Water Management District, Collier County, Monroe County, among others. As a member of PFM’s
financial advisory group, Mr. Masvidal has responsibility for providing analytical and technical support to
his clients. These responsibilities include managing all aspects of bond transactions, including sizing
bond transactions, developing CIP spreadsheet models, and performing refunding analyses. Mr.
Masvidal is also a member of PFM’s internal team specializing in public-private partnership agreement
structuring.
Mr. Masvidal graduated from Muhlenberg College in May of 2002, where he earned his Bachelor of Arts
in Psychology.
Sergio Masvidal
Managing Director
Florida Municipal Finance
Engagement Manager
Respondent Qualification Statement – Personnel Resumes
James Glover is a Managing Director in PFM’s Orlando office. Mr.
Glover has assumed an active role in providing project management
services to clients throughout Florida and the Southeast. Over the
last fourteen years, Mr. Glover has been one of the most active
financial advisors in Florida in terms of both total par amount and
number of transactions completed. He has taken an active role in
working with clients on new money issuances, refundings, pooled
financings, derivative products analyses, and innovative financing solutions.
The clients that Mr. Glover serves are primarily located in Florida and include cities, counties, school
districts and a variety of authorities. Mr. Glover’s project finance experience includes water and sewer,
economic development, transportation, education, public power, solid waste, and special assessment
programs. Local governments that Mr. Glover currently serves as project manager on are the cities of
St. Petersburg, Gainesville, Boca Raton, Boynton Beach, Melbourne, Ormond Beach, Delray Beach,
Coral Gables, Winter Park and the Counties of Sarasota, Orange, Brevard, Volusia, Marion, Flagler, St.
Johns, St. Lucie and the School Districts of Sarasota County, Palm Beach County and Broward County,
the First Florida Governmental Financing Commission, and the Sunshine State Governmental Financing
Commission. In addition, Mr. Glover has lead PFM’s efforts in the evolving field of Property Assessed
Clean Energy (PACE) financing and has been engaged as financial advisor to the Florida PACE Funding
Agency, a statewide PACE program.
As a Managing Director, Mr. Glover is responsible for serving as project manager on financial advisory
engagements and managing the entire financing process. He has unmatched expertise in conducting
competitive bond sales and negotiating pricings for both tax-exempt and taxable new money and
refunding bond issues. In addition, Mr. Glover has implemented more direct placement bank financings
than anyone in the State of Florida over the last 5 years. Since joining PFM in 2000, Mr. Glover has
provided served as project manager on over 200 transactions with a total par amount of over $10 billion.
In addition, Mr. Glover has worked with issuers to help improve their bond credit ratings. He has worked
with the City of Boca Raton to help improve the City’s water and sewer system ratings to AAA/Aaa/AAA,
making them the highest rated system in the country.
Mr. Glover received a B.S. in Business Administration from the College of Charleston and a M.B.A. from
the University of South Carolina.
James Glover
Managing Director
Florida Municipal Finance
Management Support
Respondent Qualification Statement – Personnel Resumes
David Moore is a Managing Director in the Orlando office. Mr.
Moore coordinates PFM’s Florida practice and is among the most
active financial advisors in Florida completing in excess of 250
financings totaling over $15 billion. During his twenty-six year
professional career, Mr. Moore has worked as an engineer,
investment banker and financial advisor focusing on public finance
for the past twenty-two years, joining PFM in 1998. As a result, he
developed special expertise in financial engineering for the unique needs of Florida cities, counties and
school districts. As the Regional Manager, Mr. Moore offers (i) years of hands on technical expertise, (ii)
understanding of local issues the Board faces and (iii) the ability to guide the Board strategically.
Mr. Moore is a hands-on, analytical project manager. This approach evolved out of his roots as an
analyst in public finance. This technical foundation is a unique asset when advising clients regarding
strategic issues with complex financing needs. An example of Mr. Moore’s technical accomplishments is
that his work for the School Board of Palm Beach County resulted in the District receiving the Bond
Buyer’s Southeast Region Deal of the Year award for a multi-series plan of finance which included almost
$1 billion in financings incorporating fixed and variable rate obligations. Another of the firm’s clients—the
South Florida Water Management District—was nominated and won the Deal of the Year for the entire
nation. For the District he helped create the first COP financing program for environmental restoration.
Even though COPs are generally viewed as a weak credit structure, Mr. Moore helped the District create
a credit presentation that outlined the unique characteristics of the District and the program. This effort
led to the District being rated AAA (implied GO) and the COPs being rated AA+. Mr. Moore has applied
his expertise for City and County clients on projects including: economic development, airports, housing,
convention centers, pooled financings, solid waste, special assessment programs and utility financings.
Mr. Moore holds a M.B.A., cum laude, from the Crummer School of Business at Rollins College and a
B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Auburn University.
David Moore
Managing Director
Southern Practice
Management Support
Respondent Qualification Statement – Personnel Resumes
Marissa Wortman joined PFM’s Orlando office as a Senior
Managing Consultant in September 2005 and now works out of the
Miami office. As a Senior Managing Consultant, Ms. Wortman is
responsible for providing project management services and
analytical support to the financial advisory group which includes:
sizing bond transactions, performing refunding analyses, reviewing
legal documents, preparing and maintaining disclosure
documentation, overseeing the rating process, preparing terms and conditions of sales, creating models
for quantitative analysis and analyzing market conditions. She has executed both negotiated and
competitive bond transactions, structured both tax-exempt and taxable new money and refunding
financings for her clients.
Prior to joining PFM, Ms. Wortman worked at Stifel, Nicolaus and Company, Incorporated, Hanifen Imhofff
Division where she served as support banker in numerous underwriting and financial advisory financings,
investment programs, and competitively bid bond issues.
Ms. Wortman has worked with Florida clients such as: Counties of Orange, Seminole, Bay, Volusia and
Escambia, Cities of Jacksonville, Miami, New Port Richey, Panama City, Oviedo, and Apopka, School
District of Martin County, Clay County Utility Authority, Jacksonville Port Authority, Rollins College,
Ringling College of Art and Design, and Stetson University. She has participated in the completion of
short-term and long-term financings exceeding $6 billion in par issuance.
Ms. Wortman received her Bachelor of Science in Business Administration degree from the University of
Central Florida in December 1997, graduating at the top of her class with Summa Cum Laude honors.
Pete Varona joined PFM in 2012 and is staffed in the Orlando
office. Pete works in the general financial advisory sector,
providing technical and quantitative support for various clients. His
present duties include structuring, sizing, and pricing new money
and refunding municipal bond issues. He is also involved in
assessing municipal issuer's outstanding debt and performing
analysis of refunding opportunities.
Mr. Varona graduated from the University of Florida with a Master of Arts degree in International
Business, as well as a Bachelor of Science in Economics.
Pedro Varona
Analyst
Technical & Analytical Support
Marissa Wortman
Senior Managing Consultant
Florida Municipal Finance
Senior Project Support
PFM’s Insurance Statement
Public Financial Management, Inc. (“PFM”) is pleased to conform to the insurance requirements as
outlined in the RFP. However, due to constraints imposed by the underlying insurer, our policies cannot
be endorsed to guarantee notification if coverage is reduced or materially changed.
Therefore, PFM asserts the following and will be bound by submission of our proposal to the City of
South Miami.
“PFM will not materially alter any of the insurance policies currently in force and relied on in this proposal.
Further, PFM will not reduce any coverage amount below the limits specified in the RFP”.
PFM has a complete insurance program, including property, casualty, comprehensive general liability,
automobile liability and workers compensation. PFM maintains professional liability and fidelity bond
coverages which total $15 million and $10 million, respectively. PFM also carries a $2 million cyber
liability policy.
Deductibles/SIR:
Automobile $250 comprehensive & $500 collision
Cyber Liability $50,000
General Liability $0
Professional Liability (E&O) $1,000,000
Financial Institution Bond $75,000
Insurance Company & AM Best Rating
Professional Liability (E&O) ............................................................Indian Harbor Insurance Company; and
Continental Casualty Company; (both are A)
Financial Institution Bond ..................................................................Federal Insurance Company; (A++)
Cyber Liability……………………………………………………………. Indian Harbor Insurance Company (A)
General Liability............................................................................... Great Northern Ins. Company; (A++)
Automobile Liability ......................................................................................Federal Insurance Company
Excess /Umbrella Liability ............................................................................Federal Insurance Company
Workers Compensation & Employers Liability .......................................Pacific Indemnity Company; (A++)
Appendix II. PFM’s Pricing Group
Pr
i
c
i
n
g
G
r
o
u
p
W
e
e
k
l
y
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
I.
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
D
a
t
a
P
a
g
e
s
2
-
4
II
.
Hi
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
S
u
p
p
l
y
a
n
d
D
e
m
a
n
d
P
a
g
e
5
II
I
.
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
V
i
s
i
b
l
e
S
u
p
p
l
y
P
a
g
e
6
IV
.
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
B
o
n
d
F
l
o
w
s
P
a
g
e
7
V.
Bi
d
s
W
a
n
t
e
d
a
n
d
P
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
R
a
t
i
o
P
a
g
e
8
VI
.
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
R
a
t
i
o
s
a
n
d
S
h
o
r
t
-
T
e
r
m
R
a
t
e
s
P
a
g
e
9
VI
I
.
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
r
e
d
i
t
S
p
r
e
a
d
s
P
a
g
e
1
0
VI
I
I
.
Ta
x
a
b
l
e
a
n
d
T
a
x
a
b
l
e
E
q
u
i
v
a
l
e
n
t
S
p
r
e
a
d
s
P
a
g
e
1
1
IX
.
Ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
C
a
l
e
n
d
a
r
P
a
g
e
1
2
X.
Su
p
p
l
y
C
a
l
e
n
d
a
r
P
a
g
e
1
3
XI
.
Su
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
S
a
l
e
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
P
a
g
e
1
4
Ta
b
l
e
o
f
C
o
n
t
e
n
t
s
No
t
e
:
F
u
l
l
d
e
t
a
i
l
s
o
f
d
e
a
l
s
>
$
2
5
M
M
p
r
i
c
i
n
g
1
2
/
0
8
/
2
0
1
4
–
1
2
/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
a
s
s
e
p
a
r
a
t
e
f
i
l
e
.
12
/
0
8
/
2
0
1
4
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
1
2
/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
1
I.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
D
a
t
a
MM
D
A
A
A
G
.
O
.
C
u
r
v
e
MM
D
A
A
A
G
.
O
.
Y
i
e
l
d
C
u
r
v
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
So
u
r
c
e
:
T
h
o
m
s
o
n
R
e
u
t
e
r
s
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
1
We
e
k
Ag
o
1
Month Ago1 Year Ago
2
y
e
a
r
0.
3
9
0
.
3
7
0
.
3
8
0
.
3
3
5
Y
e
a
r
1.
2
2
1
.
1
5
1
.
1
5
1
.
1
8
7
Y
e
a
r
1.
6
7
1
.
6
6
1
.
7
4
1
.
9
7
10
Y
e
a
r
2.
0
1
2
.
0
6
2
.
1
7
2
.
7
2
30
Y
e
a
r
2.
9
0
2
.
9
8
3
.
0
7
4
.
1
6
Sp
o
t
R
a
t
e
s
1 We
e
k
Ag
o
1
Mo
n
t
h
Ag
o
1
Ye
a
r
Ag
o
2
y
e
a
r
21
6
5
Y
e
a
r
77
4
7
Y
e
a
r
1-
7
-
3
0
10
Y
e
a
r
-5
-
1
6
-
7
1
30
Y
e
a
r
-8
-
1
7
-
1
2
6
Δ i
n
S
p
o
t
R
a
t
e
s
(
b
a
s
i
s
p
o
i
n
t
s
)
-2
5
-2
0
-1
5
-1
0
-50510
13
5
7
9
1
1
1
3
1
5
1
7
1
9
2
1
2
3
2
5
2
7
2
9
Change in Basis Points
Ma
t
u
r
i
t
y
Y
e
a
r
No
w
vs
On
e
Week AgoNow vs One Month Ago
2
I.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
D
a
t
a
MM
D
R
a
t
e
s
O
v
e
r
T
i
m
e
Ra
t
e
a
n
d
S
p
r
e
a
d
M
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
So
u
r
c
e
:
T
h
o
m
s
o
n
R
e
u
t
e
r
s
0.
0
%
1.
0
%
2.
0
%
3.
0
%
4.
0
%
5.
0
%
6.
0
%
Yield
Ma
t
u
r
i
t
y
Y
e
a
r
MM
D
R
a
n
g
e
(
o
v
e
r
p
a
s
t
1
0
y
e
a
r
s
)
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
M
M
D
Av
e
r
a
g
e
M
M
D
(
o
v
e
r
p
a
s
t
1
0
Y
e
a
r
s
)
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
A
v
e
r
a
g
e
M
i
n
i
m
u
m
M
a
x
i
m
u
m
2
Y
e
a
r
0.
3
9
1
.
5
3
0
.
2
5
3
.
8
1
5
Y
e
a
r
1.
2
2
2
.
1
2
0
.
6
2
3
.
9
7
7
Y
e
a
r
1.
