Loading...
5700-5794 SW 76 TERR EB-87-001 g > 4,)n PALM PLAZA APTS 00 Lr) 57 9 1 (A U� 0 4b� 58 38 582a- 58,11', S.W. 74 TEMLT"(D": A L C A —57 T 07 u 0 5, 1 1 �o:8) TPAC I 4 2 5C 0 i t ns F 9 0 2 7 all 7 ilf zs 7.1—.�7 Sli At-f.11. -"36-'59-'O'�016 oo I '9 36-059-001!016 7505 511 751m FIELD ELD ViLL IELD VILL a A 13 Em 4" 7 j05 _79,10 51) 7516 5 65 5 211 ().�, laid- 14 R 59/4F S S E R 03 1. 71 25 5' 7-532 3-� 71 o 4 4 55 15 7550 5851 5841 75{� @�7 586.�-: 0 50 04 4 57K 577? 5,747, 58�,4 S.W. 76 T RR' 57115 S -o,j 5774 ';744 7 6--,,j .5 2!� 5 a '7- 4 4 76 RR' 57 . I 09 j5774 1744 4 5+1 03.1 X02 Ol 4 z z 5789 y, 5K.j l�33� 5827 51,11, 5751 57�,�5 5701 5i^- iY �SW. 77 TERR. 5840 5-E:*, 5 7 5764 l'52 5740 5—c -�7j- -7r")15 •5s:5,- 4 3- E`4 14 1 27 26 25 24 23 2� 22 iry lo 5(1 '07.1 p7 m L-s L-18 S.W.,;78 ST. i!! -71 7801 70101 12 7*81 1, G 7 GO I 0 0 - 2 7*a2i-j 4"c Cl Ia Izo 7R-D1 II 10 7 L,21) X 03 G 7�a51 78G 3 78 7831 R 70, 56 09 r MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Planning Board Held, pursuant to due notice, in Commission Chamber South Miami, Florida Tuesday, February 10, 1987 Presiding: Edward Coburn Secretary: Doris Bonilla A. The meeting was called to order at 7:50 p.m. and was followed by the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag of the United States of America. B. Present (constituting a quorum) Edward Coburn Christopher Cooke-Yarborough Thomas Cooper Bruce Hoffman Richard Prentiss In attendance: John Dellagloria, City Attorney, Mark Balkovek, Acting Director, Building, Zoning b Community . Development, Danilo Lopez, Temporary Planner C. Public Hearing PB/87-001 - Sara Park Subdivision to discuss the approval and final plat map. The presentation was made by Jim Hinds, owner, Osvaldo Landera, project architect, and Jim Beadman, land surveyor. Jim Beadman presented the plat as a subdivision of a previously unsub- divided piece of land, subdivided into nine lots, which meets all the appropriate City ordinances, and is located fronting on 58th Avenue with a new minor cul-de-sac street created within the subdivision, 16th Terrace, approximately between 80th Street and Sunset. The City has reviewed it and it seems to meet all requirements. The tentative plat has been approved by the County. After City approval, the final plat will be reviewed by the County for final approval and recordation. Staff's recommendation is to approve as submitted. A letter was pre- _7z�=sented-from:Carr-:Smith & Associates r—Anc:;.City-engine ere;who'-reviewed ---- for conformity of the final plat map meeting certain requirements of Chapter 28 of the Metropolitan Dade County Code. Carr Smith states the the final plat appears to conform with the items marked. This proposal meets zoning standards for density and setback requirements and meets the criteria of the Code. The public hearing was declared open and the following people requested to address the Board on the subject: Planning Board Meeting - 2 - February 10, 1987 1. W. E. Gilchrist, 7610 S. W. 58 Avenue Mr. Gilchrist lives directly across the street from this project and disapproves of a cul-de-sac which will increase the traffic flow of 58th Avenue and also 76th Street which is a dead end coming into 58th Avenue. It will mean about two vehicles to each home or approxi- mately 18 more vehicles, not including vehicles coming in for service, garbage, trash, laundry, etc. He doesn't believe there has been a traffic survey made on 58th Avenue for approximately three years. In 1982 the Planning Board approved a project of the previous owner, Flavio Developing Company, involving a cul-de-sac which was refused by the Planning Board on February 15, 1982. Another plot was for 10 residences with 4 homes on 58th Avenue, and 6 off of 57th Court. The Planning Board approved this resubmission, and it was sent to the Council who approved it 5-0. The City Attorney told him that dedication was void. The engineer for the County stated it is still a matter of record as a thoroughfare. Ordinance 1510 states it was void. How can it be voided and given back to the Messer property owners without a public hearing. On the plot book of the County it shows a 50 foot right-of-way is dedicated. Mr. Gilchrist submitted documentation to show it was dedicated after the ordinance of 1960 and recorded with the County in 1961, later than the Ordinance. It was approved there would be no sidewalks on 58th Avenue or around the cul-de-sac as re- corded in the minutes. Why did the Planning Board and the Council approve this plot at that time and why does the City Attorney tell him that this recorded with the County does not override the Ordinance. Mr. Gilchrist requests evidence of a public hearing where that was given back to the Messer people. No right to start building should be given until this is cleared up. The property owners are not against the nine houses but not with a cul-de-sac. Mr. Hinds went to Mayor, City Attorney, and Council and things have not taken place before. Why on January 20th should the City Council want to hold a special meeting to go over the Planning Board's head? Mr. Prentiss summarized Mr. Gilchrist's primary concern as being traffic, and Mr. Gilchrist added safety. Mr. Coburn summarized _ r___ that Mr. Gilchrist fee_ is there is some cloud or doubt over this plat •because of aprevious plat.^Mr.�Gilchriet­concuried,'and _he further —_ believes 57th Court is still dedicated, though the City Attorney says it is not. It was registered and plotted in Book 74, page 94 and approved, according to Mr. Gilchrist. 2. Cesar Armstrong, 7640 S. W. 58 Avenue He did not receive a notice of the meeting and heard about it from neighbors. The Building, Planning & Community Development Department sent out notices from the plat book to those within 300 feet. Mr. Armstrong's main concern is for the children's safety, and he wants to split the burden of traffic between 58th Avenue and 57th Court. He requested disapproval of this plan because he feels it is unfair, dangerous and inequitable. Planning Board Meeting - 3 - February 10, 1987 Mr. Armstrong submitted three letters from other residents who could not be present which were submitted as Collective Exhibit 1 to the Minutes. a. Mrs. G. Walker, 7630 S. W. 58 Avenue In favor of building but not access to 58th Avenue. b. Phillip W. Levin, 5841 S. W. 76 Street Totally against cul-de-sac because of extreme traffic problem. c. Samuel C. Snedaker, 7549 S. W. 58 Avenue Strongly objects to the proposed access off of S. W. 58th Avenue for two reasons: (1) already too much traffic; (2) safety of small children. They have had a personal tragedy of a family member. " 3. Hanna Messer, 7530 S. W. 57th Court She was speaking for the project. She discovered after her husband's death that 57th Court belongs to her. They paved it and maintained it. Mrs. Messer read a letter from Samuel A. Mutch dated November 4, 1986 and presented other documentation as follows: a. Copy of Ordinance No. 450 dated September 20, 1960, recorded in Book 2279, Page 213 b. Statement dated September 24, 1947 from E. E. Collins Contract- ing Company which is marked paid. c. Survey dated June 6, 1972 of Lot 3, Messer Manor, recorded in Plat Book 71 at Page 94 prepared by Hal Schuler b Son, Inc. d. Location Sketch The above items are entered as Collective Exhibit 2 to these Minutes. 