4TilE CITY Of PLEASANT LlVINC
To:
FROM:
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
The Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Commission
, Steven Alexander, City Manager (if Christopher Brimo AICP, Planning Director .
December 2,2014 Agenda Item NO.:_-5-
Thru:
DATE:
SUBIECT:
A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of South Miami, relating to an appeal of a
decision of the Environmental Review and Preservation Board regarding the denial of a sign age
installation located at 5740 Sunset Drive.
BACKGROUND:
The original application [ERPB-14-006] for sign age review was filed by the applicant in January
2014. On February 4,2014, the Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB), reviewed
the signage request by AAA On Time Electric (the applicant) to install a sign that was proposed
to be mounted above the entrance on the fascia leading into the business and on the projecting
storefront for RAZZLEDAZZlE Barber Shop, located at 5740 Sunset Drive (Figures 1, & 2). The
proposed illuminated flat sign would consist of reverse channel letters that will read
"RAZZlEDAZZlE" on the first line and "BARBERSHOP" just below. The proposed sign was
intended to be flush mounted to the building and consist of a combination of black letters with
a red outline, detailing the colors of the company.
Figure 1.
14"RAZZLEDAZZLE 12"
12' 1/2
12"BARBER SHOP 10"
10' ~"-."" .. "-~ .. "" .. ".
CB Z:\Commission Items\2014\12-02-14\ERPB Sign Appeal_5740 Sunset Dr\ERPB-14-006 Appeal_CM reportdocx
ERPB-14-006 Appeal
December 2,2014
Page 2 of 6
The sign had a combined height twenty-six (26) inches, a maximum length of 12'-1/2", and a
sign area of approximately 27.08 square feet. Following a staff review of the proposed sign, it
was found that it did not exceed 20% of the area allowed for any building face (32.4 S.F.) and
was less than two hundred (200) square feet in area.
The applicant also proposed to install a traditional barber pole on the exterior of the storefront.
located at the far right of the establishment, the proposed barber pole would be mounted to
the black aluminum storefront via screws at a height of eighty-four (84) inches above the
sidewalk, and extend out from the building approximately ten (10) inches. When reviewed, it
was found that the height of the proposed barber pole complied with the regulations listed in
Section 20-3.3(E)(11) which states that non-stationary elements shall have a minimum clearance
of seven (7) feet above the sidewalk. Figure 3 shows a comparison of signage for the business
just west of the subject location, at the end of the block.
At that meeting, the Board felt that the sign was too large, overlapped adjacent businesses, and
was out of scale due to the rendering that was provided. Also, the barber pole should be
moved closer to the entrance. Because of this, the Board deferred the item with the condition
that the applicant provides the Board with additional photographs of adjacent stores, and
provides a revised rendering that is to scale.
Figure 2.
CB/mwl
Z:\Commission Items\2014\12-02-14\ERPB Sign Appeal_5740 Sunset Dr\ERPB-14-006 AppeaLCM report.docx
ERPB-14-006 Appeal
December 2,2014
Page 3 of 6
Figure 3.
Subsequent to the February 4, 2014 ERPB meeting on the applicants request, the applicant and
business owner had four additional appearances before the ERPB. Below is a summarized
chronology of events that led to the final action of denial of the request at the October 7, 2014
ERPB meeting.
February 4,2014:
ERPB-14-006 -RazzleDazzle Barbershop
Signage Request Timeline
First appearance before the ERPB: The applicant proposed signage that would be located on
both the fascia board as well as above the storefront entrance. The applicant also proposed to
install a barber pole at the western edge of the storefront. The Board felt that the sign was too
large, overlapped adjacent businesses, and was out of scale due to the rendering that was
provided. Also, the barber pole should be moved closer to the entrance. Because of this, the
Board deferred the item with the condition that the applicant provides the Board with
additional photographs of adjacent stores, and provides a revised rendering that is to scale.
March 18, 2014:
Second appearance before the ERPB: The applicant resubmitted plans for review by the
ERPB. It was a consensus that the Board was not receptive to allowing signage on the fascia
board, and that the barber pole be relocated to the entrance of the store. Also, the Board felt
that the wording above the entrance appeared to be larger than the proposed area. Because of
this, the Board deferred the item with the condition that a drawing/picture that is to scale
detailing the correct location of the sign in relation to its surroundings be submitted.
CB/mwl
Z:\Commission Items\2014\ 12-02-14\ERPB Sign Appeal_S740 Sunset Dr\ERPB-14-006 Appeal_CM report.docx
ERPB-14-006 Appeal
December 2, 2014
Page 4 of 6
April 15, 2014:
Third appearance before the ERPB: The applicant resubmitted plans for review by the ERPB,
which weren't to scale. It was determined that the business already had window signage, of
which the business owner stated that the signs in question were put up in order to increase
traffic to the business. Board member Kelly stated that the window area of the storefront could
be utilized, and the Board discussed the possibility of modifying the configuration of the
proposed sign so that it can accommodate the window area. Because of this, the Board granted
final approval for the application with the condition that the sign "RazzleDazzle Barber Shop"
be placed above the projecting storefront window (only) that is closest to the sidewalk, and not
on the fascia board.
Sometime following the April 15, 2014 ERPB meeting, the applicant installed the sign that is
currently on the building. The sign is attached to the projecting storefront, but also extends out
over the alcove opening (Figure 4).
Figure 4.
I 10'-0" I
12" RAZZLE DAZZLE
~;~IBARBERSHOP I . .. ... . ··80,;···1
85
May 21, 2014:
R(VE:.RSE CHANNEL LS1~rERS; WITH LED
f3al"bel" Ghop !'l:>le ~;)!{ln
':7!,C(;~):
At:~'achcd f.:
~'lluf)ljnLln', p",l)wl
with 4 c)Cn:W,,0
/I 10 11/<1 by 11/;;>.
b:.Lt.(J.f,JC.6~~ .. f!r:..!7C;'}
1:12 \'Ot flGfJ 1'/.'.:.1; 1 '~AfAf'
1,:0 AM" C,RCUil
\:Y.O A~/'~' ;':,XTfRI!AI. DI,,,(
f01AL lOAO ''-' .",J"W
c,t.::OUN{;II,G I eO!~l)iND ,'f~ f'U::: l<l:C :<:'.A:;
j'<:l .... AK·i'N;~:!:: If It}> l~Y::: 'N'r .... "" 12 0WO\JN()
'\t.:. EI.(iCTf..",;",l. ,:OMI'ONl'Nf<j UII. 11;',: 1U{)
Code Enforcement Officer Bynum issued NOCI #0384 with a $350 penalty for erecting signage
without first obtaining an approval or a building permit from the City.
CB/mwl
Z:\Commission Items\2014\12-02-14\ERPB Sign AppeaL5740 Sunset Dr\ERPB-14-006 Appeal_CM report.docx
ERPB-14-006 Appeal
December 2, 2014
Page 5 of 6
July 17, 2014:
The appellant (business owner) appeared before the Special Magistrate on NOel #0384. At the
hearing, the magistrate ordered the case to continue for 60-days till the September hearing
agenda, to allow the property owner to re-appear before the ERPB on July 22, 2014 to get
approval for the signage installed without a permit.
July 22,2014:
Fourth appearance before the ERPB: The applicant submitted revised plans for review by
the ERPB. The plans submitted depicted the sign that was found to be in violation by Officer
Bynum. Because of the recessed design of the storefront, the Board showed concern with how
the sign would be attached to the building. Even though the business owner stated that the sign
is supported by anchors, the Board deferred the application so that the applicant could work
with the sign fabricator to address the Board'sconcerns, and come up with a design that would
adequately secure that portion of the sign that extended east of the storefront window over the
alcove entrance.
October 7, 2014:
Fifth appearance before the ERPB: The applicant resubmitted plans for review by the ERPB.
The design submitted was similar to the design submittal from the July 22nd meeting; the
difference was the addition of aluminum brackets to address the Board's concerns of how the
sign would be adequately secured to the structure (Figure 5). Although the sign fabricator
provided a revised design for securing the sign, the Board felt that the proposed signage would
not be securely fastened to the building. The Board then reiterated that the original approval
called for the sign to be placed above the projecting storefront window that is closest to the
sidewalk only and not as currently installed. The Board then denied the application, stating that
the design that was originally approved by the ERPB in April should be used.
October 7, 2014
Because the case was deferred from the July 22, 2014 ERPB meeting and denied at the October
7, 2014 ERPB meeting, the case will be scheduled for the next available Special Magistrate
hearing (November 20, 2014).
CB/mwl
Z:\Commission Items\2014\12-02-14\ERPB Sign AppeaU740 Sunset Dr\ERPB-14-006 Appeal_CM report.docx
ERPB-14-006 Appeal
December 2, 2014
Page 6 of 6
FIGURE 5.
10'-0"
12" RAZZLEDAZZLE
f!i BARBERSHOP
CONCLUSION:
i~grbt!· ;)~lOP ~j:){t:
Sp,-:,,,.i);
Atr,:li;hr:(~ ~.,)
;3jUI"rlI")lr'1 p,-:'vei
Ild;:J'.4 l>i>U-:"m ,·l'iJl/P"
!."
' .. f.' "f.~: 1,"'1 -'I-~.h.:)\0ih:·
t",,~·~r & '",'
Hi ~.J( .. h co"ncr
~ltt8c:h to n)of
'>I.,.. .. ,:.:-fC.e\.~t ~.
r;(l)( {(,'·,i.'/AkZH./
, , ,
The City Commission may approve the applicant's appeal, thereby approving the
signage as currently installed; deny the appeal whereby the applicant will need to
modify the design and location of the sign; or refer the applicant back to the ERPB for
reconsideration.