6
7
2
.
5
3
0
.
8
9
4
.
2
2
10
Y
e
a
r
2.
0
1
3
.
0
1
1
.
4
7
4
.
8
6
30
Y
e
a
r
2.
9
0
4
.
0
9
2
.
4
7
5
.
9
4
MM
D
R
a
n
g
e
(
%
)
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
L
a
s
t
W
e
e
k
L
a
s
t
M
o
n
t
h
L
a
s
t
Y
e
a
r
10
-
Y
r
A
A
A
M
M
D
2.
0
7
2
.
0
6
2
.
1
0
2
.
6
6
A
S
p
r
e
a
d
t
o
A
A
A
56
b
p
s
5
6
b
p
s
5
8
b
p
s
7
9
b
p
s
Ra
t
e
a
n
d
S
p
r
e
a
d
5565758595105115
0.
8
%
1.
2
%
1.
6
%
2.
0
%
2.
4
%
2.
8
%
3.
2
%
Spread to MMD (bps)
Yield
Da
t
e
MM
D
1
0
y
r
A
G
O
1
0
y
r
S
p
r
e
a
d
3
I.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
D
a
t
a
20
-
Y
e
a
r
S
p
o
t
R
a
t
e
s
10
-
Y
e
a
r
S
p
o
t
R
a
t
e
s
So
u
r
c
e
:
B
l
o
o
m
b
e
r
g
,
M
M
A
,
&
T
h
o
m
s
o
n
R
e
u
t
e
r
s
1.
2
5
%
1.
7
5
%
2.
2
5
%
2.
7
5
%
3.
2
5
%
Da
t
e
Co
n
s
e
n
s
u
s
M
e
d
i
a
n
Y
i
e
l
d
s
10
-
Y
e
a
r
M
M
D
A
A
A
G
O
Y
i
e
l
d
s
10
-
Y
e
a
r
T
r
e
a
s
u
r
y
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
L
a
s
t
W
e
e
k
L
a
s
t
M
o
n
t
h
L
a
s
t
Y
e
a
r
MM
D
2.
0
1
2
.
0
7
2
.
1
7
2
.
7
2
Tr
e
a
s
u
r
y
2.
1
0
2
.
3
1
2
.
3
7
2
.
8
8
MM
D
/
T
S
Y
96
%
9
0
%
9
1
%
9
5
%
Co
n
s
e
n
s
u
s
2.
3
1
2
.
3
6
2
.
3
7
2
.
9
4
10
Y
e
a
r
R
a
t
e
s
2.
0
0
%
2.
4
0
%
2.
8
0
%
3.
2
0
%
3.
6
0
%
4.
0
0
%
4.
4
0
%
4.
8
0
%
D
a
t
e
C
o
n
s
e
n
s
u
s
M
e
d
i
a
n
Y
i
e
l
d
s
20
-
Y
e
a
r
M
M
D
A
A
A
G
O
Y
i
e
l
d
s
20
-
Y
e
a
r
T
r
e
a
s
u
r
y
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
L
a
s
t
W
e
e
k
L
a
s
t
M
o
n
t
h
L
a
s
t
Y
e
a
r
MM
D
2.
6
1
2
.
6
8
2
.
8
0
3
.
8
2
Tr
e
a
s
u
r
y
2.
7
7
2
.
9
7
3
.
1
1
3
.
8
9
MM
D
/
T
S
Y
94
%
9
0
%
9
0
%
9
8
%
Co
n
s
e
n
s
u
s
3.
6
5
3
.
7
1
3
.
7
0
4
.
5
5
20
Y
e
a
r
R
a
t
e
s
4
Supply
Demand
Rate and Spread Movement
Source: Bloomberg, TM3, ICI
II. Historical Supply and Demand
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14
Th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
Date
Taxable Tax-Exempt Total
($15)
($10)
($5)
$0
$5
$10
Bi
l
l
i
o
n
s
Date
Inflows (Outflows)
55
65
75
85
95
105
115
0.8%
1.2%
1.6%
2.0%
2.4%
2.8%
3.2%
Sp
r
e
a
d
t
o
M
M
D
(
b
p
s
)
Yi
e
l
d
Date
MMD 10 yr A GO 10 yr Spread
5
II
I
.
C
u
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
V
i
s
i
b
l
e
S
u
p
p
l
y
20
1
4
v
s
2
0
1
3
C
u
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
30
-
D
a
y
V
i
s
i
b
l
e
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
S
u
p
p
l
y
So
u
r
c
e
:
B
l
o
o
m
b
e
r
g
&
T
h
o
m
s
o
n
R
e
u
t
e
r
s
4t
h
Q
2
0
1
3
a
n
d
2
0
1
4
W
e
e
k
l
y
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
$0
$5
0
$1
0
0
$1
5
0
$2
0
0
$2
5
0
$3
0
0
$3
5
0
Billions
Da
t
e
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
2
0
1
4
AM
T
2
0
1
4
Ta
x
a
b
l
e
2
0
1
4
Ta
x
a
b
l
e
2
0
1
3
AM
T
2
0
1
3
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
2
0
1
3
0
5,
0
0
0
10
,
0
0
0
15
,
0
0
0
20
,
0
0
0
(millions)
Da
t
e
30
-
D
a
y
V
i
s
i
b
l
e
S
u
p
p
l
y
2013 2014
6
IV
.
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
B
o
n
d
F
l
o
w
s
Mo
n
t
h
l
y
M
u
t
u
a
l
F
u
n
d
I
n
f
l
o
w
s
(
O
u
t
f
l
o
w
s
)
Cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e
2
0
1
0
-
2
0
1
4
I
n
f
l
o
w
s
(
O
u
t
f
l
o
w
s
)
So
u
r
c
e
:
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
C
o
mp
a
n
y
I
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
e
(
I
C
I
)
Am
o
u
n
t
i
n
M
i
l
l
i
o
n
s
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
2,455
$
Mi
n
i
m
u
m
(7,676)
$
A
v
e
r
a
g
e
(34)
$
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
841
$
Fu
n
d
I
n
f
l
o
w
s
(
O
u
t
f
l
o
w
s
)
R
a
n
g
e
($
2
0
)
($
1
5
)
($
1
0
)
($
5
)
$0$5
$1
0
Billions
Da
t
e
($6)
($9)
($12)
($13)
($12)
($11)
($13)
($11)
($9)
($6)
($1)
$4
$12
$16
$18
$23
$27
$32
$38
$42
$47
$52
$49
$56
$59
$59
$57
$58 $41 $31 $20 $13 $7 $3 ($7)($7)($5)($4)($2)$1 $3 $5 $8 $11 $13 $16 $17
-$
2
0
-$
1
0
$0
$1
0
$2
0
$3
0
$4
0
$5
0
$6
0
$7
0
Billions
Da
t
e
7
V.
B
i
d
s
W
a
n
t
e
d
a
n
d
P
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
R
a
t
i
o
Bi
d
s
W
a
n
t
e
d
Pl
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
R
a
t
i
o
So
u
r
c
e
:
B
l
o
o
m
b
e
r
g
0
50
0
1,
0
0
0
1,
5
0
0
2,
0
0
0
2,
5
0
0
3,
0
0
0
3,
5
0
0
4,
0
0
0
4,
5
0
0
5,
0
0
0
$millions
Pa
r
Am
o
u
n
t
0
5,
0
0
0
10
,
0
0
0
15
,
0
0
0
20
,
0
0
0
CU
S
I
P
s
Qu
o
t
e
d
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
A
v
e
r
a
g
e
M
i
n
i
m
u
m
M
a
x
i
m
u
m
Pa
r
A
m
o
u
n
t
(
$
M
M
)
$3
,
1
7
8
$
3
,
4
5
2
$
1
,
4
0
8
$
5
,
8
7
3
CU
S
I
P
s
Q
u
o
t
e
d
12
,
4
7
2
1
4
,
2
7
8
8
,
7
3
5
2
2
,
7
0
6
We
e
k
l
y
B
i
d
W
a
n
t
e
d
S
t
a
t
i
s
t
i
c
s
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
A
v
e
r
a
g
e
M
i
n
i
m
u
m
M
a
x
i
m
u
m
Pl
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
R
a
t
i
o
96
%
9
5
%
7
0
%
1
0
0
%
We
e
k
l
y
P
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
R
a
t
i
o
S
t
a
t
i
s
t
i
c
s
65
%
70
%
75
%
80
%
85
%
90
%
95
%
10
0
%
10
5
%
*
D
a
t
a
n
o
t
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
a
f
t
e
r
1
1
/
0
8
/
2
0
1
3
8
VI
.
T
a
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
R
a
t
i
o
s
a
n
d
S
h
o
r
t
-
T
e
r
m
R
a
t
e
s
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
–
T
r
e
a
s
u
r
y
R
a
t
i
o
s
SI
F
M
A
,
V
R
D
,
3
-
M
o
n
t
h
N
o
t
e
,
a
n
d
L
I
B
O
R
So
u
r
c
e
:
B
l
o
o
m
b
e
r
g
&
T
h
o
m
s
o
n
R
e
u
t
e
r
s
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
A
v
e
r
a
g
e
M
i
n
i
m
u
m
M
a
x
i
m
u
m
2
Y
e
a
r
72
7
8
5
4
1
1
0
5
Y
e
a
r
80
7
2
6
2
8
0
10
Y
e
a
r
96
9
0
8
2
9
8
30
Y
e
a
r
10
5
1
0
1
9
3
1
0
9
T
a
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
-
T
r
e
a
s
u
r
y
R
a
t
i
o
s
(
%
)
0.
0
0
%
0.
0
5
%
0.
1
0
%
0.
1
5
%
Yield
Da
t
e
VRD Market Average3 Month Note SIFMALIBOR
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
A
v
e
r
a
g
e
M
i
n
i
m
u
m
M
a
x
i
m
u
m
3
M
o
n
t
h
N
o
t
e
0.
0
2
0
.
0
3
0
.
0
0
0
.
0
8
SI
F
M
A
0.
0
4
0
.
0
5
0
.
0
3
0
.
1
2
VR
D
0.
0
5
0
.
0
6
0
.
0
3
0
.
1
3
LI
B
O
R
0.
1
1
0
.
0
9
0
.
0
8
0
.
1
1
Sh
o
r
t
T
e
r
m
R
a
t
i
o
s
(
%
)
9
VI
I
.
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
r
e
d
i
t
S
p
r
e
a
d
s
G.
O
.
S
p
r
e
a
d
s
t
o
A
A
A
M
M
D
(
1
0
y
r
)
Re
v
e
n
u
e
S
p
r
e
a
d
s
t
o
A
A
A
M
M
D
(
1
0
y
r
)
AM
T
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
S
p
r
e
a
d
s
t
o
A
A
A
M
M
D
(
1
0
y
r
)
B.
Q
.
(
G
.
O
.
)
S
p
r
e
a
d
s
t
o
A
A
A
M
M
D
(
1
0
y
r
)
So
u
r
c
e
:
T
h
o
m
s
o
n
R
e
u
t
e
r
s
32
29
87
64
16
2
109
020406080
10
0
12
0
14
0
16
0
18
0
20
0
Basis Points
AA
A
BBB
77
62
13
2
97
20
7
142
507090
11
0
13
0
15
0
17
0
19
0
21
0
23
0
Basis Points
AA
A
BBB
12
11
67
46
14
2
91
020406080
10
0
12
0
14
0
16
0
18
0
Basis Points
AA
A
BB
B
10
VI
I
I
.
