20THE CITY OF PLEASANT LIVING
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
To: The Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Commission
VIA: Steven Alexander, City Manager
FROM: Jane K. Tompkins, AICP, Planning Director
Date: June 6, 2017
SUBJECT:
1. A Resolution pursuant to Section 20-3.5(D)(I) and other applicable provisions
of the City of South Miami Land Development Code approving an increase from two
stories to four stories for a Mixed-Use Project on the East Madison Square property
as legally described herein.
2. A Resolution relating to a request for a variance from Section 20-4.4 and other
applicable provisions of the City of South Miami Land Development Code to allow a
reduction in the number of parking spaces provided for a Mixed-Use Project on tbe East
Madison Square property as legally described herein.
3. A Resolution approving a Unity of Title for the Properties Located at 5944 SW 64 th
Street (folio 09-4025-010-0270),6401 SW 59 Place (folio 09-4025-010-0280), 6411 SW 59
Place (folio 09-4025-010-0290), 6415 SW 59 th Place (folio 09-4025-010-0300), a vacant lot
with a folio number of 09-4025-010-0310, and 6443 SW 59 Place (folio 09-4025-010-0320).
BACKGROUND:
The South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) owns approximately 1.2 acres of
property on the south side of SW 64th Street generally referred to as Madison Square. The
CRA's planning document designates the area for a mixed-use redevelopment proposal that will
create an anchor for the north end of SW 59 th Place and help stimulate revitalization efforts in
the area.
For the purposes of the development review, the property is described as either East or West
Madison Square, with SW 59 th Place serving as the divider. This memo focuses on the zoning
requests for East Madison Square; the West Madison Square requests are addressed in a
separate memo. The East property consists of six (6) parcels on the south side of SW 64th Street
and the east side of SW 59 th Place as shown in the highlighted area below:
Madison Square -East Parcel
Special Use and Variance Applications
5944 SW 64 Street
June 6, 2017
Page 2 of 9
Subject Property located 6401 SW 59 th Place
The properties total 19,653 square feet in size (net) and are identified on the City's maps as
5944 SW 64th Street, 6429 SW 59 th Place, 6443 SW 59 th Place, and three vacant parcels that
have not been assigned a street number1 .
All the parcels are zoned "SR" Specialty Retail. A strip of land along the east edge of 5944 SW 64 th
Street is also part of the Community Service Overlay area. The City's Future Land Use Map (FLUM)
designates all the parcels as "Mixed-Use Commercial Residential (Four-Story)".
I The Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser's website identifies these vacant parcels as 6401 SW 59 tl1 Place , 6411
SW 59 th Place, and 6415 SW 59 th Place .
JKT
Z:\Commission Items\2017\06-06-2017\Madison Square East\Madison Square East CM Memo 06062017.docx
Madison Square -East Parcel
Special Use and Variance Applications
5944 SW 64 Street
June 6, 2017
Page 3 of 9
... _._._._.,.1_ ....
6429
~42
450
Zoning Map Excerpt Future Land Use Map Excerpt
Surrounding land uses, zoning and FLUM designations are as follows:
Land Use Zoning FlUM
Vacant and RS-4 and RS-4 * Single-Family Residential
North Single-Family (Two-Story) and Mixed-Use
Commercial Residential
(Four-Story)
South Church RS-4* Single-Family (Two-Story)
Church Parking RS-4* Mixed-Use Commercial
East Lot Residential (Four-Story) and
Single-Family Residential
(Two-Story)
Vacant and SR Mixed-Use Commercial
West Commercial Residential (Four-Story)
Building
* Community Service Overlay
The City of South Miami is proposing a mixed-use project for Madison Square. The East property
will consist of approximately 3,566 square feet of commercial space on the ground floor and
twenty (20) residential units on the second and third floors (ten units per floor). The proposed
uses are permitted in the SR district (see Land Development Code (LDC) Sec. 20-3.3(0)).
The residential component will be developed and maintained as affordable units pursuant to an
agreement between the CRA and the developer. The commercial space will be divided into four
(4) separate tenant bays .
JKT
Z:\Commission Items\2017\06-06-2017\Madison Square East\Madison Square East CM Memo 06062017.docx
Madison Square -East Parcel
Special Use and Variance Applications
5944 SW 64 Street
June 6,2017
Page 4 of 9
Twenty-six (26) parking spaces will be available on-site. Pursuant to Section 20-4.4 of the LOC,
five (5) spaces on SW 64th Street can be credited to the project for a total of thirty-one (31) spaces.
A bus stop located on SW 59 th Place prohibits the development of additional on-street spaces.
A landscape buffer separates the parking lot from the properties to the south and east. The site
plan complies with the setback, FAR and impervious coverage standards of the LOC.
The attached exhibit contains the plans for both the East and the West properties. Sheet AO.1
illustrates the concept plan for both the East and the West properties. Sheets AO.2(E), A1.2.1,
and A1.2.2 provide the site plan, floor lay-out and conceptual elevations for the East side.
REQUEST:
As proposed, the project requires the following approvals, which are described and analyzed
below:
1. A Special Use to allow a height of three-stories.
2. A Variance to allow a reduction in the number of parking spaces provided.
3. A Unity of Title
ANALYSIS:
1. A Special Use to allow a height of three-stories.
The SR zoning district allows a height of four stories or fifty (50) feet. This provision is limited,
however, by Section 20-3.5(0) Properties Abutting Single-Family Zoning Districts of the LOC
which states:
(1) Notwithstanding the dimensional requirements of the zoning use district in which a
property is located, if that property is abutting (common border or separated by a right-
of-way) to a single-family zoning district the maximum height of any new building or any
vertical addition to an existing building on that property is limited to two stories,
however, additional height may be obtained via the special use permit process as set
forth in Section 20-5.8.
As noted above, the project abuts a single-family zoning district on three sides (north, east and
south) and is designed at three (3) stories.
Special Use applications are controlled by LOC Section 20-5.8 Special use approvals, as follows:
(1) Prior to approving a special use, the city commission shall find that such use meets the
conditional requirements set forth in Section 20-3.4 and that it:
JKT
Z:\Commission Items\2017\06-06-2017\Madison Square East\Madison Square East CM Memo 06062017.docx
Madison Square -East Parcel
Special Use and Variance Applications
5944 SW 64 Street
June 6,2017
Page 5 of 9
(a) Will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the
vicinity of the proposed use;
(b) Will not be detrimental to the public welfare or property or improvements in the
neighborhood; and
(c) Complies with all other applicable Code provisions.
(2) Additional Conditions. The city commission may designate such additional conditions in
connection with a special use as will, in its opinion, assure that such use will conform to
the foregoing requirements.
The conditional requirements of Section 20-3.4 include general requirements that apply to all
applications as well as special requirements that apply to specific types of special uses. There
are no special requirements for allowing additional stories, so only the general requirements
apply:
(1) All such uses shall comply with all requirements established in the appropriate zone use
district, unless additional or more restrictive requirements are set forth below or by the
City Commission.
(2) All such uses shall be determined to be of a compatible and complementary nature with
any existing, planned or anticipated surrounding uses.
(3) A public hearing shall be held by the City Commission to determine the overall
compatibility of the use with the surrounding neighborhood.
