Loading...
131 Ordinance No. ____ _ 2 3 An Ordinance amending Section 15-93, titled "Noise-creating blowers, power fans, or 4 internal combustion enginesB, re-titling the ordinance, increasing its scope, defining 5 ~f!"lliisiSand establishine penalties. 6 7 WHEREAS, City residents are entitled to peace and quiet at night and on the weekends and 8 holidays; and 9 10 WHEREAS, the use of loud, mechanized yard maintenance equipment has the potential to 11 interrupt sleep and enjoyment of one's yard, and 12 13 WHEREAS, residents who work may have no other time except weekends to take care of their 14 yards; and 15 16 WHEREAS, certain commercial grade equipment is often larger and louder than consumer grade 17 equipment, even when the engines are properly muffled; and 1.8 19 WHEREAS, mechanized leaf blowers have been shown to cause respiratory problems by blowing 20 dust and mold particles into the air, and 21 22 WHEREAS, mechanized leaf blowers make particularly annoying and penetrating sounds; and 23 24 WHEREAS, no economic harm to lawn services has been demonstrated in communities where 25 leaf blowers have been banned outright. 26 27 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION 28 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: 29 30 Section 1. The City of South Miami's Code of Ordinances, Chapter 15, Article ill, Section 31 15-93 shall be amended and shall read as follows: 32 33 Sec. 15-93. -Noise-creating bl_eps, lI_eF fans, 6F intemal eombustion engines tools, 34 machinery and eguipment. 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 = =< ""----,--_._"-."-.- L _. " .oJ , . , 'n . ~c no, "_v UJ , " :-;-;;: rt:::- \:he EitP" Sf flight:! , "" n .. v:-; ~/". '., , , . ,. ,.,., . -" 'r . , ,.V .""~L 'C LV -, --.--; --,- Page 1 of4 ' .' -;.~,." .. ~~ LV _c .... _;:' .- ~. 'LV '" _L ,,," -, ., , ." " _c '1' L LV C. ~~ "c. v-; . , , .< ~n A ., .... j _C LL _. =-:> ,. ~ ., L _. i 13 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 :g? : ::'~ . ........ i I~- -•• L· ~t is unlawful to operate. or cause to be operated. any liow:e!e~ yard maintenance equipment including lawn mowers. lawn edgers. weed trimmers. leaf blowers. chain saws. chippers. stump grinders. pressure washers. compressors. out-of-doors except as provided below: (I) Commercial operations are only permitted on weekdays from 8:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m. and on Saturdays after 9 am and until 2 pm. No operations are permitted at any time on Sundays and any legal holidays. (2) Non-commercial operations are only permitted on weekdays from 8:00 a.m. until 30 minutes after sunset and on Saturdays. Sundays and any legal holiday from 9:00 a.m. until 30 minutes after sunset. " ". Hi)) Equipment used under an emergency condition is exempt from this ordinance. if the City Manager determines that an emergency required the use of the equipment. Page 2 of4 102 103 fSjJ) It shall be unlawful, to use. or cause to be operated. any equipment that in any way 104 causes Bustoroihe~ particulate matter. to blow or drift into an inhabited structure or ffiere than 105 five (5) feet onto or over another residential property. 106 107 ~)It shall be the responsibilitv of the owner or occupant. as well as their agent. who bires 108 another person to perform any work on their property to insure that the person hired. including 109 that person's employees and subcontractors. does not violate this ordinance. 110 111 Wl'd)The term "cause to be operated". as used in this ordinance. shall include the act of hiring 112 someone who violates this ordinance. whether the hiring is done by the owner. occupier or by 113 their agent. The occupier of the property shall be deemed the agent of the owner for the 114 purposes of this ordinance. 115 116 me)The City Manager or the manager's designee. or any City Code Enforcement Officer. 117 shall issue a written warning to the person or persons who have violated this ordinance. 