Loading...
Res No 124-17-14925RESOLUTION NO.124-17-14925 AResolutionapprovingaUnity of TitleforthePropertiesLocatedat5978 SW 64th Street (folio 09-4025-010-0010),6415 SW 60th Avenue (folio 09-4025-010-0030),6429 SW 60th Avenue(folio 09-4025-010-0040),6442 SW 59th Place(folio 09-4025-010-0180),6420 SW 59th Place(folio 09-4025-010-0160),and vacant lots with the followingfolio numbers:09-4025- 010-0050,09-4025-010-0020,09-4025-010-0140,and 09-4025-010-0170. WHEREAS,theSouthMiamiCommunityRedevelopmentAgency ("SMCRA")owns several parcels onthesouthsideofSW64*Street between SW60*Avenue andSW59*Place,as follows:5978 SW64*Street(folio 09-4025-010-0010),6415 SW60*Avenue (folio 09-4025-010-0030),6429SW60* Avenue (folio 09-4025-010-0040),6442 SW 59*Place (folio 09-4025-010-0180),6420SW 59*Place (folio09-4025-010-0160),andvacantlotswiththefollowingfolionumbers:09-4025-010-0050,09- 4025-010-0020,09-4025-010-0140,and 09-4025-010-0170 (collectively referredtoas "West Madison Square");and WHEREAS,developmentplansfora mixed-use projectthatencompassesallnine(9)parcelshave beensubmittedforapproval;and WHEREAS,Paragraph (A)of Section 20-5.15 Unity oftitle submittal andprocedures oftheLand Development Code(LDC)provides thata unity oftitleshallbe required inthe following cases: *** 2.Wheneverthebuildingsite consists ofmorethanonelotor parcel andthemainbuildingis located ononeormoreofthelotsor parcels and the remaining lotsor parcels encompassing the building sitearerequiredtomeettheminimumzoning requirements. NOW,THEREFORE,BEIT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,FLORIDA THAT: Section 1:The Unity of Title for the properties located at 5978 SW 64*Street (folio 09-4025-010- 0010),6415 SW 60*Avenue (folio 09-4025-010-0030),6429 SW 60*Avenue (folio 09-4025-010-0040), 6442 SW 59*Place (folio 09-4025-010-0180),6420 SW 59*Place (folio 09-4025-010-0160),and vacant lots with the following folio numbers:09-4025-010-0050,09-4025-010-0020,09-4025-010-0140,and 09- 4025-010-0170is hereby approved. Section2:Thisresolutionshallbe effective immediately uponadoptionhereof. PASSEDANDADOPTEDthis 6 th,dayof June ,2017. ATTEST:APPROVED: JUu I MAYOR Commission Vote:5-0 Res.No.124-17-14925 READAND A^RQiflBD AS T/ LANGU Aa^LpGAJLITY. EXEClW^THERrioF:t MayorStoddard:Yea Vice Mayor Welsh:Yea Commissioner Edmond:Yea Commissioner Harris:Yea Commissioner Liebman:Yea I mS \CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI South MicHTli office of the city manager THE CITY OF PLEASANT LIVING INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM A? To:The Honorable Mayor &Members of the CityCommission Via:Steven Alexander,City Manager From:Jane K.Tompkins,AICP,PlanningDirector Date:June 6,2017 Subject: 1.A Resolution pursuant to Section 20-3.5(D)(l)and other applicable provisions of the City of South Miami Land Development Code approving an increase from two stories to four stories for a Mixed-Use Project on the West Madison Square property as legally described herein. 2.A Resolution relating toa request fora variance from Section 20-4.4 and other applicableprovisions of theCity of South Miami Land Development Code toallowa reduction in the number of parking spaces provided fora Mixed-Use Project on the West Madison Square property as legally described herein. 3.AResolutionapprovingaUnityofTitleforthe Properties Locatedat 5978 SW 64th Street(folio 09-4025-010-0010),6415 SW 60th Avenue(folio09-4025-010-0030),6429 SW 60th Avenue (folio 09-4025-010-0040),6442SW 59th Place (folio 09-4025-010-0180),6420 SW 59th Place(folio09-4025-010-0160),and vacant lots with the followingfolio numbers: 09-4025-010-0050,09-4025-010-0020,09-4025-010-0140,and 09-4025-010-0170. Background: TheSouth Miami CommunityRedevelopment Agency (CRA)ownsapproximately1.2acresof propertyonthesouthsideof SW 64th Street generally referredtoas Madison Square.The CRA's planning documentdesignatestheareafora mixed-use redevelopmentproposalthat will create an anchor for the north endofSW 59th Placeandhelp stimulate revitalizationeffortsin the area. Forthe purposes of the development review,the property isdescribedas either EastorWest MadisonSquare,withSW 59th Placeservingasthedivider.This memo isfocusedonthezoning requests forWestMadisonSquare;the EastMadisonSquare requests are addressed ina separate memo.The West property consists of nine (9)parcels onthesouth side of SW 64th Street between SW59thPlaceandSW60thAvenueas shown in the highlighted area below: Madison Square -West Parcel SpecialUse and Variance Applications 5978 SW 64 Street June 6,2017 Page 2of9 Subject Property located 5978 SW 64 Street The properties total 32,019 squarefeet in size (net)andare identified onthe City's maps as: 5978 SW 64th Street,6415 SW 60th Place,6429 SW 60th Avenue,6443 SW 60th Avenue1,6442 SW 59th Place,and four vacant parcels that have not been assigned astreet number2.The projectdoesnotincludethe privately owned,irregularly shapedparcelat6412 SW 59th Place. All theparcelsarezoned "SR"Specialty Retail exceptfor6443 SW 60th Avenue,whichiszoned "RS-4"Single-Family.The City's Future Land Use Map (FLUM)designatesalltheparcelsas "Mixed-Use CommercialResidential (Four-Story)". 1The Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser's website does not list an address for this parcel. 2The Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser's website identifies the vacant parcel immediately south of 6412 SW 59th Place as6420SW 59"'Place. JKT Z:\Commission ltems\2017\06-06-2017\Madison Square West\Madison Square WestCM Memo O6062017.docx Madison Square -West Parcel SpecialUse and Variance Applications 5978 SW 64 Street June 6,2017 Page3of9 6487 Zoning Map Excerpt (WOO Future LandUse Map Excerpt Surrounding land uses,zoning and FLUM designations are as follows: .';';Land Use Zoning FLUM North Church Parking lot RS-4*Single-Family Residential (Two-Story)and Mixed-Use Commercial Residential (Four-Story) South Single-family and vacant RS-4 and SR Single-Family (Two-Story) East Vacant SR Mixed-Use Commercial Residential (Four-Story) West Vacant RS-4 Single-Family Residential (Two-Story) *Community Service Overlay The City ofSouthMiamiisproposingamixed-useprojectforMadisonSquare.TheWest property will consistof approximately 8,868 square feetofcommercial space on the groundfloorand twenty(20)residentialunitson the secondandthirdfloors(tenunitsperfloor).Theproposed usesare permitted in the SR district(see Land DevelopmentCode (LDC)Sec.20-3.3(D)). The residential component willbe developed as affordable units pursuant to an agreement between the CRA and the developer.Asingleretail tenant is expected tooccupy the commercial space. As currently designed,forty-one (41)parking spaces willbe available on-site.Pursuant to Section 20-4.4of the LDC,fourteen (14)on-street spaces canbe credited to the project fora total offifty- five(55)spaces. JKT Z:\Commission ltems\2017\06-06-2017\Madison Square West\Madison SquareWestCMMemo 06062017.docx Madison Square -West Parcel Special Use and Variance Applications 5978 SW 64 Street June 6,2017 Page4 of 9 A landscape buffer separates the parking lot from the single-family residence to the south.The site plan complies with the setback,FAR and impervious coverage standards of the LDC. The attached exhibit contains the plansfor both the East and West properties.Sheet AO.l illustrates the concept planfor both the Eastand the West properties;Sheets AO.l(W),A.l.l, Al.2.3 and Al.1.3 provides the site plan,floor lay-out for the second and third floors,and conceptual elevations for the West side. Requests: As proposed,the project requires the following approvals,whicharedescribedandanalyzed below: 1.ASpecialUse to allowa height of three-stories. 2.AVariance to allowa reduction in the number ofparking spaces provided. 3.A Unity of Title Analysis; 1.ASpecialUse to allow a height of three-stories. The SR zoning district allows aheightoffourstoriesor fifty (50)feet.This provision is limited, however,by Section 20-3.5(D)Properties Abutting Single-Family Zoning Districts ofthe Land Development Code which states: (1)Notwithstanding the dimensional requirements ofthe zoning use district in which a propertyislocated,ifthatpropertyisabutting (common borderorseparatedbyaright- of-way)toa single-family zoning district the maximum height of any new building or any verticaladditiontoan existing building on that propertyis limited totwostories, however,additionalheightmaybeobtainedviathespecialusepermitprocessas set forth in Section 20-5.8. As notedabove,the projectabutsa single-family zoning districton three sides(north,westand south)andisdesignedatthree (3)storiesinheight. Special Use applications arecontrolledby LDC Section 20-5.8 Special use approvals,as follows: Section 20-5.8 (B)Required Conditions (1)Priortoapprovingaspecialuse,thecity commission shallfind that suchusemeets the conditional requirements set forthinSection20-3.4and that it: (a)Will not adversely affectthe health orsafetyofpersons residing or working in the vicinity of the proposed use; JKT Z:\Commission ltems\2017\06-06-2017\Madison Square West\Madison Square WestCM Memo 06062017.docx Madison Square -West Parcel SpecialUseandVariance Applications 5978 SW 64 Street June 6,2017 Page 5 of 9 (b)Will notbe detrimental to the publicwelfareor property or improvements in the neighborhood;and (c)Complieswithall other applicable Codeprovisions. (2)AdditionalConditions.Thecitycommissionmay designate such additional conditions in connection with a special use aswill,inits opinion,assure that such use will conform to the foregoing requirements. The conditional requirements ofSection20-3.4include general requirements that apply to all applications aswellasspecial requirements that applytospecific types of special uses.There are no special requirements for allowing additional stories,so only the general requirements apply: Section 20-3.4 Special use conditions. (A)GeneralRequirements (1)All such usesshallcomplywithall requirements established in the appropriate zone use district,unless additional or more restrictive requirements are set forth below or by the City Commission. (2)All such usesshall be determined to beofa compatible and complementary nature with any existing,planned or anticipated surrounding uses. (3)Apublichearingshallbeheldby the CityCommissionto determine the overallcompatibility of the use with the surrounding neighborhood. (4)Ifaspecialuseis,in the future,determined by the Directorof the Planningand Zoning Department or the City Commission,tobeadverselyaffecting the health,safety orwelfare, including quietenjoyment,ofpersons residing or working in the vicinity of the proposeduse,or otherwise tobe detrimental to the publicwelfareor property or improvements in the surroundingneighborhood,ortobenotincompliancewithany other applicableCode provisions,thespecialuseapprovalmaybe modified,withconditionsofapproval revised or added to alleviatesuchadverse effect,orrevokedby the City Commissionuponnotificationand public hearing. Staff Response; Afterreviewof the project,the proposed buildingcomplieswithconditionsand requirements listedin both Section 20-5.8(B)and 20-3.4(A)of the LDC in that: *Increasing the heightof the buildingfromtwostoriesto three shouldnotadversely affect the healthorsafetyofpersonsresidingorworkingin the area,nor will itbedetrimental to the publicwelfareor property or improvements in the neighborhood; *Theproposedbuildingcomplieswith other applicableCodeprovisionsregardingsize and setbacks; *Whilemostbuildingsin the area aresingle-story,the nearby churches have elements or architectural features that are comparable in height to the proposed building; JKT Z:\Commission ltems\20lA06-06-2017\Madison Square West\MadisonSquareWestCMMemoO6062017.docx Madison Square -West Parcel SpecialUse and Variance Applications 5978 SW 64 Street June 6,2017 Page6 of 9 *Thesiteis designed tomaximize the separation between the building and the single- family residence to the south;and *The proposed buildingisofa compatible and complementary nature with the existing, planned or anticipated surrounding uses. Section 20-5.8(C)Expiration ofSpecialUse Approvals further provides that anapprovalshall lapse after six(6)months ifno master building permit which implements the specialusehas beenissuedforsuchuse.The City Commission mayspecifyalongerapprovalperiodforgood cause. Planning Board Action; Following a public hearingontheitemonMay30,2017,the Planning Board votedfive(5)ayes toone(1)naytorecommendapprovalofthespecialusewith staffs recommended conditions: Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Commission approvethespecialuseapplicationwith the following conditions: 1.Thatthebuildingbelimitedto three (3)storiesinheight;and 2.Thattheprojectis developed in substantial compliance with the plans preparedby Fanjul &Associates,LLC and attached to this memo. Further,Staff recommends thatthe City Commission consider a longer approval period toensure the developer hasadequatetimetoobtainthemaster building permit. 