Loading...
_add-on a)1 Resolution No. Add-on item a) Sponsored by: Mayor Stoddard City Commission Meeting: 03-20-18 ------ 2 A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of South Miami, urging 3 the Miami Dade County Board of County Commissioners to deny the 4 proposal to extend the SR-836 "Kendall Parkway" project past the 2020 5 Urban Development Boundary and expressing concern over the County 6 Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources' position as the 7 applicant for this proposal. 8 WHEREAS, the Miami Dade County Urban Development Boundary (UDB) is a zoning tool 9 established in 1983 to protect the wetlands, agricultural land, and open space lying between the county's 10 urban core and the wetlands of Everglades National Park to the West as well as Biscayne National Park to 11 the East, and 12 WHEREAS, the expansion of urban development outside the current UDB boundary places strain 13 upon county fresh-water, ecological, agricultural, and fiscal resources, and 14 WHEREAS, county staff has not found any demonstrated need to extend the boundaries of the 15 2020 UDB at this time, and 16 WHEREAS, Miami Dade Expressway Authority (MDX) is currently pursuing county approval for a 17 proposal to extend the SR-836 outside of the 2020 UDB, and 18 WHEREAS, MDX itself acknowledges that the road in question would place developmental 19 pressure on the surrounding area, and 20 WHEREAS, the proposed road passes through areas outside the 2020 UDB that should not be 21 developed, including a large portion of the West Wellfield, thousands of acres of active farmland, and 22 Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) buffer zones designated by the South Florida Water 23 Management District (SFWMD), and 24 WHEREAS, Miami Dade County Commissioners have already rejected this proposal over concerns 25 about extension past the UDB on two separate occasions in 2017, and 26 WHEREAS, Mayor Gimenez and MDX continue to pursue approval of this project, and 27 WHEREAS, under the Mayor's direction the Miami-Dade County Department of Regulatory and 28 Economic Resources has submitted a proposal to amend the Comprehensive Development Master Plan 29 to allow for this project, and 30 WHEREAS, history has shown that County staff cannot evaluate a proproposal objectively if the 31 applicant is likewise a County agency, because both groups answer to the same boss. 32 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF 33 SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: 34 Section 1: The City Commission reccommends against allowing the Department of Regulatory 35 and Economic Resources, an internal County agency, to proceed as the applicant for the SR 836 extension Page 1 of 2 Add-on item a) Sponsored by: Mayor Stoddard City Commission Meeting: 03-20-18 1 proposal and asserts that the application should instead come from the Miami Dade Expressway authority 2 itself. 3 Section 2: The City Commission urges that any application to extend the SR-836 past the 2020 4 Urban Development Boundary be denied. 5 Section 3: The City Clerk is directed to distribute this Resolution to all local governments in Miami- 6 Dade County. 7 Section 4: Severability. If any section clause, sentence, or phrase of this resolution is for any 8 reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, the holding shall not affect 9 the validity of the remaining portions of this resolution. