Loading...
6611 SW 78 TERR_GREEN FINAL ZONING CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI BUILDING DEPARTMENT JOB LOCATION:, 6611 SW 78 TERRACE PERMIT : 08-0840 OWNER: 66 ESTATES LLC PHONE: PERMIT TYPE: BLDG-NEW CONSTRUCTION CLASS OF WORK: RESIDENTIAL-ADDITION OTHE CONTRACTOR: OWNER BUILDER PHONE: PROPOSED USE: NA WORK DESCRIPTION: addition of 2 bedrooms & 1 bathroom INSPECTION REQUIRED: OTHER INSPECTION INSPECTOR: ML DATE REQUESTED: 4/26111 DATE INSPECTED: _S-1 l ItBY o!`!L-----------------_---_---- APPROVED: _ REJECTED: ---- COMMENTS site: as aooroved on Dermit drawinas: is the resoonsibility of the contractor or owner/builder. CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI t BUILDTHG DEPARTMENT r JOB LOCATION: 66-II SW 78 TERRACE PERMIT ; 08-0840 OWNER: 66 ESTATES LLC PNOP#h,: PERMIT TYPE: BLDG-NEW CONSTRUCTION `.... i CLASS OF WORK: RESIDENTIAL-ADDITION OTHE "CONTRACTOR: OWNER BUILDER PHONE; ;, PROPOSED USE; NA WORK DESCRIPTION: addition of 2 bedrooms I hathrou INSPECTION REQUIRED: OTHER INSPECTION INSPECTOR: ##L DATE REQURSTED: 4(26191 DATE INSPECTED: �3� II ' �. . ...Bk w._...........��.___._. . _. .._..__ .__..._.._ APPROVED: � REJECTED; COMMENTS f.j.nal arming Location of wuk on site: as approved on permit drawings; is the responsibility of. t he contractor ax owner/builder. BP501UO2 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 5/_03/11 Inspection Results Entry 13:51 : 58 Application number, type 08 00000840 RESIDENTIAL-ADDITION OTHER THAN GAR Structure, permit . . 000 000 BPN 00 Inspection type, sequence : B10 0003 OTHER INSPECTION Property address . . . . . 6611 SW 78 TERRACE Request date, time, by 4/26/11 17 : 00 LO Type information, press Enter. Inspector ID (F4) . ML Results date . . . . . . . . . . 50311 Results status (F4) . . . . . . AP Final insp flag (F4) N j Edit comments . . . . . . . Y Y=Yes Display inspection penalties _ Y=Yes Point value . . . . . . . . . . F3=Exit F4=Prompt F7=Request comments F9=Standard comments F12=Cancel BP006U01 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 5/03/11 Edit Narrative 13 : 53 : 12 Atplication number, type 08 00000840 RESIDENTIAL-ADDITION OTHER T Property address . . . . . . 6611 SW 78 TERRACE Type information, press Enter. FINAL ZONING INSPECTION APPROVED AS PER ERPB CONDITIONS FROM APRIL 5, 2011 MEETING. APPLICANT MOVED PALM TREE SO THAT IT OBSCURES VIEW OF SECOND STORY WINDOW. T S: 05/03/2011 01 : 53 PM MLIGHTFOOT -------------------- More. . . F3=Exit F5=Copy F6=Insert F7=Delete 'F8=Time stamp F12=Cancel F21=User defaults { CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI BUILDING DEPARTMENT JOB LOCATION: 6611 SW 78 TERRACE PERMIT ¢; 0•8"-0840 OWNER: 66 ESTATES LLC PHONE: PERMIT TYPE: BLDG-NEW CONSTRUCTION CLASS OR WORK: RESIDENTIAL-ADDITION OTHE CONTRACTOR, OWNER BUILDER PHONE: PROPOSED USE: NA WORK DEG:CRIPTION: additioD of i bedroon-us °: 1 bathroom INSPECTION REQUIRED: OTHER INSPECTION INSPECTOR: ML DATE REQUESTED: 2!02111 DATE INSPECTED: . _2���11.-BY _ MWL - ---__--_-----_-_- -_-- APPROVED: - ._ REJECTED: . X COjRffE11",D final zoninia Location of work on site; as approved on permit drawings; is the responsibility of the contractor or owner/builder. CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI BUILDING DEPARTMENT JOB LOCATION; 661.1 SW 78 TERRACE PERMIT #: N-0840 (}MINER: 66-ESTATES LLC PHONE, f f PERMIT TYPE: BLDG-NEW CONSTRUCTION CLASS OR WORK: RESIDENTIAL-ADDITION OTHE CONTRACTOR: OWNER BUILDER PHONE: PROPOSED I18E: NA .WORK DESCRIPTION- addit.lon bedrooms � t bathroom INSPECTION REQUIRED: OTHER INSPECTION INSPECTOR: ML DATE REQUESTED: 2!02 11 , DATE INSPECTED: ZI� �1I BY._'_ . M W L" _..._ _ APPROVED: REJECTED: COMMENTS final zoning Location of work on site; as approved on permit drawings; is the responsibility of the contractor or owner/builder. BP5Q1UO2 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2/04/11 Inspection Results Entry 11 : 36: 38 Application number, type . 