Res No 123-17-14924RESOLUTION NO. 123-17-14924
A Resolution relating to a request for a variance from Section 20-4.4 and other applicable
provisions ofthe City of South Miami Land Development Code to allow a reduction in the
number of parking spaces provided for a Mixed-Use Project on the West Madison Square
property as legally described herein.
WHEREAS, the City of South Miami initiated an application (number PB-17 -0 II) requesting a
variance from Section 20-4.4 of the Land Development Code (LDC) in conjunction with a Mixed-Use
Project located at 5978 SW 64th Street (folio 09-4025-0 I 0-00 I 0), 6415 SW 60 th Avenue (folio 09-4025-
010-0030), 6429 SW 60th Avenue (folio 09-4025-010-0040), 6442 SW 59th Place (folio 09-4025-010-
0180), 6420 SW 59th Place (folio 09-4025-010-0160), and vacant lots with the following folio numbers:
09-4025-010-0050, 09-4025-010-0020, 09-4025-010-0140, and 09-4025-010-0 170 (collectively referred
to as "West Madison Square"); and
WHEREAS, the Mixed-Use Project will consist of approximately 8,868 square feet of ground
floor commercial space and twenty (20) residential units; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 20-4.4 ofthe LDC, the project is required to provide a total of
seventy -two (72) parking spaces; and
WHEREAS, the proposed project provides forty-one (41) parking spaces on-site and may be
given credit for fourteen (14) on-street spaces pursuant to Section 20-4.4 of the LDC for a total of fifty-
five (55) parking spaces; and
WHEREAS, the City is requesting a variance to allow a reduction in the number of required
parking spaces; and
WHEREAS, the approval of a variance requires a review by the Planning Board and a
recommendation to approve, deny or approve with conditions, as well as the approval ofthe City
Commission after a public hearing; and
WHEREAS, at special-meeting on May 30, 2017, the Planning Board held a public hearing on
the application, considered each of the variance criterion listed in Section 20-5.9 of the LDC and voted
five (5) ayes to one (1) nay to recommend approval ofthe variance requested; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami, having considered
each of the variance criterion listed in Section 20-5.9 ofthe LDC and having found that those conditions
have been met, desire to approve the application for the variance.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR Al'I'l) CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA THAT:
Section 1. The recitals set forth in this resolution are true and they are supported by competent
substantial evidence and they are incorporated into this resolution by reference as if set forth in full
herein.
Section 2. The application (number PB-17 -011) submitted by the City of South Miami requesting
a variance to reduce the number of required parking spaces from seventy-two (72) to fifty-five (55) for
the proposed Mixed-use project located at 5978 SW 64 th Street (folio 09-4025-010-0010), 6415 SW 60 th
Avenue (folio 09-4025-010-0030),6429 SW 60 th Avenue (folio 09-4025-010-0040), 6442 SW 59 th Place
Pg. 2 of Res. No. 123-17-14924
(folio 09-4025-010-0160), and vacant lots with the following folio numbers: 09-4025-010-0050, 09-
4025-010-0020,09-4025-010-0140, and 09-4025-010-0170, South Miami, Florida is hereby approved.
Section 3. The approval of the requested variance is based on the conceptual design plan signed
and sealed by Arturo G. Fanjul, RA for the proposed Mixed-Use project which is an Exhibit to the
Application and which is incorporated herein by reference.
Section 4. Severability. If any section clause, sentence, or phrase of this resolution is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, the holding shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this resolution.
Section 5. Effective Date. This resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6 thday of June ,2017.
APPROV1~/ I //1 A gh6J nfvd/..k/J
. YOR
COMMISSION VOTE: 4-1
Mayor Stoddard: Yea
Vice Mayor Welsh: Yea
Commissioner Harris: Yea
Commissioner Edmond: Yea
Commissioner Liebman: Nay
THE CITY OF PLEASANT LIVING
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
To: The Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Commission
VIA: Steven Alexander, City Manager
FROM: Jane K. Tompkins, AICP, Planning Director
Date: June 6, 2017
SUBJECT:
1. A Resolution pursuant to Section 20-3.5(D)(1) and other applicable provisions
of the City of South Miami Land Development Code approving an increase from two
stories to four stories for a Mixed-Use Project on the East Madison Square property
as legally described herein.
2. A Resolution relating to a request for a variance from Section 20-4.4 and other
applicable provisions of the City of South Miami Land Development Code to allow a
reduction in the number of parking spaces provided for a Mixed-Use Project on the East
Madison Square property as legally described herein.
3. A Resolution approving a Unity of Title for the Properties Located at 5944 SW 64 th
Street (folio 09-4025-010-0270),6401 SW 59 Place (folio 09-4025-010-0280), 6411 SW 59
Place (folio 09-4025-010-0290),6415 SW 59 th Place (folio 09-4025-010-0300), a vacant lot
with a folio number of 09-4025-010-0310, and 6443 SW 59 Place (folio 09-4025-010-0320).
BACKGROUND:
The South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) owns approximately 1.2 acres of
property on the south side of SW 64 th Street generally referred to as Madison Square. The
CRA's planning document designates the area for a mixed-use redevelopment proposal that will
create an anchor for the north end of SW 59 th Place and help stimulate revitalization efforts in
the area .
For the purposes of the development review, the property is described as either East or West
Madison Square, with SW 59th Place serving as the divider. This memo focuses on the zoning
requests for East Madison Square; the West Madison Square requests are addressed in a
separate memo. The East property consists of six (6) parcels on the south side of SW 64th Street
and the east side of SW 59th Place as shown in the highlighted area below:
Madison Square -East Parcel
Special Use and Variance Applications
S944 SW 64 Street
June 6, 2017
Page 2 of g '
Subject Property located 6401 SW 59th Place
The properties total 19,653 square feet in size (net) and are identified on the City's maps as
5944 SW 64th Street, 6429 SW 59 th Place, 6443 SW 59th Place, and three vacant parcels that
have not been assigned a street number1 .
All t~e parcels are zoned "SR" Specialty Retail. A strip of land along the east edge of 5944 SW 64th
Street is also part of the Community Service Overlay area. The City's Future land Use Map (FlUM)
designates all the parcels as "Mixed-Use Commercial Residential (Four-Story)".
I The Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser's website identifies these vacant parcels as 6401 SW 59th Place, 6411
SW 59 th Place, and 6415 SW 59 th Place.
JKT
Z:\Commission Items\2017\06-06-2017\Madison Square East\Madison Square East CM Memo 06062017.docx
Madison Square -East Parcel
Special Use and Variance Applications
5944 SW 64 Street
June 6, 2017
Page 3 of 9
Zoning Map Excerpt Future Land Use Map Excerpt
Surrounding land uses, zoning and FLUM designations are as follows:
Church
Church Parking
Eas' Lot
Vacant and
~es:l! Commercial
Buildi
* Community Service Overlay
RS-4 *
RS-4 *
SR Mixed-Use Commercial
Residential (Four-Story)
The City of South Miami is proposing a mixed-use project for Madison Square. The East property
will consist of approximately 3,566 square feet of commercial space on the ground floor and
twenty (20) residential units on the second and third floors (ten units per floor). The proposed
uses are permitted in the SR district (see Land Development Code (LDC) Sec. 20-3.3{D)).
