Ord. No. 24-95-1597ORDINANCE'NO. 24-95-1597
WHEREAS, on January 18, 1989, the City Commission of the City
of South Miami adopted the South Miami Comprehensive Plan, in
accordance with Chapter 163, Part II, F.S. , and Chapter, 9J-5,
F.A.C.; and,
WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission desire to accept,
ratify and adopt the recommendations of the Planning Board
regarding the Evaluation & Appraisal Report.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The Evaluation & Appraisal Report dated
November 21, 1995, and prepared by the Building, zoning & Community
Development Department is hereby adopted as the official 1995
r-,,AR Adoption Ordinance Page # 2
Evaluation & Appraisal Report of the South Miami Comprehensive Plan
for the 1989-1994 Planning cycle including changes set forth in
-
®.M . - - - . . . Z, I — I . - - , - - --
--
READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY
c:\wpdocs\eay95\ear-1995.ord
jP CARVER
kjrjyn
NTA I/
NAY
YOUNG
Yr-A
BASS
yuk
COOPER
YEA,---
C4jmMISSIONER CUNNINGHAM
YEA
ORDINANCE AN OF MAYOR , CITY COMMISSION OF OF SOUTH • r
ADOPTING THE OFFICIAL 1995 EVALUATION r APPRAISAL REPORT OF t
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE 1989-1994 PLANNING CYCLE; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES
CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
On August 29, 1995, the Planning Board voted 5:0 to recommend the transmittal of the EA
document to the City Commission and the Department of • ' D • includi s
modifications • language • f "Community Goals" • • r. • •'
Proposed changes to Community Goals language by the Planning Board, modifications propose
by staff is response i D ' comments any •'' by •I • be incorporated
into a final document, to be dated November 21, 1995, which will to be transmitted to DCA.
From: Brian T. Soltz Re Evaluation and Appraisal Report
Planning Technician Post DCA Preliminary Review
via Bill Mackey, Planner
9
r , ,
WE VALUE OUR • DIVERSE NEIGHBORHOODS, OUR r i
OUR •r ERN MEDICAL COMMUNITY AND OUR •
OUR :•' ,•it S, SUPPORT OUR i • DISTRICT, r ENCOURAGE DEVELOPMENT OF
OUR URBAN CORE LINK TO THE METRORAIL TRANSIT STATION IN A MANNER THAT ENHANCES OUR
COMMUNITY AND IMPROVES OUR TAX BASE.
Provide clear and easily understood land use designations in the Comprehensive Plan.
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT i
i�
2 lanes to 4
S. W. 67 Avenue S.W. 40 St. to 76 St. Intersection improvements 1995 -96
and drainage
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL -
EVALUATION AND A PPRA ISAL REPORT III - B - 27
v
co
cn
LO
Z MJ
1}m
CV
LL
H
LL
460
E
W
0 N
ON
3
-
®�
+. 4
co
f-
®t1
•`
U
Z� o
v aci
a
U.
�.m`
•a U
0 O
N� ,' C
L
Mm
> o ®
o
u_
Q ?'
L
cm
Q N N
VJ
LU
EVALUATION AND A PPRA ISAL REPORT III - B - 27
v
cn
Z MJ
1}m
460
E
U C
0 N
ON
3
-
®�
+. 4
co
f-
®t1
•`
Z� o
v aci
a
F c
°�
�.m`
•a U
0 O
N� ,' C
L
2
`
> o ®
o
u_
Q ?'
L
Q N N
VJ
a
i
i
i
i
�
•
i
1
is
r
i
�
•
i
r
t
.
1
,
1
EVALUATION AND A PPRA ISAL REPORT III - B - 27
v
cn
Z MJ
1}m
460
E
U C
0 N
ON
3
-
®�
+. 4
co
f-
®t1
•`
Z� o
v aci
a
F c
°�
�.m`
•a U
0 O
N� ,' C
L
2
`
> o ®
o
u_
Q ?'
L
Q N N
VJ
q
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT III - B - 28
Cl
U)
z
0
A)
I--
25
z
0
C.)
T7
U.
C14
LL
-:3
0
a)
z
0)
V-TT
ui
a)
0
E 0
0
LL
a 0
CL
0
w
C.)
CL
a
z
P
U)
R
E D .2
ui
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT III - B - 28
Cl
A)
M
E =
-:3
0
a)
U)
4-
0)
V-TT
0
a)
E 0
cry�V®®
a 0
CL
E
ca
E D .2
> 0 E o
U-
CL
2
0
5
T'his section of the report dliscilssPs the need for plan amendments to implement the results of the
Evaluation & Appraiol Report. Some. of these amendments comprise of new issues not
necessitated by the Evaluation & Appraisal Report results, but do comprise the future vision of
the City. The proposed amendments are identified in the section below:
Transportation Oriented Development District (TODD)
This comprehensive plan amendment will include policies and objectives to encourage
development of this district. The location of this district will be included as part of the Future
Land Use Map (Attachment F).