T
a
x
a
b
l
e
a
n
d
T
a
x
a
b
l
e
E
q
u
i
v
a
l
e
n
t
S
p
r
e
a
d
s
So
u
r
c
e
:
B
l
o
o
m
b
e
r
g
&
T
h
o
m
s
o
n
R
e
u
t
e
r
s
Co
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
S
p
r
e
a
d
s
t
o
T
r
e
a
s
u
r
i
e
s
(
1
0
y
r
)
Ta
x
a
b
l
e
-
E
q
u
i
v
a
l
e
n
t
S
p
r
ea
d
s
t
o
T
r
e
a
s
u
r
i
e
s
(
1
0
y
r
)
Ta
x
a
b
l
e
-
E
q
u
i
v
a
l
e
n
t
S
p
r
e
a
d
s
t
o
C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
s
(
1
0
y
r
)
77
83
12
4
10
9
16
3
16
9
050
10
0
15
0
20
0
25
0
30
0
35
0
Basis Points
Aa
/
A
A
A/
A
Ba
a
/
B
B
B
13
5
101
21
6
151
32
1
215
050
10
0
15
0
20
0
25
0
30
0
35
0
Basis Points
Aa
/
A
A
A/ABaa/BBB
58
18
93
42
15
8
47
0
50
10
0
15
0
20
0
25
0
30
0
35
0
Basis Points
Aa
/
A
A
A/
A
Ba
a
/
B
B
B
11
Source: Bloomberg
Weekly Municipal Market Update PFMIX. Economic Calendar
DateTime Statistic PeriodSurveyActualPriorRevised
12/15/148:30 AMEmpire Manufacturing Dec12 --10.16--
12/15/149:15 AMIndustrial Production MoM Nov0.70%---0.10%--
12/15/149:15 AMCapacity Utilization Nov79.30%--78.90%--
12/15/149:15 AMManufacturing (SIC) Production Nov0.60%--0.20%--
12/15/1410:00 AMNAHB Housing Market Index Dec59 --58 --
12/15/144:00 PMNet Long-term TIC Flows Oct ----$164.3B--
12/15/144:00 PMTotal Net TIC Flows Oct -----$55.6B--
12/16/148:30 AMHousing Starts Nov1040K--1009K--
12/16/148:30 AMHousing Starts MoM Nov3.10%---2.80%--
12/16/148:30 AMBuilding Permits Nov1060K--1080K1092K
12/16/148:30 AMBuilding Permits MoM Nov-2.90%--4.80%5.90%
12/16/149:45 AMMarkit US Manufacturing PMI Dec P56 --54.8--
12/17/147:00 AMMBA Mortgage Applications 12-Dec----7.30%--
12/17/148:30 AMCPI MoM Nov-0.10%--0.00%--
12/17/148:30 AMCPI Ex Food and Energy MoM Nov0.10%--0.20%--
12/17/148:30 AMCPI YoY Nov1.40%--1.70%--
12/17/148:30 AMCPI Ex Food and Energy YoY Nov1.80%--1.80%--
12/17/148:30 AMCPI Core Index SA Nov239.485--239.162--
12/17/148:30 AMCPI Index NSA Nov236.367--237.433--
12/17/148:30 AMCurrent Account Balance 3Q-$99.0B---$98.5B--
12/17/142:00 PMFed Summary of Economic Projections
12/17/142:00 PMFOMC Rate Decision (Upper Bound)17-Dec0.25%--0.25%--
12/17/142:00 PMFOMC Rate Decision (Lower Bound)17-Dec----0.00%--
12/18/148:30 AMInitial Jobless Claims 13-Dec295K--294K--
12/18/148:30 AMContinuing Claims 6-Dec----2514K--
12/18/149:45 AMMarkit US Composite PMI Dec P----56.1--
12/18/149:45 AMMarkit US Services PMI Dec P----56.2--
12/18/149:45 AMBloomberg Consumer Comfort 14-Dec----41.3--
12/18/149:45 AMBloomberg Economic Expectations Dec ----47 --
12/18/1410:00 AMPhiladelphia Fed Business Outlook Dec27 --40.8--
12/18/1410:00 AMLeading Index Nov0.50%--0.90%--
12/19/1411:00 AMKansas City Fed Manf. Activity Dec 8 --7 --
Economic Calendar (Between 12/15/2014 and 12/19/2014)
12
Source: Bloomberg
Weekly Municipal Market Update PFMX. Supply Calendar
Amount
($000s)Issuer State Ratings
(M/S/F)Sale TypeTax StatusLead ManagerSale Date
436,410 DASNY INCOME TAX -E -REFNY--/AAA/--NegotiatedTax-ExemptBANK OF AMERICA MERRILL12/15/2014
380,450 AZ TRANSPRTN BRDAZ--/--/--NegotiatedTax-ExemptCITIGROUP GLOBAL MKTS INC12/15/2014
317,285 MIAMI-DADE CNTY SCH BRD-AFL--/--/--NegotiatedTax-ExemptBANK OF AMERICA MERRILL12/15/2014
314,780 ARIZONA HLTH FACS AUTH -AAZ--/--/--NegotiatedTax-ExemptMORGAN STANLEY & CO INC12/15/2014
300,000 LOS ANGELES CMTY CLG DT-GCAAa1/AA+/--NegotiatedTax-ExemptMORGAN STANLEY12/15/2014
230,000 NYC HSG DEV CORP A-1NY--/--/--NegotiatedTax-ExemptMORGAN STANLEY & CO INC12/15/2014
229,000 LOS ANGELES WTR & PWR DEPCA--/AA-/--NegotiatedTax-ExemptSIEBERT BRANDFORD SHANK12/15/2014
129,550 OHIO WTR DEV AUTH-REFOHAaa/AAA/--NegotiatedTax-ExemptJEFFERIES LLC12/15/2014
100,000 GTR CHICAGO MET WTR-GREENIL--/AAA/--NegotiatedTax-ExemptMORGAN STANLEY & CO INC12/15/2014
90,980 GAINESVILLE -WTR&SEW -REFGA--/--/--CompetitiveTax-Exempt--12/16/2014
84,880 ME HLTH & HGR ED FAC AUTHME--/--/--NegotiatedTax-ExemptMORGAN STANLEY & CO INC12/15/2014
84,280 EL PASO ISD -REFTX--/AAA/AAANegotiatedTax-ExemptPIPER JAFFRAY & CO12/15/2014
83,000 PEACE RIVER REGL WTR SUPPFL--/--/--NegotiatedTax-ExemptCITIGROUP GLOBAL MKTS INC12/15/2014
76,575 NYS DORM AUTH -REF -ANY--/--/--NegotiatedTax-ExemptJANNEY MONTGOMERY SCOTT12/15/2014
75,000 GREATER CHICAGO MET WTR-DIL--/AAA/--NegotiatedTax-ExemptMORGAN STANLEY & CO INC12/15/2014
75,000 GTR CHICAGO MET WTR-GREENIL--/AAA/--NegotiatedTax-ExemptMORGAN STANLEY & CO INC12/15/2014
64,765 TAMPA SPORTS AUTH -REFFL--/--/--CompetitiveTax-Exempt--12/16/2014
57,690 AR DEV FIN AUTH -REF -BARBaa1/--/--NegotiatedTax-ExemptCREWS & ASSOCIATES INC12/15/2014
57,290 DASNY-INCOME TAX-G-TXBLNY--/AAA/--NegotiatedTaxableBANK OF AMERICA MERRILL12/15/2014
54,515 BOLINGBROOK VLGILA1/--/--NegotiatedTax-ExemptWILLIAM BLAIR & COMPANY12/15/2014
50,000 GTR CHICAGO MET WTR-GREENIL--/AAA/--NegotiatedTax-ExemptMORGAN STANLEY & CO INC12/15/2014
40,645 FLORIDA DEV FIN CORP -AFL--/--/--NegotiatedTax-ExemptHERBERT J. SIMS & CO INC12/15/2014
37,500 PUBLIC FIN AUTH -B -TXBLWI--/--/--NegotiatedTaxableMORGAN STANLEY & CO INC12/15/2014
36,255 HAMMOND BOND BANK-TXBL-AIN--/BB+/--NegotiatedTaxableFIFTH THIRD SECURITIES12/15/2014
33,980 ROUND ROCK -REFTX--/--/--NegotiatedTax-ExemptBOSC INC12/15/2014
33,915 FAIRFIELD COOH--/--/--NegotiatedTax-ExemptROBERT W. BAIRD & CO INC12/15/2014
33,810 TOMPKINS CO DEV CORP -ANY--/BBB/--NegotiatedTax-ExemptZIEGLER CAPITAL MKTS GRP12/15/2014
33,315 ST TAMMANY PUB FING AUTHLA--/--/--NegotiatedTax-ExemptZIEGLER CAPITAL MKTS GRP12/15/2014
32,000 FLORIN RESOURCE CNSV DTCA--/--/--NegotiatedTax-ExemptCITIGROUP GLOBAL MKTS INC12/15/2014
30,745 AR DEV FIN AUTH -AARBaa1/--/--NegotiatedTax-ExemptCREWS & ASSOCIATES INC12/15/2014
30,665 IL HSG DEV AUTH -REF -A1ILAa3/--/--NegotiatedTax-ExemptCITIGROUP GLOBAL MKTS INC12/15/2014
30,000 MASSACHUSETTS CMWLTH -14MA--/--/--NegotiatedTax-ExemptCITIGROUP GLOBAL MKTS INC12/15/2014
29,785 CINCINNATI CSD -TXBL-COPSOHAa3/A+/--NegotiatedTaxableFIFTH THIRD SECURITIES12/15/2014
29,615 HENRY COGA--/--/--NegotiatedTax-ExemptRAYMOND JAMES & ASSOCS12/15/2014
28,575 MIDDLESEX CO IMP AUTHNJ--/AAA/--NegotiatedTax-ExemptNW CAPITAL MARKETS INC12/15/2014
26,435 CALEDONIA COMM SCHS -REFMI--/AA-/--NegotiatedTax-ExemptFIFTH THIRD SECURITIES12/15/2014
25,000 MA DEV FIN AGY -AMA--/--/--NegotiatedTax-ExemptBANK OF AMERICA MERRILL12/15/2014
Week of 12/15/14 Supply Calendar
13
XI
.
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
S
a
l
e
s
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
We
e
k
o
f
1
2
/
8
/
1
4
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
Se
r
i
e
s
:
Sa
l
e
D
a
t
e
:
Pa
r
A
m
o
u
n
t
:
Un
d
e
r
w
r
i
t
e
r
:
Ne
g
/
C
o
m
p
:
Ta
x
S
t
a
t
u
s
:
In
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
:
In
s
u
r
e
d
R
a
t
i
n
g
s
:
Un
d
e
r
l
y
i
n
g
R
a
t
i
n
g
s
:
Fi
r
s
t
C
a
l
l
D
a
t
e
:
Ma
t
u
r
i
t
y
Y
e
a
r
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2)ROY Spread(1)OAY Spread(2)
1
4.
0
4
.
0
2
1
.
0
-1
6
.
0
1
1
.
0
2
10
.
0
23
.
0
-1
5
.
0
1
6
.
0
3
11
.
0
28
.
0
-1
1
.
0
28.0
4
13
.
0
40
.
0
-1
2
.
0
30.0
5
15
.
0
49
.
0
-8
.
0
43.0
6
18
.
0
58
.
0
-9
.
0
49.0
7
21
.
0
62
.
0
-3
.
0
58.0
8
25
.
0
67
.
0
4.
0
72.0
9
27
.
0
71
.
0
5.
0
79.0
10
30
.
0
72
.
0
4.
0
84.0
11
33
.
0
44
.
6
74
.
0
82
.
3
7.
0
78.0
12
35
.
0
38
.
8
75
.
0
72
.
3
35
.
0
90.0
13
37
.
0
32
.
2
45
.
0
14
40
.
0
27
.
6
64
.
0
15
40
.
0
21
.
2
40
.
0
21
.
2
64
.
0
101.5
16
80
.
0
44
.
6
40
.
0
17
.
4
63
.
0
17
40
.
0
14
.
0
62
.
0
18
80
.
0
37
.
3
62
.
0
19
85
.
0
37
.
8
45
.
0
62
.
0
20
85
.
0
37
.
3
62
.
0
21 22
85
.
0
33
.
1
23 24
45
.
0
25
40
.
0
2.
7
26 27 28 29
48
.
0
30
40
.
0
-1
.
9
Aa2/AA+/NR 7/1/2016NA
NR
/
A
A
A
/
A
A
+
8/
1
/
2
0
2
4
NYC HSG DEV-G-1 12/11/2014 $192,510,000 JP MORGAN SECURITIES LLC NEGOTIATED Tax-Exempt
NA
Aa
2
/
A
A
+
/
N
R
2/
1
/
2
0
2
5
SA
L
T
L
A
K
E
S
A
L
E
S
T
A
X
12
/
1
1
/
2
0
1
4
$3
0
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
MO
R
G
A
N
S
T
A
N
L
E
Y
&
C
O
I
N
C
CO
M
P
E
T
I
T
I
V
E
Tax
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
Aa
3
/
A
A
-
/
N
R
10
/
1
/
2
0
2
4
SE
D
G
W
I
C
K
C
O
P
U
B
B
L
D
G
12
/
1
1
/
2
0
1
4
$3
8
,
8
9
5
,
0
0
0
BM
O
C
A
P
I
T
A
L
M
A
R
K
E
T
S
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
Aa
2
/
A
A
/
A
A
-
10
/
1
/
2
0
2
4
UN
I
V
O
F
I
L
L
I
N
O
I
S
-
C
O
P
S
12
/
1
1
/
2
0
1
4
$2
5
,
0
5
5
,
0
0
0
RB
C
C
A
P
I
T
A
L
M
A
R
K
E
T
S
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
Aa
2
/
A
A
/
A
A
-
10
/
1
/
2
0
2
4
GA
I
N
E
S
V
I
L
L
E
U
T
L
S
Y
S
-
A
12
/
1
1
/
2
0
1
4
$3
7
,
8
3
5
,
0
0
0
JP
M
O
R
G
A
N
S
E
C
U
R
I
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
GA
I
N
E
S
V
I
L
L
E
U
T
L
S
Y
S
-
B
12
/
1
1
/
2
0
1
4
$3
0
,
9
7
0
,
0
0
0
JP
M
O
R
G
A
N
S
E
C
U
R
I
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
S
a
l
e
s
>
$
2
5
M
f
o
r
t
h
e
w
e
e
k
o
f
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
8
,
2
0
1
4
Bl
u
e
=
P
r
i
c
e
d
t
o
C
a
l
l
D
a
t
e
RO
Y
=
R
e
o
f
f
e
r
Y
i
e
l
d
Re
o
f
f
e
r
Y
i
e
l
d
S
p
r
e
a
d
t
o
t
h
e
I
n
t
e
r
p
o
l
a
t
e
d
M
M
D
(F
u
l
l
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
D
e
t
a
i
l
s
f
o
r
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
w
e
e
k
’
s
s
a
l
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
a
c
c
o
m
p
a
n
y
i
n
g
f
i
l
e
)
14
XI
.