118 including the operator and the hirer of the operator liS well asl the owner of the property ifheor 119 she is different from the Derson who Dersonallv hired the ooerator of the eauipment However 1 • "'" .m "",_., __ • ____ __ -,_ -_" 'j 120 121 122 123 notwithstanding: the fact that one or more of the violators may not have received a writte~' :Warning:. nothing: contained herein shall Drevent the Drosecution of the violators who hav( received a written wa.rniflg:. The written warning: mav be served bv hand deliverv~ bv certified eturn receiRt mail or any other method that Rrovides evidence of deliverv.l The word ----------- 124 "operator". as used 10 thiS ordlOance. shall mean the owner of the entity or the sole proprietor of 125 the business that is hired and that conducted the offense. The employee of the operator is 126 exempt from the penalties of this section unless the employee is also the owner of or has any 127 flOancial interest in the business. 128 129 iilf)All persons who continue to violate this ordinance after receiving a written warning shall 130 be punished by the imposition. on each violator. of a fine in the amount of $250 for the first 131 offense and $500 for each succeeding offense. A succeeding offence include any activity that 132 violates this ordinance in any way. whether it is the same type of offence or a different offences 133 in violation of this ordinance. 134 135 136 Section 2. Codification. The provisions of this ordinance shall become and be made part ofthe 137 Code of Ordinances of the City of South Miami as amended; that the sections of this ordinance may be 138 renumbered or re-Iettered to accomplish such intention; and that the word "ordinance" may be changed to 139 "section" or other appropriate word. 140 141 Section 3. Severability. If any section, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance is for any 142 reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, this holding shall not affect the 143 validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. 144 145 Section 4. Ordinances in Conflict. All ordinances or parts of ordinances and all sections and 146 parts of sections of ordinances in direct conflict herewith are hereby repealed. However, it is not the intent 147 of this section to repeal entire ordinances, or parts of ordinances, that give the appearance of being in 148 conflict when the two ordinances can be harmonized or when only a portion of the ordinance in conflict 149 needs to be repealed to harmonize the ordinances. If the ordinance in conflict can be harmonized by 150 amending its terms, it is hereby amended to harmonize the two ordinances. Therefore, only that portion 151 that needs to be repealed to harmonize the two ordinances shall be repealed. 152 Page 3 of4 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective upon enactment. PASSED AND ENACTED this __ day of , 2015. ATTEST: APPROVED: CITY CLERK MAYOR 1st Reading 2nd Reading READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: LANGUAGE, LEGALITY AND EXECUTION THEREOF CITY ATTORNEY COMMISSION VOTE: Mayor Stoddard: Vice Mayor Liebman: Commissioner Edmond: Commissioner Harris: Commissioner Welsh: Page 4 of4 MIAMI DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays Miami, Miami·Dade County, Florida STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE; Before the undersigned authority personally appeared MARIA MESA, who on oath says that he or she is the LEGAL CLERK, Legal Notices of the Miami Daily Business Review flk/a Miami _Review, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday am;! Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami in Miami~Dade County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, . being a Legal Advertisement of Notice in the matter of CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 4/21/2015 in the XXXX Court, was published in said newspaper in the issues of 04/10/2015 Affiant further says that the said Miami Daily Business Review is a'newspaper published at Miami in said Miami-Dade County; Florida and that the sald newspaper has heretofore peen contin~ously published in said Miami-Dade County, Florida, each day (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Miami in said Miami-Dade County, Florida, for a' period of one year next preceding the first publication of the- attached copy of advertisement; and qffiant further says that he or she' has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, r~bate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publlcatton In the said news~? Sworn to and subscribed before' me this "~'~" (SEAL) MARIA MESA personally known to me o. V. FERBEYRE· NOlary PubOc -Stale 01 Florida My Comm, Expires Ju19, 2018 Commission II FF 102821 COURTS Vuitton v. Swap Shop case goes to trial BY PAULA "'CMAHON Sun Sentinel "If you were playing p:>-"[Heno] is worth pmba· ket; would you let someone bly close to tlm!e-quarters see your hand while you're ota billion dollars:' Schafer still p1aying?" Henn said. told U.s.-District Judge WiJ.· flea markets and drive-in tionisnotsuffimnganyciam' movie theaters in Lauder· age or brand confusion be- hill, Lake worth and Thmpa. cause of a Jew such alleged The Henns worklong hours sales, the defense argues. at the SWap Shop, monitor Thedesigneritemsarele· gallysold -new-onlyat Louis Vuitton stores, the company's online store and some upscale department stores. Coming Monday to a South Florida courttoom: A battle lIJ)'!Il between hur:ury brandLouis Vuittonand the Swap Shop tIeo.marketover designer knocltotrs. Preston Henn might have thought the .lil.shlon indust· rywas donewithhimabout a year ago when he settled similar allegations byCoac:h fur $5.5million -an amount the eccentric: Swap Shop owner caned ~pocket change" at the time. Reno could be playing a liam Zloch in court. "This risky hand. If jurors side isn't some mom-and·pop with louis Vuitton, Henn operation." might have to pay da.mBges Henn wouldn:t put an es· between $1.,000 and $2 mil· timate on his personal lion for each proven trade-wealth. the 88'acre propertyvia se· ~~~~~~;::::::~~~;iii;=1 curity cameras andpatrolit by golf cart. The lawsuit concerns Louis Vuitton fakes sold only at the Lauderhill prop- erty, which bas more than 1,000 spaces for traders, al4- screen drive-in, fuod court, lUIlusementrides,paidpark- ing and Henn's impressive race car collection. This time, Henn vaws he will fight the expensive French designer brand's claims aga.!wt him, his wife Betty and their iconic busi- ness on Sunrise Boulevard in Lauderhill. Louis Vuitton is seeldng millions of dollars inthefed.· era! civil lawsuit, alleging that the Henns contributed to the counterfeiting ofils trademark designs and products by continuing to lease space to flea market tenants they knew, Dr should have known, were selling fake Louis Vuitton items. Henn, 84, told the Sun Sentinel he xegrets settling the Coach lawsuit in De· cember 2013 after just two days of testimony and said he plans to fight the Louis Vuitton case all the way, though he won't reveal trial strategy. mark violation. ''They CAn say anything Legal experts say each. they want to:' Henn said. suitcase, handbag Dr w:tllet "My wife and I work seven could count for several via-days a week and it's almost lations. The design on the 'JAil." leather or .lil.bric, the label, If Louis Vuitton wins, theclaspandotherpartscan Scharer told the trial judge each count as a separate he will seekhefty damages, breach and the pen.elties can partly because Henn char- swifI:1y add up. acteri%edhis $S,smi1lion set· LouIs Vuitton has not tlement with Coach as specified how many passi· ''pocket change" inaninter· ble trademark violations it view with the Sun Sentinel. alleges took place in the ''It's going to take a heck fOUl'year period covered by of