Loading...
Ord. No. 16-01-1747ORDINANCE NO.16-01-1747 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,FLORIDA,RELATING TO A REQUEST TO AMEND LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 20-3.3(E)ENTITLED "OUTDOOR SEATING/DINING FOR ALL COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, EXCEPT FOR PROPERTIES IN THE RO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE ZONING DISTRICT."AND SECTION 20-7.29 ENTITLED "OUTDOOR SEATING/DINING USES AND AREAS"IN ORDER TO AMEND THE REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO OUTDOOR SEATING FOR RESTAURANTS;PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT;AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,thePlanningandZoningDepartmenthasinitiatedaprogramtoupdate,clarify, andimprovetheprovisions of the City's LandDevelopmentCodeandtoupdateprovisions of theCity'sLand Development Code;and WHEREAS the Planning Boardhasexpressedconcernthatthecurrentstandardsgoverning outdoorseating/diningareasforrestaurants,containedinLand Development CodeSection20- 3.3(E),andSection20-7.29both require additional standardsinordertolimitthenumberand location of seating,require aspecificwidth of unobstructed pedestrian passage;to require maintenanceandcleaning of outdoorseatingareas;toprotectpedestriansfrominjury;andto requireinsuranceandaholdharmlessclause;and WHEREAS,the Planning andZoning Department hasreviewedthesubject regulations and has prepared anordinanceamendingLDCSection 20-3.3(E)andLDCSection20-7.29inorderto providetheadditional requirements and standards;and WHEREAS,atitsMay29,2001 meeting,afterpublic hearing regarding the proposed amendmentstoSections 20-3.3(E)and20-7.29 of theLandDevelopmentCode,the Planning Boardvoted5-2to recommend approval of the proposed amendments totheCity Commission; and WHEREAS,theCity Commission desires toacceptthe recommendations of the Planning Board and enact the aforesaid amendments. NOW,THEREFORE,BEIT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,FLORIDA: Section 1.That Section 20-3.3(E)of theSouthMiamiLand Development Codeis herebyamendedtoreadasfollows: Section 20-3.3 Permitted Use Schedule (E)Outdoor Seating/Dining forAll Commercial Properties,except for Properties in the RO Residential Office Zoning District (1)An applicationmustbefiled,which shallincludelayout of alltables,chairs,benches,andother furniture;pedestrian ingressandegress;location of refuse containers;andother elements necessarytoillustratetheproposedoutdoor seating/dining useandarea(alldrawingsmustbe titled,indicateorientation,andbeatanacceptablescale). (2) (2)Outdoorseating/diningareasanduses of thepublicright-of-way and/or anyprivatepropertymay be approved,denied,orapprovedwithconditions,modifications,safeguards,orstipulations appropriatelyandreasonablyrelatedtotheintent,purposes,standards,and requirements of the relatedregulationsbytheCityManager.Suchpermitshallnotbetransferableinanymannerand is strictly aconditionaluse permit,issuedforaperiod of oneyear,renewableannuallyvia payment of theannual occupational licensefeeforsuchoutdoorseating/dininguses. (3)The feeforoutdoordining/seatinguseandareawillbewaivedforthe first year of operation,and shallbechargedannuallyintheamount of twohundredfiftydollars($250.00);thepermitfee shallbeaddedtotheoccupationallicensefeeforthemainbusiness. (4)The applicantshallprovidean indemnity agreementthatisacceptabletothecitymanager.This agreement will include specification of liabilityinsurance provided. (5)The conditionalusepermitting of outdoorseating/dininguseandareamayberevokedbythecity manageruponfindingthatoneormoreconditions of theseregulationshavebeenviolated,orthat theoutdoorseating/diningareaandusearebeingoperatedinamannerthatconstitutesapublic nuisance,orinanywaythatconstitutesareasonablerisk of potentialliabilitytothecity. (6)Outdoor seating/dining useandareamaybetemporarilysuspendedbythecitymanagerforpublic use/purpose,utility,sidewalkorroad repairs,emergencysituations,orviolations of provisions containedherein.Thelengtli of suspensionshallbedeterminedbythecitymanagerasnecessary. Removal of allstreetfurnitureandrelatedobstructionsshallbetheresponsibility of the owner/operator of theoutdoor seating/dining. (7)Outdoorseating/dining area