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
S
a
l
e
s
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
We
e
k
o
f
1
2
/
8
/
1
4
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
Se
r
i
e
s
:
Sa
l
e
D
a
t
e
:
Pa
r
A
m
o
u
n
t
:
Un
d
e
r
w
r
i
t
e
r
:
Ne
g
/
C
o
m
p
:
Ta
x
S
t
a
t
u
s
:
In
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
:
In
s
u
r
e
d
R
a
t
i
n
g
s
:
Un
d
e
r
l
y
i
n
g
R
a
t
i
n
g
s
:
Fi
r
s
t
C
a
l
l
D
a
t
e
:
Ma
t
u
r
i
t
y
Y
e
a
r
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2)ROY Spread(1)OAY Spread(2)
1
0.
0
1
1
.
0
24
.
0
3
1
.
0
6
.
0
2
0.
0
1
6
.
0
27
.
0
3
1
.
0
1
4
.
0
3
-1
.
0
23
.
0
33
.
0
23
.
0
16.0
4
-2
.
0
30
.
0
34
.
0
30
.
0
20.0
5
-2
.
0
33
.
0
39
.
0
38
.
0
25.0
6
-2
.
0
44
.
0
40
.
0
39
.
0
7
-1
.
0
63
.
0
52
.
0
38
.
0
8
2.
0
72
.
0
56
.
0
37
.
0
9
5.
0
84
.
0
60
.
0
44
.
0
10
5.
0
84
.
0
63
.
0
54
.
0
11
7.
0
88
.
0
67
.
0
68
.
0
12
10
.
0
85
.
0
67
.
0
80
.
0
13
10
.
0
70
.
0
84
.
0
14
10
.
0
70
.
0
15
10
.
0
70
.
0
16
10
.
0
44
.
0
70
.
0
17
10
.
0
99
.
0
44
.
0
70
.
0
18
10
.
0
44
.
0
70
.
0
19
10
.
0
43
.
0
70
.
0
20
10
.
0
70
.
0
21 22 23 24
40
.
0
25
11
7
.
0
26 27 28 29 30
Aa1/AA/NR Non-callableNA
A1
/
N
R
/
N
R
12
/
1
/
2
0
2
4
HOUSTON TX INDEP SCH 12/11/2014 $82,115,000 LOOP CAPITAL MARKETS NEGOTIATED Tax-Exempt
BA
M
A1
e
/
A
A
/
N
R
NR
/
A
A
-
/
N
R
5/
1
/
2
0
2
5
JE
R
S
E
Y
C
I
T
Y
12
/
1
1
/
2
0
1
4
$3
1
,
8
2
0
,
0
0
0
UB
S
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
R
V
C
S
I
N
C
CO
M
P
E
T
I
T
I
V
E
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
Q-
S
B
L
F
NR
/
A
A
-
/
N
R
Aa
2
/
A
A
+
/
N
R
12
/
1
/
2
0
2
4
L'A
N
S
E
C
R
E
U
S
E
-
R
E
F
12
/
1
1
/
2
0
1
4
$1
1
8
,
3
5
5
,
0
0
0
JP
M
O
R
G
A
N
S
E
C
U
R
I
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
Aa
a
/
N
R
/
N
R
12
/
1
5
/
2
0
1
5
LA
S
V
E
G
A
S
V
L
Y
W
T
R
D
T
12
/
1
1
/
2
0
1
4
$3
3
2
,
4
0
5
,
0
0
0
CI
T
I
G
R
O
U
P
G
L
O
B
A
L
M
K
T
S
I
N
C
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
Aa
1
/
A
A
/
A
A
+
12
/
1
/
2
0
2
4
MA
R
Y
L
A
N
D
C
M
N
T
Y
D
E
V
-
I
12
/
1
1
/
2
0
1
4
$2
7
,
5
9
0
,
0
0
0
JP
M
O
R
G
A
N
S
E
C
U
R
I
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
NE
W
H
A
M
P
S
H
I
R
E
S
T
12
/
1
1
/
2
0
1
4
$5
5
,
0
0
5
,
0
0
0
CI
T
I
G
R
O
U
P
G
L
O
B
A
L
M
K
T
S
I
N
C
CO
M
P
E
T
I
T
I
V
E
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
S
a
l
e
s
>
$
2
5
M
f
o
r
t
h
e
w
e
e
k
o
f
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
8
,
2
0
1
4
Bl
u
e
=
P
r
i
c
e
d
t
o
C
a
l
l
D
a
t
e
RO
Y
=
R
e
o
f
f
e
r
Y
i
e
l
d
Re
o
f
f
e
r
Y
i
e
l
d
S
p
r
e
a
d
t
o
t
h
e
I
n
t
e
r
p
o
l
a
t
e
d
M
M
D
(F
u
l
l
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
D
e
t
a
i
l
s
f
o
r
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
w
e
e
k
’
s
s
a
l
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
a
c
c
o
m
p
a
n
y
i
n
g
f
i
l
e
)
15
XI
.
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
S
a
l
e
s
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
We
e
k
o
f
1
2
/
8
/
1
4
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
Se
r
i
e
s
:
Sa
l
e
D
a
t
e
:
Pa
r
A
m
o
u
n
t
:
Un
d
e
r
w
r
i
t
e
r
:
Ne
g
/
C
o
m
p
:
Ta
x
S
t
a
t
u
s
:
In
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
:
In
s
u
r
e
d
R
a
t
i
n
g
s
:
Un
d
e
r
l
y
i
n
g
R
a
t
i
n
g
s
:
Fi
r
s
t
C
a
l
l
D
a
t
e
:
Ma
t
u
r
i
t
y
Y
e
a
r
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2)ROY Spread(1)OAY Spread(2)
1
40
.
0
-
6
.
0
-6
.
0
-
2
2
.
0
2
45
.
0
3
.
0
3
.
0
3
.
0
-
2
1
.
0
-
1
.
0
3
49
.
0
8.
0
8.
0
8.
0
-1
8
.
0
8.0
4
53
.
0
10
.
0
10
.
0
10
.
0
-1
7
.
0
13.0
5
58
.
0
14
.
0
14
.
0
14
.
0
-1
4
.
0
21.0
6
63
.
0
14
.
0
14
.
0
14
.
0
-1
2
.
0
26.0
7
64
.
0
19
.
0
19
.
0
19
.
0
-5
.
0
32.0
8
67
.
0
23
.
0
23
.
0
23
.
0
2.
0
41.0
9
73
.
0
25
.
0
25
.
0
25
.
0
4.
0
47.0
10
72
.
0
26
.
0
26
.
0
26
.
0
5.
0
28
.
3
55.0
11
72
.
0
27
.
0
27
.
0
27
.
0
6.
0
23
.
2
59.065.8
12
75
.
0
27
.
0
27
.
0
27
.
0
9.
0
19
.
1
60.056.7
13
84
.
0
30
.
0
30
.
0
30
.
0
11
.
0
13
.
9
63.050.0
14
75
.
0
30
.
0
30
.
0
14
.
0
11
.
6
61.040.6
15
75
.
0
30
.
0
30
.
0
15
.
0
6.859.033.6
16
73
.
0
30
.
0
30
.
0
15
.
0
4.959.029.4
17
73
.
0
30
.
0
30
.
0
15
.
0
2.1
18
72
.
0
67
.
0
30
.
0
15
.
0
0.8
19
71
.
0
67
.
0
30
.
0
15
.
0
-0
.
6
20
95
.
0
15
.
0
-1
.
3
21
14
.
0
-2
.
6
22
14
.
0
-4
.
6
23
30
.
0
14
.
0
-5
.
2
24 25
65
.
0
30
.
0
14
.
0
-6
.
6
26 27 28 29 30
65
.
0
13
.
0
-1
1
.
3
Aa3/NR/AA-8/1/2025NA
Aa
a
/
A
A
A
/
A
A
A
2/
1
/
2
0
2
4
PALM BEACH CO-B-COPS 12/10/2014 $145,535,000 BANK OF AMERICA MERRILL NEGOTIATED Tax-Exempt
NA
Aa
a
/
A
A
+
/
A
A
A
6/
1
5
/
2
0
2
4
MA
S
S
A
CH
U
S
E
T
T
S
S
T
C
L
E
A
12
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
4
$2
2
8
,
1
5
5
,
0
0
0
JP
M
O
R
G
A
N
S
E
C
U
R
I
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
Aa
a
/
A
A
+
/
A
A
A
6/
1
5
/
2
0
2
4
BE
X
A
R
C
O
-
C
T
F
S
O
B
L
I
G
12
/
1
1
/
2
0
1
4
$8
6
,
4
8
0
,
0
0
0
MO
R
G
A
N
S
T
A
N
L
E
Y
&
C
O
I
N
C
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
Aa
a
/
A
A
+
/
A
A
A
6/
1
5
/
2
0
2
4
BE
X
AR
C
O
-
F
L
O
O
D
-
R
E
F
12
/
1
1
/
2
0
1
4
$1
1
2
,
0
1
0
,
0
0
0
MO
R
G
A
N
S
T
A
N
L
E
Y
&
C
O
I
N
C
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
A2
/
N
R
/
N
R
10
/
1
/
2
0
2
4
BE
X
A
R
C
O
-
R
E
F
12
/
1
1
/
2
0
1
4
$5
4
,
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
MO
R
G
A
N
S
T
A
N
L
E
Y
&
C
O
I
N
C
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
DE
L
A
W
A
R
E
S
T
U
N
I
V
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
12
/
1
1
/
2
0
1
4
$2
9
,
4
2
0
,
0
0
0
WE
L
L
S
F
A
R
G
O
B
A
N
K
N
.
A
.
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
S
a
l
e
s
>
$
2
5
M
f
o
r
t
h
e
w
e
e
k
o
f
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
8
,
2
0
1
4
Bl
u
e
=
P
r
i
c
e
d
t
o
C
a
l
l
D
a
t
e
RO
Y
=
R
e
o
f
f
e
r
Y
i
e
l
d
Re
o
f
f
e
r
Y
i
e
l
d
S
p
r
e
a
d
t
o
t
h
e
I
n
t
e
r
p
o
l
a
t
e
d
M
M
D
(F
u
l
l
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
D
e
t
a
i
l
s
f
o
r
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
w
e
e
k
’
s
s
a
l
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
a
c
c
o
m
p
a
n
y
i
n
g
f
i
l
e
)
16
XI
.
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
S
a
l
e
s
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
We
e
k
o
f
1
2
/
8
/
1
4
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
Se
r
i
e
s
:
Sa
l
e
D
a
t
e
:
Pa
r
A
m
o
u
n
t
:
Un
d
e
r
w
r
i
t
e
r
:
Ne
g
/
C
o
m
p
:
Ta
x
S
t
a
t
u
s
:
In
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
:
In
s
u
r
e
d
R
a
t
i
n
g
s
:
Un
d
e
r
l
y
i
n
g
R
a
t
i
n
g
s
:
Fi
r
s
t
C
a
l
l
D
a
t
e
:
Ma
t
u
r
i
t
y
Y
e
a
r
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2)ROY Spread(1)OAY Spread(2)
1
20
.
0
5
6
.
0
3
7
.
0
2
9.
0
30
.
0
6
7
.
0
3
9
.
0
3
10
.
0
35
.
0
82
.
0
42
.
0
20.0
4
11
.
0
2.
0
40
.
0
97
.
0
47
.
0
20.0
5
21
.
0
3.
0
45
.
0
10
9
.
0
52
.
0
24.0
6
25
.
0
50
.
0
11
8
.
0
57
.
0
32.0
7
31
.
0
55
.
0
12
4
.
0
60
.
0
31.0
8
40
.
0
60
.
0
13
1
.
0
66
.
0
38.0
9
43
.
0
64
.
0
13
6
.
0
68
.
0
38.0
10
44
.
0
57
.
2
18
.
0
66
.
0
14
2
.
0
72
.
0
35.0
11
46
.
0
54
.
5
21
.
0
74
.
0
14
2
.
0
74
.
0
50.0
12
46
.
0
45
.
1
21
.
0
77
.
0
14
2
.
0
75
.
0
38.0
13
80
.
0
61
.
9
21
.
0
78
.
0
14
2
.
0
75
.
0
87.0
14
79
.
0
54
.
1
78
.
0
14
2
.
0
75
.
0
87.0
15
80
.
0
49
.
9
78
.
0
75
.
0
16
49
.
0
23
.
3
78
.
0
75
.
0
17
49
.
0
20
.
0
18
49
.
0
17
.
8
15
7
.
0
19 20
73
.
0
73
.
0
21 22 23 24 25
72
.
0
26 27 28 29 30
69
.
