Res. No. 162-97-10132RESOLUTION NO.162-97-10132
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,FLORIDA,RELATING TO APPROVAL OF A
TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM ACCOUNT NO.2100-519.64-40
"CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS"TO ACCOUNT NO.2100-519.99-20
"GENERAL CONTINGENCY;"AUTHORIZING CITY ADMINISTRATION
TO DISBURSE A SUM NOT TO EXCEED $5,611 FOR A STUDY
REQUIRED BY STATE OF FLORIDA RELATING TO TRANSPORTATION
FOR THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY THE FIRM OF C3TS,
CORZO,CASTELLA,CARBALLO THOMPSON &SALMAN,P.A.,
PURSUANT TO PREVIOUS APPROVAL GRANTED FOR SUCH STUDY
ACTIVITIES VIA RESOLUTION NO.30-96-9783;PROVIDING FOR
DISBURSEMENT FROM ACCOUNT NO.2100-519.99-20 "GENERAL
CONTINGENCY";AND,PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS,on February 6,1996,via Resolution No.30-96-9783,
the City Commission authorized the City Manager to enter contract
with selected firms for study proposals,when such contracts for
study activities do not exceed $25,000;and,
WHEREAS,the firm of Corzo,Castella,Carballo,Thompson &
Salman,P.A.,or "C3TS"is one of the firms specifically approved
and selected via Resolution No.30-96-9783;and,
WHEREAS,on May 12,1997,the City Manager did contract with
C3TS for study services not to exceed $10,000;and,
WHEREAS,upon completion ofthisstudy,the actual costis
$4,877.31,as documented in the attached "Exhibit 1;"and,
WHEREAS,said payment via transfer from Capital Improvements
to General Contingency must be approved by the City Commission.
.NOW,THEREFORE,BEIT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,FLORIDA:
Section 1.The sum of $5,611 is hereby transferred from
Account No.2100-519.64-40 "Capital Improvements"to Account No.
2100-519.99-20 "General Contingency."
Section 2.The City Administration is authorized to disburse
a sum not to exceed $5,611 to the firm of C3TS,Corzo,Castella,
Carballo,Thompson &Salman,P.A.,for study services rendered.
Section 3.The disbursement shall be charged to expenditure
Transportation Study Resolution:August 5,1997
Account No.2100-519.99-20 "General Contingency"after transfer
from Account No.2100-519.64-40 "Capital Improvements."
Section 4.This resolution shall take effect immediately
upon approval.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of August,1997
ATTEST:
qajlUjQ
ITY CLERK
READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY
approv:
COMMISSION VOTE:
Mayor Price:
Vice Mayor Robaina:
Commissioner Young:
Commissioner Bethel:
Commissioner Oliveros:
Transportation Study Resolution:August 5,1997
5-0
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
To:Mayor and City Commission Date:July 31,1997
^_^^_,Agenda Item #"'
FrorftTL.Dennis Whitt Re:Comm.Mtg.08/05/97
City Manager Transportation Study Resolution
REQUEST:
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,FLORIDA,
RELATINGTOAPPROVALOFATRANSFEROF FUNDS FROMACCOUNTNO.2100-519.64-40 "CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENTS"TO ACCOUNT NO.2100-519.99-20 "GENERAL CONTINGENCY;"AUTHORIZING CITY
ADMINISTRATION TO DISBURSE ASUMNOTTO EXCEED $5,611 FOR ASTUDY REQUIRED BYSTATE OF
FLORIDA RELATING TO TRANSPORTATION FOR THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY THE FIRM OF C3TS,
CORZO,CASTELLA,CARBALLO THOMPSON &SALMAN,P.A.,PURSUANT TO PREVIOUS APPROVAL
GRANTED FOR SUCH STUDY ACTIVITIES VIA RESOLUTION NO.30-96-9783;PROVIDING FOR
DISBURSEMENT FROM ACCOUNT NO.2100-519.99-20 "GENERAL CONTINGENCY";AND,PROVIDING FOR
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BACKGROUND &ANALYSIS:
On April 11,1997,the City of South Miami received the Department of Community Affairs'
response totheCity's proposed,17 EAR-based amendments.DCAis requiring studies tobe
performed,including dataand analyses,forthe State-required,new Transportation Element.
