17Sout~iami
THE C!TY OF PLEASANT LIVING
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
To: The Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Commission
VIA: Steven Alexander, City Manager
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Jane K. Tompkins, AICP, Planning Direct~
June 7, 2016 Agenda Item NO.:i1
An Ordinance amending Section 20-5.4, "Complete applications required," Section 20-5.5,
"Applications requiring public hearings," and Section 20-5.6, "Applications in general," of the
South Miami land Development Code to establish requirements for a transportation impact
analysis, and other changes including correction of names, clarifying notice requirements, and
establishing authority to defer an item.
BACKGROUND:
The Land Development Code provides that development approvals shall not be issued when the
level of service (LOS) for public services and facilities do not meet or exceed LOS Standards or
when the issuance of an approval would result in the reduction of the actual LOS for any service
or facility below the established Standard (Sec. 20-4.1, "Adequate public facilities and
services"). LOS Standards for streets are provided in the LDC; however, the Code does not
specify how to determine traffic impacts for development applications. Traffic impact analyses
are not required as part ofthe application package. Such studies are a critical tool in evaluating
an application, and should be conducted to ensure that the code requirements are met.
The LDC also does not reflect the current organization and titles of City Departments and
positions; this ordinance will make the appropriate changes as well.
ANALYSIS:
Article V, "Procedures and Applications" of the LDC specifies the application requirements for
the various development-related applications (for example, rezonings, site plan reviews, and
variances). The LDC does not currently list a traffic impact analysis as a requirement, but such
studies are essential to thoroughly evaluating an application. Consequently, staff proposes
requiring a traffic impact analysis for all applications consisting of more than twenty-five (25)
residential units or more than 10,000 square feet of commercial space. Applications generating
fewer than seventy-five (75) trips may be required to provide a traffic impact analysis if the
Director of the Planning and Zoning Department determines that the application presents the
possible introduction of impacts that justify an analysis. The Director may also waive the
requirement for projects proposing no more than twenty-five (25) residential units or up to
10,000 square feet of commercial space or if he/she believes the transportation impacts can be
resolved during concurrency review or will produce de minimus impact. Trip generation rates
Transportation Impact Analysis Text Amendment
June 7, 2016
Page 2 of 2
will be taken from professionally recognized sources and the size of the area to be studied will
vary based on the number of trips generated.
The ordinance also makes the changes necessary to reflect the current organization of the City's
departments, clarifies that the Planning Board and City Commission may defer or continue a
hearing in order to receive additional information deemed necessary for their review, and
clarifies the notice requirements for hearings. • ,
PLANNING BOARD ACTION: •
After the public hearing held on the item at the Planning Board's May 10, 2016 meeting, the
Board recommended approval of PB-16-013 with a vote of 5 to 2.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adoption of the proposed ordinance will require that certain applicants submit a traffic impact
analysis, which will assist the City in evaluating the application and ensure the City's standards
are satisfied. It is recommended that the City Commission approve the proposed amendment
to the Land Development Code.
Attachments:
• Draft Resolution
• Draft Planning Board Meeting Minutes Excerpt, dated May 10,.2016
ORDINANCE NO. ______ _
2
3 An Ordinance amending Section 20-5.4, "Complete applications
4 required," Section 20-5.5, "Applications requiring public hearings," and
5 Section 20-5.6, "Applications in general," of the South Miami Land
6 Development Code to establish requirements for a transportation impact
7 analysis, and other changes including correction of names, clarifying
8 notice requirements, and establishing authority to defer an item.