0
NR/AA/NR 8/15/2024NA
A3
/
N
R
/
N
R
10
/
1
/
2
0
2
4
SAN MARCOS-A-REF 12/10/2014 $40,690,000 RAYMOND JAMES & ASSOCS NEGOTIATED Tax-Exempt
NA
NR
/
B
B
B
/
N
R
5/
1
/
2
0
2
4
UN
I
V
O
F
R
E
D
L
A
N
D
S
-
R
E
F
-
A
12
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
4
$3
1
,
5
9
5
,
0
0
0
WE
L
L
S
F
A
R
G
O
B
A
N
K
N
.
A
.
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
A1
/
N
R
/
A
A
-
12
/
1
5
/
2
0
2
4
W
I
H
L
T
H
&
E
D
U
F
A
C
S
12
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
4
$2
8
,
1
9
5
,
0
0
0
PI
P
E
R
J
A
F
F
R
A
Y
&
C
O
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
Aa
2
/
A
A
/
A
A
11
/
1
/
2
0
2
4
W
I
H
L
T
H
&
E
D
U
C
T
N
L
12
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
4
$1
25
,
6
7
0
,
0
0
0
BA
N
K
O
F
A
M
E
R
I
C
A
M
E
R
R
I
L
L
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
NR
/
A
A
/
N
R
12
/
1
/
2
0
2
4
WI
S
C
O
N
S
I
N
S
T
-
4
-
R
E
F
12
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
4
$2
5
7
,
4
1
5
,
0
0
0
MO
R
G
A
N
S
T
A
N
L
E
Y
&
C
O
I
N
C
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
YO
R
K
C
N
-
B
-
R
E
F
12
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
4
$3
8
,
0
1
0
,
0
0
0
PN
C
C
A
P
I
T
A
L
M
A
R
K
E
T
S
L
L
C
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
S
a
l
e
s
>
$
2
5
M
f
o
r
t
h
e
w
e
e
k
o
f
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
8
,
2
0
1
4
Bl
u
e
=
P
r
i
c
e
d
t
o
C
a
l
l
D
a
t
e
RO
Y
=
R
e
o
f
f
e
r
Y
i
e
l
d
Re
o
f
f
e
r
Y
i
e
l
d
S
p
r
e
a
d
t
o
t
h
e
I
n
t
e
r
p
o
l
a
t
e
d
M
M
D
(F
u
l
l
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
D
e
t
a
i
l
s
f
o
r
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
w
e
e
k
’
s
s
a
l
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
a
c
c
o
m
p
a
n
y
i
n
g
f
i
l
e
)
17
XI
.
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
S
a
l
e
s
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
We
e
k
o
f
1
2
/
8
/
1
4
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
Se
r
i
e
s
:
Sa
l
e
D
a
t
e
:
Pa
r
A
m
o
u
n
t
:
Un
d
e
r
w
r
i
t
e
r
:
Ne
g
/
C
o
m
p
:
Ta
x
S
t
a
t
u
s
:
In
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
:
In
s
u
r
e
d
R
a
t
i
n
g
s
:
Un
d
e
r
l
y
i
n
g
R
a
t
i
n
g
s
:
Fi
r
s
t
C
a
l
l
D
a
t
e
:
Ma
t
u
r
i
t
y
Y
e
a
r
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2)ROY Spread(1)OAY Spread(2)
1
0.
0
-
1
4
.
0
1
8
6
.
0
1
.
0
2
2.
0
-
1
6
.
0
1
8
4
.
0
1
9
.
0
3
8.
0
-1
3
.
0
20
7
.
0
22
.
0
4
11
.
0
-1
2
.
0
30
.
0
5
21
.
0
-9
.
0
41
.
0
6
98
.
0
25
.
0
-7
.
0
59
.
0
7
10
3
.
0
28
.
0
-2
.
0
72
.
0
8
10
8
.
0
35
.
0
6.
0
84
.
0
9
11
4
.
0
39
.
0
8.
0
25
4
.
0
89
.
0
10
11
9
.
0
46
.
0
10
.
0
88
.
0
11
12
5
.
0
82
.
0
11
.
0
90
.
0
12
12
5
.
0
47
.
0
13
.
0
15.0
13
12
6
.
0
50
.
0
18
.
0
14
12
6
.
0
78
.
0
18
.
0
27
6
.
5
15
12
6
.
0
63
.
0
96
.
5
16
12
6
.
0
66
.
0
17
12
6
.
0
68
.
0
18
12
5
.
0
74
.
0
19
12
3
.
0
82
.
0
58
.
0
27
9
.
0
20
12
3
.
0
58
.
0
21 22 23
-8
9
.
0
24
46
.
0
25
11
7
.
0
26
27
4
.
0
27 28 29
44
.
0
30
Aa1/AAA/NR 6/15/2024NA
Aa
1
/
N
R
/
N
R
7/
1
/
2
0
2
4
NEW MEXICO FIN AUTH 12/10/2014 $61,380,000 RBC CAPITAL MARKETS NEGOTIATED Tax-Exempt
NA
NR
/
B
+
/
N
R
2/
1
/
2
0
2
4
NO
R
T
H
D
A
K
O
T
A
H
F
A
12
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
4
$5
3
,
9
2
0
,
0
0
0
RB
C
C
A
P
I
T
A
L
M
A
R
K
E
T
S
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
Aa
2
/
N
R
/
N
R
3/
1
/
2
0
2
4
PH
O
E
N
I
X
A
Z
I
N
D
L
D
E
V
A
12
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
4
$1
0
7
,
4
0
5
,
0
0
0
BA
R
C
L
A
Y
S
C
A
P
I
T
A
L
I
N
C
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
ST
A
I
D
W
I
T
H
H
L
D
G
Aa
2
/
A
A
+
/
A
A
+
Aa
3
/
A
+
/
N
R
8/
1
/
2
0
2
4
RI
C
H
M
O
N
D
12
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
4
$9
9
,
2
9
5
,
0
0
0
RA
Y
M
O
N
D
J
A
M
E
S
&
A
S
S
O
C
S
CO
M
P
E
T
I
T
I
V
E
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
Ba
a
2
/
A
-
/
B
B
B
+
11
/
1
/
2
0
2
4
S
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
C
T
R
E
G
L
W
T
R
12
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
4
$3
0
,
2
7
0
,
0
0
0
JA
N
N
E
Y
M
O
N
T
G
O
M
E
R
Y
S
C
O
T
T
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
S
J
E
R
S
E
Y
T
R
A
N
S
P
R
T
N
-
A
12
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
4
$1
1
2
,
3
0
5
,
0
0
0
CI
T
I
G
R
O
U
P
G
L
O
B
A
L
M
K
T
S
I
N
C
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
S
a
l
e
s
>
$
2
5
M
f
o
r
t
h
e
w
e
e
k
o
f
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
8
,
2
0
1
4
Bl
u
e
=
P
r
i
c
e
d
t
o
C
a
l
l
D
a
t
e
RO
Y
=
R
e
o
f
f
e
r
Y
i
e
l
d
Re
o
f
f
e
r
Y
i
e
l
d
S
p
r
e
a
d
t
o
t
h
e
I
n
t
e
r
p
o
l
a
t
e
d
M
M
D
(F
u
l
l
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
D
e
t
a
i
l
s
f
o
r
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
w
e
e
k
’
s
s
a
l
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
a
c
c
o
m
p
a
n
y
i
n
g
f
i
l
e
)
18
XI
.
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
S
a
l
e
s
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
We
e
k
o
f
1
2
/
8
/
1
4
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
Se
r
i
e
s
:
Sa
l
e
D
a
t
e
:
Pa
r
A
m
o
u
n
t
:
Un
d
e
r
w
r
i
t
e
r
:
Ne
g
/
C
o
m
p
:
Ta
x
S
t
a
t
u
s
:
In
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
:
In
s
u
r
e
d
R
a
t
i
n
g
s
:
Un
d
e
r
l
y
i
n
g
R
a
t
i
n
g
s
:
Fi
r
s
t
C
a
l
l
D
a
t
e
:
Ma
t
u
r
i
t
y
Y
e
a
r
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2)ROY Spread(1)OAY Spread(2)
1
-5
.
0
9.
0
-
1
4
.
0
2
2.
0
19
.
0
-
1
2
.
0
3
-1
5
.
0
20
.
0
6.
0
29
.
0
-10.0
4
-1
5
.
0
28
.
0
7.
0
-2
.
0
36
.
0
-9.0
5
-1
1
.
0
19
.
0
10
.
0
-1
.
0
41
.
0
-6.0
6
-8
.
0
35
.
0
14
.
0
1.
0
45
.
0
-5.0
7
-4
.
0
43
.
0
17
.
0
10
.
0
54
.
0
0.0
8
6.
0
53
.
0
20
.
0
18
.
0
63
.
0
6.0
9
6.
0
59
.
0
24
.
0
23
.
0
68
.
0
7.0
10
8.
0
60
.
0
29
.
0
29
.
0
75
.
0
13.0
11
9.
0
61
.
0
30
.
0
35
.
0
80
.
0
18.0
12
13
.
0
31
.
0
39
.
0
80
.
0
21.0
13
13
.
0
33
.
0
43
.
0
83
.
0
23.0
14
35
.
0
43
.
0
84
.
0
26.0
15
33
.
0
88
.
0
85
.
0
26.0
16
34
.
0
93
.
0
84
.
0
26.0
17
34
.
0
43
.
0
83
.
0
63.0
18
34
.
0
43
.
0
81
.
0
63.0
19
35
.
0
80
.
0
20
91
.
0
21 22 23 24
72
.
0
25
31
.
0
26 27 28 29 30
31
.
0
Aa1/AA+/NR 8/1/2024NA
A1
/
A
+
/
N
R
6/
1
/
2
0
2
4
LOS ANGELES CCD-A-REF 12/10/2014 $1,495,575,000 MORGAN STANLEY NEGOTIATED Tax-Exempt
NA
Aa
3
/
N
R
/
N
R
2/
1
/
2
0
2
5
MI
C
H
I
G
A
N
S
T
F
I
N
A
U
T
H
12
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
4
$1
7
0
,
5
9
5
,
0
0
0
RB
C
C
A
P
I
T
A
L
M
A
R
K
E
T
S
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
Aa
1
/
A
A
+
/
N
R
11
/
1
5
/
2
0
2
4
MO
N
T
E
B
E
L
L
O
C
A
U
N
I
F
S
C
12
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
4
$2
8
,
8
9
5
,
0
0
0
RB
C
C
A
P
I
T
A
L
M
A
R
K
E
T
S
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
NR
/
A
A
-
/
N
R
7/
1
5
/
2
0
2
3
N
E
R
E
G
L
S
W
R
D
I
S
T
-
R
E
F
12
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
4
$4
19
,
0
3
0
,
0
0
0
BA
N
K
O
F
A
M
E
R
I
C
A
M
E
R
R
I
L
L
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
S
T
A
I
D
W
I
T
H
H
L
D
G
NR
/
A
A
+
/
N
R
Aa
1
/
A
A
/
A
A
+
3/
1
/
2
0
2
5
N
W
A
L
L
E
N
I
N
S
C
H
B
L
D
G
12
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
4
$3
2
,
7
3
0
,
0
0
0
CI
T
Y
S
E
C
U
R
I
T
I
E
S
C
O
R
P
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
NE
W
H
A
M
P
S
H
I
R
E
-
R
E
F
-
A
12
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
4
$8
9
,
9
2
5
,
0
0
0
BA
N
K
O
F
A
M
E
R
I
C
A
M
E
R
R
I
L
L
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
S
a
l
e
s
>
$
2
5
M
f
o
r
t
h
e
w
e
e
k
o
f
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
8
,
2
0
1
4
Bl
u
e
=
P
r
i
c
e
d
t
o
C
a
l
l
D
a
t
e
RO
Y
=
R
e
o
f
f
e
r
Y
i
e
l
d
Re
o
f
f
e
r
Y
i
e
l
d
S
p
r
e
a
d
t
o
t
h
e
I
n
t
e
r
p
o
l
a
t
e
d
M
M
D
(F
u
l
l
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
D
e
t
a
i
l
s
f
o
r
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
w
e
e
k
’
s
s
a
l
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
a
c
c
o
m
p
a
n
y
i
n
g
f
i
l
e
)
19
XI
.
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
S
a
l
e
s
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
We
e
k
o
f
1
2
/
8
/
1
4
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
Se
r
i
e
s
:
Sa
l
e
D
a
t
e
:
Pa
r
A
m
o
u
n
t
:
Un
d
e
r
w
r
i
t
e
r
:
Ne
g
/
C
o
m
p
:
Ta
x
S
t
a
t
u
s
:
In
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
:
In
s
u
r
e
d
R
a
t
i
n
g
s
:
Un
d
e
r
l
y
i
n
g
R
a
t
i
n
g
s
:
Fi
r
s
t
C
a
l
l
D
a
t
e
:
Ma
t
u
r
i
t
y
Y
e
a
r
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2)ROY Spread(1)OAY Spread(2)
1
-6
.
0
-1
3
.
0
2
-4
.
0
-1
0
.
0
3
-3
.
0
-7
.