2.Variance to allowareductioninthenumberof parking spacesprovided. The proposed project consists of approximately 8,868 sfof commercial spaceand twenty (20) housing units.Based onthis design,atotalof seventy-two (72)parking spaces are required per Section 20-4.4 of the LDC: Retail Parking Spaces Required 8,868 £-£,1 Parking Space 300Sr#r Plus 30 Parking Spaces JKT Z:\Commission ltems\2017\06-06-2017\Madison Square West\Madison Square West CM Memo 06062017.dooc Madison Square -West Parcel SpecialUseandVariance Applications 5978 SW 64 Street June 6,2017 Page 7 of 9 Residential Parking Spaces Required 20 units 2 Parking Space 1 x 77^77 *40 Parking Spaces -L U flit? Plus 20 units 1 Visitor Parking Space 1 10 Units «2 Visitor Parking Spaces TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED:30 +40 +2 =72 Fifty-five (55)spaces are shownon the proposed design,fora shortage of seventeen (17)spaces. Of the fifty-five(55)spaces available,twenty-two (22)will be allocated for the residential units (i.e.,one space per unitplus two visitorspaces);the remaining thirty-three (33)spaces willbe allocated for the commercial space.TheCityand CRA are negotiating with the nearby churches to provide additional parking for the project.However,since the negotiations have not been finalized,a variance approval is necessary. Pursuant to Section 20-5.9 of the LDC,a variance for off-street parking can be reviewed and permitted by the CityCommission at apublic hearing,after a recommendation by the Planning Board.Variance decisions shall be based onan affirmative finding as to each of the following criterion: 1.The variance is necessary to relieve particular extraordinary conditions relating to a specific property; Response:The site's smallsize,dimensions,and irregular shape,combined with the three street frontages andasingle-family residence to the south make this a particularly challenging site to develop. 2.Denial of the variance would result in hardship to the owner.Hardship results if the restriction of the zoning ordinance,when applied to a particular property,becomes arbitrary,confiscatory or unduly oppressive because of conditions of the property that distinguish it from other properties under similar zoning restrictions; Response:Development of the property islimitedbyitssize,dimensions and irregular shape,code requirements that limit height and impervious coverage,and the setbacks required from the single-family residence.These factors combine to make itdifficult to comply with the parking requirements.Further,denial of the variance will impede the development of much needed affordable housing for South Miami and a commercial tenant that will offer essential goods within walking distance of many residents. JKT Z:\Commission ltems\2017\06-06-2017\Madison Square West\Madison Square WestCM Memo O6062017.docx Madison Square -West Parcel Special Use and Variance Applications 5978 SW 64 Street June 6,2017 Page8 of 9 3.The extraordinary conditions andcircumstancesdo not resultfrom the actions of the applicant; Response:The neighborhood was platted with small,narrow lots that make it difficult to assemble sites large enough to accommodate a mixed-use development that complies withall the current LDC requirements and meets the community's development objectives.Consequently,the extraordinary conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. 4.The requested variance is the minimum variance necessary to make possible the reasonable use of the land,building or structure; Response:The project is designed to accommodate the space needs ofa national retailer and the community's desire to provideasmany affordable unitsaspossible,whilestill being sensitive to the scaleof the surrounding neighborhood andlimitingimpactson the adjacent singlefamilyhomes.Whileaparking structure mightallowadditionalparking, it's unlikely that a structure wouldfitontheproperty3.Further,ifa structure was physically possible,thebuildingwouldbe disproportionate andoutofkeepingwith the character of the neighborhood.Consequently,the requested variance is the minimum necessary to make possible the reasonable use of the land. 5.Thattheapprovalofthevariancewillbeconsistentwith the general intent andpurpose of the Land DevelopmentCode,andwillnotbeinjuriousto the neighborhoodor otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Response:The purpose of the SR districtis"tomaintain the basicspecialtyretail character oftheSunset Drive commercialareabyencouragingcomparisonretailusesatthe pedestrian-orientedgrade level and office and residential usesontheupper floors ofall buildings"(Sec.20-3.1(14)).All otherpropertieswithan SR designationareinthe Hometown District Overlay and,assuch,are allowed atwenty-five percent (25%)parking reduction for mixed-use buildings.Such reductions are typical for mixed-use buildings.If that reduction were applied tothis project,only fifty-four (54)spaces would berequired andthe project wouldcomply.Consequently,approvalof the variance will be consistent withthe general intentandpurposeofthe LDC and will notbeinjurioustothe neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. 3 For additional information about the sizing requirements of parking structures,please refer to: http://www.tirnhaahs.com/parkingdatabase/what-are-some-tvpical-standards-for-parking-garage-functional-design/ JKT Z:\Commission ltems\2017\06-06-2017\Madison Square West\Madison Square West CM Memo O6062017.docx Madison Square -West Parcel SpecialUseandVariance Applications 5978 SW 64 Street June 6,2017 Page9 of 9 Section 20-5.9(A)Expiration of Variance Approvals furtherprovidesthatvariances shall lapse afterone (1)yearifno building permithasbeen applied forin accordance withtherequestand ifthe City Commission hasnotspecifieda longer approval periodforgoodcauseshown. Punning Board Action: Following apublichearingon the item onMay30,2017,the Planning Board voted five(5)ayes toone(1)nayto recommend approval of the requested variance. Recommendation; Staff recommends that the CityCommissionapprove the varianceapplication. 