9
10 WHEREAS, the Land Development Code does not specify how to determine
11 traffic impacts for applications requiring a public hearing; and
12
13 WHEREAS, the Land Development Code states, "A development permit,
14 Certificate of Completion (CC), Certificate of Occupancy (CO), or Certificate of Use and
15 Occupancy (CU) shall not be issued when level of service for public services and
16 facilities do not meet or exceed LOS Standards or when the issuance of a development
17 permit and/or CC and/or CO and/or CU would result in reduction of the actual LOS for
18 any service or facility below the established LOS Standards;" and
19
20 WHEREAS, the Capital Improvement Element of the City's Comprehensive
21 Plan, CIP Policy 1.3.1, states "The development code shall continue to specify that no
22 development permit shall be issued unless assurance is given that the public facilities
23 necessitated by the project (in order to meet the level-of-service standards established in
24 the FLUE and other Elements) will be in place concurrent with the impacts of the
25 development;" and
26
27 WHEREAS, in addition to the analysis of traffic impacts required for
28 concurrency, it is important to determine and address the impacts arising from traffic
29 generated by proposed developments during the public approval processes specified by
30 the Land Development Code; and
31
32 WHEREAS, the City Commission desires to amend the Land Development Code
33 to require a transportation impact analysis for proposed new developments and
34 redevelopments when appropriate, and this ordinance accomplishes the above objectives;
35 and
36
37 WHEREAS, due to various Departmental reorganizations over the years, certain
3 8 sections of the Land Development Code continue to refer to the building and zoning
39 department and building and zoning department director, and this ordinance will correct
40 these sections relevant to the hearing process to refer to the Planning and Zoning
41 Department and Planning and Zoning Director; and
42
43 WHEREAS, it is also important to clarify that the Planning Board and City
44 Commission have authority to defer a hearing to receive additional necessary information
45 for their decisions, particularly in light of the new requirement of a transportation impact
46 analysis, and thus the Code language is clarified to allow for such deferrals.
1
1
2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
3 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA:
4
5 Section 1. Section 20-5.4, "Complete applications required," of the Land Development
6 Code, City of South Miami, Florida, is hereby amended and shall read as follows:
7
8 20-5.4 -Complete applications required.
9 (A) Completeness Determination. An application for any review under this Code shall
lObe submitted in the appropriate format and shall contain all infonnation required by this
11 article. Upon receipt of an application, the ElDirector of the builEling Planning and
12 Olf;oning Department (hereinafter referred to in this Section as "Director") shall review
13 such application for completeness.
14 (1) If the ElDirector finds that such application is not complete, he or she shall return
15 it to the applicant with a specific list of missing items or other deficiencies.
16 (2) If the ElDirector finds that such application is complete, he or she shall submit it
17 for processing in accordance with this Code.
18 (B) Filing Fee Required. No application shall be considered complete unless
19 accompanied by the proper filing fee.
20
21 Section 2. Section 20-5.5, "Applications reqmrmg public hearings," of the Land
22 Development Code, City of South Miami, Florida, is hereby amended and shall read as
23 follows:
24 20-5.5 -Applications reqniring public hearings.
25 All required public hearings shall be advertised in a newspaper of general circulation and
26 the same advertisement shall be published in a local newspaper, if available, so as to
27 provide as much notice as possible within the City, but, in any event, the notice in the
28 local newspaper need not be published ten (10) days before the public hearing. The
29 timeliness of the publication in the local newspaper shall not be grounds for challenging
30 the action taleen unless such a newspaper is available for publication and then only if it
31 was published less than five (5) days before the proposed action is taken. The word
32 "newspaper of general circulation" shall mean the Daily Business Review, or similar
33 newspaper. The word "local newspaper" shall mean a newspaper distributed in the City
34 of South Miami, whether fi'ee to its readership or otherwise available. The following
35 procedures set forth in this section 20-5.5 shall be followed for all applications requiring
36 a public hearing before the !3Elanning b.!1oard and e~ity eCommission, including all
37 applications for rezoning, text amendments, special uses and variances.
38 (A) Preapplication Conference. Prospective applicants shall first schedule a
39 preapplication meeting with the ElDirector of the bllilEling Planning and Olf;oning
40 Department (hereinafter referred to in this Section as "Director") to discuss and analyze
41 the proposed application request. No statements made or infonnation given during such
42 preapplication conference shall be binding upon the e~ity or prospective applicant.
