The URL can be used to link to this page

6550-6570 6600-6630 SW 77 TERR_PB-64-09 CITY OF .SOUTH MIAMI ADVISORY PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING HEARING NO. 64 - Q9 DATE: February 25, 1964 TIME: 8:00 P.M. APPLICANT: CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI REQUEST: INITIAL ZONING OF PARCELS #3 & #4 - annexed land SUBJECT PROPERTY: PARCEL 3 GRISBY MANOR 58/57 Lots 1 thru 5 & A,B,C PARCEL 4 DAVIS MANOR 51/41 Lots 1,2,3 Block 4 LOCATION: PARCEL 3 E of SW 67 Avenue along S side of SW 77 Terrace- one lot deep PARCEL 4 E of SW 67 Avenue between SW 79 Street & SW 80 Street ZONING WHEN COUNTY OWNED; PARCEL 3 All RU-1 PARCEL 4 Lot 1 - RU-5 Lots 2,3 - RU-1 PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD IN THE CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 6130 SUNSET,yDRIVE SOUTH MIAMI FLORIDA, ON THE ABOVE DATE.' ALL INTERESTED PARTIES ARE URGED TO ATTEND THE MEETING. OBJECTIONS OR APPROVAL MAY BE MADE IN PERSON AT THE HEARING OR FILED IN WRITING PRIOR TO THE HEARING DATE GAING NUMBER OF HEARING. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT SAME BE MAILED AT LEAST THREE DAYS (EXCLUDING SATUR- DAYS AND SUNDAYS) BEFORE THE HEARING DATE. THE BOARD RESERVES THE RIGHT TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL WHATEVER THE BOARD CONSIDERS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE AREA INVOLVED. THE BOARDIS DECISION WILL BE POSTED ON THE BULLETIN BOARD IN THE CFFICE OF THE BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT; IN ADDITION, INTERESTED PARTIES MAY CALL THE CITY ZONING INSPECTOR'S OFFICE FOR THE BOARD'S DECISION - MO 7-5691: REFER TO HEARING NUMBER WHEN MAKING INQUIRY. AN APPEAL OF THE BOARD'S RECOMMENDATION MAY BE MADE TO THE CITY COUNCIL AT THE COUNCIL MEETING THE WEEK FOLLOWING BOARD MEETING. THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARDIS RECOMMENDATION ON THIS. MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR ACTION IN THE CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 6130 SUNSET DRIVE, SOUTH MIAMI FLORIDA JACK STANTON, CHAIRMAN CITY OF SOUTH- MIAMI - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD UNDER THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, THE BOARD CONSISTS OF ELEVEN APPOINTED MEMBERS INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN AND VICE-CHAIRMAN. ALL MEETINGS OF THE BOARD SHALL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, AND SIX MEMBERS - - SHALL CONSTITUTE A QUORUM, UNDER SEC. 20-53, ALL HEARINGS ON APPLICATIONS SHALL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC BUT VOTING SHALL BE DONE IN PRIVATE EXECUTIVE SESSION, PROVIDED THE MINUTES OF THE SESSION SHOW THE DECISION OF THE BOARD. A MAJORITY VOTE OF THIS BOARD SHALL BE REQUIRED ON ALL RECOMMENDATIONS MADE TO THE CITY COUNCIL. ... PERMITS, CERTIFICATES OF USE NO PERMITS OR CERTIFICATES OF USE AND OCCUPANCY AND OCCUPANCY WILL BE ISSUED UNTIL A FINAL DISPOSITION HAS BEEN MADE . ON THE ENTIRE APPLICATION BY THE CITY COUNCIL. PROCEDURE FROM TIME OF INITIAL APPLICATION, PROCEDURE TAKES APPROXIMATELY 30 DAYS. SIGNS ARE POSTED FOR A MINIMUM OF 15 DAYS ON.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, AND NOTICES ARE MAILED - OUT TO PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN A MINIMUM 3001 RADIUS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. Y =1 __p I METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY FLORIDA 302 Justice Building PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1351 N. W. 12 Street. February 18, 1964 Miami, Florida 33125 Telephone 377-7921, Planning and Zoning Board City of South Miami City Hall 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, Florida Attention Mr. Richard K. Barton, City Manager Gentlemen: This is- in reply to a notice of public hearing which the Metropolitan Dade County Planning Department has received from your Board concerning the initial zoning of areas .known as Parcels #3 and #4 which were recently annexed by the City of South Miami". We wish to thank, you for the opportunity to comment on these matters which are scheduled to be heard on the 25th of this month. We. respect- fully submit the following remarks: Parcel No. 3 was zoned RU-1 when it was in the unincorporated area. It contains several attractive single family homes and is surrounded by single family uses on all sides. We recommend that it be zoned RU-1. Parcel No. 4 was zoned RU-1 and RU-5 when it was in the unincorporated area. Since a professional