3.Unity of Title Section 20-5.16 of the LDC provides that a unity of title shall be required in certain specified cases, including: 2.Whenever the building site consists of more than one lotorparceland the main buildingis located on one or more of the lotsorparcelsand the remaining lotsorparcels encompassing the building site are required to meet the minimum zoning requirements. The proposed siteplan shows the mixed-use buildingon multiple lots,with the remaininglots providingparkinganda separation from the single-familydistrict to the south. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Commission approve the unity of title. Attachments: *Site plan *Resolution approving the special use *Resolution approving the variance *Resolution approving the unity of title JKT Z:\Commission ltems\2017\06-06-2017\Madison Square West\Madison Square West CM Memo O6062017.docx CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING BOARD Special Meeting Minutes Tuesday,May 30,2017 CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS 07:00 P.M. TheCity of South Miami Code of Ordinances,Section 8A~5,requires that all lobbyists,as defined in that section, must register withtheCityClerk before engaging inanylobbying activities andin most cases pay anannual fee of $500.00andanadditional$100foreachadditionalissue.This appliestoallpersonswhoareretainedwithor without compensation toinfluenceanyaction,decision,recommendation of someone withthecity,includingthe city manager,city attorney,department heads,citypersonnel,or members of thecity commission or members of anycityboard,concerninga matter that could foreseeably beaddressbythecitycommissionoracityboard.There are some exceptionsandexemptions.Thefollowingare not consideredtobelobbyist:a representative ofa principal ata quasi-judicial hearing,expertswhopresent scientific or tethWcal information at public meetings, representativesofaneighborhoodassociationwithout CtMpensation and representatives ofanot-for-profit communitybasedorganizationforthepurposeofrequestingagrantwhoseekto influence withoutspecial compensation. Individuals who wishto view orlisten to the meeting inits entirety,audioand video versions of the meeting canbe found on the city's website (www.southmiamifl.gov). I.Call to Order Action:Mr.Basu called the meetingtoorderat7:06 P.M. II.Roll Call Board Members Present Constituting a Quorum:Mr.Basu,(Chairman),Ms.Fischer,Dr.Philips, Ms;JKahri,Mr.iVIelpw^and MfcSsiavey. Board Members Absent:Dr.Palmer CityStaff Present:Ms.Jane Tompkins (Planning Director)and Mr.Marcus Lightfoot (Senior Planner/Zoniri|^ministratoir)u City Staff Absent:None City Attorney:Mr.ThomasPepe III.Administrative Matters •None at this Time. IV.Public Hearings Mrs.Tompkins stated thattheitemsbeforethe Board pertaintotheparcelsoflandformallyknown asMadisonSquare.Becauseofthegeographic location ofeachoftheparcels,theprojectwas further dividedintoMadisonSquareEastandMadisonSquareWest.Mrs.Tompkinsthen recommended that the itemsbe grouped together between the EastandWest projects and reviewedaccordingly.Mr.Basu recommended that the presentation befortheentire project and then hold separate discussions on the itemsforboth the east project and the west project.Mr. Basu then questioned how the vote on the itemswouldbe performed.Mr.Pepe stated that the items would need tobe voted on separately butcouldbe discussed asa group. The Board then read each of the items into the record. 1.PB-17-008 Applicant:City of South Miami A Resolution pursuant to Section 20-3.5(D)(l)and other applicable provisions of the City of South Miami Land Development Code approving an increase from two stories to four stories fora Mixed-Use Project on the West Madison Square property as legally described herein. Mr.Melow read the item into the record. 2.PB-17-009 Applicant:City of South Miami A Resolution pursuant to Section 20-3.5(D)(l)and other applicable provisions of the City of South MiamiLand Development Code approving an increase from two stories to four stories fora Mixed-Use Project on the East Madison Square property aslegally described herein. Ms.Glaveyread the item into the record* 3.PB-17-010 Applicant:Cityof South M iami A Resolution relating to a request foravariancefrom Section 20-4.4 and other applicable provisions of the City of SouthMiamiLand Development Codetoallowareductionin the number of parking spaces providedforaMixed-UseProjecton the EastMadisonSquare property as legally described herein. Ms.Fischer read the item into the record. 4.PB-17-011 Applicant:Cityof South Miami A Resolution relating to a request fora variance from Section 20-4.4 and other applicable provisions of the City of South MiamiLand Development Code to allow a reduction in the number of parking spaces provided fora Mixed-Use Project on the West Madison Square property as legally described herein. Ms.Kahn read the item into the record. Mrs.Tompkins presented the complete Madison Square project to the Board. Ms.Fischer stated that the Boardis being asked to vote onan increase from two (2)stories to four(4)stories.She then asked whyis the Boardbeing asked to vote onthistype of change when all the backup provided proposes a height of three (3)stories. Mrs.Tompkins stated that the reason behind thisis that staff wanted to provide the City Commission with options for the height.She then pointed out that Staff is recommended that the building be limited to three (3)stories in height. Dr.Philips asked about the location of entry into the building.ArturoFanjul,the architect of record for the project explained the entrances intobuilding#2to the Board. Ms.Kahn askedif the plansprovidedarespecifically related to Family Dollar.Mr.Pepe explained the process bywhicha developer could propose a project to the South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency (SMCRA).He then stated that the project before the Boardistiedto Family Dollar.In returnfora Family Dollarbeingplacedin the project,the developerwillbuild the project.Ms.Kahn then responded that the vote on the items listedforreviewwouldbe tied tothe LLC that ownstheproposed Family Dollar that will beintheMadisonSquareproject,but there are options for other proposals.Mr.Pepe stated yesto the response fromMs.Kahn. The Chairperson opened the floor to public commentson the CompleteMadisonSquare. •BishopLarry Jones-Support .