0
4
-2
.
0
-5
.
0
5.0
5
-1
.
0
0.
0
7.0
6
-2
.
0
2.
0
7.0
7
1.
0
8.
0
9.0
8
6.
0
16
.
0
16.0
9
7.
0
16
.
0
16.0
10
8.
0
16
.
0
19.0
11
9.
0
43
.
0
40
.
0
20.0
12
10
.
0
44
.
0
17
.
0
21.0
13
13
.
0
47
.
0
22
.
0
48.0
14
38
.
0
74
.
0
57
.
0
23.0
15
18
2
.
0
38
.
0
47
.
0
57
.
0
23.0
16
59
.
0
47
.
0
57
.
0
23.0
17
59
.
0
47
.
0
94
.
0
57
.
0
23.0
18
59
.
0
47
.
0
58
.
0
77
.
0
19
59
.
0
47
.
0
58
.
0
20
18
3
.
0
59
.
0
82
.
0
58
.
0
21
57
.
0
22 23
54
.
0
24 25
52
.
0
26 27 28 29 30
18
0
.
0
Aaa/AA+/NR 8/1/2024NA
Aa
2
/
A
A
+
/
N
R
8/
1
5
/
2
0
2
4
IN UNIV-W-2-REF 12/10/2014 $62,765,000 MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC NEGOTIATED Tax-Exempt
PS
F
-
G
T
D
Aa
a
/
A
A
A
/
N
R
NR
/
A
A
-
/
A
A
-
10
/
1
/
2
0
2
4
IR
V
I
N
G
T
X
I
S
D
-
R
E
F
12
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
4
$5
9
,
7
6
0
,
0
0
0
CI
T
I
G
R
O
U
P
G
L
O
B
A
L
M
K
T
S
I
N
C
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
Aa
2
/
A
A
-
/
N
R
12
/
1/
2
0
2
4
LA
L
O
C
A
L
G
O
V
T
E
N
V
R
N
12
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
4
$1
2
8
,
3
3
0
,
0
0
0
RA
Y
M
O
N
D
J
A
M
E
S
&
A
S
S
O
C
S
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
Aa
3
/
N
R
/
N
R
6/
1
5
/
2
0
2
4
LA
K
E
W
O
O
D
S
D
-
C
-
R
E
F
12
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
4
$3
7
,
3
5
5
,
0
0
0
RB
C
C
A
P
I
T
A
L
M
A
R
K
E
T
S
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
SC
H
B
D
G
T
Y
Aa
a
/
N
R
/
N
R
NR
/
B
B
B
/
B
B
B
-
12
/
1
/
2
0
2
4
LO
G
A
N
C
I
T
Y
S
D
B
O
E
12
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
4
$3
5
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
JP
M
O
R
G
A
N
S
E
C
U
R
I
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
CO
M
P
E
T
I
T
I
V
E
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
LO
M
A
L
I
N
D
A
U
N
I
V
M
E
D
I
C
A
L
C
N
T
R
12
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
4
$5
4
7
,
5
7
5
,
0
0
0
BA
N
K
O
F
A
M
E
R
I
C
A
M
E
R
R
I
L
L
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
S
a
l
e
s
>
$
2
5
M
f
o
r
t
h
e
w
e
e
k
o
f
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
8
,
2
0
1
4
Bl
u
e
=
P
r
i
c
e
d
t
o
C
a
l
l
D
a
t
e
RO
Y
=
R
e
o
f
f
e
r
Y
i
e
l
d
Re
o
f
f
e
r
Y
i
e
l
d
S
p
r
e
a
d
t
o
t
h
e
I
n
t
e
r
p
o
l
a
t
e
d
M
M
D
(F
u
l
l
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
D
e
t
a
i
l
s
f
o
r
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
w
e
e
k
’
s
s
a
l
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
a
c
c
o
m
p
a
n
y
i
n
g
f
i
l
e
)
20
XI
.
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
S
a
l
e
s
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
We
e
k
o
f
1
2
/
8
/
1
4
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
Se
r
i
e
s
:
Sa
l
e
D
a
t
e
:
Pa
r
A
m
o
u
n
t
:
Un
d
e
r
w
r
i
t
e
r
:
Ne
g
/
C
o
m
p
:
Ta
x
S
t
a
t
u
s
:
In
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
:
In
s
u
r
e
d
R
a
t
i
n
g
s
:
Un
d
e
r
l
y
i
n
g
R
a
t
i
n
g
s
:
Fi
r
s
t
C
a
l
l
D
a
t
e
:
Ma
t
u
r
i
t
y
Y
e
a
r
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2)ROY Spread(1)OAY Spread(2)
1
44
.
0
-2
.
0
3
0
.
0
-16.0
2
50
.
0
0.
0
4
0
.
0
9
.
0
-
1
6
.
0
3
55
.
0
3.
0
40
.
0
15
.
0
-10.0
4
65
.
0
33
.
0
5.
0
42
.
0
20
.
0
-7.0
5
70
.
0
34
.
0
7.
0
47
.
0
26
.
0
-1.0
6
76
.
0
41
.
0
7.
0
52
.
0
29
.
0
0.0
7
81
.
0
47
.
0
9.
0
59
.
0
37
.
0
6.0
8
89
.
0
41
.
0
16
.
0
70
.
0
46
.
0
14.0
9
10
0
.
0
53
.
0
16
.
0
72
.
0
52
.
0
17.0
10
10
5
.
0
58
.
0
19
.
0
75
.
0
58
.
0
20.0
11
11
1
.
0
63
.
0
20
.
0
78
.
0
64
.
0
22.0
12
11
6
.
0
66
.
0
21
.
0
80
.
0
80
.
0
24.0
13
12
1
.
0
71
.
0
48
.
0
81
.
0
88
.
0
24.0
14
12
1
.
0
86
.
0
48
.
0
81
.
0
93
.
0
23.0
15
12
1
.
0
86
.
0
53
.
0
81
.
0
93
.
0
21.0
16
11
7
.
0
86
.
0
53
.
0
19.0
17
11
6
.
0
89
.
0
53
.
0
65.0
18
11
6
.
0
89
.
0
58
.
0
65.0
19
11
6
.
0
89
.
0
58
.
0
65.0
20
11
6
.
0
89
.
0
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Aa1/AA+/NR 2/15/2024NA
A2
/
N
R
/
A
-
7/
1
/
2
0
2
5
DALLAS-REF 12/10/2014 $529,365,000 WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.NEGOTIATED Tax-Exempt
NA
NR
/
A
/
N
R
5/
1
/
2
0
2
5
EN
E
R
G
Y
N
O
R
T
H
W
E
S
T
-
R
E
F
12
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
4
$5
4
,
8
9
5
,
0
0
0
BA
N
K
O
F
A
M
E
R
I
C
A
M
E
R
R
I
L
L
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
Q-
S
B
L
F
NR
/
A
A
-
/
N
R
Aa
a
/
A
A
+
/
N
R
8/
1
/
2
0
2
4
FR
A
S
E
R
P
U
B
S
D
-
R
E
F
12
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
4
$4
6
,
9
2
5
,
0
0
0
S
T
I
F
E
L
N
I
C
O
L
A
U
S
&
C
O
I
N
C
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
A2
/
A
-
/
N
R
11
/
1
5
/
2
0
2
4
GR
E
E
N
B
O
N
D
S
-
I
N
U
N
I
V
-
W
-
1
12
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
4
$5
8
,
9
6
0
,
0
0
0
MO
R
G
A
N
S
T
A
N
L
E
Y
&
C
O
I
N
C
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
AG
M
NA
A3
/B
B
B
/
N
R
11
/
1
5
/
2
0
2
4
HA
R
R
I
S
C
N
H
O
U
S
T
O
N
-
A
12
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
4
$3
4
4
,
7
8
0
,
0
0
0
MO
R
G
A
N
S
T
A
N
L
E
Y
&
C
O
I
N
C
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
HA
R
R
I
S
C
N
-
H
O
U
S
T
O
N
-
C
12
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
4
$7
5
,
8
7
5
,
0
0
0
MO
R
G
A
N
S
T
A
N
L
E
Y
&
C
O
I
N
C
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
S
a
l
e
s
>
$
2
5
M
f
o
r
t
h
e
w
e
e
k
o
f
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
8
,
2
0
1
4
Bl
u
e
=
P
r
i
c
e
d
t
o
C
a
l
l
D
a
t
e
RO
Y
=
R
e
o
f
f
e
r
Y
i
e
l
d
Re
o
f
f
e
r
Y
i
e
l
d
S
p
r
e
a
d
t
o
t
h
e
I
n
t
e
r
p
o
l
a
t
e
d
M
M
D
(F
u
l
l
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
D
e
t
a
i
l
s
f
o
r
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
w
e
e
k
’
s
s
a
l
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
a
c
c
o
m
p
a
n
y
i
n
g
f
i
l
e
)
21
XI
.
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
S
a
l
e
s
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
We
e
k
o
f
1
2
/
8
/
1
4
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
Se
r
i
e
s
:
Sa
l
e
D
a
t
e
:
Pa
r
A
m
o
u
n
t
:
Un
d
e
r
w
r
i
t
e
r
:
Ne
g
/
C
o
m
p
:
Ta
x
S
t
a
t
u
s
:
In
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
:
In
s
u
r
e
d
R
a
t
i
n
g
s
:
Un
d
e
r
l
y
i
n
g
R
a
t
i
n
g
s
:
Fi
r
s
t
C
a
l
l
D
a
t
e
:
Ma
t
u
r
i
t
y
Y
e
a
r
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2)ROY Spread(1)OAY Spread(2)
1
11
.
0
-7
.
0
-
7
.
0
2
11
.
0
-7
.
0
-
7
.
0
3
14
.
0
-7
.
0
-7
.
0
4
17
.
0
-7
.
0
-7
.
0
5
-4
.
0
25
.
0
-6
.
0
-6
.
0
6
-7
.
0
-7
.
0
7
-3
.
0
-5
.
0
-5
.
0
8
-2
.
0
-2
.
0
9
3.
0
-2
.
0
-2
.
0
10
6.
0
49
.
0
-1
.
0
-1
.
0
11
9.
0
0.
0
0.
0
12
-3
.
3
1.
0
13
3.
0
3.
0
14
3.
0
3.
0
15
80
.
0
3.
0
3.
0
16
80
.
0
3.
0
3.
0
17
80
.
0
3.
0
3.
0
18
54
.
0
3.
0
3.
0
19
54
.
0
70
.
0
3.
0
3.
0
20
54
.
0
73
.
0
3.
0
21
55
.
0
72
.
0
2.
0
22
54
.
0
72
.
0
2.
0
23
54
.
0
74
.
0
2.
0
24 25
55
.
0
26
2.
0
27 28 29
56
.
0
2.
0
30
85.0B2/B+/NR Non-callableNA
Aa
a
/
A
A
A
/
A
A
A
8/
1
/
2
0
2
4
NEW YORK ST ENVRNMNTL 12/10/2014 $25,000,000 BANK OF AMERICA MERRILL PRIVATE PLACEMENT AMT
NA
Aa
a
/
A
A
A
/
A
A
A
8/
1
/
2
0
2
4
77
T
H
-
B
A
L
T
I
M
O
R
E
C
N
T
Y
12
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
4
$8
4
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
JP
M
O
R
G
A
N
S
E
C
U
R
I
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
CO
M
P
E
T
I
T
I
V
E
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
NR
/
A
A
+
/
N
R
2/
1
/
2
0
2
5
BA
L
T
I
M
O
R
E
C
N
T
Y
-
B
12
/
10
/
2
0
1
4
$1
1
6
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
JP
M
O
R
G
A
N
S
E
C
U
R
I
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
CO
M
P
E
T
I
T
I
V
E
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
S
D
C
R
E
D
P
R
O
G
NR
/
A
A
+
/
N
R
NA
4/
1
/
2
0
2
3
BL
O
O
M
I
N
G
T
O
N
S
D
#
2
7
1
-
B
12
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
4
$2
5
,
9
6
5
,
0
0
0
PI
P
E
R
J
A
F
F
R
A
Y
&
C
O
CO
M
P
E
T
I
T
I
V
E
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
S
T
A
I
D
W
I
T
H
H
L
D
G
NR
/
A
A
/
N
R
Aa
2
/
N
R
/
N
R
No
n
-
c
a
l
l
a
b
l
e
BO
Y
E
R
T
O
W
N
A
S
D
12
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
4
$3
0
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
RB
C
C
A
P
I
T
A
L
M
A
R
K
E
T
S
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
S
T
A
I
D
W
I
T
H
H
L
D
G
Aa
2
/
A
A
+
/
A
A
+
B
-
R
E
F
-
R
I
C
H
M
O
N
D
12
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
4
$2
5
,
6
0
5
,
0
0
0
ST
I
F
E
L
N
I
C
O
L
A
U
S
&
C
O
I
N
C
CO
M
P
E
T
I
T
I
V
E
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
S
a
l
e
s
>
$
2
5
M
f
o
r
t
h
e
w
e
e
k
o
f
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
8
,
2
0
1
4
Bl
u
e
=
P
r
i
c
e
d
t
o
C
a
l
l
D
a
t
e
RO
Y
=
R
e
o
f
f
e
r
Y
i
e
l
d
Re
o
f
f
e
r
Y
i
e
l
d
S
p
r
e
a
d
t
o
t
h
e
I
n
t
e
r
p
o
l
a
t
e
d
M
M
D
(F
u
l
l
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
D
e
t
a
i
l
s
f
o
r
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
w
e
e
k
’
s
s
a
l
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
a
c
c
o
m
p
a
n
y
i
n
g
f
i
l
e
)
22
XI
.