08 00000840 RESIDENTIAL-ADDITION OTHER THAN GAR Structure, permit . . . 000 000 BPN 00 Inspection type, sequence : B10 0002 OTHER INSPECTION Property address . . . . . 6611 SW 78 TERRACE Request date, time, by . . 2/02/11 17 : 00 LO Type information, press Enter. Inspector ID (F4) . . . . . . . ML Results date . . . . . . . . 20411 Results status (F4) . . . DA Final insp - flag (F4) . . ' . . . N Edit comments . . . . . . . . Y Y=Yes Display inspection penalties . . _ Y=Yes Point value . . . . . . . . F3=Exit F4=Prompt F7=Request comments F9=Standard comments F12=Cancel BP0Q6U01 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 2/04/11 Edit Narrative 11: 39: 49 Application number, type . . 08 00000840 RESIDENTIAL-ADDITION OTHER T Property address . . . . . . . 6611 SW 78 TERRACE Type information, press Enter. FINAL ZONING INSPECTION DISAPPROVED. .INSPECTION DISAPPROVED BECAUSE APPLICANT DID NOT FOLLOW CONDITIONS OF MOTION FOR APPROVAL THAT WAS GRANTED BY ERPB ON JANUARY 4, 2011 TO PLANT THREE (3) EIGHTEEN (18) FOOT GUMBO LIMBO TREES ALONG THE SIDE OF THE RESIDENCE. APPLICANT PLANTED THREE (3) . EIGHTEEN (18) FOOT PALM TREES IN PLACE OF THE GUMBO LIMBO TREES. T S: 02/04/2011 11 : 39 AM MLIGHTFOOT --------------------- More. . . F3=Exit F5=Copy F6=Insert F7=Delete F8=Time stamp F12=Cancel F21=User defaults t Mr. Balli questioned if the signage will be the entire length of the wall. The.applicant responded yes. Mr. Lightfoot commented that the flat sign complies with the Land Development Code and the black background will be another application. Mrs. Cabrera-Hernandez replied that the exterior upgrade will be handled by a different contractor. Mr. Jude recommended that the exterior be colored black when it comes back to the Board. Mr. Balli questioned if the last bay of the building is a separate store and should the last.bay be colored black. Mrs. Cabrera-Hernandez replied yes and will be considered part of the exterior renovation. Mrs. Mark commented that the-Board is reviewing the signage for the building, not the exterior renovation. Mrs. Mark questioned if the hanging sign will be composed of LED lights. Mr. Balli responded that there is a power source next to the signage. Mrs. Mark recommended that the LED lighting does not include any visible electrical connection. Mr. Balli commented that the wiring could be placed inside the tubing so that it is not visible. Mr. Chandler questioned if the owner agrees with the Board on making the signage smaller. The applicant responded that the owner is not present and would not know his-response. Mr. Chandler opened for Public Hearing. No discussion Mr. Chandler closed the Public Hearing. Motion: Mrs. Mark moved to approve the application with the condition that signage return to the Board if the elevation is different from what was provided as reference and if the electric wiring of the hanging sign is visible. Also, the size of the hanging sign is reduced so that it complies with the Land Development Code. Mr. Jude seconded: Vote: 4 Approved 0 Opposed 