The residential component will be developed and maintained as affo r dable units pursuant to an
agreement between the CRA and the developer. The commercial space will be divided into four
(4) separate tenant bays.
JKT
Z:\Commission Items\2017\06-06-2017\Madison Square East\Madison Square East CM Memo 0606201 i docx
r
Madison Square -East Parcel
Spedal Use and Variance Applications
5944 SW 64 Street
June 6, 2017
Page4of9
Twenty-six (26) parking spaces will be available on-site. Pursuant to Section 20-4.4 of the lOC,
five (5) spaces on SW 64th Street can be credited to the project for a total of thirty-one (31) spaces.
A bus stop located on SW 59th Place prohibits the development of additional on-street spaces.
A landscape buffer separates the parking lot from the properties to the south and east. The site
plan complies with the setback, FAR and impervious coverage standards of the LOC.
The attached exhibit contains the plans for both the East and the West properties. Sheet AO.1
illustrates the concept plan for both the East and the West properties. Sheets AO.2(E), A1.2.1,
and A1.2.2 provide the site plan, floor lay-out and conceptual elevations for the East side.
REQUEST:
As proposed, the project requires the following approvals, which are described and analyzed
below:
1. A Special Use to allow a height of three-stories.
2. A Variance to allow a reduction in the number of parking spaces provided.
3. A Unity of Title
ANALYSIS:
1. A Special Use to allow a height of three-stories.
The SR zoning district allows a height of four stories or fifty (50) feet. This provision is limited,
however, by Section 20-3.5(0) Properties Abutting Single-Family Zoning Districts of the lOC
which states:
(1) Notwithstanding the dimensional requirements of the zoning use district in which a
property is located, if that property is abutting (common border or separated by a r;ght-
of-way) to a single-family zoning district the maximum height of any new building or any
vertical addition to an existing building on that property is limited to two stories,
however, additional height may be obtained via the special use permit process as set
forth in Section 20-S.B.
As noted above, the project abuts a single-family zoning district on three sides (north, east and
south) and is designed at three (3) stories.
Special Use applications are controlled by LDC Section 20-5.8 Special use approvals, as follows:
(1) Prior to approving a special use, the city commission shall find that such use meets the
conditional requirements set forth in Section 20-3.4 and that it:
JKT
Z:\Commission Items\2017\06-06-2017\Madison Square East\Madison Square East CM Memo 06062017.docx
Madison Square -East Parcel
Special Use and Variance Applications
5944 SW 64 Street
June 6, 2017
Page 5 of9
(a) Will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the
vicinity of the proposed use;
(b) Will not be detrimental to the public weI/are or property or improvements in the
neighborhood; and
(c) Complies with all other applicable Code provisions.
(2) Additional Conditions. The city commission may designate such additional conditions in
cannection with a special use as will, in its opinion, assure that such use will conform to
the foregoing requirements.
The conditional requirements of Section 20-3.4 include general requirements that apply to all
applications as well as special requirements that apply to specific types of special uses. There
are no special req·uirements for allowing additional stories, so only the general requirements
apply:
(1) All such uses shall comply with all requirements established in the appropriate zone use
district, unless additional or more restrictive requirements are set forth below or by the
City Commission.
(2) All such uses shall be determined to be of a compatible and complementary nature with
any existing, planned or anticipated surrounding uses.
(3) A public hearing shall be held by the City Commission to determine the overall
compatibility of the use with the surrounding neighborhood. .
(4) If a special use is, in the future, determined by the Director of the Planning and Zoning
Department or the City Commission, to be adversely affecting the health, safety or
weI/are, including quiet enjoyment, of persons residing or working in the vicinity of the
proposed use, or otherwise to be detrimental to the public weI/are or property or
improvements in the surrounding neighborhood, or to be not in compliance with any
other applicable Code provisions, the special use approval may be modified, with
conditions of approval revised or added to alleviate such adverse effect, or revoked by
the City Commission upon notification and public hearing.
STAFF REsPONSE:
After review ofthe project, the proposed building complies with conditions and requirements
listed in both Section 20-5.8(8) and 20-3.4(A) of the LDC in that:
JKT
o Increasing the height of the building from two (2) stories to three (3) should not adversely
affect the hea.lth or safety of persons residing or working in the area, nor will it be
detrimental to the public welfare or property or improvements in the neighborhood;
o The proposed building complies with other applicable Code provisions regarding size and
setbacks;
o While most buildings in the area are single-story, the nearby churches have elements or
architectural features that are comparable in height to the proposed building;
Z:\Commission Items\2017\06-06-2017\Madison Square East\Madison Square East eM Memo 06062017.docx
Madison Square -East Parcel
Special Use and Variance Applications
S944 SW 64 Street
June 6,2017
Page 6of9
o The proposed building is of a compatible and complimentary nature with the existing,
planned or anticipated surrounding uses.
Finally, Section 2a-S.B(e) of the LDC provides that an approval shall lapse after six (6) months if
not master building permit which implements the special use has been issued for such use. The
City Commission may specify a longer approval period for good cause.
PLANNING BoARD ACTION:
Following a public hearing on May 30, 2017, the Planning Board voted five (5) ayes to one (1)
nay to recommend approval of the special use with Staff's recommended conditions.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Commission approve the special use application with the
following conditions:
1. That the building be limited to three (3) stories in height; and
2. That the project is developed in substantial compliance with the plans prepared by Fanjul
& Associates, LLC and attached to this memo.
Further, Staff recommends that the City Commission consider a longer approval period to ensure
the developer adequate time to obtain the master building permit.
Z. Variance to allow a reduction in the number of parkinl spaces provided.
The proposed project consists of approximately 3,566 sf of commercial space and twenty (20)
housing units. Based on this design, a total of fifty-four (54) parking spaces are required per
Section 20-4.4 of the LDC:
Retail Parking Spaces Required
3,566 &-JZ.., 1 Parking Space .
1 x 300 &:-p-: ItS 12 Parkmg Spaces
Plus
Residential Parking Spaces Required
20 ~ 2 Parking Space
1 x ~ ItS 40 Parking Spaces
JKT
Z:\Commlssion Items\2017\06-06-2017\Madison Square East\Madlson Square East eM Memo 06062017.docx
Madison Square -East Parcel
Special Use and Variance Applications
5944 SW 64 Street
June 6, 2017
Page 7 of9
Plus
20 fBf:H& 1 Visitor Parking Space
1 x 10 ~ ~ 2 Visitor Parking Spaces
TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: 12 + 40 + 2 = 54
·Thirty-one (31) spaces are shown on the proposed site plan, for a shortage of twenty-three (23)
spaces. Of the thirty-one (31) spaces available, twenty-two (22) will be allocated for the
residential units (i.e., one space per unit plus two visitor spaces); the remaining nine (9) spaces
will be allocated for the commercial tenant(s}. The City and CRA are negotiating with the nearby
churches to provide additional parking for the project. However, since the negotiations have not
been finalized a variance approval is necessary.
