/
     
MSL Moore Stephens Lovelace RFP FN-2016-06 Audit Services Proposal from MSLProposal for Professional Auditing Services The City of South Miami April 15, 2016 PROPOSER Moore Stephens Lovelace 701 Brickell Avenue, Suite 550 Miami, FL 33131 SUBMITTED BY William Blend, CPA, CFE Shareholder wblend@mslcpa.com 800.683.5401 COPY TABLE OF CONTENTS Transmittal Letter Independence ................................................................................................................................. 1 License to Practice in Florida .......................................................................................................... 2 Firm Qualifications and Experience ................................................................................................ 4 Firm History ................................................................................................................................. 4 Size of the Firm ............................................................................................................................ 4 Location of the Office that Will Oversee Services to the City ..................................................... 5 Relevant Governmental Auditing Experience ............................................................................. 5 Continuing Professional Education in Government Accounting ................................................. 8 Principal Staff Assignments and Experience ............................................................................. 10 Client Reference List .................................................................................................................. 19 Staff Quality and Continuity ...................................................................................................... 19 Prior Engagements with the City of South Miami ........................................................................ 20 Similar Engagements with Other Government Entities ................................................................ 21 Audit Approach ............................................................................................................................. 22 Overview ................................................................................................................................... 22 Standards-Based Audit Approach ............................................................................................. 22 Proposed Segmentation of the Engagement ............................................................................ 22 Level of Staff to be Assigned to Each Proposed Segment of the Engagement. ........................ 28 Samples Size and the Extent to Which Statistical Sampling is to be Used in the Engagement 29 Extent to Use of EDP Software in the Engagement .................................................................. 30 Type and Extent of Analytical Procedures to be Used in the Engagement .............................. 31 Approach to be Taken to Gain and Document an Understanding of the City’s Internal Control Structure .................................................................................................................................... 32 Approach to Determining Laws and Regulations that will be Subject to Audit Test Work ...... 32 Approach to be Taken in Drawing Audit Samples for Purposes of Tests of Compliance ......... 33 Identification of Anticipated Potential Audit Problems ............................................................... 34 Required Forms ............................................................................................................................. 35 Additional Information ................................................................................................................. 50 Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting ............................................ 50 External Quality Control Review ............................................................................................... 51 Price Proposal Sheet ..................................................................................................................... 53 April 14, 2016 Maria M. Menendez, CMC City Clerk City of South Miami 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, FL 33143 RE: RFP #FN-2016-06 – External Audit Services Dear Ms. Menendez and Members of the Auditor Selection Committee: Moore Stephens Lovelace, P.A. (MSL), sincerely appreciates the opportunity to provide you with our credentials and capabilities to serve as the City of South Miami, Florida’s (the City) independent auditors. Understanding of Municipalities All members of our engagement team have served municipal clients in the state of Florida. This means we understand the issues that are unique to the City. Our engagement team members have provided services to Ft. Lauderdale, Pembroke Pines, Tampa, Vero Beach, Cocoa Beach, and Daytona Beach, just to name a few. This means we understand the issues unique to a Florida city that will enable us to properly evaluate the accounting and reporting risks specific to your City, such as: Cash and Cash Equivalents, Debt, including Bonds, Notes Payable and Capital Leases, and Defined Benefit Pension Plans. MSL’s Commitment to the City of South Miami MSL’s commitment to the City is to meet all deadlines and respond to all of your inquiries and requests promptly. We will communicate with you at every level, including at City Commission meetings. This communication will include reporting financial results, audit issues, future accounting and reporting issues, and other issues that impact your financial statements and the audit process. As part of our service, an IT assessment will be performed each year and will provide (at no additional cost) technical support related to all new accounting and reporting pronouncements by our nationally recognized experts. During the engagement, MSL will only assign staff members from our Governmental Practice Group (GPG). This will ensure that you are always working with an audit team highly experienced in governmental accounting and auditing. High-Quality Services at a Value All of our government clients continue to seek ways to cut costs while obtaining the best professional service. MSL’s experience and thorough knowledge of Florida municipalities allows us to understand and identify the accounting and operational risks affecting the City. This enables us to provide the City with a high-quality audit that meets all of the applicable professional standards at a competitive price. IN D E P E N D E N C E INDEPENDENCE 1| Independence As part of our quality control procedures, we ensure the independence of our Firm and the assigned audit team under AICPA and Government Auditing Standards for every client for whom we perform attest engagements. This verification process is performed and documented at the start of every audit we perform. MSL is independent of the City of South Miami and its component units, as defined by generally accepted auditing standards and the U.S. General Accounting Office’s (GAO) Government Auditing Standards. MSL has not had any professional relationships with the City of South Miami for the past five (5) years. MSL shall give the City of South Miami written notice within five (5) days of any professional relationships entered into during the period of this agreement. LI C E N S E T O PR A C T I C E LICENSE TO PRACTICE IN FLORIDA 2| License to Practice in Florida MSL has been in business continuously for over 42 years. MSL and all assigned professional staff are properly licensed to practice in Florida. Copies of the relevant licenses follow: 3| QU A L I F I C A T I O N S & EX P E R I E N C E FIRM QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE 4| Firm Qualifications and Experience Firm History MSL is a Florida corporation that has been in continuous business for over 42 years and has grown to be one of the largest independently owned and operated firms of certified public accountants in the Southeast. We are a nationally recognized CPA firm, serving clients in more than 20 states and eight countries. Many of our shareholders are nationally recognized specialists in their field of practice. The Firm and all of its CPAs are actively involved with the FICPA and AICPA, as well as the Private Companies Practice Section of the AICPA. Members of our Governmental Practice Group (GPG) are involved with the AICPA’s Governmental Audit Quality Center (AICPA GAQC). Through our association with Moore Stephens North America, Inc. and Moore Stephens International Limited, we service clients throughout the world. While we are part of a network that provides us resources when needed, MSL is an independent Firm associated with Moore Stephens North America and Moore Stephens International Limited for the purposes of obtaining national or international resources when necessary. This association and the breadth and depth of services available to our clients are equivalent to those offered by the Big 4 firms. These services are enhanced by a more hands-on, personalized approach to serving client needs through our local headquarters. Because Moore Stephens North American firms are independent of one another, the accessibility of multiple professional services can be offered in a “one- stop shop” approach. Contrast this with the Big 4 firms: under the current regulatory environment, you would be required to obtain one service from one firm (e.g., attest) and look elsewhere for another firm to service your other business needs. We have collaborated with many other Moore Stephens firms. Our access to national and international resources allows us to provide the best local solutions for your organization. Size of the Firm MSL has almost 100 employees located in our four offices in Florida. MSL’s GPG includes 18 dedicated individuals. This total