2) [ERPB-10-073] Applicant: Rene Busiter Property Owner: 66 Estates LLC For: Rene Busiter Location: 6611 SW 78 Terrace Request: New Construction: Revision Applicant Present: Mr. Rene Busiter Mr. Lightfoot read the item into the record. Mrs. Mark questioned if Staff had a copy of the revised landscape plan. Mr. Lightfoot responded that it is on file. Mr. Chandler questioned if the applicant needed to add just three trees. Mr. Lightfoot replied that the applicant could add the three or replace the current trees. ERPB Mins 1-4-2011 Pg2of7 Mr. Chandler questioned if the purpose of the trees was to block the view of neighboring properties. Mr. Lightfoot responded by reading the section of the LDC in regards to Landscape requirements. _ Mr. Chandler questioned if the applicant was going to remove the trees. The applicant responded that he would rather replant the trees. Mrs. Mark commented that the plans show that the view is blocked in order to provide privacy for the neighboring property. By substituting, the trees with 18' high palms the neighborhood privacy is not resolved. Mrs. Cabrera-Hernandez commented in order to be consistent the applicant would have to plant Gumbo Limbo trees and with staff's condition of three trees 18' high. Mr. Chandler commented that there are Gumbo Limbo plants and where would the applicant like them to go. Mr. Chandler questioned if the palms would be replaced by Gumbo Limbo or re- located. The applicant responded replace and keep them in the same place. Mrs. Mark questioned if the Gumbo Limbos would be placed for privacy purposes. The applicant responded that the property owners to the west can not see the property so it is not an issue of privacy. Mrs. Cabrera-Hernandez commented that the addition that came before the Board indicates that there is a hedge adjacent to the wall of the Gumbo Limbo, which is consistent with the permit set. Mr.-Chandler opened for Public Hearing. No discussion Mr. Chandler closed the Public Hearing. Motion: Mr. Chandler moved to approve the application with the change that the three 12 foot tall Palms that are against the side two-story addition be replaced with 18' Gumbo Limbo trees, which were approved on sheet L-1 in the permit set and any other changes are also approved. Mrs. Mark seconded. Vote: 4 Approved 0 Opposed ERPB Mins 1-4-2011 Pg 3 of 7 s CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI BUILDING DEPARTMENT JOB LOCATION: 6611 SW 78 TERRACE PERMIT #: 08-0840 OWNER: 66 ESTATES LLC PHONE: PERMIT TYPE: BLDG-NEW CONSTRUCTION CLASS OF WORK: RESIDENTIAL-ADDITION OTHE CONTRACTOR: OWNER BUILDER PHONE: PROPOSED USE: NA WORE DESCRIPTION: addition of 2 bedrooms 1 bathroom INSPECTION REQUIRED: OTHER INSPECTION INSPECTOR: ML DATE REQUESTED: 12;03/10 0 DATE INSPECTED: to 1 �to BYI°-- --- ----- - -- APPROVED: REJECTED: _O COMMENTS final zoning, Location of work on site; as approved on permit drawings; is the responsibility of the contractor or owner/builder, :-40 1 el"- CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI BUILDING DEPARTMENT JOB LOCATION: 6611; SW 78 TERRACE PERMIT N; 08-0840 OWNER: 66 ESTATES LLC PHONE: PERMIT TYPE: BLDG-IIEW CONSTRUCTION CLASS OF WORE: RESIDRNTIAL-ADDITION OTHE CONTRACTOR: OWNER BUILDER PHONE: - �, PROPOSED IISE: NA WORK DESCRIPTION: addition of 2 bedrooms & I. bathroom INSPECTION REQUIRED: OTHER .INSPECTION INSPECTOR: NL DATE REQUESTED: 12,/"03110 DATE INSPECTED: � f.I D._..By...._.._.MwL...._...-.--- _..._......-.__....-. APPROVED: _..._--- REJECTED: .