shallbekeptinaneatandorderly appearance andshallbekept free fromrefuseanddebris.Theapplicantshallberesponsiblefordailycleaningandsweeping of the outdoor seating/dining area and for the cleanliness and maintenance of any outdoor planters immediately adjacent to the outdoor seating/dining area.Cleaning shall include twice-monthly pressure cleaningorother appropriate cleaning methods,asdeterminedbvthe Citv.Use of City sidewalksfortrashand garbage removalshallbeprohibited. (8)Outdoorseating/dininguseand area shallnot interfere withthefreeand unobstructed pedestrian or vehicularcirculation of traffic,publicaccesstoanystreetintersections,crosswalks,publicseating areasandconveniences,busstops,alleys,serviceeasements,handicapfacilities,oraccesstoany other commercial establishments.The width andlocation of the sidewalk pedestrian passageshall be as follows:isto bo determined bv the city's planning division. a)If thereisseatingononeside of the sidewalk,a minimum of five (5)feet of sidewalkmust remain clearand unobstructed forpedestrianpassage: b)If thereis seating ontwosides of the sidewalk,a minimum of six (6)feet of sidewalk between thetwoseatingareasmustremainclearandunobstructedforpedestrianpassage." c)All tables,chairs and umbrellas shallbe located a minimum of 18 inches from the curb. (9)Outdoor seating/dining areaonthepublic rights-of-way shallbeopenand un-enclosed.No building structures of any kind shallbeallowedinandoveranyportion of theoutdoor seating/dining arealocatedonpublicproperty. (3) (10)Tables,chairsandallotherfurnitureusedintheoperationofanoutdoor seating/dining areaonthe publicrights-of-wayshallnotbeanchoredorrestrainedinanymanner.Individualtableumbrellas, planters,orothersuchnon-stationaryelementsmaybepermittedwithintheoutdoorseating/dining area and where applicable,shall have a minimum clearance height of seven (7)feet above the sidewalk. (11)Outdoor seating/dining useandareaonpublicrights-of-wayshallberestrictedtothelengthofthe sidewalkorpublic right-of-way immediately frontingthecafeorotherestablishment.The utilization of spaceextending on-ekhef oneadjacentsidebeyondthesubjectpropertyfrontage maybeauthorizedsubjecttoannualwrittenconsentprovidedbythepropertyownersinfrontof whose properties theoutdoor seating/dining servicewouldoccur.The annual written consent form shallbeprovidedtotheCitvandshallincludean insurance policy naming theCitvas co-insured and a hold harmless clause in favor of the Citv. (12)Outdoor seating/dining areashallbeatthesame elevation asthe adjoining sidewalkorpublic right-of-way. (13)Cartsandtraysforservingfoodarepermittedintheoutdoor seating/dining area. (14)Outdoor seating/dining useandareashallnotbeprovidedwithamplifiedsoundofanykind. (15)The maximum number of outdoor seats shall not exceed 80%of the number of indoor seating, except for restaurants with indoor seating of 25seatsor less,which mayhave outdoor seats notto exceed 100%of Uie number of indoor seats. Section 2 That Section 20-7.29 of theSouthMiamiLand Development Codeishereby amended to read as follows: Hometown District Overlay Zone Section 20-7.29 Outdoor seating/dining uses and areas. (A)An application maybeacceptedforanyproposedsitingofoutdoor seating/dining usesandareasforany propertywithintheHometownDistrict,including,butnotlimitedto,thoseareaswhicharedesignatedas pre-approved on die Regulating Plan.An application mustbefiled,which shallincludethelayoutofall tables,chairs,benchesandotherfurniture;pedestrianingressandegress;locationofrefusecontainers;and other elements necessaryto illustrate theproposedoutdoor seating/dining use and area (all drawings must betitled,indicate orientation,andbeatanacceptablescale). (B)Outdoor seating/dining areasandusesofthepublicright-of-way and/or anyprivatepropertymaybe approved,denied,or approved withconditions,modifications,safeguards or stipulations appropriately and reasonablyrelatedtothe intent,purposes,standards and requirements of the related regulations,bytheCity Manager.Such permit shallnotbe transferable inanymanner,andis strictly a conditional use permit, issuedforaperiodofoneyear,renewableannuallyviapaymentoftheannualoccupationallicensefeefor the outdoor seating/dining use. (C)Thefeeforoutdoordining/seatingusesandareas