Loading...
Ord. No. 15-85-1231ORDINANCE NO.15-85-1231 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,FLORIDA, GRANTING AVARIANCETO ALLOW ALOT FRONTAGE OF' 93.35'WHERE 100'IS NORMALLY REQUIRED TO ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN ASTO CERTAIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY LOCATED AT LOTS 12,13,14AND15 FRONTING ON SOUTHWEST 61ST COURTANDON SOUTHWEST 62ND AVENUE NORTH OF SUNSET DRIVE:AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS: LOTS 12,13,14AND 15;BLOCK 1,LARWIN CENTER SUBDIVISION,AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK27AT PAGE 67 OFTHE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY,FLORIDA. WHEREAS,the Planning Board of the City of South Miami,has recommended approval of the requested variance herein;and WHEREAS,Staffof the City of South Miami has recommended approval of the requested variance herein; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BYTHEMAYORANDTHE CITY COMMISSION OFTHECITYOFSOUTH MIAMI,FLORIDA: Section 1.That a 'variance for a lot frontage of 93.35'where 100'is normally required be and is hereby granted to Architectural Design as to certain described property located at Lots 12,13,14 and 15 fronting on S.W.61st Court:and on S.W.62nd Avenue North of Sunset Drive,and legally described as: Lots 12,13,14,and 15;Block 1, LARKIN CENTER SUBDIVISION,as recorded in Plat Book 27 at Page 67of the Public Records of Dade County,Florida. Section 2.This ordinance shall take effect immediately at the time of its passage. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of June ,1985. ATTEST: CITY CLERK READ AND-APPROVED ASTOFORM: Passed on lsi:Reading:5/21/85 Passed on2nd Reading:6/04/85 APPROVED: \J C.Hearing#85-06 Request: Location: Legal Description: MOTION: MOTION CARRIED. MINUTES PLANNING BOARD CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI APRIL 30,1985 Architectural Design Variance to allow alot frontage of 93.35 feet where 100 feet is normally requried. Lots 12,13,14and15 fronting onS.W61Ct andonS.W62Ave,NorthofSunset Drive. Lots 12,13,14and 15;Block 1;Larkin Center Subdivision,PB 27 Section 25,Twp. 54,Rge 40. Chairman Smith opened the Public Hearing. Mr.Ray Feito addressed the Board representing the owner,Agudo Real Estate Partnership andas the architect for the project. In response to the Board,staff recommended approval stating that there is 50%more square footage to build upon than required by Code. Mr.Feito presented a scale model of the desired building and stated they can't build unless they get a variance on the frontage requirement since they are unahle to purchase more land adjacent to their property. Mr.Michelson questioned the depth of underground garages.In response, Diana Wheeler informed the Board thatthis particular building doesn't haveanymorethanaone basement level. Since there was no one else wishing to speak,Chairman Smith declared the Public Hearing closed. By Bernard Michelson to approve Seconded by Lee Perry Vote Yes 5 No 0 * REQUEST: LOCATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: CITY COMMISSION HEARING: City of South Miami PLANNING BOARD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING HEARING: DATE: TIME: APPLICANT: ,f 85-06 April 30,1985 7:30 P.M. Architectural Design Variance to allow a lot frontage of 93.35 feet where 100 feet is normally required. Lots 12,13,14 and 15 fronting on S.W.61 Court and on S.W.62 Avenue North of Sunset Drive. Lots 12,13,14 and 15;Block 1;Larkin Center Subdivision,PB 27 Sec.25,Twp. 54,Rge.40. May 21,1985 7:30 P.M. South Miami City Hall 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami,Florida YOU ARE HEREBY ADVISED THAT IF ANY PERSON DESIRES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING OR HEARING,Sll(II PERSON wil l ni ID A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS,AND FOR SUCH PURPOSE MAY NEED TO ENSURE IMAI AVI RBATIM RECORD OF THE PRO CEEDINGS IS MADE,WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL. IS TO BE BASED.(F.S.206.0103) PUBLICHEARING WILL.BEHELD IN THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS AT "I 11E CITY HALL,6130 SUNSETDRIVE,SOUTH MIAMI.FLORIDA,AT THE TIME AND DATE STATED ABOVE. ALL INTERESTED PARTIES ARE URGED TO ATTEND.OBJECTIONS OR EXPRESSIONS OF APPHOVAl MAY liL MADE IN PERSON AT THE HEARING OR FILED IN WRITING PRIOR TOORATTHE HEARING.THE BOARD RESERVES THE RIGHT TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COMMISSION WHATEVER THE BOARD CONSIDERS INTHE BEST INTEREST FOR THE AREA INVOLVED.THE BOARD'S RECOMMENDATION ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE CITY COMMISSION AT AFUTURE DATE.INTERESTED PARTIES REQUESTING INFORMATION ARE ASKEDTOCONTACTTHE OFFICE OFTHE ZONING DIRECTOR BY CALLING 667-5691 OR BY WRITING.REFER TO HEARING NUMBER WHEN MAKING INQUIRY. PSBI00-7 BZ REV.12-9—81 THIS ' Ronald Smith Chairman PLANNING BOARD COURTESY NOTICE PUBLI C SERVI CE DEPARTMENT 6130 SUNSET DRIVE,SOUTH MIAMI,FLORIDA 33143 HEARING #85-06 ZONING PETITION Property Description,Location and Legal:Lots 12,13,14 and 15;Block 1, fronting on S.W.61 Court and on S.W.62 Avenue in the block North of Sunset Drive. Lots 12,13,14,15;Block 1;Larkin Center Subdivision,PB 27; Section 25,TWP 54,RGE.40. Request:TheOwners of the above property have made the following request: Variance to allow a lot fontage of 93.35 feet where 100 feet is normally required. Petition:We,the undersigned property owners,are within 300 feet of the above property.We understand and approve the above request. NAME 7 .;/-r ~--f j •>,r~''/J c> ~""""-'Hl A -3 s- 6&ST.inrirt <,,-,,ii.»u DATE ../•6 S v" iO-37 (continued on page 2) ADDRESS 4-Sjjimj •:/'/< £jj)_&3Q>/i^*?7_>z. £>2/Ql?&l 7o/H£r-—i?ite 'Gray ~^*r Page 1 APPLICANT:Architectural Design Raymundo Feito :Vivanco,Agudo Real Estate Partnership UNIVERSITY TRACT / "•"":.:;CK:Lots 12,13,14,15;Block 1,Larkin Center Subdivision. Variance to allow a lot frontage of 93.35 feet where 100 feet is normally required CITY©*SOUTU MIAMI-PLANNING IbOfc GA 9D£NS NO2 TRACT 8 69 +* \n V.if -0 lo tt- JJ r* IS lb r i 4* n 'S If 10 ii J» H t* lb 11 Compass Scale..300=1."..•. Date.A/5/85 Drn Chk ..PS Hearing No #8.57.06, V STAFF RECOMMENDATION Hearing #85-06 Architectural Design Request:Variance to allow a lot frontage of 93.35 feet where 100 feet is normally required. Staff Recommends approval. With the exception of lot frontage,this site is suitable for construction. In fact,the applicant's property has over fifty percent more square foot age than is required by code. Since adjacent lots are already built or have anticipated development, assemblage of property to increase lot frontage is not an available option. Moreover,if a larger parcel could be assembled,it would undoubtedly result in a larger building. Without a waiver of the lot frontage requirement,this parcel is unbuildable and will remain vacant.Staff suggests that the need for office space is best absorbed on infill sites in completely commercial areas adjacent to non-residential roadways.