includes three Shareholders, three Managers, three Supervisors and six Seniors and Staff. All of the governmental staff assigned to the engagement for the City at the Supervisor level and above have obtained their CPA licenses. In addition, the GPG utilizes two IT Specialists and is supported by five Administrative Support personnel. MSL Staffing Firm GPG Shareholders 15 3 Managers 11 3 Supervisors 5 3 Seniors & Staff 34 6 IT Specialists 4 2 Support Staff 27 1 Total 96 18 5| Location of the Office that Will Oversee Services to the City The location of our office that services the South Florida area is 701 Brickell Avenue, Suite 550, Miami, FL 33131, and our Central Florida office is located at 255 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 600, Orlando, FL 32801. We will be utilizing full-time staff from both of these locations to service your engagement. Relevant Governmental Auditing Experience MSL is committed to the governmental sector. Our governmental practice accounts for a significant portion of our Firm’s revenues. Governmental work is not filler work at MSL. Our GPG performs services for the largest governmental entities in Central Florida. Members of this group dedicate 90% of their time working with governmental clients. MSL’s GPG has experienced significant growth locally and statewide. Currently, MSL is providing auditing services to approximately 40 governmental clients. MSL is proud to share with the City the following representative listing of clients for whom we have provided auditing services in the last five years. For all clients listed below, all deadlines were met. Client Name Type Length of Service Type of Services Contact Name, Title Municipalities City of Altamonte Springs Public 2005-2015 Annual Audit Mark DeBord, Finance Director City of Apopka Public 2014-2018 Annual Audit Pam Barclay, Finance Director City of Casselberry Public 2006-2015 Annual Audit Rebecca Bowman, Finance Director City of Cocoa Beach Public 2005-2019 Annual Audit Charles Holland, Finance Director City of Daytona Beach Public 2010-2013 Annual Audit Patricia Bliss, Chief Financial Officer City of Dunedin Public 2013-2017 Annual Audit Joseph Ciurro, Finance Director City of Ft. Lauderdale Public 2012-2015 Single Audit Linda Logan-Short, Finance Director City of Gulfport Public 2006-2010 Annual Audit James O'Reilly, City Manager City of Indian Rocks Beach Public 2006-2017 Annual Audit Dan Carpenter, Finance Director City of Kissimmee Public 2005-2015 Annual Audit Amy Ady, Finance Director City of Leesburg Public 2010-2016 Annual Audit William Spinelli, Finance Director 6| Client Name Type Length of Service Type of Services Contact Name, Title Municipalities (Continued) City of Mount Dora Public 2015-2019 Annual Audit Mike Sheppard, Finance Director City of Orlando Public 2013-2017 Annual Audit Rebecca Sutton, Chief Financial Officer City of Palm Bay Public 2010-2013 Annual Audit Yvonne McDonald, Finance Director City of Pembroke Pines Public 2010-2016 Commission Auditor Lisa Chong, Finance Director City of Sanford Public 2008-2017 Annual Audit Cynthia Lindsay, Director of Finance City of St. Cloud Public 2009-2011 Annual Audit Javier Gonzalez, Finance Director City of Tampa – Firefighters & Police Officers Pension Public 2011-2015 Annual Audit Tiffany Ernst, Plan Administrator City of Tampa – General Employee Pension Public 2012-2015 Annual Audit Lee Huffstutler, Chief Accountant City of Tampa – Single Audit Public 2011-2015 Single Audit Lee Huffstutler, Chief Accountant City of Tarpon Springs Public 2015-2017 Annual Audit Ron Harring, Finance Director City of Temple Terrace Public 2015-2019 Annual Audit Angela Atkinson, Finance Director City of Venice Public 2011-2015 Annual Audit Linda Senne, Interim Finance Director City of Winter Park Public 2005-2009 2013-2015 Annual Audit Wes Hamil, Finance Director Counties Broward County – Aviation (Component Auditor) Public 2010-2015 Annual Audit Aviation Helena James-Rendleman, Director of Finance Broward County – Water (Component Auditor) Public 2010-2015 Annual Audit Water and Wastewater Single Audit Natalie Otto, Fiscal Manager Citrus County Public 2010-2018 Annual Audit Angie Snodgrass, Director of Finance Lake County Public 2006-2015 Annual Audit Kristy Mullane, Chief Deputy Clerk 7| Client Name Type Length of Service Type of Services Contact Name, Title Counties (Continued) Osceola County Public 2008-2015 Annual Audit Michael Kurek, Comptroller Seminole County Public 2000-2018 Annual Audit Jenny Spencer, Finance Director Volusia County - Clerk of the Circuit Court Public 2005-2015 Annual Audit Bonnie O'Keefe, Director of Fiscal Operations School Districts School District of Brevard County Public 2014-2017 Annual Audit JoAnn Clark, Director of Financial Services School District of Broward County Public 2007-2011 Annual Audit Patrick Reilly, Director of Financial Reporting School District of Escambia County Public 2012-2016 Annual Audit Terry St. Cyr, Asst Supt - Finance & Bus Svcs School District of Manatee County Public 2014-2018 Annual Audit/ Internal A Adi Rebecca Roberts, Chief Financial Officer School District of Osceola County Public 2012-2016 Annual Audit Migdalia Mercado, Director of Finance School District of Pasco County Public 2011-2014 Annual Audit Joann Millovitsch, Finance Director School District of Seminole County Public 2010 2012-2013 2015 Annual Audit Todd Seis, Finance Director School District of Volusia County Public 2007-2008 2010-2011 2013-2014 Annual Audit Bertie Trawick, Finance Director Florida Virtual School Public 2014-2018 Annual Audit John Pavelchak, CFO Special Districts and Authorities Barefoot Bay Recreation District Public 2006-2015 Annual Audit Kimmi Cheng, Finance Director Central Florida Expressway Authority Public 2012-2016 Annual Audit Lisa Lumbard, Chief Financial Officer East Central Florida Regional Planning Council Public 2005-2015 Annual Audit Leila Hars, Finance Manager Early Learning Coalition of Flagler & Volusia Public 2010–2015 Annual Audit DJ Lebo, Executive Director Early Learning Coalition of Hillsborough County Public 2014-2018 Annual Audit Steve Costner, Finance Director 8| Client Name Type Length of Service Type of Services Contact Name, Title Special Districts and Authorities (Continued) Florida Intergovernmental Finance Commission Public 2004-2013 Annual Audit Craig Dunlap, President Greater Orlando Aviation Authority Public 2015-2019 Annual Audit Quarterly Reviews Hyatt Regency Audit Jacqueline Churchill, Chief Financial Officer MetroPlan Orlando Public 2005-2015 Annual Audit Harold Barley, Executive Director Miami-Dade Expressway Authority Public 2011-2015 Annual Audit Marie Schafer, Chief Financial Officer North Brevard Hospital District/Parrish Medical Public 2008-2015 Annual Audit Michael Sitowitz, Controller Osceola Heritage Park Public 2006-2015 Annual Audit Mary Burd, Director of Finance Sanford Airport Authority Public 2014-2017 (ext to 2021) Annual Audit Don Poore, Chief Financial Officer TOHO Water Authority Public 2005-2019 Annual Audit Rodney Henderson, Business Services Manager West Volusia Hospital Authority Public 2004-2014 Annual Audit Eileen Long, Accountant Continuing Professional Education in Government Accounting All members of MSL’s governmental team and all audit staff members assigned to this engagement, regardless of their individual roles of responsibility, are in compliance with the CPE requirements set forth in GAGAS issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. In addition, we are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Florida Statutes that require CPAs to meet CPE requirements prior to proposing on governmental audit engagements. It is our objective to provide our professional staff with at least 50 hours of comprehensive CPE each year. This is accomplished by attending seminars throughout the United States and is reinforced through in-house training. Our training programs are often open to our clients at no charge, so you can also fulfill some of your CPE requirements throughout the year. Our Firm offers 16-24 hours of CPE during the year to our staff and clients. Bill Blend is often asked to speak at training sessions for the FICPA, FGFOA and at various MSL training events. Bill is one of only a few CPAs in the state who is qualified and teaches the FICPA required ethics class, including a class specifically developed by the FICPA for governmental ethics. As a Certified Fraud Examiner, Bill also teaches fraud sessions for the FGFOA, as well as at client training sessions. 9| Dan O’Keefe is recognized as one of the top public sector instructors in the state of Florida and is also well-known on a national level. He has written numerous courses on various subjects related to governmental accounting and auditing. Joel Knopp has also been asked to speak at training sessions for the FGFOA, FSFOA, FASBO, and at MSL training events on topics related to various governmental accounting and auditing issues, including Single Audit and GASB updates. All members of the engagement team have properly maintained CPE credits in governmental accounting, as required by the Florida Board of Accountancy (FBOA). 