(4) If a special use is, in the future, determined by the Director of the Planning and Zoning
Department or the City Commission, to be adversely affecting the health, safety or
welfare, including quiet enjoyment, of persons residing or working in the vicinity of the
proposed use, or otherwise to be detrimental to the public welfare or property or
improvements in the surrounding neighborhood, or to be not in compliance with any
other applicable Code provisions, the special use approval may be modified, with
conditions of approval revised or added to alleviate such adverse effect, or revoked by
the City Commission upon notification and public hearing.
STAFF RESPONSE:
After review of the project, the proposed building complies with conditions and requirements
listed in both Section 20-5.8(B) and 20-3.4(A) of the LDC in that:
JKT
o Increasing the height of the building from two (2) stories to three (3) should not adversely
affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the area, nor will it be
detrimental to the public welfare or property or improvements in the neighborhood;
o The proposed building complies with other applicable Code provisions regarding size and
setbacks;
o While most buildings in the area are single-story, the nearby churches have elements or
architectural features that are comparable in height to the proposed building;
Z:\Commission Items\2017\06-06-2017\Madison Square East\Madison Square East CM Memo 06062017.docx
Madison Square -East Parcel
Special Use and Variance Applications
5944 SW 64 Street
June 6, 2017
Page 6 of 9
o The proposed building is of a compatible and complimentary nature with the existing,
planned or anticipated surrounding uses.
Finally, Section 20-5.8(C) of the LDC provides that an approval shall lapse after six (6) months if
not master building permit which implements the special use has been issued for such use. The
City Commission may specify a longer approval period for good cause.
PLANNING BOARD ACTION:
Following a public hearing on May 30,2017, the Planning Board voted five (5) ayes to one (1)
nay to recommend approval of the special use with Staff's recommended conditions.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Commission approve the special use application with the
following conditions:
1. That the building be limited to three (3) stories in height; and
2. That the project is developed in substantial compliance with the plans prepared by Fanjul
& Associates, LLC and attached to this memo.
Further, Staff recommends that the City Commission consider a longer approval period to ensure
the developer adequate time to obtain the master building permit.
2. Variance to allow a reduction in the number of parking spaces provided.
The proposed project consists of approximately 3,566 sf of commercial space and twenty (20)
housing units. Based on this design, a total of fifty-four (54) parking spaces are required per
Section 20-4.4 of the LDC:
Retail Parking Spaces Required
3,566 S-.-F-. 1 Parking Space
1 x 300 S-.-F-. ~ 12 Parking Spaces
Plus
Residential Parking Spaces Required
20 ~ 2 Parking Space
1 x Y-tJi.t ~ 40 Parking Spaces
JKT
Z:\Commission Items\2017\06-06-2017\Madison Square East\Madison Square East CM Memo 06062017.docx
Madison Square -East Parcel
Special Use and Variance Applications
5944 SW 64 Street
June 6, 2017
Page 7 of 9
Plus
20 w:Hf.5. 1 Visitor Parking Space
1 x 10.fJ-ffits. ~ 2 Visitor Parking Spaces
TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: 12 + 40 + 2 = 54
Thirty-one (31) spaces are shown on the proposed site plan, for a shortage of twenty-three (23)
spaces. Of the thirty-one (31) spaces available, twenty-two (22) will be allocated for the
residential units (Le., one space per unit plus two visitor spaces); the remaining nine (9) spaces
will be allocated for the commercial tenant(s). The City and CRA are negotiating with the nearby
churches to provide additional parking for the project. However, since the negotiations have not
been finalized a variance approval is necessary.
Pursuant to Section 20-5.9 of the LDC, a variance for off-street parking can be reviewed and
permitted by the City Commission at a public hearing, after a recommendation by the Planning
Board. Variance decisions shall be based on an affirmative finding as to each of the following
criterion:
JKT
1. The variance is necessary to relieve particular extraordinary conditions relating to a
specific property;
Response: The site's small size and dimensions make this a particularly challenging site
to develop.
2. Denial of the variance would result in hardship to the owner. Hardship results if the
restriction of the zoning ordinance, when applied to a particular property, becomes
arbitrary, confiscatory or unduly oppressive because of conditions of the property that
distinguish it from other properties under similar zoning restrictions;
Response: Development of the property is limited by its size, dimensions, and the code
requirements that limit height and impervious coverage. These factors combine to make
it difficult to comply with the parking requirements. Further, denial of the variance will
impede the development of much needed affordable housing for South Miami and
commercial tenants that will offer essential goods and services within walking distance of
many residents.
3. The extraordinary conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the
applicant;
Response: The neighborhood was platted with small, narrow lots that make it difficult to
assemble sites large enough to accommodate a mixed-use development that complies
Z:\Commission Items\2017\06-06-2017\Madison Square East\Madison Square East CM Memo 06062017.docx
Madison Square -East Parcel
Special Use and Variance Applications
5944 SW 64 Street
June 6, 2017
Page 8 of 9
with all the current LDC requirements and meets the community's objectives.
Consequently, the extraordinary conditions and circumstances do not result from the
actions of the applicant.
4. The requested variance is the minimum variance necessary to make possible the
reasonable use of the land, building or structure;
Response: The project is designed to help achieve the community's goal of providing as
many affordable units as possible, while still being sensitive to the scale of the
surrounding neighborhood and limiting impacts on the nearby neighborhood. While a
parking structure might allow additional parking, it's unli,kely that a structure would fit on
the property2. Further, if a structure was physically possible, the building would be
disproportionate and out of keeping with the character of the neighborhood.
Consequently, the requested variance is the minimum necessary to make possible the
reasonable use of the land.
5. That the approval of the variance will be consistent with the general intent and purpose
of the land Development Code, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or
otherwise detrimental to the public welfare.
Response: The purpose of the SR district is lito maintain the basic specialty retail character
of the Sunset Drive commercial area by encouraging comparison retail uses at the
pedestrian-oriented grade level and office and residential uses on the upper floors of all
buildings" (Sec. 20-3.1(14)). All other properties with an SR designation are in the
Hometown District Overlay and, as such, are allowed a twenty-five percent (25%) parking
reduction for mixed-use buildings. Parking reductions for mixed-use buildings are not
uncommon. If that reduction were applied to this project, only forty-one (41) spaces
would be required. Consequently, approval of the variance will be consistent with the
general intent and purpose of the LDC and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or
otherwise detrimental to the public welfare.
Finally, Section 20-5.9(A), Expiration of Variance Approvals of the LDC provides that variances
shall lapse after one (1) year if no building permit has been applied for in accordance with the
request and if the City Commission has not specified a longer approval period for good cause
shown.
PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION:
Following a public hearing on May 30,2017, the Planning Board voted five (5) ayes to one (1) nay
to recommend approval of the requested variance.
2 For additional information about the sizing requirements of parking structures, please refer to:
http://www.timhaahs.comlparkingdatabase/what -are-some-typ ical-standards-for-parking -garage-functional-desi gn/
JKT
Z:\Commi ssi on Items\2017\06-06-2 017\Madison Square East\Madison Square Ea st eM Memo 06062017 .docx
Madison Square -East Parcel
Special Use and Variance Applications
5944 SW 64 Street
June 6, 2017
Page 9 of 9
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Commission approve the variance application.
3. Unity of Title
Section 20-5.16 of the LDC provides that a unity oftitle shall be required in certain specified cases,
including:
* * *
2. Whenever the building site consists of more than one lot or parcel and the main
building is located on one or more of the lots or parcels and the remaining lots or parcels
encompassing the building site are required to meet the minimum zoning requirements.
* * *
The proposed site plan shows the mixed-use building on multiple lots, with the remaining lots
providing parking and a separation from the single-family district to the south.