a lot more than that to de- the lawsuit. The luxury ter Mr. Renn," Schafer said. brand sells luggage, hand-Schafer 3l1;Ul!S that Heno bags, wallets, clothing and and his wife deliberately other items for hundreds turned a blind eye to the sale and thousands of dollars offakedesignergoodsatthe apiece. flea market. Their motive, The case will be dosely Schafer says, was to make watched by other fashion more money. and. luxury brands because Several law enfu:n::ement it is so unusual for these raids, many arrests and Ie- kinds ofcontributorytmde-peated notifications from mark lawsuits to make it to Louis 1ruitton and other de- trial. Defendants usually signer brands mean the settle because the stakes are Henns ha:ve \0IIg been aware so bigh,legal experts said. their flea market is well Louis Vuitton's lead trial !mown as "the place to go if lawyer Harry Schafer said one is looking to purchase he plans to make HeIllts sig· COUIlterfeit items:' accoxding nificant personal wealth a to the Louis Vuittonlawsuit. feature of the trial. Heno's empire includes FRED GRIMM I IN MY OPINION Louis Vuitton estimated in court records that the Lauderhill property alone "is a multimillion dollar is worth an Scott could take reform lessons from Georgia • GR.IMM, FR.OM 18 Hewas outraged by what he found. ''If one of your ldds ed prison education pro-were kept in such circum· grams. The famously con-stances, you'd be up there servative governor has with rifles," Ki.rk SlIid. pushed through programs Scott ought to try an un· aimed at reducing the nurn-announced visit to a Florida ber of juveniles and adult prison.Hemighthaveasim· ."" .. "' .. l .. .,"' ...... ,,,.,,ffA ... " .. ""----_ih."-, ..... ..JAtinn. _ CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI COURT.ESY NOTICE accountability. IfScotthad asudden urge to demonsttate leadership, he could convince state rep. resentatives to support amendments that would NonCE IS UERt:BY given tllllt Ille City Commission of the Cil}' of South Miami. Florida will conduct l'uhlic Healing(sl at it~ regular City Cru:nmiision IT!eeting schedul.ed f,ar nit"'"" Andlll 11115 beginnln& nt1:00 I~m .. illlh. CityC:onunission ChlUllhcrlj. 6130 SIIQSCI Dove, 10 oons"k:r!h~ fullowmg,fcrn(s); A R!l.oolution aullwrizing tho City M.l1/Ig~'T I~ CflI<'Tinlll a ,me ~car ,'(mttat1 c~t"llSioa with Alfiu EI~'<tmOj~5. A RIl,101Ulion amonding t.heCityofSoutb Mi.mj·Pny Plan. An Orclina= ~cudi!l,!lA\iicle n, Scclion5·7-S-11 Orlne Cit)'ofSlJlllh Ml'\ll1i'~ CodeofOrdirulllc.sand loenae! Settlon 5-1 I to regulate dogs nnd 10 require thl: remaval of dog wasle, defining the often!c;md <!S1.bli>lring pCn.1I~c$. ( . Atl.0dinlUlcc lI!l'""di"j:: SeeMn .15-93. lili"" "Noise""'reIIlmg hlllllcrs, !l'lW .. f.n~. or inli.'mJIi tmIlhulti'm cogi/lCY"') re·lliling Ire Oldll!'''''''', lutfl'asing)(. 'C<1pe, d~finmg ofl'eru;.~ nnd e~tabll;l)..ng pl'!lal:ieo;. An Ordinanre amending So-ctiou 204.2 "fthe City"fSoutn Miami's Lamll:levclopnlmtCotle 10 add. dorify andIormodify criteria for the City'iJ 3pprQl.'il1 of~ \\'!I1vor of pial, and f1rappro\'ill of all platl arre-plan r"'luiring !Ijlprowl by Miami.D3de County ami adding <1efinilioR~ for ntJdwaj'li in SoClion 20·2..3. ALL inKorested parti~s arc inYitedt(J iltfl:ml anclwill 00 hcar~. r-C1r furllter information, please conlact the City Clerk's Ollice al: ](i5-663-6340. Maria M. Mem:mk:J', (NC Citya~'tk I'urw3nI [0 I-1<'T,da S~tc., 286.f)JU5. 'ho eny h<-Teby advl,ollllo pl'blio thAI ih r=ml de"dos In "£lIIoal MY dod,i"" made Ir; ~,;. n~.m.Ag ... cy '" CommL,';on with "'-"Poet'~ any n"'I<c,c"",;<kn:d" it<m."~ng ~r hearinB' he: or .ho will ~.c:d. =0,<1 Mlbo prncet!di"G~. and tl'M fur ""eh P"'P""", "U't'"le<!p""",u "'-"y " ... d '" ~u>ure ,ha' " , .. ,ba,i", RC'olnl of the pru<:!!eiliogsismod. "iIi,*, ",cord in<luJ., the te>~mOl1Y ""dooi<ienc. "pon "i,ir.h the "I'peaj i, ",!;e ha.<ed. ., , ~O~,~,,},.riri'.r'·~'":" ~?::I~,~ I" I !iIi 'Iif T