10| Principal Staff Assignments and Experience MSL’s GPG is highly experienced in auditing Florida municipalities. Bill Blend, your Engagement Shareholder, has over 23 years of governmental auditing, accounting, and consulting experience in Florida. Bill serves on the Technical Accounting and Auditing Committees for both the FICPA and FGFOA. Dan O’ Keefe, your Technical Review Shareholder, has over 40 years of governmental auditing, accounting, and consulting experience. Dan is regarded as one of the most experienced governmental auditors in the state of Florida. Joel Knopp, your Engagement Manager, has more than 17 years of experience serving governmental entities. Eddy Castaneda, the Engagement Supervisor, has over nine years’ experience. Chris Ghosio and George Grachis, the team’s IT Specialists, each have over 25 years of experience in evaluating IT operations, including governments. Volney Jackson, your Engagement Senior, has more than 10 years of experience serving governmental and not-for-profit entities. Your engagement team has over 125 years of combined experience providing auditing, accounting, and consulting services to hundreds of Florida municipalities, more than 15 Florida counties, and dozens of special districts, and authorities. As a result of this collective knowledge and experience, your team is uniquely suited to provide you with the highest quality auditing services. We guarantee that all members of your team have municipality experience. You will not need to train our staff. All of our professional staff, including the auditor in charge of your engagement, meet the educational requirements set forth under Florida Statutes. Specific details of relevant continuing professional education and local governmental audit experience are found in each staff member’s résumé. MSL and all assigned key professional staff are properly registered and licensed to practice in the state of Florida. In addition, our Firm and all assigned key personnel are in good standing with the FBOA. MSL does not have a formal policy requiring staff rotation on engagements. We believe, and various studies have shown, that staff continuity benefits the audit process due to the acquired knowledge of clients and their operations. However, we respect the concerns that the public has on this issue and, if requested, the size of our GPG enables us to rotate an experienced governmental audit team during the course of the City’s contract, should the City request it. This is another factor that separates us from our competitors that do not have a dedicated GPG team. 11| William Blend, CPA, CFE Engagement Shareholder Education and Certifications • B.S. Degree in Accounting, Long Island University • C.P.A., Certified Public Accountant - Florida • C.F.E., Certified Fraud Examiner Professional Memberships and Affiliations • AICPA • FICPA • Florida Government Finance Officers Association (FGFOA) • FGFOA Conference Committee • FGFOA Technical Committee • Instructor for the FGFOA and develops and teaches Firm auditing classes • FICPA Instructor - Ethics for Governmental CPAs in Florida • FICPA Technical Committee • Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) • FICPA State and Local Government Section • FICPA Compliance Practice Aid Team Member • FICPA High School Coordinator for Seminole County • Seminole County Chamber of Commerce Government Affairs Committee Listing of Relevant CPE Courses: 2012 – 2015 MSL Governmental Update Federal and State Single Audit Update (Instructor) FGFOA Annual Conferences – 2012-2015 Fraud Awareness Ethics for CPAs: Accounting/Auditing Emphasis (Instructor) GASB Update 2014 - 2015 AICPA GAQC 2015 Annual Update Webcast COSO and Internal Control Municipal Bankruptcies and Fiscal Sustainability Tax Exempt Debt / Accounting and Auditing Issues The External Auditor and Fraud (Instructor) Circular A-133 Audit Sampling Strategies - Webinar Background - Bill Blend is a member of the Firm’s Governmental Practice Group. Bill has over 23 years of public account- ing, governmental and not-for-profit experience. He has provided services to numerous municipalities, counties, and other governmental entities. Professional Experience - Bill has extensive experience in auditing the governmental financial operations of municipalities, counties, special districts, and authorities. He also provides consult- ing services in the areas of internal control assessments, litigation support, fraud remediation, and performance reviews. He has authored numerous CPE courses on governmental accounting and auditing and has instructed CPE sponsored by the FGFOA and the FICPA. Bill is one of only a few CPAs in the state qualified by the FICPA to teach their government ethics class, and he is often sought out as a speaker around the state. He is a two- time recipient of the FICPA Outstanding Discussion Leader Award. Bill is a Certified Fraud Examiner and is trained in the use of IDEA data-mining software. 12| William Blend, CPA, CFE (Continued) Engagement Shareholder Governmental, educational, and other entities served include the following: *Indicates Single Audit included Counties Municipalities (Continued) Special Districts and Authorities Broward* Kissimmee* Barefoot Bay Recreation District Citrus* Lake Helen Central Florida Expressway Authority Indian River* Leesburg* East Central Florida Regional Planning Council* Lake* Maitland* Florida Intergovernmental Finance Commission Osceola* Mt. Dora* Greater Orlando Aviation Authority (GOAA)* Seminole* New Smyrna Beach* Hobe Sound Water Management District Volusia* Oak Hill Memphis-Shelby County Airport Authority Orlando* MetroPlan Orlando* Municipalities Palm Bay* Miami-Dade Expressway Authority* Altamonte Springs Palm Beach Gardens* New Smyrna Beach Utility Authority* Apopka* Pembroke Pines* Sanford Airport Authority* Casselberry* Port Orange* TOHO Water Authority* Cocoa Beach* Sanford* West Volusia Hospital Authority Coral Springs* St. Cloud* Davie Tampa* Educational Daytona Beach* Tarpon Springs* Academie DaVinci Charter School DeBary* Temple Terrace The Reading Edge Academy Deltona* Venice* Florida A&M University* Dunedin* Vero Beach* Florida Virtual School * Gulfport* Winter Park* School District of Manatee County* Indian River Shores School District of Broward County* Indian Rocks Beach School District of Escambia County* School District of Osceola County* School District of Pasco County* School District of Seminole County* School District of Volusia County* 13| Daniel J. O’Keefe, CPA, MBA, CFE Technical Review Shareholder Education and Certifications • M.B.A. Degree in Accounting, Florida State University • B.S. Degree in Accounting, Canisius College, Buffalo, New York • C.P.A., Certified Public Accountant - Florida • C.F.E., Certified Fraud Examiner Professional Memberships and Affiliations • AICPA • Served on the AICPA State and Local Government Expert Panel • Member of the AICPA National State and Local Government Conference Committee • Speaker at the AICPA National State and Local Government Accounting Conference and the National Not-for-Profit Conference • FICPA • Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) • Florida Government Finance Officers Association • Member of the FICPA Governance Task Force • Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) • UCF Accounting Advisory Board member • Past Chairman of the Seminole State College Foundation Listing of Relevant CPE Courses: 2012 - 2015 MSL Governmental Update Training FGFOA Annual Conferences – 2012 – 2015 COSO for State and Local Governments (Instructor) Federal Financial Reporting GASB Pension & Financial Reporting Yellow Book and Green Book Fraud Waste and Abuse in Government Municipal Bankruptcies and Fiscal Sustainability (Instructor) The External Auditor and Fraud AICPA GAQC 2015 Annual Update Webcast MSL Governmental Financial Accounting and Reporting Case Study (Instructor) Background - Dan O’Keefe has over 40 years of public accounting, governmental, and not-for- profit experience. He heads up the Firm’s Governmental Practice Group, serves on the Firm’s Board of Directors, and is the Firm’s Secretary. He has provided services to numerous municipalities, counties, and other governmental entities, and is a nationally recognized expert in the area of governmental auditing. He is one of the most sought-after public sector instructors in the state. Professional Experience - Dan has extensive experience auditing governmental financial operations, including services provided to 50 municipalities, 16 counties, four state agencies, and numerous special districts and authorities. He also provides consulting services in the areas of internal control assessments, litigation support, fraud reme- diation, and performance reviews. Dan provides CPE services to clients, peers, and governmental agencies nationwide. He has authored numerous CPE courses on governmental accounting and auditing; instructed CPE sponsored by the AICPA and the FICPA; and previously served a four-year term on the Florida Board of Accountancy CPE Committee. He is a three-time recipient of the FICPA Outstanding Seminar Leader Award and two-time recipient of the AICPA Outstanding Instructor Award. He is an adjunct Professor at the University of Central Florida and the University of West Florida. Dan is the co-author of A State Lottery: A Challenge for Auditors; co-author of Auditing Budget Requirements for Florida’s Local Governments; and author of the 1996 Single Audit Requirements. In addition, Dan authored the Florida Single Audit Act. 14| Daniel O’Keefe, CPA, MBA, CFE (Continued) Technical Review Shareholder Governmental, educational, and other entities served include the following: Counties Municipalities (Continued) Special Districts and Authorities Alachua* Leesburg* Barefoot Bay Recreation District Broward* Longwood Central Florida Expressway Authority Citrus* Maitland* Fort Pierce Utilities Authority Collier* Margate East Central Florida Regional Planning Council* DeSoto* Mount Dora* Greater Orlando Aviation Authority* Hillsborough* Ocala Miami-Dade Expressway Authority* Indian River* Orchid Memphis-Shelby County Airport Authority Lake* Orlando* MetroPlan Orlando* Manatee* Ormond Beach Orange County Housing Finance Authority* Marion* Pahokee Orange County Library District Okeechobee* Palm Bay* Reedy Creek Improvement District Orange* Palm Beach VOTRAN* Osceola* Palm Beach Gardens* TOHO Water Authority* Martin* Pembroke Park West Volusia Hospital Authority Seminole* Pembroke Pines* Volusia* Pomona Park Educational Port Orange* Academie DaVinci Charter School Municipalities St. Cloud* Bethune-Cookman College* Altamonte Springs Sanford* Early Learning Coalition