Attachments:
* Site plan
* Resolution approving the special use
* Resolution approving the variance
* Resolution approving the unity of title
JKT
Z:\Commission Items\2017\06-06-2017\Madison Square East\Madison Square East CM Memo 06062017.docx
1 RESOLUTION NO. _______ _
2
3 A Resolution pursuant to Section 20-3.5(D)(1) and other applicable provisions of the
4 South Miami Land Development Code approving an increase from two stories to four
5 stories for a Mixed-Use Project on the East Madison Square property as legally
6 described herein.
7
8 WHEREAS, the South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency (SMCRA) owns several
9 parcels on the south side of SW 64 th Street and east of SW 59 th Place, as follows: 5944 SW 64 th Street
10 (folio 09-4025-010-0270), 6401 SW 59 th Place (folio 09-4025-010-0280), 6411 SW 59 th Place (folio 09-
11 4025-010-0290), 6415 SW 59 th Place (folio 9-4025-010-0300),6443 SW 59 th Place (folio 09-4025-010-
12 0320) and a vacant lot with folio number 09-4025-010-0310) (collectively referred to as "East Madison
13 Square"); and
14
15 WHEREAS, the parcels are all zoned "SR" Specialty Retail and a small strip of 5944 SW 64 th
16 Street is SR with the Community Service Overlay; and
17
18 WHEREAS, the SR district allows a maximum building height offour (4) stories or fifty (50) feet
19 pursuant to Section 20-3 .5G ofthe Land Development Code (LDC); and
20
21 WHEREAS, LDC Section 20-3 .5(D) provides that, if a property is abutting a single-family zoning
22 district the maximum height of any new building on that property is limited to two stories, however,
23 additional height may be obtained via the Special Use process set forth in Section 20-5.8; and
24
25 WHEREAS, the South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency (SMCRA) has submitted
26 application PB-17-0 10 requesting a Special Use approval to develop a three (3) story, mixed-use project on
27 the site; and
28
29 WHEREAS, adjacent to the site on the north, south and east are single-family residential districts;
30 and
31
32 WHEREAS, Section 20-3.5(D)(I) stipUlates that additional project height may be obtained via the
33 Special Use permit process as set forth in Section 20-5.8, the pertinent parts of which are as follows:
34
35 20-5.8 Special use approvals.
36 (B)Required Conditions.
37 (1) Prior to approving a special use, the city commission shall find that such use meets the
38 conditional requirements set forth in Section 20-3.4 and that it
39 (a) Will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the
40 vicinity of the proposed use;
41 (b) Will not be detrimental to the public welfare or property or improvements in the
42 neighborhood; and
43 (c) Complies with all other applicable Code provisions.
44 (2) Additional Conditions. The city commission may designate such additional conditions in
45 connection with a special use as will, in its opinion, assure that such use will conform to
46 the foregoing requirements.
47
48 WHEREAS, Section 20-3.4 sets forth general requirements for Special Use approvals as well as
49 special requirements for specific types of uses; and .
50
51 WHEREAS, the general requirements of Section 20-3.4 are as follows:
52
53 (1) All such uses shall comply with all requirements established in the appropriate zoning district,
54 unless additional or more restrictive requirements are set forth below or by the City
55 Commission.
56 (2) All such uses shall be determined to be of a compatible and complementary nature with any
57 existing, planned or anticipated surrounding uses.
58 (3) A public hearing shall be held by the City Commission to determine the overall compatibility
59 of the use with the surrounding neighborhood.
60 (4) If a special use is, in the future, determined by the Director of the Planning and Zoning
61 Department or the City Commission, to be adversely affecting the health, safety or welfare,
62 including quiet enjoyment, of persons residing or working in the vicinity of the proposed use,
63 or otherwise to be detrimental to the public welfare or property or improvements in the
64 surrounding neighborhood, or to be not in compliance with any other applicable Code
65 provisions, the special use approval may be modified, with conditions of approval revised or
66 added to alleviate such adverse effect, or revoked by the City Commission upon notification
67 and public hearing.
68
69 WHEREAS, Section 20-3.4 does not provide any specific requirements for a Special Use approval
70 pertaining to an increase in the number of stories; and
71
72 WHEREAS, Section 20-5.8(C) of the LDC provides that an approval shall lapse after six (6)
73 months ifno master building permit which implements the Special Use has been issued for such use. The
74 City Commission may specifY a longer approval period for good cause; and
75
76 WHEREAS, the Special Use review process requires a recommendation from the Planning Board
77 and the approval ofthe City Commission after a public hearing; and
78
79 WHEREAS, at the May 30, 2017 special meeting, the Planning Board following a public hearing,
80 voted to recommend approval application PB-17-010 by a vote of five (5) ayes, one (1) nay; with two
81 conditions: (1) that the project be limited to three (3) stories; and (2) that the site be developed in substantial
82 compliance with the plans prepared by Fanjul & Associates, LLC and attached hereto as "Exhibit A"; and
83
84 WHEREAS, staff and the Planning Board also recommend that the approval period be extended
85 beyond six (6) months.
86
87 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR Al'/"D CITY COMMISSION
88 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA THAT:
89
90 Section 1: Application PB-17-010 submitted by the applicant, the South Miami Community
91 Redevelopment Agency (SMCRA), for review and approval of a third floor of development for the East
92 Madison Square mixed use development project, pursuant to Section 20-3.5(D)(l) ofthe land development
93 code, is hereby approved with two conditions: (1) that the project be limited to three (3) stories; and (2) that
94 the site be developed in substantial compliance with the plans prepared by Fanjul & Associates, LLC and
95 attached hereto as "Exhibit A", unless amended with approval ofthe City Commission and the SMCRA by
96 written resolution.
97
98
99 Section 2: The City Commission, finding that good cause exists for extending the time of the
100 Special Use approval and hereby grants an additional six months to obtain the master building permit.
2
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
Therefore, the Special Use shall lapse after one (1) year if no master building permit which implements
the Special Use has been issued for such use.
Section 3: This resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this __ , day of ___ , 2017.
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM
LANGUAGE, LEGALITY AND
EXECUTION THEREOF:
CITY ATTORNEY
3
APPROVED:
MAYOR
Commission Vote:
Mayor Stoddard:
Vice Mayor Welsh:
Commissioner Edmond:
Commissioner Harris:
Commissioner Liebman:
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
PLANNING BOARD
Special Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, May 30,2017
CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS
07:00 P.M.
The City of South Miami Code of Ordinances, Section SA-5, requires that all lobbyists, as defined in that section,
must register with the City Clerk before engaging in any lobbying activities and in most cases pay an annual fee oj
$500.00 and an additional $100 for each additional issue. This applies to all persons who are retained with or
without compensation to influence any action, decision, recommendation of someone with the city, including the
city manager, city attorney, department heads, city personnel, or members of the city commission or members oj
any city board, concerning a matter that could foreseeably be address by the city commission or a city board. There
are some exceptions and exemptions. The following are not considered to be lobbyist: a representative of a
principal at a quasi-judicial hearing, experts who present scientific or technical information at public meetings,
representatives of a neighborhood association without compensation and representatives of a not-for-profit
community based organization for the purpose of requesting a grant who seek to influence without special
compensation.
Individuals who wish to view or listen to the meeting in its entirety, audio and video versions of the
meeting can be found on the city's website (www.southmiamifl.gov).
I. Call to Order
Action: Mr. Basu called the meeting to order at 7:06 P.M.
