Res No 125-17-14926RESOLUTION NO. 125-17-14926
A Resolution pursuant to Section 20-3.5(D)(1) and other applicable
provisions of the South Miami Land Development Code approving an
increase from two stories to three stories for a Mixed-Use Project on the
East Madison Square property as legally described herein.
WHEREAS, the South Miami Community RedeveloEment Agency (SMCRA) owns several
parcels on the south side ofSW 64th Street and east ofSW 59 Place, as follows: 5944 SW 64th Street
(folio 09-4025-010-0270), 6401 SW 59th Place (folio 09-4025-010-0280), 6411 SW 59 th Place (folio 09-
4025-010-0290),6415 SW 59th Place (folio 9-4025-010-0300), 6443 SW 59th Place (folio 09-4025-010-
0320) and a vacant lot with folio number 09-4025-010-0310) (collectively referred to as "East Madison
Square"); and
WHEREAS, the parcels are all zoned "SR" Specialty Retail that a small strip of 5944 SW 64th
Street is SR with the Community Service Overlay; and
WHEREAS, the SR district allows a maximum building height of four (4) stories or fifty (50)
feet pursuant to Section 20-3.5G ofthe Land Development Code (LDC); and
WHEREAS, LDC Section 20-3.5(D) provides that, if a property is abutting a single-family
zoning district the maximum height of any new building on that property is limited to two stories,
however, additional height may be obtained via the special use process set forth in Section 20-5.8; and
WHEREAS, the City of South Miami has submitted application PB-17 -010 requesting a special
use approval to develop a three (3) story, mixed-use project on the site; and
WHEREAS, adjacent to the site on the north, south and east are single-family residential"
districts; and
WHEREAS, Section 20-3.5(D)(1) stipulates that additional project height may be obtained via
the special use permit process as set forth in Section 20-5.8, the pertinent parts of which are as follows:
20-5.8 Special use approvals.
(B)Required Conditions.
(1) Prior to approving a special use, the city commission shall find that such use meets the
conditional requirements set forth in Section 20-3.4 and that it
(a) Will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the
vicinity of the proposed use;
(b) Will not be detrimental to the public welfare or property or improvements in the
neighborhood; and
(c) Complies with all other applicable Code provisions.
(2) Additional Conditions. The city commission may designate such additional conditions in
connection with a special use as will, in its opinion, assure that such use will conform to
the foregoing requirements.
WHEREAS, Section 20-3.4 sets forth general requirements for special use approvals as well as
special requirements for specific types of uses; and
WHEREAS, the general requirements of Section 20-3.4 are as follows:
Res. No. 125-17-14926
(1) All such uses shall comply with all requirements established in the appropriate zoning district,
unless additional or more restrictive requirements are set forth below or by the City
Commission.
(2) All such uses shall be determined to be of a compatible and complementary nature with any
existing, planned or anticipated surrounding uses.
(3) A public hearing shall be held by the City Commission to determine the overall compatibility
of the use with the surrounding neighborhood.
(4) If a special use is, in the future, determined by the Director of the Planning and Zoning
Department or the City Commission, to be adversely affecting the health, safety or welfare,
including quiet enjoyment, of persons residing or working in the vicinity of the proposed use,
or otherwise to be detrimental to the public welfare or property or improvements in the
surrounding neighborhood, or to be not in compliance with any other applicable Code
provisions, the special use approval may be modified, with conditions of approval revised or
added to alleviate such adverse effect, or revoked by the City Commission upon notification
and public hearing.
WHEREAS, Section 20-3.4 does not provide any specific requirements for a Special Use approval
pertaining to an increase in the number of stories; and
WHEREAS, Section 20-5.8(C) of the LDC provides that an approval shall lapse after six (6)
months ifno master building permit which implements the Special Use has been issued for such use. The
City Commission may specify a longer approval period for good cause; and
WHEREAS, the Special Use review process requires a recommendation from the Planning Board
and the approval of the City Commission after a public hearing; and
WHEREAS, at the May 30, 2017 special meeting, the Planning Board following a public hearing,
voted to recommend approval application PB-17-0l0 by a vote of five (5) ayes, one (1) nay; with two
conditions: (1) that the project be limited to three (3) stories; and (2) that the site be developed in substantial
compliance with the plans prepared by Fanjul & Associates, LLC and attached hereto as "Exhibit A"; and
WHEREAS, staff and the Planning Board also recommend that the approval period be extended
beyond six (6) months.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA THAT:
Section 1: Application PB-17-010 submitted by the applicant, the South Miami Community
Redevelopment Agency (SMCRA), for review and approval of a third floor of development for the East
Madison Square mixed use development project, pursuant to Section 20-3.5(D)(1) of the land development
code, is hereby approved with two conditions: (1) that the project be limited to three (3) stories; and (2) that
the site be developed in substantial compliance with the plans prepared by Fanjul & Associates, LLC and
attached hereto as "Exhibit A", unless amended with approval ofthe City Commission and the SMCRA by
written resolution.
Section 2: The City Commission, finding that good cause exists for extending the time of the
Special Use approval and hereby grants an additional six months to obtain the master building permit.
2
Res. No. 125-17-14926
Therefore, the Special Use shall lapse after one (1) year if no master building permit which implements
the Special Use has been issued for such use.
Section 3: This resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6 th , day of June
ATTEST:
3
,2017.
APPROVED:
jl!tI!f~
Commission Vote: 4-1
Mayor Stoddard: Yea
Vice Mayor Welsh: Yea
Commissioner Edmond: Yea
Commissioner Harris: Yea
Commissioner Liebman: Nay
THE CITY OF PLEASANT LIVING
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
To: The Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Commission
VIA: Steven Alexander, City Manager
FROM: Jane K. Tompkins, AICP, Planning Director
Date: June 6, 2017
SUBJECT:
1. A Resolution pursuant to Section 20-3.5(D)(1) and other applicable provisions
of the City of South Miami Land Development Code approving an increase from two
stories to four stories for a Mixed-Use Project on the West Madison Square property
as legally described herein.
I ~
2. A Resolution relating to a request for a variance from Section 20-4.4 and other
applicable provisions of the City of South Miami Land Development Code to allow a
reduction in the number of parking spaces provided for a Mixed-Use Project on the West
Madison Square property as legally described herein.
3. A Resolution approving a Unity of Title for the Properties Located at 5978 SW 64 tb
Street (folio 09-4025-010-0010), 6415 SW 60 tb Avenue (folio 09-4025-010-0030),6429 SW
60 tb Avenue (folio 09-4025-010-0040), 6442 SW 59tb Place (folio 09-4025-010-0180), 6420
SW 59 tb Place (folio 09-4025-010-0160), and vacant lots with the following folio numbers:
09-4025-010-0050, ~9-4025-010-0020, 09-4025-010-0140, and 09-4025-010-0170.
BACKGROUND:
The South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency (eRA) owns approximately 1.2 acres of
property on the south side of SW 64th Street generally referred to as Madison Square. The
CRA's planning document designates the area for a mixed-use redevelopment proposal that will
create an anchor for the north end of SW 59 th Place and help stimulate revitalization efforts in
the area.
For the purposes of the development review, the property is described as either East or West
Madison Square, with SW 59 th Place serving as the divider. This memo is focused on the zoning
requests for West Madison Square; the East Madison Square requests are addressed in a
separate memo. The West property consists of nine (9) parcels on the south side of SW 64th
Street between SW 59 th Place and SW 60th Avenue as shown in the highlighted area below:
Madison Square -West Parcel
Special Use and Variance Applications
S978 SW 64 Street
June 6, 2017
Page 2 of 9
Subject Property located 5978 SW 64 Street
The properties total 32,019 square feet in size (net) and are identified on the City's maps as:
5978 SW 64th Street, 6415 SW 60th Place, 6429 SW 60 th Avenue, 6443 SW 60 th Avenue1, 6442
SW 59th Place, and four vacant parcels that have not been assigned a street number2. The
project does not include the privately owned, irregularly shaped parcel at 6412 SW 59 th Place.
