PB MINS 11-08-60 - 12-10-63c
,-
'-"
",-,.
t: ---
Present:
HINUTES OF THE REGULAR }ffiETING OF
THE SOUTH }UAMI PLANNING AND 20 :ING
BOARD, NOV EMBER 8, 1960, AT THE SOUTH
MIAr-II CITY HALL AT 8:00 P.H.
Chairman Stanton
Carl Paden
Hyron Keys
James Ferguson, Jr.
Albert Corsiglia
John Baau
George Kramer
Thomas Foster
Leon Thaler
John Converse
Ex Officio: J. L. Greene
Absent: R. E. Rutledge, Jr.
Mr. Foster, seconded by Hr. Converse, moved that the minutes of
the special meeting of October 18, 1960 be approved as individually
read.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Paden, seconded by Mr. Brau, moved that the minutes of the
regular me e ting of October 11, 1960 be approved corrected (Re: Ci-
anflone Plat ~ Polled 9 Yes -1 No Kramer (Trees should be removed
from dedicated R/Iol by developer).
Polled -Motion carried unanimously.
~~-;:.{~. -:HB~ ~:~:--:;.
Chairman Stanton then read the notice of public hearing on the ap-
plication of E. B. Brown, owner of Lot 6 Block 4 Cocoplum Terrace
Addition Subdivision, for a variance or special use permit to allow
an upholstery and/or sign shop at 6470-648 0 S ~V 62 Avenue.
The area of notification was 300 feet. There were no letters receiv ed
by the Board either for or against this application.
Mr. Brown was present and stated that his request was based on exist-
ing zoning uses on this strip of SW 62 Avenueo
After due consideration, the Board, by action noted below indicated
they desired to resurvey this area before acting on this application "
Mr. Brau, seconded b y Mr. Paden, moved that the E. B. Brown a?pli-
cation be tabled until the n e xt me e ting of the Planning and Zoning
Board.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously.
'.< ~.
\.....,
o
-2-
Chairman Stanton then read the notice of p ublic hearing on the
application of Mr. & Mrs. W. V. Holloway, owner of the w80' of
Tract A and Lots 1,2 Brewer Manor Subdivision for permission to
retain the E 5' of Lots 1,2 for the purpose of placing a driveway
to the rear of Tract A. Location: 6645 Sw 76 ~errace.
The area of notification was 300 fe e t. There we re no letters
received by the Board either for or against this application.
November 4, 1960
To the Zoning Board of South Hiami:
We would like permission to retain five feet from the rear of the
two lots, legally known as Lots 1,2 Brewer Manor, adjoining our
home . This would enable us to have a driveway to the r ear of our
house .
\"e would appreciate your consideration in this matter .
Sincerely,
Nr . & Mrs . W . V . Holloway
'-' 6645 SW 76 Terrace
Nrs. H . Meyer was present and stat e d that as purchaser of Lots 1,2
Brewer Manor Subdivision fr om the Holloways she had no ob jections to
the application.
BOARD'S ACTION ON PUBLIC HEARING
Re : Hr . &. }1rs . W. V. Holloway
t1r . Paden, seconded by Mr. Corsiglia , moved that the Planning and
Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the application of
Hr. It, Mrs . W . V . Holloway, owners of the W 75' of Tract A and Lots
1,2 Brewer Hano r Subdivision be officially allowed to retain the E 5'
of Lots 1,2 Brewer Na nor Subdivision a nd further that Lots 1,2
Brewer Hanor Subdivision be c on side red as individual bu ilding sites.
Location: SW 67 Avenue and S \,I 76 Terrace.
~;H:·~:·
Polled -8 Yes
1 Ab stained
1 No
-iHH:· ~HH~
Hr . Paden, seconded by Mr . FORter,moved that the a p plication of the
Reve r e nd E . P. Brown o f !'it . Oli ve Baptist Church be removed from the
table.
Polled -}1o tion carried unanimously.
The Reverend Bro l-In introduced }1 r. o . K. Houstoun, archi tect for the
church. Mr . Houstoun presented a plot plan and perspective of the
~
c
c
c
-3-
proposed l ayout of the church and stated that the p r oposed location
on the plot plan gives the maxi mum separation (setbacks) pos s ib l e
and stil l meet the seating requirements of the church . All off
stree t parking has been e l iminated .
BO ARD 'S ACTION ON PUBLIC HEARING
Re: Mt. Olive Baptist Church
}l r . Br a u, seconded by Mr . Fo .'-ter , moved that the Planning and Zoning
Board recommend to the City Counci l that the application of the Ht .
Olive Baptist church , owner of Lots 12 ,13 Block 2 Ha~let Subd i vis i on
for variances of :
Front setback -5 feet .
Rear" -40 "
Side" -38 .5 feet each side be g r anted in
view of apparent inabi l ity of the churc h to obtain additional land
area adja c ent to subjec t prope rt y . A further conside r at i on o f thi s
recommendation being that a church has e x i sted on this property for
many years and needs rep l acing as it is a frame bui l d i ng . It i s
a l so r ecommended that a variance be granted el i mi nating a ll o f f st r eet
parki ng due to size of lots and the fact that this is a "walk to "
chur c h . Location : 6316 S '} 59 Place
.:: .. :: .. :~
Pol l ed -1 0 Yes
o No
·:HH:·
There b eing
the meeting
no furth e r busines~, by motion and properly
was adjourned at 9:15 P . N .
By: i . t /ivz(24UU
J . LV Greene , Zoning Inspector
~:-:H:'
seconded ,
-_.
~
'--
c
c·
~rrNU TE S OF THE REGULAR NEi.!.'TING OF
THE S OU TH f1IM'!I PL ANN I NG AN D 7,ON H m
BO./l RD, DEC GHBER 13, 1960, AT THE ROUTH
~HMH CI TY HAL L AT 8 :00 P. M.
Pr e s e nt:J a ck St a nton, Ch a irman
Myron Ke ys
Ge orge Kr am e r
Al be rt Cors igli a
Ca rl P a de n
Thom a s Foste r
John Co nv e r se
J ames E . F e r guson, Jr.
Ex Offici o : J. L. Greene
Abs e nt: R. B . Rutle d ge , Jr.
Le on Tha l e r
J ohn Brau
Mr . F e rguson, s e c on de d b y Mr . Fos t e r, mo v ed t h a t the minut e s
o f t he r egul a r me o t ing o f No vemb e r 2 9 , 1 960 b e approve d a s
indiv idua lly r ead.
Polled -~lo ti o n c a rrie d unani mo usly.
-:H :";:--lHH:--:HH~
Ch a irman Sta n ton the n r ead the no t ice of p ublic h e aring on
the appl i cati on of Iv e rs on Head, own e r of th a t prope rty d e s-
cribe d as Be gin 115' W of SE corne r SE t Sllfi run W 9()' N 2()(l'
E 9 0 ' S 20 0 ' to POB of 3 e c t ion 2 5 -5L.-40 , fo r a cha nge of'·'zoni ng
f r om RU -l t o C-l on the rear 1 00 f ee t.
The area of notific a tion wa s 30 0 '. The r e we r e n o l e tters
re c eive d b y t h e Bo a r d e ithe r for o r aga ins t this a p plicat ion.
P l anning a nd Zoning Bo a rd
Ci t y of S o uth }1 iami
Ge ntle men:
No vemb e r 15, 1 9 60.
Att a c he d is my applic a tion f o r r e zon in g the b a ck 100 f e et of
my p r o p e rty a t 6 209 -6 211 Sun se t Drive .
,i ould like this bac k 100 f ee t to b e r e z on e d to e qual zoning of
t h e front 100 f ee t a nd the ad j o ini n g prop e rty on the e ast and
we s t s i de of t h is prope rty .
Re sp e ctfully y ours,
Ive rson Head
The r e we r e no obj e ct o rs t o t h is applic a tion.
~
r ' -2-
BOARD'S ACTION ON PUBLIC HEARIN G
Re: Iverson Head
Mr. Ferguson, s e conded b y Hr . Kramer, moved that the
Planning and Zoning Board r e commend to the City Council
that the application of Iverson Head , owner of that property
described as Begin 115' W of SE corne r SE t Svlt run W-90'
r 200 ' E 90' S 200' to POB of Se ction 25-54-40, -for a change
of zoning fro"1 RTT -l to C-l on the r ea r 1 00 ', h e fT rnnt c d a s
thil' ,rill conform t o trw d €)l t h o f C-l zonod proP "rty to the
west . Location: Nt .. corne r of SunS f t and SW 62 Avenue.
-:HH:-
Polled -A Yes
o No
~E:-~:-~H~-~:-
Chairman Stanton then r ead the notic e of public hearing
on the application of John Trabold, ol-mer of Lots 4,5
Block 2 McKee v e r Terrace Subdivision a nd R. K. Fink, at-
torney for owners of Lots 1 through 3 Block 2 t'!cKeever
Terrace Subdivision and Lots 1 thro ugh 5 Block 1 NcKeever
Terrace Subdi vision, Lots 11 through 24 Block 2 B.ird hoad
estates Subdivision and Lot~ 1 through 5 and 8 through 11
Block 1 Bird Road Es tates Subdivision for a change of zoning
from RU -2 to C-l.
Planning and Zoning Board
City of South Miami
Gentlemen :
November 28, 1960
This application is made for the specific purpose of re-
zoning this prop e rty to C-l to a llow for the erecting of
a 7-11 store on two of these lots, plans and specifi-
cations for which have b ee n submitted , and to open the way
for negoti a tions leading to other desirable business improve-
ments.
The present zoning on this property, namely duplexes, is
in every way lillsuitable for the following reasons:
1. It fronts on an art e rial highway with heavy traffic a ll
year round a nd espe cially during the racing season with
resultant noise, dirt and hazard especially to children.
The acces~ to the n e w e xpressway nearby, opening soon,
will t e nd to make this situation considerably worse.
2. Some of the properties in question have a frontage of
25 f e 6 t and some fifty fe e t with a depth after further
stree t widening anticipated of only 85 feet. A lot
25 x 85 has a square foota ge of only 2,125 feet, and a
lot 50 x 85 has a square footage of only 4,250 feet.
The pre sent zoning requires a minimum square footage of
r
'--
c
c
-3-
of 10,000 square fe e t. It is obvious that these lots
are too small for dup l exes . This situation came about
because this property was pla tted in 25 foot lots, in-
tended for busines~ use, and sold as such.
In the block betwe e n 64 Avenu e and 65 Avenue , the City has
already rezoned a lar ge parcel to business and the County
has rezoned the rest of the block to B-3 and a gas station
and tire company are already in operation there. This is
the situation on the we st boundary of the prope rt y for
which this request for r e zoning is being made . On the
east, the City has already rezone d to G-l a ll of the property
in the City whi ch fronts on Bird Road . In othe r 1M) rds the
City has a lre ady rezoned to C-l a ll of the prop e rty in the
City which fronts on Bird Road e xcept these four blocks.
Meanwhile we are paying taxeR on this property year after
y e ar without b e ing able to mak e use of it be caus e of
i mp rope r zoning. We f ee l that it is time that the strip
was brought int o conformity with C-l zoning throughout so
that some progress can be made in imp roving it. All of the
property on Bird noad from Red Road to Snapper Creek is
either a lready i r.:proved or bein g rapi d ly improved with
businesses. 'l 'h e f o ur blo cks in que ~tion for whi ch this ap-
plication is made constitute an island in the midst of what
is now cownonly known a s a business stro e t.
There are no homes on this prope rty except one wh1~:'is
combine d with the Real E stat e Office . The only other im-
prove ment is a church which op e r a t e s a nurs e ry schoo l for
which it makes a charge . The church is using a large part
of its property for a parking l ot .
If this property is not rezoned for business it wi ll remain
vacant with very negli r,ible r evenue to the City and a very
substantial loss to the owners . the FHA has rep ea tedly
refused to insure mortgage s on this prope rty on the ground
that Bird Road is an arterial highway and that it is not
suitable for residential use. Business improvements will
bring the City substantial income in taxes which will derive
to the b e nefit of all.
Recently the Court r u l ed that the zoning on this property
was unreasonabl e: and dire cted the City to give this property
a more liberal zoning. Putting two famili e s whe r e it is not
suitable for one does not solve the problem or cha nge
the nature of the zoning in any way . This problem has
existe d for t o n y e ars or more w·1~hout a satisfactory solution.
In the light of this and a ll of the above facts He feel that
the matter should be reconsidered, and that the only
solution is for the City to rezone this prope rty to C-l. We
respectfully request that the P lanning and Zoning Board and
the Council rec ons ider t his matte r carefully, in the light
of all of the above, and fe e l confident in a ll reason and
fairness that a rezoning of this property to C-l will be
finally decided upon, and e ff e cte d.
Respectfully submitted,
Robert .X. Fink
,-
c
-4-
6294 S ~i 41 Stree t
Miami 55. Florida
December 10 , 1 960
CITY OF SOUTH HL'-\JIH PLANNING f.ND ZO NING BOARD
Re; Rezoning hearing for John Trabold and R . K . Fink
as attorney for owners
Gent l emen:
It is very distressing to us to have to again express o u r
distaste for the rezoning of a few lotts on Bird Road to
C -l . tve have had to do this every two years since we
bought our property in 1 948 ~ Now it comes up again just
two months since the last hearing .
lrJe do not need any !'lo r e eyesores or traffic bottlenecks
on Bird ROAd. Traffic is so bad now , one cannot enter
Bird Road without a long wait for an opening . The lots
are not deep enough (l(j6 ft .) for sufficient off stroet
park i.ng . We oppose this rezoning due to the lacl{ of a
need or want for additiona l businesses in this quiet
residential neighborhood .~/e do not ne ed or want any more
eyesores that are a lways having vacancies or business
tur novers as Hitness th e Bird and Dudlum Roads area .
Please give us home owners your greatest consideration in
this matter and keep our area residential as it is and
was when so many of us invested in our homes .
Sincerely ,
Hr . and rl rs . Eugene B . Simpson
Mr . Fink, Hr . Trabo l d and Hr . Hoehner spoke in beha l f of
this application.
Several property owners in the area were present and voi c ed
strong objections to the application for a change of zoning
and variance as r e queflted . See lett e r above as typica l o f
objectionfl.
After leng thy discu ss ion, the Board acted as fo llows :
Mr . Fos te r , se conded by I"Jr . Conv e r se ,mo ved that the appl i-
cation of John Trabold and R . K . Fink be tabled unti l the
next regular meeting of the P l anning and Zoning Board .
Po l led -Mo tion carried unanimously •
. ;:--::-~:--:H:-~:--:HH;-
Mr. Corsiglia, seconded by Hr . Foster, moved that the
application of E . E . Brown , owner of L ot 6 Block 4 Cocoplum
"
r'
G
-5-
Terrace Addition Subdivision, for a variance or Special
Use permit to alloH an upholstery shop and sign shop at
6~.70-80 SlN 62 Avenue be removed from the table.
Polled -Notion carried 1L."lanimously .
Af t e r l e ngthy discussion about this strip of C-l zoned
property from SH 64 Stre e t to S I,J 68 Street on the Hest
side of Sl-J 62 Avenue , the Board took the folloHing action:
Hr . Paden, seconded by llr . Corsi"lia, moved tha t the appli-
cation of E . B . BroHn be tabled until the next regular
meeting .
Polled -Hotion carried unanimously .
-:~--::-~~--;:--;:--;:--::--;.~-;:-
The next item of business was the revis ed final plat of
CIANFLOlffi Subdivision .
BOARD 'S ACTION ON FlNAL PLAT
Re: Cianflone Subdivision
I1r . Ferguson, s econded by l'1 r. l"oster , moved that the
Planning and Zoning Board r e commend to the City Council
that the final plat of CI AN FLONl:!: Subdivision be approved
insofar as zoning is concerned . Location: S1II eO Stree t
and SH 58 Avenue.
~:--:i--::-
Polled -I'> Yes
o No
-;:-~H ;' ~H :·~:-
The next item of busine ss was a tentative p l an of Glasser
and Kl ein to create tVIO building sites on Lots 1,2,3
Block 12 Seaview Park c;ubdivision Amended , by facing the
houses on sw 51'> Avenue . SeJ 58 Avenue to be paved by
developer .
The Board indicated that H r . Glasser and Nr . Klein should
submit a formal application to the Board .
~HH:--;:--;H:--;HH:-
The next ite m of business was a tentative p l an submitted
by H . J. Hoodwin and Associates , architect for Norman
Kutne r, lesse e of Lot 16 H . A . Larkins Subdivision . This
tentative plan shows a seven story building , first floor
as business shops and six floors as apartment-hotel with
no off streot parking provided by applicant . '.L'he applicant
requested that th e Board consider the nearby city parking
lots as adequate to p rovid o n c c o f, sary nnrking for t c n s nts
of this p r op os ,d building . It VIas po i n t e d Ol lt by apnJ.icant
thnt tho city would dorive income from parking meters due
to tenants parking over night .
-
'-.J
-6 -
Mr . );'oster , seconded by Nr . Corsiglia , moved that the
tentat ive proposal for a seven story apa rtme nt -ho t e l b e
tab l ed and the secretary contact City of fl iami Beach
a nd City o f l'I i ami to de t ermine if they g i ve cons i deration
to this t ;T p e of ap p l icatio n based on mun icipal parking l ot s
bein/! l ocated adjacent to o r nea rby a.nd if they do -wha t
p robl ems have deve l oped , if any .
Po l led -Ho ti on carried u nan i mously .
There being no fu rth e r business , by mot i on and properl y
seconded , th e me e tin g was adjo u rned at 1 0:15 P .M.
By: o 0jJ, (/"/'1 " J<CUJ eU
J . L . -Greene , Zo n ing-Inspe ctor
'-
c
c
tUWTES. OF THE REGULAR r-lEEI'ING OF ...
THE SOUTH HIAHI PLANNING AND ZONING
BOARD, JANUARY 10, 1961, AT THE SOUTH
HIAMI CITY HALL AT 8: 00 P.M.
Present: Jack Stanton, Chairman
Hyron Keys
George Kram8r
Albert Corsiglia
Carl Paden
John Converse
James Ferguson, Jr .•
R. E. Rutledge, Jr.
Leon Thaler
John Brau
Ex Officio: J. L. Greene
Absent: Thomas Foster
Mr. Paden, seconded by Mr. Rutledge, moved that the minutes of
the regular meeting of December 13, 1960 be adopted as individually
read.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously.
~H :-~:-{:-·:H:· ~H:-*
Chairman Stanton then read the notice of public hearing on the ap-
plication of the First Baptist Church of South Miami, owner of Lots
1 through 5, st 6, S~ 22 and Lots 23 through 26 Poinciana Park Re-
vised PB/P 41/4. Also, Lots 23 throu~h 26. S 45' of Lot 22 and
Tract 2 of W. A. Hobbs Subdivision PB/P 4/111, for a change of zon-
ing from RU-l to C-l.
The area of notification was 300'. There were no objections re-
ceived by the Board by mail.
The Reverend Max Morris and Mr. Lucien C. Proby addressed the Board
on behalf of the Church stating the following reasons for their
request:
1. The Church desires to move to a larger (acreage) location
as the cost of land adjacent to this property in question is priced
out of their reach.
2. A group desiring to establish a bank in South Miami has
agreed to purchase the vacant property owned by the Church in
Poinciana Park Subdivision as a site for a proposed bank. However,
a change of zoning is necessary in order that this banking group
may apply for a state charter.
3.
pave the
of their
The sale of these lots in Poinciana Park
way for the Churdh to purchase elsewhere
property, including the existing church,
Subdivision will
and offer the rest
for sale.
There were no objectors to this application present.
'-
'O"....l ...
BOARD'S ACTION ON PUBLIC HEARING
Re: First Baptist Church of South Miami
Mr. Keys, seconded by Mr. Brau, moved that the Planning and Zoning
Board recommend to the City Council that the application of the First
Baptist Church of South Miami be DENIED for a change of zoning to C-l
on Lots 23 through 26, the S 45' of Lot 22 and Tract 2 of W. A. Hobbs
Subdivision PB/p 41111. However, the Board recommends to the City
Council that a change of zoning from RU-1 to C-1 be GRA NTED on those
lots described as Lots 1 through 5, S~ Lot 6 S~ L 22 and Lots 23 thru
26 Poinciana Park Revised PB/p 41/41.
Po11ed-6 Yes
4 No Kramer, Corsiglia, Paden and Thaler
~: .. :: .. :;. -*-i:-* {Hh'}
Chairman Stanton then read the notices of public hearing on the ap-
plications described below and the Board considered them as one
application.
Ap plication of Harilee H. Gaz1ay, owner of Lots 13,14 Block 3 Wester-
field Manor Subdivision PB/p 18/47, for a change of zoning from RU-l
to C-l, for the p urpose of e r e cting a conforming comme rcial building
on this property.
Application of Edna C. Gladden, owner of Lots 13,14,15 Block 6 West-
erfield Manor Subdivision PB/p 18/47, for a change of zoning from
RU-1 to C-l for the purpose of ere cting a conforming commercial build-
ing on this property.
Ap plication of Charles Ivanick, owner of Lots 25,26,27 Block 7 Wester-
field Man or Subdivision PBlp 18/47, for a change of zoning from RU-l
to C-l for the purpose of erecting a conforming commercial building
on this property.
The area of notification was 300' on each of these ap~lications.
Letters and petitions of objection (approximately 100) were received
by the Board.
Mr. Rogers Edwards, attorney for applicatns, addressed the Board
stating that his clients are unable to sell their property for RU-l
use. Parking will be locate d to egress from the side streets rather
than on Red Road. Mr. Edwards presented a petition signed by several
property owners in the area waiving any objections to this proposed
rezoning. A plot plan was submitted showing typical use.
Approximately 100 property own ers from the area-City of South r·~iami.
Coral Gables and Dade County-were present objecting to these appli-
cations for rezoning.
The City of Coral Gables as well as the Dade County Zoning Department
officially objected to these applications for rezoning.
Summary of Objections:
1. No justification for rezoning as there are residences adja-
cent to this area on the west side of Red Road as well as across Red
-2-
'--
v
l
· Road in Coral Gables; therefore, these lots can be used for residences.
2. Co mmercial use will increase traffic problems-entrances and
exits will add to the accident hazard on busy Red Road.
3· Sub-marginal busine ss adversely affects this residential
area.
4.
does not
The existing shopping c ente r offers comple te services and
need t o be e nlarged or extended.
5. Increas e d traffic endangers children going to and from scho o l.
BOARD'S ACTION ON PUB LIC HEARING
Re : Harilee H. Gazlay
l"f r. Rutledge, seconded b y Hr. Corsiglia, moved that the Planning and
Zoning Board r e commend to the City Council that the application of
Har ilee H. Gazlay , owner of Lo ts 13,14 Block 3 We ste rfield Hanor Sub -
division PB/P 1 8/!,7, for a change of zoning from RU-l to C-l b e deni e d
for the f o llowing r easons:
1. No hardshiJ:) s how n.
2. Lack of need for extension of comm erci a l zoning in the area.
3. Proposed chan ge will not promote the health or welfare of
the citize ns of the area.
4. Propose d change does not conf o r m with the proposed Ma ster
P lan.
Loc ation : NW corne r SW 42 Stre e t and Red Road.
Polled -10 Yes
o No
BOARD 'S ACTI ON ON PUBLIC FEAR I NG
Re : Edna C. Gladden
}1r. Corsi glia, seconded by ~1 r. Thaler, moved that the Planning and
Zoning Board reco~mend to the City Council that the application of
Edna C. Gladden, owner of Lots 13,4,15 Block 6 l.Je sterfield t1 anor Sub-
division PB /p 1 8/47, for a chan ge of zoning from Ru-l to C-l be deni e~
for the followin g reasons:
1. No hardship shown.
2. Lack of need for e xt ension of c omme rcial zoning in the area.
3. P roposed cha n ge will not promote the health or welfare of t he
c itizens of the area.
4. Proposed change does not c o nform with the proposed Master Plan.
Location NW corne r SW 42 Terrace and Re d Ro a d.
Polled -10 Yes o No -3-
BO ARD'S ACTI ON ON PlJBLIC REARING
Re: Charles Ivanick
"' .
Hr. Kramer, seconded by Hr. Paden, moved that the Planning and Zonin g
Board recommend to the City Council that the application of Charles
Ivanick, owners of Lots 25,26,27 Block 7 Westerfield Hanor Subdivisi o:.·.
PB/p 18;\7, for a change of zoning from RU-l to C-l be denied for tho
following reasons:
1. No hardship shown;
2. Lack of n e ed for extension of commercial zoning in the area.
3. Pro-posed change will not promote the health or welfare of
the citizens of the area.
4. Proposed change does not conform with the -pro p osed Haster
Plan.
Location SloJ corner m·J 4.2 Terrace and Red Road.
Polled -18 Yes -::-;:--::-No ;:--::--:, .:~-:: .. ::.
Hr. Keys, seconded by Hr. Rutled p:e, moved that the matter of the
application of John Trabold a nd R. K . Fink be removed from the table ,
(Tabled at meeting of December 13, 1960).
Polled -18 Ye s o No
'--' BO ARD'S ACTI ON ON PUBLIC Hl::ARI NG
Re: John Trabold and H. K. Fink
Mr. F e rguson, seconded by Mr. Paden, moved that the a pplication of
John Trabold and R. K. Fink be denied.
Legal Description: Lots 1-3 Block 2 HcKeever Terrace Subdivision
Lots 1-5 Block 1 McKeever Terrace Subdivision
Lots 11-24 Block 2 Bird Road Estates Subdivision
Lots 1-5, 8-11 Block 1 Bird Road Estates Subdivi~'··
Location: Bird Road-South Side-betwe e n SI-J 61 and 64 Avenues.
Polled -9 Yes
1 No Corsi g lia
~HH:· -lHH:· -::--:H~
The re being no fruthe r business, by motion and properly seconded,
the meetin g was adjourne d at 10:15 P.M.
By : ~ vJ.,e ,. of.-.: !j';~-~ ~~~0~~~~<7~~~~~~~= J. L~ Greene, Zoning Inspector
'--
'-'
:--.'
.• '-.!
MINUTES OF THE REGUL AR ~1EETING OF
THE SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING
BOARD, JANUARY 31, 1961, AT 8:00 P.M.
Present: Jack Stanton-Chairman
George Kramer
Myron Keys
John Brau
Albert Corsiglia
Carl Paden
Thomas Foster
Leon Thaler
John Converse
Ex Officio: J. L. Greene
Absent: James Ferguson, Jr.
R. E. Rutledge, Jr.
Mr. Corsiglia, seconded by Mr. Paden, moved that the minutes of
the regular meeting of January 10, 1961 be adopted as individaul1y
read.
Polled -Motion carrie d unanimously.
·:H H;~ ~HH~ ·:H~~:·
Chairman Stanton then read the notice of public hearing on the
application of S. R. Rand, attorney for the property owners of
all of W.A.Hobbs Subdivision, for a change of zoning from RU-l
and RU-2 to C-l.
The area of notification was 300 feet.
Mr. Rand addressed the Board stating that with commercial zoning
on the east, south and north the property owners in W.A.Hobbs
Subdivision submit to the Board that this subdivision should be
C-l and that there is hardship present due to the adjoining C-l
usage.
Dr. C . M. Ove rstreet
7320 SW 63 Aven ue
South Miam i 43, Florida
TO THE SOUTH 11IAl'lI PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD --MR ... J AGK STlrNTON,yH AI RMAN
On behalf of my own household and those of my neighbors on 63
Avenue south of Sunset, with Whom I have discussed this proposal
to rezone the W.A.Hobbs Subdivision, we wish to r egister our ob-
jections. We feel that:
1. There is already quite a bit of vacant business property
on Sunset east of 62 Av e nue.
2. We who li ve on 63 Avenu e are afraid that rezoning this
area to C-l would devalue our property. Mo st of us along
this avenue have lived here a good many years, and have
v
.. ~ ..
" -2 -
spent considerable money and a lot of time and effort in keeping
our property in good shape .
3. In the brochure recently put out by the City of South Miami
a long range Master Plan for the City was outlined . This
reque st for C-I zoning of this a r ea would not be in accord-
ance with the Master Plan as we understand it.
It is our hope that your Board will reject this application for
rez oning this area .
BOARD'S ACTION ON PUBLIC HEARING
Re: W.A.Hobbs Subdivision
Mr . Kr amer, seconded by Mr. Corsiglia, moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the application
of S. R. Rand , attorney for property of the entire W.A .Hobbs Sub -
division, for a change of zoning fr om RU -l and RU -2 to C-l be
denied at this time for the following reasons:
1. Lack of p lan for develo pment .
2 . No hardship .
3. Sufficient undeveloped C-l zoning in the area .
~_. Wi ll not serve the best interest of the City at this time .
C Location: sw 62 Avenue , Sunset Drive , SW 62 Place and SW 74 Street .
c
Polled -Motion carried unanimously .
-:HH:-~:--:H:-~:--:H:-
Chairman Stanton then read the notice of public hearing on the
application of Norm Kutner, 99 year lessee, of Lot 16 W.A.Larkins
Subdivision for a variance on all off-street parking to allow
construction of a seven story apartment -hotel with stores on the
first floor .
The area of notification was 300 feet. Several lette r s were
received by the Board for and against this application .
Mr . Hoodwin, agent for lessee, propose d that nearby municipal
parking l ots be considered adequate for off-street parking re -
quirements . Necessary dedication of R/W leaves an adjusted lot
size of 70' X 115' and the proposed build i ng is 70' X 100'.
Aft er due consideration in executive session the Board requested
that Mr . Kutner should indicate specifically if this proposed
building will have apartments and if so how many or if it wi ll be
hotel rooms and hotel suites.
BOARD' ,S ACTION ON PUBLIC REA'U NG
Re: Norm Kutner
Mr . Thaler, seconded b y Mr. Brau, moved that the application of
Norm Kutner be tabled and that revised plans be submitted showing
intent as to hotel and apartment units.
-3-
Po lled -Mo tion carried unanimously.
~H:··::--t:-:H:-.;:--::--;:-
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: Tentativ e Plat -Resubdivision of ACKER HOMESITES.
Mr. Paden, s econded by Hr. Kramer moved that this plat be ap-
proved insofar as zoning is concerned.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously.
-:H:-::--:HH:-';HH~
Mr. Foster, seconded by Mr. Keys, moved tha t the E .B . Brow n ap-
p lication be removed from the table for action at this time.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously.
After discu ssion , ~1r . Paden
the E . B. Brown application
majority vote either way.
seconded by Hr . Corsiglia, moved that
be tabled again due to th e lacK of a
Polled -Mo tion carri ed unan imous ly.
-:: .. ::--::--::--::--::-';HH:-
There being no fruther business , by motion prope rly made and
seconded, the meeting was adjourned at 9 :3 0 P.H .
By: n V~I ;r '11 '· \l'(LLetuU
.:r:-q;:-Gr eene , Zoning Director
"" ,
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEh"'TING OF
THE SOUTH H IANI PLANNING AND ZONING
~ BOARD, FEBRU ARY 14, 1961, AT 8:00 P.M.
c
Present: Jack Stanton-Chairman
George Kramer
Hyron Keys
John Brau
Albert Corsiglia
Carl Paden
Thomas Foster
Leon Thaler
John Converse
James Ferguson
Ex Officio: J. L. Greene
Absent : R. E. Rutledge
Mr . Kramer, seconded by Mr. Corsiglia, moved that the minutes of the
re gular meeting of January 31, 1961 be approved as individually read.
Po lled -Motion carried unanimously.
-:HH:-~HH~ -:k:-~:-
There were no scheduled public hearings.
-::'-:H~-~HH~ ~HH~
Mr. Foster, seconded by Hr. Pacten, moved that the Kutner application be
removed from the table. (Tabled at the January 31, 1961 meeting for the
purpose of Mr. Kutner clarifying the use--apartment hotel or hotel).
Polled -Mot ion carried unanimous ly.
Mr . Kutner was present and addressed the Board stating that he proposes to
erect a seven story hotel. There will be three units with kitchens for
temporary occupancy on each of the hotel floors. The ground floor occu-
pancy will include stores and service facilities for the hotel. The roof
area will include penthouse facilities for the elevator operation and
water supply equipment.
BOARD'S ACT I ON ON PUBLIC HEARING
Re: Norm Kutner
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Converse, moved that the Planning and Zoning
Board recommend to the City Council that the application of Norm Kutner,
lessee of Lot 16 lti . A . Larkins Subdivision, for a variance of fifty (50)
off-street park ing spaces to allow construction of a seven (7) story
hotel with stores and service facilities for the hotel on the first floor
be granted and further that a variance be granted to allow kitchen facili-
ties in three units on each hotel floor.
Polled -Yes 6
No 4 Thaler, Corsiglia, Foster, Ferguson
T
"....,
~ o
"--'
'--
c
Mr. Ferguson voted NO because he is unaware of any Council policy rela-
tive to the City furnishing off-street parking for this immediate area.
NOTE: The Board recommends that the City Council give eonsideration to:
1.
2.
3·
~HH~'
Possible amendment to Sec. 20-2 (24) of the Zoning Code--
cooking facilities in hotel rooms.
Precedent being established on off-street parking requirements
for this area.
High rise hotel fronting on two streets without setbacks except
on rear fifteen (15) fe e t (proposed structure 70' x 101').
·;HH~ ~HH~
Mr. Kramer, seconded by Mr. Ferguson, moved that the Brown application be
removed from the table.
Po lled -Mo ti on carried unanimously .
Mr . Ferguson, seconded by r1 r. Keys, move d that the application of E. B .
Brown, owner of Lot 6 Block 4 Cocoplum Terrace Addition SubdiVi s ion, for a
variance to allow an upholstery shop at 6470 SW 62 Avenue be granted inas-
much as the rest of this block has C-2 and C-3 uses with current licens e s.
Polled -Yes 6
No 4 Corsiglia, Paden, Thaler, Foster
·;~·-:H:' ~:-:H:' -::··;H:-
Chairman Stanton then read the notice of the annual dinner and installati on
of officers of the SCFN,ZA. Mr. Kramer, Mr . Ferguson and Hr . Corsiglia
indicated that they would attend .
~HH:--:H:-':;:-'::HHi-
There being no further business, by motion p rop e rly made and seconded, the
meeting was adjourned at 9 :05 P .M.
By: /} .1. !tc~ e~Le/
J. L. Greene, Zo n ing Director
,r: " ..
L present :
Absent:
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING
BOARD, FEBFJARY 28, 1961, AT 8:00 P.M.
Jack Stanton, Chairman
Carl Paden, Vice Chairman
James Ferguson
Albert Corsiglia
Myron Keys
George Kramer
Thomas Foster
John Brau
Harold Yakely
J. L. Greene Ex Officio
R. 1!;. Rutledge
Leon Thaler
Mr. Corsiglia, seconded by Mr . Kramer, moved that the minutes o f the reg-
ular meeting of February 14, 1 961, be adopted as individually read.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously.
-iH:··::· -iHH:· -iHH:·
Chairman Stanton then read the notice of publi c hearing on the application
of W. F. Mendel , owner of Lot 82 University Park Subdivision, for a v ari -
ance of 15 feet on lo t fronta ge and 4000 square feet on lot size to allow
~ on struction of a conforming sin g le family residence.
The area of notification was 300 feet.
Mr . Mendel addressed the Board stating that he has owned this l ot for three
yea rs and desires to build a home for himself. All the lots in this sub-
division are 60 feet and the homes on either side of this lot are built
on 60 foot rrontage.
There were no objectors to this application.
BOARD'S ACTION ON PUB LI C HEARING
Re: W. F. Mendel
~l r. Fergus.on, seconded by Mr. Foster, moved that the Planning. and Zoning
Board recommend to the City Council that the application of W. F. Mendel,
owner of Lot 82 University Park Subdivision , for a variance of 15 feet on
lot frontage and 4000 square feet on l ot size to allow construction of a
conforming sin g le family residence be GRANTE D on the basis that this lot
and proposed build i n g c onform to the l o ts and bui l dings in this subdivi-
sion in general and it presents a case of simple hardship.
-i~ •• :: •• ::.
Polled -9 Yes o No
-iHH:· ~:·~H~
~Jha irman Stanton then read the notice of public hearing on the application
of E . K. Garvy, lessee and C . J. Lindgren , owner of W 115' of E 165' of
Tract 1 Larkins Fores t Subdivision for a variance on paving and drainage
of parking area to serve the proposed real estate office at 7400 Red Road.
The area of notification w~s 300 feet.
'-'
Planning and Zoning Board
City of South Hiami, Fla.
Gen tlemen:
February 10, 1961
I am attempting to open an office at above address and upon application
for a license have run into a complication which I knew nothing about.
This bein g an ordinance requiring sidewalks, cur bin g , paving and draina ge
before a license can be issued.
Since I am opening a Real Estate business and since the future plans o f
the landlord call for a modern office building to be erected on this site
on or before approximately one year from date, I ask for a variance or
special permit be allowed. My operation will be a small one and the
parking necessary would be no more than that required of a four adult
family. I intend to hire one or two sales people and hope to have a
client or two occasionally. There is a mp le room on the property which
runs 150' on Red Road and to a depth of 165' for the necessary vehicles
wi thout congestion.
Since my lease runs for a maximum of one year and since removal may be
obligated before that time it would simply not be feasible to spend the
many thousands of dollars required and then to rip up the area again for
'-' he new s truc ture •
This being a small home of about twenty years of age I promise to keep
the premises clean and in go od repair until such time as it shall be torn
down.
Your consideration will be greatly a p preciated.
Sincerely,
Bdward K. Garvy
Objectors:
Steve Hessen did not object to a temporary permit for one year but did
object to a variance o r extended exception.
A. C. Rifkin, representing the Cross Roads BUild i ng, objected to the
variance .
BOARD 'S ACTION ON PUBLIC HEARING
Re: E . K . Garvy
Mr. Kramer, seconded by Mr. Keys, moved that the Planning and Zoning Board
C ecommend to the City Council that the application of E. K . Garvy, lesse e
nd C . J. Lindgren, owner W 115' of E 165' of Tract 1 Larkins Forest Sub-
division for a variance on paving and drainage for parking area to serve
the proposed real estate office at 7400 Red Road be DENIED for the follow -
ing reasons:
-2-
... .
-;:--::.-::-
1. No hardship.
2 . Bad precedent .
Polled -9 Yes
o No
-:HH:-";HH:-
Mr. Paden, seconded by Hr . Corsi g lia, moved that the W. A . Hobbs Sub ... >';·
division app li cation for rezoning be re moved from the table for consider-
ation .
Polled -9 Yes
o No
Chairman Stanton then referred the matter to the P l anning Committee for
study and recommendation at the next regular me e ting of the Board.
-::--;~.-::--;H:--:.--;H:--::-
There being no further business befor e the Boar d , the meeting was adjourned
upon motion properl y made , duly seconded and carried at 9 :00 P.M .
By :
c / s/ Uctf Vile t ~
Carl Paden, Vice Chairman
..... -~ ..... ~
~
Q INUTES OF THE REGULAR NEE TTN G OF
THE SOUTH NIMH PLANNING AND ZONING
BOARD, NARCH 28, 1961, AT 8:00 P.N.
Present: Jack Stanton, Chairman
Carl Paden, Vice Chairman
Harold Yakely
James E. Ferguson, Jr.
Nyron Keys
John Brau
Albert Corsiglia
Leon Thaler
Thomas Foster
Ex Officio: J. L. Greene
Absent: R. E. Rutledge, Jr.
George Kramer
Mr. Paden, seconded by Mr. Corsiglia, moved that the minutes of
the regular meeting of February 28, 1961, be adopted as individually
read.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously.
Chairman Stanton then read the notice of public hearing on the
application of John L. Hawkes, owner of ,,/101.73' E 305' N~ of
Tract 14 Palm MiEmi Heights, for a variance on side setback to
allow construction of a garage.
The area of notification was 300 feet.
Mr. Hawkes presented a petition to the Board signed by four (4)
neighbors indicating approval of his request.
There were no objectors present.
BOARD'S ACTION ON PUBLIC HEARING
Re: John L. Hawkes
Mr. Thaler, seconded by Mr. Ferguson, moved that the Planning and
Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the application of
John L. HaWkes, owner of 1. 101.73' E 305' N! of Tract 14 Palm Niami
Heights, for a variance of 8" on side setback to allow construction
of a garage be granted as this minor variance will not be detrimen-
tal to the area. Location: 5930 SH 80 Street.
Polled -Notion carried unanimously.
·:HH" O):·o)H:·
Chairman Stanton then read the notice of public hearing on the
application of C. E. Ayers, prospective purchaser of Lots 6,7
·:HH:·
Block 3 Larkins Pines Sub for a Special Use Permit to allow the use
of an existing single family residence as an insurance agency office.
The area of notification was 300 fe e t.
-.
Mr. Ayers, prospective purchaser and Mr. Pyms, real estate agent
for owner, addressed the Board and presented a petition signed by
eight (8) adjacent property owners indicating approval of this
application.
Planning and Zoning Board
City of South Miami
6130 Sunset Drive
South Miami, Florida
Gentlemen:
March 8, 1961
Please be advised that the undersigned has a contract for the
purchase of the property loc ated at 7641 SW 62 Avenue . Said
contract is subject to the use of the property accommodating my
insurance agency, known as Ayers-Fryer Insurance Agency . It is
our intention to utilize the existing facilities for the purpose
of conducting a professional service in the form of insurance
sales and hereby apply through the attached application for a
special use permit to allow us to operate the insurance agency
from these premises .
By requesting this special use, I do not intend to seek a spot
zoning for general commercial use, but to utilize the present
property to what would be its highest and best use in accordance
vrith the commercial nature of the property directly opposite this
property. It is our further intention that when conditions permit ,
possibly within 12 to 18 months, to replace the present frame~
stucco building with a more attractive and modern professional
office similar to that located at 7500 S l1 57 AVenue presently
occupied by Fossey Real Estate, Proby and Edwards, Attorneys,
James Deen , Architect, and Martin Brothers, General Contractors.
I have filed under separate cover a petition signed by the ad-
joining property owners indicating their approval of the use of
this property for professional services.
I feel confident that upon careful consideration by the members
of the Planning and Zoning Board that they will agree that this
request is in order and in keeping with the progressive and
constantly changing growth pattern of the City of South Miami .
Sincerely
CEA/tw
Charles E . Ayers
A petition with twenty-four (24) signatures objecting to this
application was filed with the Board by a group of adjoining
residents.
-2-
'-
Ma rch 27 , 1 96
Mr. Jack Stanton, Chairman
S . Miami Planning and Zoning Board
MR . J. L . Gre ene, Zoning Di rector
City Ha ll, South Miami, Florida
Gentlemen:
The undersigned , owne rs and o c cupants of property adjacent and
neighboring to the singl e -fami l y residence at 7641 SW 62 Avenue
(Lots 6 ,7 Block j L a rkins Pine s Sub', he reby file object i o n t o
C . H. Ayers (and-a ny other persons) application f or a Special
U~e Pe r mi t (Commercial o r Professi onal) for this r es i dence as
an insurance agenc y (or any other sort of) office and/or busine ss.
The undersigned note that g r an t ing of this Special Use Permi t
wo u l d in e ff e ct accomplish the same purpose as the recent request
to spot -rezone this s ame propert y to C-l, a request prope rly and
just l y re je cted by the Zoning Board .
The undersi g ned furt he r aver it to be their c ontinuing wish that
this area be kept strictly residential and that the Zoning Board
be thanked for p r o t ect ing the undersigned interests by t he re-
jecting of previous applications f or altering in fact or in
effect the pre s ent R1T -l classification of the area in which the
above mentioned property is l ocated .