II. Roll Call
Board Members Present Constituting a Quorum: Mr. Basu, (Chairman), Ms. Fischer, Dr. Philips,
Ms. Kahn, Mr. Melow, and Ms. Glavey.
Board Members Absent: Dr. Palmer
City Staff Present: Ms. Jane Tompkins (Planning Director) and Mr. Marcus Lightfoot (Senior
Planner/Zoning Administrator).
City Staff Absent: None
City Attorney: Mr. Thomas Pepe
III. Administrative Matters
• None at this Time.
IV. Public Hearings
1
Mrs. Tompkins stated that the items before the Board pertain to the parcels of land formally known
as Madison Square. Because of the geographic location of each of the parcels, the project was
further divided into Madison Square East and Madison Square West. Mrs. Tompkins then
recommended that the items be grouped together between the East and West projects and
reviewed accordingly. Mr. Basu recommended that the presentation be for the entire project and
then hold separate discussions on the items for both the east project and the west project. Mr.
Basu then questioned how the vote on the items would be performed. Mr. Pepe stated that the
items would need to be voted on separately but could be discussed as a group.
The Board then read each of the items into the record.
1. PB-17-008
Applicant: City of South Miami
A Resolution pursuant to Section 20-3.5(D)(1) and other applicable provisions of the City of
South Miami Land Development Code approving an increase from two stories to four stories
for a Mixed-Use Project on the West Madison Square property as legally described herein.
Mr. Melow read the item into the record.
2. PB-17-009
Applicant: City of South Miami
A Resolution pursuant to Section 20-3.5(D)(1) and other applicable provisions of the City of
South Miami Land Development Code approving an increase from two stories to four stories
for a Mixed-Use Project on the East Madison Square property as legally described herein.
Ms. Glavey read the item into the record.
3. PB-17-010
Applicant: City of South Miami
A Resolution relating to a request for a variance from Section 20-4.4 and other applicable
provisions of the City of South Miami Land Development Code to allow a reduction in the
number of parking spaces provided for a Mixed-Use Project on the East Madison Square
property as legally described herein.
Ms. Fischer read the item into the record.
4. PB-17-011
Applicant: City of South Miami
A Resolution relating to a request for a variance from Section 20-4.4 and other applicable
provisions of the City of South Miami Land Development Code to allow a reduction in the
number of parking spaces provided for a Mixed-Use Project on the West Madison Square
property as legally described herein.
Ms. Kahn read the item into the record.
Mrs. Tompkins presented the complete Madison Square project to the Board.
2
Ms. Fischer stated that the Board is being asked to vote on an increase from two (2) stories to
four (4) stories. She then asked why is the Board being asked to vote on this type of change
when all the backup provided proposes a height of three (3) stories.
Mrs. Tompkins stated that the reason behind this is that staff wanted to provide the City
Commission with options for the height. She then pointed out that Staff is recommended that
the building be limited to three (3) stories in height.
Dr. Philips asked about the location of entry into the building. Arturo Fanjul, the architect of
record for the project explained the entrances into building #2 to the Board.
Ms. Kahn asked if the plans provided are specifically related to Family Dollar. Mr. Pepe explained
the process by which a developer could propose a project to the South Miami Community
Redevelopment Agency (SMCRA). He then stated that the project before the Board is tied to
Family Dollar. In return for a Family Dollar being placed in the project, the developer will build
the project. Ms. Kahn then responded that the vote on the items listed for review would be tied
to the LLC that owns the proposed Family Dollar that will be in the Madison Square project, but
there are options for other proposals. Mr. Pepe stated yes to the response from Ms. Kahn.
The Chairperson opened the floor to public comments on the Complete Madison Square.
• Bishop Larry Jones -Support
• Marice Chael -Support
• Levy Kelly -Support
The Chairperson closed the floor to public comments on the Complete Madison Square
Project.
The Board grouped the items in the following order:
•. Madison Square West -PB-17-008 & PB-17-011
• Madison Square East -PB-17-009 & PB-17-010
Madison Square West
Mr. Basu allowed for each of the Board members to speak on the items pertaining to Madison
Square West
• Mr. Melow
Mr. Melow stated that he was for the project.
• Ms. Glavey
Ms. Glavey reiterated the need for affordable housing was prevalent. She also stated
that the additional housing was in line with the both the City's Land Development Code
and Comprehensive Plan. She then commended the way in which the parking was
handled for the project. Last, she stated that there were some design tweaks that could
be made to the elevations that would make the project better.
3
• Ms. Fischer
Ms. Fischer stated that anyone who thinks that she was against the Madison Square
project is mistaken. She then reiterated that she is for affordable housing in the City.
She added that the City will never get consensus for four (4) story tall Madison Square
project. She stated that to limit the parking in this type of area is considered
discrimination. If parking is going to be limited, then it should be limited across the
board for all multi-family buildings. She also mentioned that she has been hearing talk
about sharing parking spaces with the churches near the Madison Square project but
nothing has materialized yet. Last Ms. Fischer stated that for the betterment of the
community that we do get a Madison Square, she will be voting No on the four (4)
stories for Madison Square.
• Ms. Kahn
Ms. Kahn stated that she understands the impetus to weigh on the side of aesthetics,
but prefers to weigh her vote on needs of the people. She stated that there is a certain
irony when the discussion on parking and discrimination is mentioned. She stated that
the community has been fighting for this project for a long time. The area is pedestrian
friendly, with the Metro Rail station nearby. She also stated that she would vote for the
project to be four (4) stories and stated that she has heard the comments from the
community regarding Family Dollar and is not in favor of the future tenant, but thinks
that it is important to move forward and set the parameters for it. After Dr. Philips
spoke, Ms. Kahn added that that the discrimination lies in the fact that the area was
populated with its own businesses before. She then stated that part of this project is to
put affordable housing while the other part is to put the Family Dollar as an anchor to
stimulate business in the area. She closed with stating that she would like to see a
rebirth of self-sustaining businesses in the community.
• Dr. Philips
Dr. Philips recalled a different iteration of the project that would have been tall against
the adjacent single family residences. She then gave an example of how the height could
be managed so that the portions of the project had four (4) stories that was set back
further away from residential with the remaining portions being set at three (3) story
with the portions closer to the residences being set at two (2) stories. She also stated
that because the project is near public transportation, it is very generous to think that
each of the families living in the proposed residences will have two (2) vehicles. People
should be asked if they would like to give up one (1) of the parking spaces so that it
could be used for the commercial uses. She then stated that she was for the project.
• Mr. Basu
Mr. Basu stated that Madison Square has been the topic of discussion for a long time
and the best news is that the City has someone that is willing to finance the project. He
then stated that he has several issues with the project which are as follows:
4
1. Affordable Housing -How does the city safeguard the affordable housing so that it is
available for South Miami residents. Mr. Pepe explained that the development
agreement speaks to the requirements for obtaining housing in the project. Mr.
Basu then asked if there will be a combination of market rate and affordable
housing within the project, of which Mr. Pepe stated no. It will all be affordable
housing.
2. Parking -When it comes to parking, some of the residents will not have two (2)
vehicles. The project is within walking distance to public transportation. He also
feels that this is an opportunity where the community will come together and figure
out how to resolve the parking issue.
3. SW 64 th Street -the street has a wide ROW with different uses that allows for
multimodal transportation. Because of that, there should be a comprehensive look
at the corridor.