Pursuant to Section 20-5.9 of the lDC, a variance for off-street parking can be reviewed and
permitted by the City Commission at a public hearing, after a recommendation by the Planning
Board. Variance decisions shall be based on an affirmative finding as to each of the following
criterion:
JKT
1. The variance is necessary to relieve particular extraordinary conditions relatinl to a
specific property;
Response: The site's small size and dimensions make this a particularly challenging site
to develop.
2. Denial of the variance would result in hardship to the owner. Hardship results if the
restriction of the zoning ordinance, when applied to a particular property, becomes
arbitrary, confiscatory or unduly oppressive because of conCiitions of the property that
distinguish it from other properties under similar zoning restrictions;
Response: Development of the property is limited by its size, dimensions, and the code
requirements that limit height and impervious coverage. These factors combine to make
it difficult to comply with the parking requirements. Further, denial of the variance will
impede the development of much needed affordable housing for South Miami and
commercial tenants that will offer essential goods and services within walking distance of
many residents.
3. The extraordinary conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the
applicant;
Response: The neighborhood was platted with small, narrow lots that make it difficult to
assemble sites large enough to accommodate a mixed-use development that complies
Z:\Commission Items\2017\06-06-2017\Madison Square East\Madison Square East CM Memo 06062017.docx
Madison Square -East Parcel
Special Use and Variance Applications
5944 SW 64 Street
June 6, 2017
Page 8 of9
with all the current LDC requirements and meets the community's objectives.
Consequently, the extraordinary conditions and circumstances do not result from the
actions of the applicant.
4. The requested variance is the minimum variance necessary to make possible the
reasonable use of the land, building or structure;
Response: The project is designed to help achieve the community's goal of providing as
many affordable units as possible, while still being sensitive to the scale of the
surrounding neighborhood and limiting impacts on the nearby neighborhood. While a
parking structure might allow additional parking, it's unli,kely that a structure would fit on
the property2. Further, if a structure was physically possible, the building would be
disproportionate and out of keeping with the character of the neighborhood.
Consequently, the requested variance is the minimum necessary to make possible the
reasonable use of the land.
s. That the approval of the variance will be consistent with the general intent and purpose
of the Land Development Code, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or
otherwise detrimental to the public welfare.
Response: The purpose of the SR district is lito maintain the basic specialty retail character
of the Sunset Drive commercial area by encouraging comparison retail uses at the
pedestrian-oriented grade level and office and residential uses on the upper floors of all
buildings" (Sec. 20-3.1(14)}. All other properties with an SR designation are in the
Hometown District Overlay and, as such, are allowed a twenty-five percent (25%) parking
reduction for mixed-use buildings. Parking reductions for mixed-use buildings are not
uncommon. If that reduction were applied to this project, only forty-one (41) spaces
would be required. Consequently, approval of the variance will be consistent with the
general intent and purpose of the LDC and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or
otherwise detrimental to the public welfare.
Finally, Section 20-5.9(A}, Expiration of Variance Approvals of the LDC provides that variances
shall lapse after one (1) year if no building permit has been applied for in accordance with the
request and if the City Commission has not specified a longer approval period for good cause
shown.
PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION:
Following a public hearing on May 30,2017, the Planning Board voted five (5) ayes to one (1) nay
to recommend approval of the requested variance.
2 For additional information about the sizing requirements of parking structures, please refer to :
http://www .timhaahs.com/parkingdatabase/what-are-some-typical-standards-for-parking -garage-functional-design!
JKT
Z:\Commission Items\2017\06-06-2017\Madison Square East\Madison Square East CM Memo 06062017.docx
Madison Square -East Parcel
Special Use and Variance Applications
S944 SW 64 Street
June 6,2017
Page 9 of9
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Commission approve the variance application.
3. Unity of Title
Section 20-5.16 of the LOC provides that a unity of title shall be required in certain specified cases,
including:
* * *
2. Whenever the building site consists of more than one lot or parcel and the main
building is located on one or more of the lots or parcels and the remaining lots or parcels
encompassing the building site are required to meet the minimum zoning requirements.
* * *
The proposed site plan shows the mixed-use building on multiple lots, with the remaining lots
providing parking and a separation from the single-family district to the south.
Attachments:
• Site plan
• Resolution approving the special use
• Resolution approving the variance
• Resolution approving the unity of title
JKT
Z:\Commission Items\2017\06-06-2017\Madison Square East\Madlson Square East eM Memo 06062017.docx
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
PLANNING BOARD
Special Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, May 30,2017
CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS
07:00 P.M.
The City of south Miami Code of Ordinances, Section SA-5, requires that aI/lobbyists, as defined in that section,
must register with the City Clerk before engaging in any lobbying activities and in most cases pay an annual fee of
$500.00 and an additional $100 for each additional issue. This applies to aI/ persons who are retained with or
without compensation to influence any action, deCiSion, recommendation of someone with the city, including the
city manager, city attorney, department heads, city personnel, or members of the city commission or members of
any city board, concerning a matter that could foreseeably be address by the city commissian or a city board. There
are some exceptions and exemptions. The following are not considered to be lobbyist: a representative of a
principal at a quasi-judicial hearing, experts who present scientific or technical information at public meetings,
representatives of a neighborhood association without compensotion and representatives of a not-for-profit
community based organization for the purpose of requesting a grant who seek to influence without special
compensation.
Individuals who wish to view or listen to the meeting in its entirety, audio and video versions of the
meeting can be found on the city's website (www.southmiamifl.gov).
I. Call to Order
Action: Mr. Basu called the meeting to order at 7:06 P.M.
II. Roll Call
Board Members Present Constituting a Quorum: Mr. Basu, (Chairman), Ms. Fischer, Dr. Philips,
Ms.l(ahn, Mr. Melow, and Ms. Glavey.
Board Members Absent: Dr. Palmer
City Staff Present: Ms. Jane Tompkins (Planning Director) and Mr. Marcus Lightfoot (Senior
Planner/Zoning Administrator).
City Staff Absent: None
City' Attorney: Mr. Thomas Pepe
III. Administrative Matters
• None at this Time.
IV. Public Hearings
1
Mrs. Tompkins stated that the items before the Board pertain to the parcels of land formally known
as Madison Square. Because of the geographic location of each of the parcels, the project was
further divided into Madison Square East and Madison Square West. Mrs. Tompkins then
recommended that the items be grouped together between the East and West projects and
reviewed accordingly. Mr. Basu recommended that the presentation be for the entire project and
then hold separate discussions on the items for both the east project and the west project. Mr.
Basu then questioned how the vote on the items would be performed. Mr. Pepe stated that the
items would need to be voted on separately but could be discussed as a group.
The Board then read each ofthe items into the record.