BOARD 'S ACTION ON PUBL IC HEMUNG
Re: C . E . Aye rs
Mr . Keys , seconded by Mr . Foster, move d that the P l anning and
Zoning Board recommend to the City Co uncil that the a pp licatio n
of C . E . Ayers , p r ospe ct ive purchaser of Lots 6 ,7 B l ock 3 Lark ins
Pines ~ubdivision for a Special Use Perm it to al low the use of
an existing s i ngle family residence as an insurance agency be
denied as this woul d be spot zoni ng , no hardship was s hown and
this could only l ead to further breakdown of zonin g in the area .
Pol l ed -l'1 otion carried unanimously .
-:~-::.-;:-~H:-~;--::-~:--::-
Ch a irman Stanton then read the notice of pub lic hearing on the
application of Paul Ca rter, owner o f Lots 21 through 24 Cooper s
Subdivis i on for a variance on alleyway s e t back to allow the c on -
struct ion of a 65 ' x 15' addition to the r ear of his e xist ing
building . This would be a 10' alleyway vari ance . L oca ti on :
5840 S . Dixie Hi ghw ay .
The a r ea of notification was 300 feet .
Mr . CRrt er add r essed the Board st ating that there is a building
that creates a dead end to the proposed alleyway to the west o f
h i s p ro pe rty , therefore e l iminating the use of an alleyway .
-3 -
"---'
Members of Zoning Board
Ci ty of South ~1iami
South Miami, Florida
To Whom It May Concern:
Paul Carter
5840 s . Dixie Highway
South Miami , F l orida
March 8 , 1961
I hereby submit the attached information, plans , etc . with
app l ication to build an addition to the rear of existing bui l ding
known as Speedy Laundry , located at 5840 S. Dixie Highway, South
Miami, F l orida, owned and operated by myself , Paul Carter.
The purpose of this addition is to g ive me additional space and
re l ieve me from a very cramped workin g area that now exists .
There will be no additional plumbing .. lork invo l ved , only to move
existing dryers into the addition so it will enable me to have
more working are a in a safe manner .
Any further information you may wish , I will be glad to furnish .
Respectfully yours ,
Paul Carter
The proposed alleyway plan prepared for the City of South Miami
by Charles Davenport , land surveyor, dated February 15 , 1958 for
this block of Coopers Subdivision was examined by the Board at
this time .
Mr . Carter submitted a letter from Mr . ~tang .
Zoning Board vs Paul Carter
I do not object to addition to rear of laundry l ocated on
Lots 22,23,24 .
The proposed alley o f several years a g o did not provide for a
drive through and woul d become a dead end .
Omar Stang
March 27, 1961
There were no objectors present.
BOARD 'S ACTI ON ON PUBLIC BE AR I NG
Re : Paul Carter
Mr . Foster , seconded by Mr . Brau, moved that the Planning and
Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the app l ication
-4-
-
CI
v
r"'.
of Paul Ca r ter , owner o f Lots 21 through 2Lf Coopers Subdivis i on
f or a tota l variance of ten (1 0) fee t on a l leyway setback to
allow construction of a 65 ' x 15' addition to the rear of his
existing building be approved subject to his plans conforming
to the p r oposed alleyway plan dated February 15, 19 5e . Locat i on :
5840 South Dixi e Hi ghway .
~HH:-
Polled -8 Yes
1 No Hr . Paden indicated he voted "no"
because he believes the code for a lley -
ways is definite and specifi c and i f
variances on al l eyways are to be granted
they should c onform to a predetermined
p l an Qns t ead of a plan Wh ich has a n i n -
definite status .
-:HH:--:HH:-
The Plannin g Committee indicated that they are working with the
att o rney for the property owners of v.I . A . Hobbs Subdivision .
~H:--;:--:HH :--;:--::--;:-
The Zoning Committee has under consi d eration a new 7,one c l assifi -
cation desi gnated as P -l and requested that thi s item be on the
a ge nda at the next meeting fo r ge nera l discus si on .
-:~-;:--;:--;:-..;:--::--:HH:-
There being no furth e r bus ine ss before the Board , the me eting
was adj ourned UD o n motion properly made, duly sec onded and carried
at 9:15 P .H .
By: jt ~<<-EJ
J . L . Greene
Zoning Director
''''
'---'
MINUTES OF THE ~GULAR MEETING OF V
THE SOUTH MIAl-UPLANNING AND ZONING .
BOARD, MAY 9, 19 1, AT CITY HALL A ·
8:00 P.M.
'\
Present: Jack Stanton, Chairman
Carl Paden, Vice Chairman
Myron Keys
Harold Yakely
George Kramer
Thomas Foster
Albert Corsiglia
Ex Officio: J. L . Greene
Ao sent: R. E. Rutledge, Jr.
James E. Ferguson, Jr.
Leon Thaler
John Brau
-:HH;-~Hh,~-~HH~
Mr. Paden, seconded by Mr. Corsiglia, moved that ~t_he" minutes of the
regular meeting of March 2 ~, 1961 be adopted as individually read.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously.
-:HH~-~HH~ ~HH:-
"
Mr. Foster, seconded by Mr. Kramer, moved that the Planning and Zoning
Board recommend to the City Council that the final plat of CORINNE
ESTATES Subdivision (tentative plat submitted as Pinder Subdivision and
approved by Resolution 1483 on April 5, 1960) be approved insofar as
zoning is concerned.
~HH:-
Polled -7 Yes o No
~HH~ ~HH:-
Mr. Paden, Chairman of the Zoning Committee, reported that the Zoning
Committee, has under consideration a proposed SPECI AL ZO NING USE cate-
gory to apply to certain problem areas along arterials. This will be
presented to the Board at the next regular meeting of May 30, 1961.
~HH~ ~HH~--;~-;:~:-
Chairman Stanton read a letter from Mr. R. W. Gardner of 7871 SW 69
Avenue requesting the South Miami Planning and Zoning Board to file an
objection to the requested change of zoning from RU-3 to RU-4 on the
property in Dade County adjacent to South Miami. NE corner of SW 80
Street and SW 69 Avenue.
~ After due conSideration, the Board voted unanimously to recommend to
the City Council that a formal objection be filed by the South Miami
Planning and Zoning Board to the Dade County Zoning Board on the appli-
cation of R. H. Sykes for a change of zoning from RU-3 to RU-4.
L
'---
Locati on : NE corner o f SW 80 Street and SW 69 Avenue.
·:HH:· ~HH:--:HH:-
There being no further business, by motion properly made and seconded,
the meeting was adjourned at 9 :00 P .M.
By: fft!JLeMU-J
J. IY. Greene , Z o ning Director
· "--
c
~
-'--
Present:
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING
BOARD, JULY 25, 1961, AT CITY HALL
AT 8:00 P.M.
Jack Stanton, Chairman
Carl Paden, Vice Chairman
John Brau
James E. Ferguson, Jr.
George Kramer
Myron Keys
Harola-Yakely
Albert Cor s iglia
C. R. Gibbs
Thomas. Foster
R. E. Rutledge, Jr.
Ex. Officio: J. L. Greene
~H:·';~ " ., .. ~.--:...., .. <{HH~
Mr. Paden, seconded by Mr. Rutledge, moved that the minutes of the
regular meeting of June 13, 1961 be a pproved as read.
Polled -Motion carried una nimously.
~HS~ ~HH~ ~H}-~·
Chairman Stanton then read the notice of Public Hearing on the app-
lication of Marian B. Lee, owner and James G. Stewart, agent for, of
Lots 17, 33 & 34 of w. A. LARKINS SUBDIVISION for a variance of .19
off street parking apaces t o a llow construction of a thre.e stOL"Y
c.ommercial building to be used as stores, officea, lounge, ste:ak
house and coffee shop.
Location : 5864 Sunset Drive.
The area of notification was 300'. One letter was received by the
Board in favor of this application and one letter expressing ob-
jection if off street parking were allowed facing Sunset Drive •.
(Plot Plan indicates. all parking to rear of building.)
(Following is letter from applicant)
South Miami Planning and Zoning Board
City Hall
S outh Miami, Flor ida
Gentlemen:
I hereby make application for a public hearing on Lots 17, 33 & 34 w. A. Larkins Subdivision located at 5864 Sunset Drive.
," ...........
The subject property is owned by Marian B. Lee and 'sh~ is des:irbus
to build on the property., prov.iding she can get all ne'c'essar.Yl'miv-
ers and or variances needed to erect this building. If there is
enough interest created in this building, she intend:s to haveatore8
and offices and also have a lounge, steak house, and cOl'feee'hop.
Since there is not enough parking space on the property, weare re'-
questing a waiver or variance for off street parking. We do have
one great advantage aathe City ps:,:::::':cg lot on 73rd Street is Just
across from our lot. Since the restaurant and lounge would be op~
erating after the stores and offices have closed, we feel confident
that there would be ample parking to cover the necessary requiremen+-'
Mrs. Lee, my mother-in-law, has given me the authority to act in her
behalf and I request a hearing at your earliest convenience~
Very truly yours,
James G. Stewart
Several property owners in the area were present and expressed app-
roval of this application as presented.
There were no objectors present.
BOARD'S ACTION ON PUBLIC HEARING
~ '-J Re: Marian B. Lee and James G. Stewart
L
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Rutledge, moved that the Planning and
Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the application of
Marian B. Lee, owner and James G. Stewart, agent for, of Lota 17,
33 & 34 w. A. LARKINS SUBDIVISION for a variance of 39 off street
parking spaces to allow construction of a three story commercial
building to be used as stores, offices, lounge, steak house and
coffee shop, be approved inasmuch as there is a City owned parking
lot adjacent to this property.
T,,.,,,,,,,tion: 5864 Sunset Drive.
Polled -10 yea
1 abstained (Ferguson)
Chairman Stanton then read the notice of p~blic hearing on the app-
lication of Jerry Montgomery, owner Lots 5 & 6 Block 4 PINES SUB-
DIVISION, for a variance of 675 square feet on lot area to allow
construction of a conforming single family residence.
Location: 6143 S.W. 62nd Terrace.
The area of notification was 300;. One letter was received by the
Board objecting to this variance on the grounds that this use does
not agree with the proposed "Master Pl£'n". (The Master Plan pro-
poses garden type apartments.)
..,:?
'-~"--"""
::... '-'
c
(Following is letter from applicant)
Planning and Zoning Board of South Miami
6130 Sunset Drive
South Miami, Florida
Dear Sirs:
We, the owners of Lots 5 & 6 Block 4 Pines Subdivision, respect-
fully request whatever variances are necessary to allow us to build
a single family residence for our own use on this property.
Very truly yours,
Jerry Montgomery
The applicant was not present. There were no objectors present.
BOARD'S ACTION ON PUBLIC HEARING
Re: Jerry Montgomery
Mr. Ferguson, seconded by Mr. Brau, moved that the Planning and
Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the application
of Jerry Montgomery, owner Lots 5 & 6 Block 4 PINES SUBDIVISION
for a variance of 675 square feet on lot area to allow construc-
tion of a conforming single famiily residence be approved.
Location: 6143 S.W. 62nd Terrace.
Polled -9 yes
2 no (Keys -Corsiglia)
Mr. Corsiglia voted no because the applicant was not
present.
NOTE: Resolution 1459 dated Feb. 16, 1960 granted variance to
MARBARAL DEVELOPMENT CO. on this property, however application for
Building Permit was not applied for.
-3B~ ?~~Ht-~-."}
There being no further business, by motion properly made and secon-
ded, the meeting was adjourned at 8:30 P.M.
-3-
• ()
MINUTE V OF THE REGULAR i'lEETING OF
THE SOUTH MIAHI PLANNING AND ZONING
BOARD, AUGUST 29, 1961, AT CITY HALL
AT 8:00 P.M.
'--Pre sent: Jack Stanton, Chairman
Carl Paden, Vice Chairman
John Brau
Absent:
Albert Corsiglia
James E. Ferguson, Jr.
Thomas T. ,r 'oster
Myron Keys
Geoz'ge Kramer
R. ~. Rutledge, Jr.
Harold Yak ely
C. R. Gibbs
None
Ex Officio: J. L. Greene
Mr. Corsiglia, seconded by Mr. Gibbs, moved that the minutes of the
regular meeting of July 25, 1961 be approved as read.
Polled -Notion carried unanimously.
~Hh~-
Chairman Stanton then read the notice of public hearing on the appli-
~)ation of Ignatius L. Ferry, owner of Lot 21 Block 3 Bird Road Estates,
for a variance of 24 feet on lot frontage and 4,900 square feet on lot
size to allow the construction of a conforming single family residence.
Location: 6331 S v! 42 Street.
The area of notification was 300 feet. There were no letters of ob-
jection. One letter was received expressing approval.
Planning and Zoning Board
City of South Miami, Florida
July 31, 1961
Re: Public Hearing
Lot 21 Block 3
Bird Road Estates
Owner requests use of above lot. Homes at 6321 and 6339 Sri 42 Street
are built on either side of this lot. It is the only vacant lot left
in this block.
This request conforms, in all respects, with existing conditions of
neighborhood and also with the original intent of platting and zoning.
The owner requests merely, the lots use for a single family residence
which will comply with all existing restrictions and setback requirements
of the Ci ty of South Hiami.
L· Chris borg, Agent for
Ignatius L. Ferry
Mr. 'Bo rg, authorized repre sentative, addre ssed the Boar d indicating that
the proposed building would compare esthetically with the surroundin g
homes.
~:here were no objectors present.
BOA RD'S ACTION ON PUBLIC HEARING
Re: I g natius L. Ferry
Mr. Rutled ge , seconded by Mr. Paden,moved that the Planning and Zoning
Board recommend to the City Council that the a p pl i cation of I gnatius L.
Ferry, owner of Lot 21 Block 3 Bird Road Estates, for va riances of 24 f eet
on lot fronta ge and 4,900 square feet on lot size be g ranted inasmuch
as there is a residence on e ither side on the same size l ot s and that
this reque s t is consistent with the g eneral patt e rn existing in the area.
Loca tion : 6331 SVJ 42 q tre e t.
-:~.~: ; .. ::-
Polled -11 Yes o No
Ch a irman Stanton then read the notice of public hearing on the applica -
tion of Levco Rea lty, Inc., owners of E 48 ' of Lo t 7 All of Lots 10,11
the W 10' o f Lot 12 S 20' of Lo ts 25,26,27 & 28 and W 10' of S 15' of
Lot 29 Co op ers Subdivision , for a vari ance o f 20 f ee t on front setback
to allow construction of a store building 30 f ee t from the center line
of Sunset Drive . Loc a tion: 5A19 Sunset Drive.
~'he ar ea of notification was 3 00 fe et . There were no letters of obje ct-
ion from adjacent property own ers.
Planning and Zoning Board
City of South ~liami, Florida
Gentlemen:
Au g ust 8 , 1961
The undersi g ned is desirous of e rect ing a store buildin g on the subject
property front ing o n Suns e t Drive . We need a variance fr om the present
setback r equirements i n order that the front of our store building will
be in a line with the p resent prope rty to the east . We are wi lling t o
dedicate 20 fe e t of the rear of our p r ope rty to be use d f o r ingress
and egress.
Ve ry truly yours,
David Levine, P resident
Levco Realty , Inc.
The a p plicant, Mr. Levine , indicated that the full 50 foot setback wou ld
place the front of h is pro p osed buildi ng so far back from the existing
building s that this wou ld force a hardship and eliminate his building
~,t t h is time .
There were n o objectors present.
-2-
,
• BOA'ID' S ACTION ON PUPLIC HF¥U NG
He: Levco Realty, Inc.
Mr . Kramer, seconded by Mr . 0;orsiglia, moved that the Planning and Zoning
'oard recommend to the City Council that the application of Levco Realty ,
nc ., owners of E 48' of Lot 7 and all of Lots 10,11 the W 10' of Lot 12
" 20' of Lots 25,26,27 &. 28 and ~I 1 0 ' of S 15' of Lot 29 Coopers Sub-
division , for a variance of 20 foot front setback to allow construction
of a store building 30 feet from the cent er line of Sunset Drive be
granted because precedent has been established immediately adjacent to
this property and on the east to Red Road. Location: 5819 Sunset Drive .
~HH:·
Polled -8 Yes
3 No Ferguson, Keys and Brau
Mr . Ferguson indicated that both sides of Sunset
Drive should be the same width in order that every-
one would be treated equal.
Chairman Stanton then read the notice of public hearing on the appli-
cation of S. Shore Properties , Inc., prospective purchaser of Lots 4,5,6
Messer Hanor Subdivision, for a Specia l Use Permit to allow construction
of a two story profes sional office building . Locati on: 7550 S\1 57 Avenue
The area of notification was 300 feet. One letter of obje cti on was
received by the Board.
'--lanning and Zoning Board
6 1 30 Sunset Drive
South Miami , Florida
Gent lemen :
August 8 , 1961
Request is hereby made for a chang e of zone on Lots 4,5,6 Hesser Manor
from RU-l to a zone which wi ll allow the erection of a professional
building with adj acent parking.
The undersigned wishes to erect a two story office building on the
described premises, the same not being a permitted use under the exist-
ing zoning deSignation. As can be seen from the proposed elevation and
parking layout, the building will be a modern two story office building
of a colonial design. This is in perfect keepinG with t he character of
the adjoining property and would undoubtedly enhance the entire area.
Very truly yours ,
S. SHORE PROPERTIE S, INC.
By: Martin I. Mondluk , Treas.
MD1: stg
~L r. Joseph Chusmir of S . Shores Properties, Inc. presented to the Board
artist renderings of two similar buildings erected recently in other
areas of the county and indicated that his firm would erect a beautiful
professional building if this use is granted.
-3-
The;e w e ~e several objecto rs present from the Red Road =Sunset Drive
business area of South Hiarni and their obje cti ons are reflected in the
follow i ng l etter:
\...-Au g ust 2 9 , 1 96 1
The Honorab l e , the Members of the Planning
and Zoning Board of the City of ~outh N iami
City Ha ll, South Hiami , F l orida
TI e: Statement of Avron C . Rifkin
re g ard j.n g a p plicatio ns of
Kenneth Bastho l m and Shore Prop -
erties, Inc.
We are op p osed to the requests c ontaine d in the Kenneth Bastholm and
·Shore Properties , Inc., applications for P -l z o ning and the constructi o n
of professional buildings Vli thout provisions for gr ound floor st ore s.
We stro ngly f ee t that the g rantin g of such a p plications will b l ock the
g rowth of the business are a of S o uth Niami . Requests , su c h as the one
made in these app l ications s e rve no p urp ose t o an expanding mercant i le
are a such as the area cente ri ng ar o und the interse cti o n df Red Ro a d and
Sunset Drive . \-I E ~1US T HAV E MORE S T O n E ~ TO GRO I,!. The City of S o uth Niami
has shown considerable foresi g ht in setting out a mast e r p l an for the
orderl y g rovlth o f the c ommunity and He find ourse l ves on the threshold
of a new u l anned era. lie h ave the op p o rtunity now to creat e a thriving
and di p:nified business ar e a in S o uth fl iami. Ap p l ications, such as t ho se
requested here, only serve to s e t back , in time , this opportunity.
He althy b u sines s dev e l opment is of major i mportance to every taxpayer in
I ",he community. It share s the s e rvice costs t o ee,c h home in addition t o
'-p ayi ng for a ll the services it require s . E x istin g business areas ,
deve loped as they were without benefit of mu ch p l anning , are now not
able without help to pr ov ide the fact o rs which are being designed i nto
new pl a nned shop p i n g centers . Skillful desi g ners of the planned shop -
p i ng cente r s have made careful studies of the factors which wil l (1 )
attract the most customers, and (2) induce them to return fo r a ll future
shop ping needs .
The f oremos t requisit e of s h oppin g center desi g n is the prope r dive r sity
of business uses. The ri ght c om bination of businesses wi ll attract
many more customers than any one business alone c o u l d hop e to attract .
The existing South ~1 iarni business center is alrea d y competing with new
planned s hopping centers . Further development of t h is kind will provide
more and more comp et i tion . .f e s ugr:est that South Hiami active l y compete
by capitalizing on its p r e s e nt assets and q u ickl y pr o vide the thing s it
now l acks , to wit : additi o na l store s on Red Road . Such steps will p r o v e
to be of la sting value to every busin ess and property owne r and t o every
o t her property owne r in the S o uth Hiam i area .
If we a r e to compete with the Ke ndall, Perrine and Dade l and business
areas , we mu st have e. c ontinuity of stores so as to create a ma r ketpl a ce
with a n opportunity for c omp aris o n shop p ing . If g rowth of our store
area stops , then Da d eland , Kend all and P errine w ill p rogress and g rovT
l arger and strong er at o ur exp ense wh i l e we rema i n d ormant . OUR HASTE R
C "L AN MUST INCLUDE I"ORE ST ORE S S 01TT H OF SUNSET DRIV E ALONG RED ROAD .
In addition , we a g ain p r o p o se that the City of S outh i'liami cre a te an
Architectural Contro l Board to sup ervise the aesthetics of c onstur c tion
and the aesthetics of u s a g e o f o l de r buildings so as to govern develo p -
-4-
~
• ment' of our community tmvaC improvement, rather than m the opposite
direction .
'·le further recommend that the City of South ll iami should insist that
"wners o f new commercial construction provide a 20 foot alleyway at
,-~he rear of commercia l construction for the convenience of loading , un-
l oading and garbage collection activities .
Respectfully submitted,
CROSSROADS PROP E RTIES
ACR :mb
BOA !ill , ,", ACTION ON PUBLIC Hl:A RI NG
Re : S . Sho res P roperties , Inc .
Avron C . Rifkin
Hr . Keys , seconded by Hr . Brau , moved that the application of S . Shores
Propert i e s , Inc . b e tabled until such time as the City Council consi de rs
the Board's proposed amendment to the Zoni ng Ordinance affecting this
type of use .
.::-.:.~.::-
PoJ.led 1 1 Yes ° No
~hai rman Stanton then read the notice of publi c hearing
~ation of Kenneth H . Bastholm , owner of the E 137 .5 ' of
Forest Subdivision, for a Specia l Use Permi t to al l ow a
off ice building in an existing si ngle family residence .
745 0 sw 57 Avenue .
on the appli-
Tract 4 Larkins
professional
Location:
The area o f notification was 300 feet. No letters of objection were
received by the Board .
P lanning and Zoning Board
South Hiami , Florida
CB'ent l emen:
!;.ugust 7, 1 96 1
The following data has been compiled, using the Dade Co unty RU -5 prof-
essional office district zoning requirements as a guide .
I rea l ize South ll iami does not have the RU -5 type zoning , but I think
this is the type zoning South t !iami is interested in for the area in-
vol ved .
Ninimum l ot width
11i.nimum l ot area after
1edication of 25 feet
'---
Front , after dedication
Lot Size Required
75 ft .
1 0 ,000 ft .
P rincipal Se nbacks
25
-5-
Have
9 1 f t.
1 0,243 f't .
<15 .12
18 .70
•
North side (74 Terr .)
"'.',outh side
--r1ear
Parking
P roviding 1 c ar space o f
10 x 20 for each 325 sq . ft .
of office area . (A 159 1)
rtequired
15 f eet
10
25
5 spaces
o
Have
/15.2
-'" 21.2
22 .7 9
51.0
9 spaces
Type Building
Required and is residential in exterior a p pearance and of masonry con-
struction , without store fronts or display windows .
Yours truly ,
~enneth A . Bastho l m
Dr . Bastholm a d dres sed t he Boa r d s ta ting that he has owned thi s proper ty
for yea~s and has planned t o use t ~is residence as an office ano that in
his opinion the us e i s in keeping 1-lith the area . He further reque~ted a
variance of 1 0 feet on front setback . P. oetition with signatures of six
property owners expressin p" aporoval Has submitted by Dr. Bastho l m .
~ 'here were several objectors present fro m the Re e. Road -Suns et Drive
'-ousiness area of S outh Miami and their objections were the same as for
the S . ~ho r es Proper ties , Inc . (See letter above).
BOA RD'S ACTI ON ON P UBLIC HEA '~I F G
Re: Dr . Kenneth A . Bastholm
~~r . Corsi g li a , sec onded b y Nr. Fos t e r, moved to table the a pplication of
Kennety A . Bastho l m until the City Counc il considers the Board 's amend -
ment to the Zoning Ordinance affecting thi s type of use .
·::··:H:·
Polled -11 Yes o No
Chairman Stanton then read the notice of publi c hearing on the appl i-
cation of John J . and Sara H . Root , owners of the S 200 ' of the 1rJ 185 ' of
the 101 264 ' of the st of swi ~H ' st11; Section 2!~-5L~-40 less N 60 ' Sf the
W 200 ' there of and subject to road dedication o f record, for a c hange
of zonin g fr om RU -1 to C-2 or S»ecial U Be I'ermi t to allow c ons truction
of a service s tat ion . L ocation NE c orner Sh' 67 Avenue and :-',,1 56 '>t re e t.
The area of n o tification was )(10 feet . The Board received seve ral let -
te r s of objection .
\....-
-6 -
•
August 11, 196 1
,--·l ann ing & Zoning Board
City of South r1i a mi, Florida
Re: Application of John J .
and Sarah L. Ro ot
Gentlemen:
This application covers property owned by the applicants and
si tua t ed at the northeast corner of SW 67 Avenue and SW 56 ·"tree t .
This parcel is presently z one d RU -l. The cha racter of the nei ghborhood
has be c ome such a s t o t o t a lly n ega te the possibilities for utilization
u n de r present z one classifi c a tion . On the northwest and southwest
c o rners of t hi.s i n tersection are situated P u r e Oil and Cities Service
fillin g stations r e s p ectively . Variou s other commercial uses are
lo cated in the area i mmediately s u rrounding the western portion of the
interse ction .
It is propo se d by the applicants t o s e ll a 150 f oo t corn er parc e l to
the Sun Oi l Co mp a ny whi ch i n turn oroposes to construct a mo d e rn attrac -
tive service station at tha t l o c a tion .
Y ou rs very tru ly ,
'r'RTbg
No nra d R . Thue , Jr .
Mr . Thue , attorney for applicants, di recte d the Board's attention to
the fact that t wo service stat io ns on opposite corners, plus other c om -
mercial use change s the characte r istics of this area and forces a
a h ardsh ip on the owners of this p roperty as presently zoned .
There were 2 0 to 30 property owne rs from this area p resent objecting
t o the g ranti ng of a change of zonin g at this l ocation for the f o llowing
reasons:
1 . Spot zO i li ng has a tende n c y to lower property values .
2 . This ar ea al r eady has t wo service stations and any additional
si milar bu s inesses coul d create economical p roble ms .
3 . Zoning f o r this kind of business would make an unsi ghtly
appearance and r edu ce the sere nity of a l ong established
residential area .
4 . The environment crea ted by these kinds of businesses is not
conducive to rear ing families and maintaining home like at -
mospheres .
5. A mod ern and p ro g ress ive city must c onsider the interests of
the majority of residents in the area . It is o u r desire to
see the rezoning a pplicati o n denied .
L )OJl."D' q ACTION ON PUBL IC HF:A RI )TG
Re: Joh n J . ~ S a ra H. Root
Mr . Gibbs, seconded by Mr . Keys , moved that the P lanning and Zoning
Board recommend to the City Council that the application of John J.
-7-
,
and ';ara H . Root , owners of S 200' of the ill 185' o f the W 264' of the S~
Sl.t ShTt swt Section 24 -5h-40 less N . 60' of' the W 200' thereof' and sub-
·ect to roa d dedication of record, for a chan ge of zoning from RU -l to
~-l or Special Use Permit to allow the constructi on of' a service station
on this property be denied because this application does not c omp ly
with Ordinance 425 limiting distances between service stati o ns (750').
Sect i on 20 -5 6 (F) of' t he Zonin g Code doe s not conform to the p r opo sed
Haster p lan and this woul d not serve the best interest of the citizens
in the area involved .
Polled -11 Yes
o No
No te : It was noted by the Board that the citizens of t h is area turned
out in force objectin g to this application .
·:HH.
Co ~m i ttee Repor ts
The pro posed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance eRtablishing a new class -
ific a tion designated as RU -5 was consid ered at this time .
Mr. Rrau , seconded by Hr . Corsi g lia, mo ved that the Planning and Zoning
Board submit to the City Council this propo sed ordinance (RU -5) as
amended for their consideration . (qee -attached copy.
Pol led -}1o tion carri e d unanimously •.
~e ction 20 -4. of the Zoning Cod e was c on sidered by the Board for recom-
mendation t o the City Council for revision .
Hr . Brau , seconded by Mr . Yakely , moved that the P lanning and Zoning
Board recommend to the City Council that Section 20 -4 of the Zonin g Code
be amended as su g ge sted in at tached copy .
Po lled -11 Yes
o No
There bein g no f'urther bu siness, by motion p r operly made and seconded ,
the meeting was a djourned at 1 0:00 P . M.
By : J2, t ~co 7 c»
J:~ Greene, Zoning Director
c
~
,
'-
-
CHAPTER 20.
ZON -NG
ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL.
~HH .. ~i--:H:-
Sec. 20-4. Zoning, use, occupancy and hearing reese
In addition to the fees required for licenses set out in
the license tax schedule Section 13-58 building, electrical,
plumbing and other permits, as provided in Chapter 7 and by
other ordinances, regulations and laws, the following zoning,
use, occupancy and hearing rees shall be required:
(1) Application for public hearing before Planning and
Zoning Board, ~;;20 .00.
(2) Change of occupant or use inspection fee, ~.'lO.n O.
Owners of two or more adjoining lots may sign the same
application for a public hearing for a similar or related
purpose and pay only one fee for the hearing.
The City Council may waive payment of
applications from public, charitable or
zations or ot ~er bodies and groups when
interest to do so.
~HH:-~H:-~:-
PRO POSED
hearing fees wi th
religious organi-
deemed in the public
·;~·:H:-
Sec. 20-4. Zoning, use, occupancy and hearing fees.
In addition to the rees required for licenses set out
in the license tax schedule Section 13-58 building, electri-
cal plumbing or other permits, as proviaed in Chapter 7 and
by other ordinances, regulations and laws, the following
zoning, use, occupancy and hearing fees shall be required:
(1)
(2)
Application fOf public hearing before Planning and
Zoning Board, ~~30 .00.
Chan ge of occupant or use inspection fee, ~:i l.OO.
Owners of two or more adjoining lots may sign the same
application for a public hearin g for a similar or related
purpose and pay only one fe e for the hearing.
The City Co uncil may waive paym e nt of hearing fees with
applications from public, charitable or religious organi-
zations or other bodies and groups when deemed in the public
interest to do so.
r-
\
-~
Preamble to the Honorable l'layor and City Council
~t is our opinion after long and exhaustive study that a different
type of zoning from anything we now have is necessary in certain
areas of our city. He have atteMpted to come UP with a recommenda-
tion for this different type of Buffer Qtrip Zoning in the follow-
ing recommendation. It is our considered opinion that this type
of zoning is the least objectionable of the many tynes which Vie
have checked, particularly to the adjacent property owners. The
buildings should present a pleasing homelike appearance vii th land-
scaped grounds, adequate parking and a wall between the -orofessional
zone and the adj acent home s. As a ['.eneral rule there is no busines s
permitted that will be open at night. However, we are not recommend-
ing the restriction of night use of the buildings but are Tecommending
a highly re,~tricted list of professional uses. As everyone knows
the u"es recoll1Jl1ended do not normally vJOrk at night. "Ie haye been in-
formed that this tvpe of zoning has been used successfully in other
cities in marginal areas where the neighbors do not want liberal
business and where no one would lil;ce to build a home and live in it.
A. Description of Area /
B. Property designated as Ru-5 -Residential-Professifonal Office Dist.
Permi tted uses. The zoning of this property henCE?forth, shall
be Ru-5; that the present existing residential bV1ldings on
this property shall not be remodeled, reconstrucjted or structur-
ally altered for RU-5 usage unless they are brought up ~o the
South Florida BuiJ.ding Code in every respect; tf1at any building
shall not be used or occupied for any purpOse ~hless otherwise
provided for, except for one or more of the fo ttowing"1;U3ages:
-' ! . \.,
(1)
(2)
(J)
(~ )
(5 )
(6 )
(7 )
(8)
( 9 )
(10)
(11 )
(12)
(13)
(1l, )
(lS)
(16 )
(17 )
(lB)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28 )
(29)
(30 )
(31)
(32)
(33 )
(4)
(5)
(36 )
(37)
(')8 )
(39 )
(40)
(Lfl)
(~2)
Duplex dwelling I',,,,
Apartment house (Three or more families, depending
on available lot area)
Abstract title ~
Accountants-bookkeeping
Actuaries
Advertising (No shops)
Adjusters (Insurance)
Aerial survey and photogranhy
/
/,/
Appraisers-no sale or rental of any type of merchandise
or equipment
Architects
Attorneys
Auditors
Business analysts-counselors or broker'S
Building contractors, office only (No shops or storage)
Chiropodists
Chiropractors
Consulates
Counseling, child guidance and family service
Court reporter, public stenographer
Credit reporting
Dentist
Detective agencies and investigating service
Drafting and plan service
Engineers, professional
Insurance and bonds
}'1anufacturers agents
Harket research
Hedical doctors
Model agencies (No school)
Hortgage broker
Notary public
Optician
Optometrist
Public libraries
Public relations
Real estate
Real estate management
Secretarial service
Shoppers information service
Social service bureau
Stock broker exchange-investment
Tax consultants
service
~
(43) Telephone answering service
(44)"Theater ticket agencies
(45) Travel agencies
(46) Zoning consultants
Any other business or part thereof which requires professional
or administrative workmen only.
If use not listed in above list permit to be approved by Zoning
Board and City Council only.
C. Prohibited Uses
Any business of a retail or similar nature.
D. Hinimum Lot Size
Tentative nlats for subdividing accompaning applications for this
use shall show a minimum width of RO feet and a minimum depth
of 150 feet.
On existing platted property the lTIl.nHrrum width shall be 100 feet
and the denth as platted. (NOTE: In areas where the Board recom-
mends and the Council approves as logical for this zoning classi-
fication it will he found that eXisting platted lots vary in
width and denth so as to make it impracticable to use one indi vi-
dual or even" two lots in most instances.)
E. Type of Building Permi. tted -Area and Height of Buildings
Residential in exterior appearance, of masonry construction and
not more than two stories high.
Hinimum Area of Building:
(1) Office building -1000 square feet
(2) Duplex building -See Chapter 20-19 (4) Zoning Code
(3) Anartmen ts -f;ee Chapter 20-20 (2) Zoning Code
(4) Combination office residential -1500 square feet
Haximum height not to exceed 2L f feet above finished grade.
No accessory buildings will be -oermitted.
F. 11aximum Lot Coverage
No maximum
Shall comply wi th all setbacks and off-street parking requirements.
G~ Hinimum Setbacks
Front shall be 25 feet
Side shall be 10 foot mlnlmum
Rear shall be 25 foot minimum
~id€ street -15 feet
H. Oi'f-f;trect Parking -Each space (10 x 20' )
Confined to side and rear only, there shall be no parking in front
of front building line. One car space for each 350 square feet of
floor space. Shall be paved and drained with ingress and egress.
I, Landscaping
The property shall be appropriately landscaped from the building
to the sidewalk.
A mlnlmum of Lf feet or a maximum of <; feet-concrete louvered fence,
or masonry wall (painted) on rear property line and around all
parking areas.
J" Sidewalks
Sidewalks, curbs, gutters and drainage shall be required.
.. '
c .
c
"'-'
--
".
'-'oi g ns
Pro h i b ited
Permitted
-E lectric o r Ne o n
-One si g n 2' x 3' mo unted flat on building wall at
8 ' to top of sign.
'.
MnC ES OF THE REGULAR MEETING'
OF THE SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND
ZONING BOARD, SEPTEMBER 26, 1961,
AT CITY HALL AT 8:00 P.H.
L Present: Carl Paden, Vice Chairman
James E. Ferguson, Jr.
John Brau
c
c
Absent:
Sidney Efronson
Albert Corsiglia
Myron Keys
Harold Yakely
R. E. Rutledge, Jr.
C. R. Gibbs
Jack Stanton, Chairman
Thomas T. Foster
Ex Officio: J. L. Greene.
Mr. Rutledge, seconded by Hr. Yakely, moved that the minutes of the
regular meeting of ~eptember 12, 1961 be approved as read.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously.
-:HH;-
Chairman Paden then read the notice of ~ublic hearin~ on the appli-
cation of John Pecora, owner of W 210' of NWt NWt NW4 NWt Section
25-5~-40, for a change of zoning from RU-l to C-2 to allow the con-
struction and use of a gasoline service station. Location: SE cor-
ner of SW 67 Avenue and SW 56 Street.
The area of notification was 300 feet. Several letters of objection
were received by the Board.
Planning and Zoning Board
City of South Hiami
South Hiami, Florida
Dear Sirs:
August 30, 1961
Re: SE Corner of Ludlum Road
and }Uller Drive, South
Hiami, Florida
Mr. John Pecora has appointed me his representative in this rezoning
matter presently pending before the City of South ~1iami.
The reasons for making this request are as follows:
1. Hr. Pecora has owned and been paying taxes on this property for
~any years. He did not purchase the property to speculate, he
intended to build a home on this property. Shortly after purchasing
yhe property it became obvious that the traffic flow was too great
~
_v
for residential use.
2. For the past five years Mr. Pecora has attempted to find a sat-
isfactory use for the property. He has not had one single offer for
for any use for the property other than for a gasoline service station.
This, despite his sincere and continuous efforts.
3. The first part of this year Mr. Pecora fell and broke his foot and
has been unable to work since. Due to the heavy medical bills and the
stopping of his income due to his injury, his financial position is
serious. He can no longer continue to pay taxes on a property which
the City of South r1 iami has not rezoned to a use which will enable
him to dispose of the property or at least gain some return en his
investment.
4. ~everal times in the past five years Mr. Pecora has had informal
talks with officials of the City of ~outh Hiami and was told each
time that rezoning was out of the question. This attitude on the
part of the City has placed him in a position of having to con-
tinue to pay for something which he cannot utilize.
5 . Ludlum Road is the dividing line between Dade County and the City
of South Niami. The County has allowed two service stations on their
corners across Ludlum Road. One of these is right across Ludlum Road
from the subject pro perty. This certainly makes the subject property
unfit for residential use for there is no way of buffering between the
p roperties.
6. Mr. Pecora has now decided to make this application hoping the
City of South Miami will be understanding and reasonable in consider-
in g all of the factors involved.
7. The Atlantic Refining Company has contracted to purchase the
~r operty subject to obtaining proper zoning. This company is a major
o il company who maintains clean well built stations. The company is
we ll aware that some close residents may resent a station in the area
so always makes every effort to operate their properties in such a
manner that they receive a minimum of objections. The City of South
Miami is well aware of their method of operation, they are also located
in South Miami on Red Road just north of the Dixie Highway.
~. The Atlantic Refining Company has agreed to maintain a buffer zone
on the south and eaat sides of the subject property consisting of a
4 to 6 foot cement wall, a dense hedge of the same height, backed by
a tall hedge or row of trees, all designed to absorb light and noise.
the company will vary this buffer to meet any reasonable improvement
the city may suggest.
9 . The plans submitted to the city with this application are those of
a standard station, when applying for a building permit will abide by
the code of the City of South Miami.
It is not Mr. Pecora's desire to attempt to upset the orderly plan-
ning and zoning of the City of South Miami, he is just asking that
the city be reasonable in considering his position. In a few words,
it is that he cannot utilize this property without proper zoning,
which is , due to the immediate proximity of the other stations,
-2-
r;
C-2 with a special permit for service station operation, without
this zoning he must pay for something he cannot use, or lose his in-
vestment.
In view of the obvious hardship to wh ich Nr. Pecora is being subjected ,
I respectfully request the City of South }1 iami to favorably consider
this application.
Sincerely yours,
W. E . Campbell
The residents of the area were present in force objecting to this
change of zoning.
Summary of Objections:
Spot zoning , lack of need, n oise , increased traffic, lights at
night, no sidewalks along that area, therefore, increased danger
to school children going to school, n o buffer zone between.
Mr. Campbell, agent for Atlantic Refining Company , indicated that he
believed that his clients would dedicate and c ons truct a sidewalk on
the east and south sides of this prope rty in order that the school
children would not have to go around the front of the service station "
BO ARDIS ACTION ON PUBLIC FEARING
Re : John Pecora
Hr. Brau, seconded b y Mr. Rutledge, moved that the Planning and Zoning
Board recommend to the City Council that the application of John
Pecora, owner of the W 210' of N1-li NWi NWi NWi Section 25-54-40, for
a change of zoning from RU-l to C-2 to allow the construction and
use of a ga soline service station, be denied as this would be a non-
conformin g use, no hardship exists and this proposed use does not
conform to the proposed Master P lan. Location: SE Corner of SW 56 g 'c ,
and SW 67 Ave nue.
~H:·~:·
Polled -Yes 9
No 0
Chairman Paden then read the notice of public hearing, duly advertise d
in a newspaper of daily publication, by the City of South Hiami for
the purpose of considering an amendment to Section 20-4 of the Zoning
Ordinance of the City of South Miami.
Proposed amendment to Section 20-4 of the Zoning Code:
(lJ
(2)
Application for p ublic hearin g before Planning and Zoning
Board -~30 0 00
Change of occupant or use inspection fee -~1 1.00
There were no objectors present.
""3.3-
...
c
c
•
BOA RD'S ACTI ON ON PUBLIC HE ARI NG
Re: Section 20-~. of Zoning Code
Mr. Rutlea ge, seconded by Mr.
Zo n ing Board recomm e nd to the
and (2) of the Zonin g Code be
Gibbs, moved that the Planning and
City Council that Rection 20-4 (1)
amended to read as follows:
(1) Ap plic f tion for pu b lic heari n g before Planning and Zoning
Board ,;30.00
(2) Chang e of oc c upant or use inSpe ction fee ~.,1.00
for the pur p ose of servin g the b e st i n t e r e st of the citizens of South
Hiami.
-;;-.;,~::-
Polled -9 Ye s o No
Chairman Paden then read the notice of public hearing, duly advertised
in a newspaper of daily publication, by the City of S outh Niami for
the purpose of c onsiderin§ amendments to Chapter 20-20 of the Zoning
Ordinance of the City of outh Niami. (See attached copy).
There we re no objecto r s present.
BOAR D'S ACTI ON ON PUBLIC HLAR I NG
Re: Section 20-20 Zoning Code
Mr. Fergus o n, s e c onded by Mr. Yakely, moved that the Planning and Zoni ng
Board recomm end to the City Counc i l tha t Section 20-20 of the Zoning
Or d inance be amended and a zone classific a tion of RU-5 be established
for the p urp os e of servin g the b es t interests of the citizens of. Sout h
Hi ami.
-;H :-~:-
Polled -9 Yes
o No
Ch a irman P aden then read th e letter from A. D. Lewis requesting ap-
proval of a tentative plat called SU NRISE ES TATES, FIR ST ADDITION.
5001 sw 65 Avenue
,C:;o uth Miami Planning and Zon ing Board
S outh Miami City Hall
S ou t h Hiami, Florida
Dear S irs:
I a m h e r ewith presenti n g a t e ntative plat for your approval on .~he
described property recently annexed to the City of South Miami by
-4-
,0
"-.-.
c
-•
County Ordinance No. 61-35. Upon approval of tentative plat by
South ~1iami and Dade County, f'inal copy of' plat and improvement
plan which includes topography, canal excavation, f'ill, streets
and othe r i mprovements required by South Miam i, will be submitted.
Thankin~ you very kindly, I am
Very truly yours,
Alfred D. Lewis-President
BOARD'S ACTION ON TEN TATIV E PLAT
Re: Sunrise Estates, First Addition
A.DoL. Corporation
Nr. Yakely, seconded by Mr. Corsiglia, moved that the Planning and
Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the tentative plat
~UNRISE ESTATES , FIRST ADD ITI ON , a propo sed subdivision of the W~
11 1 . of' NE" NW" SW." of Section 24-54-40 les s the E 66 ' thereof', be approved
insofar as zoning is concerned. Location ,C;W 411 St r eet and SW 64 Court.