office building now occupies the.RU-5 portion of the parcel, it is logical to retain that classification. Because of the solidly single family residential character of the areas to the , north and west, we think the vacant portion of Parcel No. 4 should be zoned RU-1 to insure development in keeping with those uses. While it is true that the commercial uses on the south side of 80th Street and the professional offices east of the vacant lots might possibly justify arr RU-2 classification, we believe the greater responsibility is to the adjacent home owners and we, therefore, recommend RU-1 zoning for the vacant portion of Parcel No. 4. Thank you again for notifying us of the public hearing and for permitting this department to submit its comments. Sin ely you s, Roscoe H. Jo , Director RHJ:WC/jl cc: Mr. R. F. Cook, Director Dade County Building and Zoning Department METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY • FLORIDA ROOM 701 BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT 1351 N. W 12TH STREET MIAMI 35, FLORIDA FRANKLIN 7-6911 February 20, 1964 Planning & Zoning Board City of South Miami 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, Florida This will acknowledge receipt of your notice of public hearing concerning Parcels #3 and #4 to be considered at your Board hearing on February 25, 1964. Parcel No. 3, when the same was in the unincorporated area of the County, was zoned 'RU-1 (Single Family Residential) and several nice homes had been built in the area. In view of this and the 'fact that the surrounding area is zoned and de- veloped single family residential, it is recommended that single family residential zoning be established on the property. As to Parcel No. 4, Lots 2 and 3 of Block 4, Davis Manor, when in the unincorporated area of the County, were zoned RU-1, and Lot 1 was zoned RU-5 (Professional Office classification) . Lots 2 and 3 were vacant, but an office building was built on a portion of Lot 1. Although RU-2 (Duplex Residential) might appear to be a more appropriate zoning on Lots 2 and 3 in view of the existing pro- fessional office building to the East and the service station and grocery store to the South, it is felt ' that consideration should be given to the sentiment of the people residing in the single family residential area to the West and to the North, and E 'ft E I V E all METRO DADE COUNTY FEB2 4 1964 ALL AMERICA CITY CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI S.. Planning & Zoning Board City of South Miami Page Two if there is an objection, the same should be zoned for single family residential uses. As far as Lot 1 is concerned, . it is felt that the professional office use classification should be applied to the same. Very truly yours, R. Cook, Director RFC/CCC/vd LO n S.W. 75 TERR. 21 -- 53 S.W. 75'TERR.LPN r uJ 6ps p " N ev. �n n s.le N a 09 6610 6600 6550 6540 01 i 6530 I 651021 _ 25125 a+, ��Im O 06 �• I 9 09 �c I' O 7 J 7531 co 121 01 7� 8 G 7 6 A16 I 7570: � � I 7571 3 I. 2 07 �. 10 P Ia 6551 02 0 02 g 7 I a 8 7551 07 06 35 35 _ '�° \-`/-�° �" S.W. 76 -ST�� Ol � 04 6 03 (nq tl ,m 1O0 N _I 7611 1e• 40 ua.o 5 44 7611 I I� = .25 AC. 25 6560 6540 6520E 2C5 " I a 11 I I 1 OS d 02 �I I TR CT A - 3 19 2 18 O1 a e 2 17 � .e"' � I 76 7621 645 6635 6625 r— — — 7621 2 °I I 2 06 � N p 20 21 22 12 ,n s 4 5 6 a � 'E.. I ¢ 7E 39 ^' 6561 6541 6521 �p I Z I 3 s u n 7631 - .38 AC. 6634 29 N OI I (.J 2 42 7631 21 5 8IIr; x7630a ; N cu S.W. 76 TERR. a..°1a wI 4/7-E - s .31 AC. I I 30 Q �y>C� a 13 $I 'pE 33 I 2 y 6562 6542 4 I w 35 35 7651 I 7640 ° 14 a!' axes x sea L=,a—s 3 25 24 2 C C P 1 - 7641 wa. 121 5 7E 44 E z' Eti2 V 7 23 745 AC. 32 31 —__ 4 3 c > _26 `\ 27 28 n 5 15 I ^I 7C 5 4 V 6 7651 y 6 P` 7709 $ 'zsaE 40 _ 6621 6601 50 6563 6543 6523 16 Esxn an \ v O cu 7661 P=7 to N S.W. 77 TERR. E 42 N 01 52 N F7721. s 6630 6620 6610 6600 6570 S 0 6550 12 Q G5$s ``° � 5 �o �Pl 7730 7731 as 02 03 X04 ,x OS 01 E 02 Po 03 y 2 OS '3 03 7740 b 10 13 �93p s e 12 bll e10 09 p08 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 _ E3! 06 bkb� / bas � 7801 6625 6611 6557 6543 6529 6515 s 6501 / n bAb 2 5 Q N b� 6 31 o S.W. 78 TERR. ----_-- _— N _- D N N // ° ,10. 7 34 n J 6646 6624 6610 6556 6544 6530 b " 8 35 7 n 6 5 4 `3 2 _ 1 a \� bpbo s 20 19 IB 17 16 \'P IS �4by�, �} 36 ".'�o 21 22 23 25 P\O n�•L 10 4 37 P J bb ' 35 - 8 9 10 � 12 ,�� /�3• n 11 38 n 7891 6625 6611 6557 12 n So OV r va j �0 39 ca N S.W. 79 ST. ,3 N 26 Li to b5�o 40 In O as h s 27 2 Q y0.,. 