1. PB-17-00s
Applicant: City of South Miami
A Resolution pursuant to Section 20-3.5(0)(1) and other applicable provisions of the City of
South Miami Land Development Code approving an increase from two stories to four stories
for a Mixed-Use Project on the West Madison Square property as legally described herein.
Mr. Melow read the item into the record.
2. PB-17-009
Applicant: City of South Miami
A Resolution pursuant to Section 20-3.5(D)(1) and other applicable provisions of the City of
South Miami Land Development Code approving an increase from two stories to four stories
for a Mixed-Use Project on the East Madisor, Square property as legally described herein.
Ms. Glavey read the item into the record.
3. PB-17-010
Applicant: City of South Miami
A Resolution relating to a request for a variance from Section 20-4.4 and other applicable
provisions of the City of South Miami Land Development Code to allow a reduction in the
number of parking spaces provided for a Mixed-Use Project on the East Madison Square
property as legally described herein.
Ms. Fischer read the item into the record.
4. PB-17-011
Applicant: City of South Miami
A Resolution relating to a request for a variance from Section 20-4.4 and other applicable
provisions of the City of South Miami Land Development Code to allow a reduction in the
number of parking spaces provided for a Mixed-Use Project on the West Madison Square
property as legally described herein.
Ms. Kahn read the item into the record.
Mrs. Tompkins presented the complete Madison Square project to the Board.
2
Ms. Fischer stated that the Board is being asked to vote on an increase from two (2) stories to
four (4) stories. She then asked why is the Board being asked to vote on this type of change
when all the backup provided proposes a height of three (3) stories.
Mrs. Tompkins stated that the reason behind this is that staff wanted to provide the City
Commission with options for the height. She then pointed out that Staff is recommended that
the building be limited to three (3) stories in height.
Dr. Philips asked about the location of entry into the building. Arturo Fanjul, the architect of
record for the project explained the entrances into building #2 to the Board.
Ms. Kahn asked if the plans provided are specifically related to Family Dollar. Mr. Pepe explained
the process by which a developer could propose a project to the South Miami Community
Redevelopment Agency (SMCRA). He then stated that the project before the Board is tied to
Family Dollar. In return for a Family Dollar being placed in the project, the developer will build
the project. Ms. Kahn then responded that the vote on the items listed for review would be tied
to the LLC that owns the proposed Family Dollar that will be in the Madison Square project, but
there are options for other proposals. Mr. Pepe stated yes to the response from Ms. Kahn.
The Chairperson opened the floor to public comments on the Complete Madison Square.
• Bishop Larry Jones -Support
• Marice Chael-Support
• Levy Kelly -Support
The Chairperson dosed the floor to public comments on the Complete Madison Square
Project.
The Board grouped the items in the following order:
• Madison Square West -PB-17-008 & PB-17-011
• Madison Square East -PB-17-009 & PB-17-010
Madison Square West
Mr. Basu allowed for each of the Board members to speak on the items pertaining to Madison
Square West
• Mr. Melow
Mr. Melow stated that he was for the project.
• Ms. Glavey
Ms. Glavey reiterated the need for affordable housing was prevalent. She also stated
that the additional housing was in line with the both the City's Land Development Code
and Comprehensive Plan. She then commended the way in which the parking was
handled for the project. Last, she stated that there were some design tweaks that could
be made to the elevations that would make the project better.
3
• Ms. Fischer
Ms. Fischer stated that anyone who thinks that she was against the Madison Square
project is mistaken. She then reiterated that she is for affordable housing in the City.
She added that the City will never get consensus for four (4) story tall Madison Square
project. She stated that to limit the parking in this type of area is considered
discrimination. If parking is going to be limited, then it should be limited across the
board for all multi-family buildings. She also mentioned that she has been hearing talk
about sharing parking spaces with the churches near the Madison Square project but
nothing has materialized yet. Last Ms. Fischer stated that for the betterment of the
community that we do get a Madison Square, she will be voting No on the four (4)
stories for Madison Square.
• Ms. Kahn
Ms. Kahn stated that she understands the impetus to weigh on the side of aesthetics,
but prefers to weigh her vote on needs of the people. She stated that there is a certain
irony when the discussion on parking and discrimination is mentioned. She stated that
the community has been fighting for this project for a long time. The area is pedestrian
friendly, with the Metro Rail station nearby. She also stated that she would vote for the
project to be four (4) stories and stated that she has heard the comments from the
community regarding FamilyDollar and is not in favor of the future tenant, but thinks
that it is important to move forward and set the parameters for it. After Dr. Philips
spoke, Ms. Kahn added that that the discrimination lies in the fact that the area was
populated with its own businesses before. She then stated that part of this project is to
put affordable housing while the other part is to put the Family Dollar as an anchor to
stimulate business in the area. She closed with stating that she would like to see a
rebirth of self-sustaining businesses in the community.
• Dr. Philips
Dr. Philips recalled a different iteration of the project that would have been tall against
the adjacent single family residences. She then gave an example of how the height could
be managed so that the portions of the project had four (4) stories that was set back
further away from residential with the remaining portions being set at three (3) story
with the portions closer to the residences being set at two (2) stories. She also stated
that because the project is near public transportation, it is very generous to think that
each of the families living in the proposed residences will have two (2) vehicles. People
should be asked if they would like to give up one (1) of the parking spaces so that it
could be used for the commercial uses. She then stated that she was for the project.
• Mr.8asu
Mr. 8asu stated that Madison Square has been the topic of discussion for a long time
and the best news is that the City has someone that is willing to finance the project. He
then stated that he has several issues with the project which are as follows:
4
1. Affordable Housing -How does the city safeguard the affordable housing so that it is
available for South Miami residents. Mr. Pepe explained that the development
agreement speaks to the requirements for obtaining housing in the project. Mr.
Basu then asked if there will be a combination of market rate and affordable
housing within the project, of which Mr. Pepe stated no. It will all be affordable
housing.
2. Parking -When it comes to parking, some of the residents will not have two (2)
vehicles. The project is within walking distance to public transportation. He also
feels that this is an opportunity where the community will come together and figure
out how to resolve the parking issue.
3. SW 64th Street -the street has a wide ROW with different uses that allows for
multimodal transportation. Because of that, there should be a comprehensive look
at the corridor.
4. Transitional Zoning -The design is sensitive to the transitional zoning from
commercial to residential. He then asked if the third (3) floor could be set back
further to aid in this transition. If not along SW 64th Street, at least along the SW GOth
Avenue side.
Motion: Dr. Philips moved to approve PB-17"()08 as presented with Staffs recommendations.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Melow.
Ms. Fischer stated that there are more opportunities for affordable housing. To put all the
density into one (1) project is not the right thing to do. Affordable housing should be scattered
throughout the city as opposed to one specific location. She closed by stating that when a large
amount of pressure is applied to a specific project, it will never work out.
Ms. Glavey encouraged everyone to google parking best practices. She then stated that this
would be first time that it was implemented in the City which is an innovative thing to do. She
also recommended that there be car share for the project.