of Flagler/Volusia* Apopka* Sebring* Florida A&M University* Belle Isle South Daytona Florida Virtual School* Bradenton Tamarac Frank Scanga Charter School Bunnell Tampa* Futures, Inc. Casselberry* Tarpon Springs * Kissimmee Charter School Cocoa Beach* Temple Terrace Orlando Lutheran Academy Coral Springs* Venice* Reading Edge Academy Crystal River Vero Beach* School District of Brevard County* Davie Wellington School District of Broward County* Daytona Beach* West Palm Beach School District of Escambia County* Daytona Beach Shores Winter Garden School District of Manatee County* DeBary* Winter Haven School District of Osceola County* Deltona* Winter Park* School District of Pasco County* Dunedin* Winter Springs School District of Seminole County* Green Cove Springs School District of Volusia County* Gulfport* State Agencies Stetson University Holly Hill Florida Lottery Indian Rocks Beach Florida Health Department Other Kissimmee* Florida Housing Finance Agency Florida Intergovernmental Finance Commission Lake Mary* Florida Department of Elder Affairs Lake Park Lauderdale Lakes *Indicates Single Audit included 15| Joel Knopp, CPA Engagement Manager Education and Certifications • B.S. Degree in Accounting - Eastern University • C.P.A., Certified Public Accountant - Florida and Virginia Professional Memberships and Affiliations • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) • Florida Institute of Certified Public Accountants (FICPA) • Florida Government Finance Officers Association (FGFOA) • FGFOA Conference Planning Committee • Leadership Orlando – Class of 89 Listing of Relevant CPE Courses: 2012 - 2015 MSL Governmental Update FGFOA Annual Conferences – 2012 – 2015 Federal Financial Reporting GASB Pension & Financial Reporting Yellow Book and Green Book Fraud Waste and Abuse in Government Ethics for CPAs: Accounting/Auditing Emphasis (Instructor) GASB Update 2014 – 2015 AICPA GAQC 2015 Annual Update Webcast Municipal Bankruptcies and Fiscal Sustainability Tax Exempt Debt / Accounting and Auditing Issues The External Auditor and Fraud (Instructor) Circular A-133 Audit Sampling Strategies - Webinar Background - Joel Knopp is a member of the Firm’s Governmental Practice Group. Joel has over 17 years of experience in accounting and auditing and works primarily with governmental clients. Professional Experience - Joel has performed audits on over 40 govern- mental entities. He has substantial experience in planning, performing, supervising, reviewing and preparing financial statements related to the audits of governmental entities and not- for-profit organizations subject to Government Auditing Standards and Federal and State Single Audit require- ments. As a Manager, Joel is responsible for scheduling, budgeting, supervising staff, and coordinating multiple projects simultaneously. Joel works directly with clients’ management to develop strong relationships, resolve issues arising during audits, and ensures that engagements are performed in accordance with applicable professional standards and in a manner that is consistent with the clients’ goals. Joel’s previous experience includes work as an audit director for a CPA firm in Virginia, where he managed numerous audits of Virginia local governmental agencies and municipalities. Joel also has extensive experience providing tax consulting and preparation services at the federal and state levels for businesses, not-for-profit organizations, and individuals. 16| Joel Knopp, CPA (Continued) Engagement Manager Governmental, educational, and other entities served include the following: Counties Municipalities Special Districts and Authorities Broward* Altamonte Springs Barefoot Bay Recreation District Citrus* Casselberry* Central Florida Expressway Authority Lake* Coral Springs Early Learning Coalition of Flagler/Volusia Counties, Inc.* Osceola* Dunedin* East Central Florida Regional Planning Council* Seminole* Gulfport* Greater Orlando Aviation Authority* Northampton (VA)* Indian Rocks Beach Lake-Sumter Metropolitan Planning Organization* Kissimmee* MetroPlan Orlando* Leesburg* Miami-Dade Expressway Authority* Orlando* Sanford Airport Authority* Sanford* Eastern Shore Community Services Board (VA) * Tampa* Northwestern Regional Juvenile Detention Ctr. Commission (VA) Tarpon Springs Staunton Industrial Development Authority (VA) Temple Terrace Valley Community Services Board (VA) * Venice* Waynesboro Industrial Development Authority (VA) Staunton (VA) * Winchester Industrial Development Authority (VA) Town of Iron Gate (VA) Waynesboro (VA) * Winchester (VA) * Educational School District of Brevard County* School District of Escambia County* School District of Manatee County* School District of Osceola County* School District of Pasco County* School District of Seminole County* School District of Volusia County* Genesis Alternative Education Program (VA) Northampton County School Board (VA) Staunton City School Board (VA) Waynesboro City School Board (VA) Winchester City School Board (VA) *Indicates Single Audit included 17| Eddy Castaneda, CPA, MBA Engagement Supervisor Education and Certifications • B.S. Degree in Accounting, University of Central Florida • Masters of Business Administration in Accounting, Baker College • C.P.A., Certified Public Accountant – Florida Professional Memberships and Affiliations • Florida Government Finance Officers Association (FGFOA) • Florida Institute of Certified Public Accountants (FICPA) • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Listing of Relevant CPE Courses: 2010 – 2015 Governmental Update FGFOA Annual Conferences – 2010 – 2015 Ethics for CPAs: Accounting/Auditing Emphasis Clarity Standards Governmental Accounting, Reporting and Auditing Seminar – Texas Tech University Yellow Book GASB and GASB Standards Updates Fraud Waste and Abuse in Government GAQC 2015 Annual Update Governmental, educational, and other entities served include the following: Counties Municipalities Special Districts, Authorities and Associations Citrus* Apopka* Barefoot Bay Recreation District Lake* Casselberry* Early Learning Coalition of Flagler & Volusia Osceola* Cocoa Beach * East Central Florida Regional Planning Council Volusia* Coral Springs Greater Orlando Aviation Authority (GOAA) * Kissimmee* Lake-Sumter Metropolitan Planning Organization Leesburg* Lake-Sumter Emergency Medical Services Mount Dora* Miami-Dade Expressway Authority* Pembroke Pines MetroPlan Orlando* Sanford* Orlando/Orange County Convention & Visitors Bureau St. Cloud* North Brevard County Hospital District* Winter Park* TOHO Water Authority* Educational Florida A&M University Pembroke Pines Charter Schools School District of Volusia County* Background – Eddy Castaneda is a member of the Firm’s Govern- mental Practice Group. Eddy has over nine years of public accounting experience and has experience performing audits, examinations, reviews, and compli- ance work for governmental and not-for-profit entities. Professional Experience - Eddy has extensive experience performing governmental risk-based audits, examinations, reviews, internal/ operational audits, and compliance work for governmental entities. 18| Volney Jackson, CPA Engagement Senior Education and Certifications • B.S. Degree in Accounting, Montclair State University • C.P.A., Certified Public Accountant - Florida and New Jersey Professional Memberships and Affiliations • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) • Florida Institute of Certified Public Accountants (FICPA) • New Jersey Society of Certified Public Accountants Listing of Relevant CPE Courses for the Past Three Years: 2015 Cherry Bekaert Governmental Update Training Yellow Book Uniform Grant Guidance GASB 68 – Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions Spotting Fraud in a NFP, Government Environment Audit Efficiency - Government Internal Controls/COSO for Government and NFPs Spot the Error - Government Common Debt and Equity Instruments IT Security and HIPAA Update Compliance Supplement 2015 Update GASB Pension & Financial Reporting Governmental, educational, and other entities served include the following: Counties Municipalities Special Districts, Authorities and Associations Bergen, NJ West New Work, NJ Plainfield Municipal Utilities Authority, NJ City of Passaic, NJ Bergen County Utilities Authority, NJ Township of Washington, NJ North Bergen Municipal Utilities Authority, NJ Township of Wyckoff, NJ Borough of Alpine, NJ City of East Orange, NJ Educational Township of Montvale, NJ Passaic School, NJ Wayne Township, NJ East Orange School District, NJ Borough of Glen Rock, NJ Wyckoff, NJ Nutley, NJ School Board Plainfield, NJ Ridgefield Park, NJ Carteret, NJ *Indicates Single Audit included Background - Volney Jackson is a Senior at MSL and is a member of the Firm’s Middle Market and Senior Housing Practice Groups. She has over 10 years of public accounting experience and has experience performing audits and compliance work for Government and Non-for- Profit entities. Professional Experience - Volney has experience performing governmental risk-based audits and compliance work for governmental entities, HUD Compliance, and Health Care. Volney has completed over 40 hours of Continuing Professional Education (CPE) in the areas of governmental accounting and auditing annually for each of the past three years. 