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Section 5: Effective Date. This resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this __ day of ______ , 2018. ATIEST: CITY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM, LANGUAGE, LEGALITY AND EXECUTION EXECUTION THEREOF CITY ATIORNEY Page 2 of 2 APPROVED: MAYOR COMMISSION VOTE: Mayor Stoddard: Vice Mayor Harris: Commissioner Welsh: Commissioner Liebman: Commissioner Gil: March 6, 2018 360 Hunl er Sireel , West Palm Beach, FL 33045 Con servalionConc epl sLLC @gmall .com 786 .543 .1926 Mayor Philip Stoddard and The South Miami City Commission 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, FL 33143 RE: Transit Oriented Inml Development Support Dear Honorable Mayor Stoddard and The South Miami City Commission, I am writing today to express my support for the redevelopment of the Shops at Sunset Place. This proposal constitutes an ideal example of the transit-oriented infill development which Miami's citizens and environment both desperately need . These benefits include the following but are not limited to: Preventing Urban Sprawl through Densijication Urban sprawl is a major issue affecting both quality oflife and quality of the environment in Miami Dade County. The county's topography makes large scale development unwise outside of an elevated central corridor known as the "Atlantic Coastal Ridge". The land lying outside the ridge is both highly flood-prone and ecologically sensitive . In 1983 Miami Dade County established the Urban Development Boundary, as a means of combatting urban sprawl into the low-lying periphery of the county and separating the urban core of Miami from the wetlands of the Everglades and Biscayne National Park. The UDB is far from a perfect aegis however. The line is subject to expansion by the Board of County Commissioners and must maintain the capacity to accommodate population growth. The University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business research show that Miami's population is likely to grow from 2.7 million today to approximately 3.2 million by 2040 . Those familiar with the c oncept of a "carrying capacity" i.e, the number of people that a region can support without environmental degradation may find this troubling and testify that we should seek to limit popUlation growth. Unfortunately, under current state law the establishment of such limits is not an option. 3.163.3177(1)(1)(3), Florida Statutes states that each municipal CDMP must accommodate medium population projections for at least a 10-year planning period . Miami Dade County's Comprehensive Development Master Plan exceeds this requirement , stating under Land Use provision LU-8F, that the county must maintain a total 15-year Countywide supply of residential capacity beyond the date of Evaluation and Appraisal Report adoption. Should the county analysts find insufficient supply within the UDB, the county will have to either expand the boundary or risk incurring a lawsuit brought by pro-development landowners outside the UDB. This project would significantly add to our supply within the UDB and would not necessarily put new cars on the road because of its close proximity to transit and walkability to services in South Miami . A win-win for South Miami economic benefits and the protection of the Everglades and Farmland. Weare mandated to allow for growth under state statue and so , this leaves us with only two options; we can grow in or up, or we can sprawl out. We must avoid the latter. There is no scenario for expanding the boundaries of the UDB that does not cut into valuable farmland , imperil fragile wetlands, pg .l 360 Hunte r Street , We st Palm Beach, Fl 33045 Con se rv at ionC onc eptsllC@gmail.co m 786 .543 .1926 reduce aquifer recharge and expose citizens to unwarranted flood risk. Instead, we must approve projects such as this one which increase residential capacity within the boundaries of the UDB. Encouraging the Development of More Robust Public Transit Infrastructure The development of an effective public transit system is critical to Miami's struggle for sustainability and mobility. Unchecked urban sprawl has resulted in abhorrent traffic conditions for Miami-Dade County residents, especially residents living on the county periphery that must drive downtown. Many residents of the county spend upwards of two hours in highly congested traffic each way going to and from work, reducing our collective quality oflife. The sheer number of cars on the road also presents a major source of carbon pollution, threatening to undermine Miami-Dade