·:H~-;:-
Polled -Yes 9
No 0
There being no furth er business, by motion properly made and
seconded, the me e ting was adjourned at 9:15 P. lL
By: () f £1;( /J ,/f'"' ,;;;I.) '-"'...C /'L,(L/
.r--:-""L -. -Gre ene ; Zoning Director
i
'--
'--
"-
Present:
Absent :
~'IINUTES OF THE REGULAR HERTING
OF THE SOUTH tlIANI PLANNING AND
ZON I NG BOARD, OCTOBER 1 0, 1961,
AT CITY HALL AT 8 :00 P. H .
Jack S tanton, Chair man
Car l Paden, Vice Chairman
Albert Corsir-:lia
Hyron Keys
John Brau
Thomas Foster
Harold Yake ly
Sidney Efronson
James E . Fe rguson
C . R . Gibbs
R . E . r'utl e d g e
Ex Offi cio : J. L . Greene
Mr . Yake l y , seconded by Mr. Corsi gli a, moved that the
minutes of the regular meeting of September 26, 1 961 be
adopted as individually read .
Po lled -Hotion carried unanimously .
-::·-:H:-
Chairman S tanton then read the notice of puhlic h e aring on
the application of John W. Fatool, owner of Lot 4 Block 6
Ludl um Estates Subdivision , for variances of 4 feet on side
setback for swimming pool and 4 .5 feet on side setback for
s c re e n enclosure to a l low constru ction of a sw i mming poo l
and screen enc losure . Location: 662 1 Sw 77 Terra c e .
The area of notification was 300 f eet . There were no
l etters of objection .
Mr . Fatool presented a pe tition signed by 9 prope rty owners
adjacent to and near his home approving this app l ication
fo r variances .
There were no objectors present.
BOARD 'S ACTI ON OIl PUBL IC HEARI l'G
Re: John W. Fatoo l
Mr . Paden, sec o nded b y Mr . Foster, moved that the P lanning
and Zon ing Board recommend to the City Council that the
V app l icat i on of John W. Fa too l , owner of Lo t 4 Blo c k 6-Ludlum
Estates Subdivision, for variances of 4 feet on side setback
on s wimming pool and 4 .5 feet on side setback for screen
enc l osure to al l ow construct i on of a swimmin g pool and screen
enc l osure be granted . Location: 6621 SW 77 Terrace .
Po lled
-::--;~.-::-
Yes 6
No I Corsi g lia
There being no further business before the Bo9.rd , the
meeting was adjour ned upon motion properly made , duly
seconded and carried at 8:30 P . H .
By: o ;( 4i f cec llV ~. Greene, Zoning Direct o r
•
c
c
0 .
'-0
HINUTr:S OF THE RE GUL AR MEE TI NG
OF THE :::;OUTH MI J\!H "LANNING AND
ZON I NG BOARD , OCTOB E R 3 1, 1 96 1,
AT THE CITY HA LL AT 8 :00 P .H .
Pre sent: J ack :::;tan t on , Gha irman
Carl Paden, Vic e Chairman
Alb e rt Corsigli a
J ohn Brau
S i dney S frons on
James F e r gu s on , Jr .
Thomas Fo ste r
C . R . Gibbs
My r on Keys
R . E . Hu tledge , Jr .
Haro l d Ya k e l y
~l r. Yakely, s econded by Hr. Gil)bs , moved that the mi nut es of the
r egul a r meeting of Octobe r 1 0 , 1 96 1 be adop t ed as ind ivi dua lly
r ead .
Po lled -Motion carr i ed unanimou sly .
-::--::--::--::--::--;:--;:--::--::-
Chairman Stanton t hen r ead t he not ic e o f pub l i c heari n g on the
application of J ohn J . a n d Sarah L . Ro ot , owners of the \,J 264' of
the s~ of s J"J i Sl',J~ Sj,Tt of <:;e cti on 24 -54-40 , l ess the north 60 ' o f
the W 2 00 ' thereof subj e ct t o r o a d dedications of re c o r d , for a
chang e o f zonin g fr om RU -l to C-2.
The area of notificatio n was 300 f ee t .
fi r.
the
and
Mon ra d fl . Thue , Jr ., attorney for the app lic ants, addressed
Board a nd invite d attention to his l ett e r of October 1 0 , 1961
t he app l icants I l ette r o f Oct'obe r 28 , 1 961.
Octobe r 19, 1961
P l annin g a nd Zoning Commis si o n
City o f South Mi am i
South }1iami, F lo ri d a
Gentlemen:
\oI e repre sent t il T . and Nrs . John J . Ho ot who are the own e rs o f
the following described property wi thin the corpo rate limits of
S ou th Miami, Florida:
The 'lest 264 feet of the South ~ o f the Southwest one -
lJ.u a rter, Sout h west one -quarter, SouthHest o ne -quarter ,
Se ct io n 24 , 'l'ownsh i o 5 4 South , R ange 4 0 E ast , l e ss the
No rth 60 f ee t of the I·Tes t 2 00 f ee t the reo f, s u bject to
r oad dedications of records ,
L
which property is on the Northeast corner of the intersection of
H iller Road and Lud l am Road .
Ap plication is he reby made f or the rezonin g of this property f r om
its preRent RU -l classification to C -2 (commercial ).
The owners are requesti n g this r ezoning for the folloViing reasons :
1. The conR tru ction of gasoline se r;vi ce stations on the North-
west and Southwest corners of t h is intersection, to g ether with
othe r commercial activity near the property , have chang ed the char-
acter of this PY'o ·,'erty from residenti a l to commerci a l.
2 . The heavy vo l ume of traffic on Lud lam and ~Ii ller Ro ads
has c hanr ed the character of the p roperty from reRidential to
comme rc ial.
3 . The foregoing reas on s have made it unwise , i mp r a c tica l
and undesirable to devote the property to the uses available under
zoning c l assification RU -l.
4.. The adj acent commercia l acti vi ty haR a c tually reduced the
value of this property for residential use .
5 . The existing residential zoning has caused this property
to be pra ctically unusab l e and unmarketable .
6 . The existence of a 50 foot \>later p ipe easement on the
prope rty, as RhoVin on the survey Hhich has been furnished to the
Bui l ding Inspe ctor, rend ers it virtually imp os sib l e to c onform t o
the setback and other regulat i ons app l icab l e to sin p;l e family residences.
7. The applicants have owned and pa i d taxes on the property
f o r many years , and the non -utility of the property b y reason o f the
zonin g has created and wil l continue to create a definite hardship
to them.
~. The applicants also are owners of residential property
adjacent to the Eas t of the tract under c on side r ation, whi ch wi ll
a ct as an effective bump e r strip , operating and protecting the
reRidential property to the East Hhich abutts on Mi ller Road .
9 . The improvement o f this vacant tract wi ll he of benefit
not on l y to the applicants , but to the City o f South Niami as He ll,
because of the additional tax revenue such i mproveme nt wo uld provide .
Your c on si de rati on of this reques t for rezoning is g reatly appreciated .
H'1T Jb g
Yours very truly ,
110n rad R . Thue, Jr .
Attorney for Applicants
-2-
'---
\...-
o
Octobe r 28, 1 96 1
Zonin g Board
City of South Miami
S ubj e c t : Rezon i ng of northeast corner of "W 67 !.ven u e and
!';\.) 56 Stree t from FlU -l to C -2 .
Gent l emen :
He a r e for the change of zO liHn g , as we own the a c re o f
l a n d adjacen t to corner , to the east of 6539 SVI 56 ~t r eet , and
within t h e 300 feet of the l e g a l comp l aint , for or against the
z oning .
Due to the c hange in commercial property surrounding us -
a furniture store , run out of the home to the east of us and a
catering , out of the home , on the south si de of SW 56 ~treet ,
vasoline stati o ns on southwest and northwef't , corners of PM
67 Ave nue , wholesa l e an d retail nursery within 1 50 f eet of the
corner of S"1 67 J'.ve nue . In v iew of the g r ea t increase in
tra f fic on this corner (checked by Dade Cou nty), 13 ,500 daily
or near five mi llion cars a y ear , and wil l . increase 600 dai l y
yearly , I , therefore , fee t th a t this corner shoul d be re z oned
to C-2 .
JJR :JC
Ve r y trul y yours ,
John J . Hoo t , Sr .
Sarah L . Root
No othe r statemen t s in sup·po rt of this app l ication Here r eceived
by the Board .
'1 rit t en obje c tions we r e r e c eived from seventeen neighbo r ing property
owners . Seven objectors addressed the Boa r d in per s on .
BOJIRD 'S ACT I ON
~e : J ohn J . and Sarah L . Roo t
Hr . Rrau, s econded by Mr . }o'os ter , moved that the P l anning and Zoning
Boa r d recommend to the C ity Council that the app l ication of John J.
and Silrah L . Root , OHner s of the 1.) 264 ' of the "tt o f the !,;Hi Svli s ltJi
of Se c tion 24 -<;4 -40, less the north 60! of '.J 200' thereof subje c t
to r oad dedications of record , for a chan ge of zoni n g from RU -l t o
C -2 be den i ed on the grounds that C -2 is not in keeping with thi s
area , that it would depreciate the neighbo rin g residentia l propert i es ,
and that ther f" is no h ardship sufficient to justify such a radical
departure from the present zoning; and , further t h at subsequent to
the adoption of the proposed Ru -5 zonin ~ classification now pending
befo r e the City Counci l, the zonin g of t h is property be changed f r o m
RU -1 t o RU -5 . Location : lIE c orner of S·, 67 Avenue and S~J 56 S t r eet .
-3-
-'
'-
C:
Polled -1 0 Yes
1 No
rlr . Paden indicated that he favored denial of the current appli -
cation but voted NO on the motion because of the presumption that
nU -5 zoning ,Jill be adopted by the Council , that it will be su it-
able to this area and acceptable both to the applicants and the
neighboring p roperty owners ; none of which has been established
by the facts at this time .
'::'-;.--:;. -;:--::--;:--::--;:--::-
l'1 r . Rutled"e , seconded by Mr . Brau, moved that the Planning and
Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the Zo n ing Code be
amended to provide that:
~:--:H:-
"No application for a c hange of zoning affecting the same
property or any portion thereof which has been withdrawn
or denied shal l be filed again within one year after the
date of such withdrm'Tal or final denial unless the Zoning
Board al l ows withdrawal without prej udic e or the fina l de ci sion
is made without nrej u di ce, provided that the one year
period sha l l not comm ence to run unU.l the de cision hfls be e n
rendered by the last Board to consider the application .
And further p rovided the one year limi tat ion shal l not
ap p l y to applications originated by the Councilor the
Plannin g and Zoning Dire c tor . "
Oc tober 31 , 196 1
Polled 9 Yes, 2 No
Robert E . hutled g e
John Brau
f1 r . Corsi g lia and Mr . Paden stated that they ,lere not
opp osed to the p urpose of this motion but voted NO because
they consider a mandatory Haiting period of one yea r to be
excessive and untenable.
-::--:H:--::--::-::-
There being no further business before the Board, the meeting Has
adjou rn ed by motion at 8:45 P . H .
By: C. (! 4(Jr, t l-
w c . C . Paden
Act i n g Secret ary
•
'irNUTES OF THE REGULAR 11E :f:)m
OF THE SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND
ZONING BOARD, NOVE~ffiER 14, 1961,
AT THE CITY AT 8:00 P.M •
Present: Jack ~tanton, Chairman
Carl Paden, Vice Chairman
Albert Corsiglia
Absent:
Sidney Efronson
Thomas Foster
C. R. Gibbs
Myron Keys
Harold Yakely
James Ferguson, Jr.
John Brau
R. ~. Rutledge, Jr.
Chairman Stanton appointed Mr. Paden as adting secretary pending
the appointment of a new zoning drrector.
~H*"-::-
r1r. Corsiglia, seconded by Nr. Yakely, moved that the minutes of
the regular meeting of October 31, 1961 be approved as individually
read.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously.
C >'~"' . .... ..
c
Chairman f,tanton then read the notice of public hearing on the
application of Thomas F. Jardine, owner of Lots 1,2,3,24,25,26
Block 1 Westerfield Manor, ~ection 3, for a change of zoning from
C-l for Lots 1,2,3 and RU-l for Lots 24,25,26 to C-2 for all.
Location: SE corner of SW 59 Avenue and SW 40 Street.
NE corner of ~W 59 Avenue and f,W 41 Street.
The area of notification was 300 feet.
Mr. George Thomson, attorney for Mr. Jardine, addressed the Board
on behalf of the applicant.
Several letters .Tere received.
.;;
.:" .
',', .......
"" ;, ;)-
T'"
.,:.;", (:
.j"
--
-
· .. INUTEi> OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND
ZONING BOARD, NOVEMBER 28, 1961,
AT CITY HALL AT 8:00 P.N.
Present: Jack f>tanton, Chairman
Carl Paden, Vice Chairman
John Brau
Albert Corsi g lia
Sydney Efronson
James Ferguson, Jr.
Thomas Foster
C. R. Gibbs
Myron Keys
R. E. Rutledge, Jr.
Harold Yakely
Absent: None
~~--:H:-
Mr. Yakely, seconded by Mr. Gibbs, moved that the minutes of the
regular meeting of Nove mber 14, 1961 be approved as individually
read.
Polled -Hotion carried unanimously.
~HH :'
Chairman Stanton read the notice of public hearing on the appli-
cation of Robert M. Anderson, owner of Tract A Ludlum Estates
Subdivision, for a variance of 16 1 on rear setback to allow the
construction of a single family residence.
The area of notification was 300 feet.
Mr. Anderson addressed the Board in his ovm behalf and invited
attention to the peculiar location and irregular shape of this
lot.
No communications for or a g ainst this application were received.
No objectors a p peared.
Mr. Rutledge, seconded by ~'I r. Gibbs, moved that the Planning and
Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the application
of Robert M. Anders on, owner of Tract A Ludlum Estates Subdivision,
for a variance of 16' on rear setback be granted.
fJ'ter extended discussion, Mr. Paden, seconded by Mr. Yakely, moved
that the application of Robert M. ft~derson be tabled to permit fur-
ther study by the Board.
~:.-;:.~:.
Polled -Yes 7
No 4
L
-3-c
Mr. Brau and Mr . Keys withdrew at this point .
-:HH:
Mr. Foster, seconded by Mr . Efronson , moved that on the basis of a
written opinion by the City Atto rney, dated November 13, 1 961, and
addressed to Chairman Stanton, the P lanning and Zoning Board wi ll
not accept in the futur e an application for a variance or chan ge of
zoning on the sam e pie ce of propert y within six mont hs from the
date of fin al action by the Board on a p revious application .
Po lled 9 Yes
o No
Hr. Jac k Stanton
6520 }l ille r Road
South Miami, F lori da
Dear }-fr . Stanton:
No vember 13, 1 96 1
Pursuant to our conversation of recent date , I am dropping you a
short note re g arding the proposed c hange in zonin g pro c edure as out~
lined in the Board 's re cent re comm endation to the Council . Refer-
ring , of c ourse , to the rec omm.endation of the Board that zoning appli -
c at ions as to any pa rticular piece of property be considered not
more often than once a year .
'-I refer you to Section 2 0 -51, et seq., of the Code o f Ordinances .
Under these prov isions the P lann ing a nd Zoning Board is free to
adOpt its own rul es of p roc edure . It is my opinion that as a pa rt
o f the pr o ce dural rules the Board may impose any reasonable require-
ment not in dire ct violation of the City Chart e r or Ordinances . It
is my understandin g that the Board has alr e ady taken advantage of
this Section and limited the numbe r of publi c heari ngs to three per
session . I sugges t that you use this power to impos e some restraint
as to repe ated applications for re z on in g of prope r ty, however , I
c ons ider one y ear to be mo st unreas onable and unfair, le g ally
speaking .
I believe that you c oul d hold to a 90 day r equirement . It is p ossible
that a s ix month requirement mi ght s ta nd UP if there were no inter-
vening change s in the p r operty concerned .
The true test is one of reasonabl e ness and my feeling is that the
Board i s mo r e capab l e of d et e rminin g what is re asonable than I, and
t herefore, I do not make any concrete su ggestions as to the time
element, other th an set forth above .
One nh a s e in par t i cular bothers me with t h is type restraint . It is
v ery easy to r e phras e an app li cation and meke it appear l egally a
c omplete l y new p roposition, etc ., L e ., a man mi ght apply f or a var i-
ance , then reapply fo r a re z o ·'1 ing , t hen reapply for a rez on ing of a
another n a ture, or z oning classification, and I d o not b e lieve you can
stop this
BBHbg
Mo st cordially 'T ours,
Geo r ge B .· Hardie; Jr.
"-
C" ··4-
':HH ~'
Mr . Efr o n son, s econded by Nr . Rut le dre , mov ed t ha t at all future
me et i n p:s o f the P l anninf' and Zon i ng Boar d , a t wh ich o ne or more
puh l i c he a r i ng s are sche d u l ed , a p rofe s si o n a l s teno g r aph e r shall
b e emp l oyed to recor d a nd tran s cribe t he p roceeding s.
.::.~: .. ;:-
P olled -9 Ye s
o No
Th ere b ei n g no f 1..::'ther bus i ness b e fo re t he Boar d , the me e ting wa s
adj ourne d at 1 0:0 0 p , Mo
Car l P aden, Ac t in g S e cre t a r y
,
· '--'
'--
'-
Present:
Absent:
****
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
JANUARY 22, 1962 AT CITY HALL AT 8 P.M.
Jack Stanton, Chairman
John Brau
Albert Corsiglia
Thomas Foster
C . R. Gibbs
Myron Keys
Carl Paden
Edward C. Vining, Jr .
Harold Yakely
Sidney Efronson
John V . Hardeman, Jr .
lY"rr. Paden, seconded by Mr. Brau, moved that the minutes of the
regular meeting of January 8, 1963, be approved as individually read .
Polled: Motion carried unanimously
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the application
of Hope Lutheran Church, owner of Lots 1 thru 10 and 31 thru 36, Block
2, Bird Road Estates, PB 32/18, for a variance on setbacks for the
purpose of constructing a new sanctuary. Required 25' -proposed
20'1", variance 4'9", located at 6330 Bird Road.
After a revie~ by the Board of the plot plan presented by the
Architect, Alfred Parker, and the discussion of changes of the pro-
posed construction relatitive to the zoning property line, the Hope
Lutheran Church withdrew their request for a variance.
****
The Chairman stated the tabled item of Thomas F. Jardine remains
on the table.
****
The Chairman asked the Board's pleasure on the tabled Bird Road
Report.
Colonel Yakely, seconded by Colonel Gibbs, moved that the Bird
Road matter be removed from the table. Motion carried .
1/22/63
'-
'--~
"--
• ,....,
Mr. Brau commented on Mr . Ferguson no longer being on the Board,
however, they held a meeting with Colonel Gibbs and decided for the
record as well as for the information for the Council, that they would
submit a written report. Mr . Brau read his report and Colonel Gibbs
also read his report. Mr. Brau suggested both reports be made record
of the minutes.
Colonel Yakely, seconded by Colonel Gibbs, moved that these
reports be accepted and made part of the minutes , as a matter of
information and for future reference. Motion carried unanimously.
Colonel Gibbs, seconded by Mr . Brau, moved to recommend to the
City Council, that the Board has studied the matter of re-zoning
along the South side of Bird Road, and the Board finds that this
area should not be rezoned at this time.
Polled : Motion carried unanimously .
****
The Chairman appointed himself
the minutes of the Council sent out
members prior to approval of same.
City Manager on this matter.
****
as a committee of
to the Planning &
The Chairman will
one, to have
Zoning Board
speak to the
Mr. Vining brought up the matter of set-back information given
over the telephone, if incorrect information is given, as was evident
at tonight's hearing of Hope Lutheran Church, it would be detrimental
to the architect and planners, and a reflection on the City. This
can result in a costly mistake.
****
The meeting adjourned upon motion made by Mr. Vining, seconded
by Mr. Brau and carried at 9 :40 P.M.
Enc. Copy of Bird Road Report
Copy of Bird Road Report
J. Brau
C. Gibbs
1/22/63
......... ," •
BIRD ROAD REZONING
As a committee member appointed by Chairman Stanton to make a
study of the city areas of Bird Road and make recommendations
to the Board, I submit the following analysis of my study .
The subject property is presently zoned RU-2. The majority
of requests for change have been for C-l .
The property to the rear of the Bird Road frontage is zoned RU-l.
To arbitrarily change zoning so that C-l abutts RU-l is against
all recognized planning and zoning principles and practice. To
do so would create a new hardship to many more property owners
than are affected under the present study of Bird Road frontage
owners.
There is no question that a problem exists with Bird Road frontage ;
however, to create a new problem is no way to correct an existing
problem.
It is obvious that there is an abundance of useable land in South
Miami that is zoned business and is not being utilized for business.
The need for additional commercially zoned property is very quest-
ionable.
To give strong consideration to the point of increasing real
estate and other tax income is unfeasible. There are several
blighted areas in South Miami that requires far more ~er~ices
and produce far less tax income than the subject property. Our
c colored area is a blantant example.
There has been no real, concrete, tangible evidence of need for
businesses on Bird Road. The arterial traffic p;ooblem that is
cited as detrimental to the land use from a residential viewpoint
is, by the same token, a ripe situation for increased hazardous
and crippling traffic flow that would evolve from commercial
use of this subject property.
To grant a zoning change on the basis o f argument that the land
can not be utilized for RU-2 because of the arterial traffic
nature of Bird Road would serve to set aprecedent that could
· -
conceivably affect the other arterial roads, namely; Sunset
Drive, Red Road, Ludlam Road, Miller Road and SW 62 Avenue.
Traffic flow alone cannot dictate zoning use.
This Board sits as a Planning Board as well as a Zoning Board.
We must plan as well as zone. To take isolated lots and rezone
without planning is to create future Zoning and planning problems.
Bird Road, being a section line, has been a main road for many
years. It is not difficult to ascertain that the County and
State Road Departments set-up section line road-ways as the
primary type, arterial rights-of-ways. The right-of-way dedica-
tions are greater on section lines and half section lines. This
information is easily obtainable from the proper County officials.
The argument that some relief should be granted was a valid one.
By going to RU-2 a degree of relief was granted. The question
is whether or not this is sufficient relief; however, there also
arises the question of what relief to several groups of lots
will do to the balance of the area. Spot relief has rarely
served to properly rectify any controversial area.
Following a thorough study and based on studied planning and
zoning I submit the following recommendations.
1. That the entire municipal area from Bird Road South to the
City's South Boundary being 1 lot deep on SW 44 Street, be taken
under study for an overall plan for equitable, suitable, reason-
able and sensible rezoning. That this study be made by a
Planning Committee from the Board, and that a member of the City
Council and/or a City Zoning Director be an ex-officio member of
the Committee to provide a fundamental liaison between Council
and Board. That after a thorough study and a homogenization of
the committee's planning a writ~en report be submitted to Council,
and in addition, this report be mailed out to all property owners
in the affected areas. That the next step be to hold a Public
Hearing, followed by a final report and recommendation by the
Board to the Council for action.
2. That the above report include a reversionary provision
of from two to ten years on any recommended and granted zoning
changes.
3. That the County Planning and Zoning Board be invited to
attend meetings and to submit any recommendations. That the
City try to work with County planning where County co-operation is
extended.
4. That Bird Road property owners be advised that any requests
during the interim period prior to action by the City on the
recommended report will be heard without prejudice; however, it
is recommended that only those requests accompanied by tangible,
concrete building and use plans be submitted; and further that
Council place a 90 day reversionary provision on any such
granted applications.
Respectfully submitted, John W. Brau, Vice Chairman,
South Miami Planning & Zoning Advisory Brd.
REPORT OF BIRD ROAD REZONING STUDY BY COMMITTEE MEMBER, C . R. GIBBS
1. GENERAL :
I have studied the zoning situation on Bird Road between SW 57
Avenue and Ludlam Road and recommend a written report to the
Planning and Zoning Board, substantially as follows :
a. The area has been developing during the past 20 years
from a sparsely settled residential area to an increasingly
approved commercial area. The area presently constitutes a
hodge-podge of residential homes an d commercial establishments,
with sizeable areas not yet built upon .
b. It is apparent that in recent years the "through-highway"
aspect of Bird Road under the expanding trend of construction
to the South and West in Dade County, has become evident to
the property owners and they are, almost without exception,
holding their property for increased valuation or sale-profit.
·c. There appears little likelihood of continued residential
development along Bird Road in the South Miami area, because
of the creeping encroachment of commercial zoning variances
during the past few years .
d. The existence of Tropical Park and the Palmetto Expressway
immmediately to the West of the subj e ct area would have a
depressant effect on residential building , even though a strict
residential zoning were maintained. These two permanent in-
stallations because of their magnitude could not conceivably
be removed in the foreseeable future, and hence no one could
reasonably expect a residential growth to the West from Coral
Gables; or even less likely, a "residential renewal" program
in the future for this area, as was recently described by
Mr . Barton (City Manager) as being the trend in certain older,
northern metropolitan areas.
e . The lots on the South side of Bird Road in the subject area
of insufficient depth to allow reasonably consistent commercial
use. They vary from about 90' to about 150', less easements .
f. It would be possible to rezone for RU-5 in the entire area,
with reasonable use of the narrow depth lots, provided the
Purchaser/Builder were willing to obtain additional land for
parking, and to locate his proposed building with regard to shape
and depth of the lots. The lots generally are not suitable for
even RU-5 use as presently laid out.
2 . CONCLUSIONS :
a . It is apparent that there will be no appreciable further
residential construction in the subj.ect area. The property
owners, in general, are apparently more interested in the sale/
profit aspects of this property.
b. There is no reasonable future commercial use of the South
side of Bird Road, within the subject area, without rezoning,
variances, or special-use permits .
c. Since there is no clear indication whether RU-5 (or less
restrictive commercial use) may be appropriate, because of the
"Wait-and-see" attitude of those interested monetarily in the
property, it may be best at this time to withhold rezoning action
with regard to the entire area.
d. The best prospective action at this time would appear to be
the announcement of the foregoing concept, with the anticipation
that prospective or present property owners would submit a plan
for suitable commercial development of proper sized parcels of
land. In this manner, orderly transition of the Bird Road area
and adjacent areas to the South could be considered by the Board.
2 C . R. Gib bs
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH HUHI PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD,
FEBRUARY 27, 1962, AT THE CITY HALL AT
8:00 P.M.
Present: Carl Paden, Vice Chairman
John Brau
Absent:
{HH~
Albert Corsiglia
James Ferguson
Thomas Foster
C. R. Gibbs
Myron Keys
Harold Yakely
Jack Stanton, Chairman
Sydney Efronson
R. E. Rutledge
Mr. Yakely, seconded by Hr. Corsiglia, moved that the minutes of
the regular meeting of February 13, 1962 be adopted as individually
read.
Polled -~iotion carried unanimously.
iHH~
The matter of the a~plication of Mrs. Emily Lowing, owner of the
S 67' of the E 165' of Tract 1 of Larkins Forest Subdivision. for
a change of zoning from RU-l to C-l to permit the operation of a
Farm Store (retail dairy store) was brought before the Board at
the request of Mr. Thomson, attorney for the owner. Location:
7420 ~w 57 Avenue.
The Board recommended to the City Council on December 12, 1961 by
a vote of 7 to 2 that this application be DENIED. On January 16, 1962,
the City Council placed this matter on the table.
The Board is in receipt of a letter from Mr. George Thomson,
attorney for Mrs. Lowing, dated February 19, 1962, requesting that
he be permitted to appear before the Board at its next regular
meeting.
Mr. Thomson addressed the Board in behalf of the applicant regard-
ing the recommendation for Denial by the Board on December 12, 1961.
Mr. Quarles, tenant of the property, spoke in behalf of Mrs. Lowing.
Mr. Keys was excused before the Board went into executive session.
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: Mrs. Emily Lowing's Application
Mr. Foster, seconded b§ Mr. Corsiglia, moved that the Planning and
•
Zoning Board further recommend to the City Council that the
a~plication of Mrs. Emily Lowing, owner of the S 67' of the
E 165' of Tract 1 of Larkins Forest ~ubdivision, for a change of
zoning from RU-l to C-l to ~ermit a Farm Store (retail dairy
store), be DENIED because the Board finds certain aspects of
this operation similar to C-2 classification and believes this
type of operation in this area would not be in the best interests
of the City.
Polled -5 Yes
2 No Gibbs and Brau
Mr. Corsiglia, seconded by Mr. Foster, in view of failure to
obtain a majority vote of the Board (6 votes), moved to table this
matter until the next regular meeting.
Polled 5 Yes
2 No Gibbs and Brau
~Ht-*
There being no further business before the Board, the meeting
was adjourned upon motion properly made, duly seconded and carried
at 9:45 p.ri.
Harold Yakely, Acting Secretary
South Miami Planning and Zoning Board
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING
BOARD, MAY 8, 1962, AT THE CITY HALL
AT 8:00 P.M.
Present: Jack Stanton, Chairman
John Brau, Vice Chairman
Albert Corsiglia
Absent:
****
Thomas Foster
John V. Hardeman, Jr.
Myron Keys
C. R. Gibbs
Carl Paden
Harold Yake1y
Sidney Efronson; James Ferguson
Mr. Paden, seconded by Mr. Brau, moved that the minutes
of the regular meeting of April 24 be corrected to read Mr.
Brau, Vice Chairman, and Mr. Paden's name removed as Vice
Chairman, this change was made April 10, 1962. Minutes
stand corrected as read.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously.
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the
application of Will Ferguson, owner of Lot 53, Block 9, of
Franklin Subdivision, for a Special Use permit to convert the
garage of his home into living quarters. Location: 6401 SW 59 Ct.
No communications for or against this application were
received by the Board and no objectors appeared in person.
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: Will Ferguson's application
Mr. Foster, seconded by Mr. Keys, moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the applica-
tion of Will Ferguson be approved as submitted.
Mr. Paden wishes to go on record that he is not opposed to
this recommendation but wanted something in the minutes that
this is a hardship case, that the letter should be made part of
the minutes, that this would not establish a precedent.
Ma",-",h 28. 1962
To the South Miami Planning and Zoning Board
Re: will Ferguson, 6401 SW 59 Court. South Miami, Florida
At the suggestion of the South Miami Building Inspector
I am writing this letter regarding \'Jill Ferguson.
I hRve known him for at least 20 years, and he has
lived in South Miami since 1914.
He started converting the garage of his home into
living quarters, really a small apartment, not knowing
he had to have a permit. The man he had engaged to do
the work called it a remodeling job that did not require
a permit, but now he understands a permit is necessary.
Will has been blind for the past four years. He is
desperately in need of income funds and is in need of a
little income from the rental of these quarters. I am
fully aware of his condition and can vouch for same.
Your attention and consideration \~ill be appreciated.
****
Polled -Yes. 9
No, 0
Sincerely.
/s/ Elva Carballo
Mr. CorSiglia asked for leave of absence of 30 days and
was granted same.
****
All members expressed their appreciation in having a secretary
to take the minutes. Mr. Paden is to be commended on handling
the extra duties as secretary.
****
There being no further business before the Board, the meeting
was adjourned upon motion properly made, duly seconded and
carried at 8:15 P.M.
111~C~ Matilda Callan, Secretary
_/
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING
BOARD, MAY 8, 1962, AT THE CITY HALL
AT 8:00 P.M.
Present: Jack Stanton, Chairman
John Brau, Vice Chairman
Albert Corsiglia
Absent:
****
Thomas Foster
John V. Hardeman, Jr.
Myron Keys
C. R. Gibbs
Carl Paden
Harold Y2.ke:y
Sidney Efronson; James Ferguson
Mr. Paden, seconded by Mr. Brau, moved that the minutes
of the regular meeting of April 24 be corrected to read Mr.
Brau, Vice Chairman, and Mr. Paden's name removed as Vice
Chairman, this change was made April 10, 1962. Minutes
stand corrected as read.
Polled -Hot ion carried unanimously.
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the
application of Will Ferguson, owner of Lot 53, Block 9, of
Franklin SUbdivision, for a Special Use permit to convert the
garage of his home into living quarters. Location: 6401 SW 59 Ct.
No communications for or against this application were
received by the Board and no objectors appeared in person.
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: Will Ferguson's application
Mr. Foster, seconded by Mr. Keys, moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the applica-
tion of Will Ferguson be approved as submitted.
Mr. Paden wishes to go on record that he is not opposed to
this recommendation but wanted something in the minutes that
this is a hardship case, that the letter should be made part of
the minutes, that this would not establish a precedent.
Ma~'ch 28, 1962
To the South Miami Planning and Zoning Board
Re: will Ferguson, 6401 sw 59 Court, South Miami, Florida
At the suggestion of the South Miami Building Inspector
I am writing this letter regarding lVill Ferguson.
I have known him for at least 20 years, and he has
lived in South Miami since 1914.
He started converting the garage of his home into
living quarters, really a small apartment, not knowing
he had to have a permit. The man he had engaged to do
the work called it a remodeling job that did not require
a permit, but now he understands a permit is necessary.
Will has been blind for the past four years. He is
desperately in need of income funds and is in need of a
little income from the rental of these quarters. I am
fully aware of his condition and can vouch for same.
Your attention and consideration \'lill be appreciated.
****
Polled -Yes, 9
No, 0
Sincerely,
/s/ Elva Carballo
Mr. Corsiglia asked for leave of absence of 30 days and
was granted same.
****
All members expressed their appreciation in having a secretary
to take the minutes. Mr. Paden is to be commended on handling
the extra duties as secretary.
****
There being no further business before the Board, the meeting
was adjourned upon motion properly made, duly seconded and
carried at 8:15 P.M.
/n~(!.~
Matilda Callan, Secretary
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
MAY 29, 1962 AT 8 P.M. AT CITY HALL
Present: Jack Stanton, Chairman
John Brau, Vice Chairman
Sidney Efronson
James Ferguson
Thomas Foster
C. R. Gibbs
John V. Hardeman
Myron Keys
Carl Paden
Harold Yakely
Absent: Albert Cor3iglia
****
Chairman Jack Stanton, seconded by Colonel Gibbs, moved that
the minutes of the regular meeting of May 8 be approved as read.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the appli-
cation of Frank R. Howell, owner of Lot 3, Block 13, Seaview Park,
First Addition, for a variance on rear setback to allow the
addition of a room to residence. Location 5960 SW 85 Street.
Present setback requirement 25 feet; proposed 23.58 feet,
Variance 1.42
Mr. Howell presented letter to Chairman showing no objections
from neighbors regarding this variance. No objectors appeared in
person.
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: Frank Howell'S application
Mr. Keys seconded by Colonel Gibbs moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the application
of Frank Hmvell be approved as submitted.
Polled -8, Yes
2, No
Motion carried
Mr. Paden requested to make note in minutes that no justification
was offered by applicant and no hardship shown for this variance.
-1-
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the
application of J. F. Lineberger, O\vner of VJ 175' of N 180' of wlz
of NE';, of NT!7';, of Section 24-54-40, less N 50' and W 25' granted
for road purposes, for a change of zoning or Special Use permit
to allo\v the construction of a Gasoline Service Station.
Location -SE corner of Bird Road and S~J 65 Avenue.
No communication for or against this application were
received by the Board. No objectors appeared in person.
BOARD'S ACTION
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Efronson, moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the application
for a Special Use Permit complying with all building requirements
and City zoning be approved.
****
Polled -7, Yes
3, No
Motion carried
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the
application of South Miami Hospital, lessee of Lot 28 and Lot 29,
W. A. Hobbs Subdivision, for a Special Use Permit to allow the
operation of a Hospital Personnel and Bond Office. Location-
6251 Sw 74 Street.
No communication for or against this application were
received by the Board and no objectors were present.
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: South Miami Hospital's application
Colonel Gibbs, seconded by Mr. Yakely, moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the application
of South Miami Hospital for a Special Use Permit be granted to
South Miami Hospital as lessee of subject property.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously
NOTE: Mr. Thomson, attorney for the Hospital requested that the
required fee be waived, but this Board felt this was not within
their providence.
-2-
·n**
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the application
of ~"Jilliam Lehman Motors, Inc., owner of Tract 2-A of E. R. Clark
Property, a subdivision of a portion of Amended Plat of Palm Miami
Heights 43/20, for a variance to permit the con~truction of a garage
with a body shop stall for the reconditioning of automobiles.
Location -Approximately 6251 Svl 78 Street.
The Chairman read letters of protest from Reverend Arthur Rantz,
Mr. X. F. Bober.
Objectors present: lfrr. Jack Bronson represented the neighbors
protesting this variance; Mr. Bronson's father at 6200 SW 78 Street,
lfrrs. Baker at 6210 Slil 78 Street, Mrs. Lee Taylor at 6240 S\'J 78 Street,
Mrs. Myers a-t 6221 SW 78 Street, and Mr. ,'Jhi telock at 6211 SW 78 Street.
Mrs. Robertson as trustee for Mrs. Taylor's children objected
with regard to the children's interest in this property at 6210
sw 78 Street.
Mr. Stanley Ersoff represented Mr. Miller, stated Mr. Miller
has deposit receipt on the above legal description and that a suit
is now pending. Mr. Ersoff asked that the Board withhold decision
on this variance.
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: Wm. Lehman Motors, Inc., application
Mr. Efronson, seconded by Colonel Gibbs, moved to table
this application.
Polled -Motion to table -carried unanimously
****
The Chairman asked for the Board's feelings on the proposed
Tenative Plat of JOHN'S VILLAS SUBDIVISION.
Mr. Yakely, seconded by Mr. Brau, moved that the Planning and
Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the Tenative Plat
of John's Villas Subdivision be approved as submitted.
**
Polled -8, Yes
2, No
Motion carried
Mr. Paden,
motion carried,
seconded by Mr. Brau moved to adjourn meeting,
meeting adjourned at 9:55 P.M. '--m.(!~
Respectfully ~ubmitted, M. Callan,Secy.
Present:
Absent:
-iHHH(
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH MIfu~I PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
JUNE 12, 1962 AT 8 P.M. AT CITY HALL
Jack Stanton, Chairman
John Brau, Vice Chairman
Albert Corsiglia
Sidney Efronson
Thomas Foster
Myron Keys
Carl ?aden
Harold Yakely
James E. Ferguson
C. R. Gibbs
John V. Hardeman
Mr. Efronson seconded by Mr. Paden moved that the minutes
of the regular meeting of May 29 be approved as prepared.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously
·::--iHH:-
The Chairman read the notiue of public hearing on the
application of Kenneth A. Bastholm, owner of the East 137.5' of
Tract 4, Larkins Forrest Subdivision, for a change of zoning to
permit the construction of a professional building.
Location -7450 sw 57 Avenue. Existing Zoning RU-l; Proposed RU-5.
The Chairman read a letter of approval from Milton Field,
now owner of the late Maurice Field property.
Mr. Thomson, attorney for Mr. Bastholm furnished drawings
on this property which were viewed by the Board and copy of same
will be made part of this file.
There were no objectors present and no letters of objection
received.
BOARD'S ACTION
RE: Kenneth Bastholm's application
Mr. Paden seconded by Mr. Keys moved that the Planning and
Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the application
of Kenneth Bastholm be approved as submitted.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously
~:HH:·~:·
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the
application of Jerry Annis and .?hilip Berman, owners of Tracts
2 and 3, Revised Plat Tract A, Southgate Center ?B 65/35, for
a change of zoning to allow the construction of an apartment house.
Location -North of apartment house at 6341-51 SW 80 Street.
(North of Canal.) Existing Zoning c-2; Proposed RU-4.
Mr. William Woziuk of 6341 S~J 80 Street appeared before the
Board to voice his objection on changing the zoning to RU-4,
stating this property should remain commercial as the City is
already crowded with apartments.
No other objectors present and no letters of objections
were received.
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: Jerry Annis and Philip Berman's application
Mr. Yakely seconded by Mr. Brau made a motion that the
Planning and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council to
approve request of Jerry Annis and Philip Berman for change of
zoning from C-2 to RU-4.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously.
~:-~H:·~:·
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the
application of Raymond F. Bierbaum and John Trabold, owners of
Lots 4 and 5 of Block 2, McKeever Terrace, for a change of zoning
to permit the construction of a 7-11 Grocery Store. Location-
SW Corner of SW 61 Avenue and Bird Road. ~xisting Zoning RU-2
on Lot 5; RU-l on Lot 4. Proposed C-l.
The Chairman read letters of objection from the following:
Robert E. Coleman of 4108 Stu 62 Ave. Hr. and Hrs. Raymond A. Melton
of 4032 SW 62 Avenue, Albert and Dorothy Carr of 4033 S1;1 62 Avenue,
Bernard L. Young of 4032 Sl~ 61 Avenue, Mr. and Mrs. Stephen Kozazcki
of 4101 '31,'1 62 Avenue, Mr. R8Y tVilson of 4100 SW 62 Avenue,
Mr. and Mrs. R. F. Bennett of 4100 SIt! 61 Avenue, and a circularized
letter written by Mrs. f" E. Breitenstein of 4023 m~ 62 Avenue.
Letter of approval on application was received from Carl E. Taylor
of 4125 S'I1 62 jIVenue.
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: Raymond F. Bierbau and John Trabold's application
Mr. Foster seconded by Mr. Yakely moved to table this appli-
cation. The Board was informed of pending suit which is now
before the Appelate Court and Mr. Foster's motion was to table
this application until the Appelate Court renders their opinion
on the Lower Court's decision.
Polled -Yes, 6 No, 2
·:H:·-;~-·~~
Remarks:
Mr. Foster seconded by Mr. Keys moved that the ?lanning and
Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that Sub-paragraph (d)
of ?aragraph (2) of C;ection 20-14 of the Zoning Code that reads
APAl1TMENT HOUSES AND HOTELS --"One parking space for each
. 2 sleeDing rooms" be amended to read "One rrarking SDace for
each unit of two or less sleeping rooms, and 2 of parking space
for each additional sleeping room.
Polled -Motion passed unanimously
There being no further business Mr. Paden seconded by
Mr. Corsiglia moved to adjourn. Motion carried, meeting
adjourned at 9:10 2. M.
ResDectfully submitted,
'-, "j .... / t· ,.
/1//1. '/r:·( ,.f/ (~ (.:,b-il.~p/1----'
Aatilda lJallan,
:3ecretary
Present:
Absent:
****
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
JUNE 26, 1962 AT CITY HALL AT 8 P.M.
Jack Stanton, Chairman
John Brau, Vice Chairman
Albert Corsiglia
Sidney Efronson
Thomas Foster
C. R. Gibbs
Myron Keyti
Harold Yakely
James Ferguson
John V. Hardeman
Carl Paden
Executive meeting
Mr. Efrontion,seconded by Mr. Corsiglia, moved that the
minutes of the regular meeting of June 12 be approved a~ prepared.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the
application of James Bruce, lessee of 4036-40 Red Road, Lots
11-14 Block 2 t'iesterfield Manor, Sec. 1, 2 PB 18/47, for a
change of zoning to permit a cocktail lounge in conjunction with
the LIQUOR MART at 4040 Red Road. Existing Zoning C-l;
Proposed C-2.
The Chairman read letters of objection from Doctors
F. E. Verdon and J. K. Rozum 4100 Red Road; telegram from City
of Coral Gables Zoning Board, signed by John E. Vinsant Secretary;
special delivery letter from Doctor H. B. Rosen 5710 SW 41 Street;
petition signed by 50 objectors.
Mr. Bruce rerccesentiiig himself, gave a short resume of his
business career and why he hoped tloe Zoning Board '~ould recommend a
change of zoning.