19| Client Reference List Please see the section below “Similar Engagements with Other Government Entities” on page 21 for a list client references and their contact information. Staff Quality and Continuity It has always been in the best interest of MSL and our clients to have staff return to an engagement. We recognize the importance of continuity to both the efficiency and effectiveness of the audit. We will strive to provide you continuity of staffing. Our turnover is significantly lower than average for firms of our size. Approximately 25% of our personnel have been with MSL for longer than ten years. PR I O R EN G A G E M E N T S PRIOR ENGAGEMENTS WITH THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 20| Prior Engagements with the City of South Miami MSL has performed no engagements with the City of South Miami within the last five years. SI M I L A R EN G A G E M E N T S SIMILAR ENGAGEMENTS WITH OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES 21| Similar Engagements with Other Government Entities Client Name Scope of Work Hours Engagement / Technical Review Shareholder Client Contact Name, Title Address Phone and Email City of Venice Annual Audit Single Audit 550 hours William Blend Dan O’Keefe Linda Senne, Interim Finance Director 401 W. Venice Ave., Venice, FL 34285 (941) 486-2626 lsenne@venicegov.com City of Dunedin Annual Audit Single Audit 650 hours William Blend Dan O’Keefe Joseph Ciurro, Finance Director 750 Milwaukee Ave., Dunedin, FL 34698 (727) 298-3066 jciurro@dunedinfl.net City of Leesburg Annual Audit Single Audit 600 hours William Blend Dan O’Keefe Bill Spinelli, Finance Director 501 W. Meadow St., Leesburg, FL 34749 (352) 728-9720 billspinelli@leesburgflorida.gov City of Sanford Annual Audit Single Audit 600 hours William Blend Dan O’Keefe Cynthia Lindsay, Director of Finance P.O. Box 1788, Sanford, FL 32771 (407) 246-2341 Cynthina.lindsay@sanfordfl.gov City of Casselberry Annual Audit Single Audit 500 hours William Blend Dan O’Keefe Rebecca Bowman, Finance Director 95 Triplet Lake Dr., Casselberry, FL 32707 (407) 262-7700 Rbowman@casselberry.org City of Altamonte Springs Annual Audit Single Audit 450 hours Dan O’Keefe William Blend Mark DeBord, Finance Director 225 Newburyport Ave., Altamonte Springs, FL 32701 (407) 571-8093 mbdebord@altamonte.org City of Indian Rocks Beach Annual Audit 250 hours Dan O’Keefe William Blend Dan Carpenter, Finance Director 1507 Bay Palm Blvd., Indian Rocks Beach, FL 33785 (727) 517-0204 dcarpenter@irbcity.com SP E C I F I C A U D I T AP P R O A C H SPECIFIC AUDIT APPROACH 22| Audit Approach Overview We have reviewed the City’s RFP, including the scope of services, in preparing our proposed audit plan. As part of our preparation, we have reviewed source documents, such as: the 2015 - 2016 City budget, the City’s prior financial statements, organizational charts, and other information that was available on the City’s website or Municode.com. The scope of our audit is directed primarily towards the expression of an opinion on the City’s basic financial statements. If it becomes evident that an unmodified opinion cannot be rendered on your financial statements, you will be promptly notified of the circumstances surrounding our findings. If, for any reason, we are unable to complete the audit or if we determine that we are unable to express an opinion, we will decline to express an opinion or may not issue a report as a result of the engagement, as required under the applicable professional standards. Standards-Based Audit Approach Overall, we will follow a standards-based audit approach, which is mandated under United States Auditing Standards Clarified (AU-C) Section 300. In our planning process, we will identify the risks of significant accounts and transactions related to the financial statements and plan our audit procedures to properly address those risks at the financial statement assertion level. In addition, we will incorporate AU-C Section 600 - Audits of Group Financial Statements, which relates to the audit approach and related documen- tation requirements for group audits. Under this standard, we are required to evaluate the City’s components, as well as business activities, to determine which aspects of the City’s activities are significant and need to be evaluated separately from a financial accounting and reporting perspective. Our general audit approach is illustrated on the following page. Proposed Segmentation of the Engagement The following section gives an overview of the major audit segments (Planning, Substantive Testing and Wrap Up), as well as procedures we anticipate will be implemented in these areas. This section is not intended to provide you with all of the details of our audit steps. It indicates our understanding of the City, the City’s Pension Plans and the Community Redevelopment Agency, their environment, and the related internal controls anticipated to be in place. The overall objective of our audit segmentation and related procedures is to ensure that our audit opinions are supported by the procedures performed. Procedures are evaluated throughout the audit process based upon the auditee’s environment, internal controls, and economic condition. In addition, our audit plan is evaluated throughout the audit and procedures are performed to address any significant issues identified during the audit process. 23| Planning – Internal Controls – Compliance Engagement Administration and Planning Evaluation of the City, Its Environment, and Internal Controls • Obtain and document our understanding of the City, its environment, its internal controls, organizational structure, and operating characteristics. • Evaluate organization, personnel, and financial practices. • Document existing electronic data processing (EDP) controls, and evaluate adequacy of the physical security environment, including business continuity (disaster recovery) planning. • Identify specific compliance requirements related to bond resolutions, ordinances, and Florida Statutes. • Perform testing of controls over areas deemed to have financial significance. These generally include testing of cash disbursements, cash receipts, journal entries, contracts, etc. Minutes, Contracts, and Resolutions • Evaluate financial reporting systems and administrative monitoring capabilities. Design preliminary tests on controls for compliance with prescribed systems. • Review minutes of meetings of the City Commission and prepare an abstract of information relevant to the audit of the financial statements. • Obtain data concerning outstanding contractual commitments, if any, for financial statement disclosure adequacy. • Design tests of controls for compliance with applicable laws and regulations and the Rules of the Auditor General of the State of Florida. • Develop a compliance work program and incorporate it into the overall audit plan. • Make preliminary assessments of the City, its environment, and its internal controls. • Update systems documentation and permanent file information. • Review status of the prior-year audit recommendations or findings, if any, and ascertain whether they were appropriately resolved. • Identify all federal and state financial awards programs, and evaluate if either a federal or state Single Audit is required (part of work plan, but do not anticipate any). • Document our understanding of all financially significant laws and regulations, and identify any new laws or regulations that require audit testing. • Identify new or modifications to the existing inter-local agreements. • Discuss with management the implementation of recent GASB pronouncements, and determine applicability of pending matters. 24| Planning – Internal Controls – Compliance (Cont.) Budgets • Document budgetary process and confirm compliance with applicable local ordinances, procedures, and regulations. • Review authorization and impact of interim budget amendments, if any. Substantive Testing Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Investments, including Restricted Funds • Ascertain that cash in the balance sheet is on hand, in transit, or on deposit with third parties (trustees) in the name of the City. • Ascertain that all cash funds of the City are included in the balance sheet. • Ascertain that depositories are legally acceptable, that adequate collateral has been pledged for the City’s deposits, and that separate depository accounts are maintained for each fund for which required. • Ascertain that the cash balances reflect a proper cutoff of receipts and disbursements and are stated at the correct amount. • Ascertain that cash balances are properly presented in accordance with related restrictions and disclosures are adequate. • Ascertain that investment balances are evidenced by securities or other appropriate legal documents, either physically on hand or held in safekeeping by others, and include all of the City’s investments. • Ascertain that investments are the types authorized by law, contract, and the investment policy of the City. • Ascertain that investment values, incomes, gains, or losses are correctly stated and properly allocated to accounts. • Ascertain that investments are properly described and classified by fund type in the combined balance sheet and related disclosures. Receivables, Due From, Revenue, and Cash Receipts • Ascertain that only earned revenues, if any, in the fiscal year have been recorded, and amounts uncollected at year-end presented as receivables are valid. Ascertain that the City has satisfied the relevant legal requirements to receive all revenues recorded. • Ascertain that the revenues were billed or charged and recorded at the correct amount and receivables are stated at the net realizable amount. • Ascertain that unbilled service revenues are appropriately reflected in the proper accounting period. • Ascertain that an adequate allowance for doubtful accounts has been established and that the related amounts and disclosures are properly presented in the financial statements. 25| Substantive Testing (Cont.) Property, Plant, Equipment, and Capital Expenditures • Ascertain that property and equipment represent a complete and valid listing of the capitalizable cost of assets purchased, constructed, or leased, and that they are physically on hand. • Ascertain that capital expenditures represent a complete and valid listing of the capitalizable cost of the property and equipment acquired during the period, and that capitalizable costs are excluded from repairs and maintenance and similar expenditure accounts. • Ascertain that the capitalized costs and related depreciation associated with all sold, abandoned, damaged, or obsolete fixed assets have been removed from the accounts. • Ascertain that depreciation charges on all depreciable assets have been computed on an acceptable and consistent basis and that the related allowance accounts are reasonable. • Ascertain that capital expenditures and fixed assets are properly classified and related disclosures are adequate. Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities, and Due to • Ascertain that recorded expenses and cash disbursements are for goods and services authorized and received. • Ascertain that expenses incurred for goods and services and related accounts payable have all been identified, including any contingent or contractual liabilities. • Ascertain that expenses for goods and services are authorized in accordance with the budget and other regulations or requirements. • Ascertain that payroll disbursements are made only for work authorized and performed by authorized personnel. • Ascertain that payroll is computed using rates and other factors in accordance with contracts and relevant laws and regulations. • Ascertain that expenses and related disburse- ments and liabilities have been correctly recorded as to account, budget category, period, and amount. • Ascertain that expenses and related liabilities are properly classified by budget category and related disclosures are adequate. • Ascertain that payroll and related liabilities are correctly recorded as to amount and period and properly distributed by account and budget category and disclosures are adequate. • Ascertain the status of employee compensatory benefits for accruals and disclosure. Non-current Liabilities and Debt Service Expenditures • Ascertain that debt is authorized and properly recorded. • Ascertain that all indebtedness of the City is identified, recorded, and disclosed. • Ascertain that the City has complied with provisions of indentures and agreements related to debt, including provisions on use of proceeds. • Ascertain that debt service expenditures (principal and interest payable) are properly recorded, classified, and disclosed. • Ascertain that debt and related restrictions, guarantees, and commitments are properly presented and related disclosures are adequate. • Review arbitrage calculations for reasonableness. 26| Substantive Testing (Cont.) Risk Management • Document and evaluate controls over the City’s risk management processes. • Review insurance coverage in place to ensure it is active and applicable for the City’s risk. • Ensure proper disclosures related to the City’s risk management activities. • Ascertain that cost allocation plans are in place for the proper allocation of insurance costs. Ensure that costs are allocated during the year and recorded correctly as to account, amount, and period, in accordance with the City’s plan, as well as applicable policies and procedures. Deferred Outflows and Inflows • Identify the nature and amounts of deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources. • Compare recorded deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources to the prior period or to other expectations. • Investigate any unexpected results, considering known changes in the government’s activities, economic conditions, or GAAP requirements. • Determine whether deferred inflows of resources, instead of revenue, have been reported when an asset has been recorded but the revenue does not meet the availability criterion. • Identify the nature and amounts of deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to debt, service concession arrangements, and pensions. • Compare recorded deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources to the prior period or to other expectations. Net Position and Fund Balance • Ascertain that all classifications of net position and fund balance are recorded and properly authorized in accordance with GASB. • Ascertain that components of net position and fund balance are determined in accordance with applicable regulations and requirements. • Ascertain that components of net position and fund balance, including changes in the net position, are properly computed and are described, classified, and appropriately disclosed. Revenues • Perform analytical procedures related to charges for services. • Design and perform a revenue test to determine that proper rates are charged. • Compare revenue data for the current period and historically to customer demographics. • Determine that impact fees are properly restricted and accounted for. • Perform testing of various tax and inter- governmental revenues. 27| Substantive Testing (Cont.) Expenditures and Expenses • Perform analytical procedures related to expenses. • Through testing and observation, determine that expenses are appropriate and properly classified. • Determine that expenses are properly classified for budgetary purposes. Pension and Other Post-Employment Benefit Plans (OPEB) • Evaluate the plan administrator of the plans and determine what controls we will evaluate at the administrator level. • Review the process for contributions, eligibility, and other areas at the employer level to ensure the plans are being properly administered at the employer level. • As much as possible, incorporate our evaluation of plan controls as part of our payroll control evaluation of the City. • Review allocation of pension expense. • Review pension plan funding amounts to ensure expenses and related liability, if any, are properly recorded. • Evaluate the OPEB plan and related controls. • Review OPEB plan information to ensure that the information reported is related and is properly reported in the financial statements. • Review the actuarial report related to the OPEB plan for consistency with plan information, and other information utilized to determine the OPEB liability and related disclosures. Grants • Evaluate and test controls over compliance requirements. • Ascertain status and resolution of prior-year findings and questioned costs. • Test grant revenue through confirmation with grantor agencies to ascertain appropriateness of classification. • Ascertain that grant revenues and expend- itures charged to grant programs are valid and complete and, if applicable, indirect costs are properly allocated. • Determine threshold for Type A and Type B programs based on grant expenditures. • Ascertain that grants are administered and revenues and expenditures are recorded in accordance with applicable provisions and related laws and regulations. • Ascertain that grant-related amounts are properly presented and related disclosures concerning restrictions and compliance are adequate. • Identify major federal programs and major state projects using risk-based approach. • Evaluate and test controls over direct and material compliance requirements. • Ascertain status and resolution of prior-year findings and questioned costs. 28| Wrap-Up and Reporting • Coordinate review of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis document for inclusion in the basic financial statements. • Complete all financial disclosure checklists. • Review status of prior-year audit recommendations and ascertain whether they were appropriately resolved. • Provide current-year audit findings and recommendations for improvement related to the financial statements, internal control, accounting, accounting systems, and compliance with policies and procedures. • Prepare preliminary drafts of audit reports, CAFR schedules and notes, and management letter. • Meet with management to review drafts prior to issuance. • Schedule and attend final meeting with manage- ment to finalize all financial reporting matters. • Present financial statements to management and the City Commission. Level of Staff to be Assigned to Each Proposed Segment of the Engagement for the City, Pension Plan and Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Audits The tables below show the applicable segment procedures for the City, the Pension Plans and the CRA. Included in the applicable tables are engagement staff level to be assigned to the applicable segment noted. City Audit - Proposed Segmentation Shareholder Manager / Supervisor Senior IT Specialist Staff Engagement Administration and Planning X X X X X Evaluation of Entity and Internal Controls X X X X X Minutes, Contracts, and Resolutions X X X Budget X X X Cash, Cash Equivalents, Investments X X X Receivables and Cash Receipts X X X PPE and Capital Expenditures X X X Accounts Payable & Other Liabilities X X X Payroll and Related Liabilities X X Long-Term Debt and Debt Service Expenditures X X X X Pension & OPEB X X X X Risk Management X X X X Net Position and Fund Balance X X X Revenues and Expenditures/Expenses X X X Grants X X X X Wrap-Up and Reporting X X X X Pension Plan Audits - Proposed Segmentation Shareholder Manager / Supervisor Senior Staff Engagement Administration and Planning X X X X Evaluation of Entity and Internal Controls X X X X Minutes, Contracts, and Resolutions X X X Cash, Cash Equivalents, Investments X X X Receivables and Plan Contributions X X X Accounts Payable & Benefit Payments X X X Net Position X X X Wrap-Up and Reporting X X X X 29| CRA Audit - Proposed Segmentation Shareholder Manager / Supervisor Senior Staff Engagement Administration and Planning X X X X Evaluation of Entity and Internal Controls X X X X Minutes, Contracts, and Resolutions X X X Budget X X X Cash, Cash Equivalents, Investments X X X Receivables and Cash Receipts X X X PPE and Capital Expenditures X X X Accounts Payable & Other Liabilities X X X Long-Term Debt and Debt Service Expenditures X X X X Net Position and Fund Balance X X X Revenues and Expenditures/Expenses X X X Wrap-Up and Reporting X X X X Samples Size and the Extent to Which Statistical Sampling is to be Used in the Engagement We will follow the guidance of