14 0 . 41 n �� b O�N $ .40 AC. 1 if (O 15 42 `J .62 AC. 35 . J 6601 43 '5 0 N N - —- -— DAVIS DRIVE - 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING By the Planning and Zoning Board of the City of South Miami, _at City Hall,. 6130 Sunset Drive, 8:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 24, 19630 There will be a public hearing to consider INITIAL ZONING by South Miami of the areas known as PARCELS #1 and #2. All interested parties are urged to attend the meeting. The Board reserves the right to recommend to the City Council whatever the Board considers in the best interest of the areas involved. Jack Stanton, Chairman Planning and Zoning Board City of South Miami, Florida PIMA. l c i' i METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY • FLORIDA ROOM 701 BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT 1351 N. W. 12TH STREET September 23 5'g MIAMI 35, FLORIDA p ! 1 6 9`3 FRANKLIN 7-6911 Planning and Zoning Board City of South Miami City Hall 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, Florida Gentlemen: We appreciate the receipt of the three notices involving two zoning district changes and a variance on property within the municipal boundaries of South Miami, namely (1) hots 1, 2 and 3 and the North 201 of Lots 24, 25 and 26 of Block 1 of Westerfield Manor - 0-1 and RU-1 to C-2 (2) Parcels 1 and 2 located at S.W. 84 Terrace and Red Road and at S. W. 62nd Ave. and 82nd St. respectively. To consider initial zoning. (3) Parcel lying between Snapper Creek and Kendall. Drive at S.W. 62nd Ave. Relative to #(1), we would oppose the rezoning of this RU-1 and C-1 property to C-2. We feel that the property in this area of Bird Road should be maintained in a zoning district of a commercial or send-commercial nature to be in keeping with other development in the area. Certainly no additional service stations are needed, there being sufficient stations to serve the area in the Red Road and Ludlum Road areas. Relative to #(2) we would recommend single family residential zoning of a restric- tive type, probably something comparable to the EUM district, which requires 12011 frontage and 15,000 sq. ft. of lot area. Relative to #(3), we would oppose the location of an electric power sub-station at the site proposed, it being in a single family estate area. The sub-station would obviously detract from the liveability of the adjacent properties, and could readily be located in commercial or industrial properties along U.S. #1 to the West. Very truly yours, R. F. Cook, Director RFC/gh NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING By the Planning and Zoning Board of the City of South Miami, at City Hall, 6130 Sunset Drive, 8:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 10, 1963. There will be a public hearing to consider INITIAL ZONING by South Miami of the area known as PARCEL #7. All interested parties are urged to attend the meeting. The Board reserves the right to recommend to the City Council whatever the Board considers in the best interest of the area involved. Jack Stanton, Chairman PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD City of South Miami, Florida V � o W I� l¢ 0"a" Ap, AREA CODE 305,FRANKLIN I-3671 CABLE ADDRESS BLACKWALK" T.J.BLACKWELL JOHN B.KELLEY WILLIAM H.WALKER,JR. JAMES A.BURNES PLEASE ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO THE FIRM WILLIAM L.GRAY,JR. HOWARD E.BARWICK ALFRED M.FRANKLIN PAUL R.LARKIN,JR. ///�-77�- JOHN A.KOTTE BETTY F: ORKIN RY �� / W.L.BLACKWELL,JR. JACK LEE ORKIN ✓ Y.��( ,f(f SAMUEL J.POWERS,JR. GEORGE V.LANZA ROBERT G.YOUNG EDWARD L.MAGILL 100 N.E.FIRST AVE.,MIAMI 32, FLORIDA JOHN R.HOEHL JOSEPH C.SIMS WILLIS H.FLICK JOHN RODGERS CAMP,JR. ROBERT ASTI WILLIAM L.GRAY,III RAY A.PETERSON GERALD A.LEWIS JOSEPH H.WALKER HARRY W.BERT,JR. September 9, 1963 G.RUSSELL CRO ETON CARLOS L.ED WARDS CLEMEN J.EHRLICH WILLIAM F JOHNSTON J.JAY DIDRENCE JAMES E.TRIBBLE CARL P.STEPHENS,JR, DONALD D.GILLIS MELVIN T.BOYD R.A.ORTMAYER OTIS B.RADEBAUGH,JR. FRANCIS A.C.SEVIER WILLIAM F.MURPHY R.LAYTON MANK Planning and Zoning Board Attn: Mr. Jack Stanton South Miami, Florida Re: Initial Zoning Gentlemen: We have previously written to you concerning our objections con- cerning the proposed zoning in Area 7. A previous hearing was held on August 13, 1963. The proposed zoning at the previous hearing was from the long existing zoning EUl (acre) to proposed zoning RU 1 (single family) . This application was denied on August 13, 1963 