will bewaivedforthefirstyearofoperationofthe subjectproperty,andshallbe charged annually inthe amount of $250;the permit feeshallbeaddedtothe occupational license feeforthemainbusiness. (D)TheapplicantshallprovideanIndemnityAgreement,whichisacceptabletotheCityManager.This agreement willincludespecificationofliabilityinsuranceprovided. (4) (E)The conditional use permitting of outdoor seating/dining usesandareasmayberevokedbytheCity Manageruponfindingthatoneormoreconditions of theseregulationshavebeenviolated,orthatthe outdoor seating/dining areaandusearebeingoperatedina manner which constitutes apublicnuisance,or inanyway constitutes areasonablerisk of potentialliabilitytotheCity. (F)Outdoor seating/dining usesandareasmaybetemporarilysuspendedbytheCityManagerforpublic use/purpose,utility,sidewalkorroad repairs,emergencysituationsorviolations of provisionscontained herein.Thelength of suspensionshallbedetenninedbytheCityManagerasnecessary.Removal of all streetfurnitureandrelatedobstructionsshallbetheresponsibility of theowner/operator of theoutdoor seating/dining. (G)Outdoorseating/dining areas shallbekeptinaneatandorderly appearance andshallbekeptfreefrom refuse and debris.The applicant shall be responsible for daily cleaning and sweeping of the outdoor seating/dining area and for the cleanliness and maintenance of any outdoor planters immediately adjacent to the outdoor seating/dining area.Cleaning shall include twice-monthly pressure cleaning or other appropriate cleaning methods,as determined bv the Citv.Use of Citv sidewalks for trash and garbage removalshallbeprohibited. (H)Outdoor seating/dining usesand areas shall not interfere withthe free and unobstructed pedestrian or vehicular circulation of traffic,public access toany street intersections,crosswalks,public seating areas and conveniences,busstops,alleys,service easements,handicap facilities or access to commercial establishments.Thewidthandlocation of thesidewalkpedestrianpassageshallbeas follows:istobo determinedbythe Building,Zoning and Community DovolopmontDepartment. (a)Ifthereis seating ononesideofthe sidewalk,aminimumoffive (5)feet of sidewalk must remain clear and unobstructed for pedestrian passage: (b)If there is seating ontwo sides ofthe sidewalk,a minimum ofsix (6)feet of sidewalk between the two seating areas must remain clear and unobstructed for pedestrian passage." (c)All tables,chairsand umbrellas shallbe located aminimum of 18inchesfromthe curb. (I)Outdoor seating/dining areas shall beopenand unenclosed.Nobuilding structures ofanykind shall be allowedinandoveranyportionofthe outdoor seating/dining area located onpublic property,exceptas allowedbySections20-7.7through 20-7.11. (J)Tables,chairsandallother furniture usedinthe operation ofanoutdoorseating/diningareashallnotbe anchored or restrained inany manner.Individual table umbrellas,planters orothersuch non-stationary elements maybe permitted withinthe outdoor seating/dining area,andwhere applicable,shall havea minimum clearance height of seven (7)feet above the sidewalk. (K)Outdoorseating/diningusesand areas shallbe restricted tothelength of thesidewalkorpublicright-of- wayimmediatelyfrontingthecafeand/or restaurant establishment.Theutilization of spaceextendingon eitherone adjacent sidebeyondthe subject property frontage maybeauthorizedsubjecttoannualwritten consentprovidedbythe property ownersinfrontofwhose properties theoutdoorseating/diningservice wouldoccur.TheannualwrittenconsentformshallbeprovidedtotheCitvandshallincludean insurance policy naming the Citv as co-insured and a hold harmless clause in favor of the Citv. (5) (L)Outdoor seating/dining areas shallbeatthesame elevation asthe adjoining sidewalk orpublicright-of- way. (M)Cartsandtraysforservingfoodarepermittedintheoutdoor seating/dining area. (N)Outdoor seating/dining usesandareashallnotbe provided withamplifiedsoundofanykind. (O)The maximum number of outdoor scats shallnotexceed 80%of the number of indoor seating,except for restaurants with indoor seating of 25 seats or less,which mayhave outdoor seats notto exceed 100%of the number of indoor seats. Section3 If anysection,clause,sentence,orphrase of thisordinanceisforanyreason held invalid orunconstitutionalbyacourt of