counties climate change remediation goals and exacerbate sea-level rise impacts. Our untenable traffic conditions also present an additional risk for sprawl. Those bolstering the upcoming proposal to extend the SR-836 well past the UDB into valuable farmland and wetlands often cite poor traffic conditions out west as an excuse to push their pro-sprawl agenda . Miami Dade County has long struggled with the implementation of robust public transit infrastructure. After years of languishing, Miami Dade County leadership has finally begun to take the idea of rail extension seriously once again . In 2016 the county unveiled a new plan that could finally revive the city's bid to implement effective public transit: The Strategic Miami Area Rapid Transit (SMART) plan. This plan would add 6 new rapid transit corridors throughout the county. Still, the implementation of this crucial program is far from assured, and the county's commitment to public transit is clearly lacking. Ridership on public transit has been falling steadily, and in 2017 Mayor Gimenez pushed to defund the program by $30 million and continues to push for changes to the SMART plan that would critically undermine it s effectivene ss. At the same time, th e dates for meeting crucial project deadlines continue to be pushed back. If we do not generate a true concerted push fo r public transit, w e may see a repeat of the failed promises of 200 2 and the ~ penny tax . This development would add essential residential capacity adjacent to a major public transit hub. The additional ridership that will generate will increase revenue for our public transit while simultaneously increasing support for the development of an expanded public transit system. The best way to ensure that the county makes the right decisions on transit is to increase the base of citizens who rely upon it. Thus, I urge the South Miami City Commission to approve this application and the attached resolution in opposition to the 836 expansion proposal outside the Urban Development Boundary. Sincerely, Laura Reynolds, Founding and Managing Member, Conservation Concepts LLC pg.2 1. APPLICANT APPLICATION REQUESTING AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN Miami-Dade County Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources 111 NW 1 st Street, 12th Floor Miami, Florida 33128-1972 (305) 375-2835 2. APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE Jack Osterholt, Deputy Mayor/Director Miami-Dade County Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources 111 NW 1 st Street, 29th Floor Miami, Florida 33128-1972 By: -~=rP'--..>,...'"'--tr-\:-7""----"'-'=-----Jan uary 2018 3. DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTED CHANGES Amend the Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP) Adopted 2020 and 2030 Land Use Plan map and Transportation Element to include the SR-8361D01phin Expressway southwest extension, from the SR-836 interchange at NW 137th Avenue to SW 136 Street, as follows: 1. Amend the LUP map to Include the SR-836/Dolphin Expressway southwest extension as an Expressway 2. Amend the Transportation Element map series in the Traffic Circulation Subelement and Mass Transit Subelement listed below to include the SR-836/Dolphin Expressway southwest extension, as illustrated in Exhibit B: a. Traffic Circulation Subelement i. Figure 1 -Planned Year 2030 Roadway Network ii. Figure 3 -Roadway Functional Classification 2030 iii. Figure 4 -Limited Access Roadway Facilities 2030 iv. Figure 5 -Planned Roadway Network Level Of Service (LOS) 2030 v. Figure 6 -Planned Non-Motorized Network 2030 vi. Figure 7 -Designated Hurricane Evacuation Route b. Mass Transit Subelement i. Figure 1 -Future Mass Transit System 2030 Metrobus Service Area and Rapid Transit Corridors ii. Figure 2 -Future Mass Transit System 2030 Rapid Transit Corridors iii. Figure 3 -Premium Transit Corridors 2030 The SR-836/Dolphin Expressway Southwest Extension is planned as a 6-lane expressway from its proposed