by the Zoning Board. Subsequently, the City Coun- cil held a hearing on August 20, 1963 and finally on September 3, 1963. On August 13, the Planning and Zoning Board Committee re- commended that the area north of Hardee Road (involving Mr, Craig's property) should be zoned RU 1 and the area south of Hardee Road should be zoned 1/2 acres, all in Parcel 7. It is our understanding there are 12,500 feet in a lot zoned RU 1 (there are 42,460 feet in an acre) . At this time I would like to readopt my formal objection which I filed with this Board (letter dated August 3, 1963) and also my formal protest filed with the City Council of South Miami dated August 31, 1963, For all practical purposes, the objection to this proposed initial zoning contemplated is just as objectionable, if not more so,than the proposed zoning initiated by Mr. Craig. As we have previously stated to this Board, in our oral presenta- tion, many of the individuals who live in this area have come out for one purpose, and that is to be situated on full acre lots giving one room to stretch and live unto himself. Those of us who moved out in this area .did so only after full investigation with the then responsible public authorities who assured us that this was an a ea confined to the development of acre estates. All homes built in this area are on one acre or larger land areas, Planning and Zonin. _,oard Attn: Mr. Jack Stanton, Chairman September 9, 1963 Page Two Aside from the aesthetics which I have pointed out previously, I do not believe it is fair and just to rezone that which would affect the economic values and long-term mortgage commitments of the property owners in this area. Any argument that rezoning of this property to EU 1 is for the "public good" is not valid. The public at this point is not moved and it is a phantom. The only rights and the only issue involved are the rights existing between the property owners who have relied on zoning and the speculators who are waiting to cut up the property. Civic pride and civic participation cannot be done by law. It must be done by individuals and public officials who have a pride in beauty. The aesthetics and the beauty which is involved in this specific area and case, is the result of an affirmative per- sonal effort by people who have a special sense for civic pride, and beauty. This sense of beauty is born and not made. We, in Area 7, are very proud of the type pf individuals who have helped to attain this sense of civic pride. As a casual investigation will reveal, retired individuals live here as well as electricians, owners of businesses, managers of establishments, school teachers, and educators, etc. The majority of these people are exceptional people and exceptional parents who don't depend upon the out- - stretched hand of the government to fulfill their needs and res- ponsibilities of the family. The people who live in this area are individuals who have not lived in the grey twilight, who know either victory or defeat in their personal lives. They chose this area because it provided them with a way of living. We, accordingly, are not asking for anything except that which we have earned. No one will dispute that a well kept area or an area which has been zoned for acres will be dras- tically affected if the homes next door or across the street are being jammed against each other. The good planning which accentuated the development of Area 7 and its adjoining area by the County should not be condemned at this time. It is only necessary to travellaround and take a good hard look and see the fruits of good planning from surrounding communities. This good planning works to the advantage of all. There is a tendency, if not protected by the law, that as land be- comes more scarce building speculators move in. This form of lack of civic pride can be dealt with adequately by the majority of the Board and by the Council which should not forget that open spaces are the most precious thing a City can offer its citizens. This is the policy of the City of South Miami as it appears in one of its official publications. Land- once built upon or rezoned to a lower echelon cannot be recaptured. Zoning, like water, will always BLACKWELL. WALKER IN GRAY, MIAMI, FLORIDA VI Planning and Zoning Board Attn: Mr. Jack Stanton, Chairman September 9, 1963 Page Three flow to the lowest elevation. We have no difficulty in arriving at the conclusion that the pro- tection of property values is an objective which falls within