All the parcels are zoned "SR" Specialty Retail except for 6443 SW 60 th Avenue, which is zoned
"RS-4" Single-Family. The City's Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designates all the parcels as
"Mixed-Use Commercial Residential (Four-Story)".
I The Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser's website does not list an address for this parcel.
2 The Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser's website identifies the vacant parcel immediately south of6412 SW
59 th Place as 6420 SW 59 th Place .
JKT
Z:\Commission Items\2017\06-06-2017\Madison Square West\Madison Square West CM Memo 06062017 .docx
Madison Square -West Parcel
Special Use and Variance Applications
5978 SW 64 Street
June 6, 2017
Page 3 of 9
~ J • .;;;;;-____________ -
~ 11
6400
..-
"<t a
CD •
5978
6415
6429
6443
6457
6487
r-SR -
----.---
6442
6450
0>
01
~ a
-
Zoning Map Excerpt Future Land Use Map Excerpt
Surrounding land uses, zoning and FLUM designations are as follows:
Single-family
and vacant
Vacant
Vacant
* Community Service Overlay
RS-4 and SR
SR
RS-4
Single-Family Residential
(Two-Story) and Mixed-Use
Commercial Residential
(Four-Sto
Single-Family (Two-Story)
Single-Family Residential
The City of South Miami is proposing a mixed-use project for Madison Square. The West property
will consist of approximately 8,868 square feet of commercial space on the ground floor and
twenty (20) residential units on the second and third floors (ten units per floor). The proposed
uses are permitted in the SR district (see Land Development Code (LDC) Sec. 20-3.3(D)).
The residential component will be developed as affordable units pursuant to an agreement
between the CRA and the developer. A single retail tenant is expected to occupy the commercial
space.
As currently designed, forty-one (41) parking spaces will be available on-site . Pursuant to Section
20-4.4 of the LDC, fourteen (14) on-street spaces can be credited to the project for a total offifty-
five (55) spaces.
JKT
Z:\Comm ission Items\2017\06-06-2017\Madison Square West\Madison Square We st CM Memo 06062017.docx
Madison Square -West Parcel
Special Use and Variance Applications
5978 SW 64 Street
June 6,2017
Pase40f9
A landscape buffer separates the parking lot from the single-family residence to the south. The
site plan complies with the setback, FAR and impervious coverage standards of the LDC.
The attached exhibit contains the plans for both the East and West properties. Sheet AO.l
illustrates the concept plan for both the East and the West properties; Sheets AO.l(W), A.l.l,
A1.2.3 and Al.l.3 provides the site plan, floor lay-out for the second and third floors, and
conceptual elevations for the West side.
REQUESTS:
As proposed, the project requires the following approvals, which are described and analyzed
below:
1. A SpeCial Use to allow a height of three-stories.
2. A Variance to allow a reduction in the number of parking spaces provided.
3. A Unity of Title
ANALYSIS:
1. A Special Use to allow a height of three-stories.
The SR zoning district allows a height of four stories or fifty (50) feet. This provision is limited,
however, by Section 20-3.5(0) Properties Abutting Single-Family Zoning Districts of the land
Development Code which states:
(1) Notwithstanding the dimensional requirements of the zoning use district in which a
property is located, if that property is abutting (common border or separated by a right-
of-way) to a single-family zoning district the maximum height of any new building or any
vertical addition to an existing building on that property is limited to two stories,
however, additional height may be obtained via the special use permit process as set
forth in Section 20-5.8.
As noted above, the project abuts a single-family zoning district on three sides (north, west and
south) and is designed at three (3) stories in height.
Special Use applications are controlled by LDC Section 20-5.8 Special use approvals, as follows:
Section 20-5.8 (B) Required Conditions
JKT
(1) Prior to approving a special use, the city commission shall find that such use meets the
conditional requirements set forth in Section 20-3.4 and that it:
(a) Will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the
vicinity of the proposed use;
Z:\COmmlssion ltems\2017\06-06-2017\Madlson Square West\Madlson Square west eM Memo 06062017.docx
Madison Square -West Parcel
Special Use and Variance Applications
5978 SW 64 Street
·June 6,2017
PageS of9
(b) Will not be detrimental to the public welfare or property or improvements in the
neighborhood; and
(c) Complies with all other applicable Code provisions.
(2) Additional Conditions. The city commission may designate such additional conditions in
connection with a special use as will, in its opinion, assure that such use will conform to
the foregoing requirements.
The conditional requirements of Section 20-3.4 include general requirements that apply to all
applications as well as special requirements that apply to specific types of special uses. There
are no special requirements for allowing additional stories, so only the general requirements
apply: .
Section 20-3.4 Special use conditions.
(A) General Requirements
(1) All such uses shall comply with all requirements established in the appropriate zone use
district, unless additional or more restrictive requirements are set forth below or by the City
Commission.
(2) All such uses shall be determined to be of a compatible and complementary nature with
any existing, planned or anticipated surrounding uses.
(3) A public hearing shall be held by the City Commission to determine the overall compatibility
of the use with the surrounding neighborhood.
(4) If a special use is, in the future, determined by the Director of the Planning and Zoning
Department or the City Commission, to be adversely affecting the health, safety or welfare,
including quiet enjoyment, of persons residing or working in the vicinity of the proposed use, or
otherwise to be detrimental to the public welfare or property or improvements in the
surrounding neighborhood, or to be not in compliance with any other applicable Code
provisions, the special use approval may be modified, with conditions of approval revised or
added to alleviate such adverse effect, or revoked by the City Commission upon notification and
public hearing.
STAFF REsPONSE:
After review of the project, the proposed building complies with conditions and requirements
listed in both Section 20-5.8(8) and 20-3.4(A) of the LDC in that:
* Increasing the height of the building from two stories to three should not adversely
affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the area, nor will it be detrimental
to the public welfare or property or improvements in the neighborhood;
* The proposed building complies with other applicable Code provisions regarding size
and setbacks;
* While most buildings in the area are single-story, the nearby churches have elements or
architectural features that are comparable in height to the proposed building;
JKT
Z:\Commission Items\2011\06-06-2011\Madison Square West\Madison Square West eM Memo 06062017.docx
Madison Square -west Parcel
Special Use and Variance Applications
5978 SW 64 Street
June 6, 2017
Page6of9
• The site is designed to maximize the separation between the building and the single-
family residence to the south; and
* The proposed ~uilding is of a compatible and complementary nature with the existing,
planned or anticipated surrounding uses.
Section 20-5.8(C) Expiration of Special Use Approvals further provides that an approval shall
lapse after six (6) months if no master building permit which implements the special use has
been issued for such use. The City Commission may specify a longer approval period for good
cause.
PlANNING BoARD ACTION:
Following a public hearing on the item on May 30,2017, the Planning Board voted five (5) ayes
to one (1) nay to recommend approval of the special use with staWs recommended conditions:
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the ety Commission approve the special use application with the
following conditions:
1. That the building be limited to three (3) stories in height; and
2. That the project is developed in substantial compliance with the plans prepared by Fanjul
& Associates, LLC and attached to this memo.
Further, Staff recommends that the City Commission consider a longer approval period to ensure
the developer has adequate time to obtain the master building permit.
2. Variance to allow a reduction in the number of parking spaces provided.
The proposed project consists of approximately 8,868 sf of commercial space and twenty (20)
housing units. Based on this design, a total of seventy-two (72) parking spaces are required per
Section 20-4.4 of the LOC: .
Retail Parkilll! Spaces Required
8,868 S...Ji!.: 1 Parking Space .