4. Marvin Shapiro, 7521 S. W. 58 Avenue Mr. Shapiro referred to the traffic problem and children's safety and spoke against approval of the project. Chairman Coburn stated that approval of a plat is basically automatic if the plat complies with all requirements of local zoning, all Dade County codes as far as easements, streets, etc. , and there really isn't much the Planning Board can do. So far as traffic is concerned, this is an on-going problem everywhere. You can ask for Police assistance, plant plants and bushes, have fences, etc. The Board has to look strictly from a legal standpoint, not at the emotional. Bring appeals also to the City Commission. Planning Board Meeting - 4 - February 10, 1987 Mr. Armstrong asked if they are not required to bring forth studies of the traffic situation and what effect it will have. The answer from Chairman Coburn was no, only comply with the codes, the size of the lots, the frontage, the utility easements, the streets, etc. Mr. Armstrong disputes that the land belongs to a particular person, but Chairman Coburn stated that the evidence before them shows that it belongs to Mrs. Messer. If the residents wish to dispute it, the courts are the avenue. Mr. Hoffman stated that he would like to hear from the City Attorney and the Planning Department on the legal ramifications, restrictions, etc. 5. Betty Kiwalchuck, 7510 S. W. 57th Court 58th is a thoroughfare while 57th Court is not designed for traffic. The problem on 58th would be nothing compared to the problem it would be for 57th Court. Staff confirmed the requirement of a 75 foot frontage at the point of the 25 foot setback. 6. Claudia Hauri, 5752 S. W. 77 Terrace She has been a resident of South Miami since 1971 and remembers a previous hearing on this plot plan where it was approved by this Board and also questioned if at that time it was approved, why now are we going through another approval without a public hearing. She reaffirmed that a four way stop at 77th Terrace and 58th Avenue has been requested for a number of years. She is opposed to the approval of the request, due to increase of traffic on 58th Avenue. Chairman Coburn responded that this is a public hearing and that it is a replatting and the previous one was never acted upon. Staff stated that the previous submittal was a tentative plat map and had not been recorded. 7. Linda Jarvis, 7620 S. W. 58 Avenue She is the mother of three children and the cul-de-sac will empty into her front yard. She stated a great many children live on 58th Avenue. 8. Clara Hauri, 7532 S. W. 58 Avenue She stated that she sometimes has to wait for six to eight cars to get out of her driveway even at 10:00 a.m. and is opposed to increased traffic. 9. Virginia O'Malley, 7533 S. W. 58 Avenue She had two questions. Is there any possibility that the City or the developers would buy Mrs. Messer's road? If they make the cul- de-sac, they don't have to put in sidewalks? She stated that the sidewalks were really needed. Planning Board Meeting - 5 - February. 10, 1987 Chairman Coburn commented that it has been the custom not to put in sidewalks to try to keep the City on a more rural situation and not require sidewalks in strictly residential streets. Commercial buildings are required to put in sidewalks. The public hearing was closed and opened for executive session. The City Attorney restated that it is entirely irrelevant as to the ownership of 57th Court as they discussed the plat as it sits before them. Any dedicationof a thoroughfare must be accepted by a munici- pality, either formally or informally. Apparently in 1960 the City accepted and then unaccepted the dedication. The Ordinance indicates the City did not accept the dedication. If the County map indicates that the City did accept the dedication, he does not believe that will stop the City's ordinance. He must assume that in 1960 it was adopted pursuant to all correct procedures. The City could infor- mally accept the dedication several ways, most obvious would be the maintenance of the property. Staff has indicated to him that the City does not maintain that. This Board has the discretion to accept or reject the plat presented to it. The purpose of the public hearing is to present testimony to present evidence of reasons for and against it. It is not simply the will of the people. Yes, you do have authority to disapprove. You must have reason for doing so. Mr. Hoffman wanted to know if the Board has discretion to ask for traffic studies to see whether or not the Board would want to approve at a later date or must the determination be made now. City Attorney said it would be his opinion that the Board can. Motion: Richard Prentiss moved that the Board accept the revised plot plan as presented. Seconded by Thomas Cooper Discussion followed. Mr. Hoffman questioned who determines-what type of street is put in. Staff responded by stating that this was discussed at some length with the City Engineer. A cul-de-sac is a minor street with only one outlet terminating in one end with a turn around. A collector street is a street which carries traffic from minor streets to arterial streets including the principal entrance streets of a residential development and streets for circulation within such development. The cul-de-sac is a minor street.while 58th Avenue is a collector street feeding into an arterial. The engineer stated that a develop- ment of this size and scope would not require, in standard practice, a traffic study. The biggest conflict here are people taking short Planning Board Meeting - 6 - February 10, 1987 cuts off of Red Road. It is suggested that the traffic and circula- tion problem is brought forth to the City Commission. This develop- ment is not going to significantly impact this collector street. Developers are developing within all requirements, all guidelines, spent many hours with staff in preconference, gone before the Environmental Review Preservation Board, and even submitted a non- required landscape plan. The City Engineer has indicated to Staff that you could go either way with the cul-de-sac but on 57th Court there would be greater impact because that is a minor street and driveway to start with, whereas 58th is a collector feeding onto arterials. Another point is that property is adjacent to the RO zone and if you opened up 58th Court more, they would be impacted even more with the intrusion of RO overflow. Staff's position is to recommend approval. In this instance, a cul-de-sac designed minor street entering into a collector street is highly preferable. Vote: Cooke-Yarborough, yea; Cooper, yea; Prentiss, yea, Hoffman, nay; and Chairman Coburn, yea. The plat was approved. It will go before the City Commission on Tuesday, February 17, along with exhibits and minutes. D. General Discussion 1. Approval of Minutes of January 13, 1987. Motion: Richard Prentiss moved to accept the Minutes of January 13, 1987. Seconded by Christopher Cooke-Yarborough There was a question regarding the transcript of the Minutes of November 25, 1986, from Mr. Mandelstam who has called for the transcript to be prepared and a copy to be received .by the City, as reported by the City Attorney, John Dellagloria. It was suggested that a second recording machine be acquired -or the current--system-be-upgraded. Discussion also followed on Planning Board vacancies. Larry Ligammare is expected in March but is still to be approved by the City Commission. Another person is also being considered for the other vacancy. The Minutes of January 13, 1987 were approve&-unanimously. 2. Remarks: The next meeting will have two public hearings, one on South Miami Hospital and the other will be Orr's Pond. Orr's Pond is basically approved and they will be submitting the instrument for recording individual homesites. Planning Board Meeting - 7 - February 10, 1987 It was requested that a copy of the information be included in the packet to have proper time to review. Staff will attempt to have it to them by Thursday evening, but no later than Saturday morning. E. Adjournment Mr. Prentiss moved that the meeting be adjourned at 9:20 p.m. , and it was seconded by Thomas Cooper and unanimously approved. Secretary Chairman Of SOUM MUMI (� Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida 33143 6675691 November 4, 1986 Mrs. Nanny Messner 7530 S.W. 57th Court South Miami , Florida 33143 Re: Right of Way, Sy, 57t11 Court Dear Mrs. Messner: Per our conversation today, you are correct that the City of South Miami did relinquish the right-of-way described in Ordinance 450 of the City of South Miami, dated September 20, 1960. The City Of South Miami will take steps to have the map of the City and the appropriate quarter section maps reflect this in the future. Your question concerning the ability of the property immediately South of your property to gain access to S.W. 57th Court is appropriate. The property in question is in the process of being subdivided. No legal access may be given to S.W. 57th Court through your property. 