connection to the existing SR-836 interchange at NW 137 Avenue extending southwestward to SW 8 Street at SW 157 Avenue and thereafter extending southward as a 4-lane expressway to connect to SW 136 Street (see Exhibit A-Location Map), having potential interchanges and park and ride facilities at: • SW 8th Street/Tamiami Trail • SW 40 th Street /Bird Road • SW 56th Street/Miller Drive • SW 88 th Street/Kendall Drive • SW 104th Street/Killian Parkway • SW 120th Street • SW 136th Street The Project is being planned as an approximate SOO-foot wide expressway corridor that would include provisions for mass transit and a greenway/trail for non-motorized travel. 4. REASONS FOR CHANGE The SR-836/Dolphin Expressway Southwest Extension ("Project") is proposed as an integral part of a complete outlook on mobility and transportation infrastructure and facilities serving the communities of Miami-Dade County. In particular, the Project is proposed in direct response to the growth and development within the western and southwest portions of the County to address the existing deficiencies in the capacity of the area's transportation network. The Project is included in the adopted Miami-Dade 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) as a Partially Funded project and to advance the Project ahead, inclusion within the County's Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP) is required and is proposed herein. The Project would be built and operated as a tolled facility by the Miami- Dade Expressway Authority (MDX). All MDX project development and environment (PD&E) studies, as well as all design and construction works are funded solely with toll revenues. MDX will continue the project development process in close coordination with all local, state and federal permitting agencies, including the USACE. The purposes of the SR-836/Dolphin Expressway Southwest Extension are: • Improve roadway system connectivity within Miami-Dade County • Improve access to and from major employment, education and commercial centers • Improve mobility for people and goods by providing additional north-south access to serve existing travel demand, • Promote public safety by improving hurricane/emergency evacuation clearance times • Provide for multi modal transportation including mass transit, bicycle and pedestrianism • Improve traffic conditions on arterial roads promoting counter-flow traffic patterns between the Homestead Extension of Florida's Turnpike (HEFT) and the SR-836 Southwest Extension project area In summary, the Project proposes enhanced connectivity and more roadway capacity between the predominantly residential suburbs of south and west Miami-Dade County and the rapidly developing job centers in northwest and central Miami-Dade County. The proposed toll-financed expressway facility would reduce congestion and travel times on many roadways, and aid during hurricane/emergency evacuations. The Project will include a new transit corridor and park and ride locations for future development, giving residents alternative means to travel from the south and west to the northwest and central parts of the County. This feature of the Project will build on the transit opportunities in the SMART Plan, now being implemented within and by the County. While the Project will be located outside the existing Urban Development Boundary (UDB) as depicted on the Adopted 2020 and 2030 Land Use Plan map, it is based on the two highest-ranked corridors in the Alternative Corridor Evaluation process and has been tailored to hew as closely as possible to the existing UDB. Of the 10 potential corridors evaluated during the Alternative Corridor Evaluation process, conducted by the MDX between years 2014 and 2017, the only corridor located primarily within the UDB ranked last on the basis of the significant number of properties (primarily residences) that it would impact, and that it would yield the least net user benefits for motorists. To implement the SR-8361D01phin Expressway Southwest