43 (B) Required Submittal. At least thirty (30) calendar days prior to the first
44 scheduled public hearing date on the application, the applicant shall file a formal
45 application with the Planning and Zoning Department. At the time of this filing, the
46 applications shall include:
2
1 (1) A propeliy survey by a registered surveyor;
2 (2) All aflfllieatiells fer a re:IC811illg shall Be aeeompaIliecl By a ~map which
3 reflects all properties and a cOlTesponding list of the names of all propeliy owners within
4 a five hundred (500) foot radius of the subject property. A notarized affidavit shall be
5 presented to the Planning and Zoning Department within five (5) business days of
6 submittal of an accepted application, attesting under oath that the applicant gave notice of
7 the proposed application to all the property owners within the noted five hundred (500)
8 foot radius by regular U.S. mail with the exception of the abutting, or contiguous,
9 property owners, who shall be made aware via Certified Mail. The affidavit shall be
10 accompanied by a copy of the notification letter together with copies of the Certified Mail
11 receipts or the method of proof provided by the US Postal Service bulk proof of delivery
12 servIce.
13 (3) Three (3) sets of mailing labels containing the name and address of all
14 property owners of record, as reflected on the Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser's
15 tax roll as updated, within a five hundred (500) foot radius of the propeliy which is
16 subject to public hearing. The applicant shall also provide a swom affidavit attesting to
17 the validity or the mailing lists;
18 (4) A site plan showing the proposed project and all required yard setbacks and
19 other requirements; and
20 (5) The appropriate filing fee.
21 (6) (a) Transportation impact analysis, will be required for all applications
22 consisting of more than twenty-five (25) residential units, or more than 10,000 sq. ft. of
23 commercial space, unless the applicant secures a waiver as provided below. The
24 transportation impact analysis may be required to determine. among other things and
25 without limitation. the transportation impacts that a project will create, with a traffic
26 methodology approved by the Director, and wavs to mitigate both the number of vehicle
27 trips and the vehicle miles travelled to and from the project proposed in the application
28 including drawings of such mitigation proposals when required by the Director. The
29 analysis shall he discussed with the Director or designee at the Pre-Application
30 Conference, and a Memorandunl of Understanding shall be entered into which defines
31 the methodologv and parameters of the transportation impact analysis.
32 (b) The Director may require a transpOliation impact analysis for applications
33 consisting ofless than the thresholds set forth in subsection (6)(a) above, ifhe determines
34 in his sole discretion that the application presents the possible introduction of roadway or
35 transportation impacts that justify such an analysis as part of the application process.
36 Alternatively. the Director may waive the requirement of a transportation impact analysis
37 if an application proposes a project generating less than 75 vehicle trips per day, or he
38 . determines that any roadway or transportation impacts could be resolved during
39 concurrency review, or will produce deminimus impact.
40 (c) The City Commission, Planning Board, City Manager or designee. shall
41 have the same authority as the Director to require a transportation impact analysis when
42 an application is presented to them for review.
43 (d) The Planning and Zoning Department shall prepare a set of guidelines for
44 the preparation of transportation impact analyses dealing with all modes of transportation.
45 Trip generation rates shall be taken from professionally recognized sources.
3
TraJIsportation impact analyses shall be conducted purSUaJIt to the following guidelines,
unless modified bv the Planning Director or designee for good cause'
Scale Number of Daily Trips Scope of Study
Small 75 -150 .5 mile radius
Intermediate 151-500 1.0 mile radius
Large 501-1000 1.5 mile radius
Major 1001 aJId up 2.0 mile radius
(C) Planl1lng Board Notice ReqUIrements. Upon receipt of a complete applIcatIOn,
the lmilciing Planning and :lZoning ciDepartment shall prepare a Notice of Public Hearing
and a location map of the subject propelty. At least ten (lO) calendar days prior to the
scheduled public hearing by the pElanning Bboard on the application, the bwlciing
Planning and :lZoning dDepartment shall:
(I) Mail a copy of the public hearing notice and location map to all propcliy
owners within a five hundred-foot radius ofthe subject property;
(2) Post a sign on the subject property which identifies the nature of the pending
application, time of scheduled hearing and telephone number for further information;
(3) Place a legal notice in a newspaper of general circulation in the City which
notifies the public of the scheduled hearing date, location of subject property and nature
of application request; and
(4) NotifY the applicant of the scheduled public hearing date before the pElanning
board.
(D) Plal1l1ing Board Staff Report. A staff report shall be prepared by the building
pElanning and :lZoning dDepaJiment prior to the scheduled plaJming-PElaJming board
public heaJ'ing which includes its findings of fact relating to the application and a
statement as to the compliance of the application with this Code.