1 x 300 £../l; R:I 30 Parkmg Spaces
Plus
JKT
Z:\Commission ftems\2017\06-06-2017\Madison Square West\Madison Square West eM Memo 06062017.docx
Madison Square -West Parcel
Special Use and Variance Appllcatfons
5978 SW 64 Street
June 6,2017
Page 7 of9
Residential Parking Spaces Required
20 wHtB 2 Parking Space
1 x l::J.RK ~ 40 Parking Spaces
Plus
20 wHts-1 Visitor Parking Space
1 x 10 YfNt5 ~ 2 Visitor Parking Spaces
TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: 30 + 40 + 2 = 72
Fifty-five (55) spaces are shown on the proposed design, for a shortage of seventeen (17) spaces.
Of the fifty-five (55) spaces available, twenty-two (22) will be allocated for the residential units
(i.e., one space per unit plus two visitor spaces); the remaining thirty-three (33) spaces will be
allocated for the commercial space. The City and CRA are negotiating with the nearby churches
to provide additional parking for the project. However, since the negotiations have not been
finalized, a variance approval is necessary.
Pursuant to Section 20-5.9 of the LDC, a variance for off-street parking can be reviewed and
permitted by the City Commission at a public hearing, after a recommendation by the Planning
Board. Variance decisions shall be based on an affirmative finding as to each of the follOWing
criterion:
JKT
1. The variance is necessary to relieve particular extraordinary conditions relating to a
specific property;
Response: The site's small size, dimensions, and irregular shape, combined with the three
street frontages and a single-family residence to the south make this a particularly
challenging site to develop.
z. Denial of the variance would result in hardship to the owner. Hardship results if the
restriction of the zoning ordinance, when applied to a particular property, becomes
arbitrary, confiscatory or unduly oppressive because of conditions of the property that
distinguish it from other properties under similar zoning restrictions;
Response: Development of the property is limited by its size, dimensions and irregular
shape, code requirements that limit height and impefYious coverage, and the setbacks
required from the single-family residence. These factors combine to make it difficult to
comply with the parking requirements. Further, denial of the variance will impede the
developmen~ of much needed affordable housing for South Miami' and a commercial
tenant that will offer essential goods within walking distance of many residents.
Z:\Commission Items\2011\06-06-2017\Madison Square West\Madison Square West eM Memo 06062017.docx
Madison Square -West Parcel
Special Use and Variance Applications
5978 SW 64 Street
June 6,2017
Page 8 of9
3. The extraordinary conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the
applicant;
Response: The neighborhood was platted with small, narrow lots that make it difficult to
assemble sites large enough to accommodate a mixed-use development that complies
with all the current LDC requirements and meets the community's development
objectives. Consequently, the extraordinary conditions and circumstances do not result
from the actions of the applicant.
4. The requested variance is the minimum variance necessary to make possible the
reasonable use of the land, building or structure;
Response: The project is designed to accommodate the space needs of a national retailer
and the community's desire to provide as many affordable units as possible, while still
being sensitive to the scale of the surrounding neighborhood and limiting impacts on the
adjacent single family homes. While a parking structure might allow additional parking,
it's unlikely that a structure would fit on the property3. Further, if a structure was
physically possible, the building would be disproportionate and out of keeping with the
character of the neighborhood. Consequently, the requested variance is the minimum
necessary to make possible the reasonable use of the land.
S. That the approval of the variance will be consistent with the general intent and purpose
of the Land Development Code, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or
otherwise detrimental to the public welfare.
Response: The purpose of the SR district is lito maintain the basic specialty retail character
of the Sunset Drive commercial area by encouraging comparison retail uses at the
pedestrian-oriented grade level and office and residential uses on the upper floors of all
buildings" (Sec. 20-3.1(14)). All other properties with an SR designation are in the
Hometown District Overlay and, as such, are allowed a twenty-five percent (25%) parking
reduction for mixed-use buildings. Such reductions are typical for mixed-use buildings. If
that reduction were applied to this project, only fifty-four (54) spaces would be required
and the project would comply. Consequently, approval of the variance will be consistent
with the general intent and purpose of the LDC and will not be injurious to the
neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare.
3 For additional information about the sizing requirements of parking structures, please refer to :
http ://www .tirnhaahs .com/parkingdatabase/what-are-some-typical-standards-for-parking-garage-functional-designl
JKT
Z:\Commission Items\2017\06-06-2017\Madison Square West\Madison Square West CM Memo 06062017 .docx
Madison Square -West Parcel
Special Use and Variance Applications
5978 SW 64 Street
June 6, 2017
Page 90t9
Section 20-5.9(A) Expiration of Variance Approvals further provides that variances shall lapse
after one (1) year if no building permit has been applied for in accordance with the request and
if the City Commission has not specified a longer approval period for good cause shown.
PLANNING BOARD ACTION:
Following a public hearing on the item on May 30, 2017, the Planning Board voted five (5) ayes
to one (1) nay to recommend approval of the requested variance.
RECOMMENDAnON:
Staff recommends that the City Commission approve the variance application.
3. Unity of Title
Section 20-5.16 of the LOC provides that a unity of title shall be required in certain specified cases,
including:
* * *
2. Whenever the building site consists of more than one lot or parcel and the main
building is located on one or more of the lots or parcels and the remaining lots or parcels
encompassing the building site are required to meet the minimum zoning requirements.
* * *
The proposed site plan shows the mixed-use building on multiple lots, with the remaining lots
providing parking and a separation from the single-family district to the south.
RECOMMENDAnON:
Staff recommends that the City Commission approve the unity of title.
Attachments:
* Site plan
* Resolution approving the special use
* Resolution approving the variance
• Resolution approving the unity of title
JKT
Z:\Commission Items\2017\06-06-2017\Madlson Square West\Madison Square West eM Memo 06062017.docx
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
PLANNING BOARD
Special Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, May 30, 2017
CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS
07:00P.M.
The City of South Miami Code of Ordinances, Section SA-5, requires that aI/lobbyists, as defined in that section,
mlist register with the City Clerk before engaging in any lobbying activities and in most cases pay an annual fee oj
$500.00 and an additional $10d for each additional issue. This applies all persons who are retained .with or
without compensation to influence any action, decision, . with the city, including the
city manager, city attorney, deportment heads, city personnel, or the city commission or members oj
any city board, concerning a matter that could foreseeably be city commission or a city board. There
are some exceptions and exemptions. The fol/owing ore be lobbyist: a representative of a
principal at a quasi-judicial hearing, experts who present information at public meetings,
representatives of a neighborhood association of a not-for-profit
commL(nity based organization for the purpose of .. influence without special
compensation.
Individuals who wish to view or
meeting can be found on the city's
I. call to Order
Action: Mr. Basu ~g},.~¢.et:ing
II. Roll Call
ifAf"!l:ior'!Ii: of the
~tiiitirtiit.iI1~~'lolrulril~·~· r. Basu, (Chairman), Ms. Fischer, Dr. Philips,
·(Planning Director) and Mr. Marcus Lightfoot (Senior
City Attorney: Mr. Thomas Pepe
III. Administrative Matters
• None at this Time.
IV. Public Hearings
1
Mrs. Tompkins stated that the it~ms before the Board pertain to the parcels of land formally known
as Madison Square. Because of the geographic location of each of the parcels, the project was
further divided into Madison Square East and Madison Square West. Mrs. Tompkins then
recommended that the items be grouped together between the East and West projects and
reviewed accordingly. Mr. Basu recommended that the presentation be for the entire project and
then hold separate discussions on the items for both the east project and the west project. Mr.
Basu then questioned how the vote on the items would be performed. Mr. Pepe stated that the
items would need to be voted on separately but could be discussed as a group.
The Board then read each of the items into the record.
..: .......... . 1. PB-17-OO8 A.,;:,' , .... .
Applicant: City of South Miami:i'k·t£::(·
A Resolution pursuant to Section 2o-3.5(D}(l} a~~~~~pplicable provisions of the City of
South Miami Land Development Code approviJ:Ii~:incr~~~Jrom two stories to four stories
for a Mixed-Use Project on the West Madis~~ua~e properfY!~~~gaIlY described herein.
. .;{i;4tP·:> <'\(~jt",.
Mr. Melow read the item into the red:H';~~"" '<'%(."""