competentjurisdiction,thisholdingshallnotaffectthevalidity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 4Allordinancesorparts of ordinancesinconflictwiththeprovisions of thisordinanceare hereby repealed. Section 5This ordinance shalltakeeffectimmediately after adoption hereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of July.2001 ATTEST: CITY CLERK 1st Reading-6/12/01 2nd Reading -7/24/01 (as amended) READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: <£>-^xf/^A- CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED: MAYOR COMMISSION VOTE:5-0 Mayor Robaina:Yea Vice Mayor Feliu:Yea Commissioner Russell :Yea Commissioner Bethel :Yea Commissioner Wiscombe:Yea NOTE:New wording underlined;wording toberemoved indicated by strike-through. '^<:,s< South Miami All-America City 2001 Excellence,Integrity,Inclusion MEMORANDUM To:Honorable Mayor,Vice Mayor Date:July 24,2001 and City Commission From:Charles D.Scurr /i/J fl \Qfi##1 Re:Agenda Item # City Manager /H^J/ffio LDC Amendment:Outdoor Seating for Restaurants REQUEST: (3 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,FLORIDA,RELATING TO A REQUEST TO AMEND LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 20-3J(E)ENTITLED "OUTDOOR SEATING/DINING FOR ALL COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, EXCEPT FOR PROPERTIES IN THE RO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE ZONING DISTRICT."AND SECTION 20-7.29 ENTITLED "OUTDOOR SEATING/DINING USES AND AREAS"IN ORDER TO AMEND THE REQUIREMENTS ANDSTANDARDS APPLICABLE TO OUTDOOR SEATING FOR RESTAURANTS;PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT;AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BACKGROUND The Planning Board atits January 30,2001 requested staffto prepare an appropriate draft amendment tothe LDC regulations governing outdoor seating/dining.The issue was discussed as part ofa special use application for a restaurant proposed for the Shops of Sunset.The primary concern of the Board dealt withthe encroachment of outdoor restaurant tables and chairs on publicsidewalksblockingpedestrianpassage. The regulations governing outdoor seating/dining are contained in Section 20-3.3(E)entitled "Outdoor Seating/Dining for All Commercial Properties except for Properties in the RO Residential Office Zoning Districf\Attachment)and in the Hometown Zoning Overlay District LDC Amendment -Outdoor seating July24,2001 Page! chapter (Section 20-7.29).The regulations in both sections are comprehensive,and require adherence to a number of restrictive standards. PLANNING BOARD CONCERNS Planning Department staff prepared a draft ordinance for consideration by the Planning Board addressing the initial concern,which dealt with the section of the Outdoor Seating regulations requiring a specific width of unobstructed passage for pedestrian sidewalk passage.The current regulations in both sections provide that "The width and location of the passage is to be determined bythe city's planning division"(Section 20-3.3 (E)(8)). The Planning Department's recommended draft would amend the provision to clearly indicate thatthereshallbefive(5)feet of unobstructed sidewalk passageforasinglerow of seatingand six (6)feet of unobstructed sidewalk passage betweentworows of seating.ThePlanning Department's suggestion was based upon the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirement ofa clear path of five (5)feet,to accommodate wheelchairs.Where there is only one row of seating,the five foot clear path will remain adequate.However,when there are two opposite rows of seating,there has been a tendency for some of the restaurant patrons to move their chairs out,or lean back occasionally,reducing the passageway to less than five feet. Therefore,the six (6)foot width is appropriate where there are two rows of seating. The Planning Board at its May 29,2001 meeting conducted a public hearing on the proposed amendment to the LDC provisions regulating outdoor seating/dining for restaurants (Section 20- 3.3(E)and Section 20-7.29).The Planning Board felt that the provision described above should be amended to require five (5)feet unobstructed sidewalk passage,and that onlv one row of seating against the building would be