If the Commission should choose to approve the appeal, it is recommended that the
fastening schedule be reviewed by the Building Department for compliance and any
outstanding fees be paid prior to the issuance of a permit.
Attachments:
Resolution
ERPB Staff reports and Meeting Minutes
Notice of Appeal
CB/mwl
Z:\Commission Items\2014\ 12-02-14\ERPB Sign Appeal_S740 Sunset Dr\ERPB-14-006 Appeal_CM report.docx
1 RESOLUTION __________ __
2
3 A resolution resolving an appeal of a decision of the Environmental
4 Review and Preservation Board regarding the denial of signage at
5 5740 Sunset Drive.
6
7 WHEREAS, the Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB) at its February
8 4, 2014 meeting first reviewed Application No. ERPB 14-006 and deferred the request for
9 signage installation for a tenant space located at the 5740 Sunset Drive; and
10
11 WHEREAS, on March 18, 2014 the ERPB once more deferred the item, requesting
12 additional modifications; and
13
14 WHEREAS, on April 15, 2014 the ERPB granted final approval to the Application No.
15 ERPB-14-006 with the condition that the sign "RazzleDazzle Barber Shop" be placed above the
16 storefront window that is closest to the sidewalk, not on the fascia board and staff s conditions;
17 and
18
19 WHEREAS, sometime following the April 15, 2014 ERPB meeting, the applicant
20 installed the sign that is currently on the building; the sign being attached to the projecting
21 storefront, but also extending out over the alcove opening, whereby on May 21, 2014 the
22 applicant was issued a violation notice #0384 for erecting a sign with proper approvals and
23 without a building permit; and
24
25 WHEREAS, on July 22, 2014 the applicant resubmitted revised plans to the ERPB, as a
26 continuation of Application No. ERPB-14-006 requesting approval of the sign that had been
27 installed, whereby the Board deferred the application to have the sign installer further address
28 how the current sign could be better secured to the structure; and
29
30 WHEREAS, on October 7,2014 the applicant returned to the ERPB with revisions to the
31 fastening details as previously requested; and
32
33 WHEREAS, on October 7,2014 the ERPB again voiced concerns on how the sign was
34 proposed to be attached to the structure, and that the sign that was installed was twice the size of
35 the sign approved on April 15, 2014; whereby the Board denied Application No. ERPB-14-006;
36 and
37 WHEREAS, Section 20-6.2(A) of the Land Development Code allows for an appeal of
38 an ERPB decision to be made to the City Commission by the applicant, interested citizens, or the
39 City administration; and
40
41 WHEREAS, Section 20-6.2(E) of the Land Development Code provides that the City
42 Commission may reverse, affirm, or modify any decision of the Environmental Review and
43 Preservation Board on which there has been an appeal.
44
45 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY
46 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Section 1. The decision of the Environmental Review and Preservation Board made
October 7, 2014 regarding the approval of a signage installation located at 5740 Sunset Drive is
hereby __________________________________________________ __
Section 2. Severability. If any section clause, sentence, or phrase of this resolution is for
any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, the holding shall
not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this resolution.
Section 3. Effective Date. This resolution shall become effective immediately upon
approval by the City Commission.
PASSED AND ENACTED this ___ day of __________________ , 2014.
ATTEST: APPROVED:
CITY CLERK MAYOR
READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: COMMISSION VOTE:
LANGUAGE, LEGALITY AND Mayor Stoddard:
EXECUTION THEREOF Vice Mayor Harris:
Commissioner Liebman:
Commissioner Welsh:
Commissioner Edmond:
CITY ATTORNEY
City of South Miami
Environlnental Review and Preservation Board -E RP B
APPEAL OF DECISION TO CITY COMMISSION
Pursuant to Land Development Code Section 20-6.2 (A) an appeal of an ERPB final decision may be filed
within 30 days of the ERPB decision or before a building permit is issued whichever comes first. The appeal is
to be filed with the City Clerk upon a form prescribed by the Clerk. Appeals may be filed by the applicant, a
property owner, business owner or resident of the City, the City Administration, or an interested citizen in an
abutting municipality living within 500 feet of the property under review. The City Commission will hear and
enter a decision on all appeals within 60 days of the filing of an appeal. A fee of $1 00 must be paid by the
applicant at the time the appeal is filed.
ERPB Case No.: Date Of Decision ofERPB: /-1 1-IJrJ b (;!J M 7jt~)
Subject Address S7 '1 tJ <.. <;'P41~~lJA? L~ ~ __ .~_. ____ ---'
INDICATE YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO SUBJECT CASE:
Name (Print Name) Contact No
APPLICANT tfl er}tL )~}'() ct rc;<: -ECS--$0 ?? -S'IJ~
PROPERTY OWNER! RESIDENT 30V~l 5k'-1/~ 7~1P --3cj;,6-17<f3
BUSINESS OWNER EleL"n Ye <\, P -z" ~le ,I1t "<-2 /t-~., 1'1 "'-.... J, C::l 1 ,~.' --, C/\.. .
.,
CITY ADMINISTRATION
INTERESTED CITIZEN
X:\ERPB\ERPB Appcals\ERPB Appcnl Application Revised 2010.Joc
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW & PRESERVATION BOARD
To: Chair & Members
Environmental Review & Preservation B7ar
Via: Christopher Brimo, AICP, Director ,,12
Planning and Zoning De a' ment {;;' ."
From: Marcus W. Lightfoot
Zoning Review Coordin
Date:
Re:
February 4,2014
Tuesday 8:30 a.m.
ERPB-14-006
First Review
Request: Signage Installation
-------_ ....... _ ...... _ ...... _--------------_ ....................................... _--_ .. __ ._-
ERPB Applicant: ..................................... AAA On Time Electric
For: ...................................................... Razzle Dazzle Barbershop
Property Owner: ...................................... Seven Skies CO NV
Folio Numbers: ............................................... 09-4036-022-0050
Property Address: ..... , ............................ 5740 SW 72 Street
Zoning District: ..................... , ............... "SR-HDOV" Specialty Retail (Hometown District
Overlay)
Adjacent Zoning: .................... , ............... SR-HDOV (North, South, East, West)
Future Land Use Category: ........................ Mixed-Use Commercial Residential (Four-Story)
Building Use: ........................... ,. ............ General Retail
Flood Zone: ........................................... X-Zone (Not a Flood Zone)
APPLICANT'S REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting approval for the installation of signage for the above referenced
location.
STAFF ANALYSIS:
The applicant is proposing to install one (1) sign that will be mounted above the entrance
leading into the store. Considered to be a flat sign, Section 20-4.3(1)(5) All Other Zoning
Districts, of the Land Development Code, provides the following regulations for flat signs:
FLA T signs with a total aggregate sign area, not to exceed twenty (20)
percent of the area of any building face; for the purposes of sign
regulation, there shall be considered to be only four (4) facades to any
building; no single sign shall exceed two hundred (200) square feet in
area. Direct H/umination is permitted.
The proposed illuminated flat sign will consist of reverse channel letters that will read "RAZZLE
DAZZLE" on the first line and "BARBERSHOP" just below. The proposed sign will be flush
mounted to the building and will consist of a combination of black letters with a red outline,
detailing the colors of the company. The sign will have a combined height twenty-six (26)
inches, a maximum length of 12'-1/2", and a sign area of approximately 27.08 square feet. After
review of the proposed sign, it was found that it does not exceed 20% of the area allowed for
any building face (32.4 S.F.) and is less than two hundred (200) square feet in area.
The applicant is also proposing to install a traditional barber pole on the exterior of the
storefront. Located at the far right of the establishment, the proposed barber pole will be
mounted to the black aluminum storefront via screws at a height of eighty-four (84) inches
above the sidewalk, and will extend out from the building approximately ten (10) inches. When
reviewed, it was found that the height of the proposed barber pole complies with the regulations
listed in Section 20-3.3(E)(11) which states that non-stationary elements shall have a minimum
clearance of seven (7) feet above the sidewalk. Therefore, it is recommended that both the
proposed sign and the barber pole be approved.
MWL
Z;\ERPB\ERPB Agendas\2014 ERPB AGENDAS\ERPB FEBRUARY 4, 2014\ERPB-14·006.doc
5740 SW 72 Street
ERPB~14-006, presented on February 4, 2014
Signage Installation
Page 2 of 2
RECOMMENDATION: Approval with the following conditions:
1. No electrical wiring is to be exposed;
2. All signage from the previous tenant must be removed;
3. Any additional signage will require a separate submittal to the ERPB; and
4. Any comments and/or suggestions from the Board.
Attachments: ERPB Application; Fee Schedule: Part 1 of 4, dated January 23,2014; Sign Specifications; Applicant Photographs;
Leiter of Approval from Property Owner, dated January 28, 2014March 25, 2013.
MWL
Z:\ERPB\ERPB Aaendas\2014 ERPS AGENDAS\ERPB FEBRUARY 4. 2014\ERPB-14-006,doc
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
gNVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND fRESERVATION BOARD APPLICATION
STREET ADDRESS
OF JOB:
SOUTH MIAMI, FL
PROPERTY
OWNER:
TEL.
NO.
STATE liP
WHAT IS THE PRESENT USE OF THE PROPERTY?