Vote: Yes 5, No 1 (Fischer)
Mr. Melow: Yes
Ms. Glavey: Yes
Mr. Basu: Yes
Ms. Fischer: No
Ms. Kahn: Yes
Dr. Philips: Yes
Motion: Ms. Glavey moved to approve PB-17-DU as presented with Staffs recommendations.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Melow.
Vote: Yes 5, No 1 (Fischer)
Dr. Philips: Yes
Ms. Kahn: Yes
Ms. Fischer: No
Mr. Basu: Yes
Ms. Glavey: Yes
Mr. Melow: Yes
5
Motion: Ms. Glavey moved to approve PB -17-009 as presented with Staff's recommendations .
The motion was seconded by Mr. Melow.
Vote: Yes 5/ No 1 (Fischer)
Mr. Melow : Yes
Ms . Glavey: Yes
Mr. Basu: Yes
Ms . Fischer: No
Ms . Kahn : Yes
Dr. Philips: Yes
Motion: Dr. Philips moved to approve PB-17-0l0 as presented with Staff's recommendations .
The motion was seconded by Ms . Kahn .
Vote: Yes 5/ No 1 (Fischer)
Dr . Philips: Yes
Ms . Kahn: Yes
Ms . Fischer : No
Mr. Basu : Yes
Ms . Glavey: Yes
Mr. Melow: Yes
6 . PB-17-013
Applicant: City of South Miami
A Resolution
V. Public Comments/New Business
The Chairperson opened the floor to public comments and any new business.
Public Comments Section
Iicable
In(',.p:~c:p in the
• Commissioner Walter Harris stat ed th at the Commission had already d ecided that the building
would be set at three (3) stories a nd that he was working with the City Attorney to craft
6
language to that effect. Ms. Fischer stated that the Board approved a height of four (4) stories
with a recommendation for three (3) stories.
• Bishop Jones, Marice Chael, and Levy Kelly each approached the podium and thanked the Board
for their vote on the items before them.
New Business Section
• Ms. Fischer stated that eleven (11) out of ninety-one (91) units in the Metro South building
across from City Hall have been allocated to South Miami residents. After looking into why this
was the case, she found out that the building only had a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy.
Because of that the company managing the building doesn't have to disclose any information
until the Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. She then stated that she still wants to know
how any units will be allocated to South Miami and that she would like to see that a majority of
those units allocated for South Miami residents.
The Chairperson closed the floor to public comments and any new business.
VI. Approval of the Minutes
1. Special Planning Board Meeting Minutes of March 22, 2017:
The Board unanimously approved the meeting minutes with changes. There was no motion
held for the action.
2. Regular Plannini Board Meeting Minutes of March 14,2017
The Board unanimously approved the meeting minutes with changes. There was no motion
held for the action.
VII. Future Meeting Date:
A) Regular Meeting -June 13,2017 at 7:00 P.M.
VIII. Adjournment
Motion: Dr. Philips moved to approve PB-17-010 as presented with Staffs recommendations. The
motion was seconded by Ms. Kahn.
Mr. Basu adjourned the meeting at 8:22 P.M.
7
May 18,2017
City of South Miami
Attn: Jane Tompkins, AICP
6130 Sunset Drive
South Miami, FL 33143
THE CITY OF PLEASANT LIVING
SUBJECT: Madison Square West: 5978 SW 64 th Street (folio 09-4025-010-0010), 6415 SW 60th
Avenue (folio 09-4025-010-0030). 6429.SW 60th Avenue (folio 09-4025,.010-0040),
6442 SW 59 th Place (folio 09-4025-01~180), 6420 sW 59 th Place (folio 09-4025-
010-0160), and ~t;ant lots with the following folio· nUlTlbers.: 09-4O~5-010-0050, 09-
4025-010-0020, 09-4025-010-0140, ~nd09-4025-010-0170
Dear Mrs. Tompkins,
This is to certify that the attached ownership list, map and mailing labels are a complete and
accurate representation of the real estate property and property owners within 500 feet radius
of the external boundaries of the subject properties listed above, including the subject property.
This reflects the most current records on the file in Miami-Dade County Property Appraisers'
Office.
Sincerely,
~
Marcus
. Senior Pia
City of South Miami I 6130 Sunset Drive I South Miami, FL 33143-5093
305.663.6338 I southmiamifl.gov
"-: ~.
,Jj-I~l/J
I ~,W ~?7.T.H","CJ.: 'I,
W ,-\~,
. ~. &f
..;~.'
,SW-,:62:r-LO::C:r~:-' "~!:
i:i
"': M;
\D-:
~'
_ .. J.n ...
, .... s:W 'o3'R ir. A-:V .E-.. '.
.~ .-~ .~~~t
iD
i~
~
rL sw : . .s TN O::ci. ~:_
'---~-.. -.
----_ .. _-:.:.:....:..-::.: :;=-::.:.-=--
'/
·/
'.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
Planning and Zoning Department
6130 Sunset Drive; South Miami, Florida 33143
Phone: (305) 663-6326; Fax #: (305) 668-7335
. On Tuesday, May 30, 2017 at 7:00 P.M., the City of South Miami's Planning Board will conduct
public hearings in the City Commission Chambers at the above address on the following items:
1. PB-17-OO8
Appl~caDt: City of South Miami
A Resolution pursuant to Section 2tl-3.5(D)(1) and other applicable provisions of tbe City of South
Miami Land Development Code approving an inerease from two stories to four stories for a Maed-
Use Project on tbe West Madison Square property as legally described hereig.
2. PB-17-009
Applicant: City of South Miami
A Resolution pursuant to Section ZO-3.S(D)(1) and other applicable provisions of tbe City of South
Miami Land Development Code approving an inerease from two storieS to four stories for a Mixed-
Use Project on the East Madison Square property as legally described herein.
3. PB-17-010
Applicant: City of South Miami
A Resolution relating to a request for a variance from Section 20-4.4 and other applicable
provisions of tbe City of South Miami Land Development Code to allow a reduction in the Dumber
of parking spaces provided for a Mixed-Use Project on the East Madison Square property as legally
described herein. ~. .
4. PB-17-011
Applicant: City of South Miami
A Resolutiou reJatibg to a request for a variance from Section 20-4.4 aad other applicable
provisions of tbe· City of South Miami Land Developmen~ Code to aUow a reduction in the Dumber
of parking spaces provided for a·Mixed-Use Project on the West MadiSon Square property as
legally described berein.
S. PB-17-012
Applic~nt: City of South Miami
A Resolution relating to a request for a variance from Section 20-3.5(G) and otber applicable
provisioDs of the City of South Mj.ami Land Development Code to allow an increase in tbe
maximum impervious coverage for a Mixed-Use Project on the East Madison Square property as
legally described berein.
6. PB-17-013
Applicant: City of South Miami
A R~olution relating to a request for a variance from Section 20-3.5(G) and other applicable
provisions of the City of Soutb Miami Land Development Code to allow an increase in the
maximum impervious coverage for a Mixed-Use Project OD the West Madison Square property as
legally described herein.