PursuanttoResolutionNo.30-96-9783,theCityManagerisauthorizedtocontractservicesfor
study activities from selected firms.OnMay 12,1997,pursuant tothis approval the services of
C3TS were secured forthe preparation ofa revised Transportation Element forDCA approval.
The attached resolution isto approve the transfer of funds from the Capital Improvements fund
totheGeneral Contingency fund,inordertocoverthecostofthisstudywhichis $5,611.
RECOMMENDATION:Approval.
Proposed Resolution for Adoption
Resolution No.30-96-9783 and attachment
Invoice andCopy Charges fromfirm of C3TS
Work Order for Professional Services
Excerpted ORC Report from Florida DCA
CityManager'sReport:TransportationStudy Resolution
RESOLUTION NO.30-96-9783
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF SOUTH MIAMI,FLORIDA,AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
RETAIN THREE FIRMS AS CONSULTANTS UNDER CONTINUING
SERVICES CONTRACT WHERE THE BASIC CONSTRUCTION COST DOES
NOT EXCEED $500,000 PER PROJECT,AND FOR STUDY ACTIVITIES
WHEN THE FEE DOES NOT EXCEED $25,000.
WHEREAS,the City of South Miami,Florida proposes projects
that require the expertise of architects and/or engineers tobe
appropriately contracted;and
WHEREAS,the City of South Miami,Florida requires the
preparation of specifications and review of these projects to
assure successful implementation;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,FLORIDA:
Section 1.That the Mayor and City Commission ofthe City
of South Miami,Florida acknowledges that fourteen firms submitted
proposals to serve as the City's consultant and that four (4)firms
that met all of the established criteria were identified by a
review committee;
Section 2.That the Mayor and City Commission of the City
of South Miami,Florida authorizes the City Manager to enter
contracts with the three firms selected by the Mayor and Commission
from the four firms identified by the selection committee,for
study activities when the fee does not exceed $25,000 and basic
construction projects where thecostdoesnot exceed $500,000.
Section 3
upon approval.
This resolution shall take effect immediately
XPASSEDANDADOPTEDthis_J day of February 6/1996
CITY CLERK
READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM:
6-TL-
CITY ATTORNEY
APPROVED.
MAYOR
MAYORCARVER YEA NAY
ViCE MAYOR YOUNG YEA ~s NAY
COMMISSIONER BAGS YEA \S NAY
COMMISSIONER COOPERYEA w/NAY
COMMISSIONER CUNNINGHAM YEA
V
NAY If
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
To:Mayor &City Commission Date:January 25,1996
from*—Eddie Cox /
City Manager '
Agenda Item #
Re:Comm.Meeting 2/6/96
Architectural and
Engineering Services
20
Recognizing theneedfor occasional consulting services of
Architectural and Engineering firms,the City issued a request
for proposals from qualified firms interested in providing such
services tothe city.Services tobeprovidedwould include
basic construction where costs is not in excess of $500,000,and
forstudyactivitieswhenthefeedoesnotexceed $25,000.
Our objectives was to identify several firms that could provide a
full scope of services.A review committee of three members of
city staff were appointed by the City Manager to review the
proposals andidentify firms whichcouldbestprovidea full
rangeof services to the city.
Sonia Lama (Acting Director,Building &Zoning),Diana Morris,
(Assistantto City Manager),andBillPratt(Director,Office of
Development),reviewed theproposals using a uniform criteria
sheet.One member ofthereviewcommitteerequestedremovalfrom
the review process (see attached memo).Thetwo remaining
membersofthe review committee averaged theirrating sheets,and
based onthe highest scores,presented four firms which metthe
necessary criteria.
Those firms are:
Corzo,Castella,Carballo,Thompson,Salmam
The Architectural Design Consortium,Inc.
M.C.Harry and Associates
Bermello,Ajamil &Partners,Inc.
Irequestthe Commission approve three firms from thisgroupto
serveas consultants tothe city for projects requiring such
expertise and services.
//
INVOICE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CORZO
CASTELLA
CARBALLO
THOMPSON
SALMAN
Engineers
Arc hi tecfs
Planners
BBBRj BWWWBWWlj
i^05.^2900J!8b0.448.02271L
fef acsimite ^3 05.445.3 366JIL.
^B0005022 5WAAC002142llf®Ii
Project 1929-02 Ear related Transportation ElSea?""*"*
ranmni
lite 90a
Project Billing Summary
Professional Services
Reimbursable Expense
Total
Approved by
famon Castella,P.E.