SINGLE·FAMIL Y RESIDENCE BUSINESS .-.. -.............. . ..... -.... ----.---....... .... -----··-f-OFF'ICE
APARTMENT OR
TOWNHOUSE
MEDICAL OFFICE AUTO REPAIR
BRIEFLY SUMMARIZE THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED:
WHAT WILL THE TOTAL COST BE TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT? $ ..... ,"'¥-t""-:),.L-""CJ'-"O'--' ..:.:(,1'-(/ _______ _
APPLICANT'S NAME: Lz} ("..> It lc~' 0<--l d. i TEL NO.-?1i ~"z..7~ .. ~.CELL NO. _____ _
ADDRESS:l6' 0 ~ rYE: /()'l $7 !'--"t.. i",,}-J\. { eLI' V (l::;'/
STREET CITY STATE ZIP
WEBADDRESS: ___________________________________ FAXNO: _____________________ __
AS THE APPLICANT INDICATE YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO THIS PROJECT ,
OWNER OF THE PROPERTY TENANT! k CONTRACTOR OTHER:
LESSEE -.
OWNER OF THE BUSINESS ARCHITECT ENGINEER
INDICATE CONTACT PERSON (ERPB's decision will be mailed to the contact persoll indicated below)'
PROPERTY OWNER
-
( APPLICANT
OTHER (provide name and address)
-;2~ .. c l)~-./_t.) ... __ ~ t..'lJ'/..s A,· .. ~3:::.Lli
v SIGNATURE PRINT YOUR NAME
Z:IERPBIERPB ApplicationlERPB Revised Application Form -December -2011.doc
4
. (-2...3.~" GY'...
DATE
14" RAZZLEDAZZLE
I 1211/2
12" ~ARBER SHOP 10"
10· I
13 1 1/2
12"
REVERSE CHANNEL LETIERS WITH LED
10"
ALL WALL PENETRA liON SEALED 'Mil-' SILiCOKE
UL .ED WiRE 18 BY 2
WITH # 12 GROJND
#8 i AP CO, SCREWS 2" 1/2 lon~
(MIN. 4 PER LEIlERS)
BARBER POLE SIGN
24" SPECS:
AttecIIed to Aluminum Panel
with 4 ICIWWIt t10 11/4 by 1112
ELECTRICAL SPECS
1:12 VOLT/60 W.@ 1.5AMP.
1:20 AMP. CIRCUIT
1:20 AMP EXTERNAL DISC. SWITCH
TOTAL LOAD: 1.5 AMP.
GROUNDING j BONDING AS PER NEe 250
PR' MARY WIRE # 11:> BY 2 WlIH # 12 GROUND
ALL ELECTRiCAL COMPONENTS ULL LlSrED
SEVEN SKIES COMPANY INC
January 28, 2014
Via U.S. First Class Mail and
Via Hand Delivery
Razzle Dazzle
5740 Sunset Dr., South Miami, FI 33143
Re: Permit Approval
To Whom it may concern:
Please be advised/ that Seven Skies Company I Inc. agreed with
our tenant Razzle Dazzle to put the sign RaztJedazzle and a Barber "
Shop pole at his store.
I , Ii .
Besn Refards,
II J I
; fr~ ,
MARCH 18,2014 ERPB
ADDITIONAL MATERIALS REQUESTED FROM FEBRUARY MEETING
SEVEN SKIES COMPANY INC
January 28, 2014
Via U.S. First Class Mail and
Via Hand Delivery
Razzle Dazzle
5740 Sunset Dr., South Miami, Ff 33143
Re: PermIt Approval
To Whom It may concern:
Please be 13.dvised, that Seven Skies Company, Inc. agreed with
our tenant Razzle Dazzle to p:ut the sign Razzledqzz,le and a Barber.
Shop pale at his store.
~ 8es~.· R .. e.~~ards, l'tA .'J. ,_,_wi-~_I
-=):" t C~ . '. wrn
M-a , gemeflt",
Sev n Skies CO> .
L
1211/2
10"
12"
REVERSE CHANNEL LEURS WITH LED
ALL wALL fENETRA TION SEALED 'rnTlC SIL:CONE
BARBER POLE SIGN
24" SPECS:
A1t&ctied Ix) Aluminum PM&!
wtIh 1;1 _ #1611/4 by 1 112
JL _=-D M~E 18 BY 2:
\1;111-' I< 12 GRCJND
ELECTRICAL SPECS
~,12 VOL 1160 W.@ 1.5AMP.
1:20 AIv',P. CIRCUn-
1:20 AMP !:XTERr~AL DiSC. SWiTCH
TOTAL LQi",o : 1.5 AMP.
GROUNDING} BONDING AS PER NEe 250
PR'MARY WIRE # 18 BY 2 Wln-i # 12 GROU:--JD
All ELECTRICAL COMf'ONE.NTS ULc LISTED
I
I
10" RAZZLEDAZZLE 8.5"
• 10' 1-
9" BARBER SHOP
8 1 4" I
13 1 1/2
REVERSE CHANNEL LETTERS WITH LED
.063 A~LUMINJM SIDES,
ALL WALL PENETRATION SEALED WITt..; SILICONE I
" ~r~i LED STRIPS lIT, ""."
( )I"~
UL L"D WIRE 18 BY 2
WITt-: # 12 GROUND
PEEL & STICK ----4 j--[' '""7-"YI TRANSFORMER CAN BEHIND
#18 BY 2 LEO WIRE, .,/ I! ! ~ .~::~ ~L TO WALL PRIMARY
\'1'11.>-1 #12 GROUND j i ' r. •.• ;';;."' .
. 090 ALLUMINUM FRONTS. ----~I "i, ~'(q, DISCONNECT TOGGLE SWITCH ~ 1""',' RATED 20 AMPS
. ~1"'I,_T:i~ EXTERNA~ DISCONNECT -rt":"~'~ '-CONDUIT CO~\I~CTOR
SWITCH ---~-.: I' .,,~". FLEXIB~E METALLIC
10"
BARBER POLE SIGN
24" SPECS:
#8 TAP CON SCREWS 2" 1/2 lone
(MIN. 4 PER LETTERS)
Attached to Aluminum Panel
with 411C1'eW8110 1114 by 1112
ELECTRICAL SPECS
1:12 VOLT/60 W.@1.5AMP.
1:20 AMP. CIRCUIT
1:20 AMP EXTERNAL DISC. SWITCH
TOTAL LOAD: 1.5 AMP.
GROUNDING I BONDING AS PER NEC 250
PRIMARY WIRE # 11' BY 2 WlTH # 12 GROUND
ALL ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS ULL LISTED
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW & PRESERVATION BOARD
To: Chair & Members
Environmental Review & Preservation Board
Via: Chris~opher Bri~o, AICP, Director Hi'Y~V
Planmng and Zomng Depart ent .
From: Marcus W. Lightfoot
Zoning Review Coorcfina r
Date:
Re:
April 15, 2014
Tuesday 8:30 a.m.
ERPB-14-006
Third Review
Request: Signage Installation
......... ~ ..... ----.---................................ -.-------.----.. -.-......... ~.-.•........... ~ ............................................. ----
ERPB Applicant: .............. , ...... , ................. AAA On Time Electric
For: .................................... , .................. Razzle Dazzle Barbershop
Property Owner: ... '" ................................ Seven Skies CO NV
Folio Numbers: ........ , ...................................... 09-4036-022-0050
Property Address:... .. . ... ... ... ... ... . . . . . . ... . ... 5740 SW 72 Street
Zoning District: .................................... "SR-HDOV" Specialty Retail (Hometown District
Overlay)
Adjacent Zoning: ....................... " ........... SR-HDOV (North, South, East, West)
Future Land Use Category: ........................ Mixed-Use Commercial Residential (Four-Story)
Building Use: ................. " ...................... General Retail
Flood Zone: ...................................... " ... X-Zone (Not a Flood Zone)
APPLICANT'S REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting approval for the installation of signage for the above referenced
location.
STATUS UPDATE:
Originally appearing before the Environmental Review & Preservation Board at its March 18,
2014 meeting, this item was deferred so that the applicant could provide the Board with a
drawing/picture to scale that details the correct location of the sign in relation to its
surroundings. At the request of the Board, the applicant has submitted a revised drawing for
review as well a photograph of the site. Staff has attached additional photographs in an effort to
supplement the photographs provided by the applicant.
STAFF ANALYSIS:
The applicant is proposing to install two (2) signs that will be mounted above the entrance
leading into the store. Considered to be flat signs, Section 20-4.3(1)(5) All Other Zoning Districts,
of the Land Development Code, provides the following regulations for flat signs:
FLA T signs with a total aggregate sign area, not to exceed twenty (20)
percent of the area of any building face; for the purposes of sign
regulation, there shall be considered to be only four (4) facades to any
building; no single sign shall exceed two hundred (200) square feet in
area. Direct illumination is permitted.
Both illuminated flat signs will consist of reverse channel letters that will read "RAZZLE
DAZZLE" and "BARBERSHOP" respectively. Based on the revised drawings that were
provided, the portion of the "RAZZLE DAZZLE" sign will be flush mounted to the fascia above
the store and will have a height of twelve (12) inches, a length of ten (10) inches, and a sign
area of approximately ten (10) square feet. The "BARBERSHOP" sign will be located on the left
side of the storefront, just above the storefront windows. Consisting of white colored lettering
that will be flush mounted to the building, the sign will have a height of nine (9) inches, a length
of eighty (80) inches, and a sign area of approximately five (5) feet. When reviewed against the
elevations that were provided by the applicant, it was found that the "BARBERSHOP" sign was
MWL
Z:IERPBIERPB Agendas\2014 ERPB AGENDASIERPB APRIL 15, 2014IERPB-14-006.doc
5740 SW 72 Street
ERPB-14-006, presented on April 15, 2014
Signage Installation
Page 2 of 2
smaller than the proposed location, allowing it to fit within the space provided. Furthermore, it
was found that while the name of the business "RAZZLE DAZZLE BARBERSHOP" is split up
into two separate signs, and was reviewed separately, it is considered to be one sign that
complies with the regulations listed above for flat signs.