the exercise of the powers of the lowest echelon of government: This protection from you is what we are asking -- nothing more -- nothing less. Anything that tends to destroy property values of the inhabitants of a city, necessarily adversely affects the pros- perity, the morale and, therefore, the general welfare of the entire city. Once the aesthetic and economic value in a particular area is depreciated, the value of the surrounding property is also de- preciated and there is grave and present danger that the same thing may be repeated elsewhere. I, therefore, object to this proposed initial zoning which is now up for consideration. Respectfully submitted, Robert Asti RA/ak BLACKWELL, WALKER & GRAY, MIAMI, FLORIDA ,1 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIRG By the Planning and Zoning Board of the City of South Miami, at City Hall, 6130 Sunset Drive, 8000 p.m. on Tuesday, November 12, 1963 . There will be a public hearing to consider INITIAL ZONING by South Miami of the areas known as PARCELS #5, 08 and #9, and legally described hereinafter. All interested parties are urged to attend the meeting. The Board reserves the right to recommend to the City Council what- ever the Board considers in the best interest of the areas involved. Parcel No. 5 - Beginning at the NW corner of the S2 of the SW4 of the SE4 of the NE4 of Section 35, Twp. 54 South, Range 40 East, Dade County, Florida; thence run Easterly along the North line of said S2 of the SW4 of the SE4 of the NE4 to the NW corner of "Ludlam Groves" according to the plat thereof recorded in 'Rlat Book 51 at Page 48 of the Public Records of Dade County Florida; thence run Southerly along the West line of "Ludlam Groves" to a point on the South line of the NE4 of said Section 35 and the centerline of SW 80 St. (Davis Road) thence run Westerly along tt:e South line of said NE4, being the centerline of SW 80 St. (Davis Road) to the SW corner of the 5E4 of the NE4 of said Section 35; thence run Northerly along the West line of the SE4 of the NE4 of said Section 95 to the NW corner of the S2 of the SW4 of the SE4 of the NE4 of said Section 35 and the Point of Beginning. Parcel No. 8 - Begin' i.ng at the SW corner of the NW4 of the SW4 of Section 24, Twp. 54 South, Range 40 East thence in a Northerly direction along the centerline of SW 67 Avenue (Ludlam Road) to the NW corner of the SW4 of the NW4 of the SW4 of Section #�24, Twp. 54 South, Range 40 East; thence in an ��(� Easterly direction to the NE corner of the Wh of I the SW4 of the NW4 of the SW4 of Section 24, Twp. , C5 54 South, Range 40 East; thence in a Southerly �e direction to the SE corner of the W2 of the SW4 of (Jthe NW4 of the SW4 of Section 24, Township 54 South, Range 40 East thence in a Westerly direction 330 ft more or less to the centerline of SW '67 Ave. (Ludlam ' Road) also the SW corner of the NW-14 of the SW4 of Section 24, Twp. 54 South, Range 40 East; to the Point of Beginning. Parcel No. 9 - Beginning at the NW corner of the SW4 of Section 24, Township 54 ,South, Range 40 East, Dade County, Florida, being the intersection of the centerline of SW 67 Avenue (Ludlam Road) and SW 48 Street (Blue Road) ; thence run Easterly along the North line- of the SW4 of said Section 24, and the centerline of SW 48 Street (Blue Road) to the NE .corner .ot the NW4 of the NW4 of the SW4, of said Section 24; thence run Southerly, along the East line of the NW4 of the NW4 of the SW4 of said Section 24, to the SE corner of the N4 of the NW4 of the NW4 of the SW4 of said Section 24; thence run Westerly, along the South line of the N� of the MA74 of the NW4 of the SW-4 of said Section 24 to the SW corner of the N% of the NW4 of the NW4, of the SW 4 of said Section 24, being a point on the centerline of SW 67 Avenue (Ludlam Road) ; thence run Northerly, along the West line of the SW4 of said Section 24, and the centerline of SW 67 Avenue to the NW corner of the SW4 of said Section 24 and the Point of Beginning . Jack Stanton, Chairman Planning and Zoning Board City of South Miami, Florida NOVEMBER 12, 1963 MR. COBURN OF 'THE DADS COUNTY' PLANNING BOARD CALLED ME, TODAY .AND SAID THAT THEY DID NOT RECEIVE 'A NOTICE: REGARDING THE ZONING -OF PARCELS 5 A and -9. THEY WOULD LIKE TO GO ON RECORD AS AGREEING WITH Ma. COOK'S 'OFFICE 'THAT THESE PARCELS COME IN AS Rif 1. -Ile November 12, 1963 Planning and Zoning Board City of South Miami City Hall 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, Florida Subject: Initial Zoning by South Miami of Parcel No. 5 4.e, the undersigned property owners and residents of the City of South. Miami and Metropolitan Dade County, request that the City of South Miami zone this Farces RU-1 or RU-lA. Because all property in the 'ity abutting this Parcel is zoned for single-family dwelling, we believe that the interests of of good zoning calls for a similar zoning here. t.Te note, more- over, that although county property immediately south of this Parcel is zoned RU-2, single-family. residences are now being built there. Thus an already existing single-family resident- ial neighborhood shows signs of continuing growth across polit- ical boundaries without change in the excellent residential quality of the neighborhood. Ne respectfully request that you permit us to maintain this residential quality, ,and our property values, by zoning Parcel No. 5 for single-family dwelling's. RESIDENT OF NAME ADDRESS CITY COUNTY X. Page-2 RESIDENT OF NAME ADDRESS CITY COUNTY Alwo � wC _. G� 8 � s o,� '7� f��. ✓ ,'C .c . - �y � i� a ,✓• �xai/�y([/ � /J/ u...e.4+,r.:t/.�...:... ..._.. k, ... ._ :W. ._ ..._ _ ... x. .,..+e_.,n._...._._..__..._.__.__..,�......._.�._... ..._...__..,.........-_u...iv:.m..,..._.«..,.v....... .,...n...... ,bw-w..._r.¢.+...... ...........+s. ..: . .-,,, 1y _�.........._:,..o.u... ' _._._.._�__..._.�_..-:..,.,._..-...._......_._..._. _�...,... __. ...n.............en..«....-.•nn«. .v..a+.x.....va we.wr.rv......:..sv ...w. .,ryv .,n�.. _.ql. i METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY • FLORIDA ROOM 701 BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT 1351 N. W. 12TH STREET MIAMI 35, FLORIDA November 8, 1963 FRANKLIN 7-6911 Planning and Zoning Board 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, Florida Gentlemen: We appreciate the receipt of your notice of hearing to consider initial zoning on Parcels #5, #8, and #9. It is our recommendation that all three parcels be rezoned to a single family residential (RU-1) zone, which would be in con- formity and compatible with the zoning in the adjgcent unincorporated areas in all cases. Very truly yours, CX�- R. F. Cooks Director RFC/gh SUPpi�p fIRVICa - �SDN INSS�CE IMF' EA- SON INSURANCE, INC. 1150 S. W. FIRST STREET • MIAMI 36, FLORIDA • FR 1-0292 FR 1-0527 November 11, 1963 Pla vaing and Zoning Board City of South Miami City Hall 6130 Sunset Brile South Miami , Florida SUBJECT: Initial Zon*.!g by South Miami of Parcel No, 5 Gentlemen: I am a property owner of the City of South Miami residing at 7871 S. Wo 69th Avenue and would like to bring to the attention of the Board, the following information: is On May 17, 1961, a public hearing was held by the Metropol- itan Dade County Zoning Board on a request for the rezoning of the western portion of Parcel No. 5 from RU-3 to RU-4 and a variance of setback requirements to permit a proposed con- valescent-nursing home. Isent a letter to the Zoning Direct- or , City of South Miami requesting that the City voice aaa ob- jection to this reVest (copy attached). It is my understand- ing that this was done. A petition signed by seventeen (17) property owners objecting to the rezoning was presented to the Metro Zoning Board(copy attached) . The request was den- 'a ied at this time by the ZonF�;Ag;_Board. v 2. On April 17 , 1963 another request was made to the Metropol- itan Dade County Zoning Appeals Board for rezoning to RU-4 and a variance in setback requirements and in addition to a previous request that a variance be given of spacing require--c', ments to permit future expansion of a convalescent home. A 0 new petition, with twenty-six signatures objecting to a v re.., zoning, was presented to the Zoning Appeals Board. Dr:- Carl Snyder and I appeared before the City of South Miami Zoning Board on April 9 , 1963 and requested that the City of South Miami again object to any,-.,rezon Age or variances on this prop- erty. It is my understanding that this was done. At this Public Hearing on April 17 , 19630 this request was again de- nied and on May 9 , 1963, their decision was upheld by the Board of County Commissioners. Planning and Zoning Board November 11, 1963 In the meantime , on April 23, 1963, Parcel No. 5 was approved for annexation by the City of South Miami. On October '22 , 1963, the owner of the largest portion of this Parcel applied for rezoning to RU-4 for a change in zoning to allow Garden-type Apartments. The applicant was requested to withdraw the request as this parcel must still come up for in- itial zoning. At this time , I would like to request of this Board that they recommend that this entire parcel be zoned be zoned RU-1 or RU-lA for single family residences for the following reasons: 1. City property abutting the parcel is presently zoned for single family residences, RU-1 2. Dade County property on the West side of S. W, 69th Avenue "d North of S. 19. 