The Chairman asked if any objectors were present -from the
large number present -the following objectors were heard:
Sid Steinberg represented Association of Merchants on Red Road;
William Gray 1521 Garcia; Dr. John Liebler 1511 Cantoria and a
request from Mr. Cook of Metro Zoning to record his objection.
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: James Bruce's application
Mr. Corsiglia seconded by Mr. Brau moved that the
Planning and Zoning Board recorrunend to the City Council tr.at
application of James Bruce be denied as C-2 zoning request.
Polled -Yes, ·8
1 Absentee
Motion carried
****
The Chairman read the notice of pUblic hearing on the
application of Irene T. Marchion, owner of the South 87' of
Lots 10,11,12,13,14,15, Block 9, Cocoplum Terrace PB 25/4, for
a change of zoning for the purpose of opening a Real Estate
Broker's office at 6333 Sunset Drive. Present Zoning RU-l;
Proposed RU-5.
The Chairman read a postal card in favor of change from
Irene Briner of 7223 S\'] 63 Court. Letter of objection from
W. D. Horton 6377 SW 69 Street; petition of 52 names opposing
change of zoning.
Mrs. Marchion appeared before the Board, stated she did
not want to change appearance of residence but only to open an
office to supplement her income as the property is too much of
an investment as a residence.
Joe Tatol of 6313 Sunset next door neighbor to Mrs. Marchion
is putting his house on the market for sale as a residence, he did
not Object to the change of zoning as he felt Sunset is destined
to be commercial.
Frank Van Marlen of 5610 Sunset had no objection to change
of zoning.
There being no others in favor, the Chairman called for
objectors present at this meeting.
James Bronson of 63 Court objected as this being Spot or
Strip Zoning, but if an Occupancy License could be issued and not
be transferrable, he would not object.
Isabel Boggs of 63 Court; Mr. Topping 7011 S .. , 63 Court;
and i'lrs. Henry, voiced their objections to change of zoning.
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: Irene T. i'larchion's application
Mr. Yakely seconded by i'lr. Corsiglia moved that the Planning
and Zoning Boctrd recommend to the City Council that the Board deny
the application of Irene Marchion of zoning from RU-l to RU-5.
****
Polled -Yes, 7
No, 1
1 Absentee
Motion carried
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the
application of Robert M. Shermer, owner of Lot D of Re-subdivision
of Lots 7,8 Block 1 and Lot 7 Block 3, La Hamaca 55/26 for
variances as fOllows: Location -6301 Miller Road
1. Reduce the required 25' rear setback on residence
to 10' to allow the addition of a Game Room.
2. To convert storage area in detached two car
garage to a room and bath.
The Chairman read a letter in favor of variances from
Peggy S. Fisher, 6291 Miller Road. No objectors present at
meeting and no letters of objection were received.
Mr. Shermer advised the Board he had built in 1954 when
required set back was 5' that he had planned on adding garage
to North side of rear. However, in 1957 the City had adopted a
requirement of 25' rear set back. The area adjoining his property
in the rear is acerage which requires a 50' set back and with
this proposed variance of 10' there would be 35' between property.
Mr. Joseph Ronco the owner of acerage adjoining Mr. Shermer's
property did not want to object to the proposed 35' between property,
but asked the Board to postpone this decision as his property is
up for sale and he may want to rezone his property. The acre runs
thru to 63 Court.
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: Robert M. Shermer's application
Mr. Foster seconded by Mr. Yakely moved that the Planning
and Zoning Table this application as the members of the Board
could not reach an agreement with a majority of the members present.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously
-,
REMARKS:
Mr. Foster seconded by Mr. Gibbs moved that the recording
secretary of the Planning and Zoning Board send notice of publjr
Hearing by mail to any Municipality and Dade County Zoning Depar~-
ments whenever their area might be adversely affected by a proposed
change of zoning.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously
It was unanimously decided that the Chairman would not
read all the names on petitions in the future. The Chairman will
state the number of signatures on all petitions, and the record
will be available for inspection to all interested parties.
Mr. Corsiglia seconded by Mr. Yakely moved that the meeting
be adjourned. Motion carried, meeting adjourned at 9:50 P. M.
Respectfully submitted,
Matilda Callan
Secretary
Present:
Absent:
****
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
JULY 10, 1962 AT CITY HALL AT 8 P.M.
John Brau, Vice Chairman
Albert Corsiglia
Sidney Efronson
James Ferguson
C. R. Gibbs
John V. Hardeman
Carl Paden
Harold Yakely
Thomas Foster
Myron Keys
Jack Stanton, Chairman
Mr. Yakely, seconded by Mr. Efronson moved t.lat the minutes
of the regular meeting of June 26, 1962 be approved as prepared.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously
****
The Vice Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the
application of Alfred D. Lewis, owner of Lots 25, 28, 29, and
35 of Sunrise Estates, First Addition PB 75/19, for variances
on front and rear setbacks to alaow the construction of residences.
Location of Lots 25 and 28, 5301 and 5391 Svl 65 Avenue;
Lots 35 and 29, 5230 and 5390 SW 64 Court;
Present requirements: Maximum front setback -56'
Minimum rear setback -25'
House must face West on Lot 28 and
East on Lot 29
Proposed, Maximum front setback -90' on Lots 25 and 35
Rear setback on Lot 35-20'
Permit houses to face South on Lots 28 and 29 with same
setbacks of 25' to West line of Loc 29 and East line of
Lot 28; 7~' to Nort~ lines, 25' on Avenue sides and 15'
on Street side.
Mr. Lewis was not present at time of hearing; no objectors
present and no \vritten approval or objection was received by the
Board.
BOARD'S ACTION
Re, Alfred D. Lewis's application
"
Mr. Paden seconded by Mr. Corsiglia moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that application
of Alfred D. Lewis be approved on Lots 25 and 35 and denied on
Lots 28 and 29.
****
Polled -Yes, 6
No, 2
Motion carried
The Vice Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the
application of Eren Smith, owner of Lot 18, Block 3 of Franklin
Subdivision PB 5/3!} , for a Special Use permit to allow the
construction of a fish market. Location 6450 SW 59 Place.
Present Zoning C-l; Proposed Use C-3 with special permission of
Council.
Lloyd Collier of Parkview Construction Company stated this
building was designed to fit into the neighborhood and being a
small building that it would not present any traffic problem in
this neighborhood. That he had obtained approval from the Board
of Health as there are certain requirements necessary for a fish
market. One side of this building would be rented out but to the
type of business Mr. Collier did not know but that it \vould be
something compatible \Vi th t:he neighborhood. Mr. Collier stated
he knows lYlr. Smith personally, that he is now \.;i thout Ii velyhood
and would like to put this land to use.
No objectors appeared before the Board and no letters of
objection were received.
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: Eren Smith's application
Mr. Corsiglia seconded by Mr. Paden moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the application
of Mr. Smith be denied.
Polled -Yes 6
No 2
Motion carried
'-
The Vice Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the
application of H. H. Tashkin and H. A. Krueger, prospective owners
of Lots 21 thru 2<'., American Tm·msites Subdivision PB 3/134, for
a change of zoning to permit the con3truction of an apartment house.
Location approximately 7441 S~] 59 Place. Present zoning RU-l,
Proposed RU-4.
Mr. Thomson. represented the prospective owners. Mr. Thomson
said this would be a first class con.;truction building, which ,,,ill
uplift the character of the neighborhood, as this is an unimproved
area and no ne\" construction has been done for a number of years.
There ,,,ould be no request for variances and if this application
is approved, application for permit would be made \"ithin one week
and construction would begin within two weeks.
No objec·tors were present, quite to the contrary, with
approximately 25 people present, Helen Miller spoke for the
people present. They were in terested in seeing the plans for
the building, they 1tlere pleased that this property would be u.;ed
for an apartment building. Mrs. Clarence Pope also spoke as owner
of property in the vicinity, she was very much in favor of the
proposed building.
It is indeed commendable to the citizens and a healthy
atmosphere for the City of South Miami that the interested
people appear at our hearings to voice their approval.
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: H. H. Tashkin and H. A. Krueger's application
Mr. Yakely seconded by Mr. Efronson moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the application
of H. H. Tashkin and H. A. Krueger for change of zoning from RU-l
to RU-4 be approved.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously.
****
lfrr. Brau seconded by Mr. Paden moved that the previously
tabled applications be postponed until the July 31 meeting when
all Board members are present.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously
lfrr. Paden seconded by Mr. Corsiglia moved to adjourn, motion
carried, meeting adjourned at 9:10 P.M.
Respectfully submitted, ) /(
Matilda Callan, Secretary 'lIe
Present:
Absent:
****
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH MIAi"!I PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
.nJLY 31,1962 AT CITY HALL AT 8 P.M.
Jack Stanton, Chairman
James Ferguson
Thomas Foster
C. R. Gibbs
John Hardeman
Myron Keys
Harold Yakely
John Brau
Albert Corsiglia
Sidney Efronson
Carl Paden
Mr. Yakely, seoonded by Mr. Stanton moved that the minutes
of the regular meeting of July 10, 1962 be approved as prepared.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the
application of Margaret D. Meyer, owner of the ~169.5' of N125'
of Tract 5 of Palm ~Uami Heights PB 43/36, for a variance on
lot size and lot frontage to allow the construction of a single
family residence. Location Corner S\1 62 Avenue and SW 78 Street
Requirements: Lot frontage 100 feet with 12,500 sq. ft. of land
Proposed: Lot frontage 69.5 feet with 8,687.5 sq ft of land
Mrs. Myers appeared before the Board asked that a variance
be granted as she would like permit to build; that the building
would improve the neighborhood as she would not want to hurt her
own property. She did not think that anone complained.
i·lr. Keys inquired if she were the original owner; if she knew
Mr. vlhi te, original owner had tried to get two house s or two
buildings there. This did not come before the Board, as Mr. Greene,
originally with the Department had advised lJIr. lihite that the
zoning requirements would not permit two houses on the lot.
IIIr. Foster remarked that there should be 100' right of way at
this location.
The Chairman called for any person present in favor of this
variance. There being none, the Chairman called for any objectors
present. Professor Rouse and Mr. C. H. Thompson appeared in
objection to this variance, and letter of objection was received.
-1-
The Chairman then read the letter of objection from
Mr. and Mrs. Steade S. Howie giving their reasons for their
objections as follows:
1. According to the study made of South Miami of the best
land use, the planning proposed to keep this area the lovely
residential district it is.
2. There are several large tracts owned by individuals
at present who are opposed to lowering the zoning of this area.
However, at some future date, the present property owners might
sell the land, and a request for similar variances might be made
using this one, if granted, as the basis for a change. A
lowering of the requirements would result in cheapening the
entire neighborhood.
3. We have just made a sizeable addition to our home, feeling
that we were not pricing our home out of all proportion with the
other homes in this area. If this variance is granted, so close
to our home, it will tend to devalue our property as well.
/s/ Steade Howie
/s/ Betty 1;1. Howie
Professor Rouse of 6121 SrI 79 Street objects strongly to any
change, stating this in effect is not a variance by are-zoning
request. Even the RUI is 75' frontage and 10,000 sq ft, and this
area is RUIA with requirements of 100' frontage and 12,500 sq ft,
therefore this is asking for re-zoning. The second pOint alluded
to in notification letter, when there are threats to proposed
changes in a neighborhood, it is an expense to those who own
property, and in this particular neighborhood people have had to
appear before the Board several occasions to protect their interests.
At this particular time, there are many people who would be
interested but are out of town. The Professor asked, how much
control do the petitioners have. The Chairman explained the
necessary steps thru the regular channel to the City Council's
decision.
lVIr. C. H. Thompson of 6110 SH 78 Street stated he had the
same objections as Professor Rouse.
Mrs. Meyer asked to be heard again --she is not just asking
for property change, if the objectors would care to laok at the
plans they would see it is a nicer home than is in the neighborhood
at this time. Would improve the neighborhood.
Colonel Gibbs aSked about the square footage of the building,
and was told it was 1800 sq ft plus garage and patiO, approximately
2520 sq ft.
Professor Rouse said, "since 14rs. Meyer acquired this property,
if now at this time" a change is put thru, would cause a reduction
in value of my home', "that Mrs. Meyer knew there could not be
two houses on these lots. t.
-2-
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: Margaret D. [ljeyer's application
Mr. Keys, seconded Colonel Gibbs moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that application
of Margatet D. Meyer be denied as no hardship was shown and the
RUIA requires 100 foot frontage with 12,500 sq ft of land.
Polled -l'lotion carried unanimously.
****
The tabled application of Robert M. Shermer will be left
on the table until more Board members are present and this
matter can be discussed.
The previously tabled application of Raymond F. Bierbaum
and John Trabold was taken off the table by motion of James Ferguson
seoDnded by [ljr. Keys. After a short discussion, Mr. Yakely,
seconded 'oy Mr. Foster moved to return to table. Mot ion carried
unanimously. It is expected more members will be present at the
next meeting for discussion on this application.
l~r. Foster requested leave of absence from 16 August to
12 December 1962, to attend a company school in New York.
Mr. Yakely seconded by Mr. Keys moved that leave of absence
be granted to Mr. Foster.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously.
REMARKS :
Mr. Foster asked that the tabled applications be put
on the Agenda. Everyone agreed this was a good suggestion and
hereafter all tabled applications will be placed on the Agenda.
There being no further business, upon motion duly made,
seconded and carried, the meeting adjourned at 9:00 P.M.
Respectfully submitted
/7Zwa.~Cv~
Matilda Callan, Secretary
-3-
,
Present:
Absent:
****
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH MI~~I PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
AUGUST 28, 1962 AT CITY HF,LL AT 8 P.M.
Jack Stanton, Chairman
J~hn Brau
Albert Corsiglia
Sidney Efronson
James Ferguson
C. R. Gibbs
Harold Yakely
Thomas Foster (\"lith permi:o;sion)
John Hardeman
Carl Paden
Mr. Yakely, seconded by John Brau moved that the minutes
of the regular meeting of July 31, 1962 be approved as individually
read.
Polled -l''1otion carried unanimously
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the
application of H. H. Tashkin and H. A. Krueger, prospec-ti ve owners
of Lots 12, 13 and 14 of American Townsites, for a change of zoning
to permit the construction of an apartment house.
Location -approx. 5981 S\-! 76 Street; Present Zoning RU-l;
Proposed RU-4.
The Chairman said there was no correspondence in the
file on this matter and asked if anyone present was repre~enting
Mr. Tashkin and Krueger.
Mr. Thomson would represent the prospective mvners, however
he had been detained. The hearing on this applica-tion '-las set
aside until later.
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the
application of R. C. Quarles, owner of the S 67' of E 165' of
Tract 1, Larkins Forest, for a Special Use permit to allow a
Farm Store (retail dairy) .
The Chairman read the following letter from Mr. Thomson,
attorney for R. C. Quarles.
"
Augu;,;t 27, 1962
Planning and Zoning Board
City of South Miar,.i
1;;outh Miami. Florida
Re: Quarles-Lowing Hearing
Gentlemen:
Please be advised that the reasons for tbe request for a Special Use
Permit for the property concerned follow:
The City recently rezoned the subject property
to the C-l classification and an application for
a building permit for a Farm Store ,.,as then filed.
The City denied the application on the ground
tl,at the use sought \vas a drive-in operation.
The applicants contend:
1. That this would be no more a drive-in
operation than are the First National
Bank of South Miami, or South Miami Federal
Savings and Loan Association, and that
denial of the use of this property as a
Farm Store is arbitrary and discriminatory.
2. That the ordinance on wbich the Ci ty bases
its denial is vague and indefini·te in that
it doesn't define a "drive-in operation".
Furtder, that said ordinance ,vas enacted
at a time before Farm Stores existed and
probably related to drive-in restaurants
or theaters.
My clients feel that Farm Stare usage properly falls
,vi thin the C-l classificat on and a building permit
sllould be issued to them. They have filed the
present application in an effort to resolve all
differences of opinion as amicably as possible.
Thank you for your consideration.
Very truly yours,
(s) George Baker Thomson
Mr. Thomson had arrived in the meantime, apologized to the
Board for being late and presented his side on this application.
This property was changed to C-l to allow Dairy Store. the
C-l application change of zoning ,va~ granted. however. the drive-in
operation appeared to be objectionable to the City. Mr. Thomson
asked the Board to refer to Section 20-22 Commercial C-l Business
Districts -"No building or land shall be used and no building
shall hereafter erected, constructed, or reconstructed or struc-
turally altered which is designed, arranged or intended to be used
or occupied for any purpose ,unless othe~~ise provided for, excepting
for one or more of the following uses, none of which shall consist
of a drive-in operation:" 1fJr. Thomson asked the Board, why is this,
different than our Bank and Savings & Loan Association; we also
drive up to the Post Office, and the Post Office have drop boxes
allover the City. There can be no question at all that C-I is
the zoning of the Bank; why are they allowed drive-in operation,
which is all around the bank. Mr. Thomson suggested to the Planning
and Zoning Board that the ordinance section 20-22 is good at the
time it was made, that he can remember when the Bank and the Savings
and Loan Association did not have drive-in facilities, but that they
get them because their representation is not primarily drive-in.
Hr. Thomson said the Board is not being equal in applying to the
applicants. He believes this phrase section means to prevent places
like the "Big v!heel" and drive-in theaters. The Farm Stores have
no food preparation on the premises, it is only package merchandise.
The City will have to have unique commercial appeal to compete with
Dade land , something that ~rill bring the people to our shopping
district. Dadeland does not have Farm Stores. Traff~c objections
were made to this application in the past, but wi tL 2~ million cars
registered in Florida, there will always be traffic problems.
The Chairman called for any objectors present.
Carl Lindgren of 7175 SH 64 Street owns property north
of 74 Terrace and 64 Avenue, does not object to the Farm Store,
as he does not know whether this wou ld be good or bad. The main
objection would be other restrictions that might come up for
commercial or other types of businesses, that some set pattern
should be made all the way down the line.
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: Robert C. Quarles' application
After a short discussion, Mr. Gibbs, seconded by
Mr. Efronson made a motion this body recommend to the City Council
that application be granted. Polled motion resulted in a tie vote.
Mr. Corsiglia, seconded by l"lr. Brau moved to Table this application
until the Board gets a clear cut definition on this classification
from the City Attorney.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously
**** Item one on the Agenda, Tashkin and Krueger as previously
read by the Chairman.
The Chairman read the following letter of objection from
George B. Hardie:
3
>
South 14iami Planning and Zoning Board
City Hall
South Miami, Florida
August 28, 1962
Re: Lots 12, 13, 14, American Townsites
Dear Sirs:
I am in receipt of a Notice of Public Hearing, mailed out by
your body regarding the application of l~r. Tashkin and Hr. Krueger
in reference as to the above property.
I wish to voice my objections to the lowering of the zoning in this
neighborhood. The property in question, while not abutting on my
property, is in the immediate neighborhood {less than 300 feet}.
I feel quite strongly on the intrusion of apartment houses into
single-family residential neighborhoods, as, serveral years ago,
I saw the same thing happen in the neighborhood where I grew up as
a boy. After some fifty years of living in a home in Coconut Grove,
the gradual invasion by apartment houses into what had been a single-
family neighood forced me to sell my home.
In South Hiami, the time interval has been much shorter, as I
purchased my home last December, after carefully checking the
existing zoning and relying on it.
l10uld you kindly enter my objections to the proposed re-zoning
and make it a part of the record.
(s)
Very truly yours,
George B. Hardie
Nr. Thomson representing Tashkin and Krueger told us this
would be a 2 story 22 apartment house, it was not second class,
would improve the neighborhood, the contract was for $150,000 and
would need a dignified area. There was a need for high level apart-
ment houses in South Miami.
The Chairman ca~led for any persons in favor; there being
none, he asked for any objectors to this application.
The following objectors we~e heard:
1. G. Sultie 9375 SH 77 Terr·ace; ~1rs. T. Fos ter 6021 SW 76 Street;
Bernard Kepshire 6031 SI'! 76 Street; IfJrs. C. Carter 5961 SI'! 76 Street;
Mrs. Alice Rosenthal 6020 SF 76 Street.
Mr. Sultie inquired about the other apartment house in that
area, the ground had not been cleared nor had the building been
started; what did the master plan call for in regards to apartment
houses. Mr. Brau answered that permit had been taken out for this
other apartment house; the Board had nothing todo with the master
plan that was done last year.
4
Mr. Thomson said in the interest of good neighbor re-
lations, he wanted the,;e people to know, hi.; clients had contract
for purchase of that other property, but tLere was a flaw in the
"ti tle, therefore the delay of 10 to 12 day,;.
Vlrs. Foster voiced her objections to an apartment house
in this area. Mrs. Carter and 1'lrs. Rosenthal do not want to have
apartment house on thi,; street. They all have nice homes and
tLi,; is residential area; they would not like more people on th~
street.
Mr. Kepshire referred to sta~~ent made by Mr. Thomson
that the property looked like a jungle; why was it allowed to be
kept that way, 76 Stree"t i,; residential down to dead enCl.. He
objected to having apartment zoning on the north side which would
open the doors to apartment zoning on the south side al,;o. Another
objection vJould be the number of cars for parking, the number of
children for a 22 apartment hou,;e. They already have a considerable
conjestion in that area back of the theater.
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: Tashkin and Krueger's application
Mr. Keys, seconded by Mr. Ferguson, made a motion that
the Planning and Zoning Board recommend this application be denied,
as this \~ould be spot zoning. This property is removed from any
other apartment or commercial zoning and s",lOuld be held back as a
buffer for "the residential homes there.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously
****
Mr. Ferguson, seconded by Mr. Brau made motion to remove
from table application of R. M. Shermer. Mot"on carried unanimously.
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: R. M. Shermer's application
Mr. Efronson, seconded by Mr. Brau made a motion that
the Board recommend to the City Council Item 1 -reduce required
25' rear setback on residence to 10' be denied. Item 2 -to convert
storage area in the detached 2-car garage to room and bath be
granted.
Polled -Yeti, 7
1 abstained
l'lotion carried
5
~". -'":;
****
Mr. Stanton, seconded by Mr. Yakley made motion to remove
from table the application of R. F. Bierbaum and Jjhn Trabold.
Motion carried unanimously.
t-lr. Efronson, seconded by Mr. Brau made motion to dismiss
this application.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously
****
Mr. Yakely, seconded by Mr. Ferguson made motion to remove
from table application of Lehman1btors. Motion carried unanimously.
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: Wm. Lehman Motors, Inc. application
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Efronson made motion to dismiss
this application.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously
****
There being no further business before the Board, Mr.
Efronson, seconded by Mr. Gibbs moved to adjourn. Motion carried
unanimously, meeting adjourned at 9:15 P. M.
Note:
Respectfully submitted,
'--)17~(}~ Mat~lda Callan, Secretary
On application of Lehman Motors -the tax records show
legal transfer of this property as of July 13, 1962 -
legal ownership John Miller and wife, Edna.
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI -PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
REFRESHER ON TABLED APPLICATIONS
August 1962
Raymond F. Bierbaum and John Trabold
Lots 4 and 6 Blk 2. McKeever Terrace
June 12, 19 2
Change of Zoning for a 7-11 Grocery
Location SH Corner S\'I 61 Ave & Bird Rd.
Existing Zoning RU2 on Lot 5,
RUlon Lot 4
Proposed C-l
Mr. Thomson represented Bierbaum and Trabold, gave reason for the
change of zoning as Bird Road being an arterial highway and there should
be commercial zoning as it must be agreed it will all be commercial
sometime; that conditions are worse now than they have been. It is a
heterogeneous mixture of business and residence. He realizes the objectors
point of view, recognizes the traffic problem, but the character of the
neighborhood on Bird Road and the interest use of the land, he submits
it should be commercial property that borders Bird Road.
Letter received in favor of change of zoning was received from
Carl E. Taylor of 4125 Slt) 62 Avenue.
Letters of objection were received from Robert Coleman, 4108 S\O! 62 Avenue;
Albert J. Carr, 4301 SI1 62 Avenue; Bernard L. Young, 4604 S\-[ 61 Avenue;
Ray tHlson, 4100 SI'! 62 Avenue; \l'Ir. & Mrs. J. VJisocky ,4101 sw 62 Avenue;
Circularized letter by A. E. Breitenstein.
!VIr. George \'lolfe of 4024 S~J 61 Avenue appeared before the board said
he came here from the North, has fixed up the place and wants to stay
there; if 7-11 store goes in there, there would be garbage cans, old
bottles put out; the street is very narrow \IThich is dangerous. Let
7-11 go some other place as any store has to put out garbage. The
hours from 7 till 11 P.M. and later is another objection.
!Vir. Yakely remarked that something should be done about this particular
spot. Mrs. \<Iolfe replied that they would not object to Law Offices or
Doctor's Building. Some bUSiness that would have regular hours like
offices.
Mrs. A. E. Breitenstein of 4032 Sl'J 62 Avenue appeared before the Board,
stated property would be affected; would ruin their homes and her home
was bought to live in and enjoy. The 7-11 would not be an asset only
an eye sore with the deliveries, rats, garbage; would only depreciate
the property -so why should the zoning be changed as the 7-11 would be
the worst thing except a night club whose activity would go on hours
longer.
IVIrs. R. Melton of 4032 SI-! 62 Avenue owner of Lots 6 and 7 object to
store but would not object to Professional offices or something else
so that area would be kept up.
*************************************************************************
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI -PLANNING & ZONING BOARD August 1962
REFRESHER ON TABLED APPLICATION
Robert M. Shermer
Re-subdivision of Lots 7, 8 Blk 1
and Lot 7 Blk 3. La Hamaca 55/26
June 26, 1962
Variance -
Location 6301 Miller Rd.
reduce required 25' rear
setback on residence to 10'
Convert storage area in the
detached 2-car garage to
room and bath.
Letter received in favor of variances from Peggy S. Fisher, 6291 Miller Rd.
No objectors present 'and no letters of objection received.
Mr. Shermer advised the Board he had built in 1954 when required setback
was 5' that he had planned on adding garage to North side of rear of
home. However in 1957 the City had adopted a requirement of 25' rear
setback. In that year he redrew plans to add Florida room. The area
adjoini~ his property in the rear is acerage which requires a 50' setback
and with this proposed variance of 10' there would be 35' between property.
His Mother lives with him 6 months of each year and ~ months with his
sister. He would like to use this room for her when she is here. The
roof area is separated by 9'.
Mr. Yakely asked if this addition is rear of garage -Answer, Yes.
Mr. Foster remarked that living quarters would affect closest house and
cannot be rented. It was suggested that a letter be required from
Mr. Shermer stating that he would not rent.
Mr. Brau asked if their were any cooking facilities or efficiency type.
The answer was -no.
Mr. Joseph Ronco, the owner of acerage adjoining Mr. Shermer's property
appeared before the Board stating he did not want to object to the
proposed 35' between property, but asked the Board to postpone this
decision as his property is up for sale and he may want to rezone his
property. Mr. Ronco acre runs thru to 63 Court.
.. ' CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI -PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
REFRESHER ON TABLED APPLICATION
William Lehman Motors, Inc.,
Owner of Tract 2-A of E. R. Clark"
Property 43/20
May 29, 1962
Augu.;t 1962
Variance to permit
the construction of a
Garage with Body Shop
Stalls
The Chairman read letters of protest from Rev. Arthur J. Rantz and
Mr. X. F. Bober. Letter in favor from Lehman Motors to install
shop.
lYJI. Harold Freeman said Leroy Smi·th paid $115,000 which is 29";b do\m.
The building is far enough away from houses; they would dedicate
a stip to the City; the ecomonic factor snould be considered. The
proper·cy was bought to build adjacant to it. The property had been
rezoned before and rezoned back.
Mr. Foster -this should be area "A" and area "B", labeled same,
triangle section "A" and rectangle section "B"; -Is C-l main conc~rn,
is "B" area 80,000 x 100,000 for this request; -how far away from
nearest house. Ans. 120,000 feet.
The Chairman called for anyone present in favor of this variance;
there being none, he then called for anyone present objecting to this
variance.
Mr. Stanley Ersoff represented Mr. Miller, who has a deposit receipt
for this property. Mrs. Ruell has suit pending, this is evidence that
Mr. Miller is true and lawful owner, and that Mr. Lehman has not
purchased this property: that it would be unfair to Mr. Miller,
manifestly unjust to let ~rr. Lehman have variance. Mr. Ersoff asked
the Board to withhold their decisions.
Mr. Efronson -we should not become involved in thLs dispute.
Mr. Jack Bronson represents neighbors -This area was very nice place
for parents and their children to play, it is residential area. It is
now being used a a car lot at one end of street and several cars are
tested on street before they are sold. The people do not want the
cars on the street: no access or ingress as variance reads to open.
Objectors are: Mr. Bronson: Mrs. Baker: Mrs. Gross Taylor: Mrs. Myers:
Mr. Whitelock: Mrs. Gross Taylor said this is a narrow street (78)
and it is being used for storing cars by Mr. Lehman. Mrs. Robertson
is trustee for Mrs. Gross Taylor's children and later will have to
realize money for the children, therefore she asked for delay of this'
variance and to deny variance.
Mr. Freeman said his client has strip of foliage in back and would
put up a fence, that his client does own this property.
'-
Present:
Absent:
****
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
SEPTEMBER 11, 1962 AT CITY HALL AT 8 P.M.
Jack Stanton, Chairman
Albert Cors iglia
Sidney Efronson
C. R. Gibbs
John V. Hardeman
I'lyron Keys
Carl Paden
Harold Yakely
John Brau
James E. Ferguson
Thomas Foster (with permission)
~lr. Efronson, seconded by lJIr. Yakely moved that the minutes
of the regular meeting of August 28, 1962 be adopted as prepared.
Polled -Notion carried unanimously
***.*
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the
application of Creola i"iae Da\1S0n, owner of Lot 63, University
Park Subdivision, for a Special Use permit to operate a beauty shop
in a building on the rear of property. Location -6530 Sl-! 57 Place,
Zoning RU-l.
The Chairman asked if Creola r4ae Dawson was present or anyone
present to represent lJIrs. Dawson. IVlrs. Da\~son did not appear at
the hearing and had no representation.
The Chairman called for any objectors present.
Mr. A. L. 14atthews of 6520 S\>! 57 Court stated he had purchased
his home in 1948, at that time it was a nice residential section,
since then the negro have worked their way in body, and until the
time we are forced out it should remain RU-l. This request should
not be allowed.
I'lr. Chicon of 6510 Sl'! 58 Avenue said he recently purchased
his property in January. He knew it was going negro and did not
have objection to being a mixed community as most of the people
were like the people present at this meeting, but with this type
of rezoning it would slowly and surely create a traffic hazard.
This building was not built for this rezoning, it is only 4 x 5
with no bathroom facilities. There is no way this person can perform
her obligations to her customers. This is residential not a business
zone and he wishes it to stay residential. [!Jr. Chicon says it would
de detrimental to his family if we are allowing businesses to start
in this area.
The Chairman had a poll taken of the other objectors present -
14 people in all -it would be impossible to hear all of them, and
if anyone had anything to add that had not been mentioned, he would
hear them, otherwise the hearing was closed.
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: Creola liJae Dawson's application
iiir. Paden, seconded by !'Ir. Keys moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the application
of Creola Mae Dawson for Special Use permit in residential area
be denied.
***'*
Polled -Yes, 6
Abstained, 2
Motion carried
The Chairman aSked the City Attorney for clarification of
classification on the Farm Store, on tabled application of
Quarles and Lowing, so that this application could then be removed
from the table for action.
The City Attorney stated the Farm Store is a "Drive In Operation".
/iJr. Thomson, attorney for r,1r. Quarles then asked, "for point
of classification this has been a Drive In Operation, that determin-
ation was made by the City."
l~r. Keys, seconded by ~lr. Efronson made a motion to remove
from table the application of the Farm Store. 110tion carried.
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: Quarles and Lowing's application
Mr. Keys, seconded by Mr. Efronson made a motion that the
Planning and Zoning Board recommend to the Cit~ Council that Special
Use permit to allow a Farm Store (retail dai~J) be denied.
****
Polled -Yes, 7
No, 1
Motion carried
Mr. Thomson asked the Board's indulgence in referring to the
application of R. F. Bierbaum and John Trabold which had been
dismissed by the Board August 28, 1962. He wished to clarify a
remark he made to the Board two weeks ago when he referred to the
7-11 store. He would like the Board to make recommendation to
City Council a staying on application for public hearing.
****
The Chairman asked for discussion on the application of
R. F. Bierbaum and John Trabold, regarding change of zoning which
had been tabled by the Board June 12, 1962 because of pending
litigation; removed from the table August 28, 1962 and dismissed.
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: Dismissed application of Bierbaum & Trabold
rjr. Yakely, seconded by Mr. Paden made a motion to reconsider
the action taken with respect to this property and restore for action.
Polled -iclotion carried unanimously
l\lr. Yakely, seconded by liJr. Efronson made a motion to table
this application unEil the next regular meeting when the Board
vlOuld have the complete file on this application.
Polled -Notion carried unanimously
****
The Chairman read t\~O letters from the l/letro Building and
Zoning Department wi th reference to Notice of Public Hearings -
1. Property at 8151 S~'.1 57 Avenue, within 50 feet of
South liliami boundaries
2. Property, South side Sl'! 72 Street between S~! 54 Avenue
and S1,,) 54 Court, within 860 feet of South IfJiami
boundaries
The Chairman asked the City Manager to reply to the letters
that the South IUami Planning and Zoning Board \~ish to go on record
objecting to the proposed zoning changes.
****
Mr. Efronson, seconded by j\lr. Yakely moved to adjourn, motion
carried, meeting adjourned at 9 P. Iii.
Respectfully submitted,
/~> / I,U > {~4( / __ ' '---:..' (( ,./.>..:"", ~t'_j
Matilda Callan
Secretary
Present:
Absent:
****
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR l'lEETING OF THE
SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
SEPTENBER 25, 1962 AT CITY HALL AT 8 P.M.
Jack Stanton, Chairman
John Brau
Sidney Efronson
James Ferguson
C. R. Gibbs
John Hardeman
Myron Keys
Carl Paden
Harold Yakely
Albert Corsiglia
Thomas Foster (with permission)
l-lr. Efronson, seconded by Mr. Yakely moved that the minutes
of the regular meeting of September 11, 1962 be accepted as individ-
ually read.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the
application of Sun Investment, Inc., prospective owners of a part
of Section 36-54-40, Westerly 400' measured along the Southerly
boundary line of the following described property: Begin at the
SE corner of the SE~ of Sec. 36-54-40 and run westerly along the
S line of said SE~ 1046' to the POB of this tract, thence N
parallel to the E line of said SE% 100.83' to the R/W line of the
Snapper Creek Canal thence NW along the said R/ftl line 770.96'
·thence S parallel to E line of said SEl;, 220.8' to the S line of
SE\ 423.3' thence Southeasterly parallel to the R/W line of canal
342.68' thence N parallel to E line of the SE~ 50.75' to the POB ••
for a change of zoning to permit the construction of an apartment
house. Location -approx. 5950 North Kendall Drive; Present
Zoning RU-lA; Proposed -RU-4.
The Chairman stated no correspondence had been received in
favor of the change of zoning, but that letters of objection to the
change of zoning had been received from the follo\·,ing:
Metro Planning Department recommending denial of the change
of zoning; Metro Building and Zoning Department registering vigorous
objection to the rezoning to permit apartment house; Florence Fuller;
Ann Petzoldt; Mrs. Smith; Emma Carnevale; Mr. & Mrs. Victor J. Miller;
Harold and Mary J)ilessersmi th; Mr. & IvIrs. Harold Koons; Mr. and Mrs.
James Doyle; Frank Overholt, Jr.; Howard Pearson; Margaret Adams;
Mrs. Roy Lee Jones: Catherine and Lance Purves; Grover and Joanne Baker:
Colin and Gloria MacArthur; Lisbeth Richards; Mr. and Mrs. Edwin Stone;
Petition of 106 objectors in addition to another petition of 130 objectors
Resolution from the Pinecrest Civic Association stating their Board of
Directors and all its members are opposed to change of zoning.
The Chairman recognized Lloyd Collier of 218 Shore Drive,
South Bay Heights who represented Sun Investment Inc., Mr. Collier
said ·this ,·muld be the most ideal spot in South Miami for an apartment
house, at the 'vaters edge of South i'liami. That this would be a
48 family apartment house of one and t,vo bedroom units with 6 up and
6 down in each unit. This ,,,ould be a luxurious type of apartment,
would bring $200,000 increase on tax roll and the purchasing pmver of
48 families: t;lis type of apartment would command hig"er rent, and
people in the highe;e income bracket which would bring more money into
South Miami: that Snapper Creek is a na·tural bumper for zoning so
that spot zoning would not spread. ·that 'vater would be brought into
the area and property owners nearby would benefit. Mr. Collier said,
there is a church and school here, therefore they do not feel that
they are breaking tbe barrier. That the 48 apartments would be on
2~ acres of ground and they did not feel they would be tramping on
any toes, apartments are needed in the area and would not be hurting
anyone in the area.
David Popper of 5900 SW 85 Street representing the people
north of Snapper Creek said that the area is first of all city of
homes, residential homes, and they want to protect what they have.
Multiple apartments ruin family residences, that this is not the
time to put in multiple apartments with all the houses no,v available.
The Dade Countians present ",ere also helping US in South Miami. Yes,
there is a church and school in the area but people do not live there,
and they have regular hours for service. This spot zoning would be
an opportunity to others and should not be allowed. The people in
the area are people who can afford ·their homes and that is ,,,hy they
bought into this residential area; they also support South Miami.
This proposed change of zoning is not desired, it "Jill not benefit
the residents, it is repugnant to all the people present.
Mr. Joe McCarthy of 8920 S,,/ 61 Court represented the people
on the south side o·f Snapper Creek. He said they were very much
impressed with the display of the picture of the proposed apartment
house, hmvever, it was thru toil and labor that tde people were able
to put together an area that is residential where they had decided
to live, a place for their children to· play, raise their families
and a place they could be proud of; that they had moved away from
apartments and apartment house areas. These people spend a good
deal of money in SOUtil Miami and they object very strongly to a
change of zoning. ¥rr. McCarthy presented to the Chairman, a petition
wi th 150 signatures objecting to ·the change of zoning.
2
Mrs. B. F. Fairchild stated they had formed a Civic Organiza-
tion which borders North Kendall Drive to 120 Street from Red Road
-to Ludlam. She \~ished to turn in a resolution from the association,
all mer"bers objecting to this change of zoning.
BOA~' S ACTION
Re: Sun Investment Inc.'s application
Hr. Ferguson, seconded by Nr. Hardeman made a motion ¥!:lat
the Planning and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council tilat the
application of Sun Inves-tmen-t Inc. be denied for the reason this is
spot zoning, that there is no need for apartments in this area, and
no hardship shown.
****
Polled -Yes, 8
No, 1
Motion carried
lfrr. Ferguson, seconded by Mr. Paden made a motion to remove
from table the application of Bierbaum and Trabold for a change of
zoning of Lot 4 from RU-l to C-l: Lot 5 from RU-2 to C-l, McKeever
Terrace: Loca-tion -SI\! corner of S17 61 Avenue and Bird Road.
BOARD's Action
Re: Application being removed from table
Polled -Yes, 8
No, 1
Motion carried
Mr. Ferguson, seconded by Mr. Yakely made a motion that the
Planning and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council to deny this
application for C-l rezoning, as this is spot zoning, no hardship
shown,and no reason for commercial zoning at this time.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously
****
Mr. Yakely, seconded by Mr. Ferguson moved to adjourn, motion
carried. Meeting adjourned at 8:55 P. M.
Respectfully submitted,
Il(~(!~
Matilda Callan
PRESENT:
Absent:
****
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH MlAiH PLANNlNG AND ZONING BOARD
OCTOBER 9, 1962 AT CITY HALL AT 8 P .~1 •
Jack Stanton, Chairman
John Brau
Albert Corsiglia
Sidney Efronson
C. R. Gibbs
John Hardeman
i'lyron Keys
Carl Paden
Harold Yakely
James Ferguson
Thomas Foster (with permission)
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Keys moved that the minutes of
the regular meeting of September 25, 1962 be approved as prepared.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the
application of Jesse Brown, owner of Lot 62 University Park
Subdivision, for a variance on lot frontage and lot size to con-
struct a single family residence. Location 6520 S~! 57 Place;
Requirements 75 ft. -Proposed 60 ft.; Required Lot size 10,000 sq.
ft. -Proposed 6,000 sq. ft.
The Chairman informed the Board no letters of objection had
been received regarding this application. No objectors were present.
Jesse Brown explained to the Board that he had purchased
this lot several months ago; he had asked the BUilding Department
if they thought he could build on this lot, and the lady said she
thought he could. He said he wanted to build a single family home
for his wife and children; he had submitted 2 plans to the Building
Department and that the property had been SUI:'~yed ••
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: Jesse Brown's application
i'lr. Keys, seconded by Mr. Corsiglia made a motion that the
Planning and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the
application of Jesse Brown for variance be granted. lVIr. Keys said.
"a nice little house would be better than having a lot the re."
Polled -l'iotion carried unanimously
**** The Chairman brought forth for consideration, the handling
of the request of the City Council, a public hearing on rezoning of
areas from the west end of present commercial zoning on the south
1
side of Bird Road continuing in a westerly direction until reaching
the boundary of South ~1iami on the west.
The Chairman called for a special committee.
Mr. Keys chairman of this committee, who in turn will
members for this committee.
He appointed
select the
All members of the Board showed genuine interest in this
matter, and it was decided that this committee would make a study
of this area, a personal survey, sketches to be made; property
owners interviewed to learn if their properties were purchased for
speculation; obtain all pertinent facts; have Plr. CorSiglia check
with the Metro Planning and Zoning Department regarding their
future plans and ideas on their boundaries adjoining this area and
report his findings to the Board.
**** Remarks:
Mr. Keys asked if the Board could recommend to the City
Council to pass an ordinance allowing a lesser uses under the
C-I Zoning classification.
The Chairman stated the Board should ask the City Attorney
for his opinion before referring the recommendation to the Council.
****
The Board unanimously expressed their appreciation to the
City Manager in recognition of personalized note paper.
****
A unanimous request was made by the Board to the City
Manager that the secretary be retained for the Planning and
Zoning Board.
****
There being no further business before the Board, upon
motion to adjourn by Nr. Brau, seconded by Nr. Efronson, and
carried, the meeting adjourned at 8:40 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
J1I -h-/ / c-<A.A;'. ~LI'-
Nat Ida Callan
Secretary
/I .;/J l. ~&I-V.--,
PRESENT:
Absent:
****
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
OCTOBER 30, 1962 AT CITY HALL AT B P.M.
John Brau, Vice Chairman
Albert Corsiglia
C. R. Gibbs
John Hardeman, Jr.
Myrc;m Keys
Carl Paden
Harold Yakely
James Ferguson
Sidney Efronson
Thomas Foster (with permission)
Jack Stanton, Chairman
Mr. Yakely, seconded by Mr. Corsiglia, moved that the minutes
of the regular meeting of October 9, 1962, be approved as prepared.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the application
of Mario Urruela, owner of Lot 19, Grandview Park, for a variance to
allow an outside door in bedroom. Location, 5305 SW 67 Avenue.
Mr. Urruela stated he wanted to put in this outside door leading
into a patio and that eventually he would also put in a pool; that
thi~ is his family residence. He has lived here 13 years and had
already improved thi~ property in the amount of $14,000 as he wants
a nice place to live.
The Chairman called for any person in favor or any per~on present
objecting to this request.
Mr. Earnest Pippinger of 6519 SW 53 Terrace appeared in objection
to the request, stating once the City starts changing for variances, it
might start changing the code. ¥~. Pippinger is in construction work,
and has found on different deals the City of South Miami have been very
lenient. He does not see why there should be a change in the code, he
is against any variance change.