Extension, a text and map amendment to the Miami-Dade County Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP) is required. These changes are justified by the following reasons: Transportation Demand and Capacity The existing roadway network does not efficiently serve the existing captive demand generated by the residential, commercial and business activity in south and west Miami- Dade County. Preliminary traffic analyses demonstrate that the Project would serve a demand that is saturating the available network capacity. The Project would enhance the travel conditions for residents, commuters, freight and commercial movement while providing operating speeds of up to 55 mph, potentially more than doubling the current travel speeds along the existing east-west and north-south arterials in the general area, which during peak hours currently travel below 25 mph with the lowest travel speed recorded at 11 mph. The Project would change travel patterns by providing multimodal opportunities for motorized and non-motorized modes, allowing for a more efficient use of the existing roadway capacity and a more balanced traffic flow. (Current travel times recorded in Corridor Evaluation Traffic Technical Memorandum dated February 2017 of the MDX SR 836/Dolphin Expressway Southwest Extension PD&E Study prepared by Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.) Improving System Linkage The Project would provide much needed capacity and system linkage to the transportation network in the southwestern portion of Miami-Dade County. The primary access to SR 836 and other expressways from the West Kendall area is provided by the Homestead Extension of the Florida Turnpike (HEFT) via SW 152nd Street, SW 120ih Street, SW 88t~ Street, and SW 40~h Street. Additional access to the regional expressway system is provided by SR 874 via SW 104th Street. The arterials that feed the limited expressway system are currently heavily congested. An additional north-south corridor would relieve the congestion experienced on the entire system. Moreover, the Project's southern terminus at SW 136 th Street will facilitate travel to other MDX facilities, specifically the SR 874/00n Shula through the new SR 874 Ramp Connector project at SW 128\0 Street that is currently under construction with associated improvements along SW 128i11 Street. Planning for Social Demands and Economic Development The Project will provide improved accessibility to major activity and employment centers including the Miami Executive Airport, Miami International Airport (MIA), the Doral Warehouse District, the Health District, the Downtown Central Business District (CBD) and Miami-Dade County's civic and cultural centers. In addition to these areas, the Project will also serve the major social and activity centers that include Dolphin and International Malls; educational institutions like Florida International University (FlU), and local major attractions such as Zoo Miami. An increase in travel speeds with a corresponding decrease in Vehicle Hours Traveled (VHT) will improve access to jobs and opportunities to shop, both in support of the local and regional economy. (VHT data obtained from the SR 836 Extension PD&E Study: Final 2050 Screenline Traffic Forecasting Summary, dated December 22, 2017.) Emphasizing Modal Interrelationships The Project will serve as a platform for transit providers to improve service and connectivity between transit and other planned transportation facilities including non-motorized facilities within Miami-Dade County. The Project proposes the inclusion of express lanes outfitted with technologies that facilitate the safe travel of automated vehicles, including mass transit vehicles, at high rates of speed (XT Lanes) for a seamless connection with the transit service being implemented as part of the current SR 836 reconstruction generally east of the Turnpike. Transit users would benefit from a higher level of transit services to be integrated into the expressway corridor. The