When reviewed against the other signage for this building, it was found that the only tenant that
has signage mounted to the fascia is the corner tenant, Buns & Buns. While there is no signage
master plan for this building, it has been common practice that all signage for this building be
located just above the storefront entrance and not mounted to the fascia, which is reserved only
for the corner tenant. If the sign is to be relocated to the area above the entrance, then either a
further reduction in size or a total redesign would be necessary in order to accommodate the
proposed signage.
The applicant is also proposing to install a traditional barber pole on the exterior of the
storefront. Previously proposed for the far right of the establishment, the applicant has relocated
the proposed barber pole to the entrance into the establishment. The proposed barber pole will
be mounted to the black aluminum storefront via screws at a height of eighty-four (84) inches
above the sidewalk, and will extend out from the building approximately ten (10) inches. When
reviewed, it was found that the height of the proposed barber pole complies with the regulations
listed in Section 20-3.3(E)(11) which states that non-stationary elements shall have a minimum
clearance of seven (7) feet above the sidewalk. Therefore, it is recommended that both the
proposed sign and the barber pole be approved.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval with the following conditions:
1. No electrical wiring is to be exposed;
2. All signage from the previous tenant must be removed;
3. Any additional signage will require a separate submittal to the ERPB; and
4. Any comments and/or suggestions from the Board.
Attachments: ERPS Application; Fee Schedule: Part 1 of 4, dated January 23, 2014: ERPB Meeting Minutes Excerpt, dated
March 18, 2014; Staff Photographs; Leiter of Approval from Property Owner, dated January 28, 2014; Sign
Specifications (Comparison); Sign Specifications; Applicant Photographs; Elevation Rendering; Scaled Far;:ade
Elevation.
MWL
Z:IERPSIERPS Aoendas12014 ERPB AGENDASIERPB APRIL 15. 2014IERPB-14-006,doc
L
H
13' 1/2
REVERSE CHANNEL LETTERS WITH LED
ALL WALL PEt;ETRAnON SEALED WID-' SILICONE
#18 BY 2 LED WIRE
WiTh 1'l2 GROUND
.D90 ALLUMINUM FRONIS.-
10"
EXTERNA~ DISCONNECT • '-CONDUIT CON\J~CTOR
SWITCH FLEXlB~E MET ALLIe
tl81N' CON so;EW5 2" 112 lor.g
(MIN. 4 PER LEITERS)
BARBER POl.1: SIGN
24" SPECS;
Atmched to Aluminum Panel
wItb 4 fSC~ #10 tl/4 by 1112
ELECTRICAL SPECS
1:12 VOLT!60 W.@t5AMP.
1:20 AMP. CIRCUIT
1:20 AMP EXTERNAL DISC. SWITCH
TOTAL LOAD: 15 AMP,
GROUNDING / BONDING AS PER NEe 250
PRI"'~ARY WIRE # IE> BY 2 vv1TH It 12 GROUND
ALL ELECTRICAL COMPONEN-S ULL LISTED
10'-0" ._------_. __ .. -
BARBERSHOP
80"
107" 84"
REVERSE CHANNEL LETTERS WITH LED
3/16" DIA. BRASS
STAND OfF
(OPTIONAL)
112"·1" WIDE ALUM.
FLAT BAR MAY BE FASTENED
WISCREW OR BOLT & NUT
MIN, PER 4 fER LETTER
.090 ALUM,
REVERSE CHANNEL LETTER .-.,.
1-20 AMP DISCONNECT
SWITCH (IN VIEW)
LED ILLUMINATED
SECTIONS
BONDING JUMFERS
(MIN. No 14 COFFER) REO'D IF
(1) FLEXIBLE MEl"'L CONDUIT IN GROUND
RETURN PATH EXCEEDS 6 fT. (2) COI>:DUIT IS
NON METALLIC AND lOR (3) ELECTRODE
RECEFtA,CLE USES GASKETS THAT WilL IMPAIR
GROUND RETURN FATH OR DIRECT METAL
TO METAL CONTACT
-•. _. METAL TRANSFORMER
BOX (GALVANIZED)
TO PRIMARY BY
OTHERS AS FER NEC 600-21
T-20 AMP DISCONNECT SWITCH (IN VIEW)
1-112" X H12" X 1/8"
,\NGLE BRACKET
TAP CON A"Uiv'INUM SCREWS
DRIVE PINS OR RED HEAD ANCHORS
5!16" X 2 1(,"
Barber shop Pole Sign
Specs:
Attached to
aluminum panel
with 4 screws
# 10 11/4 by 11/2
ELECTRICAL SPECS
1:12 YOLT/60 W.@1.5AMP.
1:20 AMP. CIRCUIT
10" 1:20 AMP EXTERNAL DISC. SWITCH
TOTf,L LOi'ID: 1.5 AMP.
GROUNDING / BONDING f,S PER NEC 250
PRIMARY WiRE # 10 BY 2 WITH # 12 GROUND
ALL ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS ULL LISTED
I
·-1
a
LD
0 t()
t<) z -'
-' i.L « 2 lD u
Q2 « ci)
~ N i-N U f:: w UJ
-' u N
ll.l « <.6 ll.l !li
2 !li ~ ll.l i= i-±: z a Sl... a S « ;;: « « z
a lD
\l)
RAZZLEDAZZLE BARBERSHOP
ATTACHED TO THIS WALL
ATTACHED TO THIS WALL
THE UTY Or PLEASANT IIVINC
To:
FROM:
THRU:
DATE:
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Chairman & Members of the ERPB
Marcus W. Lightfoot, Zoning Review Coordinator
Christopher Brimo, AICP -Director
July 22, 2014
Request: Signage Installation
Agenda Item No.: ERPB-14-006
Fourth Review
ERPB Applicant: Razzle Dazzle Barbershop
For: Razzle Dazzle Barbershop
Property Owner: Seven Skies CO NV
Folio Number: 09-4036-022-0050
Property Address: 5740 SW 72 Street
Zoning District: "SR-HDOV" Specialty Retail-Hometown
District Overlay
Adjacent Zoning: SR-HDOV (North, South, West); NR (East)
Future Land Use Category: Mixed-Use Commercial Residential (Four
Story)
Current Use: General Retail
Flood Zone: X-Zone (Not in a Flood Zone)
ApPLICANT'S REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting approval for the installation of signage for the store located at
5740 SW 72 Street.
STATUS U PDAI"~:
Appearing before the Environmental Review & Preservation Board at its f\pril "IS, 2014
meetingl this item was granted final approval by the Board with the condition that the sign
"Razzle Dazzle Barbershop" be placed above the storefront window that is closest to the
sidewalk, not on the fascia board. On May 21, 2014, the business was cited by Code
Enforcement for the installation of signage without a building permit. It was at this time
that staff was notified that the sign installed did not cornply with the conditions for
approval by the Board. Instead of removing the sign, the applicant has elected to submit
signage plans for the revised design to the Board for review and approval.
5T AFF AN6LY?J?:
The applicant is proposing to install one (1) sign that will be mounted above the entrance
into the business. Considered to be a flat signl Section 20-4.3(1)(5) All Other Zoning
Districts, of the Land Development Code, provides the following regulations for flat signs:
5740 SW 72 Street
ERPB-14-006 presented on July 22, 2014
Signage Installation
Page 2 of 2
FlA T SIGNS with a total aggregate sign area; not to exceed twenty (20)
percent of the area of any building face/ for the pwposes of sign regulation;
there shall be considered to be only four (4) facades to any building' 170
single sign shall exceed two hundred (200) square feet in area. D,i'ect
illumination is permitted
The revised design consists of silver colored reverse channel letters located directly above
the entrance leading into the store that will also have a red colored illumination along its
background. The sign, which will read "RAZZLEDAZZLE BARBERSHOP/, will then be
mounted onto a black colored background. The sign will have a total height of twenty-one
(21) inches, a total length of ten (10) feet, and a sign area of approximately 17.5 square
feet.
The applicant is also proposing to install a traditional barber pole on the exterior of the
storefront. Previously granted approval for the left side of the establishment near the
entrance, the applicant is proposing to relocate the barber pole to the far right of the
storefront. The proposed barber pole will be mounted to the black aluminum storefront via
screws at a height of eighty-four (84) inches above the sidewalk, and will extend out from
the building approximately ten (10) inches.
CONCLUSION:
After review of the proposed revision, the sign does not exceed twenty (20) percent of the
area of any building face (28.1 SF), and is less than two hundred square feet in area. While
it is different in design from what was previously approved, the proposed design is similar
to the signage found at other Razzle Dazzle locations in South Florida. Furthermore, when
reviewing the barber pole, it was found that the height of the proposed barber pole
complies with the regulations listed in Section 20-3.3(E)(11) which states that non-
stationary elements shall have a minimum clearance of seven (7) feet above the sidewalk.
Because of this, staff has recommended approval for the proposed revision to the signage
as well as the barber pole.