(E) Plal1l1ing Board Public Hearing. The applicant or applicant's representative
shall appear at the scheduled pElaJming board public hearing and verbally present the
application request. After presentation of the staff report and an opportunity for input
and comments on the application by the public present, the ~board shall make a
recommendation to approve, deny or modifY the application and traJIsmit said
recommendation to the "City ,,~ommission, except that if the Bboard determines it needs
additional information in order to make its recommendation, it may defer or continue the
item to a future time at the SaJl1e meeting, or the next regularly scheduled or special
meeting, subject to specifically identifving the required information and the requirements
of section 20-6.1 (B)(4). A deferral or continuaJlce until the next meeting for the pumose
of obtaining additional information as described above shall extend the 45-day limitation
under section 20-6.1CB)(4)(a)(iii) to allow such information to be obtained and presented
to the Board at the next available meeting, and a decision or recommendation to be made
at that next meeting.
(F) City Commission Staff Report. After the pElanning b~oard public hearing, the
building Planning and :lZoning dDepartment shall prepare a revised staff report for the
"City "Commission which incorporates the ~board's recommendation, minutes of the
public hearing and any adjustments or changes to its initial report that it deems
4
1 appropriate as a result of testimony presented during the j3£lanning b!?oard public
2 hearing.
3 (G) Commission Meeting Notice Requirements. At least ten (10) calendar days
4 prior to the scheduled public hearing by the e~ity e~ommission on 111e application, the
5 e~ity eClerk shall:
6 (I) Mail a copy of the hearing notice and map to all property owners within a five
7 hundred-foot radius of the subject property in the application;
8 (2) Post a sign on the subject propeliy clearly visible from each roadway that
9 abuts the property. The sign must identify the nature of the pending application, date and
10 time of ilie scheduled public hearing and telephone number of the Planning and Zoning
11 Department for fi.u'1her information;
12 (3) Place a legal notice in a newspaper of general circulation in the City that
13 notifies the public of the date, time and location of the scheduled hearing, and the
14 location of the subject property and nature of application req uest; and
15 (4) Notify the applicant of the date, time and location of the scheduled public
16 hearing before the eCity eCommission.
17 (H) City Commission Public Hearing. The applicant shall appear at the scheduled
18 public hearing before the e~ity eCommission and verbally present the application
19 request. After ilie public hearing, the e~ity e~ommission shall approve, deny or modify
20 the application, except that if the Commission determines it needs additional information
21 in order to make a decision on the application, it may defer or continue the item to a
22 future time or meeting.
23
24 Section 3, Section 20-5.6, "Applications in general," of the Land Development Code,
25 City of Souili Miami, Florida, is hereby amended and shall read as follows:
26
27 20-5.6 -Applications in general.
28 (A) General Requirements. All applications shall be submitted and processed
29 pursuant to the requirements of this Code and shall be submitted by the
30 owner of the property or an authorized agent of such owner on application
31 forms available in the Plall11ing and Zoning Department dej3artment ef
32 building and zen±ng. The dDirector may require reasonable proof of
33 agency from any agent.
34
35
* * "
36 Section 4. Codification. The provisions of iliis ordinance shall become and be made
37 part of ilie Land Development Code of ilie City of Souili Miami, as amended.
38
39 Section 5. Severability. If any section, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance
40 is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, this
41 holding shall not affect ilie validity of the remaining portions of iliis ordinance or ilie
42 Guidelines adopted hereunder.
43
5
1 Section 6. Ordinances in Conflict. All ordinances or parts of ordinances and all
2 sections and parts of sections of ordinances in direct conflict herewith are hereby
3 repealed.
4
5 Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective upon enactment.
6
7 PASSED AND ENACTED this __ day of _____ , 2016.
8
9 ATTEST:
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
CITY CLERK
1st Reading
2nd Reading
READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM:
LANGUAGE, LEGALITY AND
EXECUTION THEREOF
22 CITY ATTORNEY
23
24 Rev. 3-31-2016
APPROVED:
MAYOR
COMMISSION VOTE:
Mayor Stoddard:
Vice Mayor Welsh:
Commissioner Edmond:
Commissioner Harris:
Commissioner Liebman:
6
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
PLANNING BOARD
Regular Meeting Minutes Excerpt
Wednesday, May 10, 2016
CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS
07:00 P.M.