proposed typical section for the Project also includes an envelope for future transit, protecting right of way earmarked to provide an additional transportation mode in this corridor at a later date. Coordination between the MDX and Miami-Dade County primarily through the Miami-Dade County Department of Transportation and Public Works (DTPW) that currently operates various transit technologies from express bus to rail, could provide/improve system linkages to areas underserved by the existing transit system. The potential to strategically locate a park and ride facility(s) to further facilitate transit service will be evaluated as part of the Project's future PD&E study, Additionally, the Project proposes incorporation of a multi- use recreational trail that may also serve as a buffer between developed areas and the expressway, while providing pedestrian/bicycle access to park and ride facilities and the County's Greenway System. The Project and Urban Development outside the UDB The project is a response to existing transportation capacity needs inside the 2020 Urban Development Boundary (UDB) and is not to serve as impetus for urban development or for expansion of the UDB. Accordingly, policy toward assuring this remains true will be developed and evaluated along with this application. Such policies might include, but are not limited to: ensuring that roadway Level of Service improvements that will result from the Project will not permit additional development beyond that which would be permitted if the Project is not built; maximizing the preservation of adjacent wetland resources as part of mitigation for the construction of the road, and/or; a potential development buffer along the length of the corridor. Description of the Project Alignment The proposed alignment for the Corridor covers approximately 780 acres and passes through the Sections, Townships and Ranges, as listed in Table 1 below. The proposed corridor extends a total of approximately 13 miles. It starts at the existing interchange of SR 836 and NW 137 th Avenue and follows the alignment described below: 1. From the existing SR 836 and NW 137th Avenue interchange goes south/west somehow parallel to SW 137th Avenue and SW 8th Street. This northern segment goes through the Sections, Townships and Ranges identified in the table with numbers one through three. 2. It continues parallel to SW 8th Street up to approximately SW 162 nd Avenue where it starts to turn south again and travels south parallel to SW 167th Avenue. This segment goes through the Section, Township and Ranges identified with numbers four through six. 1. After it turns it travels southbound parallel to SW 167 th Avenue up to approximately SW 72 nd Street. This segment goes through the Section, Township and Ranges identified with numbers six through nine. In this area, there is an alternate option for the alignment that instead traveling parallel to SW 167 th Street it traverses this area diagonally from SW 8th Street to SW 40 th Street The Sections, Townships and Ranges differ from the ones listed with the curved alignment. In this segment it traverses through the Section, Township and Ranges identified in the table with the numbers six and seven of the Alternate Alignment columns. 3. From SW 72 nd Street it starts to turn west and south becoming parallel to SW 172f1d Avenue up to SW 104th Street. I n this segment, the alignment goes through Section, Township and Ranges identified with numbers 10 through 11. 4. From SW 104th Street to north of SW 120th Street it traverses diagonally in a southeast direction approaching SW 162 nd Avenue. In this segment I traverses Section, Township and Ranges identified with numbers 12 through 13. 5. From SW 120th Street it continues south parallel to SW 162nd Avenue until it connects to SW 136ih Street. In this segment the alignment goes through Section, Township and Ranges identified with number 14. Table 1 -Sections-Townships-Ranges --~--- 39 5. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS SUBMITTED a. Exhibit A-Location Map b. Exhibit B-Transportation Element Maps Series c. Traffic Impact Study EXHIBIT A Location Map i "" : I NW 56TH 8T I L j-L: l I "t1 I -l I " \ I" NW25TH ST ._ .... 7\ ••• m ?~ 1 \ ';;0 • m 0 • ~ ~ --SR 836 EXT I'll ~ ~~ c..r ~ J ) I~ I'll \ "'-W FLAGLER ST 'I t--\ \ T SW 8TH 5T h n f-r~ '-r--I~ ~l ~-I[J) r-'~--co ~ I ~ SW24fH ST 0>_ r--I ..." v-S ... (,oJ !~ "" 1 -J :c ::I: ~ /r--...... .~ ~ 1 rn m 1 ILY /. sw 72NO sr ~tL r 0 rC@ ~.:-~PI C;Sf(87S_, ~~ J 1m r SW88TI-IST /. 1 V ... )/~ s!i \ J 1==:--1-- • (t---?L r----'l-r -J ~I~ ~\ l,~ "'-..... ~ sw 120TH ST \ ~i. I ~SW13.THST • t~, ~ . ~ :~ I'll ! __ , ___ n I I \ ,-'_.'''. :t --APPLICATION AREA •••• 2020 URBAN DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY -...... _. 2030 URBAN EXPANSION AREA -, L ill / 1 ~ ~rr / f--~~Il; (J) ~ f -~ ~rrtl -~ 0)/ ~152ND ST II \ ~W1~STY ~ -f~ r--- v ~vz)x Wi o 2,5 __ ==-_Miles N A EXHIBIT B Transportation Element Maps Series Amend the CDMP Transportation Element map series to include the SR-836/Dolphin Expressway southwest extension on the figures listed below of the Traffic Circulation Subelement and Mass Transit Subelement, as illustrated on the following figures, Traffic Circulation Subelement maps: • Figure 1 -Planned Year 2030 Roadway Network • Figure 3 -Roadway Functional Classification 2030 • Figure 4 -Limited Access Roadway Facilities 2030 • Figure 5 -Planned Roadway Network Level Of Service (LOS) 2030 • Figure 6 -Planned Non-Motorized Network 2030 • Figure 7 -Designated Hurricane Evacuation Route Mass Transit Subelement maps: • Figure 1 -Future Mass Transit System 2030 Metrobus Service Area and Rapid Transit Corridors • Figure 2 -Future Mass Transit System 2030 Rapid Transit Corridors • Figure 3 -Premium Transit Corridors 2030 BROI,.VARD COUNTY ---\1 ,~ --. ---~~~----~--- t,1IMil·DAOeCGU'TY 1'1 ,f o-$', -<:~ 'NATER CONS[RVATION ARE.A. S"N 392 D ST /' Figure 4 I \ t (' ~ LIMITED ACCESS ROADWAY FACILITIES 2030 1. Homestead Extension 01 I-Ionda Turn;J,ke (HEFT) 2 Florida Tur:lplke 3. I -75 4. I -95 S. SI, 826 G SR 112 7. I 195 8. SR ~36 9.1·395 ~O. SR 874 11. SR 878 12. Glsugny Parkway 13. Vlilliam Lehman COjUS8wuy 14 SR 112JSR 83G 15. N\I\r25 Street \/iadu::::1 16. Port of Miami Tunnsl 17. SR 836 SDulh'N€stExtension .. -I 2020 Urban Jeveloprmmt Boundar~' J / ... --, 2030 Urban Expansion Area INrORl\1J\TfON IS Bt,sa{ 6'11 THE M'.Ar.,,'I-OAJE CO~INTY LONG RANGE TR,o\NS;tORTATION PLAN 10 11E YEAR 2:::40At>;O 2018·2027 TR4,'~SIT D£:vELO?MENT PI AN MIAMI-PADE IHANSIT, DEPARTME:tH O~ ~EGUU,TORY At ... 0 FCOr-.;OM:9 .~~saLHCI:.S. 2017 2 4 6 __ -=::::JI_-==== ___ Mlles DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AND ECONOMIC RESOURCES, 2017 N ~ 1) WATER CONSERVATION AREA EVERGLADES NATIONAL PARK Figure 5 PLANNED ROADWAY NETWORK LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) 2030 LOS C OR BEDER LOSD LOS E LOSF --, 2020 URBAN DEV[LOPM ENT OOUNDARY •• --2030 URBAN EXPANSION AREA THIS MAP REPRESENTS THE GENERAUZED ROADWAY LOS OUTPUT, BASED ON PROJECTED AVERAGE DAILY VOLUMES, DERIVED FROM THE FLORIDA STANDARD URBAN TRANSPORTATION MODEL STRUCTURE (fSlITMS) USED TO DEVELOP THE MPO'S 2035 TRANSPORTATION PLAN, COST FEASIBLE PLAN, HIGHWAY NETWORK. A 10% PEAKING FACTOR WAS APPLIED TO ALL PROJECTED VOLUMES TO APPROXIMATE PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS. CAUTION MUST BE USEO VVHEN INTERPRETING INFORMATION SHOWN FOR INDIVIDUAL LINKS. LOS OUTPUT FROM THE FSUTMS MODEL IS INTENDED FOR SYSTEMWIDE PLANNING PURPOSE ONLY AND IS NOI COMPA'lIBLE WITH CONGESTION MANAGEME'NT EVALUATION METHODOLOGIES OR PROCEDURES NOTE: INFORMATION IS BASED ON THE MIAMI·DADE COUNTY LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PlI'.N TO THe YEAr< 2040 AND ~01B-2027 TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN SOURCE: MIAMI·DADE COUNTY TRANSIT, DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AND ECONOMIC RE.SOURCES, 2017 o 2 4 6 N :EP:TMENT OF RE::LATORY AND 1,. ECONOMIC RESOURCES, 2017 f BROl\O'.RDCOUN1Y MIAMI-DADE COUNTY WATER CONSERVATiON ARF.:A EVERGlADES NATIONAL PARK Figure 6 SWBTHST PLANNED NON-MOTORIZED NETWORK 2030 '-'-l/ / Existing Bike Lanes Existing Multi Use Lane Proposed Bicycle Facilities --Greenways Network ..... 