Mr. Ray Daley of 6551 sw 53 Terrace made an objection, but he
returned and wiShed to have his objection stricken from the record,
that he no longer objects.
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: Mario Urruela's application
Mr. GibbS, seconded by Mr. Ferguson, moved .that the request
of Mario Urruela be granted as stated, without reference to City
Council as this is obviously under Section 20.5 and the prerogative
of the Planning and Zoning Board.
NOTE: The City Attorney had advised the Board of this authDrity
under Section 20.5.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the application
of Therold S. Lindquist, Jr., owner of Lot 18, Avocado Homes, for a
variance to allow two outside doors to bedroom under construction.
Location -5958 SI", 60 Street.
Mr. Lindquist explained he would like to add these doors as this
is used for a studio. They now have to carryall materials and supplies
thru the living room area. It is not an addition to the house as an
entrance; it is not for rental purposes.
Mr. Paden asked if this was a private studio and Mr. Lindquist
replied that it 'vas strictly private.
The Chairman informed the Board of two le:tters received in favor
of granting this request. One from Albert Hurwitz, supervisor of art,
with Dade County schools and one from Chairman of art department at
the University of Miami.
The Chairman called for any parties present in favor or in objection.
Mr. Robert Benner of 5943 SO 60 Street, chief of research \-lith the
Planning and Zoning Board in the County said he recently purchased his
house in the neighborhood, and that he was anxious to express his
approval of this request, and t<1e need for it.
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: Therold Lindquist's application
Mr. Ferguson, seconded by Mr. Gibbs, moved that the request of
Therold Lindquist be granted as stated, without reference to the City
Council.
Polled -l'1otion carried unanimously
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the application
of Thomas F. Jardine, owner of Lots 1,2,3,24,25,and 26 of Block 1,
Westerfield Manor, Section 3, for a change of zoning for the purpose
of constructing a funeral home. Present zoning lots 1, 2 & 3 is C-l;
lots 24, 25, & 26 is RU-l; Proposed -C-2 or Special Use Permit.
Location -SE corner of S('! 59 Avenue and SI'1 40 Street; NE corner of
SW 59 Avenue and S\'J 41 Street.
Mr. Thomson represented lfrr. Jardine; he stated thi~ request is
identically the same application passed by the City Council December
1961, and "lhich -the City Council approved to allow a Special Use
Permit for this property, but that the 6 months period expired. He
appeared before the Council and requested an additional 6 months, how-
ever the City Council did not grant the extension for a number of
reasons; such as ingress and exits. l'1r. Thomson said they are willing
to go along with anything the City Council reasonably requires; that
they are seeking a C-2 or a Special Use Permit for the entire 6 lots.
Referring to a letter from Mr. Jones of the Metro Planning and Zoning
Board, lfrr. Thomson said he was glad to know that Metro sees fit to
allow commercial activity use on South Miami side of the road.
Mr. Keys asked if they had any plans made, and '''hy was the delay
on the original application granted by the Council. Mr. Thomson re-
plied the reasons '"ere personal and he did not want to go into any
discussion at this time. He said that we are now dealing \Vith zoning
or are "le dealing with special use permit; that any additional re-
quirements by the Planning and Zoning Board they \Vill try to comply.
He believes that some of the trouble stems from not clearly understanding
and for the Board to tell him just what they wan'l:, and in reply to
Mr. Keys ques'tion, they do not have plans made at this time. Mr. Thomson
knows the Ci-ty is concerned about the traffic, but he "lants to know
what the City requires.
Mr. Yakely recalled p~rts of lfrr. Jones letter regarding the
masonary \-lalls on 41 Street; landscaping etc., and that as Mr. Yakely
remembered the last application, the exits ,,,ould be in ,the rear.
Mr. Thomson said there was one on 59 Avenue and one in the rear,
tha-t he is not certain, but there "]Quld be no joining traffic on
Bird Road.
The Chairman informed the Board he had received letter of objection
from William E. Berkley. A letter from Roscoe H. Jones stating that if
the South Miami Planning and Zoning Board recommends approval of this
application, that consideration be given to requiring a 5' wall of
masonry to be used for parking lots; a 5' setback between the property
line and the wall to be planted "li-th grass and shrubs and/or flowers
and attractively maintained. All vehic1i!-lar entrance and exit points
be on SW 40 Street or ';;W 59 Avenue "litlilin 80' of the south right of
way line of 40 Street.
The Chairman called for anyone in favor or anyone present to voice
objection to the request.
3
Mr. VI. D. Stiles of 5818 SvJ 41 Street said he had objected to this
~n the past and he feels that i'c "ould be devaluating his property,
it ,'lould be very depressing in the neighborhood to have a funeral home
so close by, it would create a traffic hazard.
Mrs. Dobkin of 5858 SI": 40 Street objects, said there is a funeral
parlor one block away approved by Dade County. She had pruchased her
property as C-l, invested her money but ,',ould not have bought there
if she thought there would be ambulances and sirens, she strenously
objected to a funeral home in the neighborhood; her property is only
90' away from the Jardine property. In answer to l'rr. Gibbs question,
she replied 'chat she does live there now and that she purchased tlli",
property in 1954.
l'rr. Regina Fleischer of 5850 Bird Road said she objected for the
same reasons as her sister Mrs. Dobkin. She ,'!Qu1d not object to any
other business. In answer to l'lr. Gibbs question, she said she had
lived blere from 1953 until 2 years ago and that she is now living witl:
her sister D
J.IIlrs. ~·1. D. Stiles of 5815 SW 41 Street objects to the funeral home;
she is ill and has her 86yr old Mother livins with her, she wishes the
Board to consider her objections.
Mr. Thomson told the Board that a l'JI. Campbell is the neighbor
on Bird Road and a Mr. Parrish on 41 Street.
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: Thomas F. Jardine's application
Mr. Corsiglia, seconded by Mr. Yake1y, made a motion to table
this application due to the fact we do not have a set of plans which
is a requirement for a Special Use Permit.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on ·the application
of Paul R. Courtemanche, Otvner of L.:>t 22 Pincerest Villas, for a
variance on rear setback to permi,t the con.3truction of a Flo:i:ida room
and bath. Required setback 25', present setback 25.56', proposed
5.96', variance 19.04'. Location 77<10 SI'! 59 Court.
Mr. Courtemanche said he built this house in Janua ry 1954 and at
this time they only built in the one bathroom. They now have three
growing boys and really have a need for this Florida room and another
bathroom. This was the first house built on 'chis street. Mrs.
Courtemanche said this room ,,!Qu1d be air conditioned so that there
would not be any noise; their house is the most valuable wit ,in two
blocks. Mr. Courtmanche stated if they were allowed to build this
room, it ,,,ould be a high pitched roof so that it ",ill look like it has
4
always been part of the house.
The Chairman had received letters of objection from:
Mr. & Mrs. Fred Ribble; Betty Ross Cox of 7731 SW 61 Ave.
John L. Rouse, 6121 SvT 79 Street; George Se\vell. 5990 Svi 78 St.
Firs. John Earnest, Jr. of 5980 S\J 78 Street
The Chairman asked if anyone present was for this request, or
objecting to this request. No one appeared in response.
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: Paul R. Courtemanche's application
Mr. Keys, seconded by Mr. Corsiglia, made a motion that the
Planning and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that this
application be denied as the variance requested is too great and
would not be good planning in an RU-l neighborhood.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously
****
Mr. Gammage informed the Board regarding the condemned property
of Melvin Bieber. Notice had been served on Mr. Bieber, but Mr. Bieber
asked for a delay un-til April 12. lvjr. Gammage feels this building
should be torn down. The Board of Health inspector has been thru the
building and told Mr. Bieber that the water is polluted. Mr. Gammage
also told Mr. Bieber that the electricity is to be cut off~ this *(10-31)
electricity is used for the well water; Mr. Gammage says he will have
to get City water.
****
REMARKS:
Thomas Foster was home about three weeks ago for a week-end
and asked Mr. Keys to tell the Board members and Councilman Kline
that he was aski~g for them.
****
¥rr. Yakely asked if the notices for public hearing on rezoning
of Bird Road had been sent. Mr. Brau asked the City Manager if he
would check regarding these notices.
Mr. Keys said they were ready to make their report and had expected
to have the hearing November 13, 1962. Mr. Corsiglia had spoke to
Mr. Cook and will have his report.
****
The Board members discussed setting up a policy regarding Sec.
20.5 on the doors, so that the people do not have to go thru public
hearings, (per ¥rr. Hardie).
5,
Jvlr. Ferguson, seconded by JvJr. Keys made a motion that on one
family residence ,,,here a request for a door leading into a pool
or patio, the decision to be made by the Building Inspector, and
Should their be any question about the request, it could then be
brought before the Planning and Zoning Board, the request would
then be decided by the Board or the Bo rd could request a public
hearing be held.
****
Polled -Yes, 6
No, 2
Jvjotion carried.
There being no further business before the Board, upon motion
made by Jvlr. Keys, seconded by Jvlr. Yakely, motion carried. Jvleeting
adjourned at 9:40 P.M.
Present:
Absent:
****
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH MrAMI PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
NOVEMBER 13, 1962 AT CITY HALL AT 8 P.M.
Jack Stanton, Chairman
Albert Corsiglia
C. R. Gibbs
John V. Hardeman, Jr.
Myron Keys
Carl Paden
Harold Yakely
John Brau
Sidney Efronson
James Ferguson
Thomas Foster (with permL,sion)
Mr. Yakely, seconded by ~rr. Keys, moved that the minutes of the
regular meeting of October 30, 1962 be approved as individually read.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously.
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the application
of Stanley Kruszka, owner of the I'Test 132' of East 437' of Tract 2,
Palm Miami Heights, for a change of zoning from C-2 and RU-l to RU-4,
to allow an apartment house. Location -approximately 6231 SW 78 Street.
The Chairman read note of objection from Lillie Rose and H.V.M.
McGuirt of 6211 SW 79 Street. Letter of objection from the Reverend
Arthur J. Rantz as fOllows:
Dear Mayor Tevis:
If it were not for having to give the invocation at Vineland
Elementary Schocl, and attend a meeting of the Episcopal Church-women
in St. Thomas' Parish tonight, I would most certainly attend the meeting
concerning the rezoning proposed on Southwest 78 Street in South Miami.
This matter \vas brought to our attention once before and I
wrote to you telling you that my mother purchased property at 6220 S,1
78 Street and assured at the time that the "treet would be kept residen-
tial. Having confidence in what was told her she placed what small
saving she had in her property, and of course with thi" proposed plan
for rezoning not only she, but a number of her neighbors are deeply
distressed.
I tru.;-t you and members of the City Council will keep in mind
the trust that all of Ud \"ho are leaders in the community must uphold,
and that is interest in and concern for the people W:10 come under our
care and protection. Please do all in your pO<;ler to uphold the trust
and faith we all place in you and elected members of the City Council.
\'lith continued good wL;hes to you and members of the Council
in all the good work that you do, I am
Most sincerely,
/s/ Arthur J. Rantz
The Rev. Arthur J. Rantz B.D.
St. Thomas' Episcopal Church
The Chairman read the following letter from Joseph E. Gula, Jr.
Mr. Chairman and Members of -the Zoning Board:
I shall be unable to attend the Public Hearing on November 13,
concerning the rezoning application of Mr. Stanley Kruszka's property
located at 6231 Sh' 78 Street, South Miami.
Ny scheduled work at the time of the hearing will not permit
me to be present and I trust that thici letter will be con"idered in my
behalf.
It is my undeBstanding that Mr. Krus4ka, the present owner, is
having the said property rezoned for the purpose of enabling him to sell
the property. No doubt, there zoning action would increase the land
value should the proposed zoning change to RU-4 take place.
The RU-4 classification is to be for an apartment type struc-
ture. Will the physical dimnesions of the property govern the type of
structure to be erected? If the prop~sed rezoning to RU-4 incorporate
multiple story type structure, then my vote in this matter is definite NO.
The multiple type story apartments such as were constructed be-
tween 79 and 80 Street and West of 63 Street rather Ave. may have en-
hanced the locale's beautification, however, from the standpoint of near-
by residents of 78, 79 and 80 S-treets, concerning the \"elfare of the
residents, namely tl,e substantial increase of vehicular traffic and the
abuse of some of the operators of these vehicles created a nuisance pro-
blem in form of racing tLese vehicles at high speeds, "gunning" them be-
yond the average sound level of normal operation as well as leaving the
shrilling effect of squeeling and burning tires of "jack-rabbit" starts.
This area of the community i3 gradually loosing its serene aspect of the
residential habitat.
In as much as this is a residential area and ,"e wish to remain
it to be so, i-i: is my contention that the above metioned noise problem
will be prevalent in thi~ area unless the restriction of the building
expansion is imposed upon in a form of one story type apartments if such
con~ideration is to warrant any zoning change to RU-"1.
Therefore, in my behalf, not to be in the way of progress I
would be in accord to permit one story type structure~ to be erected on
the premises, thusly, my vote would be YES. With provi~ions, that a
suitable \vall not more than 4 feet in height should be erected facing
the 78 Street. Also, appropriate speed limit signs should be posted
on 78 Street as the area population consists of a good number of children.
The 78 Street should be widened in -the area adjacent and ~!est to lVlr.
Kruszka's property as the existing \·,id-i:h of the Street permits a passage
for one car only in either direction. With an increase in vehicular
traffic, this will have to be eventually accomplished.
I trust that the above mentioned considerations shall be entered
in my behalf at this hearing. I thank you.
/s/ Joseph E. Gula, Jr.
Mr. George Thomson, representing IVJr. Kruszka, said he had counted
22 people on the list (for hearing notification) and only 2 objectors.
As some of this property is C-2 other RU-l, the amount of property C-2
is not enough to be concerned about, l2~' bet>veen there and Dixie High-
>vay. There is 289-:-x 132' on thi..; property which is quite a piece of
property. This property does not lend to single family residents. What
the applicant proposes to do, pending on the outcome of this meeting,
is to build 35 unit modern designed apartment house; $300,000 might be
put into this property. Looking directly to the rear is the shopping
center, 62 Avenue; with the Elks Club, Royal Castle and the Nursery,
blis neighborhood at the present time is more commercial than residential.
Any dedication on 78 Street >vill be made if the result of this hearing
is favorable to the applicant.
The Chairman asked for anyone present in favor of this request,
or anyone opposed.
Mr. Lee Taylor, 6240 SW 78 Street, immediately south of this property
is interested in having this request granted, as the apartment house
would be a good buffer strip; that any piece of property might go in there
and this way he would know it would be an apartment house. Mr. Taylor
had been before the Planning and Zoning Board on May 29 for a change of
zoning on his property, but had been advised his request "JaS rejected.
He stated he had this property sold 3 times if he could get a committment
from the Federal Housing, bU-i: due to the zoning and the vacant land in
that vicinity, it was rejected by the Federal Housing. He is in favor of
this apartment house.
-3-
Mrs. Lillie Rose l'1cGuirt, 6211 sr',) 79 Street said she came into
this area 5 year;; ago with the understanding that '"e were in a one
family lot. From time to time they have been required to continue
to Protest to these variances. They have had to call the pOlice for
protection of cars racing up and dOvlD that ;;treet. She can't under-
stand why those 1} lots which were sold for one family residents should
be rezoned, nor why we have to fight abou'c this property. The people
on 78 Street face a nice clean wall; they have not complained about
the parking area in back of Food Fair becau~e it is rarely used. Look-
ing to the west, we see the nursery and we do not object to the greenery;
everything going south is nice vlell kept little homes; ;;he doeci not ciee
why they have to fight to keep trio as it is and hopes the Board will
give them consideration.
Mr. Richard Spinning, 6221 SW 79 Street says the only objection is
the traffic; the two apartments that have gone up are beauties and no one
can give a guarantee on commercial property. The traffic is my objection,
if there were speed limits on 78 Street as it seems like 78 Street has
become a thrill way; thi;; is primarily my objection to any more of these
apartments g<i1ing thru; if this could be stopped, I would not mind an
apartment going up. The buildings tLat are there nm., are well taken
care of and well graded. He thinks that the City in a way should be
obligated when residential streets have to be cu't thru, as it does increase
the traffic. He has called the poli,-,e about the traffic at various times.
From DiEie Highway to Elks Club is very narrow and most of this traffic,
if thi;; apartment goes tbru, will be going thru there.
Mr. Bober of 6251 SH 79 Street said he has ti1e same complaint about
the traffic and the noise.
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: Stanley Kruszka's applica'tion
l'Ir. Keys, seconded by Mr. Gibbs, made a motion that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the variance be
granted with the condition that the front or first 25' facing S('J 78 Street
be landscaped and present trees left, and parking prohibited in thi;;
25' area.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously
****
The Chairman received additional information from Paul R. Courtemanche
regarding the variance he had requested October 30, 1962. He advised the
Board he had cut the propo;;ed Florida room down to 18' wLich leave;; 7'7.'.
He submitted a li~t of 16 names of people who do not object to the pro-
posed Florida room and bath. He also placed two photographs of the hou.;e
on file with the Board.
Mr. Jordan Pfuntner, 5991 Sl'e 79 Street stated he had 'calked to 6
previous objectors and that they had no real objection, only two objected
1}
to noise. Mr. Pfuntner believes he has more noise than anyone around
there and hopes the Board will allow this variance.
BOARD'S ACT! ON
Re: Paul R. Courtemanche
Mr. Yakely, seconded by Mr. Hardema~made a motion that the
Planning and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the applicatioi.
of Paul R. Courtemanche for a variance of 18' to permit the construction
of a Florida room and bath be granted.
****
****
Polled -Yes, 4
No, 3
Application placed on table
Tabled application of Thomas F. Jardine -remains on table.
Mr. Cotton spoke before the Board, regarding his property on
Red Road. He gave his reasons for filing h~petition to have his
property taken into the City of South Miami. Mr. Cotton also gave the
P~3rd the changes that would be necessary in order to use this property
for terraced garden apartment with court yard in the center.
All Board members with the exception of Mr. Keys, who abstained,
a~proved of taking this 3 acres of land into the City.
****
~he~Chairman and Board members requested the secretary to answer
letter from Metro Planning and Zoning Board on public hearing of
county property within 100' of South Miami boundaries. The Planaing
and Zoning Board of South Miami have no objection to change of zoning
on Metro public hearing #62-11-34.
There being no further business before the Board, meeting adjourned
at 9:18 P.M., after motion duly made, seconded and carried.
5
Present:
Absent:
****
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH MIh~I PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
NOVEMBER 27, 1962 AT CITY HALL AT 8 P.M.
Jack Stanton, Chairman
John Brau
Sidney Efronson
James Ferguson
C. R. Gibbs
John V. Hardeman, Jr.
Myron Keys
Carl Paden
Harold Yakely
Thomas Foster (with permission)
Mr. Paden, seconded by Mr. Brau, moved that the minutes of the
regular meeting of November 13, 1962 be approved as individually read.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the application
of Charles Ivanik, owner of Lots 25, 26, 27 Block 7, Westerfield Manor,
Sec. 1 & 2, for a change of zoning to permit a combination hardware and
grocery store. RU-l to proposed C-l; location, approx. 4250 Red Road.
The Chairman stated he had received a petition of objection with
93 signatures; telefax from John E. Vincent, Secretary of Coral Gables
Zoning Board that their Board unanimously objects to the proposed change
of zoning; letter of objection from Charles Corbett.
The Chairman asked if Mr. Ivanik was present or anyone present
representing Mr. Ivanik.
Mrs. Florence Boss represented Mr. Ivanik who is ill and in ill
health. She stated he owned this property for several years, paid
taxes, and now wanted to make a living from it; Red Road is a main
artery and no place to build a residence, due to noise, traffic and
is only good for business. This business he would operate himself.
The Chairman asked if anyone else present wished to speak in favor
of this request. There being none, the Chairman asked for any objectors
present.
Approximately 50 people were present; the Chairman asked for a
spokesman appointed by the group.
1
Mr. Corbett of 5741 SW 42 Terrace titated his objections: There are
3 large grocery stores, one hardware store, and several other stores
that sell hardware in the Red Bird Shopping area, which is \vithin 500
or 600 feet of the proposed area. There are 3 or 4 stores now vacant
in the Red Bird shopping area; there are a number of vacant lots on
Bird near Red that have been zoned for butiinesci purposes and could be
utilized \vi thout rezoning the additional residential property. It
would create a traffic hazard; endanger the liveti of children from the
Fairchild school which adjoins the property in quecition. This business
area has reached its peak -~ with the ne\\I Dadeland, South Miami business
district, the 67 and Bird shopping area, many stores are closed. The
rezoning of this particular property would adversely affect the property
in the neighborhood and would result in a net loss in taxes to South
Miami and Dade County. From 42 south, there are any number of houses
on both sides.
Mr. Bill Gray of 1521 Garcia, Coral Gables which is 400' from
property in question. The lots are only 90' deep, I do not see how
Mr. Ivanik can put any type of building there for business, and still
have parking in front; all strip zoning of a commercial area, in the
middle of a particular residential area is frowned upon. It is unfair to
give one person an economic gain at the expease of all surrounding
property owners. The zoning laws are to protect all. Mr. Ivanik
could sell this property and live off the proceeds with an investment.
Mr. Ivanik was deeded this property in 1954 by Circuit court file
DD 65857.
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: Charles L. Ivanik's application
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Keys, moved that the Blanning and
Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the applicatiun be
denied because of non~conforming use.
Polled -Motion ·carried unanimously
Mr. Yakely had requested amendments to original motion of Mr. Brau
for denial, to elaborate on various reasons. After much discussion,
these amendments were voted on and failed to carry and then the original
motion of Mr. Brau was amended by Mr. Brau to "tate, "non-conforming use."
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the application
of Alfred D. Lewis, owner of the \'/lz of the NEl:, of the N~ll:, of the swl:,
of Section 24-54-40 less the E 66 feet thereof, for a change of zoning
to allow a t\vo-story Garden Apartment House. Present zoning -RU-l;
proposed RU-4, location 6450 SW 48 Street.
The Chairman asked if anyone was precient in favor of this request.
2
The Chairman had been informed by Mr. Gammage of the Building
Department that Mr. Lewis asked to withdraw his application at this
time.
The Chairman stated there would be a public hearing, the hearing
had been paid for; the people had been notified and lfrr. Lewis was
entitled to it.
Upon the call for objectors, many hands were raised and the Chair-
man asked tha't a spokesman be appointed for the group, as it would be
impossible to hear all of them.
Mr. Roger Ed'vards represented a group and filed a petition for
denial from ,the people who live in the City and also in the surrounding
county with some 220 names. He displayed aerial chart and pictures
of the property and surrounding propertie~. Thi~ request for RU-4, in
such zoning not only is a garden apartmen't allowed, but thi~ i.; South
Miami zoning for hotels and commercial interests, pert "nent to a hotel
structure. Naturally, this would be detrimental to the people in
ques,tion. He understood ,that r.lr. Gammage had letter of withdrawal, and
asked that ,the Board not to 'cake it off the agenda. The people would
like a ruling on this matter and would appreciate the Board's considera-
tion.
BOARD'S ACT:DON
Re: Alfred D. Lewis' application
Mr. Paden, seconded by Mr. Gibbs, moved that the Planning and
Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the application of
Alfred D. Lewis be denied because there has been no demonstrated
need for a change of zoning in this area.
Polled -Yes, 8
2 Abstained (participation by phone calls)
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing before the Planning
and Zoning Board to consider the rezoning of areas from the west end of
present commercial zoning on the south ~ide of Bird Road, continuing
in a westerly direction until reaching the boundary of South Miami on
the west. Location between S:'i 61 Avenue and SW 64 ,venue , for Lots 1
thru 5 Block 2, McKeever Terrace, Lots 1 thru 5 Block 1, McKeever Terrace
Lots 1 thru 11 Block 1, Bird Road Estates and Lots 1 thru 24, Block 2,
Bird Road Estates.
The Chairman asked if anyone present representing request for the
rezoning.
Mr. Thomson, representing Mr. Trabold, stated he wished to high-
light about 4 points and ask the Board if they have any question in
3
behalf of his applicant. There isnt anything that he can say to the
Board that he has not already said in the past 3 or 4 times. We all
understand "that Bird Road was an aerterial highway, at least in his
opinion and rather un-realio;tic zoning between that time and nm". We
have had a couple of law suits, one master plan, and several other
factoJ5s that came into play here. Nevertheless, we still have the
RU-2 20naing on Bird Road. No in3titution will lend any money for
any kind of residential construction over there. To his knowledge,
and he may stand corrected, there has been one new home constructed
in the past S years in the area immediately in question. On any kind
of application that came up on Or near Bird Road, the County would
register its objec"tion, but he can stand here and shm", beyond question
that three million dollars '"Jorth of commercial construction, that the
County has put up in the "time they had objected to any corone rcial
development in the South Miami Area.
Mr. Trabold was asked if he had a plan for development of this
property and he replied he had a proposition at the present time for
a restaurant. He would be glad to construct any building that will
meet the zoning conditions of the City of South Miami. Mr. Trabold
advised that he owned Lots 4 and 5, Blk 2 of McKeever Terl1ace.
The Chairman asked for anyone in the audience as objector to this
request. Approximately 20 people present as objectors. The Chairman
said he would hear f few.
Mr. Lewis Sehnke, Vice President of the Hope Luthern Church, 6300
Bird Road, represented 400 people 1,,,ho strenously objected to a change
of zoning. They will be breaking ground for a new sanctuary in January,
and this would not be fitting to have more business places open on
Sunday when they are trying to have the present stores closed that day.
Pastor Stattlander substantiated what Mr. Sehnke said. He hopes
the Board will continue to be sympathic to them, as the Board has in
the past, and deny the request for rezoning.
Mrs. Smith, 6234 SW 42 Street stated they want to keep this
reSidential, that stores at Bird and Ludlam, less than half a mile
away, cant keep bU6iness, many are empty, so why should there be one
to ,,,reck this neighborhood and then meet the same fate.
Mr. H. W. Steele, 6315 SI'1 42 Street stated his objections are on
file from previous years. They appreciate the Board's consideration
and should the Board have to rezone due to maybe a court action as
happened before, they v!Quld appreciate the minimum of rezoning.
Mrs. A. E. Breitenstein of 4023 SW 62 Avenue, and Mr. Henry Heineman
of 6382 SW 38 Street, member of Hope Lutheran were also heard. John
Stevenson of 5221 SW 104 Avenue, member of the Church, stated the traffic
condition would be dangerous to the children that attend their kinder-
4 garten.
Mr. Irving Zimmerman lives in the Kendall area but is owner of
a corporation that he controls, this is Lot 26 Block 2 of Bird Road
Estates at 6387 S\'J 41 Street, which backs up to thic; proposed rezoning.
He objects to the rezoning on moral principles, but if this rezoning
goes thru, he will be before the Board with a petition to rezone his
property for a duplex.
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: Rezoning of Bird Road as stated
Vtr. Efronson, seconded by Mr. Gibbs, made a motion to table this
hearing for the purposes of the Chairman of this committee designating
a committee for further study of existing circumstances, and to suggest
in their report what should be done to avoid a confusion of zoning in
this area. Report to be made wi·thin one month.
Polled -Yes 9
No 1
Motion carried
We wish the Council to know, Vtr. Keys and members of his committee,
made a thorough study of rezoning Bird Road, made an excellent oral
repor·t to the Board accompanied by a complete drawing of the area. Due
to the complexity of the existing zoning, the sizes of the lots involved,
and the opinions of each member which were discussed and evaluated by
the other members, the Chairman resolved this matter would require more
study on the part of the Board. The ne," committee ,·,ill avail themselves
of all the pertinent information obtained by the former committee.
The new commi·ttee appointed by Chairman Stanton:
James Ferguson, Chairman; Colonel C. R. Gibbs
John Brau Jack Stanton
****
The Chairman read the notice on the tabled application of
Paul Courtemanche, owner of Lot 22 Pincerest Villas, for a variance on
rear setback to permit the constructLm of a Florida room and bath.
Required setback 25' present setback 25.56' proposed variance 5.96'
variance 19.04' located at 7740 SW 59 Court.
Mr. Courtemanche appeared before the Board on November 13, 1962
with additional information. He advised the Board, he had cut the
proposed Florida room down to 18' which leaves 7!;,', two photographs
of the hou.3e were filed with the Board at this appearance, and a list
of 16 names of people who do not object to the proposed construction.
Mr. Yakely made a motion, seconded by Mr. Hardeman that the variance
be granted, hm·,ever, motion failed to carry by 4 to 3 and thereby
being placed on the table.
After much discussion, the members were called for a motion to be
made by the Chairman. 5
•
BOARD'S ACTION
Re: Paul Courtemanche's application
Mr. Kyes, seconded by Mr. Efronson, made a mo-tion tha-c the
Planning and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the
application of Mr. Courtemanche be denied.
****
Polled -Yes, 7
No, 3
Motion carried
The Chairman 3aid the -tabled application of Thomas F. Jardine
will be left on the table as 'ole are waiting for information on thi3.
****"
Remarks:
Mr. Brau asked Mr. Gammage abou-t the used furniture store on Red
Road -,-,hat basis they are allowed 'co operate, as other businesses
had been turned down at that loca-tion, due to paving and drainage.
Upon learning this Antique Shop does not have a certificate of
occupancy, !-lr. Brau asked City Manager Bar-ton to look into this, as
this is wrong, and someone should give it attention.
Mr. Keys offered the map to the ne'" committee, this map was made
by his daughter. Colonel Gibbs presented ¥~. Keys with a silver dollar
for Miss Keys, for a job well done.
Mr. Efronson remarked he enjoyed this meeting tremendously, as
there had been so much though-t into all the matters this evening.
Colonel Gibbs suggested that the Board get dO\vn to some real
planning and zoning, that he feels we are doing too much spot zoning,
consideration of blocks and not the individual problem. With the
report that the City had made some -time ago, the master plan, if part
or all is good, for the Planning and Zoning Board adopt it, whatever
part we can use, ,ve should take advantage of, and amend the parts that
cannot be used. If it cant be u3ed, then get one that ,-;e can use, we
should have a plan, this is our job.
Mr. Ferguson sta-ted we ,,,ould have to get the people interested
in the plan, because no plan is good unless you have the people buy
the plan, you must get the people interested in planning.
There being no further business before the board, upon motion made
by Mr. Paden, seconded by Mr. Brau, and carried, meeting adjourned at
10:30 P. M.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
JANUARY 8, 196) AT CITY HALL AT 8 P.M.
Present: Jack Stanton, Chairman
John Brau
****
Albert Corsiglia
Sidney Efronson
Thomas Foster
C. R. Gibbs
John V. Hardeman, Jr.
Myron Keys
Carl Paden
Edward C. Vining, Jr.
Harold Yakely
James Ferguson also attended meeting
Mr. Paden, seconded by Mr Keys, moved that toe minutes of
the regular meeting of November 27, 1962 be approved as individually
read, with correction thereto -Albert Corsiglia's name was omitted
from the list of members present.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously
"/.-':!:!ti
The Chairman, with the Board members approval, permitted
Mr. Hoffman of the Hope Lutheran Church to speak regarding the
strip zoning on Bird Road. The Chairman advised Mr. Hoffman, and
his group, that this will not be considered a public hearing, and
will not be made part of the record.
Pastor Stattlander expressed his appreciation to the Board
in behalf of Mr. Hoffman being heard.
****
The tabled item of Mr. Jardine remains on the table, as no
further information or action has been received or requested.
****
Mr. Ferguson gave an oral report on the Bird Road zoning matter.
The Bird Road map prepared for this Board was displayed for clarifi-
cation of Mr. Ferguson's report.
After a lengthly discussion on the various depths, widths, sizes
of lots, location relevant to each particular lot and property, and
the present hodge-podge zoning in this area -Mr. Efronson, seconded
by Mr. Yakely, moved that the Board table this matter, pending a
written report from the committee.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously
Jan. 8. 1963
o ••
****
Mr. Efronson, and the Board members welcomed Mr. Foster back
on the Board.
****
Mr. Keys requested that notices of public hearings be sent to
each Board member, the same day the notices are sent to property
owners. These notices will prepare the members to be better informed
when called upon to answer questions from said property owners.
****
Mr. Foster said he was glad to be back to the "City of Pleasant
Living", and that in his travels, he saw zoning that makes him feel
the Planning and Zoniog Board of South Miami is doing a good job.
****
Colonel Gibbs, seconded by Mr. Keys made a motion that the Board
recommend to the City Council, that some action be taken regarding
the hazardous and undesirable conditions on the narrow un-dedicated
streets in the City; if possible to complete the cut-thru and paving
of these streets.
Polled -Motion carried unanimously
... ~.***
The Chairman expressed toe Board's appreciation to Mr. Ferguson
for serving with the Planning and Zoning Board. Mr. Ferguson said
he would be glad to help with his services at any time.
~';***
Mr. Paden, seconded by Mr. Corsiglia, moved to adjourn. Motion
carried unanimously; meeting adjourned at 9:15 P.M.
Jan. 8, 1963
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
****
MINUTES OF 'l'HE REGULAR tfiEETING OF THE
SOUTH llIAIlI PLAl\'NING AND ZONING BOARD
JANUARY 14, 1963, AT CITY HALL, 8:00 P.M.
Jack Stanton, Chairman
James Bmoman
Sidney Efronson
C. R. Gibbs
Myron Keys
Carl Paden
J. C. Shz""
Dr. C.D. Tharp
Edward C. Vining, Jr.
Harold Yakely
Thc:uas I}'. Fo'3 ter
Mr. Yakely, seconded by Hr. Keys, moved that the minutes
of the regular rr.eetj.ng of December 10, 1963, be adopted as
individually read. ~:.:>t'_cn carried unanimously.
****
The Chairman react ti1e notice of public hearing on the appli-
cation of Dal-Long, Inc., as the representative was not present,
the chairman suggested the 3c2rd consider the next item on the
agenda; this met "i th the Board's approval.
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the appli-
cation of Aluxander vi. Alvin, owner of S~ of SE~ of SE~ of SE~
less West 340', Section 26-54-40, for a change of zoning to per-
mit an apartreent house. Present zoning EU-l; proposed RU-4;
Location NW corner of Sunset Drive and ~W 67 Avenue.
Letter of approv21 for rezoning the above property was received
from John L. Bridges. Bill Alvin represented the owner, stating
they would like to pnt the property to use and whatever dedications
required would be ::-.ct by the O":7ner. Hrs. LiVelli and Mr. Wedemeyer
spoke in favor of the ap!)lication, the latter with reservations.
The following objectors ":;ere heard at this time: Ronald
Singerman 6821 SV7 66 l\·Jerne, Er. St2.JTh"ll of 6740 SW 69 Terrace,
Dr. Chauser of 6760 S\"J 69 Terrace, Mrs. R. H. Higgins of 6816
SW 68 Street, Allan Abess of 6721 SW 69 Terrace, Mrs. Murray
Sheppard, Jim King o:E 6::41 SW 66 Avenue, Walter Lippman of
1-14-64
6780 SW 69 Terrace, Joseph Wierzowski of 6259 SW 70 Street,
Grady Barrs of 6760 SW 68 Terrace, Violet Allee of 6701 SW
69 Terrace, M. G. Malti of 7132 SW 65 Avenue, and Bill
Nunberg of 7049 SW 66 Avenue. Main objections being traffic
hazard and the desire to keep the area residential.
No letters of objection were received and all the objectors
present are not within the 300' area of notification.
After considerable discussion, Mr. Efronson, seconded by
Mr. Yakely moved to table the application. Polled: Yes, 7:
No, 2.
City Manager Barton suggested "town-house classification".
The Chairman appointed the City Manager a committee of one to
secure available information on this classification for the
Planning and Zoning Board members.
The Chairman appointed Mr. Keys, Chairman: Dr. C. D. Tharp,
and Mr. Shaw as a committee to study this area and make a
report to the Board as soon as possible.
****
The Dal-Long, Inc., application was considered at this time,
for variances to permit the construction of an apartment house
on L~ts 4, 15 and Lot 14 less West 3' of Block 14, located at
6129 SW 70 Street. Required: 100' front, 15' side setback:
proposed 97' .front., "-10' west side and 7l;;' east side setbacks.
The Chairman asked for a ruling from the City Attorney, to
hold public hearing at this time as notice of public hearing was
incorrect. Previous scheduled public hearing of November 26,
1963 was deferred due to incorrect public notice. The City
Attorney ruled the hearing could be held at this time.
George Baker Thomson, representing the owner stated there
has been no improvement in this area in the last 25 years. The
construction proposed will improve the entire area. There will
be 22 units with 20 parking spaces and enough land for 25 to 28
parking spaces. The B~ass Key apartments are within 150' of
this proposed apartment house.
Mr. Wedemeyer said he had not received notice of hearing
and has 4 lots on 61 Court, within the 300' notification area.
Mr. Wedemeyer does not object to the apartment at this location.
Joseph Wierzowski of 6259 SW 70 Street does not object.
Letter-of approval received from: J. H. Dye of
2 1-14-64
6005 SI'l 70 Street. Letters of objection were received from
James Dowling of 6140 SI-I 69 Street, Alice Inman of 7020 SW
61 Avenue, Shellie Moorer 6150 SV) 69 Street, I. Moskowitz
6145 SW 69 Street, B.a. l'Iillis 6144 SW 69 Street, Archie and
Louise Freelove 7000 SliJ 61 Avenue, Elizabeth J. Broomfield of
6140 SI'l 70 Street, David and Christine B~ooks 6184 SI'I 70 Street,
P.D. and Anna A. Loyless of 7109 SI'I 61 Court. Mr. Loyless told
the Board it was his understanding a hardship must be shown for
the granting of a variance and further understands that the
~djacent property can be purchased.
After a lengthly discussion, Mr. Paden, seconded by Mr.
Yakely, moved that this item be postponed until the next
regular meeting~ Polled: Yes, 10; No, O.
****
The repprt of the Committee on recently annexed Parcels
No. 3 and No.4, interim zoning is as follows:
PARCEL #3 Grigsby Manor PB 58/67 and Replat 66/109 fronts
on SVJ 77 Terrace running east from SI'I 67 Avenue is zoned RU-l
under County Classification. It is recommended that this
Parcel be zoned RU-l under the South Miami Code.
PARCEL #4 Davis Manor, PB 51/41 Block 4, this parcel is
the nortDeast corner of S\'J 80 Street and SI'I 67 Avenue. Lot 1
zoned RU-5 and Lots 2 and 3 zoned RU-l. Lot 1 is improved
with a professional-medical building. It is recommended by
the Committee that this Parcel be zoned as follows:
Lot 1 of Block 4 be zoned RU-5 under South Miami Code
Lots 2 and 3 of Block 4 be zoned RU-l under the
South Miami Code.
This Committee predicated its decisions on the basis that
annexed land should be brought into the City under the same
or comparable zoning classification as it held in the County.
Should any owner wish a change, they can follow the customary
procedure for requesting such change as they might wish.
Respectfully submitted
John 1'1. Brau, Chairman
Thomas T. Foster
C. R. Gibbs
Mr. Yakely, seconded by Mr. Efronson, moved that the Board
accept the report of the Commi·ttee. Polled: Yes, 10; ; No, O.
3 1-14-64
Mr. Brau submitted a formal recommendation to the Board
for the numbering of public hearings, decisions, etc.
After approval by the Board, the Chairman instructed the
Building Department to use this form for all future public
hearings and to take into consideration the numbering sequence.
This form is patterned after Dade County form.
****
Mr. Efronson wished to welcome Dr. Tharp to the Planning
and Zoning Board.
Mr. Paden asked for assistance on the report of parking
spaces for apartments, which was previously requested by the
Board.
The Chairman appoin·ced the following members to the Committee:
l>:1r. Paden, Chairman, Mr. Keys, Mr. Gibbs and Mr. Vining.
There being no further business before the Board, meeting
adjourned at 10:50 p.m., upon motion duly made, properly seconded,
and carried unanimously.
4 1-14-64
Present:
****
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
FEBRUARY 12, 1963 AT CITY HALL AT 8 P.M.
Jack Stanton, Chairman
John Brau
Albert Corsiglia
Sidney Efronson
Thomas Foster
C. R. Gibbs
John V. Hardeman, Jr.
Myron Keys
Carl Paden
Edward C. Vining, Jr.
Harold Yakely
Mr. Brau, seconded by Colonel Yakely, moved that the minutes
of the regular meeting of January 22,1963, be approved as individually
read.
Polled: Motion carried unanimously
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the applicati0~
of Alfred D. Lewis, owner of Lot 34, Sunrise Estates, First Addition
PB 75/19, for a variance on front setback for the purpose of erecting
a residence. Required -25' setback; Proposed -15'; location -
5260 Sl'i 64 Court.
Mr. Lewis could not be present, however, Mr. Bram of 5809 SW
64 Place, an associate of Mr. Lewis, explained the variance was
requested in order to build a residence with an East exposure, for
a buyer who had already placed a deposit with Mr. Lewis. He informed
the Board no other lot was available with an East exposure. This
variance would leave 23' to the main part of the house and 15' to the
garage area.
The Chairman called for anyone present in favor of this variance,
there being none, the Chairman called fer any Gb}ec~ present.
Mr. Ken Kemper, attorney for Dr. Herbert Levin of 5305 SW 64 Court,
across the street from the proposed variance location objects to ±he
variance being granted. It would spoil the appearance of the Street,
as all houses that have been built have been set back the proper
distance, and are in the $40,000 to $50,000 bracket.
Mr. Kane of 5221 SW 64 Court objected to a variance being granted,
2/12/63
when they bought their horne. they were told a park would be built
on the plot of land opposite their home; this land was owned by the
City of Miami. the park never materialized. then this land across
the street was levelled and all these smaller houses were being built.
these houses are not near the value of our homes, Now they want a
variance;to set a house closer to the street. which will further
distract the appearance of the neighborhood.
John Brau. seconded by Colonel Yakely. moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend this request be denied.
Mr. Foster suggested an amendment to this motion be made. stating
this problem was discussed with ~~. Lewis before and all the facts
pointed out to Mr. Lewis who agreed he could set up a house on every
lot in regards to shape. size. and water line, when plat was approved.
This amendment being agreeable with the Board members was made
by Mr. Foster. seconded by Mr. Paden. to the original motion for
denial by Mr. Brau. seconded by Colonel Yakely.
****
Polled -Yes. 10
Abstained 1
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the application
of Martin Brothers. Inc .• prospective owners of Lots 2 and 3. Field
Villas. PB 47/98. for a change of zoning and variance to permit the
construction of a professional building and parking lot for building.
Present zoning RU-l. proposed RU5 for Lot 2; Present zoning RU-l on
Lot 3. proposed -variance to permit parking. Locations respectively
7520 SW 57 Avenue and 7511 SW 57 Court.
Mr. Paul Martin represented the Martin Brothers. he stated
this building directly to the South of the 7500 Building would be
of similiar construction and comparable to the existing buildings.
The parking would be in the rear on Lot 3. therefore. only a variance
for parking was needed. This land would be landscaped and a wall
erected. whatever would be rquired by the Building Department.
Mr. Mondlick. owner of the Shore Building. specifically wished
to go on record in favor of this request. The addition of this
building will be welcome in the area.
Mrs. Betty Kowalchwick of 7510 SW 57 Court. new owner of lot
facing the proposed parking lot. does not object to this request.
as Mr. Martin had explained about the landscaping. etc .• but. she
wanted to know if the change was made. if she could expect a business
next door. The Chairman said tlUs Board will not put business back
2/12/63
there. The intention of the Board is to protect the citizens.
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Vining, moved to table this application
until the next regular meeting, at which time the the particular
restrictions of parking on the Shore Building will be reviewed in
relation to this application.
Polled: Motion carried unanimously.