All interested parties are urged to attend. Objections or expressions of approval may be made in person at the hearing or filed in writing
prior to or at the hearing. The Planning Board reserves the right to recommend to the City Commission whatever the board considers in
the best interest for the area involved. Interested parties requesting information are asked to contact the Plarming and Zoning
Departmeilt by calling 305·663-6326 or writing to the address indicated above. .
You arc hereby advised that if any person desires to appeal any decision ~ade with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or
hearing, such person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the
proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based (F.S. 286.0105). Rder to
hearing number when making any inquiry.
. .....
SW64TH ST
6412
6428
6442
6456
6487
6505
6501
6520
MIAMI DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW
PubflstHld Daily except Saturday, !uqdav and
legal Holidays
Miami, Miami-08Cl& CounIv, Florida
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF MfAMI-DADE:
Before the undersigned authorily personally appeared
MARIA MESA, who on 0IIIh sars Ihat he or she 18 the LEGAL
CLERK, Legal Notices of !he Miami Daily Business Review
INa Miami Review, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday and
Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami in Miami-Dade
COIlIIIy, Florida; Ihat the altached COpy of adveItisemenl,
being a Legal Advertisement of Notice in the matter of
NOnCE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CIlY OF SOUTH MIAMI· P8-17-008. APPLICANT: CITY OF
SOUTH MIAMI· MAY 30, ~17. ETC
In the XXXX Court,
was published in said newspaper in the issues of
06119/2017
Alliant further says that the said Miami Daily Buainess
Reonew is a newspaper published at Miami, in said
Miami-Dade County, Aorida and that the isaid I18W11p8per hils
heretofore been continuously putJlished in. said Miami .Dade .
County, Aorida each day (except Sallmfay, Sunday and
Legal. Holidars) and has been enlered as second .dasa mail
ma\1er al the post ollice ir! MIami in said Miami -Dade County,
Florida. for a period Of ane year neld preoeding Ihe fJrSt
public:atiOll of the 8Uached copy of advet1isemett; and affiant
further sars that he or she has neither paid nor promised any
person, finn or eotpOralion any DISCOunt, rabate, COmmission
or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisament for
Sworn and au me !his
19 day • ' D.201"-.....L/ ~ .
c~~
(SEAl)
MARIA MESA personally known to me
~ , .
/
22SE I I NEIGHBORS
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
COURTESY NOTICE
I SUNDAY MAY U 2017
MIAMIHERAlDLOM
NOTI(''E IS HEREBY 1-ojven Ihallhc Cily Ct'lIIn1i~siun 1'1' Ihl! Cil), uf S(lulh Miami, FII'ricJa will c(lnducl Pt,tolk H"llringfS I ill ii, regular City C(llllnlis~iun m~,'ling
,,,heduled lilr TueWuy. June 6, ::!II17, beginning al 7:1111 p.lII .. ill Ihe CilY ('ummi"il," Chambers, 61311 SIII1'l'1 Drive, I(lcnnsider Ihe fulluwil1g iI"mts):
A RCSllltuillll '1IIthl'rj;rjng the Cily MWlager t('"eg('lillle lind In .ml~r inro II nmlli-ycar ~~'mmcl with Soulh Millmi Youlh BII,ebllll League. In.:. ("SI\'lYBLoOj 1(.1'
the managcmcnl (.f yuulh ha~,'baIl !<en'ice' ill Pahllcr Park.
A Re<llluti(1O authuri.r.ing Ihe City Manager III t.>nter imollllllti-year agreement' wilh Ashbritt.lnc., alld Bcrgcmn Emergen,·y Sl'rvit;c •. lnc., fllr DislI,lcr Debris
Remlll'a! alld Displlsal Sen'ice, thn.ugh a piggyback fn.m a City of NI'11h Milum Beach '·(lntract. '
A R,'slIlutiun nf the Mayur .md City Cumllli"i"n i.f th~ f'ily (If Somh J\·liami. Flnrida. UlIlhnri,dng Ih~ ('ilY Manager 10 ,~X\~culc iI lIIulti-),ear Inter-local
Agreemell\ with Miami-Dade CI.unty. and Ihe Miami-Dade Plllice Dcparlln,'nr, fur Schll(,1 Cnossing Gmud Services.
A Rcs()lulillllllJlpmvillg II Ullity "I'Title tilr the PTClpenie, LllcalL~d ul :'i9n SW M" Street (f"lillUIl-4(12:'i-IIW-IJ(J!U). MI5 SW 60'" Avenue I folio W-4U:!5-
1I11l-II113(h , M29 SW foil'· A YCIIIIl~ O'.li" t14-41I::!5-11 III-lItl4(l,. fo44! SW 59'" Place ([(.IiIlIIlJ-411!;;-1l1tl-1J I Mh, M:!IJ S W 51)"' PIH':~ (f(llit' /J9-41125-UIII-1l I 611). und
"II.:ant lilts with tht' fulll.wing fulin lIumbers: (JIJ~(l2S-l11 (l-11I/5Il, 1I'1-411:!5-11 I II-l 111211, ()I,I-41125-11 J (I-U 14(J, IIntlIJll-4112;-IIJ 11-111711.
A ResllJution appmving: 1\ Unily of Title fllr the Pmpcni .... Lucalcd 011 51144 SW C\4,h Slre~1 ifuJiIJ OI)-4112!i-1I1 (I-U:!7IlJ, MUJ SW ;;11 Pia'· ... ,l"lill U'J-4I/:!:'i-1I10-
(elilll, Mil SW 5'1 Place (fl,li" (lo)-4f1:!;-(lIIl-n~Q(h. MI:'i SW 5,,110 Plan' lIi.lillll')-41J:!5-UJII..tf\IIlII. ,1\'lIcnlll 10'1 wilh II f,'linnumbt·r(.11J9-41125-IIJiI-It3IIJ. allli
6443 SW 511 Place Ullli(' 1111-4U2S-IIJ11-0321ll.
A Resuhnion pursuant fl' Sectil'JI ::!11-3.5(DJ( I) and other applicable pnl\'isi['ns [.f the CilY oJ Sl'uth Miami Land DC"dnpmcnt Cude appmving: an illcrease frum
IW,. stllries III fllur slUries lilr II Mixed-V,c PrnjeclIlIlllll' Wesl :\Iladi",'n Square pmperty a< legally descrihl!d hcrein,
A Reslllutil'\1 pursuillll to. Sedinn :!1l-3.5())( II ilnd (liher upplicllble pnlVisil'ns IIf the City ('1' SI'ulh Miami Lantl Devcl('pmelll Cllde appn'vin~ lin incfCasc frum
two ~1I.ries III f(.ur sll.ries fill' a Mixed-ll~e Prnject (.n Ihe Ea~1 Madi"lII Square properry I" legi\lJy des.:rihl'd herein.