80th Street is zoned for acre estates, EU-1. 3. Two pieces of this Parcel No. 5 is already zoned for single family residences, RU-1. 4, Dade County property on South bide of ►S. W. 80th Street is zoned for two family or duplex, RU-2 and at the present time, being constructed on this property are single family and sec- ondary single family residences. In closing, it is believed that the residential quality of this, area can only be maintained if proper zoning is strictly adhered to and by not permitting any spot zoning in residential area. Therefore it is requested that all of Parcel No. 5 be initially zoned for Single Family Residences, RU-1, Respectfully, 4xv ROBERT W. GARDNER 7871 S. W. 69th Avenue -� South Miami 43 , Florida ry Z4«57TH f 214% Dir*otor (1=7 of smth MiUd * Ua# HaDo BO*Td Ot t� , Qr r Of pia" t1t ftlt .t It Oity 091 ft"k, Nib 011aum Come %UU matte "kd#m Cd 'b S tus Of tbol CITY at Math *SOL At .fit tb* city smtu ft" eat old lder IA d t *?1 �t to t scout $ ,"Ut fly a t wt It tuo *414 1 v. v"llowr-Oww- is allow" tat *II. Coma" ac rd omtertal In tkot tbo W* oxty valxta it milft be "U" stua tba. that. t 0d l for *are ,�,�y**u � � Le to A�p that � rra�a ward a� 'M ZeaW, � 'Mth * •Of O-w- 66th $tlr M,to tOVAld I' ` ftVIOMI. .%QfttA mtsmi s&o aro f t ' O r*visatod toes v Jet doh! '&sw. 78th T+ 06 JOY** I �"Obft MO. IOU # 600 V Wo Y*tl% True Mr, SAW" OwU#14w r� Mr.* J04M to vomit ' Ifth w"** 'lave Ott Mimbeth Sheff and oleo attornoy, w1w OtMA the proper do rt d +aar �.� �� r — � ? �w� �.�r� n 1��j: � 'v'"aa0 ttt D al CO in , urd ta* this act or,# but t2 chat*, h&r* � no a v fry t1v*m- �,: a + 6 r r��PO� a a s than r t- + ;� this r;Oaeo. for Singlt fAlmily dwallinSe it is fQ1t that Paa��bly Lj the t� f this r v l e v thre O'"R(W vroU ld be in sk IxtttaR? ty to �� rto te ark ror It i �`�»' L' �'t' L t?:tT .eons DOP-4rtZtnt of the Of x r'04 fat d ir#4 t*d to V0104 gm an Ob ion to t o a�o�� and rarimAtav both In 4tir aTW b` JnPPO&r!A9 in ptraon at thn Public Ha artna. T"Mukint you for your a.coperstjor . , ' t:47XiLYRYk 4i=s �.`�.�la�� 787 stz $tr . A nib ftr"t 916joatt xstftj�slitaar Zoning Dealt art R. Sys s l6. D. W&# 1or �^~vw&migwd VrMarty suers and rnsaUata U of N*Uvpol.i.tm Do& Gountyp wb& to r gistaor a4 obje ctioat to the rogarst for a prop I* OonUg and variamoo is the above m atUre rt iao f It that Ile trsp®li tan DmAm County sb=U aosariam ly 60m i dar Wdm wafter to so fol tbat it is as tse of Vw seeing of the Citq st %%6k MUSt OW 99tropoUtan a Cat ty* As proms a wsors in 1rta�a- prtUMaaaaa Goum*s w Wliwm that the prosest saaias of 1 3 for WAU pvpwrty in gashm is a saffiaienct depulwo frm the adjaeout ftfqr at $90 W&A IGNIN for Siiat.a Taal %allimp and the faafo Co=IW semi" st *we Sa►tataaae There abmij be a, iogioal ar m yos of wring and art m Skiamp from mingle fawL4 dMoaal.16% to IN 1t w apRtan 't �ae An mot a �alosoont homm o o ago of *0 Opinion drat i�' and lea is s a3.]. o'Jawwot prsportiar om lad as** a ffto d..1A *a-. um iep rty varluse lem be Imerad. D for oper*tai.an m somm idwatim of the abovos sa my Very truly rovras ' r 22 - 1 i 1 P. F. aook, 1(ir"tear Yoh', 1961 • ,._mac/ � j / "?' 4` Ly >� .0 14• lK S � �,� y AID: , w a�P, t.nt rl('p r" Igr,&, of tjp-rty �f1f`I".` dlll: r,: Ii.rFiLb tlY NeLr �{�ol vc>.c '✓1 ,t' ,t;unty, w' . « t `.r r al, IU le t: .r ! r,atsg� its ze :nt`, , IrI v�: �anr� :r ,t.ovN ^latter. it is I@i' im, t fa 1. Ua .c- ok IL. 5 1LG "t t"' matter, �e «r ft•r . !:..t .s a or,-ak3cran :,f. '„rle Lonlrsg ..f thF Clt} of zouth mi<m.; ant; ur.tr•opt,ll',a.. ',,,(1e ucunty. As 4 roperty owners in or•trnpc :itart t,ao(- t'*unty, je -41 1':r v^ tho*. the present zoning, of hU 3 f Or prnpt?rty its yue on a �u: f.cjerit aep&r,,urE ''rta the as jac��;t City If Soutti Miram . Zonir% or 'Angle Family TeelL;rsg dno Lhe I)aoe County zoning of Acre .FSte.teF•. Thr-rr s•:cUl(l 'Le a 1091cal sequence of joning dna .ot an ar t•upt crsait" ram s .n,;lP family dweLl"' to hU 4 or opLrtvwnt if u�� s, cr in tr.:s care, a -,onvd,.