4. Transitional Zoning -The design is sensitive to the transitional zoning from
commercial to residential. He then asked if the third (3) floor could be set back
further to aid in this transition. If not along SW 64th Street, at least along the SW 60 th
Avenue side.
Motion: Dr. Philips moved to approve PB-17-008 as presented with Staffs recommendations.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Melow.
Ms. Fischer stated that there are more opportunities for affordable housing. To put all the
density into one (1) project is not the right thing to do. Affordable housing should be scattered
throughout the city as opposed to one specific location. She closed by stating that when a large
amount of pressure is applied to a specific project, it will never work out.
Ms. Glavey encouraged everyone to google parking best practices. She then stated that this
would be first time that it was implemented in the City which is an innovative thing to do. She
also recommended that there be car share for the project.
Vote: Yes 5, No 1 (Fischer)
Mr. Melow: Yes
Ms. Glavey: Yes
Mr. Basu: Yes
Ms. Fischer: No
Ms. Kahn: Yes
Dr. Philips: Yes
Motion: Ms. Glavey moved to approve PB-17-011 as presented with Staff's recommendations.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Melow.
Vote: Yes 5, No 1 (Fischer)
Dr. Philips: Yes
Ms. Kahn: Yes
Ms. Fischer: No
Mr. Basu: Yes
Ms. Glavey: Yes
Mr. Melow: Yes
5
Motion: Ms. Glavey moved to approve PB-17-009 as presented with Staff's recommendations.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Melow.
Vote: Yes 5, No 1 (Fischer)
Mr. Melow: Yes
Ms. Glavey: Yes
Mr. Basu: Yes
Ms. Fischer: No
Ms. Kahn: Yes
Dr. Philips: Yes
Motion: Dr. Philips moved to approve PB-17-010 as presented with Staff's recommendations.
The motion was seconded by Ms. Kahn.
Vote: Yes 5, No 1 (Fischer)
Dr. Philips: Yes
Ms. Kahn: Yes
Ms. Fischer: No
Mr. Basu: Yes
Ms. Glavey: Yes
Mr. Melow: Yes
A Resolution relatin 0 a r .n2A/~ e pplicable
5. PB-17-012 rlN
Applicant: City of South Miami HI
. . . of i i n I _ Increase in the I~ii o.v~1! e on the East Madison Square property 1IIes!llYilliil~'n:1IIrltlJ'
A Resolution relatin a r ftzA.l e pplicable
6. PB-17-013 rlN
Applicant: City of South Miami HI
. . . of i i n I _I an increase in the I~I ~.l:t e c on the West Madison Square property ;f;liiiim,n
V. Public Comments/New Business
The Chairperson opened the floor to public comments and any new business.
Public Comments Section
• Commissioner Walter Harris stated that the Commission had already decided that the building
would be set at three (3) stories and that he was working with the City Attorney to craft
6
language to that effect. Ms. Fischer stated that the Board approved a height of four (4) stories
with a recommendation for three (3) stories.
• Bishop Jones, Marice Chael, and Levy Kelly each approached the podium and thanked the Board
for their vote on the items before them.
New Business Section
• Ms. Fischer stated that eleven (11) out of ninety-one (91) units in the Metro South building
across from City Hall have been allocated to South Miami residents. After looking into why this
was the case, she found out that the building only had a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy.
Because of that the company managing the building doesn't have to disclose any information
until the Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. She then stated that she still wants to know
how any units will be allocated to South Miami and that she would like to see that a majority of
those units allocated for South Miami residents.
The Chairperson closed the floor to public comments and any new business.
VI. Approval of the Minutes
1. Special Planning Board Meeting Minutes of March 22, 2017:
The Board unanimously approved the meeting minutes with changes. There was no motion
held for the action.
2. Regular Planning Board Meeting Minutes of March 14,2017
The Board unanimously approved the meeting minutes with changes. There was no motion
held for the action.
VII. Future Meeting Date:
A) Regular Meeting -June 13, 2017 at 7:00 P.M.
VIII. Adjournment
Motion: Dr. Philips moved to approve PB-17-010 as presented with Staff's recommendations. The
motion was seconded by Ms. Kahn.
Mr. Basu adjourned the meeting at 8:22 P.M.
7
May 18, 2017
City of South Miami
Attn: Jane Tompkins, AICP
6130 Sunset Drive
South Miami, FL 33143
Sout~iami
THE CITY OF PLEASANT LIVING
SUBJECT: Madison Square West: 5978 SW 64 th Street (folio 09-4025-010-0010), 6415 SW 60th
Avenue (folio 09-4025-010-0030t 6429 SW 60th Avenue (folio 09-4025-010-0040),
6442 SW 59 th Place (folio 09-4025-010-0180), 6420 SW 59 th Place (folio 09-4025-
010-0160), and vacant lots with the following folio numbers: 09-4025-010-0050, 09-
4025-010-0020,09-4025-010-0140, and 09-4025-010-0170
Dear Mrs. Tompkins,
This is to certify that the attached ownership list, map and mailing labels are a complete and
accurate representation of the real estate property and property owners within 500 feet radius
of the external boundaries of the subject properties listed above, including the subject property.
This reflects the most current records on the file in Miami-Dade County Property Appraisers'
Office.
Sincerely,
NKENGAA. PAYNE
City of South Miami I 6130 Sunset Drive I South Miami, FL 33143-5093
305.663.6338 I southmiamifl,gov
,[+I~I'1
I ~.vrsu.wn: .
'!
~ ;c
"" f-
'!Ii
:t
H .~
.ID , . .. ~. '
-·l·," jl . _::~-==sW $'(TH::P L-::-:::-:::-:-::i;:~:-:57t:~::PX; !
ii'ii-·-"-:-'-'-_c:;:;
sVr.'6·2:!'i:O'::CT-:: J.
_~l,
''(':'
Q
o!' fo'i!
10.
I
~
.. )/1.
__ '0':'-------.------:-----~-o-----.. :----.--:---.-. ~ ;-
~.J.
NOTICE O}""' PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
Planning and Zoning Department
6130 Sllliset Drive; South Miami, Florida 33143
Phone: (305) 663-6326; Fax #: (305) 668-7335
On Tuesday, May 30, 2017 at 7:00 P.M., the City of South Miami's Planning Board will conduct
public hearings in the City Commission Chambers at the above address on the following items:
1. PB-17-008
Applicant: City of Soutb Miami
A Resolution pursuant to Section 20-3.5(D)(1) and other applicable provisions of the City of South
Miami Land Development Code approving an increase from two stoties to four stories for a Mixed-
Usc Project on the West Madison Square property as legally described herein."
2. PB-17-009
Applicant: City of South Miami
A Resolution pursuant to Section 20-3.5(D)(1) and other applicable provisions of the City of South
Miami Land Development Code approving an increase from two stories to four stories for a Mixed-
Use Project on the East Madison Square property as legally described herein.
3. PB-17-010
Applicant: City of South Miami
A Resolution relating to a request for a variance from Section 20-4.4 and other applicable
provisions of the City of South Miami Land Development Code to allow a reduction in the number
of parking spaces provided for a Mixed-Use Project on the East Madison Square property as legally
described herein. "
4. PB-17-011
Applicant: City of South Miami
A Resolution relating to a request for a variance from Section 20-4.4 and other applicable
provisions of the City of South Miami Land Development Code to allow a reduction in the number
of parking spaces provided for a Mixed-Use Project on the West Madison Square property as
legally described herein.