AU-C section 530, Audit Sampling, in using a non-statistical approach. MSL uses this guidance, along with our professional judgment, to develop a logical process that includes assessing inherent risk, control risk, and combined audit risk, to determine where sampling is deemed appropriate and effective, as well as in the determination of sample sizes. Sample sizes will vary, depending on the nature of the testing (compliance versus substantive), and the size of the population being sampled. Our utilization of sampling generally centers on compliance and controls testing, rather than substantive testing of account balances. Sample sizes for compliance and controls testing are based upon professional guidance. Audit sampling is the application of an audit procedure to less than 100% of the items within an account balance or class of transactions for the purpose of evaluating some characteristic of the balance or class. Our auditors use extensive sampling procedures to obtain satisfactory audit evidence. Sampling procedures routinely include statistical and non-statistical sampling based upon: • the overall objective of the test • the nature of the sample population • the sample size • the nature of the item(s) being examined • the anticipated outcome of the sample results • the significance of the results Ordinarily, the significant portions of the sampling expected to be performed are identified at the onset of the engagement and are coordinated with the remaining auditing procedures to produce timely and efficient results. 30| We currently expect to perform the following types of sampling: Attribute Sampling - To test the rate of deviation from a prescribed internal control procedure to determine whether planned reliance on that control is appropriate. In addition to tests of compliance with prescribed control procedures, attribute sampling will be used for certain substantive procedures to test for possible unrecorded transactions and for testing existing account balances. Variable Sampling - To reach a conclusion about the adequacy or reasonableness of an account balance. Examples of areas where we will apply sampling strategies include: • The selection of cash receipts postings to test for determination of compliance with related statutory requirements and utility rate schedules • CRA transactions • The selection of debt payment transactions to test for timeliness of, and completeness of, payments to paying agents for debt costs and fiscal agent fees • The selection of cash disbursements and payroll transactions for compliance testing • Journal entries • The selection of other transactions to determine compliance with laws and regulations Extent to Use of EDP Software in the Engagement Innovative Technology – Computer-Assisted Audit Techniques (CAATs) To the extent possible, it is our policy to incorporate the use of CAATs in all phases of our audit. Our Firm understands the efficiencies and effectiveness derived with the proper use of these audit techniques. We have committed significant Firm resources to provide your audit team with the tools and training to use these techniques. Our Firm uses IDEA data-mining software. This software enables us to take virtually any output file format from your financial reporting package and convert it into a usable data format for our staff to perform CAATs, such as: • Comparison of employee and vendor addresses to identify employees who are also vendors, • Analyzing numerical sequences from large populations to identify missing or duplicate checks or invoices, • Sorting payments to identify transactions that fall just under financial control or contract limits, • Unexpected trends in the number of, or amounts of, payments to vendors, and • Search for false employees by comparing the human resources database with the payroll system database. All software utilized by our staff for sampling will be used exclusively on our own computer hardware brought on-site during the audit. We do not, and will not, install or use any of our proprietary software systems on your hardware systems. Electronic Data Processing Techniques and the Paperless Audit As part of our audit, we routinely perform analyses of our clients’ computer-based financial management systems. To the extent possible, it is our policy to design our audit procedures to maximize the application of computer-assisted audit procedures for compliance and substantive testing of your system. We also utilize the capabilities of our own in-house computer systems to assist us in achieving efficiency in examining your financial accounting and reporting systems. 31| We also have the inherent capability to download certain financial data into our own data processing systems. This procedure is typically limited to specific applications where it is feasible to do so. Quite often, our clients’ systems do not provide the ability to download all historical data that we find essential to perform our analytical procedures and account comparisons. When that occurs, alternative procedures are employed to build the appropriate database to perform these necessary tasks. As a routine part of your audit, we will request electronic copies of your financial system’s database files to allow us access to information in your financial accounting systems. Our Firm uses financial data extraction and analysis software to assist us in performing your audit. As a primary audit tool, we utilize this software to read, display, analyze, manipulate, sample, or extract data files from almost any source within your financial management systems -- mainframe to PC, including reports printed to a file. Type and Extent of Analytical Procedures to be Used in the Engagement Analytical procedures are utilized in the planning, substantive testing, and wrap-up phases of all audits. The extent to which they are utilized is dependent upon our assessment of where the significant audit risks are. In the planning stage, analytical testing is used as one of many methods to determine “what has happened” during the audit period. Generally, we will utilize comparisons to prior-year activities. In addition, to make the information useful in the planning stages, we implement this process on the financial statement level to give us an overall assessment of changes that have occurred. During the substantive testing phase of the engagement, we generally utilize analytical procedures on revenue and expenditure/expense accounts, including, when appropriate, comparisons to prior year, as well as to budget. We utilize analytical procedures, when reasonable, to compare to operational information. For example, comparing water production to related revenues and expenses with direct or inverse relation- ships. In the wrap-up phase of the audit, analytical testing is used to support the testing performed throughout the audit, as well as to determine that no significant changes occurred outside of our expectations. The full extent to which analytical procedures are utilized is based upon the auditor’s professional judgment and the overall risk assessment results. Substantive procedures include records examination (inspection), confirmation, observation, verification, inquiry, and analytical procedures, all of which have been discussed above. The extent to which any procedure is utilized is determined based upon the auditor’s evaluation of the account balance or transaction being evaluated. The best method utilized is dependent upon the auditor’s risk assessment of the specific accounting or reporting issue at hand. Which procedures are utilized is carefully evaluated throughout the audit process and often more than one of these procedures is implemented. In all cases, the audit team discusses the approach to be taken and evaluates this decision during the audit process to ensure that the testing performed will provide a reasonable basis for the auditor’s conclusions. 32| Approach to be Taken to Gain and Document an Understanding of the City’s Internal Control Structure Audit standards require us to gain an understanding of the City, its environment, and its internal controls in order for us to properly plan our audit to address audit risk at the financial statement assertion level. While the requirement to gain an understanding of the client, its environment, and its internal controls is the same on every engagement, the factors affecting this information and the procedures performed to gain this understanding are not the same for all engagements. The objective in gaining this understanding is to identify types of potential misstatements, consider factors that affect the risk of material misstatement, and design tests of controls, when applicable, as well as substantive procedures. We anticipate evaluation of controls over the following significant areas: • Cash and investments • Debt • Cash receipts • Accounts and grants receivable • Financial reporting • Cash disbursements • Capital assets • Grants • Payroll • Payables and accrued liabilities • Pensions and OPEB • Monitoring and risk assessment on an entity-wide level • Other areas will be evaluated, as deemed necessary Procedures performed in our initial assessment will include examination of the applicable documentation (including policies and procedures), contracts, debt agreements, and other documentation necessary to gain an understanding of the significant accounting and reporting controls in place, as well as our expectations of what controls should be in place. Once, an understanding has been gained, we will perform walkthroughs of the controls documented and make inquiries of staff. The scope of testing performed on controls will be determined based upon our evaluation of both inherent and control risk, along with our consideration of materiality (qualitative and quantitative) at both the financial statement and account balance level. This evaluation will be completed during the planning phase of the audit. The results of our assessment will determine the extent to which we will test controls, as well as the nature, timing, and extent of substantive audit procedures to be performed. Approach to Determining Laws and Regulations that will be Subject to Audit Test Work A key component in auditing any governmental entity is to determine those laws, regulations, and contracts that have a significant impact on the financial statements. Our audit approach in this area involves: • Review of enabling legislation • Review of federal and state laws • Review of prior financial statements • Review of grant agreements • Inquiry of management and staff • Review of contracts and other agreements Once significant laws and regulations that affect the City have been identified, we will develop compliance testing to ensure that we address these issues. 