~~~ (~:.~;: .;\-. . t .:. ". ~~~5~ :""-~
2. ::~:== City of South Miami .. #··~;ii;;!;.,·'~~;;~l~~~.n~;q*'~( ,.
A Resolution pursuant to Sect~i:2~~P}(1) anl~~!. applicable provisions of the City of
South Miami Land Development'~e i~i,l1g an in~,~~ from two stories to four stories
for a Mixed-Use Proj~ct on the EastJ't.t'adisortsq\lar~ propef'lY;:~ legally described herein •
. A~~tti·:i::,.,7" . "'··:;i..,~:: ,"::;. "<:1',
Ms. Glavey re~.C!~e}iten1·iatQ.jlhe record?; .. ,«';:"
\1~~ .. ,~;,_r,~.:,;;,;,." ~\:;>'\. ;.-~ .... ~';.::-.~.i:..~::.":~j':"-. ~ -.. ~ ·;·T~:{
3. PB-17-o10 -"+i;~i:,. " «
ity of s'6Udi "'J/)::.~ .. " ~:';:'::'}'.
• ~~~"'.:. :..~~ ~."?-i' " ~)~
ting uest':'Pr1:;t vari~ from Section 20-4.4 and other applicable
ions 0 . .W of~" Miam):tijj.;p~~elopment Code to allow a reduction in the
. r of parkilll~ces ·~~"~.ded for a5i1iixed-Use Project on the East Madison Square
rba.uv as Ie all d~ed h~~ln
p z :"" g y '<:j~~~i, ' ''<~4{;
~ad the item the record.
~;."~~:{". ,
4 PB-17-o11;($:\,,"
. Applicant: City olii~~ mi
A Resolution relatiri"~\to· a request for a variance from Section 20-4.4 and other applicable .... ).
provisions of the City of South Miami Land Development Code to allow a reduction in the
number of parking spaces provided for a Mixed-Use Project on the West Madison Square
property as legally described herein.
Ms. Kahn read the item into the record.
Mrs. Tompkins presented the complete Madison Square project to the Board.
2
Ms. Fischer stated that the Board is being asked to vote on an increase from two (2) stories to
four (4) stories. She then asked why is the Board being asked to vote on this type of change
when all the backup provided proposes a height of three (3) stories.
Mrs. Tompkins stated that the reason behind this is that staff wanted to provide the City
Commission with options for the height. She then pOinted out that Staff is recommended that
the building be limited to three (3) stories in height.
Dr. Philips asked about the location of entry into the building. Arturo Fanjul, the architect of
record for the project explained the entrances into building #2 to the Board.
Ms. Kahn asked if the plans provided are specifically related:~p;Family Dollar. Mr. Pepe explained
the process by which a developer could propose a :.pm~ct to the South Miami Community
Redevelopment Agency (SMCRA). He then stated~~~~~;~~!oject before the Board is tied to
Family Dollar. In return for a Family Dollar being 'Pl;~~d iri'~ .. project, the developer will build
the project. Ms: Kahn' then responded that t 'e on the ite~~!i:;ted for review would be tied
to the LlC that owns the proposed Family", ~ ." > 'r that will be in the;j"AAdison Square project, but
•....•.•. ; .";:(;;:= .. ~;';' .,f.i:. .
there are options for other proposals. Mr'~~~~e stated yes to the res'pq'h~e from Ms. Kahn.
·,;;t;;:;\... . . ... ' }'\'
The Chairperson opened the floor to public cO~~ntson':!&e Complete
:. :~~:~l~:::~~iZ~.~~i;;~;~f~~:l~~\~\~,
.. (:;(f;'~:~~~:i~::·:~~·::·~· . '?:~\.. .:.: ./.~ .. ::. : .. >\.~. '"\/~:
The Chairpe~qri\~6Sed·i-''-t floor to~~bli~:)q;P1me~:Dn the Complete Madison Square
Project. i6<;,·<d<: .:;" ,,'~::'::' .'<':,,;: 1 :.:.~. ,,' ;. ~" ·Y .. :." ~ .
• Ms. Glavey
Ms. Glavey reiterated the need for affordable housing was prevalent. She also stated
that the additional housing was in line with the both the City's Land Development Code
and Comprehensive Plan. She then commended the way in which the parking was
handled for the project. Last, she stated that there were some design tweaks that could
be made to the elevations that would make the project better.
3
• Ms. Fischer
Ms. Fischer stated that anyone who thinks that she was against the Madison Square
project is mistaken. She then reiterated that she is for affordable housing in the City.
She added that the City will never get consensus for four (4) story tall Madison Square
project. She stated that to limit the parking in this type of area is considered
discrimination. If parking is going to be limited, then it should be limited across the
board for all multi-family buildings. She also mentioned that she has been hearing talk
about sharing 'parking spaces with the churches near the Madison Square project but
nothing has materialized yet. Last Ms. Pischer stated that for the betterment of the
community that we do get a Madison Square, st)e:will be voting No on the four (4)
~ ..... ", . . ~ ~ ~.~
./";:.>';' stories for Madison Square.
. ",:'.,~ .
• Ms. Kahn :-' .. ~ . '~:: .. :
Ms. Kahn stated that she understands,.1~impetus <to.)N~igh on the side of aesthetics,
but prefers to weigh her vote on I').d~:'-bf the people. Sh~i~lated that there is a certain
"):'".$;;.:' '-C.: fr ... '.~ ..
irony '!Vhen the discussion on par~1Itg and discrimination is·;m~mioned. She stated that
the community has been fighting fdf'*his project for a long ti~~}lhe area is pedestrian
friendly, with the Metr() Rail station n~~:t.\ly. SJu:~~1~6 stated that~Pi.. '. uld vote for the
project to be four (4);,:~tai'je~ and stated';t'h~::'~he has heard the c~ 'ments from the
-'::, ./;.'t~' .. -.!" •• ,: ~::-:'> . :;.,:::' .'~
community regarding Fati}ily .[~,Q1J~r and is nol'jo-favor of the future tenant, but thinks
that it. is important to ~~~ f~;Wi;f(:La.nd set th~::;parameters for it. After Dr. Philips
spoke, Ms .. ~ahn added th~libat th~·:af~Cnminati~W:.I~s in the fact that the area was
POPl!I~tet:l:~t~~~~fown busin~s~~~ befQ:~iShe'tfumsta~~d that part of this project is to
put a~~~~ble hO~Si~~while th'~:~~ff~';~'art is'trip~t the Family Dollar as an anchor to
stimulat~<business i&~'lhe area. She/closed with stating that she would like to see a
.,..rebirth of ~~if~~~S,t~i~b~·p~$.jo.esses ih'fhe community.
: .'; ::;<~~.i~iK·.~\·::·"·;::~·:·Y·· , '::'::~.~. .\ ..
Dr. PhiliPS;';!', ". . ,:',):;;-.'. "
.... Dr. Philips ;~~~Jt.~d a different iteration of the project that would have been tall against
.. "':','~~~e adjacent ~'frigt~.famii~·:~~jgences. She then gave an example of how the height could
'~;.~;@anaged so l6.:~~. the p~';firins of the project had four (4) stories that was set back
furt~er. away fronti,esidential with the remaining portions being set at three (3) story
With'~~'~;~rtiO~·,~tiser to the residences being set at two (2) stories. She also stated
that be~aJ$&.th~lJfroject is near public transportation, it is very generous to think that
each of the'(~~~iies living in the proposed residences will have two (2) vehicles. People
should be asked if they would like to give up one (1) of the parking spaces so that it
could be used for the commercial uses. She then stated that she was for the project.
• Mr. Basu
Mr. Basu stated that Madison Square has been the topic of discussion for a long time
and the best news is that the City has someone that is willing to finance the project. He
then stated that he has several issues with the project which are as follows:
4
1. Affordable Ho.using -How does the city safeguard the affordable housing so that it is
available for South Miami residents. Mr. Pepe explained that the development
agreement speaks to the requirements for obtaining housing in the project. Mr.