***
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the application
of Elizabeth Sheff, owner of Lots A and B, West Larkin Park, PB 12/49,
for a variance on lot frontage and size for the purpose of erecting
two houses. Required 75' frontage, proposed 63'; 10,000 sq ft, pro-
posed 9,450 sq ft. Location: Lot A, 7851 sw 69 Avenue; Lot B, 7850 SW
68 Avenue.
Mr. Samson Pederson of 205 Aragon Avenue, represented Mrs. Sheff.
He stated there was no chance to obtain land on either side, that the
people on each side have been wanting to buy part of this property for
their homes. Mrs. Sheff does not intend to build, but wIshes. ro sell
this property.
Dr. Sykes, resident and owner of the property immediately South
of this location, would be interested in purchasing this property, all
or half of it, and would beautify the property. Dr. Sykes is in favor
of this request.
Mr. Gardner of SW 69 Avenue stated he was in favor of this request.
Mr. Keyes, seconded by Mr. Corsiglia, moved the Board recommend
to the City Council that Variance be allowed as to the frontage, due
to the fact -there is 600' property depth, they can increase the depth
of the lot to get 10,000 sq ft required without requesting any variance
on the 10,000 sq ft. Therefore, the motion is for the variance of 12'
frontage.
Polled: Yes, 9
No, 2
Mr. Foster inquired if a variance had been requested on the
property of Charlie Bieber now being built at 5965 SW 76 Street. Mr.
Gammage told the Board the former building had been condemned and had
been torn down, and when buildings were condemned and removed, you
had to allow the property owner to rebuild.
The Chairman asked the City Attorney for his opinion on this
matter of -'variances, setbacks, etc. on condemned property.
2/12/63
Mr. Hardie said the fact of condemnation does not give the
right ·(:0 build anything.
The Chairman asked Mr. Gammage to take this up with the City
Manager, in the interest that the building will conform with the
zoning rule.
There being no further business before the Board, the meeting
adjourned at 9:30 P.M., upon motion made by Mr. Brau, seconded by
Mr. Keys, and carried.
Present:
Absent:
****
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
FEBRUARY 26, 1963 AT CITY HALL AT 8 P.M.
Jack Stanton, Chairman
John Brau
Albert Corsiglia
Thomas Foster
C. R. Gibbs
John V. Hardeman, Jr.
Myron Keys
Carl P~den
Edward C. Vining, Jr.
Harold Yakely
Sidney Efronson
Mr. Yakely, seconded by Mr. Brau, moved that the minutes
of the regular meeting of February 12, 1963, be approved as
indiv~dually read.
Polled: Motion carried unanimously
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the appli-
cation of Ralph Clarke, owners of Lots 13, and 14, Block 2,
Larkin Pines, PB 24/20, for a change of zoning and variance, for
the purpose of constructing an apartment house. Change of zoning
from RU-l to RU-4; variance from 100' frontage to 95.06; 15,000
square feet to 14,259 square feet. Location -6001 SW 76 Street.
Mr. Ralph Clarke of 6001 SW 76 Street stated he was interested
in building an apartn:ent house, and asks for rezoning in order to
build. There is an apartment project next door to him, and he
would like to get his property rezoned for that purpose. He would
like to get larger dimensions if possible.
Mr. Roger Dick, general contractor spoke in favor of this
change of zoning, however, as Mr. Dick is not a resident of
South Miami, the Chairman advised the Board was interested in
hearing the residents of this city.
Mr. B. M. Kepshire of 6031 SW 76 Street wishes to object
to granting a change of zoning. This is spot zoning, and his
52' lot will be betw2en two apartment houses. It certainly will
not help the people in the neighborhood. Mr. Clarke does not have
enough room to build this apartment, ufuless he secures property
2/26/63
immediately west of his property_ If this rezoning takes place,
Mr. Kepshire's house is between Mr. Fosters and Fox's and Mrs.
Fox has already said she is in favor of apartment houses.
The Chairman, at this time was given a letter of objection
from a man in the audience, signed by Alfred Hagan, 7621 SW 61 Ave.
Wilton H. Gooch, 7643 SW 61 Avenue, William E. Stone, 7616 SW
61 Avenue, Joseph Mansfield, 7606 SW 61 Avenue and Bert Kepshire,
as follows:
Gentlemen:
We wish to protest the proposed re-zoning attempt on
SW 76 Street near SW 60 Avenue as an encroachment upon and into
the residential area surrounding. It is most evident that more
suitable property for the proposed venture lies elsewhere in
South Miami.
Mrs. Alice Rosenthal of 6020 SW 76 Street stated she is not
happy about having an apartment house across the street where she
lives, and objectsto change of zoning.
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Corsiglia, moved the Board recommend
to the City Council, denial as non-conforming use to the general
neighborhood; motion carried by poll:
****
Polled: Yes, 9
Abstained -Mr. Foster because of being
a neighbor
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the appli-
cation of Mrs. Agnes Ruhl, owner of the vi 137' of Tract 4, Larkin&
Forest, Amd., PB 33/44, for a change of zoning. Pr~sent zoning
RU-l; Proposed RU-5. Location -5730 SW 74 Terrace.
Mrs. Agnes Ruhl stated she purchased this property in July,
and since then a medical building was constructed on Red Road,
and she understands a variance has been asked on the property to
the left of her property, therefore, she felt now would be the
proper time to ask for a change of zoning.
Mr. Brau asked Mrs. Ruhl if she knew at the time that she
bought this property about the rezoning for the medical building,
and did she intend to put up an apartment building. Mrs. Ruhl
replied that she is now aware of the rezoning, and that she has
no plans at this time.
2 2/26/63
The Chairman read letters of objection to change of zoning,
from B. S. Chinn, Elmear C. Chinn of 5770 SI-I 7L', Terrace; Mr. and
Mrs. Luther Shafer of 5801 SltJ 7"1· Terrace; Mr. and Mrs. R. G. Garber,
Jr. of 5823 SW 74 Terrace.
Mrs. Betty Kowalchuk of 7510 SW 57 Court, new property owner
wishes to object and record her protest to a change of zoning.
She,>is just getting used to the idea of the parking lot across
the street. This change is tcouncertain, it can be professional
or apartment buildings, and she would not want an apartment right
on the corner from her. She can live with the well planned land-
scaped parking lot, but not an apartment house.
Mr. Herb Lesser of 7549 SW 58 Avenue who objects on the same
basis as Mrs. Kowalchuk, as he considers tl,is a residential area,
and hopes that it remains so.
Mr. Vining, seconded by Mr. Hardeman, moved that tile Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council, this request be
denied for change of zoning from RU-l to RU-5.
Polled: Motion carried unanimously
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the appli-
cation of George Marks, prospective owner of E~ of N~ of SE~ of SE~
of NE~ less W 25' of Section 36-54-40, for a change of zoning in
order to permit a shopping center. Present zoning -RU-l Proposed
C-l. Location -7810 Red Road.
Mr. Guion T. DeLoach of 311 SW 27 Avenue, attorney representing
Mr. Marks, showed the Board the plans for the proposed shopping
center. This center adjacent to expanding commercial area, that
this particular building will promote harmony with the entire area.
They are willing to provide buffer strips, landscaping, etc. to
minimize an impact of the shopping center. He feels the city
would benefit by revenue and increased real estate taxes. He does
solicit the Board's consideration on this. He did not have details
on number of stores etc.
The Chairman read letters of ObjeC~rom: Mr. Coburn of Dade
County Planning Department, R. F. Cook, Dade County Building and
Zoning Board, Roscoe H. Jones, Director Metro Planning Department,
Esther and Aaron Applebaum of 7900 SW 57 Court, Mr. and Mrs. Smith
of 5750 SW 80 Street, C. J. Simmons of 7830 SW 57 Court, Charles
V. Morin of 7901 SW 57 Court, Herbert S. Pablo, Jr. of 7820 SW 58
Avenue, Mr. and Mrs. William Shandor of 7800 SW 57 Court. Petition
with 27 names; Petition with 39 names.
3 2/26/63
The Chairman called for any objectors presen·c, from 60 to
70 hands were raised, the Chairman advised we would not be able
to hear all of them and asked that someone represent them.
Mr. George Shamos represented the majority of proper·ty owners
in the area. As chairman Mr. Shamos submitted a petition with
63 signatures objecting to change of zoning. He stated the people
who live in ·this area, invest their money in homes, they are entitled
to full protection from the Planning and Zoning Board on any appli-
cation to change zoning. This is nothing but spot zoning, the last
in the area is the Shore building and from there up to this property
is residential. There is no need for a shopping center here. This
proposed center will have an A & P store, there is adequate pro-
visions nearby, with Food Fair, Kwik Check, Stevens, Gardner's
store, Publix Market, 7-11 plus shopping centers. The homes on
the back end of 57 are in a range of $20,000 on up. The traffic
on Red Road cannot possibly sustain a shopping center. The shopping
area would have to handle 1000 cars a day to make any kind of profit.
The heavy equipment, air conditioners which would be in the rear,
all would be hazardous, offensive odors and noise, garbage trucks,
and the lighting would be like 'che Orange bowl. This would invade
the residential area. The health, safety and welfare of the people
is a basic thing that the City has to rely on. Mr. Shamas said
a prospective buyer was present, who would pay a fair market value,
that no harship has been shown, let the owner come before the
Board and show where she cant do anything wi·th this, especially
when you have someone standing by that will buy it.
Mr. Frank Howard of 5760 SW 81 Street stated Mr. DeLoach has
said this property was adjacent to expanding area, it is not, un-
less the Board permits it. He asked the Board to hold the residen-
tial character of the neighborhood. If the change of zoning is
permitted, his house will be Ior sale.
Mr. Alfred Cannel of 5710 SW 81 Street asked that the Board
and Council have a sort of philosophy of holding back the character
of the city. If the city had some sort of policy that the citizens
would not have to be coming to meetings to protect their rights,
on these variances, if there was a fixed policy. The strip zoning
and spot zoning is ruining the character of the city.
Mr. Brau advised Mr. Canael we do have a policy, we have a
zoning ordinance, and as a policy it is zoned RU-l, there can not
be an absolute adamant set policy, we are guided by the policies
that have passed, we must always be flexible, and the day we stop
being flexible, will be the day you will wish we were not here.
4 2/26/63
Mr. Hardeman, seconded by Colonel Gibbs, moved that the
Planning and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council, this
request be denied.
Polled: Motion carried unanimously
****
Tentative plat of Sunrise Estates, Second Addition, the
Chairman advised the minutes are filed incomplete and cannot
be acted upon until completed.
****
George Baker Thomson asked the Board what procedure would
be required for the South Miami Hospital would like to erect a
30 x 70, 7 stories high; not for patients, beds, just storage room
in the rear of the hospital where the parking now exists.
The Chairman advised him 'co see the Cicy Attorney, as he would
have to comply with the zoning ordinance. to get a definition of
what the code requires.
Mr. Thomson said he would discuss the matter with the Building
Department and then file application of request.
****
****
****
jlijartin Bro·ther' s application remains on the table. for infor-
mation.
Jardine application remains on the table.
There being no further business before the Board, meeting
adjourned at 9:35 P.M. upon motion duly made, seconded and
carried.
,-
Present:
Absent:
****
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
MARCH 12, 1963, AT CITY HALL AT 8 P.M.
Jack Stanton, Chairman
John Brau
Albert Corsiglia
Thomas Foster
C. R. Gibbs
John V. Hardeman, Jr.
Myron Keys
Carl Paden
Edward C. Vining, Jr.
Harold Yakely
Sidney Efronson
John Brau, seconded by Nyron Keys, moved that the minutes
of the regular meeting of February 26, 1963, be approved as
individually read.
Polled: Motion carried unanimously.
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the appli-
cation of Harry Seitlin, owner of Lots 22, 23 of Block 4, Franklin
Subdivision PB 5/34, for a change of zoning and a variance on
rear and side setbacks in order to construct a two story apartment
house. Change of zoning from C-l to RU-4B; Variance Rear 25' to
20' and Side 15' to 10', Location, approximately 6520 SW 59 Place.
Mr. William E. Martin, architect represented Mr. Seitlin~
stated the original request at the public hearing of April 24,
1962, was approved except changes for the parking required by
the City ordinance. The new plans submitted for the 2 story
12 unit apartment indicate 12 parking spaces.
After much discuRsion. Mr. Brau, seoonded by Mr. Corsiglia,
moved the Planning and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council,
approval of application for rezoning, and denial without prejudice
of variances as to rear and side setbacks.
Polled: Motion carried unanimously.
3/12/63
,
****
The tenative plat of Sunrise Estates, Second Addition,
submitted fur approval was considered, and Colonel Gibbs,
seconded by Mr. Foster, moved that the Board sees no objection
to the tenative plat as submitted.
Polled: Motion carried unanimously
****
Commander Paden, seconded by Colonel Yakely, moved that
the application of Thomas F. Jardine be removed from the table.
Motion carried unanimously.
The Chairman read a letter from George Baker Thomson, attorney
for Mr. Jardine, as follows:
"Mr. Jardine has authorized me to request a withdrawal of
pending application of Thomas F. Jardine: Lots 1,2,3,24,
25 & 26, Block 2, Westerfield Manor, Dade County, Florida.
Please consider this letter as a formal request for such
withdrawal. "
Commander Paden, seconded by Colonel Yakely, moved that the
Planning and Zoning Board accept the request of withdrawal, and
the request to be accepted without prejudice.
Polled: Motion carried unanimously
****
The Chairman read a letter received from Martin Brothers
as follows:
City of South Miami
South Miami, Florida
Attention: Planning and Zoning Board
Re: Variance for Lot 3, Field Villas
Dear Sirs:
We are in the process of completing working drawings
the building contemplated for Lot 2 Field Villas and
not as yet completed our traffic plan for the use of
for parking.
2
for
have
Lot 3
3/12/63
..
We will however state that our protective fences will be
equal to that used by the Shore Building, will join their
fence on the South and follow the gentle curve of South
Red Court to our North property line, then East to the
intersection of Lots 1 and 3.
We anticipate no problems or controversy with our final
plans and if this variance can be permitted subject to
the final approval by your Building Department we will
greatly appreciate it.
Very ·truly yours,
MARTIN BROS. INC.
/s/ Paul B. Martin, President
The tabled applica·tion of Martin Brothers remains on the
table pending submission of the plan for Lot 3 on parking, as
requested by the Board.
****
The Planning and Zoning Board requests specific and exact
information of the area to be studied on the referral of the
Clarke application as per Council minutes of March 5, 1963.
****
There being no further business before the Board, meeting
adjourned at 9:10 P.M., upon motion properly made, seconded and
carried.
Present:
Absent:
****
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
MARCH 26. 1963 AT CITY HALL AT 8 P.M.
Jack Stanton, Chairman
John Brau
Albert Corsiglia
Thomas Foster
John V. Hardeman. Jr.
Myron Keys
Carl Paden
Edward C. Vining. Jr.
Harold Yakely
Sidney Efronson
C. R. Gibbs
Colonel Yakely. seconded by Mr. Keys. moved that the minutes
of the regular meeting of March 12. 1963. be approved as indi-
vidually read. Motion carried unanimously.
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the
application of Gordon Albury. agent for J. A. King. owner of
Lot 11. Block 7. Merion Park Manor. Second Addition PB 63/95.
for a variance on side setback on swimming pool and screen en-
closure for a new residence. Required. Pool 15' proposed 12'1";
Required Screen Enclosure 12', proposed 9'3"; Location approx-
imately 6841 SW 66 Avenue.
Mr. Albury stated if his request is allowed it will lend
itself to a better design and elininate an awkward architectural
condition. There will be a 6'0 high wood louver fence at the
property line that will serve to shield all activities within
the pool patio area.
No letters of objection were received and no objectors
present at the meeting.
Colonel Yakely. seconded by Mr. Vining, moved that the
Planning and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that
the requests for variances as indicated in the application be
granted. Motion carried by the following poll.
Polled: Yes, 7
No. 2
I Abstained
3/26/63
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the
application of A. S. Forrest, owner of Lots 34, 35 of Block 23,
Cambridge Lawns, PB 20/48, for a variance on lot size and lot
frontage to permit the construction of a single family residence.
Required, 75'; Proposed 50' frontage; Required Lot size 10,000
square feet; Proposed 5408.5 square feet.
Mr. Forrest stated that prior to the purchase of the lots,
he inquired from the Building Department and was informed that
he could build with a 50' frontage. Based on this information
he made application to the Federal Savings & Loan Association,
and now has an existing mortgage. Mr. Forrest owns 5' of the
road which he will dedicate to the City, and also the ease-
ment in the rear will be dedicated to the City.
The Chairman read letters from Norma Greenberg and Mr.
Sol Rovin stating "No objection" to this request.
Mr. Willard "Burton spoke in favor of granting this request
for variance.
The"Chairman read letters of objection from Mr. Harry
Carter of 6270 SW 62 Court and Mr. & Mrs. John Young of 6401
SW 63 Avenue.
Mr. B. F. Rudnick of 6381 SW 63 Avenue, Mr. R. Bender of
6291 SW 62 Place, and Mr. Albert Green, appeared before the
Board to voice their objections of granting this variance.
Mr. Bert Wilmers of 6251 SW 63 Court said he represented
39 property owners, who objected to granting this variance, how-
ever no petitions were filed with the Planning and Zoning Board.
Mr. Fred August of 6221 SW 62 Terrace said he represented
7 property owners who objected to granting this variance; no
petition filed with the Planning and Zoning Board.
After much discussion, Mr. Foster, seconded by Mr. Vining,
moved that the Planning and Zoning Board recommend to the City
Council that the application of Mr. Forrest for variances be
denied. Motion carried by the following poll.
Polled: Yes, 6
No, 3
1 Abstained
2 3/26/63
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the
application of Lillian Jones, owner of Lots 11, 12, 13, 18,
and 19 of Block 3, Amended Plat of Seaview Park, PB 17/80, for
proposed cutout of tract 100' X 100' for the purpose of con-
structing a single family residence and variances to allow same.
Required, 25' setback; proposed 14' setback; Required land area,
12,500 square feet; proposed 10,000 square feet. Loaation 5885 SW
84 Street and approx. 5880 SW 83 Street.
Lillian Jones called the Building Department March 20,
1963, to amend her request, stating she plans to sell the
three lots on 83 Street. This will make the lot 12,000 square
feet, the required is 12,500 square feet, the variance will then
be for 500 square feet.
The Chairman read a letter of objection from Robert Thorner
of 5861 SW 84 Street.
Mrs. Jones appeared before the Board stated she would like
to seilil these three lots and would appreciate the Board's
consideration. She had offered to sell Lot 11 to Mr. Thorner,
and does not know the reason for their objection.
The following objectors were heard: Mr. Nicholas A. Kotys
of 5827 SW 84 Street; Mrs. Thorner of 5861 SW 84 Street; Mr.
Charles Riden of 5851 SW 84 Street; the consensus of objection
being, this would establish a precedence.
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Efronson, moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council approval of the
request and the request as amended on the application of Lillian
Jones.
Polled: Motion carried unanimously.
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the appli-
cation of Dr. James A. Vaughn, Jr., owner of Lot 21 and the N 15'
of Lot 22 less the E 25' for roadway, William A. Hobbs, Sub-
division, PB 4/111, for a change of zoning to permit offices for
medical doctors. Present zoning RU-l; Requested C-l, Location
7240 SW 62 Avenue.
Mr. George B. Thomson, representing Dr. Vaughn, stated this
structure will improve the appearance of the neighborhood. The
remodeling cost will be approximately $10,000. Nineteen property
owners were notified and no objections were received.
j 3/26/63
Mr. Matson O'Neal, Jr. of 5930 SW 73 Street, spoke in
favor of this project.
Mr. Efronson, seconded by Mr. Brau, made a motion that
the Planning and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council,
that the Vaughn application be granted a Use Variance Permit,
in accordance with the sketch submitted with the application.
Polled: Motion carried unanimously.
****
The Cha~.rman read the notice of public hearing on the
application of Ted Arch, owner of Trail Automotive Parts, Inc.,
for a variance to permit a machine shop at 6718 SW 62 Avenue,
N 75' of S 193' of Block 5, Cocoplum Terrace Addition, PB 43/38.
Present zoning C-l; Required for machine shop C-2.
Mr. Arch stated they have been located in this builcing for
the past ten years, and have operated a machine shop for that
length of time. They did not know they were in violation of
any law. The machine shop is imperative to the business, and if
request is denied it would be a financial hardship to all con-
cerned.
Mr. Ted Marks, landlord, of 7840 SW 53 Avenue, spoke in
favor of this request; that the operation is clean and orderly.
No letters of objection were received, however, Mr. Paul
Davis; Mr. Arch Smith of 6731 SW 62 Court; Mr. V. Porter of
6721 SW 62 Court, appeared
granting of this request.
noise created by the Steam
before the Board in objection to
The consensus of objection was the
Jenny.
Mr. John Hillyer of 6631 SW 62 Court objects to any further
variance being granted in this area.
Mr. Foster, seconded by Mr. Hardeman, Jr., made a motion
that the Planning and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council,
in the case of Trail Automotive, that a variance be granted to
Trail Automotive to operate an Automotive Machine Shop, provided
all operations be confined to the interior of its building, and
further that the Steam .Jenny shall not be allowed in this opera-
tion. Motion carried by the following poll.
Polled: Yes, 9
No, 1
4
3/26/63
**** Martin Brothers' application remains on the table.
****
The Planning and Zoning Board recognizes that the area
study requested by the City Council has been clarified for
the boundaries. This matter will be taken under advisement,
and study will be made at the next meeting. This study area
refers to the application of Ralph Clarke, 6001 SW 76 Street.
****
The Chairman requests that the public '~earings be limited
to three applications for a meeting, however, in case of an
emergency, the Chairman to be contacted, and he will order the
acceptance of same.
****
The Chairman requests additional copies of the face-sheet of
Agenda for the meetings of the Planning and Zoning Board.
****
There being no further business before the Board, meeting
adjourned at 10:40 P. M., upon motion of Mr. Brau, seconded by
Mr. Corsiglia, and carried.
5
3/26/63
Present:
Absent:
****
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
APRIL 9, 1963, AT CITY HALL AT 8 P.M.
John Brau, Chairman
Albert Corsiglia
Thomas T. Foster
C. R. Gibbs
John V. Hardeman, Jr.
Myron Keys
Carl Paden
Edward C. Vining, Jr.
Harold Yakely
Jack Stanton
Sidney Efronson
Captain Paden, seconded by Colonel Yakely, moved that the
minutes of the regular meeting of March 26, 1963, be approved
as individually read. Motion carried unanimously.
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the appli-
cation of Maurice Rosen, attorney and agent for Miriam Rosen,
owner and I. L. Reisman, lessee, of Lots 1 thru 5, Block 1, Reilly,
Stoms and Paxson Subdivision, PB 27/56, for a change of zoning or
use variance to permit a billiard parlor. Location 5948-50-54-56
Sunset Drive.
Mr. Joseph Reisman, represented Mrs. Rosen and Mr. Reisman,
stated this building would made a substantial improvement and also
beneficial to the area.
No letters of objection were received, and no objectors present.
Mr. Keys, seconded by Colonel Yakely, moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that application of
Maurice Rosen, attorney and agent for Miriam Rosen and I. L. Reisman
be denied.
****
Polled: Yes, 8
No, 1
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the appli-
cation of W. F. Esslinger, administrator of estate of Ordonez et al,
4--9-63
and Carl Droke, agent, for a variance on lot frontage and lot size
to permit the construction of a single family residence. Location,
7114 Sit) 63 Avenue.
The Chairman read a petition with 16 signatures in objection
to this variance, on the grounds that this variance would depreciate
the appearance of the neighborhood, and decrease property values.
Mr. Droke, agent said the home adjoining on the South is 50'
property, and on the North 60' lot, that if this variance is granted
the building will meet the required setback.
The following objectors were heard: Mr. George Hays of 7115
SW 63 Court, his home is on a 50' lot, however, he feels that if
building is continued on 50' lots that the area will tend to go
down. Mr. Bowman of 7121 SW 63 Court Objects as this may be used
as rental property.
Captain Paden, seconded by Mr. Vining, moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the application
of W. F. Esslinger, administrator of estate of Ordonez et al be
approved.
Polled: Motion carried unanimously
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the appli-
cation of Norman L. Greenberg and Sol Rovin, owners of Lots 12,
13, 8, of Block 6, and Lot 6 in Block 8, Twin Lakes Manor Sub-
division, PB 57/82, for variances on lot frontage and lot size to
allow the construction of 4 single family residences. Required
Lot Frontage 75'; Proposed, Lot 8 Block 6 -60.65'; Lot 12, Blk 6 -
62.9'; Lot 13 Blk 6 -63.9'; Lot 6 Blk 8 -64.79'. Lot 6 Block 8
also requires a variance on lot size, Required 10,000 sq ft; Pro-
posed 6,930 sq ft.
The Chairman stated petitions with 26 signatures, 37 signa-
tures and 3 signatures, also notification from Mr. & Mrs. John H.
Young were received objecting to granting of any kind of variances.
Mr. Haskoe s·tated Mr. Greenberg checked with the Building
Department and tIle City Manager and was told because this was a
recorded plat, tllere would be no question about building, there-
fore they proceeded with the plans, then the City Attorney decided
they would have to get variances.
Mr. Pegram, Mr. Shapiro of 6271 SW 63 Avenue voiced their
objections to variances being gra:ited: Mr •. Ed HO;J.ly of 6300 SW
2 4-9-63
6~ Place objected to the filth and vermin on the lot, and
asked that the City keep it clean or permit these people to build.
Mr. Keys, seconded by Mr. Corsiglia, moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the applica-
tion of Mr. Greenberg and Sol Rovin be approved.
Polled: Motion carried unanimously
****
Mr. Dawson appeared before the Board and asked to have his
application for outside doors withdrawn.
The Board unanimously approved the withdrawal.
****
The Chairman read the letter from Harry Seitlin stating his
application was being held up due to the fact that SW 59 Place
is 22'6" wide and according to ordinance must be 50' at this
location. That no permit may be issued until the Board and Council
approve the width of the street. Mr. Seitlin is willing to dedicate
14'3" in order to attain the required width, however, his property
building will have to be moved to the rear of his property that
distance. He will then not have -the required 25' rear setback.
Mr. Foster, seconded by Colonel Gibbs, moved that a "No cost"
public hearing be held, in view of the fact the owner has mentioned
the matter of the dedication.
Polled: Motion carried unanimously.
****
Mr. Foster, seconded by Mr. Vining, moved that the Martin
application be removed from the table. Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Foster, seconded by Mr. Corsiglia, moved that the plan
as submitted, dated, and initialed by the Board be approved as
the requirement for Off Street Parking, on the original request
that referred to RU-5 On Lot 2; that the variance on Lot 3, con-
form to the plan as submitted, dated and approved.
Colonel Gibbs, seconded by Captain Paden, made a motion to
amend the original motion, that it be approved as stated, provided
that a masonry wall or decorative masonry fence of 5' in height be
installed for the protection of adjacent property.
Polled on the amendment: Yes, 8
No, 1
3 4/9/63
****
Polled on the ·original motion: Yes, 8
No, 1
Unfinished business.
The Chairman requested the "study area" requested by the
City Council, in reference to tabled Resolution No. 1778 of
March 5, 1962, be placed on the agenda for the next regular
meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board.
The Chairman appointed the following committee for this
study area:
Myron Keys, Edward Vining, Jr., John Hardeman, Jr.,
Colonel C. R. Gibbs, and John Brau.
There being no further business before the Board, the meeting
adjourned at 10:40 p.m., upon motion duly made, seconded, and
unanimously carried.
Present:
muTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE SOUTH M.l'!MI PLANNING AND ZONING
BOARD, APRIL 30, 1963, AT CITY HALL
A:r 8:00 P.M.
Jack Stanton, Chairman
John Brau, Vice Chairman
Albert Corsiglia
Sidney Efronson
Thomas Foster
C. R. Gibbs
John Hardeman, Jr.
Myron Keys
Carl Paden
Edward C. Vining, Jr.
Harold Yakely
Absent: None
Ex Officio: R. C. Gammage
By motion properly ~ade and seconded, the minutes of the regular meeting
of April 9, 1963 were approved as individually read.
***
Chairman Stanton read the Notice of Public Hearing on the application
of Harry Seitlin, owner of Lots 22,23, Block 4, Franklin Subdivision,
PB 5/34, for a variance on rear setback to allow the construction of a
two-story apartment house. Location: 6520 SW 59 Place.
Mr. Martin appeared for the applicant. There were no objectors.
BOARD'S ACTION ON PUBLIC HEARING
Re: Harry Seitlin
Mr. Keys, seconded by Mr. Vining, moved that the Planning and Zoning
Board recommend to the City Council that the application of Harry Seitlin,
m~er of Lots 22,23, Block 4, Franklin SubdiviSion, PB 5/34, for a
variance to allow the construction of a two-story apartment house, be
GRANTED.
***
Polled -Yes 11
No 0
Chairman Stanton then read the Notice of Public Hearing on the application
of the Shell Oil Company for a variance on the height of a pole sign.
Location: 6480 South Dixie Hy.
Mr. Gates of the Shell Oil Company appeared for the applicant.
There were no objectors.
BOARD'S ACTION ON PUBLIC HEARING
Re: Shell Oil Company
Mr. Corsiglia, seconded by Mr. Brau, moved that the Planning and
Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the application
of the Shell Oil Company for a sign variance at 6480 South Dixie
Hight,ay be DENIED.
'1."**
Polled -Yes 11
No 0
"lc*1: ***
Chairman Stanton then read the Notice of Public Hearing on the
application of C. 1:1. Fisher for a variance to permit open letters on
an electric sign. Location: 5800 Sunset Drive
Hr. Fisher spoke in his own behalf. There "ere no objectors.
BOARD'S ACTION ON PUBLIC HEARING
Re: C. W. Fisher
Mr. Vining, seconded by Mr. Hardeman, moved that the Planning and
Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the application of
C. VI. Fisher for a sign variance at 5800 Sunset Drive be DENIED.
Polled -Yes 9
No 2
*** m'd: 'irlrl<
Chairman Stanton then read the Notice of Public Hearing on the appli-
cation of A. S. Forrest, agent for Remark Bell, owner of Lot 86, Block 16,
Franklin Subdivision, PB 5/34, for a variance on lot size and frontage
to allo," the construction of a duplex. Location: 6051-53 Sl:J 63 Street
Hr. Forrest spoke in behalf of Hr. Bell. There were no objectors.
BOARD'S ACTION ON PUBLIC HEARING
Re: Remark Bell
i1r. Brau, seconded by lir. Vining, moved that this application be
TABLED pending further study of the plot plan and setbacks.
Polled -Yes 10
No 1
*irl, **,~ ***
lir. Stanton then read the Notice of Public Hearing on the application
of the South Niami Hospital Foundation for variances of required
parking and to allo," the construction of a seven-story addition to
the present st~ucture. Location: 7400 SW 62 Avenue.
11r. George B. Thomson, attorney, appeared for the applicant.
There were no objectors.
BOARD'S ACTION ON PUBLIC HEARING
Re: South Miami Hospital Foundation
Mr. Vining, seconded by Mr. Efronson, moved that the Planning and
-2-
Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the application of
the South Miami Hospital Foundation for variances of required parking
and to allo", the addition of a seven-story addition to the present
structure be GRA~ITED.
***
Polled -Yes 9
No 2
-Irlrlc
The committee appointed to study the American TOVlnsites area -
Mr. Keys, Chairman -submitted the following report:
***
"It is recommended by the Committee that the Planning and Zoning Board
recommend to the City Council that they enact an ordinance in reference
to Section 20-22, paragraph (1) and Section 20-22.1, setting forth
that every use permitted in the preceding RU zoning be permitted in
C-l zoning."
Mr. Keys, seconded by Hr. Vining, moved that the report of the com-
mittee be adopted by the Board.
'1'**
Polled -Yes 10
Abstained 1
*** ***
Mr. Foster, seconded by Mr. Brau, moved that the Planning and Zoning
Board request the City Council to direct the City Manager to investigate
the enforcement of the sign ordinance, particularly in cases of non-
conforming signs , ",here no building permit has been issued; also the
possibility of using police patrol cars to check the proper display
of building permits at the sites during sign construction.
Polled -Yes 11
No 0
*"'(* **-;'c ***
Chairman Stanton announced that there will be a special meeting of the
Planning and Zoning Board at 8:00 P.N. on Hednesday, May 29, 1963, to
dispose of the backlog of hearings.
*'''* *** ;,**
There being no further business, by motion properly seconded, the
meeting adjourned at 10:20 P.M.
By: Carl Paden, Acting
Recording Secretary
Present:
****
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
MAY 14, 1963, AT CITY HALL AT 8 P.M.
Jack Stanton, Chairman
John Brau
Albert Corsiglia
Sidney Efronson
Thomas Foster
C. R. Gibbs
John V. Hardeman, Jr.
Myron Keys
Carl Paden
Edward C. Vining, Jr.
Harold Yakely
Mr. CorSiglia, seconded by Mr. Brau, moved that the minutes
of the regular meeting of April 30, 1963, be approved as individ-
ually read. Motion carried unanimously. The Chairman thanked
Mr. Paden for the minutes of April 30, 1963.
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the appli-
cation of Lee Roy Perry, owner of Lots 19, 20 Block 2, Pines Sub-
division PB 13/2, for a variance on a non-conforming lot for the
purpose of constructing a duplex. Required 60' frontage, 50'
proposed, Variance 10'; 6000 sq ft land, proposed 4.500 sq ft.
variance 1500 sq ft. Location: approx. 6150 SW 63 Street.
The Chairman read letter of objection from J. F. Diehl of
Square Deal Corporation.
Present at the meeting was Lee Roy Perry on behalf of his
application for variance, as housing is needed in this area. Mr.
A. S. Forrest. agent for Mr. Perry submitted prints of the floor
plans to the Board.
Mr. Vining, seconded by Hr. Paden, moved t"at the Planning
and Zoning Board recom.'11end to the City Council, tllat the petition
as applied for be granted.
Polled: Yes, 10
No, 1 John Brau, because of question of
the zoned right of way
5/14/63
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the appli-
cation of Lloyd Collier, agent for John L. Fryar, owner of W 50'
of S 80' of N 186' of E~ of NW~ of mv~ of SE~ Section 25-54-40,
for variances necessary to the construction of a single family
residence. Required 5000 sq ft land, proposed 4000 sq ft, var-
iance 1000 sq ft; required 7~' side setback, proposed 5', var-
iance 2~'; 25' rear setback, proposed 19', variance 6'. Loca-
tion: approx. 6081 SW 64 Terrace.
The Chairman read letter of objection from J. F. Diehl of
Square Diehl Corporation, on the grounds of too large a variance.
Present at the m8eting was Lloyd Collier, agent for Mr. Fryar,
on behalf of the application, stating reasons for the request. After
full discussion, the following motion was made.
Mr. Brau, seconded by r~. Vining, moved that the Board recom-
mend to the City Council that the variance as to lot size only for
construction of single fanily residence not to exceed 1000 sq ft
be granted.
Polled: Hotion carried unanimously
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the appli-
cation of Lloyd Collier, agent for Georgianna L. Donavan, owner
of the E 50' of W 100' of N 105.5' less N 25' for road of E~ of
NW~ of NW~ of SE~ of Section 25-54-40, for variances necessary to
construction of a duplex. Required 60' frontage, proposed 50',
variance 10'; 6000 sq ft land, proposed 4,030, variance 1970 sq ft;
25' front setback, p~opoped 22', variance 3'; 25' rear setback,
proposed lO~, variance l4~'. Location approx. 6080 SW 64 Street.
The Chairman re2d letter of objection from J. F. Diehl on the
grounds variance is too large, making subdivision sub-standard.
Present at the meeting was Lloyd Collier, agent for Georgianna
L. Donavan, on behalf of ap~lication for variances, stating the
present building has bGen condemned by the Building Department, and
applicant wishes to build and improve the neighborhood.
Mr. Will C. Bcncono of 115 Ocean Drive, has property immediately
adjacent to the East, and SPOk8 in favor of this application.
Present at the meeting was Rev. J. E. Hurray of Ht. Nebo Baptist
Church with 27 members in opposition to variances being granted, as
thereby creating a nuisunce.
2 5/14/63
•
After a short discussion, Mr. Paden, seconded by Mr. Hardeman,
moved that in view of the minor variance, the Board recommend to
the City Council that application of Georgianna L. Donavan be
granted.
****
Polled: Yes, 8
No, 2
1 Abstained
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on -the appli-
cation of Llyod Collier, agent for Mamie V. Brown, owner of Lots
35, 36 of Block C, Townsite of Larkins, PB 4/1, for variances
necessary to the construction of a single family residence. Re-
quired 5000 sq ft land, proposed 3,263, variance 1737 sq ft; 25'
front setback, proposed 17'11", variance 7'1"; 25' rear setback,
proposed 5', variance 20'; 15' side setback (corner),proposed
10'8", variance 4'4"; 7>" side setback (inside), proposed 5', var-
iance 2>,,'. Location: approx. 6101 SW 67 Street.
Mr. Collier spoke in behalf of the applicant, stating thw is
a hardship case, as Mrs. Brown had complied with the Building
Department and had the condemned building removed and now wishes
to rebuild.
After much discussion, Mr. Foster, seconded by Mr. Efronson,
moved to table application, pending further study.
****
Polled: Yes, 8
No, 3
The Chairman read tLle notice of public hearing on the appli-
cation of Carl L. Lindgren, Jr., owner of the N 115' of E 165' of
Tract 1, Larkins Forrest, £3 18/33, for a variance on rear set-
back to allow a shopping center. Required setback 15', proposed
None. Location 7400 Red Road.
The Chairman read letters of objection from Elmear Chinn of
7400 SW 57 Court; Alleyne Nason of 5720 SW 74 Street, and Nellie
Schulz of 7330 SW 57 Avenue.
Present at the meeting was Carl J. Lindgren, Jr., on behalf
of his application, stating it was a misinterpretation of the
Building Department after the plans were completed; if Mr. Lindgren
has to take a setback it will eleminate one store. Mr. Robert
Hutchins spoke in favor of granting this variance, also Mr. A.
Rifkin, owner of the Crossroad Building spoke in favor of applicant.
3 5/14/63
•
Present at the meeting was David Popper, attorney, represent-
ing Mr. Alleyne Nason whose property is adjacent west of this
property. voiced his objections as depriving the people in the area,
the use of their homes. There should be ingress and egress for
proper deliveries to stores without invading the use of private
homes. The plans could be redone to comply wi til requirements of
the City.
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Efronson, moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council, the application of
Carl Lindgren be DENIED.
****
Polled: Yes, 9
No, 1
1 Abstained
Present at the meeting was Remark Bell, A. S. Forrest and
others for consider~tion of tabled application (not on agenda)
of Remark Bell for variance on lot size and frontage to allow a
duplex.
Mr. Foster, seconded by Mr. Brau,
Remark Bell be removed from the table.
moved -that application of
Motio~ carried unanimously.
After full discussion, Mr. Vining, seconded by Mr. Brau,
moved to table application of Remark Bell pending further study.
****
Polled: Yes, 10
No, 1
Consideration was then given to tenative Plat of Sunrise
Estates Second Addition, owner A. D. Lewis.
Chairman Stanton, seconded by Mr. Efronson, moved that the
tenative plat of Sunrise Estates,Second Addition be approved as
shown on the drawing. Motion carried unanimously.
****
Mr. Yakely, seconded by Mr. Vining,
adjourned. Motion carried unanimously.
P.M.
moved that the meeting be
Meeting adjourned at 11:00
4 5/14/63
PtrnSENT:
Absent:
****
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
MAY 28, 1963 AT CITY HALL AT 8:00 P.M.
Jack Stanton, Chairman
John Brau
Sidney Efronson
Thomas T. Foster
C. R. Gibbs
John V. Hardeman, Jr.
Myron Keys
Edward C. Vining, Jr.
Harold Yakely
Albert Corsiglia
Carl Paden
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Efronson, moved that the minutes
of the regular meeting of May 14, 1963, be approved as individually
read. Motion carried unanimously.
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the appli-
cation of George B. Thomson, agent for Walter E. Boyd, DVM, ten-
ative owner of E 100' of W 275' of W~ of NE~ of NW~ of NW~ of
Section 24-54-40, to allow an animal clinic. Present zoning C-l;
Animal clinics require a C-3 zoning. Location -6420 Bird Road.
The Chairman read a letter of objection from D. C. Fitzpatrick
of 4117 SW 65 Avenue.
Mr. Thomson was present and submitted a survey sketch of the
property involved to each member of the Board. He showed photo-
graphs depicting the character of the neighborhood. and submitted
a rendering of the proposed property. He stated the granting of
this application would provide a needed service to the northside
residents of our City.
Mr. Vining, seconded by Mr. Gibbs, moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that a special use
permit be granted in accordance with the plans and rendering on
record, s"igned by the Chairman, I'll". BraU and Mr. Keys.
Polled: Motion carried unanimously
5/28/63
****
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Efronson, made a motion to remove
the application of Mamie Brown from the table. Motion carried
unanimously.
The Chairman had made a study of this property and talked with
the owner and contractor. The Chairman had 3 sketches of the prop-
erty which was passed among the Board members. Variances would have
to be granted in order to build on this property.
Mr. Keys, seconded by Mr. Brau, moved that the Planning and
Zoning Board recommend to the City Council approval for a building
permit, based on sketches which are identified by signature and date
of the Chairman, Jack Stanton. The sketches to be made a matter of
record.
Polled: Motion carried unanimously.
****
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Yakely, moved that the application
of Remark Bell be removed from the table. Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Keys, moved that the Planning and
Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that application be
approved on the plot plan and floor plan identified by signature of
the Chairman, Jack Stanton.
Polled: Motion carried unanimously.
****
Mr. Foster, seconded by Mr. Hardeman, moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the Zoning
Ordinance be amended to require that the lot frontage requirement
be measured at the zoned building line, rather than at front property
line. This would insure fair spacing of houses in area where the
side property lines are not parallel.
Polled: Motion carried unanimously
****
Mr" Foster, seconded by Mr. Brau, moved that the Planning and
Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that an Ordinance be
drawn and passed, requiring sidewalks, curbs and gutters on all
properties that are developed as RU-4 sites. This would apply to
apartment houses that are constructed after adoption of the ordinance
by variance or special use permits or on property zoned RU-4.
2 5/28/63
Mr. Keys, seconded by Mr. Brau, moved to amend the motion
to include RU-3 and RU-4B.
Polled on the "2;":,,nd::tent: Motiof.l carriod unanimously.
Polled on the motion as amended: Yes, 8; No, 1
There being no further business before the Board, Mr. Vining,
seconded by Mr. Brau, moved to adjourn at 9:05 p.m.; motion carried
unanimously.
3 5/28/63
·
Present:
Absent:
****
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
JUNE II, 1963 AT CITY HALL AT 8:00 P.M.
Jack Stanton, Chairman
John Brau, Vice Chairman
Sidney Efronson
Thomas T. Foster
Myron Keys
Carl Paden
Edward C. Vining, Jr.
Harold Yakely
Albert Corsiglia
C. R. Gibbs
John V. Hardeman, Jr.
Mr. Paden, seconded by Mr. Efronson, moved that the minutes
of the regular meeting of May 28, 1963, be approved as individually
read. Motion carried unanimously.
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the appli-
cation of Nathan Jones, owner of Lots 31, 32 of Block A Resubdiv-
ision of Blocks 3 and 4, Townsite of Larkins, PB 4/1, for variances
to allow the construction of a single family residence. Required
25' front setback, proposed 15.71', variance 9.91'; Required 25'
rear setback, proposed 15', variance 10'; Required 7~' side set-
back, proposed 5', variance 2~'. Location -approx. 5965 SW 66
Terrace.