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
S
a
l
e
s
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
We
e
k
o
f
1
2
/
8
/
1
4
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
Se
r
i
e
s
:
Sa
l
e
D
a
t
e
:
Pa
r
A
m
o
u
n
t
:
Un
d
e
r
w
r
i
t
e
r
:
Ne
g
/
C
o
m
p
:
Ta
x
S
t
a
t
u
s
:
In
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
:
In
s
u
r
e
d
R
a
t
i
n
g
s
:
Un
d
e
r
l
y
i
n
g
R
a
t
i
n
g
s
:
Fi
r
s
t
C
a
l
l
D
a
t
e
:
Ma
t
u
r
i
t
y
Y
e
a
r
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2)ROY Spread(1)OAY Spread(2)
1
24
.
0
4
.
0
1
9
.
0
2
31
.
0
1
4
.
0
2
4
.
0
3
34
.
0
14
.
0
30
.
0
4
37
.
0
13
.
0
35
.
0
5
42
.
0
16
.
0
43
.
0
6
47
.
0
15
.
0
47
.
0
7
21
.
0
56
.
0
8
17
.
0
65
.
0
9
18
.
0
33
.
4
71
.
0
10
20
.
0
31
.
2
73
.
0
11
36
.
0
38
.
9
74
.
0
7.0
12
36
.
0
32
.
6
83
.
0
6.0
13
56
.
0
44
.
5
59
.
0
47
.
2
76
.
0
6.0
14
59
.
0
39
.
2
64
.
0
43
.
2
76
.
0
46
.
9
77
.
0
6.0
15
59
.
0
33
.
7
98
.
0
65
.
6
78
.
0
43
.
1
96
.
0
41.0
16
59
.
0
29
.
4
10
0
.
0
62
.
1
81
.
0
40
.
6
79
.
0
41.0
17
10
2
.
0
60
.
7
79
.
0
41.0
18
10
4
.
0
41.0
19
86
.
0
38
.
4
79
.
0
41.0
20 21 22
87
.
0
30
.
7
74
.
0
23 24
12
1
.
0
45
.
1
11
6
.
0
49.0
25
93
.
0
23
.
0
49.0
26
49.0
27 28 29
10
.
0
-1
2
.
4
30
11
6
.
0
36
.
0
Aa1/AAA/AA+7/1/2025NA
A1
/
N
R
/
N
R
6/
1
5
/
2
0
2
5
UPPER OCCOQUAN SWG 12/9/2014 $163,885,000 WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.COMPETITIVE Tax-Exempt
AG
M
Aa
3
/
A
A
/
N
R
Aa
3
/
A
A
-
/
A
A
-
11
/
1
/
2
0
2
2
UW
G
A
T
H
L
E
T
I
C
C
O
M
P
L
E
X
12
/
9
/
2
0
1
4
$2
7
,
6
6
0
,
0
0
0
WE
L
L
S
F
A
R
G
O
B
A
N
K
N
.
A
.
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
NR
/
A
A
+
/
N
R
12
/
1
/
2
0
2
4
WO
R
C
E
S
T
E
R
-
R
E
F
12
/
9
/
2
0
1
4
$5
9
,
4
8
9
,
0
8
0
FI
D
E
L
I
T
Y
C
A
P
I
T
A
L
M
A
R
K
E
T
S
CO
M
P
E
T
I
T
I
V
E
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
Aa
2
/
N
R
/
A
A
8/
1/
2
0
2
5
HO
F
F
M
A
N
E
S
T
A
T
E
S
P
K
D
T
12
/
9
/
2
0
1
4
$1
5
,
7
5
0
,
0
0
0
GE
O
R
G
E
K
.
B
A
U
M
&
C
O
M
P
A
N
Y
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
Aa
a
/
A
A
A
/
N
R
6/
1
/
2
0
2
4
OR
A
N
G
E
C
N
T
Y
F
L
S
C
H
B
R
12
/
9
/
2
0
1
4
$1
3
2
,
3
4
0
,
0
0
0
CI
T
I
G
R
O
U
P
G
L
O
B
A
L
M
K
T
S
I
N
C
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
MA
S
S
A
CH
U
S
E
T
T
S
T
R
A
N
S
-
A
12
/
9
/
2
0
1
4
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
MO
R
G
A
N
S
T
A
N
L
E
Y
CO
M
P
E
T
I
T
I
V
E
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
S
a
l
e
s
>
$
2
5
M
f
o
r
t
h
e
w
e
e
k
o
f
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
8
,
2
0
1
4
Bl
u
e
=
P
r
i
c
e
d
t
o
C
a
l
l
D
a
t
e
RO
Y
=
R
e
o
f
f
e
r
Y
i
e
l
d
Re
o
f
f
e
r
Y
i
e
l
d
S
p
r
e
a
d
t
o
t
h
e
I
n
t
e
r
p
o
l
a
t
e
d
M
M
D
(F
u
l
l
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
D
e
t
a
i
l
s
f
o
r
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
w
e
e
k
’
s
s
a
l
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
a
c
c
o
m
p
a
n
y
i
n
g
f
i
l
e
)
23
XI
.
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
S
a
l
e
s
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
We
e
k
o
f
1
2
/
8
/
1
4
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
Se
r
i
e
s
:
Sa
l
e
D
a
t
e
:
Pa
r
A
m
o
u
n
t
:
Un
d
e
r
w
r
i
t
e
r
:
Ne
g
/
C
o
m
p
:
Ta
x
S
t
a
t
u
s
:
In
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
:
In
s
u
r
e
d
R
a
t
i
n
g
s
:
Un
d
e
r
l
y
i
n
g
R
a
t
i
n
g
s
:
Fi
r
s
t
C
a
l
l
D
a
t
e
:
Ma
t
u
r
i
t
y
Y
e
a
r
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2)ROY Spread(1)OAY Spread(2)
1
8.
0
-4
.
0
1
2
.
0
1
.
0
2
10
.
0
-2
.
0
1
5
.
0
4
.
0
3
15
.
0
0.
0
13
.
0
7.0
4
20
.
0
42
.
0
1.
0
15
.
0
15.0
5
22
.
0
46
.
0
5.
0
17
.
0
31.0
6
28
.
0
51
.
0
5.
0
23
.
0
49.0
7
38
.
0
56
.
0
8.
0
32
.
0
57.0
8
45
.
0
67
.
0
12
.
0
38
.
0
68.0
9
50
.
0
67
.
0
13
.
0
46
.
0
68.0
10
60
.
0
68
.
0
14
.
0
51
.
0
76.0
11
70
.
0
70
.
0
14
.
0
56
.
0
12
79
.
0
71
.
0
14
.
0
55
.
0
13
77
.
8
71
.
0
34
.
0
51
.
0
55
.
0
14
84
.
0
71
.
0
78
.
1
61
.
0
59
.
0
91.0
15
84
.
0
71
.
0
89
.
2
66
.
0
59
.
0
16
84
.
0
89
.
8
66
.
0
57
.
0
17
84
.
0
91
.
1
66
.
0
91
.
0
18
84
.
0
84
.
0
66
.
0
19
84
.
0
96
.
7
66
.
0
96.0
20
84
.
0
96
.
6
21
85
.
0
84
.
0
22
87
.
0
10
6
.
0
23
89
.
0
84
.
0
96.0
24
91
.
0
84
.
0
25 26 27 28 29
94
.
0
-87.0
30
Aa2/NR/NR 7/1/2024NA
NR
/
A
/
N
R
8/
1
/
2
0
2
4
OREGON ST HSG & CMNTY 12/9/2014 $30,900,000 BANK OF AMERICA MERRILL NEGOTIATED Tax-Exempt
AG
M
NR
/
A
A
-
/
N
R
Aa
1
/
A
A
A
/
A
A
A
7/
1
/
2
0
2
5
SA
N
J
A
C
I
N
T
O
C
A
U
N
I
F
S
12
/
9
/
2
0
1
4
$4
0
,
2
3
5
,
0
0
0
ST
I
F
E
L
N
I
C
O
L
A
U
S
&
C
O
I
N
C
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
NR
/
A
A
+
/
N
R
12
/
1
/
2
0
2
4
S
C
O
T
T
S
D
A
L
E
M
U
N
I
P
R
O
P
12
/
9
/
2
0
1
4
$3
0
,
6
8
5
,
0
0
0
MO
R
G
A
N
S
T
A
N
L
E
Y
CO
M
P
E
T
I
T
I
V
E
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
NR
/
A
+
/
N
R
5/
1
/
2
0
2
5
SH
E
L
B
Y
C
N
-
R
E
F
-
W
T
S
12
/
9
/
2
0
1
4
$3
1
,
7
2
5
,
0
0
0
MO
R
G
A
N
S
T
A
N
L
E
Y
&
C
O
I
N
C
CO
M
P
E
T
I
T
I
V
E
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
Q-
S
B
L
F
NR
/
A
A
-
/
N
R
Aa
3
/
N
R
/
N
R
8/
1
/
2
0
2
2
TE
C
U
M
S
E
H
P
U
B
S
C
H
S
-
A
12
/
9
/
2
0
1
4
$2
5
,
1
1
0
,
0
0
0
FI
F
T
H
T
H
I
R
D
S
E
C
U
R
I
T
I
E
S
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
TO
P
E
K
A
U
T
I
L
-
A
-
R
E
F
12
/
9
/
2
0
1
4
$4
4
,
6
2
5
,
0
0
0
BA
N
K
O
F
A
M
E
R
I
C
A
M
E
R
R
I
L
L
CO
M
P
E
T
I
T
I
V
E
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
S
a
l
e
s
>
$
2
5
M
f
o
r
t
h
e
w
e
e
k
o
f
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
8
,
2
0
1
4
Bl
u
e
=
P
r
i
c
e
d
t
o
C
a
l
l
D
a
t
e
RO
Y
=
R
e
o
f
f
e
r
Y
i
e
l
d
Re
o
f
f
e
r
Y
i
e
l
d
S
p
r
e
a
d
t
o
t
h
e
I
n
t
e
r
p
o
l
a
t
e
d
M
M
D
(F
u
l
l
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
D
e
t
a
i
l
s
f
o
r
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
w
e
e
k
’
s
s
a
l
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
a
c
c
o
m
p
a
n
y
i
n
g
f
i
l
e
)
24
XI
.
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
S
a
l
e
s
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
We
e
k
o
f
1
2
/
8
/
1
4
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
Se
r
i
e
s
:
Sa
l
e
D
a
t
e
:
Pa
r
A
m
o
u
n
t
:
Un
d
e
r
w
r
i
t
e
r
:
Ne
g
/
C
o
m
p
:
Ta
x
S
t
a
t
u
s
:
In
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
:
In
s
u
r
e
d
R
a
t
i
n
g
s
:
Un
d
e
r
l
y
i
n
g
R
a
t
i
n
g
s
:
Fi
r
s
t
C
a
l
l
D
a
t
e
:
Ma
t
u
r
i
t
y
Y
e
a
r
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2)ROY Spread(1)OAY Spread(2)
1
-1
8
.
0
-
1
1
.
0
-
9
.
0
-
4
.
0
-
1
.
0
2
-1
3
.
0
-
1
1
.
0
-
4
.
0
-
4
.
0
4
.
0
3
-1
0
.
0
-5
.
0
0.
0
0.
0
9.
0
4
-5
.
0
-5
.
0
2.
0
8.
0
5
1.
0
1.
0
8.
0
12
.
0
1.0
6
2.
0
-1
.
0
9.
0
16
.
0
7.0
7
8.
0
7.
0
15
.
0
18.0
8
15
.
0
13
.
0
20
.
0
26.0
9
17
.
0
18
.
0
23
.
0
30.0
10
16
.
0
21
.
0
26
.
0
34.0
11
18
.
0
28
.
0
28
.
0
40.0
12
19
.
0
28
.
0
43.0
13
24
.
0
66
.
0
31
.
0
48.0
14
64
.
0
66
.
0
32
.
0
52.0
15
64
.
0
66
.
0
34
.
0
51.0
16
34
.
0
52.0
17
34
.
0
34
.
0
49.0
18
34
.
0
34
.
0
49.0
19
34
.
0
34
.
0
49.0
20 21 22 23 24
29
.
0
26
.
0
44.0
25 26
31
.
0
27 28 29
27
.