Basu then asked if there will be a combination of market rate and affordable
housing within the project, of which Mr. Pepe stated no. It will all be affordable
housing.
2. Parking -When it comes to parking, some of the residents will not have two (2)
vehicles. The project is within walking distance to public transportation. He also
feels that this is an opportunity where the community will come together and figure
out how to resolve the parking issue.
3. SW 64th Street -the street has a wide ROW with different uses that allows for
multimodal transportation. Because of that, thef~' should be a comprehensive look
at the corridor. , :::,
4. Transitional Zoning -The design is.:$ehsitie., to the transitional zoning from
commercial to residential. He' then. as~1!d if tli,-~'third (3) floor could be set back
further to aid in this transition. If ,nQhl~ng SW 64th. Street, at least along the SW 60th
Avenue side. . . .;:/~:{.;::". ..;): .
. :",:\}f:
-":"':'.:";'
Motion: Dr. Philips moved to approve PB~17.i!O08 as pres.~nted with ·S~s recommendations . .... ,,:,.. .... '" ·V'··
The motion was seconded by Mr. Melow. :::,;::" " ,'": ',:; :"~~:~;~\
·t ' ... :. .;' .:-.~' . ", tf.:,~ .•• ,.)~
... :;::: .... ::.~.~.:., .... ",:j":';' ':';:'<fl"'::-:':
Ms. Fischer stated that there~j';;mor;f! opportunltl~;,Jor affordable housing. To put all the
density into one (1) project is n()t.;~~e}MfihMhing to dO'}~lf,ordable housing should be scattered
throughout the city as opposed to·:6.~e specif!~J9~ation. Sh~c.losed by stating that when a large
amount of pressure.-is:applied to a speafic proj~tt;'i1:~will nev~r'Ytork out.
Ms. Glavey e·~r;:'~:'~::::~lrY~me tO~~~1~:~~k;~::1·~~~:(Pta~~kes. She then stated that this
would be first 1JfIl~~hat it w~~,Jmplement~~;:m the City which is an innovative thing to do. She
also r::~mmended,ttl~~,:ther~~:'p~5~r.share t#:tne project.
,'~l~i~:~,;' " "'.
Ms. Fist~:. No \:,ir;~
Ms. Kahn':'~es' . ':'j>
Dr. Philips: ~~~~j;. !{;:iI ~:",~~ ... ,,:. .:£~t:;
-.. :-: .... ~ ~ &.::-~,."':.(.-:':i?"
Motion: Ms. GlaveV,)pRP~d to approve PB-17-011 as presented with Staffs recommendations.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Melow.
Vote: Yes 5, No 1 (Fischer)
Dr. Philips: Yes
Ms. Kahn: Yes
Ms. Fischer: No
Mr. Basu: Yes
Ms. Glavey: Yes
Mr. Melow: Yes
5
Motion: Ms. Glavey moved to approve PB-17-009 as presented with Staff's recommendations.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Melow.
Vote: Yes 5, No 1 (Fischer)
Mr. Melow: Yes
Ms. Glavey: Yes
Mr. Basu: Yes
Ms. Fischer: No
Ms. Kahn: Yes
Dr. Philips: Yes
Motion: Dr. Philips moved to approve PB-17-010 as pr~~ented with Staffs recommendations.
The motion was seconded by Ms. Kahn. ,'"
Vote: Yes 5, No 1 (Fischer)
Dr. Philips: Yes
Ms. Kahn: Yes
Ms. Fischer: No
Mr. Basu: Yes
Ms. Glavey: Yes
Mr. Melow: Yes
5. PB-17-012
6.
V. Public Comments/New Business
;-:
.. ":-
... ....
inl'''''::I<1::'''' in the
East Madison Square property
The Chairperson opened the floor to public comments and any new business.
Public Comments Section
• Commissioner Walter Harris stated. that the Commission had already decided that the building
would be set at three (3) stories and that he was working with the City Attorney to craft
6
language to that effect. Ms . Fischer stated that the Board approved a height of four (4) stories
with a recommendation for three (3) stories.
• Bishop Jones, Marice Chael, and Levy Kelly each approached the podium and thanked the Board
for their vote on the items before them.
New Business Section
• Ms. Fischer stated that eleven (11) out of ninety -one (91) units in the Metro South building
across from City Hall have been allocated to South Miami r esidents . After looking into why this
was the case , she found out that the building only had a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy .
Because of that the company managing the building do~sH';{have to disclose any information
until the Certificate of Occupa ncy has been issued . Sh~theti stated that she stili wants to know
how any units will be allocated to South Miami andjh~it ~hewould like to see that a majority of
those units allocated for South Miami residents..~:· "':"
The Chairperson closed the floor to public conim~nts and any ne""; b~~iness.
. ;, ,,:',' . ",::.,~<: ":.
.. ~ .. ~.:; ..
VI. Approval of the Minutes
./
1. Special Planning Board Meeting;N\inutes of Ma'iih2-Z; 2017:
: :'~'~';'.. ~':;~.~. '
The Board unanimously appr00~d~~~:h1eeting minutes:with changes. There was no motion
held for the action ..
2. Regular Planniog::aoardMeeting Mill ~t¢s of M~;~h 14;' 20P <; ... :~"~~: ~'~. ·:·'~·~)t;~. "':.:; .:~.:,<. ::~<,~.:.' -. ~:,
The Board una:111mously apP:t,6ved the ~e:$iY~g minutes with changes . There was no motion
held for the actio·k ;k:-. )t.. . '
~-~, .
VII. F~!~f.~:;~~~ti~i6~~~:, ·\r. <
A)i,l;f~t~:c Meeting:Sj~~ep";;;11":t 700 p~
VIII. Adjourn~~!lt:.·~'~·'"
"{ .. ';;?;. :{·:.~;~~~S
.. :.< %.{'{:.~ (.i~:~~
Motion: Dr . PhiHp's :fT)oved t9'.~~pprove PB-17-010 as presented with Staff's recommendations_ The
'''$.,''"x.,):-..... ,"P ..
motion was second'~~-by M$~*~hn.
'~.;. " .... ..; ...... ' ,:.
Mr. Basu adjourned the'ri1eeting at 8 :22 P.M.
7
May 18, 2017
City of South Miami
Attn: Jane Tompkins, AICP
6130 Suns'et Drive
South Miami, Fl33143
r;r Soutn'Miami
THE CITY OF PLEASANT LIVING
SUBJECT: Madison Square West: 5978 SW64th Street (folio 09-40.25-010-0010.), 6415 SW 60.th
Avenue (folio 09-4025-0.10-0030), 6429 SW 60th Avenue (faUo 09-40.25-0.10-0040.),
6442 SW 59th Place (folio 09-4o.2s-olO-o.~8Q), 6420 sW 59th PI~ce (folio 09-4025-
0.10-0160), and ~~nt lots with .. the follow!ng folio numbers: 0.9-40~s-0.10-00SO, 09-
40.25-0.10-0020., 09-402s-{)10-:014o., ~nd 09-40.25-010-0170.
Dear Mrs. Tompkins,
This is to certify that the attached ownership list, map and mailing labels are a complete and
accurate representation of the real estate property and property owners within 500 feet radius
of the external boundaries of the subject properties listed above, !ncluding the subject property.
This reflects the most current records on the file in M;ami-Dade County Property Appraisers'
Office.
Sincerely,
It Marcus •
Senior PI
City of South Miami I 6130 Sunset Drive I South Miami, Fl33143-S093
305.663.6338 I southmiamifl.gov
)]-.I~l Q ,$_~J:::~'?.~H":CJ : .. '~ liP. ~
:1 m·'·· '!Ii
I 15 '
'Ii '.. ~. :~: .. ~:.::"'-::,:': ::' '~!tw'::~' ·;'EI~l:F,;;, j:' :·i·~·":·v.': ''E-~~:~:=': ::~, ~=' :~. ::;:::'·~d"~C:fj'Cj~~~"~:;~if"".;r !