A Re<,liulion relating II' a rcqu",1 f,'r a \'ariancc fll'ln Sccti(," 211-4.4 and Illher appli.:ablc pf(l\'i~i(ln' III' Ihe C'ily 1)1' SIIUlh Miami Land J)evd,'pmenl C'",lt, III
ulln\\" ~ Te\luclillll in the number III' parking spll.:es pru"ill~d li.r II Mix"'ll-llsc Pn 'jecllln Ih., East Madi~un S'lu~rr pr',perty ,IS "'gally describ.,d hen,in.
A Re\"lutil'n rela(illg "' a re'juesl fur a "arian1:c ffllm Sl.'o:lillO 2U-4.4 ,md "ther appJiuhk [lrlwisioll' 1'1' the City ,.f Snuth Miami Land Dewlt'pnlelll C,,,le II'
all(lw a reducliun in the nUlllm'r Ilf parking Spil~'C" pru,·idell f('r a Mixell-Usc PrnjC1:1 Ull the We't Mallblln Square pmpeny a' legally (It:s.:rihed herein.
I A Re~I.lutiun relating II) a relJur~1 fur a varian"., fnlln SCl'liulI 20-35(0,1 anu lither lIJlplkllble pl'Ilvi,i(ln, IIf th,' CilY Ill' S"ulh l\'liami Land De,','lllpmcnl CO!lr' \10 allnw an increa,c in the ma."'(inllllll impervious cI.vcrage fl'r iI Mixt'd-l:,~ PfI~ie~t on the Ea\1 Madison Square properl)' 1I~ leg<1lly de'.:rihctl h,'rein. /
A Rcslliulinn relating tl'lI reLluesl for II "ari,lIlcc fN,"1 SeL·lilln2!1-3.:'i(G., and I'ther i1pplicilbk prnvisillll' !lfthc Cily III' SI'ul.h Miami Lalld De'Vcl('pmcllt C,.d,'
til alluw ,UI incrca. ... , illihe maximum imperviuus c(l\'erage lilr 1I Mixl.'ll-l1se Pmjed lin the We<t Madis(l1I Squarc pll.perry II_ lcgally cJescrihed her ... in.
A Rc,"luli(l\I Huthori.dllg the Cily Malla!,!cr 1(1 ellter inlll II mUlti-year a~'f ... emenl with Liml'u.illc, (If Suulh F1urida. Inc., fllr il )luhlk trdnSp"naliun cin'uliUllr
,.:r"io:e, by piggybacking 111111' its l~l\Uract wilh Ihe Cily of A \lelllma.
An Ordinan~e amending the LWid I>~velnpnlenl C\ldc. Artic:J~ II, Sel·til'" 211-2.3. "Defillitiolls·· and Anicl~ Ill. S~.:lillll :!(l-.~.6 "Supplemental Regulalillns"
adlling suhse,·tilln (WI "Sular Requirement<" ,md )lnl\'idin!,! delinithlJl~ rdating II' and ~Tileria and r .. glliatil.n~ h'r sular o:(J)let:lllrs illihe City IlfSI'mh Mi:mli.
An Ordinance amending Ihl' Cil), of Slluth Miami Lalld D,','elol'lnCIII C\ldc. Arlide IV. Se.:ti,'" 211-4.7 iB, III darif)' the intcnl (If Ihi, s,'cti(lIIlll include
cOlllmercial prupenies alld by adding sub.ectilIIlIK) ttl pno\'ide h'r <.:rcl'"ing nf the illteri,'r ('1' ,'a,'HIII c('mmercial pfllprn).
All Ordinan.:e relating II' lilt! City's 21117 Jiscal year hudg~t: 1I111horil.illg <UI in~r,'ase 1'1' appn'l'riatiuIIs f1'r expenditure Iillr item 125-173(1-541-.\4:0;11 Pruplt.'·~
TrallSI'On>llil'lI Tax Funll Din'ct Trilllsit Cunlr"clual ScrviLr, ,1\"(:\111111 in Ihe ,mll'lIllt "I' S7tl.~IIlI,
ALL interNed I)anie~ are in"ilcd III ,mend and ,,·iIl be heard.
FI'r furl her illfurmilliull. pleilse cunla.:t Ih,' City CI~rk' s ()1liL'c m: .~05-M~-t\34(J.
Maria M. M~II~\I(le/. CMC
CilY Clt'rk
PUf'llilnllO r:lurld.1 SI.llllIC~ .!~C • .il103. Ih: ('tly brrrh) .lIlviS\'" Ih"IJullht Ih~'1 II .1 J)\:'r .. ,·n ,1,,'\.",,);:, 10 ;lrrr.al .. U1\" den"!,,n m~ltli' hy lh,' SCI,ar,) .\;:rrn:y or C'1mnn,,",ur. \\'lIh fC"f'Cl.'lll1 an~ n1aIlL-r L'nn'ld':I'~1I
III 11,. mCcllll),! .11" bCilnn:,. be ~'r .. h\' '\IJlII~1!lI a rr.:rolll ullb .. ~ rr(J..:.:cdin~,. lind Ihill f •• r '111..h rUII'I)'l', an~io.:h.'t.I pr;:r"uh m:ly IIl'L·t.! h' ~!II"IIJC (hell Ct \I.'rl'alm~ rCL'lln:lllf Ihi" rt'In.·("Lljng.~ j .. lII ... d~ uhkh rL"md
tIIdlltk~ .. Ib~ Ic<umunr iand c,,·,JCU\'\.' nr(.ln "hlL'h I~ ilrre.II, .. In "'~ b."c.J
MIAMI CAlLY BUSINESS REVIEW
p"b~~h"CJ D~ll,. CKeC'Il' &lllndlrt, Suntl:-v.'lnCI
l(.'9a1t~'
~ ~·,bIJlU·I)3ClP County. FIQr<l:l.,.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE:
Before Ihe unde ...... g ... ed aulhDflly personalt;" appCilred
MARIA MESA. whO 011 oath. saVa Ihal he 01 she Is Ihe LEGAL
CLERK legsl Notices or Ihe Ml8ml Daily Business Review
fNa MIami ReVIew. a dally (except Saturday. SUnday and
Legal HoiIday&1 ne.-.wapet, pUblIShed al MIami In Miami ·~de
County, Florida, thai the attached copy of advertisement.
berng II legal Ad\lfJrtisemenl of Notice 'n the malter of
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI .. JUNE 6. 2017
In 1118 XXXX CQUfI.