'rhe design of the proposed subdivision has a cul-de-sac serving the property from S.W. 58th Avenue. �- Please lot us know if we can be of any further service to you. Sincerely, City of South Miami SM:nb Collective Exhibit .1 "City of Pleasant Living" w ' L c• Fohrijary 12. 19N1 ►'r . ' Ark Ralknvek Acting «irector Rui l Minn, Toning A Community Irv,lopmpnt. 0ppar tr pnt City of South Miami 61V Si►nset Drive Snot h tli ami , FL 33143 Re: Sara Plat f.SA Project No. 85010-11 PnAr f'ark: Pursuant to your request, Carr Smith and Associates, Inc.. has rpvia-red the subject Plat. The results of our review of the technical aspocts of the plat were contained in the February 6, 1987 letter siynpd by Lar.aro Alonso. This letter addresses your question about traffic study requirements associated with the submittal of a plat for Final Approval . Specifically, this letter will address two issues: (1 ) whether a traffic study is required under the City of South Miami Zoning Code; and, (2) whether the development, in our ,judgement. can reasonAhly be expected to significantly increase the vehicular in the vicinity of the development, and specifically. 58th Avenue. --it—is our understandln that the ' g project s to consist of nine single family residential ►snits and that the project will be consistent with existing zoning requirements and the City 's Comprehensive Master Plan. Article X11 of the South Miami Zoning Code establishes the purpose. ONPrtives, duties, a►lthority, organization and procedures of the Planning Roard. Nowhwere in the Article is the matter of plat approvAl sPecifically addressed; and as such. no requirement is estah- lisher+ whprehy a traffic study -is required in connection with the suhrnittal of A plat. r 1•; !'r. 'tArk Ralkovek Acting nirector Ruilding, Toning, b Comfy nity 1'evelopnent DepArtment Fehruary 12, 1987 PagA ?. In(in Ad, wo? believe that, given that the development is to be constrtictod in accordance with Zoning regulations and the Com- prehensivo Plan, And not under a variance or a P0, the Zoning Code does not rAquire that a traffic study be undertaken in connection with the tiihnittal of the plat. Tiro rtnvnlopment will have some impact on the vehicular traffic in the vicinity of the development. It is understood that the greatest con- cern is fnr increased traffic on S. W. 58th Avenue. S. W. 58th Avenue is a through street used by residents of the immediate area and by nt!!rrs as an alternative to Red Road. Thus, traffic on that avenue is greAter than which one would normrlly expect on a residential road. The! Additional traffic from nine residential units could not be expArtod to significantly increase traffic on nearby streets. Ths± 7oning rode used in our analysis was last revised April 18, 1985. Any chanq-�s made since that date, could of course, effect our conclu- sions. nur analysis was based on the Zoning Code, and did not include the City Code or the City Charter. Yory truly yours, CARP SHIT 11 AND ASSOCIATES, INC. C. T. Derr, P.F. Chief Engineer Uri/is/:)24 6130 Sunset Driv(?, South Miami, Florida 33143 667-6691 A G E N D A ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND PRESERVATION BOARD JANUARY 6, 1987 9:00 A.M. A. Call to order. B. Roll call. C. Approval Requests. �a. EB/87-003. Request final approval to convert garage & utility rom into a bedroom & bathroom. Applicant: C.M. Hauri Address: 5752 S.W. 77 ter. Represented by: same (owner) . b. EB/87-001. Request final approval to install illuminated channel letters. Applicant: Plaza Bank Address: 6183 Sunset Drive. Represented by: Jerome Bengis c. EB/87-002• Request final approval to change signage Applicant: Flagler Federal Adrress: 5755 Sunset Frive. / Represented by: Acolite EB/87-004. Request final approval to renovate storefront. Applicant: Sam Taha Address: 7250 RF:d Road. Represented by: Diaz Glass e. EB/87-005. Request preliminary approval of a second floor addition to Outpatient Surgery Center. Applicant: South Miami Hospital Address: 7400 S.W. 62 Ave. Represented by: Bill Enright f. EB/87-006. Request final approval for 6 level Parking garage. Applicant: South Miami Hospital Address: 7400 S.W. 62 Ave. Represented by: Tom Resnick EB/87-007. Request final approval for Radiation/Oncology addition j9- n to South Miami Hospital. Applicant: South Miami Hospital Address: 7400 S.W. 62 Ave. Represented by: Tom Resnick h. EB/87-008. Request final approval of a residential development, re-plat. Applicant: Len-Jac Corporation Address: S.W. 58 Ave. `& 'proposed S.W.' ,76 ter. Rpresented by: Jim Hinds D. Approval of Minutes. December 16, 1987 E. Adjournment. "City of Pleasant Living" Y -.tt `• •, 1 .3.1'Nip 4 M r' 4;51 J • :^4111:. �.. • ., yr. . n i ,;' I I of South '* r h MlanO DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING Application for Approval by Environmental Review Board (E.R.P.B. ) Type or Print r. Date of Submission Date of Hearing Owner: LEN-JAC CorporatiorPhone: 445-2447 MATERIALS TO BE SUBMITTED IN TRIPLICATE Address: 366 Minorca Avenue, Coral Gables, F1 Represented by: Jim Hinds Phone: 445-2447 BUILDING INFORMATION: ❑ Plans & Drawings ❑ Enerq,y Efficiency Co, Address: 366 Minorca Avenue, Coral Gables, F1 U Site Plan Plumbing Data Landscape Plan Mechanical Data—TT.? Architect: VERGARA SKLOW Phone: 443-2933 Ist Fl Elev. , MSL 0 Truss Plan Electrical Data Other _•. Engineer: Phone: -� ZONING: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT: ©Preliminary Review ❑ Lot Size ❑ F.A.R. ❑Final Plans Lot Fronta a =:B Parkin an Setbacks - Front aces Required-- A residential development of nine(9) - Rear Com act Spaces sin le-family homes on 2.6 acres - Side Han ca a aces ` located at S.W. 58th Avenue and - Corner Lot Coverage # Stories & Height Lands'd. O en S ace proposed S.W. 76th Terrace. Bld . Elevations U New Easements _Co Tors & Materia s e scat ons Roof - oor & t a ter Estimated Cost Use of Structure ❑ Gross Floor Area 100,000.00 Improvements Residence , - 80,000.00 each Resid ❑ Commercial ❑ Sign, etc. SIGNS: / ❑ P otos 0f Site Color - Background AL 49�1" l w� President Sho Drawin s Color of lettering ApplAc nt s Si__ u eaftd Tit a C1 Dimension of Sign t e of etter ncq;` or Letters 0 `F 11 Bldg. Elevation uppoStructuren r ' Director, plann ng And on ng Showing Signs ❑ Other ACTION TAKEN BY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW BOARD / Date/of Date/of Hearing Approved as presented *Returned for Revision Remarks ' �• G/,�' ��C��r.l[-e--._ `L-t�z., I7�-C-.{� ��.-d�a<<i�rr�-yr bate Director, ,Planning and Zoning Chmn. Env ronmenta Rev i e oar SUBMISSION GUIDELINES ❑ All drawings must be specific, complete, accurate, drawn to scale and labeled C� All drawings and photos must be submitted in triplicate. ❑ Materials and colors must be specified. C3 Shading devices (roof overhangs, awnings, trees, etc. ) on southern, eastern and western exposures should be utilized. ❑ Cross ventilation in residential structures should be provided. ❑ Landscape materials, where used, must be clearly specified. ❑ Large, commercial projects should include a model . NO PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED UNTIL EXPIRATION OF 15 DAY APPEAL PERIOD FOR COMMERCIAL APPLICATIONS APPLICATION, FEE, AND ALI, OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION (e.g. PLANS, DRAWINGS, PHOTOS, ETC.) MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT NO LATER THAN 12:00 NOON, MONDAY, THE WEEK BEFORE THE SCHEDULED E.R.P.B. MEETING WHEN APPLICATION IS TO BE REVIEW 9. P-2100-90 REV. 9/12/86 t't g'rl M Valid only when bearina official machine o endorsement of cashier above. .