,.~
--......:..:-~-..
:~W\,,;,:,,':':~f;.,.:;-::··~,,·,:'::',i~·,·::::},;;,:..:·,:,.{t;=~i~~~S;;~'jiii~Z~i:':-i ;;:--~"~~\i':"~':~:'Ii';';~-::;'!vi!
~'.,
,S .W".'~2:r(D::G.:-· J
,,,"
'1-'"" 8,
«:
M:
10':
~
--.11).--
:s:iN '63'R D'. 'AVE __ .
_:-__ '_;~'_--: ___ ~-'--"_S:" =~~~~:.::
~.( .:; ..
:,?
&
5=:
~'-5 '\'\C6 i:NU.::~i.>.::· :-::-_' ,--=:'-=::...-:.::::-:-.:, .: ~:::-.::::.:~.-'::'_:-=.,':':':;>::::-':'::~-:-"
./ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
Planning and Zoning Department
. 6130 Sunset Drive; South Miami, Florida 33143
Phone: (305) 663-6326; Fax #: (305) 668-7335
. On Tuesday, May 30, 2017 at 7:00 P.M., the City of South Miami's Planning Board will conduct
public bearings in the City Commission Chambers at the above address on the following items:
1. PB-17-008
Appl~caDt: City of South Miami
A ResohltiOD pursuaDt to SectiOD 2O-3.S(DX1) and other applicable provisions of the City of South
Miami Land Developmeat Code approving an increase from two stoties to four stories for a Mixed-
Use Project on the West Madison Square property as legally de5fribed hera.. .....
2. P8-17-009
AppJicant: City of South Miami
A Resolution punnut to Section 20-3.S(D)(1) and other applicable provisions of tile City of Soutb
Miami Land Developmeot Code approviDg an increase from two storieS to four stories for a Mixed-
Use Project on the East Madison Square property as legally described herein.
3. P8-1'-010
Applicant: City of South Miami
A Resolution relating to a request for a variance from Section 20-4.4 and other applicable
provisions of the City of South Miami Land Development Code to anow a reduction iD the number
of parking spates provided lor a Mixed-Use Project on tbe East MadisOD Square property as legally
described herein. ". . .
4. P8-17-011
AppUC8Ilt: City of South Miami
A Resolutioo re'ating to a request for a variance (rom Section 20-4.4 aDd other applicable
provisioll5 of tbe' City of South Miami Land Development Code to allow a reduction in the Dumber
of parking spaces provided for a· Mixed-Use Project on tbe West MadiioD Squ"re property as
legally described herein.
S. PB-17-011
Applicant: City of South Miami
A Resolution relating to a request for a variance from Section lO-3.5(G) and other applicable
provisions of the City of South M,iami Laud Development Code to allow aD iDCrea5e in the
maximum impervious coverage for a Mixed-Use Project ou the East Madison Square property as
legally described herein.
6. PB-17-013
Applicant: City of South Miami
A Resolutiou relating to a request (or a variance from Section lO-3.S(G) and other applicable
'. provisions of the City of South Miami Land Development Code to allow an increase !II the
maximum impervious coverage for a Mixed-Use Project on the West Madison Square property as
legally described herein.
All interested parties arc urged 10 altaid. Objections or expressions of approval may be made in person at the hearing or filed in writing
prior to or at the hearing. The PIamUng Board reserves the right 10 recommend to the City Commission whatever the board considus in
the best interest £or the area involved. Interested parties requesting infonnation are asklld to coatact the PIlDDing and Zoning
Departmeilt by calling 305·663·6326 or writing 10 the address indicated above. .
You are hereby advised that if any pCJSOII desires to appeal any decision a:ade with respect to any matter considered at this meetiDg or
hearing. such person will need a record of the proceedings. and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the
proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based (F.S. 286.0105). Refer to
hearing munber whea making any inquiIY.
SW64TH ST
6412
6428
6442
6456
6420
6487
6505
6501
6520
MIAMI CAlLY BUSINESS REVIEW
PubUShed Oa", a_pi Saturday, SuIIday and
Legal Ho/Idavs
Mlaml, Miami-Oede COUIII" Florida
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF MlAMf..DADE:
. Befote the undersigned authority pI!fSOI18/1y appeared
MARIA MESA. who on oath sap that he or she is the LEGAL
CLERK. Legal Notices of lhe Miami Daily Business Review
lAlla Miami Review, a daily (except SatunIay, Sunday and
Legal Holidays) newspaper, PUblished at Miami In Miami -Dade
County. Flotilla; thaI lite allached c:cpy of advertisement,
being a Legal Advertisement of Notice in the matter of
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI-pB-17-<lOa -APPLICANT: CITY OF
SOUTH MIAMI-MAY 30, ~17 -ETC
in the XXXX Court,
was published in saki newspaper in the iseues of
0511912017
Alliant further sap thai the said M!arn.i . DaUy Business
Review is a newspaper published at Miami, in said
Miarni-Oada County, FIoride and that the laid newspaper has
IteretofoIe been continuously pUblished in. said Miami-Dade.
County, FJotida each day (except SalUltlay, Sunday and
Legal. Holidays) and has been entered as second .class mea
matter at \he POSt office if! Miami in said Miarni-Dade County,
Florida. for a period of one year next preceding the fIrSt
Publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant
further says thai he or Ihe has neltller paid nor promised any
person, firm or COtpOration any diSOOlJllt, rebate, commission
or refund for the purpose of seclll'iltlJ this advertisement for
Sworn and BUbserl me this
19 day • ,.0. 20f~ _
£)~~~
./
"
22SE I I NEIGHBORS
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
COURTESY NOTICE
I SUNIlAY MAY Z8 2017
MIAMlHtRALO'(OM
NOTICE IS HERE8\: given thai the City Clll1lmi«i(11l of Ih~' Cil), Ilf SIIulh J\·1iami. FI(lrida will CIlIldlict Pul>lic H,'aring'" al its regular CilY Cllmmi~~i'lIImrl'lin!;
,~heduledlilr Tllesday, June 6, 21117. beginning al 7:1111 p.m .. in Ihe City Commi"j(ln Olumbers, Ii 1311 SIIIl,el Drive. II. considrr Ihe r. ,nll",in!! ilem! S):
A Rc<olutilln 11Illh(lrildng the City MWlager 1(1 Ilcglllillte and 10 enter inln a mulli-year c(lntracl with SlIuth Millmi Yllmh Ba<ebaJl Lc.lgue.lnc. I"'SMYBL"\ fllr
the mallilj;emcllt Ilf YIIUlh haseball scf\·il.-c, al PalmL'r Purle
A RCSlllulilln aUlh"riol:ing thc Cily MWluger III e!lLer illlllmlllti-yeur agJ"eement' wilh A.hl>riu. Inc., and Ber!!crnn Emcrgency Services. Inc., f,'r Disasler D~hris
Rem(lVal Wld Displlsul Ser\'ices thnlugh 3 pij;gyback from a City Ilf ~(lnh Miami Buach CIlntracl.
A Resululion Ilf Ihe Mayor amI City Cunulli"illn or Ihe City I.f Smuh Miami. "'('rida. aUlhnriziuj; the City Managcr III cxecule II Illulti-year Inter-Illcal
Agreement with Miallli-Dade C(lunty. and Ihe Miami-Dade Pnlic~ Departmelll. for Sdl\lul CruS'i.ng Guard Services.