The Vice Chairman read a letter from Mr. Jones stating the
financing is now available to build his home, and should his re-
quest be denied, it would place an extreme hardship upon his family.
Mr. Keys, seconded by Mr.
Zoning Board recommend to the
of Nathan Jones be approved.
Brau, moved that the Planning and
City Council that the application
Polled: Yes,S; No, 3 (No vote).
Mr. Paden made a motion that this application be postponed
until the next regular meeting. Motion failed for lack of a second.
Mr. Vining, seconded by Mr. Efronson, moved to reconsider the
application. Motion carried.
6/11/63
Mr. Vining, seconded by Mr. Yakely, moved. that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council the application
be approved for a one story building.
Polled: Yes, 6; No, 2
Mr. Foster requested his "No" vote for the reason that the
plan as submitted with variances as requested is asking for some-
thing for which a building permit cannot be issued, be reflected
in the minutes.
****
The Vice Chairman read ti1e notice of public hearing on the
application of Dellis N. Pamplin, Trustee for Lots 33, 34,35,36
of Block A Townsite of Larkins, PB 4/1, for variances to allow
the construction of an apartment house. Required 8,000 sq ft
land, proposed 6,175, variance 1,825 sq ft; Required 25' front
setback, proposed 19'10", variance 5'2"; Required 25' rear set-
back, proposed 15', variance 10'. Location 6636 SW 59 Place.
Mr. David Phillips and Dellis N. Pamplin were present and
Mr. Phillips spoke in behalf of their request. The present apart-
ment building was condemned and the owners were advised the exist-
ing building should be torn down rather than repaired. They will
build a nice 6 unit apartment house and donate 5' on the side and
5' on the front to the City, if their request is granted.
Mr. Vining, seconded by Mr. Efronson, moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council, the variances be
approved, based on plans submitted and identified by signature and
date of the Chairman. The plan to be made a matter of record.
Polled: Yes, 6; No, 2; Mr. Paden's "No"
vote to reflect he is opposed to any further increase in the
density.
****
The Vice Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the
application of Ernest C. Edinger, owner of Lot 7 Block 1 of
Sunset Villas, PB 15/42, for variances to permit tcle construction
of a duplex. Required 100' frontage, proposed 50', variance 50';
Required 10,000 sq ft land, proposed 6,987, variance 3,013 sq ft.
Location 7231 SW 63 Court.
The Chairman read letters of approval from R. T. Spengler of
7243 SW 63 Court and Irene L. Briner of 7223 sw 63 Court.
2 6/11/63
Mr. Edinger of 8455 SW 45 Street was present and spoke in
behalf of his application, and presented a plan to the Board to
be made part of the record. There are duplexes on each side of
the property he owns. He formerly lived in South Miami and plans
to move back to the City.
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Yakely, moved that the Planning and
Zoning Board recommend to the City Council the approval of the
application as requested.
Polled: Motion carried unanimously.
****
The Vice Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the
application of Louis I. Brooks, owner of Lot 8 Block 12 of
Cocoplum Terrace, Addition Part 4, PB 58/62, for variance to ex-
tend awning carport 10' in front of the front building line.
Location -6400 Svl 64 Avenue.
The Chairman received a petition signed by 12 neighbors in
favor of the variance. Approximately 10 people were present and
voiced approval of the variance being granted. No objectors were
present.
Mr. Paden, seconded by Mr. Vining, moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council, a Special Use
Permit be granted for the existing canvas covered car shelter.
Polled: Yes, 7; No, 1 -Mr. Keys, because no
permit was obtained and it is in violation.
****
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Keys, moved that in clarification
of the matter of American Townsites and that area bounded by
59 Avenue on the East, 62 Avenue on the West, 76 Street on the
South and US #1 Highway on Northwest; it be so noted that the
Board out of committee, recommends to the City Council that the
zoning remain as is.
Polled: Yes, 6; No, 1; Abstained, 1.
There being no further business before the Board, Mr. Efronson,
seconded by Mr. Vining, moved to adjourn. Motion carried. Meeting
adjourned at 9:25 P.M.
3 6/11/63
Present:
Absent:
****
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
JUNE 25, 1963, CITY HALL AT 8:00 P.M.
Jack Stanton, Chairman
John Brau, Vice Chairman
Sidney Efronson
Thomas T. Foster
Myron Keys
Carl Paden
J. C. Shaw
Edward C. Vining, Jr.
Harold Yakely
Albert Corsiglia
C. R. Gibbs
Mr. Paden, seconded by Mr. Keys, moved that the minutes of
the regular meeting of June 11, 1963, be approved as individually
read. Motion carried unanimously.
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the appli-
cation of Matson G. O'Neal, Jr., owner of Lots 8, 9, 10, 11 of
Poinciana Park, PB 41/41, for a change of zoning for the purpose
fo constructing an office building. Present Zoning RU-l; proposed
C-l. Location -approximately 7301 SW 62 Avenue
Present at the mee~~ng at this time was Mr. O'Neal, owner of
property at 7301 SW 62 Avenue, in the interest of his application,
and stated he spoke to the neighbors in the area, and no one had
any objections to construction of an office building.
Mr. Reynolds, owner of Lot 19, adjacent to the proposed con-
struction, wished to go on record he was not opposed to an office
building, but wished to be enlightened regarding the C-l zoning,
and also asked to see the submitted plans.
Mr. Efronson, seconded by Mr. Paden, moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that a Special Use
permit be granted for the construction of a 2 story office building,
based on the Sketches submitted, which are identified by signature
and date of .the Chairman, Jacl< Stanton.
Polled: Yes, 8
No, 1
6/25/63
--
****
Mr. Corsiglia had requested a 30-day leave of absence, due
to illness.
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Yakley, moved that leave of absence
be granted, retroactive to June 11, 1963. Motion carried unanimously.
****
The appointment of a nominating committee for the annual
election of Chairman and Vice Chairman to be put on the agenda
for the next regular meeting.
****
With reference to the sign ordinance, Mr. Keys advised the
Board that the Shell Oil Company sign has been changed, but he
Texas Ranger sign has not been changed to date.
The above information to be recorded in the minutes.
****
There being no further business before the Board, meeting
adjourned at 9:05 p.m., upon motion duly made, properly seconded,
and carried.
6/25/63
""""")-,~---"-"
.r,
-~
~------
From:
To:
SUBJECT:
\ -)' '-~---'"":~-">-, ... --. ......,~'~,~:.;--'-:',~''7'.' ----.,..,--,----.--2:5~
l'fJEMORANDUM
City Council of City of South Miami
Planning and Zoning Board
June 25, 1963
mc
Replies thereto -recommendations of Planning
and Zoning Board submitted to Council on April 30,
May 28, and June 11, 1963
#1 Re: American Townsites
City Attorney Hardie will draw an ordinance to
clarify this matter and will forward same to the
Planning and Zoning Board. It is now in the mill.
#2 Re: Sign Ordinance
This is strictly an administrative matter, and will
be handled by the City Manager.
#3 Re: Lot frontage requirements
This should come before the Board to be handled
on an individual basis for variance.
#4 Re: Sidewalks, curbs and gutters
This should be by regular improvement districts,
so as to develope whole areas for uniformity.
Present:
Absent:
****
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
JULy 30, 1963, CITY HALL, AT 8:00 p.m.
Jack Stanton, Chairman
John Brau
Thomas T. Foster
C. R. Gibbs
Myron Keys
Carl Paden
J. C. Shaw
Edward C. Vining, Jr.
Harold Yakely
Albert Corsiglia, with permission
Sidney Efronson
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Vining, moved that the minutes of
the regular meeting of June 25, 1963, be approved as individually
read. Motion carried unanimously.
****
The Chairman read the nO"Cl.ce of public hearing on the appli-
cation of Catherine Loomis, owner of Lot 29, Grandview Park, PB
49/82, for a variance to permit installation of outside door to
den and bathroom which is being constructed by enclosing existing
carport. Lvcation, 5357 SW 67 Avenue.
Present at the meeting at this time was Catherine Loomis, owner,
who explained the need for this variance was the access to these and
other rooms under her handicap condition. Mr. Edgar Shafer of 5405
SW 67 Avenue spoke in favor of granting this variance. No letters
of objection were received, and no objectors present at the meeting.
Mr. Vining, seconded by Mr. Foster, moved that the application
be approved as requested. Motion carried unanimously.
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the appli-
cation of Samuel Goldstein, owner of the E 143.40' of Tract 3,
Nelson Homesites, PB 39/57, for a change of zoning to allow the
construction of a single family residence. Requirements -EU-l an
Acre; proposed EU-lA half-acre. Location, approx. 6800 SW 67 Street.
Present at the meeting was Samuel Goldstein, owner of the property,
who spoke on behalf of his petition, stating the area to the .. South
is now ~ acre, and the area to the west is developed in less than
~ acre. No dedication of this property has been made by Mr. Goldstein,
7/30/63
however, Mr. Goldstein stated he would make the required dedication,
which would then be less than ~ acre, but he would have 2 lots
143' wide and 140' deep. That most of the so-called ~ acres are
125' wide and 135' deep. Mr. Keys advised Mr. Goldstein he would
not be complying with the Ci·ty' s ~ acre zoning.
Dr. J. B. Bynne, present at the meeting, spoke in objection to
rezoning, under the circumstances of smaller lots. Judge Floyd of
6800 SW 68 Street and Mrs. E. B. Carey of 6830 sw 67 Street stated
objections to the proposed rezoning.
Mr. Foster, seconded by Mr. Yakely, moved that the Planning and
Zoning Beard recommend to the City Council, that the application of
Mr. Goldstein be denied, based on the character of the neighborhood,
being established by an acre or more north and south of 68 Street.
After much discussion, Mr. Keys, seconded by Mr. Vining, moved
that the matter be tabled for further study, Mr. Foster and Mr.
Yakely withdrew the motion for denial. Polled on motion to table:
Yes, 7; No, 2.
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the appli-
cation of First Baptist Church of South Miami, tentative owner of
the N~ of SE~ of SE~ of SE~ of Section 26-54-40 and the E 155' of
W 340' of S~ of SE~ of SE~ of SE\ of Section 26-54-40, for a change
of zonin~ to permit the construction of a church. Present Zoning
5 acres on SW 67 Avenue, along sw 67 Avenue is EU-l and the rear
is EU-IA; 1.2 acres along Sunset Drive is EU-l; proposed RU-3.
Location 7050 SW 67 Avenue and 6751 Sunset Drive.
Present at the meeting at this time, was Chester Abney of
8300 SW 62 Avenue, who spoke in behalf of the applicant. Mr. Abney
stated the Church does not require an RU-3, if a variance was
granted, as they want to build a church and tenative plan provides
for 177 parking spaces for membership of 780 people.
Approximately 75 people appeared in objection to rezoning of
property, and the following people were heard:
Mr. Alvin, 1559 Trevens; Mr. J. Stamm, 6740 SW 69 Terrace;
Mr. H. Chauser, 6760 SW 69 Terrace; Mr. W. Lippman, 6780 SW 69
Terrace; Mr. L. Kalish, 6700 SW 69 Terrace; Judge Floyd, 6800
SW68 Street; Dr. Schecter, 6821 SW 69 Terrace; Mrs. Higgins,
6860 SW 68 Street; Mr. C. Kelly, 6951 SW 68 Court; Mrs. A.
Abbess. 6721 SW 69 Terrace; Mrs. George Neuberger, 7840 SW
71 Avenue; Mrs. E. Mirman, 6810 SW 69 Terrace; Mrs. L. Levelli,
6781 Sunset Drive; Mrs. DenbEeiijen, 6931 SW 68 Court; Mr. Max
Glassburn, 7029 SW 68 Court; Mr. Arthur Seitzler. 6781 SW 68
Terrace; Mr. W. Smith. 6761 SW 69 Terrace; Mr. A. Jenkins, 7/30/63
6780 SVJ 68 Terrace; Mrs. S. M. Martin, 6760 Sunset Drive;
The consensus of objections being the parking would adversely
affect the surrounding area; decrease in property valuation;
traffic hazards being created; the danger involved to pre-school
and school children in the area. Mrs. Martin objected to change
of zoning only, she would not object to a variance being granted,
similar to variances gran-ted to University Christian church.
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Foster, moved that the Planning and
Zoning Board recommend to the City Council tl;at subject property
in this hearing be granted a Use Variance permit, excluding 180 days,
granting lS mcnths, providing that walls consistent with the RU-S
zoning be placed along with landscaping all abutting property lines.
Mr. Foster, seconded by Mr. Brau, moved to amend the motion,
for requirement of paved sidewalks on Ludlam and Sunset Drive, as
a safety measure.
Polled on the amendment: Yes, 8; No, 1
Polled on the motion as amended: Yes S; No, 4.
Mr. Yakely, seconded by Mr. Stanton, moved to table the matter
for further s-cudy. Polled: Yes, 7; No, 2.
****
Tenative plat of Sunrise Estates, Third Addition was submitted
to the Board for approvai.
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Keys, moved that the Planning and
Zoning Board recommend to -the Ci-ty CounciL approval be granted
on tenative plat of Sunrise Estates, Third Addition. Polled:
Motion carried unanimously.
****
The Chairman read the letter to the City Manager dated July IS,
1963, from George F. Root, Jr., representing Dr. Fortner with
reference to parking spaces for Fortner Clinic Building.
After a short discussion, Mr. Brau, sec .~nded by Mr. Vini ng,
moved that the Planning and Zoning Board recommend to the City
Council approval as submitted for ten parking spaces. Polled:
Yes I 6; No, 3 ..
****
The next item on the agenda was request of opinion of the Board
regarding zoning and platting of certain section of Sec. 2 -S4-40,
Craig property.
3 7/30/63
•
The Chairman stated since Mr. Craig has already made appli-
cation for public hearing, there is no action for this Board to
take on this matter.
****
The Chairman appointed a committee to study the area of
Parcel #7, annexed property, which includes Goldstein property and
Craig property. Mr. Gibbs was appointed Chairman of the Committee,
together with Committeemen Myron Keys and J. C. Shaw. The Clerk
was directed to furnish the committee description of the area
involved together with drawings.
****
The election for Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Planning
and Zoning Board was held at this time. The nominating committee
submitted the n~mes to the Board, being no further nominations
from the Board, Mr. Keys, seconded by Mr. Foster, moved that the
nominations be closed. Motion carried. Mr. Corsiglia sent in a
sealed vote. Jack Stanton was elected Cahirman by a unanimous vote;
John Brau was elected Vice Chairman by an overwhelming vote.
****
Meeting adjourned at 11:15 p.m. upon motion duly made, properly
seconded and carried.
4 7/30/63
Present:
Absent:
****
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
AUGUST 13, 1963, CITY HALL, AT 8:00 p.m.
Jack Stanton, Chairman
John Brau
Sidney Efronson
Thomas T. Foster
Myron Keys
Carl Paden
J. C. Shaw
Harold Yakely
Albert Corsiglia, with permission
C. R. Gibbs
Edward Vining, Jr.
Mr. Yakely, seconded by Mr. Brau, moved that the minutes
of the regular meeting of July 30, 1963, be corrected to read
motion of Mr. Vining, seconded by Mr. Paden, to deny without
prejudice the application of Fisst Baptist Church, previous to
motion to table. Minutes were then unanimously approved as
corrected.
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the appli-
cation of E. L. Cotton for variance to display a real estate sign
on Lot 14 Block 1, Larkins Pines, approximate location 6161 South
Dixie Highway.
Present at the meeting at this time was E. L. Cotton, Jr.,
who stated they wished to sell this property of six lots and
would appreciate the opportunity to permit this sign for a short
time. He also wished to change his application to permit a sign
of 16 square feet, similiar to the size the City uses advertising
the notive of hearings. No objectors or letters of objection
were received.
Mr. Foster, seconded by Mr. Efronson, moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council, that the application
of E. L. Cotton be granted for one 16 square foot sign for a period
'of 6 months. Polled: Yes, 7; Absta.i.ned 1
****
The Chairman read 'the notive of public hearing on
cation of Gordon M. Albury, Jr., agent for J. A. King,
Lot 11 Block 7, Merion Park Manor, 2nd addition, for a
the appli-
owner of
variance to
8/13/63
erect a fence. Zoning requirements 5' fence inside front set-
back area; proposed 6' fence, location 6841 SW 66 Avenue.
Present at the meeting at this time was Mr. Albury, agent
for Mr. King, who spoke in behalf of his application that this
fence would insure visual privacy to the owner and neighbors; it
was not meant to intrude upon neighboring residents, and would
not cut down on the breezes. No objectors present and no letters
of objection received.
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Yakely, moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council this request be
denied. Polled: Yes, 3; No, 5.
Mr. Efronson, seconded by Mr. Foster, moved the the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the variance
as requested by Mr. King be granted. Polled: Yes, 3; No, 5.
After a lengthly discussion, Mr. Foster, seconded by Mr.
Efronson, moved to table this matter. Polled: Yes, 7; No, 1.
****
The Chairman read the noti~e of public hearing on the
application of Ross Industries, Inc., owner of the N 151.07'
of E 305' and the S 135' of Tract 2, Palm Miami Heights, for
a variance to permit the construction of apartments. Location
approx. 7720 SW 62 Avenue.
Present at the meeting at this time was Mr. Hugh Carrier,
representing Ross Industries Inc., Mr. Ross and Mr. Klebba, all
spoke in behalf of the petition for a two-story apartment building
with 42 units. This area is black-topped with dimensions of
151.07' by 305', presently zoned RU-l with a variance for parking
facilities when the shopping area was built. It has since been
determined there is very little parking there being "used for this
shopping area. They are not permitted to have lights there and
this area is sometimes used as a "lovers lane." An apartment
house would be an improvement to the area and act a s a buffer
between rear of shopping center and residential area on the south.
There is adequate parking and parking will not be in front of
the building.
Mr. Frank Tipton who lives directly across from Food Fair
inquired if servicing trucks for this shopping center would use
the rear of this shopping area, and was informed the entrance
would remain the same, therefore Mr. Tipton had no objection.
After much discussion by Board members, Mr. Brau, seconded
2 8/13/63
I
by Mr. Efronson, moved to table this matter for further study.
Polled: Motion carried unanimously. The Chairman appointed a
committee of two, Mr. Brau and Mr. Yakely, to study this matter.
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the appli-
cation of Raymond Craig, owner of a portion of SW~ of SE~ of NE~
and a portion of that part of the SE~ of SW~ of NE~ lying east
of FEC Railroad R/W all in Section 26-54·-40, for a change of
zoning. Annexed property, County zoning EU-l; proposed RU-l
single family.
Present at the meeting at this time was Mr. Craig, owner
of the property, who spoke in behalf of his request and ask for
rebuttal privileges to any objectors.
The following objectors were heard: Mr. Bob Bookbinder of
6845 SW 64 Street, his property in on an acre and if this change
of zoning is permitted he will be surrounded on three sides, when
he bought this property, the plan for the 5 acres around this
property was for one acre estates. The area is predominately
acre estates. Mr. Robert Asti of 6800 SW 64 Street whose home is
If directly across the street from the proposed rezoned property.
this change of zoning is granted, it would completely emasculate
the orderly process of zoning; the mere economic gain to the
owner of the prope~ty in question is not sufficient reason to
effect the rights of property owners who rely on the existing zoning.
Mr. Albert Holbert of 6974 SW 64 Street is strongly against a
change of zoning for this neighborhood. also speaking for Mrs.
Nelson, a property owner. Mr. Yohn of 6440 SW 69 Avenue, lives
150' from the property, did not receive notice of hearing. Built
home 3 years ago, strenously objects to change of zoning. Mr.
Roberts 6900 SW 64 Street, directly across the street, had bought
property from Mr. Craig and the understanding was this was one
acre zoning and moved here for that purpose. Objects to any change
of zoning for this area. Mr. Andrew Asmussen of 6901 SW 66 Street,
came down from the County for this one acre zoning and wishes it
to remain so, bought property from Mr. Craig with this understanding
that it was one acre zoning.
At this time tLe Chairman read the two letters of objection;
from R. F. Cook, Director of Metropolitan Dade County Building
Department and Mr. Robert Asti.
Mr. Craig then spoke in rebuttal, he did not sell to Mr.
Bookbinder but to a Mr. Stafford, wLo in 'curn sold to Mr. Bookbinder.
3 8/13/63
With reference to Mr. Asti comments, Mr. Craig bought his property
in 1946 when it was zoned for agriculture and believes he has the
same rights as when he bought the property. Mr. Craig did sell
to Mr. Roberts and this transaction was handled thru the builders.
The other people Mr. Craig believes are outside the 300' radius
of notification.
Mr. Hobart stated his property is definitely within 300' of
this property.
After much discussion, Mr. Foster, seconded by l>1r. Yakely,
moved tha"i: the lanning andoning Board recommend to the City
Council tha"i: th~s applica"i:ion for change of zoning be denied
without prejudice. Polled: Motion carried unanimously.
****
Mr. Paden, seconded by Mr. Efronson, moved that the tabled
application of Samuel Goldstein be removed from the table. Polled:
Yes, 4; No, 4. Application remains on table.
Mr. Brau, at this time asked that the report of t;1e committee
be given. The recommendation of the committee to the Board is
that RUIA north of Hardee Road (64 Street) and!2 acre estates
south of Hardee Road (64 Street) in this #7 area. This report
will be given to the Council with the recommendation that a
public hearing be called for this area, at which time the property
owners will be notified. Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Efronson, moved
the report be accepted. Yes, 7; No, 1.
Mr. Brau, who had requested to go out of order to take up
this matter of the committee, suggested they proceed with tabled
item B, First Baptist Church,
The Chairman read a letter of objection from Mr. and Mrs ..
Allan Abess. Several_members:,of the Board have been contacted
by telephone in objection to ·the construction of the church.
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Keys, moved to remove the tabled
without prejudice application of the First Baptist Church from
the table. Polled: Motion carried unanimously.
After a very lengthly discussion, Mr. Efronson, seconded
by Mr. Yakely, moved this matter be tabled for further study.
Polled:··Yes, 6; No, 2;
The Chairman appoin"i:ed a committee of Mr. Efronson, Mr. Yakely,
and the Chairman, Mr. Stanton for this study.
Ll· 8/13/63
****
Mr. Foster, seconded by Mr. Brau, moved tha"t the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the sign (one)
ordinance for commercial area of "for rents, leases, etc." be
changed to permit size of 16 square feet. Polled: Yes, 8; No, O.
**** The Chairman requested the Zoning Bulletin be furni~ed
to the members of the Planning and Zoning Board. Upon information
from the City Manager it was decided that thermofax copies would
suffice, and one original to be kept for records. The Clerk will
see that these bulletins are received by the members, and original
kept for records.
**** Mr. Keys stated the 0' Br ien Realty moved into "the old Carrie
Lawrence building corner 73 Sot and 59 Avenue and that their are
8 and 10 cars parked on the grass. Does he have a permit for
occupancy? The Chairman requested Mr. Gammage to have a report
on this at our next mee"ting. regarding this parking on unpaved
area.
**** The Chairman appointed a committee for t;1e next active
area of the annexed area, for study. and asked the City Manager
what parcel should be next. The City Manager replied that after
#7, probably be #2. It was suggested to combine area #1 and @.
Mr. Foster was appointed Chairman of this committee together with
Mr. Paden and Mr. Efronson. Report to be made to the Board with-
in two weeks.
Meeting adjourned at 10:40 p.m. upon motion duly made,
properly seconded and carried.
iiI
Present:
Absent:
****
MINU'IES OF THE :;<:':GiJLAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH ~lIAMI PLANNIllG AND ZONING BOARD
AUGUST 27, 1963, CITY HALL, AT 8:00 p.m.
John Brau, Vice Chair;:aan
Sidney Efronson
Thomas T. Foster
C. R. Gil:obs
Myron Keys
Carl Paden
Ed·,vardC. Vining, Jr.
Harold Yakely
Albert Corsiglia, vii th permission
J. C. Sh"'"'l
Jack Stanton, Chairman
Mr. Paden, seco::as,i by IJ::.:. I':fronson, moved that the minutes
of the regular meeting of A~g~st 13, 1963, be approved as individually
read. Polled: IJ:otion carried unanimously.
****
The Chairman read the notice 0= Fublic hearing on the appli-
cation of Elizabeth G. Dorosh, o':mer of Lot 2 Block 5, Twin Lakes
Manor, PB 57/54, for", variance on north side setback to permit
building a roof over 2n existing walled-in-storage area. Location
5621 Twin Lakes Drive. :;<equired 7.5'; proposed 3.1'
Mrs. Dorosh, present at the meeting at this time, spoke in
behalf of her petition, stated this would improve the appearance
of the property. No objectors present, and no letters of objection
were received.
Mr. Foster, seconded by Mr. ~Iakely, moved the Planning and
Zoning Board recom:nend denial cj the application of Mrs. Dorosh, as
the existing wall ?rea is extremely close to property line, and no
hardship has becn shown.
Mr. Vining urged the Board to defeat this motion, as the walls
were built before purch2sed by I·irs. Dorosh and very unsightly from
the canal side.
After much di'1cuGsion, the original motion was polled and defeated,
Mr. Vining, seconc':ed:0y l·rr. Bfronson, rooved that the application be
approved as applied for, and the Board recommend to the Council the
application of Hrs. Dorosh be granted. Polled: Yes, 6; No, 2.
8/27/63
****
Approximately 17 people were present, and due to an article
in the local newspaper in reference to a hearing, the Chairman asked
if any person had matters for ·the Board.
Mr. Carl Gluck asked about the committee report on the application
of the Baptist Church, stated he came to the meeting upon the report
in the paper. He stated the City Council and the Planning and Zoning
should make an effort to have the people properly informed.
The Chairman advised the application of the Baptist Church was
a tabled item and there would be no public hearing on the matter at
this meeting.
****
Mr. Foster, seconded by Mr. Keys, moved the tabled application
of J. A. King be removed from the table. Motion carried unanimously.
Following a short discussion, Mr. Foster, seconded by Mr. Vining,
moved that the Planning and Zoning Board recommend to the Council,
that the application of Mr. King be approved. Polled: Yes, 6; No, 2.
****
Tabled application of Samuel Goldstein remains on the table,
until the public hearing is held on Parcel #7, September 10, 1963,
which covers 'che same area.
****
The committee report on ·tabled application of the Baptist
Church was not available for this meeting, due ·to illness of the
Chairman of committee. Report will be made at the next regular
meeting, September 10, 1963.
****
The Chairman read the committee report on the annexed areas
#1 and if2 parcels, as follows:
CO~~ITTEE REPORT
The committee appointed by Jack Stanton, August 13, 1963
consisting of Carl Paden, Sid Efronson, and Tom Foster, met August 17,
and toured annexation area 'i·n whose approximate boundaries are:
East -57 Avenue
West -58 Avenue
North -8 i l· Terrace
South -86 Street
and annexation area #2 whose approximate boundaries are:
East -60 Avenue
West -62 Avenue 2
North -82 Street
South -84 Street 8/27/63
(committee report continued)
The committee also studied the zoning map of the adjoining
area.
The committee finds both of these annexation areas are con-
tiguous to RUIA areas. Most of the residential development in
these annexation areas is of an RUIA nature.
The committee recommends that a public hearing be held and
further recommends that annexation areas 1*1 and jn be rezoned from
interim zoning to RUIA.
Respectfully submi·tted,
/s/ Tom Foster, Chairman
/s/ Carl Paden
/s/ Sidney Efronson
Mr. Yak ely , seconded by Mr. Vining, moved the Board accept the
report of the committee. Polled: Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Foster, seconded by jvlr. Keys, moved the Planning and Zoning
Board submi~c ·chid report to the City Council. POlled: Motion
carried unanimously.
****
Mr. Yakely, seconded by Mr. Efronson, moved that the tabled
application of Ross Industries, Inc., be removed from the table.
Polled: Motion carried unanimously.
The Chairman then read the following letter addressed to the
Chairman, dated August 15, 1963 and signed by Raymond A. Ross, Jr.
Enclosed please find three copies of a revised
plot plan showing ·the tract labelled "A" which
is the subject of our previous request for
zoning variance.
You will note that this tract has dimensions of
135.0 feet frontage on S~] 62 Avenue, and a depth
of 305.0 feet.
This is tendered in accordance with your request
for a revised legal description to reflect only
the property which we anticipate conveying to
Frank Klebba, which is:
"The south 135.0 feet of the north 151.07 feet
of the east 305.0 feet of Tract 2, according to
amended plat of Palm Miami Heights, according to
plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 38 at page 52."
3 8/27/63
After a short discussion, Mr. Yakely, seconded by Mr. Brau,
moved that -the Planning and Zonins Board recommend to the City Council,
that the application of Ross Industries, Inc. be approved. Polled:
Motion carried unanimously.
****
The final plat of Sunrise Estates Third Addition was submitted
by A. D. Lewis to the Board for approval.
After verification that no changes were made since the tenative
plat of Sunrise Estates Third Addition was submitted and approved by
the Board on July 30, 1963, 11r. Efronson, seconded by Mr. Yakely,
moved that the Planning and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council,
the Sunrise Estates Third Addition plat be approved. Polled: Motion
carried unanimously.
** .. <r*
Mr. Gammage told -the Board he had made a report on the 0' Brien
matter with reference to the building on the corner of 73 Street and
59 Avenue, to the Adminis-i:ra-tive Department, as -this is a matter for
that Department.
****
Discussion on executive and non-executive meeting was held at
this time, and the consensus of opinion was to continue the existing
procedure.
*"k**
The Chairman remarked there would be a monthly meeting of the
South Miami chapter of the Florida Planning and Zoning Association
at Toby's Cafeteria, North 5~ Street on August 28, and would appre-
ciate it if any of the members could attend to represent South Miami.
****
The Chairman stated the Dade County Zoning Ordinance can be
purchased for $8.00 and he would like to recommend to the City Council_
that the City of South Miami have Zoning ordinance printed and made
available to the public for the price of printing and handling. The
recommendation was seconded by Mr. Gibbs, and carried unanimously.
****
There being no further business before the Board, meeting
adjourned at 9:15 p.m., upon motion duly made, properly seconded,
and carried.
~ 8/27/63
Present:
Absent:
~HH:~-;:-
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
SEPTEMBER 10, 1963 AT CITY HALL AT 8 p.m.
Jack stanton, Chairman
John Brau
Thomas T. Foster
C. R. Gibbs
Myron Keys
Carl Paden
J. C. Shaw
Edward Vining, Jr.
Harold Yakely
Albert Corsiglia (with permission)
Sidney Efronson
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Yakely, moved that the minutes of
the regular meeting of August 27, 1963, be approved as individually
read. Polled: Motion carried unanimously.
-::-~:-::--::-
The Chairman reversed item E 0 the agenda, in the interest of
the people present, and read the notice of the scheduled notice
on Parcel #7 for initial zoning of that area. The recommendation
'~V~Eeald-that the area North of Hardee Road should be RUIA, and u~ that the area South of Hardee Road should be one half acre estates.
At this time, pr[sent at the mectin~ W]S Samuel Goldstein, 6815
SW 69 Terrace, wished to go on record in favor of the recommendation
for the area South of Hardee Road for one-half acre estates.
Mr. Raymond ~. Craig of 6999 Hardee Road Helen Pennock of 6775
Hardee Road spoke in behalf of the recommendation.
The following objectors spoke before the Board: Mr. Robert Asti,
who read his letter of objections and filed with the Board 2 petitions
one with 15 objectors and one with 12 objectors. Mr. Asti was also
authorized to represent Mr. Bookbinder as objecting to change of
zoning. from an economic and aesthetic point of objection. Mr. Yohn
64~.0 Sd 69 Avenue concerned with the recommended zoning on North side
of Hardee. Mr. C. E. Morris of 6250 SH 67 Avenue, has Ii acre and
moved there because it WaS zoned for acerage. At the time the public
hearing Was held for annexation, Mr. Morris inquired at that time if
taken into the City would property be rezoned, and Council assured him
that was not the intention. He strenously objects to rezoning of thE
area, because of density. Mr. Sirkis of 6700 S\~ 64 Street, that when
he bought this property the deed clearly said that this 2 acre plot
would only be used for one family res::.dence. Mr. Andrew Asmussan of
6901 sw 66 street wishes to go on record he concurs with Mr. Asti for
the same reasons.
9/10/63
Mr. Craig of 6999 SW 64 street in rebuttal stated no arrange-
ments with Mr. Bookbinder, as property had been sold to a Mr.
Stafford from whom Mr. Bookbinder purchased said property.
Mr. Foster, seconded by Mr. Vining, moved that the Planning and
Zoning Board recommend to City Council that the area South of Hardee
be zoned EU-I. Polled: Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Keys, seconded by Mr. Shaw, moved that the Planning and
Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the area North of
Hardee Road be zoned RUIA.
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Yakely, moved to amend the motion to
read, that area fronting on Hardee Road be zoned EUIA, one lot deep,
as a buffer.
Polled on the amendment:
Polled on the motion:
·;i--;:·-;H:-
Yes, 6; No, 1 -2 No vote
Yes, 6; No, 3
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the a';plication
of S. M. Greene, owner of Lot 74 Block 13, Franklin Subdivision,
PB 5/34, for variances to permit the construction of a duplex.
Mr. Collier, representinc Mrs. Greene spoke in behalf of the
petition.
After discussion, Mr. Vining, seconded by Mr. Brau, moved to
table this application for further study, and the Chairman will
contact the owner and contractor regarding possible changes.
·;H:-~H~
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the application
of Mrs. Marvin Sokolow, tentative lessee, of store located on Lots
25, 26, Block 11, Townsite of Larkins, PB 2/105, for a variance to
allow a second-hanc-' store at 6843-45 Sil,j 59 Place. Pre sent C-2 location
second-hand store requires a C-3.
Mrs. Sokolow spoke in behalf of her petition, stating this would
be a Thrift Shop, operateo_ by a non-profit orfanization, the Chrildren's
Asthma Research Institute and Hospital, Breath of Life Chapter of
Miami, the shop would be run by volunteers from this Chapter. All
merchandise will be inside the store.
Mr. Vining, seconded by Mr. Keys, moved that the Planning and
Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that a special use
permit be issued to the local chapter (Breath of Life) of this
organiz~tion; to be revoked if the use is not continued by the same
organization. Polled: Motion carried unanimously.
~HHH:-
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the application
of Acolite Sign Co., agent for Ross Industries,Inc. owner of Tract 1,
Palm Miami Heights, for a variance to allow the erection of an
electrical sign at 6280-6272 South Dixie Highway.
After a short discussion, an, failure ot two motions, this matter
is deferred until the next regular Planning a~d Zoning Board meeting.
9-10-63
·:HH:··:~·
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the application
of Chester N. Rotter, owner of W SO' of Lot 4 Block 4, Fairglade
Park Subdivision, for a variance to allow the construction of an
acces sory building at 57S') ST-j 77 Terrace.
Present at the meeting at this time WaS Dr. Rotter who spoke in
behalf of his application. This building to be used for storage of
lawn mowers and equipment of this type. Letter from Mr. and Mrs.
Edward J. Stys of 5712 SH 77 Terrace has no objection to granting
of this variance. No letters of objection were received and no
objectors present at meeting.
Mr. Vining, seconded by Mr. Brau, moved that the Planning and
Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the variance be
granted as applied for. Polled: Motion carried unanimously.
·:HH:·~:-
The next item was the consideration of application
Goldstein. Mr. Yakely, seconded by Mr. Keys, moved to
tabled application of Samuel Goldstein from the table.
Motion carried_ unanimously.
of Samuel
remove the
Polled:
After a short discussion, Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Keys, moved
that the Planning and Zoning Boa~d recommend to the City Council
that the application of Samuel Goldstein be denied without prejudice.
Polled: Motion carried unanimously.
·;:-";:··;H:·
The next item for consideration Was the application of the
First Baptist Church. Mr. Yakely, seconded by Mr. Foster, moved
to remove from'the table~the application of the First Baptist Church.
Polled: Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Brau called for the report of the committee at this time.
The Committee report was read as follows:
COMMITTE"; REPORT ON BAPTIST CHURCH A,PLICATION
The committee was appointed by Chairman Stanton, August 13, 1963,
consisting of Mr. Stanton, Mr. Efronson and Mr. Yakely to study the
application of the First Baptist Church of South Miami, Florida, for
a change of zoning to permit the construction of a church activity
on an "L" shaped parcel of land located at approsimately 7050 Sj 67
Avenue and 6751 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida, consisting of
six (6) acres, more or less, of which the church is the potential
owner. Due to th~ -absence of Mr. Efronson, Mr. Stanton appointed
Mr. Brau as substitute member.
The committee met with the church Pastor and six members of the
Church. The views of the objectors were ascertained from Mr. Stamm.
Present zoning of abutting property is EU land/or EU lAo
3 9-10-63
After investigation of the facts and consideration of the
objections to the proposal of the church, the committee feels that
any chan: e of zoning, use variance cmd/or use permit should be subject
to the followin[ restrictions and/or canditions.
1. A solid masonry wall of at least 5 feet in height be pro-
vided along the North boundary, the SOl'th boundary along the
abutting Livelli property, ane. the Hest boundary where
presently no such wall exists. Where the existing wall meets
these requirements a new wall will not be required.
2. A sound barrier hedge of heavy foliage be provided to a
height of 8 feet and a depth of 6 feet along the north, west,
and south abutting the Alvin property boundary of the church
property. In addition the same shall be provided along the
east boundary adjacent to the Alvin property.
3. The exits and entrances shall be constructed as far as
possible to the Northeast (Ludlam Road) and Southwest (Sunset
Drive) extremities of this property as a traffic and safety
measure. No parking shall be permitted between the north
driveway and the north property line.
4. All outdoor light inC in the road and/or parking area shall
be by patented controlled beam lighting fixtures and placed
so that their rays of such lighting shall not reach beyond
the inner limits of the soune. barrier hedge noted in para-
graph 2 above.
5. Sidewalks shall be provided on Sunset Drive and Ludlam
Road as a safety measure.
6. That operation of a kindergarten on the church premises be
permitted provided such operation shall terminate its
activities not later than 4:30 p.m. daily.
7. It is recommended that no change of zonin, be permitted,
but that the Board confine its consideration to a use
variance.
For reference purposes it is noted that the Alvin property is
legally described .lB the S~ of SEt of SEt of the SEt less W 340'
in Section 26-54-40; and that the Livelli property is legally des-
cribed as the S 185' of the S~ of SEt of SEt of SEt in Sec. 26-54-40.
10 September 1963 /s/ Jack stanton, Chairman
/s/ Harole E. Yakely
/ s/ John ~J. Brau
The Chairman thankec1 the committee members for the work and
time they have put into this study.
4 9-10-63
A very lengthly discussion on the report followed, after which
Mr. Foster, seconded by Mr. Keys, moved that the Board accept and
adopt this committee report. Polled: Motion carried unanimously.
This matter WaS again discussed in creat detail, anc_ Mr. Brau,
seconded by Mr. Keys, moved that the Planninr and Zoning Board
recommenc_ to the City Council the c,ranting of a use variance to
the First Baptist Church of South Miami, on the property described
in their a0plication, provided the specifications, limitations, and
restrictions as stated in sub-paragraphs ill thru #6 of the accepted
committee report and made part, parcel and requirement of the use
variance. Polled: Yes, 6; No, 3.
~~-;: .. ;:~::-
The Board unanimously agreed to go on record as strenously
objecting to variance of Kathryn & H. John Ross of 4540 SW 62 Court,
County public hearing # 63-9-45 of lot frontage requirements to
permit resubdivision of one parcel of land into two single family
building sites: The Chairman c_irected the secretary to notify Mr.
R. F. Cook, director of Metropolitan Dade County Building and Zoning
Department, the action taken by this Board.
There being no further bus ness before the Board, meeting ad-
journed at 11:10 p.m., upon motion duly made, properly seconded and
carried.
Present:
Absent:
****
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
SEPTEMBER 24, 1963 AT CITY HALL AT 8 p.m.
Jack Stanton, Chairman
John Brau
Sidney Efronson
C. R. Gibbs
Myron Keys
Carl Paden
J. C. Shaw
Edward Vini ng, Jr.
Harold Yake1y
Albert Corsiglia (with permisson
Thomas T. Foster
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Keys, moved that the minutes
of the regular meeting of September 10, 1963, be adopted as
individually read. ~rr. Paden requested corrected of the word
"Board" in paragraph #2, and substitute the word "Committee",
minutes were unanimously approved as coorected.
'**** The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the
application of R: ;]. Brad1e!y;:of Florida Power & Light Company,
agent for Josephine Sturn, owner of the W 200' of the SE~ lying
South of Snapper Creek Canal R/W, of Section 36-54-40, for a
variance to permit the installation of an electric power sub-
station for the distribution of adequate electric service to the
immediate area. Zoning RU-IA, Location NE corner of SW 88 Street
(Kendall Drive) and SW 62 Avenue.
The Chairman read a letter from the Southern Flood Control
District stating the district offers no protest to the proposal of
R. J. Bradley of the Florida Power and Light Company, signed by
James W. Montcrief.
The Chairman read letter from Roscoe Jone of Metropolitan
Dade County, Florida, stating the proposed use would not be in
keeping with the surrounding residential estate area and would tend to
reduce property values in the neighborhood. Also stating there are
sites in relatively nearby commercial or industrial zones which would
be more suitable for this facility, and strongly urge that variance
be denied.
9/24/63
Of the 6 letters of notification to residents of South
Miami, 4 were returned stating no objection to variance being
granted, and one letter of no objection from Mr. and Mrs. Clifford
A. Straus, however, petitions with 236 signatures from this area,
together with letter from Pinecrest Civic Association in protest
of granting variance were received.
Mr. Carter, representative of Florida Power & Light Company
stated the demand for electric power has increased to the extent
that existing facilities will not be able to carry the load,and
this proposed electric power distribution substation is needed .. to
supply adequate service to existing customers in South Miami, and
for newcomers in a rapidly developing section. This substation
would be unattended except for maintenance of landscaping , trans-
formers or switching equipment. All dedications required by the
City will be made.
The following people were present and heard in objection
to the variance being granted, David Popper, Gene Essinger 6240 SW
86 Street; Frank R. Rotolanti, 5745 SW 4 Street; president of
Pinecrest Civic Association; Mr. Abick, 6140 N. Kendall Drive; Dr.
~. Sullivan, 3400 SW 57 Avenue, Mr. Nevill M. Sanger, property owner
across street from proposed substation. Mr. Popper was speaking in
behalf of the people on 85 Street, 86 Street and also County property
owners in the area,
Mr. Keys, seconded by Mr. Paden, moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council this application
be denied.
After further discussion, Mr. Efronson, seconded by
Mr. Gibbs, moved that this matter be tabled. Polled, Yes, 8;
No, 1; Abstained None. (Committee appointed by Chairman for study.)
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the
application of Richard O. Erdlitz of the Atlantic Refining Company,
agent for Thomas F. Jardine, owner of Lots I, 2, 3 and the North
20' of Lots 24, 25, 26 of Block 1 of Westerfield Manor, Sec. 3,
PB 27/9, for a change of zoning to allow a service station.
Present zoning C-l Lots 1, 2 and 3 ) Proposed C-2.
RU-l Lots 24, 25, 26) Location SE corner SW 59 Ave. and
Bird Road.
Mr. Erdlitz spoke in behalf of his petition, they have
agreement to purchase properi:.y, and that this would be a modern
service station.
2 9/24/63
The Chairman read letter of objection from Roscoe Jones,
Director of Me-tropolitan Dade County Planning Department, stating
they are opposed to making zoning on subject parcel less restrictive
as a C-2 use would not be in keeping with other uses in the neighbor-
hood and would downgrade the neighborhood. also there are sufficient
gasoline s-ta-tions along Bird Road at -the present -time.
Petitions of objection with 54 signatures were received.