Transportation Element
This new element will replace the existing traffic circulation element. The City does not expect
any major problems in development of this element since there no airports Or seaports within the
boundaries of the City.
Future Land Use Map and Categories
This comprehensive plan amendment is based upon the finding of the report and the new vision
♦ the City. 7-he section titled Future Condition Maps describes the changes that are proposed
for the maps and the categories.
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT V1 - 2 9
SCHEDULE OF PROPOSED PLAN AMENDMENT I
Red
,evelopment, and Infill. District (RID) Amendment
oThis qniendment Will be transmitted to the Department of Community Affairs simultaneouMy
with the adopted version of the Evaluation and Appraisal Report. (December 1, 1995)
Transportation Oriented Development District (TODD) Amendment
'Mis amendment will be transmitted to the Department of Community Affairs simultaneously
with the adopted version of the Evaluation and Appraisal Report. (December 1, 1995)
New Intergovernmental Coordination Element Amendment
This amendment will be adopted in accordance with the rules and regulations of Florida Statutes
and Florida Administrative Code.
New Transportation Element Amendment
The amendment will be transmitted in the middle • 1996 and adopted • December 1, 1991
Future Land Use Map and Categories Amendment
The amendment will be transmitted in the middle of 1996 and adopted by December 1, 1996.
General Text Amendments
The amendment will be transmitted in the middle of 1996 and adopted by December 1, 1996.
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT VI - 4 7
M I N U T E S
P L A N N I_ G B 0 A R D
PRESENT ABSENT
J. Lefley C. Thorner
S. Basu 0. Kerr
G. Illas
K. Zeller
P. Eisenhart
Also present: bean Mimms, 8ZCD DirectorF4 Bill Mackey, Planner
Brian Soltz, Planning Technician; David Struder, Secretary. I
Ms. Zeller read the request.
Staff proceeded with their presentation to the Board, which
concerned proposed changes to the City's Future Land Use Map.
I
Mr. Michael Milleri 6796 SW 62 Avenue, urged the City to
establish zoning that would permit small businesses to be located
along SW 62 Avenue, particularly near the intersection with SW 64
Street. Mr. Miller opined that such a-change would encourage
growth and speed improvement along SW 62 Avenue.
Mr. David Tucker Sr., 6556 SW 78 Terrace, spoke of the importance
for czens to be involved in their community, particularly
during a consequential undertaking such as the EAR process.
Public hearing was closed.
Upon Mr. Basuls inquiry, staff elaborated on agenda item numbes
PB-95-012, Redevelopment and Infill District Amendment, which
would establ sh a transportation concurrency management area i
South Miami, as elucidated in the Board's information packet4 I
Mr. Basu directed the 86ard0s attention to Page 1 of the
Evaluation and Appraisal Report, the page that contains "Future
ons" and "Community Goals". Mr. Basu and Mr. Eisenhart
suggested several changes to the language comprising the
Community Goals section, changes which staff agreed to make.
The Board then discussed several properties included inj
surrounding the boundaries of, the TODD,
Mr. Eisenhart'suggested expanding the boundaries of the TODD, by
including several blocks at or near the Hotel Vila And the South
Miami post office. Mr. Eisenhart expressed concern that these
particular areas may be excluded from any benefits Achieved by
the TODD designation.
PB Min 8/29/95 2
I
Staff confirmed for the Board that the language contained in the
TODD regarding eight stories allows the potential for, and does
not quarantee the developme of, buildings hznzing that I-A-,ight
(.e. d�, attachment F. 11-8 St tL' 4- �i
ories Heigh imitation, n�secr-Jbn VI
[TODD] of the EAR).
Enszffr- -r
Mr. David Tucker, St. spoke once again before the Board. Mr.
Tucker stated that the Cityj with its current Charrette n review
process, must carefully consider the uses that will be put to the
areas covered under this review.
Mr. Michael Miller also spoke again before the Board. Mr. Miller
thanked the City for all its efforts undertaken with the EAR
process.
Public hearing was closed a second time
Following further discussion of the properties surrounding the
TODD, Mr. Lefley opened the floor for a motion.
Motion: Mr. Basu moved to approve the transmittal of the EAR
document to the City Commission and to the Florida DCA, inclusive
of the modcations to the language, as suggested • the Board,
contained in the "Community Goals" section • Page i • the
document. Ms. Zeller seconded the motion.
Vote: Approved: 5 opposed: 0
(The Board recessed At 9.*30 1 PM and reconvened At 5i.40 PM.)
Motion: Mt. Eisenhart moved to amend the EAR to include Blocks 14
and 15 of the Townsite of Larkins, and Blocks 2 and 3 of the
Rosswood subdivision, in the TODD; and such inclusion shall •
shown on the new Future Land Use'map logend4
9