A Reslllutillil appf"(l\'illg a Unity IIf Title lilr the Pr(J~'rtics Lllcaled <115971{ SW M" Slreet (ft.lil' 119-4U2S-II)II-\lnlll). MIS SW 60'" Al"ellu~ itilliu 1I\1-411:!5-
(I JiI-Il{l.~1I1 . 1>429 SW 6\1'" AVl'lluC (folin tl'l-41I::!S-I1 JiI-ilU40). f>442 5W W~ Place (flllin 111I-4U25-tllU-lIlli1h. f>.l::!11 5W :W·' Place (f(llill 1I'.1-41125-t1l1J-I116IJI. 111111
vacallliols wilh Ih~ ri,llll\"ing lilli" numbers: 1l1J-4U25-1I11l-11115n. \I11-411::!:'i-1I I 11-1111211. 1I1J-41125-fl I (1-01411. ami 1l1l~"2S-n I tl-1I171l.
A Resululiun apprm'ing a Unify IIf Title lilr Ihe Prnperrk, LI,o;alcLl al 5'l44 SW 64'" Slreel {/i.lill IIIJ-4J125-1111l-1l27UI, M(IJ SW :'ill PhlcC' lIillio (J'J-4025-1' J()-
CJ2filh. MIl SW 5" Place (r"Ii,' t)<)-4IJ15-(1I fl-ll::!1If1 ,. M I:; SW 5,,'b Place Ifnli,' !19-U125-111f1-mU/Jl. a VHemll h'l wilh a f,'lin numt>Cr 011l9-41125-fllll-ll:IIII. "n,1
6443 SW 5'1 PliI~'e Ifolil' (Jl)-4I125-IIJU-1I3:!Ot
A Resl,luliun purSlIOlIl1 III SecliI'n :!fl-3.5(Djll) anLl olher applkal>le I'I"Il\'isions nf the City Ilf S(.uth Miami Land [)(o\'l'llIpmclll CI>tI~ <IpPwl"ing an increase frt'm
IWII s("ries III (llur slnrics flIT II Mixed-Ust: Projecllln Ihe We\t M ... Ii,oll SIIUIIl"l' pl"l'prrly liS 1cgillly ,lcscrit>Cd herein.
A Resolutil'n pursuulll hI Sccli,," :!1l-3.5IDli 1IIIIId I'lher Ilpplicilble pnll"isi,'ns of Ihe Cily (If Sllulh Millllli L.md DC"e!I'pmelll ('I.dl' appl"I'vill~ un increase Ii-nm
tWII s"'ries hi h'ur s\Urics f(lr a Mixed-Use Projl'CI ('n tm-HIISI Mllllis(ln Square pmpcny liS legally Ikso;rihl'll herein.
A Rcsiliulicm relaling If. a rellu"sl flIT a "ariancc from SC"lillll 211-4.4 alld "I her appliclll>k I'rcl\'j~jlln, IIf Ih,' City uf Suulh Miami Land Dcvd"prncm C,.d,' "'
u1111\\' II reLluctiun in the number IIf parking splices Jlfuvilled lilr II Mixed-the Pn>jecl un the Easl Mildisnn Slluarc property i' legally de,cribeLl herein.
(A Resnllllillll relutinj; \I' a request fI'l" a variance ffilm S~clil.n 2\14.4 WlLl nther applil:able pnl\'isinns of tbt: City (If Soulh Miami LanLl Dewillpment CI'IIl' ItA
allnw II reducliun inthc nllmh~r 0)" parking ~paU!s pTlwklcd lilr II Mix~d-Use PrI'j~( un Ihc We,1 Madis(ln Squolrc pTIIJICrlY a_ Ic/:!ally dcscribed herein. V
A ReSl,lutilln relilling II' a request li'r a varian"e fr(lm Secliun 211-3.5IG) lmLl (llher applicable p11lvisil'n, lIr the Cily of Suolh Miami Land Dcwlupmem (,,,de
l<l allc'", ltll inl."Telise inlhc rnll.'timum imperviou~ ~1l\'er.1ge fIll" a Mixed-V<e Pmjcel on Ihe EII'I MIILlison Squal"c prupeny .. , Icgally describe" hereill.
A RcsI.luliun relating (I' II fCllucsl lilr a ,'unancc from Scclillll 211-3.51,0) iUld (l\hcr applicable pruvi~il'n, "r Ihe City of SI'ulh Miami Land DcwlllJlmcnt CI>d~'
III 1111I,w llll in~re'N' in tbl' IIlllximlim imperviulls CIlVCT"4gr )"(11"11 Mixed-lise Pf!\ie"lllll Ihe WL'sl Madi~111l Sqllar~ propcny 0._ Icg.ally described herein.
A Resolution auth(lri/jng the Cily Manager 10 '~Ilter illln a multi-year agreemenl with Limllusine, (.f S(luth Anrida, Inc., f(lr a Illlhlic IranspI,rtatillll dn:ulalnr
,CrviCI', hy piggybacking un'" its cllntrllct wilh Ihr CilY uf A\·cntura.
An Ordinance amending thc LWIII DevcJ,'prnenl C(""~. Anide II. Sectilln 211-2.3. "'Drlinitions" and Arlicl<' IJI. Scclil'n :!\I-.'I.6 "'SuppJemclll.tl Rcgulmiuns"
.tllding sul>~ecli"n (Wl "Slllar RL'ljuirernenN" and pf"(Jviding d"Dnili,'ns rchlling II. and crit~ria :md rr!,'ltlati(lns fllr s(llar cllJleclnr~ in Ihl' City Ilf SlllIIh Miami.
An Ordinan~"C amending Ih,' CilY of Slluth Miami LWld DI'VL'lopmelll Codc, ATlidc IV. Se~1illn 2/1-4.7 iB, III duril"y Ihe intent or Ihi> Sectilln 10 include
c(lmml'rdal pf"(.pcrtie~ and by milling slll>se~'li,'n I K) h' prllVide fllr screening "f the interi,'r I,f "acanl cI.rnmerdal prupen).
An Ordinance relating 1I'lhc City's 21117 fis.:al year budget: :ilIthnrizing all incr~as(! Ilf appfllprialillns fllr cxpendilllre lin\' it~m 125-17311-:'i41-.~45(J Pcuple's
Transporlatilln Tax Fund Direct Transil CI.nrraclual Scn'in', II"CllIIIlI in the ilmllunt Ilf \i711.5IlIJ.
All inl('resled panics lire invited II, ''\If'nd and will be h~nfll.
Fllr furlher inli·lrmillillll. pJ.'!I\e ~"nracllhe City Clerk's Ollic~ lit: .~1l5-M3-(\341l.
Maria M. Melwndcl., CMC
Cily Cler).;
Pur"'u,mllfl FJllr:d~1 ~laltl1r" ~klll.l~lU5. Ih: ('n)" lu·rrh)" •• h'llI:(,' Ihl' fluMh IhOl' if a p.:rt.;lIn II~l1CI(' ... Iu ;'rrr.aJ ~U1y d(:n~II'n made hy Ih,' }St'.1J11 .. '\;:enl"Y or Cclmmi .. 'lur: wlln rr'rCL"1 h';,"~ tnillll"'rl",.n"uli!'rl.,1
"I il~ nb.·cllII~ ,,. hl!ill1l1.t;. be ,'1 ~h.: wili lIe.:J OJ f\!l"nrtl ullht' rlU .. a:Clhll~"". "nd lhill fnr '11;.:11 l'U1rfl~':. ulh'\:tclll"l'hull 11&IY Ill'''''' h' r.!JNlfa: ahill is \CrnaU:ll rc"",,,d 11fal,,· f1IllL"L"l'lhJ~~ j" lI1.1d~ wind, n:,:md
1h .. ·lud~, Ih~ IC"lImml~ and l'\ IJcn",'~' nr''" \\"hH:h Ih~ :lrrcal, .. In tee Ilil .. C ....
MIAMI DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW
P,Ib.$I'oo D'IIly cncm Saturday. Sunday and
l.~HnbOiI1~
fAi"..... fbamioOftiM Counly. Flol'lda
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF MIAMI.DADE:
Before tho underSigned al.!thonty personally appeared
MARIA MESA, vmo on oath says Ihat he or she 1& the LEGAL
CLERK. Leoar Notl(es of the Miami oally Busrness Review
IJkta MiamI Review. a dally (except Sa1Utday, Sunday and
l~1 Holidays, newspaper, pubh&hed el Miami 11'1 Miaml-Oaae
Cl)unty Florida; Ihal the allBched copy Of advertlsemenl.