C3TS
DATE
Prior Current Total
4,864.00 728.00 5,592.00
13.31 5.33 18.64
4,877.31 733.33 5,610.64
?
IfFOEiyp
m -1 ^
PUNNING DfviS-ON
f
II
EqualOpportunity Employer
:.*t,..V>
•-*•-airr1--v -!*v •
Phone 444-6605
BLUE/BLACK LINES •MYLARS-SEPIAS
SHACOH 36SCREEN
HIGH SPEED DUPLICATING —OFFSET PRINTING
214-220 VALENCIA AVE.CORAL GABLES.FLA.33134
/Customer s
Order No._
Name.
Address.
.Dote
<r jz£S^t
SOLDBYCASH C.O.D.CHARGE ON ACCT MOSE.
RETD.
PAID OUT
DESC RIPTION AMOUNT
Auf c-w//M5 ^C,ov_
\>Q.
\*«?<\~&i-<i\
Tax
IB
•s
"2^
3tVT^cx-lo Total S >^
All claims and returned goods MUST be occomponied by this bill.
MR-503-W 146456 sELLBUSINESS FORMS -DAVIE.FLSJS14
S£r-.mm ,^^§mmM
1
..»"1
CORZO
CASTELLA
CARBALLO
THOMPSON
SALMAN
INVOICE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Engineers
Architects
Planners
$01 Ponce de Leon^lvdTSuite 900 ;|!p
;;p3^7;CkibiesHvl^da "33134W
3305.445.2900 1.800.448.0227 W
;Facsimile^305.445.3366*^^
EB0005022 '^AAC002142 *
•^""'—•*--•-'"na ifaMKatiaMflteBaiadiJ Ba
Page number 1
Project 1929-02 Ear related Transportation Element
01-Technical assistance.
City of South Miami Building Dept.
6130 Sunset Drive
South Miami,Fl 33143
Mr.Bill Mackey,AICP
Professional Services
£°r,P^°fessic-nal services rendered in connection with approval
Work Order dated 5-12-97.
Professional Services
PRINCIPAL
Ramon Castella,P.E.
PROJECT INVESTIGATION
6-22-97
PROJECT COORDINATION
6-29-97
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
6-29-97
QUALITY CONTROL
6-22-97
6-29-97
ENGINEER-E.I./ARCHITECT-A.I,
Gonzalo Aleman,Jr.
PROJECT INVESTIGATION
6-08-97
CADD WORK
6-08-97
6-15-97
6-22-97
6-29-97
REPORTS &STUDIES
6-15-97
6-22-97
6-29-97
Hours Rate Amount
1.00 80.00 80.00
.50 80.00 40.00
1.50 80.00 120.00
4.50
1.50
80.00
80.00
360.00
120.00
7.00 64.00
1.00 64.00
6.00 64.00
2.00 64.00
3.00 64.00
9.00 64.00
25.00 64.00
11.00 64.00
448.00
64.00
384.00
128.00
192.00
576.00
1,600.00
704.00
(I
EqualOpportunityEmployer
INVOICE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CORZO
CASTELLA
CARBALLO
THOMPSON
SALMAN
Engineers
Architects
Planners
Coral -Gables,|Florida ^g '$&
305.445.2900 1,800.448.0227 ,,^|
Facsimile ~^305.445.3366
EB0005022 ;-AAC002142 Invoice number
June 30,1997
Page number 2Project1929-02 Ear related Transportation Element
Professional Service:Hours Rate
DATA PROCESSOR (SECRETARY/EEO)
Amount
Ivonne M.Moran
CLERICAL
6-15-97
6-22-97
1.00
1.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
Services total 75.00 4,864.00
ReimbursableExpense Cost Mult Amount
Reproduction
6-26-97 146299 13.31 1.00
Reimbursable total
Invoice total
13.31
13.31
V 4,877.31
ProjectBilling Summary Prior Current Total
Professional Services .00 4,864.00 4,864.00
Reimbursable Expense .00 13.31 13.31
Total .00 4,877.31 4,877.31
Approved by
Ramon Castella,P.E
C3TS
\LAumLAyJui^Cr
tCLlik it vx."±_y
JUL-8 1997
Wltf^l Pi •:•,'I :-'••"-.••'-\<
date;Q^zQJzfOl
l\
EqualOpportunity Employer
-6505
BlUE/BLACK LINES •MYLARS-SEPIAS
SHACOH 36SCREEN
HIGH SPEED DUPLICATING -OFFSET PRINTING
214-220 VALENCIA AVE.CORAL GABLES,FLA.33134
All claims
MR-503-W
and returned goods MUST be accompanied by this bill.