R~S;:QMMEN DATIONS:
Staff recommends Approval with the following conditions:
1. No electrical wiring is to be exposed;
2. Any additional signage will require a separate application to the ERPB for review and
approval; and,
3. Any comments and/or suggestions from the Board.
iviV/L
ERPB Application, dilted July 7, 2014; Fcc Sr.:hcdulc, part 1 ur 4, ,hluJ July 1 ·1, 2014; [Rf'B Meeting Minutes
ExccrpL (bled /\pril LJ, 2(lI4; Letter of Intenl frem the Ilu,in",$ (;wncr, dilled July 7, 2014; t\pplicant
Photographs; AH Signs f:!...,. Service Invoice; c!(Jted DecPn1bcr '}(:;! ~::Ol J; f\r.17Zlc f);-!zz!c Brand Phntographs; Sign
'ipcci(icl,;ons; EI<I'B-14-0()(j i]iiCKUP !V'iller;,ll, dilled April 15,201 'I.
7:\ERril\CRI'll AgC!1c!;,s\201 '1 ERPll I\ClNU/\S\[Rl'il JUI Y 2.>, !Ol ,I \ERI'B! ,q)Ufi.fi()(x
fH E CITY OF FLEi\S/\N r UVINC
To:
FROM:
THRU:
DATE:
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Chairman & Members of the ERPB
Marcus W. Lightfoot, Zoning Review Coordinator
Christopher Brimo, AICP -Director
October 7,2014
Request: Signage Installation
Agenda Item No.: ERPB-14-006
Fifth Review
ERPB Applicant: Razzle Dazzle Barbershop
For: Razzle Dazzle Barbershop
Property Owner: Seven Skies CO NV
Folio Number: 09-4036-022-0050
Property Address: 5740 SW 72 Street
Zoning District: "SR-HDOV" Specialty Retail-Hometown
District Overlay
Adjacent Zoning: SR-HDOV (North, South, West); NR (East)
Future Land Use Category: Mixed-Use Commercial Residential (Four
Story)
Current Use: General Retail
Flood Zone: X-Zone (Not in a Flood Zone)
ApPLICANT'S REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting approval for the installation of sign age for the store located
at 5740 SW 72 Street.
STATUS U PDA TE:
Appearing before the Environmental Review & Preservation Board at its July 22, 2014
meeting, the item was deferred with the condition that the applicant work with the sign
company to come up with a design that attaches back to the storefront. In response to
the comments from the previous meeting, the applicant has revised the drawings in
order to show how the sign will be mounted to the building. The new design shows
that a minimum of two (2) %" aluminum brackets will be installed at each corner of the
sign, which then attaches to the bottom portion of the roof.
STAFF ANALYSIS:
The applicant is proposing to install one (1) sign that will be mounted above the
entrance into the business. Considered to be a flat sign, Section 20-4.3(1)(5) All Other
Zoning Districts, of the Land Development Code, provides the following regulations for
flat signs:
5740 SW 72 Street
ERPB-14-006 presented on October 7, 2014
Signage Installation
Page 2 of 2
FlAT SIGNS with a total aggregate sign area/ not to exceed twenty (20)
percent of the area of any building face/ for the purposes of sign
regulation/ there shall be considered to be only four (4) facades to any
building/ no single sign shall exceed two hundred (200) square feet in
area. Direct illumination is permitted
The revised design consists of silver colored reverse channel letters located directly
above the entrance leading into the store that will also have a red colored illumination
along its background. The sign, which will read "RAZZlEDAZZLE BARBERSHOP," will
then be mounted onto a black colored background. The sign will have a total height of
twenty-one (21) inches, a total length of ten (10) feet, and a sign area of approximately
17.5 square feet.
The applicant is also proposing to install a traditional barber pole on the exterior of the
storefront. Previously granted approval for the left side of the establishment near the
entrance, the applicant is proposing to relocate the barber pole to the far right of the
storefront. The proposed barber pole will be mounted to the black aluminum
storefront via screws at a height of eighty-four (84) inches above the sidewalk, and will
extend out from the building approximately ten (10) inches.
CONCLUSION:
After review of the proposed revision, the sign does not exceed twenty (20) percent of
the area of any building face (28.1 SF), and is less than two hundred square feet in area.
While it is different in design from what was previously approved, the proposed design
is similar to the sign age found at other Razzle Dazzle locations in South Florida.
Furthermore, when reviewing the barber pole, it was found that the height of the
proposed barber pole complies with the regulations listed in Section 20-3.3(E)(11)
which states that non-stationary elements shall have a minimum clearance of seven (7)
feet above the sidewalk. Because of this, staff has recommended approval for the
proposed revision to the signage as well as the barber pole.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends Approvalwith the following conditions:
1. No electrical wiring is to be exposed;
2. Any additional signage will require a separate application to the ERPB for review
and approval; and,
3. Any comments and/or suggestions from the Board.
ATTACHMENTS:
MWl
ERPB Application, dated July 7, 2014; Fee Schedule, part 1 of 4, dated July 11, 2014; ERPB Meeting Minutes
Excerpt, dated July 22,2014; ERPB-14-006 Backup Material, dated July 22, 2014; letter from the Owner, dated
September 8, 2014; letter of Intent from the Business Owner, dated July 7, 2014; Sign Details; All Signs &
Service Invoice, dated December 26, 2013.
Z:\ERPB\ERPB Agendas\2014 ERPB AGENDAS\ERPB OCTOBER 7, 2014\ERPB-14-006.docx
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
g~ViRoNMENTA~ Ri:2V.IE\fIJ<ANDESE.R'lA:rION BOARD APPLICATION
.•.. '., ~-A22LL1)fV.-z."2J;G hoP
STREE: ADDRESS. "1 A-O < <:'1 L n <-~ ..
OF JOB. . "'r .I..JW J..J\...t.I. :!,;..."..";.,.,;.,.~.";.,.,;.,..;,;;""",;"";",;;";,;,;;;";""",;~",""""..,,.;,:.,.....,..,,.~~:.,;t:;~~::;t;:.,..,,,,...-,,,
PROPERTY
OWNER:
ADDRESS:
!SINGLE-FAMIL Y RESIDENCE
-' ~.
11-:'
APARTMENT OR ..
TOWNHOUSE
WHAT IS THE PRESENT USE OF THE PROPERTY?
~ .. , V ~~ .
BUSINESS V < RETAIL STORE r-:.£lJi ER~ .
OFFICE J-" BIW-S~hOP MEDICAL OFFICE
.,
AUTO REPAIR
.
.... . "
AS THE INDICATE YOUR RELATIONSHIPTO,THIS PROJECT ...
OWNER OF THE PROPERTY TENANT! I', CONTRACTOR OTHER;
LESSEE
OWNER OF THE BUSINESS ARCHITECT ENGINEER
vy.~ ~ .. ,,~'"
PROPERTY OWNER
APPLICANT
. OTHER (provide name and address)
DATE
Z:IEPPBlEHPB ApplicationlEHf'B Revised Application Form -December -2011.doc
July 7, 2014
City of South Miami
Environmental Review & Preservation Board
Re: RAZZLE DAZZLE BARBERSHOP Sign (Case #14~781/NOCI: 0384)
Dear Sir,
I am writing to request special consideration, in regards to my 7 months of hardship
with the RazzIeDazzle Barbershop sign.
On December 26, 2013, I hired Luis Arnaldi who presented himself-as a contractor,
to do a sign for "RazzleDazzle Barbershop" in South Miami. Luis and I met on site
after I signed the lease to my 6th location and he took the appropriate
measurements. The sign was from then on, in his hands, to follow any and all
regulations in order for my sign to properly be installed. Any requirements from the
Landlord or miscellaneous information needed to assist Mr. Arnaldi, was just a
phone call away and our communication clearly laid out the expectations for the job.
Please see attached the PAID contract, which includes permitting fees. I take full
responsibility for not researching his credentials prior to hiring him.
I opened RazzleDazzle Barbershop in February 2014, without a sign. I knew this
wouldn't draw much business in, since we were new to the area and did not have
much exposure, due mainly to the narrow and awkward space in which we
presently reside.
Luis was in constant contact with me, telling me that it is along process with all the
paperwork and permits needing to be pulled for approval. This was part of the con,
conjecture on Luis's part} and delayed the placement of my sign, ultimately hurting
my business.
Luis and I went in front of the Environmental Review & Preservation Board on
April 15, 2014, and our sign was approved. After approval from the board, Luis
failed to comply with the process of pulling permits and took it upon himself to
install the sign. Luis was overpaid to make sure he complied with EACH AND EVERY
City of South Miami requirement. Once the sign was installed, the community
241 Miracle Mile Cora) Gables, FL 33134 305-58·8081
acknowledged that RazzleDazzle Barbershop was in town. This may be proven by
our sales report.
After receiving a summons that was left by a city inspector on
May 21, 2014 for our sign, we did some investigation. It was discovered he was
scamming me for my money without completing the assigned job. Luis Arnaldi is a
sub contractor for a company by the name of All Signs, and he had a contractor
review his papeIWork by signing off for the jobs he has done. The plans that were
submitted to the Environmental Review & Preservation Board had fraudulent
contact information in regards to Luis. When confronting Luis with this information,
he was unprofessional and immediately disconnected our phone call. When trying
to track down the real contractor, since Mr. Arnaldi was not willing to help, I was
able to reach Robert Katzman, the owner of AAA ON TIME ELECTRICAL INC., and he
agreed to collaborate with the City of South Miami and I with the process of moving
fOIWard. I am currently seeking legal advice on how to take action from here since J
cannot afford to hire a new sign company. Please consider and allow my sign to
remain as is, since it is essential to the success of my business.
Thank you in advance for your consideration.