~ng " lP!lsl Advenlsemel'lt Of NotICe in lhe mallorn 0'
NOTICE OF PUBliC HEARING
C:1Y Or: SOUTH MIAMI-JUNE 6, 2017
II'llhe XXXX COUTI.
was srubhsh80 In said newSJ)8pel 11'1 the ISSlles 01
05119/201;
Affiant '~'l1l1er sa~s thai the said Miami DSlly Bu.~ness
Review IS 1.1 new&PIIPQr D\lbllshed itt Miami, In said
Maarru·Dade COUnljl. FlOnda and Ihat the $$d I"IfIWS9Bper has
heretofore been conlltluouSly PlIbhst\eIJ in yld Ml8mi -Dade
Caunly F'lonlia each day (except Saturday, Sunday and
L~gel HOItC!SY51 ana na5 bee" entered as second dRSS mad
matter 8t ttle post offICe In MiamI I" Bald Mlaml·Cade CounlY.
Floruja. for II pened 01 one year next precedmg the fast
publ>callon 01 1M allatMe(l! copy of advertlsemenl, and affiant
furttler 5ay'$ Ina! he Of She has nellher pau:I nOf promised any
oerson. firm 0' corporatIOn any dlscounl rebate. commisSion
or refunct tot ~! 'eC'U"II\9 this adveni&emenl bl
(SEALJ
MARIA Pf.ESA ~rsonally known 10 me
\\\11111111""1'11. ~*" 1II!RR.c'~' ~~;1. ~\':~"~!!..~ ~ ~~~~" ~ ! "'~~¢~"~ \ ~ f~W ••• ;.~ ~* \ QGOlITIS /ilj ~~·.AJ!~do.~!!~;§~
;,;.0: ".r..rlbtltn"'~. ~_.* ~ 1>J:: •• '~d<~<$' "*~II~'IIII'\\\\\"~
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINO
II011CE IS HERElIY given that the City Com_ 01 the City 01 south
Mlaml. Florida wlU conduct Pubic Hearlng{s}.t ~s regular CIty Commission
.... ,Iog SGNdu1e<l I .. T_. _ 6. 2017. bll!\inning .17:00 p.m •• ill the City
Cornmlssion Chambers. 6130 Sunset Drive. to consider the lol1ow1ng ~em{~:
A ResOlUUon authorizing the City Manager to nagotlme and 10 enter lnlO
a muni-y8ar contract with South MIami YOuth Baseball League. Inc.
rSMYBl1fotthe_tol youlh __ "1'aImeo" Pal1<.
A Resolution BUthorlzlng the City Menager to enter Into muln-year
agreements with A5Iilritt. I~, and Bergaron Emergency Serviees. Inc ..
for 01 .... " DebriS Ramoval end DIsposal SeN ... throUlih a plggybaek
110m a City of North Miami BeaCh .onllllCt.
A Resolution 01 me Mayor .... CIIy Commi_ 01 the City of South
MIand. Florida.IlUIhO<iZI>9"'CIty _lOeucut •• nndti· .... """,·local
Agreement wHh Miami-Dade coumy, and the Miami-Dade P06ce Department.
for SchOOl Crosslnc;J Guard SeNices.
A Resolution approving B UnIty of TI11e for tne Proper11es Loceted at
5978 SW 64th SIleO' {fotlo 09-4025·010·0010}. 64'8 SW -Avenu.
(Iollo 09-4025-010-00301 .8429 SW 60th Avenue {Iollo 09·4025-0'O·Q1l40}.
6442 SW 59th Place ~0110 1J9.4(J25-G1D-01BO}. 6420 SW 6911\ Place (folio
Q9.4025.01D-O'BO). and vaeent lots with the IoIlowIng loIio .. ."b.""
09-'1025.0'0-0050. 09-4025-0'0-0020. 09-4025.0'0.0140. and 09-4025·
010.0170.
A Resolution appwvIng 6 UnIty of Title far the Properties Located at
5944 SW 64th Sbeet {to'o 09-4025·010-027~ 6401 SW 59 Place {Iollo
CJ9.4025-0fO.Q2BO}. 6411 SW 59 Place (1oIio CJ9.402S·0'D-029O). 6415
SW 59th Place {folio (J9.4025.010-0300) •• ..-lot with a_ number
of 09-4D25.Qlo-03'0. and 6443 SW 59 Place ~0110 09-4025.of0.Q320~
A Resolytlon pursuam to Seotlon 20·3.S(Olt1} and other appllcaDle prov~1ons 01 the City 01 South Mlaml J.mI Develop.,,,,,, Code .ppro~ng
an Increase from two stories to four stories lor a Mled·Use Project on theWes1 ___ ptopertyaal8gally-her<lin.
A Re&olution pursuanI to S.ctlon 20-3.5(D)l1} and other applicable
pn>vlolons 01 the City ot SOUth Miami J.mI o.veJopmonl Code .pprovIng
an increa&8 from two stories to tour 8tOl'ies lor a Mbted·Use Pro}ect on the
EBBI Madison SQuare property 8SIegally desctlbed hereIn.
A Resolution rela1ing to 8 reQuest for a variance from SlK:tion 21).4.4 and
other appJicabla provisionS of the CilV of Scuth Miami Land Development
Code to aIIow a reduction In the number of p81kJng epocss provided for
a Mixed-Use Projec:1 on the East Madison S~uare proper1y al legaUy
described herein.
(
A Resolution relating to B reque&1 for a vanance from SacHon 20-4.4 end)
ottl" ,pp~ ptayislona 01 the City 01 Sou1h Miami Lard Dovelopment
COde to aUOW II reduction In the number or parking spaces provided lor
a Mixed-Use Project on the West Madison Square property as legally
described heroin.
A Resolution relatin;J to 8 request for a variance from Section 2O-3.SIGI and ""'ar app_ provisions 01 the City of SOuth Miami Lard Development
Code 10 aUow an Increase in me maxlmum Impervtous coverage for a .
MIxed·U .. ProjecI on ttle ea.t Madison Squ .. e p_ as 'egalty _heroin.
A Resolution re!at!ng to a requal' for a variance Iran Section 2O-3.5(G} and
other applicable ","",.Ions 01 the City 01 Sou'h M~m' Land DoYelopmonl
Code to allow an increase in the moximum impervious coverage for 8
MIJ(ed·Use Project on lhe Wast Madison Square propeny BS legally de __ .
M OnIinanoe amending tile Lard Development Code. Attlcle II. 5sctIon
20-2.3. 'DeIlnItions· and MIeIe'~ _ 20-3.6'~ ReguIat .... •
adding subsection (Wl ·501sr Flequlrements-and providing definillons
relating 10 and criteria and regula1101\$ tor sotar collectors In the City 01
SoulhMlaml.
An Ordlnance amending the City of South MiamJ Land Developmem
Code. Artide IV, Section 2()..4.7 (8) 10 clarify the Intant of thls Section 10
include cammen:im propettleS and by adding subseCtion (K) to provide
for screening of the interior 01 vacant commefc:ial property.
ALL interested partlSS aralnvited 10 flHend 8nd will be heard.
For further Information. please contact the City Clerk's Office 81:
3Q5.883·6340.
Maria M. MefIIItIC!ez. CMC
City Clerk
PumJant to Florida Statules 286.0105. the City hereby advises the public
that il 8 person declOee to eppeal 8fP/ deciaIon l'TI8de btl mis Board, 'Agency
or Commission with respect 10 any matter consid&red a1 its meeting or
h8Bring. he or she will need a record of the proceedings, and thai for sueh
purpose, affected person may need to ensure thai a verbatim record of the
proceedings Is made which record includes the testimony and evidence
upon which the appeel is 10 be based.
5/'9 '7·'06I0000226232M