5. PB-17-012
Applicant: City of South Miami
A Resolution relating to a request for a variance from Section 20-3.5(G) and other applicable
provisions of the City of South Miami Land Development Code to allow an increase in tbe
maximum impervious coverage for a Mixed-Use Project on the East Madison Square property as
legally described berein.
6. PB-J7-013
Applicant: City of South Miami
A Resolution relating to a request for a variance from Section 20-3.S(G) and other applicable
provisions of the City of South Miami Land Development Code to allow an increase in the
maximum impervious coverage for a Mixed-Use Project on the West Madison Square property as
legally described herein.
All interested parties are urged to attend. Objections or expressions of approval may be made in person at the hearing or filed in writing
prior to or at the hearing. The Planning Board reserves the right to recommend to the City Commission whatever the board considers in
the best interest for the area involved. lnterested parties requesting information are asked to contact the Planning and Zoning
Department by calling 305-663·6326 or writing to the address indicated above. .
You are hereby advised that jf any person desires to appeal any decision made with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or
hearing, such person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the
proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based (F.S. 2860105). Refer to
hearing number when making any inquiry
SW64TH ST
6412
6428
6442
6456
6420
6487
6505
6501
6520
MIAMI DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW
Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and
Legal Holidays
Miami, Miami·Dade County, Florida
STA TE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF MIAMI.DADE;
Before the undersigned authorily personally appeared
MARIA MESA, who on oath says that he or she is the LEGAL
CLERK, Legal Notices of the Miami Daily Business Review
f/kta Miami Review, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday and
Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami in Miami -Dade
County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement,
being a Legal Advertisement of Notice in the matter of
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CllY OF SOUTH MIAMI-PB-17-008 -APPLICANT: CITY OF
SOUTH MIAMI-MAY 30,2017 -ETC
in the XXXX Court,
was published ,n said newspaper in the issues of
05/19/2017
Affiant further says that the said Miami Daily Business
Review is a newspaper published at Miami, in said
Miami-Dade County, Florida and that the said neWspaper has
heretofore been continuously published in. said Miami -Dade
County, Florida each day (except Saturday, Sunday and
Legal Holidays) and has been entered as second . ctass mail
matter at the post office in Miami in said Miami-Dade County,
Florida. for a period of one year next preceding the first
publicalion of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant
further says that he or she has neither paid nor promised any
person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission
or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for
fore me this
~'~
(SEAL)
MARIA MESA personally known to me
·.{lli.~
'~~~:t:'-=~"'~\~
. DtWeloj)meiit-Codifto allows ,.diiQtionln tiJe I)ljmber of par:king
~~f;da:~u:rz~on the ~stf,tadI8on~u;ue
4~::J!!a~~GttyOfSOtrth'M~mi -. '.' ................ -.. '" '.'
. A ResOlutiOn rlilatilg toa request for aVilriance from SI!c;tion,2Q.4;4
andothe; appllC8blepi'ov!8ions of the City of SOuth Miami Land
Oev8lOpment Code to. allo\'l a_~Uon .In the. nLllil:ber of parking
SpaCM provided fora M1xed-llQ. Project on tile West .Madison Square
property as legally dasoribed herein. . . ..
5. PB-17-1>12 .
Applcant: City of South MIaini·
A Resolution reIatIniI to a request for a vanllnce from .Sectkin 2O-3.5{G)
and other~ prolllslonsof the City of South MIami land
Developi1li!lifCOdeto aUowa,. ~&elnthe IiiaXimimi ImPen10us coVerage for II Mixed-Use ProJec!on the East Madison Square
.. property _1epIIy dNCribed herein. .
6.P8-17-1>.13 ... ... . .. ... ..
App!ki.ilnt:City of South Miami .. .. . ....
A Resplution. relating to a r8quest fO!'. a val'!arlce from SectIon 2O-3.5{G)
and· other applicable proVIsions of tile City Of SoUth MIami Land
Qtvelopmeni c.to alow an increase In themaxhnum Iinpervious
coverage for a Mlxed-,Use Project on the West Madson Square
property as legally dtsCrtlMid herein. .
All interestedparHes Me urged ~ attand.ObiectiOOs or ~s Of approval
may be made in person at the h8ar1ng or filed in writing prior to or at the
hearing. The Planning Board reserves the riglt to rilcommend to the CitY
Commission whatever the l:loaro.consld8!S .Inthe best interest for the area
involved. Interested partieS r8C1Uesting Information are asked to contact the
PlannillQ and Zoning Department by. calling 305-663-6326 or wrltlngto the
address indicated above. . ..
You are Ilereby advised that if any person desires to appeal iJrIy decision
maOe with respect to any matter' cOnsidered. at this rile&ting. Or hearing,
such perSon will need iI record ()! the proceed1ngS, and for such purpose
may need to ensure that a v~m record of the proceedings is made,
whiCh record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to
be based (F.S. 286.0105). Refer to hearing number when making any i1qWly.
5119 17 -99/0000226117M
22SE I I NEIGHBORS I SUNDAY MAY 28 2017
MIAMIHERAlD.COM
CITY o.F SOUTH MIAMI
COURTESY NOTICE
NOTICE IS I-IEREHY giwn Ihallk Cily Cl}]llmi"i"ll or Ihe Cily "r SOUlh :-'·lia1l1i. Fhlrida will C(lndul'l Put>1ic l-karinghi al ii, r"1,ular City C'}]11llli"i"n Illeeling
,"heduled fpr Tu(',day, June 6. :C1l17, beginning ~It 7:011 p.lll .. in the City C"lllIni"ipn Chamber" AI311 SlllN't Driw, tp consiLiel Illl' fl,llu"ing item(,).
A R(,l.,olutioJ1 dllthori/ing the City Nli.Ulagl'"l" tel negotiate and II} ~ntL'r into Cl mLlllj-ye~lr conrract with SDuth ~\'Ii(lmj Youth Bal.,ehaJJ League. Jnl'. ("SJ'"lYBL") jPl
lhe management of youth ba,dxdl \nvicc\ <:II Palmer Park.
A Rt'''.;nluti(lIl '-tnthnril.ing the City Nlanager t(l enter into multi-year agreement, \\'jIh A"hhritt. 11K., and Bcrg~ron Emelgl~ncy S('n'in~\, ]Ik., j"llr Dis(!'ilL'r Ddnis
Removal i.tnd Di",plbal Sl:fvicl'l.; through ~I piggyback from a City of North ivljami Beach l"Pl1tnh,:t.
i\ ]("'Ollilillll or Ihe M<ly"r <lnel City ('lllllllli"ion \,1 Ihl' Cil\ or S"lIlh :-'·liami. Florida, allihori/ine thl' ('il\ :-'-bnaecr 10 execlIte <I lllulti-year lntn-Iocal
Agrepnwnl wilh lI·jiami-iJa,k CPU my, ,mLi Ihe Miami-Dade P,;licl' Departlllcnl, i",. Sch",,1 C1"I'"ing (3uanl Sn~ice,. '
A Re",luti(ln appnn ing " Unity ,d' Title f(lr the Properti," L(lcated at ~Y7~ SW Ar Str"et if(lli,' Ill)-402:i-OIIl-110 J II). (,4 I:; SW (i()'" A""nul' I filliu tlt)-40:"-
tl I (I-()ll.iO I, 1142Y SW W", A I'l'lllh' l.iL'lip 114-41J25-(I I (1-1)(14(11. 6442 S\\-" 59" PI<lCl' U(lli" i ItJ-.J1I2.'i-lllll-11 I )-,01, h-l211 S W 5')-' Phllc' (I"lill iJ9--I112:;-0 ]i)-I! I hll). "nei
vacant iLlt' with the toll(>wing j(>Jj" Jltullber,: ()l)--lil25-11 I 1I-()(I:'iO, lI'i-402:i-O 111-1111211, 1I\I--I1I2~-1l1 (J-(J 140, and ()')--I112:\-Ol1J-II I 70.