2030 Urban Expansion Area --2020 Urban Development Boundary SOURCE: MIAMI-DADE DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AND ECO~OMIC RESOURCES, AND METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION, 2017 o N ~ DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AND l! ECONOMIC RESOURCES, 2017 jJ 9 n_-==lI __ ===:::::J ___ IIIIIIMI:e, 1.5 3 6 BRO\.I\ARD COUNTY M1AMj·DADE COUNTY W'\TER CONSERVAT!ON AREA rfI·· II II II • UI i' WPAL~ II II. ,)-~0~ Figure 7 DESIGNATED EVACUATION ROUTES 2030 MAJOR ROUTES -LINKAGES ... 1 2020 URBAN DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY ••• 12030 EXPANSION AREA BOUNDARY N,)TE" INFORMATIDN 13 BASED ON TflE MIAMi-DA.DE COliNTY LONG RANGe TRANSPORTATION PLAN TO THE YEAR 2040A"-lO MIA~J"DADE OFFlCE OF f:MEJI.GE:NCY MANAGEMf:NJ SOURCE MIAMI·DADe COUWY, DEPAR.TMCNT or REG'JLATORr AND ECONOMIC RESOURCES, 20'1 o 6 __ = .. _-==== ___ Miles DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AND ECONOMIC RESOURCES, 2017 N i MIAr>ll~DADE COUNTY IMTER CONSERVATION ARt:A .... Metro Rai! Stations Transit ClintgrS ~ Existing Rapid Transit Corridor Figure 1 FUTURE MASS TRANSIT SYSTEM 2030 METROBUS SERVICE AREA AND RAPID TRANSIT CORRIDORS ~ tii m m ~ Proposed Rapid Transit Corridor Existing Service Ama r==== ____ .J New! Enhanced Service Area ____ ._ 2020 Urban OevefopmentBoundary ....... __ ... 1 2030 Urban Expansion Area NOT~: INFOR~AT10N IS SAJE6 ON THE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY LONG RA'\lGE TRA.NSPORfAflON PLAN 10 THE YEI\R 2040AND 2018-?027 TRANSiT Dt:Vl!:lOPME:N r PI AN SOURCE: M!M1I·DADE COUNlY TRANSIT, DEPARTf.,1ENT OF REGULATORY A \JD ECONOM!C RESOURCES, 20fl' o 6 ._-=::::1-_===-__ Miles 2 4 N i DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AND 11\ ECONOMIC RESOURCES, 2017 IJ 1- 8ROWARD COUNTY 1-------.-..... ----,-",----~ MIAMI-DADE COUNTY WATER CONSERVAT!ON AREA Figure 2 swaT ST I I m I ~ .... , ffi , ~l t.f.A'" ~~ .... 'Ill h;-t-~ --r -. ... II II 1 ... ,..-, • .. I I • FUTURE MASS TRANSIT SYSTEM 2030 RAPID TRANSIT CORRIDORS Metro Rail Stations Transit Centers Existing Rapid Transit Corridor Proposed Rapid Transit Corridor 2030 Urban Expansion Area --_ .. 2020 Urban Development Boundary NOTE: INFORMATION IS BASED ON THS MIAMI· DADE COU,"TY LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN TO THE YEAR 2040 AND 2018·2027 TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN SOURCE' MlAM1~OADC COUNTI TRANSIT. DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AND ECOt-JOMIC RESOURCES. 201, o -1_5 3 6 9 N :ARTMENT OF REGULA:~:Y AND ~, ECONOMIC RESOURCES, 20n f • _____ ~B~R~O~~~R_.D_C_O~l_Jfrry_' _____________ . __ _+--------------_1~~-------" MIAMI-DADE COUNlY \"W\TER CONSERVATION AREA. swaTH, I 81, II I a.....- • Metro Rail Stations ... Transi: Stations ____ """"i!!lms"'w NW 7th Avenue Enhanced 8us NW 27th Avenue Enhanced Bus 295 Express Bus Palmetto Express Bus SR 836 Expres$ Enhanwd Bus Flagler Enhanced Bus 195 BC/195 SC Coral Way Limited Douglas Road Enhanced Bus Service Coral Re-ef Enhanced Bus Service sW 137th Avenue Enhancod Bus SefVjce Discayne Enhanced Bus 13 I<endall Drive (08th Slreel) 1I0lE' SOURCE SR 836 Southwest Extension £1<prcf>S Bus II.... ..... • 2020 Urban Development Boundary a _ ••• 1M ... 2030 Urban Expans!on Area IN~ORMATjON IS BASED ONTHE J~liM(DADE COUNTY LONG HANGi::: TRA.NSPORTAT!ON PLAN TO THE YEAR 2040AND 2018-2027 TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN MIAMi-DADE COUNTY TRANS1T, DEPARTM!::.NT OF REGULATORY AND ECONOM!C HESQURC:::S, 2017 // N Figure 3 0:.,.-=1 ::51!11 __ •3 ======6 ___ ... 9 Miles I PREMIUM TRANSIT CORRIDORS 2030 -DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AND ": RECOMMENDED SERVICE PLAN -NEW METROBUS ROUTES . ECONOMIC RESOURCES, 2017