� a ; CL LAJ 0- W l- G 1— CD �� Cr- f ' O r_y Q t C.) U i� J CL b .� •`t, a•i 1 •r � Ln V L _ U_ Z O O u v) *w ! U N O (U .— O W W 2: U LL. CrI. Q Gr . :,1�;,'�.4Rµ 'r •`r" �. •3.�•' is k ,�. .E'•� ,,# �,. 4 \ .if• J t, Y` 1 k�?q, •Ft�l• , .• Valid only when bearino official machine s • cz:) endorsement of cashier above. ri (Q Q *Z X �— to ``>�- 0.— 0 41 E' to � Y 1 lit 11 � tL 4M LLJ d ? n r ` I .jet [y tk Va 210, lot T d�°a3,r a N a"1F W � k •SID a.�. k nM. LAC 5 f i ' I I � n - r ¢� px r yaW r � YE 1 i a a + Tw OV i uhylk df � " � 1 ill y � i f cd�4111 A*'. ,. ,yTi� I I I 1 y�. by P- �,rs Af7 -�`- 1• tip Ti �',a- z,wF�x r I i t ro w `i * alloy{ ra+r+f���i 4- e m � * o f ill, )III e n !'py A 3- JPI �f t 4� "r F ; Off Ir 75"11 7,C; -7 04 z5 lD.Q'.O0 d .5-.,� ' ,5.32 b ^', 0 . .,� Y L� ._ x"33 � �•. � . .�^ • ..._ 2 " ' . • /5e BB 84'.?d 2A .2 fi�y'� trt�� �1r FVb Tic Al � 7 ...�. -n teJh>a r r�a �d l..•i ..y��l{�',fi'r"trk.p,..t.,�,p•4 Q s t� 'i.;C7�r i 4. 40 y .. Fp 7 � t4f t i � T � p{. 'rx�_'Syl'�'S� Y7p,.,,,• Yr �tpb.��'kV�k �{�, .7 � a'� S Yi�; !!!tr'VjgM}�:!' • + t i ",Ll* 8 ,r.� v� h3 2 �i� i.. 1 r{1. M iq �y 9 1 r fi t, y aid a� ......�. 1 5; {'�N #'Y t,� �1.f �n r� � �,,'w 1 'R•�kfi_(. � � Y _ 7-600 AI .. 7VP'�® '��s.} rl �, �YLv� #*Ip' ,�•�� }Ar�. ` �� -€�. lk�.,hr .�R iG�* �iy' �.7 VY.�• tr 49 57,5-/ Y,.7 p�A IVW tAo 77 lag /?."D'�� O / 5. 30 a .9 2 m • 'Tip 4 , 77V ..T w. 78 r� 0 760 AA 7 7 $� o _ , io - 3,r 30 790 1 7 c�k"y` •. y .r .�s • vfs Pfd^F.�%�?�•Sy+. •. r ��'v�'J�+"ti+� �k�`'.�� 'd���^,,t/ •,�*.�«�;7�� , NP�7 rfS e rY���r'r�'i.-.�����'1�pru�,�s��,s{�Y�,�, {Y,,4 �• i ' 1 iq'i 7A �' x's*�t'✓' dp �, ±71,`}'"dd'r ' s �i+•�,n�q� ' "ry4nJ'�'fkygl.��'"� �t.'r{ rtr]}r'4 � g�t t�s.w•,Li+F �}'.. "1,As,,,tM� ,�,� '��sF�'}1..r+ .ta� '�' • i rock", } rY„i��i`G*•��),9'F"'9'L+�y�,wr. 4S:lS. 'r�� �. '�,�l r,'da w 4�ri`•'+�,,,v�' k�SF1b^!!�' �rh' �I�(`rR,��,�, S` 'b� A.�4 Er4� 4��•+ My ro�Yi. 04rf�' uN^r,ILY ;!t r r�i! ..yy�� 4 w4� pG,�f :, !•� / +S ^tvrY'r��}7('fa?ar` C���� �' ��qq. A•f t�r , <<;. � �.e'}'p�+�1 '` i �',4 .�F' Ztr tibr ,�; � � r i +.r, ,..r...r.,1, � � 4 �{- ,r..'•+.•.w,ru.�:e.m.�w+._.... v+ 1 A}. �+15!.�♦ �«w.'w'r r:w.r .wn+ .•r.�w.r..h.•.� .Jy�:l�.w+...+,►. .ri.+iwW�Yrktyt" .Q`e hw� ljr��i.4 1 e 4q { Y1 J liV�y..rt"�k�.'r�...h�(+!.,,;a�-`r..f.�.1^.{c+. tu+Y�k:t�t";t1 r.V1°.7 1�i'}",'i,"w'►r>T l24�,r.rYV TC.`�A,y.!}'2!a.�?/r��,Y3�+,r s f'%!,}.,'�,t. �sf'tf�'"plJ J�S l''s�r.,r'�S4,.�r.J"L H 1 3 P.`t C r is"r-f ',s' �t . 'Y t-e9M`i!E�h�.Y,r a kT t A�r i S r' r k/.-1_'��r?s ry t ,.WySti,�;�,+[r,.f N'"'�,Y v 4.y,� s w`v fill, }1. :t M OF�yry�{ xbr Yy �."� ��, .�§!.^t �') 9�+�.1+��h� �1`�. '�ti�rY�' v. ` �t•� �'' fr� Y ., �a ��.v s5 ��ry� �S�JY, '`{is�`i �� y'kf- t .?il v^R.°4Yr�,'s�§" � +��4� i�,. 1�; { fi�� ,��•� r;�.• ��`�` k�W."'�t�.T�yti, ,. r+r} k�fp�r3r+°�� Y t'. 1�,{,�`r�d^�.t� t ��d , ,qi � a ��t r, ���K ,��, rl,K. �d;iy.,� �' {+'�F�Y1� �*�`""V.,,�" ,?e R��p+'�k*'"' ta,�Ct+„�l�x�y,� ij� '•1�` l�s 1,,,��'`�".� .A� ��� s+b�^'�t r'd'„�+�.7'�✓Y b '�.r}t t r �r � <A`� ,�,` rg�'��°'Fer��V,7f�"I�` y m E����� '�.'a rr� �,9 ',. _ 'i at'}it tih � s"+h' 'a4r f „t,•'F- ,*�. fr„a �rea'Jryo'� �nr+uu� .aat t a Y } �P� .�p,'1uti. r7 na a.iq, •{}t 1x,�,� d..r,F I w�'�+@ q M .#ml. .�+ � TSR {7y,� +,,:�yL .r,�y ,.rw . '.Tv''- r"ae'l�'+t,�{ dd1'++t°r�}ta. �nf�°`��,E R".P i�>•��Lr}aY�.t�;r .. �",�a���'(°'�rq�; � �JC�+ �,}J� G F. M, r�.. vrt 1`v+. .vk;}>W �� 4'4„� \ W.A'"i; ,+,•"' /, d•+ R •�`��,�•'?N;;u ,.Yy 1•G'4, SARA PARK RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Aproposed developnent of nine single-family, detached hares. Three separate �. models will be constructed providing articulated structures with spacious, open plans, designed in a subtle interaction of post-modern and traditional styles. The existing 2.6 acre tract located on S.W. 58th Avenue and proposed S.W. 76th Terrace, will be platted for nine separate lots conforming to the requiranents of RS-3 Zoning. Each lot will provide an area between 10,400 to 13,500 square feet, exceeding the minimum area of 10,000 square feet required by Zoning. Each model will provide a total gross area between 2,760 to 2,900 square feet. The proposed models conform with the allowable building area, setbacks and open space requirements of RS-3 Zoning. Improvements will include a new cul-de-sac road, drainage and utilities which conform to all applicable municipal and county requirements. Although not a requirm ent of td-e Zoning Code, each residential lot will be landscaped to provide an attractive living environment. This project will provide a high quality developrent which will be a source of pride to it's residents and to the City of South Miami. "%^� ETC 1 y• *'•.>w 4 1P'y7 a>,xtX esµ 4 M x •t4. ,jGj,, / r 05.06 25 2-,5 14 :�. 50 /54a A ,¢� a2 F I •` Are 0.' _5 914 uO, 7S-3z 194 7 06 154 BB BG a /5 o::oa Cp • �w�• ��M`��r�iYc��ar«cFv�'��'nu.w'�`l 9�r„3°*7^a.�'K�d 1 'pa . 71,6ZO ' `�+ �Paf��;S gkC.�...a ��..N��,k�'»k �� a��p i��� ">'�t � .xlfw�cr• -. �` -• �'P}r+,i�»��,h�Aatr�J.trxa..+r^tt"w.l,M�.ih#�aYis-t t,�� ,� `f� �t,���,� , ,r e �qc, aka At'S 1gy,i T z 1mu W o-•M„ • L.`C-aY-t�'Y s'�?yMC (Yakd`.,�� E '��F"" ��� •��S�W`. ...., ".�j�d�'� Vk•yap"�k.; rt4 Ra Y+�+�""' h� �+Y S a „�"�`. , �*5 7'60©' p 7 ,4 rdiHS .,'. t ,ti:• ,{+7 .ttrythy k u.. .3�D or .• �` � � tom' ,. a �..i:. 4 5•'30 7 � 2 t r 14 tt 3 2 1,36- O r 5 D ° • 25 �� O "7910 l ® ---- ./0 & o` � • • _ 3 .7 w - S.W 58 AVE I !. I li I -__-4 s +O' I I I ua }-- i IU I - I- __ I ' -------_------ / 1 I \ 1 I `f 11 �.P `•` 1 s I / I I // // \\\ I /ice \\ \ _•\\ - 1. I q••`v / I I � �\ --- -- --L-- - - -- - - - - - -- -----+ --I-J----- -- -------- --i--- I r Chu of South Miami 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida 33143 667.5691 A G E N D A PLANNING BOARD FEBRUARY 10, 1987 7:30 p.m. A. Call to order and the Pledge of Allegiance to, the flag of the United States of America. B. Roll call. C. Public Hearing No. 87-001 to discuss the approval of a final plat map of the Sara Park Subdivision, D. General Discussion 1. Approval of Minutes of January 13, 1987. 2. Remarks E. Adjournment 'a L.00NI"'ON SKETCH FAIRGLADE. MANOR LARKING FOREST (Ps45 PG ?9) (p® 33 P644) SW 74 TERR Z — ra 11 ie g 6 a CD ca q MES EIR IV ANOR PG 94T o W cc d do LU Ul SVJ 77 TERR_— 7-.F FA I R Q E AR - ---- - - r (P 4-s eo) 4 w DAVIS HIGHLAND Q VICTORIA PLACE UJ (PB 51 PG 59 ) ?U')� (P 6 51 PG 9 ) Q 1L.F._C_t-j L_ C?E `: CF? I F'T I CD r-4 The North 112 , of the N.E. 1/4 , of the S.E. 1/4 , of t. 1. ior, 6 , Town---hip 54 South , Range 40 East ; LESS thc, f4­�t -,ncl the 1,4-at 25.00 feet thereof . - w�, . fi6�W"� ' V . WJMMIPALLMNM amour Aa.,�i s.rerun iriK� �+" je. � •� I 1 tl 11 0 �IIN. 1 .. k �a k �N am 1��1� Ei•� i r � drat ..,.E�..,��'i . ��E 1111 1 a. r... . .t � fax Iwo �IAiM,I�I PAN �� 99999s�� !� '� .�� �; � �" �, �' '�' '>�.�--tea=.� .�7,t►'.,�i��t �C � �i ■� H" /}�• � r1A;/L. � '•M�,ai:+3.•Glr: b,.!G.Iri6?dt'iWP.��'�'n'.t,. err.V tp �I � 'I� Q �n ,� + �� - r' �,.. - � ;tom PJ! �� ;��■ 9 9 a�►� C�I'3i ■�1� � I 1 1 � � I •nom• � ..' 1 � ......_.— _ ----_,..�..... auuca, J. rren .._ .:M.,o.,a:,.�.�awus �tna'•r9'� yr �i t����:�i�w.� e�5°• n'pir��. .,,�' �'�"� � ., y� as 38 47 t i qL r+ h P L7� 10 Y, 19 t t Au 44G 5 57 LI �T3?e s 77g 7 7 iB 4z 43 5d S9 7a 7S E 5»r 74th 5T 1� s� b-- G 53 I _°S w 74 LARK/N R S AM R. TZR '� j�. ♦; S t �A� s � 5� '� s � s♦ 0 ;s � ;o t � fsTr9 74a 41 41 i. w 37 I A� '�, 14 ' Q0 z 7 5 3 t,4 O>ZS 7 s5 .i 9A 6 0 5r V At h •Jf �► Q A I 4 31 z S• o) b f' ti S w 77TH TAR. E(. L iY n 9 6 5 " �,A► Z r 4 3 2 / ST. SW 7 SW 78 S7 _.