Mr. Harold Jones, present at -this time, stated he lives at 5894 SW
41 Street, across from the proposed station. He objects to change
of zoning which would adversely affect his property.
After a short discussion, Mr. Efronson, seconded by Mr.
Gibbs_, moved that the Planning and Zoning Board recommend to the
City Council, that the application be DENIED. Polled: Yes, 9;
No, 0; Abstained, None.
****
The Chairman then considered the annexed areas, known as
Parcels #1 and 2.
The Chairman read let-i:er from Roscoe Jones, Director of
Metropolitan Dade County PlanningBoard, which stated they believe
the zoning should be in keeping with surrounding residential areas
and wholeheartedly agree with the classification of RU-IA as
favored by -the South Miami Commi-ttee of the Planning and Zoning
Board. No objectors present, and no letters of objection received.
Mr. Yakely, seconded by Mr. Efronson, moved that U,e
Planning and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that
annexation areas #1 and In be initially zoned RU-lA. Polled:
Yes, 8; Abstained -I, J. C. Shaw
****
Mr. Br?-u seconded by Mr. Keys; moved that tabled
application of Mrs. S. M. Greene be removed from the table. Polled:
Yes, 9; No, 0; Abstained, None.
After a short discussion, Mr. Vining, seconded by
Keys, moved that the Planning and Zoning Board recommend to
City Council that the variances as petitioned be approved.
Yes, 8; No, 1; Abstained, None.
****
Mr.
the
Polled:
Mr. Keys, seconded by Mr. Gibbs, moved that the tabled
application of Acolite Sign Company for Ross Industiris, Inc. be
removed from the table. Polled: Yes, 9; No, 0, Abstained, None.
3 9/24/63
After much discussion, Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Keys,
moved that the Planning and Zoning Board recommend to the City
Council that the application be denied, as no hardship has been
shown. Polled: Yes, 6; No, 3; Abstained, None.
****
The Chairman appointed the following committees:
**** Edward Vining, Chairman, with Mr. Efronson and ~tr. Stanton
for study on the application of Florida Power and Light Company for
electric power substation.
**** The Chairman appointed J. C. Shaw, Chairman, together with
Mr. Gibbs and Mr. Vining for the committee to study the annexed
area of Parcel 8, for recommendation on zoning.
**** The Chairman appointed Mr. Keys, Chairman togetner with
Mr. Paden and Mr. Yakely as a committee to study the annexed area
known as Parcels #9 and #10 for recommendations on zoning.
****
The Chairman read a format and procedure for Planning and
Zoning Board Agenda, as follows:
"The Planning and Zoning Board Agenda will be corrected
and prepared as follows:
1. Initial zoning when applicable
2. Public hearings in chronological order
(Note) THE FOLLOWING ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION IN
EXECUTIVE SESSION ONLY
4. Tabled items showing date tabled, with all
necessary material pertaining thereto attached
5. Committee Reports
6. Remarks
The Building Department will prepare the agenda and send
notices of public hearings to concerned property owners on the
paid public hearing applications. Only 3 public hearings to be
scheduled for each meeting (exclusive of tabled items)unless other-
wise directed by Chairman of the Planning and Zoning Board.
The Building Department will advise the Public Works
Department for signs to be posted in the area on the above public
hearings.
The Building Departmen·t will prepare the drawings for
the City Clerk, in preparation of the City Council agenda, and for
the information to the Planning· and Zoning Board.
4 9/24/63
When a public hearing is held that contains more than
2~ acres, or is divided into more than 5 parcels, the notice of
public hearing will be published one time only, at least 15 days
before the da-te of the hearing, in a newspaper of general circula-
tion in the City.
The City Clerk, as Clerk will obtain approval from the
Chairman of the Planning and Zoning Board for publication on
INITIAL ZONING, when initial zoning is directed by the City Council.
The Clerk will give notice -to Building Department for placing this
zoning on the agenda for the appropriate date. The Clerk will notify
all property owners regarding init_ial zoning, and secure any material
pertaining thereto for the Committees appointed for study of area,
prior to recommendations to 'che Board, and prior to report of sub:-.
mission to City Council when directed by the Board.
The City Clerk, as Clerk will maintain record of Minutes,
a miscellaneous correspondence file, and record of Zoning Bulletin
for the Planning and Zoning Board.
/s/ Jack Stanton, Chairman
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Gibbs, Mr. Keys, moved that the
format and procedure be adopted. Polled: Yes, 9; No, O. Abstained,
None.
There being no further business before the Board, Mr.
Vining, seconded by Mr. Paden, moved to adjourn. Motion carried;
meeting adjourned at 10:20 p.m.
5 9/24/63
,
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING O~ THE
SOUTH MIMH PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
OCTOBER 8, 1963 AT CITY HALL AT 8:P.M.
Present: Jack Stanton, Chairman
John Brau
Absent:
~i-~~HH~-
Sidney Efronson
C. R. Gibbs
Myron Keys
Carl Paden
J. C. Shaw
Edward Vining, Jr.
Harold Yakely
Thomas T. Foster
Albert Corsiglia (with permission)
There being no objection, the minutes of the regular
meeting of September 24, 1963 were approved as individually read.
~H:*~i--;~-
The Chairman read the notice of Public hearing on the
application of M. Earl Perkins, owner of Lot 2, Block 1 Law-
rence Homesites, PB 42-32, for a variance of 5.51' on lot
frontaee to allow the construction of a residence. Approximate
location 6444 Sunset Drive.
Mr. and Mrs. Perkins appeared in behalf of the application.
Mr. and Mrs. Joe Creelan, 6450 Sunset Drive, appeared
as objectors.
Action:
Mr. Vining, seconded by r,!r. Keys, moved that the Baud
recommend to the City Council that the application of M. Ero'l
Perkins for a variance in lot frontage be approved.
Polled: Yes -9; No -1
~HHH:-
Mr. Keys, seconded by Mr. Gibbs, moved that the appli-
cation of R. J. Bradley of the Florida Power & Light Company
be removed from the table for consideration.
Carried unanimously.
Mr. Vining, Chairman of the Committee. appointed to study
this matter, submitted the following report:
-1-10/10/63
COMMITTEE TO DETERMINE RECOMMENDATIONS
CONCERNING ApPLICATION OF FLORIDA POWER
AND LIGHT COMPANY FOR VARIANCE FOR POWER
SUBSTATION.
Committee Chairman: Edward C. Vining, Jr.
Committee Members: Jack stanton & Sidney Efronson
The Members set forth above having heretofore been appoint-
ed as a Committee to study and make a recommendation to the South
Miami Planning and Zoning Board; and the Committee having met
in formal session on the 4th day of October, 1963; it is respect-
fully submitted that the recommendation of the Committee is as
follows:
1. That the variance as applied for by Florida Power and
Light Company for the erection of an electric power station
on the property described as the Hest 200 feet of the SE 1/4,
lying South of the Snapper Creek Canal r/w, of Section 36-54-40;
Be recommended to the City Council.
2. That the variance be limited to and conditioned upon
the building site being improved in conformance with the Plat
Plan Layout as submitted by Florida Power and Light Company,
and which is made a part of this recommendation.
3. That the variance be further conditioned upon the
construction of an "open block design" wall of not less than
20 feet in height, a similar type construction picture having
been submitted by Florida Power and Light Company, and made
a part of this recommendation.
The foregoing recommendation is made and based upon the
Committee's findings as follows:
a. That there is a definite public need for this facility
in this location.
b. That some of th p existing poles will be moved "inSide"
the walled encl~sure.
c. That the noise will be only a elight "Hum", audible
for approximately 100 feet.
d. That the Substation will necessitate only a minimum
amount of "truck service", and will not be used as a
storage area or base of any operations.
e. That the enclosure will not do any violence to the
surrounding neighborhood.
f. That this parcel is odd-sha.ped and lends itself to
this unusual type of improvements.
-2-10/10/63
g. That because this parcel abuts the now existing trans-
mission lines, that it will not be necessary to run
large "feeder" lines to the Substation.
DATEB this 8th of October, 1963.
/s/ Edward C. Vining, Jr.
Jack Stanton
Sidney Efronson
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Gibbs, moved to accept the
committee report. Carried unanimously.
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Gibbs, moved.tha t the Board
recommend to the City Council that the application of the Florida
Power and Light Company be approved; providing, however, that
the variance be limited to and conditioned upon the building site
being improved in conformance with the Plot Plan Layout as sub-
mitted by Florida Power and Light Company, and which is made a
part of this recommendation; and further that the variance be
conditioned upon the construction of an "open block design" wall
of not less than 20 feet in height, a similar type construction
picture having been submitted by Florida Power and Light Company,
and made a part of this recommendation.
Polled: Yes -7; No -3
~HHH:·
Mr. Shaw, Chairman of the committee apryointed to study
the initial zoning of recently annexed parcels #8 and #9, sub-
mitted the following report:
COMllITTEE TO DETERMINE RECOMMENDATIONS AS TO
ZONING IN RE AREAS DESIGNATED 8, AREAS DESIG-
NATED 9
Committee Chairman, J. C. Shaw
Committee members, Edward C. Vining, Jr., C. R. Gibbs
The members mentioned above having heretofore been appoint-
ed a committee to study and recommend zoning on the areas desig-
nated 8 and 9, said areas having been annexed into the City of
South Miami from the unincorporated areas; and the committee hav-
ing personally made its inspection tour, together with various
conversations with residents in the neighborhood, it is respect-
fully submitted that the recommendation of the committee is as
follows:
1. That the area designated No. 8 is at the present time
completely platted into residential subdivision lots and is im-
proved, save and with the exception of a 100 ft. strip of land
lying between Blocks 3 and 4 of Blue Heights Subdivision as shown
in Plat Book 64, page 136, which unplatted portion has a 100 ft.
frontage abutting on S.W. 67th Avenue (Ludlum Road) and
-3-10/10/63
running through the block to S,W, 66th Avenue, and is approx-
ima tely 330 ft. long '.
Inasmuch as all of the lots, save the unplatted area, are
improved with single fae,lily res !,uenc2s, a nd inasmuch as the un-
platted portion will probably be divided into two building sites;
one fronting on each of the avenues heretofore described, it is
therefore recommended by the committee that this area be zoned
RU 1, 75 ft. frontage, 10,000 sq. ft. (minimum lot size require-
ments).
2. That the area uesignated No. 9 which is an unplatted
area located at the S.E, cornor of Ludlum Road (67th Avenue) and
Blue Road (S.W. 48th Street), Hhich area at the present time has
been cleared of debris and some fill placed thereon, and which
area is surrounded by the unincorporated area on two sides, which
zoning is designated at the present time Dade County RU 1, and
the said area No. 9 being abutted on the South by RU 1 zoning,
it is recommendeu by the committee that this unplatted area be
zoned RU 1, confol°tr'ing Kitlce tl~~ neighborhood,
DATED this 30th da;r of S·pter.loer, 1963_
R2spectfully submitted,
/s/ J. C. Shaw, Chairman
Edward C. Vining, Jr.
C. R. Gibbs
Mr. Efronson, seconded by I'ir. Yakely, moved to accept the
commi ttee report. Carr~,ecJ un:cnirr:ou~;ly.
Mr. Foster, secC'nleu by ]\11'_ Vining, moved that the report
be forwarded to the City Council ,lith the recommendation that
a Public Hearing be held to determine the initial zoning on these
parcels. Carried unanimously,
.:~-::--:~-.;~-
Mr. Keys, Chain:an of the committee appointed to study the
initial zoning of recently annexed Parcel #5, submitted the follow-
ing report:
The Committee, ,"u'line; made D. personal inspection and study
of the annexeu areo. known [>8 Parcel #5, find that the West
330 feet is presently zoned RU-3 and the remainder RU-l.
The Committee is cognizant of the fact that the area is
primarily RU-l ~wd tb.at the TIU--3 area is probably not in
the best intcre8t of the neighbo:.'hood, but any change of
zoning woulJ, no doubt, ,cOlO" a hardship on the present
use and occupancy of ~he RU-3 area.
-4-10/10/63
---
Therefore, it is the recommendation of this Committee,
to the Planning and Zoning Board, that there be no change
in the zoning of Parcel #5.
lsi Myron Keys
Carl Paden
Harold Yakely
Mr. Foster, seconded by Mr. Yakely, moved to accept the
committee report. Carried unanimously.
Mr. Foster, seconded by Mr. Brau, moved that the report
be forwarded to the City Council with the recommendation that
a Public Hearing be held to determine the initial zoning on this
parcel. Carried unanimously.
<{HHH~·
There being no further business to come before the Board
at this time, the meeting was adjourned by general consent at
9:15 P.M.
-5-10/10/63
Present,
Absent'
****
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ~illETING OF THE
SOUTH MI~I PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
OCTOBER 22, 1963 AT CITY HALL AT 8 p.m.
Jack Stanton, Chairman
John Brau
Sidney Efronson
Thomas T. Foster
C. R. Gibbs
l"lyron Keys
Carl Paden
J. C. Shaw
Edward C. Vining, Jr.
Harold Yakely
Albert Corsiglia (with permission)
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Keys, moved that the minutes of
the regular meeting of October 8, 1963 be approved as individ-
ually read. Motion carried unanimously.
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the appli-
cation of IV. W. Charles, attorney for the Es"tate of Harold W.
Dorn, owner of SE corner SW'4 of Sec. 25-54-40 and North along
East line of SW!.! for 200', West parallel "to South line, and
South parallel to East line of SW!.! for 200', East along South
line for 205' to POB, for a variance or special use permit to
allow the construction of a gasoline service station. Present
zoning C-l; proposed Use C-2; Location NW corner of Sunset Drive
and SIV 62 Avenue.
The Chairman read letters of objection from Mr. and Mrs.
David A. Brooks and Mr. and Mrs. P. D. Loyless.
Mr. Charles spoke in behalf of his petition stating the
gran"ting of this petition would have no effect on pedestrian
traffic, and vehicular traffic would have visibility, due to
the building line, which would differ from other C-l uses.
Mr. Mas"ton 0' Neill, owner of property opposi"te the Dorn
property stated he has no objection to the proposed service
station.
The following people were heard in objection of granting
a change of zoning, or variance for a service station:
10/22/63
Mr. Elmer Bregman, representing Edelphia Builders, who own
4 acres directly West, which will be used for apartment houses,
with mortgage of $900,000 and when completed the value will be
l~ million, therefore he object to a service station, as this
area is now being upgraded, and they do not want their investment
jeopardized.
Mr. and Mrs. James Cothron, owners of property North of the
proposed station, object on the grounds this would be detrimental
to their investment.
Mr. Hans Wedemeyer, owner of 4 lots across the street from
the proposed station, cited that 2 filling station in Coral Gables
were removed and one site replaced with over a million dollar
building. The other site has been landscapped and enhanced the
area. Mr. Wedemeyer objects to a filling station in this area.
Mr. Foster, seconded by Mr. Keys, moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council, that the appli-
cation of \'J. W. Charles for estate of Harold W. Dorn be denied
as sufficient hardship has not been shown to warrant a change
of zoning, variance or special use permit. Polled: 9 Yes; No, 0,
Abstained -1 -Edward Vining.
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the appli-
cation of E. L. Cotton, owner of Lots 12, 12A, 13, 13A, 14, 14A
Block 1 and Lots 17, 18, 19, 20 of Block 2 Larkins Pines, for a
variance to permit a Used Car business. Present zoning C-2;
proposed C-3, location 6150 South Dixie Highway. (corrected)
The Chairman read let'ters of objection from: Raymond Fox,
Mr. and Mrs. \'Jilliam O. Peacon, Alfred F. Hagan, and Mr. and
Mrs. George Fox.
11r. E. L. Cotton appeared before the Board and requested
Lots 17, 18 of Block 2 be withdrawn from the application, as
these were added in error.
Mr. George Fox, presen't at this time, withdrew his objection
due to the withdrawal of Lots 17 and 18 in Block 2, as requested
by Mr. Co'cton. Mr. Hagan also requested wi,thdrawal of his letter
of objection for the same reason.
Mr. Yakely, seconded by Mr. Gibbs, moved that ,the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council 'the approval of
request of E. L. Cotton as amended in open meeting, for a u~e
variance to permit a Used Car husiness at 6150 South Dixie Highway.
2 10/22/63
Polled, 6 Yes; No, 0; 4 Abstained; Mr. Paden and Mr. Efronson
wished to go on record, "they abstained because they considered a
variance wrong. Mr. Stanton abstained, he is no"t opposed to the
Used Car Lot, but felt he needed more information.
**"*The Chairman, at this time asked the Board to take up Item ~-p4
on the agenda, and read the notice of public hearing on the appli-
cation of Tom Fossey, agent for Dr. Robert H. Sykes, owner of the
S~ of S~ of NEl.o of Sec. 35-54-40, excep-cing therefrom the E 1013.42'
and the South 35' and t"e West 25', for a change of zoning to allow
Garden--type apartments. Presen-c Zoning RU-3; proposed RU-4; Loca-
tion NE corner of SW 80 S>creet and Sy,) 69 Avenue.
The Chairman s-tated this property is in Interim Zoning, and
public hearing will be held in the very near fu"ture, -therefore it
would be impossible for -this Board to take any action at this
time.
Mr. Tom Fossey requested the right to withdraw this application
without prejudice, and to refile wi-thout addi-cional cost, after
action has been made on the interim zoning.
Mr. Robert Gardner of 7821 SW 69 Avenue commented (for the
Board's information) this property came before the County Commission
in April of 1963, for change of zoning to RU-4 to permit a nursing
home and was denied.
Mr. Yakely, seconded by Mr. Brau, moved that the Board accept
the withdrawal of Mr. Tom Fossey without prejudice, and that he
be permitted to refile without additional cost. Polled, Yes, 10;
No, 0; Abstained, None.
****
The Chairman relinquished the chair to Vice Chairman John Brau,
who read the notice of public hearing on the application of H. W.
Burris, agent for A. D. Henry, owner of Lot 16 Block 5, TOWNSITE
of LARKINS PB 2/105, for a change of zoning. Present zoning C-l
proposed C-2; Location, approx. 6121 SW 68 Street.
The Vice Chairman read a letter dated October 21, 1963 from
H. W. Burris, requesting an amendment to his application for a
Use Permit or Use Variance, thus deleting the original request
for change of zoning. Mr. Burris also submitted a petition from
the surrounding proper"ty owners stating NO OBJECTIONS to the
proposed Print Shop.
3 10/22/63
r
'--'
,,~
L
L
· -
Mr . Gibbs, seconded by ~'lr . Yake l y, moved that the Planning
and Zonin g Board recommend to the City Council that the appli-
cation as modified be granted for a Use Variance. Polled: Yes 9;
No, 0; Mr. Stanton had no part whatsoever in ma-tters pertaining
to this application, as he is financially involved in subject
property .
****
The Chairman and the Planning and Zo~ing Board -then considered
the request of Mr . Herschel Green to discuss suggested layout of
new subdivision .
Af-ter much discussion and -the reviewing of tenative plans,
the Board d id not give an expression on -this matter, as some of
the members had not studi e d t h e area, nor the tenative plans
previewed .
**-1:*
Mr. Keys inquired of Mr . Bach the requirements of Ordinance
pertainin g to trailers being parked in residential areas . Mr.
Keys advised -there is one on 59 Court be-tween 7 <1 and 76 Street,
and has been there for some time.
****
Mr . Brau, seconded by Mr . Yakely, moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council tha -c there be
no disbursement of any City monies issued to the i'ie -cro Dade
County Planning Department, or any other Department of Metro
Government of Dade County f or any matter pertainin g to the
City of South Miami Planning and or Zoning . Polled : Yes, 10i
No, o.
There being no further business before the Board, upon
motion duly made, properly seconded, and carried; meeting ad-
journed at 10 ,30 p.m.
fl-10/22/6 3
Present:
Absent:
****
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
NOVE¥iliER 12, 1963, AT CITY HALL, 8:00 p.m.
Jack Stanton, Chairman
John Brau, Vice Chairman
James Bowman
Sidney Efronson
Thomas T. Foster
Myron Keys
Carl Paden
J. C. Shaw
Edward Vining, Jr.
Harold Yakely
C. R. Gibbs
Mr. Paden, seconded by Mr. Efronson, moved "that the minutes .:,!'
of "the regular meeting of October 22, 1963 be approved as indiv-
idually read. Motion carried unanimously.
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on initial
zoning of Parcel No. 5 as follows: Beginning a"t the N\v corner
of the S~ of the S\'J\ of the SE!;, of the NE\ of Sec"i:ion 35, Twp.
5·'c South, Range t~O East, Dade Coun"cy, Florida; thence run East-
erly along the North line of said S~ of the S\'J l• of "i:he SEl;; of the
NEl;; to the Nlv corner of Ludlam Groves, according to the Plat there-
of recorded in Plat Book 51 at Page 48 of the Public Records of
Dade County, Florida; "thence run Southerly along the \'Jest line of
Ludlam Groves to a point on the South line of "the NE\ of said
Section 35 and the centerline of the SW 80 Street (David Road)
thence run Ivesterly along the South line of said NEl;;, being the
centerline of SI') 8U Street (Davis Road) to "he t)\'J corner of the
SE\ of the NEl;; of said Section 35; thence run Northerly along
the West line of the ";E~ of the NEl;; of said Section 35 to the N\V
corner of "the s;, of the SW'~ of the SEl;; of the NE\ of said section
35 and tl.e Point of Beginning.
The Chairman advised "the people present "thai: the recommenda-
tion of the Committee, which was unanimously approved by the
Planning and Zoning Board, had been forwarded to the City Council
was as follows: "The Committee, having made a personal inspection
and study of "the annexed area known as Parcel #5, find that the
West 330 feet is presently zoned RU-3 and the remainder RU-l. The
Committee is cognizant of the fact that the area is primarily RU-l
and tha"i: the RU-3 area is probably not in "the best interest of the
11-12-63
neighborhood, but any change of zoning would, no doubt, work a
hardship om the present use and occupancy of "the RU-3 area.
Therefore, it is the recommendation of this Committee, to the
Planning and Zoning Board, that there be no cLange in the zoning
of Parcel itS." :I'he Board reaffirms their recommendation to the
Ci ty Council on the ini"tial zoning of this area, commonly known
as Parcel jf5, -the zoning of this area remain status quo.
Present at the meeting, Robert W. Gardner of 7871 SW 69 Ave.,
who requested the Board to recommend the entire parcel be zoned
RU-l or RU-IA for single family residences, as property abutting
Parcel #5 is presently zoned RU-l. County property on West is
zoned EU-l acre estates, and County property on South is RU-2.
Mr. R. E. Chapman, Dr. Carl Snyder and Mr. W. A. Gravatt
spoke in agreement with Mr. Gardner's request.
Peti"tions with 19 names, together with letters from Mr. Cook
of Metropolitan Dade County and Mr. Coburn of Dade County Planning
Board asking to go on record recommending Parcel \F5 be rezoned
RU-l.
Mr. Paden, seconded by Mr. Brau, moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council present zoning
be retained, and Parcel ~"f5 remain status quo. POlled: Motion
carried unanimously. (tl,is parcel is split zoning -RU-l and RU-3.l
****
The Chairman read t:he notice of public hearing on the initial
zoning of Parcel #8 as follows: Beginning a"t the SW corner of
the Nvl% of the SVI1,; of Section 2'1", Twp. 54 South, Ramge 40 East;
thence in a Northerly direction along the centerline of SW 67 Ave.
(Ludlam Road) to the NW corner of the SW~ of the NW~ of the SW~ of
Section 24, Twp. 54 South, Range 40 East; thence in an Easterly
direction to the NE corner of the W~ of the SW~ of the NW~ of the
swl:, of Section 2'i, Twp. 54 South, Range 40 East; thence in a
Southerly direction tothe SE corner of the vl~ of the sw\ of the
Nlv\ of "the .s\",]~ of Section 24, Twp. 54 South, Range 40 Bast; thence
in a \'7esterly direction 330 fee"t more or less to the centerline
of SW 67 Ave. (Ludlam Road) also the SW corner of the NWl:, of the
Sw\ of Section 24, Twp. 54 South, Range 40 East; to the POB.
Mr. Lawrence Berger of 6530 Svl 49 Terrace, Mr. Alfred Groden
of 6485 Slil 52 Street and David Commander 6601 SW 49 Terrace
requested to go on record being opposed to any change of zoning.
The Committee report which was unanimously approved by the
Planning and Zoning Board for Parcel #8 is as follows:
2 11-12-63
1. That the area designated as Parcel #8 is at the present
time completely platted into residential subdivision lots and
is improved, with the exception of 100' strip lying between Blocks
3 and 4 of Blue Heigh-ts Subdivision, PB 64/136 which unplatted por-'
tion has frontage abutting on ~W 67 Avenue and running thru the block
to SW 66 Avenue approx. 330' long. All lots are improved with
the above exception which will probably be divided into two build-
ing sites. It is -therefore recommended that t"is area be zoned
RU-l, 75' frontage; 10,000 sq ft (min. lot size requirements).
¥~. Paden, seconded by Mr. Brau, moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council present zoning
Ru-l be retained, and Parcel #8 remain status quo. Polled:
Motion carried unanimously.
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the initial
zoning of Parcel #9 as follows: Beginning at the NW corner of the
SW~ of Section 24, Twp. 54 South, Range 40 East, Dade County,
Florida being the intersection of the centerline of SW 67 Avenue
(Ludlam Road) and Svl 48 Street (Blue Road); thence run Easterly
along the North line of the SW~ of said Section 24, and the center-
line of dW 48 Street (Blue Road) to the NE corner of the NWl:; of the
NWl:; of the svJ~ of said Section 24; thence run Southerly along the
East line of the NW~ of the NWl:; of the SW~ of said Section 24, to
the SE corner of the N~ of the NWl:; of the NWl:; of the SW~ of said
Section 24; thence run itJesterly along the South line of -the N~ of
the N>v~ of 'che NWl:; of the swl:; of said Section 24, 'co the SW corner
of the Nl::; of the NW~ of the NVJ~ of the ';;;W~ of said Section 24,
being a poin>c on the cen-terline of SitJ 67 Avenue (Ludlam Road) ;
thence run Northerly al?ng the West line of the SWl:; of said Section
24, and the centerline of the Svl 67 Ave. to the NW corner of the
SW'. of said Section 24-and the POB.
The Committee report which was unanimously approved by the
Planning and Zoning Board on Parcel #9 is as follows: Area is an
unplatted area located at SE corner of 67 Avenue and SW 48 Street
which at the present time has been cleared of debris and some fill
placed thereon, and area is surrounded by the unincorporated area
on two sides. -which -is Dade County zoning RU..,l ~ and_ said area
No. 9 being abutted on the South by RU-l. it is recommended by the
Committee that this unplatted area be zoned RU-l conforming with
the neighborhood.
Mr. Paden, seconded by Mr. Brau, moved that the Planning and
Zoning Board recommend to the City Council present zoning RU-l
be retained and Parcel No. 9 remain status quo. Motion carried
unanimously.
3 11-12-63
****
The Chairman read tl'e notice of public hearing on the
application of David Jo Felton, owner of Lot 11 Sunset Circle,
PB 48/5 for a variance to allow the construction of a swimming
pool and addition to residence. Required, Residence 25'; Pool
15'; Proposed 10' residence setback; Pool 13.5' setback. Loca-
tion 6851 Sunset Drive 0
Mr. David Felton spoke in behalf of his application, he had
contacted both owners of Lots 9 and 10 who had no objection to
the variance being grantedo Letters are on file from Clarence
pope owner of Lot 10 and John Gavras owner of Lot 9 stating no
objections to the proposed variance.
No objec"tors presen"i: and no letters of objection received.
Mro Yakely, seconded by Mr. Vining, moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the Ci"ty Council that the variances
as requested by Mr. Felton be granted. Polled: Yes, 6; No, 4.
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the
application of David Hill, owner of a part of Sec. 36-54-40, for
a variance "to permit a Used Car business. Present Location
zoned C-2; used car lot requires a C-3 zoning. Location 6400
Sout" Dixie Highway.
Mr. Hill spoke in behalf of his application stating there
would be no repairs, no painting, etc., and would not display
more "than 8 cars. He had no objection to a Special Use "Permit
rather than a Variance being granted 0
No objectors and no letters of objection received.
Mr. Vining, seconded by Mr. Brau, moved that the Planning
and Zonigg Board recommend to the City Council that a Special Use
Permit limited to 8 cars maximum be granted. Polled: Yes, 8;
No, 2.
****
The Chairman read the nO~lce of public hearing on the
application of "the American Cancer Society, lessee Marguerite
Kaiser, Executii(e Director, for a variance to operate a Thrift
Shop at 5850 Sunset Drive, Lot 16 W.A. Larkins, PB 3/198.
The Chairman stated he had received letters of objection
from Mary IV. Dorn, Norman Weingarten.
Mr. John Channing and Mrs. Kaiser spoke in behalf of the
petition, also Mrs. Benjamin Bosch and Mrs. Long.
4 11-12-63
Mr. Joseph Steinberg, owner of Rhodes Furniture Store spoke
in objection to granting the variance as this would devalue the
neighborhood and the shopping area on Sunset Drive.
After a 1engthly discussion of pros and cons, Mr. Brau
seconded by Mr. Efronson, moved that this matter be tabled
for further study. Polled: Yes, 7; No, 3.
The Chairman appointed a committee of: Chairman Sidney
Efronson, J. C. Shaw and Carl Paden to study this matter and
report at the next regular meeting of the Board.
****
Mr. Bowman stated being on the Planning and Zoning Board
is a new experience, an enric;lment for him and he will enjoy
working with this group.
****
Mr. Keys asked that notices of public hearing be sent to
the Board members when the signs are posted, that this request
had been made before. He receives calls from interested persons
and is not informed on ·the subject at that time.
There being no further business before the Board, meeting
adjourned at 10:25 p.m., upon motion duly made, properly seconded,
and carried.
5 11-12-63
Present:
****
MI~uTES CF TEE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
NOVEMBER 19, 1963 AT CITY HALL, 7:30 p.m.
Jack Stanton, Chairman
John Brau, Vice Chairman
James Bowman
Sidney Efronson
Thomas T. Foster
C. R. Gibbs
Myron Keys
Carl Paden
J. C. Shaw
Edward C. Vining, Jr.
Harold Yakely
The Chairman called the special meeting to order at
7:30 p.m., for the consideration of American Cancer Society's
application, for a variance to permit a Thrift Shop at 5850
Sunset Drive.
After a Silort discussion and consultation with the City
Attorney, a motion was made and seconded that the Planning and
Zoning Board recommend to the City Council, a non-transferrable
Special Use Permit be granted subject to revocation at any time
without notice.
Polled: Yes, 10; No, 1
Meeting adjourned at 7:50 p.m., upon motion duly made,
properly seconded and carried.
"c~c
Present:
****
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
NOVEMBER 26, 1963 AT CITY HALL, 8:00 p.m.
Jack Stanton, Cahirman
John Brau, Vice Chairman
James Bowman
Sidney Efronson
Thomas T. Foster
C. R. Gibbs
Myron Keys
Carl Paden
J. C. Shaw
Edward C. Vining, Jr.
Harold Yakely
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Gibbs, moved that the minutes
of the regular meeting of November 12, and the special meeting
of November 19, 1963 be adopted as individually read. Motion
carried unanimously.
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the
application of Robert J. English, agent for Anthony & Goldberg.
for a variance to permit the construction of an apartment at
approximately 4081 SW 65 Avenue in Section 24-54-40.
The Chairman read two letters of objection from R. F. Cook,
Director of Metropolitan Building and Zoning Department, and
Roscoe H. Jones, Director of Metropolitan Planning Department.
No other letters of objection were received and no objectors
present.
Mr. English spoke in behalf of his application and Mr.
Hqold Fitzpatrick of 4117 SW 65 Avenue said he had nb objection
if they would provide a fence around the South side of the property.
After a short discussion Mr. Vining, seconded by Mr. Paden.
moved that the Planning and Zoning Board recommend to the City
Council that the application be granted for frontage and square
footage. but that the setback requirement for a pool be denied.
Motion carried unanimously.
****
The Chairman read t;,e notice of public hearing on the
application of Monroe Dixon. agent for Thomas Jardine, owner of
11/26/63
Lots 24, 25 and 26 in Block I, \llesterfield Manor, Sec. 3 PB
27/9 to permit parking for bank to be constructed on Lots 1
thru 5, Block 1, Westerfield Manor Sec. PB 27/9.
The Chairman read a le"tter of objection from R. F. Cook,
Director of Metropolitan Building and Zoning Department. also
a letter from Harold P. Jones who does not object if there
would be no ingress or egress on SW 41 Street, and a screen
erected along the South boundary, as his property is directly
across the street.
Mr. Monroe Dixon and Robert Shrum spoke in behalf of the
application; stated they would have a louvre fence, also re-
paving all around the property and sidewalks around the entire
area.
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Efronson, moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council the application
on the described property be granted provided that there be a
5 foot concrete louvre fence on the Southerly side of Lot 4 and
Lot 5 and the Easterly side of Lot 24, and further that there be
a hedge of similar height along the said louvre fence.
Mr. Foster, seconded by Mr. Keys, made amendment to the
motion, that the Southern portion of Lots 24, 25 and 26 have
no ingress or egress along 51i 41 Street.
Polled on the amendment: Yes, 7; No, 4.
Polled on the motion as amended: Yes, 11, No, O.
****
The Chairman, after checking with the City Attorney stated
there would not be a public hearing on the application of
Dal-Long, Inc., as the legal description in the notice of public
hearing was incomplete. and the following motion was made.
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Vining, moved that the Building
and Zoning Department be instructed that the Dal-Long Inc.,
notice of public hearing be re-issued to include the entire
legal description and further that be a hearing before this
Board without further charge to the petitioners. Motion carried
unanimously.
****
Mr. Vining questioned the reading of letters of objection
or any letters pertaining to the public hearings in open session.
The Chairman with the Board's approval advised the letters
will be a record of file, open to the public, and hereafter will
be read in executive session. 2 11/26/63
".
****
Mr. Paden inquired if the Planning and Zoning Board had
received notification regarding the Rendezvous Lounge at
6501 Bird Road. Mr. Paden inquired of Dade County Building
and Zoning Department and assistant director advised that
notice had been mailed to Mr. Gammage at City Hall. That
this Lounge in the County is within 180 feet of the City.
No members of the Board had received notification.
The Chairman with the Board's approval asked the Clerk to
have mimeograph sheets made for the names, etc., of people
appearing before the Board for their signatures. These slips
to be filed with the minutes of each hearing by the Clerk.
****
There being no further business before the Board, meeting
adjourned at 9:45 p.m., upon motion properly made, seconded and
carried.
• r
Present:
****
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
DECEMBER 10, 1963, AT CITY HALL, 8:00 p.m.
Jack Stanton, Chairman
John Brau, Vice Chairman
James Bowman
Sidney Efronson
Thomas T. Foster
C. R. Gibbs
Myron Keys
Carl Paden
J. C. Shaw"
Edward C. Vining, Jr.
Harold Yakely
Mr. Gibbs, seconded by Mr. Efronson, moved that the minutes
of the regular meeting of November 26, 1963 be adopted as
individually read. Motion carried unanimously.
****
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the
application of Torn Fossey, agent for Robert Sykes, for a change
of zoning to allow Garden-type apartments, at NE corner of SW 80
Street and SW 69 Avenue, present zoning Ru-l; proposed RU-4.
Mr. Fossuy, Dr. Sykes and Mrs. Stratt, commenting this land
was acquired and with approval of Health Department of Dade
County built a convalescent horne, the zoning being RU-3. In 1957
under Metro regulations this horne became inoperable. This pro-
posed Garden-type Apt.will be for adults and Dr. Sykes will agree
to a variance for apartment building.
Mr. Gardner, Dr. Carl Snyder and Mr. Geisler spoke in objec-
tion to the proposed Garden--type Apt .as objecting to any change
in zoning. A show of hands of 12 people in objection, however
all 12 people also with a S,10W of hands had purchased their
property when subject property was county zoned RU-3. Letter of
objection was also received from Vernon Jennings at the meeting.
Mr. Vining, seconded by Mr. Efronson, moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the applica-
tion as Special Use Permit or Variance for apartments only, and
all other RU-4 requirements be met.
12-10-63
r
Mr. Shaw, seconded by Mr. Vining, moved an amendment that
a protecting wall be required on land lying at 69 Avenue, the
vacant strip at 64 Street and the rear at 80 Street.
****
Polled on the amendment: Yes, 2; No, 9
Polled on the motion: Yes, 10; No, 1
The Chairman read the notice of public hearing on the appli-
cation of Everett E. Butler, Jr., agent for Albert L. Buzzell,
owner of E 55' of S 91' of Tract 2, and W 165' of Tract 2,
Larkins Forrest, PB 33/14, and Lot 22 Larkins Forrest PB 18/33
for the rezoning of the S~ of Tract 2 to allow the construction
of an apartment house. Location approx. 5761 SW 74 Terrace.
Mr. Brau requested and was granted permission to be excused
from this portion of hearing of the Planning and Zoning Board.
Mr. Delany spoke in behalf of the application stating the
logical plan and appears to be consistent with the City's
existing pattern. This will act as a buffer between commercial
and residential property. Mr. Buzzell stated he would appreciate
the Board's consideration. Mr. Butler in behalf of the applica-
tion stated on the South side there would be 25' from the property
line. and 35' from the pavement. No doors on the front of the
building. one parking space for each unit. Letters ·from Mrs.
B. S. Chinn and Mrs. Agnes Ruhl in favor of the application.
Mr. Brau appeared before the Board in objection to the
application being granted asked that if the Board does not
consider RU-2 as a buffer that the Board consider RU-5 as a
buffer. He was aware of the commercial zoning on 74 Street,
and the RU-l zoning south of 74 Street, however he believes the
owner could develope his C-I property which would be less objection-
able. Letters of objection were recei·ved from Mrs. Marian Lee,
Mr. and Mrs. James Stewart and Mr. and Mrs. Luther Shafer.
Mr. Vining, seconded by Mr. Gibbs, moved that the Planning
and-~oning Board reccrrmcnd tothc City Council that a Variance
or Special Use Permit be granted instead of rezoning, to allow
the construction of an apartment house in accordance with the
plan submitted and made a part of the record. Polled: Yes 9;
No, 1; Mr. Brau had been excused from the meeting and was not
in the Council chamber during this portion of the meeting.
2 12-10-63
****
The Chairman read tbe notice of public hearing on the appli-
cation of Frank L. Klebba, agent for Fonnie L. Sullivan, owner
of the W 834.06' of SE\ lying South of the R/W line of Snapper
Creek Canal, less the West 200' thereof, consisting of 3.64 A,
more or less and being in Section 36-54-40, for a change of zoning
to allow the construction of an apartment house. Location 6101
North Kendall Drive; present zoning RU-IA, proposed; RU-4.
Mr. Klebba spoke in behalf of his application stated an
adjoining 200' by over 300' depth has been acquired since the
application was filed and this additional land will be combined
with the land stated on his application. This request is for
88 apartments, garden type, no parking will be visible from the
street and a wall for screening. These will be 2-story apart-
ments. Dr. Joseph Sullivan also spoke in behalf of the appli-
cation stated there is no property in South Miami directly
adjacent to this property with the exception of the property to
the East, on the North a Jewish Synagogue, on the West is the
County line and people on the other side do not object to the
application being granted, and the property on the East now have
their property up for rezoning.
The following objectors were heard: Dave Popper, Gene
Essner and Frank Rotolante, that the County has proposed for
long range planning this area as an estate area including the
property for this rezoning. To change the zoning there is a
requirement showing the change would be a benefit to the community.
There has been no change of circumstances from a prior applica-
tion that was denied. This would increase the pollution problem
and a sewage problem. Sixteen petitions with a total of 280
names in objection were received. However, public notices for
the 300' radius were sent to 14 people. R. Jones Dade Co. objected.
Mr. Keys, seconded by Mr. Shaw, moved ti1at the Planning and
Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that the application
be approved. Polled: Yes, 6; No, 5.
****
The Chairman appointed the following committee for the
interim zoing on Parcels known as #3 and #4: John Brau, Chairman,
C. R. Gibbs and Tom Foster. Report to be submitted to the Board
at the next regular mee-ting.
****
Mr. Brau was appointed as a committee to submit a formal
recommendation to the Board regarding khe numbering of hearings;
decisions etc.
3 12-10-63
****
Mr. Keys asked Mr. Bach to bring to the attention of the
Public Works department, the sanitation problem at Kwik Chek
store, garbage being strewn around on Sundays all thru the
area. Also the problem of the incineration, for which they
have a permit according to Mr. Back.
****
Information was given the Board the City Manager reported
to the Police Department the problem of the parking situation
on 76 Street and 59 Avenue.
****
Mr. Paden spoke in connection with the number of parking
spaces for these apartment houses. The County is now requiring
l~ space for each unit, however it is felt we should have l~
spaces for each unit, and Mr. Paden was requested to put this
into a formal recommendation to the City Council, said recom-
mendation be made available at the next regular meeting of the
Board.
****
Mr. Shaw spoke on petitions that we weigh the positions
of tile street address in relation to the subject property, and
the residents of South Miami area.
****
There being no further business before the Boa,.d, meeting
adjourned at 10:30 p.m., upon motion duly made, properly
seconded and carried.
L1. 12-10-63
-........... ~~~ ...... --I:.I:--.. ----
Mr. Keys , Chairman, submitted the following report:
It is recommended by the Comm i ttee that the Planning
and Zon i ng Board recommend to the City Council that
they enact an ordinance i n reference to Section 20-22,
paragraph 1, a nd Section 20 -22.1 , setting forth that
every use permitted in the preceding RU zoning be
permitted in C-l zoning.
Mr . Keys, seconded by Mr. Vini ng, moved t :,at the report of the
committee be adopted by the Board. Polled: Yes , 10, Abstained 1
* * * * * * * * * * * * o Mr . Foster , seconded by Mr . Brau, moved that the P lanning and
Zoning Board request the City Council to direct the City
----
Manager to inve stigate the enforcement of the sign ordinance,
particularly in cases of non -conforming signs, where no bu ild -
ing permit has been issued; also the possibility of using
police patro l cars to check the proper display of bui l ding
permits at the sites during sign construction. Po lled : Yes, 11 .
* * * * * * * * * * * *
May 28, 1 963
Mr. F oster, seconded by Mr . Hardeman, moved that the Planning
and Zoning Board r ecommend t o the Ci ty Council that the Zon in g
Ordinance be amended to require that the lot frontage require-
ment be measured at the zoned building l ine, rather than at
front property line. This wou l d insure fair spacing of houses
in area where the sid e property l ines are not para llel.
Polled: Yes, 11 ; No, O.
Mr. Foster, seconded by Mr . Brau, moved that the P lanning and
Zoning Board recommend to the City Council that an ordinance
be drawn and passed, requiring sidewalks, curbs and gut~ers, on
all properties t hat are deve l oped as RU-4 sites. This wou l d
apply to apartment houses t .l at a re constructed afte r the
adoption of the ordi nance by variance or special use permits or .
on property zoned RU -~. ¥rr. Keys, seconded by Mr . Brau, moved
to amend the motion to include RU-3 and RU-4B. Pol l ed on
amendment: Yes, 9, No, O . Polled on motion as amended:
Yes, 8; No, 1 .
* * * * * * * * * * * *
June 11, 1 963
Mr. Brau, seconded by Mr. Keys, moved that in c l a rification of the
matter of Amer ican Townsites and that area bounded by 5 9 Avenue
on the East, 62 Avenue on the West , 7 6 Street on ·the South, and
US #1 Highway on Northwest , it be so noted t hat the Board out
of committee, recommends to the City Council that the zoning
rema i n as is. Polled : Yes , 6; No, 1 ; Absta i ned , 1 .