241 Miracle Mile Coral Gables, FL 33134 305-58-8081
Store Front 01 Store Front 02
Left Neighbor -Blue Fish
THE BRAND
REVERSE CHANNEL LEITERS WITH LED
3/16"'. DIA.~--'",*,,""""""---""""""-\. $t~Ntf.Off· ,
(DrnON'Ai.) .
UZ'.;'t'" ¥'''(QE fJ.UM,
FLAT ""'R!Mif!!>E i'A",tENW
WlSI;1:fSH.Or: e¢l,T".Nur
M~<j"$t4 i~,l..Sl~lt,
:-;:!C' AMY p,eCONJ>;5qt_ '/
.SWiTc,,'''q;J>J".\>'tEw') . ~~' ............ /
L"D ILLUMIN"TED ~
SEctiONs
"'!UmlrHlm 1'",,<<1
\l!(ltt'4~"""
#,10 11/41ty i liZ
OOt-.:DINO ';lJMf"~RS
(MIN .. Nt> 14 COPPER.) F'.EQ"D IF
(Q FLExiBLE MET ..... L CON?UIT IN G'ROUND
R~URN P,f.TH EXCEEDS e Fr. (2) CONDU/"! 15
NQti MItrA!..\.~~'~I'\NO iOR"'PY at:cr~COi:r·. . .
~~~~~~i~~~;:~)~V~~~~A~
'-0 ME:."TAL CDN1'ACT
. '-~ METAL TRANGFOKMER
BOX (GAtVA~JZED)
""\.'" 10 PRIMARY EW
OTHERS AS PER. NEe ~OO'2i
T~20 AMP DISCONNECT S'NtTCrl (IN VIEW)
1",,'" CON ~LUMINUM 5CRE\IVS
DRtVE PINS OR REO HEAD Al<.lCHOR6
SJ16"X2 \.k"
ELECTRICAL GPECS
~:12 YOLTl60 W.e» 1.5AMP",
1;20 AMP. CII<CUIT
,,20 "MP EXTERNAL Ol&<;. SWITCH
-rar AL LOAD: 1.5 AMP.
GROUNDII<lG / f;ONDING AS fER NEC 250
P>:IMAItY WIl<:E # 11.\ I>Y 2 WlTH ,. 12 G!':OUI;D
"Ll. El.eCTRICAL COMPONENTS Ul.L USTED
'-i-"
~ -J:
D
t ~""""--\$)
<:: ;:;,
\f)
~
4')
il5
0 .t-~ ,<)
~ -'
-' ll..
~ S; t2 -< b 5E ~
UJ W j:::
..J U <';J UJ -<
W "" ~ ~ "" i= {:!! ± a C:: "-S ~ 3:: :z
a
lC)
'"
10"
s
13' 112
R..l"VERSE CHANNEL LEiTERS WITH LED
All WAU. rwETV, nON SEAJ£D WIIr: SIUWI\i::
LEOSTRJI'5
crm&$;b;;l .
it1b 6Y21.::'H'l,~ ...
WlTl-I#lZGJ:DUloid
;CSOAU.1JW.i:'tlMF.JWNr~ •...
IMRaER POJ..X;; s.!\lN
SPEcs:
til!'si\'\~id!.l'fZ
. ,(:tf\M:i<;"1Z~NP
f:-'" ¥._ . .
;/;:Q'; .. I;;$;Cltl.1!;i:;C!,f; flEHlNO
> !d~j;u;rii~!,
::.3 rAP Wf~ 5C.Jt€'N$ Z' 112 kJroe
(MlN. 4 fi:IUEiTE:R5)
AI:lseIl!>d 10 Aklmbwm Pam»
with 11 __ IMO 1114 by 'I tJ2
~kEC:IRICAL SPECS
1;12 VOLT/60W.@!.5AMP.
1:20 AMP. CIRCIlIT
1:20 AMf' EXTERNhL DiSC. 5hHCH
rarAL LOAD :1.5 AMP.
G.R:OUNDlNG f eONOING AS PER NEe 250
PRIMARY \\IIRE # 15 BY Z IWfH it 12 GROUND
ALl. ELECTRICAL COMi'ONENT5 ULL LISTED
I
I
I
I I
I
r I
!
I !
I
II
10'-0"
9" I I ---;-
REVERSE CHANNEL LETIERS WITH LED
M\lOING JUMfEE:S
(MIN. N~ 14 COf!"E~) REero If
(1) FLEXiBLE METAl CON:>UIT ON GROUNO
Rerui<N PATH EXCEEDS 6 fT. (2) CONDUIT 15
NDN MEtAlliC. ANO lOR (3) ElECfROCE
RECEf",ACLE USES GASKETS Tii,AJ WlU IWAI"
GROUND RETUJ:.~~ PATK OR OlRECT METAL
I TO METAL CONTACT
l:C~,M"T.,," T!WJSFORMEK
W;o:' (Gr,LVANZED)
", T() P'KIMAKY l>Y
Ol"HERS ."5 PER NEe 6/XJ.Z!
T~2D A\1F' DiSC,oNNECf S~1rcH (!N VlZi:"V)
,1-112" X!-1I2:" x Vb"
. ANGLE BUC"'"
t?iir.~t .. ~f']''o!c.S!§1'I
5F~;" '
At:r-s.:::he-J''l:O
El.ECIRlCAL;iPEQ?
1:12 VOL Tl60 W.fJl1.5AMF.
120 AMf'. CIRCUIT
1;20 AMP EXTERNAL DISC-5wm:;,;
rOf!'.!. LOAD: l.5 AMF.
GROUNDING I BONDING N5 PER NEC =
PRJMARYWlRE * 1e, BYZVl.rH;t 12 GRCUND
f,lL EL.ECTRlCAl COMPONENTS ULl LISTED
RAZZLEDAZZLE
i\TlACHED TO iHtS \\'ALL
BARBERSHOP
ATTACHED TO THIS ~VAL.L
Date: September 8, 2014
To:
The City of South Miami of Environmental Review & Preservation Board
From:
Elena Linares; Owner of RazzleDazzle Barbershops
Re: RAZZLEDAZZLE BARBERSHOP Sign
The following is to request that the existing RazzleDazzle sign remain in
its position. The revisions suggested by the Environmental Review and
Preservation Board are added to the new drawing.
Thank you in advance once again for your support during this lengthy
process.
Sincerely,
C ,~ ~C(?;r"~
eLinares /
Date: July 7,2014
To: The City of South Miami of Environmental Review & Preservation Board
From: Elena Linares; Owner of RazzleDazzle Barbershops
Re: RAZZLEDAZZLE BARBERSHOP Sign
I am writing to request special consideration, in regards to my 7 months of hardship
with the RazzleDazzle Barbershop sign.
On December 26,2013, I hired Luis Arnaldi who presented himself as a contractor,
to do a sign for "RazzleDazzle Barbershop" in South Miami. Luis and I met on site
after I signed the lease to my 6th location and he took the appropriate
measurements. The sign was from then on, in his hands, to follow any and all
regulations in order for my sign to properly be installed. Any requirements from the
Landlord or miscellaneous information needed to assist Mr. Arnaldi, was just a
phone call away and our communication clearly laid out the expectations for the job.
Please see attached the PAID contract, which includes permitting fees. I take full
responsibility for not researching his credentials prior to hiring him.
I opened RazzleDazzle Barbershop in February 2014, without a sign. I knew this
wouldn't draw much business in, since we were new to the area and did not have
much exposure, due mainly to the narrow and awkward space in which we
presently reside.
Luis was in constant contact with me, telling me that it is a long process with all the
paperwork and permits needing to be pulled for approval. This was part of the con,
conjecture on Luis's part, and delayed the placement of my sign, ultimately hurting
my business.
Luis and I went in front of the Environmental Review & Preservation Board on
April 15, 2014, and our sign was approved. After approval from the board, Luis
failed to comply with the process of pulling permits and took it upon himself to
install the sign. Luis was overpaid to make sure he complied with EACH AND EVERY
City of South Miami requirement. Once the sign was installed, the community
acknowledged that RazzleDazzle Barbershop was in town. This may be proven by
our sales report.
After receiving a summons that was left by a city inspector on
May 21,2014 for our sign, we did some investigation. It was discovered he was
scamming me for my money without completing the assigned job. Luis Arnaldi is a
sub contractor for a company by the name of All Signs, and he had a contractor
review his paperwork by signing off for the jobs he has done. The plans that were
submitted to the Environmental Review & Preservation Board had fraudulent
contact information in regards to Luis. When confronting Luis with this information,
he was unprofessional and immediately disconnected our phone call. When trying
to track down the real contractor, since Mr. Arnaldi was not willing to help, I was
able to reach Robert Katzman, the owner of AAA ON TIME ELECTRICAL INC., and he
agreed to collaborate with the City of South Miami and I with the process of moving
forward. I am currently seeking legal advice on how to take action from here since I
cannot afford to hire a new sign company. Please consider and allow my sign to
remain as is, since it is essential to the success of my business.
Barber Bhop Pole Sign
Specs: 24"
Attached to
aluminum panel
with 4 screws
# 10 11/4 by 11/2
REVERSE CHANNEL LEiTERS WliH LED
84"
3116" DIA. BRASS
StA.ND OFF
(CPTIONAl)
112"-1" WIDE ALUlvi.
fLAT BAR MAY BE FASTS-lED
W/sCREW OR BOLi & NUT
MN. PER 4 PER LETTER
.090 ALUM.
REVERSE CHANNEL LETJ'ER ...