•MariceChael-Support •Levy Kelly-Support The Chairperson closedthe floor to public commentsontheComplete Madison Square Project. TheBoardgrouped the itemsinthe following order: •Madison Square West -PB-17-008 &PB-17-011 •Madison Square East-PB-17-009 &PB-17-010 Madison Square West Mr.Basu allowedforeachofthe Board memberstospeakontheitems pertaining to Madison Square West •Mr.Melow Mr.Melow stated that hewasfor the project. •Ms.Glavev Ms.Glavey reiterated the needforaffordablehousingwas prevalent.Shealso stated that theadditionalhousingwasinlinewiththeboththe City's Land DevelopmentCode andComprehensivePlan.Shethencommendedthewayinwhichtheparkingwas handledfortheproject.Last,she stated that there weresomedesigntweaks that could bemadetotheelevations that wouldmaketheproject better. • Ms.Fischer Ms.Fischer statedthatanyonewhothinksthatshewasagainst the Madison Square projectis mistaken.Shethenreiteratedthatsheisforaffordablehousingin the City. Sheadded that theCitywillnevergetconsensusforfour (4)story tall MadisonSquare project.She stated that tolimittheparkinginthis type of areais considered discrimination.Ifparkingisgoing to be limited,then it should belimited across the boardforall multi-family buildings.Shealso mentioned that shehasbeenhearingtalk about sharingparking spaces with the churches near the Madison Square project but nothing has materialized yet.LastMs.Fischer stated that for the betterment of the community that we dogetaMadisonSquare,shewillbe voting Noon the four(4) stories for Madison Square. Ms.Kahn Ms.Kahn stated that she understands the impetus to weigh on the side of aesthetics, but prefers to weigh her vote on needs of the people.She stated that there isa certain irony when the discussion on parking and discrimination is mentioned.She stated that the community has been fighting for this project foralong time.The areais pedestrian friendly,with the Metro Rail station nearby.Shealso stated that she would vote for the project tobefour(4)stories and stated that shehasheard the comments from the community regarding Family Dollar andisnotinfavor of the future tenant,but thinks that itis important to move forwardandset the parameters forit.After Dr.Philips spoke,Ms.Kahn added that that the discrimination liesin the fact that theareawas populated with its own businesses before.She then stated that part of this project is to put affordable housing while the other partistoput the Family Dollarasan anchor to stimulate business in the area.She closed with stating that she would like to see a rebirth of self-sustaining businesses in the community. Dr.Philips Dr.Philips recalleda different iterationoftheproject that wouldhavebeentallagainst theadjacentsingle family residences.Shethengaveanexampleofhowtheheightcould be managed so that the portions of the projecthadfour(4)stories that was set back furtherawayfromresidentialwiththeremainingportionsbeing set atthree(3)story with the portions closertotheresidencesbeing set at two (2)stories.Shealso stated that because the projectisnearpublic transportation,itisvery generous tothink that each of the familieslivingin the proposed residences willhave two (2)vehicles.People should beaskedif they wouldliketogiveup one (1)of the parkingspacesso that it could be used for the commercial uses.She then stated that she was for the project. Mr.Basu Mr.Basu stated that MadisonSquarehas been the topicofdiscussionforalong time and the best news is that the Cityhas someone that iswilling to finance the project.He then stated that hehasseveral issues with the project whichareasfollows: 1.Affordable Housing-How does the city safeguard the affordable housing so that itis available for South Miami residents.Mr.Pepe explained that the development agreement speaks to the requirements for obtaining housing in the project.Mr. Basu then asked if there will be a combination of market rate and affordable housing within the project,ofwhichMr.Pepe stated no.Itwillallbe affordable housing. 2.Parking-When it comes toparking,some of the residents will not have two (2) vehicles.The project is within walking distance to public transportation.He also feels that this isan opportunity where the community will come together and figure out how to resolve the parking issue. 3.SW64th Street -the street has a wide ROW with different uses that allows for multimodal transportation.Because of that,there should bea comprehensive look at the corridor. 4.Transitional Zoning-Thedesignis sensitive to the transitional zoning from commercial to residential.He then asked if the third (3)floor couldbe set back furthertoaidinthistransition.If notalong SW 64th Street,atleastalongthe SW 60th Avenue side. Motion:Dr.Philipsmoved to approve PB-17-008 as presented with Staffs recommendations. The motion was seconded byMr.Melow. Ms.Fischer stated that there aremoreopportunitiesforaffordablehousing.Toputallthe densityintoone(1)projectisnot the rightthingtodo.Affordablehousingshouldbe scattered throughoutthecityasopposedtoone specific location.Sheclosedbystatingthatwhenalarge amount ofpressureisappliedtoaspecificproject,it will neverworkout. Ms.Glavey encouragedeveryonetogoogle parking best practices.Shethenstated that this would befirsttimethatitwas implemented inthe City which isan innovative thingtodo.She also recommended that there becarsharefortheproject. Vote:Yes 5.Wo 1 (Fischer) Mr.Melow:Yes Ms.Glavey:Yes Mr.Basu:Yes Ms.Fischer:No Ms.Kahn:Yes Dr.Philips:Yes Motion:Ms.Glavey movedtoapprove PB-17-011 as presented with Staffs recommendations. The motion was seconded byMr.Melow. Vote:Yes 5.No 1 (Fischer! Dr.Philips:Yes Ms.Kahn:Yes Ms.Fischer:No Mr.Basu:Yes Ms.Glavey:Yes Mr.Melow:Yes Motion:Ms.Glaveymovedtoapprove PB-17-009 as presented with Staffs recommendations. The motion was seconded byMr.Melow. Vote:Yes 5.No 1 (Fischer) Mr.Melow:Yes Ms.Glavey:Yes Mr.Basu:Yes Ms.Fischer:No Ms.Kahn:Yes Dr.Philips:Yes Motion:Dr.Philips moved to approve PB-17-010 as presented with Staffs recommendations. The motion was seconded byMs.Kahn. Vote:Yes 5.No 1 (Fischer) Dr.Philips:Yes Ms.Kahn:Yes Ms.Fischer:No Mr.Basu:Yes Ms.Glavey:Yes Mr.Melow:Yes 5.PB-17-012 Applicant:City of South Miami A Resolution relatin^p a imBBflMBove1 sin. 6.PB-17-013 Applicant:City of South Miami A Resolution relating)a KirMmH^r^OHove eg|y M^tflASein pplicable increase in the onthe East Madison Square property pplicable o^NKHv all increase in the on the West Madison Square property V.Public Comments/New Business The Chairperson opened the floor to public comments and any new business. Public Comments Section •Commissioner Walter Harris stated that the Commission had already decided that the building would be set at three (3)stories and that hewas working with the City Attorney to craft language to that effect.Ms.Fischer stated that the Board approved