--,_--- COMMENTS final. zoning Location of work on site; as approved on permit drawings; is the responsibility of the contractor or owner/builder, B2501UO2 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 12/21/10 Inspection Results Entry 10 : 19: 15 Application number, type 08 00000840 RESIDENTIAL-ADDITION OTHER THAN GAR Structure, permit . . . . . 000 000 BPN 00 Inspection type, sequence : B10 0001 OTHER INSPECTION Property address . . . . . 6611 SW 78 TERRACE Request date, time, by 12/03/10 17 : 00 LO Type information, press Enter. Inspector ID (F4) . . . . . ML Results date . . . . . . . . . . 122110 Results status (F4) . . . . . DA Final insp - flag (F4) . . . . . N Edit comments . . . . . . . . . Y Y=Yes Display inspection penalties . . Y=Yes Point value . . . . . . . . . _ F3=Exit F4=.Prompt F7=Request comments F9=Standard comments F12=Cancel BPO'06UO1 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 12/21/10 Edit Narrative 10 : 22 : 34 Application number, type 08 00000840 RESIDENTIAL-ADDITION OTHER T Property address . . . . . . . 6611 SW 78 TERRACE Type information, press Enter. FINAL ZONING INSPECTION DISAPPROVED. APPLICANT REMOVED LANDSCAPING THAT WAS EXISTING ON PROPERTY WITHOUT A TREE REMOVAL PERMIT. APPLICANT ALSO DID NOT INSTALL LANDSCAPING THAT WAS 18 FEET HIGH MINIMUM. APPLICANT ALSO REVISED HOUSE WITHOUT FIRST GETTING APPROVED BY ERPB. APPLICANT MUST PRESENT REVISIONS TO ERPB FOR APPROVAL INSTALL LANDSCAPING THAT COMPLIES WITH SECITON 20-3 . 5 (H) (C) (7) OF LDC, AND APPLY FOR TREE REMOVAL PERMIT TO REMOVE LANDSCAPING. T S : 12/21/2010 10 : 22 AM MLIGHTFOOT -------------------- More. . . F3=Exit F5=Copy F6=Insert F7=Delete F8=Time stamp F12=Cancel F21=User defaults ti �S i aa ti F - nn. \i tz P t�E1r_d t yro a i It dill L i 0.1 P 6 ei l wo � ra . f "35. .,3 4��,'� 1,,A➢ 1 � .Y 8. - V� r r ' i re Al 4r h - xzx�� .. /03/2011 a 1 YI S� 1 '!Mil 8/2010 �I C �. r 1 � t � 4 �tlil 12/08/2010 ��•�;. •1 �.J��. 1� �� ��:. ;, a���� Tea. .47 y Iva 7; -\i A W 12/08/2010 /* �, 'fit �''•.,, a:_ �, ,, ,� , ,�, /may I AM 12/08/2010 1•�s F � S1 Akr S rr H 12/08 c° F r � 'l. ' 1 Y i - N N, 0 00 ilk O vx Wit O a ✓ r• N --, O 00 f. N O •tom-..x E' +• •;. ' 4 � ' as- �. e 'N d� i :• 'uht� rr co vi �i r, • Y ti� °j. • tv de ai Y - 'ac ">••,err - ,..�: �p?' 7...r, ,.. �f � � ty ,� 1, ,� /A`M: t �_- � � •`fit = ._ �'�°.i4_ ;tl �• .y •r,v c. 1 y .. r s r 1Claii `I' w4 _ i ra }I 46A y.A, a�►��r ,�* 6 k -,�,,:F `� 6R ; ♦ Via.< I ,4 T �` � vo%t.n1`tc�'' rip.�.Y Y '�►a.ri SS`` nil r .i • +� � '� � t1. i'i'i '' i1 >V`l=, /,:..ry,i �1:.: � .v�1� c d�Y y AA +� !?fit 1�yyy� A` y �,. Jt"���., - �ti YE��„� k • ��t•;�: ir. yt _ ltiY. -5f �:� � i ���� \f �•y' }?,fit.. '4 r ,p3".11-Ml. Orr xz ol 441 oil ; NOs t r �4,' Y" : � 12 17 01 ' 1 �1,4 4/„I ✓ ! L •,ir s: I�_ rtrt II y ,i a Lt A .a1 s ti. \ � ' + ! �'' t� `S� �� � I(► �fit��. 'RANI •\ � ' i `l' 6 ',,a.�1+ iiA 4�rW ..lt/r�_�a�j�y#1� ��` .'. il�'' �' - 5- ;Aal' 12/17/2010 kA PI ,.' ' ♦t`i• 7 '.1. n. . J�' e 2/17/2010 r 4 r - 7 I �s - 1 17 ti }y -- - SIR" - r y • . w f r On s. j ci; -AL .M � vs ` Wit, - •'�. _ / ".� ,i' 2 or rA y� , =k��i� � '+4�,�•4+s-0h• �rayy w C 4 _•'i�tit n.:.�f -r X `��1,�� i '"3.r y .rs 1'7e / - -� _ �/vim r_ s __'� y F, '' � tw�`�y).s"�•., pie - •' _w 1 '�k<. �.; ;r- i�r��+. �«- ,�' •Q Yr;�. y '_�-'i_ '� �; ';�Ri� _ 'iii. 7.�_ a�� •+� r' �• `� s.t'- •� �` +� .+x"''.1..9 t _ Z' , h • ,� • pit ' '� ` o,t ., y �, l rs - J f 1 v 'y :✓• IV E'er, l� ��_ ,sue ' � �� 4Q �\ ;`11 a I \ r 1 i- 11 eN lip I