- - r° �a r � r h � ` 9 S w 7 h p r• r 4 �s / z : �4> 57) 3 • E � — - - ---- pal � � 3. 7 B/s • ���. S 7-. 4 ys v Tr• i3 , � 4 3 3' � � �� .• e 9 is APPLICANT: L�iW - •-l�G �/41Zf 012�'PI� OWNER: MAP REFERENCE : Compass COIM tE• NTS : d JIEa�%7-1 1►��'�OfV� p`�'✓t. . � �t�.L '�t.A.'T' � Scale . � . . . . Date . . M-7 . . . . Drri jt,4 . . .Chk . . . . . CITY o; MOM MIAMI PLANNING 50ARD Hearing Aj ORDINANCE NO. 450 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI FLORIDA, - RELINQUISHING AND REVOKING fHE RIGHT-OF-WAY OVER THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: E 25 ' of Wk of E� of $ of, S of NEk of NEk AND W 25 ft of 4 o E�: of Sk , S� of NEk of NEk in SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 54 South, RANGE 40 EAST. WHEREAS, on the 24th day of March,.. 1947, the land$ in the caption were dedicated to the City of South Miami for right-of-wayy ppurposes according to the deed recorded in Deed Book 3341 at page '420 of Pub- lic Records of Dade County, Florida. WHEREAS , the said right-of-way dedication was for the purpose of extending S. W. 57th Court, and WHEREAS by Resolution No. 1510, the City Council has a that certain subdivision known as MESSER MANOR, the same beingovad subdivision encompassing the previously mentioned dedication, and WHEREAS it appears that the dedication made by deed erroneously dedicated lands not needed for the extension of S .W. 57th Court, and WHEREAS, the subdivider of MESSER MANOR has thereby had a cloud cast upon his title to said lands , and is hereby prevented from re- cording the plat of MESSER MANOR with the Clerk of the Metropolitan Dade County Commission, and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board of the City of South Miami has recommended that the right-of-way as described in the caption hereto be revoked and relinquished. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI: 1 . That the right-of-way previously dedicated and exis in over the following described pro erty: E 25 ft of vk of Jt of S NEB of NEB; and W 25 ft of E of E of S of S of of NEB o in S of Section 36, Township 54 .South relinquished. , a..;IC3. 110 :Cast, is hereby revoked and 2 . That this Ordinance is enacted in the interest of further development of the said City, and the matters herein set forth have been approved and passed by the City after full evaluation taken of all the facts herein involved. . 3. That should any word, phrase, clause or sentence or section of this Ordinance be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect or make inoperative the remainder of this Ordinance and it is hereby declared to be the intent of this body that all parts of this Ordinance are severable. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20 day of September A.D. 19600 (signed) Paul u. Tevis ATTEST: Presiding cer, y uno Cf*1JF,1LATA•M L:iy p! (signed) C. B. Petry Ns A/� .� , 0 ftw 10i My 'Clerk 09pr 0i 4�0 a -�,+�W dated •1'• a •-- . two �►. <<r Florida, County uf U.jr. Qy4a o . 1 � i t was filed for recur.: l N. and duly tewrdcu it fOf 1(':AL Rtti:�i,DS •f„I y �.-on Page/J_ E. 0. LEA• N c H M A h Q xAKr', ��,tt � � .!���l�n;Os I r i I' •fir• •i• i IN ACCOUNT WITH � . r . �' ',� I ` 111 �' � 1� �1' �� 1� i' •1' 111 � �' �. PAVING COSIRACTOIIS •CI•�►t wp - ISCAVAII%C - Sq,•w.L•1 - CV00,666 - O•s0.4• •V1• M1/0► - 9.I\1 %1o. Ct - ♦•►i••0 Alto &A.001• .-0.! • •1•! ail• • wt. 11•0 AvCpye lieve list MIAMI 35. FLO4tOA 'FO Fcv ink :oS' on Doti, a ld ejo of S. lot AY-3. 109 . 76 To ?wvin` fob' or, bow, sldco of S . •c':4 Court KC 1gq.1S f Ci �� I 1-H,LLJP W. LE V'N 1,S41 ;.W. 76th nreet hl/&'n/, FL. 33143 of ��n � �.'��y of So���• �'� ��,M � ' d� v ► Sot1 U � C_Ye �� e eYa tM O w h;c_ r\ grove . C.) C\% �cs tryc t_V , n 29 January 1987 City of South Woml Planning Board Attention: Mark C. Balkovok 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, Florida 33143 Subject: Public Hoaring No. 87-001, Sara Park Subdivision Door Mr. Balkovok: Duo to a pond'ing trip on the dato of the hearing., Inexpressing my ` interest in the Final Plat Plan of the Sara Park Subdivision in writing.- My wifo and I very strongly OBJRCT to tho proposed access to that subdivision off of SW 681b Avenue for two reasons: (1) There is already too, too much traffic along SW 5811 Avonuo in this onco-quiet residential neighborhood. Not only is there excessive spooding, but all too frequently care voor into and cross over our front yard for a varioty of reasons which range from driver heart attacks to drivers avoiding accidents at the doodond intorsoction with SW 7611 Street. (2) The family neighborhood along SW 5816 Avenue is populated with many small children. This Snodakor family already knows tho pain, grief and sadness suffered as the result of the death of a bicycling family member caused by a momontarily-careloes driver. Clearly, any additional traffic burden on SW 68111 is rialther warranted nor Justifiable, particularly in view of the alternate access from SW 5711, Court. wo therefore strongly recommend and urgo tho donial of approval of the Final Plat Map and that access to the Sara Park Subdivision be routed through SW 57%h Court as was earlier proposed. Sincorely, Samuel C. Snedaker Copies: neighborhood residents SAMUEL C. SNEDAKER 7540 S W SETH AVENUE. SO MIAMI. FLORIpA 33143 USA 305.665.0854 - r d tA D C-7 /' S, s i• v r ri •• i � n t � t . � i C O 1 6 9 rr E stt • % O jr o= c v r ww•rr.cr.4.retY•+r�'i. .yyR�-aSYylyd{'_ _ .. _ _ _.+�„ • ....-��a...r..r...�..«rr.w...•w.«rww..,...,a.. .+..+.—+.w.w.�rr.+ry�..ww ....._.+r.-- ..�, _ - .AI,�i'YPJ•Y�','��_ L4K t �74.�� A 11 r � • ,� � a too s A r, r r Y 1 s/rcti .,,.•. �.�� tw s W ,t, f,ps •l,at Ii Z1• i � o � v in 4 o � � o , - > *4W51 AVE f m tr[ in O • 1 O 0 r o I i W cn fn I 0 A M 16 PENES KV. 2 m 07----_ .-._ •. (P8 $1 P6 5 ) P6 10 PC,18) I o N f� 1• :� • f t mow' •� . . Yp • � S.• , )•gip . • -owe oil, 1 MOM _ Chg of South Miami _ 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida 33143 667.5691 NOTICE OF 1'UIi1,1C tll��i;IhC The Planning Board of the City of South 4i1ni will conduct a public hearing No. 87-001 for the approval of a Final, flat Map of the Sara Park Subdivision on February 10, 1987. The Sera Park Subdivision has a street of S. W. 58th Avenue, proposed S. W. 76th Terrace between S. W. 7601 St rent an.l S. t4. 77th Terrace. The legal description is as follows: The North S of the N.E. IL of th0 S,F., �: .•f the N.I:. ',• of Section 36, Township 54 South, Range 40 East; less t1tt- I:a:i ,86.2() it•et nnJ 1110 hest 25.00 feet thereof, Dade County, Florida. You are hereby advised that if any person do-sires to appeal any decision made with respect to any matter considered at this nit-et In); c+r Bearing, such person will need a record of the proceedings, antl f„r ::uc.h nurllose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings Is inacip. which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the .1pne:tl Is to bc, based. Public hearing will be held in the commission chambers. at the City Nall, 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida, at. 7: 30 o.m. of the date stated above. ALL interested parties are urged to attend and objections or expressions of + approval may be made In person at the hcnrlt,& car f � tt-y �iagTptQ � - or aL t?te "liear Board"'reserves the rtf;ht to recommend to the City Commission whatever the Board considers in the best interest for the area Involved. The Board's recommendation on this matter will be heard by -tile City Comoiablon at a future date, tentatively scheduled for February 17, 1987. Interested parties requesting information are asked to contact the office of the Directc;. bf Building, Zoning b Community Development by calling 667-5691 or by writing. REFER TO HEARINC NUIMBER WHEN `CAKING INQUIRY. 1110 City of South Miami I'IanulnL board ` ark C. Italkuvck, Acting Director of Building, , 7.0111119 and Community Development Tv � �.o-�,.•..� .,cam imp.