allowed.Specifically.Board members expressed concern withoutdoorrestaurantsthathadseatingonbothsides of thepedestrianwalkway.Itwasseenas creating too much ofa private atmosphere for diners only,and as unfriendly towards pedestrians walkingthrough. Planning Department staff recommended against such a limitation,because of concern that the limitation of outdoor seating to only one side is not appropriate.Certain areas will have sufficient space to accommodate seating on both sides of the sidewalk,and restaurants with this type of seating havebeenvery successful. In addition to the above,the Board expressed concern that other regulations governing outdoor seating needed to be amended.The Board felt that there should be a limit on the number of outdoor dining seats,a minimum height of table umbrellas,and a limitation on the provision allowing outdoor seating to extend to the properties on both sides of the restaurant.The Board also felt thatthe written consent required of adjacent property should include an insurance requirement and a hold harmless clause.These additional proposals are generally supported by PlanningDepartmentstaff. LDCAmendment -Outdoor seating July24,2001 Page 3 PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION At the May 29,2001 Planning Board meeting a motion was made to approve the following proposed amendments to Section 20-3.3(E)and Section 20-7.29,pertaining to outdoor seating/dining for restaurants: •that seating be on one side of the sidewalk ONLY,abutting the building,with a minimum of five (5)feetof sidewalk unobstructed for pedestrian passage; •maximumnumber of outdoorseatsshallnotexceed80%of indoorseating; •table umbrellas should have a minimum clearance height ofseven(7)feet above the sidewalk. •the extension of outdoor seating shall be limited to the frontage of only one adjacent storefront; •the written consent provided by property owners in front of whose properties outdoor seating /dining service occurs shall include an insurance policy naming the City as co-insured and a hold harmless clause in favor of the City. The motion was made by Mr.Comendeiro and seconded by Mr.Morton.The motion was adopted by a vote of5 ayes (Mr.Liddy),Mr.Illas,Ms.Chimelis,Ms.Gibson,Mr.Comendeiro) and2nays (Mr.Mann,Mr.Morton) CITY COMMISSION ACTION (1st Reading ) The Commission at first reading on June 12,2001 adopted the attached ordinance which contains the proposed amendments listed above,for both sections ofthe Land Development Code dealing with outdoor seating/dining.The City Commission,at that time,also suggested an amendment requiring the applicant to clean and sweep the sidewalk dining area on a daily basis.This amendment is included in subsection (7)on p.2 and (G)on p.4.All ofthe amendments can be seen in subsections (7),(8),(10),(11),and (15)on pp.2,3 and in subsections (G),(H),(J),(K), and (O)onpp.4,5. Note that the ordinance adopted on first reading contains both ALTERNATE wording (A and B)for subsection amendment (8)on p.2 and subsection (H)on p.4.Alternate A is the recommendation of the Planning Board,and Alternate Bis the recommendation of Planning Department staff.The City Commission determined that it would decide between the two alternatives at second reading. RECOMMENDATION Itis recommended that the ordinance adopted on second reading contain the ALTERNATE B wording for subsection (8)on p.2 and subsection (H)on p.4,allowing for two rows of seats with 5 feet (if single row)and 6 feet (if two rows)of unobstructed pedestrian passage be included in the adopted ordinance.The absolute limitation of outdoor seating to one row of seats as recommended by the Planning Board is not necessary,and could artificially limit outdoor LDC Amendment -Outdoor seating July24,2001 Page 4 seating in certain locations.The concept of outdoor seating is a vital ingredient to the ambiance and success of the City's downtown streetscape. The Administration is supportive of the other amendments (subsections (10),(11),and (15)on pp.2,3 and subsections (J),(K),and (O)on pp.4,5)as recommended by the Planning Board.These amendments will provide additional limitations and safeguards without affecting the purpose or implementation ofthe outdoor seating regulations. Attachments: ProposedOrdinance PlanningBoardMinutes 5-29-01 Public Notices CS/RGL/SA\K/y D:\Comm Items\2001\7-24-01\Staff Report-Outdoor seating.doc CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING BOARD Regular Meeting Action Summary Minutes Tuesday,May 29,2001 City Commission Chambers 7:30 P.M. I.Call to Order and the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag Action:The meeting was called toorderat7:35P.M. Action:ThePledge of Allegiance wasrecitedinunison. II.Roll Call. Action:Mr.Morton performed rollcall. Board members present constituting a quorum:Mr.Liddy,Mr.Mann,Mr.Illas,Mr. Morton,Ms.Chimelis,Mr.Juan Comendeiro,Ms.Gibson. Citystaff present:SubrataBasu (ACM),Richard G.Lorber (Planning Director),Sandy Youkilis,(Planning Consultant),Luis Figueredo,(City Attorney),andMariaM. Menendez (Board Secretary). III.Special Notice Before opening thepublic hearing,Mr.Morton announced thatthe applicant of ShoalCreekPropertiesL.L.C.,foraproposedrentalapartmentbuildingatthe northeast corner of SW 70th Street and SW 61st Avenue,had requested a deferral of theitemuntilarevisedapplicationcouldbesubmitted.Staff announcedthatthis item is being tentatively scheduled for the Planning Board meeting of July 10*, 2001.Properpublicationofsuch notice willtakeplacepriortothe meeting date. IV.Public Hearing (A)PB-01-004 Applicant:AT&T Wireless Services Request:A RESOLUTION OFTHE MAYOR ANDTHECITY COMMISSION OFTHE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI RELATING TO A REQUEST PURSUANT TO SECTION 20-10.6 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR SPECIAL USE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A STEALTH CELLULAR Planning Board Meeting May 29,2001 ^MMirMir-ATTONS FACILITY (FLAGPOLE)ON THE YMCA PROPERTY LOCATEDCOMMUNICATIONS^ACI1LrTY;(hLA ^^^^^^/^.^,0^ ZONING DISTRICT, Action-Ms.Chimelis read the request into the record and staff presented thefeaueTt'Riving an overview of the proposal,indicating that the present request is aevUionoftheoriginalproposal.The applicant's original submission showed the he,ghtrfXoSELtobe87feet.At that time,staff expressed the concern that the££of Ihe antenna was excessive and could not be screened from view by existingSfinaSS3fw"also concerned about the electrical equipment bui ding -th a toted v^re topped screen fence located within a few feet of recreational facilities forcwSnTherefore,due to the above concerns,staff had recommended denial of the request. The revised plans submitted by the applicant show areduction in the height of the pole to75fee^also showing removal of the barbed wire from the screen fencing around theIleSal.quipment building.In addition,the applicant has earned out ahne-o -sigh contribute to significantly screen the tower. Representatives:Aldo Bustamante,Charlie Adams and Larry Lotterman (Lotterman Development Corporation) Felix Bravo,(AT&T Wireless) The Board staff and representatives discussed the proposal.The particular design of the i^stti-&-sskkwasstasr assotherlocationspriortoselectingtheYMtasite,ine duoiu aThTCitvAttorneyinformedtheBoardthattheTelecommunications Act of 1996^^y^^mmMpB^and local governments ^m considering anyS2lhealthissues,therefore,that could not be considered evidence that can be weighed in the determination of granting or denying the application. At 8-30 PM Mr Morton called for afive-minute recess to allow those present to examinefhe^^d photographs brought by the applicant with respect to the proposed telecommunication tower.The meeting was reconvened at 8:35 PM. Speakers:(residents against proposal): Ana M.Rabel,5876 SW 42nd Terrace Martha Cruz,5801 SW 42nd Terrace Manuel Lopez,5990 SW 44th Terrace Speaker:(for YMCA) Mark Thompson 2 (Revised) NOTE:New wording underlined Planning Board Meeting May 29,2001 conceal the tower;health threat on the long run;electrical facility installed too close to YMCAchildren's playground. The Board requested from the staff that for future applications of this nature,a site plan of the general area showing existing tower locations be included in the package,together with any possible sites where these telecommunication towers may be installed andthe reasonswhythe requests wererejected. First Motion:Mr.Comendeiro moved approval ofthe