a height offour(4)stories with a recommendation for three (3)stories. •Bishop Jones,Marice Chael,and Levy Kelly each approached the podium and thanked the Board for their vote on the items before them. New Business Section •Ms.Fischer stated that eleven (11)outofninety-one(91)unitsin the MetroSouthbuilding acrossfrom City Hall havebeenallocatedtoSouth Miami residents.After looking intowhythis wasthecase,shefoundout that the building onlyhadaTemporaryCertificateofOccupancy. Becauseof that thecompanymanagingthe building doesn't havetodiscloseanyinformation until the CertificateofOccupancyhas been issued.She then stated that she still wants toknow howanyunits will be allocated to South Miami and thatshe would like toseethata majority of those units allocated for South Miami residents. TheChairpersonclosed the floortopublic comments andany new business. VI.Approval of the Minutes 1.SpecialPlanningBoard Meeting Minutes of March 22,2017: The Board unanimously approvedthemeetingminuteswithchanges.Therewasnomotion held for the action. 2.RegularPlanningBoard Meeting Minutes of March 14,2017 The Board unanimously approved the meeting minutes with changes.Therewasno motion held for the action. VII.Future Meeting Date: A)Regular Meeting -June 13,2017at7:00P.M. VIII.Adjournment Motion:Dr.Philips movedtoapprove PB-17-010 aspresentedwith Staffs recommendations.The motion was seconded by Ms.Kahn. Mr.Basu adjourned the meeting at 8:22P.M. 4#MiSouth''Miami THE GITY OF PLEASANT LIVING May 18,2017 City of South Miami Attn:Jane Tompkins,AICP 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami,FL 33143 SUBJECT:Madison Square West:5978SW 64th Street (folio 09-4025-010-0010),6415SW 60th Avenue (folio 09-4025-010-0030),6429 SW 60th Avenue (folio 09-4025-010-0040), 6442SW 59th Place (folio 09-4025-010-0180),6420SW 59th Place (folio 09-4025- 010-0160),andvacantlotswith the following folionumbers:09-4025-010-0050,09- 4025-010-0020,09-4025-010-0140,and 09-4025-010-0170 DearMrs.Tompkins, Thisistocertify that theattachedownershiplist,mapandmailinglabelsarea complete and accurate representationofthe real estatepropertyand property ownerswithin500feet radius of the externalboundariesof the subjectpropertieslistedabove,including the subjectproperty. This reflects the most current recordson the fileinMjami-DadeCountyProperty Appraisers' Office. Sincerely, Marcus Senior Pla ing Admin warn*.PAYNE WC0MWSSfCN#FF 920975 EXPiRES:October 5,2010 CityofSouth Miami |6130 Sunset Drive |South Miami,FL 33143-5093 305.663.6338 |southmiamifl.gov /NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI «,-,.,.-.. EXHIBIT uAn Planning andZoningDepartment 6130 Sunset Drive;SouthMiami,Florida33143 Phone:(305)663-6326;Fax #:(305)668-7335 OnTuesday,May 30,2017 at7:00P.M.,theCity of South Miami's Planning Boardwillconduct public hearings intheCityCommission Chambers atthe above address onthe following items: 1.PB-17-008 Applicant:City of SouthMiami AResolution pursuant toSection 2t)-3.5{D)(l)andother applicable provisionsof the CityofSouth MiamiLandDevelopmentCodeapprovinganincreasefromtwostoriestofourstoriesfora Mixed- UseProjecton the WestMadisonSquarepropertyaslegallydescribedherein. 2.PB-17-009 Applicant:City of SouthMiami AResolutionpursuanttoSection 20-3.5(D)(l)andother applicable provisions of the CityofSouth MiamiLandDevelopmentCodeapprovinganincreasefromtwostoriestofourstoriesfora Mixed- UseProjecton the EastMadisonSquarepropertyas legally described herein. 3.PB-17-010 Applicant:City of South Miami AResolutionrelatingtoa request foravariancefromSection20-4.4and other applicable provisionsoftheCity of SouthMiamiLandDevelopmentCodetoallowareductioninthe number ofparkingspacesprovidedfora Mixed-Use Projectonthe East MadisonSquarepropertyas legally described hereto. 4.PB-17-011 Applicant:City of SouthMiami AResolutionrelatingtoarequestforavariancefromSection20-4.4andotherapplicable provisions of the City of SouthMiamiLandDevelopmentCodetoallowareductioninthe number of parkingspacesprovidedforaMixed-UseProjectonthe West Madison Square propertyas legally described herein. 5.PB-17-012 Applicant:City of SouthMiami AResolutionrelatingtoa request foravariancefromSection 20-3.5(G)and other applicable provisionsoftheCityofSouthMiamiLandDevelopmentCodetoallowanincreaseinthe maximum impervious coverageforaMixed-UseProjectonthe East Madison Square property as legally described herein. 6.PB-17-013 Applicant:City of SouthMiami AResolutionrelatingtoa request foravariancefromSection 20-3.5(G)and other applicable provisions oftheCityofSouthMiamiLand Development Codeto allow anincreaseinthe maximum impervious coverageforaMixed-UseProjectonthe West Madison Square property as legally described herein. All interested parlies are urged to attend.Objections orexpressions of approval maybemadein person atthe hearing or filed in writing prior tooratthe hearing.The Planning Board reserves the right to recommend totheCity Commission whatever the board considers in thebest interest for the area involved.Interested parties requesting information are askedto contact the Planning and Zoning Departmentby calling 305-663-6326orwritingtothe address indicated above. Youareherebyadvised thatifany person desires to appeal anydecisionmadewith respect toany matter considered atthis meeting or hearing,such person willneeda record ofthe proceedings,andforsuch purpose mayneedto ensure thataverbatim record ofthe proceedings is made,which record includes thetestimony and evidenceupon which the appeal istobe based (F.S.286 0105).Referto hearingnumber whenmakingany inquiry. rr -1 SW64THST ,...< n,Jii,ii.H.imixijJiiiUj!..j. EXFfTBTT u k ••••PPPIPPP! MIAMI DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW Pubfished Dafly except Saturday.Sunday and LegalHolidays Miami,Miami'Oade County.Florida STATEOFFLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-OADE; Before the undersigned authority personally appeared MARIA MESA,who on oath says that he or she is the LEGAL CLERK.Legal Notices of the Miami Daily Business Review «kte Miami Review,a daily (except Saturday.Sunday and legal Holidays)newspaper,pubfished at Miami in Miami-Dade County,Florida;that the attached copy of advertisement, being a Legal Advertisement ofNotice in the matter of NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI -PB-17-008 -APPLICANT:CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI -MAY 30.2017-ETC inthe XXXX Court, was published insaid newspaper intheissuesof 05/18/2017 Affiant further says that the said Miami Daily Business Review is a newspaper pubfished at Miami,in said Miarm-Oade County.Florida and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in.said Miami-Dade. County,Florida each day (except Saturday.Sunday and Legal.Holidays)and has been entered as second .class mail matter at the post office in Miami in said Miami-Dade County. Florida,for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of \hB attached copy of advertisement;and affiant further says that he or she has neither paid nor promised any person,firm or corporation any discount,rebate,commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication r "-" Jpy^^t )*=?