-� 'C.��--�e.��./; ., jrA �ja J r t-s COLLECTIVE EXHIBIT Z "City Of MASAN INn9" Of SOLIHI %llami South Miami , Iloi•icla 33143 PLANNING BOARD SIGN-IN SHEET OF AP LICANT PUBLIC HEARING OR CONSULTATION ell 5 Sit ip5t 4,,no 7,E6 _S w g9- �v P 533 "City of Pleasant CRU of South Miami INTER--OFFICE MEMORANDUM MjAdfo k Balkovek DATE: Feb. 6, 1987 lannin & Dir for FROM! SUBJECT! D opez Staff Report ner Sare Park Final Plat. Background" 1. A residential development of nine (9) single-family homes on 2.6 acres located at SW 58th. Avenue and proposed SW 76th. terrace. 2. General Data: Applicant: Len-Jac Corporation Address: SW 58 Av. & proposed SW 76 Terr. Represented by: Jun Hinds. 3. Located in "RS-311, low density, single-family residential district to have spacious setting and the preservation of open spaces. 4. The site plan and general architecture were approved by the Environmental Review and Preservation Board (by February 3rd 1987) . The applicant agreed to submit a complete landscape plan with special requirements for east and west solar radiation. 5. The Planning and Zoning Department recommended approval of the proposed development with respect to the Zoning Ordinances. 6. Revision of the construction drawings is in process now at the Building Official Office. 7. A public hearing (87-001) is scheduled to take place on Tuesday, February 10, 1987 before the Planning Board to discuss the plating of the property. 8. Carr Smith & Associate, City Engineers checked the conformity of the Sara Park Final Plat with certain requirement of Chapter 28 of -the Metropolitan Dade County Code (February 6, 1987). According to their report, Len-Jac Corporation has fullfilled: Drawing requirements Legal Description Survey Data Dedications ' . t 7 , t tR,If A w: `` : ra i A• The Mortgagee Approvals and the Plat Submittal Items were not checked because they are out of the scope of the Surveying Discipline Review, which they perform. 9. The Metropolitan Dade County Plat Committee issued a Notice of Action in reference to this case (November 12, 1986). The Committee approved the proposed plat subject to certain con- ditions. Len-Jac Corporation had to submit: - Paving and Drainage Plan - Bond estimate for required improvements - Final tracing plus four prints - Opinion of Title - Paid tax receipts - Processing Fee for Final Plate - Recording Fee for Final Plate - Health Department Approval (method of water supply) - Pollution Control Dept. approval (method of sewage disposal) - Letter for FP&L Co. (underground electric service) 10. The Miami-D1de Water and Sewer Authority Department, Souther. Bell Company and the .Florida Power and Light Company also stated their requirements to Len-Jac Corporation. 11, Finally, the City of South Miami, through our Building, Zoning & Community Development Department in conjuction with the City Attorney and Len-Jac Corporation's Jim Hinds, prepared an "Agree- ment for Construction of Subdivision Improvements", (Jan. 20, 1987). 12. Our City Attorney already received (Jan. 21, 1987) an Irrevocable Documentary Letter of Credit in the amount of $14,000, to cover the estimated cost of construction and maintenance of the Subdi- vision Improvements listed in the above mentioned agreement. Recommendation 1. To approve, by the Planning Board, the proposed Plat Subdivision presented by Len-Jac Corporation provided that: A. The "Agreement for Construction of Subdivision Improvements" between the City of South Miami and Len-Jac Corporation, regarding the Sara Park Residential Development, will be enforced as discussed and approved by the hereinabove mentioned parties. B. Len-Jac Corporation A-1.1, fullfil all the requirements of other governmental agencies. C. The Platting Map will be corrected in its south overall dimen- sion. (Fairglade Park) where instead of 344.10' , should indicate 349.10' . LYN � R T , K FINAL PLAT f'i';A14i')f; FE )UIRit'II;IITS: (V) IS t.hc 1-1,)Me of the subdivision shown in bold letters on each ;heet of the Plat? Entire name shall be the same size, i.e. "PRFAMWOOD, UNIT TWO" . (� I:; the gennr.al description of the platted area shown underneath tho Plat Title? i.e. Quarter - Quarter, Section, Township, Range, City, County, and State. Also .indicate if a resubdi.vision and show name of underlying plat, Plat Book and Page numbers if so. ( �) Is a Prominent "north arrow" shown and its position orientated with the bearings as shown on the subdivision drawing? (✓) is the basis of bearings stated in the Surveyor's notes? �p( ) If more than one sheet is used, is the number of that sheet and the total number of sheets shown in the upper right hand corner? (✓) Are the words "Plat Book and Page to shown inside the margin in the tipper right hand corner? (") Is the scale stated and graphically illustrated on each sheet of the subdivision plat? Are the names of streets, waterways, or other rights-of-way shown? (✓} Is the name of the Land Surveyor or firm (as applicable) responsible for preparation of the plat shown? (0 I, the date of preparation indicated? VHave street names been checked for proper designations? (VAre all lots numbered? IV-1 r' A + a . ._ 1vi .. .. ... ..„trd u. , ..nn...n.. .mow...,.............. ... ..... . ., .�."�'�.w�.I,•..�W�'�?„iMr ' —'r--:.:....�.Lw.n;awnwwa+.+M+—+.+++.—. A h I-VA. ( ) Are a1.1 tracts designated by letter? w/o- ( 1 Arc all block numbers shown? Are lot, lJock and tract designations in proper sequence when plot ic: a subsequent: section of* same name as previously recorded plat? i 1 1 contiguous properties .identified by name of subdivision with Plat Book and Page designated or labeled as "Not Subdivided" V (1/) Arc municipal and/or County boundaries indicated where applicable? (/ Is t.herc a tie shown to at least one fractional corner? (� Are all drawing symbols explained by Surveyor's Notes or Legend? 3A f, t©i ( ) Does final plat configuration conform with approved tentative? 344,iol (✓) Is !.-)cation Map shown indicating quarter-section, perimeter roads, / and suI)division7 (I/) Is Fect:icn, Township, Range, municipal boundaries, North Arrow and scale indicated for Location Map) (�1r; aL least one fractional corner identified in Location Map? LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Ts the 1%:gal description shown' and is it the same as in the Op.i.nion of Title? ,kip. ( ) none, description indicate if this plat is a replat and if so, in(lic t.e the underlying plat name and recording information? µ/P( ) Dc:cs d� sci iption indicate which lots, blocks, tracts, etc. of the underlying plat are being replatted? IV-2 "L F+'I'N 3 +E ti� (r? Does the flat boundary agree with the legal description? ( ) MAs the Opinion of Title of ownership been furnished on the �• 4•u))ject legal dr..scription by an attorney authorized to pra.7t icc in Fl cr.ida? ( ) Is the Opinion of Title signed by the attorney? � SURVEY DATA: (� 1) the distances and angles of this plat substantially agree -.,vi t.h adjoining recorded plats and County Township maps? If diffrrrencns are substantial are they clearly indicated on the plat? (✓) Has the ext:exnal boundary closure of the subdivision been run? (✓� Have Black closures been run? ( ) Have Lot c-losures been run? - (✓) Are all street right-of-way widths shown? (✓) Are all }.;Lock corner radii and the curve data shown? (� Is all street= centerline information shown including complete curve data? (V) Are all "P.C. ' s, P.T. 's, P.R.C. 's, and P.C.C. 's" shown? (:dot nr�cc,ssa.ri.ly labeled) (✓) Tire all Block and Lot dimensions with angles or bearings shown? (� Are dimensions shown to hundredths of a foot where applicable? (� Are angles and/or bearings shown in degrees, minutes, and seconds where ahhlicahle? (d( .Is curve data shown on all curvilinear Lots? /) Are all radial lines designated as such? IV-3 i i 1h � (V) 11:1ve P.R.M. 