•scent home. We are of no opinion that if ttlis z,)rling cnange and variance is ap'roved, all adjacent r-Iroperties can he materla.i al , ec�ted In that the r)roperty values will 1,e lower'PG" Thanki•-ig you for •, our c ,op,.rut- on and cunt ioeration of 'Lhe auove, owe are Very truly ,yours, b Ll % t ` tl• �,x _�:_':��.c.: _!_Cam: ._.__ � __ _�'. .�.._.�_..�...._.._�.. ___�._ ..._r...__ __...1_. ___._/.� ft • �4 t �'��' 1,'z�' � �-�?-�'�-.`,t-��,^• a. ------—_ �f.�.�._..�..�...�. 1.A ��.._.�._.�G rte;� Apt Ax t-•5//,`" tl'+w ! 'i..•.../ V"4�� 1' A� 1`.-I ,dy� -•,R.''�'�,*t_, � �'�--�►�,�'! ._.�,�,V? .�1 ��'� '•1..� - -----•-: , i W LUDLAM ROAD =N `" cn (A o O o tW d N rsn ss i�. �. '�� J 35 J 25 25 J O o 25 25 a m t a O N 525 5 J O J OI N 01 O � c co w co N D n m N m s N my LA a ID LA M 6 N W O wo —i ZJ O W � ° J O cn 25 A A�IIV' n my m co w I—O I. W Cl i.u. SOW a XI i �«a S N a, — — D �ft n N W $ W N O N P t A o O•I O N V � L � • � J J O �wr � /� nrn I I N O - � W e mar / I � uue !i O O N6S9�a 6ss S I Q, o N 0o 1 y� °e P in.W w IJ re n J N ru S.W. 66 AVE. N N 3s W o O W 1 N -S.W. 66 AVE.ti c n m N / rorw 25 25 "' N . m V LA N 6a ' aN N O B W L $ ,^ m „ ryI I W o8 `2 n O` 01 p V, dll- �II 25 25 a,.N Y N N N N �O A (Jl r O p= p 25 N '�v N 9 —i N o, (N -)l I O N o 25 25 Ln a, 01 W N N ru W T N a ae O o \ O N N W S.W. 65 NPL. n\ V b]4 J M7 B]t V V V W�O w r°u W N O W N N m O u`N FA �3 I . N BREWER CANAL Vr O/T Z r_ =- wl n_N N � _ b N W w N N n u 0 c ii r�- w N O O O LTJ H H O O O O O m H H r c c r c c x1 m H H 0 0 H. 0 i t z H H Z " o r r > rr � � o ° z z 0 F�-3 7J M 0 0 0 7u n K 0 � 0 ,� . d Z G� 11 �n o ' tr+ ]C rC1 CI] H Z U) o C d L=] td w m > n 3 C'7 bd w N ;Cl K rn C H � H 7d K rn C7 o Z > t0r1 w o L>-� � N � �Z n Cr] 7d n > 0 ro ` v' � > ' y v `�l rn rn rn � rn rn rn � cn cn (rn rn rn rn rn c i 0) _] O F-' N w N 0 0 0 O O O O f- -_] —1 —] _j [rJ Cyr J CyrJ C=7 trJ C 7 C K cn cn Z to cn 0 sf _�I 'r NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING By the Planning and Zoning Board of the City of South Miami, at City Hall, 6130 Sunset Drive, 8000 p.m. , on Tuesday, February 25, 1964 . There will be a public hearing to consider INITIAL Zoning by South Miami of the areas known as PARCELS i-3 and #4, and legally described hereinafter. All interested parties are urged to attend the meeting. The Board reserves the riht to recommend to the City Council what- ever the Board considers in the best interest of t;,.e areas involved. PARCEL NO. 3 - Beginning at the NW corner of tt:�e SW'4 of the SW.i of the 1VWk of Section 35, Township 54 Sout1l, Rancie 4":0 East; thence in a Northerly direction alone; the centerline of 67 Avenue (Ludlam Road) 165 feet, more or less, to the NW corner of the S12 of the S-� of the NW4 of th.a SW--4 of the NW4 of Section 36, Township 54 South Range 40 East; thence in an Easterly direction along the Nor,tl.s line of the Si of tl--,e S�2- of the NWT of -ilze SW4, of the Ni44 of said Section 3 :, a distance of 660 feet, more or less, to the NE corner of the S3-2 of the S% of the NWT of the SW-4 of the NWT of said Section 36, saki point also Being the NW corner of Lot No. 1, Bloc]---- 2 of DAVIS MANOR; thence in a Southerly direction along t1ne rear lot line of Lots I and 2, Block 2 of said DAVIS MANOR, 165 feet, more or less, to the NE corner of the SWI-4 of the SiAA4 of the N1,04- of Section 36, Township 54 South, Range ^'0 East; thence in a Westerly direction along the North line of the SVAj of the S*4- of the NV3y of Section 36, a distance of 560 feet, more or less, to the Point of Beginning. PARCEL NO. 4 - Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of the SW 80 Street (Davis Drive) and the centerline of SW 67 Avenue (Ludlam Road) ; thence in a Northerly direction along the centerline of said SW 67 Avenue to the intersection with the centerline of SW 79 Street, a distance of 250.70 feet, more or less; thence running Easterly along the centerline of SW 75' Street to its intersection with the centerline of SW 66 Avenue , a distance of 400 feet, more or less; thence Southerly along the centerline of SW c Avenue to -the centerline of SW 80 Street (Davis Drive) ; being also the South line of the NW4 of Section 36, Town- ship 54 South, Range 40 East, a distance of 251.65 feet, more or less; thence in a .Westerly direction along the centerline of �AW 80 Street (Davis Drive) , also the South line of the NWT of Section 36, to the center- line of SW 67 Avenue (Ludlam) to tl;.e POE. Jack Stanton, Chairman Planning and Zoning Board City of South Miami, Florida