146299 ^ji"**'BILL BUSINESS FORMS •OAVIC.FL 333l«
I *''
i i
I <
n
C O P.z o
C AM fc I I A !
«V -^KB>v L>*r»j
THOMPSON
Engineer,
Architects
Planner*
EB0005022
AAC002142
TO:
ATTENTION:
WORK nqpER fOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
City of South Miami
Building.Zoning and Community Development Dept
6130 Sunset Drive.2nd floor
South Miami.Florida 33143
Bill Mackey,AiCP.
Director of Planning &Zoning
PROJECT NAME:EAR-related Transportation Element
ComprehensivePlanAmendment
DATE:5/12/97
FILE:SM
DESCRIPTIONOFSERVICES:
^SS^^^lSSit0 D!?artment <*Community Affairs objections,recommendationsT22ZiT9)regard'n9 EAR-re,ated Transportation Element Comprehensive PlanAmendmentReviseAmendmenttoincorporatetheinformation,studies and analysis requested
TERMS AND CONDITIONS.
All terms and conditions shall be per our General Agreement for Professional Services Our fee
for the above described services shall be based on the following hourly rates,with the total not to
exceed $10,000:
Principal $80.00/hr.
Project Engineer (P.E.)$65 007nr
Project Engineer (E.I.)$55 00/hr.'
Designer $55.00/hr.
Senior Technician t $50.00/hr.
Technician _$45.00/hr.
Data Processor $25.00/hr.
We are ready to begin working on this assignment upon your authorization to proceed.If
acceptable to you,we will accept a signed copy of this form as your written authorization to
proceed with the assignment.
Thank you.
loCastellaCarballo^homotfqp^alman,PA.
Smon Castella,P.
Vice-President
RC/er
Cityof South Miami
Approved}by:
W4(f^6^fL
Date:ob/W'??
CWIOPOSALV3MMJ91K7 I
Pone*do imoA Bkd.JSuin 9<901 900 Coral Gobb*.Florida 33134 302.445.2900 1.800 448.0227 Facsimile 305.445.3366
EqualOpportunity Employer
//
OBJECTIONS,RFCOIVTMENDATTONS Aivn rn^pc prrmT
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI ^^
AMENDMENT 97-1ER
Amend mpnt at £•Transpo^^on men^pn+.
E^en.mto one new TransputJ^^
meet me mmimum requirements for the Transportation Element as required by Rute 9fs 019F.A.C While most of the existing data is applicable to the new transpoSn dS*^^da*and analysis is insufficient to satisfy the completely new npJ^gS^S^and Analysis section does not include sufficient analysis of land nm^nmpJi^SS^SSmultimodalconnectionsandconsiderationofvariousFLUMalternatives.^SSTSSh
P^ariP^^^
mf^LTTOrfn ^^"**"*"*^-tedDev'lopmentlS££$££**«L™Z%?T t0 Pr°?0t?redevel°Pment **«alternative forms of transportation,the
ST m!.TL1S "bTflCial t001 by Which me Ci*<*»meet its 8oaIs-Furthermore the2LS?aT^6?A t?^anUmber °f bm routes which create ammtimodal transportationnetworkTherefore,the Department recommends that the City address the following Rules which
are insufficiently addressed by the proposed amendment:
ORC Objection:The proposed Transportation Element does not include the following data
and analysis requirements of Rule 9J-5.019 (2)and (3):
1.(2)(a)l.d.significant parking facilities;
2.(2)(a)7.intermodal terminals and access to intermodal facilities;
3.(2)(a)10.the major public transit trip generators and attractors based upon the
existing land use map or map series;
4.(3)(d)an analysis of the growth trends and travel patterns and interactions;
between land uses and transportation,the compatibility between the future
land use and transportation element;
5.(3)(e)an analysis of the projected intermodal deficiencies and needs such as
terminals,connections,high occupancy vehicle lanes,park-and-ride lots
and other facilities;
6.(3)(f)an analysis of projected transportation system needs;
7.(3)(g)an analysis of the compatibility of the transportation system needs with the
FDOT Adopted Work Program,long range transportation plan and plans
/'
ofthe MPO,and the compatibility with the policies and guidelines of these
8"(3)(h>TdnZ*?*Tll demonstrate how ««»toed government will maintain its9(V(T),h™1 IeVel^,service standards for roads and transit facilities;and9.(3)(I)the analysis shall explicitly address and document internal consistency;
tnm«™2?GOa1!'°bjeCtives **PoIicies have not been sufficiently updated to address the
u 2™^y^^^^^^edongenerators/attractors;
13 4 c9''th^^StotegieSt0mpr0VesyStem13.(4)(c)9.establish ^xid use,site and building design guidelines for accessability to transit
SSn'f tobHshtnUmfCal mdicators to measure achievement of mobility goals;and(4)(c)ll.coordinate with other local governments for areawide transportation coordination.