's, P.C.P. ' s been set in accordance' with Chapter 177.091, Florida Statutes? (� ',.t•c all section lines and quarter section lines with necessary tics to corners shown on the Plat and identified? ' 1; the land description by metes and bounds? If so, is the Foint f 9 cginn.ing indicated with all bearings and distances along the boundary? Bearings and distances should be shown on. the drawing in. the same order as the calls in the land description. (V) Are all }mown casc..mdnts shown on drawing and identified? (0 Are easement widths shown? (V Are easements approved by the owner? (✓) Are the easements requested by the utility companies indicated? DCDICATIONS: (✓7 Are the following items covered in the dedication: name of legal cv,ner, title of the Plat as shown on the Plat, company, officers, streets, alleys, parks, .Lakes, walkways etc. , and corporate seal if corporation"? (W Is acknowledgement for dedication signed and sealed by a notary Public? P.ORTGAGEr APPROVALS: ( ) Do all mortgagees having a record interest in the lands subdivided , show their approval of the subdivision on the Plat? ( ) is acknowledgement of mortgagee approval signed and sealed by a M; notary pt.iblic? IV-4 .f T1 mod e�C+ � M .V .. •w, ^r arm ervraan..... ., .,. . ., ..a,y.......,.,....:...�..�.�.....a,�.,...._........�........,....�...._.........,�..,...._......._..__.._._...�.*Ev,`,.',G..-.•.• .. C')MI'MCATrS AND APPROVALS: ( ) Pollution Control �Ipi-)roval by letter or memo ( ) I10a1th D,rp;�r. tment approval by letter or memo ( ) Vk.lt!_r. Moriagc:ncnt District (where applicable) approval by letter ;. or memo railroad approval (where applicable) by letter or memo (✓1 Tentative plat approval (t/Lnnd Survr;yor' s certification ( ) Clerk of Circuit Court' s certification ( ) Beard of County Commis^ioners approval and acceptance ( ) Municipal approvals where applicable ( ) Building and Zoning Department approval ( ) Planninq Department approval { PLAT SUBIMITTAL ITEMS ( ) Original. tracing ( /) Four paper prints of plat ( ) Opinion of Title ( ) Proof of paid taxes (receipts) ( ) Processing Fee to Board of County Commissionerg ( ) Recording Fee to Clerk of Circuit Court ( ) Subdivision Improvement Bond where applicable (A Pul:lished notice of replatting when applicable ( ) Florida Power & Light Company underground letter ( ) Paving and Drainage Plan approval (where required) TV--5 A. f .:. ;h err.:.•Y 1�� ` .Yi o.:,v•J.., r.,y�,;n. : .. . .,:,JY, ... ,.y,- ,,i„+�,�'r,i.,,.. ,�w«r”-�•;.��,.�btiu:F,•:•..1•x.+nu. ��• ._..._,.m� •c,+ ���: s�..�-�,.:.+...��...w...-------.... �c�:l.-v�v:a�l•�.,1;,.�,•:tine.,,.wu.�wWa�:.H.?i�..r•�i..:'�.:...._. •i .. �!_«�_._.. PLAT SUB-MITTAI. ITEMS continued ( ) Lake and/or canal excavation coordination ( ) Conformity with Notice of Action of Tentative Plat approval TV—F kri, lfl }Ty : � u�•�ti u,n�, i M C S� TB.���. ;5 ' "+,l. �mond Reed 3 1128 syar wra.:,:x 6r0TOCL s 'aU UC nimek RINQ f The Plan in ng BBoarr ofittie d of South Miami will sanducit a pub , 'lic hearing No-.!'`$7.001":for'the " I of a Final lat the SaraPark Subdivision on-Febf •'�� t t ruary 10, 1987 s The Sara Park Subdivision has a street address of S.W,58thcgve I' nue,proposed S.'W:76th'T'-race i between S.W. 76th Street at;d S:. I. W. 77th T I2 U The legal deSCN Ion (s /a§' U follows: The North + 4 /a" s /z of the N E..;+ —---- the 8.E. +/4 of the N.E."+/4'of.S' Slion 36,Township 54 South,Range 40 East;less the East 286.20 feet i and the West 25.00'feet thereof;, Dade County,Florida. You are hereby advised that if any person desires to appeal any< decision made with respect to any 4 matter considered'at this meeting ' or hearing,such person will need u a record of the proceedings;.end '; for such purpose may need to i ensure that a verbatim,record of . � the proceedings is'made, which record Includes the testimony and 4 evidence upon which"the a ' is to be based. appeal "tM� Public hearing uviN be heida } le the commission chambers at the V City Hall,6130 Sunset Drive,South Miami,Florida,at 7:30 m t/date stated above p' at the ALL interested parties are urged . to attend and objections or expressions of a k I approval may be made in person at'the hearing or filed in writing prior to or at-the r hearing. The Board reserves the right to recommend to the City Commission whatever the Board considers in the best Interest foi the area Involved. The Board's recommendation on this matter ' t will be heard by the City Commis-" Sion at a future date, tentatively` t Scheduled for February 171 1987. Interested parties requesting information are asked to contact the office of the Director of Build-' .the Zoning 81 Community Devel- opment by calling 667-5691 or by j writing. REFER TO HEARING. ' NUMBER WHEN - MAKING MAKING The City of South Miami, f + Planning Board Mark C. Balkovek, Acting Director of Building, Zoning and Community'• Development 1128 87-012842M 3 x :+.% S �! ,y4« ....�,. . ..: -_.1it.._ J.,_..'.' _.i":•�:�s-``w'-nn�P�"" i'Cd':.:..._.-... ..ICE-•_ ..... -�w.u:.r.... wuYr.:Li9ff.L1�i"..u.'''1, 1 r" � r�'�, eq�� frr `� • � r � e� n �� i�' bI '' k� +�� � �'� �> a�f.�,,. ``I�tiw�. �: ��yppp`,,, t �Y. �t1 �pw" et•'�''' sx. R M''r , r.x r}'� p i �}�, ck�-, 4 II x. .,- �'t r,'S� t<�. .. ° ��Th' 1F1`6 4'� et • ,�] 4 '� r"13 � �)� S t ��Ip_.k 7 q� g. r Y`R .. � `�� ¢I a�;, & 1�,•� Y t ��r s# u y i ,M"�i :r--. s Fa ��,�a�ky-�{• T tilt R� �rj, ,`�" - �. R'�r+wh )` f;,° � �S4'�� � w � �Y.t �; �w�r.',• ����......yy����'''''' ..�� w � tq Jw1 � �`�' .�r <,,,. � �� � ., '''4 a Mt � � � � t�i���� 'r tL�. � �r� • Ail N, We i r ,y, GtA y1 � }k f!.�; �,.,t,r�t* J'ttn. � tyi•'� � t v �`., � t atlA { yry•, wt 'kl' k�3 }W.`0 a 4,t� r �'� �al � � 'W,�_ .. r e iy� �� � �3a`'�; �Y�1S' . ' r r � '�,• x �.i a0K 42 7W—l' - ti, G�q'�pi'! W.��53U+ 'W. br..•v t 'fksrF ('�►�' r+r' OF WAY or 4uft^fire f t1"to A perwin who deerdes t0 S$3 ;'' ',k�*rr��f�,�x� 90004512 Me United States of America wilt any decision made by any board. AflotTra�ct A"Of"JAMES A,00 ' be ordered. Inp to tho plat thereof rloof111ed ill +ERICA, agency, or comrnlaatun wrth � ; ;R��a�Qt LEON B.KELLNER respect to any matter considered the Public Recordta of Dadee COYrI{yR', t 111 swullm 26,UNITED STATES ATTORNEY at its meeting or hearing,will need Co Township 52 South,Rap ge 4t? 1r , By:(Illegible) a rectard of the proceedings.s.Such Containing 0.568 acres,In of w t"` }dy�rk� 'c M r' �,;,�„� ventyTwo for B.B.ALLEN p g OWNED SY.,MERL. person may need to ensure that a SUBJECT TO:Mort w'Mr R , -0` Assistant U.S.Attorney verbatim record of,the proceed g&�' 155 South Miami Avenue ings is made, including the tes- 315 in Favor Of: ATLAPt:T#f �+ r' trshal for Miami,Florida 33130 1683 timony and evidence upon which Hollywood.r gae r Ir' "t,yi ,f Florida Tel:(305)536.5934 the appeal is to be based. Mortgage recorded lrt Q.f�.S iescribed 1128 of:GERALDINE RIGHMAK 87.012835M e < uant to a The Interest, it any,of P=VWW re and a BOARD OF COUNTY year to.year tenant. PUBLIC NOTICE COMMISSIONERS P Issued OF ACTION DADE COUNTY, The Interest,if any,of FARM Sl>t?t�t-."^a,lit VWviVW4w4m, ! accord- AND ARREST FLORIDA - 3plemen- UNITED STATES DISTRICT RICHARD P. BRINKER, SECTION 87008-2512 STATE ROAD 924 ' , DADE COUNTY,;': DESCRIPTION Ifalty and ' COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT CLERK FEE SIMPLE LIMITEQ ACCESS RIGHT OF WAY de•appli- OF FLORIDA By: Raymond Reed De PARCEL 107 .'SECTION 87008.2512 �� ••.•-:, !8.U.S.G. CASE NO.86.1990-CIV• A portion of the West 132.00 feet of the. East 1077.00 feet of charges HOEVELER Deputy Clerk Tract 17 of FLORIDA FRUIT LANDS.COMPANY'S SUBDIVI• oral stat• UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,. 