0
30
Aa3/AA-/AA 2/1/2025NA
Aa
2
/
A
A
+
/
A
A
+
No
n
-
c
a
l
l
a
b
l
e
E BATON ROUGE PARISH 12/9/2014 $205,435,000 JP MORGAN SECURITIES LLC NEGOTIATED Tax-Exempt
NA
Aa
2
/
A
+
/
N
R
5/
1
/
2
0
2
4
GI
L
B
E
R
T
P
U
B
F
A
C
M
U
N
I
12
/
9
/
2
0
1
4
$2
8
,
0
8
0
,
0
0
0
RB
C
C
A
P
I
T
A
L
M
A
R
K
E
T
S
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
ST
I
N
T
E
R
C
E
P
T
Aa
2/
A
A
/
N
R
Aa
2
/
A
+
/
N
R
5/
1
/
2
0
2
5
MA
S
S
S
T
C
O
L
L
E
G
E
(
G
R
E
E
N
B
O
N
D
S
)
12
/
9
/
2
0
1
4
$9
1
,
3
7
5
,
0
0
0
RA
Y
M
O
N
D
J
A
M
E
S
&
A
S
S
O
C
S
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
ST
I
N
T
E
R
C
E
P
T
Aa
2
/
A
A
/
N
R
Aa
1
/
A
A
/
N
R
2/
1
/
2
0
2
3
MA
S
S
A
CH
U
S
E
T
T
S
S
T
C
L
G
12
/
9
/
2
0
1
4
$3
6
,
1
1
0
,
0
0
0
RA
Y
M
O
N
D
J
A
M
E
S
&
A
S
S
O
C
S
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
S
D
C
R
E
D
P
R
O
G
Aa
1
/
A
A
+
/
N
R
Aa
1
/
A
A
/
A
A
2/
1
/
2
0
2
3
MI
N
N
E
A
P
O
L
I
S
S
D
#
1
-
B
12
/
9
/
2
0
1
4
$4
5
,
2
7
0
,
0
0
0
RO
B
E
R
T
W
.
B
A
I
R
D
&
C
O
I
N
C
CO
M
P
E
T
I
T
I
V
E
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
S
D
C
R
E
D
P
R
O
G
Aa
1
/
A
A
+
/
A
A
MI
N
N
E
A
P
O
L
I
S
S
D
#
1
-
D
12
/
9
/
2
0
1
4
$1
2
5
,
5
7
0
,
0
0
0
WE
L
L
S
F
A
R
G
O
B
A
N
K
N
.
A
.
CO
M
P
E
T
I
T
I
V
E
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
S
a
l
e
s
>
$
2
5
M
f
o
r
t
h
e
w
e
e
k
o
f
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
8
,
2
0
1
4
Bl
u
e
=
P
r
i
c
e
d
t
o
C
a
l
l
D
a
t
e
RO
Y
=
R
e
o
f
f
e
r
Y
i
e
l
d
Re
o
f
f
e
r
Y
i
e
l
d
S
p
r
e
a
d
t
o
t
h
e
I
n
t
e
r
p
o
l
a
t
e
d
M
M
D
(F
u
l
l
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
D
e
t
a
i
l
s
f
o
r
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
w
e
e
k
’
s
s
a
l
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
a
c
c
o
m
p
a
n
y
i
n
g
f
i
l
e
)
25
XI
.
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
S
a
l
e
s
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
We
e
k
o
f
1
2
/
8
/
1
4
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
Se
r
i
e
s
:
Sa
l
e
D
a
t
e
:
Pa
r
A
m
o
u
n
t
:
Un
d
e
r
w
r
i
t
e
r
:
Ne
g
/
C
o
m
p
:
Ta
x
S
t
a
t
u
s
:
In
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
:
In
s
u
r
e
d
R
a
t
i
n
g
s
:
Un
d
e
r
l
y
i
n
g
R
a
t
i
n
g
s
:
Fi
r
s
t
C
a
l
l
D
a
t
e
:
Ma
t
u
r
i
t
y
Y
e
a
r
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2)ROY Spread(1)OAY Spread(2)
1
16
.
0
-
1
4
.
0
2
19
.
0
-
6
.
0
3
22
.
0
-3
.
0
4
25
.
0
5.
0
5
24
.
0
11
.
0
41
.
0
6
29
.
0
14
.
0
41
.
0
7
37
.
0
22
.
0
8
44
.
0
28
.
0
9
48
.
0
33
.
0
10
52
.
0
36
.
0
11
33
.
0
85
.
0
43
.
0
12
36
.
0
84
.
0
42
.
0
13
39
.
0
84
.
0
66
.
0
14
75
.
0
84
.
0
66
.
0
15
79
.
0
84
.
0
66
.
0
16
83
.
4
84
.
0
71
.
0
17
86
.
3
84
.
0
71
.
0
18
88
.
2
84
.
0
71
.
0
19
87
.
8
84
.
0
71
.
0
20
91
.
4
71
.
0
21
92
.
2
57
.
0
72
.
0
22
96
.
4
78
.
9
23
10
2
.
5
59
.
0
80
.
6
24
10
2
.
5
86
.
8
25
10
2
.
4
60
.
0
90
.
0
26
10
2
.
2
27 28 29 30
82
.
0
A1/A+/NR 10/1/2024NA
Aa
3
/
A
A
/
A
A
-
10
/
1
/
2
0
1
9
BAY AREA TOLL AUTH 12/9/2014 $275,000,000 CITIGROUP GLOBAL MKTS INC NEGOTIATED Tax-Exempt
NA
Aa
3
/
A
A
/
A
A
-
10
/
1
/
2
0
2
0
BA
Y
A
R
E
A
T
O
L
L
A
U
T
H
-
D
12
/
9
/
2
0
1
4
$1
4
3
,
7
3
0
,
0
0
0
BA
N
K
O
F
A
M
E
R
I
C
A
M
E
R
R
I
L
L
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
NR
/
A
A
-
/
N
R
1/
1
5
/
2
0
2
4
BA
Y
A
R
E
A
T
O
L
L
A
U
T
H
-
E
12
/
9
/
2
0
1
4
$1
4
3
,
6
7
5
,
0
0
0
BA
N
K
O
F
A
M
E
R
I
C
A
M
E
R
R
I
L
L
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
SC
H
B
D
R
E
S
F
D
NR
/
A
A
-
/
N
R
NR
/
A
A
-
/
N
R
2/
1
5
/
2
0
2
3
B
O
U
N
D
B
R
O
O
K
B
O
E
12
/
9
/
2
0
1
4
$2
7
,
1
4
0
,
0
0
0
MO
R
G
A
N
S
T
A
N
L
E
Y
&
C
O
I
N
C
CO
M
P
E
T
I
T
I
V
E
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
ST
A
I
D
W
I
T
H
H
L
D
G
NR
/
A
A
-
/
N
R
Aa
3
/
N
R
/
N
R
5/
1
/
2
0
2
5
CH
E
L
T
E
N
H
A
M
T
W
P
P
A
S
C
H
12
/
9
/
2
0
1
4
$2
5
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
RB
C
C
A
P
I
T
A
L
M
A
R
K
E
T
S
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
CL
E
M
S
O
N
A
T
H
L
E
T
I
C
F
A
C
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
12
/
9
/
2
0
1
4
$3
0
,
6
9
5
,
0
0
0
WE
L
L
S
F
A
R
G
O
B
A
N
K
N
.
A
.
CO
M
P
E
T
I
T
I
V
E
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
S
a
l
e
s
>
$
2
5
M
f
o
r
t
h
e
w
e
e
k
o
f
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
8
,
2
0
1
4
Bl
u
e
=
P
r
i
c
e
d
t
o
C
a
l
l
D
a
t
e
RO
Y
=
R
e
o
f
f
e
r
Y
i
e
l
d
Re
o
f
f
e
r
Y
i
e
l
d
S
p
r
e
a
d
t
o
t
h
e
I
n
t
e
r
p
o
l
a
t
e
d
M
M
D
(F
u
l
l
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
D
e
t
a
i
l
s
f
o
r
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
w
e
e
k
’
s
s
a
l
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
a
c
c
o
m
p
a
n
y
i
n
g
f
i
l
e
)
26
XI
.
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
S
a
l
e
s
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
We
e
k
o
f
1
2
/
8
/
1
4
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
Se
r
i
e
s
:
Sa
l
e
D
a
t
e
:
Pa
r
A
m
o
u
n
t
:
Un
d
e
r
w
r
i
t
e
r
:
Ne
g
/
C
o
m
p
:
Ta
x
S
t
a
t
u
s
:
In
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
:
In
s
u
r
e
d
R
a
t
i
n
g
s
:
Un
d
e
r
l
y
i
n
g
R
a
t
i
n
g
s
:
Fi
r
s
t
C
a
l
l
D
a
t
e
:
Ma
t
u
r
i
t
y
Y
e
a
r
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2
)
RO
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(1
)
OA
Y
Sp
r
e
a
d
(2)ROY Spread(1)OAY Spread(2)
1
37
.
0
-1
.
0
-
1
.
0
2
52
.
0
2.
0
2
.
0
3
63
.
0
5.
0
5.
0
4
68
.
0
5.
0
8.
0
5
76
.
0
8.
0
12
.
0
6
82
.
0
6.
0
13
.
0
7
93
.
0
8.
0
15
.
0
8
10
5
.
0
38
.
0
39
.
0
19
.
0
9
11
1
.
0
38
.
0
38
.
3
29
.
6
280.5
10
11
5
.
0
41
.
0
42
.
0
31
.
0
11
11
8
.
0
12
7
.
7
14
.
0
24
.
7
43
.
0
12
11
8
.
0
11
3
.
9
83
.
0
77
.
7
24
.
0
25
.
3
67
.
0
13
12
2
.
0
10
2
.
2
85
.
0
68
.
1
29
.
0
22
.
1
71
.
0
14
12
2
.
0
91
.
7
87
.
0
60
.
4
29
.
0
17
.
2
74
.
1
15
12
2
.
0
81
.
0
89
.
0
53
.
2
29
.
0
12
.
3
72
.
4
16
89
.
0
47
.
9
42
.
0
17
.
9
64
.
0
17
89
.
0
42
.
8
29
.
0
7.
2
64
.
0
18
89
.
0
39
.
3
29
.
0
5.
7
64
.
0
19
87
.
0
35
.
0
54
.
0
17
.
1
64
.
0
252.0
20
86
.
0
32
.
1
54
.
0
15
.
7
21
13
9
.
0
70
.
7
22
29
.
0
0.
4
23 24
29
.
0
-1
.
3
25
81
.
0
20
.
6
26 27 28 29 30
13
7
.
0
49
.
2
81
.
0
13
.
8
240.5NA5/1/2024NA
Aa
2
/
N
R
/
N
R
9/
1
/
2
0
2
3
CELEBRATION PT CDD #1 12/8/2014 $33,730,000 CITIGROUP GLOBAL MKTS INC NEGOTIATED Tax-Exempt
NA
Aa
1
/
N
R
/
N
R
5/
1
/
2
0
1
9
DO
U
G
L
A
S
S
D
#
4
9
7
-
A
12
/
8
/
2
0
1
4
$3
6
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
WE
L
L
S
F
A
R
G
O
B
A
N
K
N
.
A
.
CO
M
P
E
T
I
T
I
V
E
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
A1
/
A
/
N
R
11
/
1
5
/
2
0
2
4
FA
R
G
O
-
F
-
R
E
F
&
I
M
P
T
12
/
8
/
2
0
1
4
$4
0
,
4
4
5
,
0
0
0
FT
N
F
I
N
C
A
P
I
T
A
L
M
A
R
K
E
T
S
CO
M
P
E
T
I
T
I
V
E
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
NA
NR
/
A/
N
R
1/
1
/
2
0
2
5
AU
S
T
I
N
A
R
P
T
S
Y
S
12
/
9
/
2
0
1
4
$2
4
4
,
4
9
5
,
0
0
0
CI
T
I
G
R
O
U
P
G
L
O
B
A
L
M
K
T
S
I
N
C
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
AM
T
NA
A1
/
A
+
/
N
R
10
/
1
/
2
0
1
9
PE
N
N
I
C
H
U
C
K
W
A
T
E
R
W
R
K
S
12
/
9
/
2
0
1
4
$4
1
,
8
8
5
,
0
0
0
TD
S
E
C
U
R
I
T
I
E
S
(
U
S
A
)
L
L
C
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
AM
T
NA
BA
T
A
-
S
-
5
12
/
9
/
2
0
1
4
$2
5
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
JP
M
O
R
G
A
N
S
E
C
U
R
I
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
NE
G
O
T
I
A
T
E
D
Ta
x
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
S
a
l
e
s
>
$
2
5
M
f
o
r
t
h
e
w
e
e
k
o
f
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
8
,
2
0
1
4
Bl
u
e
=
P
r
i
c
e
d
t
o
C
a
l
l
D
a
t
e
RO
Y
=
R
e
o
f
f
e
r
Y
i
e
l
d
Re
o
f
f
e
r
Y
i
e
l
d
S
p
r
e
a
d
t
o
t
h
e
I
n
t
e
r
p
o
l
a
t
e
d
M
M
D
(F
u
l
l
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
D
e
t
a
i
l
s
f
o
r
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
w
e
e
k
’
s
s
a
l
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
a
c
c
o
m
p
a
n
y
i
n
g
f
i
l
e
)
27