14
15
The following Rules are insufficiently addressed by the Goals,Objectives and Policies:
16.(4)(b)2.coordinate transportation system with FLUM;
Objective 1.2 does not adequately address this rule.The Objective should include
language to insure that future land use,population densities,housing and
employment patterns are consistent with the area's transportation modes and
services based on analysis of FLUM alternatives.
17.(4)(c)l.establish level of service standards at peak hour for roads and transit facilities;
Policy 1.1.1:Policy language should include specific reference to level of service
for transit facilities.Furthermore,the local government shall adopt the level of
service standards established by the FDOT for facilities on the Florida Intrastate
Highway System.
In addition,the City is proposing aTCEA for which the City has not adequately addressed
h ?^A10n t0 CStabIiSh POlideS Which specify P™S™™to address transportation needs withintheTCEA.The Department believes that,if the City adds the above mentioned citations the
requirements of the TCEA will be met pursuant to Rule 9J-5.0055(6)(c),F.A.C.
The Future Transportation Map does not include:
18.(5)(a)l.e.-parking facilities that are required to achieve mobility goals;
II
19.(5)(a)4.-TCEA,as proposed;and
20.(5)(a)9.-intermodal terminals and access to such facilities.
Recommendation:The Transportation Element should be revised to address the new
requirements and provide specific objectives and implementing policies to integrate the
transportation system and land uses as amultimodal system.Much of the Data and Analysis can
be obtained through the Dade County MPO and Dade County.Items 1,2,3,5 and 6are already,
or will be available through Dade County Planning,the Dade County Metropolitan Planing
Organization,the Metro-Dade Transit Agency,or the Florida Department of Transportation,
although the data inventory maintained by the City should already include the parking,terminal
connections,andmajor attractors/generators.
Regarding item 4,the MPO/Dade County can provide modeling results that address existing
growth trends,travei patterns and land use/transportation alternatives.For the remainder of item
4,related to the compatibility between the FLUM and the Transportation Element,as well as items
5,6,and 8,which are all dependent on alternative land use strategies,the analyses must be
developed in coordination with the MPO and Dade County.For these items the City should
consider various land use alternatives,particularly withinthe TODD and RID where multimodal
interaction occurs.This land use information should be provided tothe MPO for inclusion in the
Dade County MPO Long Range Transportation Plan Model (MPOLRTPM)to determine if
alternative land uses would affect the transportation system.
Items 10-15,and 17 should be addressed at this time in conjunction with the MPO and
subsequently refined in 1998 following the MPOLRTP.For item 16,were the City anticipates data
to become available at a later date,such as data updated in the 1998 update to the Dade County
MPOLRTP,me Department recommends that the City adopt Objectives and Policies which commit
to an update ofthe City's Plan at such a time when the specific information becomes available.
Comments:Page 69,Objective 1.6:
This objective states that by 1996 the City will establish a transportation concurrency
management area (TCMA)in conjunction with the approved Metro-Dade County transportation
concurrency management area located east of the Palmetto Expressway.However,this area is
defined as a transportation concurrency exception area (TCEA)pursuant to Section 163.3180(5),
F.S.A transportation concurrency management area has a different meaning as defined by Section
163.3180(7),F.S.Should the City desire to designate a TCEA,then the word 'management'in
Objective 1.6 should be changed to 'exception'.
Future Traffic Circulation Map:
Dade County is concerned that this map designates SW56 Street and SW67Ave within the
City as County Collector roadways.The Metro-Dade Comp Plan Traffic Circulation Element
designates both roadways as County Minor Arterials.The City should redesignate the SW 56 Street
and SW67Avenuetobe consistent withthe Metro-Dade County CDMP.
II