1128 87-012830M SION NO. 1, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat s Its for- ' Plaintiff,. --CITY OF SOUTH NIIAM-, Book 2 at Page 17 of the Public Re6ords'of Dade County, 'es.i` v Florida,lying in the NW y4 of Sedtion 25,Township 52 South, Ay'lnter- One Assortment of 23 Firearms, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Range 40 East,Dade County,Florida,being more particularly - ,ed prop- 2,165 Rounds of Ammunition, described as follows: ter than Five Boxes of Primers for Shot The Planning Board of the City date of Shells,4,000 Rifle Primers,7,500 of South Miami will conduct a pub- BEGIN at the intersection of the West line of the East 1077.00 a written Pistol Primers, and One tic hearing No. '87.001 for the feet of said Tract,17, with the South line'oi'sald;•11r4ct417`,*1•''*"m Dr,other Cannister of Hercules Bullseye approval of a Final Plat Map of thence run North 03°41'15"West,along the West line of the attorney, Smokeless Powder having an the Sara Park Subdivision on Feb- East 1077.00 feet of said Tract 17;for a distance of-26.24 feet;" said dis; , .appraised vlaue of$8,780.82, ruary 10, 1987. thence run South 80°17'40" East for a distance.of 135.69 3Iture'to ' Defendants. feet to the point of intersection with the East line of the West orica will The United States Marshal for The Sara Park Subdivision has 132.00 feet of the East 1077.00 feet of said Tract 17,with the the Southern District of Florida a street address of S.W.58th Ave- South line of said Tract 17; thence' run'SOuth 88.33'55` has arrested the above-described inue, proposed S.W. 76th Terrace West,along the South line of said Tract 17;fora distance of 'ORNEY property on January 20, 1987,pur. between S.W. 76th Street and S. 132.10 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING: suant to a Complaint for Forfei• W 771h Terrace. Together with all rights of Ingress,egress,tight,air and view lure and a Warrant of Arrest In between the..grantors' ,remaining property:and.,any facility iey Rem issued by the Clerk of Court The legal description is as constructed on the above described property;:; nnue in accordance with Rule C(3), follows: Containing 1,732 square feet,more or less'..' •1683 Supplemental Rules for Certain OWNED BY:LEON GROSSMAN&REGINA GROSSMAN;•his Admiralty and Maritime Claims, The North 1/2 of the N.E. V. of wife. y.•> :'y:', 112834M as made applicable to this case the S.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of Sec- SUBJECT TO:Mortgage recorded in 0.R.Book 9095 at Ptlge by 28 U.S.C. §2461(b). The Com• tion 36,Township 54 South,Range 1592 in Favor of FIRST NATIONWIDE SAVINGS,&"Federal plaint charges the defendant with 40 East;less the East 286.20 feet Savings&Loan Association. WN a federal statutory violation and and the West 25.00 feet thereof, Mortgage recorded in 0.R.Book 11278•at PBga 23391n Favor dice . seeks Its forfeiture to the United Dade County,Florida. of: THEODORE FREEDMAN,'as Custodian for STACEY JOY 079 States.' FREEDMAN,a minor. . •• •,,, , „ :,,.:,'4: •' - OF THE Any person claiming any inter. You are hereby advised that if Judgement recorded in 0. R. Book 10949 &'•Page 1986 in 'IRCUIT, est'in the above described prop• any person desires to appeal any Favor of:MARTIN GREENFIELD,marital status unknown.. CfUNTY, erty must appear no later than decision made with respect to any The interest; if any, of K & E CONSTRUCTION CORPORA- thirty (30) days from the date of matter considered at this meeting TION,a Florida Corporation. )N .. this publication and file a written or hearing,such person will need The Interest, if any, to INVESTORS MORTGAGE GROUP, verified claim, answer or other a record of the proceedings, and INC. defense,in person,or by attorney, for such purpose may need to The Interest,If any,of E.B.KLINE,BROKER,-.;.A LUISA at the Clerk's Office in said dis• ensure that a verbatim record of The interest, If any, of K/F DEVELOPMENTrAND INVEST-` )SARIO trict, or default and forfeiture to the proceedings is made, which MENT CORPORATION: :•. „. the United States of America will record includes the testimony and You are each notified that the Petitioner filed its sworn Petition be ordered. evidence upon which the appeal and its Declaration of Taking in this Court against you as defendants, LEON B. KELLNER is to be based. seeking to condemn by eminent domain proceedings,the above -UTSCH' UNITED STATES ATTORNEY described property located in the State•of Florida; County of Dade BANK, By:[illegible) Public hearing will be held in You are further notified that the Petitloner�wltl apply to the Honor- oreign for B.B.ALLEN the commission chambers at the able Joseph Nadler,one of the Judges of this Court on the 27 day of Assistant U.S.Attorney City Hall,6130 Sunset Drive,South March,A.D., 1987,at 8:00 o'clock A.M.,in Dade County Courthouse, 155 South Miami Avenue Miami, Florida,at 7:30 p.m.at the Miami,Florida,for an Order of Taking Iri this cause:All defendants to ch Miami,Florida 33130.1683 date stated above. this suit may request a hearing at the time and place-designated and Tel:(305)536.5934 be heard. Any defendant failing to file a request for hearing shall )TIFIE:D- '1128 87.012837M ALL interested parties are urged waive any right to object to the Order of Taking. an filed to attend and objections or :,AND ,.. ,•. . I Court, expressions of approval may be Each defendant is hereby required to serve,written defenses, If In and PUBLIC HEARING made in person at the hearing or any,and request a hearing,if desired,to Bald-Petitiomonr. • I, Case filed in writing prior to or at the DEPARTMENT OF AND •..STATE<OF.FLORIDA ie style '' DADE COUNTY,FLORIDA hearing. The Board reserves the TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT at forth, right to recommend to the City 401 Northwest 2nd Avenue '­'OF TRANSPORTATION a copy NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Commission whatever the Board Room 510 Eminent Domain Legal; If any, ON PETITION TO CLOSE ROAD considers in the best interest for Miami the ,Florida 33128 Office Mail Station 24 ; aintiff's r: e area involved. The Board's clo Barbara K.Hobbs, -,Haydon f3tirn9 Building ' Adman, TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: recommendation on this matter District Six Attorney ,,7;; Tallahassee,Florida 32301 t.,Suite will be heard by the City Commis- (305)377-5367 -(904)'488-2611 ; Aevard, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sion at a future date, tentatively on or before the 27 day of February,A.D. 1987,and,file the originals r•befote under and pursuant to Sections scheduled for February 17, 1987. with the Clerk of this Court on that date,to show cause what lrlght, , file the ,336.09 and 336.10, Florida Stat- Interested parties requesting title, interest, or lien you or any of you have In end to the property ,;lark o'f u1es,and Resolution No. R-13-87 information are asked to contact described in the Petition and to show cause,If any.you-h'ave.why the :'aserv- passed by the BOARD OF the office of the Director of Build- property should not be condemned for the.uses`and.-purposes set ly of COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ing, Zoning & Community Devel• forth in the Petition. If you fail-to answer,a.default may be entered 'wise DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, the opment by calling 667.5691 or by against you for the relief demanded In the Petftlon;'If you fall to ;st said Board will hold a public hear- writing. REFER TO HEARING request a hearing on the Petition for Order of Taking you shall waive �i1 ing on the 17th day of Feb. 1987, NUMBER WHEN MAKING any right to object to said Order of Taking. - - t 9:00 o'clock in the morning at INQUIRY. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL of'said Court on'the 26-day•of: 'hs meeting room on the 2nd floor JAN,A.D., 1987, '.the Dade County Court House, The City of South Miami Richard P.Brinker*' consider the advisability of Planning Board CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT nting the petition of Mark C. Baikovek, (Seal) ; y. ''"r lica Estates Corp.,et al. Ac!inq Direct',r of BUildine. BY:JENNIS Ir RUSSELL: L,_,!W,.