request,Ms.Gibson secondedthe motion.Mr.Mann wanted toaddto the motion the clarification that although the residents intheareaare opposed tothe proposed project,itis important to indicate that AT&T, withintheframework of the regulations,hasapparentlymadeeffortstoworkwiththe community. Action:Mr.Comendeiromovedtowithdrawhismotiontoapprove. Second Motion:Mr.Mortonmovedapproval of therequestaspresented,andshownon therevisedplans dated 5-22-01.Mr.Illas secondedthemotion. Vote:Approved 4 (Mann,Illas,Morton,Gibson) Opposed 3 (Liddy,Chimelis.Comendeiro) TheBoardwasinformedthattheCityCommission will considerthisrequestatitsnext meeting,June 12,2001 Ms.Chimelis requested thatamember of theBoardattendtheCityCommission meeting ofJunel2,2001. (B)PB-01-009 Applicant:Michael Lopez Request:AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,FLORIDA RELATING TO A REQUEST TO AMEND THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE,BY REVISING SECTION 20-3.3(D)ENTITLED "PERMITTED USE SCHEDULE"AND SECTION 20-7.12 ENTITLED "HOMETOWN DISTRICT OVERLAY ZONE- PERMITTED USES"IN ORDER TO ALLOW A TANNING STUDIO AS A PERMITTED USEIN THE "SR(HD-OV)",SPECIALTY RETAIL (HOMETOWN DISTRICT-OVERLAYZONE)USEDISTRICTS;PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Action:Mr.Morton readtherequestintotherecord.Staff recommended approval of therequestto amend theLandDevelopmentCode'sPermittedUseScheduleandthe Hometown District toallowtanningstudiosasapermitteduseintheSRand Hometown zoning districts. Applicant:MichaelLopez PlanningBoard Meeting '\. May 29,2001 TheBoard,staffand representative briefly discussedtherequest.Therewerenospeakers atthepublichearing. Motion:Mr.IllasmovedforapprovalandMr.Mannsecondedthemotion. Vote:Approved 7Opposed0 (O PB-01-007 Applicant:Mayor and Citv-Commission Request:AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,FLORIDA,RELATING TOA REQUEST TO AMEND LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 20-3.3(E)ENTITLED "OUTDOOR SEATING/DINING FOR ALL COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES,EXCEPTFORPROPERTIESINTHERORESIDENTIAL OFFICE ZONING DISTRICT."IN ORDER TO AMEND THE STANDARDS THEREIN TO INCLUDE A SPECIFIC WIDTH OF UNOBSTRUCTED PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALK PASSAGE WHICH MUST BE MAINTAINED;PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT;AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Action:Mr.Mann read the request into the record andstaff presented the proposed amendments. Speaker:MauricioFarinelli,restaurantowner. TheBoardand staff discussed therequestwhichcenteredonprovidingadditional requirements toLDC regulations governing OutdoorSeating. The staff report contained two alternative ordinances which provided for unobstructed sidewalk passage area.The Planning Board alternative (B)the five (5)feet unobstructed passage allowing onlyonerowof seating against the building.The Planning Department was recommending alternative (A)amending the current regulations to require five (5)feet of unobstructed passage for a single row of seating and six(6)feet of sidewalk between two (2)rows of seating.During discussion,Board members expressed concern that other regulations governing outdoor seating needed to be more specific,and several amendments wereproposed. Staff pointed outthatallof the amendments will be made to both sections of LDC which contained regulations on outdoor seating /dinning,those being Section 20-3.3(E)and Section 20-7.29. Motion:Mr.Comendeiro moved to approve the following amendments toSection20- 3.3(E)and Section 20-7.29,pertaining to outdoor seating /dinning:(1)that seating beon onesideofthesidewalk abutting the building,witha minimum of five (5)feetof sidewalk unobstructed for pedestrian passage;(2)maximum number of outdoor seatsshallnot 4 Planning Board Meeting •v . May 29,2001 exceed 80%ofindoor seating;(3)table umbrellas should havea minimum clearance height of seven (7)feet above the sidewalk;(4)the extension of outdoor seating shallbe limited tothe frontage of onlyone adjacent storefront;(5)the written consent provided by property owners in front of whose properties outdoor seating /dining service occurs shall includeaninsurancepolicynamingtheCityasco-insuredandaholdharmlessclausein favor of theCity.Mr.Mortonsecondedthemotion. Vote:Approved5 (Liddy),Illas,Chimelis,Gibson,Comendeiro) Opposed 2(Mann,Morton) V.Approval of Minutes Action: A.TheBoarddulyvotedonandapprovedthe minutes ofApril 24,2001. Vote:Approved7 Opposed0 VI.Discussion Items The Board and staff discussed the following butwasnot limited to:(1)the importance ofa member attending the next City Commission meeting in order to convey the views ofthe Board tothe Commission onthe requests presented at this meeting.