£z4t±*s (SEAL) MARIA MESA personally known tome NOTICI .i.v.'.-v-•.•'x->sM-«3 W^^m OnTue^.Mty^ :Bo^:^c^uctp^^ lift Project on theEntftiao^aa tegaBy t ^•v^v-Sir*-; 3,PB.17-010:i:}}:~^0^h•••':-W,-;-z<~v.±l:^-Z.:^.w.'.. •A ntibMfefl rirfirjafa taLo"ija^jptfac.a verfarto-fr^Stcflift2M.4 'a^iotfter awtfcaJfe proton*c4^ I^topmnrt Coda to a9ow.ii reduction Tn fo njmber of parfctog AppttcimfcChy^.,..-•"•;''.:-. A ReaotutlQnrelating toa inquest for a variance from Section 2CM.4 and other appdcabk provisions of th#City of South Miami Land DevelopmentCodato afiow a redaction In Ute numberofparking •pacts provided fora MfcteMJtt Project ontheWest MatSton Square propertyaslegally described herein. 3.PB-17-01? .Appicaith Cityof South Miami AJ^tutk»irtWlngtoar«*iftf andother apnSeaWe |>rc^slorui of Devttopmarrt Codatoallowan berets©In fha rMudaram lupervteua coverage tor a Mtaed-Ua*Prefect on the EastMadisonSquare •propeityas legale detcrlbed 6.HM7-013 ... Afjpftiaflfc^ofSoumMiamJ .' A fteipimonralaBng toa.reqattt for.a variancefrom Section 20-&6fG) and otter applicable provisions ofthe City ofSouth Miami Land OsvelOpinant Code toalowan Inciane In theinaximttn).litpervtous covered tor eMixscMJs*Projecton tr» property as jeoafly.dtstrfbed harem, Afl interested parte are uraod to.attend Obiecttora orexpr^ maybemade ti person at the hiear^orfiladrnwrttlrigpriortoormtrw hearing.The Planning Board reserves the right to reoomntend totheCay Commiaalon whateverthe rjoanJwr^efs Inthe rjaotimerest forthe aroa Irwolved.rr^featedparfiasreo^estii^ addressinoicated above. Youareherebyadvised that»anypersondesirestoappealany dsctskin matfe with respectto any matterconsidered,at this meetingor hearing, suchpersonwilneedarecordoftheproceedings,andforsuchpurpose mayneedtoensurethataverbatim record ofthe proceedings;Is made, which record includes matestimonyand evidence uponwhichtheappealisto Debased (F.S.286.0105).Referto hearing numberwhen rrtaJting any txjuiry. 5/19 .17-99/0OOO2261UM MIAMIDAILYBUSINESSREVIEW PublishedDtwlyo«eplSaturony.Sundayand Li-fialHobdays Wami.MiAm.0.ideCounty.Florida STATEOFFLORIDA COUNTYOFMIAMI-DADE; Beforetheundersignedauthoritypersonallyappeared MARIAMESA,whoonoathsaysthaiheorsheistheLEGAL CLERK.LegalNoticesoftheMiamiDailyBusinessReview «WaMiamiReview,adaily(exceptSaturday.Sundayand LegalHolidays)newspaper,publishedatMiamiinMiami-Dade CountyFlorida;thaitheattachedcopyotadvertisement, beingaLegalAdvertisementofNoticeinthematterof NOTICEOFPUBLICHEARING CITYOFSOUTHMIAMI-JUNE6.2017 intheXXXXCourt. waspublishedmsaidnewspaperintheissuesof AffiantrunnersaysthaithesaidMiamiDailyBusiness ReviewisanewspaperpublishedatMiami,insaid Miami-DadeCountyFloridaandthatthesaidnewspaperhas heretoforebeencontinuouslypublishedinsaidMiami-Dade County.Floridaeachday{excepiSaturday.Sundayand LegalHolidays)andhasbeenenteredassecondclassmail matteraithepes?officeinMiamimsaidMiami-DadeCounty. Floridaforaperiodofoneyearnextprecedingthefas! publicationoltheattachedcopyofadvertisementandaffianl furthersaysthatheorshehasneitherpaidnorpromisedany person,firmorcorporationanydiscount,rebate,commission orrefundfc^Jjtu^wnjos*^securingthisadvertisementtor public: (SEALI MARIAMESApersonallyknownlome ^wniiiia^ CITYOFSOUTHMIAMI NOTICEOFPUBLICHEARING NOTICEISHEREBYgiventhaitheCHyCommissionoftheCityofSouthMiamtFloridawillconductPubBcHearing*)atitsregularCityCommon meetingscheduledforTuesday.June6.2017.beginningat7:00pm,tntheDty Srnris^Chamoers.6130SunsetDrive,toconsiderthefollowingftemfe): AResolutionauthoriiingtheCityManagertonegotiateandtoenterintoamulti-yearcontractwithSouthMiamiYouthBaseballLeague.Inc. rSMYBL*)forthemanagementofyouthbasebaBservicesatPalmerPark. AResotuttonauthorizingtheCityManagertoenterintomum-year agreementswithAshbritt.Ins..andBergeronEmergerwy'Service*Linel. forDisasterDebrisRemovalandOlsposalServicesthroughapiggyback fromaCityofNorthMiamiBeachcontract AResolutionoftheMayorandCityCommissionoftheCHyofSou* Miami.Florida,authoriringtheCityManagertoexecuteamuM-yeartnter-local AgreementwithMiami-DadeCounty,andtheMiaml-OadePoliceDepartment, forSchoolCrossingGuardServices. fAResolutionapprovingaUnityofTitleforthePropertiesLocatedat> 5978SW64thSWetpolio09-4025-010-0010).6415SW60thAvenue (folio09-4025-010-0030).6429SW60thAvenue(folio09-402S-010-0040). 6442SW59thPlace(folio09-4025-010-0180).6420SWS9thPlace(folio 09-4025-010-0160).andvacantlotswiththefoHovWngfolionumbers;09-4025-010^)050.09-4025-010-0020.09-4025-010-0140.and09-4025- '010-0170, AResolutionapprovingaUnity6tTitletorthePropertiesLocatedat SM48W64thStreet(folio09-4025-010-0270).6401SW59Place(folio 09-4026-010-0260).6411SW59Place(folio09-4025-010-02B0).6415 SW59thPlace(foBo09-4025-010-0300).avacantlotwithafolk)^mber of09-4025-010-0310.and6443SW59Race(fofio09-4025-010-0320). AResolutionpursuanttoSection20-3.5(0)(1)andotherapplicable provisionsoftheCityofSouthMiamiLandDeveiopmert:Codeapproving anincreasefromtwostoriestotourstoriesforaMixed-UseProjecton theWestMadisonSquarepropertyaslegallydescribedherein. AResolutionpursuanttoSection20-3.5(0X1)and«««applicable provisionsoftheCityofSouthMiamiLandDevelopmentCodeapproving anincreasefromtwostoriestofourstoriesforaMixed-UseProieclonthe EastMadisonSquarepropertyaslegallydescribedherein. AResolutionrelatingtoarequestforavariancefromSection20-4.4and otherapplicableprovisionsoftheCityofSouthMiamiLandDevelopment Codetoallowareductioninthenumberofparkingspacesprovidedfor aMixed-UseProjectontheEastMadisonSquarepropertyaslegally AResolutionrelatingtoarequestforavariancefromSection20-4.4and otherapplicableprovisionsoftheCityofSouthMiamiLandDevelopment Codetoallowareductioninthenumberofparkingspacesprovidedfor aMixed-UseProjectontheWestMadisonSquarepropertyaslegally