1-20 AMP DiSCONNECT
SWITCH (IN VIEW)
lED ILLUMINATED
SECTIONS
1/4" aluminum brackets (2 min,)
in each corner
attach to roof
C)ESIGN CRITERIA ASCE '/-10
F'BC2010
EXP. CAT. C BLDG. CAT 2
Ii== 170 MPH
F'w= 52 f'SF
BONDING JU~1fERS
(MIN. No 14 COPPER) REQ'O IF
(1) FLEXIBLE METAL CONDUIT IN GROUt~D
RETURN PATH EXCEEDS 6 Fl (2) CONDUIT IS
NON METALLIC. AND lOR (3) ELECTRODE
RECEPTACLE USES GASKETS rHAT Will IMPAIR
GROUND RETURN PATH OR DiRECT METAL
TO METI\L CONTACT
.." MET,A,L TRANSfORMER
BOX {GALVANIZED)
fO PRIMARY BY
OTHERS AS PER NEC 600-21
1-20 AMP DISCONNECf SWliCH (IN VIEW)
1-1/2" X 1-1/2" X 1/8"
L ••••••• ., ••. .,., .. ANGLE BRACKET
TAP CON ALUMINUM SCREWS
DRIVE PINS OR RED HEAD ANCHORS
5/16" X 2 'h"
Mim embed 2'(2
ELECTRICAL DA:IA
1 -20 AMPS CIRCUIT #12-14
PHOTOCEll
DISCONNECT SWlTCH AT SIGN.
786-277 -2285
1651 NE 110
NORTH MIAMI, 33181
DESCRIPTION
, r
PI'~rtL~(~' ~ '"
D C! ( b G pe y j'tW-i fi' /) ,)-
0': \~tL~ pet J,. e~~ nJ, j!
D /I j ! ~ , ed e:rJ...?-z e
6 d}' b cPt S' /;Iof) /6 it
r:r<t
( {'/ Lf
~~
TI
30 WORKING DAYS FROM DATE APPROVAL
50% REQUIRED
BALANCE TO BE PAm TO INSTALLATION CREW AT THV1E Or
INSTALLATiON
SIGNATURE
I I
DATE:
I z. -2-t; '-t3
1",0.#:
UNIT PRICE TOTAL
MINUTES
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
EnvironmentalReview & Preservation Board
Regular Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, Febru ary4,201.4,
City COlnmissionChambers.
8:30A,M .....
City of South Miami Ordinance No. 08-06-1876 requires all lobbyists before engaging in any lobbying activities
to register with the City Clerk and pay an annual fee of $500 per Ordinance No. 44-08-1979. This applies to all
persons who are retained (whether paid or not) to represent a business entity or organization to influence "City"
action. "City" action is broadly described to include the ranking and selection of professional consultants, and
virtually all-legislative, quasi-judicial and administrative action.
I. CALL TO ORDER
Action: Ms. Schwartz called the meeting to order at 8:44 A.M.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Action: The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
III. ROLL CALL
Action: Roll call was taken.
Board members present constituting a quorum: Ms. Schwartz (Chairperson), Mr. Montana
(Vice-Chairperson), Ms. Kelly, Mr. Gil, and Ms. Chael.
Board members absent: None.
City staff present: Ms. Lourdes Cabrera (Senior Planner and Zoning Administrator), and Mr.
Marcus Lightfoot (Zoning Review Coordinator).
Staff members absent: None.
IV. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
There were no administrative matters.
V. REQUESTS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
B) ERPB-14-006
MWL
Applicant: AAA On Time Electric
For: Razzle Dazzle Barbershop
Property Owner: Seven Skies Company, Inc.
Location: 5740 SW 72 Street
Request: Signage Installation
Z:\ERPB\ERPB Minutes\2014 Minutes\February\ERPB Final Regular Meeting Minutes -2-4-2014.docx
Page 1 of2
Applicants Present: Luis Arnaldi
Mr. Lightfoot read the item into the record.
The Chairperson opened the meeting to Public Comments.
There were no comments.
The Chairperson closed the meeting to Public Comments.
Ms. Kelly stated that the sign is extremely large and appears to be out of scale based on the
rendering that was provided. Mr. Gil asked if the size of the sign is comparable to the other signs
on the building. Mr. Lightfoot stated that it is difficult to ascertain, but the subject building does
not have a signage master plan.
Ms. Schwartz stated that the size of the letters of the proposed sign is inconsistent. She also
stated that she was concerned with the location of the barber pole. She stated that it could
possibly be moved closer to the entrance. Ms. Schwartz then stated that the Board would like to
see photographs of the entire block for comparison purposes.
Ms. Cabrera stated that the only business that has a sign on the fascia is Buns & Buns.
Ms. Chae1 stated that the proposed sign overhangs the adjacent store and should be corrected.
Motion: Ms. Kelly motioned to defer the item with the condition that the applicant provides the
Board with additional photographs of the adjacent stores, and provide a revised rendering that is
to scale. Ms. Schwartz seconded the motion.
Vote: Approved: 5 Opposed: 0
Mr. Montana: Yes
Ms. Schwartz: Yes
Mr. Gil: Yes
Ms. Kelly: Yes
Ms. Chae1: Yes
MWL
Z:\ERPB\ERPB Minutes\2014 Minutes\February\ERPB Final Regular Meeting Minutes -2-4-2014.docx
Page 2 of2
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
Environmental Review & Preservation Board
Regular Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, March 18,2014
City Commission Chambers
8:30A.M.
City of South Miami Ordinance No. 08-06-1876 requires all lobbyists before engaging in any lobbying activities
to register with the City Clerk and pay an annual fee of$500 per Ordinance No. 44-08-1979. This applies to all
persons who are retained (whether paid or not) to represent a business entity or organization to influence "City"
action. "City" action is broadly described to include the ranking and selection of professional consultants, and
virtually all-legislative, quasi-judicial and administrative action.
I. CALL TO ORDER
Action: Ms. Schwartz called the meeting to order at 8:41 A.M.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Action: The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
III. ROLL CALL
Action: Roll call was taken.
Board members present constituting a quorum: Ms. Schwartz (Chairperson), Mr. Montana
(Vice-Chairperson), Ms. Chael, Ms. Kelly, and Ms. Yanoshik.
Board members absent: Mr. Gil
City staff present: Ms. Lourdes Cabrera (Senior Planner and Zoning Administrator), and Mr.
Marcus Lightfoot (Zoning Review Coordinator).
Staff members absent: None.
IV. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
No Administrative Matters at this Time
V. REQUESTS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
B) ERPB-14-006
Applicants Present: Luis Arnaldi
Mr. Lightfoot read the item into the record.
MWL
Applicant: AAA On Time Electric
For: Razzle Dazzle Barbershop
Property Owner: Seven Skies Company,
Inc.
Location: 5740 SW 72 Street
Request: Signage Installation
Z:\ERPB\ERPB Minutcs\2014 Minutes\March\ERPB Final Regular Meeting Minutes -3-IS-2014.docx
Page 1 of2
The Chairperson opened the meeting to Public Comments.
There were no comments.
The Chairperson closed the meeting to Public Comments.
Ms. Kelly stated that the proposed drawing does not depict what the actual sign will be.
Ms. Schwartz stated that she would not be receptive to part of the sign being located on the
fascia. She then stated that Razzle Dazzle already has a sign inside the store that has the name of
the business. She then stated that it was a good idea to relocate the barber pole to the entrance.
Staff stated that the sign inside the store would have to be removed since it hasn't been reviewed
by the Board.
Ms. Chae1 stated that she doesn't have an issue with part of the sign being attached to the fascia.
Ms. Chael then asked if the barber pole could be raised, of which Mr. Montana stated that the
pole is already seven feet from the ground.
Mr. Montana stated that he doesn't have an issue with part of the sign being attached to the
fascia. He then stated that he has an issue with the fact that the sign is composed of two (2)
separate signs that creates a disjoint when reading the sign.
The applicant stated that there would be enough room for the sign and that it would be reduced if
it is proven that the sign is too large.
Ms. Chael stated that the sign should fit in the spaces provided based on the dimensions that are
shown if based on site measurements even though the proposed drawing does not represent the
true size of the structure.
Ms. Schwartz asked for a consensus of how the Board felt about the proposed sign. Ms.
Yanoshik stated that she would like to see plans that correctly depict the sign and its relation to
the building.
Ms. Kelly stated that the portion of the sign that says "Barbershop" appears to be larger than the
area over the door.
Motion: Ms. Schwartz motioned to defer the item with the condition that a drawing/picture that
is to scale detailing the correct location of the sign in relation to its surroundings, and staff's
conditions. Ms. Yanoshik seconded the motion.
Vote: Approved: 5 Opposed: 0
Ms. Yanoshik: Yes
Mr. Montana: Yes
Ms. Schwartz: Yes
Ms. Kelly: Yes
Ms. Chae1: Yes
MWL
Z:\ERPB\ERPB Minutes\2014 Minutes\March\ERPB Final Regular Meeting Minutes -3-IS-2014.docx
Page 2 of2
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
Envirollmental Review & Preservation Board
...
Regular Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, April 15,2014
City Commission Chambers
8:30A.M .
City of South Miami Ordinance No. 08-06-1876 requires all lobbyists before engaging in any lobbying activities
to register with the City Clerk and pay an annual fee of$500 per Ordinance No. 44-08-1979. This applies to all
persons who are retained (whether paid or not) to represent a business entity or organization to influence "City"
action. "City" action is broadly described to include the ranking and selection of professional consultants, and
virtually all-legislative, quasi-judicial and administrative action.