(2)staff also stressed the importance of having quorum for the next Planning Board meeting scheduled for July 10,2001 whichistheonly meeting taking place in July.Ms.Chimelis and Mr.Mann informed thatthey will not be able to attend.Mr.Illas was uncertain whether he could attend.(3)they discussed the possibility of amending the code inthe future in order to change the number of members from five to four to constitute a quorum.Also,they discussed the possibility of providing for a special meeting.(4)Mr.Mann made reference to some neighbors who have approached him with the complaint that they are being cited for garbage protruding into the street;they claim the garbage is not theirs and itisjust being dumped in front of their property.Also,Mr.Mann referred toa new residence which it has recently been finished and which resembles a "football stadium"when islitup at night and wanted to know of any code restrictions on external lighting.Staff clarified that the above complaints should be directed to the Public Works and/or the Code Enforcement Departmentsforproper handling. VII.Adjournment Action:There being no further business before the Board,Mr.Morton adjourned the meetingat approximately 10:37 PM. K:\PB\PB Minutes\2001 Minutes\MINS 05-29-01.doc To subscribe to The Herald call: 1-800-441-0444 '*->k CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS NOTICE IS HEREBY given thatthe City Commission ofthe City of South Miami,Florida will conduct Public Hearings during its regular City Commission meeting Tuesday,July24,2001 beginningat7:30p.m.,inthe City Commission Chambers,6130 Sunset Drive.,to consider 1st Reading ofthe following described ordinance(s): AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,FLORIDA RELATING TOA REQUEST TO AMEND THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE,BY REVISING SECTION 20-3.3(D) ENTITLED "PERMITTED USE SCHEDULE"AND SECTION 20-7.12 ENTITLED "HOMETOWN DISTRICT OVERLAY ZONE- PERMITTED USES"IN ORDER TO ALLOW A TANNING STUDIO AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE "SR(HD-OV)",SPECIALTY RETAIL (HOMETOWN DISTRICT-OVERLAY ZONE)USE DISTRICTS;PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT;AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.(1st Reading -June 12,2001) AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,FLORIDA,RELATING TOA REQUEST TO AMEND LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION + 20-3.3(E)ENTITLED "OUTDOOR SEATING/DINING FOR ALL COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES,EXCEPT FOR PROPERTIES IN THERO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE ZONING DISTRICT" ANDSECTION 20-7.29 ENTITLED "OUTDOOR SEATING/DINING USES AND AREAS"INORDERTO AMEND THE REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO OUTDOOR SEATING FOR RESTAURANTS;PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT;AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (1st Reading-June 12,2001) Said ordinance canbe inspected inthe City Clerk's Office., Monday -Friday during regular office hours. Inquiriesconcerningthisitemshouldbedirectedtothe PlanningDepartmentat:663-6326. ALL interested partiesare invited toattendandwillbeheard. Ronetta Taylor,CMC CityClerk CityofSouthMiami Pursuant to Florida Statutes 286 0105.the City hereby advises the public thatifa person decides to appeal anydecision made bythisBoard,Agency or Commission wlff.a respecttoanymatter considered at its meeting orhearing,heorshewillneedarecord of the proceedings,and that for such purpose,affected person may need toensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings ismade which record includes the testimony and-' evidence upon wnfentne appeal is*to'b'e Based "•'-'"-'•''•"•'-'A'-''**.'.--"*'