The City of South Miami Code of Ordinances, Section 8A·5, requires that all lobbyists, as defined in that section,
must register with the City Clerk before engaging in any lobbying activities and in most cases pay an annual fee oj
$500.00 and an additional $100 for each additional issue. This applies persons who are retained with or
without compensation to influence any action, decision, with the city, including the
city manager, city attorney, department heads, city personnel, or of the city commission or members oj
any city board, concerning a matter that could foreseeably be city commission or a city board. There
are some exceptions and exemptions. The following are be lobbyist: a representative of a
principal at a quasi·judicial hearing, experts who present information at public meetings,
representatives of a neighborhood association of a not-for·profit
community based organization for the purpose . influence without special
compensation.
Individuals who wish to view or
meeting can be found on the city's
I. Call to Order
Action: Mr.
II. Roll Call
City Staff
Director), Mr.
Attorney).
City Staff Absent:
City Attorney: Mr. Thomas Pepe
III. Administrative Matters
'r<i,nn< of the
(Chairman), Ms. Fischer (Vice·
Kamali (Deputy City Manager), Mrs. Jane Tompkins (Planning
Spr.ior Planner/Zoning Administrator), and Gary M. Held (Land Use
Ms. Kamali introduced the Board to Jane Tompkins, the new planning director for the city. Mrs.
Tompkins then gave a brief presentation on her qualifications.
1
Ms. Kamali informed the Board that the applicant for PB-16-005 has requested to pull their item
and to have it appear before the Planning Board at their next meeting. Because of that, PB-16-005
was not reviewed by the Board.
IV. Public Hearings
1. PB-16-013
Applicant: City of South Miami
An Ordinance amending Section 20-5.4, "Complete applications required," Section 20-5.5,
"Applications requiring public hearings," and Section 20-5.6, "Applications in general," of the
South Miami Land Development Code to establish requi'd!!:I1\ents for a traffic impact analysis,
and other changes including correction of names,;;:ril~rHying notice requirements, and
establishing authority to defer an item. .;i','
Dr. Philips read the item into the record. ,-;
... d~&~:i~:!:~.:;~ -.'::'
Mrs. Tompkins presented the PB-16-013 t6\th~·Board. \}~~, ,~.
Mr. Held informed the Board that this iterrl''ZW~!; previoy~ly.reviewed
substantial changes, it was rECferred back to tb~f!1. for;):i:!'view. Mr. Hpllrl.,thp'n explained the
changes that were made to the nrPIl0s,ed ordinance{ :I
'<'::::::::::::::0'
Mr. Greiner stated that projects t~~tdci\~~~~uf;.e less th:~h~ffty (50) trips will not require a public
hearing. He then aske,,~ifthose trip~y..ere P~~kj~~ll.i!y, or tot;j.~~(: Philips stated that it is defined
in the proposed \?(i1.fQ~nc~. ,Mr. Held ad~ed thaUtJ§:fifty (50) aai)ytrips
(~;~~-~:-""---'--"'*z~~:}/,~::;_ _ , _"':>/',.-_)'::~:::;:t(:'~{>':>-"-'; <L::':(~::::~>::::<~
Ms. Glavey as~~~;:,,:,,here th~,jt)~mber fifty~f~pr came frorYI·\"Mr. Held responded that it came
about via interna:l1dj~cussionsiMiith staff anil\~Onsultants.
""~~l\L _ _ <~;:~\i:'3r_, _____ ,_ __co":_:'
done for
th~t;;~~il'~;~f;~f~;i~~:,:trn~~6},traffic impact from residential units, a multi-
. (v.i~1);t reach th~'(:lf.dii1Y trips requirement until it has at least 20-25 '-'.%"-.'.', __ '. ,. -_'_:c' tl\~g:pr9inance isgoing to require a traffic impact analysis for lot of h~;U~~0~ignificant impact to traffic, which is a significant impact to
Bo~t.ith clarification on how the City will require the traffic
dded that based on the proposed ordinance, a project with 20-25
square feet of retail will require that traffic impact study be
urant uses that would occupy the retail space. Last Mr. Greiner
inance is quite a bit more judicious in terms of minimum thresholds
the study.