A Re'(llutilln uppwving <I Lnily IIf Title for the Pmpl'rtie, Located "t 5Y-I.J SW 6-1" Strl't'l ill>l;o 0\!--I1l25-01 (J-1I27(Jj, (,4111 SW :iLJ Place i ,""li(l O\l-.J1)25-1l I 0-
1):,,1)1, A4! I SW 'i') PLIl"l' i r"li" ()<)-4112'>-0 I 1)-1)2401. 64 I.' SW 'i<!'" PIal!' I foli,' ()lJ-41(1<;-O HI-InO{J I, a \ aCilil1 1,'1 with a f,'lio Illllnkr "I 119-4112.'-0 jll-(1< jll, allli
64-13 SW 59 Place Ij"lip ()lJ--I025-IIW-fn20i.
A Rcs(llllliiln pursuant tt' Sedi,ln 211-.l.:;(D HI) and Ptiler applicahle pr(l\'i,ioll' of tlw Cily oj S(luth Mi'elmi Land Del"elop]])enl Code "pprr'Ying an inuTChe from
!W() .... 1~)rie\ In rtlur :-;Iorie" lur i.1 I'djxcd-l.~ .... t' Proj('c\ (Hl I Ill' V\\?"t ~VLldi""(lJl Square properly (1\ legal I) (le\crihL'd hL'lTin
A Resululiol1 rur,udllt tl' Sectinn 211-3.:i(IJ" I 1 and other applicable pnrl"isi,\ll' uf the City oj South :v1iami Lwd Dcyclopmelll C"de appll,\in~ an inerc,",' rr"m
two q(lrie, t" f"Ul slilri", felr a Mixed-C,e Pflijellllll the Ea,llvladi,oll Syuarc prllperty '" legally de'LTihed Iierein.
A Re"ll]ulJoJl relating t(\ i.l \\?qUl'''f flH' i.l \,i.lrii.ll1LT from Sc-L'lioTl 20-4.4 and ~)llll'r applil'dhk provj,jnT)'" or Ihl' Cily Pi" South .\-linm! Land lJ\.~vL·h)J1llh~nl Cndc \0
a11o\\ a r~duction in the number {lfparking "pace ... pro\'idc-d fllr (\ :vljxt'd-ll",~ Pr()jt'd nn the Ea\\ :"\:ladi\un Square property ell., leg.ally de ... crjh~d lll'fcin.
A R('\oluliPJ) r.:lating lP a r~qul .. :--t for a \'arianc(' fl"lll)) SC'L'liPI1 2()-4..+ and {lther appliulhk pnl\"jsioJ)\ pj" thi:' City pj South ~vJiamj Land DL\'dppment (,pdt' 1(1
all"" a rcduclilll1 in Ihe numi1n (1r palling space, pnll'idcd for" :-"li\ed-U,c Proj"cI "n Ihe We'l '-'ladi",,] Squ"r,~ JlrtllvrI)' ," lepJil) d,,'criilcci her,,;n.
/A Re'lliution rehiling \0" r<,que\! tor a "ari,lllL,' fnnn Sl'criun 211-3.:'11.0.1 and "ther applicabk I1rOy;,i(1lh "r tl1<' CilY of "'''Lith !vliami Lanci J)c'wl"Jlll)cnl (,,,de)
\to a]J(\w an incrca"e ill tJw maximum impcrviou\ t:(lVcragc f(n d ~djxed-t:<';l' Prpjcl't on the Eaq ~dadison SqUi:U'C property (ll., legally de ... crihcd herrin, /
A Re~()lution rdating W a rCLjuL''''' for ~I \'i.lri~lllLT from Scclillil 2()-3,)~G) and (lther appJicat-.Jc pr(lVi~j()th or lh~~ City or S()Ulh ivliarni L,HHi D\~\ \~h)Pllh~1l1 Clldc
to all(lW ill) increa"e in the maximum impervioll"i c(l\'crage f(lr ,J lvlixed-l;<.;\~ Prpjed on tlK \Ve..;r J'v]adj,nn Squarc pro]1l'ny a ... kg!:!11y Lkscrilwd hert'in,
/'\ RCl...ulutipn authoril.illg the City l\1anag:cr til enter inlo a mtllti-YCi:U" agreement with Limpll~inc\ of S(luth Florid~l, Inc" fpr i.l puhli( tnH1:'j1I)fLltioll eifl.'ularllr
\l'f\'ice, hy piggybacking nnw it~ cuntratl \\ ilh Ihe Cily ur AVen{llf~L
All Ordinance amending tlw Land D<'wlopnwnl C,,,k. Article l1, Secti"n 20-1 . .1. 'Dctinitiom" and Artick HI. Sectil>n 20-3.6 "Supplemental Regnlali"n<'
adding ~llhsn'(ion (\\.') "Soldr RcquircJl)l"nls" ,mel pn1\'jdillg ddinitipn" rdating t() and (ri(('ria and regulations jpr solar c{lllecl{)r~ in thl.~ City Pi" 50mh rdiami,
An Ordinance alTll'nLiing Ilrc Cil) "r S(lLith Miami Land Dl'\"el"pITlCllI C,,(lt', Aflick IV. Sect;lIn 20-4.7 ! B I lfi clarir) lil(' intent (>r Ihi, Sl'cti,'n lu include
C0Jl1111t'l"l:ial prppntie, ,md hy adJing qJh,ecti~lJ1 ! K) tn rn(l\'ide j(lr "crt~('njn~ of the interilll pI \,ilcanlcomml.'reial JlfPpert),
An Ordin~tn(e rdating}{l the Cjty'~ 2017 j],c~d yi.~i.U' hudge!". alilhoriring ltD inlTl'aV~ (If appr(lprialion:-. fpr expt'nditllre line j{t'm 125-J7~(l-~-l1-,~4:)O Pl'opk's
Tran'p"rt<lliLlIl TClx Pund D;,,'ct Trans;1 C(lnlr"Clu~,] Sen'ill" <lClilUlll in Ihl' ;l111(\lInl (>1 QO,.'iOO.
ALL interp,led parti," are in\iku 1(1 attend and ,\"il1 he Iward.
P(lr further inf,'nn<ltit'n, pk<l'" cuntacl thl' ClI) Clerk", Ollicl' at: .'()."i-hh~-n'-I().