was published In lI8id neWSpaper in Ihe l&Sues of
05/19/21)1;
.o,'(l8nl further says thai the said Miami Deily BUSIness
R&I\ew " a newspaper pubhh8'J al MI8mI, in said
MIBm;.DlIlje COunty. FIotIdA and thai the sald newspaper ha5
heretofore been conUnuously publtshed In said Miaml·Dade
County. r-Iorida e8ch day (except Saturday. Sunday and
l~al HOlIdays) and has beer. entered as seeond class m8l1
maltet al 't'Ie PIUI offiCe III Miami If'! said Miam.-D4de County,
F'101l(ip. for 8 period of one yew nald Precedmg lite first
putIJ,eah()t\ 01 Ihe sllIIChed CCij)y 01 Mvertisement. and affiem
fur1her says Il"al he 01 she has nerther oaid nor promised any
p~SOn. firm or eorporetlOn an~' d.scoutll. rebate. commieslOn
for ~f secufltlg Itns 8dver1lSOmeonl tor
'SEAL)
MARIA. MESA DersOflstI'/ known 10 me
~,\\\\"III1II1''',,,,~ ~~~~.~~~
;;; ~~~oo '%, ! :~~~C~oo '\ E:J "b.~~ S*~ ...... :*5 ~'f;'" GII_" o~o ~ ~ o~Io'd~~ 0" ;: ~~O"~f'InI,,,,~o~1 ~",:J!i4C:S1;it. 6 ~,~ ~""""""\\\"~
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NonCE IS HEREBY g""'" Ihel lhe CitY CommIasion of Ihe CitY of Sou"
MiBmI. Flortda win conduct Pu'blc Hearingls) Qt jll regular City CommIsSIon
moeting .. ""dilled forTueoday, June 6, 2017, beginning .,7:00 p,m .. In "10 ~I)'
Comml .. lon Cham_. 6130 s_.Il1Ne, 10 consider !he following ftemls}:
A ResolutiOn au1horlzllll !he Oily Manager 10 negoOate and 10 en.or 11110
• multi.year contract vri1n South Miami Youth easeb8li League, Inc .
\OSMYBL 0) for too management of youth balIeban .arvlcas at Palmer Perk.
A ResOlution author\Zll1g 1M CIIy Manager 10 en •• r Into muftl·year
agreements _ Ashbritt. Iu:., and Bergeron Emergency ServIces. Inc .•
fOr ~ DebrIs _ end Ofsposal-_h e piggybaCk
from EI City of NClrth Miami Baach contract.
A AesoMton of the Mayor and City CommllSSlon ot tl1e City of South
Miami. FlOrida. 8UlhaiZ:in9 the Cty Manager to eX9CUle 8 muln-year lnIer40Cal
A41f-witII Mfaml-Dado CourIIy. and !he MIa1ri-De<le PolIce Cepanmen1,
""_ Qos6Ing GuanI_·
A ResolutiOn approvfng a Unity of Title for the Properties Located al
5978 SW 64lh S!reO.\loro OS·4025·0,Q.l)01Oj. 64.5 sw 601h Avenue
(fol1o 09-4025-010-0030) ,6429 SW 801h Avenue (I0Il0 09-4025-010·0040),
6442 SW 591h Ple .. (foIfo (]9.4025-010-o,8O), 6420 sw 59th Place\loIio
09-4025-0,Q.l)18O), and vacant lOIs wilh .. e foUow/ng folio numt>ers:
09.4025.0.1J.IlO50, 09.4025-0'0·0020, 09-4025-010-0140. and 09-4025·
0.0-0.10,
A Resolution approvIng II Unity 6t TI'" for the PropertieS Loeeted at
5944 SW 64" 5 .... (fOlIO 09-4025-011l-027Oj. 8401 SW 59 PlaCelfollo
09-4Q2!H),Q.l)281l), 6411 SW 59 Place (folio 09 .. 025-0.0-1)2901. 84.S
SW 59lh __ \1050 09-4025,010-0300). e v...., •••• -a tollo_ ....
of 09.4025-o.0.()3'O, end 6443 SW 59 Place (folio 09"025·0.0·0320).
A _ pu!SUIII1f '" SectIon 20-3.5(0)11) end o!her eppllceble
provisIoos of the City of _ M\eml Lend Dm\opI1IOI1I COde approving
an /nt:ntaS8 from two storieS to fo.Ir stories for a Mbted-Uaa ~ on
... w ... MadiBon Square properly 85legatl, d .. crfbe<l-
(
A ResolutiOn pursuant to Section 20-3.6(O){1) and' o;er 8pp11cab'9
provisIoos 01 the City 01 _ Miami Land llsveIoP"'ent COda approving
an InCrease hom 1'110 slorios to lour st0tie8 for a Mixed-Use Project on the
EastMadlson Squef8ProJ)OI1y aslegal1ydesaibed _n,
A Reeolullon refatlng 10 a request lor a variance from Section 20·4,4 and
""'" ~ provIslon5 .llhe Oily 01 Sout. MIomI Land Oavel."",,,,,
Code 10 allow a reduction in the number of parking spaces provided lor
• Mixed-U,e ProI<ct on IIlo Eas. Mad;oon Square ".,petty as Iegal~
delcnbed herein.
A Resolution retating 10 a request for a variance from Section 20·4,4 m1CI
01"" .P~ ,.....,..... .1"'" City 01 _ MlomIlBnd lleYo1opmen1
Code to ullow a reduction in lI'Ie number of parklng spaces provided for
a MIxed-Use Project on the West Madison Square ptOJ:JQrty 89 legally
descrtbed herein.
A R9S01ut1on tele11ng '0 • _ ... ,., a villi"''' from Section 20·3,5(G) and
oilier applicable PI_OIlS 0I111e Cily of _ Miami Land Dovel_en!
COde to allOw an increase in the maximum impervious coverage lor 8
Milled-USe ProIect on the East MadiIOn Square propeny os legally
described herein.
A RelOlution relating 10 a reque&t lor e variance from Section 20-3.510) and
o1I1er appli<:able provisions 0I11lo CI1y 01 Sou111 Miami Land DeveIopmen1
Code to allow an illCt88Se In too rnaximWn Impervious coverage 'or a
Mlxed·Use Profecl on the west Madison Square property as I8gaIly
described herein.
An Ordlnante amending lila Land Development Code. ArtIcle II. Section
20-2.3, °eerO!Wons' and_IP. _ 20·3.6·_ R __ •
eddIIIg ........ "'" (WI ·SoIa RequIn!men1s' and providing clef .. """"
relatfng 10 and cnleria ard regulations for SOlat coUectors in the City of
Soulh Mlaml.
An Ordinance amending the City at South Miami Land Oeve!opmenl
Coda, Article IV. Sedlon 20".7 (11110 Clarify .he In,.", of this Section 10
inClude commerciaJ ptOPerlies and by adding subsection (IQ 10 provide
for screening of the Interior of vacanl commercial property.
ALL Inlereatecf parUas ere Invited 10 attend and win be heard.
For rurther information. please contact tho City Clerk's Office at:
_-6:140,
Maria M. Menendez. CMC
CIIyClOrl<
Pursuan.'o Florida SllItuIos 286.0.05, IIlo City henlby ._ the pul>llc
'11a1 if a person d_ 10 eppoaI any decision mad8 by this _,.Agency
or CommIssIon with respecl 10 any maltBt consIdentd at its meting Of
hearing. he or she will need a record of the proceedlngs. and that for such
purpose, affected person may need 10 ensure that a verbatim record of the
p:oceedlngs is made which record includes the les1imony and evidence
upon which tho eppeal is to be based.
5/.9 17 ·.0&10000226232M