33| Areas currently identified as significant compliance areas are as follows: • Debt covenants • Other significant agreements • City’s investment policy • Federal and state grants • Pension Plan requirements • Federal tax and wage reporting Approach to be Taken in Drawing Audit Samples for Purposes of Tests of Compliance Our auditors use sampling procedures to obtain satisfactory audit evidence. In developing our methods for sampling, we utilize the methodology referenced in AU-C Sections 315, 330, and 530. Those sampling procedures routinely include statistical and non-statistical sampling based upon sample population, nature of the items being sampled, the required sample size, and the anticipated results. Ordinarily, the significant portions of the sampling expected to be performed are identified at the onset of the engagement and are coordinated with the remaining auditing procedures to produce timely and efficient results. We currently anticipate utilizing both attribute and variable sampling. Examples of areas where we will apply sampling strategies include: • the selection of cash receipts postings to test for determination of compliance with related statutory requirements and utility rate schedules; • the selection of cash disbursements and payroll transactions for compliance testing; • the selection of debt payment transactions to test for timeliness and completeness of payments to paying agents for debt costs and fiscal agent fees; and • the selection of other transactions to determine compliance with laws and regulations. PO T E N T I A L A U D I T PR O B L E M S IDENTIFICATION OF ANTICIPATED POTENTIAL AUDIT PROBLEMS 34| Identification of Anticipated Potential Audit Problems Based on our review of the City’s prior-year CAFR and other information we have obtained, we do not anticipate any specific audit problems. However, the public sector is highly regulated, and there are new laws, regulations, standards, and pronouncements coming out on a regular basis. As these changes become known, we will evaluate their impact on the City’s financial statements and the effect they might have on the scope of our engagement. Members of your audit team have been auditing Florida governments for over a quarter of a century. They are accustomed to change and understand how to deal with it. As your auditors, we will gain an understanding of the issues at hand, communicate with you, and help resolve them to our mutual satisfaction. There are several new government accounting standards becoming effective over the next few years. MSL will be able to support your staff and help guide them through the appropriate reporting of these new standards. Our direct relationship with the standard setters will help ensure that we provide appropriate guidance in the implementation of these new standards. Therefore, we do not anticipate this resulting in any audit problems, as your audit team will be fully aware of and trained in the applicable accounting requirements. Our philosophy, when it comes to new rules, is that you, the client, and we, the auditors, are on the same page. We believe in working with our clients to obtain all the necessary facts to ensure the correct decisions are made. We share a common goal: to make certain that the City’s financial reporting is in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles and federal and regulatory requirements. As a Firm highly staffed with governmental professionals, we are confident that we are prepared to overcome any challenges that may arise during the course of our relationship. At MSL, we pride ourselves on being highly involved in our profession. As you saw in our engagement team members’ résumés, we are actively involved in local and national professional organizations. Beyond our commitment to give back to our profession, this involvement enables all of our staff to be aware of all the issues that face our governmental clients. We encourage our clients, whenever possible, to early implement accounting standards. Our goal is to work with our clients to ensure that the implementation process goes smoothly and that the implementation is in accordance with the applicable standards. We provide support and information to our clients. One way this is accomplished is at our free, annual governmental training session held in the summer, where all of our clients can come and discuss the accounting issues that face us all. RE Q U I R E D F O R M S REQUIRED FORMS 35| Required Forms Proof of Professional Liability Insurance 36| Proof of Liability Insurance Note: If MSL is awarded the contract, we will conform to all of the City’s insurance requirements and will add the City as an Additional Insured to our policies. 37| Public Entity Crimes and Conflicts of Interest Affidavit 38| Public Entity Crimes and Conflicts of Interest Affidavit (Page 2) 39| Public Entity Crimes and Conflicts of Interest Affidavit (Page 3) 40| Drug Free Workplace Form 41| No Conflict of Interest / Non-Collusion Affidavit 42| No Conflict of Interest / Non-Collusion Affidavit (Page 2) 43| Acknowledgement of Conformance with OSHA Standards 44| Related Party Transaction Verification 45| Related Party Transaction Verification (Page 2) 46| Related Party Transaction Verification (Page 3) 47| Affidavit Concerning Federal and State Vendor Listings 48| Affidavit Concerning Federal and State Vendor Listings (Page 2) 49| Presentation Team Declaration AD D I T I O N A L IN F O R M A T I O N ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 50| Additional Information Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Our experience in working with clients who have participated in the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting program is, we believe, second to none. The following (from the 2014 program results, as posted on the Government Finance Officers Association website) are clients who participate in the program, and with whom we have worked during the past few years: MSL has the capability and experience to assist the City in continuing to receive the GFOA Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting. We will ensure throughout the engagement that the City keeps current with any new accounting and reporting standards issued by the GASB. This will help to make certain that the City continues receiving the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting. MSL Governmental Clients Municipalities Municipalities (Cont.) Special Districts and Authorities Altamonte Springs Leesburg Central Florida Expressway Authority Apopka Orlando Greater Orlando Aviation Authority (GOAA) Casselberry Pembroke Pines Miami-Dade Expressway Authority Cocoa Beach Sanford Tohopekaliga Water Authority Dunedin Tampa Fort Lauderdale Venice Indian Rocks Beach Winter Park Kissimmee School Districts Counties Brevard County Broward Escambia County Citrus Osceola County Lake Pasco County Osceola Seminole County Seminole Volusia County 51| External Quality Control Review Quality control in any CPA firm can never be taken for granted. It requires a continuing commitment to professional excellence. We are formally dedicated to that commitment. Our Firm recognizes the long-term significance of developing a formal quality control program. In an effort to continue to maintain the standards of working excellence required by our Firm, we are members of the Private Companies Practice Section (PCPS), the Center for Audit Quality (CAQ), and the Governmental Audit Quality Center (GAQC) of the AICPA. To be a participating member firm, you must obtain an independent compliance review of your firm’s quality control policies and procedures every three years to ascertain compliance with existing auditing standards on the applicable engagements. The scope of the peer review is comprehensive, in that, it specifically reviews the quality control policies and procedures of the participating firm’s accounting and auditing practice, including its work product in various client industries. We believe that our commitment to the program has been rewarding not only to our Firm, but primarily to our clients. The external, independent peer review of the elements of our quality control policies and procedures performed by an independent certified public accountant selected by the AICPA provides both us and our clients with the assurance that we continue to conform to the standards of the profession in the conduct of our accounting and auditing practice. Our Firm has undergone successful peer reviews since participation in the program. We take quality control seriously. We understand our responsibility in providing you with auditing services that meet or exceed the professional standards established by the AICPA, U.S. GAO, U.S. OMB, Florida Attorney General, and Florida Board of Accountancy. On the following page is our most recent peer review report for the period ended June 30, 2014, which included a review of specific governmental engagements performed by MSL. It should be noted that no comments were made as a result of this review. 52| PR I C E P R O P O S A L PRICE PROPOSAL 53| Price Proposal Sheet