PUJ'1],tnlI0 j:]llrl(1.1 ~!'\111(~'" ~:-;6,;~1[}5 Ih,~ ('1!\ h['~cl.l} ,HI\'i'';~\' [ll(' pul.J:t Ih,~ J: ,\)),:r'l,n Ik"H1L" III ;q~i'c'.d ,\J)Y ib'I-:\lll lll,t(k
<it ll" l;lL'cllJl~ III hCil)IIl,~, h,; ,lr ,ill' \\II! rll'~d" 1,~l"PJd pj Lll,' [,](h.,;C,!lI1.c-', rInd Jhdl ,'11]" 'dIll! P,lIjl"'l', <dl[:, lnl pCf\llj, J!l:I~
!1l:ludc" Ill..:. i'.:"!1::>'(ln~' ,lnL! C\ hk',;J,,' np(\fI \\ hld1 Ill;.' 'lp~,,',ti l' 10 he h,'I"cd
Maria ,\1. :vlcnL'IlLiu, C\'lC
City Cler),
Ib1' B("trd ,\~l'lh:--or C(1;;~rl1l""1llr \\,:Ih lC")ll'L I ttl ,l:l~ 1ll.IJIl" (1lIblil:L'd
1: ,,:II'IIlt.: [hill ,I \~'rb;.Hl:l; :~'l'\IJ\l \)[ lh .. P[\ll"l'~'llJn~" I' JIlJd .. \\lll~h ]IT()H!
MIAMI DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW
Pllbll<;I,pdD'lIiYC'Y.CC'1'1 S'lhlfd<'l'Y. Sund:lY "no
LC'gall-iolldays
!"'~lfl1l MI8ml'[)Jdl>Co\lnly Fior«:il
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF MIAMI·DADE:
Before the under~lgned authority personalfy <lppeared
MARIA MESA, who 011 oath says that he or she IS the LEGAL
CLERK Legal Notices of the Miami Daily Busmess Review
Ilk/a ~,,1Iaml Review, a dally (except Saturday Sunday and
Legal Hol·days) newSr'8per published at Miami In Mlaml-OClde
County, Flor,da, Ih,'l\ the attached COpy of advertisement
berng a Legal Advertlseme,,! of Notice In the matter of
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI JUNE 6, 2017
Ir. the XXXX Court.
was pllblrshed 'n said newspaper In the Issues of
05/1~'/2017
Affiant further says that the said Miami Dally BUSiness
Revle'N IS a newspaper publlsheo at Miami. In said
Ml8ml·Dade County. Florida and tnat the said newspaper has
heretofore been contl'luously published in said IVilaml.Dade
COlmly f'lorlda eac:h day (except Saturday, Sunday and
Leg;:!1 HO!ld8YS) anr.i has been entered as second class mall
matlel at the pO$1 offiCe 111 Miami In said M'aml"Dade County,
Floflrl<'l for a period of one year next preceding the first
puI1,IIr:'atlon 01 the a!tached copy of Rdvertlsement and affiant
further S8yS Ira! he or she has neither paid nor promised any
p'S'rson firm or corporation ant' discount rebate, commiSSion
or refcJnd for ths-eurpuse-..of
(SEAL)
MARIA. MESA personally kl10wn to me
~"",\\\II~~'IIII/IIIIII ~~~ ••• ~if~ ~ :::~\ONI::';_. ~ ~ "~~ER4-';:' ? 2: :;>..,:}" .;>~" ~ i<~" GG1Yl671l '}*i
-::;.-:t.:. • S:~ ~ ~ ··.);o:Ondod ~~ ~(!"./ ~ § %.~r~.f.lJ~~!~\~!~"'~~
/1111,llLIC. S1~~ ~"'~
11/1/111111\1\\\\
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY given that the City Commission of the City of South
Miami, Florida will conduct Public Hearing(s) at Its regular City Commission
meeting scheduled for Tuesday, June 6, 2017. beginning at 7'00 p.m., in the City
Commission Chambers, 6130 Sunset Drive, to consider the following item{s)'
A ResolutIOn authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and to enter into
a multi-year contract with South Miami Youth Baseball League, Inc.
("SMYBL") for the management of youth baseball services at Palmer Park.
A Resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into multi-year
agreements With Ashbntt, Inc., and Bergeron Emergency Services, Inc.,
for Disaster Debris Removal and Disposal Services through a piggyback
from a City of North Miami Beach contract.
A Resolution of the Mayor and City CommissIon of the City of South
Miami, Florida, authorizing the City Manager to execute a multi-year Inter-local
Agreement With Miami-Dade County, and the Miami-Dade Police Department,
for School Crossing Guard Services.
A Resolution approving a Unity of Title for the Properties Located at
5978 SW 64th Street (lolro 09-4025-010-0010), 6415 SW 60th Avenue
(folio 09-4025-010-0030) ,6429 SW 60th Avenue (fo\io 09-4025-010-0040),
6442 SW 59th Place (fOlio 09~4025-01 0-0180), 6420 SW 59th Place (fOliO
09-4025-010-0160), and vacant lots With the following folio numbers'
09-1\025-010-0050, 09-4025-010-0020, 09-4025-010-0140, and 09-4025-
010-0170.
A Resolution approving a Unity of Trlle for the Properties Located at
5944 SW 64th Street (folio 09-4025-010-0270), 6401 SW 59 Place (folio
09.4025-010-0280), 6411 SW 59 Place (foliO 09-4025-010-0290). 6415
SW 59th Place (folio 09-4025-010-0300). a vacant lot with a foliO number
of 09-4025-010-0310, and 6443 SW 59 Place (foliO 09-4025-010-0320).
A Resolution pursuant to Section 20-3.5(0)(1) and other applicable
provisions of the City of South Miami Land Development Code approving
an increase from two stories to four stones for a Mixed-Use Project on
the West Madison Square property as legally described herein.
(
A Resolution pursuant to Section 20-3.5{O){1) and other apP liC3blv provisions of the City of South Miami Land Development Code approving
an increase from two stories to four stories for a Mixed-Use Projeci on the
East Madison Square property as legally described herern
A Resolution relating to a request for a vanance from Section 20-4,4 and
other applicable provisions of the City of South Miami Land Development
Code to allow a reduction in the number of parking spaces provided for
a Mixed-Use Project on the East Madison Square property as legally
described herein.
A Resolution relating to a request for a varrance from Section 20-4.4 and
other applicable prOVisions of the City of South Miami Land Development
Code to allow a reduction in the number of parking spaces provided for
a Mixed-Use Project on the West Madison Square property as legally
described herein.
A Resolution relating to a request for a variance from Sec\1on 20-3.5(G) and
other app1rcable provisions of the City of South Miami Land Development
Code to allow an Increase in the maximum Impervious coverage for a
Mixed-Use Project on the East Madison Square property as legally
described herein.
A Resolution relating to a request for a variance from Section 20-3.5(G) and
other applicable provisions of the City of South Miami Land Development
Code to allow an Increase In the maximum impervious coverage for a
Mixed-Use Project on the West Madison Square property as legally
descnbed herein.
An Ordinance amending the Land Development Code, Article II. Section
20-2.3, "Definitions" and Article III, Section 20-36 "Supplemental Regulations"
adding subsection 0Nl "Solar Requirements" and providing definitions
relating to and criteria and regulations for solar collectors in the City of
South Miami.
An Ordinance amending the City of South Miami Land Development
Code, Article IV. Section 20-4.7 (8) to clarify the intent of thiS Section to
include commercial properties and by adding subsection (K) to provide
for screemng of the interror of vacant commercial property.
ALL interested parties are inVited to attend and will be heard
For further information. please contact the City Clerk's Office at:
305-663-6340
Maria M. Menendez, CMC
City Clerk
Pursuant to Florida Statutes 286.0105, the City hereby adVises the publiC
that If a person decides to appeal any deCISion made by this Board,·Agency
or Commission with respect to any matter considered at its meeting or
heanng, he or she will need a record of the proceedings, and that for such
purpose, affected person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the
proceedings IS made which record includes the testimony and eVidence
upon which the appeal IS to be based,
5/19 17 -1 06/0000226232M