Dr. Philips asked what concurrency was. Mr. Held gave an explanation as to what concurrency
was. Dr. Philips then asked how concurrency would be met in the areas that are deficient for a
project. Mr. Held stated that some form of mitigation would have to be introduced into the
project so that concurrency can be met.
Mr. Greiner suggested that the retail square footage that triggers a traffic study be increased to
10,000 square feet. He then suggested the following language:
2
"25 residential units or 10,000 square feet of commercial space" and an
additional requirement that "unless the applicant can show that they are above
the threshold on those two it generates less than 50-70 trips per day."
Ms. Fischer asked how a project could mitigate the traffic when the roadway is considered to be
a Level of Service (LOS) F. She then stated that better criteria for LOS are needed. Mr. Basu
stated that this ordinance does not address LOS standards. The ordinance only sets up the
requirement that a traffic study be done based on the size of a development. Ms. Glavey then
explained the purpose of a traffic impact analysis. She then added that LOS is on the way out.
Ms. Glavey suggested changing the analysis to a
addresses all modes of transportation. Mr. Greiner dU.'~"\!:'''
impact analysis so that it
the amount of trips should be
clarified to be fifty (50) vehicle trips.
Mr. Held suggested the following language in
"Transportation impact nnniv'<i,
of more than 25 residential
Ms. Glavey asked if the amo
yes. It was increased to 75.
iJp/~li{:ati<)ns consisting
corn./filerc:ial space, or
from 50, of Mr. Held stated
district, of which Mr. Greiner
dilit:rict are not required to meet
7'.~"<-,, transportation issues within the
lme,nts on PB-16-013.
approve PB-16-013 with the following amendments:
to "transportation" throughout the document so that it is a
lysis that considers all modes; and
2. The thresholds for requiring a transportation impact analysis be changed to 25 residential
units or more, 10,000 square feet of commercial development or more unless the applicant
can show that they are generating less than 75 total vehicle trips in a daily count.
Mr. Held stated that pursuant to Section 20-6.1(B)(4)(a)(iii) of the LDC, the Board would have
forty (45) days to review an item. Because the Board only meets once a month, any
continuance of an item would need to come back to them at the following meeting.
Motion: Mr. Greiner moved to amend his original motion to add the comments provided by Mr.
Held regarding an additional thirty (30) days. The motion was seconded by Mr. Basu.
3
V.
VI.
Vote: Yes 6, No 1 (Fischer)
Mr. Basu: Yes
Ms. Glavey: Yes
Mr. Greiner: Yes
Ms. Fischer: No
Ms. Kahn: Yes
Dr. Philips: Yes
Mr. Melow: Yes
Mr. Greiner called for a vote on the original motion that
with the amendment.
Vote: Yes 5, No 2 (Glavey, Fischer)
Mr. Basu: Yes
Ms. Glavey: No
Mr. Greiner: Yes
Ms. Fischer: No
Ms. Kahn: Yes
Dr. Philips: Yes
Mr. Melow: Yes
Public Comments/New Business
·nr,o<pnt.,rl and Dr. Philips seconded
\ ,_, --:O::::--:<s>
, '_ ,<.",_ ',_ ',::-,:: : __ -_' >;t:::~
The Chairperson 0pi!!li!dJheJlpor to publiccommi!nt~ and any new business.
--~"~ ?,-
Public Comment;;g~~tion -<\
'i~
The Chairperscl~~l:losed the f~9r to public comments and any new business. ""< Y,'-"_ ",~ __ ",
1. Planning Board Minutes of April 12, 2016:
Motion: Ms. Fischer moved to defer the meeting minutes as amended. Mr. Greiner seconded
the motion.
Vote: Yes 7, No 0 (None)
Mr. Basu: Yes
Ms. Glavey: Yes
Mr. Greiner: Yes
Ms. Fischer: Yes
4
Ms. Kahn: Yes
.Dr. Philips: Yes
Mr. Melow: Yes
VII. Future Meeting Date:
A) June 14, 2016 at 7:00 P.M.
VIII. Adjournment
Mr. Greiner adjourned the meeting at 10:36 P.M.
5