I. CALL TO ORDER
Action: Ms. Schwartz called the meeting to order at 8:30 A.M.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Action: The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
III. ROLL CALL
Action: Roll call was taken.
Board members present constituting a quorum: Ms. Schwartz (Chairperson), Ms. Kelly, and
Ms. Yanoshik.
Board members absent: Mr. Montana, Mr. Gil, and Ms. Chae1.
City staff present: Ms. Lourdes Cabrera (Senior Planner and Zoning Administrator), and Mr.
Marcus Lightfoot (Zoning Review Coordinator).
Staff members absent: None.
IV. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
No Administrative Matters at this Time
V. REQUESTS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
C) ERPB-14-006 Applicant: AAA On Time Electric
For: Razzle Dazzle Barbershop
Property Owner: Seven Skies Company, Inc.
Location: 5740 SW 72 Street
Request: Signage Installation
Applicants Present: Luis Arnaldi and Elena Linares
Mr. Lightfoot read the item into the record.
MWL
Z:\ERPB\ERPB Minutes\20 14 Minutes\April\ERPB Final Regular Meeting Minutes -4-15-20 14.docx
Page 1 of2
The Chairperson opened the meeting to Public Comments.
There were no comments.
The Chairperson closed the meeting to Public Comments.
Ms. Kelly stated that even though the plans have been revised, the scale is still incorrect.
Ms. Schwartz stated that there currently is signage for the business. Staff stated that it could be a
condition for approval that all signage be removed. Ms. Schwartz then stated that there should
not be any signage on the fascia of the building.
Ms. Linares stated that she put up the signs in question in order to increase traffic to the business.
By allowing the signage to be placed on the fascia, it would further advertise that her business is
in South Miami.
Ms. Kelly stated that the window area of the storefront could be utilized. Staff read the
regulations for window signage into the record.
The Board discussed the possibility of modifying the configuration for the proposed sign.
Staff suggested that the signage be placed above the black area above the storefront window.
Motion: Ms. Schwartz motioned grant final approval to the item with the condition that the sign
"Razzle Dazzle Barber Shop" be placed above the storefront window that is closest to the
sidewalk, not on the fascia board and staffs conditions. Ms. Kelly seconded the motion.
Vote: Approved: 3 Opposed: 0
Ms. Y anoshik: Yes
Ms. Schwartz: Yes
Ms. Kelly: Yes
MWL
Z:\ERPB\ERPI3 Minutes\20 14 Minutes\April\ERPB Final Regular Meeting Minutes -4-15-2014.docx
Page 2 of2
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
Environmental Review & Preservation Board
Regular Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, July22, 2014
City Commission Chambers
.. 8:30A.M. . ..
City of South Miami Ordinance No. 08-06-1876 requires all lobbyists before engaging in any lobbying activities
to register with the City Clerk and pay an annual fee of $500 per Ordinance No. 44-08-1979. This applies to all
persons who are retained (whether paid or not) to represent a business entity or organization to influence "City"
action. "City" action is broadly described to include the ranking and selection of professional consultants, and
virtually all-legislative, quasi-judicial and administrative action.
I. CALL TO ORDER
Action: Ms. Schwartz called the meeting to order at 8:33A.M.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Action: The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
III. ROLL CALL
Action: Roll call was taken.
Board members present constituting a quorum: Ms. Schwartz (Chairperson), Mr. Montana
(Vice Chairperson), Mr. Gil, Ms. Chael, Mr. Corral, & Mr. Morales.
Board members absent: Ms. Kelly and Ms. Yanoshik.
City staff present: Ms. Lourdes Cabrera (Senior Planner and Zoning Administrator) & Marcus
Lightfoot (Zoning Review Coordinator).
Staff members absent: None.
IV. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
None at this time.
V. REQUESTS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
E) ERPB-14-006
MWL
Applicant: Razzle Dazzle Barbershop
For: Razzle Dazzle Barbershop
Property Owner: Seven Skies Company,
Inc.
Location: 5740 SW 72 Street
Request: Signage Installation
Z:\ERPB\ERPB Minutes\2014 Minutes\.luly\ERPB Final Regular Meeting Minutes -7-22-2014.docx
Page 1 of3
Applicants Present: Elena Linares
Mr. Lightfoot read the item into the record.
The Chairperson opened the meeting to Public Comments.
There were no comments.
The Chairperson closed the meeting to Public Comments.
Ms. Schwartz asked if the neon sign was removed, of which Ms. Linares stated yes.
Mr. Morales asked if the sign being proposed at this time was already signed, of which staff
stated yes.
Ms. Schwartz gave a brief history on the item.
Ms. Linares presented her item to the Board.
Mr. Morales stated that the sign cannot be considered a flat sign anymore due to how it is
anchored to the building.
The Board discussed the design of the sign and the fact that a portion of it is not attached to the
wall.
Ms. Linares stated that there are anchors supporting the sign due to the awkward design of the
storefront.
Mr. Gil asked staff about the thickness of the sIgn, of which Mr. Lightfoot responded that
dimensions of for depth of the sign were not provided.
Motion: Mr. Corral motioned to deny the application so that the applicant could design a new
sign and present it to the ERPB for review and approval. Mr. Montana seconded the motion.
Mr. Corral clarified that if the item is denied, the original design that was approved at the April
15,2014 ERPB meeting could be still be used.
Ms. Linares asked if the item could be approved with the condition that the sign be brought up to
code, of which Mr. Corral stated no. Mr. Morales added that the item could also be deferred so
that the issue with the sign could be addressed.
Mr. Montana and Ms. Chaelleft the meeting.
Vote: Approved: 0 Opposed: 6
Mr. Corral: No
Mr. Morales: No
Mr. Montana: Absent
Ms. Schwartz: No
Mr. Gil: No
MWL
Z:\ERPB\ERPB Minutes\2014 Minutes\.July\ERPB Final Regular Meeting Minutes -7-22-2014.docx
Page 2 of3
Ms. Chae1: Absent
Motion: Mr. Morales motioned to defer the application so that the applicant work with the sign
company to corne up with a design that attaches back to the storefront. Mr. Corral seconded the
motion.
Vote: Approved: 4 Opposed: 0
Mr. Corral: Yes
Mr. Morales: Yes
Mr. Montana: Absent
Ms. Schwartz: Yes
Mr. Gil: Yes
Ms. Chael: Absent
MWL
Z:\ERPB\ERPB Minutes\2014 Minutes\.!uly\ERPB Final Regular Meeting Minutes -7-22-2014.docx
Page30f3
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
Environmental Review & Preservation Board
Regular Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, October 7, 2014
City Commission Chambers
8:30 AM
City of South Miami Ordinance No. 08-06-1876 requires all lobbyists before engaging in any lobbying
activities to register with the City Clerk and pay an annual fee of $500 per Ordinance No. 44-08-1979. This
applies to all persons who are retained (whether paid or not) to represent a business entity or organization to
influence "City" action. "City" action is broadly described to include the ranking and selection of
professional consultants, and virtually all-legislative, quasi-judicial and administrative action.
I. Call to Order
II. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag
III. Roll Call
Board Members present constituting a quorum: Mr. Corral, Ms. Yanoshik, Mr. Morales, Mr.
Montana (Vice-Chairperson), Ms. Kelly, Ms. Chael,
Board Members absent Ms. Schwartz (Chairperson), Mr. Gil
City staff present: Ms. Lourdes Cabrera (Senior Planner and Zoning Administrator), Mr.
Marcus Lightfoot (Zoning Review Coordinator)
IV. Requests are as follows: [Note: following the presentation of a case the Board
Chair will open public comment on the item to interested parties] ---Quasi-
Judicial Warning: The following matter is considered to be quasi-judicial and you
may not have any ex parte communication, whether verbal or in writing, with
anyone until the quasi-judicial matter is resolved and the meeting is adjourned.
You are advised to review the full warning that can be found at the end of this
agenda.
ill ERPB-14-006 -Applicant: Razzle Dazzle Barbershop -For: Razzle Dazzle
Barbershop -Property Owner: Seven Skies Company, Inc. -Location: 5740 SW
72 Street -Request: Signage Installation
Applicant's Present: Elena Linares and Robert Katzman
Mr. Lightfoot read the item into the record.
Page 1 of 10
The Chairperson opened the meeting to Public Comments.
There were no comments.
The Chairperson closed the meeting to Public Comments.
The Board reviewed the proposed plans for the project.
Ms. Chae1 voiced her concern that if the sign was mounted just to the drywall, then it may not be
structurally sound. She then suggested that someone inspect the sign to insure that it is correctly
mounted to the building. Staff stated that if the Board were to approve the application, the
building inspector would inspect the sign to ensure that it complies with the Florida Building
Code.
Ms. Kelly stated that the sign that was approved by the Board was a sign that only sits above the
storefront window, and does not cover the entire length of the storefront. Mr. Morales added that
the barber pole is positioned near the door, below the sign which is not the correct location.
Mr. Katzman stated that he is waiting to get approval from the Board in order to pull the
necessary permits in order to correct the violations.
When asked why the sign wasn't taken down if it wasn't approved, Ms. Linares stated that she
was waiting to see if the sign was going to be approved by the ERPB.
Ms. Linares gave background information on how the sign was installed.
Ms. Kelly stated that the sign that was approved by the Board was half the size of the sign that
was actually installed.
Motion: Mr. Morales made a motion to deny the application based on all of the discussion that
was held. Ms. Kelly seconded the motion.
Vote: Aye: 5; Nay: 1 (Ms. Chae1)
Page 2 of 10