describedherein. AResolutionrelatingtoarequestforavariancefromSection20-3.5(G)and otherapplicableprovisionsoftheCityofSouthMiamiLandDevelopment Codetoallowanincreaseinthemaximumimperviouscoveragefora Mixed-UseProjectontheEastMadisonSquarepropertyaslegally describedherein. AResolutionrelatingtoarequestforavariancefromSection20-3.5{G)and otherapplicableprovisionsoltheCityofSouthMiamiLandDevelopment Codetoallowanincreaseinthemaximumimperviouscoveragefora Mixed-UseProjectontheWestMadisonSquarepropertyaslegally describedherein. AnOrdinanceamendingtheLandDevelopmeniCode.ArticleII.Section 20-2.3.'Definitions'andArticle111.Section20-3.6'SupplementalRegulations' addingsubsection(W)"SolarRequirements"andprovidingdefinitions relatingtoandcriteriaandregulationsforsolarcollectorsintheCityof SouthMiami. AnOrdinanceamendingtheCityofSouthMiamiLendDevelopment Code.ArticleIV.Section20-4.7(B)toclarifytheintentofthisSectionto includecommercialpropertiesandbyaddingsubsection(K)toprovide forscreeningoftheinteriorofvacantcommercialproperty. ALLinterestedpartiesareinvitedtoattendandwillbeheard. >contacttheCityClerk'sOfficeat:Forfurtherinformation,p 305-663-6340. MariaM.Menendez,CMC CityClerk PursuanttoFloridaStatutes286.0105,theCityherebyadvisesthepublic thatif8persondecidestoappealanydecisionmadebythisBoard.-Agency orCommissionwithrespecttoanymatterconsideredatitsmeetingor hearing,heorshewinneederecordoftheproceedings,andthatfors'uch purpose,affectedpersonmayneedtoensurethataverbatimrecordofthe proceedingsismadewhichrecordincludesthetestimonyandevidence uponwhichtheappealistobebased. 5/1917-10670000226232M 22SE I I NEIGHBORS !«•*•»«» MIAMIHERALDXOM CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI COURTESY NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY given lhai theCity Commission of ihe Cily ofSouth Miami.Florida will conduct Public Hearing(s)alits regular City Commission meeting scheduledlorTuesday,June6,2017,beginningat7:00p.m..inthe Ciiy CommissionChambers,6130SunsetDrive,lo considerthefollowing item(s,>: AResolutionauthorizingthe City Managerto negotiate andtoenterintoamulti-yearcontractwithSouthMiamiYouthBaseballLeague.Inc.CSMYBL ">ior the managementofyouthbaseballservicesatPalmerPark. AResolutionauthorizing Ihe CityManagertoenterintomulti-yearagreementswith Ashbritt.Inc..andBergeronEmergencyServices.Inc.,furDisasterDebris RemovalandDisposalServicesthroughapiggybackfromaCityofNorthMiamiBeachcontract. AResolutionoftheMayorandCily Commission oftheCityofSouthMiami.Florida,auihorizing theCityManagertoexecuteamulti-year lnicr-local AgreementwithMiami-Dade County,andtheMiami-DadePoliceDepartment,forSchoolCrossingGuardServices. (A ResolutionapprovingaUnityofTitleforthePropertiesLocatedat 5978 SW 64,h Street(folio 09-4025-010-001 Oj.6415SW60*Avenue i folio 09-4025-N 010-0030).6429 SW 60*Avenue (folio 09-4025-010-0040).6442 SW 591"Place (folio 09-4025-010-01S0».6420 SW 59*Place (folio 09-4025-010-0160),and/ vacantlotswiththe following folionumbers:09-4025-010-0050.09-4025-010-0020,09-4025-0 J0-0140.and 09-4025-010-0170.' AResolutionapprovingaUnityofTitleforthePropertiesLocatedat5944SW 64''Street (folio 09-4025-010-027(0,6401SW59Place rfolio 09-4025-010- 0280).6411 SW 59 Place (folio 09-4025-010-02^01.6415 SW 59*Place (folio 00-4025-010-0300).a vacant lot with a folio number ol 09-4025-010-0310.and 6443 SW 59 Place (folio 09-4025-010-03201. AResolutionpursuanttoSection 20-3.5(D)i11 andotherapplicableprovisionsofthe Ciiy ofSouthMiamiLandDevelopmentCodeapprovinganincreasefrom twosloriestofoursloriesfora Mixed-Use ProjectonIheWestMadisonSquare properly aslegally described herein. AResolutionpursuanttoSection 20-3.5(DK 1)andother applicable provisionsoftheCityofSouthMiamiLandDevelopmentCodeapprovinganincreasefrom twosloriestofourslories lor aMixed-UseProjectontheEastMadisonSquarepropertyaslegallydescribedherein. AResolutionrelatingtoarequestforavariancefromSection 20-4.4 andother applicable provision*ofthe Cily ofSouthMiamiLandDevelopment Code to allowareductionin Ihe numberofparkingspacesprovided lor aMixed-UseProjectontheHastMadisonSquarepropertyaslegallydescribedherein. A Resolution relatingloarequestioravariancefromSection 20-4.4 andother applicable provisionsoftheCilyoiSouthMiamiLandDevelopmentCode lo allowareductioninthenumberofparkingspacesprovidedfora Mixed-Use Projecton Ihc WestMadisonSquarepropertyaslegallydescribedherein. AResolutionrelatingtoarequestforavariancefromSection 20-3.5vG»andotherapplicableprovisionsoftheCityofSouthMiamiLand Development Code toallowanincreaseinthemaximumimperviouscoverageforaMixed-UseProjectontheEastMadisonSquarepropertyaslegallydescribedherein. AResolutionrelatingtoarequestforavariancefromSection 20-3.5tG>andotherapplicableprovisionsof Ihc City of SouthMiamiLandDevelopmentCode toallowanincreasein Ihe maximumimperviouscoverage f(»r aMixed-UseProjectontheWestMadisonSquareproperty as-legallydescribedherein. AResolutionauthorizingtheCityManagerloenterintoamulti-yearagreementwithLimousinesofSouthFlorida,Inc.,forapublictransportationcirculator service,bypiggybackingontoitscontractwiththe Cily of Avcnlura. AnOrdinanceamendingtheLandDevelopmentCode.Article 11,Section20-2.3."Definitions'*andArticle 111.Section20-3.6"SupplementalRegulations" addingsubsection (W)"Solar Requirements"andprovidingdefinitionsrelatingtoandcriteriaandregulationsforsolarcollectorsintheCityofSouihMiami. AnOrdinanceamending ihe Cily of SouthMiamiLand Development Code.Article IV.Section 20-4.7 (B,toclarify die intentofthisSectiontoinclude commercialpropertiesandbyaddingsubsection (K)toprovideforscreeningoftheinteriorofvacantcommercialproperty. AnOrdinancerelatingtotheCity's2017fiscalyearbudget:auihorizinganincreaseofappropriationsforexpenditurelineitem 125-1730-541-3450 People's Transportation TaxFundDirectTransit Contractual ServicesaccountintheamountofS70.500. ALL interestedparties areinvitedtoattendandwillbeheard. Forfurther information,pleasecontacttheCily Clerk's OMice at:305-663-6340. Maria M.Menendc/,CMC CityClerk Pursuantid Florida Stamies 2Xf>.0105.ihe Cily herebyadvises ihc public ihai il a permit decide-,10appealany dcir.sson madeby ihis BoardAgencyorCommission wiih respeei loan\manor considered .it lis meetingor hearing,heorshe wili need arecordoithe proceedings,.itul ihai ior stub pwipnse.allotted person may need is ensure thai a u'rhuuin record ol Ihe pioceedings i^made which record includesthetestimonyandevidenceupon which theappealis tobe based